Scared Monkeys Discussion Forum

Natalee Discussions (2005 ARCHIVE) => Natalee Breaking News Archive => Topic started by: RB on June 25, 2005, 10:43:05 PM



Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: RB on June 25, 2005, 10:43:05 PM
While we're a reasonable bunch, we do have some expectations for the etiquette of our posters and want you to know what will keep you in the Monkey cage, or excommunicate you to the wild jungles of the Internet to swing on a few vines to relax yourself. Needless to say, we'd like to cage you here rather than set you "free." Follow the guidelines below (there's only 3 - humor us) and you'll spend many a happy day picking flies off each other, chattering, and bouncing off the walls.

Monkeys will avoid feeding the trolls. True trolls are a rare breed; and the owners, admins and moderators know what and who they are and we have super-dooper bug spray to get rid of them. 'Nuff said.

Monkeys will use proper social etiquette in expressing their opinions. There are always more than 1 side and opinion to every story; some posts you will like and agree with, and others you won't. While lively debate is appreciated, moderators and forum admins reserve the right to admonish and/or eject, without notice, those parties who debate using insults, engage in name-calling, or otherwise imflammatory posts. Act like you're at a public place using the manners your mother taught you and you'll be just fine. If you don't have manners, don't bother posting as it just wastes our time mashing the "banned" button. We've got other things to do.

Monkeys recognize that the forum threads and some functionality may be temporarily unavailable at times. During high peak periods, forum operators may disable some features such as avatars, sig lines and the like. We'll restore it when the hooplah dies down. Likewise, we reserve the right to edit, delete or move posts or threads in any manner that we choose. Hey, when it's your house, you can move the furniture.....


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Gitarzan on June 25, 2005, 10:50:39 PM
Post has been moved - you can view it here:

http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/Discussion/viewtopic.php?t=356


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: nancy_drew on June 25, 2005, 10:53:23 PM
I'm sure this will be censored too.

It's sad this has happened. Razzy is a good addition to the forum.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: pinemeadows on June 25, 2005, 11:03:04 PM
Quote from: "iquitos"
These people are trying to use the media to direct the investigation  They better be careful.


Yes, I totally agree.  Heard tonight from Mr. Croes (the official) that there may well be a change of venue for this case, which could mean that it will definitely be scrutinized for the slightest infringement of their laws.

And if something is leaked, and discussed, it will be thrown out.  Our media is doing a great job, but we're beginning to hear what many consider "inside information."  They need to back off.  just my NSHO.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: lilizzyboo on June 25, 2005, 11:04:57 PM
ok, so i saw the theory about the phone calls placed to the brothers about a ride home and then cancellation of this...if this is true, then who picked him up? and how "premeditated" could this all be?

k


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: heartache on June 25, 2005, 11:04:58 PM
nikki... it was a question. And one I think I can answer. No, the damn beach has not been dug up and if there were cadaver dogs in Aruba then the Texans would not be bringing them.


Title: Just off Geraldo at Large
Post by: Compananzi on June 25, 2005, 11:05:17 PM
Geraldo: What question have I not ask that you might want to see or happen?
Jug Twitty: I like to see Mrs Anita van der sloot questioned as well eventho she was not in Aruba..

Hmm..Id summon the dog as well.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: friend of monkeys on June 25, 2005, 11:05:56 PM
Quote from: "pinemeadows"
Quote from: "iquitos"
These people are trying to use the media to direct the investigation  They better be careful.


Yes, I totally agree.  Heard tonight from Mr. Croes (the official) that there may well be a change of venue for this case, which could mean that it will definitely be scrutinized for the slightest infringement of their laws.

And if something is leaked, and discussed, it will be thrown out.  Our media is doing a great job, but we're beginning to hear what many consider "inside information."  They need to back off.  just my NSHO.


oh please...the truth is the truth...
maybe this forum is just a faster medium.
IMHFO
 :?:


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: coco on June 25, 2005, 11:06:50 PM
I think Jug just looks awful when he asks that Anita be brought in  - he looks cruel and that does not help keep support amongst Arubans or Dutch for the prosecution. It looks like he is pushing the investigation and that's already a fear so he would be very smart to stop those kinds of statements.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: absolut on June 25, 2005, 11:06:56 PM
(writenow) Very Concise and detailed Timeline can be found here. Great Job on it by the way. It is sticky'd and can be posted to as well.

http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/Discussion/viewtopic.php?p=35052#35052


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Red on June 25, 2005, 11:07:39 PM
Nancy Drew
Quote
Yes, he is protected from revealing info his son has told him
HOWEVER, He is not protected from things he saw with his own eyes. It's a narrow law.


Really? I could have sworn I heard on Fox today an Int'l atty say there was no protection of parent-child relationship info.

Do you know this as absolute fact?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Kshe78 on June 25, 2005, 11:08:11 PM
kshe78 wrote:
From Jossy Mansur:

Apparently Joran is not cooperating very well with the investigation.

GR: In what way is he not cooperating? Is he being arrogant, claiming ignorance, defiant, etc.?

JM: No, he's not defiant or ignorant or anything. He's just sticking to the rules of the investigation. If this is the hour when you have to stop the interrogation, stop. I'm not answering anything.


Is she saying he's refusing to answer anything? Or he watches the clock and stops talking when he knows the hours are up? I'm confused.

Writenow
First - I made a mistake - they were speaking of Paulus VDS, not Joran, sorry!

All that was said is what I posted above.  He did say at first, "we don't know much about what he's saying b/c they are not releasing anything.  Apparently, he's not cooperating very well with the interrogation."  

It should be noted that he's the editor of a paper, and is apparently geeting his info. from somewhere, but we cannot verify it.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Kipster on June 25, 2005, 11:08:31 PM
>>Geraldo: What question have I not ask that you might want to see or happen?
Jug Twitty: I like to see Mrs Anita van der sloot questioned as well eventho she was not in Aruba..

Good one, he pegged 'slimeball', she's next..."Kleenex Ma'am?".


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: pinemeadows on June 25, 2005, 11:08:40 PM
Quote from: "friend of monkeys"

oh please...the truth is the truth...
maybe this forum is just a faster medium.
IMHFO
 :?:


This has nothing to do with truth, but their laws.

In the US, you can discuss a case with new facts revealed every single day.  Not so over there.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: coco on June 25, 2005, 11:09:16 PM
I think the protection of parent child conversations was confirmed last night by several aruban lawyers on Greta.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: nikkibnurse on June 25, 2005, 11:09:33 PM
Quote from: "heartache"
nikki... it was a question. And one I think I can answer. No, the damn beach has not been dug up and if there were cadaver dogs in Aruba then the Texans would not be bringing them.


Oh, i thought that was what you were saying..sorry..


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: OldFart on June 25, 2005, 11:10:48 PM
Quote from: "lilizzyboo"
ok, so i saw the theory about the phone calls placed to the brothers about a ride home and then cancellation of this...if this is true, then who picked him up? and how "premeditated" could this all be?

k

lizzboo I missed most of the interview. but I thought that geraldo was talking to an official.

Was the offical stating "evidance type facts" or what the Kids have said ?

If fact could it be a "disclosure" that would invalidate the case?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Kshe78 on June 25, 2005, 11:12:05 PM
Quote from: "coco"
I think Jug just looks awful when he asks that Anita be brought in  - he looks cruel and that does not help keep support amongst Arubans or Dutch for the prosecution. It looks like he is pushing the investigation and that's already a fear so he would be very smart to stop those kinds of statements.


While I understand (and partly agree with) your point of view, I can see his point as well.  While she wasn't home when whatever happened, happened, she has been at home with her husband and son since.  I wouldn't have a problem with them questioning her, and, quite honestly, she would probably be the easiest to break and/or get her husband or son to break.  I'm not talking about taking her into custody, but just questioning her separately.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: KerinTX on June 25, 2005, 11:12:17 PM
Quote from: "Red"
Nancy Drew
Quote
Yes, he is protected from revealing info his son has told him
HOWEVER, He is not protected from things he saw with his own eyes. It's a narrow law.


Really? I could have sworn I heard on Fox today an Int'l atty say there was no protection of parent-child relationship info.

Do you know this as absolute fact?


That's my understanding too, Nancy.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: pinemeadows on June 25, 2005, 11:12:54 PM
Quote from: "Red"
Do you know this as absolute fact?


It was covered several times this evening...he will not be required to testify against Joran.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: arubagirl on June 25, 2005, 11:13:00 PM
If Jug said that, and AvdS is going to be detained, then I guess we know who's running the show.

AvdS wasn't on the island, so she couldn't see/hear anything. And anything that JvdS told her she doesn't have to reveal, so basically, there is no point.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: nancy_drew on June 25, 2005, 11:13:09 PM
Quote from: "Red"
Nancy Drew
Quote
Yes, he is protected from revealing info his son has told him
HOWEVER, He is not protected from things he saw with his own eyes. It's a narrow law.


Really? I could have sworn I heard on Fox today an Int'l atty say there was no protection of parent-child relationship info.

Do you know this as absolute fact?


I've read it and seen it described several times. We should ask for confirmation ...but, I've been fascinated with the law and the ramifications to this case. Dutch law extends the marital privilege (husband/wife)  we have here to parent/child. Paulas is protected from what he heard, but NOT what he may have seen.

This is an important deal....because when LE brought him in they knew this...so some people feel his involvement may well be greater than a normal suspect as he's already protected.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: friend of monkeys on June 25, 2005, 11:13:43 PM
Quote from: "pinemeadows"
Quote from: "friend of monkeys"

oh please...the truth is the truth...
maybe this forum is just a faster medium.
IMHFO
 :?:


This has nothing to do with truth, but their laws.

In the US, you can discuss a case with new facts revealed every single day.  Not so over there.



well then "this" is somewhere inbetween ...
unchartered waters so to speak?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: coco on June 25, 2005, 11:14:24 PM
I think the polis should question her - and I suspect they have since I don't think (anyone know this?) that they can only question someone if they bring them in - but to have Jug calling for her interrogation after he was pushing for PVDS' arrest is just bad strategy - imho.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: arrabba on June 25, 2005, 11:14:36 PM
Nice Timeline WriteNow - Thanks for posting it!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Kshe78 on June 25, 2005, 11:14:38 PM
G'night monkeys.  Have to get this place packed before Tuesday.

:::looking around::::  Could be a problem.   :?

Will be back tomorrow, hopefully hearing that Natalee has been found and I can get some order back in my life!   :)


Title: Re: Just off Geraldo at Large
Post by: CaliGirl on June 25, 2005, 11:14:38 PM
Quote from: "Compananzi"
Geraldo: What question have I not ask that you might want to see or happen?
Jug Twitty: I like to see Mrs Anita van der sloot questioned as well eventho she was not in Aruba..

Hmm..Id summon the dog as well.


Next on Geraldo..So fido van der sloot.. we know you have involvement and knowledge in the disapearance of Natalee, we can do this the easy way or the hard way...the animal control is one phone call away and I can have you put in the slammer...

Fido : woof woof woof ::whine::

Geraldo: This confirms it, I am going on the record that from this reliable source the van der sloot's are 100% responsible for this disapearance..he's going to lead me to the body in an exclusive not seen anywhere else..

:::fido sniffs for 5 minutes and relieves himself on a tree:::

Geraldo annoucing he has solved the case, cracked a suspect and found Natalee...she's under s tree because Fido said so...

Sorry I had to include a funny Geraldo moment! lmao


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Selena on June 25, 2005, 11:14:41 PM
I don't suppose the name of PVDS 's attorney has been disclosed, has it? Is Antonio Carlos still representing Joran. Antonio was a student of Pauls' from what I read. Just curious.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: arubagirl on June 25, 2005, 11:14:46 PM
if Paul van der Sloot heard something (i.e. NH talking) or saw something, he has to tell.

If Joran told him something (dad, this is what happened to her), then he doesn't have to tell.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: arubagirl on June 25, 2005, 11:15:36 PM
I've heard Ariaen de Bie and Arie Swaen.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: writenow on June 25, 2005, 11:16:14 PM
Quote from: "absolut"
(writenow) Very Concise and detailed Timeline can be found here. Great Job on it by the way. It is sticky'd and can be posted to as well.

http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/Discussion/viewtopic.php?p=35052#35052


If anyone has better times/facts, please PM me. It's still a work in progress...


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: pinemeadows on June 25, 2005, 11:16:57 PM
Have heard a couple of times that the VDS house is boarded up.  Where did AVDS go with the kids - back to Holland?  Anyone know?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: arubagirl on June 25, 2005, 11:16:59 PM
coco, according to Canal 90 they have interrogated AvdS


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Another K in Texas on June 25, 2005, 11:17:08 PM
Every Aruban attorney asked yesterday gave pretty much the same answer.  Parent child protection for anything you are told but not for any thing you see--and not for anything you do as a result of what you may have been told.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: absolut on June 25, 2005, 11:17:53 PM
Quote from: "writenow"
Quote from: "absolut"
(writenow) Very Concise and detailed Timeline can be found here. Great Job on it by the way. It is sticky'd and can be posted to as well.

http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/Discussion/viewtopic.php?p=35052#35052


If anyone has better times/facts, please PM me. It's still a work in progress...


It will be posted on the rss page and other places starting in the AM and updated. (writenow) is now my source :)


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: arubagirl on June 25, 2005, 11:18:22 PM
I don't think AvdS went to Holland when her son and husband are in jail. I'm guessing that a) she boarded it up for privacy b) They just went somehwere else on the island, stay with friends or something.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Dallas Also on June 25, 2005, 11:18:29 PM
Quote from: "heartache"
nikki... it was a question. And one I think I can answer. No, the damn beach has not been dug up and if there were cadaver dogs in Aruba then the Texans would not be bringing them.


When the threesome changed their story, and the Marriott was mentioned for the first time, authorities drained a pond and did some digging around the Marriott, if I remember correctly.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: bobntexas on June 25, 2005, 11:18:29 PM
Quote from: "arubagirl"
If Jug said that, and AvdS is going to be detained, then I guess we know who's running the show.

AvdS wasn't on the island, so she couldn't see/hear anything. And anything that JvdS told her she doesn't have to reveal, so basically, there is no point.


Would she be forced to reveal what her husband told her or does the Dutch law have the same provision as the US law regarding spousal privilege?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: nancy_drew on June 25, 2005, 11:18:44 PM
Quote from: "arubagirl"
if Paul van der Sloot heard something (i.e. NH talking) or saw something, he has to tell.

If Joran told him something (dad, this is what happened to her), then he doesn't have to tell.


No, that's not how I read it's described.  The law goes both ways...parent and child.

For instance if Joran confessed to his dad that he killed Natalee, that's protected.  Or vise versa.

HOWEVER, if either of them saw something they are not protected.

In our country the privilege is only for husband/wife.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: friend of monkeys on June 25, 2005, 11:18:55 PM
Quote from: "arubagirl"
if Paul van der Sloot heard something (i.e. NH talking) or saw something, he has to tell.

If Joran told him something (dad, this is what happened to her), then he doesn't have to tell.


maybe that is why in interview Paulus said he still beleieved in his son.
as if he believed joran could maintain the wall???
then papito goes in (pvds)
he knew that joran was in jail for not pointing
finger at dadda
IMHOA :roll:


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Compananzi on June 25, 2005, 11:20:03 PM
Quote from: "coco"
I think Jug just looks awful when he asks that Anita be brought in  - he looks cruel and that does not help keep support amongst Arubans or Dutch for the prosecution. It looks like he is pushing the investigation and that's already a fear so he would be very smart to stop those kinds of statements.


Frankly I really dont care at this moment for them either..Yes blah blah Natalee is the victim but there crucial events that we do not know and they hold the key as well in order to solve this problem...One could say with suspicion..the following..

1. Almost and organized response with in 12 hours to 18 hours that they were here in Aruba.
2. Total black out of the views and information of all the MB students.  The immediate reproach of anything that is not in a favorable light of Nat.
3. The weird 1st poster of the search of Nat...and the first weird local Aruba TV suplication by Big Hootie for her daughter..Remember the first 2 hours they knew where to go and who to accuse...this small but crucial fact does not fit the response of the poster nor TV appearance.
4. The uncomfortable insuation that the suspect need to be added more pressure to confess.  Is torture in mind? Gitmo perhaps?
5. The dangling of a carot on MSM that more arrest are on the way, well if the police is stonewalling how the heck you pull that wabbit?
6. The tie in with ..tourism..If I don;t get my way this will hurt Aruba's Tourism. Frankly of all the island in the carribean, especially in reference to American Tourism, the cooperation has been unquestionable.
7. I think there is a real danger that if this continues we may not be for sure what really happens....all Joran has to do is say ok I did it she out in the sea and everyone is off the hook.  Case closed, no body, perhaps 20 year with early parole.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: friend of monkeys on June 25, 2005, 11:20:24 PM
Quote from: "arubagirl"
coco, according to Canal 90 they have interrogated AvdS


NICE...next???


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: nancy_drew on June 25, 2005, 11:20:27 PM
Quote from: "bobntexas"
Quote from: "arubagirl"
If Jug said that, and AvdS is going to be detained, then I guess we know who's running the show.

AvdS wasn't on the island, so she couldn't see/hear anything. And anything that JvdS told her she doesn't have to reveal, so basically, there is no point.


Would she be forced to reveal what her husband told her or does the Dutch law have the same provision as the US law regarding spousal privilege?


From the way I understand it, husband wife is protected...as well as parent child.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Kipster on June 25, 2005, 11:21:05 PM
>>I think Jug just looks awful when he asks that Anita be brought in - he looks cruel and that does not help keep support amongst Arubans or Dutch for the prosecution. It looks like he is pushing the investigation and that's already a fear so he would be very smart to stop those kinds of statements.

He might be a monkey (http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/Discussion/viewtopic.php?p=30826&highlight=#30826) DutchLady:
Quote
Unless Anita Van Der Sloot comes clean of her own domestic abuse, which is in her eyes, and tissues I shall be forced to do this, as ethical. I do not like the words or that shown me. For I love her and her and feel for her suffering.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: friend of monkeys on June 25, 2005, 11:22:22 PM
Quote from: "arubagirl"
coco, according to Canal 90 they have interrogated AvdS



according to dag...song just played with "molenita"
Do aloy of people there have monkees too?//??
I do love 'em....but   WTF!!!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: sb on June 25, 2005, 11:22:27 PM
Anyone else getting the idea that the ATTORNEYS are trying to spread disinformation and confusion? I am very skeptical of anything they say. It's like "controlled leaking" of what they want out there and it IS confusing.

Would the attorneys be trying to get the case thrown out in a pro-active way? Can they do that? Or will the judge kick them off like he did with joran's initial lawyer.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: boxopen on June 25, 2005, 11:22:43 PM
Quote from: "arubagirl"
If Jug said that, and AvdS is going to be detained, then I guess we know who's running the show.
AvdS wasn't on the island, so she couldn't see/hear anything. And anything that JvdS told her she doesn't have to reveal, so basically, there is no point.
Or, in other words... who MISLEAD the investigation since the beginning. :?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Ladyhawke112 on June 25, 2005, 11:23:19 PM
I'm warp-speed-reading trying to catch up. Regading an exchange between Iquitos and ExTexinAz near the end of the last thread - Is the new judge in Curacao?  If so, isn't fast and easy to take a boat to Aruba?

Also, whan I stopped reading this morning, you all were discussing the effects of date rape drugs. If you need any more first hand info, I have an unusual experience with that and would be happy to share.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: arubagirl on June 25, 2005, 11:24:27 PM
Nancy_Drew, I don't see where we differ. If Paul van der Sloot heard something suspicious, but information that he didn't get from Joran, he's supposed to tell. Natalee screaming, door slamming at odd hours, etc. If he saw Natalee in his house he's also supposed to tell
If Joran came to him and said: Dad, I left NH alone on the beach and she was abducted by aliens, Paul van der Sloot is not obligated from saying that to the cops.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: absolut on June 25, 2005, 11:24:37 PM
Ok here is what I had earlier that never panned out, source or confirmation.

The Texas group can't believe the amount of (stuff, crap, objects, areas) that there are on the island. I don't think this means trash or that the place is unclean just they move for minutes of search and they find "something" and either have to catalog or discount and move on. As of tonight there was no word of having turned over anything or them having anything of interest. Again never got reported therefore we have no facts.

There were rumblings of more arrest, rumblings of releases and final rumblings of a trip back to the PD for JVDS and PVDS. None of which happened.

So here is what I am looking for between now and 6am either releases in the middle of the night or nothing. Then 8:30am hearing for who is left.

So don't put it in a timeline, don't quote it really isn't that important since it didn't happen.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: writenow on June 25, 2005, 11:24:40 PM
Quote from: "heartache"
nikki... it was a question. And one I think I can answer. No, the damn beach has not been dug up and if there were cadaver dogs in Aruba then the Texans would not be bringing them.


OK. Didn't the LE dig up the beach at the Marriott (forgot to add that to timeline)? With the too-happy panty guy and the radio station calling for diggers in the morning before the LE got there in the afternoon? Hasn't this area been thoroughly searched? Tuesday June 14.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: KerinTX on June 25, 2005, 11:25:35 PM
Quote from: "writenow"
Quote from: "absolut"
(writenow) Very Concise and detailed Timeline can be found here. Great Job on it by the way. It is sticky'd and can be posted to as well.

http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/Discussion/viewtopic.php?p=35052#35052


If anyone has better times/facts, please PM me. It's still a work in progress...


GREAT job, Write!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: SunnyinTX on June 25, 2005, 11:25:41 PM
Quote from: "coco"
I think the protection of parent child conversations was confirmed last night by several aruban lawyers on Greta.


You are correct...it was confirmed several times....


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: iquitos on June 25, 2005, 11:26:11 PM
Quote from: "friend of monkeys"
Quote from: "pinemeadows"
Quote from: "iquitos"
These people are trying to use the media to direct the investigation  They better be careful.


Yes, I totally agree.  Heard tonight from Mr. Croes (the official) that there may well be a change of venue for this case, which could mean that it will definitely be scrutinized for the slightest infringement of their laws.

And if something is leaked, and discussed, it will be thrown out.  Our media is doing a great job, but we're beginning to hear what many consider "inside information."  They need to back off.  just my NSHO.


oh please...the truth is the truth...
maybe this forum is just a faster medium.
IMHFO
 :?:
 

The other legal question here that might influence the venue, even back to Holland, is the proper treatment of juvenile detainees.  Can you use the same methods under dutch law to "break" a kid?  I suspect that the prosecutorial crew in Aruba are inexperienced second stringers (as Poor Paulus may have been).  They are also his former colleagues.  They may be over compensating for their initial disbelief that Joran could be involved and reacting to external pressure the likes of which they surely have never seen in their lives by putting their toughest face forward.  It appears to me that unless they get a break, this one will be in the courts for a long time.  if these guys don't talk, as they apparently are not in any productive way, they can't hold them for the legally allowed time without wearing everybody down and destroying their tourism based economy in the process.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: arubagirl on June 25, 2005, 11:26:15 PM
Ladyhawk, yes the judges are coming from Curacao, and it would be a miserable 3 hours on the boat. The waters are very choppy in between Cur. and Aua.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: friend of monkeys on June 25, 2005, 11:26:27 PM
Quote from: "Compananzi"
Quote from: "coco"
I think Jug just looks awful when he asks that Anita be brought in  - he looks cruel and that does not help keep support amongst Arubans or Dutch for the prosecution. It looks like he is pushing the investigation and that's already a fear so he would be very smart to stop those kinds of statements.


Frankly I really dont care at this moment for them either..Yes blah blah Natalee is the victim but there crucial events that we do not know and they hold the key as well in order to solve this problem...One could say with suspicion..the following..

1. Almost and organized response with in 12 hours to 18 hours that they were here in Aruba.
2. Total black out of the views and information of all the MB students.  The immediate reproach of anything that is not in a favorable light of Nat.
3. The weird 1st poster of the search of Nat...and the first weird local Aruba TV suplication by Big Hootie for her daughter..Remember the first 2 hours they knew where to go and who to accuse...this small but crucial fact does not fit the response of the poster nor TV appearance.
4. The uncomfortable insuation that the suspect need to be added more pressure to confess.  Is torture in mind? Gitmo perhaps?
5. The dangling of a carot on MSM that more arrest are on the way, well if the police is stonewalling how the heck you pull that wabbit?
6. The tie in with ..tourism..If I don;t get my way this will hurt Aruba's Tourism. Frankly of all the island in the carribean, especially in reference to American Tourism, the cooperation has been unquestionable.
7. I think there is a real danger that if this continues we may not be for sure what really happens....all Joran has to do is say ok I did it she out in the sea and everyone is off the hook.  Case closed, no body, perhaps 20 year with early parole.


 :arrow: Then lets add/ just for shits and giggles/
the news on fox today re oil prices and need for refinreies....
close now to $60 barrel??
maybe it is bigger than state of texas!!!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Florida_mom on June 25, 2005, 11:26:56 PM
Quote from: "arrabba"
Nice Timeline WriteNow - Thanks for posting it!


Yes, great timeline!  One interesting thing Greta said this evening is that PVDS told her in the interview that he was gambling with his son the evening of May 29th at the HI, then left his son there, and then JVDS called his Dad at 11PM from Mcdonalds to get a ride home.  It suprises me that ,being a Judicial offical, he would admit to that.  Isn't it illegal yo gamble at 17 in Aruba?  Although he wasn't charged with contributing to the delinquincy of a minor.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Compananzi on June 25, 2005, 11:27:07 PM
Quote from: "arubagirl"
coco, according to Canal 90 they have interrogated AvdS


I think its a bit disgusting to see Jug smile with glee at Paul's arrest.  He'll probably be so happy if they charge AVDS as well.

You know when people get killed or murdered you always see the family crying and sobbing...I have not seen it in MSM. Maybe they cry off camera, but it sure looks cold to me...it raises no sympathy...so I hope hope the spin doc relay this to the them.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: arubagirl on June 25, 2005, 11:27:20 PM
iquietos, as I understand, they brought in Dutch experts in interrogating. I don't think these people would have any loyalty to PvdS


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: writenow on June 25, 2005, 11:28:19 PM
Quote from: "Ladyhawke112"
I'm warp-speed-reading trying to catch up. Regading an exchange between Iquitos and ExTexinAz near the end of the last thread - Is the new judge in Curacao?  If so, isn't fast and easy to take a boat to Aruba?

Also, whan I stopped reading this morning, you all were discussing the effects of date rape drugs. If you need any more first hand info, I have an unusual experience with that and would be happy to share.


Please share.

I did meet a girl (one of the first to file a lawsuit about it) who was given a roofie. She said she couldn't move.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: CancunMole on June 25, 2005, 11:28:47 PM
Quote from: "arubagirl"
If Jug said that, and AvdS is going to be detained, then I guess we know who's running the show.

AvdS wasn't on the island, so she couldn't see/hear anything. And anything that JvdS told her she doesn't have to reveal, so basically, there is no point.


This, I'm sure will not be popular but, my dog wouldn't let Jug in my house with all his vinegar. To me, the way the vdSs' dogs reacted to strangers, told me volumes about them as people who live/brought the dogs up. Barking but tails awagin'.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: friend of monkeys on June 25, 2005, 11:28:54 PM
Quote from: "boxopen"
Quote from: "arubagirl"
If Jug said that, and AvdS is going to be detained, then I guess we know who's running the show.
AvdS wasn't on the island, so she couldn't see/hear anything. And anything that JvdS told her she doesn't have to reveal, so basically, there is no point.
Or, in other words... who MISLEAD the investigation since the beginning. :?


WTF have u been???
I'm almost at 1,000....


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Ladyhawke112 on June 25, 2005, 11:29:06 PM
Quote from: "arubagirl"
Ladyhawk, yes the judges are coming from Curacao, and it would be a miserable 3 hours on the boat. The waters are very choppy in between Cur. and Aua.


Thank you for clarifying - now it makes sense to me that they should wait for a flight.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Selena on June 25, 2005, 11:30:09 PM
This mat be moot,but PVDS was not working prior to NH's appearence on the island. He was trying to get some type of position in the justice dept, clerical or something to that nature. People have posted that a part time judge doesn't make a very hefty salary anyway, but he was out of work. His wife is a teacher. Who was paying for nights out on the town and gambling? And was Mrs in Holland for a week? that would have menat the other two children were home, at school all week? Does anyone know?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: absolut on June 25, 2005, 11:30:54 PM
Quote from: "Florida_mom"
Quote from: "arrabba"
Nice Timeline WriteNow - Thanks for posting it!


Yes, great timeline!  One interesting thing Greta said this evening is that PVDS told her in the interview that he was gambling with his son the evening of May 29th at the HI, then left his son there, and then JVDS called his Dad at 11PM from Mcdonalds to get a ride home.  It suprises me that ,being a Judicial offical, he would admit to that.  Isn't it illegal yo gamble at 17 in Aruba?  Although he wasn't charged with contributing to the delinquincy of a minor.


Even funnier is if Joran did finish 4th in the hold em tournament, he beat daddy and took his money unless Papa was in the top 3.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: nancy_drew on June 25, 2005, 11:31:10 PM
Quote from: "arubagirl"
Nancy_Drew, I don't see where we differ. If Paul van der Sloot heard something suspicious, but information that he didn't get from Joran, he's supposed to tell. Natalee screaming, door slamming at odd hours, etc. If he saw Natalee in his house he's also supposed to tell
If Joran came to him and said: Dad, I left NH alone on the beach and she was abducted by aliens, Paul van der Sloot is not obligated from saying that to the cops.


Exacty.  Sorry, I must have read your post wrong.

Anything Paulas has heard from his son...even a phone call, confession,etc. it's protected. If he saw anything...a body, etc. he must tell.

I just thought of something.  What if they have a phone record of a call from Joran to his dad. The discussion in that call is protected.  Hmmmmm.  Weird.

Edited to add: I meant to say the fact the call was made is not protected, but what was said is.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: bobntexas on June 25, 2005, 11:32:03 PM
Companzi stated:"I think its a bit disgusting to see Jug smile with glee at Paul's arrest. He'll probably be so happy if they charge AVDS as well. "

I suspect Jug was reacting with the manner PVDS obstructed the investigation the first night.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: SunnyinTX on June 25, 2005, 11:32:55 PM
Quote from: "arubagirl"
If Jug said that, and AvdS is going to be detained, then I guess we know who's running the show.

AvdS wasn't on the island, so she couldn't see/hear anything. And anything that JvdS told her she doesn't have to reveal, so basically, there is no point.


I ws shocked when he said that....that poor woman has been through enough.....I know many will not agree with me....but it's my opinion.  Certainly it doesn't compare to what Beth and family have been and are still going through....but as Arubagirl says...anything she might know (and I doubt she knows a thing) would be protected. As far as her being the easiest to break...I think not....remember she would be the lioness is protecting her cub...

JM thoughts


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Kkial on June 25, 2005, 11:33:09 PM
Quote from: "friend of monkeys"
Quote from: "arubagirl"
coco, according to Canal 90 they have interrogated AvdS



I think that is what he said,,not detain,,obviously he did not know...But, I would want to ask her a few questions if I was the LE


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: goon squad on June 25, 2005, 11:33:39 PM
<<Or, in other words... who MISLEAD the investigation since the beginning.>>


Yeah, like no searches tied to JVDS and the Kalpoes for a week and a half... totally Jug's call!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: OldFart on June 25, 2005, 11:33:39 PM
Do we know if LE ever took anyone back to the beach drop off spot(if there was one) to look for any evidance?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: coco on June 25, 2005, 11:34:03 PM
Compananzi - I'm not sure I follow your post but I do feel queazy about the speed of response from the Natalee's parents and the level of it. I could imagine Beth and Jug flying in to "wait for Natalee" and ask questions and push the police to investigate but there's something about Jug and 5 buddies (I think that's what he said the other night) and the FBI and the DEA all descending that fast - coupled with the complete shutdown of any negative info or even informational info from MB students that sits in the back of my mind nagging. Not even speculating here, just recording uneasiness on this score.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Scott on June 25, 2005, 11:34:18 PM
Does anyone know when Joran's birthday is?

My understanding is that no one has yet been formally arraigned.

If Joran were to turn 18 before he is charged with murder, could he then be tried as an adult?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: arubagirl on June 25, 2005, 11:34:34 PM
kkial, I can understand the willingness of the police to ask her, but what precisely would they ask? "So, saw anything different when you came back?"


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: nancy_drew on June 25, 2005, 11:34:35 PM
Quote from: "Selena"
This mat be moot,but PVDS was not working prior to NH's appearence on the island. He was trying to get some type of position in the justice dept, clerical or something to that nature. People have posted that a part time judge doesn't make a very hefty salary anyway, but he was out of work. His wife is a teacher. Who was paying for nights out on the town and gambling? And was Mrs in Holland for a week? that would have menat the other two children were home, at school all week? Does anyone know?


He was also a law professor.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: absolut on June 25, 2005, 11:34:50 PM
Quote from: "OldFart"
Do we know if LE ever took anyone back to the beach drop off spot(if there was one) to look for any evidance?


I would have JVDS out there every night at 3am in the dark. Then place a tape over loud speakers with Natalees voice.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Kipster on June 25, 2005, 11:34:54 PM
Soo, arubagirl, why did you allude to the issue that you would be crazy to snap a shot of the VDSs' backyard? Is it taped off? Is it a media frenzy? How close can one get? Curious...thx.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Daniel on June 25, 2005, 11:35:13 PM
In Dutch law (which again, is not 100% identical to what they have on Aruba), you do not have to say anything at all during the pre-trial investigations. During a trial, you do not have to relate any information that might  incriminate yourself, your spouse or ex spouse, your (grand)children, (grand)parents or sibblings, or even uncles, aunts, cousins and nephews in 'up to the third degree'.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Florida_mom on June 25, 2005, 11:36:18 PM
Quote from: "Scott"
Does anyone know when Joran's birthday is?

My understanding is that no one has yet been formally arraigned.

If Joran were to turn 18 before he is charged with murder, could he then be tried as an adult?


I remember reading on one of Jorans boards that his birthday is in August.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: friend of monkeys on June 25, 2005, 11:36:24 PM
Quote from: "bobntexas"
Companzi stated:"I think its a bit disgusting to see Jug smile with glee at Paul's arrest. He'll probably be so happy if they charge AVDS as well. "

I suspect Jug was reacting with the manner PVDS obstructed the investigation the first night.


sounds reasonable!
they say ignorance is bliss but
maybe its just plain stupid ignarance.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: klaasend on June 25, 2005, 11:36:42 PM
Quote from: "arubagirl"
kkial, I can understand the willingness of the police to ask her, but what precisely would they ask? "So, saw anything different when you came back?"

I suspect if they do arrest her, it will be soley to put pressure on PVDS and JVDS.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: arubagirl on June 25, 2005, 11:37:23 PM
Daniel, for real? Wow, didn't know that.

Kipster, urm, it's a backyard. To take a picture I would have to go the back of the house. I'm pretty sure that the walls are high, and my camera can't take pictures through walls, so that's not going to happen.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Compananzi on June 25, 2005, 11:37:27 PM
Quote from: "writenow"
Quote from: "heartache"
nikki... it was a question. And one I think I can answer. No, the damn beach has not been dug up and if there were cadaver dogs in Aruba then the Texans would not be bringing them.


OK. Didn't the LE dig up the beach at the Marriott (forgot to add that to timeline)? With the too-happy panty guy and the radio station calling for diggers in the morning before the LE got there in the afternoon? Hasn't this area been thoroughly searched? Tuesday June 14.



Also I think Nat was on de palm tours on the 29th, from 930 - 2 pm.  I don't think all 140 MB students could jump on this boat.

Also Deepak does not end work at 10pm, according to the mom he finishes at 11pm.

Also the Soul beach Festival was from 7-11pm. starring Lauryn Hill..Nat could have been there..


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Selena on June 25, 2005, 11:37:31 PM
He was in the past or he was teaching at the time, Antonio Carlo was one of his students, was this in Aruba? I read that he was out of work and looking for a position with the justice dept, or some related position just recently.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Ladyhawke112 on June 25, 2005, 11:37:46 PM
Quote from: "bobntexas"
Companzi stated:"I think its a bit disgusting to see Jug smile with glee at Paul's arrest. He'll probably be so happy if they charge AVDS as well. "

I suspect Jug was reacting with the manner PVDS obstructed the investigation the first night.


Regarding Jug's description of PVDS' and Deepak's obstruction the first night, in how (I assume) they both were telling JVDS (who Jug says wanted to help) "not to say anything." I personally think that is really why PVDS was arrested. But more curiously to me, how does Jug's description of that night jive with  Beth's, who claimed that JVDS was rude and arrogant to her?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: absolut on June 25, 2005, 11:37:47 PM
Quote from: "coco"
Compananzi - I'm not sure I follow your post but I do feel queazy about the speed of response from the Natalee's parents and the level of it. I could imagine Beth and Jug flying in to "wait for Natalee" and ask questions and push the police to investigate but there's something about Jug and 5 buddies (I think that's what he said the other night) and the FBI and the DEA all descending that fast - coupled with the complete shutdown of any negative info or even informational info from MB students that sits in the back of my mind nagging. Not even speculating here, just recording uneasiness on this score.


Is it true on top of it that Beth was in Arkansas and had to drive home first?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: sb on June 25, 2005, 11:37:56 PM
Jug and Beth Twitty are the kind of people who're determined to find their daughter and they really don't care too much what anyone thinks of why or how they go about it! They are VICTIMS and they don't need all the finger-pointing at them right now. They are more worried about RESULTS than IMAGE.


Title: Re: Just off Geraldo at Large
Post by: puggywug on June 25, 2005, 11:38:25 PM
Quote from: "CaliGirl"
Sorry I had to include a funny Geraldo moment! lmao

LOVED it!  LOL! ROFLMAO!  :D  :D


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Selena on June 25, 2005, 11:38:56 PM
Nat was at the BOYZIIMEN concert, Soul Festival.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: mia on June 25, 2005, 11:39:30 PM
Quote from: "Selena"
This mat be moot,but PVDS was not working prior to NH's appearence on the island. He was trying to get some type of position in the justice dept, clerical or something to that nature. People have posted that a part time judge doesn't make a very hefty salary anyway, but he was out of work. His wife is a teacher. Who was paying for nights out on the town and gambling? And was Mrs in Holland for a week? that would have menat the other two children were home, at school all week? Does anyone know?


I believe I heard them say on the news that he was also a teacher and had been turned down for the position as a judge.  (On Geraldo tonight)


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: arubagirl on June 25, 2005, 11:39:37 PM
Well, Sb, I'm curious why she went to JvdS house, and not for example the Kalpoe's house.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Kkial on June 25, 2005, 11:40:33 PM
Quote from: "arubagirl"
kkial, I can understand the willingness of the police to ask her, but what precisely would they ask? "So, saw anything different when you came back?"


I am not so sure that they did not talk to her last weekend..remember she was there at the same time as PVDS..I would ask a lot of the same questions that Greta asked....She certainly is not responsible for anything that her son "might" had done...that is all..I feel sorry for her


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: iquitos on June 25, 2005, 11:40:35 PM
Quote from: "arubagirl"
iquietos, as I understand, they brought in Dutch experts in interrogating. I don't think these people would have any loyalty to PvdS


The interrogators wouldn't but what about the prosecutors who are his colleagues?  the appearance is that they first cut him slack and then slammed him hard.  Was that a tactic?  Rudy Croes said it was.  Now Rudy says they are using Paulus to get at Joran.  Is he not the Minister?  What is he doing talking to Gerardo?  

I am talking about perception here.  I am in no position to judge any of it.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: absolut on June 25, 2005, 11:41:07 PM
Quote from: "Selena"
Nat was at the BOYZIIMEN concert, Soul Festival.


Before 9:30 or after.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: bobntexas on June 25, 2005, 11:41:38 PM
Companzi stated:

"Also Deepak does not end work at 10pm, according to the mom he finishes at 11pm."


Actually the Internet Cafe closes at 10 p.m. on Sunday according to the sign on the door that was shown on Fox News.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Arlee on June 25, 2005, 11:42:11 PM
goon squad wrote:
 
"<<Or, in other words... who MISLEAD the investigation since the beginning.>>

Yeah, like no searches tied to JVDS and the Kalpoes for a week and a half... totally Jug's call!"

What?  I don't understand what you're saying...?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: boxopen on June 25, 2005, 11:42:14 PM
Quote from: "friend of monkeys"
WTF have u been???
I'm almost at 1,000....
LOL... I saw that :D But I haven't too much patience to spend my time hearing only SIDED opinions.
I'm furious when I see "Tupperware" brainstorms :roll: so... I take my "papers" and go to the beach :wink:


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: tkubi7 on June 25, 2005, 11:42:33 PM
Quote from: "coco"
Compananzi - I'm not sure I follow your post but I do feel queazy about the speed of response from the Natalee's parents and the level of it. I could imagine Beth and Jug flying in to "wait for Natalee" and ask questions and push the police to investigate but there's something about Jug and 5 buddies (I think that's what he said the other night) and the FBI and the DEA all descending that fast - coupled with the complete shutdown of any negative info or even informational info from MB students that sits in the back of my mind nagging. Not even speculating here, just recording uneasiness on this score.


Could be because they know their daughter and she would NEVER do something like this. They had a friend arrange a private charter so they could leave immediately. I'm sure, by the time they got there the police were involved already on a missing person report by the chaperones/hotel personnel and I will bet my tutu Beth spoke with Natalees friends too. Only makes sense. Because she was an American, the FBI was notified and it may even have been through the Aruban Police that they were notified.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: arubagirl on June 25, 2005, 11:42:41 PM
iquitos, I have no idea what did idiot is doing talking to Geraldo.

As for his former colleagues...I don't see where a colleague would demand such loyalty, I know that I'm not that loyal to my current ones.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: friend of monkeys on June 25, 2005, 11:43:00 PM
Quote from: "arubagirl"
Daniel, for real? Wow, didn't know that.

Kipster, urm, it's a backyard. To take a picture I would have to go the back of the house. I'm pretty sure that the walls are high, and my camera can't take pictures through walls, so that's not going to happen.


u r funny!!!!
lolololololololollo
why don't i go to kennedy compund ???


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: iquitos on June 25, 2005, 11:43:21 PM
Quote from: "Compananzi"
Quote from: "writenow"
Quote from: "heartache"
nikki... it was a question. And one I think I can answer. No, the damn beach has not been dug up and if there were cadaver dogs in Aruba then the Texans would not be bringing them.


OK. Didn't the LE dig up the beach at the Marriott (forgot to add that to timeline)? With the too-happy panty guy and the radio station calling for diggers in the morning before the LE got there in the afternoon? Hasn't this area been thoroughly searched? Tuesday June 14.



Also I think Nat was on de palm tours on the 29th, from 930 - 2 pm.  I don't think all 140 MB students could jump on this boat.

Also Deepak does not end work at 10pm, according to the mom he finishes at 11pm.

Also the Soul beach Festival was from 7-11pm. starring Lauryn Hill..Nat could have been there..


so you have this all in one place, was Anita already questioned?  why does jug not know it or does he want more?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: nancy_drew on June 25, 2005, 11:43:24 PM
Quote from: "Compananzi"
Quote from: "writenow"
Quote from: "heartache"
nikki... it was a question. And one I think I can answer. No, the damn beach has not been dug up and if there were cadaver dogs in Aruba then the Texans would not be bringing them.


OK. Didn't the LE dig up the beach at the Marriott (forgot to add that to timeline)? With the too-happy panty guy and the radio station calling for diggers in the morning before the LE got there in the afternoon? Hasn't this area been thoroughly searched? Tuesday June 14.



Also I think Nat was on de palm tours on the 29th, from 930 - 2 pm.  I don't think all 140 MB students could jump on this boat.

Also Deepak does not end work at 10pm, according to the mom he finishes at 11pm.

Also the Soul beach Festival was from 7-11pm. starring Lauryn Hill..Nat could have been there..


Natalee was said to not have taken the cruise but went snorkeling.  Depak's mother was very clear, his quiting time was not usually when he left.  Many times he worked later to help.  She had no difinitive time as she didn't know.

Why couldn't Natalee have attended the concert? She could have gone early to see some of the music and left.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Compananzi on June 25, 2005, 11:43:52 PM
Quote from: "Ladyhawke112"
Quote from: "bobntexas"
Companzi stated:"I think its a bit disgusting to see Jug smile with glee at Paul's arrest. He'll probably be so happy if they charge AVDS as well. "

I suspect Jug was reacting with the manner PVDS obstructed the investigation the first night.


Regarding Jug's description of PVDS' and Deepak's obstruction the first night, in how (I assume) they both were telling JVDS (who Jug says wanted to help) "not to say anything." I personally think that is really why PVDS was arrested. But more curiously to me, how does Jug's description of that night jive with  Beth's, who claimed that JVDS was rude and arrogant to her?


It would not surprise me the posey that came down was tired, angry and focused all their frustration right or wrongly on PVDS and JVDS.  Having people yell obscenities and accusing you of kidnapping might I say might raise some one to be defensive.  I do not see anything strange the way the Van Sloots acted and being the law gear head that Paul is its natural that training kicks in.  Whether you are innocent or not the best thing is to keep quiet and let the lawyers do the talking.   PVDS, did say to Jug " you have no manners" I think that might have been a reference to his fould mouth sailor vocabulary...just my opinion.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: writenow on June 25, 2005, 11:44:24 PM
Quote from: "Selena"
This mat be moot,but PVDS was not working prior to NH's appearence on the island. He was trying to get some type of position in the justice dept, clerical or something to that nature. People have posted that a part time judge doesn't make a very hefty salary anyway, but he was out of work. His wife is a teacher. Who was paying for nights out on the town and gambling? And was Mrs in Holland for a week? that would have menat the other two children were home, at school all week? Does anyone know?


Maybe everyone but Joran went to Holland. it was some kind of family thing and Paul may have tied it in with work-related issues. Maybe he came back alone Sunday and Mom came back with the 2 younger boys wednesday. Because remember that post on Valentijn's website telling him to have fun in Holland? (or something like that)


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: absolut on June 25, 2005, 11:44:55 PM
Quote
I'm sure, by the time they got there the police were involved already on a missing person report by the chaperones/hotel personnel


We have stories from early on that this was not the case. The police were willling to wait 48 hours. It took the info from the family and the reaction of the VDS pair to get the report.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Kipster on June 25, 2005, 11:45:03 PM
>>Kipster, urm, it's a backyard. To take a picture I would have to go the back of the house. I'm pretty sure that the walls are high, and my camera can't take pictures through walls, so that's not going to happen.

Urm, sorry, most American backyards are not walled compounds. One of those periscope digicams and a ladder coming your way via container ship. :)


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: friend of monkeys on June 25, 2005, 11:45:20 PM
Quote from: "boxopen"
Quote from: "friend of monkeys"
WTF have u been???
I'm almost at 1,000....
LOL... I saw that :D But I haven't too much patience to spend my time hearing only SIDED opinions.
I'm furious when I see "Tupperware" brainstorms :roll: so... I take my "papers" and go to the beach :wink:


yeah-nice job if u can get it!!!
u must know TTown Mike....LAZYASSS he said it himself!!!!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Selena on June 25, 2005, 11:45:21 PM
THe first reports said she went to the BOYZIIMEN concert, and then out to eat at CnC's. I'm not sure of the timeline.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: wantsanswers on June 25, 2005, 11:45:43 PM
Quote from: "Ladyhawke112"
Quote from: "bobntexas"
Companzi stated:"I think its a bit disgusting to see Jug smile with glee at Paul's arrest. He'll probably be so happy if they charge AVDS as well. "

I suspect Jug was reacting with the manner PVDS obstructed the investigation the first night.


Regarding Jug's description of PVDS' and Deepak's obstruction the first night, in how (I assume) they both were telling JVDS (who Jug says wanted to help) "not to say anything." I personally think that is really why PVDS was arrested. But more curiously to me, how does Jug's description of that night jive with  Beth's, who claimed that JVDS was rude and arrogant to her?


It wanted to help in the beginning, before he father told him to shut up. After the heated arguments and her mother was clutching Natalee's picture, she said she wanted her daughter, that is when he said What do you want me to do about it. It was during the heated discussion before they left.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: DT on June 25, 2005, 11:46:22 PM
Quote from: "coco"
Compananzi - I'm not sure I follow your post but I do feel queazy about the speed of response from the Natalee's parents and the level of it. I could imagine Beth and Jug flying in to "wait for Natalee" and ask questions and push the police to investigate but there's something about Jug and 5 buddies (I think that's what he said the other night) and the FBI and the DEA all descending that fast - coupled with the complete shutdown of any negative info or even informational info from MB students that sits in the back of my mind nagging. Not even speculating here, just recording uneasiness on this score.



Some of you guys are really grasping at straws here.

Of course her parents are going to fly down their the first chance they get.  They know their daughter and if they feel that she is not the type of person to be late or irresponsible then they are going to go and try and find her as soon as they can when they find out she is missing.

Too my knowledge their hasnt been a shutdown of any negative info, only that their isn't really any to report.  By all accounts she seems to be a fairly good person.  Sticking up for your daughter/friend and saying that she is a good person is hardly a shutdown of any negative info.  ANd actually a lot of the MB students have given info.  From the interviews on Fox to interviews they have done with local papers.  Hardly a shutdown on information.  

The DEA agent was already in the island for an unrelated reason and was in the best position to help the family that is why he was involved.  

As to the FBI who knows?  Maybe the family has connections.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: boxopen on June 25, 2005, 11:46:27 PM
Quote from: "Scott"
If Joran were to turn 18 before he is charged with murder, could he then be tried as an adult?
Technicaly what "counts" is the date of the "crime".


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: OldFart on June 25, 2005, 11:46:47 PM
Quote from: "absolut"
Quote from: "OldFart"
Do we know if LE ever took anyone back to the beach drop off spot(if there was one) to look for any evidance?


I would have JVDS out there every night at 3am in the dark. Then place a tape over loud speakers with Natalees voice.


My point was if LE has not indcated where the drop off on the  was by searchng a particular area they may think the Beach story is another Lie
Where is  the beach from the area oidentifed on the time line.(HOW was THIS IDENTIFIED)
6:30 am Call to or from Joran’s cellphone in area of Santa Lucia

"I would have JVDS out there every night at 3am in the dark. Then place a tape over loud speakers with Natalees voice." Your are too nice Let BTh or Jug spend 15-30 min, with him.

BTW has anyone aked for a POLY to prove they are not Lying?


THNKS


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Charlotte on June 25, 2005, 11:47:01 PM
As far as the shut down of information from the MB students, I don't think that anyone is telling them not to talk.  I think that it is their choice to do this.  They have got to be feeling guilty about what happened to her and therefore at this point are being very protective of her and not saying anything that would put her or her family in a bad light.


Title: Bo no Tin Manera= You have no Manners
Post by: Compananzi on June 25, 2005, 11:47:02 PM
Quote from: "writenow"
Quote from: "Selena"
This mat be moot,but PVDS was not working prior to NH's appearence on the island. He was trying to get some type of position in the justice dept, clerical or something to that nature. People have posted that a part time judge doesn't make a very hefty salary anyway, but he was out of work. His wife is a teacher. Who was paying for nights out on the town and gambling? And was Mrs in Holland for a week? that would have menat the other two children were home, at school all week? Does anyone know?


Maybe everyone but Joran went to Holland. it was some kind of family thing and Paul may have tied it in with work-related issues. Maybe he came back alone Sunday and Mom came back with the 2 younger boys wednesday. Because remember that post on Valentijn's website telling him to have fun in Holland? (or something like that)


Can you imagine Paul coming to Aruba at 5pm sunday, then less then 10 hours later all hell breaks loose?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: arubagirl on June 25, 2005, 11:47:48 PM
Per this link: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,160231,00.html

VAN SUSTEREN: Have you spoken to any of her friends that saw her on May 30 because she left Carlos and Charlie's?

TWITTY: Not in person. I really have not.

---

Am I supposed to think that she didn't speak to them at all or that she spoke to them via phone?
[/url]


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Scott on June 25, 2005, 11:48:49 PM
Does anyone know if the Aruban authorities or the FBI has the full archive of Joran's websites before they were altered or taken down?

If, in fact, Joran drugged and raped Natalee, it is quite plausible that she was not the first victim; just the first to die.

If the names of the American girls whose photos appear on his sites can be identified, they should each be contacted and asked the nature of their relations and contact with him.  

I would be most curious to know which of these girls recall spending their last night in Aruba with Joran.

I believe his MO would be to prey upon already intoxicated girls who would have a murky recollection and questionable credibility.

Even if Natalee's death was drug-induced but unintentional, Joran may well have tried to cover it up because it's unlikely to be perceived as consensual if Natalee was a virgin prior to that night.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: writenow on June 25, 2005, 11:49:26 PM
Quote from: "absolut"
Is it true on top of it that Beth was in Arkansas and had to drive home first?


I think that's what the "People" article says. She tried to get a police escort and couldn't, so she was doing 110 mph and got pulled over, told them what had happened and then I think she got an escort.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: absolut on June 25, 2005, 11:49:46 PM
Quote
Your are too nice Let BTh or Jug spend 15-30 min, with him.


I am a big fan of non violent passive torture. Natalees voice on that beach at the same time every night would be a sound that would kill him inside.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Compananzi on June 25, 2005, 11:49:55 PM
Quote from: "Charlotte"
As far as the shut down of information from the MB students, I don't think that anyone is telling them not to talk.  I think that it is their choice to do this.  They have got to be feeling guilty about what happened to her and therefore at this point are being very protective of her and not saying anything that would put her or her family in a bad light.


I think that interview with O'Reilly was very revealing, the male MB appears much more open and honest and not trying to paint some kinda of Stepford image of Nat.  We learned from his info and Bill's questions the following.
1. nat and Joran met days prior maybe up to 3 days before the dissapearance.
2. The played poker together.
3. He did not see anthing wrong with Nat and Joran hanging out at CnC


Title: Slacker Papa?
Post by: Itawamba on June 25, 2005, 11:50:15 PM
What is this story today about Paulus being unemployed?  

He was appointed to his KABNA job in January, 2003, for a period of three years.  There, he was deputy member of the Common Court of Justice of the N.A. and Aruba, serving as under-secretary to the Attorney-General.

While he was doing this job, he was also studying for a judgeship and had taken the entrance tests once without passing, so he had been given a few cases to hear part-time (3-4 per month, I read somewhere) in preparation for again trying for a full-time judgeship.

So, where did they get that he was unemployed while he was doing this?  He still had his regular job, he was just trying to move up and hadn't made it yet.

I know Geraldo "announced" tonight that Paulus flunked the judge tests a week before Natalee went to Aruba, and that he had no job, but isn't this just like all the other bologna Geraldo mis-announced last time he was in Aruba?

Last week, before PvdS was *detained* but while all this was going on, Anita said that they had taken Paulus's cases away from him--and he was without work--but as I see it, all this latest stuff was because of the case.  Someone had loaned him a nice Mercedes he was driving every day and they *said* he was going to work in it.

Strange that much of GR's story is the one we already heard, except PvdS was *not* unemployed.  This smells a bit.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: wantsanswers on June 25, 2005, 11:50:55 PM
Quote from: "DT"
Quote from: "coco"
Compananzi - I'm not sure I follow your post but I do feel queazy about the speed of response from the Natalee's parents and the level of it. I could imagine Beth and Jug flying in to "wait for Natalee" and ask questions and push the police to investigate but there's something about Jug and 5 buddies (I think that's what he said the other night) and the FBI and the DEA all descending that fast - coupled with the complete shutdown of any negative info or even informational info from MB students that sits in the back of my mind nagging. Not even speculating here, just recording uneasiness on this score.



Some of you guys are really grasping at straws here.

Of course her parents are going to fly down their the first chance they get.  They know their daughter and if they feel that she is not the type of person to be late or irresponsible then they are going to go and try and find her as soon as they can when they find out she is missing.

Too my knowledge their hasnt been a shutdown of any negative info, only that their isn't really any to report.  By all accounts she seems to be a fairly good person.  Sticking up for your daughter/friend and saying that she is a good person is hardly a shutdown of any negative info.  ANd actually a lot of the MB students have given info.  From the interviews on Fox to interviews they have done with local papers.  Hardly a shutdown on information.  

The DEA agent was already in the island for an unrelated reason and was in the best position to help the family that is why he was involved.  

As to the FBI who knows?  Maybe the family has connections.


They are friends with Jeff Sessions, I think he is a senator.
Coco, would you not do the same for your daughter or son? I would walk on water, I would even kill for my child. Unless it happens to you, you cannot understand the pain and having to do something right then, You can not sit back and wait, the first 48 hours are the most crucial. I would call on anyone I new to help, they are just fortunate to have many friends and also ones with healthy bank accounts that can help them.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: sb on June 25, 2005, 11:52:01 PM
arubagirl, I think they went directly to the VDS house because the evidence they had was that Joran was the guy Natalee had met before. There was...and IS... NO evidence, not ONE SHRED, that Natalee had seen or met the Kalpoes before and for all we know, she thought they were taxi drivers.


Title: Re: Bo no Tin Manera= You have no Manners
Post by: friend of monkeys on June 25, 2005, 11:52:04 PM
Quote from: "Compananzi"
Quote from: "writenow"
Quote from: "Selena"
This mat be moot,but PVDS was not working prior to NH's appearence on the island. He was trying to get some type of position in the justice dept, clerical or something to that nature. People have posted that a part time judge doesn't make a very hefty salary anyway, but he was out of work. His wife is a teacher. Who was paying for nights out on the town and gambling? And was Mrs in Holland for a week? that would have menat the other two children were home, at school all week? Does anyone know?


Maybe everyone but Joran went to Holland. it was some kind of family thing and Paul may have tied it in with work-related issues. Maybe he came back alone Sunday and Mom came back with the 2 younger boys wednesday. Because remember that post on Valentijn's website telling him to have fun in Holland? (or something like that)


Can you imagine Paul coming to Aruba at 5pm sunday, then less then 10 hours later all hell breaks loose?



maybe...so then as R? would say......
come on down Anita!!

and also
Rob is currently in aruba and absolut asked earlier if there were any special requests....
so far...shark feed place/ north lighthouse/marriot beach at night....
interestingly dark I imagine...

any other requests????


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Selena on June 25, 2005, 11:52:16 PM
That's interesting because that's the first I heard that Paulus may have gone and returned early. First AVDS said she was gone for the weekend, then the week. I think there were some off days earlier in the month for staff, just wondered why she would be out of town during the week before finals if she taught and had children in school.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: CaliGirl on June 25, 2005, 11:52:34 PM
Quote from: "iquitos"
so you have this all in one place, was Anita already questioned?  why does jug not know it or does he want more?


I am curious, (and not to start the whole "don't blame the victim because I think we all know I would never do that) does anyone realize that if this crime happened in teh US the Twitty's and Holloway's would be throughly investigated as normal procedure?

I am kind of curious as to why everyone thought it was such an outrageous thought for anyone to have suiggested it. I mean in the US they would have already raided Natalee's room etc etc looking for any clues and leaving no stone unturned.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: arubagirl on June 25, 2005, 11:52:47 PM
Compananzi, per this link: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,160385,00.html, her friends say that she first met Joran  on the night of May 29th into May 30th. May 30th is when she was supposed to fly home.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: DT on June 25, 2005, 11:52:49 PM
Quote from: "Compananzi"
Quote from: "Charlotte"
As far as the shut down of information from the MB students, I don't think that anyone is telling them not to talk.  I think that it is their choice to do this.  They have got to be feeling guilty about what happened to her and therefore at this point are being very protective of her and not saying anything that would put her or her family in a bad light.


I think that interview with O'Reilly was very revealing, the male MB appears much more open and honest and not trying to paint some kinda of Stepford image of Nat.  We learned from his info and Bill's questions the following.
1. nat and Joran met days prior maybe up to 3 days before the dissapearance.
2. The played poker together.
3. He did not see anthing wrong with Nat and Joran hanging out at CnC


No one is painting a stepford image of Natalee.  They are saying she was a good girl who was responsible, smart and level-headed.  No one has said that she was perfect.  And none of the points you listed would even contradict a stepford (unrealistic) image of her.  Is it so hard for people to believe that she was a good person?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: writenow on June 25, 2005, 11:52:58 PM
Quote from: "Scott"
Does anyone know when Joran's birthday is?

My understanding is that no one has yet been formally arraigned.

If Joran were to turn 18 before he is charged with murder, could he then be tried as an adult?


born Aug. 6, 1987


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: OldFart on June 25, 2005, 11:53:27 PM
Quote from: "absolut"
Quote
Your are too nice Let BTh or Jug spend 15-30 min, with him.


I am a big fan of non violent passive torture. Natalees voice on that beach at the same time every night would be a sound that would kill him inside.


I see what you are saying...   I still think that BTH could get some info from him.  JUG would of course be that absolut (no pun) resort.

But Lhas Le been in particular are of the beach.

thnks


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Charlotte on June 25, 2005, 11:54:31 PM
I'm sure Beth Twitty has spoken with kids on the trip.  The article in the July 4 issue of People magazine mentions that Jug spoke with Natalee's cousins Thomas and Hunter Twitty who were on the trip and learned that Thomas has played poker with Joran that same night.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: klaasend on June 25, 2005, 11:54:41 PM
Quote from: "arubagirl"
Compananzi, per this link: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,160385,00.html, her friends say that she first met Joran  on the night of May 29th into May 30th. May 30th is when she was supposed to fly home.

But, since her friends obviously didn't know where she was at all times, isn't it possible she met Joran before 5/29?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Kipster on June 25, 2005, 11:54:48 PM
arubagirl:
>>Am I supposed to think that she didn't speak to them at all or that she spoke to them via phone?

Pretty obvious the FBI spoke to them and told her what to say.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: LilOrphan on June 25, 2005, 11:55:18 PM
Quote from: "arubagirl"
if Paul van der Sloot heard something (i.e. NH talking) or saw something, he has to tell.

If Joran told him something (dad, this is what happened to her), then he doesn't have to tell.


Arubagirl, have you heard any rumor that Joran is literally biting his tongue to make himself unable to speak? A source elsewhere (who has been almost as reliable as you) stated it a few times. He did not confirm or deny when someone translated it as being in the literal sense, and did refer to it as the boy's poor bloody tongue.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: iquitos on June 25, 2005, 11:55:21 PM
Quote from: "sb"
Jug and Beth Twitty are the kind of people who're determined to find their daughter and they really don't care too much what anyone thinks of why or how they go about it! They are VICTIMS and they don't need all the finger-pointing at them right now. They are more worried about RESULTS than IMAGE.


You are so right but they are not home, they are in a foreign country with a different legal system and their antics can backfire on them.  What, for example if they change the venue to a less vulnerable place, like the Netherlands.  Would they have as easy a time of bullying there.  Beth could stay in Aruba to find her daughter but all the action would be somewhere else.  Somebody said sugar works better than vinegar or something like that.  They can pressure in camera but should be careful publicly.  Note the stark contrast between Mr. Hollaway and Mr. Twitty.  I think Holloway will get further than Twitty with the locals.  BTW, there is such a thing as too much media face time by the principles.  Sometimes it is better to dose that out and use a spokesperson.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: wantsanswers on June 25, 2005, 11:55:38 PM
Quote from: "CaliGirl"
Quote from: "iquitos"
so you have this all in one place, was Anita already questioned?  why does jug not know it or does he want more?


I am curious, (and not to start the whole "don't blame the victim because I think we all know I would never do that) does anyone realize that if this crime happened in teh US the Twitty's and Holloway's would be throughly investigated as normal procedure?

I am kind of curious as to why everyone thought it was such an outrageous thought for anyone to have suiggested it. I mean in the US they would have already raided Natalee's room etc etc looking for any clues and leaving no stone unturned.


Because they were not there on the island at her disappearance. I am sure they check her computer, room, everything a t her home. remember they were there talking to her friends and relatives and kids from the trip


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Selena on June 25, 2005, 11:56:27 PM
I have a gov report by a committe expressing concerns that 16-18 y.o.'s can be tried as adults according to the nature of the crime. Unless the laws have he could be tried as an adult relative to the nature of the charge, like in US.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: arubagirl on June 25, 2005, 11:56:29 PM
The FBI told Beth Twitty what to say? I'm not following you, kipster.

But she introduced herself to him, klaassend, so I'm taking that as a first meeting.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: friend of monkeys on June 25, 2005, 11:56:29 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "arubagirl"
Compananzi, per this link: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,160385,00.html, her friends say that she first met Joran  on the night of May 29th into May 30th. May 30th is when she was supposed to fly home.

But, since her friends obviously didn't know where she was at all times, isn't it possible she met Joran before 5/29?


maybe on-line??? what a shock!!!


p/s
 :lol:  I WANT MY T SHIRT!!!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: writenow on June 25, 2005, 11:56:56 PM
Quote from: "arubagirl"
Well, Sb, I'm curious why she went to JvdS house, and not for example the Kalpoe's house.


because the kids (and Natalee's twin cousins) from MBHS recognized Joran as someone they'd seen before at the casino and some saw her get in the car with him. the twins played poker with him. Joran had to sign in for the game he played at the casino. that's how they got his name. asked for his address. went there. Don't think they knew about the Kalpoes until they meet Deepak at the v.d.Sloots.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: DT on June 25, 2005, 11:57:17 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "arubagirl"
Compananzi, per this link: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,160385,00.html, her friends say that she first met Joran  on the night of May 29th into May 30th. May 30th is when she was supposed to fly home.

But, since her friends obviously didn't know where she was at all times, isn't it possible she met Joran before 5/29?


That is what I think, and it makes sense given what was earlier said about them meeting 2 days before.  
But with all the misinformation flying around who knows?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: arubagirl on June 25, 2005, 11:58:02 PM
Lil, I haven't heard anything of the sort. Not to say that's not true.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: nancy_drew on June 25, 2005, 11:58:11 PM
Quote from: "Compananzi"
Quote from: "Charlotte"
As far as the shut down of information from the MB students, I don't think that anyone is telling them not to talk.  I think that it is their choice to do this.  They have got to be feeling guilty about what happened to her and therefore at this point are being very protective of her and not saying anything that would put her or her family in a bad light.


I think that interview with O'Reilly was very revealing, the male MB appears much more open and honest and not trying to paint some kinda of Stepford image of Nat.  We learned from his info and Bill's questions the following.
1. nat and Joran met days prior maybe up to 3 days before the dissapearance.
2. The played poker together.
3. He did not see anthing wrong with Nat and Joran hanging out at CnC


I think many more kids would have to be interviewed, as the FBI did, before I would make any firm statement.  Kids see different things at different times from different perspectives.  Two kids is too few to get a good timeline.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: absolut on June 25, 2005, 11:58:32 PM
Quote from: "sb"
arubagirl, I think they went directly to the VDS house because the evidence they had was that Joran was the guy Natalee had met before. There was...and IS... NO evidence, not ONE SHRED, that Natalee had seen or met the Kalpoes before and for all we know, she thought they were taxi drivers.


Her close friends interveiwed said at 12:30 Joran and his friends came into CNC and it was the brothers with him.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: heartache on June 25, 2005, 11:59:13 PM
Who gives a RAT'S ASS when NH and Baby met? What the hell difference does it make. Lacy Peterson knew the person who killed her pretty darn well.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Compananzi on June 25, 2005, 11:59:13 PM
Quote from: "DT"
Quote from: "coco"
Compananzi - I'm not sure I follow your post but I do feel queazy about the speed of response from the Natalee's parents and the level of it. I could imagine Beth and Jug flying in to "wait for Natalee" and ask questions and push the police to investigate but there's something about Jug and 5 buddies (I think that's what he said the other night) and the FBI and the DEA all descending that fast - coupled with the complete shutdown of any negative info or even informational info from MB students that sits in the back of my mind nagging. Not even speculating here, just recording uneasiness on this score.



Some of you guys are really grasping at straws here.

Of course her parents are going to fly down their the first chance they get.  They know their daughter and if they feel that she is not the type of person to be late or irresponsible then they are going to go and try and find her as soon as they can when they find out she is missing.

Too my knowledge their hasnt been a shutdown of any negative info, only that their isn't really any to report.  By all accounts she seems to be a fairly good person.  Sticking up for your daughter/friend and saying that she is a good person is hardly a shutdown of any negative info.  ANd actually a lot of the MB students have given info.  From the interviews on Fox to interviews they have done with local papers.  Hardly a shutdown on information.  

The DEA agent was already in the island for an unrelated reason and was in the best position to help the family that is why he was involved.  

As to the FBI who knows?  Maybe the family has connections.


Any ideas why if the whole family know that JVDS was the prime suspect that a lame poster was sent out and the first tv appearance was in the similar vane? (confirmed info) I need a good explanation so I can rest it aside..

http://www.geocities.com/dutch_on_aruba/nhposteraruba.jpg.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: mia on June 25, 2005, 11:59:16 PM
Quote from: "writenow"
Quote from: "absolut"
Is it true on top of it that Beth was in Arkansas and had to drive home first?


I think that's what the "People" article says. She tried to get a police escort and couldn't, so she was doing 110 mph and got pulled over, told them what had happened and then I think she got an escort.


I wonder why they didn't fly over  to Arkansas and pick her up on their way to Aruba???  Seems like Arkansas would be a pretty long drive to Birmingham.  Over 5 hours, I'm sure.  Maybe more like 8-10 hours.  What part of Arkansas did she drive from?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: wantsanswers on June 25, 2005, 11:59:33 PM
Quote from: "arubagirl"
Compananzi, per this link: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,160385,00.html, her friends say that she first met Joran  on the night of May 29th into May 30th. May 30th is when she was supposed to fly home.


I think those girls were flakes. Dash and others saw them talking on other days.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: natfortplum on June 26, 2005, 12:00:00 AM
could someone tell me how long the plane ride is from Holland to Aruba? Thanks in advance.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: iquitos on June 26, 2005, 12:00:18 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "arubagirl"
Compananzi, per this link: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,160385,00.html, her friends say that she first met Joran  on the night of May 29th into May 30th. May 30th is when she was supposed to fly home.

But, since her friends obviously didn't know where she was at all times, isn't it possible she met Joran before 5/29?


the kid on o'reilly with dash said he was around all week or something like that.  i don't think the scuffle in the casino if it happend would have gone uncommented by all.  maybe if she didn't know him she knew of him.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Blue on June 26, 2005, 12:00:21 AM
Quote from: "arubagirl"
If Jug said that, and AvdS is going to be detained, then I guess we know who's running the show.

AvdS wasn't on the island, so she couldn't see/hear anything. And anything that JvdS told her she doesn't have to reveal, so basically, there is no point.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: nancy_drew on June 26, 2005, 12:00:25 AM
Quote from: "absolut"
Quote from: "sb"
arubagirl, I think they went directly to the VDS house because the evidence they had was that Joran was the guy Natalee had met before. There was...and IS... NO evidence, not ONE SHRED, that Natalee had seen or met the Kalpoes before and for all we know, she thought they were taxi drivers.


Her close friends interveiwed said at 12:30 Joran and his friends came into CNC and it was the brothers with him.


Really? I missed that...when did they say that?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: absolut on June 26, 2005, 12:00:38 AM
Quote from: "CaliGirl"
Quote from: "iquitos"
so you have this all in one place, was Anita already questioned?  why does jug not know it or does he want more?


I am curious, (and not to start the whole "don't blame the victim because I think we all know I would never do that) does anyone realize that if this crime happened in teh US the Twitty's and Holloway's would be throughly investigated as normal procedure?

I am kind of curious as to why everyone thought it was such an outrageous thought for anyone to have suiggested it. I mean in the US they would have already raided Natalee's room etc etc looking for any clues and leaving no stone unturned.


Someone posted earlier that this is not only used to elminate or include suspects but to build a better idea of who the victim is so it is better known, what scenarios are even viable.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: bigpoodle on June 26, 2005, 12:01:47 AM
Quote from: "SunnyinTX"
Quote from: "arubagirl"
If Jug said that, and AvdS is going to be detained, then I guess we know who's running the show.

AvdS wasn't on the island, so she couldn't see/hear anything. And anything that JvdS told her she doesn't have to reveal, so basically, there is no point.


I ws shocked when he said that....that poor woman has been through enough.....I know many will not agree with me....but it's my opinion.  Certainly it doesn't compare to what Beth and family have been and are still going through....but as Arubagirl says...anything she might know (and I doubt she knows a thing) would be protected. As far as her being the easiest to break...I think not....remember she would be the lioness is protecting her cub...

JM thoughts


I think there may be something very wrong with Jughead.  Must be a treat to be married to and a step-daughter of a mean bully like him. JMHO


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: coco on June 26, 2005, 12:01:53 AM
DT - I understand what you are saying ... I've just been going around in my head trying to figure out how I would have acted if it was my daughter and all I know is that she missed her flight and didn't show up at the hotel. I'm not sure - and I know that by the next day for example I would have been in lioness mode ... I'm just uneasy with the speed at which things went from Natalee missed her flight to confrontations at the VDS house.  

I really respect Beth for her fierceness and her speaking up for the security guards and for her civility to the aruban people which is what led me to get interested in the case and start reading her obsessively. And I'm sure Natalee is a wonderful girl. I just really don't like the tone that comes from Jug and I am uncomfortable with some of this.

I think there's something about the assumption that "I know my daughter would never do anything irresponsible so I know you kidnapped her" that makes some little piece of me go hunh? And there's something in Jug's style that reminds me of problematic dads - completely different from what I get from David Holloway who seems to shun the spotlight and focus on the search ... I don't know.

...and I am uncomfortable with the feeling that even thinking these things is somehow blaming the victim or such instead of just another avenue for speculation and self-examination. I honestly find myself thinking Ok, if I got a call that my dtr missed a flight home from Jamaica, what would be my assumptions? It makes me think about things like what do I assume about my own kids, what do I "know" with the level of certainty people ascribe to Beth, etc.

Really just trying to think this through in my own head ... and trying to be honest.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Selena on June 26, 2005, 12:02:03 AM
The Brian Reynolds on the trip who was at CnC's. Could that have been one of her cousins? She had twin cousins on the trip. He ws the one who saw the shoving match,..and I'm sorry, these questions are on my mind. If so, why wasn't that known?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: sb on June 26, 2005, 12:02:33 AM
Quote from: "Selena"
THe first reports said she went to the BOYZIIMEN concert, and then out to eat at CnC's. I'm not sure of the timeline.


Selena, that beach concert thing troubles me too. The stories of the 3 guys and the stories of Natalee's closest friends all have her at the HI at 9:30 meeting Joran for the first time. At which time he supposedly says it's Sunday night, it's slow, nobody goes out, I have no plans etc.  Now I am NOT an expert on teen music at all but I have heard of Boyz2Men and if they were holding a concert that night, everybody and their grandmother on that island under 30 was GUARANTEED to be there where it was GOIN' ON! The word was that AFTER the MBers left the concert, they went to CC's.

I am HIGHLY sceptical of the Sunday night timeframe until Natalee et al. were at CC's. I contend that the Joran meeting was much earlier in the day and I have no earthly idea why people are saying 9:30 PM.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: mia on June 26, 2005, 12:02:33 AM
Quote from: "wantsanswers"
Quote from: "arubagirl"
Compananzi, per this link: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,160385,00.html, her friends say that she first met Joran  on the night of May 29th into May 30th. May 30th is when she was supposed to fly home.


I think those girls were flakes. Dash and others saw them talking on other days.


Why didn't the Aruban police hold all those kids for questioning?  They may have missed something by letting them leave.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: absolut on June 26, 2005, 12:03:29 AM
Quote from: "Charlotte"
I'm sure Beth Twitty has spoken with kids on the trip.  The article in the July 4 issue of People magazine mentions that Jug spoke with Natalee's cousins Thomas and Hunter Twitty who were on the trip and learned that Thomas has played poker with Joran that same night.


And I bet he got beat by Joran too, now is that when the confrontation was?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: columbo on June 26, 2005, 12:03:37 AM
Quote from: "arubagirl"
Per this link: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,160231,00.html

VAN SUSTEREN: Have you spoken to any of her friends that saw her on May 30 because she left Carlos and Charlie's?

TWITTY: Not in person. I really have not.

---

Am I supposed to think that she didn't speak to them at all or that she spoke to them via phone?
[/url]


I've been perplexed by this too, Arubagirl. Since day 1, the Holloway's have claimed they haven't spoken to any of her friends. How is that possible? It bothers me. I understand they don't want to interfere with the investigation, but aside from the few students who have been interviewed, we don't have any eye witness accounts (as far as we know) and the Holloways keep saying they haven't spoken to any of the students. Just doens't make sense to me.  ??


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Compananzi on June 26, 2005, 12:03:50 AM
Quote from: "nancy_drew"
Quote from: "Compananzi"
Quote from: "writenow"
Quote from: "heartache"
nikki... it was a question. And one I think I can answer. No, the damn beach has not been dug up and if there were cadaver dogs in Aruba then the Texans would not be bringing them.


OK. Didn't the LE dig up the beach at the Marriott (forgot to add that to timeline)? With the too-happy panty guy and the radio station calling for diggers in the morning before the LE got there in the afternoon? Hasn't this area been thoroughly searched? Tuesday June 14.



Also I think Nat was on de palm tours on the 29th, from 930 - 2 pm.  I don't think all 140 MB students could jump on this boat.

Also Deepak does not end work at 10pm, according to the mom he finishes at 11pm.

Also the Soul beach Festival was from 7-11pm. starring Lauryn Hill..Nat could have been there..


Natalee was said to not have taken the cruise but went snorkeling.  Depak's mother was very clear, his quiting time was not usually when he left.  Many times he worked later to help.  She had no difinitive time as she didn't know.

Why couldn't Natalee have attended the concert? She could have gone early to see some of the music and left.


The DePalm Tours was a snorkeling tour. ..there was an early day concernt but she was on the snorkeling trip...that evening with Lauryn Hill (7 grammy awards), why not?  This is something her 'best friends can fill out'


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: GuyWdog on June 26, 2005, 12:04:17 AM
Quote
arrabba gave this list with percentages......

Run-a-way Tourist - 0%
kidnapping - 90%
Murder(many scenarios) - 40%
Drugged then Murdered - 35%
Drugged then sucumbed with no one else involved - 10%
Accidental death no one else involved(drowning) - 0%
Accidental Death Joran involved -75%
Human Trafficing - 0%
Drugged, kidnapped, raped, accidenatl death, just Joran - 95%


 I would like to add a few more scenarios of my own--

Run-A-Way Tourist -5%-(my Prayers are for this one)
Kidnapping-10%
Murder-10%-(Drugged sexually assaulted death)
Drugged then succumbed-10%-(perscription drug interaction with alcohol)
Drugged then Murdered-2%
Accidential Death no one involved-25%-(drowned after she left Joran)
Accidential Death Joran involved-36%-(She resisted advances then accident)
Human Trafficing-2%-


This is just my opinion. No facts support these theories. What are your Scenarios and percentages?


GuyWdog


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Scott on June 26, 2005, 12:04:28 AM
Quote from: "Compananzi"

Any ideas why if the whole family know that JVDS was the prime suspect that a lame poster was sent out and the first tv appearance was in the similar vane? (confirmed info) I need a good explanation so I can rest it aside..

http://www.geocities.com/dutch_on_aruba/nhposteraruba.jpg.


What if they were of the belief that Joran was responsible for turning her over to a drug dealer/kidnapper/pimp in exchange for money?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: DT on June 26, 2005, 12:04:44 AM
Quote from: "Compananzi"
Quote from: "DT"
Quote from: "coco"
Compananzi - I'm not sure I follow your post but I do feel queazy about the speed of response from the Natalee's parents and the level of it. I could imagine Beth and Jug flying in to "wait for Natalee" and ask questions and push the police to investigate but there's something about Jug and 5 buddies (I think that's what he said the other night) and the FBI and the DEA all descending that fast - coupled with the complete shutdown of any negative info or even informational info from MB students that sits in the back of my mind nagging. Not even speculating here, just recording uneasiness on this score.



Some of you guys are really grasping at straws here.

Of course her parents are going to fly down their the first chance they get.  They know their daughter and if they feel that she is not the type of person to be late or irresponsible then they are going to go and try and find her as soon as they can when they find out she is missing.

Too my knowledge their hasnt been a shutdown of any negative info, only that their isn't really any to report.  By all accounts she seems to be a fairly good person.  Sticking up for your daughter/friend and saying that she is a good person is hardly a shutdown of any negative info.  ANd actually a lot of the MB students have given info.  From the interviews on Fox to interviews they have done with local papers.  Hardly a shutdown on information.  

The DEA agent was already in the island for an unrelated reason and was in the best position to help the family that is why he was involved.  

As to the FBI who knows?  Maybe the family has connections.


Any ideas why if the whole family know that JVDS was the prime suspect that a lame poster was sent out and the first tv appearance was in the similar vane? (confirmed info) I need a good explanation so I can rest it aside..

http://www.geocities.com/dutch_on_aruba/nhposteraruba.jpg.


Who knows?  I don't see what it has to do with my post though. Maybe they thought it would appeal to peoples emotions to show the closeness she and her mother had?  I don't know if that poster has been confirmed by the way.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: CancunMole on June 26, 2005, 12:05:11 AM
Quote from: "sb"
arubagirl, I think they went directly to the VDS house because the evidence they had was that Joran was the guy Natalee had met before. There was...and IS... NO evidence, not ONE SHRED, that Natalee had seen or met the Kalpoes before and for all we know, she thought they were taxi drivers.


Yes, they went there based on what they had been told by "the quiet people". How convenient. No problem, no questions. Even Law & Order looks close to home. If the Ed kid could get friendly with a waiter/bar tender at C&C, whatever, don't you think someone else could also make connections?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Another K in Texas on June 26, 2005, 12:05:11 AM
Not in person--she was leaving to go to Aruba, they were on a plane to the US.

She easily could have talked to them on the phone.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: writenow on June 26, 2005, 12:05:15 AM
Quote from: "coco"
Compananzi - I'm not sure I follow your post but I do feel queazy about the speed of response from the Natalee's parents and the level of it. I could imagine Beth and Jug flying in to "wait for Natalee" and ask questions and push the police to investigate but there's something about Jug and 5 buddies (I think that's what he said the other night) and the FBI and the DEA all descending that fast - coupled with the complete shutdown of any negative info or even informational info from MB students that sits in the back of my mind nagging. Not even speculating here, just recording uneasiness on this score.


You know, they may have contacted the FBI in the states right away -- before they left for Aruba. The FBI could have given them tips on what to do. Plus, they could have put them in touch with other organizations who could immediately tell them what actions to take when a child is missing (Missing kids/Polly Klauss organization, etc.). These groups have it down to a tee from years of experience (unfortunately involving many kidnapped kids).


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: arubagirl on June 26, 2005, 12:05:15 AM
Sb, I didn't go. Too damn expensive.

The plane ride from Holland to Aruba is about 9 1/2 boring hours.

Have done it four times.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Selena on June 26, 2005, 12:06:35 AM
SB
There had to be a gigazillion people still on the island at that time,..and after the concert, can you imagine what it would be like to get into ANY nightspot? let alone to eat dinner...


Title: contacting FBI
Post by: dl3fan on June 26, 2005, 12:09:41 AM
I don't believe they would have called the FBI for advice before leaving because best I can remember it was Memorail Day that day.  And you that is a holiday.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: DT on June 26, 2005, 12:10:08 AM
Quote from: "coco"
DT - I understand what you are saying ... I've just been going around in my head trying to figure out how I would have acted if it was my daughter and all I know is that she missed her flight and didn't show up at the hotel. I'm not sure - and I know that by the next day for example I would have been in lioness mode ... I'm just uneasy with the speed at which things went from Natalee missed her flight to confrontations at the VDS house.  

I really respect Beth for her fierceness and her speaking up for the security guards and for her civility to the aruban people which is what led me to get interested in the case and start reading her obsessively. And I'm sure Natalee is a wonderful girl. I just really don't like the tone that comes from Jug and I am uncomfortable with some of this.

I think there's something about the assumption that "I know my daughter would never do anything irresponsible so I know you kidnapped her" that makes some little piece of me go hunh? And there's something in Jug's style that reminds me of problematic dads - completely different from what I get from David Holloway who seems to shun the spotlight and focus on the search ... I don't know.

...and I am uncomfortable with the feeling that even thinking these things is somehow blaming the victim or such instead of just another avenue for speculation and self-examination. I honestly find myself thinking Ok, if I got a call that my dtr missed a flight home from Jamaica, what would be my assumptions? It makes me think about things like what do I assume about my own kids, what do I "know" with the level of certainty people ascribe to Beth, etc.

Really just trying to think this through in my own head ... and trying to be honest.


I understand that you are just trying to be reasonable, but the thing is nothing makes sense without these guys being involved somehow.  I really can not see her running away, and not because of anything the family has said about her character.  

I don't know about you but if I had a daughter and she didn't turn up for a flight home I would be on the first flight out regardless of how she had behaved previously.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: absolut on June 26, 2005, 12:10:10 AM
Quote from: "sb"
Quote from: "Selena"
THe first reports said she went to the BOYZIIMEN concert, and then out to eat at CnC's. I'm not sure of the timeline.


Selena, that beach concert thing troubles me too. The stories of the 3 guys and the stories of Natalee's closest friends all have her at the HI at 9:30 meeting Joran for the first time. At which time he supposedly says it's Sunday night, it's slow, nobody goes out, I have no plans etc.  Now I am NOT an expert on teen music at all but I have heard of Boyz2Men and if they were holding a concert that night, everybody and their grandmother on that island under 30 was GUARANTEED to be there where it was GOIN' ON! The word was that AFTER the MBers left the concert, they went to CC's.

I am HIGHLY sceptical of the Sunday night timeframe until Natalee et al. were at CC's. I contend that the Joran meeting was much earlier in the day and I have no earthly idea why people are saying 9:30 PM.


Because Joran was in a poker tourney that started at 8pm at 9:30ish he was done and had finished 4th. Her friends said that they met after he had played poker, at the blackjack table.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: arubagirl on June 26, 2005, 12:10:24 AM
I'm sorry, but who walks around with the FBI phone number handy?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: LilOrphan on June 26, 2005, 12:10:52 AM
Quote from: "arubagirl"
Lil, I haven't heard anything of the sort. Not to say that's not true.


Thanks for the answer. The source types in metaphor and riddle, but he's usually accurate and Fox reports it, oh, five hours later. :)


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: friend of monkeys on June 26, 2005, 12:11:18 AM
Quote from: "arubagirl"
Sb, I didn't go. Too damn expensive.

The plane ride from Holland to Aruba is about 9 1/2 boring hours.

Have done it four times.


r u listening o dag???  
WTF?
"last dance" by donna summers??
all of a sudden stop/schreeechheeesses to halt/commrcial??


followed by song "GASOLINA"


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: boxopen on June 26, 2005, 12:11:24 AM
Quote from: "friend of monkeys"
u must know TTown Mike...
LOL... I already "knew (http://scaredmonkeys.com/Discussion/viewtopic.php?p=16708#16708)" him. :x


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: arubagirl on June 26, 2005, 12:11:30 AM
Well, Lil, then I would *definitely* believe the guy.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: DT on June 26, 2005, 12:12:01 AM
Quote from: "arubagirl"
I'm sorry, but who walks around with the FBI phone number handy?


Im pretty sure it would be in the phone book. Plus if they had connections ( a senator for instance) he would have no problem getting the FBI involved.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Blue on June 26, 2005, 12:12:19 AM
arubagirl wrote:
If Jug said that, and AvdS is going to be detained, then I guess we know who's running the show.

AvdS wasn't on the island, so she couldn't see/hear anything. And anything that JvdS told her she doesn't have to reveal, so basically, there is no point.


Maybe the Twittys think that AvdS could possibly have found something while cleaning. I think I remember BHT saying something about Natalee being at the Van Der Sloots house at 3:00 AM the night she went missing.
Does anyone else remember that?

Sorry I messed up the earlier try - It's my first post. :(


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: arubagirl on June 26, 2005, 12:12:43 AM
DT, huh, in the phone book? The one they have in Aruba? Not following.


Title: FBI contact page
Post by: bobntexas on June 26, 2005, 12:12:46 AM
Quote from: "arubagirl"
I'm sorry, but who walks around with the FBI phone number handy?



http://www.fbi.gov/contactus.htm


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Kipster on June 26, 2005, 12:13:00 AM
arubagirl:
>>The FBI told Beth Twitty what to say? I'm not following you, kipster.

That's my guess. :) The only thing I've walked away with on the MB folk, is that they may have been contacted/interviewd. No details--anyone?. My opinion is that when Beth was ragging the local authorities, the FBI stepped in and made her change that line with a tidbit of info and a lecture on Dutch Law. Since then every family spokesperson has exuded his and her confidence in the way ya'll are handling the case (smart move IMO). Reeks of FBI...


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: wantsanswers on June 26, 2005, 12:13:17 AM
Quote from: "coco"
DT - I understand what you are saying ... I've just been going around in my head trying to figure out how I would have acted if it was my daughter and all I know is that she missed her flight and didn't show up at the hotel. I'm not sure - and I know that by the next day for example I would have been in lioness mode ... I'm just uneasy with the speed at which things went from Natalee missed her flight to confrontations at the VDS house.  

I really respect Beth for her fierceness and her speaking up for the security guards and for her civility to the aruban people which is what led me to get interested in the case and start reading her obsessively. And I'm sure Natalee is a wonderful girl. I just really don't like the tone that comes from Jug and I am uncomfortable with some of this.

I think there's something about the assumption that "I know my daughter would never do anything irresponsible so I know you kidnapped her" that makes some little piece of me go hunh? And there's something in Jug's style that reminds me of problematic dads - completely different from what I get from David Holloway who seems to shun the spotlight and focus on the search ... I don't know.

...and I am uncomfortable with the feeling that even thinking these things is somehow blaming the victim or such instead of just another avenue for speculation and self-examination. I honestly find myself thinking Ok, if I got a call that my dtr missed a flight home from Jamaica, what would be my assumptions? It makes me think about things like what do I assume about my own kids, what do I "know" with the level of certainty people ascribe to Beth, etc.

Really just trying to think this through in my own head ... and trying to be honest.

Jug seems to be the typical hard aXX business man that is successful, No Nonsense, goes by the book, etc. I dont think he is a bully, just tired and wanting answers. Her father Dave, on the other hand, seems very kind, sweet and very depressed over losing his daughter. He did not want her to go on this trip and probably feels her let her down by not being there to help her. It is a lot to have to go through and he seems like a very private person.  If it were not for Jug and Beth, I think this would all be swept under the rug. Sometimes you have to put pressure on to get results. Believe me, I live with a man just like that...


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: heartache on June 26, 2005, 12:13:26 AM
My daughter doesn't show up for a plane ride... I call the FBI. You punch in 411 on your phone. Maybe the chaperones called them. WHO FRIGGIN cares who called them.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: arubagirl on June 26, 2005, 12:13:29 AM
So BobinTx, you think they went online to find out the number?


Title: Re: contacting FBI
Post by: absolut on June 26, 2005, 12:13:44 AM
Quote from: "dl3fan"
I don't believe they would have called the FBI for advice before leaving because best I can remember it was Memorail Day that day.  And you that is a holiday.


Good catch I didn't even think about that. That should have made all these cycles longer.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Arlee on June 26, 2005, 12:14:02 AM
Quote from: "coco"
Compananzi - I'm not sure I follow your post but I do feel queazy about the speed of response from the Natalee's parents and the level of it. I could imagine Beth and Jug flying in to "wait for Natalee" and ask questions and push the police to investigate but there's something about Jug and 5 buddies (I think that's what he said the other night) and the FBI and the DEA all descending that fast - coupled with the complete shutdown of any negative info or even informational info from MB students that sits in the back of my mind nagging. Not even speculating here, just recording uneasiness on this score.


I'm not following you.  It was my understanding that DEA already on assignment (in Aruba? a neighboring island?) were contacted due to their proximity.  I don't know how/when FBI got involved, although reports have said Beth asked police how to contact the FBI before she flew over.  What makes you uneasy about 5 friends going over to Aruba, too?

As for the MB students...  That's kind of a funny story, I think.  It involves the far-reaching effects of irresponsible media.  One of the first stories in our local paper ended with the line, "MB students will not discuss Natalee or the trip."  I was shocked!  I happened to be talking to an MB student right after that, & I asked him, "What, we aren't supposed to talk? Who said?  I didn't hear about it!  Why didn't they use the email tree (of the students/parents involved on the trip)?"  And he said, "That's funny, the reporter wrote that because of me.  I went to the prayer vigil (the first one) but got the times wrong, so no one was there practically but me and this reporter.  She asked me all kinds of questions & I kept saying, 'I can't answer.  I'm a sophomore.  I wasn't on the senior trip.  I don't know Natalee, I'm just upset and concerned for her, so that's why I showed up here.'  Then she goes back and writes, "'MB students refuse to talk.'"  Because she didn't get the answers her editor must have asked her for, she covered her rear with this unusual spin.

Ok, so like me, all the folks in MB read that & blanched because they didn't know why they weren't in the loop.  Again, we all thought, we're not supposed to talk?  Why not?  Who said?  Well, we better not!  And so most kids from then on buttoned up, & a story that started out as false became true.  Amazing!

On several occasions I've talked to Marcia Twitty & the friend helping her handle media requests.  They both emphasized that neither of them had or would tell *anyone* not to talk.  

However, the students who have been interviewed are shutting down & advising others not to step up because each & every one has gotten completely screwed over.  In some cases, they were outright lied to by producers; in others, their words were twisted & quotes used to endorse information that they'd actually *refuted* in interviews.  In all cases, they've been vilified in this and other message boards.  They've been criticized in the same forums both for talking and for *not* talking.  

Heck of a situation for kids to find themselves in.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: arubagirl on June 26, 2005, 12:14:16 AM
heartache, I care.

you punch 411 on your phone? From Aruba? Help?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: DT on June 26, 2005, 12:14:28 AM
Quote from: "arubagirl"
DT, huh, in the phone book? The one they have in Aruba? Not following.


Well they could always call home and get someone there to call the FBI, again the family seems fairly well connected.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: friend of monkeys on June 26, 2005, 12:14:28 AM
Quote from: "boxopen"
Quote from: "friend of monkeys"
u must know TTown Mike...
LOL... I already "knew (http://scaredmonkeys.com/Discussion/viewtopic.php?p=16708#16708)" him. :x


So i am behind?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: bobntexas on June 26, 2005, 12:14:39 AM
Quote from: "arubagirl"
So BobinTx, you think they went online to find out the number?


It's what I would have done.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Compananzi on June 26, 2005, 12:14:45 AM
Quote from: "DT"
Quote from: "Compananzi"
Quote from: "Charlotte"
As far as the shut down of information from the MB students, I don't think that anyone is telling them not to talk.  I think that it is their choice to do this.  They have got to be feeling guilty about what happened to her and therefore at this point are being very protective of her and not saying anything that would put her or her family in a bad light.


I think that interview with O'Reilly was very revealing, the male MB appears much more open and honest and not trying to paint some kinda of Stepford image of Nat.  We learned from his info and Bill's questions the following.
1. nat and Joran met days prior maybe up to 3 days before the dissapearance.
2. The played poker together.
3. He did not see anthing wrong with Nat and Joran hanging out at CnC


No one is painting a stepford image of Natalee.  They are saying she was a good girl who was responsible, smart and level-headed.  No one has said that she was perfect.  And none of the points you listed would even contradict a stepford (unrealistic) image of her.  Is it so hard for people to believe that she was a good person?


Hmm..

Let me see now .. a proffesor once say to use check marks..

1. They both had good friends.
2. They both had a good social circle.
3  Both had scholarship and college future.
4. Both are honor students.
5. Both appear to like to gamble, (your in the casino your gambling).
6. Both appear to like the night life ( you in CnC your drinkin and dancin).
7. They both appear to like each other..

I guess if you have to be on one side you have to demonize the other... I am just revisiting back and forth again.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: writenow on June 26, 2005, 12:15:02 AM
Quote from: "OldFart"
My point was if LE has not indcated where the drop off on the  was by searchng a particular area they may think the Beach story is another Lie
Where is  the beach from the area oidentifed on the time line.(HOW was THIS IDENTIFIED)
6:30 am Call to or from Joran’s cellphone in area of Santa Lucia


Santa Lucia is inland, kinda center of the island I think. Right? Isn't that the road that Joran would take to go to school in the morning -- heading south from Noord?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: arubagirl on June 26, 2005, 12:15:38 AM
arlee, it makes me uneasy because the five friends went before the dad.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Selena on June 26, 2005, 12:15:54 AM
At first I thought the Twitty's found out it was Joran from the other students,..I'm confused....

Ok,..I see the 9:30PM time frame, but I also thought other students said they saw the Kaploes gambling during the week...


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: arubagirl on June 26, 2005, 12:16:23 AM
Santa Lucia is way off the main road, unless the bus had to pick up a student there as well.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: arubagirl on June 26, 2005, 12:17:30 AM
Good point, BobinTx


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Compananzi on June 26, 2005, 12:17:38 AM
Quote from: "natfortplum"
could someone tell me how long the plane ride is from Holland to Aruba? Thanks in advance.


It must be at least 7 hours..


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: nancy_drew on June 26, 2005, 12:18:01 AM
Quote from: "Selena"
SB
There had to be a gigazillion people still on the island at that time,..and after the concert, can you imagine what it would be like to get into ANY nightspot? let alone to eat dinner...


It was a Sunday night, reported to be a "slower" night at the night spots. Especially with a big concert going on, eating dinner was probably not a problem.


Title: Re: contacting FBI
Post by: Arlee on June 26, 2005, 12:18:14 AM
Not meaning to sound sarcastic, but do you think the regular police shut down for bank holidays?  I wouldn't think the FBI would just leave on an answering maching.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: sad mom on June 26, 2005, 12:18:26 AM
I read somewhere that Natalee's roommates weren't too concerned about her not being in as she hadn't slept in her room for three previous nights, is that true???


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: arubagirl on June 26, 2005, 12:18:30 AM
Compananzi, it's more than that, 2 long hours more than that.

Now I remember why I prefer going to Miami.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: iquitos on June 26, 2005, 12:19:08 AM
Quote from: "writenow"
Quote from: "coco"
Compananzi - I'm not sure I follow your post but I do feel queazy about the speed of response from the Natalee's parents and the level of it. I could imagine Beth and Jug flying in to "wait for Natalee" and ask questions and push the police to investigate but there's something about Jug and 5 buddies (I think that's what he said the other night) and the FBI and the DEA all descending that fast - coupled with the complete shutdown of any negative info or even informational info from MB students that sits in the back of my mind nagging. Not even speculating here, just recording uneasiness on this score.


You know, they may have contacted the FBI in the states right away -- before they left for Aruba. The FBI could have given them tips on what to do. Plus, they could have put them in touch with other organizations who could immediately tell them what actions to take when a child is missing (Missing kids/Polly Klauss organization, etc.). These groups have it down to a tee from years of experience (unfortunately involving many kidnapped kids).


Curiously absent from this case is any mention of the role of the US Conulate General in Curacao with jurisdiction over Aruba.  When an American is in distress overseas they are the ones who are supposed to get involved.  They have been totally invisible except maybe the DEA  guy if he is attached to them  Anyone detected any Consular (Dept of State) presence on the island?  Any statements from the Consulate?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Kkial on June 26, 2005, 12:19:14 AM
Quote from: "Kipster"
arubagirl:
>>The FBI told Beth Twitty what to say? I'm not following you, kipster.

That's my guess. :) The only thing I've walked away with on the MB folk, is that they may have been contacted/interviewd. No details--anyone?. My opinion is that when Beth was ragging the local authorities, the FBI stepped in and made her change that line with a tidbit of info and a lecture on Dutch Law. Since then every family spokesperson has exuded his and her confidence in the way ya'll are handling the case (smart move IMO). Reeks of FBI...


Way offf...The FBI did INDEED talk to all the kids!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: pybird on June 26, 2005, 12:20:32 AM
I'm back to Joren calling Deepak @ 2:30 to get a ride home.  Joren then text msgs. Deepak @ 3:15 saying he doesn't need to pick him up, he's found another ride.  

Who from:
  A.  Papa VDS
  B.  Steve Croes (sorry, I'm still trying to get
      Croes to fit into this mess.)

Does it take 45 mins. to get anywhere on this island?  There would be little to no traffic at this hour.

Is the text msg. a cover as absolut indicated was a possiblility?  If so, did Deepak take Satish home?  Did Satish close Deepak's door so Mama Kalpoe would think both her boys were home safe & sound in bed?  Why in the middle of all that was going on would Deepak bother to take Satish home?  

Or, were both Satish & Deepak at home?  To me, this gives Satish & Deepak an alibi that they were not there with Joren & Natalee on the beach.

Oh hell, I hope this makes sense...I'm confusing myself.  LOL


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: puggywug on June 26, 2005, 12:20:44 AM
Quote from: "Scott"
Does anyone know if the Aruban authorities or the FBI has the full archive of Joran's websites before they were altered or taken down?

If, in fact, Joran drugged and raped Natalee, it is quite plausible that she was not the first victim; just the first to die.

If the names of the American girls whose photos appear on his sites can be identified, they should each be contacted and asked the nature of their relations and contact with him.  

I would be most curious to know which of these girls recall spending their last night in Aruba with Joran.

I believe his MO would be to prey upon already intoxicated girls who would have a murky recollection and questionable credibility.

Even if Natalee's death was drug-induced but unintentional, Joran may well have tried to cover it up because it's unlikely to be perceived as consensual if Natalee was a virgin prior to that night.

Sounds like a plan to me...(Edited to add) to investigate other potential victims.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Ladyhawke112 on June 26, 2005, 12:20:47 AM
Quote from: "writenow"
Quote from: "Ladyhawke112"
I'm warp-speed-reading trying to catch up. Regading an exchange between Iquitos and ExTexinAz near the end of the last thread - Is the new judge in Curacao?  If so, isn't fast and easy to take a boat to Aruba?

Also, whan I stopped reading this morning, you all were discussing the effects of date rape drugs. If you need any more first hand info, I have an unusual experience with that and would be happy to share.


Please share.

I did meet a girl (one of the first to file a lawsuit about it) who was given a roofie. She said she couldn't move.


writenow, thanks for asking. If you are unfortunate enough to be slipped one of these creepy drugs, I was very lucky. I was with my husband and daughter at a yearly crab-feed fund-raiser.  We had attended may years already; DD and her classmates performed. It's basically a family situation; everybody knows everybody. You buy your drinks - served in plastic cups and you don't think twice about leaving them at your table to socialize. What I remember is having a glass and a half of wine with a very full meal (I had thirds on crab - we knew the cook), watching the performance start about 8pm and waking up in my bad about 7am - with no knowledge of how I got there - or why I wasn't in my normal nightgown.

The good news is that we later determined that the "attack" was probably aimed at my daughter, and I am glad to have taken that hit. My husband says that I responded almost coherently to conversation, but I have no memory of doing so. At the end of the performance - he walked me to the car - again an act I do not remember.  He told me later that at one point I said, "I am so glad I'm with you." Again, no memory.

This happened about 4 years ago and even though I was protected from anything really bad happening, I cannot describe how creepy it is to awaken with part of your memory unavailable. I feel that to this day.  I cannot imagine the horror to have awakened feeling physical evidence of having been violated.

Bottom line - no matter where you are or what you are drinking - watch it being prepared and do not set it down.

Anyway  - based on what my husband told me, I was able to walk whilst drugged - so if this happened to Natalee, she might not have needed to be carried.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: heartache on June 26, 2005, 12:21:09 AM
Arubagirl... when the parents were still in the States, they punched in 411. Why is everyone on the BB obsessed with details that have nothing to do with anything. Howcome the FBI was involved so quickly. What meds was NH on. When did NH meet Baby? Why was Mama in Holland? What color toilet paper does the VDS's use?  How many drinks did the entire MBHS studentbody consume in a year. What is the rate of Teen pregnancy in MB? What was NH's GPA?  What was NH's waistsize on this trip, compared to the same time last year? Maybe Geraldo is having an affair with Beth and that is why Fox is all over this story. :roll:


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Charlotte on June 26, 2005, 12:21:28 AM
What if, when the brothers picked up Joran & natalee from C & C, they took the two of them to Joran's house/apartment?  If his intention was to have sex with her, wouldn't that make more sense than the beach or the car?  Then whatever happened to her happened at his apartment.  Then he gets the Dad involved in the coverup.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: wantsanswers on June 26, 2005, 12:21:30 AM
Quote from: "arubagirl"
So BobinTx, you think they went online to find out the number?


they are good friends with a senator, according to the papers he got the FBO involved


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: CancunMole on June 26, 2005, 12:21:39 AM
Oh, why aren't ArubaGirl , NativeLingo or any of the other 'on Island folks' on or staying on the board t help us know what is going on and to translate for us? Oh, maybe because we are insulting idiots or by definition, UGLY AMERICANS????????


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: nancy_drew on June 26, 2005, 12:22:20 AM
Quote from: "sad mom"
I read somewhere that Natalee's roommates weren't too concerned about her not being in as she hadn't slept in her room for three previous nights, is that true???


Check your PM, I'm sending you one more.


Title: ams-aua time
Post by: iquitos on June 26, 2005, 12:22:41 AM
flight time ams-aua is probably 9 hours.  it is 11 from london via amsterdam.  will keep looking


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: arubagirl on June 26, 2005, 12:22:47 AM
heartache, someone was theorizing that they called the FBI from Aruba. That's why I was wondering how they got the number. Jeez.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: golden on June 26, 2005, 12:22:49 AM
Quote from: "LilOrphan"
Quote from: "arubagirl"
if Paul van der Sloot heard something (i.e. NH talking) or saw something, he has to tell.

If Joran told him something (dad, this is what happened to her), then he doesn't have to tell.


Arubagirl, have you heard any rumor that Joran is literally biting his tongue to make himself unable to speak? A source elsewhere (who has been almost as reliable as you) stated it a few times. He did not confirm or deny when someone translated it as being in the literal sense, and did refer to it as the boy's poor bloody tongue.


I have read his posts too.  I don't think he means literally.  Just that JVDS wont talk.


Title: Re: contacting FBI
Post by: absolut on June 26, 2005, 12:22:53 AM
Quote from: "arlee"
Quote from: "absolut"
Quote from: "dl3fan"
I don't believe they would have called the FBI for advice before leaving because best I can remember it was Memorail Day that day.  And you that is a holiday.


Good catch I didn't even think about that. That should have made all these cycles longer.


Not meaning to sound sarcastic, but do you think the regular police shut down for bank holidays?  I wouldn't think the FBI would just leave on an answering maching.


I was referring to all of the cycles, flight plan approval, contact to officials who give more than lip service and head from Atlanta or Alabama to Aruba. All of that seems to have started while the chartered plane was in the air. There are many other cycles that started faster in this case than almost any other.


Title: Re: contacting FBI
Post by: RB on June 26, 2005, 12:22:57 AM
Quote from: "arlee"
Not meaning to sound sarcastic, but do you think the regular police shut down for bank holidays?  I wouldn't think the FBI would just leave on an answering maching.


The FBI has a command center in DC - they man it 24x7 as part of the DHS (Department of Homeland Security) work.  All calls over holiday and non business hours go there.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Kipster on June 26, 2005, 12:23:01 AM
>>Way offf...The FBI did INDEED talk to all the kids!

Though I agree: Link? Quote? Proof? All I have seen or read says they have interviewed 'most'.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: katya on June 26, 2005, 12:23:04 AM
Quote from: "heartache"
My daughter doesn't show up for a plane ride... I call the FBI. You punch in 411 on your phone. Maybe the chaperones called them. WHO FRIGGIN cares who called them.


And for most people they won't do anything. If you think the FBI jumps on the case of every missing American (less than 24 hours in the case), you are seriously deluded. I have some personal experience with this.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: klaasend on June 26, 2005, 12:23:12 AM
Quote from: "arubagirl"
arlee, it makes me uneasy because the five friends went before the dad.

The dad was coming from a different state.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: doman4 on June 26, 2005, 12:23:34 AM
Quote from: "DT"
Quote from: "arubagirl"
I'm sorry, but who walks around with the FBI phone number handy?


Im pretty sure it would be in the phone book. Plus if they had connections ( a senator for instance) he would have no problem getting the FBI involved.


In People Mag. it said she asked the cop who picked her up for speeding for the fbi #


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: heartache on June 26, 2005, 12:23:49 AM
Cancunmole... just as an aside... do you happen to know the lineage of one of the co-authors of "The Ugly American"???


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: iquitos on June 26, 2005, 12:23:54 AM
aua girl has been here today.  

Quote from: "CancunMole"
Oh, why aren't ArubaGirl , NativeLingo or any of the other 'on Island folks' on or staying on the board t help us know what is going on and to translate for us? Oh, maybe because we are insulting idiots or by definition, UGLY AMERICANS????????


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: arubagirl on June 26, 2005, 12:24:01 AM
CancunMole, what in the hell?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: lee on June 26, 2005, 12:24:33 AM
"He did not want her to go on this trip and probably feels her let her down by not being there to help her. It is a lot to have to go "

Is that true?...her dad didn't want her to go?



I knew I liked him from the start.....a real dad, with real concerns for his dtr...


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Compananzi on June 26, 2005, 12:24:44 AM
Quote from: "arlee"
Quote from: "coco"
Compananzi - I'm not sure I follow your post but I do feel queazy about the speed of response from the Natalee's parents and the level of it. I could imagine Beth and Jug flying in to "wait for Natalee" and ask questions and push the police to investigate but there's something about Jug and 5 buddies (I think that's what he said the other night) and the FBI and the DEA all descending that fast - coupled with the complete shutdown of any negative info or even informational info from MB students that sits in the back of my mind nagging. Not even speculating here, just recording uneasiness on this score.


I'm not following you.  It was my understanding that DEA already on assignment (in Aruba? a neighboring island?) were contacted due to their proximity.  I don't know how/when FBI got involved, although reports have said Beth asked police how to contact the FBI before she flew over.  What makes you uneasy about 5 friends going over to Aruba, too?

As for the MB students...  That's kind of a funny story, I think.  It involves the far-reaching effects of irresponsible media.  One of the first stories in our local paper ended with the line, "MB students will not discuss Natalee or the trip."  I was shocked!  I happened to be talking to an MB student right after that, & I asked him, "What, we aren't supposed to talk? Who said?  I didn't hear about it!  Why didn't they use the email tree (of the students/parents involved on the trip)?"  And he said, "That's funny, the reporter wrote that because of me.  I went to the prayer vigil (the first one) but got the times wrong, so no one was there practically but me and this reporter.  She asked me all kinds of questions & I kept saying, 'I can't answer.  I'm a sophomore.  I wasn't on the senior trip.  I don't know Natalee, I'm just upset and concerned for her, so that's why I showed up here.'  Then she goes back and writes, "'MB students refuse to talk.'"  Because she didn't get the answers her editor must have asked her for, she covered her rear with this unusual spin.

Ok, so like me, all the folks in MB read that & blanched because they didn't know why they weren't in the loop.  Again, we all thought, we're not supposed to talk?  Why not?  Who said?  Well, we better not!  And so most kids from then on buttoned up, & a story that started out as false became true.  Amazing!

On several occasions I've talked to Marcia Twitty & the friend helping her handle media requests.  They both emphasized that neither of them had or would tell *anyone* not to talk.  

However, the students who have been interviewed are shutting down & advising others not to step up because each & every one has gotten completely screwed over.  In some cases, they were outright lied to by producers; in others, their words were twisted & quotes used to endorse information that they'd actually *refuted* in interviews.  In all cases, they've been vilified in this and other message boards.  They've been criticized in the same forums both for talking and for *not* talking.  

Heck of a situation for kids to find themselves in.


Well that is understandable, there was a question also posed why no friends of Joran has some to his defense. ... Well one or 2 did, but because of this massive exposure, there is on this side also a shutdown.  Partly because no friends wanna get arrested... Jug Twitty today mentioned his desire to see AVDS arrested or interviewed... I think Nadira Ramires, mother of the Kalpoes is next.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Arlee on June 26, 2005, 12:24:53 AM
Quote from: "arubagirl"
arlee, it makes me uneasy because the five friends went before the dad.


I still don't understand...?  Not being confrontational -- this is not even something I knew about.  So I'm not defending the situation, I just don't know what happened or why it is troubling...?

(I'll be away for a few minutes.)


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: DT on June 26, 2005, 12:25:02 AM
Quote from: "Compananzi"
Quote from: "DT"
Quote from: "Compananzi"
Quote from: "Charlotte"
As far as the shut down of information from the MB students, I don't think that anyone is telling them not to talk.  I think that it is their choice to do this.  They have got to be feeling guilty about what happened to her and therefore at this point are being very protective of her and not saying anything that would put her or her family in a bad light.


I think that interview with O'Reilly was very revealing, the male MB appears much more open and honest and not trying to paint some kinda of Stepford image of Nat.  We learned from his info and Bill's questions the following.
1. nat and Joran met days prior maybe up to 3 days before the dissapearance.
2. The played poker together.
3. He did not see anthing wrong with Nat and Joran hanging out at CnC


No one is painting a stepford image of Natalee.  They are saying she was a good girl who was responsible, smart and level-headed.  No one has said that she was perfect.  And none of the points you listed would even contradict a stepford (unrealistic) image of her.  Is it so hard for people to believe that she was a good person?


Hmm..

Let me see now .. a proffesor once say to use check marks..

1. They both had good friends.
2. They both had a good social circle.
3  Both had scholarship and college future.
4. Both are honor students.
5. Both appear to like to gamble, (your in the casino your gambling).
6. Both appear to like the night life ( you in CnC your drinkin and dancin).
7. They both appear to like each other..

I guess if you have to be on one side you have to demonize the other... I am just revisiting back and forth again.


To my knowledge having friends, good grades and a scholarship doesn't make someone a good person. Im not sure we know Natalee likes to gamble.

I don't really know what that has to do with what I posted.  All I did was claim that your original assertion that Natalees friend were trying to portray a "stepford" image of her was off base.  I've never heard her friends try to do anything like that.  And nothing we know makes her seem anything less than what her friends have said about her.  

Also, I'm not demonizing Joran. I really don't know anything about him.  All I know is that he has lied repeatedly to police and to NH's family regarding her disappearence.  I know that he is falsely implicated to innocent men.  He may have been a great person up until now, but so far as this story is going he is looking to be a fairly bad person.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: doman4 on June 26, 2005, 12:25:09 AM
Quote from: "katya"
Quote from: "heartache"
My daughter doesn't show up for a plane ride... I call the FBI. You punch in 411 on your phone. Maybe the chaperones called them. WHO FRIGGIN cares who called them.


And for most people they won't do anything. If you think the FBI jumps on the case of every missing American (less than 24 hours in the case), you are seriously deluded. I have some personal experience with this.


My grandma was kidnapped and held for ransome 2 years ago.  The fbi was here to help us less than 48 hours after she was taken.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Selena on June 26, 2005, 12:25:15 AM
LOL @Geraldo and ANYONE having an affair!!!
( I heard that Marianne Croes was kind of hot...)
Scott,..a girl did allegedly have a story reported by the Post Herlad which I believe is the Birmingham paper, she was from Boston and met Joran and found him "aggressive" but I was never able to locate the story. I had the URL and it didn't come up.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: columbo on June 26, 2005, 12:25:15 AM
Quote from: "heartache"
Arubagirl... when the parents were still in the States, they punched in 411. Why is everyone on the BB obsessed with details that have nothing to do with anything. Howcome the FBI was involved so quickly. What meds was NH on. When did NH meet Baby? Why was Mama in Holland? What color toilet paper does the VDS's use?  How many drinks did the entire MBHS studentbody consume in a year. What is the rate of Teen pregnancy in MB? What was NH's GPA?  What was NH's waistsize on this trip, compared to the same time last year? Maybe Geraldo is having an affair with Beth and that is why Fox is all over this story. :roll:



Just following every lead.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: LilOrphan on June 26, 2005, 12:25:30 AM
Quote from: "golden"
Quote from: "LilOrphan"
Quote


I have read his posts too.  I don't think he means literally.  Just that JVDS wont talk.


Thought that at first, too, but then the other guy translated it to be figurative and the source continued on with the bloody tongue stuff. Will have to go back and read it over again. Thanks! Not sure why I care, just that it would suggest to me J is the one who tried to commit suicide over this.


Title: fbi# from a cop
Post by: dl3fan on June 26, 2005, 12:27:54 AM
Quote from: "doman4"
Quote from: "DT"
Quote from: "arubagirl"
I'm sorry, but who walks around with the FBI phone number handy?


Im pretty sure it would be in the phone book. Plus if they had connections ( a senator for instance) he would have no problem getting the FBI involved.


In People Mag. it said she asked the cop who picked her up for speeding for the fbi #


Not saying it didn't happen but I would be shocked if the cops here had the FBI# handy with them.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: writenow on June 26, 2005, 12:28:02 AM
Quote from: "Selena"
The Brian Reynolds on the trip who was at CnC's. Could that have been one of her cousins? She had twin cousins on the trip. He ws the one who saw the shoving match,..and I'm sorry, these questions are on my mind. If so, why wasn't that known?


No, Hunter Twitty and I think the other one was named Thomas. Is that right?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: GuyWdog on June 26, 2005, 12:28:35 AM
Quote
"ORANJESTAD, Aruba (18 June 2005) -- Natalee Holloway's family, not Aruban police, first identified and located a Dutch youth now held as a suspect in the disappearance of the Alabama teen, according to a friend who helped with the search.

The family's quick work — a combination of hunches, tips and amateur detective work on the Caribbean island — also led to two of the youth's friends who also were taken into custody. But it ultimately was met by frustration when authorities failed to quickly arrest the trio, which included the son of a prominent Dutch ministry official.

"She had been missing less than 24 hours and we had all three names and addresses, so it's just disappointing that they weren't able to move faster," said Jody Bearman, who organized the trip to Aruba for 125 students from Mountain Brook High School and seven chaperones.
You can find this URL here

http://www.cdnn.info/news/travel/t050618.html

This should shed some light on WHO found out who Natalee was last seen with. To me this is a sticking point, as BHT has said many times that they have NOT talked to any MBHS sutdents on the trip. So many inconsistancies and so many unanswered questions....

GuyWdog


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: arubagirl on June 26, 2005, 12:28:36 AM
Mariaine and Geraldo... hee hee hee.

Thanks to the poster who said that Beth asked the cop to get the FBI for her.

Arlee, maybe 'uneasy' is the wrong word. I just find it strange that when your (step) daughter goes missing you don't take the dad along, but you do take five friends along. Dad is in another state, but still. Did other relatives also travel with the plane?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: coco on June 26, 2005, 12:28:57 AM
arlee Thank you for your really helpful answer about the MB kids - and for your tone in all these discussions. I know this is all close to home for you and I've wanted to say that I think you've been great.

And having worked press relations in some sticky situations, I really feel for the kids who have dealt with the media - it's mighty rough out there and they've done an admirable job.


DT nodding - I would have been on the first plane down too - but I may have been less certain about precisely what happened right at the beginning. I'm not sure if that's a bad point for me as a mom or a realistic reaction.  

and Jug makes me crazy - just a personal aversion to a certain style of man ... I'd take a David Holloway any day of the week!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: wantsanswers on June 26, 2005, 12:29:04 AM
Quote from: "arubagirl"
arlee, it makes me uneasy because the five friends went before the dad.


the dad was in another state and booked a flight, someone called them according to his wife on TV, and said they found her. It was a mistake, the chaperone called from Natalees cell phone to her mother and someone thought it was her. The flight was cancelled, then they were told she did not call and then they rescheduled the flight the next morning. Again you have to get info in the first 48 hours. We  have lots of TV shows called 48 hours that is what the cops say is crucial for investiagations. The police told them to wait, she would show uo next happy hour. I am sure they wanted to kill somebody after that!!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: CancunMole on June 26, 2005, 12:29:40 AM
Quote from: "sb"
Jug and Beth Twitty are the kind of people who're determined to find their daughter and they really don't care too much what anyone thinks of why or how they go about it! They are VICTIMS and they don't need all the finger-pointing at them right now. They are more worried about RESULTS than IMAGE.


Then why wasn't NH's Dad, Dave Holloway called right off? Why were he and his wife dealyed until Wednesday, June 1?


Title: FBI Connection
Post by: Itawamba on June 26, 2005, 12:29:44 AM
When I had a stalker who was monitoring my phone calls on my cordless phone (not cell) and who had threatened me about the Internet (long story), I called my local cops, my 911 emergency number.

The detective who listened to my story said it was FBI jurisdiction and just patched me through to an agent.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Selena on June 26, 2005, 12:30:36 AM
ty writenow,..I was thinking Reynolds as in Paul(uncle)
It must be hard to think of first name that sounds good with Twitty


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: wantsanswers on June 26, 2005, 12:30:54 AM
Quote from: "Compananzi"
Quote from: "arlee"
Quote from: "coco"
Compananzi - I'm not sure I follow your post but I do feel queazy about the speed of response from the Natalee's parents and the level of it. I could imagine Beth and Jug flying in to "wait for Natalee" and ask questions and push the police to investigate but there's something about Jug and 5 buddies (I think that's what he said the other night) and the FBI and the DEA all descending that fast - coupled with the complete shutdown of any negative info or even informational info from MB students that sits in the back of my mind nagging. Not even speculating here, just recording uneasiness on this score.


I'm not following you.  It was my understanding that DEA already on assignment (in Aruba? a neighboring island?) were contacted due to their proximity.  I don't know how/when FBI got involved, although reports have said Beth asked police how to contact the FBI before she flew over.  What makes you uneasy about 5 friends going over to Aruba, too?

As for the MB students...  That's kind of a funny story, I think.  It involves the far-reaching effects of irresponsible media.  One of the first stories in our local paper ended with the line, "MB students will not discuss Natalee or the trip."  I was shocked!  I happened to be talking to an MB student right after that, & I asked him, "What, we aren't supposed to talk? Who said?  I didn't hear about it!  Why didn't they use the email tree (of the students/parents involved on the trip)?"  And he said, "That's funny, the reporter wrote that because of me.  I went to the prayer vigil (the first one) but got the times wrong, so no one was there practically but me and this reporter.  She asked me all kinds of questions & I kept saying, 'I can't answer.  I'm a sophomore.  I wasn't on the senior trip.  I don't know Natalee, I'm just upset and concerned for her, so that's why I showed up here.'  Then she goes back and writes, "'MB students refuse to talk.'"  Because she didn't get the answers her editor must have asked her for, she covered her rear with this unusual spin.

Ok, so like me, all the folks in MB read that & blanched because they didn't know why they weren't in the loop.  Again, we all thought, we're not supposed to talk?  Why not?  Who said?  Well, we better not!  And so most kids from then on buttoned up, & a story that started out as false became true.  Amazing!

On several occasions I've talked to Marcia Twitty & the friend helping her handle media requests.  They both emphasized that neither of them had or would tell *anyone* not to talk.  

However, the students who have been interviewed are shutting down & advising others not to step up because each & every one has gotten completely screwed over.  In some cases, they were outright lied to by producers; in others, their words were twisted & quotes used to endorse information that they'd actually *refuted* in interviews.  In all cases, they've been vilified in this and other message boards.  They've been criticized in the same forums both for talking and for *not* talking.  

Heck of a situation for kids to find themselves in.


Well that is understandable, there was a question also posed why no friends of Joran has some to his defense. ... Well one or 2 did, but because of this massive exposure, there is on this side also a shutdown.  Partly because no friends wanna get arrested... Jug Twitty today mentioned his desire to see AVDS arrested or interviewed... I think Nadira Ramires, mother of the Kalpoes is next.


Such a hoot!!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: DT on June 26, 2005, 12:31:41 AM
Quote from: "coco"


DT nodding - I would have been on the first plane down too - but I may have been less certain about precisely what happened right at the beginning. I'm not sure if that's a bad point for me as a mom or a realistic reaction.  

and Jug makes me crazy - just a personal aversion to a certain style of man ... I'd take a David Holloway any day of the week!


Im not sure how long it took them to be sure Joran had something to do with it.  Maybe they were just being presumptuous, who knows?

Agreed about Jug.  But I wouldn't pass judgement on him given his situation.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Kipster on June 26, 2005, 12:31:55 AM
>>Oh, why aren't ArubaGirl , NativeLingo or any of the other 'on Island folks' on or staying on the board t help us know what is going on and to translate for us? Oh, maybe because we are insulting idiots or by definition, UGLY AMERICANS????????

Aww, their hides are leathered from dealing vis-a-vis with our dumbasses daily. Lil message board adrenaline shouldn't scare them off. ;) However, what happened to --- & other AL folk?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: katya on June 26, 2005, 12:32:01 AM
Quote from: "doman4"
Quote from: "katya"
Quote from: "heartache"
My daughter doesn't show up for a plane ride... I call the FBI. You punch in 411 on your phone. Maybe the chaperones called them. WHO FRIGGIN cares who called them.


And for most people they won't do anything. If you think the FBI jumps on the case of every missing American (less than 24 hours in the case), you are seriously deluded. I have some personal experience with this.


My grandma was kidnapped and held for ransome 2 years ago.  The fbi was here to help us less than 48 hours after she was taken.


Being kidnapped and held for ransom is quite different from a missing person.


Title: Re: FBI Connection
Post by: nancy_drew on June 26, 2005, 12:32:17 AM
Quote from: "Itawamba"
When I had a stalker who was monitoring my phone calls on my cordless phone (not cell) and who had threatened me about the Internet (long story), I called my local cops, my 911 emergency number.

The detective who listened to my story said it was FBI jurisdiction and just patched me through to an agent.


The FBI handles all Internet issues as it's across state lines, etc.  If I recall they even have a spot on their site where Internet/email issues can be sent to them.


Title: insurance fraud
Post by: dl3fan on June 26, 2005, 12:32:57 AM
Not that any of us ever believed it but found out today that Mr. Holloway is an insurance agent for a major insurance co(think Farm) so that would make it more unlikely that he would take out an insurance policy on his daughter for the purpose of defrauding.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Charlotte on June 26, 2005, 12:33:09 AM
Quote from: "writenow"
Quote from: "Selena"
The Brian Reynolds on the trip who was at CnC's. Could that have been one of her cousins? She had twin cousins on the trip. He ws the one who saw the shoving match,..and I'm sorry, these questions are on my mind. If so, why wasn't that known?


No, Hunter Twitty and I think the other one was named Thomas. Is that right?


That's right


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: CancunMole on June 26, 2005, 12:33:34 AM
Quote from: "arubagirl"
Per this link: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,160231,00.html

VAN SUSTEREN: Have you spoken to any of her friends that saw her on May 30 because she left Carlos and Charlie's?

TWITTY: Not in person. I really have not.

---

Am I supposed to think that she didn't speak to them at all or that she spoke to them via phone?
[/url]


Maybe, after having spent every night at C&C, despite having to pay for drinks, no one could speak?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: natfortplum on June 26, 2005, 12:33:56 AM
Quote from: "wantsanswers"
Quote from: "arubagirl"
arlee, it makes me uneasy because the five friends went before the dad.


the dad was in another state and booked a flight, someone called them according to his wife on TV, and said they found her. It was a mistake, the chaperone called from Natalees cell phone to her mother and someone thought it was her. The flight was cancelled, then they were told she did not call and then they rescheduled the flight the next morning. Again you have to get info in the first 48 hours. We  have lots of TV shows called 48 hours that is what the cops say is crucial for investiagations. The police told them to wait, she would show uo next happy hour. I am sure they wanted to kill somebody after that!!


I believe it was the son who called Dad.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: columbo on June 26, 2005, 12:34:45 AM
Just wondering....

Is it possible that Joran never went home at 11pm? Is it possible that he and Nat hung out from the time they met at the casino and then, went to CC together. If Joran was gambling until 10:30 (after the tourny) and Nat was at a concert untill 9:30, could it be possible that they made plans to meet up and Joran never went home?

Supposedly, Joran shows up at CC at 12- 12:30...he leaves with Nat before 1am. Is this enough time for her to trust him? Is this enough time for her to feel safe with him? Why would she be dancing/partying with someone if she briefly met him at casino and then, spent less than an hour with him at CC?? She obviously felt close enough to him to accept a ride. Perhaps they did hang out at the concert, casino and went to CC's together? Am I way off here?


Title: Timing of first day
Post by: Itawamba on June 26, 2005, 12:35:17 AM
I know that Dave and Robin Holloway have two younger children, so there had to be a lot of contingencies taken care of in order to leave, at least, I would imagine so.

What I'm not quite understanding is if Tom and Hunter Twitty, Natalee's cousins, were on the same trip, why didn't one of them stay behind with the chaperone?  And since they did leave and go back to Birmingham, has either one of them been back to Aruba for the searches--they are the ones who saw Joran and played cards with him or were around him in the casino.  They would be a big help.  What's the story on them?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Kkial on June 26, 2005, 12:35:43 AM
Quote from: "Kipster"
>>Way offf...The FBI did INDEED talk to all the kids!

Though I agree: Link? Quote? Proof? All I have seen or read says they have interviewed 'most'.


According to local news,,,they wanted to talk to the kids and they would not let them until they had been debriefed by the FBI.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: KKM on June 26, 2005, 12:35:53 AM
I am not in any way criticizing those who have questioned why the students from Mountain Brook High School have not been more vocal, why the public hasn't heard more from them, etc., etc.  I am not out to cause discord, I am just curious.

My question to you (those who want to hear from them) is this.  After everything you have heard to date from all sources, what exactly do you want to hear from them?  What could they tell you that would solve this case?  Why is it so important for these kids to be in the public eye?

You have already been told that nobody (especially those who were out by the pool) saw her returned to the Holiday Inn.  I think you know how highly thought of she is, along w/ her parents.  This place isn't nearly as "Stepford" as it's made out to be, it's just a small town, with small town, old fashioned values.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: absolut on June 26, 2005, 12:36:11 AM
Quote from: "columbo"
Just wondering....

Is it possible that Joran never went home at 11pm? Is it possible that he and Nat hung out from the time they met at the casino and then, went to CC together. If Joran was gambling until 10:30 (after the tourny) and Nat was at a concert untill 9:30, could it be possible that they made plans to meet up and Joran never went home?

Supposedly, Joran shows up at CC at 12- 12:30...he leaves with Nat before 1am. Is this enough time for her to trust him? Is this enough time for her to feel safe with him? Why would she be dancing/partying with someone if she briefly met him at casino and then, spent less than an hour with him at CC?? She obviously felt close enough to him to accept a ride. Perhaps they did hang out at the concert, casino and went to CC's together? Am I way off here?


Issues I have had for a week.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Vole on June 26, 2005, 12:36:13 AM
Quote from: "SunnyinTX"
Quote from: "arubagirl"
If Jug said that, and AvdS is going to be detained, then I guess we know who's running the show.

AvdS wasn't on the island, so she couldn't see/hear anything. And anything that JvdS told her she doesn't have to reveal, so basically, there is no point.


I ws shocked when he said that....that poor woman has been through enough.....I know many will not agree with me....but it's my opinion.  Certainly it doesn't compare to what Beth and family have been and are still going through....but as Arubagirl says...anything she might know (and I doubt she knows a thing) would be protected. As far as her being the easiest to break...I think not....remember she would be the lioness is protecting her cub...


I agree with you I was thinking next he will want his siblings interrogated.
While I understand they are in pain because of Natalee, Anita Van Der Sloot is also in pain. Why does he want inflict more pain on her...... She loves her son just as Beth loves her daughter.
Hope they do not bring her in for questioning........It is starting to look a little bit strange already everytime Jug says he wants someone arrested
whadda ya know next day, their in jail.
JM thoughts


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Scott on June 26, 2005, 12:36:19 AM
Quote from: "pybird"

Or, were both Satish & Deepak at home?  To me, this gives Satish & Deepak an alibi that they were not there with Joren & Natalee on the beach.


It's no alibi if Deepak and/or Satish procured a drug for Joran to put in Natalee's drink.

It's also doesn't clear their names if they drove/dropped off Joran and Natalee at the van der Sloot home or a secluded location with the intent of allowing Joran to have his way with a drugged/passed out girl.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Another K in Texas on June 26, 2005, 12:36:38 AM
Quote from: "arlee"
Quote from: "arubagirl"
arlee, it makes me uneasy because the five friends went before the dad.


I still don't understand...?  Not being confrontational -- this is not even something I knew about.  So I'm not defending the situation, I just don't know what happened or why it is troubling...?

(I'll be away for a few minutes.)


I heard the stepmom talk about this.


Said they got call from 16 year old? brother of nat--remember the Beth was not at home, that Nat missed her plane.  They waited all thinking she had just overslept and whould show up to go with second group.

When they found out she missed second flight they got reservations to fly there that day.

Then they got word that Nat's reservations had been moved to a later flight.  They thought that meant she had showed up.  They later found out that the chaperone had changed the reservations thinking she would show up.  They cancelled their flight though.

In the mix was also the fact that Nat's cell phone was being used, and then they found out that was the chaperone calling parents.

By the time they were sure she had not been the one to change the reservations, they got the next flight out--but it was not till early the next morning.

I heard this interview on television and could have a couple of things mixed up, but this was why she was explaining they did not leave till the next morning.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: TTownMike on June 26, 2005, 12:36:43 AM
Hey, all y'all!
Is  it safe to come in here?  I been tryin ta catchup, sotaspeak!  As pre the following:

Quote from: "friend of monkeys"
Quote from: "boxopen"
Quote from: "friend of monkeys"
u must know TTown Mike...
LOL... I already "knew (http://scaredmonkeys.com/Discussion/viewtopic.php?p=16708#16708)" him. :x


So i am behind?



WHUTCHUTAWKINBOUT!?!?!?!?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: DT on June 26, 2005, 12:36:46 AM
Quote from: "columbo"
Just wondering....

Is it possible that Joran never went home at 11pm? Is it possible that he and Nat hung out from the time they met at the casino and then, went to CC together. If Joran was gambling until 10:30 (after the tourny) and Nat was at a concert untill 9:30, could it be possible that they made plans to meet up and Joran never went home?

Supposedly, Joran shows up at CC at 12- 12:30...he leaves with Nat before 1am. Is this enough time for her to trust him? Is this enough time for her to feel safe with him? Why would she be dancing/partying with someone if she briefly met him at casino and then, spent less than an hour with him at CC?? She obviously felt close enough to him to accept a ride. Perhaps they did hang out at the concert, casino and went to CC's together? Am I way off here?


I think they had hung out before, and joran was familiar with the MB people being in the casino so much, which would explain her trust.  I think that some of her friends actuall went with natalee though, so I doubt she was hanging out with Joran all that time.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: RB on June 26, 2005, 12:36:52 AM
My daughter doesn't show up for a plane ride... I call the FBI. You punch in 411 on your phone. Maybe the chaperones called them. WHO FRIGGIN cares who called them.

My grandma was kidnapped and held for ransome 2 years ago.  The fbi was here to help us less than 48 hours after she was taken.


It actually does matter, if the speculation about insurance is true, then it is possible that this entire "how come the FBI/plane/flight plan etc" could be because if in fact there was a kidnapping/ransom situation relayed to them and the Twitty's had travel risk insurance (it's a benefit I have where I were work, for example, and Natalee would be covered since she's 18, registered for college and can be claimed as a dependent until she's out of school, I think) there's a predefined plan between the risk insurer, the policy holder (the employer) and the feds that gets followed to expedite getting the family there and FBI involved in the cases of a out CONUS traveller's disappearance.

I am not advocating that Natalee was or wasn't kidnapped: what I am saying is that if there was an indication (either a ransom phone call, Aruba police, etc) that she was, this would be handled expeditiously in the manner that's been described.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: writenow on June 26, 2005, 12:37:33 AM
Quote from: "Ladyhawke112"
Quote from: "writenow"
Quote from: "Ladyhawke112"
I'm warp-speed-reading trying to catch up. Regading an exchange between Iquitos and ExTexinAz near the end of the last thread - Is the new judge in Curacao?  If so, isn't fast and easy to take a boat to Aruba?

Also, whan I stopped reading this morning, you all were discussing the effects of date rape drugs. If you need any more first hand info, I have an unusual experience with that and would be happy to share.


Please share.

I did meet a girl (one of the first to file a lawsuit about it) who was given a roofie. She said she couldn't move.


writenow, thanks for asking. If you are unfortunate enough to be slipped one of these creepy drugs, I was very lucky. I was with my husband and daughter at a yearly crab-feed fund-raiser.  We had attended may years already; DD and her classmates performed. It's basically a family situation; everybody knows everybody. You buy your drinks - served in plastic cups and you don't think twice about leaving them at your table to socialize. What I remember is having a glass and a half of wine with a very full meal (I had thirds on crab - we knew the cook), watching the performance start about 8pm and waking up in my bad about 7am - with no knowledge of how I got there - or why I wasn't in my normal nightgown.

The good news is that we later determined that the "attack" was probably aimed at my daughter, and I am glad to have taken that hit. My husband says that I responded almost coherently to conversation, but I have no memory of doing so. At the end of the performance - he walked me to the car - again an act I do not remember.  He told me later that at one point I said, "I am so glad I'm with you." Again, no memory.

This happened about 4 years ago and even though I was protected from anything really bad happening, I cannot describe how creepy it is to awaken with part of your memory unavailable. I feel that to this day.  I cannot imagine the horror to have awakened feeling physical evidence of having been violated.

Bottom line - no matter where you are or what you are drinking - watch it being prepared and do not set it down.

Anyway  - based on what my husband told me, I was able to walk whilst drugged - so if this happened to Natalee, she might not have needed to be carried.


Wow. You were lucky. Maybe the woman I talked to could move but had the mental perception that she had no control over her body. She said she did wake up in a place she didn't recognize and didn't know how she got there.


Title: Re: insurance fraud
Post by: Compananzi on June 26, 2005, 12:37:40 AM
Quote from: "dl3fan"
Not that any of us ever believed it but found out today that Mr. Holloway is an insurance agent for a major insurance co(think Farm) so that would make it more unlikely that he would take out an insurance policy on his daughter for the purpose of defrauding.


More Unlikely? I would think more likely she would be getting employee discount rates..


Title: Texas Hold'em
Post by: Itawamba on June 26, 2005, 12:37:46 AM
Are we absolutely certain the Texas Hold 'Em power tournament started at 8PM?  I thought it was much, much earlier in the day, like afternoon.


Title: Re: insurance fraud
Post by: nancy_drew on June 26, 2005, 12:37:55 AM
Quote from: "dl3fan"
Not that any of us ever believed it but found out today that Mr. Holloway is an insurance agent for a major insurance co(think Farm) so that would make it more unlikely that he would take out an insurance policy on his daughter for the purpose of defrauding.


I'm guessing if there is a big policy that covers kidnapping (which I've read and not confirmed) I think it's because State Farm employees may have great packages that cover them and their family.

Just a thought...


Title: Re: FBI Connection
Post by: friend of monkeys on June 26, 2005, 12:38:29 AM
Quote from: "Itawamba"
When I had a stalker who was monitoring my phone calls on my cordless phone (not cell) and who had threatened me about the Internet (long story), I called my local cops, my 911 emergency number.

The detective who listened to my story said it was FBI jurisdiction and just patched me through to an agent.


they r definitelt well informed.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: golden on June 26, 2005, 12:39:40 AM
Quote from: "Compananzi"


Well that is understandable, there was a question also posed why no friends of Joran has some to his defense. ... Well one or 2 did, but because of this massive exposure, there is on this side also a shutdown.  Partly because no friends wanna get arrested... Jug Twitty today mentioned his desire to see AVDS arrested or interviewed... I think Nadira Ramires, mother of the Kalpoes is next.[/quote]

I honestly don't blame any Aruban for not speaking up or offering any information they may have.  Everybody that does  gets arrested.  Yes, AVDS will probably be next.  I understand that the Holloways want and deserve to know what happened to NH, but at this point it is getting to look like a surreal black comedy.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: CancunMole on June 26, 2005, 12:39:57 AM
Quote from: "arubagirl"
Compananzi, per this link: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,160385,00.html, her friends say that she first met Joran  on the night of May 29th into May 30th. May 30th is when she was supposed to fly home.




But, that is not what ED said in the O'r interview,  and Repeat interview! Duh, even Dash (oh so sorry) looked at him like, what da F?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: DT on June 26, 2005, 12:40:33 AM
Quote from: "RB"
My daughter doesn't show up for a plane ride... I call the FBI. You punch in 411 on your phone. Maybe the chaperones called them. WHO FRIGGIN cares who called them.

My grandma was kidnapped and held for ransome 2 years ago.  The fbi was here to help us less than 48 hours after she was taken.


It actually does matter, if the speculation about insurance is true, then it is possible that this entire "how come the FBI/plane/flight plan etc" could be because if in fact there was a kidnapping/ransom situation relayed to them and the Twitty's had travel risk insurance (it's a benefit I have where I were work, for example, and Natalee would be covered since she's 18, registered for college and can be claimed as a dependent until she's out of school, I think) there's a predefined plan between the risk insurer, the policy holder (the employer) and the feds that gets followed to expedite getting the family there and FBI involved in the cases of a out CONUS traveller's disappearance.

I am not advocating that Natalee was or wasn't kidnapped: what I am saying is that if there was an indication (either a ransom phone call, Aruba police, etc) that she was, this would be handled expeditiously in the manner that's been described.


Question: Could the family just have assumed she was kidnapped and would that have sufficed for indication.  I guess what Im trying to say is would the family have any control over how the situation is handled.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: CancunMole on June 26, 2005, 12:41:14 AM
Quote from: "Charlotte"
I'm sure Beth Twitty has spoken with kids on the trip.  The article in the July 4 issue of People magazine mentions that Jug spoke with Natalee's cousins Thomas and Hunter Twitty who were on the trip and learned that Thomas has played poker with Joran that same night.


Really, and who won?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: RB on June 26, 2005, 12:41:24 AM
Quote from: "KKM"
My question to you (those who want to hear from them) is this.  After everything you have heard to date from all sources, what exactly do you want to hear from them?  What could they tell you that would solve this case?  Why is it so important for these kids to be in the public eye?

<snip>

You have already been told that nobody (especially those who were out by the pool) saw her returned to the Holiday Inn.  I think you know how highly thought of she is, along w/ her parents.  This place isn't nearly as "Stepford" as it's made out to be, it's just a small town, with small town, old fashioned values.


It's not important that they be in the public eye, BUT having said that, does anyone find it weird that this girl, who is reportedly so well liked, appears to not have confided  (by that I mean girl talk) anything about Joran Van Der Sloot to them after meeting him, and basically (if the reports and rumors are to be believed) spent time exclusively with JVDS at C&C, to the exclusion of her friends?  I'm confused by that.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: golden on June 26, 2005, 12:41:47 AM
[/quote]Thought that at first, too, but then the other guy translated it to be figurative and the source continued on with the bloody tongue stuff. Will have to go back and read it over again. Thanks! Not sure why I care, just that it would suggest to me J is the one who tried to commit suicide over this.[/quote]

JMHO, JVDS is not the suicidal type.  He probably thinks there is still a way out of this for him.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: iquitos on June 26, 2005, 12:42:25 AM
Quote from: "writenow"
Quote from: "Ladyhawke112"
Quote from: "writenow"
Quote from: "Ladyhawke112"
I'm warp-speed-reading trying to catch up. Regading an exchange between Iquitos and ExTexinAz near the end of the last thread - Is the new judge in Curacao?  If so, isn't fast and easy to take a boat to Aruba?

Also, whan I stopped reading this morning, you all were discussing the effects of date rape drugs. If you need any more first hand info, I have an unusual experience with that and would be happy to share.


Please share.

I did meet a girl (one of the first to file a lawsuit about it) who was given a roofie. She said she couldn't move.


writenow, thanks for asking. If you are unfortunate enough to be slipped one of these creepy drugs, I was very lucky. I was with my husband and daughter at a yearly crab-feed fund-raiser.  We had attended may years already; DD and her classmates performed. It's basically a family situation; everybody knows everybody. You buy your drinks - served in plastic cups and you don't think twice about leaving them at your table to socialize. What I remember is having a glass and a half of wine with a very full meal (I had thirds on crab - we knew the cook), watching the performance start about 8pm and waking up in my bad about 7am - with no knowledge of how I got there - or why I wasn't in my normal nightgown.

The good news is that we later determined that the "attack" was probably aimed at my daughter, and I am glad to have taken that hit. My husband says that I responded almost coherently to conversation, but I have no memory of doing so. At the end of the performance - he walked me to the car - again an act I do not remember.  He told me later that at one point I said, "I am so glad I'm with you." Again, no memory.

This happened about 4 years ago and even though I was protected from anything really bad happening, I cannot describe how creepy it is to awaken with part of your memory unavailable. I feel that to this day.  I cannot imagine the horror to have awakened feeling physical evidence of having been violated.

Bottom line - no matter where you are or what you are drinking - watch it being prepared and do not set it down.

Anyway  - based on what my husband told me, I was able to walk whilst drugged - so if this happened to Natalee, she might not have needed to be carried.


Wow. You were lucky. Maybe the woman I talked to could move but had the mental perception that she had no control over her body. She said she did wake up in a place she didn't recognize and didn't know how she got there.
 

was this gh vs rohypnol?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: doman4 on June 26, 2005, 12:43:07 AM
Quote from: "katya"
Quote from: "doman4"
Quote from: "katya"
Quote from: "heartache"
My daughter doesn't show up for a plane ride... I call the FBI. You punch in 411 on your phone. Maybe the chaperones called them. WHO FRIGGIN cares who called them.


And for most people they won't do anything. If you think the FBI jumps on the case of every missing American (less than 24 hours in the case), you are seriously deluded. I have some personal experience with this.


My grandma was kidnapped and held for ransome 2 years ago.  The fbi was here to help us less than 48 hours after she was taken.


Being kidnapped and held for ransom is quite different from a missing person.


TRUE...but at that point we hadnt gotten a ransome note yet


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: DT on June 26, 2005, 12:43:17 AM
Quote from: "RB"
Quote from: "KKM"
My question to you (those who want to hear from them) is this.  After everything you have heard to date from all sources, what exactly do you want to hear from them?  What could they tell you that would solve this case?  Why is it so important for these kids to be in the public eye?

<snip>

You have already been told that nobody (especially those who were out by the pool) saw her returned to the Holiday Inn.  I think you know how highly thought of she is, along w/ her parents.  This place isn't nearly as "Stepford" as it's made out to be, it's just a small town, with small town, old fashioned values.


It's not important that they be in the public eye, BUT having said that, does anyone find it weird that this girl, who is reportedly so well liked, appears to not have confided  (by that I mean girl talk) anything about Joran Van Der Sloot to them after meeting him, and basically (if the reports and rumors are to be believed) spent time exclusively with JVDS at C&C, to the exclusion of her friends?  I'm confused by that.


Whose to say that she didn't?  It may not have been anything important though, just something as simple as saying she thought he was attractive.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: CancunMole on June 26, 2005, 12:43:56 AM
Quote from: "heartache"
Who gives a RAT'S ASS when NH and Baby met? What the hell difference does it make. Lacy Peterson knew the person who killed her pretty darn well.


It means alot. Who saw it, who was pissed and cared?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: OldFart on June 26, 2005, 12:43:58 AM
Quote from: "arubagirl"
Santa Lucia is way off the main road, unless the bus had to pick up a student there as well.


arubagirl

"
Not sure where the Time Line info came from this but what do you
 make of it given the beach story? One his way home or out of the  way?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: puggywug on June 26, 2005, 12:44:11 AM
Quote from: "Ladyhawke112"
...watching the performance start about 8pm and waking up in my bad about 7am - with no knowledge of how I got there - or why I wasn't in my normal nightgown...My husband says that I responded almost coherently to conversation, but I have no memory of doing so. At the end of the performance - he walked me to the car - again an act I do not remember.  He told me later that at one point I said, "I am so glad I'm with you." Again, no memory...Anyway  - based on what my husband told me, I was able to walk whilst drugged - so if this happened to Natalee, she might not have needed to be carried.

Considering the theory Natalee was drugged, if she had a reaction similar to yours, she could have been under the influence of it as she was leaving the bar and her friends would not have noticed anything amiss in her behavior.  It could be she was already under the influence of a drug like that when she got in the car with Joran.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Charlotte on June 26, 2005, 12:44:41 AM
Quote from: "CancunMole"
Quote from: "Charlotte"
I'm sure Beth Twitty has spoken with kids on the trip.  The article in the July 4 issue of People magazine mentions that Jug spoke with Natalee's cousins Thomas and Hunter Twitty who were on the trip and learned that Thomas has played poker with Joran that same night.


Really, and who won?


Don't know


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Compananzi on June 26, 2005, 12:45:16 AM
Quote from: "columbo"
Just wondering....

Is it possible that Joran never went home at 11pm? Is it possible that he and Nat hung out from the time they met at the casino and then, went to CC together. If Joran was gambling until 10:30 (after the tourny) and Nat was at a concert untill 9:30, could it be possible that they made plans to meet up and Joran never went home?

Supposedly, Joran shows up at CC at 12- 12:30...he leaves with Nat before 1am. Is this enough time for her to trust him? Is this enough time for her to feel safe with him? Why would she be dancing/partying with someone if she briefly met him at casino and then, spent less than an hour with him at CC?? She obviously felt close enough to him to accept a ride. Perhaps they did hang out at the concert, casino and went to CC's together? Am I way off here?


Well I thought the father said to have picked up Joran at 11 pm at McDonald.  The father supposedly picked Joran up and went home...The Kalpoes are about now under way to pickup Joran to take to CnC


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: RB on June 26, 2005, 12:45:44 AM
Question: Could the family just have assumed she was kidnapped and would that have sufficed for indication. I guess what Im trying to say is would the family have any control over how the situation is handled

I'm wondering, as I did in the other thread, if there wasn't a ransom call placed as a coverup by PVDS directly after the night Natalee disappeared. And in order for a risk insurer to get involved, it must have a missing persons report from a LE authority in the country where she was missing and/or a ransom contact. The call could have been made to the hotel, the tour company, etc. Once that risk insurer is involved, things happen FAST.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: pybird on June 26, 2005, 12:46:25 AM
Quote from: "Scott"
Quote from: "pybird"

Or, were both Satish & Deepak at home?  To me, this gives Satish & Deepak an alibi that they were not there with Joren & Natalee on the beach.


It's no alibi if Deepak and/or Satish procured a drug for Joran to put in Natalee's drink.

It's also doesn't clear their names if they drove/dropped off Joran and Natalee at the van der Sloot home or a secluded location with the intent of allowing Joran to have his way with a drugged/passed out girl.


Correct.  But how do we know that they did any of the above?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: CancunMole on June 26, 2005, 12:46:44 AM
Quote from: "iquitos"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "arubagirl"
Compananzi, per this link: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,160385,00.html, her friends say that she first met Joran  on the night of May 29th into May 30th. May 30th is when she was supposed to fly home.

But, since her friends obviously didn't know where she was at all times, isn't it possible she met Joran before 5/29?


the kid on o'reilly with dash said he was around all week or something like that.  i don't think the scuffle in the casino if it happend would have gone uncommented by all.  maybe if she didn't know him she knew of him.


I am convinced that the "young adults", not "kids" who have appeared on National TV have a prepared "script". Therefore, therefore there should be the number of inconsistnecises we heard.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: arubagirl on June 26, 2005, 12:46:44 AM
Oldfart, I'm sorry, I'm not following. Out of his way? what way?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: absolut on June 26, 2005, 12:47:30 AM
You know if you discount all of the lies, retractions, disagreeing statements, and things never released in the investigation, you have a very simple answer to all this.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Anna on June 26, 2005, 12:47:53 AM
I am new to posting here but have been reading for days.  The answers to so many of these so-called concerns have already been posted here.  One example is the friends of NH saying they were all standing outside getting into taxis to go back to the HI and right then and there, NH indicated to her friend she was returning with the second group of MB students, NOT that she was going with Joren at all.

She was at the very back of the group, taxis pulling up, loading people.  Perhaps because of his size, Joren was able to shield her from their view and hustle her into their car or it was the only one left as she was at the rear of the group.  I remain convinced she thought she was getting into a taxi like everybody else before her had done.

This would explain the mother of the brothers saying she never spoke one word to them.  She thought they were taxi drivers.

I am from Alabama and am on here for the poster asking.  It gets hard to stomache all the suspicion placed on the victim, her family and even the MB kids instead of whomever did this.   :evil:   Makes my blood boil and I can only take it in small doses.  Such a desperate attempt to find some dirt on the victim or the family.  Gotta wonder why!


Title: drugs, stinative posted 14 june
Post by: iquitos on June 26, 2005, 12:47:54 AM
Rohypnol
It is a potent tranquilizer which produces a sedative effect, amnesia, muscle relaxation, and slowing of psychomotor response. The pill is distributed in 0.5,1.0 to 2.0 milligram form (Restrictions have been placed on the 2.0 mg form). It is colorless, odorless, and tasteless and dissolves without leaving any traces. It takes effect approximately 10 - 20 minutes after ingestion. Rohypnol can be added to any liquid (effect lasting 2-8 hours) but when added to alcohol it produces disinhibition and amnesia (effect lasting 8 - 24 hours). Rohypnol can be detected in the blood for 24 hours and in the urine for 48 hours. Some individuals use Rohypnol as an alcohol extender for a rapid and dramatic high. This is something to watch for in social settings if individuals seem extremely intoxicated after consuming only a small amount of alcohol. Hoffman-La Roche is working on changing the formula so trace particles or a color would appear when Rohypnol is dissolved.
Street Names: Roofies, Rope, Ruffies, R2, Ruffles, Roche, Forget-pill.

GHB
It is an odorless, colorless, liquid depressant with anesthetic qualities. It is also used as an amino acid by bodybuilders. GHB is usually distributed as a sodium salt in powder or tablet form commonly dissolved in water. This drug gives a feeling of relaxation, tranquillity, sensuality, and loss off inhibitions (especially for women). The drug takes effect 10 - 15 minutes after ingestion and lasts 2 - 3 hours unless combined with alcohol, where effect may last 20 - 30 hours. Large doses can induce sudden sleep within 5 - 10 minutes.
Street Names: Liquid Extacy, Liquid X, Scoop, Easy Lay.

Ketamine
It is a new drug that has been added to the predator drug category. It is a powerful anesthetic used as an animal tranquilizer. It is available in liquid, powder or pill form. Ketamine causes hallucinations, amnesia and dissociation (a feeling where the mind seems separated from the body) making it attractive for a potential date rapist.

Street Names: 'K', Special K, Vitamin K, Ket.
Back to top


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: DT on June 26, 2005, 12:47:56 AM
Quote from: "absolut"
You know if you discount all of the lies, retractions, disagreeing statements, and things never released in the investigation, you have a very simple answer to all this.


Which is?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: wantsanswers on June 26, 2005, 12:48:18 AM
Quote from: "RB"
Quote from: "KKM"
My question to you (those who want to hear from them) is this.  After everything you have heard to date from all sources, what exactly do you want to hear from them?  What could they tell you that would solve this case?  Why is it so important for these kids to be in the public eye?

<snip>

You have already been told that nobody (especially those who were out by the pool) saw her returned to the Holiday Inn.  I think you know how highly thought of she is, along w/ her parents.  This place isn't nearly as "Stepford" as it's made out to be, it's just a small town, with small town, old fashioned values.


It's not important that they be in the public eye, BUT having said that, does anyone find it weird that this girl, who is reportedly so well liked, appears to not have confided  (by that I mean girl talk) anything about Joran Van Der Sloot to them after meeting him, and basically (if the reports and rumors are to be believed) spent time exclusively with JVDS at C&C, to the exclusion of her friends?  I'm confused by that.


the rumours are out yes she did talk about him, but they are not talking to the press and her one friend is having a nervous breakdown,


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Kipster on June 26, 2005, 12:48:26 AM
>>Not that any of us ever believed it but found out today that Mr. Holloway is an insurance agent for a major insurance co(think Farm) so that would make it more unlikely that he would take out an insurance policy on his daughter for the purpose of defrauding.

So what  (with all due respect) dumbass came up with this insurance theory? Sorry, but if I'm a reporter reading this board and see that,  I'm handing it over to Andy Rooney.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: friend of monkeys on June 26, 2005, 12:48:38 AM
Quote from: "RB"
Question: Could the family just have assumed she was kidnapped and would that have sufficed for indication. I guess what Im trying to say is would the family have any control over how the situation is handled

I'm wondering, as I did in the other thread, if there wasn't a ransom call placed as a coverup by PVDS directly after the night Natalee disappeared. And in order for a risk insurer to get involved, it must have a missing persons report from a LE authority in the country where she was missing and/or a ransom contact. The call could have been made to the hotel, the tour company, etc. Once that risk insurer is involved, things happen FAST.


ummmmmm....yeah...
maybe too fast with cyber sex and all??
who else is on dag???

i'm crashin soon... nite all


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: KKM on June 26, 2005, 12:49:06 AM
Quote from: "mia"
Quote from: "wantsanswers"
Quote from: "arubagirl"
Compananzi, per this link: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,160385,00.html, her friends say that she first met Joran  on the night of May 29th into May 30th. May 30th is when she was supposed to fly home.


I think those girls were flakes. Dash and others saw them talking on other days.


Why didn't the Aruban police hold all those kids for questioning?  They may have missed something by letting them leave.
I HOPE somebody can go back and look at this interview - it was the remote Greta did (from Aruba) w/ Frances Ellen Byrd and Ruth McVay (from Bham) about when Natalee actually met Joran.

I should have posted this DAYS ago, but didn't realize it would become such a big point of contention.

While watching that particular interview, I remember thinking "Greta, you screwed up asking that question and now you have them all confused."  I think Greta may have stumbled around a bit asking as well.  So, if ANYONE can go back and look at that, let me know what you think.  

I am pretty sure it will show that they were ALL confused and that the question was both asked and answered inconsistently.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: TTownMike on June 26, 2005, 12:49:09 AM
Quote from: "puggywug"
Quote from: "Ladyhawke112"
...watching the performance start about 8pm and waking up in my bad about 7am - with no knowledge of how I got there - or why I wasn't in my normal nightgown...My husband says that I responded almost coherently to conversation, but I have no memory of doing so. At the end of the performance - he walked me to the car - again an act I do not remember.  He told me later that at one point I said, "I am so glad I'm with you." Again, no memory...Anyway  - based on what my husband told me, I was able to walk whilst drugged - so if this happened to Natalee, she might not have needed to be carried.

Considering the theory Natalee was drugged, if she had a reaction similar to yours, she could have been under the influence of it as she was leaving the bar and her friends would not have noticed anything amiss in her behavior.  It could be she was already under the influence of a drug like that when she got in the car with Joran.


Thats hittin the nail on the head, Pug"!


Title: Re: FBI Connection
Post by: Itawamba on June 26, 2005, 12:49:13 AM
Quote from: "friend of monkeys"
Quote from: "Itawamba"
When I had a stalker who was monitoring my phone calls on my cordless phone (not cell) and who had threatened me about the Internet (long story), I called my local cops, my 911 emergency number.

The detective who listened to my story said it was FBI jurisdiction and just patched me through to an agent.


they r definitelt well informed.


I just meant, I didn't have to look up any FBI phone numbers -- if any of Natalee's family had just called their own local 911 and told them the problem, they would've been given to the FBI.  (People were asking how they got the FBI so fast or something.)


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Ladyhawke112 on June 26, 2005, 12:51:12 AM
Quote from: "iquitos

was this gh vs rohypnol?[/quote


I hope I deleted enough quotes to comply with the owners. iquitos, it was determined to most likely be the latter, rohypnol. If I knew then what I know now, I would have gone for a blood test the minute I woke up.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: DT on June 26, 2005, 12:51:30 AM
Quote from: "Anna"

I am from Alabama and am on here for the poster asking.  It gets hard to stomache all the suspicion placed on the victim, her family and even the MB kids instead of whomever did this.   :evil:   Makes my blood boil and I can only take it in small doses.  Such a desperate attempt to find some dirt on the victim or the family.  Gotta wonder why!


Some of it I think is legitimate curiosity and trying to get all the details possible to make a good opinion about what might have happened.

But with a lot of posters I've seen it seems to be pure and simple cynicism.  They can't believe that a teenager might actually have good values and be a good person.  

And some of it is I think extreme skepticism about anything that is said in the media.  If her friends say one thing then they must be exaggereating lying.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: absolut on June 26, 2005, 12:52:06 AM
Quote from: "DT"
Quote from: "absolut"
You know if you discount all of the lies, retractions, disagreeing statements, and things never released in the investigation, you have a very simple answer to all this.


Which is?


Boy meets girl, girl meets boy (not to mince words)
Girl with friends sees boy again, friends leave
Girl leaves with boy (no assumtions)
Girl and boy get in vechicle
Vechicle drives off into the night.
Boy alive and well, as well as 2 others in the car (remember no statements are any good.)

Girl is missing and no one can tell us, how, why, when where. You have one thing left guilt.

Without statements for or against where does the guilt logically fall.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: RB on June 26, 2005, 12:53:17 AM
Makes my blood boil and I can only take it in small doses. Such a desperate attempt to find some dirt on the victim or the family. Gotta wonder why!

Anna, welcome.  I don't think any of us are attempting to find dirt, only details like this are important to us discussing who other than those that are being held might be responsible for this. I say this because I don't believe that anything is 100% guarenteed until someone signs on the dotted line...and I've always been taught not to put all my eggs in one basket until that signature is where it needs to be. Know what I mean?  I don't think some of these questions are unreasonable, given what we know at the moment.


Title: Re: FBI Connection
Post by: friend of monkeys on June 26, 2005, 12:53:46 AM
Quote from: "Itawamba"
Quote from: "friend of monkeys"
Quote from: "Itawamba"
When I had a stalker who was monitoring my phone calls on my cordless phone (not cell) and who had threatened me about the Internet (long story), I called my local cops, my 911 emergency number.

The detective who listened to my story said it was FBI jurisdiction and just patched me through to an agent.


they r definitelt well informed.


I just meant, I didn't have to look up any FBI phone numbers -- if any of Natalee's family had just called their own local 911 and told them the problem, they would've been given to the FBI.  (People were asking how they got the FBI so fast or something.)


right. If you believe you have info you can share it.
In the event it is mportant- they;'ll call you/
every bit helps!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Whitney on June 26, 2005, 12:54:15 AM
Quote from: "arubagirl"
Nancy_Drew, I don't see where we differ. If Paul van der Sloot heard something suspicious, but information that he didn't get from Joran, he's supposed to tell. Natalee screaming, door slamming at odd hours, etc. If he saw Natalee in his house he's also supposed to tell
If Joran came to him and said: Dad, I left NH alone on the beach and she was abducted by aliens, Paul van der Sloot is not obligated from saying that to the cops.


I'm so far behind...like 12 pages or so behind, you.

But absent the "confession" from any VDS family member or another close to this and tied to this, Arubagirl's implied-point that this duo's game is obviously wait-it-out for 3 1/2 months and go to trial on very flimsy evidence.

I'm sure this has been discussed X infinity and I'll see it in the next 15 pages as a I catch up.

I'm still not a true believer in the the Jug/Geraldo system of justice...{b]not ready to torch JVDS and/or the imputed conspirator, the "Dutch-slimeball-pour-it-on-demon-seed-father" Paulus; how can we be convinced before the Aruba court reveals its case?  

They make it impossible to definitely conclude otherwise in my notebook.

However, in 3 1/2 months, if it's shown that this is what they have, then I'm with those who say, it's not a very good place to vacation...Aruba...may be a great place for sailing and beach sitting...but there are places better for law.

Whitney


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: DT on June 26, 2005, 12:54:38 AM
Quote from: "absolut"
Quote from: "DT"
Quote from: "absolut"
You know if you discount all of the lies, retractions, disagreeing statements, and things never released in the investigation, you have a very simple answer to all this.


Which is?


Boy meets girl, girl meets boy (not to mince words)
Girl with friends sees boy again, friends leave
Girl leaves with boy (no assumtions)
Girl and boy get in vechicle
Vechicle drives off into the night.
Boy alive and well, as well as 2 others in the car (remember no statements are any good.)

Girl is missing and no one can tell us, how, why, when where. You have one thing left guilt.

Without statements for or against where does the guilt logically fall.


On the boy obviously.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: writenow on June 26, 2005, 12:55:23 AM
Quote from: "golden"
I honestly don't blame any Aruban for not speaking up or offering any information they may have.  Everybody that does  gets arrested.  


They haven't arrested Lorenzo, Max or Larissa yet.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Arlee on June 26, 2005, 12:55:42 AM
Quote from: "Kipster"
>>Way offf...The FBI did INDEED talk to all the kids!

Though I agree: Link? Quote? Proof? All I have seen or read says they have interviewed 'most'.


At the time they interviewed my daughter, I looked at the list and they'd already gotten about 90% of them.  That was over a week ago.

So, eyewitness account, if you'll accept that.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Selena on June 26, 2005, 12:56:00 AM
Ladyhawke or Liquid X, you can make it at home, odorless and colorless, looks like water, how easy is it to put in a drink at a br though, nuless you are buying. How was Nat drinking at the bar, from what I heard all she had on her was a drivers license, and I didn't see pockets on her skirt, Could someone else have bought her drinks, maybe even Joran?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: CancunMole on June 26, 2005, 12:56:05 AM
Quote from: "iquitos"
aua girl has been here today.  

Quote from: "CancunMole"
Oh, why aren't ArubaGirl , NativeLingo or any of the other 'on Island folks' on or staying on the board t help us know what is going on and to translate for us? Oh, maybe because we are insulting idiots or by definition, UGLY AMERICANS????????


Sorry, this was not a QUESTION, it was a response.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: friend of monkeys on June 26, 2005, 12:57:06 AM
Quote from: "writenow"
Quote from: "golden"
I honestly don't blame any Aruban for not speaking up or offering any information they may have.  Everybody that does  gets arrested.  


They haven't arrested Lorenzo, Max or Larissa yet.



maybe lorenzoe is dead???
killed in speedboat accident??


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: iquitos on June 26, 2005, 12:57:06 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
I am new to posting here but have been reading for days.  The answers to so many of these so-called concerns have already been posted here.  One example is the friends of NH saying they were all standing outside getting into taxis to go back to the HI and right then and there, NH indicated to her friend she was returning with the second group of MB students, NOT that she was going with Joren at all.

She was at the very back of the group, taxis pulling up, loading people.  Perhaps because of his size, Joren was able to shield her from their view and hustle her into their car or it was the only one left as she was at the rear of the group.  I remain convinced she thought she was getting into a taxi like everybody else before her had done.

This would explain the mother of the brothers saying she never spoke one word to them.  She thought they were taxi drivers.

I am from Alabama and am on here for the poster asking.  It gets hard to stomache all the suspicion placed on the victim, her family and even the MB kids instead of whomever did this.   :evil:   Makes my blood boil and I can only take it in small doses.  Such a desperate attempt to find some dirt on the victim or the family.  Gotta wonder why!


I find this "though it was a taxi" an odd explanation which smacks of party line.  does that mean nobody from mb knew natalee left with Joran or that the joran and the Kalpoes were in the club and Joran was with Natalee at some point even though there were witnesses and a scuffle between Joran and some MBers outside the club according to more than one source?   And what about he Yahooo Aruba story where some MBers saw Natalee stick her head out of the car and yell out?  Did they think that was a taxi too?  If nobody saw her get in the car with Joran or thought it was a taxi, how can anyone be sure she left with Joran?  Of course we know she did becaue Joran admitted as much.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: puggywug on June 26, 2005, 12:57:37 AM
Quote from: "TTownMike"
Quote from: "puggywug"
Quote from: "Ladyhawke112"
...watching the performance start about 8pm and waking up in my bad about 7am - with no knowledge of how I got there - or why I wasn't in my normal nightgown...My husband says that I responded almost coherently to conversation, but I have no memory of doing so. At the end of the performance - he walked me to the car - again an act I do not remember.  He told me later that at one point I said, "I am so glad I'm with you." Again, no memory...Anyway  - based on what my husband told me, I was able to walk whilst drugged - so if this happened to Natalee, she might not have needed to be carried.

Considering the theory Natalee was drugged, if she had a reaction similar to yours, she could have been under the influence of it as she was leaving the bar and her friends would not have noticed anything amiss in her behavior.  It could be she was already under the influence of a drug like that when she got in the car with Joran.

Thats hittin the nail on the head, Pug"!

HEY, TT!  I've missed you lately.  Guess we've been on at different times.  :D


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: arubagirl on June 26, 2005, 12:58:28 AM
Well, somebody told Beth Twitty that she were leaving with Joran, or did the Alabama group just go to the van der Sloots because NH and Joran were talking in the casino?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: wantsanswers on June 26, 2005, 12:58:53 AM
Quote from: "iquitos"
Quote from: "Anna"
I am new to posting here but have been reading for days.  The answers to so many of these so-called concerns have already been posted here.  One example is the friends of NH saying they were all standing outside getting into taxis to go back to the HI and right then and there, NH indicated to her friend she was returning with the second group of MB students, NOT that she was going with Joren at all.

She was at the very back of the group, taxis pulling up, loading people.  Perhaps because of his size, Joren was able to shield her from their view and hustle her into their car or it was the only one left as she was at the rear of the group.  I remain convinced she thought she was getting into a taxi like everybody else before her had done.

This would explain the mother of the brothers saying she never spoke one word to them.  She thought they were taxi drivers.

I am from Alabama and am on here for the poster asking.  It gets hard to stomache all the suspicion placed on the victim, her family and even the MB kids instead of whomever did this.   :evil:   Makes my blood boil and I can only take it in small doses.  Such a desperate attempt to find some dirt on the victim or the family.  Gotta wonder why!


I find this "though it was a taxi" an odd explanation which smacks of party line.  does that mean nobody from mb knew natalee left with Joran or that the joran and the Kalpoes were in the club and Joran was with Natalee at some point even though there were witnesses and a scuffle between Joran and some MBers outside the club acording to more than one source?   And what about he Yahooo Aruba story where some MBers saw Natalee stick her head out of the car and yell out?  Did they think that was a taxi too?  If nobody saw her get in the car with joran or though it was a taxi, how can anyone be sure she left with Joran?  Of course we know she did becaue Joran admitted as much.


Drugged dear!! Sounds like a classic case


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: bobntexas on June 26, 2005, 12:58:57 AM
[/quote]
Quote from: "DT"
Quote from: "Anna"

I am from Alabama and am on here for the poster asking.  It gets hard to stomache all the suspicion placed on the victim, her family and even the MB kids instead of whomever did this.   :evil:   Makes my blood boil and I can only take it in small doses.  Such a desperate attempt to find some dirt on the victim or the family.  Gotta wonder why!


Some of it I think is legitimate curiosity and trying to get all the details possible to make a good opinion about what might have happened.

But with a lot of posters I've seen it seems to be pure and simple cynicism.  They can't believe that a teenager might actually have good values and be a good person.  

And some of it is I think extreme skepticism about anything that is said in the media.  If her friends say one thing then they must be exaggereating lying.
Quote


There are also some trouble makers that just go through life making life disagreeable for others and they show up in discussion threads.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: RB on June 26, 2005, 12:59:52 AM
There are also some trouble makers that just go through life making life disagreeable for others and they show up in discussion threads.

Yes bob, there sure are :)


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Compananzi on June 26, 2005, 01:00:04 AM
Quote from: "CancunMole"
Quote from: "Charlotte"
I'm sure Beth Twitty has spoken with kids on the trip.  The article in the July 4 issue of People magazine mentions that Jug spoke with Natalee's cousins Thomas and Hunter Twitty who were on the trip and learned that Thomas has played poker with Joran that same night.


Really, and who won?
Or the question is who lost? and how much?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: iquitos on June 26, 2005, 01:00:12 AM
Quote from: "Selena"
Ladyhawke or Liquid X, you can make it at home, odorless and colorless, looks like water, how easy is it to put in a drink at a br though, nuless you are buying. How was Nat drinking at the bar, from what I heard all she had on her was a drivers license, and I didn't see pockets on her skirt, Could someone else have bought her drinks, maybe even Joran?
 

she would have taken some emergency money too.  and maybe she won one of the free drink contests.  joran came on the scene late.  one bartender report  (not confirmed) said she had five vodka drinks.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Anna on June 26, 2005, 01:00:21 AM
I listened to the interview of Jug Twitty tonight and he did NOT say AVDS was going to be detained at all.  He said he would like to see her questioned as would I.  Why not?  Because she goes on TV and cries?  Because she says Joren is a good boy who does not even drink??  :?:

I think she could answer a great many questions that might be helpful such as are there any household cleaning supplies missing.  Not that I would expect her to tell the truth but I would really like to know if the bleach for example was still intact.  We know she lies from her saying Joren did not do any of the things he is shown in the photos doing.  But bleach destroys DNA as do other caustic chemicals.  Oh, it is probably useless anyway.  Everything seems that way in this case, having been so bungled at the beginning, there is no way to recover from that.  Whomever did it, Joren or otherwise, were given such a headstart at destroying all evidence, how could they not succeed?  

But did AVDS see anything out of the ordinary, etc.?  While I would be very surprised if she told the truth, at least she could be on record refusing to do so and perhaps this is some offense under this legal system.  Apparently, obstruction of justice is not at least that is what I am told.  I do not see how any judicial system could even begin to function without something to forbid obstructing investigations.  

But both the mothers of the boys go on TV and cry and cry while Beth does not and forces herself to maintain composure.  She is the one who might be crying.  That tells me a great deal but mostly that Beth knows her child has not done anything wrong.  And the mothers cry because they cannot see their boys.  Well, boo hoo!  I think Beth might want to see her daughter about now but guess what?  She probaby never will again, at least not alive, and these boys know something and are refusing to even tell what they do know and have even lied to throw off LE from any chance of finding NH.

My last hope is with the search team, if they fail to find anything, guess it is pretty much over and they (whomever) just got away with it.   :cry:


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: wantsanswers on June 26, 2005, 01:00:31 AM
Quote from: "bobntexas"
Quote from: "DT"
Quote from: "Anna"

I am from Alabama and am on here for the poster asking.  It gets hard to stomache all the suspicion placed on the victim, her family and even the MB kids instead of whomever did this.   :evil:   Makes my blood boil and I can only take it in small doses.  Such a desperate attempt to find some dirt on the victim or the family.  Gotta wonder why!


Some of it I think is legitimate curiosity and trying to get all the details possible to make a good opinion about what might have happened.

But with a lot of posters I've seen it seems to be pure and simple cynicism.  They can't believe that a teenager might actually have good values and be a good person.  

And some of it is I think extreme skepticism about anything that is said in the media.  If her friends say one thing then they must be exaggereating lying.
Quote

Amen to that

There are also some trouble makers that just go through life making life disagreeable for others and they show up in discussion threads.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Whitney on June 26, 2005, 01:00:31 AM
Quote from: "Compananzi"
Quote from: "arubagirl"
coco, according to Canal 90 they have interrogated AvdS


I think its a bit disgusting to see Jug smile with glee at Paul's arrest.  He'll probably be so happy if they charge AVDS as well.

You know when people get killed or murdered you always see the family crying and sobbing...I have not seen it in MSM. Maybe they cry off camera, but it sure looks cold to me...it raises no sympathy...so I hope hope the spin doc relay this to the them.


I've commented before on those extended family dynamics and your conclusions are not exactly as my own; however, Jug's public (on TV behavior over these past three weeks certainly allows enough to comment upon his interaction with Beth and that with NH....)  I offer his public statement about his relationship with his bio-son...was that George, last night, and his comments about Natalee...

If you heard it, you know what I heard...and if you didn't then you didn't...suffice to say it was different...it was.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: columbo on June 26, 2005, 01:00:59 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
I am new to posting here but have been reading for days.  The answers to so many of these so-called concerns have already been posted here.  One example is the friends of NH saying they were all standing outside getting into taxis to go back to the HI and right then and there, NH indicated to her friend she was returning with the second group of MB students, NOT that she was going with Joren at all.

She was at the very back of the group, taxis pulling up, loading people.  Perhaps because of his size, Joren was able to shield her from their view and hustle her into their car or it was the only one left as she was at the rear of the group.  I remain convinced she thought she was getting into a taxi like everybody else before her had done.

This would explain the mother of the brothers saying she never spoke one word to them.  She thought they were taxi drivers.

I am from Alabama and am on here for the poster asking.  It gets hard to stomache all the suspicion placed on the victim, her family and even the MB kids instead of whomever did this.   :evil:   Makes my blood boil and I can only take it in small doses.  Such a desperate attempt to find some dirt on the victim or the family.  Gotta wonder why!


Wow. Sorry you're so offended by what we're all typing here. I don't think there is anyone on this board who would say they don't feel badly about Natalee's disappearance or who don't feel her parent's pain. That being said, please keep in mind taht this board is set up for people who are interested in solving crimes. We are simply trying to put the peices of the puzzle together. I can see how someone related to the victim could take offense to it, and I'm sorry, but that doesn't change the purpose of this board. Noone is here to "blame" Natalee or her family.....we are just trying to place the peices to the puzzle, the same way we've been trying to place the peices to the puzzle of the Van Der Sloots.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: pybird on June 26, 2005, 01:01:06 AM
Quote from: "absolut"
You know if you discount all of the lies, retractions, disagreeing statements, and things never released in the investigation, you have a very simple answer to all this.


I'm all Monkey Ears...Spill it     LOL


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Selena on June 26, 2005, 01:01:09 AM
the flight left for Alabama at 2Pm from Aruba? I'm sure between those hours and the hurs that the Twitty's left they were at least able to talk to the cousins.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: absolut on June 26, 2005, 01:01:24 AM
Quote from: "Compananzi"
Quote from: "CancunMole"
Quote from: "Charlotte"
I'm sure Beth Twitty has spoken with kids on the trip.  The article in the July 4 issue of People magazine mentions that Jug spoke with Natalee's cousins Thomas and Hunter Twitty who were on the trip and learned that Thomas has played poker with Joran that same night.


Really, and who won?
Or the question is who lost? and how much?


If it was the same tourney on sunday Joran finished 4th, I believe that is a jug reference.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: coco on June 26, 2005, 01:03:23 AM
DT - I think part of the questioning is that it's really rare to see a public case like this that is so completely controlled in terms of media coverage and image. Just thinking in comparison to say the Elizabeth Smart case where there were all sorts of runours and innuendoes and such - not condoning those but that's how the media operates and we don't see it here.

I also don't think it's that people find it hard to believe that there are good kids - I sure do believe there are good kids but I know that they are not perfect and more multidimensional than that - couple this with the image of "good kids with good morals" who go to Aruba for open bar all inclusive, casinos and Carlos and Charlie's at night ... it's an interesting picture of what our culture not considers "good."

And I think that that is part of what stirs interest in the case - we're seeing an image of acceptable or even "good" young adult behavior that is very different from the definition that many of us grew up with. This is not ... NOT ... blaming Natalee or the parents or anything like that - it's about Natalee as a symbol for a shift in our culture and how we react. These discussions are probably not meant for folks who are close to the situation itself - for you all, it's personal and about someone you know. But online, in a blog, etc it becomes also about ideas and broader cultural implications. One thing I value here is that I don't think anyone, no matter what their theory of the case, forgets that at the core is the disappearance of a lovely young woman who did not deserve whatever has happened to her - and I think we all ache for her and her family.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: writenow on June 26, 2005, 01:03:48 AM
Quote from: "CancunMole"
I am convinced that the "young adults", not "kids" who have appeared on National TV have a prepared "script". Therefore, therefore there should be the number of inconsistnecises we heard.


Apparently you haven't met our little Dash.

No scripts, Cancun. You're reaching here.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: TTownMike on June 26, 2005, 01:03:59 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
I am new to posting here but have been reading for days.  The answers to so many of these so-called concerns have already been posted here.  One example is the friends of NH saying they were all standing outside getting into taxis to go back to the HI and right then and there, NH indicated to her friend she was returning with the second group of MB students, NOT that she was going with Joren at all.

She was at the very back of the group, taxis pulling up, loading people.  Perhaps because of his size, Joren was able to shield her from their view and hustle her into their car or it was the only one left as she was at the rear of the group.  I remain convinced she thought she was getting into a taxi like everybody else before her had done.

This would explain the mother of the brothers saying she never spoke one word to them.  She thought they were taxi drivers.

I am from Alabama and am on here for the poster asking.  It gets hard to stomache all the suspicion placed on the victim, her family and even the MB kids instead of whomever did this.   :evil:   Makes my blood boil and I can only take it in small doses.  Such a desperate attempt to find some dirt on the victim or the family.  Gotta wonder why!


YOU TELLUM BOUT IT ANNA!  Folks tend to forget about drugs and for some reason want to accept the Nat willingly left with JvS after meeting 30 mins before!  Gimme a break!  He's known to be a liar about all this and she's not here to explain, but bein as she's gone, and he's incriminated himself, one should conclude he had more agenda than she did!  She is the victim!  I cannot accept anything except she thought, when she got in the car, that it was a ride to the HI.  With the three amigos there I'm sure she found herself where she didnt intend to be very soon if not instatntly!  I dont necessarily believe even that there was a trip to lghthse!  All we know of what the 3 have said is that "that was their story and they" INTENDED to stick to it!  ONce they start sqirming who knows whos still lying or fessin!  I dont think either Urine or the bros have told MUCH TRUTH IF ANY!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Selena on June 26, 2005, 01:04:19 AM
I am shorter and weigh less than Nat, but I tell you what, after 5 vodka drinks they'd be carrying me to a cab.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: wantsanswers on June 26, 2005, 01:05:13 AM
Quote from: "Whitney"
Quote from: "Compananzi"
Quote from: "arubagirl"
coco, according to Canal 90 they have interrogated AvdS


I think its a bit disgusting to see Jug smile with glee at Paul's arrest.  He'll probably be so happy if they charge AVDS as well.

You know when people get killed or murdered you always see the family crying and sobbing...I have not seen it in MSM. Maybe they cry off camera, but it sure looks cold to me...it raises no sympathy...so I hope hope the spin doc relay this to the them.


I've commented before on those extended family dynamics and your conclusions are not exactly as my own; however, Jug's public (on TV behavior over these past three weeks certainly allows enough to comment upon his interaction with Beth and that with NH....)  I offer his public statement about his relationship with his bio-son...was that George, last night, and his comments about Natalee...

If you heard it, you know what I heard...and if you didn't then you didn't...suffice to say it was different...it was.


As for the parents, its been a long time and they are in the anger stage, everyone does that, I can say that from experience. As for teh kids, they seem very, very immature.  Almost like nothing really has happened. Some of the girls might have been jealous, some not talking maybe can't because of grief.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: puggywug on June 26, 2005, 01:05:31 AM
Quote from: "iquitos"
Quote from: "Selena"
Ladyhawke or Liquid X, you can make it at home, odorless and colorless, looks like water, how easy is it to put in a drink at a br though, nuless you are buying. How was Nat drinking at the bar, from what I heard all she had on her was a drivers license, and I didn't see pockets on her skirt, Could someone else have bought her drinks, maybe even Joran?
 
she would have taken some emergency money too.  and maybe she won one of the free drink contests.  joran came on the scene late.  one bartender report  (not confirmed) said she had five vodka drinks.

How would a bartender remember how many drinks she had if
1) it was a crowded bar with many people buying drinks
2) there were other blonde young women at the bar
How can the bartender be sure she had 5 drinks?  And what if she picked up drinks for other people? Just asking


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: OldFart on June 26, 2005, 01:05:49 AM
Quote from: "arubagirl"
Oldfart, I'm sorry, I'm not following. Out of his way? what way?

There was a time line post (not usere of source) that was
"6:30 am Call to or from Joran’s cellphone in area of Santa Lucia"
Just wondering where that was?
thnks


Title: No dirt
Post by: Itawamba on June 26, 2005, 01:07:13 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
I am new to posting here but have been reading for days.  The answers to so many of these so-called concerns have already been posted here.  One example is the friends of NH saying they were all standing outside getting into taxis to go back to the HI and right then and there, NH indicated to her friend she was returning with the second group of MB students, NOT that she was going with Joren at all.

She was at the very back of the group, taxis pulling up, loading people.  Perhaps because of his size, Joren was able to shield her from their view and hustle her into their car or it was the only one left as she was at the rear of the group.  I remain convinced she thought she was getting into a taxi like everybody else before her had done.

This would explain the mother of the brothers saying she never spoke one word to them.  She thought they were taxi drivers.

I am from Alabama and am on here for the poster asking.  It gets hard to stomache all the suspicion placed on the victim, her family and even the MB kids instead of whomever did this.   :evil:   Makes my blood boil and I can only take it in small doses.  Such a desperate attempt to find some dirt on the victim or the family.  Gotta wonder why!


Hi, Anna--glad you posted.  I think what is *significant* is that there is NO DIRT to find about Natalee.  It's good that all these questions are being asked.

I hate to bring up Jennifer Wilbanks, but for lack of a better example, you see what the public found out *after* she had gone missing and all had searched for her (I had gone into my 24/7 sleuthing mode by Day 3, after following a bit to see more about the case)--her parents withheld some info that would've been relevant.  She had a shady background that no one knew about.  Turned out to be a hoax as far as her being missing.

While it's hard to look at all this *crime* lingo and suspicion being directed at youngsters of yours and your friends, it is necessary and it's the only way Natalee will be found or justice will be served for her.  God bless you for being her friend.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Whitney on June 26, 2005, 01:07:21 AM
Quote from: "[b
CancunMole[/b]"]
Quote from: "arubagirl"
If Jug said that, and AvdS is going to be detained, then I guess we know who's running the show.

AvdS wasn't on the island, so she couldn't see/hear anything. And anything that JvdS told her she doesn't have to reveal, so basically, there is no point.


This, I'm sure will not be popular but, my dog wouldn't let Jug in my house with all his vinegar. To me, the way the vdSs' dogs reacted to strangers, told me volumes about them as people who live/brought the dogs up. Barking but tails awagin'.


CancunMole...sort of my point I'll be making...

If you saw the tape with Greta and Beth Holloway/Twitty making that surprise visit to the VDS-household...there was NO BARKING...in fact, there was tail-wagging behaviour by both of the dogs...and I think that voice was Beth HT's voice calling out, initially to the dogs, and then yelling, 'are you home?' to the inhabitants...all the dogs continued to wag their tales...with heads BOWED...


They knew that Beth had authority...there was NO DOUBT.

...and this is my last edit...the first was to place those ' and '....

the homeys...the VDS peeps, the owners and 'feeder' of these dogs-beasts-watchers were home!...for a woman as Beth to win over these doggers so easily says a lot about Beth and the owners of this household...

these people are very you-and-me peeps, IMHO.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Kipster on June 26, 2005, 01:07:24 AM
Your "90%" interviewed confirmed the "most" part I read or saw, thank you arlee. :)

Please note in my earlier post that I agreed with you. The 'authorities' would not be doing their jobs (IMO) if they didn't have a sit-down with 100% within a week, and it probably would not behoove any involved to make it a public statement of fact that the interviews are 100% complete.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: writenow on June 26, 2005, 01:07:41 AM
Quote from: "Selena"
I am shorter and weigh less than Nat, but I tell you what, after 5 vodka drinks they'd be carrying me to a cab.


And the fact that they weren't carrying her shows she didn't drink 5 vodkas.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: arubagirl on June 26, 2005, 01:07:45 AM
It's actually in the middle of nowhere ;).

At 6.30 am, if that's when the phone call took place, it looks very early for him to be already in the bus.

But damn, to go hide a body or evidence of a crime THAT far? Why?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Ladyhawke112 on June 26, 2005, 01:08:05 AM
Quote from: "Selena"
Ladyhawke or Liquid X, you can make it at home, odorless and colorless, looks like water, how easy is it to put in a drink at a br though, nuless you are buying. How was Nat drinking at the bar, from what I heard all she had on her was a drivers license, and I didn't see pockets on her skirt, Could someone else have bought her drinks, maybe even Joran?


Selena, unfortunately, whether she bought or not, unless she was carefully watching how what was served was prepared and keeping an eye on the beverage as it was delivered, particularly near closing time, she was in jeapardy. I'm guessing, as there was a time I would have felt likewise, that she paid no attention.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: TTownMike on June 26, 2005, 01:08:23 AM
Quote from: "wantsanswers"
Quote from: "RB"
Quote from: "KKM"
My question to you (those who want to hear from them) is this.  After everything you have heard to date from all sources, what exactly do you want to hear from them?  What could they tell you that would solve this case?  Why is it so important for these kids to be in the public eye?

<snip>

You have already been told that nobody (especially those who were out by the pool) saw her returned to the Holiday Inn.  I think you know how highly thought of she is, along w/ her parents.  This place isn't nearly as "Stepford" as it's made out to be, it's just a small town, with small town, old fashioned values.


It's not important that they be in the public eye, BUT having said that, does anyone find it weird that this girl, who is reportedly so well liked, appears to not have confided  (by that I mean girl talk) anything about Joran Van Der Sloot to them after meeting him, and basically (if the reports and rumors are to be believed) spent time exclusively with JVDS at C&C, to the exclusion of her friends?  I'm confused by that.


the rumours are out yes she did talk about him, but they are not talking to the press and her one friend is having a nervous breakdown,


It makes best sense that if she ha any idea she was going AWAY from her friends, SHE WOULD HAVE TOLD SOMEONE WHERE SHE WAS GOING!  (But then, if drugged, who knows what she may have been able to think or do or say!)


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Anna on June 26, 2005, 01:08:25 AM
>>Hi, LUNA. As you can see, I'm Puggywug. I post this alot when there are questions about Natalee getting in the car. Here is a quote from Dash's mom who also posts here:

"My daughter spoke with Natalee right after C&C's closed. My daughter & her friends came across Nat & Joran as all were exiting the club, and all were walking more or less together toward another group of classmates...

Natalee was walking unassisted (not falling down drunk), spoke ok (though not answering in long sentences), and was not touching Joran.

Nat assured them that she was fine, and said she was going to go back to the hotel "with THEM," pointing to the MBHS group just a few yards ahead. The Kalpoes were nowhere in sight; neither was the car.

Next {woman’s daughter} heard was that Natalee got into a car that many in the group had thought was a taxi. (Those look like regular cars.) It may be that the Kalpoes pulled up on the street before Natalee reached the next group; Joran may have deliberately stalled her. The group may not have even realized she was behind them, approaching.

But while we hear that she got in the car willingly, we know from her comments that it was not her pre-planned intention. Because of this, I do not believe she knew she would be going anywhere but a fairly short distance down to the hotel. Her plans changed in the blink of an eye, and she was gone . . .“
 
http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/Discussion/viewtopic.php?t=303&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=400<<

Well, I really can't help how odd anybody finds this but it has been explained over and over and even on this forum.  And NH has been called some very vile names by the Joren fan club because she got into this car but the poster just a few pages back stated that under the influence of a date rape drug that she walked/talked fairly normally.  While some may not like this version, it is the closest thing we have to what actually happened, an eyewitness account from somebody who spoke to her just an instant before they were loading into the car.

Sure looks like to me she did not even intend to go with Joren.  And there was a link yesterday to an article on the Dark Side about the practice called carving out where males surround the female victim to separate her from her group which it seems is sadly a common practice in the region.  Block her from their view and they from hers and just sort of jostle her along to the waiting car or whatever.

I can't believe everybody missed this post.  And I sometimes wonder why the same questions are asked over and over and over, even on the same day.  Sure, we all miss a bunch of posts but it just seems so odd to come here day after day and the same questions being asked yet again.  Sometimes by the same people.

What's up with that? :?:


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: golden on June 26, 2005, 01:08:28 AM
Quote from: "wantsanswers"
the rumours are out yes she did talk about him, but they are not talking to the press and her one friend is having a nervous breakdown,


This is really the saddest part, how many people will be continuously affected by this sad situation,the Holloways, Twittys, VDS, Kaploes and everyone close to them will have to deal with this for a very long time.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Selena on June 26, 2005, 01:09:02 AM
Puggy
At CnC's they POUR drinks down your throat! there is a conga line, when it passes the DJ booth people get shots down their throats, the waiters come to your table and pour shots, everyone can participate in contests where half the bar wins shots, it would be IMPOSSIBLe to keep up with one girls drinks!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: DT on June 26, 2005, 01:09:07 AM
Quote from: "coco"
DT - I think part of the questioning is that it's really rare to see a public case like this that is so completely controlled in terms of media coverage and image. Just thinking in comparison to say the Elizabeth Smart case where there were all sorts of runours and innuendoes and such - not condoning those but that's how the media operates and we don't see it here.

I also don't think it's that people find it hard to believe that there are good kids - I sure do believe there are good kids but I know that they are not perfect and more multidimensional than that - couple this with the image of "good kids with good morals" who go to Aruba for open bar all inclusive, casinos and Carlos and Charlie's at night ... it's an interesting picture of what our culture not considers "good."

And I think that that is part of what stirs interest in the case - we're seeing an image of acceptable or even "good" young adult behavior that is very different from the definition that many of us grew up with. This is not ... NOT ... blaming Natalee or the parents or anything like that - it's about Natalee as a symbol for a shift in our culture and how we react. These discussions are probably not meant for folks who are close to the situation itself - for you all, it's personal and about someone you know. But online, in a blog, etc it becomes also about ideas and broader cultural implications. One thing I value here is that I don't think anyone, no matter what their theory of the case, forgets that at the core is the disappearance of a lovely young woman who did not deserve whatever has happened to her - and I think we all ache for her and her family.

But you're missing the point no one is claiming anyone is perfect.  They're claiming she was a very good person with good morals.  Nothing we know yet contradicts that. We don't know how much she drank or even if she gambled.  I wouldn't be surprised if she did both of these things.  But I think that is entirely consistent with a person who has good morals.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: golden on June 26, 2005, 01:09:36 AM
Quote from: "writenow"
Quote from: "golden"
I honestly don't blame any Aruban for not speaking up or offering any information they may have.  Everybody that does  gets arrested.  


They haven't arrested Lorenzo, Max or Larissa yet.


They are probably on the list.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: CancunMole on June 26, 2005, 01:11:39 AM
Quote from: "Kipster"
>>Oh, why aren't ArubaGirl , NativeLingo or any of the other 'on Island folks' on or staying on the board to help us know what is going on and to translate for us?

Oh, maybe because we are insulting idiots or by definition, UGLY AMERICANS????????

Aww, their hides are leathered from dealing vis-a-vis with our dumbasses daily. Lil message board adrenaline shouldn't scare them off. ;) However, what happened to --- & other AL folk?


This is absolutely true OIMO. I probably should have separated the question from my own answer................


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: wantsanswers on June 26, 2005, 01:12:05 AM
Quote from: "Whitney"
Quote from: "[b
CancunMole[/b]"]
Quote from: "arubagirl"
If Jug said that, and AvdS is going to be detained, then I guess we know who's running the show.

AvdS wasn't on the island, so she couldn't see/hear anything. And anything that JvdS told her she doesn't have to reveal, so basically, there is no point.


This, I'm sure will not be popular but, my dog wouldn't let Jug in my house with all his vinegar. To me, the way the vdSs' dogs reacted to strangers, told me volumes about them as people who live/brought the dogs up. Barking but tails awagin'.


CancunMole...sort of my point I'll be making...

If you saw the tape with Greta and Beth Holloway/Twitty making that surprise visit to the VDS-household...there was NO BARKING...in fact, there was tail-wagging behaviour by both of the dogs...and I think that voice was Beth HT's voice calling out, initially to the dogs, and then yelling, 'are you home?' to the inhabitants...all the dogs continued to wag their tales...with heads BOWED...


They knew that Beth had authority...there was NO DOUBT.


I think its sad some of you guys are afraid of Jug, a lot of hot air like Trump. I don't really care for that type of attitude, I wouldn't jump down his throat.. That is how they hide their emotions, don't cry or they will think you are weak. Trump says that to everyone.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Ladyhawke112 on June 26, 2005, 01:12:18 AM
Quote from: "arubagirl"
Well, somebody told Beth Twitty that she were leaving with Joran, or did the Alabama group just go to the van der Sloots because NH and Joran were talking in the casino?


arubagirl, in probably watching way to much FoxNews, I think it was reported that the VDS' were disclosed to the Twittys by a bartender (or other worker) at C&C's.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: writenow on June 26, 2005, 01:12:28 AM
Quote from: "OldFart"
Quote from: "arubagirl"
Oldfart, I'm sorry, I'm not following. Out of his way? what way?

There was a time line post (not usere of source) that was
"6:30 am Call to or from Joran’s cellphone in area of Santa Lucia"
Just wondering where that was?
thnks


this info came out awhile ago, but could be inaccurate. Can't remember now how it got out to the press. One of the lawyers? family? can't remember.


Title: hand gesture
Post by: dl3fan on June 26, 2005, 01:12:50 AM
Maybe if someone in LE would give Joran a "shocker" (the hand gesture in all the tickle.com pictures) he might start talkin!  Or at least squirmin and squealin


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: TTownMike on June 26, 2005, 01:13:17 AM
Quote from: "absolut"
Quote from: "DT"
Quote from: "absolut"
You know if you discount all of the lies, retractions, disagreeing statements, and things never released in the investigation, you have a very simple answer to all this.


Which is?


Boy meets girl, girl meets boy (not to mince words)
Girl with friends sees boy again, friends leave
Girl leaves with boy (no assumtions)
Girl and boy get in vechicle
Vechicle drives off into the night.
Boy alive and well, as well as 2 others in the car (remember no statements are any good.)

Girl is missing and no one can tell us, how, why, when where. You have one thing left guilt.

Without statements for or against where does the guilt logically fall.


Absoulutely, absolut! In a nutshell, thats exactly what we've got and where we are!  The only questions after that are really who did how much bad and who did more or less in a crime!

 Well put!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Sobelle on June 26, 2005, 01:13:25 AM
Quote from: "OldFart"
Quote from: "arubagirl"
Oldfart, I'm sorry, I'm not following. Out of his way? what way?

There was a time line post (not usere of source) that was
"6:30 am Call to or from Joran’s cellphone in area of Santa Lucia"
Just wondering where that was?
thnks



Here's a map of Aruba that has sites of interests marked. marked.http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/Images-Fun/map3.pdf


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: arubagirl on June 26, 2005, 01:14:23 AM
Thanks, Ladyhawke. If that's the case then that would also imply that Joran was a regular C&C customer.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: writenow on June 26, 2005, 01:14:27 AM
Quote from: "arubagirl"
Well, somebody told Beth Twitty that she were leaving with Joran, or did the Alabama group just go to the van der Sloots because NH and Joran were talking in the casino?


They did also go the CnCs. But I'm also sure they were on the phone with friends and relatives back in Mountain Brook who had by then talked to some of the students/her cousins/close friends.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: inspector_detector on June 26, 2005, 01:15:41 AM
Quote from: "Ladyhawke112"
Quote from: "arubagirl"
Well, somebody told Beth Twitty that she were leaving with Joran, or did the Alabama group just go to the van der Sloots because NH and Joran were talking in the casino?


arubagirl, in probably watching way to much FoxNews, I think it was repoted that the VDS' were disclosed to the Twittys by a bartender (or other worker) at C&C's.


Beth Twitty said she picked out Joran from hotel security tapes.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: OldFart on June 26, 2005, 01:16:20 AM
Quote from: "Sobelle"
Quote from: "OldFart"
Quote from: "arubagirl"
Oldfart, I'm sorry, I'm not following. Out of his way? what way?

There was a time line post (not usere of source) that was
"6:30 am Call to or from Joran’s cellphone in area of Santa Lucia"
Just wondering where that was?
thnks



Here's a map of Aruba that has sites of interests marked. marked.http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/Images-Fun/map3.pdf


Sobelle,
thank you


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Selena on June 26, 2005, 01:18:33 AM
the very first post on this topic at visitaruba.com bb stated she left with a drug dealer, it was by a mother from the group, they knew on the 31st that she left with someone that they were concerned about. the topic thread was HELP. How to contact police!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: TTownMike on June 26, 2005, 01:18:40 AM
Quote from: "puggywug"
Quote from: "TTownMike"
Quote from: "puggywug"
Quote from: "Ladyhawke112"
...watching the performance start about 8pm and waking up in my bad about 7am - with no knowledge of how I got there - or why I wasn't in my normal nightgown...My husband says that I responded almost coherently to conversation, but I have no memory of doing so. At the end of the performance - he walked me to the car - again an act I do not remember.  He told me later that at one point I said, "I am so glad I'm with you." Again, no memory...Anyway  - based on what my husband told me, I was able to walk whilst drugged - so if this happened to Natalee, she might not have needed to be carried.

Considering the theory Natalee was drugged, if she had a reaction similar to yours, she could have been under the influence of it as she was leaving the bar and her friends would not have noticed anything amiss in her behavior.  It could be she was already under the influence of a drug like that when she got in the car with Joran.

Thats hittin the nail on the head, Pug"!

HEY, TT!  I've missed you lately.  Guess we've been on at different times.  :D


Hey puggy'!  Thanks fer dat!  I been in an out, mostly out!  Seems the more I'm away the more the discussion seems to digress!  I been spendin time wiff women, but Im here ta tellya, EVER ONE OF EM GOT BACK SAFE! KwnowwhutImean?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: inspector_detector on June 26, 2005, 01:18:46 AM
Quote from: "TTownMike"
Quote from: "absolut"
Quote from: "DT"
Quote from: "absolut"
You know if you discount all of the lies, retractions, disagreeing statements, and things never released in the investigation, you have a very simple answer to all this.


Which is?


Boy meets girl, girl meets boy (not to mince words)
Girl with friends sees boy again, friends leave
Girl leaves with boy (no assumtions)
Girl and boy get in vechicle
Vechicle drives off into the night.
Boy alive and well, as well as 2 others in the car (remember no statements are any good.)

Girl is missing and no one can tell us, how, why, when where. You have one thing left guilt.

Without statements for or against where does the guilt logically fall.


Absoulutely, absolut! In a nutshell, thats exactly what we've got and where we are!  The only questions after that are really who did how much bad and who did more or less is a crime!

 Well put!


And that's exactly why the Kalpoes would change the story to cover for Joran. They all know he's gonna get the blame. Its just like the security guard that found the bomb at the olympics, he was blamed for planting it.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Whitney on June 26, 2005, 01:18:58 AM
Quote from: "Scott"
Does anyone know when Joran's birthday is?

My understanding is that no one has yet been formally arraigned.

If Joran were to turn 18 before he is charged with murder, could he then be tried as an adult?



Think I've heard he's a Leo...that'd be ...how knows...it has august in it...give you a clue?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: absolut on June 26, 2005, 01:19:02 AM
Night all, try and behave, the monkey always knows.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: KKM on June 26, 2005, 01:19:14 AM
Quote
They did also go the CnCs. But I'm also sure they were on the phone with friends and relatives back in Mountain Brook who had by then talked to some of the students/her cousins/close friends.
That makes perfect sense.  I know you've all seen Marcia Twitty on tv (Jug's brother's wife and the twin boys' mom).  All Beth had to do was talk to Marcia - I am sure she's perfectly capable of getting information from those on the trip and passing it on to Beth.  There you have it - Beth didn't really NEED to talk to the kids, Marcia, Thomas and Hunter could have taken care of that for her.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: coco on June 26, 2005, 01:19:28 AM
absolut I would really like to hear more about your expectation for midnight that didn't happen - you had some info on the search which sounded interesting?

(that said, I need to head to bed - just saw the time and I have  to drive my dtr to work at 7AM tomorrow so I can have the car ...argh!) I'll catch up in the morning.

g'nite all ... and DT - thanks for the discussion - I appreciate the exchange.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: arubagirl on June 26, 2005, 01:19:48 AM
Whitney, per another poster he can be tried as an adult.

And with that I'm going to bed.

Good night all.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: CancunMole on June 26, 2005, 01:20:02 AM
Quote from: "Charlotte"
Quote from: "CancunMole"
Quote from: "Charlotte"
I'm sure Beth Twitty has spoken with kids on the trip.  The article in the July 4 issue of People magazine mentions that Jug spoke with Natalee's cousins Thomas and Hunter Twitty who were on the trip and learned that Thomas has played poker with Joran that same night.


Really, and who won?


Don't know


Don't you wonder? Did someone get their arse beat? Who was involved in the "scuffle"? Where was the "scuffle"? What was the "scuffle" about? We're talking peoples lives here, too many questions for this mother. If it were my kid being blamed, I'd be asking questions.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Ladyhawke112 on June 26, 2005, 01:20:10 AM
Quote from: "arubagirl"
Thanks, Ladyhawke. If that's the case then that would also imply that Joran was a regular C&C customer.


It sure would imply that. And to my mind, if you were about to commit a premeditated crime, you probably wouldn't begin at a place that knows you as a regular.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Shellbell on June 26, 2005, 01:20:41 AM
Have I missed any rumors, breaking news, etc.................


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: TTownMike on June 26, 2005, 01:21:28 AM
Quote from: "arubagirl"
Well, somebody told Beth Twitty that she were leaving with Joran, or did the Alabama group just go to the van der Sloots because NH and Joran were talking in the casino?


Aruba, Im sprised you hafta ask.  She was seen walkin out with Urine!  In a sec she wuz gone!  Beth et als asked questerns and got a name then bartender said "ask cabi" to find out where Urine lived so there they went!

Get it?


Title: JORAN's B DAY
Post by: Selena on June 26, 2005, 01:21:29 AM
Jorans official Bday August 6. 86. according to a cache of a sports roster for school it's June 8th,..take your pic


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: iquitos on June 26, 2005, 01:21:49 AM
Quote from: "writenow"
Quote from: "Selena"
I am shorter and weigh less than Nat, but I tell you what, after 5 vodka drinks they'd be carrying me to a cab.


And the fact that they weren't carrying her shows she didn't drink 5 vodkas.


 that would depend on several factors, including her prior drinking habits, what she had in her stomach, etc. we all know them


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: KerinTX on June 26, 2005, 01:22:43 AM
Quote from: "absolut"
Night all, try and behave, the monkey always knows.


Good night, Absolut


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: KerinTX on June 26, 2005, 01:24:04 AM
Hi Shell....you knew about the hearing being delayed right?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: iquitos on June 26, 2005, 01:24:22 AM
Quote from: "Shellbell"
Have I missed any rumors, breaking news, etc.................
 no news, hearing postponed until tomorrow 8 am.  geraldo was on with little new.  Mr. Twitty thinks Anita should be questioned as a witness.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: columbo on June 26, 2005, 01:25:33 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
>>Hi, LUNA. As you can see, I'm Puggywug. I post this alot when there are questions about Natalee getting in the car. Here is a quote from Dash's mom who also posts here:

"My daughter spoke with Natalee right after C&C's closed. My daughter & her friends came across Nat & Joran as all were exiting the club, and all were walking more or less together toward another group of classmates...

Natalee was walking unassisted (not falling down drunk), spoke ok (though not answering in long sentences), and was not touching Joran.

Nat assured them that she was fine, and said she was going to go back to the hotel "with THEM," pointing to the MBHS group just a few yards ahead. The Kalpoes were nowhere in sight; neither was the car.

Next {woman’s daughter} heard was that Natalee got into a car that many in the group had thought was a taxi. (Those look like regular cars.) It may be that the Kalpoes pulled up on the street before Natalee reached the next group; Joran may have deliberately stalled her. The group may not have even realized she was behind them, approaching.

But while we hear that she got in the car willingly, we know from her comments that it was not her pre-planned intention. Because of this, I do not believe she knew she would be going anywhere but a fairly short distance down to the hotel. Her plans changed in the blink of an eye, and she was gone . . .“
 
http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/Discussion/viewtopic.php?t=303&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=400<<

Well, I really can't help how odd anybody finds this but it has been explained over and over and even on this forum.  And NH has been called some very vile names by the Joren fan club because she got into this car but the poster just a few pages back stated that under the influence of a date rape drug that she walked/talked fairly normally.  While some may not like this version, it is the closest thing we have to what actually happened, an eyewitness account from somebody who spoke to her just an instant before they were loading into the car.

Sure looks like to me she did not even intend to go with Joren.  And there was a link yesterday to an article on the Dark Side about the practice called carving out where males surround the female victim to separate her from her group which it seems is sadly a common practice in the region.  Block her from their view and they from hers and just sort of jostle her along to the waiting car or whatever.

I can't believe everybody missed this post.  And I sometimes wonder why the same questions are asked over and over and over, even on the same day.  Sure, we all miss a bunch of posts but it just seems so odd to come here day after day and the same questions being asked yet again.  Sometimes by the same people.

What's up with that? :?:


What's up with that? This account is being posted on a message board rather than the news. I know the kids said they believed Nat was leaving with the next group, but we have no idea if Nat thought she was getting into a cab. This is why we need more eyewitness statements from the kids who were on the trip. But, aside from the few who have come foward on O'Reilly and Van Susteran, we have nothing else to go on. If the students (or parents of students) want to tell their story, then why not speak to the media? Why would this mother tell her story to Scared Monkey's and not CNN, FOX or any other news org. ??


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: KerinTX on June 26, 2005, 01:25:47 AM
Quote from: "iquitos"
Quote from: "Shellbell"
Have I missed any rumors, breaking news, etc.................
 no news, hearing postponed until tomorrow 8 am.  geraldo was on with little new.  Mr. Twitty thinks Anita should be questioned as a witness.


I know you probably commented and I missed it but do you think Mrs VDS should be questioned, Iquitos?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Shellbell on June 26, 2005, 01:25:57 AM
Hugs Kerin!!!!!!!!!  Yeah I was glued to the tv at 3.  I hope I can wait up at 8.  Anita?  Why?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: nikkibnurse on June 26, 2005, 01:26:15 AM
ok, its late and I am just gonna be a dumba** and ask this b/c sometimes ya'lls abbreviations throw me off..justtrying to catch up here with the posts..what is an MSM? <hanging head in embarrassment because i know it will be obvious when i hear it>


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Scott on June 26, 2005, 01:26:36 AM
Quote from: "Ladyhawke112"
 
And to my mind, if you were about to commit a premeditated crime, you probably wouldn't begin at a place that knows you as a regular.


Why not?  The premeditated crime would be the rape of an American girl on her last night in Aruba; certainly not someone who'd be a regular CnC's customer.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: puggywug on June 26, 2005, 01:26:55 AM
Quote from: "TTownMike"
KwnowwhutImean?

I wouldn't have doubted that!  :wink:


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Red on June 26, 2005, 01:27:58 AM
Quote from: "writenow"
Quote from: "CancunMole"
I am convinced that the "young adults", not "kids" who have appeared on National TV have a prepared "script". Therefore, therefore there should be the number of inconsistnecises we heard.


Apparently you haven't met our little Dash.

No scripts, Cancun. You're reaching here.


What many of you may not be understanding is that the AL teens that went on TV did not have scripts. Actually just the opposite that I would defer to arlee to explain if she wishes. It has been researched and backed up by calls that I have made.

Maybe the teens that everyone wants to hear from would go on the MSM shows if they were treated with respect and told the truth. These teens committed no crime yet they are sometimes given a harder time than they actual suspects in this case.

Do not confuse nervousness and bewilderment with inconsistencies.


Title: 3 pieces
Post by: dl3fan on June 26, 2005, 01:28:08 AM
Was anyone ever able to come up with any good thoughts/ideas about what some/all of the 3 missing pieces of puzzle might be, as stated byaruban authorties?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: KerinTX on June 26, 2005, 01:29:30 AM
sorry Shell..disregard that PM


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Sobelle on June 26, 2005, 01:29:30 AM
Quote from: "nikkibnurse"
ok, its late and I am just gonna be a dumba** and ask this b/c sometimes ya'lls abbreviations throw me off..justtrying to catch up here with the posts..what is an MSM? <hanging head in embarrassment because i know it will be obvious when i hear it>


I just recently read what MSM cause I was in the dark too about the term...Main Stream Media


Title: Re: JORAN's B DAY
Post by: Scott on June 26, 2005, 01:29:47 AM
Quote from: "Selena"
Jorans official Bday August 6. 86. according to a cache of a sports roster for school it's June 8th,..take your pic


That can't be right.  If he was born August 6, 1986, that would make him 18 going on 19.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: DT on June 26, 2005, 01:29:51 AM
Quote from: "columbo"
Quote from: "Anna"
>>Hi, LUNA. As you can see, I'm Puggywug. I post this alot when there are questions about Natalee getting in the car. Here is a quote from Dash's mom who also posts here:

"My daughter spoke with Natalee right after C&C's closed. My daughter & her friends came across Nat & Joran as all were exiting the club, and all were walking more or less together toward another group of classmates...

Natalee was walking unassisted (not falling down drunk), spoke ok (though not answering in long sentences), and was not touching Joran.

Nat assured them that she was fine, and said she was going to go back to the hotel "with THEM," pointing to the MBHS group just a few yards ahead. The Kalpoes were nowhere in sight; neither was the car.

Next {woman’s daughter} heard was that Natalee got into a car that many in the group had thought was a taxi. (Those look like regular cars.) It may be that the Kalpoes pulled up on the street before Natalee reached the next group; Joran may have deliberately stalled her. The group may not have even realized she was behind them, approaching.

But while we hear that she got in the car willingly, we know from her comments that it was not her pre-planned intention. Because of this, I do not believe she knew she would be going anywhere but a fairly short distance down to the hotel. Her plans changed in the blink of an eye, and she was gone . . .“
 
http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/Discussion/viewtopic.php?t=303&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=400<<

Well, I really can't help how odd anybody finds this but it has been explained over and over and even on this forum.  And NH has been called some very vile names by the Joren fan club because she got into this car but the poster just a few pages back stated that under the influence of a date rape drug that she walked/talked fairly normally.  While some may not like this version, it is the closest thing we have to what actually happened, an eyewitness account from somebody who spoke to her just an instant before they were loading into the car.

Sure looks like to me she did not even intend to go with Joren.  And there was a link yesterday to an article on the Dark Side about the practice called carving out where males surround the female victim to separate her from her group which it seems is sadly a common practice in the region.  Block her from their view and they from hers and just sort of jostle her along to the waiting car or whatever.

I can't believe everybody missed this post.  And I sometimes wonder why the same questions are asked over and over and over, even on the same day.  Sure, we all miss a bunch of posts but it just seems so odd to come here day after day and the same questions being asked yet again.  Sometimes by the same people.

What's up with that? :?:


What's up with that? This account is being posted on a message board rather than the news. I know the kids said they believed Nat was leaving with the next group, but we have no idea if Nat thought she was getting into a cab. This is why we need more eyewitness statements from the kids who were on the trip. But, aside from the few who have come foward on O'Reilly and Van Susteran, we have nothing else to go on. If the students (or parents of students) want to tell their story, then why not speak to the media? Why would this mother tell her story to Scared Monkey's and not CNN, FOX or any other news org. ??


Because the media might spin their story, whereas they could tell their own story exactly as they want it to be heard on the internet w/o the risk of people taking what they say the wrong way.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Whitney on June 26, 2005, 01:31:10 AM
Quote from: "arubagirl"
Daniel, for real? Wow, didn't know that.

Kipster, urm, it's a backyard. To take a picture I would have to go the back of the house. I'm pretty sure that the walls are high, and my camera can't take pictures through walls, so that's not going to happen. If you have/watch the film clips...the dogs are happy!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Anna on June 26, 2005, 01:31:28 AM
It has been pointed out repeatedly that her twin cousins were gambling with Joren in the casino earlier in the week.  No one ever said NH herself gambled and she may have been there just watching her cousins.  She probably saw Joren while there, however.   The friend who was there with her on Sunday said NH introduced herself to Joren which would indicate to me at least that this is when she met him.  Otherwise, her memory would be in pretty bad shape for one so young, wouldn't it?  Why would she introduce herself is she already knew him?  But he was a familiar face from hanging around the hotel casino so much.  But she introduced herself to him on Sunday according to the friend who was with her.  The same day she disappeared, although she had seen him around before that.

As for the oddity of BethH finding Joren so fast, I guess that is a shock to any who might see tourists as just a commodity with no family or roots or as being real people.  So many from Aruba seemed surprised to find the girl actually had concerned parents!  What is that about?  Did Joren think of tourists in this way?  Bet he was most surprised of all, if he did.

Some of the students who had stayed behind, maybe these same twins, identified Joren on the casino tape, locals provided his name from same.  Beth looked in the phone book and found the address for the residence from his name.  Apparently, there are not a lot of Van de Sloots listed and if they knew Joren's name at the casino, maybe they knew the father as well.  The chaparone had contacted the DEA agent while they were in flight.  The Senator contacted the FBI and I do believe a senator can locate an FBI agent even on a holiday would be my guess.  

It pays to have friends.  They can help and do things like this in a time of emergency.   :wink:


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: pybird on June 26, 2005, 01:31:42 AM
Quote from: "CancunMole"
Quote from: "Charlotte"
Quote from: "CancunMole"
Quote from: "Charlotte"
I'm sure Beth Twitty has spoken with kids on the trip.  The article in the July 4 issue of People magazine mentions that Jug spoke with Natalee's cousins Thomas and Hunter Twitty who were on the trip and learned that Thomas has played poker with Joran that same night.


Really, and who won?


Don't know


Don't you wonder? Did someone get their arse beat? Who was involved in the "scuffle"? Where was the "scuffle"? What was the "scuffle" about? We're talking peoples lives here, too many questions for this mother. If it were my kid being blamed, I'd be asking questions.


I can post what the National Enquirer printed 1 week ago if you are interested.  I know it's a tabloid, please don't flame.  It does give a bit of a different spin than we've heard before.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: puggywug on June 26, 2005, 01:31:57 AM
Quote from: "columbo"
Quote from: "Anna"
>>Hi, LUNA. As you can see, I'm Puggywug. I post this alot when there are questions about Natalee getting in the car. Here is a quote from Dash's mom who also posts here:
"My daughter spoke with Natalee right after C&C's closed. My daughter & her friends came across Nat & Joran as all were exiting the club, and all were walking more or less together toward another group of classmates...
Natalee was walking unassisted (not falling down drunk), spoke ok (though not answering in long sentences), and was not touching Joran.
Nat assured them that she was fine, and said she was going to go back to the hotel "with THEM," pointing to the MBHS group just a few yards ahead. The Kalpoes were nowhere in sight; neither was the car.
Next {woman’s daughter} heard was that Natalee got into a car that many in the group had thought was a taxi. (Those look like regular cars.) It may be that the Kalpoes pulled up on the street before Natalee reached the next group; Joran may have deliberately stalled her. The group may not have even realized she was behind them, approaching.
But while we hear that she got in the car willingly, we know from her comments that it was not her pre-planned intention. Because of this, I do not believe she knew she would be going anywhere but a fairly short distance down to the hotel. Her plans changed in the blink of an eye, and she was gone . . .“
http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/Discussion/viewtopic.php?t=303&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=400<<
Well, I really can't help how odd anybody finds this but it has been explained over and over and even on this forum.  And NH has been called some very vile names by the Joren fan club because she got into this car but the poster just a few pages back stated that under the influence of a date rape drug that she walked/talked fairly normally.  While some may not like this version, it is the closest thing we have to what actually happened, an eyewitness account from somebody who spoke to her just an instant before they were loading into the car.
Sure looks like to me she did not even intend to go with Joren.  And there was a link yesterday to an article on the Dark Side about the practice called carving out where males surround the female victim to separate her from her group which it seems is sadly a common practice in the region.  Block her from their view and they from hers and just sort of jostle her along to the waiting car or whatever.
I can't believe everybody missed this post.  And I sometimes wonder why the same questions are asked over and over and over, even on the same day.  Sure, we all miss a bunch of posts but it just seems so odd to come here day after day and the same questions being asked yet again.  Sometimes by the same people.
What's up with that? :?:

What's up with that? This account is being posted on a message board rather than the news. I know the kids said they believed Nat was leaving with the next group, but we have no idea if Nat thought she was getting into a cab. This is why we need more eyewitness statements from the kids who were on the trip. But, aside from the few who have come foward on O'Reilly and Van Susteran, we have nothing else to go on. If the students (or parents of students) want to tell their story, then why not speak to the media? Why would this mother tell her story to Scared Monkey's and not CNN, FOX or any other news org. ??

The woman's daughter DID tell her story to the MSM - it was Dash's mother who wrote that post. :D


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Red on June 26, 2005, 01:33:49 AM
Quote from: "absolut"
Night all, try and behave, the monkey always knows.


Night dude ... see you tomorrow ... same monkey time ... same monkey channel


Title: msm
Post by: iquitos on June 26, 2005, 01:34:23 AM
msm=mainstream media


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Whitney on June 26, 2005, 01:34:46 AM
Quote from: "Ladyhawke112"
Quote from: "bobntexas"
Companzi stated:"I think its a bit disgusting to see Jug smile with glee at Paul's arrest. He'll probably be so happy if they charge AVDS as well. "

I suspect Jug was reacting with the manner PVDS obstructed the investigation the first night.


Regarding Jug's description of PVDS' and Deepak's obstruction the first night, in how (I assume) they both were telling JVDS (who Jug says wanted to help) "not to say anything." I personally think that is really why PVDS was arrested. But more curiously to me, how does Jug's description of that night jive with  Beth's, who claimed that JVDS was rude and arrogant to her?


Good Questions...we don't know because there's never been that viz a vie in USA/cabel/MSM TV/interview/press...

You get that one...then you've a SCOOOP
, as they used to call it... [/b]


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: writenow on June 26, 2005, 01:34:59 AM
Quote from: "arubagirl"
Whitney, per another poster he can be tried as an adult.

And with that I'm going to bed.

Good night all.


Nite arubagirl! Thanks for hanging with us!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Red on June 26, 2005, 01:35:54 AM
Aruba girl & coco - night


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: KerinTX on June 26, 2005, 01:36:20 AM
Night Arubagirl! Still hoping for that Monkey "shout out" from you on TV tomorrow!  :D


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Lausa on June 26, 2005, 01:36:34 AM
Quote from: "coco"
Jug makes me crazy - just a personal aversion to a certain style of man ... I'd take a David Holloway any day of the week!
 He's more my type too.   Interesting entries on http://www.al.com/forums/mountainbrook/ (Yes, The Tiny Kingdom has it's own forum!) I'm reading these statements about the Holloway/Twitty family dynamic which are to be taken as unproved gossip:
1.  "I think they don't like each at all, not even in a time of crisis. I heard that the mom wouldnt even allow the dad to ride on the private plane with them to Aruba. She said the plane was full with some of her friends."
2."It's more than clear that the Holloway's don't like the natural father.  After being notified that Natalee was missing Beth Holloway left for Aruba and didn't notify Natalee's father (per his first interview on Fox News). He found out through the son and then made arrangements on his own...I noticed that the step-mother spoke of Beth and acknowledged her as the mother, sympathy for the grief she's going through...For the record, I think that Beth has behaved in an exemplary fashion (except that she pretends that Natalee's biological father doesn't exist and I'm not the only one who has noticed that.)"
Beth and Jug are definitely Type A personalities. From descriptions of Natalee, she sounds like she might be a lot like Mr. Holloway.  When you look at the Graduation pics of Natalee with either her Mother or her Father, it's obvious there's much love all the way around.   Maybe the lawyer they hired to help work with the Aruban LE also helps facilitate communications between the two ex's!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: TTownMike on June 26, 2005, 01:36:59 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
>>Hi, LUNA. As you can see, I'm Puggywug. I post this alot when there are questions about Natalee getting in the car. Here is a quote from Dash's mom who also posts here:

"My daughter spoke with Natalee right after C&C's closed. My daughter & her friends came across Nat & Joran as all were exiting the club, and all were walking more or less together toward another group of classmates...

Natalee was walking unassisted (not falling down drunk), spoke ok (though not answering in long sentences), and was not touching Joran.

Nat assured them that she was fine, and said she was going to go back to the hotel "with THEM," pointing to the MBHS group just a few yards ahead. The Kalpoes were nowhere in sight; neither was the car.

Next {woman’s daughter} heard was that Natalee got into a car that many in the group had thought was a taxi. (Those look like regular cars.) It may be that the Kalpoes pulled up on the street before Natalee reached the next group; Joran may have deliberately stalled her. The group may not have even realized she was behind them, approaching.

But while we hear that she got in the car willingly, we know from her comments that it was not her pre-planned intention. Because of this, I do not believe she knew she would be going anywhere but a fairly short distance down to the hotel. Her plans changed in the blink of an eye, and she was gone . . .“
 
http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/Discussion/viewtopic.php?t=303&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=400<<

Well, I really can't help how odd anybody finds this but it has been explained over and over and even on this forum.  And NH has been called some very vile names by the Joren fan club because she got into this car but the poster just a few pages back stated that under the influence of a date rape drug that she walked/talked fairly normally.  While some may not like this version, it is the closest thing we have to what actually happened, an eyewitness account from somebody who spoke to her just an instant before they were loading into the car.

Sure looks like to me she did not even intend to go with Joren.  And there was a link yesterday to an article on the Dark Side about the practice called carving out where males surround the female victim to separate her from her group which it seems is sadly a common practice in the region.  Block her from their view and they from hers and just sort of jostle her along to the waiting car or whatever.

I can't believe everybody missed this post.  And I sometimes wonder why the same questions are asked over and over and over, even on the same day.  Sure, we all miss a bunch of posts but it just seems so odd to come here day after day and the same questions being asked yet again.  Sometimes by the same people.

What's up with that? :?:


WAY TA GO ANNA! That is an excellent post!  Some folks, when they "put themselves in her shoes" tend to think of the worst,(reckless behavior leaving your friends) and some "when they put themselves in her shoes" realize that they would not have willingly done so.(gotten into a situation)  This shows us insite into those two personal viewpoints which tells of how THEY ARE moreso than HOW NAT IS!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: CancunMole on June 26, 2005, 01:37:22 AM
Quote from: "arubagirl"
Well, somebody told Beth Twitty that she were leaving with Joran, or did the Alabama group just go to the van der Sloots because NH and Joran were talking in the casino?


Or, could it have been because Joran beat the pants off some people at cards in the casino and NH introduced herself to him at some point and indicated an interest? I'd like to know when NH really met Joran? Is it per Ed who had seen him with NH and her friends or per others, or on video? If this were my son. I'd have someone in ALA asking questions,,,,,,,,,,,,,,


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: tkubi7 on June 26, 2005, 01:37:27 AM
Quote from: "Ladyhawke112"
Quote from: "arubagirl"
Thanks, Ladyhawke. If that's the case then that would also imply that Joran was a regular C&C customer.


It sure would imply that. And to my mind, if you were about to commit a premeditated crime, you probably wouldn't begin at a place that knows you as a regular.


unless of course other people there were in on it. As I stated before, If Joran was a regular, he probably was friends with the bartenders and dj's. Could this be where he met steven croes?  Having been there myself (CnC's), I've seen the bartenders literally tip the heads back on women and pour drinks down their throats. Who's to say the bartender didn't do that with something in the drink? I think if I wanted to get a drug into someone, that is exactly the place to be, surrounded by my friends who could help me and would never rat on me. Just my opinion


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Whitney on June 26, 2005, 01:37:32 AM
Quote from: "sb"
Jug and Beth Twitty are the kind of people who're determined to find their daughter and they really don't care too much what anyone thinks of why or how they go about it! They are VICTIMS and they don't need all the finger-pointing at them right now. They are more worried about RESULTS than IMAGE.


I'll stipulate to that; but we are seeing what we is known as <snip> cuts;

I have to admit, anyway.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Ladyhawke112 on June 26, 2005, 01:38:22 AM
Quote from: "Scott"
Quote from: "Ladyhawke112"
 
And to my mind, if you were about to commit a premeditated crime, you probably wouldn't begin at a place that knows you as a regular.


Why not?  The premeditated crime would be the rape of an American girl on her last night in Aruba; certainly not someone who'd be a regular CnC's customer.


Scott, He may very well have comitted the crime, no one knows. I just think (my own opinion) when he went to C&C's to meet her, committing a crime was probably not on his mind. If he regularly does these heinous acts, as a regular, with all this worldwide publicity, wouldn't another victim have come forward by now?

I'm not saying he was not involved - no one knows - and he most likely knows more than we have been told - I just think (whatever that is worth) that is was not planned before the meeting at C&cC's.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: writenow on June 26, 2005, 01:38:33 AM
Quote from: "pybird"
I can post what the National Enquirer printed 1 week ago if you are interested.  I know it's a tabloid, please don't flame.  It does give a bit of a different spin than we've heard before.


What does it say? And do they have actual facts or are they quoting aliens and psychics?


Title: Re: JORAN's B DAY
Post by: Itawamba on June 26, 2005, 01:39:02 AM
Quote from: "Selena"
Jorans official Bday August 6. 86. according to a cache of a sports roster for school it's June 8th,..take your pic


Most I've seen have said August 6, 1987.  I think the other incongruity is the Euro way of writing dates -- 8-6-87 transposed would be 6-8-87.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Sobelle on June 26, 2005, 01:39:49 AM
Quote from: "pybird"
Quote from: "CancunMole"
Quote from: "Charlotte"
Quote from: "CancunMole"
Quote from: "Charlotte"
I'm sure Beth Twitty has spoken with kids on the trip.  The article in the July 4 issue of People magazine mentions that Jug spoke with Natalee's cousins Thomas and Hunter Twitty who were on the trip and learned that Thomas has played poker with Joran that same night.


Really, and who won?


Don't know


Don't you wonder? Did someone get their arse beat? Who was involved in the "scuffle"? Where was the "scuffle"? What was the "scuffle" about? We're talking peoples lives here, too many questions for this mother. If it were my kid being blamed, I'd be asking questions.


I can post what the National Enquirer printed 1 week ago if you are interested.  I know it's a tabloid, please don't flame.  It does give a bit of a different spin than we've heard before.


Post away!  My mind is wandering all over the place about all of this and I'm reading most everything I can  No flaming from me at all.  Thanks


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: pybird on June 26, 2005, 01:41:08 AM
Quote from: "writenow"
Quote from: "pybird"
I can post what the National Enquirer printed 1 week ago if you are interested.  I know it's a tabloid, please don't flame.  It does give a bit of a different spin than we've heard before.


What does it say? And do they have actual facts or are they quoting aliens and psychics?


Hang on, let me get it.  I'll just post a snippet regarding the scuffle.  BRB


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: KerinTX on June 26, 2005, 01:41:44 AM
Personally I would rank National Enquirer right in with Geraldo but hey, it 's all good!  :D


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: columbo on June 26, 2005, 01:42:08 AM
The woman's daughter DID tell her story to the MSM - it was Dash's mother who wrote that post.

Ok, sorry....I don't know who Dash is. My point is we have no idea if Natalee thought she was getting into a cab or her friends assumed she was getting into a cab. For all we know, Nat was comfortable enough with Joran to leave with him, or maybe not. If we had more statements from Nat's friends her name/reputation would not be in question. It seems like the MB folks are getting upset by what they're reading here, but we don't have enough information from the other students/friends to discount the rumors and speculations.

Thanks for calling me on my error though, Puggy. :) I love to be proven wrong.  :x  :)  8)


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Red on June 26, 2005, 01:44:24 AM
columbo

Quote
But, aside from the few who have come foward on O'Reilly and Van Susteran, we have nothing else to go on. If the students (or parents of students) want to tell their story, then why not speak to the media? Why would this mother tell her story to Scared Monkey's and not CNN, FOX or any other news org. ??


Wow, I almost take offense to that comment.  :shock:

Here might be your answer. Maybe just maybe, Scared Monkeys has acted with more professionalism, courtesy and honesty with the MB teens and their parents than the MSM?

Trust me when I say this, I have said to more than 1 MSM producer this past week that they better start doing right by these kids. All remember, this is not like interviewing an adult. Like it or not they are teens and the same sleazy MSM rules do not apply.

Why would they come on here huh and say it. Thanks a lot.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: puggywug on June 26, 2005, 01:44:50 AM
Quote from: "Ladyhawke112"
Quote from: "Scott"
Quote from: "Ladyhawke112"
 
And to my mind, if you were about to commit a premeditated crime, you probably wouldn't begin at a place that knows you as a regular.

Why not?  The premeditated crime would be the rape of an American girl on her last night in Aruba; certainly not someone who'd be a regular CnC's customer.

Scott, He may very well have comitted the crime, no one knows. I just think (my own opinion) when he went to C&C's to meet her, committing a crime was probably not on his mind. If he regularly does these heinous acts, as a regular, with all this worldwide publicity, wouldn't another victim have come forward by now?
I'm not saying he was not involved - no one knows - and he most likely knows more than we have been told - I just think (whatever that is worth) that is was not planned before the meeting at C&cC's.

Maybe other victims have come forward.  We won't know until trial because under Dutch law, anything discussed in the media is inadmissable in court proceedings.

Also, sexually assaulting women on their last night of vacation is actually a scheme that is well-known in some places.  The women are too humiliated to postpone their return to their home, so they usually don't press charges or tell anyone about it.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: GreatOwl on June 26, 2005, 01:45:18 AM
http://www.nationalenquirer.com/crime/


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: TTownMike on June 26, 2005, 01:46:02 AM
Quote from: "DT"
Quote from: "coco"
DT - I think part of the questioning is that it's really rare to see a public case like this that is so completely controlled in terms of media coverage and image. Just thinking in comparison to say the Elizabeth Smart case where there were all sorts of runours and innuendoes and such - not condoning those but that's how the media operates and we don't see it here.

I also don't think it's that people find it hard to believe that there are good kids - I sure do believe there are good kids but I know that they are not perfect and more multidimensional than that - couple this with the image of "good kids with good morals" who go to Aruba for open bar all inclusive, casinos and Carlos and Charlie's at night ... it's an interesting picture of what our culture not considers "good."

And I think that that is part of what stirs interest in the case - we're seeing an image of acceptable or even "good" young adult behavior that is very different from the definition that many of us grew up with. This is not ... NOT ... blaming Natalee or the parents or anything like that - it's about Natalee as a symbol for a shift in our culture and how we react. These discussions are probably not meant for folks who are close to the situation itself - for you all, it's personal and about someone you know. But online, in a blog, etc it becomes also about ideas and broader cultural implications. One thing I value here is that I don't think anyone, no matter what their theory of the case, forgets that at the core is the disappearance of a lovely young woman who did not deserve whatever has happened to her - and I think we all ache for her and her family.

But you're missing the point no one is claiming anyone is perfect.  They're claiming she was a very good person with good morals.  Nothing we know yet contradicts that. We don't know how much she drank or even if she gambled.  I wouldn't be surprised if she did both of these things.  But I think that is entirely consistent with a person who has good morals.


DT, agreed!  No real evidense of any negative characteristics in Natalee! (Though some seem relentless in efforts to undermine her character)!

At the same time, Urine was seemingly "good kid"!  Im sure he has "charm" (see links around here to "psychopath") which if ya thank about it contributes to NAt being sucked in!  
And too, I see that no one seems to say that urine has done this before.  (But who knows how close he may have come with other TARGETS?)


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: DT on June 26, 2005, 01:46:36 AM
Quote from: "columbo"
The woman's daughter DID tell her story to the MSM - it was Dash's mother who wrote that post.

Ok, sorry....I don't know who Dash is. My point is we have no idea if Natalee thought she was getting into a cab or her friends assumed she was getting into a cab. For all we know, Nat was comfortable enough with Joran to leave with him, or maybe not. If we had more statements from Nat's friends her name/reputation would not be in question. It seems like the MB folks are getting upset by what they're reading here, but we don't have enough information from the other students/friends to discount the rumors and speculations.

Thanks for calling me on my error though, Puggy. :) I love to be proven wrong.  :x  :)  8)



What more do you need?  Everyone I've heard talk about her who knew her said she was a good person.  Not a single person has brought forward any charges against her character.  Im not saying she was perfect, but her character as we hear it from her friends/family was better than the sort of accusations I keep hearing repeated.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Anna on June 26, 2005, 01:47:00 AM
Columbo--

I do not know yet how to post a quote but think they waste too much space anyway.  What few kids have granted interviews have had them twisted and have been misquoted.  They are just kids and are not accustomed to being interrogated or made to feel that they did something wrong as has happened in other interviews.  They have been harshly asked why they did not look out for their friend and things like that.  They had no idea what was going to happen.  If you were 17-18 and on national media with someone badgering you as to why you did not look out for a member of your group, what exactly would you say?

Interesting that some want the kids grilled far more than the suspects.  And no, these are not stepford kids and not perfect but the sure do not go out drinking and gambling every night, either.  Just not done in this part of the country.

They are also from very privileged families, some of the most privileged in the country, some of them.  They have condos on the beach, most all homes have nice swimming pools, many private planes, etc.  Joren would not be in their league in this country.  I seriously doubt NH was very impressed with him at all, contrary to what some think.  He was younger than her for one thing and she was a very mature girl for her age.  I think she tried to be friendly and this is where it got her.  And Boyz2Men is no biggie here, either.  Doubt she would even bother to attend if they were in B'ham.  My kids wouldn't for sure.  Most of those kids also spent the entire days on the beach.  They were not some desperate gang out for any and every thrill.  I know dozens of kids just like them who do not have to have the wild stuff to have a good life.  And I don't believe any bartender can remember the exact number of drinks served to every customer like that, either.  

So as I asked before, why trash the MB kids, the victim or her family?  I believe if there were any dirt it would have come out long before now and most of what I have seen is just pure fabrication of dirt/suspicion where none exists.  Believe it or not, lots of families do not have deep dark evil secrets but even if they did, so what?  Does that mean their daughter should be made to disappear and likely killed in some horrific manner?  What am I missing here?   :shock:


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Whitney on June 26, 2005, 01:47:17 AM
Quote from: "arlee"
goon squad wrote:
 
"<<Or, in other words... who MISLEAD the investigation since the beginning.>>

Yeah, like no searches tied to JVDS and the Kalpoes for a week and a half... totally Jug's call!"

What?  I don't understand what you're saying...?


A geat "post" to jump ahead on!...as the arlee states: (impliedly: 'why not? '....)... ...any reasonable 'thread person' would know arlee is to read in that regard....

However...I gave the reference last night...: If you were imprisoned bull of your faculties (and fully innocent of any crime...at least that you knew of;)  how long would you last?  

Let's bet!...and that's the sinister sort of line that, IMHO, this story line should begin upon...


Title: DEA Agent
Post by: Itawamba on June 26, 2005, 01:47:57 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
The chaparone had contacted the DEA agent while they were in flight.


The DEA agent just happened to already be at the Holiday Inn on some other assignment and heard the commotion between the chaperone and others in the lobby, then offered his assistance.  That's how that part happened.


Title: scuffle
Post by: iquitos on June 26, 2005, 01:47:58 AM
http://www.picayuneitem.com/articles/2005/06/22/news/11friends.txt


Title: Re: JORAN's B DAY
Post by: writenow on June 26, 2005, 01:48:06 AM
Quote from: "Scott"
Quote from: "Selena"
Jorans official Bday August 6. 86. according to a cache of a sports roster for school it's June 8th,..take your pic


That can't be right.  If he was born August 6, 1986, that would make him 18 going on 19.


Aruban LE said Aug. 6, 1987 (and spelled out August). Maybe they're wrong. Which could explain a lot in this investigation.

Or it could have been written the european way 6/8/87 (they put day month year instead of american way of month day year) and someone got confused. But they've been identifying him as still 17, so i don't think his 18th b-day has occured yet.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: GuyWdog on June 26, 2005, 01:49:15 AM
It's amazing the Enquierer can pst stuff like that and get away with it. Soounds like the Arubaian Police just need to contac the Enquiere..LoL..thanx for the link...

GuyWdog


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Rosalie on June 26, 2005, 01:50:11 AM
Quote from: "KKM"
Quote from: "mia"
Quote from: "wantsanswers"
Quote from: "arubagirl"
Compananzi, per this link: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,160385,00.html, her friends say that she first met Joran  on the night of May 29th into May 30th. May 30th is when she was supposed to fly home.


I think those girls were flakes. Dash and others saw them talking on other days.


Why didn't the Aruban police hold all those kids for questioning?  They may have missed something by letting them leave.
I HOPE somebody can go back and look at this interview - it was the remote Greta did (from Aruba) w/ Frances Ellen Byrd and Ruth McVay (from Bham) about when Natalee actually met Joran.

I should have posted this DAYS ago, but didn't realize it would become such a big point of contention.

While watching that particular interview, I remember thinking "Greta, you screwed up asking that question and now you have them all confused."  I think Greta may have stumbled around a bit asking as well.  So, if ANYONE can go back and look at that, let me know what you think.  

I am pretty sure it will show that they were ALL confused and that the question was both asked and answered inconsistently.



When Natalee first went missing people started shifting blame to the adults that went on that trip.
I  HEARD ??  that they, adults, got a lawyer. It could be their lawyer told them and the kids to keep quiet.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: AZLady on June 26, 2005, 01:50:35 AM
We have to trust that the FBI have gleaned all necessary info from the MB kids and have passed it along to the authorities in Aruba.  I have no doubt about this.  I don't need to hear from the MB kids to feel confident in this.  My curiosity and my interest about Natalee might make me want to talk to the MB kids, but I know that it's not a good idea--for the investigation and for the kids.


Title: scuffle # 2
Post by: iquitos on June 26, 2005, 01:50:49 AM
http://www.postherald.com/me061005.shtml


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: GreatOwl on June 26, 2005, 01:51:30 AM
Quote from: "GuyWdog"
It's amazing the Enquierer can pst stuff like that and get away with it. Soounds like the Arubaian Police just need to contac the Enquiere..LoL..thanx for the link...

GuyWdog


your welcome, however, for those not familiar with this publication please read it as a mostly fictional work.  It may still reveal some names we have not seen as of yet.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: CancunMole on June 26, 2005, 01:51:48 AM
Quote from: "wantsanswers"
Quote from: "Whitney"
Quote from: "[b
CancunMole[/b]"]
Quote from: "arubagirl"
If Jug said that, and AvdS is going to be detained, then I guess we know who's running the show.

AvdS wasn't on the island, so she couldn't see/hear anything. And anything that JvdS told her she doesn't have to reveal, so basically, there is no point.


This, I'm sure will not be popular but, my dog wouldn't let Jug in my house with all his vinegar. To me, the way the vdSs' dogs reacted to strangers, told me volumes about them as people who live/brought the dogs up. Barking but tails awagin'.


CancunMole...sort of my point I'll be making...

If you saw the tape with Greta and Beth Holloway/Twitty making that surprise visit to the VDS-household...there was NO BARKING...in fact, there was tail-wagging behaviour by both of the dogs...and I think that voice was Beth HT's voice calling out, initially to the dogs, and then yelling, 'are you home?' to the inhabitants...all the dogs continued to wag their tales...with heads BOWED...


They knew that Beth had authority...there was NO DOUBT.


I think its sad some of you guys are afraid of Jug, a lot of hot air like Trump. I don't really care for that type of attitude, I wouldn't jump down his throat.. That is how they hide their emotions, don't cry or they will think you are weak. Trump says that to everyone.


Please, don't even mention Trump. I'm not afraid of Jug, I think he's an ah. I don't think he helps at all. My dog would not have liked any shrill voice, but I live in the "North".


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Whitney on June 26, 2005, 01:52:12 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
It has been pointed out repeatedly that her twin cousins were gambling with Joren in the casino earlier in the week.  No one ever said NH herself gambled and she may have been there just watching her cousins.  She probably saw Joren while there, however.   The friend who was there with her on Sunday said NH introduced herself to Joren which would indicate to me at least that this is when she met him.  Otherwise, her memory would be in pretty bad shape for one so young, wouldn't it?  Why would she introduce herself is she already knew him?  But he was a familiar face from hanging around the hotel casino so much.  But she introduced herself to him on Sunday according to the friend who was with her.  The same day she disappeared, although she had seen him around before that.

As for the oddity of BethH finding Joren so fast, I guess that is a shock to any who might see tourists as just a commodity with no family or roots or as being real people.  So many from Aruba seemed surprised to find the girl actually had concerned parents!  What is that about?  Did Joren think of tourists in this way?  Bet he was most surprised of all, if he did.

Some of the students who had stayed behind, maybe these same twins, identified Joren on the casino tape, locals provided his name from same.  Beth looked in the phone book and found the address for the residence from his name.  Apparently, there are not a lot of Van de Sloots listed and if they knew Joren's name at the casino, maybe they knew the father as well.  The chaparone had contacted the DEA agent while they were in flight.  The Senator contacted the FBI and I do believe a senator can locate an FBI agent even on a holiday would be my guess.  

It pays to have friends.  They can help and do things like this in a time of emergency.   :wink:


I'd just to prefer to "hang out with Anna"...that's what I'm doing for this moment... :wink:


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: TTownMike on June 26, 2005, 01:52:42 AM
Quote from: "wantsanswers"
Quote from: "Whitney"
Quote from: "[b
CancunMole[/b]"]
Quote from: "arubagirl"
If Jug said that, and AvdS is going to be detained, then I guess we know who's running the show.

AvdS wasn't on the island, so she couldn't see/hear anything. And anything that JvdS told her she doesn't have to reveal, so basically, there is no point.


This, I'm sure will not be popular but, my dog wouldn't let Jug in my house with all his vinegar. To me, the way the vdSs' dogs reacted to strangers, told me volumes about them as people who live/brought the dogs up. Barking but tails awagin'.


CancunMole...sort of my point I'll be making...

If you saw the tape with Greta and Beth Holloway/Twitty making that surprise visit to the VDS-household...there was NO BARKING...in fact, there was tail-wagging behaviour by both of the dogs...and I think that voice was Beth HT's voice calling out, initially to the dogs, and then yelling, 'are you home?' to the inhabitants...all the dogs continued to wag their tales...with heads BOWED...


They knew that Beth had authority...there was NO DOUBT.


I think its sad some of you guys are afraid of Jug, a lot of hot air like Trump. I don't really care for that type of attitude, I wouldn't jump down his throat.. That is how they hide their emotions, don't cry or they will think you are weak. Trump says that to everyone.


If anyone thinks Jug is outta line, FERGITTABOUTIT!
He is only admirable in his desperate search for his girl!  Others who may have found themselves in similar situations I'm sure look aty him with admiration for his strength!  As to he(they)and the media, if they didn't do the interviews where would the case be?  If they hadn't been there asap, where would the investigation be?  (1- lost in obsurity; 2- just another missing person report)  
They are wonderful parents doing all they can and appreciating all the help and support they are gittin!

SOTASPEAK!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: inspector_detector on June 26, 2005, 01:52:55 AM
Quote from: "TTownMike"
Quote from: "DT"
Quote from: "coco"
DT - I think part of the questioning is that it's really rare to see a public case like this that is so completely controlled in terms of media coverage and image. Just thinking in comparison to say the Elizabeth Smart case where there were all sorts of runours and innuendoes and such - not condoning those but that's how the media operates and we don't see it here.

I also don't think it's that people find it hard to believe that there are good kids - I sure do believe there are good kids but I know that they are not perfect and more multidimensional than that - couple this with the image of "good kids with good morals" who go to Aruba for open bar all inclusive, casinos and Carlos and Charlie's at night ... it's an interesting picture of what our culture not considers "good."

And I think that that is part of what stirs interest in the case - we're seeing an image of acceptable or even "good" young adult behavior that is very different from the definition that many of us grew up with. This is not ... NOT ... blaming Natalee or the parents or anything like that - it's about Natalee as a symbol for a shift in our culture and how we react. These discussions are probably not meant for folks who are close to the situation itself - for you all, it's personal and about someone you know. But online, in a blog, etc it becomes also about ideas and broader cultural implications. One thing I value here is that I don't think anyone, no matter what their theory of the case, forgets that at the core is the disappearance of a lovely young woman who did not deserve whatever has happened to her - and I think we all ache for her and her family.

But you're missing the point no one is claiming anyone is perfect.  They're claiming she was a very good person with good morals.  Nothing we know yet contradicts that. We don't know how much she drank or even if she gambled.  I wouldn't be surprised if she did both of these things.  But I think that is entirely consistent with a person who has good morals.


DT, agreed!  No real evidense of any negative characteristics in Natalee! (Though some seem relentless in efforts to undermine her character)!

At the same time, Urine was seemingly "good kid"!  Im sure he has "charm" (she links around her to psychopath) which if ya thank about it contributes to NAt being sucked in!  
And too, I see that no one seems to say that urine ha done this before.  (But who knows how close he may have come with other TARGETS?)


So just keep "Urine" and his dad in prison. And then we'll all be happy right? Since we all know he's guilty of raping and killing Natalee. The Twittys should all be happy and content and can go back home. What more could they have hoped for? :roll:


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: GuyWdog on June 26, 2005, 01:53:14 AM
I talked to a man yesterday that his parents live next to Natalee, the neighbor hood is just in-shock about this whole situation. This man knew of Natalee and he confirms how nice and sweet she IS.

GuyWdog


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: KerinTX on June 26, 2005, 01:53:36 AM
Anna....I was really touched by your post.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Kipster on June 26, 2005, 01:54:23 AM
CM:
>>Or, could it have been because Joran beat the pants off some people at cards in the casino and NH introduced herself to him at some point and indicated an interest?

Right, it was the Depak e-mail that mentioned she gave him some cash to win back for her prior losses right?

a month, a million threads, breaking news flashes, dreams, still hope of seeing her smiling face live, THE reason I'm afraid of having kids...no way I could maintain


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: CancunMole on June 26, 2005, 01:54:38 AM
Quote from: "Ladyhawke112"
Quote from: "arubagirl"
Well, somebody told Beth Twitty that she were leaving with Joran, or did the Alabama group just go to the van der Sloots because NH and Joran were talking in the casino?


arubagirl, in probably watching way to much FoxNews, I think it was reported that the VDS' were disclosed to the Twittys by a bartender (or other worker) at C&C's.


BS. They knew who NH left C&C with before they left ALA.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Scott on June 26, 2005, 01:55:40 AM
Quote from: "Ladyhawke112"

If he regularly does these heinous acts, as a regular, with all this worldwide publicity, wouldn't another victim have come forward by now?


Not if he strictly targeted girls who were already intoxicated, heading back to the States the next day.  A lawyer representing an American girl who was admittedly very drunk would have a rather difficult time getting a rape conviction against Joran in an Aruban court.

If there is any pattern to his behavior, I would also lean to believe that he boasts about his father's standing as a judge on island, thus further intimidating any girl who can't recall exactly what happened the previous night.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: pybird on June 26, 2005, 01:57:42 AM
THE NATIONAL ENQUIRER  6/27/2005

By David Wright in Aruba
and Sharon Ward

****snip*****

The National Enquirer can reveal van der Sloot had an angry pushing match with Natalee's friends just hours before she vanished.  The blow-up occurred on May 29 at Carlos'n'Charlies.  It's a sprawling nightclub and dance club in the resort with booths and several bars that serve yard-high margaritas for $12.  The club, a Mexican theme bar that offers us loud music and South of the Border food, was the place Natalee and her group decided to party before their scheduled flight home the next day.

Bryan Reynolds, 18, one of the 125 Alabama seniors on the Aruba trip, recalled that van der Sloot was chatting with Natalee and she seemed ill at ease with him.  When it came time for her to leave, Natalee didn't seem to be bothered by van der Sloot.  She left with him and the Kalpoe brothers.

****snip****


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Shellbell on June 26, 2005, 01:57:48 AM
Is there any rumors of why they got in a scuffle?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: TTownMike on June 26, 2005, 01:58:27 AM
Quote from: "writenow"
Quote from: "arubagirl"
Well, somebody told Beth Twitty that she were leaving with Joran, or did the Alabama group just go to the van der Sloots because NH and Joran were talking in the casino?


They did also go the CnCs. But I'm also sure they were on the phone with friends and relatives back in Mountain Brook who had by then talked to some of the students/her cousins/close friends.


Ditto writenow!  They were on the phone, looking at survielane at CnC's, asking who knows this guy, getting a name, a finding where he lived, going there, asking "You were seen leaving with Natalee, mind tellin us where you left her?"!

Then after encountering hostile defenciveness they began to DEMAND "WHAT DID YOU DO WITH MY DAUGHTER?"

That aint too hard ta foller now is it?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: AZLady on June 26, 2005, 01:59:07 AM
Quote from: "inspector_detector"


So just keep "Urine" and his dad in prison. And then we'll all be happy right? Since we all know he's guilty of raping and killing Natalee. The Twittys should all be happy and content and can go back home. What more could they have hoped for? :roll:


...um, their daughter?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: igsigs on June 26, 2005, 01:59:13 AM
How can these guys hold up under such intense scrutiny and pressure? since i am too lazy to write out my whole theory on what happenned that night i thought i would just write out what specific charges the current suspects believe they would face if they told the truth.
imo

steve croes - drug dealing leading to death, obstruction

satish k. - body disposal, obstruction

deepak k. - drugs(middle man?) leading to death, body disposal, obstruction

PVDS - obstruction

JVDS - manslaughter, body disposal, obstruction.

in this scenerio, JVDS, Deepak and Croes do not talk because of the seriousness of the charges and PVDS and Satish do not talk to try and save son/brother.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Anna on June 26, 2005, 02:00:25 AM
As to the confusion about when NH met Joren, ever talk to somebody without knowing their name or anything about them?  This might especially happen in a place where you do not know many people.  Ever talk to the clerk at the Dry Cleaners or the supermarket without knowing their name nor they yours except maybe from your check or receipt?

Ever speak to the people in the next cabin on a cruise without knowing all about them?  Just say hi in passing?  The point is not that NH never spoke to Joren at all but that they did not even know each others names until the Sunday that she disappeared despite having seen each other around.  If they had, it would have been pretty odd for her to introduce herself as her friend says she did on Sunday.

That is unless, again, there is some implication the the MB kid is just lying about it for no real reason at all.  Why would she lie that NH told Joren her name on Sunday if that did not happen?  Just to get herself grilled more about it?  I doubt it.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Getagrip on June 26, 2005, 02:00:26 AM
Quote from: "TTownMike"
If anyone thinks Jug is outta line, FERGITTABOUTIT!

LMAO! Gotta love Mike  :lol:

Totally agree with you. Although Natalee may not be his own flesh and blood daughter, Jug sees the pain and torture his wife is going through and is acting as her protector.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Whitney on June 26, 2005, 02:00:47 AM
Quote from: "CancunMole"
Quote from: "wantsanswers"
Quote from: "Whitney"
Quote from: "[b
CancunMole[/b]"]
Quote from: "arubagirl"
If Jug said that, and AvdS is going to be detained, then I guess we know who's running the show.

AvdS wasn't on the island, so she couldn't see/hear anything. And anything that JvdS told her she doesn't have to reveal, so basically, there is no point.


This, I'm sure will not be popular but, my dog wouldn't let Jug in my house with all his vinegar. To me, the way the vdSs' dogs reacted to strangers, told me volumes about them as people who live/brought the dogs up. Barking but tails awagin'.


CancunMole...sort of my point I'll be making...

If you saw the tape with Greta and Beth Holloway/Twitty making that surprise visit to the VDS-household...there was NO BARKING...in fact, there was tail-wagging behaviour by both of the dogs...and I think that voice was Beth HT's voice calling out, initially to the dogs, and then yelling, 'are you home?' to the inhabitants...all the dogs continued to wag their tales...with heads BOWED...


They knew that Beth had authority...there was NO DOUBT.


I think its sad some of you guys are afraid of Jug, a lot of hot air like Trump. I don't really care for that type of attitude, I wouldn't jump down his throat.. That is how they hide their emotions, don't cry or they will think you are weak. Trump says that to everyone.


Please, don't even mention Trump. I'm not afraid of Jug, I think he's an ah. I don't think he helps at all. My dog would not have liked any shrill voice, but I live in the "North".

\
...if you dissect it...and sorry for the BOLD...but I'm not certain any of us are saying/singing a different tune...I'll just go on the record...: (sounds like a lead-into-a Greta show...:

IMO, there's a dynamic betwen the Jug-BTH...that's different in their pursutit of NH!...both want to get this resolved...but in their heart-of-hearts...that'd be their souls...it's expressed the way BHT does, and the way the-Jug does...and that'd be the PC way I can 'splain-it
.
[/b]


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: tkubi7 on June 26, 2005, 02:00:50 AM
Quote from: "inspector_detector"
Quote from: "TTownMike"
Quote from: "DT?)[/quote


So just keep "Urine" and his dad in prison. And then we'll all be happy right? Since we all know he's guilty of raping and killing Natalee. The Twittys should all be happy and content and can go back home. What more could they have hoped for? :roll:


Their daughter!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: TTownMike on June 26, 2005, 02:00:54 AM
Quote from: "Selena"
the very first post on this topic at visitaruba.com bb stated she left with a drug dealer, it was by a mother from the group, they knew on the 31st that she left with someone that they were concerned about. the topic thread was HELP. How to contact police!


The accumulation of reports about the person she was last seen with revealed a discription of "a local drug dealer"!  Questions were asked!  Answers were given!  How bout that?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: CancunMole on June 26, 2005, 02:01:35 AM
Quote from: "KKM"
Quote
They did also go the CnCs. But I'm also sure they were on the phone with friends and relatives back in Mountain Brook who had by then talked to some of the students/her cousins/close friends.
That makes perfect sense.  I know you've all seen Marcia Twitty on tv (Jug's brother's wife and the twin boys' mom).  All Beth had to do was talk to Marcia - I am sure she's perfectly capable of getting information from those on the trip and passing it on to Beth.  There you have it - Beth didn't really NEED to talk to the kids, Marcia, Thomas and Hunter could have taken care of that for her.


Well, guess what, there is one person, me, who doesn't believe that their cell phones worked from C&C to MB.  When is "by then"???????


Title: Re: JORAN's B DAY
Post by: boxopen on June 26, 2005, 02:02:30 AM
Quote from: "Selena"
Jorans official Bday August 6. 86. according to a cache of a sports roster for school it's June 8th,..take your pic
Hi. From a previous msg in this thread he's born 6 August 87.
The "Aug 6" vs "Jun 8" divergence could be because US date are writed MMDD as "8/6" but european write DDMM as "6/8". :wink:


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: inspector_detector on June 26, 2005, 02:03:12 AM
Quote from: "AZLady"
Quote from: "inspector_detector"


So just keep "Urine" and his dad in prison. And then we'll all be happy right? Since we all know he's guilty of raping and killing Natalee. The Twittys should all be happy and content and can go back home. What more could they have hoped for? :roll:


...um, their daughter?


Didn't you hear? "Urine" and his dad and the evil Kalpoe brothers raped killed and dismembered poor Natalee, then fed her to the sharks? Yeah, that's it. Why even bother looking? We all know what happened...


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: nikkibnurse on June 26, 2005, 02:03:35 AM
Quote from: "Getagrip"
Quote from: "TTownMike"
If anyone thinks Jug is outta line, FERGITTABOUTIT!

LMAO! Gotta love Mike  :lol:

Totally agree with you. Although Natalee may not be his own flesh and blood daughter, Jug sees the pain and torture his wife is going through and is acting as her protector.



I was wondering, does anybody HAPPEN to know how long Beth and Jug have been married? Maybe she is like a daughter if he has basically aided in raising her since she was young...i have been wondering about that.....


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: puggywug on June 26, 2005, 02:04:17 AM
Quote from: "inspector_detector"
So just keep "Urine" and his dad in prison. And then we'll all be happy right? Since we all know he's guilty of raping and killing Natalee. The Twittys should all be happy and content and can go back home. What more could they have hoped for? :roll:

That none of this tragedy had ever occured and their daughter was at home, safe and sound??? :roll:


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: TTownMike on June 26, 2005, 02:04:19 AM
Quote from: "KerinTX"
Hi Shell....you knew about the hearing being delayed right?


Hey Kerin!  Whutchudoin?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: AZLady on June 26, 2005, 02:05:00 AM
Quote from: "CancunMole"

Well, guess what, there is one person, me, who doesn't believe that their cell phones worked from C&C to MB.  When is "by then"???????


The cell phones only need to be programmed to send/receive international calls.  This was done when Beth arrived on the island.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: TTownMike on June 26, 2005, 02:05:25 AM
Quote from: "nikkibnurse"
ok, its late and I am just gonna be a dumba** and ask this b/c sometimes ya'lls abbreviations throw me off..justtrying to catch up here with the posts..what is an MSM? <hanging head in embarrassment because i know it will be obvious when i hear it>


LOL!  No fence!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: bobntexas on June 26, 2005, 02:05:28 AM
Quote from: "nikkibnurse"
Quote from: "Getagrip"
Quote from: "TTownMike"
If anyone thinks Jug is outta line, FERGITTABOUTIT!

LMAO! Gotta love Mike  :lol:

Totally agree with you. Although Natalee may not be his own flesh and blood daughter, Jug sees the pain and torture his wife is going through and is acting as her protector.



I was wondering, does anybody HAPPEN to know how long Beth and Jug have been married? Maybe she is like a daughter if he has basically aided in raising her since she was young...i have been wondering about that.....


7 years


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: iquitos on June 26, 2005, 02:05:43 AM
Quote from: "Scott"
Quote from: "Ladyhawke112"

If he regularly does these heinous acts, as a regular, with all this worldwide publicity, wouldn't another victim have come forward by now?


Not if he strictly targeted girls who were already intoxicated, heading back to the States the next day.  A lawyer representing an American girl who was admittedly very drunk would have a rather difficult time getting a rape conviction against Joran in an Aruban court.

If there is any pattern to his behavior, I would also lean to believe that he boasts about his father's standing as a judge on island, thus further intimidating any girl who can't recall exactly what happened the previous night.


I has been long enough for any woman who had any suspect encounter with Joran v/d sloot to have come forward. Maybe they have.  However, we have not heard of them.  Nor has anything been proven against Joran.  So it is no more than a theory that Joran is a serial date rapist.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: CancunMole on June 26, 2005, 02:07:06 AM
Quote from: "iquitos"
Quote from: "writenow"
Quote from: "Selena"
I am shorter and weigh less than Nat, but I tell you what, after 5 vodka drinks they'd be carrying me to a cab.


And the fact that they weren't carrying her shows she didn't drink 5 vodkas.


 that would depend on several factors, including her prior drinking habits, what she had in her stomach, etc. we all know them


I should change my name to "A Mother of A Son", thank you because we've had DIFFERENT explainantions of individuals conditions upon depating from C&C.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: TTownMike on June 26, 2005, 02:07:28 AM
Quote from: "Red"
Quote from: "writenow"
Quote from: "CancunMole"
I am convinced that the "young adults", not "kids" who have appeared on National TV have a prepared "script". Therefore, therefore there should be the number of inconsistnecises we heard.


Apparently you haven't met our little Dash.

No scripts, Cancun. You're reaching here.


What many of you may not be understanding is that the AL teens that went on TV did not have scripts. Actually just the opposite that I would defer to arlee to explain if she wishes. It has been researched and backed up by calls that I have made.

Maybe the teens that everyone wants to hear from would go on the MSM shows if they were treated with respect and told the truth. These teens committed no crime yet they are sometimes given a harder time than they actual suspects in this case.

Do not confuse nervousness and bewilderment with inconsistencies.


Yeah RED  And leave us not fail to understand that the interrogations in here at times would tend to drive em off, too!  Sotaspeak!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Kipster on June 26, 2005, 02:07:42 AM
>>van der Sloot had an angry pushing match with Natalee's friends just hours before she vanished.

Nice scoop National E. However, after being reminded of that after 2 weeks, one punch from either party would have ended the freaking night 'peacefully'. Geez, what a story; it's so crazy I actually believe there's a slight chance she's alive! Any other case--no way in hell.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Sobelle on June 26, 2005, 02:07:45 AM
iquitos - Thanks for the links you posted.

pybrid - Thanks for the article


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: inspector_detector on June 26, 2005, 02:07:45 AM
Quote from: "igsigs"
How can these guys hold up under such intense scrutiny and pressure? since i am too lazy to write out my whole theory on what happenned that night i thought i would just write out what specific charges the current suspects believe they would face if they told the truth.
imo

steve croes - drug dealing leading to death, obstruction

satish k. - body disposal, obstruction

deepak k. - drugs(middle man?) leading to death, body disposal, obstruction

PVDS - obstruction

JVDS - manslaughter, body disposal, obstruction.

in this scenerio, JVDS, Deepak and Croes do not talk because of the seriousness of the charges and PVDS and Satish do not talk to try and save son/brother.


Maybe it's because they're innocent? BTW why don't you list the "evidence" against them. Sorry, that was rhetorical question because there is no evidence...


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: DT on June 26, 2005, 02:08:08 AM
Quote from: "nikkibnurse"
Quote from: "Getagrip"
Quote from: "TTownMike"
If anyone thinks Jug is outta line, FERGITTABOUTIT!

LMAO! Gotta love Mike  :lol:

Totally agree with you. Although Natalee may not be his own flesh and blood daughter, Jug sees the pain and torture his wife is going through and is acting as her protector.



I was wondering, does anybody HAPPEN to know how long Beth and Jug have been married? Maybe she is like a daughter if he has basically aided in raising her since she was young...i have been wondering about that.....


I think this article might answer some of your questions.

http://www.clintonnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20050616/NEWS/506160357/1001


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: puggywug on June 26, 2005, 02:08:37 AM
Quote from: "iquitos"
Quote from: "Scott"
Quote from: "Ladyhawke112"

If he regularly does these heinous acts, as a regular, with all this worldwide publicity, wouldn't another victim have come forward by now?


Not if he strictly targeted girls who were already intoxicated, heading back to the States the next day.  A lawyer representing an American girl who was admittedly very drunk would have a rather difficult time getting a rape conviction against Joran in an Aruban court.

If there is any pattern to his behavior, I would also lean to believe that he boasts about his father's standing as a judge on island, thus further intimidating any girl who can't recall exactly what happened the previous night.

I has been long enough for any woman who had any suspect encounter with Joran v/d sloot to have come forward. Maybe they have.  However, we have not heard of them.  Nor has anything been proven against Joran.  So it is no more than a theory that Joran is a serial date rapist.

(Edited to move my post to the proper place)
I thought we wouldn't know whether or not other potential victims have come forward because details of the case cannot be dislcosed by LE according to Dutch law; anything revealed is inadmissable in court, right? Isn't that why none of us know any facts?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Getagrip on June 26, 2005, 02:08:51 AM
Quote from: "inspector_detector"
Didn't you hear? "Urine" and his dad and the evil Kalpoe brothers raped killed and dismembered poor Natalee, then fed her to the sharks? Yeah, that's it. Why even bother looking? We all know what happened...

When I read comments such as the above, I start to wonder...have you (general 'you') ever tried imagining that it was your daughter who was missing?

inspector, I pray to God (and I'm hardly a religious person) that your comments don't turn out to be true - because despite all the information that has been 'sealed off' from us due to the different law system - everything points to foul play from the people now in custody.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Ladyhawke112 on June 26, 2005, 02:08:51 AM
Quote from: "Scott"
Quote from: "Ladyhawke112"

If he regularly does these heinous acts, as a regular, with all this worldwide publicity, wouldn't another victim have come forward by now?


Not if he strictly targeted girls who were already intoxicated, heading back to the States the next day.  A lawyer representing an American girl who was admittedly very drunk would have a rather difficult time getting a rape conviction against Joran in an Aruban court.

If there is any pattern to his behavior, I would also lean to believe that he boasts about his father's standing as a judge on island, thus further intimidating any girl who can't recall exactly what happened the previous night.


I was not talking about other victims in terms of them seeking conviction. It just seems likely if he regularly targeted intoxicated American girls leaving the next day - one of them might recognize his picture, which has been all over the news.  It seems that whether his father is a judge or just one-in-training at this point is moot, since he is also in custody. It's the perfect time for a victim of this supposed serial preditor to come forward and write the best-selling book! There hasn't been one - or even a fake one out to just make a buck - doesn't that fact strike you as interesting?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Whitney on June 26, 2005, 02:08:59 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Columbo--

I do not know yet how to post a quote but think they waste too much space anyway.  What few kids have granted interviews have had them twisted and have been misquoted.  They are just kids and are not accustomed to being interrogated or made to feel that they did something wrong as has happened in other interviews.  They have been harshly asked why they did not look out for their friend and things like that.  They had no idea what was going to happen.  If you were 17-18 and on national media with someone badgering you as to why you did not look out for a member of your group, what exactly would you say?

Interesting that some want the kids grilled far more than the suspects.  And no, these are not stepford kids and not perfect but the sure do not go out drinking and gambling every night, either.  Just not done in this part of the country.

They are also from very privileged families, some of the most privileged in the country, some of them.  They have condos on the beach, most all homes have nice swimming pools, many private planes, etc.  Joren would not be in their league in this country.  I seriously doubt NH was very impressed with him at all, contrary to what some think.  He was younger than her for one thing and she was a very mature girl for her age.  I think she tried to be friendly and this is where it got her.  And Boyz2Men is no biggie here, either.  Doubt she would even bother to attend if they were in B'ham.  My kids wouldn't for sure.  Most of those kids also spent the entire days on the beach.  They were not some desperate gang out for any and every thrill.  I know dozens of kids just like them who do not have to have the wild stuff to have a good life.  And I don't believe any bartender can remember the exact number of drinks served to every customer like that, either.  

So as I asked before, why trash the MB kids, the victim or her family?  I believe if there were any dirt it would have come out long before now and most of what I have seen is just pure fabrication of dirt/suspicion where none exists.  Believe it or not, lots of families do not have deep dark evil secrets but even if they did, so what?  Does that mean their daughter should be made to disappear and likely killed in some horrific manner?  What am I missing here?   :shock:


Just want to quote/save this post for my own...she's special!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: pybird on June 26, 2005, 02:09:06 AM
Quote from: "Sobelle"
iquitos - Thanks for the links you posted.

pybrid - Thanks for the article


You're quite welcome.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: MOgirl on June 26, 2005, 02:09:12 AM
Regarding Jug's description of PVDS' and Deepak's obstruction the first night, in how (I assume) they both were telling JVDS (who Jug says wanted to help) "not to say anything." I personally think that is really why PVDS was arrested. But more curiously to me, how does Jug's description of that night jive with  Beth's, who claimed that JVDS was rude and arrogant to her?[/quote]

Trying to catch up.  Good observation - I didn't catch this conflict in their respective descriptions.  So wonder which way it happened?

What were the Representative's remarks - I'm sorry, it was referred to here earlier today.  I have been looking but can't find anything about it now.  Something said buy a US "higher up" - Sen or Rep, perhaps?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: AZLady on June 26, 2005, 02:09:40 AM
Quote from: "iquitos"

I has been long enough for any woman who had any suspect encounter with Joran v/d sloot to have come forward. Maybe they have.  However, we have not heard of them.  Nor has anything been proven against Joran.  So it is no more than a theory that Joran is a serial date rapist.


However, his friends on his websites do tease him about "roofies" and his friends and even his family say how much he likes women.  And he is fond of hanging out at C&C's where many tourist women go.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: DT on June 26, 2005, 02:10:20 AM
Quote from: "inspector_detector"
Quote from: "igsigs"
How can these guys hold up under such intense scrutiny and pressure? since i am too lazy to write out my whole theory on what happenned that night i thought i would just write out what specific charges the current suspects believe they would face if they told the truth.
imo

steve croes - drug dealing leading to death, obstruction

satish k. - body disposal, obstruction

deepak k. - drugs(middle man?) leading to death, body disposal, obstruction

PVDS - obstruction

JVDS - manslaughter, body disposal, obstruction.

in this scenerio, JVDS, Deepak and Croes do not talk because of the seriousness of the charges and PVDS and Satish do not talk to try and save son/brother.


Maybe it's because they're innocent? BTW why don't you list the "evidence" against them. Sorry, that was rhetorical question because there is no evidence...


Lying repeatedly is pretty good evidence against him if you ask me.  I don't know what he did, but he has something to hide otherwise he wouldn't be lying.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: columbo on June 26, 2005, 02:11:12 AM
Quote from: "Red"
columbo

Quote
But, aside from the few who have come foward on O'Reilly and Van Susteran, we have nothing else to go on. If the students (or parents of students) want to tell their story, then why not speak to the media? Why would this mother tell her story to Scared Monkey's and not CNN, FOX or any other news org. ??


Wow, I almost take offense to that comment.  :shock:

Here might be your answer. Maybe just maybe, Scared Monkeys has acted with more professionalism, courtesy and honesty with the MB teens and their parents than the MSM?

Trust me when I say this, I have said to more than 1 MSM producer this past week that they better start doing right by these kids. All remember, this is not like interviewing an adult. Like it or not they are teens and the same sleazy MSM rules do not apply.

Why would they come on here huh and say it. Thanks a lot.


Wow.  :shock: I'm almost take offense that you would take offense at my comment! :shock:

Why wouldn't the MB students use the MSM to get their story out? How do you know that the MSM uses SLEAZY rules?? I enjoy this website, but in all honesty, it IS a website. I'm not trying to be confrontational, but are you suggesting that this website is the end all of all news?? We have the MSM giving every account of the suspects, yet there is no word on Natalee's friend's statements in the MSM. Sorry you're so offended by my question. Geez!


Title: Asked not to talk to press
Post by: sunmoonstars on June 26, 2005, 02:12:13 AM
Reynolds didn't elaborate, and Barron said people who went on the trip aren't publicly discussing details of what happened in Aruba at the request of Holloway's family, which fears the publicity could hamper the investigation.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: puggywug on June 26, 2005, 02:13:03 AM
Quote from: "Ladyhawke112"
Quote from: "Scott"
Quote from: "Ladyhawke112"

If he regularly does these heinous acts, as a regular, with all this worldwide publicity, wouldn't another victim have come forward by now?


Not if he strictly targeted girls who were already intoxicated, heading back to the States the next day.  A lawyer representing an American girl who was admittedly very drunk would have a rather difficult time getting a rape conviction against Joran in an Aruban court.

If there is any pattern to his behavior, I would also lean to believe that he boasts about his father's standing as a judge on island, thus further intimidating any girl who can't recall exactly what happened the previous night.


I was not talking about other victims in terms of them seeking conviction. It just seems likely if he regularly targeted intoxicated American girls leaving the next day - one of them might recognize his picture, which has been all over the news.  It seems that whether his father is a judge or just one-in-training at this point is moot, since he is also in custody. It's the perfect time for a victim of this supposed serial preditor to come forward and write the best-selling book! There hasn't been one - or even a fake one out to just make a buck - doesn't that fact strike you as interesting?

ONCE AGAIN, I repeat, how do you know no one has come forward? How would any of us know? We don't know ANY facts about the evidence because it is against Dutch law to reveal it.  Anything disclosed to the media is inadmissable in trial.   :)


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: TTownMike on June 26, 2005, 02:13:45 AM
Quote from: "CancunMole"
Quote from: "arubagirl"
Well, somebody told Beth Twitty that she were leaving with Joran, or did the Alabama group just go to the van der Sloots because NH and Joran were talking in the casino?


Or, could it have been because Joran beat the pants off some people at cards in the casino and NH introduced herself to him at some point and indicated an interest? I'd like to know when NH really met Joran? Is it per Ed who had seen him with NH and her friends or per others, or on video? If this were my son. I'd have someone in ALA asking questions,,,,,,,,,,,,,,


Uh Cancun?  WHEREYOUBEEN?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Whitney on June 26, 2005, 02:15:32 AM
Quote from: "pybird"
Quote from: "CancunMole"
Quote from: "Charlotte"
Quote from: "CancunMole"
Quote from: "Charlotte"
I'm sure Beth Twitty has spoken with kids on the trip.  The article in the July 4 issue of People magazine mentions that Jug spoke with Natalee's cousins Thomas and Hunter Twitty who were on the trip and learned that Thomas has played poker with Joran that same night.


Really, and who won?


Don't know


Don't you wonder? Did someone get their arse beat? Who was involved in the "scuffle"? Where was the "scuffle"? What was the "scuffle" about? We're talking peoples lives here, too many questions for this mother. If it were my kid being blamed, I'd be asking questions.




I can post what the National Enquirer printed 1 week ago if you are interested.  I know it's a tabloid, please don't flame.  It does give a bit of a different spin than we've heard before.
pybird, please do!...I didn't see it...(I was going to add that I haven't seen the JFK Jr one either...but I did read it until my last package of chicken thighs rung up and the clerk asked me, "how're you going to pay for this?"

Thanks for posting it...or please, do PM me with it!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: puggywug on June 26, 2005, 02:15:57 AM
Quote from: "columbo"
Quote from: "Red"
columbo

Quote
But, aside from the few who have come foward on O'Reilly and Van Susteran, we have nothing else to go on. If the students (or parents of students) want to tell their story, then why not speak to the media? Why would this mother tell her story to Scared Monkey's and not CNN, FOX or any other news org. ??


Wow, I almost take offense to that comment.  :shock:

Here might be your answer. Maybe just maybe, Scared Monkeys has acted with more professionalism, courtesy and honesty with the MB teens and their parents than the MSM?

Trust me when I say this, I have said to more than 1 MSM producer this past week that they better start doing right by these kids. All remember, this is not like interviewing an adult. Like it or not they are teens and the same sleazy MSM rules do not apply.

Why would they come on here huh and say it. Thanks a lot.


Wow.  :shock: I'm almost take offense that you would take offense at my comment! :shock:

Why wouldn't the MB students use the MSM to get their story out? How do you know that the MSM uses SLEAZY rules?? I enjoy this website, but in all honesty, it IS a website. I'm not trying to be confrontational, but are you suggesting that this website is the end all of all news?? We have the MSM giving every account of the suspects, yet there is no word on Natalee's friend's statements in the MSM. Sorry you're so offended by my question. Geez!

UH, oh... :shock:


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: igsigs on June 26, 2005, 02:16:07 AM
Quote from: "inspector_detector"
Quote from: "igsigs"
How can these guys hold up under such intense scrutiny and pressure? since i am too lazy to write out my whole theory on what happenned that night i thought i would just write out what specific charges the current suspects believe they would face if they told the truth.
imo

steve croes - drug dealing leading to death, obstruction

satish k. - body disposal, obstruction

deepak k. - drugs(middle man?) leading to death, body disposal, obstruction

PVDS - obstruction

JVDS - manslaughter, body disposal, obstruction.

in this scenerio, JVDS, Deepak and Croes do not talk because of the seriousness of the charges and PVDS and Satish do not talk to try and save son/brother.


Maybe it's because they're innocent? BTW why don't you list the "evidence" against them. Sorry, that was rhetorical question because there is no evidence...


You saying that there is "no evidence" is the same as me saying that there "is evidence". neither of us know what LE has. i was just giving an opinion.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: TTownMike on June 26, 2005, 02:17:00 AM
Quote from: "columbo"
The woman's daughter DID tell her story to the MSM - it was Dash's mother who wrote that post.

Ok, sorry....I don't know who Dash is. My point is we have no idea if Natalee thought she was getting into a cab or her friends assumed she was getting into a cab. For all we know, Nat was comfortable enough with Joran to leave with him, or maybe not. If we had more statements from Nat's friends her name/reputation would not be in question. It seems like the MB folks are getting upset by what they're reading here, but we don't have enough information from the other students/friends to discount the rumors and speculations.

Thanks for calling me on my error though, Puggy. :) I love to be proven wrong.  :x  :)  8)


Re Dash's mom, Nat said she was going back to HI!  Granted being 4 weeks into this some folks weren't payin tention, Iguess!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Lausa on June 26, 2005, 02:17:01 AM
Quote from: "DT"
I think this article might answer some of your questions.

http://www.clintonnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20050616/NEWS/506160357/1001


Now that was an article that did add dimension to Natalee!  Maybe it's just the difference in Mississippi and Mountain Brook style.  I love the idea of a girl who'd invent a closet with a magic KoolAde button, or who'd bring in a prayer list that even included the boys she didn't like.  Nice depiction of her personality.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Compananzi on June 26, 2005, 02:17:28 AM
Quote from: "TTownMike"
Quote from: "nikkibnurse"
ok, its late and I am just gonna be a dumba** and ask this b/c sometimes ya'lls abbreviations throw me off..justtrying to catch up here with the posts..what is an MSM? <hanging head in embarrassment because i know it will be obvious when i hear it>


Main scream Media .... uh Stream..


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Anna on June 26, 2005, 02:17:32 AM
The MB kids HAVE been quoted and on TV, in the MSM.  I don't know what you mean, I believe it is CancunMole who does not seem to ever catch the interviews.  This was a group of 140 students, not some intimate group of five or six.  I would think the vast majority of them would not be monitoring NH's movements but would be concentrating on having fun themselves.  I doubt they can remember which day they might have seen her where, etc.  Many of them might hardly know her.

But I have seen several on TV and there are articles posted in the newspapers all the time.  What exactly is it you want them to do or say?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: puggywug on June 26, 2005, 02:19:12 AM
Quote from: "Lausa"
Quote from: "DT"
I think this article might answer some of your questions.
http://www.clintonnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20050616/NEWS/506160357/1001

Now that was an article that did add dimension to Natalee!  Maybe it's just the difference in Mississippi and Mountain Brook style.  I love the idea of a girl who'd invent a closet with a magic KoolAde button, or who'd bring in a prayer list that even included the boys she didn't like.  Nice depiction of her personality.


Also, didn't someone who knows Natalee also say that she babysits children with autism?  She sounds like such a warm person.


Title: NH
Post by: sunmoonstars on June 26, 2005, 02:19:15 AM
In regards to the MB group not talking.......here is the proof they were asked by the Holloway family not to.

Reynolds didn't elaborate, and Barron said people who went on the trip aren't publicly discussing details of what happened in Aruba at the request of Holloway's family, which fears the publicity could hamper the investigation.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: inspector_detector on June 26, 2005, 02:19:52 AM
Quote from: "DT"
Quote from: "inspector_detector"
Quote from: "igsigs"
How can these guys hold up under such intense scrutiny and pressure? since i am too lazy to write out my whole theory on what happenned that night i thought i would just write out what specific charges the current suspects believe they would face if they told the truth.
imo

steve croes - drug dealing leading to death, obstruction

satish k. - body disposal, obstruction

deepak k. - drugs(middle man?) leading to death, body disposal, obstruction

PVDS - obstruction

JVDS - manslaughter, body disposal, obstruction.

in this scenerio, JVDS, Deepak and Croes do not talk because of the seriousness of the charges and PVDS and Satish do not talk to try and save son/brother.


Maybe it's because they're innocent? BTW why don't you list the "evidence" against them. Sorry, that was rhetorical question because there is no evidence...


Lying repeatedly is pretty good evidence against him if you ask me.  I don't know what he did, but he has something to hide otherwise he wouldn't be lying.


If everyone that ever told a lie was in jail, there would be a lot of people in jail.  :roll:


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: pybird on June 26, 2005, 02:20:34 AM
Quote from: "Whitney"
Quote from: "pybird"
Quote from: "CancunMole"
Quote from: "Charlotte"
Quote from: "CancunMole"
Quote from: "Charlotte"
I'm sure Beth Twitty has spoken with kids on the trip.  The article in the July 4 issue of People magazine mentions that Jug spoke with Natalee's cousins Thomas and Hunter Twitty who were on the trip and learned that Thomas has played poker with Joran that same night.


Really, and who won?


Don't know


Don't you wonder? Did someone get their arse beat? Who was involved in the "scuffle"? Where was the "scuffle"? What was the "scuffle" about? We're talking peoples lives here, too many questions for this mother. If it were my kid being blamed, I'd be asking questions.




I can post what the National Enquirer printed 1 week ago if you are interested.  I know it's a tabloid, please don't flame.  It does give a bit of a different spin than we've heard before.
pybird, please do!...I didn't see it...(I was going to add that I haven't seen the JFK Jr one either...but I did read it until my last package of chicken thighs rung up and the clerk asked me, "how're you going to pay for this?"

Thanks for posting it...or please, do PM me with it!


Whitney, I posted a snippet from the article a page or 2 back.  Let me know if you cannot find.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: CancunMole on June 26, 2005, 02:20:39 AM
Quote from: "Red"
Quote from: "writenow"
Quote from: "CancunMole"
I am convinced that the "young adults", not "kids" who have appeared on National TV have a prepared "script". Therefore, therefore there should be the number of inconsistnecises we heard.


Apparently you haven't met our little Dash.

No scripts, Cancun. You're reaching here.


What many of you may not be understanding is that the AL teens that went on TV did not have scripts. Actually just the opposite that I would defer to arlee to explain if she wishes. It has been researched and backed up by calls that I have made.

Maybe the teens that everyone wants to hear from would go on the MSM shows if they were treated with respect and told the truth. These teens committed no crime yet they are sometimes given a harder time than they actual suspects in this case.

Do not confuse nervousness and bewilderment with inconsistencies.


I may be behind because of my dial up connection but believe me, I'm not BEHIND. This girl's mother has from the get go been IMOO, been beyond involvement. I personally question what the motives are? I have bolded my question so there is no other question about what I am asking. I'm from Maine originally and I'm sick of the BS. Dash is no more a confidant of NH than ED. Did no one else (with the replay, not get that ED deviated from the script?)


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Getagrip on June 26, 2005, 02:22:49 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
But I have seen several on TV and there are articles posted in the newspapers all the time.  What exactly is it you want them to do or say?

Good point, Anna. I find it bewildering that some come out in the defense of Arubans for being 'media shy' and not grant the same courtesy to the MBHS students, esp. since they are going through such a difficult time.

The fact is, they have been contacted and interviewed by the proper authorities (FBI). They don't owe us (the puclic) anything right now and I appreciate that they have felt comfortable with the SM crowd to give us some insight and information.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Lausa on June 26, 2005, 02:22:50 AM
Quote from: "AZLady"
Quote from: "iquitos"

I has been long enough for any woman who had any suspect encounter with Joran v/d sloot to have come forward. Maybe they have.  However, we have not heard of them.  Nor has anything been proven against Joran.  So it is no more than a theory that Joran is a serial date rapist.


However, his friends on his websites do tease him about "roofies" and his friends and even his family say how much he likes women.  And he is fond of hanging out at C&C's where many tourist women go.
Locker room talk?  Bullshooting?  I'm 55, but I sure remember the way my younger brother and his friends used to "brag"...the more braggadacious (spelling) a fellow was, the less likely there was that much truth.  The guys who were "scoring" were much less likely to talk.  But that was what==well, skip the math, let's say a long time ago.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: puggywug on June 26, 2005, 02:23:27 AM
Quote from: "CancunMole"
Quote from: "Red"
Quote from: "writenow"
Quote from: "CancunMole"
I am convinced that the "young adults", not "kids" who have appeared on National TV have a prepared "script". Therefore, therefore there should be the number of inconsistnecises we heard.

Apparently you haven't met our little Dash.
No scripts, Cancun. You're reaching here.

What many of you may not be understanding is that the AL teens that went on TV did not have scripts. Actually just the opposite that I would defer to arlee to explain if she wishes. It has been researched and backed up by calls that I have made.
Maybe the teens that everyone wants to hear from would go on the MSM shows if they were treated with respect and told the truth. These teens committed no crime yet they are sometimes given a harder time than they actual suspects in this case.
Do not confuse nervousness and bewilderment with inconsistencies.

I may be behind because of my dial up connection but believe me, I'm not BEHIND. This girl's mother has from the get go been IMOO, been beyond involvement. I personally question what the motives are? I have bolded my question so there is no other question about what I am asking. I'm from Maine originally and I'm sick of the BS. Dash is no more a confidant of NH than ED. Did no one else (with the replay, not get that ED deviated from the script?)

Actually, Dash said she is not one of Natalee's closest friends.  But, they are friends, and they were Calculus partners.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: bobntexas on June 26, 2005, 02:23:54 AM
I may be behind because of my dial up connection but believe me, I'm not BEHIND. This girl's mother has from the get go been IMOO, been beyond involvement. I personally question what the motives are? I have bolded my question so there is no other question about what I am asking. I'm from Maine originally and I'm sick of the BS. Dash is no more a confidant of NH than ED. Did no one else (with the replay, not get that ED deviated from the script?)[/quote]

What does being from Maine originally have to do with this?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Red on June 26, 2005, 02:24:02 AM
Quote from: "TTownMike"
Quote from: "Red"
Quote from: "writenow"
Quote from: "CancunMole"
I am convinced that the "young adults", not "kids" who have appeared on National TV have a prepared "script". Therefore, therefore there should be the number of inconsistnecises we heard.


Apparently you haven't met our little Dash.

No scripts, Cancun. You're reaching here.


What many of you may not be understanding is that the AL teens that went on TV did not have scripts. Actually just the opposite that I would defer to arlee to explain if she wishes. It has been researched and backed up by calls that I have made.

Maybe the teens that everyone wants to hear from would go on the MSM shows if they were treated with respect and told the truth. These teens committed no crime yet they are sometimes given a harder time than they actual suspects in this case.

Do not confuse nervousness and bewilderment with inconsistencies.


Yeah RED  And leave us not fail to understand that the interrogations in here at time would tend to drive em off, too!  Sotaspeak!


I agree. The teens came on here and answered ever question people had long before they ever hit the MSM circus shows. Even when they answered the questions many just badgered them because it was not the answer they wanted to hear.

I was told in some cases the 3rd degree they got here made the shoes a bit easier. However, that does not justify some of the rude behavior they received. People need to understand who the suspects are in this case and not go after the witnesses.

Sure everyone would like all the answers, but even eye witnesses do not remember everything. Do not ever forget, they are teens.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Anna on June 26, 2005, 02:24:24 AM
Quote from: "inspector_detector"
Quote from: "DT"
Quote from: "inspector_detector"
Quote from: "igsigs"
How can these guys hold up under such intense scrutiny and pressure? since i am too lazy to write out my whole theory on what happenned that night i thought i would just write out what specific charges the current suspects believe they would face if they told the truth.
imo

steve croes - drug dealing leading to death, obstruction

satish k. - body disposal, obstruction

deepak k. - drugs(middle man?) leading to death, body disposal, obstruction

PVDS - obstruction

JVDS - manslaughter, body disposal, obstruction.

in this scenerio, JVDS, Deepak and Croes do not talk because of the seriousness of the charges and PVDS and Satish do not talk to try and save son/brother.


Maybe it's because they're innocent? BTW why don't you list the "evidence" against them. Sorry, that was rhetorical question because there is no evidence...


Lying repeatedly is pretty good evidence against him if you ask me.  I don't know what he did, but he has something to hide otherwise he wouldn't be lying.


If everyone that ever told a lie was in jail, there would be a lot of people in jail.  :roll:



Well, if they tell a lie involving somebody's disappearance and likely death, I would imagine many of them are.  Called obstruction of justice and in this country it is a crime.


Title: Natalee's life
Post by: iquitos on June 26, 2005, 02:24:28 AM
http://www.postherald.com/nw062405.shtml

http://www.godesoto.com/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=7576&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0

http://**/articles/2005/06/24/news/news1.txt

http://www.clarionledger.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20050613/NEWS01/506130329/1002


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: inspector_detector on June 26, 2005, 02:24:42 AM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "inspector_detector"
Quote from: "igsigs"
How can these guys hold up under such intense scrutiny and pressure? since i am too lazy to write out my whole theory on what happenned that night i thought i would just write out what specific charges the current suspects believe they would face if they told the truth.
imo

steve croes - drug dealing leading to death, obstruction

satish k. - body disposal, obstruction

deepak k. - drugs(middle man?) leading to death, body disposal, obstruction

PVDS - obstruction

JVDS - manslaughter, body disposal, obstruction.

in this scenerio, JVDS, Deepak and Croes do not talk because of the seriousness of the charges and PVDS and Satish do not talk to try and save son/brother.


Maybe it's because they're innocent? BTW why don't you list the "evidence" against them. Sorry, that was rhetorical question because there is no evidence...


You saying that there is "no evidence" is the same as me saying that there "is evidence". neither of us know what LE has. i was just giving an opinion.


Well let's recount the "evidence" against the 2 security guards.

1. Natalee is missing - therefore you are accused of kidnapping and murder

2. The party boys said she was approached by a black security guard - you guys are black security guards - you're under arrest.

All I can say is that I'm thankfull I don't live in Aruba, or the Netherlands...


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Ladyhawke112 on June 26, 2005, 02:24:44 AM
Quote from: "puggywug"
Quote from: "Ladyhawke112"
Quote from: "Scott"
Quote from: "Ladyhawke112"

If he regularly does these heinous acts, as a regular, with all this worldwide publicity, wouldn't another victim have come forward by now?


Not if he strictly targeted girls who were already intoxicated, heading back to the States the next day.  A lawyer representing an American girl who was admittedly very drunk would have a rather difficult time getting a rape conviction against Joran in an Aruban court.

If there is any pattern to his behavior, I would also lean to believe that he boasts about his father's standing as a judge on island, thus further intimidating any girl who can't recall exactly what happened the previous night.


I was not talking about other victims in terms of them seeking conviction. It just seems likely if he regularly targeted intoxicated American girls leaving the next day - one of them might recognize his picture, which has been all over the news.  It seems that whether his father is a judge or just one-in-training at this point is moot, since he is also in custody. It's the perfect time for a victim of this supposed serial preditor to come forward and write the best-selling book! There hasn't been one - or even a fake one out to just make a buck - doesn't that fact strike you as interesting?

ONCE AGAIN, I repeat, how do you know no one has come forward? How would any of us know? We don't know ANY facts about the evidence because it is against Dutch law to reveal it.  Anything disclosed to the media is inadmissable in trial.   :)


Well puggywug, violated Americans, having returned home, don't have to abide by Dutch law. They can freely talk, as they should to put the guilty away. As long as the Law enforcement/prosecutors/witnesses/attorneys and anyone else on Aruba apparently doesn't talk, the case will go on.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: TTownMike on June 26, 2005, 02:25:18 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Columbo--

I do not know yet how to post a quote but think they waste too much space anyway.  What few kids have granted interviews have had them twisted and have been misquoted.  They are just kids and are not accustomed to being interrogated or made to feel that they did something wrong as has happened in other interviews.  They have been harshly asked why they did not look out for their friend and things like that.  They had no idea what was going to happen.  If you were 17-18 and on national media with someone badgering you as to why you did not look out for a member of your group, what exactly would you say?

Interesting that some want the kids grilled far more than the suspects.  And no, these are not stepford kids and not perfect but the sure do not go out drinking and gambling every night, either.  Just not done in this part of the country.

They are also from very privileged families, some of the most privileged in the country, some of them.  They have condos on the beach, most all homes have nice swimming pools, many private planes, etc.  Joren would not be in their league in this country.  I seriously doubt NH was very impressed with him at all, contrary to what some think.  He was younger than her for one thing and she was a very mature girl for her age.  I think she tried to be friendly and this is where it got her.  And Boyz2Men is no biggie here, either.  Doubt she would even bother to attend if they were in B'ham.  My kids wouldn't for sure.  Most of those kids also spent the entire days on the beach.  They were not some desperate gang out for any and every thrill.  I know dozens of kids just like them who do not have to have the wild stuff to have a good life.  And I don't believe any bartender can remember the exact number of drinks served to every customer like that, either.  

So as I asked before, why trash the MB kids, the victim or her family?  I believe if there were any dirt it would have come out long before now and most of what I have seen is just pure fabrication of dirt/suspicion where none exists.  Believe it or not, lots of families do not have deep dark evil secrets but even if they did, so what?  Does that mean their daughter should be made to disappear and likely killed in some horrific manner?  What am I missing here?   :shock:


Again GO ANNA!  And you hit it bullseye:"I think she tried to be friendly and this is where it got her"!  She messed up!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: DT on June 26, 2005, 02:25:41 AM
Quote from: "inspector_detector"
Quote from: "DT"
Quote from: "inspector_detector"
Quote from: "igsigs"
How can these guys hold up under such intense scrutiny and pressure? since i am too lazy to write out my whole theory on what happenned that night i thought i would just write out what specific charges the current suspects believe they would face if they told the truth.
imo

steve croes - drug dealing leading to death, obstruction

satish k. - body disposal, obstruction

deepak k. - drugs(middle man?) leading to death, body disposal, obstruction

PVDS - obstruction

JVDS - manslaughter, body disposal, obstruction.

in this scenerio, JVDS, Deepak and Croes do not talk because of the seriousness of the charges and PVDS and Satish do not talk to try and save son/brother.


Maybe it's because they're innocent? BTW why don't you list the "evidence" against them. Sorry, that was rhetorical question because there is no evidence...


Lying repeatedly is pretty good evidence against him if you ask me.  I don't know what he did, but he has something to hide otherwise he wouldn't be lying.


If everyone that ever told a lie was in jail, there would be a lot of people in jail.  :roll:


So you are telling me that his repeated lying regarding the disappearence of a missing girl is not evidence against him?  Maybe he is innocent, but his lying has killed any credibility he has and has logically made him the prime suspect in the case.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: writenow on June 26, 2005, 02:25:50 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
As to the confusion about when NH met Joren, ever talk to somebody without knowing their name or anything about them?  This might especially happen in a place where you do not know many people.  Ever talk to the clerk at the Dry Cleaners or the supermarket without knowing their name nor they yours except maybe from your check or receipt?

Ever speak to the people in the next cabin on a cruise without knowing all about them?  Just say hi in passing?  The point is not that NH never spoke to Joren at all but that they did not even know each others names until the Sunday that she disappeared despite having seen each other around.  If they had, it would have been pretty odd for her to introduce herself as her friend says she did on Sunday.

That is unless, again, there is some implication the the MB kid is just lying about it for no real reason at all.  Why would she lie that NH told Joren her name on Sunday if that did not happen?  Just to get herself grilled more about it?  I doubt it.


Yeah, Anna, I think you've got it.
I was confused because the accounts seemed to conflict, but when you think about it, they don't.
The one article said Bryan Reynolds from MBHS broke up a fight at Carlos'nCharlies' the SECOND night they were there. That was Friday night May 27. Then someone said he'd been hanging around the group for a couple of days. He was probably at CnCs and the Holiday Inn Saturday night, and we know he was there Sunday night at HI with his dad which is when Natalee introduced herself.
So what everyone said is true, we've just been assuming Nat introduced herself the first time she saw him. And obviously from the accounts, that's not true.
Also, Joran got into a shoving match with the MBHS kids Sat night/Sun Morning -- so that means he got into it TWICE with them.
Now I"m starting to wonder if maybe all this factored in with Natalee somehow. Something to prove to the MB guys? Ego and temper out of control?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: AZLady on June 26, 2005, 02:26:08 AM
Quote from: "CancunMole


I may be behind because of my dial up connection but believe me, I'm not BEHIND. This girl's mother has from the get go been IMOO, been beyond involvement. I personally question what the motives are? I have bolded my question so there is no other question about what I am asking. I'm from Maine originally and I'm sick of the BS. Dash is no more a confidant of NH than ED. Did no one else (with the replay, not get that ED deviated from the script?)


Cancun, the motives are a mother's love for her daughter!  I bolded the answer so there is no doubt about the answer.  I am a mother of a 21 year old, and I would do the same.  When I mentioned to my daughter that I admired Beth H. Twitty for her strength in the face of incredible pain, my daughter said "Mom, you would do the same!"


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Whitney on June 26, 2005, 02:26:22 AM
Quote from: "writenow"
Quote from: "arubagirl"
Whitney, per another poster he can be tried as an adult.

And with that I'm going to bed.

Good night all.


Nite arubagirl! Thanks for hanging with us!


 so why're you posting on this board Whitney?

whitney:...for now other reason that I came onto, now, saw two of my favs on this board, an Arubagirl...and a writenow type of person...OK? (don't quote me though...IMHO)
...

Look, it's so very difficult to do HTML on the fly as well as as...you know the story....and you have to spell wrods...LOL...

kisses and hugs, whitney[b/]


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: CancunMole on June 26, 2005, 02:27:47 AM
Quote from: "Red"
Quote from: "writenow"
Quote from: "CancunMole"
I am convinced that the "young adults", not "kids" who have appeared on National TV have a prepared "script". Therefore, therefore there should be the number of inconsistnecises we heard.


Apparently you haven't met our little Dash.

No scripts, Cancun. You're reaching here.


What many of you may not be understanding is that the AL teens that went on TV did not have scripts. Actually just the opposite that I would defer to arlee to explain if she wishes. It has been researched and backed up by calls that I have made.

Maybe the teens that everyone wants to hear from would go on the MSM shows if they were treated with respect and told the truth. These teens committed no crime yet they are sometimes given a harder time than they actual suspects in this case.

Do not confuse nervousness and bewilderment with inconsistencies.


SORRY RED, I don''t believe that! I BELIEVE THAT ALL OF THEM WHO WERE ON THIS TRIP WERE IN FACT GIVEN A SCRIPT TO FOLLOW.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: puggywug on June 26, 2005, 02:28:34 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Well, if they tell a lie involving somebody's disappearance and likely death, I would imagine many of them are.  Called obstruction of justice and in this country it is a crime.


ANNA,
Check your PM  :)


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: AZLady on June 26, 2005, 02:29:32 AM
Quote from: "CancunMole"


SORRY RED, I don''t believe that! I BELIEVE THAT ALL OF THEM WHO WERE ON THIS TRIP WERE IN FACT GIVEN A SCRIPT TO FOLLOW.


WHY?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Compananzi on June 26, 2005, 02:30:16 AM
Quote from: "Whitney"
Quote from: "Anna"
Columbo--

I do not know yet how to post a quote but think they waste too much space anyway.  What few kids have granted interviews have had them twisted and have been misquoted.  They are just kids and are not accustomed to being interrogated or made to feel that they did something wrong as has happened in other interviews.  They have been harshly asked why they did not look out for their friend and things like that.  They had no idea what was going to happen. If you were 17-18 and on national media with someone badgering you as to why you did not look out for a member of your group, what exactly would you say?

Interesting that some want the kids grilled far more than the suspects.  And no, these are not stepford kids and not perfect but the sure do not go out drinking and gambling every night, either.  Just not done in this part of the country.

They are also from very privileged families, some of the most privileged in the country, some of them.  They have condos on the beach, most all homes have nice swimming pools, many private planes, etc.  Joren would not be in their league in this country.  I seriously doubt NH was very impressed with him at all, contrary to what some think.  He was younger than her for one thing and she was a very mature girl for her age.  I think she tried to be friendly and this is where it got her.  And Boyz2Men is no biggie here, either.  Doubt she would even bother to attend if they were in B'ham.  My kids wouldn't for sure.  Most of those kids also spent the entire days on the beach.  They were not some desperate gang out for any and every thrill.  I know dozens of kids just like them who do not have to have the wild stuff to have a good life.  And I don't believe any bartender can remember the exact number of drinks served to every customer like that, either.  

So as I asked before, why trash the MB kids, the victim or her family?  I believe if there were any dirt it would have come out long before now and most of what I have seen is just pure fabrication of dirt/suspicion where none exists.  Believe it or not, lots of families do not have deep dark evil secrets but even if they did, so what?  Does that mean their daughter should be made to disappear and likely killed in some horrific manner?  What am I missing here?   :shock:


Just want to quote/save this post for my own...she's special!


You make a perfect case of Joran being innocent, he is 17, and he has not confessed during interrogation...could it be that is telling the truth, for get the stories changing I can see either a panic since the next day the girl dissapeared, you can see why as story can seem like he is lying but it may have been twisted by police misinfomation and sloppy reporting of MSM?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Getagrip on June 26, 2005, 02:30:24 AM
Quote from: "CancunMole"
[SORRY RED, I don''t believe that! I BELIEVE THAT ALL OF THEM WHO WERE ON THIS TRIP WERE IN FACT GIVEN A SCRIPT TO FOLLOW.

You're entitled to your opinion, CM. But in my own estimation, that's not the case. In fact, were they to have a script, we wouldn't have found any inconsistencies amongst their statements.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: DT on June 26, 2005, 02:30:36 AM
Quote from: "AZLady"
Quote from: "CancunMole"


SORRY RED, I don''t believe that! I BELIEVE THAT ALL OF THEM WHO WERE ON THIS TRIP WERE IN FACT GIVEN A SCRIPT TO FOLLOW.


WHY?


Because he is just like every other cynical conspiracy theorist on this board, they want to believe the worst and most ridiculous things possible.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: inspector_detector on June 26, 2005, 02:31:59 AM
Quote from: "DT"
Quote from: "inspector_detector"
Quote from: "DT"
Quote from: "inspector_detector"
Quote from: "igsigs"
How can these guys hold up under such intense scrutiny and pressure? since i am too lazy to write out my whole theory on what happenned that night i thought i would just write out what specific charges the current suspects believe they would face if they told the truth.
imo

steve croes - drug dealing leading to death, obstruction

satish k. - body disposal, obstruction

deepak k. - drugs(middle man?) leading to death, body disposal, obstruction

PVDS - obstruction

JVDS - manslaughter, body disposal, obstruction.

in this scenerio, JVDS, Deepak and Croes do not talk because of the seriousness of the charges and PVDS and Satish do not talk to try and save son/brother.


Maybe it's because they're innocent? BTW why don't you list the "evidence" against them. Sorry, that was rhetorical question because there is no evidence...


Lying repeatedly is pretty good evidence against him if you ask me.  I don't know what he did, but he has something to hide otherwise he wouldn't be lying.


If everyone that ever told a lie was in jail, there would be a lot of people in jail.  :roll:


So you are telling me that his repeated lying regarding the disappearence of a missing girl is not evidence against him?  Maybe he is innocent, but his lying has killed any credibility he has and has logically made him the prime suspect in the case.


I'm saying that there is NO evidence in this case. The Aruban police should be looking for evidence, and not arresting someone's father to try to force a confession out of someone...


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: puggywug on June 26, 2005, 02:32:10 AM
Quote from: "Ladyhawke112"
Quote from: "puggywug"
Quote from: "Ladyhawke112"
Quote from: "Scott"
Quote from: "Ladyhawke112"

If he regularly does these heinous acts, as a regular, with all this worldwide publicity, wouldn't another victim have come forward by now?

Not if he strictly targeted girls who were already intoxicated, heading back to the States the next day.  A lawyer representing an American girl who was admittedly very drunk would have a rather difficult time getting a rape conviction against Joran in an Aruban court.
If there is any pattern to his behavior, I would also lean to believe that he boasts about his father's standing as a judge on island, thus further intimidating any girl who can't recall exactly what happened the previous night.

I was not talking about other victims in terms of them seeking conviction. It just seems likely if he regularly targeted intoxicated American girls leaving the next day - one of them might recognize his picture, which has been all over the news.  It seems that whether his father is a judge or just one-in-training at this point is moot, since he is also in custody. It's the perfect time for a victim of this supposed serial preditor to come forward and write the best-selling book! There hasn't been one - or even a fake one out to just make a buck - doesn't that fact strike you as interesting?

ONCE AGAIN, I repeat, how do you know no one has come forward? How would any of us know? We don't know ANY facts about the evidence because it is against Dutch law to reveal it.  Anything disclosed to the media is inadmissable in trial.   :)

Well puggywug, violated Americans, having returned home, don't have to abide by Dutch law. They can freely talk, as they should to put the guilty away. As long as the Law enforcement/prosecutors/witnesses/attorneys and anyone else on Aruba apparently doesn't talk, the case will go on.

I definately see what you're saying.  What I am saying is that maybe there are Americans allegedly violated by him who have contacted authorities and the prosecutors building the case against Joran are asking them to keep it under wraps until trial when they can testify against him to establish a pattern of behavior **IF THAT IS THE CASE - I'm not saying it is, this is totally hypothetical**  :)


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: sunmoonstars on June 26, 2005, 02:32:31 AM
Is anyone seeing the quote from the news article that I have posted twice? Some keep saying the MB students weren't asked not to speak, well according to them, they were.
Reynolds didn't elaborate, and Barron said people who went on the trip aren't publicly discussing details of what happened in Aruba at the request of Holloway's family, which fears the publicity could hamper the investigation.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Getagrip on June 26, 2005, 02:32:52 AM
Quote from: "CancunMole"
I personally question what the motives are? I have bolded my question so there is no other question about what I am asking. I'm from Maine originally and I'm sick of the BS. Dash is no more a confidant of NH than ED. Did no one else (with the replay, not get that ED deviated from the script?)

Coming back to this, can we ask what your motivations are?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: igsigs on June 26, 2005, 02:33:06 AM
Quote from: "inspector_detector"
Quote from: "DT"
Quote from: "inspector_detector"
Quote from: "igsigs"
How can these guys hold up under such intense scrutiny and pressure? since i am too lazy to write out my whole theory on what happenned that night i thought i would just write out what specific charges the current suspects believe they would face if they told the truth.
imo

steve croes - drug dealing leading to death, obstruction

satish k. - body disposal, obstruction

deepak k. - drugs(middle man?) leading to death, body disposal, obstruction

PVDS - obstruction

JVDS - manslaughter, body disposal, obstruction.

in this scenerio, JVDS, Deepak and Croes do not talk because of the seriousness of the charges and PVDS and Satish do not talk to try and save son/brother.


Maybe it's because they're innocent? BTW why don't you list the "evidence" against them. Sorry, that was rhetorical question because there is no evidence...


Lying repeatedly is pretty good evidence against him if you ask me.  I don't know what he did, but he has something to hide otherwise he wouldn't be lying.


If everyone that ever told a lie was in jail, there would be a lot of people in jail.  :roll:



Yea...but...if 5 people tell five different lies and a young girl's life is at stake - they should be in jail.


Title: Re: NH
Post by: writenow on June 26, 2005, 02:33:09 AM
Quote from: "sunmoonstars"
In regards to the MB group not talking.......here is the proof they were asked by the Holloway family not to.

Reynolds didn't elaborate, and Barron said people who went on the trip aren't publicly discussing details of what happened in Aruba at the request of Holloway's family, which fears the publicity could hamper the investigation.


No. Arlee just explained this about an hour ago (maybe more -- I've lost all concept of time). She said one paper interviewed a sophomore who didn't go on the trip and said he couldn't answer questions because he didn't go on the trip. that came out in the paper as he refused to talk because the family didn't want him to. the kids then said, "oh, they don't want us to talk? OK." and they didn't talk. But Dash's mom said the family NEVER ASKED THIS.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: AZLady on June 26, 2005, 02:34:06 AM
Quote from: "DT"
Quote from: "AZLady"
Quote from: "CancunMole"


SORRY RED, I don''t believe that! I BELIEVE THAT ALL OF THEM WHO WERE ON THIS TRIP WERE IN FACT GIVEN A SCRIPT TO FOLLOW.


WHY?


Because he is just like every other cynical conspiracy theorist on this board, they want to believe the worst and most ridiculous things possible.


That's what I thought...  Beats me why people draw conclusions based on nothing.  zip...nadda...just their own imagination and cuz it makes them feel special to talk about something "different".  Takes all kinds...


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: DT on June 26, 2005, 02:34:52 AM
Quote from: "inspector_detector"
Quote from: "DT"
Quote from: "inspector_detector"
Quote from: "DT"
Quote from: "inspector_detector"
Quote from: "igsigs"
How can these guys hold up under such intense scrutiny and pressure? since i am too lazy to write out my whole theory on what happenned that night i thought i would just write out what specific charges the current suspects believe they would face if they told the truth.
imo

steve croes - drug dealing leading to death, obstruction

satish k. - body disposal, obstruction

deepak k. - drugs(middle man?) leading to death, body disposal, obstruction

PVDS - obstruction

JVDS - manslaughter, body disposal, obstruction.

in this scenerio, JVDS, Deepak and Croes do not talk because of the seriousness of the charges and PVDS and Satish do not talk to try and save son/brother.


Maybe it's because they're innocent? BTW why don't you list the "evidence" against them. Sorry, that was rhetorical question because there is no evidence...


Lying repeatedly is pretty good evidence against him if you ask me.  I don't know what he did, but he has something to hide otherwise he wouldn't be lying.


If everyone that ever told a lie was in jail, there would be a lot of people in jail.  :roll:


So you are telling me that his repeated lying regarding the disappearence of a missing girl is not evidence against him?  Maybe he is innocent, but his lying has killed any credibility he has and has logically made him the prime suspect in the case.


I'm saying that there is NO evidence in this case. The Aruban police should be looking for evidence, and not arresting someone's father to try to force a confession out of someone...


I guess you have inside access to the Aruban LE, right? You don't know that their is no evidence. You don't know what they found in the house.  YOu don't know what they have said in interrogations.  You don't know what tips they have received.  You don't know what their searches have found.  

You don't know anything more than any of us.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: TTownMike on June 26, 2005, 02:35:48 AM
Quote from: "inspector_detector"
Quote from: "TTownMike"
Quote from: "DT"
Quote from: "coco"
DT - I think part of the questioning is that it's really rare to see a public case like this that is so completely controlled in terms of media coverage and image. Just thinking in comparison to say the Elizabeth Smart case where there were all sorts of runours and innuendoes and such - not condoning those but that's how the media operates and we don't see it here.

I also don't think....

And I think that that is part of what stirs interest in the case - we're seeing an image of acceptable or even "good" young adult behavior that is very different from the definition that many of us grew up with. This is not ... NOT ... blaming Natalee or the parents or anything like that - it's about Natalee as a symbol for a shift in our culture and how we react. These discussions are probably not meant for folks who are close to the situation itself - for you all, it's personal and about someone you know. But online, in a blog, etc it becomes also about ideas and broader cultural implications. One thing I value here is that I don't think anyone, no matter what their theory of the case, forgets that at the core is the disappearance of a lovely young woman who did not deserve whatever has happened to her - and I think we all ache for her and her family.

But you're missing the point no one is claiming anyone is perfect.  They're claiming she was a very good person with good morals.  Nothing we know yet contradicts that. We don't know how much she drank or even if she gambled.  I wouldn't be surprised if she did both of these things.  But I think that is entirely consistent with a person who has good morals.


DT, agreed!  No real evidense of any negative characteristics in Natalee! (Though some seem relentless in efforts to undermine her character)!

At the same time, Urine was seemingly "good kid"!  Im sure he has "charm" (see links around here to "psychopath") which if ya thank about it contributes to NAt being sucked in!  
And too, I see that no one seems to say that urine ha done this before.  (But who knows how close he may have come with other TARGETS?)


So just keep "Urine" and his dad in prison. And then we'll all be happy right? Since we all know he's guilty of raping and killing Natalee. The Twittys should all be happy and content and can go back home. What more could they have hoped for? :roll:


Its the LAW in Aruba that see approp. it to keep them in prison!  What we know is Urine was the last one seen with her and we know that he is lying to cover something up!  And we know she is still missing!  So, would you rather the LE back off and leave the poor little MANCHILD alone?


Title: Re: NH
Post by: sunmoonstars on June 26, 2005, 02:36:00 AM
Quote from: "writenow"
Quote from: "sunmoonstars"
In regards to the MB group not talking.......here is the proof they were asked by the Holloway family not to.

Reynolds didn't elaborate, and Barron said people who went on the trip aren't publicly discussing details of what happened in Aruba at the request of Holloway's family, which fears the publicity could hamper the investigation.


No. Arlee just explained this about an hour ago (maybe more -- I've lost all concept of time). She said one paper interviewed a sophomore who didn't go on the trip and said he couldn't answer questions because he didn't go on the trip. that came out in the paper as he refused to talk because the family didn't want him to. the kids then said, "oh, they don't want us to talk? OK." and they didn't talk. But Dash's mom said the family NEVER ASKED THIS.


I missed that, sorry. However, that was what was quoted in the newspaper. It would make perfect sense to me and maybe explain to some why they aren't blabbing everything!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Anna on June 26, 2005, 02:36:26 AM
I have seen at least one if not two of the roommates at the HI on TV, her best friend that went on the trip and the young man who saw her at C&C on TV and several others.  There are plenty of quotes in newspapers.

I think the problem is they all say she was a nice girl and did not do anything out of the ordinary on the trip, nothing noteworthy.  Now that just does not seem to be what some want to hear but if it is the truth, it just is.

They all say basically the same thing but instead of taking this to mean it is probably the truth, some seem to try to attach sinister motives to the entire senior class.  Good grief!!  Seems nothing less than some lurid tales will do but what if there just were not any to tell.  

Maybe the MB kids should make up negative things to say about her?  That sure seems to be what some want and nothing less will do but if that is the way she was, what else can they say?  Not all kids lie.

If all 140 of them said the same thing, then it would be "scripted" and not what some want to hear.  My own kids would be far too shy to go on national TV as some of these have done.  And if one of them were to so much as misspeak on one word, it would be pounced on unmercifully and far more made of it than should be.  Get your Tuesday mixed up with Wednesday and off it would all go.  They are traumatized enough as it is without adding to it some sort of media feeding frenzy.

I didn't hear anybody demanding that Baby speak to the media when he was released for a full ten days.  I wonder why no one wanted to hear his version of things straight from the horse's mouth, so to speak.  Oh, right!  His father told him to keep quiet and not say anything at all, not even to the mother of the girl he was last seen with.  Why didn't Joren go on Fox as the MB kids did and tell his version for he was released free and clear to go about his life just as though nothing had happened until his second arrest?  Did he hold any press interviews or appear on any national media?  If so, I must have missed that and can anyone provide a link to Joren's press releases for me, please?  :)


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Compananzi on June 26, 2005, 02:36:50 AM
Quote from: "CancunMole"
Quote from: "Red"
Quote from: "writenow"
Quote from: "CancunMole"
I am convinced that the "young adults", not "kids" who have appeared on National TV have a prepared "script". Therefore, therefore there should be the number of inconsistnecises we heard.


Apparently you haven't met our little Dash.

No scripts, Cancun. You're reaching here.


What many of you may not be understanding is that the AL teens that went on TV did not have scripts. Actually just the opposite that I would defer to arlee to explain if she wishes. It has been researched and backed up by calls that I have made.

Maybe the teens that everyone wants to hear from would go on the MSM shows if they were treated with respect and told the truth. These teens committed no crime yet they are sometimes given a harder time than they actual suspects in this case.

Do not confuse nervousness and bewilderment with inconsistencies.


SORRY RED, I don''t believe that! I BELIEVE THAT ALL OF THEM WHO WERE ON THIS TRIP WERE IN FACT GIVEN A SCRIPT TO FOLLOW.


Not to be the devils advocate but I bolded the qoute and would you not say those apply to the suspect as well? We judge harshly when a Young boy scared of his wits tries to hid the fact that he was with Nat...perhaps so far he does not know what happened to her?  The interogation vs the MSM that are  giving the MB students a hard time is no comparison.  In fact all the MB interviews I found it well scripted.. I know I know..its just the way it came accross..the young man on Oreilly was much better tho, but then again he actually said nice things of Joran.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: columbo on June 26, 2005, 02:37:48 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
The MB kids HAVE been quoted and on TV, in the MSM.  I don't know what you mean, I believe it is CancunMole who does not seem to ever catch the interviews.  This was a group of 140 students, not some intimate group of five or six.  I would think the vast majority of them would not be monitoring NH's movements but would be concentrating on having fun themselves.  I doubt they can remember which day they might have seen her where, etc.  Many of them might hardly know her.

But I have seen several on TV and there are articles posted in the newspapers all the time.  What exactly is it you want them to do or say?


1. What did Natalee say about Joran to her friends?
2. Did they see Joran w/Nat at the concert at the beach?
3. What time did Joran show up at C&C's?
4. Who did Natalee go to C&C's with and how did she get to C&C's?
5. What time did Natalee arrive at C&C's?
6. How much did she have to drink?
7. Were there any other people who could have slipped something in her dirnk?
8. Were the Kalpoe brothers with Joran at C&C's?
9. Where did Natalee go after the casino?
10. Did Natalee have any contact with Joran before the encounter at the casino?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Red on June 26, 2005, 02:39:02 AM
columbo

Quote
Wow.  I'm almost take offense that you would take offense at my comment!  

Why wouldn't the MB students use the MSM to get their story out? How do you know that the MSM uses SLEAZY rules?? I enjoy this website, but in all honesty, it IS a website. I'm not trying to be confrontational, but are you suggesting that this website is the end all of all news?? We have the MSM giving every account of the suspects, yet there is no word on Natalee's friend's statements in the MSM. Sorry you're so offended by my question. Geez!


Actually its a blog not a website. I understand you enjoy it, I hope so because you are here.

Columbo, how do I know the MSM uses sleazy rules? You would ask a blogger such a question. Wow. Other than they fact that most every MB parent would back me on this , they do. I know you think this is like some insignificant blog and compared to the MSM it is. However, do you know how many MSM producers have contatced us on this story? Too many. Some have been better than others. Every network including multiple ones for different shows on each network. I am not at liberty to say names as I promised them.

Please think about the question you asked because you actually answer yourself. Why wouldn't the MB teens go on the shows? Why have there been so few? Maybe (I think I would know) that they are being treated poorly. It as been referenced many times prior to tonight.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: TTownMike on June 26, 2005, 02:40:02 AM
Quote from: "Getagrip"
Quote from: "TTownMike"
If anyone thinks Jug is outta line, FERGITTABOUTIT!

LMAO! Gotta love Mike  :lol:

Totally agree with you. Although Natalee may not be his own flesh and blood daughter, Jug sees the pain and torture his wife is going through and is acting as her protector.


Uh, well, Hello!?  He is in fack her stepdad!  And being such, would he serve the position better if he jes didnt givea sh__?  Sotaspeak!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: inspector_detector on June 26, 2005, 02:41:18 AM
Goodnight monkeys. Don't be TOO nice... :wink:


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: nikkibnurse on June 26, 2005, 02:41:21 AM
ok, in order as to not tick off the powers that be :wink: , i will not quote Anna's entire post..But, I want to say that her take on things, and her level of intelligence  IMHO, is right on the money!! Good job Anna! Very elequently "spoken"..


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Getagrip on June 26, 2005, 02:41:43 AM
Quote from: "TTownMike"
Sotaspeak!

^5 Mike!

Latest on Rheil World View (going to read now):
http://www.riehlworldview.com/carnivorous_conservative/


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Sobelle on June 26, 2005, 02:42:06 AM
Inspector_Detector said:
I'm saying that there is NO evidence in this case. The Aruban police should be looking for evidence, and not arresting someone's father to try to force a confession out of someone...

Well said, Inspector!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: AZLady on June 26, 2005, 02:42:18 AM
Quote from: "Compananzi"
Not to be the devils advocate but I bolded the qoute and would you not say those apply to the suspect as well? We judge harshly when a Young boy scared of his wits tries to hid the fact that he was with Nat...perhaps so far he does not know what happened to her?  The interogation vs the MSM that are  giving the MB students a hard time is no comparison.  In fact all the MB interviews I found it well scripted.. I know I know..its just the way it came accross..the young man on Oreilly was much better tho, but then again he actually said nice things of Joran.


a Young boy scared of his wits tries to hid the fact that he was with Nat...  Excuse me, but quite a few people saw him with Natalee.  He isn't trying to hide the fact that he left with her--he's trying to hide what he did with her after he left!  You're not being a devil's advocate--you're trying to excuse the inexcusable.


Title: Bumping my previous post
Post by: GuyWdog on June 26, 2005, 02:42:32 AM
Maybe we could post this as a poll for everyone to choose whcih scenario they best think has happened.

Run-A-Way Tourist -5%-(my Prayers are for this one)
Kidnapping-10%
Murder-10%-(Drugged sexually assaulted death)
Drugged then succumbed-10%-(perscription drug interaction with alcohol)
Drugged then Murdered-2%
Accidential Death no one involved-25%-(drowned after she left Joran)
Accidential Death Joran involved-36%-(She resisted advances then accident)
Human Trafficing-2%-



This is just my opinion. No facts support these theories. What are your Scenarios and percentages?

GuyWdog


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: dragonfly on June 26, 2005, 02:42:38 AM
The MB students probably did SOUND scripted.  Wouldn't you if you had been in a position to have to defend yourself over and over for weeks while people on websites like these and on MSM were asking things like "Why didn't her friends stop her?", "Were they all drunk?", "Where were the chaperones?".  They may not have been in an interrogation room with police officers, but I'm sure they have all been questioned repeatedly and I know they have all been accused of not taking care of Natalee like they should.  So, yes, they may have sounded a little scripted and defensive, but I understand why.  Amazing though, there stories have remained the same.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: TTownMike on June 26, 2005, 02:42:48 AM
Quote from: "puggywug"
Quote from: "inspector_detector"
So just keep "Urine" and his dad in prison. And then we'll all be happy right? Since we all know he's guilty of raping and killing Natalee. The Twittys should all be happy and content and can go back home. What more could they have hoped for? :roll:

That none of this tragedy had ever occured and their daughter was at home, safe and sound??? :roll:


Tellem boutit puggywuggy!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: AZLady on June 26, 2005, 02:44:22 AM
Quote from: "columbo

1. What did Natalee say about Joran to her friends?
2. Did they see Joran w/Nat at the concert at the beach?
3. What time did Joran show up at C&C's?
4. Who did Natalee go to C&C's with and how did she get to C&C's?
5. What time did Natalee arrive at C&C's?
6. How much did she have to drink?
7. Were there any other people who could have slipped something in her dirnk?
8. Were the Kalpoe brothers with Joran at C&C's?
9. Where did Natalee go after the casino?
10. Did Natalee have any contact with Joran before the encounter at the casino?


I am sure the FBI and the Aruban authorities have these answers and many more.  We have been told by the Aruban authorities to be patient.  Why can't you listen to the people in charge of the investigation on the island?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: DT on June 26, 2005, 02:44:25 AM
Quote from: "Sobelle"
Inspector_Detector said:
I'm saying that there is NO evidence in this case. The Aruban police should be looking for evidence, and not arresting someone's father to try to force a confession out of someone...

Well said, Inspector!


Yes well said.  You certainly know for sure that their is no evidence in this case given that the police force has been completely silent in regards to evidence and leads, and I'm happy to see that Sobelle can recoqnize this as well.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Whitney on June 26, 2005, 02:44:34 AM
Quote from: "Compananzi"
Quote from: "Whitney"
Quote from: "Anna"
Columbo--

I do not know yet how to post a quote but think they waste too much space anyway.  What few kids have granted interviews have had them twisted and have been misquoted.  They are just kids and are not accustomed to being interrogated or made to feel that they did something wrong as has happened in other interviews.  They have been harshly asked why they did not look out for their friend and things like that.  They had no idea what was going to happen. If you were 17-18 and on national media with someone badgering you as to why you did not look out for a member of your group, what exactly would you say?

Interesting that some want the kids grilled far more than the suspects.  And no, these are not stepford kids and not perfect but the sure do not go out drinking and gambling every night, either.  Just not done in this part of the country.

They are also from very privileged families, some of the most privileged in the country, some of them.  They have condos on the beach, most all homes have nice swimming pools, many private planes, etc.  Joren would not be in their league in this country.  I seriously doubt NH was very impressed with him at all, contrary to what some think.  He was younger than her for one thing and she was a very mature girl for her age.  I think she tried to be friendly and this is where it got her.  And Boyz2Men is no biggie here, either.  Doubt she would even bother to attend if they were in B'ham.  My kids wouldn't for sure.  Most of those kids also spent the entire days on the beach.  They were not some desperate gang out for any and every thrill.  I know dozens of kids just like them who do not have to have the wild stuff to have a good life.  And I don't believe any bartender can remember the exact number of drinks served to every customer like that, either.  

So as I asked before, why trash the MB kids, the victim or her family?  I believe if there were any dirt it would have come out long before now and most of what I have seen is just pure fabrication of dirt/suspicion where none exists.  Believe it or not, lots of families do not have deep dark evil secrets but even if they did, so what?  Does that mean their daughter should be made to disappear and likely killed in some horrific manner?  What am I missing here?   :shock:


Just want to quote/save this post for my own...she's special!


You make a perfect case of Joran being innocent, he is 17, and he has not confessed during interrogation...could it be that is telling the truth, for get the stories changing I can see either a panic since the next day the girl dissapeared, you can see why as story can seem like he is lying but it may have been twisted by police misinfomation and sloppy reporting of MSM?


...oh yeah, Compananzi...cut to the chase...the law (NL, Aruba) favors the defendent:  no body...only ONE has been convicted of murder...is that how you spell it?  murrrrderrr?....(toss the hair...)...I understand...my daughter, if not found...and Joran and his Vater may go free...


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: sunmoonstars on June 26, 2005, 02:44:55 AM
I happen to have a 17 yr old daughter that graduated this year. Personally, I would not have allowed her to go on a trip like this. Heck, I wouldn't allow her to go to Galveston after Prom like many of the seniors did. So, although Natalee seems to be by all accounts much like my daughter...I know girls talk! They talk about boys, who was with who, what they were wearing, etc. So, while I have the greatest of compassion and sympathy for the MB group.......I know teenagers. The things they did, saw and discussed could answer alot of unanswered questions.
Respectfully,

Another teens mom


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: iquitos on June 26, 2005, 02:45:21 AM
Quote from: "Compananzi"
Quote from: "Whitney"
Quote from: "Anna"
Columbo--

I do not know yet how to post a quote but think they waste too much space anyway.  What few kids have granted interviews have had them twisted and have been misquoted.  They are just kids and are not accustomed to being interrogated or made to feel that they did something wrong as has happened in other interviews.  They have been harshly asked why they did not look out for their friend and things like that.  They had no idea what was going to happen. If you were 17-18 and on national media with someone badgering you as to why you did not look out for a member of your group, what exactly would you say?

Interesting that some want the kids grilled far more than the suspects.  And no, these are not stepford kids and not perfect but the sure do not go out drinking and gambling every night, either.  Just not done in this part of the country.

They are also from very privileged families, some of the most privileged in the country, some of them.  They have condos on the beach, most all homes have nice swimming pools, many private planes, etc.  Joren would not be in their league in this country.  I seriously doubt NH was very impressed with him at all, contrary to what some think.  He was younger than her for one thing and she was a very mature girl for her age.  I think she tried to be friendly and this is where it got her.  And Boyz2Men is no biggie here, either.  Doubt she would even bother to attend if they were in B'ham.  My kids wouldn't for sure.  Most of those kids also spent the entire days on the beach.  They were not some desperate gang out for any and every thrill.  I know dozens of kids just like them who do not have to have the wild stuff to have a good life.  And I don't believe any bartender can remember the exact number of drinks served to every customer like that, either.  

So as I asked before, why trash the MB kids, the victim or her family?  I believe if there were any dirt it would have come out long before now and most of what I have seen is just pure fabrication of dirt/suspicion where none exists.  Believe it or not, lots of families do not have deep dark evil secrets but even if they did, so what?  Does that mean their daughter should be made to disappear and likely killed in some horrific manner?  What am I missing here?   :shock:


Just want to quote/save this post for my own...she's special!


You make a perfect case of Joran being innocent, he is 17, and he has not confessed during interrogation...could it be that is telling the truth, for get the stories changing I can see either a panic since the next day the girl dissapeared, you can see why as story can seem like he is lying but it may have been twisted by police misinfomation and sloppy reporting of MSM?
 

sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander. or is it as alike as a jug and a jar?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Compananzi on June 26, 2005, 02:45:59 AM
Quote from: "columbo"
Quote from: "Anna"
The MB kids HAVE been quoted and on TV, in the MSM.  I don't know what you mean, I believe it is CancunMole who does not seem to ever catch the interviews.  This was a group of 140 students, not some intimate group of five or six.  I would think the vast majority of them would not be monitoring NH's movements but would be concentrating on having fun themselves.  I doubt they can remember which day they might have seen her where, etc.  Many of them might hardly know her.

But I have seen several on TV and there are articles posted in the newspapers all the time.  What exactly is it you want them to do or say?


1. What did Natalee say about Joran to her friends? He' s different from the guys I ve met

2. Did they see Joran w/Nat at the concert at the beach? I dont think they ever said that ..SBF was off the radar for all intent and purpose..still a place of potential alcohol and drugs..reggea you know..

3. What time did Joran show up at C&C's? It must have been 12 or 12.30

4. Who did Natalee go to C&C's with and how did she get to C&C's? some 40 MBers, and taxi I guess

5. What time did Natalee arrive at C&C's? [Probably 12 or sooner

6. How much did she have to drink? 2 drinks..or 2 yards, charlies famous drink. Search webshots, for charlies in aruba..its a hoot..Wild wild wild..

7. Were there any other people who could have slipped something in her dirnk? Speculation..but 2 drugs keep repeating GBH and X


8. Were the Kalpoe brothers with Joran at C&C's? Yes
9. Where did Natalee go after the casino? Youd think CnC

10. Did Natalee have any contact with Joran before the encounter at the casino?
Probably

Hmm. those are good question to start tho..


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: puggywug on June 26, 2005, 02:46:02 AM
Quote from: "Sobelle"
Inspector_Detector said:
I'm saying that there is NO evidence in this case. The Aruban police should be looking for evidence, and not arresting someone's father to try to force a confession out of someone...
Well said, Inspector!

Wait, you're forgetting something.  The authorities cannot reveal what evidence they have or it would be deemed INADMISSABLE in trial.  Sheesh.  How many times do we have to go over this?  We are ALL speculating, every single one of us here.  No one is RIGHT and no one is WRONG.  But one thing is probably wrong to assume (you know what they say about "assuming") is that the Aruban authorities have no evidence.   :)


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: CancunMole on June 26, 2005, 02:46:32 AM
Quote from: "AZLady"
Quote from: "CancunMole


I may be behind because of my dial up connection but believe me, I'm not BEHIND. This girl's mother has from the get go been IMOO, been beyond involvement. I personally question what the motives are? I have bolded my question so there is no other question about what I am asking. I'm from Maine originally and I'm sick of the BS. Dash is no more a confidant of NH than ED. Did no one else (with the replay, not get that ED deviated from the script?)


Cancun, the motives are a mother's love for her daughter!  I bolded the answer so there is no doubt about the answer.  I am a mother of a 21 year old, and I would do the same.  When I mentioned to my daughter that I admired Beth H. Twitty for her strength in the face of incredible pain, my daughter said "Mom, you would do the same!"


I too am a mother. I have two sons, I have exposed my sons beyond the "norm" of America. I have allowed them to drink, in our home at meals and on trips. I have allowed them to gamble (you can see my thoughts by SEARCH id interested, and I've taught them to respect others.  My children know how to act/behave when they leave the country.

JUu said his kids had gone  3 years ago and had told him about Aruba. So why let NH go? When any parent has information, don't blame.. PLEASE KNOW THAT AS A MOTHER, I WANT THIS YOUNG GIRL TO COME HOME but don't blame a country for something that can't be fixed.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: puggywug on June 26, 2005, 02:47:25 AM
Quote from: "dragonfly"
The MB students probably did SOUND scripted.  Wouldn't you if you had been in a position to have to defend yourself over and over for weeks while people on websites like these and on MSM were asking things like "Why didn't her friends stop her?", "Were they all drunk?", "Where were the chaperones?".  They may not have been in an interrogation room with police officers, but I'm sure they have all been questioned repeatedly and I know they have all been accused of not taking care of Natalee like they should.  So, yes, they may have sounded a little scripted and defensive, but I understand why.  Amazing though, there stories have remained the same.

Great explanation, dragonfly!  :)


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: MsPooh on June 26, 2005, 02:47:56 AM
Quote from: "TTownMike"
Quote from: "puggywug"
Quote from: "inspector_detector"
So just keep "Urine" and his dad in prison. And then we'll all be happy right? Since we all know he's guilty of raping and killing Natalee. The Twittys should all be happy and content and can go back home. What more could they have hoped for? :roll:

That none of this tragedy had ever occured and their daughter was at home, safe and sound??? :roll:


Tellem boutit puggywuggy!


All I can ask to these ppl knocking the parents is..do you have kids yourselves? I do and bet that if God forbid something like this happened to one of my kids I would move hell or high water,  find money that I didn't know that I had to pay ransom,knock whatever heads together I had to to get to the truth...dayum staight the parents are mad as hell...they are being railroaded and having to do alot of the investigation on their own.Hopping off my soapbox..'tis getting so very late..


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: TTownMike on June 26, 2005, 02:48:02 AM
Quote from: "inspector_detector"
Quote from: "igsigs"
How can these guys hold up under such intense scrutiny and pressure? since i am too lazy to write out my whole theory on what happenned that night i thought i would just write out what specific charges the current suspects believe they would face if they told the truth.
imo

steve croes - drug dealing leading to death, obstruction

satish k. - body disposal, obstruction

deepak k. - drugs(middle man?) leading to death, body disposal, obstruction

PVDS - obstruction

JVDS - manslaughter, body disposal, obstruction.

in this scenerio, JVDS, Deepak and Croes do not talk because of the seriousness of the charges and PVDS and Satish do not talk to try and save son/brother.


Maybe it's because they're innocent? BTW why don't you list the "evidence" against them. Sorry, that was rhetorical question because there is no evidence...


Well, I guess I gotta agree witchu!  IMPLICATIONS? YEP! LIES? YEP!  EVIDENCE? SOME!  But I reckon, since they ain't got it all THEY SHOULD LETTEM ALL GO!!!!!!!!!! Am I follerin ya right here?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: nikkibnurse on June 26, 2005, 02:49:22 AM
G'night monkey friends...hope one of you guys solves this thing by the time i wake up in the morning..have a good night!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: dragonfly on June 26, 2005, 02:49:57 AM
Quote from: "nikkibnurse"
G'night monkey friends...hope one of you guys solves this thing by the time i wake up in the morning..have a good night!


Night Nikki... :D


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Whitney on June 26, 2005, 02:50:19 AM
Quote from: "iquitos"
Quote from: "Compananzi"
Quote from: "Whitney"
Quote from: "Anna"
Columbo--

I do not know yet how to post a quote but think they waste too much space anyway.  What few kids have granted interviews have had them twisted and have been misquoted.  They are just kids and are not accustomed to being interrogated or made to feel that they did something wrong as has happened in other interviews.  They have been harshly asked why they did not look out for their friend and things like that.  They had no idea what was going to happen. If you were 17-18 and on national media with someone badgering you as to why you did not look out for a member of your group, what exactly would you say?

Interesting that some want the kids grilled far more than the suspects.  And no, these are not stepford kids and not perfect but the sure do not go out drinking and gambling every night, either.  Just not done in this part of the country.

They are also from very privileged families, some of the most privileged in the country, some of them.  They have condos on the beach, most all homes have nice swimming pools, many private planes, etc.  Joren would not be in their league in this country.  I seriously doubt NH was very impressed with him at all, contrary to what some think.  He was younger than her for one thing and she was a very mature girl for her age.  I think she tried to be friendly and this is where it got her.  And Boyz2Men is no biggie here, either.  Doubt she would even bother to attend if they were in B'ham.  My kids wouldn't for sure.  Most of those kids also spent the entire days on the beach.  They were not some desperate gang out for any and every thrill.  I know dozens of kids just like them who do not have to have the wild stuff to have a good life.  And I don't believe any bartender can remember the exact number of drinks served to every customer like that, either.  

So as I asked before, why trash the MB kids, the victim or her family?  I believe if there were any dirt it would have come out long before now and most of what I have seen is just pure fabrication of dirt/suspicion where none exists.  Believe it or not, lots of families do not have deep dark evil secrets but even if they did, so what?  Does that mean their daughter should be made to disappear and likely killed in some horrific manner?  What am I missing here?   :shock:


Just want to quote/save this post for my own...she's special!


You make a perfect case of Joran being innocent, he is 17, and he has not confessed during interrogation...could it be that is telling the truth, for get the stories changing I can see either a panic since the next day the girl dissapeared, you can see why as story can seem like he is lying but it may have been twisted by police misinfomation and sloppy reporting of MSM?
 

sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander. or is it as alike as a jug and a jar?


Ok you feeking Judges...make a choice...we're really disliking your opinions:..."well, because of this...or because of that...."


know what I mean?!!!

give us your opinion!...or we're going to be forced to go with Paulus Van Der Sloot...

...you think?  what's your name?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Getagrip on June 26, 2005, 02:50:28 AM
Quote from: "Red"
Actually its a blog not a website. I understand you enjoy it, I hope so because you are here.

Numbers do not lie. We are here because this is compelling, in a way that the MSM could not even deam of.

As far as I'm concerned, you're making history here. Similar to Matt Drudge, but not so similar because this is not a political matter. The human interest factor, and the search for truth and justice have made this blog and its associated message board most compelling, and imo, instrumental to getting to the bottom of things.

It's probably not mentioned enough...but THANK YOU for working so diligently on behalf of Natalee, and for giving us a voice in the matter.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: NoDumbBunny on June 26, 2005, 02:51:30 AM
'evening all....


I have a question - and I tried to see if it was already answered - so I'm posting it with apologies in advance if it's a "re-winder"  :)

Is it the Marriott that is being remodeled or the Allegro?
The Allegro's website says it is closed until December - anyone heard of LE or searchers looking through all the empty guest rooms?

::shrugging::   Just a thought


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Kkial on June 26, 2005, 02:52:35 AM
I'm saying that there is NO evidence in this case. The Aruban police should be looking for evidence, and not arresting someone's father to try to force a confession out of someone...[/quote]

Inspectot Clusoe,,,how do you know there is no EVIDENCE in this case??
Dutch Law prohibits releasing information,,,even the defense does not have what the LE has now..They will get it right before the charges, if there are any charges.....We still don't know whether they have confessed or not..hopefully they have....................or Joran will not have a tongue to confess


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: writenow on June 26, 2005, 02:52:36 AM
Quote from: "Sobelle"
Inspector_Detector said:
I'm saying that there is NO evidence in this case. The Aruban police should be looking for evidence, and not arresting someone's father to try to force a confession out of someone...

Well said, Inspector!


You both know nothing! You don't know what evidence the police have or don't have. YOU KNOW NOTHING. The LE obviously from surveillance, taped phone calls, phone and cell records, computers, forensic evidence in cars/clothes/property combined with 5 people who keep changing their stories [lying lying lying] know that all adds up to a whole lotta guilt and suspicion for some reason.

My guess is they do have evidence in this case. But I don't know either. No one does. AND YOU DON'T EITHER.

Let the Aruban and Dutch authorities do their job. I know the van der Sloots and the Kalpoes have friends and family posting. That's noble to defend them. But this case is by no means over. And just because you want your friends released from jail doesn't mean the police don't have evidence.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: igsigs on June 26, 2005, 02:52:44 AM
Quote from: "Sobelle"
Inspector_Detector said:
I'm saying that there is NO evidence in this case. The Aruban police should be looking for evidence, and not arresting someone's father to try to force a confession out of someone...

Well said, Inspector!


Well said? Well said? The Inspector saying that there is NO evidence in this case is equal to me saying that LE has a wiretap of PVDS telling all the suspects to not reveal where the body is hidden. we would both be full of it.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: dragonfly on June 26, 2005, 02:52:47 AM
Quote from: "NoDumbBunny"
'evening all....


I have a question - and I tried to see if it was already answered - so I'm posting it with apologies in advance if it's a "re-winder"  :)

Is it the Marriott that is being remodeled or the Allegro?
The Allegro's website says it is closed until December - anyone heard of LE or searchers looking through all the empty guest rooms?

::shrugging::   Just a thought


IF I am correct, it is the Allegro and it was searched in the early days of the investigation while the 2 security guards were being detained.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: sunmoonstars on June 26, 2005, 02:53:53 AM
All I can ask to these ppl knocking the parents is..do you have kids yourselves? I do and bet that if God forbid something like this happened to one of my kids I would move hell or high water,  find money that I didn't know that I had to pay ransom,knock whatever heads together I had to to get to the truth...dayum staight the parents are mad as hell...they are being railroaded and having to do alot of the investigation on their own.Hopping off my soapbox..'tis getting so very late..[/quote]

I totally agree with you that I would do Whatever it took to find my girl! As for the drinking, partying, etc. you wouldn't believe how many people in my "upper class" neighborhood hold parties at their houses for 15-18 yr olds. Loaded with kegs and any other liquor they desire to bring. I find it unbelievable that parents would take it upon themselves to give anyone else's child alcohol. God help the one that gives it to mine without my permission! So, whatever happend in Aruba as far as partying happens here every weekend. Just go to myspace and look by area....tx....it will shock you what these kids are doing in their parents homes. Sex is the norm and like I said, this is with parents in the home when it happens.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: GuyWdog on June 26, 2005, 02:55:02 AM
The TRUTH will be written down by a Man writing it all down in a book somewhere into the future. Only God knows what happened that night, and he isn't talking.
 My guess is that without a Corpus Delecti the Police will continue to hold Joran and the others until such time as they find Natalee, or they have to either Formally charge them or either let them go. I believe that is at 160 days.
 


G-night all

GuyWdoggy


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: puggywug on June 26, 2005, 02:55:31 AM
Quote from: "Getagrip"
Quote from: "Red"
Actually its a blog not a website. I understand you enjoy it, I hope so because you are here.

Numbers do not lie. We are here because this is compelling, in a way that the MSM could not even deam of.

As far as I'm concerned, you're making history here. Similar to Matt Drudge, but not so similar because this is not a political matter. The human interest factor, and the search for truth and justice have made this blog and its associated message board most compelling, and imo, instrumental to getting to the bottom of things.

It's probably not mentioned enough...but THANK YOU for working so diligently on behalf of Natalee, and for giving us a voice in the matter.

HERE, HERE!  ::Cheers::  :D


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Getagrip on June 26, 2005, 02:55:49 AM
Quote from: "writenow"
Let the authorities do their job. I know van der Sloots and the Kalpoes have friends and family posting. That's noble to defend them. But this case is by no means over. And just because you want your friends released from jail doesn't mean the police don't have evidence.

Well said, writenow. Didn't want to quote the whole post, but agree on all counts.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: AZLady on June 26, 2005, 02:57:02 AM
Quote from: "CancunMole"
Quote from: "AZLady"
Quote from: "CancunMole


I may be behind because of my dial up connection but believe me, I'm not BEHIND. This girl's mother has from the get go been IMOO, been beyond involvement. I personally question what the motives are? I have bolded my question so there is no other question about what I am asking. I'm from Maine originally and I'm sick of the BS. Dash is no more a confidant of NH than ED. Did no one else (with the replay, not get that ED deviated from the script?)


Cancun, the motives are a mother's love for her daughter!  I bolded the answer so there is no doubt about the answer.  I am a mother of a 21 year old, and I would do the same.  When I mentioned to my daughter that I admired Beth H. Twitty for her strength in the face of incredible pain, my daughter said "Mom, you would do the same!"


I too am a mother. I have two sons, I have exposed my sons beyond the "norm" of America. I have allowed them to drink, in our home at meals and on trips. I have allowed them to gamble (you can see my thoughts by SEARCH id interested, and I've taught them to respect others.  My children know how to act/behave when they leave the country.

JUu said his kids had gone  3 years ago and had told him about Aruba. So why let NH go? When any parent has information, don't blame.. PLEASE KNOW THAT AS A MOTHER, I WANT THIS YOUNG GIRL TO COME HOME but don't blame a country for something that can't be fixed.


Cancun, unless I misunderstand, you asked what Beth's motives are.  I understood you to mean regarding her involvement in finding her daughter.  You wrote: This girl's mother has from the get go been IMOO, been beyond involvement.  I responded with the reason for Beth's involvement.  It seemed fairly clear to me.

You are mixing this in with your demands to question the MB kids.  Now you respond with telling us about your own kids, and how you've raised them.  I don't get what you are trying to say.  I'm sorry, but it just doesn't fit together, and I don't know how to have a conversation with you regarding this.  Are you trying to throw mud at the Holloways and the MB kids and hope some sticks?  Why would you want to do that?

No one "blame a country for something that can't be fixed."  I do not blame Aruba.  No one here blames Aruba.  No one here is that small-minded.  We are fixing our blame right where it belongs--with the people in jail.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: NoDumbBunny on June 26, 2005, 02:57:10 AM
Might be worth another look - sometimes things are so in your face you can't see them....

Case in point:  those 3 little boys in NJ in that car trunk.... only yards away from home....  <sniff sniff>  how sad.... :(


Title: allegro being remodeled
Post by: iquitos on June 26, 2005, 02:58:31 AM
allegro being remodeled  they searched it early on  one of the first searche when they were grilling the guards.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: TTownMike on June 26, 2005, 02:58:38 AM
Quote from: "CancunMole"
Quote from: "Red"
Quote from: "writenow"
Quote from: "CancunMole"
I am convinced that the "young adults", not "kids" who have appeared on National TV have a prepared "script". Therefore, therefore there should be the number of inconsistnecises we heard.


Apparently you haven't met our little Dash.

No scripts, Cancun. You're reaching here.


What many of you may not be understanding is that the AL teens that went on TV did not have scripts. Actually just the opposite that I would defer to arlee to explain if she wishes. It has been researched and backed up by calls that I have made.

Maybe the teens that everyone wants to hear from would go on the MSM shows if they were treated with respect and told the truth. These teens committed no crime yet they are sometimes given a harder time than they actual suspects in this case.

Do not confuse nervousness and bewilderment with inconsistencies.


SORRY RED, I don''t believe that! I BELIEVE THAT ALL OF THEM WHO WERE ON THIS TRIP WERE IN FACT GIVEN A SCRIPT TO FOLLOW.

LOL! ROFLMAO!  cancun?????  SEEK TREATMENT!  NOW!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Whitney on June 26, 2005, 03:00:14 AM
Quote from: "sunmoonstars"
I happen to have a 17 yr old daughter that graduated this year. Personally, I would not have allowed her to go on a trip like this. Heck, I wouldn't allow her to go to Galveston after Prom like many of the seniors did. So, although Natalee seems to be by all accounts much like my daughter...I know girls talk! They talk about boys, who was with who, what they were wearing, etc. So, while I have the greatest of compassion and sympathy for the MB group.......I know teenagers. The things they did, saw and discussed could answer alot of unanswered questions.
Respectfully,

Another teens mom
sunmoonstarsgosh I hear you...may I suggest you vote Republican in the next general election and just ask yourself: do you want GERALDO or someone like Barbara Boxer speaking for you?...

Me neither...I've barely been able to read this paragraph and type this HTML...I came up under the Johnson administration's give anyone of color a job or a student placement.  LOL...and now I'm a doctor...not sayin' I got "mine"...[/b]


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Getagrip on June 26, 2005, 03:00:59 AM
ROFL Mike!  No further comment  :lol:

Puggy, glad for the support. Some people seem to lose sight of the main issue here.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: puggywug on June 26, 2005, 03:02:02 AM
Quote from: "Getagrip"
ROFL Mike!  No further comment  :lol:

Puggy, glad for the support. Some people seem to lose sight of the main issue here.

Anytime.  I try to stay positive and support what matters.
G'Nite, Monkeys!  It's been real.
Later, taters  :D


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: AZLady on June 26, 2005, 03:02:16 AM
Mike--you do have a way with words! [admiringly] :roll:


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Getagrip on June 26, 2005, 03:02:39 AM
Sweet dreams, Puggy!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: pybird on June 26, 2005, 03:02:56 AM
Quote from: "puggywug"
Quote from: "Sobelle"
Inspector_Detector said:
I'm saying that there is NO evidence in this case. The Aruban police should be looking for evidence, and not arresting someone's father to try to force a confession out of someone...
Well said, Inspector!

Wait, you're forgetting something.  The authorities cannot reveal what evidence they have or it would be deemed INADMISSABLE in trial.  Sheesh.  How many times do we have to go over this?  We are ALL speculating, every single one of us here.  No one is RIGHT and no one is WRONG.  But one thing is probably wrong to assume (you know what they say about "assuming") is that the Aruban authorities have no evidence.   :)


Exactly, pug.  We do not know the evidence.  I have so many thoughts running thru my mind, and I just sit on my fingers because we do not have the evidence.

I still wonder about Croes and the Kalpoe's.  I know the Kalpoe brothers provided a lift to ???  I have not a clue about Croes.  Possibly...possibly he had access to a boat.

Drugs...middle man...etc...all speculation at this point.

Like you said, pug...we do not know the evidence.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Anna on June 26, 2005, 03:03:03 AM
Quote from: "iquitos"
Quote from: "Compananzi"
Quote from: "Whitney"
Quote from: "Anna"
Columbo--

I do not know yet how to post a quote but think they waste too much space anyway.  What few kids have granted interviews have had them twisted and have been misquoted.  They are just kids and are not accustomed to being interrogated or made to feel that they did something wrong as has happened in other interviews.  They have been harshly asked why they did not look out for their friend and things like that.  They had no idea what was going to happen. If you were 17-18 and on national media with someone badgering you as to why you did not look out for a member of your group, what exactly would you say?

Interesting that some want the kids grilled far more than the suspects.  And no, these are not stepford kids and not perfect but the sure do not go out drinking and gambling every night, either.  Just not done in this part of the country.

They are also from very privileged families, some of the most privileged in the country, some of them.  They have condos on the beach, most all homes have nice swimming pools, many private planes, etc.  Joren would not be in their league in this country.  I seriously doubt NH was very impressed with him at all, contrary to what some think.  He was younger than her for one thing and she was a very mature girl for her age.  I think she tried to be friendly and this is where it got her.  And Boyz2Men is no biggie here, either.  Doubt she would even bother to attend if they were in B'ham.  My kids wouldn't for sure.  Most of those kids also spent the entire days on the beach.  They were not some desperate gang out for any and every thrill.  I know dozens of kids just like them who do not have to have the wild stuff to have a good life.  And I don't believe any bartender can remember the exact number of drinks served to every customer like that, either.  

So as I asked before, why trash the MB kids, the victim or her family?  I believe if there were any dirt it would have come out long before now and most of what I have seen is just pure fabrication of dirt/suspicion where none exists.  Believe it or not, lots of families do not have deep dark evil secrets but even if they did, so what?  Does that mean their daughter should be made to disappear and likely killed in some horrific manner?  What am I missing here?   :shock:


Just want to quote/save this post for my own...she's special!


You make a perfect case of Joran being innocent, he is 17, and he has not confessed during interrogation...could it be that is telling the truth, for get the stories changing I can see either a panic since the next day the girl dissapeared, you can see why as story can seem like he is lying but it may have been twisted by police misinfomation and sloppy reporting of MSM?
 

sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander. or is it as alike as a jug and a jar?


It surely is so where were all the media interrogations of Joren during his ten days of freedom?  I do not recall even once his being under the glare of the lights, etc.  Nope, not once.  Please send me links to all of his press conferences for my edification in this regard for I some how missed all of them.  Did he do Greta and Fox News or just the local papers as the MB kids have done?

Yes, indeedy, sauce for the goose/gander would be a wonderful thing.  But we do not know if he has confessed or not or who has said what, do we?  If one confessed, being that they have changed their story about three times, I think I would wait to hear what the others might come up with before making any drastic announcements to the world.  Besides, I think it is against Dutch law to tell if he confesses, could jeopardize the whole case.

No body, no conviction?  We will have to see about that but the fact of the matter is, he admits to being with the girl at the time she disappeared.  No, I do not think that is enough to convict him or anybody and it will not.  Unless there is more evidence, he would walk on that but how do you knnow forensics did not turn up more, resulting in the detention of the father?  

Nothing will bring back their daughter but I would like the parents to at least have some level of justice in this.  That would mean a conviction of the guilty party or parties, whomever they might be.  Even if it is the Police Chief's "best friend's son" as he described Joren in the beginning just before having to rearrest him.  

The guilty parties and only the guilty parties, please.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: sunmoonstars on June 26, 2005, 03:03:10 AM
Whitney I already vote Republican.  :D The point I am trying to make here is that this is not an Aruban problem.....it is a whole generation problem! Parents are afraid to be parents IMHO, they want to be friends to their kids!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Bamagal73 on June 26, 2005, 03:03:41 AM
Okey I just got home from work, and It's gonna take me an eternity to catch up on all the posts.  Can someone fill me in on any news from today?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: AZLady on June 26, 2005, 03:03:52 AM
I'm outta here..

Time for my midnight snack and beddy-bye.  Let's pray for good news tomorrow.  Night all...


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Sobelle on June 26, 2005, 03:04:02 AM
Quote from: "puggywug"
Quote from: "Sobelle"
Inspector_Detector said:
I'm saying that there is NO evidence in this case. The Aruban police should be looking for evidence, and not arresting someone's father to try to force a confession out of someone...
Well said, Inspector!

Wait, you're forgetting something.  The authorities cannot reveal what evidence they have or it would be deemed INADMISSABLE in trial.  Sheesh.  How many times do we have to go over this?  We are ALL speculating, every single one of us here.  No one is RIGHT and no one is WRONG.  But one thing is probably wrong to assume (you know what they say about "assuming") is that the Aruban authorities have no evidence.   :)


You are right that the evidence can't be revealed.  I'm just not keen on the Justice Minister alluding to the fact that PVD was arrested to force a confession out of Juron.  That just didn't sit right with me so that's why I agreed with what the Inspector_Detector said.  Maybe it's a normal tatic in police interrogation, but it just bothered me.  Yep, I also know what they say about "assuming" too.   Off Topic:  Your little pug is cute.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: CancunMole on June 26, 2005, 03:05:23 AM
Quote from: "Red"
Quote from: "writenow"
Quote from: "CancunMole"
I am convinced that the "young adults", not "kids" who have appeared on National TV have a prepared "script". Therefore, therefore there should be the number of inconsistnecises we heard.


Apparently you haven't met our little Dash.

No scripts, Cancun. You're reaching here.


What many of you may not be understanding is that the AL teens that went on TV did not have scripts. Actually just the opposite that I would defer to arlee to explain if she wishes. It has been researched and backed up by calls that I have made.

Maybe the teens that everyone wants to hear from would go on the MSM shows if they were treated with respect and told the truth. These teens committed no crime yet they are sometimes given a harder time than they actual suspects in this case.

Do not confuse nervousness and bewilderment with inconsistencies.


Delayed reaction; Right. Not only have I listened to Dash/Alana  (see my previous comments on ED) put I've watched the frantic postings of her mother, first as arbeej and now as arlee. I this a frantic mmother attempting recognition for her daughter? I don't know about the rest of you, but having tutored someone inCalculsuor anyhting else, never made me someoon's "closee friend". you?


Title: Re: NH
Post by: Whitney on June 26, 2005, 03:05:50 AM
Quote from: "writenow"
Quote from: "sunmoonstars"
In regards to the MB group not talking.......here is the proof they were asked by the Holloway family not to.

Reynolds didn't elaborate, and Barron said people who went on the trip aren't publicly discussing details of what happened in Aruba at the request of Holloway's family, which fears the publicity could hamper the investigation.


No. Arlee just explained this about an hour ago (maybe more -- I've lost all concept of time). She said one paper interviewed a sophomore who didn't go on the trip and said he couldn't answer questions because he didn't go on the trip. that came out in the paper as he refused to talk because the family didn't want him to. the kids then said, "oh, they don't want us to talk? OK." and they didn't talk. But Dash's mom said the family NEVER ASKED THIS.


...writenow...so it is a rather desultory recollection from those who "came back from Aruba...on the trip that Natalee 'didn't make'...it's ...ummm...very different..wouldn't you say?...edit: I'm talking now...it's very strange/differnt/it's starnge...for me, too! (edit...6-26-05 GMT:7:08; 00:09 Pacific Time (touch my self!)


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: writenow on June 26, 2005, 03:05:50 AM
Quote from: "nikkibnurse"
G'night monkey friends...hope one of you guys solves this thing by the time i wake up in the morning..have a good night!


Nite Nik!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: columbo on June 26, 2005, 03:05:58 AM
Quote from: "Red"
columbo

Quote
Wow.  I'm almost take offense that you would take offense at my comment!  

Why wouldn't the MB students use the MSM to get their story out? How do you know that the MSM uses SLEAZY rules?? I enjoy this website, but in all honesty, it IS a website. I'm not trying to be confrontational, but are you suggesting that this website is the end all of all news?? We have the MSM giving every account of the suspects, yet there is no word on Natalee's friend's statements in the MSM. Sorry you're so offended by my question. Geez!


Actually its a blog not a website. I understand you enjoy it, I hope so because you are here.

Columbo, how do I know the MSM uses sleazy rules? You would ask a blogger such a question. Wow. Other than they fact that most every MB parent would back me on this , they do. I know you think this is like some insignificant blog and compared to the MSM it is. However, do you know how many MSM producers have contatced us on this story? Too many. Some have been better than others. Every network including multiple ones for different shows on each network. I am not at liberty to say names as I promised them.

Please think about the question you asked because you actually answer yourself. Why wouldn't the MB teens go on the shows? Why have there been so few? Maybe (I think I would know) that they are being treated poorly. It as been referenced many times prior to tonight.


Red,

I don't think this is an insignificant blog at all. I apologize if my comment portrayed it as such. And I apologize to you.....I understand where you're coming from. I just think the kids could help, not hurt the investigation by getting their story out. I cannot understand why/how the MSM would possibly treat these kids poorly as they are trying to get the story as well. .....that just doesn't make sense at all. But, that's just my opinion. I was just trying to make a timeline for Natalee to compare with the other side of the story.....sorry if I stepped on ya'll's toes. If the Admin. of this blog takes offense to the posts made, maybe I'm just in the wrong place.
Good luck Monkey's!!

Columbo.......out!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: puggywug on June 26, 2005, 03:06:37 AM
Quote from: "Sobelle"
Off Topic:  Your little pug is cute.

Thanks!  I have always had pugs, and I adore them.  My current "furbaby" is eleven and a half!

OK, I really am signing off and hitting the hay this time.

Pug kisses to all the Monkeys!  :D


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: DT on June 26, 2005, 03:09:44 AM
Quote from: "CancunMole"
Quote from: "Red"
Quote from: "writenow"
Quote from: "CancunMole"
I am convinced that the "young adults", not "kids" who have appeared on National TV have a prepared "script". Therefore, therefore there should be the number of inconsistnecises we heard.


Apparently you haven't met our little Dash.

No scripts, Cancun. You're reaching here.


What many of you may not be understanding is that the AL teens that went on TV did not have scripts. Actually just the opposite that I would defer to arlee to explain if she wishes. It has been researched and backed up by calls that I have made.

Maybe the teens that everyone wants to hear from would go on the MSM shows if they were treated with respect and told the truth. These teens committed no crime yet they are sometimes given a harder time than they actual suspects in this case.

Do not confuse nervousness and bewilderment with inconsistencies.


Delayed reaction; Right. Not only have I listened to Dash/Alana  (see my previous comments on ED) put I've watched the frantic postings of her mother, first as arbeej and now as arlee. I this a frantic mmother attempting recognition for her daughter? I don't know about the rest of you, but having tutored someone inCalculsuor anyhting else, never made me someoon's "closee friend". you?


When did she say tutoring her in calculus made her a close friend?  I think it was just an example of how good a person Natalee was and how good of a friend she was. But hey don't let that stop you from using it to attack MB'ers.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: TTownMike on June 26, 2005, 03:09:50 AM
Quote from: "DT"
Quote from: "Sobelle"
Inspector_Detector said:
I'm saying that there is NO evidence in this case. The Aruban police should be looking for evidence, and not arresting someone's father to try to force a confession out of someone...

Well said, Inspector!


Yes well said.  You certainly know for sure that their is no evidence in this case given that the police force has been completely silent in regards to evidence and leads, and I'm happy to see that Sobelle can recoqnize this as well.

Well, well said Dt!  Your sourchasm is underwhelmin!  Sotaspeak!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: sb on June 26, 2005, 03:09:58 AM
Quote from: "columbo"
Why wouldn't the MB students use the MSM to get their story out? How do you know that the MSM uses SLEAZY rules?? I enjoy this website, but in all honesty, it IS a website. I'm not trying to be confrontational, but are you suggesting that this website is the end all of all news?? We have the MSM giving every account of the suspects, yet there is no word on Natalee's friend's statements in the MSM. Sorry you're so offended by my question. Geez!


No, the problem is that the MSM IS interviewing the students, and that the students are being intimidated and steered by the MSM into giving contradictory versions of the events. A student who was IN C&C'S THAT NIGHT posts on here and has given us a clear picture of what happened, then goes on MSM and is 100% candid and trustworthy just like she is here. Then she is given the run-around by producers in the MSM.

Another student appears in MSM and says things differently from what the first student does and her version appears to match things the SUSPECTS were saying. That's kind of scary, you know?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: puggywug on June 26, 2005, 03:10:57 AM
Quote from: "CancunMole"
Delayed reaction; Right. Not only have I listened to Dash (see my previous comments on ED) put I've watched the frantic postings of her mother, first as arbeej and now as arlee. I this a frantic mmother attempting recognition for her daughter? I don't know about the rest of you, but having tutored someone inCalculsuor anyhting else, never made me someoon's "closee friend". you?

To my recollection, Dash never claimed to be close friends with Natalee.


Title: Re: NH
Post by: writenow on June 26, 2005, 03:12:11 AM
Quote from: "Whitney"
...writenow...so it is a rather desultory recollection from those who "came back from Aruba...on the trip that Natalee 'didn't make'...it's ...ummm...very different..wouldn't you say?


I don't think it's all that random. They've all talked to the FBI. And the FBI has shared that with Aruban LE. I'm sure the account has very concise, precise information. And I think it comes out well depending on the particular journalist asking the questions. Some journalists don't know how to do a good interview. Some are better than others. But really, short of the MSM and forums such as this, besides personally knowing someone from Mountain Brook, how would any of us know what happened?

And I'm not sure what you mean about the trip Natalee DIDN'T make. HUH? What do you mean?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Whitney on June 26, 2005, 03:14:20 AM
Quote from: "CancunMole"
Quote from: "Red"
Quote from: "writenow"
Quote from: "CancunMole"
I am convinced that the "young adults", not "kids" who have appeared on National TV have a prepared "script". Therefore, therefore there should be the number of inconsistnecises we heard.


Apparently you haven't met our little Dash.

No scripts, Cancun. You're reaching here.


What many of you may not be understanding is that the AL teens that went on TV did not have scripts. Actually just the opposite that I would defer to arlee to explain if she wishes. It has been researched and backed up by calls that I have made.

Maybe the teens that everyone wants to hear from would go on the MSM shows if they were treated with respect and told the truth. These teens committed no crime yet they are sometimes given a harder time than they actual suspects in this case.

Do not confuse nervousness and bewilderment with inconsistencies.


Delayed reaction; Right. Not only have I listened to Dash/Alana  (see my previous comments on ED) put I've watched the frantic postings of her mother, first as arbeej and now as arlee. I this a frantic mmother attempting recognition for her daughter? I don't know about the rest of you, but having tutored someone inCalculsuor anyhting else, never made me someoon's "closee friend". you?


...my take?  I know none of these peeps...You more than I...

If you recommend this...then I'll look to the CancunMole... (so tell me CancunMole)...

Whitney


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: PoorPaulaNNJ on June 26, 2005, 03:14:42 AM
Hi, All;
Any updates from EquaSearch?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Getagrip on June 26, 2005, 03:16:43 AM
Quote from: "PoorPaulaNNJ"
Hi, All;
Any updates from EquaSearch?

Nothing so far, Paula :(


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Anna on June 26, 2005, 03:16:58 AM
Quote from: "TTownMike"
Quote from: "CancunMole"
Quote from: "Red"
Quote from: "writenow"
Quote from: "CancunMole"
I am convinced that the "young adults", not "kids" who have appeared on National TV have a prepared "script". Therefore, therefore there should be the number of inconsistnecises we heard.


Apparently you haven't met our little Dash.

No scripts, Cancun. You're reaching here.


What many of you may not be understanding is that the AL teens that went on TV did not have scripts. Actually just the opposite that I would defer to arlee to explain if she wishes. It has been researched and backed up by calls that I have made.

Maybe the teens that everyone wants to hear from would go on the MSM shows if they were treated with respect and told the truth. These teens committed no crime yet they are sometimes given a harder time than they actual suspects in this case.

Do not confuse nervousness and bewilderment with inconsistencies.


SORRY RED, I don''t believe that! I BELIEVE THAT ALL OF THEM WHO WERE ON THIS TRIP WERE IN FACT GIVEN A SCRIPT TO FOLLOW.

LOL! ROFLMAO!  cancun?????  SEEK TREATMENT!  NOW!


You mean a script like that possibly bogus or not email supposedly from Deepak?  Now THERE was a script.  Only thing, his mother must not have gotten her copy.  She said Natalee did not speak one word to the boys, not one word and he said in that she said all kinds of ridiculous things.

So if they all say the same thing, it has to be a script instead of the truth?  All 140 of them?  I would thin some would tell if that happened.  A group that large could never keep any kind of secret.  That makes no sense for just like Deepak's mom, somebody would not get their copy or would not keep it straight.  But there are plenty of articles in newspapers quoting various kids.  What normal kid would spent their vacation monitoring Natalee, looking for aberant behavior, anyway?  Yes, girls talk but not when there is nothing to tell.  Joren was not in the same league as these kids and back home, would not have been anybody that I think NH would have wanted to even be seen with let alone have some torrid affair.

There is a good post previously on "carving out" which is the term the locals use in that region for separating a vulnerable female from her group by just sort of jostling her away from them into a car while in a crowd.  

But I don't see what your child-rearing practices have to do with any of this and do not follow your line of thought at all.  Who is blaming a country for something that can't be fixed?  Nothing is going to bring her back but should not others be given the warning?  18 is still considered a minor in this country, thus kids, they cannot vote or drink legally here at that age.  We even have many counties in this state that are called dry because alcohol is not sold but you can have it in your home, just have to buy it elsewhere but what does that have to do with anything?  These KIDS are as well reared as any anywhere.  Are you implyin that her disappearance has to do with her upbringing?  I surely hope not.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: PoorPaulaNNJ on June 26, 2005, 03:17:40 AM
Quote from: "Getagrip"
Quote from: "PoorPaulaNNJ"
Hi, All;
Any updates from EquaSearch?

Nothing so far, Paula :(


Rats!
Hopefully, soon.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: writenow on June 26, 2005, 03:18:59 AM
Quote from: "CancunMole"
Delayed reaction; Right. Not only have I listened to Dash/Alana  (see my previous comments on ED) put I've watched the frantic postings of her mother, first as arbeej and now as arlee. I this a frantic mmother attempting recognition for her daughter? I don't know about the rest of you, but having tutored someone inCalculsuor anyhting else, never made me someoon's "closee friend". you?


Well, Dash certainly knows Natalee a heck of a lot better than you do, but you've managed to take pot shots at both of them. So are you friends or family of those sitting in jail now? Is that your agenda? Just trying to get your friends out of jail? Fully believe in their innocence in spite of the fact that they keep changing their stories and a person is missing? And lets not forget how they didn't particularly mind fingering two guards to take the rap for them. Upstanding citizens!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Whitney on June 26, 2005, 03:19:45 AM
Quote from: "PoorPaulaNNJ"
Hi, All;
Any updates from EquaSearch?


the winds don't allow cadavar dogs to do their thing...that's all I know...

what a drepressing thought...my reportage is: "the winds don't allow cadavar dogs to do their thing."

And, she's/he's such a...well, you see!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: writenow on June 26, 2005, 03:22:15 AM
Quote from: "puggywug"
Quote from: "Sobelle"
Off Topic:  Your little pug is cute.

Thanks!  I have always had pugs, and I adore them.  My current "furbaby" is eleven and a half!

OK, I really am signing off and hitting the hay this time.

Pug kisses to all the Monkeys!  :D


Nite Puggy!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Getagrip on June 26, 2005, 03:22:45 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Are you implyin that her disappearance has to do with her upbringing?  I surely hope not.

Thanks for saying that more eloquently than I would have, Anna.

It's been my feeling all along, that all these attacks on NH and her family, just detract from finding out the truth. Unless you adhere to the theory that she's run away, which is as far fetched as drug lords snatching her up from the beach for trading her as a sex slave.

*sigh*


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: PoorPaulaNNJ on June 26, 2005, 03:22:58 AM
Quote from: "Whitney"
Quote from: "PoorPaulaNNJ"
Hi, All;
Any updates from EquaSearch?


the winds don't allow cadavar dogs to do their thing...that's all I know...

what a drepressing thought...my reportage is: "the winds don't allow cadavar dogs to do their thing."

And, she's/he's such a...well, you see!


Oh. I thought they could find people alive too. Sorry, didn't mean to make you have to think about that.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: TTownMike on June 26, 2005, 03:25:23 AM
Quote from: "Whitney"
Quote from: "sunmoonstars"
I happen to have a 17 yr old daughter that graduated this year. Personally, I would not have allowed her to go on a trip like this. Heck, I wouldn't allow her to go to Galveston after Prom like many of the seniors did. So, although Natalee seems to be by all accounts much like my daughter...I know girls talk! They talk about boys, who was with who, what they were wearing, etc. So, while I have the greatest of compassion and sympathy for the MB group.......I know teenagers. The things they did, saw and discussed could answer alot of unanswered questions.
Respectfully,

Another teens mom
sunmoonstarsgosh I hear you...may I suggest you vote Republican in the next general election and just ask yourself: do you want GERALDO or someone like Barbara Boxer speaking for you?...

Me neither...I've barely been able to read this paragraph and type this HTML...I came up under the Johnson administration's give anyone of color a job or a student placement.  LOL...and now I'm a doctor...not sayin' I got "mine"...[/b]


Uh, sunmoonstars,the questeurns you refer to could only provide the answers which they already have! (which basically establish who NAt was last seen with).  Persisting in this line of inquiry only shows a "can't let it go" attitude as to DIGGING UP SOME DIRT on the innocent victem!  SOTASPEAK!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Whitney on June 26, 2005, 03:25:54 AM
Quote from: "writenow"
Quote from: "CancunMole"
Delayed reaction; Right. Not only have I listened to Dash/Alana  (see my previous comments on ED) put I've watched the frantic postings of her mother, first as arbeej and now as arlee. I this a frantic mmother attempting recognition for her daughter? I don't know about the rest of you, but having tutored someone inCalculsuor anyhting else, never made me someoon's "closee friend". you?


Well, Dash certainly knows Natalee a heck of a lot better than you do, but you've managed to take pot shots at both of them. So are you friends or family of those sitting in jail now? Is that your agenda? Just trying to get your friends out of jail? Fully believe in their innocence in spite of the fact that they keep changing their stories and a person is missing? And lets not forget how they didn't particularly mind fingering two guards to take the rap for them. Upstanding citizens!


writenow:...I hesitated, but then it was clear:  look, all of this is FLUX;  if we get a beach-comber tomorrow with DNA all over his body and pulls up the woman/Natalee...; writenow, we really don't know beyond any sort of reasonable doubt that Natalee, or anyone else, is the subject of this inquery.  I know you know this.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: TTownMike on June 26, 2005, 03:26:38 AM
Quote from: "AZLady"
Mike--you do have a way with words! [admiringly] :roll:

Well, thankyaverymuch!  I resmble that remark! Sotaspeak! :wink:


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Anna on June 26, 2005, 03:28:30 AM
How would grilling the MB kids on national media tell you anything?  THEY are the first to admit they do not know what happened.  She was there standing with Joren one minute and gone the next and no one has seen her since.

Does toutoring somebody in calculus exclude one from being a friend, also?  I don't think so.  In fact, now that I think about it, that's how I passed as well, a friend helping me out.  

So exactly how many MB kids should give how many interviews to the MSM?  Personally, I have seen all I care to see and do not find their information that helpful for they do not know anything to tell.  And if they did, it has been told to the FBI by now, I am sure.  Not having anything to tell is not the same as refusing to tell as Baby has done.

 The very idea, pounding his chest at the mother of the girl he was with who disappeared.   :evil: What kind of kid pounds his chest, anyway?  I didn't notice any of the MB kids doing so now that I think about it.  Is this some new kewl thing kids do at adults these days?  

I'm still waiting for links to all of Joren's press conferences.   :?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: PoorPaulaNNJ on June 26, 2005, 03:28:42 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "TTownMike"
Quote from: "CancunMole"
Quote from: "Red"
Quote from: "writenow"
Quote from: "CancunMole"
I am convinced that the "young adults", not "kids" who have appeared on National TV have a prepared "script". Therefore, therefore there should be the number of inconsistnecises we heard.


Apparently you haven't met our little Dash.

No scripts, Cancun. You're reaching here.


What many of you may not be understanding is that the AL teens that went on TV did not have scripts. Actually just the opposite that I would defer to arlee to explain if she wishes. It has been researched and backed up by calls that I have made.

Maybe the teens that everyone wants to hear from would go on the MSM shows if they were treated with respect and told the truth. These teens committed no crime yet they are sometimes given a harder time than they actual suspects in this case.

Do not confuse nervousness and bewilderment with inconsistencies.


SORRY RED, I don''t believe that! I BELIEVE THAT ALL OF THEM WHO WERE ON THIS TRIP WERE IN FACT GIVEN A SCRIPT TO FOLLOW.

LOL! ROFLMAO!  cancun?????  SEEK TREATMENT!  NOW!


You mean a script like that possibly bogus or not email supposedly from Deepak?  Now THERE was a script.  Only thing, his mother must not have gotten her copy.  She said Natalee did not speak one word to the boys, not one word and he said in that she said all kinds of ridiculous things.

So if they all say the same thing, it has to be a script instead of the truth?  All 140 of them?  I would thin some would tell if that happened.  A group that large could never keep any kind of secret.  That makes no sense for just like Deepak's mom, somebody would not get their copy or would not keep it straight.  But there are plenty of articles in newspapers quoting various kids.  What normal kid would spent their vacation monitoring Natalee, looking for aberant behavior, anyway?  Yes, girls talk but not when there is nothing to tell.  Joren was not in the same league as these kids and back home, would not have been anybody that I think NH would have wanted to even be seen with let alone have some torrid affair.

There is a good post previously on "carving out" which is the term the locals use in that region for separating a vulnerable female from her group by just sort of jostling her away from them into a car while in a crowd.  

But I don't see what your child-rearing practices have to do with any of this and do not follow your line of thought at all.  Who is blaming a country for something that can't be fixed?  Nothing is going to bring her back but should not others be given the warning?  18 is still considered a minor in this country, thus kids, they cannot vote or drink legally here at that age.  We even have many counties in this state that are called dry because alcohol is not sold but you can have it in your home, just have to buy it elsewhere but what does that have to do with anything?  These KIDS are as well reared as any anywhere.  Are you implyin that her disappearance has to do with her upbringing?  I surely hope not.


I think a lot of people don't realize that even when you go somewhere with someone, you're not with them every moment. Since this was a group of 100+, it's only logical that this one saw this, that one saw that....and so on. It's just like when I go to the supermarket. The baker saw me looking at the bread, the butcher saw me put chops in my basket,  and so on. But you would never hear that there was a conspiracy because the checker wouldn't confirm that I put the bread or chops in my basket myself because she didn't see it.  No conspiracy. Does that make sense?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: writenow on June 26, 2005, 03:29:57 AM
Quote from: "Bamagal73"
Okey I just got home from work, and It's gonna take me an eternity to catch up on all the posts.  Can someone fill me in on any news from today?


No real news.
Group from Texas searching.
That's about it.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: TTownMike on June 26, 2005, 03:30:57 AM
Quote from: "sb"
Quote from: "columbo"
Why wouldn't the MB students use the MSM to get their story out? How do you know that the MSM uses SLEAZY rules?? I enjoy this website, but in all honesty, it IS a website. I'm not trying to be confrontational, but are you suggesting that this website is the end all of all news?? We have the MSM giving every account of the suspects, yet there is no word on Natalee's friend's statements in the MSM. Sorry you're so offended by my question. Geez!


No, the problem is that the MSM IS interviewing the students, and that the students are being intimidated and steered by the MSM into giving contradictory versions of the events. A student who was IN C&C'S THAT NIGHT posts on here and has given us a clear picture of what happened, then goes on MSM and is 100% candid and trustworthy just like she is here. Then she is given the run-around by producers in the MSM.

Another student appears in MSM and says things differently from what the first student does and her version appears to match things the SUSPECTS were saying. That's kind of scary, you know?

Das a good point sb!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: pybird on June 26, 2005, 03:30:59 AM
Quote from: "CancunMole"
Quote from: "Red"
Quote from: "writenow"
Quote from: "CancunMole"
I am convinced that the "young adults", not "kids" who have appeared on National TV have a prepared "script". Therefore, therefore there should be the number of inconsistnecises we heard.


Apparently you haven't met our little Dash.

No scripts, Cancun. You're reaching here.


What many of you may not be understanding is that the AL teens that went on TV did not have scripts. Actually just the opposite that I would defer to arlee to explain if she wishes. It has been researched and backed up by calls that I have made.

Maybe the teens that everyone wants to hear from would go on the MSM shows if they were treated with respect and told the truth. These teens committed no crime yet they are sometimes given a harder time than they actual suspects in this case.

Do not confuse nervousness and bewilderment with inconsistencies.


Delayed reaction; Right. Not only have I listened to Dash/Alana  (see my previous comments on ED) put I've watched the frantic postings of her mother, first as arbeej and now as arlee. I this a frantic mmother attempting recognition for her daughter? I don't know about the rest of you, but having tutored someone inCalculsuor anyhting else, never made me someoon's "closee friend". you?


The only thing I can say in reference to this post is that I thought Frances Ellen was her close friend, her roomie in fact.  And the other girl, Meredith?  I see FE in most of the photos that we see Natalee in.  Not that all this means anything...just sayin'.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: sunmoonstars on June 26, 2005, 03:31:25 AM
Quote from: "TTownMike"
Quote from: "Whitney"
Quote from: "sunmoonstars"
I happen to have a 17 yr old daughter that graduated this year. Personally, I would not have allowed her to go on a trip like this. Heck, I wouldn't allow her to go to Galveston after Prom like many of the seniors did. So, although Natalee seems to be by all accounts much like my daughter...I know girls talk! They talk about boys, who was with who, what they were wearing, etc. So, while I have the greatest of compassion and sympathy for the MB group.......I know teenagers. The things they did, saw and discussed could answer alot of unanswered questions.
Respectfully,

Another teens mom
sunmoonstarsgosh I hear you...may I suggest you vote Republican in the next general election and just ask yourself: do you want GERALDO or someone like Barbara Boxer speaking for you?...

Me neither...I've barely been able to read this paragraph and type this HTML...I came up under the Johnson administration's give anyone of color a job or a student placement.  LOL...and now I'm a doctor...not sayin' I got "mine"...[/b]


Uh, sunmoonstars,the questeurns you refer to could only provide the answers which they already have! (which basically establish who NAt was last seen with).  Persisting in this line of inquiry only shows a "can't let it go" attitude as to DIGGING UP SOME DIRT on the innocent victem!  SOTASPEAK!

Mike, excuse me but I don't think you know me well enough to make those assumptions! I have sat here night after night and watched you call people all kinds of sick names! I don't know if you find them humorous, but I sure don't.
I am not saying ANYTHING negative about Natalee! The only reason that I got involved in this in the first place was because of how she was described. She reminds me of my own daughter, good kid, good grades, never in trouble, etc. I think the only mistake she made was being nice to someone. I know how some like to make fun of the southerners in here. Well, here is a good one for you.........they are taught not to be rude. So, sometimes they come across as being too friendly. I can personally see my own daughter doing the same thing. So, before you make your nasty remarks to me, get to know me better.
Thank you very much!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Red on June 26, 2005, 03:33:04 AM
I am going to sleep folks as I think I have actually heard enough of somehow blaming teens for not going on shows or having scripted speaches as being gulity that those that are in jail.

Folks there has been a crime committed, either its kidnapping or worse.

For the love of God keep your eye on the ball. This is about a missing teen and that fact that she has literally disappeared. How this has become about MB teens would have any defense attorney doing back flips.

Say a prayer for Natalee and her family.

Good night all. Let's just all remember the primary focus here and be respectful of one another. Guilt is to be placed on those who commited the crime and no one else.

Good night.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: TTownMike on June 26, 2005, 03:33:42 AM
Quote from: "puggywug"
Quote from: "CancunMole"
Delayed reaction; Right. Not only have I listened to Dash (see my previous comments on ED) put I've watched the frantic postings of her mother, first as arbeej and now as arlee. I this a frantic mmother attempting recognition for her daughter? I don't know about the rest of you, but having tutored someone inCalculsuor anyhting else, never made me someoon's "closee friend". you?

To my recollection, Dash never claimed to be close friends with Natalee.


Well, Dash(if ya thankaboutit) was purty dadgum spercific in describing her relationship with Nat!  And I for one would develop a purty good feelin about anyone I spend that much time with!  I blieve Dash!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: writenow on June 26, 2005, 03:34:21 AM
Quote from: "Whitney"
writenow:...I hesitated, but then it was clear:  look, all of this is FLUX;  if we get a beach-comber tomorrow with DNA all over his body and pulls up the woman/Natalee...; writenow, we really don't know beyond any sort of reasonable doubt that Natalee, or anyone else, is the subject of this inquery.  I know you know this.


Well, ahhh, we DO know it's about Natalee. That's kinda how this whole thing got started.

It's late. Nite guys.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Getagrip on June 26, 2005, 03:35:37 AM
Night, Red! Right behind ya ;)

Good night everyone!

*keeping my eye on the ball*


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: writenow on June 26, 2005, 03:36:36 AM
Quote from: "Red"
I am going to sleep folks as I think I have actually heard enough of somehow blaming teens for not going on shows or having scripted speaches as being gulity that those that are in jail.

Folks there has been a crime committed, either its kidnapping or worse.

For the love of God keep your eye on the ball. This is about a missing teen and that fact that she has literally disappeared. How this has become about MB teens would have any defense attorney doing back flips.

Say a prayer for Natalee and her family.

Good night all. Let's just all remember the primary focus here and be respectful of one another. Guilt is to be placed on those who commited the crime and no one else.

Good night.


Amen and amen. Nite Red!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Whitney on June 26, 2005, 03:37:49 AM
...look, from my perspective, it's very kewl...it's someithing to watch...

Hey...I only what I've experienced and what works...from what I've seen of you?  A lot of you are screwed!


Heya...give me the blonde gal who was sympthetic....know how that happened?...well than...'xplain-it-small-details-so-we-get-it-RIGHT...


Come forward and either 'kiss me' or just call and say:  I'm the 'monitor to your right..."..

so what'd you thiing ob that "left" maneuver......


"wake me up/I wold hime up.....GW....just maintain concsiousness about our hand-holdings....I've never done anthing to any of this....


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: PoorPaulaNNJ on June 26, 2005, 03:38:38 AM
Me too. Night, All. Sleep tight.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: sunmoonstars on June 26, 2005, 03:39:29 AM
You still there MIKE? I would like your reply so I can go to sleep.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: TTownMike on June 26, 2005, 03:40:58 AM
If a big tree in a vast forrest falls but no one was there to hear it, does that mean it didn't make any noise?   GET IT!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: pybird on June 26, 2005, 03:45:39 AM
Anna wrote: Yes, girls talk but not when there is nothing to tell. Joren was not in the same league as these kids and back home, would not have been anybody that I think NH would have wanted to even be seen with let alone have some torrid affair.

Anna, will you please explain how Joren is not in the same league as the kids back home?  I do not think Joren is a bad looking young man.  Kinda cute, IMO.  Torrid affair???


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: friend of monkeys on June 26, 2005, 03:47:11 AM
Quote from: "Whitney"
Quote from: "Compananzi"
Quote from: "arubagirl"
coco, according to Canal 90 they have interrogated AvdS


I think its a bit disgusting to see Jug smile with glee at Paul's arrest.  He'll probably be so happy if they charge AVDS as well.

You know when people get killed or murdered you always see the family crying and sobbing...I have not seen it in MSM. Maybe they cry off camera, but it sure looks cold to me...it raises no sympathy...so I hope hope the spin doc relay this to the them.


I've commented before on those extended family dynamics and your conclusions are not exactly as my own; however, Jug's public (on TV behavior over these past three weeks certainly allows enough to comment upon his interaction with Beth and that with NH....)  I offer his public statement about his relationship with his bio-son...was that George, last night, and his comments about Natalee...

If you heard it, you know what I heard...and if you didn't then you didn't...suffice to say it was different...it was.


help me here????


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: sunmoonstars on June 26, 2005, 03:48:08 AM
Quote from: "sunmoonstars"
You still there MIKE? I would like your reply so I can go to sleep.

You are a most arrogant human being, aren't you? You think you are the only one with the right to an opinion. If someone says something (even though you misunderstood) that you don't like.......oh, be a man and ignore them.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Sobelle on June 26, 2005, 03:48:37 AM
Quote from: "TTownMike"
If a big tree in a vast forrest falls but no one was there to hear it, does that mean it didn't make any noise?   GET IT!


Dang it!  I was hoping that the big old tree in the vast forest fell on ya!
 :D


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: sunmoonstars on June 26, 2005, 03:50:04 AM
And you are the moderator? Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm


Title: TX EquuSearch Update
Post by: Itawamba on June 26, 2005, 03:50:11 AM
TX EquuSearch Update


Sorry, all--took me so much time to read and try to catch up that I forgot to post a very small update on TX EquuSearch.

While it's true that the winds on Aruba were quite strong today and they did affect the dogs' work earlier in the day and afternoon, Tim Miller said tonight that they were able to get back to work in the later afternoon and make some progress.  Video showed the dogs working near a hotel.

They have been in the water with the side-scan sonar in at least a couple of places already searched and one that hadn't been (this was as of this evening, sometime before the 10PM CDT newscast).  Eight divers were all assisting during the day and evening.  (Probably still are, as I write this.)

Tim commented on the amount of detritus to sift through being exceptionally voluminous, but not a problem they haven't encountered before.  I assume this is because of tourist areas and so many people coming and going--wrappers, cans, bottles, clothing items.  It's very difficult under these circumstances to know what might be evidence.

It was also mentioned (can't recall if Tim said it or if I read it in an earlier update this afternoon) that Arubans may be called upon to help some of the ground-pounders in coming days.

Of course, anything of significance found will be turned over to authorities--I don't know if they will *announce* anything at this time.  He did say the water searches of today had not turned up anything useful.

I was also surprised to learn there is a total of 24 team members (rather than 17) on the ground in Aruba--and 4 SAR dogs.  Our local news said that three additional dogs had gone down today.  (I thought they were "behind" and just reporting the last dog team, but I had this confirmed, and there are 4--only 1 dog went Friday.)

I might be forgetting one other aspect of today's searches, but I can't think of what it is!

~~~~~~~~
I'm editing to change the number of dogs to 4 from 6--only 1 dog went on Friday, then 3 on Sat.  My original info was that 3 dogs went on Fri and 3 on Sat.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: sunmoonstars on June 26, 2005, 03:51:07 AM
Quote from: "Sobelle"
Quote from: "TTownMike"
If a big tree in a vast forrest falls but no one was there to hear it, does that mean it didn't make any noise?   GET IT!


Dang it!  I was hoping that the big old tree in the vast forest fell on ya!
 :D

Sobelle,
Are you referring to me?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Anna on June 26, 2005, 03:53:24 AM
Well, I just do not understand for the life of me what it is the MB kids are supposed to reveal in interviews on national media.  What questions is it only they have the answers to that have not been given already?  What "unanswered" questions?  I think they have answered all of them that they have the answers to in the first place.

But I also think what some want from them is just dirt on Natalee and until they hear that, there will be claims the kids are not telling because it is just not what they want to hear.  Ever think there just might not be any dirt for them to tell?  

All time lines and what happened when has been documented from those on the trip several times.  So what is it they failed to answer?  Other than, of course, the low down on Natalee with some good, vivid dirt??

Guess the search team is the last hope of even finding a body for the parents to take home to bury of their beautiful and talented daughter.   :roll: Anyone who could have watched Dave Holloway digging in the dump, the one NEVER YET SEARCHED UNTL THIS DAY, located very close to the suspect's home, for his daughter and only wants to hear dirt might want to ask themselves why that is.  I can't think of a reason.  Those are the kinds of questions that bother me and the kids from MB surely do not know the answers to them.  

Guess I will call it a day and hope for some results from the search team quickly so all can at least know something about what happened to her.  Remember them, too,  in your prayers and I will do the same.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Sobelle on June 26, 2005, 03:53:35 AM
Quote from: "sunmoonstars"
Quote from: "Sobelle"
Quote from: "TTownMike"
If a big tree in a vast forrest falls but no one was there to hear it, does that mean it didn't make any noise?   GET IT!


Dang it!  I was hoping that the big old tree in the vast forest fell on ya!
 :D

Sobelle,
Are you referring to me?


No I wasn't referring to you.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: NoDumbBunny on June 26, 2005, 03:56:09 AM
Did any of you guys see this article in the Birmingham Post Herald's Metro section??  

It's titled:
"Was Aruba trip managed well?
Most defend chaperones' actions as proper "



http://www.postherald.com/me062405.shtml


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: TTownMike on June 26, 2005, 03:56:55 AM
Quote from: "sunmoonstars"
Quote from: "TTownMike"
Quote from: "Whitney"
Quote from: "sunmoonstars"
I happen to have a 17 yr old daughter that graduated this year. Personally, I would not have allowed her to go on a trip like this. Heck, I wouldn't allow her to go to Galveston after Prom like many of the seniors did. So, although Natalee seems to be by all accounts much like my daughter...I know girls talk! They talk about boys, who was with who, what they were wearing, etc. So, while I have the greatest of compassion and sympathy for the MB group.......I know teenagers. The things they did, saw and discussed could answer alot of unanswered questions.
Respectfully,

"Uh, sunmoonstars,the questeurns you refer to could only provide the answers which they already have! (which basically establish who NAt was last seen with).  Persisting in this line of inquiry only shows a "can't let it go" attitude as to DIGGING UP SOME DIRT on the innocent victem!  SOTASPEAK!

Mike, excuse me but I don't think you know me well enough to make those assumptions! I have sat here night after night and watched you call people all kinds of sick names! I don't know if you find them humorous, but I sure don't.
I am not saying ANYTHING negative about Natalee! The only reason that I got involved in this in the first place was because of how she was described. She reminds me of my own daughter, good kid, good grades, never in trouble, etc. I think the only mistake she made was being nice to someone. I know how some like to make fun of the southerners in here. Well, here is a good one for you.........they are taught not to be rude. So, sometimes they come across as being too friendly. I can personally see my own daughter doing the same thing. So, before you make your nasty remarks to me, get to know me better.
Thank you very much!

Uh, scuse me!  No offense in fact intended.  If you read my words more closely, what I said was that we know ENOUGH of what happened before she disappeared!  Why the insistence on belaboring the point there?  
She went with him!   That's all the MB kids can tell us that is meaningful AT ALL!  To continue insisting they be badgered more in public only shows " a "can't let it go" attitude as to DIGGING UP SOME DIRT on the innocent victem! "  If you think I'm wrong, where?

As to "I have sat here night after night and watched you call people all kinds of sick names!"  WHUTCHUTAWKINBOUT?  Who? When? Where?  What's yer source?

And besides all that, sunmoonstars, I do not mean offense!  I simply question what you would hope or expect from all that.  
Please accept my apology if you think I am wrong to wonder what you mean.  But it is you who have made assumptions, not I!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: CancunMole on June 26, 2005, 03:59:19 AM
Quote from: "AZLady"
Quote from: "CancunMole"
Quote from: "AZLady"
Quote from: "CancunMole


I may be behind because of my dial up connection but believe me, I'm not BEHIND. This girl's mother has from the get go been IMOO, been beyond involvement. I personally question what the motives are? I have bolded my question so there is no other question about what I am asking. I'm from Maine originally and I'm sick of the BS. Dash is no more a confidant of NH than ED. Did no one else (with the replay, not get that ED deviated from the script?)


Cancun, the motives are a mother's love for her daughter!  I bolded the answer so there is no doubt about the answer.  I am a mother of a 21 year old, and I would do the same.  When I mentioned to my daughter that I admired Beth H. Twitty for her strength in the face of incredible pain, my daughter said "Mom, you would do the same!"


I too am a mother. I have two sons, I have exposed my sons beyond the "norm" of America. I have allowed them to drink, in our home at meals and on trips. I have allowed them to gamble (you can see my thoughts by SEARCH id interested, and I've taught them to respect others.  My children know how to act/behave when they leave the country.

JUu said his kids had gone  3 years ago and had told him about Aruba. So why let NH go? When any parent has information, don't blame.. PLEASE KNOW THAT AS A MOTHER, I WANT THIS YOUNG GIRL TO COME HOME but don't blame a country for something that can't be fixed.


Cancun, unless I misunderstand, you asked what Beth's motives are.  I understood you to mean regarding her involvement in finding her daughter.  You wrote: This girl's mother has from the get go been IMOO, been beyond involvement.  I responded with the reason for Beth's involvement.  It seemed fairly clear to me.

You are mixing this in with your demands to question the MB kids.  Now you respond with telling us about your own kids, and how you've raised them.  I don't get what you are trying to say.  I'm sorry, but it just doesn't fit together, and I don't know how to have a conversation with you regarding this.  Are you trying to throw mud at the Holloways and the MB kids and hope some sticks?  Why would you want to do that?

No one "blame a country for something that can't be fixed."  I do not blame Aruba.  No one here blames Aruba.  No one here is that small-minded.  We are fixing our blame right where it belongs--with the people in jail.


Slowing catching up, not erasing because: I was NOt speaking oof NH's motheer but Dash/Alana's. Here is wishing that some would at least read what's been posted.


Title: Re: TX EquuSearch Update
Post by: pybird on June 26, 2005, 03:59:29 AM
Quote from: "Itawamba"
TX EquuSearch Update


Sorry, all--took me so much time to read and try to catch up that I forgot to post a very small update on TX EquuSearch.

While it's true that the winds on Aruba were quite strong today and they did affect the dogs' work earlier in the day and afternoon, Tim Miller said tonight that they were able to get back to work in the later afternoon and make some progress.  Video showed the dogs working near a hotel.

They have been in the water with the side-scan sonar in at least a couple of places already searched and one that hadn't been (this was as of this evening, sometime before the 10PM CDT newscast).  Eight divers were all assisting during the day and evening.  (Probably still are, as I write this.)

Tim commented on the amount of detritus to sift through being exceptionally voluminous, but not a problem they haven't encountered before.  I assume this is because of tourist areas and so many people coming and going--wrappers, cans, bottles, clothing items.  It's very difficult under these circumstances to know what might be evidence.

It was also mentioned (can't recall if Tim said it or if I read it in an earlier update this afternoon) that Arubans may be called upon to help some of the ground-pounders in coming days.

Of course, anything of significance found will be turned over to authorities--I don't know if they will *announce* anything at this time.  He did say the water searches of today had not turned up anything useful.

I was also surprised to learn there is a total of 24 team members (rather than 17) on the ground in Aruba--and possibly 6 SAR dogs.  Our local news said that three additional dogs had gone down today.  (I thought they were "behind" and just reporting the last dog team, but I had this confirmed, and there are 6.)

I might be forgetting one other aspect of today's searches, but I can't think of what it is!


Thank you for the update.  I'd heard 24 team members, but only 3 dogs.

Thanks again


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: TTownMike on June 26, 2005, 04:03:22 AM
Quote from: "sunmoonstars"
Quote from: "sunmoonstars"
You still there MIKE? I would like your reply so I can go to sleep.

You are a most arrogant human being, aren't you? You think you are the only one with the right to an opinion. If someone says something (even though you misunderstood) that you don't like.......oh, be a man and ignore them.


Wait just a minute!  Who calls whom names here?  Not I, madame! If you will see my response (which you are too impatient to wait for) you will get it!  I only asked you questions!  You in turn attack me!  I believe you just don't understand!  
Sorry to keep you waiting!  I didn't know it was a timed exam!
Thankyouverymuch!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: TTownMike on June 26, 2005, 04:05:53 AM
Quote from: "Sobelle"
Quote from: "sunmoonstars"
Quote from: "Sobelle"
Quote from: "TTownMike"
If a big tree in a vast forrest falls but no one was there to hear it, does that mean it didn't make any noise?   GET IT!


Dang it!  I was hoping that the big old tree in the vast forest fell on ya!
 :D

Sobelle,
Are you referring to me?


No I wasn't referring to you.

So Sobelle, you think you got a dog in this fight?  I don't believe I said anything to you or about you!  But you too, apparently don't understand!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: CancunMole on June 26, 2005, 04:06:25 AM
Quote from: "AZLady"
Quote from: "CancunMole"
Quote from: "AZLady"
Quote from: "CancunMole


I may be behind because of my dial up connection but believe me, I'm not BEHIND. This girl's mother has from the get go been IMOO, been beyond involvement. I personally question what the motives are? I have bolded my question so there is no other question about what I am asking. I'm from Maine originally and I'm sick of the BS. Dash is no more a confidant of NH than ED. Did no one else (with the replay, not get that ED deviated from the script?)


Cancun, the motives are a mother's love for her daughter!  I bolded the answer so there is no doubt about the answer.  I am a mother of a 21 year old, and I would do the same.  When I mentioned to my daughter that I admired Beth H. Twitty for her strength in the face of incredible pain, my daughter said "Mom, you would do the same!"


I too am a mother. I have two sons, I have exposed my sons beyond the "norm" of America. I have allowed them to drink, in our home at meals and on trips. I have allowed them to gamble (you can see my thoughts by SEARCH id interested, and I've taught them to respect others.  My children know how to act/behave when they leave the country.

JUu said his kids had gone  3 years ago and had told him about Aruba. So why let NH go? When any parent has information, don't blame.. PLEASE KNOW THAT AS A MOTHER, I WANT THIS YOUNG GIRL TO COME HOME but don't blame a country for something that can't be fixed.


Cancun, unless I misunderstand, you asked what Beth's motives are.  I understood you to mean regarding her involvement in finding her daughter.  You wrote: This girl's mother has from the get go been IMOO, been beyond involvement.  I responded with the reason for Beth's involvement.  It seemed fairly clear to me.

You are mixing this in with your demands to question the MB kids.  Now you respond with telling us about your own kids, and how you've raised them.  I don't get what you are trying to say.  I'm sorry, but it just doesn't fit together, and I don't know how to have a conversation with you regarding this.  Are you trying to throw mud at the Holloways and the MB kids and hope some sticks?  Why would you want to do that?

No one "blame a country for something that can't be fixed."  I do not blame Aruba.  No one here blames Aruba.  No one here is that small-minded.  We are fixing our blame right where it belongs--with the people in jail.

I DID NOT ASK WHAT BHT'S MOTIVES WERE. II ASKEd WHAT OTHER PEOPLE'S MOTIVE WERE FOR ALLOWING THEIR CHILDREN TO RESPOND TO UNANSWERED QUESTIONS that were  unanswered? If it can be asked of those in Aruba that we know nothing about, can't we ask it of those at home?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: sunmoonstars on June 26, 2005, 04:07:44 AM
Quote from: "TTownMike"
Quote from: "sunmoonstars"
Quote from: "TTownMike"
Quote from: "Whitney"
Quote from: "sunmoonstars"
I happen to have a 17 yr old daughter that graduated this year. Personally, I would not have allowed her to go on a trip like this. Heck, I wouldn't allow her to go to Galveston after Prom like many of the seniors did. So, although Natalee seems to be by all accounts much like my daughter...I know girls talk! They talk about boys, who was with who, what they were wearing, etc. So, while I have the greatest of compassion and sympathy for the MB group.......I know teenagers. The things they did, saw and discussed could answer alot of unanswered questions.
Respectfully,

"Uh, sunmoonstars,the questeurns you refer to could only provide the answers which they already have! (which basically establish who NAt was last seen with).  Persisting in this line of inquiry only shows a "can't let it go" attitude as to DIGGING UP SOME DIRT on the innocent victem!  SOTASPEAK!

Mike, excuse me but I don't think you know me well enough to make those assumptions! I have sat here night after night and watched you call people all kinds of sick names! I don't know if you find them humorous, but I sure don't.
I am not saying ANYTHING negative about Natalee! The only reason that I got involved in this in the first place was because of how she was described. She reminds me of my own daughter, good kid, good grades, never in trouble, etc. I think the only mistake she made was being nice to someone. I know how some like to make fun of the southerners in here. Well, here is a good one for you.........they are taught not to be rude. So, sometimes they come across as being too friendly. I can personally see my own daughter doing the same thing. So, before you make your nasty remarks to me, get to know me better.
Thank you very much!

Uh, scuse me!  No offense in fact intended.  If you read my words more closely, what I said was that we know ENOUGH of what happened before she disappeared!  Why the insistence on belaboring the point there?  
She went with him!   That's all the MB kids can tell us that is meaningful AT ALL!  To continue insisting they be badgered more in public only shows " a "can't let it go" attitude as to DIGGING UP SOME DIRT on the innocent victem! "  If you think I'm wrong, where?

As to "I have sat here night after night and watched you call people all kinds of sick names!"  WHUTCHUTAWKINBOUT?  Who? When? Where?  What's yer source?

And besides all that, sunmoonstars, I do not mean offense!  I simply question what you would hope or expect from all that.  
Please accept my apology if you think I am wrong to wonder what you mean.  But it is you who have made assumptions, not I!


Mike, I am not trying to dig up dirt on anyone. As I have stated, she reminds me of my own daughter. Anyone would be hard pressed to find dirt on her! So, by that, I mean I think Natalee is a great young lady. I don't think she did anything wrong, didn't deserve anything that may have happened. I think, like mine, she may have been naive. But, in todays world, thank God she still could be! As for the rest, I am just too tired and bleary eyed to look it all up. So, I'm willing to let it go and hope you will too. I meant no offense to anyone. I PM'd Anne to see if it was me who offended her and she assured me it wasn't. So, what is past is past.
Good nite


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: CancunMole on June 26, 2005, 04:09:36 AM
Quote from: "TTownMike"
Quote from: "CancunMole"
Quote from: "Red"
Quote from: "writenow"
Quote from: "CancunMole"
I am convinced that the "young adults", not "kids" who have appeared on National TV have a prepared "script". Therefore, therefore there should be the number of inconsistnecises we heard.


Apparently you haven't met our little Dash.

No scripts, Cancun. You're reaching here.


What many of you may not be understanding is that the AL teens that went on TV did not have scripts. Actually just the opposite that I would defer to arlee to explain if she wishes. It has been researched and backed up by calls that I have made.

Maybe the teens that everyone wants to hear from would go on the MSM shows if they were treated with respect and told the truth. These teens committed no crime yet they are sometimes given a harder time than they actual suspects in this case.

Do not confuse nervousness and bewilderment with inconsistencies.


SORRY RED, I don''t believe that! I BELIEVE THAT ALL OF THEM WHO WERE ON THIS TRIP WERE IN FACT GIVEN A SCRIPT TO FOLLOW.

LOL! ROFLMAO!  cancun?????  SEEK TREATMENT!  NOW!


I still say, BS. Watched mosst everything and: BS.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Sobelle on June 26, 2005, 04:10:31 AM
Quote from: "TTownMike"
Quote from: "Sobelle"
Quote from: "sunmoonstars"
Quote from: "Sobelle"
Quote from: "TTownMike"
If a big tree in a vast forrest falls but no one was there to hear it, does that mean it didn't make any noise?   GET IT!


Dang it!  I was hoping that the big old tree in the vast forest fell on ya!
 :D

Sobelle,
Are you referring to me?


No I wasn't referring to you.

So Sobelle, you think you got a dog in this fight?  I don't believe I said anything to you or about you!  But you too, apparently don't understand!


No dog in any fight.  That's why I put the smiley face.  You were being a little rough on her though.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: TTownMike on June 26, 2005, 04:12:00 AM
Quote from: "sunmoonstars"
Quote from: "TTownMike"
Quote from: "sunmoonstars"
Quote from: "TTownMike"
Quote from: "Whitney"
Quote from: "sunmoonstars"
I Mike, I am not trying to dig up dirt on anyone. As I have stated, she reminds me of my own daughter. Anyone would be hard pressed to find dirt on her! So, by that, I mean I think Natalee is a great young lady. I don't think she did anything wrong, didn't deserve anything that may have happened. I think, like mine, she may have been naive. But, in todays world, thank God she still could be! As for the rest, I am just too tired and bleary eyed to look it all up. So, I'm willing to let it go and hope you will too. I meant no offense to anyone. I PM'd Anne to see if it was me who offended her and she assured me it wasn't. So, what is past is past.
Good nite

I did not accuse you!  I simply say that the interrogation of her friends does no good!  I appreciate your being a mother! I apologize that you were offended!  NO FENCE! :)


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: sunmoonstars on June 26, 2005, 04:15:12 AM
Sobelle, sorry and thank you!  :D


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: mojo on June 26, 2005, 04:16:59 AM
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20050626/ap_on_re_la_am_ca/aruba_the_question

Mystery Shrouds Disappearance in Aruba

ORANJESTAD, Aruba - As the mystery of a missing Alabama honors student drags on, questions abound about Aruban authorities' handling of the Dutch Caribbean island's highest-profile case in decades.

Why were the young men last seen with 18-year-old Natalee Holloway left free for days after she disappeared May 30, the last day of a five-day high school graduation trip with 124 other students? Why did police wait 16 days after she went missing before searching the home of the Dutch youth who was flirting with her? Why did Aruban officials ask the
FBI to send divers, who came to the island but never searched its waters?


it goes on and pretty much sums up the questions and frustrations of this whole investigation. if LE don't have any real evidence and Equusearch doesn't have any luck, i dread to think what will happen.  CnC should start by handing out those coasters and in my reading last night i found that while the colorless rohypnol still exists manufacturers have for several years included a blue dye that makes it visible when mixed with a drink....solution make blue drinks (beneath contempt) and the blue liquer is curacao  :cry:  man...


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Sobelle on June 26, 2005, 04:17:03 AM
Quote from: "sunmoonstars"
Sobelle, sorry and thank you!  :D


 :)


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: kandeyingeorgia on June 26, 2005, 04:17:13 AM
AZLady wrote:
Quote from: "CancunMole


I may be behind because of my dial up connection but believe me, I'm not BEHIND. This girl's mother has from the get go been IMOO, been beyond involvement. I personally question what the motives are? I have bolded my question so there is no other question about what I am asking. I'm from Maine originally and I'm sick of the BS. Dash is no more a confidant of NH than ED. Did no one else (with the replay, not get that ED deviated from the script?)

************************************************

Congratulations!  You are awarded most ignorant post of the day.  WTH are you talking about?  Why do you question the mom's motives?  She has been "beyond involvement"?  And exactly what would you have her do -- sit idly by and do nothing?  What would you do if it were your child missing?  Anyone who has watched this woman from day one would know that she looks exhausted and appears on the verge of a nervous breakdown.  The only motives I question are those of the 5 individuals sitting in jail, whose stories change daily.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: sb on June 26, 2005, 04:22:47 AM
ONE last post and I am going to bed.

The reason many of us want more info from the MB kids is because there are people out there trying to smear her and we want ammunition to counter that.

I REFUSE TO BELIEVE that she was carrying out any secret liaisons with Joran during the trip. I REFUSE TO BELIEVE that she "came on" to him that Sunday night. I REFUSE TO BELIEVE that she left that bar with intentions of consensual sexual activity.

AND I REFUSE TO BELIEVE THAT JORAN DID NOT PREMEDITATE PICKING HER UP AND DID NOT HAVE THE THING PLANNED FROM THE GET-GO.

Anything that hints at any of those situations, I want to be able to shoot down with FACTS.


Good night. Pray for Natalee and her family!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Sobelle on June 26, 2005, 04:26:52 AM
TTownMike
I can't figure out how to pm.   :)


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: CancunMole on June 26, 2005, 04:27:15 AM
Quote from: "TTownMike"
Quote from: "CancunMole"
Quote from: "Red"
Quote from: "writenow"
Quote from: "CancunMole"
I am convinced that the "young adults", not "kids" who have appeared on National TV have a prepared "script". Therefore, therefore there should be the number of inconsistnecises we heard.


Apparently you haven't met our little Dash.

No scripts, Cancun. You're reaching here.


What many of you may not be understanding is that the AL teens that went on TV did not have scripts. Actually just the opposite that I would defer to arlee to explain if she wishes. It has been researched and backed up by calls that I have made.

Maybe the teens that everyone wants to hear from would go on the MSM shows if they were treated with respect and told the truth. These teens committed no crime yet they are sometimes given a harder time than they actual suspects in this case.

Do not confuse nervousness and bewilderment with inconsistencies.


SORRY RED, I don''t believe that! I BELIEVE THAT ALL OF THEM WHO WERE ON THIS TRIP WERE IN FACT GIVEN A SCRIPT TO FOLLOW.

LOL! ROFLMAO!  cancun?????  SEEK TREATMENT!  NOW!


Actually I have. Explained my worst fears and was told to take the blanket oh, it was a sheet off my eyes.


Title: Pm
Post by: sunmoonstars on June 26, 2005, 04:30:34 AM
Sobelle, look at the top of the page right under scared monkeys. It will tell you if you have any pms. Hope this helps!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: sunmoonstars on June 26, 2005, 04:31:32 AM
good night all


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: CancunMole on June 26, 2005, 04:33:48 AM
Quote from: "puggywug"
Quote from: "CancunMole"
Delayed reaction; Right. Not only have I listened to Dash (see my previous comments on ED) put I've watched the frantic postings of her mother, first as arbeej and now as arlee. I this a frantic mmother attempting recognition for her daughter? I don't know about the rest of you, but having tutored someone inCalculsuor anyhting else, never made me someoon's "closee friend". you?

To my recollection, Dash never claimed to be close friends with Natalee.[/quote

Watch again. Personally, I could give a sweet s---.   But, don't lie to me then expect me to believe all the rest . Lo ciento.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: CancunMole on June 26, 2005, 04:36:29 AM
Quote from: "Whitney"
Quote from: "CancunMole"
Quote from: "Red"
Quote from: "writenow"
Quote from: "CancunMole"
I am convinced that the "young adults", not "kids" who have appeared on National TV have a prepared "script". Therefore, therefore there should be the number of inconsistnecises we heard.


Apparently you haven't met our little Dash.

No scripts, Cancun. You're reaching here.


What many of you may not be understanding is that the AL teens that went on TV did not have scripts. Actually just the opposite that I would defer to arlee to explain if she wishes. It has been researched and backed up by calls that I have made.

Maybe the teens that everyone wants to hear from would go on the MSM shows if they were treated with respect and told the truth. These teens committed no crime yet they are sometimes given a harder time than they actual suspects in this case.

Do not confuse nervousness and bewilderment with inconsistencies.


Delayed reaction; Right. Not only have I listened to Dash/Alana  (see my previous comments on ED) put I've watched the frantic postings of her mother, first as arbeej and now as arlee. I this a frantic mmother attempting recognition for her daughter? I don't know about the rest of you, but having tutored someone inCalculsuor anyhting else, never made me someoon's "closee friend". you?


...my take?  I know none of these peeps...You more than I...

If you recommend this...then I'll look to the CancunMole... (so tell me CancunMole)...

Whitney

Whitney: You are a respected posted. All I ask is that you, and others, check what I'm questioning, that's all.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: CancunMole on June 26, 2005, 04:44:30 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "TTownMike"
Quote from: "CancunMole"
Quote from: "Red"
Quote from: "writenow"
Quote from: "CancunMole"
I am convinced that the "young adults", not "kids" who have appeared on National TV have a prepared "script". Therefore, therefore there should be the number of inconsistnecises we heard.


Apparently you haven't met our little Dash.

No scripts, Cancun. You're reaching here.


What many of you may not be understanding is that the AL teens that went on TV did not have scripts. Actually just the opposite that I would defer to arlee to explain if she wishes. It has been researched and backed up by calls that I have made.

Maybe the teens that everyone wants to hear from would go on the MSM shows if they were treated with respect and told the truth. These teens committed no crime yet they are sometimes given a harder time than they actual suspects in this case.

Do not confuse nervousness and bewilderment with inconsistencies.


SORRY RED, I don''t believe that! I BELIEVE THAT ALL OF THEM WHO WERE ON THIS TRIP WERE IN FACT GIVEN A SCRIPT TO FOLLOW.

LOL! ROFLMAO!  cancun?????  SEEK TREATMENT!  NOW!


You mean a script like that possibly bogus or not email supposedly from Deepak?  Now THERE was a script.  Only thing, his mother must not have gotten her copy.  She said Natalee did not speak one word to the boys, not one word and he said in that she said all kinds of ridiculous things.

So if they all say the same thing, it has to be a script instead of the truth?  All 140 of them?  I would thin some would tell if that happened.  A group that large could never keep any kind of secret.  That makes no sense for just like Deepak's mom, somebody would not get their copy or would not keep it straight.  But there are plenty of articles in newspapers quoting various kids.  What normal kid would spent their vacation monitoring Natalee, looking for aberant behavior, anyway?  Yes, girls talk but not when there is nothing to tell.  Joren was not in the same league as these kids and back home, would not have been anybody that I think NH would have wanted to even be seen with let alone have some torrid affair.

There is a good post previously on "carving out" which is the term the locals use in that region for separating a vulnerable female from her group by just sort of jostling her away from them into a car while in a crowd.  

But I don't see what your child-rearing practices have to do with any of this and do not follow your line of thought at all.  Who is blaming a country for something that can't be fixed?  Nothing is going to bring her back but should not others be given the warning?  18 is still considered a minor in this country, thus kids, they cannot vote or drink legally here at that age.  We even have many counties in this state that are called dry because alcohol is not sold but you can have it in your home, just have to buy it elsewhere but what does that have to do with anything?  These KIDS are as well reared as any anywhere.  Are you implyin that her disappearance has to do with her upbringing?  I surely hope not.


No. I mean little MB puppets, speaking about what they were told would be Ok. Sorry and spare me: Jug indicated that his own kids had gone to Aruba 3 yrs. ago and C&C was wild then. So, why were the "kids" from MB at C&C every night despite the fact that they had all inclusive at the HI"and "knew hoow bad C&C was?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: waited_too_long on June 26, 2005, 04:48:10 AM
Quote from: "CancunMole"
Quote from: "puggywug"
Quote from: "CancunMole"
Delayed reaction; Right. Not only have I listened to Dash (see my previous comments on ED) put I've watched the frantic postings of her mother, first as arbeej and now as arlee. I this a frantic mmother attempting recognition for her daughter? I don't know about the rest of you, but having tutored someone inCalculsuor anyhting else, never made me someoon's "closee friend". you?

To my recollection, Dash never claimed to be close friends with Natalee.[/quote

Watch again. Personally, I could give a sweet s---.   But, don't lie to me then expect me to believe all the rest . Lo ciento.


From show transcript Alana Jordan

O'REILLY: Were you a close friend of Natalee?
JORDAN: She's pretty much the reason I passed calculus. Yes.
O'REILLY: All right, so you know her very well?
JORDAN: Yes.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Microcephalic on June 26, 2005, 04:54:42 AM
Quote from: "sb"
ONE last post and I am going to bed.

The reason many of us want more info from the MB kids is because there are people out there trying to smear her and we want ammunition to counter that.

I REFUSE TO BELIEVE that she was carrying out any secret liaisons with Joran during the trip. I REFUSE TO BELIEVE that she "came on" to him that Sunday night. I REFUSE TO BELIEVE that she left that bar with intentions of consensual sexual activity.

AND I REFUSE TO BELIEVE THAT JORAN DID NOT PREMEDITATE PICKING HER UP AND DID NOT HAVE THE THING PLANNED FROM THE GET-GO.

Anything that hints at any of those situations, I want to be able to shoot down with FACTS.


Good night. Pray for Natalee and her family!


Actually, in an interview with 2 of the students on the trip on FOX they described the interaction of Natalee and Joran in the Casino earlier in the evening.  They stated that she approached Joran at the blackjack table and that Joran appeared to have no interest in her prior to this.  They also stated that it was she who asked Joran if he would be going to C&C's and Joran was a first reluctant to do so.  It suggests to me that this was the first time that they met and that Joran had no sinister plan, at least not at this time, involving Natalee.  The statements made during this interview by the students are scarily similar to the account given in the supposed Deepak e-mail; that this was the first time that they met and that it was Natalee who approached Joran.  I'm not in any way shifting blame to Natalee for what happened, other than being an irresponsible teenager.  It does speak to the lack of any premeditation on Joran's part though.  Whether that changed after he left the Casino I cannot say.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: TTownMike on June 26, 2005, 04:57:39 AM
The story bout the tree is sposed to mean that just because no one (besides Urine etals) was there to hear her screams, does that mean that the crime did not happen?!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: mojo on June 26, 2005, 04:58:25 AM
but Dash says there weren't really close in her post here - so why didn't she say that to O'Reilly?



Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 1:25 am    
Yeah, Ive known her for a few years, but we werent really close until this year. She's an amazing person... she's the reason I was able to pass Calculus! I cant wait till she gets home. I really think when she does, she should get help for whatever she's been through and then write a book. The girl's a serious genius.[/b]


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: CancunMole on June 26, 2005, 04:59:05 AM
Quote from: "waited_too_long"
Quote from: "CancunMole"
Quote from: "puggywug"
Quote from: "CancunMole"
Delayed reaction; Right. Not only have I listened to Dash (see my previous comments on ED) put I've watched the frantic postings of her mother, first as arbeej and now as arlee. I this a frantic mmother attempting recognition for her daughter? I don't know about the rest of you, but having tutored someone inCalculsuor anyhting else, never made me someoon's "closee friend". you?

To my recollection, Dash never claimed to be close friends with Natalee.[/quote

Watch again. Personally, I could give a sweet s---.   But, don't lie to me then expect me to believe all the rest . Lo ciento.


From show transcript Alana Jordan

Watched and answered: She got me thru Calculus just doesn't do for me  F(x)= ?????????? Have a Clue??, bet Joran does......

O'REILLY: Were you a close friend of Natalee?
JORDAN: She's pretty much the reason I passed calculus. Yes.
O'REILLY: All right, so you know her very well?
JORDAN: Yes.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: TTownMike on June 26, 2005, 05:00:38 AM
Quote from: "mojo"
but Dash says there weren't really close in her post here - so why didn't she say that to O'Reilly?



Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 1:25 am    
Yeah, Ive known her for a few years, but we werent really close until this year. She's an amazing person... she's the reason I was able to pass Calculus! I cant wait till she gets home. I really think when she does, she should get help for whatever she's been through and then write a book. The girl's a serious genius.[/b]


Look closer!  "until this year"!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: KerinTX on June 26, 2005, 05:01:22 AM
[/quote]
Mike, excuse me but I don't think you know me well enough to make those assumptions! I have sat here night after night and watched you call people all kinds of sick names! I don't know if you find them humorous, but I sure don't.
I am not saying ANYTHING negative about Natalee! The only reason that I got involved in this in the first place was because of how she was described. She reminds me of my own daughter, good kid, good grades, never in trouble, etc. I think the only mistake she made was being nice to someone. I know how some like to make fun of the southerners in here. Well, here is a good one for you.........they are taught not to be rude. So, sometimes they come across as being too friendly. I can personally see my own daughter doing the same thing. So, before you make your nasty remarks to me, get to know me better.
Thank you very much![/quote]
Sun, I am up late, trying to catch up on info in the forum and I ran across your verbal ping-pong match with Mike. I can honestly say that I have never heard him call anyone "sick names"! Are you sure you have the correct person?? But if he did call you anything (which I doubt) reading what you said to HIM would most definitely be a case of the "pot calling the kettle black". (as us Southerners like to say, sotaspeak)  :D


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: mojo on June 26, 2005, 05:02:29 AM
Quote from: "TTownMike"
Quote from: "mojo"
but Dash says there weren't really close in her post here - so why didn't she say that to O'Reilly?



Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 1:25 am    
Yeah, Ive known her for a few years, but we werent really close until this year. She's an amazing person... she's the reason I was able to pass Calculus! I cant wait till she gets home. I really think when she does, she should get help for whatever she's been through and then write a book. The girl's a serious genius.[/b]


Look closer!  "until this year"!


THANK YOU - just got some coffee.....my mistake!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Sobelle on June 26, 2005, 05:03:00 AM
Quote from: "TTownMike"
The story bout the tree is sposed to mean that just because no one (besides Urine etals) was there to hear her screams, does that mean that the crime did not happen?!


Point taken and understood.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: TTownMike on June 26, 2005, 05:03:58 AM
Quote from: "KerinTX"

Mike, excuse me but I don't think you know me well enough to make those assumptions! I have sat here night after night and watched you call people all kinds of sick names! I don't know if you find them humorous, but I sure don't.
I am not saying ANYTHING negative about Natalee! The only reason that I got involved in this in the first place was because of how she was described. She reminds me of my own daughter, good kid, good grades, never in trouble, etc. I think the only mistake she made was being nice to someone. I know how some like to make fun of the southerners in here. Well, here is a good one for you.........they are taught not to be rude. So, sometimes they come across as being too friendly. I can personally see my own daughter doing the same thing. So, before you make your nasty remarks to me, get to know me better.
Thank you very much![/quote]
Sun, I am up late, trying to catch up on info in the forum and I ran across your verbal ping-pong match with Mike. I can honestly say that I have never heard him call anyone "sick names"! Are you sure you have the correct person?? But if he did call you anything (which I doubt) reading what you said to HIM would most definitely be a case of the "pot calling the kettle black". (as us Southerners like to say, sotaspeak)  :D[/quote]Well, thanks fer that!  Where'd you come from?  She thinks I'm bad! I may not sleep tonight!



Jes kiddin! But thanks Kerin!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: EdwinW on June 26, 2005, 05:15:30 AM
Quote from: "sb"
Anyone else getting the idea that the ATTORNEYS are trying to spread disinformation and confusion? I am very skeptical of anything they say. It's like "controlled leaking" of what they want out there and it IS confusing.

Under Dutch law an attorney would try to protect the suspect. He would not say things that can harm his client. And he is not allowed to speak freely as this can hurt the investigation.

And I'm sure you (and many others) would love to know everything Joran said so far, but this would be impossible.

Btw, do not trust everything they say on Fox News.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: CancunMole on June 26, 2005, 05:15:46 AM
Quote from: "writenow"
Quote from: "CancunMole"
Delayed reaction; Right. Not only have I listened to Dash/Alana  (see my previous comments on ED) put I've watched the frantic postings of her mother, first as arbeej and now as arlee. I this a frantic mmother attempting recognition for her daughter? I don't know about the rest of you, but having tutored someone inCalculsuor anyhting else, never made me someoon's "closee friend". you?


Well, Dash certainly knows Natalee a heck of a lot better than you do, but you've managed to take pot shots at both of them. So are you friends or family of those sitting in jail now? Is that your agenda? Just trying to get your friends out of jail? Fully believe in their innocence in spite of the fact that they keep changing their stories and a person is missing? And lets not forget how they didn't particularly mind fingering two guards to take the rap for them. Upstanding citizens!


I am none of the above. I am an individual who belives that anyone is innocent until proved guilty I also believe that Dash/Alana  and her mother have an ulterior mootive. I live in NH (live free or die) and as far as I am concerned, there are people in ALA who should either be supporting what  they've bliindly said  or providing some real proof.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: mojo on June 26, 2005, 05:23:04 AM
Edwin - your location sounds similar to my own.

Apparently in holland as in france, there is some sort of thing as an attorney of instruction - basically a guy that handles the paperwork and court hearings etc. Speaking with a Dutch friend of mine and trying to explain this situation, he said that this is how the current attorneys appeared to him - not much access to their clients but doing all the legal work at this stage until they are charged?? does this make sense to you


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: JolietteGA on June 26, 2005, 05:28:46 AM
Thank you for allowing me to become part of this discussion.

Has anyone figured out what PVDS said in the interview to incriminate himself?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Shell on June 26, 2005, 05:33:09 AM
Dash was here earlier in the day, and made of point of clarifying that she was NOT a close friend of Natalies. I think Dash and her mom are truely upset, as we all are, that a vibrant young girl is missing without a trace.


Title: CnC's kitchen schedule
Post by: LouLou on June 26, 2005, 05:36:27 AM
Quote from: "Selena"
THe first reports said she went to the BOYZIIMEN concert, and then out to eat at CnC's. I'm not sure of the timeline.


CnC's stops serving food at ll p.m.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: waited_too_long on June 26, 2005, 05:38:16 AM
Quote from: "Shell"
Dash was here earlier in the day, and made of point of clarifying that she was NOT a close friend of Natalies. I think Dash and her mom are truely upset, as we all are, that a vibrant young girl is missing without a trace.


Thanks for that update. Who is she posting as? I have not seen any posts from --- since just before the Gretta VS interview on the 20th.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: CancunMole on June 26, 2005, 05:40:03 AM
Quote from: "TTownMike"
Quote from: "puggywug"
Quote from: "CancunMole"
Delayed reaction; Right. Not only have I listened to Dash (see my previous comments on ED) put I've watched the frantic postings of her mother, first as arbeej and now as arlee. I this a frantic mmother attempting recognition for her daughter? I don't know about the rest of you, but having tutored someone inCalculsuor anyhting else, never made me someoon's "closee friend". you?

To my recollection, Dash never claimed to be close friends with Natalee.


Well, Dash(if ya thankaboutit) was purty dadgum spercific in describing her relationship with Nat!  And I for one would develop a purty good feelin about anyone I spend that much time with!  I blieve Dash!


Oh then, I am blind.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Shell on June 26, 2005, 05:41:53 AM
I forgot the nic... :?  but i thought it was dash, saying she wanted to clarify it that she was not a close friend. Gawd i read so much today...i could be wrong..but someone said it..sheesh...and my brain thought it was dash... :oops:


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: JolietteGA on June 26, 2005, 05:47:07 AM
This may have been said, but I think that it wasn't what PVDS said in the interview, but what his wife said during the interview.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: waited_too_long on June 26, 2005, 05:48:00 AM
Quote from: "Shell"
I forgot the nic... :?  but i thought it was dash, saying she wanted to clarify it that she was not a close friend. Gawd i read so much today...i could be wrong..but someone said it..sheesh...and my brain thought it was dash... :oops:


Thanks for your clarification. It seems -- from her Mom's comments -- that she felt somewhat blindsided by that interview and has not posted here since.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: mojo on June 26, 2005, 05:50:22 AM
according an interview FOX did - with Justice Minister Rudy Croes PVDS has been detained to pressure Joran. you can find it here.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,160699,00.html


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: EdwinW on June 26, 2005, 05:57:44 AM
Quote from: "Selena"
I have a gov report by a committe expressing concerns that 16-18 y.o.'s can be tried as adults according to the nature of the crime. Unless the laws have he could be tried as an adult relative to the nature of the charge, like in US.


That's true. Under some circumstances it is possible for 16 and 17 year old children to be punished as adults. That is sometimes possible (not always) when it concerns murder.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: EdwinW on June 26, 2005, 06:23:28 AM
Quote from: "mojo"
Edwin - your location sounds similar to my own.

Apparently in holland as in france, there is some sort of thing as an attorney of instruction - basically a guy that handles the paperwork and court hearings etc.


:lol:  .... well .... it is some kind of joke (bad joke, I know). I do not live in Kopenhagen (country of Denmark) nor do I live in Paris (country of France). My personal experience (been in the US three times) is that some (or most?) people do not know where to find The Netherlands in Europe :-).

Quote from: "mojo"
Speaking with a Dutch friend of mine and trying to explain this situation, he said that this is how the current attorneys appeared to him - not much access to their clients but doing all the legal work at this stage until they are charged?? does this make sense to you


I'm not sure exactly with this case, but sometimes an attorney is the only person who may visit a suspect. That's to prevent that one or more people who might be involved, tries to spread some information that could interfere with the investigation.  That is also the reason why you do not hear many details about Joran van der S. and his friends. I am not sure how this goes in the US, but in The Netherlands it is not allowed to publish many details about an investigation (the police will simply not give you this kind of information as this is the same with NH). And I do understand that this situation probably doesn't make sense for US citizens when I read all these comments on this forum.

At this very moment, one of our most famous soccer players (Robin van Persie @ http://edition.cnn.com/2005/SPORT/football/06/16/arsenal.vanpersie.reut/index.html) is held in custody for raping an 21 year old girl. Everyone knows this soccer player. And as stated earlier, only a few fact are brought to the media (officially we still do not know the name of this girl). During investigation, there are NO comments on this rape and his attorney is the ONLY one who may visit him in jail.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: mojo on June 26, 2005, 06:36:13 AM
thanks for your answer, Edwin - know holland well and have been going there regularly for nearly 30 years.   even the fortuyn, van gogh and fireworks explosions didn't get this much attention.

the media frenzy that typifies the american press these days is spear headed by murdoch - he does it with FOX in the US, his papers in the UK and australia. can china and india be far behind. i see he's even visiting putin today...heaven help us all.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: roxyluv on June 26, 2005, 06:40:57 AM
Morning everyone, is there any news or updates from the Texas group yet?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Microcephalic on June 26, 2005, 06:41:56 AM
The suppsed Deepak e-mail may contain a cover story, that being that the three boys dropped Natalee off at the HI, but it is just too close to the truth not to be taken seriously.  It has been cooberated by several students on the trip, second hand accounts as relayed by Deepak’s and Joran’s mother and other facts.  If it was not written by Deepak, it was written by someone with detailed knowledge of what happened that night.

I believe the account given in the e-mail, with exception of the dropping NH off at the HI is more or less accurate.  NH met Joran at the blackjack table at the HI Casino the evening that she disappeared.  She approached him and asked her to place some bets for her.  She more or less invited him to go to C&C’s later that evening.  On these events the interview with 2 students, who were in the Casino at the time, and description given in the e-mail are identical.

We then have Joran at McD’s calling for a ride home.  Much has been said about this.  How did he get there?  Why did he go there?  I don’t think it really matters.  His cell phone would not work in the Casino so he probably walked over and had a Big Mac while he waiting for his father to pick him up.  In any case, Joran returns home and makes arrangements with the Kalpoe boys to go to C&C’s.   Much has also been said regarding this.  These boys must be evil and up to no good to sneak out on a school night and go to a bar, right?  I don’t think anything more is required than Joran just met a cute American girl who apparently came on to him or at least invited him to go to C&C’s, he liked her and he wanted to go.

So Joran, Deepak and Satish head over to C&C’s in DEEPAK’s car.  This is important given that Joran’s families cars wer later seized but no mention of Deepak’s car being seized.  Perhaps I missed that.  In any case, Natalee is already there, appearing to be somewhat under the influence, having a good time, but not appearing to be on some harder drug(s).  It is already close to closing by the time the boys get there so they quickly order a round of drinks before last call.  This makes the date rape drug theory even more unlikely.  The bar closes and the students head back to the hotel.  Natalee, who is described as coherent by other students, leaves voluntarily with the boys.  She is seen by other students who apparently call for her to get out of the car, a fact confirmed by the e-mail and student accounts and Deepak gives her that opportunity.

So we have the four of them cruising in Deepak’s car.  The boy’s stories and the e-mail suggest that they drove to the lighthouse.  I don’t think it is important whether they did or did not.  If a sinister plan had been hatched by the boys at this point then it is unlikely that the Kalpoe’s would have dropped Natalee and Joran off anywhere alone.  They would obviously have stayed with him.  And yet they did not.  Why would Joran be calling and text messaging Deepak and hour or so later for a ride home if they had not dropped him off somewhere earlier?  If they were involved with some sort of plot it seems likely that they would have stayed with Joran and done whatever they planned to do.  The fact that they did drop them off suggests to me that their involvement in this is limited to the fact that they attempted to help Joran hide something.  That is why they are in jail.  This has been confirmed by Marianne Croes who has stated yesterday that they are being held because their “stories did not check out”.  In fact she made the same statement regarding all of the suspects.

So Joran and Natalee are dropped off at the beach.  The  Marriot beach seems likely.  It is close to the HI and is private.  What happens now is anyone’s guess however it is clear that the Kalpoes are not involved.  By the way, the security guard, who did not lie and had no reason to lie and is now free as a result also confirms these events having heard one of the Kalpoes stating that he never should have dropped Natalee off alone with Joran.

There are many theories regarding what happened on the beach and only one person that can possibly shed any light on that, perhaps two if Natalee is still alive, or more if others were involved.  In any case I believe that Joran had no premeditated plan to do anything at that point other than to perhaps have sex with this girl.  It is possible that he murdered her but I think this is unlikely.  It does not seem like he would have to resort to rape to make love to women.  He is a young, some, apparently including Natalee, would say he is attractive, any lives in a place where thousands of young girls come through every week.  Rape or attempted rape and fear of prosecution thereof would be the only motive that I can envision but I just don’t see it.  It would have been her word against his and she went with him voluntarily.

Some kind of accident is more likely.  If this is the case then Joran has made the mistake of his life as he should have, called for help,  reported it and told the truth.  And why wouldn’t he?  Because he had sex with her?  No likely.  He could have just said it was consensual and if he did perhaps it was.  If she had died there would have been no one to dispute him.  Because he drugged her?  Also not likely.  He does not seem to have had the opportunity to do this or at least very little opportunity.  If there was an accident he covered it up he did it because he was stupid.

Perhaps Joran’s only crime is that he is a complete asshole and left a drunk passed out girl on the beach and then lied about it.  And parties unkonwn  are responsible for her disappearance.  Steve Croes?  His connection to this case is totally unknown.  It is anyone’s guess without facts.  And facts are clearly not readily available to us or to the police.  Agaian, Marianne Croes has stated that all 5 suspects are being held because their stories didn’t check out.  Not because we have clear evidence to suspect them of the crime.  This is unfortunate.  Joran may or may not hold the key.  Without a body or any clear evidence that a crime has been commited I would not be surprised to see any or all of these people released this morning except for the pressure being placed on the police to solve this disappearance and place the blame on someone.  I hope she is found, dead or alive.  It is a big Island with lots of dessert and coastline.  Not very difficult for someone to dispose of a body.  The search and recovery people have their work cut out for them.


Title: good morning
Post by: momto5 on June 26, 2005, 06:42:37 AM
Morning everyone. Have there been any new developments or anything since last night? I was on last night for a couple of hours reading but didnt post...so just wondering whats going on.
Thanks  :D


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: MiamiMe on June 26, 2005, 06:44:58 AM
Quote from: "mojo"
but Dash says there weren't really close in her post here - so why didn't she say that to O'Reilly?



Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 1:25 am    
Yeah, Ive known her for a few years, but we werent really close until this year. She's an amazing person... she's the reason I was able to pass Calculus! I cant wait till she gets home. I really think when she does, she should get help for whatever she's been through and then write a book. The girl's a serious genius.[/b]


She said they weren't realy close UNTIL this year. I'm sure they became friends after the tutorials......

*Folks ANYBODY can POST as someone else ONLINE!

You got Igcognito saying that the father ISSS a judge when he's not a judge. An Aruban Judge was on Fox last night and stated that the father FAILED the test. Take everyone with a grain of salt ONLINE until they show some FACTS to back it up.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: mojo on June 26, 2005, 06:46:17 AM
no developments roxyluv and momto5 - but i'm getting the feeling that they're stalled.

rudy croes apparently said on FOX last night in an interview that PVDS was brought in to pressure Joran. i didn't see it, but that's what the article on their site says. :cry:


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: momto5 on June 26, 2005, 06:54:39 AM
Quote from: "mojo"
no developments roxyluv and momto5 - but i'm getting the feeling that they're stalled.

rudy croes apparently said on FOX last night in an interview that PVDS was brought in to pressure Joran. i didn't see it, but that's what the article on their site says. :cry:


Yes I saw the interview also. I honestly dont think Rudy Croes knows whats going on and was simply speculating. I found it bothersome though that anyone would be brought in simply to pressure their child. I dont think PVDS is going to be forth coming at all, and from all "inside sources" he isnt. he knows the laws, even if he wasnt a judge he studied the ins and outs of them, and obviously would know his rights during interrogation. Myself I think it was kinda lame to arrest him. They might have gotten more info if in fact he is involved by continuing to tail him and bug his house. You cant tell me they didnt know he would stop talking once arrested? Atleast he was talking on camera before. Again JMO


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: roxyluv on June 26, 2005, 06:55:51 AM
So they arested Papa just to put pressure on Joran sounds a little unethical.
So they have no suspicion that papa may be involved, it almost sounds like if they do find out the truth all those involved will walk because the lawyers will throw everything out.
I now the laws are different there but...


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: pinemeadows on June 26, 2005, 06:57:31 AM
Quote from: "roxyluv"
Morning everyone, is there any news or updates from the Texas group yet?


Morning...there's a brief update on Page 31....nothing startling.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: pinemeadows on June 26, 2005, 07:00:19 AM
Quote from: "momto5"
They might have gotten more info if in fact he is involved by continuing to tail him and bug his house. You cant tell me they didnt know he would stop talking once arrested? Atleast he was talking on camera before. Again JMO


They must have learned something, as I heard (in this very forum, and we all know there's nothing but TRUTH here!) that he has been under surveillance.  I don't know why at this point they decided to move and arrest him....they must have something pretty convincing of his involvement.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: roxyluv on June 26, 2005, 07:00:21 AM
Thanks pinemeadows


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: mojo on June 26, 2005, 07:01:41 AM
Quote from: "roxyluv"
So they arested Papa just to put pressure on Joran sounds a little unethical.
So they have no suspicion that papa may be involved, it almost sounds like if they do find out the truth all those involved will walk because the lawyers will throw everything out.
I now the laws are different there but...


yep, still as much in the dark as ever, but if their method gets to the bottom of things - then i'm all for it. everyone who was lambasting officials didn't take into account the draconian methods which can be used apparently.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: momto5 on June 26, 2005, 07:04:38 AM
Quote from: "pinemeadows"
Quote from: "momto5"
They might have gotten more info if in fact he is involved by continuing to tail him and bug his house. You cant tell me they didnt know he would stop talking once arrested? Atleast he was talking on camera before. Again JMO


They must have learned something, as I heard (in this very forum, and we all know there's nothing but TRUTH here!) that he has been under surveillance.  I don't know why at this point they decided to move and arrest him....they must have something pretty convincing of his involvement.

Well I certainly hope they do. I have family that works for law enforcement here in the states (Chief of police, probation, clerks, paralegals etc) and they all made the statement about his arrest is why I brought it up. My aunt for instance was once involved with a case where a sheriff killed his wife and hid her body. They waited until they had clear and convincing evidence to bring him in. She stated later they told her they waited because they knew he knew the laws, and would be hard to "crack" w/out convincing evidence to show him. Everyone knew he was guilty as sin (his gun was missing, he was last seen with her, odd behavior etc but all circumstantial really). So I really hope maybe it was something along the same lines leading to PVDS arrest.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: mojo on June 26, 2005, 07:08:56 AM
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6308419/

• June 24, 2005 | 6:25 p.m. ET

Aruba's justice system (Brian Cohen, Abrams Report Producer)

I've been on the hot and sunny island of Aruba now for 5 days and I must admit what I've seen happen in the last day or so is amazing.  The culture and the justice system down here is very different from ours.  Yesterday’s developments opened my eyes to how things are done down here… very quickly and with no information as to why something is happening.

I spoke with Anita van der Sloot an hour before her husband Paul was arrested.  She was distraught because she had been waiting for two hours just to see her son, but confirmed to me that she would in fact be a guest on "The Abrams Report."  When news came that her husband had been arrested I called her.  Not only did Anita van der Sloot answer, but she said she was so upset that she needed to come on the show to tell people what happened.  The problem in Aruba  is that we don’t know what happened, and we can’t get answers to our questions.  Not even Anita van der Sloot knows why her husband was arrested.

I, along with other NBC folks, was the only media allowed to stay at her home and I must admit I feel bad for Anita van der Sloot.  I don't know why her husband was arrested, but to have your son and your husband arrested and get no answers must be hard.  At the last minute Anita van der Sloot came up to me crying and said she just could not make the interview, and that she was truly sorry for putting me in this situation.  Maybe her son knows more and maybe her husband knows something, but I must say I was impressed with this woman's attitude.  Now once again all we can do it wait to see what will happen


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: roxyluv on June 26, 2005, 07:11:48 AM
Maybe someone who knows the justice system there can explain is it possible that the lawyers can throw out all confessions because of their treatment and as the boys lawyers said it is unusual that they are not getting the information or to be allowed access to their clients during interrogations.
As a courttv junkie and being in a jury before this whole case would be thrown out


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: pinemeadows on June 26, 2005, 07:20:59 AM
Here's some info on PVDS - was on Riehl World...

"Some biographical information about PVDS from a Dutch newspaper internetsite (www.ad.nl, "Van magistraat tot verdachte van moord"):
- he was born in The Netherlands, lived there from his birth in 1952 to 1993;
- he became a lawyer; he was known as a hardliner, a person also that never gives up;
- in 1993 he went with his family (wife and two sons Joran and Valentijn) to Aruba and worked there as a juridical employee for the State; on Aruba a third son is born: Sebastiaan;
- later he became assistent of the General Prosecutioner on Aruba;
- in 2003 (or 2002?) he started a training for judge, still on Aruba; from March 2004 to March 2005 he followed the judgetraining in The Netherlands; but he apparently failed; back on Aruba in March 2005 he doesn't continue his training."

The "apparently failed" statement has been confirmed by the Justice Minister.


Title: 3 missing things
Post by: momto5 on June 26, 2005, 07:22:39 AM
Last night on the news they had said they were missing 3 things, and once they had them they would know more or something to that effect. I saw it posted here and some questions over what those 3 things might be. I actually thought about it awhile last night and my husband and I discussed it. I believe 2 of the things "missing" are obvious, 1. a body and 2 a crime scene. I cant imagine the 3rd, maybe a motive?
Any ideas?


Title: Re: 3 missing things
Post by: pinemeadows on June 26, 2005, 07:24:04 AM
Quote from: "momto5"
I believe 2 of the things "missing" are obvious, 1. a body and 2 a crime scene. I cant imagine the 3rd, maybe a motive?
Any ideas?


I suppose either a weapon or the manner in which the victim was murdered.


Title: Re: 3 missing things
Post by: sandraK on June 26, 2005, 07:31:10 AM
Quote from: "pinemeadows"
Quote from: "momto5"
I believe 2 of the things "missing" are obvious, 1. a body and 2 a crime scene. I cant imagine the 3rd, maybe a motive?
Any ideas?


I suppose either a weapon or the manner in which the victim was murdered.

we know  When..So it's
WHO.. What and Where..!!!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: pinemeadows on June 26, 2005, 07:33:05 AM
Isn't the court hearing set for just an hour from now?

I haven't turned on tv yet today, but I suppose the MSM is camped in front of the courthouse.

Since we're a small group this a.m., any thoughts on who, if any, will be released?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Ting on June 26, 2005, 07:33:38 AM
I had said earlier that I hoped that both Mrs VDS and Mrs Kalpoe had arranged to have their other children, as well as any elders, dispatched to an undisclosed location away from Aruba, the Netherlands, or the United States.

I am sorry to say that while I know it would be devastating for the mothers themselves to leave their loved ones currently held in jail, for the sake of their younger children, and in the case of Mrs. Kalpoe, also the elderly grandmother, that they accompany their remaining family members.

They can be no help to the imprisoned ones if they themselves are seized.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: EdwinW on June 26, 2005, 07:34:37 AM
Quote from: "inspector_detector"


Well let's recount the "evidence" against the 2 security guards.

1. Natalee is missing - therefore you are accused of kidnapping and murder

2. The party boys said she was approached by a black security guard - you guys are black security guards - you're under arrest.


I'm sorry, but this in no hard evidence.
The fact is that NH is missing. BUT that does not mean she is murdered. As long as her body is still not found, we can only guess what might happened. Until now none of the suspects admitted they actually murdered NH.

Quote from: "inspector_detector"

All I can say is that I'm thankfull I don't live in Aruba, or the Netherlands...


Guantanamo Bay (http://www.guantanamo.com): hundreds of suspects, no visits, no attorneys, humiliation, torture and abuse. Thank you.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: momto5 on June 26, 2005, 07:36:42 AM
Quote from: "Ting"
I had said earlier that I hoped that both Mrs VDS and Mrs Kalpoe had arranged to have their other children, as well as any elders, dispatched to an undisclosed location away from Aruba, the Netherlands, or the United States.

I am sorry to say that while I know it would be devastating for the mothers themselves to leave their loved ones currently held in jail, for the sake of their younger children, and in the case of Mrs. Kalpoe, also the elderly grandmother, that they accompany their remaining family members.

They can be no help to the imprisoned ones if they themselves are seized.

I completely agree. There are other children involved at this point, and the members behind bars do have lawyers. It is hard to leave your children behind I know this first hand, but sometimes needed to protect your other kids.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: pinemeadows on June 26, 2005, 07:37:53 AM
Quote from: "EdwinW"
Guantanamo Bay[/url]: hundreds of suspects, no visits, no attorneys, humiliation, torture and abuse. Thank you.[/u][/size]


Give it a rest re: the Guantanomo Bay issue/non-issue...this isn't the place.

Thank you.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: sandraK on June 26, 2005, 07:38:13 AM
Quote from: "pinemeadows"
Isn't the court hearing set for just an hour from now?

I haven't turned on tv yet today, but I suppose the MSM is camped in front of the courthouse.

Since we're a small group this a.m., any thoughts on who, if any, will be released?

IMHO..they will let my Pal Steve OUT .


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: momto5 on June 26, 2005, 07:38:33 AM
Quote from: "pinemeadows"
Quote from: "EdwinW"
Guantanamo Bay[/url]: hundreds of suspects, no visits, no attorneys, humiliation, torture and abuse. Thank you.[/u][/size]


Give it a rest re: the Guantanomo Bay issue/non-issue...this isn't the place.

Thank you.


Nicely said. Totally different issue...


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: momto5 on June 26, 2005, 07:39:47 AM
Quote from: "sandraK"
Quote from: "pinemeadows"
Isn't the court hearing set for just an hour from now?

I haven't turned on tv yet today, but I suppose the MSM is camped in front of the courthouse.

Since we're a small group this a.m., any thoughts on who, if any, will be released?

IMHO..they will let my Pal Steve OUT .

They said rumor has it Steve and Satish might be let out, or asked to be released. However who knows. Seems they can keep you as a material witness also in aruba if they want to. Which means they might not be released at all.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: pinemeadows on June 26, 2005, 07:39:50 AM
Quote from: "sandraK"
IMHO..they will let my Pal Steve OUT .


Could be...but if that's the case, there go all the theories revolving around a boat.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Herkimer on June 26, 2005, 07:44:39 AM
Guantanamo Bay[/url]: hundreds of suspects, no visits, no attorneys, humiliation, torture and abuse. Thank you.[/u][/size][/quote]

Perhaps they can all come and live with you, Mr. Terrorist Lover


Title: Microcephalic Reveiw
Post by: LouLou on June 26, 2005, 07:46:53 AM
Your review is very well thought out though there are some details that need polishing.

Posted so early in the morning, it is likely not to recieve the attention that it deserves.  

You might think about putting it in a separate thread so it won't get buried.

A couple of points of fact (?) I would point out.  
1. Depeck car was towed early on.  At the time many folks were assuming it was Joran's.  It was a late model honda civic with some custome tailights.

2. I still favor the story line that the bros. dropped Natalee off at his house.  Why would he wallow in the sand and bugs with a girl when he had a separate appartment to go to?  Later he called Depek to come get her and haul her home....this would mesh with the partial truth that they dropped her off.

3. Alternatively.... I've seen another interview where none of her roommates actually spent the night in that room, so nobody really knows if she got back or not. Yet if she was going to sneak in, couldn't she do it via that patio door? Sounds like it. And if she wanted to be dropped off somewhere that no one from the Alabama party at the hotel would see who was dropping her off, the next door Marriott certainly sounds like a good place to be dropped off at.

4.  Also Earlier articles, however, state that Joran was talking to her at C'nCs the 2nd night the group was there, and that's what caused the "scuffle".  Seeing that her classmates did not approve of her new love interest, the romance might have been on the down low from that point...with people who observed her on the last night only presuming that she was meeting him for the first time.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: EdwinW on June 26, 2005, 07:48:20 AM
Quote from: "mojo"
thanks for your answer, Edwin - know holland well and have been going there regularly for nearly 30 years.   even the fortuyn, van gogh and fireworks explosions didn't get this much attention.


I was in San Francisco when the fireworks explosion occurred. It was a rainy saturday morning when I went back to my hotel room, turned on the television and five minutes later I saw a short item on that on CNN. But that was the only item I saw. I had to see the rest at home.

The thing that supprises us here the most, is the fact that there is much media attention and the reactions on television and a forum like this.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: sandraK on June 26, 2005, 07:51:13 AM
Honda accourd..With "Body Kit"...very Low clearance.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Ting on June 26, 2005, 07:53:36 AM
Edwin at this point, it kind of surprises me too. My own interest was piqued by the level of US government involvement in the case, which is very unusual, as thousands of US nationals go missing abroad every year. I read somewhere around ten thousand a month.

I would have thought that all the factors that contributed to media attention initially would have died down by now.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: mojo on June 26, 2005, 08:02:47 AM
Quote from: "Ting"
Edwin at this point, it kind of surprises me too. My own interest was piqued by the level of US government involvement in the case, which is very unusual, as thousands of US nationals go missing abroad every year. I read somewhere around ten thousand a month.

I would have thought that all the factors that contributed to media attention initially would have died down by now.



american news always tends to be a bit insular. if it didn't happen in america or to an american it's a footnote.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: EdwinW on June 26, 2005, 08:07:35 AM
@Ting:
If you could read Dutch (I do not blame you for that :-) ), you could have read how stunned we are. As you said, it all a big suprise. I sincerely hope that NH will step into her hotel this day ...

One other thing (and that's why I wrote something about Guantanamo Bay earlier), we see many post, articles, news items about the Dutch system. We have a different system as in the US (not better or worse than many other system, but different). Many US citizens are now confronted by a system other than the one they already know and do not realize (or not enough) the differences between these systems.
Did you know that we will (almost) never expose the last name of a suspect and do not publish a clear picture of them ?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 26, 2005, 08:09:25 AM
Wow.. on FOx they said at the benefit yesterday in MB Alabama...they raised $25,000 in just 3 hours.. that is awesome!!!!!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: mojo on June 26, 2005, 08:12:19 AM
the trial by media business in the US has gotten way out of hand. neither the victim or alleged perpetrator is protected no matter what age they are.


Title: Re: Microcephalic Reveiw
Post by: Dallas Also on June 26, 2005, 08:20:26 AM
Quote from: "LouLou"
...4.  Also Earlier articles, however, state that Joran was talking to her at C'nCs the 2nd night the group was there, and that's what caused the "scuffle".  Seeing that her classmates did not approve of her new love interest, the romance might have been on the down low from that point...with people who observed her on the last night only presuming that she was meeting him for the first time.



The "scuffle" was a shouting match between Joran and Thomas Twitty.  Yes, Twitty.  Thomas Twitty is Natalee's step-cousin!!!

So actually, she had family that didn't approve of him right off the bat.  The shouting match happened on 6-29-05, which is the same day she went to C'nCs and then went missing.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Ting on June 26, 2005, 08:23:19 AM
I admit the cultural values are interesting, and in less deadly context, would be both funny and quaint.

mojo, I posted last night that I sometimes perceive a frustration on the part of some Americans with their justice system.

While the laws are very focused on a specific incident, did X do Y to Z on XX day, I wonder if the American mainstream would not be happier with a more comprehensive matrix, something like, has this person ever done something you think is bad?, does this person share your values?

Especially in some celebrity cases, I have seen a lot of acknowledgement that no, the state did not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant committed a specific crime in a specific instance, but very strong displeasure that he was not convicted anyway, just on general principle!

One of the things I like about the Dutch system, at least from what has been reported recently, is that after a certain amount of time suspects must be either formally charged or released.

on edit: fix typo


Title: Re: Microcephalic Reveiw
Post by: momto5 on June 26, 2005, 08:29:52 AM
Quote from: "Dallas Also"
Quote from: "LouLou"
...4.  Also Earlier articles, however, state that Joran was talking to her at C'nCs the 2nd night the group was there, and that's what caused the "scuffle".  Seeing that her classmates did not approve of her new love interest, the romance might have been on the down low from that point...with people who observed her on the last night only presuming that she was meeting him for the first time.



The "scuffle" was a shouting match between Joran and Thomas Twitty.  Yes, Twitty.  Thomas Twitty is Natalee's step-cousin!!!

So actually, she had family that didn't approve of him right off the bat.  The shouting match happened on 6-29-05, which is the same day she went to C'nCs and then went missing.


Dallas how did you find out it was one of her cousins? I appreciate you posting the info bc I had wondered who the scuffle was between. Its very interesting that it was a family member. That being said, I wonder what they didnt like about Joran? I also wonder what they told her mother about him. Very interesting.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: absolut on June 26, 2005, 08:31:08 AM
Morning all,

I feel like some of you this morning. 18 pages behind and not a clue in the world of whether I need to read them.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 26, 2005, 08:31:43 AM
Quote from: "absolut"
Morning all,

I feel like some of you this morning. 18 pages behind and not a clue in the world of whether I need to read them.


Morning!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: momto5 on June 26, 2005, 08:33:08 AM
Quote from: "absolut"
Morning all,

I feel like some of you this morning. 18 pages behind and not a clue in the world of whether I need to read them.

Good morning.
I only read 2 pages back lol.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Dallas Also on June 26, 2005, 08:33:30 AM
Quote from: "Shell"
I forgot the nic... :?  but i thought it was dash, saying she wanted to clarify it that she was not a close friend. Gawd i read so much today...i could be wrong..but someone said it..sheesh...and my brain thought it was dash... :oops:


Shell, it wasn't Dash, it was mbhs05.

mbhs05 was the first kid from MB to post here.  She did graduate with Natalee but she did not go on the Aruba trip (it was an expensive trip, $1450, and her family determined that they should spend the money elsewhere).

But mbhs05 lives down the block from Dash and that is how Dash learned about this chatboard and first posted here.  

Both these kids are upset and we post very carefully where they are concerned.  The Blame Game would get us nowhere, and the ones we post against are the ones that got Natalee.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Ting on June 26, 2005, 08:35:11 AM
My first guess would be that maybe Joran said something to her that the cousin felt was inappropriate, but if that were the case, it isn't likely that Natalee would have been seen dancing with Joran subsequent to that.

So what upset the cousin?

Another unanswered question to stuff in the box with all the others, if there's room.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 26, 2005, 08:35:44 AM
Off to watch FOX.. talk to yah guys/gals later!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: sandraK on June 26, 2005, 08:37:13 AM
on FOX in side of Jail. No bed. Just a potty and the  cement floor.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 26, 2005, 08:38:17 AM
Quote from: "sandraK"
on FOX in side of Jail. No bed. Just a potty and the  cement floor.


did you see that shower?  eweeeee... Looked like a trickle of water.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: roxyluv on June 26, 2005, 08:38:53 AM
Quote from: "sandraK"
on FOX in side of Jail. No bed. Just a potty and the  cement floor.


Are you serious?
Mind you if that was my daughter I would say yeah but on the other hand if it was son I would be pissed because how can someone get an honest confession with torture.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: gagirl on June 26, 2005, 08:39:54 AM
Did they actually say that NH was present and saw the "scuffle"? It could be the a flip comment was made about NH by JVDS that the cousin overheard and took offense to.
just my thoughts, as a southern gal.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: sandraK on June 26, 2005, 08:42:28 AM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "sandraK"
on FOX in side of Jail. No bed. Just a potty and the  cement floor.


did you see that shower?  eweeeee... Looked like a trickle of water.

And  Dirty.**Lawyer   said there were Rats & Bugs I belive Him NOW..


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: momto5 on June 26, 2005, 08:43:14 AM
Quote from: "gagirl"
Did they actually say that NH was present and saw the "scuffle"? It could be the a flip comment was made about NH by JVDS that the cousin overheard and took offense to.
just my thoughts, as a southern gal.

As a southerner myself (transplant but been here for 8 yrs lol), I would agree with your comment. It also could have been they were told to look out for her while there. Maybe they percieved him as arrogant as well, and just got into a bit of a match bc they didnt like him.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: momto5 on June 26, 2005, 08:44:04 AM
Quote from: "sandraK"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "sandraK"
on FOX in side of Jail. No bed. Just a potty and the  cement floor.


did you see that shower?  eweeeee... Looked like a trickle of water.

And  Dirty.**Lawyer   said there were Rats & Bugs I belive Him NOW..


makes you appreciate our jails doesnt it lol


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 26, 2005, 08:45:57 AM
Quote from: "momto5"
Quote from: "sandraK"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "sandraK"
on FOX in side of Jail. No bed. Just a potty and the  cement floor.


did you see that shower?  eweeeee... Looked like a trickle of water.

And  Dirty.**Lawyer   said there were Rats & Bugs I belive Him NOW..


makes you appreciate our jails doesnt it lol


I been on tours in some of our prisons here..and even Juvn detetention center.. I have never seen anything like that.!!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: HannieC on June 26, 2005, 08:47:17 AM
Hi all g`morning :D


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: momto5 on June 26, 2005, 08:47:51 AM
Quote from: "HannieC"
Hi all g`morning :D


Morning Hannie!  :D


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: absolut on June 26, 2005, 08:51:13 AM
I know I am perceived as the big fox fan, but let me tell you I hate the morning show more than I hate geraldo or Jamie Colby's stuff.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Dallas Also on June 26, 2005, 08:51:38 AM
Here is the blog from riehlworldview.com:

Regarding the Mountain Brook High students ...

It would appear that there were people watching out for Natalee.

Natalee's cousins Thomas and Hunter (twins) ... were on the Aruba trip. Thomas played poker with Joran on Sunday afternoon in the casino. Thomas was also instrumental in identifying Joran to Jug and Beth.

Also it is reported that the fight with Joran that occurred at Carlos'N Charlie's on the night that Natalee disappeared also involved Thomas.

It was apparently broken up by Carlos'N Charlie's security. Some say that if the fight had not been broken up, there might have been a much different outcome. Thomas is said to be quite an athlete.

At the time, other friends of hers expressed concern too, but were apparently appeased when Natalee waved to them.

Sean McVea (Natalee's ex-boyfriend) was also on the Aruba trip. He was with Natalee earlier in the day and has an ironic quote attributed to him. "We were all hanging out on the beach. She was laughing and looking so beautiful. She looked up into the blue sky and said how lucky we all were."


Posted by: Unknown | June 25, 2005 03:40 PM


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: gagirl on June 26, 2005, 08:52:46 AM
I heard Croes say this last night to Geraldo on Fox. This was quoted from FoxNews.com today:

In an anecdote that illustrated the insular world of Aruba, Justice Minister Croes said Paul van der Sloot had recently visited him in his office after failing to become a judge, apparently seeking a position in Croes' department.[/b]

Does anyone else think it strange that they are saying that PVDS was basically unemployed? Was this one reason his business computer was confiscated?

Sorry... waking up and having my coffee.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Dallas Also on June 26, 2005, 08:52:58 AM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Wow.. on FOx they said at the benefit yesterday in MB Alabama...they raised $25,000 in just 3 hours.. that is awesome!!!!!


I don't know if $25,000 is going to be enough.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: absolut on June 26, 2005, 08:54:45 AM
Quote from: "Dallas Also"
Here is the blog from riehlworldview.com:

Regarding the Mountain Brook High students ...

It would appear that there were people watching out for Natalee.

Natalee's cousins Thomas and Hunter (twins) ... were on the Aruba trip. Thomas played poker with Joran on Sunday afternoon in the casino. Thomas was also instrumental in identifying Joran to Jug and Beth.

Also it is reported that the fight with Joran that occurred at Carlos'N Charlie's on the night that Natalee disappeared also involved Thomas.

It was apparently broken up by Carlos'N Charlie's security. Some say that if the fight had not been broken up, there might have been a much different outcome. Thomas is said to be quite an athlete.

At the time, other friends of hers expressed concern too, but were apparently appeased when Natalee waved to them.

Sean McVea (Natalee's ex-boyfriend) was also on the Aruba trip. He was with Natalee earlier in the day and has an ironic quote attributed to him. "We were all hanging out on the beach. She was laughing and looking so beautiful. She looked up into the blue sky and said how lucky we all were."


Posted by: Unknown | June 25, 2005 03:40 PM


I guess this post would make more sense to me if Joran was missing or dead not Natalee. The comments over there just get better and better, but I am sure similar things are said about some of the stuff that goes on here.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Ting on June 26, 2005, 08:57:21 AM
I wish we knew what the scufle was about. Was it over poker? Or Natalee?

Either way, it seems like the cousin would have said something to her, like this guy is a jerk, stay away from him.

But there was at least one student who saw her dancing with him, and another who saw her walking with a tall guy that she believed was Joran.

Was the cousin at Carlos & Charlie (in solidarity with Greta :)  ) on that last night?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: absolut on June 26, 2005, 08:58:02 AM
Do clocks in Aruba mean anything?

It is almost 9am, the hearing was supposed to start at 8:30.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: sandraK on June 26, 2005, 08:58:50 AM
WE "Cough" They get a Tissue....LOL


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: absolut on June 26, 2005, 08:59:25 AM
It was brought up last night, why weren't the cousins brought right back to Aruba. Who better to walk through the events of the week.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: GeOrGiA on June 26, 2005, 08:59:57 AM
I know the topic of lie detectors has been discussed here before - I'll be the first to admit I haven't read every thread.  My question to anyone would be if the boys ARE finally telling the truth (i.e. the brothers dropped Joran and Natalee off at the beach, Joran says they were at the beach and he left her there) - why wouldn't they WANT to take a lie detector test to affirm that?  I know they're not admissible, but they are certainly used.  Is there some legal reason behind it not being requested by the boys and their family?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: momto5 on June 26, 2005, 09:01:30 AM
Quote from: "Dallas Also"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Wow.. on FOx they said at the benefit yesterday in MB Alabama...they raised $25,000 in just 3 hours.. that is awesome!!!!!


I don't know if $25,000 is going to be enough.

My understanding is they are being comped for their rooms. When my son was missing I had alot of donations and I was staying with a friend, so it cost me nothing while we were searching. I will say there are alot of behind the scenes costs you dont realize until you are placed in this sort of situation. Either way 25k seems like a good start, add to that the donations they are getting aside from this benefit. Hopefully itll be enough to cover expenses and loss of income.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: iquitos on June 26, 2005, 09:01:40 AM
Quote from: "CancunMole"
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "TTownMike"
Quote from: "CancunMole"
Quote from: "Red"
Quote from: "writenow"
Quote from: "CancunMole"
I am convinced that the "young adults", not "kids" who have appeared on National TV have a prepared "script". Therefore, therefore there should be the number of inconsistnecises we heard.


Apparently you haven't met our little Dash.

No scripts, Cancun. You're reaching here.


What many of you may not be understanding is that the AL teens that went on TV did not have scripts. Actually just the opposite that I would defer to arlee to explain if she wishes. It has been researched and backed up by calls that I have made.

Maybe the teens that everyone wants to hear from would go on the MSM shows if they were treated with respect and told the truth. These teens committed no crime yet they are sometimes given a harder time than they actual suspects in this case.

Do not confuse nervousness and bewilderment with inconsistencies.


SORRY RED, I don''t believe that! I BELIEVE THAT ALL OF THEM WHO WERE ON THIS TRIP WERE IN FACT GIVEN A SCRIPT TO FOLLOW.

LOL! ROFLMAO!  cancun?????  SEEK TREATMENT!  NOW!


You mean a script like that possibly bogus or not email supposedly from Deepak?  Now THERE was a script.  Only thing, his mother must not have gotten her copy.  She said Natalee did not speak one word to the boys, not one word and he said in that she said all kinds of ridiculous things.

So if they all say the same thing, it has to be a script instead of the truth?  All 140 of them?  I would thin some would tell if that happened.  A group that large could never keep any kind of secret.  That makes no sense for just like Deepak's mom, somebody would not get their copy or would not keep it straight.  But there are plenty of articles in newspapers quoting various kids.  What normal kid would spent their vacation monitoring Natalee, looking for aberant behavior, anyway?  Yes, girls talk but not when there is nothing to tell.  Joren was not in the same league as these kids and back home, would not have been anybody that I think NH would have wanted to even be seen with let alone have some torrid affair.

There is a good post previously on "carving out" which is the term the locals use in that region for separating a vulnerable female from her group by just sort of jostling her away from them into a car while in a crowd.  

But I don't see what your child-rearing practices have to do with any of this and do not follow your line of thought at all.  Who is blaming a country for something that can't be fixed?  Nothing is going to bring her back but should not others be given the warning?  18 is still considered a minor in this country, thus kids, they cannot vote or drink legally here at that age.  We even have many counties in this state that are called dry because alcohol is not sold but you can have it in your home, just have to buy it elsewhere but what does that have to do with anything?  These KIDS are as well reared as any anywhere.  Are you implyin that her disappearance has to do with her upbringing?  I surely hope not.


No. I mean little MB puppets, speaking about what they were told would be Ok. Sorry and spare me: Jug indicated that his own kids had gone to Aruba 3 yrs. ago and C&C was wild then. So, why were the "kids" from MB at C&C every night despite the fact that they had all inclusive at the HI"and "knew hoow bad C&C was?


While the main motive may have been the scene and the dancing, maybe they also went to C & C to sober up since they would be tempted to drink for free at HI and at C&C they could pace themselves since they had to pay for booze other than the free samples and the contest winnings.  We know they went over there at least twice from first hand press reports.   And it appears there may have been scuffles with Joran both times.


Title: Re: TX EquuSearch Update
Post by: absolut on June 26, 2005, 09:03:23 AM
Quote from: "Itawamba"
TX EquuSearch Update


Sorry, all--took me so much time to read and try to catch up that I forgot to post a very small update on TX EquuSearch.

While it's true that the winds on Aruba were quite strong today and they did affect the dogs' work earlier in the day and afternoon, Tim Miller said tonight that they were able to get back to work in the later afternoon and make some progress.  Video showed the dogs working near a hotel.

They have been in the water with the side-scan sonar in at least a couple of places already searched and one that hadn't been (this was as of this evening, sometime before the 10PM CDT newscast).  Eight divers were all assisting during the day and evening.  (Probably still are, as I write this.)

Tim commented on the amount of detritus to sift through being exceptionally voluminous, but not a problem they haven't encountered before.  I assume this is because of tourist areas and so many people coming and going--wrappers, cans, bottles, clothing items.  It's very difficult under these circumstances to know what might be evidence.

It was also mentioned (can't recall if Tim said it or if I read it in an earlier update this afternoon) that Arubans may be called upon to help some of the ground-pounders in coming days.

Of course, anything of significance found will be turned over to authorities--I don't know if they will *announce* anything at this time.  He did say the water searches of today had not turned up anything useful.

I was also surprised to learn there is a total of 24 team members (rather than 17) on the ground in Aruba--and 4 SAR dogs.  Our local news said that three additional dogs had gone down today.  (I thought they were "behind" and just reporting the last dog team, but I had this confirmed, and there are 4--only 1 dog went Friday.)

I might be forgetting one other aspect of today's searches, but I can't think of what it is!

~~~~~~~~
I'm editing to change the number of dogs to 4 from 6--only 1 dog went on Friday, then 3 on Sat.  My original info was that 3 dogs went on Fri and 3 on Sat.


Great post. We may need to add this to a summary somewhere.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Dallas Also on June 26, 2005, 09:04:37 AM
absolut, check your PMs.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: pinemeadows on June 26, 2005, 09:12:21 AM
Quote from: "gagirl"
Does anyone else think it strange that they are saying that PVDS was basically unemployed? Was this one reason his business computer was confiscated? Sorry... waking up and having my coffee.


This was taken from a post on Dan's site:  

"Some biographical information about PVDS from a Dutch newspaper internetsite (www.ad.nl, "Van magistraat tot verdachte van moord"):
- he was born in The Netherlands, lived there from his birth in 1952 to 1993;
- he became a lawyer; he was known as a hardliner, a person also that never gives up;
- in 1993 he went with his family (wife and two sons Joran and Valentijn) to Aruba and worked there as a juridical employee for the State; on Aruba a third son is born: Sebastiaan;
- later (when?) he became assistent of the General Prosecutioner on Aruba;
- in 2003 (or 2002?) he started a training for judge, still on Aruba; from March 2004 to March 2005 he followed the judgetraining in The Netherlands; but he failed; back on Aruba in March 2005 he doesn't continue his training."

The fact that he failed was confirmed recently with someone from their Justice Department.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Professor on June 26, 2005, 09:12:44 AM
Quote from: "Getagrip"
Quote from: "TTownMike"
If anyone thinks Jug is outta line, FERGITTABOUTIT!

LMAO! Gotta love Mike  :lol:

Totally agree with you. Although Natalee may not be his own flesh and blood daughter, Jug sees the pain and torture his wife is going through and is acting as her protector.


And, for everyone who says that boy ain't camera ready, or who opine that he ain't all that likeable, just kidnap my daugher and see how much you like ME.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: sandraK on June 26, 2005, 09:14:34 AM
Paul is a Lawyer and a Law Prof.@ The School.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: scared-tom on June 26, 2005, 09:16:18 AM
Quote from: "pinemeadows"
Quote from: "gagirl"
Does anyone else think it strange that they are saying that PVDS was basically unemployed? Was this one reason his business computer was confiscated? Sorry... waking up and having my coffee.


This was taken from a post on Dan's site:  

"Some biographical information about PVDS from a Dutch newspaper internetsite (www.ad.nl, "Van magistraat tot verdachte van moord"):
- he was born in The Netherlands, lived there from his birth in 1952 to 1993;
- he became a lawyer; he was known as a hardliner, a person also that never gives up;
- in 1993 he went with his family (wife and two sons Joran and Valentijn) to Aruba and worked there as a juridical employee for the State; on Aruba a third son is born: Sebastiaan;
- later (when?) he became assistent of the General Prosecutioner on Aruba;
- in 2003 (or 2002?) he started a training for judge, still on Aruba; from March 2004 to March 2005 he followed the judgetraining in The Netherlands; but he failed; back on Aruba in March 2005 he doesn't continue his training."

The fact that he failed was confirmed recently with someone from their Justice Department.


Did this information come from the Riehl World weblog, or his comments. There is a big difference in terms of quality and accuracy.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: pinemeadows on June 26, 2005, 09:17:33 AM
I just don't get this...I can see why Joran isn't talking...out of fear, perhaps, or a loyalty to his dad (who told him not to talk).  

But what I don't get is why none of the others are talking!!!  I would think they'd be more afraid of LE than PVDS....or is there something more sinister that they're afraid of??


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: momto5 on June 26, 2005, 09:18:41 AM
Quote from: "Professor"
Quote from: "Getagrip"
Quote from: "TTownMike"
If anyone thinks Jug is outta line, FERGITTABOUTIT!

LMAO! Gotta love Mike  :lol:

Totally agree with you. Although Natalee may not be his own flesh and blood daughter, Jug sees the pain and torture his wife is going through and is acting as her protector.


And, for everyone who says that boy ain't camera ready, or who opine that he ain't all that likeable, just kidnap my daugher and see how much you like ME.

When your child is missing you dont care who likes you. Its all about getting your child back. I seriously dont know what people expect from thw Twittys. Do they expect them to hand the VDSs a bucket of roses? Their daughter is missing, their goal is getting her back, not about making friends.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: absolut on June 26, 2005, 09:19:07 AM
Quote from: "Scared-Tom"
Quote from: "pinemeadows"
Quote from: "gagirl"
Does anyone else think it strange that they are saying that PVDS was basically unemployed? Was this one reason his business computer was confiscated? Sorry... waking up and having my coffee.


This was taken from a post on Dan's site:  

"Some biographical information about PVDS from a Dutch newspaper internetsite (www.ad.nl, "Van magistraat tot verdachte van moord"):
- he was born in The Netherlands, lived there from his birth in 1952 to 1993;
- he became a lawyer; he was known as a hardliner, a person also that never gives up;
- in 1993 he went with his family (wife and two sons Joran and Valentijn) to Aruba and worked there as a juridical employee for the State; on Aruba a third son is born: Sebastiaan;
- later (when?) he became assistent of the General Prosecutioner on Aruba;
- in 2003 (or 2002?) he started a training for judge, still on Aruba; from March 2004 to March 2005 he followed the judgetraining in The Netherlands; but he failed; back on Aruba in March 2005 he doesn't continue his training."

The fact that he failed was confirmed recently with someone from their Justice Department.


Did this information come from the Riehl World weblog, or his comments. There is a big difference in terms of quality and accuracy.


It is from a post, but some of our members have the same info from other sources that they put up yesterday. I think Croes (justice minister) even had VDS in for like an interview. Not sure if that part is confirmed.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Herkimer on June 26, 2005, 09:19:15 AM
Quote from: "pinemeadows"
I just don't get this...I can see why Joran isn't talking...out of fear, perhaps, or a loyalty to his dad (who told him not to talk).  

But what I don't get is why none of the others are talking!!!  I would think they'd be more afraid of LE than PVDS....or is there something more sinister that they're afraid of??


Lorenzo: Don' look at me when you say dat!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: momto5 on June 26, 2005, 09:19:57 AM
Quote from: "pinemeadows"
I just don't get this...I can see why Joran isn't talking...out of fear, perhaps, or a loyalty to his dad (who told him not to talk).  

But what I don't get is why none of the others are talking!!!  I would think they'd be more afraid of LE than PVDS....or is there something more sinister that they're afraid of??

There would be one of two reasons they arent talking IMO.
1. They dont know anymore then they are telling
2. They were directly involved in what happened.
again JMO


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Curiosity on June 26, 2005, 09:20:13 AM
Quote from: "pinemeadows"
I just don't get this...I can see why Joran isn't talking...out of fear, perhaps, or a loyalty to his dad (who told him not to talk).  

But what I don't get is why none of the others are talking!!!  I would think they'd be more afraid of LE than PVDS....or is there something more sinister that they're afraid of??


Could be the brothers are telling the truth about dropping Joran off and being out of the situation thereafter. It will be interesting to see if either of the brothers get out of jail today. That will tell us a bit more about how much evidence they have on the brothers.....stay in jail and I will take it that they have evidence of some sort.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: pinemeadows on June 26, 2005, 09:22:09 AM
Quote from: "Scared-Tom"

Did this information come from the Riehl World weblog, or his comments. There is a big difference in terms of quality and accuracy.


Tom, I stated it was from a post on his site.  Guess I should have said a poster, not a post!  Sorry.

As far as accuracy, I don't know Dutch, but one could go to the website that the poster referenced.

"Some biographical information about PVDS from a Dutch newspaper internetsite [b](www.ad.nl, "Van magistraat tot verdachte van moord"):[/b]
- he was born in The Netherlands,.....etc etc etc


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Curiosity on June 26, 2005, 09:23:17 AM
It was brought up a few pages back about the $25,000 raised. I don't know what the money will be used for, but I do know that the CNN video has the Texas team saying they will stay in Aruba as long as the money is there to pay for it. They have $25,000, but thought it they might need as much as $100,000. I hope there are some people willing to donate to this cause, since I think they have a better chance of coming up with something than the police searches did. JMHO


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: no x it on June 26, 2005, 09:26:00 AM
Quote from: "GeOrGiA"
I know the topic of lie detectors has been discussed here before - I'll be the first to admit I haven't read every thread.  My question to anyone would be if the boys ARE finally telling the truth (i.e. the brothers dropped Joran and Natalee off at the beach, Joran says they were at the beach and he left her there) - why wouldn't they WANT to take a lie detector test to affirm that?  I know they're not admissible, but they are certainly used.  Is there some legal reason behind it not being requested by the boys and their family?

Plenty from the boy's side. If innocent and you fail b/c you are nervous or have any number of normal psychological reactions to the situation, you are now a suspect.  If you are innocent and pass, they say you are a criminal sociopath and can fool the test and are guilty.  It's like a modern age witch-dunking with wires and guages.  Scientific proof of high sensitivity and specificity is non-existent.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: sandy on June 26, 2005, 09:27:11 AM
Quote from: "momto5"
Quote from: "pinemeadows"
I just don't get this...I can see why Joran isn't talking...out of fear, perhaps, or a loyalty to his dad (who told him not to talk).  

But what I don't get is why none of the others are talking!!!  I would think they'd be more afraid of LE than PVDS....or is there something more sinister that they're afraid of??

There would be one of two reasons they arent talking IMO.
1. They dont know anymore then they are telling
2. They were directly involved in what happened.
again JMO


If they took PVDS in to pressure JVDS then they can keep any of the others for reasons other than out and out complicity


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: DallasGirl on June 26, 2005, 09:29:57 AM
http://ap.tbo.com/ap/breaking/MGBZY142AAE.html

A friend of Holloway said van der Sloot - a 6-foot-5-inch, (1.8-meter, 13- centimeter) broad-shouldered athlete - got into a scuffle outside the restaurant with some of the Alabama visitors the second night of their five-day trip.
"I broke it up," said Bryan Reynolds, 18.
Reynolds didn't elaborate.

http://www.legendgames.net/showstory.asp?page=blognews/stories/WN0000203.txt

One of the three young men arrested Thursday in the disappearance of Mountain Brook teen Natalee Holloway got into a pushing match with some of her friends in an Aruban bar, one of Holloway's friends said Thursday.

Bryan Reynolds, 18, one of 124 recent high school graduates whowent to Aruba in late May, said some of his friends almost got into a fight with Joran Andreas Petrus Van Der Sloot and his friends.

The scuffle started after Van Der Sloot, a Dutch suspect arrested at his upper-class home in Oranjestad, Aruba, Thursday morning, had been talking to 18-year-old Holloway at a bar where she and classmates hung out during the five-day trip, Reynolds said.


More conflicting stories. The first one says the scuffle took place the second night of the trip.  If NH did not meet JVDS until the last night of trip it would seem the scuffle had nothing to do with NH.  The second story doesn't give a time frame for the scuffle but does say it was about NH.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: azvet on June 26, 2005, 09:30:05 AM
Does anybody know if they are in court yet today? It was supposed to begin about an hour ago. All they are showing on Fox is the picture of the front of the courthouse, but no live pictures of people being brought in.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: pinemeadows on June 26, 2005, 09:31:32 AM
Quote from: "azvet"
Does anybody know if they are in court yet today? It was supposed to begin about an hour ago. All they are showing on Fox is the picture of the front of the courthouse, but no live pictures of people being brought in.


I wonder if they could be doing this in an undisclosed location because of the media.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Kshe78 on June 26, 2005, 09:31:49 AM
They said they thought three of the suspects went in a back door.  What's up with that camera?  It's not a "real camera" so it would be hard to see anything anyway.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: momto5 on June 26, 2005, 09:32:00 AM
Quote from: "azvet"
Does anybody know if they are in court yet today? It was supposed to begin about an hour ago. All they are showing on Fox is the picture of the front of the courthouse, but no live pictures of people being brought in.

I dont know but if you guys can keep me updated Id appreciate it. My husband took over my Tv to play PS2 and my kids have cartoons on the other one. Thanks!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: absolut on June 26, 2005, 09:32:02 AM
Quote from: "azvet"
Does anybody know if they are in court yet today? It was supposed to begin about an hour ago. All they are showing on Fox is the picture of the front of the courthouse, but no live pictures of people being brought in.


Looks like they are getting a slow start.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Kshe78 on June 26, 2005, 09:32:38 AM
Update - 4 of the 5 are in the courhouse.

Steve C. is not inside yet.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: sandy on June 26, 2005, 09:35:01 AM
Has anyone heard what kind of contact Dad and Son have had since Dad was taken in - or is Dad still at the police station and Joran at KIA


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: pinemeadows on June 26, 2005, 09:36:39 AM
What kind of information does the new judge now have on this case?  Did he get time to review documents and evidence before beginning this morning, or is he going in "cold" and talking only to the suspects?

Trying to understand how this works, in the literal sense.  

Do the lawyers attend this?  Do they get to defend the rights of their clients at this type of hearing, or is it strictly that the judge reviews everything.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: absolut on June 26, 2005, 09:36:41 AM
What is it with Fox and the Monkey stories? :)


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: rkymtncjngrl on June 26, 2005, 09:38:13 AM
Quote from: "sandy"
Has anyone heard what kind of contact Dad and Son have had since Dad was taken in - or is Dad still at the police station and Joran at KIA
 Is Joran aware Dad was taken in?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: azvet on June 26, 2005, 09:38:55 AM
I don't thinkthe lawyer get to attend, but not sure. I think each detainee gets interviewed by the judge for 2-3 hours, and each one is done separately.
Don't know why the change in judges, maybe an elevation to a higher level judge. Lets hope he's not as bad as Ito in the OJ event.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: pinemeadows on June 26, 2005, 09:39:29 AM
Quote from: "rkymtncjngrl"
Quote from: "sandy"
Has anyone heard what kind of contact Dad and Son have had since Dad was taken in - or is Dad still at the police station and Joran at KIA
 Is Joran aware Dad was taken in?


I am sure he knows!  This is one of the ways they will pressure Joran into giving more information, according to Rudy Croes.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Curiosity on June 26, 2005, 09:39:37 AM
Quote from: "rkymtncjngrl"
Quote from: "sandy"
Has anyone heard what kind of contact Dad and Son have had since Dad was taken in - or is Dad still at the police station and Joran at KIA
 Is Joran aware Dad was taken in?


If Joran doesn't know Dad was taken in, he sure will know once they are all in the courtroom.  :D


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: momto5 on June 26, 2005, 09:39:39 AM
Quote from: "pinemeadows"
What kind of information does the new judge now have on this case?  Did he get time to review documents and evidence before beginning this morning, or is he going in "cold" and talking only to the suspects?

Trying to understand how this works, in the literal sense.  

Do the lawyers attend this?  Do they get to defend the rights of their clients at this type of hearing, or is it strictly that the judge reviews everything.

I would like to know as well. I would also like to know are all of the suspects together in front of the judge, or are they handled individually? I assume they are questioned independantly by the judge, but I mean when he makes his decision is it with them all present, or one at a time? Just wondering...


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: sandy on June 26, 2005, 09:39:52 AM
Quote from: "rkymtncjngrl"
Quote from: "sandy"
Has anyone heard what kind of contact Dad and Son have had since Dad was taken in - or is Dad still at the police station and Joran at KIA
 Is Joran aware Dad was taken in?


Can't imagine he isn't aware when the officials have stated one of the reasons they took dad in was to put pressure on junior


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Cerulean on June 26, 2005, 09:40:42 AM
If I understand correctly, it's not unusual for court sessions in the United States to begin in late morning.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: KackyLacky on June 26, 2005, 09:41:37 AM
Quote from: "pinemeadows"
What kind of information does the new judge now have on this case?  Did he get time to review documents and evidence before beginning this morning, or is he going in "cold" and talking only to the suspects?

Trying to understand how this works, in the literal sense.  

Do the lawyers attend this?  Do they get to defend the rights of their clients at this type of hearing, or is it strictly that the judge reviews everything.



perhaps this is why he "missed" his flight----------reading pertinent documents, motions etc?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: pinemeadows on June 26, 2005, 09:41:45 AM
Quote from: "azvet"
Lets hope he's not as bad as Ito in the OJ event.


Yikes!  Is he still on the bench, by the way? :?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: momto5 on June 26, 2005, 09:41:45 AM
Quote from: "Cerulean"
It's not unusual for court sessions in the United States to begin in late morning.

It isnt unusual at all, Ive sat all day waiting in civil court  :roll:


Title: Justice Minister to Antilles
Post by: iquitos on June 26, 2005, 09:42:35 AM
Origineel persbericht.

Ivo Hommes
070 370 6126


4667
22.06.05


MAANDAG TRIPARTIETE OVERLEG NEDERLANDSE ANTILLEN/ARUBA
Dutch Justice Minister to Antilles


De ministers Donner (Justitie) en Pechtold (Bestuurlijke Vernieuwing en Koninkrijksrelaties) zullen a.s. maandag 27 juni het tripartiete overleg bijwonen op de Nederlandse Antillen. Dit overleg vindt regulier plaats tussen de ministers van Justitie binnen het Koninkrijk. Namens de Nederlandse Antillen zijn de heer D.A. Dick (Justitie) en namens Aruba de heer H.R. Croes (Justitie) aanwezig bij het overleg. Het overleg vindt plaats in Willemstad op Curaçao.

In het overleg zal gesproken worden over de voortgang van het rechtshandhavingsprogramma, de bestrijding van drugssmokkel, de aanpak van terrorisme en de voogdijregeling.
--------


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: gagirl on June 26, 2005, 09:42:47 AM
According to one of Greta's interviews in front of the court house.... the suspects are taken in one at a time before the judge and seated below the judge in a chair, the lawyer stands to the side of the defendant. The judge is above and on one side of the judge is the prosecutor.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: nancy_drew on June 26, 2005, 09:43:00 AM
Good morning...

It's a gorgeous morning in the mountains. I miss Razzy, she was such a nice asset to the forum. I like sassy...

Carol McKinley, the Fox reporter on in Aruba this morning is an old pal of mine...I'm going to email her and see what's up...

Last report on Fox said four of the five are in the courthouse. They are still waiting for Steve Croes to show up.

~Nancy


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: KackyLacky on June 26, 2005, 09:43:31 AM
Quote from: "sandy"
Quote from: "rkymtncjngrl"
Quote from: "sandy"
Has anyone heard what kind of contact Dad and Son have had since Dad was taken in - or is Dad still at the police station and Joran at KIA
 Is Joran aware Dad was taken in?


Can't imagine he isn't aware when the officials have stated one of the reasons they took dad in was to put pressure on junior


joran's mom said the other day in a video clip on TV that joran told her they may arrest his dad, and he was upset about it because they should show him (the dad) more respect. She is standing under some trees, I think it was either CNN or MSNBC but right after dad's arrest.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: iquitos on June 26, 2005, 09:44:26 AM
Old judge has moved to another job.  

Quote from: "azvet"
I don't thinkthe lawyer get to attend, but not sure. I think each detainee gets interviewed by the judge for 2-3 hours, and each one is done separately.
Don't know why the change in judges, maybe an elevation to a higher level judge. Lets hope he's not as bad as Ito in the OJ event.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: KackyLacky on June 26, 2005, 09:45:16 AM
Quote from: "iquitos"
Old judge has moved to another job.  

d
Quote from: "azvet"
I don't thinkthe lawyer get to attend, but not sure. I think each detainee gets interviewed by the judge for 2-3 hours, and each one is done separately.
Don't know why the change in judges, maybe an elevation to a higher level judge. Lets hope he's not as bad as Ito in the OJ event.


perhaps a recusal?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: mehill10 on June 26, 2005, 09:45:23 AM
Quote from: "DallasGirl"
http://ap.tbo.com/ap/breaking/MGBZY142AAE.html

A friend of Holloway said van der Sloot - a 6-foot-5-inch, (1.8-meter, 13- centimeter) broad-shouldered athlete - got into a scuffle outside the restaurant with some of the Alabama visitors the second night of their five-day trip.
"I broke it up," said Bryan Reynolds, 18.
Reynolds didn't elaborate.

http://www.legendgames.net/showstory.asp?page=blognews/stories/WN0000203.txt

One of the three young men arrested Thursday in the disappearance of Mountain Brook teen Natalee Holloway got into a pushing match with some of her friends in an Aruban bar, one of Holloway's friends said Thursday.

Bryan Reynolds, 18, one of 124 recent high school graduates whowent to Aruba in late May, said some of his friends almost got into a fight with Joran Andreas Petrus Van Der Sloot and his friends.

The scuffle started after Van Der Sloot, a Dutch suspect arrested at his upper-class home in Oranjestad, Aruba, Thursday morning, had been talking to 18-year-old Holloway at a bar where she and classmates hung out during the five-day trip, Reynolds said.


More conflicting stories. The first one says the scuffle took place the second night of the trip.  If NH did not meet JVDS until the last night of trip it would seem the scuffle had nothing to do with NH.  The second story doesn't give a time frame for the scuffle but does say it was about NH.

it was a pushing match inside the bar no one has said what it was about  it happen in c&c  before they left the bar


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Curiosity on June 26, 2005, 09:45:30 AM
So which is it....one at a time in the courtroom or per the FOX report that four are currently in the courtroom?? I'm confused about the procedures already.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: azvet on June 26, 2005, 09:46:42 AM
Quote from: "pinemeadows"
Quote from: "azvet"
Lets hope he's not as bad as Ito in the OJ event.


Yikes!  Is he still on the bench, by the way? :?


Dunno !  If he's like the rest of them on either side of the case, he's either written a book or become a TV "expert" analyst of some flavor. Probably playing golf with OJ in Miami.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Boston Lyn on June 26, 2005, 09:46:49 AM
Last night on Fox, Joran's lawyer said that Joran did know his father was arrested and that he wasn't surprised by the arrest.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: sandy on June 26, 2005, 09:47:22 AM
Nancy - I know this is off topic but given this occurred in your back yard if I am correct - what is your take on the Jon Benet Ramsay case?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 26, 2005, 09:47:23 AM
Quote from: "Curiosity"
So which is it....one at a time in the courtroom or per the FOX report that four are currently in the courtroom?? I'm confused about the procedures already.


4 are at the courthouse already..each will be talked to individually


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: pinemeadows on June 26, 2005, 09:47:27 AM
Quote from: "KackyLacky"
joran's mom said the other day in a video clip on TV that joran told her they may arrest his dad, and he was upset about it because they should show him (the dad) more respect.


Outrageous.  I can't believe AVDS could even verbalize this.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: absolut on June 26, 2005, 09:48:24 AM
Quote from: "sandy"
Nancy - I know this is off topic but given this occurred in your back yard if I am correct - what is your take on the Jon Benet Ramsay case?


If you wish to discuss another case please start a new thread in News issues.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: momto5 on June 26, 2005, 09:48:48 AM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "Curiosity"
So which is it....one at a time in the courtroom or per the FOX report that four are currently in the courtroom?? I'm confused about the procedures already.


4 are at the courthouse already..each will be talked to individually

ty for clearing that up  :D


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Curiosity on June 26, 2005, 09:49:12 AM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "Curiosity"
So which is it....one at a time in the courtroom or per the FOX report that four are currently in the courtroom?? I'm confused about the procedures already.


4 are at the courthouse already..each will be talked to individually


Thank you Angiewx911dspatchr....it's appreciated.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 26, 2005, 09:49:37 AM
Quote from: "momto5"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "Curiosity"
So which is it....one at a time in the courtroom or per the FOX report that four are currently in the courtroom?? I'm confused about the procedures already.


4 are at the courthouse already..each will be talked to individually

ty for clearing that up  :D


No problem!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: sandy on June 26, 2005, 09:49:59 AM
Quote from: "absolut"
Quote from: "sandy"
Nancy - I know this is off topic but given this occurred in your back yard if I am correct - what is your take on the Jon Benet Ramsay case?


If you wish to discuss another case please start a new thread in News issues.


My appologies - was looking for a one line summary - not a full blown discussion - time to do the dishes


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: iquitos on June 26, 2005, 09:50:36 AM
Quote from: "pinemeadows"
Quote from: "Scared-Tom"

Did this information come from the Riehl World weblog, or his comments. There is a big difference in terms of quality and accuracy.


Tom, I stated it was from a post on his site.  Guess I should have said a poster, not a post!  Sorry.

As far as accuracy, I don't know Dutch, but one could go to the website that the poster referenced.

"Some biographical information about PVDS from a Dutch newspaper internetsite [b](www.ad.nl, "Van magistraat tot verdachte van moord"):[/b]
- he was born in The Netherlands,.....etc etc etc


that headline translates:  from magistrate to murder suspect.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 26, 2005, 09:50:50 AM
Quote from: "Curiosity"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "Curiosity"
So which is it....one at a time in the courtroom or per the FOX report that four are currently in the courtroom?? I'm confused about the procedures already.


4 are at the courthouse already..each will be talked to individually


Thank you Angiewx911dspatchr....it's appreciated.


You're welcome... I guess Steve Croes is the only one that hasnt arrived yet  as per FOX... and the others went in a back door.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Cerulean on June 26, 2005, 09:50:58 AM
Someone wrote that the Judge "missed" his flight on Saturday.  My understanding is that the flight was delayed several times as they tried to fix a mechanical problem.  Finally it was too late in the day to hold the trial. Judges do not just flake out on court attendance.  Some of them even do stuff like bring in their own contacts to act as interpreters when the court system can't find one for traffic court (where I live).  There are a lot of things wrong with judges and with the legal system in the US and elsewhere but showing up and basic stuff is usually not one of the problems.

All of the legal personnel in this case are probably giving up all their time, weekends, nights, family life, time with kids.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: nancy_drew on June 26, 2005, 09:51:30 AM
Quote from: "sandy"
Nancy - I know this is off topic but given this occurred in your back yard if I am correct - what is your take on the Jon Benet Ramsay case?


I was very involved in the case.  I'm happy to PM or email about it, but won't take up space here.  One thing I will say...

It was one of the MOST BOTCHED cases in the US....egos not letting outside help come in to assist. Very bad combination.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: nancy_drew on June 26, 2005, 09:54:16 AM
Kacky...

You're looking FABULOUS this morning, Dahlink....

That is the BEST avitar...

LOL

I'm gonna put up a new Nancy Drew soon...I didn't want to take up bandwidth.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: iquitos on June 26, 2005, 09:56:04 AM
Quote from: "KackyLacky"
Quote from: "iquitos"
Old judge has moved to another job.  

d
Quote from: "azvet"
I don't thinkthe lawyer get to attend, but not sure. I think each detainee gets interviewed by the judge for 2-3 hours, and each one is done separately.
Don't know why the change in judges, maybe an elevation to a higher level judge. Lets hope he's not as bad as Ito in the OJ event.


perhaps a recusal?
 

No, he was appointed to the Carribean Court.    I think they are short of judges out there.  Could they move the case to Holland?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: arrabba on June 26, 2005, 09:56:58 AM
Quote from: "azvet"
I don't thinkthe lawyer get to attend, but not sure. I think each detainee gets interviewed by the judge for 2-3 hours, and each one is done separately.
Don't know why the change in judges, maybe an elevation to a higher level judge. Lets hope he's not as bad as Ito in the OJ event.


It was reported that the judge was changed to maintain impartiality.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: mehill10 on June 26, 2005, 09:58:08 AM
Quote from: "iquitos"
Quote from: "KackyLacky"
Quote from: "iquitos"
Old judge has moved to another job.  

d
Quote from: "azvet"
I don't thinkthe lawyer get to attend, but not sure. I think each detainee gets interviewed by the judge for 2-3 hours, and each one is done separately.
Don't know why the change in judges, maybe an elevation to a higher level judge. Lets hope he's not as bad as Ito in the OJ event.


perhaps a recusal?
 No, he was appointed to the Carribean Court.    I think they ae short of judges out there.  Could they move the case to Holland?



i have beenhaving  hard time figureing out just what a defence lawyer does in Aruba


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: absolut on June 26, 2005, 09:59:15 AM
Quote from: "mehill10"
Quote from: "iquitos"
Quote from: "KackyLacky"
Quote from: "iquitos"
Old judge has moved to another job.  

d
Quote from: "azvet"
I don't thinkthe lawyer get to attend, but not sure. I think each detainee gets interviewed by the judge for 2-3 hours, and each one is done separately.
Don't know why the change in judges, maybe an elevation to a higher level judge. Lets hope he's not as bad as Ito in the OJ event.


perhaps a recusal?
 No, he was appointed to the Carribean Court.    I think they ae short of judges out there.  Could they move the case to Holland?


i have beenhaving  hard time figureing out just what a defence lawyer does in Aruba
Talks to the press and says nothing.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: LemonDrop on June 26, 2005, 10:01:45 AM
Good morning fellow monkeys!

All I want to say is, if anyone stole/kidnapped/murdered/raped/harmed my daughter, vengeance would be mine!   :twisted:  Having said that, I do NOT want the wrong people arrested.  Vengeance meaning action thru the legal system...not thru my own hands.  AND...I wouldn't want someone arrested just for the sake of "arresting someone".  

However I do think those in custody have something to do with Natalee's disappearance.

I am impressed with Beth Holloway's actions.  In fact, I'm in awe.... I'm a wuss when it comes to the thought of some bodily harm coming to either of my kids!

Carry on. I'm still on coffee....


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: LemonDrop on June 26, 2005, 10:02:41 AM
Quote from: "mehill10"
i have beenhaving  hard time figureing out just what a defence lawyer does in Aruba


Amen.  Perhaps arubagirl could explain?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Curiosity on June 26, 2005, 10:11:45 AM
I'm impatient....this waiting is getting insane....I even thought we were going to be bored to death with a report on mango juice (FOX). Glad it was only an ad.......

Anyone want to bet who gets what amount of time in jail??

Easy bet....Joren stays another round!

Not sure about the brothers or dad??


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: nancy_drew on June 26, 2005, 10:12:05 AM
Quote from: "LemonDrop"
Quote from: "mehill10"
i have beenhaving  hard time figureing out just what a defence lawyer does in Aruba


Amen.  Perhaps arubagirl could explain?


I agree.  However, I thought they are allowed to visit with their clients.  What concerns me is having a lawyer for a father leads me to believe Joran is going to keep his mouth shut, no matter what.  I'm sure Dad said "Don't talk, you don't have to"  

Original reports suggest Joran was shocked that he father was arrested.


Title: Timeline question
Post by: Orangecrush on June 26, 2005, 10:12:33 AM
Could someone enlighten me a the timelime between when the Kalpoe brothers drop NH and JVDS off and the time Joran text messaged his friend.  

Curious.  May not take a lot of time to murder someone, but to hatch a plan and dispose of a body would seem to me to take more than an hour.  Unless of course he was experienced at doing this and knew the drill.  

Thanks, orangecrush


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: KackyLacky on June 26, 2005, 10:12:58 AM
Quote from: "nancy_drew"
Kacky...

You're looking FABULOUS this morning, Dahlink....

That is the BEST avitar...

LOL

I'm gonna put up a new Nancy Drew soon...I didn't want to take up bandwidth.


ain't plastic surgery maaaaarrrrvelous!   kiss kiss!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: iquitos on June 26, 2005, 10:13:37 AM
Quote from: "LemonDrop"
Quote from: "mehill10"
i have beenhaving  hard time figuring out just what a defence lawyer does in Aruba


Amen.  Perhaps arubagirl could explain?


In the investigative phase, before actual charges are lodged, i don't think they have much to do except monitor and enter procedural motions.  I beleieve they will be present today and can provide advice to clients.  my impression is they get busy when charges are actually brought, at which time they can bring up all the mistakes made in this phase.  

about the search and wind.  wind is constant.  see those trees that are permanently bent in one direction?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: momto5 on June 26, 2005, 10:15:40 AM
Quote from: "Curiosity"
I'm impatient....this waiting is getting insane....I even thought we were going to be bored to death with a report on mango juice (FOX). Glad it was only an ad.......

Anyone want to bet who gets what amount of time in jail??

Easy bet....Joren stays another round!

Not sure about the brothers or dad??

I think they all remain detained. Possibly they decide to change the status on one or two to material witness rather then suspects. if anyone does get out Im betting on Steve C and/or Satish. Deepok, Joran and dad all stay in. Thats my guess.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 26, 2005, 10:15:52 AM
Quote from: "KackyLacky"
Quote from: "nancy_drew"
Kacky...

You're looking FABULOUS this morning, Dahlink....

That is the BEST avitar...

LOL

I'm gonna put up a new Nancy Drew soon...I didn't want to take up bandwidth.


ain't plastic surgery maaaaarrrrvelous!   kiss kiss!


LMAO.. thats for the laugh!!  :lol:


Title: Re: Timeline question
Post by: iquitos on June 26, 2005, 10:16:19 AM
Quote from: "Orangecrush"
Could someone enlighten me a the timelime between when the Kalpoe brothers drop NH and JVDS off and the time Joran text messaged his friend.  

Curious.  May not take a lot of time to murder someone, but to hatch a plan and dispose of a body would seem to me to take more than an hour.  Unless of course he was experienced at doing this and knew the drill.  

Thanks, orangecrush
 

see timeline in topics.  you are right there is very little time for rank amateurs to dispose of a body so it won't be dug up or float starting from scratch with no tools in pitch darkness and trying to beat daylight at 6 am.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: pinemeadows on June 26, 2005, 10:16:26 AM
Quote from: "iquitos"

about the search and wind.  wind is constant.  see those trees that are permanently bent in one direction?


Sounds exactly like Wyoming....oops, Aruba has trees.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: la_cavaličre on June 26, 2005, 10:18:10 AM
So if one of them is released, do you think they'll talk to the press?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: pinemeadows on June 26, 2005, 10:19:18 AM
Quote from: "la_cavaličre"
So if one of them is released, do you think they'll talk to the press?


CAN they talk to the press?  It's my understanding that just because you're released doesn't mean you won't be brought right back in the next day, or week, or month...


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 26, 2005, 10:20:58 AM
Quote from: "la_cavaličre"
So if one of them is released, do you think they'll talk to the press?


Good question... IMO  I doubt they will talk to press..may be advised not to.. and who knows.. they could always be brought back in later?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: momto5 on June 26, 2005, 10:21:14 AM
Quote from: "la_cavaličre"
So if one of them is released, do you think they'll talk to the press?

I think thats why everyone will be detained even if they are just witnesses at this point. After the security guard spoke with the press I dont think they want these guys to. My understanding someone on the news said you can be held as a material witness in aruba and remain in custody. Given the media attention I bet no one goes home today.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: klaasend on June 26, 2005, 10:23:12 AM
Quote from: "pinemeadows"
Quote from: "la_cavaličre"
So if one of them is released, do you think they'll talk to the press?


CAN they talk to the press?  It's my understanding that just because you're released doesn't mean you won't be brought right back in the next day, or week, or month...

The security guards spoke.  If they release Steve Croes it's possible he'll talk...but I doubt if either of the Kalpoe brothers will, especially if one is still in jail.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: sarah on June 26, 2005, 10:23:20 AM
I am really surprised that Anita VDS is talking to the press like she is.  Don't get me wrong, I am glad, but I wonder if her son or husband's lawyers are happy about her comments.


Title: For Those Critical of Jug's request that anita be questioned
Post by: Louise on June 26, 2005, 10:26:31 AM
While Anita cannot reveal what her son/husband said to her, she may have invaluable information such has:

Was laundary done and has son/husband ever done laundary. If they have never touched a washing machine and suddenly Joran washed his clothes he wore that night, would that be significant?

Were things missing from the house. For example did she have a ball of rope in her laundary room for the last 7 years and was it suddenly gone.

Was Joran in possession of an ATM card?

WAs her garden observed to be freshly dug, a new bed for instance that wasn't there before she left for Holland.

Was the car washed and squeaky clean? Did husband or son ever was the car.?

If my husband ever washes his car and gets it cleaned I will know he murdered someone.

What I am saying is that this woman is in a position to have noticed unusual things.

As to the criticism of Jar and his attitude, some her identify more wtih anyone else in the world than an angry white well to do man. And I say my attitude would be a damn sight worse.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: nancy_drew on June 26, 2005, 10:27:52 AM
Quote from: "azvet"
I don't thinkthe lawyer get to attend, but not sure. I think each detainee gets interviewed by the judge for 2-3 hours, and each one is done separately.
Don't know why the change in judges, maybe an elevation to a higher level judge. Lets hope he's not as bad as Ito in the OJ event.


The lawyers are there and are allowed to attend. I'm not sure what the guidelines are for questioning. Maybe someone else does.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: gagirl on June 26, 2005, 10:28:41 AM
According to CNN's website:
Quote
Police Commissioner Jan Van Der Straten on Friday refused to say if Paul Van Der Sloot was being cooperative. His wife, Anita, dropped some towels and other items off at the jail Saturday, but was not allowed to see her husband


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Curiosity on June 26, 2005, 10:29:16 AM
So, will we know anything if one is released or returned to jail before the others.....or do we have to wait until all five are processed to get any answers??


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: KackyLacky on June 26, 2005, 10:30:42 AM
I was just watching an attorney on MSNBC talking with a backdrop at Palm Beach, Aruba.  OMG it was BEAUTIFUL! the water looked marvelous.


Title: Re: Timeline question
Post by: arrabba on June 26, 2005, 10:31:29 AM
Quote from: "Orangecrush"
Could someone enlighten me a the timelime between when the Kalpoe brothers drop NH and JVDS off and the time Joran text messaged his friend.  

Curious.  May not take a lot of time to murder someone, but to hatch a plan and dispose of a body would seem to me to take more than an hour.  Unless of course he was experienced at doing this and knew the drill.  

Thanks, orangecrush


Seems to me a judge may have heard of any number of ways to dispose of a body, from all the criminal cases they have presided over.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: sarah on June 26, 2005, 10:32:02 AM
Wasn't Anita gone to Holland for about a week?  I could be wrong about this.  If I knew that my son was the last person seen with a missing person, I would be on the phone to my spouse who was out of town to tell them all about it.  They would also have their tail back to town asap.  Wonder if PVDS contacted his wife about what was going on or if he sprung it on her when she got back from her trip.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Red on June 26, 2005, 10:33:02 AM
Quote from: "absolut"
Do clocks in Aruba mean anything?

It is almost 9am, the hearing was supposed to start at 8:30.


hahaha ... Its 10.30 and still nothing. Obviously you may not be familair with this island term, "no problem".  :D

A do  believe the term "deadline" is also not in the vocabulary.

No offense Aruba, maybe a good thing ... less ulcers.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Rosalie on June 26, 2005, 10:33:17 AM
Quote from: "nancy_drew"
Quote from: "LemonDrop"
Quote from: "mehill10"
i have beenhaving  hard time figureing out just what a defence lawyer does in Aruba


Amen.  Perhaps arubagirl could explain?


I agree.  However, I thought they are allowed to visit with their clients.  What concerns me is having a lawyer for a father leads me to believe Joran is going to keep his mouth shut, no matter what.  I'm sure Dad said "Don't talk, you don't have to"  

Original reports suggest Joran was shocked that he father was arrested.



   Dont say a word, you dont have to.  Correct, all the while you are held before trial you are not required by law to say a word.    In court you ARE required to answer. I think I read that somewhere.
So, that means to me that , so far, they dont have that much on him/them.
They need a confession.
I cant believe how those young kids have held up this long. I would have said I was Jack the Ripper by now just to get them off my back.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Curiosity on June 26, 2005, 10:36:49 AM
Quote
I would have said I was Jack the Ripper by now just to get them off my back.
:lol:  :)  :D :lol:


Title: Re: For Those Critical of Jug's request that anita be questi
Post by: nikkibnurse on June 26, 2005, 10:38:04 AM
Quote from: "Louise"
While Anita cannot reveal what her son/husband said to her, she may have invaluable information such has:

Was laundary done and has son/husband ever done laundary. If they have never touched a washing machine and suddenly Joran washed his clothes he wore that night, would that be significant?

Were things missing from the house. For example did she have a ball of rope in her laundary room for the last 7 years and was it suddenly gone.

Was Joran in possession of an ATM card?

WAs her garden observed to be freshly dug, a new bed for instance that wasn't there before she left for Holland.

Was the car washed and squeaky clean? Did husband or son ever was the car.?

If my husband ever washes his car and gets it cleaned I will know he murdered someone.

What I am saying is that this woman is in a position to have noticed unusual things.

As to the criticism of Jar and his attitude, some her identify more wtih anyone else in the world than an angry white well to do man. And I say my attitude would be a damn sight worse.



Very good questions, Louise, and i agree with you....hell hath NO fury if this were my child!!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: sarah on June 26, 2005, 10:38:11 AM
Apparently their interogating techniques are not working.  A couple of minutes in a room with Jug might work.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Red on June 26, 2005, 10:39:18 AM
Quote from: "absolut"
What is it with Fox and the Monkey stories? :)


I was waiting for the opportune moment to use this. Ever wonder why Greta claims to own the story ...

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,160602,00.html

By Greta Van Susteren
Do we have a simian source on Aruba?

The Monkey is everywhere.  :D

Forgive me but after last nights late night and a definite lack of coffee this AM, could not resist. A little levity has to break in every so often.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: arrabba on June 26, 2005, 10:41:23 AM
Did anyone see the reporter on FOX earlier saying that there is no evidence of foul play, and that Natalee probably drowned?  

I thought early on it was determined that the tide will bring a drowning victim back towards the shore, and that the tides in Aruba are very stable.  

How do we really know she was left alone at the beach?  Because Joran said so?  I really have trouble believing anything he says that can't be corroborated by another means.  

No indication of foul play?  Then what is everyone lying and changing stories for?

I found the reporting irresponsible.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Orangecrush on June 26, 2005, 10:43:03 AM
Thanks for heads up on the timeline post.  Very good.

Not trying to get everyone off your morning topic, but this timeline is very interesting:

1:30 am Natalee & Joran leave Carlos n Charlies in Deepak Kalpoe’s car with his brother Satish
2:00 am Deepak & Satish return home??/Deepak off work all day??
**[Jordan murdersNH or NH dies of overdose]**
2:30 am Joran calls Deepak for a ride
**[this doesn't make sense unless he killed her after he called depak]**
3:00 am Joran calls someone? Father?
**[Joran can't figure out what to do with the body calls home and father tells him to call off Depak ( a witness).  Joran upset so he txt messages him so not to hear his panic]**
3:15 am Deepak allegedly gets text message from Joran saying he’d found another ride
**[Okay now between 3:15 and 6:30, he has time to plan where to dispose the body....3 hours and 15 minutes....guess this could be enough time, but he had to have help. Dad and Steve???]**
6:30 am Call to or from Joran’s cellphone in area of Santa Lucia
**[if the call if from joran, much more significant.  Could be anyone calling TO him before school ]**.
7:30 am Joran in school bragging about sex with Natalee -- also saying she drowned??  
**[Never heard this, this is wild!!!]**


Title: Carving out.
Post by: Professor on June 26, 2005, 10:43:08 AM
Reading Anna's post about the use of the date-rape drug and the process of "carving out" a victim -- surrounded by men in a crowd, separated from her group, and herded to an awaiting car -- was chilling and disturbing. It certainly shows how someone like Natalee could be in such a dream state that she actually believed the car to be a taxi, and it explains how she might appear to be merely "tipsy" to her peers.

As I stated earlier, it doesn't matter what Natalee was drinking that night. By all reports, she was drinking responsibly. But in those LAST FEW MOMENTS before closing time, it seems highly likely that something might have been added to her drink.

This is the only explanation that seems consistent with all contemporaneous accounts.

And it is chilling. (Listen up, ladies. This is happening, today. They even have a name for it. Carving out.)

Add to that that Natalee's group was schedule to leave the island of Aruba the following day and you have the PERFECT OPPORTUNITY for a sociopath to take advantage of her and never face prosecution. That, and the fact that his father was a judge in training.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: rogers on June 26, 2005, 10:43:46 AM
Quote from: "arrabba"
Did anyone see the reporter on FOX earlier saying that there is no evidence of foul play, and that Natalee probably drowned?  

I thought early on it was determined that the tide will bring a drowning victim back towards the shore, and that the tides in Aruba are very stable.  

How do we really know she was left alone at the beach?  Because Joran said so?  I really have trouble believing anything he says that can't be corroborated by another means.  

No indication of foul play?  Then what is everyone lying and changing stories for?

I found the reporting irresponsible.

I claim no expertice on tides anywhere, particularly Aruba.  I have spent considerable time in the water off of the Palm Beach area and have marveled at the fact that is seems rather easy to drift all the way to Venezuala.  Perhaps there are other currents futher out that would push me back into Aruba. But..


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: absolut on June 26, 2005, 10:44:41 AM
Quote from: "Red"
Quote from: "absolut"
Do clocks in Aruba mean anything?

It is almost 9am, the hearing was supposed to start at 8:30.


hahaha ... Its 10.30 and still nothing. Obviously you may not be familair with this island term, "no problem".  :D

A do  believe the term "deadline" is also not in the vocabulary.

No offense Aruba, maybe a good thing ... less ulcers.


Um ulcers how did you do that? Its like you can see the future on FOX. :)


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: sarah on June 26, 2005, 10:46:24 AM
Professor --can you point me to this post?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: AZsunny on June 26, 2005, 10:50:55 AM
From Fox this morning, discussing Crowes comments:

"Any moment, we can have the solution," Croes said. "I don't think [Joran], if he really participated in the disappearance of this lady, I don't think he can hold out for so long knowing his father is detained." :arrow:

My question is if he thought his father was involved, would that not make him clam up more, so as not to implacate his father??   :?:


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: absolut on June 26, 2005, 10:51:05 AM
Editoral announcement.

When/if this case is over look for the Rumor/Breaking news thread in the News Issues area. General discussions will be going on there at all times when there is not a specific story grabbing our attention.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: rkymtncjngrl on June 26, 2005, 10:51:47 AM
Quote from: "sarah"
Professor --can you point me to this post?
 I would love to see this post too, as I have missed it somewhere along the line.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: nancy_drew on June 26, 2005, 10:52:21 AM
Quote from: "Red"
Quote from: "absolut"
What is it with Fox and the Monkey stories? :)


I was waiting for the opportune moment to use this. Ever wonder why Greta claims to own the story ...

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,160602,00.html

By Greta Van Susteren
Do we have a simian source on Aruba?

The Monkey is everywhere.  :D

Forgive me but after last nights late night and a definite lack of coffee this AM, could not resist. A little levity has to break in every so often.


I'm only on my first cuppa French Roast...but, I don't understand the point you're making here?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: PoorPaulaNNJ on June 26, 2005, 10:52:24 AM
Has anyone looked at Riehl Discussin Forum13 this morning? I see some talking about a rumor of Croes shipping something to UK? that weighed 100lb. Anyone else see that? Anyone heard that? I'm scratching my head and drinking coffee faster trying to ponder all the possibilities. Hmmm


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: sarah on June 26, 2005, 10:54:36 AM
Quote from: "rkymtncjngrl"
Quote from: "sarah"
Professor --can you point me to this post?
 I would love to see this post too, as I have missed it somewhere along the line.

Someone help us out here.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: klaasend on June 26, 2005, 10:55:13 AM
Quote from: "nancy_drew"
Quote from: "Red"
Quote from: "absolut"
What is it with Fox and the Monkey stories? :)


I was waiting for the opportune moment to use this. Ever wonder why Greta claims to own the story ...

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,160602,00.html

By Greta Van Susteren
Do we have a simian source on Aruba?

The Monkey is everywhere.  :D

Forgive me but after last nights late night and a definite lack of coffee this AM, could not resist. A little levity has to break in every so often.


I'm only on my first cuppa French Roast...but, I don't understand the point you're making here?

If you don't see the humor in this you definately need another cup of coffee.   :lol:


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: nancy_drew on June 26, 2005, 10:55:53 AM
Speaking of Dan's site...Someone just alerted me to a post there that concerns me.  Can anyone give further info on this? Have we spoken to Aruba Girl about this?

There was a report a few days ago that another girl in Aruba who was posting on the blogs as "Aruba Girl" was contacted by the Arubian authories and told to stop posting.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: KackyLacky on June 26, 2005, 10:56:26 AM
where has it been said joran bragged about a "drowning" much less sex. I haven't seen or heard anything except that the headmaster and other teachers told joran's mom to tell joran not to talk about the case at school. She then told her husband, who was reported to have called joran on his school bus and tell him to stop talking about it at school.

that is a very interesting entry on the timeline, I just wonder if we know it for fact or is it another rumor (although as we all know by now another word for fact in this case, until the courts tell us more)


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: PoorPaulaNNJ on June 26, 2005, 10:57:00 AM
Quote from: "nancy_drew"
Speaking of Dan's site...Someone just alerted me to a post there that concerns me.  Can anyone give further info on this? Have we spoken to Aruba Girl about this?

There was a report a few days ago that another girl in Aruba who was posting on the blogs as "Aruba Girl" was contacted by the Arubian authories and told to stop posting.


Yikes; that doesn't bode well, besides the fact of cutting us off. Hmmmff


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: nancy_drew on June 26, 2005, 10:57:56 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "nancy_drew"
Quote from: "Red"
Quote from: "absolut"
What is it with Fox and the Monkey stories? :)


I was waiting for the opportune moment to use this. Ever wonder why Greta claims to own the story ...

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,160602,00.html

By Greta Van Susteren
Do we have a simian source on Aruba?

The Monkey is everywhere.  :D

Forgive me but after last nights late night and a definite lack of coffee this AM, could not resist. A little levity has to break in every so often.


I'm only on my first cuppa French Roast...but, I don't understand the point you're making here?

If you don't see the humor in this you definately need another cup of coffee.   :lol:


Uhhhhhh....I've got a great sense of humor, I'll pour another cup...


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: sarah on June 26, 2005, 10:57:56 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "nancy_drew"
Quote from: "Red"
Quote from: "absolut"
What is it with Fox and the Monkey stories? :)


I was waiting for the opportune moment to use this. Ever wonder why Greta claims to own the story ...

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,160602,00.html

By Greta Van Susteren
Do we have a simian source on Aruba?

The Monkey is everywhere.  :D

Forgive me but after last nights late night and a definite lack of coffee this AM, could not resist. A little levity has to break in every so often.


I'm only on my first cuppa French Roast...but, I don't understand the point you're making here?

If you don't see the humor in this you definately need another cup of coffee.   :lol:


I thought it was both funny and sad at the same time.  Anyone who would think that you could use a monkey this way shows a lack of sophistication.  If this is the way the general population on the island thinks, then no wonder the case is in the current state.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: KackyLacky on June 26, 2005, 10:58:12 AM
absolut:

does SM have anyone hanging around the courthouse today?   :)


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: RB on June 26, 2005, 10:58:12 AM
Quote from: "nancy_drew"
Speaking of Dan's site...Someone just alerted me to a post there that concerns me.  Can anyone give further info on this? Have we spoken to Aruba Girl about this?

There was a report a few days ago that another girl in Aruba who was posting on the blogs as "Aruba Girl" was contacted by the Arubian authories and told to stop posting.


I think someone did ask her about a rumor that Arubans (not just Arubagirl) were asked to stop posting on messageboards, etc some days ago but there was nothing to it.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: klaasend on June 26, 2005, 10:59:47 AM
Quote from: "PoorPaulaNNJ"
Has anyone looked at Riehl Discussin Forum13 this morning? I see some talking about a rumor of Croes shipping something to UK? that weighed 100lb. Anyone else see that? Anyone heard that? I'm scratching my head and drinking coffee faster trying to ponder all the possibilities. Hmmm

If you read further you see that it was somones theory of something that could have happened.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: PoorPaulaNNJ on June 26, 2005, 11:00:39 AM
Lots of comments-you guys are all sleeping. So I'll continue. Next:
NATIVE TEXAN,
OH MY GOSH! 100 pound package sent by S. Croes. Is that a fact? I don't want to say this, but NH weighed about 100 pounds. Did someone call SC to get rid of something?

Posted by: philo | June 26, 2005 07:04 AM

Wondering if they can trace that 100# package from SC and see if/when it arrived and to whom it was addressed. Hope I'm wrong about its contents.

Posted by: philo | June 26, 2005 07:06 AM


Look......From Riehl; anyone see or hear this??????



Title: dark currents
Post by: iquitos on June 26, 2005, 11:01:03 AM
cnn did a piece on tides that had anythng taken a little way out going straight and fast to panama.  bodies float after three days, then sink again.  also had a guy say you stick a foot in the water after dark and you are on radar.  


Quote from: "arrabba"
Did anyone see the reporter on FOX earlier saying that there is no evidence of foul play, and that Natalee probably drowned?  

I thought early on it was determined that the tide will bring a drowning victim back towards the shore, and that the tides in Aruba are very stable.  

How do we really know she was left alone at the beach?  Because Joran said so?  I really have trouble believing anything he says that can't be corroborated by another means.  

No indication of foul play?  Then what is everyone lying and changing stories for?

I found the reporting irresponsible.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: PoorPaulaNNJ on June 26, 2005, 11:01:26 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "PoorPaulaNNJ"
Has anyone looked at Riehl Discussin Forum13 this morning? I see some talking about a rumor of Croes shipping something to UK? that weighed 100lb. Anyone else see that? Anyone heard that? I'm scratching my head and drinking coffee faster trying to ponder all the possibilities. Hmmm

If you read further you see that it was somones theory of something that could have happened.


Oh! Thanks, I'm still at the top-ish of the page.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: absolut on June 26, 2005, 11:01:44 AM
Quote from: "KackyLacky"
absolut:

does SM have anyone hanging around the courthouse today?   :)


We have not been contacted by the SM on the ground. But word is the SM was attempting to sccop Greta. :) Maybe the individual just doesn't have time while looking for Lorenzo's house or checking out the SBF security guard theory.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: sandy on June 26, 2005, 11:02:08 AM
Quote from: "nancy_drew"
Speaking of Dan's site...Someone just alerted me to a post there that concerns me.  Can anyone give further info on this? Have we spoken to Aruba Girl about this?

There was a report a few days ago that another girl in Aruba who was posting on the blogs as "Aruba Girl" was contacted by the Arubian authories and told to stop posting.


Maybe she's the next to go up the river so to speak - maybe she could be our inside source.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: RB on June 26, 2005, 11:02:55 AM
We have not been contacted by the SM on the ground. But word is the SM was attempting to sccop Greta.  Maybe the individual just doesn't have time while looking for Lorenzo's house or checking out the SBF security guard theory.

It takes a lot of time trying to get a date with Greta for lunch ;)


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Scott on June 26, 2005, 11:03:25 AM
Quote from: "RB"
Quote from: "nancy_drew"
Speaking of Dan's site...Someone just alerted me to a post there that concerns me.  Can anyone give further info on this? Have we spoken to Aruba Girl about this?

There was a report a few days ago that another girl in Aruba who was posting on the blogs as "Aruba Girl" was contacted by the Arubian authories and told to stop posting.


I think someone did ask her about a rumor that Arubans (not just Arubagirl) were asked to stop posting on messageboards, etc some days ago but there was nothing to it.


While they obviously don't have our Bill of Rights, is there really no Freedom of Speech in Aruba?

I say this, provisionally, that Aruba Girl is in no way a material witness to the case at hand.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: dragonfly on June 26, 2005, 11:03:41 AM
Quote from: "Red"
Quote from: "absolut"
What is it with Fox and the Monkey stories? :)


I was waiting for the opportune moment to use this. Ever wonder why Greta claims to own the story ...

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,160602,00.html

By Greta Van Susteren
Do we have a simian source on Aruba?

The Monkey is everywhere.  :D

Forgive me but after last nights late night and a definite lack of coffee this AM, could not resist. A little levity has to break in every so often.


lol, Red, that is funny.  We have sources everywhere, huh?   :lol:


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: coco on June 26, 2005, 11:03:44 AM
I'm gonna guess SM on the ground is still recouperating from his first night at CnC's!

reading in the background here while working ... got a big report due tomorrow and none of it's done yet so I'm bribing myself with SM pages for each section completed!

g;morning all!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: KackyLacky on June 26, 2005, 11:04:18 AM
Quote from: "absolut"
Quote from: "KackyLacky"
absolut:

does SM have anyone hanging around the courthouse today?   :)


We have not been contacted by the SM on the ground. But word is the SM was attempting to sccop Greta. :) Maybe the individual just doesn't have time while looking for Lorenzo's house or checking out the SBF security guard theory.


as long as the monkey in question does not hook up with our party girl LaRissa! Then again it is a vacation!  :lol:  :lol:


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: absolut on June 26, 2005, 11:04:21 AM
Quote from: "RB"
We have not been contacted by the SM on the ground. But word is the SM was attempting to sccop Greta.  Maybe the individual just doesn't have time while looking for Lorenzo's house or checking out the SBF security guard theory.

It takes a lot of time trying to get a date with Greta for lunch ;)


Especially if she is in Washington over the weekend :)


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Orangecrush on June 26, 2005, 11:04:30 AM
Quote from: "KackyLacky"
where has it been said joran bragged about a "drowning" much less sex. I haven't seen or heard anything except that the headmaster and other teachers told joran's mom to tell joran not to talk about the case at school. She then told her husband, who was reported to have called joran on his school bus and tell him to stop talking about it at school.

that is a very interesting entry on the timeline, I just wonder if we know it for fact or is it another rumor (although as we all know by now another word for fact in this case, until the courts tell us more)


Look at the Timeline Post on main page.  Never heard this before today, must be a compilation of rumors.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: rkymtncjngrl on June 26, 2005, 11:05:17 AM
Quote from: "nancy_drew"
Speaking of Dan's site...Someone just alerted me to a post there that concerns me.  Can anyone give further info on this? Have we spoken to Aruba Girl about this?

There was a report a few days ago that another girl in Aruba who was posting on the blogs as "Aruba Girl" was contacted by the Arubian authories and told to stop posting.
 Arubagirl has another thread going about taking pictures of different areas that people want to see.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: RB on June 26, 2005, 11:06:33 AM
Especially if she is in Washington over the weekend

His people will call her people....


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: arrabba on June 26, 2005, 11:06:39 AM
Quote from: "PoorPaulaNNJ"
Has anyone looked at Riehl Discussin Forum13 this morning? I see some talking about a rumor of Croes shipping something to UK? that weighed 100lb. Anyone else see that? Anyone heard that? I'm scratching my head and drinking coffee faster trying to ponder all the possibilities. Hmmm


I raced over and found this post:

Mary:

I posted something last night about a working theory that Steve Croes met a boat already en route from St. Lucia to Venezuela but the mention of "100 pound cargo" was strictly conjecture on my part. Maybe someone else has mentioned a 100# "box"?

I have just logged on with my first cup of coffee this morning so I'm just catching up with the posts from last night.

:NT w/ due respect to f&f of NH

Posted by: Native Texan | June 26, 2005 09:15 AM


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: KackyLacky on June 26, 2005, 11:08:23 AM
Tim Miller from Equusearch just said Van Straten (Aruban LE official) in a meeting just a little while ago told Miller " Just be successful" . LE knows something. Big Time!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: absolut on June 26, 2005, 11:10:09 AM
It is just my opinion but, posting 1 post at a time from another site does not really tell the whole story. I would suggest posting a link and a summary of the content. Then other posters can be pointed to the same link, then they can participate in a meaningful discussion.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 26, 2005, 11:10:13 AM
Quote from: "KackyLacky"
Tim Miller from Equusearch just said Van Straten (Aruban LE official) in a meeting just a little while ago told Miller " Just be successful" . LE knows something. Big Time!


I heard that also Kacky..  interesting!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: KackyLacky on June 26, 2005, 11:10:17 AM
Quote from: "arrabba"
Quote from: "PoorPaulaNNJ"
Has anyone looked at Riehl Discussin Forum13 this morning? I see some talking about a rumor of Croes shipping something to UK? that weighed 100lb. Anyone else see that? Anyone heard that? I'm scratching my head and drinking coffee faster trying to ponder all the possibilities. Hmmm


I raced over and found this post:

Mary:

I posted something last night about a working theory that Steve Croes met a boat already en route from St. Lucia to Venezuela but the mention of "100 pound cargo" was strictly conjecture on my part. Maybe someone else has mentioned a 100# "box"?

I have just logged on with my first cup of coffee this morning so I'm just catching up with the posts from last night.

:NT w/ due respect to f&f of NH

Posted by: Native Texan | June 26, 2005 09:15 AM



boy that is a lot of money in cocaine dollars  :roll:


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: PoorPaulaNNJ on June 26, 2005, 11:11:29 AM
Quote from: "coco"
I'm gonna guess SM on the ground is still recouperating from his first night at CnC's!

reading in the background here while working ... got a big report due tomorrow and none of it's done yet so I'm bribing myself with SM pages for each section completed!

g;morning all!


Coco;
That's how I do it too. Tell myself, 'self, do this first, then SM pages as reward..' It works.
hahahaha


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: RB on June 26, 2005, 11:11:58 AM
Tim Miller from Equusearch just said Van Straten (Aruban LE official) in a meeting just a little while ago told Miller " Just be successful" . LE knows something. Big Time!

"Just be successful" can be worrisome, too.  Sounds like they have a good idea what happened, but they want some explosive evidence so they can charge the suspects and take them to trial.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: pinemeadows on June 26, 2005, 11:13:54 AM
Quote from: "KackyLacky"
absolut:

does SM have anyone hanging around the courthouse today?   :)


Hey, where's Rob?  Isn't he there?  Shouldn't he be reporting on this?????   :wink:


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: nancy_drew on June 26, 2005, 11:14:18 AM
Quote from: "coco"
I'm gonna guess SM on the ground is still recouperating from his first night at CnC's!

reading in the background here while working ... got a big report due tomorrow and none of it's done yet so I'm bribing myself with SM pages for each section completed!

g;morning all!


I have a report due tomorrow too.  Yikes.  I gotta get crackin'....


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: PoorPaulaNNJ on June 26, 2005, 11:14:26 AM
Here's the link.......
http://www.riehlworldview.com/carnivorous_conservative/2005/06/natalee_hollowa_45.html


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: iquitos on June 26, 2005, 11:15:18 AM
Quote from: "arrabba"
Quote from: "PoorPaulaNNJ"
Has anyone looked at Riehl Discussin Forum13 this morning? I see some talking about a rumor of Croes shipping something to UK? that weighed 100lb. Anyone else see that? Anyone heard that? I'm scratching my head and drinking coffee faster trying to ponder all the possibilities. Hmmm


I raced over and found this post:

Mary:

I posted something last night about a working theory that Steve Croes met a boat already en route from St. Lucia to Venezuela but the mention of "100 pound cargo" was strictly conjecture on my part. Maybe someone else has mentioned a 100# "box"?

I have just logged on with my first cup of coffee this morning so I'm just catching up with the posts from last night.

:NT w/ due respect to f&f of NH

Posted by: Native Texan | June 26, 2005 09:15 AM


  i assume this is a post.  could you put it up so Monkeys we can parse (climb all over) it instead of leaving it out there hanging like a sad monkey tail?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: absolut on June 26, 2005, 11:15:41 AM
Quote from: "pinemeadows"
Quote from: "KackyLacky"
absolut:

does SM have anyone hanging around the courthouse today?   :)


Hey, where's Rob?  Isn't he there?  Shouldn't he be reporting on this?????   :wink:


We have promoted rob's title to SM on the ground, sounds more covert and if he gets that lunch date with greta monday ya know we would want to keep the names out of it. :)


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: klaasend on June 26, 2005, 11:16:08 AM
Quote from: "pinemeadows"
Quote from: "KackyLacky"
absolut:

does SM have anyone hanging around the courthouse today?   :)


Hey, where's Rob?  Isn't he there?  Shouldn't he be reporting on this?????   :wink:

He's busy putting on his "Scared Monkey Speedos" for his photo op. :lol:


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: PoorPaulaNNJ on June 26, 2005, 11:18:29 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "pinemeadows"
Quote from: "KackyLacky"
absolut:

does SM have anyone hanging around the courthouse today?   :)


Hey, where's Rob?  Isn't he there?  Shouldn't he be reporting on this?????   :wink:

He's busy putting on his "Scared Monkey Speedos" for his photo op. :lol:


I heard he was leaning up against the wall at CnC to blend in with that monkey mural they have up there so he can monitor photos being taken there.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: golden on June 26, 2005, 11:19:03 AM
Quote from: "nancy_drew"
Speaking of Dan's site...Someone just alerted me to a post there that concerns me.  Can anyone give further info on this? Have we spoken to Aruba Girl about this?

There was a report a few days ago that another girl in Aruba who was posting on the blogs as "Aruba Girl" was contacted by the Arubian authories and told to stop posting.


I don't know whether it's true or not, but I've heard on a fewl blogs that several Aruban posters  have been contacted by authorities. They were supposedly giving out to much information.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: iquitos on June 26, 2005, 11:19:29 AM
Quote from: "PoorPaulaNNJ"
Here's the link.......
http://www.riehlworldview.com/carnivorous_conservative/2005/06/natalee_hollowa_45.html


MY TAKE:  I LOOKED, 100 LB PACKAGE WAS A THEORY THAT TURNED INTO A RUMOR.  NO SUPPORTING EVIDENCE.  SUGGEST MONKEYS SHOULD DIGEST AND EXCRETE.  (caps for emphasis only, not yelling)


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: arubagirl on June 26, 2005, 11:19:41 AM
Hi guys

As you all know I'm still posting, and no one asked me stop, except perhaps my mother. See: posting posting posting.

As for someone asking another local to stop posting, I really doubt as a) I don't think may Arubans know about message boards 2) Have the obsession (anal) to post very frequently, and 3) I don't think that the cops can figure out with a post who the person was to call her and tell her to stop posting.

TOP 95 is camped out in front of the courthouse, they're still busy. Stupid judge, hurry up already.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: KackyLacky on June 26, 2005, 11:20:01 AM
In Aruban law, is DNA enough? I wouldn't think so. I know many have said on TV "no body, no charges" But there also has been a report that in the Netherlands a case was tried without a body. Perhaps Arubans have not made that scary leap of trying someone for murder based on circumstantial evidence. It is hard to watch an attorney sum up to a jury that just because the "missing person" hasn't been seen in a year, doesn't mean they don't exist somewhere else in the world. I would imagine it would be particularly hard to convict or even bring charges on any island with such a tourist, mobile population.
Here in the States, it has not been all that long ago the same thing applied here. It probably has only been in the last 25 yrs that US LE and juries would or could accept purely circumstantial evidence of murder. Especially once a suspect admits to some sort of sexual contact from whince DNA could be extracted.
I am not talking about the murders resulting in blood evidence, I am talking more like the peterson or cuthberson cases.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: iquitos on June 26, 2005, 11:20:29 AM
Quote from: "golden"
Quote from: "nancy_drew"
Speaking of Dan's site...Someone just alerted me to a post there that concerns me.  Can anyone give further info on this? Have we spoken to Aruba Girl about this?

There was a report a few days ago that another girl in Aruba who was posting on the blogs as "Aruba Girl" was contacted by the Arubian authories and told to stop posting.


I don't know whether it's true or not, but I've heard on a fewl blogs that several Aruban posters  have been contacted by authorities. They were supposedly giving out to much information.


maybe aruba girl was posting from jail last night.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: RB on June 26, 2005, 11:20:36 AM
Quote from: "iquitos"
Quote from: "PoorPaulaNNJ"
Here's the link.......
http://www.riehlworldview.com/carnivorous_conservative/2005/06/natalee_hollowa_45.html


MY TAKE:  I LOOKED, 100 LB PACKAGE WAS A THEORY THAT TURNED INTO A RUMOR.  NO SUPPORTING EVIDENCE.  SUGGEST MONKEYS SHOULD DIGEST AND EXCRETE.  (caps for emphasis only, not yelling)


No throwing the monkey poop....makes the guests nervous...


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: PoorPaulaNNJ on June 26, 2005, 11:20:48 AM
Quote from: "iquitos"
Quote from: "PoorPaulaNNJ"
Here's the link.......
http://www.riehlworldview.com/carnivorous_conservative/2005/06/natalee_hollowa_45.html


MY TAKE:  I LOOKED, 100 LB PACKAGE WAS A THEORY THAT TURNED INTO A RUMOR.  NO SUPPORTING EVIDENCE.  SUGGEST MONKEYS SHOULD DIGEST AND EXCRETE.  (caps for emphasis only, not yelling)



Hadn't read all the way down the page yet. Just grab when I see something. But someone said it's just theory.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: PoorPaulaNNJ on June 26, 2005, 11:22:33 AM
Quote from: "arubagirl"
Hi guys

As you all know I'm still posting, and no one asked me stop, except perhaps my mother. See: posting posting posting.

As for someone asking another local to stop posting, I really doubt as a) I don't think may Arubans know about message boards 2) Have the obsession (anal) to post very frequently, and 3) I don't think that the cops can figure out with a post who the person was to call her and tell her to stop posting.

TOP 95 is camped out in front of the courthouse, they're still busy. Stupid judge, hurry up already.


Speaking of the Monkey.  :lol:  Good morning, ArubaGirl


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: arubagirl on June 26, 2005, 11:22:35 AM
Oooooh, defense attorneys.

I worked one summer for a lawfirm, and what do they do: The main job is to prepare briefs (i.e. paperwork). They don't argue in front of the judge with opening statements / closing statements etc. They just write at all, but supporting documents with the briefs and submit it to the court. They do appear in court, wearing nifty robes, but it doesn't take such a long time.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: absolut on June 26, 2005, 11:22:45 AM
This thread will lock in 6 pages.

Your friendly heads up :)


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: DT on June 26, 2005, 11:23:42 AM
So whats new this morning?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: iquitos on June 26, 2005, 11:24:21 AM
Quote from: "PoorPaulaNNJ"
Quote from: "iquitos"
Quote from: "PoorPaulaNNJ"
Here's the link.......
http://www.riehlworldview.com/carnivorous_conservative/2005/06/natalee_hollowa_45.html


MY TAKE:  I LOOKED, 100 LB PACKAGE WAS A THEORY THAT TURNED INTO A RUMOR.  NO SUPPORTING EVIDENCE.  SUGGEST MONKEYS SHOULD DIGEST AND EXCRETE.  (caps for emphasis only, not yelling)



Hadn't read all the way down the page yet. Just grab when I see something. But someone said it's just theory.


thanks for putting up the link.  i looked once and did not scroll thru.  after you put it up again i did a find on it.  theory (possibly from a Monkey) turns rumor.  the theortical shipment was to another island i thought.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: RB on June 26, 2005, 11:24:29 AM
They do appear in court, wearing nifty robes, but it doesn't take such a long time.

Nothing like some descriptive fashion to complete the picture :)  Morning Arubagirl


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: arubagirl on June 26, 2005, 11:24:38 AM
I'm fairly sure that we accept DNA, but unfortunately if DNA appears in the car of the Kalpoe brothers in the form of a hair, for example, that wouldn't be anythign earthshocking, as they admit they were in the car with NH.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Curiosity on June 26, 2005, 11:25:31 AM
Quote from: "DT"
So whats new this morning?


Impatiently waiting for the judge to render a decision.  :evil:  :D


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: PoorPaulaNNJ on June 26, 2005, 11:25:41 AM
At leaast they don't have to wear the wigs. Ewwwhh


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: iquitos on June 26, 2005, 11:26:32 AM
Quote from: "arubagirl"
Oooooh, defense attorneys.

I worked one summer for a lawfirm, and what do they do: The main job is to prepare briefs (i.e. paperwork). They don't argue in front of the judge with opening statements / closing statements etc. They just write at all, but supporting documents with the briefs and submit it to the court. They do appear in court, wearing nifty robes, but it doesn't take such a long time.
 

AG:  thanks.  is this a system where after the investigative phase they basically conduct the trial on paper?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: DT on June 26, 2005, 11:26:37 AM
Quote from: "Curiosity"
Quote from: "DT"
So whats new this morning?


Impatiently waiting for the judge to render a decision.  :evil:  :D


What's the speculation about the decision? Anyone going to be released?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: golden on June 26, 2005, 11:26:40 AM
Quote from: "iquitos"
Quote from: "golden"


I don't know whether it's true or not, but I've heard on a fewl blogs that several Aruban posters  have been contacted by authorities. They were supposedly giving out to much information.


maybe aruba girl was posting from jail last night.[/quote]


 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: absolut on June 26, 2005, 11:27:29 AM
Quote from: "DT"
Quote from: "Curiosity"
Quote from: "DT"
So whats new this morning?


Impatiently waiting for the judge to render a decision.  :evil:  :D


What's the speculation about the decision? Anyone going to be released?


Not in my book, but I do see being held for different reasons.


Title: step cousin
Post by: dl3fan on June 26, 2005, 11:27:31 AM
If one of Natalee's step cousins did get in an alleged pushing match/confrontation with Joran at CNC earlier in the week I have a hard time believing he would want to play poker with him at HI after that.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: arubagirl on June 26, 2005, 11:27:51 AM
iquitos, basically. Guess they figure it saves time.

There are some cases divorce / banruptcy that they don't even have to appear in court, just submit the paperwork, get the answering paperwork from the court, and case over.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: la_cavaličre on June 26, 2005, 11:28:13 AM
I doubt Joran told his classmates that Natalee drowned. I think this came from the story about the Alabama group descending on the International School, armed with posters of Natalee topped with the word "KIDNAPPED." The headmaster objected to the word "kidnapped" because there may be another explanation for her disappearance, such as drowning.


Title: Tough read...
Post by: Hat on June 26, 2005, 11:28:16 AM
How about these Aruba LE people? May be way more competent than we are giving credit for. How in the world would they arrest PVDS if they were not certain of a significant level of guilt on some aspect of a crime(S). To do so without that certainty, and certainty of Jordan's knowledge of fathers guilt, would surely telegraph to Jordan that LE had no hard evidence and is desperate for a confession. That would make the overgrown overachiever more dutch stubborn in his silence or denial. Too risky a move if not great evidence on Dad. They cannot be so stupid...?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: arubagirl on June 26, 2005, 11:28:41 AM
dl3fan, as I understand it, it wasn't one of the cousins.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: KackyLacky on June 26, 2005, 11:28:51 AM
Quote from: "absolut"
Quote from: "pinemeadows"
Quote from: "KackyLacky"
absolut:

does SM have anyone hanging around the courthouse today?   :)


Hey, where's Rob?  Isn't he there?  Shouldn't he be reporting on this?????   :wink:


We have promoted rob's title to SM on the ground, sounds more covert and if he gets that lunch date with greta monday ya know we would want to keep the names out of it. :)



or for short " Ground Monkey"
You know, he could be considered "embedded"..........mmmmmmmmmmm Perhaps he is  :lol:  :lol:


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: arubagirl on June 26, 2005, 11:30:11 AM
After lunch we're going to pass by the courthouse if there is nothing new.

You guys want pictures?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Compananzi on June 26, 2005, 11:31:03 AM
Quote from: "iquitos"
Quote from: "golden"
Quote from: "nancy_drew"
Speaking of Dan's site...Someone just alerted me to a post there that concerns me.  Can anyone give further info on this? Have we spoken to Aruba Girl about this?

There was a report a few days ago that another girl in Aruba who was posting on the blogs as "Aruba Girl" was contacted by the Arubian authories and told to stop posting.


I don't know whether it's true or not, but I've heard on a fewl blogs that several Aruban posters  have been contacted by authorities. They were supposedly giving out to much information.


maybe aruba girl was posting from jail last night.


Sounds more like an intimidation tactic to spread lies and unconfirmed heresay.  The pressure to suppress is any negative or contradictory report about Natalee, MB student, Chaparone/Parents or any events of the whereabouts is prevalent.


Title: Re: step cousin
Post by: Ting on June 26, 2005, 11:32:04 AM
Quote from: "dl3fan"
If one of Natalee's step cousins did get in an alleged pushing match/confrontation with Joran at CNC earlier in the week I have a hard time believing he would want to play poker with him at HI after that.


And I think it would be unusual if Natalee would dance with Joran after such an incident.

Do we know if the cousin was at Carlos & Charlie's the last night of the trip?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: KackyLacky on June 26, 2005, 11:32:04 AM
Quote from: "RB"
They do appear in court, wearing nifty robes, but it doesn't take such a long time.

Nothing like some descriptive fashion to complete the picture :)  Morning Arubagirl


as long as the robes are not blue and white plaid  8)


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: clevfan1234 on June 26, 2005, 11:33:11 AM
fox reporter just said that one of the brother's emailed steve croes that night, so that must be why he is being held


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Compananzi on June 26, 2005, 11:33:12 AM
Quote from: "arubagirl"
After lunch we're going to pass by the courthouse if there is nothing new.

You guys want pictures?


Yes take a picture of Marianna and Reuben, the other lady spokes person that appeared on Hannity and Combs as well.   Id like glossy autograph photos.. :oops:


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: absolut on June 26, 2005, 11:33:14 AM
Steve got an email in the middle of the night from one of the brothers.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: inthepacific on June 26, 2005, 11:33:14 AM
Quote from: "arubagirl"
After lunch we're going to pass by the courthouse if there is nothing new.

You guys want pictures?



Would love too see a picture of the courthouse.

Thanks arubagirl!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: arubagirl on June 26, 2005, 11:33:52 AM
compananzi, as we didn't know NH, it's not like we can spread info about her.

Now, about the MB students, I don't know. My cousin who was in C&C during their stay said that they were pretty wild, but I believe I read somewhere that there was another group, so I don't know if he meant them or the other group.

However, I want to point out that in MY opinion it's not strange for U.S. young tourists to act wild, drink, party, etc. It's very usual and logical, even. Most local teens don't do it because the stories will come back to your parents, exagerated tenfold. Who wants to deal with that?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: DT on June 26, 2005, 11:34:59 AM
Quote from: "Compananzi"
Quote from: "iquitos"
Quote from: "golden"
Quote from: "nancy_drew"
Speaking of Dan's site...Someone just alerted me to a post there that concerns me.  Can anyone give further info on this? Have we spoken to Aruba Girl about this?

There was a report a few days ago that another girl in Aruba who was posting on the blogs as "Aruba Girl" was contacted by the Arubian authories and told to stop posting.


I don't know whether it's true or not, but I've heard on a fewl blogs that several Aruban posters  have been contacted by authorities. They were supposedly giving out to much information.


maybe aruba girl was posting from jail last night.


Sounds more like an intimidation tactic to spread lies and unconfirmed heresay.  The pressure to suppress is any negative or contradictory report about Natalee, MB student, Chaparone/Parents or any events of the whereabouts is prevalent.


Uhm no such thing has been said,  but hey you don't let that stop you from believing rumors as fact.  The is no campaign by anyone to silence anyone else.  I wish people would get off of this consipracy bullshit.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: dragonfly on June 26, 2005, 11:35:02 AM
Quote from: "clevfan1234"
fox reporter just said that one of the brother's emailed steve croes that night, so that must be why he is being held


Yeah, I heard that and found it interesting.  That's the first I've heard of it and it helps explain why they have been holding him all this time.  Hmmmmmm...


Title: scuffles
Post by: iquitos on June 26, 2005, 11:35:35 AM
Holloway’s friends saw van der Sloot both in the casino at the hotel where they were staying and at Carlos’N Charlies’, and a friend of Holloway said van der Sloot , a tall, broad-shouldered athlete , got into a scuffle with some of the Mountain Brook guys at the bar.

“I broke it up,” said Bryan Reynolds, 18. “It was outside the Carlos’N Charlies’ the second night we were there.”

Reynolds didn’t elaborate, and Barron said people who went on the trip aren’t publicly discussing details of what happened in Aruba at the request of Holloway’s family, which fears the publicity could hamper the investigation.

Dallas Also wrote:
LouLou wrote:
...4. Also Earlier articles, however, state that Joran was talking to her at C'nCs the 2nd night the group was there, and that's what caused the "scuffle". Seeing that her classmates did not approve of her new love interest, the romance might have been on the down low from that point...with people who observed her on the last night only presuming that she was meeting him for the first time.



The "scuffle" was a shouting match between Joran and Thomas Twitty. Yes, Twitty. Thomas Twitty is Natalee's step-cousin!!!

So actually, she had family that didn't approve of him right off the bat. The shouting match happened on 6-29-05, which is the same day she went to C'nCs and then went missing.


Dallas how did you find out it was one of her cousins? I appreciate you posting the info bc I had wondered who the scuffle was between. Its very interesting that it was a family member. That being said, I wonder what they didnt like about Joran? I also wonder what they told her mother about him. Very interesting.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: KackyLacky on June 26, 2005, 11:35:59 AM
Quote from: "clevfan1234"
fox reporter just said that one of the brother's emailed steve croes that night, so that must be why he is being held


yes I heard that, and then croes comes in to LE as a witness at first repeating the email/initial story/lie/adjustment---thus obstructing justice and joining his internet buddies in the pokey


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: nancy_drew on June 26, 2005, 11:36:20 AM
Quote from: "clevfan1234"
fox reporter just said that one of the brother's emailed steve croes that night, so that must be why he is being held


I'm pretty sure McKinley said that was the "buzz" but nothing is confirmed about that.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: bigpoodle on June 26, 2005, 11:37:16 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "pinemeadows"
Quote from: "KackyLacky"
absolut:

does SM have anyone hanging around the courthouse today?   :)


Hey, where's Rob?  Isn't he there?  Shouldn't he be reporting on this?????   :wink:

He's busy putting on his "Scared Monkey Speedos" for his photo op. :lol:


lol...that gives a whole new meaning to "scared monkey."!!! :lol:


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: spab on June 26, 2005, 11:37:17 AM
Quote from: "absolut"
Steve got an email in the middle of the night from one of the brothers.



... must have been one helluva an email to wind up in jail over.. :?


What could it possibly have said?


Title: Just an idea
Post by: Lausa on June 26, 2005, 11:37:33 AM
G'morning, all.

I stay up late, I rise early.  I read Monkeys inbetween.  This will go down as "My Summer of the Monkeys" for sure.  Thank heaven school's out.

My concern is the way that a statement/rumor -- previously  disproven -- can continue to come up as if for the first time (and for the poster concerned, it may well be the first time).  Each time someone repeats it, subtle variations get added.  Dispelling a rumor or correcting misinformation can take many more posts.

It reminds me a little of the game "Secret" where one person whispers to the next, and on around the circle, til you get to the end and compare the first message to the final message -- wild and often comic deviation between the two versions, usually.

Is there any way that moderators can have a official rubber stamp with a red ink "NOT!" that could be affixed over these repeats, not so as to obliterate the message, but to alert the long time reader that this is more of the same old, same old.  This may, in computer-land, be an impossible task.  

Moderators, we ask a lot of you.  You always deliver.  We are grateful.  I've visited many forums and this is by far the most consistently respectful, well-spoken. and illuminating one I've found.  That said, I wish you all a good day!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Compananzi on June 26, 2005, 11:37:36 AM
Quote from: "DT"
Quote from: "Compananzi"
Quote from: "iquitos"
Quote from: "golden"
Quote from: "nancy_drew"
Speaking of Dan's site...Someone just alerted me to a post there that concerns me.  Can anyone give further info on this? Have we spoken to Aruba Girl about this?

There was a report a few days ago that another girl in Aruba who was posting on the blogs as "Aruba Girl" was contacted by the Arubian authories and told to stop posting.


I don't know whether it's true or not, but I've heard on a fewl blogs that several Aruban posters  have been contacted by authorities. They were supposedly giving out to much information.


maybe aruba girl was posting from jail last night.


Sounds more like an intimidation tactic to spread lies and unconfirmed heresay.  The pressure to suppress is any negative or contradictory report about Natalee, MB student, Chaparone/Parents or any events of the whereabouts is prevalent.


Uhm no such thing has been said,  but hey you don't let that stop you from believing rumors as fact.  The is no campaign by anyone to silence anyone else.  I wish people would get off of this consipracy bullshit.


I don't see you stopping rumors of Joran?!  My last count we have at least 50 different scenarios...and maybe one shaky scernary that he may actually have left her to her own accord...again just another speculation.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: arubagirl on June 26, 2005, 11:37:45 AM
spab, if he lied about it, that's a reason right there.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Herkimer on June 26, 2005, 11:38:43 AM
Quote from: "spab"
Quote from: "absolut"
Steve got an email in the middle of the night from one of the brothers.



... must have been one helluva an email to wind up in jail over.. :?


What could it possibly have said?


Hi Steve:

Think we could borrow the Too Tattoo for a while?

bye bye

Deepak


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: arubagirl on June 26, 2005, 11:40:22 AM
Heeeeeeeee


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: KackyLacky on June 26, 2005, 11:40:39 AM
Quote from: "spab"
Quote from: "absolut"
Steve got an email in the middle of the night from one of the brothers.



... must have been one helluva an email to wind up in jail over.. :?


What could it possibly have said?


well I am offering this as no confirmation it is for real this is going around, and many of the things it says have panned out so far.
http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/Discussion/viewtopic.php?t=201&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=340


Title: eamil
Post by: iquitos on June 26, 2005, 11:40:41 AM
steve:  got space in the tattoo reefer?  d.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Ting on June 26, 2005, 11:40:47 AM
Quote
It reminds me a little of the game "Secret"


LOL I have thought that several times, reading these posts.

The mayor of Birmingham tells his tailor something or other, and three pages down, he told it to his barber, so all we are left with is that Birmingham has a natty chatty mayor!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: harleymom on June 26, 2005, 11:41:44 AM
Quote from: "arubagirl"

However, I want to point out that in MY opinion it's not strange for U.S. young tourists to act wild, drink, party, etc. It's very usual and logical, even. Most local teens don't do it because the stories will come back to your parents, exagerated tenfold. Who wants to deal with that?


From my experience both as a partying teen and mother of teens.."What goes on in ______ Stays in _______" is the most used phrased.  For me what I did abroad would get me grounded for life.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Lausa on June 26, 2005, 11:41:45 AM
Quote from: "KackyLacky"
Quote from: "KackyLacky"
absolut:

We have promoted rob's title to SM on the ground, sounds


Silent Monkey on the Ground = SMOG?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: waitingtoknow on June 26, 2005, 11:41:50 AM
Good Morning all...been lurking for a bit

How long have they been in court?  AND  How long does this type of court appearance usually take?  anybody know?  Thanks in advance  :D


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: KackyLacky on June 26, 2005, 11:41:57 AM
Quote from: "Ting"
Quote
It reminds me a little of the game "Secret"


LOL I have thought that several times, reading these posts.

The mayor of Birmingham tells his tailor something or other, and three pages down, he told it to his barber, so all we are left with is that Birmingham has a natty chatty mayor!


or natty chatty barber


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: spab on June 26, 2005, 11:42:13 AM
Quote from: "Herkimer"
Quote from: "spab"
Quote from: "absolut"
Steve got an email in the middle of the night from one of the brothers.



... must have been one helluva an email to wind up in jail over.. :?


What could it possibly have said?


Hi Steve:

Think we could borrow the Too Tattoo for a while?

bye bye

Deepak



...lmao!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: arubagirl on June 26, 2005, 11:42:32 AM
Eating lunch. Bye


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: DT on June 26, 2005, 11:43:47 AM
Quote from: "Compananzi"
Quote from: "DT"
Quote from: "Compananzi"
Quote from: "iquitos"
Quote from: "golden"
Quote from: "nancy_drew"
Speaking of Dan's site...Someone just alerted me to a post there that concerns me.  Can anyone give further info on this? Have we spoken to Aruba Girl about this?

There was a report a few days ago that another girl in Aruba who was posting on the blogs as "Aruba Girl" was contacted by the Arubian authories and told to stop posting.


I don't know whether it's true or not, but I've heard on a fewl blogs that several Aruban posters  have been contacted by authorities. They were supposedly giving out to much information.


maybe aruba girl was posting from jail last night.


Sounds more like an intimidation tactic to spread lies and unconfirmed heresay.  The pressure to suppress is any negative or contradictory report about Natalee, MB student, Chaparone/Parents or any events of the whereabouts is prevalent.


Uhm no such thing has been said,  but hey you don't let that stop you from believing rumors as fact.  The is no campaign by anyone to silence anyone else.  I wish people would get off of this consipracy bullshit.


I don't see you stopping rumors of Joran?!  My last count we have at least 50 different scenarios...and maybe one shaky scernary that he may actually have left her to her own accord...again just another speculation.


Don't get me wrong, I think their is bullshit on both sides.  Theories like Joran being making pornos with 13 year olds, and what not are complete crap and should be viewed as such.  I'll agree that I tend to view him less favorably given that it is almost certain that he had something to do with the disappearence, but I still think that he and his family shouldn't have to deal with unwarranted personal attacks.


Title: Re: Just an idea
Post by: absolut on June 26, 2005, 11:43:50 AM
Quote from: "Lausa"
G'morning, all.

I stay up late, I rise early.  I read Monkeys inbetween.  This will go down as "My Summer of the Monkeys" for sure.  Thank heaven school's out.

My concern is the way that a statement/rumor -- previously  disproven -- can continue to come up as if for the first time (and for the poster concerned, it may well be the first time).  Each time someone repeats it, subtle variations get added.  Dispelling a rumor or correcting misinformation can take many more posts.

It reminds me a little of the game "Secret" where one person whispers to the next, and on around the circle, til you get to the end and compare the first message to the final message -- wild and often comic deviation between the two versions, usually.

Is there any way that moderators can have a official rubber stamp with a red ink "NOT!" that could be affixed over these repeats, not so as to obliterate the message, but to alert the long time reader that this is more of the same old, same old.  This may, in computer-land, be an impossible task.  

Moderators, we ask a lot of you.  You always deliver.  We are grateful.  I've visited many forums and this is by far the most consistently respectful, well-spoken. and illuminating one I've found.  That said, I wish you all a good day!


The short answer is no. With over 1000 post a day and growing on the forum validating each post would be impossible. The other issue with the concept in this case is that things 3 days ago believed to be proved fact today could be false and vice versa, the confusion of stamping them one way or another would be a disservice. Finally, we have already found that we all cannot agree even on the "facts" that are deemed to be credible. So the dispelling would have to be done by committee and by no means is that fair.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: spab on June 26, 2005, 11:44:38 AM
Quote from: "arubagirl"
spab, if he lied about it, that's a reason right there.



... you're right arubagirl.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Curiosity on June 26, 2005, 11:44:50 AM
Quote from: "spab"
Quote from: "absolut"
Steve got an email in the middle of the night from one of the brothers.



... must have been one helluva an email to wind up in jail over.. :?


What could it possibly have said?


Maybe something like that wonderwoman email......now I'm wondering if that email is true and it was being sent out to start an alibi??? ANyone getting a headache thinking of all the possibilities??


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: absolut on June 26, 2005, 11:45:09 AM
Quote from: "spab"
Quote from: "absolut"
Steve got an email in the middle of the night from one of the brothers.



... must have been one helluva an email to wind up in jail over.. :?


What could it possibly have said?


See the email thread in the Natalee index, thats what I think it said, at least an early version of it.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: mojo on June 26, 2005, 11:45:49 AM
off topic i know and i apologize, but since arubagirl's on.....

what news of DJTaylor?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: PoorPaulaNNJ on June 26, 2005, 11:46:33 AM
This is from America's Most Wanted, second to the last paragraph at the bottom.
http://www.amw.com/missing_persons/case.cfm?id=32411
According to Natalee's stepmother, Robin Holloway, friends say Natalee was last seen with a local resident who claimed to be a foreign exchange student (AP).

Yesterday, I went to the MSN webspace (sorry, don't have link), and I read a statement along these lines....Natalie was very active in a ?group? which was for foreign exchange student promotion. And then it was said that maybe her involvement and participation in the group was used against her.
Interesting to say the least, especially since John Walsh AMW site says Joran claimed to be a foreign exchange student. Hmmmmmm  
Anyone else see or hear about this?  Has it caused speculation??


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: puggywug on June 26, 2005, 11:47:45 AM
Hi, Monkeys!  Any news from the court proceedings or Equusearch?  Any news at all?  Thanks!  :D


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: nancy_drew on June 26, 2005, 11:48:17 AM
Quote from: "KackyLacky"
Quote from: "spab"
Quote from: "absolut"
Steve got an email in the middle of the night from one of the brothers.



... must have been one helluva an email to wind up in jail over.. :?


What could it possibly have said?


well I am offering this as no confirmation it is for real this is going around, and many of the things it says have panned out so far.
http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/Discussion/viewtopic.php?t=201&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=340


You mean the purported Depak email?  I certainly do doubt Depak sent an email in the middle of the night.  His mother said he stayed up all night  on the computer routinely.  HOWEVER,  I'm not ready to say that's the only reason, or the reason at all...yesterday, an Aruban official mentioned Steve's access to a dingy...so, I'm not ready to make a final assessment yet.  It could be both...or none of the above.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Ting on June 26, 2005, 11:49:32 AM
Quote from: "PoorPaulaNNJ"
This is from America's Most Wanted, second to the last paragraph at the bottom.
http://www.amw.com/missing_persons/case.cfm?id=32411
According to Natalee's stepmother, Robin Holloway, friends say Natalee was last seen with a local resident who claimed to be a foreign exchange student (AP)....statement along these lines....Natalie was very active in a ?group? which was for foreign exchange student promotion. ..Has it caused speculation??


It caused me to speculate that one of the first things I would have asked is that everything that could be retrieved from her computer be looked at to see to whom she may have chatted about her upcoming trip to Aruba.


Title: Weird facts...
Post by: grits on June 26, 2005, 11:50:12 AM
after lurking here for weeks now, I did some research on this case from a different angle:

Thomas B. Twitty is head of Investment Services for AmSouth Bank

AmSouth Bank while appearing to be a U.S. bank is actually owned by AmSouth Bancorporation and is according to SEC filings a foreign corporation but I cannot find anywhere on the Net what country it is incorporated in

Tom Twitty of Birmingham filed a new corporation in Rhode Island on 10/22/2004 and it is named AmSouth Investment Services.  

AmSouth Bank has been in trouble with SEC for several cases in late 2004 but most interesting for money laundering

from the SEC case Oct 2004:

" WHEREAS, AmSouth and the Bank have consented to the assessment of a civil
money penalty by the Board of Governors in the amount of ten million dollars
($10,000,000) for the Bank's aforementioned violations of law and regulation and
unsafe and unsound practices, and by the U.S. Department of the Treasury's
Financial Crimes Enforcement Network ("FinCEN") for violations of the anti-money
laundering program and suspicious activity reporting requirements of the BSA;"

Also, there was a lawsuit because AIS or AmSouth Investment Services is a seperate corp entity from AmSouth Bank yet this wasn't revealed to customers...

So...could this be disappearance be a kidnapping aimed at Tom Twitty either to keep him quiet or as revenge by some party or parties who lost money yet he didn't as he is still employed by the bank

this is also the same bank where Natalie's fund is set up...

just a thought


Title: Word-A-Dau
Post by: Lausa on June 26, 2005, 11:52:05 AM
Quote from: "iquitos"
steve:  got space in the tattoo reefer?  d.
Iquitos, I never realized there were so many definitions for "reefer" until I got curious about what you mean by "the tattoo reefer".   Reefer, to me, meant one thing, something you smoke.  Now I believe you meant something along these lines?.

refrigerated container
www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/policy/army/fm/55-80/gloss.htm
Refrigerated cargo, whether breakbulk or containerized. Also refers to a ship's capability to handle such cargo, and storage areas, containers, etc., used to store and transport them.
www.sjport.com/english/about/glossary_terms.html

::hits self on side of head -- DUH::


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Time-again on June 26, 2005, 11:53:14 AM
The suspects were all Internet savvy, right?  Internet addicted? Web sites belonging to all? Well it occurred to me, was Natalee's email address found in any of Joran possessions? Her last day on the island and an attraction with a local, surely email addresses would have been exchanged if everything was on the up & up, don't you think? Did Joran have her email address? If not, then something did go down while she was in his company. In my opinion I think that they would have most likely exchanged cell phone numbers as well. Has this been addressed?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: momto5 on June 26, 2005, 11:53:31 AM
Quote from: "Curiosity"
Quote from: "spab"
Quote from: "absolut"
Steve got an email in the middle of the night from one of the brothers.



... must have been one helluva an email to wind up in jail over.. :?


What could it possibly have said?


Maybe something like that wonderwoman email......now I'm wondering if that email is true and it was being sent out to start an alibi??? ANyone getting a headache thinking of all the possibilities??


Or it could have said hey if anyone asks can you say you saw us dropping someone in front of the HI? In other words cover their story. That might be why hes being held, not just for an email but for also talking to them about why they need a cover story in the first place.


Title: Re: Word-A-Dau
Post by: dragonfly on June 26, 2005, 11:54:17 AM
Quote from: "Lausa"
Quote from: "iquitos"
steve:  got space in the tattoo reefer?  d.
Iquitos, I never realized there were so many definitions for "reefer" until I got curious about what you mean by "the tattoo reefer".   Reefer, to me, meant one thing, something you smoke.  Now I believe you meant something along these lines?.

refrigerated container
www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/policy/army/fm/55-80/gloss.htm
Refrigerated cargo, whether breakbulk or containerized. Also refers to a ship's capability to handle such cargo, and storage areas, containers, etc., used to store and transport them.
www.sjport.com/english/about/glossary_terms.html

::hits self on side of head -- DUH::


I'm with you Lausa.  In my lifetime I've only known one use for that word.  lol.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: HannieC on June 26, 2005, 11:54:43 AM
Interesting story ....grits


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: DT on June 26, 2005, 11:57:01 AM
The hearing is over, waiting for the judges ruling.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Curiosity on June 26, 2005, 11:57:07 AM
Grits - a foreign corporation doesn't have to mean a foriegn country. I had a corporation filed in another state than the one I live in. It was considered a foreign corporation in the state I live in for that reason.


Title: Re: Weird facts...
Post by: spab on June 26, 2005, 11:57:08 AM
Quote from: "grits"
after lurking here for weeks now, I did some research on this case from a different angle:

Thomas B. Twitty is head of Investment Services for AmSouth Bank

AmSouth Bank while appearing to be a U.S. bank is actually owned by AmSouth Bancorporation and is according to SEC filings a foreign corporation but I cannot find anywhere on the Net what country it is incorporated in

Tom Twitty of Birmingham filed a new corporation in Rhode Island on 10/22/2004 and it is named AmSouth Investment Services.  

AmSouth Bank has been in trouble with SEC for several cases in late 2004 but most interesting for money laundering

from the SEC case Oct 2004:

" WHEREAS, AmSouth and the Bank have consented to the assessment of a civil
money penalty by the Board of Governors in the amount of ten million dollars
($10,000,000) for the Bank's aforementioned violations of law and regulation and
unsafe and unsound practices, and by the U.S. Department of the Treasury's
Financial Crimes Enforcement Network ("FinCEN") for violations of the anti-money
laundering program and suspicious activity reporting requirements of the BSA;"

Also, there was a lawsuit because AIS or AmSouth Investment Services is a seperate corp entity from AmSouth Bank yet this wasn't revealed to customers...

So...could this be disappearance be a kidnapping aimed at Tom Twitty either to keep him quiet or as revenge by some party or parties who lost money yet he didn't as he is still employed by the bank

this is also the same bank where Natalie's fund is set up...

just a thought



... interesting. And certainly cause enough for the FBI to be involved..


Title: Re: Weird facts...
Post by: Herkimer on June 26, 2005, 11:57:38 AM
Quote from: "grits"
after lurking here for weeks now, I did some research on this case from a different angle:

Thomas B. Twitty is head of Investment Services for AmSouth Bank

http://64.233.187.104/search?q=cache:QZS7DgLX3P0J:www.harboradvantage.com/Uploaded%2520Documents/Third%2520Party%2520Articles/Variable%2520Annuity%2520Related/AmSouths%2520sales%2520tactics%2520draw%2520fire%2520in%2520Mississippi%2520-%2520USA%2520Today%2520-%25207-11-04.pdf+%22AmSouth+Bancorporation%22+%2Btwitty&hl=en


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Kkial on June 26, 2005, 11:57:47 AM
Grits

Gee, thanks,,,I bank at AmSouth,,,,  Think Tom is "Jar",,,Jug's brother,,father of the twins,, :roll:


Title: some of the links for the info i posted
Post by: grits on June 26, 2005, 11:57:56 AM
SEC case


http://www.ledger-enquirer.com/mld/ledgerenquirer/5953483.htm

http://sec.edgar-online.com/2004/10/12/0000891836-04-000358/section8.asp\\

http://www.bizjournals.com/birmingham/stories/2003/12/22/daily12.html

http://www.corps.state.ri.us/NEWCORPS/10222004.TXT


Title: Re: Weird facts...
Post by: Lausa on June 26, 2005, 11:58:07 AM
Quote from: "grits"
after lurking here for weeks now, I did some research on this case from a different angle:

Thomas B. Twitty is head of Investment Services for AmSouth Bank



This whole thing is getting too 6 degrees of seperation for me.  AmSouth's my bank and they have moved ever so many long-time Mobilians to posts in other cities.  Now I know why the name Twitty sounded so familiar to me, but I'll ask around to make sure.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: klaasend on June 26, 2005, 11:58:46 AM
The hearing is over???


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: nancy_drew on June 26, 2005, 11:59:06 AM
Quote from: "nancy_drew"
Quote from: "KackyLacky"
Quote from: "spab"
Quote from: "absolut"
Steve got an email in the middle of the night from one of the brothers.



... must have been one helluva an email to wind up in jail over.. :?


What could it possibly have said?


well I am offering this as no confirmation it is for real this is going around, and many of the things it says have panned out so far.
http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/Discussion/viewtopic.php?t=201&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=340


You mean the purported Depak email?  I certainly do doubt Depak sent an email in the middle of the night.  His mother said he stayed up all night  on the computer routinely.  HOWEVER,  I'm not ready to say that's the only reason, or the reason at all...yesterday, an Aruban official mentioned Steve's access to a dingy...so, I'm not ready to make a final assessment yet.  It could be both...or none of the above.


I meant to say "don't doubt"...


Title: Re: Weird facts...
Post by: PoorPaulaNNJ on June 26, 2005, 11:59:46 AM
Quote from: "grits"
after lurking here for weeks now, I did some research on this case from a different angle:

Thomas B. Twitty is head of Investment Services for AmSouth Bank

AmSouth Bank while appearing to be a U.S. bank is actually owned by AmSouth Bancorporation and is according to SEC filings a foreign corporation but I cannot find anywhere on the Net what country it is incorporated in

Tom Twitty of Birmingham filed a new corporation in Rhode Island on 10/22/2004 and it is named AmSouth Investment Services.  

AmSouth Bank has been in trouble with SEC for several cases in late 2004 but most interesting for money laundering

from the SEC case Oct 2004:

" WHEREAS, AmSouth and the Bank have consented to the assessment of a civil
money penalty by the Board of Governors in the amount of ten million dollars
($10,000,000) for the Bank's aforementioned violations of law and regulation and
unsafe and unsound practices, and by the U.S. Department of the Treasury's
Financial Crimes Enforcement Network ("FinCEN") for violations of the anti-money
laundering program and suspicious activity reporting requirements of the BSA;"

Also, there was a lawsuit because AIS or AmSouth Investment Services is a seperate corp entity from AmSouth Bank yet this wasn't revealed to customers...

So...could this be disappearance be a kidnapping aimed at Tom Twitty either to keep him quiet or as revenge by some party or parties who lost money yet he didn't as he is still employed by the bank

this is also the same bank where Natalie's fund is set up...

just a thought


I put those together too, and was scratching my head. I also ran into a brick wall on which country involved. I thought this was very interesting.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: DT on June 26, 2005, 12:00:23 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
The hearing is over???


Yes.


Title: but if an american corporation ...
Post by: grits on June 26, 2005, 12:00:46 PM
why would it be doing business as both

Amsouth Bancorpora

and Amsouth Bancorporati


both of these names were mentioned in different lawsuits against the bank?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: mojo on June 26, 2005, 12:01:09 PM
i found ASO as the trading code for AmSouthBancorp - shows the shareholders etc.


Title: Re: but if an american corporation ...
Post by: PoorPaulaNNJ on June 26, 2005, 12:03:08 PM
Quote from: "grits"
why would it be doing business as both

Amsouth Bancorpora

and Amsouth Bancorporati


both of these names were mentioned in different lawsuits against the bank?


I tried to get a clue from their own website by doing a search for ATM locations as well as branches. Although it said they had 600 total, I couldn't get anything in their search engine for ATMs and Branches beyond 20 in the U.S., mainly in LA. Interesting..


Title: LA
Post by: dl3fan on June 26, 2005, 12:06:08 PM
Poor Paula,

Do you mean LA as in Lower Alabama?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: pinemeadows on June 26, 2005, 12:07:27 PM
Quote from: "arubagirl"
After lunch we're going to pass by the courthouse if there is nothing new.

You guys want pictures?


See if you can get one of Joran in a blue plaid shirt.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: nancy_drew on June 26, 2005, 12:07:39 PM
Why does it say "Monkey Junkie" under several posters names?  Yikes.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Curiosity on June 26, 2005, 12:07:41 PM
According to FOX, Joran's hearing is over (no details yet). But there are still four more hearing to go!!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: dragonfly on June 26, 2005, 12:08:01 PM
Only one hearing over, 4 more to go.  This will be a very long day...


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: DT on June 26, 2005, 12:08:16 PM
Quote from: "nancy_drew"
Why does it say "Monkey Junkie" under several posters names?  Yikes.


I think it is because we have over 500 posts.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Lausa on June 26, 2005, 12:08:53 PM
Quote from: "PoorPaulaNNJ"
.
..Natalie was very active in a ?group? which was for foreign exchange student promotion. And then it was said that maybe her involvement and participation in the group was used against her.



Natalee's involvement was with the American Field Service, AFS.  They have a long and well-deserved good reputation for facilitating student exchanges.  My family hosted a Brasilian student for a year (way back in the late 60's).  The Mobile Chapter isn't very active as far as I can tell and I remember being delighted to see that it must be in Bham.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: DAG on June 26, 2005, 12:08:58 PM
Quote from: "DT"
Quote from: "klaasend"
The hearing is over???


Yes.


I think Joran's hearing is over, that leaves the other 4 before we hear anything.  At least that's my take from what was announced on Fox News.


Title: These are some of the other lawsuits....
Post by: grits on June 26, 2005, 12:09:34 PM
Prosecutors' statement of facts accused AmSouth of failing to file such reports in these other cases:


The Ponzi scheme of Terry Dowdell of Charlottesville, Va., involving more than $120 million. Even after learning of Dowdell's arrest in 2003, the bank failed to file such reports. "Contrary to federal law and regulations, AmSouth determined that public disclosure in the media that law enforcement was investigating Dowdell relieved it of an obligation to file."


Judge Howard Butler of Rockwood, Tenn., committed suicide in the face of allegations he embezzled more than $450,000 from the city of Rockwood's AmSouth account. That account required two signatures for checks to be valid, but the bank had allowed checks to be cashed without such endorsements.

For seven years starting in 1992, Robert Humber, vice president of an Alabama bank, used wire transfers from an account to put more than $18 million into a personal account at AmSouth, which failed to flag that activity as suspicious.


An AmSouth Investment Services employee allegedly committed fraud by "forging customer signatures on numerous documents." AmSouth only reported the employee's misconduct to the National Association of Securities Dealers.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Cynthia L. Eldridge said AmSouth has agreed to hire an outside auditor to examine bank records to determine if any other suspicious activity reports should have been filed. "We do hope this sends a message to banks," she said.
Federal Reserve Board officials have told AmSouth they will restrict expansion by the Birmingham-based bank until it fully complies with requirements to cooperate with them and federal prosecutors.

AmSouth officials said Tuesday in a statement: "These agreements are an important step in the process of putting this matter behind us. AmSouth is committed to full compliance with the provisions of the agreements and to continuing to strengthen its processes."


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: dragonfly on June 26, 2005, 12:09:39 PM
That footage of Steve's mother was sad.  I feel for some of these parents.  Regardless of the extent of the involvement of these guys, they are someone's child too.  Very sad.


Title: Re: Just an idea
Post by: katya on June 26, 2005, 12:09:48 PM
Quote from: "Lausa"
G'morning, all.

I stay up late, I rise early.  I read Monkeys inbetween.  This will go down as "My Summer of the Monkeys" for sure.  Thank heaven school's out.

My concern is the way that a statement/rumor -- previously  disproven -- can continue to come up as if for the first time (and for the poster concerned, it may well be the first time).  Each time someone repeats it, subtle variations get added.  Dispelling a rumor or correcting misinformation can take many more posts.

It reminds me a little of the game "Secret" where one person whispers to the next, and on around the circle, til you get to the end and compare the first message to the final message -- wild and often comic deviation between the two versions, usually.


Is there any way that moderators can have a official rubber stamp with a red ink "NOT!" that could be affixed over these repeats, not so as to obliterate the message, but to alert the long time reader that this is more of the same old, same old.  This may, in computer-land, be an impossible task.  

Moderators, we ask a lot of you.  You always deliver.  We are grateful.  I've visited many forums and this is by far the most consistently respectful, well-spoken. and illuminating one I've found.  That said, I wish you all a good day!


Great post, I agree completely

If topics were broken up into individual threads, it would be much easier to separate the facts from the rumours than having just one fast moving megathread. One on Dutch/Aruban law, timelines, confirmed information about the various people involved and so on. Post links to sources..interviews, websites, pictures. I mean every third page someone asks who Lorenzo is :lol:


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: pinemeadows on June 26, 2005, 12:10:00 PM
Quote from: "DAG"
[
I think Joran's hearing is over, that leaves the other 4 before we hear anything.  At least that's my take from what was announced on Fox News.


So would you say his hearing was rather short...considering?  Or did his start promptly at 8:30??


Title: Re: LA
Post by: PoorPaulaNNJ on June 26, 2005, 12:10:10 PM
Quote from: "dl3fan"
Poor Paula,

Do you mean LA as in Lower Alabama?


No, LA as in Louisiana.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: nancy_drew on June 26, 2005, 12:11:22 PM
Quote from: "DT"
Quote from: "nancy_drew"
Why does it say "Monkey Junkie" under several posters names?  Yikes.


I think it is because we have over 500 posts.


Oh dear, I hate "labels".  Ugrrrrrr.

I just had a sleuth breakfast....

Bacon, organic eggs, toast (with homemade raspberry jam, in honor of JazzyBerry) organic orange juice, and Starbucks French Roast Black.


Title: looks like to me...
Post by: grits on June 26, 2005, 12:11:54 PM
lots of money thrown around...and all of the highest bank officers still have their jobs....just curious...


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: klaasend on June 26, 2005, 12:12:27 PM
Quote from: "pinemeadows"
Quote from: "DAG"
[
I think Joran's hearing is over, that leaves the other 4 before we hear anything.  At least that's my take from what was announced on Fox News.


So would you say his hearing was rather short...considering?  Or did his start promptly at 8:30??

Sounds like the normal amount of time to me, 3-4 hours.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: DAG on June 26, 2005, 12:12:35 PM
Quote from: "pinemeadows"
Quote from: "DAG"
[
I think Joran's hearing is over, that leaves the other 4 before we hear anything.  At least that's my take from what was announced on Fox News.


So would you say his hearing was rather short...considering?  Or did his start promptly at 8:30??


From what I have heard this morning, I think they started about 20 minutes late.  So he was in there, what, about 2 hours????


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: cast on June 26, 2005, 12:12:45 PM
Quote from: "Curiosity"
According to FOX, Joran's hearing is over (no details yet). But there are still four more hearing to go!!


That is Paulus hearing is over, not Jorans.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: katya on June 26, 2005, 12:13:24 PM
Quote from: "PoorPaulaNNJ"
This is from America's Most Wanted, second to the last paragraph at the bottom.
http://www.amw.com/missing_persons/case.cfm?id=32411
According to Natalee's stepmother, Robin Holloway, friends say Natalee was last seen with a local resident who claimed to be a foreign exchange student (AP).

Yesterday, I went to the MSN webspace (sorry, don't have link), and I read a statement along these lines....Natalie was very active in a ?group? which was for foreign exchange student promotion. And then it was said that maybe her involvement and participation in the group was used against her.
Interesting to say the least, especially since John Walsh AMW site says Joran claimed to be a foreign exchange student. Hmmmmmm  
Anyone else see or hear about this?  Has it caused speculation??


I've read this comment as well. My take on it is that if he said that he was referring to going to college in Florida, where he would be an exchange student


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: dragonfly on June 26, 2005, 12:13:33 PM
Quote from: "cast"
Quote from: "Curiosity"
According to FOX, Joran's hearing is over (no details yet). But there are still four more hearing to go!!


That is Paulus hearing is over, not Jorans.


FOX reported that Joran's hearing was over, not Paulus.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Curiosity on June 26, 2005, 12:13:37 PM
Quote from: "cast"
Quote from: "Curiosity"
According to FOX, Joran's hearing is over (no details yet). But there are still four more hearing to go!!


That is Paulus hearing is over, not Jorans.


Thanks for the clarification.....I guess I need to turn the volume up.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: DAG on June 26, 2005, 12:13:55 PM
Quote from: "cast"
Quote from: "Curiosity"
According to FOX, Joran's hearing is over (no details yet). But there are still four more hearing to go!!


That is Paulus hearing is over, not Jorans.


I heard them (on Fox) say Joran also   (??????????)


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: sandraK on June 26, 2005, 12:14:02 PM
Quote from: "pinemeadows"
Quote from: "arubagirl"
After lunch we're going to pass by the courthouse if there is nothing new.

You guys want pictures?


See if you can get one of Joran in a blue plaid shirt.

ArubaGirl ,I have a Chat Pal that Love A Pic of PVdS in Hand Cuffs. :D


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: ~TAZ_MAN~ on June 26, 2005, 12:14:11 PM
Quote from: "nancy_drew"
Quote from: "DT"
Quote from: "nancy_drew"
Why does it say "Monkey Junkie" under several posters names?  Yikes.


I think it is because we have over 500 posts.


Oh dear, I hate "labels".  Ugrrrrrr.

I just had a sleuth breakfast....

Bacon, organic eggs, toast (with homemade raspberry jam, in honor of JazzyBerry) organic orange juice, and Starbucks French Roast Black.


That me me hungry


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: waitingtoknow on June 26, 2005, 12:14:12 PM
Quote from: "nancy_drew"
Why does it say "Monkey Junkie" under several posters names?  Yikes.
Hi Nancy!  I was wondering the same thing...Can't wait to tell my hubby that even though I have been here since 1st post on the new forum....day and night...that I AM NOT a monkey junkie...ha ha...

He asked me yesterday if I could go ONE DAY without going to this site...I told him...NO WAY...I wouldn't even want to attempt!! :lol:


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: nancy_drew on June 26, 2005, 12:14:29 PM
Quote from: "cast"
Quote from: "Curiosity"
According to FOX, Joran's hearing is over (no details yet). But there are still four more hearing to go!!


That is Paulus hearing is over, not Jorans.[/quote

They reported it was Joran's that was over.  They might start with the worst charges first?  Not sure.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Shell on June 26, 2005, 12:14:49 PM
hmmmm...If Joran indeed left Natalie alive/asleep/hysterical on the beach, then I could see him going to school and bragging about his conquest the night before. Is it a fact he did that, or is that a rumor? If he knew she had died and been disposed of/hidden, how could he be so stupid to say he had been with her and had sex with her the night before? That's just plain dumb :roll:


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Another K in Texas on June 26, 2005, 12:16:48 PM
I had tried to explore the mistaken identity thing.  If the twitty twins identified her as a relative, then people would know who she was.  Otherwise she has a different last name entirely.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: dragonfly on June 26, 2005, 12:17:06 PM
Quote from: "Shell"
hmmmm...If Joran indeed left Natalie alive/asleep/hysterical on the beach, then I could see him going to school and bragging about his conquest the night before. Is it a fact he did that, or is that a rumor? If he knew she had died and been disposed of/hidden, how could he be so stupid to say he had been with her and had sex with her the night before? That's just plain dumb :roll:


I think that is all rumor.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: PoorPaulaNNJ on June 26, 2005, 12:17:08 PM
Quote from: "katya"
Quote from: "PoorPaulaNNJ"
This is from America's Most Wanted, second to the last paragraph at the bottom.
http://www.amw.com/missing_persons/case.cfm?id=32411
According to Natalee's stepmother, Robin Holloway, friends say Natalee was last seen with a local resident who claimed to be a foreign exchange student (AP).

Yesterday, I went to the MSN webspace (sorry, don't have link), and I read a statement along these lines....Natalie was very active in a ?group? which was for foreign exchange student promotion. And then it was said that maybe her involvement and participation in the group was used against her.
Interesting to say the least, especially since John Walsh AMW site says Joran claimed to be a foreign exchange student. Hmmmmmm  
Anyone else see or hear about this?  Has it caused speculation??


I've read this comment as well. My take on it is that if he said that he was referring to going to college in Florida, where he would be an exchange student


Good one....The flavour I got was that NH was exceptional in ForeignExchange  Program, and I could totally see her still acting/promoting it in her off time. Would have been a good opening line that she would have jumped at the chance to expand on and help.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: cast on June 26, 2005, 12:17:21 PM
Quote from: "dragonfly"
Quote from: "cast"
Quote from: "Curiosity"
According to FOX, Joran's hearing is over (no details yet). But there are still four more hearing to go!!


That is Paulus hearing is over, not Jorans.


FOX reported that Joran's hearing was over, not Paulus.


According to reports Paulus was to be the first of the 5.  Someone in the media is incorrect, don't know who at this point.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Curiosity on June 26, 2005, 12:18:42 PM
Quote from: "cast"
Quote from: "dragonfly"
Quote from: "cast"
Quote from: "Curiosity"
According to FOX, Joran's hearing is over (no details yet). But there are still four more hearing to go!!


That is Paulus hearing is over, not Jorans.


FOX reported that Joran's hearing was over, not Paulus.


According to reports Paulus was to be the first of the 5.  Someone in the media is incorrect, don't know who at this point.


What are you watching or listening too?? I got my info from FoX.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: dragonfly on June 26, 2005, 12:18:45 PM
Cast, are you telling me that MSM is wrong, confused, or incorrect in some of their reporting?  I just don't believe that!!!   :lol:


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Another K in Texas on June 26, 2005, 12:18:54 PM
also notice that even though I was in the first few to register on the new forums,  I am not a junkie. :lol:

At least not yet. :wink:


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: DAG on June 26, 2005, 12:19:14 PM
Quote from: "cast"
Quote from: "dragonfly"
Quote from: "cast"
Quote from: "Curiosity"
According to FOX, Joran's hearing is over (no details yet). But there are still four more hearing to go!!


That is Paulus hearing is over, not Jorans.


FOX reported that Joran's hearing was over, not Paulus.


According to reports Paulus was to be the first of the 5.  Someone in the media is incorrect, don't know who at this point.


I'm pretty sure it doesn't matter, I don't imagine we will not hear anything until all 5 through anyway.


Title: Also, check out the banks involved in this...hmmm....
Post by: grits on June 26, 2005, 12:19:17 PM
AmSouth fraudsters used different banks, devised more schemes  Printable Format
 

   
 A fraud scheme that began with the use of AmSouth bank accounts morphed into more frauds that involved other banks in Mississippi, Panama and Nicaragua, and ripped off some 97 investors across the United States for more than $24 million, according to federal indictments and law enforcement sources.

In 2002, Louis Hamric and Victor Nance, two Mississippi men, orchestrated the original “Ponzi” scheme involving the issuance of promissory notes held in AmSouth accounts, according to federal court records. A Ponzi scheme is a fraud in which early investors are paid off with money raised from later investors.

But AmSouth, which must forfeit $40 million to the U.S. Justice Department and pay $10 million to the U.S. Financial Crimes Enforcement Network for anti-money laundering failures related to the scheme, was not the only bank used. Federal indictments and law enforcement sources say that a wide number of individuals connected to either Hamric or Nance operated several other frauds that involved other banks.


Title: Re: but if an american corporation ...
Post by: bobntexas on June 26, 2005, 12:19:25 PM
Quote from: "PoorPaulaNNJ"
Quote from: "grits"
why would it be doing business as both

Amsouth Bancorpora

and Amsouth Bancorporati


both of these names were mentioned in different lawsuits against the bank?


I tried to get a clue from their own website by doing a search for ATM locations as well as branches. Although it said they had 600 total, I couldn't get anything in their search engine for ATMs and Branches beyond 20 in the U.S., mainly in LA. Interesting..


They are incorporated in Delaware


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: HannieC on June 26, 2005, 12:20:12 PM
cast wrote:
Quote
According to reports Paulus was to be the first of the 5. Someone in the media is incorrect, don't know who at this point


You could be rigth cast, since paulus his 48 hours is already over the limits with this judge that was to late there.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: cast on June 26, 2005, 12:20:27 PM
Quote from: "dragonfly"
Cast, are you telling me that MSM is wrong, confused, or incorrect in some of their reporting?  I just don't believe that!!!   :lol:


Imagine that!  :lol:


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Louise on June 26, 2005, 12:20:54 PM
alot of businesses incorporate in Delaware.

Interesting because of all the mmoney laundering done in Aruba, sort of a center of moneylaundering.


Title: Re: but if an american corporation ...
Post by: Curiosity on June 26, 2005, 12:21:18 PM
Quote from: "bobntexas"
Quote from: "PoorPaulaNNJ"
Quote from: "grits"
why would it be doing business as both

Amsouth Bancorpora

and Amsouth Bancorporati


both of these names were mentioned in different lawsuits against the bank?


I tried to get a clue from their own website by doing a search for ATM locations as well as branches. Although it said they had 600 total, I couldn't get anything in their search engine for ATMs and Branches beyond 20 in the U.S., mainly in LA. Interesting..


They are incorporated in Delaware


They would be doing business as both to spread liabililty possibly.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: nancy_drew on June 26, 2005, 12:21:58 PM
PLEASE NOTE....

I want to publicly send my sincere apologies to Red.  I truly did not get the joke about Greta and the monkey in the cage.  I may have ruffled his feathers...errrr....primate tail fur.....

Sorry.

I seem to always be doing that.  There's ONE in every crowd.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: mojo on June 26, 2005, 12:22:19 PM
and are a publicly traded company on the NYSE - mr twitty is not even a board member as far as i can tell


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: DAG on June 26, 2005, 12:22:34 PM
Will these suspects go before a judge every 8 days or just until they are actually charged with something?????


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: medleyrelay on June 26, 2005, 12:24:05 PM
It has been stated several times - that Joran was in fact in school on Monday!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Curiosity on June 26, 2005, 12:24:24 PM
Quote from: "DAG"
Will these suspects gor before a judge every 8 days or just until they are actually charged with something?????


Not sure, but isn't this hearing for 30 or 60 days for the original three???


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: cast on June 26, 2005, 12:24:29 PM
Quote from: "DAG"
Will these suspects gor before a judge every 8 days or just until they are actually charged with something?????


I think that I heard that if they are not released after the 8 days they can be held for another 60 days.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: waitingtoknow on June 26, 2005, 12:24:30 PM
Quote from: "DAG"
Will these suspects go before a judge every 8 days or just until they are actually charged with something?????
If I am understanding correctly...they go 8 days 8 days 8 days then 60 days.  So this must be the original 3 suspects' hearing to see if they stay 60 days.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: DT on June 26, 2005, 12:25:01 PM
Quote from: "Shell"
hmmmm...If Joran indeed left Natalie alive/asleep/hysterical on the beach, then I could see him going to school and bragging about his conquest the night before. Is it a fact he did that, or is that a rumor? If he knew she had died and been disposed of/hidden, how could he be so stupid to say he had been with her and had sex with her the night before? That's just plain dumb :roll:


I don't think he ever claimed to have sex with her, at least not in any report I've heard.  His statement to his mother suggests that they walked on the beach and that she asked him to leave.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: nancy_drew on June 26, 2005, 12:25:16 PM
Quote from: "Another K in Texas"
also notice that even though I was in the first few to register on the new forums,  I am not a junkie. :lol:

At least not yet. :wink:


Hey Honey, you're ONE post away! Make it a good one! LOL


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: momto5 on June 26, 2005, 12:25:27 PM
Quote from: "Curiosity"
Quote from: "DAG"
Will these suspects gor before a judge every 8 days or just until they are actually charged with something?????


Not sure, but isn't this hearing for 30 or 60 days for the original three???

Yes I think so. It was reported yesterday I believe that this hearing they decide if they continue keeping the 3 for 60 additional days at which time then they go back again before the judge.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: golden on June 26, 2005, 12:25:35 PM
Does there have to be additional reason to detain at each 8 day hearing?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: coco on June 26, 2005, 12:25:38 PM
taking a break from work (not working very effectively since I keep stopping to catch the latest here!)

They said yesterday that the hearings for Joran, Deepak and Satish are for holding them for one more 8 days - next hearing would hold them for 60 days.

Not sure about SC

For Paulus - it's his first 8 day hearing.

Each stage requires different levels of evidence or reason to hold - so they need very little to hold PVDS for 8 but more to hold Joran for another 8 for example.


Title: Off Topic
Post by: BarStine on June 26, 2005, 12:25:48 PM
Someone let me know when the good all inclusive Aruba packages start to book for around $200 a week.  Yawwwn! We're all a little psychic and I predict This case will only drag on another 100+ days. Hope We should get some detailed info by around the 05' World Series.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: katya on June 26, 2005, 12:25:50 PM
Quote from: "DAG"
Will these suspects gor before a judge every 8 days or just until they are actually charged with something?????


I think they do the 8 day thing for 2 or 3 times, and after that, the are held for longer intervals (30 or 60 days???) between review by the judge. I beleive they can be held for a total of 116 or 126 ??? before charges are brought.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: PoorPaulaNNJ on June 26, 2005, 12:25:56 PM
Darn.....Have to do chores. Yuk.
Have fun in the jungle, monkeys. I'll be back later.
Take care all, and wishes for NH family for return of NH soon.  :?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Curiosity on June 26, 2005, 12:25:57 PM
Quote from: "waitingtoknow"
Quote from: "DAG"
Will these suspects go before a judge every 8 days or just until they are actually charged with something?????
If I am understanding correctly...they go 8days 8 days 8 days then 60 days.


WoW, I imagine there is going to have to be some really good evidence to hold them for that length of time!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: HannieC on June 26, 2005, 12:26:01 PM
DAG wrote:
Quote
Will these suspects gor before a judge every 8 days or just until they are actually charged with something?????


I don`t know excactly, the only thing I know here they can extend with 2x
30 days and the max is 116 days, then the have to charge them or release.


Has nothing to do with evidence that they can hold them, it`s just a legal thing and reasonable suspicion nothing else


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: nancy_drew on June 26, 2005, 12:27:25 PM
Quote from: "coco"
taking a break from work (not working very effectively since I keep stopping to catch the latest here!)

They said yesterday that the hearings for Joran, Deepak and Satish are for holding them for one more 8 days - next hearing would hold them for 60 days.

Not sure about SC

For Paulus - it's his first 8 day hearing.

Each stage requires different levels of evidence or reason to hold - so they need very little to hold PVDS for 8 but more to hold Joran for another 8 for example.


Aren't they all looking at 60 more days, except Paulas?  I could have that wrong...or Fox could have it wrong.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 26, 2005, 12:27:47 PM
Quote from: "DAG"
Will these suspects go before a judge every 8 days or just until they are actually charged with something?????


I heard yesterday I think that if they are detained... it will be another 60 days>> Anyone else hear that??


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Dallas Also on June 26, 2005, 12:27:55 PM
Quote from: "DAG"
Will these suspects go before a judge every 8 days or just until they are actually charged with something?????


For the original 3 guys, when they come back again in 8 days, their next hearing will secure them for 60 more days.

For Steve Croes, I think he has another round or two of 8-day detentions.

For Dad - Paulus Van Der Sloot, this is his first round for an 8-day detention.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: nikkibnurse on June 26, 2005, 12:28:08 PM
Quote from: "nancy_drew"
Quote from: "clevfan1234"
fox reporter just said that one of the brother's emailed steve croes that night, so that must be why he is being held


I'm pretty sure McKinley said that was the "buzz" but nothing is confirmed about that.



So, is steve croes "betty" ? LOL :shock:


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: momto5 on June 26, 2005, 12:28:22 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "DAG"
Will these suspects go before a judge every 8 days or just until they are actually charged with something?????


I heard yesterday I think that if they are detained... it will be another 60 days>> Anyone else hear that??

Yup thats what I heard.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: dragonfly on June 26, 2005, 12:28:47 PM
I think MSM is right in that Satish is the most likely to be released, IF anyone is.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: nancy_drew on June 26, 2005, 12:29:51 PM
Quote from: "nikkibnurse"
Quote from: "nancy_drew"
Quote from: "clevfan1234"
fox reporter just said that one of the brother's emailed steve croes that night, so that must be why he is being held


I'm pretty sure McKinley said that was the "buzz" but nothing is confirmed about that.



So, is steve croes "betty" ? LOL :shock:


THAT was very funny!


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Ting on June 26, 2005, 12:30:04 PM
Well, since the Fitzgerald-Austin Kelly merger, AmSouth Bancorporation and the Aruba Tourism Authority have the same advertising agency  :twisted:


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: DAG on June 26, 2005, 12:30:10 PM
Quote from: "dragonfly"
I think MSM is right in that Satish is the most likely to be released, IF anyone is.


Just a thought, but I think they will all be held due to the media attention this is receiving.  I cannot imagine the backlash they would receive if they release anyone at this time.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: golden on June 26, 2005, 12:30:19 PM
Quote from: "golden"
Does there have to be additional reason to detain at each 8 day hearing?


i think it got lost on the last page. Anybody know?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 26, 2005, 12:30:47 PM
Quote from: "nikkibnurse"
Quote from: "nancy_drew"
Quote from: "clevfan1234"
fox reporter just said that one of the brother's emailed steve croes that night, so that must be why he is being held


I'm pretty sure McKinley said that was the "buzz" but nothing is confirmed about that.



So, is steve croes "betty" ? LOL :shock:


lol Nikki..


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: coco on June 26, 2005, 12:31:28 PM
as I pretend to work but really catch up here ... two things interest me

1- Grits new info on Amsouth - worth remembering as we go along

2- the "fight" or shoving match or whatever between one of Natalee's cousin? and Joran -for two reasons - first it suggests why the Twitty's arrived already het up about the VDS possibly - and the other is the idea that Natalee went willingly with Joran after that happened - and her Aruba WooHoo! almost rings as a bit of defiance perhaps over the "protection" from cousin? the family dynamics there are probably not simple ...


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: dragonfly on June 26, 2005, 12:32:26 PM
Quote from: "DAG"
Quote from: "dragonfly"
I think MSM is right in that Satish is the most likely to be released, IF anyone is.


Just a thought, but I think they will all be held due to the media attention this is receiving.  I cannot imagine the backlash they would receive if they release anyone at this time.


Oh, I agree.  I have my doubts that anyone will be released.  But if anyone is I think it will be Satish.  And he will have to hide from MSM.  What a nightmare.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: waitingtoknow on June 26, 2005, 12:33:35 PM
Quote from: "golden"
Quote from: "golden"
Does there have to be additional reason to detain at each 8 day hearing?


i think it got lost on the last page. Anybody know?
I think it is still suspicion....but after the last 60 days, they have to be charged with a crime or set free.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: momto5 on June 26, 2005, 12:33:48 PM
Quote from: "golden"
Quote from: "golden"
Does there have to be additional reason to detain at each 8 day hearing?


i think it got lost on the last page. Anybody know?

I think they only need reasonable suspicion and can hold them 116 days without charges being made. They said they can hold them while establishing a case. I take that as they stay arrested while they build their case.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: golden on June 26, 2005, 12:33:49 PM
Quote from: "dragonfly"
I think MSM is right in that Satish is the most likely to be released, IF anyone is.


So he would be released for the charges currently pending, but  could he eventually be charged for lying about the security guards?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: coco on June 26, 2005, 12:33:50 PM
If any of them are released, it would be an interesting sign of independence or lack of bowing to pressure by the Aruban authorities.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: arubagirl on June 26, 2005, 12:33:53 PM
kshe, the problem is that she is not obligated to testify whatever her son or husband told her. So there is no reason to pick her up


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Another K in Texas on June 26, 2005, 12:34:04 PM
Does being released mean you are not going to be charged, or can they determine you are a low flight risk, like getting out with a bail posted here?


Title: Re: Weird facts...
Post by: Orangecrush on June 26, 2005, 12:34:53 PM
Quote from: "spab"
Quote from: "grits"
after lurking here for weeks now, I did some research on this case from a different angle:

Thomas B. Twitty is head of Investment Services for AmSouth Bank

AmSouth Bank while appearing to be a U.S. bank is actually owned by AmSouth Bancorporation and is according to SEC filings a foreign corporation but I cannot find anywhere on the Net what country it is incorporated in

Tom Twitty of Birmingham filed a new corporation in Rhode Island on 10/22/2004 and it is named AmSouth Investment Services.  

AmSouth Bank has been in trouble with SEC for several cases in late 2004 but most interesting for money laundering

from the SEC case Oct 2004:

" WHEREAS, AmSouth and the Bank have consented to the assessment of a civil
money penalty by the Board of Governors in the amount of ten million dollars
($10,000,000) for the Bank's aforementioned violations of law and regulation and
unsafe and unsound practices, and by the U.S. Department of the Treasury's
Financial Crimes Enforcement Network ("FinCEN") for violations of the anti-money
laundering program and suspicious activity reporting requirements of the BSA;"

Also, there was a lawsuit because AIS or AmSouth Investment Services is a seperate corp entity from AmSouth Bank yet this wasn't revealed to customers...

So...could this be disappearance be a kidnapping aimed at Tom Twitty either to keep him quiet or as revenge by some party or parties who lost money yet he didn't as he is still employed by the bank

this is also the same bank where Natalie's fund is set up...

just a thought



... interesting. And certainly cause enough for the FBI to be involved..



Very interesting.  I will probably get slammed here, but something about Jug really bothers me.  Note the Dad, Dave, is really deeply worried and grieving.  But Jug seems like he just wants to pin it on someone.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: DT on June 26, 2005, 12:35:33 PM
Quote from: "coco"
as I pretend to work but really catch up here ... two things interest me

1- Grits new info on Amsouth - worth remembering as we go along

2- the "fight" or shoving match or whatever between one of Natalee's cousin? and Joran -for two reasons - first it suggests why the Twitty's arrived already het up about the VDS possibly - and the other is the idea that Natalee went willingly with Joran after that happened - and her Aruba WooHoo! almost rings as a bit of defiance perhaps over the "protection" from cousin? the family dynamics there are probably not simple ...
\

Has it been confirmed that it was her cousin?  I'd like to see the source.  ALso their is no confirmation of the ARuba Woohoo comment to my knowledge.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: momto5 on June 26, 2005, 12:35:52 PM
Quote from: "Another K in Texas"
Does being released mean you are not going to be charged, or can they determine you are a low flight risk, like getting out with a bail posted here?

Interesting, do they even have bail? Havent seen anything said about that at all.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: RB on June 26, 2005, 12:35:54 PM
Folks, I will be locking this thread in about 10 minutes.  Please direct your posts to:
http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/Discussion/viewtopic.php?t=370


Title: Re: Just an idea
Post by: Lausa on June 26, 2005, 12:36:39 PM
Quote from: "katya"
Quote from: "Lausa"
G'morning, all.


My concern is the way that a statement/rumor -- previously  disproven -- can continue to come up as... Each time someone repeats it, subtle variations get added.  Dispelling a rumor or correcting misinformation can take many more posts.///
Is there any way that moderators can have a official rubber stamp with a red ink "NOT!"...


Great post, I agree completely

If topics were broken up into individual threads, it would be much easier to separate the facts from the rumours than having just one fast moving megathread. One on Dutch/Aruban law, timelines, confirmed information about the various people involved and so on. Post links to sources..interviews, websites, pictures. I mean every third page someone asks who Lorenzo is :lol:


Apparently my "NOT" stamp idea isn't feasible or advisable, and I can understand the reasons given.  I get so hooked on this thread I forget to check others, but it's my impression that the moderators really are trying to implement your suggestion.

"I mean every third page someone asks who Lorenzo is :lol"
Yikes, that might be me!  Not really.  But I'm still curious to know more about the fellow and can't find much on him.
LOL


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: coco on June 26, 2005, 12:36:47 PM
I'd be a flight risk just to avoid Geraldo!

isn't there something about needing to provide more evidence or reason to hold at each successive hearing - the impression I got was that they can't just hold you on the original suspicion for 116 days but need to show progress in the case at each step or you walk?


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: HannieC on June 26, 2005, 12:37:41 PM
Bial doesn`t excist in dutch law, an I think they can be charged on purgery as well


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Lausa on June 26, 2005, 12:38:07 PM
Quote from: "Another K in Texas"
also notice that even though I was in the first few to register on the new forums,  I am not a junkie. :lol:

At least not yet. :wink:


You might be able to make Junkie status by the end of the day!


Title: Re: Weird facts...
Post by: waitingtoknow on June 26, 2005, 12:38:54 PM
Quote from: "Orangecrush"
Quote from: "spab"
Quote from: "grits"
after lurking here for weeks now, I did some research on this case from a different angle:

Thomas B. Twitty is head of Investment Services for AmSouth Bank

AmSouth Bank while appearing to be a U.S. bank is actually owned by AmSouth Bancorporation and is according to SEC filings a foreign corporation but I cannot find anywhere on the Net what country it is incorporated in

Tom Twitty of Birmingham filed a new corporation in Rhode Island on 10/22/2004 and it is named AmSouth Investment Services.  

AmSouth Bank has been in trouble with SEC for several cases in late 2004 but most interesting for money laundering

from the SEC case Oct 2004:

" WHEREAS, AmSouth and the Bank have consented to the assessment of a civil
money penalty by the Board of Governors in the amount of ten million dollars
($10,000,000) for the Bank's aforementioned violations of law and regulation and
unsafe and unsound practices, and by the U.S. Department of the Treasury's
Financial Crimes Enforcement Network ("FinCEN") for violations of the anti-money
laundering program and suspicious activity reporting requirements of the BSA;"

Also, there was a lawsuit because AIS or AmSouth Investment Services is a seperate corp entity from AmSouth Bank yet this wasn't revealed to customers...

So...could this be disappearance be a kidnapping aimed at Tom Twitty either to keep him quiet or as revenge by some party or parties who lost money yet he didn't as he is still employed by the bank

this is also the same bank where Natalie's fund is set up...

just a thought



... interesting. And certainly cause enough for the FBI to be involved..



Very interesting.  I will probably get slammed here, but something about Jug really bothers me.  Note the Dad, Dave, is really deeply worried and grieving.  But Jug seems like he just wants to pin it on someone.
To me, he seems like he is the typical southern man...He is PISSED because somebody messed with his family....I view him as having much love for Natalee...some ppl just have different emotions during crisis...whether it be worry, anger, or denial.


Title: Re: Just an idea
Post by: golden on June 26, 2005, 12:38:57 PM
[/quote]"I mean every third page someone asks who Lorenzo is :lol"Yikes, that might be me!  Not really.  But I'm still curious to know more about the fellow and can't find much on him.
LOL[/quote]

There is a Lorenzo thread.


Title: but he is head of investments and was quoted in the case..
Post by: grits on June 26, 2005, 12:39:12 PM
Quote from: "mojo"
and are a publicly traded company on the NYSE - mr twitty is not even a board member as far as i can tell


also there was another case against the bank involving Terry Dowdell who was the guy in the 120 million Ponzi scheme and he was set up as a Bahamian corporation called using a company called Vavasseur

and this was where Twitty was quoted...

Variable Annuities Losses End Broker's Comet-Like Career
AmSouth's sales tactics draw fire in Mississippi
By Elliot Blair Smith, USA TODAY - Monday, July 12, 2004

AmSouth Executive Vice President Thomas Twitty, whose brokerage subsidiary employed Moorehead, said in an interview at company headquarters in Birmingham, Ala., "There is one person who didn't play by the rules. He didn't play by our rules."

By trying to pin blame solely on the broker, however, AmSouth overlooks a history of regulatory reprimands alleging lax supervisory and compliance procedures. Moreover, it stonewalled customers and regulators about its compliance failings in Starkville and at other offices, the records and interviews show.


Just saying Twitty might have some big enemies


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: coco on June 26, 2005, 12:40:54 PM
DT - I think it was confirmed that it was one of the cousins - or the Twitty boys (what is their relationship precisely) either last night by arlee maybe or by that boy who did the interview with Dash and said he had to break up the "fight" (isn't there something on RiehlWorld about that?) or ... hmmmm ... I remember seeing a reference in one of the newspaper articles as well - I'll try to find it when I next take a break from this silly work! Of course, it's hearsay still. As is the Aruba WooHoo comment.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Another K in Texas on June 26, 2005, 12:40:59 PM
If aimed at twitty, the grabbing the twins would make more sense.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: DT on June 26, 2005, 12:42:31 PM
Quote from: "coco"
DT - I think it was confirmed that it was one of the cousins - or the Twitty boys (what is their relationship precisely) either last night by arlee maybe or by that boy who did the interview with Dash and said he had to break up the "fight" (isn't there something on RiehlWorld about that?) or ... hmmmm ... I remember seeing a reference in one of the newspaper articles as well - I'll try to find it when I next take a break from this silly work! Of course, it's hearsay still. As is the Aruba WooHoo comment.


Thanks. As for the aruba woohoo comment I think arlee has suggested that their is no source for it, and that they cant seem to find who reported it.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: BarStine on June 26, 2005, 12:42:37 PM
Quote from: "coco"
as I pretend to work but really catch up here ... two things interest me

1- Grits new info on Amsouth - worth remembering as we go along

2- the "fight" or shoving match or whatever between one of Natalee's cousin? and Joran -for two reasons - first it suggests why the Twitty's arrived already het up about the VDS possibly - and the other is the idea that Natalee went willingly with Joran after that happened - and her Aruba WooHoo! almost rings as a bit of defiance perhaps over the "protection" from cousin? the family dynamics there are probably not simple ...
-----------
------------------------------------------------------------------

There is more to this than her being accosted out of CnC on the last night. There was a sequence of events building up. Theorizing again, but maybe she was sympathetic to him after he was sucker punched or treated bad by the cousins, or maybe he took some bad beats at the Hold Em & Blackjack tables and then there was a reckless abandonment or payback motive behind his abducting her...

FoX spews...Cracks in the case???


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Ting on June 26, 2005, 12:42:55 PM
Speaking of family dynamics, does anyone anticipate that at some point, differences of opinion could arise among the family members over when the family, including Mrs. Beth, should return to Alabama?

Specifically, whether efforts to obtain a confession are successful or not, if the Texas team is unable to locate anything that might offer the family a more robust closure...

Natalee's mother has been in a  horrific situation now for more than a month, and she appears to me to be showing increasing strain.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: HannieC on June 26, 2005, 12:43:31 PM
Still wonder what about that guy who 'supposedly' dissapeard who was on the same plain as natalee. How would they know anyway that a guy was missing? I thougt it was greta who came up with this story. But why ?


Title: Re: Just an idea
Post by: Lausa on June 26, 2005, 12:43:37 PM
Quote from: "golden"

There is a Lorenzo thread.[/quote]

Thanks!  I think I'll scoot on over for a bit.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Kshe78 on June 26, 2005, 12:44:26 PM
Quote from: "waitingtoknow"
Quote from: "DAG"
Will these suspects go before a judge every 8 days or just until they are actually charged with something?????
If I am understanding correctly...they go 8 days 8 days 8 days then 60 days.  So this must be the original 3 suspects' hearing to see if they stay 60 days.


It was my understanding from Fox last night that this was their last 8-day hearing.  The next hearing would be the 60-day hearing, although I could have heard wrong.


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: Rosalie on June 26, 2005, 12:44:54 PM
Quote from: "nancy_drew"
Quote from: "coco"
taking a break from work (not working very effectively since I keep stopping to catch the latest here!)

They said yesterday that the hearings for Joran, Deepak and Satish are for holding them for one more 8 days - next hearing would hold them for 60 days.

Not sure about SC

For Paulus - it's his first 8 day hearing.

Each stage requires different levels of evidence or reason to hold - so they need very little to hold PVDS for 8 but more to hold Joran for another 8 for example.


Aren't they all looking at 60 more days, except Paulas?  I could have that wrong...or Fox could have it wrong.



    Well, we have learned one thing.

Dont get in trouble in Aruba or your vacation can be extended for 3-4 months.


Title: This thread is locked....
Post by: RB on June 26, 2005, 12:46:03 PM
...the new thread can be reached by clicking below:

http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/Discussion/viewtopic.php?t=370


Title: RBN #26 NightCrew Sat/Sun
Post by: coco on June 26, 2005, 12:46:21 PM
Hannie - the missing guy bothers me as well - Greta mentioned it in her "follow every lead and that's what we're doing here" comments about not making assumptions from the arrests but she's said nothing further. Either it was a rumour/false tip or she's working on something and doesn't want to tip the competition.

Didn't another news source mention it in passing as well?