Scared Monkeys Discussion Forum

Natalee Holloway => LCD Archive => Topic started by: klaasend on June 29, 2006, 10:08:50 AM



Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on June 29, 2006, 10:08:50 AM
You all know the rules


(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/InHonorofNatalee.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Dihannah1 on June 29, 2006, 01:08:21 PM
First?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on June 29, 2006, 01:08:34 PM
You mean you no like my cooking receipts, San? :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: San on June 29, 2006, 01:08:46 PM
Second :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Dihannah1 on June 29, 2006, 01:09:02 PM
Yeeeeah, my first time for being first....  I'm heading to lunch now.... see ya'll in a while.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: San on June 29, 2006, 01:09:55 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
You mean you no like my cooking receipts, San? :lol:

I loved your neatly typed cooking recipes. :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: San on June 29, 2006, 01:10:50 PM
Quote from: "Dihannah1"
Yeeeeah, my first time for being first....  I'm heading to lunch now.... see ya'll in a while.

You cheated you said you we leaving :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on June 29, 2006, 01:11:48 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
You mean you no like my cooking receipts, San? :lol:

I loved your neatly typed cooking recipes. :wink:


My former housekeeper was Spanish speaking.  Back when I cooked a lot, she would tell me, "Mssush, I like you cooking reciepts."  

I always made an abundance over the weekends, so she would have leftovers that I froze to take home with her.  I am not sure if she liked them or she just liked the leisure of warming them up.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: San on June 29, 2006, 01:13:10 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
You mean you no like my cooking receipts, San? :lol:

I loved your neatly typed cooking recipes. :wink:


My former housekeeper was Spanish speaking.  Back when I cooked a lot, she would tell me, "Mssush, I like you cooking reciepts."  

I always made an abundance over the weekends, so she would have leftovers that I froze to take home with her.  I am not sure if she liked them or she just liked the leisure of warming them up.

Both.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Peaches on June 29, 2006, 01:13:32 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Dihannah1"
Yeeeeah, my first time for being first....  I'm heading to lunch now.... see ya'll in a while.

You cheated you said you we leaving :lol:


Cheater, cheater, booger eater.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on June 29, 2006, 01:14:08 PM
SAN - I'm hoping AM Digital has an article about the witness today  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on June 29, 2006, 01:14:58 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
SAN - I'm hoping AM Digital has an article about the witness today  :wink:


Oh, yeah.  We can read them.   :lol:   We depend on Sandy and Whytegirl a whole bunch. :oops:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Mere on June 29, 2006, 01:15:55 PM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Dihannah1"
Yeeeeah, my first time for being first....  I'm heading to lunch now.... see ya'll in a while.

You cheated you said you we leaving :lol:


Cheater, cheater, booger eater.


 :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on June 29, 2006, 01:18:30 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "klaasend"
SAN - I'm hoping AM Digital has an article about the witness today  :wink:


Oh, yeah.  We can read them.   :lol:   We depend on Sandy and Whytegirl a whole bunch. :oops:


AM Digital is in english.  It comes as a PDF file but it can't be posted as a link in the forum because it's membership only.  If there's an article, I'll snag and post it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: San on June 29, 2006, 01:19:06 PM
Last time the cleaning lady came I had to go to therapy and when I cam back she was in a panic because she blew a fuse near where my nephew has his fish tank hooked up and she though she was going to kill the fish :lol: .  Then when she turned the vacuum on I forgot to tell her my dogs attack the vacuum :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Anna on June 29, 2006, 01:20:22 PM
.

Mrs Red,
You may have to order the cookbooks in multiples like ten at a time but seems like there are that many needed.

My sister was entitled to take mine and gave the following explanations:

She entertains and I don't
She hosts family dinners sometimes and I don't
She belongs to a supper club and I don't
I only reared boys and so am only a "meat and potatoes" kind of cook and she enjoys trying new things.

So you see, she had every right to it and I don't.   :roll: What are sisters for?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: San on June 29, 2006, 01:22:23 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
SAN - I'm hoping AM Digital has an article about the witness today  :wink:

Haven't received anything yet.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Sue on June 29, 2006, 01:23:00 PM

Im here


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: San on June 29, 2006, 01:27:59 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
.

Mrs Red,
You may have to order the cookbooks in multiples like ten at a time but seems like there are that many needed.

My sister was entitled to take mine and gave the following explanations:

She entertains and I don't
She hosts family dinners sometimes and I don't
She belongs to a supper club and I don't
I only reared boys and so am only a "meat and potatoes" kind of cook and she enjoys trying new things.

So you see, she had every right to it and I don't.   :roll: What are sisters for?

She sounds like my sister.  I ordered a new pair of sandles and somehow she walked out with them :shock:   She said I don't wear sandles like her because I'm always in sneakers and she hates sneakers.  How's that for reasoning :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on June 29, 2006, 01:34:41 PM
Quote from: "San"
Last time the cleaning lady came I had to go to therapy and when I cam back she was in a panic because she blew a fuse near where my nephew has his fish tank hooked up and she though she was going to kill the fish :lol: .  Then when she turned the vacuum on I forgot to tell her my dogs attack the vacuum :lol:
:lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on June 29, 2006, 01:37:26 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Anna"
.

Mrs Red,
You may have to order the cookbooks in multiples like ten at a time but seems like there are that many needed.

My sister was entitled to take mine and gave the following explanations:

She entertains and I don't
She hosts family dinners sometimes and I don't
She belongs to a supper club and I don't
I only reared boys and so am only a "meat and potatoes" kind of cook and she enjoys trying new things.

So you see, she had every right to it and I don't.   :roll: What are sisters for?

She sounds like my sister.  I ordered a new pair of sandles and somehow she walked out with them :shock:   She said I don't wear sandles like her because I'm always in sneakers and she hates sneakers.  How's that for reasoning :lol:


Perhaps I am fortunate that my sisters live far away, travel a great deal but I do remember my sister (the one who modeled and has it all) thinking a blue blouse with spaghetti straps I had, looked much better on her since she is so "naturally tan", than it did on me with my pale skin, how it made me look "washed out," so she felt obligated to take it, so I would feel better about my pasty color.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: San on June 29, 2006, 01:39:48 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "San"

She sounds like my sister.  I ordered a new pair of sandles and somehow she walked out with them :shock:   She said I don't wear sandles like her because I'm always in sneakers and she hates sneakers.  How's that for reasoning :lol:


Perhaps I am fortunate that my sisters live far away, travel a great deal but I do remember my sister (the one who modeled and has it all) thinking a blue blouse with spaghetti straps I had, looked much better on her since she is so "naturally tan", than it did on me with my pale skin, how it made me look "washed out," so she felt obligated to take it, so I would feel better about my pasty color.

 :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Nut44x4 on June 29, 2006, 01:46:04 PM
Excellent translation of article, but what about so called evidence the so called witness (now labeled as liar) gave.....and I am not talking about the so called used condomn, gag me, that is gross....lol


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on June 29, 2006, 01:48:29 PM
OK, I am going outside and sit in the shade, read some, enjoy the scenery, watch the birds from the corner of my eye and absorb the moment in time.  It's historical in my life that I come here to meet with loving, giving and caring people, but it is also historical in my life that I savor each moment in the garden that I can.  I can sit in the shade and not have to worry about my husband's lectures about getting too hot, I can watch the birds drink and bathe at the fountain, think of how the land where I lived was once inhabited by plantation owners and the African-Americans who picked cotton here and ponder what their thoughts were on a day like today and what would they have been doing.  Were they singing spiritual songs with a low country flavor or were they awaiting the time off to be with their families and think 200 years from now, if any of my roses will still be here and if so, will those who come here, wonder what the owner of this land must have been doing at this same time of day, long ago when computers were new and consumed a whole corner of the room in order to accommodate monitors, speakers, printers, hard drives, and a big desk to hide the bazilion cords attached thereto.  Will they ponder why air filght was so crude or will they be back in the place where African-Americans once were, tilling the soil.  Will time take us back to place we once were.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Peaches on June 29, 2006, 01:55:48 PM
Great post, TG.

Makes me think of my favorite hymn.  "In the Garden".

Of course, that song always makes me boohoo so I'm going to go commute and boohoo in my car as I hear that song in my head and think of the dew still on the roses.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on June 29, 2006, 02:00:34 PM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Great post, TG.

Makes me think of my favorite hymn.  "In the Garden".

Of course, that song always makes me boohoo so I'm going to go commute and boohoo in my car as I hear that song in my head and think of the dew still on the roses.


My Grandmas fav too my best friend (an Opera Singer) sang it at her funeral service not a dry eye in the place! :cry:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Easywriter on June 29, 2006, 02:19:24 PM
I ate too much lunch and now I just want to hide under my desk until quiting time!

Sure Happy It's Thursday!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on June 29, 2006, 02:20:35 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
I ate too much lunch and now I just want to hide under my desk until quiting time!

Sure Happy It's Thursday!


My old admin who worked a four day week used to say that all the time!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Easywriter on June 29, 2006, 02:27:07 PM
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
I ate too much lunch and now I just want to hide under my desk until quiting time!

Sure Happy It's Thursday!


My old admin who worked a four day week used to say that all the time!


Well, I will be working tomorrow and I will be working Monday.  The 4th fell on a rotten day this year!  That will make it like two Mondays next week....  :cry:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Anna on June 29, 2006, 02:31:41 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
[
Well, I will be working tomorrow and I will be working Monday.  The 4th fell on a rotten day this year!  That will make it like two Mondays next week....  :cry:



Ah, cheer up!  Dogs and cattle want to be fed EVERY day!  But I am thankful that I am not a dairy farmer.  They have to get up at four a.m. so things can always be worse.  Could be better but sure could be worse.

 :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Anna on June 29, 2006, 02:34:31 PM
.  That Tyler is sitting outside pretending it's not 100 degrees!  :roll: Hope she took a cold beverage.

Off to work again and giving thanks for inventions such as air conditioning!
I can't imagine this particular summer without it.  Or don't want to imagine that!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: AZLady on June 29, 2006, 02:38:17 PM
Is everyone leaving now?  I wanted to talk about something that's been bothering me for a week, ever since I heard Jossy on the internet radio show.  Jossy said that the ALE KNOW Natalee was at Joran's apartment.  They KNOW this.  I wonder how they know it.  What evidence do they have?  Has anyone heard?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on June 29, 2006, 02:39:57 PM
Quote from: "AZLady"
Is everyone leaving now?  I wanted to talk about something that's been bothering me for a week, ever since I heard Jossy on the internet radio show.  Jossy said that the ALE KNOW Natalee was at Joran's apartment.  They KNOW this.  I wonder how they know it.  What evidence do they have?  Has anyone heard?


that is a very good question!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: AZLady on June 29, 2006, 02:41:00 PM
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"
Quote from: "AZLady"
Is everyone leaving now?  I wanted to talk about something that's been bothering me for a week, ever since I heard Jossy on the internet radio show.  Jossy said that the ALE KNOW Natalee was at Joran's apartment.  They KNOW this.  I wonder how they know it.  What evidence do they have?  Has anyone heard?


that is a very good question!


Well, Mermaid, I guess we are full of questions with no answers, huh?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: AZLady on June 29, 2006, 02:42:37 PM
EASYWRITER:
When you talk to your friend in Aruba, could you ask how the police KNOW that Natalee was at Joran's apartment?  Would you ask if he knows what evidence they have and if he can tell us what it is?
Thanks


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: AZLady on June 29, 2006, 02:43:24 PM
I guess I'll go sit in the garden, like Tyler.  See ya later, Monks.  It's nappy time.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Dihannah1 on June 29, 2006, 02:47:38 PM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Dihannah1"
Yeeeeah, my first time for being first....  I'm heading to lunch now.... see ya'll in a while.

You cheated you said you we leaving :lol:


Cheater, cheater, booger eater.


I may eat boogers, but I SWEAR I DON'T cheat!  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Easywriter on June 29, 2006, 02:52:15 PM
Just a few thoughts that have crossed my mind since yesterday afternoon:

Yesterday as soon as I learned the Columbian witness had admitted he had not been telling the truth, I shared that information with the rest of you.  I was just as frustrated by this turn of events as anyone else and you can believe my source was as well.  The whole story just became another spoke in this never ending wheel Aruba inaptly named a legal system. The whole episode has probably turned out to be another complete waste of time and I am sure only caused that much more anguish for Natalee’s family.

Being fully aware of the impact this story has probably had on the whole investigation, I must ask if it would be better not to follow every possible lead.  Would it be better not to seek out information from those that know the island of Aruba very well, because of the risk that a story might not pan out?  Or, is it better to leave no stone unturned and avail one’s self to any credible source willing to share information?

I’m not sure anymore, because of the reaction to the news yesterday, both here and at other forums.  Maybe it would be best to just wait for Fox to create some “Breaking News” in this case, while I keep what I learn to myself.

Any comments?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Mere on June 29, 2006, 02:54:12 PM
Quote from: "AZLady"
Is everyone leaving now?  I wanted to talk about something that's been bothering me for a week, ever since I heard Jossy on the internet radio show.  Jossy said that the ALE KNOW Natalee was at Joran's apartment.  They KNOW this.  I wonder how they know it.  What evidence do they have?  Has anyone heard?


AZ....I always felt that Anita's ability to describe N's underwear indicated that she had seen them...even though she was in Holland at the time of the disappearance....I think she was part of the "clean up" team....this is JMHO


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on June 29, 2006, 02:59:24 PM
Quote from: "AZLady"
Is everyone leaving now?  I wanted to talk about something that's been bothering me for a week, ever since I heard Jossy on the internet radio show.  Jossy said that the ALE KNOW Natalee was at Joran's apartment.  They KNOW this.  I wonder how they know it.  What evidence do they have?  Has anyone heard?


We haven't discussed that at all, have we? and I did hear that...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: wreck on June 29, 2006, 02:59:46 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Just a few thoughts that have crossed my mind since yesterday afternoon:

Yesterday as soon as I learned the Columbian witness had admitted he had not been telling the truth, I shared that information with the rest of you.  I was just as frustrated by this turn of events as anyone else and you can believe my source was as well.  The whole story just became another spoke in this never ending wheel Aruba inaptly named a legal system. The whole episode has probably turned out to be another complete waste of time and I am sure only caused that much more anguish for Natalee’s family.

Being fully aware of the impact this story has probably had on the whole investigation, I must ask if it would be better not to follow every possible lead.  Would it be better not to seek out information from those that know the island of Aruba very well, because of the risk that a story might not pan out?  Or, is it better to leave no stone unturned and avail one’s self to any credible source willing to share information?

I’m not sure anymore, because of the reaction to the news yesterday, both here and at other forums.  Maybe it would be best to just wait for Fox to create some “Breaking News” in this case, while I keep what I learn to myself.

Any comments?

Like I said yesterday, the last thing I want to do is question your source's veracity or well-intentions. What we don't know is the veracity and intentions of your "source's" source! I just don't trust ANY inside info coming from there anymore.
That said, I still want to hear EVERY rumor that is being floated or postulated from there.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on June 29, 2006, 03:01:31 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Just a few thoughts that have crossed my mind since yesterday afternoon:

Yesterday as soon as I learned the Columbian witness had admitted he had not been telling the truth, I shared that information with the rest of you.  I was just as frustrated by this turn of events as anyone else and you can believe my source was as well.  The whole story just became another spoke in this never ending wheel Aruba inaptly named a legal system. The whole episode has probably turned out to be another complete waste of time and I am sure only caused that much more anguish for Natalee’s family.

Being fully aware of the impact this story has probably had on the whole investigation, I must ask if it would be better not to follow every possible lead.  Would it be better not to seek out information from those that know the island of Aruba very well, because of the risk that a story might not pan out?  Or, is it better to leave no stone unturned and avail one’s self to any credible source willing to share information?

I’m not sure anymore, because of the reaction to the news yesterday, both here and at other forums.  Maybe it would be best to just wait for Fox to create some “Breaking News” in this case, while I keep what I learn to myself.

Any comments?


as long as like your friend, they are credible.... I believe they are saying the witness lied... and I believe the witness may not be... make sense??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Mere on June 29, 2006, 03:02:33 PM
Easy....I don't know the answer....but, if we only looked at or discussed solid information, there would be little to discuss.  I don't think that the witness lying is particularly disappointing....we can cut him loose....we have all learned a lot about Aruba....your associate seems to be honest....let's keep going....Mere


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: tcumom on June 29, 2006, 03:04:34 PM
Easy ~ I appreciate so very much when you share your information with us ~ be it discouraging, hopeful, whatever it is.....it's better than hearing nothing  :?

These days, I have come to rely on your info *for* any info .... probably makes no sense.  oh well.  Thanks.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Peaches on June 29, 2006, 03:05:17 PM
FM, did you order that CD we talked about the other day?  
I got mine.  It's fabulous.  Both CDs.  "Schoolhouse Rock Medley" really does rock.

I hope SSD got hers but I haven't seen her here to ask.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: sharon on June 29, 2006, 03:05:27 PM
PLUS -- we have not heard exactly what he was lying about.

There may be some truth -- JQK said the metal pipe was found.

I agree with Mrs Red -- if the source is reliable, it's better to know what is being said. But that's MO.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on June 29, 2006, 03:06:36 PM
Quote from: "Peaches"
FM, did you order that CD we talked about the other day?  
I got mine.  It's fabulous.  Both CDs.  "Schoolhouse Rock Medley" really does rock.

I hope SSD got hers but I haven't seen her here to ask.


OMG........

Does it have I'm just a Bill?  Sittin here on capital hill????? :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Peaches on June 29, 2006, 03:07:46 PM
sharon, could you re-post that link to the forum about the NY lawyers  again please.  I was  too busy at work to read it and now I'm home so I can.  TY


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Peaches on June 29, 2006, 03:08:58 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "Peaches"
FM, did you order that CD we talked about the other day?  
I got mine.  It's fabulous.  Both CDs.  "Schoolhouse Rock Medley" really does rock.

I hope SSD got hers but I haven't seen her here to ask.


OMG........

Does it have I'm just a Bill?  Sittin here on capital hill????? :lol:


YES!  
www.maxquartet.com
Part of the proceeds go to St. Jude's in Memphis.  I think SSD follows a child who is being treated there.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Kimmy53 on June 29, 2006, 03:10:33 PM
Quote from: "Dihannah1"
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Dihannah1"
Yeeeeah, my first time for being first....  I'm heading to lunch now.... see ya'll in a while.

You cheated you said you we leaving :lol:


Cheater, cheater, booger eater.


I may eat boogers, but I SWEAR I DON'T cheat!  :lol:


 :shock:  :shock:  :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Peaches on June 29, 2006, 03:11:36 PM
Quote from: "Kimmy53"
Quote from: "Dihannah1"
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Dihannah1"
Yeeeeah, my first time for being first....  I'm heading to lunch now.... see ya'll in a while.

You cheated you said you we leaving :lol:


Cheater, cheater, booger eater.


I may eat boogers, but I SWEAR I DON'T cheat!  :lol:


 :shock:  :shock:  :shock:


I was just kidding, Dihannah!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on June 29, 2006, 03:14:55 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Just a few thoughts that have crossed my mind since yesterday afternoon:

Yesterday as soon as I learned the Columbian witness had admitted he had not been telling the truth, I shared that information with the rest of you.  I was just as frustrated by this turn of events as anyone else and you can believe my source was as well.  The whole story just became another spoke in this never ending wheel Aruba inaptly named a legal system. The whole episode has probably turned out to be another complete waste of time and I am sure only caused that much more anguish for Natalee’s family.

Being fully aware of the impact this story has probably had on the whole investigation, I must ask if it would be better not to follow every possible lead.  Would it be better not to seek out information from those that know the island of Aruba very well, because of the risk that a story might not pan out?  Or, is it better to leave no stone unturned and avail one’s self to any credible source willing to share information?

I’m not sure anymore, because of the reaction to the news yesterday, both here and at other forums.  Maybe it would be best to just wait for Fox to create some “Breaking News” in this case, while I keep what I learn to myself.

Any comments?

To me, anything that keeps people interrested in the case, even if it doesn't pan out is a good thing.  The reason is, it keeps it in the news.  As long as the case is in the news there is still hope, IMO.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Kimmy53 on June 29, 2006, 03:18:20 PM
Easy, I have to say I agree with the others.  We need to hear what is going on - whether it helps the case or not, whether it turns out something or not.  Who knows when the real break will come.  I have faith that it will.... I just hate the waiting....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: sharon on June 29, 2006, 03:28:05 PM
Quote from: "Peaches"
sharon, could you re-post that link to the forum about the NY lawyers  again please.  I was  too busy at work to read it and now I'm home so I can.  TY


Here you go , Peaches. This was a comment posted on Michelle's blog http://arubanboycott.blogspot.com/.


Anonymous said...
The New York City Bar Association don't support the Forum Non Conveniens. Here is the link, http://www.abcny.org/Publications/reports/index.php?type=subject
Tue May 16, 08:10:39 AM EDT


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on June 29, 2006, 03:32:12 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Just a few thoughts that have crossed my mind since yesterday afternoon:

Yesterday as soon as I learned the Columbian witness had admitted he had not been telling the truth, I shared that information with the rest of you.  I was just as frustrated by this turn of events as anyone else and you can believe my source was as well.  The whole story just became another spoke in this never ending wheel Aruba inaptly named a legal system. The whole episode has probably turned out to be another complete waste of time and I am sure only caused that much more anguish for Natalee’s family.

Being fully aware of the impact this story has probably had on the whole investigation, I must ask if it would be better not to follow every possible lead.  Would it be better not to seek out information from those that know the island of Aruba very well, because of the risk that a story might not pan out?  Or, is it better to leave no stone unturned and avail one’s self to any credible source willing to share information?

I’m not sure anymore, because of the reaction to the news yesterday, both here and at other forums.  Maybe it would be best to just wait for Fox to create some “Breaking News” in this case, while I keep what I learn to myself.

Any comments?

To me, anything that keeps people interrested in the case, even if it doesn't pan out is a good thing.  The reason is, it keeps it in the news.  As long as the case is in the news there is still hope, IMO.


Not only that Klass, but the real main erason we visit boards like this is to have access to info not yet available to the general public.  There have been quite a few ocassions where news has been broken here first...far in advance of the MSM.  If we wanted to wait until a "Fox News Alert", we'd do so in front of a TV...not a computer screen.  Besides...hasn't the MSM been inaccurate with their reporting as well?  I think info otained and released in here is more authentic and accurate then what's reported out there...dig?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: terryd270 on June 29, 2006, 03:32:59 PM
hi Bobo2, Jacqueline, Kimmy53, MeMere, mrs. red, San, sharon, thik, thirdstrike, wreck and everyone else..  Sorry sharon, I wasn't ignoring you, I'm trying to do a few things at the same time and I'm afraid that I will mess up and send my post to my boss and my email to you..  

Easy, you need to keep the communications open, we can deal with the rumors and stuff.. Its being in limbo and silence that will kill us, we can work around the other stuff..

Sharon, I was very happy to watch the Heat when and I wish I could of been at the game and felt the excitement in Miami.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on June 29, 2006, 03:34:18 PM
Quote from: "terryd270"
hi Bobo2, Jacqueline, Kimmy53, MeMere, mrs. red, San, sharon, thik, thirdstrike, wreck and everyone else..  Sorry sharon, I wasn't ignoring you, I'm trying to do a few things at the same time and I'm afraid that I will mess up and send my post to my boss and my email to you..  

Easy, you need to keep the communications open, we can deal with the rumors and stuff.. Its being in limbo and silence that will kill us, we can work around the other stuff..

Sharon, I was very happy to watch the Heat when and I wish I could of been at the game and felt the excitement in Miami.


Hey Terry!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on June 29, 2006, 03:35:03 PM
Thirdstrike - exactly.  How many times have we watched MSM in amazement at their lack of knowledge in the case.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Easywriter on June 29, 2006, 03:38:46 PM
I just took a look at that “other” message board and some of those people actually think Beth Twitty spends her leisure time reading their posts.  Kind of reminds me of that public service announcement with the egg in a frying pan.  Whduhhellaredeezcrackheadson…


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: terryd270 on June 29, 2006, 03:38:47 PM
Hi Jacqueline!  I know I'm going to mess up soon and start sending out code to you guys and then you will know I'm crazy..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on June 29, 2006, 03:38:55 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Thirdstrike - exactly.  How many times have we watched MSM in amazement at their lack of knowledge in the case.


That's exactly the importance of an "underground" media source like this one!  If we lose that edge, we're nothing more then an extension of their  (the MSM) ignornaces...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on June 29, 2006, 03:39:56 PM
http://tinyurl.com/e95a3

Dutch Cabinet to Resign Over Somali's Case


By TOBY STERLING
The Associated Press
Thursday, June 29, 2006; 2:58 PM

AMSTERDAM, Netherlands -- The Dutch prime minister said Thursday his government will resign after his coalition split over the citizenship case of a Somali-born lawmaker. Prime Minister Jan Peter Balkenende said he will tender his resignation to Queen Beatrix on Friday, signaling the collapse of three-year-old government and likely early elections.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on June 29, 2006, 03:41:43 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
I just took a look at that “other” message board and some of those people actually think Beth Twitty spends her leisure time reading their posts.  Kind of reminds me of that public service announcement with the egg in a frying pan.  Whduhhellaredeezcrackheadson…


I think we should forget about the "other" message boards (well, at least the "dirty" ones) from this point forward.  We represent the best of the best here.  They are simply jealous of that.  Ever notice that those sites are filled with our "banished ones"?  It rarely happens in reverse of that.  That says someting about the quality of content here.  We should ALL be proud of that fact...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Peaches on June 29, 2006, 03:43:02 PM
Thanks, Sharon.  What letter of the alphabet do I have to go to in order to read the forum part?  

TY


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Easywriter on June 29, 2006, 03:45:00 PM
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
I just took a look at that “other” message board and some of those people actually think Beth Twitty spends her leisure time reading their posts.  Kind of reminds me of that public service announcement with the egg in a frying pan.  Whduhhellaredeezcrackheadson…


I think we should forget about the "other" message boards (well, at least the "dirty" ones) from this point forward.  We represent the best of the best here.  They are simply jealous of that.  Ever notice that those sites are filled with our "banished ones"?  It rarely happens in reverse of that.  That says someting about the quality of content here.  We should ALL be proud of that fact...


Sometimes it is so off the wall that it is amusing and at other times it makes a person question the sanity of some of those people.  I wonder if their friends and co-workers realize what really lurks in the minds and hearts of the evil ones?  Wasn't that an old radio show? lol


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Peaches on June 29, 2006, 03:45:19 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
I just took a look at that “other” message board and some of those people actually think Beth Twitty spends her leisure time reading their posts.  Kind of reminds me of that public service announcement with the egg in a frying pan.  Whduhhellaredeezcrackheadson…


"I don't know if this commercial has kept anyone away from drugs but it sure has put me off on eggs"              Funky Winderbean


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Nut44x4 on June 29, 2006, 03:47:00 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
I ate too much lunch and now I just want to hide under my desk until quiting time!

Sure Happy It's Thursday!


I see letters....is it an S...I see, I see....an H.....anyone have an H in their name....., I see an I !!  .......... ;) oh, I get iT.....teehee.....and on a more serious note, I personally think this NY Judge is simply doling out MORE cruel and unusual punishment for a family who has endured way more than their share!! GET ON WITH IT! I am sure many feel there are more important matters on the doc 4 this judge, but come on.....it has been way too long....I am gonna pull a Nancy Grace on this and say this Judge should be held in CONTEMPT!!!!!! ACKKKKKKK!!!!!!!!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on June 29, 2006, 03:52:57 PM
Quote from: "terryd270"
Hi Jacqueline!  I know I'm going to mess up soon and start sending out code to you guys and then you will know I'm crazy..


LOL!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Jerry from Ohio on June 29, 2006, 03:55:31 PM
Quote from: "terryd270"
Hi Jacqueline!  I know I'm going to mess up soon and start sending out code to you guys and then you will know I'm crazy..


  Sorry  Terry  too late we have already had a meeting about that sorry  didn't you get that memo ?
 Damm could have sworn I sent that to ya  HeHeHe  
 ::::::::::Giggeling here like crazy :::::::::
 can just imagine Terry  thinking who is this crazy Cowboy  and who does he think he is messen with ROFL  Now !!
  REACHING for a fresh depends !  Things are definatly out of control here today  LOL
  Darn,  Ol Jer  Looks into box and sees it is empty  no depends left  OH chit !  Uh OH  no ment No Pee, No Pee !!           :shock:

  your new friend Jerry from Ohio
  ( Who some say  was thrown on his head by the Bulls one too many times )


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Anna on June 29, 2006, 03:58:43 PM
Quote from: "AZLady"
Is everyone leaving now?  I wanted to talk about something that's been bothering me for a week, ever since I heard Jossy on the internet radio show.  Jossy said that the ALE KNOW Natalee was at Joran's apartment.  They KNOW this.  I wonder how they know it.  What evidence do they have?  Has anyone heard?



I haven't heard anything but think it might go back to the phone records.   :roll: And of course we do not have access to those.  Wonder if ALE even bothered to obtain and secure them or waited until they are gone like everything else.  

After Joran's 22nd version of events, eliminating the lighthouse, is this the only place the three still agree that they went that night?  There and the beach?

But you are right to wonder.  Do you suppose there was some forensic evidence found on something, even the gate outside so he had to say there were there or stopped briefly and is that why they claim one of the younger brothers was home?  What a burden and wrong to do to that other child if in fact this has been claimed!  That should be a crime against a child right there.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: sharon on June 29, 2006, 04:06:05 PM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Thanks, Sharon.  What letter of the alphabet do I have to go to in order to read the forum part?  

TY


Sorry Peaches :oops:  :oops:

I too am trying to do a few things at the same time (not well, though).

Try this:

http://www.nycbar.org/pdf/report/ForeignArbitral.pdf

It should bring up the pdf.

Otherwise -- you need to type 'forum non conveniens' in that search box and it will return a link to the pdf.

Again -- sorry :oops:  I HATE when that happens.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: AZLady on June 29, 2006, 04:06:49 PM
Easy, we have sharp and capable minds here that can sift the spin from the truth.  We turn it over, and punch at it, and knead it some more, and the truth rises to the surface.  However, if we don't have the "dough" to start with, then how can we make bread?   :lol:   Please don't stop sharing your information--it is valuable.

I am still wondering about the evidence found in Joran's apartment that Natalee was there.  I believe Jossy when he says the police KNOW she was there.  He said that so emphatically that I feel there is evidence of her presence there.  Would her DNA be on his sheets, on his door or walls?  Did they find her sandals or some article of clothing there?  I suppose we should be glad that the prosecution is tight-lipped about evidence that will be used in a trial, but my curiosity is pushing the limits of my little brain!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Peaches on June 29, 2006, 04:06:50 PM
Thanks, Sharon.  I guess and got it right.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: thik on June 29, 2006, 04:07:04 PM
I remember in the beginning when Beth first made contact with 'Dinkus',aka (Joran)..   he pounded his chest and and yelled at her '' what do you want me to do?""   he should have completed the comment right then and there. This would be all over with.. ''what do you wantr me to do,, she's already dead'' !!!   (sorry)   I've felt this for a long long time..


God Bless Natalee, Wherever She Is.........................


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: msmarple on June 29, 2006, 04:07:16 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Sometimes it is so off the wall that it is amusing and at other times it makes a person question the sanity of some of those people.  I wonder if their friends and co-workers realize what really lurks in the minds and hearts of the evil ones?  Wasn't that an old radio show? lol


Who knows what evil lurks in the hearts of men? The Shadow knows ...

Of course I don't personally remember this.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: terryd270 on June 29, 2006, 04:08:28 PM
Jerry from Ohio,

It happen already, I kept sending some stuff to Klaasend to send to someone else and it wasn't what I thought I was sending.. She told me what I sent her and I couldn't believe it..  I know everyone that uses IM has done that, when trying to talk to multiple people at the same time..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Peaches on June 29, 2006, 04:10:27 PM
Quote from: "thik"
I remember in the beginning when Beth first made contact with 'Dinkus',aka (Joran)..   he pounded his chest and and yelled at her '' what do you want me to do?""   he should have completed the comment right then and there. This would be all over with.. ''what do you wantr me to do,, she's already dead'' !!!   (sorry)   I've felt this for a long long time..


God Bless Natalee, Wherever She Is.........................


I agree.  "What do you want to me to do?" seems like an incomplete thought by someone who knows the answer to the question.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on June 29, 2006, 04:13:15 PM
Quote from: "terryd270"
Jerry from Ohio,

It happen already, I kept sending some stuff to Klaasend to send to someone else and it wasn't what I thought I was sending.. She told me what I sent her and I couldn't believe it..  I know everyone that uses IM has done that, when trying to talk to multiple people at the same time..


Where was this posted?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: friend of monkeys on June 29, 2006, 04:13:35 PM
Quote from: Anna
Quote from: "AZLady"
Is everyone leaving now?  I wanted to talk about something that's been bothering me for a week, ever since I heard Jossy on the internet radio show.  Jossy said that the ALE KNOW Natalee was at Joran's apartment.  They KNOW this.  I wonder how they know it.  What evidence do they have?  Has anyone heard?



news to me....hey all...nice front page

aruba truth archives

a thought while i was away ...ever hear someone say
"one hand washes the other"....lets assume both hands are dirty....what do u get?

dirtyhands

my thought...shango was referring to two people as "dirtyhands"....
anyone??? love to make a few more of my brain cells explode
tia


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: AZLady on June 29, 2006, 04:14:18 PM
Sharon, the NYC Bar article has nothing to do with this case or the civil case that JQK filed.  This article is about the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards.  The only thing in common with this case is the term forum non conveniens.  It does not deal with similar issues.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: friend of monkeys on June 29, 2006, 04:15:40 PM
Quote from: "thik"
I remember in the beginning when Beth first made contact with 'Dinkus',aka (Joran)..   he pounded his chest and and yelled at her '' what do you want me to do?""   he should have completed the comment right then and there. This would be all over with.. ''what do you wantr me to do,, she's already dead'' !!!   (sorry)   I've felt this for a long long time..


God Bless Natalee, Wherever She Is.........................



or.........."they already took her"....would make sense too


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: AZLady on June 29, 2006, 04:15:54 PM
Quote from: friend of monkeys
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "AZLady"
Is everyone leaving now?  I wanted to talk about something that's been bothering me for a week, ever since I heard Jossy on the internet radio show.  Jossy said that the ALE KNOW Natalee was at Joran's apartment.  They KNOW this.  I wonder how they know it.  What evidence do they have?  Has anyone heard?



news to me....hey all...nice front page

aruba truth archives

a thought while i was away ...ever hear someone say
"one hand washes the other"....lets assume both hands are dirty....what do u get?

dirtyhands

my thought...shango was referring to two people as "dirtyhands"....
anyone??? love to make a few more of my brain cells explode
tia


Agreed.  There are multiple people with "dirtyhands."


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: AZLady on June 29, 2006, 04:16:44 PM
Quote from: "friend of monkeys"
Quote from: "thik"
I remember in the beginning when Beth first made contact with 'Dinkus',aka (Joran)..   he pounded his chest and and yelled at her '' what do you want me to do?""   he should have completed the comment right then and there. This would be all over with.. ''what do you wantr me to do,, she's already dead'' !!!   (sorry)   I've felt this for a long long time..


God Bless Natalee, Wherever She Is.........................



or.........."they already took her"....would make sense too

Or they've already disposed of her body.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on June 29, 2006, 04:19:03 PM
I too always got the impression that after he said WHAT DO YOU WANT ME TO DO.... that something like:  it's too late now would have followed.

And I feel that meant she was gone.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Jerry from Ohio on June 29, 2006, 04:19:57 PM
I agree it was an incomplete sentence  and even the beating on his chest was an inappropiate gesture filled with fear and rage that he was almost caught .
  Such a very sad thing that daddy was allowed and  steped in and stopped him,  if left to his own thought processes   he  would have put his foot in his mouth all the way up to his Knee.  Just an ol Country Boys opinion .
  Jerry from Ohio

**************************************************



Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "thik"
I remember in the beginning when Beth first made contact with 'Dinkus',aka (Joran)..   he pounded his chest and and yelled at her '' what do you want me to do?""   he should have completed the comment right then and there. This would be all over with.. ''what do you wantr me to do,, she's already dead'' !!!   (sorry)   I've felt this for a long long time..


God Bless Natalee, Wherever She Is.........................


I agree.  "What do you want to me to do?" seems like an incomplete thought by someone who knows the answer to the question.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: friend of monkeys on June 29, 2006, 04:21:11 PM
agreeing on all of the above....

not that it solves anything


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Shizaru on June 29, 2006, 04:21:52 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "AZLady"
Is everyone leaving now?  I wanted to talk about something that's been bothering me for a week, ever since I heard Jossy on the internet radio show.  Jossy said that the ALE KNOW Natalee was at Joran's apartment.  They KNOW this.  I wonder how they know it.  What evidence do they have?  Has anyone heard?



I haven't heard anything but think it might go back to the phone records.   :roll: And of course we do not have access to those.  Wonder if ALE even bothered to obtain and secure them or waited until they are gone like everything else.  

After Joran's 22nd version of events, eliminating the lighthouse, is this the only place the three still agree that they went that night?  There and the beach?

But you are right to wonder.  Do you suppose there was some forensic evidence found on something, even the gate outside so he had to say there were there or stopped briefly and is that why they claim one of the younger brothers was home?  What a burden and wrong to do to that other child if in fact this has been claimed!  That should be a crime against a child right there.


No, the three don't agreee that they went to his apt that nite.  2K say they took a completely differnet route, down the main road past La Cabana to the lighthouse.

Also, I don't believe it's true that ALE "knows" she was in his apt.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: thik on June 29, 2006, 04:23:49 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
I too always got the impression that after he said WHAT DO YOU WANT ME TO DO.... that something like:  it's too late now would have followed.

And I feel that meant she was gone.



exactly !!!  the options are endless aren't they ?

 My wish is that dinkus' be cursed to re-live the events with Natalee, and eventually 'feel' something remorseful.....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: AZLady on June 29, 2006, 04:24:01 PM
Quote from: "Shizaru"


No, the three don't agreee that they went to his apt that nite.  2K say they took a completely differnet route, down the main road past La Cabana to the lighthouse.

Also, I don't believe it's true that ALE "knows" she was in his apt.


Why?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: ala_gunslinger on June 29, 2006, 04:25:41 PM
I don't think the ale could find their own arse with a map and a compass.

Hey ya'll.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Shizaru on June 29, 2006, 04:26:22 PM
Quote from: "AZLady"
Quote from: "Shizaru"


No, the three don't agreee that they went to his apt that nite.  2K say they took a completely differnet route, down the main road past La Cabana to the lighthouse.

Also, I don't believe it's true that ALE "knows" she was in his apt.


Why?


Because then Joran would be in jail now.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: AZLady on June 29, 2006, 04:28:06 PM
Quote from: "Shizaru"
Quote from: "AZLady"
Quote from: "Shizaru"


No, the three don't agreee that they went to his apt that nite.  2K say they took a completely differnet route, down the main road past La Cabana to the lighthouse.

Also, I don't believe it's true that ALE "knows" she was in his apt.


Why?


Because then Joran would be in jail now.


That was the source of Jossy's frustration and anger.  He said that the ALE KNOW she was in Joran's apartment that night, and he could not understand why they didn't arrest him.

Shizaru, did you listen to the webcast where Dana Pretzer interviewed Jossy?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: sharon on June 29, 2006, 04:30:04 PM
Quote from: "AZLady"
Sharon, the NYC Bar article has nothing to do with this case or the civil case that JQK filed.  This article is about the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards.  The only thing in common with this case is the term forum non conveniens.  It does not deal with similar issues.


AZLady -- you are correct. This opinion was not expressed as a result or as a request of JQK's filing and it is not related to the case.

This is a special committee of the NYC bar as far as I can tell -- and their role is to express opinions.

It is an opinion expressed on 'forum non conveniens' -- and when it does and does not apply.

Since it is a pdf, I can't seem to cut and paste the actual 'conclusion'.

I am not a lawyer (nor do I play one on TV) and I was told, by a legal type, that this would give the NYSC judge an 'opinion' to use or site in her decision.

Since I am not a lawyer, I was asking the legal minds on this board for their input -- I had originally posted this on the previous thread. Sorry for any confusion.

AZlady, if you are a legal mind -- I'm very interested in your input as to their conclusion.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: AZLady on June 29, 2006, 04:30:50 PM
I do believe Jossy when he makes emphatic public statements that cannot be misinterpreted.  He said, twice, on the air, that the police KNOW she was in Joran's apartment that night.  Thus, my follow-up question is how do they know this, what is their evidence, and, inevitably, why isn't Joran under arrest?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Shizaru on June 29, 2006, 04:32:39 PM
Quote from: "AZLady"
Quote from: "Shizaru"
Quote from: "AZLady"
Quote from: "Shizaru"


No, the three don't agreee that they went to his apt that nite.  2K say they took a completely differnet route, down the main road past La Cabana to the lighthouse.

Also, I don't believe it's true that ALE "knows" she was in his apt.


Why?


Because then Joran would be in jail now.


That was the source of Jossy's frustration and anger.  He said that the ALE KNOW she was in Joran's apartment that night, and he could not understand why they didn't arrest him.

Shizaru, did you listen to the webcast where Dana Pretzer interviewed Jossy?


No, but altho I think Jossy's heart is in the right place, he's not infallible.  I believe there was an effort to protect Joran initially, but that right now if ALE could nail Joran they would.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: KatzHome on June 29, 2006, 04:34:03 PM
Quote
terryd270 wrote:

I was hoping to find TaylorGal on this morning because I had promise to give her a site of a friend that I go fishing with and that created a beautiful yard that I told her about.. Well he will be adding those pictures soon but did just get back from Celtic Fling and Highland Games in
Mount Hope, PA last weekend and those are kinda of neat pictures.. He also has some pictures of the fair that we went this year that I mention. He really takes beautiful nature shots so enjoy..

http://www.decastri.com/


I don't have time right now to look through his whole site ~ but his photo  on the home page is beautiful!!!

And I see that the site was made on a Mac.  It totally figures...


I need a new car ~ and I want a new Mac ~ Oh!  I can't wait till I save enough money to buy both!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: AZLady on June 29, 2006, 04:36:52 PM
Shizaru, this has nothing to do with Jossy's heart.  Jossy is not a liar; he tells the truth that he knows.  While others on Aruba have dissembled and fabricated and prevaricated, Jossy has always been proven to tell the truth as he knows it.  

He made a very clear statement that the police KNOW Natalee was at Joran's apartment that night.  He did not offer his opinion; he did not speculate.  He said, unequivocally, the police KNOW Natalee was at Joran's apartment that night.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: AZLady on June 29, 2006, 04:39:12 PM
Please go to the archives and listen to Jossy discuss the case.  You will hear what I heard. http://sundaynightsatellite.libsyn.com/


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Shizaru on June 29, 2006, 04:41:37 PM
Quote from: "AZLady"
Shizaru, this has nothing to do with Jossy's heart.  Jossy is not a liar; he tells the truth that he knows.  While others on Aruba have dissembled and fabricated and prevaricated, Jossy has always been proven to tell the truth as he knows it.  

He made a very clear statement that the police KNOW Natalee was at Joran's apartment that night.  He did not offer his opinion; he did not speculate.  He said, unequivocally, the police KNOW Natalee was at Joran's apartment that night.


I'm not saying he's a liar, I'm saying he may have wrong information. And I think he does, for the reason I stated.  And also because if proof existed that she was in his apt, that would be such a huge bombshell that some word of it would have leaked a long time ago.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: KatzHome on June 29, 2006, 04:41:40 PM
Klaas ~ if you think that this shouldn't be posted too many times ~ that it should be kept close to the vest ~ please delete this post.  Thanks!

I have to run out ~ but I'll be back in about an hour...

I brought all of Sharon's posts from the last thread on the NYC judge, the ruling, the Hague and NATO escorting Joran over from the last thread.  Thanks for getting my hopes up, Sharon!


sharon wrote:

Morning Monkeys!

I've been out of town a bit lately and away from Internet access -- so I have LOTS of reading to catch up on. It will take awhile.

I know we have 'legal' minds here -- so this is a question to them.

On Michelle's site there has been an 'anonymous' poster that has commented many times on the Hague convention and that if we hear NOTHING that JQK has the right to start questioning jvds and pvds at the 60 day mark. I will post a few of the comments below -- but I have NO IDEA if there is any truth to the comments. Or if they are even the same poster.

Anyone??

"Anonymous said...
Looks like the Judge is playing the Hague Convention 60 days waiting period game by her legal advisement panel. On July 17, JQK has the right to call Joran and Paulus for deposition in NYC courtroom. We will see what happen. This Natalee Case is highly charged and political. If the Bush Administration do not side with Natalee, there will be a very serious consequence for the Mid Term election in NYC for the Republicans.
Thu Jun 15, 01:02:52 AM EDT "

"Anonymous said...
Looks like the NYSC Judge advisement panel acts on the Hague Convention War Crime 60 days rules protocols without have the initiation Judge to make a ruling on the civil case. That means on July 15, 60 days after the May 15 hearing, the plaintiff can call the Defendant Joran and his lawyer Joe T. to the stand for deposition. Joran will be escorted by the NATO Marine Military Police, and flying in from Holland to New York City. Joran is now under citizen surveilance and prevented from escaping to another country.
Thu Jun 01, 11:10:49 AM EDT "

"Anonymous said...
The New York City Supreme Court has the direct Hague Convention power granted from the United Nations solely for the New York City Supreme Court to subpoena Joran from Holland to appear in
court in the Month of July, 2006 after Joran completed his current school session. Joran domiciles in Holland and refuses to appear before the Judge at New York City Supreme Court under the adivisement of his attorney Joe Tarcopina. Joran lost his domcile protection after violating the Aruban Judge's restriction travel order by a Dutch court. The NYCSC judge can compel the testimony of
Joran who is unwilling to appear by the force of the NATO military police on the wartime signatory treaties formalised between Holland and the United States ratified in 1965 by Hague Civil Precedure Convention.
Sat May 20, 06:12:51 AM EDT"

"Anonymous said...
The New York City Supreme Court has the direct Hague Convention power granted from the United Nations solely for the New York City Supreme Court to subpoena Joran from Holland to appear in
court in the Month of July, 2006 after Joran completed his current school session. Joran domiciles in Holland and refuses to appear before the Judge at New York City Supreme Court under the adivisement of his attorney Joe Tarcopina. Joran lost his domcile protection after violating the Aruban Judge's restriction travel order by a Dutch court. The NYCSC judge can compel the testimony of
Joran who is unwilling to appear by the force of the NATO military police on the wartime signatory treaties formalised between Holland and the United States ratified in 1965 by Hague Civil Precedure Convention.
Sat May 20, 06:12:51 AM EDT "



This was another VERY interesting post about the subject from a comment at Michelle's site.

This arm of the NY bar that has been formed to express opinions ..... basically says that Taco Joe is out of luck if he thinks that 'forum non conveniens' applies.

Anonymous said...
The New York City Bar Association don't support the Forum Non Conveniens. Here is the link,

http://www.abcny.org/Publications/reports/index.php?type=subject
Tue May 16, 08:10:39 AM EDT


Anonymous said...
It is very clear stated in Hague Convention that the New York City Supreme Court has the absolute subpoena power over all the civil cases related to all FNC over the world because New York City is the landlord of the United Nations' residence based on the Roman Stature. New York City is the only unique place in the world has that power, not even the White House in DC has that power. Please study the Hague Convention by-rules very carefully. United Nations is a Forum Non Conveniens to the Greater City of New York, so the Charter of United Nations pays tribute of civil jurisdiction to the Landlord who is the New York State Supreme Court. It is written in stone upon the Charter of United Nations.
Thu May 18, 10:59:51 PM EDT

Anonymous said...
It is a long haul. However, the Hague Convention allows the plaintiff to call witness while the advisement is in due process. The discoveries can be done in 3 to 4 weeks. But the monetary award by the Judge might take years for the decision depending the date of submital of the affidavit by the advisement panel.
Thu May 18, 02:42:14 AM EDT


"Anonymous said...
Rule 23. 60-Day Rule. If 60 days have elapsed after a motion has been finally submitted or oral argument held, whichever was later, and no decision has been issued by the court, counsel for the movant shall send the court a letter alerting it to this fact with copies to all parties to the motion. While the advisement is in motion and past 60 days without returning an affidavit to the Judge, the Judge will not discourage the plaintiff from calling the defendants to the stand, if the defense have no shows, the defendants will have lost the civil case under the provisions of the Hague Convension. A default judgement follows.
Thu May 18, 05:37:19 PM EDT


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: AZLady on June 29, 2006, 04:43:28 PM
Quote from: "sharon"
Quote from: "AZLady"
Sharon, the NYC Bar article has nothing to do with this case or the civil case that JQK filed.  This article is about the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards.  The only thing in common with this case is the term forum non conveniens.  It does not deal with similar issues.


AZLady -- you are correct. This opinion was not expressed as a result or as a request of JQK's filing and it is not related to the case.

This is a special committee of the NYC bar as far as I can tell -- and their role is to express opinions.

It is an opinion expressed on 'forum non conveniens' -- and when it does and does not apply.

Since it is a pdf, I can't seem to cut and paste the actual 'conclusion'.

I am not a lawyer (nor do I play one on TV) and I was told, by a legal type, that this would give the NYSC judge an 'opinion' to use or site in her decision.

Since I am not a lawyer, I was asking the legal minds on this board for their input -- I had originally posted this on the previous thread. Sorry for any confusion.

AZlady, if you are a legal mind -- I'm very interested in your input as to their conclusion.


Sharon, I'm not the legal authority you seek.  My understanding is that if a case is cited as reference in court, it had darn well better pertain to the matter at hand or it has no bearing on the case.  This is true in any source-based writing, not just legal references or sources.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: AZLady on June 29, 2006, 04:50:08 PM
Quote from: "Shizaru"
Quote from: "AZLady"
Shizaru, this has nothing to do with Jossy's heart.  Jossy is not a liar; he tells the truth that he knows.  While others on Aruba have dissembled and fabricated and prevaricated, Jossy has always been proven to tell the truth as he knows it.  

He made a very clear statement that the police KNOW Natalee was at Joran's apartment that night.  He did not offer his opinion; he did not speculate.  He said, unequivocally, the police KNOW Natalee was at Joran's apartment that night.


I'm not saying he's a liar, I'm saying he may have wrong information. And I think he does, for the reason I stated.  And also because if proof existed that she was in his apt, that would be such a huge bombshell that some word of it would have leaked a long time ago.


I do not agree.  Jossy is quite clear when he doubts his source and when he does not.  He is a canny and wise newspaper man who can judge his sources.  He is emphatic that the police KNOW Natalee was at Joran's apartment.   No, this would not be such a huge bombshell.  Beth stated that she felt Natalee had been there at the VDS home in June 2005.  This was her feeling, and she didn't have evidence of that at the time that she shared with us.  

You have little faith in the Prosecution or the ALE keeping evidence quiet and under wraps, don't you?  Well, we didn't learn about GVC and his possible knowledge of Natalee's disappearance until recently, a year after he had been interviewed several times!  I do not think we know all the evidence or information that is in possession of ALE and prosecution.  Yes, I do think this is a huge bombshell and it is time to explode it.  Happy 4th of July!!!    :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: nonesuche on June 29, 2006, 04:50:38 PM
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
I just took a look at that “other” message board and some of those people actually think Beth Twitty spends her leisure time reading their posts.  Kind of reminds me of that public service announcement with the egg in a frying pan.  Whduhhellaredeezcrackheadson…


I think we should forget about the "other" message boards (well, at least the "dirty" ones) from this point forward.  We represent the best of the best here.  They are simply jealous of that.  Ever notice that those sites are filled with our "banished ones"?  It rarely happens in reverse of that.  That says someting about the quality of content here.  We should ALL be proud of that fact...


third-

I agree regarding messages to the family as Easy said, is pretty ludicrous. I do however feel it's important to remember that not every pro-family site has no value beyond SM. If that were the case then Klaas wouldn't work so hard to pull posts or articles which appear there.

I also don't mind saying out loud that I wish to heaven we had grannytoad posting here, she has a mind like a steel trap and has contributed much. I know carnut would agree  :wink:

but I never wish away all trends of community thought or interaction, much like the approach to marketing a new product - you don't wish away all the competition for it validates your own existence to have competition?

Just IMO and not a negative toward you, but hopefully thought-provoking?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: AZLady on June 29, 2006, 04:52:02 PM
Sorry, I meant to say I do not think this is a huge bombshell but it's time to explode it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: AZLady on June 29, 2006, 04:54:18 PM
Hi None.  What's up?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: sharon on June 29, 2006, 04:54:38 PM
Quote from: "KatzHome"
Klaas ~ if you think that this shouldn't be posted too many times ~ that it should be kept close to the vest ~ please delete this post.  Thanks!

I have to run out ~ but I'll be back in about an hour...

I brought all of Sharon's posts from the last thread on the NYC judge, the ruling, the Hague and NATO escorting Joran over from the last thread.  Thanks for getting my hopes up, Sharon!



You're such a sweetie KatzHome :)

I don't want to get your hopes up  -- or mine or anyone's -- for nothing.

That's why I posted and asked for help from the 'legal' minds.

We were told early on when the civil suit was filed that there was very little 'precedence' for the decision on this jurisdiction.

I was interested to see what the NYSC judge might be 'researching' for her decision.

As with so much the past 13 months -- this might be more BS.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: thik on June 29, 2006, 04:54:57 PM
Well let's see, the 4th is a coming,

aren't we STILL waiting for those damn ''Fireworks'' ??? :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: AZLady on June 29, 2006, 04:56:38 PM
Quote from: "sharon"
Quote from: "KatzHome"
Klaas ~ if you think that this shouldn't be posted too many times ~ that it should be kept close to the vest ~ please delete this post.  Thanks!

I have to run out ~ but I'll be back in about an hour...

I brought all of Sharon's posts from the last thread on the NYC judge, the ruling, the Hague and NATO escorting Joran over from the last thread.  Thanks for getting my hopes up, Sharon!



You're such a sweetie KatzHome :)

I don't want to get your hopes up  -- or mine or anyone's -- for nothing.

That's why I posted and asked for help from the 'legal' minds.

We were told early on when the civil suit was filed that there was very little 'precedence' for the decision on this jurisdiction.

I was interested to see what the NYSC judge might be 'researching' for her decision.

As with so much the past 13 months -- this might be more BS.


While there has been little precedence for this decision, I think the judge is most likely researching the Constitutional rights of the family and how the Consitution upholds those rights as opposed to the rights of the state to declare jurisdiction.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: friend of monkeys on June 29, 2006, 04:57:27 PM
Quote from: "AZLady"
I do believe Jossy when he makes emphatic public statements that cannot be misinterpreted.  He said, twice, on the air, that the police KNOW she was in Joran's apartment that night.  Thus, my follow-up question is how do they know this, what is their evidence, and, inevitably, why isn't Joran under arrest?



because daddy paid for him not to be???


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: nonesuche on June 29, 2006, 04:57:52 PM
Quote from: "AZLady"
Hi None.  What's up?


Hi AZ-

Just typing while my patient is napping  :wink:

I have had some email discussion with Sharon around her research and points though, and Chadbourne which is Scott Balber's firm has some really interesting partner profiles which introduce some expertise within the Supreme Courts, international and transnational crime and law, and also international partners with that expertise.

So I have to put in a vote from my uneducated non-lawyer opinion that I think it may be more complex than simply the forum of nonconveniens but hopefully we'll see over time.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Easywriter on June 29, 2006, 04:58:48 PM
Quote from: "Shizaru"
Quote from: "AZLady"
Shizaru, this has nothing to do with Jossy's heart.  Jossy is not a liar; he tells the truth that he knows.  While others on Aruba have dissembled and fabricated and prevaricated, Jossy has always been proven to tell the truth as he knows it.  

He made a very clear statement that the police KNOW Natalee was at Joran's apartment that night.  He did not offer his opinion; he did not speculate.  He said, unequivocally, the police KNOW Natalee was at Joran's apartment that night.


I'm not saying he's a liar, I'm saying he may have wrong information. And I think he does, for the reason I stated.  And also because if proof existed that she was in his apt, that would be such a huge bombshell that some word of it would have leaked a long time ago.


When was the first admission that they even went by Joran’s house that night?  There was much speculation about such, but I believe the confirmation came from Joran’s lips during one of his interviews.  That disclosure did not cause ALE to bring him back in for questioning, did it?

My thoughts are that there are things in the declarations that led people to believe they were at Joran’s apartment.  His whole Greta interview miraculously adjusted in a manner to address every rumor we had heard and read of his statements.  There is a question about shoe size, so Joran makes a point of talking about his shoes.  There is a leak about them going by Joran’s apartment, so he brings it up in the interview in an effort to minimize the importance.  There was just one thing after another that was carefully adjusted during that interview in order to account for some contradiction that Joran left dangling in his declarations.

That interview would have been a masterpiece of deception, if anyone did not know the history of this case.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Shizaru on June 29, 2006, 04:59:03 PM
Quote from: "AZLady"
Quote from: "Shizaru"
Quote from: "AZLady"
Shizaru, this has nothing to do with Jossy's heart.  Jossy is not a liar; he tells the truth that he knows.  While others on Aruba have dissembled and fabricated and prevaricated, Jossy has always been proven to tell the truth as he knows it.  

He made a very clear statement that the police KNOW Natalee was at Joran's apartment that night.  He did not offer his opinion; he did not speculate.  He said, unequivocally, the police KNOW Natalee was at Joran's apartment that night.


I'm not saying he's a liar, I'm saying he may have wrong information. And I think he does, for the reason I stated.  And also because if proof existed that she was in his apt, that would be such a huge bombshell that some word of it would have leaked a long time ago.


I do not agree.  Jossy is quite clear when he doubts his source and when he does not.  He is a canny and wise newspaper man who can judge his sources.  He is emphatic that the police KNOW Natalee was at Joran's apartment.   No, this would not be such a huge bombshell.  Beth stated that she felt Natalee had been there at the VDS home in June 2005.  This was her feeling, and she didn't have evidence of that at the time that she shared with us.  

You have little faith in the Prosecution or the ALE keeping evidence quiet and under wraps, don't you?  Well, we didn't learn about GVC and his possible knowledge of Natalee's disappearance until recently, a year after he had been interviewed several times!  I do not think we know all the evidence or information that is in possession of ALE and prosecution.  Yes, I do think this is a huge bombshell and it is time to explode it.  Happy 4th of July!!!    :D


It wouldn't be a bombshell that she was there, but the fact that they could prove it would be.  

I have very little faith on the Prosecution or ALE period.  

I don't think GVC had any knowledge of Natalee's disappearance, I think ALE just arrested him because altho now they would nail Joran if they could, as long as they can't they will try to find alternate suspects to muddy the water.  

Happy 4th to you too.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on June 29, 2006, 05:02:21 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
I just took a look at that “other” message board and some of those people actually think Beth Twitty spends her leisure time reading their posts.  Kind of reminds me of that public service announcement with the egg in a frying pan.  Whduhhellaredeezcrackheadson…


I think we should forget about the "other" message boards (well, at least the "dirty" ones) from this point forward.  We represent the best of the best here.  They are simply jealous of that.  Ever notice that those sites are filled with our "banished ones"?  It rarely happens in reverse of that.  That says someting about the quality of content here.  We should ALL be proud of that fact...


Sometimes it is so off the wall that it is amusing and at other times it makes a person question the sanity of some of those people.  I wonder if their friends and co-workers realize what really lurks in the minds and hearts of the evil ones?  Wasn't that an old radio show? lol


You are entering the squeaking door of Intersanctum.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: nonesuche on June 29, 2006, 05:05:57 PM
Easy-

Come on and admit it, we've met even psychopaths at work in corporate america  :lol: I know I have.

That's when I'd like to yell "hey put baby in the corner"  :lol: "and quickly"

hope you're feeling better today tyler, good to see you!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on June 29, 2006, 05:10:56 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
I just took a look at that “other” message board and some of those people actually think Beth Twitty spends her leisure time reading their posts.  Kind of reminds me of that public service announcement with the egg in a frying pan.  Whduhhellaredeezcrackheadson…


I think we should forget about the "other" message boards (well, at least the "dirty" ones) from this point forward.  We represent the best of the best here.  They are simply jealous of that.  Ever notice that those sites are filled with our "banished ones"?  It rarely happens in reverse of that.  That says someting about the quality of content here.  We should ALL be proud of that fact...


third-

I agree regarding messages to the family as Easy said, is pretty ludicrous. I do however feel it's important to remember that not every pro-family site has no value beyond SM. If that were the case then Klaas wouldn't work so hard to pull posts or articles which appear there.

I also don't mind saying out loud that I wish to heaven we had grannytoad posting here, she has a mind like a steel trap and has contributed much. I know carnut would agree  :wink:

but I never wish away all trends of community thought or interaction, much like the approach to marketing a new product - you don't wish away all the competition for it validates your own existence to have competition?

Just IMO and not a negative toward you, but hopefully thought-provoking?


Nor do I take it anything other then thought provoking.  I know you to have always been respectful, so I would never believe this to be anythign other then that.  So, allow me to retort (as the greatr Samuel L. Jackson once said)...

I don't doubt that there are many purposeful reasons to have "other" sites actively involved in this case...even if/when they have opposing viewpoints.  It's perfectly natural and healthy to have debate.  But, there's a fine line between respectful debate, and abusive opposition.  And, strictly stating my opinion here, many of those said sites practice negativity in their presentations of their "truths".  And, again, speaking for myself, I would not want to be a part of that...now or ever.  Does that make the entire tree bad because of a few apples?  Of course not.  But, I think their reputation precedes them.  And, because of that, those "good" ones will tend to be overlooked...in favor of the many "bad" ones that outnumber them...ya know?

As for the competition factor...of course we need that aspect in order to thrive.  What fun would it be without it?  But, we have to make sure the game is played fairly or else winning isn't as much of a reward as it should be.  When your opponent plays dirty, it disrespects the game.  And, nobody wants to win that way.  I'm just proud of the way SM plays the game...

Thanks for the debate.  It's good to use my brain every once and a while...;)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Shizaru on June 29, 2006, 05:11:02 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Easy-

Come on and admit it, we've met even psychopaths at work in corporate america  :lol: I know I have.

That's when I'd like to yell "hey put baby in the corner"  :lol: "and quickly"

hope you're feeling better today tyler, good to see you!


Nonesuche can you e-mail me


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: tcumom on June 29, 2006, 05:15:10 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
I also don't mind saying out loud that I wish to heaven we had grannytoad posting here, she has a mind like a steel trap and has contributed much. I know carnut would agree  :wink:

Just IMO and not a negative toward you, but hopefully thought-provoking?

Can y'all just invite grannytoad to come over here and visit?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on June 29, 2006, 05:16:35 PM
None, I don't know about that GrannyToad.  We were told by one poster last night the posters at RWV were all din and sin.  Granny Toad, Anna, DH and I were amongst the long-term posters there, so we might all be considered nuts, flakes and toadies.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Peaches on June 29, 2006, 05:16:57 PM
Quote from: "friend of monkeys"
Quote from: "AZLady"
I do believe Jossy when he makes emphatic public statements that cannot be misinterpreted.  He said, twice, on the air, that the police KNOW she was in Joran's apartment that night.  Thus, my follow-up question is how do they know this, what is their evidence, and, inevitably, why isn't Joran under arrest?



because daddy paid for him not to be???


There ya go!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on June 29, 2006, 05:17:35 PM
Quote from: "tcumom"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
I also don't mind saying out loud that I wish to heaven we had grannytoad posting here, she has a mind like a steel trap and has contributed much. I know carnut would agree  :wink:

Just IMO and not a negative toward you, but hopefully thought-provoking?

Can y'all just invite grannytoad to come over here and visit?


Granny Toad has refused many invitations and has repeated more than 1000 times that Natalee is in the sesspool.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: tcumom on June 29, 2006, 05:18:32 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "tcumom"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
I also don't mind saying out loud that I wish to heaven we had grannytoad posting here, she has a mind like a steel trap and has contributed much. I know carnut would agree  :wink:

Just IMO and not a negative toward you, but hopefully thought-provoking?

Can y'all just invite grannytoad to come over here and visit?


Granny Toad has refused many invitations and has repeated more than 1000 times that Natalee is in the sesspool.

oh.  :oops:  :?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on June 29, 2006, 05:18:55 PM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "friend of monkeys"
Quote from: "AZLady"
I do believe Jossy when he makes emphatic public statements that cannot be misinterpreted.  He said, twice, on the air, that the police KNOW she was in Joran's apartment that night.  Thus, my follow-up question is how do they know this, what is their evidence, and, inevitably, why isn't Joran under arrest?



because daddy paid for him not to be???


There ya go!


Well duh!!  I think we ALL know Natalee was in Joran's apartment that night.  Why on earth would a 17 year old kid take a girlk to the beach when he had a place of his own (and all to himself if he wished)?  Makes no sense what so ever...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: nonesuche on June 29, 2006, 05:20:02 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
None, I don't know about that GrannyToad.  We were told by one poster last night the posters at RWV were all din and sin.  Granny Toad, Anna, DH and I were amongst the long-term posters there, so we might all be considered nuts, flakes and toadies.


now you know that means you are in good stead, you're just funnin with me  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on June 29, 2006, 05:22:23 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
None, I don't know about that GrannyToad.  We were told by one poster last night the posters at RWV were all din and sin.  Granny Toad, Anna, DH and I were amongst the long-term posters there, so we might all be considered nuts, flakes and toadies.


now you know that means you are in good stead, you're just funnin with me  :lol:  :lol:


Well, Wreck was right there with us as was Eleye.  We were all working hard and then our blogmeister took the florins from the faded, freckled fauna girl of Aruba, and  :roll:  we were all RTG then.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: nonesuche on June 29, 2006, 05:23:41 PM
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
I just took a look at that “other” message board and some of those people actually think Beth Twitty spends her leisure time reading their posts.  Kind of reminds me of that public service announcement with the egg in a frying pan.  Whduhhellaredeezcrackheadson…


I think we should forget about the "other" message boards (well, at least the "dirty" ones) from this point forward.  We represent the best of the best here.  They are simply jealous of that.  Ever notice that those sites are filled with our "banished ones"?  It rarely happens in reverse of that.  That says someting about the quality of content here.  We should ALL be proud of that fact...


third-

I agree regarding messages to the family as Easy said, is pretty ludicrous. I do however feel it's important to remember that not every pro-family site has no value beyond SM. If that were the case then Klaas wouldn't work so hard to pull posts or articles which appear there.

I also don't mind saying out loud that I wish to heaven we had grannytoad posting here, she has a mind like a steel trap and has contributed much. I know carnut would agree  :wink:

but I never wish away all trends of community thought or interaction, much like the approach to marketing a new product - you don't wish away all the competition for it validates your own existence to have competition?

Just IMO and not a negative toward you, but hopefully thought-provoking?


Nor do I take it anything other then thought provoking.  I know you to have always been respectful, so I would never believe this to be anythign other then that.  So, allow me to retort (as the greatr Samuel L. Jackson once said)...

I don't doubt that there are many purposeful reasons to have "other" sites actively involved in this case...even if/when they have opposing viewpoints.  It's perfectly natural and healthy to have debate.  But, there's a fine line between respectful debate, and abusive opposition.  And, strictly stating my opinion here, many of those said sites practice negativity in their presentations of their "truths".  And, again, speaking for myself, I would not want to be a part of that...now or ever.  Does that make the entire tree bad because of a few apples?  Of course not.  But, I think their reputation precedes them.  And, because of that, those "good" ones will tend to be overlooked...in favor of the many "bad" ones that outnumber them...ya know?

As for the competition factor...of course we need that aspect in order to thrive.  What fun would it be without it?  But, we have to make sure the game is played fairly or else winning isn't as much of a reward as it should be.  When your opponent plays dirty, it disrespects the game.  And, nobody wants to win that way.  I'm just proud of the way SM plays the game...

Thanks for the debate.  It's good to use my brain every once and a while...;)


third, we're on the same page regarding respectful debate, thank you for affording me that  :wink:

my biggest concern is criticisms now against BFN, for actually I think they do a good job and assist the case just as SM has tried to. I'm a bit concerned to hear some think it's no longer that, that's all.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Peaches on June 29, 2006, 05:24:31 PM
You don't go to beach and get sand in your pants when you have a perfectly good clean (I guess that's relative) bed at home.  Doesn't make sense.  Someone as bright and studious as the sporter would surely be able to decide between getting laid at home and getting sand in his naughty neighborhood.  I believe they were at the house.  I bet something small from Natalee's pocket (like her driver's license, underwear or something) ended up under the bed or under a pile of dirty clothes and Anita found it when she got home, heard about the incident and cleaned up the crime scene.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: nonesuche on June 29, 2006, 05:26:14 PM
Peaches has got it, I know I think Anita is the wiser here - where is San???

San like me thinks Anita knows a plenty  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on June 29, 2006, 05:29:23 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"


third, we're on the same page regarding respectful debate, thank you for affording me that  :wink:

my biggest concern is criticisms now against BFN, for actually I think they do a good job and assist the case just as SM has tried to. I'm a bit concerned to hear some think it's no longer that, that's all.


Anytime!  I always enjoy your dialogue...even when you're WRONG!!  ;)

Seriously though...I do think objectivity is VERY important...especially with regards to a case that's as emotionally charged as this one is.  Your concerns are legitimate...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on June 29, 2006, 05:30:22 PM
Well, let me go.  I don't want to be mistaken for a refugee just because I once posted at RWV.  Of course, Anita knows.  I always said she even saw Natalee's panties, the only reason she could have identified them so well but then you know you all jumped on me when I said that out of fear I would insult Bon Dia's handmaidens.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: blah on June 29, 2006, 05:31:22 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Peaches has got it, I know I think Anita is the wiser here - where is San???

San like me thinks Anita knows a plenty  :lol:


make that three of us


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Shizaru on June 29, 2006, 05:32:33 PM
Quote from: "Peaches"
You don't go to beach and get sand in your pants when you have a perfectly good clean (I guess that's relative) bed at home.  Doesn't make sense.  Someone as bright and studious as the sporter would surely be able to decide between getting laid at home and getting sand in his naughty neighborhood.  I believe they were at the house.  I bet something small from Natalee's pocket (like her driver's license, underwear or something) ended up under the bed or under a pile of dirty clothes and Anita found it when she got home, heard about the incident and cleaned up the crime scene.


Not when it's consensual, no.   But there are several reasons why a deserted beach near her hotel would be better suited for a nonconsensual encounter than his apt.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Peaches on June 29, 2006, 05:34:35 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Well, let me go.  I don't want to be mistaken for a refugee just because I once posted at RWV.  Of course, Anita knows.  I always said she even saw Natalee's panties, the only reason she could have identified them so well but then you know you all jumped on me when I said that out of fear I would insult Bon Dia's handmaidens.


I would prefer to be left out of that "you all", if you don't mind.  I tried not to aggravate those from the island who were allegedly trying to be helpful (while busy misdirecting).  When Bondia/Julia/Glenda couldn't find the painted rocks, I knew we were being hosed big  time.  I guess I should've jumped to your defense.  I would never mistake you for a refugee.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: blah on June 29, 2006, 05:35:56 PM
Quote from: "Shizaru"
Quote from: "Peaches"
You don't go to beach and get sand in your pants when you have a perfectly good clean (I guess that's relative) bed at home.  Doesn't make sense.  Someone as bright and studious as the sporter would surely be able to decide between getting laid at home and getting sand in his naughty neighborhood.  I believe they were at the house.  I bet something small from Natalee's pocket (like her driver's license, underwear or something) ended up under the bed or under a pile of dirty clothes and Anita found it when she got home, heard about the incident and cleaned up the crime scene.


Not when it's consensual, no.   But there are several reasons why a deserted beach near her hotel would be better suited for a nonconsensual encounter than his apt.


such as?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Peaches on June 29, 2006, 05:36:08 PM
Quote from: "Shizaru"
Quote from: "Peaches"
You don't go to beach and get sand in your pants when you have a perfectly good clean (I guess that's relative) bed at home.  Doesn't make sense.  Someone as bright and studious as the sporter would surely be able to decide between getting laid at home and getting sand in his naughty neighborhood.  I believe they were at the house.  I bet something small from Natalee's pocket (like her driver's license, underwear or something) ended up under the bed or under a pile of dirty clothes and Anita found it when she got home, heard about the incident and cleaned up the crime scene.


Not when it's consensual, no.   But there are several reasons why a deserted beach near her hotel would be better suited for a nonconsensual encounter than his apt.


But what if there was nobody else home?  And the scene of the crime is a detached building?  And maybe PVDS was either a wi tness or a participant?  

I have a lot of questions for someone with chemo brain.....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Easywriter on June 29, 2006, 05:36:09 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
I just took a look at that “other” message board and some of those people actually think Beth Twitty spends her leisure time reading their posts.  Kind of reminds me of that public service announcement with the egg in a frying pan.  Whduhhellaredeezcrackheadson…


I think we should forget about the "other" message boards (well, at least the "dirty" ones) from this point forward.  We represent the best of the best here.  They are simply jealous of that.  Ever notice that those sites are filled with our "banished ones"?  It rarely happens in reverse of that.  That says someting about the quality of content here.  We should ALL be proud of that fact...


third-

I agree regarding messages to the family as Easy said, is pretty ludicrous. I do however feel it's important to remember that not every pro-family site has no value beyond SM. If that were the case then Klaas wouldn't work so hard to pull posts or articles which appear there.

I also don't mind saying out loud that I wish to heaven we had grannytoad posting here, she has a mind like a steel trap and has contributed much. I know carnut would agree  :wink:

but I never wish away all trends of community thought or interaction, much like the approach to marketing a new product - you don't wish away all the competition for it validates your own existence to have competition?

Just IMO and not a negative toward you, but hopefully thought-provoking?


Nor do I take it anything other then thought provoking.  I know you to have always been respectful, so I would never believe this to be anythign other then that.  So, allow me to retort (as the greatr Samuel L. Jackson once said)...

I don't doubt that there are many purposeful reasons to have "other" sites actively involved in this case...even if/when they have opposing viewpoints.  It's perfectly natural and healthy to have debate.  But, there's a fine line between respectful debate, and abusive opposition.  And, strictly stating my opinion here, many of those said sites practice negativity in their presentations of their "truths".  And, again, speaking for myself, I would not want to be a part of that...now or ever.  Does that make the entire tree bad because of a few apples?  Of course not.  But, I think their reputation precedes them.  And, because of that, those "good" ones will tend to be overlooked...in favor of the many "bad" ones that outnumber them...ya know?

As for the competition factor...of course we need that aspect in order to thrive.  What fun would it be without it?  But, we have to make sure the game is played fairly or else winning isn't as much of a reward as it should be.  When your opponent plays dirty, it disrespects the game.  And, nobody wants to win that way.  I'm just proud of the way SM plays the game...

Thanks for the debate.  It's good to use my brain every once and a while...;)


third, we're on the same page regarding respectful debate, thank you for affording me that  :wink:

my biggest concern is criticisms now against BFN, for actually I think they do a good job and assist the case just as SM has tried to. I'm a bit concerned to hear some think it's no longer that, that's all.


I think BFN is a good site.  For the most part they discuss the case much as we do with very few disruptive types always there stirring the pot.

The site I was talking about goes beyond anything that could be considered normal behavior.  Earlier their favorite topic was about Natalee running away because she was getting forced to get a nose job.  Another topic had to do with her taste in prom outfits.  Then the thread that prompted my post was a challenge to Beth to publicly answer some of their ridiculous questions since they knew she spent a lot of time reading their board.  I think they even decide what pseudonym she was using while reading all their insightful posts.

Now that chit just ain’t normal I tell ya!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Peaches on June 29, 2006, 05:37:06 PM
Good analysis there, Easy.  ABnormal.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Ono on June 29, 2006, 05:37:24 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
I just took a look at that “other” message board and some of those people actually think Beth Twitty spends her leisure time reading their posts.  Kind of reminds me of that public service announcement with the egg in a frying pan.  Whduhhellaredeezcrackheadson…


I think we should forget about the "other" message boards (well, at least the "dirty" ones) from this point forward.  We represent the best of the best here.  They are simply jealous of that.  Ever notice that those sites are filled with our "banished ones"?  It rarely happens in reverse of that.  That says someting about the quality of content here.  We should ALL be proud of that fact...


Sometimes it is so off the wall that it is amusing and at other times it makes a person question the sanity of some of those people.  I wonder if their friends and co-workers realize what really lurks in the minds and hearts of the evil ones?  Wasn't that an old radio show? lol


LOL! "Only the Shadow knows...." 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Easywriter on June 29, 2006, 05:42:39 PM
Quote from: "Shizaru"
Quote from: "Peaches"
You don't go to beach and get sand in your pants when you have a perfectly good clean (I guess that's relative) bed at home.  Doesn't make sense.  Someone as bright and studious as the sporter would surely be able to decide between getting laid at home and getting sand in his naughty neighborhood.  I believe they were at the house.  I bet something small from Natalee's pocket (like her driver's license, underwear or something) ended up under the bed or under a pile of dirty clothes and Anita found it when she got home, heard about the incident and cleaned up the crime scene.


Not when it's consensual, no.   But there are several reasons why a deserted beach near her hotel would be better suited for a nonconsensual encounter than his apt.


These punks had this down to a science and I don't believe that formula included a public beach.  They swoop in 30 minutes before a bar closes and talk a tourist that is there on her last night of holiday to leave with them.  They had a place to go and it was not rolling around in the sand.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on June 29, 2006, 05:43:24 PM
Since I have already entered Intersanctum, I just want to say, that I can see it from Shiz's viewpoint and from that of going to Joran's house.  Personally I do not think that what happened, happened at the house but see I am not as smart as the rest of you.  I am just thinking that a girl on vacation who thinks this stooge is an exchange student from Holland is not going to go to his house.  She wants to have romance somewhere near a beach, if it is consensual, not where the VDS live.  Maybe it is not substandard by their standards, but if Natalee saw that house thinking they were a family of large means, she might have had a heart attack just thinking what a mess she had gotten her house into, believing they lived in a "big house."


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Peaches on June 29, 2006, 05:46:13 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Since I have already entered Intersanctum, I just want to say, that I can see it from Shiz's viewpoint and from that of going to Joran's house.  Personally I do not think that what happened, happened at the house but see I am not as smart as the rest of you.  I am just thinking that a girl on vacation who thinks this stooge is an exchange student from Holland is not going to go to his house.  She wants to have romance somewhere near a beach, if it is consensual, not where the VDS live.  Maybe it is not substandard by their standards, but if Natalee saw that house thinking they were a family of large means, she might have had a heart attack just thinking what a mess she had gotten her house into, believing they lived in a "big house."


Those are good points, TG.  I forgot about the exchange student scam he was running.  I can't see the boys pulling this off 20 times if they made a habit of heading for the beach.  Maybe.  I don't know.  It's so hard to keep the lies straight.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on June 29, 2006, 05:46:13 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "Shizaru"
Quote from: "Peaches"
You don't go to beach and get sand in your pants when you have a perfectly good clean (I guess that's relative) bed at home.  Doesn't make sense.  Someone as bright and studious as the sporter would surely be able to decide between getting laid at home and getting sand in his naughty neighborhood.  I believe they were at the house.  I bet something small from Natalee's pocket (like her driver's license, underwear or something) ended up under the bed or under a pile of dirty clothes and Anita found it when she got home, heard about the incident and cleaned up the crime scene.


Not when it's consensual, no.   But there are several reasons why a deserted beach near her hotel would be better suited for a nonconsensual encounter than his apt.


These punks had this down to a science and I don't believe that formula included a public beach.  They swoop in 30 minutes before a bar closes and talk a tourist that is there on her last night of holiday to leave with them.  They had a place to go and it was not rolling around in the sand.


That is why I believe this happened at a motel/hotel or some place near the beach.  They may have gone to the VDS house but I just do not believe it happened there.  I think Paulus had found a room at a hotel/motel and it occurred somewhere near the HI, perhaps even the HI.  How do we know what those cameras showed or did not show ? If it showed them taking Natlaee there, you know the powers that be at HI, had that all deleted and redone by the time Beth arrived.  No way did they want their little house of horrors involved in this and thus, the nice gesture to let Beth stay so she would be less than wise to their goings-on.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Jerry from Ohio on June 29, 2006, 05:47:55 PM
I think Bro Easy  can and should have an amen for that last statement   AMEN !!
   Now lets not get bogged down about the other sites  as most of us really know their agenda and what their doing.  
>>  Easy said in part >>>
I think BFN is a good site.  For the most part they discuss the case much as we do with very few disruptive types always there stirring the pot.

The site I was talking about goes beyond anything that could be considered normal behavior.  Earlier their favorite topic was about Natalee running away because she was getting forced to get a nose job.  Another topic had to do with her taste in prom outfits.  Then the thread that prompted my post was a challenge to Beth to publicly answer some of their ridiculous questions since they knew she spent a lot of time reading their board.  I think they even decide what pseudonym she was using while reading all their insightful posts.

Now that chit just ain’t normal I tell ya![/quote]

AMEN Again Easy OlBud !!!  Jerry  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on June 29, 2006, 05:51:10 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "Shizaru"
Quote from: "Peaches"
You don't go to beach and get sand in your pants when you have a perfectly good clean (I guess that's relative) bed at home.  Doesn't make sense.  Someone as bright and studious as the sporter would surely be able to decide between getting laid at home and getting sand in his naughty neighborhood.  I believe they were at the house.  I bet something small from Natalee's pocket (like her driver's license, underwear or something) ended up under the bed or under a pile of dirty clothes and Anita found it when she got home, heard about the incident and cleaned up the crime scene.


Not when it's consensual, no.   But there are several reasons why a deserted beach near her hotel would be better suited for a nonconsensual encounter than his apt.


These punks had this down to a science and I don't believe that formula included a public beach.  They swoop in 30 minutes before a bar closes and talk a tourist that is there on her last night of holiday to leave with them.  They had a place to go and it was not rolling around in the sand.


That is why I believe this happened at a motel/hotel or some place near the beach.  They may have gone to the VDS house but I just do not believe it happened there.  I think Paulus had found a room at a hotel/motel and it occurred somewhere near the HI, perhaps even the HI.  How do we know what those cameras showed or did not show ? If it showed them taking Natlaee there, you know the powers that be at HI, had that all deleted and redone by the time Beth arrived.  No way did they want their little house of horrors involved in this and thus, the nice gesture to let Beth stay so she would be less than wise to their goings-on.


Someplace like THE MILL RESORT?  Where Loco Stef was as in the Bailey Ann last night in Aruba??

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/Steflocowildnight2.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Ono on June 29, 2006, 05:51:34 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Peaches has got it, I know I think Anita is the wiser here - where is San???

San like me thinks Anita knows a plenty  :lol:


I'm one of those also. Anita is used to 'running the show' around her house it looks like to me, and sooner or later, she found/figured everything out. She's The General.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: sb on June 29, 2006, 05:51:50 PM
For any of our Alabama Monkeys that haven't heard yet...

2 of this state's biggest THUGS will be donning pinstripes soon!

Don Siegelman and Richard Scrushy are both CONVICTED on multiple counts involving fraud and extortion today.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on June 29, 2006, 05:52:11 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"


That is why I believe this happened at a motel/hotel or some place near the beach.  They may have gone to the VDS house but I just do not believe it happened there.  I think Paulus had found a room at a hotel/motel and it occurred somewhere near the HI, perhaps even the HI.  How do we know what those cameras showed or did not show ? If it showed them taking Natlaee there, you know the powers that be at HI, had that all deleted and redone by the time Beth arrived.  No way did they want their little house of horrors involved in this and thus, the nice gesture to let Beth stay so she would be less than wise to their goings-on.


I don't know.  I've never been of the belief that Paulus had any involvement deeper then helping to conceal the crime after the fact (and disposing of her body).  I just can't (for whatever reason) see him being directly involved with her rape and murder...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Peaches on June 29, 2006, 05:53:16 PM
It's happy hour here.

Is everybody happy?  

I'm working on it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on June 29, 2006, 05:54:18 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"


Someplace like THE MILL RESORT?  Where Loco Stef was as in the Bailey Ann last night in Aruba??

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/Steflocowildnight2.jpg)


Who's Loco Stef?  Forgive me if this is a dumb question...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Peaches on June 29, 2006, 05:54:19 PM
Quote from: "sb"
For any of our Alabama Monkeys that haven't heard yet...

2 of this state's biggest THUGS will be donning pinstripes soon!

Don Siegelman and Richard Scrushy are both CONVICTED on multiple counts involving fraud and extortion today.


Good.  Maybe they can by roomies with those Enron crooks.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Ono on June 29, 2006, 05:54:39 PM
Quote from: "sb"
For any of our Alabama Monkeys that haven't heard yet...

2 of this state's biggest THUGS will be donning pinstripes soon!

Don Siegelman and Richard Scrushy are both CONVICTED on multiple counts involving fraud and extortion today.


WOO HOO!!!!!! Had not heard that yet!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Hotr damn! Justice WAS served. :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Peaches on June 29, 2006, 05:55:36 PM
Geez, I forgot about the Mill Resort and Stef.  I need a flowchart to keep all this stuff straight!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Ono on June 29, 2006, 05:57:05 PM
I should have probably said that Joran was The General and Anita is the Lt. General. I still cannot get over his "rubbing" of his parents' shoulders and his mother's hair..yuk.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Ono on June 29, 2006, 05:57:43 PM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Geez, I forgot about the Mill Resort and Stef.  I need a flowchart to keep all this stuff straight!


I wonder where Loco Stef is these days?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: blah on June 29, 2006, 05:58:32 PM
whoever was wonderng if the police knew J2K's 1st story was BS or not when they arrested the security guards:


Quote
within 72 hours (by 6-3), we knew that their first story was totally fabricated, that within the first 72 hours, I faced a room of 12 — at least 12 detectives, Aruban and Dutch detectives, and a lead detective, Dennis Jacobs, and they knew after we reviewed video footage from the Holiday Inn casino lobby that my daughter had never been brought back to the Holiday Inn. They knew that those suspects were fabricating a story from day one.” “Something that the family knew—and we have to keep reminding everyone--after 72 hours---72 hours---we knew definitively that these suspects were not telling the truth. We knew that my daughter had never been brought back to the Holiday Inn. Of course we were becoming frustrated. Who wouldn‘t, at this point? You know, we—and what was so unbelievable about this, is they knew this information and still chose to pursue the two security guards on June the 5th.” “I‘ve been hearing about possible new arrests or persons of interest being questioned through the media. So it would be nice to be getting that from Deputy Dompig or Karin Janssen herself.”


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on June 29, 2006, 05:59:02 PM
Thirdstrike - in March 2005 we have photos of Joran, Deepak and Freddy have fun with a tourist girl and her friend on their last night in Aruba.  Bailey Ann and her girlfriend.  Loco Stef is an Aruban girl that befriended Bailey Ann and is seen in this photo:

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/deepakcar.jpg)
(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/arubamarch84.jpg)

We suspect that this photo of Loco Stef at THE MILL RESORT was taken that same night:

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/Steflocowildnight2.jpg)

Here is an earlier photo of Joran with Loco Stef:

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/Stef_loco_latina.jpg)[/b]


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on June 29, 2006, 06:00:32 PM
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "sb"
For any of our Alabama Monkeys that haven't heard yet...

2 of this state's biggest THUGS will be donning pinstripes soon!

Don Siegelman and Richard Scrushy are both CONVICTED on multiple counts involving fraud and extortion today.


WOO HOO!!!!!! Had not heard that yet!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Hotr damn! Justice WAS served. :D


Ono, I am so glad you are here with me to cheer.   :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: ala_gunslinger on June 29, 2006, 06:00:35 PM
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "klaasend"


Someplace like THE MILL RESORT?  Where Loco Stef was as in the Bailey Ann last night in Aruba??

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/Steflocowildnight2.jpg)


Who's Loco Stef?  Forgive me if this is a dumb question...


Who is Bailey Anne?  I know she was photographed with the goons, but what happened?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on June 29, 2006, 06:02:20 PM
Quote from: "ala_gunslinger"
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "klaasend"


Someplace like THE MILL RESORT?  Where Loco Stef was as in the Bailey Ann last night in Aruba??

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/Steflocowildnight2.jpg)


Who's Loco Stef?  Forgive me if this is a dumb question...


Who is Bailey Anne?  I know she was photographed with the goons, but what happened?


Based on conversations with Melody, I would say she might have been a stand-in or possibly a partner with Loco Steph.  Just speculating, you know.  Nothing in granite or marble.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on June 29, 2006, 06:04:15 PM
Tylergal - I would not be surprised at all if Melody was another one of their local girls sent to help them "get the tourist girls".


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: ala_gunslinger on June 29, 2006, 06:04:22 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "sb"
For any of our Alabama Monkeys that haven't heard yet...

2 of this state's biggest THUGS will be donning pinstripes soon!

Don Siegelman and Richard Scrushy are both CONVICTED on multiple counts involving fraud and extortion today.


WOO HOO!!!!!! Had not heard that yet!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Hotr damn! Justice WAS served. :D


Ono, I am so glad you are here with me to cheer.   :lol:  :lol:


Was it justice?  Or just jurists that didn't want to deal with it over the 4th of July weekend?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Ono on June 29, 2006, 06:05:35 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "sb"
For any of our Alabama Monkeys that haven't heard yet...

2 of this state's biggest THUGS will be donning pinstripes soon!

Don Siegelman and Richard Scrushy are both CONVICTED on multiple counts involving fraud and extortion today.


WOO HOO!!!!!! Had not heard that yet!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Hotr damn! Justice WAS served. :D


Ono, I am so glad you are here with me to cheer.   :lol:  :lol:


 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol: Me too Tyler! I can't even link onto Alabama Live right now...must be crowds trying to get on.  It's sooooo long overdue!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Ono on June 29, 2006, 06:07:13 PM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "sb"
For any of our Alabama Monkeys that haven't heard yet...

2 of this state's biggest THUGS will be donning pinstripes soon!

Don Siegelman and Richard Scrushy are both CONVICTED on multiple counts involving fraud and extortion today.


Good.  Maybe they can by roomies with those Enron crooks.


They make the Enron fellas look like choirboys.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Ono on June 29, 2006, 06:08:52 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Tylergal - I would not be surprised at all if Melody was another one of their local girls sent to help them "get the tourist girls".


I bet there are more than two of them too.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: sb on June 29, 2006, 06:13:23 PM
YES, justice was served.

Fourth of July or not, those two cancerous thugs have bribed and swindled and peddled influence for the last time. The NERVE siegeljerk had to actually run for governor while being tried for these charges...

Now let's nail Terry Butts and Doug Jones and this state will be a long way toward cleaning up the thugs AND their crook attorneys.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: wreck on June 29, 2006, 06:13:49 PM
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "sb"
For any of our Alabama Monkeys that haven't heard yet...

2 of this state's biggest THUGS will be donning pinstripes soon!

Don Siegelman and Richard Scrushy are both CONVICTED on multiple counts involving fraud and extortion today.


WOO HOO!!!!!! Had not heard that yet!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Hotr damn! Justice WAS served. :D


Ono, I am so glad you are here with me to cheer.   :lol:  :lol:


 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol: Me too Tyler! I can't even link onto Alabama Live right now...must be crowds trying to get on.  It's sooooo long overdue!

I googled "Richard Scrushy" -- and it said he was ACQUITTED on all charges?!?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: wreck on June 29, 2006, 06:16:49 PM
Quote from: "wreck"
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "sb"
For any of our Alabama Monkeys that haven't heard yet...

2 of this state's biggest THUGS will be donning pinstripes soon!

Don Siegelman and Richard Scrushy are both CONVICTED on multiple counts involving fraud and extortion today.


WOO HOO!!!!!! Had not heard that yet!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Hotr damn! Justice WAS served. :D


Ono, I am so glad you are here with me to cheer.   :lol:  :lol:


 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol: Me too Tyler! I can't even link onto Alabama Live right now...must be crowds trying to get on.  It's sooooo long overdue!

I googled "Richard Scrushy" -- and it said he was ACQUITTED on all charges?!?


..sorry it was dated June 29th, 2005!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: sb on June 29, 2006, 06:16:50 PM
That was from the last time he was tried, last year. This is an entirely different trial today. Believe me, he won't be cracking open the champagne tonight like he did last year! Arrogant jerk.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on June 29, 2006, 06:17:07 PM
http://beta.abc3340.com/news/stories/0606/340465.html

Siegelman, Scrushy Convicted On Federal Charges


Montgomery (AP) -     Former Gov. Don Siegelman and former Health South CEO Richard Scrushy were convicted Thursday in a bribery scheme that derailed Siegelman's campaign to retake his former office.
(snipped)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on June 29, 2006, 06:17:58 PM
KLAAS, let's not forget that Melody was explainng how close she lived to the Marriott and Joran knew a short cut from her house to his house from there.  It sounds like to me this was a routine.  I asked her if Joran liked rough sex to which she replied "only once in a blue moon."  I asked her if there were two moons in May 2005.  I don't think it computated with her, but that "once in a blue moon," might mean when he picks up tourist girls.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: terryd270 on June 29, 2006, 06:18:21 PM
Remember that 16 year old that came to the defense of Joran and she had no problem saying that Joran and her were intimate and that he was such a gentleman when staying with them, here in the states.. I thought that was strange, what happen to being sweet 16 and the parents seemed to have no problem with it.. That Melody seemed to be the same type of girl and I'm sure no girl with any class would be defending Joran..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on June 29, 2006, 06:19:26 PM
Quote from: "terryd270"
Remember that 16 year old that came to the defense of Joran and she had no problem saying that Joran and her were intimate and that he was such a gentleman when staying with them, here in the states.. I thought that was strange, what happen to being sweet 16 and the parents seemed to have no problem with it.. That Melody seemed to be the same type of girl and I'm sure no girl with any class would be defending Joran..


What kind of mother would have allowed that?  Like mother, like daughter, like mother.  

Hi, Terry.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: sb on June 29, 2006, 06:19:36 PM
wreck, I've had Google do that to me before, they are TERRIBLE about time tags and the like! It can be confusing to follow cases like that sometimes when all there is is a name to look up.

If you google Natalee you may get an article from yesterday and an article from last year at the same time.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on June 29, 2006, 06:20:03 PM
Quote from: "terryd270"
Remember that 16 year old that came to the defense of Joran and she had no problem saying that Joran and her were intimate and that he was such a gentleman when staying with them, here in the states.. I thought that was strange, what happen to being sweet 16 and the parents seemed to have no problem with it.. That Melody seemed to be the same type of girl and I'm sure no girl with any class would be defending Joran..


Shelby Cadmus:

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/ShelbyCadmus.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: wreck on June 29, 2006, 06:21:40 PM
Quote from: "sb"
wreck, I've had Google do that to me before, they are TERRIBLE about time tags and the like! It can be confusing to follow cases like that sometimes when all there is is a name to look up.

If you google Natalee you may get an article from yesterday and an article from last year at the same time.

Thanks, it was a WaPo article dated June 29th,2005 --- that is what threw me!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on June 29, 2006, 06:21:49 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
KLAAS, let's not forget that Melody was explainng how close she lived to the Marriott and Joran knew a short cut from her house to his house from there.  It sounds like to me this was a routine.  I asked her if Joran liked rough sex to which she replied "only once in a blue moon."  I asked her if there were two moons in May 2005.  I don't think it computated with her, but that "once in a blue moon," might mean when he picks up tourist girls.


Melody on the left - very "close" to Joran:

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/melody2.jpg)
(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/melody.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Jerry from Ohio on June 29, 2006, 06:22:01 PM
Ono, Can ya imagine  Ol Joran and Anita in  a consensual sexual relationship ? Now keep an open mind all,  the Dutch culture is far far more permissive and Kinky  then any thing that we in the USA can imagine ,  I thought about this when the pantie  description came out  but yet NO one as a hard copy of it even when i wrote te GVS wire all I was told was that it was only Gretas sense of  how orrific  the sex tales told to her by Anita were so shocking to hear .
  is it also possable that Anita  get's turned on  by  talking about these things or is possably Bisexual ?
  and I do have a very very strong feeling that PVDS
would with very little prodding jump into a sexual consensual or  not  sexual trist with an obviousley  underage girl if he had the chance and his wife was absent right >?
  Now I know these thoughts are very unsetteling to some and I say them not to be titalating  but just to point out the non conviential sexual acts that these people are possably capable of  and as for the Kalpo bros  I believe that they would have intercourse with a snake if someone promised to hold it's head,  they are just that low  especially DeePak that scumbag .
  I sincerly hope that this dosent offend  but I think that when this all over that we all may be more shocked then any of us think .
 and as for her passing I can and do send up smoke that NH's passing was quick and that the Lord made it as painless as he could .
  I am sorry  I do not think that it was a accidental fall or any type of an accident Murder intentiontal with no remorse .
 Please do not make it look any better then it is
  and as always this just my own personal opinion
  Jerry from Ohio  



Quote from: "Ono"
I should have probably said that Joran was The General and Anita is the Lt. General. I still cannot get over his "rubbing" of his parents' shoulders and his mother's hair..yuk.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: terryd270 on June 29, 2006, 06:22:29 PM
Hi Tylergal,

Yes Melody was on RWV posting and I used to think that she was clueless and was there to muddy the waters.. She actually messed up a few times because she was the one that let the cat out of the bag about Joran having the friend (Freddy) sleep over.. They are all in the same gang and I'm sure the gang (PIMPS) have some girls too..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: terryd270 on June 29, 2006, 06:25:42 PM
Klassend thats correct (Shelby Cadmus) I thought that her parents should of been arrested for how they raised that girl.. She was 16 at the time she was talking and had no problem saying that Joran stayed in her room at her parents house while he was here and that his one problem was he left stuff on the floor in their room, I guess his shoes or condom's..  I think if I knew her parents I would not have anything nice to say..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: terryd270 on June 29, 2006, 06:28:21 PM
Jerry from Ohio,  I don't think we can even come closed to what goes on, on that slutty little island.. I'm sure that its a real cess pool of perversions..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on June 29, 2006, 06:34:41 PM
Jerry, I have had these for the longest time, waiting for someone to mention it.

www.stolenchildren.net/pr/morality.html


www.family.org/fofmag/pp/a0024006.cfm


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: terryd270 on June 29, 2006, 06:39:44 PM
Here is a part that got to me with that young American girl;

S. CADMUS: I wouldn’t be as attracted to him and the more, he lived with me for three weeks, so obviously, you know, you start fighting, and just minor fights, “Oh, you left your cereal bowl on the table, you have to clean up after yourself,” just minor fights.  Obviously, we would become frustrated with each other living with each other for three weeks.  And no violence, no anger at all, just very calm and subdued.

ABRAMS: And when you would reject advances, it sounds like Mom is suggesting that there was some point when you were no longer interested in him?

S. CADMUS: Toward the end of the three weeks, I wasn’t interested in him in a romantic way, more of just friends, and we got to know each other more over these three weeks and I saw him as a friend.

She was telling this with her Mother sitting there smiling..  I guess I will take a walk this just makes me mad to think there are parents out there that have no principles or judgments rasing kids..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: terryd270 on June 29, 2006, 06:44:44 PM
WOW now I really need to take a walk that not right..  Tylergal I guess its part of their culture and I try not to judge but stuff like this makes you feel that they really are just pretentious pieces of Eurotrash?  I will go for now, I think I need a break..


www.stolenchildren.net/pr/morality.html


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Jerry from Ohio on June 29, 2006, 06:45:51 PM
Quote from: "terryd270"
Jerry from Ohio,  I don't think we can even come closed to what goes on, on that slutty little island.. I'm sure that its a real cess pool of perversions..


  Terry  I have never been there and will never go there! But i personly know of quite a few bands that have played there about 15 to 20 years ago and when the guys got together and talked  all they talked about was that if you had American dollars  there was NOTHING that you could not get  or see .
 Now i do not imagine  things have changed all that much.
    Jerry from Ohio


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: whytegirl on June 29, 2006, 06:45:54 PM
Sorry that I keep going at it, but I found the transcription and I want you to read what Bush said today with regards to the missing young woman in N. Korea.  It would've been nice if he told that to Beth.  After that I have to get off.  Thanks.


President Bush and Japanese Prime Minister Koizumi Participate in a Joint Press Availability The East Room

President's Remarks
 view  

      Fact Sheet: The Japan-U.S. Alliance of the New Century
      In Focus: Global Diplomacy


11:33 A.M. EDT

PRESIDENT BUSH: Thank you all. Please be seated. Mr. Prime Minister, as I said on the South Lawn, we are delighted to have you here in Washington. The Prime Minister and I have got a very friendly relationship. We've just had two hours of discussions. We talked about a lot of areas of mutual concern. I've reminded the Prime Minister -- the American people, Mr. Prime Minister, over the past months that it was not always a given that the United States and America [sic] would have a close relationship. After all, 60 years we were at war -- 60 years ago we were at war, and today we talked about North Korea, and Iran, and Iraq, and trade, and energy cooperation.

 It's amazing fact that we're able to have these discussions. To me it shows the power of liberty and democracy to transform enemies to allies and to help transform the world. And one thing about the Prime Minister is he understands that. He's a firm believer that -- in universal values. He believes in freedom. And he's willing to act on those beliefs. And we have been a strong partner in peace, Mr. Prime Minister.

You've had a remarkable tenure as the Prime Minister of your country. You have led with courage, you have made hard decisions. You've helped us change our relationship so that Japan and the United States will be able to work even closer together in the 21st century. You made the hard decision to help realign our troops in your part of the world to better accommodate the needs of the Japanese people, and at the same time, keep in position a relationship that will be necessary for peace and stability.

I want to thank you for opening your markets to U.S. beef. I think the Japanese people are going to like the taste of U.S. beef. As a matter of fact, I had a good slice of beef last night, and you told me you did, as well, and you look like you're feeling pretty good. (Laughter.)

PRIME MINISTER KOIZUMI: Very good. (Laughter.)

PRESIDENT BUSH: Right, good. We had an interesting discussion about energy. One of the things that Japan and the United States can do is we can help provide technologies that will improve the climate, as well as reduce our dependence on hydrocarbons. We discussed the Nuclear Suppliers Group that we're a part of, and our contributions to some research and development that will help speed up fast breeder reactors and new types of reprocessing so that we can help deal with the cost of globalization when it comes to energy; make ourselves more secure, economically, as well as make us less dependent on hydrocarbons from parts of the world that may not agree with our policies.

We -- as I mentioned, we discussed Iraq and Afghanistan. By the way, the Japanese defense forces did a really good job when they were in Iraq. And they're able to leave because they did such a good job. And now the Iraqis will be running the province in which the Japanese forces used to be. Nevertheless, the Prime Minister, as he mentioned in the comments, will continue to provide airlift capacity and naval help.

 The North Korean issue is one, obviously, that's got everybody's attention now. And we discussed this issue in length. We both agree that it's very important for us to remain united in sending a clear message to the North Korean leader that, first of all, launching the missile is unacceptable. There have been no briefings as to what's on top of the missile. He hasn't told anybody where the missile is going. He has an obligation, it seems like to me, and the Prime Minister, that there be a full briefing to those of us who are concerned about this issue as to what his intentions are. It makes sense, doesn't it? It's a reasonable thing for somebody to do.

We talked about the six-party talks, and to make sure we remain bound up in sending a clear message to the leader of North Korea. I also talked about one of the most touching moments of my presidency, when the mom of the abducted daughter came to the Oval Office and talked to me about what it was like to have a young daughter abducted by the North Koreans. And it really broke my heart. I told the Prime Minister it was -- it was a moving moment for me. I just could not imagine what it would be like to have somebody have taken, you know, my daughter -- one of my daughters -- and never be able to see her again. And the woman showed such great courage, Mr. Prime Minister, when she came and shared her story with me. It took everything I could not to weep, listening to her.

It also reminded me about the nature of the regime -- what kind of regime would kidnap people, just take them off offshore, you know; what kind of person would not care about how that woman felt.

And so we talked about the need to work together to bring a resolution to this issue about nuclear weapons. And I reminded the Prime Minister -- he didn't need reminding, but I'm going to share with him once again my deep concern about the human condition inside North Korea. He shares that condition -- after all, he's the Prime Minister of a country that has suffered a lot as a result of abductions. So we spent time talking about abductions.

All in all, it was a visit that I knew was going to be a good one because I know the man; I know what he's like: he's a good thinker, he's a strategic thinker, he's a clear speaker. And, plus, as you all know, it's become quite well-known that we're going to visit Graceland tomorrow. He's an Elvis fan. Laura and I gave him a jukebox as a gift, and I can't -- what was the first song you put on? It wasn't "Hound Dog," it was --

 PRIME MINISTER KOIZUMI: "I Want You, I Need You, I Love You."

PRESIDENT BUSH: See, he loves Elvis, and I couldn't think of a better way to honor my friend by going to Graceland. But it also sends a signal about how close our relationship is.

And so Mr. Prime Minister, we're glad you're here. Thanks for your friendship, thanks for your alliance, and thanks for your leadership.

PRIME MINISTER KOIZUMI: (As translated.) Thank you very much. With President Bush, I had a very candid exchange of views. Over the past five years, I've really had a close friendship with President Bush, and thanks to that we've been able to have a very candid exchange of views. And I believe this is not just limited to close relations between us, personally, but I believe this close relationship is necessary in the future between Japan and the United States, as well.

Japan and the United States is in a Japan-U.S. alliance in the world, and we confirmed that we can cooperate with each other on various challenges, maintain Japan's security and deterrence, and reduce burdens on local communities. On these points we were able to have a very important agreement, and we're most grateful for that.

In the meeting, we discussed not just Japan-U.S. bilateral relations, but numerous challenges that the world community faces today -- Afghanistan, North Korea, poverty reduction -- reduced poverty for people who suffer from various diseases. We shared common perception, and by doing so we'll be able to cooperate with each other.

Now, Japan, in a way different than the U.S., has been supporting the nation-building in Iraq by the Iraqis, themselves. The ground self-defense forces stationed in Samawa, having accomplished their mission, will be withdrawing. But as a responsible member of the international community, through cooperation with various countries concerned and through cooperation with the United Nations, Japan will continue provide support and help the Iraqis get back on their feet.

With regard to North Korea, we spent a lot of time, and I expressed my views, and President Bush also expressed his thoughts. President Bush was kind enough to meet with Mrs. Sakie Yokota. And he told me he was very moved on that occasion. Anyone, if one's daughter is abducted, naturally will be grieved. And this feeling need be shared by Americans and Japanese. And we discussed that sort of thing.

We do have the six-party talks framework. Japan and the United States, I believe, need to maintain close coordination and encourage North Korea to become a responsible member of the international community.

With regard to Iranian nuclear proliferation, Japan also is concerned about this problem. The United States attaches importance to cooperation with EU and other countries concerned. Japan certainly supports that U.S. stance of seeking resolution through a dialogue regarding the nuclear proliferation issue. The Iranian issue remains a grave issue for the entire world economy, and Japan wishes to cooperate with the United States and other countries concerned on this matter, as well.

On U.N. reforms, building on the results achieved so far, we would like to work out with the G4 a proposal that can be supported by the United States and achieve reforms in the United Nations and the Security Council. Japan and the United States will maintain close coordination and partnership. We need to do that and address various challenges.

The Japan-U.S. alliance is not just an alliance for our two countries; it is an alliance for the world. And in the interest of the world we were able to confirm that we need to cooperate with each other, and I think this was a very substantive, fruitful meeting. And I would like to thank President Bush and the U.S. for a very warm, hospitable welcome.

PRESIDENT BUSH: We've agreed to take two questions a side. Walking in, I reminded the Prime Minister of one of Elvis's greatest songs, "Don't Be Cruel" -- (laughter) -- so keep that in mind, Hunt, when you ask your question.

Q Thank you, Mr. President. You've said that you wanted to close the prison at Guantanamo Bay, but you were waiting for the Supreme Court decision that came out today. Do you intend now to close the Guantanamo Bay quickly? And how do you deal with the suspects that you've said were too dangerous to be released or sent home?

PRESIDENT BUSH: Thank you for the question on a court ruling that literally came out in the midst of my meeting with the Prime Minister -- and so I haven't had a chance to fully review the findings of the Supreme Court. I, one, assure you that we take them very seriously. Two, that to the extent that there is latitude to work with the Congress to determine whether or not the military tribunals will be an avenue in which to give people their day in court, we will do so.

The American people need to know that this ruling, as I understand it, won't cause killers to be put out on the street. In other words, there's not a -- it was a drive-by briefing on the way here, I was told that this was not going to be the case. At any rate, we will seriously look at the findings, obviously. And one thing I'm not going to do, though, is I'm not going to jeopardize the safety of the American people. People have got to understand that. I understand we're in a war on terror; that these people were picked up off of a battlefield; and I will protect the people and, at the same time, conform with the findings of the Supreme Court.

Q Do you think the prison will close?

PRESIDENT BUSH: Well, I haven't had a chance to fully review what the court said, Terry. I wish I had, and I could have given you a better answer. As I say, we take the findings seriously. And, again, as I understand it -- now please don't hold me to this -- that there is a way forward with military tribunals in working with the United States Congress; as I understand certain senators have already been out expressing their desire to what the Supreme Court found, and we will work with the Congress. I want to find a way forward.

In other words, I have told the people that I would like for there to be a way to return people from Guantanamo to their home countries, but some of them -- people need to be tried in our courts. And that's -- the Hamdan decision was the way forward for that part of my statement, and, again, I would like to review the case. And we are, we've got people looking at it right now to determine how we can work with Congress if that's available to solve the problem.

Q On North Korea, I'd like to ask a question of both of you, Prime Minister and President. On North Korea, I understand you spent a lot of time to exchange views. It is said that the North Koreans are preparing to launch Taepodong-2. To resolve this missile issue, what kind of cooperation do you think is possible between Japan and the United States? And also, did you discuss possibly referring the matter to the U.N. Security Council?

On the abduction issue and human rights issue, I understand, Mr. President, you've shown deep concerns for the resolution of the abduction issue. What sort of cooperation do you think is possible between the U.S. and Japan?

PRESIDENT BUSH: Do you want to go? Yes, please.

PRIME MINISTER KOIZUMI: (As translated.) The North Koreans -- I believe, in the first place, we need to try and approach the North Koreans not to launch Taepodong-2 through various efforts, and should they ever launch the missile, that will cause various pressures -- we would apply various pressures. And we discussed that. I believe it is best that I do not discuss what specific pressures we were talking about.

As we approach the North Koreans, we shall maintain close cooperation and coordination with the United States, including the abduction issue.

PRESIDENT BUSH: -- all kinds of opportunities, and the U.N. is an opportunity to express our common concern. You know, another interesting opportunity is, over time, to work on missile defenses. The Japanese cannot be -- afford to be held hostage to rockets. And neither can the United States or any other body who loves freedom. And so one really interesting opportunity is for -- to share and cooperate on missile defenses.

You know, the leader of North Korea is just going to have to make a decision, does he want to be isolated from the world, or is he interested in being an active participant in kind of the nations of the world who care about their people and desire peace? It's his choice to make. We've made our choice. We believe it's important for nations such as Japan and the United States to be active participants in the world in a positive way. And that's what we're doing.

You know, a lot of the focus of our relationship is based upon, obviously, Iraq and Afghanistan, but the truth of the matter is, Japan and the United States make mighty contributions to end suffering because of disease and hunger. And that's why I appreciate the Prime Minister's leadership. He understands that with economic might comes serious responsibilities in the world. And the United States takes those responsibilities seriously, and so does Japan.

Q Yes, Mr. President. We can assume you've at least been given some of the broad strokes of the Supreme Court's decision on Guantanamo --

PRESIDENT BUSH: I just gave you the answer on that. I'll be glad to answer another question -- I gave you the broad strokes I've been given.

Q Right, but this -- can you comment on what looks like a judicial repudiation of your administration's policy on the treatment of terror suspects post-9/11?

PRESIDENT BUSH: Matt, I can't -- I wish I could comment, and would, obviously. I'm a person who generally comments on things. I haven't been briefed enough to make a comment on it, except for the following things. I'm sorry you had to waste your question, but we will conform to the Supreme Court, we will analyze the decision. To the extent that the Congress has given any latitude to develop a way forward using military tribunals, we will work with them.

As I understand, a Senator has already been on TV. Haven't seen it, haven't heard what he said, but as -- they briefed me and said he wants to devise law in conformity with the case that would enable us to use a military tribunal to hold these people to account. And if that's the case, we'll work with him. But that's -- I can't comment any more than I have just done in the first question. Otherwise I would have. I just haven't been fully briefed enough to answer your question, Matt.

Q (As translated.) Over the past five years, Prime Minister Koizumi and President Bush have built up the best sort of relationship between the two of you in the history of Japan and the United States. Now, what is the greatest reason for having maintained this policy of attaching greatest importance to Japan-U.S. relations?

A question for President Bush: Various problems have occurred after 9/11. And in the Prime Minister Koizumi's policy of attaching importance to Japan-U.S. relations, what was the case, instance where you were most appreciative of Prime Minister Koizumi's position? And what sort of impact has it had -- has it had on your feeling and stance toward Japan?

PRIME MINISTER KOIZUMI: (As translated.) Well, attaching importance to our relations with the United States -- well, after the second world war, throughout, over the past six years, Japan has maintained that policy. We've recognized the importance of Japan-U.S. alliance, and also maintain a stance of international cooperation and coordination. It's because we have learned the lessons of World War II we took up this policy in believing that this was good for Japan. In the past, today, and the future, as well maintain Japan-U.S. alliance and international cooperation. This is a very important fundamental policy of Japan that should never change.

Last year, President Bush visited Kyoto in Japan and had one-on-one meeting. Some seem to think that the -- to the extent that Japan-U.S. relations is undermined, that could be complemented by better relations with Asia and other countries. And I've said I do not subscribe to that view. The better the Japan-U.S. relations, my view is that we will be able to have better relations with China and other countries and Asia.

Some in the mass media took up on that and misinterpreted my position. In other words, they felt that I was saying to the extent Japan-U.S. relations remain good, I couldn't care less what Japan's relations would be with other countries. That is not at all what I said. I've been saying that there is no country in the world that has as important bilateral relations as Japan-U.S. bilateral relations. But I have no view such as having better relations with the United States at the expense of relations with other countries.

My view is that by having better relations with the United States, I can have better relations with other countries. And from that perspective, in the post-war years, Japan has achieved remarkable growth and development. It is because we've learned lessons from the past in our relations with the United States and determined to maintain friendly relations with the United States. And that is what we have done to date.

In the future, as well, Japan-U.S. alliance is something that will be -- contribute to the resolution of various challenges in the world by maintaining friendly ties between Japan and the United States. Attaching importance to our relations with the United States does not sacrifice our views and our relations with other countries. Please do not misunderstand.

PRESIDENT BUSH: It's a pretty tricky question. I hate to point out one area where that has influenced my thinking about Japan's contributions for fear of diminishing the contributions in other areas. Because the truth of the matter is we live in a very complex world, and by cooperating to solve problems makes the world a better place. However, since you asked, I'll answer. I would think it is the Prime Minister's understanding of the capacity for democracies to help change the conditions of the world. And, therefore, his strong support for helping a new Afghanistan democracy grow and his willingness to do something a lot of other leaders in Japan have been unwilling to do, which is to commit self-defense forces to help the growth of a new democracy.

And I tell the American people this, I use the Prime Minister all the time in my speeches, as the press corps will tell you, incredibly bored of hearing. But, nevertheless, I do

share the example with the people about my relationship with the Prime Minister. It is just -- it strikes me as just amazing. A lot of people take it for granted. I don't, because 60 years ago we were at war. And something happened between our visit to Graceland and when our respective fathers looked at each other with deep suspicion. And what happened was, Japan developed a Japanese-style democracy based upon shared values. And today, we're able to discuss peace. It is a remarkable transformation of a relationship. We just happen to be the beneficiaries of that transformation. I also believe, however, that there are people who are coming up who have shedded the bonds of tyranny are also the benefits of this relationship.

And so Japan is making a mighty contribution to new democracy, which I strongly believe is in our nation's interests, and I strongly believe will yield peace. And I firmly believe that the example that we show today will be repeated over the decades, particularly with newly-elected leaders in the Middle East. And the Prime Minister understands that. And I'm grateful for the contribution of the Japanese people to the cause of peace.

Mr. Prime Minister, thank you.

PRIME MINISTER KOIZUMI: Thank you, very much, American people, for "Love Me Tender." (Laughter.)

END 12:00 P.M. EDT


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on June 29, 2006, 06:48:29 PM
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Tylergal - I would not be surprised at all if Melody was another one of their local girls sent to help them "get the tourist girls".


I bet there are more than two of them too.


What was in the deal for Loco Stephie?
a) Drugs?
b) Voyuerism?
c) Girl on girl action?
d) Profits from the videos?
e) all of the above?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: San on June 29, 2006, 06:51:37 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Peaches has got it, I know I think Anita is the wiser here - where is San???

San like me thinks Anita knows a plenty  :lol:

San is here now and Anita knows the whole deal including the discussion with her son when he discussed his sexual assault against Natalee in front of Beth and Greta.  

Obviously someone is lying because her son now says they never had sex.  Is Anita the one now making up her story.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on June 29, 2006, 06:53:57 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
http://beta.abc3340.com/news/stories/0606/340465.html

Siegelman, Scrushy Convicted On Federal Charges


Montgomery (AP) -     Former Gov. Don Siegelman and former Health South CEO Richard Scrushy were convicted Thursday in a bribery scheme that derailed Siegelman's campaign to retake his former office.
(snipped)


I worked at Health South years ago.   :shock:   :(


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: San on June 29, 2006, 07:02:52 PM
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Tylergal - I would not be surprised at all if Melody was another one of their local girls sent to help them "get the tourist girls".


I bet there are more than two of them too.


What was in the deal for Loco Stephie?
a) Drugs?
b) Voyuerism?
c) Girl on girl action?
d) Profits from the videos?
e) all of the above?

I'll pick d.

Drugs are easy to come by on that drug infested island.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: blah on June 29, 2006, 07:03:38 PM
Quote
TWITTY: Well, I hope that they see that now Joran has not only changed the pickup from being Deepak to Satish. And they need to go back, Nancy, go back to August, go back when the gardener`s statement was given before the judge of instruction, sworn testimony, the defense, the prosecutor, Deepak, Satish, and Joran.

And what happened was his statement was credible and Deepak panicked. He panicked that very day, made a phone call to a girl looking for an alibi. This young woman became very upset and concerned, made a phone call to the FBI. She did not want to be involved in it.

They need to go back. There were numerous times when their alibis were destroyed repeatedly.


who was this girl???


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Anna on June 29, 2006, 07:08:45 PM
Quote from: whytegirl
Sorry that I keep going at it, but I found the transcription and I want you to read what Bush said today with regards to the missing young woman in N. Korea.  It would've been nice if he told that to Beth.  After that I have to get off.  Thanks.


There is a tremendous difference in what Bush is talking about and what happened to Natalee.  These people were kidnapped by members of a FOREIGN GOVERNMENT.

Natalee was NOT kidnapped by PM Oduber nor some military agent in Aruba.  She is NOT being held in prison there.  She is not being held as a political prisoner. She is not being held to blackmail another government nor for prisoner exchange.   She was likely raped and murdered by three punks or thugs who are not even fully adults let alone representatives of their government.

No head of state in the entire world is going to get involved in what amounts to street crime nor should they.

Certainly not Bush for he is already in trouble for even trying to locate terrorists by their banking records.  If he had made one move to intervene in a case in another country like this, I am sure the cries for his impeachment would be deafening.

I do not understand why anybody would suggest that it is some how Bush's place to address a crime by a private citizen or group of them in another country.  And heaven help him if he did!  The liberals in this country won't allow him to protect us on U.S. soil let alone in a foreign country!   :evil:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on June 29, 2006, 07:09:29 PM
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
Quote from: "klaasend"
http://beta.abc3340.com/news/stories/0606/340465.html

Siegelman, Scrushy Convicted On Federal Charges


Montgomery (AP) -     Former Gov. Don Siegelman and former Health South CEO Richard Scrushy were convicted Thursday in a bribery scheme that derailed Siegelman's campaign to retake his former office.
(snipped)


I worked at Health South years ago.   :shock:   :(


I am glad this is finally over.  Maybe one of the BHAMers can give us some insight to the Tajmahal that Scrushy was buiding in honor of himself that was stopped in mid construction, and what is going to be done about that or can be done about that.

Oh, yeah and will we rename Scrushy Drive and all the buildings erected to his majesty?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: wreck on June 29, 2006, 07:10:43 PM
Quote
Natalee was NOT kidnapped by PM Oduber nor some military agent in Aruba
I agree for the most part -- but don't rule out Oduber not being complicit in this!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on June 29, 2006, 07:11:09 PM
Anna, that seems to be a big problem.  So many people not understanding the laws.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: blah on June 29, 2006, 07:28:15 PM
OK, WTF is wrong with this place????????  Do i just not get it or is this just the most messed up thing you ever heard of???

Quote

Holland Launches Fun Burials

A Dutch entrepreneur is offering what he hopes will be the latest extreme sport - 'fun burials'.

For 75 euros, people can be buried 5 ft down in a coffin for an hour - under a 3.5 tonne concrete block, reports Nu.nl.

The coffin has an oxygen supply, a panic button and is linked by webcam to a computer which friends and family can watch.

Dutch entertainer Eddy Daams, from Eexterveenschekanaal, is behind the idea which he calls Fun Burials.

He said: "After bunjee jumping, this will become the new extreme kick. It is very safe, nothing can go wrong.

"If the person in the coffin is having a panic attack, he can push the panic button to heave off the block."

Mr Daams is running the project in his own garden and says it should be up and running commercially this summer.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: nonesuche on June 29, 2006, 07:31:14 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Anna, that seems to be a big problem.  So many people not understanding the laws.


can you elaborate on this?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on June 29, 2006, 07:32:59 PM
Quote from: "blah"
OK, WTF is wrong with this place????????  Do i just not get it or is this just the most messed up thing you ever heard of???

Quote

Holland Launches Fun Burials

A Dutch entrepreneur is offering what he hopes will be the latest extreme sport - 'fun burials'.

For 75 euros, people can be buried 5 ft down in a coffin for an hour - under a 3.5 tonne concrete block, reports Nu.nl.

The coffin has an oxygen supply, a panic button and is linked by webcam to a computer which friends and family can watch.

Dutch entertainer Eddy Daams, from Eexterveenschekanaal, is behind the idea which he calls Fun Burials.

He said: "After bunjee jumping, this will become the new extreme kick. It is very safe, nothing can go wrong.

"If the person in the coffin is having a panic attack, he can push the panic button to heave off the block."

Mr Daams is running the project in his own garden and says it should be up and running commercially this summer.


Strange people, very barbaric and they call us Cowboys.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on June 29, 2006, 07:35:35 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Anna, that seems to be a big problem.  So many people not understanding the laws.


can you elaborate on this?


Of course.  Bush cannot do anything about what happened to Natalee, beyond offering what he has, Condi's help at the state department, FBI agents, DEA agents.  That is a soverign nation.  We cannot go in dropping bombs on Aruba because one of our citizens visited there and never returned.  This is totally different from what has happened with the wholesale of children for the World Cup.  The International Community would get involved.  

For Bush to go in there and blow up Aruba, would be like someone visiting here from London and being kidnapped at Disney World.  Tony Blair is not going to drop bombs on Florida.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: wreck on June 29, 2006, 07:36:58 PM
Quote from: "blah"
OK, WTF is wrong with this place????????  Do i just not get it or is this just the most messed up thing you ever heard of???

Quote

Holland Launches Fun Burials

A Dutch entrepreneur is offering what he hopes will be the latest extreme sport - 'fun burials'.

For 75 euros, people can be buried 5 ft down in a coffin for an hour - under a 3.5 tonne concrete block, reports Nu.nl.

The coffin has an oxygen supply, a panic button and is linked by webcam to a computer which friends and family can watch.

Dutch entertainer Eddy Daams, from Eexterveenschekanaal, is behind the idea which he calls Fun Burials.

He said: "After bunjee jumping, this will become the new extreme kick. It is very safe, nothing can go wrong.

"If the person in the coffin is having a panic attack, he can push the panic button to heave off the block."

Mr Daams is running the project in his own garden and says it should be up and running commercially this summer.

Okay, I'll bite!
I've got 75 Euros for Joran to try this! (wouldn't it be a shame if their was a malfunction???)  :roll:   :twisted:    :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: blah on June 29, 2006, 07:39:22 PM
Quote from: "wreck"
Quote from: "blah"
OK, WTF is wrong with this place????????  Do i just not get it or is this just the most messed up thing you ever heard of???

Quote

Holland Launches Fun Burials

A Dutch entrepreneur is offering what he hopes will be the latest extreme sport - 'fun burials'.

For 75 euros, people can be buried 5 ft down in a coffin for an hour - under a 3.5 tonne concrete block, reports Nu.nl.

The coffin has an oxygen supply, a panic button and is linked by webcam to a computer which friends and family can watch.

Dutch entertainer Eddy Daams, from Eexterveenschekanaal, is behind the idea which he calls Fun Burials.

He said: "After bunjee jumping, this will become the new extreme kick. It is very safe, nothing can go wrong.

"If the person in the coffin is having a panic attack, he can push the panic button to heave off the block."

Mr Daams is running the project in his own garden and says it should be up and running commercially this summer.

Okay, I'll bite!
I've got 75 Euros for Joran to try this! (wouldn't it be a shame if their was a malfunction???)  :roll:   :twisted:    :D



HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM


 :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: wreck on June 29, 2006, 07:39:30 PM
Quote
their
-- hate that! their = there

I really need to proofread before I post


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on June 29, 2006, 07:41:34 PM
Quote from: blah
OK, WTF is wrong with this place????????  Do i just not get it or is this just the most messed up thing you ever heard of???

Quote

Holland Launches Fun Burials
Quote


You couldn't pay me a millions dollars to do that.  In fact, I want to be cremated b/c I am so claustrophobic.  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on June 29, 2006, 07:42:24 PM
Quote from: "wreck"
Quote
their
-- hate that! their = there

I really need to proofread before I post


Not to worry, we all do it.  I read that in a book once where "there" was used as a pronoun and I could not make sense of what they were saying until I figured out someone had mistyped the word.  Honest mistakes happen.

With more voice recognition, we are going to be seeing more and more of that and worse. :cry:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: nonesuche on June 29, 2006, 07:43:41 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Anna, that seems to be a big problem.  So many people not understanding the laws.


can you elaborate on this?


Of course.  Bush cannot do anything about what happened to Natalee, beyond offering what he has, Condi's help at the state department, FBI agents, DEA agents.  That is a soverign nation.  We cannot go in dropping bombs on Aruba because one of our citizens visited there and never returned.  This is totally different from what has happened with the wholesale of children for the World Cup.  The International Community would get involved.  

For Bush to go in there and blow up Aruba, would be like someone visiting here from London and being kidnapped at Disney World.  Tony Blair is not going to drop bombs on Florida.


whew, I thought I'd lost my mind for a second. I understand the restrictions around Aruba vs Korea, just was concerned if we were all now not understanding law or if it's just Aruba who doesn't?  :lol:

I think Aruba writes their own laws  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: blah on June 29, 2006, 07:44:55 PM
so no one knows anything about the dame that called the FBI and told them about Deepak trying to get her to lie for him?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: tidycat on June 29, 2006, 07:46:02 PM
Anna, re President, well said.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Anna on June 29, 2006, 07:46:10 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Anna, that seems to be a big problem.  So many people not understanding the laws.


can you elaborate on this?



There is a huge difference is someone being kidnapped by a FOREIGN GOVERNMENT and by three garden variety punks.  When a FOREIGN GOVERNMENT kidnaps, it is considered an internationally hostile incident between governments.  When punks kidnap, it is regular street crime and has nothing to do with entire nations.

KIDHAPPING BY A FOREIGN GOVERNMENT is taken to be hostility by the ENTIRE NATION AGAINST ANOTHER ENTIRE NATION, not a crime against one person.  It can even be considered an act of war.

Why some want to use this to take political snipes at Bush like this I don't understand but the two things are not even close.  No, Bush certainly should never have told Beth he was sorry a foreign government kidnapped and were holding her daughter because it never happened.
Natalee is not locked up in KIA for some later use in exchange for prisoners or to blackmail our government.

She is likely dead at the hands of individuals who do NOT represent their government.  They were not acting on instructions received from their Parliament or Intelligence Services in what they did.  They acted alone on the basis of their own INDIVIDUAL evil and greed.  No government told or paid them to do what they did, at least that we are aware of and can prove.  

It is ludicrous to compare the two situations, too.  We all know Bush would be impeached in a heartbeat if he even thought about considering this a political kidnapping.  Bush is not even allowed to protect U.S. Citizens on U.S. soil let alone on foreign turf.  So if someone has proof that this was ordered by the Parliament or Military of Aruba, please present it.  Otherwise, it is apples and oranges.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on June 29, 2006, 07:46:41 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Anna, that seems to be a big problem.  So many people not understanding the laws.


can you elaborate on this?


Of course.  Bush cannot do anything about what happened to Natalee, beyond offering what he has, Condi's help at the state department, FBI agents, DEA agents.  That is a soverign nation.  We cannot go in dropping bombs on Aruba because one of our citizens visited there and never returned.  This is totally different from what has happened with the wholesale of children for the World Cup.  The International Community would get involved.  

For Bush to go in there and blow up Aruba, would be like someone visiting here from London and being kidnapped at Disney World.  Tony Blair is not going to drop bombs on Florida.


whew, I thought I'd lost my mind for a second. I understand the restrictions around Aruba vs Korea, just was concerned if we were all now not understanding law or if it's just Aruba who doesn't?  :lol:

I think Aruba writes their own laws  :lol:


None, I think it is called AL.  Ad lib it as they go. :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on June 29, 2006, 07:47:28 PM
Quote from: "blah"
so no one knows anything about the dame that called the FBI and told them about Deepak trying to get her to lie for him?


Are you referring to the one that Skeeters talked to Deepak about in the taped conversation?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on June 29, 2006, 07:50:04 PM
Quote from: "blah"
so no one knows anything about the dame that called the FBI and told them about Deepak trying to get her to lie for him?


It would be interesting to know.  I think for some reason and I don't know how and why but I get a bad feeling about Deepak being on line, either phone or computer with someone from the USA at the time this happened.  There was also the name 'STEVE' written on a piece of paper on his person with the name of a cruise ship that has been involved in human trafficking, which is owned by someone in Florida.  I wonder if there is a connection with Mr. Pink, Deepak, et al.

One of our posters from that area of the USA where Mr. Pink has been known to travel/live was very supportive and defensive about Deepak.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Anna on June 29, 2006, 07:51:02 PM
Quote from: "blah"
so no one knows anything about the dame that called the FBI and told them about Deepak trying to get her to lie for him?



I wish I did, Blah.  There was rumor long time ago that it was Melody but I don't think so.  I have no idea who she is.   :? But I would love to know and also what Deepak actually said to her.

Ignoring things like this --this is why I don't think ALE is collecting anything nor KJ has any plans to prosecute at all.  I wonder if the judge was even told about this or half the other stuff that has gone on.  Wouldn't want him to think badly of the J2K, now would we?

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on June 29, 2006, 07:53:13 PM
Anna, I wondered about Melody as well, because she inserted herself into this about the time all this was being talked about but then the newspaper people and the VDS family took control of her and caused her to change her mind, if it was indeed she who was called for the alibi.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Anna on June 29, 2006, 07:54:55 PM
Quote from: SunFreak2
Quote from: blah
OK, WTF is wrong with this place????????  Do i just not get it or is this just the most messed up thing you ever heard of???

Quote

Holland Launches Fun Burials
Quote


You couldn't pay me a millions dollars to do that.  In fact, I want to be cremated b/c I am so claustrophobic.  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:



Sunfreak,
Post that article you posted the other day about their descent into permissiveness!  It applies here and bears repeating, please.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: blah on June 29, 2006, 07:55:48 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "blah"
so no one knows anything about the dame that called the FBI and told them about Deepak trying to get her to lie for him?


Are you referring to the one that Skeeters talked to Deepak about in the taped conversation?


I dont know if it is the same girl or not.  Deepak called this girl after being in court to hear the testimony of the gardner witness.  Here is Beths quote:

"Nancy, go back to August, go back when the gardener`s statement was given before the judge of instruction, sworn testimony, the defense, the prosecutor, Deepak, Satish, and Joran.

And what happened was his statement was credible and Deepak panicked. He panicked that very day, made a phone call to a girl looking for an alibi. This young woman became very upset and concerned, made a phone call to the FBI. She did not want to be involved in it."


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on June 29, 2006, 07:59:42 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "blah"
so no one knows anything about the dame that called the FBI and told them about Deepak trying to get her to lie for him?


Are you referring to the one that Skeeters talked to Deepak about in the taped conversation?


I dont know if it is the same girl or not.  Deepak called this girl after being in court to hear the testimony of the gardner witness.  Here is Beths quote:

"Nancy, go back to August, go back when the gardener`s statement was given before the judge of instruction, sworn testimony, the defense, the prosecutor, Deepak, Satish, and Joran.

And what happened was his statement was credible and Deepak panicked. He panicked that very day, made a phone call to a girl looking for an alibi. This young woman became very upset and concerned, made a phone call to the FBI. She did not want to be involved in it."


Blah  - here's what I know.  Without naming the nickname of the poster I will say that she was a poster at SM.  She was "close" to Deepak and confided in me that Deepak was very upset with her over the FBI deal.  What it sounded like to me is that Deepak was very worried about the Gardener witness, that the Gardener may have actually seen them.  That's all I know.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: blah on June 29, 2006, 08:01:13 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "blah"
so no one knows anything about the dame that called the FBI and told them about Deepak trying to get her to lie for him?


Are you referring to the one that Skeeters talked to Deepak about in the taped conversation?


I dont know if it is the same girl or not.  Deepak called this girl after being in court to hear the testimony of the gardner witness.  Here is Beths quote:

"Nancy, go back to August, go back when the gardener`s statement was given before the judge of instruction, sworn testimony, the defense, the prosecutor, Deepak, Satish, and Joran.

And what happened was his statement was credible and Deepak panicked. He panicked that very day, made a phone call to a girl looking for an alibi. This young woman became very upset and concerned, made a phone call to the FBI. She did not want to be involved in it."



I find it interesting that she called the FBI instead of the ALE, expecially if she was in Aruba.  Did she know about ALE involvement and knew she couldnt go to them??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Anna on June 29, 2006, 08:01:24 PM
.
Well, Deepak was upset about the gardener witness because he had the fit and threw the dominoes all over the room.  I don't think he would be upset if he was not seen.


And that just blows any time line I have ever had right out of the water, too.   :?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: blah on June 29, 2006, 08:03:51 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"


Blah  - here's what I know.  Without naming the nickname of the poster I will say that she was a poster at SM.  She was "close" to Deepak and confided in me that Deepak was very upset with her over the FBI deal.  What it sounded like to me is that Deepak was very worried about the Gardener witness, that the Gardener may have actually seen them.  That's all I know.


do you still communicate with her?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: blah on June 29, 2006, 08:05:32 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
.
Well, Deepak was upset about the gardener witness because he had the fit and threw the dominoes all over the room.  I don't think he would be upset if he was not seen.


And that just blows any time line I have ever had right out of the water, too.   :?


yeah, now add to that - the gardener is gone.  What happneed to him, does anyone even know?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on June 29, 2006, 08:05:36 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "klaasend"


Blah  - here's what I know.  Without naming the nickname of the poster I will say that she was a poster at SM.  She was "close" to Deepak and confided in me that Deepak was very upset with her over the FBI deal.  What it sounded like to me is that Deepak was very worried about the Gardener witness, that the Gardener may have actually seen them.  That's all I know.


do you still communicate with her?


No, haven't for months.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on June 29, 2006, 08:07:22 PM
Blah - to let you know how long it's been, the last time I communicated with her was when we still had the PM feature.  I will tell you that she did not live in Aruba but the US.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: blah on June 29, 2006, 08:07:24 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "klaasend"


Blah  - here's what I know.  Without naming the nickname of the poster I will say that she was a poster at SM.  She was "close" to Deepak and confided in me that Deepak was very upset with her over the FBI deal.  What it sounded like to me is that Deepak was very worried about the Gardener witness, that the Gardener may have actually seen them.  That's all I know.


do you still communicate with her?


No, haven't for months.


Dam.  It sure would be nice to know if the FBI interrogated her, or at least asked a few questions.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Anna on June 29, 2006, 08:07:31 PM
Quote from: "blah"
[
yeah, now add to that - the gardener is gone.  What happneed to him, does anyone even know?


Was he deported as an illegal?  Or ran away to keep from being jailed like the current Colombian?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: igsigs on June 29, 2006, 08:09:13 PM
JQK on Greta tonight...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: blah on June 29, 2006, 08:09:40 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "blah"
[
yeah, now add to that - the gardener is gone.  What happneed to him, does anyone even know?


Was he deported as an illegal?  Or ran away to keep from being jailed like the current Colombian?


i'm pretty sure he was deported, but where to? Why? Has anyone contacted him since?  Can he still be brought back to aruba to testify if need be?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Anna on June 29, 2006, 08:10:27 PM
Blah,
I am sure the FBI took her statement.  They also did those of the MB students but ALE didn't even bother to read them for months.  Not until they decided they could be used to cast aspersions elsewhere and away from J2K.  Maybe no one has bothered to read what she said.

You have to want to build a case and be actually looking for information to find it.   :(


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on June 29, 2006, 08:10:43 PM
Quote from: "Anna"



Sunfreak,
Post that article you posted the other day about their descent into permissiveness!  It applies here and bears repeating, please.

.


This one?

Posted: Fri Jun 23, 2006 5:32 pm    Post subject:    

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Social & Domestic Issues
Replace Liberal with Morally Decayed

by Mike Thompson
Posted Jun 23, 2005

Fifty years ago, a decade after Europeans had been extricated from the hellhole of World War Two by their magnanimous American cousins, the Old World denizens again were enjoying the fruits of civility envisioned for them in their Maker’s original Garden of Eden.

Yet, British writer William Golding, eventual winner of a Nobel Price for literature, foresaw how easily barbarism again could vanquish the West’s inherent Christian decency. His Lord of the Flies, published in 1954, was the first of three allegorical novels that would explore fundamental challenges to human existence, survival and freedom. Lord of the Flies specifically describes the horrific slide into savagery by aband of young children following the crash of their plane on a small tropical island (not too unlike Aruba, in the southern Caribbean).
True to Golding’sprophetic vision, by the mid- 1960s Western Europe, including the redoubtable British Isles, had begun a hedonistic rear march into the hypnotic ancient land of Anything Goes. In the Netherlands (AKA Holland), the Dutch even would coin a word to describe their retreat to moral anarchy: gedoogcultuur, “the culture of permissiveness.” (Remember, these are the same people who a few decades earlier had contributed to English language the term “Dutch uncle,” that is, a stern, relatively decent mentor who tries to keep others on the straight and narrow path.)

Here, as Golding predicted with clarity, are some terminal, cancerous, liberal sores that today fester on Holland’s once-traditional and healthy body politic:

Scantily clad prostitutes laze about in urban storefronts so that sex-hungry passersby can window-shop for a steamy middle-of-the-day liaison. Meantime, the Sex Workers Union (blue-collar hookers) is pushing the Dutch government to allow the pimpish labor bosses to crank up in Amsterdam’s Schiphol Airport the fastfood-restaurant-sounding “YumYum Caviar Club,” which actually would be a bordello for horny in-transit travelers. (One of the Netherlands’ biggest imports has become “whordes,”so to speak, of attractive young East European women to replace the aging pool of native Dutch prostitutes.)
Local and tourist pedophiles, the most unrepentent of dirty old men, roam the land with impunity since the 1990 national “reform” legislation lowered the age of sexual consent to 12 (think of your own children and grandchildren when they were that age, one year shy of being even a teenager).
The grossest pornography available can be purchased in chain grocery stores, just down the aisle from tofu and skim milk, and graphic nudity is a big hit on “family hour” prime-time, through-the-air television.
Marriage is a legal right of homosexuals, even if it includes serial infidelity on both sides.
“Dutch treat” has become another perverted expression, no longer meaning that two people at the same table simply pay for their own share of the food or drink bill. The only Dutch “treat” today is physically, mentally and socially ruinous, and exemplified by 210 Amsterdam “coffee shops” that really are dens for foreign and domestic marijuana users, and 75 “bars” for hash heads. Holland has become the drug capital of Europe and is blamed by Britain and France for exporting at least 80% of the heroin marketed into those countries, and 100% of the trade in nightmarish psychedelic substance Ecstasy.Meantime, absorbed with systemic liberal guilt over its colonial past, the Netherlands has opened the floodgates for immigrants from Indonesia, the Islamic colony in Asia which the Dutch ruled for three
Meantime, absorbed with systemic liberal guilt over its colonial past, the Netherlands has opened the floodgates for immigrants from Indonesia, the Islamic colony in Asia which the Dutch ruled for three centuries. This has resulted in one million Muslims (6% of Netherlands’ population) living in little Holland (slightly larger than Maryland), whose four largest cities now count Muslims under age 14 as the majority of their youth. Such immigration also has resulted in an outbreak of deadly tit-for-tat terrorism between Indonesians and a handful of unapologetically militant Dutch nationalists.
All these sad details of Dutch decay are important because it goes a long way toward explaining what is happening, and not happening, in Dutch-owned Aruba, an island speck that is a world away geographically but only a heartbeat away culturally from the motherland.

No longer a colony but a full-fledged political division of the distant Netherlands, Aruba is a mélange of 70,000 multicultural souls on an island off the South American coast about the size of Washington, DC.

Like Mother Holland, Aruba boasts that its crime rate is “very low.” Also like Mother Holland, however, Aruba has a low crime rate in large part because so little tawdry and outright dangerous activity in its laissez-faire environment actually qualifies as a crime; furthermore, if such activity is criminal, the police tradition in many cases (based on the Dutch model) is to wink at the perps and head for the nearest Dunkin’van Donuts for a quick sugar-fix. In the wake of the highly reported May 20 disappearance of teenage American tourist Natalee Holloway, USA Today has reported this less-than-professional Aruban attitude toward crime statistics:

“Detailed crime statistics are hard to come by: In 2003, the most recent year with available data, there were 4,236 crimes, though no specifics on those against tourists. According to Aruba's attorney general, five homicides were reported last year. But police have not provided a breakdown of offenses since 1995, says Martijn Balkestein of the Central Bureau of Statistics.”

A more frightening portrait of Dutch/Aruban police incompetence in dealing with “noncriminal criminals” emerged in an Associated Press story that details how Natalee’skinfolk in Alabama, not the Karibbean Kops, nailed the prime suspect, the playboy son of an influential local official:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on June 29, 2006, 08:12:19 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Blah - to let you know how long it's been, the last time I communicated with her was when we still had the PM feature.  I will tell you that she did not live in Aruba but the US.


Was she a Super Hero?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Anna on June 29, 2006, 08:12:39 PM
.
Yes, Sunfreak,
Thanks!  That is a very good explanation of what is wrong with them and why they think we are also like they are.

 :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on June 29, 2006, 08:13:22 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "blah"
so no one knows anything about the dame that called the FBI and told them about Deepak trying to get her to lie for him?


Are you referring to the one that Skeeters talked to Deepak about in the taped conversation?


I dont know if it is the same girl or not.  Deepak called this girl after being in court to hear the testimony of the gardner witness.  Here is Beths quote:

"Nancy, go back to August, go back when the gardener`s statement was given before the judge of instruction, sworn testimony, the defense, the prosecutor, Deepak, Satish, and Joran.

And what happened was his statement was credible and Deepak panicked. He panicked that very day, made a phone call to a girl looking for an alibi. This young woman became very upset and concerned, made a phone call to the FBI. She did not want to be involved in it."



I find it interesting that she called the FBI instead of the ALE, expecially if she was in Aruba.  Did she know about ALE involvement and knew she couldnt go to them??


She contacted the FBI because she lives in the United States. At least that is what I presume given the fact she called them first. :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: KatzHome on June 29, 2006, 08:13:38 PM
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
I think we should forget about the "other" message boards (well, at least the "dirty" ones) from this point forward.  We represent the best of the best here.  They are simply jealous of that.  Ever notice that those sites are filled with our "banished ones"?  It rarely happens in reverse of that.  That says someting about the quality of content here.  We should ALL be proud of that fact...


Scared Monkeys truly is the very best site around ~ Red and Tom and Mrs. Red have Hearts of Gold for having this site for us.  Klaas is truly a class act ~ a Heart of Gold and the patience of a Saint ~ and artistic and funny to boot!  Red's Front Page Posts are read and quoted on Natalee boards everywhere.  And twice now the Monkeys have gathered together for a full day of prayer ~ and the second time even included people who don't even post here!

This place is a refuge for me.  Yeah, I'm sitting back and just mostly agreeing with the Monkeys ~ I mostly post OT stuff, some graphics and just say hello here ~ everything that can and should be said on the case has already been said by one of the other Monkeys.

BTW ~ the Monkeys are truly THE BEST POSTERS that I've ever had the pleasure of posting with.

I am so very thankful that I don't have to make posts defending Natalee or Beth or anyone in Natalee's family ~ thankful that I don't have to post in defense of the major players who are helping the family ~ thankful that I don't have to defend myself for boycotting Aruba and the Netherlands and the products that the Netherlands exports ~ thankful that I post with people who care enough to put a Natalee bumper sticker on their cars ~ and who are angry enough to put a Boycott Aruba bumper sticker on there too!

And truly thankful that those who do not support the family, who oppose all help for the family ~ will not find a home here.

Yeah, I post sometimes at BFN and now at PFN ~ but there really is no place like the Monkey Cage ~ and I can't even be bothered reading at any other sites ~ I don't even want their garbage to be filtered through my mind.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Anna on June 29, 2006, 08:14:31 PM
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
[
Was she a Super Hero?


Right out of Marvel comics??   :shock:

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on June 29, 2006, 08:14:38 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
JQK on Greta tonight...


Thanks for the heads up!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: blah on June 29, 2006, 08:14:50 PM
Didnt Jossy have some connection to the gardner witness? Maybe we could find out more from him.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on June 29, 2006, 08:17:32 PM
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Blah - to let you know how long it's been, the last time I communicated with her was when we still had the PM feature.  I will tell you that she did not live in Aruba but the US.


Was she a Super Hero?

 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

Heck no!!  NO WAY!  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: KatzHome on June 29, 2006, 08:19:06 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Peaches has got it, I know I think Anita is the wiser here - where is San???

San like me thinks Anita knows a plenty  :lol:


make that three of us


Make that four +


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: blah on June 29, 2006, 08:19:29 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"

She contacted the FBI because she lives in the United States. At least that is what I presume given the fact she called them first. :wink:


so she lives in the US but just happened to be in Aruba the night they killed Natalee??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on June 29, 2006, 08:21:11 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"

She contacted the FBI because she lives in the United States. At least that is what I presume given the fact she called them first. :wink:


so she lives in the US but just happened to be in Aruba the night they killed Natalee??


Oh blah, i really don't know.

I just assumed reading these posts that if she called the FBI she was American. I could be way off base.

Just a hunch, that's all.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: blah on June 29, 2006, 08:24:28 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"

She contacted the FBI because she lives in the United States. At least that is what I presume given the fact she called them first. :wink:


so she lives in the US but just happened to be in Aruba the night they killed Natalee??


Oh blah, i really don't know.

I just assumed reading these posts that if she called the FBI she was American. I could be way off base.

Just a hunch, that's all.


oh.  It would be pretty tough for her to provide an alibi for Deepak if she was in the US at the time.  Thats why I assumed she was an Aruban.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: KatzHome on June 29, 2006, 08:25:42 PM
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "Tylergal"


That is why I believe this happened at a motel/hotel or some place near the beach.  They may have gone to the VDS house but I just do not believe it happened there.  I think Paulus had found a room at a hotel/motel and it occurred somewhere near the HI, perhaps even the HI.  How do we know what those cameras showed or did not show ? If it showed them taking Natlaee there, you know the powers that be at HI, had that all deleted and redone by the time Beth arrived.  No way did they want their little house of horrors involved in this and thus, the nice gesture to let Beth stay so she would be less than wise to their goings-on.


I don't know.  I've never been of the belief that Paulus had any involvement deeper then helping to conceal the crime after the fact (and disposing of her body).  I just can't (for whatever reason) see him being directly involved with her rape and murder...


I almost completly agree with you there, Strike...

But ~ since we're not on the beach anymore ~ the most logical place for Natalee's death ~ at least to me ~ is the VDsloot compound.

And I think that Joran ran for Paulus while Natalee was dying ~ seeking his advice.

I think it was Paulus who decided that it was better for them to just let her die ~ to not take her for help.  That he would take care of getting rid of her body.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on June 29, 2006, 08:26:32 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"

She contacted the FBI because she lives in the United States. At least that is what I presume given the fact she called them first. :wink:


so she lives in the US but just happened to be in Aruba the night they killed Natalee??


Oh blah, i really don't know.

I just assumed reading these posts that if she called the FBI she was American. I could be way off base.

Just a hunch, that's all.


oh.  It would be pretty tough for her to provide an alibi for Deepak if she was in the US at the time.  Thats why I assumed she was an Aruban.


Yes, and i can see where you would go that way.
And i guess when i read FBI i just thought of USA.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on June 29, 2006, 08:26:40 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"

She contacted the FBI because she lives in the United States. At least that is what I presume given the fact she called them first. :wink:


so she lives in the US but just happened to be in Aruba the night they killed Natalee??


Oh blah, i really don't know.

I just assumed reading these posts that if she called the FBI she was American. I could be way off base.

Just a hunch, that's all.


oh.  It would be pretty tough for her to provide an alibi for Deepak if she was in the US at the time.  Thats why I assumed she was an Aruban.


Yeah, but I'd believe Deepak to be stupid enough to ask a woman who lives in another COUNTRY to provide an alibi for him... :roll:

And who said he couldn't be confused with a Rocket Scientist??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on June 29, 2006, 08:27:40 PM
From the Skeeter's tapes regarding the gardener and Deepaks call to a girl in the US:

Jamie Skeeters:  Right after the guy called that testified against you... the gardener. You made a call. Not
                             a telephone call, but you made a call to a girl and asked her to be your alibi.  That girl
                             went right to the FBI. She's scared that she's going to get mixed up and thrown in jail and
                             be arrested. And they recorded your voice on a (unintelligible) call.  They've got you
                             calling for an alibi.

Deepak Kalpoe:   But, I didn't call anyone.

Jamie Skeeters:  I heard your voice.  I mean, I saw the voice on the telephone call message.

Deepak Kalpoe:  And, where was the call number?

Jamie Skeeters:  I can find out.  But, anyway, that girl..they have... the  FBI has your. You did it, not
                            on the phone, but you did it... phone call through the internet.  Anyway...

Deepak Kalpoe:  It's just not possible, because I didn't.
                             (chuckles)
                            I didn't.

Jamie Skeeters: You may have called somebody, somehow, insinuating you wanted them... or they were
                            wearing a wire.  One or the other, I'm not sure how they did it.  But, I do know after that...
                            that guy testified, you allegedly.  I don't know the true story. You called this girl and said I'm
                            going to need you to help me with an alibi.  She... got scared... went to the Feds. The
                            justice system knows about it and I know you're going to get picked up. And they are
                            going to use that against you as your scared alibi.  It's not good for you, guy.  It's not good
                            at all what's happening.  They say that you were running scared and you called, saying
                            you need help or something. I can get the conversation; it's gonna take me a couple days.

Deepak Kalpoe:   Are parts anonymous?  Or all of  it or...?

Jamie Skeeters:  I don't know.  I just tell you what I found out from my source. That other... the mother knows, her
                            attorneys know, the justice know and the police know.  I got first (unintelligible) and this girl
                            here is tipping them.  Whatever, that family knows.  As a matter of fact, I may go do the
                            last kiss you know, and say "Hi  here's... here's, if I can help you, give me a call.," just
                            so I can see what they know. That's usually how I work on that side. If they a...  Anyhow.
                            It's a good friend of yours and she's scared for her well being.  So, if you go back and
                            threaten her, if it did happen, they will snap you up and (unintelligible).  So, because the feds
                            know and people know and they, they...

Deepak Kalpoe:   And who is this lady friend?

Jamie Skeeters:  I will find out  I will find out, for..

Deepak Kalpoe:   Because, it's not true.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on June 29, 2006, 08:29:32 PM
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"

She contacted the FBI because she lives in the United States. At least that is what I presume given the fact she called them first. :wink:


so she lives in the US but just happened to be in Aruba the night they killed Natalee??


Oh blah, i really don't know.

I just assumed reading these posts that if she called the FBI she was American. I could be way off base.

Just a hunch, that's all.


oh.  It would be pretty tough for her to provide an alibi for Deepak if she was in the US at the time.  Thats why I assumed she was an Aruban.


Yeah, but I'd believe Deepak to be stupid enough to ask a woman who lives in another COUNTRY to provide an alibi for him... :roll:

And who said he couldn't be confused with a Rocket Scientist??


That is an excellent point THird strike.
ANd riddle me this......I wonder where or how he came about to know this girl/woman if she did/does indeed live here in the US.

So many questions, so few answers.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: blah on June 29, 2006, 08:30:11 PM
Quote from: "thirdstrike"

Yeah, but I'd believe Deepak to be stupid enough to ask a woman who lives in another COUNTRY to provide an alibi for him... :roll:

And who said he couldn't be confused with a Rocket Scientist??


I dunno about rocket scientist, but I do believe Deepak is the smartest out of all of the pimp punks.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on June 29, 2006, 08:31:04 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "thirdstrike"

Yeah, but I'd believe Deepak to be stupid enough to ask a woman who lives in another COUNTRY to provide an alibi for him... :roll:

And who said he couldn't be confused with a Rocket Scientist??


I dunno about rocket scientist, but I do believe Deepak is the smartest out of all of the pimp punks.


My vote goes to Satish.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: KatzHome on June 29, 2006, 08:34:59 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
There is a tremendous difference in what Bush is talking about and what happened to Natalee.  These people were kidnapped by members of a FOREIGN GOVERNMENT.

Natalee was NOT kidnapped by PM Oduber nor some military agent in Aruba.  She is NOT being held in prison there.  She is not being held as a political prisoner. She is not being held to blackmail another government nor for prisoner exchange.   She was likely raped and murdered by three punks or thugs who are not even fully adults let alone representatives of their government.

No head of state in the entire world is going to get involved in what amounts to street crime nor should they.

Certainly not Bush for he is already in trouble for even trying to locate terrorists by their banking records.  If he had made one move to intervene in a case in another country like this, I am sure the cries for his impeachment would be deafening.

I do not understand why anybody would suggest that it is some how Bush's place to address a crime by a private citizen or group of them in another country.  And heaven help him if he did!  The liberals in this country won't allow him to protect us on U.S. soil let alone in a foreign country!   :evil:


I was kinda glad for that whole long post, though, Anna ~ I was 4 pages behind ~ and now, without hardly having to read anything ~ I'm only 3 pages behind...    :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on June 29, 2006, 08:36:12 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "thirdstrike"

Yeah, but I'd believe Deepak to be stupid enough to ask a woman who lives in another COUNTRY to provide an alibi for him... :roll:

And who said he couldn't be confused with a Rocket Scientist??


I dunno about rocket scientist, but I do believe Deepak is the smartest out of all of the pimp punks.


C'mon now.  Deepak is probably the dumbest (IMO)...with his brother a close second.  I believe Joran to be of much higher intelligence then the K2's.  That doesn't mean he hasn't made some VERY stupid moves along the way (the interviews one glarinf example).  But, I think he's most likely the most educated of them all.

I beliebe if it wasn't for his lawyer, Deepak would have sank himself LONG ago!  He would have taken that polygraph test (from J. Skeeters), and the rest would have been history.  It'd be VERY easy to get to Deepak if his lawyer wasn't around.  All it would take is $$$...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: blah on June 29, 2006, 08:37:39 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
From the Skeeter's tapes regarding the gardener and Deepaks call to a girl in the US:

Jamie Skeeters:  Right after the guy called that testified against you... the gardener. You made a call. Not
                             a telephone call, but you made a call to a girl and asked her to be your alibi.  That girl
                             went right to the FBI. She's scared that she's going to get mixed up and thrown in jail and
                             be arrested. And they recorded your voice on a (unintelligible) call.  They've got you
                             calling for an alibi.

Deepak Kalpoe:   But, I didn't call anyone.

Jamie Skeeters:  I heard your voice.  I mean, I saw the voice on the telephone call message.


<snip>




WOW klass thats great, thank you !!!!


this whole transcript tells me that Deepak contacted this girl through a method that he thought was untraceable. It must have been through the internet somehow.  He was shocked that they had that communiction with the girl.

Why would he say things like this if he didnt contact that girl?

Deepak Kalpoe: And, where was the call number?

Deepak Kalpoe: Are parts anonymous? Or all of it or...?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on June 29, 2006, 08:38:42 PM
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "thirdstrike"

Yeah, but I'd believe Deepak to be stupid enough to ask a woman who lives in another COUNTRY to provide an alibi for him... :roll:

And who said he couldn't be confused with a Rocket Scientist??


I dunno about rocket scientist, but I do believe Deepak is the smartest out of all of the pimp punks.


C'mon now.  Deepak is probably the dumbest (IMO)...with his brother a close second.  I believe Joran to be of much higher intelligence then the K2's.  That doesn't mean he hasn't made some VERY stupid moves along the way (the interviews one glarinf example).  But, I think he's most likely the most educated of them all.

I beliebe if it wasn't for his lawyer, Deepak would have sank himself LONG ago!  He would have taken that polygraph test (from J. Skeeters), and the rest would have been history.  It'd be VERY easy to get to Deepak if his lawyer wasn't around.  All it would take is $$$...


I would love to know what satish has to say... and why of all of them is he the one that never gets cornered... if I were him I would be ill for having to take the year again at school....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Shizaru on June 29, 2006, 08:38:45 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
.
Well, Deepak was upset about the gardener witness because he had the fit and threw the dominoes all over the room.  I don't think he would be upset if he was not seen.


And that just blows any time line I have ever had right out of the water, too.   :?


Deepak's behavior is very suspicious, but I still think the gardener's story is probably bogus.  Not to sound too CSI, but people lie, evidence doesn't.  And it's very hard to reconcile Deepak being at the pond at 2:30 with the computer and phone record evidence.  Not only is Deepak logging on at 2:00, but at 3:15 you have Joran sending him casual "I'm home" and "What's up" TMs, indicating that at that point Deepak did not know anything was wrong.  The only realistic way I see for the gardener's story to be true is if it was actually Satish in the car not Deepak.  But that doesn't seem likely to me, why would Deepak go home and let Joran and Satish have all the fun with Natalee. If Deepak was home at 2:00 than I think Satish probably was too.  

Based on electronic records and polis car tape I have come down to two scenarios:

1) 2K are innocent, Joran alone raped and murdered Natalee after 2K left him alone with her on beach  

2) Joran raped Natalee on beach, then after learning from Joran that he'd left her there, 2K came back and raped, murdered, and disposed of her without Joran's knowledge


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: blah on June 29, 2006, 08:41:04 PM
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "thirdstrike"

Yeah, but I'd believe Deepak to be stupid enough to ask a woman who lives in another COUNTRY to provide an alibi for him... :roll:

And who said he couldn't be confused with a Rocket Scientist??


I dunno about rocket scientist, but I do believe Deepak is the smartest out of all of the pimp punks.


C'mon now.  Deepak is probably the dumbest (IMO)...with his brother a close second.  I believe Joran to be of much higher intelligence then the K2's.  That doesn't mean he hasn't made some VERY stupid moves along the way (the interviews one glarinf example).  But, I think he's most likely the most educated of them all.

I beliebe if it wasn't for his lawyer, Deepak would have sank himself LONG ago!  He would have taken that polygraph test (from J. Skeeters), and the rest would have been history.  It'd be VERY easy to get to Deepak if his lawyer wasn't around.  All it would take is $$$...


Oh yeah, Joran is the smart one all right - running around doing interviews and running his mouth...... :roll:

Look at the way Deepak completely outwits Joran in the back of the police car


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on June 29, 2006, 08:41:35 PM
Quote from: "Shizaru"
Quote from: "Anna"
.
Well, Deepak was upset about the gardener witness because he had the fit and threw the dominoes all over the room.  I don't think he would be upset if he was not seen.


And that just blows any time line I have ever had right out of the water, too.   :?


Deepak's behavior is very suspicious, but I still think the gardener's story is probably bogus.  Not to sound too CSI, but people lie, evidence doesn't.  And it's very hard to reconcile Deepak being at the pond at 2:30 with the computer and phone record evidence.  Not only is Deepak logging on at 2:00, but at 3:15 you have Joran sending him casual "I'm home" and "What's up" TMs, indicating that at that point Deepak did not know anything was wrong.  The only realistic way I see for the gardener's story to be true is if it was actually Satish in the car not Deepak.  But that doesn't seem likely to me, why would Deepak go home and let Joran and Satish have all the fun with Natalee. If Deepak was home at 2:00 than I think Satish probably was too.  

Based on electronic records and polis car tape I have come down to two scenarios:

1) 2K are innocent, Joran alone raped and murdered Natalee after 2K left him alone with her on beach  

2) Joran raped Natalee on beach, then after learning from Joran that he'd left her there, 2K came back and raped, murdered, and disposed of her without Joran's knowledge


Ok that part has always struck me as odd... guys don't do that kind of thing... send TM's they are home... I think he was saying she's gone... or something to that effect and in words that could not be held against him... JMO


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: KatzHome on June 29, 2006, 08:42:33 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
JQK on Greta tonight...


I am sooooo  glad I just read this in time for Greta to begin ~ I'll record it...  I so much want to say "tape" it  :lol: 2 generations maybe for tape to stop meaning record...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on June 29, 2006, 08:44:07 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
[

Ok that part has always struck me as odd... guys don't do that kind of thing... send TM's they are home... I think he was saying she's gone... or something to that effect and in words that could not be held against him... JMO


i could not agree with you more!!!

The only way a guy may do that is if it is to a female, a girlfriend,wife or even just a friend.

But no way would guys do that.

Or should I say, it is unlikely.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Shizaru on June 29, 2006, 08:46:07 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "Shizaru"
Quote from: "Anna"
.
Well, Deepak was upset about the gardener witness because he had the fit and threw the dominoes all over the room.  I don't think he would be upset if he was not seen.


And that just blows any time line I have ever had right out of the water, too.   :?


Deepak's behavior is very suspicious, but I still think the gardener's story is probably bogus.  Not to sound too CSI, but people lie, evidence doesn't.  And it's very hard to reconcile Deepak being at the pond at 2:30 with the computer and phone record evidence.  Not only is Deepak logging on at 2:00, but at 3:15 you have Joran sending him casual "I'm home" and "What's up" TMs, indicating that at that point Deepak did not know anything was wrong.  The only realistic way I see for the gardener's story to be true is if it was actually Satish in the car not Deepak.  But that doesn't seem likely to me, why would Deepak go home and let Joran and Satish have all the fun with Natalee. If Deepak was home at 2:00 than I think Satish probably was too.  

Based on electronic records and polis car tape I have come down to two scenarios:

1) 2K are innocent, Joran alone raped and murdered Natalee after 2K left him alone with her on beach  

2) Joran raped Natalee on beach, then after learning from Joran that he'd left her there, 2K came back and raped, murdered, and disposed of her without Joran's knowledge


Ok that part has always struck me as odd... guys don't do that kind of thing... send TM's they are home... I think he was saying she's gone... or something to that effect and in words that could not be held against him... JMO


I agree it's odd, but my take on it is a little different.  I don't think it was some kind of code or anything like that.  I think possibly he was trying to act like nothing was wrong and trying a little too hard.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: sb on June 29, 2006, 08:48:49 PM
I have wondered a lot if the TMs were not some kind of pre-arranged code or shorthand, a way of telling Deepak that "It's done".

Whatever "it" is.

I STILL think there is just too much mystery in all this to be accounted for if it was just a simple case of murder or accident. There is some BIG, DARK, UGLY thing here that is being covered up that has ramifications beyond those of the murder of 1 girl.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on June 29, 2006, 08:49:11 PM
Quote from: "blah"


Oh yeah, Joran is the smart one all right - running around doing interviews and running his mouth...... :roll:

Look at the way Deepak completely outwits Joran in the back of the police car


I didn't say he was the "smart one" at all.  Rather, I said (IMO) that he was smarter then the others...that's it.  And, I clarified my statement to include the fact I believed him to be VERY stupid for doing the interviews.  So, take it for what it's worth...strictly my opinion...

As for Deepak outwitting Joran (or anyone, for that matter)...that dude couldn't outwit a rock!  All I heard in those tapes is attempts by both sides (Joran vs the K2's) to jab at each other.  It was like watching a fly keep bumping in to a mirror thinking it was open space.  It was useless and pathetic by both sides.  All we got out of it is the fact that ONE of them was lying...that's it!  If you call that "outwitting", then maybe you shouldn't put that application in to "Survivor" anytime soon...;)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on June 29, 2006, 08:49:26 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
[

Ok that part has always struck me as odd... guys don't do that kind of thing... send TM's they are home... I think he was saying she's gone... or something to that effect and in words that could not be held against him... JMO


i could not agree with you more!!!

The only way a guy may do that is if it is to a female, a girlfriend,wife or even just a friend.

But no way would guys do that.

Or should I say, it is unlikely.


it has always bugged me... but I admit I pick up on really strange stuff... and think/know there is something there... but I never get to what

just like the fact that in the CA interview Joran makes the point to say I called Deepak to pick me up at the beach but he didn't.... he interjects into questions that weren't even relavent to that fact.... and then licks his lips...("tasting the lie"... thanks Hat)... and I wonder... what is the significance of this???  that story then changes in his Greta interview... we all know he lies but what about this particular (stupid) point???


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: wreck on June 29, 2006, 08:49:33 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "thirdstrike"

Yeah, but I'd believe Deepak to be stupid enough to ask a woman who lives in another COUNTRY to provide an alibi for him... :roll:

And who said he couldn't be confused with a Rocket Scientist??


I dunno about rocket scientist, but I do believe Deepak is the smartest out of all of the pimp punks.


C'mon now.  Deepak is probably the dumbest (IMO)...with his brother a close second.  I believe Joran to be of much higher intelligence then the K2's.  That doesn't mean he hasn't made some VERY stupid moves along the way (the interviews one glarinf example).  But, I think he's most likely the most educated of them all.

I beliebe if it wasn't for his lawyer, Deepak would have sank himself LONG ago!  He would have taken that polygraph test (from J. Skeeters), and the rest would have been history.  It'd be VERY easy to get to Deepak if his lawyer wasn't around.  All it would take is $$$...


Oh yeah, Joran is the smart one all right - running around doing interviews and running his mouth...... :roll:

Look at the way Deepak completely outwits Joran in the back of the police car


 :D   :idea:   :wink:  I have to also put my money on Satish -- after all, he is 21 and still in Highschool. His mom says he is interested in becoming a Doctor. (you think we have a healthcare crisis.-!?!)  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on June 29, 2006, 08:50:44 PM
Quote from: "sb"
I have wondered a lot if the TMs were not some kind of pre-arranged code or shorthand, a way of telling Deepak that "It's done".

Whatever "it" is.

I STILL think there is just too much mystery in all this to be accounted for if it was just a simple case of murder or accident. There is some BIG, DARK, UGLY thing here that is being covered up that has ramifications beyond those of the murder of 1 girl.


exactly what I was thinking.... ok.. guys... would you at that age do that with your friends??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Shizaru on June 29, 2006, 08:50:48 PM
Quote from: "Shizaru"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "Shizaru"
Quote from: "Anna"
.
Well, Deepak was upset about the gardener witness because he had the fit and threw the dominoes all over the room.  I don't think he would be upset if he was not seen.


And that just blows any time line I have ever had right out of the water, too.   :?


Deepak's behavior is very suspicious, but I still think the gardener's story is probably bogus.  Not to sound too CSI, but people lie, evidence doesn't.  And it's very hard to reconcile Deepak being at the pond at 2:30 with the computer and phone record evidence.  Not only is Deepak logging on at 2:00, but at 3:15 you have Joran sending him casual "I'm home" and "What's up" TMs, indicating that at that point Deepak did not know anything was wrong.  The only realistic way I see for the gardener's story to be true is if it was actually Satish in the car not Deepak.  But that doesn't seem likely to me, why would Deepak go home and let Joran and Satish have all the fun with Natalee. If Deepak was home at 2:00 than I think Satish probably was too.  

Based on electronic records and polis car tape I have come down to two scenarios:

1) 2K are innocent, Joran alone raped and murdered Natalee after 2K left him alone with her on beach  

2) Joran raped Natalee on beach, then after learning from Joran that he'd left her there, 2K came back and raped, murdered, and disposed of her without Joran's knowledge


Ok that part has always struck me as odd... guys don't do that kind of thing... send TM's they are home... I think he was saying she's gone... or something to that effect and in words that could not be held against him... JMO


I agree it's odd, but my take on it is a little different.  I don't think it was some kind of code or anything like that.  I think possibly he was trying to act like nothing was wrong and trying a little too hard.


I should clarify, I think the person he was trying to fool with that act was Deepak.  I don't think it even occured to him the polis would ever be reading those TMs, because his "I'm home" TM contradicts his initial HI story.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on June 29, 2006, 08:51:09 PM
[quote="mrs. red
Or should I say, it is unlikely.[/quote]

it has always bugged me... but I admit I pick up on really strange stuff... and think/know there is something there... but I never get to what

just like the fact that in the CA interview Joran makes the point to say I called Deepak to pick me up at the beach but he didn't.... he interjects into questions that weren't even relavent to that fact.... and then licks his lips...("tasting the lie"... thanks Hat)... and I wonder... what is the significance of this???  that story then changes in his Greta interview... we all know he lies but what about this particular (stupid) point???[/quote]

Tasting the lie? Oh Hat, that is a good one, wherever you are.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: blah on June 29, 2006, 08:52:46 PM
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "blah"


Oh yeah, Joran is the smart one all right - running around doing interviews and running his mouth...... :roll:

Look at the way Deepak completely outwits Joran in the back of the police car


I didn't say he was the "smart one" at all.  Rather, I said (IMO) that he was smarter then the others...that's it.  And, I clarified my statement to include the fact I believed him to be VERY stupid for doing the interviews.  So, take it for what it's worth...strictly my opinion...

As for Deepak outwitting Joran (or anyone, for that matter)...that dude couldn't outwit a rock!  All I heard in those tapes is attempts by both sides (Joran vs the K2's) to jab at each other.  It was like watching a fly keep bumping in to a mirror thinking it was open space.  It was useless and pathetic by both sides.  All we got out of it is the fact that ONE of them was lying...that's it!  If you call that "outwitting", then maybe you shouldn't put that application in to "Survivor" anytime soon...;)


if thats all you got out of those transcripts than all 3 of them outwitted you (is that where the 3 strikes come from?) :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on June 29, 2006, 08:53:30 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
[quote="mrs. red
Or should I say, it is unlikely.


it has always bugged me... but I admit I pick up on really strange stuff... and think/know there is something there... but I never get to what

just like the fact that in the CA interview Joran makes the point to say I called Deepak to pick me up at the beach but he didn't.... he interjects into questions that weren't even relavent to that fact.... and then licks his lips...("tasting the lie"... thanks Hat)... and I wonder... what is the significance of this???  that story then changes in his Greta interview... we all know he lies but what about this particular (stupid) point???[/quote]

Tasting the lie? Oh Hat, that is a good one, wherever you are.[/quote]

Hat has told me that he lurks and reads w/o signing in sometimes... so maybe he's around.... but isn't that a perfect description of it??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on June 29, 2006, 08:54:06 PM
Quote from: "wreck"


 :D   :idea:   :wink:  I have to also put my money on Satish -- after all, he is 21 and still in Highschool. His mom says he is interested in becoming a Doctor. (you think we have a healthcare crisis.-!?!)  :wink:


That's a good point wreck!!  Satish is like the Aruban "Rerun"!  Remember him...from that show "What's Happening"?  Kept flunking so much, he was the only dude in High School with grey hair, and a hip replacement!!  By the time Satish gets his diploma, he'll be using a walker and be breathing through a ventilator...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on June 29, 2006, 08:54:15 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "blah"


Oh yeah, Joran is the smart one all right - running around doing interviews and running his mouth...... :roll:

Look at the way Deepak completely outwits Joran in the back of the police car


I didn't say he was the "smart one" at all.  Rather, I said (IMO) that he was smarter then the others...that's it.  And, I clarified my statement to include the fact I believed him to be VERY stupid for doing the interviews.  So, take it for what it's worth...strictly my opinion...

As for Deepak outwitting Joran (or anyone, for that matter)...that dude couldn't outwit a rock!  All I heard in those tapes is attempts by both sides (Joran vs the K2's) to jab at each other.  It was like watching a fly keep bumping in to a mirror thinking it was open space.  It was useless and pathetic by both sides.  All we got out of it is the fact that ONE of them was lying...that's it!  If you call that "outwitting", then maybe you shouldn't put that application in to "Survivor" anytime soon...;)


if thats all you got out of those transcripts than all 3 of them outwitted you (is that where the 3 strikes come from?) :)


OMG... y'all are kidding me aren't you???


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on June 29, 2006, 08:55:31 PM
Quote from: "blah"


if thats all you got out of those transcripts than all 3 of them outwitted you (is that where the 3 strikes come from?) :)


Oh, you got jokes, huh?  I guess I deserved it...;)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: blah on June 29, 2006, 08:56:44 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "blah"


Oh yeah, Joran is the smart one all right - running around doing interviews and running his mouth...... :roll:

Look at the way Deepak completely outwits Joran in the back of the police car


I didn't say he was the "smart one" at all.  Rather, I said (IMO) that he was smarter then the others...that's it.  And, I clarified my statement to include the fact I believed him to be VERY stupid for doing the interviews.  So, take it for what it's worth...strictly my opinion...

As for Deepak outwitting Joran (or anyone, for that matter)...that dude couldn't outwit a rock!  All I heard in those tapes is attempts by both sides (Joran vs the K2's) to jab at each other.  It was like watching a fly keep bumping in to a mirror thinking it was open space.  It was useless and pathetic by both sides.  All we got out of it is the fact that ONE of them was lying...that's it!  If you call that "outwitting", then maybe you shouldn't put that application in to "Survivor" anytime soon...;)


if thats all you got out of those transcripts than all 3 of them outwitted you (is that where the 3 strikes come from?) :)


OMG... y'all are kidding me aren't you???


Well if it makes you feel better, I think we all agree they are all dumb as a box of rocks, just areguing about the 3 iq points that seperates that 3 of them.  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on June 29, 2006, 08:56:58 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"


OMG... y'all are kidding me aren't you???


Kid with you??  No way!!  Mamma Strike didn't raise no dummies... :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on June 29, 2006, 08:57:25 PM
Hat if you are out there:

I'm stealing your line!    :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on June 29, 2006, 08:58:33 PM
Quote from: "blah"


Well if it makes you feel better, I think we all agree they are all dumb as a box of rocks, just areguing about the 3 iq points that seperates that 3 of them.  :lol:


That's my point blah!  If two of them had an IQ id 12, and the third one had an IQ of 14, wouldn't the one with 14 be smarter?  But, in comparison, they're ALL dumb!  That's what I was initially trying to say...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: blah on June 29, 2006, 08:58:34 PM
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "blah"


if thats all you got out of those transcripts than all 3 of them outwitted you (is that where the 3 strikes come from?) :)


Oh, you got jokes, huh?  I guess I deserved it...;)



just playin   :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: sb on June 29, 2006, 08:58:59 PM
mrs. red, guys WOULDN'T do that.

ESPECIALLY not guys who don't even care or worry about letting their parents know their whereabouts... or even have no problem sneaking out after midnight.

The ONLY way Joran does that is if Deepak needs that info as part of some pre-arranged agenda. Joran couldn't care less where Deepak was, nor Deepak care less where Joran was- there is not a shred of loyalty or humanity between two guys like that in the least.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on June 29, 2006, 08:59:29 PM
No need for a rousing rendition of kumbaya here.

Third and Blah just playin :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on June 29, 2006, 09:00:14 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Hat if you are out there:

I'm stealing your line!    :wink:


O/T....... Jaq... Glavine looks terrible... and you know as a (former) Braves fan.(don't live in ATL anymore... root for the home team and all).. I never forgave him.... :oops:  that was like Damon going to the NYY....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on June 29, 2006, 09:01:03 PM
Quote from: "sb"
mrs. red, guys WOULDN'T do that.

ESPECIALLY not guys who don't even care or worry about letting their parents know their whereabouts... or even have no problem sneaking out after midnight.

The ONLY way Joran does that is if Deepak needs that info as part of some pre-arranged agenda. Joran couldn't care less where Deepak was, nor Deepak care less where Joran was- there is not a shred of loyalty or humanity between two guys like that in the least.


The thing that bothers me about those two (Deepak and Joran) is the fact that by all accounts, they weren't very close friends.  Sure, they hung out.  But, not close enough to spend time in jail for...even for an hour!  That's why, I DO believe all 3 had some level of involvement.  The real question is, who's in deeper?  My $$ is on Joran...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on June 29, 2006, 09:01:14 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Hat if you are out there:

I'm stealing your line!    :wink:


O/T....... Jaq... Glavine looks terrible... and you know as a (former) Braves fan.(don't live in ATL anymore... root for the home team and all).. I never forgave him.... :oops:  that was like Damon going to the NYY....


Understood Mrs.  i get ya.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: blah on June 29, 2006, 09:01:38 PM
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "blah"


Well if it makes you feel better, I think we all agree they are all dumb as a box of rocks, just areguing about the 3 iq points that seperates that 3 of them.  :lol:


That's my point blah!  If two of them had an IQ id 12, and the third one had an IQ of 14, wouldn't the one with 14 be smarter?  But, in comparison, they're ALL dumb!  That's what I was initially trying to say...


oh yeah, I totally agree.  But if you lined all 3 of them up on the side of the road and had a dipshit contest, Joran would win hands down !!






LOL  ok i'll stop now.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on June 29, 2006, 09:01:40 PM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Since I have already entered Intersanctum, I just want to say, that I can see it from Shiz's viewpoint and from that of going to Joran's house.  Personally I do not think that what happened, happened at the house but see I am not as smart as the rest of you.  I am just thinking that a girl on vacation who thinks this stooge is an exchange student from Holland is not going to go to his house.  She wants to have romance somewhere near a beach, if it is consensual, not where the VDS live.  Maybe it is not substandard by their standards, but if Natalee saw that house thinking they were a family of large means, she might have had a heart attack just thinking what a mess she had gotten her house into, believing they lived in a "big house."


Those are good points, TG.  I forgot about the exchange student scam he was running.  I can't see the boys pulling this off 20 times if they made a habit of heading for the beach.  Maybe.  I don't know.  It's so hard to keep the lies straight.


I don't think it was at his house. I think they went to the house to get Freddy. I also think that the intent was to rape.
Do you think a beach is not romantic enough ?
Sand in your pants ?
Think young guys and quickies.
This wasn't about Joran or anyone else being attracted to Natalee.
It was about control, sex and humiliation.
Foreplay is a shot of 151 rum. With or without drugs.
Get what you want, dump them. It's the last night in Aruba for the girl.
When a rape is the intent the less info the girl has about you the better.
Deepak had his car in the back of C & C's.
Deepak, Satish and Joran did not hang out together in C & C's.
If someone had not seen Natalee in the car after leaving, who would be the wiser ?  
The lie would have stuck. I don't know who Natalee is says Joran.
Jug called him out on that one right on the spot.  
They did " this " 20 x before.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on June 29, 2006, 09:02:23 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
No need for a rousing rendition of kumbaya here.

Third and Blah just playin :lol:


But, can you sing just the first line of it Jacque?  I'd love to hear you sing...;)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Windsor on June 29, 2006, 09:02:29 PM
HI EVERYONE -- klaas -- look at my new nickname!!  I'm not GretaRocks anymore!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: blah on June 29, 2006, 09:03:38 PM
Quote from: "sb"
mrs. red, guys WOULDN'T do that.

ESPECIALLY not guys who don't even care or worry about letting their parents know their whereabouts... or even have no problem sneaking out after midnight.

The ONLY way Joran does that is if Deepak needs that info as part of some pre-arranged agenda. Joran couldn't care less where Deepak was, nor Deepak care less where Joran was- there is not a shred of loyalty or humanity between two guys like that in the least.


This is the way i see it too.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on June 29, 2006, 09:03:41 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "blah"


Well if it makes you feel better, I think we all agree they are all dumb as a box of rocks, just areguing about the 3 iq points that seperates that 3 of them.  :lol:


That's my point blah!  If two of them had an IQ id 12, and the third one had an IQ of 14, wouldn't the one with 14 be smarter?  But, in comparison, they're ALL dumb!  That's what I was initially trying to say...


oh yeah, I totally agree.  But if you lined all 3 of them up on the side of the road and had a dipshit contest, Joran would win hands down !!






LOL  ok i'll stop now.


I think it'd have to go in to OVERTIME to decide that one... :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on June 29, 2006, 09:04:19 PM
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Blah - to let you know how long it's been, the last time I communicated with her was when we still had the PM feature.  I will tell you that she did not live in Aruba but the US.


Was she a Super Hero?
:lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on June 29, 2006, 09:04:36 PM
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
No need for a rousing rendition of kumbaya here.

Third and Blah just playin :lol:


But, can you sing just the first line of it Jacque?  I'd love to hear you sing...;)



Mi mi mi.....

I knew a girl named niki, i guess you could say she was a sex...oops wrong song :oops:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on June 29, 2006, 09:04:59 PM
Quote from: "Windsor"
HI EVERYONE -- klaas -- look at my new nickname!!  I'm not GretaRocks anymore!!


Hey everyone!!  It's Windor - formerly Gretarocks!! :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Windsor on June 29, 2006, 09:05:20 PM
can someone go back to Melody letting' the cat out of the bag that Freddy was? or the Sloots that night?

why couldn't it have been Freddy on the internet at 3am?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on June 29, 2006, 09:05:49 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Hat if you are out there:

I'm stealing your line!    :wink:


O/T....... Jaq... Glavine looks terrible... and you know as a (former) Braves fan.(don't live in ATL anymore... root for the home team and all).. I never forgave him.... :oops:  that was like Damon going to the NYY....


Understood Mrs.  i get ya.


just watching with my sistah... and rootin for the other team.. :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on June 29, 2006, 09:06:11 PM
Quote from: "Windsor"
can someone go back to Melody letting' the cat out of the bag that Freddy was? or the Sloots that night?

why couldn't it have been Freddy on the internet at 3am?

Yeah, why not?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on June 29, 2006, 09:06:12 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "thirdstrike"

Yeah, but I'd believe Deepak to be stupid enough to ask a woman who lives in another COUNTRY to provide an alibi for him... :roll:

And who said he couldn't be confused with a Rocket Scientist??


I dunno about rocket scientist, but I do believe Deepak is the smartest out of all of the pimp punks.
 Yep.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: sb on June 29, 2006, 09:06:16 PM
If the guys are not "close" friends, why in the world would Joran even HAVE Deepak's contact info? Joran obviously had communicated w/Deepak before. They were NOT just 2 ships passing in the night.

They had to have had some kind of agenda that night... at least along the lines of the Stefy-Mill routine, if not more involved than that.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on June 29, 2006, 09:06:22 PM
Quote from: "Windsor"
HI EVERYONE -- klaas -- look at my new nickname!!  I'm not GretaRocks anymore!!


You need to fine tune that....

Windsor Rocks! :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Windsor on June 29, 2006, 09:07:03 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Windsor"
HI EVERYONE -- klaas -- look at my new nickname!!  I'm not GretaRocks anymore!!


Hey everyone!!  It's Windor - formerly Gretarocks!! :lol:  :lol:


wow, that taught me a lesson; things can quickly change


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: blah on June 29, 2006, 09:07:07 PM
Quote from: "Windsor"
can someone go back to Melody letting' the cat out of the bag that Freddy was? or the Sloots that night?

why couldn't it have been Freddy on the internet at 3am?


could have been Paulus too


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on June 29, 2006, 09:07:58 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
No need for a rousing rendition of kumbaya here.

Third and Blah just playin :lol:


But, can you sing just the first line of it Jacque?  I'd love to hear you sing...;)



Mi mi mi.....

I knew a girl named niki, i guess you could say she was a sex...oops wrong song :oops:


In the immortal words of Borat (of Ali G fame)...

"I Like"!!  

Wait, that's the song about the girl who likes to read magazines in a hotel lobby, right?   :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on June 29, 2006, 09:08:16 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "sb"
mrs. red, guys WOULDN'T do that.

ESPECIALLY not guys who don't even care or worry about letting their parents know their whereabouts... or even have no problem sneaking out after midnight.

The ONLY way Joran does that is if Deepak needs that info as part of some pre-arranged agenda. Joran couldn't care less where Deepak was, nor Deepak care less where Joran was- there is not a shred of loyalty or humanity between two guys like that in the least.


This is the way i see it too.


and that is why the stupid littlest pieces bother me...  and if you take the small little utterances, we did this 20x... you know that all 3 are involved... and I think SCroes, Freddy, GW... all have some involvement...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Windsor on June 29, 2006, 09:08:28 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "Windsor"
HI EVERYONE -- klaas -- look at my new nickname!!  I'm not GretaRocks anymore!!


You need to fine tune that....

Windsor Rocks! :lol:


lol; I'm just happy to be Windsor right now; shewwww   :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on June 29, 2006, 09:08:31 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "Shizaru"
Quote from: "Anna"
.
Well, Deepak was upset about the gardener witness because he had the fit and threw the dominoes all over the room.  I don't think he would be upset if he was not seen.


And that just blows any time line I have ever had right out of the water, too.   :?


Deepak's behavior is very suspicious, but I still think the gardener's story is probably bogus.  Not to sound too CSI, but people lie, evidence doesn't.  And it's very hard to reconcile Deepak being at the pond at 2:30 with the computer and phone record evidence.  Not only is Deepak logging on at 2:00, but at 3:15 you have Joran sending him casual "I'm home" and "What's up" TMs, indicating that at that point Deepak did not know anything was wrong.  The only realistic way I see for the gardener's story to be true is if it was actually Satish in the car not Deepak.  But that doesn't seem likely to me, why would Deepak go home and let Joran and Satish have all the fun with Natalee. If Deepak was home at 2:00 than I think Satish probably was too.  

Based on electronic records and polis car tape I have come down to two scenarios:

1) 2K are innocent, Joran alone raped and murdered Natalee after 2K left him alone with her on beach  

2) Joran raped Natalee on beach, then after learning from Joran that he'd left her there, 2K came back and raped, murdered, and disposed of her without Joran's knowledge


Ok that part has always struck me as odd... guys don't do that kind of thing... send TM's they are home... I think he was saying she's gone... or something to that effect and in words that could not be held against him... JMO

Satish could have been the one at home at the Kalpoes.
Deepak uses Joran's phone.
It is just the phone that can be placed and the computer at the Kalpoes.
Satish is the one who has school the next day. Deepak starts work late.
Don't know what Freddy does.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: sb on June 29, 2006, 09:09:02 PM
klaasend, BTW, is there any word on when we can get our avatars back? They make it much easier to find each other's posts.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on June 29, 2006, 09:09:15 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "thirdstrike"

Yeah, but I'd believe Deepak to be stupid enough to ask a woman who lives in another COUNTRY to provide an alibi for him... :roll:

And who said he couldn't be confused with a Rocket Scientist??


I dunno about rocket scientist, but I do believe Deepak is the smartest out of all of the pimp punks.
 Yep.


Like I said before...his lawyer surely is!  But, not him...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on June 29, 2006, 09:09:47 PM
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
No need for a rousing rendition of kumbaya here.

Third and Blah just playin :lol:


But, can you sing just the first line of it Jacque?  I'd love to hear you sing...;)



Mi mi mi.....

I knew a girl named niki, i guess you could say she was a sex...oops wrong song :oops:


In the immortal words of Borat (of Ali G fame)...

"I Like"!!  

Wait, that's the song about the girl who likes to read magazines in a hotel lobby, right?   :wink:


I love Ali G.

Ah yes , that is one in the same.

Call her up whenever you want to - - - -! :lol:

Only Prince !  What a wordsmith. :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Windsor on June 29, 2006, 09:09:48 PM
but again, please explain to me the comment about Melanie/Melody (sorry about her name); what did she say? how did it come about?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on June 29, 2006, 09:10:52 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"


Only Prince !  What a wordsmith. :lol:


Man's a GENUIS!!  What else can be said???


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on June 29, 2006, 09:11:40 PM
Quote from: "sb"
If the guys are not "close" friends, why in the world would Joran even HAVE Deepak's contact info? Joran obviously had communicated w/Deepak before. They were NOT just 2 ships passing in the night.

They had to have had some kind of agenda that night... at least along the lines of the Stefy-Mill routine, if not more involved than that.


Yes there are inconsistancies about that too.... and let's face it... there seems to be shall we say a little racism among the Dutch on the island... (I say this because they tried to pin this on MJ and Abraham) how would these two have crossed paths??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on June 29, 2006, 09:12:30 PM
Quote from: "Windsor"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Windsor"
HI EVERYONE -- klaas -- look at my new nickname!!  I'm not GretaRocks anymore!!


Hey everyone!!  It's Windor - formerly Gretarocks!! :lol:  :lol:


wow, that taught me a lesson; things can quickly change

In a NY minute... good to see you GR/W... can I call you that :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on June 29, 2006, 09:12:50 PM
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"


Only Prince !  What a wordsmith. :lol:


Man's a GENUIS!!  What else can be said???


Amen.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: blah on June 29, 2006, 09:12:54 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "sb"
mrs. red, guys WOULDN'T do that.

ESPECIALLY not guys who don't even care or worry about letting their parents know their whereabouts... or even have no problem sneaking out after midnight.

The ONLY way Joran does that is if Deepak needs that info as part of some pre-arranged agenda. Joran couldn't care less where Deepak was, nor Deepak care less where Joran was- there is not a shred of loyalty or humanity between two guys like that in the least.


This is the way i see it too.


and that is why the stupid littlest pieces bother me...  and if you take the small little utterances, we did this 20x... you know that all 3 are involved... and I think SCroes, Freddy, GW... all have some involvement...


yeah i'm the same way with the stupid little pieces.  

I was reading Jorans interviews earlier tonight (the chris coumo one and and some other one) and man, is it full of these little things.  I mean every response to every question was just a blatent lie.

I had to quit reading because it was just getting me too wound up.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Windsor on June 29, 2006, 09:13:19 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "Windsor"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Windsor"
HI EVERYONE -- klaas -- look at my new nickname!!  I'm not GretaRocks anymore!!


Hey everyone!!  It's Windor - formerly Gretarocks!! :lol:  :lol:


wow, that taught me a lesson; things can quickly change

In a NY minute... good to see you GR/W... can I call you that :lol:


yep, I guess that can be our lil secret; haha


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on June 29, 2006, 09:13:52 PM
Quote from: "sb"
klaasend, BTW, is there any word on when we can get our avatars back? They make it much easier to find each other's posts.


That is a question for Tom, sorry I have no idea.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on June 29, 2006, 09:14:20 PM
Quote from: "sb"
klaasend, BTW, is there any word on when we can get our avatars back? They make it much easier to find each other's posts.


Not Klaasend, but I can tell you that they are working on it... A lot... and I miss our avatars too


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on June 29, 2006, 09:15:37 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "sb"
klaasend, BTW, is there any word on when we can get our avatars back? They make it much easier to find each other's posts.


Not Klaasend, but I can tell you that they are working on it... A lot... and I miss our avatars too


If when they come back, I make my avatar a little red x, will you know it's me? :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: sb on June 29, 2006, 09:16:05 PM
Quote from: "blah"


yeah i'm the same way with the stupid little pieces.  

I was reading Jorans interviews earlier tonight (the chris coumo one and and some other one) and man, is it full of these little things.  I mean every response to every question was just a blatant lie.

I had to quit reading because it was just getting me too wound up.


People do that when they are just making it up as they go.

And when they are having to cover one set of lies with a new set.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on June 29, 2006, 09:16:45 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "sb"
klaasend, BTW, is there any word on when we can get our avatars back? They make it much easier to find each other's posts.


Not Klaasend, but I can tell you that they are working on it... A lot... and I miss our avatars too


There..is this better??  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on June 29, 2006, 09:17:20 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "sb"
klaasend, BTW, is there any word on when we can get our avatars back? They make it much easier to find each other's posts.


Not Klaasend, but I can tell you that they are working on it... A lot... and I miss our avatars too


If when they come back, I make my avatar a little red x, will you know it's me? :roll:


I can always find my sistah silly!  LOL...

now y'all have that song playing in my head...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Shizaru on June 29, 2006, 09:18:04 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "Shizaru"
Quote from: "Anna"
.
Well, Deepak was upset about the gardener witness because he had the fit and threw the dominoes all over the room.  I don't think he would be upset if he was not seen.


And that just blows any time line I have ever had right out of the water, too.   :?


Deepak's behavior is very suspicious, but I still think the gardener's story is probably bogus.  Not to sound too CSI, but people lie, evidence doesn't.  And it's very hard to reconcile Deepak being at the pond at 2:30 with the computer and phone record evidence.  Not only is Deepak logging on at 2:00, but at 3:15 you have Joran sending him casual "I'm home" and "What's up" TMs, indicating that at that point Deepak did not know anything was wrong.  The only realistic way I see for the gardener's story to be true is if it was actually Satish in the car not Deepak.  But that doesn't seem likely to me, why would Deepak go home and let Joran and Satish have all the fun with Natalee. If Deepak was home at 2:00 than I think Satish probably was too.  

Based on electronic records and polis car tape I have come down to two scenarios:

1) 2K are innocent, Joran alone raped and murdered Natalee after 2K left him alone with her on beach  

2) Joran raped Natalee on beach, then after learning from Joran that he'd left her there, 2K came back and raped, murdered, and disposed of her without Joran's knowledge


Ok that part has always struck me as odd... guys don't do that kind of thing... send TM's they are home... I think he was saying she's gone... or something to that effect and in words that could not be held against him... JMO

Satish could have been the one at home at the Kalpoes.


Theoretically yes.  But not realistically.  It's not plausable that Satish would be online talking to Deepak's friends pretending to be Deepak, and then on top of that, after going thru so much trouble to set up a computer alibi for himself, Deepak contradicts his own alibi in his first statement. when he tells polis he didn't get home and log on until 2:40.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on June 29, 2006, 09:18:07 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "sb"
klaasend, BTW, is there any word on when we can get our avatars back? They make it much easier to find each other's posts.


Not Klaasend, but I can tell you that they are working on it... A lot... and I miss our avatars too


If when they come back, I make my avatar a little red x, will you know it's me? :roll:


I can always find my sistah silly!  LOL...

now y'all have that song playing in my head...


Catchy little diddy! :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on June 29, 2006, 09:19:02 PM
Quote from: "sb"
Quote from: "blah"


yeah i'm the same way with the stupid little pieces.  

I was reading Jorans interviews earlier tonight (the chris coumo one and and some other one) and man, is it full of these little things.  I mean every response to every question was just a blatant lie.

I had to quit reading because it was just getting me too wound up.


People do that when they are just making it up as they go.

And when they are having to cover one set of lies with a new set.

I still say that if you take all the interviews... and put them together and pick out those little slips... i.e. we drove by my house, I called deepak and he said no... and then the next interview... sharks, shoes, etc... we could get to some truths that are told unintentionally...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: blah on June 29, 2006, 09:19:50 PM
Quote from: "sb"
Quote from: "blah"


yeah i'm the same way with the stupid little pieces.  

I was reading Jorans interviews earlier tonight (the chris coumo one and and some other one) and man, is it full of these little things.  I mean every response to every question was just a blatant lie.

I had to quit reading because it was just getting me too wound up.


People do that when they are just making it up as they go.

And when they are having to cover one set of lies with a new set.


yeah, and it was just killing me that the interviewers were treating him with kid gloves.  So many opportunities to nail his sorry ass and they just them slip by.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: sb on June 29, 2006, 09:20:55 PM
Heading out for a while. See y'all later tonight.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Windsor on June 29, 2006, 09:22:40 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
I still say that if you take all the interviews... and put them together and pick out those little slips... i.e. we drove by my house, I called deepak and he said no... and then the next interview... sharks, shoes, etc... we could get to some truths that are told unintentionally...


I totally agree with you, Mrs Red; and the more Joran talked/lied, the more it says that he was confronted with certain evidence, such as stopping by his house (because he found out someone saw them on the road, ArubaGirl's friend or family member)

but if that's true, then why did he say they were at the Marriott beach area, or the fishermen's hut area -- was that when they broke into it?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on June 29, 2006, 09:24:43 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "Shizaru"
Quote from: "Anna"
.
Well, Deepak was upset about the gardener witness because he had the fit and threw the dominoes all over the room.  I don't think he would be upset if he was not seen.


And that just blows any time line I have ever had right out of the water, too.   :?


Deepak's behavior is very suspicious, but I still think the gardener's story is probably bogus.  Not to sound too CSI, but people lie, evidence doesn't.  And it's very hard to reconcile Deepak being at the pond at 2:30 with the computer and phone record evidence.  Not only is Deepak logging on at 2:00, but at 3:15 you have Joran sending him casual "I'm home" and "What's up" TMs, indicating that at that point Deepak did not know anything was wrong.  The only realistic way I see for the gardener's story to be true is if it was actually Satish in the car not Deepak.  But that doesn't seem likely to me, why would Deepak go home and let Joran and Satish have all the fun with Natalee. If Deepak was home at 2:00 than I think Satish probably was too.  

Based on electronic records and polis car tape I have come down to two scenarios:

1) 2K are innocent, Joran alone raped and murdered Natalee after 2K left him alone with her on beach  

2) Joran raped Natalee on beach, then after learning from Joran that he'd left her there, 2K came back and raped, murdered, and disposed of her without Joran's knowledge


Ok that part has always struck me as odd... guys don't do that kind of thing... send TM's they are home... I think he was saying she's gone... or something to that effect and in words that could not be held against him... JMO

Satish could have been the one at home at the Kalpoes.
Deepak uses Joran's phone.
It is just the phone that can be placed and the computer at the Kalpoes.
Satish is the one who has school the next day. Deepak starts work late.
Don't know what Freddy does.


ps...

The girls Natalee was with in the Casino, they thought Joran was an exchange student from Holland. They was no overt contact between Joran and Natalee in the casino or at C & C's.
No one " saw "  Natalee get in the car.
The reason they were on to Joran so quick is because Beth looked at the videos in the casino within 24 hours.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Windsor on June 29, 2006, 09:28:32 PM
and could Paulus' comment that he picked "them' up at 4am be Freddy?

I'm very suspicious of Freddy


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on June 29, 2006, 09:29:30 PM
was the exchange student from Holland on vacation part of the we did this 20x?  was going to CnC's 30 minutes before closing time part of the 20x.... a shot of 151 laced with ghb?   tourist girls that got raped and were too ashamed to come forward...and left and prayed no one was the wiser?

I mean... he didn't talk to Natalee in the Casino... and in 30 minutes she goes from dancing with her friend(s) to waving him over, doing belly shots, 151 and finds him so fascinating she wants to leave with him after 30 minutes????? this happened 20x??  then the whole scummy thing starts at CnC's.... IMO


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: San on June 29, 2006, 09:35:47 PM
Quote from: "Windsor"
and could Paulus' comment that he picked "them' up at 4am be Freddy?

I'm very suspicious of Freddy

I'm convinced that Freddy is 100% involved.  Deepak sealed the deal when he said on tape that Freddy needs to tell the truth.  The truth about what?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Dihannah1 on June 29, 2006, 09:36:39 PM
Sorry if it's been mentioned, I haven't read tonight yet.  But Greta just said a new arrest in Aruba?  coming up soon.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Windsor on June 29, 2006, 09:37:22 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Windsor"
and could Paulus' comment that he picked "them' up at 4am be Freddy?

I'm very suspicious of Freddy

I'm convinced that Freddy is 100% involved.  Deepak sealed the deal when he said on tape that Freddy needs to tell the truth.  The truth about what?


oh, that's right, San; I had forgotten that; I was just going with my gut that Freddy is involved

and what about Deepak saying "your own father"

to me, that screams involvement before the fact, not just cover up


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Windsor on June 29, 2006, 09:38:24 PM
Quote from: "Dihannah1"
Sorry if it's been mentioned, I haven't read tonight yet.  But Greta just said a new arrest in Aruba?  coming up soon.


prolly Jossy; did you read SurfGirl's post on PFN?  sounds like JR to me


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Dihannah1 on June 29, 2006, 09:38:35 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "sb"
klaasend, BTW, is there any word on when we can get our avatars back? They make it much easier to find each other's posts.


Not Klaasend, but I can tell you that they are working on it... A lot... and I miss our avatars too


God Love 'em for all the hard work they do.  It's a shame it's happened so much recently..  Any thoughts of looking into another hosting company?  With better contingency?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Dihannah1 on June 29, 2006, 09:39:57 PM
Quote from: "Windsor"
Quote from: "Dihannah1"
Sorry if it's been mentioned, I haven't read tonight yet.  But Greta just said a new arrest in Aruba?  coming up soon.


prolly Jossy; did you read SurfGirl's post on PFN?  sounds like JR to me


I haven't had a chance to read anything, I was just signing on at the same time I was listening to Hannity and Colmes.  Greta came on to say what was coming up on her show.  "New arrest in Aruba".....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on June 29, 2006, 09:40:57 PM
Quote from: "Dihannah1"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "sb"
klaasend, BTW, is there any word on when we can get our avatars back? They make it much easier to find each other's posts.


Not Klaasend, but I can tell you that they are working on it... A lot... and I miss our avatars too


God Love 'em for all the hard work they do.  It's a shame it's happened so much recently..  Any thoughts of looking into another hosting company?  With better contingency?


I have to be honest... when the site crashes, I don't ask too many questions... they get testy with me...  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: terryd270 on June 29, 2006, 09:41:23 PM
The root of everything is Joran, if Joran wasn't there that night we wouldn't be here talking about Natalee..  There were others but Joran is the root and I believe the crime happen at the house.. He isn't scared of his parents or and he is the head of the snake..

I'm curious on what JQK will have to say tonight and my only fear is that Greta will have Julia on too.. There goes my dinner...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on June 29, 2006, 09:43:18 PM
Quote from: "terryd270"
The root of everything is Joran, if Joran wasn't there that night we wouldn't be here talking about Natalee..  There were others but Joran is the root and I believe the crime happen at the house.. He isn't scared of his parents or and he is the head of the snake..

I'm curious on what JQK will have to say tonight and my only fear is that Greta will have Julia on too.. There goes my dinner...


I want to hear more about the poster from BFN that is saying Jossy????  did i hear that right??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Windsor on June 29, 2006, 09:43:50 PM
well, good night, all; gonna get ready to watch Greta

formerly known as GretaRocks

now Windsor

 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Windsor on June 29, 2006, 09:44:33 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "terryd270"
The root of everything is Joran, if Joran wasn't there that night we wouldn't be here talking about Natalee..  There were others but Joran is the root and I believe the crime happen at the house.. He isn't scared of his parents or and he is the head of the snake..

I'm curious on what JQK will have to say tonight and my only fear is that Greta will have Julia on too.. There goes my dinner...


I want to hear more about the poster from BFN that is saying Jossy????  did i hear that right??


Mrs Red, that's how rumors get started; lemme see if I can find the post


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on June 29, 2006, 09:44:54 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "terryd270"
The root of everything is Joran, if Joran wasn't there that night we wouldn't be here talking about Natalee..  There were others but Joran is the root and I believe the crime happen at the house.. He isn't scared of his parents or and he is the head of the snake..

I'm curious on what JQK will have to say tonight and my only fear is that Greta will have Julia on too.. There goes my dinner...


I want to hear more about the poster from BFN that is saying Jossy????  did i hear that right??


ok after i hit submit and < < 2x... I didn't read that right the first time...  :oops:  :oops:  nevermind...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on June 29, 2006, 09:45:28 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"


I don't think it was at his house. I think they went to the house to get Freddy. I also think that the intent was to rape.


I think this is what down:
Alana sees Natalee and Joran is walking behing her, not with her.
Deepak circles CnC's 3 times trying to wait out the taxi crowd so they aren't seen with Natalee.  

They drop Satish at home who signs on the internet.

They go to Joran's apartment and get Freddy. They drive to the lighthouse as they wait for the drugs to kick in. Natalee was verbal in the car leaving CnC's and the drugs needed time to work.  But something goes wrong, maybe Natalee is getting sick inthe car.

They drive to the pond to to wash the vomit  away and they are spotted by the Gardener.

They cook up a plan for an alibi, and then drive to the vdS home.  They decide to take Natalee into Joran's apt where they leave her alone for a few minutes.  Joran & Freddie walk Deepak back to the car where they talk about the plan some more.  Joran heading back to the apt catches Natalee on the phone, and starts beating her in a fit of rage and rapes her.  Somehow, he fatally injures her. Maybe he struck her and she fell against something, like a corner of a piece of furniture, injuring her head.  

Joran gets Daddy involved, but Natalee is fatally injured.  She is not given any emergency care and dies. Paulus makes the plans for the disposal of the body. He pays someone to dispose of the body, but they dump her at the rocks instead.

She is found by ALE, and disposed of again.

I think this time she went into the crypts in the cemetary.

In January,  some crypts are destroyed to cover up the breaking into the crypt was Natalee was placed.  Aruba plans to bury her in the dunes and then have the FBI cadaver dogs find her.  But the FBI foils that plan when they refuse to send the dogs b/c ALE won't disclose the source of the mysterious tip.

What they've done with the body now is anyone's guess.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: terryd270 on June 29, 2006, 09:46:04 PM
Winsor what did you do with our GretaRocks?  Give her back... :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Dihannah1 on June 29, 2006, 09:46:39 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "Dihannah1"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "sb"
klaasend, BTW, is there any word on when we can get our avatars back? They make it much easier to find each other's posts.


Not Klaasend, but I can tell you that they are working on it... A lot... and I miss our avatars too


God Love 'em for all the hard work they do.  It's a shame it's happened so much recently..  Any thoughts of looking into another hosting company?  With better contingency?


I have to be honest... when the site crashes, I don't ask too many questions... they get testy with me...  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


I completely relate, because that is what I do for a living.  It's a complete bummer!  So they have my sympathy!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Windsor on June 29, 2006, 09:47:26 PM
Mrs Red -- below is what SurfChic wrote on PFN; she had only posted two times at this point; that's why I thought it might be JR.  I don't know how to quote, but it's on page 24 of "Carlos the Colombian" thread:

Most everyone here in aruba knew Carlos was lying!!! He was after the reward money. He's got a long record of drug arrests, like the crackhead from the landfill that Jossy believed. He'll be deported after he does his time for his latest offense. They knew he was lying almost immediately because he said he called his wife and it was checked out and it never happened. His story was always changing and was just too sensational to ever be believed. Jacobs and Adolpho called him "Mansur's MANURE!!!" in reference to all the lying witnesses that Jossy creates, intimidates or fabricates. No one here believes anything or anyone remotely tied to Jossy anymore. He's become the butt of jokes at the local comedy clubs as well. Certain lawyers who want to remain nameless, are considering legal action against him for witness tampering and intimidation. They've said KJ agrees with them and before she leaves (end of 2006) she'll "take care" of Jossy. Most of us can't wait!!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on June 29, 2006, 09:49:24 PM
Quote from: "Windsor"
Mrs Red -- below is what SurfChic wrote on PFN; she had only posted two times at this point; that's why I thought it might be JR.  I don't know how to quote, but it's on page 24 of "Carlos the Colombian" thread:

Most everyone here in aruba knew Carlos was lying!!! He was after the reward money. He's got a long record of drug arrests, like the crackhead from the landfill that Jossy believed. He'll be deported after he does his time for his latest offense. They knew he was lying almost immediately because he said he called his wife and it was checked out and it never happened. His story was always changing and was just too sensational to ever be believed. Jacobs and Adolpho called him "Mansur's MANURE!!!" in reference to all the lying witnesses that Jossy creates, intimidates or fabricates. No one here believes anything or anyone remotely tied to Jossy anymore. He's become the butt of jokes at the local comedy clubs as well. Certain lawyers who want to remain nameless, are considering legal action against him for witness tampering and intimidation. They've said KJ agrees with them and before she leaves (end of 2006) she'll "take care" of Jossy. Most of us can't wait!!!!


Another Refugee, IMO


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Bob in Florida on June 29, 2006, 09:49:29 PM
Hi all, please be patient with me, new to the discussion group...

Seeing the discussion regarding the gardener....

I have always been confused about what exactly the gardener is said to have seen.  I have heard that he reported seeing all 3 suspects in Deepak's car near the pond at about 3 AM.  I have also heard that he is said to have stated that he saw 2 of the suspects, one definitely Joran and a third person 'trying to hide in the car (slumping down).  There have been other reports involving various combinations of who he definitely identified etc.  I have seen lots of arguments discrediting this witness saying he was driving to fast to have seen anyone.  What is the right story?

If he did only see 2 people upright and a third 'slumped over', the third could have been Natalee, freeing up one of the brothers to be at home typing away on the computer to bolster an alibi.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: terryd270 on June 29, 2006, 09:49:34 PM
Mrsred I didn't do it whatever I did...  

Has Easywriter heard anything going on?  I think its kinda of interesting that JQK is doing Greta.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Windsor on June 29, 2006, 09:50:28 PM
Quote from: "terryd270"
Winsor what did you do with our GretaRocks?  Give her back... :D


ah, Ter, you'll like me better  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Dihannah1 on June 29, 2006, 09:50:59 PM
Welcome to SM Bob in FL!  Nice to have new input and thoughts!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on June 29, 2006, 09:51:21 PM
Mrs Red - - I sent you a letter today.  I had to chuckle when I heard Jimmy Buffett's Margaritaville as I sat in the car sealing the envelope and putting the stamp on it.  Then on the way home from the post office I heard Freebird.

I love Lynerd Skynrd.  Southern rock n roll was great back in the early 70's.  Lynerd Skynrd.  The Allman brothers.  Jo Jo Gunn.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: terryd270 on June 29, 2006, 09:51:42 PM
Bob of Florida your not the Florida Power and Light Bob are you?  :D   Anyway welcome to Scared Monkeys..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: San on June 29, 2006, 09:52:25 PM
Quote from: "Windsor"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Windsor"
and could Paulus' comment that he picked "them' up at 4am be Freddy?

I'm very suspicious of Freddy

I'm convinced that Freddy is 100% involved.  Deepak sealed the deal when he said on tape that Freddy needs to tell the truth.  The truth about what?


oh, that's right, San; I had forgotten that; I was just going with my gut that Freddy is involved

and what about Deepak saying "your own father"

to me, that screams involvement before the fact, not just cover up

I was going on my gut also in the beginning but once he opened his mouth he confirmed it.  Once I heard Freddy made that video and then when I saw them walking Freddy into the police station I said to myself this kid is weird.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Windsor on June 29, 2006, 09:53:22 PM
ok; now I'm reallllly goin' to get ready to watch Greta; later Monkeys


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: terryd270 on June 29, 2006, 09:54:05 PM
I guess I better explain, Florida Power and Light has this guy named Bob going around asking how to save electric on the commericals here.. You never see him just hear and see the people responding to his questions.. So I guess only those that live here in Florida will get my question.. Sorry..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on June 29, 2006, 09:56:14 PM
Quote from: "Windsor"
Mrs Red -- below is what SurfChic wrote on PFN; she had only posted two times at this point; that's why I thought it might be JR.  I don't know how to quote, but it's on page 24 of "Carlos the Colombian" thread:

Most everyone here in aruba knew Carlos was lying!!! He was after the reward money. He's got a long record of drug arrests, like the crackhead from the landfill that Jossy believed. He'll be deported after he does his time for his latest offense. They knew he was lying almost immediately because he said he called his wife and it was checked out and it never happened. His story was always changing and was just too sensational to ever be believed. Jacobs and Adolpho called him "Mansur's MANURE!!!" in reference to all the lying witnesses that Jossy creates, intimidates or fabricates. No one here believes anything or anyone remotely tied to Jossy anymore. He's become the butt of jokes at the local comedy clubs as well. Certain lawyers who want to remain nameless, are considering legal action against him for witness tampering and intimidation. They've said KJ agrees with them and before she leaves (end of 2006) she'll "take care" of Jossy. Most of us can't wait!!!!


Scubajap.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: kuoka on June 29, 2006, 09:56:19 PM
Has anyone seen or heard from BTGirl or Angie? I sure miss them!  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on June 29, 2006, 09:57:48 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Windsor"
Mrs Red -- below is what SurfChic wrote on PFN; she had only posted two times at this point; that's why I thought it might be JR.  I don't know how to quote, but it's on page 24 of "Carlos the Colombian" thread:

Most everyone here in aruba knew Carlos was lying!!! He was after the reward money. He's got a long record of drug arrests, like the crackhead from the landfill that Jossy believed. He'll be deported after he does his time for his latest offense. They knew he was lying almost immediately because he said he called his wife and it was checked out and it never happened. His story was always changing and was just too sensational to ever be believed. Jacobs and Adolpho called him "Mansur's MANURE!!!" in reference to all the lying witnesses that Jossy creates, intimidates or fabricates. No one here believes anything or anyone remotely tied to Jossy anymore. He's become the butt of jokes at the local comedy clubs as well. Certain lawyers who want to remain nameless, are considering legal action against him for witness tampering and intimidation. They've said KJ agrees with them and before she leaves (end of 2006) she'll "take care" of Jossy. Most of us can't wait!!!!


Scubajap.


Nope, not scubajap.  She does not write that coherently, so I take that back.  She needs a few lessons in fourth-grade language.  This person is probaby Bon Dia.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Dihannah1 on June 29, 2006, 09:57:53 PM
I've been in email discusstion with BT, she's taking a break for a few days.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: WidgetTheMidget on June 29, 2006, 09:58:13 PM
Quote from: "Bob in Florida"
Hi all, please be patient with me, new to the discussion group...

Seeing the discussion regarding the gardener....

I have always been confused about what exactly the gardener is said to have seen.  I have heard that he reported seeing all 3 suspects in Deepak's car near the pond at about 3 AM.  I have also heard that he is said to have stated that he saw 2 of the suspects, one definitely Joran and a third person 'trying to hide in the car (slumping down).  There have been other reports involving various combinations of who he definitely identified etc.  I have seen lots of arguments discrediting this witness saying he was driving to fast to have seen anyone.  What is the right story?

If he did only see 2 people upright and a third 'slumped over', the third could have been Natalee, freeing up one of the brothers to be at home typing away on the computer to bolster an alibi.


Than Who Witnessed The Witness Driving To FAST ...............

 :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on June 29, 2006, 09:58:30 PM
Greta opens with flooding.

Should be Holloway news coming up.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: kuoka on June 29, 2006, 09:58:58 PM
Quote from: "Dihannah1"
I've been in email discusstion with BT, she's taking a break for a few days.


Oh Ok Dihannah1.. Thanks. Can you ask her to come back? I really miss her.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: WidgetTheMidget on June 29, 2006, 10:00:28 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Greta opens with flooding.

Should be Holloway news coming up.


First Three Game Losing Streak Of The Season ................

 :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: tcumom on June 29, 2006, 10:01:04 PM
Quote from: "Dihannah1"
I've been in email discusstion with BT, she's taking a break for a few days.

Please tell her she needs to cut short her break and get back here! :wink:  :D  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Dihannah1 on June 29, 2006, 10:01:19 PM
Quote from: "kuoka"
Quote from: "Dihannah1"
I've been in email discusstion with BT, she's taking a break for a few days.


Oh Ok Dihannah1.. Thanks. Can you ask her to come back? I really miss her.


I did and she will..... we all miss her and Ang.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: kuoka on June 29, 2006, 10:02:21 PM
Quote from: "tcumom"
Quote from: "Dihannah1"
I've been in email discusstion with BT, she's taking a break for a few days.

Please tell her she needs to cut short her break and get back here! :wink:  :D  :D


Amen tcumom!  :wink:  Now we need to find Angie... Sis!!!! Where are you!!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: San on June 29, 2006, 10:02:43 PM
JQK said this new witness is being charged with one or two things.  Either perjury or extortion.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: kuoka on June 29, 2006, 10:03:23 PM
Quote from: "Dihannah1"


I did and she will..... we all miss her and Ang.


I sure hope so.. the board seems different without them.  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Dihannah1 on June 29, 2006, 10:04:15 PM
Quote from: "San"
JQK said this new witness is being charged with one or two things.  Either perjury or extortion.


Yes, now I'm even more bummed out!  I'm feeling pestimistic again, no solving this case, dammit!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on June 29, 2006, 10:05:18 PM
Quote from: "WidgetTheMidget"
Quote from: "Bob in Florida"
Hi all, please be patient with me, new to the discussion group...

Seeing the discussion regarding the gardener....

I have always been confused about what exactly the gardener is said to have seen.  I have heard that he reported seeing all 3 suspects in Deepak's car near the pond at about 3 AM.  I have also heard that he is said to have stated that he saw 2 of the suspects, one definitely Joran and a third person 'trying to hide in the car (slumping down).  There have been other reports involving various combinations of who he definitely identified etc.  I have seen lots of arguments discrediting this witness saying he was driving to fast to have seen anyone.  What is the right story?

If he did only see 2 people upright and a third 'slumped over', the third could have been Natalee, freeing up one of the brothers to be at home typing away on the computer to bolster an alibi.


Than Who Witnessed The Witness Driving To FAST ...............

 :roll:


Widgey...Our boys lost three in a row.

But we're still 10 games in first.

Big series starts tomorrow!

Arrest

John Q. Kelly:

New charges and witness, this is Carlos the Columbian, looking for the reward money.

I found the story inplausible, could not be corroberated, her story. Karin found it plausible.

Apparently he just admitted that he lied, and that is why he is being held. Being charge with one of two things, either perjury or extortion.

Quickk version, his story was that he saw someone murder and strangle natalee and he saw them get rid of the body.

He has been in custody about 6 or 8 weeks.

I think they were holding him under the guise of illegal immigration., At least she followed up on it, I won't criticize her for that, but something that implausible you cant get too excited over it.

No lead, no new leads it has been very quiet. I have not heard anything . we are now hopin that the civil suit will proceed in NY.

Ready to be decided soon if it will stay in ny or get tossed.

It should be announced soon, it is a good sign that they are taking this much time to consider all this info.

Ok greta, it's not a bad sign.....

I have a jaded view, she has not dismissed the case yet so that is a good sign.

The last search, the ocean search was where this eye witness supposedly saw the body.

I think the searches are over.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on June 29, 2006, 10:05:25 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Windsor"
Mrs Red -- below is what SurfChic wrote on PFN; she had only posted two times at this point; that's why I thought it might be JR.  I don't know how to quote, but it's on page 24 of "Carlos the Colombian" thread:

Most everyone here in aruba knew Carlos was lying!!! He was after the reward money. He's got a long record of drug arrests, like the crackhead from the landfill that Jossy believed. He'll be deported after he does his time for his latest offense. They knew he was lying almost immediately because he said he called his wife and it was checked out and it never happened. His story was always changing and was just too sensational to ever be believed. Jacobs and Adolpho called him "Mansur's MANURE!!!" in reference to all the lying witnesses that Jossy creates, intimidates or fabricates. No one here believes anything or anyone remotely tied to Jossy anymore. He's become the butt of jokes at the local comedy clubs as well. Certain lawyers who want to remain nameless, are considering legal action against him for witness tampering and intimidation. They've said KJ agrees with them and before she leaves (end of 2006) she'll "take care" of Jossy. Most of us can't wait!!!!


Scubajap.


Sorry for not getting it earlier... and I hate to ask but what is PFN?  and Greta 's little chuckle... about the case going forward... and she doesn't dare do that to tacky joe....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: WidgetTheMidget on June 29, 2006, 10:06:02 PM
Quote from: "San"
JQK said this new witness is being charged with one or two things.  Either perjury or extortion.


Remember Joran Lied As A Witness ..............

Wheres The Perjury Charge ??

Oh I Forgot He Was'nt Under Oath .........

Ms Janssen Conveniently Forgot To Swear In Her FIRST Witnesses .........

 :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on June 29, 2006, 10:08:49 PM
Quote from: "WidgetTheMidget"
Quote from: "San"
JQK said this new witness is being charged with one or two things.  Either perjury or extortion.


Remember Joran Lied As A Witness ..............

Wheres The Perjury Charge ??

Oh I Forgot He Was'nt Under Oath .........

Ms Janssen Conveniently Forgot To Swear In Her FIRST Witnesses .........

 :roll:


Hi, Widget, good to see you here.  Hoping the girls and your bride are doing fine.

I think the reason Arleen said we do not understand their system is because she is exactly right.  No one undertands it.  They make it as they go.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Bob in Florida on June 29, 2006, 10:09:37 PM
terryd270:

Hi..No I’m not the FPL Bob...wish I were...maybe I would get a cut rate on power....

I’m in Clearwater and have to pay homage to Progress Energy (actually the only progress associated with their energy are rate increases).

By the way, has Carlos the Columbian been discredited now or is this just another troll story.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on June 29, 2006, 10:11:12 PM
Quote from: "Bob in Florida"
terryd270:

Hi..No I’m not the FPL Bob...wish I were...maybe I would get a cut rate on power....

I’m in Clearwater and have to pay homage to Progress Energy (actually the only progress associated with their energy are rate increases).

By the way, has Carlos the Columbian been discredited now or is this just another troll story.


He has officially been discredited per JQK.  He has admitted to KJ that he lied about the entire thing.  He is now being detained for lying as a witness and possibly extortion.

Hi Bob in Florida!!  Welcome!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: WidgetTheMidget on June 29, 2006, 10:11:28 PM
Karin Janssen Believed The Storytelling Colombian ..........

Shows Where Her Head Is At ...........

Anyone & Anything Outside Of Joran Is Believable For Her ..........

She Does'nt Seem To Want To Get Her Head Outta Her Arse ......

 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: San on June 29, 2006, 10:11:33 PM
Quote from: "WidgetTheMidget"
Quote from: "San"
JQK said this new witness is being charged with one or two things.  Either perjury or extortion.


Remember Joran Lied As A Witness ..............

Wheres The Perjury Charge ??

Oh I Forgot He Was'nt Under Oath .........

Ms Janssen Conveniently Forgot To Swear In Her FIRST Witnesses .........

 :roll:

Wasn't that nice of her to do such a favor for the psychopath.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on June 29, 2006, 10:12:18 PM
Quote from: "Bob in Florida"
terryd270:

Hi..No I’m not the FPL Bob...wish I were...maybe I would get a cut rate on power....

I’m in Clearwater and have to pay homage to Progress Energy (actually the only progress associated with their energy are rate increases).

By the way, has Carlos the Columbian been discredited now or is this just another troll story.


John Q. Kelly pretty much proved him for what he was :

A fraud.

Just out for the money.

He apparently conned karin Jansen into believing his story.

kelly never thought he was plausible from the beginning.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: San on June 29, 2006, 10:14:54 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "WidgetTheMidget"


Remember Joran Lied As A Witness ..............

Wheres The Perjury Charge ??

Oh I Forgot He Was'nt Under Oath .........

Ms Janssen Conveniently Forgot To Swear In Her FIRST Witnesses .........

 :roll:


Hi, Widget, good to see you here.  Hoping the girls and your bride are doing fine.

I think the reason Arleen said we do not understand their system is because she is exactly right.  No one undertands it.  They make it as they go.


They change the laws like they change their underwear.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on June 29, 2006, 10:16:12 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Windsor"
Mrs Red -- below is what SurfChic wrote on PFN; she had only posted two times at this point; that's why I thought it might be JR.  I don't know how to quote, but it's on page 24 of "Carlos the Colombian" thread:

Most everyone here in aruba knew Carlos was lying!!! He was after the reward money. He's got a long record of drug arrests, like the crackhead from the landfill that Jossy believed. He'll be deported after he does his time for his latest offense. They knew he was lying almost immediately because he said he called his wife and it was checked out and it never happened. His story was always changing and was just too sensational to ever be believed. Jacobs and Adolpho called him "Mansur's MANURE!!!" in reference to all the lying witnesses that Jossy creates, intimidates or fabricates. No one here believes anything or anyone remotely tied to Jossy anymore. He's become the butt of jokes at the local comedy clubs as well. Certain lawyers who want to remain nameless, are considering legal action against him for witness tampering and intimidation. They've said KJ agrees with them and before she leaves (end of 2006) she'll "take care" of Jossy. Most of us can't wait!!!!


Scubajap.


Nope, not scubajap.  She does not write that coherently, so I take that back.  She needs a few lessons in fourth-grade language.  This person is probaby Bon Dia.


Sure looked like Scuba to me.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: WidgetTheMidget on June 29, 2006, 10:16:37 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "WidgetTheMidget"
Quote from: "San"
JQK said this new witness is being charged with one or two things.  Either perjury or extortion.


Remember Joran Lied As A Witness ..............

Wheres The Perjury Charge ??

Oh I Forgot He Was'nt Under Oath .........

Ms Janssen Conveniently Forgot To Swear In Her FIRST Witnesses .........

 :roll:


Hi, Widget, good to see you here.  Hoping the girls and your bride are doing fine.

I think the reason Arleen said we do not understand their system is because she is exactly right.  No one undertands it.  They make it as they go.


Hi Tyler ..............

Alls Quiet On The Western Front ..............

 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on June 29, 2006, 10:16:45 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "WidgetTheMidget"


Remember Joran Lied As A Witness ..............

Wheres The Perjury Charge ??

Oh I Forgot He Was'nt Under Oath .........

Ms Janssen Conveniently Forgot To Swear In Her FIRST Witnesses .........

 :roll:


Hi, Widget, good to see you here.  Hoping the girls and your bride are doing fine.

I think the reason Arleen said we do not understand their system is because she is exactly right.  No one undertands it.  They make it as they go.


They change the laws like they change their underwear.


more often actually.....

besoes widgey!!  good to see you...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on June 29, 2006, 10:17:19 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "WidgetTheMidget"


Remember Joran Lied As A Witness ..............

Wheres The Perjury Charge ??

Oh I Forgot He Was'nt Under Oath .........

Ms Janssen Conveniently Forgot To Swear In Her FIRST Witnesses .........

 :roll:


Hi, Widget, good to see you here.  Hoping the girls and your bride are doing fine.

I think the reason Arleen said we do not understand their system is because she is exactly right.  No one undertands it.  They make it as they go.


They change the laws like they change their underwear.


What makes you think they change their underwear as often as their laws?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on June 29, 2006, 10:18:11 PM
is scuba jap the dark haired reporter that was in the Vanity Fair article?  how could JK "get" jossy... what a crock... :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on June 29, 2006, 10:19:24 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
is scuba jap the dark haired reporter that was in the Vanity Fair article?  how could JK "get" jossy... what a crock... :roll:


Yes, Angela, the one who describes herself as very similar to Elizabeth Taylor. :roll:  :lol:  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on June 29, 2006, 10:20:16 PM
Oh Mrs Red I had a server die on me today and I have a ton of work ahead of me now.

Poor decisions I've made in coding in the past for what I considered better performance has me recoding for changes due to the crash.

Course better backup discipline also would have helped.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on June 29, 2006, 10:20:51 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Windsor"
Mrs Red -- below is what SurfChic wrote on PFN; she had only posted two times at this point; that's why I thought it might be JR.  I don't know how to quote, but it's on page 24 of "Carlos the Colombian" thread:

Most everyone here in aruba knew Carlos was lying!!! He was after the reward money. He's got a long record of drug arrests, like the crackhead from the landfill that Jossy believed. He'll be deported after he does his time for his latest offense. They knew he was lying almost immediately because he said he called his wife and it was checked out and it never happened. His story was always changing and was just too sensational to ever be believed. Jacobs and Adolpho called him "Mansur's MANURE!!!" in reference to all the lying witnesses that Jossy creates, intimidates or fabricates. No one here believes anything or anyone remotely tied to Jossy anymore. He's become the butt of jokes at the local comedy clubs as well. Certain lawyers who want to remain nameless, are considering legal action against him for witness tampering and intimidation. They've said KJ agrees with them and before she leaves (end of 2006) she'll "take care" of Jossy. Most of us can't wait!!!!


Scubajap.


Nope, not scubajap.  She does not write that coherently, so I take that back.  She needs a few lessons in fourth-grade language.  This person is probaby Bon Dia.


Sure looked like Scuba to me.


Carnut...............remember,,,when she would rite like this; to make her point............that she hated Beth,,,and everybody else,,,but her own beautiful self,,,,who had so many social events to attend,,,and so many.....lacivious nights on the ............beach.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: igsigs on June 29, 2006, 10:20:55 PM
Quote from: "San"
JQK said this new witness is being charged with one or two things.  Either perjury or extortion.

Perjury?  :lol:  :lol:

If they make perjury a crime in Aruba it will become a penal colony.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Dihannah1 on June 29, 2006, 10:21:02 PM
Mrs. Red,  "You Have Mail"


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: WidgetTheMidget on June 29, 2006, 10:21:22 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "WidgetTheMidget"


Remember Joran Lied As A Witness ..............

Wheres The Perjury Charge ??

Oh I Forgot He Was'nt Under Oath .........

Ms Janssen Conveniently Forgot To Swear In Her FIRST Witnesses .........

 :roll:


Hi, Widget, good to see you here.  Hoping the girls and your bride are doing fine.

I think the reason Arleen said we do not understand their system is because she is exactly right.  No one undertands it.  They make it as they go.


They change the laws like they change their underwear.


more often actually.....

besoes widgey!!  good to see you...


Hola Mrs Red .........

Abrazos & Besos ...............

 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: terryd270 on June 29, 2006, 10:21:38 PM
I thought everyone on that island was related in someway.. I guess Carlos the Colombian didn't have any relatives in the police force or the Dutch family tree..

I didn't like the feeling I got that JQK was putting so much in getting justice through the civil case..  I was thinking this was more of a nusance then really a way of getting justice.. We think their criminal cases are close try to find their financial trail.. I just didn't feel good to hear JQK saying that they were hoping for the civil case to move forward for justice..These are just my thoughts..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on June 29, 2006, 10:21:39 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "San"
JQK said this new witness is being charged with one or two things.  Either perjury or extortion.

Perjury?  :lol:  :lol:

If they make perjury a crime in Aruba it will become a penal colony.


Well, I am not going to touch that one but I am glad your spelling is good. :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on June 29, 2006, 10:22:37 PM
Quote from: "WidgetTheMidget"
Karin Janssen Believed The Storytelling Colombian ..........

Shows Where Her Head Is At ...........


I think that if she believed the Columbian witness, it was b/c she does want to prosecute Joran.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on June 29, 2006, 10:22:41 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "San"
JQK said this new witness is being charged with one or two things.  Either perjury or extortion.

Perjury?  :lol:  :lol:

If they make perjury a crime in Aruba it will become a penal colony.


Well, I am not going to touch that one but I am glad your spelling is good. :wink:


Hee!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on June 29, 2006, 10:23:24 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Carnut"

Sure looked like Scuba to me.


Carnut...............remember,,,when she would rite like this; to make her point............that she hated Beth,,,and everybody else,,,but her own beautiful self,,,,who had so many social events to attend,,,and so many.....lacivious nights on the ............beach.


Yes I do, but I think I remember some more lenghty posts with similar point of view and descriptions of events as was posted without the ....... and social event info.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: WidgetTheMidget on June 29, 2006, 10:25:02 PM
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
Quote from: "WidgetTheMidget"
Karin Janssen Believed The Storytelling Colombian ..........

Shows Where Her Head Is At ...........


I think that if she believed the Columbian witness, it was b/c she does want to prosecute Joran.


The Only Way She Could Think He Was Describing Joran Is If Joran

Went To His House To Get Bleach For His Hair .....

 :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: terryd270 on June 29, 2006, 10:26:24 PM
Taylergal,

I remember scubajap and how she was an expert on everything..  How she acted exactly like Julia in the way she would say I will be back later I have to do a report or something.. She was saying that she used to be a dive master and was always hinting that Natalee might of drowned.. So scubajap isn't Julia?  They sure sound the same to me..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Shizaru on June 29, 2006, 10:26:49 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
is scuba jap the dark haired reporter that was in the Vanity Fair article?  


That would be Angela M.  I've read that she and SJ are the same but I'm not sure, I read a posting by Angela someone found on an Internet psychic's site and it didn't read like SJ.  Also SJ doesn't seem quite as full of venom towards Natalee as Angela did in that VF article, I've actually seen her defend Natalee a few times. Someone suggested that SJ might acually be a shared nic.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on June 29, 2006, 10:28:11 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
is scuba jap the dark haired reporter that was in the Vanity Fair article?  how could JK "get" jossy... what a crock... :roll:


Yes, Angela, the one who describes herself as very similar to Elizabeth Taylor. :roll:  :lol:  :roll:


Whew, took me forever to find this:

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/Munzehofer.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on June 29, 2006, 10:28:22 PM
Quote from: "WidgetTheMidget"


The Only Way She Could Think He Was Describing Joran Is If Joran

Went To His House To Get Bleach For His Hair .....

 :roll:


Light hair, dark hair.  Thin, medium, stocky.  It's all in a person's own perspective.  Maybe to a dark-haired Columbian, Joran's hair is light.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Dihannah1 on June 29, 2006, 10:29:34 PM
Klaas, is there anything you don't have?  You are soooo awesome with pics and resources!  What would we do without YOU!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on June 29, 2006, 10:31:24 PM
Hey I can see TerryD's and my avatars, tonight.  :D  :D  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: wreck on June 29, 2006, 10:31:30 PM
Sounded like scubajap to me too! If Jacobs and Richardson are belittling him -- we need to SERIOUSLY re-evaluate him again. I don't know why everyone is so believing of ALE and KG again.
The more Aruba "discredits" someone -- the more inclined I am to believe that "someone" .


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: igsigs on June 29, 2006, 10:32:09 PM
Never thought that scuba was JR.

There was a poster on scrux named *witness* that sure did, though. :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on June 29, 2006, 10:32:54 PM
Good night Monkeys!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: WidgetTheMidget on June 29, 2006, 10:33:19 PM
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
Quote from: "WidgetTheMidget"


The Only Way She Could Think He Was Describing Joran Is If Joran

Went To His House To Get Bleach For His Hair .....

 :roll:


Light hair, dark hair.  Thin, medium, stocky.  It's all in a person's own perspective.  Maybe to a dark-haired Columbian, Joran's hair is light.


A Belt & What Looked Like Natalees Top Never Sent For Forensics ...But..

They Send This Evidence To The NFI Provided By Lying Witness ..........

Karin Janssen Is On PVDS's Side ...............

Actions Speak Louder Than Words ..................

 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Bob in Florida on June 29, 2006, 10:34:08 PM
To WidgetTheMidget:

Regarding my earlier post on the gardener drive to fast...the most notable reference for that remark came from Isaac Chin and it book "the Natalee Holloway Case".  Chin is an Aruban resident, retired engineer, and writer of very obscure books.  In his book on the case (don't even think about wasting your money like I did and buying it), supposed he retraced the route the gardener took and tried to tie it to a time line and concluded the gardener would have to have been traveling at approximately 70 miles an hour to get from his house to where he reported seeing the 3 amigos in the car by the pond in the time he reported.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Dihannah1 on June 29, 2006, 10:37:54 PM
Quote from: "Bob in Florida"
To WidgetTheMidget:

Regarding my earlier post on the gardener drive to fast...the most notable reference for that remark came from Isaac Chin and it book "the Natalee Holloway Case".  Chin is an Aruban resident, retired engineer, and writer of very obscure books.  In his book on the case (don't even think about wasting your money like I did and buying it), supposed he retraced the route the gardener took and tried to tie it to a time line and concluded the gardener would have to have been traveling at approximately 70 miles an hour to get from his house to where he reported seeing the 3 amigos in the car by the pond in the time he reported.


Wow there is another person (not related to case) trying to get rich off this case?  And an Aruban, but thanks for the warning!  Makes me sick!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Dihannah1 on June 29, 2006, 10:38:47 PM
Isn't Julia Renfro writing a get rich book too?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: San on June 29, 2006, 10:40:11 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
is scuba jap the dark haired reporter that was in the Vanity Fair article?  how could JK "get" jossy... what a crock... :roll:


Yes, Angela, the one who describes herself as very similar to Elizabeth Taylor. :roll:  :lol:  :roll:

She is no Elizabeth Taylor :lol:
(http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d118/Sanddrops/Scuba.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: WidgetTheMidget on June 29, 2006, 10:40:32 PM
Quote from: "Bob in Florida"
To WidgetTheMidget:

Regarding my earlier post on the gardener drive to fast...the most notable reference for that remark came from Isaac Chin and it book "the Natalee Holloway Case".  Chin is an Aruban resident, retired engineer, and writer of very obscure books.  In his book on the case (don't even think about wasting your money like I did and buying it), supposed he retraced the route the gardener took and tried to tie it to a time line and concluded the gardener would have to have been traveling at approximately 70 miles an hour to get from his house to where he reported seeing the 3 amigos in the car by the pond in the time he reported.


Welcome Bob In Florida ..........

Well 70 MPH Seems To Be The NOrmal Speed In Aruba .........

Deepak Supposedly Logged On His Computer At 2 AM ..........

After Going Around The Block 3 Times .............

Going By Jorans ...........

Driving To The Lighthouse ..............

Dropping The Idiot Off At The Marriot ..........

Than Driving Home & Arriving At 2 AM ...............

Deepak Would Have To Be Traveling At 105 MPH .........

Without Stops ................

 :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: terryd270 on June 29, 2006, 10:40:33 PM
Seriously, these kids aren't normal.. I know if I was a kid and there was this kid that I knew had done things like this before and I heard him bragging about his conquest and stuff like that.. I would be $250.000.00 richer with a few hours with that kid (Joran).. I would think there would be a lot of kids on that island that would want to collect the $250.000.00...  Are they that afraid of getting arrested or being killed..  I assume that JQK has informants and people over there getting this type of information.. What about Jossy he knows the right people to get this kind of information.. How can the PIMPS have that much control, there got to be another gang on the island that would find this a perfect time to get rid of the PIMPS..  I guess I just putting this out there, frustration...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on June 29, 2006, 10:41:17 PM
Quote from: "terryd270"
Taylergal,

I remember scubajap and how she was an expert on everything..  How she acted exactly like Julia in the way she would say I will be back later I have to do a report or something.. She was saying that she used to be a dive master and was always hinting that Natalee might of drowned.. So scubajap isn't Julia?  They sure sound the same to me..


No, they are not the same one but SJ's brother-in-law owns one of those ski rental places.  I was going to check to see if it was the one where the guy went to get his ski equipment and never returned.

Julia is the editor and Angela is her lackey.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Dihannah1 on June 29, 2006, 10:41:33 PM
Wonder if she's been married as much as ET?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: San on June 29, 2006, 10:42:22 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
is scuba jap the dark haired reporter that was in the Vanity Fair article?  how could JK "get" jossy... what a crock... :roll:


Yes, Angela, the one who describes herself as very similar to Elizabeth Taylor. :roll:  :lol:  :roll:


Whew, took me forever to find this:


 :lol:  :lol: We were looking for the same picture.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on June 29, 2006, 10:42:38 PM
Quote from: "terryd270"
Taylergal,

I remember scubajap and how she was an expert on everything..  How she acted exactly like Julia in the way she would say I will be back later I have to do a report or something.. She was saying that she used to be a dive master and was always hinting that Natalee might of drowned.. So scubajap isn't Julia?  They sure sound the same to me..

 

no Julia is bon dia/ glenda/ ... I forgot her other name :oops:  and scuba I think works with her..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: WidgetTheMidget on June 29, 2006, 10:42:43 PM
Quote from: "terryd270"
Seriously, these kids aren't normal.. I know if I was a kid and there was this kid that I knew had done things like this before and I heard him bragging about his conquest and stuff like that.. I would be $250.000.00 richer with a few hours with that kid (Joran).. I would think there would be a lot of kids on that island that would want to collect the $250.000.00...  Are they that afraid of getting arrested or being killed..  I assume that JQK has informants and people over there getting this type of information.. What about Jossy he knows the right people to get this kind of information.. How can the PIMPS have that much control, there got to be another gang on the island that would find this a perfect time to get rid of the PIMPS..  I guess I just putting this out there, frustration...


Yes Terry Its True .... They Are ................

The Children Of The Damned .....................

 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on June 29, 2006, 10:42:59 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Carnut"

Sure looked like Scuba to me.


Carnut...............remember,,,when she would rite like this; to make her point............that she hated Beth,,,and everybody else,,,but her own beautiful self,,,,who had so many social events to attend,,,and so many.....lacivious nights on the ............beach.


Yes I do, but I think I remember some more lenghty posts with similar point of view and descriptions of events as was posted without the ....... and social event info.


Oh, yeah.  I forgot one minor detail. :wink:  Correspondence.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Dihannah1 on June 29, 2006, 10:43:28 PM
Quote from: "terryd270"
Seriously, these kids aren't normal.. I know if I was a kid and there was this kid that I knew had done things like this before and I heard him bragging about his conquest and stuff like that.. I would be $250.000.00 richer with a few hours with that kid (Joran).. I would think there would be a lot of kids on that island that would want to collect the $250.000.00...  Are they that afraid of getting arrested or being killed..  I assume that JQK has informants and people over there getting this type of information.. What about Jossy he knows the right people to get this kind of information.. How can the PIMPS have that much control, there got to be another gang on the island that would find this a perfect time to get rid of the PIMPS..  I guess I just putting this out there, frustration...


I agree Terry,  I always thought $$ talked...  Wonder what is holding 'somebody who knows' from talking.  Very interesting...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on June 29, 2006, 10:43:55 PM
Quote from: "San"
JQK said this new witness is being charged with one or two things.  Either perjury or extortion.

Perjury ??? You can lie all you want in Aruba. Just ask Joran. You can lie
to the police, you can lie and interfere with an investigation, you can lie to yo' Mama, you can bribe other ppl to lie about you, you can pay ppl to come forth with aliblis. But as long as it wasn't to a judge, you was
still a fine upstanding citizen. You can get Joe T to lie if youse pays him enuf. And if you are Dompig'd kid, well, you can lie and have your former friend arrested ! ! ! :wink:  :wink:
.....
This  "witness ", I never believed it from he get go and neither did Jossy.
But, he did sign a paper about the reward money at Helen Lejuez's office.
.....
So KJ is going to get Jossy. :oops:  Isn't she one of the ones that was described as unprofessional and Dompig's investigation dscribed as " strange ".
She might be getting herself.
LOL  What a strange crew they have on watch on Aruba    :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on June 29, 2006, 10:45:04 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Never thought that scuba was JR.

There was a poster on scrux named *witness* that sure did, though. :wink:


There was a time when they posted on RWV together when SM was down and their syntax is somewhat different, although they both are very full of themselves and are both moneymongers.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: San on June 29, 2006, 10:45:34 PM
Quote from: "Dihannah1"
Isn't Julia Renfro writing a get rich book too?

She's writing a bitch book.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on June 29, 2006, 10:46:39 PM
ok..I just read that post about Liz Taylor where DiHannah said ET and thought of an alien... with a glowing finger... so I know I need sleep ...

take care and keep the faith monkeys... see you tomorrow...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on June 29, 2006, 10:46:51 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Dihannah1"
Isn't Julia Renfro writing a get rich book too?

She's writing a bitch book.
:lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: WidgetTheMidget on June 29, 2006, 10:47:02 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Dihannah1"
Isn't Julia Renfro writing a get rich book too?

She's writing a bitch book.


Shes A Rich , Witch , Bitch .............

 :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: igsigs on June 29, 2006, 10:47:11 PM
Quote from: "Dihannah1"
Isn't Julia Renfro writing a get rich book too?


I'm sure she thought about it. And i am sure she would have liked to. But when she had a falling out with Natalee's family her gravy train was de-railed. That might explain her current...errr...position.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on June 29, 2006, 10:48:21 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
ok..I just read that post about Liz Taylor where DiHannah said ET and thought of an alien... with a glowing finger... so I know I need sleep ...

take care and keep the faith monkeys... see you tomorrow...


Good night, rest well.  No news, just verified what Easy had told us via his source.  I see why Jossy was worried about this witness.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: terryd270 on June 29, 2006, 10:48:48 PM
Tylergal,

How many evil, vicious woman live on that island.  Is that Julia's sidekick Angela an American?  I think they need different nic's more like Julia Renfro, a.k.a. "The Black Widow" a.k.a. "The Dangerous Diva" a.k.a "The Toxic Tempress" a.k.a. "The Woman Who Goes Around Killing Lots Of People".  

I know I need to tone it down because we don't want to hurt Julia's feeling do we?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: WidgetTheMidget on June 29, 2006, 10:49:12 PM
G.W. Bush's Popularity Ratings On The Upswing ..............

Even A Blind Squirrel Finds An Acorn One In Awhile ...............

 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: terryd270 on June 29, 2006, 10:49:26 PM
Sleep well mrsred and stay dry..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Dihannah1 on June 29, 2006, 10:49:28 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
ok..I just read that post about Liz Taylor where DiHannah said ET and thought of an alien... with a glowing finger... so I know I need sleep ...

take care and keep the faith monkeys... see you tomorrow...



LOL Mrs. Red.  I'm just too lazy to type!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Dihannah1 on June 29, 2006, 10:50:18 PM
G'night and sweet dreams Mrs. Red!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: terryd270 on June 29, 2006, 10:51:14 PM
I hope we hear something positive soon.. I'm going to bed also and if I don't talk to you tomorrow then have good weekend..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Dihannah1 on June 29, 2006, 10:52:20 PM
Quote from: "terryd270"
I hope we hear something positive soon.. I'm going to bed also and if I don't talk to you tomorrow then have good weekend..


I'm feeling nothing positive this weekend on the case.  But hope your weekend is wonderful!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Dihannah1 on June 29, 2006, 10:54:07 PM
Ok, my bedtime too.  Have a wonderful productive (on the case) night and sweet dreams!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Red on June 29, 2006, 10:54:11 PM
This is way off topic, but if you all get around to it ...
New Front page post.


Supreme Court Stupidity; Salim Ahmed Hamdan Decision … SCOTUS 5-3 that the trials for 10 foreign terror suspects violate U.S. military law & the Geneva conventions.

http://tinyurl.com/k7elb


Comment from Nancy Pelosi ... “Today’s Supreme Court decision reaffirms the American ideal that all are entitled to the basic guarantees of our justice system. This is a triumph for the rule of law".

Take a good look on the FP as to who the SCOTUS just gave the rule of law to and Geneva Conventions rights to as well. WOW


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on June 29, 2006, 10:55:22 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Carnut"

Sure looked like Scuba to me.


Carnut...............remember,,,when she would rite like this; to make her point............that she hated Beth,,,and everybody else,,,but her own beautiful self,,,,who had so many social events to attend,,,and so many.....lacivious nights on the ............beach.


Yes I do, but I think I remember some more lenghty posts with similar point of view and descriptions of events as was posted without the ....... and social event info.


Oh, yeah.  I forgot one minor detail. :wink:  Correspondence.


Un oh, ya aren't gonna hold that against me are ya?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on June 29, 2006, 10:58:37 PM
Quote from: "Red"
This is way off topic, but if you all get around to it ...
New Front page post.


Supreme Court Stupidity; Salim Ahmed Hamdan Decision … SCOTUS 5-3 that the trials for 10 foreign terror suspects violate U.S. military law & the Geneva conventions.

http://tinyurl.com/k7elb


Comment from Nancy Pelosi ... “Today’s Supreme Court decision reaffirms the American ideal that all are entitled to the basic guarantees of our justice system. This is a triumph for the rule of law".

Take a good look on the FP as to who the SCOTUS just gave the rule of law to and Geneva Conventions rights to as well. WOW


Pretty soon on the battle field our grunts will have to 'marandize' anyone they plan on shooting or capturing.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Bob in Florida on June 29, 2006, 11:00:15 PM
terryd270:

I think the 250K$ reward isn't enough to break the silence of those truly in the know on Aruba, meaning those involved in what happened to Natalee.  There has been much speculation about there being a large scale cover-up (involving government officially, police, the suspects, friends etc.).  But I think the number of people who actually know what happened to Natalee is limited to J2K and Paulas.  If it weren't, the odds go way up that the truth will come out.  The others really don't have the information (meaning van der Stratten, JK, Jacobs, even Obador (the Prime Minister)).  They are all involved in helping to pull off ruining the case due to friendship ties, family ties, and political ties but they don't I think few really know where Natalee is and what happened. With their involvement, they would subject to prosecution in Holland if they talk...and the 250K$ would begin to pay the resulting lawyer fees.

Joran and the Kalpoes probably have not discussed this much with friends, yet.  They will someday - look at Joran and his new blog site.

It has been suggested on SM that the time has come for the 1 million dollar reward to be changed to 'for information leading to the recovery' of Natalee from the present 'safe return'.  With a million, one of those involved could rat out the others and start a new life..' but not on 250K.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on June 29, 2006, 11:02:43 PM
WoooHooo!!! I just learned how to put more than one IP address on a Linux box with just one NIC.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Sam on June 29, 2006, 11:04:59 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Red"
This is way off topic, but if you all get around to it ...
New Front page post.


Supreme Court Stupidity; Salim Ahmed Hamdan Decision … SCOTUS 5-3 that the trials for 10 foreign terror suspects violate U.S. military law & the Geneva conventions.

http://tinyurl.com/k7elb


Comment from Nancy Pelosi ... “Today’s Supreme Court decision reaffirms the American ideal that all are entitled to the basic guarantees of our justice system. This is a triumph for the rule of law".

Take a good look on the FP as to who the SCOTUS just gave the rule of law to and Geneva Conventions rights to as well. WOW


Pretty soon on the battle field our grunts will have to 'marandize' anyone they plan on shooting or capturing.


I know that some on here will not like this post , But if I were a grunt I would probaly not capture anyone. In other words take no prisoners. JMHO

Sam


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: igsigs on June 29, 2006, 11:07:27 PM
Anybody get a good read on the Greta/JQK civil discussion? They were joking around and i could not tell if the judge's slowness was being referred to as good or bad.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on June 29, 2006, 11:09:18 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Anybody get a good read on the Greta/JQK civil discussion? They were joking around and i could not tell if the judge's slowness was being referred to as good or bad.


Kinda appeared to be just what they were discussing.

The glass could be half full or half empty depending on who was looking.

Greta appeared to question JQK's assertion that the slowness was good.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on June 29, 2006, 11:09:34 PM
A very helpful person, VMS, just emailed me a couple of better photos of Angela:

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/angelaM1.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on June 29, 2006, 11:10:08 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Carnut"

Sure looked like Scuba to me.


Carnut...............remember,,,when she would rite like this; to make her point............that she hated Beth,,,and everybody else,,,but her own beautiful self,,,,who had so many social events to attend,,,and so many.....lacivious nights on the ............beach.


Yes I do, but I think I remember some more lenghty posts with similar point of view and descriptions of events as was posted without the ....... and social event info.


Oh, yeah.  I forgot one minor detail. :wink:  Correspondence.


Un oh, ya aren't gonna hold that against me are ya?


You know better than that.  After all, you flattered me when you said you thought I was GT.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on June 29, 2006, 11:11:28 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Anybody get a good read on the Greta/JQK civil discussion? They were joking around and i could not tell if the judge's slowness was being referred to as good or bad.

JQK was attempting to suggest it was a good thing and Greta was pressing him about it.  JQK said he really didn't know if it was a good thing but he preferred to think of it as good.  I think Greta was trying to see if JQK had any inside info regarding how the judge might decide.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Sam on June 29, 2006, 11:11:46 PM
Quote from: "Bob in Florida"
terryd270:

I think the 250K$ reward isn't enough to break the silence of those truly in the know on Aruba, meaning those involved in what happened to Natalee.  There has been much speculation about there being a large scale cover-up (involving government officially, police, the suspects, friends etc.).  But I think the number of people who actually know what happened to Natalee is limited to J2K and Paulas.  If it weren't, the odds go way up that the truth will come out.  The others really don't have the information (meaning van der Stratten, JK, Jacobs, even Obador (the Prime Minister)).  They are all involved in helping to pull off ruining the case due to friendship ties, family ties, and political ties but they don't I think few really know where Natalee is and what happened. With their involvement, they would subject to prosecution in Holland if they talk...and the 250K$ would begin to pay the resulting lawyer fees.

Joran and the Kalpoes probably have not discussed this much with friends, yet.  They will someday - look at Joran and his new blog site.

It has been suggested on SM that the time has come for the 1 million dollar reward to be changed to 'for information leading to the recovery' of Natalee from the present 'safe return'.  With a million, one of those involved could rat out the others and start a new life..' but not on 250K.


The sad thing is the million dollar reward is put up by Joe Mamana SP? It is really only gaurrenteed for the safe return which was never really expected to be paid. I also understand from the darkside JM has some financial woes of his own.

Sam


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on June 29, 2006, 11:12:31 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "igsigs"
Anybody get a good read on the Greta/JQK civil discussion? They were joking around and i could not tell if the judge's slowness was being referred to as good or bad.


Kinda appeared to be just what they were discussing.

The glass could be half full or half empty depending on who was looking.

Greta appeared to question JQK's assertion that the slowness was good.


That's what I thought.  I guess I need to take a Greta pill because lately she has been causing me a good bit of constipation.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on June 29, 2006, 11:12:38 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
A very helpful person, VMS, just emailed me a couple of better photos of Angela:

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/angelaM1.jpg)


I'm not real good at guessing ages, but that lady looks rather young to me.

Scuba seemed to be very proud of being the mother of a 20 yr old and her description past activities seemed to age her to me to at least be in her late 40's. the girl pictured looks a lot younger to me.

Old pic? or Different lady from Scuba?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on June 29, 2006, 11:13:35 PM
Quote from: "Red"
This is way off topic, but if you all get around to it ...
New Front page post.


Supreme Court Stupidity; Salim Ahmed Hamdan Decision … SCOTUS 5-3 that the trials for 10 foreign terror suspects violate U.S. military law & the Geneva conventions.

http://tinyurl.com/k7elb


BRAVO, Red!!

Your editorial is GREAT.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: igsigs on June 29, 2006, 11:15:45 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "igsigs"
Anybody get a good read on the Greta/JQK civil discussion? They were joking around and i could not tell if the judge's slowness was being referred to as good or bad.

JQK was attempting to suggest it was a good thing and Greta was pressing him about it.  JQK said he really didn't know if it was a good thing but he preferred to think of it as good.  I think Greta was trying to see if JQK had any inside info regarding how the judge might decide.

Thanks Klass and Carnut. I was kinda distracted and at first it sounded to me like Greta was implying that it was 'obvious' that the delay was a good thing and was trying to get JQK to admit it. But i will go with your versions.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on June 29, 2006, 11:16:40 PM
Quote from: "terryd270"
Tylergal,

How many evil, vicious woman live on that island.  Is that Julia's sidekick Angela an American?  I think they need different nic's more like Julia Renfro, a.k.a. "The Black Widow" a.k.a. "The Dangerous Diva" a.k.a "The Toxic Tempress" a.k.a. "The Woman Who Goes Around Killing Lots Of People".  

I know I need to tone it down because we don't want to hurt Julia's feeling do we?

Didn't you find JR's resume ? C'mon, no one is looking ! ! ! :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on June 29, 2006, 11:18:52 PM
Quote from: "Sam"


The sad thing is the million dollar reward is put up by Joe Mamana SP? It is really only gaurrenteed for the safe return which was never really expected to be paid. I also understand from the darkside JM has some financial woes of his own.

Sam


I've been under the impression that Joe M put up the last $250,000.00 to bring it to $1 million.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on June 29, 2006, 11:21:57 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "klaasend"
A very helpful person, VMS, just emailed me a couple of better photos of Angela:

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/angelaM1.jpg)


I'm not real good at guessing ages, but that lady looks rather young to me.

Scuba seemed to be very proud of being the mother of a 20 yr old and her description past activities seemed to age her to me to at least be in her late 40's. the girl pictured looks a lot younger to me.

Old pic? or Different lady from Scuba?


Well, Carnut, I can assure you when I had a 20-year-old son I looked no older nor near as fat as this cat.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Sam on June 29, 2006, 11:22:33 PM
Tylergal,
I am signing off and going to bed now but wanted to let you know I went to the 2 websites you posted much earlier and spent alot of time reading about the missing, kidnapped American children and also the social mores of the Netherlands. No wonder there is no crime in Aruba. Nothing there is illegal.

Sam


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on June 29, 2006, 11:24:16 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "klaasend"
A very helpful person, VMS, just emailed me a couple of better photos of Angela:

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/angelaM1.jpg)


I'm not real good at guessing ages, but that lady looks rather young to me.

Scuba seemed to be very proud of being the mother of a 20 yr old and her description past activities seemed to age her to me to at least be in her late 40's. the girl pictured looks a lot younger to me.

Old pic? or Different lady from Scuba?

The photo is from a wedding where it looks like her son is getting married.  Her son looks like he could be in his 20's.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on June 29, 2006, 11:24:20 PM
Quote from: "Sam"
Tylergal,
I am signing off and going to bed now but wanted to let you know I went to the 2 websites you posted much earlier and spent alot of time reading about the missing, kidnapped American children and also the social mores of the Netherlands. No wonder there is no crime in Aruba. Nothing there is illegal.

Sam


Sam, it was eye opening, don't you think.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: wreck on June 29, 2006, 11:26:14 PM
Waterboy (previously, Jerry) Says: (on FP)
June 29th, 2006 at 11:10 pm
Quote
So, what I’m thinking is the post that evoked the most anger, other than the ones that were just running Aruba down are probable right on the money.


I agree with this!
If you take ALL the posts on different blogs that get the most reaction from "the dark side" or trolls -- we can bet we are getting very close to the truth with that topic!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: igsigs on June 29, 2006, 11:26:54 PM
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
I also understand from the darkside JM has some financial woes of his own.

Well, if anyone knows about financial woes it would be the darkside. They will be enjoying their beachfront vacations allright. Only now they will be sharing quarters with Boeti. 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Sam on June 29, 2006, 11:27:32 PM
Carnut,

I too looked younger and slimmer than that when I was in my mid 40's.


Oh also forgot this in my last post but I also went to the lounge and there was a post from one of our posters. JA who had alot of flooding in her home in New York state.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Anna on June 29, 2006, 11:42:51 PM
.

Fat People don't wrinkle much, Carnut.


 8)

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: igsigs on June 29, 2006, 11:47:34 PM
And since when does a bogus witness rate a 2 month media blackout?

Was it just to give the impression that they were working?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on June 29, 2006, 11:52:01 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
.

Fat People don't wrinkle much, Carnut.


 8)

.


It appears that it is confirmed that I am not a very good judge of ladies ages.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on June 29, 2006, 11:53:35 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
And since when does a bogus witness rate a 2 month media blackout?

Was it just to give the impression that they were working?

BINGO


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on June 29, 2006, 11:54:11 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
And since when does a bogus witness rate a 2 month media blackout?

Was it just to give the impression that they were working?



Dunno, JQK stated that he thought KJ was really believeing in the witness even though JQK had been sceptical.

Maybe KJ is pretty good at telling JQK believable stories?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: igsigs on June 30, 2006, 12:01:51 AM
Quote from: "Carnut"

Maybe KJ is pretty good at telling JQK believable stories?

Might well be Carnut. I have been trying so hard to get a read on KJ via JQK's words, but he has been pretty neutral. Tonight was the first time i felt that he had little respect for her as a lawyer.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: spooky112483 on June 30, 2006, 12:02:08 AM
RED
Excellent FP!!!!!!!!!
Two thumbs way up and a standing ovation :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on June 30, 2006, 12:03:02 AM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "igsigs"
And since when does a bogus witness rate a 2 month media blackout?

Was it just to give the impression that they were working?



Dunno, JQK stated that he thought KJ was really believeing in the witness even though JQK had been sceptical.

Maybe KJ is pretty good at telling JQK believable stories?

KJ probably believes that wrestling is real ! !
What is she goung to do in Holland ?
Sell tulip bulbs door-to-door?
She looks too young to retire, but too stoooooooopid to work !
Sorry, I got her stuck on the stooooooooooooooopid.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: igsigs on June 30, 2006, 12:10:57 AM
...rant continued

And what was MF's big story that was 'good news'?

A lying, extorting witness is good news for who exactly?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on June 30, 2006, 12:10:58 AM
Flash from the past - what poster said these words in June 2005?

WHO SIGNED THE PAPERS?  WHO MAKES THE DECISION WHETHER TO ARREST SOMEONE?

This poster finally asked it enough times that I started researching Auban law and determined that person was KJ.  That was mid June 2005.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on June 30, 2006, 12:11:38 AM
Quote from: "igsigs"
...rant continued

And what was MF's big story that was 'good news'?

A lying, extorting witness is good news for who exactly?


For closing the case?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: igsigs on June 30, 2006, 12:11:51 AM
Big Hammer


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on June 30, 2006, 12:12:35 AM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Big Hammer


Yep, wasn't it you that also helped gather information for him??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: igsigs on June 30, 2006, 12:15:01 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "igsigs"
Big Hammer


Yep, wasn't it you that also helped gather information for him??


No. I wish. I just remember Hammer asking AG and NL that question. Wonder if he ever got the answer?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on June 30, 2006, 12:16:14 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Flash from the past - what poster said these words in June 2005?

WHO SIGNED THE PAPERS?  WHO MAKES THE DECISION WHETHER TO ARREST SOMEONE?

This poster finally asked it enough times that I started researching Auban law and determined that person was KJ.  That was mid June 2005.

Yup, door-to-door tulip bulbs ! ! !
Or they will give her a rubber stamp. And a stapler. And put the alphabet up on the wall for filing.
So, it was KJ who signed the papers for the security guards. Wonder who tipped off the media  ?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Anna on June 30, 2006, 12:16:16 AM
.
Here are a few things I have come to believe after all this time.  Just
opinions and my speculations, I have no proof of any of this, none:

I think the twenty times this happened before involved various other friends of Joran, not just the K2.  That is why so many were called in as witnesses.  They have participated at one time or another in this same activity, know the drill, etc.  Different times, different friends but they did this all the time and do not even think it wrong at all.

Normally, a hotel would be used but since Anita was away, Joran's apartment would be just fine, neighbors away, more buds to join in located close by.

KJ and Paulus have a VERY special relationship from sharing office space for so many years.  I wish she were really trying but I think she is just not passing on to the judge all the evidence, etc. that she does have.They have made it past the halfway point toward clearing all of even being suspects based on the time limits alone.  

Even if the case is closed, there will not be any cold case investigation as van der Straaten has already stated that no one was going to come behind and check his work, etc.  Participants have to be invited in to re-examine a cold case and that's not going to happen in this one.  Pretty much only the Dutch apply anyway and we know what they will find.  Same deal as all the forensics.   :?

So, we are really going to need a favorable ruling for the civil action, otherwise, I don't know what else will be done in Aruba.   :(


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: San on June 30, 2006, 12:17:25 AM
Quote from: "igsigs"
And since when does a bogus witness rate a 2 month media blackout?

Was it just to give the impression that they were working?

Or were they trying to think of a story to pin the murder on him.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Anna on June 30, 2006, 12:18:03 AM
Quote from: "igsigs"
...rant continued

And what was MF's big story that was 'good news'?

A lying, extorting witness is good news for who exactly?



JORAN, for one.    8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: igsigs on June 30, 2006, 12:19:52 AM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "igsigs"
And since when does a bogus witness rate a 2 month media blackout?

Was it just to give the impression that they were working?

Or were they trying to think of a story to pin the murder on him.


San! Get out of my head! That's exactly what i was thinkin after i posted. They just could not make it work in the end.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on June 30, 2006, 12:20:00 AM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "igsigs"
Big Hammer


Yep, wasn't it you that also helped gather information for him??


No. I wish. I just remember Hammer asking AG and NL that question. Wonder if he ever got the answer?


He never got an answer from them, he got one from me.  I found the Government website that said the prosecutor is in charge of the police. The prosecutor would decide who would be arrested/detained and who would not.  The prosecutor gives evidence to the Judge and the Judge desides if they will remain suspects.  We don't know what the prosecutor DOESN'T give the judge.  The Judge can only rule based on what he is given by the prosecutor.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on June 30, 2006, 12:23:22 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
.
Here are a few things I have come to believe after all this time.  Just
opinions and my speculations, I have no proof of any of this, none:

I think the twenty times this happened before involved various other friends of Joran, not just the K2.  That is why so many were called in as witnesses.  They have participated at one time or another in this same activity, know the drill, etc.  Different times, different friends but they did this all the time and do not even think it wrong at all.

Normally, a hotel would be used but since Anita was away, Joran's apartment would be just fine, neighbors away, more buds to join in located close by.

KJ and Paulus have a VERY special relationship from sharing office space for so many years.  I wish she were really trying but I think she is just not passing on to the judge all the evidence, etc. that she does have.They have made it past the halfway point toward clearing all of even being suspects based on the time limits alone.  

Even if the case is closed, there will not be any cold case investigation as van der Straaten has already stated that no one was going to come behind and check his work, etc.  Participants have to be invited in to re-examine a cold case and that's not going to happen in this one.  Pretty much only the Dutch apply anyway and we know what they will find.  Same deal as all the forensics.   :?

So, we are really going to need a favorable ruling for the civil action, otherwise, I don't know what else will be done in Aruba.   :(

I tend to agree. Sprong said something about having Holland look at it, but how is that done ?
I am not convinced that Natalee was at Joran's for any length of time. but it is just an opinion.
The ppl who have the evidence are the ones who participated in the cover up, so how are you going to wring that out of them ? They would shred, burn or flush rather than have legal experts in Holland look at what they did.
A pox on them all !  ! :twisted:  :evil:  :twisted:  :evil:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Anna on June 30, 2006, 12:25:32 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
[
He never got an answer from them, he got one from me.  I found the Government website that said the prosecutor is in charge of the police. The prosecutor would decide who would be arrested/detained and who would not.  The prosecutor gives evidence to the Judge and the Judge desides if they will remain suspects.  We don't know what the prosecutor DOESN'T give the judge.  The Judge can only rule based on what he is given by the prosecutor.


Even after a ruling is made, do we ever get to see what the judge was given?  Or in this case, what he was NOT given??  I just don't think KJ gives them any evidence.  Why didn't she correct the judge who would not issue a search warrant based on one of the younger brothers being home??  Why did she not get that search warrant?  

And couldn't think of any reason why the boys would lie?  I do not believe she is stupid.  She is playing the game and great will be her reward in Holland for doing so.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: igsigs on June 30, 2006, 12:27:33 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
The Judge can only rule based on what he is given by the prosecutor.

Great work Klaas. This is the part that bugs me the most. Damn this closed system, if we could see what info KJ presented to the judges that preceeded their confusing rulings i think this whole mess would be a lot clearer.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: spooky112483 on June 30, 2006, 12:27:51 AM
Here's what i'm thinking....we have two contradicting accounts here...
one: "she wanted to see my big house"
two: his lie about being an exchange student
these two can not reconcile because he can not front as an exchange student AND have a big family house on the island. So only ONE of these things actually happened. Now since we have many sources saying that #2 happened and since #1 has only come out of Joran's mouth, why would we believe #1???
We believe #1 because for him to admitt that they went to his house must be because   he knows someone else has placed them there that night and he needs to reconcile that.
So we can safely assume that they stopped outside his house that night and we can also assume that he was saying he was an exchange student.
What if he said to her not "do you want to see MY big house" but "do you want to see my FRIENDS big house"??
And if we believe Nat was drugged, she could have fallen for this and by the time they actually got to the house (after driving around in circles a bit) she would have been so out of it she wouldnt have known the differance.
Just thinking out loud....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on June 30, 2006, 12:28:53 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "klaasend"
[
He never got an answer from them, he got one from me.  I found the Government website that said the prosecutor is in charge of the police. The prosecutor would decide who would be arrested/detained and who would not.  The prosecutor gives evidence to the Judge and the Judge desides if they will remain suspects.  We don't know what the prosecutor DOESN'T give the judge.  The Judge can only rule based on what he is given by the prosecutor.


Even after a ruling is made, do we ever get to see what the judge was given?  Or in this case, what he was NOT given??  I just don't think KJ gives them any evidence.  Why didn't she correct the judge who would not issue a search warrant based on one of the younger brothers being home??  Why did she not get that search warrant?  

And couldn't think of any reason why the boys would lie?  I do not believe she is stupid.  She is playing the game and great will be her reward in Holland for doing so.


Dompig said that a search warrent for the entire VDS home was requested and denyed twice.  Why was it denyed?  What evidence was the Judge given?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: spooky112483 on June 30, 2006, 12:31:26 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Flash from the past - what poster said these words in June 2005?

WHO SIGNED THE PAPERS?  WHO MAKES THE DECISION WHETHER TO ARREST SOMEONE?

This poster finally asked it enough times that I started researching Auban law and determined that person was KJ.  That was mid June 2005.


behind but i wanted to guess...was it Hammer?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Anna on June 30, 2006, 12:32:28 AM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "klaasend"
The Judge can only rule based on what he is given by the prosecutor.

Great work Klaas. This is the part that bugs me the most. Damn this closed system, if we could see what info KJ presented to the judges that preceded their confusing rulings i think this whole mess would be a lot clearer.


I agree completely, Igsigs.  Remember Dave made one trip down just to get everybody "on the same page" and he said the Polis did not know what KJ knew who did not know what they knew, etc.  Something tells me the judge knows the least of all.

Whose fault is that?  She could have gotten that search warrant!   :evil: No one will ever convince me otherwise.  She knew the HI story was a lie but there she stood on the porch of the security guards at 6:30 am in person to oversee their arrest and the seizure of their belongings on the spot.  Nothing like the way the Sloots were treated.

She and Paulus must have been VERY CLOSE for her to have afforded him and his son all this preferential treatment.   :evil:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on June 30, 2006, 12:33:41 AM
Quote from: "spooky112483"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Flash from the past - what poster said these words in June 2005?

WHO SIGNED THE PAPERS?  WHO MAKES THE DECISION WHETHER TO ARREST SOMEONE?

This poster finally asked it enough times that I started researching Auban law and determined that person was KJ.  That was mid June 2005.


behind but i wanted to guess...was it Hammer?


Yes, it was Hammer!!  Hammer instictly knew at the very beginning that something was very wrong.  He wanted to know who made the decisions on who gets arrested and who doesn't..

To be honest, back then I was trying to believe in ALE.  I was giving them the benefit of the doubt.  Hammer asked so many times I finally gave in and searched.  Discovered the person in charge was KJ.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Tony on June 30, 2006, 12:35:17 AM
The Mill resorts is down to $85 a nite. This is where they would bring girls
from the casino.
I think that because paulus was alone and mom was still in holland, that the apartment was where they went first that night. FreddyA had spent the night before and might have been there.
We need  Queen Beatrix to intervene!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: spooky112483 on June 30, 2006, 12:36:11 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "spooky112483"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Flash from the past - what poster said these words in June 2005?

WHO SIGNED THE PAPERS?  WHO MAKES THE DECISION WHETHER TO ARREST SOMEONE?

This poster finally asked it enough times that I started researching Auban law and determined that person was KJ.  That was mid June 2005.


behind but i wanted to guess...was it Hammer?


Yes, it was Hammer!!  Hammer instictly knew at the very beginning that something was very wrong.  He wanted to know who made the decisions on who gets arrested and who doesn't..

To be honest, back then I was trying to believe in ALE.  I was giving them the benefit of the doubt.  Hammer asked so many times I finally gave in and searched.  Discovered the person in charge was KJ.


I remember that some people absolutly refused to believe (or admitt) that too :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on June 30, 2006, 12:36:13 AM
Quote from: "Tony"
The Mill resorts is down to $85 a nite. This is where they would bring girls
from the casino.
I think that because paulus was alone and mom was still in holland, that the apartment was where they went first that night. FreddyA had spent the night before and might have been there.
We need  Queen Beatrix to intervene!


What are the chances of that?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: igsigs on June 30, 2006, 12:38:03 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
 She knew the HI story was a lie but there she stood on the porch of the security guards at 6:30 am in person to oversee their arrest and the seizure of their belongings on the spot.  Nothing like the way the Sloots were treated.

Nutshell, Anna. There has never, ever, ever been a reasonable explanation for this action.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: spooky112483 on June 30, 2006, 12:38:09 AM
Quote from: "sb"
For any of our Alabama Monkeys that haven't heard yet...

2 of this state's biggest THUGS will be donning pinstripes soon!

Don Siegelman and Richard Scrushy are both CONVICTED on multiple counts involving fraud and extortion today.


I've been doing the happy dance all day over this :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: spooky112483 on June 30, 2006, 12:43:43 AM
Quote from: "Tony"
The Mill resorts is down to $85 a nite. This is where they would bring girls
from the casino.
I think that because paulus was alone and mom was still in holland, that the apartment was where they went first that night. FreddyA had spent the night before and might have been there.
We need  Queen Beatrix to intervene!


Is it possible they went to the apartment first and then to the Mill? Is there enough time for rape to take place at both locations plus the deposal of her body after she dies at the Mill?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Tony on June 30, 2006, 12:46:54 AM
If there was a concerted effort to contact Queen Beatrix maybe she would apply some pressure. She needs to know  mre about Natalee and her innocence lost because of "pimps'.  
KJ and PVS weren't quite as close as PVS/JVDS  and PVS/BV Paulus interviewed in Holland and said he was not  "interrogated" just lightly questioned.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on June 30, 2006, 12:52:50 AM
Quote from: "Tony"
If there was a concerted effort to contact Queen Beatrix maybe she would apply some pressure. She needs to know  mre about Natalee and her innocence lost because of "pimps'.  
KJ and PVS weren't quite as close as PVS/JVDS  and PVS/BV Paulus interviewed in Holland and said he was not  "interrogated" just lightly questioned.


I actually wrote her once after seeking advice from a very good British friend who has access to QE, on how to do that and the way in which to address her, how to approach it.  I got one of those sorta "canned" replies.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on June 30, 2006, 12:53:25 AM
Quote from: "Tony"
If there was a concerted effort to contact Queen Beatrix maybe she would apply some pressure. She needs to know  mre about Natalee and her innocence lost because of "pimps'.  
KJ and PVS weren't quite as close as PVS/JVDS  and PVS/BV Paulus interviewed in Holland and said he was not  "interrogated" just lightly questioned.


Who is BV?  I remember the lightly questioned comment.  Personally, I think Paulus was detained to give him access to Joran.  Make sure Joran didn't crack.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on June 30, 2006, 01:02:39 AM
Quote from: "Tony"
The Mill resorts is down to $85 a nite. This is where they would bring girls
from the casino.
I think that because paulus was alone and mom was still in holland, that the apartment was where they went first that night. FreddyA had spent the night before and might have been there.
We need  Queen Beatrix to intervene!

What nite ?
Saturday?
Sunday?
Monday?
Where?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on June 30, 2006, 01:05:29 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "klaasend"
The Judge can only rule based on what he is given by the prosecutor.

Great work Klaas. This is the part that bugs me the most. Damn this closed system, if we could see what info KJ presented to the judges that preceded their confusing rulings i think this whole mess would be a lot clearer.


I agree completely, Igsigs.  Remember Dave made one trip down just to get everybody "on the same page" and he said the Polis did not know what KJ knew who did not know what they knew, etc.  Something tells me the judge knows the least of all.

Whose fault is that?  She could have gotten that search warrant!   :evil: No one will ever convince me otherwise.  She knew the HI story was a lie but there she stood on the porch of the security guards at 6:30 am in person to oversee their arrest and the seizure of their belongings on the spot.  Nothing like the way the Sloots were treated.

She and Paulus must have been VERY CLOSE for her to have afforded him and his son all this preferential treatment.   :evil:


Ya got me convinced.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on June 30, 2006, 01:05:41 AM
Quote from: "Anna"


Even if the case is closed, there will not be any cold case investigation as van der Straaten has already stated that no one was going to come behind and check his work, etc.  


The Twitty family filed to be a civil participant in a criminal proceding.  I think this was the first step to obtain the case files at the end of the 2 year period if charges are not brought against J2K.

KJ is in a tight spot at the moment.  If she turns over the case files to the Curacao Judge to decide the case in PvdS's civil trial, there will be a duplicate record of the case files.  Will both sets of files conveniently lose the same documents prior to turning them over to the H/T families?  Or will they suddenly make a new law that prohibits the family from obtaining the files?  

Are all Dutch Judges and Prosecutors corrupt no matter where in the Kingdom of the Netherlands they work?  Then why did Paulus fail out of the judge-in-training program?  He should have been elevated to be on their Supreme Court, IMO.  

The Netherlands cabinet  currently in power is resigning.  It seems the NL is as much turmoil as is Aruba.  Are they going down the tubes together?
How did the Hague get to be Court for International Law?

I don't think its just the ALE who move slow.  It took the Hague 4 years to try Milosevic for the Balkan War Atrocities including genocide. Unfortunately Milosevic died while being detained before they could finish the trial, otherwise his trial would still be going on now and probably for many years to come.

What's up with these Dutchies?  They move as slow as the zombies that inhabit the nederworld.  Do they call a coven to create new laws yo obsfucate  and replace inconvenient laws as the situation dictates?  Do the publish their law books in a hard bound manner, or are the laws in loose leef 3 ring binders?

Did you know that the age of consent for a sexual encounter in the NL is only 12 years of age.   They sell hardcore porn tapes in their grocery stores, and have porn shows on Early Primetime TV during the "Family Hour".  I'm not even going to try to figure out what THAT means........Whooaa

And we are told we don't understand their system.  Their system is they have no system.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on June 30, 2006, 01:10:41 AM
My dogs are acting up tonight, barking and getting into things they shouldn't be doing.  I gotta go be alpha dog and settle them done before the wake the neighbors and tear the house down..

Good night ya'll.  Sweet Dreams.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on June 30, 2006, 01:13:33 AM
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
Quote from: "Anna"


Even if the case is closed, there will not be any cold case investigation as van der Straaten has already stated that no one was going to come behind and check his work, etc.  


The Twitty family filed to be a civil participant in a criminal proceding.  I think this was the first step to obtain the case files at the end of the 2 year period if charges are not brought against J2K.

KJ is in a tight spot at the moment.  If she turns over the case files to the Curacao Judge to decide the case in PvdS's civil trial, there will be a duplicate record of the case files.  Will both sets of files conveniently lose the same documents prior to turning them over to the H/T families?  Or will they suddenly make a new law that prohibits the family from obtaining the files?  

Are all Dutch Judges and Prosecutors corrupt no matter where in the Kingdom of the Netherlands they work?  Then why did Paulus fail out of the judge-in-training program?  He should have been elevated to be on their Supreme Court, IMO.  

The Netherlands cabinet  currently in power is resigning.  It seems the NL is as much turmoil as is Aruba.  Are they going down the tubes together?
How did the Hague get to be Court for International Law?

I don't think its just the ALE who move slow.  It took the Hague 4 years to try Milosevic for the Balkan War Atrocities including genocide. Unfortunately Milosevic died while being detained before they could finish the trial, otherwise his trial would still be going on now and probably for many years to come.

What's up with these Dutchies?  They move as slow as the zombies that inhabit the nederworld.  Do they call a coven to create new laws yo obsfucate  and replace inconvenient laws as the situation dictates?  Do the publish their law books in a hard bound manner, or are the laws in loose leef 3 ring binders?

Did you know that the age of consent for a sexual encounter in the NL is only 12 years of age.   They sell hardcore porn tapes in their grocery stores, and have porn shows on Early Primetime TV during the "Family Hour".  I'm not even going to try to figure out what THAT means........Whooaa

And we are told we don't understand their system.  Their system is they have no system.


Q's
If the civil case of PVDS is complete, what happens to the records?
Are they public ? or a big secret ?
.
If they ( KJ ) closes the Natalee case, can they get the records sooner than the 2 years ?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on June 30, 2006, 01:21:33 AM
Good evening everyone!  What's new?  What was the info on Greta tonight?  I missed the first showing (softball game)...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on June 30, 2006, 01:27:58 AM
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Good evening everyone!  What's new?  What was the info on Greta tonight?  I missed the first showing (softball game)...

JQK was on Greta and confirmed that the Columbian witness has admitting he lied about the whole thing.

Edited to add:  Hi Third!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on June 30, 2006, 01:30:36 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Good evening everyone!  What's new?  What was the info on Greta tonight?  I missed the first showing (softball game)...

JQK was on Greta and confirmed that the Columbian witness has admitting he lied about the whole thing.

Edited to add:  Hi Third!!


Thanks!  And, Hi Klass!!  ;)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on June 30, 2006, 01:39:50 AM
Goodnight All - see you tomorrow!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on June 30, 2006, 01:40:37 AM
Third - Spooky is still signed in.  I'm sure she'll join you shortly  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: nonesuche on June 30, 2006, 01:42:25 AM
Sunfreak you raise all the right questions, the issue is larger than just Holland in some respects however. I can remember being in London in 1973 with my mother at the Savoy Hotel, and seeing frontal nudity on many TV shows as well as words and phrases still banned by our censors for daytime TV today.

The US is much more provincial than many countries in northern Europe, what is different is that Holland makes a living in a larger way from pornography, prostitution,  and also other white collar crimes such as internet hacking. There is a certain level of acceptance there you cannot find in many other countries.

Holland also has the highest rate of incest for northern Europe currently, but to be fair the US ranks in the top ten as well globally. They simply do not have the same sensibilities we do regarding the protection against exploiting women and children, nor does Aruba.

I do however think Aruba is the red headed stepchild that Holland can't even control, hence the threats recently to renege on the charter to allow Aruba eventual independence. It's their island of misfits, Holland has allowed some of their problem children in Holland to ship out to Aruba, and also to join forces with some of the underbelly that already existed there.

I also suspect much of the illegal activity on or around Aruba lines the pockets of Queen Beatrix's robes, if not directly then indirectly.

The picture is far too ugly for there to be any real resolution as we understand justice and resolution. It is a huge landscape of sex, lies and videotapes.

Janssen cut her deal with Holland early on, I don't think she's beholding to Paulus but likely sees him as the ball and chain she has to carry, to toe the party line. I also think she's had free reign to 'write this story' as she sees fit, one chapter at a time, just as long as she delivered the desired outcome of no trial and no admission of guilt.

Klaas is framing it out correctly, it is one huge picture of deceit, cover-up, and corruption. Bigger than we'd like to know or hope to understand.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Hat on June 30, 2006, 01:46:11 AM
Even Kowgirls Get the Blues?

Nice work, Karin, you made the team. Take a look around, you are one of them now, no mistake. Must be a great feeling. Stay on the island with the rest of them. Call Angela, Nadira, Rubberlegs and a few more and daisy chain on the Wyndham lobby carpet if you like,  but worry just a little. You know what they are capable of. Maybe some day something really terrible happens to your family and…well you know.

Try Holland. No problem. Friends, people you meet, colleagues…you square right up and look ‘em dead in the eye with your cold bitch stare because you would sell out their babies just to make your day go smoother.

Some cringing, self effacing little weasel offers you a ride home from say an Abba tribute or whatever, you hop right in. Meet up with a big friendly blockhead at a fun bar someplace and let him get you a drink. Drink deep, Karin. You earned it.

By the way, is there a way you guys recognize each other? I mean is it like werewolves or something? Just wondered, it’s hard for us, look how long you played it out.

Anyway, thanks again and we’ll be looking for you. You have a great future… any kids?

Hat


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on June 30, 2006, 01:49:21 AM
Hat - great to see you!

Do you have any feel for the NY case?  How do you feel JQK's chances are of getting the case heard in NY?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Hat on June 30, 2006, 01:53:25 AM
Hey Klaas, sorry for the re hash post, but I still feel that way.
As to the NY case, I do not give it a huge chance. I base that on the time element shown by the judge. My thinking is if the judge had it as a NY case the ruling would have come down already. May be a huge stack of files on that judges desk though.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: sb on June 30, 2006, 01:54:08 AM
I wonder with what Kelly said tonight, if the posts that were quoted today by sharon were accurate... about the 60-day NY case time limit and all, and the jurisdictional deal as well. He does NOT sound like he has the thing in the bag like we were thinking today.

And hi spooky, wherever you are!

Maybe with all our Monkeys getting back from their vacations, we can start getting down to BUSINESS again!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on June 30, 2006, 01:55:33 AM
Quote from: "Hat"
Hey Klaas, sorry for the re hash post, but I still feel that way.
As to the NY case, I do not give it a huge chance. I base that on the time element shown by the judge. My thinking is if the judge had it as a NY case the ruling would have come down already. May be a huge stack of files on that judges desk though.


Yep, you are probably right but I'm hoping it's the stack of files instead.  I was also wondering if she was waiting to find out if this witness was real.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on June 30, 2006, 01:57:25 AM
Ok, now I'm really calling it a night!  

Hat - always nice having you drop in, you should do so more often!

Goodnight All!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Hat on June 30, 2006, 01:57:52 AM
I guess I could give the NY case a little better chance than my favorite team, Portugal, in that Copa Mundial Kickball thingy.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: sb on June 30, 2006, 01:59:41 AM
IF that 60-day thing is correct though, it could mean that the judge wants discovery to go forward WITHOUT having to make a ruling... no precedent is established (or violated) and Beth gets her day in court against Joran et al.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: spooky112483 on June 30, 2006, 02:09:08 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Third - Spooky is still signed in.  I'm sure she'll join you shortly  :wink:


yeah hey i was just catching up :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: spooky112483 on June 30, 2006, 02:12:52 AM
Quote from: "Hat"
Even Kowgirls Get the Blues?

Nice work, Karin, you made the team. Take a look around, you are one of them now, no mistake. Must be a great feeling. Stay on the island with the rest of them. Call Angela, Nadira, Rubberlegs and a few more and daisy chain on the Wyndham lobby carpet if you like,  but worry just a little. You know what they are capable of. Maybe some day something really terrible happens to your family and…well you know.

Try Holland. No problem. Friends, people you meet, colleagues…you square right up and look ‘em dead in the eye with your cold bitch stare because you would sell out their babies just to make your day go smoother.

Some cringing, self effacing little weasel offers you a ride home from say an Abba tribute or whatever, you hop right in. Meet up with a big friendly blockhead at a fun bar someplace and let him get you a drink. Drink deep, Karin. You earned it.

By the way, is there a way you guys recognize each other? I mean is it like werewolves or something? Just wondered, it’s hard for us, look how long you played it out.

Anyway, thanks again and we’ll be looking for you. You have a great future… any kids?

Hat


I LOVE you Hat!!!!!!!!
Hope you are doing well :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: spooky112483 on June 30, 2006, 02:14:59 AM
Hi to you too SB if you're still here


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on June 30, 2006, 02:16:03 AM
OK.  I'm back...

What'd I miss??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Anna on June 30, 2006, 02:16:03 AM
.
I'm pretty sure at the end of two years the HT's would get an empty file folder that has only a few coffee stains and some Frosted Flake crumbs in it.   :evil: Paulus and KJ would have that thing scrubbed so clean by them as to be perfectly useless.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Hat on June 30, 2006, 02:16:05 AM
Thanks Spooky, been working at a newspaper and contributing on a book project but take the temperature on the board as able. Feel great for a guy that had a root canal today. Yikes.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: A's Fever on June 30, 2006, 02:18:07 AM
Does anyone have the link to Arubasilence?  When I tried Arubasilence.com I got Arubavacations . . .


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Anna on June 30, 2006, 02:19:11 AM
.

Hat,
Yikes!  Feeling must not be back yet.   :shock: Voice of experience saying those things CAN hurt.  Hope you are fast asleep so you don't feel it if yours is going to do that.   :(

SB,
Did no one transcribe Greta tonight?  I think mostly JQK said the witness was lying and implied it was good the judge was taking so long.  Greta was sort of iffy about whether or not that was a good sign.

HEY SPOOKY and Third!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on June 30, 2006, 02:19:16 AM
Quote from: "A's Fever"
Does anyone have the link to Arubasilence?  When I tried Arubasilence.com I got Arubavacations . . .


You have to use (2) S's...

www.arubassilence.com


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on June 30, 2006, 02:20:37 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
.

HEY SPOOKY and Third!


Hey Anna!  How are you this fine evening/morning?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: A's Fever on June 30, 2006, 02:20:45 AM
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "A's Fever"
Does anyone have the link to Arubasilence?  When I tried Arubasilence.com I got Arubavacations . . .


You have to use (2) S's...

www.arubassilence.com


Okay, thanks so much!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Anna on June 30, 2006, 02:22:23 AM
.
I'm doing well, Third, thanks for asking.  Working a little at night because it is going to be one hundred humid degrees tomorrow here in Dixie.  I can't take that kind of heat any more!

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Anna on June 30, 2006, 02:23:36 AM
.

SB,
Thanks for the information on our Alabama mafia's convictions today.  I hope Aruba saw that.  What a novel idea!  Prosecuting corrupt government officials.  
 :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Anna on June 30, 2006, 02:27:44 AM
.
There is more evidence of which we are aware and have seen over the last year than many successful cases are taken to court and tried with.  I just don't believe NONE of it panned out.  So much I wish now I had saved but at the beginning, who knew??  Who knew ALE was corrupt and KJ was going to sabatoge her own case and they were all going to lie cheat and steal to cover this??   :shock:

So we didn't keep it then forums crashed and the media pulled down articles and photos, etc. and now much of it is gone.  At the time we read things and now we are not sure if we remember correctly or not.   :?:
And I think that is all by design.  This is how it is supposed to end, not with a bang but a whimper as they wear us down and our memories blur.

Not a very good plan considering the internet, however.  We will just have to make sure we are the Last Man Standing in this.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Anna on June 30, 2006, 02:34:49 AM
.
One last thought then it's the Monkey Bunkey for me.

I never believed Joran retracted his confession.  It was retracted FOR him by Jan van der Straaten.  I do not recall where I read or heard or saw it but when it happened there was an account of Dompig taking over and the announcement that Natalee was dead was made.

Then van der Straaten pulled whatever strings he holds which would appear to be plenty. Less than 48 hours later he was back in office.   :shock:  He went over the confession, said it was made after hours and just threw it out.  Said Joran's rights were violated to get it as it is illegal in their system to question detainees after a certain time and this was taken after that time.  Sort of like our own laws concerning terrorist are now.   :roll: So then POOF, no more confession.

Does anyone remember the cop who was part of obtaining that confession?  I believe Dompig was present but there was somebody else instrumental in getting it.  Maybe he would talk??  Just a thought, grasping at straws as am disappointed about the witness.   :cry:


Goodnight, all, sweet summertime dreams. . . . . . .

Anna walking. . . . .
LOL @ Hat!   8)   Always loved that line.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on June 30, 2006, 02:40:38 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
.
One last thought then it's the Monkey Bunkey for me.

I never believed Joran retracted his confession.  It was retracted FOR him by Jan van der Straaten.  I do not recall where I read or heard or saw it but when it happened there was an account of Dompig taking over and the announcement that Natalee was dead was made.

Then van der Straaten pulled whatever strings he holds which would appear to be plenty. Less than 48 hours later he was back in office.   :shock:  He went over the confession, said it was made after hours and just threw it out.  Said Joran's rights were violated to get it as it is illegal in their system to question detainees after a certain time and this was taken after that time.  Sort of like our own laws concerning terrorist are now.   :roll: So then POOF, no more confession.

Does anyone remember the cop who was part of obtaining that confession?  I believe Dompig was present but there was somebody else instrumental in getting it.  Maybe he would talk??  Just a thought, grasping at straws as am disappointed about the witness.   :cry:


Goodnight, all, sweet summertime dreams. . . . . . .

Anna walking. . . . .
LOL @ Hat!   8)   Always loved that line.


Well, I guess I'll get the lights then...;)

Goodnight Anna!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Hotshot on June 30, 2006, 03:13:52 AM
Hi all, sorry so late.  Just checking in to say hello, and good night.  I see the Columbian got it after all.....Too bad, so sorry.  I didn't think it fit too well.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: spooky112483 on June 30, 2006, 03:27:35 AM
Quote from: "Hat"
Thanks Spooky, been working at a newspaper and contributing on a book project but take the temperature on the board as able. Feel great for a guy that had a root canal today. Yikes.


those are rough. i had one when i was little. feel better sweetie


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: the big hammer on June 30, 2006, 05:11:08 AM
WHO Signed Those Papers?

Yes.  The basis for "Failure to Perform" investigation and ultimate prosecution exists.

SOMEBODY SIGNED PAPERS to arrest Johns and Jones; and somebody signed papers to make jk2 WITNESSES (vs suspects on 5/30/05).

And yes, I was among those who asked this question early on.  I recall much good-natured chiding about same and was called my "signature quest" -- a well worded double entendre.

Where's my abduction charge?

HAT!! Is that you?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Jerry from Ohio on June 30, 2006, 06:08:41 AM
SB  and by the below comment you meant ?
  It would seem that you have a somewhat lower opinion of the rest of that have been here.
and we were  doing what we thought was (Getting down to business)
obviousley you don't think that we are quite up to the project ?
  If this was just a poor choice of wording just say so and that will be that, and that even us common monkeys can understand. (BTW I personally do not believe there ANY common monkeys ) we are ALL great!

Jerry from Ohio

Maybe with all our Monkeys getting back from their vacations, we can start getting down to BUSINESS again![/quote]


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Peaches on June 30, 2006, 07:02:44 AM
Good morning.  I'm back on page 10.

See ya when I get caught up!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Jerry from Ohio on June 30, 2006, 07:05:01 AM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Good morning.  I'm back on page 10.

See ya when I get caught up!


   Good Morning Peaches ya sweet sweet Lady  you <g>

  Jerry from Ohio  :+)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Easywriter on June 30, 2006, 07:10:54 AM
Good Morning All!

What's new?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on June 30, 2006, 07:16:52 AM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "klaasend"
A very helpful person, VMS, just emailed me a couple of better photos of Angela:

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/angelaM1.jpg)


I'm not real good at guessing ages, but that lady looks rather young to me.

Scuba seemed to be very proud of being the mother of a 20 yr old and her description past activities seemed to age her to me to at least be in her late 40's. the girl pictured looks a lot younger to me.

Old pic? or Different lady from Scuba?


Well, Carnut, I can assure you when I had a 20-year-old son I looked no older nor near as fat as this cat.


 :lol:  :wink:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Easywriter on June 30, 2006, 07:24:21 AM
Found this one another board.

Heh Heh.

Well, walkman, since MedleyRely has been exposed I fear that we won't get any updates from Anita.


Anyone know what it means?  It just sorta caught my attention.   :P


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Leslie on June 30, 2006, 07:38:08 AM
Diario     June 30, 2006
http://www.diarioaruba.com/diabierna/frontpage/index.html

BonDia   June 29, 2006
http://www.cspnv.com/archivo/pdf/29/A-29-06-2006.pdf
http://www.cspnv.com/archivo/pdf/29/B-29-06-2006.pdf
http://www.cspnv.com/archivo/pdf/29/C-29-06-2006.pdf

Amigoe
http://www.amigoe.com/english/

Papiamentu online translator:
http://papiamentu.donamaro.nl/


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: KatzHome on June 30, 2006, 07:44:17 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "igsigs"
Anybody get a good read on the Greta/JQK civil discussion? They were joking around and i could not tell if the judge's slowness was being referred to as good or bad.

JQK was attempting to suggest it was a good thing and Greta was pressing him about it.  JQK said he really didn't know if it was a good thing but he preferred to think of it as good.  I think Greta was trying to see if JQK had any inside info regarding how the judge might decide.


That's how I took it too, Klaas.

And, good morning everyone!  I'm only a few pages behind....  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Peaches on June 30, 2006, 08:11:20 AM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Found this one another board.

Heh Heh.

Well, walkman, since MedleyRely has been exposed I fear that we won't get any updates from Anita.


Anyone know what it means?  It just sorta caught my attention.   :P


Anita is Medley's new best friend.   :roll:  :roll:  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Easywriter on June 30, 2006, 08:18:57 AM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Found this one another board.

Heh Heh.

Well, walkman, since MedleyRely has been exposed I fear that we won't get any updates from Anita.


Anyone know what it means?  It just sorta caught my attention.   :P


Anita is Medley's new best friend.   :roll:  :roll:  :roll:


Yeah, I heard her call-in Dana's show and read a few of her posts.  Was wondering what was meant by "exposed" in that message.  Was hoping she had gone the way of a few of the other fanatics.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: terryd270 on June 30, 2006, 08:20:22 AM
Good morning everyone,

Easy how was MedleyRely exposed?  I would see her post on Rogers site and she was very much  infatuation or fixation on everything Sloot.  I know I wouldn't want her near my kid but she never hid the obsessive-compulsive behaviour about the sloots..  


Sharon, do you know someone by the name Shirley Tootle (IRS)  in Miami ?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: terryd270 on June 30, 2006, 08:23:53 AM
Easy,

I thought that maybe that was another reason why Roger brought his site down was because of her obsessive-compulsiveness on the Sloots.. So you don't know why they used the term exposed?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: terryd270 on June 30, 2006, 08:25:11 AM
Well the weekend is here, is anyone doing anything special?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Peaches on June 30, 2006, 08:28:24 AM
Terry, I think someone else can probably explain it better.  Posts are on FOB (freedom of blog.com) re the exposure.  

Some days she lives in PA, sometimes Las Vegas, sometimes Little Rock...origin of the letter with PVDS' DNA on it.  Can you say MAIL FRAUD?  Sure.  I knew you could.

I'm sure someone else has a clearer explanation.  She's clearly gone off the deep end.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: terryd270 on June 30, 2006, 08:32:49 AM
Peaches,

Thanks for the info, and I could see that.. I hope your feeling good today and your strength is returning..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Mere on June 30, 2006, 08:33:25 AM
Quote from: "Leslie"
Diario     June 30, 2006
http://www.diarioaruba.com/diabierna/frontpage/index.html

BonDia   June 29, 2006
http://www.cspnv.com/archivo/pdf/29/A-29-06-2006.pdf
http://www.cspnv.com/archivo/pdf/29/B-29-06-2006.pdf
http://www.cspnv.com/archivo/pdf/29/C-29-06-2006.pdf

Amigoe
http://www.amigoe.com/english/

Papiamentu online translator:
http://papiamentu.donamaro.nl/


Good morning friends.... :)

Leslie...thank you for bringing these links each morning... :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Peaches on June 30, 2006, 08:36:59 AM
Quote from: "terryd270"
Peaches,

Thanks for the info, and I could see that.. I hope your feeling good today and your strength is returning..


I'm feeling great..... just in time for round #2 of maintenance chemo on July 5.  The good news is they don't put you on maintenance unless you're disease-free after the initial 6 rounds of big gun chemo.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Mere on June 30, 2006, 08:41:02 AM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "terryd270"
Peaches,

Thanks for the info, and I could see that.. I hope your feeling good today and your strength is returning..


I'm feeling great..... just in time for round #2 of maintenance chemo on July 5.  The good news is they don't put you on maintenance unless you're disease-free after the initial 6 rounds of big gun chemo.


Peaches...that sounds like such good news....is maintenance chemo IV or oral meds...?  Mere


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: terryd270 on June 30, 2006, 08:44:30 AM
Peaches,

I'm glad that all your energy is recharged and your ready..  I look forward to seeing you when I come on..  I need to do some work but have a great weekend..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Peaches on June 30, 2006, 08:49:20 AM
Quote from: "MeMere"
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "terryd270"
Peaches,

Thanks for the info, and I could see that.. I hope your feeling good today and your strength is returning..


I'm feeling great..... just in time for round #2 of maintenance chemo on July 5.  The good news is they don't put you on maintenance unless you're disease-free after the initial 6 rounds of big gun chemo.


Peaches...that sounds like such good news....is maintenance chemo IV or oral meds...?  Mere


IV.  Eats a big portion of the day but thanks to the Benadryl given up front, it makes for a nice nap.  If I get the IV started by 9, I'm done by about 2:30 in the afternoon.  Could be worse.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Peaches on June 30, 2006, 08:50:03 AM
Quote from: "terryd270"
Peaches,

I'm glad that all your energy is recharged and your ready..  I look forward to seeing you when I come on..  I need to do some work but have a great weekend..


Back at ya, my friend.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Jerry from Ohio on June 30, 2006, 09:04:14 AM
Peaches  please let me also wish you good fortune and I will send up smoke  (Native American way of  saying prayers ) for you and i also enjoy seeing you online and do appriciate your comments and  thoughts on this a very puzzelling case you have a good head on your shoulders lady  <g>  
   Jerry from Ohio  your new friend  





Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "MeMere"
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "terryd270"
Peaches,

Thanks for the info, and I could see that.. I hope your feeling good today and your strength is returning..


I'm feeling great..... just in time for round #2 of maintenance chemo on July 5.  The good news is they don't put you on maintenance unless you're disease-free after the initial 6 rounds of big gun chemo.


Peaches...that sounds like such good news....is maintenance chemo IV or oral meds...?  Mere


IV.  Eats a big portion of the day but thanks to the Benadryl given up front, it makes for a nice nap.  If I get the IV started by 9, I'm done by about 2:30 in the afternoon.  Could be worse.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Mere on June 30, 2006, 09:06:14 AM
Went over to the Lounge and found JA's note and link about the flooding at her home.....do we have any other folks in that area...?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Easywriter on June 30, 2006, 09:08:04 AM
Quote from: "terryd270"
Well the weekend is here, is anyone doing anything special?


A little sleeping, a little eating and a whole lot of TV watching for me.  Too blasted hot to want to get out and do much.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: KatzHome on June 30, 2006, 09:10:58 AM
Quote from: "terryd270"
Well the weekend is here, is anyone doing anything special?


Hi Terry ~ I'm working...  Ain't THAT special!  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Peaches on June 30, 2006, 09:13:23 AM
Thanks, Jerry.  

I think we need some horsey pics in the lounge.  You have pintos and what else?  Morgans?  

I remember seeing the Bud Clydesdales at the Safeway when I was young.  I was so impressed.  Their feet were bigger than my head.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: terryd270 on June 30, 2006, 09:13:58 AM
KatzHome,

When working at the office, I like to take my food and eat out by the lake, its kinda like taking a little vacation from work.. Well I'm off to actually do some work..

td


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: KatzHome on June 30, 2006, 09:14:59 AM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "MeMere"
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "terryd270"
Peaches,

Thanks for the info, and I could see that.. I hope your feeling good today and your strength is returning..


I'm feeling great..... just in time for round #2 of maintenance chemo on July 5.  The good news is they don't put you on maintenance unless you're disease-free after the initial 6 rounds of big gun chemo.


Peaches...that sounds like such good news....is maintenance chemo IV or oral meds...?  Mere


IV.  Eats a big portion of the day but thanks to the Benadryl given up front, it makes for a nice nap.  If I get the IV started by 9, I'm done by about 2:30 in the afternoon.  Could be worse.


{{{hugs}}}  Peaches ~ I'm glad that you've made it maintenance...  how long will this part of it go on for?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Peaches on June 30, 2006, 09:15:25 AM
Quote from: "terryd270"
KatzHome,

When working at the office, I like to take my food and eat out by the lake, its kinda like taking a little vacation from work.. Well I'm off to actually do some work..

td


Be careful you don't end up being lunch for a gator.  You know how tasty peeping squirrels are! :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Peaches on June 30, 2006, 09:16:39 AM
Katz, 12 rounds.  Every four weeks.  July 5 will be #2 of the 12.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: KatzHome on June 30, 2006, 09:17:21 AM
Quote from: "terryd270"
KatzHome,

When working at the office, I like to take my food and eat out by the lake, its kinda like taking a little vacation from work.. Well I'm off to actually do some work..

td


When the Marina was still open and not buried under the MGM ~ and the Tropicana golf course still there ~ we'd go hang out on the golf course when on extended breaks ~ that was a sweet job...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: KatzHome on June 30, 2006, 09:18:40 AM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "terryd270"
KatzHome,

When working at the office, I like to take my food and eat out by the lake, its kinda like taking a little vacation from work.. Well I'm off to actually do some work..

td


Be careful you don't end up being lunch for a gator.  You know how tasty peeping squirrels are! :shock:


 :lol: Good comeback, Peaches!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: KatzHome on June 30, 2006, 09:19:51 AM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Katz, 12 rounds.  Every four weeks.  July 5 will be #2 of the 12.


That's quite a bit ~ hugs ~ but this year will soon pass, Peaches...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: KatzHome on June 30, 2006, 09:20:54 AM
OK ~ so, we can forget about the beach story ~ or at least I am...

For me, it all goes back to Natalee died at the VDsloot compound ~ and I happen to think that it was Paulus who made the final decision to just let Natalee die...  I think Joran ran to Paulus for help when Natalee was dying ~ and that was the advice that Paulus gave.

I think perhaps that one to four of Paulus' friends helped get rid of Natalee's body and cover-up the crime by having the investigation botched from the beginning.

Or maybe it was Lorenzo who helped take Natalee's body out to sea.  Remember when we talked about him ~ and he's supposedly a recluse, living on money from his mother's sold business ~ I happen to think that he's a drug dealer too ~ and it's said that he has a boat.

Maybe Paulus' friends only helped steer the investigation away from the VDsloot family.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Kimmy53 on June 30, 2006, 09:22:40 AM
Good Morning Monkeys!

Hi Katz, terryd, Jerry from Ohio, Peaches, MeMere, Easy, and anyone else I may have missed.  TGIF!!!!

Does anyone think that maybe ALE will keep with their MO and  drop a big one on the 4th of July???????


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: KatzHome on June 30, 2006, 09:30:41 AM
Good morning Kimmy ~ I don't know....  .....................


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Peaches on June 30, 2006, 09:31:03 AM
Hi Kimmy.

I caught the tail end of Greta last nite.  She said something like "join us tomorrow nite from New York City".

Wonder what that's all about.  Surely she wouldn't have advance notice of Judge Kapnick's ruling.

Maybe nothing.  Maybe not.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: KatzHome on June 30, 2006, 09:36:33 AM
Does anyone still have a link to the Fox Greta Natalee special where Beth took Greta into Natalee's bedroom?

I just went to the Fox video page ~ and there's only 12 videos on it ~ and that's not one of them...

Or does anyone happen to have that video on their hard drive?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: thik on June 30, 2006, 09:54:33 AM
Mornin,,all

I have a misinformation question:

If this lying Columbian revealed this alledged cable, etc.  Weren't we ''informed'' that it was being sent to NFI for testing and so on.  So,, is a lying Columbian 'that' convincing to ALE ? Or is ALE lying  along with the lying Columbian....''.empty words and a few meaningless gestures''...


God Bless Natalee, Wherever She Is....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Easywriter on June 30, 2006, 09:58:03 AM
Thanks for the tip on the FOB thread. lol  That is a very interesting read!  There is some cwazy chit that goes on surrounding this story!

I don't think the story really matters.  The same crazy BS would be happening if Mickey Mouse was accused of taking an eraser to Minnie Mouse!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Kimmy53 on June 30, 2006, 10:03:30 AM
Quote from: "thik"
Mornin,,all

I have a misinformation question:

If this lying Columbian revealed this alledged cable, etc.  Weren't we ''informed'' that it was being sent to NFI for testing and so on.  So,, is a lying Columbian 'that' convincing to ALE ? Or is ALE lying  along with the lying Columbian....''.empty words and a few meaningless gestures''...


God Bless Natalee, Wherever She Is....


thik - this is what I don't get - IF - supposedly this witness was not believable in the first place - why would they send this "evidence" off for testing - heck - the stuff that really needs testing has been disgarded (belt etc)

I also thought it was said that the witness was believable because he knew details that made him seem to be telling the truth.  Will it come up that he fabricated that evidence too? Or could he just not produce this evidence?

I just don't know - Like which LIAR do you believe?  Neither?  ALE just spins the story the way that best suits.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: San on June 30, 2006, 10:09:51 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "klaasend"
[
He never got an answer from them, he got one from me.  I found the Government website that said the prosecutor is in charge of the police. The prosecutor would decide who would be arrested/detained and who would not.  The prosecutor gives evidence to the Judge and the Judge desides if they will remain suspects.  We don't know what the prosecutor DOESN'T give the judge.  The Judge can only rule based on what he is given by the prosecutor.


Even after a ruling is made, do we ever get to see what the judge was given?  Or in this case, what he was NOT given??  I just don't think KJ gives them any evidence.  Why didn't she correct the judge who would not issue a search warrant based on one of the younger brothers being home??  Why did she not get that search warrant?  

And couldn't think of any reason why the boys would lie?  I do not believe she is stupid.  She is playing the game and great will be her reward in Holland for doing so.

Dompig said that a search warrent for the entire VDS home was requested and denyed twice.  Why was it denyed?  What evidence was the Judge given?

I am behind.  Wasn't the search warrant denied because it was Paulus' good friend the judge who denied it.  Wasn't this same judge that was at Paulus' house or Paulus was playing golf with him.  They could have produced a video of Natalee at the VDS home and the search warrant would have still been denied by this judge.  KJ is corrupt she is in charge of the investigation.  She even stabbed her own fellow prosecutor in the back by not following up with Koen's story.  This girl quit the case because of KJ.  KJ's actions were done on purpose.  Who does KJ answer to?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on June 30, 2006, 10:10:00 AM
Hey Monks!

Been on the phone with our phone service provider for 1 1/2 hours.

They put The I in Incompetence! :roll:

Boss on his way to Europe for a two week vacation and NO VOICEMAIL!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on June 30, 2006, 10:11:28 AM
Quote from: "terryd270"
Good morning everyone,

Easy how was MedleyRely exposed?  I would see her post on Rogers site and she was very much  infatuation or fixation on everything Sloot.  I know I wouldn't want her near my kid but she never hid the obsessive-compulsive behaviour about the sloots..  


Sharon, do you know someone by the name Shirley Tootle (IRS)  in Miami ?


She was exposed as living in Little Rock, AR not Pittsburg... and possibly as the one that sent the fake letter around...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on June 30, 2006, 10:14:53 AM
Goodmorning All - I have a ton of work to today so I'll be lurking and working again.  I am monitoring the board and will post durring breaks.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on June 30, 2006, 10:18:51 AM
Quote from: "Kimmy53"
Good Morning Monkeys!

Hi Katz, terryd, Jerry from Ohio, Peaches, MeMere, Easy, and anyone else I may have missed.  TGIF!!!!

Does anyone think that maybe ALE will keep with their MO and  drop a big one on the 4th of July???????


:::RAISING MY HAND::::

Just catching up.... HEY Y'all....[/color]


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: blah on June 30, 2006, 10:19:42 AM
Quote from: "terryd270"
Well the weekend is here, is anyone doing anything special?


I'm going to Florida tomorrow morning.  Gonna watch the Space Shuttle launch (cant get bigger fireworks than that!) and then spend the week with mickey mouse.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on June 30, 2006, 10:20:58 AM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Thanks for the tip on the FOB thread. lol  That is a very interesting read!  There is some cwazy chit that goes on surrounding this story!

I don't think the story really matters.  The same crazy BS would be happening if Mickey Mouse was accused of taking an eraser to Minnie Mouse!


And this is what kills me the most.... the poor Keese family completely were run off of the Internet for trying to find information about their daughter and Jessica's Lunsford's dad also endured some very vile hatred... why do people hate the greiving? It really angers me how nasty people can get...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on June 30, 2006, 10:22:06 AM
You know guys I been thinking.....

the ALE did what they did, tourism is sufferig, probably can't be restored to what it once was before Nat.

They really have no reason to solve this case.  There is nothing in it for them now.

It's not like they are decent and have morals and values to adhere to....they just are concentrating all of their efforts on maintaining a cover up.

 :cry: can you tell I am in a bad mood?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Anna on June 30, 2006, 10:22:30 AM
Quote from: "San"
[I am behind.  Wasn't the search warrant denied because it was Paulus' good friend the judge who denied it.  Wasn't this same judge that was at Paulus' house or Paulus was playing golf with him.  They could have produced a video of Natalee at the VDS home and the search warrant would have still been denied by this judge.  KJ is corrupt she is in charge of the investigation.  She even stabbed her own fellow prosecutor in the back by not following up with Koen's story.  This girl quit the case because of KJ.  KJ's actions were done on purpose.  Who does KJ answer to?


San,
I don't think the judge could very well say I am denying this cause I am Paulus good friend.  He said he was denying it because one of the younger brothers was home, etc.  Had to give a reason for his denial.  KJ could have said the brother was NOT there, etc. and stood firm on getting that search warrant.

She sure got one for the security guards and to rough them up in the process.  Even a judge should at least appear logical so if she had countered his arguments, maybe he would have caved in and permitted it?  I don't know but don't have the impression she even tried.

I have to wonder why.  Can she not appeal to the judge to reverse his refusal?  Even their system must allow for that.  It is the fact she did get warrant for the security guards on far less that I find so troubling.

I think her remark about not going in like Cowboys reflects her attitude that from the start she never intended to make any waves in this cover up.  How could she threaten Beth to stop the investigation entirely, actually think it was Jug she threatened with this.  Can she just on a whim not investigate?  She didn't even try and it started with her failure to order forensics taken on Joran and the Kelpoe brothers.  As HAMMER stated again last night, it is SHE who tells the ALE what to do.  Or in this case, what not to do.  

First no forensics on those last seen with Natalee, something just unheard of in this day and age then no search warrant of the Sloot residence.  Both these made a realistic investigation impossible and both of them come right back to Karin Jaanssen.  JMO, of course.

. :x


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on June 30, 2006, 10:23:38 AM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "terryd270"
Well the weekend is here, is anyone doing anything special?


I'm going to Florida tomorrow morning.  Gonna watch the Space Shuttle launch (cant get bigger fireworks than that!) and then spend the week with mickey mouse.



We saw a shuttle launch a couple years ago - exciting - and pack your sunscreen and your umbrella!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Peaches on June 30, 2006, 10:24:50 AM
http://www.foxnews.com/ontherecord/index.html

Katz, is this what you're looking for?  

You have to scroll down to the pic of Beth......


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on June 30, 2006, 10:24:55 AM
Katz - if you are still around, here is the video link you were looking for. Scroll down to the "Frozen in Time" link:

http://www.foxnews.com/ontherecord/


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: blah on June 30, 2006, 10:25:31 AM
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "terryd270"
Well the weekend is here, is anyone doing anything special?


I'm going to Florida tomorrow morning.  Gonna watch the Space Shuttle launch (cant get bigger fireworks than that!) and then spend the week with mickey mouse.



We saw a shuttle launch a couple years ago - exciting - and pack your sunscreen and your umbrella!


where did you watch from?  I was thinking about watching from coacoa beach but we are probably not going to get there early enough to make it down into that mess so we will probably watch from titusville.  I have a friend that worked at nasa and he said its alot easier to get in and out of titusville.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Nut44x4 on June 30, 2006, 10:25:37 AM
Had to chuckle while reading this link on visitaruba.com, especially #2 under rules for teens...   :roll:
http://bb.visitaruba.com/showthread.php?t=2247
notice the date of this post......


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: thik on June 30, 2006, 10:26:12 AM
Quote from: "Kimmy53"
Quote from: "thik"
Mornin,,all

I have a misinformation question:

If this lying Columbian revealed this alledged cable, etc.  Weren't we ''informed'' that it was being sent to NFI for testing and so on.  So,, is a lying Columbian 'that' convincing to ALE ? Or is ALE lying  along with the lying Columbian....''.empty words and a few meaningless gestures''...


God Bless Natalee, Wherever She Is....


thik - this is what I don't get - IF - supposedly this witness was not believable in the first place - why would they send this "evidence" off for testing - heck - the stuff that really needs testing has been disgarded (belt etc)

I also thought it was said that the witness was believable because he knew details that made him seem to be telling the truth.  Will it come up that he fabricated that evidence too? Or could he just not produce this evidence?

I just don't know - Like which LIAR do you believe?  Neither?  ALE just spins the story the way that best suits.



If ''bullshit were nickels'' they'd all be millionaires !!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Peaches on June 30, 2006, 10:28:23 AM
Thik, you're reading my mind.  

Geez, I finally find a link to be helpful and did it at the same time as  Klaas.  WOOHOO!  I'm feeling like a big monkey now.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on June 30, 2006, 10:28:27 AM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "terryd270"
Well the weekend is here, is anyone doing anything special?


I'm going to Florida tomorrow morning.  Gonna watch the Space Shuttle launch (cant get bigger fireworks than that!) and then spend the week with mickey mouse.



We saw a shuttle launch a couple years ago - exciting - and pack your sunscreen and your umbrella!


where did you watch from?  I was thinking about watching from coacoa beach but we are probably not going to get there early enough to make it down into that mess so we will probably watch from titusville.  I have a friend that worked at nasa and he said its alot easier to get in and out of titusville.


BIL's Father in Law lives by Merritt Island - Watched from there!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on June 30, 2006, 10:34:12 AM
O/T -
another anniverisary of some missing and the ensuing cover up....

but does anyone else wonder why the wife took the money?  the family sure didn't ....

(FP post...)  but it just really surprises me that she did that...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Kimmy53 on June 30, 2006, 10:34:55 AM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Thanks for the tip on the FOB thread. lol  That is a very interesting read!  There is some cwazy chit that goes on surrounding this story!

I don't think the story really matters.  The same crazy BS would be happening if Mickey Mouse was accused of taking an eraser to Minnie Mouse!


And this is what kills me the most.... the poor Keese family completely were run off of the Internet for trying to find information about their daughter and Jessica's Lunsford's dad also endured some very vile hatred... why do people hate the greiving? It really angers me how nasty people can get...


MrsR - I agree - I cannot even imagine HOW people can be this way.  It never comes into my thoughts.  Instead of being angry at the people that committ these horrific crimes, they are angry at the victims and victims families.  There is no sense in that.  Are people really that miserable that they need to trash those that are hurting the most.  Does doing that make them feel better?  It sickens me beyond words.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: blah on June 30, 2006, 10:40:14 AM
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "terryd270"
Well the weekend is here, is anyone doing anything special?


I'm going to Florida tomorrow morning.  Gonna watch the Space Shuttle launch (cant get bigger fireworks than that!) and then spend the week with mickey mouse.



We saw a shuttle launch a couple years ago - exciting - and pack your sunscreen and your umbrella!


where did you watch from?  I was thinking about watching from coacoa beach but we are probably not going to get there early enough to make it down into that mess so we will probably watch from titusville.  I have a friend that worked at nasa and he said its alot easier to get in and out of titusville.


BIL's Father in Law lives by Merritt Island - Watched from there!



sweet, how hard did the ground shake, how loud was it?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on June 30, 2006, 10:41:32 AM
Quote from: "Nut44x4"
Had to chuckle while reading this link on visitaruba.com, especially #2 under rules for teens...   :roll:
http://bb.visitaruba.com/showthread.php?t=2247
notice the date of this post......


Hi,  I already knew what was on this link beforehand, because it was discussed over a year ago.  That was the start of the quick fixes by the tourism people, but it really doesn't support the safety that Aruba was to have had, no crime, happy happy.  Yes, you are right.... :roll:  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: KatzHome on June 30, 2006, 10:42:51 AM
Quote from: "Peaches"
http://www.foxnews.com/ontherecord/index.html

Katz, is this what you're looking for?  

You have to scroll down to the pic of Beth......


Yes it is, Peaches ~ thank you very, very much!  {{{hugs}}}


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on June 30, 2006, 10:46:53 AM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Found this one another board.

Heh Heh.

Well, walkman, since MedleyRely has been exposed I fear that we won't get any updates from Anita.


Anyone know what it means?  It just sorta caught my attention.   :P


Anita is Medley's new best friend.   :roll:  :roll:  :roll:


Yeah, I heard her call-in Dana's show and read a few of her posts.  Was wondering what was meant by "exposed" in that message.  Was hoping she had gone the way of a few of the other fanatics.


Easy, Paulus got a letter from someone who pretended to be Natalee, post-stamped from Arkansas.  The letter was turned over and the DNA found on it was only that of Paulus.  MedleyRelay said she was from the Northeast. I found an old post of hers and an address from Little  Rock, Arkansas.  She was the one who had sent Paulus the letter from LR, Ark.  She slipped up one time and she was caught.  As far as exposing herself, suffice it to say, "all criminals eventually slip up."


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on June 30, 2006, 10:49:06 AM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "terryd270"
Well the weekend is here, is anyone doing anything special?


I'm going to Florida tomorrow morning.  Gonna watch the Space Shuttle launch (cant get bigger fireworks than that!) and then spend the week with mickey mouse.



We saw a shuttle launch a couple years ago - exciting - and pack your sunscreen and your umbrella!


where did you watch from?  I was thinking about watching from coacoa beach but we are probably not going to get there early enough to make it down into that mess so we will probably watch from titusville.  I have a friend that worked at nasa and he said its alot easier to get in and out of titusville.


BIL's Father in Law lives by Merritt Island - Watched from there!



sweet, how hard did the ground shake, how loud was it?


We felt the heat and had our fingers in our ears - I brought earplugs but gave them to the little kids that were there.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: thik on June 30, 2006, 10:51:53 AM
blah....

If you have ear plugs, same em....

You'll need em for Mickey, and the ever popular "" It's A Small Small World''

I haven't been down there in three years, and that tune STILLl haunts me...  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Easywriter on June 30, 2006, 10:56:44 AM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Found this one another board.

Heh Heh.

Well, walkman, since MedleyRely has been exposed I fear that we won't get any updates from Anita.


Anyone know what it means?  It just sorta caught my attention.   :P


Anita is Medley's new best friend.   :roll:  :roll:  :roll:


Yeah, I heard her call-in Dana's show and read a few of her posts.  Was wondering what was meant by "exposed" in that message.  Was hoping she had gone the way of a few of the other fanatics.


Easy, Paulus got a letter from someone who pretended to be Natalee, post-stamped from Arkansas.  The letter was turned over and the DNA found on it was only that of Paulus.  MedleyRelay said she was from the Northeast. I found an old post of hers and an address from Little  Rock, Arkansas.  She was the one who had sent Paulus the letter from LR, Ark.  She slipped up one time and she was caught.  As far as exposing herself, suffice it to say, "all criminals eventually slip up."


I was just reading that thread at FOB and I loved it when she started whining about being “exposed” and wanted to know why her and not Granny Toad and Easywriter, because we seem to be diametrically opposed in FOB’s general theories.

Chock-Full-O-Nuts!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: friend of monkeys on June 30, 2006, 10:58:16 AM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Thik, you're reading my mind.  

Geez, I finally find a link to be helpful and did it at the same time as  Klaas.  WOOHOO!  I'm feeling like a big monkey now.



careful or u might get a tiara up your a$$.

its a beautiful day to be a monkey
sunshine on cape cod..finally

is it my :roll:  puter or are we all naked today???


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on June 30, 2006, 10:59:55 AM
Nekked as Jaybirds!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on June 30, 2006, 11:01:31 AM
Quote from: "friend of monkeys"
Quote from: "Peaches"
Thik, you're reading my mind.  

Geez, I finally find a link to be helpful and did it at the same time as  Klaas.  WOOHOO!  I'm feeling like a big monkey now.



careful or u might get a tiara up your a$$.

its a beautiful day to be a monkey
sunshine on cape cod..finally

is it my :roll:  puter or are we all naked today???


FOM!!!  honey hush! there are no tirara A$$ shoving contests over here!!  

we're all naked...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: friend of monkeys on June 30, 2006, 11:04:24 AM
Easy, Paulus got a letter from someone who pretended to be Natalee, post-stamped from Arkansas.  The letter was turned over and the DNA found on it was only that of Paulus.  MedleyRelay said she was from the Northeast. I found an old post of hers and an address from Little  Rock, Arkansas.  She was the one who had sent Paulus the letter from LR, Ark.  She slipped up one time and she was caught.  As far as exposing herself, suffice it to say, "all criminals eventually slip up."[/quote]


i believe this but still locking doors and looking twice


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: blah on June 30, 2006, 11:07:13 AM
Quote from: "thik"
blah....

If you have ear plugs, same em....

You'll need em for Mickey, and the ever popular "" It's A Small Small World''

I haven't been down there in three years, and that tune STILLl haunts me...  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Peaches on June 30, 2006, 11:11:20 AM
OT- Judge tossed the Couey confession.  Don't get me started.  I didn't get enough sleep and I'm kinda cranky.  Go ahead and let that animal out.  Someone will get him and it won't be soon enough.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: San on June 30, 2006, 11:12:32 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "San"
[I am behind.  Wasn't the search warrant denied because it was Paulus' good friend the judge who denied it.  Wasn't this same judge that was at Paulus' house or Paulus was playing golf with him.  They could have produced a video of Natalee at the VDS home and the search warrant would have still been denied by this judge.  KJ is corrupt she is in charge of the investigation.  She even stabbed her own fellow prosecutor in the back by not following up with Koen's story.  This girl quit the case because of KJ.  KJ's actions were done on purpose.  Who does KJ answer to?

San,
I don't think the judge could very well say I am denying this cause I am Paulus good friend.  He said he was denying it because one of the younger brothers was home, etc.  Had to give a reason for his denial.  KJ could have said the brother was NOT there, etc. and stood firm on getting that search warrant.

She sure got one for the security guards and to rough them up in the process.  Even a judge should at least appear logical so if she had countered his arguments, maybe he would have caved in and permitted it?  I don't know but don't have the impression she even tried.

I have to wonder why.  Can she not appeal to the judge to reverse his refusal?  Even their system must allow for that.  It is the fact she did get warrant for the security guards on far less that I find so troubling.

I think her remark about not going in like Cowboys reflects her attitude that from the start she never intended to make any waves in this cover up.  How could she threaten Beth to stop the investigation entirely, actually think it was Jug she threatened with this.  Can she just on a whim not investigate?  She didn't even try and it started with her failure to order forensics taken on Joran and the Kelpoe brothers.  As HAMMER stated again last night, it is SHE who tells the ALE what to do.  Or in this case, what not to do.  

First no forensics on those last seen with Natalee, something just unheard of in this day and age then no search warrant of the Sloot residence.  Both these made a realistic investigation impossible and both of them come right back to Karin Jaanssen.  JMO, of course.

. :x

Anna,
 :lol: What I meant is that the judge wasn't going to rule in favor of the search because he is friends with Paulus.  They just needed an excuse to not issue the warrant.  Quite frankly it was a poor excuse to say the reason way the warrant wasn't issued is because the kids were home.  All they had to do is make sure the kids weren't there when they searched the house.  Could you imagine if that was done in the United States.  All the drug dealers would be hiding their stash in their kids room knowing they won't search it because the kids are home :roll:   That is the dumbest and weakest excuse I've ever heard of.

KJ got pissed because Jug confronted her about why the entire residence wasn't searched and her answer I believe was "because we couldn't".  What the hell kind of answer is that.  She was also pissed because she knew Jug knew the truth and she threatened him.  Just like Van der Straaten threatened them to shut the case down.  We have a bunch of people on that island abusing power.  Don't forget little Rudy Croes's threat to Beth "we will shut her up".  I still will like to know how he was going to do that.  To me that sounded like a death threat coming from the Justice Minister himself.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Peaches on June 30, 2006, 11:12:49 AM
It's a small world after all
It's a small world after all
It's a small world after all
It's a small, small world.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: friend of monkeys on June 30, 2006, 11:14:50 AM
Quote from: "Peaches"
OT- Judge tossed the Couey confession.  Don't get me started.  I didn't get enough sleep and I'm kinda cranky.  Go ahead and let that animal out.  Someone will get him and it won't be soon enough.



unreal
and all so "by the book"
until the next victim


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on June 30, 2006, 11:16:12 AM
Quote from: "Peaches"
OT- Judge tossed the Couey confession.  Don't get me started.  I didn't get enough sleep and I'm kinda cranky.  Go ahead and let that animal out.  Someone will get him and it won't be soon enough.


I freaking hope so..... these judges are useless to society IMO


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: KatzHome on June 30, 2006, 11:16:20 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Katz - if you are still around, here is the video link you were looking for. Scroll down to the "Frozen in Time" link:

http://www.foxnews.com/ontherecord/


Thank you too, Klaas ~ I just saw your post ~ thank you!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: KatzHome on June 30, 2006, 11:17:32 AM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Thik, you're reading my mind.  

Geez, I finally find a link to be helpful and did it at the same time as  Klaas.  WOOHOO!  I'm feeling like a big monkey now.


 :lol: I don't think I'll ever grow up to be a big monkey....  :oops:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Peaches on June 30, 2006, 11:18:41 AM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "Peaches"
OT- Judge tossed the Couey confession.  Don't get me started.  I didn't get enough sleep and I'm kinda cranky.  Go ahead and let that animal out.  Someone will get him and it won't be soon enough.


I freaking hope so..... these judges are useless to society IMO


Bill O'Reilly is going to go ballistic over this as  well he should.  I'm livid.  And I bet I'm not the only one.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: friend of monkeys on June 30, 2006, 11:18:49 AM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "Peaches"
OT- Judge tossed the Couey confession.  Don't get me started.  I didn't get enough sleep and I'm kinda cranky.  Go ahead and let that animal out.  Someone will get him and it won't be soon enough.


I freaking hope so..... these judges are useless to society IMO


cops r no better.
useless as tits on a bull.....

see u monkeys later

ty all


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: San on June 30, 2006, 11:19:01 AM
Quote from: "Peaches"
OT- Judge tossed the Couey confession.  Don't get me started.  I didn't get enough sleep and I'm kinda cranky.  Go ahead and let that animal out.  Someone will get him and it won't be soon enough.

If he gets let out and I was the father of the girl Couey would not be alive.  I would hunt him down and bury him alive like he did to his daughter.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: thik on June 30, 2006, 11:19:33 AM
Quote from: "Peaches"
It's a small world after all
It's a small world after all
It's a small world after all
It's a small, small world.




God Help Us aLL !!!!!! :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Peaches on June 30, 2006, 11:20:39 AM
Quote from: "thik"
Quote from: "Peaches"
It's a small world after all
It's a small world after all
It's a small world after all
It's a small, small world.




God Help Us aLL !!!!!! :lol:  :lol:


I knew you would love that.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: friend of monkeys on June 30, 2006, 11:20:45 AM
Quote from: "Peaches"
It's a small world after all
It's a small world after all
It's a small world after all
It's a small, small world.



yes....if anyone here hasn't seen the movie "CRASH"
highly reccomend it

now quit singin that song!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: San on June 30, 2006, 11:21:04 AM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "Peaches"
OT- Judge tossed the Couey confession.  Don't get me started.  I didn't get enough sleep and I'm kinda cranky.  Go ahead and let that animal out.  Someone will get him and it won't be soon enough.

I freaking hope so..... these judges are useless to society IMO

Bill O'Reilly is going to go ballistic over this as  well he should.  I'm livid.  And I bet I'm not the only one.

I can't even look at Couey he makes me sick.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Peaches on June 30, 2006, 11:21:51 AM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "Peaches"
OT- Judge tossed the Couey confession.  Don't get me started.  I didn't get enough sleep and I'm kinda cranky.  Go ahead and let that animal out.  Someone will get him and it won't be soon enough.

I freaking hope so..... these judges are useless to society IMO

Bill O'Reilly is going to go ballistic over this as  well he should.  I'm livid.  And I bet I'm not the only one.

I can't even look at Couey he makes me sick.


I think the only way he could look good would be in the crosshairs.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on June 30, 2006, 11:24:22 AM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "Peaches"
OT- Judge tossed the Couey confession.  Don't get me started.  I didn't get enough sleep and I'm kinda cranky.  Go ahead and let that animal out.  Someone will get him and it won't be soon enough.

I freaking hope so..... these judges are useless to society IMO

Bill O'Reilly is going to go ballistic over this as  well he should.  I'm livid.  And I bet I'm not the only one.

I can't even look at Couey he makes me sick.


The difference in Couey and Joran, is Joran had a plaid shirt.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Red on June 30, 2006, 11:24:55 AM
Front Page Post:

John Couey Confession Tossed out by Judge in Jessica Lunsford Rape & Murder


http://tinyurl.com/gghxo

Although the police really screwed up, it just infuriates
me that this scumbag gets more rights afforded to him.

(http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/fun-images/John_20Couey_small.jpg)

Than this precious soul.

(http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/fun-images/Jessica_20lunsford_small.jpg)

God bless her dad Mark in the work he does for exploited children
and God Bless Jessica.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Anna on June 30, 2006, 11:26:15 AM
.
San,
Just ignore me--I am in my Blame KJ Mode that I cycle through about once a week.   :evil: I want to call her names but Klaas will just edit them out.   :evil: I wonder if she attended the around the pool meeting to explain no body/no crime or if she and Paulus just sorted that all out at the courthouse or by phone.   :evil: She seems to be lying to JQK a great deal.  Telling him she is not leaving at the end of the year when Jossy says her replacement is already on the island.   :evil:

Guess you get my drift--she is at the Top on My List Today for whatever reasons.. . . . . . .

 :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Anna on June 30, 2006, 11:29:04 AM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "thik"
Quote from: "Peaches"
It's a small world after all
It's a small world after all
It's a small world after all
It's a small, small world.




God Help Us aLL !!!!!! :lol:  :lol:


I knew you would love that.


PEACHES!!

Have you no mercy??  What are you thinking???  Next you will be posting that BabyBack Ribs song just to finish us off.

 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: KatzHome on June 30, 2006, 11:31:31 AM
Thank you both, Klaas and Peaches!
(http://i27.photobucket.com/albums/c186/MarysKid/ThankYouDuck.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: SunnyinTX on June 30, 2006, 11:33:06 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
.
San,
Just ignore me--I am in my Blame KJ Mode that I cycle through about once a week.   :evil: I want to call her names but Klaas will just edit them out.   :evil: I wonder if she attended the around the pool meeting to explain no body/no crime or if she and Paulus just sorted that all out at the courthouse or by phone.   :evil: She seems to be lying to JQK a great deal.  Telling him she is not leaving at the end of the year when Jossy says her replacement is already on the island.   :evil:

Guess you get my drift--she is at the Top on My List Today for whatever reasons.. . . . . . .

 :wink:


Good Morning Monks!  Anna...try a little Southern Cussing....that girl is from the other side of the tracks and plays out behind the barn with the animals...Bless her Heart :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Anna on June 30, 2006, 11:33:10 AM
.
Things I Am Not Going To Do This Morning:

Read that article about Couey.  My BP won't take it!
Look at the vid of Natalee's room--always makes me cry!
Explain why my relatives of DUTCH ancestry have the nerve to have Dutch names.  I sent a joke to some people and one of my relatives has a name very close to the van der Sloots.  If anybody has anything more to say to me about that, my email is in my profile!

BRING IT ON!!!

 :twisted:


Anna walking for now. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: KatzHome on June 30, 2006, 11:33:33 AM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "Peaches"
OT- Judge tossed the Couey confession.  Don't get me started.  I didn't get enough sleep and I'm kinda cranky.  Go ahead and let that animal out.  Someone will get him and it won't be soon enough.


I freaking hope so..... these judges are useless to society IMO


Bill O'Reilly is going to go ballistic over this as  well he should.  I'm livid.  And I bet I'm not the only one.


The only thing I can say is that on some interview I heard that they have enough evidence that his confession isn't necessary...

I hope this guy gets the death penalty.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on June 30, 2006, 11:33:43 AM
Red, more the reason why GWB should have dumped all those WJC judges that he did not.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Peaches on June 30, 2006, 11:35:30 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "thik"
Quote from: "Peaches"
It's a small world after all
It's a small world after all
It's a small world after all
It's a small, small world.




God Help Us aLL !!!!!! :lol:  :lol:


I knew you would love that.


PEACHES!!

Have you no mercy??  What are you thinking???  Next you will be posting that BabyBack Ribs song just to finish us off.

 8)


Well, we're even now!  I hate that commercial.  

One day in the car with my daughter, the radio was on "her" station.  I got "Back that Thang Up" stuck in my head.  Good grief.   Another day it was "Grillz".

"Smile for me Daddy
Whatcha lookin' at"


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: KatzHome on June 30, 2006, 11:38:07 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
.
Things I Am Not Going To Do This Morning:

Read that article about Couey.  My BP won't take it!
Look at the vid of Natalee's room--always makes me cry!
Explain why my relatives of DUTCH ancestry have the nerve to have Dutch names.  I sent a joke to some people and one of my relatives has a name very close to the van der Sloots.  If anybody has anything more to say to me about that, my email is in my profile!

BRING IT ON!!!

 :twisted:


Anna walking for now. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .


I'm looking for my tripod ~ I want a copy of that video ~ so I'm going to record it with my camera...  I hope the memory card is big enough for it all ~ I can take a little over 5 minutes of movie with it ~ yeah, there's bigger cards around ~ but I haven't bought one...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: San on June 30, 2006, 11:38:24 AM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "Peaches"
OT- Judge tossed the Couey confession.  Don't get me started.  I didn't get enough sleep and I'm kinda cranky.  Go ahead and let that animal out.  Someone will get him and it won't be soon enough.

I freaking hope so..... these judges are useless to society IMO

Bill O'Reilly is going to go ballistic over this as  well he should.  I'm livid.  And I bet I'm not the only one.

I can't even look at Couey he makes me sick.


The difference in Couey and Joran, is Joran had a plaid shirt.

Exactly Tyler.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on June 30, 2006, 11:38:25 AM
Quote from: "SunnyinTX"
Quote from: "Anna"
.
San,
Just ignore me--I am in my Blame KJ Mode that I cycle through about once a week.   :evil: I want to call her names but Klaas will just edit them out.   :evil: I wonder if she attended the around the pool meeting to explain no body/no crime or if she and Paulus just sorted that all out at the courthouse or by phone.   :evil: She seems to be lying to JQK a great deal.  Telling him she is not leaving at the end of the year when Jossy says her replacement is already on the island.   :evil:

Guess you get my drift--she is at the Top on My List Today for whatever reasons.. . . . . . .

 :wink:




Good Morning Monks!  Anna...try a little Southern Cussing....that girl is from the other side of the tracks and plays out behind the barn with the animals...Bless her Heart :wink:


I like that! Hello MTWS!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Peaches on June 30, 2006, 11:38:30 AM
Quote from: "KatzHome"
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "Peaches"
OT- Judge tossed the Couey confession.  Don't get me started.  I didn't get enough sleep and I'm kinda cranky.  Go ahead and let that animal out.  Someone will get him and it won't be soon enough.


I freaking hope so..... these judges are useless to society IMO


Bill O'Reilly is going to go ballistic over this as  well he should.  I'm livid.  And I bet I'm not the only one.


The only thing I can say is that on some interview I heard that they have enough evidence that his confession isn't necessary...

I hope this guy gets the death penalty.


The death penalty will still give this scumbag 10-15 more years of life than he gave Jessica.  They need to speed up the appeals process to reduce the time elapsed between sentencing and execution.  Put in the fast lane and reserve it for pieces of crap like Couey.  

I bet he won't last long in the pokey.  I heard they hate child molesters.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: thik on June 30, 2006, 11:38:52 AM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "thik"
Quote from: "Peaches"
It's a small world after all
It's a small world after all
It's a small world after all
It's a small, small world.




God Help Us aLL !!!!!! :lol:  :lol:


I knew you would love that.


PEACHES!!

Have you no mercy??  What are you thinking???  Next you will be posting that BabyBack Ribs song just to finish us off.

 8)


Well, we're even now!  I hate that commercial.  

One day in the car with my daughter, the radio was on "her" station.  I got "Back that Thang Up" stuck in my head.  Good grief.   Another day it was "Grillz".

"Smile for me Daddy
Whatcha lookin' at"




Life is good... My 14 yr old G-daughter put ''My HumpS'' on my cell  for a ringtone..  I'm her ''cool'' grampa''    8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on June 30, 2006, 11:41:01 AM
Quote from: "KatzHome"
Quote from: "Peaches"
Thik, you're reading my mind.  

Geez, I finally find a link to be helpful and did it at the same time as  Klaas.  WOOHOO!  I'm feeling like a big monkey now.


 :lol: I don't think I'll ever grow up to be a big monkey....  :oops:


You already are!!!  LOL....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: SunnyinTX on June 30, 2006, 11:41:16 AM
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"
Quote from: "SunnyinTX"




Good Morning Monks!  Anna...try a little Southern Cussing....that girl is from the other side of the tracks and plays out behind the barn with the animals...Bless her Heart :wink:


I like that! Hello MTWS!


Hi FM!!!   I was gonna says she screws :wink:  with the animals...but Klaas might have blipped me!  LOL


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Peaches on June 30, 2006, 11:41:43 AM
Thik, another one of the daughter's faves!  

Can anybody spell bananas without hearing the Gwen Stefani song in their head?  

I should talk though.  I learned to spell Massachusetts watching Captain Kangaroo spell it on the magic drawing board.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Kimmy53 on June 30, 2006, 11:41:53 AM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "KatzHome"
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "Peaches"
OT- Judge tossed the Couey confession.  Don't get me started.  I didn't get enough sleep and I'm kinda cranky.  Go ahead and let that animal out.  Someone will get him and it won't be soon enough.


I freaking hope so..... these judges are useless to society IMO


Bill O'Reilly is going to go ballistic over this as  well he should.  I'm livid.  And I bet I'm not the only one.


The only thing I can say is that on some interview I heard that they have enough evidence that his confession isn't necessary...

I hope this guy gets the death penalty.


The death penalty will still give this scumbag 10-15 more years of life than he gave Jessica.  They need to speed up the appeals process to reduce the time elapsed between sentencing and execution.  Put in the fast lane and reserve it for pieces of crap like Couey.  

I bet he won't last long in the pokey.  I heard they hate child molesters.


They aught to start at the piece of sh**'s toes, and trim off 1/4" douse with alcohol, trim another 1/4", douse with alcohol, all the way up... Make him suffer - and for a very long time....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: SunnyinTX on June 30, 2006, 11:42:48 AM
Quote from: "Peaches"


The death penalty will still give this scumbag 10-15 more years of life than he gave Jessica.  They need to speed up the appeals process to reduce the time elapsed between sentencing and execution.  Put in the fast lane and reserve it for pieces of crap like Couey.  

I bet he won't last long in the pokey.  I heard they hate child molesters.


I wish someone would give her father 5 minutes alone with him....then put his sorry ass in general population.....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Kimmy53 on June 30, 2006, 11:43:42 AM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Thik, another one of the daughter's faves!  

Can anybody spell bananas without hearing the Gwen Stefani song in their head?  

I should talk though.  I learned to spell Massachusetts watching Captain Kangaroo spell it on the magic drawing board.


Ya gotta love Mr. Green Jeans, Mr. Moose and Bunny Rabbit!!! :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Anna on June 30, 2006, 11:43:54 AM
.
OK, Peaches,
I came back even mad about my email just to tell you that


NOW YOU KNOW WHERE FASHION SITS!

Bomp
Bomp
Bomp


.

PUTTIN' ON THE RITZ!!

.


 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on June 30, 2006, 11:43:59 AM
Quote from: "SunnyinTX"
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"
Quote from: "SunnyinTX"




Good Morning Monks!  Anna...try a little Southern Cussing....that girl is from the other side of the tracks and plays out behind the barn with the animals...Bless her Heart :wink:


I like that! Hello MTWS!


Hi FM!!!   I was gonna says she screws :wink:  with the animals...but Klaas might have blipped me!  LOL


Klaas posted that she will be busy today so you can cuss and spit and Lala's not here either!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: terryd270 on June 30, 2006, 11:44:45 AM
Kimmy,

I think you mean the trimming should be done with a really dull rusted butter knife.   :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: SunnyinTX on June 30, 2006, 11:45:01 AM
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"
Quote from: "SunnyinTX"
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"
Quote from: "SunnyinTX"




Good Morning Monks!  Anna...try a little Southern Cussing....that girl is from the other side of the tracks and plays out behind the barn with the animals...Bless her Heart :wink:


I like that! Hello MTWS!


Hi FM!!!   I was gonna says she screws :wink:  with the animals...but Klaas might have blipped me!  LOL


Klaas posted that she will be busy today so you can cuss and spit and Lala's not here either!


HOT DAMN!!!   :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on June 30, 2006, 11:45:01 AM
Our courts seem to have been screwing up all week.
One judged has ruled that pedophiles can live in and hang around areas where young children play and that it would be unconstitutional if they could not.

Another group decide military tribunals violate the rights of Bin Laden's right hand man and other violent animals who want to destroy America and her future.

This judge decides to throw out the Couey confession.

I am beginning to think al Quaeda might be an arm of our judiciary system, bent on taking this country down.

Many men and women fought and died to make this country a kinder, gentler place to live and now the judges have the power to make it as barbaric as what we see in Eurasia.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Peaches on June 30, 2006, 11:45:24 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
.
OK, Peaches,
I came back even mad about my email just to tell you that

NOW YOU KNOW WHERE FASHION SITS!

Bomp
Bomp
Bomp

PUTTIN' ON THE RITZ!!

 8)


LMAO!  Our chorus sang that song on a show.  We had sparkly tophats and lots of choreography.  

My fave version is from Young Frankenstein.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Easywriter on June 30, 2006, 11:47:06 AM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Thik, another one of the daughter's faves!  

Can anybody spell bananas without hearing the Gwen Stefani song in their head?  

I should talk though.  I learned to spell Massachusetts watching Captain Kangaroo spell it on the magic drawing board.


I keep hearin' you're concerned about my happiness.
All that thought you're giving me is conscience, I guess.
If I were walking in your shoes, I wouldn't worry none.
While you and your friends are worrying bout' me, I having lots of
fun.

Countin' flowers on the wall,
That don't bother me at all.
Playing Solitaire till dawn,
With a deck of fifty-one.
Smoking cigarettes and watching Captain Kangaroo.
Now, don't tell me I've nothing to do.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Kimmy53 on June 30, 2006, 11:49:02 AM
Quote from: "terryd270"
Kimmy,

I think you mean the trimming should be done with a really dull rusted butter knife.   :D


Yeah!!!!  I knew I liked you terry! :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: blah on June 30, 2006, 11:49:49 AM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Red, more the reason why GWB should have dumped all those WJC judges that he did not.


my god, is there ANYTHING that the Bush haters will not blame on him?

So now its Bush's fault that the judge overturned this confession?


unbelieveable.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: blah on June 30, 2006, 11:50:37 AM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Our courts seem to have been screwing up all week.
One judged has ruled that pedophiles can live in and hang around areas where young children play and that it would be unconstitutional if they could not.

Another group decide military tribunals violate the rights of Bin Laden's right hand man and other violent animals who want to destroy America and her future.

This judge decides to throw out the Couey confession.

I am beginning to think al Quaeda might be an arm of our judiciary system, bent on taking this country down.

Many men and women fought and died to make this country a kinder, gentler place to live and now the judges have the power to make it as barbaric as what we see in Eurasia.


ITS BUSH'S FAULT !


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Peaches on June 30, 2006, 11:50:38 AM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "Peaches"
Thik, another one of the daughter's faves!  

Can anybody spell bananas without hearing the Gwen Stefani song in their head?  

I should talk though.  I learned to spell Massachusetts watching Captain Kangaroo spell it on the magic drawing board.


I keep hearin' you're concerned about my happiness.
All that thought you're giving me is conscience, I guess.
If I were walking in your shoes, I wouldn't worry none.
While you and your friends are worrying bout' me, I having lots of
fun.

I love that song.  I was channelsurfing the other nite and they were raising funds on GA public tv.  Showed a really old clip of the Statler Bros. singing that song.  It was fabulous.  Also showed Patsy Cline and several other legends when they were young.  
Countin' flowers on the wall,
That don't bother me at all.
Playing Solitaire till dawn,
With a deck of fifty-one.
Smoking cigarettes and watching Captain Kangaroo.
Now, don't tell me I've nothing to do.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Peaches on June 30, 2006, 11:50:58 AM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "Peaches"
Thik, another one of the daughter's faves!  

Can anybody spell bananas without hearing the Gwen Stefani song in their head?  

I should talk though.  I learned to spell Massachusetts watching Captain Kangaroo spell it on the magic drawing board.


I keep hearin' you're concerned about my happiness.
All that thought you're giving me is conscience, I guess.
If I were walking in your shoes, I wouldn't worry none.
While you and your friends are worrying bout' me, I having lots of
fun.

I love that song.  I was channelsurfing the other nite and they were raising funds on GA public tv.  Showed a really old clip of the Statler Bros. singing that song.  It was fabulous.  Also showed Patsy Cline and several other legends when they were young.  

Countin' flowers on the wall,
That don't bother me at all.
Playing Solitaire till dawn,
With a deck of fifty-one.
Smoking cigarettes and watching Captain Kangaroo.
Now, don't tell me I've nothing to do.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on June 30, 2006, 11:51:09 AM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "Peaches"
OT- Judge tossed the Couey confession.  Don't get me started.  I didn't get enough sleep and I'm kinda cranky.  Go ahead and let that animal out.  Someone will get him and it won't be soon enough.

I freaking hope so..... these judges are useless to society IMO

Bill O'Reilly is going to go ballistic over this as  well he should.  I'm livid.  And I bet I'm not the only one.

I can't even look at Couey he makes me sick.


I think the only way he could look good would be in the crosshairs.


that's anohter reason for me to go and buy "A Time To Kill" this weekend and watch it ..... because IMO this would be it....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: San on June 30, 2006, 11:53:51 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
.
San,
Just ignore me--I am in my Blame KJ Mode that I cycle through about once a week.   :evil: I want to call her names but Klaas will just edit them out.   :evil: I wonder if she attended the around the pool meeting to explain no body/no crime or if she and Paulus just sorted that all out at the courthouse or by phone.   :evil: She seems to be lying to JQK a great deal.  Telling him she is not leaving at the end of the year when Jossy says her replacement is already on the island.   :evil:

Guess you get my drift--she is at the Top on My List Today for whatever reasons.. . . . . . .

 :wink:

Anna, I can't stand KJ as much as you.  I too believe she is lying to JQK about leaving.  What is happening here is all in the script.  It's like a horror movie.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Peaches on June 30, 2006, 11:54:19 AM
GA public tv was raising funds the other nite and showed a clip of the Statler Bros singing Flowers on the Wall. It was wonderful.  Also showed Patsy Cline and Willie Nelson and several others when they were young.  

That's what I meant to say before I dorked up the quotes.  Good thing I'm leaving early today....like now.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: sharon on June 30, 2006, 11:56:06 AM
Quote from: "terryd270"
Good morning everyone,

Easy how was MedleyRely exposed?  I would see her post on Rogers site and she was very much  infatuation or fixation on everything Sloot.  I know I wouldn't want her near my kid but she never hid the obsessive-compulsive behaviour about the sloots..  


Sharon, do you know someone by the name Shirley Tootle (IRS)  in Miami ?


Ummm, no Terry :shock:  I tend to try to avoid the IRS. Please don't tell her how to find me.

jk :D

No, I've not heard the name. Should I have?

I'm still celebrating the 'temporary' suspension of Johnny Winton!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Sam on June 30, 2006, 11:56:45 AM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "Peaches"
OT- Judge tossed the Couey confession.  Don't get me started.  I didn't get enough sleep and I'm kinda cranky.  Go ahead and let that animal out.  Someone will get him and it won't be soon enough.

I freaking hope so..... these judges are useless to society IMO

Bill O'Reilly is going to go ballistic over this as  well he should.  I'm livid.  And I bet I'm not the only one.

I can't even look at Couey he makes me sick.


His family makes me sick as well. Even though the confession was thrown out I do Thank God for the confession so her body could be found.
Jessica's family went through Hell. Not only did they have to endure the guilt of could they have better protected her but also the crappola put out on the internet. People are so cruel sometimes.

 That is why we monkeys appreciate this forum so much. We all have compassion for the real victims of these crimes. JMHO

Sam


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: SunnyinTX on June 30, 2006, 11:57:26 AM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Our courts seem to have been screwing up all week.
One judged has ruled that pedophiles can live in and hang around areas where young children play and that it would be unconstitutional if they could not.

Another group decide military tribunals violate the rights of Bin Laden's right hand man and other violent animals who want to destroy America and her future.

This judge decides to throw out the Couey confession.

I am beginning to think al Quaeda might be an arm of our judiciary system, bent on taking this country down.

Many men and women fought and died to make this country a kinder, gentler place to live and now the judges have the power to make it as barbaric as what we see in Eurasia.


APPLAUSE Tyler!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: terryd270 on June 30, 2006, 12:02:22 PM
When I ride my bike or take trips I listen to audible books and I been o a Western kick lately with Larry McMurtry,  Elmore Leonard, Luis L'Armour and others.. They used to hang a horse thief, I wonder if you tried that now what would happen to you..  Now we have civil courts for burning ones self with hot coffee..  I guess the judges that allowed Couey and other pedofiles are showing that we are a civilized society.  

What I really think is that in the old west, they had morals and they were the ones civilized.  I'm sure Couey would already be disposed of..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: KatzHome on June 30, 2006, 12:05:27 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "KatzHome"
Quote from: "Peaches"
Thik, you're reading my mind.  

Geez, I finally find a link to be helpful and did it at the same time as  Klaas.  WOOHOO!  I'm feeling like a big monkey now.


 :lol: I don't think I'll ever grow up to be a big monkey....  :oops:


You already are!!!  LOL....


 :lol: There's a difference between "big" and "old," Mrs. Red!  :?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on June 30, 2006, 12:06:23 PM
I'm supposed to be working right now but needed to say this about John Couey.  Please pardon my language.

I was a member of the "Jessica Lunsford Team Forum".  We prayed that little girl would be found alive.  When she was found, we grieved along with the family.  We never realized that anything could be worse until we found out he had burried that precious child alive.

Mark Lunsford and his entire familly were dragged through the dirt, much like the Refugees are doing to the Holloway/Twitty family right now.  

The death sentance is not good enough for that piece of shit scum bag John Couey.  If anyone should die a slow and torturous death it's him.  May he rott in hell.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on June 30, 2006, 12:06:30 PM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Thik, another one of the daughter's faves!  

Can anybody spell bananas without hearing the Gwen Stefani song in their head?  

I should talk though.  I learned to spell Massachusetts watching Captain Kangaroo spell it on the magic drawing board.


Gulity!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on June 30, 2006, 12:07:44 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
.
OK, Peaches,
I came back even mad about my email just to tell you that


NOW YOU KNOW WHERE FASHION SITS!

Bomp
Bomp
Bomp


.

PUTTIN' ON THE RITZ!!

.


 8)


Y'all are going to make my head pop off changing the station so often.... dang~ :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on June 30, 2006, 12:08:30 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Our courts seem to have been screwing up all week.
One judged has ruled that pedophiles can live in and hang around areas where young children play and that it would be unconstitutional if they could not.

Another group decide military tribunals violate the rights of Bin Laden's right hand man and other violent animals who want to destroy America and her future.

This judge decides to throw out the Couey confession.

I am beginning to think al Quaeda might be an arm of our judiciary system, bent on taking this country down.

Many men and women fought and died to make this country a kinder, gentler place to live and now the judges have the power to make it as barbaric as what we see in Eurasia.


Can I get a big AMEN??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: terryd270 on June 30, 2006, 12:08:51 PM
Well my downloads are done, just wanted to see whats happening.. Everyone have a good weekend and try to relax and enjoy some cold water mellon and have a fun long weekend..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on June 30, 2006, 12:11:20 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
I'm supposed to be working right now but needed to say this about John Couey.  Please pardon my language.

I was a member of the "Jessica Lunsford Team Forum".  We prayed that little girl would be found alive.  When she was found, we grieved along with the family.  We never realized that anything could be worse until we found out he had burried that precious child alive.

Mark Lunsford and his entire familly were dragged through the dirt, much like the Refugees are doing to the Holloway/Twitty family right now.  

The death sentance is not good enough for that piece of shit scum bag John Couey.  If anyone should die a slow and torturous death it's him.  May he rott in hell.


APPLAUDING!!  and if y'all saw the movie Capote, you will understand this... Hanging should have never been outlawed, it should have stayed for this kind of the lowest life scum to every scouge the earth...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: sharon on June 30, 2006, 12:12:43 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"

that's anohter reason for me to go and buy "A Time To Kill" this weekend and watch it ..... because IMO this would be it....


Try Charles Bronson -- Death Wish

Nobody does it better......

( :oops: sorry -- I'm in the same mood as y'all.)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: blah on June 30, 2006, 12:14:52 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "klaasend"
I'm supposed to be working right now but needed to say this about John Couey.  Please pardon my language.

I was a member of the "Jessica Lunsford Team Forum".  We prayed that little girl would be found alive.  When she was found, we grieved along with the family.  We never realized that anything could be worse until we found out he had burried that precious child alive.

Mark Lunsford and his entire familly were dragged through the dirt, much like the Refugees are doing to the Holloway/Twitty family right now.  

The death sentance is not good enough for that piece of shit scum bag John Couey.  If anyone should die a slow and torturous death it's him.  May he rott in hell.


APPLAUDING!!  and if y'all saw the movie Capote, you will understand this... Hanging should have never been outlawed, it should have stayed for this kind of the lowest life scum to every scouge the earth...


i started watching that movie but just couldnt get passed that annoying voice and had to turn it off.  I wish they would have toned it down just a little for the movie cuz i really wanted to watch it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Katysmom on June 30, 2006, 12:15:16 PM
It is horrible that Couey's confession has been thrown out, but it is the law that at any time during a police interogation, if the perp asks for an attorney the questioning is to stop immediately.  This was the fault of the investigators and no one else!  What would even have been worse, is if this judge had not followed the law, allowed the confession to remain, and then have Couey's conviction over turned on appeals for this fact!  Think about it!
The confession would of almost guaranteed the death penalty, and the investigators' should of been so very careful about how they were going about it.  I'm almost positive there will still be a conviction, it just won't be a slam dunk.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: sharon on June 30, 2006, 12:15:49 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Anna"
.
San,
Just ignore me--I am in my Blame KJ Mode that I cycle through about once a week.   :evil: I want to call her names but Klaas will just edit them out.   :evil: I wonder if she attended the around the pool meeting to explain no body/no crime or if she and Paulus just sorted that all out at the courthouse or by phone.   :evil: She seems to be lying to JQK a great deal.  Telling him she is not leaving at the end of the year when Jossy says her replacement is already on the island.   :evil:

Guess you get my drift--she is at the Top on My List Today for whatever reasons.. . . . . . .

 :wink:

Anna, I can't stand KJ as much as you.  I too believe she is lying to JQK about leaving.  What is happening here is all in the script.  It's like a horror movie.


I have been trying so hard to give her the benefit of the doubt.

I realize that it is somewhat prejudice on my part. But a female prosecutor -- I just wanted to believe that she was 'doing the right thing'.

I've given up on her.

I hope she either proves me wrong -- or burns in hell.

I think it's time for me to walk away from the keyboard........


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Red on June 30, 2006, 12:16:22 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Our courts seem to have been screwing up all week.
One judged has ruled that pedophiles can live in and hang around areas where young children play and that it would be unconstitutional if they could not.

Another group decide military tribunals violate the rights of Bin Laden's right hand man and other violent animals who want to destroy America and her future.

This judge decides to throw out the Couey confession.

I am beginning to think al Quaeda might be an arm of our judiciary system, bent on taking this country down.

Many men and women fought and died to make this country a kinder, gentler place to live and now the judges have the power to make it as barbaric as what we see in Eurasia.


Tyler,

It all goes back to a saying that I have as to why Judges and politicians do not take the protection of children seriously.

CHILDREN DON'T VOTE.

What part about these predators are a danger to society even after they get out of jail? Why would a pedophile feel the need to be near a park or a school bus stop? Gee, I wonder why?

How about the law read that even after these subhumans are out of jail, part of their life-time sentence/probation is they can't go near places where children obviously congregate?

Guess that would make too much sense.

Instead the answer is to let them roam around until the attack another child, then let them out again and only really punish them when they in fact kill a child.

Oh this makes sense. But those politicians will certainly pander to the illegal aliens for their vote won't they?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: terryd270 on June 30, 2006, 12:18:55 PM
Well it is the Fourth of July weekend coming and I guess this is on topic..
Although politics has historically been considered an honorable profession, many people today, have a poor opinion of politicians as a class. They are sometimes seen as unscrupulous, willing to say anything to get elected even if it is not in keeping with their principles or intentions. They may also be suspected of using government assets or privileges for their own interests, rather than the interests of the people. Indeed, incidents of political corruption are not uncommon.  I think a lot of the problems are with our current lobbying laws, mainly because of a large number of soft money donations to politicians.  

I said this once before that judges should be seated by what crime has affected them in their life.. A person sitting on the bench to hear pedofiles should know the pain what a pedofile has done and that will give that judge compassion for the victim and not the pedofile..

I know too simple but then again, I want to go back to the old west..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on June 30, 2006, 12:21:47 PM
Quote from: "terryd270"
Well it is the Fourth of July weekend coming and I guess this is on topic..
Although politics has historically been considered an honorable profession, many people today, have a poor opinion of politicians as a class. They are sometimes seen as unscrupulous, willing to say anything to get elected even if it is not in keeping with their principles or intentions. They may also be suspected of using government assets or privileges for their own interests, rather than the interests of the people. Indeed, incidents of political corruption are not uncommon. I think a lot of the problems are with our current lobbying laws, mainly because of a large number of soft money donations to politicians.  

I said this once before that judges should be seated by what crime has affected them in their life.. A person sitting on the bench to hear pedofiles should know the pain what a pedofile has done and that will give that judge compassion for the victim and not the pedofile..

I know too simple but then again, I want to go back to the old west..


Agreed but I think it's because we don't have term limits... hell they all get in there for life...(helms, byrd, kennedy, etc) and lose all touch with reality ....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on June 30, 2006, 12:21:51 PM
Quote from: "Katysmom"
It is horrible that Couey's confession has been thrown out, but it is the law that at any time during a police interogation, if the perp asks for an attorney the questioning is to stop immediately.  This was the fault of the investigators and no one else!  What would even have been worse, is if this judge had not followed the law, allowed the confession to remain, and then have Couey's conviction over turned on appeals for this fact!  Think about it!
The confession would of almost guaranteed the death penalty, and the investigators' should of been so very careful about how they were going about it.  I'm almost positive there will still be a conviction, it just won't be a slam dunk.


Katz - the fact that his confession has been thrown out doesn't really bother me that much, it won't make any difference IMO he will still be convicted.  Just seeing his face on TV sets me off and reminds me of all the crap Mark Lunsford and his family endured prior to her being found.  

I knew at the time that the confession would most likely be thrown out. They have plenty of evidence and if a jury doesn't convict him then I will give up all hope with humanity.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: terryd270 on June 30, 2006, 12:24:34 PM
MrsRed,

Exactly, "Career Politicians." A politician who makes politics the source of their income, yet has to face re-election every few years is less likely to make bold decisions or side with an unpopular bill. This fear of "rocking the boat" leads to a stagnant political climate, in which it becomes hard to address injustices and create change.  The problem is most of us here have very logical minds and moral character but I'm not sure anymore that is the majority view..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on June 30, 2006, 12:25:08 PM
Blah... the movie is soooo good... I remember watching Truman Capote on the TOnight Show with Carson... and we had a discussion here before about what case was the first you started to follow in this matter... wanting to see justice?  Remember TC was the first author to ever do a non-fiction book on a murder.... and IN COLD BLOOD really, really changed things.... I read it in high school... and it really freaked me out.... but it was the first case I read and got interested in... and it happened before I was even born....

so try and watch it... it's very, enlightening IMO


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on June 30, 2006, 12:26:12 PM
I am reading an commenting ...

I just saw SUNNY ... hey there!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Katysmom on June 30, 2006, 12:27:16 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Katysmom"
It is horrible that Couey's confession has been thrown out, but it is the law that at any time during a police interogation, if the perp asks for an attorney the questioning is to stop immediately.  This was the fault of the investigators and no one else!  What would even have been worse, is if this judge had not followed the law, allowed the confession to remain, and then have Couey's conviction over turned on appeals for this fact!  Think about it!
The confession would of almost guaranteed the death penalty, and the investigators' should of been so very careful about how they were going about it.  I'm almost positive there will still be a conviction, it just won't be a slam dunk.


Katz - the fact that his confession has been thrown out doesn't really bother me that much, it won't make any difference IMO he will still be convicted.  Just seeing his face on TV sets me off and reminds me of all the crap Mark Lunsford and his family endured prior to her being found.  

I knew at the time that the confession would most likely be thrown out. They have plenty of evidence and if a jury doesn't convict him then I will give up all hope with humanity.


I agree with you completely.  If a jury doesn't convict him, you can bet that Mark will see to it that he is punished.  I know I would.  I have sat through many murder trials and have always found it amazing at how most families have the dignity to sit through something like this, without pulling out a gun and blowing off the head of the perp.  It is heart wrenching to see a mother sitting in the same room as the man that killed her son/daughter.  I just can't comprehend the amount of pain.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: thik on June 30, 2006, 12:30:41 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Blah... the movie is soooo good... I remember watching Truman Capote on the TOnight Show with Carson... and we had a discussion here before about what case was the first you started to follow in this matter... wanting to see justice?  Remember TC was the first author to ever do a non-fiction book on a murder.... and IN COLD BLOOD really, really changed things.... I read it in high school... and it really freaked me out.... but it was the first case I read and got interested in... and it happened before I was even born....

so try and watch it... it's very, enlightening IMO



In Cold Blood.... was awsesome in its time...
defintely Robert Blakes' only good work....

beside the'' Lil Rascals'' 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Anna on June 30, 2006, 12:32:04 PM
.
How stupid that they did not provide Gooey Couey with an attorney!  
So his confession is thrown out and there is likely enough evidence without it to convict him.  So he goes to jail.  Will he be in with the general population?  Prolly, this is Florida, tough state.

So if his confession had stayed in, would he have received the death sentence?  Maybe so.  Nice lethal injection??  OK, what's going to happen to him in the general population?  See pedophile priest who was killed in under a year.  See same for Jeffery Dahlmer.  See same for lots and lots of these predators.  And it is certainly NOT by any relatively painless lethal injection.   :evil:

They just don't usually last too long in there.  Pity, isn't it???   8)
There is not a doubt in my mind that this man is going to pay and in this lifetime.
.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on June 30, 2006, 12:32:21 PM
Quote from: "thik"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Blah... the movie is soooo good... I remember watching Truman Capote on the TOnight Show with Carson... and we had a discussion here before about what case was the first you started to follow in this matter... wanting to see justice?  Remember TC was the first author to ever do a non-fiction book on a murder.... and IN COLD BLOOD really, really changed things.... I read it in high school... and it really freaked me out.... but it was the first case I read and got interested in... and it happened before I was even born....

so try and watch it... it's very, enlightening IMO



In Cold Blood.... was awsesome in its time...
defintely Robert Blakes' only good work....

beside the'' Lil Rascals'' 8)


The book made me sleep with the lights on for months....  :shock: (well I was in high school)  never saw the movie.... too freaked out from the book...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on June 30, 2006, 12:35:03 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
.
How stupid that they did not provide Gooey Couey with an attorney!  
So his confession is thrown out and there is likely enough evidence without it to convict him.  So he goes to jail.  Will he be in with the general population?  Prolly, this is Florida, tough state.

So if his confession had stayed in, would he have received the death sentence?  Maybe so.  Nice lethal injection??  OK, what's going to happen to him in the general population?  See pedophile priest who was killed in under a year.  See same for Jeffery Dahlmer.  See same for lots and lots of these predators.  And it is certainly NOT by any relatively painless lethal injection.   :evil:

They just don't usually last too long in there.  Pity, isn't it???   8)
There is not a doubt in my mind that this man is going to pay and in this lifetime.
.


GOOD... I think he is beyond Dante's Seventh Level of Hell....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: terryd270 on June 30, 2006, 12:36:44 PM
Well its late and I have a important date.. I putting on my Black Nikes, castrated myself, drink some Booze, and I'm waiting to catch the next Comet to the Next Level.  

Seriously, I want to think things are going to get better but sometimes the news is forcing me to reconsider and re-evaluate practically every thought, every action, and every institution formerly taken for granted.  I really do need to go and get ready for the weekend..  


Sharon, I asked if you knew Shirley Tootle, she is a friend of mine and I have some neat storied to tell of IRS Special agents.  I'm assuming your a CPA and Shirely was in charged of the Miami IRS office.. She went on a audit once and it was in Sweetwater and she was having coffee with the wife of the family that she was to audit.. She told me there were chickens running around and it got her out of the office.. Well the husband comes home and see's his wife talking to my friend and goes up stairs and they hear a shot.. The wife wanted my friend to go up there and she say no way and called the police and got the heck outta there.. She stopped doing field audits..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: KatzHome on June 30, 2006, 12:36:51 PM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "KatzHome"
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "Peaches"
OT- Judge tossed the Couey confession.  Don't get me started.  I didn't get enough sleep and I'm kinda cranky.  Go ahead and let that animal out.  Someone will get him and it won't be soon enough.


I freaking hope so..... these judges are useless to society IMO


Bill O'Reilly is going to go ballistic over this as  well he should.  I'm livid.  And I bet I'm not the only one.


The only thing I can say is that on some interview I heard that they have enough evidence that his confession isn't necessary...

I hope this guy gets the death penalty.


The death penalty will still give this scumbag 10-15 more years of life than he gave Jessica.  They need to speed up the appeals process to reduce the time elapsed between sentencing and execution.  Put in the fast lane and reserve it for pieces of crap like Couey.  

I bet he won't last long in the pokey.  I heard they hate child molesters.


I used to not believe in the death penalty at all ~ because I wanted for each person to have the full amount of time on earth alloted them by God  to come to Him and seek His Mercy.

Watching Scott Peterson in the News, I truly believe that it just might take knowing that his death was imminent before he ever reached that point of seeking God's Mercy. And that is why I wanted the death penalty for him.

And then I read about the guy who raped and murdered Dru Sojourne (sp?) ~ how he was released from prison after serving a 20 year sentence for rape and ATTEMPTED murder...  Released even though his psych evaluation showed that it was highly likely that he would do it again...  and the first time was only attempted because the first woman managed to get away...

And I came to thinking that the death penalty for some is a Mercy to Society.

And I no longer think that the death penalty should be reserved for murderers only.

I figure these people have a good 10 - 15 years, plus the shocking realization of knowing they are going to be put to death, to prepare to meet their Maker ~ that should be plenty of time for them to seek His Mercy...  and if not ~ I've also read, from Sister Faustina's writings, that Jesus gives all people 4 chances when they meet Him face to face, to accept Him, to seek His forgiveness and His Divine Mercy.

And I try to say the Divine Mercy Chaplet daily ~ I usually manage only to say it driving home from work though...  This prayer helps souls to have the courage, wisdom, and humility to accept this gracious offer of Jesus.

I want His Mercy ~ so I try to help obtain it for others...

And I'm Catholic ~ I do fully expect these guys to have a very long, miserable, Purgatory....   :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: thik on June 30, 2006, 12:39:02 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "thik"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Blah... the movie is soooo good... I remember watching Truman Capote on the TOnight Show with Carson... and we had a discussion here before about what case was the first you started to follow in this matter... wanting to see justice?  Remember TC was the first author to ever do a non-fiction book on a murder.... and IN COLD BLOOD really, really changed things.... I read it in high school... and it really freaked me out.... but it was the first case I read and got interested in... and it happened before I was even born....

so try and watch it... it's very, enlightening IMO



In Cold Blood.... was awsesome in its time...
defintely Robert Blakes' only good work....

beside the'' Lil Rascals'' 8)


The book made me sleep with the lights on for months....  :shock: (well I was in high school)  never saw the movie.... too freaked out from the book...



I didn't know 'lil Rascals'' was ever in 'book form'............. :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on June 30, 2006, 12:42:42 PM
thik...you are a bad, bad man! :lol:  :lol:

where is my sistah???


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Easywriter on June 30, 2006, 12:51:19 PM
Quote from: "thik"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Blah... the movie is soooo good... I remember watching Truman Capote on the TOnight Show with Carson... and we had a discussion here before about what case was the first you started to follow in this matter... wanting to see justice?  Remember TC was the first author to ever do a non-fiction book on a murder.... and IN COLD BLOOD really, really changed things.... I read it in high school... and it really freaked me out.... but it was the first case I read and got interested in... and it happened before I was even born....

so try and watch it... it's very, enlightening IMO



In Cold Blood.... was awsesome in its time...
defintely Robert Blakes' only good work....

beside the'' Lil Rascals'' 8)


I’ll never forget that scene when Blake is sitting next to the window and the drops of rain are running down the pane of glass distorting the image.  Eerie and a classic!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: thik on June 30, 2006, 12:55:52 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "thik"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Blah... the movie is soooo good... I remember watching Truman Capote on the TOnight Show with Carson... and we had a discussion here before about what case was the first you started to follow in this matter... wanting to see justice?  Remember TC was the first author to ever do a non-fiction book on a murder.... and IN COLD BLOOD really, really changed things.... I read it in high school... and it really freaked me out.... but it was the first case I read and got interested in... and it happened before I was even born....

so try and watch it... it's very, enlightening IMO



In Cold Blood.... was awsesome in its time...
defintely Robert Blakes' only good work....

beside the'' Lil Rascals'' 8)


I’ll never forget that scene when Blake is sitting next to the window and the drops of rain are running down the pane of glass distorting the image.  Eerie and a classic!


yeah, or the jail scene when he asks if he will' mess' himself when he hangs...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on June 30, 2006, 01:02:39 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Red, more the reason why GWB should have dumped all those WJC judges that he did not.


my god, is there ANYTHING that the Bush haters will not blame on him?

So now its Bush's fault that the judge overturned this confession?


unbelieveable.


Lord, I am not a Bush hater.  Quite the contrary.  I am sayig GW should have dumped the Clinton judges long ago.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: KatzHome on June 30, 2006, 01:03:11 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
I'm supposed to be working right now but needed to say this about John Couey.  Please pardon my language.

I was a member of the "Jessica Lunsford Team Forum".  We prayed that little girl would be found alive.  When she was found, we grieved along with the family.  We never realized that anything could be worse until we found out he had burried that precious child alive.

Mark Lunsford and his entire familly were dragged through the dirt, much like the Refugees are doing to the Holloway/Twitty family right now.  

The death sentance is not good enough for that piece of shit scum bag John Couey.  If anyone should die a slow and torturous death it's him.  May he rott in hell.


{{{hugs}}} Klaas....

I've read, that when our pain and suffering is too much for us to bear ~ that Jesus will stand ~ and take our pain unto Himself.

Operah had a show where women who were almost murdered, but managed to live through it ~ were on and talked about the experience.  All of them said that they felt no pain ~ that they felt nothing ~ no panic, no fear, no pain ~ that, at the most, it was like they were outside of themselves, peacefully viewing what was being done ~ but not able to feel it ~ nor really experience it.

I truly believe that Jesus takes the pain, horror, and suffering that we can't bear away from us ~ that God does this for all of His people ~ whether or not they believe in Him or even know him...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Anna on June 30, 2006, 01:05:23 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Red, more the reason why GWB should have dumped all those WJC judges that he did not.


my god, is there ANYTHING that the Bush haters will not blame on him?

So now its Bush's fault that the judge overturned this confession?


unbelieveable.


Lord, I am not a Bush hater.  Quite the contrary.  I am sayig GW should have dumped the Clinton judges long ago.


Along with Tenet, Clinton's Man in D.C. Headquarters who said Slam Dunk!!

Yeppers, Bush has been far, far too nice to some of these in office for far too long.   :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: KatzHome on June 30, 2006, 01:06:46 PM
Quote from: "Red"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Our courts seem to have been screwing up all week.
One judged has ruled that pedophiles can live in and hang around areas where young children play and that it would be unconstitutional if they could not.

Another group decide military tribunals violate the rights of Bin Laden's right hand man and other violent animals who want to destroy America and her future.

This judge decides to throw out the Couey confession.

I am beginning to think al Quaeda might be an arm of our judiciary system, bent on taking this country down.

Many men and women fought and died to make this country a kinder, gentler place to live and now the judges have the power to make it as barbaric as what we see in Eurasia.


Tyler,

It all goes back to a saying that I have as to why Judges and politicians do not take the protection of children seriously.

CHILDREN DON'T VOTE.

What part about these predators are a danger to society even after they get out of jail? Why would a pedophile feel the need to be near a park or a school bus stop? Gee, I wonder why?

How about the law read that even after these subhumans are out of jail, part of their life-time sentence/probation is they can't go near places where children obviously congregate?

Guess that would make too much sense.

Instead the answer is to let them roam around until the attack another child, then let them out again and only really punish them when they in fact kill a child.

Oh this makes sense. But those politicians will certainly pander to the illegal aliens for their vote won't they?


They don't give women much thought either, Red ~

Guys like the one who raped, tortured, and murdered Dru come to mind.

Why was he ever let out of prison?

Why do these guy have to murder someone before they're given the death penalty?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: blah on June 30, 2006, 01:07:30 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Red, more the reason why GWB should have dumped all those WJC judges that he did not.


my god, is there ANYTHING that the Bush haters will not blame on him?

So now its Bush's fault that the judge overturned this confession?


unbelieveable.


Lord, I am not a Bush hater.  Quite the contrary.  I am sayig GW should have dumped the Clinton judges long ago.



sorry if i misinterpreted what you meant.  I was listening to some jagoffs talking about something (you guessed it - bunch of libs) at work not long before reading this and i was already torqued up.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: KatzHome on June 30, 2006, 01:09:09 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Katysmom"
It is horrible that Couey's confession has been thrown out, but it is the law that at any time during a police interogation, if the perp asks for an attorney the questioning is to stop immediately.  This was the fault of the investigators and no one else!  What would even have been worse, is if this judge had not followed the law, allowed the confession to remain, and then have Couey's conviction over turned on appeals for this fact!  Think about it!
The confession would of almost guaranteed the death penalty, and the investigators' should of been so very careful about how they were going about it.  I'm almost positive there will still be a conviction, it just won't be a slam dunk.


Katz - the fact that his confession has been thrown out doesn't really bother me that much, it won't make any difference IMO he will still be convicted.  Just seeing his face on TV sets me off and reminds me of all the crap Mark Lunsford and his family endured prior to her being found.  

I knew at the time that the confession would most likely be thrown out. They have plenty of evidence and if a jury doesn't convict him then I will give up all hope with humanity.


And I still hold out hope that the jury will give him the death penalty even without his confession ~ I think that his conviction will be a slam-dunk.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on June 30, 2006, 01:09:22 PM
Hey everyone!  Hope all is well...

What we talking about?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: nonesuche on June 30, 2006, 01:10:48 PM
Hi Everyone-

Klaas you win our bet, I had to post today but I think you'll smile over this one.

This is very important for me today, and so close to my heart, so I post this with great gratitude and hope. So many of you have made this journey so much easier for us, and helped to sustain our spirits.

My hubby hit rock bottom last weekend, I feared he might not make it. Today he completed his 50th radiation treatment in 32 days, and he's still standing, even better he appears to be rebounding strongly. This is the FIRST time since this saga began that we have had any good news, any at all. His hemoglobin is great, his BP and his red and white cell counts very good, and he GAINED one pound!!  :D  :D  :D

He has a ways to go but his oncologist told him he is "remarkable" and "surprising everyone". I have repeated those words about 50 times since noon today, I can't say them out loud enough.

So yes there is power in prayer, he is living proof and some of you have prayed so hard I know you were neglecting other things in your day to do so. I can never thank you enough, never.

Please keep us in your prayers, today I truly can say that word miracle with a stronger voice than I could before. Thank you so much for that.

Please pray hard for Peaches too for she's been great support for us, even when I knew even hearing our negative news could be difficult for her.

All of you are in our prayers and we pray for each and every hurt or afflicted or challenged monkey or family member here, or in your hearts. We pray for Natalee and her family, for they made this community come together, and deserve great peace and justice in their lives.

It is wonderful to keep the faith and then to be blessed with reward from that. It is a joyful day.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on June 30, 2006, 01:11:02 PM
Quote from: "KatzHome"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Katysmom"
It is horrible that Couey's confession has been thrown out, but it is the law that at any time during a police interogation, if the perp asks for an attorney the questioning is to stop immediately.  This was the fault of the investigators and no one else!  What would even have been worse, is if this judge had not followed the law, allowed the confession to remain, and then have Couey's conviction over turned on appeals for this fact!  Think about it!
The confession would of almost guaranteed the death penalty, and the investigators' should of been so very careful about how they were going about it.  I'm almost positive there will still be a conviction, it just won't be a slam dunk.


Katz - the fact that his confession has been thrown out doesn't really bother me that much, it won't make any difference IMO he will still be convicted.  Just seeing his face on TV sets me off and reminds me of all the crap Mark Lunsford and his family endured prior to her being found.  

I knew at the time that the confession would most likely be thrown out. They have plenty of evidence and if a jury doesn't convict him then I will give up all hope with humanity.


And I still hold out hope that the jury will give him the death penalty even without his confession ~ I think that his conviction will be a slam-dunk.


I agree Katz!  Even without the confession, this dude will fry...period!  It's a no brainer...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on June 30, 2006, 01:13:57 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Hi Everyone-

Klaas you win our bet, I had to post today but I think you'll smile over this one.

This is very important for me today, and so close to my heart, so I post this with great gratitude and hope. So many of you have made this journey so much easier for us, and helped to sustain our spirits.

My hubby hit rock bottom last weekend, I feared he might not make it. Today he completed his 50th radiation treatment in 32 days, and he's still standing, even better he appears to be rebounding strongly. This is the FIRST time since this saga began that we have had any good news, any at all. His hemoglobin is great, his BP and his red and white cell counts very good, and he GAINED one pound!!  :D  :D  :D

He has a ways to go but his oncologist told him he is "remarkable" and "surprising everyone". I have repeated those words about 50 times since noon today, I can't say them out loud enough.

So yes there is power in prayer, he is living proof and some of you have prayed so hard I know you were neglecting other things in your day to do so. I can never thank you enough, never.

Please keep us in your prayers, today I truly can say that word miracle with a stronger voice than I could before. Thank you so much for that.

Please pray hard for Peaches too for she's been great support for us, even when I knew even hearing our negative news could be difficult for her.

All of you are in our prayers and we pray for each and every hurt or afflicted or challenged monkey or family member here, or in your hearts. We pray for Natalee and her family, for they made this community come together, and deserve great peace and justice in their lives.

It is wonderful to keep the faith and then to be blessed with reward from that. It is a joyful day.


GREAT NEWS!!!

I told you he would surprise them all!!  Nobody ever listens to me!!  :wink:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: KatzHome on June 30, 2006, 01:14:06 PM
I'm glad to hear that news, None ~ but I still will remember him at Mass today.  {{{hugs}}}  and love!

Okies ~ I have to hit the bathtub and get dressed ~ it's about a quarter after 10 here...  See you Monkeys later!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: KatzHome on June 30, 2006, 01:15:20 PM
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "KatzHome"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Katysmom"
It is horrible that Couey's confession has been thrown out, but it is the law that at any time during a police interogation, if the perp asks for an attorney the questioning is to stop immediately.  This was the fault of the investigators and no one else!  What would even have been worse, is if this judge had not followed the law, allowed the confession to remain, and then have Couey's conviction over turned on appeals for this fact!  Think about it!
The confession would of almost guaranteed the death penalty, and the investigators' should of been so very careful about how they were going about it.  I'm almost positive there will still be a conviction, it just won't be a slam dunk.


Katz - the fact that his confession has been thrown out doesn't really bother me that much, it won't make any difference IMO he will still be convicted.  Just seeing his face on TV sets me off and reminds me of all the crap Mark Lunsford and his family endured prior to her being found.  

I knew at the time that the confession would most likely be thrown out. They have plenty of evidence and if a jury doesn't convict him then I will give up all hope with humanity.


And I still hold out hope that the jury will give him the death penalty even without his confession ~ I think that his conviction will be a slam-dunk.


I agree Katz!  Even without the confession, this dude will fry...period!  It's a no brainer...


 :lol: I was just about to say Hi, Strike ~ and tell you that we're talking about Couey ~ and there you are ~ you jumped right in!

Okies ~ I really have to get running!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on June 30, 2006, 01:17:47 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Hi Everyone-

Klaas you win our bet, I had to post today but I think you'll smile over this one.

This is very important for me today, and so close to my heart, so I post this with great gratitude and hope. So many of you have made this journey so much easier for us, and helped to sustain our spirits.

My hubby hit rock bottom last weekend, I feared he might not make it. Today he completed his 50th radiation treatment in 32 days, and he's still standing, even better he appears to be rebounding strongly. This is the FIRST time since this saga began that we have had any good news, any at all. His hemoglobin is great, his BP and his red and white cell counts very good, and he GAINED one pound!!  :D  :D  :D

He has a ways to go but his oncologist told him he is "remarkable" and "surprising everyone". I have repeated those words about 50 times since noon today, I can't say them out loud enough.

So yes there is power in prayer, he is living proof and some of you have prayed so hard I know you were neglecting other things in your day to do so. I can never thank you enough, never.

Please keep us in your prayers, today I truly can say that word miracle with a stronger voice than I could before. Thank you so much for that.

Please pray hard for Peaches too for she's been great support for us, even when I knew even hearing our negative news could be difficult for her.

All of you are in our prayers and we pray for each and every hurt or afflicted or challenged monkey or family member here, or in your hearts. We pray for Natalee and her family, for they made this community come together, and deserve great peace and justice in their lives.

It is wonderful to keep the faith and then to be blessed with reward from that. It is a joyful day.


This calls for a 'Praise the Lord'....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Peaches on June 30, 2006, 01:18:25 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "terryd270"
Well it is the Fourth of July weekend coming and I guess this is on topic..
Although politics has historically been considered an honorable profession, many people today, have a poor opinion of politicians as a class. They are sometimes seen as unscrupulous, willing to say anything to get elected even if it is not in keeping with their principles or intentions. They may also be suspected of using government assets or privileges for their own interests, rather than the interests of the people. Indeed, incidents of political corruption are not uncommon. I think a lot of the problems are with our current lobbying laws, mainly because of a large number of soft money donations to politicians.  

I said this once before that judges should be seated by what crime has affected them in their life.. A person sitting on the bench to hear pedofiles should know the pain what a pedofile has done and that will give that judge compassion for the victim and not the pedofile..

I know too simple but then again, I want to go back to the old west..


Agreed but I think it's because we don't have term limits... hell they all get in there for life...(helms, byrd, kennedy, etc) and lose all touch with reality ....


Term limits would fix them.  If they had to go back and get a real job and face the constituents they just spent their term screwing, perhaps they would act differently.

Many times I vote the "The the bum out" ticket.  Depends on their past performance of course.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Peaches on June 30, 2006, 01:20:26 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Blah... the movie is soooo good... I remember watching Truman Capote on the TOnight Show with Carson... and we had a discussion here before about what case was the first you started to follow in this matter... wanting to see justice?  Remember TC was the first author to ever do a non-fiction book on a murder.... and IN COLD BLOOD really, really changed things.... I read it in high school... and it really freaked me out.... but it was the first case I read and got interested in... and it happened before I was even born....

so try and watch it... it's very, enlightening IMO


I rarely go to the movies but this one was fabulous.  Like Mrs. Red, I grew up watching TC on the Johnny Carson show.  "In Cold Blood" was his last piece of work I believe.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: San on June 30, 2006, 01:24:18 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Hi Everyone-

Klaas you win our bet, I had to post today but I think you'll smile over this one.

This is very important for me today, and so close to my heart, so I post this with great gratitude and hope. So many of you have made this journey so much easier for us, and helped to sustain our spirits.

My hubby hit rock bottom last weekend, I feared he might not make it. Today he completed his 50th radiation treatment in 32 days, and he's still standing, even better he appears to be rebounding strongly. This is the FIRST time since this saga began that we have had any good news, any at all. His hemoglobin is great, his BP and his red and white cell counts very good, and he GAINED one pound!!  :D  :D  :D

He has a ways to go but his oncologist told him he is "remarkable" and "surprising everyone". I have repeated those words about 50 times since noon today, I can't say them out loud enough.

So yes there is power in prayer, he is living proof and some of you have prayed so hard I know you were neglecting other things in your day to do so. I can never thank you enough, never.

Please keep us in your prayers, today I truly can say that word miracle with a stronger voice than I could before. Thank you so much for that.

Please pray hard for Peaches too for she's been great support for us, even when I knew even hearing our negative news could be difficult for her.

All of you are in our prayers and we pray for each and every hurt or afflicted or challenged monkey or family member here, or in your hearts. We pray for Natalee and her family, for they made this community come together, and deserve great peace and justice in their lives.

It is wonderful to keep the faith and then to be blessed with reward from that. It is a joyful day.

None, Great News :D .  Your hubby and you are always in my prayers.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: wreck on June 30, 2006, 01:24:57 PM
Great news nonesuch!

It took a whole week, but I finally got a response to my complaint to American Airlines about their promotion to Aruba.  While it was not quite a "form letter" it did repeat the same language used in many of the other responses I read here. I understand they would not quit flying to Aruba -- no one asked them to do that -- we simply expressed outrage they would FEATURE a promotion to there. I would write back -- but they make it such a pain-in-the-ass to so. Maybe the fact that it took a week to respond means they had MANY such letters -- I hope so!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: sharon on June 30, 2006, 01:25:13 PM
Quote from: "terryd270"

Sharon, I asked if you knew Shirley Tootle, she is a friend of mine and I have some neat storied to tell of IRS Special agents.  I'm assuming your a CPA and Shirely was in charged of the Miami IRS office.. She went on a audit once and it was in Sweetwater and she was having coffee with the wife of the family that she was to audit.. She told me there were chickens running around and it got her out of the office.. Well the husband comes home and see's his wife talking to my friend and goes up stairs and they hear a shot.. The wife wanted my friend to go up there and she say no way and called the police and got the heck outta there.. She stopped doing field audits..


 :D

No -- I don't know Shirley (that I'm aware of) TerryD. Sounds like I'd enjoy it, though.

I let my CPA license expire TerryD. I know -- I've been told I'm nuts, but it didn't mean that much to me. My degree is Accounting -- my minor computer science. I worked a lot with Accounting systems -- but grew to any business/operation application or process. Became a consultant and Project Manager instead (PMP :D ). Will be taking a few basic Six Sigma courses soon -- not planning on going for a 'belt' though.

My hubby was a commercial finance auditor for southeast bank -- before the Feds came across the street. He has lots of stories like Shirley, too.

We should sit out at Monty's one afternoon and share stories :D  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Peaches on June 30, 2006, 01:28:06 PM
Great news, None.  

I still want him to do the cottage cheese smoothies though.  There are no side effects to anything in that recipe and it's good calories.  I talked to my chemo nurse about it and she was all for it.  Of course, she was already a big fan of flaxseed oil.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Peaches on June 30, 2006, 01:29:33 PM
Gotta do some house stuff for a little bit. BBL

Smoochies to Mr. None for doing SO WELL!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: sharon on June 30, 2006, 01:34:25 PM
Nonesuche!

That is the best news I've heard today!

Celebrate!

Sharon


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Anna on June 30, 2006, 01:37:45 PM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Great news, None.  

I still want him to do the cottage cheese smoothies though.  There are no side effects to anything in that recipe and it's good calories.  I talked to my chemo nurse about it and she was all for it.  Of course, she was already a big fan of flaxseed oil.


WONDERFUL NEWS!

Yes, Peaches, Flaxseed oil is terrific for us all.  Omega Fatty Acids. I alternate between flaxseed and fish oil for this myself.   I give plenty of those to my dogs, too, and do not have ONE SINGLE skin allergy.  Been doing that for ten years.  Now I see on the front of Science Diet and other dog goods the claims for better vision, smarter pups even.  Hah!  I knew this ten years ago but now it is included in any dog food worth feeding.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Rooscrew on June 30, 2006, 02:01:43 PM
Great news None!!!!! :) :)
 
Your post brought tears to my eyes and am so happy to hear this good news. You and Mr. None will continue to be in my thoughts & prayers and I won't quit praying until this whole thing is finished!!!  :)

Roo~


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: cp405 on June 30, 2006, 02:09:40 PM
That's great news none, your hubby has constantly been in my thoughts and prayers.

Anna, I give my dogs a fish oil capsule daily also.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on June 30, 2006, 02:11:41 PM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Blah... the movie is soooo good... I remember watching Truman Capote on the TOnight Show with Carson... and we had a discussion here before about what case was the first you started to follow in this matter... wanting to see justice?  Remember TC was the first author to ever do a non-fiction book on a murder.... and IN COLD BLOOD really, really changed things.... I read it in high school... and it really freaked me out.... but it was the first case I read and got interested in... and it happened before I was even born....

so try and watch it... it's very, enlightening IMO


I rarely go to the movies but this one was fabulous.  Like Mrs. Red, I grew up watching TC on the Johnny Carson show.  "In Cold Blood" was his last piece of work I believe.


It was and he died in 1984... of liver disease..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on June 30, 2006, 02:25:38 PM
Quote from: "Rooscrew"
Great news None!!!!! :) :)
 
Your post brought tears to my eyes and am so happy to hear this good news. You and Mr. None will continue to be in my thoughts & prayers and I won't quit praying until this whole thing is finished!!!  :)

Roo~


Just catching up.... I am so thankful that there is good news for you None... just so thankful... and like Roo said keeping you in my thoughts and prayers...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Red on June 30, 2006, 02:42:49 PM
New Front Page Post:

Amigoe: AVP-party leader Mike Eman: ‘Aruba in constitutional crises’



http://tinyurl.com/lj6ha

The disarray in Aruba I hope has got the attention of a certain NYC Judge who is considering the jurisdiction of Natalee Holloway family’s civil case. The lack of a competent investigation, questionable rulings by previous judges, home-town croneism and a less than solid political situation in Aruba would hopefully point the Judge to determine that the Holloway’s & Twitty’s could not get a fair trial in Aruba and keep the jurisdiction in NYC.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Peaches on June 30, 2006, 02:44:22 PM
Great Front Page stuff out there today.  Go Red.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Kimmy53 on June 30, 2006, 02:48:44 PM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Hi Everyone-

Klaas you win our bet, I had to post today but I think you'll smile over this one.

This is very important for me today, and so close to my heart, so I post this with great gratitude and hope. So many of you have made this journey so much easier for us, and helped to sustain our spirits.

My hubby hit rock bottom last weekend, I feared he might not make it. Today he completed his 50th radiation treatment in 32 days, and he's still standing, even better he appears to be rebounding strongly. This is the FIRST time since this saga began that we have had any good news, any at all. His hemoglobin is great, his BP and his red and white cell counts very good, and he GAINED one pound!!  :D  :D  :D

He has a ways to go but his oncologist told him he is "remarkable" and "surprising everyone". I have repeated those words about 50 times since noon today, I can't say them out loud enough.

So yes there is power in prayer, he is living proof and some of you have prayed so hard I know you were neglecting other things in your day to do so. I can never thank you enough, never.

Please keep us in your prayers, today I truly can say that word miracle with a stronger voice than I could before. Thank you so much for that.

Please pray hard for Peaches too for she's been great support for us, even when I knew even hearing our negative news could be difficult for her.

All of you are in our prayers and we pray for each and every hurt or afflicted or challenged monkey or family member here, or in your hearts. We pray for Natalee and her family, for they made this community come together, and deserve great peace and justice in their lives.

It is wonderful to keep the faith and then to be blessed with reward from that. It is a joyful day.


This calls for a 'Praise the Lord'....


Yes! Yes! Yes!  Praise the Lord!

None - I will continue to keep you and your husband in my prayers..  I believe sooo strongly in prayer and your news today has strengthened that belief even more.  Great News!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: SunnyinTX on June 30, 2006, 02:52:48 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
I am reading an commenting ...

I just saw SUNNY ... hey there!!


Hey Mrs. Red and all.....I am reading and KLAAS said a cuss owrd!!  But in this case...it was absolutely the only thing to say.....I can't even comment on that animal without getting my blood pressure going sky high!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Mrsn2itiv on June 30, 2006, 02:55:07 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Hi Everyone-

Klaas you win our bet, I had to post today but I think you'll smile over this one.

This is very important for me today, and so close to my heart, so I post this with great gratitude and hope. So many of you have made this journey so much easier for us, and helped to sustain our spirits.

My hubby hit rock bottom last weekend, I feared he might not make it. Today he completed his 50th radiation treatment in 32 days, and he's still standing, even better he appears to be rebounding strongly. This is the FIRST time since this saga began that we have had any good news, any at all. His hemoglobin is great, his BP and his red and white cell counts very good, and he GAINED one pound!!  :D  :D  :D

He has a ways to go but his oncologist told him he is "remarkable" and "surprising everyone". I have repeated those words about 50 times since noon today, I can't say them out loud enough.

So yes there is power in prayer, he is living proof and some of you have prayed so hard I know you were neglecting other things in your day to do so. I can never thank you enough, never.

Please keep us in your prayers, today I truly can say that word miracle with a stronger voice than I could before. Thank you so much for that.

Please pray hard for Peaches too for she's been great support for us, even when I knew even hearing our negative news could be difficult for her.

All of you are in our prayers and we pray for each and every hurt or afflicted or challenged monkey or family member here, or in your hearts. We pray for Natalee and her family, for they made this community come together, and deserve great peace and justice in their lives.

It is wonderful to keep the faith and then to be blessed with reward from that. It is a joyful day.


Hello
Monkey and monkeyettes!!

And {{{HUGS}}} {{{{HUGS}}}} {{{{{HUGS}}}}} NS!!!!!!  :D  :D  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: SunnyinTX on June 30, 2006, 02:56:43 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Hi Everyone-

Klaas you win our bet, I had to post today but I think you'll smile over this one.

This is very important for me today, and so close to my heart, so I post this with great gratitude and hope. So many of you have made this journey so much easier for us, and helped to sustain our spirits.

My hubby hit rock bottom last weekend, I feared he might not make it. Today he completed his 50th radiation treatment in 32 days, and he's still standing, even better he appears to be rebounding strongly. This is the FIRST time since this saga began that we have had any good news, any at all. His hemoglobin is great, his BP and his red and white cell counts very good, and he GAINED one pound!!  :D  :D  :D

He has a ways to go but his oncologist told him he is "remarkable" and "surprising everyone". I have repeated those words about 50 times since noon today, I can't say them out loud enough.

So yes there is power in prayer, he is living proof and some of you have prayed so hard I know you were neglecting other things in your day to do so. I can never thank you enough, never.

Please keep us in your prayers, today I truly can say that word miracle with a stronger voice than I could before. Thank you so much for that.

Please pray hard for Peaches too for she's been great support for us, even when I knew even hearing our negative news could be difficult for her.

All of you are in our prayers and we pray for each and every hurt or afflicted or challenged monkey or family member here, or in your hearts. We pray for Natalee and her family, for they made this community come together, and deserve great peace and justice in their lives.

It is wonderful to keep the faith and then to be blessed with reward from that. It is a joyful day.


NONE this is fantastic news,,,,I am a firm believer that God hears our prayers and Mr. NONE is proof positive.....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on June 30, 2006, 02:58:54 PM
Hey mrs2


how are you??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Mrsn2itiv on June 30, 2006, 02:59:15 PM
(((MRS RED)))

I have missed YOU!!!!  {{{HUGS}}[/size]


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on June 30, 2006, 03:00:08 PM
Quote from: "Mrsn2itiv"
(((MRS RED)))

I have missed YOU!!!!  {{{HUGS}}[/size]


well I have had easier days for the last week.. in waiting mode for every case I am assigned.. getting my monkey time in!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Mrsn2itiv on June 30, 2006, 03:01:36 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Hey mrs2


how are you??
Thongs are wonderful Mrs Red!!!!
Well, they were.....I hated to see that story about Jessica...it broke my heart to pieces....I am so mad!  I so wish we could do unto others as he has done onto them!! :evil:  :evil:  :evil:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Mrsn2itiv on June 30, 2006, 03:04:20 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "Mrsn2itiv"
(((MRS RED)))

I have missed YOU!!!!  {{{HUGS}}[/size]


well I have had easier days for the last week.. in waiting mode for every case I am assigned.. getting my monkey time in!!!
Good for you!!.  :D  





....and y am I nekky???   :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on June 30, 2006, 03:04:30 PM
Quote from: "Mrsn2itiv"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Hey mrs2


how are you??
Thongs are wonderful Mrs Red!!!!
Well, they were.....I hated to see that story about Jessica...it broke my heart to pieces....I am so mad!  I so wish we could do unto others as he has done onto them!! :evil:  :evil:  :evil:


OH I am firmly in the belief that do unto others applies in this case... somebody should do unto him!!! :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Mrsn2itiv on June 30, 2006, 03:08:09 PM
It was nice posting wif ya Mrs Red!!! See ya soon!!! 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on June 30, 2006, 03:11:45 PM
Quote from: "Mrsn2itiv"
It was nice posting wif ya Mrs Red!!! See ya soon!!! 8)


Take care Mrs...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Mrsn2itiv on June 30, 2006, 03:12:30 PM
and if I dont see You Monkeys B4......


HAPPY

FOURTH



OF



JULY!!!!   :D  :D  :D

 
 

God Bless America!!!!! My Home Sweet Home!!!!!!!!!! :D

and God Bless da Monkeys 2!! :P


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on June 30, 2006, 03:24:02 PM
I think I see Sunny out there... she needs to get caught up!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: kuoka on June 30, 2006, 03:24:50 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Hi Everyone-

Klaas you win our bet, I had to post today but I think you'll smile over this one.

This is very important for me today, and so close to my heart, so I post this with great gratitude and hope. So many of you have made this journey so much easier for us, and helped to sustain our spirits.

My hubby hit rock bottom last weekend, I feared he might not make it. Today he completed his 50th radiation treatment in 32 days, and he's still standing, even better he appears to be rebounding strongly. This is the FIRST time since this saga began that we have had any good news, any at all. His hemoglobin is great, his BP and his red and white cell counts very good, and he GAINED one pound!!  :D  :D  :D

He has a ways to go but his oncologist told him he is "remarkable" and "surprising everyone". I have repeated those words about 50 times since noon today, I can't say them out loud enough.

So yes there is power in prayer, he is living proof and some of you have prayed so hard I know you were neglecting other things in your day to do so. I can never thank you enough, never.

Please keep us in your prayers, today I truly can say that word miracle with a stronger voice than I could before. Thank you so much for that.

Please pray hard for Peaches too for she's been great support for us, even when I knew even hearing our negative news could be difficult for her.

All of you are in our prayers and we pray for each and every hurt or afflicted or challenged monkey or family member here, or in your hearts. We pray for Natalee and her family, for they made this community come together, and deserve great peace and justice in their lives.

It is wonderful to keep the faith and then to be blessed with reward from that. It is a joyful day.


Great news None! Way to go Mr. None! Continue to kick butt!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on June 30, 2006, 03:29:07 PM
Great News None!

Hi Monks!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: kuoka on June 30, 2006, 03:31:16 PM
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"
Great News None!

Hi Monks!


Aloha FM! It's great to see ya!  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on June 30, 2006, 03:31:56 PM
Mahalo Kuoka!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on June 30, 2006, 03:32:30 PM
Where is that Mother of Yours?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: kuoka on June 30, 2006, 03:35:17 PM
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"
Where is that Mother of Yours?


Aww FM, I wish I knew. I haven't heard hide nor hair of her and I'm worried sick! I miss my sister too!  :roll:  :(


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on June 30, 2006, 03:40:25 PM
Hello everyone.  Ready for this weekend?

None - Wonderful to hear the great news about Mr. None.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on June 30, 2006, 03:43:18 PM
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
Hello everyone.  Ready for this weekend?

None - Wonderful to hear the great news about Mr. None.


Hey Sun!!  Any 4th plans???


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on June 30, 2006, 03:44:06 PM
Yeah, I'm not sure if I got the chance to add my congrats None!!  Great news indeed!!  God does find a way...that's for sure!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on June 30, 2006, 03:45:50 PM
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Yeah, I'm not sure if I got the chance to add my congrats None!!  Great news indeed!!  God does find a way...that's for sure!


third.... how are you??  what's the plan???


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: SunnyinTX on June 30, 2006, 03:46:00 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
I think I see Sunny out there... she needs to get caught up!!


WOOHOO I am here!! Can anyone see me!  WOOHOO Y'ALL....don't make me do no southern Cussing!!! :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on June 30, 2006, 03:46:24 PM
Quote from: "SunnyinTX"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
I think I see Sunny out there... she needs to get caught up!!


WOOHOO I am here!! Can anyone see me!  WOOHOO Y'ALL....don't make me do no southern Cussing!!! :D


It's about dang time....LOL :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on June 30, 2006, 03:46:35 PM
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
Hello everyone.  Ready for this weekend?


I'm pretty much read for ANY weekend!!  But, and extended one??  Goes without saying!  ;)

And you?  What you got planned?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on June 30, 2006, 03:47:31 PM
Sunny - I see you stop waving everything is jiggling!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: SunnyinTX on June 30, 2006, 03:47:57 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "SunnyinTX"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
I think I see Sunny out there... she needs to get caught up!!


WOOHOO I am here!! Can anyone see me!  WOOHOO Y'ALL....don't make me do no southern Cussing!!! :D


It's about dang time....LOL :lol:


I hate to go read Red's new FRONT PAGE!!  GO RED! GO RED!!

and remember I have to run to catch up and I got those short little legs!! :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on June 30, 2006, 03:48:14 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Yeah, I'm not sure if I got the chance to add my congrats None!!  Great news indeed!!  God does find a way...that's for sure!


third.... how are you??  what's the plan???


I'm GREAT Mrs Red!!  Well, as great as you can be waiting for the work day to end...;)  It's good to see you!!

What about you?  What you and the Mr. have planned?  Saving the world I'd imagine...;)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on June 30, 2006, 03:48:25 PM
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"
Sunny - I see you stop waving everything is jiggling!


Sunny is not jiggling!!! :shock:  :shock:  :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: SunnyinTX on June 30, 2006, 03:48:54 PM
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"
Sunny - I see you stop waving everything is jiggling!



ooopsssss don want not jiggling...but at my age who cares!  LOL


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on June 30, 2006, 03:49:32 PM
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Yeah, I'm not sure if I got the chance to add my congrats None!!  Great news indeed!!  God does find a way...that's for sure!


third.... how are you??  what's the plan???


I'm GREAT Mrs Red!!  Well, as great as you can be waiting for the work day to end...;)  It's good to see you!!

What about you?  What you and the Mr. have planned?  Saving the world I'd imagine...;)


I guess you been reading the front page.... LOL

well my boss is the ONLY BOSS in the world that is making us work MONDAY ~ so I am just headed to the beach every second I can!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on June 30, 2006, 03:49:55 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"
Sunny - I see you stop waving everything is jiggling!


Sunny is not jiggling!!! :shock:  :shock:  :shock:


She is like jello! :wink:  :lol:  :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: SunnyinTX on June 30, 2006, 03:50:25 PM
ok...this darn sling has got to come off....

correction: I HAD to go read Red's FP


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on June 30, 2006, 03:50:39 PM
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"
Sunny - I see you stop waving everything is jiggling!


Sunny is not jiggling!!! :shock:  :shock:  :shock:


She is like jello! :wink:  :lol:  :shock:


nuh uh..... not the thong wearing shero.... say it ain't so!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on June 30, 2006, 03:51:00 PM
Quote from: "SunnyinTX"
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"
Sunny - I see you stop waving everything is jiggling!



ooopsssss don want not jiggling...but at my age who cares!  LOL


Wait...there's nothing wrong with a little jiggling!  Let's you know you got "stuff"...ya know??  ;)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on June 30, 2006, 03:55:17 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
well my boss is the ONLY BOSS in the world that is making us work MONDAY ~ so I am just headed to the beach every second I can!!!


I wouldn't say the ONLY boss!!  We work Monday too.  Although, I am taking it off...;)

Beach, huh?  I think we're going on Sunday.  It should be nice.  Weather supposed to be in the late 90's for us here.  Should be a lot cooler at the beach though...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on June 30, 2006, 04:00:23 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Flash from the past - what poster said these words in June 2005?

WHO SIGNED THE PAPERS?  WHO MAKES THE DECISION WHETHER TO ARREST SOMEONE?

This poster finally asked it enough times that I started researching Auban law and determined that person was KJ.  That was mid June 2005.


Marianne Croes was lead prosecutor until June 29, 2005.  Then Karin Jannsen took her place.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Peaches on June 30, 2006, 04:03:42 PM
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
well my boss is the ONLY BOSS in the world that is making us work MONDAY ~ so I am just headed to the beach every second I can!!!


I wouldn't say the ONLY boss!!  We work Monday too.  Although, I am taking it off...;)


I'm taking it off too.  Most people in my office are taking it off.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: SunnyinTX on June 30, 2006, 04:04:37 PM
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "SunnyinTX"
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"
Sunny - I see you stop waving everything is jiggling!



ooopsssss don want not jiggling...but at my age who cares!  LOL


Wait...there's nothing wrong with a little jiggling!  Let's you know you got "stuff"...ya know??  ;)


TS, I knew you were my kinda guy!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on June 30, 2006, 04:08:35 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"
Sunny - I see you stop waving everything is jiggling!


Sunny is not jiggling!!! :shock:  :shock:  :shock:


She is like jello! :wink:  :lol:  :shock:


nuh uh..... not the thong wearing shero.... say it ain't so!


MTWS!  New Anocronym for Sunny!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on June 30, 2006, 04:09:36 PM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
well my boss is the ONLY BOSS in the world that is making us work MONDAY ~ so I am just headed to the beach every second I can!!!


I wouldn't say the ONLY boss!!  We work Monday too.  Although, I am taking it off...;)


I'm taking it off too.  Most people in my office are taking it off.


I wasnt' allowed...but it's all good... I will have a head start to see the fireworks and my town has great fireworks!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on June 30, 2006, 04:17:03 PM
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Flash from the past - what poster said these words in June 2005?

WHO SIGNED THE PAPERS?  WHO MAKES THE DECISION WHETHER TO ARREST SOMEONE?

This poster finally asked it enough times that I started researching Auban law and determined that person was KJ.  That was mid June 2005.


Marianne Croes was lead prosecutor until June 29, 2005.  Then Karin Jannsen took her place.


Sunfreak
- I believe Marianne Croes was a spokesperson for KJ's office.  KJ was still in charge.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: SunnyinTX on June 30, 2006, 04:18:03 PM
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"
Quote from: "mrs. red"

nuh uh..... not the thong wearing shero.... say it ain't so!


MTWS!  New Anocronym for Sunny!


I like that~ :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: SunnyinTX on June 30, 2006, 04:19:33 PM
Klass is back!!  Someone please tell her GOOd I have been...no Southern Cussing!!! :wink: (she won't beleive me :D )


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: msmarple on June 30, 2006, 04:19:49 PM
Slow/no news day on NH ... here's something I just saw in case it hasn't been posted here --

Winkler said the two had argued throughout the evening about several things, including family finances. The problems were "mostly my fault," she said, because she was in charge of keeping the family books.

"He had really been on me lately criticizing me for things — the way I walk, I eat, everything. It was just building up to a point. I was tired of it. I guess I got to a point and snapped," Booth read to the court.

The minister's wife who shot her husband .... I guess it was just a really, really bad day.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Houdini on June 30, 2006, 04:20:01 PM
Mrs.Red wrote:
Quote
well my boss is the ONLY BOSS in the world that is making us work MONDAY ~ so I am just headed to the beach every second I can!!!


The Federal Government will be working Monday as well.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on June 30, 2006, 04:20:27 PM
Quote from: "SunnyinTX"
Klass is back!!  Someone please tell her GOOd I have been...no Southern Cussing!!! :wink: (she won't beleive me :D )


LOL :lol:  :lol: Even when I'm not posting I'm still watching YOU like a hawk!  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on June 30, 2006, 04:22:13 PM
Quote from: "SunnyinTX"
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "SunnyinTX"
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"
Sunny - I see you stop waving everything is jiggling!



ooopsssss don want not jiggling...but at my age who cares!  LOL


Wait...there's nothing wrong with a little jiggling!  Let's you know you got "stuff"...ya know??  ;)


TS, I knew you were my kinda guy!!


Sounds about right Sunny!!  ;)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Houdini on June 30, 2006, 04:22:18 PM
msmarple wrote:
Quote
The minister's wife who shot her husband .... I guess it was just a really, really bad day.

\

Well, it was a WORSE day for him. :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: msmarple on June 30, 2006, 04:25:46 PM
Quote from: "Houdini"
msmarple wrote:
Quote
The minister's wife who shot her husband .... I guess it was just a really, really bad day.

\

Well, it was a WORSE day for him. :shock:


Yeah, you got that right.   :(  

Hey, I just noticed the post time seems to be correct ... a baby step. We're nekky, can't edit, can't ignore, can't PM - but at least we know what time it is again!  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on June 30, 2006, 04:26:28 PM
Quote from: "Houdini"
Mrs.Red wrote:
Quote
well my boss is the ONLY BOSS in the world that is making us work MONDAY ~ so I am just headed to the beach every second I can!!!


The Federal Government will be working Monday as well.


yep, which is why I have to "hold down the fort"   :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on June 30, 2006, 04:26:53 PM
OK..back to working and lurking for me. :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: thik on June 30, 2006, 04:27:23 PM
Quote from: "Houdini"
msmarple wrote:
Quote
The minister's wife who shot her husband .... I guess it was just a really, really bad day.

\

Well, it was a WORSE day for him. :shock:


dont ya just hate those 'bad days' ?
I'll bet no one critisizes how she walks again..

 :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on June 30, 2006, 04:29:08 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "Houdini"
Mrs.Red wrote:
Quote
well my boss is the ONLY BOSS in the world that is making us work MONDAY ~ so I am just headed to the beach every second I can!!!


The Federal Government will be working Monday as well.


yep, which is why I have to "hold down the fort"   :lol:


So, you're a govt worker Mrs Red?  Can you get me a break on my taxes??  ;)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on June 30, 2006, 04:30:33 PM
Quote from: "thik"
Quote from: "Houdini"
msmarple wrote:
Quote
The minister's wife who shot her husband .... I guess it was just a really, really bad day.

\

Well, it was a WORSE day for him. :shock:


dont ya just hate those 'bad days' ?
I'll bet no one critisizes how she walks again..

 :roll:


If you do, you better either have on Kevlar, or be VERY quick on your feet... :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: SunnyinTX on June 30, 2006, 04:30:38 PM
Quote from: "msmarple"
Slow/no news day on NH ... here's something I just saw in case it hasn't been posted here --

Winkler said the two had argued throughout the evening about several things, including family finances. The problems were "mostly my fault," she said, because she was in charge of keeping the family books.

"He had really been on me lately criticizing me for things — the way I walk, I eat, everything. It was just building up to a point. I was tired of it. I guess I got to a point and snapped," Booth read to the court.

The minister's wife who shot her husband .... I guess it was just a really, really bad day.



Yikes...I hadn't read that statment...yep it was a really bad day!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: SunnyinTX on June 30, 2006, 04:32:19 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "SunnyinTX"
Klass is back!!  Someone please tell her GOOd I have been...no Southern Cussing!!! :wink: (she won't beleive me :D )


LOL :lol:  :lol: Even when I'm not posting I'm still watching YOU like a hawk!  :lol:


Oh mercy!!!   :shock: Lala's put you up to that, huh? :x


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on June 30, 2006, 04:32:24 PM
Quote from: "thik"
Quote from: "Houdini"
msmarple wrote:
Quote
The minister's wife who shot her husband .... I guess it was just a really, really bad day.

\

Well, it was a WORSE day for him. :shock:


dont ya just hate those 'bad days' ?
I'll bet no one critisizes how she walks again..

 :roll:


If you do, you better either have on Kevlar, or be VERY quick on your feet... :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: msmarple on June 30, 2006, 04:34:16 PM
Quote from: "thik"
Quote from: "Houdini"
msmarple wrote:
Quote
The minister's wife who shot her husband .... I guess it was just a really, really bad day.

\

Well, it was a WORSE day for him. :shock:


dont ya just hate those 'bad days' ?
I'll bet no one critisizes how she walks again..

 :roll:


The "... really bad day" line was in "Crimes of the Heart" (I think was the title). Sissy Spacek, Jessica Lange, Diane Keaton were sisters.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: SunnyinTX on June 30, 2006, 04:34:19 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
OK..back to working and lurking for me. :wink:


that's good Klaas...take a break :wink: hee hee hee...I'll keep an eye on things for you :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on June 30, 2006, 04:36:10 PM
Oh! My!

Let that be a lesson to you guys about criticizing!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: SunnyinTX on June 30, 2006, 04:39:17 PM
???? Has it ever been established who Carlos, the Columbian was working for?  Is he a gardner?  Where was he living?  Do gardners live at the houses of people they work for?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: thik on June 30, 2006, 04:39:45 PM
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"
Oh! My!

Let that be a lesson to you guys about criticizing!



Now I'm wondering what the ''critique'' was on her walking,, how does one walk,, so as to be critisized in the 1st place??  

They definitely took the ''fun' out of dis''fun''ction..... 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Houdini on June 30, 2006, 04:40:13 PM
Thirdstrike wrote:
Quote
So, you're a govt worker Mrs Red? Can you get me a break on my taxes??


You could always "go Amish" TS.  Declare yourself a non-profit religious organization.

It's against the Constitution to mix Church and State. :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on June 30, 2006, 04:55:06 PM
Quote from: "Houdini"
Thirdstrike wrote:
Quote
So, you're a govt worker Mrs Red? Can you get me a break on my taxes??


You could always "go Amish" TS.  Declare yourself a non-profit religious organization.

It's against the Constitution to mix Church and State. :lol:


Not sure I want to do that Houdini!  I love TV too much... :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on June 30, 2006, 04:58:34 PM
I am OFF for the next four days - yipee!

I think it SUCKS (sorry Klaas) that anybody has to work Monday!

ESPECIALLY - Mrs. Red (White and Blue).

We need to reevaluate our priorities in this society.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Houdini on June 30, 2006, 04:59:06 PM
Thirdstrike wrote:
Quote
Not sure I want to do that Houdini! I love TV too much...



Okay then, how about Mennonite?  You can still have a TV, but it has to be "basic B/W", and no cable hook up.

Or don't you want to "suffer" for your art?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on June 30, 2006, 05:01:21 PM
I LOVE THIRDSTRIKE!

There I've said it!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on June 30, 2006, 05:04:14 PM
Quote from: "terryd270"

 I want to go back to the old west..


I'd like to dispense justice like Judge Roy Bean did.  :D  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on June 30, 2006, 05:06:51 PM
Good afternoon Monkeys!

Wishing everyone a great long week end! 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: SunnyinTX on June 30, 2006, 05:06:59 PM
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"
I am OFF for the next four days - yipee!

I think it SUCKS (sorry Klaas) that anybody has to work Monday!

ESPECIALLY - Mrs. Red (White and Blue).

We need to reevaluate our priorities in this society.


Have a good time off FM.....it started raining here and it's predicted to rain for the next 4 days.....oh well.....we need the rain! <sigh>


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on June 30, 2006, 05:07:05 PM
where is Metro - is the bar open?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: SunnyinTX on June 30, 2006, 05:07:52 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Good afternoon Monkeys!

Wishing everyone a great long week end! 8)


Hi Jacque.....same to you...what are your plans for the long weekend


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on June 30, 2006, 05:08:51 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
Hello everyone.  Ready for this weekend?

None - Wonderful to hear the great news about Mr. None.


Hey Sun!!  Any 4th plans???


Picnic, cookout, watch the NASCAR race, & try to keep the dogs calm during the fireworks.  Oh yeah, maybe some shopping.  :lol:

I sent you a letter yesterday.  While I was sealing it and putting on the stamp, Margaritaville came on the radio.  I had to giggle b/c I remember what you said about Jimmy Buffett.   :lol:  :lol:

Do you & Mr Red have any big plans for the 4th?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on June 30, 2006, 05:09:11 PM
Quote from: "SunnyinTX"
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"
I am OFF for the next four days - yipee!

I think it SUCKS (sorry Klaas) that anybody has to work Monday!

ESPECIALLY - Mrs. Red (White and Blue).

We need to reevaluate our priorities in this society.


Have a good time off FM.....it started raining here and it's predicted to rain for the next 4 days.....oh well.....we need the rain! <sigh>


I think we are going to get some rain too!

Rained like the dickens when I was out to lunch!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on June 30, 2006, 05:10:20 PM
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"
I LOVE THIRDSTRIKE!

There I've said it!


Awwww...that's sweet!!  You've embarassed me though... :oops:  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on June 30, 2006, 05:10:26 PM
Quote from: "SunnyinTX"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Good afternoon Monkeys!

Wishing everyone a great long week end! 8)


Hi Jacque.....same to you...what are your plans for the long weekend


Well plans were to go down the shore for most of the week end, then have some friends over my place on Tuesday.

Had to have emergency oral surgery this morning and right now I'm sitting here with an ice pack on my puffy cheek.... :cry:

So I'll just see how it goes.....

But at least I have the next four days off! :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on June 30, 2006, 05:11:20 PM
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"
I LOVE THIRDSTRIKE!

There I've said it!


Awwww...that's sweet!!  You've embarassed me though... :oops:  :wink:


But, but, but you gotta love a guy who won't be amish cause he loves TV too much!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: SunnyinTX on June 30, 2006, 05:11:34 PM
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"
Quote from: "SunnyinTX"


Have a good time off FM.....it started raining here and it's predicted to rain for the next 4 days.....oh well.....we need the rain! <sigh>


I think we are going to get some rain too!

Rained like the dickens when I was out to lunch!


I know Snoopys still on vacation...but did you give a menu for today!!!   :D You need to post your menus on Friday for the next week! :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Houdini on June 30, 2006, 05:12:03 PM
Thirdstrike wrote:
Quote
Awwww...that's sweet!! You've embarassed me though...



How come you get all the goils, and they just tell me to disappear! :?

Oh yeah, it might be my name. :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: SunnyinTX on June 30, 2006, 05:12:38 PM
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"
I LOVE THIRDSTRIKE!

There I've said it!


Awwww...that's sweet!!  You've embarassed me though... :oops:  :wink:


watch out TS...she is trying to steal you away from me....Mermaids are like that ya know :wink: ...besides she doesn't jiggle!! :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: SunnyinTX on June 30, 2006, 05:13:44 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "SunnyinTX"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Good afternoon Monkeys!

Wishing everyone a great long week end! 8)


Hi Jacque.....same to you...what are your plans for the long weekend


Well plans were to go down the shore for most of the week end, then have some friends over my place on Tuesday.

Had to have emergency oral surgery this morning and right now I'm sitting here with an ice pack on my puffy cheek.... :cry:

So I'll just see how it goes.....

OUCH!  I hope you are in no pain...we were hoping to go to the beach too...but it looks like the rain will prevent that.

But at least I have the next four days off! :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Peaches on June 30, 2006, 05:14:07 PM
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"
where is Metro - is the bar open?


I don't know about Metro but it's certainly beer-thirty here at my house!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on June 30, 2006, 05:14:50 PM
Quote from: "Houdini"
Thirdstrike wrote:
Quote
Awwww...that's sweet!! You've embarassed me though...



How come you get all the goils, and they just tell me to disappear! :?

Oh yeah, it might be my name. :shock:


It's all in the game man...it's all in the game!!  ;)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on June 30, 2006, 05:16:06 PM
This just posted in the front page area by GRANDE;

ALERT - PLEASE DIRECT THIS TO COLUMBO!

Look what we have here, Plainview! Florida, Inc. (HIDDEN IN PLAINVIEW) !! Same EXACT PRINCIPAL BUSINESS ADDRESS AS ARUBA ALOE OF AMERICA !!!!!!!

701 Brickell Avenue >

PLAINVIEW FLORIDA, INC.

——————————————————————————–

PRINCIPAL ADDRESS
XXX BRICKELL AVE., SUITE XXXX
MIAMI FL 33131
Changed 03/28/1989

——————————————————————————–

MAILING ADDRESS
XXX BRICKELL AVE., SUITE XXXX
MIAMI FL 33131
Changed 03/28/1989

Officer/Director Detail Name & Address Title
SAMANDER, GEORGE
XXXX CORAL WAY, S-XXX

MIAMI FL PD
SAMANDER, JOHNNY ISSA
XXXX CORAL WAY, S-XXX

MIAMI FL DPS
SAIEH JASSIR, ABDALA
XXXX CORAL WAY S-XXX

MIAMI FL VP
MARTIN, PEDRO A.
XXX BRICKELL AVE, S-XXXX

MIAMI FL VP

____________________________________________________-

Foreign Profit

PLAINVIEW CORPORATION N.V.

——————————————————————————–

PRINCIPAL ADDRESS
C/O PEDRO A. MARTIN, ESQ.
XXX SO. BISCAYNE BLVD., STE. XXXX
MIAMI FL 33131
Changed 03/31/1988

——————————————————————————–

MAILING ADDRESS
C/O PEDRO A. MARTIN, ESQ.
XXX XX BISCAYNE BLVD., STE. XXXX
MIAMI FL 33131
Changed 03/31/1988

Document Number
853411 FEI Number
980057279 Date Filed
07/12/1982
State
Status
INACTIVE Effective Date
NONE
Last Event
CONVERSION Event Date Filed
07/29/1988 Event Effective Date
NONE

——————————————————————————–

Registered Agent
Name & Address
MARTIN, PEDRO A
XXX SO. BISCAYNE BLVD., STE. XXXX
MIAMI FL 33131
Address Changed: 03/31/1988

——————————————————————————–

Officer/Director Detail Name & Address Title
STATEN MANAGEMENT N.V.
XXXXX
CURACAO, N.A. D

SAIEH, ABDALA
XXXX COUNTRY CLUD DR
NO. MIAMI BEACH FL ATF

SAIEH, MOISES
XXXX W. COUNTRY CLUB DR
NO. MIAMI BEACH FL A

MARTIN, PEDRO A.
XXXX BISCAYNE BLVD #XXX

MIAMI FL


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on June 30, 2006, 05:16:10 PM
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"
I LOVE THIRDSTRIKE!

There I've said it!


Awwww...that's sweet!!  You've embarassed me though... :oops:  :wink:


But, but, but you gotta love a guy who won't be amish cause he loves TV too much!


Then, I must love you too!!  Because, you gotta love a girl who acknowledges the importrance of a man's love for electronics...;)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Houdini on June 30, 2006, 05:16:30 PM
Thirdstrike wrote:
Quote
It's all in the game man...it's all in the game!!


You should write a song. :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Houdini on June 30, 2006, 05:17:44 PM
Thirdstrike wrote:
Quote
Then, I must love you too!! Because, you gotta love a girl who acknowledges the importrance of a man's love for electronics...


And how about a girl who loves electronics.

No wait, that's something different. :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on June 30, 2006, 05:21:51 PM
Quote from: "Houdini"
Thirdstrike wrote:
Quote
Then, I must love you too!! Because, you gotta love a girl who acknowledges the importrance of a man's love for electronics...


And how about a girl who loves electronics.

No wait, that's something different. :shock:


Hold on Houdini....

XXX is awesome and the girls love him.

But............

We love you too!  Aye Matey! :lol:  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: SunnyinTX on June 30, 2006, 05:22:41 PM
???? Has it ever been established who Carlos, the Columbian was working for? Is he a gardner? Where was he living? Do gardners live at the houses of people they work for?

help me out here PLEASE!!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on June 30, 2006, 05:23:04 PM
Quote from: "SunnyinTX"
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"
Quote from: "SunnyinTX"


Have a good time off FM.....it started raining here and it's predicted to rain for the next 4 days.....oh well.....we need the rain! <sigh>


I think we are going to get some rain too!

Rained like the dickens when I was out to lunch!


I know Snoopys still on vacation...but did you give a menu for today!!!   :D You need to post your menus on Friday for the next week! :wink:


If any of you have not tried the Johnsonville Irish sausage they are great on the grill.  and the brats are the best too!  I am having everybody over on Sunday -

Aside from the brats, sausage and Dogs we are having:

Corn and black bean salsa w/ chips
Watermelon (Spiked)
Blueberry Cherry Pie/Cheesecake
Pasta Salad with Artichokes, Marinated mushrooms, olives, pepperocini and roasted red peppers
Spinach Dip (in the Pumpernickel bread)

Super easy stuff! Very Casual!


Tonight I am ordering a pizza!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Houdini on June 30, 2006, 05:24:31 PM
Jacqueline wrote:
Quote
We love you too! Aye Matey!



WELL, SHIVER ME TIMBERS!!!!!!



See TS, I got game.  It must be hereditary! :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on June 30, 2006, 05:24:34 PM
More posted on the front page by GRANDE;

LOOK UP PEDRO MARTIN UNDER REGISTERED AGENTS IN THE FLORIDA DIVISION OF CORPORATIONS SEARCH AND SEE WHAT YOU FIND!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

ALSO LOOK UP ARUBA ALOE OF AMERICA AS WELL AND COMPARE THE ADDRESSES!!!!!!!!!!

Perdro is the listed officer for > PLAINVIEW FLORIDA NV!!!!!!!!!!

YOU MIGHT ALSO BE INTERESTED IN THE DADE COUNTY RECORDS ON PEDRO !

I AM ABSOLUTELY SHOCKED !!!!!!!!!!!!!

*********************************************
PLAINVIEW INC. = BRICKELL AVENUE, MIAMI FLORIDA

PRINCIPAL BUSINESS ADDRESS FOR ARUBA ALOE OF AMERICA =

701 BRICKELL AVENUE SUITE xxxx

PRINCIPAL BUSINESS ADDRESS FOR PLAINVIEW INC. =

701 BRICKELL AVENUE SUITE XXXX

WHERE WAS THAT PAULUS WENT IN MIAMI ??????????????


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on June 30, 2006, 05:25:43 PM
Quote from: "SunnyinTX"
???? Has it ever been established who Carlos, the Columbian was working for? Is he a gardner? Where was he living? Do gardners live at the houses of people they work for?

help me out here PLEASE!!!!


NO, NOT ESTABLISHED


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Peaches on June 30, 2006, 05:26:06 PM
Mermaid, is that recipe for corn/blackbean salsa  in the Monkey cook book?

If not, can you post it?  I would love to make that.

Anybody seen Beans today?  I have a Runza-related question.

Pardon me for being off topic.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: SunnyinTX on June 30, 2006, 05:26:15 PM
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"
Quote from: "SunnyinTX"


I know Snoopys still on vacation...but did you give a menu for today!!!   :D You need to post your menus on Friday for the next week! :wink:


If any of you have not tried the Johnsonville Irish sausage they are great on the grill.  and the brats are the best too!  I am having everybody over on Sunday -

Aside from the brats, sausage and Dogs we are having:

Corn and black bean salsa w/ chips
Watermelon (Spiked)
Blueberry Cherry Pie/Cheesecake
Pasta Salad with Artichokes, Marinated mushrooms, olives, pepperocini and roasted red peppers
Spinach Dip (in the Pumpernickel bread)

Super easy stuff! Very Casual!


Tonight I am ordering a pizza!


What time should we arrive?  We love the Johnsonville Brats too.... :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: SunnyinTX on June 30, 2006, 05:27:46 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "SunnyinTX"
???? Has it ever been established who Carlos, the Columbian was working for? Is he a gardner? Where was he living? Do gardners live at the houses of people they work for?

help me out here PLEASE!!!!


NO, NOT ESTABLISHED


thanks....I think this might be important....so if anyone finds any of this out please let me know.....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on June 30, 2006, 05:29:00 PM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Mermaid, is that recipe for corn/blackbean salsa  in the Monkey cook book?

If not, can you post it?  I would love to make that.

Anybody seen Beans today?  I have a Runza-related question.

Pardon me for being off topic.


No not mine if in Cookbook!

I'll post it From Home.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on June 30, 2006, 05:29:04 PM
All this talk of food, making me hungry.

But it's gonna be pastina and butter for me.... :wink:

See you guys later!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on June 30, 2006, 05:31:13 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
All this talk of food, making me hungry.

But it's gonna be pastina and butter for me.... :wink:

See you guys later!


ahhhhhhhhhhh Pastina!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: WidgetTheMidget on June 30, 2006, 05:31:52 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
This just posted in the front page area by GRANDE;

ALERT - PLEASE DIRECT THIS TO COLUMBO!

Look what we have here, Plainview! Florida, Inc. (HIDDEN IN PLAINVIEW) !! Same EXACT PRINCIPAL BUSINESS ADDRESS AS ARUBA ALOE OF AMERICA !!!!!!!

701 Brickell Avenue >

PLAINVIEW FLORIDA, INC.

——————————————————————————–

PRINCIPAL ADDRESS
XXX BRICKELL AVE., SUITE XXXX
MIAMI FL 33131
Changed 03/28/1989

——————————————————————————–

MAILING ADDRESS
XXX BRICKELL AVE., SUITE XXXX
MIAMI FL 33131
Changed 03/28/1989

Officer/Director Detail Name & Address Title
SAMANDER, GEORGE
XXXX CORAL WAY, S-XXX

MIAMI FL PD
SAMANDER, JOHNNY ISSA
XXXX CORAL WAY, S-XXX

MIAMI FL DPS
SAIEH JASSIR, ABDALA
XXXX CORAL WAY S-XXX

MIAMI FL VP
MARTIN, PEDRO A.
XXX BRICKELL AVE, S-XXXX

MIAMI FL VP

____________________________________________________-

Foreign Profit

PLAINVIEW CORPORATION N.V.

——————————————————————————–

PRINCIPAL ADDRESS
C/O PEDRO A. MARTIN, ESQ.
XXX SO. BISCAYNE BLVD., STE. XXXX
MIAMI FL 33131
Changed 03/31/1988

——————————————————————————–

MAILING ADDRESS
C/O PEDRO A. MARTIN, ESQ.
XXX XX BISCAYNE BLVD., STE. XXXX
MIAMI FL 33131
Changed 03/31/1988

Document Number
853411 FEI Number
980057279 Date Filed
07/12/1982
State
Status
INACTIVE Effective Date
NONE
Last Event
CONVERSION Event Date Filed
07/29/1988 Event Effective Date
NONE

——————————————————————————–

Registered Agent
Name & Address
MARTIN, PEDRO A
XXX SO. BISCAYNE BLVD., STE. XXXX
MIAMI FL 33131
Address Changed: 03/31/1988

——————————————————————————–

Officer/Director Detail Name & Address Title
STATEN MANAGEMENT N.V.
XXXXX
CURACAO, N.A. D

SAIEH, ABDALA
XXXX COUNTRY CLUD DR
NO. MIAMI BEACH FL ATF

SAIEH, MOISES
XXXX W. COUNTRY CLUB DR
NO. MIAMI BEACH FL A

MARTIN, PEDRO A.
XXXX BISCAYNE BLVD #XXX

MIAMI FL


Klaas ..........

What PLayer In The Case Has Something To Do With Aloe ..............

 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Houdini on June 30, 2006, 05:32:10 PM
flyingmermaid wrote:
Quote
ahhhhhhhhhhh Pastina!



Okay, WTH is Pastina?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on June 30, 2006, 05:32:19 PM
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
All this talk of food, making me hungry.

But it's gonna be pastina and butter for me.... :wink:

See you guys later!


ahhhhhhhhhhh Pastina!


Yeahhhhhhhhh comfort food!  LOL


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on June 30, 2006, 05:34:26 PM
Quote from: "Houdini"
flyingmermaid wrote:
Quote
ahhhhhhhhhhh Pastina!



Okay, WTH is Pastina?


Itty bitty pasta that they feed babies.

But as kids we loved it...

In the wintertime we would cool it by an open window, with lots a butta on top.

yummie.............


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Houdini on June 30, 2006, 05:36:45 PM
Jacqueline wrote:
Quote
Itty bitty pasta that they feed babies.

But as kids we loved it...

In the wintertime we would cool it by an open window, with lots a butta on top.

yummie.............


Oh Gawd, I can hear my arteries clogging, just talking about it.


Sounds delicious!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: sharon on June 30, 2006, 05:37:29 PM
Brickell Avenue is the basically the International Financial district of Miami. It is just south of 'downtown' and as for work and density purposes it has replaced downtown.

The growth of this area in the past 15 years is phenomenal.

Several miles of tall glass hi rises. International banks, major law firms. Hi rise -- mix use. And hi rise residential. Predominately -- but not solely -- European and South American. I know many 'yuppies' who work in downtown that live on Brickell as well.

5 star hotels -- Mandarin Oriental, Conrad Hilton, JW Marriot, 4 Seasons.

Brickell Avenue runs along Biscayne Bay, from the south side of downtown, until the bridge over to Key Biscayne.

In other words -- very hi rent district.

I'm just trying to help you visualize the area.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on June 30, 2006, 05:37:36 PM
Widget - there has been discussion, I don't remember if it was Shango/Simian or someone else.  Something like look to the center of the island.  Aloe has been mentioned before in the Code Talkers thread I believe.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: San on June 30, 2006, 05:39:02 PM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Mermaid, is that recipe for corn/blackbean salsa  in the Monkey cook book?

If not, can you post it?  I would love to make that.

Anybody seen Beans today?  I have a Runza-related question.

Pardon me for being off topic.

Peaches there is a recipe that pippy posted for ROASTED CORN & BLACK BEAN SALSA.  Is that the one?  Let me know and I'll post it for you.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on June 30, 2006, 05:40:21 PM
Quote from: "Houdini"
Jacqueline wrote:
Quote
Itty bitty pasta that they feed babies.

But as kids we loved it...

In the wintertime we would cool it by an open window, with lots a butta on top.

yummie.............


Oh Gawd, I can hear my arteries clogging, just talking about it.


Sounds delicious!


It really is good, and for about 15 minutes takes me back to my childhood.

Plus no chewing involved!  LOL

See ya'll later.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on June 30, 2006, 05:41:27 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Widget - there has been discussion, I don't remember if it was Shango/Simian or someone else.  Something like look to the center of the island.  Aloe has been mentioned before in the Code Talkers thread I believe.


Wasn't there a dude nicknamed "Aloe Man" on the island?  Not sure who it actually was though, but I do remember references to him selling drugs as well...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: WidgetTheMidget on June 30, 2006, 05:42:10 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Widget - there has been discussion, I don't remember if it was Shango/Simian or someone else.  Something like look to the center of the island.  Aloe has been mentioned before in the Code Talkers thread I believe.


Is'nt Posner An Owner Of An Aloe Company ....................

 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: sharon on June 30, 2006, 05:43:11 PM
Quote from: "WidgetTheMidget"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Widget - there has been discussion, I don't remember if it was Shango/Simian or someone else.  Something like look to the center of the island.  Aloe has been mentioned before in the Code Talkers thread I believe.


Is'nt Posner An Owner Of An Aloe Company ....................

 8)


Yes.

Louis Posner


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: WidgetTheMidget on June 30, 2006, 05:44:23 PM
Quote from: "sharon"
Quote from: "WidgetTheMidget"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Widget - there has been discussion, I don't remember if it was Shango/Simian or someone else.  Something like look to the center of the island.  Aloe has been mentioned before in the Code Talkers thread I believe.


Is'nt Posner An Owner Of An Aloe Company ....................

 8)


Yes.

Louis Posner


THats Posners Son Is'nt He ...........

 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: sharon on June 30, 2006, 05:45:37 PM
Sorry -- Luis Posner.

Bought from the Eman family.

I remember we had most of this info on BFN somewhere -- but that sight is not accessible right now.

Sorry Widget -- and I need to leave for a bit.

I think it's actually called Aruba Aloe Company.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on June 30, 2006, 05:48:12 PM
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "Houdini"
Thirdstrike wrote:
Quote
So, you're a govt worker Mrs Red? Can you get me a break on my taxes??


You could always "go Amish" TS.  Declare yourself a non-profit religious organization.

It's against the Constitution to mix Church and State. :lol:


Not sure I want to do that Houdini!  I love TV too much... :wink:


I am not a govt worker... but the Federal Courts are open... then I have to hang out at the office... LOL.... low woman on the totem pole I guess


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on June 30, 2006, 05:49:12 PM
Mrs. you have mail!

C U later..

Pastina almost ready!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: sharon on June 30, 2006, 05:49:40 PM
I don't think it's his son.

I'm not sure they are related or not.

All I remember right now is that Luis has a brother -- Israel I think is his name, and he is doctor. They live on Aruba.

If I remember the pictures....if they are related to M, it is definetly an Aruban part of the family. They do not look to be from Chicago, but I could be wrong.

We actually had the pictures here a long time ago -- SandraK provided the link.

Sorry Widget -- wish I could be of more help.

Sharon


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Peaches on June 30, 2006, 05:50:55 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Peaches"
Mermaid, is that recipe for corn/blackbean salsa  in the Monkey cook book?

If not, can you post it?  I would love to make that.

Anybody seen Beans today?  I have a Runza-related question.

Pardon me for being off topic.

Peaches there is a recipe that pippy posted for ROASTED CORN & BLACK BEAN SALSA.  Is that the one?  Let me know and I'll post it for you.


I'll have to check my cookbook.  I'm just always curious about what's for dinner at Mermaid's house because it's always more imaginative than what I'm having.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on June 30, 2006, 05:51:53 PM
Quote from: "Houdini"
Thirdstrike wrote:
Quote
Awwww...that's sweet!! You've embarassed me though...



How come you get all the goils, and they just tell me to disappear! :?

Oh yeah, it might be my name. :shock:


I love you both... LOL


 I am sorry my sistah is not feeling well... and Sun, just hanging out and going to the beach.. and fireworks....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: wreck on June 30, 2006, 05:52:37 PM
On the front page post -- the names of "Mansur" and "Posner" jumped out at me (they share the same corporate address in Miami)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Easywriter on June 30, 2006, 05:52:42 PM
Quote from: "SunnyinTX"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "SunnyinTX"
???? Has it ever been established who Carlos, the Columbian was working for? Is he a gardner? Where was he living? Do gardners live at the houses of people they work for?

help me out here PLEASE!!!!


NO, NOT ESTABLISHED


thanks....I think this might be important....so if anyone finds any of this out please let me know.....


He was an unemployed construction worker living with his "wife" in an apartment, which he was about to lose for back rent.  Had a history of petty crimes, but nothing major.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: SunnyinTX on June 30, 2006, 05:56:15 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"

He was an unemployed construction worker living with his "wife" in an apartment, which he was about to lose for back rent.  Had a history of petty crimes, but nothing major.


hi EASY and thanks!!! So waht are your thoughts on him....did he have info and evidence....and held in the Aruban jail longer enough for him to 'decided' to change his mind :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Jerry from Ohio on June 30, 2006, 05:57:23 PM
Aloe man was a guy that supposedly went up and down the beach selling lotion to the tourists,  but it was rumored that he also sold drugs too .
 



Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Widget - there has been discussion, I don't remember if it was Shango/Simian or someone else.  Something like look to the center of the island.  Aloe has been mentioned before in the Code Talkers thread I believe.


Wasn't there a dude nicknamed "Aloe Man" on the island?  Not sure who it actually was though, but I do remember references to him selling drugs as well...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on June 30, 2006, 05:59:21 PM
Quote from: "SunnyinTX"
???? Has it ever been established who Carlos, the Columbian was working for? Is he a gardner? Where was he living? Do gardners live at the houses of people they work for?

help me out here PLEASE!!!!


wasn't it julia???


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: wreck on June 30, 2006, 06:02:02 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "SunnyinTX"
???? Has it ever been established who Carlos, the Columbian was working for? Is he a gardner? Where was he living? Do gardners live at the houses of people they work for?

help me out here PLEASE!!!!


wasn't it julia???


Back in my RWV days the "gardener" supposedly as an employee of one of the Mansurs (either Jossy or his brother.) I never heard that the "Columbian" worked for anyone -- only that he was an "illegal."


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Peaches on June 30, 2006, 06:02:16 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "SunnyinTX"
???? Has it ever been established who Carlos, the Columbian was working for? Is he a gardner? Where was he living? Do gardners live at the houses of people they work for?

help me out here PLEASE!!!!


wasn't it julia???


THank you.  That's what I thought.  I was snooping around trying to find where I read that to no avail.  I don't know where he was living.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on June 30, 2006, 06:03:53 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "Houdini"
Thirdstrike wrote:
Quote
Awwww...that's sweet!! You've embarassed me though...



How come you get all the goils, and they just tell me to disappear! :?

Oh yeah, it might be my name. :shock:


I love you both... LOL


The feeling is mutual Mrs. Red!!  ;)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on June 30, 2006, 06:04:32 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Mrs. you have mail!

C U later..

Pastina almost ready!


feel better sistah...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: wreck on June 30, 2006, 06:04:40 PM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "SunnyinTX"
???? Has it ever been established who Carlos, the Columbian was working for? Is he a gardner? Where was he living? Do gardners live at the houses of people they work for?

help me out here PLEASE!!!!


wasn't it julia???


THank you.  That's what I thought.  I was snooping around trying to find where I read that to no avail.  I don't know where he was living.


I thought the "gardener" was the "witness" that saw 3 boys in a car by the "pond" that night.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Jerry from Ohio on June 30, 2006, 06:05:41 PM
Quote from: "wreck"
On the front page post -- the names of "Mansur" and "Posner" jumped out at me (they share the same corporate address in Miami)


   That is not real  surpriseing  Wreack as they probably both come and know each other from Aruba  and considering that office rents are at a premium in that Part of Miami it might make sense to share a space instead of go it alone it is a usual Biz practice when one or the other dosent need all the space that they have .
  Just a possable explanation .
  Jerry from Ohio


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Frijole on June 30, 2006, 06:06:08 PM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Mermaid, is that recipe for corn/blackbean salsa  in the Monkey cook book?

If not, can you post it?  I would love to make that.

Anybody seen Beans today?  I have a Runza-related question.

Pardon me for being off topic.


Heh girl -

I'm here for a few... gotta go to a barbeque.  Just got back into town... went to Lincoln.  Hope I can anwer it!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on June 30, 2006, 06:06:54 PM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "SunnyinTX"
???? Has it ever been established who Carlos, the Columbian was working for? Is he a gardner? Where was he living? Do gardners live at the houses of people they work for?

help me out here PLEASE!!!!


wasn't it julia???


THank you.  That's what I thought.  I was snooping around trying to find where I read that to no avail.  I don't know where he was living.



I thought she said in it in a post or on Rita.....


Title: !!
Post by: mrs. red on June 30, 2006, 06:08:14 PM
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "Houdini"
Thirdstrike wrote:
Quote
Awwww...that's sweet!! You've embarassed me though...



How come you get all the goils, and they just tell me to disappear! :?

Oh yeah, it might be my name. :shock:


I love you both... LOL


The feeling is mutual Mrs. Red!!  ;)


thanks Third!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on June 30, 2006, 06:08:47 PM
Quote from: "wreck"
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "SunnyinTX"
???? Has it ever been established who Carlos, the Columbian was working for? Is he a gardner? Where was he living? Do gardners live at the houses of people they work for?

help me out here PLEASE!!!!


wasn't it julia???


THank you.  That's what I thought.  I was snooping around trying to find where I read that to no avail.  I don't know where he was living.


I thought the "gardener" was the "witness" that saw 3 boys in a car by the "pond" that night.


yes by the raquet club...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on June 30, 2006, 06:11:33 PM
Sunny asked my to post this map showing where JR residence is.  The thought was could the gardener witness worked for Renfro.  Not based on the information we have been given, IMO:

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/Renfromap.jpg)

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/arubacase2.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: SunnyinTX on June 30, 2006, 06:11:51 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "SunnyinTX"
???? Has it ever been established who Carlos, the Columbian was working for? Is he a gardner? Where was he living? Do gardners live at the houses of people they work for?

help me out here PLEASE!!!!


wasn't it julia???


that is what I have been hearing....he was working for her as a gardener............perhaps because he waas unemployed in the construction business??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: KatzHome on June 30, 2006, 06:12:05 PM
Quote from: "SunnyinTX"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
I think I see Sunny out there... she needs to get caught up!!


WOOHOO I am here!! Can anyone see me!  WOOHOO Y'ALL....don't make me do no southern Cussing!!! :D


Hey Sunny ~ I see ya!

Okies ~ I'm in for a nap Monkeys ~ and since it's the start of the weekend...


Title: Happy Independence Day!
Post by: KatzHome on June 30, 2006, 06:13:40 PM
(http://i27.photobucket.com/albums/c186/MarysKid/4th_of_July.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: SunnyinTX on June 30, 2006, 06:14:23 PM
Quote from: "wreck"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "SunnyinTX"
???? Has it ever been established who Carlos, the Columbian was working for? Is he a gardner? Where was he living? Do gardners live at the houses of people they work for?

help me out here PLEASE!!!!


wasn't it julia???


Back in my RWV days the "gardener" supposedly as an employee of one of the Mansurs (either Jossy or his brother.) I never heard that the "Columbian" worked for anyone -- only that he was an "illegal."


thanks....I heard the gardener was employed at sometime by renfro....so this illegal....is he indeed married or not....is his wife Aruban?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on June 30, 2006, 06:16:17 PM
Ok... some of us seem to recall that the gardner worked for Julia.... and some recall he supposedly worked for jossy....

but dang that makes the gardner credible if they were near there...  :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on June 30, 2006, 06:18:28 PM
OK>.. I am draggin Red outta here for a while and running off to eat... save my place!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: wreck on June 30, 2006, 06:20:02 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Ok... some of us seem to recall that the gardner worked for Julia.... and some recall he supposedly worked for jossy....

but dang that makes the gardner credible if they were near there...  :shock:

I am not sure! I just remember the "darkside" posters were saying the gardener worked for one of the Mansurs thus he was not credible in their eyes.  Hell, if he actually worked for Julia -- he really has no credibility!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: SunnyinTX on June 30, 2006, 06:21:15 PM
Quote from: "KatzHome"
Quote from: "SunnyinTX"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
I think I see Sunny out there... she needs to get caught up!!


WOOHOO I am here!! Can anyone see me!  WOOHOO Y'ALL....don't make me do no southern Cussing!!! :D


Hey Sunny ~ I see ya!

Okies ~ I'm in for a nap Monkeys ~ and since it's the start of the weekend...


Hi Katz :D ...have a good nap....TTYL


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on June 30, 2006, 06:21:35 PM
There is nothing indicating that this Columbian witness is a gardener of any kind.  It's been mentioned on other sites that he may be a construction worker.  

The original gardener witness has been accused of working for Jossy and JR.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: oldfart on June 30, 2006, 06:22:03 PM
Hi Monkeys...

What's UP if anything?

I thought the gardener worked for one of Jossy's relatives ??
Sounds like a question for Mr. Woods thread.
Heck he may have worked for both  :shock:
JMO of course


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on June 30, 2006, 06:23:17 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
There is nothing indicating that this Columbian witness is a gardener of any kind.  It's been mentioned on other sites that he may be a construction worker.  

The original gardener witness has been accused of working for Jossy and JR.


 I thought we were talking about the original gardner.... I am confused...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on June 30, 2006, 06:24:12 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "klaasend"
There is nothing indicating that this Columbian witness is a gardener of any kind.  It's been mentioned on other sites that he may be a construction worker.  

The original gardener witness has been accused of working for Jossy and JR.


 I thought we were talking about the original gardner.... I am confused...


So am I, lol  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on June 30, 2006, 06:24:17 PM
OK>.. I am really outta here.... bye monkeys

TTYL... keep the faith!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Peaches on June 30, 2006, 06:27:14 PM
Quote from: "Frijole"
Quote from: "Peaches"
Mermaid, is that recipe for corn/blackbean salsa  in the Monkey cook book?

If not, can you post it?  I would love to make that.

Anybody seen Beans today?  I have a Runza-related question.

Pardon me for being off topic.


Heh girl -

I'm here for a few... gotta go to a barbeque.  Just got back into town... went to Lincoln.  Hope I can anwer it!!


How many of those loaves of frozen bread do I need for the 1 lb of hamburger?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Peaches on June 30, 2006, 06:29:25 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "klaasend"
There is nothing indicating that this Columbian witness is a gardener of any kind.  It's been mentioned on other sites that he may be a construction worker.  

The original gardener witness has been accused of working for Jossy and JR.


 I thought we were talking about the original gardner.... I am confused...


So am I, lol  :lol:  :lol:


Holy cow!  I thought it was just me.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: oldfart on June 30, 2006, 06:30:06 PM
Klaasend
You think you are confused...
my last post said Mr. Wards thread  could you please change that to
Mr. Woods thread :oops:  :roll:
So Many players and no program card to follow and I get  :?
TIA


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on June 30, 2006, 06:30:36 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Ok... some of us seem to recall that the gardner worked for Julia.... and some recall he supposedly worked for jossy....

but dang that makes the gardner credible if they were near there...  :shock:


Now, are we talking about the original gardner who said he saw the boys in the car that night?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on June 30, 2006, 06:34:44 PM
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Ok... some of us seem to recall that the gardner worked for Julia.... and some recall he supposedly worked for jossy....

but dang that makes the gardner credible if they were near there...  :shock:


Now, are we talking about the original gardner who said he saw the boys in the car that night?


that was what I thought... but in any event, the thing is that that map would make the first gardner a little more credible... IMO...

remember every single person assoicated with this has been "discredited" in soe way including Helen Ljuenez (sp) who was called mentally distrubed by julia... I mean at this point anything is possible..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on June 30, 2006, 06:34:46 PM
Quote from: "oldfart"
Klaasend
You think you are confused...
my last post said Mr. Wards thread  could you please change that to
Mr. Woods thread :oops:  :roll:
So Many players and no program card to follow and I get  :?
TIA


Fixed  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Frijole on June 30, 2006, 06:37:12 PM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "Frijole"
Quote from: "Peaches"
Mermaid, is that recipe for corn/blackbean salsa  in the Monkey cook book?

If not, can you post it?  I would love to make that.

Anybody seen Beans today?  I have a Runza-related question.

Pardon me for being off topic.


Heh girl -

I'm here for a few... gotta go to a barbeque.  Just got back into town... went to Lincoln.  Hope I can anwer it!!


How many of those loaves of frozen bread do I need for the 1 lb of hamburger?


LOL  Looking... BRB   :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: wreck on June 30, 2006, 06:37:46 PM
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Ok... some of us seem to recall that the gardner worked for Julia.... and some recall he supposedly worked for jossy....

but dang that makes the gardner credible if they were near there...  :shock:


Now, are we talking about the original gardner who said he saw the boys in the car that night?

Okay, the way I understand things:
1) The original person to see 3 boys in a car near the pond at the Racquet Club was a "gardner." Unclear who employed him -- either a Mansur or Julia Renfro
2) The recent "detainee" was a witness to Joran carrying and raping Natalee at the beach. He is a "Columbian", an "Illegal' and a "Construction Worker."
The 2 are unrelated.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: oldfart on June 30, 2006, 06:39:06 PM
Quote from: "wreck"
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Ok... some of us seem to recall that the gardner worked for Julia.... and some recall he supposedly worked for jossy....

but dang that makes the gardner credible if they were near there...  :shock:


Now, are we talking about the original gardner who said he saw the boys in the car that night?

Okay, the way I understand things:
1) The original person to see 3 boys in a car near the pond at the Racquet Club was a "gardner." Unclear who employed him -- either a Mansur or Julia Renfro
2) The recent "detainee" was a witness to Joran carrying and raping Natalee at the beach. He is a "Columbian", an "Illegal' and a "Construction Worker."
The 2 are unrelated.

Wreck
that is my take also...   thank you... :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Peaches on June 30, 2006, 06:40:45 PM
Beans, my frozen bread isn't rising fast enough.

For the casserole, it says bake at 300.  For how long?
TY


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on June 30, 2006, 06:40:45 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Ok... some of us seem to recall that the gardner worked for Julia.... and some recall he supposedly worked for jossy....

but dang that makes the gardner credible if they were near there...  :shock:


Now, are we talking about the original gardner who said he saw the boys in the car that night?


that was what I thought... but in any event, the thing is that that map would make the first gardner a little more credible... IMO...


Well, if that's the case, I seem to remember the initial reports were he was employed by Jossy.  At least again...that's what I remember.  Anyone know any different?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on June 30, 2006, 06:42:47 PM
Quote from: "oldfart"
Quote from: "wreck"
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Ok... some of us seem to recall that the gardner worked for Julia.... and some recall he supposedly worked for jossy....

but dang that makes the gardner credible if they were near there...  :shock:


Now, are we talking about the original gardner who said he saw the boys in the car that night?

Okay, the way I understand things:
1) The original person to see 3 boys in a car near the pond at the Racquet Club was a "gardner." Unclear who employed him -- either a Mansur or Julia Renfro
2) The recent "detainee" was a witness to Joran carrying and raping Natalee at the beach. He is a "Columbian", an "Illegal' and a "Construction Worker."
The 2 are unrelated.

Wreck
that is my take also...   thank you... :)


Yeah, but now can't we pretty much eliminate the 2nd "witness" (who's admitted to lying) in this equation?  As far as I know, the gardner was never found to be lying...was he?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on June 30, 2006, 06:43:46 PM
but what if the Columbian did work as a gardner because he couldn't get anything else?  and if he did work for Julia... then it explains a lot...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on June 30, 2006, 06:44:27 PM
Quote from: "wreck"


Now, are we talking about the original gardner who said he saw the boys in the car that night?

Okay, the way I understand things:
1) The original person to see 3 boys in a car near the pond at the Racquet Club was a "gardner." Unclear who employed him -- either a Mansur or Julia Renfro
2) The recent "detainee" was a witness to Joran carrying and raping Natalee at the beach. He is a "Columbian", an "Illegal' and a "Construction Worker."
The 2 are unrelated.[/quote]

The original gardner witness was employed by Eric Mansur.  His SIL was vd Straatens secretary.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: wreck on June 30, 2006, 06:45:36 PM
Quote
Yeah, but now can't we pretty much eliminate the 2nd "witness" (who's admitted to lying) in this equation? As far as I know, the gardner was never found to be lying...was he?


Well, they are SAYING he admitted to lying. Me? --- I wouldn't be so quick to believe ANYTHING they claim now. Was he "PURSUADED" to change his story????? Who Knows?!!!!?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on June 30, 2006, 06:46:16 PM
Quote from: "wreck"
Quote
Yeah, but now can't we pretty much eliminate the 2nd "witness" (who's admitted to lying) in this equation? As far as I know, the gardner was never found to be lying...was he?


Well, they are SAYING he admitted to lying. Me? --- I wouldn't be so quick to believe ANYTHING they claim now. Was he "PURSUADED" to change his story????? Who Knows?!!!!?


which is what I am getting at...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: wreck on June 30, 2006, 06:48:07 PM
no spell check... "persuade" maybe?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on June 30, 2006, 06:48:45 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Sunny asked my to post this map showing where JR residence is.  The thought was could the gardener witness worked for Renfro.  Not based on the information we have been given, IMO:

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/Renfromap.jpg)

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/arubacase2.jpg)


Ok I am bringing this forward again... look at the map and the raquet club... how far is that from jvds' house???


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Frijole on June 30, 2006, 06:51:00 PM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Beans, my frozen bread isn't rising fast enough.

For the casserole, it says bake at 300.  For how long?
TY


You must be having Runza's tonite!  LOL

1.  Re frozen bread --- of course my recipe doesn't say and I can only remember I made a boat load and froze them.  That makes me think I used 2 loaves.  (hope I'm right)

2.  Re Casserole, since hamburger is already cooked - you are really just cooking the bread.  My recipe says til browned.  In another book it said 20 mins.  Hope that gives you a reference.

Good luck - I am getting hungry just thinking about them.   :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: oldfart on June 30, 2006, 06:53:13 PM
Quote from: "thirdstrike"


Yeah, but now can't we pretty much eliminate the 2nd "witness" (who's admitted to lying) in this equation?  As far as I know, the gardner was never found to be lying...was he?


Eliminate the 2nd witness  I would say so.  
1st witness IIRC  person in jail with Deepak said MY GRADENER saw you by the pond etc...
That why I remember that the gardener was employed by a relative of Jossy's.   Then they could not locate the guy(something about being deported also mixed in here)  but they did and he went before a Judge to give a sworn statement.. and mixed reports on how creditable he was.

Big question is where is he now?

You are good at words so ....how about posting a question in Art Woods thread on this subject? http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=10
(I'v already sent the address to Dana)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on June 30, 2006, 07:01:15 PM
Sunfreak - if you are still here, make sure you check the box that says keep me logged in.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Peaches on June 30, 2006, 07:02:45 PM
Quote from: "Frijole"
Quote from: "Peaches"
Beans, my frozen bread isn't rising fast enough.

For the casserole, it says bake at 300.  For how long?
TY


You must be having Runza's tonite!  LOL

1.  Re frozen bread --- of course my recipe doesn't say and I can only remember I made a boat load and froze them.  That makes me think I used 2 loaves.  (hope I'm right)

2.  Re Casserole, since hamburger is already cooked - you are really just cooking the bread.  My recipe says til browned.  In another book it said 20 mins.  Hope that gives you a reference.

Good luck - I am getting hungry just thinking about them.   :D


Thank you, dear.  
Go Big Red.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on June 30, 2006, 07:04:35 PM
Peaches I posted the Roasted corn andd Black Bean Salsa Recipe in the lounge under the runza's recipe for ya!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on June 30, 2006, 07:05:42 PM
Roasted Corn & Black Bean Salsa
Makes about 3 cups.
 
 
Ingredients  
1/2 - cup corn, fresh, canned, or frozen

1 - tablespoon butter

1 - medium tomato, chopped

1 - small red onion, chopped

1/2 - cup cooked black beans, rinsed and drained - I use drained rinsed canned black beans

1/4 - cup green or red bell pepper, chopped

2 - jalapeno chiles, seeded and diced

1 - garlic clove, minced

1 - teaspoon oregano

1/4 - teaspoon cumin seeds

1/4 - teaspoon cilantro, coarsely chopped

3 - tablespoons olive oil

2 - tablespoons lemon juice

1/4 - teaspoon salt
 
Directions  
In a hot skillet, melt butter.  Sauté corn until slightly browned.  Allow cooling for 30 minutes.
In a medium bowl, gently mix corn, tomato, onion, black beans, bell peppers, chiles, garlic, oregano, cumin, and cilantro.
In a separate mixing bowl, whisk olive oil and lemon juice together.  
Pour over corn and tomato mixture and toss very gently.  
Allow the salsa to sit 1 hour.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on June 30, 2006, 07:06:40 PM
but hey here it is again if anybody doesn't want to go to the lounge. :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on June 30, 2006, 07:18:23 PM
Just took a walk outside and I am amazed at how my Hybiscus, Hedge and Areca palms have come back thriving after the hurricane last year.  I remember thinking after the storm that we would have to landscape everything over again.

Mother nature is an amazing woman!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on June 30, 2006, 07:19:12 PM
Buncha Boring Monkeys! 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: justinsmama on June 30, 2006, 07:20:47 PM
To: AZLady, klaasend, lexie, mrs. red, ospainter, SunFreak2, thirdstrike-

This Thread Will Lock On Page 50!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: oldfart on June 30, 2006, 07:21:35 PM
Well Monkeys
I'm out of here for a bit...  Hope eveyone has a great evening and week-end.

It is Friday & payday which should be (http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c314/OldF/woohoo.gif)BUT today has been more like (http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c314/OldF/9ef3ab80.gif)

SYB all


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on June 30, 2006, 07:23:27 PM
Quote from: "oldfart"
You are good at words so ....how about posting a question in Art Woods thread on this subject? http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=10
(I'v already sent the address to Dana)


Good wityh words?  Me??  Although that's nice of you to say, I don't really think I am.  But, I'd have no problem posing a question to Mr. Woods...

What exactly would you like me to ask him?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on June 30, 2006, 07:24:24 PM
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"
Buncha Boring Monkeys! 8)


First you love me, now I'm boring?  Just like a woman...;)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on June 30, 2006, 07:25:07 PM
Quote from: "justinsmama"
To: AZLady, klaasend, lexie, mrs. red, ospainter, SunFreak2, thirdstrike-

This Thread Will Lock On Page 50!!!


Not even Justins can see me good thing there is no iggy button otherwise I would think I was iggy!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: justinsmama on June 30, 2006, 07:25:49 PM
Quote from: "oldfart"
Quote from: "thirdstrike"


Yeah, but now can't we pretty much eliminate the 2nd "witness" (who's admitted to lying) in this equation?  As far as I know, the gardner was never found to be lying...was he?


Eliminate the 2nd witness  I would say so.  
1st witness IIRC  person in jail with Deepak said MY GRADENER saw you by the pond etc...
That why I remember that the gardener was employed by a relative of Jossy's.   Then they could not locate the guy(something about being deported also mixed in here)  but they did and he went before a Judge to give a sworn statement.. and mixed reports on how creditable he was.

Big question is where is he now?

You are good at words so ....how about posting a question in Art Woods thread on this subject? http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=10
(I'v already sent the address to Dana)


Nope, he was not found to be lying (gard.). Renfro, as bondia, claimed vehemently that he was not a valid witness, was bogus, etc. She lied. What a surprise.

Anyone remember how she wanted us all to know that she has a rock garden? Maybe her espouso or shack up was the guy in jail. That is, if she has either.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on June 30, 2006, 07:26:38 PM
Sorry I was watching Judy Teunda and got all caught up in it... she makes me laugh...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on June 30, 2006, 07:26:54 PM
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"
Buncha Boring Monkeys! 8)


First you love me, now I'm boring?  Just like a woman...;)


I still Love ya but I am glad that you won't be Amish cause they will not let you wear your purple pants!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: justinsmama on June 30, 2006, 07:27:09 PM
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"
Quote from: "justinsmama"
To: AZLady, klaasend, lexie, mrs. red, ospainter, SunFreak2, thirdstrike-

This Thread Will Lock On Page 50!!!


Not even Justins can see me good thing there is no iggy button otherwise I would think I was iggy!


NO! Never! I lurve you, Mermaid! Your siggie was not on the main menu for threads!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on June 30, 2006, 07:28:00 PM
Justins I know htat Julia has a husband, but I don't know anything else about him....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on June 30, 2006, 07:28:33 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Sorry I was watching Judy Teunda and got all caught up in it... she makes me laugh...


Haven't heard her name in a LONG time Mrs. Red!  Hey...we've now known each other for a little while now.  Calling you "Mrs. Red" seems so formal.  Any chance of getting a first name??  ;)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: justinsmama on June 30, 2006, 07:28:37 PM
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"
but hey here it is again if anybody doesn't want to go to the lounge. :roll:


We've got a lounge again!!!! Yay!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on June 30, 2006, 07:28:58 PM
I lurve you too Justins but don't tell Third he thinks I love him!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: justinsmama on June 30, 2006, 07:29:19 PM
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Sorry I was watching Judy Teunda and got all caught up in it... she makes me laugh...


Haven't heard her name in a LONG time Mrs. Red!  Hey...we've now known each other for a little while now.  Calling you "Mrs. Red" seems so formal.  Any chance of getting a first name??  ;)


It's Scarlett, dahling!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on June 30, 2006, 07:29:20 PM
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "oldfart"
You are good at words so ....how about posting a question in Art Woods thread on this subject? http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=10
(I'v already sent the address to Dana)


Good wityh words?  Me??  Although that's nice of you to say, I don't really think I am.  But, I'd have no problem posing a question to Mr. Woods...

What exactly would you like me to ask him?


Hey OLDFART ! I heard you on the Dana show before. you sounded great ! !


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on June 30, 2006, 07:30:25 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Justins I know htat Julia has a husband, but I don't know anything else about him....


Cept that he has the deepest sympathy of everybody on this board!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on June 30, 2006, 07:30:48 PM
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Sorry I was watching Judy Teunda and got all caught up in it... she makes me laugh...


Haven't heard her name in a LONG time Mrs. Red!  Hey...we've now known each other for a little while now.  Calling you "Mrs. Red" seems so formal.  Any chance of getting a first name??  ;)


scarlett sounds about right???


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: justinsmama on June 30, 2006, 07:30:53 PM
OF~ So sorry that you had a head banging day.  :cry:  Not payday for me but a GREAT Friday! Got the key to my new abode today! Whoohoo! Gotta clean and then can move right in!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on June 30, 2006, 07:32:03 PM
Congrats Justins....

Third, ya  know I love ya baby!!  

I am this time really going... save my place... BBL!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on June 30, 2006, 07:32:50 PM
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"
Buncha Boring Monkeys! 8)


First you love me, now I'm boring?  Just like a woman...;)


I still Love ya but I am glad that you won't be Amish cause they will not let you wear your purple pants!


That's right!!  I like your way of thinking Mermaid!  Besides the obvious reasons for not wanting to be Amish, I'm ashamed to say...I'm also afraid of horses...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on June 30, 2006, 07:34:22 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Sorry I was watching Judy Teunda and got all caught up in it... she makes me laugh...


Haven't heard her name in a LONG time Mrs. Red!  Hey...we've now known each other for a little while now.  Calling you "Mrs. Red" seems so formal.  Any chance of getting a first name??  ;)


scarlett sounds about right???


Scarlett it is then, Mrs. Red!  ;)  See you later.  Tell Mr. Red I said "whazzuupp" as well!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: justinsmama on June 30, 2006, 07:34:50 PM
Y'all know my little site for Natalee? Well, you would not believe the propositions that I've gotten in my inbox there... Even with the statement that my primary interest is what it is.  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on June 30, 2006, 07:35:02 PM
Quote from: "justinsmama"
OF~ So sorry that you had a head banging day.  :cry:  Not payday for me but a GREAT Friday! Got the key to my new abode today! Whoohoo! Gotta clean and then can move right in!


Old tradition states that the first four things that you bring to a new place are:

Salt - the spice of life
Sugar - The sweet
Loaf of bread - the Staff of Life
A Broom - To sweep away the devil!

Much happiness to you in your new home!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on June 30, 2006, 07:35:08 PM
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"
Quote from: "justinsmama"
To: AZLady, klaasend, lexie, mrs. red, ospainter, SunFreak2, thirdstrike-

This Thread Will Lock On Page 50!!!


Not even Justins can see me good thing there is no iggy button otherwise I would think I was iggy!


Hi Mermaid.  Thanks for the recipe.  Hybiscus bushes are pretty hardy in your neck of the woods.   When we were kids we would pull out the fuzzy part of the flowers and stick 'em in backwards.  I have no idea why, but we did.   :lol:  :lol:   We always had poinsettias and gardenias too.  And of course cactus.  I remember falling in the cactus many times and having to have the needles pulled out.  Yipes.   :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Jerry from Ohio on June 30, 2006, 07:35:28 PM
Ohhh  !!  Now  we see who wields the power around here  hehehe  OLD FART asks Klauss to fix his post  and whooosh ! three posts later it 's fixed  
  Darn OlD  whats your secret  HUH ??  
  " ya do both know im kidden ya don't ya ? "
   :lol:  So the Old Fart  come's thru in the clutches  LOL  
  I know Im gonna start being a whole lot  nicer to the Klauss lady  heehe  Turning on  the ol Cowboy  charm <g>  even as we speak <G>  
   Jerry from Ohio  :D




Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "oldfart"
Klaasend
You think you are confused...
my last post said Mr. Wards thread  could you please change that to
Mr. Woods thread :oops:  :roll:
So Many players and no program card to follow and I get  :?
TIA


Fixed  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on June 30, 2006, 07:37:09 PM
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Justins I know htat Julia has a husband, but I don't know anything else about him....


Cept that he has the deepest sympathy of everybody on this board!


(http://bestsmileys.com/lol/1.gif)
(http://bestsmileys.com/lol/1.gif)
(http://bestsmileys.com/lol/1.gif)
(http://bestsmileys.com/lol/1.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on June 30, 2006, 07:37:25 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "klaasend"
There is nothing indicating that this Columbian witness is a gardener of any kind.  It's been mentioned on other sites that he may be a construction worker.  

The original gardener witness has been accused of working for Jossy and JR.


 I thought we were talking about the original gardner.... I am confused...

In Dave Holloway's book, Art Wood is the one who provided the info to Dave that Eric Mansur employed the gardener who saw the car by the Raquest Club. Eric advised Art that the police had been aware of this witness since early June. Eric's Sister-I-L was Jan Van Der Strattens
secretary. Even tho they knew of this, the police had not interviewed him by the end of July.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: justinsmama on June 30, 2006, 07:37:52 PM
Oh, third, I'm askeered of them too! Never had one even act as if it were going harm me or anyone else, but have always quaked in me boots when near any! I've ridden, but it has NOT been pleasant. They are very big, powerful beasties!  :shock:

A cardiologist died and was given an elaborate  funeral. A huge heart covered in flowers stood behind the casket during the service.  Following the eulogy, the heart opened, and the casket  rolled inside. The heart then closed, sealing the doctor in the beautiful heart forever.

     At that point, one of the mourners burst into laughter. When all eyes stared at him, he said, "I'm sorry, I was just thinking of my own funeral.  I'm a gynecologist."

    The proctologist fainted.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: justinsmama on June 30, 2006, 07:40:05 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Justins I know htat Julia has a husband, but I don't know anything else about him....


Cept that he has the deepest sympathy of everybody on this board!


(http://bestsmileys.com/lol/1.gif)
(http://bestsmileys.com/lol/1.gif)
(http://bestsmileys.com/lol/1.gif)
(http://bestsmileys.com/lol/1.gif)


Ditto!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: justinsmama on June 30, 2006, 07:42:23 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "klaasend"
There is nothing indicating that this Columbian witness is a gardener of any kind.  It's been mentioned on other sites that he may be a construction worker.  

The original gardener witness has been accused of working for Jossy and JR.


 I thought we were talking about the original gardner.... I am confused...

In Dave Holloway's book, Art Wood is the one who provided the info to Dave that Eric Mansur employed the gardener who saw the car by the Raquest Club. Eric advised Art that the police had been aware of this witness since early June. Eric's Sister-I-L was Jan Van Der Strattens
secretary. Even tho they knew of this, the police had not interviewed him by the end of July.


Perhaps he was employed by more than one household.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: terryd270 on June 30, 2006, 07:47:10 PM
Well I think my time with my girlfriend is coming to an end..  Too many fights lately and I have no idea what they are about.. Have you ever had the experience where you are at a party, or some other social gathering, and you feel as though you are completely incapable of being socially adept enough to carry on a personable conversation, so you plant yourself in the middle of some talkative people and stand there, pretending to be a part of the conversation, but inside you know that you are not? Sometimes, I think that pretending is enough. pretending makes it real. or, perhaps, always. Tomorrow, I start pretending that everything is okay, and, maybe they will appear that way.  So whats happening on the case and I went to and read up on medley and it was interesting, umm reap what you sow..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: terryd270 on June 30, 2006, 07:50:05 PM
The guy that cuts my lawn cuts a lot of lawns in this neighborhood and the one I lived before..  So if he is good he might have a lot of yards that he maintains.. So I thought I heard that they had the same yard person and I don't find that too hard to believe..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on June 30, 2006, 07:50:08 PM
Quote from: "Jerry from Ohio"

heehe  Turning on  the ol Cowboy  charm <g>  


I remember having a t-shirt that said:

"Cowboys stay in the saddle just a little bit longer."

David Allen Coe:
"Divers do it deeper
Jockeys do it shorter
Bricklayers always make it just a little bit stronger
Sailors do it wetter
Soldiers do it better
But cowboys stay in the saddle
Just a little bit longer"


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on June 30, 2006, 07:52:41 PM
Quote from: "justinsmama"
Oh, third, I'm askeered of them too! Never had one even act as if it were going harm me or anyone else, but have always quaked in me boots when near any! I've ridden, but it has NOT been pleasant. They are very big, powerful beasties!  :shock:


I actually have a reason to be scared of them justins!  As a youngster, I had a job earning spending money cleaning horse stables.  One day, I was scoopin up some...well...horse waste, and one of them leaned over and bit me in the webbing between my thumb and index finegr.  Tore some skin off, and scared the poop out of me from that point forward...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on June 30, 2006, 07:55:44 PM
Quote from: "terryd270"
Well I think my time with my girlfriend is coming to an end..  Too many fights lately and I have no idea what they are about.. Have you ever had the experience where you are at a party, or some other social gathering, and you feel as though you are completely incapable of being socially adept enough to carry on a personable conversation, so you plant yourself in the middle of some talkative people and stand there, pretending to be a part of the conversation, but inside you know that you are not? Sometimes, I think that pretending is enough. pretending makes it real. or, perhaps, always. Tomorrow, I start pretending that everything is okay, and, maybe they will appear that way.  So whats happening on the case and I went to and read up on medley and it was interesting, umm reap what you sow..


Sounds to me like her friends are the type of people you don't enjoy being around.  Life is too short to spend it fighting with someone, it's just not worth it.   :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: justinsmama on June 30, 2006, 07:55:59 PM
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "justinsmama"
Oh, third, I'm askeered of them too! Never had one even act as if it were going harm me or anyone else, but have always quaked in me boots when near any! I've ridden, but it has NOT been pleasant. They are very big, powerful beasties!  :shock:


I actually have a reason to be scared of them justins!  As a youngster, I had a job earning spending money cleaning horse stables.  One day, I was scoopin up some...well...horse waste, and one of them leaned over and bit me in the webbing between my thumb and index finegr.  Tore some skin off, and scared the poop out of me from that point forward...


Yikes! While I did not witness it, when we were 14 years old, a friend of mine was bitten by a horse on her, uh, how shall I say it? her kaboobie! Horrors!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Peaches on June 30, 2006, 07:56:26 PM
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"
but hey here it is again if anybody doesn't want to go to the lounge. :roll:


Thanks, Mermaid.  Got it!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: justinsmama on June 30, 2006, 07:57:12 PM
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
Quote from: "Jerry from Ohio"

heehe  Turning on  the ol Cowboy  charm <g>  


I remember having a t-shirt that said:

"Cowboys stay in the saddle just a little bit longer."

David Allen Coe:
"Divers do it deeper
Jockeys do it shorter
Bricklayers always make it just a little bit stronger
Sailors do it wetter
Soldiers do it better
But cowboys stay in the saddle
Just a little bit longer"


What do school administrator's do more of?  :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on June 30, 2006, 07:57:45 PM
Quote from: "terryd270"
The guy that cuts my lawn cuts a lot of lawns in this neighborhood and the one I lived before..  So if he is good he might have a lot of yards that he maintains.. So I thought I heard that they had the same yard person and I don't find that too hard to believe..


Good point Terry - so to put it in perspective what they call a Gardener is really a lawn /yard man.

Plus alot of the houses I saw didn't have enough landscaping to warrant a full time Gardener.

If he was JR's gardener I always pictured him watering her Marajuana plants - he teeth didn't get that way by accident!

Boy oh boy I am an :twisted: mermaid tonight!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on June 30, 2006, 07:57:51 PM
OK, finally out of here for ther evening (work)...and on to my extended 4-day weekend!!  I'll be back later on.  But, to all those I don't see...

Have a GREAT weekend, and a safe and happy 4th of July!!

Be good!

Strike


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: justinsmama on June 30, 2006, 07:58:15 PM
Ah, Terry, I'm sorry!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Peaches on June 30, 2006, 08:00:33 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "terryd270"
Well I think my time with my girlfriend is coming to an end..  Too many fights lately and I have no idea what they are about.. Have you ever had the experience where you are at a party, or some other social gathering, and you feel as though you are completely incapable of being socially adept enough to carry on a personable conversation, so you plant yourself in the middle of some talkative people and stand there, pretending to be a part of the conversation, but inside you know that you are not? Sometimes, I think that pretending is enough. pretending makes it real. or, perhaps, always. Tomorrow, I start pretending that everything is okay, and, maybe they will appear that way.  So whats happening on the case and I went to and read up on medley and it was interesting, umm reap what you sow..


Sounds to me like her friends are the type of people you don't enjoy being around.  Life is too short to spend it fighting with someone, it's just not worth it.   :wink:


Lotsa fish in the sea.  Especially if you're a peeping squirrel.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: terryd270 on June 30, 2006, 08:00:53 PM
Klaasend,

I was supposed to goto a birthday party for someone tonight and I canceled out.. I told them that a meteor the size of Manhattan was heading towards Earth and I had to get ready.. Well now I'm home by myself.. Actually a lot of it has to do with this case and how I feel vs how she feels.. We don't talk about it but when we do, I see something I really don't like and just want to go home..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on June 30, 2006, 08:02:27 PM
her kaboobie!

 :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Peaches on June 30, 2006, 08:02:39 PM
Klaas, can you possibly repost the update from None re her DH? I want my DH to read it and you know I suck at finding stuff.

Besides, there are different monkeys in the cage who may not have seen it.  TY
You rock.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: terryd270 on June 30, 2006, 08:05:51 PM
It can be difficult to remember that 'everyone else' is not the same person. I have to believe that somewhere in Karma-space there is a ledger of items given and stolen, earned and cheated. It is a comforting chimera that prevents me from imploding. I do not mean this in a Judgment-Day-Gates-of-Heaven way, but rather, in a sense that is wholly pragmatic: memories are not always conscious, but they probably do not go away. Thus, there may well be certain file directories in the individual consciousness that store all the Bad Things that said person has done. I guess thats Joran and the Kalpoe's have convinced themselves that they did not rape and kill someone. This seems to be a conflict with the common tendency of humans to think of ourselves as "good people."
When we cannot change what we did, we can change our memories. For reasons that might be even evolutionary in origin (after all, the species would die quickly if we killed ourselves off) no persons seem easier to defraud than ourselves.  JORAN AND THE KALPOES ARE KILLERS..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on June 30, 2006, 08:07:36 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Hi Everyone-

Klaas you win our bet, I had to post today but I think you'll smile over this one.

This is very important for me today, and so close to my heart, so I post this with great gratitude and hope. So many of you have made this journey so much easier for us, and helped to sustain our spirits.

My hubby hit rock bottom last weekend, I feared he might not make it. Today he completed his 50th radiation treatment in 32 days, and he's still standing, even better he appears to be rebounding strongly. This is the FIRST time since this saga began that we have had any good news, any at all. His hemoglobin is great, his BP and his red and white cell counts very good, and he GAINED one pound!!  :D  :D  :D

He has a ways to go but his oncologist told him he is "remarkable" and "surprising everyone". I have repeated those words about 50 times since noon today, I can't say them out loud enough.

So yes there is power in prayer, he is living proof and some of you have prayed so hard I know you were neglecting other things in your day to do so. I can never thank you enough, never.

Please keep us in your prayers, today I truly can say that word miracle with a stronger voice than I could before. Thank you so much for that.

Please pray hard for Peaches too for she's been great support for us, even when I knew even hearing our negative news could be difficult for her.

All of you are in our prayers and we pray for each and every hurt or afflicted or challenged monkey or family member here, or in your hearts. We pray for Natalee and her family, for they made this community come together, and deserve great peace and justice in their lives.

It is wonderful to keep the faith and then to be blessed with reward from that. It is a joyful day.


Here's the great news Nonesuche posted earlier today.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on June 30, 2006, 08:12:30 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Hi Everyone-

Klaas you win our bet, I had to post today but I think you'll smile over this one.

This is very important for me today, and so close to my heart, so I post this with great gratitude and hope. So many of you have made this journey so much easier for us, and helped to sustain our spirits.

My hubby hit rock bottom last weekend, I feared he might not make it. Today he completed his 50th radiation treatment in 32 days, and he's still standing, even better he appears to be rebounding strongly. This is the FIRST time since this saga began that we have had any good news, any at all. His hemoglobin is great, his BP and his red and white cell counts very good, and he GAINED one pound!!  :D  :D  :D

He has a ways to go but his oncologist told him he is "remarkable" and "surprising everyone". I have repeated those words about 50 times since noon today, I can't say them out loud enough.

So yes there is power in prayer, he is living proof and some of you have prayed so hard I know you were neglecting other things in your day to do so. I can never thank you enough, never.

Please keep us in your prayers, today I truly can say that word miracle with a stronger voice than I could before. Thank you so much for that.

Please pray hard for Peaches too for she's been great support for us, even when I knew even hearing our negative news could be difficult for her.

All of you are in our prayers and we pray for each and every hurt or afflicted or challenged monkey or family member here, or in your hearts. We pray for Natalee and her family, for they made this community come together, and deserve great peace and justice in their lives.

It is wonderful to keep the faith and then to be blessed with reward from that. It is a joyful day.


Prayer is the way to miracles, many, many miracles.  Peaches's family and yours are always in my thoughts and prayers.  Two pretty remarkable people.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on June 30, 2006, 08:13:56 PM
Quote from: "terryd270"
Klaasend,

I was supposed to goto a birthday party for someone tonight and I canceled out.. I told them that a meteor the size of Manhattan was heading towards Earth and I had to get ready.. Well now I'm home by myself.. Actually a lot of it has to do with this case and how I feel vs how she feels.. We don't talk about it but when we do, I see something I really don't like and just want to go home..


Terry - I understand what you are saying but if the only problem was how she feels about this case you would be going to the party and not sitting home.  It's got to be more than this case, IMO.  Besides, sometimes sitting home by yourself is a good thing!  Not to mention, you have all of us to keep you company  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on June 30, 2006, 08:16:03 PM
I am so haappy for None - she has been a rock!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: justinsmama on June 30, 2006, 08:18:36 PM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "terryd270"
Well I think my time with my girlfriend is coming to an end..  Too many fights lately and I have no idea what they are about.. Have you ever had the experience where you are at a party, or some other social gathering, and you feel as though you are completely incapable of being socially adept enough to carry on a personable conversation, so you plant yourself in the middle of some talkative people and stand there, pretending to be a part of the conversation, but inside you know that you are not? Sometimes, I think that pretending is enough. pretending makes it real. or, perhaps, always. Tomorrow, I start pretending that everything is okay, and, maybe they will appear that way.  So whats happening on the case and I went to and read up on medley and it was interesting, umm reap what you sow..


Sounds to me like her friends are the type of people you don't enjoy being around.  Life is too short to spend it fighting with someone, it's just not worth it.   :wink:


Lotsa fish in the sea.  Especially if you're a peeping squirrel.


I've always thought squirrels were adorable!

I am so happy to learn of None's very good news! We gotsta keep up those prayers! They work!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: terryd270 on June 30, 2006, 08:20:45 PM
Philosophical Klaasend,

Your right and I was reminded of certain philosophies I learned to follow in high school. I was told, if you smile at people when you walk down the halls, you will find that more and more people will begin to smile back at you. I learned that, often, if you treat people as if they think of you the way you wished they would think of you, they then begin to think of you that way. I was reminded that it is useless and counterproductive to attempt to win the respect of people whom you do not respect.  rather, there is no greater thrill and accomplishment than gaining the respect of those whom you yourself respect. sometimes I think I learned more in high school than i have in all of the years since then. now, if only I could do as I say, not as I do ...

I have some Nickleback playing "Animals"..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: terryd270 on June 30, 2006, 08:23:17 PM
Tell that BTGirl and Angie to get back here..  I guess I will have to hide that BTGirls husbands toothbrush..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on June 30, 2006, 08:24:16 PM
Quote from: "terryd270"
Philosophical Klaasend,

Your right and I was reminded of certain philosophies I learned to follow in high school. I was told, if you smile at people when you walk down the halls, you will find that more and more people will begin to smile back at you. I learned that, often, if you treat people as if they think of you the way you wished they would think of you, they then begin to think of you that way. I was reminded that it is useless and counterproductive to attempt to win the respect of people whom you do not respect.  rather, there is no greater thrill and accomplishment than gaining the respect of those whom you yourself respect. sometimes I think I learned more in high school than i have in all of the years since then. now, if only I could do as I say, not as I do ...

I have some Nickleback playing "Animals"..


Well said and very true.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on June 30, 2006, 08:25:59 PM
Quote from: "terryd270"
Tell that BTGirl and Angie to get back here..  I guess I will have to hide that BTGirls husbands toothbrush..


 :lol:  :lol: (http://www.gifworks.com/queue/tooth_fairy_carrying_toothbrush_md_clr_30280.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Peaches on June 30, 2006, 08:27:46 PM
Thank you, Klaas.  I wanted to update Mr. Peaches on None's DH's status and it made more sense for him to read her post than for me to try to recap it.  Sometimes I have CRS.

You are multi-talented.  

Thanks for your prayers, TG and everyone else.

I just made Bean's Runza casserole recipe.  I can hardly wait!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on June 30, 2006, 08:29:38 PM
I want some Runza Casserole Please. :o


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on June 30, 2006, 08:32:01 PM
Quote from: "terryd270"
Philosophical Klaasend,

Your right and I was reminded of certain philosophies I learned to follow in high school. I was told, if you smile at people when you walk down the halls, you will find that more and more people will begin to smile back at you. I learned that, often, if you treat people as if they think of you the way you wished they would think of you, they then begin to think of you that way. I was reminded that it is useless and counterproductive to attempt to win the respect of people whom you do not respect.  rather, there is no greater thrill and accomplishment than gaining the respect of those whom you yourself respect. sometimes I think I learned more in high school than i have in all of the years since then. now, if only I could do as I say, not as I do ...

I have some Nickleback playing "Animals"..


You definitely went to a different High School than me.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Jerry from Ohio on June 30, 2006, 08:33:39 PM
To Justins mama I took a look at your site and it's just wonderful and the pic of the lovely  Lady who owns it  isn't  bad at all both are very sweet and also lovely  <g>  Spoken from the heart of an ol Broken up Cowboy  :)
  and  Now  who is it thats afraid of Horses ?
  I have a Halflinger Mare named "Bell" that would just love to give you a nice slow ride  she  is the best with kids and scared adults  she  just plods along and she will take care of you all along the way .
 Shes a real People Horse <g> and best thing is she works for just apple tips  hehehe
   Jerry from Ohio  :lol:    





Quote from: "justinsmama"
Y'all know my little site for Natalee? Well, you would not believe the propositions that I've gotten in my inbox there... Even with the statement that my primary interest is what it is.  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: terryd270 on June 30, 2006, 08:33:47 PM
I was in the Airforce and was put on CQ duty and was told to escort a prisoner to the doctors office.. Well this prisoner was the biggest American Indian that I had ever seen and he was in jail for like getting into a fight and breaking like 3 or 4 peoples arms and stuff.. Well I report like ordered and they bring this 7' 400 lb guy out and tell me to take him to the doctors office.. I was in training for ATC and not a guard or anything, so I had no gun.. Well he started walking and I just followed like 10' behind and let him go where he wanted to go.. He finally saw me way back there and asked me why I was walking so far back and I just asked if he was a giant and was his whole family giants.. He started laughing and we actually became friends for that day.. I told him if he started to run, I was just making sure I could run the other way..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on June 30, 2006, 08:34:24 PM
What's this?  Angie will not play with the monkeys anymore. :?:

I hope she knows she will spontaneously combust! :shock:

What the heck goes on here when I am not around? :cry:

Somebody or bodies are driving them off in droves. :evil:

We need to stick together if we are going to solve this! :!:

 :idea: Peace! 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: terryd270 on June 30, 2006, 08:35:47 PM
Yikes is that FlyingMermaid.. I better hide.. :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on June 30, 2006, 08:36:17 PM
Quote from: "terryd270"
I was in the Airforce and was put on CQ duty and was told to escort a prisoner to the doctors office.. Well this prisoner was the biggest American Indian that I had ever seen and he was in jail for like getting into a fight and breaking like 3 or 4 peoples arms and stuff.. Well I report like ordered and they bring this 7' 400 lb guy out and tell me to take him to the doctors office.. I was in training for ATC and not a guard or anything, so I had no gun.. Well he started walking and I just followed like 10' behind and let him go where he wanted to go.. He finally saw me way back there and asked me why I was walking so far back and I just asked if he was a giant and was his whole family giants.. He started laughing and we actually became friends for that day.. I told him if he started to run, I was just making sure I could run the other way..


Too funny Terry!  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on June 30, 2006, 08:37:27 PM
Quote from: "terryd270"
Yikes is that FlyingMermaid.. I better hide.. :D


Y?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Jerry from Ohio on June 30, 2006, 08:40:19 PM
Klauss I do hope that you realize that you do totally amaze me with all your little art work stuff don't you ?  you are an amazeing lady  woman <g>  
  ((((((((Klauss ))))))
  Jerry from Ohio




Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "terryd270"
Tell that BTGirl and Angie to get back here..  I guess I will have to hide that BTGirls husbands toothbrush..


 :lol:  :lol: (http://www.gifworks.com/queue/tooth_fairy_carrying_toothbrush_md_clr_30280.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on June 30, 2006, 08:40:57 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
More posted on the front page by GRANDE;

LOOK UP PEDRO MARTIN UNDER REGISTERED AGENTS IN THE FLORIDA DIVISION OF CORPORATIONS SEARCH AND SEE WHAT YOU FIND!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

ALSO LOOK UP ARUBA ALOE OF AMERICA AS WELL AND COMPARE THE ADDRESSES!!!!!!!!!!

Perdro is the listed officer for > PLAINVIEW FLORIDA NV!!!!!!!!!!

YOU MIGHT ALSO BE INTERESTED IN THE DADE COUNTY RECORDS ON PEDRO !

I AM ABSOLUTELY SHOCKED !!!!!!!!!!!!!

*********************************************
PLAINVIEW INC. = BRICKELL AVENUE, MIAMI FLORIDA

PRINCIPAL BUSINESS ADDRESS FOR ARUBA ALOE OF AMERICA =

701 BRICKELL AVENUE SUITE xxxx

PRINCIPAL BUSINESS ADDRESS FOR PLAINVIEW INC. =

701 BRICKELL AVENUE SUITE XXXX

WHERE WAS THAT PAULUS WENT IN MIAMI ??????????????



Rut Roh.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on June 30, 2006, 08:41:59 PM
Several people have thought they see a body in the aru-bay video with the white bag.  I have a hard time believing it.  You can over adjust and enhance a photo too much, IMO.  This was posted by Spock at BFN.  I find this far more likely, that there is clothing or evidence in the bag:

The small image in the middle is of Natalee's actual top:

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/blousecompare.png)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: terryd270 on June 30, 2006, 08:42:38 PM
klaasend,

This was after hearing in headquarters about why this guy was in jail.. I was thinking I hope they give me something to control this guy but nope just told me to sign him out and off we went..  I wasn't even sure he could talk, they just said go and get the indian, his escort is here..  I think he might be the biggest person I have ever seen in my life..   I think my commander was mad at me and was just having some fun because I wan't in security, I was in Air Traffic Control in the Air Force..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on June 30, 2006, 08:42:51 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "klaasend"
More posted on the front page by GRANDE;

LOOK UP PEDRO MARTIN UNDER REGISTERED AGENTS IN THE FLORIDA DIVISION OF CORPORATIONS SEARCH AND SEE WHAT YOU FIND!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

ALSO LOOK UP ARUBA ALOE OF AMERICA AS WELL AND COMPARE THE ADDRESSES!!!!!!!!!!

Perdro is the listed officer for > PLAINVIEW FLORIDA NV!!!!!!!!!!

YOU MIGHT ALSO BE INTERESTED IN THE DADE COUNTY RECORDS ON PEDRO !

I AM ABSOLUTELY SHOCKED !!!!!!!!!!!!!

*********************************************
PLAINVIEW INC. = BRICKELL AVENUE, MIAMI FLORIDA

PRINCIPAL BUSINESS ADDRESS FOR ARUBA ALOE OF AMERICA =

701 BRICKELL AVENUE SUITE xxxx

PRINCIPAL BUSINESS ADDRESS FOR PLAINVIEW INC. =

701 BRICKELL AVENUE SUITE XXXX

WHERE WAS THAT PAULUS WENT IN MIAMI ??????????????



Rut Roh.


Anyone want to clue me in on what this is supposed to mean?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on June 30, 2006, 08:42:57 PM
Quote from: "WidgetTheMidget"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Widget - there has been discussion, I don't remember if it was Shango/Simian or someone else.  Something like look to the center of the island.  Aloe has been mentioned before in the Code Talkers thread I believe.


Is'nt Posner An Owner Of An Aloe Company ....................

 8)


That's what I understand.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on June 30, 2006, 08:43:07 PM
Thanks Jerry - took me a year in this forum to bookmark all the links and figure out all the tricks  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: terryd270 on June 30, 2006, 08:44:41 PM
FlyingMermaid,

You know I was kidding with you..  How are you this Friday Night?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Peaches on June 30, 2006, 08:46:29 PM
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"
I want some Runza Casserole Please. :o


The recipe is in the Lounge for your convenience.  Bake it about 30 min.  I also put swiss cheese on top of the meat/cabbage and then put the rolled out rolls on top of that.  It's yummy stuff.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Peaches on June 30, 2006, 08:52:03 PM
I see everyone is waiting for the cage to change.  So just post short stuff!  We'll get there!


Title: Happy Independence Day!
Post by: KatzHome on June 30, 2006, 08:52:33 PM
(http://i27.photobucket.com/albums/c186/MarysKid/4th_of_July.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: terryd270 on June 30, 2006, 08:52:52 PM
If you could read my mind what a tale my thoughts would tell.. :D  :D  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on June 30, 2006, 08:53:19 PM
Castor Beans and Natalee’s Case
Dale Netherton
June 29, 2006

Recently there was a television program about a doctor who was poisoned by his wife using castor beans, which contain the poison ricin. The story revealed the doctor had returned from the tropics and was suspected of contracting some disease from his visit. He was placed in the hospital and several tests were run, but there was no definitive diagnosis. As he improved in the hospital he returned home and soon became violently ill with the same symptoms he had experienced previously. The doctors working on the case assumed he was allergic to wheat gluten and prescribed a strict diet to exclude wheat from his diet. Again he returned to the hospital in pain and finding he had tried to test their hypothesis concluded the allergy theory was the most probable cause of his illness.

Watching this program I saw a lot of similarities with the assumptions the doctors were using and the ones the investigators in the Natalee Holloway case maintained. The doctors ( including the doctor patient ) refused to believe the doctor’s wife could have anything to do with the illness. Although they knew it was very unusual for an allergy to begin so suddenly and they knew their theory of an allergy to wheat gluten could be easily tested ( but wasn’t ), they persisted in pursuing the search for an unknown bacillus or virus. They even diagnosed the problem once as Typhoid Fever but had to finally discard this diagnosis as inconsistent with his return to the hospital after treatment.

The doctor then got suspicious of his wife ( who he was in the process of divorcing ) and looking in one of her dresser drawers found a couple of packets of castor beans. When he was tested for ricin and found his blood contained some of the poison the mystery was solved. But the assumption of the wife’s innocence prevented it from being solved sooner. Once that assumption was questioned- the solution was easily determined for it was possible then to formulate a probable cause that explained why he was sick at home and not at the hospital, Why the symptoms had an rapid onset, why the misdiagnosed typhoid fever symptoms returned and finally why nothing they had theorized previously explained the mystery.

Like the doctor’s case, false assumptions are leading nowhere in the Natalee Holloway disappearance. The doctor and the other physicians on the case didn’t want to consider the wife may have been involved. Consequently they came up with theories that left gaps in their formulation of a most probable cause. Not everything could be made to fit under the false assumptions they used. Likewise not everything can be made to fit in the Natalee Holloway case using the assumptions that have so far been promoted. It doesn’t fit that teen age boys could kill a girl and not leave a trace of evidence. It doesn’t fit that a girl could disappear on a small island under her own power. It doesn’t fit that many “suspects” have been “arrested” and released. Unless you assume there might be some form of collusion by some authorities.

This assumption ( like the doctor’s presumed innocence of his wife ) prevents any investigation into those supposedly doing their best to find Natalee. When the doctor confronted his wife she cracked under the overwhelming evidence she had to admit and couldn’t explain. What do you suppose would happen if the investigation into Natalee’s disappearance raised similar concerns about the unexplained arrests and releases, the bizarre theories that contradicted known facts( like the “passed out” theory based on no known evidence )? What would be the response to an internal investigation similar to appointing a special prosecutor independent of Aruban interests?

Think about how many times you have assumed something to be wrong and found that your assumption prevented you from finding the solution to the problem. How many of us have called the TV repairman only to find we had assumed the plug was in the outlet? Or we assumed our gas gauge was correct and ran out of gas. Or we assumed we had turned off all the lights and find we had left one on? False assumptions keep us from finding the truth. They limit our investigation and create barriers to inquiry that may very well lead us to the solution we seek.

The number one cause of mistaken solutions to problems according the problem solving guru’s , Kepner Tregoe, is ‘ jumping to cause’. This is another way of saying, “Don’t assume you know what caused the disappearance of Natalee”.

By the same token when no results have been discovered with the methods you have utilized, it is time to review what you have not yet investigated and see if you cannot formulate a theory that includes this new approach. Otherwise you are left with resignation and failure.

http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/viewArticle.asp?articleID=11029


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Peaches on June 30, 2006, 08:53:38 PM
Quote from: "terryd270"
If you could read my mind what a tale my thoughts would tell.. :D  :D  :D


No doubt!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on June 30, 2006, 08:56:17 PM
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"
Just took a walk outside and I am amazed at how my Hybiscus, Hedge and Areca palms have come back thriving after the hurricane last year.  I remember thinking after the storm that we would have to landscape everything over again.

Mother nature is an amazing woman!


Absolutely.  We had three tornadoes with hail a few years ago in a few months' time, which meant three roofs, and I thought all my garden was lost.  It came back better than ever.  It must have liked the roofing tacks or the rowdy weather.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: MominTN on June 30, 2006, 08:56:26 PM
Sorry Dale, we know who killed Natalee and we know Aruba is covering it up.  We've been round and round, and there's no place left to go.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: terryd270 on June 30, 2006, 08:56:44 PM
"the trouble with being in the rat race is that even if you win, you're still a rat." lily thomlin


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Peaches on June 30, 2006, 08:59:26 PM
Well, that runza casserole was great.  Everyone at my house loves it.  My daughter just asked if I was ever going to make it again.  Well, DUH!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on June 30, 2006, 08:59:43 PM
Quote from: "MominTN"
Sorry Dale, we know who killed Natalee and we know Aruba is covering it up.  We've been round and round, and there's no place left to go.


I'm reading his article completely different than you are.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on June 30, 2006, 08:59:55 PM
Quote from: "MominTN"
Sorry Dale, we know who killed Natalee and we know Aruba is covering it up.  We've been round and round, and there's no place left to go.

You are so right.
 8) Now the cover up is to cover up the cover up.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Peaches on June 30, 2006, 09:01:21 PM
Good article, Klaas.  Thanks.  Very insightful.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: terryd270 on June 30, 2006, 09:01:24 PM
TylerGal,

I was on a ride and I stopped in back of Publix's and in the corner to the right, on a small patch of earth that weeds have not swallowed, next to the row of garbage cans, where it smells pretty bad, is a small plant brimming with bright red hot peppers. There must be about twenty peppers there. And next to it in the dirt is an old cigarette butt.  So your right that sometimes nature has a way of coming through..


Title: Re: Happy Independence Day!
Post by: Kat_Gram on June 30, 2006, 09:02:38 PM
Quote from: "KatzHome"
(http://i27.photobucket.com/albums/c186/MarysKid/4th_of_July.gif)

And we nice, meek mild Canuks say !
.
happy
canada
day
.
Bonne Fete


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Peaches on June 30, 2006, 09:03:12 PM
Quote from: "terryd270"
TylerGal,

I was on a ride and I stopped in back of Publix's and in the corner to the right, on a small patch of earth that weeds have not swallowed, next to the row of garbage cans, where it smells pretty bad, is a small plant brimming with bright red hot peppers. There must be about twenty peppers there. And next to it in the dirt is an old cigarette butt.  So your right that sometimes nature has a way of coming through..


So did you pick some to take home?  You have to love volunteers!  I have volunteer crepe myrtles in several places where I didn't intend them to be. I just don't have the heart to dig them up!  I'd rather just integrate them into the plan.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: MominTN on June 30, 2006, 09:03:17 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "MominTN"
Sorry Dale, we know who killed Natalee and we know Aruba is covering it up.  We've been round and round, and there's no place left to go.


I'm reading his article completely different than you are.


So what is it saying to you?  Confront Aruba with the falsehoods and make them explain it?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on June 30, 2006, 09:03:21 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Several people have thought they see a body in the aru-bay video with the white bag.  I have a hard time believing it.  You can over adjust and enhance a photo too much, IMO.  This was posted by Spock at BFN.  I find this far more likely, that there is clothing or evidence in the bag:

The small image in the middle is of Natalee's actual top:

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/blousecompare.png)


Mearly an attempt to get to page 50.  Dinner is ready  :wink:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Peaches on June 30, 2006, 09:04:22 PM
I could never see anything but a bag in those pictures.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on June 30, 2006, 09:04:35 PM
Quote from: "MominTN"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "MominTN"
Sorry Dale, we know who killed Natalee and we know Aruba is covering it up.  We've been round and round, and there's no place left to go.


I'm reading his article completely different than you are.


So what is it saying to you?  Confront Aruba with the falsehoods and make them explain it?


Somewhat.  He's saying people are assuming that 17yr old kids could not have pulled off the perfect crime.  That we should be careful of assumptions.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: Peaches on June 30, 2006, 09:04:58 PM
I bet this page is going to lock on 50.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #483 6/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on June 30, 2006, 09:05:38 PM
(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/nowlocked.jpg)

Please move to LCD# 484

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=27