Scared Monkeys Discussion Forum

Natalee Holloway => LCD Archive => Topic started by: San on August 04, 2007, 12:22:58 AM



Title: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: San on August 04, 2007, 12:22:58 AM
Let's hope 2007 brings Justice for Natalee

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/candleman2justice2007.jpg)


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on August 04, 2007, 12:21:08 PM
 :cool:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 04, 2007, 12:25:33 PM
Hey y'all....


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: blah on August 04, 2007, 12:25:56 PM
thanks Mrs Red, it is indeed all crusty around the lid.

But i DO like to live on the edge, hmmmm

 :lol: :lol:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Auntiem on August 04, 2007, 12:26:54 PM
throw it out


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Auntiem on August 04, 2007, 12:28:19 PM
 :puker: :puker:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: blah on August 04, 2007, 12:30:52 PM
alright alright, i'll go with the salsa, just got it the other day

 :lol: :lol:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: IBE on August 04, 2007, 12:32:35 PM
Good Morning all!!

Am behind in reading about 10 pages. I think. What have I missed?

Mrs. Red, I have an idea about a compromise and another about something that might work for all concerned. Did you get me email?

Am going over to Albert's store in about a 1/2 hr. and work on being a yenta.

Don't forget Monkeys... watch Geraldo's show on Fox News channel (cable, I think) tonight for breaking news on the young girl missing, Donna Jou and maybe about TES.

Depending on what is said, Monkeys may have to just into action. depending on what is presented on the show or maybe what is not.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on August 04, 2007, 12:33:15 PM
In response to the tranlation Klaas posted in the last thread (Surprise...somebody ain't telling the truth.):

Freddy said Joran told him on 05/30/05
He went and they have danced there

Joran’s PV 06/09/05
After I had refused to dance with Natalee Deepak, Satish and myself walked to the bar.

They drove in the direction of the lighthouse

In Greta’s interview Joran never places them at the lighthouse.  He says they went to his house but never got out of the car.

The girl said that if the Kalpoe brothers would had lived in her city,
they would have been slaves.


Deepak’s PV on 06/11/05
To your question whether the girl had made racist comment to us, I can say the following. The girl made no comment like that to us.

The next day, Tuesday May 31st, 2005 in the afternoon I was with Joran at the Racquet Club. Joran looked worried. He asked me if I remembered what he told me about the girl the day before, I said yes. The girl appeared to be missing.

Joran knew the girl was missing.  He is either setting the stage with Freddy or he and Freddy are making up the lies on 05/30/05.

The FBI was at his home at night, but he wasn't there. His father phoned as to where he was, Joran said in the Radisson Casino. He told that after the phone call he was called by Deepak and that Deepak picked him up a few minutes later.

That sequence of events is out of whack.  Deepak was already with Joran when he got the call from Paulus.

Joran believes Freddy got the dates wrong and that he told Freddy the lie on May 31st. Joran denies having stated that the girl fell unconscious and that "we" left her on the beach. Joran does not consider the mistakes strange as witnesses often have problems concerning dates, events from almost two weeks earlier.

Or….”That damned Freddy can’ get the story straight!!!  I told him what to say and he can’t get it right.  Do I have do everything around here?!”

Carlo visits Joran at Jail and confronts him with Freddy's statement. At this point Joran admits that he had lied and that "Freddy was telling the truth."

So which is it…Freddy got it wrong or Freddy was right???

Joran claims the police could manufacture statements and that the police would go pretty far afield. "We" even considered the possibilituy that the police would plant evidence to close the case given the pressure they were under.

Shango Says: June 26th, 2005 at 4:26 pm
The maze of Babylon is very difficult for the supposed guilty, even if innocent
The Arawaks cannot reveal their singing card
many teepees would be destroyed and the cowboys would get upset
the singing card is bad luck for wampum for many moons
So there must be some type of sacrifice
The gods are hungry, the cowboys are hungry
Great disruption in the halls of babylonian palace

She speaks normal and her eyes are normal also, but she was a little drunk and often fell half asleep.

This whole statement is contradictory.  You don’t look normal if you are a “little drunk and often fall(ing) half asleep”.

Around 3:30AM Satish drops me off at my house. I have left my shoes on the beach. Satish tells me he will go get them the next day.

You just have to call BS on this one.  Why would Satish go back to get Joran’s shoes for him unless he is indeed Joran’s slave.  Sounds like Joran thinks of the Kalpoes as slaves, not Natalee.

That Freddy has stated that we did not know what to do when she did not recover and that we then left her on the beach and that I left my sport shoes behind, that is not correct. This did not happen this way. I have left my sport shoes at the Marriott beach. I think Freddy did not correctly understand what I told him.

Once again Freddy is not telling the lies the way he is supposed to.  Or, Joran has changed the story since going to jail and Freddy doesn’t know about the change in plans…like SGC.

In a second statement on June 13th, Freddy "keeps insisting" that Joran told him the HI story on May 30th. In his sixth and seventh statements Freddy repeated that Joran had unsuccesfully tried to revive an unconsious Natalee and that Joran thought that a black tourist couple on the beach would look after Natalee.

Why do these people keep trying to blame a black person (people)?




Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 04, 2007, 12:33:26 PM
Shelf life of cocktail sauce:

http://www.msnbc.com/OnAir/nbc/Dateline/Food/shelf.asp

Catsup, tomato; cocktail sauce or chili sauce

Shelf-stable
foods
Unopenedon shelf (12 months)
Opened,refrigerated (6 months)
Opened on shelf ( 1 month)


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: IBE on August 04, 2007, 12:34:23 PM
Anyone know Geraldo's email.. one that really works? TIA


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: blah on August 04, 2007, 12:34:52 PM
More from the religion if peace
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,292090,00.html

on top of that, could you even begin to imagine the outrage if we created a "Your White Christian Bakery" ?  Seems they are doing more thank just baking cookies in this joint...

"The search warrant yielded several weapons and other evidence of value including evidence linking the murder of Chauncey Bailey to members of the Your Black Muslim Bakery," said Assistant Police Chief Howard Jordan, who said the raids were part of a yearlong investigation into a variety of violent crimes."

http://www.ybmb.com/



Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 04, 2007, 12:35:29 PM
thanks Mrs Red, it is indeed all crusty around the lid.

But i DO like to live on the edge, hmmmm

 :lol: :lol:

that's not the edge to live on... LOL


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: blah on August 04, 2007, 12:36:03 PM
also a little odd how thier "lectures Online" link seems to be down since this story broke, huh

http://www.ybmb.com/


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 04, 2007, 12:36:14 PM
More from the religion if peace
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,292090,00.html

on top of that, could you even begin to imagine the outrage if we created a "Your White Christian Bakery" ?  Seems they are doing more thank just baking cookies in this joint...

"The search warrant yielded several weapons and other evidence of value including evidence linking the murder of Chauncey Bailey to members of the Your Black Muslim Bakery," said Assistant Police Chief Howard Jordan, who said the raids were part of a yearlong investigation into a variety of violent crimes."

http://www.ybmb.com/



did you read the front page story???


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 04, 2007, 12:36:34 PM
Anyone know Geraldo's email.. one that really works? TIA

Did you try this one?

Atlarge@foxnews.com


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: blah on August 04, 2007, 12:37:44 PM
Shelf life of cocktail sauce:

http://www.msnbc.com/OnAir/nbc/Dateline/Food/shelf.asp

Catsup, tomato; cocktail sauce or chili sauce

Shelf-stable
foods
Unopenedon shelf (12 months)
Opened,refrigerated (6 months)
Opened on shelf ( 1 month)

thank you, thank you very much   :wink:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: blah on August 04, 2007, 12:38:40 PM
More from the religion if peace
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,292090,00.html

on top of that, could you even begin to imagine the outrage if we created a "Your White Christian Bakery" ?  Seems they are doing more thank just baking cookies in this joint...

"The search warrant yielded several weapons and other evidence of value including evidence linking the murder of Chauncey Bailey to members of the Your Black Muslim Bakery," said Assistant Police Chief Howard Jordan, who said the raids were part of a yearlong investigation into a variety of violent crimes."

http://www.ybmb.com/



did you read the front page story???

no, didnt know there was one, i'll go check it out


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: IBE on August 04, 2007, 12:38:45 PM
Mrs. Red, did you see my post?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: IBE on August 04, 2007, 12:40:47 PM
Thanks Klaas, I will.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: IBE on August 04, 2007, 12:42:19 PM
I hope Red will be writing a story on the Front Page about the "search efforts" after Geraldo's show.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Auntiem on August 04, 2007, 12:43:05 PM
    I believe Joran has "a little bit of knowledge" regarding the South....and we all know how a little bit of knowledge is a dangerous thing.....Either that or the schools on Aruba are back a few centuries and he is caught up in Ante-Bellum South thinking....ergo he thought Natalee was a Southern Belle from a Plantation!!!  What an idiot....   Maybe we should send them some updated history books!!!! :-?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 04, 2007, 12:43:31 PM
Mrs. Red, did you see my post?

IBE... I did see it.  Are you emailing me?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: CJ1 on August 04, 2007, 12:44:02 PM
About the shoes being left on the beach...I would suspect that there was evidence on them and Joran didn't want anyone looking for them around the house.  It was also a good cover for his parents.  If his parents bought them for him in FL (I think I read that), they may not be available in Aruba.  I believe they are rather expensive and his parents may get angry about him losing them, but it would be an excuse that his parents would believe and his mother would jump down anyone's throat that didn't believe her son.  Years ago I knew a kid that would only wear KSwiss and he guarded them with his life.  If Joran could get them cleaned up he could just say he found them. 


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 04, 2007, 12:44:12 PM
That translation from Scrux is full of interesting stuff. Thx for posting it, Klaas.

Those shoes...........I know, Mrs. Red thinks that maybe Joran kept and wore them, and maybe he did. But the shoes were something they felt needed to addressed early on. Why?


After the "something bad" happened at the VDS residence ... I contend that the plan was to take Natalee to the Marriott Beach and leave her there to be discovered the next morning ... dead of a drug overdose.  Deepak dropped Joran, Freddy and a deceased Natalee off at the Marriot Beach and ... he then drove his vehicle across the street and parked it near the Racquet Ball club.  I tend to agree with Dave Holloways theory regarding what happened to Joran shoes.

I suspect that Joran had second thoughts about leaving Natalee's body on the beach when he considered the forensic evidence that would reveal a sexual assault ... a beating.  I speculate that Joran, Deepak and Freddy were discussing this issue when the gardener observed them sitting in Deepak's vehicle.  Later Paulus was contacted and ... enters the scenario .....

Janet


Dave Holloway
NANCY GRACE
August 1, 2005


DAVE HOLLOWAY, NATALEE HOLLOWAY`S FATHER: Well, what they were doing, I think, was the pond that they drained, they feel like possibly he may have been cutting across the beach, back to the racquet club, and got stuck in the mud and lost his shoes.

That`s the only plausible explanation I could think of. The police have not told me specifically what the reasoning is, but, as you`re well aware, the gardener pinpointed them at the racquet club in her vehicle. So I think the shoes may have been lost, maybe cutting across the field from the beach area.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 04, 2007, 12:45:41 PM
   I believe Joran has "a little bit of knowledge" regarding the South....and we all know how a little bit of knowledge is a dangerous thing.....Either that or the schools on Aruba are back a few centuries and he is caught up in Ante-Bellum South thinking....ergo he thought Natalee was a Southern Belle from a Plantation!!!  What an idiot....   Maybe we should send them some updated history books!!!! :-?

I think that it's the island that has a race problem... notice joran keeps trying to place the blame on black security guards, black tourists, etc.   
He just assumed that a white girl would be into this way of thinking... that here in the US it wouldn't be questioned, the media seems to love to crank up the race issue...


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Auntiem on August 04, 2007, 12:46:56 PM
   That a good theory, but wasn't there only ONE shoe missing at first?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 04, 2007, 12:47:10 PM
I hope Red will be writing a story on the Front Page about the "search efforts" after Geraldo's show.
I bet he will. 


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 04, 2007, 12:47:29 PM
About the shoes being left on the beach...I would suspect that there was evidence on them and Joran didn't want anyone looking for them around the house.  It was also a good cover for his parents.  If his parents bought them for him in FL (I think I read that), they may not be available in Aruba.  I believe they are rather expensive and his parents may get angry about him losing them, but it would be an excuse that his parents would believe and his mother would jump down anyone's throat that didn't believe her son.  Years ago I knew a kid that would only wear KSwiss and he guarded them with his life.  If Joran could get them cleaned up he could just say he found them. 

yep, and he was smirking all the way to the proverbial bank thinking that he had "got this one over on them".


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 04, 2007, 12:49:22 PM
That translation from Scrux is full of interesting stuff. Thx for posting it, Klaas.

Those shoes...........I know, Mrs. Red thinks that maybe Joran kept and wore them, and maybe he did. But the shoes were something they felt needed to addressed early on. Why?


After the "something bad" happened at the VDS residence ... I contend that the plan was to take Natalee to the Marriott Beach and leave her there to be discovered the next morning ... dead of a drug overdose.  Deepak dropped Joran, Freddy and a deceased Natalee off at the Marriot Beach and ... he then drove his vehicle across the street and parked it near the Racquet Ball club.  I tend to agree with Dave Holloways theory regarding what happened to Joran shoes.

I suspect that Joran had second thoughts about leaving Natalee's body on the beach when he considered the forensic evidence that would reveal a sexual assault ... a beating.  I speculate that Joran, Deepak and Freddy were discussing this issue when the gardener observed them sitting in Deepak's vehicle.  Later Paulus was contacted and ... enters the scenario .....

Janet


Dave Holloway
NANCY GRACE
August 1, 2005


DAVE HOLLOWAY, NATALEE HOLLOWAY`S FATHER: Well, what they were doing, I think, was the pond that they drained, they feel like possibly he may have been cutting across the beach, back to the racquet club, and got stuck in the mud and lost his shoes.

That`s the only plausible explanation I could think of. The police have not told me specifically what the reasoning is, but, as you`re well aware, the gardener pinpointed them at the racquet club in her vehicle. So I think the shoes may have been lost, maybe cutting across the field from the beach area.


Yes, very plausible.  Also fits in with my theory that Natalee was never alive with Joran at the Marriott Beach.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Auntiem on August 04, 2007, 12:49:42 PM
  The island, the Dutch have a race problem, Mrs, Red, ....very similar to South Africa in the wasy they refer to the different colors of people.  


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Easywriter on August 04, 2007, 12:50:56 PM
alright alright, i'll go with the salsa, just got it the other day

 :lol: :lol:

Recently I was going to put some BBQ sauce on some sausage.  Decided to look at the label and it said, “best used by June ‘03”   :shock:

That caused me to look at all my ketchup and stuff like that.  Emptied my frige out and started over.  I don't mind ruffin' it, but I ain't gonna risk things getting that ruff!


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Auntiem on August 04, 2007, 12:52:03 PM
 Easy, check your Mayo!!!!


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: blah on August 04, 2007, 12:54:11 PM
   I believe Joran has "a little bit of knowledge" regarding the South....and we all know how a little bit of knowledge is a dangerous thing.....Either that or the schools on Aruba are back a few centuries and he is caught up in Ante-Bellum South thinking....ergo he thought Natalee was a Southern Belle from a Plantation!!!  What an idiot....   Maybe we should send them some updated history books!!!! :-?

I think that it's the island that has a race problem... notice joran keeps trying to place the blame on black security guards, black tourists, etc.   
He just assumed that a white girl would be into this way of thinking... that here in the US it wouldn't be questioned, the media seems to love to crank up the race issue...

I think that island has some very major misconceptions about how the real world really works, and this race thing is a big one.  Inside of their little drug haven, their social skills are stuck in the 1800's.  Their "bury your head in the sand" mentality has kept the minorities from making any gains in civil rights, and quite frankly, they still think the rest of the world operates this way.  Aruba is the real "Lost World".


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: IBE on August 04, 2007, 12:55:34 PM
Mrs. Red, did you see my post?

IBE... I did see it.  Are you emailing me?

I emailed you a big one last night about all the challenges and et al. Did you get it?  About midnight pdt Did you get it?

Am working on an info sheet for Mr. Vera now. and an email to Geraldo about something he should also say...


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on August 04, 2007, 12:56:38 PM
   I believe Joran has "a little bit of knowledge" regarding the South....and we all know how a little bit of knowledge is a dangerous thing.....Either that or the schools on Aruba are back a few centuries and he is caught up in Ante-Bellum South thinking....ergo he thought Natalee was a Southern Belle from a Plantation!!!  What an idiot....   Maybe we should send them some updated history books!!!! :-?

The history books can be sent, but you have to remember, history is always written by the winners.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: blah on August 04, 2007, 12:56:59 PM
alright alright, i'll go with the salsa, just got it the other day

 :lol: :lol:

Recently I was going to put some BBQ sauce on some sausage.  Decided to look at the label and it said, “best used by June ‘03”   :shock:

That caused me to look at all my ketchup and stuff like that.  Emptied my frige out and started over.  I don't mind ruffin' it, but I ain't gonna risk things getting that ruff!

I was at my uncle's a few weeks ago for a BBQ.  When time came around to eat, he took some Brats and rather than the typical kethcup, mustard, onions, sauerkraut, whatever, he smothered them with salsa.  I had to try it and i'll tell, it was really good!!!  Try it sometime!!


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 04, 2007, 12:58:00 PM
i did ibe, my response is short - seems like you are moving right along... and doing a great job!


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: blah on August 04, 2007, 12:58:31 PM
as a side note - always, ALWAYS keep a jar of salsa around, its good for many many things and it will get you out of a jam!!!

 :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Easywriter on August 04, 2007, 12:59:21 PM
Easy, check your Mayo!!!!

I never trust mayo, but didn't give much thought to ketchup and mustard.  That stuff has dates on it too!   :shock:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 04, 2007, 01:00:17 PM
as a side note - always, ALWAYS keep a jar of salsa around, its good for many many things and it will get you out of a jam!!!

 :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

I do...salsa rocks!!


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 04, 2007, 01:00:46 PM
as a side note - always, ALWAYS keep a jar of salsa around, its good for many many things and it will get you out of a jam!!!

 :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Check the label on your JAM too, LOL  :lol:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on August 04, 2007, 01:02:10 PM
   I believe Joran has "a little bit of knowledge" regarding the South....and we all know how a little bit of knowledge is a dangerous thing.....Either that or the schools on Aruba are back a few centuries and he is caught up in Ante-Bellum South thinking....ergo he thought Natalee was a Southern Belle from a Plantation!!!  What an idiot....   Maybe we should send them some updated history books!!!! :-?

I think that it's the island that has a race problem... notice joran keeps trying to place the blame on black security guards, black tourists, etc.   
He just assumed that a white girl would be into this way of thinking... that here in the US it wouldn't be questioned, the media seems to love to crank up the race issue...

The media will crank up the race issue if it's white on black, not the other way around. 

I think Joran's family and education has led him to this belief about people from Alabama and all of the implications he has made toward black people was meant to trap Natalee's family into believing him.  He thinks that is what all southerners do...blame the blacks.  He is wrong about that and Beth knew immediately that he security guards were innocent and said so.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: San on August 04, 2007, 01:02:14 PM
   I believe Joran has "a little bit of knowledge" regarding the South....and we all know how a little bit of knowledge is a dangerous thing.....Either that or the schools on Aruba are back a few centuries and he is caught up in Ante-Bellum South thinking....ergo he thought Natalee was a Southern Belle from a Plantation!!!  What an idiot....   Maybe we should send them some updated history books!!!! :-?

I think that it's the island that has a race problem... notice joran keeps trying to place the blame on black security guards, black tourists, etc.   
He just assumed that a white girl would be into this way of thinking... that here in the US it wouldn't be questioned, the media seems to love to crank up the race issue...

I believe the race issue came from Paulus.  You learn from the people around you and Joran learned well from his daddy and mommy.  Besides what idiot of a prosecutor writes a letter to the FBI asking if Beth is related to Hitler.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 04, 2007, 01:03:50 PM
both great points Truth and San...


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Easywriter on August 04, 2007, 01:04:00 PM
alright alright, i'll go with the salsa, just got it the other day

 :lol: :lol:

Recently I was going to put some BBQ sauce on some sausage.  Decided to look at the label and it said, “best used by June ‘03”   :shock:

That caused me to look at all my ketchup and stuff like that.  Emptied my frige out and started over.  I don't mind ruffin' it, but I ain't gonna risk things getting that ruff!

I was at my uncle's a few weeks ago for a BBQ.  When time came around to eat, he took some Brats and rather than the typical kethcup, mustard, onions, sauerkraut, whatever, he smothered them with salsa.  I had to try it and i'll tell, it was really good!!!  Try it sometime!!

Sounds good to me!  I put hot salsa on hot dogs all the time.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on August 04, 2007, 01:06:27 PM
Besides what idiot of a prosecutor writes a letter to the FBI asking if Beth is related to Hitler.

LOL.  Th eonly one I can think of used to be in Aruba...Land of the Lost.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 04, 2007, 01:07:13 PM
Shelf life of cocktail sauce:

http://www.msnbc.com/OnAir/nbc/Dateline/Food/shelf.asp

Catsup, tomato; cocktail sauce or chili sauce

Shelf-stable
foods
Unopenedon shelf (12 months)
Opened,refrigerated (6 months)
Opened on shelf ( 1 month)

My hubby and I are constantly at odds over this expiry date issue.  He claims if the condiments are kept free from contamination and are kept refrigerated ... they are still safe to eat after the indicated date.  He points out ... "BEST BEFORE".  Me ... I chuck contents of jars down the sink on the expiry date.  Not a day before and ... not a day after.  Only on that magic date predetermined by minds much superior than mine.

Now I am to understand ... that the expiry day means nothing once a jar is opened.  I am wondering why I am not pushing pushing up daisy ... succumbed long ago to a bout a food poisoning. :lol:

Janet


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: blah on August 04, 2007, 01:08:08 PM
as a side note - always, ALWAYS keep a jar of salsa around, its good for many many things and it will get you out of a jam!!!

 :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Check the label on your JAM too, LOL  :lol:

 :lol: :lol:

my girlfriend goes through jam/jelley like nothing I have ever seen.  She must be eating it in the middle of the night or something because i never see her eating it, but it always seems to be emtpy on the rare occasion i want some  :lol:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Auntiem on August 04, 2007, 01:08:30 PM
      they ALL thought the Southern Lady would fall for the "Black Guys Did it"  so ignorant!!!!!  Beth wants the TRUTH!!!  The real DEVILS, not some patsys, !!!


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Easywriter on August 04, 2007, 01:08:51 PM
   I believe Joran has "a little bit of knowledge" regarding the South....and we all know how a little bit of knowledge is a dangerous thing.....Either that or the schools on Aruba are back a few centuries and he is caught up in Ante-Bellum South thinking....ergo he thought Natalee was a Southern Belle from a Plantation!!!  What an idiot....   Maybe we should send them some updated history books!!!! :-?

I think that it's the island that has a race problem... notice joran keeps trying to place the blame on black security guards, black tourists, etc.   
He just assumed that a white girl would be into this way of thinking... that here in the US it wouldn't be questioned, the media seems to love to crank up the race issue...

I believe the race issue came from Paulus.  You learn from the people around you and Joran learned well from his daddy and mommy.  Besides what idiot of a prosecutor writes a letter to the FBI asking if Beth is related to Hitler.

Wasn’t that one of the most amazing things to come out of all of this!  WTH!

People on that island seem to be a little backward about women too, but several women do hold high positions.  It is all mixed up about a lot of things.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 04, 2007, 01:10:27 PM
as a side note - always, ALWAYS keep a jar of salsa around, its good for many many things and it will get you out of a jam!!!

 :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Check the label on your JAM too, LOL  :lol:

 :lol: :lol:

my girlfriend goes through jam/jelley like nothing I have ever seen.  She must be eating it in the middle of the night or something because i never see her eating it, but it always seems to be emtpy on the rare occasion i want some  :lol:

I am guilty of that one.... toast with jam low fat way to satisfy sweet tooth....


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on August 04, 2007, 01:11:10 PM
   I believe Joran has "a little bit of knowledge" regarding the South....and we all know how a little bit of knowledge is a dangerous thing.....Either that or the schools on Aruba are back a few centuries and he is caught up in Ante-Bellum South thinking....ergo he thought Natalee was a Southern Belle from a Plantation!!!  What an idiot....   Maybe we should send them some updated history books!!!! :-?

I think that it's the island that has a race problem... notice joran keeps trying to place the blame on black security guards, black tourists, etc.   
He just assumed that a white girl would be into this way of thinking... that here in the US it wouldn't be questioned, the media seems to love to crank up the race issue...

I believe the race issue came from Paulus.  You learn from the people around you and Joran learned well from his daddy and mommy.  Besides what idiot of a prosecutor writes a letter to the FBI asking if Beth is related to Hitler.

Wasn’t that one of the most amazing things to come out of all of this!  WTH!

People on that island seem to be a little backward about women too, but several women do hold high positions.  It is all mixed up about a lot of things.


Do you think it's possible that the few women who hold high positions in Aruba only hold them if the women do what the men in charge tell them to do?  I do.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: blah on August 04, 2007, 01:11:23 PM
Shelf life of cocktail sauce:

http://www.msnbc.com/OnAir/nbc/Dateline/Food/shelf.asp

Catsup, tomato; cocktail sauce or chili sauce

Shelf-stable
foods
Unopenedon shelf (12 months)
Opened,refrigerated (6 months)
Opened on shelf ( 1 month)

My hubby and I are constantly at odds over this expiry date issue.  He claims if the condiments are kept free from contamination and are kept refrigerated ... they are still safe to eat after the indicated date.  He points out ... "BEST BEFORE".  Me ... I chuck contents of jars down the sink on the expiry date.  Not a day before and ... not a day after.  Only on that magic date predetermined by minds much superior than mine.

Now I am to understand ... that the expiry day means nothing once a jar is opened.  I am wondering why I am not pushing pushing up daisy ... succumbed long ago to a bout a food poisoning. :lol:

Janet

I am much like your husband, those dates are mere suggestions  :lol: :lol: :lol:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Auntiem on August 04, 2007, 01:12:34 PM
   The Dutch have kept those people down and they don't even know it.  I also believe that the Dutch who go there to  live are Flunkies from the NL who can't make it there and cane be big fish on that lil hell hole!!


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: blah on August 04, 2007, 01:12:59 PM
as a side note - always, ALWAYS keep a jar of salsa around, its good for many many things and it will get you out of a jam!!!

 :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Check the label on your JAM too, LOL  :lol:

 :lol: :lol:

my girlfriend goes through jam/jelley like nothing I have ever seen.  She must be eating it in the middle of the night or something because i never see her eating it, but it always seems to be emtpy on the rare occasion i want some  :lol:

I am guilty of that one.... toast with jam low fat way to satisfy sweet tooth....

do you put the empty jar back in the fridge like nothing ever happened?  :lol: :lol: :lol:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Easywriter on August 04, 2007, 01:14:52 PM
Shelf life of cocktail sauce:

http://www.msnbc.com/OnAir/nbc/Dateline/Food/shelf.asp

Catsup, tomato; cocktail sauce or chili sauce

Shelf-stable
foods
Unopenedon shelf (12 months)
Opened,refrigerated (6 months)
Opened on shelf ( 1 month)

My hubby and I are constantly at odds over this expiry date issue.  He claims if the condiments are kept free from contamination and are kept refrigerated ... they are still safe to eat after the indicated date.  He points out ... "BEST BEFORE".  Me ... I chuck contents of jars down the sink on the expiry date.  Not a day before and ... not a day after.  Only on that magic date predetermined by minds much superior than mine.

Now I am to understand ... that the expiry day means nothing once a jar is opened.  I am wondering why I am not pushing pushing up daisy ... succumbed long ago to a bout a food poisoning. :lol:

Janet

I am much like your husband, those dates are mere suggestions  :lol: :lol: :lol:

Once upon a time I just used the smell test.  If it didn’t stink too bad or move on its own, then WTH……

I’ve grown more cautious with the years.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Easywriter on August 04, 2007, 01:16:50 PM
Anyone else getting long white pages after a post this morning?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: blah on August 04, 2007, 01:16:59 PM
  The Dutch have kept those people down and they don't even know it.  I also believe that the Dutch who go there to  live are Flunkies from the NL who can't make it there and cane be big fish on that lil hell hole!!

I dont know if I really blame the Dutch as much as the people who stay drunk or stoned 24/7 and live this lifestyle of not really caring whats going on in their community.  The Dutch do seem to take advantage of these idiots, but hey, thats what happens when people bury their head in the sand and dont stand up for themselves.  These people just accept whatever comes their way and dont really care too much about anything or anyone. 


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Auntiem on August 04, 2007, 01:19:13 PM
  The Dutch have kept those people down and they don't even know it.  I also believe that the Dutch who go there to  live are Flunkies from the NL who can't make it there and cane be big fish on that lil hell hole!!

I dont know if I really blame the Dutch as much as the people who stay drunk or stoned 24/7 and live this lifestyle of not really caring whats going on in their community.  The Dutch do seem to take advantage of these idiots, but hey, thats what happens when people bury their head in the sand and dont stand up for themselves.  These people just accept whatever comes their way and dont really care too much about anything or anyone. 


   Which is the Cause and which is the Effect???


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 04, 2007, 01:22:13 PM
  The Dutch have kept those people down and they don't even know it.  I also believe that the Dutch who go there to  live are Flunkies from the NL who can't make it there and cane be big fish on that lil hell hole!!

I dont know if I really blame the Dutch as much as the people who stay drunk or stoned 24/7 and live this lifestyle of not really caring whats going on in their community.  The Dutch do seem to take advantage of these idiots, but hey, thats what happens when people bury their head in the sand and dont stand up for themselves.  These people just accept whatever comes their way and dont really care too much about anything or anyone. 

isn't that the truth... they don't protest the fact that these kids have brought this on the island and their tourism industry and yet they found the time to protest Beth???  yes that makes all the sense in the world...


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: blah on August 04, 2007, 01:22:35 PM

Once upon a time I just used the smell test.  If it didn’t stink too bad or move on its own, then WTH……

I’ve grown more cautious with the years.


If there is a loaf of bread thats getting to be close to a week old or so, my girlfriend will examine that bread like she is performing an autopsy.  If she finds on little tiny spot of mold, she will toss the whole loaf out.  I'll just pull the part off with the mold and eat the rest of the piece and she thinks its just the grossest thing and cant even watch :lol: :lol: :lol:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: blah on August 04, 2007, 01:23:36 PM
  The Dutch have kept those people down and they don't even know it.  I also believe that the Dutch who go there to  live are Flunkies from the NL who can't make it there and cane be big fish on that lil hell hole!!

I dont know if I really blame the Dutch as much as the people who stay drunk or stoned 24/7 and live this lifestyle of not really caring whats going on in their community.  The Dutch do seem to take advantage of these idiots, but hey, thats what happens when people bury their head in the sand and dont stand up for themselves.  These people just accept whatever comes their way and dont really care too much about anything or anyone. 


   Which is the Cause and which is the Effect???

good question, I think those people were that way before the Dutch came along


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: blah on August 04, 2007, 01:27:43 PM

isn't that the truth... they don't protest the fact that these kids have brought this on the island and their tourism industry and yet they found the time to protest Beth???  yes that makes all the sense in the world...

I still dont understand how to organizer of that event even managed to get those people of their lazy asses and protest.  Certainly they didnt do it because they were concerned citizens and worried about the treatment of Deepak Kalpoe. 

I can think of only one thing that motivates people on that island and it is money.  Were those protestors paid to stand their with their signs?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Auntiem on August 04, 2007, 01:29:28 PM
   Well at least they were in control of their island.  And who brought the drug trade and slave trade?  Was it the Natives, or was it the intruders who decided to take over and exploit the island for all it's worth?  Who is getting rich on the island and who is being treated like second class citizens?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on August 04, 2007, 01:30:20 PM
  The Dutch have kept those people down and they don't even know it.  I also believe that the Dutch who go there to  live are Flunkies from the NL who can't make it there and cane be big fish on that lil hell hole!!

I dont know if I really blame the Dutch as much as the people who stay drunk or stoned 24/7 and live this lifestyle of not really caring whats going on in their community.  The Dutch do seem to take advantage of these idiots, but hey, thats what happens when people bury their head in the sand and dont stand up for themselves.  These people just accept whatever comes their way and dont really care too much about anything or anyone. 


   Which is the Cause and which is the Effect???

good question, I think those people were that way before the Dutch came along

Hard to tell.  Deportation seems to be a stabling factor..for the ruling class anyway.  If you 'buck the system' you are sent back to where you came from.  And, by 'buck the system' I am not talking about breaking any laws.  I think in Aruba they have to "go along to get along".


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on August 04, 2007, 01:31:15 PM

isn't that the truth... they don't protest the fact that these kids have brought this on the island and their tourism industry and yet they found the time to protest Beth???  yes that makes all the sense in the world...

I still dont understand how to organizer of that event even managed to get those people of their lazy asses and protest.  Certainly they didnt do it because they were concerned citizens and worried about the treatment of Deepak Kalpoe. 

I can think of only one thing that motivates people on that island and it is money.  Were those protestors paid to stand their with their signs?

They wanted Beth off the island.  She was bad for business.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Destiny on August 04, 2007, 01:31:23 PM
:cool:

I see Robots has changed his avitar and and name :joker:

JUST KIDDING
Destiny :salut:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Auntiem on August 04, 2007, 01:32:23 PM
  The Dutch have kept those people down and they don't even know it.  I also believe that the Dutch who go there to  live are Flunkies from the NL who can't make it there and cane be big fish on that lil hell hole!!

I dont know if I really blame the Dutch as much as the people who stay drunk or stoned 24/7 and live this lifestyle of not really caring whats going on in their community.  The Dutch do seem to take advantage of these idiots, but hey, thats what happens when people bury their head in the sand and dont stand up for themselves.  These people just accept whatever comes their way and dont really care too much about anything or anyone. 


   Which is the Cause and which is the Effect???

good question, I think those people were that way before the Dutch came along

Hard to tell.  Deportation seems to be a stabling factor..for the ruling class anyway.  If you 'buck the system' you are sent back to where you came from.  And, by 'buck the system' I am not talking about breaking any laws.  I think in Aruba they have to "go along to get along".



Who really rules Aruba??????


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Auntiem on August 04, 2007, 01:34:07 PM
   Is Rob here????  or Robots????? :-? :-?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: blah on August 04, 2007, 01:34:33 PM
  Well at least they were in control of their island.  And who brought the drug trade and slave trade?  Was it the Natives, or was it the intruders who decided to take over and exploit the island for all it's worth?  Who is getting rich on the island and who is being treated like second class citizens?

I'm pretty sure the Dutch brought the slave trade, but i think the drugs (at least pot and cocaine) has probably been there all along, especially give Aruba's proximity to Venezuala.  I think the mentality of the natives goes back to before the Dutch came along.

But I blame the natives for not fighting for their rights and allowing things to get so out of control on "their" island.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: blah on August 04, 2007, 01:36:44 PM

isn't that the truth... they don't protest the fact that these kids have brought this on the island and their tourism industry and yet they found the time to protest Beth???  yes that makes all the sense in the world...

I still dont understand how to organizer of that event even managed to get those people of their lazy asses and protest.  Certainly they didnt do it because they were concerned citizens and worried about the treatment of Deepak Kalpoe. 

I can think of only one thing that motivates people on that island and it is money.  Were those protestors paid to stand their with their signs?

They wanted Beth off the island.  She was bad for business.

so then they were still motivated by money rather than the desire to do the right thing and find the truth.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: blah on August 04, 2007, 01:37:39 PM
  The Dutch have kept those people down and they don't even know it.  I also believe that the Dutch who go there to  live are Flunkies from the NL who can't make it there and cane be big fish on that lil hell hole!!

I dont know if I really blame the Dutch as much as the people who stay drunk or stoned 24/7 and live this lifestyle of not really caring whats going on in their community.  The Dutch do seem to take advantage of these idiots, but hey, thats what happens when people bury their head in the sand and dont stand up for themselves.  These people just accept whatever comes their way and dont really care too much about anything or anyone. 


   Which is the Cause and which is the Effect???

good question, I think those people were that way before the Dutch came along

Hard to tell.  Deportation seems to be a stabling factor..for the ruling class anyway.  If you 'buck the system' you are sent back to where you came from.  And, by 'buck the system' I am not talking about breaking any laws.  I think in Aruba they have to "go along to get along".



Who really rules Aruba??????

the mafia


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Auntiem on August 04, 2007, 01:37:53 PM
  Well at least they were in control of their island.  And who brought the drug trade and slave trade?  Was it the Natives, or was it the intruders who decided to take over and exploit the island for all it's worth?  Who is getting rich on the island and who is being treated like second class citizens?

I'm pretty sure the Dutch brought the slave trade, but i think the drugs (at least pot and cocaine) has probably been there all along, especially give Aruba's proximity to Venezuala.  I think the mentality of the natives goes back to before the Dutch came along.

But I blame the natives for not fighting for their rights and allowing things to get so out of control on "their" island.




Didn't someone post a link here to Aruba's history?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Auntiem on August 04, 2007, 01:39:39 PM
  The Dutch have kept those people down and they don't even know it.  I also believe that the Dutch who go there to  live are Flunkies from the NL who can't make it there and cane be big fish on that lil hell hole!!

I dont know if I really blame the Dutch as much as the people who stay drunk or stoned 24/7 and live this lifestyle of not really caring whats going on in their community.  The Dutch do seem to take advantage of these idiots, but hey, thats what happens when people bury their head in the sand and dont stand up for themselves.  These people just accept whatever comes their way and dont really care too much about anything or anyone. 


   Which is the Cause and which is the Effect???

good question, I think those people were that way before the Dutch came along

Hard to tell.  Deportation seems to be a stabling factor..for the ruling class anyway.  If you 'buck the system' you are sent back to where you came from.  And, by 'buck the system' I am not talking about breaking any laws.  I think in Aruba they have to "go along to get along".



Who really rules Aruba??????

the mafia



   They're done for!!!!!


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 04, 2007, 01:40:43 PM
   I believe Joran has "a little bit of knowledge" regarding the South....and we all know how a little bit of knowledge is a dangerous thing.....Either that or the schools on Aruba are back a few centuries and he is caught up in Ante-Bellum South thinking....ergo he thought Natalee was a Southern Belle from a Plantation!!!  What an idiot....   Maybe we should send them some updated history books!!!! :-?

I think that it's the island that has a race problem... notice joran keeps trying to place the blame on black security guards, black tourists, etc.   
He just assumed that a white girl would be into this way of thinking... that here in the US it wouldn't be questioned, the media seems to love to crank up the race issue...

The media will crank up the race issue if it's white on black, not the other way around. 

I think Joran's family and education has led him to this belief about people from Alabama and all of the implications he has made toward black people was meant to trap Natalee's family into believing him.  He thinks that is what all southerners do...blame the blacks.  He is wrong about that and Beth knew immediately that he security guards were innocent and said so.
Hi Monkeys
I agree,and isn't this the same that Karin Janssen tried to do with her letter to our State department inquiring about Beth's relationship to Hitler?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Auntiem on August 04, 2007, 01:42:27 PM
    I don't know about Beth's mother, but Reynolds is an Irish name.  Hitler was Austrian!


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 04, 2007, 01:45:32 PM
    I don't know about Beth's mother, but Reynolds is an Irish name.  Hitler was Austrian!

The whole Hitler thing is rediculous anyway


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Auntiem on August 04, 2007, 01:51:49 PM
   another one of Joran's stories from his messed up idea of American history.  I think he learned a little bit of the Civil War and WWII in comic books.... :lol: :lol:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Easywriter on August 04, 2007, 01:52:37 PM
    I don't know about Beth's mother, but Reynolds is an Irish name.  Hitler was Austrian!

The whole Hitler thing is rediculous anyway

If Natalee had worn a T-Shirt that said “My Mom is Hitler’s Sister” WTH difference would it have made in this investigation?  Those people chose to believe Joran’s slams against his victim and chose to ignore the things that incriminate him in any number of crimes.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: blah on August 04, 2007, 01:53:53 PM
FOXNEWS

NATO airstrike reportedly kills senior Taliban leader


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on August 04, 2007, 01:55:15 PM


Who really rules Aruba??????

the mafia

If the mafia (cartel) really rules Aruba it's because they are allowed to.  So who allows this?  Holland?  Fredis?  Oduber?  R. Croes?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on August 04, 2007, 01:56:36 PM
FOXNEWS

NATO airstrike reportedly kills senior Taliban leader
:smt038 :smt038 :smt038 :smt038 :smt038


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: blah on August 04, 2007, 01:58:02 PM


Who really rules Aruba??????

the mafia

If the mafia (cartel) really rules Aruba it's because they are allowed to.  So who allows this?  Holland?  Fredis?  Oduber?  R. Croes?

i think its basically a partnership with all of the above


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Auntiem on August 04, 2007, 01:58:25 PM
   I have FOX on they are talking about Bridge  what do u hav e on Blah???


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on August 04, 2007, 01:58:35 PM
   another one of Joran's stories from his messed up idea of American history.  I think he learned a little bit of the Civil War and WWII in comic books.... :lol: :lol:

The Hitler comment was to make sure the Dutch were against Natalee.  Joran was using the full extent of his education to create his lies.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: blah on August 04, 2007, 01:59:41 PM
FOXNEWS

NATO airstrike reportedly kills senior Taliban leader
:smt038 :smt038 :smt038 :smt038 :smt038

may be days weeks or months before we get the name, if I heard that correctly.  I'm multi-multi tasking right now  :lol:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: blah on August 04, 2007, 02:00:50 PM
  I have FOX on they are talking about Bridge  what do u hav e on Blah???

foxnews, they were talking about the bridge just before news of the airstrike.  Now they talking about the bridge and Bush again


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Auntiem on August 04, 2007, 02:01:01 PM
FOXNEWS

NATO airstrike reportedly kills senior Taliban leader
:smt038 :smt038 :smt038 :smt038 :smt038
[/quote




 Two senior leaders killed in Afganistan!!! :smt070 :smt070 :cheers: :cheers:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Auntiem on August 04, 2007, 02:01:57 PM
  That's ALL they are saying????? :-? :-? :-?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 04, 2007, 02:04:36 PM
  That's ALL they are saying????? :-? :-? :-?

Nato airstrike kills senior Taliban leaders
By Tom Coghlan in Bermal, Paktika Province
Last Updated: 2:29am BST 04/08/2007



Nato is reported to have killed at least two senior Taliban leaders in an airstrike north of Helmand as they were watching a public execution.

The bombing took place in the northern district of Baghran on Thursday, a district entirely controlled by the Taliban.

The Taliban's commander for southern Afghanistan, Mansoor Dadullah, was among those targeted, according to unconfirmed reports.


The Afghan Defence Ministry said that the airstrike took place as Taliban leaders gathered to watch the public hanging of several alleged government spies.

Dadullah replaced his older brother Mullah Dadullah Akhund after he was killed by the Special Boat Service (SBS) in Helmand on May 17th.

The younger Dadullah was interviewed by Channel 4 last week promising a wave of kidnaps of foreigners in the province. He threatened to have them beheaded by child executioners.

The Afghan defence ministry claimed that intelligence reports indicated the presence of Mansoor Dadullah at the targeted meeting. The senior Taliban commander for Helmand, Mullah Rahim, was also reported killed.

Doctors in the provincial capital Lashkar Gah reported that 20 people were admitted to the main hospital from Baghran district, ranging in age from eight to 50 years old, while Kandahar hospital also admitted 12 men.

Nasibullah, one of the injured, said the bomb hit a crowded market killing dozens of civilians and that no Taliban were in the area.

One military source, who did not wish to be named denied allegations of civilian casualties.

"We are 100 per cent clear that this was entirely Taliban. Those in hospital are fighting age males. This is the Taliban trying to cover the fact that they got caught out."

A statement put out by the US-led coalition in Afghanistan last night said that it had targeted two "notorious Taliban commanders": "During a sizable meeting of senior Taliban commanders, coalition forces employed precision-guided munitions on their location after ensuring there were no innocent Afghans in the surrounding area."

Nato has systematically targeted the Taliban leadership with airstrikes for the past year and claims to have seriously depleted the Taliban's command and control structure. According to figures collated by Western diplomats in Kabul, around 45 middle and high level Taliban commanders in Helmand have been killed to date.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/08/04/wafg104.xml
 


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 04, 2007, 02:11:11 PM
http://wizbangblog.com/content/2005/06/11/natalee-hollowa.php

Very short article in the above link. Some interesting comments after...ESPECIALLY THIS ONE>>>>>>>>>>

What happened that night. These three friends mixed the date rape drug in the girls drink. They had previously raped several girls. This one after drinked over dosed and suffered cardiac arrest.
They dumped her in the sea.

They are murderes and rapeist.

31. Posted by what happened | June 19, 2005 3:35 AM


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 04, 2007, 02:14:34 PM
    I don't know about Beth's mother, but Reynolds is an Irish name.  Hitler was Austrian!

The whole Hitler thing is rediculous anyway

IF ... and I stress ... IF Natalee Holloway refered to her mother as Hitler's sister it was in all probability a teenager complaining about her controlling mother.

Hey ... if the truth were know ... I can just imagine when my eldest son was a teenage what he called his father and me in regards to the  control issue when he was with his friends.  You know ... he was right ... we were controlling.  Our son was too precious to us to be let loose on a long leash ... to make immature decisions that had the ability to negatively affect the rest of his life and ... the lives of others.

Today he is now 37 years old and ... fully appreciates the uncompromising stand of his parents when he was a teen.  He is married with a beautiful almost one year son.  Payback time is coming in about 14 more years!

Janet


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Auntiem on August 04, 2007, 02:15:12 PM
Re NATO Air Strike TY Klaas !


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Auntiem on August 04, 2007, 02:21:55 PM
    Tamikosmom, my eldest daughter thought I was the mother from he@@, now that she and her husband have a little girl, they tell me that she will not be going on a date until she is THIRTY-FIVE!!!! :) :)


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 04, 2007, 02:24:18 PM
Running to the store, will be back in a bit


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: oldfart on August 04, 2007, 02:24:27 PM
Just checking on something
?? Attachement of a file --- Is the 1024kb size still the max?
What happens if over that ?  No post which would be Ok.. or only a partial file is posted ??

TIA   and HI


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on August 04, 2007, 02:24:58 PM
Running to the store, will be back in a bit

Will you pick me up a gallon of milk?   :lol:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 04, 2007, 02:26:16 PM
See you later MONKEYS>... gotta go and be productive, whatever that means...  :lol:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: MuffyBee on August 04, 2007, 02:47:06 PM
FOXNEWS

NATO airstrike reportedly kills senior Taliban leader

That's good.  Only problem is, when one is taken out, there is one right behind to take their place.  But if it serves to throw them off even for a bit, that's good.  I think their worst enemy is themselves.  They can't get along, and are so busy fighting over which is right, sunni or shia and for power they just can't get it together, of which I am grateful.  JMO, of course


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on August 04, 2007, 02:54:30 PM
UN TAL JEFFREY ARMA CU MACHETE RIBA DAK NA TANKI LEENDERT
ORANJESTAD (AAN): Na dos ocacion a seńala un tipo bisti full na cora den ta circula den bario di Tanki Leendert cu intencionnan menos bon.

Marduga segun e relato policial ta menciona presencia di polis a worde rekeri na un cas di famia na Tanki Leendert. E informe ricibi pa central di polis ta indica cu a seńala un homber cu machete den su man riba dak di cas.

http://www.diario-aruba.com/2007/8/4/
++++++++++++++++
Can't really make out this article , anyone have a pap translator handy?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: wreck on August 04, 2007, 03:10:56 PM
Catching up --- refrigerated condiments if sealed and refrigerated aren't gonna kill ya. "Shelf-life" refers to their "quality" of taste primarily. Frozen food varies by product -- but "shelf-life" refers mostly to freezer burn susceptibility. After a period of time -- products tend to go bland -- but they're not gonna hurt you. Use the "smell" test. That said, if you don't personally feel comfortable with something -- then don't use it. "Best by dates" are primarily there to scare you into re-buying more of their products. (I've been in the food business for years.) (**disclaimer --- I am basing this on items you use at home where you KNOW the products "history" --ie. how long it sat out unrefrigerated before you put it back in the fridge!) :shock:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: igsigs on August 04, 2007, 03:23:30 PM
STOM   :!:

Good to see you. Have you been following the case? The cold-case (KLPD) team? Do you see any type of resolution coming? TIA.



Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 04, 2007, 03:30:18 PM
UN TAL JEFFREY ARMA CU MACHETE RIBA DAK NA TANKI LEENDERT
ORANJESTAD (AAN): Na dos ocacion a seńala un tipo bisti full na cora den ta circula den bario di Tanki Leendert cu intencionnan menos bon.

Marduga segun e relato policial ta menciona presencia di polis a worde rekeri na un cas di famia na Tanki Leendert. E informe ricibi pa central di polis ta indica cu a seńala un homber cu machete den su man riba dak di cas.

http://www.diario-aruba.com/2007/8/4/
++++++++++++++++
Can't really make out this article , anyone have a pap translator handy?

Some dude named Jeffrey w/ a machete in his hand on top of a roof...
one such jeffrey arm cu machete on roof at tanki leendert oranjestad (aan): at two ocacion owing to seńala one type dress full at cora in is circula in district of tanki leendert cu intencionnan less good. marduga according the relato policial is menciona presencia of police owing to worde rekeri at one cas of family at tanki leendert. the informe ricibi for central of police is indica cu owing to seńala one man cu machete in his hand on roof of cas. come across


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: sirensong on August 04, 2007, 03:57:01 PM
The FBI was at his home at night, but he wasn't there. His father phoned as to where he was, Joran said in the Radisson Casino. He told that after the phone call he was called by Deepak and that Deepak picked him
up a few minutes later. They drove to Jorans house. The FBI and family of
the girl were at his home.


The above was from the translation of Joran's book.  Weren't they together when Paulus called?  Now all of sudden Deepak called and picked him up?

Good Afternoon all you monkeys!  I get so upset reading Joran BS, knowing the police know everything and have done nothing.  Lying POS.  And they know he did it.  I believe the casino owners, part of ATA, have too much power.  In reading Shango's posts, I think he was trying to simply tell us the drug lords, casino owners, prostitute providers, porn movie makers, drug dealers, didn't want the truth known, and every one was either paid off or given new jobs (like Dompig).   It was all about keeping secrets secret.  And if this news got out, (what really happened to Natalee) there would be no more tourists, and too mush attention from law enforcement from the US and countries trying to stop this crap.   I think all Joran's friends families felt threatened, not be ALE, but by the dark side that runs the island.  Unfortunately,  I don't think the KLPD is going to come up with anything either, I believe the Hague has dark siders in there too.  I was reading a thread on Scrux that talks about the higher ups and sex with underage kids going on. 


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: San on August 04, 2007, 04:11:50 PM
The FBI was at his home at night, but he wasn't there. His father phoned as to where he was, Joran said in the Radisson Casino. He told that after the phone call he was called by Deepak and that Deepak picked him
up a few minutes later. They drove to Jorans house. The FBI and family of
the girl were at his home.


The above was from the translation of Joran's book.  Weren't they together when Paulus called?  Now all of sudden Deepak called and picked him up?

Good Afternoon all you monkeys!  I get so upset reading Joran BS, knowing the police know everything and have done nothing.  Lying POS.  And they know he did it.  I believe the casino owners, part of ATA, have too much power.  In reading Shango's posts, I think he was trying to simply tell us the drug lords, casino owners, prostitute providers, porn movie makers, drug dealers, didn't want the truth known, and every one was either paid off or given new jobs (like Dompig).   It was all about keeping secrets secret.  And if this news got out, (what really happened to Natalee) there would be no more tourists, and too mush attention from law enforcement from the US and countries trying to stop this crap.   I think all Joran's friends families felt threatened, not be ALE, but by the dark side that runs the island.  Unfortunately,  I don't think the KLPD is going to come up with anything either, I believe the Hague has dark siders in there too.  I was reading a thread on Scrux that talks about the higher ups and sex with underage kids going on. 

I agree sirensong.  The only problem I had with Joran saying he called Deepak is that I believe they are all at the Sloot home and this is why it took Paulus a long time to answer the door.  No one takes that long to answer the door and I don't care how heavy of a sleeper you are.  If someone is at my door I just up right away to see what is going on.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: oldfart on August 04, 2007, 04:12:38 PM
The FBI was at his home at night, but he wasn't there. His father phoned as to where he was, Joran said in the Radisson Casino. He told that after the phone call he was called by Deepak and that Deepak picked him
up a few minutes later. They drove to Jorans house. The FBI and family of
the girl were at his home.


The above was from the translation of Joran's book.  Weren't they together when Paulus called?  Now all of sudden Deepak called and picked him up?

Good Afternoon all you monkeys!  I get so upset reading Joran BS, knowing the police know everything and have done nothing.  Lying POS.  And they know he did it.  I believe the casino owners, part of ATA, have too much power.  In reading Shango's posts, I think he was trying to simply tell us the drug lords, casino owners, prostitute providers, porn movie makers, drug dealers, didn't want the truth known, and every one was either paid off or given new jobs (like Dompig).   It was all about keeping secrets secret.  And if this news got out, (what really happened to Natalee) there would be no more tourists, and too mush attention from law enforcement from the US and countries trying to stop this crap.   I think all Joran's friends families felt threatened, not be ALE, but by the dark side that runs the island.  Unfortunately,  I don't think the KLPD is going to come up with anything either, I believe the Hague has dark siders in there too.  I was reading a thread on Scrux that talks about the higher ups and sex with underage kids going on. 


sirensong
Yup..  we have to hope the KLPD  is going to look at the long run....
Face facts... semi-clean things up 


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 04, 2007, 04:24:22 PM
The FBI was at his home at night, but he wasn't there. His father phoned as to where he was, Joran said in the Radisson Casino. He told that after the phone call he was called by Deepak and that Deepak picked him up a few minutes later. They drove to Jorans house. The FBI and family of he girl were at his home.


The above was from the translation of Joran's book.  Weren't they together when Paulus called?  Now all of sudden Deepak called and picked him up?

<snipped>



+++++++++++++++++++++++++
 
According to Deepak and Joran's declarations:

1.  Deepak and Joran were together when Paulus called to inform Joran that the Twitty group were at their residence.

2.  When Deepak and Joran arrived at the VDS residence ... NOBODY was there.

Janet




Deepak Kalpoe
Suspect Statement
June 11, 2005


Before I finished working, I had called him again. He said that at that time he was in the casino of the “Radisson Hotel”. I said that I would come to where he was.

Satish came and picked me up from work at approximately 23:10 hours at my place of work. I had brought Satish home because he had school the following day and also because my mother had been angry because we had stayed out late that day and that Satish hadn't gone to school. I then went to the “Radisson Hotel”. When I arrived there I met up with Joran, Guido and Andre. Joran was playing a poker tournament. I zat and watched. Joran was pretty inebriated that evening. We stayed there and played for about 2 hours after I arrived. I had arrived there at approximately 00;00 hours. At some point there was an altercation between a tourist and Joran. The tourist was of the opinion that we were helping Joran. We said to Joran that it was better if we would leave. We then left. Guido went away to take Andre home and me and Joran went to the “Wyndham” hotel11. I wanted to play blackjack. When we arrived at the “Wyndham” during parking Joran received a telephone call on his mobile. He spoke to a person. I heard him speak the name Paul. I assumed he was talking to his father.  I assumed he was talking to his father. Because I know his father's name is Paul. After the conversation Joran said to me that it had been his father calling and that he told him that there was police at their house and that it was about the girl that we had been out with the previous night.

<snipped>

When we arrived at Joran's house nobody was there.


Joran van der Sloot
Suspect Statement
June 14, 2005


At approximately 02.00 am I stopped playing. I had "cashed out" my chips. Deepak wanted to go and play black jack. I didn't know why but he wanted to go to the Wyndham Casino. According to him he had no luck at the Radisson Casino. At approximately 02.30 am, Deepak and myself were walking to his car. He was there in his Honda Civic. The car was parked in the parking lot of the Radisson Hotel. Guido left to take Andre home.

We drove towards the Wyndham Casino. When we were just about to get out of the car, my father called.
My father then told me that the police were at my house and that they were looking for a missing girl. I had then told my father that we would be coming to the house.

<snipped>

At approximately 03.00 am Deepak and myself arrived home in his Honda Civic. When we arrived there we could see no-one was there so I called my dad.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 04, 2007, 04:30:35 PM
Klaas ... I sent you an email.

Janet


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on August 04, 2007, 04:39:39 PM


Joran van der Sloot
Suspect Statement
June 14, 2005


At approximately 02.00 am I stopped playing. I had "cashed out" my chips. Deepak wanted to go and play black jack. I didn't know why but he wanted to go to the Wyndham Casino. According to him he had no luck at the Radisson Casino. At approximately 02.30 am, Deepak and myself were walking to his car. He was there in his Honda Civic. The car was parked in the parking lot of the Radisson Hotel. Guido left to take Andre home.

We drove towards the Wyndham Casino. When we were just about to get out of the car, my father called.
My father then told me that the police were at my house and that they were looking for a missing girl. I had then told my father that we would be coming to the house.

<snipped>

At approximately 03.00 am Deepak and myself arrived home in his Honda Civic. When we arrived there we could see no-one was there so I called my dad.

I think Joran DOES know why.  I thought this was strange that he says he doesn't know why, but then says it's because Deepak is not lucky at the Radisson.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 04, 2007, 04:41:43 PM
Klaas ... I sent you an email.

Janet

Ok..I'll check right now


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 04, 2007, 04:44:12 PM
Klaas ... I sent you an email.

Janet

Ok..I'll check right now

Did I do it right?  :wink:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 04, 2007, 04:47:11 PM
Klaas ... I sent you an email.

Janet

Ok..I'll check right now

Did I do it right?  :wink:

Nope!  Not completely.   :lol:

You move my intro but did not cut it from the original spot.

Thanks Klaas

Janet


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 04, 2007, 04:49:51 PM
Klaas ... I sent you an email.

Janet

Ok..I'll check right now

Did I do it right?  :wink:

Nope!  Not completely.   :lol:

You move my intro but did not cut it from the original spot.

Thanks Klaas

Janet

Better?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Buckeye on August 04, 2007, 04:50:00 PM
Dugga

Could we get one of those clocks (like Dana)....to use when Klaas runs to the store??   :wink:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 04, 2007, 04:52:30 PM
Dugga

Could we get one of those clocks (like Dana)....to use when Klaas runs to the store??   :wink:

You mean a flashing stop watch?  :lol:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Buckeye on August 04, 2007, 04:56:07 PM
Dugga

Could we get one of those clocks (like Dana)....to use when Klaas runs to the store??   :wink:

You mean a flashing stop watch?  :lol:

 :smt045 :smt045 :smt045


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 04, 2007, 04:58:01 PM
Klaas ... I sent you an email.

Janet

Ok..I'll check right now

Did I do it right?  :wink:

Nope!  Not completely.   :lol:

You move my intro but did not cut it from the original spot.

Thanks Klaas

Janet

Better?

PERFECT!!

Klaas ... could you please afford me the edit option.  I promise I will not tell the other Monkeys.  I realize jealousy is not a pretty picture.

Janet


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 04, 2007, 05:04:29 PM
Janet - LOL

I know the edit button is missed by many but it was also used maliciously in the past.  It's something we need to think about more before allowing again. 

I don't want people to do what Reality does at BFN and delete all their posts  :wink:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 04, 2007, 05:17:48 PM
Dilma Arends tells O’Reilly of cell phone usage…says Joran home at 4 A.M. per records of cell phone sites and cell phone batteries.

http://nhcasenotes.proboards99.com/index.cgi?board=juneone&action=display&thread=1165852338&page=1
Guest: Reporter Dilma Arends
Aruba investigative reporter Dilma Arends elaborated on the Natalee Holloway investigation, implying that Aruba authorities may have a stronger case than many people realize. "Aruba authorities have been using cell sites and the cell phone batteries to determine the movement of the boys involved. For example, they were able to determine that Joren Van Der Sloot got home at 4 AM. So I think they have more proof than they are telling us." The Factor asserted that Arends' claims will provide comfort to Natalee's family. "What you just told us makes a difference to the Holloway family because it gives them some hope. There should be a way for the government to get more information to the family that is not going to damage the case."

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Forum.....
http://nhcasenotes.proboards99.com/index.cgi
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Bunches of stuff>>> GENERAL BOARD
http://nhcasenotes.proboards99.com/index.cgi?board=general

Anyone know who this board belongs to?



Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 04, 2007, 05:35:16 PM
Janet - LOL

I know the edit button is missed by many but it was also used maliciously in the past.  It's something we need to think about more before allowing again. 

I don't want people to do what Reality does at BFN and delete all their posts  :wink:


Were people only allowed to edit their own posts? If so...how did things go bad, if I may ask.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: San on August 04, 2007, 05:38:50 PM
Janet - LOL

I know the edit button is missed by many but it was also used maliciously in the past.  It's something we need to think about more before allowing again. 

I don't want people to do what Reality does at BFN and delete all their posts  :wink:


Were people only allowed to edit their own posts? If so...how did things go bad, if I may ask.

Certain people edited their posts and removed information they provided (pictures).


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: BTgirl on August 04, 2007, 05:44:13 PM
Hi monkeys. I would just like to say to any non-monkey who thinks I am a member of the KKK that I spent the afternoon at a predominantly black church attending the wedding of a black couple and had a great time. So put that in your pipe and smoke it.  ;)

They are a middle-aged couple and seemed much more relaxed about the whole thing than most young couples generally are. There was lots of laughter and silliness and applause during the wedding ceremony, and it was loads of fun.  :D


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: oldfart on August 04, 2007, 05:45:54 PM
Hi monkeys. I would just like to say to any non-monkey who thinks I am a member of the KKK that I spent the afternoon at a predominantly black church attending the wedding of a black couple and had a great time. So put that in your pipe and smoke it.  ;)

They are a middle-aged couple and seemed much more relaxed about the whole thing than most young couples generally are. There was lots of laughter and silliness and applause during the wedding ceremony, and it was loads of fun.  :D

Hey BT   what is up   :shock:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: BTgirl on August 04, 2007, 05:58:21 PM
Hi monkeys. I would just like to say to any non-monkey who thinks I am a member of the KKK that I spent the afternoon at a predominantly black church attending the wedding of a black couple and had a great time. So put that in your pipe and smoke it.  ;)

They are a middle-aged couple and seemed much more relaxed about the whole thing than most young couples generally are. There was lots of laughter and silliness and applause during the wedding ceremony, and it was loads of fun.  :D

Hey BT   what is up   :shock:

Nothing really up, OF. You know, there are some posters at some other sites who call us the monkkkeys and say we're all part of the KKK.  :lol:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: NYC_lover on August 04, 2007, 06:07:24 PM
Mrs. Red, do u got my email?
With the link!


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: oldfart on August 04, 2007, 06:18:34 PM
Hi monkeys. I would just like to say to any non-monkey who thinks I am a member of the KKK that I spent the afternoon at a predominantly black church attending the wedding of a black couple and had a great time. So put that in your pipe and smoke it.  ;)

They are a middle-aged couple and seemed much more relaxed about the whole thing than most young couples generally are. There was lots of laughter and silliness and applause during the wedding ceremony, and it was loads of fun.  :D

Hey BT   what is up   :shock:

Nothing really up, OF. You know, there are some posters at some other sites who call us the monkkkeys and say we're all part of the KKK.  :lol:

Sorry BT
I was off playing and then had to log back in...
I do not read (very often) at those places to see If they happen on some info.. 
and just kinda skim over stuff that is copied to here  anymore.
I do not know or do I care to know if I have ever been quoted there.

Out side of being other human beings on this earth ... I really do not give a chit about most of them or what they have to say   JMO of course


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Easywriter on August 04, 2007, 06:24:24 PM
Hi monkeys. I would just like to say to any non-monkey who thinks I am a member of the KKK that I spent the afternoon at a predominantly black church attending the wedding of a black couple and had a great time. So put that in your pipe and smoke it.  ;)

They are a middle-aged couple and seemed much more relaxed about the whole thing than most young couples generally are. There was lots of laughter and silliness and applause during the wedding ceremony, and it was loads of fun.  :D

Hey BT   what is up   :shock:

Nothing really up, OF. You know, there are some posters at some other sites who call us the monkkkeys and say we're all part of the KKK.  :lol:

Now they will call you a spy!   :shock:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: oldfart on August 04, 2007, 06:24:51 PM
Tap...
Tap....Tap

Hellooooo


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 04, 2007, 06:27:11 PM
Hi monkeys. I would just like to say to any non-monkey who thinks I am a member of the KKK that I spent the afternoon at a predominantly black church attending the wedding of a black couple and had a great time. So put that in your pipe and smoke it.  ;)

They are a middle-aged couple and seemed much more relaxed about the whole thing than most young couples generally are. There was lots of laughter and silliness and applause during the wedding ceremony, and it was loads of fun.  :D

Hey BT   what is up   :shock:

Nothing really up, OF. You know, there are some posters at some other sites who call us the monkkkeys and say we're all part of the KKK.  :lol:


Yep...Charlierat nicknamed me NutKKxK the other day  :roll:  Nothing could be further from the truth.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Easywriter on August 04, 2007, 06:31:03 PM
Hi monkeys. I would just like to say to any non-monkey who thinks I am a member of the KKK that I spent the afternoon at a predominantly black church attending the wedding of a black couple and had a great time. So put that in your pipe and smoke it.  ;)

They are a middle-aged couple and seemed much more relaxed about the whole thing than most young couples generally are. There was lots of laughter and silliness and applause during the wedding ceremony, and it was loads of fun.  :D

Hey BT   what is up   :shock:

Nothing really up, OF. You know, there are some posters at some other sites who call us the monkkkeys and say we're all part of the KKK.  :lol:


Yep...Charlierat nicknamed me NutKKxK the other day  :roll:  Nothing could be further from the truth.

That guy has a fixation on that group for some reason.  Must be something out of his past.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: San on August 04, 2007, 06:36:36 PM
Why do people care what Charlierat thinks of them.  I could care less what he thinks of me.  The guy is a waste of life who stalks everyone on internet boards.  By the looks of Charlies photos he has some other issues that he isn't telling his buddies on other sites and my suggestion to them is give as little personal information as you can this man. :silent:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 04, 2007, 06:38:22 PM
Why do people care what Charlierat thinks of them.  I could care less what he thinks of me.  The guy is a waste of life who stalks everyone on internet boards.  By the looks of Charlies photos he has some other issues that he isn't telling his buddies on other sites and my suggestion to them is give as little personal information as you can this man. :silent:

What she said ^


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on August 04, 2007, 06:48:56 PM
Why do people care what Charlierat thinks of them.  I could care less what he thinks of me.  The guy is a waste of life who stalks everyone on internet boards.  By the looks of Charlies photos he has some other issues that he isn't telling his buddies on other sites and my suggestion to them is give as little personal information as you can this man. :silent:



:smt041 :smt041 :smt041


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 04, 2007, 07:09:48 PM
Why do people care what Charlierat thinks of them.  I could care less what he thinks of me.  The guy is a waste of life who stalks everyone on internet boards.  By the looks of Charlies photos he has some other issues that he isn't telling his buddies on other sites and my suggestion to them is give as little personal information as you can this man. :silent:


I did not say I cared. I was just going along with the conversation. I could care less what anyone thinks of me...especially anyone from those sites. I also agree with you on your last sentence !!! BIG TIME!  :smt028


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on August 04, 2007, 07:13:58 PM
Hi monkeys. I would just like to say to any non-monkey who thinks I am a member of the KKK that I spent the afternoon at a predominantly black church attending the wedding of a black couple and had a great time. So put that in your pipe and smoke it.  ;)

They are a middle-aged couple and seemed much more relaxed about the whole thing than most young couples generally are. There was lots of laughter and silliness and applause during the wedding ceremony, and it was loads of fun.  :D

Did I hear KKK?  :smt068


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on August 04, 2007, 07:15:04 PM
Did I hear Charlierat?  :smt067


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: MuffyBee on August 04, 2007, 07:16:05 PM
Did I hear Charlierat?  :smt067

Hi Monkeys!

BB have you been taking lessons from San (aka Boom-Boom)?  You were quick on the draw :lol:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: oldfart on August 04, 2007, 07:16:10 PM
Hi monkeys. I would just like to say to any non-monkey who thinks I am a member of the KKK that I spent the afternoon at a predominantly black church attending the wedding of a black couple and had a great time. So put that in your pipe and smoke it.  ;)

They are a middle-aged couple and seemed much more relaxed about the whole thing than most young couples generally are. There was lots of laughter and silliness and applause during the wedding ceremony, and it was loads of fun.  :D

Did I hear KKK?  :smt068

Seems as if BT was reading some place w/o my bag of Salt or w/o a wet suit today.



Hey BB


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 04, 2007, 07:17:12 PM
I did find something that disturbed me today though...

http://thinkquest.epn.net/agenda.php?action=fullnews&showcomments=1&id=7


on this site there is a post from some jerk calling themselves 'Natalee Holloway'.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: MuffyBee on August 04, 2007, 07:18:21 PM
I did find something that disturbed me today though...

http://thinkquest.epn.net/agenda.php?action=fullnews&showcomments=1&id=7


on this site there is a post from some jerk calling themselves 'Natalee Holloway'.

Nut44x4 that must have been very disturbing to see a post where someone uses Natalee's name :sad: :sad:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 04, 2007, 07:20:09 PM
I did find something that disturbed me today though...

http://thinkquest.epn.net/agenda.php?action=fullnews&showcomments=1&id=7


on this site there is a post from some jerk calling themselves 'Natalee Holloway'.

Nut44x4 that must have been very disturbing to see a post where someone uses Natalee's name :sad: :sad:


Actually I have seen it used many times before...but not on an educational site. People that play those linds of head games are mentally ill.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 04, 2007, 07:21:58 PM
kinds 2


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: oldfart on August 04, 2007, 07:26:35 PM
NUT44x4
It may have been just me   but that link just locked up my IE. 7 big time...


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on August 04, 2007, 07:27:40 PM
Hi, I'm way back catching up, but Mrs. Red gave NYC_Lover the wrong email address for Klaasend on the last thread.  Just happened to notice because I've typed it wrong myself a few times.

Just thought I'd mention, if it's not been straightened out.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 04, 2007, 07:28:41 PM
NUT44x4
It may have been just me   but that link just locked up my IE. 7 big time...

Me too


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 04, 2007, 07:30:00 PM
Hi, I'm way back catching up, but Mrs. Red gave NYC_Lover the wrong email address for Klaasend on the last thread.  Just happened to notice because I've typed it wrong myself a few times.

Just thought I'd mention, if it's not been straightened out.

Actually she really didn't.  It's kind of confusing.  I actually have a SM email now:
klaasend@scaredmonkeys.com

That email forwards to my new hotmail:  smklaas@hotmail.com

I still also have:  smklaasend@hotmail.com

 :lol:

Edited to add:  I emailed NYC_Lover anyway just to make sure she got Mrs. Red's email address.  It's taken care of.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Sue on August 04, 2007, 07:49:18 PM
Hi monkeys. I would just like to say to any non-monkey who thinks I am a member of the KKK that I spent the afternoon at a predominantly black church attending the wedding of a black couple and had a great time. So put that in your pipe and smoke it.  ;)

They are a middle-aged couple and seemed much more relaxed about the whole thing than most young couples generally are. There was lots of laughter and silliness and applause during the wedding ceremony, and it was loads of fun.  :D

Hey BT   what is up   :shock:

Nothing really up, OF. You know, there are some posters at some other sites who call us the monkkkeys and say we're all part of the KKK.  :lol:


Well I guess if that was true we all would have taken that island by storm


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: oldfart on August 04, 2007, 07:51:30 PM
Hi Sue    :smt006


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 04, 2007, 07:53:10 PM
NUT44x4
It may have been just me   but that link just locked up my IE. 7 big time...

Me too


It loads for me but it is wayyyyy slow in doing so. There are a lot of huge pictures (not porn ones). It took me forever to to load it. Slow scrolling too. Nothing much to see other than someone posted a reply to the article in her name...pissed me off. Also found something else today, but I can't post it here (it is pink prod. related, I believe) I also have a question...anyone remember any people talking about Natalee being located near 'frogs'>??


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 04, 2007, 07:58:35 PM
I did find something that disturbed me today though...

http://thinkquest.epn.net/agenda.php?action=fullnews&showcomments=1&id=7


on this site there is a post from some jerk calling themselves 'Natalee Holloway'.

Nut44x4 that must have been very disturbing to see a post where someone uses Natalee's name :sad: :sad:


Actually I have seen it used many times before...but not on an educational site. People that play those linds of head games are mentally ill.

NUT - I think that's a spambot using Natalee's name on that site


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 04, 2007, 08:09:21 PM
I did find something that disturbed me today though...

http://thinkquest.epn.net/agenda.php?action=fullnews&showcomments=1&id=7


on this site there is a post from some jerk calling themselves 'Natalee Holloway'.

Nut44x4 that must have been very disturbing to see a post where someone uses Natalee's name :sad: :sad:


Actually I have seen it used many times before...but not on an educational site. People that play those linds of head games are mentally ill.

NUT - I think that's a spambot using Natalee's name on that site


Many comment replies are...(not all) and the website after the name is>>>  http://hometown.aol.com/xg7c0toj/natalee-holloway
It is no longer active. This is way different than many other places I have seen where spam bots use popular names to get people to come into their site...anyway, the aol site is a dead link so it doesn't matter.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: IBE on August 04, 2007, 08:14:09 PM
supposedly Geraldo, on now on Fox News Channel, will cover news on the Donna Jou search or lack of search


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Sue on August 04, 2007, 08:15:13 PM
Hi Sue    :smt006

Well Hi Ya Old Fart :) good to see you :)


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 04, 2007, 08:16:10 PM
supposedly Geraldo, on now on Fox News Channel, will cover news on the Donna Jou search or lack of search

Thanks IBE!


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on August 04, 2007, 08:24:30 PM
Hi, I'm way back catching up, but Mrs. Red gave NYC_Lover the wrong email address for Klaasend on the last thread.  Just happened to notice because I've typed it wrong myself a few times.

Just thought I'd mention, if it's not been straightened out.

Actually she really didn't.  It's kind of confusing.  I actually have a SM email now:
klaasend@scaredmonkeys.com

That email forwards to my new hotmail:  smklaas@hotmail.com

I still also have:  smklaasend@hotmail.com

 :lol:

Edited to add:  I emailed NYC_Lover anyway just to make sure she got Mrs. Red's email address.  It's taken care of.

 :2doh: :2doh: My eyes and brain didn't see the SM email...just had the hotmail on the brain...glad it's straightened out.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on August 04, 2007, 08:30:36 PM
Oldfart,

Regarding your post about attachment size....I had posted a monkey picture yesterday on last thread.  I wasn't sure the picture was too big, but never checked the requirements.  When I posted, I got the IE 'there was a problem and will have to shut down' message.  Thought maybe I had made a boo boo, but when I opened a new browser, my post was okay...nobody said they fixed it...so I guess my picture wasn't oversized...I would think we should get some sort of message if the file is too large...but having worked with web stuff, I won't assume.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on August 04, 2007, 08:39:37 PM
Maybe I should change my avatar? 

BBL


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 04, 2007, 08:41:14 PM
Maybe I should change my avatar? 

BBL

LOL - no I think everyone is hanging out in the chat room.  I'm here and there, fixing dinner and trying to watch Geraldo.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: oldfart on August 04, 2007, 08:42:42 PM
Oldfart,

Regarding your post about attachment size....I had posted a monkey picture yesterday on last thread.  I wasn't sure the picture was too big, but never checked the requirements.  When I posted, I got the IE 'there was a problem and will have to shut down' message.  Thought maybe I had made a boo boo, but when I opened a new browser, my post was okay...nobody said they fixed it...so I guess my picture wasn't oversized...I would think we should get some sort of message if the file is too large...but having worked with web stuff, I won't assume.


Thanks 2NJ
I decided to post it... put go an error saying it was to large... about 5,000k  so I will look at other options..
BTW  is / are we going to get some report on how the wedding / meeting went... ?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Dugga on August 04, 2007, 08:43:21 PM
trying to watch Geraldo.

Yeah, that can be kind of hard to do sometimes.  :2rofl:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on August 04, 2007, 08:47:20 PM
trying to watch Geraldo.

Yeah, that can be kind of hard to do sometimes.  :2rofl:


:smt023


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: IBE on August 04, 2007, 08:49:31 PM
trying to watch Geraldo.

Yeah, that can be kind of hard to do sometimes.  :2rofl:


:smt023

Gee when,  I hope he gets to it for I have called many friends about it.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on August 04, 2007, 08:59:51 PM
trying to watch Geraldo.

Yeah, that can be kind of hard to do sometimes.  :2rofl:


:smt023

It's Geraldo, honey.  Wehave to be patient with Geraldo.

Gee when,  I hope he gets to it for I have called many friends about it.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on August 04, 2007, 09:00:26 PM
trying to watch Geraldo.

Yeah, that can be kind of hard to do sometimes.  :2rofl:


:smt023

It's Geraldo, honey.  Wehave to be patient with Geraldo.

Gee when,  I hope he gets to it for I have called many friends about it.

Well, I screwed that post up.

It's Geraldo, honey.  Wehave to be patient with Geraldo.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: oldfart on August 04, 2007, 09:01:38 PM
Well I caught the last part of the show...

Something about a  new web site..  and clips out of new films the nude scenes  :shock:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 04, 2007, 09:03:39 PM
IBE - he did finally get to it but didn't give it much time.  Donna's dad was on.  Nothing was said about TES.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: oldfart on August 04, 2007, 09:03:51 PM
Be Right Back...


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: IBE on August 04, 2007, 09:10:13 PM
The words I want to say now can not be put on the board :-x What a lame interview on Geraldo. And sex on the Internet by Mr. Skin was more important than a missing girl... Geeeeez

 Please check the Thread in Missing Persons about Donna Jou. Dana has recd. a communication, I think from the mom, about the lack of wanting TES by Orange County via LAPD. There are links to info there and a petition to get the man sent to CA.

What really t's me off is the question... is she considered missing in Orange County or West LA where the man lived??? When you hear all the news it seems Orange County, but I thought the last place alive was West LA. Where was the text message from ... no one, IMO, has ever said.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: oldfart on August 04, 2007, 09:13:59 PM
Thanks IBE
I will look for it... and YES   Geraldo  is a Media Maggot (trying to be nice and PC here)


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Artcolley on August 04, 2007, 09:16:28 PM
Hi Monkeys!

The thing that really irritates me with Geraldo is that he doesn't give anyone a chance to talk! He was especially bad tonight. I switched channels..I'd rather watch Law and Order reruns! :cool:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Artcolley on August 04, 2007, 09:17:59 PM
I need to go and check out the new "Chatroom" and see if I can keep up with it!


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: IBE on August 04, 2007, 09:18:31 PM
Yes, Klaas, I know background about the relationship or lack of a relationship between LE and TES that Mr. Miller told me, but I have to ask him if I can post it.

I thought it was going to be brought up on Geraldo's show and then, if needed, Monkeys could get activated. Right now we can sign the petition and go to the links listed on the Scared Monkeys Thread on Donna Jou.

I am really in a bad mood. The longer no body, the more decomposition and the lack of evidence!!! I do hope she is alive. I went out and took more pictures today and found some really isolated sites not to far from his home where no car would go at night.  geez I am t-d off.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: robots on August 04, 2007, 09:18:45 PM
i didnt see it
but geraldo makes me want to  :smt078


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Artcolley on August 04, 2007, 09:20:51 PM
Yes, Klaas, I know background about the relationship or lack of a relationship between LE and TES that Mr. Miller told me, but I have to ask him if I can post it.

I thought it was going to be brought up on Geraldo's show and then, if needed, Monkeys could get activated. Right now we can sign the petition and go to the links listed on the Scared Monkeys Thread on Donna Jou.

I am really in a bad mood. The longer no body, the more decomposition and the lack of evidence!!! I do hope she is alive. I went out and took more pictures today and found some really isolated sites not to far from his home where no car would go at night.  geez I am t-d off.

IBE, please be careful going to those isolated sites. I do hope you take someone with you.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 04, 2007, 09:23:23 PM
The words I want to say now can not be put on the board :-x What a lame interview on Geraldo. And sex on the Internet by Mr. Skin was more important than a missing girl... Geeeeez

 Please check the Thread in Missing Persons about Donna Jou. Dana has recd. a communication, I think from the mom, about the lack of wanting TES by Orange County via LAPD. There are links to info there and a petition to get the man sent to CA.

What really t's me off is the question... is she considered missing in Orange County or West LA where the man lived??? When you hear all the news it seems Orange County, but I thought the last place alive was West LA. Where was the text message from ... no one, IMO, has ever said.

IBE - thanks I'll go check out that thread now.  You are right, it was a lame interview and who give a CRA* about the Mr. Skin site.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on August 04, 2007, 09:23:30 PM
Yes, Klaas, I know background about the relationship or lack of a relationship between LE and TES that Mr. Miller told me, but I have to ask him if I can post it.

I thought it was going to be brought up on Geraldo's show and then, if needed, Monkeys could get activated. Right now we can sign the petition and go to the links listed on the Scared Monkeys Thread on Donna Jou.

I am really in a bad mood. The longer no body, the more decomposition and the lack of evidence!!! I do hope she is alive. I went out and took more pictures today and found some really isolated sites not to far from his home where no car would go at night.  geez I am t-d off.

IBE, please be careful going to those isolated sites. I do hope you take someone with you.

That's very good advice, Art.

I admire your passion, IBE.  Hopefully they will get TES there soon.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: oldfart on August 04, 2007, 09:24:01 PM
Yes, Klaas, I know background about the relationship or lack of a relationship between LE and TES that Mr. Miller told me, but I have to ask him if I can post it.

I thought it was going to be brought up on Geraldo's show and then, if needed, Monkeys could get activated. Right now we can sign the petition and go to the links listed on the Scared Monkeys Thread on Donna Jou.

I am really in a bad mood. The longer no body, the more decomposition and the lack of evidence!!! I do hope she is alive. I went out and took more pictures today and found some really isolated sites not to far from his home where no car would go at night.  geez I am t-d off.

IBE, please be careful going to those isolated sites. I do hope you take someone with you.

I was getting ready to same the same thing ART  :lol:   and IBE Please be safe...


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: SunFreak2 on August 04, 2007, 09:24:32 PM
Hello to all you fine monkeys!

It's a tops banana kind of day today.  Hope for you too!


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: oldfart on August 04, 2007, 09:25:09 PM
IBE
Do we / you / anyone know why they do not want to allow TES to assist???


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: IBE on August 04, 2007, 09:26:24 PM
Barf Barf... I feel like a drink but I can't go to the American Legion for they will tease me... I told everyone to watch Geraldo about new info on the search or lack of search.

I bet Geraldo had more and cut the interview in half/ barf barf I am going for a walk Be back in about 10 min. Even a neighbor is not too happy with me.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: windy city on August 04, 2007, 09:29:58 PM
Geraldo sucks almost as bad as ALE!   :-x


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: IBE on August 04, 2007, 09:31:16 PM
IBE
Do we / you / anyone know why they do not want to allow TES to assist???

yes, Tim Miller told me last night but I don't know if I can post them. I need to ask.

Oh, Tim Miller is in People magazine, he told me. Sure enough he is.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on August 04, 2007, 09:34:53 PM
IBE
Do we / you / anyone know why they do not want to allow TES to assist???

yes, Tim Miller told me last night but I don't know if I can post them. I need to ask.

Oh, Tim Miller is in People magazine, he told me. Sure enough he is.

I didn't know People magazine had stories about living angels.  Good to know.  I'll have to get a copy.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 04, 2007, 09:36:00 PM
IBE
Do we / you / anyone know why they do not want to allow TES to assist???

yes, Tim Miller told me last night but I don't know if I can post them. I need to ask.

Oh, Tim Miller is in People magazine, he told me. Sure enough he is.

Cool, he's in People Magazine?

IBE - yes, don't post what Tim told you unless you are absolutely certain it's OK.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: oldfart on August 04, 2007, 09:38:36 PM
Windy City
Geraldo is supposed to be there for us / the public... so that makes him worse than ALE  JMO of course


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on August 04, 2007, 09:43:27 PM
Windy City
Geraldo is supposed to be there for us / the public... so that makes him worse than ALE  JMO of course

I agree, OF.  The man totally creeps me out.  I just have a hard time watching him.  Can you imagine how hopeful that family was tonight that this would get more attention to help solve the case and to have to tune in and see how Wh@raldo covered it.  Man, that's cruel.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on August 04, 2007, 09:44:59 PM
Hello Monkeys.  If the new chat room achieves nothing else at least it makes the catch up reading a lot quicker owing to less posts here.  :lol:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: oldfart on August 04, 2007, 09:47:45 PM
Windy City
Geraldo is supposed to be there for us / the public... so that makes him worse than ALE  JMO of course

I agree, OF.  The man totally creeps me out.  I just have a hard time watching him.  Can you imagine how hopeful that family was tonight that this would get more attention to help solve the case and to have to tune in and see how Wh@raldo covered it.  Man, that's cruel.
TurthSeaker
Media Maggot or a Mediawh... or something else ???
Maggots only eat dead tissue... the other only wants the money  ... I think I was wrong in calling him a Maggot... he preys on the living


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Artcolley on August 04, 2007, 09:48:11 PM
Hello Monkeys.  If the new chat room achieves nothing else at least it makes the catch up reading a lot quicker owing to less posts here.  :lol:

You got that right! :lol:

I think my eyes are tired, I am not able to follow the chat very good tonight!
SO....I"ll hang here for a bit!


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: windy city on August 04, 2007, 09:48:36 PM
Windy City
Geraldo is supposed to be there for us / the public... so that makes him worse than ALE  JMO of course

I agree Mr. F

He lost me when he so sheepishly asked Beth to share statements she had with him.  Plus I cant stand his cheesy moustache.   :-x :-x


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Artcolley on August 04, 2007, 09:49:07 PM
Windy City
Geraldo is supposed to be there for us / the public... so that makes him worse than ALE  JMO of course

I agree, OF.  The man totally creeps me out.  I just have a hard time watching him.  Can you imagine how hopeful that family was tonight that this would get more attention to help solve the case and to have to tune in and see how Wh@raldo covered it.  Man, that's cruel.
TurthSeaker
Media Maggot or a Mediawh... or something else ???
Maggots only eat dead tissue... the other only wants the money  ... I think I was wrong in calling him a Maggot... he preys on the living

 :lol:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: oldfart on August 04, 2007, 09:49:11 PM
Hello Monkeys.  If the new chat room achieves nothing else at least it makes the catch up reading a lot quicker owing to less posts here.  :lol:

TIB
have you tried the "Print Button"  ??   Bottom of the page Right Side..
It will put the entire thread in print ready format that you can read through


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: IBE on August 04, 2007, 09:49:52 PM
Thank you for your concern.. am in full daylight. I do full, stop but quick pictures. Almost always with windows up. And look front, back and sides but you are always at risk.

The isolated sites are like in plain view in LA and a nearby city... just can be sooo isolated at night; but then again, today I was the only person on that one street.

I have my handy dandy dog, and my hand=dandy ROBOTS cell phone. Am familiar with that street in the mid-80s and 90's when an ex boyfriend owned 1/2 block of it and had his business there. All the land in some part of it and nearby buildings in and around on on one side are vacated because of CalTrans wanting, someday to put a light rail there around the RR tracks or where they have been dug out.

Only locals would know about this street mostly. It sure had a lot of gang graffiti on the street. but you find that all over here in some parts.

 I found it ironic at at the beginning of this lone street... only about 4+ blocks where the supposed suspect lived.. there is a motorcycle/scooter something at the corner. I drove around that block 4 times and never could quite figure out what kind of store/outdoor thing it was. PS..He drove a motorcycle.

When I talk to people in the city where I live where they'd hid a body, 99% give the area by his house and this other area unless you go into the LA city park up the hills and the oil wells or throw something in the desert.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Artcolley on August 04, 2007, 09:50:25 PM
Windy City
Geraldo is supposed to be there for us / the public... so that makes him worse than ALE  JMO of course

I agree Mr. F

He lost me when he so sheepishly asked Beth to share statements she had with him.  Plus I cant stand his cheesy moustache.   :-x :-x


:OMG, YES..that mustache is awful! Makes him look silly.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: oldfart on August 04, 2007, 09:52:03 PM
Windy City
Geraldo is supposed to be there for us / the public... so that makes him worse than ALE  JMO of course

I agree Mr. F

He lost me when he so sheepishly asked Beth to share statements she had with him.  Plus I cant stand his cheesy moustache.   :-x :-x

Windy City
There are NO  Mr. F  here that I know of..  :lol:   If you could.. make it OldF.. it would be nice...  Do you know how many posts have OF  in it  :lol: :lol:  when I try to search for anything someone asked ...of me..


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Artcolley on August 04, 2007, 09:53:03 PM
Thank you for your concern.. am in full daylight. I do full, stop but quick pictures. Almost always with windows up. And look front, back and sides but you are always at risk.

The isolated sites are like in plain view in LA and a nearby city... just can be sooo isolated at night; but then again, today I was the only person on that one street.

I have my handy dandy dog, and my hand=dandy ROBOTS cell phone. Am familiar with that street in the mid-80s and 90's when an ex boyfriend owned 1/2 block of it and had his business there. All the land in some part of it and nearby buildings in and around on on one side are vacated because of CalTrans wanting, someday to put a light rail there around the RR tracks or where they have been dug out.

Only locals would know about this street mostly. It sure had a lot of gang graffiti on the street. but you find that all over here in some parts.

 I found it ironic at at the beginning of this lone street... only about 4+ blocks where the supposed suspect lived.. there is a motorcycle/scooter something at the corner. I drove around that block 4 times and never could quite figure out what kind of store/outdoor thing it was. PS..He drove a motorcycle.

When I talk to people in the city where I live where they'd hid a body, 99% give the area by his house and this other area unless you go into the LA city park up the hills and the oil wells or throw something in the desert.

This is just so sad, IBE.
When will this craziness end?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: IBE on August 04, 2007, 09:53:30 PM
am still sooooo t-d off. Am going outside and clean part of my car.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: oldfart on August 04, 2007, 09:54:53 PM
am still sooooo t-d off. Am going outside and clean part of my car.

IBE
Can I bring mine over... If I leave now... I might be there  Tuesday sometime :lol:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: windy city on August 04, 2007, 09:56:35 PM
Windy City
Geraldo is supposed to be there for us / the public... so that makes him worse than ALE  JMO of course

I agree Mr. F

He lost me when he so sheepishly asked Beth to share statements she had with him.  Plus I cant stand his cheesy moustache.   :-x :-x

Windy City
There are NO  Mr. F  here that I know of..  :lol:   If you could.. make it OldF.. it would be nice...  Do you know how many posts have OF  in it  :lol: :lol:  when I try to search for anything someone asked ...of me..

You got it OldF.. I'm still trying to get aquainted with all you fine folks!  Always a pleasure to meet a fine citizen from Illinois!  Did your taxes go up this year like mine?   :P


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 04, 2007, 09:57:14 PM
Mrs. Red, do u got my email?
With the link!

NY I didn't get it.... :sad:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 04, 2007, 09:59:06 PM
Why do people care what Charlierat thinks of them.  I could care less what he thinks of me.  The guy is a waste of life who stalks everyone on internet boards.  By the looks of Charlies photos he has some other issues that he isn't telling his buddies on other sites and my suggestion to them is give as little personal information as you can this man. :silent:

AMEN SISTER SAN!!!! 


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: oldfart on August 04, 2007, 09:59:45 PM

You got it OldF.. I'm still trying to get aquainted with all you fine folks!  Always a pleasure to meet a fine citizen from Illinois!  Did your taxes go up this year like mine?   :P

Which taxes..   real estate ... Yes...  Tax on cigarettes yes  and prob. a few more since we do not have a budget YET


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on August 04, 2007, 09:59:54 PM
am still sooooo t-d off. Am going outside and clean part of my car.

IBE
Can I bring mine over... If I leave now... I might be there  Tuesday sometime :lol:


:smt082


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: IBE on August 04, 2007, 10:00:38 PM
am still sooooo t-d off. Am going outside and clean part of my car.

IBE
Can I bring mine over... If I leave now... I might be there  Tuesday sometime :lol:

It's a deal :lol: :lol: You bring the car and the roast and I'll do the rest and bake a desert. or spell dessert??? I can't even think straight BBL


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: IBE on August 04, 2007, 10:01:49 PM
Car wash fund raiser for TES at IBE's!!!! Bring your own whatevers :P


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: oldfart on August 04, 2007, 10:02:09 PM
am still sooooo t-d off. Am going outside and clean part of my car.

IBE
Can I bring mine over... If I leave now... I might be there  Tuesday sometime :lol:

It's a deal :lol: :lol: You bring the car and the roast and I'll do the rest and bake a desert. or spell dessert??? I can't even think straight BBL
:lol: :lol:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 04, 2007, 10:02:23 PM
Car wash fund raiser for TES at IBE's!!!! Bring your own whatevers :P

LOL  :lol:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on August 04, 2007, 10:02:52 PM
Welcome to our new monkeys.   

Ah, dear, dear Chuckrat.  How terribly sad that he has nothing better to do than bash other people.  Sometimes I actually feel sorry for those kind of people...sometimes...not all the time.

I see the chat is keeping the lively quiet.  That is the only drawback.  Everyone should try it at least once though.  It can be lots of fun. 


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: windy city on August 04, 2007, 10:03:31 PM

You got it OldF.. I'm still trying to get aquainted with all you fine folks!  Always a pleasure to meet a fine citizen from Illinois!  Did your taxes go up this year like mine?   :P

Which taxes..   real estate ... Yes...  Tax on cigarettes yes  and prob. a few more since we do not have a budget YET

Gas finally got below 3 bucks for regular today.  Damn near the highest in the country.  And werent these damn tollways supposed to be temp?  Now Rob is building more of them.   :-x :-x


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: IBE on August 04, 2007, 10:03:41 PM
TruthSeeker oops thought it was Old Fart who was bringing his car. He's the one with the roast. But you all come.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 04, 2007, 10:03:44 PM
Hello Monkeys.  If the new chat room achieves nothing else at least it makes the catch up reading a lot quicker owing to less posts here.  :lol:

... but I am so lonely.  Chatting is not my thing. I get sooo confused.  By the time I compose my thoughts ... type them out ... the topic has changed.  On the forum ... the same thing happens but ... I can quote so that others know what the heck I am talking about.  I know that I am always behind but ... that is the story of my life.  I have gotten use to it.   :)

I am off Monkeys.  Hubby and I are joining neighbours in walking our dogs and ... then a serious game of scrabble is where it is at.  Winning couple (combined scores) treats the other couple at our local Spill the Beans for a late night coffee and dessert.

Have a good evening all.

Janet

7:00 PM

I hope I am not missing some good stuff ...


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 04, 2007, 10:05:36 PM
Hello Monkeys.  If the new chat room achieves nothing else at least it makes the catch up reading a lot quicker owing to less posts here.  :lol:

... but I am so lonely.  Chatting is not my thing. I get sooo confused.  By the time I compose my thoughts ... type them out ... the topic has changed.  On the forum ... the same thing happens but ... I can quote so that others know what the heck I am talking about.  I know that I am always behind but ... that is the story of my life.  I have gotten use to it.   :)

I am off Monkeys.  Hubby and I are joining neighbours in walking our dogs and ... then a serious game of scrabble is where it is at.  Winning couple (combined scores) treats the other couple at our local Spill the Beans for a late night coffee and dessert.

Have a good evening all.

Janet

7:00 PM

I hope I am not missing some good stuff ...

Janet - I agree.  I'm only hanging out there to make sure nothing goes wrong.  I really don't like chat rooms.

Nite


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: oldfart on August 04, 2007, 10:05:41 PM
Welcome to our new monkeys.   

Ah, dear, dear Chuckrat.  How terribly sad that he has nothing better to do than bash other people.  Sometimes I actually feel sorry for those kind of people...sometimes...not all the time.

I see the chat is keeping the lively quiet.  That is the only drawback.  Everyone should try it at least once though.  It can be lots of fun. 

Lala's
I did find you.. or one of your helpers there


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: windy city on August 04, 2007, 10:05:50 PM
Correction.. Rod not Rob. (tells you how much I like him).  


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on August 04, 2007, 10:07:11 PM
TruthSeeker oops thought it was Old Fart who was bringing his car. He's the one with the roast. But you all come.

It was OldF, but he gave me the idea that I might just bring mine too!


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on August 04, 2007, 10:08:41 PM
'Nite Janet!!


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: oldfart on August 04, 2007, 10:09:25 PM
Correction.. Rod not Rob. (tells you how much I like him).  
OH you mean HotRod...  the Gov that has a mansion 15 min from me but wants to stay in Chicago... Fly back and forth    on MY dime...
Spfld has a small homeless problem... Why not let them use the masion ???


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on August 04, 2007, 10:09:29 PM
Welcome to our new monkeys.   

Ah, dear, dear Chuckrat.  How terribly sad that he has nothing better to do than bash other people.  Sometimes I actually feel sorry for those kind of people...sometimes...not all the time.

I see the chat is keeping the lively quiet.  That is the only drawback.  Everyone should try it at least once though.  It can be lots of fun. 

Lala's
I did find you.. or one of your helpers there

Can I use that in chat? 


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: oldfart on August 04, 2007, 10:12:28 PM
Welcome to our new monkeys.   

Ah, dear, dear Chuckrat.  How terribly sad that he has nothing better to do than bash other people.  Sometimes I actually feel sorry for those kind of people...sometimes...not all the time.

I see the chat is keeping the lively quiet.  That is the only drawback.  Everyone should try it at least once though.  It can be lots of fun. 

Lala's
I did find you.. or one of your helpers there

Can I use that in chat? 
You are asking Who / Whom ... that question?
I found it some  where in the Chat area.. Have no idea where now.
when I'm there I might as well be on the carinval  Tilt-A-Whirl, Scarmbler or something they called the Zippper ? :lol: :lol:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 04, 2007, 10:13:34 PM
Well I understand the Jou's are going to be on Nancy Grace also, I can't stand how these media people use these people's tradegy's for gain... and then leave them hanging.... makes me so mad... they cut Mr. Jou off and then came back to the bridge, which granted is an awful story... but dang, I could care less about hearing Mark Geragos talk about who to sue....


Klaas, I didn't get NY's email... she said earlier she sent it... would you mind emailing her to let her know?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: oldfart on August 04, 2007, 10:13:35 PM
G'nite Tamikosmom


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: windy city on August 04, 2007, 10:14:35 PM
Correction.. Rod not Rob. (tells you how much I like him).  
OH you mean HotRod...  the Gov that has a mansion 15 min from me but wants to stay in Chicago... Fly back and forth    on MY dime...
Spfld has a small homeless problem... Why not let them use the masion ???

I hear ya.  When I heard the airfare was like 6K round trip on the taxpayers I almost puked.  No wonder he was so against shutting down Miegs field!  Now he has to pay for parking!   :-x

Sorry monkeys,  I'll try to stay on topic but this governor is killing me!


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 04, 2007, 10:15:09 PM
Well I understand the Jou's are going to be on Nancy Grace also, I can't stand how these media people use these people's tradegy's for gain... and then leave them hanging.... makes me so mad... they cut Mr. Jou off and then came back to the bridge, which granted is an awful story... but dang, I could care less about hearing Mark Geragos talk about who to sue....


Klaas, I didn't get NY's email... she said earlier she sent it... would you mind emailing her to let her know?

I'll let her know.  I think she's gong to bed now.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on August 04, 2007, 10:18:01 PM
Has there been any word on Lorenzo?  Is he still in jail?  Has he been before a judge?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 04, 2007, 10:19:11 PM
thanks Klaas.... I went into chat but it kills my computer every time... besides I am not a big chatter.... myself.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: oldfart on August 04, 2007, 10:19:22 PM
Wind City
I gotta ask... are you from area around the Wind City ?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 04, 2007, 10:19:38 PM
Has there been any word on Lorenzo?  Is he still in jail?  Has he been before a judge?
According to Jossy he is still in jail.  Some believe he has a court date this week, I don't really know.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: oldfart on August 04, 2007, 10:21:01 PM
Has there been any word on Lorenzo?  Is he still in jail?  Has he been before a judge?

TruthSeaker
I have not seen anything here... not even copied from the sites that have "the inside dope"


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on August 04, 2007, 10:24:10 PM
Has there been any word on Lorenzo?  Is he still in jail?  Has he been before a judge?

TruthSeaker
I have not seen anything here... not even copied from the sites that have "the inside dope"

So Lorenzo continues to be a mystery man even after a public arrest. 


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: windy city on August 04, 2007, 10:24:21 PM
Has there been any word on Lorenzo?  Is he still in jail?  Has he been before a judge?

Hi truthseeker2.   The last report I read was from MF stating status quo.  MF also felt he would be detained for a while given the evidence.  MF is also about as credible as a wolf in a henhouse, imo.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 04, 2007, 10:24:48 PM
OK - I'm officially out of the chat room for a while.  Too many areas to watch.  They are on their own, lol  :lol:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: oldfart on August 04, 2007, 10:25:58 PM
OK - I'm officially out of the chat room for a while.  Too many areas to watch.  They are on their own, lol  :lol:

I wish I had a nice glass of wine to offer you... to make the world stop spinning  :lol:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: windy city on August 04, 2007, 10:27:27 PM
Wind City
I gotta ask... are you from area around the Wind City ?

SW suburbs... 30 minutes with no traffic.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: oldfart on August 04, 2007, 10:28:49 PM
Wind City
If you are from my state... and care to just talk  shoot me an e-mail at  unlucky@insightbb.com.   Just so that you and ANYONE else reading this a JUNK mail box that some time use.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Marlee on August 04, 2007, 10:29:00 PM
IBE
Do we / you / anyone know why they do not want to allow TES to assist???

yes, Tim Miller told me last night but I don't know if I can post them. I need to ask.

Oh, Tim Miller is in People magazine, he told me. Sure enough he is.

I didn't know People magazine had stories about living angels.  Good to know.  I'll have to get a copy.

I happened to pick up a People Magazine when i went to the store earlier.  Didn't know Tim was in it until now.  He is in the -----People Hero's Among Us----section.  Very nice almost full page pic of him.  He is certainly one of my Hero's!!!


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: windy city on August 04, 2007, 10:30:26 PM
OK - I'm officially out of the chat room for a while.  Too many areas to watch.  They are on their own, lol  :lol:

You are a trooper!   :)


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 04, 2007, 10:31:21 PM
SO is the article on Tim worth reading? If so, I will buy a people... if not, I won't...  :lol:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Marlee on August 04, 2007, 10:33:50 PM
SO is the article on Tim worth reading? If so, I will buy a people... if not, I won't...  :lol:

It's not very long.  Do you want me to scan it? Is that allowed?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: oldfart on August 04, 2007, 10:37:53 PM
SO is the article on Tim worth reading? If so, I will buy a people... if not, I won't...  :lol:

It's not very long.  Do you want me to scan it? Is that allowed?


Marlee
I'm pretty sure if you scan it  ... Send it to Mrs.. and do not charge her for it... you will not be violating any (or many) laws


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: San on August 04, 2007, 10:39:05 PM
SO is the article on Tim worth reading? If so, I will buy a people... if not, I won't...  :lol:

It's not very long.  Do you want me to scan it? Is that allowed?


Scanning is our friend :smt045


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: oldfart on August 04, 2007, 10:41:18 PM
I wonder if LaLa's is going to be trying to take names in the Chat room too. :smt107

If so I have this funny feeling she will come back here in a Nasty Mood ... just wanting to :2brickwall:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 04, 2007, 10:41:31 PM
SO is the article on Tim worth reading? If so, I will buy a people... if not, I won't...  :lol:

It's not very long.  Do you want me to scan it? Is that allowed?


Scanning is our friend :smt045

I agree with San... again.  Please scan it... sorry for the long time to reply I was reading the front page... LOL... red quizzes me.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 04, 2007, 10:42:06 PM
I wonder if LaLa's is going to be trying to take names in the Chat room too. :smt107

If so I have this funny feeling she will come back here in a Nasty Mood ... just wanting to :2brickwall:

why is it bad in there?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: oldfart on August 04, 2007, 10:44:54 PM
I wonder if LaLa's is going to be trying to take names in the Chat room too. :smt107

If so I have this funny feeling she will come back here in a Nasty Mood ... just wanting to :2brickwall:

why is it bad in there?

NOT BAD  Mrs... Just Busy.... Busy...Busy...


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Mere on August 04, 2007, 10:48:49 PM
Nite folks....see you in the morning... :smt039


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 04, 2007, 10:49:28 PM
Nite folks....see you in the morning... :smt039

nite Mere...


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 04, 2007, 10:50:23 PM
Is it me or are they over doing the bridge story?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: MuffyBee on August 04, 2007, 10:52:10 PM
Is it me or are they over doing the bridge story?

The bridge story is important but it is being run into the ground.  They are re-running the reruns they already ran.  And are interviewing anything and anyone that was within miles of the bridge.  Updates would be nice.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Sue on August 04, 2007, 10:53:23 PM


HI Is there a chat room now and If so where is it :)


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 04, 2007, 10:53:54 PM
Is it me or are they over doing the bridge story?

The bridge story is important but it is being run into the ground.  They are re-running the reruns they already ran.  And are interviewing anything and anyone that was within miles of the bridge.  Updates would be nice.

I thought it was just me...


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: oldfart on August 04, 2007, 10:54:16 PM
I was trying to find out how to post this some place... (a PDF) but it too big for an attachement

It is a PDF from  the Aruba Chamber of Commerce  May/June 2001.
http://www.arubachamber.com/newsletters/mayjun01.pdf

Some of the "Problems going on" and I think something about what I would call a
"Freedom on Information" act/law...

Not sure if we could use the info someway  ... but they still have the same problems



Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: San on August 04, 2007, 10:54:27 PM
Nite folks....see you in the morning... :smt039

Nite Mere.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 04, 2007, 10:54:31 PM


HI Is there a chat room now and If so where is it :)

go to the top of the page... you can sign in there...


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: San on August 04, 2007, 10:56:17 PM


HI Is there a chat room now and If so where is it :)

Hi Sue, it's at the top of the page in the row that says HOME, HELP, SEARCH, PROFILE, ETC.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: oldfart on August 04, 2007, 10:56:47 PM


HI Is there a chat room now and If so where is it :)

Sue
Top of the page next to the Profile / Log in - out buttons


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 04, 2007, 10:57:28 PM
Since everyone is in chat anyway... I am going to go on a rant...

I cannot believe that stupid Geraldo's show spent so much time on a crappy ass porn site.... mr. skin...

and we wonder why there is a rise in sexual predators??? and the studios are paying this assbite???? 

and what's even funnier is, I would have thought when I was younger that it wasn't a big deal.... now I see what the older people (than me) meant...


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Destiny on August 04, 2007, 10:57:28 PM
Sorry my good Friends...I must log off now...I work/am part of a womens spousal abuse support group. Has been taking a lot of my time in the past week...can't believe what humans can do to humans.

Will check back in soon....I'm part of the underground network...takes time when we are dealing with W and children involved...love you all for what you do.

C-Ya soon...need prayers for our group.

Thanks....Destiny


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: oldfart on August 04, 2007, 10:57:41 PM
Sorry ...
I need to look before I post .. :2doh:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 04, 2007, 10:58:24 PM
Sorry my good Friends...I must log off now...I work/am part of a womens spousal abuse support group. Has been taking a lot of my time in the past week...can't believe what humans can do to humans.

Will check back in soon....I'm part of the underground network...takes time when we are dealing with W and children involved...love you all for what you do.

C-Ya soon...need prayers for our group.

Thanks....Destiny

bye destiny... prayers said.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: oldfart on August 04, 2007, 10:59:23 PM
Sorry my good Friends...I must log off now...I work/am part of a womens spousal abuse support group. Has been taking a lot of my time in the past week...can't believe what humans can do to humans.

Will check back in soon....I'm part of the underground network...takes time when we are dealing with W and children involved...love you all for what you do.

C-Ya soon...need prayers for our group.

Thanks....Destiny

Destiny

Bless you for the work that you are doing...  Please try to Pop in now and again

OldF


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Kat_Gram on August 04, 2007, 11:01:31 PM
I was in the Chat room. It is Kool. Makes noises. :shock:
Le Chats here thought it had something to do with them.
So, they are here. One is on my lap, looking for attention.
Goodnight all from Kat and her two trusty chats, Luscious Fatty and Baby Peaks.  :smt052 :smt052Their last names are Cutie-Pie-Pie.
Same as mine. :)      


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: San on August 04, 2007, 11:02:08 PM
Sorry my good Friends...I must log off now...I work/am part of a womens spousal abuse support group. Has been taking a lot of my time in the past week...can't believe what humans can do to humans.

Will check back in soon....I'm part of the underground network...takes time when we are dealing with W and children involved...love you all for what you do.

C-Ya soon...need prayers for our group.

Thanks....Destiny
You and your group will be in my prayers Destiny.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: oldfart on August 04, 2007, 11:03:33 PM
I was in the Chat room. It is Kool. Makes noises. :shock:
Le Chats here thought it had something to do with them.
So, they are here. One is on my lap, looking for attention.
Goodnight all from Kat and her two trusty chats, Luscious Fatty and Baby Peaks.  :smt052 :smt052Their last names are Cutie-Pie-Pie.
Same as mine. :)      

KAT  You lost your Avi ..... in the Chat I'm betting


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 04, 2007, 11:07:37 PM
Nite Kat...


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Destiny on August 04, 2007, 11:07:45 PM
Sorry my good Friends...I must log off now...I work/am part of a womens spousal abuse support group. Has been taking a lot of my time in the past week...can't believe what humans can do to humans.

Will check back in soon....I'm part of the underground network...takes time when we are dealing with W and children involved...love you all for what you do.

C-Ya soon...need prayers for our group.

Thanks....Destiny

Destiny

Bless you for the work that you are doing...  Please try to Pop in now and again

OldF

OLDF...I'll more than pop in Dear...just right now have been dealing with a Woman and her 5 kids...we've been sending them all over the US to *protect her and children* from a MONSTER.

This is one of my primary goals. We set up paypal accounts, get them prepaid phones, and provide them with places to stay/w/kids to help them get out of dangerous situations...


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on August 04, 2007, 11:08:12 PM
OK - I'm officially out of the chat room for a while.  Too many areas to watch.  They are on their own, lol  :lol:

I wish I had a nice glass of wine to offer you... to make the world stop spinning  :lol:

I'm trying to catch up again, going backwards, but when I went in there, all I was able to do was say hi to MuffyBee and then the screen when weird, and a box popped up that something was downloading...everything was a mess.  I closed out and went back in but same thing happened....not sure I will venture back.

Oldfart,

Maybe I'll put a brief summary of the wedding in the Lounge...it was discussed here earlier this week, in bits and pieces....


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 04, 2007, 11:08:39 PM
anybody know what story a colorado flyfishing site would be into here? 


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 04, 2007, 11:11:21 PM
OK - I'm officially out of the chat room for a while.  Too many areas to watch.  They are on their own, lol  :lol:

I wish I had a nice glass of wine to offer you... to make the world stop spinning  :lol:

I'm trying to catch up again, going backwards, but when I went in there, all I was able to do was say hi to MuffyBee and then the screen when weird, and a box popped up that something was downloading...everything was a mess.  I closed out and went back in but same thing happened....not sure I will venture back.

Oldfart,

Maybe I'll put a brief summary of the wedding in the Lounge...it was discussed here earlier this week, in bits and pieces....

Same thing happens to me... makes me so mad I want to throw my computer out the window...


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Destiny on August 04, 2007, 11:12:51 PM
Sorry my good Friends...I must log off now...I work/am part of a womens spousal abuse support group. Has been taking a lot of my time in the past week...can't believe what humans can do to humans.

Will check back in soon....I'm part of the underground network...takes time when we are dealing with W and children involved...love you all for what you do.

C-Ya soon...need prayers for our group.

Thanks....Destiny
You and your group will be in my prayers Destiny.

Bless YOU San for what you do here.

Dest


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: oldfart on August 04, 2007, 11:13:24 PM
Destiny
I posted an e-mail a page or two back...
If you have one that you can use and feel safe about it  I would like to talk to you a bit..

See If I can get my daughter  and you talking...
I think her work and yours may have some common ground

Thanks ... and like I said... only if YOU feel safe in doing it...
OldF


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 04, 2007, 11:13:37 PM
anybody know what story a colorado flyfishing site would be into here? 

are they betting on how long I can talk to myself?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on August 04, 2007, 11:14:28 PM

I'm trying to catch up again, going backwards, but when I went in there, all I was able to do was say hi to MuffyBee and then the screen when weird, and a box popped up that something was downloading...everything was a mess.  I closed out and went back in but same thing happened....not sure I will venture back.

Oldfart,

Maybe I'll put a brief summary of the wedding in the Lounge...it was discussed here earlier this week, in bits and pieces....

Same thing happens to me... makes me so mad I want to throw my computer out the window...

Glad I'm not alone...it was awful....the chat screen was all distorted and that downloading file thing just made me nervous.  Never had that happen with the old one...Dugga may know why.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Destiny on August 04, 2007, 11:14:56 PM
Destiny
I posted an e-mail a page or two back...
If you have one that you can use and feel safe about it  I would like to talk to you a bit..

See If I can get my daughter  and you talking...
I think her work and yours may have some common ground

Thanks ... and like I said... only if YOU feel safe in doing it...
OldF

OLDF...I would like that....TY

Dest


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: sb on August 04, 2007, 11:16:42 PM
BTW if you have tabbed browsing, you can tab back and forth between the Lively and the chat room. Bring lotsa memory, though.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 04, 2007, 11:17:14 PM
Destiny, that is huge... a huge thing to do. so many people don't understand how women can be beaten down mentally to feel that the only thing they can do or are worth is staying...


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 04, 2007, 11:18:47 PM
BTW if you have tabbed browsing, you can tab back and forth between the Lively and the chat room. Bring lotsa memory, though.

thanks SB...


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on August 04, 2007, 11:19:20 PM
BTW if you have tabbed browsing, you can tab back and forth between the Lively and the chat room. Bring lotsa memory, though.

Not using tabbed browsing but this computer is memory challenged...want to replace but don't want Vista...


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on August 04, 2007, 11:21:32 PM
Did someone resize my avatar....seems my throne is not as wide as it was a day or so ago?  Noticed earlier...


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on August 04, 2007, 11:21:58 PM
anybody know what story a colorado flyfishing site would be into here? 

are they betting on how long I can talk to myself?

LOL.  If knew the answer I would have said something to ya.  I just don't know.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on August 04, 2007, 11:23:39 PM
anybody know what story a colorado flyfishing site would be into here? 

are they betting on how long I can talk to myself?

LOL.  If knew the answer I would have said something to ya.  I just don't know.

Me, too, but I was in the same boat...talking to myself... :lol:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: sleddogs on August 04, 2007, 11:23:56 PM
OT

Explosives Found Near Goose Creek; FBI on Scene
(near Charleton, SC)

Goose Creek - Berkeley County police pulled over a vehicle in a routine traffic stop near Meyers Road and Highway 1-76 around 6 p.m.  The vehicle with Florida tags was driven by two men of Middle Eastern descent.  Inside police found explosive devices.  Highway 1-76 near Goose Creek has since been shut down.

http://www.abcnews4.com/news/stories/0807/444994.html


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Destiny on August 04, 2007, 11:25:15 PM
Destiny
I posted an e-mail a page or two back...
If you have one that you can use and feel safe about it  I would like to talk to you a bit..

See If I can get my daughter  and you talking...
I think her work and yours may have some common ground

Thanks ... and like I said... only if YOU feel safe in doing it...
OldF

OLDF...I would like that....TY

Dest

Ask the Klass for my email addy...will be glad to answer any questions.
Dest


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 04, 2007, 11:26:20 PM
OT

Explosives Found Near Goose Creek; FBI on Scene
(near Charleton, SC)

Goose Creek - Berkeley County police pulled over a vehicle in a routine traffic stop near Meyers Road and Highway 1-76 around 6 p.m.  The vehicle with Florida tags was driven by two men of Middle Eastern descent.  Inside police found explosive devices.  Highway 1-76 near Goose Creek has since been shut down.

http://www.abcnews4.com/news/stories/0807/444994.html

WOW... that is scary... thanks for the heads up!


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: oldfart on August 04, 2007, 11:28:22 PM
Did someone resize my avatar....seems my throne is not as wide as it was a day or so ago?  Noticed earlier...

someone is working overtime...
the scroll  <---> under some Avi's (that I saw are gone)


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Marlee on August 04, 2007, 11:28:47 PM
I am really trying to get the scan of Tim on here.  I am having a very hard time loading SM.  Can I email it to you Mrs Red or Klass? Then you can post it.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: San on August 04, 2007, 11:29:00 PM
Did someone resize my avatar....seems my throne is not as wide as it was a day or so ago?  Noticed earlier...

Yours does look a little smaller.  I don't know if it had anything to do with what Dugga was tinkering with.  Klaas will know better.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 04, 2007, 11:29:37 PM
Did someone resize my avatar....seems my throne is not as wide as it was a day or so ago?  Noticed earlier...

someone is working overtime...
the scroll  <---> under some Avi's (that I saw are gone)

dugga working on esthetics...

truth and NJ.. .thanks for the reply... that just got my curiosity up... flyfishing??


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on August 04, 2007, 11:30:23 PM
OT

Explosives Found Near Goose Creek; FBI on Scene
(near Charleton, SC)

Goose Creek - Berkeley County police pulled over a vehicle in a routine traffic stop near Meyers Road and Highway 1-76 around 6 p.m.  The vehicle with Florida tags was driven by two men of Middle Eastern descent.  Inside police found explosive devices.  Highway 1-76 near Goose Creek has since been shut down.

http://www.abcnews4.com/news/stories/0807/444994.html

The police will probably be accused of racially profiling.  Don't worry about the explosive devices.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 04, 2007, 11:31:10 PM
I am really trying to get the scan of Tim on here.  I am having a very hard time loading SM.  Can I email it to you Mrs Red or Klass? Then you can post it.

fine with me... I will email to San or Klaas to post... I don't know how... :oops:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 04, 2007, 11:32:41 PM
OT

Explosives Found Near Goose Creek; FBI on Scene
(near Charleton, SC)

Goose Creek - Berkeley County police pulled over a vehicle in a routine traffic stop near Meyers Road and Highway 1-76 around 6 p.m.  The vehicle with Florida tags was driven by two men of Middle Eastern descent.  Inside police found explosive devices.  Highway 1-76 near Goose Creek has since been shut down.

http://www.abcnews4.com/news/stories/0807/444994.html

The police will probably be accused of racially profiling.  Don't worry about the explosive devices.
[/color]

so sad and so true.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on August 04, 2007, 11:33:01 PM
I have to call it a night.  After church tomorrow I get to strip floors.  WooHoo!!  And we have a LOT of hardwood.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 04, 2007, 11:33:42 PM
I have to call it a night.  After church tomorrow I get to strip floors.  WooHoo!!  And we have a LOT of hardwood.

Nite truth.... and I am jealous... hardwoods rock!


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on August 04, 2007, 11:35:21 PM
Did someone resize my avatar....seems my throne is not as wide as it was a day or so ago?  Noticed earlier...

someone is working overtime...
the scroll  <---> under some Avi's (that I saw are gone)

Very observant of you, Mr. Oldfart... :wink:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on August 04, 2007, 11:36:25 PM
I have to call it a night.  After church tomorrow I get to strip floors.  WooHoo!!  And we have a LOT of hardwood.

Nite truth.... and I am jealous... hardwoods rock!

These were not supposed to be waxed, but SOMEBODY, who thought they were doing a good deed, put wax on them.  We had to keep waxing for a while, but now it's out of control.  We have to strip it all off.  Wish me luck.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: oldfart on August 04, 2007, 11:38:00 PM
Thanks SeldDogs

Destiny
Will do... but I will also check with the daughter 1st .
Sorry ... I kinda got the cart in front of the horse for a bit..  :2doh:     



Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 04, 2007, 11:38:23 PM
I have to call it a night.  After church tomorrow I get to strip floors.  WooHoo!!  And we have a LOT of hardwood.

Nite truth.... and I am jealous... hardwoods rock!

These were not supposed to be waxed, but SOMEBODY, who thought they were doing a good deed, put wax on them.  We had to keep waxing for a while, but now it's out of control.  We have to strip it all off.  Wish me luck.

I do wish you luck on that one... but hardwood floors are so gorgeous!


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on August 04, 2007, 11:38:29 PM
Good Luck, Truthseeker2....


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on August 04, 2007, 11:39:37 PM
Hey, I just got that white page Easywriter mentioned....hung there after I submitted my post....(not long, though)


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 04, 2007, 11:40:24 PM
I am really trying to get the scan of Tim on here.  I am having a very hard time loading SM.  Can I email it to you Mrs Red or Klass? Then you can post it.

Marlee - you can email it to me and I'll post it for you. 


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: sb on August 04, 2007, 11:45:19 PM
OT

Explosives Found Near Goose Creek; FBI on Scene
(near Charleton, SC)

Goose Creek - Berkeley County police pulled over a vehicle in a routine traffic stop near Meyers Road and Highway 1-76 around 6 p.m.  The vehicle with Florida tags was driven by two men of Middle Eastern descent.  Inside police found explosive devices.  Highway 1-76 near Goose Creek has since been shut down.

http://www.abcnews4.com/news/stories/0807/444994.html

The I-95 Corridor along the East Coast is a VERY dangerous conduit for drugs, contraband, you name it, from Florida to the NE and vice versa. There should be a LOT of police patrolling that highway and all cities along that route. Charleston isn't TECHNICALLY on that route but it only about 30 miles from it.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Marlee on August 04, 2007, 11:47:01 PM
i think i did...i don't know nothin no more...the white page....i have just seen it many times


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 04, 2007, 11:50:04 PM
i think i did...i don't know nothin no more...the white page....i have just seen it many times

that's one I don't get... I think I saw that once... but we should probably tell dugga...


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 04, 2007, 11:51:56 PM
I am really trying to get the scan of Tim on here.  I am having a very hard time loading SM.  Can I email it to you Mrs Red or Klass? Then you can post it.

Marlee - you can email it to me and I'll post it for you. 

Here is the scan Marlee sent of the People Magazine article with Tim Miller.  It's a bit hard to read:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub2/TimMIller-PeopleMag-3.jpg)


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 04, 2007, 11:54:39 PM
thanks Klaas and Marlee....

i wish they would do a bigger spread on him ...


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Marlee on August 04, 2007, 11:56:23 PM
i think i did...i don't know nothin no more...the white page....i have just seen it many times

that's one I don't get... I think I saw that once... but we should probably tell dugga...

I have never had this many problems.  I have re-booted twice, am not using AOL, cleared cookies and cache.  Here is my page speed fom the bottom.......Page created in 0.097 seconds with 23 queries. Didn't Dugga say if it got to 1.00 to tell him?  If so it's almost there.
   
Klaas: Did you get the email?






Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 04, 2007, 11:58:16 PM
i think i did...i don't know nothin no more...the white page....i have just seen it many times

that's one I don't get... I think I saw that once... but we should probably tell dugga...

I have never had this many problems.  I have re-booted twice, am not using AOL, cleared cookies and cache.  Here is my page speed fom the bottom.......Page created in 0.097 seconds with 23 queries. Didn't Dugga say if it got to 1.00 to tell him?  If so it's almost there.
   
Klaas: Did you get the email?






Yes, I posted it already, LOL  :lol:  Actually Dugga said if it gets to 5 to let him know.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: sb on August 05, 2007, 12:00:05 AM
Pages are loading MUCH faster than before, and Tribalfusion isn't causing the hangs like it used to.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: MuffyBee on August 05, 2007, 12:02:10 AM
But, but, but...the page created thingy showed a very low number at the bottom for me a couple of days ago, and the pages still didn't load.  I would walk away and come back and it would still be sitting there.  So the number down at the bottom wasn't a true reflection of what was really going on for me.  Does that make sense?  It just finally got better one time.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on August 05, 2007, 12:02:14 AM
i think i did...i don't know nothin no more...the white page....i have just seen it many times

that's one I don't get... I think I saw that once... but we should probably tell dugga...

I have never had this many problems.  I have re-booted twice, am not using AOL, cleared cookies and cache.  Here is my page speed fom the bottom.......Page created in 0.097 seconds with 23 queries. Didn't Dugga say if it got to 1.00 to tell him?  If so it's almost there.
   
Klaas: Did you get the email?






Marlee I think to get to nearly 1.00 it would have to be showing 0.970 rather than 0.097?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Marlee on August 05, 2007, 12:02:17 AM
I will do that article on Tim again tomorrow.  There is something wrong with my computer tonight I think.

Very sad that his wife said that his credit is ruined because he has put so much money into TE. Around $100,000.  I really hope that this article generates some funds for him. 

What can we as Monkeys do? Do you think an auction of some kind would work?  Everyone can donate something and we could auction it off.  I would help if enough want to do it


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on August 05, 2007, 12:05:11 AM
But, but, but...the page created thingy showed a very low number at the bottom for me a couple of days ago, and the pages still didn't load.  I would walk away and come back and it would still be sitting there.  So the number down at the bottom wasn't a true reflection of what was really going on for me.  Does that make sense?  It just finally got better one time.

Muffy I was having lots of problems with slow loading pages or getting "Server not found" messages when posting or refreshing (it is safe to refresh here  :lol:) but then Dugga reconfigured something and it has been good ever since.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Marlee on August 05, 2007, 12:06:06 AM
i think i did...i don't know nothin no more...the white page....i have just seen it many times

that's one I don't get... I think I saw that once... but we should probably tell dugga...

I have never had this many problems.  I have re-booted twice, am not using AOL, cleared cookies and cache.  Here is my page speed fom the bottom.......Page created in 0.097 seconds with 23 queries. Didn't Dugga say if it got to 1.00 to tell him?  If so it's almost there.
   
Klaas: Did you get the email?






Marlee I think to get to nearly 1.00 it would have to be showing 0.970 rather than 0.097?


YES Tibro, you are right....lol...I can't see straight right now....I am done posting tonight.  Maybe when my computer sleeps tonight it will be better tomorrow.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: MuffyBee on August 05, 2007, 12:08:32 AM
But, but, but...the page created thingy showed a very low number at the bottom for me a couple of days ago, and the pages still didn't load.  I would walk away and come back and it would still be sitting there.  So the number down at the bottom wasn't a true reflection of what was really going on for me.  Does that make sense?  It just finally got better one time.

Muffy I was having lots of problems with slow loading pages or getting "Server not found" messages when posting or refreshing (it is safe to refresh here  :lol:) but then Dugga reconfigured something and it has been good ever since.
I had emailed Dugga and he replied to me, but it got better somehow.  I hope we don't wear Dugga out.  Do you think he comes with a warranty?  Really though-I appreciate all he's trying to do with the new forum and all.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 05, 2007, 12:14:15 AM
SB... you are right that corridor is a hot bed... and the coast of Maine is the largest coast in the US I think... lots of ways to get in and out unseen, or so I have been told...


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 05, 2007, 12:14:51 AM
OK.. I just got that hanging white page...


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: oldfart on August 05, 2007, 12:18:58 AM
But, but, but...the page created thingy showed a very low number at the bottom for me a couple of days ago, and the pages still didn't load.  I would walk away and come back and it would still be sitting there.  So the number down at the bottom wasn't a true reflection of what was really going on for me.  Does that make sense?  It just finally got better one time.

Muffy I was having lots of problems with slow loading pages or getting "Server not found" messages when posting or refreshing (it is safe to refresh here  :lol:) but then Dugga reconfigured something and it has been good ever since.
I had emailed Dugga and he replied to me, but it got better somehow.  I hope we don't wear Dugga out.  Do you think he comes with a warranty?  Really though-I appreciate all he's trying to do with the new forum and all.

MuffyBee   :lol: :lol:
I wonder if Mrs. Dugga has taken out the extra coverage :wink:
AND
What type of "Extended Warranty Plan " should we all go in on and take out for Klaasend. :lol:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: sb on August 05, 2007, 12:24:54 AM
I think even the chat folks are tired tonight and are signing off. I'll do the same... see y'all tomorrow sometime!


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 05, 2007, 12:32:14 AM
Nite SB

Oldfart - too funny :lol:

Oldfart by the way, I emailed that Arubachamber 2001 pdf to Red.  It was an interresting read.   :wink:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 05, 2007, 12:35:53 AM
Nite y'all... i think everyone wore themselves out... on chat...

keep the faith!


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: oldfart on August 05, 2007, 12:39:07 AM
Nite SB

Oldfart - too funny :lol:

Oldfart by the way, I emailed that Arubachamber 2001 pdf to Red.  It was an interresting read.   :wink:

Thanks Klaasend
I just wish we could find some way to get some info out them...

? do you have any specifics you want placed in your warranty ?  (http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c314/OldF/hmm.gif)

G'nite 
Think I will play some where else for a bit

Seeee Yaa Byeee


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 05, 2007, 12:39:49 AM
Nite Oldfart


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: LilPuma on August 05, 2007, 07:33:23 AM
Morning Minkeys! 

This might already be old news since I didn't watch the news last night, but when I turned it on this morning the Duane Chapman was being interviewed and he's been cleared by a Mexican court.  He's a free man. 


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: sharon on August 05, 2007, 08:21:17 AM
Sorry my good Friends...I must log off now...I work/am part of a womens spousal abuse support group. Has been taking a lot of my time in the past week...can't believe what humans can do to humans.

Will check back in soon....I'm part of the underground network...takes time when we are dealing with W and children involved...love you all for what you do.

C-Ya soon...need prayers for our group.

Thanks....Destiny

Destiny -- prayers for your group. And for you for what you are doing to help.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: LilPuma on August 05, 2007, 08:24:58 AM
Morning Minkeys! 

This might already be old news since I didn't watch the news last night, but when I turned it on this morning the Duane Chapman was being interviewed and he's been cleared by a Mexican court.  He's a free man. 

I finally got to the front page and see this is old news.  But I'm sure glad to hear this got settled and on the side of justice. 


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Easywriter on August 05, 2007, 09:04:10 AM
Anything new happening?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: GreatOwl on August 05, 2007, 09:31:30 AM
Morning Minkeys! 

This might already be old news since I didn't watch the news last night, but when I turned it on this morning the Duane Chapman was being interviewed and he's been cleared by a Mexican court.  He's a free man. 

I finally got to the front page and see this is old news.  But I'm sure glad to hear this got settled and on the side of justice. 

There has been some reservations about this from some sources.  He was not cleared.  According to reports the court document was written in Spanish and dealt with the expiration of the "Statute of Limitations."  According to first reports it does seem that charges will be dropped on that basis.  However, there is a caution right now until they can get someone with a legal knowledge of the interpretation of the legal documents from Spanish to English.  It will probably mean that it has been dismissed because of the expiration of time, but they really wish to be sure.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: oldfart on August 05, 2007, 10:04:41 AM
Morning Monkeys  ...... Yawnnnn Stetch ....

 :)


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Easywriter on August 05, 2007, 10:08:45 AM
Mornin' OF!  Been kind of a lazy, hazy Sunday morning for me.  Two quick thunder showers already, but the sun is turning it into steam now.  :-?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: oldfart on August 05, 2007, 10:15:51 AM
Mornin' OF!  Been kind of a lazy, hazy Sunday morning for me.  Two quick thunder showers already, but the sun is turning it into steam now.  :-?

Are you saying it Might get a bit Humid  there today  :lol:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Marlee on August 05, 2007, 10:18:22 AM
Here is a clearer picture of the article about Tim Miller that is in People Magazine.




(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v490/marlee4000/TimMIller-PeopleMag.jpg)


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Easywriter on August 05, 2007, 10:20:29 AM
Mornin' OF!  Been kind of a lazy, hazy Sunday morning for me.  Two quick thunder showers already, but the sun is turning it into steam now.  :-?

Are you saying it Might get a bit Humid  there today  :lol:

Yep, hot as blazes and twice as humid.  I'm going to hide out in the AC all day. lol


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: oldfart on August 05, 2007, 10:21:54 AM
Thakns  Marlee


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Marlee on August 05, 2007, 10:26:34 AM
Good Morning Old Fart and Easy!
 


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Easywriter on August 05, 2007, 10:27:53 AM
That's a nice article about Tim Miller.  It's a shame it puts such a financial strain on him.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Destiny on August 05, 2007, 10:29:16 AM
Morning Monkeys  ...... Yawnnnn Stetch ....

 :)

Morning OLDF    Ya know, I was thinking that if you went into your profile settings and just changed OLD FART to OLDF, it would auto-quote that to all your posts, and Folks would have an easier time training themselves to use that name.

Would make it a lot less trouble searching for your posts....just a thought, don't throw banana peels at me.

Destiny....Morning all you fine fine Monkeys!


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: oldfart on August 05, 2007, 10:37:26 AM
Morning Monkeys  ...... Yawnnnn Stetch ....

 :)

Morning OLDF    Ya know, I was thinking that if you went into your profile settings and just changed OLD FART to OLDF, it would auto-quote that to all your posts, and Folks would have an easier time training themselves to use that name.

Would make it a lot less trouble searching for your posts....just a thought, don't throw banana peels at me.

Destiny....Morning all you fine fine Monkeys!

Destiny
G' Morning...
I do not think we can change Tag/Nic names like that


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: BTgirl on August 05, 2007, 10:52:20 AM
Morning monkeys.

Here's something appropriate for a Sunday morning. Please look and listen if you have time - it's purty!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MHIfRLNYUGw&mode=related&search=


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on August 05, 2007, 11:01:24 AM
Amen, BTgirl. 

Good morning, everyone.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Destiny on August 05, 2007, 11:02:39 AM
Morning Monkeys  ...... Yawnnnn Stetch ....

 :)

Morning OLDF    Ya know, I was thinking that if you went into your profile settings and just changed OLD FART to OLDF, it would auto-quote that to all your posts, and Folks would have an easier time training themselves to use that name.

Would make it a lot less trouble searching for your posts....just a thought, don't throw banana peels at me.

Destiny....Morning all you fine fine Monkeys!

Destiny
G' Morning...
I do not think we can change Tag/Nic names like that

OLDF....well dang...I just didn't know that ;-)

FWIW.....I honestly DO NOT think that Lorenzo is still in jail for some pot plants...hell, tourists in Aruba are accosted on every street corner by drug peddlers...crack houses everywhere.

Now all of a sudden Lorenzo is the focus for OMG 100 pot plants...nope not buying it at all.

I think that Lorenzo is being held for other reasons.

1  maybe for his own protection.
2  maybe to keep him from blabbing something higher ups don't want him to blab.
3  All of the above.

Someone give me the phone # to the Aruba ALE/jail...I wanna call them myself and ask them what is going on!  Klass...you have the #

Destiny


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: BTgirl on August 05, 2007, 11:13:11 AM
Amen, BTgirl. 

Good morning, everyone.

Morning 2NJ.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Destiny on August 05, 2007, 11:18:10 AM
Morning monkeys.

Here's something appropriate for a Sunday morning. Please look and listen if you have time - it's purty!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MHIfRLNYUGw&mode=related&search=

Morning BT!

That set my tone for the day...THANK YOU!!!

Dest


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: oldfart on August 05, 2007, 11:18:26 AM
Destiny

You will find a list of phone #'s here....Good Luck  :D

http://www.kparuba.com/contacts.html


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Destiny on August 05, 2007, 11:21:53 AM
Destiny

You will find a list of phone #'s here....Good Luck  :D

http://www.kparuba.com/contacts.html

Thank You Kind Sir :2notworthy:

Dest


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: BTgirl on August 05, 2007, 11:22:22 AM
Morning monkeys.

Here's something appropriate for a Sunday morning. Please look and listen if you have time - it's purty!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MHIfRLNYUGw&mode=related&search=

Morning BT!

That set my tone for the day...THANK YOU!!!

Dest

Hey Destiny - It makes you appreciate things, doesn't it?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: oldfart on August 05, 2007, 11:24:54 AM
O/T

BT.. You still here ?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: oldfart on August 05, 2007, 11:26:58 AM
Never mind... it was super O/T and I gott run....


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: NYC_lover on August 05, 2007, 11:27:14 AM
Good morning all,

I see, sad news about Mr. Miller
Can we something to for him?

Does there have any personaly contact with him?
And can him a time invisted in a chatbox, that somebody can to present to him, about financial business,
that can help him, out this financial problems.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Auntiem on August 05, 2007, 11:32:21 AM
Can somebody help me I can't get into chat room!!! :-?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: NYC_lover on August 05, 2007, 11:34:04 AM
Can somebody help me I can't get into chat room!!! :-?

What is the problem?
Try your computer new again. Sometimes can that helping, when not let me know!


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: NYC_lover on August 05, 2007, 11:35:40 AM
Can somebody help me I can't get into chat room!!! :-?

What is the problem?
Try start your computer new up. Sometimes can that help, when not let me know!


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on August 05, 2007, 11:36:41 AM
Good morning all,

I see, sad news about Mr. Miller
Can we something to for him?

Does there have any personaly contact with him?
And can him a time invisted in a chatbox, that somebody can to present to him, about financial business,
that can help him, out this financial problems.

Here is the website for TES...there is a link for Make Donation:

http://www.texasequusearch.org/

Not sure if Tim Miller has time to come to chat, but I cannot speak for him. 


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on August 05, 2007, 11:39:21 AM
Can somebody help me I can't get into chat room!!! :-?

I have tried a few times to go into the chat room, and have had problems.  I do not think we are the only ones. 

When I go in, a box pops up that a file is being downloaded, then the whole chat forum goes crazy....distorts & freezes up.  I have not tried today, but yesterday, I was able to say hello to MuffyBee and that was it...could not post in there afterward.



Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on August 05, 2007, 11:39:40 AM
What happened to Tim?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on August 05, 2007, 11:42:02 AM
What happened to Tim?

Hi, BB.  Marlee posted an article from People magazine....Tim's wife mentions how he's put his finances in jeopardy to keep TES going.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on August 05, 2007, 11:46:07 AM
What happened to Tim?

Hi, BB.  Marlee posted an article from People magazine....Tim's wife mentions how he's put his finances in jeopardy to keep TES going.

Thanks for the update 2NJ.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on August 05, 2007, 11:51:07 AM
You're welcome, BB...the article is on the previous page (17)....

BBL...must get some things done.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Destiny on August 05, 2007, 11:51:22 AM
Good morning all,

I see, sad news about Mr. Miller
Can we something to for him?

Does there have any personaly contact with him?
And can him a time invisted in a chatbox, that somebody can to present to him, about financial business,
that can help him, out this financial problems.

Goodmorning NYC_lover!

I think that is a great idea!

Destiny


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Auntiem on August 05, 2007, 11:56:41 AM
 I'm still stuck in the dark! in chat  can't get all the way in....


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 05, 2007, 11:58:26 AM
I'm still stuck in the dark! in chat  can't get all the way in....

I'll let Dugga know people are having problems with chat when I see him logged in.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Destiny on August 05, 2007, 12:02:37 PM
I know this sounds stoooopid of me...but, does anyone know what time of the day/night it is in Aruba right now?

Thanks in advance....Destiny


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 05, 2007, 12:08:03 PM
I know this sounds stoooopid of me...but, does anyone know what time of the day/night it is in Aruba right now?

Thanks in advance....Destiny

I believe Aruba is the same as our Eastern time.  So it's approx noon in Aruba right now.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Destiny on August 05, 2007, 12:13:28 PM
I know this sounds stoooopid of me...but, does anyone know what time of the day/night it is in Aruba right now?

Thanks in advance....Destiny

I believe Aruba is the same as our Eastern time.  So it's approx noon in Aruba right now.

Thanks Klaas...got some phone calls to make ;-)
Dest


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: SunFreak2 on August 05, 2007, 12:20:08 PM
I've been thinking alot lately about the blood in the car turning into chocolate & cleaning fluid discussion we;ve been having.

I don't ever recall any comments from Deepak, Joran or Satish about the car being cut up for samples.  I don't know about the average person, but I would be mightily po'd if my car were cut up.  It would mean expenses to replace the head liner and backseat cover.  I would be indignant especially if I kept my car immaculate like Deepak claims he did. I'd also be very angry if I were an innocent person this happened too.

We know Deepak talked.  He talked to John or Jones I forget about the family hatching the plan around the poool.  He talked to SKeeter.  Why no commments about the car?  Doesn't seem right to me.  Maybe b/c he knew it was a different car and not his?



Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 05, 2007, 12:36:28 PM
I've been thinking alot lately about the blood in the car turning into chocolate & cleaning fluid discussion we;ve been having.

I don't ever recall any comments from Deepak, Joran or Satish about the car being cut up for samples.  I don't know about the average person, but I would be mightily po'd if my car were cut up.  It would mean expenses to replace the head liner and backseat cover.  I would be indignant especially if I kept my car immaculate like Deepak claims he did. I'd also be very angry if I were an innocent person this happened too.

We know Deepak talked.  He talked to John or Jones I forget about the family hatching the plan around the poool.  He talked to SKeeter.  Why no commments about the car?  Doesn't seem right to me.  Maybe b/c he knew it was a different car and not his?



FWIW - and you can take with a grain of salt, but I've been told by someone who claims to know Deepak that his car was torn apart.  That's not to say there wasn't a 2nd car.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on August 05, 2007, 12:45:43 PM
I've been thinking alot lately about the blood in the car turning into chocolate & cleaning fluid discussion we;ve been having.

I don't ever recall any comments from Deepak, Joran or Satish about the car being cut up for samples.  I don't know about the average person, but I would be mightily po'd if my car were cut up.  It would mean expenses to replace the head liner and backseat cover.  I would be indignant especially if I kept my car immaculate like Deepak claims he did. I'd also be very angry if I were an innocent person this happened too.

We know Deepak talked.  He talked to John or Jones I forget about the family hatching the plan around the poool.  He talked to SKeeter.  Why no commments about the car?  Doesn't seem right to me.  Maybe b/c he knew it was a different car and not his?



FWIW - and you can take with a grain of salt, but I've been told by someone who claims to know Deepak that his car was torn apart.  That's not to say there wasn't a 2nd car.

I had been thinking about Sunfreak's post, and thought that it was reasonable based on what most of us know.  Now, reading your post, it shows that some are in contact with people who may or may not have more information based on friendships or contact with the case.   

Will we ever know for sure?  I, personally, do not know.

Made me think of that car PVDS was driving with the chunk out of the steering wheel...silly as it may seem.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: San on August 05, 2007, 12:53:18 PM
I've been thinking alot lately about the blood in the car turning into chocolate & cleaning fluid discussion we;ve been having.

I don't ever recall any comments from Deepak, Joran or Satish about the car being cut up for samples.  I don't know about the average person, but I would be mightily po'd if my car were cut up.  It would mean expenses to replace the head liner and backseat cover.  I would be indignant especially if I kept my car immaculate like Deepak claims he did. I'd also be very angry if I were an innocent person this happened too.

We know Deepak talked.  He talked to John or Jones I forget about the family hatching the plan around the poool.  He talked to SKeeter.  Why no commments about the car?  Doesn't seem right to me.  Maybe b/c he knew it was a different car and not his?



He is not going to comment about the car if there is blood in it because it makes him look even more guilty.  He had that interior replaced.  He had 10 days to replace everything.  The ALE could have said his car was torn apart when actually they were taking the new interior he put in the car and using it as part of the evidence they were sending to the forensic institute in Holland and saying this is part of his car.  Of course there would be no evidence on it because they knew it was all newly replaced.  It is impossible that there was no trace of Natalee in that car.  JMO.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Auntiem on August 05, 2007, 01:01:02 PM
  Well I figured out what is wrong with my chat, I can get in but I did sometning in my Options to my backgrounds and its all black and I can't see it to fix it.  LOL  I can see what everyone is saying but I can't see where to type or anything!!!! :-?

      Everything is black!!!!


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 05, 2007, 01:02:58 PM
I've been thinking alot lately about the blood in the car turning into chocolate & cleaning fluid discussion we;ve been having.

I don't ever recall any comments from Deepak, Joran or Satish about the car being cut up for samples.  I don't know about the average person, but I would be mightily po'd if my car were cut up.  It would mean expenses to replace the head liner and backseat cover.  I would be indignant especially if I kept my car immaculate like Deepak claims he did. I'd also be very angry if I were an innocent person this happened too.

We know Deepak talked.  He talked to John or Jones I forget about the family hatching the plan around the poool.  He talked to SKeeter.  Why no commments about the car?  Doesn't seem right to me.  Maybe b/c he knew it was a different car and not his?



He is not going to comment about the car if there is blood in it because it makes him look even more guilty.  He had that interior replaced.  He had 10 days to replace everything.  The ALE could have said his car was torn apart when actually they were taking the new interior he put in the car and using it as part of the evidence they were sending to the forensic institute in Holland and saying this is part of his car.  Of course there would be no evidence on it because they knew it was all newly replaced.  It is impossible that there was no trace of Natalee in that car.  JMO.
Good afternoon Monkeys
Didn't the guy from Automotive Enterprises or where ever say in a PV that parts of the inside of the car was replaced?I know I read that somewhere.
I actually think there were 2 cars involved and I don't think even by the 3rd day into this case,that Deepak had much say so about anything....especially anything to do with his car that may have had evidences in it.
Someone higher up was pulling those strings from the get go IMO.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 05, 2007, 01:04:12 PM
  Well I figured out what is wrong with my chat, I can get in but I did sometning in my Options to my backgrounds and its all black and I can't see it to fix it.  LOL  I can see what everyone is saying but I can't see where to type or anything!!!! :-?

      Everything is black!!!!
Auntiem - go back into chat and OPTIONS.  Make sure the first column says Windows XP, them change your font color to black or something.  Also, you can make your background grey.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Auntiem on August 05, 2007, 01:06:01 PM
  That's the Problem!!!!  I can't SEE Options!!!!!  I've been playing around in the dark tring to find it!!!Can't find Options in the DARK!!!


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: San on August 05, 2007, 01:07:27 PM
  That's the Problem!!!!  I can't SEE Options!!!!!  I've been playing around in the dark tring to find it!!!Can't find Options in the DARK!!!

Turn the light on :lol:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Auntiem on August 05, 2007, 01:08:40 PM
    No lights!!! Waaaaa!!!!!1 :sad: :sad: :sad: :sad:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 05, 2007, 01:09:48 PM
    No lights!!! Waaaaa!!!!!1 :sad: :sad: :sad: :sad:

We need to let Dugga know.  Maybe he can help. When I see him I'll let him know.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Auntiem on August 05, 2007, 01:10:04 PM
 Not even a candle!!!! :sad:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Auntiem on August 05, 2007, 01:10:57 PM
    No lights!!! Waaaaa!!!!!1 :sad: :sad: :sad: :sad:

We need to let Dugga know.  Maybe he can help. When I see him I'll let him know.



Thank you, Klass :smt052


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: SunFreak2 on August 05, 2007, 01:13:13 PM

FWIW - and you can take with a grain of salt, but I've been told by someone who claims to know Deepak that his car was torn apart.  That's not to say there wasn't a 2nd car.

I can believe.   Police are not very gentle with other folks belomgings when they are on a mission to find something.  I've been robbed and that was bad enough, cannot imagine a police search warrant.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 05, 2007, 01:16:38 PM
I wish we didn't have chat...  :shock:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 05, 2007, 01:17:10 PM
I wish we didn't have chat...  :shock:

where is my avatar? 


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 05, 2007, 01:24:18 PM
I wish we didn't have chat...  :shock:

Photobucket is undergoing some maintenance, could be why your avatar isn't showing up


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 05, 2007, 01:25:46 PM
Maybe what we need to do with the Chat room is open it up durring certain hours?  Keep it closed some of the time? 


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 05, 2007, 01:27:14 PM
Dang, I thought for sure that would bring a response... :lol:


I read somewhere yesterday... the white car following jk2 - was that from joran's book?  but do we have any idea if that is factual? 


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 05, 2007, 01:29:20 PM
Maybe what we need to do with the Chat room is open it up durring certain hours?  Keep it closed some of the time? 

No apparently everyone loves it... :lol:   it's just so quiet here!!


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 05, 2007, 01:30:46 PM
Dang, I thought for sure that would bring a response... :lol:


I read somewhere yesterday... the white car following jk2 - was that from joran's book?  but do we have any idea if that is factual? 

Only that it's mentioned in the statements, either Deepak or Satish's and we know how factual the statements are.

I still wonder if the reference to the white car is because Guido was following them to their "destination" to "party" with the girl they drugged.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 05, 2007, 01:32:20 PM
Dang, I thought for sure that would bring a response... :lol:


I read somewhere yesterday... the white car following jk2 - was that from joran's book?  but do we have any idea if that is factual? 

Only that it's mentioned in the statements, either Deepak or Satish's and we know how factual the statements are.

I still wonder if the reference to the white car is because Guido was following them to their "destination" to "party" with the girl they drugged.

Makes me wonder about that...


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: SunFreak2 on August 05, 2007, 01:33:30 PM
Dang, I thought for sure that would bring a response... :lol:


I read somewhere yesterday... the white car following jk2 - was that from joran's book?  but do we have any idea if that is factual? 

Only that it's mentioned in the statements, either Deepak or Satish's and we know how factual the statements are.

I still wonder if the reference to the white car is because Guido was following them to their "destination" to "party" with the girl they drugged.

I wish we knew what time Quido got off work that night.  Art Wood said he was working as croupier in poker room that night.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 05, 2007, 01:34:48 PM
Dang, I thought for sure that would bring a response... :lol:


I read somewhere yesterday... the white car following jk2 - was that from joran's book?  but do we have any idea if that is factual? 

Only that it's mentioned in the statements, either Deepak or Satish's and we know how factual the statements are.

I still wonder if the reference to the white car is because Guido was following them to their "destination" to "party" with the girl they drugged.

Makes me wonder about that...
Apprently, Guido had a white Nissan Sentra.  Why did Guido have to leave Aruba so quick?  Did he have scratches on his face?  Why was he detained in the NL on grounds of kidnapping, murder and HEAVY BATTERY?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 05, 2007, 01:35:09 PM
Well I have become convinced that guido is somehow involved... and the charge of heavy battery....



Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: SunFreak2 on August 05, 2007, 01:35:20 PM
Dang, I thought for sure that would bring a response... :lol:


I read somewhere yesterday... the white car following jk2 - was that from joran's book?  but do we have any idea if that is factual? 

Only that it's mentioned in the statements, either Deepak or Satish's and we know how factual the statements are.

I still wonder if the reference to the white car is because Guido was following them to their "destination" to "party" with the girl they drugged.

I wish we knew what time Quido got off work that night.  Art Wood said he was working as croupier in poker room that night.

Wasn't the white car supposed to have turned in at the HI when they went straight on toward the Marriott & Lighthouse?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 05, 2007, 01:37:03 PM
maybe the white car thought they were headed to the HI... wasn't the HI the place where Freddy liked to film?  As in the Loco Stephy...??


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: SunFreak2 on August 05, 2007, 01:37:52 PM


Wasn't the white car supposed to have turned in at the HI when they went straight on toward the Marriott & Lighthouse?

Or was that part of the fabrication to protect Guido?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 05, 2007, 01:38:37 PM
maybe the white car thought they were headed to the HI... wasn't the HI the place where Freddy liked to film?  As in the Loco Stephy...??

Loco Stephy was the Mill Resort


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 05, 2007, 01:40:29 PM


Wasn't the white car supposed to have turned in at the HI when they went straight on toward the Marriott & Lighthouse?

Or was that part of the fabrication to protect Guido?

and we now know that guido is the cousin of arlene  - who was on all the time during this "investigation"... I have to wonder how exactly he was charged with heavy battery, I mean he wasn't in the car, this we know.... that further leads me to believe that they were never at the beach.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: SunFreak2 on August 05, 2007, 01:42:02 PM
maybe the white car thought they were headed to the HI... wasn't the HI the place where Freddy liked to film?  As in the Loco Stephy...??

I thought the Loco Stephy episode was at the Wyndham or the Mills.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 05, 2007, 01:42:10 PM
maybe the white car thought they were headed to the HI... wasn't the HI the place where Freddy liked to film?  As in the Loco Stephy...??

Loco Stephy was the Mill Resort

Ok... just trying to figure it all out...


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 05, 2007, 01:44:43 PM
maybe the white car thought they were headed to the HI... wasn't the HI the place where Freddy liked to film?  As in the Loco Stephy...??

Loco Stephy was the Mill Resort

Ok... just trying to figure it all out...

still says to me the beach story is bunk....


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: SunFreak2 on August 05, 2007, 01:45:15 PM
GvC drove a white Nissan Sentra too didn't he?  How is he involved - just the drug angle?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 05, 2007, 01:46:23 PM
GvC drove a white Nissan Sentra too didn't he?  How is he involved - just the drug angle?

I don't remember what GVC drove


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 05, 2007, 01:47:48 PM
GvC drove a white Nissan Sentra too didn't he?  How is he involved - just the drug angle?

I have never been all that convinced that he was completely involved... I don't know why, but I think that he was in a different leauge than this group of pimps...

I think he is probably guilty of giving drugs to girls  - but I think he would be more into giving the girls x... or coke...



Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: SunFreak2 on August 05, 2007, 01:49:44 PM
Also if Joran took a bunch of kids to his house to party all the time.  The Karen episode where she was drugged and Joran couldn't remember if Freddy or the Viana kid was there.  That tells me he is lying that his family cared or could even hear any noise coming from Joran's apt.  Also it is said his Apt has a little kitchen. Yet he goes into the big house that night for a snack and some porn after leaving Nat at the beach?  I don't believe it.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: SunFreak2 on August 05, 2007, 01:51:17 PM
GvC drove a white Nissan Sentra too didn't he?  How is he involved - just the drug angle?

I don't remember what GVC drove

Wasn't that why he wa arrested b/c of the white car?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Destiny on August 05, 2007, 01:54:12 PM
I know this sounds stoooopid of me...but, does anyone know what time of the day/night it is in Aruba right now?

Thanks in advance....Destiny

I believe Aruba is the same as our Eastern time.  So it's approx noon in Aruba right now.

Thanks Klaas...got some phone calls to make ;-)
Dest

Well...made some phone calls...talked with a very nice man at police station in Aruba...Klaas...should I send you private email...not sure what to post here.
Don't even know if it's been posted before.

Destiny


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 05, 2007, 01:55:24 PM
Also if Joran took a bunch of kids to his house to party all the time.  The Karen episode where she was drugged and Joran couldn't remember if Freddy or the Viana kid was there.  That tells me he is lying that his family cared or could even hear any noise coming from Joran's apt.  Also it is said his Apt has a little kitchen. Yet he goes into the big house that night for a snack and some porn after leaving Nat at the beach?  I don't believe it.


exactly and the other distrubing thing about that is the fact that they all watched... it was pretty much in the open...and the fact that anita could describe in such detail her underwear... I just think that the mention of hte house was to cover it up if someone noticed they were there....

no witnesses at the beach, the woman having been accosted the prior week, those are just things that solidify my belief they weren't there.

I will always be convinced that in and among all the lies, there is a shred, however faint of truth.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: San on August 05, 2007, 01:56:14 PM
Also if Joran took a bunch of kids to his house to party all the time.  The Karen episode where she was drugged and Joran couldn't remember if Freddy or the Viana kid was there.  That tells me he is lying that his family cared or could even hear any noise coming from Joran's apt.  Also it is said his Apt has a little kitchen. Yet he goes into the big house that night for a snack and some porn after leaving Nat at the beach?  I don't believe it.


I believe Natalee was taken into the big house after Joran injured her in his apartment and Paulus helped move her in there.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Marlee on August 05, 2007, 01:56:56 PM
I know this sounds stoooopid of me...but, does anyone know what time of the day/night it is in Aruba right now?

Thanks in advance....Destiny

I believe Aruba is the same as our Eastern time.  So it's approx noon in Aruba right now.

Thanks Klaas...got some phone calls to make ;-)
Dest

Well...made some phone calls...talked with a very nice man at police station in Aruba...Klaas...should I send you private email...not sure what to post here.
Don't even know if it's been posted before.

Destiny


Good job Destiny on calling them.  I have been waiting to hear if they would talk to you.  Can't wait to hear what they said.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 05, 2007, 01:57:27 PM
Destiny... that should be interesting!  I would love to hear more...


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: SunFreak2 on August 05, 2007, 01:58:12 PM
Also if Joran took a bunch of kids to his house to party all the time.  The Karen episode where she was drugged and Joran couldn't remember if Freddy or the Viana kid was there.  That tells me he is lying that his family cared or could even hear any noise coming from Joran's apt.  Also it is said his Apt has a little kitchen. Yet he goes into the big house that night for a snack and some porn after leaving Nat at the beach?  I don't believe it.


I agree, Mrs Red.  One has to definitely read between the lines with them.

exactly and the other distrubing thing about that is the fact that they all watched... it was pretty much in the open...and the fact that anita could describe in such detail her underwear... I just think that the mention of hte house was to cover it up if someone noticed they were there....

no witnesses at the beach, the woman having been accosted the prior week, those are just things that solidify my belief they weren't there.

I will always be convinced that in and among all the lies, there is a shred, however faint of truth.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 05, 2007, 01:59:01 PM
I know this sounds stoooopid of me...but, does anyone know what time of the day/night it is in Aruba right now?

Thanks in advance....Destiny

I believe Aruba is the same as our Eastern time.  So it's approx noon in Aruba right now.

Thanks Klaas...got some phone calls to make ;-)
Dest

Well...made some phone calls...talked with a very nice man at police station in Aruba...Klaas...should I send you private email...not sure what to post here.
Don't even know if it's been posted before.

Destiny

Thanks Destiny - I'll check my email! 


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Destiny on August 05, 2007, 02:00:07 PM
Destiny... that should be interesting!  I would love to hear more...

I'm going to go ahead and call the other number I was referred to....he's been moved.

Dest....waiting for Klaas


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: SunFreak2 on August 05, 2007, 02:00:41 PM
Also if Joran took a bunch of kids to his house to party all the time.  The Karen episode where she was drugged and Joran couldn't remember if Freddy or the Viana kid was there.  That tells me he is lying that his family cared or could even hear any noise coming from Joran's apt.  Also it is said his Apt has a little kitchen. Yet he goes into the big house that night for a snack and some porn after leaving Nat at the beach?  I don't believe it.


I agree, Mrs Red.  One has to definitely read between the lines with them.

exactly and the other distrubing thing about that is the fact that they all watched... it was pretty much in the open...and the fact that anita could describe in such detail her underwear... I just think that the mention of hte house was to cover it up if someone noticed they were there....

no witnesses at the beach, the woman having been accosted the prior week, those are just things that solidify my belief they weren't there.

I will always be convinced that in and among all the lies, there is a shred, however faint of truth.

and with me too, I guess.  :2doh:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Destiny on August 05, 2007, 02:01:21 PM
Destiny... that should be interesting!  I would love to hear more...

I'm going to go ahead and call the other number I was referred to....he's been moved.

Dest....waiting for Klaas

Klaas what email addy?

TX...Dest


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: fran on August 05, 2007, 02:03:08 PM
When I joined the monkeys, I thought I'd have more time etc to post, but it takes me so long to catch up I forgot what I was gonna say.  :2doh:

Now I don't want to get involved in saying anything, because I wanna know what Destiny found out. :wink:

fran


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 05, 2007, 02:04:05 PM
Destiny... that should be interesting!  I would love to hear more...

I'm going to go ahead and call the other number I was referred to....he's been moved.

Dest....waiting for Klaas

Email to:  smklaas@hotmail.com


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: SunFreak2 on August 05, 2007, 02:05:14 PM
When I joined the monkeys, I thought I'd have more time etc to post, but it takes me so long to catch up I forgot what I was gonna say.  :2doh:

Now I don't want to get involved in saying anything, because I wanna know what Destiny found out. :wink:
fran

Ditto, Fran.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 05, 2007, 02:05:16 PM
When I joined the monkeys, I thought I'd have more time etc to post, but it takes me so long to catch up I forgot what I was gonna say.  :2doh:

Now I don't want to get involved in saying anything, because I wanna know what Destiny found out. :wink:

fran

sometimes that happens to me... so what you can do is just post what you are thinking with a side note that you are behind... at least that's what we all do... :lol:  and below the posting window you can scroll and see what has been said....

I am dying to hear what Destiny found out as well...


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: SunFreak2 on August 05, 2007, 02:07:42 PM
Sounds like Destiny called Aruba about something!  Cool.  That takes guts.  Cheers for Destiny.   :D


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Destiny on August 05, 2007, 02:11:07 PM
When I joined the monkeys, I thought I'd have more time etc to post, but it takes me so long to catch up I forgot what I was gonna say.  :2doh:

Now I don't want to get involved in saying anything, because I wanna know what Destiny found out. :wink:

fran

sometimes that happens to me... so what you can do is just post what you are thinking with a side note that you are behind... at least that's what we all do... :lol:  and below the posting window you can scroll and see what has been said....

I am dying to hear what Destiny found out as well...

am on phone noe w/oter place...finding out much


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 05, 2007, 02:12:54 PM
When I joined the monkeys, I thought I'd have more time etc to post, but it takes me so long to catch up I forgot what I was gonna say.  :2doh:

Now I don't want to get involved in saying anything, because I wanna know what Destiny found out. :wink:

fran

sometimes that happens to me... so what you can do is just post what you are thinking with a side note that you are behind... at least that's what we all do... :lol:  and below the posting window you can scroll and see what has been said....

I am dying to hear what Destiny found out as well...

am on phone noe w/oter place...finding out much

Did you see my email addy above?  Wonder how much they are telling you is truth vs. BS?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: fran on August 05, 2007, 02:13:25 PM
One thing that has always bothered me is D/S being arrested the day after D said he'd do a lie dectector test with Skeeters after he checked with his attorney. I mean, how convenient, D/S are arrested AGAIN, ehhh........why??????

Dompig said they had to have new evidence. So I ran across this. What happened to this 'new evidence' and why were they ALL THREE released just days later?

fran

http://www.indiadaily.com/breaking_news/43660.asp

Brothers held again in Natalee Holloway case

 Aug. 26, 2005

After being detained and then released last month in Natalee Holloway's disappearance, two brothers were arrested again Friday in Aruba on suspicion they acted "together with other people" in raping and killing the Alabama teen, the prosecutor's office said. Without elaborating on the evidence, the office said in a statement that "new facts and circumstances" led them to re-arrest Satish Kalpoe, 18 and brother Deepak, 21. "They are suspected of the primary criminal act of together with other people committing premeditated murder, alternately together with other people murdering somebody, more alternately rob a person of her liberty with fatal consequences and even more alternately raping somebody," the statement said. "Aside from these suspicions against the two brothers, there are new suspicions, which at this point the prosecutor is not commenting on."

 ......................more of the article at the link.....................


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 05, 2007, 02:13:35 PM
that is an important question Klaas....


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Destiny on August 05, 2007, 02:14:08 PM
OMG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!....Klaas I'm going to email my phone # to you

Dest


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 05, 2007, 02:15:43 PM
OMG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!....Klaas I'm going to email my phone # to you

Dest

Don't bother emailing me your phone number.  I don't speak with anyone in the forum via phone.  Just email me.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 05, 2007, 02:16:46 PM
Fran,
that's interesting... I don't think I had ever paid such attention to that particular statement, before. that along with others. :shock:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: fran on August 05, 2007, 02:18:24 PM
Fran,
that's interesting... I don't think I had ever paid such attention to that particular statement, before. that along with others. :shock:

Notice when they're referring to additional person(s), they're using plural, which would mean JK2 + ???????

JMHO
fran


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Destiny on August 05, 2007, 02:18:46 PM
OMG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!....Klaas I'm going to email my phone # to you

Dest

Don't bother emailing me your phone number.  I don't speak with anyone in the forum via phone.  Just email me.
OMG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!....Klaas I'm going to email my phone # to you

Dest

Don't bother emailing me your phone number.  I don't speak with anyone in the forum via phone.  Just email me.

Ok will send as soon as I type it out


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 05, 2007, 02:20:43 PM
OMG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!....Klaas I'm going to email my phone # to you

Dest

Don't bother emailing me your phone number.  I don't speak with anyone in the forum via phone.  Just email me.

DESTINY - Please check your email  :-?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: fran on August 05, 2007, 02:20:58 PM
OMG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!....Klaas I'm going to email my phone # to you

Dest

Wow Destiny!

This sounds exciting.

We're waiting. :D

fran


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: SunFreak2 on August 05, 2007, 02:22:46 PM
Fran,
that's interesting... I don't think I had ever paid such attention to that particular statement, before. that along with others. :shock:

Notice when they're referring to additional person(s), they're using plural, which would mean JK2 + ???????

JMHO
fran

That was when Freddy was arrested - with the Kalpoes the second time  on the sex angle.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: SunFreak2 on August 05, 2007, 02:25:15 PM


That was when Freddy was arrested - with the Kalpoes the second time  on the sex angle.

I wonder if those charges against Freddy have been dropped or will be dropped?  ANyone know?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Destiny on August 05, 2007, 02:27:11 PM
Klaas has all info I had now....beg at her door.

Destiny


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on August 05, 2007, 02:27:58 PM
Klaas has all info I had now....beg at her door.

Destiny

 :lol:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: San on August 05, 2007, 02:28:48 PM
One thing that has always bothered me is D/S being arrested the day after D said he'd do a lie dectector test with Skeeters after he checked with his attorney. I mean, how convenient, D/S are arrested AGAIN, ehhh........why??????

Dompig said they had to have new evidence. So I ran across this. What happened to this 'new evidence' and why were they ALL THREE released just days later?

fran

http://www.indiadaily.com/breaking_news/43660.asp

Brothers held again in Natalee Holloway case

 Aug. 26, 2005

After being detained and then released last month in Natalee Holloway's disappearance, two brothers were arrested again Friday in Aruba on suspicion they acted "together with other people" in raping and killing the Alabama teen, the prosecutor's office said. Without elaborating on the evidence, the office said in a statement that "new facts and circumstances" led them to re-arrest Satish Kalpoe, 18 and brother Deepak, 21. "They are suspected of the primary criminal act of together with other people committing premeditated murder, alternately together with other people murdering somebody, more alternately rob a person of her liberty with fatal consequences and even more alternately raping somebody," the statement said. "Aside from these suspicions against the two brothers, there are new suspicions, which at this point the prosecutor is not commenting on."

 ......................more of the article at the link.....................

Very interesting that this is the reason why they were rearrested.  How do they know other people were involved.  This makes me sick because they have all this information and are unwilling to prosecute them.  The only reason they brought them back in was to let them know they had this information on them and they better shut their mouths.  Joran was in jail so he wouldn't open his big mouth and this is the same reason they brought the Kalpoes back in.  What evidence was presentent to the judge to hold them on this.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 05, 2007, 02:29:02 PM


That was when Freddy was arrested - with the Kalpoes the second time  on the sex angle.

I wonder if those charges against Freddy have been dropped or will be dropped?  ANyone know?


I don't know... that aspect is completely silent...


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: fran on August 05, 2007, 02:30:28 PM


That was when Freddy was arrested - with the Kalpoes the second time  on the sex angle.

I wonder if those charges against Freddy have been dropped or will be dropped?  ANyone know?

You're right SunFreak, I forgot about Freddy. They were able to sweep that episode under the rug and release everyone when Katrina hit. They thought the U.S. attention wouldn't turn back to Natalee and Aruba in the aftermath of Katrina.

Croes, assistant to the PM asked "HOW CAN WE SHUT HER UP?" referring to Beth. I guess he thought Katrina was his golden opportunity, as was 911 for Condit and Chandra Levy. :-x

Guess what? He was wrong. :wink:

JMHO
fran


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: SunFreak2 on August 05, 2007, 02:32:45 PM
I think they rearrested the Kalpoes and arrested Freddy to try to break Joran.  But Joran already kew the fix was in and he didn't have to worry.  Paulus's buddy Judge Rick Smid to the rescue.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: fran on August 05, 2007, 02:34:32 PM


That was when Freddy was arrested - with the Kalpoes the second time  on the sex angle.

I wonder if those charges against Freddy have been dropped or will be dropped?  ANyone know?


I don't know... that aspect is completely silent...

IIRC, the sex angle was dropped as they said it wasn't what they appeared, the underage girl had on a bathing suit. Kinda' like what many think was Natalee's blouse that turned into a 'fishnet.'

fran


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 05, 2007, 02:35:12 PM
Destiny - I just emailed you.  Why don't you go ahead and post what they told you.  I don't see a problem with it. 


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 05, 2007, 02:35:56 PM
I agree San and Fran ... and SUN...

the fix was in and they rounded up ppl to keep them quiet.

As for Condit and Chandra Levy.... rightfully so, IMO his career is over... and he has gone away...


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: SunFreak2 on August 05, 2007, 02:36:01 PM
I think they rearrested the Kalpoes and arrested Freddy to try to break Joran.  But Joran already kew the fix was in and he didn't have to worry.  Paulus's buddy Judge Rick Smid to the rescue.

Interetsingly, even though it was appealled, Judge Rick Smid was part of the appeals panel of 3 judges who have to unanymousky decide the outcome.  It was all fixed ahead of time.  :sad:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: fran on August 05, 2007, 02:39:26 PM
I agree with San. They rearrested K2 to SHUT THEM UP. Joran already said in the secretly recorded  :shock: police tape that he could hold out for the # days. (160 ?) He KNEW that would be the end for him.

IMO, Deepak told Koch, Koch told whoever, K2 were rearrested. Katrina hits, the U.S. MSM leaves town and JK2 are released. The also misled the U.S. media by saying they could be brought back in at any time for questioning, yadda, yadday,..........but that was a big fat LIE! :2doh:

JMO
fran


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 05, 2007, 02:39:49 PM
Dang, I thought for sure that would bring a response... :lol:


I read somewhere yesterday... the white car following jk2 - was that from joran's book?  but do we have any idea if that is factual? 

Only that it's mentioned in the statements, either Deepak or Satish's and we know how factual the statements are.

I still wonder if the reference to the white car is because Guido was following them to their "destination" to "party" with the girl they drugged.
Do we know for sure that Deepak stopped at another bar after getting Natalee in his car?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 05, 2007, 02:40:41 PM
I agree with San. They rearrested K2 to SHUT THEM UP. Joran already said in the secretly recorded  :shock: police tape that he could hold out for the # days. (160 ?) He KNEW that would be the end for him.

IMO, Deepak told Koch, Koch told whoever, K2 were rearrested. Katrina hits, the U.S. MSM leaves town and JK2 are released. The also misled the U.S. media by saying they could be brought back in at any time for questioning, yadda, yadday,..........but that was a big fat LIE! :2doh:

JMO
fran

agreed....


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Destiny on August 05, 2007, 02:41:32 PM
Destiny - I just emailed you.  Why don't you go ahead and post what they told you.  I don't see a problem with it. 

OK please excuse spelling of names.


First call to Aruban police dept where Lorenzo was being held...nice man there told me L had been moved to corrections inst. I got him to give me a contact name and # there...I called there 001 297 XXX XXXX asked for XXXXXXX, and XXXXXXX got on the computer and checked all for me.

Latest info Lorenzo van Rijn, Daniel Winkler sp? and Martin Winkler were all released on July 25th...no court date set...they had private meeting with judge...only one still in jail at corrections inst. is Ramon for guns  Lorenzo is still on Aruba and back at home.

That's the best I can do for now     Destiny


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 05, 2007, 02:42:02 PM
Dang, I thought for sure that would bring a response... :lol:


I read somewhere yesterday... the white car following jk2 - was that from joran's book?  but do we have any idea if that is factual? 

Only that it's mentioned in the statements, either Deepak or Satish's and we know how factual the statements are.

I still wonder if the reference to the white car is because Guido was following them to their "destination" to "party" with the girl they drugged.
Do we know for sure that Deepak stopped at another bar after getting Natalee in his car?

I don't.... but I am sure there is a monkey that knows...


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on August 05, 2007, 02:42:06 PM
I think they rearrested the Kalpoes and arrested Freddy to try to break Joran.  But Joran already kew the fix was in and he didn't have to worry.  Paulus's buddy Judge Rick Smid to the rescue.

Interetsingly, even though it was appealled, Judge Rick Smid was part of the appeals panel of 3 judges who have to unanymousky decide the outcome.  It was all fixed ahead of time.  :sad:

Was Curacao's tourism affected in comparison with Aruba's after the NH fiasco?  If it's been posted, I didn't see or absorb it.  Just thinking of where these judges were from.  (I don't mean to divert from your present conversation)


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 05, 2007, 02:45:15 PM
Destiny - I just emailed you.  Why don't you go ahead and post what they told you.  I don't see a problem with it. 

OK please excuse spelling of names.


First call to Aruban police dept where Lorenzo was being held...nice man there told me L had been moved to corrections inst. I got him to give me a contact name and # there...I called there 001 297 XXX XXXX asked for XXXXXXX, and XXXXXXX got on the computer and checked all for me.

Latest info Lorenzo van Rijn, Daniel Winkler sp? and Martin Winkler were all released on July 25th...no court date set...they had private meeting with judge...only one still in jail at corrections inst. is Ramon for guns  Lorenzo is still on Aruba and back at home.

That's the best I can do for now     Destiny


Thanks Destiny!

So Lorenzo was released from KIA on July 25th according to them.  He is still in Aruba and there has been no court date set. 


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: SunFreak2 on August 05, 2007, 02:46:36 PM
Dang, I thought for sure that would bring a response... :lol:


I read somewhere yesterday... the white car following jk2 - was that from joran's book?  but do we have any idea if that is factual? 

Only that it's mentioned in the statements, either Deepak or Satish's and we know how factual the statements are.

I still wonder if the reference to the white car is because Guido was following them to their "destination" to "party" with the girl they drugged.
Do we know for sure that Deepak stopped at another bar after getting Natalee in his car?

I don't.... but I am sure there is a monkey that knows...

Rumour has it that the bar was CHOOSE-A-NAME


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: BlueKYGirl on August 05, 2007, 02:46:42 PM
So will there be a court date for Lorenzo, or is this another example of a thug being set free by the Aruban legal system?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: San on August 05, 2007, 02:48:07 PM
Destiny - I just emailed you.  Why don't you go ahead and post what they told you.  I don't see a problem with it. 

OK please excuse spelling of names.


First call to Aruban police dept where Lorenzo was being held...nice man there told me L had been moved to corrections inst. I got him to give me a contact name and # there...I called there 001 297 XXX XXXX asked for XXXXXXX, and XXXXXXX got on the computer and checked all for me.

Latest info Lorenzo van Rijn, Daniel Winkler sp? and Martin Winkler were all released on July 25th...no court date set...they had private meeting with judge...only one still in jail at corrections inst. is Ramon for guns  Lorenzo is still on Aruba and back at home.

That's the best I can do for now     Destiny


Thank you Destiny.   I am not surprised by this information.  They are all a bunch of sneaks.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 05, 2007, 02:48:18 PM
I don't know about Curacoa's, but we know that Bonaire has increased....


Destiny... thank you for the update.  Y'all are we sure that lorenzo is involved?  I keep waffling on that one...

I mean I am sure that jk2 are involved,

convinced that freddy and guido are...

wondering how, but I believe that steve croes is material somehow... besides being a dumbass...

and I think that CnC's should be sued from their home office in the US for hiring bartenders that are willing to put drugs into girl's drinks... and the ALE , Dennis Jacobs and Jossy have both said that is COMMON KNOWLEDGE

so there would be a case against CnC's... and there is "minimum contacts"... jmo. 


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on August 05, 2007, 02:48:22 PM
Thanks for the info Destiny.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: fran on August 05, 2007, 02:49:35 PM
Destiny - I just emailed you.  Why don't you go ahead and post what they told you.  I don't see a problem with it. 

OK please excuse spelling of names.


First call to Aruban police dept where Lorenzo was being held...nice man there told me L had been moved to corrections inst. I got him to give me a contact name and # there...I called there 001 297 XXX XXXX asked for XXXXXXX, and XXXXXXX got on the computer and checked all for me.

Latest info Lorenzo van Rijn, Daniel Winkler sp? and Martin Winkler were all released on July 25th...no court date set...they had private meeting with judge...only one still in jail at corrections inst. is Ramon for guns  Lorenzo is still on Aruba and back at home.

That's the best I can do for now     Destiny


Thanks for the info Destiny. Oh, and for all the phone calls too! :cool:

Interesting, they make a BIG DEAL about arresting the drug dealers and have behind closed door meetings and quietly release them. So............drug dealers are handled the same way as the 'alledged' murderers and rapists.
That should make the citizens of Aruba feel all warm and fuzzy and safe. NOT!

JMO
fran


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Destiny on August 05, 2007, 02:49:36 PM
I was told...no court date, no trial...private mediation with Judge

All Go Home except Ramon.

Dest


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 05, 2007, 02:49:45 PM
One thing that has always bothered me is D/S being arrested the day after D said he'd do a lie dectector test with Skeeters after he checked with his attorney. I mean, how convenient, D/S are arrested AGAIN, ehhh........why??????

Dompig said they had to have new evidence. So I ran across this. What happened to this 'new evidence' and why were they ALL THREE released just days later?

fran

http://www.indiadaily.com/breaking_news/43660.asp

Brothers held again in Natalee Holloway case

 Aug. 26, 2005

After being detained and then released last month in Natalee Holloway's disappearance, two brothers were arrested again Friday in Aruba on suspicion they acted "together with other people" in raping and killing the Alabama teen, the prosecutor's office said. Without elaborating on the evidence, the office said in a statement that "new facts and circumstances" led them to re-arrest Satish Kalpoe, 18 and brother Deepak, 21. "They are suspected of the primary criminal act of together with other people committing premeditated murder, alternately together with other people murdering somebody, more alternately rob a person of her liberty with fatal consequences and even more alternately raping somebody," the statement said. "Aside from these suspicions against the two brothers, there are new suspicions, which at this point the prosecutor is not commenting on."

 ......................more of the article at the link.....................
Hi Fran
I still to this day believe the Kalpoe's were rearrested because Deepak was talking to Mr Skeeters.Then arresting Satish right along with Deepak and with those same"charges"to me was like them telling Deepak"yeah,go ahead and keep running your mouth and we'll pin this whole thing on you both!".


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 05, 2007, 02:50:33 PM
I don't know about Curacoa's, but we know that Bonaire has increased....


Destiny... thank you for the update.  Y'all are we sure that lorenzo is involved?  I keep waffling on that one...

I mean I am sure that jk2 are involved,

convinced that freddy and guido are...

wondering how, but I believe that steve croes is material somehow... besides being a dumbass...

and I think that CnC's should be sued from their home office in the US for hiring bartenders that are willing to put drugs into girl's drinks... and the ALE , Dennis Jacobs and Jossy have both said that is COMMON KNOWLEDGE

so there would be a case against CnC's... and there is "minimum contacts"... jmo. 

Mrs. Red - LORENZO was brought in for questioning early in the case.  LORENZO is one of the first people mentioned in the case.  YES, I do think Lorenzo is involved in some way.  He may not have been directly involved with Natalee but could be involved with either supplying drugs or body disposal.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 05, 2007, 02:50:49 PM
So will there be a court date for Lorenzo, or is this another example of a thug being set free by the Aruban legal system?

I wonder why on an island that doesnt' care at all about drug use he was arrested.... i mean in reality (theirs, that is...) what is 100 pot plants? 


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: SunFreak2 on August 05, 2007, 02:51:35 PM
Destiny - I just emailed you.  Why don't you go ahead and post what they told you.  I don't see a problem with it. 

OK please excuse spelling of names.


First call to Aruban police dept where Lorenzo was being held...nice man there told me L had been moved to corrections inst. I got him to give me a contact name and # there...I called there 001 297 XXX XXXX asked for XXXXXXX, and XXXXXXX got on the computer and checked all for me.

Latest info Lorenzo van Rijn, Daniel Winkler sp? and Martin Winkler were all released on July 25th...no court date set...they had private meeting with judge...only one still in jail at corrections inst. is Ramon for guns  Lorenzo is still on Aruba and back at home.

That's the best I can do for now     Destiny


I thought the other guys last names were Vrojlik.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: San on August 05, 2007, 02:52:01 PM
The only other person I know of who had a private meeting with the judge was Joran before he was released.

This proves to me that Lorenzo is a Sloot.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 05, 2007, 02:52:07 PM
Klass... I forgot he was brought in for questioning....  :shock:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: BlueKYGirl on August 05, 2007, 02:52:48 PM
I was told...no court date, no trial...private mediation with Judge

All Go Home except Ramon.

Dest

More justice for the guilty on Aruba.

Thanks for checking into it!


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 05, 2007, 02:53:31 PM
The only other person I know of who had a private meeting with the judge was Joran before he was released.

This proves to me that Lorenzo is a Sloot.


and we do have jossy saying that he is joran's half brother....


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: San on August 05, 2007, 02:53:37 PM
So will there be a court date for Lorenzo, or is this another example of a thug being set free by the Aruban legal system?

I wonder why on an island that doesnt' care at all about drug use he was arrested.... i mean in reality (theirs, that is...) what is 100 pot plants? 

And 100 pot plants was a bullshit excluse to bring this other psycho Sloot in and let him know what the deal was.  Someone wasn't listening to the rules and they made sure he knows who is boss.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 05, 2007, 02:55:49 PM
So will there be a court date for Lorenzo, or is this another example of a thug being set free by the Aruban legal system?

I wonder why on an island that doesnt' care at all about drug use he was arrested.... i mean in reality (theirs, that is...) what is 100 pot plants? 

And 100 pot plants was a bullshit excluse to bring this other psycho Sloot in and let him know what the deal was.  Someone wasn't listening to the rules and they made sure he knows who is boss.

that makes sense to me...


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Destiny on August 05, 2007, 02:56:20 PM
Destiny - I just emailed you.  Why don't you go ahead and post what they told you.  I don't see a problem with it. 

OK please excuse spelling of names.


First call to Aruban police dept where Lorenzo was being held...nice man there told me L had been moved to corrections inst. I got him to give me a contact name and # there...I called there 001 297 XXX XXXX asked for XXXXXXX, and XXXXXXX got on the computer and checked all for me.

Latest info Lorenzo van Rijn, Daniel Winkler sp? and Martin Winkler were all released on July 25th...no court date set...they had private meeting with judge...only one still in jail at corrections inst. is Ramon for guns  Lorenzo is still on Aruba and back at home.

That's the best I can do for now     Destiny


I thought the other guys last names were Vrojlik.

I was on the phone with him trying to keep him talking and writing things/names down the best I could...I really couln't ask him to spell names for me....sorrry :-(   The only thing I might have messed up is the last names of Daniel and Martin.

The man I spoke with had very good english/but thick accent.  Sorry again

Dest


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: SunFreak2 on August 05, 2007, 02:59:21 PM
I'll be back - gotta run an errand.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 05, 2007, 02:59:54 PM
Destiny... don't be sorry...

that was a great find... and some cajones to call...!!


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 05, 2007, 03:01:44 PM
Dang, I thought for sure that would bring a response... :lol:


I read somewhere yesterday... the white car following jk2 - was that from joran's book?  but do we have any idea if that is factual? 

Only that it's mentioned in the statements, either Deepak or Satish's and we know how factual the statements are.

I still wonder if the reference to the white car is because Guido was following them to their "destination" to "party" with the girl they drugged.
Do we know for sure that Deepak stopped at another bar after getting Natalee in his car?

I don't.... but I am sure there is a monkey that knows...

Rumour has it that the bar was CHOOSE-A-NAME
Hi SF
Thanks,that's the bar that burned down.I wonder why he had to stop there if he did.Why not just call?Unless he had to pick something up or drop something off.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: fran on August 05, 2007, 03:02:16 PM
Hi Fran
I still to this day believe the Kalpoe's were rearrested because Deepak was talking to Mr Skeeters.Then arresting Satish right along with Deepak and with those same"charges"to me was like them telling Deepak"yeah,go ahead and keep running your mouth and we'll pin this whole thing on you both!".


Hasn't Joran been doing just that since he got out of jail? Trying to pin it on K2. I think he did it in jail too, but turned around and denied it to K2 in the police recording.

I agree with you KarmaRoundUp. I have always thought K2 were rearrested to 'shut them up!'

Am I the only one that thinks it a coinky-dink that K2's step dad JUST HAPPENED to buy the cyber cafe WHILE his two step sons were in jail? Somewhere, was it here? I read there was no $$ that changed hands. How could that be? Businesses are free in Aruba?

Dompig opened a buisness, was it free? A couple of the friends of Joran that were brought in for questioning and then ran to hide out in Holland with their families in hot pursuit! Did they give their lucrative businesses away? :shock:

What's the deal? :silent:

JMHO
fran


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: San on August 05, 2007, 03:02:42 PM
Destiny... don't be sorry...

that was a great find... and some cajones to call...!!

I agree and thank you again Destiny.

It that was me I would have stuttered and gotten every name wrong :lol:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 05, 2007, 03:03:26 PM
just thinking out loud... but is it possible that they ever mentioned or went to mambos?  I thought that was the bar that burnt down...

if not, why do I know that name???


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 05, 2007, 03:04:48 PM
fran ... well it seems that they all ended up with "better" jobs.... funny how that worked,

even steve croes ended up being the dj at CnC's


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: San on August 05, 2007, 03:06:17 PM
just thinking out loud... but is it possible that they ever mentioned or went to mambos?  I thought that was the bar that burnt down...

if not, why do I know that name???

I always get that bar mixed up with Choose a Name bar.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Auntiem on August 05, 2007, 03:06:50 PM
    It was Choose a Name that burned down......I think that MIP6 or Mark Purcell mentioned or worked as a bar tender there.  Or maybe told soneone to come hang out there with him.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on August 05, 2007, 03:07:10 PM
just thinking out loud... but is it possible that they ever mentioned or went to mambos?  I thought that was the bar that burnt down...

if not, why do I know that name???

I think that's the bar MIP6 owns?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Carnut on August 05, 2007, 03:08:36 PM
As usual I disagree on stopping at another bar other than CnC's

I think that came from confusion on the statements that they went from one bar to another bar within CnC's that night.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Auntiem on August 05, 2007, 03:09:23 PM
just thinking out loud... but is it possible that they ever mentioned or went to mambos?  I thought that was the bar that burnt down...

if not, why do I know that name???

I think that's the bar MIP6 owns?






BINGO!!!!!!


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 05, 2007, 03:12:32 PM
   It was Choose a Name that burned down......I think that MIP6 or Mark Purcell mentioned or worked as a bar tender there.  Or maybe told soneone to come hang out there with him.

Both Choose a Name AND Moomba's had a fire.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 05, 2007, 03:13:16 PM
As usual I disagree on stopping at another bar other than CnC's

I think that came from confusion on the statements that they went from one bar to another bar within CnC's that night.

Carnut - I agree.  The other bar was the one on the other side of the room at CnC.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on August 05, 2007, 03:13:50 PM
(http://www.coolaruba.com/album/albums/JULI%202007/KARMA%2028JULI/Back_to_La_Fiesta_%2814%29.jpg)

Karma Lounge July 27th



Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 05, 2007, 03:14:00 PM
just thinking out loud... but is it possible that they ever mentioned or went to mambos?  I thought that was the bar that burnt down...

if not, why do I know that name???

I think that's the bar MIP6 owns?






BINGO!!!!!!

Ok... so now we know his agenda... he owns a bar there...

it's interesting that he could have told someone to stop by....


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on August 05, 2007, 03:14:01 PM
Wow, Destiny! I'm impressed! That took "Hutzpah"!!!

Hi Guys! Just left the "you know you're a money when" thread. I highly recommend it for a "Spirit Lift" and great laugh!


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 05, 2007, 03:15:00 PM
   It was Choose a Name that burned down......I think that MIP6 or Mark Purcell mentioned or worked as a bar tender there.  Or maybe told soneone to come hang out there with him.

Both Choose a Name AND Moomba's had a fire.

Ok, so I am not totally confused then... good.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: jasmine on August 05, 2007, 03:16:36 PM
Hi Monkeys!  I've been lurking and reading (doing laundry too).  I think Lorenzo is involved somehow too.  There for a while, I thought maybe he was the one in the Holiday Inn Video sitting next to Natalee instead of Paulus, but I think someone acknowledged it was Paulus.  He may have been the one Paulus called to dispose of the body.   


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Carnut on August 05, 2007, 03:17:01 PM
    It was Choose a Name that burned down......I think that MIP6 or Mark Purcell mentioned or worked as a bar tender there.  Or maybe told soneone to come hang out there with him.

Both Choose a Name AND Moomba's had a fire.

Funny how bars tend to have fires, several local bars here have had fires as well.

Seems to be an industry problem.

I suspicion fires tend to provide a source of income to some from insurance when income isn't covering expenses.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 05, 2007, 03:17:31 PM
Bleached...

thanks.  I tend to forget how much can change in two years... it's like time stands still as far as seeing justice though... :-?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 05, 2007, 03:18:42 PM
Wow, Destiny! I'm impressed! That took "Hutzpah"!!!

Hi Guys! Just left the "you know you're a money when" thread. I highly recommend it for a "Spirit Lift" and great laugh!

Hey CBB... did you read thee whole thing?  LOL... did anyone email LV and explain????


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: fran on August 05, 2007, 03:18:42 PM
fran ... well it seems that they all ended up with "better" jobs.... funny how that worked,

even steve croes ended up being the dj at CnC's

Yes, and pappa VDS who flunked out of being a judge, just so happened to get a job with the attorney handling his son's case?

What really cracks me up, :lol: is that Aruba thinks if they talk in Dutch or papiamentu, that the Americans are too stupid to see what they're doing in plain site. They've been able to get away with this cra* for so long because they could intimidate their citizens into compliance, that's why they now hate us and our MSM so much. They can NOT SHUT US UP!!

What they are doing, what they did is obvious to a six year old. They think they're so slick, but they've made fools of themselves. They, honestly look ridiculous! When everyone compares them to the Keystone Cops they act all insulted, when in reality, it's the Keystone Cops who should be insulted!

Compared to ALE AND their tourist group and their spokesmen and on and on, the Keystone Cops look like professionals. :P

JMHO
fran



Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: BTgirl on August 05, 2007, 03:19:04 PM
Hi Monkeys!  I've been lurking and reading (doing laundry too).  I think Lorenzo is involved somehow too.  There for a while, I thought maybe he was the one in the Holiday Inn Video sitting next to Natalee instead of Paulus, but I think someone acknowledged it was Paulus.  He may have been the one Paulus called to dispose of the body.   

Hi Jasmine. Welcome!


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 05, 2007, 03:19:04 PM
We were discussing the arm bone that washed ashore in Venezuela early August 2005.  When it was reported, Nancy Grace had a photo from the Venezuela paper she showed on TV.  I emailed that paper and asked them if they would send me the photo (funny thing is I translated my email from English to Spanish in Babelfish and that's how I requested it - I'm sure the people at the paper were cracking up).  Anway, this is a copy of the scanned front page of their paper that they sent to me:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub2/bone0805copy.jpg)

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub2/bone0805.jpg)


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 05, 2007, 03:19:13 PM
Hi Monkeys!  I've been lurking and reading (doing laundry too).  I think Lorenzo is involved somehow too.  There for a while, I thought maybe he was the one in the Holiday Inn Video sitting next to Natalee instead of Paulus, but I think someone acknowledged it was Paulus.  He may have been the one Paulus called to dispose of the body.   

Hi Jasmine... welcome!


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: San on August 05, 2007, 03:20:38 PM
Hi Monkeys!  I've been lurking and reading (doing laundry too).  I think Lorenzo is involved somehow too.  There for a while, I thought maybe he was the one in the Holiday Inn Video sitting next to Natalee instead of Paulus, but I think someone acknowledged it was Paulus.  He may have been the one Paulus called to dispose of the body.   

Welcome jasmine and I agree.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on August 05, 2007, 03:20:40 PM
Hi Monkeys!  I've been lurking and reading (doing laundry too).  I think Lorenzo is involved somehow too.  There for a while, I thought maybe he was the one in the Holiday Inn Video sitting next to Natalee instead of Paulus, but I think someone acknowledged it was Paulus.  He may have been the one Paulus called to dispose of the body.   

Hi Jasmine! Aren't you a cutie!  :wink: That video irritates me to no end. WHY hasn't the entrance/exit video of the man sitting next to Natalee come out? We all saw Nat and Joran come in, so you know it exists!


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 05, 2007, 03:22:23 PM
I think that the arm was a person's...and not at all what they tried to claim...


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: fran on August 05, 2007, 03:23:19 PM
Hi Jasmine!

I'm new too, to posting that is. Been lurking for a couple of years.

 :D

fran


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on August 05, 2007, 03:23:20 PM
Wow, Destiny! I'm impressed! That took "Hutzpah"!!!

Hi Guys! Just left the "you know you're a money when" thread. I highly recommend it for a "Spirit Lift" and great laugh!

Hey CBB... did you read thee whole thing?  LOL... did anyone email LV and explain????

Oh yeah! Added a few of my own, too!  :wink:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 05, 2007, 03:24:30 PM
Also,  Carnut... I agree with you, it's why they keep screaming insurance scam... they use it all the time, IMO


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: San on August 05, 2007, 03:24:57 PM
I think that the arm was a person's...and not at all what they tried to claim...

I agree mrs. red.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on August 05, 2007, 03:26:05 PM
I think that the arm was a person's...and not at all what they tried to claim...

So do I! It's so typical of the case, because no one reliable ever got to test that bone, and where is it now? It probably has a lighthouse belt wrapped around it lying on a bloody mattress stuffed in a pristinely clean Honda!  :2doh:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Destiny on August 05, 2007, 03:26:23 PM
Welcome Jasmine!

Cute Avitar ;-)

Destiny


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 05, 2007, 03:26:45 PM
I think that the arm was a person's...and not at all what they tried to claim...

I agree mrs. red.

as hard as it is to say, I wonder if it's Natalee's?  Also, what ever happened the woman who found evidence on the beach??


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 05, 2007, 03:27:25 PM
I think that the arm was a person's...and not at all what they tried to claim...

So do I! It's so typical of the case, because no one reliable ever got to test that bone, and where is it now? It probably has a lighthouse belt wrapped around it lying on a bloody mattress stuffed in a pristinely clean Honda!  :2doh:

summed up nicely!


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: fran on August 05, 2007, 03:27:29 PM
Hi Monkeys!  I've been lurking and reading (doing laundry too).  I think Lorenzo is involved somehow too.  There for a while, I thought maybe he was the one in the Holiday Inn Video sitting next to Natalee instead of Paulus, but I think someone acknowledged it was Paulus.  He may have been the one Paulus called to dispose of the body.   

Hi Jasmine! Aren't you a cutie!  :wink: That video irritates me to no end. WHY hasn't the entrance/exit video of the man sitting next to Natalee come out? We all saw Nat and Joran come in, so you know it exists!

IIRC, and I could be wrong, but isn't that video from the place Ben King owns? I thought I read, when it was first released, he was pizzed it got out to the media. Wasn't it first revealed on Joran's first U.S. interview?

Anyway, it got dropped like a hot potato by Aruba but it pops back into the  U.S. media once in awhile when brought up by people like Dave, Beth, or JQK.

JMHO
fran


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Carnut on August 05, 2007, 03:28:28 PM
I think the getting Nat to another bar within CnC's was important because that was the process of getting her away from her group and to a more secluded and controlled location so they could provide her with the drugged drink.

And thereafter be able to keep an eye on her and help steer her in the direction the perps intended.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Destiny on August 05, 2007, 03:28:39 PM
Hello Fran! You are nekkid maybe CBB will dress you with an avi...she and Klaas do great avitars.

Destiny


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 05, 2007, 03:30:37 PM
I think the getting Nat to another bar within CnC's was important because that was the process of getting her away from her group and to a more secluded and controlled location so they could provide her with the drugged drink.

And thereafter be able to keep an eye on her and help steer her in the direction the perps intended.

but Car, it's pretty well established, IMO that CnC's was where she was initally drugged... I think they gave her more once they got her away.... and I also think that since he had been pretending to be a guest of the hotel and on spring break himself that she had no idea what she had done...


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on August 05, 2007, 03:31:07 PM
Hello Fran! You are nekkid maybe CBB will dress you with an avi...she and Klaas do great avitars.

Destiny


I'd be happy to help, Fran. Just give me something to go on.  :smt052


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 05, 2007, 03:31:59 PM
I think the getting Nat to another bar within CnC's was important because that was the process of getting her away from her group and to a more secluded and controlled location so they could provide her with the drugged drink.

And thereafter be able to keep an eye on her and help steer her in the direction the perps intended.

but Car, it's pretty well established, IMO that CnC's was where she was initally drugged... I think they gave her more once they got her away.... and I also think that since he had been pretending to be a guest of the hotel and on spring break himself that she had no idea what she had done...

edit... I mean she had no idea that she wasn't going on the way to the hotel.... and if she did scream out of the window... it was to scream help only no one could hear her over the roar of the "loud car"


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Carnut on August 05, 2007, 03:33:05 PM
I think the getting Nat to another bar within CnC's was important because that was the process of getting her away from her group and to a more secluded and controlled location so they could provide her with the drugged drink.

And thereafter be able to keep an eye on her and help steer her in the direction the perps intended.

but Car, it's pretty well established, IMO that CnC's was where she was initally drugged... I think they gave her more once they got her away.... and I also think that since he had been pretending to be a guest of the hotel and on spring break himself that she had no idea what she had done...

Uh, how does that differ from what I said?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on August 05, 2007, 03:33:27 PM
    It was Choose a Name that burned down......I think that MIP6 or Mark Purcell mentioned or worked as a bar tender there.  Or maybe told soneone to come hang out there with him.

Both Choose a Name AND Moomba's had a fire.

Funny how bars tend to have fires, several local bars here have had fires as well.

Seems to be an industry problem.

I suspicion fires tend to provide a source of income to some from insurance when income isn't covering expenses.

When drinking age was 18 in NY, there were many bars that the NJ kids went to....when the age changed to 21 those bars, especially those around lakes & resort areas started to mysteriously burn...one after the other.  You are correct, Carnut....it's also happened in the decades since because the liabilities now involve much more, espcially if minors are served or someone leaves under the influence and hurts someone.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Carnut on August 05, 2007, 03:33:28 PM
I think the getting Nat to another bar within CnC's was important because that was the process of getting her away from her group and to a more secluded and controlled location so they could provide her with the drugged drink.

And thereafter be able to keep an eye on her and help steer her in the direction the perps intended.

but Car, it's pretty well established, IMO that CnC's was where she was initally drugged... I think they gave her more once they got her away.... and I also think that since he had been pretending to be a guest of the hotel and on spring break himself that she had no idea what she had done...

edit... I mean she had no idea that she wasn't going on the way to the hotel.... and if she did scream out of the window... it was to scream help only no one could hear her over the roar of the "loud car"

I agree.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Mere on August 05, 2007, 03:33:43 PM
I think the getting Nat to another bar within CnC's was important because that was the process of getting her away from her group and to a more secluded and controlled location so they could provide her with the drugged drink.

And thereafter be able to keep an eye on her and help steer her in the direction the perps intended.

Wonder why they did not steer her right out the back door to the Kalpoe's car....surely there is a back door to the parking lot....(things I think about).... :-?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 05, 2007, 03:33:49 PM
Hi Monkeys!  I've been lurking and reading (doing laundry too).  I think Lorenzo is involved somehow too.  There for a while, I thought maybe he was the one in the Holiday Inn Video sitting next to Natalee instead of Paulus, but I think someone acknowledged it was Paulus.  He may have been the one Paulus called to dispose of the body.   

Hi Jasmine! Aren't you a cutie!  :wink: That video irritates me to no end. WHY hasn't the entrance/exit video of the man sitting next to Natalee come out? We all saw Nat and Joran come in, so you know it exists!

IIRC, and I could be wrong, but isn't that video from the place Ben King owns? I thought I read, when it was first released, he was pizzed it got out to the media. Wasn't it first revealed on Joran's first U.S. interview?

Anyway, it got dropped like a hot potato by Aruba but it pops back into the  U.S. media once in awhile when brought up by people like Dave, Beth, or JQK.

JMHO
fran

Not Ben King.  It's the casino that Mike Posner owns.  Posner was pissed the video was released to the media.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 05, 2007, 03:34:33 PM
I think the getting Nat to another bar within CnC's was important because that was the process of getting her away from her group and to a more secluded and controlled location so they could provide her with the drugged drink.

And thereafter be able to keep an eye on her and help steer her in the direction the perps intended.

but Car, it's pretty well established, IMO that CnC's was where she was initally drugged... I think they gave her more once they got her away.... and I also think that since he had been pretending to be a guest of the hotel and on spring break himself that she had no idea what she had done...

Uh, how does that differ from what I said?

i missed the word within...


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 05, 2007, 03:34:53 PM
I think the getting Nat to another bar within CnC's was important because that was the process of getting her away from her group and to a more secluded and controlled location so they could provide her with the drugged drink.

And thereafter be able to keep an eye on her and help steer her in the direction the perps intended.

Wonder why they did not steer her right out the back door to the Kalpoe's car....surely there is a back door to the parking lot....(things I think about).... :-?



No - the back door does NOT lead to the parking lot where Deepak's car was.  You have to walk out the front door of CnC and walk all the way to the end of the street then walk back behind the buildings.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: ldstlou on August 05, 2007, 03:36:32 PM
So will there be a court date for Lorenzo, or is this another example of a thug being set free by the Aruban legal system?

Hello all...I am reading backwards so excuse me if this has been asked and answered. I never understood why you all kept talking about Lorenzo except he was rumored to be jorans half brother..then the other day I read the lorenzo thread..wow...now I know why you think he was involved. I missed all those early posts about him.

So 1st question...did anyone ever check old newspaper articles to see if his dad committed suicide...and was it really a "suicide" or a suicide. lol you know what I mean.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 05, 2007, 03:38:36 PM
Need to run to the store, brb


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 05, 2007, 03:38:57 PM
So will there be a court date for Lorenzo, or is this another example of a thug being set free by the Aruban legal system?

Hello all...I am reading backwards so excuse me if this has been asked and answered. I never understood why you all kept talking about Lorenzo except he was rumored to be jorans half brother..then the other day I read the lorenzo thread..wow...now I know why you think he was involved. I missed all those early posts about him.

So 1st question...did anyone ever check old newspaper articles to see if his dad committed suicide...and was it really a "suicide" or a suicide. lol you know what I mean.

well that thought had crossed my mind before... but it could have been a suicide...for real...

so many lies... so little time...


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Observer on August 05, 2007, 03:39:51 PM
I think that the arm was a person's...and not at all what they tried to claim...

I agree mrs. red.

as hard as it is to say, I wonder if it's Natalee's?  Also, what ever happened the woman who found evidence on the beach??

Hi Everyone :)

I wonder if a bone specialist could tell by the photo if that was human or a primate? Also the 2 bones they found in Aruba I would imagine are long gone since they determined those to be donkey bones :(


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on August 05, 2007, 03:41:14 PM
2nj! Honey, you're shrinking! We can't have that! Here you go:

(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/2njbow6.gif)
http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/2njbow6.gif


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: ldstlou on August 05, 2007, 03:44:25 PM
So will there be a court date for Lorenzo, or is this another example of a thug being set free by the Aruban legal system?

Hello all...I am reading backwards so excuse me if this has been asked and answered. I never understood why you all kept talking about Lorenzo except he was rumored to be jorans half brother..then the other day I read the lorenzo thread..wow...now I know why you think he was involved. I missed all those early posts about him.

So 1st question...did anyone ever check old newspaper articles to see if his dad committed suicide...and was it really a "suicide" or a suicide. lol you know what I mean.

well that thought had crossed my mind before... but it could have been a suicide...for real...

so many lies... so little time...

wonder if the aruba b=newspaper archives go back that far...it would probably be about what 5 years back now? I could look them up if someone tells me how. It was said dad used drugs...betcha he was in deep with the bad guys and this would end up another murder victim!!


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 05, 2007, 03:44:34 PM
I think that the arm was a person's...and not at all what they tried to claim...

I agree mrs. red.

as hard as it is to say, I wonder if it's Natalee's?  Also, what ever happened the woman who found evidence on the beach??

Hi Everyone :)

I wonder if a bone specialist could tell by the photo if that was human or a primate? Also the 2 bones they found in Aruba I would imagine are long gone since they determined those to be donkey bones :(

that's right ... the bones the woman found were donkey bones... so is the "paradise" littered with bones of poor animals... and why would I want to vacation amoung that...

and *******, good to see you... been wondering where you got off to!


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on August 05, 2007, 03:45:07 PM
Need to run to the store, brb

I don't know why she bothers to post her store runs. She's back before the post hits the screen!  :lol:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: ldstlou on August 05, 2007, 03:45:31 PM
I think that the arm was a person's...and not at all what they tried to claim...

I agree mrs. red.

as hard as it is to say, I wonder if it's Natalee's?  Also, what ever happened the woman who found evidence on the beach??

Hi Everyone :)

I wonder if a bone specialist could tell by the photo if that was human or a primate? Also the 2 bones they found in Aruba I would imagine are long gone since they determined those to be donkey bones :(
two great minds!! lol i was thinking the same thing!!


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Mere on August 05, 2007, 03:45:33 PM
I think the getting Nat to another bar within CnC's was important because that was the process of getting her away from her group and to a more secluded and controlled location so they could provide her with the drugged drink.

And thereafter be able to keep an eye on her and help steer her in the direction the perps intended.

Wonder why they did not steer her right out the back door to the Kalpoe's car....surely there is a back door to the parking lot....(things I think about).... :-?



No - the back door does NOT lead to the parking lot where Deepak's car was.  You have to walk out the front door of CnC and walk all the way to the end of the street then walk back behind the buildings.

Thanks Klaas....I should never assume that there is a back door to a bar in Aruba...I was working on most buildings I have visited....so....they were taking a big risk....knowing that they would have to get her out the front door to a car...no matter where it was located. 

Normally it seems that pimps would take a girl from a smaller group....but these were big risk takers with big egos...or maybe they were just stupid.... :shock:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: fran on August 05, 2007, 03:45:43 PM
Hello Fran! You are nekkid maybe CBB will dress you with an avi...she and Klaas do great avitars.

Destiny


I'd be happy to help, Fran. Just give me something to go on.  :smt052

Since Destiny doesn't like nekkid monkeys, perhaps I should put something on. :lol:

No offense to monkeys, I luv 'em, really :), but we just got a 4 wk old little black and white kitty. Something along that line would be nice. :wink:

Thanks,
fran


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 05, 2007, 03:46:34 PM
Need to run to the store, brb

I don't know why she bothers to post her store runs. She's back before the post hits the screen!  :lol:

it's true...

Ldstlou... I don't even begin to know how to do that..


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on August 05, 2007, 03:46:37 PM
Does it seem strange to anyone that a wild donkey would go for a swim in the ocean and drown?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Observer on August 05, 2007, 03:46:58 PM
So will there be a court date for Lorenzo, or is this another example of a thug being set free by the Aruban legal system?

Hello all...I am reading backwards so excuse me if this has been asked and answered. I never understood why you all kept talking about Lorenzo except he was rumored to be jorans half brother..then the other day I read the lorenzo thread..wow...now I know why you think he was involved. I missed all those early posts about him.

So 1st question...did anyone ever check old newspaper articles to see if his dad committed suicide...and was it really a "suicide" or a suicide. lol you know what I mean.

well that thought had crossed my mind before... but it could have been a suicide...for real...

so many lies... so little time...

I looked for old newspapers and they are not available online. I had asked two Arubans why they thought he killed himself and they said it was a mystery. The rumor is drug abuse..But he is listed as dying on 12/21/01.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 05, 2007, 03:46:59 PM
I think the getting Nat to another bar within CnC's was important because that was the process of getting her away from her group and to a more secluded and controlled location so they could provide her with the drugged drink.

And thereafter be able to keep an eye on her and help steer her in the direction the perps intended.

Wonder why they did not steer her right out the back door to the Kalpoe's car....surely there is a back door to the parking lot....(things I think about).... :-?
Hi Mere
I always thought that was exactly what they did,steer her out the back door.Does anyone have a pic of the 2 bars and how far apart they are in C&C's?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: ldstlou on August 05, 2007, 03:47:37 PM
Need to run to the store, brb

I don't know why she bothers to post her store runs. She's back before the post hits the screen!  :lol:

it's true...

Ldstlou... I don't even begin to know how to do that..

we'll have to wait for klaas..lol...wonder if Jossy could look it up?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 05, 2007, 03:48:23 PM
I think the getting Nat to another bar within CnC's was important because that was the process of getting her away from her group and to a more secluded and controlled location so they could provide her with the drugged drink.

And thereafter be able to keep an eye on her and help steer her in the direction the perps intended.

Wonder why they did not steer her right out the back door to the Kalpoe's car....surely there is a back door to the parking lot....(things I think about).... :-?



No - the back door does NOT lead to the parking lot where Deepak's car was.  You have to walk out the front door of CnC and walk all the way to the end of the street then walk back behind the buildings.
Aahh,where does the back door lead to?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on August 05, 2007, 03:48:41 PM
Hello Fran! You are nekkid maybe CBB will dress you with an avi...she and Klaas do great avitars.

Destiny


I'd be happy to help, Fran. Just give me something to go on.  :smt052

Since Destiny doesn't like nekkid monkeys, perhaps I should put something on. :lol:

No offense to monkeys, I luv 'em, really :), but we just got a 4 wk old little black and white kitty. Something along that line would be nice. :wink:

Thanks,
fran

We like ALL monkeys and you don't have to wear a thing, but I'll find you something and you can choose to get dressed or not. How's that? It's the Welcome Wagon gift.  :wink: BRB


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: ldstlou on August 05, 2007, 03:49:03 PM
So will there be a court date for Lorenzo, or is this another example of a thug being set free by the Aruban legal system?

Hello all...I am reading backwards so excuse me if this has been asked and answered. I never understood why you all kept talking about Lorenzo except he was rumored to be jorans half brother..then the other day I read the lorenzo thread..wow...now I know why you think he was involved. I missed all those early posts about him.

So 1st question...did anyone ever check old newspaper articles to see if his dad committed suicide...and was it really a "suicide" or a suicide. lol you know what I mean.

well that thought had crossed my mind before... but it could have been a suicide...for real...

so many lies... so little time...

I looked for old newspapers and they are not available online. I had asked two Arubans why they thought he killed himself and they said it was a mystery. The rumor is drug abuse..But he is listed as dying on 12/21/01.

you is good!! lol  well...history says..if you're found hanging from a rope somewhere...probably a murder!!


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 05, 2007, 03:49:10 PM
Does it seem strange to anyone that a wild donkey would go for a swim in the ocean and drown?

it did me.... or actually, if there are that many dead animals around why would I want to hang out there for a vacation...


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: jasmine on August 05, 2007, 03:51:12 PM
Does it seem strange to anyone that a wild donkey would go for a swim in the ocean and drown?

Sure seems strange to me.  And I agree that the bone that was found in Venezuela sure looks human to me too. 


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 05, 2007, 03:51:20 PM
BBL... carry on Monkeys...

keep the faith...

btw, a lot of good questions being discussed, going to ponder them.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: fran on August 05, 2007, 03:52:08 PM
Not Ben King.  It's the casino that Mike Posner owns.  Posner was pissed the video was released to the media.

Thanks Klaas..........but, I thought Posner is King? Or is that someone else? Wasn't there some type of name change because of legal trouble or am I just totally confused on that issue? :2doh:

fran


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Observer on August 05, 2007, 03:52:15 PM

as hard as it is to say, I wonder if it's Natalee's?  Also, what ever happened the woman who found evidence on the beach??
[/quote]

Hi Everyone :)

I wonder if a bone specialist could tell by the photo if that was human or a primate? Also the 2 bones they found in Aruba I would imagine are long gone since they determined those to be donkey bones :(
[/quote]

that's right ... the bones the woman found were donkey bones... so is the "paradise" littered with bones of poor animals... and why would I want to vacation amoung that...

and *******, good to see you... been wondering where you got off to!
[/quote]

Hi Mrs.Red..Good to see you too.. :2waver: This computer room has no AC so I over heat quickly in here..Luckily today its 10 degrees cooler :2rofl:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: NYC_lover on August 05, 2007, 03:52:47 PM
Hi Mrs. Red,

good to see u, I have send the email again, just few minutes ago.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 05, 2007, 03:54:35 PM
Does it seem strange to anyone that a wild donkey would go for a swim in the ocean and drown?
LOL....I was just thinking the same thing.Wasn't 2 sets of bones found?One(or 2)by a male tourist and one(or 2)by a female tourist....the one who got a hold of Tim Miller?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Destiny on August 05, 2007, 03:56:03 PM
I think the getting Nat to another bar within CnC's was important because that was the process of getting her away from her group and to a more secluded and controlled location so they could provide her with the drugged drink.

And thereafter be able to keep an eye on her and help steer her in the direction the perps intended.

Wonder why they did not steer her right out the back door to the Kalpoe's car....surely there is a back door to the parking lot....(things I think about).... :-?



No - the back door does NOT lead to the parking lot where Deepak's car was.  You have to walk out the front door of CnC and walk all the way to the end of the street then walk back behind the buildings.

Thanks Klaas....I should never assume that there is a back door to a bar in Aruba...I was working on most buildings I have visited....so....they were taking a big risk....knowing that they would have to get her out the front door to a car...no matter where it was located. 

Normally it seems that pimps would take a girl from a smaller group....but these were big risk takers with big egos...or maybe they were just stupid.... :shock:

My personal *feelings* are that Nat was *chosen* days b4 the final night.  I think Paulus decided whom to seperate from the flock.

Destiny


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Observer on August 05, 2007, 03:56:14 PM
Not Ben King.  It's the casino that Mike Posner owns.  Posner was pissed the video was released to the media.

Thanks Klaas..........but, I thought Posner is King? Or is that someone else? Wasn't there some type of name change because of legal trouble or am I just totally confused on that issue? :2doh:

fran

Ben Vocking changes his name to Ben King and Years ago Irv Goldstein changed his name to Mike Posner..Not sure why he changed his name to posner since there are already wealthy posner's on the island.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on August 05, 2007, 03:56:18 PM
2nj! Honey, you're shrinking! We can't have that! Here you go:

(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/2njbow6.gif)
http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/2njbow6.gif

Thanks, CBB
...I noticed that, yesterday.  Oldfart observed that the scroll bar for some of us had disappeared.  Figured Dugga may have been tooling around behind the curtain, ya know? 


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Observer on August 05, 2007, 04:00:09 PM
Quote from: ldstlou link=topic=1972.msg263126#msg263126 date=
[/quote

Hello all...I am reading backwards so excuse me if this has been asked and answered. I never understood why you all kept talking about Lorenzo except he was rumored to be jorans half brother..then the other day I read the lorenzo thread..wow...now I know why you think he was involved. I missed all those early posts about him.

So 1st question...did anyone ever check old newspaper articles to see if his dad committed suicide...and was it really a "suicide" or a suicide. lol you know what I mean.

well that thought had crossed my mind before... but it could have been a suicide...for real...

so many lies... so little time...
[/quote]

I looked for old newspapers and they are not available online. I had asked two Arubans why they thought he killed himself and they said it was a mystery. The rumor is drug abuse..But he is listed as dying on 12/21/01.
[/quote]

you is good!! lol  well...history says..if you're found hanging from a rope somewhere...probably a murder!!
[/quote]

Just in the last year Aruba has had several hangings..The last two it is quite clear that they both had one hand in there pocket. I will also never forget about the reporter who was found hung over a wall with bedsheets over her. :-?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 05, 2007, 04:02:50 PM
Need to run to the store, brb

I don't know why she bothers to post her store runs. She's back before the post hits the screen!  :lol:
Yep, back now  :lol:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Observer on August 05, 2007, 04:03:37 PM
Does it seem strange to anyone that a wild donkey would go for a swim in the ocean and drown?
LOL....I was just thinking the same thing.Wasn't 2 sets of bones found?One(or 2)by a male tourist and one(or 2)by a female tourist....the one who got a hold of Tim Miller?

Yes..At least two bones were found in the water in Aruba..One of them had a horrible smell of wrotting meat.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: fran on August 05, 2007, 04:06:55 PM
Not Ben King.  It's the casino that Mike Posner owns.  Posner was pissed the video was released to the media.

Thanks Klaas..........but, I thought Posner is King? Or is that someone else? Wasn't there some type of name change because of legal trouble or am I just totally confused on that issue? :2doh:

fran

Ben Vocking changes his name to Ben King and Years ago Irv Goldstein changed his name to Mike Posner..Not sure why he changed his name to posner since there are already wealthy posner's on the island.

Thanks *******

I guess I got confused on who changed their name to what.

fran


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 05, 2007, 04:07:52 PM
Fran - how is this kitty?  I'm sure CBB is working on something much fancier though  :lol:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub2/FranKitten.gif)

http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub2/FranKitten.gif


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: San on August 05, 2007, 04:09:16 PM
I think the getting Nat to another bar within CnC's was important because that was the process of getting her away from her group and to a more secluded and controlled location so they could provide her with the drugged drink.

And thereafter be able to keep an eye on her and help steer her in the direction the perps intended.

but Car, it's pretty well established, IMO that CnC's was where she was initally drugged... I think they gave her more once they got her away.... and I also think that since he had been pretending to be a guest of the hotel and on spring break himself that she had no idea what she had done...

edit... I mean she had no idea that she wasn't going on the way to the hotel.... and if she did scream out of the window... it was to scream help only no one could hear her over the roar of the "loud car"

Also in one of the statements Deepak said he had the volume on his radio turn up loud.  It was to hide the fact that Natalee was screaming.  JMO.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Rammstein on August 05, 2007, 04:13:08 PM
I think the getting Nat to another bar within CnC's was important because that was the process of getting her away from her group and to a more secluded and controlled location so they could provide her with the drugged drink.

And thereafter be able to keep an eye on her and help steer her in the direction the perps intended.

but Car, it's pretty well established, IMO that CnC's was where she was initally drugged... I think they gave her more once they got her away.... and I also think that since he had been pretending to be a guest of the hotel and on spring break himself that she had no idea what she had done...

edit... I mean she had no idea that she wasn't going on the way to the hotel.... and if she did scream out of the window... it was to scream help only no one could hear her over the roar of the "loud car"

Also in one of the statements Deepak said he had the volume on his radio turn up loud.  It was to hide the fact that Natalee was screaming.  JMO.

if she screamed (don't know but it could be possible) then there would be no-one to hear it. After they cleared the hotel sector and drove up North I doubt there will have been anybody around to hear screams to begin with. They said (if I am not mistaken) that they saw a few cars at the lighthouse but not much else in the way of cars or people.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Carnut on August 05, 2007, 04:19:08 PM
Welcome to the forum Rammstein

Looks like your first post.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 05, 2007, 04:19:35 PM
Ramm - exactly.  Wasn't it in one of Deepak's PV's that he spoke of the porn video near the La Cabana and that Natalee had "had enough" and to turn it off?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 05, 2007, 04:20:55 PM
Welcome to the forum Rammstein

Looks like your first post.

Yes, first forum post but has been a member of the forum for over a year and posts often on the front page of SM.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Auntiem on August 05, 2007, 04:21:05 PM
I think the getting Nat to another bar within CnC's was important because that was the process of getting her away from her group and to a more secluded and controlled location so they could provide her with the drugged drink.

And thereafter be able to keep an eye on her and help steer her in the direction the perps intended.







     Do you think they realy had to get her to a secluded part of C&C to drug her??  I believe all or most of the bartenders there had the "tourist bottles" ready to drug anybody when asked by a so-called VIP.  I believe this was done to Natalee in Plain Sight, in front of all unsuspecting friends, and unsuspecting Natalee, and she went willingly, out the front door with everyone else, accepting a "cab" ride from another "vacationing student", back to their hotel.
She was a young, innocent girl, her faculties clouded from the alcohol and the drug most likely beginning to take effect, and maybe feeling a little daring doing something really innocent, hopping a cab ride from a "foreign college'' student!!







Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Observer on August 05, 2007, 04:22:55 PM
I think it's a good idea if we can send that picture off to someone who can distinguish between a human and a monkey arm bone..Anyone know what that specialists would be called? Anyone have any ideas? Would be nice to put this to rest once and for all.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: San on August 05, 2007, 04:25:01 PM
I think the getting Nat to another bar within CnC's was important because that was the process of getting her away from her group and to a more secluded and controlled location so they could provide her with the drugged drink.

And thereafter be able to keep an eye on her and help steer her in the direction the perps intended.

but Car, it's pretty well established, IMO that CnC's was where she was initally drugged... I think they gave her more once they got her away.... and I also think that since he had been pretending to be a guest of the hotel and on spring break himself that she had no idea what she had done...

edit... I mean she had no idea that she wasn't going on the way to the hotel.... and if she did scream out of the window... it was to scream help only no one could hear her over the roar of the "loud car"

Also in one of the statements Deepak said he had the volume on his radio turn up loud.  It was to hide the fact that Natalee was screaming.  JMO.

if she screamed (don't know but it could be possible) then there would be no-one to hear it. After they cleared the hotel sector and drove up North I doubt there will have been anybody around to hear screams to begin with. They said (if I am not mistaken) that they saw a few cars at the lighthouse but not much else in the way of cars or people.

We don't know the exact point she started to scream.  If we are going by the Deepak email he said she screamed something out the window (wahoo Aruba or something like that).  I believe he said this just in case someone did hear her scream.  In my opinion she screamed.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on August 05, 2007, 04:25:11 PM
Fran:

(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/kitty9.gif)
http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/kitty9.gif

How's this?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 05, 2007, 04:25:56 PM
I think it's a good idea if we can send that picture off to someone who can distinguish between a human and a monkey arm bone..Anyone know what that specialists would be called? Anyone have any ideas? Would be nice to put this to rest once and for all.

You would think that the FBI already has the picture.  It was sent to the family back in August 2005.  I'm sure they have experts in the field.  The problem is the bone was found in Venezuela and probably no way to get in from them back then.  I imagine it's long gone by now.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Auntiem on August 05, 2007, 04:27:57 PM
    Well wasn't there some nonsense about her yelling to her friend "Aruba..WOOO             HOOO.."   and Deepak stopping and telling her to get out of the car and go with her friends.   Wasn't this crap in that movie???


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 05, 2007, 04:30:03 PM
   Well wasn't there some nonsense about her yelling to her friend "Aruba..WOOO             HOOO.."   and Deepak stopping and telling her to get out of the car and go with her friends.   Wasn't this crap in that movie???


Something like that, yes.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 05, 2007, 04:31:28 PM
   Well wasn't there some nonsense about her yelling to her friend "Aruba..WOOO             HOOO.."   and Deepak stopping and telling her to get out of the car and go with her friends.   Wasn't this crap in that movie???


Hey Ramm... welcome!

I think they had to say that she yelled because she did.. only it wasn't woo hoo aruba or anything like that....


NYLover I am still not getting anything in my emails...


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Carnut on August 05, 2007, 04:31:34 PM
    Well wasn't there some nonsense about her yelling to her friend "Aruba..WOOO             HOOO.."   and Deepak stopping and telling her to get out of the car and go with her friends.   Wasn't this crap in that movie???


Obviously just trying to cover in case anyone heard her screaming.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Auntiem on August 05, 2007, 04:32:12 PM
  Deepak said he went aroun the block 2 or 3 times but when he saw the police he went another way, while he was circling the block he may have passed her friends, and maybe she tried to tell them that he was an Aruban....not a tourist.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 05, 2007, 04:33:50 PM
 Deepak said he went aroun the block 2 or 3 times but when he saw the police he went another way, while he was circling the block he may have passed her friends, and maybe she tried to tell them that he was an Aruban....not a tourist.

IF Natalee yelled out the window at that point, I suspect she was yelling for help.  Did Deepak drive around waiting for the drugs to take affect?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 05, 2007, 04:34:35 PM
I think that they drove around to make sure that the drug took effect...


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: MuffyBee on August 05, 2007, 04:36:03 PM
I think that they drove around to make sure that the drug took effect...

I agree with you Mrs. Red


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Destiny on August 05, 2007, 04:36:23 PM
Fran:

(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/kitty9.gif)
http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/kitty9.gif

How's this?

CBB....how cute!  Looks like Kitty is saying *No way Joran, don't buy that lie either*

Dest


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Auntiem on August 05, 2007, 04:37:12 PM
  That's what I meant, even in her stat she was trying to get help.  When a person is drugged, of course a cry for help would come out in a strange way.  She could even have yelled Woo Hoo...to yell, get their attention....in her condition that may have been the only possible way


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Destiny on August 05, 2007, 04:37:55 PM
Welcome Ram!

Destiny


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Kermit on August 05, 2007, 04:38:51 PM
I think the getting Nat to another bar within CnC's was important because that was the process of getting her away from her group and to a more secluded and controlled location so they could provide her with the drugged drink.

And thereafter be able to keep an eye on her and help steer her in the direction the perps intended.

Wonder why they did not steer her right out the back door to the Kalpoe's car....surely there is a back door to the parking lot....(things I think about).... :-?



No - the back door does NOT lead to the parking lot where Deepak's car was.  You have to walk out the front door of CnC and walk all the way to the end of the street then walk back behind the buildings.


(http://img46.imageshack.us/img46/9821/carlosmapwly8.jpg)


(http://img46.imageshack.us/img46/2005/carlosncharliesparkingbj4.jpg)



Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 05, 2007, 04:40:40 PM
I still say we need to take all the interviews, and the statements and line them up.... because somewhere in the lies there is the truth....

notice the sequence of the lies....

and someone saw something that made it necessary for the lies to continue evolving...

notice the mention of the house... that little fact goes in as what??? who or what made that little lie necessary???


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: fran on August 05, 2007, 04:41:22 PM
Klaasend and CBB :2doh:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Rammstein on August 05, 2007, 04:42:47 PM
    Well wasn't there some nonsense about her yelling to her friend "Aruba..WOOO             HOOO.."   and Deepak stopping and telling her to get out of the car and go with her friends.   Wasn't this crap in that movie???


Hey Ramm... welcome!

I think they had to say that she yelled because she did.. only it wasn't woo hoo aruba or anything like that....


NYLover I am still not getting anything in my emails...

from what I remember she had a small discussion with the kids of her class after the "whoo hoo" thingy and that they warned her to come out. If at some point there had been need to scream then it happened after that moment when they drove away from Natalee's classmates.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 05, 2007, 04:43:20 PM
Does it seem strange to anyone that a wild donkey would go for a swim in the ocean and drown?
LOL....I was just thinking the same thing.Wasn't 2 sets of bones found?One(or 2)by a male tourist and one(or 2)by a female tourist....the one who got a hold of Tim Miller?

Yes..At least two bones were found in the water in Aruba..One of them had a horrible smell of wrotting meat.
Right!
And when Tim and the lady who found a bone(s)went to the polis station to find out about the bone they polis person at the desk said something about"Oh,you mean the boneS?".I wonder what happened with that.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 05, 2007, 04:43:32 PM
NEW FRONT PAGE POST:

Tim Miller of Texas EquuSearch Takes part in The 21st Annual Meeting of Parents of Murdered Children



http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/2007/08/05/tim-miller-of-texas-equusearch-takes-part-in-the-21st-annual-meeting-of-parents-of-murdered-children/


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: fran on August 05, 2007, 04:43:40 PM
Klaasend and CBB :2doh:

I don't know how I messed that up. I wrote a post.  :2doh:

I like both kitties. But since I have a baby, I'd like to go with the little face. I hope I don't offend anyone after you went to so much trouble.

Thank you both for your trouble!
fran

PS

ehhhh........how do I put it in?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Observer on August 05, 2007, 04:44:15 PM
I think it's a good idea if we can send that picture off to someone who can distinguish between a human and a monkey arm bone..Anyone know what that specialists would be called? Anyone have any ideas? Would be nice to put this to rest once and for all.

You would think that the FBI already has the picture.  It was sent to the family back in August 2005.  I'm sure they have experts in the field.  The problem is the bone was found in Venezuela and probably no way to get in from them back then.  I imagine it's long gone by now.

Your right and even if they determined that to be human they would have to test it to see if it was Natalee. That should have been done two years ago. I thought someone saw a ring on that hand so that makes me curious.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: NYC_lover on August 05, 2007, 04:45:21 PM


NYLover I am still not getting anything in my emails...

I have send the email again, to the address want Klaasend have gived me.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 05, 2007, 04:46:06 PM
Klaasend and CBB :2doh:

I don't know how I messed that up. I wrote a post.  :2doh:

I like both kitties. But since I have a baby, I'd like to go with the little face. I hope I don't offend anyone after you went to so much trouble.

Thank you both for your trouble!
fran

PS

ehhhh........how do I put it in?

You can copy the link and just paste it in your profile.  There's a place to past a url for an avatar.  OR, you can save it to your PC as a .gif and upload it from your PC.  OR - I can do it for you, lol  :lol:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: GrannyToad on August 05, 2007, 04:47:20 PM
I think it's a good idea if we can send that picture off to someone who can distinguish between a human and a monkey arm bone..Anyone know what that specialists would be called? Anyone have any ideas? Would be nice to put this to rest once and for all.

aahhhh anthropology would do. Or a primatologist.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 05, 2007, 04:48:33 PM
    Well wasn't there some nonsense about her yelling to her friend "Aruba..WOOO             HOOO.."   and Deepak stopping and telling her to get out of the car and go with her friends.   Wasn't this crap in that movie???


Hey Ramm... welcome!

I think they had to say that she yelled because she did.. only it wasn't woo hoo aruba or anything like that....


NYLover I am still not getting anything in my emails...

from what I remember she had a small discussion with the kids of her class after the "whoo hoo" thingy and that they warned her to come out. If at some point there had been need to scream then it happened after that moment when they drove away from Natalee's classmates.

and could that need to scream be that she at that point realized that there was harm to her in the equation?  She by joran's own statments, thought he was staying at the holiday inn.... so is then when they decided they were going to joran's home or whatever?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Auntiem on August 05, 2007, 04:48:50 PM
    You know what I am sitting here thinking,  how did they know Natalee would go willingly????  Did her friends ask her if she was ok? Did she really tell them she would catch up to them later?  Did she walk on her on volition into that car??

       I know this sounds stupid....but think about it.  How did these jerks KNOW they could do this so easily....in plain site??


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on August 05, 2007, 04:48:52 PM
I've got to run. Fran, Klaas: Love the kitty face! You're in great hands with Klaas, Fran! She'll get you dressed as fast as she runs! See Ya'll later!  :smt039


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: fran on August 05, 2007, 04:49:29 PM

You can copy the link and just paste it in your profile.  There's a place to past a url for an avatar.  OR, you can save it to your PC as a .gif and upload it from your PC.  OR - I can do it for you, lol  :lol:

I'd appreciate it if you could do it for me Klaasend. I'm computer challenged. :)
The baby kitty, if you don't mind.

Thank you very much,
fran


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Carnut on August 05, 2007, 04:50:17 PM
    Well wasn't there some nonsense about her yelling to her friend "Aruba..WOOO             HOOO.."   and Deepak stopping and telling her to get out of the car and go with her friends.   Wasn't this crap in that movie???


Hey Ramm... welcome!

I think they had to say that she yelled because she did.. only it wasn't woo hoo aruba or anything like that....


NYLover I am still not getting anything in my emails...

from what I remember she had a small discussion with the kids of her class after the "whoo hoo" thingy and that they warned her to come out. If at some point there had been need to scream then it happened after that moment when they drove away from Natalee's classmates.

Don't think any kids in her class has said they saw her in the car and asked her to get out.

Think that was a misslead from the reenaction show.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 05, 2007, 04:50:42 PM
see you later CBB!!


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: fran on August 05, 2007, 04:51:01 PM
   You know what I am sitting here thinking,  how did they know Natalee would go willingly????  Did her friends ask her if she was ok? Did she really tell them she would catch up to them later?  Did she walk on her on volition into that car??

       I know this sounds stupid....but think about it.  How did these jerks KNOW they could do this so easily....in plain site??


They'd done it twenty times before.  :-x

fran


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: San on August 05, 2007, 04:51:33 PM
   Well wasn't there some nonsense about her yelling to her friend "Aruba..WOOO             HOOO.."   and Deepak stopping and telling her to get out of the car and go with her friends.   Wasn't this crap in that movie???


Hey Ramm... welcome!

I think they had to say that she yelled because she did.. only it wasn't woo hoo aruba or anything like that....


NYLover I am still not getting anything in my emails...
I agree and I also think this is where the struggle started and it ended at the Sloot home.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: fran on August 05, 2007, 04:51:50 PM
I've got to run. Fran, Klaas: Love the kitty face! You're in great hands with Klaas, Fran! She'll get you dressed as fast as she runs! See Ya'll later!  :smt039

Bye CBB, and thank you!

fran


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 05, 2007, 04:52:06 PM
I believe it was Dash who said something about the woo hoo thing.  Then after speaking with all the kids, nobody really remembered Natalee yelling out the car window.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Observer on August 05, 2007, 04:53:04 PM
Does it seem strange to anyone that a wild donkey would go for a swim in the ocean and drown?
LOL....I was just thinking the same thing.Wasn't 2 sets of bones found?One(or 2)by a male tourist and one(or 2)by a female tourist....the one who got a hold of Tim Miller?

Yes..At least two bones were found in the water in Aruba..One of them had a horrible smell of wrotting meat.
Right!
And when Tim and the lady who found a bone(s)went to the polis station to find out about the bone they polis person at the desk said something about"Oh,you mean the boneS?".I wonder what happened with that.


No idea..That is the last I think any of us have heard.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: fran on August 05, 2007, 04:53:06 PM
That was fast! Wow Klaas, Thanks bunches.

fran :D


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Carnut on August 05, 2007, 04:55:32 PM
I think the open window and shouting thing was mentioned in the PV's to cover just in case the cop that Deepak saw may have witnessed something as they drove by.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Auntiem on August 05, 2007, 04:56:37 PM
    Mrs. Red, I do believe, that was a cry from an impaired Natalee,....crying for help in the only way possible in her condition.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 05, 2007, 04:56:41 PM
I believe it was Dash who said something about the woo hoo thing.  Then after speaking with all the kids, nobody really remembered Natalee yelling out the car window.

so maybe Dash thought she was yelling woo hoo...and she was screaming something else? 

I do believe that she was drugged at CnC's because prior to going she was able to dance and on the higher stage/dancefloor... if she had been as drunk as they tried to claim... doing drugs etc she wouldn't have been able to dance... not if she couldn't walk...

and why does joran's statments as tamikosmom posted the other day... one time he says she is drunk and can't walk... and other times she is an out of control drunken wild child...


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 05, 2007, 04:56:56 PM
I think that they drove around to make sure that the drug took effect...
But why would that matter at that point?They already had her in the car with the music blasting.Makes no sense to me why Deepak would drive around the block a couple of times....if he did.If he did,maybe that was the signal to someone?Like"IF you get your victim in the car,drive around such and such block 2 times".


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 05, 2007, 04:58:32 PM
I believe it was Dash who said something about the woo hoo thing.  Then after speaking with all the kids, nobody really remembered Natalee yelling out the car window.

so maybe Dash thought she was yelling woo hoo...and she was screaming something else? 

I do believe that she was drugged at CnC's because prior to going she was able to dance and on the higher stage/dancefloor... if she had been as drunk as they tried to claim... doing drugs etc she wouldn't have been able to dance... not if she couldn't walk...

and why does joran's statments as tamikosmom posted the other day... one time he says she is drunk and can't walk... and other times she is an out of control drunken wild child...
   I need to preview... edit... and the other times she is jsut fine and not drunk at all...


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: fran on August 05, 2007, 04:58:59 PM
I think the open window and shouting thing was mentioned in the PV's to cover just in case the cop that Deepak saw may have witnessed something as they drove by.

We must remember, there's always truth mixed in with the lies and there's a reason they put each and every detail into the story. Also, a perp often times explains something, BEFORE they're asked. :-|

JMHO
fran


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 05, 2007, 04:59:04 PM
 That's what I meant, even in her stat she was trying to get help.  When a person is drugged, of course a cry for help would come out in a strange way.  She could even have yelled Woo Hoo...to yell, get their attention....in her condition that may have been the only possible way
I think if Natalee would have been able to yell out anything it would have been the universal HELP.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 05, 2007, 04:59:37 PM
I think that they drove around to make sure that the drug took effect...
But why would that matter at that point?They already had her in the car with the music blasting.Makes no sense to me why Deepak would drive around the block a couple of times....if he did.If he did,maybe that was the signal to someone?Like"IF you get your victim in the car,drive around such and such block 2 times".

maybe to stay in proximity to where they could get more if the first dose wasn't enough??


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Observer on August 05, 2007, 04:59:50 PM
I think it's a good idea if we can send that picture off to someone who can distinguish between a human and a monkey arm bone..Anyone know what that specialists would be called? Anyone have any ideas? Would be nice to put this to rest once and for all.

aahhhh anthropology would do. Or a primatologist.

Ok..Thanks..I think I will send the pic just to get a answer for our own curiosities. Unfortunaltely we dont have pics of the bones found in Aruba to determine if they were indeed donkey bones. :-?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Kermit on August 05, 2007, 05:01:46 PM
Different witnesses. The witness who saw her get in the car was not the one who saw Deepak leading her out. The witness saw them turn a corner into a small street or alleyway. Some have suggested this is the path to the parking lot, but this witness does not know if it is or isn't.

The situation also begs the question, Did she get in the car on two different occasions? If, as Newswatcher wondered, she was in the car, asked to stop to use the restroom, and then willingly led back to the car, there could be two different witnesses sightings -- or just of one, not knowing of the other. Although... If that happened, wouldn't Deepak have dropped her off in front of the bar, having already been on the road?

So many questions. {:-(

Posted by: arbeej | Nov 1, 2005 12:31:24 PM

(http://img46.imageshack.us/img46/9821/carlosmapwly8.jpg)


(http://img46.imageshack.us/img46/2005/carlosncharliesparkingbj4.jpg)


[/quote]


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 05, 2007, 05:01:54 PM
I think the getting Nat to another bar within CnC's was important because that was the process of getting her away from her group and to a more secluded and controlled location so they could provide her with the drugged drink.

And thereafter be able to keep an eye on her and help steer her in the direction the perps intended.

Wonder why they did not steer her right out the back door to the Kalpoe's car....surely there is a back door to the parking lot....(things I think about).... :-?



No - the back door does NOT lead to the parking lot where Deepak's car was.  You have to walk out the front door of CnC and walk all the way to the end of the street then walk back behind the buildings.


(http://img46.imageshack.us/img46/9821/carlosmapwly8.jpg)


(http://img46.imageshack.us/img46/2005/carlosncharliesparkingbj4.jpg)


Hi Kermit
I'm confused....is this the front of C&C's?If so,the back door is really not a back door?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 05, 2007, 05:02:51 PM
Here is a couple of Dash's posts regarding Natalee yelling out the window.  I'm still looking for more:

Jun 14, 2005 10:43 pm:  (Responding to this question, "I read that Natalee rolled down the window and shouted as she drove off with the three guys. Are there any thoughts that, in hindsight, that she was shouting for help?") She wasn't shouting for help, I think she honestly thought they were taking her back to the hotel


Jun 15, 2005 12:02 am:  (Responding to question, "Dash [codename for Alana], can you confirm where she was in the car when she yelled out to you and the others?")  I didn't see her in the car... she must have got in right after she talked to me. I would assume if she yelled then she would have had to be in the backseat, because the car would have been on the right of the sidewalk 



Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 05, 2007, 05:03:09 PM
I think the open window and shouting thing was mentioned in the PV's to cover just in case the cop that Deepak saw may have witnessed something as they drove by.

We must remember, there's always truth mixed in with the lies and there's a reason they put each and every detail into the story. Also, a perp often times explains something, BEFORE they're asked. :-|

JMHO
fran

that is why I keep saying if we put all the interviews over each other like a transparency, we would find more of the truth...


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Auntiem on August 05, 2007, 05:03:21 PM
I think that they drove around to make sure that the drug took effect...
But why would that matter at that point?They already had her in the car with the music blasting.Makes no sense to me why Deepak would drive around the block a couple of times....if he did.If he did,maybe that was the signal to someone?Like"IF you get your victim in the car,drive around such and such block 2 times".










I agree....I didn't get why people were saying they were driving around the block til the drugs kicked in, seems like that would be the last thing they would do, unless, as you said it was as a signal..  You would think once they had her in the car and drugged they would want to get away, and fast.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 05, 2007, 05:06:39 PM
    Well wasn't there some nonsense about her yelling to her friend "Aruba..WOOO             HOOO.."   and Deepak stopping and telling her to get out of the car and go with her friends.   Wasn't this crap in that movie???


Hey Ramm... welcome!

I think they had to say that she yelled because she did.. only it wasn't woo hoo aruba or anything like that....


NYLover I am still not getting anything in my emails...

from what I remember she had a small discussion with the kids of her class after the "whoo hoo" thingy and that they warned her to come out. If at some point there had been need to scream then it happened after that moment when they drove away from Natalee's classmates.
Hi Ramm
Deepak stated that as he drove by some of the MB kids,one MB guy came up to the car and told Natalee to get out,Natalee told him no,that they would bring her back to her hotel.I don't know IF that was ever confirmed by any of the MB kids tho.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: GrannyToad on August 05, 2007, 05:07:47 PM
   You know what I am sitting here thinking,  how did they know Natalee would go willingly????  Did her friends ask her if she was ok? Did she really tell them she would catch up to them later?  Did she walk on her on volition into that car??

       I know this sounds stupid....but think about it.  How did these jerks KNOW they could do this so easily....in plain site??


Isn't that how GHB works?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Kermit on August 05, 2007, 05:08:30 PM

 arbeej  arbeej is offline
Member
        
Join Date: May 31st, 2005
Posts: 75
arbeej is on a distinguished road
Default Re: HELP - POLICE?! how to contact?!
Elaine,

That is the part that is confusing to me, too. The newspaper report is different from what I heard from my daughter.

My daughter ACTUALLY WITNESSED Natalee right outside the entrance to Carlos & Charlie's at around 1:00 a.m. Monday morning. (The paper says she left at 1:30.) My daughter was leaving the bar with two friends, and they were right behind another group. She called to Natalee and asked if she wanted to walk with them (I forget now if my daughter was headed to the hotel or the bar across the street; I think the latter). Natalee cheerfully said no, she would catch up to the group right ahead and walk with them (implying she would be along in a few moments). My daughter had no idea she would not see Natalee again.

This part my daughter didn't see, but was told by her friends: That Natalie passed them on the road a short while later, and that she was a passenger in a taxi with another person. She clearly did not know she was in danger; she leaned out the window and shouted something like "Aruba!!! WOOHOO!" Still having a wonderful time.

I have read and heard other versions since then -- that she was actually seen getting in a car with three men; that she was alone with the guy in his car; that it was a grey car; that it has been impounded by the police. I don't know which is the accurate account.

The kids she passed assumed she was headed back to the hotel complex. No one thought there was any danger; obviously Natalee did not think so either.

That's the only bit I know was witnessed by my daughter or her other friends. But it is agreed that the guy misrepresented himself, and that she got in willingly. Also, I assume everyone in the bar had been drinking, but none of those who passed Natalee had the impression that Natalee was falling-down-drunk or anything like that. I mean to say, probably she had been drinking and wasn't exercising good judgement, but she wasn't bad off enough to cause concern, or someone with the group would have taken her back to the hotel. There were chaperones there, the kids were of legal drinking age, and no one realized there was any danger.

I'll post if I hear any more news, and now that the media is covering this, I'll very much appreciate reading anything that you guys find out.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Kermit on August 05, 2007, 05:09:50 PM

Hi Kermit
I'm confused....is this the front of C&C's?If so,the back door is really not a back door?

[/quote]

That is the front of CnC's and you can see there is an allyway to the back parking lot.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Carnut on August 05, 2007, 05:12:00 PM
    Well wasn't there some nonsense about her yelling to her friend "Aruba..WOOO             HOOO.."   and Deepak stopping and telling her to get out of the car and go with her friends.   Wasn't this crap in that movie???


Hey Ramm... welcome!

I think they had to say that she yelled because she did.. only it wasn't woo hoo aruba or anything like that....


NYLover I am still not getting anything in my emails...

from what I remember she had a small discussion with the kids of her class after the "whoo hoo" thingy and that they warned her to come out. If at some point there had been need to scream then it happened after that moment when they drove away from Natalee's classmates.
Hi Ramm
Deepak stated that as he drove by some of the MB kids,one MB guy came up to the car and told Natalee to get out,Natalee told him no,that they would bring her back to her hotel.I don't know IF that was ever confirmed by any of the MB kids tho.


That has never been confirmed by any MB kids.

Dash's posts also don't confirm any of this.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Auntiem on August 05, 2007, 05:13:09 PM
 That's what I meant, even in her stat she was trying to get help.  When a person is drugged, of course a cry for help would come out in a strange way.  She could even have yelled Woo Hoo...to yell, get their attention....in her condition that may have been the only possible way
I think if Natalee would have been able to yell out anything it would have been the universal HELP.






Not necessarily, I believe that when people are drugged, they slur their words, have  trouble speaking, thinking...HELP may not have been something Natalee could verbalize in her condition.
  
  Also interesting Dash could not SEE her in the car.  If she opened the window to call for help, she should have been seen, Joran must have pulled her away.







Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Rammstein on August 05, 2007, 05:13:18 PM
    You know what I am sitting here thinking,  how did they know Natalee would go willingly????  Did her friends ask her if she was ok? Did she really tell them she would catch up to them later?  Did she walk on her on volition into that car??

       I know this sounds stupid....but think about it.  How did these jerks KNOW they could do this so easily....in plain site??


as far as we have heard no-one has come forward or no-one we know has given witness evidence as to her not coming of her own volition. C and C's was emptying out, more than just the 3 would have most likely used the walk-way to the parking lot and more cars would have most likely been parked there.

According to the re-construction video they stopped and Natalee talked with some of her friends and in the video she indicated she didn't want to come with her friends but wanted to stay and go with Joran (with the car).

Maybe they promised her they knew a nice club/bar that was open late although then she might have wanted to invite some of her friends with her or made a mention of that.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: fran on August 05, 2007, 05:14:26 PM
I believe it was Dash who said something about the woo hoo thing.  Then after speaking with all the kids, nobody really remembered Natalee yelling out the car window.

so maybe Dash thought she was yelling woo hoo...and she was screaming something else? 

I do believe that she was drugged at CnC's because prior to going she was able to dance and on the higher stage/dancefloor... if she had been as drunk as they tried to claim... doing drugs etc she wouldn't have been able to dance... not if she couldn't walk...

and why does joran's statments as tamikosmom posted the other day... one time he says she is drunk and can't walk... and other times she is an out of control drunken wild child...
   I need to preview... edit... and the other times she is jsut fine and not drunk at all...

If you watch the evolving of the story, Joran originally said Natalee was drunk and doing drugs and they had ***** in the back seat of the car. Then he said they didn't have sex, she was drinking but not drunk and everything was consensual (consensual what?). Then he said she was perfectly fine and they didn't have sex because he forgot his protection (other words).

That's because he found out he could be charged with rape IF she could not give consent. At the same time he was having to make sure that everyone thought that Natalee was perfectly ok with everything that went on that night. From yelling out the window, D offering to let her off, staying at the beach, going to look at sharks, slaves, hitler, anything to make her look bad and he is Mr. Wonderful in shining armor. NOT!!!!!!! POS

His ONLY mistake was to leave Natalee alone on the beach. Oh, except he forgot the part that she was either unconscientious or dead. :-x Oh.......and I do NOT believe her left her on the beach HE said that night either, they were never there. I believe he left her on A beach, just not that one and maybe with a little sand over her? grrrrrrrrrr

JMHO
fran


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 05, 2007, 05:14:40 PM
   You know what I am sitting here thinking,  how did they know Natalee would go willingly????  Did her friends ask her if she was ok? Did she really tell them she would catch up to them later?  Did she walk on her on volition into that car??

       I know this sounds stupid....but think about it.  How did these jerks KNOW they could do this so easily....in plain site??

I think because at least Joran,has done this 20 times before.I don't think she did go willingly,I think she was naive and believed what Joran was potraying himself to be.....a Dutch student sporter staying at the same hotel as Natalee.That's quite a disguise for a monster.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 05, 2007, 05:16:50 PM
    Well wasn't there some nonsense about her yelling to her friend "Aruba..WOOO             HOOO.."   and Deepak stopping and telling her to get out of the car and go with her friends.   Wasn't this crap in that movie???


Hey Ramm... welcome!

I think they had to say that she yelled because she did.. only it wasn't woo hoo aruba or anything like that....


NYLover I am still not getting anything in my emails...

from what I remember she had a small discussion with the kids of her class after the "whoo hoo" thingy and that they warned her to come out. If at some point there had been need to scream then it happened after that moment when they drove away from Natalee's classmates.

Don't think any kids in her class has said they saw her in the car and asked her to get out.

Think that was a misslead from the reenaction show.
Hi Carnut
I haven't heard that confirmed by any of the MB kids either.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 05, 2007, 05:17:40 PM
Kermit  - thanks I was looking for that post of Arbeej's

Here's another (I don't think it's the same)



http://www.tripadvisor.com/ShowTopic-g1-o610-k170488-i9659-Off_topic_chatter.html
"NATALEE WAS NOT THE GIRL WHO WAS SICK IN THE BATHROOM AT C&C's! My daughter had already told me she was puzzled by that story 'cause she neither saw nor heard anything of the kind regarding Natalee. We were at the vigil yesterday and they were discussing that... It turned out to be other girls on the trip. Somebody had mentioned that at church and these girls went, "Oh no! That was US!" It was definitely not Natalee.
My daughter spoke with Natalee right after C&C's closed.
My daughter & her friends came across Nat & Joran as all were exiting the club, and all were walking more or less together toward another group of classmates.
Natalee was walking unassisted (not falling down drunk), spoke ok (though not answering in long sentences), and was not touching Joran. My daughter only noticed that Joran was tall, dark-haired, American-looking; he did not speak and she couldn't read his facial expressions.
Nat turned down my daughter's invitation to go with her little group. (Ironically, they were about to circle the inside of another club to make sure no others were left behind.)
Nat assured them that she was fine, and said she was going to go back to the hotel "with THEM," pointing to the MBHS group just a few yards ahead.
The Kalpoes were nowhere in sight; neither was the car.
Next Alana heard was that Natalee got into a car that many in the group had thought was a taxi. (Those look like regular cars.)
It may be that the Kalpoes pulled up on the street before Natalee reached the next group; Joran may have deliberately stalled her. The group may not have even realized she was behind them, approaching. But while we hear that she got in the car willingly, we know from her comments that it was not her pre-planned intention.
Because of this, I do not believe she knew she would be going anywhere but a fairly short distance down to the hotel. Her plans changed in the blink of an eye, and she was gone."





Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 05, 2007, 05:18:25 PM
I believe it was Dash who said something about the woo hoo thing.  Then after speaking with all the kids, nobody really remembered Natalee yelling out the car window.
Do you know if any of the MB kids actually saw Natalee in the Kalpoe car?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 05, 2007, 05:20:00 PM
I think the open window and shouting thing was mentioned in the PV's to cover just in case the cop that Deepak saw may have witnessed something as they drove by.
I thought I read somewhere that this was actually the Visibility Team that Deepak passed that night...not sure tho.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: NYC_lover on August 05, 2007, 05:20:43 PM

NYLover I am still not getting anything in my emails...

Mrs. Red, I have send a email with my yahoo account too u.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Auntiem on August 05, 2007, 05:23:25 PM
  Well then, did we ever really get the story of those last minuts outside C&C? And I'm not talkin about the fairy tale t.v. version.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 05, 2007, 05:24:06 PM

NYLover I am still not getting anything in my emails...

Mrs. Red, I have send a email with my yahoo account too u.

I got the yahoo one and replied...


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 05, 2007, 05:25:37 PM
I believe it was Dash who said something about the woo hoo thing.  Then after speaking with all the kids, nobody really remembered Natalee yelling out the car window.

so maybe Dash thought she was yelling woo hoo...and she was screaming something else? 

I do believe that she was drugged at CnC's because prior to going she was able to dance and on the higher stage/dancefloor... if she had been as drunk as they tried to claim... doing drugs etc she wouldn't have been able to dance... not if she couldn't walk...

and why does joran's statments as tamikosmom posted the other day... one time he says she is drunk and can't walk... and other times she is an out of control drunken wild child...
I think because Joran got himself in a jam with that lie.
Joran had to lie and say Natalee was drunk because he knew that people who know Natalee well,know dang well she would never go willingly with him....at the same time,he couldn't say she was all that drunk because then it turns into Natalee not giving Joran consent to have sex which would then be rape.Joran sure does weave a lot of webs.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: San on August 05, 2007, 05:26:21 PM
    You know what I am sitting here thinking,  how did they know Natalee would go willingly????  Did her friends ask her if she was ok? Did she really tell them she would catch up to them later?  Did she walk on her on volition into that car??

       I know this sounds stupid....but think about it.  How did these jerks KNOW they could do this so easily....in plain site??


as far as we have heard no-one has come forward or no-one we know has given witness evidence as to her not coming of her own volition. C and C's was emptying out, more than just the 3 would have most likely used the walk-way to the parking lot and more cars would have most likely been parked there.

According to the re-construction video they stopped and Natalee talked with some of her friends and in the video she indicated she didn't want to come with her friends but wanted to stay and go with Joran (with the car).

Maybe they promised her they knew a nice club/bar that was open late although then she might have wanted to invite some of her friends with her or made a mention of that.

This reconstruction video is based on what 3 suspects who are known liars are stating.  We don't know for a fact that Natalee wanted to stay with Joran.  She told her friend that she was going back to the hotel.  It is obsurd to think she would leave her friends to go willingly with these guys just for a drink.  If she wanted to drink some more I'm sure she could have had some drinks at the hotel with her friends.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Rammstein on August 05, 2007, 05:28:04 PM
Don't think any kids in her class has said they saw her in the car and asked her to get out.

Think that was a misslead from the reenaction show.

I think it was David Kock (lawyer of Satish) who said that based on court documents/statements from the students (at least that is what Scrux writes)


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 05, 2007, 05:28:20 PM
    You know what I am sitting here thinking,  how did they know Natalee would go willingly????  Did her friends ask her if she was ok? Did she really tell them she would catch up to them later?  Did she walk on her on volition into that car??

       I know this sounds stupid....but think about it.  How did these jerks KNOW they could do this so easily....in plain site??


as far as we have heard no-one has come forward or no-one we know has given witness evidence as to her not coming of her own volition. C and C's was emptying out, more than just the 3 would have most likely used the walk-way to the parking lot and more cars would have most likely been parked there.

According to the re-construction video they stopped and Natalee talked with some of her friends and in the video she indicated she didn't want to come with her friends but wanted to stay and go with Joran (with the car).

Maybe they promised her they knew a nice club/bar that was open late although then she might have wanted to invite some of her friends with her or made a mention of that.

This reconstruction video is based on what 3 suspects who are known liars are stating.  We don't know for a fact that Natalee wanted to stay with Joran.  She told her friend that she was going back to the hotel.  It is obsurd to think she would leave her friends to go willingly with these guys just for a drink.  If she wanted to drink some more I'm sure she could have had some drinks at the hotel with her friends.

Exactly - especially since it was all inclusive.  She could have just gone back to the hotel.  I really believe that is where she thought she was going.  Joran had told them he was staying there.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 05, 2007, 05:28:44 PM
As usual, San I agree with you.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: SunFreak2 on August 05, 2007, 05:28:48 PM
   You know what I am sitting here thinking,  how did they know Natalee would go willingly????  Did her friends ask her if she was ok? Did she really tell them she would catch up to them later?  Did she walk on her on volition into that car??

       I know this sounds stupid....but think about it.  How did these jerks KNOW they could do this so easily....in plain site??


Isn't that how GHB works?

Hello - yes it works on inhibitions first.  It disinhibits normal instincts.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Kermit on August 05, 2007, 05:29:21 PM
I believe it was Dash who said something about the woo hoo thing.  Then after speaking with all the kids, nobody really remembered Natalee yelling out the car window.
Do you know if any of the MB kids actually saw Natalee in the Kalpoe car?

Virginia Page: I remember dancing with her for most of the time, and then an hour before (Carlos ‘N’ Charlies) closed, I didn’t see her again. She hadn’t planned on meeting (Van der Sloot), he just happened to be there


Ed Kissel: I did not see her getting in the car. I saw her leaving, looked like with Van Der Sloot. I didn't see her getting in the car. You couldn't really see the road from inside the bar, so that is what I saw.   source


Ruth McVay: (quoted in interview as saying) Other friends told (me) the story of how (Natalee) got in the car with strangers.  The friends watched as (Natalee) drove away with three guys the friends had met the day before.



Ben Miller:  he later saw her leave Carlos 'N Charlie's, with Kalpoe and his brother Satish.



Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: fran on August 05, 2007, 05:30:11 PM
Kermit  - thanks I was looking for that post of Arbeej's

Here's another (I don't think it's the same)



http://www.tripadvisor.com/ShowTopic-g1-o610-k170488-i9659-Off_topic_chatter.html
"NATALEE WAS NOT THE GIRL WHO WAS SICK IN THE BATHROOM AT C&C's! My daughter had already told me she was puzzled by that story 'cause she neither saw nor heard anything of the kind regarding Natalee. We were at the vigil yesterday and they were discussing that... It turned out to be other girls on the trip. Somebody had mentioned that at church and these girls went, "Oh no! That was US!" It was definitely not Natalee.
My daughter spoke with Natalee right after C&C's closed.
My daughter & her friends came across Nat & Joran as all were exiting the club, and all were walking more or less together toward another group of classmates.
Natalee was walking unassisted (not falling down drunk), spoke ok (though not answering in long sentences), and was not touching Joran. My daughter only noticed that Joran was tall, dark-haired, American-looking; he did not speak and she couldn't read his facial expressions.
Nat turned down my daughter's invitation to go with her little group. (Ironically, they were about to circle the inside of another club to make sure no others were left behind.)
Nat assured them that she was fine, and said she was going to go back to the hotel "with THEM," pointing to the MBHS group just a few yards ahead.
The Kalpoes were nowhere in sight; neither was the car.
Next Alana heard was that Natalee got into a car that many in the group had thought was a taxi. (Those look like regular cars.)
It may be that the Kalpoes pulled up on the street before Natalee reached the next group; Joran may have deliberately stalled her. The group may not have even realized she was behind them, approaching. But while we hear that she got in the car willingly, we know from her comments that it was not her pre-planned intention.
Because of this, I do not believe she knew she would be going anywhere but a fairly short distance down to the hotel. Her plans changed in the blink of an eye, and she was gone."





IMHO, this is probably the most likely story of what happened. I do NOT think Natalee would have gone home willingly with a stranger, even if he did say he was going to the same hotel and was from a different country. She DEFINITELY wouldn't go home with THREE strangers.

JMHO
fran


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 05, 2007, 05:31:43 PM
I think that they drove around to make sure that the drug took effect...
But why would that matter at that point?They already had her in the car with the music blasting.Makes no sense to me why Deepak would drive around the block a couple of times....if he did.If he did,maybe that was the signal to someone?Like"IF you get your victim in the car,drive around such and such block 2 times".

maybe to stay in proximity to where they could get more if the first dose wasn't enough??
Hmmmm,that makes sense but why would they risk being caught with a half drugged Natalee,screaming and fighting in the car?I don't think they would risk it and I believe at least Joran was/is very experienced in this game so at least he would know to make sure they had enough of the drug.I don't think Joran is an amatur......that's kinda right up there with Joran showing up the last half hour before a bar closes and forgetting his little condoms so he can't have sex....naaaaaa,Joran would like for a lot of people to think he is that innocent and upstanding of a person.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Auntiem on August 05, 2007, 05:33:09 PM
     I still don't think that Natalee, uninhibited or not, would have gotten into a car with 3 guys by herself..  I did some crazy things in college, and in Europe when I was single and with girlfriends, but we NEVER did anything daring by ourselves!!!


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Kermit on August 05, 2007, 05:33:10 PM
Don't think any kids in her class has said they saw her in the car and asked her to get out.

Think that was a misslead from the reenaction show.

I think it was David Kock (lawyer of Satish) who said that based on court documents/statements from the students (at least that is what Scrux writes)

VAN SUSTEREN: How did your client describe what happened when they left Carlos and Charlie's? What did he say happened when they departed?

KOCK: Oh, you know, that when they left the place going towards their car, that Joran showed up with that girl, that the girl was going to drive with them in the car, that they drove around. But first, they also met a couple of friends of the disappeared girl, who told her, why doesn't she get out of the car, and she said, no, that she was going to drive around. They drove around, drove to the lighthouse, and then coming back towards the high-rises, but Joran asked to be dropped here, next to the Marriott, and that the two of them got out of the car and that they left. And for them, that was the end of it.
http://scrux.com/natalee/kockinterview.htm


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: fran on August 05, 2007, 05:34:08 PM
I gotta run and get some work done.  :wink:

I've really enjoyed the conversation today. Hope you all figure this out by the time I get back. It'll probably take me another few days to catch up with you all again at the rate you've been going.

bye

fran



Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: SunFreak2 on August 05, 2007, 05:36:05 PM
    You know what I am sitting here thinking,  how did they know Natalee would go willingly????  Did her friends ask her if she was ok? Did she really tell them she would catch up to them later?  Did she walk on her on volition into that car??

       I know this sounds stupid....but think about it.  How did these jerks KNOW they could do this so easily....in plain site??


as far as we have heard no-one has come forward or no-one we know has given witness evidence as to her not coming of her own volition. C and C's was emptying out, more than just the 3 would have most likely used the walk-way to the parking lot and more cars would have most likely been parked there.

According to the re-construction video they stopped and Natalee talked with some of her friends and in the video she indicated she didn't want to come with her friends but wanted to stay and go with Joran (with the car).

Maybe they promised her they knew a nice club/bar that was open late although then she might have wanted to invite some of her friends with her or made a mention of that.

Dave has said several times, that one of the MB'ers saw one of the Kalpoes leading her out by the elbow. 


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Auntiem on August 05, 2007, 05:37:07 PM
I think that they drove around to make sure that the drug took effect...
But why would that matter at that point?They already had her in the car with the music blasting.Makes no sense to me why Deepak would drive around the block a couple of times....if he did.If he did,maybe that was the signal to someone?Like"IF you get your victim in the car,drive around such and such block 2 times".

maybe to stay in proximity to where they could get more if the first dose wasn't enough??











I'm sure they had drugs of their own to keep her drugged!!


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: SunFreak2 on August 05, 2007, 05:38:35 PM

I think because at least Joran,has done this 20 times before.I don't think she did go willingly,I think she was naive and believed what Joran was potraying himself to be.....a Dutch student sporter staying at the same hotel as Natalee.That's quite a disguise for a monster.

Hi Karma Smish   :cool:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 05, 2007, 05:39:45 PM
Here is a couple of Dash's posts regarding Natalee yelling out the window.  I'm still looking for more:

Jun 14, 2005 10:43 pm:  (Responding to this question, "I read that Natalee rolled down the window and shouted as she drove off with the three guys. Are there any thoughts that, in hindsight, that she was shouting for help?") She wasn't shouting for help, I think she honestly thought they were taking her back to the hotel

Jun 15, 2005 12:02 am:  (Responding to question, "Dash [codename for Alana], can you confirm where she was in the car when she yelled out to you and the others?")  I didn't see her in the car... she must have got in right after she talked to me. I would assume if she yelled then she would have had to be in the backseat, because the car would have been on the right of the sidewalk 


Thanks Klaas
Has it been confirmed that Dash=Alana?
This sounds like Dash wasn't really there when Natalee supposedly yelled out the car window.Also,Natalee was sitting behind Deepak(driving)so does this mean Natalee yelled across the street from the left side backseat?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Rammstein on August 05, 2007, 05:40:56 PM
When they find Natalee (and I hope with all my heart that they do), I think it will be possible to find out the reason for her death but I think that they will not be able to determine whether or not she had been drugged.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 05, 2007, 05:41:50 PM
I think that they drove around to make sure that the drug took effect...
But why would that matter at that point?They already had her in the car with the music blasting.Makes no sense to me why Deepak would drive around the block a couple of times....if he did.If he did,maybe that was the signal to someone?Like"IF you get your victim in the car,drive around such and such block 2 times".










I agree....I didn't get why people were saying they were driving around the block til the drugs kicked in, seems like that would be the last thing they would do, unless, as you said it was as a signal..  You would think once they had her in the car and drugged they would want to get away, and fast.
That's what I'm thinking too AuntieM.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Auntiem on August 05, 2007, 05:42:02 PM
<snipped>

Dave has said several times, that one of the MB'ers saw one of the Kalpoes leading her out by the elbow. 
[/quote]





Dang,  didn't they think something was strange??????Did Deepak look familiar to them??  He obviously was NOT a tourist!!!!



Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 05, 2007, 05:42:36 PM
Don't think any kids in her class has said they saw her in the car and asked her to get out.

Think that was a misslead from the reenaction show.

I think it was David Kock (lawyer of Satish) who said that based on court documents/statements from the students (at least that is what Scrux writes)

VAN SUSTEREN: How did your client describe what happened when they left Carlos and Charlie's? What did he say happened when they departed?

KOCK: Oh, you know, that when they left the place going towards their car, that Joran showed up with that girl, that the girl was going to drive with them in the car, that they drove around. But first, they also met a couple of friends of the disappeared girl, who told her, why doesn't she get out of the car, and she said, no, that she was going to drive around. They drove around, drove to the lighthouse, and then coming back towards the high-rises, but Joran asked to be dropped here, next to the Marriott, and that the two of them got out of the car and that they left. And for them, that was the end of it.
http://scrux.com/natalee/kockinterview.htm


And we know that Deepak and Satish would never lie  :roll:  I just can't imagine Natalee saying "no, I'm going to drive around a while".


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Carnut on August 05, 2007, 05:43:55 PM
When they find Natalee (and I hope with all my heart that they do), I think it will be possible to find out the reason for her death but I think that they will not be able to determine whether or not she had been drugged.

When they find the body they will know Nat is dead and will be able to charge the Perps.

They already have enough to convict them, just no body.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: SunFreak2 on August 05, 2007, 05:45:50 PM
I remember following a link (saved it) to a young teenager's blog.  This girl was from MB.  She had posted how a girl (NH) had gone missing and the family was en route to ARuba to find her.  This was posted that Monday night around 11pm.  I went back several times to her blog and read how the family thought she was being held hostage in a crack house, etc.  This was written in real time with people asking her questions and her responses. Then months later the blog was gone from the link, and of course I had never copied anything and then erased the link after a few more months. Had anyone else seen this site?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Kermit on August 05, 2007, 05:47:31 PM
Quote
And we know that Deepak and Satish would never lie  :roll:  I just can't imagine Natalee saying "no, I'm going to drive around a while".

I agree. But just shows you the attorney is willing to lie for his client when he knows what eye witnesses have stated.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 05, 2007, 05:47:40 PM

Hi Kermit
I'm confused....is this the front of C&C's?If so,the back door is really not a back door?


That is the front of CnC's and you can see there is an allyway to the back parking lot.
[/quote]
Thanks Kermit
Do you know where the back door inside C&C's leads?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Rammstein on August 05, 2007, 05:47:53 PM
When they find Natalee (and I hope with all my heart that they do), I think it will be possible to find out the reason for her death but I think that they will not be able to determine whether or not she had been drugged.

When they find the body they will know Nat is dead and will be able to charge the Perps.

They already have enough to convict them, just no body.

there is circumstantial evidence but I doubt it will be enough if there isn't any forensic evidence on the remains with regards to the three suspects, best scenario would be if they find fingerprints, DNA or something like Joran's shoes with/on her.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Destiny on August 05, 2007, 05:47:57 PM
I gotta run and get some work done.  :wink:

I've really enjoyed the conversation today. Hope you all figure this out by the time I get back. It'll probably take me another few days to catch up with you all again at the rate you've been going.

bye

fran



Nite Fran...LOVE your new clothes ;-)

Destiny


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 05, 2007, 05:50:32 PM
 :smt017 Anyone know who this guy on the left is and why he looks familiar to me?? This was at Bahia aug 3rd.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Carnut on August 05, 2007, 05:51:41 PM
When they find Natalee (and I hope with all my heart that they do), I think it will be possible to find out the reason for her death but I think that they will not be able to determine whether or not she had been drugged.

When they find the body they will know Nat is dead and will be able to charge the Perps.

They already have enough to convict them, just no body.

there is circumstantial evidence but I doubt it will be enough if there isn't any forensic evidence on the remains with regards to the three suspects, best scenario would be if they find fingerprints, DNA or something like Joran's shoes with/on her.

There may be 'real' evidence we are unaware of.

I believe there is enough circumstantial evidence just in the statements for a conviction if a body is found proving at least that Nat is dead and didn't get taken away by aliens from another planet.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 05, 2007, 05:52:23 PM
Friday night Paddock...Santos. 8-3-07


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Auntiem on August 05, 2007, 05:53:07 PM
   Ya know,  I think Geraldo has become a jerk....but he's got one thing right.  Aruba was or is a haven for kids to go and get smashed and get drugs.......and it looks like even some good kids get tricked or caught up in it to some extent, to the point where they are not using there faculties.....and so when her friends saw her, on Deepak's arm .....nothing clicked.....they were just not thinking, and look, look what happened in one moment of hazy thinking...their friend is gone .....

   They graduated from HS, celebrating, feeling grown up, looking forward to College and great carreers afterward....well, there's one lovely girl we know of who will not get that chance ...for what???? A lousy 4 days in the sun of Aruba, and its foul drug-pushers, pimps and rapists.   

           God Bless Beth for her Safe Travels..Who knows how many Natalee's she has already saved!


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 05, 2007, 05:55:11 PM
Nut - I don't recognize the guy in the first photo..I don't know why he looks familiar to you. 

In the second photos that's Andres dos Santos.  He's the one I believe the MB kids thought was the hawaiin looking guy that was in the casino.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Auntiem on August 05, 2007, 05:56:49 PM
  Nut, they all look like of disgusting, drunken pigs to me!!! :puker:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 05, 2007, 05:57:02 PM
    Well wasn't there some nonsense about her yelling to her friend "Aruba..WOOO             HOOO.."   and Deepak stopping and telling her to get out of the car and go with her friends.   Wasn't this crap in that movie???


Hey Ramm... welcome!

I think they had to say that she yelled because she did.. only it wasn't woo hoo aruba or anything like that....


NYLover I am still not getting anything in my emails...

from what I remember she had a small discussion with the kids of her class after the "whoo hoo" thingy and that they warned her to come out. If at some point there had been need to scream then it happened after that moment when they drove away from Natalee's classmates.
Hi Ramm
Deepak stated that as he drove by some of the MB kids,one MB guy came up to the car and told Natalee to get out,Natalee told him no,that they would bring her back to her hotel.I don't know IF that was ever confirmed by any of the MB kids tho.


That has never been confirmed by any MB kids.

Dash's posts also don't confirm any of this.
Thanks Carnut


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: San on August 05, 2007, 05:57:29 PM
When they find Natalee (and I hope with all my heart that they do), I think it will be possible to find out the reason for her death but I think that they will not be able to determine whether or not she had been drugged.

I hope they find her too.  If it was something as simple as ODing they would have just left her on the beach.  In my heart I believe she was beaten to death and thus the reason for the coverup.  They cannot show the world what he did.  Why would Van der Straaten try and negotiate a deal to sent Joran to a mental institution?  Did he make the same kind of deal for the Kalpoes?  No he didn't and why would that be?

This is why they are trying to make the world believe that she OD'd.  There is no proof of her ODing and they want us so badly to take their word that she did.  Produce the body and let the world see for themselves.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Easywriter on August 05, 2007, 06:01:20 PM
He looks like a young Treat Williams. lol


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: SunFreak2 on August 05, 2007, 06:01:28 PM
When they find Natalee (and I hope with all my heart that they do), I think it will be possible to find out the reason for her death but I think that they will not be able to determine whether or not she had been drugged.

I hope they find her too.  If it was something as simple as ODing they would have just left her on the beach.  In my heart I believe she was beaten to death and thus the reason for the coverup.  They cannot show the world what he did.  Why would Van der Straaten try and negotiate a deal to sent Joran to a mental institution?  Did he make the same kind of deal for the Kalpoes?  No he didn't and why would that be?

This is why they are trying to make the world believe that she OD'd.  There is no proof of her ODing and they want us so badly to take their word that she did.  Produce the body and let the world see for themselves.

B/c if they can make her into an OD - then it's a suicide like Pitbull.  Then the perps just desecrated a dead body, and in Natalee's case made the body disappear.  4-6 years for Pitbull's desecration.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Auntiem on August 05, 2007, 06:02:26 PM
   They found Natalee, don't you all remember?  June of 2005.  There was an announcement,and confirmation...we saw Beth's crumpling body as she got the most tragic news of her life!!!!   But then, came the retraction!  What happened???? The body was not "presentable".....too much DNA.  It was "disappeared!!!!


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Rammstein on August 05, 2007, 06:02:41 PM
When they find Natalee (and I hope with all my heart that they do), I think it will be possible to find out the reason for her death but I think that they will not be able to determine whether or not she had been drugged.

I hope they find her too.  If it was something as simple as ODing they would have just left her on the beach.  In my heart I believe she was beaten to death and thus the reason for the coverup.  They cannot show the world what he did.  Why would Van der Straaten try and negotiate a deal to sent Joran to a mental institution?  Did he make the same kind of deal for the Kalpoes?  No he didn't and why would that be?

This is why they are trying to make the world believe that she OD'd.  There is no proof of her ODing and they want us so badly to take their word that she did.  Produce the body and let the world see for themselves.

van der Straten has no power to make deals of that nature (sending Joran to a mental institution).

And I agree, accidental overdose is unlikely.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 05, 2007, 06:03:27 PM
 That's what I meant, even in her stat she was trying to get help.  When a person is drugged, of course a cry for help would come out in a strange way.  She could even have yelled Woo Hoo...to yell, get their attention....in her condition that may have been the only possible way
I think if Natalee would have been able to yell out anything it would have been the universal HELP.






Not necessarily, I believe that when people are drugged, they slur their words, have  trouble speaking, thinking...HELP may not have been something Natalee could verbalize in her condition.
  
  Also interesting Dash could not SEE her in the car.  If she opened the window to call for help, she should have been seen, Joran must have pulled her away.






IMO if Natalee had been able to scream anything at all...she would have just screamed her heart out instead of screaming wooo hooo aruba.
I really don't think she screamed anything,I think this is just a lie told by Deepak to try and cover himself,so he could tell the world"Oh,look,I gave Natalee a chance to get out of the car,after that MB guy told her to get out but she WANTED to stay in my car"So in other words....that's like Joran lying about Natalee being falling down drunk,no she wasn't,yes she was.....they both are trying to get people to believe that Natalee gave her consent,that Natalee wanted them to take her away in the Kalpoe taxi,that Natalee wanted sex with Joran.I don't believe any of that.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Rammstein on August 05, 2007, 06:04:31 PM
   They found Natalee, don't you all remember?  June of 2005.  There was an announcement,and confirmation...we saw Beth's crumpling body as she got the most tragic news of her life!!!!   But then, came the retraction!  What happened???? The body was not "presentable".....too much DNA.  It was "disappeared!!!!

I believe a lot of things but not this rumor. The wrong department/people told this. Remarks like this are the responsibility of the DA's office or the police, not by politicians or people from a ministry.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 05, 2007, 06:05:16 PM
When they find Natalee (and I hope with all my heart that they do), I think it will be possible to find out the reason for her death but I think that they will not be able to determine whether or not she had been drugged.

very highly possible... but I wish they had some of the hair from that backseat ... hair holds the effects of drugs longer than any other part of the body... or so I have read somewhere..


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: GrannyToad on August 05, 2007, 06:06:58 PM
A couple days back I think it was here, someone asked if Aruba has "911". It does. I've seen that sometimes in the papi Aruban news online. If someone's already answered, sorry. I can't read it all.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 05, 2007, 06:07:08 PM
    You know what I am sitting here thinking,  how did they know Natalee would go willingly????  Did her friends ask her if she was ok? Did she really tell them she would catch up to them later?  Did she walk on her on volition into that car??

       I know this sounds stupid....but think about it.  How did these jerks KNOW they could do this so easily....in plain site??


as far as we have heard no-one has come forward or no-one we know has given witness evidence as to her not coming of her own volition. C and C's was emptying out, more than just the 3 would have most likely used the walk-way to the parking lot and more cars would have most likely been parked there.

According to the re-construction video they stopped and Natalee talked with some of her friends and in the video she indicated she didn't want to come with her friends but wanted to stay and go with Joran (with the car).
Maybe they promised her they knew a nice club/bar that was open late although then she might have wanted to invite some of her friends with her or made a mention of that.
I'm sorry Ramm but I don't believe much of that so called reinactment so I can't base any opinions on it.It seemed false to me from what I remember.How could they do a true reinactment based on what the suspects have stated when most of what came out of their mouths were lies?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Auntiem on August 05, 2007, 06:07:17 PM
IT WAS RAPE AND MURDER!!!!


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Rammstein on August 05, 2007, 06:11:01 PM
When they find Natalee (and I hope with all my heart that they do), I think it will be possible to find out the reason for her death but I think that they will not be able to determine whether or not she had been drugged.

very highly possible... but I wish they had some of the hair from that backseat ... hair holds the effects of drugs longer than any other part of the body... or so I have read somewhere..

but if she had been drugged then it would have been to short time wise to had set in the hairs by the time that they had killed her.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Carnut on August 05, 2007, 06:12:58 PM
When they find Natalee (and I hope with all my heart that they do), I think it will be possible to find out the reason for her death but I think that they will not be able to determine whether or not she had been drugged.

very highly possible... but I wish they had some of the hair from that backseat ... hair holds the effects of drugs longer than any other part of the body... or so I have read somewhere..

but if she had been drugged then it would have been to short time wise to had set in the hairs by the time that they had killed her.

Yep.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 05, 2007, 06:14:50 PM
Don't think any kids in her class has said they saw her in the car and asked her to get out.

Think that was a misslead from the reenaction show.

I think it was David Kock (lawyer of Satish) who said that based on court documents/statements from the students (at least that is what Scrux writes)
I would like to read those statements from the MB kids....that does sound familar to me,what you said above Ramm.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 05, 2007, 06:15:00 PM
When they find Natalee (and I hope with all my heart that they do), I think it will be possible to find out the reason for her death but I think that they will not be able to determine whether or not she had been drugged.

very highly possible... but I wish they had some of the hair from that backseat ... hair holds the effects of drugs longer than any other part of the body... or so I have read somewhere..

but if she had been drugged then it would have been to short time wise to had set in the hairs by the time that they had killed her.

The hair test wouldn't work for drugs taken or given to Natalee on the trip. It would only show if she had taken drugs approximately a month or more before according to this link:

http://www.drugtestwithhair.com/questions.htm#g4


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Auntiem on August 05, 2007, 06:15:54 PM
   They found Natalee, don't you all remember?  June of 2005.  There was an announcement,and confirmation...we saw Beth's crumpling body as she got the most tragic news of her life!!!!   But then, came the retraction!  What happened???? The body was not "presentable".....too much DNA.  It was "disappeared!!!!

I believe a lot of things but not this rumor. The wrong department/people told this. Remarks like this are the responsibility of the DA's office or the police, not by politicians or people from a ministry.









I'm sorry was this a rumor?????   It came across the newswires as an announcement from the Aruban Government, I thought.  Can anybody here please clarify who made this announcement that Natalee had been found and where her body was?  Where they rushed Beth and Jug to? I didn't know this was only a rumor?  How could that happen?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Carnut on August 05, 2007, 06:17:02 PM
Don't think any kids in her class has said they saw her in the car and asked her to get out.

Think that was a misslead from the reenaction show.

I think it was David Kock (lawyer of Satish) who said that based on court documents/statements from the students (at least that is what Scrux writes)
I would like to read those statements from the MB kids....that does sound familar to me,what you said above Ramm.

Kock was just echoing the misdirection plan.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 05, 2007, 06:18:29 PM
I believe it was Dash who said something about the woo hoo thing.  Then after speaking with all the kids, nobody really remembered Natalee yelling out the car window.
Do you know if any of the MB kids actually saw Natalee in the Kalpoe car?

Virginia Page: I remember dancing with her for most of the time, and then an hour before (Carlos ‘N’ Charlies) closed, I didn’t see her again. She hadn’t planned on meeting (Van der Sloot), he just happened to be there


Ed Kissel: I did not see her getting in the car. I saw her leaving, looked like with Van Der Sloot. I didn't see her getting in the car. You couldn't really see the road from inside the bar, so that is what I saw.   source


Ruth McVay: (quoted in interview as saying) Other friends told (me) the story of how (Natalee) got in the car with strangers.  The friends watched as (Natalee) drove away with three guys the friends had met the day before.



Ben Miller:  he later saw her leave Carlos 'N Charlie's, with Kalpoe and his brother Satish.


Thanks Kermit
Do you know when and with whom Ruth made these statements?I don't remember her saying that or Ben Miller...actually the first time I have heard his name is now.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 05, 2007, 06:22:13 PM
AuntieEM.... Julia, was the one that concocted that rumor... it fits with the whole rushing the family to the empty locked courthouse...



Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Buckeye on August 05, 2007, 06:22:43 PM
A couple days back I think it was here, someone asked if Aruba has "911". It does. I've seen that sometimes in the papi Aruban news online. If someone's already answered, sorry. I can't read it all.

When I first searched, in 2005.  There was no 911 listed in tourist brochures, etc.  There were seperate numbers for ambulance, police (by station), etc.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 05, 2007, 06:23:01 PM
Don't think any kids in her class has said they saw her in the car and asked her to get out.

Think that was a misslead from the reenaction show.

I think it was David Kock (lawyer of Satish) who said that based on court documents/statements from the students (at least that is what Scrux writes)

VAN SUSTEREN: How did your client describe what happened when they left Carlos and Charlie's? What did he say happened when they departed?

KOCK: Oh, you know, that when they left the place going towards their car, that Joran showed up with that girl, that the girl was going to drive with them in the car, that they drove around. But first, they also met a couple of friends of the disappeared girl, who told her, why doesn't she get out of the car, and she said, no, that she was going to drive around. They drove around, drove to the lighthouse, and then coming back towards the high-rises, but Joran asked to be dropped here, next to the Marriott, and that the two of them got out of the car and that they left. And for them, that was the end of it.
http://scrux.com/natalee/kockinterview.htm

Yeah,but that all comes from one suspects defense atty so I take that with a grain of salt unless it can be proven by someone less biased.
:)


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Carnut on August 05, 2007, 06:23:57 PM
Lots of folks saw Nat leaving CnC's in various ways.

No one has confirmed seeing Nat shouting out of the window of the car after is stopped at an intersection except the perps.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 05, 2007, 06:24:17 PM
I gotta run and get some work done.  :wink:

I've really enjoyed the conversation today. Hope you all figure this out by the time I get back. It'll probably take me another few days to catch up with you all again at the rate you've been going.

bye

fran


Have a good night Fran. :D


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 05, 2007, 06:25:54 PM
I gotta run and get some work done.  :wink:

I've really enjoyed the conversation today. Hope you all figure this out by the time I get back. It'll probably take me another few days to catch up with you all again at the rate you've been going.

bye

fran

bye Fran... see you later


Have a good night Fran. :D


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 05, 2007, 06:26:05 PM
    You know what I am sitting here thinking,  how did they know Natalee would go willingly????  Did her friends ask her if she was ok? Did she really tell them she would catch up to them later?  Did she walk on her on volition into that car??

       I know this sounds stupid....but think about it.  How did these jerks KNOW they could do this so easily....in plain site??


as far as we have heard no-one has come forward or no-one we know has given witness evidence as to her not coming of her own volition. C and C's was emptying out, more than just the 3 would have most likely used the walk-way to the parking lot and more cars would have most likely been parked there.

According to the re-construction video they stopped and Natalee talked with some of her friends and in the video she indicated she didn't want to come with her friends but wanted to stay and go with Joran (with the car).

Maybe they promised her they knew a nice club/bar that was open late although then she might have wanted to invite some of her friends with her or made a mention of that.

Dave has said several times, that one of the MB'ers saw one of the Kalpoes leading her out by the elbow. 
Right,I remember that.That was the MB guy who was across the street from C&C's I think.Who knows how much he got right in that.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 05, 2007, 06:27:23 PM

I think because at least Joran,has done this 20 times before.I don't think she did go willingly,I think she was naive and believed what Joran was potraying himself to be.....a Dutch student sporter staying at the same hotel as Natalee.That's quite a disguise for a monster.

Hi Karma Smish   :cool:
Hi SF! :cool:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: SunFreak2 on August 05, 2007, 06:27:57 PM
Here's a link to many of the student quotes over at Scux.

http://scrux.com/natalee/studentquotes.htm


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Buckeye on August 05, 2007, 06:28:29 PM
Arm bone

There is a theory related to body proportions (sorta like the foot and forearm thing).  Phi is a relationship equal to 1.618.  Various body proportions are based on this number.  Studies using this info have found the forearm related to the forearm plus the hand to be in a proportion of 1.715.  The picture, in the paper, if adding a little for the finger out of view, is proportioned to 1.7.  I have no idea about monkey or donkey bone proportions.  By relationship, the arm bone could be human.  Wasn't there a plane wreck in Venz. at that time??

http://hypertextbook.com/facts/2006/bodyproportions.shtml


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Auntiem on August 05, 2007, 06:30:48 PM
  I know Julia found Jug and Beth in town shopping ( seems Jug needed some things) and the three raced to the place where the body was supposed to be, however, I do not rememberJulia being the person who made a mistake.  I remember there were several others involved, it came across television, and the police in Aruba and higher ups were also involved.  This was not a little ploy of Julia's. Something WAS found that day!  I believe it was on the 13th of June, something like that.....oh, they found something, I believe they found Natalee, but perhaps that is when they also found their Tourism Pros.(possibly the one who is now in West Palm???) and were advised what would hurt their tourism!!!


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 05, 2007, 06:31:11 PM
Arm bone

There is a theory related to body proportions (sorta like the foot and forearm thing).  Phi is a relationship equal to 1.618.  Various body proportions are based on this number.  Studies using this info have found the forearm related to the forearm plus the hand to be in a proportion of 1.715.  The picture, in the paper, if adding a little for the finger out of view, is proportioned to 1.7.  I have no idea about monkey or donkey bone proportions.  By relationship, the arm bone could be human.  Wasn't there a plane wreck in Venz. at that time??

http://hypertextbook.com/facts/2006/bodyproportions.shtml

Yes Buckeye - the plane crash in Venezuela was right after the arm bone was found.  This tied up the forensic lab in Venezuela identifying the dead in the plane crash.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Buckeye on August 05, 2007, 06:34:48 PM
Guido and the car (and the lie in Joran's book that he never talked to Guido again).

Greta May 23, 2006

.....

Spong

June last year he was first a witness, he gave 5 witness statements 3 in aruba 2 in Holland. Months later 5 witness came with story that they say scratches were on his face of 6 cm long, very deep which were looking like they caused by human nails. Very strange that those statements were delivered 9 months after the fact. He was questioned on Aruba 3 days after Natalee disappeared and nobody from ALE has seen those scratches so it's a fake story

It's a complete fake story and the idea from the prosecution is he might have had makeup to coverup those scratches.

There was another argument that he was driving a white car, and it was seen by the place where she disappeared. Half of arubans in this sunny island is driving a white car, it's normal in the tropics. It is a weak argument.

Greta:

Joe Tacopina, I understand your client spoke to Guido today by phone. What did Guido say to Joran. Joe I know that you have attorney / client privilege but tell us what you can


Joe

He actually gave me persmision to talk about it, he was upset for Guido he apoke to Guido's sister and said he was sorry he got dragged in and Guido was on the phone, he said Joran one thing the cops said is they have no case against you...They would like Guido to give statement against Joran. He wasn't willing to make up a lie, he sat there for no good reason, they made prosecutorial reason to realease him and kept him overnight so he missed another exam.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: SunFreak2 on August 05, 2007, 06:35:05 PM
Hear's a link to many, many articles about Natalee's story.

http://nataleeholloway.tripod.com/


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 05, 2007, 06:35:16 PM
Arm bone

There is a theory related to body proportions (sorta like the foot and forearm thing).  Phi is a relationship equal to 1.618.  Various body proportions are based on this number.  Studies using this info have found the forearm related to the forearm plus the hand to be in a proportion of 1.715.  The picture, in the paper, if adding a little for the finger out of view, is proportioned to 1.7.  I have no idea about monkey or donkey bone proportions.  By relationship, the arm bone could be human.  Wasn't there a plane wreck in Venz. at that time??

http://hypertextbook.com/facts/2006/bodyproportions.shtml

Yes Buckeye - the plane crash in Venezuela was right after the arm bone was found.  This tied up the forensic lab in Venezuela identifying the dead in the plane crash.

The arm bone found was reported in the paper August 11, 2005.  The plane crash was August 16, 2005:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4156224.stm


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on August 05, 2007, 06:35:43 PM
   They found Natalee, don't you all remember?  June of 2005.  There was an announcement,and confirmation...we saw Beth's crumpling body as she got the most tragic news of her life!!!!   But then, came the retraction!  What happened???? The body was not "presentable".....too much DNA.  It was "disappeared!!!!

I believe a lot of things but not this rumor. The wrong department/people told this. Remarks like this are the responsibility of the DA's office or the police, not by politicians or people from a ministry.

Hey Rammstein welcome !


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Auntiem on August 05, 2007, 06:36:29 PM
 :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:

     The plane crashed AFTER the arm bone was found???


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Rammstein on August 05, 2007, 06:37:04 PM
I'm sorry was this a rumor?????   It came across the newswires as an announcement from the Aruban Government, I thought.  Can anybody here please clarify who made this announcement that Natalee had been found and where her body was?  Where they rushed Beth and Jug to? I didn't know this was only a rumor?  How could that happen?

it most likely was just like in the miners incident in West Virginia where it was first reported that there were 12 survivors of the mine-disaster where as only 1 was found alive.

Information regarding finding of bodies is the sole responsibility of the police, often in corroboration with the DA. They will never confirm it is a certain person until formal identification has taken place, when found it will be said that a body has been found.

I would guess that Joran was being taken by the police to the last places he was with Natalee (according to his not too believable words) or where he left her. Some ministry official must have picked up on those reports and that could have lead to him thinking she had been found (taken her to the place he left her). So he spoke out of place and without having confirmation that there actually was a body and whether a positive ID had been made.

The odds on favorite for Natalee's resting place is the water around Aruba, at least that is what I believe and thus she could never have been found on land. Also if the police had believed to have found her they would have called in members of the forensic team on the island to dig up the body and preserve the evidence. The media was all over Joran when he came out of the beach area if I remember correctly, the media (if the discovery had been true) would have been all over that area in a heartbeat and would have filmed something to that effect.

Although I cannot 100% say that it is a fact, I don't believe it is anything more than a rumor.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Buckeye on August 05, 2007, 06:39:11 PM
Arm bone

There is a theory related to body proportions (sorta like the foot and forearm thing).  Phi is a relationship equal to 1.618.  Various body proportions are based on this number.  Studies using this info have found the forearm related to the forearm plus the hand to be in a proportion of 1.715.  The picture, in the paper, if adding a little for the finger out of view, is proportioned to 1.7.  I have no idea about monkey or donkey bone proportions.  By relationship, the arm bone could be human.  Wasn't there a plane wreck in Venz. at that time??

http://hypertextbook.com/facts/2006/bodyproportions.shtml

Yes Buckeye - the plane crash in Venezuela was right after the arm bone was found.  This tied up the forensic lab in Venezuela identifying the dead in the plane crash.

The arm bone found was reported in the paper August 11, 2005.  The plane crash was August 16, 2005:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4156224.stm

 :shock: :shock:  I thought it was after...hmmmmm..


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 05, 2007, 06:40:16 PM
Human skeleton:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub2/humanskel.jpg)

Arm bone found:


(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub2/bone0805-1.jpg)


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 05, 2007, 06:41:24 PM
:shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:

     The plane crashed AFTER the arm bone was found???

Yes, the plane crashed about 5-6 days after the arm bone was found.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: SunFreak2 on August 05, 2007, 06:42:43 PM
On 6-11 Aruban police commissioner van der Straaten was asked by a Dutch journalist if he had any hopes for a positive outcome? Van der Straaten replied, “You always have to be hopeful, but I don’t believe anymore that we will find Natalee alive.” When asked why not, van der Straaten replied, “Because I know the details of the investigation and you don't!”

I believe this is when they realized she was dead and started calling it a homicide instead of a missing person.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 05, 2007, 06:43:08 PM
Thanks Klaas.....I knew who Santos was, but the other guy I didn't know (in the other pix).

**I have a question re: a rumour from way back regarding something Marcia Twitty either said or didn't say (which would be my guess) or something that was taken out of context. When or if or whatever....did Marcia Twitty say anything about 'if it all gets out, we are all going down, INCLUDING Natalee'....and to whom did she supposedly say this to. The only place I have seen this is at RU and I find no where else that this is mentioned.  Was this something that was made up by Glenda/jr or what?? Or was it something that Marcia said and was twisted by RU peeps to make it fit their agenda?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 05, 2007, 06:44:27 PM
Nut - I have never seen that anywhere except RU and I believe it's total BS.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on August 05, 2007, 06:44:43 PM
Klaas that drawing of the skeleton shows clearly that there is no bone connecting wrist and hand, yet the skeleton found shows the 2 still connected. I have some problem with this.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 05, 2007, 06:45:32 PM
I remember following a link (saved it) to a young teenager's blog.  This girl was from MB.  She had posted how a girl (NH) had gone missing and the family was en route to ARuba to find her.  This was posted that Monday night around 11pm.  I went back several times to her blog and read how the family thought she was being held hostage in a crack house, etc.  This was written in real time with people asking her questions and her responses. Then months later the blog was gone from the link, and of course I had never copied anything and then erased the link after a few more months. Had anyone else seen this site?
Hey SF....I was just reading exactly what you wrote above...the other day.I think it was an aruba travel blog....I'll see if I can find it.
Here is one site but it looks different...I'll keep looking.http://www.aruba.com/forum/f7/missing-2016/


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Buckeye on August 05, 2007, 06:46:23 PM
Ramm
From my memory, the initial reports were late.  There was a Birmingham reporter on the island talking about heading to the lighthouse in the dark...others were going towards Huts.

What would the scene have been like if Natalee was found and found to have brutalized??  Is there a possibility that tourism is so important and there was so much media to announce the findings, that the powers that be, decided it would be better that she not be found??  Is it possible??


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 05, 2007, 06:46:41 PM
Klaas that drawing of the skeleton shows clearly that there is no bone connecting wrist and hand, yet the skeleton found shows the 2 still connected. I have some problem with this.

BB - I don't think there is anything clear about the scanned photo of the arm I posted.  I can put it in photoshop and see if I can make it clearer.  I do see what you mean though.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on August 05, 2007, 06:47:09 PM
Klaas that drawing of the skeleton shows clearly that there is no bone connecting wrist and hand, yet the skeleton found shows the 2 still connected. I have some problem with this.


(http://www.boneroom.com/bone/images_humanbone/artarma.jpg)


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Buckeye on August 05, 2007, 06:47:39 PM
I remember following a link (saved it) to a young teenager's blog.  This girl was from MB.  She had posted how a girl (NH) had gone missing and the family was en route to ARuba to find her.  This was posted that Monday night around 11pm.  I went back several times to her blog and read how the family thought she was being held hostage in a crack house, etc.  This was written in real time with people asking her questions and her responses. Then months later the blog was gone from the link, and of course I had never copied anything and then erased the link after a few more months. Had anyone else seen this site?
Hey SF....I was just reading exactly what you wrote above...the other day.I think it was an aruba travel blog....I'll see if I can find it.
Here is one site but it looks different...I'll keep looking.http://www.aruba.com/forum/f7/missing-2016/

I remember that also.  An Aruban bb and the girl was not believed at first.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 05, 2007, 06:49:38 PM
Klaas that drawing of the skeleton shows clearly that there is no bone connecting wrist and hand, yet the skeleton found shows the 2 still connected. I have some problem with this.

BB - I don't think there is anything clear about the scanned photo of the arm I posted.  I can put it in photoshop and see if I can make it clearer.  I do see what you mean though.

I don't think we are seeing bone at the wrist, I think it's tissue.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Rammstein on August 05, 2007, 06:50:54 PM
Ramm
From my memory, the initial reports were late.  There was a Birmingham reporter on the island talking about heading to the lighthouse in the dark...others were going towards Huts.

What would the scene have been like if Natalee was found and found to have brutalized??  Is there a possibility that tourism is so important and there was so much media to announce the findings, that the powers that be, decided it would be better that she not be found??  Is it possible??

but by the time Joran and K2 were arrested there was lot's of media. I think the day the body supposedly was discovered was after his arrest.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: GrannyToad on August 05, 2007, 06:52:04 PM
Ramm
From my memory, the initial reports were late.  There was a Birmingham reporter on the island talking about heading to the lighthouse in the dark...others were going towards Huts.

What would the scene have been like if Natalee was found and found to have brutalized??  Is there a possibility that tourism is so important and there was so much media to announce the findings, that the powers that be, decided it would be better that she not be found??  Is it possible??

Was it "justice minister" Rudy Croes who said just that in the first few days? Desaparecido is a way of life in that part of the world. It's part of the mindset as much as the language.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 05, 2007, 06:52:04 PM
I remember following a link (saved it) to a young teenager's blog.  This girl was from MB.  She had posted how a girl (NH) had gone missing and the family was en route to ARuba to find her.  This was posted that Monday night around 11pm.  I went back several times to her blog and read how the family thought she was being held hostage in a crack house, etc.  This was written in real time with people asking her questions and her responses. Then months later the blog was gone from the link, and of course I had never copied anything and then erased the link after a few more months. Had anyone else seen this site?
Found it:
http://www.tripadvisor.com/ShowTopic-g147247-i144-k158081-o140-Alert-Aruba.html


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Buckeye on August 05, 2007, 06:55:23 PM
Ramm
From my memory, the initial reports were late.  There was a Birmingham reporter on the island talking about heading to the lighthouse in the dark...others were going towards Huts.

What would the scene have been like if Natalee was found and found to have brutalized??  Is there a possibility that tourism is so important and there was so much media to announce the findings, that the powers that be, decided it would be better that she not be found??  Is it possible??

but by the time Joran and K2 were arrested there was lot's of media. I think the day the body supposedly was discovered was after his arrest.

Yes, June 10th.  The day he looked devastated. I believe they found her and did the final disposal...to save the island.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 05, 2007, 06:55:34 PM
:smt017 Anyone know who this guy on the left is and why he looks familiar to me?? This was at Bahia aug 3rd.
He looks like he could be related to Joe Tacopenishead.
:)


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: SunFreak2 on August 05, 2007, 06:55:48 PM
Ramm
From my memory, the initial reports were late.  There was a Birmingham reporter on the island talking about heading to the lighthouse in the dark...others were going towards Huts.

What would the scene have been like if Natalee was found and found to have brutalized??  Is there a possibility that tourism is so important and there was so much media to announce the findings, that the powers that be, decided it would be better that she not be found??  Is it possible??

but by the time Joran and K2 were arrested there was lot's of media. I think the day the body supposedly was discovered was after his arrest.

Yes, J2K arrested on 9th.

On 10th- reports she was found dead

on 10th - Rocks video & paiting the following day

on 11th - police searched lighthouse are, Bubali Plas & Canishito

on 11th - retraction of she's been found dead


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Buckeye on August 05, 2007, 06:59:00 PM
Ramm
From my memory, the initial reports were late.  There was a Birmingham reporter on the island talking about heading to the lighthouse in the dark...others were going towards Huts.

What would the scene have been like if Natalee was found and found to have brutalized??  Is there a possibility that tourism is so important and there was so much media to announce the findings, that the powers that be, decided it would be better that she not be found??  Is it possible??

but by the time Joran and K2 were arrested there was lot's of media. I think the day the body supposedly was discovered was after his arrest.

Yes, J2K arrested on 9th.

On 10th- reports she was found dead

on 10th - Rocks video & paiting the following day

on 11th - police searched lighthouse are, Bubali Plas & Canishito

on 11th - retraction of she's been found dead

13th  Jan VDS records casual conversation with arrested suspect and offers him time in a mental institution (?? because of the horrid condition Natalee was found to be??).


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: GrannyToad on August 05, 2007, 06:59:22 PM
Klaas that drawing of the skeleton shows clearly that there is no bone connecting wrist and hand, yet the skeleton found shows the 2 still connected. I have some problem with this.

(http://www.boneroom.com/bone/images_humanbone/artarma.jpg)

Nice image, bleach. I think if one compares this image and the other, the finger bones are different proportions from humans'. That suggests to me a brachiating primate cousin. Seeing only the photo I'm not good enough at comparative primate osteology to have taken a shot at it - but I just did.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Auntiem on August 05, 2007, 07:00:18 PM
    Where did the terms heavy battery come from?  I believe they were the charges against two of thw suspects arrested in Natalee's case. How did they know? Kidnapping, rape and heavy battery I believe were the exact charges.   (?????)



    Strange, just like they are now claiming Cocaine Overdose??????

        No, I think, for the former, they indeed, ascertained rape and heavy battery!!!


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: SunFreak2 on August 05, 2007, 07:00:28 PM
Ramm
From my memory, the initial reports were late.  There was a Birmingham reporter on the island talking about heading to the lighthouse in the dark...others were going towards Huts.

What would the scene have been like if Natalee was found and found to have brutalized??  Is there a possibility that tourism is so important and there was so much media to announce the findings, that the powers that be, decided it would be better that she not be found??  Is it possible??

but by the time Joran and K2 were arrested there was lot's of media. I think the day the body supposedly was discovered was after his arrest.

Yes, J2K arrested on 9th.

On 10th- reports she was found dead

on 10th - Rocks video & paiting the following day

on 11th - police searched lighthouse are, Bubali Plas & Canishito

on 11th - retraction of she's been found dead

I believe she was found, and disposed of b/c the spin doctors said it would be better to not find a body to save tourism.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 05, 2007, 07:02:10 PM
   They found Natalee, don't you all remember?  June of 2005.  There was an announcement,and confirmation...we saw Beth's crumpling body as she got the most tragic news of her life!!!!   But then, came the retraction!  What happened???? The body was not "presentable".....too much DNA.  It was "disappeared!!!!

I believe a lot of things but not this rumor. The wrong department/people told this. Remarks like this are the responsibility of the DA's office or the police, not by politicians or people from a ministry.
Didn't Dompig also announce this?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 05, 2007, 07:02:23 PM
Klaas that drawing of the skeleton shows clearly that there is no bone connecting wrist and hand, yet the skeleton found shows the 2 still connected. I have some problem with this.


(http://www.boneroom.com/bone/images_humanbone/artarma.jpg)

(http://www.eorthopod.com/images/ContentImages/hand/hand_anatomy/hand_anatomy_bones01.jpg)

Ligaments:

(http://www.uphs.upenn.edu/ortho/oj/1999/html/PICS/p27f2.gif)


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Auntiem on August 05, 2007, 07:03:31 PM
   Who else could hide her body better from the polis THAN the polis!!!!


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Auntiem on August 05, 2007, 07:04:49 PM
   They found Natalee, don't you all remember?  June of 2005.  There was an announcement,and confirmation...we saw Beth's crumpling body as she got the most tragic news of her life!!!!   But then, came the retraction!  What happened???? The body was not "presentable".....too much DNA.  It was "disappeared!!!!

I believe a lot of things but not this rumor. The wrong department/people told this. Remarks like this are the responsibility of the DA's office or the police, not by politicians or people from a ministry.
Didn't Dompig also announce this?













YES!!!!!!   It was not a RUMOR!!!!!!


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 05, 2007, 07:04:55 PM
Don't think any kids in her class has said they saw her in the car and asked her to get out.

Think that was a misslead from the reenaction show.

I think it was David Kock (lawyer of Satish) who said that based on court documents/statements from the students (at least that is what Scrux writes)
I would like to read those statements from the MB kids....that does sound familar to me,what you said above Ramm.

Kock was just echoing the misdirection plan.
Now that I do believe.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Carnut on August 05, 2007, 07:05:30 PM
   Who else could hide her body better from the polis THAN the polis!!!!

I'm pretty sure PVDS handled the body disposal.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Rammstein on August 05, 2007, 07:05:40 PM
13th  Jan VDS records casual conversation with arrested suspect and offers him time in a mental institution (?? because of the horrid condition Natalee was found to be??).

this is what van der Straten wrote:
Quote
JORAN - JUNE 13TH 2005

Proces-verbaal findings

I, Jan van der STRATEN, police chief with the Aruban Police Corps, state the following.

On Monday June 13th 2005, at approximately 13.00 hours I spoke informally with the suspect Joran Andreas Petrus v/d SLOOT at the police station in Oranjestad.

On my question to Joran whether he can tell me what happened after the girl had fallen asleep on the beach near Fisherman's Hut, he answered:

“I called DEEPAK and he came with two dogs. I think he raped the girl and did something to her.”

To my question where the girl was buried then, he answered:
“I think that it was buried then next to the wall of the Fisherman's Hut, for the rest I would not know either.”

During the conversation Joran showed differing emotions. Sometimes he cried, sometimes he was direct in his answers.

Joran also indicated that he was very sorry for his family and that he had the best contact with his father.

When I asked him why did he lie to his father about the Holiday Inn, Joran answered that he had disappointed his father in/with that.

Of this I reported on my oath as officer on June 17th 2005.


J. van der STRATEN

I don't see anything regarding a mental institution.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on August 05, 2007, 07:05:57 PM
Yes, IMO the arm/hand would likely fall apart at all those small joints or at least most of them without flesh holding. I know about tendons but that bone has obviously had alot of loss. I don't think there is any way to know more about that particular arm bone......


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Buckeye on August 05, 2007, 07:06:46 PM
   Where did the terms heavy battery come from?  I believe they were the charges against two of thw suspects arrested in Natalee's case. How did they know? Kidnapping, rape and heavy battery I believe were the exact charges.   (?????)



    Strange, just like they are now claiming Cocaine Overdose??????

        No, I think, for the former, they indeed, ascertained rape and heavy battery!!!

IIRC  Only Guido had the "heavy" battery charge.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 05, 2007, 07:07:25 PM
Here's a link to many of the student quotes over at Scux.

http://scrux.com/natalee/studentquotes.htm
Thanks SF.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Auntiem on August 05, 2007, 07:07:39 PM
  The Disinformation Squad has arrived!!!!!  :2waver:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 05, 2007, 07:07:46 PM
13th  Jan VDS records casual conversation with arrested suspect and offers him time in a mental institution (?? because of the horrid condition Natalee was found to be??).

this is what van der Straten wrote:
Quote
JORAN - JUNE 13TH 2005

Proces-verbaal findings

I, Jan van der STRATEN, police chief with the Aruban Police Corps, state the following.

On Monday June 13th 2005, at approximately 13.00 hours I spoke informally with the suspect Joran Andreas Petrus v/d SLOOT at the police station in Oranjestad.

On my question to Joran whether he can tell me what happened after the girl had fallen asleep on the beach near Fisherman's Hut, he answered:

“I called DEEPAK and he came with two dogs. I think he raped the girl and did something to her.”

To my question where the girl was buried then, he answered:
“I think that it was buried then next to the wall of the Fisherman's Hut, for the rest I would not know either.”

During the conversation Joran showed differing emotions. Sometimes he cried, sometimes he was direct in his answers.

Joran also indicated that he was very sorry for his family and that he had the best contact with his father.

When I asked him why did he lie to his father about the Holiday Inn, Joran answered that he had disappointed his father in/with that.

Of this I reported on my oath as officer on June 17th 2005.


J. van der STRATEN

I don't see anything regarding a mental institution.

Ramm - it's in Joran's book, Joran's words of what Jan van der Straten said to him.  It may not have been written down.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 05, 2007, 07:09:09 PM
Arm bone

There is a theory related to body proportions (sorta like the foot and forearm thing).  Phi is a relationship equal to 1.618.  Various body proportions are based on this number.  Studies using this info have found the forearm related to the forearm plus the hand to be in a proportion of 1.715.  The picture, in the paper, if adding a little for the finger out of view, is proportioned to 1.7.  I have no idea about monkey or donkey bone proportions.  By relationship, the arm bone could be human.  Wasn't there a plane wreck in Venz. at that time??

http://hypertextbook.com/facts/2006/bodyproportions.shtml
Yes,at least that's what we heard at the time when they found the bone there.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 05, 2007, 07:09:11 PM
 The Disinformation Squad has arrived!!!!!  :2waver:

what does that mean?  I think everyone here is hoping for justice for Natalee.... we just all have different theories...

or do you mean that the disinformation team arrived around june 11th?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Rammstein on August 05, 2007, 07:09:52 PM
   They found Natalee, don't you all remember?  June of 2005.  There was an announcement,and confirmation...we saw Beth's crumpling body as she got the most tragic news of her life!!!!   But then, came the retraction!  What happened???? The body was not "presentable".....too much DNA.  It was "disappeared!!!!

I believe a lot of things but not this rumor. The wrong department/people told this. Remarks like this are the responsibility of the DA's office or the police, not by politicians or people from a ministry.
Didn't Dompig also announce this?

YES!!!!!!   It was not a RUMOR!!!!!!

I don't remember him ever saying such a thing. Especially not as it was him that came with the anonymous witness that knew the location and it was him that got the specialized dog teams from the KLPD to come and look for her body. If he had already said she had been found then he would not have needed to do this and he would certainly have been asked by the media to explain why he was not looking for a body if he had already pronounced that she had been found?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Auntiem on August 05, 2007, 07:10:44 PM
   Where did the terms heavy battery come from?  I believe they were the charges against two of thw suspects arrested in Natalee's case. How did they know? Kidnapping, rape and heavy battery I believe were the exact charges.   (?????)



    Strange, just like they are now claiming Cocaine Overdose??????

    









IIRC  Only Guido had the "heavy" battery charge.
[/quote[





Against whom?????   Who was his victim??????  Natalee!!!!  Heavy BATTERY!!!!!!!
      
       AND HOW WOULD THEY KNOW???????


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: SunFreak2 on August 05, 2007, 07:10:45 PM
Oy vey, anatomy 101!   :2doh: :lol: :lol: :lol:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on August 05, 2007, 07:11:12 PM
  The Disinformation Squad has arrived!!!!!  :2waver:

what does that mean?  I think everyone here is hoping for justice for Natalee.... we just all have different theories...

or do you mean that the disinformation team arrived around june 11th?

I'd like to understand that one too MrsRed.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 05, 2007, 07:13:16 PM
Chapter 11 of Joran's book from Scrux:

(snipped)

P. 156

Jacobs also says that he does not believe the Kalpoes, but believes Joran. "Since they are brothers, brothers stick together. They'll turn against you when it's in their benefit. what do you think is more important family or friends."

Joran became confused. He didn't know what happened to Natalee. He was in jail and was lying and now the Kalpoes are lying about him, so the only possibility is that they did something to the girl. Why would the Kalpoes speak badly about Joran when they said they did nothig bad to the girl.

Van der Straaten arrives and tells Joran that he "has known your father for years. I only want to help you. I am going to see to it that you can go to Holland, that you will not have to go to jail, but that you will be committed to a mental institution. You only have to tell the truth."

(snipped)


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: MsVada on August 05, 2007, 07:13:44 PM
(http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a229/msdarthvada/monkey_skeleton.jpg)


here is the arm of a monkey....for comparison


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Buckeye on August 05, 2007, 07:14:24 PM
13th  Jan VDS records casual conversation with arrested suspect and offers him time in a mental institution (?? because of the horrid condition Natalee was found to be??).

this is what van der Straten wrote:
Quote
JORAN - JUNE 13TH 2005

Proces-verbaal findings

I, Jan van der STRATEN, police chief with the Aruban Police Corps, state the following.

On Monday June 13th 2005, at approximately 13.00 hours I spoke informally with the suspect Joran Andreas Petrus v/d SLOOT at the police station in Oranjestad.

On my question to Joran whether he can tell me what happened after the girl had fallen asleep on the beach near Fisherman's Hut, he answered:

“I called DEEPAK and he came with two dogs. I think he raped the girl and did something to her.”

To my question where the girl was buried then, he answered:
“I think that it was buried then next to the wall of the Fisherman's Hut, for the rest I would not know either.”

During the conversation Joran showed differing emotions. Sometimes he cried, sometimes he was direct in his answers.

Joran also indicated that he was very sorry for his family and that he had the best contact with his father.

When I asked him why did he lie to his father about the Holiday Inn, Joran answered that he had disappointed his father in/with that.

Of this I reported on my oath as officer on June 17th 2005.


J. van der STRATEN

I don't see anything regarding a mental institution.

In Joran's words:

P. 156

Jacobs also says that he does not believe the Kalpoes, but believes Joran. "Since they are brothers, brothers stick together. They'll turn against you when it's in their benefit. what do you think is more important family or friends."

Joran became confused. He didn't know what happened to Natalee. He was in jail and was lying and now the Kalpoes are lying about him, so the only possibility is that they did something to the girl. Why would the Kalpoes speak badly about Joran when they said they did nothig bad to the girl.

Van der Straaten arrives and tells Joran that he "has known your father for years. I only want to help you. I am going to see to it that you can go to Holland, that you will not have to go to jail, but that you will be committed to a mental institution. You only have to tell the truth."


http://www.scrux.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=3065&highlight=mental#3065


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 05, 2007, 07:15:53 PM
   Who else could hide her body better from the polis THAN the polis!!!!

I'm pretty sure PVDS handled the body disposal.



Which time??


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on August 05, 2007, 07:17:48 PM
(http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a229/msdarthvada/monkey_skeleton.jpg)


here is the arm of a monkey....for comparison

Larger gap between radius and ulna, probably due to increased muscle mass/ weight bearing just a guess


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Rammstein on August 05, 2007, 07:18:30 PM
   They found Natalee, don't you all remember?  June of 2005.  There was an announcement,and confirmation...we saw Beth's crumpling body as she got the most tragic news of her life!!!!   But then, came the retraction!  What happened???? The body was not "presentable".....too much DNA.  It was "disappeared!!!!

I believe a lot of things but not this rumor. The wrong department/people told this. Remarks like this are the responsibility of the DA's office or the police, not by politicians or people from a ministry.
Didn't Dompig also announce this?

YES!!!!!!   It was not a RUMOR!!!!!!

Dompig was the one who said at that time that one of the suspects had said that something bad happened and the he was leading police to the scene, not that something had been discovered or that his words were actually true.

And seeing the lies and BS Dompig has been telling it may not be prudent to believe this man on his word (or any other official in this case  :wink: )


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 05, 2007, 07:18:40 PM
13th  Jan VDS records casual conversation with arrested suspect and offers him time in a mental institution (?? because of the horrid condition Natalee was found to be??).

this is what van der Straten wrote:
Quote
JORAN - JUNE 13TH 2005

Proces-verbaal findings

I, Jan van der STRATEN, police chief with the Aruban Police Corps, state the following.

On Monday June 13th 2005, at approximately 13.00 hours I spoke informally with the suspect Joran Andreas Petrus v/d SLOOT at the police station in Oranjestad.

On my question to Joran whether he can tell me what happened after the girl had fallen asleep on the beach near Fisherman's Hut, he answered:

“I called DEEPAK and he came with two dogs. I think he raped the girl and did something to her.”

To my question where the girl was buried then, he answered:
“I think that it was buried then next to the wall of the Fisherman's Hut, for the rest I would not know either.”

During the conversation Joran showed differing emotions. Sometimes he cried, sometimes he was direct in his answers.

Joran also indicated that he was very sorry for his family and that he had the best contact with his father.

When I asked him why did he lie to his father about the Holiday Inn, Joran answered that he had disappointed his father in/with that.

Of this I reported on my oath as officer on June 17th 2005.


J. van der STRATEN

I don't see anything regarding a mental institution.

Ramm - it's in Joran's book, Joran's words of what Jan van der Straten said to him.  It may not have been written down.


It was probably in the statement that was torn up on the desk.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Buckeye on August 05, 2007, 07:18:57 PM
Ramm

What if the announcement was made (they were happy)....but then....they got a good look at her....and she didn't look like she had wondered off from the beach.  What if they decided that night...or the big boss (whoever that may be) decided it was better to have no body than to have that body??


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Carnut on August 05, 2007, 07:20:06 PM
Chapter 11 of Joran's book from Scrux:

(snipped)

P. 156

Jacobs also says that he does not believe the Kalpoes, but believes Joran. "Since they are brothers, brothers stick together. They'll turn against you when it's in their benefit. what do you think is more important family or friends."

Joran became confused. He didn't know what happened to Natalee. He was in jail and was lying and now the Kalpoes are lying about him, so the only possibility is that they did something to the girl. Why would the Kalpoes speak badly about Joran when they said they did nothig bad to the girl.

Van der Straaten arrives and tells Joran that he "has known your father for years. I only want to help you. I am going to see to it that you can go to Holland, that you will not have to go to jail, but that you will be committed to a mental institution. You only have to tell the truth."

(snipped)


I sense more than a little bit of prejudice and some shifting of blame in this.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: MsVada on August 05, 2007, 07:21:13 PM
BB that is true,  I was thinking it was possible to still be a monkey if the picture was taken from a different angle.....And then we take into consideration the size proportions of the picture I found might be a larger primate than what was found.

I have another comparison picture with human arms.  I personally didn't think it was a human arm, but what do I know, I'm not an expert :smt102


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: SunFreak2 on August 05, 2007, 07:25:04 PM
Arm bone

There is a theory related to body proportions (sorta like the foot and forearm thing).  Phi is a relationship equal to 1.618.  Various body proportions are based on this number.  Studies using this info have found the forearm related to the forearm plus the hand to be in a proportion of 1.715.  The picture, in the paper, if adding a little for the finger out of view, is proportioned to 1.7.  I have no idea about monkey or donkey bone proportions.  By relationship, the arm bone could be human.  Wasn't there a plane wreck in Venz. at that time??

http://hypertextbook.com/facts/2006/bodyproportions.shtml
Yes,at least that's what we heard at the time when they found the bone there.

Aug 10 – Bone washes up on coast of Venezuela; found by dog walking with owner. Local (Venezuela) newspaper says it was a human humerus (arm bone) with hand/fingers. A later report from Aruba says it was part of a mannequin; in D. Holloway’s book, he says he was told it was a “Halloween prop.” Notes: This finding occurred during the turbulent storm season of 2005. Disastrous plane crash in Venezuela shortly after this finding.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on August 05, 2007, 07:26:03 PM
BB that is true,  I was thinking it was possible to still be a monkey if the picture was taken from a different angle.....And then we take into consideration the size proportions of the picture I found might be a larger primate than what was found.

I have another comparison picture with human arms.  I personally didn't think it was a human arm, but what do I know, I'm not an expert :smt102

Neither am I MsV :2doh: That picture of the washed up bone could be monkey, ape , human. I can't even make-out 5 fingers. If it were monkey and the 2 arm bones were "stuck" together .....who knows.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 05, 2007, 07:26:11 PM
13th  Jan VDS records casual conversation with arrested suspect and offers him time in a mental institution (?? because of the horrid condition Natalee was found to be??).

this is what van der Straten wrote:
Quote
JORAN - JUNE 13TH 2005

Proces-verbaal findings

I, Jan van der STRATEN, police chief with the Aruban Police Corps, state the following.

On Monday June 13th 2005, at approximately 13.00 hours I spoke informally with the suspect Joran Andreas Petrus v/d SLOOT at the police station in Oranjestad.

On my question to Joran whether he can tell me what happened after the girl had fallen asleep on the beach near Fisherman's Hut, he answered:

“I called DEEPAK and he came with two dogs. I think he raped the girl and did something to her.”

To my question where the girl was buried then, he answered:
“I think that it was buried then next to the wall of the Fisherman's Hut, for the rest I would not know either.”

During the conversation Joran showed differing emotions. Sometimes he cried, sometimes he was direct in his answers.

Joran also indicated that he was very sorry for his family and that he had the best contact with his father.

When I asked him why did he lie to his father about the Holiday Inn, Joran answered that he had disappointed his father in/with that.

Of this I reported on my oath as officer on June 17th 2005.


J. van der STRATEN

I don't see anything regarding a mental institution.
I think it was Joran who wrote that in his book...about the mental institution.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Carnut on August 05, 2007, 07:26:22 PM
Chapter 11 of Joran's book from Scrux:

(snipped)

P. 156

Jacobs also says that he does not believe the Kalpoes, but believes Joran. "Since they are brothers, brothers stick together. They'll turn against you when it's in their benefit. what do you think is more important family or friends."

Joran became confused. He didn't know what happened to Natalee. He was in jail and was lying and now the Kalpoes are lying about him, so the only possibility is that they did something to the girl. Why would the Kalpoes speak badly about Joran when they said they did nothig bad to the girl.

Van der Straaten arrives and tells Joran that he "has known your father for years. I only want to help you. I am going to see to it that you can go to Holland, that you will not have to go to jail, but that you will be committed to a mental institution. You only have to tell the truth."

(snipped)


I sense more than a little bit of prejudice and some shifting of blame in this.

On the other hand the Bolded part actually looks like it might have occured if one could believe that Van Der Stratton was really pursuing a case.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Rammstein on August 05, 2007, 07:26:59 PM
Chapter 11 of Joran's book from Scrux:

(snipped)

P. 156

Jacobs also says that he does not believe the Kalpoes, but believes Joran. "Since they are brothers, brothers stick together. They'll turn against you when it's in their benefit. what do you think is more important family or friends."

Joran became confused. He didn't know what happened to Natalee. He was in jail and was lying and now the Kalpoes are lying about him, so the only possibility is that they did something to the girl. Why would the Kalpoes speak badly about Joran when they said they did nothig bad to the girl.

Van der Straaten arrives and tells Joran that he "has known your father for years. I only want to help you. I am going to see to it that you can go to Holland, that you will not have to go to jail, but that you will be committed to a mental institution. You only have to tell the truth."

(snipped)


you are right, I just read it.

I know he was not in a position to make good on that promise. The only one able to decide that is the presiding three judges who will sit at Joran's trial in judgment of him.

Also Joran would have had to be found mentally ill in one of my countries mental institutions.

The police could however have advised him to be admitted for investigation of his mental capacities, however that would not be instead of jail time but as preparation for a trial.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 05, 2007, 07:29:05 PM
   They found Natalee, don't you all remember?  June of 2005.  There was an announcement,and confirmation...we saw Beth's crumpling body as she got the most tragic news of her life!!!!   But then, came the retraction!  What happened???? The body was not "presentable".....too much DNA.  It was "disappeared!!!!

I believe a lot of things but not this rumor. The wrong department/people told this. Remarks like this are the responsibility of the DA's office or the police, not by politicians or people from a ministry.
Didn't Dompig also announce this?

YES!!!!!!   It was not a RUMOR!!!!!!

I don't remember him ever saying such a thing. Especially not as it was him that came with the anonymous witness that knew the location and it was him that got the specialized dog teams from the KLPD to come and look for her body. If he had already said she had been found then he would not have needed to do this and he would certainly have been asked by the media to explain why he was not looking for a body if he had already pronounced that she had been found?
I believe it was Dompig who stated this....I'll look for the link.
:)


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Rammstein on August 05, 2007, 07:29:23 PM
Ramm

What if the announcement was made (they were happy)....but then....they got a good look at her....and she didn't look like she had wondered off from the beach.  What if they decided that night...or the big boss (whoever that may be) decided it was better to have no body than to have that body??

the media would have swarmed to that place and images of a van or people digging would have been likely to have been shot by the media.

Again, I cannot for 100% say that she is not on the island but I would think she was brought out to sea that first night and sunk there. Maybe that is why the authorities are that slow in approving sea searches.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on August 05, 2007, 07:29:30 PM
Rammstein wrote;
Quote
I know he was not in a position to make good on that promise. The only one able to decide that is the presiding three judges who will sit at Joran's trial in judgment of him.

Also Joran would have had to be found mentally ill in one of my countries mental institutions.

The police could however have advised him to be admitted for investigation of his mental capacities, however that would not be instead of jail time but as preparation for a trial.

Anyway you look at that advice, it is not advice you would give someone who simply left a girl sleeping on the beach.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 05, 2007, 07:30:19 PM
Ramm... what is the level to prove that he needs mental help? I mean is the threshhold high or is it low??


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Rammstein on August 05, 2007, 07:32:19 PM
   They found Natalee, don't you all remember?  June of 2005.  There was an announcement,and confirmation...we saw Beth's crumpling body as she got the most tragic news of her life!!!!   But then, came the retraction!  What happened???? The body was not "presentable".....too much DNA.  It was "disappeared!!!!

I believe a lot of things but not this rumor. The wrong department/people told this. Remarks like this are the responsibility of the DA's office or the police, not by politicians or people from a ministry.
Didn't Dompig also announce this?

YES!!!!!!   It was not a RUMOR!!!!!!

I don't remember him ever saying such a thing. Especially not as it was him that came with the anonymous witness that knew the location and it was him that got the specialized dog teams from the KLPD to come and look for her body. If he had already said she had been found then he would not have needed to do this and he would certainly have been asked by the media to explain why he was not looking for a body if he had already pronounced that she had been found?
I believe it was Dompig who stated this....I'll look for the link.
:)


David Cruz, a spokesman for the Aruban Minister of Justice (search) told FOX News Natalee Holloway (search), who was on vacation with friends with a graduation trip when she disappeared, was confirmed dead and that authorities knew the location of her body.

However, Cruz later retracted the statement, saying he was a victim of a "misinformation campaign."

The mother of the 18-year-old told FOX News authorities had not yet contacted them with this information but did say that Natalee's father, who is divorced from her mother, was with investigators looking for the body.

These reports came after significant, and at times conflicting, developments with the five suspects being detained in the case.

One of the young men detained admitted "something bad happened" to the woman after they took her to the beach, a police officer said, while prosecutors said the investigation was at a crucial point.

But prosecutors refused to comment on the statement by Deputy Police Commissioner Gerold Dompig (search), who told The Associated Press that the man who made that admission was leading police to the scene. He refused to identify which of the three young men who took Holloway to a northern beach the night she went missing made the statement.


http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,159252,00.html


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 05, 2007, 07:32:19 PM
Rammstein wrote;
Quote
I know he was not in a position to make good on that promise. The only one able to decide that is the presiding three judges who will sit at Joran's trial in judgment of him.

Also Joran would have had to be found mentally ill in one of my countries mental institutions.

The police could however have advised him to be admitted for investigation of his mental capacities, however that would not be instead of jail time but as preparation for a trial.

Anyway you look at that advice, it is not advice you would give someone who simply left a girl sleeping on the beach.

Exactly


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Buckeye on August 05, 2007, 07:32:26 PM
Ramm

He was seeing a mental health professional before his arrest.  Who knows what the diagnosis is.  Being a minor, with a legal father, I am sure the judges would have listened to JVDS wishes if it meant solving the case.  Maybe the judges had already suggested it to JVDS.  :2doh:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 05, 2007, 07:32:54 PM
Ramm

What if the announcement was made (they were happy)....but then....they got a good look at her....and she didn't look like she had wondered off from the beach.  What if they decided that night...or the big boss (whoever that may be) decided it was better to have no body than to have that body??
Hmmmm,yes,and what if they were afraid of whose DNA would be on her body....like maybe Paulus's?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Buckeye on August 05, 2007, 07:36:55 PM
Ramm

What if the announcement was made (they were happy)....but then....they got a good look at her....and she didn't look like she had wondered off from the beach.  What if they decided that night...or the big boss (whoever that may be) decided it was better to have no body than to have that body??
Hmmmm,yes,and what if they were afraid of whose DNA would be on her body....like maybe Paulus's?

 :smt045 :smt045 :smt045


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Destiny on August 05, 2007, 07:37:32 PM
Ramm

What if the announcement was made (they were happy)....but then....they got a good look at her....and she didn't look like she had wondered off from the beach.  What if they decided that night...or the big boss (whoever that may be) decided it was better to have no body than to have that body??
Hmmmm,yes,and what if they were afraid of whose DNA would be on her body....like maybe Paulus's?

BINGO!

Destiny


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 05, 2007, 07:39:02 PM
   They found Natalee, don't you all remember?  June of 2005.  There was an announcement,and confirmation...we saw Beth's crumpling body as she got the most tragic news of her life!!!!   But then, came the retraction!  What happened???? The body was not "presentable".....too much DNA.  It was "disappeared!!!!

I believe a lot of things but not this rumor. The wrong department/people told this. Remarks like this are the responsibility of the DA's office or the police, not by politicians or people from a ministry.
Didn't Dompig also announce this?

YES!!!!!!   It was not a RUMOR!!!!!!

I don't remember him ever saying such a thing. Especially not as it was him that came with the anonymous witness that knew the location and it was him that got the specialized dog teams from the KLPD to come and look for her body. If he had already said she had been found then he would not have needed to do this and he would certainly have been asked by the media to explain why he was not looking for a body if he had already pronounced that she had been found?
I believe it was Dompig who stated this....I'll look for the link.
:)


David Cruz, a spokesman for the Aruban Minister of Justice (search) told FOX News Natalee Holloway (search), who was on vacation with friends with a graduation trip when she disappeared, was confirmed dead and that authorities knew the location of her body.

However, Cruz later retracted the statement, saying he was a victim of a "misinformation campaign."

The mother of the 18-year-old told FOX News authorities had not yet contacted them with this information but did say that Natalee's father, who is divorced from her mother, was with investigators looking for the body.

These reports came after significant, and at times conflicting, developments with the five suspects being detained in the case.

One of the young men detained admitted "something bad happened" to the woman after they took her to the beach, a police officer said, while prosecutors said the investigation was at a crucial point.

But prosecutors refused to comment on the statement by Deputy Police Commissioner Gerold Dompig (search), who told The Associated Press that the man who made that admission was leading police to the scene. He refused to identify which of the three young men who took Holloway to a northern beach the night she went missing made the statement.


http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,159252,00.html
OK,does that not prove that Dompig stated that?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: SunFreak2 on August 05, 2007, 07:40:48 PM
   They found Natalee, don't you all remember?  June of 2005.  There was an announcement,and confirmation...we saw Beth's crumpling body as she got the most tragic news of her life!!!!   But then, came the retraction!  What happened???? The body was not "presentable".....too much DNA.  It was "disappeared!!!!

I believe a lot of things but not this rumor. The wrong department/people told this. Remarks like this are the responsibility of the DA's office or the police, not by politicians or people from a ministry.
Didn't Dompig also announce this?

YES!!!!!!   It was not a RUMOR!!!!!!

I don't remember him ever saying such a thing. Especially not as it was him that came with the anonymous witness that knew the location and it was him that got the specialized dog teams from the KLPD to come and look for her body. If he had already said she had been found then he would not have needed to do this and he would certainly have been asked by the media to explain why he was not looking for a body if he had already pronounced that she had been found?
I believe it was Dompig who stated this....I'll look for the link.
:)


June 10  - Late that evening FOX News, AP and CNN reported that Dompig and Edward Croes stated that one of the arrested suspects had confessed, and police were being taken to a crime scene. DOMPIG also stated that one of the persons in custody had stated  "that something bad happened to NATALEE.”  Shortly after that statement became public, a press conference was held in which one senior government official made no reference to the Assistant Commissioner's statement, choosing rather, to say that the authorities were at a critical juncture in the investigations.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Buckeye on August 05, 2007, 07:41:48 PM
Ramm

The info was leaked by the police.  Say what you want about the US media, but they do try to confirm a lead.  They chose the Justice Ministry (maybe there was no answer at the OM office). No matter how it happened....it was not made up...it was real.  You believe misinformation, I believe true information retracted.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Rammstein on August 05, 2007, 07:47:05 PM
Ramm... what is the level to prove that he needs mental help? I mean is the threshhold high or is it low??

this is something I found regarding the Pieter Baan Centrum (mental facility)

In Dutch criminal cases in which doubts arise about the defendant's mental health, a forensic assessment will be requested. This is provided either by the multidisciplinary staff of residential clinics who conduct forensic evaluations for the court, or by mental health professionals contracted on a part-time basis by district courts. This article discusses the procedures applied in such cases as well as the relevant legal provisions. It focuses particularly on the clinical observation, evaluation, and reporting that is carried out over a number of weeks in the residential setting of the Pieter Baan Centrum. Specific attention is paid to procedures applied in this clinic. It is suggested that Dutch procedures for the use of mental health expertise can best be characterized by three aspects: multidisciplinary observation and reporting, the use of a sliding scale for indicating degree of responsibility, and, finally, the involvement and payment of experts by the state as such, rather than by the prosecution and/or the defense.


the entire discussion/article can be purchased for 25$ but I am not going to do that if you don't mind  :wink:

But as it says here a suspect is sent (almost always by the judge as preparation for the trial) and kept for several weeks to assess his mental health and his degree of responsibility.

But even if he had been found to be mentally ill that would have been even worse in his case.

For manslaughter (which is what he would have been guilty off) he would have gotten 8 to 12 years (as a rule) and would have been out in 6 to 8 years or so. As a mental deficient offender he would have been sentenced to 6 to 8 years with TBS and mandatory treatment which usually means he would be locked up for 10 years or longer (he could even be kept in for forever).

Even if it had been unintentional manslaughter with TBS he would face much longer behind bars that if he would have confessed and taken his punishment.

The threshold is very high and is in degrees, but TBS is something every convict wants to avoid as it can be a life sentence.

I know of one case in which a pedophile was arrested for some perverted act that would have cost him a few years in jail, instead he got TBS and has been incarcerated for I believe more than 40 years.

As said, TBS can last for forever. If they deem you uncurable then you will never be released, ever.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Rammstein on August 05, 2007, 07:48:34 PM
Rammstein wrote;
Quote
I know he was not in a position to make good on that promise. The only one able to decide that is the presiding three judges who will sit at Joran's trial in judgment of him.

Also Joran would have had to be found mentally ill in one of my countries mental institutions.

The police could however have advised him to be admitted for investigation of his mental capacities, however that would not be instead of jail time but as preparation for a trial.

Anyway you look at that advice, it is not advice you would give someone who simply left a girl sleeping on the beach.

Exactly

I agree, it would either be to trick him to either betray his own involvement in Natalee's death or the Kalpoes.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on August 05, 2007, 07:51:40 PM
O/T here we have talked about ways of getting pedophiles off the street here so that they don't commit another crime. As they are technically incurable many would agree, maybe that is a way.......TBS .


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 05, 2007, 07:52:10 PM
Thanks Ramm!!!  Interesting... it would be better for us, in this case if he were held in an mental capacity....

Did you see the Jensen show? 


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Rammstein on August 05, 2007, 07:52:31 PM
Ramm

The info was leaked by the police.  Say what you want about the US media, but they do try to confirm a lead.  They chose the Justice Ministry (maybe there was no answer at the OM office). No matter how it happened....it was not made up...it was real.  You believe misinformation, I believe true information retracted.

both opinions have some valid points, both are at least more believable than the Ref. opinions on where Natalee is  :wink:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: SunFreak2 on August 05, 2007, 07:52:45 PM
On June 10 - a body was recovered at the Arubay rocks.  Aruba says a 7 year old boy was recovered the year before.  I say it was Natalee.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 05, 2007, 07:53:45 PM
O/T here we have talked about ways of getting pedophiles off the street here so that they don't commit another crime. As they are technically incurable many would agree, maybe that is a way.......TBS .

I had that thought too... now to get the stupid politicans and judges to implement it...


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Rammstein on August 05, 2007, 08:04:13 PM
Example:

83 year old pedophile was deemed to old/phycically to be jailed or locked in a mental facility. Thus he was convicted to be forcibly treated by a shrink, forced to take meds to suppress his tendencies and he is followed by satellite tracking 24/7 and is banned from places where children come (like parks, schools etc.) and when he comes within the vicinity of such a place then the local police is automatically alerted to this.

Example 2:

a 64 year old man has been in TBS since he accosted an 11 year old girl when he was 17. During trial leave he suspected to have done the same to a 6 year old girl. After that he was deemed untreatable and his been in TBS for 47 year


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 05, 2007, 08:05:26 PM
Example:

83 year old pedophile was deemed to old/phycically to be jailed or locked in a mental facility. Thus he was convicted to be forcibly treated by a shrink, forced to take meds to suppress his tendencies and he is followed by satellite tracking 24/7 and is banned from places where children come (like parks, schools etc.) and when he comes within the vicinity of such a place then the local police is automatically alerted to this.

Example 2:

a 64 year old man has been in TBS since he accosted an 11 year old girl when he was 17. During trial leave he suspected to have done the same to a 6 year old girl. After that he was deemed untreatable and his been in TBS for 47 year

I like this system.... seems like it works.  How do we get our politicans to do this :-?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 05, 2007, 08:07:28 PM
On June 10 - a body was recovered at the Arubay rocks.  Aruba says a 7 year old boy was recovered the year before.  I say it was Natalee.


I believe she was moved several times after death (sorry  :sad:...it sickens me to even think it). I do believe she WAS at the rocks at some point. Her resting place now.....the depths of the ocean. Tim and crew will find her.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Buckeye on August 05, 2007, 08:08:41 PM
Example:

83 year old pedophile was deemed to old/phycically to be jailed or locked in a mental facility. Thus he was convicted to be forcibly treated by a shrink, forced to take meds to suppress his tendencies and he is followed by satellite tracking 24/7 and is banned from places where children come (like parks, schools etc.) and when he comes within the vicinity of such a place then the local police is automatically alerted to this.

Example 2:

a 64 year old man has been in TBS since he accosted an 11 year old girl when he was 17. During trial leave he suspected to have done the same to a 6 year old girl. After that he was deemed untreatable and his been in TBS for 47 year

Maybe that's why PVDS said no deal ...just be quiet Joran...????


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Buckeye on August 05, 2007, 08:09:45 PM
On June 10 - a body was recovered at the Arubay rocks.  Aruba says a 7 year old boy was recovered the year before.  I say it was Natalee.


I believe she was moved several times after death (sorry  :sad:...it sickens me to even think it). I do believe she WAS at the rocks at some point. Her resting place now.....the depths of the ocean. Tim and crew will find her.

 :smt045 :smt045 :smt045


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: GrannyToad on August 05, 2007, 08:10:18 PM
(http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a229/msdarthvada/monkey_skeleton.jpg)


here is the arm of a monkey....for comparison

Larger gap between radius and ulna, probably due to increased muscle mass/ weight bearing just a guess

-A- monkey. That's another good image, though.

Not all primates are the same, structures differ between species. Turn that a bit on its side an it may appear different. Again, compare fingers (phalanges) with those of the human, especially the thumb.

I did this stuff some back at university but not much with other primates. I still have a comparative bone collection around here for some other vertebrates.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Buckeye on August 05, 2007, 08:12:41 PM
Granny

So, does this mean you believe the Venz. bone to be more primate than human??


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: SunFreak2 on August 05, 2007, 08:14:18 PM
(http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a229/msdarthvada/monkey_skeleton.jpg)


here is the arm of a monkey....for comparison

Larger gap between radius and ulna, probably due to increased muscle mass/ weight bearing just a guess

-A- monkey. That's another good image, though.

Not all primates are the same, structures differ between species. Turn that a bit on its side an it may appear different. Again, compare fingers (phalanges) with those of the human, especially the thumb.

I did this stuff some back at university but not much with other primates. I still have a comparative bone collection around here for some other vertebrates.


Thanks, GT.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Buckeye on August 05, 2007, 08:15:24 PM
Did anyone on the island let MF know that Lorenzo's been released??  I feel sorry for him.  He has such a following.  Maybe Destiny can give him her contact info.  :lol: :lol:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 05, 2007, 08:18:54 PM
Did anyone on the island let MF know that Lorenzo's been released??  I feel sorry for him.  He has such a following.  Maybe Destiny can give him her contact info.  :lol: :lol:
:smt040 HAHAHAAAAAA!! Good one, lol.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Rammstein on August 05, 2007, 08:19:15 PM
Example:

83 year old pedophile was deemed to old/phycically to be jailed or locked in a mental facility. Thus he was convicted to be forcibly treated by a shrink, forced to take meds to suppress his tendencies and he is followed by satellite tracking 24/7 and is banned from places where children come (like parks, schools etc.) and when he comes within the vicinity of such a place then the local police is automatically alerted to this.

Example 2:

a 64 year old man has been in TBS since he accosted an 11 year old girl when he was 17. During trial leave he suspected to have done the same to a 6 year old girl. After that he was deemed untreatable and his been in TBS for 47 year

I like this system.... seems like it works.  How do we get our politicans to do this :-?

oh it is not perfect, it needs constant vigilance to make it as safe as possible. And sometimes things go wrong, but that is a small number of cases. Most who are treatable will go through full treatment, leave with supervision, leave without supervision, off site housing with supervision to off site housing without 24/7 supervision to when the treatment is final to unsupervised living. A process that takes many years to complete (and if you combine this with the risk of being deemed untreatable, you can understand why criminals dislike getting TBS).


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Buckeye on August 05, 2007, 08:20:40 PM
O/T to Ramm

Was reading up on Dutch attitude regarding transport of drugs (swallowing cocaine balls etc).  It said, the feeling was that poor people are the carriers and the goal is the shipper himself.  They don't arrest the carrier (the jails would fill up) but record his info (so he can't carry again) and send him back. Article said it has put a big dent into the shippers.  Is this true??


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: SunFreak2 on August 05, 2007, 08:23:18 PM
Interesting discussions and I hate to leave......but, g'nite everyone.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Destiny on August 05, 2007, 08:24:53 PM
Did anyone on the island let MF know that Lorenzo's been released??  I feel sorry for him.  He has such a following.  Maybe Destiny can give him her contact info.  :lol: :lol:

BadBaaaaaaaaddBBBaaaaaaaaaaad Buckeye!

BTW. when I called Aruba 2day...I did not in any way mention the case, nor anyone involved, nor our SM site.

Way back when, I was putting myself through school, I worked as an assistant to a PI...learned a lot from him I did ;-)

Destiny


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 05, 2007, 08:26:03 PM
Interesting discussions and I hate to leave......but, g'nite everyone.
Sweet,smishy dreams SF.
:)


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Destiny on August 05, 2007, 08:27:55 PM
Interesting discussions and I hate to leave......but, g'nite everyone.
Sweet,smishy dreams SF.
:)


Nite SunFreak ;-)


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Rammstein on August 05, 2007, 08:33:45 PM
O/T to Ramm

Was reading up on Dutch attitude regarding transport of drugs (swallowing cocaine balls etc).  It said, the feeling was that poor people are the carriers and the goal is the shipper himself.  They don't arrest the carrier (the jails would fill up) but record his info (so he can't carry again) and send him back. Article said it has put a big dent into the shippers.  Is this true??

that was the rule because else it would have over-crowded our jail-system but that exception ended earlier this year. Now mules who are caught at Schiphol airport will face jailtimes just like any other drugsmule captured.

However, since the 100% checks from most drugs-exporting countries was introduced (all passengers of destinations known for drugsmules are subjected to a internal body scan, immediately revealing their drugs) the numbers of mules risking Schiphol as an entry port has dropped considerably (unfortunately they will be using less advanced airports elsewhere in Europe meaning the filthy drugs still get into the EU despite our best efforts).


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Carnut on August 05, 2007, 08:34:30 PM
Did anyone on the island let MF know that Lorenzo's been released??  I feel sorry for him.  He has such a following.  Maybe Destiny can give him her contact info.  :lol: :lol:

BadBaaaaaaaaddBBBaaaaaaaaaaad Buckeye!

BTW. when I called Aruba 2day...I did not in any way mention the case, nor anyone involved, nor our SM site.

Way back when, I was putting myself through school, I worked as an assistant to a PI...learned a lot from him I did ;-)

Destiny

Now call the KLPD and find out whats going on.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: GrannyToad on August 05, 2007, 08:35:43 PM
Rammstein wrote;
Quote
I know he was not in a position to make good on that promise. The only one able to decide that is the presiding three judges who will sit at Joran's trial in judgment of him.

Also Joran would have had to be found mentally ill in one of my countries mental institutions.

The police could however have advised him to be admitted for investigation of his mental capacities, however that would not be instead of jail time but as preparation for a trial.

Anyway you look at that advice, it is not advice you would give someone who simply left a girl sleeping on the beach.

Isn't Ramm suggesting that vdStraaten sort of offered Joran the opportunity to have a psychiatric evaluation before any trial? I know Dutch law differs procedurally but that's how it might have gone in US/common law.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Buckeye on August 05, 2007, 08:38:06 PM
O/T to Ramm

Was reading up on Dutch attitude regarding transport of drugs (swallowing cocaine balls etc).  It said, the feeling was that poor people are the carriers and the goal is the shipper himself.  They don't arrest the carrier (the jails would fill up) but record his info (so he can't carry again) and send him back. Article said it has put a big dent into the shippers.  Is this true??

that was the rule because else it would have over-crowded our jail-system but that exception ended earlier this year. Now mules who are caught at Schiphol airport will face jailtimes just like any other drugsmule captured.

However, since the 100% checks from most drugs-exporting countries was introduced (all passengers of destinations known for drugsmules are subjected to a internal body scan, immediately revealing their drugs) the numbers of mules risking Schiphol as an entry port has dropped considerably (unfortunately they will be using less advanced airports elsewhere in Europe meaning the filthy drugs still get into the EU despite our best efforts).

Thanks..interesting...


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Kat_Gram on August 05, 2007, 08:40:46 PM
Greetings to Rammenstein and to Carnut ! !
I can't stay, but peeked in and saw that Carnut was here and that Ramm had joined.  :D :D :D


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Destiny on August 05, 2007, 08:41:03 PM
Did anyone on the island let MF know that Lorenzo's been released??  I feel sorry for him.  He has such a following.  Maybe Destiny can give him her contact info.  :lol: :lol:

BadBaaaaaaaaddBBBaaaaaaaaaaad Buckeye!

BTW. when I called Aruba 2day...I did not in any way mention the case, nor anyone involved, nor our SM site.

Way back when, I was putting myself through school, I worked as an assistant to a PI...learned a lot from him I did ;-)

Destiny

Now call the KLPD and find out whats going on.

I tried....see below


Dear A Gasmi,

Thank You for your kind reply.

The reason I am writing to you, is that all over the news/media in Aruba and The Nederlands, is the story that Natalee Holloway is alive, and was kidnapped by her Parents.

Please, as the Forensisch Instituut, Ministerie van Justitie that has investigated this case. could you tell me of there is any truth to these stories?

Or, do you have forensisch evidence that Miss Holloway is dead.

Thank You again for your most kind reply.

Sincerely,

XXXXXXX

U.S.A

> Dear Madame,
>
> Our institute has indeed provided help in this case. For further
> information about this case I can refer you to the Ministery of Justice
> in Aruba.
> Kind regards,
>
> A.Gasmi
> NFI
> Communications
>
>
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Verzonden: woensdag 6 juni 2007 20:44
> Aan: Info
> Onderwerp: Require infomation Please
>
> Is your Institute the one that has provided help in Aruba regarding the
> Natalee Holloway case?
>
>
> Thank You in advance for your reply,
>
> Sincerely,
>
> XXXXXXXXX
>
> U.S.A.
>

>



Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Buckeye on August 05, 2007, 08:43:36 PM
Maybe Victor/Lazlo will sign up and post. :smt102


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Rammstein on August 05, 2007, 08:44:48 PM
Did anyone on the island let MF know that Lorenzo's been released??  I feel sorry for him.  He has such a following.  Maybe Destiny can give him her contact info.  :lol: :lol:

BadBaaaaaaaaddBBBaaaaaaaaaaad Buckeye!

BTW. when I called Aruba 2day...I did not in any way mention the case, nor anyone involved, nor our SM site.

Way back when, I was putting myself through school, I worked as an assistant to a PI...learned a lot from him I did ;-)

Destiny

Now call the KLPD and find out whats going on.

unfortunately the KLPD has not say over Aruban criminal cases like the one from Lorenzo. He was arrested on Aruban drugs offenses charges and his release was either by order of a judge or most likely by order of the DA. The ALE also has no say over who gets released from jail (at least not when the DA has been notified of said arrest).


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Destiny on August 05, 2007, 08:44:51 PM
Maybe Victor/Lazlo will sign up and post. :smt102

I would like that!

Dest


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Rammstein on August 05, 2007, 08:46:04 PM
Rammstein wrote;
Quote
I know he was not in a position to make good on that promise. The only one able to decide that is the presiding three judges who will sit at Joran's trial in judgment of him.

Also Joran would have had to be found mentally ill in one of my countries mental institutions.

The police could however have advised him to be admitted for investigation of his mental capacities, however that would not be instead of jail time but as preparation for a trial.

Anyway you look at that advice, it is not advice you would give someone who simply left a girl sleeping on the beach.

Isn't Ramm suggesting that vdStraaten sort of offered Joran the opportunity to have a psychiatric evaluation before any trial? I know Dutch law differs procedurally but that's how it might have gone in US/common law.

yes, but it is not legal or binding in our legal system. A DA may request such an investigation into mental health but a judge has to OK it before it takes place.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Buckeye on August 05, 2007, 08:48:40 PM
Ramm

Isn't there some big drug initiative involving cooperation between Aruba, the Dutch and others (?US)?  Wouldn't this give KLPD some say??  Weren't they there during the "take down"?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: tcumom on August 05, 2007, 08:50:38 PM


... but I am so lonely.  Chatting is not my thing. I get sooo confused.  By the time I compose my thoughts ... type them out ... the topic has changed.  On the forum ... the same thing happens but ... I can quote so that others know what the heck I am talking about.  I know that I am always behind but ... that is the story of my life.  I have gotten use to it.   :

Janet

7:00 PM

I hope I am not missing some good stuff ...
Janet ~ I'm 24 hours behind on this thread . . . I hear ya about the chat . . . . I can't even keep up with the forum when I attempt to reply.  :-? :-?
Funny, we were doing the Scrabble thing last night, too . . .  :D :D


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 05, 2007, 08:52:01 PM
Nite SUn....


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Rammstein on August 05, 2007, 08:52:50 PM
Ramm

Isn't there some big drug initiative involving cooperation between Aruba, the Dutch and others (?US)?  Wouldn't this give KLPD some say??  Weren't they there during the "take down"?

No, in our legal system it is the DA who leads investigations and the police serves him in his investigations, not the other way around.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Buckeye on August 05, 2007, 08:57:52 PM
Ramm

Isn't there some big drug initiative involving cooperation between Aruba, the Dutch and others (?US)?  Wouldn't this give KLPD some say??  Weren't they there during the "take down"?

No, in our legal system it is the DA who leads investigations and the police serves him in his investigations, not the other way around.

If there is an international or multinational agreement, between the heads of state, wouldn't the DA have to encourage cooperation between groups...even if they didn't want to?? Who gives the "marching orders" to the DA??


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Destiny on August 05, 2007, 09:00:22 PM
Ramm

Isn't there some big drug initiative involving cooperation between Aruba, the Dutch and others (?US)?  Wouldn't this give KLPD some say??  Weren't they there during the "take down"?

No, in our legal system it is the DA who leads investigations and the police serves him in his investigations, not the other way around.

If there is an international or multinational agreement, between the heads of state, wouldn't the DA have to encourage cooperation between groups...even if they didn't want to?? Who gives the "marching orders" to the DA??

The Elders '-)

Dest


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Buckeye on August 05, 2007, 09:02:33 PM
Ramm

Isn't there some big drug initiative involving cooperation between Aruba, the Dutch and others (?US)?  Wouldn't this give KLPD some say??  Weren't they there during the "take down"?

No, in our legal system it is the DA who leads investigations and the police serves him in his investigations, not the other way around.

If there is an international or multinational agreement, between the heads of state, wouldn't the DA have to encourage cooperation between groups...even if they didn't want to?? Who gives the "marching orders" to the DA??

The Elders '-)

Dest

Shhhhh..I was sneaking that one in.....


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Destiny on August 05, 2007, 09:04:07 PM
Ramm

Isn't there some big drug initiative involving cooperation between Aruba, the Dutch and others (?US)?  Wouldn't this give KLPD some say??  Weren't they there during the "take down"?

No, in our legal system it is the DA who leads investigations and the police serves him in his investigations, not the other way around.

If there is an international or multinational agreement, between the heads of state, wouldn't the DA have to encourage cooperation between groups...even if they didn't want to?? Who gives the "marching orders" to the DA??

The Elders '-)

Dest

Shhhhh..I was sneaking that one in.....

otay....shhhhhhhhhhhh

DEST


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: fran on August 05, 2007, 09:06:43 PM
On 6-11 Aruban police commissioner van der Straaten was asked by a Dutch journalist if he had any hopes for a positive outcome? Van der Straaten replied, “You always have to be hopeful, but I don’t believe anymore that we will find Natalee alive.” When asked why not, van der Straaten replied, “Because I know the details of the investigation and you don't!”

I believe this is when they realized she was dead and started calling it a homicide instead of a missing person.

1.The three suspects were arrested on June 9, 2005
2.The confession was on June 10, 2005
3.Chicago videos of suspicious activity out by the lighthouse area.
4.The announcement of the confession was on June 10, 2005, by Unid'd ALE officer, Dompig, and spokesman for PM, all told to U.S. MSM separately.
5.The PM got on Dutch radio night of June 10, 2005, 'said if something bad happened to Natalee Holloway in Aruba, it would be bad for tourism."
6.The retraction of the announcement was on June 11, 2005.
7.The retraction of the announcement was the same day as Van der Stratton made this statement, 'Because I know the details of the investigation and you don't.'
8.The last of the 'available' Chicago videos, the painting of the rocks.

Sorry, hate to post and run, while I'm also way behind in the conversation, but couldn't help myself. :D

fran


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: San on August 05, 2007, 09:06:50 PM
Did anyone on the island let MF know that Lorenzo's been released??  I feel sorry for him.  He has such a following.  Maybe Destiny can give him her contact info.  :lol: :lol:

BadBaaaaaaaaddBBBaaaaaaaaaaad Buckeye!

BTW. when I called Aruba 2day...I did not in any way mention the case, nor anyone involved, nor our SM site.

Way back when, I was putting myself through school, I worked as an assistant to a PI...learned a lot from him I did ;-)

Destiny

Now call the KLPD and find out whats going on.

unfortunately the KLPD has not say over Aruban criminal cases like the one from Lorenzo. He was arrested on Aruban drugs offenses charges and his release was either by order of a judge or most likely by order of the DA. The ALE also has no say over who gets released from jail (at least not when the DA has been notified of said arrest).

Would this apply for Natalee's case also?  Why are they investigating the case if they have no say in the case.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: GrannyToad on August 05, 2007, 09:07:14 PM
Granny

So, does this mean you believe the Venz. bone to be more primate than human??

What I see in that image appears to be a monkey's hand, radius & ulna. Laid on that newspaper, at a guess it's good-sized, so maybe a howler monkey.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Buckeye on August 05, 2007, 09:09:24 PM
Granny

So, does this mean you believe the Venz. bone to be more primate than human??

What I see in that image appears to be a monkey's hand, radius & ulna. Laid on that newspaper, at a guess it's good-sized, so maybe a howler monkey.

Thanks.  I will now quit worrying about it.  :wink:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Destiny on August 05, 2007, 09:10:08 PM
Did anyone on the island let MF know that Lorenzo's been released??  I feel sorry for him.  He has such a following.  Maybe Destiny can give him her contact info.  :lol: :lol:

BadBaaaaaaaaddBBBaaaaaaaaaaad Buckeye!

BTW. when I called Aruba 2day...I did not in any way mention the case, nor anyone involved, nor our SM site.

Way back when, I was putting myself through school, I worked as an assistant to a PI...learned a lot from him I did ;-)

Destiny

Now call the KLPD and find out whats going on.

unfortunately the KLPD has not say over Aruban criminal cases like the one from Lorenzo. He was arrested on Aruban drugs offenses charges and his release was either by order of a judge or most likely by order of the DA. The ALE also has no say over who gets released from jail (at least not when the DA has been notified of said arrest).

Would this apply for Natalee's case also?  Why are they investigating the case if they have no say in the case.

Yeah....what San Said....

Dest


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 05, 2007, 09:10:38 PM
Granny

So, does this mean you believe the Venz. bone to be more primate than human??

What I see in that image appears to be a monkey's hand, radius & ulna. Laid on that newspaper, at a guess it's good-sized, so maybe a howler monkey.

thanks Granny... that answers that.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Rammstein on August 05, 2007, 09:11:27 PM
Would this apply for Natalee's case also?  Why are they investigating the case if they have no say in the case.

because they were asked to do so by the Aruban Ministry of Justice. However, the DA of Aruba is still the one who is in charge of the investigation.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Buckeye on August 05, 2007, 09:13:25 PM
Ramm

If there is an international or multinational agreement, between the heads of state, wouldn't the DA have to encourage cooperation between groups...even if they didn't want to?? Who gives the "marching orders" to the DA??


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Destiny on August 05, 2007, 09:15:23 PM
Would this apply for Natalee's case also?  Why are they investigating the case if they have no say in the case.

because they were asked to do so by the Aruban Ministry of Justice. However, the DA of Aruba is still the one who is in charge of the investigation.

And the circle it goes round and round...come on everyone sing along with me.....this whole case is so frustrating.

Dest


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: IndyDan on August 05, 2007, 09:15:53 PM
   Who else could hide her body better from the polis THAN the polis!!!!

I'm pretty sure PVDS handled the body disposal.
I do agree


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on August 05, 2007, 09:16:26 PM
Granny

So, does this mean you believe the Venz. bone to be more primate than human??

What I see in that image appears to be a monkey's hand, radius & ulna. Laid on that newspaper, at a guess it's good-sized, so maybe a howler monkey.

I don't disagree Granny. I am just wondering how you were able to decide this?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: San on August 05, 2007, 09:21:58 PM
Would this apply for Natalee's case also?  Why are they investigating the case if they have no say in the case.

because they were asked to do so by the Aruban Ministry of Justice. However, the DA of Aruba is still the one who is in charge of the investigation.

Yes I remember that Rudy Croes requested their help but what good is their help if the Aruban Prosecutor doesn't want to prosecute this case.  When all is said and done it is the prosecutor who calls the shots and we are back to square one.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 05, 2007, 09:27:49 PM
Ramm - is there any possibility that the Netherlands could put pressure on the DA to bring it to trial? 


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Rammstein on August 05, 2007, 09:29:24 PM
Ramm

If there is an international or multinational agreement, between the heads of state, wouldn't the DA have to encourage cooperation between groups...even if they didn't want to?? Who gives the "marching orders" to the DA??

actually no, the DA would be in charge of those foreign officers. There are rules and regulations regarding international cooperation but they are based on in which country the combined effort takes place. And during those operations dutch law must not be broken to obtain the result the officers are striving for.

There is a boss in the DA's office which hands out the assignments but most cases like these are handled by the "Nationaal Parket" which is a division inside the DA department solely responsible for matters like "organized crime", "international crime" and terrorism.

The head of the Nationaal Parket is mr. A.J.A.M. Nieuwenhuizen

The head of the Aruban department is the Procureur Generaal Croes-Fernandes Pedra


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Rammstein on August 05, 2007, 09:30:57 PM
Ramm - is there any possibility that the Netherlands could put pressure on the DA to bring it to trial? 

no, the DA is independent precisely to avoid politicians pressuring them for politically based prosecutions.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 05, 2007, 09:43:25 PM
Ramm - is there any possibility that the Netherlands could put pressure on the DA to bring it to trial? 

no, the DA is independent precisely to avoid politicians pressuring them for politically based prosecutions.
Darn - thanks Ramm


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Buckeye on August 05, 2007, 09:52:38 PM
Ramm

Let's say, for whatever reason (sleeping with a suspect; bribed...), the DA is crooked.  What recourse does the country have??  Where is the "checks and balances" on that office??


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: fran on August 05, 2007, 09:56:35 PM
Ramm - is there any possibility that the Netherlands could put pressure on the DA to bring it to trial? 

no, the DA is independent precisely to avoid politicians pressuring them for politically based prosecutions.
Darn - thanks Ramm

OK, I don't get it. Didn't Aruba ask for the Dutch help? Wouldn't they need to go by their findings, or just ignore them? Aren't they all under the same laws, rules?

Would they keep the Dutch results secret?

Are we back to square one?  :sad:

fran


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: IndyDan on August 05, 2007, 10:02:52 PM
Would this apply for Natalee's case also?  Why are they investigating the case if they have no say in the case.

because they were asked to do so by the Aruban Ministry of Justice. However, the DA of Aruba is still the one who is in charge of the investigation.
So if one were to assume a corrupt legal system, particularly a good ole boy network with motive to coverup a crime against a young American girl -- who is the ultimate SUPERVISOR to call this out?  Is there anyone in the chain of command that has the real muscle to step in?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: SuzieQ on August 05, 2007, 10:03:02 PM
Ramm - is there any possibility that the Netherlands could put pressure on the DA to bring it to trial? 










 

no, the DA is independent precisely to avoid politicians pressuring them for politically based prosecutions.
Darn - thanks Ramm

OK, I don't get it. Didn't Aruba ask for the Dutch help? Wouldn't they need to go by their findings, or just ignore them? Aren't they all under the same laws, rules?

Would they keep the Dutch results secret?

Are we back to square one?  :sad:

fran

Finally caught up. Good stuff tonight. Welcome Ramm. I don't think we are at square one, I think it is a circle and we have been chaseing our tail all the time. It justs keeps going round and round. 
By the way good evening monkeys.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Rammstein on August 05, 2007, 10:05:43 PM
Ramm

Let's say, for whatever reason (sleeping with a suspect; bribed...), the DA is crooked.  What recourse does the country have??  Where is the "checks and balances" on that office??

for that there is the "Rijksrecherche". This is a special police force dedicated to investigating all public officials who are suspected of unlawful and/or unethical behavior and also who are guilty of dereliction of duty. Where as the DA is the boss of the regular police, the heads of the DA departments (the procureurs generaals) are in charge of the "Rijksrecherche".

There is internal control of quality, also there is the legal process who judges a DA on his functioning and the High council of the Netherlands (if need be). There are internal and external processes in place to be on the lookout for corruption/improper acts.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Buckeye on August 05, 2007, 10:07:57 PM
Ramm

Let's say, for whatever reason (sleeping with a suspect; bribed...), the DA is crooked.  What recourse does the country have??  Where is the "checks and balances" on that office??

for that there is the "Rijksrecherche". This is a special police force dedicated to investigating all public officials who are suspected of unlawful and/or unethical behavior and also who are guilty of dereliction of duty. Where as the DA is the boss of the regular police, the heads of the DA departments (the procureurs generaals) are in charge of the "Rijksrecherche".

There is internal control of quality, also there is the legal process who judges a DA on his functioning and the High council of the Netherlands (if need be). There are internal and external processes in place to be on the lookout for corruption/improper acts.

Would it be evident if this group was called in??  Or, would it be secret??


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 05, 2007, 10:09:03 PM
Hi SuzieQ!



Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: Buckeye on August 05, 2007, 10:12:16 PM
This is just a thought apart from what we've been discussing.

Let's say you want to go to the beach.  There are lots of roads leading to the beach.  Why would you want to be dropped off north of a hotel and not by the beach ??

Freddy asks if they stopped for food, etc.  Anybody else thinking that maybe everybody was trying to figure out an area that had no surveillance cameras etc??

hmmmmm


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: SuzieQ on August 05, 2007, 10:12:41 PM
Hi SuzieQ!



Hi mrs. red

Ramm we have something like that here also. It's called Internal Affairs, and it doesn's always work like it is suppose to.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/4/2007
Post by: Rammstein on August 05, 2007, 10:13:18 PM
Ramm

Let's say, for whatever reason (sleeping with a suspect; bribed...), the DA is crooked.  What recourse does the country have??  Where is the "checks and balances" on that office??

for that there is the "Rijksrecherche". This is a special police force dedicated to investigating all public officials who are suspected of unlawful and/or unethical behavior and also who are guilty of dereliction of duty. Where as the DA is the boss of the regular police, the heads of the DA departments (the procureurs generaals) are in charge of the "Rijksrecherche".

There is internal control of quality, also there is the legal process who judges a DA on his functioning and the High council of the Netherlands (if need be). There are internal and external processes in place to be on the lookout for corruption/improper acts.

Would it be evident if this group was called in??  Or, would it be secret??

depends on the case at hand. If an officer is being investigated for a shooting incident or a deadly accident then this would be known to the officer. But when it is about corruption then the Rijksrecherce probably will keep it quiet as long as possible in order to obtain as much evidence as possible.

Aruba almost certainly has the same kind of department for investigating corruption and other crimes of public officials.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on August 05, 2007, 10:14:15 PM
Good evening monkeys.  Hi SusieQ and Ramm!  Glad to see you

Ramm, thanks so much for sharing this info.  Very informative!

Hi Mrs. Red!


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: San on August 05, 2007, 10:14:20 PM
This is just a thought apart from what we've been discussing.

Let's say you want to go to the beach.  There are lots of roads leading to the beach.  Why would you want to be dropped off north of a hotel and not by the beach ??

Freddy asks if they stopped for food, etc.  Anybody else thinking that maybe everybody was trying to figure out an area that had no surveillance cameras etc??

hmmmmm

Yes they were Buckeye.  They got caught the first time. 


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: San on August 05, 2007, 10:15:55 PM
Good evening monkeys.  Hi SusieQ and Ramm!  Glad to see you

Ramm, thanks so much for sharing this info.  Very informative!

Hi Mrs. Red!

Hi Dihannah.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: SuzieQ on August 05, 2007, 10:17:26 PM
Good evening monkeys.  Hi SusieQ and Ramm!  Glad to see you

Ramm, thanks so much for sharing this info.  Very informative!

Hi Mrs. Red!

Hi Dihannah


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 05, 2007, 10:18:08 PM
Hey DiHannah...

Monkeys...great discussions today... lots to think about.

I need to get ready for Monday morning.. ugh.

keep the faith!

Nite...


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: Buckeye on August 05, 2007, 10:18:43 PM
Storms here.  Been knocked off twice.  Thanks to Ramm.  Glad you joined SM.  Sorry for all the questions.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: SuzieQ on August 05, 2007, 10:19:56 PM
Wow, had a really long hanging white page that time.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: SuzieQ on August 05, 2007, 10:30:19 PM
Great front page post on Tim Miller, in case someone has not seen it .
Goodnight to anyone still here, hopefully will see you tomorrow.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: San on August 05, 2007, 10:31:32 PM
Great front page post on Tim Miller, in case someone has not seen it .
Goodnight to anyone still here, hopefully will see you tomorrow.

Goodnight SuzieQ.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: sb on August 05, 2007, 10:46:58 PM
I don't know about y'all, but I don't think of monkeys, primates, etc. as being very prevalent on Aruba. :wink: Seriously, I  have not seen any discussion at all about the probability that a primate forearm would wash ashore in that area under normal circumstances.

I know that there are donkeys and domesticated animals, but neither Aruba nor the adjacent coast of Venezuela appear to have the type of geography and vegetation that I associate with animals like primates. I think of primates as a rain forest/jungle creature, not a dweller in open arid desert-like conditions.

I also know for certain (as we all do) that humans live in that place, and that they disappear periodically. I suspect the probabilities are more in favor of that being a HUMAN forearm. 


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: IBE on August 05, 2007, 10:50:28 PM
Klaas, I just got off the phone with Tim Miller of TES and asked him if I can post what he told me the reasons LE don't wish TES to come,

I know this is O/T May I post it here for IMO it's time for Monkey activation and a clarification about the site where she was last heard from


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: Destiny on August 05, 2007, 10:51:41 PM
Great front page post on Tim Miller, in case someone has not seen it .
Goodnight to anyone still here, hopefully will see you tomorrow.

Goodnight SuzieQ.

Just got back to computer...nite all you sleepy Monkeys going to bed...I'm still up for some time...am I here all alone...sniff...snifff..boo hoo..

Destiny


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: Destiny on August 05, 2007, 10:54:33 PM
Klaas, I just got off the phone with Tim Miller of TES and asked him if I can post what he told me the reasons LE don't wish TES to come,

I know this is O/T May I post it here for IMO it's time for Monkey activation and a clarification about the site where she was last heard from

ALRIIIGHT!!!

Hope she says yes.....

Destiny


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: IBE on August 05, 2007, 10:55:53 PM
Hello??? :lol: :lol:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on August 05, 2007, 10:57:50 PM
Klaas, I just got off the phone with Tim Miller of TES and asked him if I can post what he told me the reasons LE don't wish TES to come,

I know this is O/T May I post it here for IMO it's time for Monkey activation and a clarification about the site where she was last heard from

ALRIIIGHT!!!

Hope she says yes.....

Destiny

Me too Dest!  Between your calls, Ramms Dutch knowledge, then this info., If allowed to come out, then it's been a REALLY informative night.

Dest, I just read back and saw what you found out.  Thanks for having the guts and following up!


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 05, 2007, 10:58:02 PM
Klaas, I just got off the phone with Tim Miller of TES and asked him if I can post what he told me the reasons LE don't wish TES to come,

I know this is O/T May I post it here for IMO it's time for Monkey activation and a clarification about the site where she was last heard from

IBE - Sure, post it here AND in the MP thread.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: Destiny on August 05, 2007, 10:58:19 PM
Hello??? :lol: :lol:

Is it just here in the twilight zone???

Destiny


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: IBE on August 05, 2007, 10:58:28 PM
He wants me to call him back in 45 min. Anyone out there or am I too late?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: San on August 05, 2007, 10:58:29 PM
Klaas, I just got off the phone with Tim Miller of TES and asked him if I can post what he told me the reasons LE don't wish TES to come,

I know this is O/T May I post it here for IMO it's time for Monkey activation and a clarification about the site where she was last heard from

Go ahead and make your post IBE.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 05, 2007, 11:00:45 PM
He wants me to call him back in 45 min. Anyone out there or am I too late?

Please post it whenever you can IBE.  I'm interrested to hear the real story.  THANKS!


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: Destiny on August 05, 2007, 11:01:39 PM
He wants me to call him back in 45 min. Anyone out there or am I too late?

I'm in for the long haul....post away My Dear ;-)

Dest


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: sleddogs on August 05, 2007, 11:03:04 PM
#@%*%*%^@!!!!!

And I was just ready for bed. Oh well, whats another 45 minutes!!!   :lol:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: Destiny on August 05, 2007, 11:04:52 PM
He wants me to call him back in 45 min. Anyone out there or am I too late?

IBE,

I think it is just awesome that you have the trust and friendship of Tim/TES....Thank You!!!

Dest


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on August 05, 2007, 11:05:31 PM
IBE gave up waiting for us to respond, or it's a REALLY long post! :P


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 05, 2007, 11:06:56 PM
While we are waiting on IBE - here's a WTF story from Florida:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,292196,00.html

Drunk Woman Runs Over Instructor During Driving Lesson in Florida


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on August 05, 2007, 11:08:50 PM
While we are waiting on IBE - here's a WTF story from Florida:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,292196,00.html

Drunk Woman Runs Over Instructor During Driving Lesson in Florida

 :shock:  Wow, instructor didn't smell the alcohol on her?  Nothing ceases to amaze me anymore!


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 05, 2007, 11:10:11 PM
IBE posted this in the MP thread about 1/2 hour ago:

"We had received "bad news to us" Friday that the police said "absolutely no" to allowing Texas Equu Search at the moment" from the post Dana made from Michelle, whom I am taking for granted is the mother.

There is becoming a big confusion the media is doing and I think this also goes back to the family..... from my understanding the father lives in Houston and ask TES.

The LAPD has said absolutely no. I think, she went missing in West LA just over the Culver City boarder. This would be LAPD jurisdiction as far as where the supposed suspect lives.

Orange County is where the mom and the daughter lives. IMO LAPD is putting pressure on Orange County to also say no... OC could say no, if they think she didn't go missing there.

I want to know where the last message from her cell phone came. If it came from Orange County, then the search would be there.

IMO the last place was West LA. IMO

Funny thing, if they think she is along the RR tracks... that property is owned by CALTRANS :-x






Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: Destiny on August 05, 2007, 11:10:34 PM
While we are waiting on IBE - here's a WTF story from Florida:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,292196,00.html

Drunk Woman Runs Over Instructor During Driving Lesson in Florida

That was Funny ;-)

Thanks for the filler Klaas!...got some more?

Dest


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on August 05, 2007, 11:13:34 PM
Thanks Klaas!  We woulda been up waiting along time, if you hadn't found it!  :wink:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 05, 2007, 11:13:48 PM
OK - here's another with a happy ending:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,292180,00.html

Israeli Boy Rescued From Dead Sea After Family Leaves Him


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 05, 2007, 11:14:20 PM
Thanks Klaas!  We woulda been up waiting along time, if you hadn't found it!  :wink:
I think IBE may have more than that although I could be wrong.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: robots on August 05, 2007, 11:16:26 PM
the DUTCH will get them all  :cool:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: sb on August 05, 2007, 11:17:13 PM
According to the news down in Florida, the guy wasn't a driving instructor, he was her STEPFATHER. LOL!


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 05, 2007, 11:17:43 PM
Technology news:

http://apnews.excite.com/article/20070804/D8QPUPS80.html

Hackers: Social Networking Sites Flawed


 LAS VEGAS (AP) - Social networking Web sites such as MySpace.com are increasingly juicy targets for computer hackers, who are demonstrating a pair of vulnerabilities they claim expose sensitive personal information and could be exploited by online criminals.

The flaws are being demonstrated this week at the Black Hat and Defcon hacker conferences, which draw thousands of people to Las Vegas each year for five days of training and demonstrations of the latest exploits.
 (snipped)


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: Destiny on August 05, 2007, 11:19:23 PM
IBE posted this in the MP thread about 1/2 hour ago:

"We had received "bad news to us" Friday that the police said "absolutely no" to allowing Texas Equu Search at the moment" from the post Dana made from Michelle, whom I am taking for granted is the mother.

There is becoming a big confusion the media is doing and I think this also goes back to the family..... from my understanding the father lives in Houston and ask TES.

The LAPD has said absolutely no. I think, she went missing in West LA just over the Culver City boarder. This would be LAPD jurisdiction as far as where the supposed suspect lives.

Orange County is where the mom and the daughter lives. IMO LAPD is putting pressure on Orange County to also say no... OC could say no, if they think she didn't go missing there.

I want to know where the last message from her cell phone came. If it came from Orange County, then the search would be there.

IMO the last place was West LA. IMO

Funny thing, if they think she is along the RR tracks... that property is owned by CALTRANS :-x





What I don't understand is why won't LE take the free help offered by a very respected group such as TES...it's just plain old EGO bullsh*t.

That's why half the cold crimes don't get solved..it's like little kids on the playground...little stinkin' *turf wars*.  It makes me sick, and it just hurts the Families of the victims.

Dest...AAAAAARRRRRRRGGGGGHHHHHH!!!


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on August 05, 2007, 11:22:28 PM
the DUTCH will get them all  :cool:

My feelings lately?  Will believe it, when I see it!  :-x

But thanks Robots!  :2waver:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: sb on August 05, 2007, 11:23:58 PM
I suspect it's more than a turf war involved here, though.  I am anxious to hear what new flights of brilliance the LAPD has risen to on this one. We are, after all talking about California...

(KLAAS close your eyes for a minute LOL)

... The Granola-Bar State, you know, nuts and flakes and the like...

(OK KLAAS, you can open them now) :lol:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: IBE on August 05, 2007, 11:24:38 PM
Got thrown off the board.. had to re-log in (is re-log a word?)

OK I talked twice to Tim Miller Friday night. IMO it was hoped that it would come out in Geraldo's interview with Mr. Jou, Donna Jou's father who lives in Houston that he had asked TES to come in and search for his daughter and there were denied by Law Enforcement... both LAPD and Orange County.

Just got off the phone with Tim and he said it was OK for me to post the reasons given.

LE (and here I am taking for granted it's LAPD, for that where she was last heard from... West LA) It is felt that if the supposed suspect in FLA doesn't talk and tell where her body is, we will never know.

That LAPD is, perhaps, using Orange County as their mouthpiece

LE says they have 10,000 Search and Rescue around (??? I am not sure if they mean all of CA or what..via IBE) so they don't need TES

"You are not coming"

When TES offered to come in without tshirts and media they said "don't show up"

It is thought by Tim that she is 0-5 to 7 miles from the supposedly suspect's house but more likely extremely close (I am paraphrasing here)

It is his hope that LE doesn't screw up for the longer time she is missing the more decomposing of the body and the lack of evidence.

And he said something about egos.

I asked him tonight about WHERE the last message came from her for in the media it is confusing between Orange County location and LA.

The last message is according to what a Monkey posted in the Donna Jou thread.. where she was in his bathroom and called a friend to say he was acting weird.

Tim Miller told me Friday that there are two really bad things,,,

1) That a child is murdered
and 2) not knowing where she is and no one giving a shit. (I think he said shit for I have that in my notes) Sorry Tim if I put in my own word there.

I asked him who Michelle was who sent the email to Dana and he said that was an Aunt.

Tim said he told LE that it wouldn't cost anyone a dime, no $1000, and he had the resources. The answer is still don't come, we don't need you.

Monkeys, I did tell Tim that I had talked to Jim Amormino, spokesman for Orange County Sheriffs on Friday also... from a "Path that crossed" 30 years ago.

(IMO I don't want to loose these "paths")

PS People mag. said this week, in their "People Heroes Among Us" feature that "Since starting TES in 2000 he has led 730 searches-often from atop of a bay horse named Trojan-involving 42,200 volunteers in 30 states. TES searchers have located 200 live people and 71 bodies."

-----
Friday I had called Jim and left a message and he called me back. He said he was on the way to talk to the Jou family... I guess it was the vigil for Donna Jou in Santa Ana Friday night (hdqt for Orange County Sheriff's) and the spokesman, Jim Amormino was on and said they are looking into the computer and truck of the man... (I was excited here... so I think I got the rest right.. that hopefully this would lead to leads)

---- Tim Miller was on a motorcycle when I called and he asked me to call back in about 45 min. I am going to ask how we can help... ie: Scared Monkeys.

He also told me Friday that he had a nice lunch with Red last week :lol:



Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: Destiny on August 05, 2007, 11:24:45 PM
OK - here's another with a happy ending:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,292180,00.html

Israeli Boy Rescued From Dead Sea After Family Leaves Him

So Great they found him and he was ok...bet the poor little feller was scared...and wrinkled like a raisen....I know...I'm very baaaad.

Dest


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on August 05, 2007, 11:25:10 PM
BTW,  I emailed Carol Moyers last week from TES, about the searches in Columbus, OH coming up, but her response came back to me, with NO text.  :silent: I responded, with nothing yet.  But I just sent another email to the Volunteer email addy and copied Tim.

So hoping to hear about the searches (2 of them at same time) here and Marlee and I still hoping to help out!


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: robots on August 05, 2007, 11:26:44 PM
the DUTCH will get them all  :cool:

My feelings lately?  Will believe it, when I see it!  :-x

But thanks Robots!  :2waver:

when im smoking a cigar and drinking a glass of wine.. i will still invite you over :lol: :cool:



Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on August 05, 2007, 11:28:53 PM
Thanks IBE!  Your right, never lose your contacts or burn your bridges.

I AM so glad People mag. put him in there magazine as the true hero, that he is!  That is a wide spread/popular magazine and much deserved, publicity article for TES!



Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: robots on August 05, 2007, 11:31:09 PM
Thanks IBE!  Your right, never lose your contacts or burn your bridges.

I AM so glad People mag. put him in there magazine as the true hero, that he is!  That is a wide spread/popular magazine and much deserved, publicity article for TES!



i usually burn my bridges...... burn em up

cant ever go back,  course im talking business, not socially   :cool:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on August 05, 2007, 11:31:09 PM
the DUTCH will get them all  :cool:

My feelings lately?  Will believe it, when I see it!  :-x

But thanks Robots!  :2waver:

when im smoking a cigar and drinking a glass of wine.. i will still invite you over :lol: :cool:



Trust me!  I WILL BE there!  I will will pitch in for all too!

I just wish you had something more than a gut hunch to go on..    :sad:    :smt100


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: robots on August 05, 2007, 11:31:55 PM
the DUTCH will get them all  :cool:

My feelings lately?  Will believe it, when I see it!  :-x

But thanks Robots!  :2waver:

when im smoking a cigar and drinking a glass of wine.. i will still invite you over :lol: :cool:



Trust me!  I WILL BE there!  I will will pitch in for all too!

I just wish you had something more than a gut hunch to go on..    :sad:    :smt100

my insticnts are honed

like a razor  :cool:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: IBE on August 05, 2007, 11:33:18 PM
I also told Tim that the RR tracks area... where the media said they found the man's tool box with his truck license and motorcycle helmet in it is owned by CALTRANS and it runs in WLA and then in Culver City, then into LA again. It is private property so to speak.

In regards to the supposed suspect's tool box.. I have heard two locations: off the freeway near 1 10 and 1 405 (San Diego Fwy) and in a park near the freeway.

Klaas, if it's OK with Fran, will you please give her my email address? TIA

PS There's a petition site listed here under the Donna Jou site to get the man back to CA.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: robots on August 05, 2007, 11:33:55 PM
you know sometimes its good to have a person in the enemy camp






let me state this again...


IT IS GOOD TO HAVE A PERSON in the enemy camp

in regular terms, we call it a spy  :cool:

or a double agent,

they can be good

 :cool:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 05, 2007, 11:34:17 PM
Got thrown off the board.. had to re-log in (is re-log a word?)

OK I talked twice to Tim Miller Friday night. IMO it was hoped that it would come out in Geraldo's interview with Mr. Jou, Donna Jou's father who lives in Houston that he had asked TES to come in and search for his daughter and there were denied by Law Enforcement... both LAPD and Orange County.

Just got off the phone with Tim and he said it was OK for me to post the reasons given.

LE (and here I am taking for granted it's LAPD, for that where she was last heard from... West LA) It is felt that if the supposed suspect in FLA doesn't talk and tell where her body is, we will never know.

That LAPD is, perhaps, using Orange County as their mouthpiece

LE says they have 10,000 Search and Rescue around (??? I am not sure if they mean all of CA or what..via IBE) so they don't need TES

"You are not coming"

When TES offered to come in without tshirts and media they said "don't show up"

It is thought by Tim that she is 0-5 to 7 miles from the supposedly suspect's house but more likely extremely close (I am paraphrasing here)

It is his hope that LE doesn't screw up for the longer time she is missing the more decomposing of the body and the lack of evidence.

And he said something about egos.

I asked him tonight about WHERE the last message came from her for in the media it is confusing between Orange County location and LA.

The last message is according to what a Monkey posted in the Donna Jou thread.. where she was in his bathroom and called a friend to say he was acting weird.

Tim Miller told me Friday that there are two really bad things,,,

1) That a child is murdered
and 2) not knowing where she is and no one giving a shit. (I think he said shit for I have that in my notes) Sorry Tim if I put in my own word there.

I asked him who Michelle was who sent the email to Dana and he said that was an Aunt.

Tim said he told LE that it wouldn't cost anyone a dime, no $1000, and he had the resources. The answer is still don't come, we don't need you.

Monkeys, I did tell Tim that I had talked to Jim Amormino, spokesman for Orange County Sheriffs on Friday also... from a "Path that crossed" 30 years ago.

(IMO I don't want to loose these "paths")

PS People mag. said this week, in their "People Heroes Among Us" feature that "Since starting TES in 2000 he has led 730 searches-often from atop of a bay horse named Trojan-involving 42,200 volunteers in 30 states. TES searchers have located 200 live people and 71 bodies."

-----
Friday I had called Jim and left a message and he called me back. He said he was on the way to talk to the Jou family... I guess it was the vigil for Donna Jou in Santa Ana Friday night (hdqt for Orange County Sheriff's) and the spokesman, Jim Amormino was on and said they are looking into the computer and truck of the man... (I was excited here... so I think I got the rest right.. that hopefully this would lead to leads)

---- Tim Miller was on a motorcycle when I called and he asked me to call back in about 45 min. I am going to ask how we can help... ie: Scared Monkeys.

He also told me Friday that he had a nice lunch with Red last week :lol:



I hope they find something from the computer as well.  I agree with Tim.  If she was murdered, her body is near his home in LA.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 05, 2007, 11:35:29 PM
I also told Tim that the RR tracks area... where the media said they found the man's tool box with his truck license and motorcycle helmet in it is owned by CALTRANS and it runs in WLA and then in Culver City, then into LA again. It is private property so to speak.

In regards to the supposed suspect's tool box.. I have heard two locations: off the freeway near 1 10 and 1 405 (San Diego Fwy) and in a park near the freeway.

Klaas, if it's OK with Fran, will you please give her my email address? TIA

PS There's a petition site listed here under the Donna Jou site to get the man back to CA.

IBE - sure I'll send Fran your email addy


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: Destiny on August 05, 2007, 11:35:32 PM
Got thrown off the board.. had to re-log in (is re-log a word?)

OK I talked twice to Tim Miller Friday night. IMO it was hoped that it would come out in Geraldo's interview with Mr. Jou, Donna Jou's father who lives in Houston that he had asked TES to come in and search for his daughter and there were denied by Law Enforcement... both LAPD and Orange County.

Just got off the phone with Tim and he said it was OK for me to post the reasons given.

LE (and here I am taking for granted it's LAPD, for that where she was last heard from... West LA) It is felt that if the supposed suspect in FLA doesn't talk and tell where her body is, we will never know.

That LAPD is, perhaps, using Orange County as their mouthpiece

LE says they have 10,000 Search and Rescue around (??? I am not sure if they mean all of CA or what..via IBE) so they don't need TES

"You are not coming"

When TES offered to come in without tshirts and media they said "don't show up"

It is thought by Tim that she is 0-5 to 7 miles from the supposedly suspect's house but more likely extremely close (I am paraphrasing here)

It is his hope that LE doesn't screw up for the longer time she is missing the more decomposing of the body and the lack of evidence.

And he said something about egos.

I asked him tonight about WHERE the last message came from her for in the media it is confusing between Orange County location and LA.

The last message is according to what a Monkey posted in the Donna Jou thread.. where she was in his bathroom and called a friend to say he was acting weird.

Tim Miller told me Friday that there are two really bad things,,,

1) That a child is murdered
and 2) not knowing where she is and no one giving a shit. (I think he said shit for I have that in my notes) Sorry Tim if I put in my own word there.

I asked him who Michelle was who sent the email to Dana and he said that was an Aunt.

Tim said he told LE that it wouldn't cost anyone a dime, no $1000, and he had the resources. The answer is still don't come, we don't need you.

Monkeys, I did tell Tim that I had talked to Jim Amormino, spokesman for Orange County Sheriffs on Friday also... from a "Path that crossed" 30 years ago.

(IMO I don't want to loose these "paths")

PS People mag. said this week, in their "People Heroes Among Us" feature that "Since starting TES in 2000 he has led 730 searches-often from atop of a bay horse named Trojan-involving 42,200 volunteers in 30 states. TES searchers have located 200 live people and 71 bodies."

-----
Friday I had called Jim and left a message and he called me back. He said he was on the way to talk to the Jou family... I guess it was the vigil for Donna Jou in Santa Ana Friday night (hdqt for Orange County Sheriff's) and the spokesman, Jim Amormino was on and said they are looking into the computer and truck of the man... (I was excited here... so I think I got the rest right.. that hopefully this would lead to leads)

---- Tim Miller was on a motorcycle when I called and he asked me to call back in about 45 min. I am going to ask how we can help... ie: Scared Monkeys.

He also told me Friday that he had a nice lunch with Red last week :lol:



GREAT WORK IBE!!!!!!

Thank You for the *inside* scoop...You Rock!!!

Dest


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: IBE on August 05, 2007, 11:36:05 PM
the DUTCH will get them all  :cool:

My feelings lately?  Will believe it, when I see it!  :-x

But thanks Robots!  :2waver:

when im smoking a cigar and drinking a glass of wine.. i will still invite you over :lol: :cool:



TBA... party at ROBOTS


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: San on August 05, 2007, 11:39:59 PM
Thank you IBE for the info.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on August 05, 2007, 11:40:24 PM
you know sometimes its good to have a person in the enemy camp






let me state this again...


IT IS GOOD TO HAVE A PERSON in the enemy camp

in regular terms, we call it a spy  :cool:

or a double agent,

they can be good

 :cool:


hhhmmmm,  not sure how to take that!  But hoping/praying YOU are the spy?  :lol:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: IBE on August 05, 2007, 11:42:48 PM
Thank you... but I just want her and other missing persons found. I feel like a yenta (matchmaker) at times in my life and this is one of them.

IMO I do see LE reasons... ie: logistics perhaps ??? for a search. This areas is very dense in people and buildings. Too bad it didn't happen about 2 1/2 blocks south where there is a smaller city to deal with and a more "mid-western" frame of thought.

Remember... we are dealing with LA here.. I lived there for 34 yrs. People go missing and get murdered everyday. Some aren't even reported as far as missing for they are maybe illegals or maybe just don't trust the police because of their culture.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: San on August 05, 2007, 11:43:41 PM
(http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d118/Sanddrops/Scared%20Monkeys/threadlock.jpg)


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 05, 2007, 11:46:08 PM
(http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d118/Sanddrops/Scared%20Monkeys/threadlock.jpg)

 :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/threadlock.jpg)


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: Rooscrew on August 05, 2007, 11:46:41 PM
Good Evening monkeys! :)

IBE & Destiny~
You both deserve great big kuddos & hugs for what you've accomplished today. You both ROCK!!  GREAT JOB!!

Welcome to the new monkeys in the cage Fran, Ramm, and all the new monkeys. Great to see Carnut, Magnolia, and a bunch of others back posting again.

Roos~


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: IBE on August 05, 2007, 11:46:52 PM
Oh shot... again I hit post and I wanted to hit preview.

Also remember, around here if they only watch the local channels for news TES is not as well known unless you watch say, Nancy Grace, BOR, Geraldo, CNN or Greta.

IMO the People's article came out at the right time.. it did mentioned that TES comes in the help understaffed LE.. gee aren't they all understaffed and underpaid :lol: I hope this works out in time.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: IBE on August 05, 2007, 11:49:53 PM
Maybe Red will do a FP article oh why and why not in the search.

Didn't someone say Mr. Jou will be on Nancy Grace??? I hope he isn't cut off like with Geraldo!


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 05, 2007, 11:51:21 PM
Maybe Red will do a FP article oh why and why not in the search.

Didn't someone say Mr. Jou will be on Nancy Grace??? I hope he isn't cut off like with Geraldo!

They did but I don't know when he will be on Nancy Grace.  To be honest, I never watch her and don't know what time she comes on, do you?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 05, 2007, 11:52:35 PM
IBE - be sure to email the information you posted to Red or Mrs. Red so they are sure to see it, OK?  Just copy and paste your post into an email.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: GrannyToad on August 05, 2007, 11:58:06 PM
I don't know about y'all, but I don't think of monkeys, primates, etc. as being very prevalent on Aruba. :wink: Seriously, I  have not seen any discussion at all about the probability that a primate forearm would wash ashore in that area under normal circumstances.

I know that there are donkeys and domesticated animals, but neither Aruba nor the adjacent coast of Venezuela appear to have the type of geography and vegetation that I associate with animals like primates. I think of primates as a rain forest/jungle creature, not a dweller in open arid desert-like conditions.

I also know for certain (as we all do) that humans live in that place, and that they disappear periodically. I suspect the probabilities are more in favor of that being a HUMAN forearm. 

It was found on some Venezuelan shoreline. From what I can tell the structures do suggest monkey not human. If you look at the pics given of each bones set, human and monkey, then compare each to the "forearm & hand" pic on the sheet of newspaper, I can discriminate differences, but then I've done a lot of that in the lab from the faunal materials from archaeological sites - meaning that my brain knows how to look for differences and similarities of even broken bits & parts.  Mundane, ain't it. BoRR-RRing


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: IBE on August 05, 2007, 11:58:20 PM
I have Direct TV and it says the Headline News Channel, 5,7 and 10 pm. I don't know what time "in real life" I do know I have to switch back and forth between her and Greta at times.

She might be on Court TV too. I only watch the Food, DIYnetwork, HGTV, Fox, CNN, HLn and MSNBC. Am sheltered!

That's why I miss Carnut here. He used to tell us where there were musicals and good feeling movies on TV.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 05, 2007, 11:59:46 PM
I have Direct TV and it says the Headline News Channel, 5,7 and 10 pm. I don't know what time "in real life" I do know I have to switch back and forth between her and Greta at times.

She might be on Court TV too. I only watch the Food, DIYnetwork, HGTV, Fox, CNN, HLn and MSNBC. Am sheltered!

That's why I miss Carnut here. He used to tell us where there were musicals and good feeling movies on TV.
I think Carnut is in the chat room right now, LOL


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: Destiny on August 06, 2007, 12:00:19 AM
the DUTCH will get them all  :cool:

My feelings lately?  Will believe it, when I see it!  :-x

But thanks Robots!  :2waver:

when im smoking a cigar and drinking a glass of wine.. i will still invite you over :lol: :cool:



TBA... party at ROBOTS

Hi Robots...not to be a snob, but, I'll bring my own humidor...I like to share ;-)

Dest


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on August 06, 2007, 12:00:57 AM
 :D I was just going to tell IBE that Carnut was back in here...


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: Destiny on August 06, 2007, 12:02:45 AM
I don't know about y'all, but I don't think of monkeys, primates, etc. as being very prevalent on Aruba. :wink: Seriously, I  have not seen any discussion at all about the probability that a primate forearm would wash ashore in that area under normal circumstances.

I know that there are donkeys and domesticated animals, but neither Aruba nor the adjacent coast of Venezuela appear to have the type of geography and vegetation that I associate with animals like primates. I think of primates as a rain forest/jungle creature, not a dweller in open arid desert-like conditions.

I also know for certain (as we all do) that humans live in that place, and that they disappear periodically. I suspect the probabilities are more in favor of that being a HUMAN forearm. 

It was found on some Venezuelan shoreline. From what I can tell the structures do suggest monkey not human. If you look at the pics given of each bones set, human and monkey, then compare each to the "forearm & hand" pic on the sheet of newspaper, I can discriminate differences, but then I've done a lot of that in the lab from the faunal materials from archaeological sites - meaning that my brain knows how to look for differences and similarities of even broken bits & parts.  Mundane, ain't it. BoRR-RRing

GT,

You've got my vote!

Dest ;-)


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on August 06, 2007, 12:04:43 AM
I was in chat and let Carnut know he is wanted! 


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: Carnut on August 06, 2007, 12:06:52 AM
I have Direct TV and it says the Headline News Channel, 5,7 and 10 pm. I don't know what time "in real life" I do know I have to switch back and forth between her and Greta at times.

She might be on Court TV too. I only watch the Food, DIYnetwork, HGTV, Fox, CNN, HLn and MSNBC. Am sheltered!

That's why I miss Carnut here. He used to tell us where there were musicals and good feeling movies on TV.

I'm on TCM all night Jimmy Stewart movies.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: Destiny on August 06, 2007, 12:07:04 AM
I don't know about y'all, but I don't think of monkeys, primates, etc. as being very prevalent on Aruba. :wink: Seriously, I  have not seen any discussion at all about the probability that a primate forearm would wash ashore in that area under normal circumstances.

I know that there are donkeys and domesticated animals, but neither Aruba nor the adjacent coast of Venezuela appear to have the type of geography and vegetation that I associate with animals like primates. I think of primates as a rain forest/jungle creature, not a dweller in open arid desert-like conditions.

I also know for certain (as we all do) that humans live in that place, and that they disappear periodically. I suspect the probabilities are more in favor of that being a HUMAN forearm. 

It was found on some Venezuelan shoreline. From what I can tell the structures do suggest monkey not human. If you look at the pics given of each bones set, human and monkey, then compare each to the "forearm & hand" pic on the sheet of newspaper, I can discriminate differences, but then I've done a lot of that in the lab from the faunal materials from archaeological sites - meaning that my brain knows how to look for differences and similarities of even broken bits & parts.  Mundane, ain't it. BoRR-RRing

GT,

You've got my vote!

Dest ;-)

Oh No...I didn't mean the booooring mundane part of your post...oh chit...I meant the credentials part...how exciting that is...

Dest


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: Dugga on August 06, 2007, 12:07:51 AM
IBE just gave us some really important information. I would hate for it to get buried in the hundreds of LCD threads in the archives. Shouldn't we consider either splitting those facts and placing them in the relevant Missing Persons thread, or at the very least cross-posting them there? It would seem like that's some really solid details on an as of yet unsolved case and I would hate to see overlooked because of the high traffic in LCD.

Anyone have any thoughts on that?



Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: Carnut on August 06, 2007, 12:08:27 AM
I'll also reinterate that I am GrannyToads biggest fan.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on August 06, 2007, 12:09:26 AM
I'm glad to see Grannytoad too!  and glad to see Ramm joined as well!

I'm heading off to bed now!


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on August 06, 2007, 12:11:05 AM
Good night and sweet dreams monkeys!   Until tommorow! :sunny:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: Destiny on August 06, 2007, 12:13:44 AM
Good night and sweet dreams monkeys!   Until tommorow! :sunny:

Nite Di ;-)


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on August 06, 2007, 12:17:45 AM
(http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d118/Sanddrops/Scared%20Monkeys/threadlock.jpg)

 :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/threadlock.jpg)

I just knew there was an echo in the new cages!

Hello Monkeys - have been logged in previously but got caught up in the chat room  :shock:

GrannyT I have always been interested in archaeological discoveries, especially of old civilisations


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 06, 2007, 12:18:24 AM
IBE just gave us some really important information. I would hate for it to get buried in the hundreds of LCD threads in the archives. Shouldn't we consider either splitting those facts and placing them in the relevant Missing Persons thread, or at the very least cross-posting them there? It would seem like that's some really solid details on an as of yet unsolved case and I would hate to see overlooked because of the high traffic in LCD.

Anyone have any thoughts on that?



Dugga - I just copied it over to the Donna Jou thread in the MP forum.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on August 06, 2007, 12:19:36 AM
 :smt006  Waving to hummingbird.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: San on August 06, 2007, 12:27:43 AM
:smt006  Waving to hummingbird.

 :smt039


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on August 06, 2007, 12:29:25 AM
Hi again San - quiet in here.



Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: San on August 06, 2007, 12:32:11 AM
Hi again San - quiet in here.



Yeah it got a little quiet.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on August 06, 2007, 12:36:16 AM
Now there is not much OT it is easier to catch up reading.  Takes me a quarter of the time now and I miss out on my second cup of coffee  :lol:

Does not look like you will get to 50 pages tonight so I can leave and do exciting things like ironing, cooking dinner etc.
Will check back tomorrow.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: sb on August 06, 2007, 12:36:42 AM
I am certainly no forensics expert so I will gladly defer to the venerable GrannyToad on the matter of the bone. :wink: It did seem a little incongruous to pass it over so quickly when it first came up because we were so starved and anxious to find the first shred of evidence of Natalee. We STILL are.

I am not of the opinion that any remains could be found in the water by now unless that fish trap was used to contain her body. THAT, I am sure that TES could find w/ the equipment they are taking down there.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: hummingbird7525 on August 06, 2007, 12:46:02 AM
:smt006  Waving to hummingbird.

Hi My Monkeys, Tib and San
I can't believe how many new family members I have, sorta like nobody told me mom and dad were expecting! :shock:  :shock:  :shock: Nice to have such a large Monkey family.  Welcome to all of you.  I seem to have a hard time catching up.  I read, then go do something, then read, daze out watching my own Hummers out the kitchen window, go help Mr Hummingbird in the garage, and read a little more.  At this rate I never get caught up.  But I still keep reading, you all are such a big part of my life, and always will be.  I've tried to post before, but couldn't get it to go through, so hope this one does.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: San on August 06, 2007, 12:49:19 AM
:smt006  Waving to hummingbird.

Hi My Monkeys, Tib and San
I can't believe how many new family members I have, sorta like nobody told me mom and dad were expecting! :shock:  :shock:  :shock: Nice to have such a large Monkey family.  Welcome to all of you.  I seem to have a hard time catching up.  I read, then go do something, then read, daze out watching my own Hummers out the kitchen window, go help Mr Hummingbird in the garage, and read a little more.  At this rate I never get caught up.  But I still keep reading, you all are such a big part of my life, and always will be.  I've tried to post before, but couldn't get it to go through, so hope this one does.

Hi Hummingbird, looks like you made it in the cage ok.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 06, 2007, 12:49:24 AM
Hummingbird - good to see you!


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: sb on August 06, 2007, 12:50:05 AM
Yes, it is quiet on the front tonight. I think I'll sign off and call it a day... see y'all tomorrow!


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on August 06, 2007, 12:50:20 AM
Yes that worked hummingbird.  Nice to see you again.  We certainly have a big increase in our monkey family.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 06, 2007, 12:52:39 AM
Nite SB


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: hummingbird7525 on August 06, 2007, 12:54:18 AM
Yes that worked hummingbird.  Nice to see you again.  We certainly have a big increase in our monkey family.

I know isn't it nice.  Oh dear Klaas, I noticed at the bottom right corner of my post I see a number that looks like IP, how do I get rid of it.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 06, 2007, 12:56:36 AM
Yes that worked hummingbird.  Nice to see you again.  We certainly have a big increase in our monkey family.

I know isn't it nice.  Oh dear Klaas, I noticed at the bottom right corner of my post I see a number that looks like IP, how do I get rid of it.

Only you and Admin can see the IP, nobody else can.   :wink:  Just like you can't see anyone elses.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: Destiny on August 06, 2007, 12:56:46 AM
It's getting close to sleepy time for me too...fed 4 cats 2 doggies....and got some great info from a post of Ramms'...now all I need to get from him are the phone #'s....I love calling people!

You Monkeys are a great group.

Dest


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 06, 2007, 12:57:20 AM
Nite Destiny - great work today!


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on August 06, 2007, 12:59:17 AM
Nite sb and Destiny.



Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on August 06, 2007, 01:00:07 AM
It's getting close to sleepy time for me too...fed 4 cats 2 doggies....and got some great info from a post of Ramms'...now all I need to get from him are the phone #'s....I love calling people!

You Monkeys are a great group.

Dest


You will be an asset for Dana's shows, too....phone calls, that is...some of us are not a good at it..

G'nite.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on August 06, 2007, 01:01:24 AM
Hey 2NJ - sorry you are having troubles getting into the chat room.
BTW have you flushed any trolls away yet?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: hummingbird7525 on August 06, 2007, 01:01:40 AM
Yes that worked hummingbird.  Nice to see you again.  We certainly have a big increase in our monkey family.

I know isn't it nice.  Oh dear Klaas, I noticed at the bottom right corner of my post I see a number that looks like IP, how do I get rid of it.

Only you and Admin can see the IP, nobody else can.   :wink:  Just like you can't see anyone elses.


Oh, OK hun, I've seen you say that a hundred times to others.  Now I know what they were talking about.  I'm gonna hit the bed also.  Now that I see I can post, I'll see you all tomorrow.  Go play some games Klaas, and then get some rest also.  Goodnight My Monkeys.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 06, 2007, 01:02:58 AM
 :lol: Nite Hummingbird


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on August 06, 2007, 01:05:31 AM
Hey 2NJ - sorry you are having troubles getting into the chat room.
BTW have you flushed any trolls away yet?

Hi, Tibro...yes, I will try to get screen shots for Dugga tomorrow...when I enter chat, I've only been able to post 2 msgs...the chat just goes haywire...and I do not know if I've flushed any trolls....unless the quiet when I post means something..... :lol: :lol:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on August 06, 2007, 01:08:57 AM
 :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: 2NJ

Night Night hummingbird.

I notice my washing has not ironed itself yet so really must go this time.

Be good monkeys


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: robots on August 06, 2007, 01:09:59 AM
you know sometimes its good to have a person in the enemy camp






let me state this again...


IT IS GOOD TO HAVE A PERSON in the enemy camp

in regular terms, we call it a spy  :cool:

or a double agent,

they can be good

 :cool:


hhhmmmm,  not sure how to take that!  But hoping/praying YOU are the spy?  :lol:

good robots are good spies


im a good robots  :cool:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: MuffyBee on August 06, 2007, 01:11:16 AM
Hey 2NJ - sorry you are having troubles getting into the chat room.
BTW have you flushed any trolls away yet?

Hi, Tibro...yes, I will try to get screen shots for Dugga tomorrow...when I enter chat, I've only been able to post 2 msgs...the chat just goes haywire...and I do not know if I've flushed any trolls....unless the quiet when I post means something..... :lol: :lol:

I saw you in chat tonight Mom, and thought things were okay-saw you post.  But then you were gone.  Hope this gets resolved soon, you are missed.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on August 06, 2007, 01:11:23 AM
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: 2NJ

Night Night hummingbird.

I notice my washing has not ironed itself yet so really must go this time.

Be good monkeys

Ah, ironing...another of my favorites...I have an alternate avatar for that, ya know?...see ya later....


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: IBE on August 06, 2007, 01:15:02 AM
Thanks Klaas and Dugga: for moving the post to the Donna Jou thread too. I am on information overload at the moment. Thanks again. Am turning on TV some a J. Stewart movie, thanks, Carnut. Welcome back!!!

Monkeys, Keep up the Good Works!


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on August 06, 2007, 01:16:42 AM
Hey 2NJ - sorry you are having troubles getting into the chat room.
BTW have you flushed any trolls away yet?

Hi, Tibro...yes, I will try to get screen shots for Dugga tomorrow...when I enter chat, I've only been able to post 2 msgs...the chat just goes haywire...and I do not know if I've flushed any trolls....unless the quiet when I post means something..... :lol: :lol:

I saw you in chat tonight Mom, and thought things were okay-saw you post.  But then you were gone.  Hope this gets resolved soon, you are missed.

MuffyBee, I said 'hi' to you yesterday and was able to type a full message to BT tonight which included info that I may not be able to hang in...well, of course the same thing happened...everything was frozen and I could no longer post so I was out of there....boxes pop up, etc.  It may be the operating system on this PC...Quite honestly, I do not know if I can keep up in the chat, but I was able to get in on the old one.  Time will tell....I'm always happy to see you are online, and back in the states....love your company...


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on August 06, 2007, 01:19:46 AM
Goodnight...see you on the end of this thread or the beginning of the next...time for zzzzzzzzzzzz


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 06, 2007, 01:30:43 AM
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: 2NJ

Night Night hummingbird.

I notice my washing has not ironed itself yet so really must go this time.

Be good monkeys

Ah, ironing...another of my favorites...I have an alternate avatar for that, ya know?...see ya later....

 :lol: :lol:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub2/MonkeyIroning.gif)


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: crazymom on August 06, 2007, 01:59:41 AM
Hey Klaas,

Any word on when the water search will begin?  TIA


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 06, 2007, 02:12:49 AM
Hey Klaas,

Any word on when the water search will begin?  TIA

Crazymom - someone reported at BFN that it won't be until October now.  Not sure of all the details.  I think Red will have more information some time this week.

GOODNIGHT ALL!


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: crazymom on August 06, 2007, 02:20:53 AM
Hey Klaas,

Any word on when the water search will begin?  TIA

Crazymom - someone reported at BFN that it won't be until October now.  Not sure of all the details.  I think Red will have more information some time this week.

GOODNIGHT ALL!

Wow. :sad: October?  Won't this family get any resolution?  Just what I needed this week was more bad news! :sad: :sad: :sad:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: LilPuma on August 06, 2007, 02:28:46 AM
So the three amigoes and daddy dearest aren't in the pokey yet?   :shock:  What did those Dutch investigators do, leave Aruba and go to Disney World?    :-x 

I seem to only make it in here during the wee hours and I still don't know how to use some of these spiffy bells and whistles.   :2doh:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: LilPuma on August 06, 2007, 02:33:56 AM
So it's me and 10 guests and those guests couldn't talk to me if they wanted to.  Like they can't tell me what FTP is or why there's a teletype button.   :-?  I'm so behind everyone on this new forum because I haven't been here much since the grand opening. 

Well, Minkeys, I hope  you all have a great week and maybe I'll try hitting Glow just for the fun of it. 


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: Hotshot on August 06, 2007, 06:23:01 AM
Hey Klaas,

Any word on when the water search will begin?  TIA

Crazymom - someone reported at BFN that it won't be until October now.  Not sure of all the details.  I think Red will have more information some time this week.

GOODNIGHT ALL!
And how did I know that would happen?  I personally don't think it will ever take place.  I want it to, very badly, but.....things just keep getting in the way.   :-?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: San on August 06, 2007, 07:31:24 AM
Hey Klaas,

Any word on when the water search will begin?  TIA

Crazymom - someone reported at BFN that it won't be until October now.  Not sure of all the details.  I think Red will have more information some time this week.

GOODNIGHT ALL!
And how did I know that would happen?  I personally don't think it will ever take place.  I want it to, very badly, but.....things just keep getting in the way.   :-?

I agree.

Good Morning Everyone


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: Easywriter on August 06, 2007, 07:35:57 AM
Hey Klaas,

Any word on when the water search will begin?  TIA

Crazymom - someone reported at BFN that it won't be until October now.  Not sure of all the details.  I think Red will have more information some time this week.

GOODNIGHT ALL!
And how did I know that would happen?  I personally don't think it will ever take place.  I want it to, very badly, but.....things just keep getting in the way.   :-?

Hard not to get a little disillusioned about that search.  I’m sure there are many obstacles to overcome, but it is starting to look a little hopeless.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: Easywriter on August 06, 2007, 07:37:15 AM
Hey Klaas,

Any word on when the water search will begin?  TIA

Crazymom - someone reported at BFN that it won't be until October now.  Not sure of all the details.  I think Red will have more information some time this week.

GOODNIGHT ALL!
And how did I know that would happen?  I personally don't think it will ever take place.  I want it to, very badly, but.....things just keep getting in the way.   :-?

I agree.

Good Morning Everyone

I agree too!

Good Morning San!


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: San on August 06, 2007, 07:50:41 AM
Hey Klaas,

Any word on when the water search will begin?  TIA

Crazymom - someone reported at BFN that it won't be until October now.  Not sure of all the details.  I think Red will have more information some time this week.

GOODNIGHT ALL!
And how did I know that would happen?  I personally don't think it will ever take place.  I want it to, very badly, but.....things just keep getting in the way.   :-?

I agree.

Good Morning Everyone

I agree too!

Good Morning San!

Good Morning Easy.  It's such a disappointment.  I should know better and not get disappointment but you just can't help thinking that something might go this families way for once.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: Easywriter on August 06, 2007, 08:03:17 AM
Hey Klaas,

Any word on when the water search will begin?  TIA

Crazymom - someone reported at BFN that it won't be until October now.  Not sure of all the details.  I think Red will have more information some time this week.

GOODNIGHT ALL!
And how did I know that would happen?  I personally don't think it will ever take place.  I want it to, very badly, but.....things just keep getting in the way.   :-?

I agree.

Good Morning Everyone

I agree too!

Good Morning San!

Good Morning Easy.  It's such a disappointment.  I should know better and not get disappointment but you just can't help thinking that something might go this families way for once.

Yeah, it's like Dave said very early on they just couldn't get a break and that theme continues.  I so hoped the deep water search would discover something that would make a difference in all of this.  Now, I wonder if it will ever even happen.  The Dutch will probably make some generic statement next month and then wipe their hands of the whole thing and that will be that.  Unless a drunk Joran spills his guts to the wrong person one of these days.

I know none of those people have any normal feelings, but I hope a higher power puts Natalee into their dreams night after night after night until it slowly drives them mad.......


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: nonesuche on August 06, 2007, 08:16:46 AM
Good Morning everyone-

This has been my fear for two years frankly, for Holland simply isn't a country that seems to give a flip regarding anything external to their country or their outposts in the Antilles. They don't give a flip about Saddam or Oosama, why would they care about one murder? I don't mean to minimalize Natalee in any way but sadly, I believe anything and all that has been done to date was for tourism's sake. No other reason.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: Easywriter on August 06, 2007, 08:27:02 AM
Good Morning everyone-

This has been my fear for two years frankly, for Holland simply isn't a country that seems to give a flip regarding anything external to their country or their outposts in the Antilles. They don't give a flip about Saddam or Oosama, why would they care about one murder? I don't mean to minimalize Natalee in any way but sadly, I believe anything and all that has been done to date was for tourism's sake. No other reason.

Yep, some bad choices were made for the sake of tourism and then it shifted into CYA mode.

Been thinking about this Lorenzo thing and doesn't "private mediation" sound a whole lot like a plea bargain?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 06, 2007, 08:32:53 AM
Good Morning everyone-

This has been my fear for two years frankly, for Holland simply isn't a country that seems to give a flip regarding anything external to their country or their outposts in the Antilles. They don't give a flip about Saddam or Oosama, why would they care about one murder? I don't mean to minimalize Natalee in any way but sadly, I believe anything and all that has been done to date was for tourism's sake. No other reason.

Yep, some bad choices were made for the sake of tourism and then it shifted into CYA mode.

Been thinking about this Lorenzo thing and doesn't "private mediation" sound a whole lot like a plea bargain?


I wonder how many guards are staked out around his compound.......


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: Easywriter on August 06, 2007, 08:36:13 AM
Good Morning everyone-

This has been my fear for two years frankly, for Holland simply isn't a country that seems to give a flip regarding anything external to their country or their outposts in the Antilles. They don't give a flip about Saddam or Oosama, why would they care about one murder? I don't mean to minimalize Natalee in any way but sadly, I believe anything and all that has been done to date was for tourism's sake. No other reason.

Yep, some bad choices were made for the sake of tourism and then it shifted into CYA mode.

Been thinking about this Lorenzo thing and doesn't "private mediation" sound a whole lot like a plea bargain?


I wonder how many guards are staked out around his compound.......

Serving drive-thru customers? lol

Something about this doesn't match what we have been told about their "system." imo


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: nonesuche on August 06, 2007, 08:44:46 AM
Easy you are exactly right, none of this matches but then Arlene and Cohen and all the others that were trotted out to LIE were nothing but spin and PR. There is no truth in happy Aruba, only drugs and porn and decadence. THAT is why Natalee isn't with us today, the culture there worships and thrives on all things dark and decadent.

Hence people like Renfro and Charles Croes are 'somebody' there, they are part of this newer regime. I think this is exactly what Jossy has been fighting and also so angry about, I am sick of hearing others portray it as his own dark motivations. I think he's watched this island become a festering cesspool of no leadership with character, and whatever rings your bell - drugs, porn, even kidnapping and murder. I'd leave if it were me but I don't have businesses there to protect as he does.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: Leslie on August 06, 2007, 08:47:23 AM
Amigoe
http://www.amigoe.com/english/
BonDia
http://www.cspnv.com/
Solo di Pueblo
http://www.solodipueblo.com/
Aruba Today
http://www.arubatoday.com/
24ora
http://www.24ora.com/
Translator:
http://papiamentu.donamaro.nl


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: Easywriter on August 06, 2007, 08:50:12 AM
Easy you are exactly right, none of this matches but then Arlene and Cohen and all the others that were trotted out to LIE were nothing but spin and PR. There is no truth in happy Aruba, only drugs and porn and decadence. THAT is why Natalee isn't with us today, the culture there worships and thrives on all things dark and decadent.

Hence people like Renfro and Charles Croes are 'somebody' there, they are part of this newer regime. I think this is exactly what Jossy has been fighting and also so angry about, I am sick of hearing others portray it as his own dark motivations. I think he's watched this island become a festering cesspool of no leadership with character, and whatever rings your bell - drugs, porn, even kidnapping and murder. I'd leave if it were me but I don't have businesses there to protect as he does.

He has said many times it is not the place he once loved. 

I noticed several at the other boards were talking about their annual trips to Aruba coming up.  My first thought was that is another very good reason not to go to that island! lol


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: Leslie on August 06, 2007, 09:05:14 AM
Taking forever for me to post into the forum this morning and one of the links was cut off:
Dairio
http://www.diario-aruba.com/2007/8/6/


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: Rammstein on August 06, 2007, 09:12:40 AM
Good Morning everyone-

This has been my fear for two years frankly, for Holland simply isn't a country that seems to give a flip regarding anything external to their country or their outposts in the Antilles. They don't give a flip about Saddam or Oosama, why would they care about one murder? I don't mean to minimalize Natalee in any way but sadly, I believe anything and all that has been done to date was for tourism's sake. No other reason.

I am sorry but that is nonsense. We don't give a flip about Saddam or Osama? Right, tell that to the parents/famlly of Tom Krist, Jos Leunissen, Timo Smeehuijzen, Cor Stirk, Robert Donkers, Dijkstra, Michael Donkervoort, Jan van Twist, Bart van Boxtel, Dave Steensma and  Jeroen Severs, dutch men who laid down their lives for the cause in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Tell that to the dutch troops who served in Iraq (like my brother in law), tell the dutch troops who now serve in Afghanistan, tell that to the dutch special forces hunting Osama in the hills of Afghanistan or our army/navy/airforce around the world fighting the war on Terror.

And FYI, the internal problems of Aruba are not something the Netherlands (because there is no Holland) can fix or alter.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: Leslie on August 06, 2007, 09:17:21 AM
I meant to type DIARIO not dairio! 


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: wreck on August 06, 2007, 09:25:57 AM
Good Morning everyone-

This has been my fear for two years frankly, for Holland simply isn't a country that seems to give a flip regarding anything external to their country or their outposts in the Antilles. They don't give a flip about Saddam or Oosama, why would they care about one murder? I don't mean to minimalize Natalee in any way but sadly, I believe anything and all that has been done to date was for tourism's sake. No other reason.

I am sorry but that is nonsense. We don't give a flip about Saddam or Osama? Right, tell that to the parents/famlly of Tom Krist, Jos Leunissen, Timo Smeehuijzen, Cor Stirk, Robert Donkers, Dijkstra, Michael Donkervoort, Jan van Twist, Bart van Boxtel, Dave Steensma and  Jeroen Severs, dutch men who laid down their lives for the cause in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Tell that to the dutch troops who served in Iraq (like my brother in law), tell the dutch troops who now serve in Afghanistan, tell that to the dutch special forces hunting Osama in the hills of Afghanistan or our army/navy/airforce around the world fighting the war on Terror.

And FYI, the internal problems of Aruba are not something the Netherlands (because there is no Holland) can fix or alter.
Thank-you for that. It seems people are a little gloomy this morning. There are still a few of us here that do think the Dutch are going to solve this -- we just have to be patient. After 2+ years, they cannot come in and simply wrap things up in a few months. They must do everything 100% accurate and get things right. It is very hard to follow this case and not be frustrated -- I certainly understand the pessimism here.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: nonesuche on August 06, 2007, 09:26:59 AM
tell the dark siders we won't stop them from going, we want them to go, wild horses shouldn't stop them.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: nonesuche on August 06, 2007, 09:39:45 AM
Good Morning everyone-

This has been my fear for two years frankly, for Holland simply isn't a country that seems to give a flip regarding anything external to their country or their outposts in the Antilles. They don't give a flip about Saddam or Oosama, why would they care about one murder? I don't mean to minimalize Natalee in any way but sadly, I believe anything and all that has been done to date was for tourism's sake. No other reason.

I am sorry but that is nonsense. We don't give a flip about Saddam or Osama? Right, tell that to the parents/famlly of Tom Krist, Jos Leunissen, Timo Smeehuijzen, Cor Stirk, Robert Donkers, Dijkstra, Michael Donkervoort, Jan van Twist, Bart van Boxtel, Dave Steensma and  Jeroen Severs, dutch men who laid down their lives for the cause in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Tell that to the dutch troops who served in Iraq (like my brother in law), tell the dutch troops who now serve in Afghanistan, tell that to the dutch special forces hunting Osama in the hills of Afghanistan or our army/navy/airforce around the world fighting the war on Terror.

And FYI, the internal problems of Aruba are not something the Netherlands (because there is no Holland) can fix or alter.

Ramm-

I will tell my late husband who went over in the first wave of the Gulf War, I do pray to him. I also think the level of commitment that Holland has made to the middle east strife is far and away from that of the US, England, even Austrailia. It's not a personal slam at you or your family, it's unfortunate you take it as such. For that I'm sorry, just as I won't take insult my Rick likely died of cancer due to his exposure to spent uranium from missle casings, ok?

I won't touch on the impact the open immigration policy in Holland has had on the rise of radical muslim factions, that's a whole other story, and well documented. Maybe SB can come and speak to some of this, he like me actually does care about the global impacts of the country in which our World Court resides has created at least in part. No country is immune Ramm, the US takes a beating for every decision me make that is good or bad, GLOBALLY we are bashed without end. Sorry but some of you need to toughen up, it isn't always about you, but sometimes about issues far beyond you.


I have been to three cities in Holland at various times in my life, and twice to Aruba.

I appreciate the work on the translations you've done Ramm but there's a reason I don't post at BFN, I chose not to tangle with you there, I'd ask you to please put me on ignore here, Thank you.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: Easywriter on August 06, 2007, 09:39:53 AM
Would Lorenzo be considered a Dutch National?


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on August 06, 2007, 09:41:42 AM
Good Morning everyone-

This has been my fear for two years frankly, for Holland simply isn't a country that seems to give a flip regarding anything external to their country or their outposts in the Antilles. They don't give a flip about Saddam or Oosama, why would they care about one murder? I don't mean to minimalize Natalee in any way but sadly, I believe anything and all that has been done to date was for tourism's sake. No other reason.

Yep, some bad choices were made for the sake of tourism and then it shifted into CYA mode.

Been thinking about this Lorenzo thing and doesn't "private mediation" sound a whole lot like a plea bargain?


Good morning Monks!

Astute observation! It is a shame they didn't choose to mediate with the perps in Natalee's case. Aruba could have saved themselves some money.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on August 06, 2007, 09:45:05 AM

Thank-you for that. It seems people are a little gloomy this morning. There are still a few of us here that do think the Dutch are going to solve this -- we just have to be patient. After 2+ years, they cannot come in and simply wrap things up in a few months. They must do everything 100% accurate and get things right. It is very hard to follow this case and not be frustrated -- I certainly understand the pessimism here.


I'm with you and Bots, Wreck. IMO they'd have closed it a long time ago if they weren't going to do anything. Pardon my optimism, but just to believe until proven different.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: Easywriter on August 06, 2007, 09:51:10 AM
I hope that something comes of the Dutch involvment, but they have been involved for a long time now.  They had all the files for months before they went to Aruba.  I'm afraid it is all going to come down to no body.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: San on August 06, 2007, 09:59:14 AM
I hope that something comes of the Dutch involvment, but they have been involved for a long time now.  They had all the files for months before they went to Aruba.  I'm afraid it is all going to come down to no body.

I agree Easy.  The final word comes from the Aruban prosecutor not the KLPD.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: Mere on August 06, 2007, 10:05:56 AM
Good morning folks....I still believe in miracles....so I still have hope that there will be a
resolution of this case....that the family will have Natalee and that they will know what
happened.

I would also like to take a look at the website of the company that is providing the boats
for the water search.  If it is the company that has worked off of the Louisiana and Texas coasts, they are a big operation.  Does anyone remember the name? TY....Mere


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: San on August 06, 2007, 10:15:10 AM
Good Morning everyone-

This has been my fear for two years frankly, for Holland simply isn't a country that seems to give a flip regarding anything external to their country or their outposts in the Antilles. They don't give a flip about Saddam or Oosama, why would they care about one murder? I don't mean to minimalize Natalee in any way but sadly, I believe anything and all that has been done to date was for tourism's sake. No other reason.

I am sorry but that is nonsense. We don't give a flip about Saddam or Osama? Right, tell that to the parents/famlly of Tom Krist, Jos Leunissen, Timo Smeehuijzen, Cor Stirk, Robert Donkers, Dijkstra, Michael Donkervoort, Jan van Twist, Bart van Boxtel, Dave Steensma and  Jeroen Severs, dutch men who laid down their lives for the cause in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Tell that to the dutch troops who served in Iraq (like my brother in law), tell the dutch troops who now serve in Afghanistan, tell that to the dutch special forces hunting Osama in the hills of Afghanistan or our army/navy/airforce around the world fighting the war on Terror.

And FYI, the internal problems of Aruba are not something the Netherlands  (because there is no Holland) can fix or alter.

Ramm, if the problems can't be fixed by the Netherlands why did they agree to investigate this case when they know that the prosecutor would have the final word.

Do you believe that the KLPD's investigation will get results.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: San on August 06, 2007, 10:22:08 AM
Good morning folks....I still believe in miracles....so I still have hope that there will be a
resolution of this case....that the family will have Natalee and that they will know what
happened.

I would also like to take a look at the website of the company that is providing the boats
for the water search.  If it is the company that has worked off of the Louisiana and Texas coasts, they are a big operation.  Does anyone remember the name? TY....Mere

Here you go Mere.

http://www.superioroffshore.com/


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: Easywriter on August 06, 2007, 10:22:59 AM
It occurs to me that if as much effort was put into making a case as has been put into coming up with reasons not to, this case would have progressed.  Instead it is in a perpetual loop.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: San on August 06, 2007, 10:27:32 AM
Are we ever going to get to page 50 :shock:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: ospainter on August 06, 2007, 10:28:35 AM
i hope


os


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: ospainter on August 06, 2007, 10:29:26 AM
Maybe now

OS


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: ospainter on August 06, 2007, 10:30:00 AM
or now

OS


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: San on August 06, 2007, 10:30:43 AM
or now

OS

 :lol:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: ospainter on August 06, 2007, 10:31:14 AM
where is everyone???

OS


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: San on August 06, 2007, 10:32:04 AM
where is everyone???

OS

Some people are in Chat.


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: ospainter on August 06, 2007, 10:32:08 AM
ok here we go

OS


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: Easywriter on August 06, 2007, 10:32:11 AM
Soon, soon...... lol


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: ospainter on August 06, 2007, 10:33:53 AM
now for real, i was just teasing before,

OS


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: ospainter on August 06, 2007, 10:34:32 AM
wrong again

OS


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: ospainter on August 06, 2007, 10:35:48 AM
Heck, I might make 500 posts before we get there, lol

OS


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: BUCKSHOT on August 06, 2007, 10:36:51 AM
If Deepak had his car's interior swapped out at Automotive Enterprises, would it be a coincidence that an Automotive Enterprise worker, who happened to be American, was found dead by suicide after locking himself inside of a storage container? Things that make you go hmmmmm........

Those who assisted with the cover-up, may seem to come up dead. by suicide. Columbian Necktie, Pitbull, etc........

Is this a plausible train of thought? Comments...............


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on August 06, 2007, 10:37:11 AM
Come on...papa needs a new pair of shoes....50!


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: ospainter on August 06, 2007, 10:37:34 AM
I think we can, I think we can

OS


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: San on August 06, 2007, 10:37:36 AM
Heck, I might make 500 posts before we get there, lol

OS

For a minute I thought you said 500 pounds. :lol:


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: ospainter on August 06, 2007, 10:38:24 AM
there ya go

OS


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on August 06, 2007, 10:38:27 AM
Morning

Just for the record.. I got an email last night.. Bhamom thinks I am posting at RU under the name ShortChuck or something like that?
 Hate to disapoint her.. but its not me.!!
I wasnt home all day yesterday and was no where near a pc.  :-x



Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: San on August 06, 2007, 10:38:36 AM
(http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d118/Sanddrops/Scared%20Monkeys/nowlocked.jpg)

Please move to LCD #674

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=1982.0


Title: Re: Lively Case Discussion #673 8/3 - 8/5/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on August 06, 2007, 10:38:54 AM
There I helped.   :cool: