Scared Monkeys Discussion Forum

Natalee Holloway => LCD Archive => Topic started by: klaasend on August 09, 2006, 02:17:45 AM



Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on August 09, 2006, 02:17:45 AM
You all know the rules

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/InHonorofNatalee.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on August 09, 2006, 01:40:53 PM
Did I loose you guys?   :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on August 09, 2006, 01:41:49 PM
like your avatar, blah...nice.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: San on August 09, 2006, 01:43:10 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Did I loose you guys?   :lol:

Nope :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on August 09, 2006, 01:43:24 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Did I loose you guys?   :lol:


You calling us 'loose'???  :P


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Anna on August 09, 2006, 01:43:59 PM
Here is the entire scoop on USAToday.  And with this, I have to go work and lurk. . . . .


quote="nonesuche"]Anna-

What about the windsurfer who vanished from the HI without a trace, or the young boy who vanished in the waters while jet-skiing with that older man? I wish I had kept that information.[/quote]

I have told him of those two other missing Americans but think he will respond that they are not officially listed as murders.   :evil: ONLY as missing.  Yeah, right!  But we know that trick now is how they keep their murder rate deceptively low.

But we will find the two or three more that will put Aruba definitely higher than the U.S. even with all the false classification they do to prevent the truth of the matter from being known.  And they have their all too willing accomplices in the MSM to assist them in preventing people from knowing what really goes on there.

I am also going to send him a little background on one of Aruba's most upstanding citizens, Michael Posner, as well.   :?


Here is the address of the man who wrote the article stating that there had only been one murder in Aruba in the past twenty years for USAToday

travel@davidgrossman.net


Here is his address at the paper.  You put Grossman in the subject line to see that it is directed to him:

travel@usatoday.com <travel@usatoday.com>.

This is a link to an article in USAToday and this Grossman who wrote it says that Aruba has had one murder in the last twenty years. I have already written to him protesting that statement but the horror of it is he made it apparently speaking to a group of travel agents!!

Please write to Mr Grossman if you feel so inclined and request that he correct this horrific disinformation. Here is the article and his email address is at the bottom of the article.

http://tinyurl.com/mg6ju

Justinsmama found this:

This what Grossman at USA Today wrote:

Quote:
Many people say they feel safe when traveling. But our sense of "safe" is often distorted by media coverage (or the lack of it) and distance, according to Tarlow. For example, the disappearance of Natalee Holloway gained worldwide attention and caused a decline in visitors to Aruba, even though it is the safest island in the Caribbean with only one murder reported in the last 20 years.


To report corrections and clarifications, contact Reader Editor Brent Jones at 1-800-872-7073 or e-mail accuracy@usatoday.com


So here we can have all the contact infomation at one place although you can go to the USATODAY website and write to the travel editor who is also the boss of this Grossman who write one murder in the last twenty years in Aruba and tells that to a group of travel agents!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on August 09, 2006, 01:45:39 PM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Did I loose you guys?   :lol:


You calling us 'loose'???  :P


Yes..and I never said I could spell..ha ha ha :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on August 09, 2006, 01:50:00 PM
Has there ever been a conspiracy investigation in Aruba, or in NL?  Guess I should do some research on my own, later.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: blah on August 09, 2006, 01:51:46 PM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
like your avatar, blah...nice.



thanks, Anna gave it to me.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on August 09, 2006, 02:03:40 PM
Hi Monkeys!

I am finally in the office after 2 days of Monster.com training at a Beautiful Hotel in Fort Lauderdale!

It was awesome!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: ldstlou on August 09, 2006, 02:11:27 PM
Quote
Posted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 4:01 pm    Post subject:    

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
holy Cow!! I am gone a few days and I can't believe all the statements that have come out!! Going to cathch up tonight...but real quick...where did these staements come from? I mean who leaked them


??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: msmarple on August 09, 2006, 02:12:41 PM
Folks - I mean Monkeys,

I know Anna and I have been blitzing Mr. Grossman. I think we need to start sending this stuff to the State Dept. I'm working on a better-than-blind contact name there. (No, I don't know Condi or anyone - I have simply requested a name, in an email from the web site.)

Our goal should be to get this place on the Travel Warning list (or whatever it's called). The strategy is that by picking out the crimes in the woodwork (wormwood?) on Aruba, we can disprove the stats the island officially release (or proclaim to the travel industry).

We need our Murders on Aruba thread back. Or start another one. We will need some sort of source if possible for each of the incidents we pull together.

Also. We need for someone to politely request the crime records for Aruba from ALE. Who would be a good person for that? Should it be a "name" - or just an innocent, potential tourist-type person?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: ldstlou on August 09, 2006, 02:14:58 PM
Quote from: "ldstlou"
Quote
Posted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 4:01 pm    Post subject:    

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
holy Cow!! I am gone a few days and I can't believe all the statements that have come out!! Going to cathch up tonight...but real quick...where did these staements come from? I mean who leaked them


??


Klaas...did you already make a map showing where Deepak said he dropped off Joran on this latest statement? I can't picture it?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on August 09, 2006, 02:20:31 PM
Quote from: "ldstlou"
Quote from: "ldstlou"
Quote
Posted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 4:01 pm    Post subject:    

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
holy Cow!! I am gone a few days and I can't believe all the statements that have come out!! Going to cathch up tonight...but real quick...where did these staements come from? I mean who leaked them


??


Klaas...did you already make a map showing where Deepak said he dropped off Joran on this latest statement? I can't picture it?


I'm not sure if I have that..been too busy preparting statements for Red to post.  You have no idea how much work there is that goes into it.  

As far as where they came from and why they are being leaked now that is a question for Red to answer.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: ldstlou on August 09, 2006, 02:23:52 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "ldstlou"
Quote from: "ldstlou"
Quote
Posted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 4:01 pm    Post subject:    

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
holy Cow!! I am gone a few days and I can't believe all the statements that have come out!! Going to cathch up tonight...but real quick...where did these staements come from? I mean who leaked them


??


Klaas...did you already make a map showing where Deepak said he dropped off Joran on this latest statement? I can't picture it?


I'm not sure if I have that..been too busy preparting statements for Red to post.  You have no idea how much work there is that goes into it.  

As far as where they came from and why they are being leaked now that is a question for Red to answer.


Gotcha Sweetie!!  Not really important where they came from...just glad we have them...I just wondered if it was public. knowledge..have a feeling I know where they came from anyway...I take it there are more coming!!?? Looking forward to jumping in tonight to analyze. Thanks for your comments!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: ldstlou on August 09, 2006, 02:24:55 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "ldstlou"
Quote from: "ldstlou"
Quote
Posted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 4:01 pm    Post subject:    

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
holy Cow!! I am gone a few days and I can't believe all the statements that have come out!! Going to cathch up tonight...but real quick...where did these staements come from? I mean who leaked them


??


Klaas...did you already make a map showing where Deepak said he dropped off Joran on this latest statement? I can't picture it?


I'm not sure if I have that..been too busy preparting statements for Red to post.  You have no idea how much work there is that goes into it.  

As far as where they came from and why they are being leaked now that is a question for Red to answer.


Thanks again for all of your hard work Klaas!! You are terrific!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Smish on August 09, 2006, 02:30:23 PM
the big hammer wrote:
van der Straaten

He handles interrogations of jvds, but not other two. He is directly involved w/ sloot throughout questioning, but never kalpoe.

This is another important piece. And something new (at least to me).

RE statement of June 13. As noted by others, van der Straaten signs this document on June 17, and presumably submits it then. This delay is a problem. This is not only strange, but is procedural breach. And in case so important to Aruba, this failure to follow procedure is glaring, and an oversight a seasoned, ranking police officer simply would not make.

Unless...there was a reason to.


Exactly, Hammer. What did van der Straaten have to do from Monday afternoon the 13th until sometime Friday the 17th before signing? Glaring is exactly what it is, imo.
Maybe we need to go back and see exactly what was going on in the so called investigation between june 13th and june 17th?What were they doing in this time period?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on August 09, 2006, 02:32:52 PM
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"
Hi Monkeys!

I am finally in the office after 2 days of Monster.com training at a Beautiful Hotel in Fort Lauderdale!

It was awesome!


Missed ya my sistah!

Welcome Back!


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Smish on August 09, 2006, 02:40:52 PM
Smish wrote:
[So if Joran already told Deepak that he would find a way home that night,why did Deepak wait up to make sure Joran got home?Could Deepak be lying here?Could he have told Joran he WOULD pick him up?
Just not a normal thing for GUYS to do....wait up for a"ok,I'm home"call from another guy friend.


Anna:
Smish,
Yes, I agree that this is just tremendously odd! None of the parents care enough to even know where these kids are or where they have been or how drunk they are and yet these two are oh so tenderly guarding each other to their home safely??

Besides, what would be to worry about since there is no crime at all on One Happy Island, what could possibly go wrong? I don't think I have ever seen such tenderness in two guys for each other in such casual circumstances. Never heard one of my sons calling some guy to say they got home OK. A girl, yes, but never another guy.
*****************************
I agree Anna.Deepak makes this waiting for Joran's call sound like something he is required to do,something he has done about 20 times before,something he was told to do as part of the whole PIMP game plan.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: msmarple on August 09, 2006, 02:48:39 PM
Okay, Monkeys -here's another one from a site called http://www.lostremote.com/archives/005685.html . It's dated August 9, but I can't tell if it's 2005 or 2006. (However, the archives only include 2006.) Apparently it's a blog that critiques TV coverage of news events.

Maybe we have some 'splaing to do to him.

Notice the links at the bottom, which might be useful.

Aruba: Murder by numbers
As Coverage Mania of the Holloway story continues unabated, let's do some math. I know - we got into journalism precisely because we were told there would be no math. But let's do some anyway and answer empirically: Just how dangerous is that vicious, pirate-ridden, uncaring island of Aruba?

BY STEVE SAFRAN
LOST REMOTE MANAGING EDITOR

The population of Aruba is about 72,000 people. A conservative estimate of visitors in a given week is about 13,500. Total people on island at any given time? About 85,500.

Last year in Aruba there were two murders - possibly just one, depending on which stat you believe. We'll go with two anyway. No tourists were killed. That's a murder rate on Aruba of a little over 2 per 100,000, but we’ll call it an even 2. Or look at it this way: The Aruba murder rate is .0002.

Still, you can't go a minute without hearing about Natalee and you're worried. Maybe you're switching your vacation from Aruba to Jamaica. Bring some Kevlar. Murder rate: 32 per 100,000.

You'll be twice as safe in Puerto Rico as you would be in Jamaica. Still, it's eight times more dangerous than Aruba: 16 per 100,000 folks in Puerto Rico are going to meet an untimely end this year (with or without Greta Van Sustern caring).

If you're fine with 10 in 100,000 murders per capita, we can suggest Mexico, Estonia, Belize, the Dominican Republic and maybe Barbados during a bad year. Feel a little more secure in Costa Rica. Of your 100,000 friends, 99,994 won't get capped.

So, stick to the U.S. Virgin Islands. We run it. How bad could it be? Turns out you better leave behind a lot of clues if you're going there: 25 murders per 100,000. That's worse than ANY American city, save for New Orleans where shooting guns into the air is considered good, clean fun. The British Virgin Islands are more polite, but say “cheerio” to 11 per 100,000 chaps.

Screw it, you think, I'll just stay home. Now you're only three times as likely to be killed as if you went to Aruba, with the U.S. murder rate at about 6 per 100,000. The murder rate in New York City, from where Fox News constantly reminds us how dangerous Aruba is, was 7 per 100,000 people in 2002. And if your home is in, let's say, Alabama, up the murder rate to 7.5 per 100,000. Then wonder if one of your congressman will call for a boycott of your own state.

Obviously, there are safer places to vacation than Aruba. Go to Slovenia, Tunisia, Indonesia, Saudi Arabia or Qatar and you're golden. Go to Canada, and you're as safe as you could be. Of course, it's colder than Aruba, but the murder rate is tiny. And it's much less likely your family will be pestered by Nancy Grace. She's from the south. She hates the cold.

I got a certain amount of hate mail regarding my last column on Aruba media insanity. (Ironically, Aruba Today's editor said she loved it.) One eloquent writer asked "Do you have a life?" I think it's pretty obvious the answer is "No, of course not. I work in news." One person asked, simply "What is your point?" Context. That's my point. I am not mocking this tragedy, nor the importance of it to the family. What I am so troubled by is a national media obsession that is making Aruba look as though it is run by the Sopranos. Before we ruin the Aruban economy, which is dependent on tourism, here is a little more context:

Natalee disappeared on May 30, 2005. Also on that date, five U.S. soldiers died in Iraq: Corp. Jeffrey B. Starr died in Ramadi, and SSGT. Casey Crate, Captain Derek Argel, Captain Jeremy Fresques and Major William Downes died in Jalawah.

There are currently 19 kids from Alabama listed as missing at the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children website. (2 are from before 1980, some are indeed "family abductions" or "runaways".)

In South Africa, two young tourists were murdered the day after Natalee went missing.

LaToyia Figueroa, a 24-year-old pregnant woman from South Philadelphia, has been missing since July. She is Black. There has been just about no media coverage (except for stories wondering why there's no media coverage). Contrast that with the non-stop madness surrounding Laci Peterson, a 27-year-old pregnant woman from Modesto, California, who was white.

35,000 children are forced to work as prostitutes just across the sea from Aruba, in Colombia.

It's unlikely you’ll be murdered in Aruba, and it’s even more unlikely the news will care. Of course, there are ways to skew the numbers. It turns out you can geometrically expand the odds of having your story covered if you’re a cute white girl with an articulate mother during a slow news cycle. This should generate a significant spike in ratings numbers; after all, that’s the only stat that really matters.

Sources:

Pan American Health Organization (PAHO), International Comparisons of Criminal Justice Statistics 2001-Home Office Bulletin 12/03 http://www.ascotadvisory.com/News_Bulletin/9961.html

Georgia State U. Department of Criminal Justice Statistical Analysis Bureau: http://www.cjgsu.net/initiatives/HomRates-2004-05-14.htm
Iraq Casualties from Centcom.mil, via Iraq Coalition Casualty Count http://icasualties.org/oif/ Black America Web: http://www.blackamericaweb.com/site.aspx/bawnews/figueroa808
Colombia Journal Online: http://www.colombiajournal.org/colombia111.htm

With assistance (and math help) from: Julia Renfro, Editor in Chief, Aruba Today; RD Sahl, Anchor, NECN: Jeff Gralnick, MSNBC; Tom Melville, Asst. ND, NECN Posted by Steve Safran on 08/16/05 | Link | Comments (21)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: WidgetTheMidget on August 09, 2006, 02:54:00 PM
If Deepak Or Satish Are Guilty JVDS Would Have Rolled Over On Them A

LONG Time Ago .....The Cover-Up Comes From The Sloot Camp Not The

Kalpoe Camp ........The Kalpoes Know What Happened But Are Being

Played As Pawns ........Someone That We All Know, Knows The Routine

Of The PERPS But NO ONE Seems To Be Interested In Acquiring The INFO

By The Way ........

The Weather Is Rainy & The Track Is Sloppy ................

To Jacquie MET FEVER ...................

 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: AZSunny on August 09, 2006, 02:54:52 PM
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"
Hi Monkeys!

I am finally in the office after 2 days of Monster.com training at a Beautiful Hotel in Fort Lauderdale!

It was awesome!


2 days in a beautiful hotel in Fort Lauderdale...what is up with that? :shock:
  I got a power point presentation and two hours on the phone with 50 other people!! :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on August 09, 2006, 02:56:56 PM
Quote from: "WidgetTheMidget"
If Deepak Or Satish Are Guilty JVDS Would Have Rolled Over On Them A

LONG Time Ago .....The Cover-Up Comes From The Sloot Camp Not The

Kalpoe Camp ........The Kalpoes Know What Happened But Are Being

Played As Pawns ........Someone That We All Know, Knows The Routine

Of The PERPS But NO ONE Seems To Be Interested In Acquiring The INFO

By The Way ........

The Weather Is Rainy & The Track Is Sloppy ................

To Jacquie MET FEVER ...................

 8)


Oh yeah, baby....check out in the lounge my post about any sport fan will like it....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: ldstlou on August 09, 2006, 02:57:31 PM
Quote
To my question where the girl was buried then, he answered:
“I think that it was buried then next to the wall of the Fisherman's Hut, for the rest I would not know either.”


Joran is asked where "the girl" is buried then.... his response? "IT" was buried then next to wall of the Fisherman's Hut...Natalee is no longer the girl to Joran...but "IT" as in body or corpse


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: WidgetTheMidget on August 09, 2006, 03:00:44 PM
Tell The JEWS ..................

The Vander Sloots Support The Hezbolah .............

 :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 09, 2006, 03:13:07 PM
Quote from: "WidgetTheMidget"
Tell The JEWS ..................

The Vander Sloots Support The Hezbolah .............

 :roll:



 :shock: ......and the darkside is saying that Jossy pays the 'Hez'!!!....LOL! This is all so totally out of control, unreal.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on August 09, 2006, 03:15:57 PM
Quote from: "ldstlou"
Quote
To my question where the girl was buried then, he answered:
“I think that it was buried then next to the wall of the Fisherman's Hut, for the rest I would not know either.”


Joran is asked where "the girl" is buried then.... his response? "IT" was buried then next to wall of the Fisherman's Hut...Natalee is no longer the girl to Joran...but "IT" as in body or corpse


http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0507/29/ng.01.html

Welcome back, everybody. I`m Nancy Grace. Thank you for being with us. Very quickly, to Natalee`s uncle. Joining us is Paul Reynolds. Paul, I understand that you took it upon yourself to go search the area of the of the Holiday Inn.

REYNOLDS: Actually, I was following the Equusearch people that were doing the ground-penetrating sonar over on the beach just north of the Marriott. And one of the Equusearch personnel that I was speaking to had found something suspicious over -- under some trees adjacent to the north side of the Marriott.

GRACE: Hold on. Hold on, Paul. This is a live shot of what he`s talking about, near the hotels. Go ahead, Paul.

REYNOLDS: We went over there and found a suspicious-looking bag, a small bag, but, you know, had a strong odor about it. We weren`t sure what it was. We were looking around the area. We detected some strange-looking mounds close to that and some strange odors coming in that area.

We contacted the police. They sent some detectives over there, and you know, brought a dog over there to check it out. You know, I`m not sure that we found anything, but you know, it gives us confidence in the responsiveness of the investigation, the intensity. You know, while Dave and Equusearch and all them are over at the landfill, you know, we`re still looking in other places. It`s -- you know, we`re -- it`s a multi-faceted investigation. And it`s this much awareness and intensity that gives us hope.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: KatzHome on August 09, 2006, 03:20:34 PM
Hi 2NJSons_Mom ~ Yeah ~ I meant to have her given name in the post ~ I even used Edith Stein when I searched for her chosen Carmelite name...

But when I highlighted the phrase with the botched up spelling ~ I took too much and deleted Edith Stein too...

When Father Kevin said who's feast day it was that we were celebrating today ~ I didn't know who it was until he said, "Edith Stein" ~ and then I knew why the vestments were red...

Because I know how she died...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: sharon on August 09, 2006, 03:23:49 PM
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"
Hi Monkeys!

I am finally in the office after 2 days of Monster.com training at a Beautiful Hotel in Fort Lauderdale!

It was awesome!


Hi fm!

I know -- we're spoiled, right?

Next week is our wedding anniversary -- and we're probably going to have dinner and spend the night in a resort on Key Biscayne.

Just because we can :D

(it's practically walking distance for us -- definitely biking distance)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on August 09, 2006, 03:23:56 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Here is the entire scoop on USAToday.  And with this, I have to go work and lurk. . . . .


quote="nonesuche"]Anna-

What about the windsurfer who vanished from the HI without a trace, or the young boy who vanished in the waters while jet-skiing with that older man? I wish I had kept that information.


I have told him of those two other missing Americans but think he will respond that they are not officially listed as murders.   :evil: ONLY as missing.  Yeah, right!  But we know that trick now is how they keep their murder rate deceptively low.

But we will find the two or three more that will put Aruba definitely higher than the U.S. even with all the false classification they do to prevent the truth of the matter from being known.  And they have their all too willing accomplices in the MSM to assist them in preventing people from knowing what really goes on there.

I am also going to send him a little background on one of Aruba's most upstanding citizens, Michael Posner, as well.   :?


Here is the address of the man who wrote the article stating that there had only been one murder in Aruba in the past twenty years for USAToday

travel@davidgrossman.net


Here is his address at the paper.  You put Grossman in the subject line to see that it is directed to him:

travel@usatoday.com <travel@usatoday.com>.

This is a link to an article in USAToday and this Grossman who wrote it says that Aruba has had one murder in the last twenty years. I have already written to him protesting that statement but the horror of it is he made it apparently speaking to a group of travel agents!!

Please write to Mr Grossman if you feel so inclined and request that he correct this horrific disinformation. Here is the article and his email address is at the bottom of the article.

http://tinyurl.com/mg6ju

Justinsmama found this:

This what Grossman at USA Today wrote:

Quote:
Many people say they feel safe when traveling. But our sense of "safe" is often distorted by media coverage (or the lack of it) and distance, according to Tarlow. For example, the disappearance of Natalee Holloway gained worldwide attention and caused a decline in visitors to Aruba, even though it is the safest island in the Caribbean with only one murder reported in the last 20 years.


To report corrections and clarifications, contact Reader Editor Brent Jones at 1-800-872-7073 or e-mail accuracy@usatoday.com


So here we can have all the contact infomation at one place although you can go to the USATODAY website and write to the travel editor who is also the boss of this Grossman who write one murder in the last twenty years in Aruba and tells that to a group of travel agents![/quote]

USATODAY proving itself to try and overtake the NYT with its fabrication and obfuscation.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Mere on August 09, 2006, 03:26:13 PM
Good afternoon monkeys.... :D

The weather is about to consume us.....so I will hold my page and see you after prayers and thunderstorms..... :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: robots on August 09, 2006, 03:26:19 PM
KLASS ROCKS  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on August 09, 2006, 03:26:47 PM
Quote from: "Smish"
the big hammer wrote:
van der Straaten

He handles interrogations of jvds, but not other two. He is directly involved w/ sloot throughout questioning, but never kalpoe.

This is another important piece. And something new (at least to me).

RE statement of June 13. As noted by others, van der Straaten signs this document on June 17, and presumably submits it then. This delay is a problem. This is not only strange, but is procedural breach. And in case so important to Aruba, this failure to follow procedure is glaring, and an oversight a seasoned, ranking police officer simply would not make.

Unless...there was a reason to.


Exactly, Hammer. What did van der Straaten have to do from Monday afternoon the 13th until sometime Friday the 17th before signing? Glaring is exactly what it is, imo.
Maybe we need to go back and see exactly what was going on in the so called investigation between june 13th and june 17th?What were they doing in this time period?


Is the time of June 13 consistent w/ the date that SCOOP summoned Beth & Jug to the courthouse, only to prove yet again what a lying poseur she was and what an enabler of evil exists in her micromini brain.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: LilPuma on August 09, 2006, 03:28:03 PM
Quote from: "Smish"
the big hammer wrote:
van der Straaten

He handles interrogations of jvds, but not other two. He is directly involved w/ sloot throughout questioning, but never kalpoe.

This is another important piece. And something new (at least to me).

RE statement of June 13. As noted by others, van der Straaten signs this document on June 17, and presumably submits it then. This delay is a problem. This is not only strange, but is procedural breach. And in case so important to Aruba, this failure to follow procedure is glaring, and an oversight a seasoned, ranking police officer simply would not make.

Unless...there was a reason to.


Exactly, Hammer. What did van der Straaten have to do from Monday afternoon the 13th until sometime Friday the 17th before signing? Glaring is exactly what it is, imo.
Maybe we need to go back and see exactly what was going on in the so called investigation between june 13th and june 17th?What were they doing in this time period?


Hey Smish!  Good to see you!  I'd guess that van der Straaten waited those four days to make sure that no evidence or witnesses came forward that could prove Joran was lying again.  If anything did, Uncle Jan needed time to "eliminate" it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on August 09, 2006, 03:30:24 PM
Quote from: "WidgetTheMidget"
If Deepak Or Satish Are Guilty JVDS Would Have Rolled Over On Them A

LONG Time Ago .....The Cover-Up Comes From The Sloot Camp Not The

Kalpoe Camp ........The Kalpoes Know What Happened But Are Being

Played As Pawns ........Someone That We All Know, Knows The Routine

Of The PERPS But NO ONE Seems To Be Interested In Acquiring The INFO

By The Way ........

The Weather Is Rainy & The Track Is Sloppy ................

To Jacquie MET FEVER ...................

 8)


Absolutely, Widget, that was their job to be  cognizant of Joran's shortcomings all the time and keep him from harm and evil and out of trouble.  They were probably "babysitters" and "enablers of this spawn of Satan, which Paulus and Anita had already discovered was not manageable and they were paying the K2 to babysit him and ensure he stayed out of trouble and when Paulus remanded them to the pool for the NO BODY, NO CRIME conversation, he was probably quick to remind them they were not doing what they were paid to do, after receiving all the free drinks and porno that Joran had shared with them, they run off home and let him get into trouble.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Kimmy53 on August 09, 2006, 03:33:17 PM
Msmarples:  thanks for that article (even though it did raise my BP)

In my opinion, they are way off base - Did we EVER say that murders/crimes  Don't happen in the US? NO  Did we ever say that murders/crimes don't happen in New York, Alabama, or any city in the US? NO

The POINT is.... If God forbid, you ARE the victim of a crime, Will Justice be served?  Will you be treated with respect and will the Law Enforcement of the said Country TRY to solve the crime?  Will there be an investigation?  Will police protect and serve?  Will the Law Enforcement care whether justice is served?  If you are in Aruba - NO  They will first ask you how much money you have - then after they finish their cereal, they will begin a smear campaign against the victim, you and anyone who asks any questions.  They will intimidate any witnesses and destroy evidence.  That's just the tip of the iceburg.  I'm too mad to go on...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on August 09, 2006, 03:33:22 PM
Quote from: "WidgetTheMidget"
Tell The JEWS ..................

The Vander Sloots Support The Hezbolah .............

 :roll:


I am not sure that would have to be fabricated. :wink: Where do all the drugs come from that supports Hizb'Allah and where do they transport and who is their enabler and what role is Venezuela playing in all this and how well known is Paulus in Vz?  What connections do he and Rudy Croes have there?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on August 09, 2006, 03:41:26 PM
NEW FRONT PAGE POST:

DEEPAK JUNE 13, 2005 STATEMENT

www.scaredmonkeys.com

Also a thread for the same:

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=182[/b]


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: SunnyinTX on August 09, 2006, 03:42:21 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Here is the entire scoop on USAToday.  And with this, I have to go work and lurk. . . . .


quote="nonesuche"]Anna-

What about the windsurfer who vanished from the HI without a trace, or the young boy who vanished in the waters while jet-skiing with that older man? I wish I had kept that information.


I have told him of those two other missing Americans but think he will respond that they are not officially listed as murders.   :evil: ONLY as missing.  Yeah, right!  But we know that trick now is how they keep their murder rate deceptively low.

But we will find the two or three more that will put Aruba definitely higher than the U.S. even with all the false classification they do to prevent the truth of the matter from being known.  And they have their all too willing accomplices in the MSM to assist them in preventing people from knowing what really goes on there.

I am also going to send him a little background on one of Aruba's most upstanding citizens, Michael Posner, as well.   :?


Here is the address of the man who wrote the article stating that there had only been one murder in Aruba in the past twenty years for USAToday

travel@davidgrossman.net


Here is his address at the paper.  You put Grossman in the subject line to see that it is directed to him:

travel@usatoday.com <travel@usatoday.com>.

This is a link to an article in USAToday and this Grossman who wrote it says that Aruba has had one murder in the last twenty years. I have already written to him protesting that statement but the horror of it is he made it apparently speaking to a group of travel agents!!

Please write to Mr Grossman if you feel so inclined and request that he correct this horrific disinformation. Here is the article and his email address is at the bottom of the article.

http://tinyurl.com/mg6ju

Justinsmama found this:

This what Grossman at USA Today wrote:

Quote:
Many people say they feel safe when traveling. But our sense of "safe" is often distorted by media coverage (or the lack of it) and distance, according to Tarlow. For example, the disappearance of Natalee Holloway gained worldwide attention and caused a decline in visitors to Aruba, even though it is the safest island in the Caribbean with only one murder reported in the last 20 years.


To report corrections and clarifications, contact Reader Editor Brent Jones at 1-800-872-7073 or e-mail accuracy@usatoday.com


So here we can have all the contact infomation at one place although you can go to the USATODAY website and write to the travel editor who is also the boss of this Grossman who write one murder in the last twenty years in Aruba and tells that to a group of travel agents![/quote]


Anna thank you so much....I have sent emails to each.  and Good Afternoon Monks!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: SunnyinTX on August 09, 2006, 03:43:10 PM
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"
Hi Monkeys!

I am finally in the office after 2 days of Monster.com training at a Beautiful Hotel in Fort Lauderdale!

It was awesome!


Hi FM....missed you!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on August 09, 2006, 03:46:32 PM
DEEPAK - JUNE 13TH STATEMENTS NOW ON FP AND IN FORUM


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: SunnyinTX on August 09, 2006, 03:49:14 PM
Quote from: "WidgetTheMidget"
If Deepak Or Satish Are Guilty JVDS Would Have Rolled Over On Them A

LONG Time Ago .....The Cover-Up Comes From The Sloot Camp Not The

Kalpoe Camp ........The Kalpoes Know What Happened But Are Being

Played As Pawns ........Someone That We All Know, Knows The Routine

Of The PERPS But NO ONE Seems To Be Interested In Acquiring The INFO

By The Way ........

The Weather Is Rainy & The Track Is Sloppy ................

Hi Widget!!  I agree about the cover up coming from the sloots.....how are the girls?  Need pictures :D

To Jacquie MET FEVER ...................

 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: SunnyinTX on August 09, 2006, 03:51:54 PM
Quote from: "Nut44x4"
Quote from: "WidgetTheMidget"
Tell The JEWS ..................

The Vander Sloots Support The Hezbolah .............

 :roll:



 :shock: ......and the darkside is saying that Jossy pays the 'Hez'!!!....LOL! This is all so totally out of control, unreal.


they are off their meds and on the hard stuff :wink:

I got a post from over there where one poster stood up and asked all the 'I know, but I can't tells'...to put up or shut up...ooopppssss there goes that ban button again :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: LilPuma on August 09, 2006, 03:52:04 PM
Quote from: "Kimmy53"
Msmarples:  thanks for that article (even though it did raise my BP)

In my opinion, they are way off base - Did we EVER say that murders/crimes  Don't happen in the US? NO  Did we ever say that murders/crimes don't happen in New York, Alabama, or any city in the US? NO

The POINT is.... If God forbid, you ARE the victim of a crime, Will Justice be served?  Will you be treated with respect and will the Law Enforcement of the said Country TRY to solve the crime?  Will there be an investigation?  Will police protect and serve?  Will the Law Enforcement care whether justice is served?  If you are in Aruba - NO  They will first ask you how much money you have - then after they finish their cereal, they will begin a smear campaign against the victim, you and anyone who asks any questions.  They will intimidate any witnesses and destroy evidence.  That's just the tip of the iceburg.  I'm too mad to go on...


I agree, Kimmy.  No place is completely safe; the issue is Aruba is lying about it's level of crime and they want it to appear they are safer than other places as part of their marketing plan.  The corruption is obvious and it too is being protected.  If the police don't trust other police, how can the tourists?  How can you expect help and/or justice if the police don't want to prosecute certain individuals and the whole country wants to hide their crimes under a veil of lies and accusations against the victims?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: SunnyinTX on August 09, 2006, 03:54:18 PM
Quote from: "MeMere"
Good afternoon monkeys.... :D

The weather is about to consume us.....so I will hold my page and see you after prayers and thunderstorms..... :)


Hi Mere.....see you a bit later...stay safe


Title: Thank you, Blah!
Post by: LilPuma on August 09, 2006, 03:55:42 PM
Thank you, Blah for the kitty avatar.  I saw it and copied it from the locked thread so I couldn't respond there.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: SunnyinTX on August 09, 2006, 03:56:10 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"


Is the time of June 13 consistent w/ the date that SCOOP summoned Beth & Jug to the courthouse, only to prove yet again what a lying poseur she was and what an enabler of evil exists in her micromini brain.


Hey Tyler!!  I love it when you talk lke that...d you do have a way with words!! :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: SunnyinTX on August 09, 2006, 03:57:57 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
DEEPAK - JUNE 13TH STATEMENTS NOW ON FP AND IN FORUM



Thanks Klaas!!  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Kimmy53 on August 09, 2006, 04:02:17 PM
Shout out to my favorite mermaid - well the only one I know - anyhow - HEYYYYYYYY!!!

Thanks klaas  - off to read now!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Anna on August 09, 2006, 04:02:31 PM


O/T

Israel has just launched a massive ground invasion into Lebanon.  Hundreds of tanks seen moving to and across the Lebanese border.
Please pray for peace in the region, a lasting peace that leaves Lebanon free of these terrorists and able to return to the way Lebanon was before the terrorists took over there.

Please pray for each country in the region to be respected and allowed to live in peace .


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on August 09, 2006, 04:05:03 PM
Sunny, how are you?  I figured out long ago this is about murder.  This is not about serving tea to ladies of genteel upbringing nor reading bedtime stories to minor children.  The perpetrator in this situation was a minor and his fairy godmother is a witch, his mother is a controlling pathological enabler, and his father is the gifter of porn to underage children.  In order to combat that, we have to 'TELL IT LIKE IT IS'.  It is time to take the white gloves off and abandon the party manners.  You cannot think like the devil unless you get down in the mud with Scoop.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: SunnyinTX on August 09, 2006, 04:07:10 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
DEEPAK - JUNE 13TH STATEMENTS NOW ON FP AND IN FORUM


What a crock of crap!!  He could remember the color of the MANY drinks the sporter had...but couldn't remember what he said when deepak asked him if he went to school that day!! :roll:  :roll:


Title: Re: Thank you, Blah!
Post by: SunnyinTX on August 09, 2006, 04:08:05 PM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Thank you, Blah for the kitty avatar.  I saw it and copied it from the locked thread so I couldn't respond there.


Hi LilPuma...we haven't met....the avatar is darling...welcome to SM


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: SunnyinTX on August 09, 2006, 04:10:26 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Sunny, how are you?  I figured out long ago this is about murder.  This is not about serving tea to ladies of genteel upbringing nor reading bedtime stories to minor children.  The perpetrator in this situation was a minor and his fairy godmother is a witch, his mother is a controlling pathological enabler, and his father is the gifter of porn to underage children.  In order to combat that, we have to 'TELL IT LIKE IT IS'.  It is time to take the white gloves off and abandon the party manners.  You cannot think like the devil unless you get down in the mud with Scoop.


Hi Tyler...getting better :wink:   that's a nasty thought...get down on old leatherfaces level...uuugghhhhhhh!  But I understand what you are saying.....white gloves OFF!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: sharon on August 09, 2006, 04:10:39 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
DEEPAK - JUNE 13TH STATEMENTS NOW ON FP AND IN FORUM


Thanks Klaas.

I just read it

omigod :shock:



.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: mrs. red on August 09, 2006, 04:16:13 PM
Hey Monkeys....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Kimmy53 on August 09, 2006, 04:18:38 PM
Quote from: "Kimmy53"
Shout out to my favorite mermaid - well the only one I know - anyhow - HEYYYYYYYY!!!
Thanks klaas  - off to read now!


That sure didn't come out like I meant it - it sounds a little smarty pants - mermaid - I really am glad to see ya. :oops:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on August 09, 2006, 04:26:17 PM
Quote from: "AZSunny"
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"
Hi Monkeys!

I am finally in the office after 2 days of Monster.com training at a Beautiful Hotel in Fort Lauderdale!

It was awesome!


2 days in a beautiful hotel in Fort Lauderdale...what is up with that? :shock:
  I got a power point presentation and two hours on the phone with 50 other people!! :wink:


I drove to and from the hotel both days I did not get to stay there but truth be told all Monster was a great host with a lovely breakfast , Lunch and snacks both days!  The training is actually the last on their 14 city tour and day 1 was posting and today was searching.

...and it was all free because of our Monster subscription.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on August 09, 2006, 04:27:44 PM
Hello everyone!!  ;)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: robots on August 09, 2006, 04:32:35 PM
THE SHOES ??????????????????????

what did you do witht he SHOES, JORAN you KILLER  :evil:



http://www.rewardformissingshoes.com


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: mrs. red on August 09, 2006, 04:32:59 PM
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Hello everyone!!  ;)


Hey Third....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on August 09, 2006, 04:35:07 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Hello everyone!!  ;)


Hey Third....


Hey Scarlett!! How you doing this fine Wednesday? (I'd call it by it's nickname, but I don't want to get in trouble again)  ;)

I haven't gotten the chance to read Deepak's additional statements (posted on the FP) yet, but it looks like very interesting reading for sure!!  Have you read them yet?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: msmarple on August 09, 2006, 04:36:38 PM
Re. the blitz on Mr. Grossman (USAToday) - as a result of this, we have 5 murders on Aruba in 2005 that WE KNOW OF. (Sadly, I'm including Natalee in that number.)

For 2006, 3 that we know of ... so far ...

Local population about 72,000? with about 15,000 visitors on any given day - say population 90,000.

Can anyone do the math - 5 in 2005?

Yes, I *know* Natalee is considered only "Missing" - and we know why they disappeared her.

Amy Bradley, too - I don't believe that she was abducted into the sex trade. (That was 1998 or 1999.)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: San on August 09, 2006, 04:39:49 PM
Deepak just confirmed to all of us in this new statement that the interior of his car was done over.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on August 09, 2006, 04:42:19 PM
OK, I gotta go for a few (IT guy needs to access my PC).  I'll be back later...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: mrs. red on August 09, 2006, 04:44:20 PM
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Hello everyone!!  ;)


Hey Third....


Hey Scarlett!! How you doing this fine Wednesday? (I'd call it by it's nickname, but I don't want to get in trouble again)  ;)

I haven't gotten the chance to read Deepak's additional statements (posted on the FP) yet, but it looks like very interesting reading for sure!!  Have you read them yet?


I have read them... I need the time to sit down and what I want to do is kinda work in a differnt direction - put the interviews and statements together to see what's consistent... maybe unravel it that way...
I just haven't had the time yet... ya know??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: San on August 09, 2006, 04:45:22 PM
Notice how Deepak makes sure he mentions he made his phone call from the phone at work when he called Joran at the casino.  He is still going with his phone was out of minutes.

If I was giving a statment I would just say I called Joran at the casiono.  Deepak is giving too much detail.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: San on August 09, 2006, 04:47:30 PM
Who was this neighbor who came out and told Joran to lower the radio.  Was it the monkey next door.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: mrs. red on August 09, 2006, 04:49:50 PM
Quote from: "San"
Who was this neighbor who came out and told Joran to lower the radio.  Was it the monkey next door.


Weren't they on vacation?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: San on August 09, 2006, 04:49:55 PM
Who is John Charles Croes and is he related to the Charles Croes at the cell phone company.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: mrs. red on August 09, 2006, 04:50:14 PM
Dang, I didn't realize how late it is.... gotta run Monkeys!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: San on August 09, 2006, 04:50:31 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "San"
Who was this neighbor who came out and told Joran to lower the radio.  Was it the monkey next door.


Weren't they on vacation?

That's what I remember.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: sharon on August 09, 2006, 04:50:56 PM
"At some given moment in time a tourist who was sitting at Joran's table got angry. The tourist thought that we were looking at the cards of other players and signaling/deciding for Joran when he should play or not."


Didn't Deepak say that he went to casinos to 'make' money.

This would be a way.



.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: robots on August 09, 2006, 04:51:37 PM
Quote from: "sharon"
"At some given moment in time a tourist who was sitting at Joran's table got angry. The tourist thought that we were looking at the cards of other players and signaling/deciding for Joran when he should play or not."


Didn't Deepak say that he went to casinos to 'make' money.

This would be a way.



.


yep, its called CHEATING  :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: robots on August 09, 2006, 04:56:28 PM
JORAN wanted it KNOWN that NATALEE had a bump on her body somewhere

thats why he told K2 to say she FELL

what a PIG, JORAN is  :evil:



"that we did a bit of a road-trip, that he kissed and fingered her, that she fell asleep in the car, that we dropped her off at the Holiday Inn, that she had fallen down, that he had helped her up and that she walked off”.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on August 09, 2006, 04:57:29 PM
Quote from: "San"
Notice how Deepak makes sure he mentions he made his phone call from the phone at work when he called Joran at the casino.  He is still going with his phone was out of minutes.

If I was giving a statment I would just say I called Joran at the casiono.  Deepak is giving too much detail.


He never mentions if the sporter called him.  I would be willing to bet there was a flurry of phoning that day.  Why would he ask Joran if he attended/did not attend school that day?  why would this day be any different?  why did Satish not attend school?  What was so important that day that he did not attend school?  Automotive Enterprises?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on August 09, 2006, 04:59:32 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "San"
Who was this neighbor who came out and told Joran to lower the radio.  Was it the monkey next door.


Weren't they on vacation?

That's what I remember.


Neighbor has probably tried to "vacate their minds" so they do not have to think about what all goes on next door.  I bet they continue shaking their heads and saying "there goes the neighborhood."


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: the big hammer on August 09, 2006, 04:59:38 PM
Kalpoe Car Interior Re-Done

To your question from whom I bought the car, I can say the following. I bought the car from a man called David GROSS. He works at a company called "Carufa". I must tell you that when they installed the sound in my car, they used a lot of glue and seal/sealant under the carpet of the car. They had to remove the carpets to pull new cables through the car. You can verify this at "Automotive Enterprises". The man who installed it is called Osman OSMAN. I don't know if anyone had an accident/car crash with this car prior to it being sold to me.

OK.

San, you seem to think deepak refers to car interior re-do happening AFTER Natalee was in the car.  So sometime between May 31 and June 8 (the day before they are detained).

Maybe so.  Why would deepak bring this up? As we know, this car had a lot of aftermarket sound and video installed.  And this was already in car on May 29.  Deepak says in earlier statements talk about sound turned up, closed windows, put in music, playing dvds (porn) etc.

SO maybe he made an upgrade or exchange -- if so -- why?  He already had too much in the car to start with ---

But it surely does seem as though deepak is trying to explain a "recent" work on the car's interior, an explanation which would only be relevant if the work happened after May 31.

The statements which the three made when they were together in polis car should be reviewed, and I will have to go back and look:  in that statment they talked of this company "Automotive Enterprises" also.

So this Automotive Enterprises gets two mentions (at least) while the 3 are in custody.  And the forensics from Holland come back as chocolate and cleaning fluid, I presume kalpoe car impounded on or about time of arrest (June 9)...

...HHhhhmmm.  This is getting interesting.

I wonder where they dump old (or stained) car floor mats and carpeting in Aruba?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on August 09, 2006, 05:02:44 PM
[/b]HAMMER:  
I wonder where they dump old (or stained) car floor mats and carpeting in Aruba?

Wherever they dump the bodies.  Remember the statement from Deepak, if they find the girl, they are going to find all "that shit."  What shit?  The carpeting and interior of his car?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: tidycat on August 09, 2006, 05:12:46 PM
Just curious if anybody knows how/why these statements were suddenly made available...

tidycat


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on August 09, 2006, 05:13:03 PM
Quote from: "Smish"

Friday the 17th before signing? Glaring is exactly what it is, imo.
Maybe we need to go back and see exactly what was going on in the so called investigation between june 13th and june 17th?What were they doing in this time period?




ABBREVIATED TIMELINE FOR PART OF JUNE


June 3 - Aruban Coastguard searches waters

June 3 – first American News Media crew on island was MSNBC, following the first correspondent to the island from the syndicated show, “a Current Affair.”

June 3 – Reportedly a former policeman follows a KIA sedan with a blonde woman matching Natalee’s description from an ATM location.  After following the car from house to house, the police are called.  The girl is brought to the police station, the Twittys are called in, but the woman turned out to be an American tourist.  Similarly it is later reported that Hubert Tiel follows another woman from house to house, before she leaves by helicopter.

June 4 - Allegro Hotel searched room by room

June 5 - Johns & Jones arrested.
Bloody mattress found on SE end of island
Ladies sunglasses & white security shirt found in Colony area of SE end of island

June 5 – Gerold Dompig reportedly replaced vd Straaten as lead investigator per Oduber’s orders.  Vd Straaten becomes lead investigator again within a few days, allegedly around the 10th.

June 6 – Island-wide search for Natalee Holloway
500 gov't employees show up for
search of SouthEastern tip of island

June 8 - Judge J.S. Kuiperdal remands Johns & Jones in custody for an additional 8 days

June 9 – ~6 – 6:30 AM - J2K arrested on “reasonable suspicion of murder, manslaughter or intentional containment with the dead as consequence”

June 9 - 6:00 PM - International School of Aruba senior graduation @ Wyndham Hotel

June 10 – Natalee’s loved ones rush to the lighthouse area after a police official tells the media that one of the three young men in custody admitted “something bad happened” and was leading police to the scene.

June 10 - Beth stated that her D.N.A. was requested by JANSSEN (BETH gave saliva and blood samples)

June 10 - Late that evening FOX News, AP and CNN reported that Dompig and Edward Croes stated that one of the arrested suspects had confessed, and police were being taken to a crime scene. DOMPIG also stated that one of the persons in custody had stated  "that something bad happened to NATALEE.”  Shortly after that statement became public, a press conference was held in which one senior government official made no reference to the Assistant Commissioner's statement, choosing rather, to say that the authorities were at a critical juncture in the investigations.

June 10 - Beth & Dave told by FBI that Natalee may no longer be alive because the 3 Main Suspects were “beginning to implicate each other, and they were not denying the crime, and they were finger-pointing at each other.”

June 10 - BETH phoned her mother and told her that Natalee was probably no longer alive.

June 10 - This weekend began scaling back of search for Natalee. ALE search teams venturing out only after credible tips & coast guard patrols offshore

June 10 - Oduber addresses Aruba that if something bad happened to Natalee it would be bad for the island long considered one of the safest CARIBBEAN OCEAN nations to visit, whose main industry is tourism.

June 10 – Aru-Bay video of what appears to be the recovery of a body is filmed.  It is later claimed to be that of a 7 year old illegal immigrant from Columbia, although the body is later reported to have been found a year earlier

June 11 - Rudy Croes states twice that one of the boys is talking and a body will be found soon.

June 11 - Oduber says there is blood in Deepak's car

June 11 – The radio stations in Aruba are also reporting that ARUBAN police are heading to recover NATALEE’s remains. First it was lighthouse, then it was Bubali Plas (shallow lake), then it’s Canashito, at the rock quarry.

June 11 –Vivian van der Biezen, spokeswoman for the Attorney General said, “The investigation (is) was at a very crucial point.”

June 11 – Video tape of strange events taking place near the lighthouse were uploaded to the internet.

June 11 – Public announcements regarding confession & body location are officially retracted

June 11 – Aru-Bay video of rock painting is filmed
Aru-Bay video of body recovery is uploaded to internet

June 11 - vd STRAATEN was asked by a DUTCH journalist if he had any hopes for a positive outcome? STRAATEN replied, “You always have to be hopeful, but I don’t believe anymore that we will find Natalee alive.” When asked why not, STRAATEN replied, “Because I know the details of the investigation and you don't!”

June 11 - Curacao criminal judge DICK van den BRINK came to Aruba & remanded J2K to be held for an additional 8 days

June 11 or 12 – Julia Renfro hysterically notifies the Twittys that Natalee had been found dead and moved to the island’s courthouse.  Julia inserts herself to the Twittys’ overcrowded mini-van as they rush to the courthouse where they are met by a throng of television cameras.  The family finds the courthouse locked and apparently empty. Julia claimed her information came from a deputy information office in the justice department, but it was found that no official ever leaked the information.

June 12 - Families asked to stop talking to the press

June 12 - Amalin Flanegin was added as second prosecutor after rumors that she would replace Jannsen

June 12 – An Amigoe article in the Aruban newspaper stated, “The father of one of the boys is a substitute judge. And every impression has to be prevented that the judge that is assigned is friends with the father of the boy.”

June 12 - Aru-Bay video of rock painting is uploaded to Internet

June 13 – Joran reportedly tells ALE that Deepak killed & buried Natalee near the huts.  Joran reportedly also claims that he was dropped at his home at 1:40.

June 13 - “FoxNews” RIVERA reported he just got off the phone with the Justice Minister RUDY CROES, and that CROES said there would a “resolution to the case momentarily.”

June 13 – John & Jones were released. JONES was released after his wife and mother testified that JONES was home sick all day 5-29 and 5-30 and wife was continuously with JONES.

June 13 – The lawyer of suspect ABRAHAM JONES, CHRIS LeJUEZ stated the following:
Two suspects: Joran van der Sloot and Abraham Jones were/are detained in the same cellblock at the police department in Noord.
It is here that a crying suspect, Joran van der Sloot supposedly commented to another suspect, Abraham Jones the following:
He is very preoccupied because he thinks that the other two Surinamese suspects might be lying and blaming him for the disappearance of Natalee Holloway. His new story is that they (with they, I mean the two other suspects) dropped him off at his home, with Natalee Holloway still in the car, further he and Natalee exchanged e-mail address and that was the last time he saw her. He also added that the story that he told the officials was orchestrated at his home, near the pool.

June 13 – a second “Wall of Hope and Prayer” is erected

June 14 – 3 condoms, duct tape, and women’s size 14-16 pink polka-dot or pink floral underwear are found near the Marriott Hotel Beach

June 15 – Search & Seizure of vd Sloot’s red jeep & medium-blue SUV, computers and misc. other physical evidence.  Ben King present during search.  Kalpoes home searched & car impounded

June 17 – Steve Croes arrested

June 17 – Dutch judge Bob Wit rules that Paulus not be allowed visitation with Joran. Wit also barred Carlos (Joran’s attorney) from visting b/c Carlo had visited with security guards during their arrest.  Joran’s family hires Richie Kock and Arjan Debie as attorneys for Joran.  Judge Wit extends remand of J2K

June 18 – Paulus questioned for 5 hours as possible witness

June 18 – Rene Van Heyningen found partially beheaded in a cemetery

June 19 – Judge Wit retains S Croes for an additional 8 days

June 20 – Joran reportedly is on suicide watch

June 21 – J2K transferred to KIA

June 21 – Beth & Greta visit with Paulus & Anita at vdS home for 90 minutes.  Allegedly Anita describes Natalee’s underwear & genitals, as well as provides a graphic description of Joran’s sexual encounter with Natalee.

June 21 – J2K transferred to KIA

June 23 – Paulus vd Sloot is arrested under suspicion of complicity to premeditated murder, complicity to murder and complicity to kidnapping.

June 24 – Police secretly tape conversations of J2K while they are being transported together in police vehicle


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: tidycat on August 09, 2006, 05:14:49 PM
Sunfreak, thanks for that timeline...

tidycat


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on August 09, 2006, 05:16:31 PM
KLAASEN, what is the date of the rush to the courthouse where JR inserts herself into this, after summoning Jug & Beth to let her ride with them to the courthouse.  I have it from a 6/13/05 article, but not sure that is the date of the occurrence.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on August 09, 2006, 05:18:06 PM
So the 13 June 2005 statement as attested to by J VanderStraaten does not match this statement:  

June 13 – The lawyer of suspect ABRAHAM JONES, CHRIS LeJUEZ stated the following:

Two suspects: Joran van der Sloot and Abraham Jones were/are detained in the same cellblock at the police department in Noord.
It is here that a crying suspect, Joran van der Sloot supposedly commented to another suspect, Abraham Jones the following:
He is very preoccupied because he thinks that the other two Surinamese suspects might be lying and blaming him for the disappearance of Natalee Holloway. His new story is that they (with they, I mean the two other suspects) dropped him off at his home, with Natalee Holloway still in the car, further he and Natalee exchanged e-mail address and that was the last time he saw her. He also added that the story that he told the officials was orchestrated at his home, near the pool.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on August 09, 2006, 05:19:05 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
KLAASEN, what is the date of the rush to the courthouse where JR inserts herself into this, after summoning Jug & Beth to let her ride with them to the courthouse.  I have it from a 6/13/05 article, but not sure that is the date of the occurrence.


SUNFREAK, thanks, I neglected to see that.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Frijole on August 09, 2006, 05:20:31 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "San"
Notice how Deepak makes sure he mentions he made his phone call from the phone at work when he called Joran at the casino.  He is still going with his phone was out of minutes.

If I was giving a statment I would just say I called Joran at the casiono.  Deepak is giving too much detail.


He never mentions if the sporter called him.  I would be willing to bet there was a flurry of phoning that day.  Why would he ask Joran if he attended/did not attend school that day?  why would this day be any different?  why did Satish not attend school?  What was so important that day that he did not attend school?  Automotive Enterprises?


Lots of good points here...

Is this the place where Peeps worked?  (poster on SM)
Isn't this the place where the American worker died in the container?
This is getting creepier and creepier

It is so obvious that there was a cover up within law enforcement... between the changing stories by the boys and the changes in their attitute.  Once the body was moved and safe... these little details didn't matter any more.  Problem is.. they had already said them.  And not they are on the world wide web for all to read.

Guys - give it up - it's not going away.  San is right... Deepak you gave too much info... we know your car was worked on to conceal evidence.  Who paid for it you or Paulus or the Tourism Board?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Frijole on August 09, 2006, 05:22:15 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
[/b]HAMMER:  
I wonder where they dump old (or stained) car floor mats and carpeting in Aruba?

Wherever they dump the bodies.  Remember the statement from Deepak, if they find the girl, they are going to find all "that shit."  What shit?  The carpeting and interior of his car?


Joran's shoes, the cup that had traces of date rape drug on it, the video????


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on August 09, 2006, 05:23:42 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
KLAASEN, what is the date of the rush to the courthouse where JR inserts herself into this, after summoning Jug & Beth to let her ride with them to the courthouse.  I have it from a 6/13/05 article, but not sure that is the date of the occurrence.


I believe it was June 13th.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on August 09, 2006, 05:24:20 PM
Hi Sunny MTWS  and Kimmy and Sharon - How Lovely!  Do Enjoy!

(I was at the Marriott Harbor Beach)

Winkies and smoochies!

Later - I am tired!

Gonna go home and read all the statements.........


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Smish on August 09, 2006, 05:25:17 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Smish"
the big hammer wrote:
van der Straaten

He handles interrogations of jvds, but not other two. He is directly involved w/ sloot throughout questioning, but never kalpoe.

This is another important piece. And something new (at least to me).

RE statement of June 13. As noted by others, van der Straaten signs this document on June 17, and presumably submits it then. This delay is a problem. This is not only strange, but is procedural breach. And in case so important to Aruba, this failure to follow procedure is glaring, and an oversight a seasoned, ranking police officer simply would not make.

Unless...there was a reason to.


Exactly, Hammer. What did van der Straaten have to do from Monday afternoon the 13th until sometime Friday the 17th before signing? Glaring is exactly what it is, imo.
Maybe we need to go back and see exactly what was going on in the so called investigation between june 13th and june 17th?What were they doing in this time period?


Is the time of June 13 consistent w/ the date that SCOOP summoned Beth & Jug to the courthouse, only to prove yet again what a lying poseur she was and what an enabler of evil exists in her micromini brain.

LOL on the scoop thing...she aint no scoop anything,she IS a renHO.
I'm not sure of the date that she lead the family on that stupid court house chase as I only heard about that this year.Still haven't found a date on that but it is possible it happened between the 13th and 17th of june 05.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: ala_gunslinger on August 09, 2006, 05:26:22 PM
Hey ya'll!!!

Has this been discussed???

'June 3 – Reportedly a former policeman follows a KIA sedan with a blonde woman matching Natalee’s description from an ATM location. After following the car from house to house, the police are called. The girl is brought to the police station, the Twittys are called in, but the woman turned out to be an American tourist. Similarly it is later reported that Hubert Tiel follows another woman from house to house, before she leaves by helicopter. '


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: KackyLacky on August 09, 2006, 05:26:41 PM
hi ya'll...........

hope all is well with you, all is well here.l

I just wanted to mention this...........I am a BIG fan of the TV show "Big Brother".............it is on CBS.........well last week they had a competion for veto power, and one of the prizes was a trip to aruba.............A dr will kirby won it........apparently from what he said on the show he practices dermatolgy at a "Coast Dermatology"............he gave a shout out to them one night during a "live" show...............I have already emailed, him, the show and Endemol entertainment and CBS............just thought you guys would want to know.........

If this was already brought up, I apologize..........

CYA later :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Smish on August 09, 2006, 05:28:33 PM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Quote from: "Smish"
the big hammer wrote:
van der Straaten

He handles interrogations of jvds, but not other two. He is directly involved w/ sloot throughout questioning, but never kalpoe.

This is another important piece. And something new (at least to me).

RE statement of June 13. As noted by others, van der Straaten signs this document on June 17, and presumably submits it then. This delay is a problem. This is not only strange, but is procedural breach. And in case so important to Aruba, this failure to follow procedure is glaring, and an oversight a seasoned, ranking police officer simply would not make.

Unless...there was a reason to.


Exactly, Hammer. What did van der Straaten have to do from Monday afternoon the 13th until sometime Friday the 17th before signing? Glaring is exactly what it is, imo.
Maybe we need to go back and see exactly what was going on in the so called investigation between june 13th and june 17th?What were they doing in this time period?


Hey Smish!  Good to see you!  I'd guess that van der Straaten waited those four days to make sure that no evidence or witnesses came forward that could prove Joran was lying again.  If anything did, Uncle Jan needed time to "eliminate" it.

HI Sweety!Good to see you here....I knew you were going to snatch up that little kitty icon.
Thats possible but I sense a more sinister reason for waiting those 4 days to sign off on it.I think he may have been waiting till the Kalpoe's stories were"concrete"somewhat to make sure they matched Joran's statements.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Spock on August 09, 2006, 05:28:59 PM
The mention of "automotive enterprises" twice while in custody does seem interesting. I would not be surprised if interior work was done before June 9 and evidence was destroyed.

What bothers me the most, is the complete lack of statements in the files before the arrests of the three suspects on June 9. These would be the false wittness statements by the three that were later retracted and led to the arrest of the security guards. These false statements as witnesses are punishable in any criminal system. I also find it very likely the suspect statements of June 9-June 13 have been likewise cleaned up. Some statements are prepared and signed days after the interrogation. The loss of these statements is clear evidence that the file has been sanitized and a coverup was in progress.

Honestly, these statements, and the lack of statements, make it clear to me that the investigation was derailed from the start from someone within the Justice Ministry.  If no "witness" statements come forward prior to June 9, 2005, I will be sure of it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on August 09, 2006, 05:33:46 PM
Quote from: "Spock"
The mention of "automotive enterprises" twice while in custody does seem interesting. I would not be surprised if interior work was done before June 9 and evidence was destroyed.

What bothers me the most, is the complete lack of statements in the files before the arrests of the three suspects on June 9. These would be the false wittness statements by the three that were later retracted and led to the arrest of the security guards. These false statements as witnesses are punishable in any criminal system. I also find it very likely the suspect statements of June 9-June 13 have been likewise cleaned up. Some statements are prepared and signed days after the interrogation. The loss of these statements is clear evidence that the file has been sanitized and a coverup was in progress.

Honestly, these statements, and the lack of statements, make it clear to me that the investigation was derailed from the start from someone within the Justice Ministry.  If no "witness" statements come forward prior to June 9, 2005, I will be sure of it.


SPOCK, you will get no disagreement here but you like many others must not have been listening to Arlene, when she admonished us that we do not understand their system.  She told us we did not understand it.  She was right, but what she failed to tell us that it is a system dependent on "who you are" whether or not you have a right to a coverup.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Frijole on August 09, 2006, 05:34:11 PM
Quote from: "Spock"
The mention of "automotive enterprises" twice while in custody does seem interesting. I would not be surprised if interior work was done before June 9 and evidence was destroyed.

What bothers me the most, is the complete lack of statements in the files before the arrests of the three suspects on June 9. These would be the false wittness statements by the three that were later retracted and led to the arrest of the security guards. These false statements as witnesses are punishable in any criminal system. I also find it very likely the suspect statements of June 9-June 13 have been likewise cleaned up. Some statements are prepared and signed days after the interrogation. The loss of these statements is clear evidence that the file has been sanitized and a coverup was in progress.

Honestly, these statements, and the lack of statements, make it clear to me that the investigation was derailed from the start from someone within the Justice Ministry.  If no "witness" statements come forward prior to June 9, 2005, I will be sure of it.


You are right on Spock.  Now the question is -- will anyone, anywhere DO anything about it?  I am sure Aruba Law enforcement will NOT...  Holland.... doubtful....

What avenue exists to expose such obvious corruption other than pressure from the media?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Frijole on August 09, 2006, 05:39:10 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Spock"
The mention of "automotive enterprises" twice while in custody does seem interesting. I would not be surprised if interior work was done before June 9 and evidence was destroyed.

What bothers me the most, is the complete lack of statements in the files before the arrests of the three suspects on June 9. These would be the false wittness statements by the three that were later retracted and led to the arrest of the security guards. These false statements as witnesses are punishable in any criminal system. I also find it very likely the suspect statements of June 9-June 13 have been likewise cleaned up. Some statements are prepared and signed days after the interrogation. The loss of these statements is clear evidence that the file has been sanitized and a coverup was in progress.

Honestly, these statements, and the lack of statements, make it clear to me that the investigation was derailed from the start from someone within the Justice Ministry.  If no "witness" statements come forward prior to June 9, 2005, I will be sure of it.


SPOCK, you will get no disagreement here but you like many others must not have been listening to Arlene, when she admonished us that we do not understand their system.  She told us we did not understand it.  She was right, but what she failed to tell us that it is a system dependent on "who you are" whether or not you have a right to a coverup.


And what Arlene's ARROGANT SELF did not understand is that we Americans aren't stupid.  We might not have understood their "system" before but we sure caught on... it's the old "buddy buddy" system.

She taught us well and wouldn't it be ironic if her own nightly briefings on how Aruban Law works is what finally fries these aholes?  (i.e. witnesses cannot lie)  Frankly I don't care if they go to jail for simply lying.. they shouldn't be walking the streets and getting paid money for being arrested.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: ala_gunslinger on August 09, 2006, 05:39:15 PM
Quote from: "Spock"
The mention of "automotive enterprises" twice while in custody does seem interesting. I would not be surprised if interior work was done before June 9 and evidence was destroyed.

What bothers me the most, is the complete lack of statements in the files before the arrests of the three suspects on June 9. These would be the false wittness statements by the three that were later retracted and led to the arrest of the security guards. These false statements as witnesses are punishable in any criminal system. I also find it very likely the suspect statements of June 9-June 13 have been likewise cleaned up. Some statements are prepared and signed days after the interrogation. The loss of these statements is clear evidence that the file has been sanitized and a coverup was in progress.

Honestly, these statements, and the lack of statements, make it clear to me that the investigation was derailed from the start from someone within the Justice Ministry.  If no "witness" statements come forward prior to June 9, 2005, I will be sure of it.


Greetings Spock!

I too have often wondered about automotive enterprizes.

Live long and prosper.  V


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Spock on August 09, 2006, 05:40:40 PM
Main stream media needs to demand an explanation: Do "witness" statements by J2K exist in the case file before June 9, 2005? I am going to be sending out some e-mails to the majors.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: ala_gunslinger on August 09, 2006, 05:44:30 PM
Quote from: "Frijole"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "San"
Notice how Deepak makes sure he mentions he made his phone call from the phone at work when he called Joran at the casino.  He is still going with his phone was out of minutes.

If I was giving a statment I would just say I called Joran at the casiono.  Deepak is giving too much detail.


He never mentions if the sporter called him.  I would be willing to bet there was a flurry of phoning that day.  Why would he ask Joran if he attended/did not attend school that day?  why would this day be any different?  why did Satish not attend school?  What was so important that day that he did not attend school?  Automotive Enterprises?


Lots of good points here...

Is this the place where Peeps worked?  (poster on SM)
Isn't this the place where the American worker died in the container?
This is getting creepier and creepier

It is so obvious that there was a cover up within law enforcement... between the changing stories by the boys and the changes in their attitute.  Once the body was moved and safe... these little details didn't matter any more.  Problem is.. they had already said them.  And not they are on the world wide web for all to read.

Guys - give it up - it's not going away.  San is right... Deepak you gave too much info... we know your car was worked on to conceal evidence.  Who paid for it you or Paulus or the Tourism Board?


Klaas, If I may be so bold (plug for Spock there!), is it possible to see our comprehensive map with the triangle AND the location of where the dude was found in the container?

We may be on to the primary scene!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on August 09, 2006, 05:44:52 PM
Quote from: "Spock"
Main stream media needs to demand an explanation: Do "witness" statements by J2K exist in the case file before June 9, 2005? I am going to be sending out some e-mails to the majors.


Spock, perhaps this would include Greta, Kim G, Bill O'R and Gerald Rivers?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: sharon on August 09, 2006, 05:45:55 PM
Quote from: "Spock"
Main stream media needs to demand an explanation: Do "witness" statements by J2K exist in the case file before June 9, 2005? I am going to be sending out some e-mails to the majors.


Well -- we know one earlier statement does exist for Satish because he says it does.

The statement he gave at Bubali.

I think we would ALL like to see that one.



.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on August 09, 2006, 05:47:51 PM
Quote from: "sharon"
Quote from: "Spock"
Main stream media needs to demand an explanation: Do "witness" statements by J2K exist in the case file before June 9, 2005? I am going to be sending out some e-mails to the majors.


Well -- we know one earlier statement does exist for Satish because he says it does.

The statement he gave at Bubali.

I think we would ALL like to see that one.



.


Do you think in their rush to destroy K1 and Joran's statements, they inadverently destroyed Satish's as well and just played it by ear from that point on.  

Speaking of ears, I would like to see some interpol agent grab Arleen by her big ears and pinch her right before carting her off in an orange jumpsuit.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Frijole on August 09, 2006, 05:52:10 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Spock"
Main stream media needs to demand an explanation: Do "witness" statements by J2K exist in the case file before June 9, 2005? I am going to be sending out some e-mails to the majors.


Spock, perhaps this would include Greta, Kim G, Bill O'R and Gerald Rivers?


The problem with just emailing these guys is that they don't devote any time to putting it together in their OWN minds and aren't up to speed.... I think Geraldo Rivera might give it a shot or if we contacted someone like Mark Furhman so that HE could talk about it on these shows.  

In other words - educate the guest vs. tell the host.  The hosts don't get it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on August 09, 2006, 05:53:52 PM
Gunslinger - I don't think I have Robert Benson's work location on a map.

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/LionsDenVDS5.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on August 09, 2006, 05:54:03 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
KLAASEN, what is the date of the rush to the courthouse where JR inserts herself into this, after summoning Jug & Beth to let her ride with them to the courthouse.  I have it from a 6/13/05 article, but not sure that is the date of the occurrence.


I believe it was June 13th.


June 13, 2005 would have been a Monday.  They walked the gauntlet of press only to find the doors locked.  Would the courthouse be locked on a Monday? I also remember the article said 11 days after Natalee went missing - so that would put it on the 11th or 12th.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: sharon on August 09, 2006, 05:54:14 PM
Quote from: "the big hammer"
Kalpoe Car Interior Re-Done

To your question from whom I bought the car, I can say the following. I bought the car from a man called David GROSS. He works at a company called "Carufa". I must tell you that when they installed the sound in my car, they used a lot of glue and seal/sealant under the carpet of the car. They had to remove the carpets to pull new cables through the car. You can verify this at "Automotive Enterprises". The man who installed it is called Osman OSMAN. I don't know if anyone had an accident/car crash with this car prior to it being sold to me.

OK.

San, you seem to think deepak refers to car interior re-do happening AFTER Natalee was in the car.  So sometime between May 31 and June 8 (the day before they are detained).

Maybe so.  Why would deepak bring this up? As we know, this car had a lot of aftermarket sound and video installed.  And this was already in car on May 29.  Deepak says in earlier statements talk about sound turned up, closed windows, put in music, playing dvds (porn) etc.

(snipped)
 
So this Automotive Enterprises gets two mentions (at least) while the 3 are in custody.  And the forensics from Holland come back as chocolate and cleaning fluid, I presume kalpoe car impounded on or about time of arrest (June 9)...

...HHhhhmmm.  This is getting interesting.

I wonder where they dump old (or stained) car floor mats and carpeting in Aruba?


That's an interesting interpretation San/Hammer. And very possible.

That did not occur to me when I read it.

When I read it and saw Deepak mention 'Automotive Enterprises' my first reaction was "So the sporter DID get to read Deepak's statements :evil: "

I figured that was why Joran mentioned it in the police car. Because he had read Deepak's statement.

But there would still be considerable signifigance to the statement. Very suspicious.

I think you're right San. Why would Deepka talk about what was done to his car when he bought it 2 years previously unless it was covering for something else.


.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Smish on August 09, 2006, 05:57:22 PM
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
Quote from: "Smish"

Friday the 17th before signing? Glaring is exactly what it is, imo.
Maybe we need to go back and see exactly what was going on in the so called investigation between june 13th and june 17th?What were they doing in this time period?




ABBREVIATED TIMELINE FOR PART OF JUNE


June 3 - Aruban Coastguard searches waters

June 3 – first American News Media crew on island was MSNBC, following the first correspondent to the island from the syndicated show, “a Current Affair.”

June 3 – Reportedly a former policeman follows a KIA sedan with a blonde woman matching Natalee’s description from an ATM location.  After following the car from house to house, the police are called.  The girl is brought to the police station, the Twittys are called in, but the woman turned out to be an American tourist.  Similarly it is later reported that Hubert Tiel follows another woman from house to house, before she leaves by helicopter.

June 4 - Allegro Hotel searched room by room

June 5 - Johns & Jones arrested.
Bloody mattress found on SE end of island
Ladies sunglasses & white security shirt found in Colony area of SE end of island

June 5 – Gerold Dompig reportedly replaced vd Straaten as lead investigator per Oduber’s orders.  Vd Straaten becomes lead investigator again within a few days, allegedly around the 10th.

June 6 – Island-wide search for Natalee Holloway
500 gov't employees show up for
search of SouthEastern tip of island

June 8 - Judge J.S. Kuiperdal remands Johns & Jones in custody for an additional 8 days

June 9 – ~6 – 6:30 AM - J2K arrested on “reasonable suspicion of murder, manslaughter or intentional containment with the dead as consequence”

June 9 - 6:00 PM - International School of Aruba senior graduation @ Wyndham Hotel

June 10 – Natalee’s loved ones rush to the lighthouse area after a police official tells the media that one of the three young men in custody admitted “something bad happened” and was leading police to the scene.

June 10 - Beth stated that her D.N.A. was requested by JANSSEN (BETH gave saliva and blood samples)

June 10 - Late that evening FOX News, AP and CNN reported that Dompig and Edward Croes stated that one of the arrested suspects had confessed, and police were being taken to a crime scene. DOMPIG also stated that one of the persons in custody had stated  "that something bad happened to NATALEE.”  Shortly after that statement became public, a press conference was held in which one senior government official made no reference to the Assistant Commissioner's statement, choosing rather, to say that the authorities were at a critical juncture in the investigations.

June 10 - Beth & Dave told by FBI that Natalee may no longer be alive because the 3 Main Suspects were “beginning to implicate each other, and they were not denying the crime, and they were finger-pointing at each other.”

June 10 - BETH phoned her mother and told her that Natalee was probably no longer alive.

June 10 - This weekend began scaling back of search for Natalee. ALE search teams venturing out only after credible tips & coast guard patrols offshore

June 10 - Oduber addresses Aruba that if something bad happened to Natalee it would be bad for the island long considered one of the safest CARIBBEAN OCEAN nations to visit, whose main industry is tourism.

June 10 – Aru-Bay video of what appears to be the recovery of a body is filmed.  It is later claimed to be that of a 7 year old illegal immigrant from Columbia, although the body is later reported to have been found a year earlier

June 11 - Rudy Croes states twice that one of the boys is talking and a body will be found soon.

June 11 - Oduber says there is blood in Deepak's car

June 11 – The radio stations in Aruba are also reporting that ARUBAN police are heading to recover NATALEE’s remains. First it was lighthouse, then it was Bubali Plas (shallow lake), then it’s Canashito, at the rock quarry.

June 11 –Vivian van der Biezen, spokeswoman for the Attorney General said, “The investigation (is) was at a very crucial point.”

June 11 – Video tape of strange events taking place near the lighthouse were uploaded to the internet.

June 11 – Public announcements regarding confession & body location are officially retracted

June 11 – Aru-Bay video of rock painting is filmed
Aru-Bay video of body recovery is uploaded to internet

June 11 - vd STRAATEN was asked by a DUTCH journalist if he had any hopes for a positive outcome? STRAATEN replied, “You always have to be hopeful, but I don’t believe anymore that we will find Natalee alive.” When asked why not, STRAATEN replied, “Because I know the details of the investigation and you don't!”

June 11 - Curacao criminal judge DICK van den BRINK came to Aruba & remanded J2K to be held for an additional 8 days

June 11 or 12 – Julia Renfro hysterically notifies the Twittys that Natalee had been found dead and moved to the island’s courthouse.  Julia inserts herself to the Twittys’ overcrowded mini-van as they rush to the courthouse where they are met by a throng of television cameras.  The family finds the courthouse locked and apparently empty. Julia claimed her information came from a deputy information office in the justice department, but it was found that no official ever leaked the information.

June 12 - Families asked to stop talking to the press

June 12 - Amalin Flanegin was added as second prosecutor after rumors that she would replace Jannsen

June 12 – An Amigoe article in the Aruban newspaper stated, “The father of one of the boys is a substitute judge. And every impression has to be prevented that the judge that is assigned is friends with the father of the boy.”

June 12 - Aru-Bay video of rock painting is uploaded to Internet

June 13 – Joran reportedly tells ALE that Deepak killed & buried Natalee near the huts.  Joran reportedly also claims that he was dropped at his home at 1:40.
June 13 - “FoxNews” RIVERA reported he just got off the phone with the Justice Minister RUDY CROES, and that CROES said there would a “resolution to the case momentarily.”

June 13 – John & Jones were released. JONES was released after his wife and mother testified that JONES was home sick all day 5-29 and 5-30 and wife was continuously with JONES.

June 13 – The lawyer of suspect ABRAHAM JONES, CHRIS LeJUEZ stated the following:
Two suspects: Joran van der Sloot and Abraham Jones were/are detained in the same cellblock at the police department in Noord.
It is here that a crying suspect, Joran van der Sloot supposedly commented to another suspect, Abraham Jones the following:
He is very preoccupied because he thinks that the other two Surinamese suspects might be lying and blaming him for the disappearance of Natalee Holloway. His new story is that they (with they, I mean the two other suspects) dropped him off at his home, with Natalee Holloway still in the car, further he and Natalee exchanged e-mail address and that was the last time he saw her. He also added that the story that he told the officials was orchestrated at his home, near the pool.

June 13 – a second “Wall of Hope and Prayer” is erected

June 14 – 3 condoms, duct tape, and women’s size 14-16 pink polka-dot or pink floral underwear are found near the Marriott Hotel Beach

June 15 – Search & Seizure of vd Sloot’s red jeep & medium-blue SUV, computers and misc. other physical evidence.  Ben King present during search.  Kalpoes home searched & car impounded
June 17 – Steve Croes arrested

June 17 – Dutch judge Bob Wit rules that Paulus not be allowed visitation with Joran. Wit also barred Carlos (Joran’s attorney) from visting b/c Carlo had visited with security guards during their arrest.  Joran’s family hires Richie Kock and Arjan Debie as attorneys for Joran.  Judge Wit extends remand of J2K
June 18 – Paulus questioned for 5 hours as possible witness

June 18 – Rene Van Heyningen found partially beheaded in a cemetery

June 19 – Judge Wit retains S Croes for an additional 8 days

June 20 – Joran reportedly is on suicide watch

June 21 – J2K transferred to KIA

June 21 – Beth & Greta visit with Paulus & Anita at vdS home for 90 minutes.  Allegedly Anita describes Natalee’s underwear & genitals, as well as provides a graphic description of Joran’s sexual encounter with Natalee.

June 21 – J2K transferred to KIA

June 23 – Paulus vd Sloot is arrested under suspicion of complicity to premeditated murder, complicity to murder and complicity to kidnapping.

June 24 – Police secretly tape conversations of J2K while they are being transported together in police vehicle

Thank you SunFreak!
Some interesting stuff going on in those 4 days from the 13th to 17th.
So wasn't Joran or the Kalpoe's homes searched at all when they were arrested on the 10th?
And why take the van der Sloot's cars if Joran didn't drive?They could take the cars to seach but didn't have the right to aquire a search warrant for the whole van der Sloot compound?
:x


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: ala_gunslinger on August 09, 2006, 05:57:40 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Gunslinger - I don't think I have Robert Benson's work location on a map.

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/LionsDenVDS5.jpg)


It would be nice to know (I think..)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: blah on August 09, 2006, 05:58:19 PM
Quote from: "Smish"
the big hammer wrote:
van der Straaten

He handles interrogations of jvds, but not other two. He is directly involved w/ sloot throughout questioning, but never kalpoe.

This is another important piece. And something new (at least to me).

RE statement of June 13. As noted by others, van der Straaten signs this document on June 17, and presumably submits it then. This delay is a problem. This is not only strange, but is procedural breach. And in case so important to Aruba, this failure to follow procedure is glaring, and an oversight a seasoned, ranking police officer simply would not make.

Unless...there was a reason to.


Exactly, Hammer. What did van der Straaten have to do from Monday afternoon the 13th until sometime Friday the 17th before signing? Glaring is exactly what it is, imo.
Maybe we need to go back and see exactly what was going on in the so called investigation between june 13th and june 17th?What were they doing in this time period?


Seems that during this period he was working on his alibi and testing different strategies with Deepak and Satish in the same interrogation room to see what their response/counter attack would be:

Sometime by 6-13, while under arrest, and during a joint interrogation together with Current Suspect DEEPAK KALPOE and Current Suspect SATISH KALPOE in the same police interrogation room, Prime Suspect JORAN VAN DER SLOOT changed his alibi-lies AGAIN, and now claims Current Suspect SATISH KALPOE, Current Suspect DEEPAK KALPOE, and NATALEE took Prime Suspect JORAN VAN DER SLOOT to his home where while sitting in the car outside the home NATALEE and Prime Suspect JORAN VAN DER SLOOT exchanged email addresses and said goodbye (time?), then Prime Suspect JORAN VAN DER SLOOT went into his home and Current Suspect DEEPAK KALPOE and Current Suspect SATISH KALPOE drove NATALEE to the “Holiday Inn.”

When Prime Suspect JORAN VAN DER SLOOT claims these alibi-lies during the joint interrogation, it was reported that Current Suspect DEEPAK KALPOE immediately says, “Why are you lying, Joran?”


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on August 09, 2006, 06:00:25 PM
BLAH

Sometime by 6-13, while under arrest, and during a joint interrogation together with Current Suspect DEEPAK KALPOE and Current Suspect SATISH KALPOE in the same police interrogation room, Prime Suspect JORAN VAN DER SLOOT changed his alibi-lies AGAIN, and now claims Current Suspect SATISH KALPOE, Current Suspect DEEPAK KALPOE, and NATALEE took Prime Suspect JORAN VAN DER SLOOT to his home where while sitting in the car outside the home NATALEE and Prime Suspect JORAN VAN DER SLOOT exchanged email addresses and said goodbye (time?), then Prime Suspect JORAN VAN DER SLOOT went into his home and Current Suspect DEEPAK KALPOE and Current Suspect SATISH KALPOE drove NATALEE to the “Holiday Inn.”

NOTE:  Above I pointed out that this does not match the signed attestation statement of same date, signed by JanVDS on 6/17/06.  Why?  Because they practiced different statements until they got one that would implicate the K2 and exonerate the SPORTER.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on August 09, 2006, 06:01:44 PM
YES!

Two black men were supposed to take the fall for this and when that failed, PVDS thought he had found two slightly dark men to take the fall for his pasty white, fat, drunken spawn.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Smish on August 09, 2006, 06:03:03 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
KLAASEN, what is the date of the rush to the courthouse where JR inserts herself into this, after summoning Jug & Beth to let her ride with them to the courthouse.  I have it from a 6/13/05 article, but not sure that is the date of the occurrence.


I believe it was June 13th.

But wait,When renHO went with the family to the courthouse wasn't this because renHO said they had Nat's body there?If so,then a body was reported twice?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on August 09, 2006, 06:03:49 PM
Gunslinger - If you find the location of where Benson worked I'd be happy to add it to the map.  I do remember we knew once the name of his employment but I can't search for it right now.  If someone remembers and can get the address and can try to place it on a map.

I've been very busy getting the statements ready for posting and haven't had time for much else.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: ala_gunslinger on August 09, 2006, 06:05:07 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Gunslinger - If you find the location of where Benson worked I'd be happy to add it to the map.  I do remember we knew once the name of his employment but I can't search for it right now.  If someone remembers and can get the address and can try to place it on a map.

I've been very busy getting the statements ready for posting and haven't had time for much else.


I understand.  Thank you again for all your hard work.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on August 09, 2006, 06:06:44 PM
June 15 – Search & Seizure of vd Sloot’s red jeep & medium-blue SUV, computers and misc. other physical evidence.  Ben King present during search.  Kalpoes home searched & car impounded.

June 17 – Steve Croes arrested

June 17 – Dutch judge Bob Wit rules that Paulus not be allowed visitation with Joran. Wit also barred Carlos (Joran’s attorney) from visting b/c Carlo had visited with security guards during their arrest.  Joran’s family hires Richie Kock and Arjan Debie as attorneys for Joran.  Judge Wit extends remand of J2K

June 18 – Paulus questioned for 5 hours as possible witness

June 18 – Rene Van Heyningen found partially beheaded in a cemetery

June 19 – Judge Wit retains S Croes for an additional 8 days

June 20 – Joran reportedly is on suicide watch

June 21 – J2K transferred to KIA
[/quote]

Interesting that Rene was beheaded the same day that Paulus was questioned for the first time regarding his involvement in the case a an accessory.  Then 2 days later someone is on suicide watch.  Originally it was thought to be Joran, but then some SM believe it was Satish/

Coincidence about the beheading or part of coverup?  Suicide watch b/c of the recent beheading or the news that they were being remanded for more time?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: blah on August 09, 2006, 06:07:33 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
DEEPAK - JUNE 13TH STATEMENTS NOW ON FP AND IN FORUM


EXCELLENT JOB, THANK YOU FOR RETYPING ALL OF THESE FOR US!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: terryd270 on August 09, 2006, 06:07:48 PM
HI! is there anything on the news tonight about the case?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Appeals on August 09, 2006, 06:07:56 PM
Does anyone else have an "Ah Ha! "  moment when reading the following:

The man who had driven the green Yaris called me to come over to where he was. I went over to him. The man was sitting in the car. The man asked me in Papiamentu whether or not the story we told was true. I said yes to him. During the conversation I had with him I had for one reason or another shot my mouth off and said something about the sporting shoes. The man asked me what I meant by sporting shoes. I then said to him that I was thinking about something unrelated/different

Who is the man?

And there's those damning SHOES again!

And by the way Monkeys, it's nice to be back and to have something worthwhile to discuss.  Somebody pipe me aboard, pleeeese   :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Smish on August 09, 2006, 06:08:34 PM
Quote from: "Frijole"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Spock"
Main stream media needs to demand an explanation: Do "witness" statements by J2K exist in the case file before June 9, 2005? I am going to be sending out some e-mails to the majors.


Spock, perhaps this would include Greta, Kim G, Bill O'R and Gerald Rivers?


The problem with just emailing these guys is that they don't devote any time to putting it together in their OWN minds and aren't up to speed.... I think Geraldo Rivera might give it a shot or if we contacted someone like Mark Furhman so that HE could talk about it on these shows.  

In other words - educate the guest vs. tell the host.  The hosts don't get it.

Maybe John Walsh would get it?


Title: Re: Thank you, Blah!
Post by: blah on August 09, 2006, 06:08:45 PM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Thank you, Blah for the kitty avatar.  I saw it and copied it from the locked thread so I couldn't respond there.


actually, Anna should get the credit for that, she gave you that one and gave me my new one !


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: terryd270 on August 09, 2006, 06:09:02 PM
WOW! I thought I was on the wrong site with all the new names..Its nice to have some new friends..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on August 09, 2006, 06:10:34 PM
Blah - it's not a matter of retyping, it's a matter of putting them all into .jpg format so they can be posted on the front page.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on August 09, 2006, 06:11:26 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Gunslinger - If you find the location of where Benson worked I'd be happy to add it to the map.  I do remember we knew once the name of his employment but I can't search for it right now.  If someone remembers and can get the address and can try to place it on a map.

I've been very busy getting the statements ready for posting and haven't had time for much else.


Robert  Wayne Benson, 56 year old American Harley Davidson mechanic, found locked in a storage container behind the shop in Cura Cabay.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: SunnyinTX on August 09, 2006, 06:12:40 PM
Quote from: "Smish"


Is the time of June 13 consistent w/ the date that SCOOP summoned Beth & Jug to the courthouse, only to prove yet again what a lying poseur she was and what an enabler of evil exists in her micromini brain.

LOL on the scoop thing...she aint no scoop anything,she IS a renHO.[/quote]

hahahah  Smish I knew I was gonna like you!! :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Frijole on August 09, 2006, 06:13:44 PM
Quote from: "ala_gunslinger"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Gunslinger - If you find the location of where Benson worked I'd be happy to add it to the map.  I do remember we knew once the name of his employment but I can't search for it right now.  If someone remembers and can get the address and can try to place it on a map.

I've been very busy getting the statements ready for posting and haven't had time for much else.


I understand.  Thank you again for all your hard work.


GSlinger -

I just searched archives and Benson worked for the Harley Davidson shop... unsure if that is the same as Automotive Enterprises or not.  I have the address for the dealership but the repair place might be at a different site :

Big Twin - official Harley-Davidson Dealership
L.G. Smith Blvd. 124a
P.O. Box 5094
Oranjestad, Aruba

But Automotive Enterprises has been discusssed here on more than one occasions...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Smish on August 09, 2006, 06:14:35 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "Smish"
the big hammer wrote:
van der Straaten

He handles interrogations of jvds, but not other two. He is directly involved w/ sloot throughout questioning, but never kalpoe.

This is another important piece. And something new (at least to me).

RE statement of June 13. As noted by others, van der Straaten signs this document on June 17, and presumably submits it then. This delay is a problem. This is not only strange, but is procedural breach. And in case so important to Aruba, this failure to follow procedure is glaring, and an oversight a seasoned, ranking police officer simply would not make.

Unless...there was a reason to.


Exactly, Hammer. What did van der Straaten have to do from Monday afternoon the 13th until sometime Friday the 17th before signing? Glaring is exactly what it is, imo.
Maybe we need to go back and see exactly what was going on in the so called investigation between june 13th and june 17th?What were they doing in this time period?


Seems that during this period he was working on his alibi and testing different strategies with Deepak and Satish in the same interrogation room to see what their response/counter attack would be:

Sometime by 6-13, while under arrest, and during a joint interrogation together with Current Suspect DEEPAK KALPOE and Current Suspect SATISH KALPOE in the same police interrogation room, Prime Suspect JORAN VAN DER SLOOT changed his alibi-lies AGAIN, and now claims Current Suspect SATISH KALPOE, Current Suspect DEEPAK KALPOE, and NATALEE took Prime Suspect JORAN VAN DER SLOOT to his home where while sitting in the car outside the home NATALEE and Prime Suspect JORAN VAN DER SLOOT exchanged email addresses and said goodbye (time?), then Prime Suspect JORAN VAN DER SLOOT went into his home and Current Suspect DEEPAK KALPOE and Current Suspect SATISH KALPOE drove NATALEE to the “Holiday Inn.”

When Prime Suspect JORAN VAN DER SLOOT claims these alibi-lies during the joint interrogation, it was reported that Current Suspect DEEPAK KALPOE immediately says, “Why are you lying, Joran?”

Hi Blah
VERY interesting...so they interrogated J2K all together.I think you are right,they had to ALL come up with the same story.But I wonder why those stories are STILL different?Deepak says he nor Satish picked Joran up at the beach.Joran now says that they do?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: the big hammer on August 09, 2006, 06:15:36 PM
Automotive Enterprises

From June 29, 2005 Police Car Transcript:

Joran: Who has said about burying? I didn't say anything about burying.
Deepak: That's what you have stated. Stop with that bullshit.
Joran: I have said nothing about burying. The only thing what I can think of, is that you know people that it is the people of automotive enterprises.
Satish: Yeah, yeah,yeah, yeah,yeah,yeah, then I had a flat tire, right? Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah,yeah... I picked you up, right. And then I went back to the beach for her.
Joran: Who has said that?
Satish: You said that.
Joran: I have never said that friend. I have never said that you went back, friend.
Joran: That's your problem. If they find that girl, then they will see that shit.

From deepak June 13, 2005 statement:

To your question whether anyone has has ever thrown up in my car, I can say the following. Nobody has ever thrown up/vomited in my car.

To your question from whom I bought the car, I can say the following. I bought the car from a man called David GROSS. He works at a company called "Carufa". I must tell you that when they installed the sound in my car, they used a lot of glue and seal/sealant under the carpet of the car. They had to remove the carpets to pull new cables through the car. You can verify this at "Automotive Enterprises". The man who installed it is called Osman OSMAN. I don't know if anyone had an accident/car crash with this car prior to it being sold to me.

*************************************************

OK --

This is an interesting side-by-side of Automotive Enterprises mentions.

In the polis car transcript, it's very possible to interpret jvds saying that if they find the girl, they will find that "chit" as being followon to previous mention of Automotive Enterprises which jvds also initiates.

He seems to be saying that he knows the kalpoe car was worked on there, and the "chit" could very well be the carpeting/floor mats pulled from there...

So who is Osman?

And is it true that American mechanic who was found dead stuffed in crate (?) worked at this place: Automotive Enterprises?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Frijole on August 09, 2006, 06:16:30 PM
Quote from: "Appeals"
Does anyone else have an "Ah Ha! "  moment when reading the following:

The man who had driven the green Yaris called me to come over to where he was. I went over to him. The man was sitting in the car. The man asked me in Papiamentu whether or not the story we told was true. I said yes to him. During the conversation I had with him I had for one reason or another shot my mouth off and said something about the sporting shoes. The man asked me what I meant by sporting shoes. I then said to him that I was thinking about something unrelated/different

Who is the man?

And there's those damning SHOES again!

And by the way Monkeys, it's nice to be back and to have something worthwhile to discuss.  Somebody pipe me aboard, pleeeese   :wink:


Why, I think the man was Charles Croes....

someone driving Beth around on first night and speaking Papamiento...

And yes - the shoes are important... WHY would Deepak have brought them up in that conversation... seems weird to me.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Frijole on August 09, 2006, 06:17:13 PM
Quote from: "Smish"
Quote from: "Frijole"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Spock"
Main stream media needs to demand an explanation: Do "witness" statements by J2K exist in the case file before June 9, 2005? I am going to be sending out some e-mails to the majors.


Spock, perhaps this would include Greta, Kim G, Bill O'R and Gerald Rivers?


The problem with just emailing these guys is that they don't devote any time to putting it together in their OWN minds and aren't up to speed.... I think Geraldo Rivera might give it a shot or if we contacted someone like Mark Furhman so that HE could talk about it on these shows.  

In other words - educate the guest vs. tell the host.  The hosts don't get it.

Maybe John Walsh would get it?


A definite yes!   :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: ala_gunslinger on August 09, 2006, 06:17:57 PM
Quote from: "Frijole"
Quote from: "ala_gunslinger"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Gunslinger - If you find the location of where Benson worked I'd be happy to add it to the map.  I do remember we knew once the name of his employment but I can't search for it right now.  If someone remembers and can get the address and can try to place it on a map.

I've been very busy getting the statements ready for posting and haven't had time for much else.


I understand.  Thank you again for all your hard work.


GSlinger -

I just searched archives and Benson worked for the Harley Davidson shop... unsure if that is the same as Automotive Enterprises or not.  I have the address for the dealership but the repair place might be at a different site :

Big Twin - official Harley-Davidson Dealership
L.G. Smith Blvd. 124a
P.O. Box 5094
Oranjestad, Aruba

But Automotive Enterprises has been discusssed here on more than one occasions...


 Thank you Frijole!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Frijole on August 09, 2006, 06:18:12 PM
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Gunslinger - If you find the location of where Benson worked I'd be happy to add it to the map.  I do remember we knew once the name of his employment but I can't search for it right now.  If someone remembers and can get the address and can try to place it on a map.

I've been very busy getting the statements ready for posting and haven't had time for much else.


Robert  Wayne Benson, 56 year old American Harley Davidson mechanic, found locked in a storage container behind the shop in Cura Cabay.


Good going!  Now where the hell is that?  lol


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: blah on August 09, 2006, 06:19:05 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
[/b]HAMMER:  
I wonder where they dump old (or stained) car floor mats and carpeting in Aruba?

Wherever they dump the bodies.  Remember the statement from Deepak, if they find the girl, they are going to find all "that shit."  What shit?  The carpeting and interior of his car?


That garbage dump needs to be completely dug up and every inch searched.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Appeals on August 09, 2006, 06:19:35 PM
The American found locked in the container:

From Diario, 17 November, 2005; Mecanico di Harley Davidson haya morto den container

Another person found dead in Aruba. The body of American born Robert Wayne Benson found in a locked container.

Full translation, Hat Tip: Getagrip

Harley Davidson mechanic found dead in a container

ORANJESTAD (AAN): Yesterday afternoon, a San Nicolas patrol car was sent to Cura Cabay, just behind a company that fixes cars and motorcycles, since a dead person was found in a container.

The person in question is the known mechanic Robert Wayne Benson, born in the U.S., of 58 years of age, resident of Pos Abao, who the day before had disappeared, according to his wife.

” The owner of the business, aware of his disappearance, asked two employees to go take a look at the container, they forced the door of the container which was locked from the inside and when opening it they encountered the lifeless body. ”

Dr. van der Linden confirmed his death, however the cause is still not precisely known. Our deep condolences to his family.


===================End of general information=========

Following are comments of that day for anyone that may want to read all this.


Here are some things that people are saying. Along with a video from a site that is the same one who had the white painted rocks.

November 19th, 2005 at 04:06pm Posted by Scared Monkeys | Crime, Natalee Holloway, Aruba, Travel | 63 comments

If you liked this post, I think you’ll also like these;
Body Believed to be that of Missing Army Specialist Robert Hornbeck found in Hotel
Army Spc. Robert Hornbeck still Missing after weekend in Savannah, GA
Natalee Holloway Investigation, One Year Ago Today. aka, What ever happened to the evidence?
An Email from Robert Buran, father of Erik Buran
Jamie Lynn Drake, 19, has been missing since last Friday June 23
« Previous | Next »

63 Comments »
WOW a locked container .. how with they ever solve that  

Comment by sue | November 19, 2005, 4:40 pm

Arlene Ellis Schipper: Investigation Following Many Leads; Autopsy To Follow

ORANJESTAD (AAN): Aruban spokeswoman Arlene Ellis Schipper today comments on the untimely death of an American expat in Aruba, “Rest assured that once the coroner gets back from vacation, he will do a thorough investigation. We are following numerous leads and as a precaution, we are holding two black security guards in detention. They will be held until such time as we can sort out the facts, and when our prosecuting attorney returns from vacation. Blood samples will be collected as well, and put through our special chocolate and cleaning solution device and then sent to Holland for further analysis”.

Ellis Schipper goes on to explain that it is the belief of the polis that Beth Holloway Twitty was somehow involved and the Aruban Polis Union has refused to investigate further until such time as high school students from the US are brought in for further questioning. “We know that an American has perished. We know that Mountain Brook is in America, ” said Chief of Police Deputy Dompig, “.. and we know that high school students love Harley Motorcycles. Investigation 101 says someone from Mountain Brook should be looked at for this, as Aruba is a peaceful safe place. Come join me at the Hilton on Wednesday evenings for Karaoke!”

Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr…………………..

Comment by Moi | November 19, 2005, 5:25 pm

Waiting for a retraction… I left him alive when I locked the container, that’s the way he wanted it…I can’t believe this is happening to me!

Comment by Frank | November 19, 2005, 5:29 pm

This sounds suspicious to me. I suppose we will never find out what he died of.

Comment by Marci | November 19, 2005, 5:33 pm

My condolences to his family…

Comment by Bluesky | November 19, 2005, 5:48 pm

There is a growing sentiment against all the Americans on the island of Aruba because of the on-going boycott. The situation is getting very dangerous daily. All the American tourists should be advised not to travel to the Aruba island for their own safety until the ALE can end the boycott by reporting all they know about Natalee’s disappearance.

Comment by Druu | November 19, 2005, 5:53 pm

I wonder if this poor man was a Natalee supporter even though he lived on the Island

Comment by Sue | November 19, 2005, 8:45 pm

Let’s see if they can solve this one.

Comment by david r | November 19, 2005, 9:52 pm

I feel sorry for his family.

Comment by Marguerite | November 19, 2005, 10:05 pm

he was so ashamed of the american boycott of aruba, that he locked the padlock on himself and committed suicide.

or elvis told him to do it. or he’s really in cancun with natalee gambling away the millions that beth has stolen.

every body knows beth did it.

all sarcasm aside, i really feel bad for him and his family and wish i thought there would be justice done here, whatever happened.

Comment by dennisintn | November 19, 2005, 10:21 pm

As I stated in June to C. Croes - Psalm82. Aruba will self destruct in the near future and Bluesky - well as the name implies - go meet your maker!

To the real Arubans - you can take over your corrupt gov’t and elect your own gov’t officials. Throw the rich in jail and resolve this tradegy soon. It would only take 6 hrs to accomplish because your Polis are (edit)

Comment by cal | November 19, 2005, 10:27 pm

well about three weeks ago I seen in the Diario a picture of a Aruba laying in the stree dead. About two weeks ago I seen in the Diario a picture of a white man laying on the beach with no shirt on, dead. Now today I see a report in the Diario of a white man found locked in a container dead. Now is this a safe island? Could one of them have known something about what happen to Natalee Holloway?

Comment by s. Hollwoay | November 19, 2005, 10:53 pm

give me a freaking break! I knew Scared Monkeys would use this a post up article and try to make it look like it has to do something with the Natalee case. freaking incredible!

Comment by Gabriel Leo | November 19, 2005, 10:56 pm

GL,

What part in the entire post remotely says that? We are posting a Diario Article like we have done with many Aruban papers.

It is a simple news post. Looks like you are making the suggestion, not us.

Comment by Scared Monkeys | November 19, 2005, 11:07 pm

Druu,
Yes, we were saying all along that Aruba isn’t safe, it wasn’t May 30 and it isn’t now. No, I won’t be going to Aruba and I hope no other Americans go. This article in Diario contradicts Arleen’s statement. She said the boycott was not affecting tourism.

Comment by Marci | November 20, 2005, 12:59 am

News is news… seems your getting awfully edgey about the latest news of your so called “safe island”. I guess I’d be upset too if I was trying to promote the safety of my island and people show up dead and missing.

Aruba should be worrying about tourism. There is no way I would consider going to vacation in Aurba after I seen the way this case was handled.

Comment by dianne | November 20, 2005, 1:04 am

AND THEY SAID NOTHING LIKE THAT EVER HAPPENS IN ARUBA. THAT IS HORRIFIC DEATH THE WAY THAT MAN DIED. AND YOU ARE TELLING ME THESE PEOPLE IN ARUBA ARE CIVIL. I THINK THEY GET VICIOUS WHEN THEY DON’T GET THERE WAY. STRANGE THINGS ARE HAPPENING OVER THERE SICK JUST SICK. LORD HAVE MERCY.

Comment by brenda | November 20, 2005, 1:13 am

Wayne was a well respected, wonderful man that would give you the shirt off his back to help a friend in need. I’m deeply saddened by this horrific tragedy. I will truly miss him.

Michelle

Comment by michelle | November 20, 2005, 1:17 am

There was a boy from Michigan (14 years old I believe) that disappeared in Aruba in February. His mother, him and sister went to Aruba to have calm after the husband/dad died. The news article said their was a 50 something year old man (American) who asked to take the boy Jet Skiing and the boy begged his mom to let him go and the man offered to pay for the jet ski. While out on the water something happened to the boy, he didn’t return and the body has not been found. The story keeps changing from the older man he went with, the mom is wondering if he set it up to kill him or abduct him. But something is not right with the story and the body hasn’t been found. This isn’t the older man that was involved was it? Google Missing Boy Michigan Aruba. And you will find links to the story.

Comment by Jackie | November 20, 2005, 1:52 am

Michigan Teen Missing in Aruba
By Heather Catallo
Web produced by Sarah Morgan
November 14, 2005

For two months 7 Action News has been investigating the disappearance of boy from Brighton.

Now the FBI is getting involved to find out what happened to a young teen on the island of Aruba.

Police in Aruba say Max Devrees’ disappearance was just an accident. But Action News has learned the FBI is now stepping in to investigate this case because it might be much more than just an innocent mystery in Aruba.

The inviting ocean and sandy beaches of Aruba have proven dangerous for an American more than once recently.

The world knows about Natalee Holloway, the Alabama teenager who disappeared in southern Aruba.

But another young teenager, from Brighton, Michigan also vanished without a trace in Aruba. His name was Max Devrees.

Yvonne Devries took 14-year-old Max and his younger sister to Aruba in may of 2004. She wanted them to spend some healing family time together following the death of her husband.

“I want to find out if this was truly an accident. Was my son set up to be taken in Aruba? Was I followed and stalked and my son purposely targeted? We went there as basically a memorial service, privately for the family, in honor of their dad,” said Yvonne.

At their hotel the Devrees family ended up hanging out with another hotel guest. He was a fellow American, 56-year-old David Stacey Sr.

Stacey offered to pay for Max to rent a wave runner so they could go out on the water together.

“Max was jumping up and down, really excited, let me go, let me go. And I did,” said Yvonne.

That was the last time she would see her son.

“They didn’t come back in 45 minutes. They didn’t come back in an hour. Pretty much immediately, I had that sinking feeling something was wrong,” explained Yvonne.

The police launched a massive ocean search. After several hours they rescued Stacey about four miles off the coast, but Max was never found.

According to Aruba police reports obtained by Action News, Stacey told police Max’s wave runner stopped working. He said he tried to tow Max’s watercraft, but that stranded both machines.

Back on land Stacey told police Max somehow slipped away. But Stacey’s story seems to change, depending on who he spoke to.

In one police interview, Stacey said “Max started swimming towards shore.”

But Yvonne said he told her something entirely different, “He said, ‘I heard a thump and Max was floating away.’ I said, ‘was he hurt?’ ‘Well, I don’t know, that was our said agreement between the two of us, to save our energy.’ ‘What do you mean an agreement?’ If it was your son, floating away, you would yell out to him, are you okay?”

But in his first interview with police, Stacey told detectives he didn’t have an agreement with Max.

Stacey also told police, “I do not remember if I called [out to] Max. I don’t think I did.”

But in another statement 2 days later, Stacey said, “I called out to [Max], but he did not answer.”

Corey Williams is a Michigan detective who is helping Yvonne learn the truth about what happened to Max.

He said the statements to the police don’t add up, “The minute I started reading, I started seeing what I would describe as glaring inconsistencies.”

Williams is also concerned about how quickly the Aruban police closed out the case without digging further into Stacey’s background.

“It appears to me that there could possibly be foul play involved. It definitely appears to me that there needs to be more investigation done,” said Williams.

In the Aruban police reports, David Stacey Sr. told detectives that he did not kill or do anything to hurt Max.

As for the Aruba police, they have not returned our phone calls to tell us why they closed their case so quickly.

Yvonne wants someone to find out how and why her son vanished, “Whatever you hold dear to you, just make sure you really realize what you do have, make sure you treasure it everyday, because when you wake up, you don’t know if that’s going to be your last day with them.” http://www.wxyz.com/wxyz/ys_investigations/article/0,2132,WXYZ_15949_4237964,00.html

Comment by Jackie | November 20, 2005, 1:57 am

Ok, so the guy in the container wasn’t the guy involved with the 14 year old boy’s disappearance, but the response from the Aruban authorities seems awfully familiar.

Comment by Jackie | November 20, 2005, 2:02 am

I AM SO SORRY FOR HIS FAMILY. ARUBA IS NOT SAFE FOR AMERICANS HOW MANY WILL HAVE TO DIE BEFORE WE AMERICANS FIGURE THIS OUT. IT IS NOT SAFE AND THEY HAVE NO LAWS TO PROTECT THEMSELFS LET ALONE US. BOYCOTT IS THE ANSWER UNTIL THEY CHANGE THE WAY THE LAW WORKS THERE.. GRAM23

Comment by Grandma23 | November 20, 2005, 2:09 am

This man hasn’t even had a completed autopsy yet, and already most of you are blaming this on the NH disappearance and slinging mud.

As alot of you have said in your own words to the Aruba gov’t, police and people, I will say the same to you … “Shame on you.”

Comment by jim hanson | November 20, 2005, 2:22 am

My condolences to the family so close to the Holidays. It was locked from the inside? Strange. They’ll probably rule it suicide, depending on the type of container itself.

GL - Leap of faith? Or just ignorance? All in all, it’s a tragedy and it’s rude for you to capitalize on this man’s death in an effort to try to trash Natalee and this site. Have some respect or do you enjoy trying to make other people’s deaths look as meaningless as you make Natalee’s disappearance?

Comment by DC | November 20, 2005, 5:09 am

I tried to book a one week vacation to Aruba tonight on the net. I tried about 6 different sites. As of tonight, the earliest I can depart is the third week of January 2006.

Comment by jim hanson | November 20, 2005, 5:11 am

Aruban Law Enforcement (ALE) = another oxymoron. How can this be on this beautiful crimeless island?? Yet another sorrowful reason to boycott, BLuesky.

Comment by Joe | November 20, 2005, 7:54 am

So 4 people have been murdered in Aruba since Natalee disappeared. Including Natalee - that is a total of 5 people in 6 months. Aruba is a very unsafe place to visit; worse than Jamaca.

I remember the live interview in June of the two black security guards who were in jail and one said it’s obvious the 3 suspects; Joran, Deepak and Satish murdered the girl and if the Polis configured that out - then they need to get a job else where. With all thats happened it is becoming more apparent that this is a coverup; and those found dead had information to solve the case. Paulus van der Sloot, Dennis Jacobs, and Van Stratten are very dangerous and will do everything to destroy this case. This includes eliminating every bit of evidence and all possible witnesses.

Comment by cal | November 20, 2005, 8:16 am

This can’t be true … Aruba is one happy island, with no crime.

Haven’t they told us this often enough?

Comment by Richard | November 20, 2005, 8:20 am

To S. Hollaway:

Death is a Part of Life. Even in Aruba people Die Everyday…(Incredible?!?! HUH ??)

1. The guy lying on the Beach commited suicide.

2. About the second guy I do not have information right now. The investigation will have to take its course…

My condolences to families of these two persons…

Comment by Bluesky | November 20, 2005, 12:10 pm

I think aruba (my impression) is a lawless and dangerous place with a touristy “fascade” meant to part people from their cash.

I dont have confidence they will solve this crime either. They seem to know how to mix drinks, thats about it.

Comment by SB | November 20, 2005, 1:26 pm

why not post the Americans that died in Iraq last week? More newsworthy and just as relevant to the Holloway case

Comment by sunny71 | November 20, 2005, 1:41 pm

Gabriel Leo: Your reading comprehension needs some work. There was NOTHING in the article about Natalee Holloway.

Comment by monkey wench | November 20, 2005, 2:21 pm

gl is making the suggestion, but sm is making him do it. someone else is always responsible. there is no one in charge on aruba. sm, you should be ashamed of yourself. bad boy, bad boy.

and thanks for being here for us.
dennisintn

Comment by dennisintn | November 20, 2005, 2:24 pm

I am very sorry for the family in this situation. I do hope they get answers and justice in this matter.

Comment by monkey wench | November 20, 2005, 2:27 pm

His family has my sympathies.

Comment by Kelly | November 20, 2005, 2:46 pm

We’re getting an up close and personal view of the European justice system in our own backyard.

Comment by Jeremy | November 20, 2005, 3:10 pm

I’m just curious if Scared Monkeys is going to keep an eye on this story and follow it up so we can find out why this man is dead …

Comment by jim hanson | November 21, 2005, 2:23 am

I just googled “robert wayne benson” and got no related web sites. I googled “robert benson dead” .. no responses.

I did a yahoo search .. “robert wayne benson” … by the looks of it the only related web page to this search is scared monkeys.

Just an observation.

Seeing as this blog has the only info about this death, I hope they will follow it up as I mentioned earlier …. I’m interested in knowing about his background and the people he knew there … a death like this is certainly not a natural one … it’s foul play … it could be interesting to see what this man did in his spare time …

Well … we’ll see … I hope …

Comment by jim hanson | November 21, 2005, 2:44 am

Question,
If someone from Aruba went missing in say…. New York, and the Natalee case never happened, and the parents went over here to search, how would you react? What if they wanted to bring over their own teams of investigators and asked that their law enforcement be able to take over? Would you scream about what nerve these people have? What about if they started to then blame corruption one both the NYPD, who has had a history of corruption (I don’t recall Aruba holding the same title before this), and the Bush administration (Going to war for WMD’s, Abu Grab, Plame-Gate).
Be honest with yourselves. You would be mad too. Think with on open mind, and this case will look different to you.

Comment by founder | November 21, 2005, 10:34 am

GL…Although there is no suggestion that this crime has ANYTHING to do with the Nat Holloway case, this is additional proof that Aruba is not a safe environment for tourists (maybe not even safe for Arubans). This may be an island ripe for picking, if the citizens do not “get a grip” and demand responsibility and accountibility from all its politicians and everyone involved in criminal investigation and prosecution.

Comment by Kate | November 21, 2005, 11:31 am

Well I would Bet If a Aruban got lost in New york and the family came .. NOt one member from Aruban police would come to the US .. I can bet they would turn the case over to the FBI which would have already been involved.. those morons in Aruba cant even decide to send someone to reinterview the MB kids whats makes you think they would come here for a missings person

Comment by sue | November 21, 2005, 12:44 pm

For Jim Hanson - Go to www.diarioaruba.com and click on diahuebs (Thursday).
Scroll down and you will see the original reporting in the local paper.

Comment by Melissa | November 21, 2005, 12:47 pm

Wayne was my good friend in Aruba for the last seven years. I am very sad
about his death and send my prayers to the family. He had a heart of gold!

Comment by Linda | November 21, 2005, 1:01 pm

Oh, so people want to know what happened to this man, huh? God help his family if the make too big a deal out of it because then Aruban LE and Jim Hanson and friends will blame them for the man’s death.

Comment by monkey wench | November 21, 2005, 1:19 pm

To people who cannot read:

“they forced the door of the container which was locked from the inside “…

Suicide maybe???

Comment by Bluesky | November 21, 2005, 1:27 pm

This site http://newdatinggame.blogspot.com/ says that it was padlocked which implies from the outside.

Comment by Julie | November 21, 2005, 1:52 pm

Funny thing … a man is found dead in a locked container in Aruba, and the majority of people here think it’s the end of the world.

Do you know how many horrible murders take place in the united states every day of every week? Of course, with these murders, we see it on the news or read it in the paper and forget about it the next day.

It’s ok to have thousands of murders a year in the usa and just forget it as a part of life. But when a death like this man pops up in Aruba … oh my god! It’s unsafe to even LIVE in Aruba. Get out now! Everyone leave!

For God’s sake, get a grip on yourselves. Alot of you here remind me of fictional programmed robots that sit in front of a computer.

Comment by jim hanson | November 21, 2005, 2:38 pm

10. Birmingham, Alabama
Population: 238,167
All violent crimes: 3,261
Murder and non-negligent manslaughter: 59
Forcible rape: 240
Robbery: 1,369
Aggravated assault: 1,593
Property crime: 19,477
Burglary: 5,156
Larceny/theft: 11,970

www.cnn.com
Motor vehicle theft: 2,351
Arson: 142

Comment by Hello Kitty | November 21, 2005, 2:38 pm

re: benson
family and friends know he had a monkey on his back. it was off for ahile but it
returned. RIP

Comment by a. FRIEND | November 21, 2005, 3:56 pm

My sympathys to Mr. Benson’s family. I watched Dompig, Beth and Dr. Michael Baden on fox last night. Dompig said he don’t believe this has anything to do with the sex slave trade and he believes it’s a homicide involving the 3 suspects. I give him credit for saying that.

I have tried to remember any missing American tourist abroad where someone is held accountable. Amy Bradley’s family got the same kind of treatment. Sweep it under the carpet and they will go away George Smith on the cruise ship… they cleaned up the blood and his room and went about business. Dr. Baden also thanked Beth for keeping this out there to bring attention to such problems. He too believes Natalee’s case is a homicide. Dompig also said results of the tapes are going to be in and if they are authentic, Deepak is coming back in for questions. I only hope the FBI are allowed to help.

I’ve followed this case from the start and decided one day to go online and sign up showing my support to Natalee’s families. I came across dif. sites,, and couldn’t believe some of the horrible things being said about them. I then came across this site and have since recommended it to others. I know its brought awareness to me about things I knew nothing about going on. I heard Beth say the support is what keeps them going. I still come here to support both families and for those wanting to make light of just one person. Natalee was just one missing person, big deal. When you sit down at the table for Thanksgiving, look over and imagine your family by you wasnt sitting in that chair..not now..not ever again.. then the impact of just one missing person will mean something. I pray for all those who have lost loved ones to crime or. It don’t matter how rich or poor,whether you are a prostitute or a ceo or what nationality. Every victim should be treated with dignity and given a respectable investigation.

Comment by Sharise | November 21, 2005, 6:00 pm

WAYNE BENSON WAS A VERY DEAR FRIEND OF MINE. I KNEW HIM FOR MANY YEARS BEFORE HE WENT TO THAT GODFORSAKEN ISLAND OF ARUBA. HE SHARED HIS STRUGGLES WITH ME AND I ENCOURAGED HIM TO COME HOME WHERE PEOPLE LOVE AND CARE ABOUT HIM BUT WAYNE WAS STUBBORN AND TOO PROUD TO GIVE UP. HE SAID “I NEED TO MAKE A GO OF IT”. WAYNE WAS THE KIND OF GUY WHO WOULD ALWAYS BE READY TO HELP SOMEBODY ELSE WITHOUT REGARD FOR HIMSELF. THE MOST CARING AND UNSELFISH PERSON I HAVE EVER KNOWN.

Comment by TOM CROWLEY | November 21, 2005, 8:42 pm

I was trolling the IMDB site tonite for a few movies and as per usual I went off course with links and found an actress in a movie that was shot twice in the chest outside her west hollywood apartment by a man that had received her autograph 20 minutes before he killed her and had asked her out but she said she was busy. This got me to thinking about senseless murder, like John Lennon, the Manson murders and many more. Her name by the way is Rebecca Shaeffer. She was 21 years old. What a motive. No date, bang bang …

I decided to do a little research, and I came up with some very disturbing figures. On average, in the last 5 years, 16,600 americans are murdered every year. That’s 44 people per day. The vast majority of these murders are comitted with guns. 43% of these murders are comitted in the southern states … Louisiana, Alabama, Texas etc … the reason by statistics showing racism between blacks and whites.

This past Sunday, a 20 year old kid in Tacoma decided he’d take an AK-47 into a mall and go on a shooting spree and take hostages because he was mad at his ex girlfriend. A few weeks ago an 18 year old man killed his 14 year old girlfriend’s parents with a gun, and the two of them took off till they were arrested. A few weeks ago, a “gothic” (described the media) type of teenager bludgeoned to death Daniel Horowitz’s wife. He is 16 years old. About six weeks ago, a convict and his “girlfiend” planned an escape from a courthouse and killed a policeman in the process. These are just a few of the probable 8000+ murders in the usa since Natalee Holloway disappeared.

Look at these statistics. Look at them. If you don’t believe me, look them up yourself. Takes 5 minutes.

Just a note to all you americans here that are screaming about another american being found dead in a “container” in Aruba. I think you had better think about the possible 8000+ americans that have been murdered in your own country since NH disappeared and stop thinking about a random death in Aruba. I think before you open your keyboards here, you should think about where YOU live, and how unsafe it is to be living there. Statistically speaking, it is much more probable that an american will be kiiled in a mall while shopping than in Aruba. It is much more probable that a famous american will be shot to death in america than in Aruba. Would you like to talk about children? It is much more likely for a young child to be kidnapped, raped and murdered in america than it is in Aruba.

Stop calling Aruba an unsafe place to live.

Pay attention to your own country.

All you americans here that are badmouthing the living conditions in Aruba are total hypocrites.

Comment by jim hanson | November 22, 2005, 6:55 am

Goeie morgen,

Today there is an official statement by the Friends of the American man that was found dead in the container.

Like I said before, he had a heart condition and this was atributed to his death. However I was misinformed by two of his friends that it was as consequence of an overdose.

His friends want to make it clear that it was a heart attack and not a suicide. He used to lock himself in the container he uses as a shop. It even had air conditioning and normal door installed.

They ended the statement in English for those who are using his name right now:

“Wayne,we have to clear your name, because we as your closest friends know that you were clean. Francis, Eric, Arris, Paul, Natalie, Goy, Igor, Nancy, Saturno, Florencio, Alex, Gui, Hubert, Patrick and Aldo. Cu nos amigo Wayne sosega na Paz.”

Posted by: MF | Nov 22, 2005 6:54:23 AM

Comment by C.I.T. | November 22, 2005, 9:18 am

The mother of Max and Beth Twitty have one thing in common. They both arrived in Aruba with their flyers already printed. Beth Twitty arrived on Tuesday with a bunch of flyers saying that her daughter was kidnapped before even speaking to anyone in particular about the possible disappearance of her daughter. The mother of Max came to Aruba with her new boyfriend and her two children, her late husband just passed away (FBI should investigate the cause of death) and after a few days had flyers printed already and assumed that Max drowned. How can a mother five up so fast on her son. And the person who was with Max last was an American that according to the mother they met just that day!?! Aruba is NOT dangerous. The people who come here to commit their crimes are the ones that are so dangerous. Sad, very sad.

Comment by Rina | November 22, 2005, 4:06 pm

Someone said “how many people will have to die before they see Aruba is evil” or something like that. The answer = 0
1 is a missing persons case
1 is probably a suicide

Your welcomed!

Comment by commonsense | November 22, 2005, 6:27 pm

I share my sentiment with Tom. Wayne Benson walked into my life 7 years ago. Wayne was a well respected, caring, and thoughtful individual, who tried very hard to live his dream of making island life work for him. He had a wonderful way about him that was appealing to so many people. He had an outgoing personality, a soft spoken voice, and a kind, generous spirit. We used to climb the big mountain in Aruba years ago — we used to have “pot-boiling” discussions about life - we used to listen to “Johnny Lang” while Wayne worked on motorcyles and I enjoyed lounging in the hot summer sun!! I used to listen intently as he told me about the day to day struggles that island life brought his way. Wayne was strong and courageous - he gave it his best shot to make a life on the island - it was very hard for him, as it would be for any of us - he just took it a step further than most of us would and kept at it for 7 years - always believing it would get better. We all hoped things would have gotten better for him…. I believe in my heart that Wayne is at peace with God now and that his spirit will live on in each of us that knew him. My heartfelt condolences to his family.

Comment by Michelle St. Michael | November 22, 2005, 7:36 pm

From the Forum … Aruba Girl
http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?p=312702#312702

Sort of off-topic, but according to an article in Diario today the guy who died in the container died from an heart attack. The article was signed by his friends who wanted to set the record straight.

My excuses if it was already reported, just saw that you guys were interested in it.

Good evening.

Comment by Scared Monkeys | November 22, 2005, 10:51 pm

Commonsense: Which one is a suicide? the guy in a container? I didnt know you could do that
When i decide to commit suicide after im done im going to lock myself
in a container. Or better yet ill kill myself IN the container, dying in a cramped space
of lack of oxygen is probably the most comfortable and quickest way to go

Comment by derp | November 23, 2005, 2:39 am

My condolences and prayers to Mr. Benson’s family. Way to young..

Beth hasn’t said anything about the NUMBER of crimes in Aruba or Alabama,

Her complaint is and has been all along after a crime is committed, they get a botched investigation, and Dave being told, we was kinda hoping it would all just go away by now. Last I knew there were no missing Aruban tourists in Alabama with cases handled like that.

As for flyers.. everyone always says the first 48 hour of an investigation are crucial.. When her daughter didn’t come home on the plane with her classmates, thats a good indication her daughter was kidnapped or worse.
Dave said when he arrived about 48 hours after she went missing ..the first 2 police stations on the island didn’t even know there was a missing girl. They sent him to a 3rd station, where he was asked, how much money do you have and go drink a beer, she’ll be back.
Look what was done in the first 10 days of this investigation. That’s what their complaint is..

Comment by Sharise | November 23, 2005, 7:00 am

Tom Crowley and Michell St. Michael: My heart felt sympathies to you both. It’s always difficult to lose a friend.

Comment by monkey wench | November 23, 2005, 12:08 pm

To everyone who knew my dad,thank-you for your condolences.My dad lived his life the way he wanted and nobody can fault him for that after all nobodies perfect.Some of us can slay our demons and others can not.We all miss him greatly

Comment by Daviid Benson | December 11, 2005, 6:48 pm

Wayne had 30 years of problems……But he is at peace now…… David good luck with your life and move forward with only fond memories thats what will help you go on!

Comment by Friend from the past | December 23, 2005, 8:46 pm

Beth Twitty, Arlene Ellis Schipper, Joe Tacopina will be on Greta tonight.

Comment by San | April 17, 2006, 9:40 pm

Leave a comment
 Name (required)

 e-Mail (required - will not be published)

 Website



 


« Previous | Next »


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Smish on August 09, 2006, 06:19:53 PM
Quote from: "SunnyinTX"
Quote from: "Smish"


Is the time of June 13 consistent w/ the date that SCOOP summoned Beth & Jug to the courthouse, only to prove yet again what a lying poseur she was and what an enabler of evil exists in her micromini brain.

LOL on the scoop thing...she aint no scoop anything,she IS a renHO.


hahahah  Smish I knew I was gonna like you!! :D[/quote]

LOL....renHO brings the :twisted: out in me.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: igsigs on August 09, 2006, 06:20:04 PM
Quote from: "Appeals"
Does anyone else have an "Ah Ha! "  moment when reading the following:

The man who had driven the green Yaris called me to come over to where he was. I went over to him. The man was sitting in the car. The man asked me in Papiamentu whether or not the story we told was true. I said yes to him. During the conversation I had with him I had for one reason or another shot my mouth off and said something about the sporting shoes. The man asked me what I meant by sporting shoes. I then said to him that I was thinking about something unrelated/different

Who is the man?

And there's those damning SHOES again!

Appeals, there is a good chance this man is Charles Croes.

And yes, the sporting shoes reference caught my eye also. Along with Deepak's non-explanation as to why he even "shot his mouth off" about it in the first place.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Frijole on August 09, 2006, 06:22:03 PM
Quote from: "the big hammer"
Automotive Enterprises

From June 29, 2005 Police Car Transcript:

Joran: Who has said about burying? I didn't say anything about burying.
Deepak: That's what you have stated. Stop with that bullshit.
Joran: I have said nothing about burying. The only thing what I can think of, is that you know people that it is the people of automotive enterprises.
Satish: Yeah, yeah,yeah, yeah,yeah,yeah, then I had a flat tire, right? Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah,yeah... I picked you up, right. And then I went back to the beach for her.
Joran: Who has said that?
Satish: You said that.
Joran: I have never said that friend. I have never said that you went back, friend.
Joran: That's your problem. If they find that girl, then they will see that shit.

From deepak June 13, 2005 statement:

To your question whether anyone has has ever thrown up in my car, I can say the following. Nobody has ever thrown up/vomited in my car.

To your question from whom I bought the car, I can say the following. I bought the car from a man called David GROSS. He works at a company called "Carufa". I must tell you that when they installed the sound in my car, they used a lot of glue and seal/sealant under the carpet of the car. They had to remove the carpets to pull new cables through the car. You can verify this at "Automotive Enterprises". The man who installed it is called Osman OSMAN. I don't know if anyone had an accident/car crash with this car prior to it being sold to me.

*************************************************

OK --

This is an interesting side-by-side of Automotive Enterprises mentions.

In the polis car transcript, it's very possible to interpret jvds saying that if they find the girl, they will find that "chit" as being followon to previous mention of Automotive Enterprises which jvds also initiates.

He seems to be saying that he knows the kalpoe car was worked on there, and the "chit" could very well be the carpeting/floor mats pulled from there...

So who is Osman?

And is it true that American mechanic who was found dead stuffed in crate (?) worked at this place: Automotive Enterprises?


I threw that out there as well as that guy Peeps who used to post here (worked at automotive place).... The American mechanic worked for the Harley Davidson repair shop... not sure the name of it.. we have the location thanks to SunFreak.

I am totally with you ---reading that statement... that "chit" could well be the carpeting and some forensics belonging to Natalee.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: mrs. red on August 09, 2006, 06:24:29 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "Appeals"
Does anyone else have an "Ah Ha! "  moment when reading the following:

The man who had driven the green Yaris called me to come over to where he was. I went over to him. The man was sitting in the car. The man asked me in Papiamentu whether or not the story we told was true. I said yes to him. During the conversation I had with him I had for one reason or another shot my mouth off and said something about the sporting shoes. The man asked me what I meant by sporting shoes. I then said to him that I was thinking about something unrelated/different

Who is the man?

And there's those damning SHOES again!

Appeals, there is a good chance this man is Charles Croes.

And yes, the sporting shoes reference caught my eye also. Along with Deepak's non-explanation as to why he even "shot his mouth off" about it in the first place.



the idea that he said "shot his mouth off".... I mean who says that about themselves???


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: the big hammer on August 09, 2006, 06:24:39 PM
JVDS & Automotive Enterprises

The goon is saying that if they find the girl, they find the car mats/carpets, which implicates k2 -- BUT NOT JVDS.

IMO.

He is threatening k2.

ANd if paulus indeed masterminded hiding of body of Natalee -- then every possible link to his son would have been removed (of course, maybe not everything ala DNA, but any and all obvious signs which could be tracked back to jvds, like sneakers, eg).

AND, all possible incriminating evidence tying K2 to the body would be there with the body -- anything and everything.

And then railroad job "number two" would commence.

This all strongly suggests that a badly injured or assualted, or even dead, Natalee was in the kalpoe car at some point.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: blah on August 09, 2006, 06:26:13 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
BLAH

Sometime by 6-13, while under arrest, and during a joint interrogation together with Current Suspect DEEPAK KALPOE and Current Suspect SATISH KALPOE in the same police interrogation room, Prime Suspect JORAN VAN DER SLOOT changed his alibi-lies AGAIN, and now claims Current Suspect SATISH KALPOE, Current Suspect DEEPAK KALPOE, and NATALEE took Prime Suspect JORAN VAN DER SLOOT to his home where while sitting in the car outside the home NATALEE and Prime Suspect JORAN VAN DER SLOOT exchanged email addresses and said goodbye (time?), then Prime Suspect JORAN VAN DER SLOOT went into his home and Current Suspect DEEPAK KALPOE and Current Suspect SATISH KALPOE drove NATALEE to the “Holiday Inn.”

NOTE:  Above I pointed out that this does not match the signed attestation statement of same date, signed by JanVDS on 6/17/06.  Why?  Because they practiced different statements until they got one that would implicate the K2 and exonerate the SPORTER.


Exactly! and when Joran realized that the pin job on the 2 security guards was falling through(right about this time), he turned his sites to the Kalpoe borthers !


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Smish on August 09, 2006, 06:31:43 PM
Quote from: "Frijole"
Quote from: "ala_gunslinger"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Gunslinger - If you find the location of where Benson worked I'd be happy to add it to the map.  I do remember we knew once the name of his employment but I can't search for it right now.  If someone remembers and can get the address and can try to place it on a map.

I've been very busy getting the statements ready for posting and haven't had time for much else.


I understand.  Thank you again for all your hard work.


GSlinger -

I just searched archives and Benson worked for the Harley Davidson shop... unsure if that is the same as Automotive Enterprises or not.  I have the address for the dealership but the repair place might be at a different site :

Big Twin - official Harley-Davidson Dealership
L.G. Smith Blvd. 124a
P.O. Box 5094
Oranjestad, Aruba

But Automotive Enterprises has been discusssed here on more than one occasions...

Automotive Enterprises N.V.
Address: Wayaca z/n
Phone: (297) 582-6594
Fax: (297) 583-4499  
Categories: Automobile parts -new-


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Appeals on August 09, 2006, 06:34:48 PM
Quote from: mrs. red
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "Appeals"
Appeals, there is a good chance this man is Charles Croes.

And yes, the sporting shoes reference caught my eye also. Along with Deepak's non-explanation as to why he even "shot his mouth off" about it in the first place.



the idea that he said "shot his mouth off".... I mean who says that about themselves???


 Hi Mrs. RED.  Only someone who regrets they brought it up IMO.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Katysmom on August 09, 2006, 06:34:58 PM
Quote from: "Smish"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
KLAASEN, what is the date of the rush to the courthouse where JR inserts herself into this, after summoning Jug & Beth to let her ride with them to the courthouse.  I have it from a 6/13/05 article, but not sure that is the date of the occurrence.


I believe it was June 13th.

But wait,When renHO went with the family to the courthouse wasn't this because renHO said they had Nat's body there?If so,then a body was reported twice?


Wouldn't it seem strange that they would take a body to a courthouse and not a hospital, morgue, or coroner's office?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: blah on August 09, 2006, 06:35:25 PM
Quote from: "Smish"

Hi Blah
VERY interesting...so they interrogated J2K all together.I think you are right,they had to ALL come up with the same story.But I wonder why those stories are STILL different?Deepak says he nor Satish picked Joran up at the beach.Joran now says that they do?


Hi Smish,
I just take it as Joran is trying so desperatly to put someone else (in the case 1 or both of the K's) as the last person to be with Natalee.  

Unfortunatly for him, he cannot do it.  As hard as he tries to NOT be the last person with Natalee, he cant change it.  Why?  Because he really was the last person with her.

They all raped her, Joran killed her, and then Joran and his dad got rid of the body afte the K2's split for home and left him to take care of the mess he created when he killed her.  This is why Deepaks statement in the back of the police car "your own father?, unbelieveable"  Deepak couldnt believe Joran recruited his own father to help get rid of the body.  We already know that Deepak knows that Joran raped her, he said it in his previous statement.   He just omits the part where he and his brother take a turn too.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: igsigs on August 09, 2006, 06:36:08 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"

the idea that he said "shot his mouth off".... I mean who says that about themselves???

Hey Mrs.Red. "Shot my mouth off" to me means a statement made out of emotion followed by regret. ie...I shouldn't have mentioned the sporting shoes...so please forget about it...for i have no explanation for it.

If this was Charles Croes he was speaking too, i would like to hear his version.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: ala_gunslinger on August 09, 2006, 06:36:47 PM
They have the dna from the floorboard.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: blah on August 09, 2006, 06:39:02 PM
Quote from: "the big hammer"


And is it true that American mechanic who was found dead stuffed in crate (?) worked at this place: Automotive Enterprises?


I thought this guy was a mechanic for the Harley Davidson dealership but dont take that as gospel.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Frijole on August 09, 2006, 06:39:21 PM
Quote from: "Katysmom"


Wouldn't it seem strange that they would take a body to a courthouse and not a hospital, morgue, or coroner's office?


Yeah... but we are talking about a place where people in trouble call the radio station and Carlos/charlies versus the police for help... who knows!??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: WidgetTheMidget on August 09, 2006, 06:39:52 PM
Quote from: "Frijole"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
[/b]HAMMER:  
I wonder where they dump old (or stained) car floor mats and carpeting in Aruba?

Wherever they dump the bodies.  Remember the statement from Deepak, if they find the girl, they are going to find all "that shit."  What shit?  The carpeting and interior of his car?


Joran's shoes, the cup that had traces of date rape drug on it, the video????


If You Find Jorans Shoes ............

You Will Find Natalee ...........

 :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Frijole on August 09, 2006, 06:41:04 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "mrs. red"

the idea that he said "shot his mouth off".... I mean who says that about themselves???

Hey Mrs.Red. "Shot my mouth off" to me means a statement made out of emotion followed by regret. ie...I shouldn't have mentioned the sporting shoes...so please forget about it...for i have no explanation for it.

If this was Charles Croes he was speaking too, i would like to hear his version.


Yes... as a matter of fact - I would love to hear the entire unedited version of Charles' interview with Greta... remember it from early June?  Very clandestine.  Knowing what we know now... it may be more meaningful.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on August 09, 2006, 06:41:06 PM
Quote from: "Smish"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
KLAASEN, what is the date of the rush to the courthouse where JR inserts herself into this, after summoning Jug & Beth to let her ride with them to the courthouse.  I have it from a 6/13/05 article, but not sure that is the date of the occurrence.


I believe it was June 13th.

But wait,When renHO went with the family to the courthouse wasn't this because renHO said they had Nat's body there?If so,then a body was reported twice?


That's right. :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Frijole on August 09, 2006, 06:42:17 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "the big hammer"


And is it true that American mechanic who was found dead stuffed in crate (?) worked at this place: Automotive Enterprises?


I thought this guy was a mechanic for the Harley Davidson dealership but dont take that as gospel.


re - reading it, it was a shop that repairs Harleys... big diff... but we still don't know if it was automotive enterprises or not.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: robots on August 09, 2006, 06:43:12 PM
WHERE ARE THE SHOES ???

JORAN used them as a BUOY MARKER  :evil:  :evil:  :evil:  :evil:


DOGS...
hmmmmm

maybe they buried her clothes on the BEACH and could not FIND them
and brought some DOGS to the BEACH to help find em  


BASTARDS


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: ala_gunslinger on August 09, 2006, 06:43:37 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "the big hammer"


And is it true that American mechanic who was found dead stuffed in crate (?) worked at this place: Automotive Enterprises?


I thought this guy was a mechanic for the Harley Davidson dealership but dont take that as gospel.


You are correct.

I don't remember the container being locked from the 'inside'.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Smish on August 09, 2006, 06:46:10 PM
Quote from: "Katysmom"
Quote from: "Smish"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
KLAASEN, what is the date of the rush to the courthouse where JR inserts herself into this, after summoning Jug & Beth to let her ride with them to the courthouse.  I have it from a 6/13/05 article, but not sure that is the date of the occurrence.


I believe it was June 13th.

But wait,When renHO went with the family to the courthouse wasn't this because renHO said they had Nat's body there?If so,then a body was reported twice?


Wouldn't it seem strange that they would take a body to a courthouse and not a hospital, morgue, or coroner's office?

I think so KatysMom.But this is Aruba where they let"scoops of stuff"fly around and help them"investigate".


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: blah on August 09, 2006, 06:48:17 PM
Quote from: "Frijole"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "the big hammer"


And is it true that American mechanic who was found dead stuffed in crate (?) worked at this place: Automotive Enterprises?


I thought this guy was a mechanic for the Harley Davidson dealership but dont take that as gospel.


re - reading it, it was a shop that repairs Harleys... big diff... but we still don't know if it was automotive enterprises or not.


you are right, i just read that article up above that says "a shop that repairs cars and motorcycles"

I have never heard of a Harley dealer that repairs cars and I have been to ALOT of Harley dealerships!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on August 09, 2006, 06:49:04 PM
Saturday, June 11, 2005
 
 
ORANJESTAD, Aruba — Reports conflicted Saturday in developments of the Alabama honor student who has been missing in Aruba for almost two weeks.

David Cruz*** a spokesman for the Aruban Minister of Justice (search) told FOX News Natalee Holloway (search), who was on vacation with friends with a graduation trip when she disappeared, was confirmed dead and that authorities knew the location of her body.

However, Cruz later retracted the statement, saying he was a victim of a "misinformation campaign."

The mother of the 18-year-old told FOX News authorities had not yet contacted them with this information but did say that Natalee's father, who is divorced from her mother, was with investigators looking for the body.

These reports came after significant, and at times conflicting, developments with the five suspects being detained in the case.

The "Diario," a local daily newspaper, is reporting that a human blood sample found in a car at the residence of one of the teens in custody — the 17-year-old son of a high-ranking island judicuary official — is now being sent to the U.S. and will be tested for a possible match to Natalee, whose mother gave a blood sample to investigators.


One of the young men detained admitted "something bad happened" to the woman after they took her to the beach, a police officer said, while prosecutors said the investigation was at a crucial point.

But prosecutors refused to comment on the statement by Deputy Police Commissioner Gerold Dompig (search), who told The Associated Press that the man who made that admission was leading police to the scene. He refused to identify which of the three young men who took Holloway to a northern beach the night she went missing made the statement.

Police refused Saturday morning to say whether they discovered anything overnight to solve the mystery of what happened to Holloway, who was last seen in the early hours of May 30.

Referring to Dompig's statement, prosecution spokeswoman Vivian van der Biezen (search) said Saturday: "We neither confirm nor deny any information coming from other sources ... [about] alleged statements of suspects in this case."

"The investigation at the moment is the following: Five suspects are being held ... and we are at a very crucial, very important moment in our investigation," she said.

A judge ruled Saturday that police can continue to detain three young men — two Surinamese brothers and the Dutch teen — arrested in the disappearance of Holloway.

Police also have detained two other men — former security guards at a hotel near the one where Holloway was staying. No one has been charged in the case.

Holloway vanished during a five-day trip to the Dutch Caribbean island with 124 classmates and seven chaperones celebrating their graduation from Mountain Brook, Ala., High School, near Birmingham. Police found her U.S. passport and packed bags in her hotel room after she failed to show up for her return flight that day.

Prime Minister Nelson Oduber said on national radio Friday night that if something happened to Holloway, it would damage the reputation of this island of 97,000 people, which depends on tourism and is considered one of the safest spots in the Caribbean.

In Holloway's hometown, her friends gathered after midnight at a church where people have been holding prayer vigils for her. Some hugged and cried; one woman left a flickering candle at the base of a wall decorated with messages to Holloway, who had earned a full scholarship to the University of Alabama, where she planned to study medicine.

Antonio Carlo, an attorney for the Dutch minor, told the AP: "My client maintains his innocence."

Holloway's mother and stepfather told The Birmingham News in Alabama that they discovered the Dutch boy's connection to their daughter within 24 hours of her disappearance by talking to other students on the trip. They then found surveillance videotapes showing him playing poker with other Mountain Brook teens in their hotel casino two days before she vanished.

A lawyer for one of the Surinamese — Satish Kalpoe, 18, whose brother, Deepak, 21, also is in custody — said they told police they took Holloway to Arashi Beach, on the northern part of the island, in the early hours of May 30.

According to their police statement, they did not get out of the car, Carlo said. Instead, Holloway and the Dutch teen, an honors student at the Aruba International School whom she had met at the casino in her hotel, "were in the back seat kissing."

They also told police that they dropped Holloway at her Holiday Inn at about 2 a.m. and last saw her being approached by a man in a security guard uniform before they drove off, Kock said.

The brothers told police the blonde, blue-eyed young woman was drunk and refused to get out of the car, said Noraina Pietersz, who is representing Mickey John, 30, one of the two former security guards. He and Abraham Jones, 28, have been detained since Sunday.

The three young men said Holloway stumbled in the parking lot of the hotel but refused help from her Dutch escort, Kock said.

Holiday Inn employees say security cameras did not record Holloway's return. A Holiday Inn guard who worked the overnight shift that day said he did not see her, said Pietersz, who said she reviewed the guard's statement to police.

[/b]


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: tcumom on August 09, 2006, 06:49:10 PM
Quote from: "Frijole"

The problem with just emailing these guys is that they don't devote any time to putting it together in their OWN minds and aren't up to speed.... I think Geraldo Rivera might give it a shot or if we contacted someone like Mark Furhman so that HE could talk about it on these shows.  

In other words - educate the guest vs. tell the host.  The hosts don't get it.

I'm really behind, so this may have been mentioned~
What about Mark Fuhrman on Dana's show?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: ala_gunslinger on August 09, 2006, 06:49:19 PM
Quote from: "Smish"
Quote from: "Katysmom"
Quote from: "Smish"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
KLAASEN, what is the date of the rush to the courthouse where JR inserts herself into this, after summoning Jug & Beth to let her ride with them to the courthouse.  I have it from a 6/13/05 article, but not sure that is the date of the occurrence.


I believe it was June 13th.

But wait,When renHO went with the family to the courthouse wasn't this because renHO said they had Nat's body there?If so,then a body was reported twice?


Wouldn't it seem strange that they would take a body to a courthouse and not a hospital, morgue, or coroner's office?

I think so KatysMom.But this is Aruba where they let"scoops of stuff"fly around and help them"investigate".


And that is a fact!  Proven when Greta was in aruba the last time.  ale published a bolo for her the next day!  

Dayum!!!  If they only knew what a 'clue' was!!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: oldfart on August 09, 2006, 06:49:47 PM
Hi Monkeys...
Dropping by for a bit  and got a question  on this
from "DEEPAK - JUNE 10TH STATEMENT "
Quote
To your question whether I can remember the day when I was summoned to the police station at Bubali, I can say the following. Yes I remember that day.

You are telling to me that my car looked very clean on that day. About that I can state the following, I had vacuumed my car the previous day.

To your question as to why I had vacuumed my car the previous day, I can state the following. I thought my car was dirty on the inside there was a lot of sand.

To your question as to how dirty my car was on the inside, I can state the following. There was a lot of sand inside of the car.

To your question as to when I had been to the beach for the last time, I can state the following. I had been to a party on the beach about two or three weeks ago.

To your question as to where the sand came from the day in question that I vacuumed the car, I can state the following. The sand came from Joran, because he had almost fallen into the water and after that he had sat down in my car with sand on his shorts and on his legs


My question~  when did Deepak go to police station at Bubali and where was he and Joran together  that there is water & sand AND Joran got back in the car?
 :?

TIA


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Smish on August 09, 2006, 06:50:06 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "Smish"

Hi Blah
VERY interesting...so they interrogated J2K all together.I think you are right,they had to ALL come up with the same story.But I wonder why those stories are STILL different?Deepak says he nor Satish picked Joran up at the beach.Joran now says that they do?


Hi Smish,
I just take it as Joran is trying so desperatly to put someone else (in the case 1 or both of the K's) as the last person to be with Natalee.  

Unfortunatly for him, he cannot do it.  As hard as he tries to NOT be the last person with Natalee, he cant change it.  Why?  Because he really was the last person with her.

They all raped her, Joran killed her, and then Joran and his dad got rid of the body afte the K2's split for home and left him to take care of the mess he created when he killed her.  This is why Deepaks statement in the back of the police car "your own father?, unbelieveable"  Deepak couldnt believe Joran recruited his own father to help get rid of the body.  We already know that Deepak knows that Joran raped her, he said it in his previous statement.   He just omits the part where he and his brother take a turn too.

Filthy rotten creeps.
With Paulus being the biggest creep of them all.Anita and Paulus....hope they are proud of the monster they made.I hope their parenting skills have no effect on the 2 other sons.
:x


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Smish on August 09, 2006, 06:53:09 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Smish"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
KLAASEN, what is the date of the rush to the courthouse where JR inserts herself into this, after summoning Jug & Beth to let her ride with them to the courthouse.  I have it from a 6/13/05 article, but not sure that is the date of the occurrence.


I believe it was June 13th.

But wait,When renHO went with the family to the courthouse wasn't this because renHO said they had Nat's body there?If so,then a body was reported twice?


That's right. :wink:

 :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Frijole on August 09, 2006, 06:54:07 PM
Quote from: "tcumom"
Quote from: "Frijole"

The problem with just emailing these guys is that they don't devote any time to putting it together in their OWN minds and aren't up to speed.... I think Geraldo Rivera might give it a shot or if we contacted someone like Mark Furhman so that HE could talk about it on these shows.  

In other words - educate the guest vs. tell the host.  The hosts don't get it.

I'm really behind, so this may have been mentioned~
What about Mark Fuhrman on Dana's show?


I would LOVE that for selfish reasons... would love to know his take.  

What we were brainstorming on is trying to get the word out to the WORLD about these statements being released... I was just saying that simply emailing Greta etc. doesn't guarantee that the audience will be educated on how obvious it is that there is a cover up... unless someone like Mark F. is a guest and HE puts the pieces together.

Sadly, Greta and the others have no idea what has been going on and certainly don't remember the details that we do regarding who said what and when.... they wouldn't do it justice unless they tied it all together.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: San on August 09, 2006, 06:54:59 PM
Just to add a little regarding the work that was done on Deepak's car.  My nephew happened to walk in the house and I show him the part of Deepak's statement about his car.  My nephew does the exact kind of work that Deepak is talking about.  I asked him for his comments and he said the following:

Automotive carpet is formed to the contour of the car and is not glued down it is held in place by the seats and door sill plates. Also there is no reason to remove the carpet to run wires. Even in the most expensive systems there is no reason to remove the carpet.  In order to remove the carpet you must remove the front and rear seats and center console.  Also if you have the same make/model car all the parts are interchangeable.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on August 09, 2006, 06:56:18 PM
Auto Excellence
Cura Cabai 137
San Nicolas, Aruba
Phone:011-297-584-5833

http://www.rccomponents.com/aruba.htm

Near San Nicholas


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on August 09, 2006, 06:57:17 PM
Quote from: "Frijole"
Quote from: "tcumom"
Quote from: "Frijole"

The problem with just emailing these guys is that they don't devote any time to putting it together in their OWN minds and aren't up to speed.... I think Geraldo Rivera might give it a shot or if we contacted someone like Mark Furhman so that HE could talk about it on these shows.  

In other words - educate the guest vs. tell the host.  The hosts don't get it.

I'm really behind, so this may have been mentioned~
What about Mark Fuhrman on Dana's show?


I would LOVE that for selfish reasons... would love to know his take.  

What we were brainstorming on is trying to get the word out to the WORLD about these statements being released... I was just saying that simply emailing Greta etc. doesn't guarantee that the audience will be educated on how obvious it is that there is a cover up... unless someone like Mark F. is a guest and HE puts the pieces together.

Sadly, Greta and the others have no idea what has been going on and certainly don't remember the details that we do regarding who said what and when.... they wouldn't do it justice unless they tied it all together.


Greta only remembers her checks to Scientology and DNC.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: igsigs on August 09, 2006, 06:58:42 PM
Quote from: "robots"
WHERE ARE THE SHOES ???


"Every time we (Deepak, Freddy) asked him about the shoes, he did not answer".

This quote from Deepak comes from Tuesday, the 1st week. If true, it opens up the possibility of NO BEACH at all. Deepak and Freddy already know at this point that Joran left her at the beach. Why would Joran be reluctant to tell them that his shoes were left there also?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on August 09, 2006, 07:02:25 PM
Looking at the bottom of this map, Cura Cabai is in San Nicholas which is below Savaneta where Lorenzo lives.  It is in between Lorenzo's house and the Baby Beach area where the bloody mattress was found.

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/canashito5.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Appeals on August 09, 2006, 07:03:50 PM
From DK's 6/13/05 statement:

On Friday two weeks ago he had arainged a lawyer for us.  

For what it is worth, the meeting with Nadira and Paulus and "family" and this day Paulus arranged for the Kalpoes to have a lawyer was Friday June 3rd.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on August 09, 2006, 07:04:07 PM
SUGGESTION - If anyone has the time, it would be a good idea to EMAIL Nancy Grace regarding the Statements that we are posting.  You can link to the thread in the forum.  

Nancy Grace will cover the case Friday night.  If we send to her today she may have time to take a look prior to her show.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: igsigs on August 09, 2006, 07:04:18 PM
Quote from: "San"
Just to add a little regarding the work that was done on Deepak's car.  My nephew happened to walk in the house and I show him the part of Deepak's statement about his car.  My nephew does the exact kind of work that Deepak is talking about.  I asked him for his comments and he said the following:

Automotive carpet is formed to the contour of the car and is not glued down it is held in place by the seats and door sill plates. Also there is no reason to remove the carpet to run wires. Even in the most expensive systems there is no reason to remove the carpet.  In order to remove the carpet you must remove the front and rear seats and center console.  Also if you have the same make/model car all the parts are interchangeable.


Wow! Great info. And a big thanks to San's nephew!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Smish on August 09, 2006, 07:05:55 PM
Quote from: "San"
Just to add a little regarding the work that was done on Deepak's car.  My nephew happened to walk in the house and I show him the part of Deepak's statement about his car.  My nephew does the exact kind of work that Deepak is talking about.  I asked him for his comments and he said the following:

Automotive carpet is formed to the contour of the car and is not glued down it is held in place by the seats and door sill plates. Also there is no reason to remove the carpet to run wires. Even in the most expensive systems there is no reason to remove the carpet.  In order to remove the carpet you must remove the front and rear seats and center console.  Also if you have the same make/model car all the parts are interchangeable.

 :cry: Hmmmm,very interesting,also very interesting that Deepak even brought this up as it is now a obvious lie.Why make up a lie if you don't HAVE to?I think he got the carpet and some other parts of his car switched out....they may have had Natalee's blood or other DNA on them.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: robots on August 09, 2006, 07:06:57 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
SUGGESTION - If anyone has the time, it would be a good idea to EMAIL Nancy Grace regarding the Statements that we are posting.  You can link to the thread in the forum.  

Nancy Grace will cover the case Friday night.  If we send to her today she may have time to take a look prior to her show.



already DONE  :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Appeals on August 09, 2006, 07:08:47 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
SUGGESTION - If anyone has the time, it would be a good idea to EMAIL Nancy Grace regarding the Statements that we are posting.  You can link to the thread in the forum.  

Nancy Grace will cover the case Friday night.  If we send to her today she may have time to take a look prior to her show.


Nancy Grace's email contact:

http://www.courttv.com/contact/nancy_grace/index.html


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: blah on August 09, 2006, 07:09:21 PM
Quote from: "San"
Just to add a little regarding the work that was done on Deepak's car.  My nephew happened to walk in the house and I show him the part of Deepak's statement about his car.  My nephew does the exact kind of work that Deepak is talking about.  I asked him for his comments and he said the following:

Automotive carpet is formed to the contour of the car and is not glued down it is held in place by the seats and door sill plates. Also there is no reason to remove the carpet to run wires. Even in the most expensive systems there is no reason to remove the carpet.  In order to remove the carpet you must remove the front and rear seats and center console.  Also if you have the same make/model car all the parts are interchangeable.


I am an automotive engineer (over 14 years now) and I agree with your nephew.  Also, there is no reason to use "sealant" as Deepak says unless they are replacing a portion of the floor pan (a section of the sheet metal under the carpet)  Interesting that he says he doesnt know if previous owne had any accidents.  Could a portion of the floor pan have been replaced in Deepaks car?  This would be the only way to truley get rid of any DNA evidence as there are many areas under the carpet that could hold dna evidence.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on August 09, 2006, 07:09:38 PM
Gunslinger, regarding Robert Benson's employer, Sunfreak2 found the article that said the shop was in Cura Cabay, which is in the San Nicholas area.  

I do not think the Big Twin Harley place in Oranjestad is it.  

Sorry if someone has already pointed this out.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: robots on August 09, 2006, 07:10:02 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "robots"
WHERE ARE THE SHOES ???


"Every time we (Deepak, Freddy) asked him about the shoes, he did not answer".

This quote from Deepak comes from Tuesday, the 1st week. If true, it opens up the possibility of NO BEACH at all. Deepak and Freddy already know at this point that Joran left her at the beach. Why would Joran be reluctant to tell them that his shoes were left there also?



because he GOT them DIRTY when he was looking for an BANDONED SEPTIC tank


Title: Lying In Aruba, but Not on the Beach
Post by: LilPuma on August 09, 2006, 07:10:35 PM
Quote from: "Frijole"

And what Arlene's ARROGANT SELF did not understand is that we Americans aren't stupid.  We might not have understood their "system" before but we sure caught on... it's the old "buddy buddy" system.

She taught us well and wouldn't it be ironic if her own nightly briefings on how Aruban Law works is what finally fries these aholes?  (i.e. witnesses cannot lie)  Frankly I don't care if they go to jail for simply lying.. they shouldn't be walking the streets and getting paid money for being arrested.


That's what Joran said kept him in jail all summer.  I think it was in the ACA interview that he said he deserved to spend the summer in jail because he lied.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: blah on August 09, 2006, 07:13:05 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "San"
Just to add a little regarding the work that was done on Deepak's car.  My nephew happened to walk in the house and I show him the part of Deepak's statement about his car.  My nephew does the exact kind of work that Deepak is talking about.  I asked him for his comments and he said the following:

Automotive carpet is formed to the contour of the car and is not glued down it is held in place by the seats and door sill plates. Also there is no reason to remove the carpet to run wires. Even in the most expensive systems there is no reason to remove the carpet.  In order to remove the carpet you must remove the front and rear seats and center console.  Also if you have the same make/model car all the parts are interchangeable.


I am an automotive engineer (over 14 years now) and I agree with your nephew.  Also, there is no reason to use "sealant" as Deepak says unless they are replacing a portion of the floor pan (a section of the sheet metal under the carpet)  Interesting that he says he doesnt know if previous owne had any accidents.  Could a portion of the floor pan have been replaced in Deepaks car?  This would be the only way to truley get rid of any DNA evidence as there are many areas under the carpet that could hold dna evidence.


maybe they used this "glue and sealants" to cover any trace evidence?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Appeals on August 09, 2006, 07:13:17 PM
Also have emailed N. Grace.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on August 09, 2006, 07:13:33 PM
INTERESTING POINTS:

Cups and lots of cups by all parties, white car, Automotive Industries, frequent urination, shoes and "all that shit".

Those above-noted items seem to be key.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on August 09, 2006, 07:14:41 PM
Quote from: "Appeals"
Also have emailed N. Grace.


I have been missing you.  Good to see you back with us.  Hope all is well.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Appeals on August 09, 2006, 07:16:16 PM
On 1/15/06 at 4:30 pm "Anonymous" said:

Not long ago, a car mechanic who was killed inside a storage trailer, worked on the boat's outboard marine engine.  He found a piece of fabric and some sea animals (human remains?) stuck in the input sea water cooler tube at the back of the  propeller shaft stem.  He was talking about it when he was cleaning the  engine shaft.  

This note was from Michelle Said So Blog.  I think I posted this comment long time ago but it was lost because of crash.  Reposting because we have so many new members.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on August 09, 2006, 07:16:23 PM
Quote from: "Smish"
Quote from: "San"
Just to add a little regarding the work that was done on Deepak's car.  My nephew happened to walk in the house and I show him the part of Deepak's statement about his car.  My nephew does the exact kind of work that Deepak is talking about.  I asked him for his comments and he said the following:

Automotive carpet is formed to the contour of the car and is not glued down it is held in place by the seats and door sill plates. Also there is no reason to remove the carpet to run wires. Even in the most expensive systems there is no reason to remove the carpet.  In order to remove the carpet you must remove the front and rear seats and center console.  Also if you have the same make/model car all the parts are interchangeable.

 :cry: Hmmmm,very interesting,also very interesting that Deepak even brought this up as it is now a obvious lie.Why make up a lie if you don't HAVE to?I think he got the carpet and some other parts of his car switched out....they may have had Natalee's blood or other DNA on them.


I think the whole car was switched out from one with tinted windows to one without tinted windows.  The muffler & DVD's & stereo being added too.  Easier to switch out the whole car then to try to make sure every hair, every skin cell, every last drop of blood or DNA is out of the car.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: oldfart on August 09, 2006, 07:17:11 PM
Quote from: "San"
Just to add a little regarding the work that was done on Deepak's car.  My nephew happened to walk in the house and I show him the part of Deepak's statement about his car.  My nephew does the exact kind of work that Deepak is talking about.  I asked him for his comments and he said the following:

Automotive carpet is formed to the contour of the car and is not glued down it is held in place by the seats and door sill plates. Also there is no reason to remove the carpet to run wires. Even in the most expensive systems there is no reason to remove the carpet.  In order to remove the carpet you must remove the front and rear seats and center console.  Also if you have the same make/model car all the parts are interchangeable.


San
Your nephew is correct that you do not have to remove the carpet..
and standard auto is molded to the model of the car..

Many, many, many  years ago I helped a friend install NON automotive carpet into his 65  Galaxy.  We had to use contact cement to get the carpet to conform to the floor contour.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Appeals on August 09, 2006, 07:17:42 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Appeals"
Also have emailed N. Grace.


I have been missing you.  Good to see you back with us.  Hope all is well.


Thank you Tyler.  Good to be back.  All is well is a relative term.  Certainly my life is a lot easier than a lot of my monkey friends.  Thank you for your kind concern.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Shizaru on August 09, 2006, 07:18:25 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "robots"
WHERE ARE THE SHOES ???


"Every time we (Deepak, Freddy) asked him about the shoes, he did not answer".

This quote from Deepak comes from Tuesday, the 1st week. If true, it opens up the possibility of NO BEACH at all. Deepak and Freddy already know at this point that Joran left her at the beach. Why would Joran be reluctant to tell them that his shoes were left there also?


The statement says they weren't asking him where the shoes were, they were asking him why he had left them there.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on August 09, 2006, 07:19:25 PM
Quote from: "Appeals"
On 1/15/06 at 4:30 pm "Anonymous" said:

Not long ago, a car mechanic who was killed inside a storage trailer, worked on the boat's outboard marine engine.  He found a piece of fabric and some sea animals (human remains?) stuck in the input sea water cooler tube at the back of the  propeller shaft stem.  He was talking about it when he was cleaning the  engine shaft.  

This note was from Michelle Said So Blog.  I think I posted this comment long time ago but it was lost because of crash.  Reposting because we have so many new members.


Who's boat is anonymous referring to?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Appeals on August 09, 2006, 07:19:49 PM
Quote from: SunFreak2
Quote from: Smish
Quote from: "San"
I think the whole car was switched out from one with tinted windows to one without tinted windows.  The muffler & DVD's & stereo being added too.  Easier to switch out the whole car then to try to make sure every hair, every skin cell, every last drop of blood or DNA is out of the car.


This line of thinking is very interesting to me.  Anyone have any idea of how VIN numbers could be obtained?  Vain hope, I guess.  That would track it for sure if there was a switch.  Just thinking out loud.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on August 09, 2006, 07:20:58 PM
LOW PROFILE, KEY PLAYERS/WHAT IS THEIR PART?

Mickey John, Abraham Jones, Guido Wever, Lorenzo VR, Robert Benson, the beheaded refinery worker, a bartender known as Pitbull and Freddy.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: A's Fever on August 09, 2006, 07:21:42 PM
Quote from: "Katysmom"
Quote from: "Smish"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
KLAASEN, what is the date of the rush to the courthouse where JR inserts herself into this, after summoning Jug & Beth to let her ride with them to the courthouse.  I have it from a 6/13/05 article, but not sure that is the date of the occurrence.


I believe it was June 13th.

But wait,When renHO went with the family to the courthouse wasn't this because renHO said they had Nat's body there?If so,then a body was reported twice?


Wouldn't it seem strange that they would take a body to a courthouse and not a hospital, morgue, or coroner's office?


It seems like a diversionary tactic because the family was getting too close.  They had to throw the family off the track and move the body to a secure location when they knew the family would be diverted.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Shizaru on August 09, 2006, 07:21:54 PM
Can someone post that photo that shows the whole M beach area from FH on the left side to teh Marriott on the right including the roads?

And where exactly is Bubali and why woudl the trio have been interviewed there? I'm guessing it's near the K2 home?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Appeals on August 09, 2006, 07:22:01 PM
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
Quote from: "Appeals"
On 1/15/06 at 4:30 pm "Anonymous" said:

Not long ago, a car mechanic who was killed inside a storage trailer, worked on the boat's outboard marine engine.  He found a piece of fabric and some sea animals (human remains?) stuck in the input sea water cooler tube at the back of the  propeller shaft stem.  He was talking about it when he was cleaning the  engine shaft.  

This note was from Michelle Said So Blog.  I think I posted this comment long time ago but it was lost because of crash.  Reposting because we have so many new members.


Who's boat is anonymous referring to?


Unfortunately I have no way to tell because that was the only post I could find that referred to this at that time.  It would not have to necessarily be the perp's boat used IMO because any boat operating in the area could have sucked anything in.(?)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: blah on August 09, 2006, 07:23:34 PM
Quote from: "oldfart"
Quote from: "San"
Just to add a little regarding the work that was done on Deepak's car.  My nephew happened to walk in the house and I show him the part of Deepak's statement about his car.  My nephew does the exact kind of work that Deepak is talking about.  I asked him for his comments and he said the following:

Automotive carpet is formed to the contour of the car and is not glued down it is held in place by the seats and door sill plates. Also there is no reason to remove the carpet to run wires. Even in the most expensive systems there is no reason to remove the carpet.  In order to remove the carpet you must remove the front and rear seats and center console.  Also if you have the same make/model car all the parts are interchangeable.


San
Your nephew is correct that you do not have to remove the carpet..
and standard auto is molded to the model of the car..

Many, many, many  years ago I helped a friend install NON automotive carpet into his 65  Galaxy.  We had to use contact cement to get the carpet to conform to the floor contour.


very good point oldfart !!!!

If they replaced the carpet in Deepaks car to get rid of the evidence, and they used carpet that was not molded/made for the vehicle, they would have had to use ALOT of glue to get it to stay in place.

These molded carpets are not the easiest/fastest things to get ahold of, and I imagine even harder/longer to get on one happy island.  If they were in a hurry to replace the carpet, they may have just used some standard carpet you would buy at a carpet store plau ALOS of glue/sealants to hold it in place.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Shizaru on August 09, 2006, 07:24:14 PM
Isn't there a statement by Joran missing here?  There should be one before the June 13 statement, where he claims 2K dropped him off at his home and drove off with Natalee


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: igsigs on August 09, 2006, 07:25:24 PM
Quote from: "Shizaru"

The statement says they weren't asking him where the shoes were, they were asking him why he had left them there.

Thanks Shiz. I reread that part. All these statements after months of nothing has me on information overload.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: blah on August 09, 2006, 07:26:07 PM
Quote from: "blah"


very good point oldfart !!!!

If they replaced the carpet in Deepaks car to get rid of the evidence, and they used carpet that was not molded/made for the vehicle, they would have had to use ALOT of glue to get it to stay in place.

These molded carpets are not the easiest/fastest things to get ahold of, and I imagine even harder/longer to get on one happy island.  If they were in a hurry to replace the carpet, they may have just used some standard carpet you would buy at a carpet store plus ALOT of glue/sealants to hold it in place.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: blah on August 09, 2006, 07:30:02 PM
"It happened twice that someone spilled a drink in my car. Once it was a 'Cherry Coke" that spilled on the seat on the passenger side and where the hand break is. That happened when I was with my brother. The other time someone bumped/crashed into my car from the back while I was holding a "whisky Coke". It fell between my legs, on the seat on the passenger side and on the carpet on the floor at the passenger side.

To your question whether the girl threw up/vomited in my car, I can say the following. The girl did not throw up in my car.

**can mean both things with/to, without more context unable to say whether it is the one or the other.

To your question whether anyone has has ever thrown up in my car, I can say the following.

Nobody has ever thrown up/vomited in my car. "


So, where did the chocolate come from?  He recalls everytime anyone has ever spilled/dropped anything in his car, but no mention of chocolate.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Frijole on August 09, 2006, 07:31:57 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "oldfart"
Quote from: "San"
Just to add a little regarding the work that was done on Deepak's car.  My nephew happened to walk in the house and I show him the part of Deepak's statement about his car.  My nephew does the exact kind of work that Deepak is talking about.  I asked him for his comments and he said the following:

Automotive carpet is formed to the contour of the car and is not glued down it is held in place by the seats and door sill plates. Also there is no reason to remove the carpet to run wires. Even in the most expensive systems there is no reason to remove the carpet.  In order to remove the carpet you must remove the front and rear seats and center console.  Also if you have the same make/model car all the parts are interchangeable.


San
Your nephew is correct that you do not have to remove the carpet..
and standard auto is molded to the model of the car..

Many, many, many  years ago I helped a friend install NON automotive carpet into his 65  Galaxy.  We had to use contact cement to get the carpet to conform to the floor contour.


very good point oldfart !!!!

If they replaced the carpet in Deepaks car to get rid of the evidence, and they used carpet that was not molded/made for the vehicle, they would have had to use ALOT of glue to get it to stay in place.

These molded carpets are not the easiest/fastest things to get ahold of, and I imagine even harder/longer to get on one happy island.  If they were in a hurry to replace the carpet, they may have just used some standard carpet you would buy at a carpet store plau ALOS of glue/sealants to hold it in place.



Bingo!!!!!!!!!! Someone needs to send this one to the family... it's a keeper.  Good teamwork.  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: oldfart on August 09, 2006, 07:32:55 PM
Quote from: "Shizaru"
Can someone post that photo that shows the whole M beach area from FH on the left side to teh Marriott on the right including the roads?

And where exactly is Bubali and why woudl the trio have been interviewed there? I'm guessing it's near the K2 home?


decent Maps at http://arubayp.com/mappages.html?PageNumber=1
but you have to use next to see the next map and record the url #
they do not have hot links


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Frijole on August 09, 2006, 07:34:21 PM
Quote from: "blah"
"It happened twice that someone spilled a drink in my car. Once it was a 'Cherry Coke" that spilled on the seat on the passenger side and where the hand break is. That happened when I was with my brother. The other time someone bumped/crashed into my car from the back while I was holding a "whisky Coke". It fell between my legs, on the seat on the passenger side and on the carpet on the floor at the passenger side.

To your question whether the girl threw up/vomited in my car, I can say the following. The girl did not throw up in my car.

**can mean both things with/to, without more context unable to say whether it is the one or the other.

To your question whether anyone has has ever thrown up in my car, I can say the following.

Nobody has ever thrown up/vomited in my car. "


So, where did the chocolate come from?  He recalls everytime anyone has ever spilled/dropped anything in his car, but no mention of chocolate.


maybe he replaced the seats?  i mean what the heh... if he did, he wouldn't know that someone had had a chocolate fest in it.  But if he did know it, I guarantee you  - he wouldn't have bought the car... ha.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: blah on August 09, 2006, 07:34:49 PM
Quote from: "Frijole"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "oldfart"
Quote from: "San"
Just to add a little regarding the work that was done on Deepak's car.  My nephew happened to walk in the house and I show him the part of Deepak's statement about his car.  My nephew does the exact kind of work that Deepak is talking about.  I asked him for his comments and he said the following:

Automotive carpet is formed to the contour of the car and is not glued down it is held in place by the seats and door sill plates. Also there is no reason to remove the carpet to run wires. Even in the most expensive systems there is no reason to remove the carpet.  In order to remove the carpet you must remove the front and rear seats and center console.  Also if you have the same make/model car all the parts are interchangeable.


San
Your nephew is correct that you do not have to remove the carpet..
and standard auto is molded to the model of the car..

Many, many, many  years ago I helped a friend install NON automotive carpet into his 65  Galaxy.  We had to use contact cement to get the carpet to conform to the floor contour.


very good point oldfart !!!!

If they replaced the carpet in Deepaks car to get rid of the evidence, and they used carpet that was not molded/made for the vehicle, they would have had to use ALOT of glue to get it to stay in place.

These molded carpets are not the easiest/fastest things to get ahold of, and I imagine even harder/longer to get on one happy island.  If they were in a hurry to replace the carpet, they may have just used some standard carpet you would buy at a carpet store plau ALOS of glue/sealants to hold it in place.



Bingo!!!!!!!!!! Someone needs to send this one to the family... it's a keeper.  Good teamwork.  :lol:


fix my dam typos first! :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Frijole on August 09, 2006, 07:36:54 PM
Blah... lmao.   :!:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on August 09, 2006, 07:38:07 PM
Quote from: "Shizaru"
Isn't there a statement by Joran missing here?  There should be one before the June 13 statement, where he claims 2K dropped him off at his home and drove off with Natalee


There is a statement prior to that, but there is no OFFICIAL statement regards the claim that K2 dropped waterhead off at his house and left with Natalee.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Terric7058 on August 09, 2006, 07:39:16 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "oldfart"
Quote from: "San"
Just to add a little regarding the work that was done on Deepak's car.  My nephew happened to walk in the house and I show him the part of Deepak's statement about his car.  My nephew does the exact kind of work that Deepak is talking about.  I asked him for his comments and he said the following:

Automotive carpet is formed to the contour of the car and is not glued down it is held in place by the seats and door sill plates. Also there is no reason to remove the carpet to run wires. Even in the most expensive systems there is no reason to remove the carpet.  In order to remove the carpet you must remove the front and rear seats and center console.  Also if you have the same make/model car all the parts are interchangeable.


San
Your nephew is correct that you do not have to remove the carpet..
and standard auto is molded to the model of the car..

Many, many, many  years ago I helped a friend install NON automotive carpet into his 65  Galaxy.  We had to use contact cement to get the carpet to conform to the floor contour.


very good point oldfart !!!!

If they replaced the carpet in Deepaks car to get rid of the evidence, and they used carpet that was not molded/made for the vehicle, they would have had to use ALOT of glue to get it to stay in place.

These molded carpets are not the easiest/fastest things to get ahold of, and I imagine even harder/longer to get on one happy island.  If they were in a hurry to replace the carpet, they may have just used some standard carpet you would buy at a carpet store plau ALOS of glue/sealants to hold it in place.


Anymore you can order these new pre molded carpets online in many places. Several come with new under padding


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: blah on August 09, 2006, 07:40:06 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Shizaru"
Isn't there a statement by Joran missing here?  There should be one before the June 13 statement, where he claims 2K dropped him off at his home and drove off with Natalee


There is a statement prior to that, but there is no OFFICIAL statement regards the claim that K2 dropped waterhead off at his house and left with Natalee.



waterhead

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
oh dam, thats funny
waterhead


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: oldfart on August 09, 2006, 07:42:47 PM
Gota run for a bit..

If anyone comes up with even a partial answer to my ? on page 8
as to the date Deepak was summoned to the police station at Bubali
I would love to know..

I have a gut feeling this it was within 2 days of Natalee being missing.
We know they made statements within the 1st few days

TIA

SeeeYaaByeee


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: blah on August 09, 2006, 07:43:44 PM
Quote from: "Terric7058"

Anymore you can order these new pre molded carpets online in many places. Several come with new under padding


for classic cars that are being restored, yes you can order one online.

but a newer honda civic in Aruba?  You cant just run up to the autoparts store and pick this up. Do you have a website?  How long would it take to get one for Deepaks car?  They didnt have much time to take care of this.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Shizaru on August 09, 2006, 07:43:54 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Shizaru"
Isn't there a statement by Joran missing here?  There should be one before the June 13 statement, where he claims 2K dropped him off at his home and drove off with Natalee


There is a statement prior to that, but there is no OFFICIAL statement regards the claim that K2 dropped waterhead off at his house and left with Natalee.


The statement shoud be from June 11 I think.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: blah on August 09, 2006, 07:45:02 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "Terric7058"

Anymore you can order these new pre molded carpets online in many places. Several come with new under padding


for classic cars that are being restored, yes you can order one online.

but a newer honda civic in Aruba?  You cant just run up to the autoparts store and pick this up. Do you have a website?  How long would it take to get one for Deepaks car?  They didnt have much time to take care of this.


also, you wouldnt have to use "alot of glue and sealants" for one of these premolded ones.  As a matter of fact, you do not need ANY glue at all.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Shizaru on August 09, 2006, 07:47:16 PM
Quote from: "oldfart"
Gota run for a bit..

If anyone comes up with even a partial answer to my ? on page 8
as to the date Deepak was summoned to the police station at Bubali
I would love to know..

I have a gut feeling this it was within 2 days of Natalee being missing.
We know they made statements within the 1st few days

TIA

SeeeYaaByeee


Think it was May 31 or June 1.  

I have a work in progress timeline for statement info here (wish I could do it on here too but no edit option:

http://blogsfornatalee.com/forums/index.php?topic=4534.0


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on August 09, 2006, 07:48:43 PM
WATERSHED MOMENT:  Following the statement that was retracted on 6/11/06.  What happened?  The K2 and J2 seem to be dividing and the glue used in the automobile is no longer coalescing their stories.  In fact, the stories are falling apart, mutating and like amoebas, changing and dividing constantly.

Within days, a man is beheaded.  What happened that involved this man?  What happened that made Joran so sure the body would never be found and he could go on the offensive rather than defensive.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on August 09, 2006, 07:49:26 PM
Quote from: "blah"

So, where did the chocolate come from?  He recalls everytime anyone has ever spilled/dropped anything in his car, but no mention of chocolate.


 :shock:   Great point!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on August 09, 2006, 07:50:45 PM
Quote from: "Shizaru"
Quote from: "oldfart"
Gota run for a bit..

If anyone comes up with even a partial answer to my ? on page 8
as to the date Deepak was summoned to the police station at Bubali
I would love to know..

I have a gut feeling this it was within 2 days of Natalee being missing.
We know they made statements within the 1st few days

TIA

SeeeYaaByeee


Think it was May 31 or June 1.  

I have a work in progress timeline for statement info here (wish I could do it on here too but no edit option:

http://blogsfornatalee.com/forums/index.php?topic=4534.0


Is it because I am and old and forgetful or because I think I recall Paulus took the Sporter and the K2 into a police station the morning (daylight time) following the visit upon the Sloot household.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Frijole on August 09, 2006, 07:50:53 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
WATERSHED MOMENT:  Following the statement that was retracted on 6/11/06.  What happened?  The K2 and J2 seem to be dividing and the glue used in the automobile is no longer coalescing their stories.  In fact, the stories are falling apart, mutating and like amoebas, changing and dividing constantly.

Within days, a man is beheaded.  What happened that involved this man?  What happened that made Joran so sure the body would never be found and he could go on the offensive rather than defensive.


They got rid of the body and the person(s) that got rid of the body.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Appeals on August 09, 2006, 07:53:05 PM
Quote from: "oldfart"
Gota run for a bit..

If anyone comes up with even a partial answer to my ? on page 8
as to the date Deepak was summoned to the police station at Bubali
I would love to know..

I have a gut feeling this it was within 2 days of Natalee being missing.
We know they made statements within the 1st few days

TIA

SeeeYaaByeee


I don't know if it is a partial answer or not, but on 6/3 CNN reported..."there were three people that they talked to..And those three individuals are on the island.  they were spoken to once by officials -- interviewed.  And we understand, according to some of our sources there that they have been called back for a second interview" ...

Also, on 6/3 SAMBO stated the police questioned and released three aruban classmates who said they dropped Holloway off early Monday...

So obviously by Friday 6/3, the 5th day after May 29, they were already bringing them in for a second interview.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on August 09, 2006, 07:53:07 PM
Quote from: "Frijole"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
WATERSHED MOMENT:  Following the statement that was retracted on 6/11/06.  What happened?  The K2 and J2 seem to be dividing and the glue used in the automobile is no longer coalescing their stories.  In fact, the stories are falling apart, mutating and like amoebas, changing and dividing constantly.

Within days, a man is beheaded.  What happened that involved this man?  What happened that made Joran so sure the body would never be found and he could go on the offensive rather than defensive.


They got rid of the body and the person(s) that got rid of the body.


Don't forget that June 11th is also the date that the aru-bay Rock videos were uploaded.  June 10-13 there is alot of activity, IMO


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: blah on August 09, 2006, 07:53:25 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
WATERSHED MOMENT:  Following the statement that was retracted on 6/11/06.  What happened?  The K2 and J2 seem to be dividing and the glue used in the automobile is no longer coalescing their stories.  In fact, the stories are falling apart, mutating and like amoebas, changing and dividing constantly.

Within days, a man is beheaded.  What happened that involved this man?  What happened that made Joran so sure the body would never be found and he could go on the offensive rather than defensive.


what day were the 2 security guards released?  Maybe the retracted "confession and the suspect is leading us to the body" was supposed to be from one of the security guards but someone didnt get the memo that there was a change of plans.  Then they had to retract that statement because Beth pretty much cleared them.

It seems that K2's and Joran turning on each other sort of coincides with the 2 security guards frame-up falling through doesnt it?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: ala_gunslinger on August 09, 2006, 07:55:15 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "San"
Just to add a little regarding the work that was done on Deepak's car.  My nephew happened to walk in the house and I show him the part of Deepak's statement about his car.  My nephew does the exact kind of work that Deepak is talking about.  I asked him for his comments and he said the following:

Automotive carpet is formed to the contour of the car and is not glued down it is held in place by the seats and door sill plates. Also there is no reason to remove the carpet to run wires. Even in the most expensive systems there is no reason to remove the carpet.  In order to remove the carpet you must remove the front and rear seats and center console.  Also if you have the same make/model car all the parts are interchangeable.


I am an automotive engineer (over 14 years now) and I agree with your nephew.  Also, there is no reason to use "sealant" as Deepak says unless they are replacing a portion of the floor pan (a section of the sheet metal under the carpet)  Interesting that he says he doesnt know if previous owne had any accidents.  Could a portion of the floor pan have been replaced in Deepaks car?  This would be the only way to truley get rid of any DNA evidence as there are many areas under the carpet that could hold dna evidence.


Does 'no way in hell would they do this, because if this happened the car would be totalled' work for you?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: ala_gunslinger on August 09, 2006, 07:56:35 PM
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
Quote from: "blah"

So, where did the chocolate come from?  He recalls everytime anyone has ever spilled/dropped anything in his car, but no mention of chocolate.


 :shock:   Great point!!


Because it came from another car!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: A's Fever on August 09, 2006, 07:56:53 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
WATERSHED MOMENT:  Following the statement that was retracted on 6/11/06.  What happened?  The K2 and J2 seem to be dividing and the glue used in the automobile is no longer coalescing their stories.  In fact, the stories are falling apart, mutating and like amoebas, changing and dividing constantly.

Within days, a man is beheaded.  What happened that involved this man?  What happened that made Joran so sure the body would never be found and he could go on the offensive rather than defensive.


what day were the 2 security guards released?  Maybe the retracted "confession and the suspect is leading us to the body" was supposed to be from one of the security guards but someone didnt get the memo that there was a change of plans.  Then they had to retract that statement because Beth pretty much cleared them.

It seems that K2's and Joran turning on each other sort of coincides with the 2 security guards frame-up falling through doesnt it?


Now that is an interesting thought, Blah.  I had always assumed that the confession was made by Joran or the Kalpoes, but you might be on to something.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: ala_gunslinger on August 09, 2006, 07:58:36 PM
Quote from: "ala_gunslinger"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "San"
Just to add a little regarding the work that was done on Deepak's car.  My nephew happened to walk in the house and I show him the part of Deepak's statement about his car.  My nephew does the exact kind of work that Deepak is talking about.  I asked him for his comments and he said the following:

Automotive carpet is formed to the contour of the car and is not glued down it is held in place by the seats and door sill plates. Also there is no reason to remove the carpet to run wires. Even in the most expensive systems there is no reason to remove the carpet.  In order to remove the carpet you must remove the front and rear seats and center console.  Also if you have the same make/model car all the parts are interchangeable.


I am an automotive engineer (over 14 years now) and I agree with your nephew.  Also, there is no reason to use "sealant" as Deepak says unless they are replacing a portion of the floor pan (a section of the sheet metal under the carpet)  Interesting that he says he doesnt know if previous owne had any accidents.  Could a portion of the floor pan have been replaced in Deepaks car?  This would be the only way to truley get rid of any DNA evidence as there are many areas under the carpet that could hold dna evidence.


Does 'no way in hell would they do this, because if this happened the car would be totalled' work for you?


I'm sorry blah, maybe I was not clear.  THe only reason for getting rid of this is to attempt to destroy dna present on the floor pan.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: ala_gunslinger on August 09, 2006, 07:59:35 PM
Late ya'll!   I got bubba burgers on the grill!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: blah on August 09, 2006, 08:03:39 PM
Quote from: "ala_gunslinger"

I'm sorry blah, maybe I was not clear.  THe only reason for getting rid of this is to attempt to destroy dna present on the floor pan.


anyway you look at it, i doubt part of the floorpan was replaced - too much work.  If anything, the reason for all the glue and sealants would have been to make a carpet work that was not molded specifically for Deepaks car.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Anna on August 09, 2006, 08:06:55 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "San"
Just to add a little regarding the work that was done on Deepak's car.  My nephew happened to walk in the house and I show him the part of Deepak's statement about his car.  My nephew does the exact kind of work that Deepak is talking about.  I asked him for his comments and he said the following:

Automotive carpet is formed to the contour of the car and is not glued down it is held in place by the seats and door sill plates. Also there is no reason to remove the carpet to run wires. Even in the most expensive systems there is no reason to remove the carpet.  In order to remove the carpet you must remove the front and rear seats and center console.  Also if you have the same make/model car all the parts are interchangeable.


I am an automotive engineer (over 14 years now) and I agree with your nephew.  Also, there is no reason to use "sealant" as Deepak says unless they are replacing a portion of the floor pan (a section of the sheet metal under the carpet)  Interesting that he says he doesnt know if previous owne had any accidents.  Could a portion of the floor pan have been replaced in Deepaks car?  This would be the only way to truley get rid of any DNA evidence as there are many areas under the carpet that could hold dna evidence.


maybe they used this "glue and sealants" to cover any trace evidence?



The above is the most likely scenario although I tend to believe the back seat and headliner might have also been replaced.  No way to know of those as probably do not require the glue.

As for replacing the entire car, even in Aruba cars are likely registered using the VIN number.  This is put on various parts and places throughout cars these days as an anti-theft, stripping precaution and it is just about impossible to remove all the different places a VIN (Vehicle Identification Number given by the manufacturer) in all these nooks and crannies.  That is the point of putting them there and in places one cannot access without taking the motor apart, etc.

For this reason I do not think it would have been possible to switch out the entire car.  Blah would probably know about this as would other posters.  You could never find let alone chance all the VIN numbers on the average car without a great deal of trouble and time.

JMO

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: blah on August 09, 2006, 08:12:09 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "San"
Just to add a little regarding the work that was done on Deepak's car.  My nephew happened to walk in the house and I show him the part of Deepak's statement about his car.  My nephew does the exact kind of work that Deepak is talking about.  I asked him for his comments and he said the following:

Automotive carpet is formed to the contour of the car and is not glued down it is held in place by the seats and door sill plates. Also there is no reason to remove the carpet to run wires. Even in the most expensive systems there is no reason to remove the carpet.  In order to remove the carpet you must remove the front and rear seats and center console.  Also if you have the same make/model car all the parts are interchangeable.


I am an automotive engineer (over 14 years now) and I agree with your nephew.  Also, there is no reason to use "sealant" as Deepak says unless they are replacing a portion of the floor pan (a section of the sheet metal under the carpet)  Interesting that he says he doesnt know if previous owne had any accidents.  Could a portion of the floor pan have been replaced in Deepaks car?  This would be the only way to truley get rid of any DNA evidence as there are many areas under the carpet that could hold dna evidence.


maybe they used this "glue and sealants" to cover any trace evidence?



The above is the most likely scenario although I tend to believe the back seat and headliner might have also been replaced.  No way to know of those as probably do not require the glue.

As for replacing the entire car, even in Aruba cars are likely registered using the VIN number.  This is put on various parts and places throughout cars these days as an anti-theft, stripping precaution and it is just about impossible to remove all the different places a VIN (Vehicle Identification Number given by the manufacturer) in all these nooks and crannies.  That is the point of putting them there and in places one cannot access without taking the motor apart, etc.

For this reason I do not think it would have been possible to switch out the entire car.  Blah would probably know about this as would other posters.  You could never find let alone chance all the VIN numbers on the average car without a great deal of trouble and time.

JMO

.


you are correct, last time i checked, it was over 100 places.  Also, there are special rivets that hold the VIN plate to the dashboard in the lower left(drivers side) corner of the windshield.   Only auto manufacturers and people who steal these rivets from auto manufacterers can get their hands on these rivets.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: sandy leiva on August 09, 2006, 08:15:59 PM
hhi monkeys
ifound this article at todays diario paper under local section

SUCESONAN

Daño na turismo! MUCHANAN ENVOLVI DEN ATRACO RIBA TURISTA

ORANJESTAD (AAN): Recientemente un grupo di hoben a atraca un turista, y esaki a socede na altura di un Highrise Hotel.  E grupo anti social a ranca tas di turista, pero e biaha aki si guardianan di seguridad a reacciona y a logra gara un di e sospechosonan.

   Segun e informe cu lo tabata  trata di un total di 5 mucha, kendenan ta meti den e caso.   Awor cu Recherche tin un di nan deteni, di cual su inicialnan ta W.M. di 20 aña.

HOMBER KIER PA HENDENAN


translation
Ruining our tourism.  Group of youngsters involved in beting up tourist!
(Ornasjestad AAN) recently a group of younsters beat a turist.  This occured in the hights of Highrise Hotel. This group of antisocials then ran after the tourist, however the security guards working there was able to chase and catch one of the youngsters
  According to the information gained it involved 5 youths, all together in this case. W.M. a twenty yr old male was detained.  


  My notes when i tried to click on this article to see if there was more on the case it kept saying this page no longer visible. that is all the info stated in todays diario  wed aug 8 2006 under local info posts.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on August 09, 2006, 08:18:21 PM
ALE reported that there was blood in Deepak's car, but that turned out to be chocolate & cleaning fluid.  There was also no trace evidence of Natalee ever being in that car.  No hair, no skin cells, no fingerprints, etc.  The only way we know she was in a silver Honda was b/c of the MB kids.

I'm sorry but I don't believe that Deepak was able to get every drop of blood, hair, etc out of his car.  That would take a lot of time, special equipment and be very conspicuous.  Either he had professional help, ALE fudged samples & results, or there was a different car.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Appeals on August 09, 2006, 08:19:59 PM
Only from memory, but weren't the SG's released June 17th?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on August 09, 2006, 08:20:04 PM
Quote from: "sandy leiva"
hhi monkeys
ifound this article at todays diario paper under local section

SUCESONAN

Daño na turismo! MUCHANAN ENVOLVI DEN ATRACO RIBA TURISTA

ORANJESTAD (AAN): Recientemente un grupo di hoben a atraca un turista, y esaki a socede na altura di un Highrise Hotel.  E grupo anti social a ranca tas di turista, pero e biaha aki si guardianan di seguridad a reacciona y a logra gara un di e sospechosonan.

   Segun e informe cu lo tabata  trata di un total di 5 mucha, kendenan ta meti den e caso.   Awor cu Recherche tin un di nan deteni, di cual su inicialnan ta W.M. di 20 aña.

HOMBER KIER PA HENDENAN


translation
Ruining our tourism.  Group of youngsters involved in beting up tourist!
(Ornasjestad AAN) recently a group of younsters beat a turist.  This occured in the hights of Highrise Hotel. This group of antisocials then ran after the tourist, however the security guards working there was able to chase and catch one of the youngsters
  According to the information gained it involved 5 youths, all together in this case. W.M. a twenty yr old male was detained.  


  My notes when i tried to click on this article to see if there was more on the case it kept saying this page no longer visible. that is all the info stated in todays diario  wed aug 8 2006 under local info posts.


Thanks Sandy - I saw it and gathered what it was about but since I don't read Pap, I wasn't sure.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on August 09, 2006, 08:21:05 PM
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
ALE reported that there was blood in Deepak's car, but that turned out to be chocolate & cleaning fluid.  There was also no trace evidence of Natalee ever being in that car.  No hair, no skin cells, no fingerprints, etc.  The only way we know she was in a silver Honda was b/c of the MB kids.

I'm sorry but I don't believe that Deepak was able to get every drop of blood, hair, etc out of his car.  That would take a lot of time, special equipment and be very conspicuous.  Either he had professional help, ALE fudged samples & results, or there was a different car.


I vote for different car, or at least the car samples sent to the Netherlands and the FBI were from a different car.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Appeals on August 09, 2006, 08:21:39 PM
Sand in the hour glass of computer time has run out.  Carry on monkeys.  You're doing great as usual.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on August 09, 2006, 08:22:41 PM
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
ALE reported that there was blood in Deepak's car, but that turned out to be chocolate & cleaning fluid.  There was also no trace evidence of Natalee ever being in that car.  No hair, no skin cells, no fingerprints, etc.  The only way we know she was in a silver Honda was b/c of the MB kids.

I'm sorry but I don't believe that Deepak was able to get every drop of blood, hair, etc out of his car.  That would take a lot of time, special equipment and be very conspicuous.  Either he had professional help, ALE fudged samples & results, or there was a different car.


I always believe cars were traded out.  ALE probably never checked VIN numbers or registration plates on either car, just took their word for it because they knew it was a cover-up and they took the path of least resistance.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on August 09, 2006, 08:23:10 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
WATERSHED MOMENT:  Following the statement that was retracted on 6/11/06.  What happened?  The K2 and J2 seem to be dividing and the glue used in the automobile is no longer coalescing their stories.  In fact, the stories are falling apart, mutating and like amoebas, changing and dividing constantly.

Within days, a man is beheaded.  What happened that involved this man?  What happened that made Joran so sure the body would never be found and he could go on the offensive rather than defensive.


what day were the 2 security guards released?  Maybe the retracted "confession and the suspect is leading us to the body" was supposed to be from one of the security guards but someone didnt get the memo that there was a change of plans.  Then they had to retract that statement because Beth pretty much cleared them.

It seems that K2's and Joran turning on each other sort of coincides with the 2 security guards frame-up falling through doesnt it?


The timeline posted by Sunfreak2 on page 5 or 6 of this thread says they were released on 6/13....same day that van der Straaten questoned Joran....mmmmm..

Great thining, blah.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on August 09, 2006, 08:24:12 PM
BLAH

great thinking there, squirrely as a fox.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on August 09, 2006, 08:24:25 PM
Great thinKing, blah...no edit button.... :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: blah on August 09, 2006, 08:30:14 PM
Quote from: "Appeals"
Only from memory, but weren't the SG's released June 17th?


I thought it was the 12th, i'm pretty sure it was a Sunday.  For no apparent reaso  - they were held a few extra days even after it was known that they had nothing to do with the case too.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: San on August 09, 2006, 08:32:00 PM
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
ALE reported that there was blood in Deepak's car, but that turned out to be chocolate & cleaning fluid.  There was also no trace evidence of Natalee ever being in that car.  No hair, no skin cells, no fingerprints, etc.  The only way we know she was in a silver Honda was b/c of the MB kids.

I'm sorry but I don't believe that Deepak was able to get every drop of blood, hair, etc out of his car.  That would take a lot of time, special equipment and be very conspicuous.  Either he had professional help, ALE fudged samples & results, or there was a different car.

Could quite possibly be all three.  We have the highest people in the government involved in this coverup.  They can make anything happen.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on August 09, 2006, 08:35:50 PM
Aruba releases two security guards
Had been held in case of missing teen

Monday, June 13, 2005 Posted: 11:32 PM EDT (0332 GMT)
   

ORANJESTAD, Aruba (CNN) -- Authorities in Aruba have released two security guards arrested in the disappearance of an Alabama teen late last month.

Abraham Jones, 28, and Mickey John, 30, who work at a beachfront hotel near where Natalee Holloway was staying, were arrested in the case on June 5 but were never charged.

Holloway, 18, was discovered missing May 30. Three men remain in custody in the case -- none of them formally charged as yet.

Police have identified the three men still in custody as brothers Satish Kalpoe, 18, and Depak Kalpoe, 21, and their friend, Joran Van Der Sloot, 17, the son of an Aruban judge. The attorneys for each have said their client claims innocence.

The three young men told police they took Holloway to a beach after leaving an Oranjestad nightclub with her early May 30, when she was last seen. They said they returned her to her hotel not long afterward.

Holloway, from the Birmingham, Alabama, suburb of Mountain Brook, was in Aruba with classmates who were celebrating their graduation from high school.

On Sunday, law enforcement sources close to the investigation said a substance found in a Honda seized after three of the men were arrested Thursday is not blood, based on a sample analyzed at an FBI laboratory in Quantico, Virginia.

On Monday, Prime Minister Nelson Oduber said Aruba's government "is doing the utmost" to find Holloway.

"We hope that we will find Natalee Holloway alive, and are still praying that there is nothing bad that has happened to her," Oduber said Sunday.

Holloway's mother, Beth Holloway Twitty, told The Associated Press on Sunday that she believes the three young men still being held in the case "know what happened to her." She also said the two security guards should be released. (Full story)

While expressing "deep concern" over Holloway's fate, Oduber also sought to reassure the media that the island is safe for visitors, noting that more than 60 percent of Aruba's income comes from tourism and more than 45,000 Arubans work in that industry.

"That's why we make an appeal to our local press and international press that the government and everybody involved will do the job," he said.

The search for Holloway was scaled back during the weekend, with teams venturing out only after receiving credible tips and coast guard patrols off shore.

CNN's Karl Penhaul contributed to this report.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: oldfart on August 09, 2006, 08:37:37 PM
Quote from: "Shizaru"
Quote from: "oldfart"
Gota run for a bit..

If anyone comes up with even a partial answer to my ? on page 8
as to the date Deepak was summoned to the police station at Bubali
I would love to know..

I have a gut feeling this it was within 2 days of Natalee being missing.
We know they made statements within the 1st few days

TIA

SeeeYaaByeee


Think it was May 31 or June 1.  

I have a work in progress timeline for statement info here (wish I could do it on here too but no edit option:

http://blogsfornatalee.com/forums/index.php?topic=4534.0


THanks Shizaru

and from your timeline at BFN
Quote
Day before Bubali interviews (5/30 or 5/31?): Deepak vacuums his car, allegedly because Joran had almost fallen in the water, and then sat down in the car with sand on his shorts and legs  (D 6/10)


MY point is if Joran got out of the car and walked away with Natalee at the beach. and no one picked him up..   How did he get in the car with all the SAND on him?
A simple follow-up question in here MIGHT have made a big difference... but NOOOO that could not happen :twisted:  :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: blah on August 09, 2006, 08:43:19 PM
This is interesting from Deepak's statement:

"On Tuesday two weeks ago, about 19.00 hours, I went to the house of Joran. Freddie was at the house of Joran. Joran had said to me that he had told Freddie the story about the Holiday Inn and also the truth. Joran had said only Freddy because he is my best friend. I had asked Joran if he did anything with/to* the girl. Joran had told us that he did not do anything with/to* the girl and that the girl had fallen asleep on the beach and that he had left her there."

now Deepak was with Joran the next day/night after Natalee "disappears."  He is with Joran when he gets the call from Paulus that the family/police are at the house (this would have been Monday night right?)  And he goes to the van der sloot compound to meet with everyone, puts an alibi together on the way there or whatever, yet waits until 7:00pm on Tuesday to ask Joran if he did anything with/to* Natalee?  Bullshit Deepak.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on August 09, 2006, 08:50:44 PM
Sand in car from Joran... When the HT's arive at the Sloot compound and Deepak and Joran are there, there is a statment from the laywer that is with Joe T's response... there is a statement from the lawyer with information provided by Beth / Jug, etc. Joran was dressed in a casual manner and there was sand. Deepak never says that it was the Sunday night that Joran got into his vehicle and messed it up with sand.
Could have been the Monday. That is my guess.
.
Does anyone know where I can find the exact time that Beth and family / friends actually arrive at the Sloot compound ?  
.
Deepak sya he got off work at 11:10 the Monday. Satish picked him up. They went to the Kalpoe house and then Deepak went to the Radisson as he had called Joran just before he got off work. Says he got to the Radisson at midnight. And he thinks they left to go to the Wyndham at 2 ish. In the Wyndham parking lot is when he says they got the call from Paulus.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: oldfart on August 09, 2006, 08:52:33 PM
I know we have been kicking around Deepaks carpet ect...

but have to back-up just a bit  
from the his June 13th statement
Quote
To your question from whom I bought the car, I can say the following. I bought the car from a man called David GROSS. He works at a company called "Carufa". I must tell you that when they installed the sound in my car, they used a lot of glue and seal/sealant under the carpet of the car. They had to remove the carpets to pull new cables through the car. You can verify this at "Automotive Enterprises". The man who installed it is called Osman OSMAN. I don't know if anyone had an accident/car crash with this car prior to it being sold to me.


Why did Deepak volunteer all the additional information on the carpet?
He answered the question in the 1st sentence  undelined and then added all the other information unerlined in red.

Either there is a question posed that we did not get in this "document" or Deepak is maybe anticipating what the next question might relate to.

JMO


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on August 09, 2006, 08:53:25 PM
Quote from: "blah"
This is interesting from Deepak's statement:

"On Tuesday two weeks ago, about 19.00 hours, I went to the house of Joran. Freddie was at the house of Joran. Joran had said to me that he had told Freddie the story about the Holiday Inn and also the truth. Joran had said only Freddy because he is my best friend. I had asked Joran if he did anything with/to* the girl. Joran had told us that he did not do anything with/to* the girl and that the girl had fallen asleep on the beach and that he had left her there."

now Deepak was with Joran the next day/night after Natalee "disappears."  He is with Joran when he gets the call from Paulus that the family/police are at the house (this would have been Monday night right?)  And he goes to the van der sloot compound to meet with everyone, puts an alibi together on the way there or whatever, yet waits until 7:00pm on Tuesday to ask Joran if he did anything with/to* Natalee?  Bullshit Deepak.


Freddy must tell the truth.  He told Freddy the STORY ABOUT THE HI AND ALSO THE TRUTH.  (What is the truth?).  Freddy must tell the truth.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: blah on August 09, 2006, 08:56:18 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Sand in car from Joran... When the HT's arive at the Sloot compound and Deepak and Joran are there, there is a statment from the laywer that is with Joe T's response... there is a statement from the lawyer with information provided by Beth / Jug, etc. Joran was dressed in a casual manner and there was sand. Deepak never says that it was the Sunday night that Joran got into his vehicle and messed it up with sand.
Could have been the Monday. That is my guess.
.
Does anyone know where I can find the exact time that Beth and family / friends actually arrive at the Sloot compound ?  
.
Deepak sya he got off work at 11:10 the Monday. Satish picked him up. They went to the Kalpoe house and then Deepak went to the Radisson as he had called Joran just before he got off work. Says he got to the Radisson at midnight. And he thinks they left to go to the Wyndham at 2 ish. In the Wyndham parking lot is when he says they got the call from Paulus.


5:00 AM = The TWITTY’s, CROES, G. Ruffner PAGE Jr., Alberto, JODY BEARMAN, PAUL LILLY-the student chaperone, the UNITED STATES D.E.A. agent, the UNITED STATES F.B.I. agent, the CROES/TWITTY’s mutual friends, a kid who knows CROES, the kid who knows Prime Suspect JORAN VAN DER SLOOT, and 2 ARUBAN policemen arrive back at SLOOT home.

BETH and JUG TWITTY told FOX News on 7-5 that it was Current Suspect DEEPAK KALPOE (not Current Suspect SATISH KALPOE) who was with Prime Suspect JORAN VAN DER SLOOT casually leaning back against Current Suspect DEEPAK KALPOE’s “Honda” when the police pulled back up to the house at 5:00 AM on 5-31 and the meeting between the ARUBAN policemen, when the Suspects SLOOT‘s, the UNITED STATES D.E.A. agent, JODY BEARMAN, the UNITED STATES F.B.I. agent, PAUL LILLY-the student chaperone, and the TWITTY’s took place. (Current Suspect DEEPAK KALPOE, apparently, gave Prime Suspect JORAN VAN DER SLOOT a ride home from “Wyndham Hotel“ casino? Where is Current Suspect SATISH KALPOE?)

BETH and JUG TWITTY told FOX News on 7-5 that it was Current Suspect DEEPAK KALPOE (not Current Suspect SATISH KALPOE) who was with Prime Suspect JORAN VAN DER SLOOT and both Suspects were just casually leaning back against Current Suspect DEEPAK KALPOE’s “Honda” when the police pulled back up to the house at 5:00 AM on 5-31 and the meeting between the ARUBAN policemen, when the Suspects SLOOT‘s, the UNITED STATES D.E.A. agent, JODY BERMAN, PAUL LILLY-the student chaperone, and the TWITTY’s took place.

BETH stays in a car. The meeting lasts approximately 1 hour.

On 10-13 when BETH was asked if she heard any 5-31 early morning statements made by Prime Suspect JORAN VAN DER SLOOT about him sexually assaulting NATALEE, BETH replied, “That would be information that I obtained second hand. I did not hear Joran say this among the group. I was the only witness that remained in the car, but Jug has since relayed exactly what Joran had said.”


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Anna on August 09, 2006, 08:56:35 PM
Quote from: "oldfart"
I know we have been kicking around Deepaks carpet ect...

but have to back-up just a bit  
from the his June 13th statement
Quote
To your question from whom I bought the car, I can say the following. I bought the car from a man called David GROSS. He works at a company called "Carufa". I must tell you that when they installed the sound in my car, they used a lot of glue and seal/sealant under the carpet of the car. They had to remove the carpets to pull new cables through the car. You can verify this at "Automotive Enterprises". The man who installed it is called Osman OSMAN. I don't know if anyone had an accident/car crash with this car prior to it being sold to me.


Why did Deepak volunteer all the additional information on the carpet?
He answered the question in the 1st sentence  undelined and then added all the other information unerlined in red.

Either there is a question posed that we did not get in this "document" or Deepak is maybe anticipating what the next question might relate to.

JMO



OldFart,
He might be anticipating but he is supposed to state the question back in his answer to make sure he understood.  Is the method they seem to use in interrogation.  Since nothing about the added information, one would have to assume it volunteered as you say possibly in anticipation of another question.

But note each time they are required to state question back in their answer.  Very effective shortcut in transcribing I am sure.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: oldfart on August 09, 2006, 08:59:02 PM
Quote from: "blah"
This is interesting from Deepak's statement:

"On Tuesday two weeks ago, about 19.00 hours, I went to the house of Joran. Freddie was at the house of Joran. Joran had said to me that he had told Freddie the story about the Holiday Inn and also the truth. Joran had said only Freddy because he is my best friend. I had asked Joran if he did anything with/to* the girl. Joran had told us that he did not do anything with/to* the girl and that the girl had fallen asleep on the beach and that he had left her there."

now Deepak was with Joran the next day/night after Natalee "disappears."  He is with Joran when he gets the call from Paulus that the family/police are at the house (this would have been Monday night right?)  And he goes to the van der sloot compound to meet with everyone, puts an alibi together on the way there or whatever, yet waits until 7:00pm on Tuesday to ask Joran if he did anything with/to* Natalee?  Bullshit Deepak.


Blah
Now now...  now cussing...COW PIES are acceptable and maybe even this
(http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c314/OldF/d619ba60.gif)

You do not want to be in LaLa's book do you :wink:

Besides he was 21-22 at the time and when Joarn says this is the story we need to tell ......and he agrees...
YUP... we have not a clue yet as to the real truth..

JMO of course


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: blah on August 09, 2006, 08:59:56 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "blah"
This is interesting from Deepak's statement:

"On Tuesday two weeks ago, about 19.00 hours, I went to the house of Joran. Freddie was at the house of Joran. Joran had said to me that he had told Freddie the story about the Holiday Inn and also the truth. Joran had said only Freddy because he is my best friend. I had asked Joran if he did anything with/to* the girl. Joran had told us that he did not do anything with/to* the girl and that the girl had fallen asleep on the beach and that he had left her there."

now Deepak was with Joran the next day/night after Natalee "disappears."  He is with Joran when he gets the call from Paulus that the family/police are at the house (this would have been Monday night right?)  And he goes to the van der sloot compound to meet with everyone, puts an alibi together on the way there or whatever, yet waits until 7:00pm on Tuesday to ask Joran if he did anything with/to* Natalee?  Bullshit Deepak.


Freddy must tell the truth.  He told Freddy the STORY ABOUT THE HI AND ALSO THE TRUTH.  (What is the truth?).  Freddy must tell the truth.


Freddy knows the truth and could make $250 grand in 10 minutes by doing the right thing.  He would then probably be a millionaire very soon after.  Freddy - do the right thing.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: blah on August 09, 2006, 09:03:41 PM
Quote from: "oldfart"
Blah
Now now...  now cussing...COW PIES are acceptable and maybe even this
(http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c314/OldF/d619ba60.gif)

You do not want to be in LaLa's book do you :wink:

Besides he was 21-22 at the time and when Joarn says this is the story we need to tell ......and he agrees...
YUP... we have not a clue yet as to the real truth..

JMO of course


if you only knew how much cussing this case has caused me.  I'd be in the poor house if i had to put a quarter in the jukebox everytime.

:lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Smish on August 09, 2006, 09:05:29 PM
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
Quote from: "Smish"
Quote from: "San"
Just to add a little regarding the work that was done on Deepak's car.  My nephew happened to walk in the house and I show him the part of Deepak's statement about his car.  My nephew does the exact kind of work that Deepak is talking about.  I asked him for his comments and he said the following:

Automotive carpet is formed to the contour of the car and is not glued down it is held in place by the seats and door sill plates. Also there is no reason to remove the carpet to run wires. Even in the most expensive systems there is no reason to remove the carpet.  In order to remove the carpet you must remove the front and rear seats and center console.  Also if you have the same make/model car all the parts are interchangeable.

 :cry: Hmmmm,very interesting,also very interesting that Deepak even brought this up as it is now a obvious lie.Why make up a lie if you don't HAVE to?I think he got the carpet and some other parts of his car switched out....they may have had Natalee's blood or other DNA on them.


I think the whole car was switched out from one with tinted windows to one without tinted windows.  The muffler & DVD's & stereo being added too.  Easier to switch out the whole car then to try to make sure every hair, every skin cell, every last drop of blood or DNA is out of the car.

OH!
I agree SunFreak.....who does J2K know who has used cars?Didn't Lorenzo's Father own a dealer ship?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: oldfart on August 09, 2006, 09:06:51 PM
Blah
page 8 has my original question and quote from Deepak statement of something like Joran almost fell in the water.
Water at the casinos..??
I think Shiz and I are assuming that he was summoned to the police station within a day or two.  It may have been longer.
Whenever it occured when was Joarn with him and got sand in the car prior to that.
IF the BEACH drop occured as described.. Joran got out and left and no one picked him up in that car  NO sand from Joran on that occasion

Anna
Why would Deepak be anticipating a question of why the carpet in his car was glued down?  When they only asked who the prior owner was?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Smish on August 09, 2006, 09:09:26 PM
Quote from: "A's Fever"
Quote from: "Katysmom"
Quote from: "Smish"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
KLAASEN, what is the date of the rush to the courthouse where JR inserts herself into this, after summoning Jug & Beth to let her ride with them to the courthouse.  I have it from a 6/13/05 article, but not sure that is the date of the occurrence.


I believe it was June 13th.

But wait,When renHO went with the family to the courthouse wasn't this because renHO said they had Nat's body there?If so,then a body was reported twice?


Wouldn't it seem strange that they would take a body to a courthouse and not a hospital, morgue, or coroner's office?


It seems like a diversionary tactic because the family was getting too close.  They had to throw the family off the track and move the body to a secure location when they knew the family would be diverted.

OMG...yes,true and possible.So what searches were going on about the time that renHO did this diversion?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: oldfart on August 09, 2006, 09:13:29 PM
Quote from: "blah"

<<snip>>
if you only knew how much cussing this case has caused me.  I'd be in the poor house if i had to put a quarter in the jukebox every time.

:lol:


Mom had an old style Mason Jar that we all had to put nickel, dime or quarter into based upon the word used.  Anything over a quarter did not matter..
that got into different restrictions (for me anyway) :wink: :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: blah on August 09, 2006, 09:14:20 PM
Quote from: "oldfart"
Blah
page 8 has my original question and quote from Deepak statement of something like Joran almost fell in the water.
Water at the casinos..??
I think Shiz and I are assuming that he was summoned to the police station within a day or two.  It may have been longer.
Whenever it occured when was Joarn with him and got sand in the car prior to that.
IF the BEACH drop occured as described.. Joran got out and left and no one picked him up in that car  NO sand from Joran on that occasion

Anna
Why would Deepak be anticipating a question of why the carpet in his car was glued down?  When they only asked who the prior owner was?


seems to have been a really sandy area where the gardner witness claims to have seen them sitting in the car, right?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on August 09, 2006, 09:17:02 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Sand in car from Joran... When the HT's arive at the Sloot compound and Deepak and Joran are there, there is a statment from the laywer that is with Joe T's response... there is a statement from the lawyer with information provided by Beth / Jug, etc. Joran was dressed in a casual manner and there was sand. Deepak never says that it was the Sunday night that Joran got into his vehicle and messed it up with sand.
Could have been the Monday. That is my guess.
.
Does anyone know where I can find the exact time that Beth and family / friends actually arrive at the Sloot compound ?  
.
Deepak says he got off work at 11:10 the Monday. Satish picked him up. They went to the Kalpoe house and then Deepak went to the Radisson as he had called Joran just before he got off work. Says he got to the Radisson at midnight. And he thinks they left to go to the Wyndham at 2 ish. In the Wyndham parking lot is when he says they got the call from Paulus.


5:00 AM =
The TWITTY’s, CROES, G. Ruffner PAGE Jr., Alberto, JODY BEARMAN, PAUL LILLY-the student chaperone, the UNITED STATES D.E.A. agent, the UNITED STATES F.B.I. agent, the CROES/TWITTY’s mutual friends, a kid who knows CROES, the kid who knows Prime Suspect JORAN VAN DER SLOOT, and 2 ARUBAN policemen arrive back at SLOOT home.
BETH and JUG TWITTY told FOX News on 7-5 that it was Current Suspect DEEPAK KALPOE (not Current Suspect SATISH KALPOE) who was with Prime Suspect JORAN VAN DER SLOOT casually leaning back against Current Suspect DEEPAK KALPOE’s “Honda” when the police pulled back up to the house at 5:00 AM on 5-31 and the meeting between the ARUBAN policemen, when the Suspects SLOOT‘s, the UNITED STATES D.E.A. agent, JODY BEARMAN, the UNITED STATES F.B.I. agent, PAUL LILLY-the student chaperone, and the TWITTY’s took place. (Current Suspect DEEPAK KALPOE, apparently, gave Prime Suspect JORAN VAN DER SLOOT a ride home from “Wyndham Hotel“ casino? Where is Current Suspect SATISH KALPOE?)

BETH and JUG TWITTY told FOX News on 7-5 that it was Current Suspect DEEPAK KALPOE (not Current Suspect SATISH KALPOE) who was with Prime Suspect JORAN VAN DER SLOOT and both Suspects were just casually leaning back against Current Suspect DEEPAK KALPOE’s “Honda” when the police pulled back up to the house at 5:00 AM on 5-31 and the meeting between the ARUBAN policemen, when the Suspects SLOOT‘s, the UNITED STATES D.E.A. agent, JODY BERMAN, PAUL LILLY-the student chaperone, and the TWITTY’s took place.

BETH stays in a car. The meeting lasts approximately 1 hour.

On 10-13 when BETH was asked if she heard any 5-31 early morning statements made by Prime Suspect JORAN VAN DER SLOOT about him sexually assaulting NATALEE, BETH replied, “That would be information that I obtained second hand. I did not hear Joran say this among the group. I was the only witness that remained in the car, but Jug has since relayed exactly what Joran had said.”

.
Ok, so they went to the house. the first time.... then they went to the Wyndham because that is where Joran told his Dad he was. But Joran and Deepak weren't there because Paulus told him to stay there and Joran went home. Did they pass each other on the road ?
I am looking for some time in between Joran and Deepak leaving the Radisson to getting back to the Sloots where Joran could almost fall in the water.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: oldfart on August 09, 2006, 09:20:56 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "oldfart"
Blah
page 8 has my original question and quote from Deepak statement of something like Joran almost fell in the water.
Water at the casinos..??
I think Shiz and I are assuming that he was summoned to the police station within a day or two.  It may have been longer.
Whenever it occured when was Joarn with him and got sand in the car prior to that.
IF the BEACH drop occured as described.. Joran got out and left and no one picked him up in that car  NO sand from Joran on that occasion

Anna
Why would Deepak be anticipating a question of why the carpet in his car was glued down?  When they only asked who the prior owner was?


seems to have been a really sandy area where the gardner witness claims to have seen them sitting in the car, right?


I do not belive that Deepak admitted he was seen on the beach by the gardner.   I do not think Jammie Skeeters asked if he was there .. Only something about the gardner could not identify the 3rd person and he said something like " my brother"  which everone was / is assuming

It would have been nice if after hearing Joran got sand in the car.. the investigators (using that term loosely)  would have asked when & where did this occur.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Smish on August 09, 2006, 09:21:14 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "San"
Just to add a little regarding the work that was done on Deepak's car.  My nephew happened to walk in the house and I show him the part of Deepak's statement about his car.  My nephew does the exact kind of work that Deepak is talking about.  I asked him for his comments and he said the following:

Automotive carpet is formed to the contour of the car and is not glued down it is held in place by the seats and door sill plates. Also there is no reason to remove the carpet to run wires. Even in the most expensive systems there is no reason to remove the carpet.  In order to remove the carpet you must remove the front and rear seats and center console.  Also if you have the same make/model car all the parts are interchangeable.


I am an automotive engineer (over 14 years now) and I agree with your nephew.  Also, there is no reason to use "sealant" as Deepak says unless they are replacing a portion of the floor pan (a section of the sheet metal under the carpet)  Interesting that he says he doesnt know if previous owne had any accidents.  Could a portion of the floor pan have been replaced in Deepaks car?  This would be the only way to truley get rid of any DNA evidence as there are many areas under the carpet that could hold dna evidence.


maybe they used this "glue and sealants" to cover any trace evidence?



The above is the most likely scenario although I tend to believe the back seat and headliner might have also been replaced.  No way to know of those as probably do not require the glue.

As for replacing the entire car, even in Aruba cars are likely registered using the VIN number.  This is put on various parts and places throughout cars these days as an anti-theft, stripping precaution and it is just about impossible to remove all the different places a VIN (Vehicle Identification Number given by the manufacturer) in all these nooks and crannies.  That is the point of putting them there and in places one cannot access without taking the motor apart, etc.

For this reason I do not think it would have been possible to switch out the entire car.  Blah would probably know about this as would other posters.  You could never find let alone chance all the VIN numbers on the average car without a great deal of trouble and time.

JMO

.

You may if the only ones looking at said car are the corrupt ALE.They could have just changed the whole car for appearances sake.Did Deepak ever get that car sold?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: blah on August 09, 2006, 09:23:18 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"

.
Ok, so they went to the house. the first time.... then they went to the Wyndham because that is where Joran told his Dad he was. But Joran and Deepak weren't there because Paulus told him to stay there and Joran went home. Did they pass each other on the road ?
I am looking for some time in between Joran and Deepak leaving the Radisson to getting back to the Sloots where Joran could almost fall in the water.


ok, now i am confused.  when did the sand supposedly get in the car?  I thought he vacuumed the sand on Sunday night before he picked up Joran to goto CnC's.

are we thinking the sand got in there sometime after leaving CnC's and before the run in with the family the next night?  If this is the case, i'm all screwed up here and need to re read something.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: blah on August 09, 2006, 09:25:04 PM
Quote from: "oldfart"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "oldfart"
Blah
page 8 has my original question and quote from Deepak statement of something like Joran almost fell in the water.
Water at the casinos..??
I think Shiz and I are assuming that he was summoned to the police station within a day or two.  It may have been longer.
Whenever it occured when was Joarn with him and got sand in the car prior to that.
IF the BEACH drop occured as described.. Joran got out and left and no one picked him up in that car  NO sand from Joran on that occasion

Anna
Why would Deepak be anticipating a question of why the carpet in his car was glued down?  When they only asked who the prior owner was?


seems to have been a really sandy area where the gardner witness claims to have seen them sitting in the car, right?


I do not belive that Deepak admitted he was seen on the beach by the gardner.   I do not think Jammie Skeeters asked if he was there .. Only something about the gardner could not identify the 3rd person and he said something like " my brother"  which everone was / is assuming

It would have been nice if after hearing Joran got sand in the car.. the investigators (using that term loosely)  would have asked when & where did this occur.


I need to go reread some stuff cuz i'm all messed up on this sand thing.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: AZSunny on August 09, 2006, 09:28:08 PM
Quote from: "oldfart"
I know we have been kicking around Deepaks carpet ect...

but have to back-up just a bit  
from the his June 13th statement
Quote
To your question from whom I bought the car, I can say the following. I bought the car from a man called David GROSS. He works at a company called "Carufa". I must tell you that when they installed the sound in my car, they used a lot of glue and seal/sealant under the carpet of the car. They had to remove the carpets to pull new cables through the car. You can verify this at "Automotive Enterprises". The man who installed it is called Osman OSMAN. I don't know if anyone had an accident/car crash with this car prior to it being sold to me.


Why did Deepak volunteer all the additional information on the carpet?
He answered the question in the 1st sentence  undelined and then added all the other information unerlined in red.

Either there is a question posed that we did not get in this "document" or Deepak is maybe anticipating what the next question might relate to.

JMO


Old Fart,  when the 3 were in the police car, and the conversation was recorded, Joran made a reference to Deepak regarding the Automotive Enterprises"  How does this tie in?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: oldfart on August 09, 2006, 09:29:19 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"

.
Ok, so they went to the house. the first time.... then they went to the Wyndham because that is where Joran told his Dad he was. But Joran and Deepak weren't there because Paulus told him to stay there and Joran went home. Did they pass each other on the road ?
I am looking for some time in between Joran and Deepak leaving the Radisson to getting back to the Sloots where Joran could almost fall in the water.


ok, now i am confused.  when did the sand supposedly get in the car?  I thought he vacuumed the sand on Sunday night before he picked up Joran to goto CnC's.

are we thinking the sand got in there sometime after leaving CnC's and before the run in with the family the next night?  If this is the case, i'm all screwed up here and need to re read something.


BLAH
June 10th statement
http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=166
do a find on sand.. read a little before too  at least back to this point
"To your question whether I can remember the day when I was summoned to the police station at Bubali, I can say the following. Yes I remember that day. "


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: AZSunny on August 09, 2006, 09:35:43 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "oldfart"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "oldfart"
Blah
page 8 has my original question and quote from Deepak statement of something like Joran almost fell in the water.
Water at the casinos..??
I think Shiz and I are assuming that he was summoned to the police station within a day or two.  It may have been longer.
Whenever it occured when was Joarn with him and got sand in the car prior to that.
IF the BEACH drop occured as described.. Joran got out and left and no one picked him up in that car  NO sand from Joran on that occasion

Anna
Why would Deepak be anticipating a question of why the carpet in his car was glued down?  When they only asked who the prior owner was?


seems to have been a really sandy area where the gardner witness claims to have seen them sitting in the car, right?


He said he vaccummed the car prior to going to CandC's because there 'were ants" in the car, and he didn't want the "girls to get ants on them"

I do not belive that Deepak admitted he was seen on the beach by the gardner.   I do not think Jammie Skeeters asked if he was there .. Only something about the gardner could not identify the 3rd person and he said something like " my brother"  which everone was / is assuming

It would have been nice if after hearing Joran got sand in the car.. the investigators (using that term loosely)  would have asked when & where did this occur.


I need to go reread some stuff cuz i'm all messed up on this sand thing.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: AZSunny on August 09, 2006, 09:36:26 PM
He said he vaccummed the car prior to going to CandC's because there 'were ants" in the car, and he didn't want the "girls to get ants on them"


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on August 09, 2006, 09:36:47 PM
Quote from: "oldfart"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"

.
Ok, so they went to the house. the first time.... then they went to the Wyndham because that is where Joran told his Dad he was. But Joran and Deepak weren't there because Paulus told him to stay there and Joran went home. Did they pass each other on the road ?
I am looking for some time in between Joran and Deepak leaving the Radisson to getting back to the Sloots where Joran could almost fall in the water.


ok, now i am confused.  when did the sand supposedly get in the car?  I thought he vacuumed the sand on Sunday night before he picked up Joran to goto CnC's.

are we thinking the sand got in there sometime after leaving CnC's and before the run in with the family the next night?  If this is the case, i'm all screwed up here and need to re read something.


BLAH
June 10th statement
http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=166
do a find on sand.. read a little before too  at least back to this point
"To your question whether I can remember the day when I was summoned to the police station at Bubali, I can say the following. Yes I remember that day. "


Did anyone ever answer my question as to the fact I believe that the Vandersloot "boys" went to the police station just hours after Beth & Jug were at their house, say around 10 a.m.  I think it was said Paulus accompanied his slug son.  If that is correct, then did they call K2 or did K2 accompany them?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on August 09, 2006, 09:37:58 PM
Quote from: "AZSunny"
He said he vaccummed the car prior to going to CandC's because there 'were ants" in the car, and he didn't want the "girls to get ants on them"


I guess Florin (or whatever her name was) is the girl they hoped would accompany them and help them lure tourists to locations where they would make pimp videos.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: oldfart on August 09, 2006, 09:38:33 PM
Quote from: "AZSunny"
Quote from: "oldfart"
I know we have been kicking around Deepaks carpet ect...

but have to back-up just a bit  
from the his June 13th statement
Quote
To your question from whom I bought the car, I can say the following. I bought the car from a man called David GROSS. He works at a company called "Carufa". I must tell you that when they installed the sound in my car, they used a lot of glue and seal/sealant under the carpet of the car. They had to remove the carpets to pull new cables through the car. You can verify this at "Automotive Enterprises". The man who installed it is called Osman OSMAN. I don't know if anyone had an accident/car crash with this car prior to it being sold to me.


Why did Deepak volunteer all the additional information on the carpet?
He answered the question in the 1st sentence  undelined and then added all the other information unerlined in red.

Either there is a question posed that we did not get in this "document" or Deepak is maybe anticipating what the next question might relate to.

JMO


Old Fart,  when the 3 were in the police car, and the conversation was recorded, Joran made a reference to Deepak regarding the Automotive Enterprises"  How does this tie in?


AZSunny

I do not know....I can speculate....  
My point is WHY DID HE BRING UP THAT THE CARPET IS GLUED DOWN
when he was not asked (as far as we can tell) about the carpet.?
He did mention spill on the carpet.. WAS any trace of said spill looked for or found?

AS far as "Automotive Enterprises".. I bet they can replace automoblie carpets or the materials / tools in the shop are appropriate for someone to do it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on August 09, 2006, 09:39:20 PM
Quote from: "AZSunny"
He said he vaccummed the car prior to going to CandC's because there 'were ants" in the car, and he didn't want the "girls to get ants on them"


I recall that and I also recall that he vacuumed the car the following week on Sunday, yet again.  Not the same Sunday, but a week following the trip to C&C.  Were they assuming girls were just waiting to be picked up for the fluffah/snuffa videos.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on August 09, 2006, 09:39:27 PM
Quote from: "oldfart"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"

.
Ok, so they went to the house. the first time.... then they went to the Wyndham because that is where Joran told his Dad he was. But Joran and Deepak weren't there because Paulus told him to stay there and Joran went home. Did they pass each other on the road ?
I am looking for some time in between Joran and Deepak leaving the Radisson to getting back to the Sloots where Joran could almost fall in the water.


ok, now i am confused.  when did the sand supposedly get in the car?  I thought he vacuumed the sand on Sunday night before he picked up Joran to goto CnC's.

are we thinking the sand got in there sometime after leaving CnC's and before the run in with the family the next night?  If this is the case, i'm all screwed up here and need to re read something.


BLAH
June 10th statement
http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=166
do a find on sand.. read a little before too  at least back to this point
"To your question whether I can remember the day when I was summoned to the police station at Bubali, I can say the following. Yes I remember that day. "

Deepak does not say when the sand got in the car.
He vacuumed the ants out before they went to C & C's.
He says he vacuumed the day before they went to Bulbai.
Monday night, when they said they had just left the Radisson to go to the Wyndham, they were in the Wyndham parking lot at 2 ish when Paul called. I am saying ? Didn't the HT's get to the Sloot compound the first time later than 2 ish ?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on August 09, 2006, 09:43:27 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "oldfart"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"

.
Ok, so they went to the house. the first time.... then they went to the Wyndham because that is where Joran told his Dad he was. But Joran and Deepak weren't there because Paulus told him to stay there and Joran went home. Did they pass each other on the road ?
I am looking for some time in between Joran and Deepak leaving the Radisson to getting back to the Sloots where Joran could almost fall in the water.


ok, now i am confused.  when did the sand supposedly get in the car?  I thought he vacuumed the sand on Sunday night before he picked up Joran to goto CnC's.

are we thinking the sand got in there sometime after leaving CnC's and before the run in with the family the next night?  If this is the case, i'm all screwed up here and need to re read something.


BLAH
June 10th statement
http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=166
do a find on sand.. read a little before too  at least back to this point
"To your question whether I can remember the day when I was summoned to the police station at Bubali, I can say the following. Yes I remember that day. "


Did anyone ever answer my question as to the fact I believe that the Vandersloot "boys" went to the police station just hours after Beth & Jug were at their house, say around 10 a.m.  I think it was said Paulus accompanied his slug son.  If that is correct, then did they call K2 or did K2 accompany them?

It wasn't the Tuesday. paulus wnet ans poke to theheadmaster, Robert Werner as to why Joran was late for school. As they had been up with the people from the States.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: oldfart on August 09, 2006, 09:46:07 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"

Did anyone ever answer my question as to the fact I believe that the Vandersloot "boys" went to the police station just hours after Beth & Jug were at their house, say around 10 a.m.  I think it was said Paulus accompanied his slug son.  If that is correct, then did they call K2 or did K2 accompany them?


Tyler
Going from memory (what is left tonight) Joran went in AFTER school Monday sometime (i think).  It seems the three were required to give statements on Monday or Tuesday but I do not have a link or quote.
When Deepak went to the station at Bubali could have been then or later.
The Durn investigators( :? ) did not state the date in the interview..
Whether the younger son ever gave a statement.. I have no idea.
If he was home when Beth Arrived you would think the police would have aske for something..  EVEN if he said he slept through the entire night. :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on August 09, 2006, 09:46:30 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"


Did anyone ever answer my question as to the fact I believe that the Vandersloot "boys" went to the police station just hours after Beth & Jug were at their house, say around 10 a.m.  I think it was said Paulus accompanied his slug son.  If that is correct, then did they call K2 or did K2 accompany them?


May 31- ~2:30 AM - BHT group arrives at Noord police station and wait for police to accompany them to the vd Sloot home

May 31 – 3 AM – Paulus emerges from house and takes the group to the Wyndham looking for Joran.  Joran is allegedly gambling with Deepak & Guido Wever at the Radisson and Wyndham casinos that evening.

May 31 – until 5 AM -  Group returns to vd Sloot home & confrontation ensues in which Joran & Deepak claim they dropped Natalee at the HI at 2AM where she encounters a security guard after stumbling & hitting her head on the ground.  Joran allegedly gives details of his sexual encounter with Natalee.  Paulus allegedly says he picked Joran up from McDonalds at 4 AM, which he later changes to 11 PM.   At some point the group allegedly goes to the Holiday Inn to view the drop off site.  

May 31 – 10 AM Beth & Jug arrive at Noord police station to file missing person report, but are told it is not needed. Reportedly, the police referred to Natalee as “puta” and Beth & Jug were made to wait while Jacobs shaves and has “corn flakes”

May 31 – ~3 PM – J2K are questioned & released


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on August 09, 2006, 09:48:34 PM
Good evening monkeys, how is everyone?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on August 09, 2006, 09:52:36 PM
Quote from: "oldfart"
Quote from: "Tylergal"

Did anyone ever answer my question as to the fact I believe that the Vandersloot "boys" went to the police station just hours after Beth & Jug were at their house, say around 10 a.m.  I think it was said Paulus accompanied his slug son.  If that is correct, then did they call K2 or did K2 accompany them?


Tyler
Going from memory (what is left tonight) Joran went in AFTER school Monday sometime (i think).  It seems the three were required to give statements on Monday or Tuesday but I do not have a link or quote.
When Deepak went to the station at Bubali could have been then or later.
The Durn investigators( :? ) did not state the date in the interview..
Whether the younger son ever gave a statement.. I have no idea.
If he was home when Beth Arrived you would think the police would have aske for something..  EVEN if he said he slept through the entire night. :shock:


It seems like I remember them going in to make statements and Paulus accompanied them, at least Joran.  

Joran is the ONLY ONE who says younger son was there at home.  According to the manifest that Widget found, two sons accompanied Anita home later that week.  There was never any manifest found with Paulus name on it for that Sunday (when the sporter said he had to go to pick his father up at airport on arrival from Holland).  There was also never any verification whether or not Paulus had ever been anywhere or not.  Also, Joran later says he cannot drive, does not know how.  Did he lie about going to pick up his father or did he lie about his brother being home alone?  So many lies, such a big head.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: oldfart on August 09, 2006, 09:52:55 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Good evening monkeys, how is everyone?

Hi Lala's
Minor cussin & spitting

Seems like a lot us would like to have a one on one with some people and ask them a LOT better questions than they did and maybe (http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c314/OldF/kickass.gif) :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on August 09, 2006, 09:54:19 PM
Quote from: "oldfart"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Good evening monkeys, how is everyone?

Hi Lala's
Minor cussin & spitting

Seems like a lot us would like to have a one on one with some people and ask them a LOT better questions than they did and maybe (http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c314/OldF/kickass.gif) :wink:


I noticed that.  Think Blah has a few pages dedicated to him tonight.  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: oldfart on August 09, 2006, 09:56:30 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "oldfart"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Good evening monkeys, how is everyone?

Hi Lala's
Minor cussin & spitting

Seems like a lot us would like to have a one on one with some people and ask them a LOT better questions than they did and maybe (http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c314/OldF/kickass.gif) :wink:


I noticed that.  Think Blah has a few pages dedicated to him tonight.  :lol:


If we cuss or spit using Graphic   ie.. not typing the words   Does it still count against us?? or is it double  since a picture is worth a 1000 words?
Just wondering :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: San on August 09, 2006, 09:59:26 PM
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
Quote from: "Tylergal"


Did anyone ever answer my question as to the fact I believe that the Vandersloot "boys" went to the police station just hours after Beth & Jug were at their house, say around 10 a.m.  I think it was said Paulus accompanied his slug son.  If that is correct, then did they call K2 or did K2 accompany them?


May 31- ~2:30 AM - BHT group arrives at Noord police station and wait for police to accompany them to the vd Sloot home

May 31 – 3 AM – Paulus emerges from house and takes the group to the Wyndham looking for Joran.  Joran is allegedly gambling with Deepak & Guido Wever at the Radisson and Wyndham casinos that evening.

May 31 – until 5 AM -  Group returns to vd Sloot home & confrontation ensues in which Joran & Deepak claim they dropped Natalee at the HI at 2AM where she encounters a security guard after stumbling & hitting her head on the ground.  Joran allegedly gives details of his sexual encounter with Natalee.  Paulus allegedly says he picked Joran up from McDonalds at 4 AM, which he later changes to 11 PM.   At some point the group allegedly goes to the Holiday Inn to view the drop off site.  

May 31 – 10 AM Beth & Jug arrive at Noord police station to file missing person report, but are told it is not needed. Reportedly, the police referred to Natalee as “puta” and Beth & Jug were made to wait while Jacobs shaves and has “corn flakes”

May 31 – ~3 PM – J2K are questioned & released

Everytime I read this just makes me want to blow their brains out. :evil:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: blah on August 09, 2006, 10:00:57 PM
Quote from: "oldfart"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"

.
Ok, so they went to the house. the first time.... then they went to the Wyndham because that is where Joran told his Dad he was. But Joran and Deepak weren't there because Paulus told him to stay there and Joran went home. Did they pass each other on the road ?
I am looking for some time in between Joran and Deepak leaving the Radisson to getting back to the Sloots where Joran could almost fall in the water.


ok, now i am confused.  when did the sand supposedly get in the car?  I thought he vacuumed the sand on Sunday night before he picked up Joran to goto CnC's.

are we thinking the sand got in there sometime after leaving CnC's and before the run in with the family the next night?  If this is the case, i'm all screwed up here and need to re read something.


BLAH
June 10th statement
http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=166
do a find on sand.. read a little before too  at least back to this point
"To your question whether I can remember the day when I was summoned to the police station at Bubali, I can say the following. Yes I remember that day. "


ok, its starting to make more sense now - not that what Deepak is saying really makes any sense.  So we have Deepak stating that he vacuumed the car before picking Joran up to goto CnC's and we also have Deepak stating that he vacuumed his car the day before he was summoned to the police station at Bubali (whenever that was) because Joran almost fell in the water and got sand all over his shorts and legs.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on August 09, 2006, 10:01:49 PM
Um...Red spelled out the sh*t word on the FP...I noticed, OF & Lala's.

Was wondering about something.  We previously read that Joran said that Deepak parked his car by the Radisson, and they walked to the Wyndam..the statement says they got in the car to drive to the Wyndam, when Paulus called...what's up with that??....just wondering, like OF and many others.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: oldfart on August 09, 2006, 10:02:09 PM
[quote="Tylergal']
<<Snip>>
It seems like I remember them going in to make statements and Paulus accompanied them, at least Joran.  

Joran is the ONLY ONE who says younger son was there at home.  According to the manifest that Widget found, two sons accompanied Anita home later that week.  There was never any manifest found with Paulus name on it for that Sunday (when the sporter said he had to go to pick his father up at airport on arrival from Holland).  There was also never any verification whether or not Paulus had ever been anywhere or not.  Also, Joran later says he cannot drive, does not know how.  Did he lie about going to pick up his father or did he lie about his brother being home alone?  So many lies, such a big head.[/quote]

I do not doubt what Widget found... I doubt what they may have been told by the airlines {Salt sack}

This is a basic item that Aruban News outlets or even the police should be able to verify as who was in the home that night.  
ie.. IF one or more younger brothers were home.. fine.. no misinformation has been put out.. STATE it  as fact.  
To not do so lends more to the cover-up theory

JMO


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on August 09, 2006, 10:04:02 PM
OF
Yes, a picture is worth a thousand words...and I can count.  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on August 09, 2006, 10:04:15 PM
Blah....I love your new BLAH avi...
very cool...

I jus googled for latest news on natalee holloway and the ABC interview PRIME TIME popped up, transcript and time was 6 hours ago.

Just out of curiosity, did they re run this tonight?

I am wondering why that interview would pop up under Latest news...

Thanks if anyone knows.........


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on August 09, 2006, 10:06:28 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
Quote from: "Tylergal"


Did anyone ever answer my question as to the fact I believe that the Vandersloot "boys" went to the police station just hours after Beth & Jug were at their house, say around 10 a.m.  I think it was said Paulus accompanied his slug son.  If that is correct, then did they call K2 or did K2 accompany them?


May 31- ~2:30 AM - BHT group arrives at Noord police station and wait for police to accompany them to the vd Sloot home

May 31 – 3 AM – Paulus emerges from house and takes the group to the Wyndham looking for Joran.  Joran is allegedly gambling with Deepak & Guido Wever at the Radisson and Wyndham casinos that evening.

May 31 – until 5 AM -  Group returns to vd Sloot home & confrontation ensues in which Joran & Deepak claim they dropped Natalee at the HI at 2AM where she encounters a security guard after stumbling & hitting her head on the ground.  Joran allegedly gives details of his sexual encounter with Natalee.  Paulus allegedly says he picked Joran up from McDonalds at 4 AM, which he later changes to 11 PM.   At some point the group allegedly goes to the Holiday Inn to view the drop off site.  

May 31 – 10 AM Beth & Jug arrive at Noord police station to file missing person report, but are told it is not needed. Reportedly, the police referred to Natalee as “puta” and Beth & Jug were made to wait while Jacobs shaves and has “corn flakes”

May 31 – ~3 PM – J2K are questioned & released

Everytime I read this just makes me want to blow their brains out. :evil:


Hear ya, San...when this occurs, usually the party is speaking of themselves, but trying to divert it to others.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: blah on August 09, 2006, 10:07:32 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Blah....I love your new BLAH avi...
very cool...

I jus googled for latest news on natalee holloway and the ABC interview PRIME TIME popped up, transcript and time was 6 hours ago.

Just out of curiosity, did they re run this tonight?

I am wondering why that interview would pop up under Latest news...

Thanks if anyone knows.........


Thanks Jacqueline, Anna gave it to me.  I'm starting to get tired/brain is shutting down.  Probably wont be here much longer.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on August 09, 2006, 10:08:39 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Blah....I love your new BLAH avi...
very cool...

I jus googled for latest news on natalee holloway and the ABC interview PRIME TIME popped up, transcript and time was 6 hours ago.

Just out of curiosity, did they re run this tonight?

I am wondering why that interview would pop up under Latest news...

Thanks if anyone knows.........


Thanks Jacqueline, Anna gave it to me.  I'm starting to get tired/brain is shutting down.  Probably wont be here much longer.


I'm tired too....

Well Anna out did herself on this one...It's simple. Cool.  And blue. And I love blue....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: oldfart on August 09, 2006, 10:12:04 PM
SunFreak  
thanks for the timeline... we still do not know what date the summons to Deepak to the police were occured ~ there could have been more than one

2NJ  
you can talk to LaLa's to see if she makes book entries for Front Page posters :wink:

Tyler  
Sorry I messed up you qoute with my post

Blah
Glad we are on at least SEMI on the same page.now.

Like I said sometime yesterday(?)
when I grounded my kids from going to the Mall or someplace they asked more intelligent qustions than you get out of ALE in these statement
(http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c314/OldF/explode_small.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on August 09, 2006, 10:12:44 PM
here is what I was looking for : The Greta and Charlie :

VAN SUSTEREN: So you drove over to the van der Sloot home. And any idea about what time you arrived there?
C. CROES: Close to 3:00.


VAN SUSTEREN: Prior to that time when you went to the house, had you ever heard of the van der Sloot's or had you ever been to their house before?

C. CROES: Never.

VAN SUSTEREN: So then what happened next?

C. CROES: What happened next was that, in the interim of doing that, we had notified the family that we had found a house. Then they asked us to meet them at the police station. So we went back over to the police station.

VAN SUSTEREN: About how far is the police station from the van der Sloot house?

C. CROES: Actually very close.

VAN SUSTEREN: So what did do you next? What time did you leave the police station about?

C. CROES: Some time between 2:40, 2:30, 2:45… at that time.

VAN SUSTEREN: A.M.?

C. CROES: Yes.

VAN SUSTEREN: And where did you go?

C. CROES: Right to the house.

VAN SUSTEREN: Who went?

C. CROES: All of the people that were there, myself included.
...........................
So, Monday night.. Deepak says the call came after they left the Radisson. They were going back to the Wyndham. Deepak got to the Radisson at 12:00 and they stayed and played for about two hours.
They left after Joran had some sort of a scene with a tourist. Guido went to take Anrde home. Deepak and Joran say they are going to the Wyndham and when they are in the parking lot at 2 ish they get the call.
Their presence is public until 2 am in the Radisson and they are not seen again until the HT's come back from the Wyndham. This is about 1 1/2 hours unaccounted for. Joran is wearing shorts and is sandy.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on August 09, 2006, 10:14:03 PM
ORANJESTAD, Aruba — One of the three suspects being held in Aruba for the disappearance of an Alabama teen vacationing there has been moved from a jail to a prison, while the other two are expected to be transported today, two sources confirmed with FOX News.

A judge ruled last night that Deepak Kalpoe, who was moved to a prison last night, Satish Kalpoe and Joran van der Sloot can be held for eight more days while the investigation into Natalee Holloway's (search) disappearance continues.

Authorities on Friday arrested another person in connection with the disappearance of missing honors student, officials said.

According to sources, the new man detained is a 26-year-old friend of van der Sloot (search), the Dutch teenager who is said to have been with Holloway the night she disappeared.

The Aruban attorney general's office initially identified him only by the initials "S.G.C.," but Holloway's mother told an interviewer that his name was "Steve." FOX News later confirmed that the man's name was Steve Gregory Croes.

Meanwhile, police brought in yet another man for questioning Friday night, FOX News has learned. The man, Max Arends, who is also a friend of van der Sloot, is not a suspect in the case and has not been arrested.

(Story continues below)

 ADVERTISEMENTS
Advertise Here

Police Superintendent Jan van der Straaten told The Associated Press Croes was detained based on information from one of the other three detainees.

Croes, who works as a party boat disk jockey, said he was contacted by police Thursday night and went to the station voluntarily to give a statement, said his employer, Marcus Wiggins.

Croes also said he knew one of two Surinamese brothers being detained in the case because they went to the same Internet cafe, Wiggins told The Associated Press. However, Wiggins said that he had not seen the other three young men detained in the case on the boat where Croes works, a vessel called the Tattoo that offers nightly dining, swimming and dancing.

As for Croes' work ethic, Wiggins had nothing bad to say.

"I've never had problems with him," Wiggins told the AP. "He keeps to himself and shows up to work every day and does his job."

In Alabama, a woman who helped organize the graduation trip, Jody Bearman, said students did not go on the Tattoo as a group, although some could have taken a boat ride without the seven adult chaperones knowing.

"The chaperones were not supposed to keep up with their every move," Bearman said.

FOX News also learned that police may have questioned yet another young man, said to be of Dutch nationality, on Thursday night.

Mariaine Croes, spokeswoman for the Aruban Attorney General Caren Janssen, confirmed that Steve Croes was "in custody and being interrogated."

"Every day that the investigation continues," she told FOX News, "we are a step closer to solving this case."

Mariaine Croes also said she was no relation to Steve Croes, adding that the surname was a common one on the island.

In a separate development, a judge ruled that two of the detainees, Surinamese brothers Deepak Kalpoe (search), 21, and Satish Kalpoe (search), 18, were granted access to documents they have asked for, according to their lawyer.

Van der Sloot and the Kalpoes were questioned and released shortly after Holloway's May 30 disappearance, but then formally arrested June 9, after police moved their focus away from two security guards who had been arrested and were later released.

Beth Holloway Twitty, Holloway's mother, declined to give any more details about Croes but she told Associated Press Television News that she believes more people could be detained in the case.

"This is just the beginning," she said.

Holloway Twitty has been in Aruba (search) since nearly the early days of the search for her daughter.

"I want my daughter and I want her now," she said. "I'm very frustrated. We are in day 18 with no answers."

Paul Reynolds, Holloway's uncle, told FOX News the family remained confident that they would find out what happened.

"The authorities in Aruba and the United States are assuring us every effort will be made to find out what has occurred," Reynolds said Friday.

Van der Sloot and the Kalpoe brothers appeared in court Friday morning. It was not clear where Croes was being held.

Prosecutors asked a judge to rule that there was sufficient cause to continue holding van der Sloot and the Kalpoes. The three were detained June 9. Under the law, a judge must review their case after 10 days, rendering a decision by Sunday.

No one has been charged with a crime in the case.

The judge granted a petition by van der Sloot's father, Paul, to visit his son in jail, but then reversed the decision. Paul van der Sloot is a judge-in-training, serving a three-year term on the bench that allows him to hear a limited number of cases.

Also Friday, the court barred van der Sloot's lawyer, Antonio Carlo, from visiting the teen, effectively removing him from the case, said Attorney General spokeswoman Mariaine Croes.

As a result, the van der Sloots retained two more attorneys for the defense of their son, Richie Kock and Arjan Debie.

The court granted prosecutors' request to remove Carlo because he had visited one of two former security guards who had been detained and released in the case, authorities said.

Croes said the Dutch teenager has a team of lawyers, so Carlo's removal will not leave van der Sloot without representation. The spokeswoman is not related to Steve Croes.

Carlo did not return calls seeking comment.

The judge was brought in from neighboring Curaçao island, as is typical in high-profile cases.

Holloway disappeared the same day she was to return from a five-day trip with 124 other students celebrating their graduation from high school in Mountain Brook, Ala.

Searches by authorities, volunteer islanders and tourists have come up empty. Authorities refused to say whether they believed Holloway was dead.

On Thursday, however, Police Superintendent Jan van der Straaten told The Associated Press that authorities used a helicopter "to search for possible remains — but found nothing." He declined to say where the search was conducted.

On Wednesday, authorities searched the van der Sloots' one-story, yellow-beige home, where Joran lived in an attached apartment. Agents were seen carrying two white garbage bags filled with items from the house, while authorities towed away a blue sport utility vehicle and a red Jeep from the property in Noord, outside the capital, Oranjestad.

After the approximately four-hour search, Janssen said Paul van der Sloot was not under investigation.

The Kalpoe brothers have told police that they and Joran were with Holloway the night she disappeared and that she and the Dutch youth were kissing in the back seat of their car. The detainees initially said they took Holloway to a northern beach and then dropped her off at her Holiday Inn.

But Antonius "Mickey" John, a former hotel security guard released from custody Sunday, said to reporters that Deepak Kalpoe told him during a chat in jail that he and his brother actually dropped the young van der Sloot and Holloway off together near the Marriott, about 10 blocks north of the Holiday Inn. John said he passed the information on to police.

On Tuesday, FBI agents and officers from the Miami-Dade police department used German Shepherds to search the area, known as Malmok beach, which is a popular nighttime spot for lovers.

Deepak Kalpoe's lawyer would not comment on John's statement Wednesday, but has said his client maintained his innocence.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on August 09, 2006, 10:15:46 PM
So in the above statement I just posted and omitted this:  It appears there was a separation from Deepak to J&S.  Why was this.  Also note it says they were questioned shortly after she went missing but do not state the date.  I am going to believe that is the statement which Beth says was given to her, that she has in her possession, that was probably tossed since there was too much that would lead to charges against JORAN.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: oldfart on August 09, 2006, 10:19:42 PM
Hey... I just say a new name  peeking in

BUMPER   (http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c314/OldF/508e1030.gif)

Please jump on it.. and not just (http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c314/OldF/8b03b6c8.gif)

Please


OldF


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on August 09, 2006, 10:22:11 PM
So, I did find about 1 1/2 hours where no one knows ( or I don't know )
where Deepak and Joran were on the Monday night. From 2 -ish to 3 :30 ish.


They were in the vicinity of the Radisson at 2 - ish.
Then, they were at the Sloot compound at 3 : 30 -ish.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: oldfart on August 09, 2006, 10:23:34 PM
I hate to say this in a way

But given the quality of the recent statements (if they are close to factual) it is not a wonder that this investigation is a MESS

I do hope that the senator   ummmm that met with the Aruban delegation,,, ummm B???  has seen these.. and has as MANY questions as i do.

Jmo of course


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: oldfart on August 09, 2006, 10:26:23 PM
Shoot

I think I scared Bumper away :cry:
 :oops:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on August 09, 2006, 10:27:11 PM
Quote from: "oldfart"
I hate to say this in a way

But given the quality of the recent statements (if they are close to factual) it is not a wonder that this investigation is a MESS

I do hope that the senator   ummmm that met with the Aruban delegation,,, ummm B???  has seen these.. and has as MANY questions as i do.

Jmo of course


You have a way with words, OF, and it works for me.  Hope it works for Senator B & others.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on August 09, 2006, 10:27:56 PM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Quote from: "oldfart"
I hate to say this in a way

But given the quality of the recent statements (if they are close to factual) it is not a wonder that this investigation is a MESS

I do hope that the senator   ummmm that met with the Aruban delegation,,, ummm B???  has seen these.. and has as MANY questions as i do.

Jmo of course


You have a way with words, OF, and it works for me.  Hope it works for Senator B & others.


Congressman Bachus of Vestavia, Alabama.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: oldfart on August 09, 2006, 10:32:13 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
So, I did find about 1 1/2 hours where no one knows ( or I don't know )
where Deepak and Joran were on the Monday night. From 2 -ish to 3 :30 ish.


They were in the vicinity of the Radisson at 2 - ish.
Then, they were at the Sloot compound at 3 : 30 -ish.


Kat_Gram
Sorry :oops:  I have not been following that close...
Time lines are fluid.. based upon who / which statements you use
JMO

good work though with what we have to work with :!: [/b]


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on August 09, 2006, 10:34:07 PM
I am tired tonight, will see all of you later if I can't sleep.  Someone hug Nemo for me, please.  (that's a dog for all you newbies) :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on August 09, 2006, 10:35:07 PM
The other thing that I found and the source came from Kock... the call from Joran's cell to Deepak's cell was at 2:35. This is the call where he tells Deepak according to Deepak that he is walking home and he left the girl and his shoes at the beach.

3:15 IM, I'm home.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: oldfart on August 09, 2006, 10:35:30 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Quote from: "oldfart"
I hate to say this in a way

But given the quality of the recent statements (if they are close to factual) it is not a wonder that this investigation is a MESS

I do hope that the senator   ummmm that met with the Aruban delegation,,, ummm B???  has seen these.. and has as MANY questions as i do.

Jmo of course


You have a way with words, OF, and it works for me.  Hope it works for Senator B & others.


Congressman Bachus of Vestavia, Alabama.


Tyler
that is the name..

I tried to do an e-mail through his web site once...
something about entering the district I was in caused problems
not sure it got through  because I never  got a resoponse :?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: oldfart on August 09, 2006, 10:37:40 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
I am tired tonight, will see all of you later if I can't sleep.  Someone hug Nemo for me, please.  (that's a dog for all you newbies) :wink:


G'nite Lala's  
http://www.cifras.com.br/midis/37733.mid

For Nemo ?  Nemo by Night wish


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: San on August 09, 2006, 10:37:58 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
The other thing that I found and the source came from Kock... the call from Joran's cell to Deepak's cell was at 2:35. This is the call where he tells Deepak according to Deepak that he is walking home and he left the girl and his shoes at the beach.

3:15 IM, I'm home.

This might sound stupid but was it a call or a text message.  Deepak says he was out of minutes.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on August 09, 2006, 10:39:55 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Quote from: "oldfart"
I hate to say this in a way

But given the quality of the recent statements (if they are close to factual) it is not a wonder that this investigation is a MESS

I do hope that the senator   ummmm that met with the Aruban delegation,,, ummm B???  has seen these.. and has as MANY questions as i do.

Jmo of course


You have a way with words, OF, and it works for me.  Hope it works for Senator B & others.


Congressman Bachus of Vestavia, Alabama.


If Senator B doesn't know who he is, then, that's a problem.  Bacchus should be reading here, or have sonmeone doing it for him.  I mean no disrespect, just am stating my opinion.  He was vocal during the onset, and should be following through.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on August 09, 2006, 10:42:07 PM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Quote from: "oldfart"
I hate to say this in a way

But given the quality of the recent statements (if they are close to factual) it is not a wonder that this investigation is a MESS

I do hope that the senator   ummmm that met with the Aruban delegation,,, ummm B???  has seen these.. and has as MANY questions as i do.

Jmo of course


You have a way with words, OF, and it works for me.  Hope it works for Senator B & others.


Congressman Bachus of Vestavia, Alabama.


If Senator B doesn't know who he is, then, that's a problem.  Bacchus should be reading here, or have sonmeone doing it for him.  I mean no disrespect, just am stating my opinion.  He was vocal during the onset, and should be following through.


He is up for re-election, of course, and won his primary quite handily but his district should let him know.  A major part of the money he gets I would assume comes from Mountain Brook.  One day I will tell you all a funny story about him.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on August 09, 2006, 10:47:28 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
The other thing that I found and the source came from Kock... the call from Joran's cell to Deepak's cell was at 2:35. This is the call where he tells Deepak according to Deepak that he is walking home and he left the girl and his shoes at the beach.

3:15 IM, I'm home.

This might sound stupid but was it a call or a text message.  Deepak says he was out of minutes.

One was a phone call where they spoke for Deepak says 5 minutes.
Then Deepak says he sent Joran a message MAS System of Setar
to come online when Joran gets home.
Then he got several messages from Joran saying that he was home, etc.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on August 09, 2006, 10:51:46 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
here is what I was looking for : The Greta and Charlie :

VAN SUSTEREN: So you drove over to the van der Sloot home. And any idea about what time you arrived there?
C. CROES: Close to 3:00.


VAN SUSTEREN: Prior to that time when you went to the house, had you ever heard of the van der Sloot's or had you ever been to their house before?

C. CROES: Never.

VAN SUSTEREN: So then what happened next?

C. CROES: What happened next was that, in the interim of doing that, we had notified the family that we had found a house. Then they asked us to meet them at the police station. So we went back over to the police station.

VAN SUSTEREN: About how far is the police station from the van der Sloot house?

C. CROES: Actually very close.

VAN SUSTEREN: So what did do you next? What time did you leave the police station about?

C. CROES: Some time between 2:40, 2:30, 2:45… at that time.

VAN SUSTEREN: A.M.?

C. CROES: Yes.

VAN SUSTEREN: And where did you go?

C. CROES: Right to the house.

VAN SUSTEREN: Who went?

C. CROES: All of the people that were there, myself included.
...........................
So, Monday night.. Deepak says the call came after they left the Radisson. They were going back to the Wyndham. Deepak got to the Radisson at 12:00 and they stayed and played for about two hours.
They left after Joran had some sort of a scene with a tourist. Guido went to take Anrde home. Deepak and Joran say they are going to the Wyndham and when they are in the parking lot at 2 ish they get the call.
Their presence is public until 2 am in the Radisson and they are not seen again until the HT's come back from the Wyndham. This is about 1 1/2 hours unaccounted for. Joran is wearing shorts and is sandy.


Hmmm.. something stinks!  How could Joran get the call to come home before the Twitty's & the police arrive at the VdS?  The Twitty caravan didn't get to the Police station until around 2:30. They didn't get to Paulus's until 3, then it took him about 20 minutes to answer the door.  They left went to the Wyndham, serached and returned back to the vdS at 5:00.  The Wyndham is not far from the Sloots.  How did it take over 1 1/2 hours? And where were Joran & Deepak that whole time?  Digging Natalee up or burying her?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on August 09, 2006, 10:53:24 PM
Tylergal, yes, tell me the story, later....you will remember probably more than I that it's on hold... :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on August 09, 2006, 10:56:33 PM
Signing out. G'nite, all.  Prayers for Natalee and her family.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: oldfart on August 09, 2006, 11:00:29 PM
Good Night to all Spunky Monkeys

I updated my Sig Line to include a link to some posting music..

I really do like the 4th song for an upbeat posting sound.. and the rest for obvious reasons
JMO of course

SeeeYaaaByeee

G'nite All


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on August 09, 2006, 11:00:37 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
The other thing that I found and the source came from Kock... the call from Joran's cell to Deepak's cell was at 2:35. This is the call where he tells Deepak according to Deepak that he is walking home and he left the girl and his shoes at the beach.

3:15 IM, I'm home.

This might sound stupid but was it a call or a text message.  Deepak says he was out of minutes.

One was a phone call where they spoke for Deepak says 5 minutes.
Then Deepak says he sent Joran a message MAS System of Setar
to come online when Joran gets home.
Then he got several messages from Joran saying that he was home, etc.


.. I printed up Deepak's statements up today. Just to look at where they could be at certain times that were verified. And to tie them into the phone calls. After Deepak gets home, he waits UP until he hears from Joran, even tho Joran says see you tomorrow and doesn't ask him to come back and get him. Then, he gets the call and he doesn't go and get him. Duh ?  Then he watches TV ( it's the middle of the night, ppl are sleeping ) , ( then he goes to the bathroom for a while ), ( then he is on line off and on ) .
He had time to pick Joran up and take him home.
He also had time to go to where he let Joran and Natalee off.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on August 09, 2006, 11:03:42 PM
Time for Mr Sandman.  G'nite.  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on August 09, 2006, 11:05:22 PM
http://www.aruba.com/pages/regionalmap.htm

Aruba interactive map.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Shell on August 09, 2006, 11:11:38 PM
Hi Monkeys :)

Tyler, never fear, my monkey hiney would never leave for good, but some times I need to take a break from posting. I get get pretty angry when certain lines are crossed.

Jac, xxx, and Leslie, thanks for backing me up.

Quick comment on the statements. I have to reread them several times to even begin absorb it all. They do not flow IMHO. I am wondering if some comments or questions were left out. One would think they would delve deeper into the details. On the other hand, inconsistencies do not seem to matter to the people responsible for solving this case.

Joran calls his Dad Paul? Maybe it is a difference in culture. I don't know anyone who did that at Joran's age, unless it was a stepdad.

Also found it interesting that Deepak says "My Mother wanted to hear the story from Joran himself before she would believe our story."


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Shell on August 09, 2006, 11:17:20 PM
Also noted that Deepak begins by saying Joran concocted the HI story, then within a minute, he admits he concocted the HI story.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Bumper on August 09, 2006, 11:18:07 PM
I am also going to send him a little background on one of Aruba's most upstanding citizens, Michael Posner, as well.

I remember some were looking into Posner's background.  He was raised around the Chicago area and his family still lives there.  On an internet search, he was sent to Aruba to look after the mafia's gambling interests there.  He bought his first casino on Curacao.  He was involved in prostitution in Chicago.  He did spend time in prison too but I don't know what the exactl conviction was for.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Bumper on August 09, 2006, 11:28:42 PM
Quote from: "Smish"
Smish wrote:
[So if Joran already told Deepak that he would find a way home that night,why did Deepak wait up to make sure Joran got home?Could Deepak be lying here?Could he have told Joran he WOULD pick him up?
Just not a normal thing for GUYS to do....wait up for a"ok,I'm home"call from another guy friend.


Anna:
Smish,
Yes, I agree that this is just tremendously odd! None of the parents care enough to even know where these kids are or where they have been or how drunk they are and yet these two are oh so tenderly guarding each other to their home safely??

Besides, what would be to worry about since there is no crime at all on One Happy Island, what could possibly go wrong? I don't think I have ever seen such tenderness in two guys for each other in such casual circumstances. Never heard one of my sons calling some guy to say they got home OK. A girl, yes, but never another guy.
*****************************
I agree Anna.Deepak makes this waiting for Joran's call sound like something he is required to do,something he has done about 20 times before,something he was told to do as part of the whole PIMP game plan.


I have a problem with that too.  If Joran is telling the truth and Satish really did go back to get him, why would Deepak expect a call from Joran that he was home?  Wouldn't he have known that when Satish got back?  There is something fishy about that story.  I just wish I knew what it was.  Why did Nadira tell the interviewers that Joran walked home barefooted?

Mikki


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on August 09, 2006, 11:28:59 PM
Quote from: "Bumper"
I am also going to send him a little background on one of Aruba's most upstanding citizens, Michael Posner, as well.

I remember some were looking into Posner's background.  He was raised around the Chicago area and his family still lives there.  On an internet search, he was sent to Aruba to look after the mafia's gambling interests there.  He bought his first casino on Curacao.  He was involved in prostitution in Chicago.  He did spend time in prison too but I don't know what the exactl conviction was for.

MURDER.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Shell on August 09, 2006, 11:29:56 PM
No mention anywhere I know of as to what, if any porn was seized when ALE did sweeps of the 3 amigos homes. I would love to know if they found any "homemade" films. I assume the 3 amigos are in the habit of popping in a porn film, and base that on the picture we have of them in the car with apparently a porn film on the dvd, and Deepak stated they popped one in with Natalee.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Sue on August 09, 2006, 11:34:10 PM
If one of the brothers drove crap head home why would he need to check in anyways.. they would know he was home why call


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Shell on August 09, 2006, 11:34:34 PM
There is the HI story, and there is the truth. We have yet to hear the truth. If plan B was to tell the truth, why and need for plan A? The truth would mean all the stories jive with each other, and they blatantly do not.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Shell on August 09, 2006, 11:36:42 PM
Quote from: "Sue"
If one of the brothers drove crap head home why would he need to check in anyways.. they would know he was home why call


Because they are telling a lie. They can't tell the truth and stay in the clear.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Shell on August 09, 2006, 11:42:14 PM
Why tell the "fingering" story? To explain any bodily fluids in the car? To explain and signs of penetration in the event her body happened to be found?

Just to think that that occurred to an intoxicated young lady, makes my blood boil. That alone, which they all admited to, is an offense.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Ono on August 09, 2006, 11:44:27 PM
Quote from: "Frijole"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "the big hammer"


And is it true that American mechanic who was found dead stuffed in crate (?) worked at this place: Automotive Enterprises?


I thought this guy was a mechanic for the Harley Davidson dealership but dont take that as gospel.


re - reading it, it was a shop that repairs Harleys... big diff... but we still don't know if it was automotive enterprises or not.


Could the Harley shop be opposite the Automotive Enterprises place and Benson saw something suspicious going on over there ???  Maybe Tyler caught on to something and maybe Natalee was wrapped up in the carpet  after carpet was removed ??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Shell on August 09, 2006, 11:52:21 PM
Let's assume D needed to do a quickie recarpeting of his car. Surely there can't be that many places on an Island that size to even buy some suitable for a car and then glue it down. Easy enough for ALE to check into. Why did DK offer that information?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Ono on August 09, 2006, 11:52:38 PM
Quote from: "Appeals"
From DK's 6/13/05 statement:

On Friday two weeks ago he had arainged a lawyer for us.  

For what it is worth, the meeting with Nadira and Paulus and "family" and this day Paulus arranged for the Kalpoes to have a lawyer was Friday June 3rd.


They hopped right on it.


Title: Re: Lying In Aruba, but Not on the Beach
Post by: Ono on August 09, 2006, 11:55:50 PM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Quote from: "Frijole"

And what Arlene's ARROGANT SELF did not understand is that we Americans aren't stupid.  We might not have understood their "system" before but we sure caught on... it's the old "buddy buddy" system.

She taught us well and wouldn't it be ironic if her own nightly briefings on how Aruban Law works is what finally fries these aholes?  (i.e. witnesses cannot lie)  Frankly I don't care if they go to jail for simply lying.. they shouldn't be walking the streets and getting paid money for being arrested.


That's what Joran said kept him in jail all summer.  I think it was in the ACA interview that he said he deserved to spend the summer in jail because he lied.


He was hiding from Natalee's family.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on August 09, 2006, 11:59:52 PM
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "Appeals"
From DK's 6/13/05 statement:

On Friday two weeks ago he had arainged a lawyer for us.  

For what it is worth, the meeting with Nadira and Paulus and "family" and this day Paulus arranged for the Kalpoes to have a lawyer was Friday June 3rd.


They hopped right on it.

And they ALL went, both families on Saturday, June 4, 2005. That was before the guards were arrested.
How many times did Deeepak call the Sloots ( Joran ) to find out of the Dad had any information ? He was not looking for information on Natalee, but rather what information did Paulus have ? ( As in what did the police have ? )


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Anna on August 10, 2006, 12:08:03 AM
Quote from: "Shell"
No mention anywhere I know of as to what, if any porn was seized when ALE did sweeps of the 3 amigos homes. I would love to know if they found any "homemade" films. I assume the 3 amigos are in the habit of popping in a porn film, and base that on the picture we have of them in the car with apparently a porn film on the dvd, and Deepak stated they popped one in with Natalee.


Hi, Shell,
I posted an old article I found today saying Paulus gave the porn DVD Joran showed to the reporter in The Netherlands to Joran.  Said it would help Joran stay awake in class.  Should be on this thread or the last of the one before.

So not only do the parents approve of the son watching porn despite the known consequences, they give him a DVD of it??  At least Paulus did according to that article.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: igsigs on August 10, 2006, 12:08:14 AM
Quote from: "Shell"
No mention anywhere I know of as to what, if any porn was seized when ALE did sweeps of the 3 amigos homes. I would love to know if they found any "homemade" films. I assume the 3 amigos are in the habit of popping in a porn film, and base that on the picture we have of them in the car with apparently a porn film on the dvd, and Deepak stated they popped one in with Natalee.

Native Lingo said porn was found during the search of Joran's appt.

She was a good source.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on August 10, 2006, 12:09:18 AM
Good Evening Monkeys! Just got caught up after server being down due to some very bad weather and open house at sons school. I so appreciate all the work that has been put into the statements.....

Thanks klaas and red!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on August 10, 2006, 12:10:43 AM
We have a loss of time with Deepak stories.  
We have him waiting on a call from Joran which he should not wait for.
We have Joran calling him but he did not answer the call.
We have text messages.
We have an 8+ minute phone call that is not explained.
We have one car with tinted windows, one without.
We have a car with chocolate and no evidence Natalee ever existed there.
We have a white car following them and a white car later seen.
We have Joran mentioning emptying a cup.
Deepak mentions throwing cups out.
We have Paulus calling Joran before the Twittys arrive at their house.
We have Joran telling Deepak a story they will tell and stick to it.
Deepak meets with Wever, Joran, et al while gambing.
They leave one gambling joint for another.
Deepak urinates far too much.
There are ants in the car.
The car is seen going toward Montaja (Is this true? I am beginning to question that statement, not because AG said it but her source cold be ?
We have them admitting to putting a porn video in and Natalee in the car.
They were trying to recruit a girl to to with them to meet these girls? why?
We have all "that shit" they are going to find if they find the girl.
We have questions about carpeting in a car.
Was a stereo taken out of one car and put into another?
Chocolate could be coke in the car both come from cacco bean.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Anna on August 10, 2006, 12:18:13 AM
Quote from: "Bumper"
I am also going to send him a little background on one of Aruba's most upstanding citizens, Michael Posner, as well.

I remember some were looking into Posner's background.  He was raised around the Chicago area and his family still lives there.  On an internet search, he was sent to Aruba to look after the mafia's gambling interests there.  He bought his first casino on Curacao.  He was involved in prostitution in Chicago.  He did spend time in prison too but I don't know what the exactly conviction was for.


Bumper,

Welcome!  Any help is setting the record straight on this is soooo appreciated.  Like Ms Marple said I even have hopes of it snowballing into at least a travel advisory as they deceive with false statistics and claim far fewer crimes than are reported all over their newspapers replete with lurid photos.

Posner was convicted under the RICCO act which is basically racketeering which includes a large number of illegal activities.  He was one of the Chicago mob bosses in its heyday when things like Murder Mansion were taking place, a place the owners were found murdered because the mob wanted their house and executions were carried out there later.  The whole mob was called The Good Ship Lollipop and I forget why right now but it was a crime infested lot and took tremendous effort to clean up.

I will post a little on Posner if I can find it.

Yes, USAToday has done a dreadful disservice to travelers and I have to wonder if they have an angle to this.  Has the Aruban tourist industry bought huge amounts of ads from them or something?

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on August 10, 2006, 12:20:27 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "Bumper"
I am also going to send him a little background on one of Aruba's most upstanding citizens, Michael Posner, as well.

I remember some were looking into Posner's background.  He was raised around the Chicago area and his family still lives there.  On an internet search, he was sent to Aruba to look after the mafia's gambling interests there.  He bought his first casino on Curacao.  He was involved in prostitution in Chicago.  He did spend time in prison too but I don't know what the exactly conviction was for.


Bumper,

Welcome!  Any help is setting the record straight on this is soooo appreciated.  Like Ms Marple said I even have hopes of it snowballing into at least a travel advisory as they deceive with false statistics and claim far fewer crimes than are reported all over their newspapers replete with lurid photos.

Posner was convicted under the RICCO act which is basically racketeering which includes a large number of illegal activities.  He was one of the Chicago mob bosses in its heyday when things like Murder Mansion were taking place, a place the owners were found murdered because the mob wanted their house and executions were carried out there later.  The whole mob was called The Good Ship Lollipop and I forget why right now but it was a crime infested lot and took tremendous effort to clean up.

I will post a little on Posner if I can find it.

Yes, USAToday has done a dreadful disservice to travelers and I have to wonder if they have an angle to this.  Has the Aruban tourist industry bought huge amounts of ads from them or something?

.


That was right, Anna.  Like Dillinger, they could not get him on anything else so they got him on the RICCO act.  There was plenty more, but that was what they could "clearly" prosecute him under, racateering.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Anna on August 10, 2006, 12:21:21 AM
.
If the internal links work on this, you should be able to click on Posner's name and go to a site that explains more about his nefarious dealings.  Did he go to Aruba where online porn is legal as is gambling both in the casino and online for he is one of the first to go online and remains one of the largest.


Monday, October 17, 2005
Government has its hand over Michael Posner’s head? Notorious Chicago figure active in Aruba casino
DIARIO Aruba
10/17/2005

ORANJESTAD (AAN): Some time ago DIARIO found information regarding the manager of the Holiday Inn’s Excelsior Casino and people have been calling out to ask how a figure with a criminal past of such an extent can be active in the casino industry of Aruba.

His name? Michael Posner, owner (or one of the owners) of the Brickel Hotel situated in front of the big hotels in Malmok. In the past he was arrested in the state of Illinois for violation of the Ricco Act (racketeering) and because he was also involved in the world of prostitution.

He was condemned to 10 years in prison, but apparently he served 8 out of the 10 years. He appealed his case and lost the appeal! After he was released he was on parole for 5 years. His name is also mentioned as an associate of a notorious family.

DIARIO knows that the government is at the height of such people, and asks how he can be active in the casino industry of Aruba. How did he find a permit to work in this branch with the background that he has? How has the Minister of Justice still not taken action against him? Now that his criminal past is known, what is the government waiting for to take him out of Aruba?

During the [election] campaign which recently came to an end, many comments and rumours were circulating regarding contributions to certain politicians, including those in the [current] government. DIARIO hopes that the issue of campaign moneys remain a rumour, because if true, then there are more politicians for sale than is [already] apparent.

The presence of Michael Posner in the Aruba casino industry, with the criminal past that he has, does not speak well of the judicial control system, nor that of National Security, nor of those in charge to check the background of those who work in the tourism industry of Aruba.

This is the damage that one person with such a bad reputation, who was incarcerated during 8 years, who is associated with a notorious family in America, can cause to the tourism of Aruba.

[translated by Getagrip]


// posted by Getagrip @ 10/17/2005 09:43:00 PM


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on August 10, 2006, 12:22:41 AM
ILLEGAL

It is illegal to reprint this article or post on the internet, so I recommend you all go here and read it.  

http://www.ipsn.org/lolli1.html


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Anna on August 10, 2006, 12:26:38 AM
The Posner link did not work so here is where it would have taken you if it had worked:

http://www.ipsn.org/lolli1.html

Remember that he actually served eight years of a ten year sentence which is pretty good for mobsters as they always get away with so much.

He has definitely been linked to online gambling and his organization is rated a Class C which is not very good.  Not sure why, maybe they cheat.  And are sanctioned by some horse-racing organizations, too.  Sounds like he still likes to turn a fast and crooked dollar and who is going to challenge him on it? Why did he pick Aruba?  Could it be because it was just so ready to go along with graft and corruption and he knew anything goes there?

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Anna on August 10, 2006, 12:29:59 AM
.
I have never started a thread for anything but think I may try to start one for the murder count in Aruba.  I think this is important for we need this for more than the USAToday man.

We need it for compare and contrast what actually happens versus what is reported for our own Departments of State and Justice and to have to send to our Senators and Congressmen and Condi and everybody else to prove that they are being deceitful about the crime rate on that island.

Travel Industry needs to know that this low murder rate is a joke and it is on THEM!   :evil:

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on August 10, 2006, 12:30:16 AM
If you notice, the RU posters like to bring up Jossy's connections to crime.  It was cigarettes.  Posner makes Jossy look like a case of kindergarten play.

Jossy's family members, and Jossy may not have even been involved, was not involved with the same level of crime as Posner.  Two way different


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Anna on August 10, 2006, 12:31:18 AM
.
Well, Tyler,

Did we chase everybody away??   :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on August 10, 2006, 12:31:54 AM
:oops: I guess so.   :oops:  I have things to do so I will BBL.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Ono on August 10, 2006, 12:36:43 AM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "Appeals"
From DK's 6/13/05 statement:

On Friday two weeks ago he had arainged a lawyer for us.  

For what it is worth, the meeting with Nadira and Paulus and "family" and this day Paulus arranged for the Kalpoes to have a lawyer was Friday June 3rd.


They hopped right on it.

And they ALL went, both families on Saturday, June 4, 2005. That was before the guards were arrested.
How many times did Deeepak call the Sloots ( Joran ) to find out of the Dad had any information ? He was not looking for information on Natalee, but rather what information did Paulus have ? ( As in what did the police have ? )


It just all screams guilt like wildfire.  This is so frustrating...not one single person involved has a conscience. Not one.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Ono on August 10, 2006, 12:40:58 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "Shell"
No mention anywhere I know of as to what, if any porn was seized when ALE did sweeps of the 3 amigos homes. I would love to know if they found any "homemade" films. I assume the 3 amigos are in the habit of popping in a porn film, and base that on the picture we have of them in the car with apparently a porn film on the dvd, and Deepak stated they popped one in with Natalee.


Hi, Shell,
I posted an old article I found today saying Paulus gave the porn DVD Joran showed to the reporter in The Netherlands to Joran.  Said it would help Joran stay awake in class.  Should be on this thread or the last of the one before.

So not only do the parents approve of the son watching porn despite the known consequences, they give him a DVD of it??  At least Paulus did according to that article.

.


I still am of the opinion that Joran, etc. had a little homegrown porno video business going and the Kalpoes worked for him...I just do not believe they were social friends. It was strictly business between those three. Others are involved as well.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: igsigs on August 10, 2006, 12:46:49 AM
BFN has some new statements posted. I think i will wait for Klaas to bring them over before commenting.

The lies and contradictions continue. Just a ton of garbage being spewed by J2K.

Dompig had one thing right...GUILTY AS HELL.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Ono on August 10, 2006, 12:58:46 AM
Quote from: "igsigs"
BFN has some new statements posted. I think i will wait for Klaas to bring them over before commenting.

The lies and contradictions continue. Just a ton of garbage being spewed by J2K.

Dompig had one thing right...GUILTY AS HELL.


It's draining and heavily confusing but you're right...GUILTY AS HELL comes through loud and clear.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on August 10, 2006, 01:07:17 AM
Quote from: "igsigs"
BFN has some new statements posted. I think i will wait for Klaas to bring them over before commenting.

The lies and contradictions continue. Just a ton of garbage being spewed by J2K.

Dompig had one thing right...GUILTY AS HELL.


I've brought over the English version of the 2 new statements that BFN has just posted.  They are in 2 new announcement threads.  Joran 6/14 and Deepak 6/16.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: robots on August 10, 2006, 01:12:14 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "igsigs"
BFN has some new statements posted. I think i will wait for Klaas to bring them over before commenting.

The lies and contradictions continue. Just a ton of garbage being spewed by J2K.

Dompig had one thing right...GUILTY AS HELL.


I've brought over the English version of the 2 new statements that BFN has just posted.  They are in 2 new announcement threads.  Joran 6/14 and Deepak 6/16.



thanks 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on August 10, 2006, 01:12:36 AM
(http://i64.photobucket.com/albums/h191/Kat_Gram/map.jpg)
Another map.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on August 10, 2006, 01:14:57 AM
PROSECUTE WITHOUT A BODY

ORANJESTAD, ARUBA, 6/30/05

Aruba's attorney general said Thursday she could prosecute a case in the disappearance of Natalee Holloway even if the Alabama teenager's body is not found.

Caren Janssen also said investigators have found no evidence to suggest that the 18-year-old Holloway, who disappeared May 30, was dead.

"There are no traces or facts to come to the conclusion that Natalee is no longer alive," Janssen told The Associated Press in a telephone interview.

Janssen declined to reveal Thursday what other evidence investigators might have.

Massive searches by FBI agents, Dutch Marines, Aruban police and thousands of islanders have produced no trace of Holloway, who was celebrating her graduation from high school in Mountain Brook, Ala., when she disappeared.

...Holloway's stepfather, George "Jug" Twitty, said the family was not surprised by Janssen's comments and was not losing hope the truth would be found.

"We may have no physical evidence, but there is a lot of other evidence of what may have happened in this case," Twitty told the AP.

Janssen, who has been tightlipped during the investigation, said she had decided to speak out because "there has been so much misinformation in the American press."

"I'm the lead prosecutor and I want to show that we are not a bunch of cowboys here," she said.

Janssen declined to be more specific about what she believed had been reported inaccurately.

Paul van der Sloot, an island judicial official, was arrested June 23 but released a few days later when a judge ruled there was not enough evidence to hold him.

Janssen said the elder van der Sloot gave his son and the Kalpoe brothers legal advice, telling them that "without a body there is no case."

"He confirmed to me that he told them that a few days after she disappeared," Janssen told the AP.

Janssen also alleged Paul van der Sloot, a 52-year-old judge in training in Aruba, obstructed authorities' investigation by asking one of his son's friends, who had been interrogated, what he told police.

But Janssen said Paul van der Sloot was detained for being a suspect in the disappearance, not for obstructing the investigation.

Janssen decided to give this information because she's concerned about the impression the American media are giving the rest of the world about Aruba.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on August 10, 2006, 01:23:29 AM
I meant to add - there is a SATISH June 11th statement posted also which is farely long.  This is in a thread in the forum, not the FP yet.  I'm going to read it now.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on August 10, 2006, 01:37:00 AM
When we had arrived at the "lighthouse" my brother asked Joran if the girl wanted to see the "lighthouse". Joran then said that he didn't think she would want to see it because she had fallen asleep. At that moment I turned around and saw that the girl was lying on Joran's lap and that she was sleeping. Joran had awakened the girl. Joran then told my brother that he didn't think that the girl would want to see the "lighthouse". The girl had been awake then. Joran then asked the girl if she was staying in the Holiday Inn hotel. The girl answered that she was staying at the Holiday Inn hotel. Joran then said to my brother that he should drive to the Holiday Inn hotel to drop off the girl. My brother then drove in the direction of the Holiday Inn hotel. To your question whether the girl had said something after she had woken up I have to tell you that I did not pay attention. On the way to the Holiday Inn Hotel Joran told my brother to turn right at some point. At Joran's request my brother turned right and drove into the street just north of the Marriot Hotel. My brother continued driving up the street until Joran said that he should stop the car. My brother then brought the car to a full stop. My brother asked Joran how he was going to get home. Joran answered that he would find a way to get home. My brother asked Joran if he was sure he would find another way to get home. Joran said that he was sure that he would find a way to get home. At that moment it was approximately 01.45 hours on May 30th 2005. The girl and Joran then got out of the car. Joran and the girl walked towards the beach. Joran and the girl had put their arms around each other while they walked. To your question whether the girl had been drunk and how the girl was walking I can say the following. The girl was at that time well with it and was walking fine too. After we had driven out of this street I asked my brother to slow down and I had thrown the "Yard' cup out of the car on the right side of the road. After that we drove towards our house. To your question as to what direction we had taken when we drove home I have the answer you the following. I cannot remember for sure, but I think we took the road through Tanki Leendert to get home.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on August 10, 2006, 01:39:30 AM
After finishing reading the latest posting of Deepak's statement, I found myself questioning the signifigance of the portion in which he describes the sound system work done on his car by "Automotive Enterprises", and how it relates to the police van tapes.

Knowing we have some very intelligent and insighful members on this board, anyone care to enlighten me on their theories?  ;)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on August 10, 2006, 01:46:22 AM
I say there are two different cars involved and he had his stereo system moved from one car to another, from the car with tinted windows to one without tinted windows, and the one with tinted windows is the one with blood and the one without tinted windows is the one with chocolate.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on August 10, 2006, 01:48:06 AM
TURN TO FOX.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: igsigs on August 10, 2006, 01:48:52 AM
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
After finishing reading the latest posting of Deepak's statement, I found myself questioning the signifigance of the portion in which he describes the sound system work done on his car by "Automotive Enterprises", and how it relates to the police van tapes.

Knowing we have some very intelligent and insighful members on this board, anyone care to enlighten me on their theories?  ;)


Hi Strike. San and Blah and others had some very informed and interesting opinions on just this topic about 10 pages back. Mostly that it was odd that Deepak proferred the info unsolicited...and that the work he mentions does match up with a typical sound system installation.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on August 10, 2006, 01:50:13 AM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
I say there are two different cars involved and he had his stereo system moved from one car to another, from the car with tinted windows to one without tinted windows, and the one with tinted windows is the one with blood and the one without tinted windows is the one with chocolate.


Hey Tyler!!  ;)

So, you're saying that they had access to (2) identical vehicles with & without tinted windows?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on August 10, 2006, 01:51:04 AM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
TURN TO FOX.


Was something on Fox?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: igsigs on August 10, 2006, 01:52:59 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
TURN TO FOX.


Was something on Fox?


Brits "disrupted" a terror plot to blow up 20 planes.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on August 10, 2006, 01:53:02 AM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
TURN TO FOX.


WOW!!  Thanks for the heads up Tyler!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: spooky112483 on August 10, 2006, 01:53:55 AM
Still reading back but I wanted to add my 2 cents re the car....
VIN stickers can be found all over the car but not on the parts the we are talking about (carpet, headliner, seats) those parts can be changed out without showing a VIN sticker. Just an example: right now we have a Honda Odyssey van and the captain seat behind the driver seat had been replaced when we bought it at auction. the seat was a different shade of gray, had a different pattern and stiching which made it very difficult for us to find a seat to replace it that would match. even seat covers of the same color would have different stiching or pattern.
What was said earlier about the carpet molding to the car and not needing glue is correct. Carpet and headliner are time consuming to replace but are not difficult. Same with seats as long as they match up. We found out that Honda can have at least 3 different patterns/shades/stiching for one car. Now this may not be true of a Honda accord in the same year model of Deepaks (which I dont think we know). I guess I am wondering if Automotives Enterprises or some other place on Aruba would have this kind of stuff available without having to order it from somewhere off the island?
just what I know from my experiance.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on August 10, 2006, 01:59:41 AM
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
TURN TO FOX.


WOW!!  Thanks for the heads up Tyler!


Carried on small WMD in luggage, all planes to USA from Great Britain.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on August 10, 2006, 02:01:04 AM
It has been in the planning for 8-9 months.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on August 10, 2006, 02:02:09 AM
Quote from: "spooky112483"
Still reading back but I wanted to add my 2 cents re the car....
VIN stickers can be found all over the car but not on the parts the we are talking about (carpet, headliner, seats) those parts can be changed out without showing a VIN sticker. Just an example: right now we have a Honda Odyssey van and the captain seat behind the driver seat had been replaced when we bought it at auction. the seat was a different shade of gray, had a different pattern and stiching which made it very difficult for us to find a seat to replace it that would match. even seat covers of the same color would have different stiching or pattern.
What was said earlier about the carpet molding to the car and not needing glue is correct. Carpet and headliner are time consuming to replace but are not difficult. Same with seats as long as they match up. We found out that Honda can have at least 3 different patterns/shades/stiching for one car. Now this may not be true of a Honda accord in the same year model of Deepaks (which I dont think we know). I guess I am wondering if Automotives Enterprises or some other place on Aruba would have this kind of stuff available without having to order it from somewhere off the island?
just what I know from my experiance.


Hey Spook!!  ;)

You're absolutely right about what you stated above.  I would add, however, that although those parts you described aren't bundled into the VIN, they are all catalogues as part of the original vehicle when it was manufactured.  My understanding is that one could determine that certain parts of the vehicle were changed out (from it's original condition) by way of upgrades and such...

I'm not sold on the "multiple, identical vehicle" theory.  I'm just curious as to what the conenction was/is regarding the "Automotive Enterprises" as it pertains to the statement and the police van tape transcripts...

Your thoughts?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: spooky112483 on August 10, 2006, 02:17:16 AM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
I say there are two different cars involved and he had his stereo system moved from one car to another, from the car with tinted windows to one without tinted windows, and the one with tinted windows is the one with blood and the one without tinted windows is the one with chocolate.

at the very least I think the portions of the car that were sent to Holland were NOT from Deepaks car (the car that Natalee was in that night).
Were they changed out? or did Aruba just send some other car parts to NL? either way, they were not the parts that were in that car that night.
the real parts should contain the spilled Cherry Coke(that Depak talks about) and Natalees hair fibers. the NL came back with Chocolat and cleaning fluid an no Natalee fibers.....two completly dif. car parts imo


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on August 10, 2006, 02:18:20 AM
DID THEY EVER SAY THEY ALL HAD SEX WITH NATALEE ? WHERE ARE THOSE STATEMENTS?

8/31/05
 GRACE: Welcome back, everybody. We are live in Aruba. And the latest in the Natalee Holloway missing girl case.

Today, D-Day, Joran Van Der Sloot, the chief suspect in the case, a judge`s son, back in court along with his running buddies, the Kalpoe brothers. Tonight from Aruba, "Diario" reporter Giovani lane. In West Tampa, Florida, Joe Episcopo. Also with us, CNN correspondent Susan Candiotti and Renee Rockwell joining us out of Atlanta, defense attorney.

To Susan Candiotti, bring us up-to-date, Susan.

SUSAN CANDIOTTI, CNN CORRESPONDENT: Nancy, a busy day in court today. In fact, they were in there practically the entire day. And this day, Joran, along with the Kalpoe brothers, were questioned together by the judge.

The judge trying to decide whether Joran can be held beyond that 120- day limit. The judge must decide by September the 4th whether the prosecutors have enough, quote, unquote, "new evidence" to keep him behind bars while the investigation continues.

Now, during their presentation, prosecutors presented about 300 pages of evidence. Key among them, statements from Joran, as well as the Kalpoe brothers, that they allegedly had sex with Natalee Holloway.

And they also entered into evidence that gardener`s statement -- this is the man who said that he saw the three of them in a car parked by the pond the night that Natalee disappeared, but at a time that would call into question where they were when they said they were at that particular hour of the night.

And then, Nancy, something else was introduced into evidence, that the defense attorneys claim is not new, has been in the file for two months, and they can`t understand what this has to do with Natalee`s disappearance. And I`m a little uncertain about that, as well.

It involves another young man who law enforcement tells me has nothing to do with Natalee`s disappearance, who took some photographs of a 14-year- old girl, described as of a provocative nature, while Joran supposedly watched, as well as Deepak and a couple other young girls. Again, I`m not clear what this has to do with the case directly.

GRACE: OK, I think I may know. Susan, does this guy, this fourth suspect, does he live anywhere near Joran Van Der Sloot, or did they know each other before this?

CANDIOTTI: He`s described as Joran`s best friend, according to the defense attorney.

GRACE: OK, all right. I think I may have cracked the mystery.

To Joe Episcopo, this guy, FEZ (ph), is charged with taking photos of a 14-year-old girl. Hello, she`s got on a bikini. She`s not nude, all right, although they`re saying the photos are provocative. Clearly, he knows something about the case. So they arrest him on these photos and squeeze him to tell the truth?

JOE EPISCOPO, DEFENSE ATTORNEY: Clearly, he knows something about the case because of that? I doubt it.

GRACE: I`m asking you to divine why this guy is arrested and in the files is connected to this case. Let`s put on our thinking cap.

EPISCOPO: Yes. I`ll tell you why. They`re trumped-up charges because they can`t prove the primary case. They`re arresting people on suspicions because they can`t plea bargain, they can`t grant immunity. They`re not going to solve this case they way they`re doing it.

GRACE: OK, that helps.

Let`s go to Renee Rockwell. Got a theory?

RENEE ROCKWELL, DEFENSE ATTORNEY: Nancy, the only thing that I have is maybe Joran and the Kalpoe brothers have been involved with some other young girls, doing other things, and maybe they`re just afraid that this guy`s going to come forward and talk about it, trying to get himself or explain himself out of these pictures of these young girls. Only thing I can think of.

GRACE: And, thereby, turn into a witness, not necessarily a suspect, in the Natalee Holloway case.

Take a listen to this.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

PAULUS VAN DER SLOOT, FATHER OF JORAN VAN DER SLOOT: He wants to go home. He feels he hasn`t done anything wrong. He is maintaining his innocence.

And, you know, he has been deprived of his freedom for almost three months. He misses his home, his parents. And he want to go home. So that this, I believe, you know, what broke him down a little bit.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

GRACE: Joran Van Der Sloot shed a tear, said he wants to go home? I sent this to his family last night. Now this one`s for you, Joran Van Der Sloot. You`re crying? What do you think Natalee`s family has been through?

Renee, not that it`s the first time I`ve been burned in effigy at a courthouse before, but take a look at this.

Got that video? There you go. Ouch!

ROCKWELL: Nancy, is there any such thing as bad publicity?

GRACE: Well, I don`t know about that, but, you know, the truth hurts. And instead of holding up posters about me and CNN, you`d think they`d be trying to find Natalee Holloway and trying to find the truth of this case.

ROCKWELL: Is this to me?

GRACE: Yes.

ROCKWELL: Nancy, let`s talk about Aruba just a little bit. We know a couple of things. They don`t have juries. They don`t have the death penalty. Like Episcopo said, they don`t have deals, no immunity.

What you have a situation is where you`re going to have a panel of judges looking at everything that`s been gathered up. They can look at the fact that they`ve changed their story so many times. They can look at the fact that maybe he`s going to plead silence right now and not explain it, but then compare other stories that he`s contradicted himself.

I know one thing, that Deepak`s attorney has said that there`s no new evidence against Deepak. Therefore, he should be released, like he was released last time. But then you have Satish`s attorney, who said that something Satish said has contradicted statements that Joran and Deepak have said. So, therefore, they`re all back in court trying to straighten the story out. Just doesn`t look good.

GRACE: To Giovani Lane with "Diario" newspaper. Giovani, she`s right. There was another conflict in the three statements today between the Kalpoes and Joran Van Der Sloot. The judge brought them back in to ask them about it.

Do we know what the conflict was, Giovani?

GIOVANI LANE, "DIARIO" REPORTER: Well, the lawyers didn`t say anything about it. Only thing I know is that Zeppenveldt, one of Joran`s lawyers -- I mean Satish`s lawyer, sorry -- he explained that the police had probably forgotten that Joran must not have been taken away from the court.

So, because at the last part of the case was that the three guys would have been confronted with each other. So, at first they were questioning them individually.

And the last part of the whole day was going to be that all were going to be together in court. And the police had to go back and get Joran and bring him back and his lawyers. That`s why his lawyers came back.

One thing Zeppenveldt said that was a little -- I noticed, he said that the girl from the picture had said that Satish was not there during this shoot, you know, was not on the picture, was not one of the guys.

But he did not say if one of the other guys was mentioned by the girl. And that`s one thing we want to try to find out.

GRACE: Quick break, everybody.

Very quickly to tonight`s "All-Points Bulletin."

FBI and law enforcement across the country on the lookout for John Patrick Addis, wanted in connection with the `95 kidnap and murder of Joanne Albanese, 39, in Nevada.

Addis, 54, 6`1", 190 pounds, light brown hair, blue-green eyes. If you have any info on John Patrick Addis, call the FBI, 702-385-1281.

Local news next for some of you, but we`ll all be right back. And remember, live coverage of an accused wife accused of killing her husband, 3:00 to 5:00 Eastern, Court TV.

Please stay with us as we remember Sergeant Damion Campbell, 23, an American hero.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

GRACE: We at NANCY GRACE want very much to help in our own way, solve unsolved homicides, find missing people. Take a look at Eric Alexander, just 24 years old, in a car with his girlfriend, January 2004, Richmond, Virginia.

Stopped at an intersection, driver in front gets out and shoots. Police still have not found Eric`s killer. If you have information on Eric Alexander, call the Carole Sund Carrington Foundation toll free, 888-813- 8389. Help us.

Very quickly, back to Giovani Lane with Diario. Giovani, how is Jossy Mansur?

LANE: Well, he told me specifically to say hi to Nancy for him, and he says he`s going to be on tomorrow for sure. He`s kind of a little tired. He`s busy with other stuff, you know, also the case in court and his job. He has to handle certain things, but he`s going to be tomorrow on your show.

GRACE: OK. Tell Jossy, we want to see him -- you`re great -- but we want to see Jossy in the flesh.

Very quickly to Susan Candiotti with CNN correspondent on the case from the beginning. Susan, please tell me I`m wrong about this -- I`ve gotten information from a source -- but that the new Dutch interrogators, the new technique is to be nice to the Kalpoes and Joran Van Der Sloot. That`s the secret weapon?

CANDIOTTI: Well, that`s possible. We don`t really know. This is simply according to a couple of the people who have been picked up and/or re-interviewed by these people. For example, Steven Croes, the deejay, told us that, this time when he was interviewed by the interrogators, they were, in his words, much nicer to him than they were the last time.

Also, we heard that, this time, when the Kalpoe brothers were re- arrested just last Friday, that, instead of being rousted from their sleep and dragged off to jail, this time, they were allowed to get dressed, et cetera, et cetera, before they left.

You know, Nancy, I don`t know what the new strategy is, but it`s an observation, anyway.

GRACE: And very quickly, Susan, when do with we get a ruling on whether Van Der Sloot can be kept longer?

CANDIOTTI: You would think it would have to come by Friday at the latest, because the clock`s ticking.

GRACE: OK, thank you, friend. Susan Candiotti joining us.

I want to thank all of my guests tonight. But my biggest thank you, to you, for being with us, inviting us into your home.

Coming up, headlines from all around the world, Larry on CNN. I`m Nancy Grace, signing off for tonight. Hope to see you right here tomorrow night, 8:00 sharp Eastern. Until then, good night, friend.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: spooky112483 on August 10, 2006, 02:18:59 AM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
TURN TO FOX.


WOW!!  Thanks for the heads up Tyler!


Carried on small WMD in luggage, all planes to USA from Great Britain.


 :shock:
dang I was watching General Hospital.
I'll go check now


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: spooky112483 on August 10, 2006, 02:22:34 AM
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "spooky112483"
Still reading back but I wanted to add my 2 cents re the car....
VIN stickers can be found all over the car but not on the parts the we are talking about (carpet, headliner, seats) those parts can be changed out without showing a VIN sticker. Just an example: right now we have a Honda Odyssey van and the captain seat behind the driver seat had been replaced when we bought it at auction. the seat was a different shade of gray, had a different pattern and stiching which made it very difficult for us to find a seat to replace it that would match. even seat covers of the same color would have different stiching or pattern.
What was said earlier about the carpet molding to the car and not needing glue is correct. Carpet and headliner are time consuming to replace but are not difficult. Same with seats as long as they match up. We found out that Honda can have at least 3 different patterns/shades/stiching for one car. Now this may not be true of a Honda accord in the same year model of Deepaks (which I dont think we know). I guess I am wondering if Automotives Enterprises or some other place on Aruba would have this kind of stuff available without having to order it from somewhere off the island?
just what I know from my experiance.


Hey Spook!!  ;)

You're absolutely right about what you stated above.  I would add, however, that although those parts you described aren't bundled into the VIN, they are all catalogues as part of the original vehicle when it was manufactured.  My understanding is that one could determine that certain parts of the vehicle were changed out (from it's original condition) by way of upgrades and such...

I'm not sold on the "multiple, identical vehicle" theory.  I'm just curious as to what the conenction was/is regarding the "Automotive Enterprises" as it pertains to the statement and the police van tape transcripts...

Your thoughts?


I will ask tomorrow but I am pretty sure that on a Honda if a carpet, headliner, or seat were to be changed out (if properly done) you would not be able to tell by VIN or otherwise) Honda does put VIN stickers on each part of the car as in hood trunk fenders bumpers doors....but I dont think the individual interior parts. but will ask tomorrow.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on August 10, 2006, 02:25:55 AM
Quote from: "spooky112483"
I will ask tomorrow but I am pretty sure that on a Honda if a carpet, headliner, or seat were to be changed out (if properly done) you would not be able to tell by VIN or otherwise) Honda does put VIN stickers on each part of the car as in hood trunk fenders bumpers doors....but I dont think the individual interior parts. but will ask tomorrow.


Well, if anyone wouild be able to find out, it'd be you.  You're the expert...;)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on August 10, 2006, 02:26:31 AM
Those planes would have been planes headed to USA.  FBI has been informed and will be making a statement soon.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: sb on August 10, 2006, 02:28:54 AM
Thanks Tyler, I'm going to watch Fox for a few, then bed.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: spooky112483 on August 10, 2006, 02:30:51 AM
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "spooky112483"
I will ask tomorrow but I am pretty sure that on a Honda if a carpet, headliner, or seat were to be changed out (if properly done) you would not be able to tell by VIN or otherwise) Honda does put VIN stickers on each part of the car as in hood trunk fenders bumpers doors....but I dont think the individual interior parts. but will ask tomorrow.


Well, if anyone wouild be able to find out, it'd be you.  You're the expert...;)


not at all an expert but lucky to be at a job where I can ask these particular questions :wink:
how you doin'?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: spooky112483 on August 10, 2006, 02:31:46 AM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Those planes would have been planes headed to USA.  FBI has been informed and will be making a statement soon.


thanks Tyler. I'm sure you and I will be swapping some emails tomorrow :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on August 10, 2006, 02:35:31 AM
Quote from: "spooky112483"
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "spooky112483"
I will ask tomorrow but I am pretty sure that on a Honda if a carpet, headliner, or seat were to be changed out (if properly done) you would not be able to tell by VIN or otherwise) Honda does put VIN stickers on each part of the car as in hood trunk fenders bumpers doors....but I dont think the individual interior parts. but will ask tomorrow.


Well, if anyone wouild be able to find out, it'd be you.  You're the expert...;)


not at all an expert but lucky to be at a job where I can ask these particular questions :wink:
how you doin'?


I'm doin' pretty good!  Still trying to get over this darn cold, but otherwise...ok?  Thanks for asking!  ;)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: spooky112483 on August 10, 2006, 02:36:53 AM
"bring down aircraft thu MID FLIGHT EXPLOSIONS"!!!!!!!!!!!! :shock:  :shock:  :shock:
Way to go Brit police and all involved in catching this


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Anna on August 10, 2006, 02:37:09 AM
Quote from: "spooky112483"
[I will ask tomorrow but I am pretty sure that on a Honda if a carpet, headliner, or seat were to be changed out (if properly done) you would not be able to tell by VIN or otherwise) Honda does put VIN stickers on each part of the car as in hood trunk fenders bumpers doors....but I dont think the individual interior parts. but will ask tomorrow.


I think you are correct, Spooky.  I was just trying to state why it would be difficult to just send a totally different car.  All the interior is prolly considered trim and would not have VIN numbers.  Once I was shocked to learn an inside door handle on a car is "trim" and not under warranty even if it falls off in your hand.  

VIN number is clearly visible through front windshield.  Too many FBI strolling around to change entire car even if ALE would go along with it.  And would possibly attract attention to try to change all records all the way back for tags, mortgage on the car or whatever you call payments, things like that.  I think they changed it out.  

As for no trace of Natalee being found, I think they did very superficial check and there would be nothing on the new interior.  Could have just come from another car of same make/model as have read it was very common on the island, did not have to be brand new stuff.

Enterprise Automotives seems connected to fake flat tire of some sort, not sure what that is all about.  Think we need another piece of the puzzle.

Going to check Fox for updates. . . . . .


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on August 10, 2006, 02:37:18 AM
Quote from: "spooky112483"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Those planes would have been planes headed to USA.  FBI has been informed and will be making a statement soon.


thanks Tyler. I'm sure you and I will be swapping some emails tomorrow :wink:


absolutely.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: spooky112483 on August 10, 2006, 02:38:32 AM
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "spooky112483"
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "spooky112483"
I will ask tomorrow but I am pretty sure that on a Honda if a carpet, headliner, or seat were to be changed out (if properly done) you would not be able to tell by VIN or otherwise) Honda does put VIN stickers on each part of the car as in hood trunk fenders bumpers doors....but I dont think the individual interior parts. but will ask tomorrow.


Well, if anyone wouild be able to find out, it'd be you.  You're the expert...;)


not at all an expert but lucky to be at a job where I can ask these particular questions :wink:
how you doin'?


I'm doin' pretty good!  Still trying to get over this darn cold, but otherwise...ok?  Thanks for asking!  ;)

aww, I hope you feel better soon hon! :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: oldfart on August 10, 2006, 02:39:13 AM
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
After finishing reading the latest posting of Deepak's statement, I found myself questioning the significance of the portion in which he describes the sound system work done on his car by "Automotive Enterprises", and how it relates to the police van tapes.

Knowing we have some very intelligent and insighful members on this board, anyone care to enlighten me on their theories?  ;)


ThirdStrike
Popping in for just a post to respond to your question  which I semi asked earlier

Why would he bring this up when ONLY asked about who was the prior owner???
To me he was anticipating a question about the carpet in the his car
being new / replaced being asked but of course they never followed up on why he volunteered this info :twisted:
G'Nie all  
SYB

OldFart
ps check out the music link in the sig line  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: spooky112483 on August 10, 2006, 02:45:20 AM
and also to reiterate...you can change out the carpet (it does not contain VIN) it is time consuming and would involve removing seats and console to do so.
yes Anna pretty much all interior is considered "trim".
my example of the Odyssey van seat was just to show that there may be more than one color/pattern/stiching and it may not be easy/quick to find an exact replacement especially on Aruba. but did ALE bother looking that hard at Deepaks seats? i doubt it. i think it more likely that nothing was removed from Deepaks car but yet different parts were simply sent to NL. if we could test Deepaks car now we may find the evidence we seek. wasnt he trying to sell the car?
but this is just my thoughts for today, could change tomorrow  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on August 10, 2006, 02:45:29 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "spooky112483"
[I will ask tomorrow but I am pretty sure that on a Honda if a carpet, headliner, or seat were to be changed out (if properly done) you would not be able to tell by VIN or otherwise) Honda does put VIN stickers on each part of the car as in hood trunk fenders bumpers doors....but I dont think the individual interior parts. but will ask tomorrow.


I think you are correct, Spooky.  I was just trying to state why it would be difficult to just send a totally different car.  All the interior is prolly considered trim and would not have VIN numbers.  Once I was shocked to learn an inside door handle on a car is "trim" and not under warranty even if it falls off in your hand.  

VIN number is clearly visible through front windshield.  Too many FBI strolling around to change entire car even if ALE would go along with it.  And would possibly attract attention to try to change all records all the way back for tags, mortgage on the car or whatever you call payments, things like that.  I think they changed it out.  

As for no trace of Natalee being found, I think they did very superficial check and there would be nothing on the new interior.  Could have just come from another car of same make/model as have read it was very common on the island, did not have to be brand new stuff.

Enterprise Automotives seems connected to fake flat tire of some sort, not sure what that is all about.  Think we need another piece of the puzzle.

Going to check Fox for updates. . . . . .


These are good points Anna!  My question is, unless one believes the crime was commited inside Deepak's vehicle, why else would the ALE, FBI, or anyone else need proof of Natalee being inside of it if that has already been established as fact through eyewitness accounts, as well as admissions by the suspects directly?  Not disputing the possibility that there may be evidence of a crime in that car (blood, tissue, etc), wouldn't one have to believe (as part of their theory) that the crime itself occured in the vehicle in order for any tests related to proving that as fact be relevant in any way?  

I'm just trying to understand the signifigance of the testing of the vehicle as it pertains to this discussion...as well as how it would pertain to other people's theories (including myself) regarding the crime being commited elsewhere...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: msmarple on August 10, 2006, 02:48:38 AM
Okay, my top-of-the-head thoughts on all this --

FREDDY - JVDS didn't have to tell Freddy "the truth" - he only had to tell Freddy the HI story. Freddy entered the picture at some point on that terrible night.

The CAR - I think the elapsed time before J2K were finally arrested, car impounded, etc., was just about enough time to renovate Deepak's car. For whatever other reasons, I am still on a tear about drug consumption being retained in hair .... and aren't we thinking that not a trace of NH was found, although no one disputes that she was in the car?

ANTS - I can verify that even in a closed car, those little black army (sugar) ants can invade in pursuit of an open can of beer, soft drink, or anything that contains sugar. So that may have been a true story.

SECURITY GUARDS RELEASE - Per my notes, MJ was released 6/13 and AJ was released 6/14. I thought that was odd.

INTERESTING - Deepak stated that Natalee "danced beautifully" and did not stumble when she left the stage. Satish stated that she seemed well with it and walking fine when they dropped off her and J at the beach. Clearly the "trash the victim" memo had not yet arrived.

TIMING - In my notes, I have the -
Initial arrival of the "Alabama Posse" at the VDS home at est. 2:00 a.m.
Mass meeting in the VDS driveway at est. 3:00 a.m.
Departure from HI at est. 5:00 a.m.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: spooky112483 on August 10, 2006, 02:54:14 AM
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "spooky112483"
[I will ask tomorrow but I am pretty sure that on a Honda if a carpet, headliner, or seat were to be changed out (if properly done) you would not be able to tell by VIN or otherwise) Honda does put VIN stickers on each part of the car as in hood trunk fenders bumpers doors....but I dont think the individual interior parts. but will ask tomorrow.


I think you are correct, Spooky.  I was just trying to state why it would be difficult to just send a totally different car.  All the interior is prolly considered trim and would not have VIN numbers.  Once I was shocked to learn an inside door handle on a car is "trim" and not under warranty even if it falls off in your hand.  

VIN number is clearly visible through front windshield.  Too many FBI strolling around to change entire car even if ALE would go along with it.  And would possibly attract attention to try to change all records all the way back for tags, mortgage on the car or whatever you call payments, things like that.  I think they changed it out.  

As for no trace of Natalee being found, I think they did very superficial check and there would be nothing on the new interior.  Could have just come from another car of same make/model as have read it was very common on the island, did not have to be brand new stuff.

Enterprise Automotives seems connected to fake flat tire of some sort, not sure what that is all about.  Think we need another piece of the puzzle.

Going to check Fox for updates. . . . . .


These are good points Anna!  My question is, unless one believes the crime was commited inside Deepak's vehicle, why else would the ALE, FBI, or anyone else need proof of Natalee being inside of it if that has already been established as fact through eyewitness accounts, as well as admissions by the suspects directly?  Not disputing the possibility that there may be evidence of a crime in that car (blood, tissue, etc), wouldn't one have to believe (as part of their theory) that the crime itself occured in the vehicle in order for any tests related to proving that as fact be relevant in any way?  

I'm just trying to understand the signifigance of the testing of the vehicle as it pertains to this discussion...as well as how it would pertain to other people's theories (including myself) regarding the crime being commited elsewhere...


well for one there was no evidence stated from ALE or NL that ANY evidence was found that Natalee was even in the car.of course everyone knows she was but yet they never state that not even one hair of hers was found?? no one looking over this car has ever said "yes we found hair and fiber of Natalee in the car" other than the FBI stating "too much blood in car" and NL/ALE stating "chocalot and cleaning fluid"


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: spooky112483 on August 10, 2006, 02:57:59 AM
as many as 20 planes involved??
thinking this could have been 9/11 if we hadnt learned from 9/11
(well some people learned from 9/11)...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Anna on August 10, 2006, 02:58:35 AM
.
Third,
At some point during all these early days, several Aruban officials said there was blood in the car, apparently clearly visible.  Now I may be wrong but it went as high as either the Prime Minister or Minister of Justice saying this as well as the FBI.

Then "poof" not so much as an eyelash.  Some of us just wondering how that happened.  Or it turned into chocolate, etc.

I truly believe the authorities in Aruba contirbuted to all the early rumors with some of their statements.  I have never seen a case where the body was recovered then it wasn't before according to officials.  Newspeople have gotten it wrong before but not those supposedly actually doing the recovering.  In this case, it was the sources not the reporters, etc.

All very strange.  Lots to think about in these statements. . . . .

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Anna on August 10, 2006, 02:59:50 AM
Quote from: "spooky112483"
as many as 20 planes involved??
thinking this could have been 9/11 if we hadnt learned from 9/11
(well some people learned from 9/11)...


And some didn't.. . . . . .  :roll:

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: msmarple on August 10, 2006, 03:01:36 AM
Anna (if you're still here) - You will be amused to learn that I am going to have to CALL the State Dept. tomorrow to get an actual name of somebody with whom to communicate. Re. the travel advisory.

Whoever answers the "Contact Us" emails does not know ...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on August 10, 2006, 03:08:36 AM
ms marple, thank you.  i think after going through my info we agree on times etc


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on August 10, 2006, 03:09:01 AM
just fyi

http://www.weather.com/newscenter/tropical/?from=wxcenter_news


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: msmarple on August 10, 2006, 03:10:36 AM
Oh, and Anna - I have started a Word document on murder on Aruba. I have 5 in 2005 and 3 in 2006 (so far). That we KNOW of.

That's counting (sadly) Natalee, and also Robert Benson (found in container at his place of work - the Harley Davidson guy).

I'm not sure about Benson, though. Conflicting information. Locked container - locked on the inside? What kind of container would that be? Reportedly ruled a suicide, but also saw comments about heart attack.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: msmarple on August 10, 2006, 03:14:35 AM
Also, Anna - I got the same reply from Mr. Grossman that you did. (It was sent at 3:17 a.m. Wed.!)

But I am hoping that it was just his knee-jerk reaction to my first email. At this point I think I've sent 5 to him.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on August 10, 2006, 03:18:27 AM
WHEN I CLICKED ONTO THE LINK IT DID NOT ANY LONGER GO WHERE I WANTED IT TO GO, BUT THIS IS ABOUT THE BOOK IN THE LIBRARY, ARUBA.


Air Force Reserve Reconnaissance Aircraft will investigate a cluster of thundershowers just east of the Lesser Antilles. While the cluster had pulsed down on Tuesday and the surface feature was simply a trough, convection regenerated early Wednesday morning. While light westerly shear is impacting this cluster, a surface low may be able to form if convection can persist. Regardless of whether a depression forms, this cluster will bring a period of showers and gusty winds first impacting Barbados, then the rest of the Windward Islands through Thursday.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: igsigs on August 10, 2006, 03:20:08 AM
Quote from: "msmarple"
Okay, my top-of-the-head thoughts on all this --

FREDDY - JVDS didn't have to tell Freddy "the truth" - he only had to tell Freddy the HI story. Freddy entered the picture at some point on that terrible night.

The CAR - I think the elapsed time before J2K were finally arrested, car impounded, etc., was just about enough time to renovate Deepak's car. For whatever other reasons, I am still on a tear about drug consumption being retained in hair .... and aren't we thinking that not a trace of NH was found, although no one disputes that she was in the car?

ANTS - I can verify that even in a closed car, those little black army (sugar) ants can invade in pursuit of an open can of beer, soft drink, or anything that contains sugar. So that may have been a true story.

SECURITY GUARDS RELEASE - Per my notes, MJ was released 6/13 and AJ was released 6/14. I thought that was odd.

INTERESTING - Deepak stated that Natalee "danced beautifully" and did not stumble when she left the stage. Satish stated that she seemed well with it and walking fine when they dropped off her and J at the beach. Clearly the "trash the victim" memo had not yet arrived.

TIMING - In my notes, I have the -
Initial arrival of the "Alabama Posse" at the VDS home at est. 2:00 a.m.
Mass meeting in the VDS driveway at est. 3:00 a.m.
Departure from HI at est. 5:00 a.m.

Good observations msmarple. I'll add 3...

WATER - both Deepak and Satish now put Joran and Natalee in the ocean.

JORAN WALKING - K's have now left Joran "at the beach".

CELL CALL - Satish(via Deepak) states Joran breathing heavily. Deepak omits breathing part...but states a lot of interference. This is the call Janssen stated was the longest ever between J/D.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: spooky112483 on August 10, 2006, 03:21:02 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "spooky112483"
as many as 20 planes involved??
thinking this could have been 9/11 if we hadnt learned from 9/11
(well some people learned from 9/11)...


And some didn't.. . . . . .  :roll:

.


Yup!
I just emailed my friend over there in London....i need him to tell me what "nappies" and "wheelies" and "fobs" are  :lol:  whatever they are you cant take them on planes today!
Big applause to the Brit police here!!!!!!!!!!!! and any other intellagence involved....uh oh, now a liquid band "could be liquid chemicals"


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: spooky112483 on August 10, 2006, 03:21:59 AM
Quote from: "msmarple"
Anna (if you're still here) - You will be amused to learn that I am going to have to CALL the State Dept. tomorrow to get an actual name of somebody with whom to communicate. Re. the travel advisory.

Whoever answers the "Contact Us" emails does not know ...


HA! not surprised


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: spooky112483 on August 10, 2006, 03:24:08 AM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
WHEN I CLICKED ONTO THE LINK IT DID NOT ANY LONGER GO WHERE I WANTED IT TO GO, BUT THIS IS ABOUT THE BOOK IN THE LIBRARY, ARUBA.


Air Force Reserve Reconnaissance Aircraft will investigate a cluster of thundershowers just east of the Lesser Antilles. While the cluster had pulsed down on Tuesday and the surface feature was simply a trough, convection regenerated early Wednesday morning. While light westerly shear is impacting this cluster, a surface low may be able to form if convection can persist. Regardless of whether a depression forms, this cluster will bring a period of showers and gusty winds first impacting Barbados, then the rest of the Windward Islands through Thursday.


is this todays weather or the time Natalee went missing?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on August 10, 2006, 03:26:05 AM
Quote from: "spooky112483"
Quote from: "msmarple"
Anna (if you're still here) - You will be amused to learn that I am going to have to CALL the State Dept. tomorrow to get an actual name of somebody with whom to communicate. Re. the travel advisory.

Whoever answers the "Contact Us" emails does not know ...


HA! not surprised


The liquid was the chemical that would take down the plane. ???


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on August 10, 2006, 03:27:26 AM
Quote from: "spooky112483"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
WHEN I CLICKED ONTO THE LINK IT DID NOT ANY LONGER GO WHERE I WANTED IT TO GO, BUT THIS IS ABOUT THE BOOK IN THE LIBRARY, ARUBA.


Air Force Reserve Reconnaissance Aircraft will investigate a cluster of thundershowers just east of the Lesser Antilles. While the cluster had pulsed down on Tuesday and the surface feature was simply a trough, convection regenerated early Wednesday morning. While light westerly shear is impacting this cluster, a surface low may be able to form if convection can persist. Regardless of whether a depression forms, this cluster will bring a period of showers and gusty winds first impacting Barbados, then the rest of the Windward Islands through Thursday.


is this todays weather or the time Natalee went missing?



Today's weather.  A typhoon is headed to China and this tropical storm is headed to the Antilles.  I was just thinking if Aruba has anymore books in their library, they need to cover them up and pull the plug before they get the power shock.  All the money for the roof of their library went to Paulus.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Anna on August 10, 2006, 03:29:25 AM
Quote from: "msmarple"
Anna (if you're still here) - You will be amused to learn that I am going to have to CALL the State Dept. tomorrow to get an actual name of somebody with whom to communicate. Re. the travel advisory.

Whoever answers the "Contact Us" emails does not know ...



I can believe that MsMarple!  Think I will go start a thread for murders in Aruba.  Let me know if you do get a name, please and address as I will share in the effort to the Dept of State certainly.  That is more important than the correction from the newspaper.

/


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: msmarple on August 10, 2006, 03:33:00 AM
igsigs - you're doing better than I. I am going to have to try printing these statements and figuring a way to read/compare.

Although I think it will turn out to be an exercise in inconsistency ....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: msmarple on August 10, 2006, 03:36:49 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "msmarple"
Anna (if you're still here) - You will be amused to learn that I am going to have to CALL the State Dept. tomorrow to get an actual name of somebody with whom to communicate. Re. the travel advisory.

Whoever answers the "Contact Us" emails does not know ...



I can believe that MsMarple!  Think I will go start a thread for murders in Aruba.  Let me know if you do get a name, please and address as I will share in the effort to the Dept of State certainly.  That is more important than the correction from the newspaper.


I am surprised that Monkeys weren't all over this. A travel advisory or warning (not sure what the correct term would be) would be the ultimate boycott.

I don't think we have to show that the crime rate is over-the-top -- what we need to show is that it is deliberately obscured.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: spooky112483 on August 10, 2006, 03:43:14 AM
NL flights have been canceled. that's on topic right? lol
going to bed now. got an eye doc appoinment in the morning.
good night


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: spooky112483 on August 10, 2006, 03:45:14 AM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "spooky112483"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
WHEN I CLICKED ONTO THE LINK IT DID NOT ANY LONGER GO WHERE I WANTED IT TO GO, BUT THIS IS ABOUT THE BOOK IN THE LIBRARY, ARUBA.


Air Force Reserve Reconnaissance Aircraft will investigate a cluster of thundershowers just east of the Lesser Antilles. While the cluster had pulsed down on Tuesday and the surface feature was simply a trough, convection regenerated early Wednesday morning. While light westerly shear is impacting this cluster, a surface low may be able to form if convection can persist. Regardless of whether a depression forms, this cluster will bring a period of showers and gusty winds first impacting Barbados, then the rest of the Windward Islands through Thursday.


is this todays weather or the time Natalee went missing?



Today's weather.  A typhoon is headed to China and this tropical storm is headed to the Antilles.  I was just thinking if Aruba has anymore books in their library, they need to cover them up and pull the plug before they get the power shock.  All the money for the roof of their library went to Paulus.


 :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: msmarple on August 10, 2006, 03:47:31 AM
Okay, I'm out. Night all.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Anna on August 10, 2006, 03:58:24 AM
Quote from: "msmarple"
[
I am surprised that Monkeys weren't all over this. A travel advisory or warning (not sure what the correct term would be) would be the ultimate boycott.

I don't think we have to show that the crime rate is over-the-top -- what we need to show is that it is deliberately obscured.



I think that a few have written to USAToday, MsMarple but I also think that you are correct in that it only requires the obstruction of factual and truthful information to bring about an advisory for if the information is not accurate, the crime rate could be literally anything.  

And that is what is happening in Aruba.  I do hope we can get a better list of murders and violent crime to submit to the State Dept and at least ask them to investigate.

We also need the information like that used by Grossman of no crime on One Happy Island.  Maybe we could just take it from the tourism sites on the internet for they always paint that picture as well.

Just a travel advisory and not ban would enhance the boycott tremendously.  And while it is not the same as justice for Natalee, at this point in time, it is all we have.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on August 10, 2006, 04:25:54 AM
Posted on 07/02/2005 6:06:21 PM PDT by CHARLITE

ORANJESTAD, Aruba -- Aruba's chief government spokesman said late yesterday that three young men detained in the disappearance of an Alabama teenager could be formally charged as soon as Monday.

Spokesman Reuben Trapenberg did not clarify what charges would be filed against the three.

Earlier, Aruba's attorney general, Karin Janssen, said the young men had been charged with murder since their arrest three weeks ago.

"The three have been charged with the murder of Natalee Holloway from the beginning" of their arrest 10 days after the young woman went missing May 30, she said in a recorded interview. "At the time, we didn't want to upset the family talking about murder while they searched."

The attorney general and other Aruba officials have said for weeks that no one has been charged in the 18-year-old's disappearance. Miss Janssen said authorities also withheld information about the charges in order not to compromise their investigation. Authorities have said they have no physical evidence suggesting Miss Holloway is dead.

Mr. Trapenberg called the Associated Press after the English-language interview with Miss Janssen. "This is a question of semantics, a problem since Day One," Mr. Trapenberg said. "The charging is a formal process that happens later on. It could happen as soon as Monday."

(Excerpt) Read more at insider.washingtontimes.com ...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on August 10, 2006, 04:27:16 AM
TIME LINE DILMA ARENDS/JORAN GOT HOME AT 4 A.M.

Aruba investigative reporter Dilma Arends elaborated on the Natalee Holloway investigation, implying that Aruba authorities may have a stronger case than many people realize. "Aruba authorities have been using cell sites and the cell phone batteries to determine the movement of the boys involved. For example, they were able to determine that Joren Van Der Sloot got home at 4 AM. So I think they have more proof than they are telling us." The Factor asserted that Arends' claims will provide comfort to Natalee's family. "What you just told us makes a difference to the Holloway family because it gives them some hope. There should be a way for the government to get more information to the family that is not going to damage the case."


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on August 10, 2006, 04:32:09 AM
FOR BLAH, WHO MADE THE CONFESSION

Explosive Report in Aruba
Tuesday, July 12, 2005
 
 
GRETA VAN SUSTEREN, HOST: Some explosive new details are emerging about the night Natalee Holloway (search) disappeared. The Aruban newspaper Diario broke the news on their front page on Monday. Joining us live from Aruba with the inside scoop is Diario's managing editor, Jossy Mansur.

Jossy, let me get straight to the main thing that struck everybody reading that article today, that Joran van der Sloot (search) claimed to the police to have buried Natalee. Is that right?

JOSSY MANSUR, DIARIO MANAGING EDITOR: That's correct, Greta. That happened on the second day of interrogations.

VAN SUSTEREN: Do you know when he supposedly made that statement to the police? Was it early on in his detention, or even before his detention or later?

MANSUR: No, it was when they had let them free. And when he came back, they (INAUDIBLE) him in as a suspect. On the second day of that detention, he broke down completely. He cried, and he admitted to the police, he confessed to the police that, we buried Natalee.

(Story continues below)

 


Title: Stay safe
Post by: IBE on August 10, 2006, 05:31:36 AM
Good Monkeys.... stay safe and keep up the good work.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Leslie on August 10, 2006, 08:19:46 AM
Diario
http://www.diarioaruba.com/
Amigoe
http://www.amigoe.com/english/
BonDia
http://www.cspnv.com/archivo/pdf/August/
Aruba Today
http://www.arubatoday.com/
Solo di Pueblo
http://www.solodipueblo.com/

Translator:
http://papiamentu.donamaro.nl/


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: BTgirl on August 10, 2006, 08:31:31 AM
I've already bought my airline tickets for traveling between here and London. :shock:

Skeery!! :shock:  :shock:  :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Mere on August 10, 2006, 08:37:24 AM
Good morning friends.... :)

Thank you Leslie.

BT....was thinking of you and DH.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: tcumom on August 10, 2006, 08:40:40 AM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
I've already bought my airline tickets for traveling between here and London. :shock:

Skeery!! :shock:  :shock:  :shock:

I immediately thought of you after reading that!  Yikes!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on August 10, 2006, 08:45:49 AM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
I've already bought my airline tickets for traveling between here and London. :shock:

Skeery!! :shock:  :shock:  :shock:


Yes BT, very scary.
A girl here at work is also booked to go to London in a couple of weeks...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: San on August 10, 2006, 08:47:30 AM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
I've already bought my airline tickets for traveling between here and London. :shock:

Skeery!! :shock:  :shock:  :shock:

BT I forgot you were traveling.  I'm sure everything will be OK.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: San on August 10, 2006, 08:59:51 AM
FROM DEEPAK'S JUNE 16TH STATEMENT:

I asked him if he had had sex with the girl. He said that they went into the water briefly and that after that they sat down on the beach and the girl had fallen asleep, that is what I understood. His actual words were that the girl "passed out" on the beach and that he left her there. I asked him why he had left her there. He answered that she would be leaving the same day and that someone would find her there. I cursed him/told him off for the fact that he had left her there. I even told him he was sick for doing that to the girl. I have to tell you there was a lot of disturbance on the phone. It happened several times that I could not hear Joran. At some point it was so bad that he said that when he would get home, he would come online.

Sick for leaving Natalee on the beach or sick for doing something else.  He was never at any beach.

Why not just call him.  If you can talk to him at the beach on the phone why not call him on the phone.  Why only talk on line.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: San on August 10, 2006, 09:03:58 AM
FROM DEEPAK'S JUNE 16TH STATEMENT:

To your question about the day that myself, Satish and Joran went for a walk at the "Raquet Club" and who had observed this, I can say the following. Koen and Guido certainly saw us. Sander may have seen us, I am unsure about that.

Deepak is very good in giving details about how many times he relieves himself but he can't recall if Koen's younger brother saw him.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: San on August 10, 2006, 09:09:00 AM
FROM DEEPAK'S JUNE 16TH STATEMENT:

To your question as to how long I have known Andre, I can say the following. I estimate that I have known him for about 5 months. I got to know him through Koen. That happened when Koen came to where I work and Andre was with him.

To your question as to whether I know where Andre lives, I can say the following. I do not know where Andre lives. Koen and Sander know where Andre lives. They are good friends.


I think I missed something.  Do we know who Andre is?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: thecuz on August 10, 2006, 09:12:28 AM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
I've already bought my airline tickets for traveling between here and London. :shock:

Skeery!! :shock:  :shock:  :shock:


no water,no coffee,no shampoo, no cough syrup......bt...one good thing....the british really are on top of the terrorists....
so thankful my daughter is back safe and sound!!!!!
morning san!
morning any early monkeys!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Anna on August 10, 2006, 09:13:12 AM
Quote from: "San"
FROM DEEPAK'S JUNE 16TH STATEMENT:

To your question as to how long I have known Andre, I can say the following. I estimate that I have known him for about 5 months. I got to know him through Koen. That happened when Koen came to where I work and Andre was with him.

To your question as to whether I know where Andre lives, I can say the following. I do not know where Andre lives. Koen and Sander know where Andre lives. They are good friends.


I think I missed something.  Do we know who Andre is?



I believe that would be Andres dos Santos.  He has a tickle site and also is listed as one of Joe Tacapino's "character Witnesses" {read liars} for Joran that he would need to testify if a trial were held in NY.  He is on the list.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Peaches on August 10, 2006, 09:14:56 AM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Shizaru"
Isn't there a statement by Joran missing here?  There should be one before the June 13 statement, where he claims 2K dropped him off at his home and drove off with Natalee


There is a statement prior to that, but there is no OFFICIAL statement regards the claim that K2 dropped waterhead off at his house and left with Natalee.



waterhead

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
oh dam, thats funny
waterhead


That's funny right there.  I don't care who ya are.  

Somebody's been watching too much Larry The Cable Guy....

Good morning.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: San on August 10, 2006, 09:15:18 AM
FROM DEEPAK'S JUNE 16TH STATEMENT:

To your question whether I can state anything about the case of the missing girl, I can say the following. Joran had made up the story that there were traces of blood in my car. My car was ripped open by the police and one could see that was this was a lie. Now he is telling a story about how the police should look into it that I always have money. I have a job and get an allowance from my parents. I am not Joran who steals money from his parents. And I am of the opinion that, that this is not the issue at this moment. If you want to find out what happened to the girl and where she is, you have to be with Joran van der SLOOT Joran van der SLOOT is a disturbed/sich person, he has admitted that he is in the care of a psychologist and that he hits his brother. If the police wants more information about Natalee, then you have to be with Joran. He was the last person with the girl, that I can guarantee.

Deepak has a job and gets an allowance from his parents?  He is 21 years old and he gets an allowance.

Now Joran is the one who made up the story about blood in his car.

Even Deepak knows that Joran is seeing a psychologist and calling him a disturbed person.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: San on August 10, 2006, 09:16:19 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "San"
FROM DEEPAK'S JUNE 16TH STATEMENT:

To your question as to how long I have known Andre, I can say the following. I estimate that I have known him for about 5 months. I got to know him through Koen. That happened when Koen came to where I work and Andre was with him.

To your question as to whether I know where Andre lives, I can say the following. I do not know where Andre lives. Koen and Sander know where Andre lives. They are good friends.


I think I missed something.  Do we know who Andre is?


I believe that would be Andres dos Santos.  He has a tickle site and also is listed as one of Joe Tacapino's "character Witnesses" {read liars} for Joran that he would need to testify if a trial were held in NY.  He is on the list.

Thanks Anna.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: BTgirl on August 10, 2006, 09:23:58 AM
Quote from: "thecuz"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
I've already bought my airline tickets for traveling between here and London. :shock:

Skeery!! :shock:  :shock:  :shock:


no water,no coffee,no shampoo, no cough syrup......bt...one good thing....the british really are on top of the terrorists....
so thankful my daughter is back safe and sound!!!!!
morning san!
morning any early monkeys!


I'm soooo glad your daughter is back safely as well!

The scarierest thing to me is making that long flight with no lotion or toothpaste. :shock:

And ya know, they don't usually bring you that bottled water back in the cheap seats. :(


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: San on August 10, 2006, 09:24:28 AM
From the beginning I was convinced that Joran did not attend school the next day.  I am still sticking to that.  We found out that Satish didn't attend school and neither did Joran.  They had too many loose ends to tie up.  No way did he go to school.  Paulus needed them to get their stories straight and he knew he didn't have enough time.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: San on August 10, 2006, 09:25:28 AM
Quote from: "thecuz"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
I've already bought my airline tickets for traveling between here and London. :shock:

Skeery!! :shock:  :shock:  :shock:


no water,no coffee,no shampoo, no cough syrup......bt...one good thing....the british really are on top of the terrorists....
so thankful my daughter is back safe and sound!!!!!
morning san!
morning any early monkeys!

Good morning Cuz and everyone else I missed.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: San on August 10, 2006, 09:30:05 AM
I think I'm talking to myself :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on August 10, 2006, 09:31:43 AM
Quote from: "San"
I think I'm talking to myself :lol:


Good morning SAN! :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: San on August 10, 2006, 09:35:28 AM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "San"
I think I'm talking to myself :lol:


Good morning SAN! :lol:

Morning Jacq. :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Mere on August 10, 2006, 09:38:28 AM
Quote from: "San"
I think I'm talking to myself :lol:


Good morning San...old people are slower... :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Shizaru on August 10, 2006, 09:44:36 AM
Joran 6/15 statement says the Bubali interview was on Tues May 31.  

So when Deepak said he vaccumed the car the day before the Bubali interview, because Joran had almost fallen in the water and then sat down in the car with sand on him, he was referring to an incident on Monday, the day Natalee went missing.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Kimmy53 on August 10, 2006, 09:44:48 AM
Quote from: "San"
FROM DEEPAK'S JUNE 16TH STATEMENT:

I asked him if he had had sex with the girl. He said that they went into the water briefly and that after that they sat down on the beach and the girl had fallen asleep, that is what I understood. His actual words were that the girl "passed out" on the beach and that he left her there. I asked him why he had left her there. He answered that she would be leaving the same day and that someone would find her there. I cursed him/told him off for the fact that he had left her there. I even told him he was sick for doing that to the girl. I have to tell you there was a lot of disturbance on the phone. It happened several times that I could not hear Joran. At some point it was so bad that he said that when he would get home, he would come online.

Sick for leaving Natalee on the beach or sick for doing something else.  He was never at any beach.

Why not just call him.  If you can talk to him at the beach on the phone why not call him on the phone.  Why only talk on line.


This stood out to me... What a strange comment - he was "sick" for diong that to the girl.

This makes me believe that just leaving someone on the beach is not sick...It is what happened that is "sick" Makes me think Deepak knows something "sick" happened.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Shizaru on August 10, 2006, 09:45:55 AM
Quote from: "Shizaru"
Joran 6/15 statement says the Bubali interview was on Tues May 31.  

So when Deepak said he vaccumed the car the day before the Bubali interview, because Joran had almost fallen in the water and then sat down in the car with sand on him, he was referring to an incident on Monday, the day Natalee went missing.


Edit: 6/14 statement.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: San on August 10, 2006, 09:50:56 AM
Quote from: "Kimmy53"
Quote from: "San"
FROM DEEPAK'S JUNE 16TH STATEMENT:

I asked him if he had had sex with the girl. He said that they went into the water briefly and that after that they sat down on the beach and the girl had fallen asleep, that is what I understood. His actual words were that the girl "passed out" on the beach and that he left her there. I asked him why he had left her there. He answered that she would be leaving the same day and that someone would find her there. I cursed him/told him off for the fact that he had left her there. I even told him he was sick for doing that to the girl. I have to tell you there was a lot of disturbance on the phone. It happened several times that I could not hear Joran. At some point it was so bad that he said that when he would get home, he would come online.

Sick for leaving Natalee on the beach or sick for doing something else.  He was never at any beach.

Why not just call him.  If you can talk to him at the beach on the phone why not call him on the phone.  Why only talk on line.


This stood out to me... What a strange comment - he was "sick" for diong that to the girl.

This makes me believe that just leaving someone on the beach is not sick...It is what happened that is "sick" Makes me think Deepak knows something "sick" happened.

Exactly Kimmy.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: sharon on August 10, 2006, 09:51:03 AM
Quote from: "San"
FROM DEEPAK'S JUNE 16TH STATEMENT:

To your question whether I can state anything about the case of the missing girl, I can say the following. Joran had made up the story that there were traces of blood in my car. My car was ripped open by the police and one could see that was this was a lie. Now he is telling a story about how the police should look into it that I always have money. I have a job and get an allowance from my parents. I am not Joran who steals money from his parents. And I am of the opinion that, that this is not the issue at this moment. If you want to find out what happened to the girl and where she is, you have to be with Joran van der SLOOT Joran van der SLOOT is a disturbed/sich person, he has admitted that he is in the care of a psychologist and that he hits his brother. If the police wants more information about Natalee, then you have to be with Joran. He was the last person with the girl, that I can guarantee.

Deepak has a job and gets an allowance from his parents?  He is 21 years old and he gets an allowance.

Now Joran is the one who made up the story about blood in his car.

Even Deepak knows that Joran is seeing a psychologist and calling him a disturbed person.


San --

I think that's my favorite part out of all the statements.

Deepak is turning on Joran. I wonder why?

Joran is the one without the job -- the A+ sporter high school student. I would think that the police should be much more curious as to where HIS money comes from. Stealing from his parents? Cheating tourists in the casino??

Again, my mind goes to Beth's statements -- "they are no even denying that something bad happened..they are pointing their fingers at eachother" (paraphrased).

.......
If the police wants more information about Natalee, then you have to be with Joran. He was the last person with the girl, that I can guarantee.

hmmmmmm. guarantee.


.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Kimmy53 on August 10, 2006, 09:51:35 AM
From Deepak's June 16th Statement:

 If you want to find out what happened to the girl and where she is, you have to be with Joran van der SLOOT

Isn't the wording of this curious if they contend they left her on the beach?

Joran van der SLOOT is a disturbed/sich person, he has admitted that he is in the care of a psychologist and that he hits his brother. If the police wants more information about Natalee, then you have to be with Joran.

What would motivate Deepak to make this comment about Joran being disturbed.  Again I believe this shows knowledge of something happening to Natalee.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: sharon on August 10, 2006, 09:57:25 AM
Quote from: "San"
From the beginning I was convinced that Joran did not attend school the next day.  I am still sticking to that.  We found out that Satish didn't attend school and neither did Joran.  They had too many loose ends to tie up.  No way did he go to school.  Paulus needed them to get their stories straight and he knew he didn't have enough time.


There are also several comments by Joran that Deepak did not have to work the next day. That's why Deepak offered to go back and find Joran's sneakers (per jvds) after DK picked him up. (and we know that was only to try to place DK with Natalee after jvds).

But we know from DK statements that he DID have to go to work the next day.

Maybe it's a translation thing -- since Deepak doesn't leave for work until the afternoon?

I've brought up this discrepancy before but was told that Joran never said that Deepak was off the next day. Well.....now I've read it in his statement.



.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: sharon on August 10, 2006, 09:58:28 AM
Quote from: "Shizaru"
Joran 6/15 statement says the Bubali interview was on Tues May 31.  

So when Deepak said he vaccumed the car the day before the Bubali interview, because Joran had almost fallen in the water and then sat down in the car with sand on him, he was referring to an incident on Monday, the day Natalee went missing.


That's how I read it Shizaru.

Interesting, eh? :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: San on August 10, 2006, 10:02:34 AM
Quote from: "sharon"

San --

I think that's my favorite part out of all the statements.

Deepak is turning on Joran. I wonder why?

Joran is the one without the job -- the A+ sporter high school student. I would think that the police should be much more curious as to where HIS money comes from. Stealing from his parents? Cheating tourists in the casino??

Again, my mind goes to Beth's statements -- "they are no even denying that something bad happened..they are pointing their fingers at eachother" (paraphrased).

.......
If the police wants more information about Natalee, then you have to be with Joran. He was the last person with the girl, that I can guarantee.

hmmmmmm. guarantee.
.

He can guarantee it because he dropped Joran off at his house with Natalee.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: ldstlou on August 10, 2006, 10:03:55 AM
Quote from: "Shizaru"
Joran 6/15 statement says the Bubali interview was on Tues May 31.  

So when Deepak said he vaccumed the car the day before the Bubali interview, because Joran had almost fallen in the water and then sat down in the car with sand on him, he was referring to an incident on Monday, the day Natalee went missing.


Morning Monkeys!!
I woke up at 5am this morning...finally getting back to normal schedule and read through the transcripts. Have not had time to sit and make notes but was this in fact true...was he referring to day after Natalee went missing? And where did the sand come from??!! No one mentioned a trip t the beach did they??!! Just meeting at Casino!!  He got a bit testy about cleaning the car too didn't he?? Mentioned he can clean his car when ever he wanted to.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: San on August 10, 2006, 10:06:52 AM
Quote from: "Kimmy53"
From Deepak's June 16th Statement:

 If you want to find out what happened to the girl and where she is, you have to be with Joran van der SLOOT

Isn't the wording of this curious if they contend they left her on the beach?

Joran van der SLOOT is a disturbed/sich person, he has admitted that he is in the care of a psychologist and that he hits his brother. If the police wants more information about Natalee, then you have to be with Joran.

What would motivate Deepak to make this comment about Joran being disturbed.  Again I believe this shows knowledge of something happening to Natalee.

Also notice how Deepak throws in the statement about hitting his brother.  Is he saying Joran hit Natalee.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: ldstlou on August 10, 2006, 10:13:06 AM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Kimmy53"
From Deepak's June 16th Statement:

 If you want to find out what happened to the girl and where she is, you have to be with Joran van der SLOOT

Isn't the wording of this curious if they contend they left her on the beach?

Joran van der SLOOT is a disturbed/sich person, he has admitted that he is in the care of a psychologist and that he hits his brother. If the police wants more information about Natalee, then you have to be with Joran.

What would motivate Deepak to make this comment about Joran being disturbed.  Again I believe this shows knowledge of something happening to Natalee.

Also notice how Deepak throws in the statement about hitting his brother.  Is he saying Joran hit Natalee.


great point San...did not pick up on that...he just may be trying to show his violent tendencies..also why he mention psychiatrist. Did you also notice he is seeing psychiatrist instead of counselor or psycholgist?! This would suggest he is receiving meds too!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: ldstlou on August 10, 2006, 10:15:18 AM
if in fact he was receiving meds...which if he was seeing a psychiatrist rather than anger management counselor or psychologist...mixing them with alcohol??!! LIVE WIRE!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: San on August 10, 2006, 10:17:08 AM
Quote from: "ldstlou"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Kimmy53"
From Deepak's June 16th Statement:

 If you want to find out what happened to the girl and where she is, you have to be with Joran van der SLOOT

Isn't the wording of this curious if they contend they left her on the beach?

Joran van der SLOOT is a disturbed/sich person, he has admitted that he is in the care of a psychologist and that he hits his brother. If the police wants more information about Natalee, then you have to be with Joran.

What would motivate Deepak to make this comment about Joran being disturbed.  Again I believe this shows knowledge of something happening to Natalee.

Also notice how Deepak throws in the statement about hitting his brother.  Is he saying Joran hit Natalee.


great point San...did not pick up on that...he just may be trying to show his violent tendencies..also why he mention psychiatrist. Did you also notice he is seeing psychiatrist instead of counselor or psycholgist?! This would suggest he is receiving meds too!!

If he was receiving meds he was not taking them.  With his attitude he feels he doesn't needs meds because there is nothing wrong with him.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Kimmy53 on August 10, 2006, 10:17:14 AM
From Satish's June 11th Statement:

. Joran told my brother that he had then tried to wake up the girl but that she had not awakened.

Could there be truth in this statement?  

 Joran told my brother that he had looked to find his shoes but that he couldn't find them. Joran told my brother that he had left the girl on the beach and that he had walked home barefoot.

Joran was in a hurry to get away from wherever he was...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: San on August 10, 2006, 10:18:32 AM
Quote from: "ldstlou"
if in fact he was receiving meds...which if he was seeing a psychiatrist rather than anger management counselor or psychologist...mixing them with alcohol??!! LIVE WIRE!!

Exactly.  And lord knows what other drugs he was taking.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: ldstlou on August 10, 2006, 10:22:11 AM
Quote from: "Kimmy53"
From Satish's June 11th Statement:

. Joran told my brother that he had then tried to wake up the girl but that she had not awakened.

Could there be truth in this statement?  

 Joran told my brother that he had looked to find his shoes but that he couldn't find them. Joran told my brother that he had left the girl on the beach and that he had walked home barefoot.

Joran was in a hurry to get away from wherever he was...


definately see panic here...but also see panic from Deepak when he speaks in an earlier statement about driving back fast from lighthouse after she falls asleep in car. Definate need to analyse.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Kimmy53 on August 10, 2006, 10:22:18 AM
Deepak had called me with his mobile phone 568xxxx.

Oh - had Deepak gotten some more minutes by then?  Thought he was out of minutes.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: ldstlou on August 10, 2006, 10:23:15 AM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "ldstlou"
if in fact he was receiving meds...which if he was seeing a psychiatrist rather than anger management counselor or psychologist...mixing them with alcohol??!! LIVE WIRE!!

Exactly.  And lord knows what other drugs he was taking.


doing google search to see what meds would be prescribed typically for anger management...anyone know off hand?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: ldstlou on August 10, 2006, 10:24:28 AM
Quote from: "Kimmy53"
Deepak had called me with his mobile phone 568xxxx.

Oh - had Deepak gotten some more minutes by then?  Thought he was out of minutes.


no crap!! a lot of myths debunked here frm their own statements!! Deepak LOW on minutes but definately not OUT!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: the big hammer on August 10, 2006, 10:29:06 AM
Blood In Kalpoe Car


FROM DEEPAK'S JUNE 16TH STATEMENT: To your question whether I can state anything about the case of the missing girl, I can say the following. Joran had made up the story that there were traces of blood in my car. My car was ripped open by the police and one could see that was this was a lie.

This is the third mention of blood in car:

1.  FBI to BHT early on.
2.  Obduber to Beth during meeting
3.  Here in deepak's June 16 statement, attributed to jvds.

Deepak arrested/detained June 9.  Description of items impounded does not include car on that day.  There was a timeline posted indicating kalpoe car was impounded and seized by polis on June 13.

Point being of course that visit to Automotive Enterprises to "fix flat" could hvae easily preceded June 9 arrest.  And date of this statement -- June 16 -- follows car siezing on the 13th.  If sieze date is June 13, just because polis throughly searched car, does not make this statement true.

Can we confirm date of kalpoe car seizure by ALE?  TIA.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: San on August 10, 2006, 10:30:45 AM
Quote from: "Kimmy53"
Deepak had called me with his mobile phone 568xxxx.

Oh - had Deepak gotten some more minutes by then?  Thought he was out of minutes.

What this all boils down to are phone records.  The ALE isn't going to release any phone calls that were made by the suspects those first few days.  They are only releasing a certain few because the suspects themselves admitted to making certain calls when they made up their false alibi.

Wouldn't you love to see Paulus' phone records.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: ldstlou on August 10, 2006, 10:32:07 AM
Quote
Effexor's pros and cons:

Pros: If anything is going to cure the deepest, blackest depression, it's Effexor (venlafaxine hydrochloride). Perhaps Effexor (venlafaxine hydrochloride) in combination with an antipsychotic, but for deep, despairing clinical depression that is going to respond to the standard tweaking of the popular neurotransmitters, Effexor (venlafaxine hydrochloride) pulls people out of the abyss.

Cons: The absolute worst discontinuation syndrome of an antidepressant. Effexor (venlafaxine hydrochloride) is a medication people utterly loathe to have taken. It is not uncommon for someone to change doctors during or immediately after Effexor (venlafaxine hydrochloride) discontinuation.

Effexor's Typical Side Effects: The usual for SSRIs and SNRIs -  headache, nausea, dry mouth, sweating, sleepiness or insomnia, and diarrhea or constipation, weight gain, loss of libido and a host of other sexual dysfunctions. Most everything but the weight gain and sexual dysfunctions usually goes away within a couple of weeks.  Although some women will notice that the sexual side effects will diminish above 200-225mg a day when the norepinephrine kicks in.  Maybe.

For tips on how to cope with these side effects, please see our side effects page.

Effexor's Not So Common Side Effects: Increased or lowered blood pressure, sweating, farting, anorexia, twitching, shock-like sensations.

 These may or may not happen to you don't, so don't be surprised one way or the other.

Effexor's Freaky Rare Side Effects: Alcohol intolerance and alcohol abuse. So Effexor (venlafaxine hydrochloride) is going to be just the thing to talk about at AA meetings. Someone's reflexes increased and someone else's breasts got bigger, proving that there is no pleasing some people. Someone else's hair changed color and, really, no Revlon was involved. But the most disturbing freaky rare side effect with Effexor (venlafaxine hydrochloride) is what Wyeth disingenuously calls "withdrawal syndrome," that once you acclimate to Effexor (venlafaxine hydrochloride) you are basically hooked for life. The discontinuation syndrome never goes away if you try to stop. For someone with unipolar depression that's a pain in the ass, but something you might be able to work around barring any really adverse side effects, but for someone who is bipolar you can be royally screwed because Effexor (venlafaxine hydrochloride) can really aggravate mania and especially rapid cycling.

I've been getting a few e-mails and reading a few reports about how Effexor has caused Effexor users, as well as friends and relatives using the med to really hit the booze, so alcohol abuse may not be that rare a side effect after all.   Best guess to date on that - Paul of Leeds (in the U.K.) posits that Effexor's broad spectrum use of liver enzymes probably interferes with alcohol clearance and tolerance, thus leading to the type of alcoholism that affects people without the proper enzymes to effectively metabolize alcohol.  Between that and the way Effexor works your liver, you're probably better off giving up booze entirely if you're taking this med


Kind of interesting!! This seems to be a common med for people who have anger management problems...would explain the alcohol abuse!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on August 10, 2006, 10:38:28 AM
Quote from: "the big hammer"
Blood In Kalpoe Car


FROM DEEPAK'S JUNE 16TH STATEMENT: To your question whether I can state anything about the case of the missing girl, I can say the following. Joran had made up the story that there were traces of blood in my car. My car was ripped open by the police and one could see that was this was a lie.

This is the third mention of blood in car:

1.  FBI to BHT early on.
2.  Obduber to Beth during meeting
3.  Here in deepak's June 16 statement, attributed to jvds.

Deepak arrested/detained June 9.  Description of items impounded does not include car on that day.  There was a timeline posted indicating kalpoe car was impounded and seized by polis on June 13.

Point being of course that visit to Automotive Enterprises to "fix flat" could hvae easily preceded June 9 arrest.  And date of this statement -- June 16 -- follows car siezing on the 13th.  If sieze date is June 13, just because polis throughly searched car, does not make this statement true.

Can we confirm date of kalpoe car seizure by ALE?  TIA.


HAMMER - According to this article, the Kalpoe car was seized on June 9th:

Nancy Grace - June 16th, 2005

GRACE: Well, there has been many days since Natalee went missing.

Very quickly, back to Karl Penhaul, CNN correspondent there in Aruba. Karl, what can you tell us about this evidence that was seized? We know many bags of evidence were taken from these three suspects` home.

And let`s get it straight, Karl. At the beginning, two minority security guards were arrested, all right, taken into custody in connection with Natalee`s disappearance. The three young men that took her from the bar, Carlos and Charlie`s, that night, were not arrested. They were questioned and released. Now they`re behind bars, and the two security guards have been released. Now, what was in the evidence taken from these three young men`s home?

PENHAUL: The only evidence that we can confirm we know has been taken was that, in the first raid on the three suspects` homes, which was a week ago last Thursday, we saw taken out of the Kalpoe brothers` houses a computer hard drive. And we also saw a silver gray Honda being impounded at that house.


(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/June2005.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Kimmy53 on August 10, 2006, 10:40:46 AM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Kimmy53"
Deepak had called me with his mobile phone 568xxxx.

Oh - had Deepak gotten some more minutes by then?  Thought he was out of minutes.

What this all boils down to are phone records.  The ALE isn't going to release any phone calls that were made by the suspects those first few days.  They are only releasing a certain few because the suspects themselves admitted to making certain calls when they made up their false alibi.

Wouldn't you love to see Paulus' phone records.


Oh - we'll never see those records for sure.  And you are right - I'd love to know what we could find out from Pvds records.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Kimmy53 on August 10, 2006, 10:45:42 AM
Quote from: "the big hammer"
Blood In Kalpoe Car


FROM DEEPAK'S JUNE 16TH STATEMENT: To your question whether I can state anything about the case of the missing girl, I can say the following. Joran had made up the story that there were traces of blood in my car. My car was ripped open by the police and one could see that was this was a lie.

This is the third mention of blood in car:

1.  FBI to BHT early on.
2.  Obduber to Beth during meeting
3.  Here in deepak's June 16 statement, attributed to jvds.

Deepak arrested/detained June 9.  Description of items impounded does not include car on that day.  There was a timeline posted indicating kalpoe car was impounded and seized by polis on June 13.

Point being of course that visit to Automotive Enterprises to "fix flat" could hvae easily preceded June 9 arrest.  And date of this statement -- June 16 -- follows car siezing on the 13th.  If sieze date is June 13, just because polis throughly searched car, does not make this statement true.

Can we confirm date of kalpoe car seizure by ALE?  TIA.


Along a similar line:  Where would Joran get info to tell that there was traces of blood in the car?  

Could be an attempted set up - Could be that Joran knew there were traces in the car without being told.  Could be that someone was feeding Joran information as to mold his stories around it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Peaches on August 10, 2006, 10:47:11 AM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Kimmy53"
Deepak had called me with his mobile phone 568xxxx.

Oh - had Deepak gotten some more minutes by then?  Thought he was out of minutes.

What this all boils down to are phone records.  The ALE isn't going to release any phone calls that were made by the suspects those first few days.  They are only releasing a certain few because the suspects themselves admitted to making certain calls when they made up their false alibi.

Wouldn't you love to see Paulus' phone records.


Not really.  I would rather see him tied to a chair and smacked silly until the truth leaks out.  I don't care who goes first.  Or last.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: ldstlou on August 10, 2006, 10:50:30 AM
for Anna...
Quote

Adolescents (10-14 and 15-19 years): Between 1996 and 1999, 15 deaths of adolescents were reported: two in 1996-1997, six in 1998 and seven in 1999. Nine of these deaths were due to external causes: six were due to motor vehicle accidents, two due to suicide and self-inflicted injury, and one due to accidental poisoning. According to a 1998 survey, 20% of children 6-14 years old who attended school do not eat breakfast before going to study; however, more than three-quarters (76%) consumed a warm meal every day or almost every day. The survey also found that children attending primary school had a higher frequency of eating fruits (46%) than vegetables (39%). Consumption of soft drink seems to be the preferred habit for 45% of the children, at a frequency of at least one bottle per day. Approximately 70% of the children bring food and a beverage to school. In 1997, a study on drug use among males aged 17 to 25 years old found that the average age for marijuana use was just under 21 years old and the average age for cocaine and crack use was slightly older than 23 years. Of great concern is the finding that roughly one-third of the people (30%) in this age group use drugs.


per Pan Amercan Health Organization. "there's that suicide/self inflicted injuries" again!! Seemd no one is murdered on island...they all commit suicide!! Why on One Happy Island?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: San on August 10, 2006, 10:50:59 AM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Kimmy53"
Deepak had called me with his mobile phone 568xxxx.

Oh - had Deepak gotten some more minutes by then?  Thought he was out of minutes.

What this all boils down to are phone records.  The ALE isn't going to release any phone calls that were made by the suspects those first few days.  They are only releasing a certain few because the suspects themselves admitted to making certain calls when they made up their false alibi.

Wouldn't you love to see Paulus' phone records.


Not really.  I would rather see him tied to a chair and smacked silly until the truth leaks out.  I don't care who goes first.  Or last.

I going to be good and not comment on this one because I could think of worse :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: San on August 10, 2006, 11:14:05 AM
FROM DEEPAK'S JUNE 16TH STATEMENT:

I asked him if he had had sex with the girl. He said that they went into the water briefly and that after that they sat down on the beach and the girl had fallen asleep, that is what I understood. His actual words were that the girl "passed out" on the beach and that he left her there.

Deepak debunks Joran's whole story that he told Greta.  What happened to the conversation that he had with Natalee and how she didn't want to go home.  Joran never talked that they went into the water.  What happened to he picked her up and was going to carry her to her hotel but she said put her down.  What BS.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Kimmy53 on August 10, 2006, 11:16:43 AM
Deepak:

During the conversation I had with him I had for one reason or another shot my mouth off and said something about the sporting shoes. The man asked me what I meant by sporting shoes. I then said to him that I was thinking about something unrelated/different.

This is extremely curious to me... Deepak was conversing with the man in the green Yaris - for some reason, he "shot off his mouth"  this tells me something struck a nerve and made Deepak mad.  WHY would he mention the shoes?  Then realize what he said and pretty much change the subject?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: San on August 10, 2006, 11:26:30 AM
Quote from: "Kimmy53"
Deepak:

During the conversation I had with him I had for one reason or another shot my mouth off and said something about the sporting shoes. The man asked me what I meant by sporting shoes. I then said to him that I was thinking about something unrelated/different.

This is extremely curious to me... Deepak was conversing with the man in the green Yaris - for some reason, he "shot off his mouth"  this tells me something struck a nerve and made Deepak mad.  WHY would he mention the shoes?  Then realize what he said and pretty much change the subject?

Deepak is always giving a little too much information and there are reason behind it.  Deepak know exactly what happened and so does Satish.  By this time Deepaks mind is racing and he sees the HI isn't going to work.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Ono on August 10, 2006, 11:47:20 AM
Quote from: "the big hammer"
Blood In Kalpoe Car


FROM DEEPAK'S JUNE 16TH STATEMENT: To your question whether I can state anything about the case of the missing girl, I can say the following. Joran had made up the story that there were traces of blood in my car. My car was ripped open by the police and one could see that was this was a lie.

This is the third mention of blood in car:

1.  FBI to BHT early on.
2.  Obduber to Beth during meeting
3.  Here in deepak's June 16 statement, attributed to jvds.

Deepak arrested/detained June 9.  Description of items impounded does not include car on that day.  There was a timeline posted indicating kalpoe car was impounded and seized by polis on June 13.

Point being of course that visit to Automotive Enterprises to "fix flat" could hvae easily preceded June 9 arrest.  And date of this statement -- June 16 -- follows car siezing on the 13th.  If sieze date is June 13, just because polis throughly searched car, does not make this statement true.

Can we confirm date of kalpoe car seizure by ALE?  TIA.


Side note:  

Remember how sarcastic Satish was in the conversation between the three in the police car regarding the flat tire ?? There was NO flat tire...IMO.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Ono on August 10, 2006, 11:58:59 AM
Quote from: "San"
FROM DEEPAK'S JUNE 16TH STATEMENT:

I asked him if he had had sex with the girl. He said that they went into the water briefly and that after that they sat down on the beach and the girl had fallen asleep, that is what I understood. His actual words were that the girl "passed out" on the beach and that he left her there.

Deepak debunks Joran's whole story that he told Greta.  What happened to the conversation that he had with Natalee and how she didn't want to go home.  Joran never talked that they went into the water.  What happened to he picked her up and was going to carry her to her hotel but she said put her down.  What BS.


It's amazing to me that Greta fell for Joran's "codswallop"...she really was taken.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: nonesuche on August 10, 2006, 12:04:13 PM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Kimmy53"
Deepak had called me with his mobile phone 568xxxx.

Oh - had Deepak gotten some more minutes by then?  Thought he was out of minutes.

What this all boils down to are phone records.  The ALE isn't going to release any phone calls that were made by the suspects those first few days.  They are only releasing a certain few because the suspects themselves admitted to making certain calls when they made up their false alibi.

Wouldn't you love to see Paulus' phone records.


Not really.  I would rather see him tied to a chair and smacked silly until the truth leaks out.  I don't care who goes first.  Or last.


forgive the quote stacks

 :lol:  :lol:  :lol: I have this visual of Peaches on one side and San on the other saying "snap out of it, tell us the truth!!"

 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: AnnieMW1 on August 10, 2006, 12:16:46 PM
Hi Monkeys -

I haven't been posting here at all lately, but just wanted to say what a fabulous job you all continue to do.

One thing I'm noticing about the statement details is Joran's comment that he didn't speak to anyone at all at school the next day about being with or leaving Natalee anywhere.

Where did we hear that he was indeed talking to everyone about it - someone from the school called Anita or Paulus who then called Joran to tell him to shut his trap?

Astounding statement details here from the Pimpsters....they're all lying...and I continue to hope and pray that they all go down, particularly as they continue to flaunt their freedom in front of everyone.

Back to lurking periodically....carry on Monkeys.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: sharon on August 10, 2006, 12:17:59 PM
http://blogsfornatalee.com/forums/index.php?topic=4461.msg144075#msg144075

I do not know how to post the pictures over here.

Kermit at BFN posted the MOST INTERESTING photos relating to the 'sneakers'.

And a NEW train of thought for us all.

He has a picture of Paulus -- with his KSwiss sneakers on :shock:

It's about midway down the page that I linked above.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: San on August 10, 2006, 12:22:32 PM
Quote from: "AnnieMW1"
Hi Monkeys -

I haven't been posting here at all lately, but just wanted to say what a fabulous job you all continue to do.

One thing I'm noticing about the statement details is Joran's comment that he didn't speak to anyone at all at school the next day about being with or leaving Natalee anywhere.

Where did we hear that he was indeed talking to everyone about it - someone from the school called Anita or Paulus who then called Joran to tell him to shut his trap?

Astounding statement details here from the Pimpsters....they're all lying...and I continue to hope and pray that they all go down, particularly as they continue to flaunt their freedom in front of everyone.

Back to lurking periodically....carry on Monkeys.

Hi Annie I hope you're doing well.  I miss you posting.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on August 10, 2006, 12:24:49 PM
Quote from: "AnnieMW1"
Hi Monkeys -

I haven't been posting here at all lately, but just wanted to say what a fabulous job you all continue to do.

One thing I'm noticing about the statement details is Joran's comment that he didn't speak to anyone at all at school the next day about being with or leaving Natalee anywhere.

Where did we hear that he was indeed talking to everyone about it - someone from the school called Anita or Paulus who then called Joran to tell him to shut his trap?

Astounding statement details here from the Pimpsters....they're all lying...and I continue to hope and pray that they all go down, particularly as they continue to flaunt their freedom in front of everyone.

Back to lurking periodically....carry on Monkeys.


Hey Annie!

Glad you popped in to say hello!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on August 10, 2006, 12:25:02 PM
Andre SANTOS:

http://www.stevegtennis.com/results/2003/q-f-aruba1.txt

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/AndreSantos.jpg)

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/AndreSantos2.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Anna on August 10, 2006, 12:27:22 PM
.
Also, remember that kilometers are equal to approx 1.6 mph so that going 90 kilometers per hour is still only about 52 miles per hours.  Not that fast by open road standards but pretty fast in traffic.

Sounds faster than it actually is because we think in mph.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: San on August 10, 2006, 12:30:00 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Andre SANTOS:

http://www.stevegtennis.com/results/2003/q-f-aruba1.txt

Thanks Klaas.  In that one picture the four that you named are all involved.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: the big hammer on August 10, 2006, 12:33:50 PM
Total Cars Seized: 3.  On Different Days.

Kalpoe Honda seized on June 9 (per klaas above):

According to this article, the Kalpoe car was seized on June 9th: Nancy Grace - June 16th, 2005: PENHAUL: The only evidence that we can confirm we know has been taken was that, in the first raid on the three suspects` homes, which was a week ago last Thursday, we saw taken out of the Kalpoe brothers` houses a computer hard drive. And we also saw a silver gray Honda being impounded at that house.

Two sloot cars seized on June 15

Nancy Grace - June 15th, 2005:  GRACE: Richard, you`re preaching to the choir. We were all screaming that on day one. "Why don`t you impound the car in which she was taken from the bar, Carlos and Charlie`s?" Very quickly, back to CNN correspondent Karl Penhaul there in Aruba. Karl, you said two other cars have been impounded. Where did they come from?

PENHAUL: The two cars that were impounded today have come from Joran Van Der Sloot`s parents` homes. One may assume that they`re the parents` cars. It could be that Joran has his own car. We don`t know for sure. But that`s the house they were taken from, Nancy.


Deepak's car seized on June 9.  From May 31 that still leaves 8-9 days for work deepak described in statement to be done by "Automotive Enterprises."  Plenty of time, imo.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on August 10, 2006, 12:34:44 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Andre SANTOS:

http://www.stevegtennis.com/results/2003/q-f-aruba1.txt

Thanks Klaas.  In that one picture the four that you named are all involved.


Yep and include Koen, Guido and Jaime as others that know.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on August 10, 2006, 12:36:27 PM
Quote from: "the big hammer"
Total Cars Seized: 3.  On Different Days.

Kalpoe Honda seized on June 9 (per klaas above):

According to this article, the Kalpoe car was seized on June 9th: Nancy Grace - June 16th, 2005: PENHAUL: The only evidence that we can confirm we know has been taken was that, in the first raid on the three suspects` homes, which was a week ago last Thursday, we saw taken out of the Kalpoe brothers` houses a computer hard drive. And we also saw a silver gray Honda being impounded at that house.

Two sloot cars seized on June 15

Nancy Grace - June 15th, 2005:  GRACE: Richard, you`re preaching to the choir. We were all screaming that on day one. "Why don`t you impound the car in which she was taken from the bar, Carlos and Charlie`s?" Very quickly, back to CNN correspondent Karl Penhaul there in Aruba. Karl, you said two other cars have been impounded. Where did they come from?

PENHAUL: The two cars that were impounded today have come from Joran Van Der Sloot`s parents` homes. One may assume that they`re the parents` cars. It could be that Joran has his own car. We don`t know for sure. But that`s the house they were taken from, Nancy.


Deepak's car seized on June 9.  From May 31 that still leaves 8-9 days for work deepak described in statement to be done by "Automotive Enterprises."  Plenty of time, imo.


Hammer - yes, plenty of time to take care of his "problem"


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: San on August 10, 2006, 12:40:31 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Andre SANTOS:

http://www.stevegtennis.com/results/2003/q-f-aruba1.txt

Thanks Klaas.  In that one picture the four that you named are all involved.


Yep and include Koen, Guido and Jaime as others that know.

Right.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Kimmy53 on August 10, 2006, 12:42:17 PM
Quote from: "sharon"
http://blogsfornatalee.com/forums/index.php?topic=4461.msg144075#msg144075

I do not know how to post the pictures over here.

Kermit at BFN posted the MOST INTERESTING photos relating to the 'sneakers'.

And a NEW train of thought for us all.

He has a picture of Paulus -- with his KSwiss sneakers on :shock:

It's about midway down the page that I linked above.


Gosh sharon - that is interesting....Could the sneakers have been Paulus'?  Thus the need for the differing stories of the size of said sneakers? :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: San on August 10, 2006, 12:47:45 PM
Quote from: "the big hammer"
Total Cars Seized: 3.  On Different Days.

Kalpoe Honda seized on June 9 (per klaas above):

According to this article, the Kalpoe car was seized on June 9th: Nancy Grace - June 16th, 2005: PENHAUL: The only evidence that we can confirm we know has been taken was that, in the first raid on the three suspects` homes, which was a week ago last Thursday, we saw taken out of the Kalpoe brothers` houses a computer hard drive. And we also saw a silver gray Honda being impounded at that house.

Two sloot cars seized on June 15

Nancy Grace - June 15th, 2005:  GRACE: Richard, you`re preaching to the choir. We were all screaming that on day one. "Why don`t you impound the car in which she was taken from the bar, Carlos and Charlie`s?" Very quickly, back to CNN correspondent Karl Penhaul there in Aruba. Karl, you said two other cars have been impounded. Where did they come from?

PENHAUL: The two cars that were impounded today have come from Joran Van Der Sloot`s parents` homes. One may assume that they`re the parents` cars. It could be that Joran has his own car. We don`t know for sure. But that`s the house they were taken from, Nancy.


Deepak's car seized on June 9.  From May 31 that still leaves 8-9 days for work deepak described in statement to be done by "Automotive Enterprises."  Plenty of time, imo.

I asked my nephew yesterday if work like this can be done in two days and he said yes.  So if you have the stuff to replace it sounds like it could be done.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on August 10, 2006, 12:48:17 PM
Quote from: "Kimmy53"
Quote from: "sharon"
http://blogsfornatalee.com/forums/index.php?topic=4461.msg144075#msg144075

I do not know how to post the pictures over here.

Kermit at BFN posted the MOST INTERESTING photos relating to the 'sneakers'.

And a NEW train of thought for us all.

He has a picture of Paulus -- with his KSwiss sneakers on :shock:

It's about midway down the page that I linked above.


Gosh sharon - that is interesting....Could the sneakers have been Paulus'?  Thus the need for the differing stories of the size of said sneakers? :shock:


We had that discussion at SM a couple months ago when the information came out about Joran wearing a 10 1/2 shoe.  I believe it's entirely possible that Anita switched the tag in the shoe.  Paulus would in my opinion wear a 10 1/2.  Joran would definately wear closer to a 14.  Could be they thought switching the tags would have ALE looking for a size 10 1/2 missing shoe instead of a 14 missing shoe.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: blah on August 10, 2006, 12:49:27 PM
Quote from: "the big hammer"
Blood In Kalpoe Car


FROM DEEPAK'S JUNE 16TH STATEMENT: To your question whether I can state anything about the case of the missing girl, I can say the following. Joran had made up the story that there were traces of blood in my car. My car was ripped open by the police and one could see that was this was a lie.

This is the third mention of blood in car:

1.  FBI to BHT early on.
2.  Obduber to Beth during meeting
3.  Here in deepak's June 16 statement, attributed to jvds.

Deepak arrested/detained June 9.  Description of items impounded does not include car on that day.  There was a timeline posted indicating kalpoe car was impounded and seized by polis on June 13.

Point being of course that visit to Automotive Enterprises to "fix flat" could hvae easily preceded June 9 arrest.  And date of this statement -- June 16 -- follows car siezing on the 13th.  If sieze date is June 13, just because polis throughly searched car, does not make this statement true.

Can we confirm date of kalpoe car seizure by ALE?  TIA.


Deepaks car was taken at the same time (or at least same day) that he was arrested.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: nomad on August 10, 2006, 12:51:07 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "the big hammer"
Blood In Kalpoe Car


FROM DEEPAK'S JUNE 16TH STATEMENT: To your question whether I can state anything about the case of the missing girl, I can say the following. Joran had made up the story that there were traces of blood in my car. My car was ripped open by the police and one could see that was this was a lie.

This is the third mention of blood in car:

1.  FBI to BHT early on.
2.  Obduber to Beth during meeting
3.  Here in deepak's June 16 statement, attributed to jvds.

Deepak arrested/detained June 9.  Description of items impounded does not include car on that day.  There was a timeline posted indicating kalpoe car was impounded and seized by polis on June 13.

Point being of course that visit to Automotive Enterprises to "fix flat" could hvae easily preceded June 9 arrest.  And date of this statement -- June 16 -- follows car siezing on the 13th.  If sieze date is June 13, just because polis throughly searched car, does not make this statement true.

Can we confirm date of kalpoe car seizure by ALE?  TIA.


HAMMER - According to this article, the Kalpoe car was seized on June 9th:

Nancy Grace - June 16th, 2005

GRACE: Well, there has been many days since Natalee went missing.

Very quickly, back to Karl Penhaul, CNN correspondent there in Aruba. Karl, what can you tell us about this evidence that was seized? We know many bags of evidence were taken from these three suspects` home.

And let`s get it straight, Karl. At the beginning, two minority security guards were arrested, all right, taken into custody in connection with Natalee`s disappearance. The three young men that took her from the bar, Carlos and Charlie`s, that night, were not arrested. They were questioned and released. Now they`re behind bars, and the two security guards have been released. Now, what was in the evidence taken from these three young men`s home?

PENHAUL: The only evidence that we can confirm we know has been taken was that, in the first raid on the three suspects` homes, which was a week ago last Thursday, we saw taken out of the Kalpoe brothers` houses a computer hard drive. And we also saw a silver gray Honda being impounded at that house.


(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/June2005.jpg)



Good afternoon Monkeys!  Haven't been able to be online for several days.  
I am so far behind; am going to go back to read. I hope everyone is well. Even tho' I mostly read, I missed everyone!

I came across this information and it is important, IMO.    It PLACES Deepak's car in FBI CUSTODY JUNE 2, 2005!! [/color]

Natalee Ann Holloway, last seen driving away from a local nightclub. FBI and local police have questioned a man she befriended at the bar. His car is in FBI custody tonight.
6-2  Nancy Grace
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0506/02/ng.01.html


From this information, we could assume the FBI pre-emptively tested for blood, and those tests were positive as early as June 2??

Where was Deepak's car after June 2, when the FBI had custody of it, until June 13 (if this is the correct date), when it was seized by ALE??  Say from June 3 until June 13, there were 10 days when someone could have changed the liner's, etc. changing the blood into cleaning fluid and chocolate.

This is sooooooo frustrating. Hammer, I hope this helps you out!  :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: blah on August 10, 2006, 12:53:19 PM
Quote from: "Kimmy53"
Quote from: "the big hammer"
Blood In Kalpoe Car


FROM DEEPAK'S JUNE 16TH STATEMENT: To your question whether I can state anything about the case of the missing girl, I can say the following. Joran had made up the story that there were traces of blood in my car. My car was ripped open by the police and one could see that was this was a lie.

This is the third mention of blood in car:

1.  FBI to BHT early on.
2.  Obduber to Beth during meeting
3.  Here in deepak's June 16 statement, attributed to jvds.

Deepak arrested/detained June 9.  Description of items impounded does not include car on that day.  There was a timeline posted indicating kalpoe car was impounded and seized by polis on June 13.

Point being of course that visit to Automotive Enterprises to "fix flat" could hvae easily preceded June 9 arrest.  And date of this statement -- June 16 -- follows car siezing on the 13th.  If sieze date is June 13, just because polis throughly searched car, does not make this statement true.

Can we confirm date of kalpoe car seizure by ALE?  TIA.


Along a similar line:  Where would Joran get info to tell that there was traces of blood in the car?  

Could be an attempted set up - Could be that Joran knew there were traces in the car without being told.  Could be that someone was feeding Joran information as to mold his stories around it.


also, why would Deepak be telling this to one of the police officers?  The police would know if Joran made it up or not, they wouldnt need Deepak to tell them that.  Kinda strange.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Kimmy53 on August 10, 2006, 12:56:09 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Kimmy53"
Quote from: "sharon"
http://blogsfornatalee.com/forums/index.php?topic=4461.msg144075#msg144075

I do not know how to post the pictures over here.

Kermit at BFN posted the MOST INTERESTING photos relating to the 'sneakers'.

And a NEW train of thought for us all.

He has a picture of Paulus -- with his KSwiss sneakers on :shock:

It's about midway down the page that I linked above.


Gosh sharon - that is interesting....Could the sneakers have been Paulus'?  Thus the need for the differing stories of the size of said sneakers? :shock:


We had that discussion at SM a couple months ago when the information came out about Joran wearing a 10 1/2 shoe.  I believe it's entirely possible that Anita switched the tag in the shoe.  Paulus would in my opinion wear a 10 1/2.  Joran would definately wear closer to a 14.  Could be they thought switching the tags would have ALE looking for a size 10 1/2 missing shoe instead of a 14 missing shoe.


I agree Klaas - With Joran's height, a 14 would be closer to right that the 10 1/2 - Strikes me as curious that there are SO many mentions of the shoes.  Convinces me that there is more to them than just the loss of them.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on August 10, 2006, 12:56:32 PM
Quote from: "nomad"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "the big hammer"
Blood In Kalpoe Car


FROM DEEPAK'S JUNE 16TH STATEMENT: To your question whether I can state anything about the case of the missing girl, I can say the following. Joran had made up the story that there were traces of blood in my car. My car was ripped open by the police and one could see that was this was a lie.

This is the third mention of blood in car:

1.  FBI to BHT early on.
2.  Obduber to Beth during meeting
3.  Here in deepak's June 16 statement, attributed to jvds.

Deepak arrested/detained June 9.  Description of items impounded does not include car on that day.  There was a timeline posted indicating kalpoe car was impounded and seized by polis on June 13.

Point being of course that visit to Automotive Enterprises to "fix flat" could hvae easily preceded June 9 arrest.  And date of this statement -- June 16 -- follows car siezing on the 13th.  If sieze date is June 13, just because polis throughly searched car, does not make this statement true.

Can we confirm date of kalpoe car seizure by ALE?  TIA.


HAMMER - According to this article, the Kalpoe car was seized on June 9th:

Nancy Grace - June 16th, 2005

GRACE: Well, there has been many days since Natalee went missing.

Very quickly, back to Karl Penhaul, CNN correspondent there in Aruba. Karl, what can you tell us about this evidence that was seized? We know many bags of evidence were taken from these three suspects` home.

And let`s get it straight, Karl. At the beginning, two minority security guards were arrested, all right, taken into custody in connection with Natalee`s disappearance. The three young men that took her from the bar, Carlos and Charlie`s, that night, were not arrested. They were questioned and released. Now they`re behind bars, and the two security guards have been released. Now, what was in the evidence taken from these three young men`s home?

PENHAUL: The only evidence that we can confirm we know has been taken was that, in the first raid on the three suspects` homes, which was a week ago last Thursday, we saw taken out of the Kalpoe brothers` houses a computer hard drive. And we also saw a silver gray Honda being impounded at that house.


(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/June2005.jpg)



Good afternoon Monkeys!  Haven't been able to be online for several days.  
I am so far behind; am going to go back to read. I hope everyone is well. Even tho' I mostly read, I missed everyone!

I came across this information and it is important, IMO.    It PLACES Deepak's car in FBI CUSTODY JUNE 2, 2005!! [/color]

Natalee Ann Holloway, last seen driving away from a local nightclub. FBI and local police have questioned a man she befriended at the bar. His car is in FBI custody tonight.
6-2  Nancy Grace
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0506/02/ng.01.html


From this information, we could assume the FBI pre-emptively tested for blood, and those tests were positive as early as June 2??

Where was Deepak's car after June 2, when the FBI had custody of it, until June 13 (if this is the correct date), when it was seized by ALE??  Say from June 3 until June 13, there were 10 days when someone could have changed the liner's, etc. changing the blood into cleaning fluid and chocolate.

This is sooooooo frustrating. Hammer, I hope this helps you out!  :)


Ok, so on June 2nd the car was in FBI custody - this is when they said there was blood all over the car.  BUT...it was NOT impounded until June 9th.  Nice of them to allow Deepak time to have the interior switched out  :roll:   Wonder if Paulus paid for that too?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: San on August 10, 2006, 12:58:19 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"


Ok, so on June 2nd the car was in FBI custody - this is when they said there was blood all over the car.  BUT...it was NOT impounded until June 9th.  Nice of them to allow Deepak time to have the interior switched out  :roll:   Wonder if Paulus paid for that too?

Not only did Paulus pay them he paid them extra for the rush job and to also keep quiet.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on August 10, 2006, 01:01:58 PM
NEW FRONT PAGE POST and PIC by VANDERBILT:

Essence de Aruba, What is the Smell?


www.scaredmonkeys.com


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: sharon on August 10, 2006, 01:02:50 PM
Quote from: "Kimmy53"
Quote from: "sharon"
http://blogsfornatalee.com/forums/index.php?topic=4461.msg144075#msg144075

I do not know how to post the pictures over here.

Kermit at BFN posted the MOST INTERESTING photos relating to the 'sneakers'.

And a NEW train of thought for us all.

He has a picture of Paulus -- with his KSwiss sneakers on :shock:

It's about midway down the page that I linked above.


Gosh sharon - that is interesting....Could the sneakers have been Paulus'?  Thus the need for the differing stories of the size of said sneakers? :shock:


That's what I'm thinking Kimmy53.

The missing sneakers belong to Paulus. And Joran is doing damage control by saying that they were his.

And if those are/were sneakers in the pond in the still shots from the Chicago video -- I'm going to guess that they belonged to Paul.

D to J: Your own father. Unbelievable.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Ono on August 10, 2006, 01:05:24 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Andre SANTOS:

http://www.stevegtennis.com/results/2003/q-f-aruba1.txt

Thanks Klaas.  In that one picture the four that you named are all involved.


Yep and include Koen, Guido and Jaime as others that know.


Yes..absolutely.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: nomad on August 10, 2006, 01:06:04 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "nomad"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "the big hammer"
Blood In Kalpoe Car


FROM DEEPAK'S JUNE 16TH STATEMENT: To your question whether I can state anything about the case of the missing girl, I can say the following. Joran had made up the story that there were traces of blood in my car. My car was ripped open by the police and one could see that was this was a lie.

This is the third mention of blood in car:

1.  FBI to BHT early on.
2.  Obduber to Beth during meeting
3.  Here in deepak's June 16 statement, attributed to jvds.

Deepak arrested/detained June 9.  Description of items impounded does not include car on that day.  There was a timeline posted indicating kalpoe car was impounded and seized by polis on June 13.

Point being of course that visit to Automotive Enterprises to "fix flat" could hvae easily preceded June 9 arrest.  And date of this statement -- June 16 -- follows car siezing on the 13th.  If sieze date is June 13, just because polis throughly searched car, does not make this statement true.

Can we confirm date of kalpoe car seizure by ALE?  TIA.


HAMMER - According to this article, the Kalpoe car was seized on June 9th:

Nancy Grace - June 16th, 2005

GRACE: Well, there has been many days since Natalee went missing.

Very quickly, back to Karl Penhaul, CNN correspondent there in Aruba. Karl, what can you tell us about this evidence that was seized? We know many bags of evidence were taken from these three suspects` home.

And let`s get it straight, Karl. At the beginning, two minority security guards were arrested, all right, taken into custody in connection with Natalee`s disappearance. The three young men that took her from the bar, Carlos and Charlie`s, that night, were not arrested. They were questioned and released. Now they`re behind bars, and the two security guards have been released. Now, what was in the evidence taken from these three young men`s home?

PENHAUL: The only evidence that we can confirm we know has been taken was that, in the first raid on the three suspects` homes, which was a week ago last Thursday, we saw taken out of the Kalpoe brothers` houses a computer hard drive. And we also saw a silver gray Honda being impounded at that house.


(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/June2005.jpg)



Good afternoon Monkeys!  Haven't been able to be online for several days.  
I am so far behind; am going to go back to read. I hope everyone is well. Even tho' I mostly read, I missed everyone!

I came across this information and it is important, IMO.    It PLACES Deepak's car in FBI CUSTODY JUNE 2, 2005!! [/color]

Natalee Ann Holloway, last seen driving away from a local nightclub. FBI and local police have questioned a man she befriended at the bar. His car is in FBI custody tonight.
6-2  Nancy Grace
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0506/02/ng.01.html


From this information, we could assume the FBI pre-emptively tested for blood, and those tests were positive as early as June 2??

Where was Deepak's car after June 2, when the FBI had custody of it, until June 13 (if this is the correct date), when it was seized by ALE??  Say from June 3 until June 13, there were 10 days when someone could have changed the liner's, etc. changing the blood into cleaning fluid and chocolate.

This is sooooooo frustrating. Hammer, I hope this helps you out!  :)


Ok, so on June 2nd the car was in FBI custody - this is when they said there was blood all over the car.  BUT...it was NOT impounded until June 9th.  Nice of them to allow Deepak time to have the interior switched out  :roll:   Wonder if Paulus paid for that too?


Klaas, Hi! Do you know the date Oduber stated in front of Beth and Jug on TV, that there was blood in Deepak's car? Seems Paulus is loose and free with the money where it matters most, doesn't it? I hope you are well!  Thank you for all the work and pics. Do we know who the other un-named guy is in the last photo you posted?  

San.....hope your arm and hand are progressing!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Ono on August 10, 2006, 01:07:12 PM
Quote from: "the big hammer"
Total Cars Seized: 3.  On Different Days.

Kalpoe Honda seized on June 9 (per klaas above):

According to this article, the Kalpoe car was seized on June 9th: Nancy Grace - June 16th, 2005: PENHAUL: The only evidence that we can confirm we know has been taken was that, in the first raid on the three suspects` homes, which was a week ago last Thursday, we saw taken out of the Kalpoe brothers` houses a computer hard drive. And we also saw a silver gray Honda being impounded at that house.

Two sloot cars seized on June 15

Nancy Grace - June 15th, 2005:  GRACE: Richard, you`re preaching to the choir. We were all screaming that on day one. "Why don`t you impound the car in which she was taken from the bar, Carlos and Charlie`s?" Very quickly, back to CNN correspondent Karl Penhaul there in Aruba. Karl, you said two other cars have been impounded. Where did they come from?

PENHAUL: The two cars that were impounded today have come from Joran Van Der Sloot`s parents` homes. One may assume that they`re the parents` cars. It could be that Joran has his own car. We don`t know for sure. But that`s the house they were taken from, Nancy.


Deepak's car seized on June 9.  From May 31 that still leaves 8-9 days for work deepak described in statement to be done by "Automotive Enterprises."  Plenty of time, imo.


Plenty of time and it appears from Satish's sarcasm, that's what he's referring to.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on August 10, 2006, 01:08:22 PM
Just posted another JUNE 10th statement from SATISH


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: San on August 10, 2006, 01:08:42 PM
Quote from: "nomad"

Klaas, Hi! Do you know the date Oduber stated in front of Beth and Jug on TV, that there was blood in Deepak's car? Seems Paulus is loose and free with the money where it matters most, doesn't it? I hope you are well!  Thank you for all the work and pics. Do we know who the other un-named guy is in the last photo you posted?  

San.....hope your arm and hand are progressing!

It is thank you for asking.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: nomad on August 10, 2006, 01:13:02 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "nomad"

Klaas, Hi! Do you know the date Oduber stated in front of Beth and Jug on TV, that there was blood in Deepak's car? Seems Paulus is loose and free with the money where it matters most, doesn't it? I hope you are well!  Thank you for all the work and pics. Do we know who the other un-named guy is in the last photo you posted?  

San.....hope your arm and hand are progressing!

It is thank you for asking.


Your welcome, San. I have a similar problem, only in my left leg and foot. It was doing fairly well, but on Monday, I fell. Now it is numb again, yet pains, and I can barely walk.  I've been praying for you. I am so happy to hear you are having an improvement.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Ono on August 10, 2006, 01:14:30 PM
Quote from: "Kimmy53"
Quote from: "sharon"
http://blogsfornatalee.com/forums/index.php?topic=4461.msg144075#msg144075

I do not know how to post the pictures over here.

Kermit at BFN posted the MOST INTERESTING photos relating to the 'sneakers'.

And a NEW train of thought for us all.

He has a picture of Paulus -- with his KSwiss sneakers on :shock:

It's about midway down the page that I linked above.


Gosh sharon - that is interesting....Could the sneakers have been Paulus'?  Thus the need for the differing stories of the size of said sneakers? :shock:


 :shock:  Comparing those two pictures, Paulus' sneakers have three navy stripes while it looks like Joran's have two. How many stripes did the beaten up ones Joran paraded in front of Greta have?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Kimmy53 on August 10, 2006, 01:17:43 PM
I have no statement to make - I have no statement to make - I have no statement to make :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Ono on August 10, 2006, 01:19:47 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "klaasend"


Ok, so on June 2nd the car was in FBI custody - this is when they said there was blood all over the car.  BUT...it was NOT impounded until June 9th.  Nice of them to allow Deepak time to have the interior switched out  :roll:   Wonder if Paulus paid for that too?

Not only did Paulus pay them he paid them extra for the rush job and to also keep quiet.


And remember, the FBI didn't have jurisdiction in order to follow through legally with what they found, but it was witnessed by them thank goodness.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Ono on August 10, 2006, 01:22:04 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
NEW FRONT PAGE POST and PIC by VANDERBILT:

Essence de Aruba, What is the Smell?


www.scaredmonkeys.com


Vanderbilt's work is superb.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 10, 2006, 01:24:03 PM
Quote from: "Kimmy53"
I have no statement to make - I have no statement to make - I have no statement to make :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:


Because Satish cannot remember what he was 'suppose' to say'!
(http://bestsmileys.com/paranoid/1.gif)

By the way....is he still in high school?? How many years does it take to finish a Senior year? SPEAKING OF THAT, this has no connection to the case, but I was wondering when Joran graduated....? He had school the day after Nat went missing, then he was in jail for most of the summer. When was Joran's graduation? Just curious.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: San on August 10, 2006, 01:25:10 PM
Quote from: "Kimmy53"
I have no statement to make - I have no statement to make - I have no statement to make :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:

Isn't that just unbelievable.

After he answers the last question he goes blank.  How do you not know if Joran introduced you or not.  Satish is guilty big time.

How late did you arrive in Carlos & Charlies on Sunday May 29th 2005?

We had arrived at approximately 23.30 in Carlos & Charlies on that Sunday.

How did you meet/get to know the girl in Carlos & Charlies?

I have nothing more to state about that day.

Did Joran introduce the girl to you?

I don't know.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Ono on August 10, 2006, 01:26:17 PM
Joran was arrested the day of his graduation and missed the exercises, I believe.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: San on August 10, 2006, 01:26:20 PM
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "klaasend"


Ok, so on June 2nd the car was in FBI custody - this is when they said there was blood all over the car.  BUT...it was NOT impounded until June 9th.  Nice of them to allow Deepak time to have the interior switched out  :roll:   Wonder if Paulus paid for that too?

Not only did Paulus pay them he paid them extra for the rush job and to also keep quiet.


And remember, the FBI didn't have jurisdiction in order to follow through legally with what they found, but it was witnessed by them thank goodness.

That's when Aruba tried to make the FBI look like fools.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Ono on August 10, 2006, 01:29:05 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "klaasend"


Ok, so on June 2nd the car was in FBI custody - this is when they said there was blood all over the car.  BUT...it was NOT impounded until June 9th.  Nice of them to allow Deepak time to have the interior switched out  :roll:   Wonder if Paulus paid for that too?

Not only did Paulus pay them he paid them extra for the rush job and to also keep quiet.


And remember, the FBI didn't have jurisdiction in order to follow through legally with what they found, but it was witnessed by them thank goodness.

That's when Aruba tried to make the FBI look like fools.


Absolutely, and don't you know that the level of frustration of the FBI has been totally intense ?? They've probably popped all their blood vessels!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: the big hammer on August 10, 2006, 01:48:11 PM
FBI Has Car "In Custody" on June 2?

Let's look at article body for reference and further detail.  Here are only two mentions of FBI in article:

1. But first, an urgent request for your help tonight. This beautiful Alabama girl leaves on her senior trip to Aruba and disappears. Natalee Ann Holloway, last seen driving away from a local nightclub. FBI and local police have questioned a man she befriended at the bar. His car is in FBI custody tonight.

2.  DERSTRATEN: Yes. We have a lot of police. We went to the TV. We let see the portrait and asked for tips. We checked all the tips we get. But until now, we have nothing on this small island.

And the investigation is going on, too. And I hope you can understand, I can`t tell everything about the investigation. But we are still going on with about 16 police officers, together with the FBI. They were on the island, too.

GRACE: So the FBI is there?

DERSTRATEN: Yes, we are working close together. He arrived yesterday, and we picked him up at the airport. And...

******************************************************

Strange -- but I can't see any mention of a car in custody during the interview portion of the transcript, but it's clearly stated in the story header.  Also, no mention of whose car is in custody.

As we know too, FBI efforts were curtailed (and even as late as August, sloot defense was filing motions to prevent the FBI from entering the case).  Don't know how car could be in their custody, as per van der Straaten, they'd just arrived on the island.

But it does say the FBI has the car.

Nice find, nomad.  But I can't make sense of this one, yet.  It could be a simple mistake, it could be a presumption -- as most American reporters/writers might simply presume this would happen in any investigation, or it could even be a planted story.  And on the plant version: maybe FBI knew early on what was happening here, and sent a flare up.

Regardless, I'll bet when paulus heard/watched this broadcast, he must have drowned the family dogs in his sweat.  

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 10, 2006, 02:02:39 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Kimmy53"
I have no statement to make - I have no statement to make - I have no statement to make :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:

Isn't that just unbelievable.

After he answers the last question he goes blank.  How do you not know if Joran introduced you or not.  Satish is guilty big time.

How late did you arrive in Carlos & Charlies on Sunday May 29th 2005?

We had arrived at approximately 23.30 in Carlos & Charlies on that Sunday.

How did you meet/get to know the girl in Carlos & Charlies?

I have nothing more to state about that day.

Did Joran introduce the girl to you?

I don't know.


ECHO......he does not remember what he is SUPPOSE to say.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on August 10, 2006, 02:03:42 PM
HAMMER - Could the FBI and ALE looked at the car at the Kalpoe residence on June 2nd without impounding it?  Somehow the information came out that there was blood in the car, that was around June 2nd I believe.  If it wasn't actually impounded until June 9th, plenty of time to switch out interiors.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on August 10, 2006, 02:04:26 PM
I need to get some work done so I'll be lurking and not posting.  BBL


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: igsigs on August 10, 2006, 02:11:20 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
HAMMER - Could the FBI and ALE looked at the car at the Kalpoe residence on June 2nd without impounding it?  Somehow the information came out that there was blood in the car, that was around June 2nd I believe.  If it wasn't actually impounded until June 9th, plenty of time to switch out interiors.

I don't think it was impounded until 6/9. Arubagirl stated that when Deepak came in for questioning on 6/2 his car was "looked at" by ALE and described as "too clean". Anybody remember that?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: JuJu on August 10, 2006, 02:15:06 PM
Hi Monkeys!  I need some help!  I don't have time to sit on the computer and read these statements, so I print them so I can read them later.  I am having a problem printing because it cuts off part of the right side and it is driving me nuts!   HELP!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: sharon on August 10, 2006, 02:22:01 PM
Quote from: "JuJu"
Hi Monkeys!  I need some help!  I don't have time to sit on the computer and read these statements, so I print them so I can read them later.  I am having a problem printing because it cuts off part of the right side and it is driving me nuts!   HELP!!!


Gosh JuJu -- I'm not a techie so I'd have to ask you lots of questions before I could help :oops: Sorry.

In the interim, maybe if you set your page to print 'landscape' (if it's not already) it will stop cutting off.

It would be the first thing I would try (before I called tech support :D )


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on August 10, 2006, 02:25:30 PM
Good Afternoon to all..............

I just read all the statements.

UNBELIEVABLE!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: JuJu on August 10, 2006, 02:26:58 PM
Thanks Sharon, I decided to just copy & paste to word and print.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Mere on August 10, 2006, 02:27:48 PM
Quote from: "JuJu"
Hi Monkeys!  I need some help!  I don't have time to sit on the computer and read these statements, so I print them so I can read them later.  I am having a problem printing because it cuts off part of the right side and it is driving me nuts!   HELP!!!


I highlight the statement, then I copy and paste to my mailbox...as though I am going to mail it to someone....then I print it.....it captures all of the material....from side to side....make any sense?  :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on August 10, 2006, 02:32:26 PM
Joran is a PIG.

Satish is an a$$wipe and Depak Tupac is a LIAR!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on August 10, 2006, 02:33:27 PM
Quote from: "MeMere"
Quote from: "JuJu"
Hi Monkeys!  I need some help!  I don't have time to sit on the computer and read these statements, so I print them so I can read them later.  I am having a problem printing because it cuts off part of the right side and it is driving me nuts!   HELP!!!


I highlight the statement, then I copy and paste to my mailbox...as though I am going to mail it to someone....then I print it.....it captures all of the material....from side to side....make any sense?  :)


Hi Sweetheart!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Mere on August 10, 2006, 02:37:00 PM
Hi miss mermaid..... :D  

Reading these Interrogations does make one ill...it makes this case real....as if we didn't know already....and it makes me wonder why they are walking the streets of Aruba or any other country....!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Shizaru on August 10, 2006, 02:38:36 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "klaasend"
HAMMER - Could the FBI and ALE looked at the car at the Kalpoe residence on June 2nd without impounding it?  Somehow the information came out that there was blood in the car, that was around June 2nd I believe.  If it wasn't actually impounded until June 9th, plenty of time to switch out interiors.

I don't think it was impounded until 6/9. Arubagirl stated that when Deepak came in for questioning on 6/2 his car was "looked at" by ALE and described as "too clean". Anybody remember that?


Yes.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on August 10, 2006, 02:42:46 PM
Quote from: "Kimmy53"
I have no statement to make - I have no statement to make - I have no statement to make :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:


Kimmy are you stuck?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: robots on August 10, 2006, 02:44:17 PM
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"
Joran is a PIG.

Satish is an a$$wipe and Depak Tupac is a LIAR!


i hate them  :evil:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on August 10, 2006, 02:45:53 PM
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"
Joran is a PIG.

Satish is an a$$wipe and Depak Tupac is a LIAR!


i hate them  :evil:


me 2 :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Shizaru on August 10, 2006, 02:46:34 PM
Quote from: "Shizaru"
Quote from: "Shizaru"
Joran 6/15 statement says the Bubali interview was on Tues May 31.  

So when Deepak said he vaccumed the car the day before the Bubali interview, because Joran had almost fallen in the water and then sat down in the car with sand on him, he was referring to an incident on Monday, the day Natalee went missing.


Edit: 6/14 statement.


Rereading the statement, I think Deeapk was just confused about the date here.  I think he's talking about the vaccuming which he claims occured at around 11:00 pm on Sunday, which technically would have been 2 days before the Bubali interview.   So it's not that he vacuumed on two consecutive days for two different reasons (ants on Sunday sand on Monday), it's that he's given two diferent reasons for the same vaccuming.  One could also speculate that perhaps this was a Freudian slip in his 6/14 statement, and the vaccuming was actually on Monday, after Natalee was in the car not before.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Shizaru on August 10, 2006, 02:48:27 PM
Quote from: "Shizaru"
Quote from: "Shizaru"
Quote from: "Shizaru"
Joran 6/15 statement says the Bubali interview was on Tues May 31.  

So when Deepak said he vaccumed the car the day before the Bubali interview, because Joran had almost fallen in the water and then sat down in the car with sand on him, he was referring to an incident on Monday, the day Natalee went missing.


Edit: 6/14 statement.


Rereading the statement, I think Deeapk was just confused about the date here.  I think he's talking about the vaccuming which he claims occured at around 11:00 pm on Sunday, which technically would have been 2 days before the Bubali interview.   So it's not that he vacuumed on two consecutive days for two different reasons (ants on Sunday sand on Monday), it's that he's given two diferent reasons for the same vaccuming.  One could also speculate that perhaps this was a Freudian slip in his 6/14 statement, and the vaccuming was actually on Monday, after Natalee was in the car not before.


I mean 6/10 statement)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Kimmy53 on August 10, 2006, 02:49:13 PM
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"
Quote from: "Kimmy53"
I have no statement to make - I have no statement to make - I have no statement to make :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:


Kimmy are you stuck?


Hey dearest mermaid!  I was just mocking Satish - Gosh it makes me so mad!!! He wouldn't answer the simplest of questions. Their statements are NO BRAINERS!  Anyone who reads these should be able to see they are hiding something - that they KNOW!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on August 10, 2006, 02:53:41 PM
Quote from: "Kimmy53"
[
Hey dearest mermaid!  I was just mocking Satish - Gosh it makes me so mad!!! He wouldn't answer the simplest of questions. Their statements are NO BRAINERS!  Anyone who reads these should be able to see they are hiding something - that they KNOW!
[/b]

Agreed.

But my anger is truly geared for the people who covered it up.

 I have no place in my heart for the suspects, but I am as much, if not more discusted by the ones who Mis Investigated.....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: JuJu on August 10, 2006, 02:54:14 PM
Did the piece of chit Paulus make any statements to ALE?  If so I would really like to see those.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: WidgetTheMidget on August 10, 2006, 02:59:06 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "Kimmy53"
[
Hey dearest mermaid!  I was just mocking Satish - Gosh it makes me so mad!!! He wouldn't answer the simplest of questions. Their statements are NO BRAINERS!  Anyone who reads these should be able to see they are hiding something - that they KNOW!
[/b]

Agreed.

But my anger is truly geared for the people who covered it up.

 I have no place in my heart for the suspects, but I am as much, if not more discusted by the ones who Mis Investigated.....


When He Least Expects It ...

Joran Will Get His ............

Once The Case Is Dismissed ..........

Hunting Season Opens .............

 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: WidgetTheMidget on August 10, 2006, 03:01:07 PM
Jacquie .............

Get Your Broom ............

We Swept The Pods ...........

 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on August 10, 2006, 03:01:53 PM
Widget:
Mets just swept Padres...

Check out the Monkey Lounge post I made for Sport Fans.
Think you'll like it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on August 10, 2006, 03:07:48 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Widget:
Mets just swept Padres...

Check out the Monkey Lounge post I made for Sport Fans.
Think you'll like it.


Hi Twinkletoes!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on August 10, 2006, 03:08:43 PM
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Widget:
Mets just swept Padres...

Check out the Monkey Lounge post I made for Sport Fans.
Think you'll like it.


Hi Twinkletoes!


Hey baby!!!!!!!!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: mrs. red on August 10, 2006, 03:20:41 PM
Hey Monkey Peeps!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on August 10, 2006, 03:20:57 PM
NEW FRONT PAGE POST - CELL PHONE RECORDS, Joran 5/30

www.scaredmonkeys.com


They will also be in a thread in the forum in a couple minutes!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: oldfart on August 10, 2006, 03:26:29 PM
Hi gang...
Just peeking in for a bit..

I remember hearing some DEA or former DEA person and Art Wood say that there are many competent and professional members of the Aruban police force.

Anyone else remember hearing those type of statements?

If so why were those conducting the interviews about as competent  and  professional as






(http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c314/OldF/3be1ee2b.gif)

JMO and Just wondering

BBL
SeeYaByeeeeeeeeeee


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: mrs. red on August 10, 2006, 03:26:49 PM
Thank you for all of your hard work Klaasend... I know this is very tedious and time consuming....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on August 10, 2006, 03:27:32 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Thank you for all of your hard work Klaasend... I know this is very tedious and time consuming....


Yep, lol - you're welcome!  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: sharon on August 10, 2006, 03:29:53 PM
Yes -- thanks Klaas.

And Red and Tom and Mrs.

And thank you to whoever it is finally getting the 'facts' out there.

Oh Uncle Jan Dirty Hand VanderStraaten -- you've got some 'xplainin' to do.


.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on August 10, 2006, 03:32:31 PM
There is a lot of hard work being put into this...

But all the info we are privy to, has been viewed by the "investigators" in this case.  

I don't think it's ever been a matter that the clues were not there, or the evidence, but that it was ignored or discarded.

I hiope I am  wrong but I think the next big Fireworks in this case will be that it is closed.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on August 10, 2006, 03:32:50 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
NEW FRONT PAGE POST - CELL PHONE RECORDS, Joran 5/30

www.scaredmonkeys.com


They will also be in a thread in the forum in a couple minutes!


Link to the thread in the forum as well:

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=191


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Mere on August 10, 2006, 03:34:19 PM
Thank you Klaas.....!

Thank you Red and the mrs......and Tom.

A special thanks to the person(s) putting out the information.....when information is available, it is hard for these suspects and the persons covering them to hide.....

IMHO.....Mere


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Anna on August 10, 2006, 03:40:11 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "klaasend"
NEW FRONT PAGE POST - CELL PHONE RECORDS, Joran 5/30

www.scaredmonkeys.com


They will also be in a thread in the forum in a couple minutes!


Link to the thread in the forum as well:

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=191



 :shock:  :?  :roll:  :?


But what does it mean?  I know it is hopefully the first of the phone records but I can't sense of it at all.  This is around 7 in the evening before Beth arrives in Aruba?

Do I even have the time approx correct?

Uncle Jan is supposed to be in supervisory/commissioner/administrative position only and not questioning his "best friend's son"!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on August 10, 2006, 03:41:46 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "klaasend"
NEW FRONT PAGE POST - CELL PHONE RECORDS, Joran 5/30

www.scaredmonkeys.com


They will also be in a thread in the forum in a couple minutes!


Link to the thread in the forum as well:

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=191



 :shock:  :?  :roll:  :?


But what does it mean?  I know it is hopefully the first of the phone records but I can't sense of it at all.  This is around 7 in the evening before Beth arrives in Aruba?

Do I even have the time approx correct?

Uncle Jan is supposed to be in supervisory/commissioner/administrative position only and not questioning his "best friend's son"!


We really need Atlmetroguy to look at these. What it looks like to me is Joran said he was in the area of the Radisson and Wyndham at 7ish on May 30th..but, his cell phone put him in the area of the Lighthouse.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: mrs. red on August 10, 2006, 03:42:05 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
There is a lot of hard work being put into this...

But all the info we are privy to, has been viewed by the "investigators" in this case.  

I don't think it's ever been a matter that the clues were not there, or the evidence, but that it was ignored or discarded.

I hiope I am  wrong but I think the next big Fireworks in this case will be that it is closed.


Maybe... but I still have hope that eventually there will be justice


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: sharon on August 10, 2006, 03:43:12 PM
So -- what he is saying is --

Monday night -- Joran called Deepak at work (I thought Deepak called Joran)

Joran says he's at the casino in his statements
Deepak says Joran says he's at the casino in his statements

But cell phone records indicate Joran's at the Lighthouse.


And yet, they are both walking free :twisted:



.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: thik on August 10, 2006, 03:45:14 PM
"EVIL" FLOURISHES WHEN 'NOTHING' IS DONE'' !!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Frijole on August 10, 2006, 03:47:22 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "klaasend"
NEW FRONT PAGE POST - CELL PHONE RECORDS, Joran 5/30

www.scaredmonkeys.com


They will also be in a thread in the forum in a couple minutes!


Link to the thread in the forum as well:

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=191



 :shock:  :?  :roll:  :?


But what does it mean?  I know it is hopefully the first of the phone records but I can't sense of it at all.  This is around 7 in the evening before Beth arrives in Aruba?

Do I even have the time approx correct?

Uncle Jan is supposed to be in supervisory/commissioner/administrative position only and not questioning his "best friend's son"!


We really need Atlmetroguy to look at these. What it looks like to me is Joran said he was in the area of the Radisson and Wyndham at 7ish on May 30th..but, his cell phone put him in the area of the Lighthouse.


Hmmm.... so this is what he and Deepak were doing prior to Beth's arrival.... Very interesting... Trying to find something?  hide something?  bury something?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Frijole on August 10, 2006, 03:49:37 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
There is a lot of hard work being put into this...

But all the info we are privy to, has been viewed by the "investigators" in this case.  

I don't think it's ever been a matter that the clues were not there, or the evidence, but that it was ignored or discarded.

I hiope I am  wrong but I think the next big Fireworks in this case will be that it is closed.


Maybe... but I still have hope that eventually there will be justice


I agree.  It is awfully hard to this case to be closed and shoved under the rug  when these documents are all out there for the world to see.  It is so obviously a cover up.

We need for this info to get organized into obvious discrepancies to prove the cover up and get it beyond the world of blogs and into the mass media so that there is no choice but for action to be taken.  JMHO


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: mrs. red on August 10, 2006, 03:51:14 PM
Quote from: "Frijole"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
There is a lot of hard work being put into this...

But all the info we are privy to, has been viewed by the "investigators" in this case.  

I don't think it's ever been a matter that the clues were not there, or the evidence, but that it was ignored or discarded.

I hiope I am  wrong but I think the next big Fireworks in this case will be that it is closed.


Maybe... but I still have hope that eventually there will be justice


I agree.  It is awfully hard to this case to be closed and shoved under the rug  when these documents are all out there for the world to see.  It is so obviously a cover up.

We need for this info to get organized into obvious discrepancies to prove the cover up and get it beyond the world of blogs and into the mass media so that there is no choice but for action to be taken.  JMHO


Well Nancy Grace is going to have something on regarding the case on Friday... maybe we should do an email campaign - start with her.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: terryd270 on August 10, 2006, 03:52:38 PM
If Greta had these records that we are seeing then how come she believes Joran?  Is John Q. Kelly in Aruba yet?  Has Karen J. come back from Holland?  I think the reward should goto $1,000,000 vs the $250,000.  We have seen everything is about money over on that island..I'm still thinking Joran is the main killer and the others are just pawns in Joran's game.. Too bad they don't have plea deals on that island..  So basically Joran's God Father is calling Joran a lier..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on August 10, 2006, 03:53:04 PM
How I read the cell phone record is that DEEPAK calls JORAN at around 7:25pm on May 30th from the Cyberzone.  Also, that Joran said he was in the area of the Radisson/Wyndham but the cell tower near the Lighthouse was picked up.  (I think :wink: )


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Shell on August 10, 2006, 03:54:10 PM
Those people in ALE, who are supposed to be professionals, can see what we can see, and I am sure a whole lot more. Were this case put before a jury in the US, I imagine with the circumstancial evidence alone, the 3 would be found guilty on some count, since it sounds to me like there are several to chose from. Abduction, sexual assault, murder, desecration of a body (assuming it was buried and moved again).

As attached as that group of punks are, I am sure there is a sizable group who knows what happened that night and were either directly involved or know the facts. Surely there is one individual with a heart and goodness will prevail and justice will be served. That's my prayer at least.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: robots on August 10, 2006, 03:54:29 PM
either GRETA is the WORLDS biggest DUMBASS

or she was was PLAYING GAMES hoping to get the VAN DER SLUGS to do another interview with her



personally, im going with the worlds BIGGEST DUMBASS  :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Frijole on August 10, 2006, 03:54:46 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "Frijole"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
There is a lot of hard work being put into this...

But all the info we are privy to, has been viewed by the "investigators" in this case.  

I don't think it's ever been a matter that the clues were not there, or the evidence, but that it was ignored or discarded.

I hiope I am  wrong but I think the next big Fireworks in this case will be that it is closed.


Maybe... but I still have hope that eventually there will be justice


I agree.  It is awfully hard to this case to be closed and shoved under the rug  when these documents are all out there for the world to see.  It is so obviously a cover up.

We need for this info to get organized into obvious discrepancies to prove the cover up and get it beyond the world of blogs and into the mass media so that there is no choice but for action to be taken.  JMHO


Well Nancy Grace is going to have something on regarding the case on Friday... maybe we should do an email campaign - start with her.


Great idea.  We could all email her, OR we could assemble all of the obvious major discrepancies we've come up with (and continue to come up with) in a single document to make her job of reporting easier.  Thoughts monkeys?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: terryd270 on August 10, 2006, 03:55:23 PM
Is the reason we are getting this information is because Aruba closed the investigation?   Have we had this information for a long time?  I do believe that this blog has help find information that wouldn't of been seen even by good investigators..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: robots on August 10, 2006, 03:55:27 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
How I read the cell phone record is that DEEPAK calls JORAN at around 7:25pm on May 30th from the Cyberzone.  Also, that Joran said he was in the area of the Radisson/Wyndham but the cell tower near the Lighthouse was picked up.  (I think :wink: )


JACKPOT  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: sharon on August 10, 2006, 03:56:44 PM
Quote from: "Frijole"

Hmmm.... so this is what he and Deepak were doing prior to Beth's arrival.... Very interesting... Trying to find something?  hide something?  bury something?


Deepak was at work Frijole.

This would be Joran and.....

Satish
Paulus
Guido
Koen
.
.
.
. and the beat goes on...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: robots on August 10, 2006, 03:56:55 PM
i think PAULUS the SQAULUS

said

sure, they DID IT, and if you want to KEEP IT UP , i will spill BEANS on everything ROTTEN in this CRAZY STUPID COUNTRY  :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on August 10, 2006, 03:59:18 PM
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "klaasend"
How I read the cell phone record is that DEEPAK calls JORAN at around 7:25pm on May 30th from the Cyberzone.  Also, that Joran said he was in the area of the Radisson/Wyndham but the cell tower near the Lighthouse was picked up.  (I think :wink: )


JACKPOT  :D


The question is..if Joran was up near the Lighthouse around 7:25pm on May 30th..what was he doing there?  Also, who was he with?  Was he with Satish in Deepak's car or was someone else driving him around like Guido?

Was he disposing of evidence?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Frijole on August 10, 2006, 03:59:46 PM
Quote from: "sharon"
Quote from: "Frijole"

Hmmm.... so this is what he and Deepak were doing prior to Beth's arrival.... Very interesting... Trying to find something?  hide something?  bury something?


Deepak was at work Frijole.

This would be Joran and.....

Satish
Paulus
Guido
Koen
.
.
.
. and the beat goes on...


Yeah - sorry, I jumped the gun... had read that.  You are right - he must have been with some of the other Pimps or maybe showing Daddy Dearest where he played the night before.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Frijole on August 10, 2006, 04:00:48 PM
Quote from: "robots"
i think PAULUS the SQAULUS

said

sure, they DID IT, and if you want to KEEP IT UP , i will spill BEANS on everything ROTTEN in this CRAZY STUPID COUNTRY  :twisted:


I think you may be right.  Nothing else explains the involvement of so many to cover up for a couple of delinquent teenagers.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: robots on August 10, 2006, 04:01:14 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "klaasend"
How I read the cell phone record is that DEEPAK calls JORAN at around 7:25pm on May 30th from the Cyberzone.  Also, that Joran said he was in the area of the Radisson/Wyndham but the cell tower near the Lighthouse was picked up.  (I think :wink: )


JACKPOT  :D


The question is..if Joran was up near the Lighthouse around 7:25pm on May 30th..what was he doing there?  Also, who was he with?  Was he with Satish in Deepak's car or was someone else driving him around like Guido?

Was he disposing of evidence?



walked barefoot by himself  :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: robots on August 10, 2006, 04:01:56 PM
Quote from: "Frijole"
Quote from: "robots"
i think PAULUS the SQAULUS

said

sure, they DID IT, and if you want to KEEP IT UP , i will spill BEANS on everything ROTTEN in this CRAZY STUPID COUNTRY  :twisted:


I think you may be right.  Nothing else explains the involvement of so many to cover up for a couple of delinquent teenagers.


had to be  :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Frijole on August 10, 2006, 04:01:59 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "klaasend"
How I read the cell phone record is that DEEPAK calls JORAN at around 7:25pm on May 30th from the Cyberzone.  Also, that Joran said he was in the area of the Radisson/Wyndham but the cell tower near the Lighthouse was picked up.  (I think :wink: )


JACKPOT  :D


The question is..if Joran was up near the Lighthouse around 7:25pm on May 30th..what was he doing there?  Also, who was he with?  Was he with Satish in Deepak's car or was someone else driving him around like Guido?

Was he disposing of evidence?


They always return to the scene of the crime they say.  (or to where the body is/was)  I'm thinking the rock area.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on August 10, 2006, 04:02:46 PM
My suggestion would be to bypass Greta, Nancy, and send this information that all of you are working so very hard to compile and send it to an Investigator.  Mark Furhman, or someone who has investigative background, but enough noteriety to be able to make things happen.

I don't think the Moxley murder would have ever been solved if not for Mark Furhman.

MSM has their own agenda....

It's all about ratings, and sensationalism....

JMHO


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: terryd270 on August 10, 2006, 04:04:07 PM
I can't get my focus off of Joran,  its the Dutch that protect the Dutch and not Satish and Deepak.. Heck they got rid of Dompig because he was saying things about the White Dutch kids and thats why he is gone.. Its Joran and the others might of helped in someway or other but the one that caused her death is Joran...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: robots on August 10, 2006, 04:04:55 PM
Quote from: "terryd270"
I can't get my focus off of Joran,  its the Dutch that protect the Dutch and not Satish and Deepak.. Heck they got rid of Dompig because he was saying things about the White Dutch kids and thats why he is gone.. Its Joran and the others might of helped in someway or other but the one that caused her death is Joran...


i agree


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: terryd270 on August 10, 2006, 04:08:51 PM
Thinks like the PIMPS.. If you wanted someone to proxy for you, would you rely on Satish and Deepak or Joran(Freddy, Sandor, Koen, etc..)..

Joran was know as someone that can get his way and used that to get people to do what he wants..  I'm pretty sure that Satish or Deepak do not have that power.. They looked like losers and they are losers, they are not leaders..  You are giving these two, way too much credit..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: mrs. red on August 10, 2006, 04:09:36 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
My suggestion would be to bypass Greta, Nancy, and send this information that all of you are working so very hard to compile and send it to an Investigator.  Mark Furhman, or someone who has investigative background, but enough noteriety to be able to make things happen.

I don't think the Moxley murder would have ever been solved if not for Mark Furhman.

MSM has their own agenda....

It's all about ratings, and sensationalism....

JMHO


You could be on to something there! We have seen time and time again that MSM has an agenda....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: igsigs on August 10, 2006, 04:10:21 PM
Cell Phone Info - thanks Klaas

VDStraaten..."Looking at the resulation of the measuring, it is therefore possible that suspect Joran van der Sloot reversed possibly and nevertheless drove by the Marriott to Wyndham and cell-id's were registered."

Is VDStraaten trying to excuse Joran's lie with this statement?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: nonesuche on August 10, 2006, 04:11:55 PM
Hi everyone-

Just popping in during mr none's nap, I think it's a great idea Jacq has had. If typing skills are necessary I can do some typing for a summary, I know Klaas is doing regular work this week. So just email me if I can help.

Hope all are having a good day.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on August 10, 2006, 04:12:21 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
My suggestion would be to bypass Greta, Nancy, and send this information that all of you are working so very hard to compile and send it to an Investigator.  Mark Furhman, or someone who has investigative background, but enough noteriety to be able to make things happen.

I don't think the Moxley murder would have ever been solved if not for Mark Furhman.

MSM has their own agenda....

It's all about ratings, and sensationalism....

JMHO


You could be on to something there! We have seen time and time again that MSM has an agenda....


Yes, and I think of all the times I have gotten suckered in with their claims of Breaking news crap...and Ohhhh you won't want to miss this bull.

When it is nothing more than a rehash.

Time to travel another road....

And maybe one less publicized...

At night......They Hit us.....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: sharon on August 10, 2006, 04:12:28 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Cell Phone Info - thanks Klaas

VDStraaten..."Looking at the resulation of the measuring, it is therefore possible that suspect Joran van der Sloot reversed possibly and nevertheless drove by the Marriott to Wyndham and cell-id's were registered."

Is VDStraaten trying to excuse Joran's lie with this statement?


I think this is VDStraaten version of 'reasonable doubt'

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Sue on August 10, 2006, 04:13:19 PM
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "klaasend"
How I read the cell phone record is that DEEPAK calls JORAN at around 7:25pm on May 30th from the Cyberzone.  Also, that Joran said he was in the area of the Radisson/Wyndham but the cell tower near the Lighthouse was picked up.  (I think :wink: )


JACKPOT  :D


The question is..if Joran was up near the Lighthouse around 7:25pm on May 30th..what was he doing there?  Also, who was he with?  Was he with Satish in Deepak's car or was someone else driving him around like Guido?

Was he disposing of evidence?



walked barefoot by himself  :twisted:


trying to find his missing shoes and the condom that broke


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: nonesuche on August 10, 2006, 04:14:24 PM
yes and straaten also lives next door to one of our former aruban posters, so I have often wondered how much of what we discovered he was given a heads-up on?

igsigs, after reading over these statements, no doubt in my mind that stratten led this cover-up for the ALE.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: terryd270 on August 10, 2006, 04:14:28 PM
When we do find the answers, I don't think they will be that complicated.. I keep pointing my finger at Joran..  If you look at Joran, he looks to some here like an all American kid and the Kalpoe's look seedy, low class, and even their Mother says that all people lie.. Well they were easily gotten to in the beginning with Greta over at the Kalpoe's talking to her and Deepak going to Skeeter thinking he was going on the Dr. Phil and making a lot of money.. These are not rocket scientist, they are most likely slow learners trying to be accepted by these rich Dutch kids that run the island..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on August 10, 2006, 04:15:40 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Cell Phone Info - thanks Klaas

VDStraaten..."Looking at the resulation of the measuring, it is therefore possible that suspect Joran van der Sloot reversed possibly and nevertheless drove by the Marriott to Wyndham and cell-id's were registered."

Is VDStraaten trying to excuse Joran's lie with this statement?


Sure reads that way to me.  Also, now that I think about it, isn't it confirmed that Joran was with Guido around 7pm on May 30th?  So it would be Guido driving Joran around.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on August 10, 2006, 04:17:15 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
yes and straaten also lives next door to one of our former aruban posters, so I have often wondered how much of what we discovered he was given a heads-up on?

igsigs, after reading over these statements, no doubt in my mind that stratten led this cover-up for the ALE.


Hey None....Glad to see you here....while I am here.... :lol:

But now I'm leaving for the day....

See you all later...

I too, would love to help out with any typing that needs to be done...

Just lemme know.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on August 10, 2006, 04:17:43 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Hi everyone-

Just popping in during mr none's nap, I think it's a great idea Jacq has had. If typing skills are necessary I can do some typing for a summary, I know Klaas is doing regular work this week. So just email me if I can help.

Hope all are having a good day.


I do agree, that is a great idea to send information to Mark Furman.  I have never the less, sent the information to Nancy Grace since she will be covering the case tomorrow night.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: sharon on August 10, 2006, 04:18:42 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
yes and straaten also lives next door to one of our former aruban posters, so I have often wondered how much of what we discovered he was given a heads-up on?

igsigs, after reading over these statements, no doubt in my mind that stratten led this cover-up for the ALE.


I remember one of our initial Aruba posters SWEARING that VenderStraaten was an 'up and up' guy.

I think she even said that 'he was so honest, he would arrest his own mother if he had to'.

I don't think the poster was lieing -- I think she really believed it.

And she was wrong.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: nonesuche on August 10, 2006, 04:20:45 PM
Jacq, good to see you too HUGS

Klaas, as always you're all over it, thanks!

sharon, you are correct and that poster is young and naive as well.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 10, 2006, 04:22:00 PM
Thank you to all involved in getting this info out there!! BFN and SM are giving RU some major palpatations......HAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!
Welcome to Best Smileys  
For Message Boards (Copy & Paste) below text Graphic That Will Show
(http://bestsmileys.com/surprised/1.gif)
I LOVE IT!! KEEP IT COMING!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: nomad on August 10, 2006, 04:24:09 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "igsigs"
Cell Phone Info - thanks Klaas

VDStraaten..."Looking at the resulation of the measuring, it is therefore possible that suspect Joran van der Sloot reversed possibly and nevertheless drove by the Marriott to Wyndham and cell-id's were registered."

Is VDStraaten trying to excuse Joran's lie with this statement?


Sure reads that way to me.  Also, now that I think about it, isn't it confirmed that Joran was with Guido around 7pm on May 30th?  So it would be Guido driving Joran around.


Am going by memory, but didn't Jossy in his Dana interview say Joran was with Guido and Dos Santos the entire evening?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Frijole on August 10, 2006, 04:24:31 PM
If I recall, Joran was supposed to be playing tennis with Guido and then they went to the casino that night... so I'm thinking Guido was with Joran.  I also think we now know why he fled the island within a few days.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: igsigs on August 10, 2006, 04:24:47 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "igsigs"
Cell Phone Info - thanks Klaas

VDStraaten..."Looking at the resulation of the measuring, it is therefore possible that suspect Joran van der Sloot reversed possibly and nevertheless drove by the Marriott to Wyndham and cell-id's were registered."

Is VDStraaten trying to excuse Joran's lie with this statement?


Sure reads that way to me.  Also, now that I think about it, isn't it confirmed that Joran was with Guido around 7pm on May 30th?  So it would be Guido driving Joran around.

I think you're right. We could ask Glenda or Scoop about it. Seems they have been mighty quite since the docs have been released, though. 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Frijole on August 10, 2006, 04:25:32 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Cell Phone Info - thanks Klaas

VDStraaten..."Looking at the resulation of the measuring, it is therefore possible that suspect Joran van der Sloot reversed possibly and nevertheless drove by the Marriott to Wyndham and cell-id's were registered."

Is VDStraaten trying to excuse Joran's lie with this statement?


That is my take.  We need Metro!!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Frijole on August 10, 2006, 04:26:39 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
My suggestion would be to bypass Greta, Nancy, and send this information that all of you are working so very hard to compile and send it to an Investigator.  Mark Furhman, or someone who has investigative background, but enough noteriety to be able to make things happen.

I don't think the Moxley murder would have ever been solved if not for Mark Furhman.

MSM has their own agenda....

It's all about ratings, and sensationalism....

JMHO


You could be on to something there! We have seen time and time again that MSM has an agenda....


Yes, and I think of all the times I have gotten suckered in with their claims of Breaking news crap...and Ohhhh you won't want to miss this bull.

When it is nothing more than a rehash.

Time to travel another road....

And maybe one less publicized...

At night......They Hit us.....


You are right.. and not only misleading but they are in the middle of a legitimate scoop and pause for 10 minutes of commercials and then don't pick up where they left off... disgusting.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: terryd270 on August 10, 2006, 04:26:58 PM
I wouldn't be surprised that Paulus, Anita and others in power had nightly meetings on the case and how they could spend it.. They spoon fed Joran with information that he needed to stay away from and point the fingers at the Kalpoe's..  I guess my problem is that I don't think the Kalpoe's are very smart and that if it was them, they would of already been convicted..  They are greedy but I don't think they are smart..  The Sloots are smart but not too greedy, I think they do things like a chess match and some of the posting and information we get are from that group..  They know how to give misinformation..  It was Joran that said hey you guys we just need to say we dropped that girl off at the HI and keep to our stories..  Yes Deepak being STUPID adds the details about the securities guards because he wants to be accepted as one of Joran's friends and not just a taxi ride..  Well hopefully we will see the answers to this but it seems the biggest lies have been from Joran and thats why he was in jail two more months than Deepak and Satish.. I'm sure they checked the phone calls and computer records of these two and they only found small errors where with Joran they couldn't find any truth..

Sad to say I guess I feel that if there is any truth its in between the lies of the Kalpoes vs no truth and all lies of Joran..  "He moved her underware to the side and stuck in his index finger, and then another finger".. But on the beach she told him that she was a good french kisser, I would assume kissing would come first before the other part..  If you can just picture Joran as I describe him that some felt I was being mean spirited, I think you will see that he is exactly like I describe his appearance..  He gets away with his lies because people only see the facade he had on the outside and not what he really looks like (inside and outside)..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Frijole on August 10, 2006, 04:27:55 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
yes and straaten also lives next door to one of our former aruban posters, so I have often wondered how much of what we discovered he was given a heads-up on?

igsigs, after reading over these statements, no doubt in my mind that stratten led this cover-up for the ALE.


Wow!!!  I didn't know that... I always wondered what motivated some of the Arubans to stick with the case... that would totally make sense.  I am sick to my stomach but I believe it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Anna on August 10, 2006, 04:29:18 PM
.
Yes, I was routinely brutalized if I even mentioned or asked if vStraaten had a son in this age group and driven back to RWV repeatedly.  That poster just hated me!   8)

And we had another poster from Aruba who said the Michael Posner in Aruba was a DIFFERENT one, not the bad Michael Posner of Chicago Mob but a nice one born right there on the island, too.  8) Sure he was--not!

But I think in both instances they possibly really believed that and only saw the good in people who were their neighbors or fellow-islanders.  I think it is difficult for some to see evil in those they know even casually.

I have a dear friend I cannot even discuss high profile crimes with because in every instance the suspects just have to be innocent according to her because she cannot envision that person doing such a thing as the crime they are accused of was.  And this is true for me to some extent.  It is hard to look at a 17 year old kid and think him capable of this but SOMEBODY sure made Natalee and even her remains disappear and he is the prime candidate.  Nothing alters or deters from that logical conclusion but to just look as many criminals, much as I might dislike them, I can't envision their actual commission of the crime.  I think some just think if they can't imagine it, it must not have been possible that it happened.

 :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: robots on August 10, 2006, 04:32:21 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "igsigs"
Cell Phone Info - thanks Klaas

VDStraaten..."Looking at the resulation of the measuring, it is therefore possible that suspect Joran van der Sloot reversed possibly and nevertheless drove by the Marriott to Wyndham and cell-id's were registered."

Is VDStraaten trying to excuse Joran's lie with this statement?


Sure reads that way to me.  Also, now that I think about it, isn't it confirmed that Joran was with Guido around 7pm on May 30th?  So it would be Guido driving Joran around.

I think you're right. We could ask Glenda or Scoop about it. Seems they have been mighty quite since the docs have been released, though. 8)



very quiet


kind of refreshing

they must be related to JORAN

they are great LIARS  :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: terryd270 on August 10, 2006, 04:34:02 PM
Its kinda funny but with all this information that is coming out in such a short time, I' getting overloaded..  I need a break, take care..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Anna on August 10, 2006, 04:41:43 PM
.
But wouldn't this cell phone record sort of support Joran saying he walked from the RacquetClub to the Radisson/Wyndham area?  After the alleged tennis lesson or whatever he was doing there?

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on August 10, 2006, 04:42:55 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
.
But wouldn't this cell phone record sort of support Joran saying he walked from the RacquetClub to the Radisson/Wyndham area?  After the alleged tennis lesson or whatever he was doing there?

.


Maybe that part, but Joran doesn't mention anything about being in the area of the Lighthouse even though the cell tower in that area picked up a call.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Freebird on August 10, 2006, 04:43:33 PM
I was in the wrong thread wondering why no one was around.  

I am stunned and sickened.  I'm sure you've all discussed this and I apologize for being repetitive but if someone could just confirm if I'm reading this correctly.

At 7:25 p on the 30th Joran was travelling toward the lighthouse over a period of 2.5 minutes, although in his declaration he had stated that he was headed in the opposite direction toward the Wyndham casino?  Please, anyone.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on August 10, 2006, 04:44:58 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Jacq, good to see you too HUGS

Klaas, as always you're all over it, thanks!

sharon, you are correct and that poster is young and naive as well.


Hi Sweetie!  How are ya holding up?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on August 10, 2006, 04:46:59 PM
Quote from: "Freebird"
I was in the wrong thread wondering why no one was around.  

I am stunned and sickened.  I'm sure you've all discussed this and I apologize for being repetitive but if someone could just confirm if I'm reading this correctly.

At 7:25 p on the 30th Joran was travelling toward the lighthouse over a period of 2.5 minutes, although in his declaration he had stated that he was headed in the opposite direction toward the Wyndham casino?  Please, anyone.


That's how it reads to me Freebird.  Keeping in mind that this is a rough translation though.  I'm sure if the translation is way off we will hear about it but I don't think it is.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Freebird on August 10, 2006, 04:48:27 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Freebird"
I was in the wrong thread wondering why no one was around.  

I am stunned and sickened.  I'm sure you've all discussed this and I apologize for being repetitive but if someone could just confirm if I'm reading this correctly.

At 7:25 p on the 30th Joran was travelling toward the lighthouse over a period of 2.5 minutes, although in his declaration he had stated that he was headed in the opposite direction toward the Wyndham casino?  Please, anyone.


That's how it reads to me Freebird.  Keeping in mind that this is a rough translation though.  I'm sure if the translation is way off we will hear about it but I don't think it is.


Thank you klaas.  I am speechless although many thoughts are flying through my mind.


Guido, Andre?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Frijole on August 10, 2006, 04:49:44 PM
Quote from: "Freebird"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Freebird"
I was in the wrong thread wondering why no one was around.  

I am stunned and sickened.  I'm sure you've all discussed this and I apologize for being repetitive but if someone could just confirm if I'm reading this correctly.

At 7:25 p on the 30th Joran was travelling toward the lighthouse over a period of 2.5 minutes, although in his declaration he had stated that he was headed in the opposite direction toward the Wyndham casino?  Please, anyone.


That's how it reads to me Freebird.  Keeping in mind that this is a rough translation though.  I'm sure if the translation is way off we will hear about it but I don't think it is.


Thank you klaas.  I am speechless although many thoughts are flying through my mind.


Guido, Andre?


I say Guido - don't know about Andre.  And Guido has that infamous white car that we heard they were looking for... I think Guido has some knowledge.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on August 10, 2006, 04:50:48 PM
Shizaru's timeline based on statements for May 30th:

Below is the timeline for late 5/30 based on statements so far. Joran does not say he is driving anywhere from 7:00-8:00, he says he is walking.

The notable discrepancy in the statements here is that Deepak says when he called Joran at 6:00 Joran told him he was at the Wyndham with Guido, but Joran says he was at the RC at that time):


5:00 pm: Paulus drops Joran off at Raquet Club (J 6/14)

5:00-7:00 pm: At Raquet Club, Joran talks to Koen, has tennis lesson (J 6/14)

6:00 pm: Deepak calls Joran to ask him how he is. Joran says he is with Guido Wever in the casino at the Wyndham. Deepak says he will call him back (D 6/11, 6/16)

7:00 pm: Joran calls Paulus asking if he can go to the casino, Paulus says yes. Joran calls Andre and Guido Wever (6/14)

7:15 pm: Joran leaves on foot for the Wyndham Hotel. On the way he stops at the Marriott beach to look for his shoes (J 6/14)

7:45: Joran arrives at Aruba Grant Hotel & Casino (J 6/14)

8:00 pm: Joran walks to Wyndham, meets Andre there (J 6/14)

8:15 pm: Joran begins playing poker at Wyndham casino (J 6 /14)

10:30: Guido arrives at Wyndham. Joran leaves with Guido and drives to the Aruba grant to cash in chips he had won earlier. Guido and Joran play blackjack at Grant (J 6/14)

11:00 pm: Before leaving work Deepak calls Joran again, Joran tells him he as at the Radisson, Deepak says he will come there (D 6/13)

11:15 pm-12:00 am: Satish picks up Deepak from work. Deepak takes Satish home because he has school the next day and his mother is angry that they stayed out late the previous night and Satish hadn't gone to school. When they get home Deepak tells Satish he is going to the casino with Joran. Satish goes to sleep (D 6/11, S 6/11)

11:15: Guido and Joran arrive at Radisson Casino. Andre calls to ask where Joran is, and says he will come there (J 6/14)

Complete constantly updated statement timeline here:
http://blogsfornatalee.com/forums/index.php?topic=4534.0


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on August 10, 2006, 04:51:57 PM
Quote from: "Frijole"
Quote from: "Freebird"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Freebird"
I was in the wrong thread wondering why no one was around.  

I am stunned and sickened.  I'm sure you've all discussed this and I apologize for being repetitive but if someone could just confirm if I'm reading this correctly.

At 7:25 p on the 30th Joran was travelling toward the lighthouse over a period of 2.5 minutes, although in his declaration he had stated that he was headed in the opposite direction toward the Wyndham casino?  Please, anyone.


That's how it reads to me Freebird.  Keeping in mind that this is a rough translation though.  I'm sure if the translation is way off we will hear about it but I don't think it is.


Thank you klaas.  I am speechless although many thoughts are flying through my mind.


Guido, Andre?


I say Guido - don't know about Andre.  And Guido has that infamous white car that we heard they were looking for... I think Guido has some knowledge.


Andre SANTOS (is he nicknamed Dos Santos?)
(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/AndreSantos2.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Anna on August 10, 2006, 04:52:32 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Anna"
.
But wouldn't this cell phone record sort of support Joran saying he walked from the RacquetClub to the Radisson/Wyndham area?  After the alleged tennis lesson or whatever he was doing there?

.


Maybe that part, but Joran doesn't mention anything about being in the area of the Lighthouse even though the cell tower in that area picked up a call.


Looking at the map again, it would appear the RacquetClub and the Lighthouse are too far apart for this just to be phone overlap??  He would have to be closer to the lighthouse than the club for that to happen?

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on August 10, 2006, 04:53:36 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Anna"
.
But wouldn't this cell phone record sort of support Joran saying he walked from the RacquetClub to the Radisson/Wyndham area?  After the alleged tennis lesson or whatever he was doing there?

.


Maybe that part, but Joran doesn't mention anything about being in the area of the Lighthouse even though the cell tower in that area picked up a call.


Looking at the map again, it would appear the RacquetClub and the Lighthouse are too far apart for this just to be phone overlap??  He would have to be closer to the lighthouse than the club for that to happen?

.


I think that's why we need Atlmetroguy, he can be of help with the Cell records.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on August 10, 2006, 04:54:22 PM
Need to get back to work.  I back to lurking again  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Freebird on August 10, 2006, 04:55:45 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Anna"
.
But wouldn't this cell phone record sort of support Joran saying he walked from the RacquetClub to the Radisson/Wyndham area?  After the alleged tennis lesson or whatever he was doing there?

.


Maybe that part, but Joran doesn't mention anything about being in the area of the Lighthouse even though the cell tower in that area picked up a call.


Looking at the map again, it would appear the RacquetClub and the Lighthouse are too far apart for this just to be phone overlap??  He would have to be closer to the lighthouse than the club for that to happen?

.


I think that's why we need Atlmetroguy, he can be of help with the Cell records.



I think it speaks for itself.  Tell you what, I am literally sick knowing the frustration Beth and Dave must have felt for so long, knowing this (and much more,no doubt) without any resolution.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Freebird on August 10, 2006, 04:57:17 PM
I have to get back to work as well but I will definitely be back later.  So many thoughts right now that I cant even organize them all in my mind.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: blah on August 10, 2006, 04:57:37 PM
WTF is this????


"When I got home I took a shower. After showering I had turned on my TV and airco. I had installed my Multi-Media that I was going to take to school the next day. I had also gone into the living room to look for something to drink. I had turned on my computer. I had signed in to "MSN-MESSENGER". None of the people I regularly chat with were "on-line". It is possible I sent Deepak a message to come "on-line". I say this because Deepak told me during the confrontation that I sent him a message. But I am not sure about that. I went to sleep after that. "


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Spock on August 10, 2006, 05:03:31 PM
Quote from: "Freebird"
At 7:25 p on the 30th Joran was travelling toward the lighthouse over a period of 2.5 minutes, although in his declaration he had stated that he was headed in the opposite direction toward the Wyndham casino?  Please, anyone.


My "read" is that after 2.28 minutes the call was dropped by the casino tower and taken up by the lighthouse tower. A clear indication that Joran was headed away from the hotel-casino area and towards the Arashi beach-lighthouse area. It also appears (from other sources) Guido may have been driving.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Anna on August 10, 2006, 05:22:57 PM
.
But we do not know if Deepak knows this and is in on it or if Joran has decided to cut him out of the loop and only work with Guido or others?  That might be necessary if he was thinking of leaving Deepak or Satish holding the bag for everything?

Trying to read reason into this. . . . .getting headache instead.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Ono on August 10, 2006, 05:26:52 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "klaasend"
How I read the cell phone record is that DEEPAK calls JORAN at around 7:25pm on May 30th from the Cyberzone.  Also, that Joran said he was in the area of the Radisson/Wyndham but the cell tower near the Lighthouse was picked up.  (I think :wink: )


JACKPOT  :D


The question is..if Joran was up near the Lighthouse around 7:25pm on May 30th..what was he doing there?  Also, who was he with?  Was he with Satish in Deepak's car or was someone else driving him around like Guido?

Was he disposing of evidence?


Was it the time ...." he almost fell in the water and got sand on his shorts & feet " ????????


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: sharon on August 10, 2006, 05:27:38 PM
Quote from: "Spock"
Quote from: "Freebird"
At 7:25 p on the 30th Joran was travelling toward the lighthouse over a period of 2.5 minutes, although in his declaration he had stated that he was headed in the opposite direction toward the Wyndham casino?  Please, anyone.


My "read" is that after 2.28 minutes the call was dropped by the casino tower and taken up by the lighthouse tower. A clear indication that Joran was headed away from the hotel-casino area and towards the Arashi beach-lighthouse area. It also appears (from other sources) Guido may have been driving.


That's interesting Spock.

I thought his alibi about playing tennis had already been busted.

And I remember Beth remarking that she had seen the Wyndham tapes and Joran was NOT on them.

So I wonder what he was doing in the vicinity of the fisherman's huts, racquet club and pond .....on his way to the Lighthouse :?:

Who or what did they have to pick up first :?:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Ono on August 10, 2006, 05:30:01 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Cell Phone Info - thanks Klaas

VDStraaten..."Looking at the resulation of the measuring, it is therefore possible that suspect Joran van der Sloot reversed possibly and nevertheless drove by the Marriott to Wyndham and cell-id's were registered."

Is VDStraaten trying to excuse Joran's lie with this statement?


YES.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Anna on August 10, 2006, 05:31:38 PM
.
Klaas,
Now that makes sense, Joran and Satish getting sand in the car. . . .

Going to go think about all this a bit and see if I can focus better after that.

 :o It's all running together.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on August 10, 2006, 05:33:03 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"


The question is..if Joran was up near the Lighthouse around 7:25pm on May 30th..what was he doing there?  Also, who was he with?  Was he with Satish in Deepak's car or was someone else driving him around like Guido?

Was he disposing of evidence?


Maybe that is where & when the sand got in Deepak's car.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Ono on August 10, 2006, 05:34:21 PM
Quote from: "terryd270"
When we do find the answers, I don't think they will be that complicated.. I keep pointing my finger at Joran..  If you look at Joran, he looks to some here like an all American kid and the Kalpoe's look seedy, low class, and even their Mother says that all people lie.. Well they were easily gotten to in the beginning with Greta over at the Kalpoe's talking to her and Deepak going to Skeeter thinking he was going on the Dr. Phil and making a lot of money.. These are not rocket scientist, they are most likely slow learners trying to be accepted by these rich Dutch kids that run the island..


I still think for the Kalpoes, it was about monies Joran paid them...not social friendship.  Joran's group would never accept the Kalpoes on a social level, and they knew it..It was a strictly business relationship in my opinion.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: sharon on August 10, 2006, 05:39:36 PM
Isn't Koen's house by the Lighthouse.

If Joran was at Koen's house -- rather than the lighthouse -- would the the same cell tower pick up the call?

Anyone know?

Koens' house to get the boat -- and then onwards to where Joran gets his clothes wet and sandy?


.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on August 10, 2006, 05:42:41 PM
Quote from: "sharon"
Isn't Koen's house by the Lighthouse.

If Joran was at Koen's house -- rather than the lighthouse -- would the the same cell tower pick up the call?

Anyone know?

Koens' house to get the boat -- and then onwards to where Joran gets his clothes wet and sandy?


.


(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/canashito7.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Ono on August 10, 2006, 05:44:25 PM
Quote from: "sharon"
Quote from: "Spock"
Quote from: "Freebird"
At 7:25 p on the 30th Joran was travelling toward the lighthouse over a period of 2.5 minutes, although in his declaration he had stated that he was headed in the opposite direction toward the Wyndham casino?  Please, anyone.


My "read" is that after 2.28 minutes the call was dropped by the casino tower and taken up by the lighthouse tower. A clear indication that Joran was headed away from the hotel-casino area and towards the Arashi beach-lighthouse area. It also appears (from other sources) Guido may have been driving.


That's interesting Spock.

I thought his alibi about playing tennis had already been busted.

And I remember Beth remarking that she had seen the Wyndham tapes and Joran was NOT on them.

So I wonder what he was doing in the vicinity of the fisherman's huts, racquet club and pond .....on his way to the Lighthouse :?:

Who or what did they have to pick up first :?:


I thought I remembered something negative about the tennis lessons also....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: sharon on August 10, 2006, 06:00:23 PM
Thanks Klaas!

I thought Koen's house was closer to the Lighthouse. I don't know enough about cell towers to know what they would show about a call from Koen's.

I'm sure we have some monkeys that will know.

I have to say...everytime I see that map, and I look at the placement of the stars...all I can think of is 'one straight line to the house of rave'.
 :)



.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Spock on August 10, 2006, 06:02:06 PM
[quote="sharon
I thought his alibi about playing tennis had already been busted.
quote]

Joran first claimed to have been playing tennis with Koen at the Racquet Club that afternoon but it was found to be a lie. Koen was asked to come in and explain but refused to give a statement. His father gave a statement in his place. The assistant prosecutor at the time (Flanagan) resigned because they would not question/arrest Koen directly.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Freebird on August 10, 2006, 06:09:22 PM
Quote from: "Spock"
Quote from: "sharon"

I thought his alibi about playing tennis had already been busted.


Joran first claimed to have been playing tennis with Koen at the Racquet Club that afternoon but it was found to be a lie. Koen was asked to come in and explain but refused to give a statement. His father gave a statement in his place. The assistant prosecutor at the time (Flanagan) resigned because they would not question/arrest Koen directly.


Anybody ever hear anything about Steve Cohen being a part of Joran's tennis alibi?  Yes, Steve Cohen, AHTA guy.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: sharon on August 10, 2006, 06:11:55 PM
Quote from: "Spock"
[quote="sharon
I thought his alibi about playing tennis had already been busted.
quote]

Joran first claimed to have been playing tennis with Koen at the Racquet Club that afternoon but it was found to be a lie. Koen was asked to come in and explain but refused to give a statement. His father gave a statement in his place. The assistant prosecutor at the time (Flanagan) resigned because they would not question/arrest Koen directly.



That's what I remember Spock. Dave said Koen looked ready to cave -- yet they allowed his father to refuse to bring Koen in for questioning.


Now I need to go re-read the statements to see who Joran says he was playing tennis with....but I better wait until ALL the statements are in. You can never tell how many times Joran will change his story.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: sharon on August 10, 2006, 06:14:02 PM
Quote from: "Freebird"

Anybody ever hear anything about Steve Cohen being a part of Joran's tennis alibi?  Yes, Steve Cohen, AHTA guy.


What do you mean Freebird?

That Joran played tennis with Steve Cohen?

Or that Steve Cohen was the source for Joran's alibi?

I do remember Steve saying that Joran had played tennis. So if not a source -- he was certainly a 'spreader' of the mis-information.


.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on August 10, 2006, 06:16:10 PM
Rammsteins correction of the bottom part of our rough translation:

At the bottom of his second page van der Straten writes:

Looking at the results of the measurements, it is possible that the suspect Joran van der Sloot was indeed walking from the Marriot to the Wyndham and that this could still have resulted in reverse order picking up/registering of the cell-phone ID's.

Then Ramm adds:

In dutch it says that even though it looks like he was walking from the Wyndham towards the Marriot when first looking at the mobile-phone ID records, actual measurements have shown that Joran could have been walking (as he was saying) from the Marriot towards the Wyndham and still get the results that the ID records have shown.

In other words, Joran could have just as easily been telling the truth about walking from the Marriot to the Wyndham, the phone ID-records in this are not conclusive according to the measurements.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: sharon on August 10, 2006, 06:25:28 PM
Sheeesh!

In terms of 'reading comprehension' they are both saying the same damn thing.

Bottom line....'it is possible'....'could have shown'

Which ALSO means that Joran possibly could be lieing as well.

What are the odds of Joran lieing?

Or does my statement need to be re-translated as well :roll:

THANK YOU KLAAS AND SCARED MONKEYS FOR GETTING US THE ROUGH TRANSLATIONS AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on August 10, 2006, 06:31:31 PM
Hello everyone!  :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on August 10, 2006, 06:36:08 PM
Quote from: "sharon"
Sheeesh!

In terms of 'reading comprehension' they are both saying the same damn thing.

Bottom line....'it is possible'....'could have shown'

Which ALSO means that Joran possibly could be lieing as well.

What are the odds of Joran lieing?

Or does my statement need to be re-translated as well :roll:

THANK YOU KLAAS AND SCARED MONKEYS FOR GETTING US THE ROUGH TRANSLATIONS AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.


My entire problem with Van Der Stratten's statement at the bottom of the report is that he is such close friends with the VDS family.  Of course he's going to make an excuse for it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: terryd270 on August 10, 2006, 06:37:11 PM
Hi anidac, Anna, Dana, Leslie, Nut44x4, Rooscrew, thirdstrike!  I guess we wanted some news and now we are getting it..  With this latest scared of bombing of our airplanes and the news that we are getting from the island, I would think they might be bankrupt before they can pay Paulus off..  Is Joran still over in Aruba?  Is John Q. Kelly over in Aruba?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: terryd270 on August 10, 2006, 06:38:59 PM
Is there anything on the stations about the case besides N.G tomorrow night.. Do we know if its something new or just a rehash of a prior program of her's?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: terryd270 on August 10, 2006, 06:40:28 PM
I'm curious but some of the members of the PIMPS are here in Florida if I heard right, well can't the FBI bring them in for an interview?  Just curious..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on August 10, 2006, 06:41:01 PM
Quote from: "terryd270"
Is there anything on the stations about the case besides N.G tomorrow night.. Do we know if its something new or just a rehash of a prior program of her's?


It appears to be a rehash.  I did send Nancy Grace a link to the statements we are posting however, so maybe she'll discuss those too:

Friday 8/11/06 - Nancy Grace CNN Headline News:
(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/NancyGrace081106.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on August 10, 2006, 06:41:37 PM
From This Weeks Dana Pretzer Show thread in the Lounge:

Next Live Shows

August 11th 9pm et- Tim Miller From Texas Equusearch

August 13th 10pm et- Ed Lozzi from Edward Lozzi and Associates What really happened to Superman George Reeves.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on August 10, 2006, 06:42:14 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
I need to get some work done so I'll be lurking and not posting.  BBL


Scoop's sister, the one with the funny Indian accent from Michigan which is Margaritaville north, said 'da cah was in da cop shop da next morning.'  I never asked her which car because her IQ is such that I cannot reach that high, (and she told me that). :roll:  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: WidgetTheMidget on August 10, 2006, 06:43:02 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Rammsteins correction of the bottom part of our rough translation:

At the bottom of his second page van der Straten writes:

Looking at the results of the measurements, it is possible that the suspect Joran van der Sloot was indeed walking from the Marriot to the Wyndham and that this could still have resulted in reverse order picking up/registering of the cell-phone ID's.

Then Ramm adds:

In dutch it says that even though it looks like he was walking from the Wyndham towards the Marriot when first looking at the mobile-phone ID records, actual measurements have shown that Joran could have been walking (as he was saying) from the Marriot towards the Wyndham and still get the results that the ID records have shown.

In other words, Joran could have just as easily been telling the truth about walking from the Marriot to the Wyndham, the phone ID-records in this are not conclusive according to the measurements.


In Between The Ton Of Lies ............

There Lies An Ounce Of Truth ..........

 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: WidgetTheMidget on August 10, 2006, 06:45:00 PM
Quote from: "terryd270"
I'm curious but some of the members of the PIMPS are here in Florida if I heard right, well can't the FBI bring them in for an interview?  Just curious..


Terry You Have A Car Like Tony Soprano ..........

Pay Them A Visit ...........

Make Sure You Bring An Italian Friend ............

 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: WidgetTheMidget on August 10, 2006, 06:46:03 PM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
From This Weeks Dana Pretzer Show thread in the Lounge:

Next Live Shows

August 11th 9pm et- Tim Miller From Texas Equusearch

August 13th 10pm et- Ed Lozzi from Edward Lozzi and Associates What really happened to Superman George Reeves.


DANA SHOULD GET BAILS & ALYSE ON THE SHOW ..................

 :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: WidgetTheMidget on August 10, 2006, 06:48:04 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "terryd270"
Is there anything on the stations about the case besides N.G tomorrow night.. Do we know if its something new or just a rehash of a prior program of her's?


It appears to be a rehash.  I did send Nancy Grace a link to the statements we are posting however, so maybe she'll discuss those too:

Friday 8/11/06 - Nancy Grace CNN Headline News:
(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/NancyGrace081106.jpg)


hEY kLAAS .............

gREAT wORK ............

dO yOU kNOW wHERE jUG iS hIDING ................

 :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on August 10, 2006, 06:49:42 PM
HEY Third....did you check out the sports related thread of Piazza in the Lounge yet?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on August 10, 2006, 06:51:05 PM
Just wondering what the strategy was having van der straaten, Jacobs and Croes question Joran, and Kelly and others whose names I can't recall at the moment question the 2Ks...

Tylergal, I do believe I remember that post about the cah..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on August 10, 2006, 06:51:13 PM
Quote from: "Frijole"
If I recall, Joran was supposed to be playing tennis with Guido and then they went to the casino that night... so I'm thinking Guido was with Joran.  I also think we now know why he fled the island within a few days.


Guido also sold the car that he owned on the night of 5/29 and bought a new one within days of Natalee's disappearance.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: terryd270 on August 10, 2006, 06:51:28 PM
Quote from: "WidgetTheMidget"
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
From This Weeks Dana Pretzer Show thread in the Lounge:

Next Live Shows

August 11th 9pm et- Tim Miller From Texas Equusearch

August 13th 10pm et- Ed Lozzi from Edward Lozzi and Associates What really happened to Superman George Reeves.


DANA SHOULD GET BAILS & ALYSE ON THE SHOW ..................

 :roll:


I wonder if the FBI has talked to Bails and Alyse about the case..  Don't the FBI have authority to talk to people about this case are they not allowed.. They are here in the US..  

Widget,

I hate South Beach, its too fake for me..  I haven't been there in 30 years and I think it has a lot of the same stuff that makes Aruba attractive to some..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on August 10, 2006, 06:55:54 PM
Quote from: "terryd270"
I wouldn't be surprised that Paulus, Anita and others in power had nightly meetings on the case and how they could spend it.. They spoon fed Joran with information that he needed to stay away from and point the fingers at the Kalpoe's..  I guess my problem is that I don't think the Kalpoe's are very smart and that if it was them, they would of already been convicted..  They are greedy but I don't think they are smart..  The Sloots are smart but not too greedy, I think they do things like a chess match and some of the posting and information we get are from that group..  They know how to give misinformation..  It was Joran that said hey you guys we just need to say we dropped that girl off at the HI and keep to our stories..  Yes Deepak being STUPID adds the details about the securities guards because he wants to be accepted as one of Joran's friends and not just a taxi ride..  Well hopefully we will see the answers to this but it seems the biggest lies have been from Joran and thats why he was in jail two more months than Deepak and Satish.. I'm sure they checked the phone calls and computer records of these two and they only found small errors where with Joran they couldn't find any truth..

Sad to say I guess I feel that if there is any truth its in between the lies of the Kalpoes vs no truth and all lies of Joran..  "He moved her underware to the side and stuck in his index finger, and then another finger".. But on the beach she told him that she was a good french kisser, I would assume kissing would come first before the other part..  If you can just picture Joran as I describe him that some felt I was being mean spirited, I think you will see that he is exactly like I describe his appearance..  He gets away with his lies because people only see the facade he had on the outside and not what he really looks like (inside and outside)..


I was told by an Aruban, upper middle-class, shopowner, that she lived near Ben (Voc)King and the VanderSloots were staying at the Ben King house during Joran's time at KIA.  Guess who was in charge of KIA?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: WidgetTheMidget on August 10, 2006, 06:57:49 PM
Quote from: "terryd270"
Quote from: "WidgetTheMidget"
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
From This Weeks Dana Pretzer Show thread in the Lounge:

Next Live Shows

August 11th 9pm et- Tim Miller From Texas Equusearch

August 13th 10pm et- Ed Lozzi from Edward Lozzi and Associates What really happened to Superman George Reeves.


DANA SHOULD GET BAILS & ALYSE ON THE SHOW ..................

 :roll:


I wonder if the FBI has talked to Bails and Alyse about the case..  Don't the FBI have authority to talk to people about this case are they not allowed.. They are here in the US..  

Widget,

I hate South Beach, its too fake for me..  I haven't been there in 30 years and I think it has a lot of the same stuff that makes Aruba attractive to some..


The Last Night In Aruba Probably Applies To All 20 .............

Date Rape Drugs Probably Applies To All 20 ............

Where Did The Other 19 Wake-Up The Next Morning ..........

 :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: JuJu on August 10, 2006, 06:59:22 PM
Quote from: "WidgetTheMidget"
Quote from: "terryd270"
Quote from: "WidgetTheMidget"
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
From This Weeks Dana Pretzer Show thread in the Lounge:

Next Live Shows

August 11th 9pm et- Tim Miller From Texas Equusearch

August 13th 10pm et- Ed Lozzi from Edward Lozzi and Associates What really happened to Superman George Reeves.


DANA SHOULD GET BAILS & ALYSE ON THE SHOW ..................

 :roll:



iF ONLY WE COULD FIND SOME OF THEM

I wonder if the FBI has talked to Bails and Alyse about the case..  Don't the FBI have authority to talk to people about this case are they not allowed.. They are here in the US..  

Widget,

I hate South Beach, its too fake for me..  I haven't been there in 30 years and I think it has a lot of the same stuff that makes Aruba attractive to some..


The Last Night In Aruba Probably Applies To All 20 .............

Date Rape Drugs Probably Applies To All 20 ............

Where Did The Other 19 Wake-Up The Next Morning ..........

 :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: terryd270 on August 10, 2006, 06:59:28 PM
Tylergal,

I can here Ben King telling Joran "Find mess you got us into now Joran" but its ok we know what to do, just be more careful next time..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: terryd270 on August 10, 2006, 07:08:43 PM
I think I will go for now but its a lot of information that we are hearing now and its sad..  Is this all being released because the civil case was dismissed here?  I guess I'm still wondering why are we getting this stuff 13 months later..  I assume someone took a big chance releasing this information to us.. I just wished it was 13 months ago but then we thought they might have a trial, yea right..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Leslie on August 10, 2006, 07:08:44 PM
Where in any of the transcripts is the story about driving past Joran's "big house" (but not stopping to go inside)?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: igsigs on August 10, 2006, 07:25:45 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"

In other words, Joran could have just as easily been telling the truth about walking from the Marriot to the Wyndham, the phone ID-records in this are not conclusive according to the measurements.

Big thanks to Rammstein for the trans on cell phone doc.

But, VDStraaten's defense of the cell phone discrepancy states that it is "possible" that Joran is telling the truth. Possible what...5%...10%...50%? The possibility could be very small, especially since Joran's truthtelling skills are involved. Without further info, i will have to question Ramm's assesment that "Joran could just as easily been telling the truth".


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on August 10, 2006, 07:28:02 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "klaasend"

In other words, Joran could have just as easily been telling the truth about walking from the Marriot to the Wyndham, the phone ID-records in this are not conclusive according to the measurements.

Big thanks to Rammstein for the trans on cell phone doc.

But, VDStraaten's defense of the cell phone discrepancy states that it is "possible" that Joran is telling the truth. Possible what...5%...10%...50%? The possibility could be very small, especially since Joran's truthtelling skills are involved. Without further info, i will have to question Ramm's assesment that "Joran could just as easily been telling the truth".


My point exactly.  Why would we lean towards Van Der Straaten's possibility that Joran is telling the truth.  You would expect Straaten to say that given the fact that he is such good friends with the family. :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: San on August 10, 2006, 07:31:58 PM
FROM DEEPAK'S JUNE 13TH STATEMENT:

Then Joran's father said to us that the situation could get better but also worse. Joran's father had asked my mother if we had an attorney. My mother said no, because we have never had any problems on Aruba.

What other problems did Deepak have in Suriname.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: MuffyBee on August 10, 2006, 07:34:50 PM
Quote from: "San"
FROM DEEPAK'S JUNE 13TH STATEMENT:

Then Joran's father said to us that the situation could get better but also worse. Joran's father had asked my mother if we had an attorney. My mother said no, because we have never had any problems on Aruba.

What other problems did Deepak have in Suriname.


That is an interesting statement.  Most people would say "we never had any problems".  But when the "on Aruba" part is added, it appears there have been problems, just not on Aruba.  That's the feeling I get from that statement.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: MuffyBee on August 10, 2006, 07:36:40 PM
I would sure like to know what, if any problems Deepak and/or Satish had elsewhere.  I remember there was talk of trouble in Suriname, I think.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: igsigs on August 10, 2006, 07:46:39 PM
Klaas, van der Straaten is really pissing me off. His first contribution was pathetic. You have Joran saying that Deepak and two other people killed Natalee and buried her by a wall of the fishermans huts. Van der Straaten's opinion of that blockbuster news?...Joran was weeping. Horrible. And turned in days later.

Now we have a technical report where he gives a excuse for Joran that is backed up by nothing technical/statistical? On July freaking 3rd? By that time he already knew that the Kalpoes were going to be released on the 5th. I surprised they even bothered to look at the cell records.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Freebird on August 10, 2006, 07:51:04 PM
Quote from: "Leslie"
Where in any of the transcripts is the story about driving past Joran's "big house" (but not stopping to go inside)?


I would like to know the answer to that. I didnt know that was an open issue, if it is.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: igsigs on August 10, 2006, 07:51:45 PM
6/29 Deepak statement up on BFN.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on August 10, 2006, 07:57:43 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"


I was told by an Aruban, upper middle-class, shopowner, that she lived near Ben (Voc)King and the VanderSloots were staying at the Ben King house during Joran's time at KIA.  Guess who was in charge of KIA?


I don't think Ben King was Director of the prison anymore by that time.  I think he just worked in the Prosecutors Office.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Leslie on August 10, 2006, 07:59:27 PM
Quote from: "Freebird"
Quote from: "Leslie"
Where in any of the transcripts is the story about driving past Joran's "big house" (but not stopping to go inside)?

I would like to know the answer to that. I didnt know that was an open issue, if it is.

But, driving to the VDS compound was the first order given to choffer Deepak by Joran after leaving C&C's.  How do Deepak, Satish and Joran  forget about that?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Anna on August 10, 2006, 08:00:00 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Klaas, van der Straaten is really pissing me off. His first contribution was pathetic. You have Joran saying that Deepak and two other people killed Natalee and buried her by a wall of the fishermans huts. Van der Straaten's opinion of that blockbuster news?...Joran was weeping. Horrible. And turned in days later.

Now we have a technical report where he gives a excuse for Joran that is backed up by nothing technical/statistical? On July freaking 3rd? By that time he already knew that the Kalpoes were going to be released on the 5th. I surprised they even bothered to look at the cell records.



This is what is upsetting me, too, IGS,

I know if vStraaten is involved, then it is a trick of some sort to exonerate Joran so I start looking for the catch and if I don't see it, I am even more concerned.

Have we seen any statement where Joran "retracted" anything?  I will have to see that to believe it for I still think Uncle Jan retracted it for him.  That is why HE is the one to question Joran so much now in these statements--to prevent Joran from saying something he is not supposed to say, or confess.

I am not his mother, thank God, and Joran's tears mean nothing to me at all, even less than they mean to him as they are fake.  Or he is only sorry he got caught and his father is angry with him.  Van der Straaten should have recused himself or totally stuck to administrative work and NEVER allowed direct contact with his best friend's son in this manner.  This is the worst conflict of interest situation I have ever seen by law enforcement.  And it is intentional to make it impossible to ever have a trial.   :evil:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on August 10, 2006, 08:05:57 PM
DEEPAK - JUNE 29TH STATEMENT - FROM Blogs for Natalee now posted in a thread.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Anna on August 10, 2006, 08:09:31 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
[
My point exactly.  Why would we lean toward Van Der Straaten's possibility that Joran is telling the truth.  You would expect Straaten to say that given the fact that he is such good friends with the family. :roll:



No, Klaas,
I would expect him to recuse himself and maintain at least a fifty Yard distance from his best friend's son at all times.  

My former neighbor used to be a Federal Judge until a car bomb blew off his legs and then he went back to just Circuit Court Judge and he would never ever hear a case that involved any of us neighbors even if we didn't know him well at all.  

In a small town it was hard to find one we did not know if we ever had legal problems and once we had to use the juvenile court judge because he was the one we knew the least even though it was a vehicular accident case.  Even the appearance of wrong-doing is to be avoided if a court is to have any credibility at all.  

When you combine stunts like this with trashing Beth and even Natalee it is just infuriating.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: San on August 10, 2006, 08:15:37 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "igsigs"
Klaas, van der Straaten is really pissing me off. His first contribution was pathetic. You have Joran saying that Deepak and two other people killed Natalee and buried her by a wall of the fishermans huts. Van der Straaten's opinion of that blockbuster news?...Joran was weeping. Horrible. And turned in days later.

Now we have a technical report where he gives a excuse for Joran that is backed up by nothing technical/statistical? On July freaking 3rd? By that time he already knew that the Kalpoes were going to be released on the 5th. I surprised they even bothered to look at the cell records.

This is what is upsetting me, too, IGS,

I know if vStraaten is involved, then it is a trick of some sort to exonerate Joran so I start looking for the catch and if I don't see it, I am even more concerned.

Have we seen any statement where Joran "retracted" anything?  I will have to see that to believe it for I still think Uncle Jan retracted it for him.  That is why HE is the one to question Joran so much now in these statements--to prevent Joran from saying something he is not supposed to say, or confess.

I am not his mother, thank God, and Joran's tears mean nothing to me at all, even less than they mean to him as they are fake.  Or he is only sorry he got caught and his father is angry with him.  Van der Straaten should have recused himself or totally stuck to administrative work and NEVER allowed direct contact with his best friend's son in this manner.  This is the worst conflict of interest situation I have ever seen by law enforcement.  And it is intentional to make it impossible to ever have a trial.   :evil:

I don't believe for one second that Joran was crying.  Van der Straten thew those words in his statement.  I would bet that Straten is quite disturbed by Joran's actions for showing no remorse.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Freebird on August 10, 2006, 08:19:02 PM
Quote from: "Leslie"
Quote from: "Freebird"
Quote from: "Leslie"
Where in any of the transcripts is the story about driving past Joran's "big house" (but not stopping to go inside)?

I would like to know the answer to that. I didnt know that was an open issue, if it is.

But, driving to the VDS compound was the first order given to choffer Deepak by Joran after leaving C&C's.  How do Deepak, Satish and Joran  forget about that?


No idea.  I'd like to know when that bit entered the scenario and if it is just part of Joran's tale or if they all stated that at some point.  Maybe we'll find out.  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: terryd270 on August 10, 2006, 08:19:11 PM
I think they (Sloots) were getting ready to serve the Kalpoes up for the crime..  I think it was match point and Joran double faulted and it became a tie..  They are all a bunch of scum but I still believe Joran is the king of the hill on that island..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: WidgetTheMidget on August 10, 2006, 08:23:44 PM
Quote from: "Leslie"
Quote from: "Freebird"
Quote from: "Leslie"
Where in any of the transcripts is the story about driving past Joran's "big house" (but not stopping to go inside)?

I would like to know the answer to that. I didnt know that was an open issue, if it is.

But, driving to the VDS compound was the first order given to choffer Deepak by Joran after leaving C&C's.  How do Deepak, Satish and Joran  forget about that?


I Remember Joran Stating The Drive-By At His House .............

This Came Out Later After Someone Who May Have Been Credible Stated

That They Saw Deepaks Car Heading Towards Jorans House .........

 :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: terryd270 on August 10, 2006, 08:27:34 PM
I'm sure some of us have watch a debate team match where each side will pick a subject and debate the pros or cons of the subject.. Then they will switch sides and debate the reverse side.. I think Joran is good at that, he is given all the statements and he creates his lies to the evidence.. I don't think either or both Kalpoes are smart enough for that type of deceit, do you??? They might lie but then you expect them to lie and they get caught in their lies.. Where Joran uses his gift of gab to get what he wants and to get others to get it for him. "Joran gets all the girls""..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: igsigs on August 10, 2006, 08:29:21 PM
6/29 Deepak

"You are telling me that John Charles CROES has stated that i wrote while i was chatting with him that i had written that the girl had put her hands in/down my pants. I can say the following. I did this to frustrate/mess up the investigation. I wanted to direct the focus of the police on myself and Joran because we were afraid that Satish would get the details wrong with regard to the "Holiday Inn" story."

Deepak is saying that he is admitting to sexual acts (bringing the heat down on all of them) because Satish will blow the HI story? WTF?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: terryd270 on August 10, 2006, 08:29:32 PM
I assume those on the island of Aruba are not too happy with all the information that is coming out right now..  So sad too bad...  This is going to be hard to spin...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Anna on August 10, 2006, 08:30:35 PM
.
I wonder if Natalee also told Joran that her parents big farm was named "Tara" and it had big columns on the front where she sat around in long dresses and said "Oh, fiddle-dee-dee!" alot.

 :roll:

If you're going to stereotype, Joran, at least get in the right century!

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: terryd270 on August 10, 2006, 08:33:16 PM
I'm not taking up for Deepak but its why a rape case is so hard to prove.. The rapist gets several of his friends to say they had sex with her and I think thats the same thing Deepak was doing for Joran.. No one in their right mind is going to grab for Deepak's thing.. Just a thought and I'm just throwing it out there..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: WidgetTheMidget on August 10, 2006, 08:35:13 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
.
I wonder if Natalee also told Joran that her parents big farm was named "Tara" and it had big columns on the front where she sat around in long dresses and said "Oh, fiddle-dee-dee!" alot.

 :roll:

If you're going to stereotype, Joran, at least get in the right century!

.


I'd Like To Stick A Cattle Prod Up Jorans Arse ..............

I'd Like To Punch Anita In The Face ...........

I'd Like All The Perps  Penis' Guillotined ................

I'd Like A Tsunami To Hit Aruba Within The Year ...................

 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: terryd270 on August 10, 2006, 08:36:08 PM
I kinda think the same way as another poster that said that Joran uses other conquest in his story line and thats why some want to believe him..  Its like reading a hustler type writing where its written as a girl but you know a guy wrote it.. Its what the guy wants and never about the girl...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: sharon on August 10, 2006, 08:37:34 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "klaasend"
I need to get some work done so I'll be lurking and not posting.  BBL


Scoop's sister, the one with the funny Indian accent from Michigan which is Margaritaville north, said 'da cah was in da cop shop da next morning.'  I never asked her which car because her IQ is such that I cannot reach that high, (and she told me that). :roll:  :roll:


Is that what the problem is? Seems like a very realistic explanation. But what's with the 'speak'"? Thanks Tylergal.

(sorry for interrupting. I'm reading)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: terryd270 on August 10, 2006, 08:37:44 PM
Widget your getting soft in parent hood..

"'I'd Like A Tsunami To Hit Aruba Within The Year ..................."

You would never have waited that long.. :D  :D  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Ono on August 10, 2006, 08:38:18 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
DEEPAK - JUNE 29TH STATEMENT - FROM Blogs for Natalee now posted in a thread.


 :shock A lot of really interesting things in there to digest...He is now arrogant and prissy and bossing the authorities around... Also, for starters, how is it not possible to call a mobile phone from a home phone ????  Unless maybe said mobile phone is with someon who is in a boat out on the water ??  I'm also beginning to think Deepak wasn't home at all that night...And sooooo early (before 31 May) he is suspicious that his phone/computer, etc. is being monitored ?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: terryd270 on August 10, 2006, 08:38:58 PM
Everyone take care and thanks to Klaasend for all the stuff she does behind the computer.. She is great..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: WidgetTheMidget on August 10, 2006, 08:39:19 PM
Quote from: "terryd270"
Widget your getting soft in parent hood..

"'I'd Like A Tsunami To Hit Aruba Within The Year ..................."

You would never have waited that long.. :D  :D  :D


I Wish The Hezbollah Would Set Up Camp On Aruba .................

 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: San on August 10, 2006, 08:40:54 PM
FROM DEEPAK'S JUNE 29TH STATEMENT:

If I had anything to hide than I would have never told the police about John Charles CROES. Because that just worsened the situation. Even though this never happened, about the girl putting her hands in/down my pants, I would like to know what kind of crime this is. I am again saying this never happened, but it is just my question to the district attorney.

Deepak seems a little worried here.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on August 10, 2006, 08:43:18 PM
Quote from: "terryd270"
Widget your getting soft in parent hood..

"'I'd Like A Tsunami To Hit Aruba Within The Year ..................."

You would never have waited that long.. :D  :D  :D


I am not an Aruba fan...

But I don't want to see innocent babies and animals get washed away by a natural disaster...

as for those responsible I would like a competent investigation, a trial and a sentence...

Justice...and take the high road.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: San on August 10, 2006, 08:44:46 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
.
I wonder if Natalee also told Joran that her parents big farm was named "Tara" and it had big columns on the front where she sat around in long dresses and said "Oh, fiddle-dee-dee!" alot.

 :roll:

If you're going to stereotype, Joran, at least get in the right century!

.

 :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Ono on August 10, 2006, 08:45:00 PM
Quote from: "Freebird"
Quote from: "Leslie"
Quote from: "Freebird"
Quote from: "Leslie"
Where in any of the transcripts is the story about driving past Joran's "big house" (but not stopping to go inside)?

I would like to know the answer to that. I didnt know that was an open issue, if it is.

But, driving to the VDS compound was the first order given to choffer Deepak by Joran after leaving C&C's.  How do Deepak, Satish and Joran  forget about that?


No idea.  I'd like to know when that bit entered the scenario and if it is just part of Joran's tale or if they all stated that at some point.  Maybe we'll find out.  :lol:


I still think the Sloot compound was the scene of this crime. That would account for their conciousness of guilt by making up that story that Natalee wanted to see Joran's so-called "big house", which in reality is thier cover story for taking her there.  I still think the only time Natalee was at the beach was after the fact, and well hidden, until they could figure out how to dispose of her...which must have happened within the next 24-36 hours.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: WidgetTheMidget on August 10, 2006, 08:45:09 PM
I Believe That If This Case Disappears ............

Joran Will Disappear Also ..............

 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: WidgetTheMidget on August 10, 2006, 08:46:55 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "terryd270"
Widget your getting soft in parent hood..

"'I'd Like A Tsunami To Hit Aruba Within The Year ..................."

You would never have waited that long.. :D  :D  :D


I am not an Aruba fan...

But I don't want to see innocent babies and animals get washed away by a natural disaster...

as for those responsible I would like a competent investigation, a trial and a sentence...

Justice...and take the high road.


I'll Go Along With Saving The Animals .............

 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on August 10, 2006, 08:47:50 PM
Quote from: "WidgetTheMidget"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "terryd270"
Widget your getting soft in parent hood..

"'I'd Like A Tsunami To Hit Aruba Within The Year ..................."

You would never have waited that long.. :D  :D  :D


I am not an Aruba fan...

But I don't want to see innocent babies and animals get washed away by a natural disaster...

as for those responsible I would like a competent investigation, a trial and a sentence...

Justice...and take the high road.


I'll Go Along With Saving The Animals .............

 8)


Widge, come on...Innocent children?

I don't think you really mean that....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Sue on August 10, 2006, 08:47:57 PM
Quote from: "WidgetTheMidget"
I Believe That If This Case Disappears ............

Joran Will Disappear Also ..............

 8)


he needs to disappear violently  , let his parent feel the pain


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: WidgetTheMidget on August 10, 2006, 08:49:15 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "WidgetTheMidget"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "terryd270"
Widget your getting soft in parent hood..

"'I'd Like A Tsunami To Hit Aruba Within The Year ..................."

You would never have waited that long.. :D  :D  :D


I am not an Aruba fan...

But I don't want to see innocent babies and animals get washed away by a natural disaster...

as for those responsible I would like a competent investigation, a trial and a sentence...

Justice...and take the high road.


I'll Go Along With Saving The Animals .............

 8)


Widge, come on...Innocent children?

I don't think you really mean that....


I AM REALLY TIRED OF ARUBA ...................

 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: WidgetTheMidget on August 10, 2006, 08:50:20 PM
Quote from: "Sue"
Quote from: "WidgetTheMidget"
I Believe That If This Case Disappears ............

Joran Will Disappear Also ..............

 8)


he needs to disappear violently  , let his parent feel the pain


AND I HOPE ITS CAUGHT ON TAPE & PUT ON THE NEWS ...............

 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: robots on August 10, 2006, 08:50:55 PM
JORAN=KILLER

K1 and K2 =DUMBASSES that know what happened
 
others also know

i hate them all


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Windsor on August 10, 2006, 08:52:11 PM
HI EVERYONE --

re Deepak's 6/29 statement -- I finally get Joran's text message, "thanks for waiting for me."  It's total sarcasm.  So, why did Deepak leave Joran somewhere?  Sounds like Deepak cut and ran from something.

Hmm, with Joran's anger management issues, maybe he just threw his shoes somewhere 'cause he was p-ssed that he didn't have a ride home from  ???  that is the question ...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Sue on August 10, 2006, 08:52:17 PM
Quote from: "WidgetTheMidget"
Quote from: "Sue"
Quote from: "WidgetTheMidget"
I Believe That If This Case Disappears ............

Joran Will Disappear Also ..............

 8)


he needs to disappear violently  , let his parent feel the pain


AND I HOPE ITS CAUGHT ON TAPE & PUT ON THE NEWS ...............

 8)


ROFLMFAO :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on August 10, 2006, 08:52:44 PM
Quote from: "WidgetTheMidget"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "WidgetTheMidget"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "terryd270"
Widget your getting soft in parent hood..

"'I'd Like A Tsunami To Hit Aruba Within The Year ..................."

You would never have waited that long.. :D  :D  :D


I am not an Aruba fan...

But I don't want to see innocent babies and animals get washed away by a natural disaster...

as for those responsible I would like a competent investigation, a trial and a sentence...

Justice...and take the high road.


I'll Go Along With Saving The Animals .............

 8)


Widge, come on...Innocent children?

I don't think you really mean that....


I AM REALLY TIRED OF ARUBA ...................

 8)


Ok...but we'll have to agree to disagree on this...

And I'm not going to say that I would shed any tears if someone beat the holy crap outta joran and the k2's...

But i gotta draw the line on innocents.....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Anna on August 10, 2006, 08:53:50 PM
.
Satish was answering nicely until something seemed to set him off and he became angry.  I went back to see what it could have been.  He was answering the questions until he was asked something like what did you (here the translator indicated that it was the plural you which, as everyone knows, should be ya'll) and then a word seems to be left out.  Something like what did you have at Carlos and Charlie's?  

The word drink was all I could think of that would fit well there.  Would he become angry that the drinks were mentioned?  He did throw out the two yard cups and Joran made sure his was contaminated with the DNA of the tourist to whom he gave the cup.  Could mean something about the drinks and what was put into Natalee's.

Or he could have just forgotten what he was supposed to say, who knows?

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: robots on August 10, 2006, 08:54:30 PM
Quote from: "Windsor"
HI EVERYONE --

re Deepak's 6/29 statement -- I finally get Joran's text message, "thanks for waiting for me."  It's total sarcasm.  So, why did Deepak leave Joran somewhere?  Sounds like Deepak cut and ran from something.

Hmm, with Joran's anger management issues, maybe he just threw his shoes somewhere 'cause he was p-ssed that he didn't have a ride home from  ???  that is the question ...


yep,

sarcasm


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: WidgetTheMidget on August 10, 2006, 08:54:47 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "WidgetTheMidget"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "WidgetTheMidget"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "terryd270"
Widget your getting soft in parent hood..

"'I'd Like A Tsunami To Hit Aruba Within The Year ..................."

You would never have waited that long.. :D  :D  :D


I am not an Aruba fan...

But I don't want to see innocent babies and animals get washed away by a natural disaster...

as for those responsible I would like a competent investigation, a trial and a sentence...

Justice...and take the high road.


I'll Go Along With Saving The Animals .............

 8)


Widge, come on...Innocent children?

I don't think you really mean that....


I AM REALLY TIRED OF ARUBA ...................

 8)


Ok...but we'll have to agree to disagree on this...

And I'm not going to say that I would shed any tears if someone beat the holy crap outta joran and the k2's...

But i gotta draw the line on innocents.....


ITS BETTER TO GET RID OF THE FUTURE PERPS OF THE ISLAND ....

 :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Ono on August 10, 2006, 08:57:10 PM
Quote from: "terryd270"
I think they (Sloots) were getting ready to serve the Kalpoes up for the crime..  I think it was match point and Joran double faulted and it became a tie..  They are all a bunch of scum but I still believe Joran is the king of the hill on that island..


It's as though Joran is a junior mobster boss and the Kalpoes are the hired help, with their main duties being : Providing his chauffeur needs; Acting as general lackeys; Assisting Joran in "working the crowd" when they go out to Carlos & Charlie's on the last night of the targeted young, pretty, and unsuspecting American tourists.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on August 10, 2006, 08:58:26 PM
Well guess I'm in the minority here tonight, but that's ok.

I've been there before....

But some of these comments sound just as hateful as the comments other blogs (and you all know who I mean) say about Beth, and natalee...

It's ugly over there....

And times I have lurked there I felt uncomfortable...

I really think we are different here....

Gonna take a break...

Nite....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: robots on August 10, 2006, 08:58:46 PM
During the conversation Joran showed differing emotions. Sometimes he cried, sometimes he was direct in his answers.



CRIED ??????????????????????????????????

CRIED ????  WHY ?????????????????


cause he was skerrrrrrrrrrrrrrrred ???


GIVE ME A FREAKING BREAK

he knew he killed her

ALE are the BIGGEST BUNCH of IDIOT-CORRUPTS JACKASSES i haev seen in a long time


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: robots on August 10, 2006, 09:00:54 PM
where is BLOW TACO ????

i mean JOE T....


 :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:

OH, i better be careful, he might sue me


NEWSFLASH

JOE aint gonna sue anyone he is a LOAD  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: igsigs on August 10, 2006, 09:01:15 PM
6/29 Deepak

"On your question what Joran's mom meant by telling us that we should stay away from the "Marriot Hotel'. With this she meant that the police were monitoring the area and that we were already in trouble".

Per Anita...already in trouble even before being arrested. And how would she know what areas were being "monitored"? It certainly wasn't being monitored because they thought Natalee was there.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Ono on August 10, 2006, 09:03:01 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
.
I wonder if Natalee also told Joran that her parents big farm was named "Tara" and it had big columns on the front where she sat around in long dresses and said "Oh, fiddle-dee-dee!" alot.

 :roll:

If you're going to stereotype, Joran, at least get in the right century!

.


 :lol: I wonder if she mentioned "Big Sam" and how he saved her?  And how she knelt down on the red clay and swore that as God was her witness, she would never go hungry again?  :lol:  These translucent statements regarding what they imagine a Southerner would say are laughable...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Ono on August 10, 2006, 09:03:48 PM
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "Anna"
.
I wonder if Natalee also told Joran that her parents big farm was named "Tara" and it had big columns on the front where she sat around in long dresses and said "Oh, fiddle-dee-dee!" alot.

 :roll:

If you're going to stereotype, Joran, at least get in the right century!

.


 :lol: I wonder if she mentioned "Big Sam" and how he saved her?  And how she knelt down on the red clay and swore that as God was her witness, she would never go hungry again?  :lol:  These translucent statements regarding what they imagine a Southerner would say are laughable...


I meant to add: "In this day and age."


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: San on August 10, 2006, 09:10:54 PM
Quote from: "Sue"
Quote from: "WidgetTheMidget"
I Believe That If This Case Disappears ............

Joran Will Disappear Also ..............

 8)


he needs to disappear violently, let his parent feel the pain

I agree Sue.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: terryd270 on August 10, 2006, 09:11:14 PM
I understand compassion but the other side attacks Beth, Dave and Natalee that are truely innocent where Joran, Kalpoes and others on that island most likely killed and raped Natalee..  I can take a quote from the other side and then compare it to the most vile one here and ours are mild.. I guess I have to side with Widget and his righteous anger as well as righteous judgment.  I'm think you might be surprised at some of the righteous anger in the bible..

Example:
Matt 21:12-13 And Jesus went into the temple of God, and cast out all them that sold and bought in the temple, and overthrew the tables of the moneychangers, and the seats of them that sold doves, And said unto them, It is written, My house shall be called the house of prayer; but ye have made it a den of thieves.

I know there are a lot of such passages but this sounds like an "angry" Christ to me. How can you wreck a temple and kick people out"?  

This is my opinion and nothing more or less.. Just that a lot of people forget there Anger is "what we are". Wrath is "what we do" because of that anger.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Ono on August 10, 2006, 09:11:35 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
6/29 Deepak

"On your question what Joran's mom meant by telling us that we should stay away from the "Marriot Hotel'. With this she meant that the police were monitoring the area and that we were already in trouble".

Per Anita...already in trouble even before being arrested. And how would she know what areas were being "monitored"? It certainly wasn't being monitored because they thought Natalee was there.


I have a question which really means nothing but I've noticed it....why do the Arubans always mis-spell Marriott ?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: terryd270 on August 10, 2006, 09:17:55 PM
Joran and others on that island are responsible for Natalee's death..  The lack of giving justice to Natalee's family and those that trash (Vile trash) of Natalee's family are those that are in charged of that island.. The island will never give Natalee's family justice and thats the reason why I have no compassion for that island..  I hope I'm  wrong but I think even if you find the smoking gun, condom, video tape, bloody seats, etc.. The island will not give Natalee's family justice or the answers that they need to know.. Dave and Beth want to know where their daughter is so they can say goodbye.. They won't get that, at least I don't think the island will give that to them.. The island just wants this to go away so they can be the tourist trap that they pride themselves with..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: sb on August 10, 2006, 09:24:38 PM
There's nothing wrong with getting mad at murderers, rapists, and terrorists.

There is PLENTY wrong with getting mad at a woman who lost her daughter and wants answers as to why and how.

I don't agree with comparisons to our more "zealous" posters as being "no better than" the "other sites". We are in a different moral frame of reality entirely.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Frijole on August 10, 2006, 09:25:36 PM
The thing I find interesting about all of these interrogations is the fact that they all start between noon and 1.  And frankly, they aren't that long.  Remember when they talked about how they were being grilled for 12 hours at a time?  Sure doesn't seem like it to me.  

Then there's the total lack of follow up questions.  Not a single, "Who, what, when, where, why"  

And as someone else already mentioned --- why did Joran get questions by VDS and the Bros a couple of lower levels?  If the same group wasn't questioning all 3 then how could they know what questions to ask?

Obvious corruption.  Makes me sick.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on August 10, 2006, 09:26:57 PM
I hope I never become THAT angry in my life that I would go so far as justify wiping out an entire island of people because of the actions of some.

Would I go to aruba?

Not after this debacle .....

Do I have respect for their ALE and other officials?

Nope, not after this....

But I can't go along with wishing an entire population into the cornfield that would affect people who do live in Aruba who have had nothing to do with the corruption and crime on the island....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: igsigs on August 10, 2006, 09:28:52 PM
Deepak 6/29

"I am not going to declare anything until the office of the DA is going to end my restrictions, then i will cooperate and make a statement."

Interesting "i will stop lying if you release me" strategy by Deepak. Runs counter to all known systems of justice on earth, but appears to have worked in Aruba.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Anna on August 10, 2006, 09:30:39 PM
.
Does anyone else ever get that sinking feeling that maybe all these
docs are being released because they are going to you-know-what the case?   :(


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on August 10, 2006, 09:31:27 PM
I am usually a nice  person. I have made comments that seem out of character for me. I do not regret saying / writing them. Well, maybe one or two sarcastic ones.
This week has been a bad one. The NY judge doesn't want to hear the case. Then they give Paulus money.
Next up, we have these statements which I have been reading carefully.
They do not shed any light on where Natalee is.
It is a peek inside these charaters minds.
The ALE has had these for quite some time.
I was going to say more, but for some reason, I cannot spell.
I did get an email from Brad Gibson at BFN... how nice. I deleted it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: igsigs on August 10, 2006, 09:32:46 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
.
Does anyone else ever get that sinking feeling that maybe all these
docs are being released because they are going to you-know-what the case?   :(

Somewhat, ANNA. The cell phone docs were a shocker.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: San on August 10, 2006, 09:34:11 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
.
Does anyone else ever get that sinking feeling that maybe all these
docs are being released because they are going to you-know-what the case?   :(

Yes


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on August 10, 2006, 09:34:15 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "Anna"
.
Does anyone else ever get that sinking feeling that maybe all these
docs are being released because they are going to you-know-what the case?   :(

Somewhat, ANNA. The cell phone docs were a shocker.



I have been getting that feeling too Anna...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on August 10, 2006, 09:36:09 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
I hope I never become THAT angry in my life that I would go so far as justify wiping out an entire island of people because of the actions of some.

Would I go to aruba?

Not after this debacle .....

Do I have respect for their ALE and other officials?

Nope, not after this....

But I can't go along with wishing an entire population into the cornfield that would affect people who do live in Aruba who have had nothing to do with the corruption and crime on the island....

People are just letting of steam.
We not not have personal rocket launchers or WMD at our fingertips.
So, we use words.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Shell on August 10, 2006, 09:36:44 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
I hope I never become THAT angry in my life that I would go so far as justify wiping out an entire island of people because of the actions of some.

Would I go to aruba?

Not after this debacle .....

Do I have respect for their ALE and other officials?

Nope, not after this....

But I can't go along with wishing an entire population into the cornfield that would affect people who do live in Aruba who have had nothing to do with the corruption and crime on the island....

I agree with you Jacq-I would not wish a tsunami on anyone, and the majority of the island are hard working people just trying to have a nice peaceful life.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Buckeye on August 10, 2006, 09:36:56 PM
Quote from: "Leslie"
Where in any of the transcripts is the story about driving past Joran's "big house" (but not stopping to go inside)?



Joran's statement of June 14th, briefly mentions his house.

In this statement he calls the director of his school, Bob....not Mr. Werner...but Bob.....several times...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Anna on August 10, 2006, 09:37:26 PM
.
I think Widget is clowning and don't believe for one minute he would really harm any innocent childor adult for that matter.  But I hate to see Jacquie upset, too.

I take Widget more as dark humor and not seriously at all.  And hate to admit it but also find it funny as hell sometimes!   :oops:

And I am trying to be good and not join in much as I would like to for I am not good at the high road.  We did that for so long and the otehr side just got nastier and nastier until now I can't believe the things they say.  No, it is not the same but I understand being made uncomfortable, too.

So think I will take a break before the temptation to get funny overwhelms me.  But he doesn't really mean it, Jac.  Our Widget has a heart of gold I am pretty sure.   8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on August 10, 2006, 09:37:32 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
I hope I never become THAT angry in my life that I would go so far as justify wiping out an entire island of people because of the actions of some.

Would I go to aruba?

Not after this debacle .....

Do I have respect for their ALE and other officials?

Nope, not after this....

But I can't go along with wishing an entire population into the cornfield that would affect people who do live in Aruba who have had nothing to do with the corruption and crime on the island....

People are just letting of steam.
We not not have personal rocket launchers or WMD at our fingertips.
So, we use words.


Yes, and I am using words too.

And I let off steam too.

And I am just expressing myself too Kat Gram.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: terryd270 on August 10, 2006, 09:38:01 PM
Jacqueline,

None of that is going to happen and we all know that.. The island will be there in a million years, I'm not sure about us being around but the island will be..  I'm not sure you read the samethings that I have read on the other side about Beth and even Natalee..  I guess I don't think Natalee's family raped or killed anyone over there and then attack their family and I do believe that is what I have seen from Aruba.. I been wrong before and I'm sure I will be wrong in the future.. I just don't see all that good from the island and therefore my compassion is for the victim...  We can think of evilness in a lot of things in the past.. When I see Aurba, I think of Natalee's nightmare and no one to help her because its not their JOB..

I guess I'm trying to put values on people that really have their own values.. I have never had a child killed or raped but if I did, I think I would of taken out my anger on that island already..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on August 10, 2006, 09:38:35 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
.
Does anyone else ever get that sinking feeling that maybe all these
docs are being released because they are going to you-know-what the case?   :(


  ANNA.. YES........  its SAD..

Hi Everyone....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Frijole on August 10, 2006, 09:38:50 PM
Well if you thought you hated Joran before... then you won't want to miss his statement from June 24th that just got posted at BFN.  There are 2.  He goes into graphic detail about his sexual relations with a couple of women.  I'd hate to be these poor women... but to behonest, whatever it takes for the local population to rise up and vent their anger at Joran vs. the family ... then so be it.  

Natalee didn't cause Aruba's problems...

Wanna know what kind of "boy" Joran is?  Then read his own words.  Sickening.  Sickening.  Sickening. May he rot in hell.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on August 10, 2006, 09:40:49 PM
Hello monkeys.  Good to see so much discussion tonight. I have been reading and found some interesting things in these statements.  Gosh, they should have let me question these guys.  I bet I would have a few more answers by now.  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: terryd270 on August 10, 2006, 09:40:58 PM
I Will not be back because but I do hope you find the justice you are all looking for.. Klaasend you can remove me, I have nothing to add..

Bye and all have a great night.. Its the weekend and hopefully you all will do something fun and realized that life is short and thank God we live here and not in Aruba..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on August 10, 2006, 09:42:47 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
.
I think Widget is clowning and don't believe for one minute he would really harm any innocent childor adult for that matter.  But I hate to see Jacquie upset, too.

I take Widget more as dark humor and not seriously at all.  And hate to admit it but also find it funny as hell sometimes!   :oops:

And I am trying to be good and not join in much as I would like to for I am not good at the high road.  We did that for so long and the otehr side just got nastier and nastier until now I can't believe the things they say.  No, it is not the same but I understand being made uncomfortable, too.

So think I will take a break before the temptation to get funny overwhelms me.  But he doesn't really mean it, Jac.  Our Widget has a heart of gold I am pretty sure.   8)


You're right Anna, and I love Widgey...Always have...

And that was my point to him, that I really didn't believe he meant those things....

I should really take a break too.

Nite for real this time....

For those who i offended, that wasn't my intent....

But I've been outspoken since Kindergarten and i guess I'll stay that way 4 ever....

Peace out~


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on August 10, 2006, 09:45:05 PM
JORAN'S JUNE 24, 2005 STATEMENT AS POSTED AT BFN:

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=193


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on August 10, 2006, 09:45:08 PM
Quote from: "cubbeegirl"
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "Anna"
.
Does anyone else ever get that sinking feeling that maybe all these
docs are being released because they are going to you-know-what the case?   :(

Somewhat, ANNA. The cell phone docs were a shocker.



I have been getting that feeling too Anna...

Where did these documents come from ?
It's the people in Aruba who need to read them.
Joran thinks he is a hero on Aruba and no one is making him feel any different.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on August 10, 2006, 09:46:14 PM
Quote from: "terryd270"
I Will not be back because but I do hope you find the justice you are all looking for.. Klaasend you can remove me, I have nothing to add..

Bye and all have a great night.. Its the weekend and hopefully you all will do something fun and realized that life is short and thank God we live here and not in Aruba..


Terryd - what happened?  No, I will not remove you!  You get back here!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on August 10, 2006, 09:47:50 PM
Quote from: "terryd270"
I Will not be back because but I do hope you find the justice you are all looking for.. Klaasend you can remove me, I have nothing to add..

Bye and all have a great night.. Its the weekend and hopefully you all will do something fun and realized that life is short and thank God we live here and not in Aruba..

Terry, please re consider. You are an asset to this cage.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Frijole on August 10, 2006, 09:49:21 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
JORAN'S JUNE 24, 2005 STATEMENT AS POSTED AT BFN:

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=193


Klaas there were 2 from the 24th... one was taken later in the day... that was the one that really got to me.  This is one sick  kid.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Frijole on August 10, 2006, 09:52:02 PM
I'm sure Klaas will add this to the link but here is the 2nd statement from 6/24 as posted on BFN:



PROCES-VERBAAL

We, Dennis Domenico JACOBS and Luigi Angelo Giovanni CROES, head-officer and officer-first class with the Korps Politie Aruba, first mentioned attaced to the robbery project team (Atraco Team) and the latter with the section often occurring crimes district 2, declare the following.

On Friday, June 24th, at approximately 18.40 hours, we, the reporting officers, interrogated/interviewed the suspect:

Joran Andreas Petrus van der SLOOT born in Arnhem, the Netherlands on August 6th 1987, without occupation student (International School of Aruba) and living Montanja 19 on Aruba, for further information.

His statement that was given in Papiamento was translated and transcribed by me, JACOBS, into dutch and goes as follows.

Before we, the reporting officers, started the interview, I, JACOBS, informed the suspect that he was not obliged to make any statement.

I, JACOBS, also informed the suspect that this interview is being taped.

"You are informing me that you have several questions for me and want to hear an answer to those questions. I am prepared to give them.

To your question whether I know a girl named "Karen" and whether I had a sexual relation with her, I answer you the following. Ik know the girl named "Karen". I do not know Karen's last name. I had a sexual relation with her but I do not remember the time period. (With Karen we mean the witness "Karen Theresa Paulina MARTINA"; remark JACOBS).

To your question whether I had a sexual relationship with Karen during "Carnaval" this year, I answer you in the affirmative. During the "fakkeloptocht" this year I was dancing in the "Last-Lap". I think it was near the bridge of the "Renaissance Hotel" when I saw Karen. I saw that Karen went to dance with Jaime CAARASQUILLA, nickname "Beto". I suspect that Karen was drinking at that moment in time but I did not see that. After the "fakkeloptocht" "Jaime CARRASQUILLA", "Freddy ZEDAN", "Karen" and myself walked to "Carlos & Charlies". According to me "Koen GOTTENBOS" was also with us when we were walking to Carlos & Charlies. Inside Carlos & Charlies Karen and I walked upstairs and started french kissing. After that Karen and me walked outside and walked to the "Pier" due east of Carlos & Charlies. When we were standing on the "Pier" I asked Karen if she could give me a "blow-job". Karen agreed to this and started sucking my penis. I do not remember if I was standing upright or if I was lying down on the ground when Karen gave me the blow-job. I have to state that I wanted to have a sexual relationship with Karen but that I did not have a condom on me at that precise moment. After Karen had given me the blow-job Freddy ZEDAN called me on my mobile phone. Freddy told me that they were going to go home and asked me how I would get home. According to me Freddy also told me that he was at that moment in time sitting in the car of "Chato". The name of "Chato" is "Leonardo" but I do not know his last name. According to me Chato is from Mexico. Freddy, Karen and me got a ride from Chato. Chato and Freddy were in the front and Karen and me got into the back. When Karen and me were sitting in the back I think I asked whether I had a sexual relation with her, I answer you the following. I know the girl named "Karen". I do not know Karen's last name. I had a Karen to give me another blow-job, something that she did then do. Chato saw then that Karen was giving me head in his pick-up. Chato drives a green 4-door pick-up of the Ford make when he brought us three, meaning Freddy, Karen and myself a ride to my house. I do not know the license plate of Chato's pick-up. When we arrived at my appartement the 4 of us went inside the appartement. Chato had a hip flask containing whiskey. Chato and Karen drank from the contents. I have to say that I am not sure any more if "Freddy ZEDAN" or "Fernando VIANA" was in the appartement with us. Karen and I went to lie down on the sofa-bed and had put a blanket over us. Karen and I started fondling and having "foreplay". Chato tried to pull the blanket off of us to see what we were doing. Chato asked me to ask Karen if he and I could have sexual relations with Karen together. On Chato's request I asked Karen if she was willing to have sex with me and Chato together. Karen told me that she did not want to have sex with me and Chato. After that Chato and Freddy left. I do not know where Chato and Freddy went to. Karen and I were on the sofa-bed. We started kissing and I fingered Karen. After that I had taken my clothes off. Karen then took off her clothes. At that point I was told by Karen to put on a condom. I went to my drawer and took out a condom and put it on. After that we had sex with each other. I do not know if Karen bled when I had sex with her. At no time did Karen say to me that she did not want to have sex with me. I can also not tell you anymore what the condition was of Karen when I had sex with her in my appartement. She had been drinking but I also had been drinking. We had also both drank from Chato's hip-flask. I don't remember right know what kind of alcoholic drink was in that hip-flask. After Karen and me had sex I went to the bathroom and threw the condom into the toilet. I have no recollection of what happened after that.

I only had sex with Karen three times. The first time I had sex with Karen was on the beach close to the "Havana Niteclub". I do not remember the date, but it was during a "Moonlite Party". On the day Karen and me had sex the first time we had both had alcoholic drinks but we were not drunk.

About two months ago I had sex with Karen for the last time. This happened in my appartement and on that day Karen stayed the night with me. According to me I had told my mother that Karen would be staying for the night.

To your question whether or not I had sex with a girl named "Stephania", I answer you that I have not.

To your question whether I know the girl named "Stephany BOEKHOUWER", I answer you the following. This year, I don't remember the exact date, Freddy, Jaime and me went to a "Houseparty" in Oranjestad. We drove in Jaime's car to the houseparty. The car of Jaime is famous because we had experienced a lot of things in Jaime's car. Jaime has a 4-door green "Honda". On that day Freddy had sex with Stephany BOEKHOUWER on the backseat of Jaime's car. I gave Freddy a condom before he had sex with Stephany. While Freddy was having sex with Stephany on the backseat, Jaime and myself stood down at the trunk of the car and drank alcoholic beverages.

To your question whether I had a relationship with a girl name "Rika", I answer you the following. Rika was my girlfriend but we did not have a sexual relationship with each other. We may have done some french kissing but I did not have sexual relations with her because she is twelve (12) years old. Rika's parents found out about our relationship and that is why we stopped the relationship. I do not know Rika's last name.

This is my statement in accordance with the truth".

J.A.P. van der SLOOT

After the suspect J.A.P. van der SLOOT had read the statement he had given, he stated he would persist in it and signed the statement.

The reporting officers,

JACOBS          CROES


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Frijole on August 10, 2006, 09:56:38 PM
Geez -  I wonder why Beth has been so insistent that these boys are guilty?

I wonder why Jug made the comment he did about shocking the world?

And these people made Dave dig for his own daughter in a landfill?  And made Beth apologise to Deepak and Satish?  

And Greta is inclined to believe this sexual deviant?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: robots on August 10, 2006, 09:56:51 PM
- that his father suffers from bad memory and that because of that his and his fathers statements would not correspond



LOAD ALERT

LOAD ALERT

 :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: robots on August 10, 2006, 09:57:28 PM
Quote from: "Frijole"
Geez -  I wonder why Beth has been so insistent that these boys are guilty?

I wonder why Jug made the comment he did about shocking the world?

And these people made Dave dig for his own daughter in a landfill?  And made Beth apologise to Deepak and Satish?  

And Greta is inclined to believe this sexual deviant?


GRETA MAKES me want to PUKE  :evil:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on August 10, 2006, 09:57:57 PM
Oh, now Tromp and Ooman want to question Joran and he refuses....he had quite a list of requests.  Wonder how long this actually took.  If it were me, I'd have to have that list of requests written in front of me to get them all in for the statement.  JMHO


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Frijole on August 10, 2006, 09:58:50 PM
Quote from: "robots"
- that his father suffers from bad memory and that because of that his and his fathers statements would not correspond



LOAD ALERT

LOAD ALERT

 :twisted:


Yeah... that's about the worst lie Joran told.  A lawyer with a bad memory? ha ha ha


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: robots on August 10, 2006, 09:59:48 PM
i hope GRETA feels like a JACKASS

cause there are gonna be alot of people that think she SUCKS  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on August 10, 2006, 10:01:40 PM
The more statements from Joran that I read the more I think this site should be rated.  I feel the need to cover my ears on occasion...or would that be my eyes.  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: robots on August 10, 2006, 10:02:15 PM
Quote from: "Frijole"
Quote from: "robots"
- that his father suffers from bad memory and that because of that his and his fathers statements would not correspond



LOAD ALERT

LOAD ALERT

 :twisted:


Yeah... that's about the worst lie Joran told.  A lawyer with a bad memory? ha ha ha




i know exactly where this LOAD is leading


here it is..

PAULUS cant remember WHAT TIME he PICKED JORANPIG up at
mcdonalds


NEWSFLASH

we now know HOW JORAN got HOME

PAULUS the SQAULUS PIG  :evil:  :evil:  :evil:  :evil:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on August 10, 2006, 10:05:18 PM
Quote from: "terryd270"
I Will not be back because but I do hope you find the justice you are all looking for.. Klaasend you can remove me, I have nothing to add..

Bye and all have a great night.. Its the weekend and hopefully you all will do something fun and realized that life is short and thank God we live here and not in Aruba..


  Terry sweety..  don't go... K?  
 We all want justice.. I may have missed something..
I cant post or read as much as I could before..
I try and keep up as much as possible,... work has been busy as hell.. even when I am not there I get calls at home..
  I try and be there for a special friend of mine who is going through a bad time.. more then one friend.. plus a bridezilla daughter.
  I dont like to see anyone argue..  life is too short.... I dont know what happend here..????????   I read.. and dont post much anymore..
  HUGS to you Terry..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: robots on August 10, 2006, 10:05:22 PM
We may have done some french kissing but I did not have sexual relations with her because she is twelve (12) years old. Rika's parents found out about our relationship and that is why we stopped the relationship. I do not know Rika's last name.



OMG


what a PIG

nice parenting  ANITA and PAULUS  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Frijole on August 10, 2006, 10:05:24 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
The more statements from Joran that I read the more I think this site should be rated.  I feel the need to cover my ears on occasion...or would that be my eyes.  :roll:


No doubt Lalas... it is crude, but at the same time, if we edited Joran's words then we would not really see the true Joran.  We knew he was a bad boy.. now we know just how bad.

And the family have kept their mouths shut and took the high road while knowing this for over a year... disgusting.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: robots on August 10, 2006, 10:06:38 PM
HERE WE GO
this was the PLAN with Natalee


While Freddy was having sex with Stephany on the backseat, Jaime and myself stood down at the trunk of the car and drank alcoholic beverages.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Frijole on August 10, 2006, 10:10:17 PM
Quote from: "robots"
HERE WE GO
this was the PLAN with Natalee


While Freddy was having sex with Stephany on the backseat, Jaime and myself stood down at the trunk of the car and drank alcoholic beverages.


yeah and I bet there was a video camera involved also.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on August 10, 2006, 10:10:25 PM
I just added it to the 6/24 Joran statement thread.  Now I have to read it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: robots on August 10, 2006, 10:10:42 PM
Quote from: "Frijole"
Quote from: "robots"
HERE WE GO
this was the PLAN with Natalee


While Freddy was having sex with Stephany on the backseat, Jaime and myself stood down at the trunk of the car and drank alcoholic beverages.


yeah and I bet there was a video camera involved also.


yep. the PIMPS strike  :evil:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Frijole on August 10, 2006, 10:12:17 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
I just added it to the 6/24 Joran statement thread.  Now I have to read it.


Brace yourself.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on August 10, 2006, 10:12:30 PM
So, now we know Stephi's last name. I think it is a mis-spelling. Wasn't there an Albert B questioned at the same time as GVC ?
ALBERT BOEKHOUDT ?
.
I just was at work and then the dentist. I am out of it.
.
Alot of things, like Joran's young girlfriend ...12 years old ! !
that we heard about before seem to be true and confirmed...what's next ! !
So, Joe T was hired to rehabilitate this guy's reputation ! ! Because he is an honor student y'know ! !


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Shell on August 10, 2006, 10:13:41 PM
I wonder what was in Chato's hip-flask.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on August 10, 2006, 10:17:09 PM
Don't these statements make you want to (http://i64.photobucket.com/albums/h191/Kat_Gram/vomit-smiley-015.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Ono on August 10, 2006, 10:18:05 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
.
Does anyone else ever get that sinking feeling that maybe all these
docs are being released because they are going to you-know-what the case?   :(


To be honest, (am sorry if my call is negative), realistically, after wirnessing all we here have observed, I have not held out any hope of Lady Justice presiding on Aruba at this point in Time.  Arubs is in severe distress...The truth will out, however, I feel certain.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: San on August 10, 2006, 10:18:29 PM
FROM JORAN'S STATEMENT

Karen and I were on the sofa-bed.

In a previous statement they had the suspects sitting on the floor in Joran's apartment because his bed was on the floor.  Now he has a sofa-bed.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Frijole on August 10, 2006, 10:18:54 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
So, now we know Stephi's last name. I think it is a mis-spelling. Wasn't there an Albert B questioned at the same time as GVC ?
ALBERT BOEKHOUDT ?

.
I just was at work and then the dentist. I am out of it.
.
Alot of things, like Joran's young girlfriend ...12 years old ! !
that we heard about before seem to be true and confirmed...what's next ! !
So, Joe T was hired to rehabilitate this guy's reputation ! ! Because he is an honor student y'know ! !


Great catch Kat!  You aren't out of it at all.  LOL  So have we ever "Tickled" Albert Boekhoudt?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Shell on August 10, 2006, 10:20:04 PM
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "Anna"
.
Does anyone else ever get that sinking feeling that maybe all these
docs are being released because they are going to you-know-what the case?   :(


To be honest, (am sorry if my call is negative), realistically, after wirnessing all we here have observed, I have not held out any hope of Lady Justice presiding on Aruba at this point in Time.  Arubs is in severe distress...The truth will out, however, I feel certain.


The truth is outting, but will justice? I feel downright ill over this.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on August 10, 2006, 10:21:26 PM
And all this from such a delicious boy.... :roll:  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: robots on August 10, 2006, 10:21:32 PM
where is FAT MOUTH JOE TACOPINA ???

didnt he say
JORAN is DELICIOUS


 :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on August 10, 2006, 10:21:39 PM
Quote from: "Frijole"
Quote from: "klaasend"
I just added it to the 6/24 Joran statement thread.  Now I have to read it.


Brace yourself.


You beat me to it...thinking the same.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on August 10, 2006, 10:22:15 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
I just added it to the 6/24 Joran statement thread.  Now I have to read it.

Get the barf bag ready.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: robots on August 10, 2006, 10:24:06 PM
i wonder is PAULUS the SCAULUS and ANITA like having this out
in the open NOW....



hmmmmmmmmm...my guess is they will be GOING on VACATION soon  :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: igsigs on August 10, 2006, 10:24:29 PM
Klaas  :arrow:  Have you seen these. Another site describes it as arguments between J2K...

http://www.vkmag.com/media/holloway telefoon1.jpg

...2.jpg

...3.jpg

...4.jpg


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: San on August 10, 2006, 10:24:32 PM
FROM JORAN'S STATEMENT:

When we arrived at my appartement the 4 of us went inside the appartement. Chato had a hip flask containing whiskey. Chato and Karen drank from the contents. I have to say that I am not sure any more if "Freddy ZEDAN" or "Fernando VIANA" was in the appartement with us.

They went to his apartment to film a movie that was sold around the island.  They drugged the girl.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Frijole on August 10, 2006, 10:25:07 PM
Quote from: "Shell"
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "Anna"
.
Does anyone else ever get that sinking feeling that maybe all these
docs are being released because they are going to you-know-what the case?   :(


To be honest, (am sorry if my call is negative), realistically, after wirnessing all we here have observed, I have not held out any hope of Lady Justice presiding on Aruba at this point in Time.  Arubs is in severe distress...The truth will out, however, I feel certain.


The truth is outting, but will justice? I feel downright ill over this.


My opinion is that these documents are surfacing because without them being known nothing will happen.  There is so much there --- it is hard to fathom anyone ignoring them.

And frankly, if Aruba continues to be stubborn and ignore... then when these all get printed in a nice book or 2, and made into a 7 day mini series and a movie ---- well, then they can call their rock Alcatraz cuz that'll be all it's good for... Venezuela can send their prisoners to Aruba.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on August 10, 2006, 10:25:48 PM
My thoughts after reading all this stuff:


Joran=guilty!!

Deepak=guilty by association!!!  Knows what happened.

Satish=guilty by association!!!  Knows what happened.


No one is gonna pay for this crime.

Case Closed.  

Time for the FBI......bring it on!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on August 10, 2006, 10:27:26 PM
Quote from: "Frijole"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
So, now we know Stephi's last name. I think it is a mis-spelling. Wasn't there an Albert B questioned at the same time as GVC ?
ALBERT BOEKHOUDT ?

.
I just was at work and then the dentist. I am out of it.
.
Alot of things, like Joran's young girlfriend ...12 years old ! !
that we heard about before seem to be true and confirmed...what's next ! !
So, Joe T was hired to rehabilitate this guy's reputation ! ! Because he is an honor student y'know ! !


Great catch Kat!  You aren't out of it at all.  LOL  So have we ever "Tickled" Albert Boekhoudt?

I have a notebook for such times. I have seen his pics.
I believe he is a friend of Earl Clemencia.
But, I think J2K and his buds are just one of many cliques or PIMPS or gangsta's  on that island. I had to close my Tickle account. It was too tempting to do foolish emails to some K brother.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on August 10, 2006, 10:27:47 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Klaas  :arrow:  Have you seen these. Another site describes it as arguments between J2K...

http://www.vkmag.com/media/holloway telefoon1.jpg

...2.jpg

...3.jpg

...4.jpg


No, can you post the verbage here instead of the link?  I have to work on some more documents right now..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: San on August 10, 2006, 10:28:00 PM
FROM JORAN'S STATEMENT:

To your question whether I had a relationship with a girl name "Rika", I answer you the following. Rika was my girlfriend but we did not have a sexual relationship with each other. We may have done some french kissing but I did not have sexual relations with her because she is twelve (12) years old. Rika's parents found out about our relationship and that is why we stopped the relationship. I do not know Rika's last name.

He does not know the last name of his 12 year old girlfriend. :shock:   He is discusting.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Frijole on August 10, 2006, 10:28:51 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Klaas  :arrow:  Have you seen these. Another site describes it as arguments between J2K...

http://www.vkmag.com/media/holloway telefoon1.jpg

...2.jpg

...3.jpg

...4.jpg


Igs... did you "Go there"?  Yikes... I don't speak Dutch but I think it said something about Holland's Porn Site at the top of it... Shix... think I'll need to run a scan.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Shell on August 10, 2006, 10:29:57 PM
Joran the "golden boy" in Anita's eyes. The boy who spends his days not working, playing in casinos all the time with money taken from his parents, and probably cheating at cards with his dealer friends and pals coming to watch the game in progress, has a built up tolerance for booze, bullies his younger brother, can't manage his anger, and has no respect for authority figures or women...oh what a gem of a son you have Anita and Paulus.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Freebird on August 10, 2006, 10:30:56 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "igsigs"
Klaas  :arrow:  Have you seen these. Another site describes it as arguments between J2K...

http://www.vkmag.com/media/holloway telefoon1.jpg

...2.jpg

...3.jpg

...4.jpg


No, can you post the verbage here instead of the link?  I have to work on some more documents right now..


They are in Dutch.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Ono on August 10, 2006, 10:32:12 PM
Quote from: "Frijole"
Geez -  I wonder why Beth has been so insistent that these boys are guilty?

I wonder why Jug made the comment he did about shocking the world?

And these people made Dave dig for his own daughter in a landfill?  And made Beth apologise to Deepak and Satish?  

And Greta is inclined to believe this sexual deviant?


Words escape me for the moment..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on August 10, 2006, 10:33:11 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "igsigs"
Klaas  :arrow:  Have you seen these. Another site describes it as arguments between J2K...

http://www.vkmag.com/media/holloway telefoon1.jpg

...2.jpg

...3.jpg

...4.jpg


No, can you post the verbage here instead of the link?  I have to work on some more documents right now..

Holy Moley ! ! !  More ! !  
I would like to see these as an insertin a newspaper in Aruba. In Dutch.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on August 10, 2006, 10:34:27 PM
I am thoroughly disgusted!!!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Frijole on August 10, 2006, 10:35:35 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "igsigs"
Klaas  :arrow:  Have you seen these. Another site describes it as arguments between J2K...

http://www.vkmag.com/media/holloway telefoon1.jpg

...2.jpg

...3.jpg

...4.jpg


No, can you post the verbage here instead of the link?  I have to work on some more documents right now..

Holy Moley ! ! !  More ! !  
I would like to see these as an insertin a newspaper in Aruba. In Dutch.


CAUTION I MAY BE WRONG BUT I THINK THIS IS A PORN SITE... IT SAYS HOLLANDS' HARD SITE AT THE TOP AND LINKS TO A MAGAZINE.... I THINK IT IS A BAD JOKE FROM ANOTHER SITE....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: San on August 10, 2006, 10:36:11 PM
Joe Tacopina must be so proud of himself right now.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on August 10, 2006, 10:36:58 PM
Quote from: "San"
FROM JORAN'S STATEMENT:

To your question whether I had a relationship with a girl name "Rika", I answer you the following. Rika was my girlfriend but we did not have a sexual relationship with each other. We may have done some french kissing but I did not have sexual relations with her because she is twelve (12) years old. Rika's parents found out about our relationship and that is why we stopped the relationship. I do not know Rika's last name.

He does not know the last name of his 12 year old girlfriend. :shock:   He is discusting.


I guess there really is such a thing as Wham! Bam! Thank you ma'am. With such quickie relationships no wonder they don't know anybody's last name on that island.  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on August 10, 2006, 10:37:01 PM
Thanks for the warning Beans.... I am on my sons puter tonight....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: robots on August 10, 2006, 10:37:48 PM
JOE "THE LOAD of BULL" TACO  :lol:  :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: igsigs on August 10, 2006, 10:37:58 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "igsigs"
Klaas  :arrow:  Have you seen these. Another site describes it as arguments between J2K...

http://www.vkmag.com/media/holloway telefoon1.jpg

...2.jpg

...3.jpg

...4.jpg


No, can you post the verbage here instead of the link?  I have to work on some more documents right now..

Bunch of Dutch stuff...

Maybe i can get the link right this time...

http://www.vkmag.com/media/holloway_telefoon1.jpg

http://www.vkmag.com/media/holloway_telefoon2.jpg

http://www.vkmag.com/media/holloway_telefoon3.jpg

http://www.vkmag.com/media/holloway_telefoon4.jpg


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: San on August 10, 2006, 10:38:41 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "San"
FROM JORAN'S STATEMENT:

To your question whether I had a relationship with a girl name "Rika", I answer you the following. Rika was my girlfriend but we did not have a sexual relationship with each other. We may have done some french kissing but I did not have sexual relations with her because she is twelve (12) years old. Rika's parents found out about our relationship and that is why we stopped the relationship. I do not know Rika's last name.

He does not know the last name of his 12 year old girlfriend. :shock:   He is discusting.


I guess there really is such a thing as Wham! Bam! Thank you ma'am. With such quickie relationships no wonder they don't know anybody's last name on that island.  :roll:

Well according to his other statement Paulus has a bad memory.  I wonder if he realized he married Anita.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on August 10, 2006, 10:42:31 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "San"
FROM JORAN'S STATEMENT:

To your question whether I had a relationship with a girl name "Rika", I answer you the following. Rika was my girlfriend but we did not have a sexual relationship with each other. We may have done some french kissing but I did not have sexual relations with her because she is twelve (12) years old. Rika's parents found out about our relationship and that is why we stopped the relationship. I do not know Rika's last name.

He does not know the last name of his 12 year old girlfriend. :shock:   He is discusting.


I guess there really is such a thing as Wham! Bam! Thank you ma'am. With such quickie relationships no wonder they don't know anybody's last name on that island.  :roll:

Well according to his other statement Paulus has a bad memory.  I wonder if he realized he married Anita.


Clean up on monitor 3!!  Clean up on monitor 3!! :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Frijole on August 10, 2006, 10:42:39 PM
Quote from: "San"
Joe Tacopina must be so proud of himself right now.


San,  I don't think Joe Taco gives a rats' you know what cuz he already cashed the check.  Case cold.  He did his "job" and "won".  That's all he cares about.  He is as bad as Joran.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on August 10, 2006, 10:44:22 PM
Just as a matter of clarification for me, who is this John Charles CROES that Deepak keeps referring to?  Any relation to cell phone Croes? TIA


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: sb on August 10, 2006, 10:45:26 PM
I am wondering if we don't have kind of a "good cop-bad cop" thing happening here. Some posters who know the island say there is a strong DIVISION within the polis over Natalee, and that SOME want Joran punished because they know the truth.

I think that faction may be leaking info to try to keep the case going.

Apart from that, I don't want to speculate how all this is coming to light, although I have ideas.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on August 10, 2006, 10:46:04 PM
LaLas,,   Huggin NEMO for you.....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: igsigs on August 10, 2006, 10:46:05 PM
Frijole - hope i didn't link porn.

One part appears to be the "police car" tapes.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Ono on August 10, 2006, 10:46:14 PM
Quote from: "Shell"
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "Anna"
.
Does anyone else ever get that sinking feeling that maybe all these
docs are being released because they are going to you-know-what the case?   :(


To be honest, (am sorry if my call is negative), realistically, after wirnessing all we here have observed, I have not held out any hope of Lady Justice presiding on Aruba at this point in Time.  Arubs is in severe distress...The truth will out, however, I feel certain.


The truth is outting, but will justice? I feel downright ill over this.


I, too, feel quite ill.  Well, one thing is sure and that is these deviants will wear a millstone around their necks forever amongst good & decent society: their names are mud...their reputations are ruined and their paths are dark and hopeless.  Joran is a sporter, alright....he is a sportsex champion devoid of morals.  Can we say: predator? No conscience.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Frijole on August 10, 2006, 10:48:16 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Frijole - hope i didn't link porn.

One part appears to be the "police car" tapes.
:lol:  :lol:  :lol:

Since I had already hit on the link I went ahead and checked... looks like statements printed in a magazine.  in Dutch of course.  Don't know if they are the same statements or not... perhaps  the site that posted them will translate?  Strange that they are in PRINT somewhere already.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on August 10, 2006, 10:48:34 PM
This is from Deepak's statement.

To your question about the day that myself, Satish and Joran went for a walk at the "Raquet Club" and who had observed this, I can say the following. Koen and Guido certainly saw us. Sander may have seen us, I am unsure about that.

To your question as to what route we walked, I can say the following. We walked around the before mentioned club.

To your question as to how long we walked, I can say the following. It lasted about 5 to 6 minutes. .

To your question as to what the topic was of the conversation, I can say the following. The conversation was about the route, the "Holiday Inn" route and whether or not we could become suspects.
So, they were walking around the club. were they looking for things they might have left behind ? Why don't those Dumb - Asp polis follow Up ?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on August 10, 2006, 10:50:19 PM
From Deepak's June 13, statement:
At some given moment in time a tourist who was sitting at Joran's table got angry. The tourist thought that we were looking at the cards of other players and signaling/deciding for Joran when he should play or not. It lead to a disagreement between Joran and the tourist. The manager of the Radisson Casino came over and everything calmed down. I drank about four "whisky coke" gedronken in the Radisson Casino. I now that Joran drank more because the waiters were constantly bringing him drinks .I am not sure .what he was drinking. His drinks were of a yellow colour. I think it was “whisky soda" or 'Whisky water". [/b]

And this kid is only 17 years old!!  With this type of complicity no wonder this case is in shambles.  No one on that island has the guts to cross this kid.  Give me a break! :roll:  :roll:  :x


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Frijole on August 10, 2006, 10:50:34 PM
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "Shell"
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "Anna"
.
Does anyone else ever get that sinking feeling that maybe all these
docs are being released because they are going to you-know-what the case?   :(


To be honest, (am sorry if my call is negative), realistically, after wirnessing all we here have observed, I have not held out any hope of Lady Justice presiding on Aruba at this point in Time.  Arubs is in severe distress...The truth will out, however, I feel certain.


The truth is outting, but will justice? I feel downright ill over this.


I, too, feel quite ill.  Well, one thing is sure and that is these deviants will wear a millstone around their necks forever amongst good & decent society: their names are mud...their reputations are ruined and their paths are dark and hopeless.  Joran is a sporter, alright....he is a sportsex champion devoid of morals.  Can we say: predator? No conscience.


That's how I feel Ono.  If we gain nothing else - we can only hope that every decent girl on the planet and their parents know what a total freak Joran is.  May he never have a date again!

His own words.  He buried himself.  He's too arrogant to realize it yet... but his life will NEVER be normal.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Ono on August 10, 2006, 10:53:29 PM
Quote from: "San"
FROM JORAN'S STATEMENT:

When we arrived at my appartement the 4 of us went inside the appartement. Chato had a hip flask containing whiskey. Chato and Karen drank from the contents. I have to say that I am not sure any more if "Freddy ZEDAN" or "Fernando VIANA" was in the appartement with us.

They went to his apartment to film a movie that was sold around the island.  They drugged the girl.


He/they must have become so proficient at this routine they decided to become entrepreneurs....most on the island must know about this little business....Is this what Charles Croes was alluding to with his mysterious writing on that Aruban website, and then later when Natalee was kidnapped?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: igsigs on August 10, 2006, 10:54:41 PM
Quote from: "Frijole"
Quote from: "igsigs"
Frijole - hope i didn't link porn.

One part appears to be the "police car" tapes.
:lol:  :lol:  :lol:

Since I had already hit on the link I went ahead and checked... looks like statements printed in a magazine.  in Dutch of course.  Don't know if they are the same statements or not... perhaps  the site that posted them will translate?  Strange that they are in PRINT somewhere already.


I just never had a response to one of my posts like that :!:

WARNING  WARNING WARNING  

I felt like Homer Simpson manning the controls at the Nuclear Plant :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on August 10, 2006, 10:54:55 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
So, now we know Stephi's last name. I think it is a mis-spelling. Wasn't there an Albert B questioned at the same time as GVC ?
ALBERT BOEKHOUDT ?
.
I just was at work and then the dentist. I am out of it.
.
Alot of things, like Joran's young girlfriend ...12 years old ! !
that we heard about before seem to be true and confirmed...what's next ! !
So, Joe T was hired to rehabilitate this guy's reputation ! ! Because he is an honor student y'know ! !


I found her site and the name was spelled Boekhouwer.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on August 10, 2006, 10:55:24 PM
From Deepak's June 13 statement:
After that Joran said to me: “Hey, look. If the police asks about it then we will just say we went away with the girl from Carlos & Charlies, that we did a bit of a road-trip, that he kissed and fingered her, that she fell asleep in the car, that we dropped her off at the Holiday Inn, that she had fallen down, that he had helped her up and that she walked off”. I said to Joran that it was OK, it was fine. Joran than said to me, let's go home. We then drove from the Wyndham Hotel to Joran's house.

What happened to the story around the pool?  I don't think there was a pool in that car.   And why the need to mention her falling again???  They injured her and know that at the time her body was recoverable.  I could have gotten a confession out of them at this point...oh wait!  Maybe not, I don't eat corn flakes! :roll:  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on August 10, 2006, 10:56:05 PM
His own words. He buried himself. He's too arrogant to realize it yet... but his life will NEVER be normal.

Never was... he has been out of control for a long time and his parents have just enabled him turn from a spoiled tantrum throwing brat to a grown up spoiled tantrum throwing .............. can't type the word, but you can fill in your choice of curses. They made him the man ( he is now 19 ) he is today.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Ono on August 10, 2006, 10:56:47 PM
Quote from: "San"
FROM JORAN'S STATEMENT:

To your question whether I had a relationship with a girl name "Rika", I answer you the following. Rika was my girlfriend but we did not have a sexual relationship with each other. We may have done some french kissing but I did not have sexual relations with her because she is twelve (12) years old. Rika's parents found out about our relationship and that is why we stopped the relationship. I do not know Rika's last name.

He does not know the last name of his 12 year old girlfriend. :shock:   He is discusting.


And I'll bet they had sex...he reminds me of Bill Clinton.  I bet her parents had a cow.  Didn't they move away?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: San on August 10, 2006, 10:57:08 PM
FROM Jaime Carrasquilia Caceres Statement 6/17/05:

To your question whether Joran wanted me to keep something for him, I can state the following. Joran had not given me anything that I should keep for him.

The police are looking for something what are they looking for?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Frijole on August 10, 2006, 10:57:15 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "Frijole"
Quote from: "igsigs"
Frijole - hope i didn't link porn.

One part appears to be the "police car" tapes.
:lol:  :lol:  :lol:

Since I had already hit on the link I went ahead and checked... looks like statements printed in a magazine.  in Dutch of course.  Don't know if they are the same statements or not... perhaps  the site that posted them will translate?  Strange that they are in PRINT somewhere already.


I just never had a response to one of my posts like that :!:

WARNING  WARNING WARNING  

I felt like Homer Simpson manning the controls at the Nuclear Plant :lol:


Well, I linked to it without even thinking because I trust you so much!!!  Then I saw Holland's Hard Porn Site and about crapped my pants... Who knows what the dang thing is... but it does appear to be statements.

Sorry - I didn't want anyone to get zapped by the porn police. lol


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on August 10, 2006, 10:57:27 PM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
So, now we know Stephi's last name. I think it is a mis-spelling. Wasn't there an Albert B questioned at the same time as GVC ?
ALBERT BOEKHOUDT ?
.
I just was at work and then the dentist. I am out of it.
.
Alot of things, like Joran's young girlfriend ...12 years old ! !
that we heard about before seem to be true and confirmed...what's next ! !
So, Joe T was hired to rehabilitate this guy's reputation ! ! Because he is an honor student y'know ! !


I found her site and the name was spelled Boekhouwer.

me mistaken... do you have a link ?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on August 10, 2006, 10:57:33 PM
Quote from: "San"
FROM JORAN'S STATEMENT:

When we arrived at my appartement the 4 of us went inside the appartement. Chato had a hip flask containing whiskey. Chato and Karen drank from the contents. I have to say that I am not sure any more if "Freddy ZEDAN" or "Fernando VIANA" was in the appartement with us.

They went to his apartment to film a movie that was sold around the island.  They drugged the girl.


Yeah, who's Fernando Viana?  Where did he come from?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on August 10, 2006, 10:58:56 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
This is from Deepak's statement.

To your question about the day that myself, Satish and Joran went for a walk at the "Raquet Club" and who had observed this, I can say the following. Koen and Guido certainly saw us. Sander may have seen us, I am unsure about that.

To your question as to what route we walked, I can say the following. We walked around the before mentioned club.

To your question as to how long we walked, I can say the following. It lasted about 5 to 6 minutes. .

To your question as to what the topic was of the conversation, I can say the following. The conversation was about the route, the "Holiday Inn" route and whether or not we could become suspects.
So, they were walking around the club. were they looking for things they might have left behind ? Why don't those Dumb - Asp polis follow Up ?



And what did they wonder they would become suspected of????


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Frijole on August 10, 2006, 10:59:13 PM
Quote from: "San"
FROM Jaime Carrasquilia Caceres Statement 6/17/05:

To your question whether Joran wanted me to keep something for him, I can state the following. Joran had not given me anything that I should keep for him.

The police are looking for something what are they looking for?


San, did you get that here or at BFN?  I just saw more statements from joran there plus Jaime's... Man, it's hard to keep up.  Feast or famine.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Ono on August 10, 2006, 10:59:17 PM
Quote from: "Shell"
Joran the "golden boy" in Anita's eyes. The boy who spends his days not working, playing in casinos all the time with money taken from his parents, and probably cheating at cards with his dealer friends and pals coming to watch the game in progress, has a built up tolerance for booze, bullies his younger brother, can't manage his anger, and has no respect for authority figures or women...oh what a gem of a son you have Anita and Paulus.


They all sicken me.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: San on August 10, 2006, 10:59:58 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
His own words. He buried himself. He's too arrogant to realize it yet... but his life will NEVER be normal.

Never was... he has been out of control for a long time and his parents have just enabled him turn from a spoiled tantrum throwing brat to a grown up spoiled tantrum throwing .............. can't type the word, but you can fill in your choice of curses. They made him the man ( he is now 19 ) he is today.

Well according to Paulus when he was on one of the morning shows "Joran has changed he is not the same person".  Oh really then we must have been looking at his twin the past couple of weeks.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: San on August 10, 2006, 11:00:45 PM
Quote from: "Frijole"
Quote from: "San"
FROM Jaime Carrasquilia Caceres Statement 6/17/05:

To your question whether Joran wanted me to keep something for him, I can state the following. Joran had not given me anything that I should keep for him.

The police are looking for something what are they looking for?


San, did you get that here or at BFN?  I just saw more statements from joran there plus Jaime's... Man, it's hard to keep up.  Feast or famine.

Yes I did Frijole.  I can't keep up.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Ono on August 10, 2006, 11:01:00 PM
Quote from: "Frijole"
Quote from: "Shell"
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "Anna"
.
Does anyone else ever get that sinking feeling that maybe all these
docs are being released because they are going to you-know-what the case?   :(


To be honest, (am sorry if my call is negative), realistically, after wirnessing all we here have observed, I have not held out any hope of Lady Justice presiding on Aruba at this point in Time.  Arubs is in severe distress...The truth will out, however, I feel certain.


The truth is outting, but will justice? I feel downright ill over this.


My opinion is that these documents are surfacing because without them being known nothing will happen.  There is so much there --- it is hard to fathom anyone ignoring them.

And frankly, if Aruba continues to be stubborn and ignore... then when these all get printed in a nice book or 2, and made into a 7 day mini series and a movie ---- well, then they can call their rock Alcatraz cuz that'll be all it's good for... Venezuela can send their prisoners to Aruba.


And their garbage...what a perfect landfill for Venezuela...all that space.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Frijole on August 10, 2006, 11:01:40 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
His own words. He buried himself. He's too arrogant to realize it yet... but his life will NEVER be normal.

Never was... he has been out of control for a long time and his parents have just enabled him turn from a spoiled tantrum throwing brat to a grown up spoiled tantrum throwing .............. can't type the word, but you can fill in your choice of curses. They made him the man ( he is now 19 ) he is today.

Well according to Paulus when he was on one of the morning shows "Joran has changed he is not the same person".  Oh really then we must have been looking at his twin the past couple of weeks.


San, that must be what Joran meant when he said his father had a bad memory... lol  He can't remember enough to figure out that his son is lying his brains out to his own face.  So, he really doesn't know his son.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Ono on August 10, 2006, 11:04:09 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "San"
FROM JORAN'S STATEMENT:

To your question whether I had a relationship with a girl name "Rika", I answer you the following. Rika was my girlfriend but we did not have a sexual relationship with each other. We may have done some french kissing but I did not have sexual relations with her because she is twelve (12) years old. Rika's parents found out about our relationship and that is why we stopped the relationship. I do not know Rika's last name.

He does not know the last name of his 12 year old girlfriend. :shock:   He is discusting.


I guess there really is such a thing as Wham! Bam! Thank you ma'am. With such quickie relationships no wonder they don't know anybody's last name on that island.  :roll:

Well according to his other statement Paulus has a bad memory.  I wonder if he realized he married Anita.


LOL!  :lol:  Who IS that woman anyway ??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Sue on August 10, 2006, 11:04:34 PM
WHat I am wondering is where all these statements are coming from
and who is leaking them  kinda makes you curious


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on August 10, 2006, 11:06:24 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
So, now we know Stephi's last name. I think it is a mis-spelling. Wasn't there an Albert B questioned at the same time as GVC ?
ALBERT BOEKHOUDT ?
.
I just was at work and then the dentist. I am out of it.
.
Alot of things, like Joran's young girlfriend ...12 years old ! !
that we heard about before seem to be true and confirmed...what's next ! !
So, Joe T was hired to rehabilitate this guy's reputation ! ! Because he is an honor student y'know ! !


I found her site and the name was spelled Boekhouwer.

me mistaken... do you have a link ?


http://www.blogger.com/profile/5250413

Sorry, posted too quickly..afterthought...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Ono on August 10, 2006, 11:08:24 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
This is from Deepak's statement.

To your question about the day that myself, Satish and Joran went for a walk at the "Raquet Club" and who had observed this, I can say the following. Koen and Guido certainly saw us. Sander may have seen us, I am unsure about that.

To your question as to what route we walked, I can say the following. We walked around the before mentioned club.

To your question as to how long we walked, I can say the following. It lasted about 5 to 6 minutes. .

To your question as to what the topic was of the conversation, I can say the following. The conversation was about the route, the "Holiday Inn" route and whether or not we could become suspects.
So, they were walking around the club. were they looking for things they might have left behind ? Why don't those Dumb - Asp polis follow Up ?


That was so totally weird ( among other statements )...either hatching alibis, searching for incriminating evidence, or holding hands.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Shell on August 10, 2006, 11:08:29 PM
Ladies and Gentlemen, this is not the first, nor the last time this type of crime has happened, spiking a drink and offering to a young lady, video playing on a dvd of porn, and a sexual assault of the young lady with others present. These are sad days, and this can happen anywhere. I have to leave for a while.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on August 10, 2006, 11:08:31 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "San"
FROM JORAN'S STATEMENT:

To your question whether I had a relationship with a girl name "Rika", I answer you the following. Rika was my girlfriend but we did not have a sexual relationship with each other. We may have done some french kissing but I did not have sexual relations with her because she is twelve (12) years old. Rika's parents found out about our relationship and that is why we stopped the relationship. I do not know Rika's last name.

He does not know the last name of his 12 year old girlfriend. :shock:   He is discusting.


I guess there really is such a thing as Wham! Bam! Thank you ma'am. With such quickie relationships no wonder they don't know anybody's last name on that island.  :roll:


I don't think they are girlfriends in the sense that we use the term in the USA.  In one of Deepak's statements he talks about Natalee being Joran's girlfriend.  I think if they kiss or spend 5 minutes together they call them girlfriends.   :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: robots on August 10, 2006, 11:10:57 PM
i have a friend that just registered about 14 DOMAIN NAMES

LOL, ARUBA is gonna be TICKED OFF


the SITES will explain things nicely, i think, at least according to my friend  :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Ono on August 10, 2006, 11:13:58 PM
Quote from: "San"
FROM Jaime Carrasquilia Caceres Statement 6/17/05:

To your question whether Joran wanted me to keep something for him, I can state the following. Joran had not given me anything that I should keep for him.

The police are looking for something what are they looking for?


The belt? The shoes? I'll have to go read...haven't seen this statement yet....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on August 10, 2006, 11:14:27 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
From Deepak's June 13, statement:
At some given moment in time a tourist who was sitting at Joran's table got angry. The tourist thought that we were looking at the cards of other players and signaling/deciding for Joran when he should play or not. It lead to a disagreement between Joran and the tourist. The manager of the Radisson Casino came over and everything calmed down. I drank about four "whisky coke" gedronken in the Radisson Casino. I now that Joran drank more because the waiters were constantly bringing him drinks .I am not sure .what he was drinking. His drinks were of a yellow colour. I think it was “whisky soda" or 'Whisky water". [/b]

And this kid is only 17 years old!!  With this type of complicity no wonder this case is in shambles.  No one on that island has the guts to cross this kid.  Give me a break! :roll:  :roll:  :x


Didn't Joran have school again the next day?  Why was Joran drinking so heavily that night - something on his mind he was trying to forget? Or was he getting drunk to go do something he didn't look forward to doing?  He had to be drunk when Beth first saw him then if he was drinking like crazy at the Radisson.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Ono on August 10, 2006, 11:15:52 PM
Quote from: "Frijole"
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "Frijole"
Quote from: "igsigs"
Frijole - hope i didn't link porn.

One part appears to be the "police car" tapes.
:lol:  :lol:  :lol:

Since I had already hit on the link I went ahead and checked... looks like statements printed in a magazine.  in Dutch of course.  Don't know if they are the same statements or not... perhaps  the site that posted them will translate?  Strange that they are in PRINT somewhere already.


I just never had a response to one of my posts like that :!:

WARNING  WARNING WARNING  

I felt like Homer Simpson manning the controls at the Nuclear Plant :lol:


Well, I linked to it without even thinking because I trust you so much!!!  Then I saw Holland's Hard Porn Site and about crapped my pants... Who knows what the dang thing is... but it does appear to be statements.

Sorry - I didn't want anyone to get zapped by the porn police. lol


 :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: BIGORANGECRUSH on August 10, 2006, 11:17:02 PM
BOC on a sweep! No Aruba Sales here!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on August 10, 2006, 11:17:21 PM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
So, now we know Stephi's last name. I think it is a mis-spelling. Wasn't there an Albert B questioned at the same time as GVC ?
ALBERT BOEKHOUDT ?
.
I just was at work and then the dentist. I am out of it.
.
Alot of things, like Joran's young girlfriend ...12 years old ! !
that we heard about before seem to be true and confirmed...what's next ! !
So, Joe T was hired to rehabilitate this guy's reputation ! ! Because he is an honor student y'know ! !


I found her site and the name was spelled Boekhouwer.

me mistaken... do you have a link ?


http://www.blogger.com/profile/5250413

Sorry, posted too quickly..afterthought...

This Step is a different one than Loco Steph.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Ono on August 10, 2006, 11:18:22 PM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Quote from: "San"
FROM JORAN'S STATEMENT:

When we arrived at my appartement the 4 of us went inside the appartement. Chato had a hip flask containing whiskey. Chato and Karen drank from the contents. I have to say that I am not sure any more if "Freddy ZEDAN" or "Fernando VIANA" was in the appartement with us.

They went to his apartment to film a movie that was sold around the island.  They drugged the girl.


Yeah, who's Fernando Viana?  Where did he come from?


I swear...it's like a virus...they're everywhere.  :shock:  WHO are all these people?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: San on August 10, 2006, 11:18:31 PM
Joran's statement from 6/24 as posted on BFN:

To your question whether I know the girl named "Stephany BOEKHOUWER", I answer you the following. This year, I don't remember the exact date, Freddy, Jaime and me went to a "Houseparty" in Oranjestad. We drove in Jaime's car to the houseparty. The car of Jaime is famous because we had experienced a lot of things in Jaime's car. Jaime has a 4-door green "Honda". On that day Freddy had sex with Stephany BOEKHOUWER on the backseat of Jaime's car. I gave Freddy a condom before he had sex with Stephany. While Freddy was having sex with Stephany on the backseat, Jaime and myself stood down at the trunk of the car and drank alcoholic beverages.

From Jamie's Satement:

To your question whether I know a Spanish speaking girl named "Stephanie", I answer you affermative. She is a Columbian girl and according to me she is the girlfriend of Joran. According to me Stephanie lives in the hamlet of Moko but I do not know the number of her house.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: robots on August 10, 2006, 11:19:03 PM
PAULUS you must be PROUD


and ANITA, youre DELICIOUS SON is GROSS :evil:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on August 10, 2006, 11:20:16 PM
From Deepak's June 13 statement:
At approximately 02:40 uur, we had arrived at his house, but no-one was there. Joran phoned his father. The father had left with the police to meet with us at the Wyndham. Joran's father told him to stay at the house and that he was going to come back to the house now. I had turned up the volume of the music in my car to loud. At some point the woman that lives next door to Joran came out and called Joran over to her. The neighbor told Joran to turn the volume down of the music, she had a baby in the house and the music was too loud. Joran came over to me and told me to turn the volume down. Then borrowed Joran's phone and called Satish. I told Satish what Joran had told me. The conversation lasted about 3 to 4 minutes.

So I thought Miko was home alone...okay, where does this woman live and has she been questioned by the ALE? You know, things like, do you ever see Joran leave his house late at night?  Does he usually leave with Deepak?  Have you ever heard Deepak's loud muffler?  Do you have any idea if Paulus had been home during the last week of May?  Did you see any of Joran's brothers with him during this weeK?  Does Anita often go away and the daddy play?  Okay, I will be good. Just one more thing, I am beginning to think Deepak needs a hearing aid with all this loud music.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Ono on August 10, 2006, 11:21:50 PM
Quote from: "BIGORANGECRUSH"
BOC on a sweep! No Aruba Sales here!!!


Thank goodness!  It's one dangerous place.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on August 10, 2006, 11:24:49 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
So, now we know Stephi's last name. I think it is a mis-spelling. Wasn't there an Albert B questioned at the same time as GVC ?
ALBERT BOEKHOUDT ?
.
I just was at work and then the dentist. I am out of it.
.
Alot of things, like Joran's young girlfriend ...12 years old ! !
that we heard about before seem to be true and confirmed...what's next ! !
So, Joe T was hired to rehabilitate this guy's reputation ! ! Because he is an honor student y'know ! !


I found her site and the name was spelled Boekhouwer.

me mistaken... do you have a link ?


http://www.blogger.com/profile/5250413

Sorry, posted too quickly..afterthought...

This Step is a different one than Loco Steph.


Yes, my first thought was Loco Steph, then tried the Aruba phonebook and didn't find anything, so I googled....it's a local girl, apparently.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Ono on August 10, 2006, 11:31:02 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
From Deepak's June 13 statement:
At approximately 02:40 uur, we had arrived at his house, but no-one was there. Joran phoned his father. The father had left with the police to meet with us at the Wyndham. Joran's father told him to stay at the house and that he was going to come back to the house now. I had turned up the volume of the music in my car to loud. At some point the woman that lives next door to Joran came out and called Joran over to her. The neighbor told Joran to turn the volume down of the music, she had a baby in the house and the music was too loud. Joran came over to me and told me to turn the volume down. Then borrowed Joran's phone and called Satish. I told Satish what Joran had told me. The conversation lasted about 3 to 4 minutes.

So I thought Miko was home alone...okay, where does this woman live and has she been questioned by the ALE? You know, things like, do you ever see Joran leave his house late at night?  Does he usually leave with Deepak?  Have you ever heard Deepak's loud muffler?  Do you have any idea if Paulus had been home during the last week of May?  Did you see any of Joran's brothers with him during this weeK?  Does Anita often go away and the daddy play?  Okay, I will be good. Just one more thing, I am beginning to think Deepak needs a hearing aid with all this loud music.


There has to be an ulterior motive for all this loud music coming from Deepak's car which seems to take on a life of it's own at odd times...sort of like disguising a girl's cries for help...?  I'm all for a great music system but this music situation in his car is weird..when he could easily turn it down like any normal person would do...he doesn't. It's like his car has a mind of it's own and he can't control it. :?  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: robots on August 10, 2006, 11:35:01 PM
i think the MONKEY SOUND that was heard on the PHONE MESSAGE
was from the RADIO in the K2 KILLER car


shock the monkey- peter gabriel

perhaps


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on August 10, 2006, 11:35:11 PM
I don't know why anyone here is shocked at this stuff... there have been worse speculations and things have been coming out bit by bit.
.
It is surprising to me that the Sloots must have known about these statements and yet had the gall to come to NY to tell their side of the story. And praise J. at the same time.

Aruba would have been aware of the character of these
suspects. And yet they defend them !
.
Pus what did the polis do  ?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on August 10, 2006, 11:39:33 PM
Please excuse all my spelling & English errors.Novocaine and
something else ? I am a chicken baby when it comes to the dentist and
he has to give me king kong size needles for little things.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Sue on August 10, 2006, 11:40:00 PM
maybe Chris  from primetime  should be reading these


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on August 10, 2006, 11:41:21 PM
Quote from: Kat_Gram
I don't know why anyone here is shocked at this stuff... there have been worse speculations and things have been coming out bit by bit.
.
It is surprising to me that the Sloots must have known about these statements and yet had the gall to come to NY to tell their side of the story. And praise J. at the same time.

Aruba would have been aware of the character of these
suspects. And yet they defend them !
.
Pus what did the polis do  ?[/quote]

 :lol:  :lol: Sorry, this made me laugh...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: robots on August 10, 2006, 11:42:02 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Please excuse all my spelling & English errors.Novocaine and
something else ? I am a chicken baby when it comes to the dentist and
he has to give me king kong size needles for little things.


can we call you chicken baby ???? :P  :P  :P  :P


 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on August 10, 2006, 11:42:11 PM
NEW FRONT PAGE POST - Photo's of Joran with his weekend girlfriend while in Aruba.  These photos were sent to us be Celeste:

http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/

Joran Van der Sloot, business as usual … You are Still a Suspect … What’s Good for JVDS is bad for Aruba

ALSO - will be posting a thread with a ROUGH translation of Computer Records in a minute.  


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: robots on August 10, 2006, 11:43:45 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
NEW FRONT PAGE POST - Photo's of Joran with his weekend girlfriend while in Aruba.  These photos were sent to us be Celeste:

http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/

Joran Van der Sloot, business as usual … You are Still a Suspect … What’s Good for JVDS is bad for Aruba

ALSO - will be posting a thread with a ROUGH translation of Computer Records in a minute.  


KLASS ROCKS  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Spock on August 10, 2006, 11:48:33 PM
I have to ask, where are all of these statements coming from? Are they published or leaked?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on August 10, 2006, 11:48:47 PM
Quote from: "San"
Joran's statement from 6/24 as posted on BFN:

To your question whether I know the girl named "Stephany BOEKHOUWER", I answer you the following. This year, I don't remember the exact date, Freddy, Jaime and me went to a "Houseparty" in Oranjestad. We drove in Jaime's car to the houseparty. The car of Jaime is famous because we had experienced a lot of things in Jaime's car. Jaime has a 4-door green "Honda". On that day Freddy had sex with Stephany BOEKHOUWER on the backseat of Jaime's car. I gave Freddy a condom before he had sex with Stephany. While Freddy was having sex with Stephany on the backseat, Jaime and myself stood down at the trunk of the car and drank alcoholic beverages.

From Jamie's Satement:

To your question whether I know a Spanish speaking girl named "Stephanie", I answer you affermative. She is a Columbian girl and according to me she is the girlfriend of Joran. According to me Stephanie lives in the hamlet of Moko but I do not know the number of her house.


Sorry, but I just could not resist this. (my apologies to the Shango/Simian doubters) :wink:

Simian Says: June 27th, 2005 at 11:33 am
Find Aruba. Look for Noord. Look for Montaña. Look for Moko. Let your fingers connect the dots.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on August 10, 2006, 11:50:22 PM
Pus what did the polis do ?[/quote]
Well, that was stupid.
Please insert  an L.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Red on August 10, 2006, 11:51:14 PM
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "klaasend"
NEW FRONT PAGE POST - Photo's of Joran with his weekend girlfriend while in Aruba.  These photos were sent to us be Celeste:

http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/

Joran Van der Sloot, business as usual … You are Still a Suspect … What’s Good for JVDS is bad for Aruba

ALSO - will be posting a thread with a ROUGH translation of Computer Records in a minute.  


KLASS ROCKS  8)


Yes she does ... thanks Klaas


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on August 10, 2006, 11:51:36 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Pus what did the polis do ?

Well, that was stupid.
Please insert  an L.[/quote]

Hey Chicken Baby, I understand your pain...another chicken baby here...waving hand wildly!  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: robots on August 10, 2006, 11:53:30 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Pus what did the polis do ?

Well, that was stupid.
Please insert  an L.


Hey Chicken Baby, I understand your pain...another chicken baby here...waving hand wildly!  :lol:[/quote]

LOL



i am so happy about these statements coming out  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on August 10, 2006, 11:54:06 PM
COMPUTER RECORDS - VDS COMPUTER - ROUGH TRANSLATION

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=196


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on August 10, 2006, 11:56:47 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Pus what did the polis do ?

Well, that was stupid.
Please insert  an L.


Hey Chicken Baby, I understand your pain...another chicken baby here...waving hand wildly!  :lol:[/quote]
And send your kiddos to Dental School. One filling plus bonding over a back tooth... $ 249.99.  Ten minutes work. Tops. I only pay 10 %, insurance pays the rest, but this seems high. And my dentist does not overcharge and does not have really high overhead. He is in the burbs and he owns the building, no hi rise rent. He is also very nice to me and holds my hand sometimes.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on August 10, 2006, 11:56:59 PM
Quote from: "Spock"
I have to ask, where are all of these statements coming from? Are they published or leaked?


Where did BFN get the documents they are posting?  The ones we are posting would be from the same source.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on August 10, 2006, 11:58:24 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Pus what did the polis do ?

Well, that was stupid.
Please insert  an L.


Hey Chicken Baby, I understand your pain...another chicken baby here...waving hand wildly!  :lol:

And send your kiddos to Dental School. One filling plus bonding over a back tooth... $ 249.99.  Ten minutes work. Tops. I only pay 10 %, insurance pays the rest, but this seems high. And my dentist does not overcharge and does not have really high overhead. He is in the burbs and he owns the building, no hi rise rent. He is also very nice to me and holds my hand sometimes.[/quote]

A dentist that holds hands too...hmmmm.... :roll: I may need to make a note of that.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on August 11, 2006, 12:00:47 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
COMPUTER RECORDS - VDS COMPUTER - ROUGH TRANSLATION

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=196


Here are the websites they/Joran went to:


(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/ComputerSites1.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on August 11, 2006, 12:03:05 AM
From Joran's June 24 statement:
that his father suffers from bad memory and that because of that his and his fathers statements would not correspond

- that his father even can't remember what kind of clothes he himself wore the day before


Well, he would have made a fine judge wouldn't he? :roll:  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on August 11, 2006, 12:04:34 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
From Joran's June 24 statement:
that his father suffers from bad memory and that because of that his and his fathers statements would not correspond

- that his father even can't remember what kind of clothes he himself wore the day before


Well, he would have made a fine judge wouldn't he? :roll:  :roll:

Now if that isn't a load of BS.  Maybe Paulus sweat all his brain cells out.  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on August 11, 2006, 12:05:32 AM
Good evening everyone!!  ;)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on August 11, 2006, 12:05:46 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "klaasend"
COMPUTER RECORDS - VDS COMPUTER - ROUGH TRANSLATION

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=196


Here are the websites they/Joran went to:


(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/ComputerSites1.jpg)


So does this mean that Joran was on his computer at these times or did his little brother use his computer also?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: robots on August 11, 2006, 12:06:21 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
From Joran's June 24 statement:
that his father suffers from bad memory and that because of that his and his fathers statements would not correspond

- that his father even can't remember what kind of clothes he himself wore the day before


Well, he would have made a fine judge wouldn't he? :roll:  :roll:

Now if that isn't a load of BS.  Maybe Paulus sweat all his brain cells out.  :roll:


its the BEGINNING of the EXCUSES as to why PAULIS picked JORAN up at 4 AM but cant remember much about it

i can see it now  :evil:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on August 11, 2006, 12:09:22 AM
COMPUTER RECORDS -

Interesting that Paulus googled alcohol & drugs.  Was he looking to see if the combination that Joran gave to Natalee is what killed her?

Alos interesting is that the computer was infected with a virus on May 30.  How convenient for the vdS.  I guess that happened so they could convienetly explain things on their computer - well it must have been the virus that did that.   :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: San on August 11, 2006, 12:10:22 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "San"
Joran's statement from 6/24 as posted on BFN:

To your question whether I know the girl named "Stephany BOEKHOUWER", I answer you the following. This year, I don't remember the exact date, Freddy, Jaime and me went to a "Houseparty" in Oranjestad. We drove in Jaime's car to the houseparty. The car of Jaime is famous because we had experienced a lot of things in Jaime's car. Jaime has a 4-door green "Honda". On that day Freddy had sex with Stephany BOEKHOUWER on the backseat of Jaime's car. I gave Freddy a condom before he had sex with Stephany. While Freddy was having sex with Stephany on the backseat, Jaime and myself stood down at the trunk of the car and drank alcoholic beverages.

From Jamie's Satement:

To your question whether I know a Spanish speaking girl named "Stephanie", I answer you affermative. She is a Columbian girl and according to me she is the girlfriend of Joran. According to me Stephanie lives in the hamlet of Moko but I do not know the number of her house.


Sorry, but I just could not resist this. (my apologies to the Shango/Simian doubters) :wink:

Simian Says: June 27th, 2005 at 11:33 am
Find Aruba. Look for Noord. Look for Montaña. Look for Moko. Let your fingers connect the dots.

I am not a doubter and I like to hear your thoughts.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: robots on August 11, 2006, 12:10:42 AM
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
COMPUTER RECORDS -

Interesting that Paulus googled alcohol & drugs.  Was he looking to see if the combination that Joran gave to Natalee is what killed her?

Alos interesting is that the computer was infected with a virus on May 30.  How convenient for the vdS.  I guess that happened so they could convienetly explain things on their computer - well it must have been the virus that did that.   :shock:


looking for INFO on alcohol and DRUG REACTIONS :evil:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on August 11, 2006, 12:11:49 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
From Joran's June 24 statement:
that his father suffers from bad memory and that because of that his and his fathers statements would not correspond

- that his father even can't remember what kind of clothes he himself wore the day before


Well, he would have made a fine judge wouldn't he? :roll:  :roll:



Well, we know that Joran doesn't have to worry too much about remembering what he wore the day before.... can you say blue plaid shirt???? :roll:  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: robots on August 11, 2006, 12:12:34 AM
Quote from: "cubbeegirl"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
From Joran's June 24 statement:
that his father suffers from bad memory and that because of that his and his fathers statements would not correspond

- that his father even can't remember what kind of clothes he himself wore the day before


Well, he would have made a fine judge wouldn't he? :roll:  :roll:



Well, we know that Joran doesn't have to worry too much about remembering what he wore the day before.... can you say blue plaid shirt???? :roll:  :wink:



 :twisted:  :P  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: robots on August 11, 2006, 12:14:12 AM
www.ARUBAPRODUCTS.COM



 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on August 11, 2006, 12:14:52 AM
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
From Joran's June 24 statement:
that his father suffers from bad memory and that because of that his and his fathers statements would not correspond

- that his father even can't remember what kind of clothes he himself wore the day before


Well, he would have made a fine judge wouldn't he? :roll:  :roll:

Now if that isn't a load of BS.  Maybe Paulus sweat all his brain cells out.  :roll:


its the BEGINNING of the EXCUSES as to why PAULIS picked JORAN up at 4 AM but cant remember much about it

i can see it now  :evil:


Well, this explains a lot. Oops! I did it again.  My apologies. :wink:

Simian Says: June 23rd, 2005 at 3:09 pm
You can’t remember answering a phone call at 2:00 in the morning? When the next day your son was picked up?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on August 11, 2006, 12:14:53 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "klaasend"
COMPUTER RECORDS - VDS COMPUTER - ROUGH TRANSLATION

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=196


Here are the websites they/Joran went to:


(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/ComputerSites1.jpg)


So does this mean that Joran was on his computer at these times or did his little brother use his computer also?


If this was accurate, then Joran was logged into his hotmail at 10:33pm 5/29, then back on 5/30 at 3:35am...brother used it in between...Dad didn't pick him up at 4am at McDonald's if he was logged in before that time...IF is a big word.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on August 11, 2006, 12:16:00 AM
Man, you guys are good!!  You have access to the computer records??  Damn good indeed!!  ;)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on August 11, 2006, 12:16:34 AM
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
COMPUTER RECORDS -

Interesting that Paulus googled alcohol & drugs.  Was he looking to see if the combination that Joran gave to Natalee is what killed her?

Alos interesting is that the computer was infected with a virus on May 30.  How convenient for the vdS.  I guess that happened so they could convienetly explain things on their computer - well it must have been the virus that did that.   :shock:


looking for INFO on alcohol and DRUG REACTIONS :evil:


Does anyone see a BIG RED FLAG here besides me??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on August 11, 2006, 12:16:40 AM
SITES Visited on computer

BACKSEATBANGERS.com

Very interesting.  Didn't Freddy do that girl Stephanie in the backseat?  What were the boys doing at the pond when the gardener saw them?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: robots on August 11, 2006, 12:17:11 AM
so, this computer was WHERE in the HOUSE ????

JORAN PIGS ROOM ???

the living ROOM ???


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on August 11, 2006, 12:17:17 AM
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Man, you guys are good!!  You have access to the computer records??  Damn good indeed!!  ;)


Good evening Thirdstrike!Very interesting reading here ....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: robots on August 11, 2006, 12:17:40 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
COMPUTER RECORDS -

Interesting that Paulus googled alcohol & drugs.  Was he looking to see if the combination that Joran gave to Natalee is what killed her?

Alos interesting is that the computer was infected with a virus on May 30.  How convenient for the vdS.  I guess that happened so they could convienetly explain things on their computer - well it must have been the virus that did that.   :shock:


looking for INFO on alcohol and DRUG REACTIONS :evil:


Does anyone see a BIG RED FLAG here besides me??


IT IS HUGE


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on August 11, 2006, 12:18:33 AM
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
SITES Visited on computer

BACKSEATBANGERS.com

Very interesting.  Didn't Freddy do that girl Stephanie in the backseat?  What were the boys doing at the pond when the gardener saw them?


Right with you here.  I was thinking the same thing.  We are seeing the cards all fall into place.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on August 11, 2006, 12:19:36 AM
Quote from: "robots"
so, this computer was WHERE in the HOUSE ????

JORAN PIGS ROOM ???

the living ROOM ???


So does this mean that there WAS a brother in the house??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on August 11, 2006, 12:19:55 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
SITES Visited on computer

BACKSEATBANGERS.com

Very interesting.  Didn't Freddy do that girl Stephanie in the backseat?  What were the boys doing at the pond when the gardener saw them?


Right with you here.  I was thinking the same thing.  We are seeing the cards all fall into place.



Yes indeed....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: robots on August 11, 2006, 12:20:48 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "robots"
so, this computer was WHERE in the HOUSE ????

JORAN PIGS ROOM ???

the living ROOM ???


So does this mean that there WAS a brother in the house??


i dont know, but didnt K2 say that the APT was never locked
could have been JORANS friend that spent the NIGHT on the computer


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: robots on August 11, 2006, 12:21:44 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "robots"
so, this computer was WHERE in the HOUSE ????

JORAN PIGS ROOM ???

the living ROOM ???


So does this mean that there WAS a brother in the house??


i dont know if they were there or with ASSITA  :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on August 11, 2006, 12:25:33 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
COMPUTER RECORDS -

Interesting that Paulus googled alcohol & drugs.  Was he looking to see if the combination that Joran gave to Natalee is what killed her?

Alos interesting is that the computer was infected with a virus on May 30.  How convenient for the vdS.  I guess that happened so they could convienetly explain things on their computer - well it must have been the virus that did that.   :shock:


looking for INFO on alcohol and DRUG REACTIONS :evil:


Does anyone see a BIG RED FLAG here besides me??


Oh yes, b/c after that he googled Lawyers names!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: San on August 11, 2006, 12:26:27 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "robots"
so, this computer was WHERE in the HOUSE ????

JORAN PIGS ROOM ???

the living ROOM ???


So does this mean that there WAS a brother in the house??

I bet he went under his brothers name to make it look like he was home.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: nonesuche on August 11, 2006, 12:27:39 AM
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
SITES Visited on computer

BACKSEATBANGERS.com

Very interesting.  Didn't Freddy do that girl Stephanie in the backseat?  What were the boys doing at the pond when the gardener saw them?


Sunfreak, backseatbangers is the site along with bangbus.com we researched in the last month or two months perhaps? many posts regarding it - amazing how close to the truth we may have been?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Hotshot on August 11, 2006, 12:28:45 AM
Warning - Adults OnlyThis hardcore reality porn site is a production of Pink Visual Productions.
backseatbangers.com - 6k -


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Spock on August 11, 2006, 12:28:56 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "klaasend"
COMPUTER RECORDS - VDS COMPUTER - ROUGH TRANSLATION

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=196


Here are the websites they/Joran went to:


(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/ComputerSites1.jpg)


So does this mean that Joran was on his computer at these times or did his little brother use his computer also?


This is starting to look more like Joran may have made it home at 3:30 and one of the Kalpoe brothers may have made their way back to the beach area. At least, that is what the computer records and police statements are suggesting I should believe.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: nonesuche on August 11, 2006, 12:29:23 AM
we also finally know why Dompig said these three are "guilty as hell'


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on August 11, 2006, 12:29:47 AM
The monkeys have had this thing solved all along, we just can't seem to get the ALE to listen to us.  It's Joran, stupid ALE, it's Joran!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: robots on August 11, 2006, 12:30:09 AM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
we also finally know why Dompig said these three are "guilty as hell'



yep :evil:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on August 11, 2006, 12:30:24 AM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
SITES Visited on computer

BACKSEATBANGERS.com

Very interesting.  Didn't Freddy do that girl Stephanie in the backseat?  What were the boys doing at the pond when the gardener saw them?


Sunfreak, backseatbangers is the site along with bangbus.com we researched in the last month or two months perhaps? many posts regarding it - amazing how close to the truth we may have been?


I'm not going to go that site again, but I believe Bang Bros does produce that site BackSeatBangers.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on August 11, 2006, 12:31:02 AM
Quote from: "Hotshot"
Warning - Adults OnlyThis hardcore reality porn site is a production of Pink Visual Productions.
backseatbangers.com - 6k -


PINK??  As in Mr. Pink??  BINGO! Another piece of the puzzle.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: nonesuche on August 11, 2006, 12:32:37 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
The monkeys have had this thing solved all along, we just can't seem to get the ALE to listen to us.  It's Joran, stupid ALE, it's Joran!


I'd have to agree Lala's and it also makes me all the more suspect of the timing of RU emerging along with some of our Aruban posters assocation with it. Did you notice same posters disappeared about the time that Paulus was cleared as a suspect? Most did, except for Julia Renfro, the poop scooper.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Hotshot on August 11, 2006, 12:33:19 AM
Quote from: "Hotshot"
Warning - Adults OnlyThis hardcore reality porn site is a production of Pink Visual Productions.
backseatbangers.com - 6k -


216.7.89.24


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on August 11, 2006, 12:33:32 AM
NEW THREAD - JAIME C. 6/17 STATEMENT - Red will be posting this on the front page tomorrow but he said it was OK for me to post in the forum tonight.


http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewforum.php?f=197


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on August 11, 2006, 12:35:55 AM
Quote from: "Hotshot"
Quote from: "Hotshot"
Warning - Adults OnlyThis hardcore reality porn site is a production of Pink Visual Productions.
backseatbangers.com - 6k -


216.7.89.24


Hotshot - I could not find any connection to Paul Brough/Mr. Pink


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on August 11, 2006, 12:36:33 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "Hotshot"
Warning - Adults OnlyThis hardcore reality porn site is a production of Pink Visual Productions.
backseatbangers.com - 6k -


PINK??  As in Mr. Pink??  BINGO! Another piece of the puzzle.


Shango Says: June 26th, 2005 at 9:43 pm
Did the babylonians like to make movies?


My bad, my apologies. Just couldn't resist. :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on August 11, 2006, 12:37:24 AM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
SITES Visited on computer

BACKSEATBANGERS.com

Very interesting.  Didn't Freddy do that girl Stephanie in the backseat?  What were the boys doing at the pond when the gardener saw them?


Sunfreak, backseatbangers is the site along with bangbus.com we researched in the last month or two months perhaps? many posts regarding it - amazing how close to the truth we may have been?



Yeah, and we are the "amateurs"..... :roll:  :roll:  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: nonesuche on August 11, 2006, 12:38:41 AM
Lala's GO FOR IT, you are ENTITLED........shango tango all night long!!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on August 11, 2006, 12:38:49 AM
Quote from: "Hotshot"
Warning - Adults OnlyThis hardcore reality porn site is a production of Pink Visual Productions.
www.backseatbangers.com/ - 6k -


Thanks HotShot.  I went to that site and clicked on the ASACP link and look what I found.

"ASACP Welcome in The Lion’s Den
Los Angeles, CA (August 9, 2006) – The Association of Sites Advocating Child Protection (ASACP) is pleased to announce that The Lion’s Den has become its newest Corporate Sponsor.

The Lion's Den provides adult videos, periodicals, novelties, and intimate apparel through The Lion's Den Adult Superstores and over the internet via www.LionsDenAdult.com . The first Lion’s Den retail outlet opened in 1971 in Columbus, Ohio. Today the chain boasts more than 30 locations around the United States.

"The Lion's Den has been in the forefront of the industry for more than 34 years,” said Lion’s Den CEO Michael Moran. “Not just when it comes to integrity and professionalism, but also leading the way in defending our 1st and 4th amendment rights. We’re proud that our community involvement now includes supporting ASACP’s efforts to protect kids from exploitation, and from adult material.”

According to ASACP Executive Director Joan Irvine, Lion’s Den brings more to the table than just financial support. “We’re already talking about publicizing ASACP’s efforts in the Lion’s Den stores, and about how we can work more closely with ‘brick and mortar’ retailers. It’s great to have new sponsors be so enthusiastic about participating, and so willing to contribute actively to what we do.”

Founded in 1996, the Association of Sites Advocating Child Protection (ASACP) is a non-profit organization dedicated to eliminating child pornography from the Internet. ASACP battles child pornography through its CP reporting hotline, and by organizing the efforts of the online adult industry to combat the heinous crime of child sexual abuse.

Companies and individuals interested in supporting ASACP may go to www.asacp.org for more"

Hmmm...I wonder if there is any connection t the Lion's Den in Aruba & Pink Visual?

No wonder these adult porn sites advocate child protection - it cuts into their viewership!  Ughhh-disgusting!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on August 11, 2006, 12:39:42 AM
PLEASE NO "LIVE" LINKS TO PORN SITES


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on August 11, 2006, 12:41:17 AM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "robots"
so, this computer was WHERE in the HOUSE ????

JORAN PIGS ROOM ???

the living ROOM ???


So does this mean that there WAS a brother in the house??

I bet he went under his brothers name to make it look like he was home.


I had a brainfart earlier, forgetting that the brothers were supposed to be in NL...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on August 11, 2006, 12:42:18 AM
Anybody know where Moko is in Aruba?  Lala's has me trying to connect the dots!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on August 11, 2006, 12:43:37 AM
I need to take a quick shower - will look for Moko when I get done.  Be right back.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Mere on August 11, 2006, 12:47:14 AM
Aruba map....need good eyes  :D

http://www.caribbean-on-line.com/islands/ar/armap.shtml


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on August 11, 2006, 12:47:55 AM
OK...back.  What'd I miss?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Hotshot on August 11, 2006, 12:48:58 AM
OK, this place the lions den sells bangbus movies.  And Moko is behind Jorans, to the notheast I do believe.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on August 11, 2006, 12:50:04 AM
Quote from: "MeMere"
Aruba map....need good eyes  :D

http://www.caribbean-on-line.com/islands/ar/armap.shtml


Thanks, MeMere.  I didn't see Moko on that map...having trouble finding one that shows where it is.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on August 11, 2006, 12:50:06 AM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Lala's GO FOR IT, you are ENTITLED........shango tango all night long!!!!


Uh oh...the "Shango Tango", huh?  I think I'll sit this dance out Lala's...;)

BTW...where's my love?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on August 11, 2006, 12:53:32 AM
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Lala's GO FOR IT, you are ENTITLED........shango tango all night long!!!!


Uh oh...the "Shango Tango", huh?  I think I'll sit this dance out Lala's...;)

BTW...where's my love?


Hi sweetie!  I am just adding a litle spice to the perps statements.  I always save a dance for you.  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: sb on August 11, 2006, 12:59:42 AM
I don't know why but all of a sudden I have a bad feeling about Valentijn in all this.

I am not sure he wasn't playing around on the computer to cover up for his big bud.

I have another concern. Remember WAY back it was stated that Joran used his cellphone at 6:30 AM from the Santa Cruz area? That's NEAR K2's house. Did these yahoos switch cellphones that night?

I am beginning to think that the electronic evidence has been deliberately tampered with by the perps, that they did a lot of Net activity to coverup and confuse the timing of events.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on August 11, 2006, 01:03:04 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Lala's GO FOR IT, you are ENTITLED........shango tango all night long!!!!


Uh oh...the "Shango Tango", huh?  I think I'll sit this dance out Lala's...;)

BTW...where's my love?


Hi sweetie!  I am just adding a litle spice to the perps statements.  I always save a dance for you.  :wink:


That's good to know Lala's!!  Should I put on my dancing shoes??  ;)

Oh, and don't worry...I know you dig the Shango stuff.  Just messin' with you...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Spock on August 11, 2006, 01:03:40 AM
Both Kalpoes deny driving Joran home. Val was on the computer last at 3:07, could he or someone with him gone to pick up Joran?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: sb on August 11, 2006, 01:04:19 AM
I am beginning to think that Joran was last home that night about 2:45, and then may have gone off again somewhere. And that all the net activity is meant to cover for that fact.

Which WOULD indicate that Natalee was taken to VDS house. Earlier. And then taken AWAY from there.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: sb on August 11, 2006, 01:09:29 AM
BTW, what guarantee do we have that the people who did that computer investigation are legit and honest? How do we know they didn't cook up the info in an attempt to confuse the world and try to clear Joran?

I smell a Floyd Landis-style RAT here.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Freebird on August 11, 2006, 01:10:17 AM
I am nearly speechless once again.

Was Paul researching drugs, alcohol and attorneys at 10 p the night after Nat disappeared--before the H/T arrived at his house?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: nonesuche on August 11, 2006, 01:11:09 AM
Quote from: "sb"
BTW, what guarantee do we have that the people who did that computer investigation are legit and honest? How do we know they didn't cook up the info in an attempt to confuse the world and try to clear Joran?

I smell a Floyd Landis-style RAT here.


it's a passle of RATS I do believe, a whole big lot of them !! This is entirely too big for only a few in the ALE to have worked this cover-up, this is MASSIVE.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on August 11, 2006, 01:11:19 AM
Quote from: "Freebird"
I am nearly speechless once again.

Was Paul researching drugs, alcohol and attorneys at 10 p the night after Nat disappeared--before the H/T arrived at his house?



It appears that someone was......


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: robots on August 11, 2006, 01:13:07 AM
the brother was up till  2 34 AM

thats pretty late

not to much of a stretch to think he was up even later and simply used JORAN the PIGS SCREEN for the porn


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: sb on August 11, 2006, 01:13:54 AM
Freebird, that's part of what we're all trying to figure out.

That part seems to indicate that it was PVDS who did so, at 10:00 the next night, and says it was only done for a brief time (which makes no sense to me).

I would think if they were looking for info in the context we are fearing, they would have spend quite a lot of time researching the matter.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Freebird on August 11, 2006, 01:15:11 AM
Quote from: "cubbeegirl"
Quote from: "Freebird"
I am nearly speechless once again.

Was Paul researching drugs, alcohol and attorneys at 10 p the night after Nat disappeared--before the H/T arrived at his house?



It appears that someone was......


Joran was supposedly playing poker or gambling, dont know if that's verified or not.  But the log info shows that in the same session the user was researching stock quotes as well.  Sounds like Paul, and I dont think Joran would be looking into lawyers.  

I feel ill again.  I had about decided Paul was clueless.  And he was just awarded $28k for wrongful detention.  I just dont know what to say.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: robots on August 11, 2006, 01:15:23 AM
Quote from: "robots"
the brother was up till  2 34 AM

thats pretty late

not to much of a stretch to think he was up even later and simply used JORAN the PIGS SCREEN for the porn


CORRECTION

3 30 ish he was up to


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on August 11, 2006, 01:16:02 AM
I could stay here all night reading, but unfortunately need to get up soon.... :shock:
Glad it is Friday so that I can re-read and digest all the info we have been given.
Good night monkeys....
Thanks Red and klaas!!!! You guys rock!!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on August 11, 2006, 01:20:05 AM
Quote from: "MeMere"
Aruba map....need good eyes  :D

http://www.caribbean-on-line.com/islands/ar/armap.shtml


Found this about Moko on the real estate site:

The property (freehold) land is 40.270 m2 (433.305 square feet). In MOKO, quiet area North-western part of the island. Already adjacent to development area with high class housing. Price per square meter US$ 34.30 Excellent opportunity for developers.  

Location: MOKO   Price: US$1,381,261.00  

http://www.arubarealestate.com/search/real.mv

And this:
The Criollo Dogshow, at Moko, Rancho Monte Blanco

http://www.visitaruba.com/facts/newsdesk/backissues/newsletter58.html#story4


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on August 11, 2006, 01:20:06 AM
Quote from: "Spock"
Both Kalpoes deny driving Joran home. Val was on the computer last at 3:07, could he or someone with him gone to pick up Joran?



Simian Says: June 25th, 2005 at 7:41 pm
Kalpoes went home. Joran stayed behind. Somebody had to come get him.

  Ooops!  I did it again.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: nonesuche on August 11, 2006, 01:21:34 AM
Lala's  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

I'm off to bed, hugs to my Lala's.......night everyone. Take care.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on August 11, 2006, 01:25:50 AM
NEW DEEPAK STATEMENT FROM 6/30 as posted at BFN, in this thread:

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=200


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on August 11, 2006, 01:28:02 AM
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
Quote from: "MeMere"
Aruba map....need good eyes  :D

http://www.caribbean-on-line.com/islands/ar/armap.shtml


Found this about Moko on the real estate site:

The property (freehold) land is 40.270 m2 (433.305 square feet). In MOKO, quiet area North-western part of the island. Already adjacent to development area with high class housing. Price per square meter US$ 34.30 Excellent opportunity for developers.  

Location: MOKO   Price: US$1,381,261.00  

http://www.arubarealestate.com/search/real.mv

And this:
The Criollo Dogshow, at Moko, Rancho Monte Blanco

http://www.visitaruba.com/facts/newsdesk/backissues/newsletter58.html#story4


Thanks, SunFreak2...it's a hamlet I believe, so maybe that's why it's so hard to find a map that shows it's exact locale.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Shell on August 11, 2006, 01:28:10 AM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Pus what did the polis do ?

Well, that was stupid.
Please insert  an L.[/quote]

Naw, we liked the word pus, rofl


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on August 11, 2006, 01:30:24 AM
Quote from: "Freebird"
Quote from: "cubbeegirl"
Quote from: "Freebird"
I am nearly speechless once again.

Was Paul researching drugs, alcohol and attorneys at 10 p the night after Nat disappeared--before the H/T arrived at his house?



It appears that someone was......


Joran was supposedly playing poker or gambling, dont know if that's verified or not.  But the log info shows that in the same session the user was researching stock quotes as well.  Sounds like Paul, and I dont think Joran would be looking into lawyers.  

I feel ill again.  I had about decided Paul was clueless.  And he was just awarded $28k for wrongful detention.  I just dont know what to say.


Please tell me you are not serious...did you really think Paulus was clueless in all this?  He's the mastermind behind the cover up.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on August 11, 2006, 01:33:38 AM
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "robots"
the brother was up till  2 34 AM

thats pretty late

not to much of a stretch to think he was up even later and simply used JORAN the PIGS SCREEN for the porn


CORRECTION

3 30 ish he was up to


Joran told Greta he got home between 3:25 AND 3:35.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on August 11, 2006, 01:37:38 AM
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "robots"
the brother was up till  2 34 AM

thats pretty late

not to much of a stretch to think he was up even later and simply used JORAN the PIGS SCREEN for the porn


CORRECTION

3 30 ish he was up to


I went through this earlier, then realized that brothers were supposed to be in NL with Mom... :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Freebird on August 11, 2006, 01:39:14 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "Freebird"
Quote from: "cubbeegirl"
Quote from: "Freebird"
I am nearly speechless once again.

Was Paul researching drugs, alcohol and attorneys at 10 p the night after Nat disappeared--before the H/T arrived at his house?



It appears that someone was......


Joran was supposedly playing poker or gambling, dont know if that's verified or not.  But the log info shows that in the same session the user was researching stock quotes as well.  Sounds like Paul, and I dont think Joran would be looking into lawyers.  

I feel ill again.  I had about decided Paul was clueless.  And he was just awarded $28k for wrongful detention.  I just dont know what to say.


Please tell me you are not serious...did you really think Paulus was clueless in all this?  He's the mastermind behind the cover up.


I am serious.  Initially I thought for certain he was involved.  Gradually, I started believing that he was hoodwinked by Joran.  Now I see I was probably wrong about that.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on August 11, 2006, 01:39:17 AM
Such interesting info we are discussing, but I need to go to bed. G'nite Ya'll.  When I get up in the morning I want to read where the Monkeys solved this case.  It would bring me great pleasure to see some silver jewelry around Joran & Paulus's wrists!!!   :D  :lol:  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on August 11, 2006, 01:40:06 AM
MOKO DAM is just below the bottom right corner of the triangle:


(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/LionsDenVDS5.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on August 11, 2006, 01:40:14 AM
Klaasend, I know you've been overloaded with work.  If you find Moko, I'll look for it tomorrow.  Sunfreak2 found some info.  

G'nite all.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Shell on August 11, 2006, 01:40:14 AM
So this is stuff that KJ presented to the judges, and not only are the 3 set free but Paulus got money? OMG


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on August 11, 2006, 01:43:20 AM
Thanks, Klaas.  We should make a wish!!

Now, connecting the dots, it would seem to be a straight line....Lala's what do you think?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on August 11, 2006, 01:44:21 AM
Quote from: "Shell"
So this is stuff that KJ presented to the judges, and not only are the 3 set free but Paulus got money? OMG


Yep, and to think, there was no evidence either...just blows your mind.  I bet the FBI is laughing their butts off over the ineptness of ALE.  Any fool could have cracked these kids.  I could do it with one hand tied behind my back.  

On that note, I am off to bed.  Hugs to Nemo.  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on August 11, 2006, 01:47:30 AM
I think I'm going to get a book to put Lala's name in...just because we connected dots and she leaves....

 :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on August 11, 2006, 01:50:25 AM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
I think I'm going to get a book to put Lala's name in...just because we connected dots and she leaves....

 :wink:


Now that I see where Moko is I'll try to put together another map.  Probably not until tomorrow though.  On that map I have the VDS residence up a little to high.  It should be below the church.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Shell on August 11, 2006, 01:52:34 AM
Well Greta, I hope your e-meter came with a warranty, I think yours is broken.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on August 11, 2006, 02:11:16 AM
GOODNIGHT ALL!  Try not to go beyond page 50 before I wake up tomorrow, lol  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: KatzHome on August 11, 2006, 03:17:08 AM
Hi Monkeys ~ anyone home?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Anna on August 11, 2006, 03:23:43 AM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
SITES Visited on computer

BACKSEATBANGERS.com

Very interesting.  Didn't Freddy do that girl Stephanie in the backseat?  What were the boys doing at the pond when the gardener saw them?


Sunfreak, backseatbangers is the site along with bangbus.com we researched in the last month or two months perhaps? many posts regarding it - amazing how close to the truth we may have been?



 :shock:  :shock:  :shock:
Just woke up from my nap and everybody is gone!  

Yes, we have been VERY close for some time now.  No wonder our computers are hacked and we get so many hits from Aruba and NL!

And I just happen to remember telling THE BIG HAMMER that they had to use backseatbangers.com because they did not have a bus, ha-ha--was just teasing him if you will recall.  But we knew even then.  We KNEW and how many times have we been RIGHT but told ourselves that surely we were not????  Just how many times in all of this has that happened?  Far too many to count.   :(

You can also become a Lion's Den Distributor and earn LIONDOLLARS!  These can be used to purchase porn or I think even converted into cash but at a lesser rate than if you use it to buy your very on filth and smut.  I can find a link for those interested in participating.   :evil: BUT I WON'T!!

I have to go back and read the last four documents but am already upset!
But better read as I am sure there is a great deal to be learned, just catching up on this thread certainly has me wide awake and I was hoping to go right back to sleep.  

SUNFREAK,
I think Mr Pink sold out his part of the porn business he was in.  When Natalee very first disappeared, if you Googled Aruba which so many of us did, you got sites about Mr. PINK and PORN and the HOLIDAY INN in Aruba.  The first several listings were all about that.   :shock: Think that is why Tyler has always connected the HI in some way.

Oh, I almost dread reading these new documents I have missed but you know I just have to do it!

And it's almost skeery in the cage all alone like this, too.   :?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Anna on August 11, 2006, 03:26:34 AM
.
KATZ,
Are YOU here, too?  I had to rest my eyes earlier and take a break and now four more new documents have been released.

Going to go back and read them if I can stand it.  So hard to believe how close we have been for some time now.

So if you are still here, so am I and you are not alone.

Anna


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: KatzHome on August 11, 2006, 03:30:57 AM
Hi Anna ~ Yeah I am ~ Okies ~ where do I go back reading to?  Any idea?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: justinsmama on August 11, 2006, 04:39:11 AM
Wow, monkeys! Lots of reading to do and lots of info to digest and analyze!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on August 11, 2006, 04:43:16 AM
Quote from: "Freebird"
I am nearly speechless once again.

Was Paul researching drugs, alcohol and attorneys at 10 p the night after Nat disappeared--before the H/T arrived at his house?

That's what I saw too.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on August 11, 2006, 04:56:40 AM
From Deepak's statement, June 30 after they had taken him to where he says he dropped off J & Natalee :

On your question whether or not I am persisting that the location where I just indicated at about/near the "Marriot Hotel" is the place where I dropped of Joran and Natalee, I can say the following. I am not sure about the route we drove to get there because it was dark. I think it is the way it happened. That it is the place where I dropped them off.
How many roads are there ? When I look on a map, I see a west road to the Marriott and an east road to the vicinity of the Racquet Club.
...
To some of the discussion earlier.. How can a person stay on the high road after rolling around in the muck while reading these statements ?
These statements say much about the suspects, the police who were questioning them, the country that allowed this to happen, the culture of that country and the values, morals and ethics of all.
I am not Jesus, so I don't have to love them.
Getting angry is normal.
And I don't have as much class as Dave Holloway.
In fact, I am wanting to say some things to demonstrate that I have no class at all.. So, I'll just say them out loud to myself.
@#$%^%^&*&*
Wow, that felt good.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on August 11, 2006, 05:06:15 AM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Quote from: "Freebird"
I am nearly speechless once again.

Was Paul researching drugs, alcohol and attorneys at 10 p the night after Nat disappeared--before the H/T arrived at his house?

That's what I saw too.


Yes.  This seems to be a family business, drugging and raping.  Momma also knew that they were gang-raping Karen in the apartment.  This whole family needs to be in prison, being raped hourly, on a regular basis.

Yes, Poppa was researching the effects drugs and alcohol would have on a girl.  I have come to believe Anita was at home during this time.  The call she got from the headmaster to tell her to tell Joran to quit bragging about the dead girl at school was to her at home.  That phone call was June 1.  I now believe she was always home.  I think she was not only aware but based on her statements about Natalee's panties and what Joran did to her, she is a partaker or a voyeur.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on August 11, 2006, 05:08:21 AM
Quote from: "Freebird"
Quote from: "cubbeegirl"
Quote from: "Freebird"
I am nearly speechless once again.

Was Paul researching drugs, alcohol and attorneys at 10 p the night after Nat disappeared--before the H/T arrived at his house?



It appears that someone was......


Joran was supposedly playing poker or gambling, dont know if that's verified or not.  But the log info shows that in the same session the user was researching stock quotes as well.  Sounds like Paul, and I dont think Joran would be looking into lawyers.  

I feel ill again.  I had about decided Paul was clueless.  And he was just awarded $28k for wrongful detention.  I just dont know what to say.


There were a lot of prostitutes who died in the Netherlands shortly before the Sloot family (a whole family of sluts) moved to Aruba.  I wonder if Paulus could have been responsible for some of that.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on August 11, 2006, 05:10:56 AM
Quote from: "Shell"
Well Greta, I hope your e-meter came with a warranty, I think yours is broken.


Greta is only as good as what she defends.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on August 11, 2006, 05:12:20 AM
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "robots"
the brother was up till  2 34 AM

thats pretty late

not to much of a stretch to think he was up even later and simply used JORAN the PIGS SCREEN for the porn


CORRECTION

3 30 ish he was up to


So this proves Anita lied when she said Val was with her in the Netherlands.  What else has Anita lied about?  Nevermind.  That controlling old witch has lied about everything.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on August 11, 2006, 05:13:45 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "Spock"
Both Kalpoes deny driving Joran home. Val was on the computer last at 3:07, could he or someone with him gone to pick up Joran?



Simian Says: June 25th, 2005 at 7:41 pm
Kalpoes went home. Joran stayed behind. Somebody had to come get him.

  Ooops!  I did it again.


"I picked them up at McDonald's at 4 a.m."  Who are they?  That was Paulus' original statement, and now that horrible rapist is pretending he has a bad memory.  Yep he is probably the one that killed Natalee.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on August 11, 2006, 05:15:15 AM
I now see that it is not Joran that the islanders are afraid of, but Paulus.  They know he is the one who raped and killed Natalee.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on August 11, 2006, 05:20:48 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
From Joran's June 24 statement:
that his father suffers from bad memory and that because of that his and his fathers statements would not correspond

- that his father even can't remember what kind of clothes he himself wore the day before


Well, he would have made a fine judge wouldn't he? :roll:  :roll:

Now if that isn't a load of BS.  Maybe Paulus sweat all his brain cells out.  :roll:


This makes me want to ...........I better not say.  I cannot post any longer.  It was bad enough when I suspected Paulus killed Natalee.  These records, to me, confirm that he raped and killed her.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on August 11, 2006, 05:22:56 AM
So if all three of them were up and using the computer, they would have
seen each other. No ?
Them ? Could be Val & Joran >>


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Anna on August 11, 2006, 05:31:48 AM
.
With what is known today about the effects of alcohol on developing brains, these parents should have those younger two children removed for safety purposes of the children.  They are unfit parents of the worst ilk.  Remember Paulus gave Joran the porn disc Joran showed to the jourlnalist in The Kingdom of the Netherlands, the one he then asked if she wanted him to bite her.  Paulus said it would help keep Joran awake during class.

No wonder Joran has a history of falling asleep during class as his classmates from ISA confirmed.  He is up all night consuming copious amounts of alcohol.  This has to permenently not only warped his personality but his physical self as well especially his brain as alcohol consumed in that quantity destroys brain cells.  He is no longer playing with a full deck as he has fried much of his thinking ability.  They have made him into a monster with their sick permissive parenting or rather being too lazy and sorry to reign him in and get him under control.

Talk about a Dysfunctional Family!!  I suspect the reason Paulus was not on the site long about the effects of drugs and alcohol was simply that he printed it.  That saves it immediately to the printer and you can just log off. I do it all the time but not about subjects like that to try to find out who my son has drugged and raped and killed and how it happened.

And for this they pay this man almsot $30,000 of the taxpayers money!  And we are not supposed to mind that one bit?  BS!!

.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Bearlyhere on August 11, 2006, 05:41:15 AM
Hi Anna.   :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Anna on August 11, 2006, 05:42:19 AM
.
I want the statements made by Paulus van der Sloot.  I want to read those.  What he can't remember is the latest of the lies.  Joran is so much better at remembering the lies than Paulus even if Paulus is conducting this concert.  Old drunks always lose their memories eventually.

And I want to see the statements made by Freddie.  Does he still have the vid or photos??  Was he waiting at Joran's apartment with the equipment all set up and something bad happened and they OD'ed the victim before they ever arrived?  OR did they arrive and then something bad happened??  Show us what you've got, Freddie!

We just may find out over the next few days if these statements continue to be released in this manner.  Wassup with that?  Going to close the Case, Cowgirl?  Doesn't matter --the judge would probably be staying with the Sloots while the trial was being conducted just as he was for the search and so could not sign the warrant because he was staying at the Sloots and it would be discovered by any search of the residence until he could leave and get away from the property.  Now wouldn't that have been embarrassing for him???   :evil:

We are not nearly as stupid as they have thought we Americans were.  We still know lots of things that will come to light, too.

Goodnight or morning whichever it is in your locale. . . .

Anna Snoozing


.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Leslie on August 11, 2006, 06:27:02 AM
Diario
http://www.diarioaruba.com/
Amigoe
http://www.amigoe.com/english/
BonDia
http://www.cspnv.com/archivo/pdf/August/
Aruba Today
http://www.arubatoday.com/
Solo di Pueblo
http://www.solodipueblo.com/
Translator:
http://papiamentu.donamaro.nl/


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: justinsmama on August 11, 2006, 06:29:20 AM
Anna~ I want a proper and thorough investigation and prosecution. I want those responsible for Natalee's disappearance to receive due justice. I also want those, each and every one of them, who have impeded and/or covered up the wheels of justice to be dealt with accordingly. Short of the above, I hope to hell that karma comes back to bite them a 1,000 times over.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: justinsmama on August 11, 2006, 06:31:48 AM
Off to shower and prepare for work. TGIF! See you monkeys laterz!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on August 11, 2006, 06:34:11 AM
Paulus and Anita's judgment may never come in this life time but there is a big roaring fire in Hell for both of them.  They have neglected and abused their children to the point that they are predators and alcoholics.  These two younder children should be removed from their custody and the two of them imprisoned.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: justinsmama on August 11, 2006, 06:37:53 AM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Paulus and Anita's judgment may never come in this life time but there is a big roaring fire in Hell for both of them.  They have neglected and abused their children to the point that they are predators and alcoholics.  These two younder children should be removed from their custody and the two of them imprisoned.


DITTO


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: sharon on August 11, 2006, 07:52:42 AM
Quote from: "Hotshot"
Warning - Adults OnlyThis hardcore reality porn site is a production of Pink Visual Productions.
backseatbangers.com - 6k -


Exactly as Deetch told us awhile back.

So hopefully the 'doubting posters' who called Deetch all sorts of names (and not complimentary ones) and accused him of all sorts of things (also not complimentary)  feel just like the jacka$$es that they are :twisted:

Thanks Deetch -- for the 'heads up'.


.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: sharon on August 11, 2006, 07:53:34 AM
Quote from: "Hotshot"
Warning - Adults OnlyThis hardcore reality porn site is a production of Pink Visual Productions.
backseatbangers.com - 6k -


Just a quick add.

The posters I was referring to WERE NOT MONKEYS.


.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: sharon on August 11, 2006, 08:01:43 AM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Thanks, Klaas.  We should make a wish!!

Now, connecting the dots, it would seem to be a straight line....Lala's what do you think?


Agree 2NJSons_Mom.

But what's in Montana?

Noord is the vds house.

Moko is the dump somewhat behind the vds house (with the white truck dumped in it).

But what is the signfigance of Montana?


.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on August 11, 2006, 08:25:30 AM
Quote from: "sharon"
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Thanks, Klaas.  We should make a wish!!

Now, connecting the dots, it would seem to be a straight line....Lala's what do you think?


Agree 2NJSons_Mom.

But what's in Montana?

Noord is the vds house.

Moko is the dump somewhat behind the vds house (with the white truck dumped in it).

But what is the signfigance of Montana? Montana Montaja is where the Sloot holes live.  I assume Noord is name of area as is Montaja.  These idiots need names for everything but crime.  They are CRIME.


.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Leslie on August 11, 2006, 08:28:59 AM
The van der Sloot address is Montanja 19 and Noord is the area they live in.
I found a website that has many pictures/videos of the nightlife in Aruba:
http://www.ribauntrip.com/
Waiting for the statements from Lorenzo and Paul. :x
I read that Joran phoned Jaime sometime between 4 PM and 7 PM on the Sunday, May 29, 2005 to ask Jaime to go to C&C's with him because he had met some girls.  That would mean that Joran had this planned long before the conversation with the girls who - he says - insisted that he meet them later at C&C's.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on August 11, 2006, 08:33:06 AM
Quote from: "sharon"
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Thanks, Klaas.  We should make a wish!!

Now, connecting the dots, it would seem to be a straight line....Lala's what do you think?


Agree 2NJSons_Mom.

But what's in Montana?

Noord is the vds house.

Moko is the dump somewhat behind the vds house (with the white truck dumped in it).

But what is the signfigance of Montana?


.


VDS house is on Montanja (street name)...Montana or Montanja is another section, which Oldfart had been bringing question to in several posts.  At this point, I am not recalling the significance of this location.  Hoping when Klaasend posts another map, it might be determined.  The Shango/Simion post might have been to lead, mislead, or had no basis in fact.  I was just drawn last night to revisit.  

Now, I must work, but will check in as time allows.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on August 11, 2006, 08:33:22 AM
Quote from: "Leslie"
The van der Sloot address is Montanja 19 and Noord is the area they live in.
I found a website that has many pictures/videos of the nightlife in Aruba:
http://www.ribauntrip.com/
Waiting for the statements from Lorenzo and Paul. :x
I read that Joran phoned Jaime sometime between 4 PM and 7 PM on the Sunday, May 29, 2005 to ask Jaime to go to C&C's with him because he had met some girls.  That would mean that Joran had this planned long before the conversation with the girls who - he says - insisted that he meet them later at C&C's.


Did you read Jaime's statement.  Surely, it was all planned but Pappa seems to have taken over.  The lamb became a goat and Pappa finished off Natalee.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: MuffyBee on August 11, 2006, 08:40:33 AM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Paulus and Anita's judgment may never come in this life time but there is a big roaring fire in Hell for both of them.  They have neglected and abused their children to the point that they are predators and alcoholics.  These two younder children should be removed from their custody and the two of them imprisoned.


I agree with this.  It is sad that it appears Paulus and Anita won't be held accountable in this life time.  But I am a firm believer that you reap what you sow.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on August 11, 2006, 08:41:27 AM
Quote from: "Leslie"
The van der Sloot address is Montanja 19 and Noord is the area they live in.
I found a website that has many pictures/videos of the nightlife in Aruba:
http://www.ribauntrip.com/
Waiting for the statements from Lorenzo and Paul. :x
I read that Joran phoned Jaime sometime between 4 PM and 7 PM on the Sunday, May 29, 2005 to ask Jaime to go to C&C's with him because he had met some girls.  That would mean that Joran had this planned long before the conversation with the girls who - he says - insisted that he meet them later at C&C's.


Great point, Leslie, about the time of the call.

Now, I must get to work.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on August 11, 2006, 08:46:20 AM
Good Morning!

The statements made me ill!

I guess the Dutch system looks for reasons not to prosecute cause it seems to me that some attorney would be all over this in the states.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on August 11, 2006, 08:47:04 AM
Quote from: "MuffyBee"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Paulus and Anita's judgment may never come in this life time but there is a big roaring fire in Hell for both of them.  They have neglected and abused their children to the point that they are predators and alcoholics.  These two younder children should be removed from their custody and the two of them imprisoned.


I agree with this.  It is sad that it appears Paulus and Anita won't be held accountable in this life time.  But I am a firm believer that you reap what you sow.



I agree with you on this also.... the only thing that gives me any consolation in this is the fact that any punishment that could be put upon them in this lifetime would merely last a lifetime. I firmly believe that the punishment they will receive will last an eternity.... JMO


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: sharon on August 11, 2006, 08:47:40 AM
Thanks all :D So the first 2 dots are already connected -- Montana and Noord.

And IIRC -- the MOKO dump has not been thoroughly searched?

What I don't get -- did they REALLY think that this would all go away before all this information was 'released'? Did they really think that everyone who had access to this info would buy into the cover up?

Researching drugs and alcohol. Was this before they did it? Or were they trying to find out what to do after?

Or was this part of the coverup? Trying to make people believe it was drugs and alcohol -- rather than Joran and his hands.

And what's up Jaime??? Joran tries to contact you for a few days before you decide to respond? Another pimp who thinks everyone else is stupid :twisted:

sorry for the rant -- but we all felt there was enough 'proof' to be considered 'circumstantial evidence'. Now we know.

Justice for Natalee.
Peace for her family and loved ones.
Instant Karma for those who hurt her and hid the truth.

.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on August 11, 2006, 08:50:23 AM
Why stick with the coverup if it was done to prevent any impact on tourism and has had the exact opposite effect why are they sticking with it?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on August 11, 2006, 08:56:32 AM
It is beyond my comprehension how anyone could live with theirselves knowing that they had harmed another human being.In my opinion being involved in the cover up is the same thing. They are just as guilty.
I accidentally harmed my kitty cat yesterday and have been sick about it ever since.
After reading the statements last night I lay in my bed and kept thinking about how awful I would feel if I harmed another human being, be it intentional or accidental. How can these people look at themselves in the mirror everyday?And to keep the lid on all of this is the intentional harming of the family on a daily basis.There is no punishment here on earth that fits with what they have done and continue to do JMO


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on August 11, 2006, 09:01:25 AM
Cubbee:

I read the thread in the lounge about your kitty.

It is not the first time I have heard that story.  Somebody else I know did the same thing.

It's not your fault don't beat yourself up - accidents happen.

My kittens have been very curious about the dryer too.

I am leaving the laundy room door closed (as well as the toilets cause they want to drink from them even though I bought them a 35 dollar foountain)!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Kimmy53 on August 11, 2006, 09:04:54 AM
Good Morning everyone!  TGIF!!!

I've been reading thru the latest statements/info.  Wow - alot to digest!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on August 11, 2006, 09:06:57 AM
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"
Cubbee:

I read the thread in the lounge about your kitty.

It is not the first time I have heard that story.  Somebody else I know did the same thing.

It's not your fault don't beat yourself up - accidents happen.

My kittens have been very curious about the dryer too.

I am leaving the laundy room door closed (as well as the toilets cause they want to drink from them even though I bought them a 35 dollar foountain)!



Thanks FM, I do feel so guilty! Am waiting for the vet to call me back a he has not drank or ate ( except for a couple of pieces of Canes fried chicken he mooched off of me yesterday) Although I am sure he is very sore I am still beside myself with guilt and cannot imagine if I had harmed another human being. I read that kittens have been known to drown in the toilet also. Wish mine would even drink from there right now.... :(


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on August 11, 2006, 09:30:33 AM
It's gonna be ok Cubbee. :cry:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on August 11, 2006, 09:33:34 AM
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"
It's gonna be ok Cubbee. :cry:



Thanks friend ......


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: mrs. red on August 11, 2006, 09:38:16 AM
I am just popping in ... didn't read back, but I can see it looks like Cubbee's kitty got into the dryer.

I said a quick prayer for him....


FM - I got the pictures!!!  OMG!!  SO cute!!

Good morning all...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on August 11, 2006, 09:40:34 AM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
I am just popping in ... didn't read back, but I can see it looks like Cubbee's kitty got into the dryer.

I said a quick prayer for him....


FM - I got the pictures!!!  OMG!!  SO cute!!

Good morning all...



Thank mrs. red, I think that yesterday we were traumatized and today the reality is setting in and we are all  worried sick about him.Imagine how that would be if you had harmed a human .......


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: mrs. red on August 11, 2006, 09:41:33 AM
Quote from: "cubbeegirl"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
I am just popping in ... didn't read back, but I can see it looks like Cubbee's kitty got into the dryer.

I said a quick prayer for him....


FM - I got the pictures!!!  OMG!!  SO cute!!

Good morning all...



Thank mrs. red, I think that yesterday we were traumatized and today the reality is setting in and we are all  worried sick about him.Imagine how that would be if you had harmed a human .......


I can't even think about it Cubbee....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Peaches on August 11, 2006, 09:51:25 AM
Good morning.  Now that I've read all the statements, I am not surprised.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: San on August 11, 2006, 10:07:45 AM
These statements need to be plastered in every major newspaper in the United States.  They should run a series of statements every day for a week.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on August 11, 2006, 10:10:08 AM
Good morning all you beautiful Monkeys!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: San on August 11, 2006, 10:12:46 AM
Good Morning Peaches, SunFreak2 and anyone else I missed.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Frijole on August 11, 2006, 10:13:28 AM
Quote from: "San"
These statements need to be plastered in every major newspaper in the United States.  They should run a series of statements every day for a week.


I had a thought this a.m. ... I bet these statements by Joran, especially what he has shared regarding his love life, will not help the sales of his book.  Who would believe anything he said?  Yes San, we need to make sure that everyone knows what a loser he is.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on August 11, 2006, 10:14:18 AM
He said one day he will tell us what happened to Natalee.  I think we know.  His father raped and killed Natalee.  Will he tell that?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Frijole on August 11, 2006, 10:18:28 AM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
He said one day he will tell us what happened to Natalee.  I think we know.  His father raped and killed Natalee.  Will he tell that?


You bet.  Joran will do anything to free his own name and for a buck.  If he's smart he'll wait til Paul dies.  But otherwise, he'll probably just wait til he gets thru college and receives some trust money.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on August 11, 2006, 10:21:12 AM
After reading these statements and seeing what and who was on the computer, it is obvious this family is nothing but a bunch of perverts and liars, and Paulus is the perpetrator.  

We should have guessed that long ago when he was so quick to summon the Kalpoes to his house and set them up.  Kalpoes need to tell the truth and so does Freddy.  They all know it was Paulus.  Who was it that Paulus called to help him.

He did make a call early morning to Steve Croes.  Was Steve Croes the bifron?  What is Steve Croes' uncle's name?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on August 11, 2006, 10:22:59 AM
Quote from: "Tylergal"


This makes me want to ...........I better not say.  I cannot post any longer.  It was bad enough when I suspected Paulus killed Natalee.  These records, to me, confirm that he raped and killed her.


Can you imagine having a Father who rapes & kills young girls, then lets their 17 yo son take the rap for it?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: San on August 11, 2006, 10:25:44 AM
Quote from: "Frijole"
Quote from: "San"
These statements need to be plastered in every major newspaper in the United States.  They should run a series of statements every day for a week.


I had a thought this a.m. ... I bet these statements by Joran, especially what he has shared regarding his love life, will not help the sales of his book.  Who would believe anything he said?  Yes San, we need to make sure that everyone knows what a loser he is.

Yes what a loser he is but also what Aruba did to an American tourist.  It is so obvious by looking at these statements that Van der straaten and Jacobs help the 3 suspects.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: sharon on August 11, 2006, 10:26:55 AM
Well -- if Karin is one of the girls that backed away from pressing charges against Joran because she did not want her family to know......my guess is that they know now.

And even though Joran indicates consensual sex -- and even if it was consensual a couple of times -- if he ever had sex with her after he drugged her, and she did not consent to being drugged -- that would be RAPE. And if she is underage -- the charges are worse.

At least in the US.

In Aruba it may be considered just part of an ordinary 'Saturday night' with the boys.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: San on August 11, 2006, 10:27:56 AM
Quote from: "Frijole"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
He said one day he will tell us what happened to Natalee.  I think we know.  His father raped and killed Natalee.  Will he tell that?


You bet.  Joran will do anything to free his own name and for a buck.  If he's smart he'll wait til Paul dies.  But otherwise, he'll probably just wait til he gets thru college and receives some trust money.

They said the Kalpoes were the greedy ones.  The Van der Sloots are just as greedy.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on August 11, 2006, 10:29:24 AM
Quote from: "sharon"
Well -- if Karin is one of the girls that backed away from pressing charges against Joran because she did not want her family to know......my guess is that they know now.

And even though Joran indicates consensual sex -- and even if it was consensual a couple of times -- if he ever had sex with her after he drugged her, and she did not consent to being drugged -- that would be RAPE. And if she is underage -- the charges are worse.

At least in the US.

In Aruba it may be considered just part of an ordinary 'Saturday night' with the boys.

.


He mentions "chato" pulling back the covers.  Is that trash or what?  They raped this girl and I would be willing to bet there were more than the two of them.  These predators are rapists and Paulus is a rapist and murderer who probably taught them.  Then Anita is just as bad because she consented to this girl spending the night.  This is where I have to step back lest my BP gets so high, I pop an artery thinking about that trashy see-through blouse on that fat thing.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: San on August 11, 2006, 10:31:29 AM
Quote from: "sharon"
Well -- if Karin is one of the girls that backed away from pressing charges against Joran because she did not want her family to know......my guess is that they know now.

And even though Joran indicates consensual sex -- and even if it was consensual a couple of times -- if he ever had sex with her after he drugged her, and she did not consent to being drugged -- that would be RAPE. And if she is underage -- the charges are worse.

At least in the US.

In Aruba it may be considered just part of an ordinary 'Saturday night' with the boys.

.

It is quiet clear that they are drugging and raping local girls.  If I was one of these kids mothers the PIMPS would be dead.  I don't care if I had to spend the rest of my life in jail.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: San on August 11, 2006, 10:32:38 AM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "sharon"
Well -- if Karin is one of the girls that backed away from pressing charges against Joran because she did not want her family to know......my guess is that they know now.

And even though Joran indicates consensual sex -- and even if it was consensual a couple of times -- if he ever had sex with her after he drugged her, and she did not consent to being drugged -- that would be RAPE. And if she is underage -- the charges are worse.

At least in the US.

In Aruba it may be considered just part of an ordinary 'Saturday night' with the boys.

.


He mentions "chato" pulling back the covers.  Is that trash or what?  They raped this girl and I would be willing to bet there were more than the two of them.  These predators are rapists and Paulus is a rapist and murderer who probably taught them.  Then Anita is just as bad because she consented to this girl spending the night.  This is where I have to step back lest my BP gets so high, I pop an artery thinking about that trashy see-through blouse on that fat thing.

I missed you Tyler :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: San on August 11, 2006, 10:33:41 AM
OK Klaas you can lock the thread now we got you to page 50 :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #509 8/9 - 8/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on August 11, 2006, 10:35:00 AM
GOODMORNING ALL!  BET YOU THOUGHT I WAS SLEEPING ON THE JOB  :lol:

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/nowlocked.jpg)

Please move to LCD# 510

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=199