Scared Monkeys Discussion Forum

Natalee Holloway => LCD Archive => Topic started by: San on November 30, 2007, 04:05:13 PM



Title: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: San on November 30, 2007, 04:05:13 PM
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/NH.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: robots on November 30, 2007, 04:13:39 PM
:)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on November 30, 2007, 04:14:00 PM
Greta did not know if Dave was oon the same flight with Beth.  I wonder what time they are supposed to meet with Mos?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Canary on November 30, 2007, 04:14:07 PM
Joran's motion dismissed means I think only that the judge made the decision and the decision was no TV, no parents and visitors, only old magazines and books and some exercise - that's what I got out of RU - but I could be wrong


But Joran did not get a really good ruling - so that is a very good sign I think....I hope


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on November 30, 2007, 04:15:10 PM
:)

 you stinker,., you're always first !  :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Port Valerie on November 30, 2007, 04:15:42 PM
I hope someone carries the press conference.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on November 30, 2007, 04:16:05 PM
Joran's motion dismissed means I think only that the judge made the decision and the decision was no TV, no parents and visitors, only old magazines and books and some exercise - that's what I got out of RU - but I could be wrong


But Joran did not get a really good ruling - so that is a very good sign I think....I hope

 I certainly hope so as well !


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: chelebele on November 30, 2007, 04:17:29 PM
I hope someone carries the press conference.



me too...I'm getting sick of looking at the outside of Hillary's office....it's all that's on...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on November 30, 2007, 04:17:38 PM
Greta did not know if Dave was oon the same flight with Beth.  I wonder what time they are supposed to meet with Mos?


I have believed in Mos from the beginning......but my trust is now shaking....A LOT!  Was the a carefully orchestrated release.with Dave and Beth arriving?? ..I know Mos didn't do the releasing....did he not present enough to hold them? Does he has more? ..who was the frigging judge??  Why in the hell didn't they bring a new judge or three in from Holland to handle these proceeding??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: igsigs on November 30, 2007, 04:17:48 PM
At least...

Hans knows that he must speak. But it is hard to imagine how he will wriggle out of this....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: casa on November 30, 2007, 04:18:04 PM
Angie, do you know what time the press conference is supposed to be?  I'm gonna be heading out of town soon.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on November 30, 2007, 04:18:19 PM
Joran's motion dismissed means I think only that the judge made the decision and the decision was no TV, no parents and visitors, only old magazines and books and some exercise - that's what I got out of RU - but I could be wrong


But Joran did not get a really good ruling - so that is a very good sign I think....I hope

I hope to canary....I hope too


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on November 30, 2007, 04:18:59 PM
This is all just so wrong.....so wrong.  :smt009


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Katysmom on November 30, 2007, 04:19:06 PM
This is not neccessarily bad news about the Kalpoes being released.  Let's wait and hear what Mos has to say.  What really would of been bad, is if the kept the 2k's and released Baby Huey; then we would know for sure the 2k's have been chosen as the sacrificial lambs


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: chelebele on November 30, 2007, 04:19:27 PM
and can they still try them for anything since they've been released, or does that mean they won't be tried because there isn't enough evidence?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on November 30, 2007, 04:19:31 PM
I hope someone carries the press conference.



me too...I'm getting sick of looking at the outside of Hillary's office....it's all that's on...

Me Too!  There supposed to be doing a presser soon too in NH.  It will probably be the same time as Mos's and they'll show NH first :(


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: San on November 30, 2007, 04:20:09 PM
At least...

Hans knows that he must speak. But it is hard to imagine how he will wriggle out of this....

He has it all planned  :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: klaasend on November 30, 2007, 04:20:20 PM
From Greta's blog:

November 30th, 2007 4:12 PM Eastern

How Would You Like THIS ?? My Timing On The Call Was Lousy
by Greta Van Susteren

When news broke that the Kalpoes would be or are released from jail in Aruba I immediately hit the phones. I was told by a good source in Aruba that it is indeed true.

I then called Beth Holloway….she answered her phone….I could hear noise in the background….I said, “where are you?” She said, “we just landed in Aruba…I just turned on my cell phone ….we are on the taxi way headed to the terminal….”

I then had the horrible job of explaining my call. Her voice dropped. She is very disappointed. We talked briefly and she was unsure whether she would just turn around and return to the USA or spend the night. As I noted, she is very disappointed. She was in Aruba in hopes of getting answers about her daughter…remember, that so called “new incriminating evidence.”

She said her plane was turning around in an hour and going back to the USA and that she might just see if she could buy a ticket and re-board.. She was in Aruba to speak to the new Chief Prosecutor but now the trip seemed to lack any purporse. I told her I would call her in an hour. She said ok.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on November 30, 2007, 04:20:37 PM
Ren~Ho don't give a ratz ass about  Beth..  The sjank posted THIS about the earthquake. Ren~ho is probably having a big orgasm at the moment..  Calling Greta to report Kalpoes release,,  <sorry to be gross>



Glenda Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2007 4:43 pm

I thought that shake was Beth landing on Aruba.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Frank on November 30, 2007, 04:20:37 PM
As far as Dave goes, we're aren't confirming that he is on his way are we? I can't find where he said he is going to Aruba?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Katysmom on November 30, 2007, 04:21:38 PM
OT!
 
EVEL KNIEVEL HAD DIED


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on November 30, 2007, 04:21:50 PM
Janet,

Respectfully, you are already on the roller coaster with us. Your work will not be in vain.

Being right will not ease the pain, so I say, let go and bring the positive energy, we've gotten off the canvas before and we will again if we have to.

A bible to Joran is what a cross is to vampires. He will burn, one way or another, the van der sloots will burn.

Frank ... I concede ... your incite was right on ... I was unkowningly ... once again ... on the Aruban roller coaster with all the Monkey.

If the news is accurate and ... the Kalpoes have been released ... I suspect that all the happenings of the past week were a collaborated last hurrah by Aruba prior to closing the Natalee Holloway case and ... the prosecutor had zilch or ... the judges ... Paulus' friends and associates ... are disregarding the evidence.

Either way ... my heart breaks for Natalee's family and ... I am sooo angry.

If the  Dutch and Aruban administrations were serious in regards to their desire that justice for Natalee Holloway prevails ... an outside investigative agency ... one whose members have no personal or professional relationship with Paulus van der Sloot would be requested.  I cannot comprehend how the Dutch and Arubans are allowed to investigate ... prosecute and ... judge their own.  What is the definition of "conflict of interest" under Dutch law?

Janet

+++++++++++++++++++

Jossy Mansur
NANCY GRACE
October 4, 2005


GRACE:  Jossy, regarding the connection, what I perceived to be a close connection between the judge, Paulus Van Der Sloot and the retired chief of police who initially handled Natalee`s case, Van Der Stratten, were they friends?

MANSUR: Of course, they were friends. It stands to reason they were friends because Paul Van Der Sloot had many friends within the police department; he had many friends within the Department of Justice. And he had many friends with -- and he was friendly with all the judges in Aruba. He worked out of the same office as they did and did the same work.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on November 30, 2007, 04:22:07 PM
Greta did not know if Dave was oon the same flight with Beth.  I wonder what time they are supposed to meet with Mos?


I have believed in Mos from the beginning......but my trust is now shaking....A LOT!  Was the a carefully orchestrated release.with Dave and Beth arriving?? ..I know Mos didn't do the releasing....did he not present enough to hold them? Does he has more? ..who was the frigging judge??  Why in the hell didn't they bring a new judge or three in from Holland to handle these proceeding??

All very good questions.  I don't if this was a 'blunder' by Mos or if the evidence was not strong or if the judge is an idiot.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on November 30, 2007, 04:22:13 PM
Angie, do you know what time the press conference is supposed to be?  I'm gonna be heading out of town soon.

 Casa.. 4:30? 5:30? Not sure.. but CUZ asked me to call back if i hear more since shes stuck at work.   :-|


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: snoopy on November 30, 2007, 04:22:28 PM
and can they still try them for anything since they've been released, or does that mean they won't be tried because there isn't enough evidence?

I think it means that MOS just didn't present enough evidence.  They can still be brought to trial with more evidence.  Geez who the heck knows.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: igsigs on November 30, 2007, 04:23:00 PM
and can they still try them for anything since they've been released, or does that mean they won't be tried because there isn't enough evidence?

We should know more after Hans speaks - but i think that they can still be charged.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: mishy on November 30, 2007, 04:24:05 PM
From Greta's blog:

November 30th, 2007 4:12 PM Eastern

How Would You Like THIS ?? My Timing On The Call Was Lousy
by Greta Van Susteren

When news broke that the Kalpoes would be or are released from jail in Aruba I immediately hit the phones. I was told by a good source in Aruba that it is indeed true.

I then called Beth Holloway….she answered her phone….I could hear noise in the background….I said, “where are you?” She said, “we just landed in Aruba…I just turned on my cell phone ….we are on the taxi way headed to the terminal….”

I then had the horrible job of explaining my call. Her voice dropped. She is very disappointed. We talked briefly and she was unsure whether she would just turn around and return to the USA or spend the night. As I noted, she is very disappointed. She was in Aruba in hopes of getting answers about her daughter…remember, that so called “new incriminating evidence.”

She said her plane was turning around in an hour and going back to the USA and that she might just see if she could buy a ticket and re-board.. She was in Aruba to speak to the new Chief Prosecutor but now the trip seemed to lack any purporse. I told her I would call her in an hour. She said ok.



This just breaks my heart. I am praying for Beth right now...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Helen Back on November 30, 2007, 04:24:50 PM
From Greta's blog:

November 30th, 2007 4:12 PM Eastern

How Would You Like THIS ?? My Timing On The Call Was Lousy
by Greta Van Susteren

When news broke that the Kalpoes would be or are released from jail in Aruba I immediately hit the phones. I was told by a good source in Aruba that it is indeed true.

I then called Beth Holloway….she answered her phone….I could hear noise in the background….I said, “where are you?” She said, “we just landed in Aruba…I just turned on my cell phone ….we are on the taxi way headed to the terminal….”

I then had the horrible job of explaining my call. Her voice dropped. She is very disappointed. We talked briefly and she was unsure whether she would just turn around and return to the USA or spend the night. As I noted, she is very disappointed. She was in Aruba in hopes of getting answers about her daughter…remember, that so called “new incriminating evidence.”

She said her plane was turning around in an hour and going back to the USA and that she might just see if she could buy a ticket and re-board.. She was in Aruba to speak to the new Chief Prosecutor but now the trip seemed to lack any purporse. I told her I would call her in an hour. She said ok.



All of this sad news for Beth and thoughts of changing her travel plans and meeting with Mos, based on her good source, Julia Renfro.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: casa on November 30, 2007, 04:25:18 PM
Angie, do you know what time the press conference is supposed to be?  I'm gonna be heading out of town soon.

 Casa.. 4:30? 5:30? Not sure.. but CUZ asked me to call back if i hear more since shes stuck at work.   :-|

Glad that you are keeping in touch with her!  I am headed out of town for the week end.  I will be away from a tv or computer until about 5:30 or 6.  If you hear anything that I should know give me a call on my cell.  I'm gonna go by and check on the Cuz before I leave town in about 45 minutes. Thanks Angie! 

Everyone keep the faith and continue to hope!  As long as Joran is still being held I'm going to try to be confident!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: klaasend on November 30, 2007, 04:25:21 PM
http://www.diario-aruba.com/2007/11/30/

A badly informed lawyer


By: Jossy M. Mansur

Once again this man, who thinks himself a star lawyer, has given various televised interviews in which he unfortunately proves that he has no control over his emotions, and uttered one nonsense after the other in angry tone he could not camouflage! What is he looking for really? Popularity? This certainly is not the way to achieve his goal!

I have an immense regard for Greta, but I can't understand why she gives this man the last word and doesn't let us confront him. Neither does she with the facts of the case, which Greta is fully aware of, I'm sure. Maybe in the US, there might be some people that are afraid of his tongue and temper, but with me, he is climbing the wrong tree!

How does a lawyer who pretends to have any class, say that what I've quoted from Joran's deposition isn't true? I again publish this document in the original Dutch, with a translation in English. This should put duct tape on Tacopina's mouth.

In the referred document, Joran said to four Aruban police officers that he thinks he might know where Natalee's body is buried, and that he thinks that Deepak went back to the beach where the girl was lying on the sand, raped and killed Natalee, and afterward buried her close to the first fishermen's hut! And he also wants to ignore a taped conversation in a police car, where the three suspects (Joran, Deepak and Satish were sitting in the back seat), trying to make his client, Joran, come out "innocent" in his confrontation with Deepak. Does this lawyer know how to read? Or is he simply dumb? Deepak said directly to Joran (and the police have this tape!): "if they find the girl, you are looking at 15 years in prison! What did he mean by that? That Joran is "innocent" or "guilty" of something that will send him behind bars for so many years? Can this big-mouthed lawyer understand this? Or does he only want to impose his street style here too? Attacking my evidence based on real facts won't help his client, and if he doesn't stop painting Joran like an angel, I'll find myself forced to publish everything we have found out about him since he was 8 years old! He is certainly no "angel", believe me!

Let Tacopina understand once and for all that I have 33 years of journalism in Aruba behind me, and that if the American media ask for my comments, it is because they are aware that I know more than Tacopina thinks! Could he possibly be trying to break my credibility with the American People, by his clownish acts on TV? I've always spoken the truth to them! I have nothing to hide from anyone. My relationship with David Kock and Ronny Wix, the defense lawyers for the Kalpoe brothers is excellent! They have the professional ethics that Tacopina lacks and a good sense in the practice of law, of that I'm sure!

In my opinion, Paulus committed a critical error when he hired Tacopina to defend Joran, because he doesn't know our environment, he is not up-to-date directly on what happened to Natalee, and all his "knowledge" seems to come from what he has read about the case. I'm sure he doesn't have half of the documents that DIARIO has. Furthermore, we have additional documents that no other media can even dream of having, and that's because we are serious journalists that respect authorities and cooperate with them when asked to do so.

I've said on Greta's show that the three suspects know very well what happened to Natalee, because they were the last ones that were with her on the night of her disappearance. Forget about the tales that from Carlos and Charlies they left her at the Holiday Inn or at the beach close to the Marriott! The story about going behind the Lighthouse to see sharks also leaves lots of doubts. There are contradicting testimonies from Joran, Deepak and Satish! Joran said that they went to his apartment from Carlos and Charlies; the Kalpoe brothers have completely denied that statement. They have declared to the police that they didn't go to that apartment! Which party is telling the truth? And Joran declared that Deepak picked him up at the beach, but Deepak denied that allegation. And then Joran said it was Satish that picked him up! But Satish also denied that he picked him up! The big question Tacopina has to answer is: How did Joran get back home that night? Did he walk? Did Paulus pick him up? Or was there someone else?

And can Tacopina explain to us how his client did the miracle of letting his shoes grow from size 11 to size 14 in one night?

These are some of the discrepancies that authorities have been investigating again, because they don't make any sense! For instance, what was the real relationship between Joran and Koen? Why did he leave the island one or two days after Natalee disappeared? Why, when Art Wood and Dave, Natalee's father, asked authorities to interrogate him, it wasn't done? Why hasn't he been interrogated so far? My reliable sources tell me that Koen knows exactly what happened that night!

If Tacopina thinks that we're not aware of ALL the details of this case, he is badly mistaken! The truth is that we honor our word and will not reveal what we know from our police and judicial sources when asked not to do so! What is said to us in trust will never be betrayed, because then we would be betraying our principles!

I hope this case goes to Court as soon as possible, and if Joran, Deepak and Satish are innocent, they will be cleared by the judge. And if one or more are guilty, this also will be determined by the evidence presented to the presiding Judge. My advice to Tacopina? Stay in the US! Your presence in Aruba will only cause more harm to Joran! Believe me!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Frank on November 30, 2007, 04:25:37 PM
Beth must meet with the prosecutor regardless!

She must look him in the eyes!!!

Please anyone who can contact her, Red, she must confront Mos!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on November 30, 2007, 04:26:19 PM
As far as Dave goes, we're aren't confirming that he is on his way are we? I can't find where he said he is going to Aruba?

 HI Frank  .. this was posted earlier....


Beth & Dave to Meet on Saturday w/ Chief Prosecutor

ORANJESTAD, Aruba (CNN) -- The chief prosecutor in the Natalee Holloway investigation has agreed to meet Saturday with the parents of the missing Alabama teen, who is presumed dead.


Natalee Holloway disappeared while on vacation in Aruba with classmates in 2005.

"I'm really anxious to meet him," Beth Holloway told CNN. "I've waited a long time for this meeting."

A lawyer for Beth Holloway contacted prosecutor Hans Mos last week after suspects Joran van der Sloot and brothers Satish and Deepak Kalpoe were arrested on suspicion of manslaughter.

"There's no doubt in my mind that [Natalee Holloway] is dead. ... I think we have enough evidence to prove the girl is not alive anymore, even without a body," Mos said last week.

Natalee Holloway's mother said she has hope that Mos will be able to solve the case.

"He seems great. The case seems to be handled well. I'm going to ask him some long-awaited questions," she said.

The family is encouraged that the meeting will take place, Holloway attorney John Kelly told CNN. Two years ago, the previous chief prosecutor -- who has since returned to the Netherlands -- would not sit down with them.

Kelly said Beth Holloway and her ex-husband, Dave, want to share information they've gathered since their daughter disappeared in May 2005 while on vacation with about 100 classmates. See a timeline of the case »

Neither he nor Beth Holloway would provide details.

Questions about evidence

Lawyers for the three suspects were in court in Aruba on Thursday on behalf of their clients. They argued that last week's rearrests were baseless and that prosecutors have no new evidence against their clients. They said they have no idea what happened to Holloway.

As he rushed out of the closed hearing before a judge, van der Sloot's lawyer told CNN that authorities have no reason to hold van der Sloot in jail again as they did two years ago. He said the so-called new incriminating evidence is worthless.

"To say it's less than nothing is too much. But it's not very much. It's very, very thin," Ariean de Bie said.

Van der Sloot's parents were allowed to provide him with a Bible but no other reading materials, the lawyer said. Van der Sloot is forbidden from seeing any visitors and can meet only with his lawyers and interrogators.

De Bie said van der Sloot has not provided authorities with any new information since his rearrest and extradition from the Netherlands, where he'd been attending college. He said his client would rather be anywhere than in a prison cell.

"He's not very happy about it," the attorney said.

Van der Sloot's co-counsel -- New York attorney Joe Tacopina -- said he has no doubt his client is innocent.

"Whatever they're holding in their bag, whatever they don't want to show anyone ... it's not going to amount to a hill of beans against Joran van der Sloot because he had no involvement in Natalee's disappearance," Tacopina told CNN.

Tacopina said he'll be in Aruba next week and try to meet with van der Sloot in his jail cell.

Attorneys for the Kalpoe brothers will meet with a judge in separate jailhouse hearings Friday to argue that their clients should be set free and not held another eight days.

A judge will decide whether prosecutors can continue to hold the Kalpoes even longer.

Van der Sloot will have a similar hearing next Friday when prosecutors are expected to ask to keep him jailed another 60 days.

Mos has said he hopes to decide by the end of the year whether he will try all three suspects for Holloway's presumed death, which he suggests was an accident. The prosecutor won't say what his new evidence is until his investigation is complete.

New search for remains

The Holloways still have not given up the search for their daughter. In fact, a benefactor is donating an estimated $500,000 to help map the waters offshore.

On Thursday, Natalee's father watched Louis Schaeffer's crew load a boat equipped with the latest sonar equipment and a remote operated vehicle (ROV) to search the waters where Holloway's remains might be.

"I've got a feeling that if she's in the ocean, these guys are gonna find her," Dave Holloway said. "No doubt about it." Watch an interview with Natalee Holloway's father »

Schaeffer said he's retired, has the money, and was touched by the Holloways' tragedy and wanted to help.

"My only objective is to find Natalee, to bring her home for Dave and Beth and also to help identify the people that did this to her. This is a terrible thing, an injustice, and I want to help solve the case," said Schaeffer.

"We've known since [May 2005], the FBI told us Natalee's not with us anymore," Dave Holloway said.

The boat is expected to take about 10 days to get to Aruba. It'll take a few more days to set up a search.

The family says it has no new information about where to look. The Holloways just want to exhaust every area they can offshore with equipment that wasn't available to them two years ago.


Thanks to Schaefer, that's changed.

"We are just so thankful that he's got a big heart and willing to do that," Dave Holloway said. E-mail to a friend

CNN's Tracy Sabo contributed to this report.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: San on November 30, 2007, 04:26:20 PM
From Greta's blog:

November 30th, 2007 4:12 PM Eastern

How Would You Like THIS ?? My Timing On The Call Was Lousy
by Greta Van Susteren

When news broke that the Kalpoes would be or are released from jail in Aruba I immediately hit the phones. I was told by a good source in Aruba that it is indeed true.

I then called Beth Holloway….she answered her phone….I could hear noise in the background….I said, “where are you?” She said, “we just landed in Aruba…I just turned on my cell phone ….we are on the taxi way headed to the terminal….”

I then had the horrible job of explaining my call. Her voice dropped. She is very disappointed. We talked briefly and she was unsure whether she would just turn around and return to the USA or spend the night. As I noted, she is very disappointed. She was in Aruba in hopes of getting answers about her daughter…remember, that so called “new incriminating evidence.”

She said her plane was turning around in an hour and going back to the USA and that she might just see if she could buy a ticket and re-board.. She was in Aruba to speak to the new Chief Prosecutor but now the trip seemed to lack any purporse. I told her I would call her in an hour. She said ok.

Beth needs to get the hell out of Aruba and fast.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on November 30, 2007, 04:26:44 PM
UNBELIEVABLE.
   :-? :sad:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yxXZSa1rYC8


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Buckeye on November 30, 2007, 04:26:44 PM
CNN originally said Mos conference at 4:30 Eastern time.........don't know if they took aruba island time into consideration.........


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on November 30, 2007, 04:27:22 PM
Angie, do you know what time the press conference is supposed to be?  I'm gonna be heading out of town soon.

 Casa.. 4:30? 5:30? Not sure.. but CUZ asked me to call back if i hear more since shes stuck at work.   :-|

Glad that you are keeping in touch with her!  I am headed out of town for the week end.  I will be away from a tv or computer until about 5:30 or 6.  If you hear anything that I should know give me a call on my cell.  I'm gonna go by and check on the Cuz before I leave town in about 45 minutes. Thanks Angie! 

Everyone keep the faith and continue to hope!  As long as Joran is still being held I'm going to try to be confident!

  Will do Casa  :)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: mishy on November 30, 2007, 04:28:25 PM
Angie, do you know what time the press conference is supposed to be?  I'm gonna be heading out of town soon.

 Casa.. 4:30? 5:30? Not sure.. but CUZ asked me to call back if i hear more since shes stuck at work.   :-|

Glad that you are keeping in touch with her!  I am headed out of town for the week end.  I will be away from a tv or computer until about 5:30 or 6.  If you hear anything that I should know give me a call on my cell.  I'm gonna go by and check on the Cuz before I leave town in about 45 minutes. Thanks Angie! 

Everyone keep the faith and continue to hope!  As long as Joran is still being held I'm going to try to be confident!

Casa,
Please give her a hug from us and let her know we're praying...

Thanks for going to check on her, sweetie  :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on November 30, 2007, 04:29:01 PM
http://www.diario-aruba.com/2007/11/30/

A badly informed lawyer


By: Jossy M. Mansur

Once again this man, who thinks himself a star lawyer, has given various televised interviews in which he unfortunately proves that he has no control over his emotions, and uttered one nonsense after the other in angry tone he could not camouflage! What is he looking for really? Popularity? This certainly is not the way to achieve his goal!

I have an immense regard for Greta, but I can't understand why she gives this man the last word and doesn't let us confront him. Neither does she with the facts of the case, which Greta is fully aware of, I'm sure. Maybe in the US, there might be some people that are afraid of his tongue and temper, but with me, he is climbing the wrong tree!

How does a lawyer who pretends to have any class, say that what I've quoted from Joran's deposition isn't true? I again publish this document in the original Dutch, with a translation in English. This should put duct tape on Tacopina's mouth.

In the referred document, Joran said to four Aruban police officers that he thinks he might know where Natalee's body is buried, and that he thinks that Deepak went back to the beach where the girl was lying on the sand, raped and killed Natalee, and afterward buried her close to the first fishermen's hut! And he also wants to ignore a taped conversation in a police car, where the three suspects (Joran, Deepak and Satish were sitting in the back seat), trying to make his client, Joran, come out "innocent" in his confrontation with Deepak. Does this lawyer know how to read? Or is he simply dumb? Deepak said directly to Joran (and the police have this tape!): "if they find the girl, you are looking at 15 years in prison! What did he mean by that? That Joran is "innocent" or "guilty" of something that will send him behind bars for so many years? Can this big-mouthed lawyer understand this? Or does he only want to impose his street style here too? Attacking my evidence based on real facts won't help his client, and if he doesn't stop painting Joran like an angel, I'll find myself forced to publish everything we have found out about him since he was 8 years old! He is certainly no "angel", believe me!

Let Tacopina understand once and for all that I have 33 years of journalism in Aruba behind me, and that if the American media ask for my comments, it is because they are aware that I know more than Tacopina thinks! Could he possibly be trying to break my credibility with the American People, by his clownish acts on TV? I've always spoken the truth to them! I have nothing to hide from anyone. My relationship with David Kock and Ronny Wix, the defense lawyers for the Kalpoe brothers is excellent! They have the professional ethics that Tacopina lacks and a good sense in the practice of law, of that I'm sure!

In my opinion, Paulus committed a critical error when he hired Tacopina to defend Joran, because he doesn't know our environment, he is not up-to-date directly on what happened to Natalee, and all his "knowledge" seems to come from what he has read about the case. I'm sure he doesn't have half of the documents that DIARIO has. Furthermore, we have additional documents that no other media can even dream of having, and that's because we are serious journalists that respect authorities and cooperate with them when asked to do so.

I've said on Greta's show that the three suspects know very well what happened to Natalee, because they were the last ones that were with her on the night of her disappearance. Forget about the tales that from Carlos and Charlies they left her at the Holiday Inn or at the beach close to the Marriott! The story about going behind the Lighthouse to see sharks also leaves lots of doubts. There are contradicting testimonies from Joran, Deepak and Satish! Joran said that they went to his apartment from Carlos and Charlies; the Kalpoe brothers have completely denied that statement. They have declared to the police that they didn't go to that apartment! Which party is telling the truth? And Joran declared that Deepak picked him up at the beach, but Deepak denied that allegation. And then Joran said it was Satish that picked him up! But Satish also denied that he picked him up! The big question Tacopina has to answer is: How did Joran get back home that night? Did he walk? Did Paulus pick him up? Or was there someone else?

And can Tacopina explain to us how his client did the miracle of letting his shoes grow from size 11 to size 14 in one night?

These are some of the discrepancies that authorities have been investigating again, because they don't make any sense! For instance, what was the real relationship between Joran and Koen? Why did he leave the island one or two days after Natalee disappeared? Why, when Art Wood and Dave, Natalee's father, asked authorities to interrogate him, it wasn't done? Why hasn't he been interrogated so far? My reliable sources tell me that Koen knows exactly what happened that night!

If Tacopina thinks that we're not aware of ALL the details of this case, he is badly mistaken! The truth is that we honor our word and will not reveal what we know from our police and judicial sources when asked not to do so! What is said to us in trust will never be betrayed, because then we would be betraying our principles!

I hope this case goes to Court as soon as possible, and if Joran, Deepak and Satish are innocent, they will be cleared by the judge. And if one or more are guilty, this also will be determined by the evidence presented to the presiding Judge. My advice to Tacopina? Stay in the US! Your presence in Aruba will only cause more harm to Joran! Believe me!


Thanks Klaas


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: mishy on November 30, 2007, 04:30:32 PM
UNBELIEVABLE.
   :-? :sad:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yxXZSa1rYC8


Carpe, it almost sounds like Greta was crying at the beginning of that...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: klaasend on November 30, 2007, 04:31:13 PM
Posted on the front page of SM:

EURobert wrote:

I haven’t given up all hope yet. There could be a possibility that the two are released because there’s no necessity to hold them longer in order to continue the investigation / interrogation of JvdS. Maybe they are not allowed to leave the island.

It’s still open…



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: kathyn2 on November 30, 2007, 04:32:41 PM
I told you this was all a sham.  Such a shame.   Just another aruban fiasco.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: snoopy on November 30, 2007, 04:33:11 PM


Go Jossy!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Port Valerie on November 30, 2007, 04:34:01 PM
Greta on.

Kalpoes being released as we speak.

Apparently the judge is unconvinced that there's incriminating new evidence.

Greta called Beth, had to tell her. Her voice sunk. Beth is there in Aruba to meet with Mos. Was profoundly disappointed, said "I might just get back on this plane and go back to the US.'

Bottom line, a judge is not convinced that the "new evidence" is new or that it's incriminating or both.

So says Greta.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 30, 2007, 04:34:16 PM
This case is closed..guys. Face it!  Evil wins again...there will be no justice for Natalee...ever. My heart can't take it anymore...I can't imagine what the family is feeling.  Hans Mos was playing us all and the Dutch will forever be linked to the unsolved disappearance of Natalee Holloway.  FOREVER!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Kimmy53 on November 30, 2007, 04:35:09 PM
Beth must meet with the prosecutor regardless!

She must look him in the eyes!!!

Please anyone who can contact her, Red, she must confront Mos!

Hell yeah Frank.... She should meet with him. At least make him tell her face to face.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on November 30, 2007, 04:36:12 PM
http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/americas/11/30/aruba.holloway/index.html

Brothers to be freed in Natalee Holloway case

ORANJESTAD, Aruba (CNN) -- Two of the suspects being held in connection with Natalee Holloway's presumed death will be released from custody.

Prosecutors wanted Deepak and Satish Kalpoe held in Aruba for another eight days, but a judge rejected their request Friday, according to a prosecution spokesman.

A third man, Joran van der Sloot, is still being held in the case.

The three were the last people to be seen with the Alabama teen before she disappeared in May 2005.

They were all re-arrested last week.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: klaasend on November 30, 2007, 04:36:43 PM
I'm not going to allow myself to get as NEGATIVE about this as some of you.  I really get tired of the defeatist attitude.

So..I'm going to the store, brb.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on November 30, 2007, 04:36:57 PM
Beth must meet with the prosecutor regardless!

She must look him in the eyes!!!

Please anyone who can contact her, Red, she must confront Mos!

I agree Frank,  I couldn't leave without confronting him, though I can also understand her feelings too.  I hope Dave is there or gets there soon, so she is not alone.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: mishy on November 30, 2007, 04:37:45 PM
let's just see what Mos says at the press conference...But I know how you feel. I feel like we've all been duped (again). Let's concentrate on Beth right now and send her our strength and prayers. She must be sooooo devastated right now, but I do think she'll stay and meet with Mos. I really hope she's not alone...she's gone through more than one person should ever have to bear...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on November 30, 2007, 04:38:51 PM
Beth must meet with the prosecutor regardless!

She must look him in the eyes!!!

Please anyone who can contact her, Red, she must confront Mos!

I agree Frank,  I couldn't leave without confronting him, though I can also understand her feelings too.  I hope Dave is there or gets there soon, so she is not alone.

Well, I can understand Beth not wanting to at this point.  She has been lied to by people aon Aruba from day one.  What would be the point in listening to more BS coming from the God forsaken rock?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Port Valerie on November 30, 2007, 04:38:59 PM
Let's wait and see if the Kalpoes leave the country. That would mean they squealed.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Helen Back on November 30, 2007, 04:39:40 PM
I'm not going to allow myself to get as NEGATIVE about this as some of you.  I really get tired of the defeatist attitude.

So..I'm going to the store, brb.

I'm with ya, Klaas!  Thanks for the Diario Article. 




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Port Valerie on November 30, 2007, 04:40:02 PM
Beth will not go back to the US. She will confront Mos about this. She is in this till the end.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on November 30, 2007, 04:40:23 PM
I'm not going to allow myself to get as NEGATIVE about this as some of you.  I really get tired of the defeatist attitude.

So..I'm going to the store, brb.

I DO have some small hopes in the fact they didn't release Joran nor give him everything he wanted.  Maybe K2's gave some incrimitating info. (finally seeing they were going to take the fall).   I wanna hear Mos.!  I hope it's not the same time as news conf. in NH! 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Scandi on November 30, 2007, 04:40:44 PM
Hi,  I was in a state of shock listening to the breaking news on TV, but in being interviewed I heard Greta explain about the arrests.  The arrests of the K2's was a prosecutors call and not due to any new evidence examined by a judge.

Such was not the case for Joran, as he was in Holland, and the judge made the decision to have him arrested, evidently on this new evidence.

Did anyone else hear this?  I was in such a state I can't remember who Greta was talking to?  lol


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on November 30, 2007, 04:41:03 PM
CNN Headline news just reported they won't be released until tomorrow.....
?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on November 30, 2007, 04:41:50 PM
Let's wait and see if the Kalpoes leave the country. That would mean they squealed.



Lord!  I hope so!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: greeneyedlady on November 30, 2007, 04:42:34 PM
WTF? Say it ain't so!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Port Valerie on November 30, 2007, 04:42:59 PM
CNN Headline news just reported they won't be released until tomorrow.....
?

Maybe they are being sent somewhere for their own protection. That would mean they talked.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on November 30, 2007, 04:43:08 PM
CNN Headline news just reported they won't be released until tomorrow.....
?

I heard that on Fox too.  Beth really needs to stay and talk to Mos..   I would hope he doesn't make them wait until tomorrow now.  Maybe he will meet with them asap.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Katysmom on November 30, 2007, 04:43:35 PM
I'm not going to allow myself to get as NEGATIVE about this as some of you.  I really get tired of the defeatist attitude.

So..I'm going to the store, brb.

I'm with you Kaas; i'm willing to wait until all the cards have been laid out on the table.  Something's going on, we just don't know what it is and I don't think this is going to turn out to be a bad thing.  PATIENCE PEOPLE!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tylergal on November 30, 2007, 04:43:50 PM
All along we have been advising the Kalpoes to talk and rat out Joran and now that this may have been what happened, we lose all hope.  The ballgame is not over.  We are in the 4th quarter, but let's wait.  I am hoping the reason the Kalpoes have been released is because they have spilled the beans and so has Freddy.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on November 30, 2007, 04:44:42 PM
Hi,  I was in a state of shock listening to the breaking news on TV, but in being interviewed I heard Greta explain about the arrests.  The arrests of the K2's was a prosecutors call and not due to any new evidence examined by a judge.

Such was not the case for Joran, as he was in Holland, and the judge made the decision to have him arrested, evidently on this new evidence.

Did anyone else hear this?  I was in such a state I can't remember who Greta was talking to?  lol

Greta is only speculating.  She doesn't know what info the prosecutor has at this point 

I think Beth should leave Aruba immediately.  Again...I would not be at all surprised if they tried some BS arrest of her today.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: BlueKYGirl on November 30, 2007, 04:44:47 PM
I'm choosing to hold out hope as long as Joran's in custody--maybe this just means they're not going to allow him to pin it all on the Kalpoes.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: cubbeegirl on November 30, 2007, 04:48:11 PM
Oh nooooo..... I just got off work and have a little while at my friends house waiting for her to get home and doing a load of laundry cause my washing machine just bit the dust, log and and hear that k2 have been released?????


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on November 30, 2007, 04:49:06 PM
Oh nooooo..... I just got off work and have a little while at my friends house waiting for her to get home and doing a load of laundry cause my washing machine just bit the dust, log and and hear that k2 have been released?????
Hey girl !

Yep.. but dunno why as of yet?   :-x


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on November 30, 2007, 04:49:33 PM
Ia m absolutely torn down the middle...part of me think this is just Bullcrap...well planned and executed....the have still wants to believe...so I am just gonna go get drunk!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on November 30, 2007, 04:50:39 PM
Oh nooooo..... I just got off work and have a little while at my friends house waiting for her to get home and doing a load of laundry cause my washing machine just bit the dust, log and and hear that k2 have been released?????

Hi Cubbee......thats what being reported...they WILL Be released


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: wreck on November 30, 2007, 04:50:45 PM
I'm not jumping ship. Remember, it was supposedly Joran who was the one "infiltrated."  It has been Taco wildly pointing the blame off his client and onto the Kalpoes. This "release" flies in the face of Joe T.
Let's wait and see what Mos has to say. Did he gamble that the tiny bits of information he let out was just enough to detain them? Should he have exposed more of his hand?
I don't know. I just think there is a lot more here than meets the eye.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on November 30, 2007, 04:50:48 PM
Ia m absolutely torn down the middle...part of me think this is just Bullcrap...well planned and executed....the have still wants to believe...so I am just gonna go get drunk!!


 :lol:  Sounds like fun Sunny..  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Port Valerie on November 30, 2007, 04:51:03 PM
CNN Headline news just reported they won't be released until tomorrow.....
?

I heard that on Fox too.  Beth really needs to stay and talk to Mos..   I would hope he doesn't make them wait until tomorrow now.  Maybe he will meet with them asap.

Last time they were released instantly, weren't they?

Look, released is released. Not-released is not-released.

They're still in jail tonight.

Need pictures. Like last time -- Kalpoes exiting jail with black plastic bags with their belongings, Nadira greeting them with smiles and hugs. Till then, who knows for sure?



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: cubbeegirl on November 30, 2007, 04:52:29 PM
From Greta's blog:

November 30th, 2007 4:12 PM Eastern

How Would You Like THIS ?? My Timing On The Call Was Lousy
by Greta Van Susteren

When news broke that the Kalpoes would be or are released from jail in Aruba I immediately hit the phones. I was told by a good source in Aruba that it is indeed true.

I then called Beth Holloway….she answered her phone….I could hear noise in the background….I said, “where are you?” She said, “we just landed in Aruba…I just turned on my cell phone ….we are on the taxi way headed to the terminal….”

I then had the horrible job of explaining my call. Her voice dropped. She is very disappointed. We talked briefly and she was unsure whether she would just turn around and return to the USA or spend the night. As I noted, she is very disappointed. She was in Aruba in hopes of getting answers about her daughter…remember, that so called “new incriminating evidence.”

She said her plane was turning around in an hour and going back to the USA and that she might just see if she could buy a ticket and re-board.. She was in Aruba to speak to the new Chief Prosecutor but now the trip seemed to lack any purporse. I told her I would call her in an hour. She said ok.



All of this sad news for Beth and thoughts of changing her travel plans and meeting with Mos, based on her good source, Julia Renfro.




This just truly breaks my heart, I am sitting here reading this and looking at a picture of little Kaitlin on her mothers computer desk and feeling very angry and very depressed...

Angielala, please call me soon!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Observer on November 30, 2007, 04:53:55 PM
Don't get down everyone..Let Beth and Dave speak to Hans Mos from the heart. Everyone knows it was a coverup and we are all still waiting for that to be exposed. And if it never is then Americans should boycott the hell out of Aruba!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on November 30, 2007, 04:54:06 PM
Ia m absolutely torn down the middle...part of me think this is just Bullcrap...well planned and executed....the have still wants to believe...so I am just gonna go get drunk!!


 :lol:  Sounds like fun Sunny..  :wink:

well it's five o'clock somewhere and  I hear margaritas calling my name...LOUDLY!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on November 30, 2007, 04:54:23 PM
From Greta's blog:

November 30th, 2007 4:12 PM Eastern

How Would You Like THIS ?? My Timing On The Call Was Lousy
by Greta Van Susteren

When news broke that the Kalpoes would be or are released from jail in Aruba I immediately hit the phones. I was told by a good source in Aruba that it is indeed true.

I then called Beth Holloway….she answered her phone….I could hear noise in the background….I said, “where are you?” She said, “we just landed in Aruba…I just turned on my cell phone ….we are on the taxi way headed to the terminal….”

I then had the horrible job of explaining my call. Her voice dropped. She is very disappointed. We talked briefly and she was unsure whether she would just turn around and return to the USA or spend the night. As I noted, she is very disappointed. She was in Aruba in hopes of getting answers about her daughter…remember, that so called “new incriminating evidence.”

She said her plane was turning around in an hour and going back to the USA and that she might just see if she could buy a ticket and re-board.. She was in Aruba to speak to the new Chief Prosecutor but now the trip seemed to lack any purporse. I told her I would call her in an hour. She said ok.



All of this sad news for Beth and thoughts of changing her travel plans and meeting with Mos, based on her good source, Julia Renfro.




This just truly breaks my heart, I am sitting here reading this and looking at a picture of little Kaitlin on her mothers computer desk and feeling very angry and very depressed...

Angielala, please call me soon!!!

 I will


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Frank on November 30, 2007, 04:54:33 PM
I'm not jumping ship yet, but tell me they are not waiting for Steve Cohen to arrive in Aruba.

Man when Mos says he wants to reenact the crime, he really means it. I guess we can expect 6 or 7 more arrests/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Port Valerie on November 30, 2007, 04:54:44 PM
Don't get down everyone..Let Beth and Dave speak to Hans Mos from the heart. Everyone knows it was a coverup and we are all still waiting for that to be exposed. And if it never is then Americans should boycott the hell out of Aruba!!

Yeah.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: snoopy on November 30, 2007, 04:54:58 PM


I walked away for a few minutes.  I said a prayer for Beth.  For Dave.  For Matt.  For Jug and Robin.  For justice.  I come back renewed.  IMO they're going after Joran.  This is not over.  Never give up hope.   

Don't be discouraged
Don't be disheartened
God is in control


Justice is coming


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: mishy on November 30, 2007, 04:55:24 PM
Hi,  I was in a state of shock listening to the breaking news on TV, but in being interviewed I heard Greta explain about the arrests.  The arrests of the K2's was a prosecutors call and not due to any new evidence examined by a judge.

Such was not the case for Joran, as he was in Holland, and the judge made the decision to have him arrested, evidently on this new evidence.

Did anyone else hear this?  I was in such a state I can't remember who Greta was talking to?  lol

Thanks Scandi. If this is true, it does make me feel a wee bit (but not much) better...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on November 30, 2007, 04:55:24 PM
Don't get down everyone..Let Beth and Dave speak to Hans Mos from the heart. Everyone knows it was a coverup and we are all still waiting for that to be exposed. And if it never is then Americans should boycott the hell out of Aruba!!

 I agree OBS. I am trying my best to stay positive. but pissed at the same time.  :(


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: amanda on November 30, 2007, 04:56:44 PM
Hold on, Everyone; as we've all "heard" Mrs. Red say hundreds of times, "Keep the faith."  The powers that be in Aruba wouldn't dare jerk us (i.e. all we spectators and Natalee's family) around again.  There's no reason for them to do that.  They had distance, for whatever it was worth, behind them in this case.  If they weren't serious about solving this case, and believed these three were the key, there'd be no reason for them to go back to the height of their bad publicity.  They have something.  Remember the new prosecutor has publicly bragged that this case will not go unsolved on his watch.  There's no reason for him to say that if it only ends up making him look stupid and re-igniting the furor against Aruba.  He's confident for a reason.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on November 30, 2007, 04:57:19 PM
Ia m absolutely torn down the middle...part of me think this is just Bullcrap...well planned and executed....the have still wants to believe...so I am just gonna go get drunk!!


 :lol:  Sounds like fun Sunny..  :wink:

well it's five o'clock somewhere and  I hear margaritas calling my name...LOUDLY!!

Its 5 here. I need to go shower.. check back later ...   Have a few things I need to do.  :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Scandi on November 30, 2007, 04:57:46 PM
CNN Headline news just reported they won't be released until tomorrow.....
?

I heard that on Fox too.  Beth really needs to stay and talk to Mos..   I would hope he doesn't make them wait until tomorrow now.  Maybe he will meet with them asap.

Last time they were released instantly, weren't they?

Look, released is released. Not-released is not-released.

They're still in jail tonight.

Need pictures. Like last time -- Kalpoes exiting jail with black plastic bags with their belongings, Nadira greeting them with smiles and hugs. Till then, who knows for sure?



Hi Port Valerie,  I find myself stretching my imagination to wonder if mYbe Mos is down talking to the judge!  When this broke about an hour ago it was said they were being released as the reporter was speaking.  Could it be possible their being detained overnight is a new development?  I just don't know if this is possible under Aruban law, for the prosecutor to have a further say after the judge has made a ruling.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Canary on November 30, 2007, 04:58:13 PM
Lazlo at RU said it is because there is not enough evidence to hold them
Lazlo  PostPosted: Fri Nov 30, 2007 4:54 pm         

Probably mentioned already, but just in case, the Dutch media reports that the judge has ruled them to be released because he felt there was not enough evidence against Kalpoe brothers to hold them any longer.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: cubbeegirl on November 30, 2007, 04:59:24 PM


I walked away for a few minutes.  I said a prayer for Beth.  For Dave.  For Matt.  For Jug and Robin.  For justice.  I come back renewed.  IMO they're going after Joran.  This is not over.  Never give up hope.   

Don't be discouraged
Don't be disheartened
God is in control


Justice is coming


I hope and pray that this is not over Snoopy....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Frank on November 30, 2007, 04:59:57 PM
If the Dutch wanted to find Natalee, why didn't THEY send a boat?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: snoopy on November 30, 2007, 05:00:12 PM
Lazlo at RU said it is because there is not enough evidence to hold them
Lazlo  PostPosted: Fri Nov 30, 2007 4:54 pm         

Probably mentioned already, but just in case, the Dutch media reports that the judge has ruled them to be released because he felt there was not enough evidence against Kalpoe brothers to hold them any longer.

Yes and this doesn't mean that there isn't more evidence.  MOS is holding more.  Much more.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Frank on November 30, 2007, 05:00:37 PM
Dana's show tonight should be a classic!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Kiwi on November 30, 2007, 05:00:53 PM
Think of this as a poker game. You can throw in your hand now, or play your cards. This just needs to be played out. Remember the boat is still on its way. It's a card that could force them into jail for as they said, 15 years.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Katysmom on November 30, 2007, 05:02:09 PM
If the Dutch wanted to find Natalee, why didn't THEY send a boat?

My guess would be they don't have a boat with the same capabilities as the one that is headed there now.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: NYC_lover on November 30, 2007, 05:04:02 PM
Incredible again a BIG mistake from the OM. I see Hanssie boy sees in the media, yes there is new evidence to the K2.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on November 30, 2007, 05:04:26 PM
Ok...I have a frozen margarita in hand


something has been bothering me...Mos said he promised the k2's to close this by 12/31...that bothered me...

someone posted something today..copied from someplace...(no I am not drunk yet...just can't remember who posted it or from where)....deepak said to someone...tell the truth....cause his 8 days were over and he was walking out...HE KNEW he was being released.....

so..... have they been confront with what was learned from the 'new recordings' and did they confirm what ever and were promised to be set free if they gave evidence against the pervert killer???

I know I might be grasping at straws here...but I gotta go with the half of me that still believes


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on November 30, 2007, 05:05:29 PM
Think of this as a poker game. You can throw in your hand now, or play your cards. This just needs to be played out. Remember the boat is still on its way. It's a card that could force them into jail for as they said, 15 years.


Well I am glad I have not placed any bets.
This is outrageous. BRING ON THE OTHER ARRESTS!! Sweaty running man must be jumping for joy just thinking that his nice boy will be released too. I hate these people, all of them.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Scandi on November 30, 2007, 05:05:47 PM
Hi,  I was in a state of shock listening to the breaking news on TV, but in being interviewed I heard Greta explain about the arrests.  The arrests of the K2's was a prosecutors call and not due to any new evidence examined by a judge.

Such was not the case for Joran, as he was in Holland, and the judge made the decision to have him arrested, evidently on this new evidence.

Did anyone else hear this?  I was in such a state I can't remember who Greta was talking to?  lol

Thanks Scandi. If this is true, it does make me feel a wee bit (but not much) better...

De nada Mishy,  I am remaining positive too!  When I think that last night we were discussing Joran's claims that Deepak went back to the beach and raped and killed her, I think what were we doing?  Taking the word of a compulsive liar, planting such thoughts in our heads. 

That alone gives me hope, as if it were true I am sure with all of the investigating done the prosecutor would know this and have given the info to the judge.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Anna on November 30, 2007, 05:07:07 PM
If the Dutch wanted to find Natalee, why didn't THEY send a boat?

My guess would be they don't have a boat with the same capabilities as the one that is headed there now.

But they have been a seafaring nation for several hundred years and are home to Phillips Electronics, Philco, etc. probably the largest electronics company in the world.  It's possible they don't have this exact equipment if it is truly new and still under strict patent but I find it hard to believe they don't have anything similar.

All electronics are Philco world wide it seems, even medical.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Katysmom on November 30, 2007, 05:07:21 PM
Anyone hear any more on the presser Mos was supposed to give this afternoon?  I've been flipping between stations and all they're talking about is that b--ch hilary clinton


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on November 30, 2007, 05:07:45 PM
Ok...I have a frozen margarita in hand


something has been bothering me...Mos said he promised the k2's to close this by 12/31...that bothered me...

someone posted something today..copied from someplace...(no I am not drunk yet...just can't remember who posted it or from where)....deepak said to someone...tell the truth....cause his 8 days were over and he was walking out...HE KNEW he was being released.....

so..... have they been confront with what was learned from the 'new recordings' and did they confirm what ever and were promised to be set free if they gave evidence against the pervert killer???

I know I might be grasping at straws here...but I gotta go with the half of me that still believes


the 8 day remark was from 2005. It was only repeated on the boards today.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on November 30, 2007, 05:08:06 PM
Ia m absolutely torn down the middle...part of me think this is just Bullcrap...well planned and executed....the have still wants to believe...so I am just gonna go get drunk!!

Poor me a couple!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Observer on November 30, 2007, 05:08:59 PM
Latest from Greta

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SsiO-jwsd6A


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: cubbeegirl on November 30, 2007, 05:10:04 PM
I intend to keep the faith also... remember , Christmas is a time of miracles!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Anna on November 30, 2007, 05:10:08 PM
Anyone hear any more on the presser Mos was supposed to give this afternoon?  I've been flipping between stations and all they're talking about is that b--ch hilary clinton


I know!  I can't sit here all afternoon waiting.  Am beginning to think there will not be a presser or if there is, we are not going to get to see it.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: wreck on November 30, 2007, 05:12:37 PM
Didn't Deepak's attorney claim the other night that he had not been "questioned" since LAST Friday????? Hmmmm -- strange. Maybe the Kalpoe arrest was soley to confuse/addle Joran. Just a thought..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: mishy on November 30, 2007, 05:12:44 PM
I intend to keep the faith also... remember , Christmas is a time of miracles!!

Hey Cubbee,

Big hugs to you sweetie!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Anna on November 30, 2007, 05:13:09 PM
Then there is also the possibility that the Kalpoes did in fact just drop Joran and Natalee off somewhere.

Charges can still be brought and they can still be tried, just not being held in jail until trial.  At least I hope.

I have been saying for a while my cast of suspects keeps shrinking.  I can see this as totally a Joran and Paulus screw up of some sort.  Maybe they left Joran and Natalee at the Sloot compound and went home and so were not directly involved in whatever happened after that.

Don't shoot me, just thinking out loud.

I do hope Beth will talk with Mos tomorrow as planned.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on November 30, 2007, 05:14:08 PM
This case is closed..guys. Face it!  Evil wins again...there will be no justice for Natalee...ever. My heart can't take it anymore...I can't imagine what the family is feeling.  Hans Mos was playing us all and the Dutch will forever be linked to the unsolved disappearance of Natalee Holloway.  FOREVER!!!

Lala ... with all my heart I believe that evil will not prevail as long as our God is still on the throne.

I never did believe that justice would prevail for Natalee Holloway as long as the power was in hands of those within Abruba Law Enforcement ... Aruban Prosecutors Office and ... the Aruban Justice System ... as long as the outcome was in the hands of those who had personal and professional connections to Paulus van der Sloot.

However ... the road to justice for Natalee Holloway may not have been travelled and ... when it is ... the "powers that be" in the Dutch/Aruban administrations who were involved in this corrupt investigation will have wished they had done what was right in June, 2005 ... pursued justice for Natalee Holloway.

I am hoping for FBI intervention once the case is closed.  After all ... Natalee Holloway is an American citizen who went missing on Aruban soil and ... was denied justice by a corrupt investigation ... an investigation that was riddled with conflicts of interest.

Janet

++++++++++++++

Art Wood
'Rita Cosby Live & Direct'
December 1, 2005


ART WOOD, FORMER SECRET SERVICE AGENT: Absolutely. Absolutely. There's a lot that Americans can do through the State Department. I want to remind everybody that Natalee Holloway was a U.S. citizen. Once the Aruban authorities are done investigating this case, the FBI can still conduct an investigation.

 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: thirdstrike on November 30, 2007, 05:14:28 PM
I just read on Fox News.com that the K2's have been ordered released.  Is Joran far behind?

I guess maybe this was all a "desperate act" as was described by one of their attorney's... :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: cubbeegirl on November 30, 2007, 05:15:05 PM
I intend to keep the faith also... remember , Christmas is a time of miracles!!

Hey Cubbee,

Big hugs to you sweetie!!!


Right back at ya mishy!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Canary on November 30, 2007, 05:15:16 PM
Lazlo RU



The dossier that now exsists about the two suspects, according to the judge would have severe suspicions against them, but would be to less to hold them any longer.
"Based on these facts, the pre arrest therefor is not allowed acc. to Dop Kruimel. "That was about destroying evidence of a crime, and hiding the body" On these charges is to less punishment to apply pre arrest.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Anna on November 30, 2007, 05:16:46 PM
Yes, the FBI can still conduct an investigation but unfortunately they just can't do it in Aruba without permission being granted and we know that would never happen.

This is it as far as these perps being brought to justice.  Mos has just got to make it work.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Canary on November 30, 2007, 05:18:12 PM
I think was Lazlo is reporting is that hte evidence is only that K2 were not part of the original crime but of coverup and that has less punishment than voluntary manslaughter so they get out of jail because the crime sentence is less for what they did than what Joran did...if that makes any sense to anybody.  Pre trial detention is for more serious crimes with longer terms in jail


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: wreck on November 30, 2007, 05:18:49 PM
Lazlo RU



The dossier that now exsists about the two suspects, according to the judge would have severe suspicions against them, but would be to less to hold them any longer.
"Based on these facts, the pre arrest therefor is not allowed acc. to Dop Kruimel. "That was about destroying evidence of a crime, and hiding the body" On these charges is to less punishment to apply pre arrest.
That tells me a lot.
I think this the Dutch equivalent of "out on bail awaiting trial" on charges less severe than perhaps Joran.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on November 30, 2007, 05:19:31 PM
All along we have been advising the Kalpoes to talk and rat out Joran and now that this may have been what happened, we lose all hope.  The ballgame is not over.  We are in the 4th quarter, but let's wait.  I am hoping the reason the Kalpoes have been released is because they have spilled the beans and so has Freddy.


Boil it down and there are only two things happening here. Holland either has a brilliant strategy, or they are far dumber than we thought they were. If this is all part of a well planned prosecution they will be rewarded with accolades. If they are so stupid as to open themselves up to more failure, they will get more criticism than they ever imagined for putting on such a show. We shall see.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on November 30, 2007, 05:20:12 PM
Didn't Deepak's attorney claim the other night that he had not been "questioned" since LAST Friday????? Hmmmm -- strange. Maybe the Kalpoe arrest was soley to confuse/addle Joran. Just a thought..

I hope you are right, but I fear that is not the case.  Too much BS comes from Aruba and my hopes that a new invetigation would change all that are diminishing fast.  All I can think of is the level of disappointment Beth must feel right now.  I fear that this was never meant to hold anyone responsible, but possibly an attempt to make it appear that Aruba gave it their best shot....case closed. 

I hope Americans find somewhere else to vacation and Aruba can let Chavez take care of them from now on.  See how they like it when they can't support themselves without the tourist money and have to rely on a dictator for their pathetic survival.

And as for Renfroe....keep her sorry azz down there.  We don't want her and her diseases back here.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: thirdstrike on November 30, 2007, 05:21:09 PM
Yes, the FBI can still conduct an investigation but unfortunately they just can't do it in Aruba without permission being granted and we know that would never happen.

This is it as far as these perps being brought to justice.  Mos has just got to make it work.

.

I agree Anna.  Only problem is...based on this "new evidence" not being enough to hold the K2's any longer...I'd be willing to bet money the same thing will happen to Joran as well.  As much as that hurts to admit, I am now almost positive the person(s) responsible for Natalee's disappearance will go through this life at least not having to pay for their crimes... :sad:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Anna on November 30, 2007, 05:22:42 PM
I think was Lazlo is reporting is that hte evidence is only that K2 were not part of the original crime but of coverup and that has less punishment than voluntary manslaughter so they get out of jail because the crime sentence is less for what they did than what Joran did...if that makes any sense to anybody.  Pre trial detention is for more serious crimes with longer terms in jail


I think that's what she's saying, too, Canary.  Those are much lesser crimes and so they get to be out of jail until there is a trial.

But we should then see a very different result for Joran.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: snoopy on November 30, 2007, 05:22:52 PM
Lazlo RU



The dossier that now exsists about the two suspects, according to the judge would have severe suspicions against them, but would be to less to hold them any longer.
"Based on these facts, the pre arrest therefor is not allowed acc. to Dop Kruimel. "That was about destroying evidence of a crime, and hiding the body" On these charges is to less punishment to apply pre arrest.
That tells me a lot.
I think this the Dutch equivalent of "out on bail awaiting trial" on charges less severe than perhaps Joran.

That's what I'm thinking too wreck.  And Mos is not going to lay everything out on the table yet.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Canary on November 30, 2007, 05:23:14 PM
It is so hard to post on this site - it keeps telling me new replies and won't let my post go thru!!

Dop Kruimel says the Kalpoes werent detained for manslaughter, but for disposing of the body and for destroying leads in this case. These delicts dont justify the detaining of the brothers at this point.


THE CHARGE WAS DIFFERENT


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Sue on November 30, 2007, 05:23:51 PM


This Mos dude seems so fourth coming, I just cant imagine him
throwing himself to the wolves in this case


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Canary on November 30, 2007, 05:25:31 PM
Things are getting clearer to me:

They are after JVS

the K2 are only being charged with destruction of evidence

The tapes or whatever from Holland implicate Joran and not really the K2's IMO.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on November 30, 2007, 05:25:38 PM
by GWEN @ RU
2 Suspects to Be Freed in Holloway Case

Nov 30, 4:41 PM (ET)

ORANJESTAD, Aruba (AP) - Two brothers re-arrested last week as suspects in the disappearance of American teenager Natalee Holloway will be released from jail, a prosecutor said Friday.

The two brothers, Satish and Deepak Kalpoe, will be released by Saturday, prosecutor Dop Kruimel said.

"We have three days to launch an appeal, but we have to think about it," Kruimel said.

The prosecutor corrected a statement made earlier by Vinda de Sousa, an attorney for Dave Holloway, Natalee's father, who said they had already been released due to lack of evidence.

Their release will mark the third time that the brothers have been arrested and later released in the case. Both have denied having any role in her disappearance.

They and a third suspect who remains in jail, Joran van der Sloot, were the last known people to see Holloway alive before she vanished on May 30, 2005, hours before she was scheduled to return home to Alabama with fellow high school classmates celebrating their graduation. She was 18 at the time.

The three suspects were re-arrested on Nov. 21 on suspicion of involvement in Holloway's death. Authorities said they had "new incriminating evidence, but defense attorneys had complained that the new material amounted to little more than misunderstandings in the suspects' recorded conversations.

Van der Sloot's mother said Friday that she was happy for the Kalpoe brothers but did not whether the rulings mean anything for her son's case.

"I'm happy that something is happening," she said.


http://apnews.myway.com/article/20071130/D8T888001.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: cubbeegirl on November 30, 2007, 05:27:31 PM
Yes, the FBI can still conduct an investigation but unfortunately they just can't do it in Aruba without permission being granted and we know that would never happen.

This is it as far as these perps being brought to justice.  Mos has just got to make it work.

.

I agree Anna.  Only problem is...based on this "new evidence" not being enough to hold the K2's any longer...I'd be willing to bet money the same thing will happen to Joran as well.  As much as that hurts to admit, I am now almost positive the person(s) responsible for Natalee's disappearance will go through this life at least not having to pay for their crimes... :sad:



Well, if this has all just been a Aruba blowing smoke, I for one think that it is blatantly cruel to do this to Natalee's family, at any time, but most especially during the holidays....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Anna on November 30, 2007, 05:27:34 PM
It is so hard to post on this site - it keeps telling me new replies and won't let my post go thru!!

Dop Kruimel says the Kalpoes weren't detained for manslaughter, but for disposing of the body and for destroying leads in this case. These derelicts don't justify the detaining of the brothers at this point.


THE CHARGE WAS DIFFERENT


Makes perfect sense to me.  They left Joran somewhere with an alive Natalee and get a call sometime later that she is deceased.  They go back to help or are in the middle of assisting in hiding the remains the night when Beth arrives.  No wonder Paulus was sweating.  Bet he knew all about it as well.

All is not lost by far!  In fact, it may just be another step in tightening the noose around the neck of Joran, figuratively only of course.

I hope Beth will meet with Mos and get the low down on it all.  I continue to think they have Joran dead to rights on this.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: klaasend on November 30, 2007, 05:27:50 PM
It is so hard to post on this site - it keeps telling me new replies and won't let my post go thru!!

Dop Kruimel says the Kalpoes werent detained for manslaughter, but for disposing of the body and for destroying leads in this case. These delicts dont justify the detaining of the brothers at this point.


THE CHARGE WAS DIFFERENT

Canary - it was a setting in your profile, I just fixed it for you.  Should be better now.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Helen Back on November 30, 2007, 05:27:51 PM
Dana's show tonight should be a classic!

No doubt.  I'll be there!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on November 30, 2007, 05:28:09 PM
Lazlo RU



The dossier that now exsists about the two suspects, according to the judge would have severe suspicions against them, but would be to less to hold them any longer.
"Based on these facts, the pre arrest therefor is not allowed acc. to Dop Kruimel. "That was about destroying evidence of a crime, and hiding the body" On these charges is to less punishment to apply pre arrest.
That tells me a lot.
I think this the Dutch equivalent of "out on bail awaiting trial" on charges less severe than perhaps Joran.


Am looking forward to the complete wording on this ruling. It sounds damning in some ways. You're right Wreck, it does not appear they are off the hook.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on November 30, 2007, 05:28:41 PM
Lazlo RU



The dossier that now exsists about the two suspects, according to the judge would have severe suspicions against them, but would be to less to hold them any longer.
"Based on these facts, the pre arrest therefor is not allowed acc. to Dop Kruimel. "That was about destroying evidence of a crime, and hiding the body" On these charges is to less punishment to apply pre arrest.

I'm confused as to what this means....  I'm not comprehending, I guess..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on November 30, 2007, 05:28:49 PM
I think was Lazlo is reporting is that hte evidence is only that K2 were not part of the original crime but of coverup and that has less punishment than voluntary manslaughter so they get out of jail because the crime sentence is less for what they did than what Joran did...if that makes any sense to anybody.  Pre trial detention is for more serious crimes with longer terms in jail

Flashback to when Deepak and Satish were released in July, 2005  from custody ... while Joran's detention was extended.  The Kalpoes were rearrest at the end of August, 2005 ... new facts and evidence.  Nevetheless ... when all is said and done ... less than a week later ... in September, 2005 ... Joran, Deepak and Satish were all released without restrictions ... evidence was not sufficient and ... justice for Natalee Holloway did not prevail.

Why is there such a wide gulf between the prosecution's definition of evidence and ... the judges' definition of evidence?

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: klaasend on November 30, 2007, 05:29:34 PM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/NE121007.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Port Valerie on November 30, 2007, 05:30:18 PM
This is on the FoxNews site:

"The judge in the case told Van Susteren that supposed new and incriminating evidence presented by the prosecutor in the case "was neither new or incriminating," and that he was preparing to order the release of the brothers."

No way the judge spoke to Greta. Ridiculous.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Anna on November 30, 2007, 05:30:46 PM
Yes, the FBI can still conduct an investigation but unfortunately they just can't do it in Aruba without permission being granted and we know that would never happen.

This is it as far as these perps being brought to justice.  Mos has just got to make it work.

.

I agree Anna.  Only problem is...based on this "new evidence" not being enough to hold the K2's any longer...I'd be willing to bet money the same thing will happen to Joran as well.  As much as that hurts to admit, I am now almost positive the person(s) responsible for Natalee's disappearance will go through this life at least not having to pay for their crimes... :sad:

I don't have any money right now but OK, I'll just bet ya.  Joran is the one they are after in this as the one responsible for whatever happened to Natalee.  Drug dealers and body disposal are minor players.  It must have happened when Joran was alone with Natalee and the Kalpoes not present.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: wreck on November 30, 2007, 05:31:06 PM
It is so hard to post on this site - it keeps telling me new replies and won't let my post go thru!!

Dop Kruimel says the Kalpoes weren't detained for manslaughter, but for disposing of the body and for destroying leads in this case. These derelicts don't justify the detaining of the brothers at this point.


THE CHARGE WAS DIFFERENT


Makes perfect sense to me.  They left Joran somewhere with an alive Natalee and get a call sometime later that she is deceased.  They go back to help or are in the middle of assisting in hiding the remains the night when Beth arrives.  No wonder Paulus was sweating.  Bet he knew all about it as well.

All is not lost by far!  In fact, it may just be another step in tightening the noose around the neck of Joran, figuratively only of course.

I hope Beth will meet with Mos and get the low down on it all.  I continue to think they have Joran dead to rights on this.

.
I think you're right on Anna!!   :-|


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: klaasend on November 30, 2007, 05:32:43 PM
REMINDER

JOSSY WILL BE ON THE DANA PRETZER SHOW TONIGHT.  PLEASE POST ANY QUESTIONS YOU HAVE FOR JOSSY IN THIS THREAD AND I'LL FORWARD TO DANA PRIOR TO THE SHOW:

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2404.0


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: the big hammer on November 30, 2007, 05:34:16 PM
Kalpoe Charges

Canary writes: "Dop Kruimel says the Kalpoes werent detained for manslaughter, but for disposing of the body and for destroying leads in this case..."

Really?

That's not what the original news reports said.

This is starting to have that old Aruban 3 card monte feeling.  Where nobody can report or recite actual facts about actual factual happenings.

But if this is true, then it is sloot alone who is held for involuntary manslaughter and the Kalpoe's were essentially acessories after the fact.  This might be bad news for sloot.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: nonesuche on November 30, 2007, 05:35:04 PM
This is on the FoxNews site:

"The judge in the case told Van Susteren that supposed new and incriminating evidence presented by the prosecutor in the case "was neither new or incriminating," and that he was preparing to order the release of the brothers."

No way the judge spoke to Greta. Ridiculous.



I agree PV

I have to say that I don't like the idea of Beth being on Aruba or meeting with anyone without a bodyguard or JKelly at her side. Sorry, but I do not trust she is safe on that island. She's in my prayers for safety first, then heaven help her heart and what it's been through just today one more time.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Anna on November 30, 2007, 05:35:38 PM
REMINDER

JOSSY WILL BE ON THE DANA PRETZER SHOW TONIGHT.  PLEASE POST ANY QUESTIONS YOU HAVE FOR JOSSY IN THIS THREAD AND I'LL FORWARD TO DANA PRIOR TO THE SHOW:

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2404.0



OK, Klaas,

Jossy said duct tape and Joe T so here he goes!


(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Funny/2gx1ohe_th.png)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: klaasend on November 30, 2007, 05:35:41 PM
Posted by Lazlo at RU:

Quote from: Lazlo
From the AD:

Quote
Dossier
Het dossier dat nu over de twee verdachten bestaat, bevat volgens de rechter-commissaris ernstige verdenkingen tegen hen, maar zou te weinig om het lijf hebben om hen vast te houden.
,,Op basis van deze feiten is voorlopige hechtenis volgens hem niet toegelaten'', licht officier van justitie Dop Kruimel toe. ,,Daarbij ging het om het vernietigen van sporen van het misdrijf en het wegmaken van het lijk. Op deze delicten staat te weinig straf om voorarrest te mogen toepassen.''


The dossier that now exsists about the two suspects, according to the judge would have severe suspicions against them, but would be to less to hold them any longer.
"Based on these facts, the pre arrest therefor is not allowed acc. to Dop Kruimel. "That was about destroying evidence of a crime, and hiding the body" On these delicts there is to less punishment to be allowed to apply pre arrest.

Source: AD (link see other thread).

Sorry for typos, have to run!

http://www.ad.nl/binnenland/article1863776.ece?nscategory=topStoryA


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Buckeye on November 30, 2007, 05:36:20 PM
Kalpoe Charges

Canary writes: "Dop Kruimel says the Kalpoes werent detained for manslaughter, but for disposing of the body and for destroying leads in this case..."

Really?

That's not what the original news reports said.

This is starting to have that old Aruban 3 card monte feeling.  Where nobody can report or recite actual facts about actual factual happenings.

But if this is true, then it is sloot alone who is held for involuntary manslaughter and the Kalpoe's were essentially acessories after the fact.  This might be bad news for sloot.

.


Hans Mos gave a graphic description of charge and I believe it is Voluntary Manslaughter.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: cubbeegirl on November 30, 2007, 05:36:53 PM
Kalpoe Charges

Canary writes: "Dop Kruimel says the Kalpoes werent detained for manslaughter, but for disposing of the body and for destroying leads in this case..."

Really?

That's not what the original news reports said.

This is starting to have that old Aruban 3 card monte feeling.  Where nobody can report or recite actual facts about actual factual happenings.

But if this is true, then it is sloot alone who is held for involuntary manslaughter and the Kalpoe's were essentially acessories after the fact.  This might be bad news for sloot.

.



I hope it is bad news for ditch boy,,,


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on November 30, 2007, 05:37:31 PM
This is on the FoxNews site:

"The judge in the case told Van Susteren that supposed new and incriminating evidence presented by the prosecutor in the case "was neither new or incriminating," and that he was preparing to order the release of the brothers."

No way the judge spoke to Greta. Ridiculous.



I agree PV

I have to say that I don't like the idea of Beth being on Aruba or meeting with anyone without a bodyguard or JKelly at her side. Sorry, but I do not trust she is safe on that island. She's in my prayers for safety first, then heaven help her heart and what it's been through just today one more time.

I agree.  I think Beth needs to leave that island right now.  Let the prosecutor communicate through JQK. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Anna on November 30, 2007, 05:37:44 PM
Hammer,

No, not involuntary manslaughter but VOLUNTARY according to explicit details from Hans Mos in the Greta interview.

And he used graphic violent examples for this such as hitting a person on the head with an ax.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on November 30, 2007, 05:38:06 PM

Why is there such a wide gulf between the prosecution's definition of evidence and ... the judges' definition of evidence?

Janet


Because their justice system has no backbone?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: nonesuche on November 30, 2007, 05:39:04 PM
REMINDER

JOSSY WILL BE ON THE DANA PRETZER SHOW TONIGHT.  PLEASE POST ANY QUESTIONS YOU HAVE FOR JOSSY IN THIS THREAD AND I'LL FORWARD TO DANA PRIOR TO THE SHOW:

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2404.0



OK, Klaas,

Jossy said duct tape and Joe T so here he goes!


(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Funny/2gx1ohe_th.png)

I vote we tape him up head to toe like a mummy !!!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Anna on November 30, 2007, 05:39:36 PM
The judge said SEVERE SUSPICIONS against the Kalpoes.  It's just that their charges are so much less than Sloots.  For that reason they are being released pending charges and a trial.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on November 30, 2007, 05:40:53 PM
Up next on the Big Story - Fox,  Aruba update (probably the same).  Hopefully they have the presser soon.   Wonder if Greta's spoken to Beth again, she was s'posed to call her back in an hour.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: nonesuche on November 30, 2007, 05:42:06 PM
Don't you also wonder if Greta revealed to Beth "oh Renfro called me with the news" ?

Would she be that insensitive? I am beginning to think the answer is yes  :sad:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on November 30, 2007, 05:42:29 PM
On GretaBlog

FRIDAY UPDATE, 5:35pm - just spoke to John Q. Kelly….he is in Aruba with Natalee’s parents…it sounds like their meeting with the Chief Prosecutor will go forward…

Thank God!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: klaasend on November 30, 2007, 05:44:14 PM
Kalpoe Charges

Canary writes: "Dop Kruimel says the Kalpoes werent detained for manslaughter, but for disposing of the body and for destroying leads in this case..."

Really?

That's not what the original news reports said.

This is starting to have that old Aruban 3 card monte feeling.  Where nobody can report or recite actual facts about actual factual happenings.

But if this is true, then it is sloot alone who is held for involuntary manslaughter and the Kalpoe's were essentially acessories after the fact.  This might be bad news for sloot.

.


Correction Hammer - VOLUNTARY MANSLAUGHTER


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: snoopy on November 30, 2007, 05:44:36 PM
On GretaBlog

FRIDAY UPDATE, 5:35pm - just spoke to John Q. Kelly….he is in Aruba with Natalee’s parents…it sounds like their meeting with the Chief Prosecutor will go forward…

Thank God!

Yes! 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: wreck on November 30, 2007, 05:44:36 PM
I think what Mos was trying to do was to charge the Kalpoes as just as culpable as Joran for assisting in the body disposal and hiding evidence. The judge decided that their involvement did not rise to equal culpability as "Voluntary Manslaughter." All this means is that they will be only tried as accessories -- not manslaughter. (I think they SHOULD be held just as accountable -- but I can live with decision so long as Joran (and Paulus) are nailed to the wall)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: the big hammer on November 30, 2007, 05:45:52 PM
Voluntary, Not Involuntary

Right.  Thanks for correction.  I actually knew that.

And since Mos had provided details and explanations of the charges "against the suspects"  THEN he should have been just as clear in stating that these charges applied to sloot only.

Isn't this the first time anyone here or elsewhere is hearing the Kalpoe's were being held for "disposing of body" and "destroying evidence?"

So Kalpoes are held on crime of destroying evidence -- but have to be released because there isn't enough evidence to hold them longer? 

That's Aruban justice for you.

.

 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: snoopy on November 30, 2007, 05:48:05 PM
I think what Mos was trying to do was to charge the Kalpoes as just as culpable as Joran for assisting in the body disposal and hiding evidence. The judge decided that their involvement did not rise to equal culpability as "Voluntary Manslaughter." All this means is that they will be only tried as accessories -- not manslaughter. (I think they SHOULD be held just as accountable -- but I can live with decision so long as Joran (and Paulus) are nailed to the wall)

Yes and maybe by arresting all 3 of them with voluntary manslaughter charges was enough to make 2K tell all they knew. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on November 30, 2007, 05:48:20 PM
Ugh!!! Tito in the phone with FOX.  Can barely understand him.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: klaasend on November 30, 2007, 05:48:53 PM
Glad to hear JQK is in Aruba with Beth and Dave


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: wreck on November 30, 2007, 05:50:15 PM
Voluntary, Not Involuntary

Right.  Thanks for correction.  I actually knew that.

And since Mos had provided details and explanations of the charges "against the suspects"  THEN he should have been just as clear in stating that these charges applied to sloot only.

Isn't this the first time anyone here or elsewhere is hearing the Kalpoe's were being held for "disposing of body" and "destroying evidence?"

So Kalpoes are held on crime of destroying evidence -- but have to be released because there isn't enough evidence to hold them longer? 

That's Aruban justice for you.

.

 
I think Mos is only guilty of trying to over-prosecute the Kalpoes. (Again, I think the Kalpoes should be fried as well -- but I can see the Judge's point)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Spock on November 30, 2007, 05:50:42 PM
Lazlo at RU said it is because there is not enough evidence to hold them
Lazlo  PostPosted: Fri Nov 30, 2007 4:54 pm         

Probably mentioned already, but just in case, the Dutch media reports that the judge has ruled them to be released because he felt there was not enough evidence against Kalpoe brothers to hold them any longer.

Yes and this doesn't mean that there isn't more evidence.  MOS is holding more.  Much more.

Mos said he would drop the case in 30 days if it was not prosecutable. He didnt have enough to hold the Kalpoes in detention. He wouldnt be sandbagging if he was going to charge in 30 days. He would put up enough new evidence to hold them for charges. He did say this detention was a "last attempt" to get to the truth.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: nonesuche on November 30, 2007, 05:50:48 PM
Voluntary, Not Involuntary

Right.  Thanks for correction.  I actually knew that.

And since Mos had provided details and explanations of the charges "against the suspects"  THEN he should have been just as clear in stating that these charges applied to sloot only.

Isn't this the first time anyone here or elsewhere is hearing the Kalpoe's were being held for "disposing of body" and "destroying evidence?"

So Kalpoes are held on crime of destroying evidence -- but have to be released because there isn't enough evidence to hold them longer? 

That's Aruban justice for you.

.

 

well said Hammer, it's not as if Mos didn't have ample opportunity to state it all correctly in his interviews.

I'm so relieved to know JKelly is there also, thank you Dihannah, I hope he lets his knuckles show a bit for I'm unsure if anything less than that gets an ounce of truth out of Aruba.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: klaasend on November 30, 2007, 05:53:59 PM
REMINDER

JOSSY WILL BE ON THE DANA PRETZER SHOW TONIGHT.  PLEASE POST ANY QUESTIONS YOU HAVE FOR JOSSY IN THIS THREAD AND I'LL FORWARD TO DANA PRIOR TO THE SHOW:

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2404.0



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Observer on November 30, 2007, 05:54:40 PM
On GretaBlog

FRIDAY UPDATE, 5:35pm - just spoke to John Q. Kelly….he is in Aruba with Natalee’s parents…it sounds like their meeting with the Chief Prosecutor will go forward…

Thank God!



Yes! I think it's extremely important this meeting takes place for many reasons..It should be interesting what Mos tells them about the fine police work of Van Der Straaten and Jacobs and the rest of them that killed this case.

Since when do Murder and Kidnapping suspects get immunity from having there houses searched? Confessions that were retracted and blood that turned into chocolate? Paul Van Der Sloots best friend was the Police Chief are you kidding me?? BS!!  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Canary on November 30, 2007, 05:55:08 PM
Klass thanks for fixing my posting situation.

It has always been my belief that JVS did the deed and the Kalpoes were accessories so I am not too upset by this  YET!

The judge seems to be somehow agreeing that though there is serious evidence the Kalpoes were accessories after the fact, as we call it, this is not as serious a charge and therefore they don't need to stay in jail until and if convicted.  I remember reading these rules in Dutch law - that the pretrial detention or accusation detention was not as easy for a lesser crime. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on November 30, 2007, 05:56:51 PM
Ok...I have a frozen margarita in hand


something has been bothering me...Mos said he promised the k2's to close this by 12/31...that bothered me...

someone posted something today..copied from someplace...(no I am not drunk yet...just can't remember who posted it or from where)....deepak said to someone...tell the truth....cause his 8 days were over and he was walking out...HE KNEW he was being released.....

so..... have they been confront with what was learned from the 'new recordings' and did they confirm what ever and were promised to be set free if they gave evidence against the pervert killer???

I know I might be grasping at straws here...but I gotta go with the half of me that still believes


the 8 day remark was from 2005. It was only repeated on the boards today.

oh lordy...thanks...that has bothered me all aftrnoon


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tylergal on November 30, 2007, 05:57:45 PM
This is on the FoxNews site:

"The judge in the case told Van Susteren that supposed new and incriminating evidence presented by the prosecutor in the case "was neither new or incriminating," and that he was preparing to order the release of the brothers."

No way the judge spoke to Greta. Ridiculous.



I agree PV

I have to say that I don't like the idea of Beth being on Aruba or meeting with anyone without a bodyguard or JKelly at her side. Sorry, but I do not trust she is safe on that island. She's in my prayers for safety first, then heaven help her heart and what it's been through just today one more time.

I agree.  I think Beth needs to leave that island right now.  Let the prosecutor communicate through JQK. 

Beth may or may not have been surprised.  You know Julia Renfro and Greta are playing to the masses and trying to hype their suffering images.  Beth may have pretended to be surprised and not really at all. 

I doubt Beth will leave until she meets with Mos anymore than I would.  I would fight the devil and a circle saw if it was my child that had died in that pigsty and I wanted to bring it back home away from prostitute island. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on November 30, 2007, 05:57:52 PM
Ia m absolutely torn down the middle...part of me think this is just Bullcrap...well planned and executed....the have still wants to believe...so I am just gonna go get drunk!!

Poor me a couple!

di ....I have frozen margaritas.....a whole pitcher full!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: wreck on November 30, 2007, 05:58:12 PM
Voluntary, Not Involuntary

Right.  Thanks for correction.  I actually knew that.

And since Mos had provided details and explanations of the charges "against the suspects"  THEN he should have been just as clear in stating that these charges applied to sloot only.

Isn't this the first time anyone here or elsewhere is hearing the Kalpoe's were being held for "disposing of body" and "destroying evidence?"

So Kalpoes are held on crime of destroying evidence -- but have to be released because there isn't enough evidence to hold them longer? 

That's Aruban justice for you.

.

 

well said Hammer, it's not as if Mos didn't have ample opportunity to state it all correctly in his interviews.

I'm so relieved to know JKelly is there also, thank you Dihannah, I hope he lets his knuckles show a bit for I'm unsure if anything less than that gets an ounce of truth out of Aruba.

Once again people:

Mos did not lie to us. He TRIED to hold the Kalpoes to the same crime as Joran -- "Voluntary Manslaughter." The Kalpoes were not released for "lack of evidence." They were released because their involvement was not "Voluntary Manslaughter." The Kalpoes are not "off-the-hook"!!
This is probably why the Kalpoes were not released "immediately." They are still facing a trial. No one is "cleared" of wrongdoing.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Dana on November 30, 2007, 05:58:37 PM
On GretaBlog

FRIDAY UPDATE, 5:35pm - just spoke to John Q. Kelly….he is in Aruba with Natalee’s parents…it sounds like their meeting with the Chief Prosecutor will go forward…

Thank God!



Yes! I think it's extremely important this meeting takes place for many reasons..It should be interesting what Mos tells them about the fine police work of Van Der Straaten and Jacobs and the rest of them that killed this case.

Since when do Murder and Kidnapping suspects get immunity from having there houses searched? Confessions that were retracted and blood that turned into chocolate? BS!!

Jossy will be my 1st guest tonight, actually of of my guests will discuss the story.
I wont be catering to Joe Tacopina like other shows do.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on November 30, 2007, 06:01:18 PM
Ia m absolutely torn down the middle...part of me think this is just Bullcrap...well planned and executed....the have still wants to believe...so I am just gonna go get drunk!!

Poor me a couple!

di ....I have frozen margaritas.....a whole pitcher full!

Well pour me one, would ya?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: klaasend on November 30, 2007, 06:03:07 PM
DANA - be sure to check your email, I've been sending you the questions for Jossy.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on November 30, 2007, 06:03:31 PM
On GretaBlog

FRIDAY UPDATE, 5:35pm - just spoke to John Q. Kelly….he is in Aruba with Natalee’s parents…it sounds like their meeting with the Chief Prosecutor will go forward…

Thank God!



Yes! I think it's extremely important this meeting takes place for many reasons..It should be interesting what Mos tells them about the fine police work of Van Der Straaten and Jacobs and the rest of them that killed this case.

Since when do Murder and Kidnapping suspects get immunity from having there houses searched? Confessions that were retracted and blood that turned into chocolate? BS!!

Jossy will be my 1st guest tonight, actually of of my guests will discuss the story.
I wont be catering to Joe Tacopina like other shows do.

I'll be listening, Dana.  I hope Jossy can shed more light on what is really going on down there.  Thanks for what you do not just for Natalee, but for all the stories you cover.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on November 30, 2007, 06:03:50 PM
On GretaBlog

FRIDAY UPDATE, 5:35pm - just spoke to John Q. Kelly….he is in Aruba with Natalee’s parents…it sounds like their meeting with the Chief Prosecutor will go forward…

Thank God!

thank God is right!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on November 30, 2007, 06:05:49 PM
Ia m absolutely torn down the middle...part of me think this is just Bullcrap...well planned and executed....the have still wants to believe...so I am just gonna go get drunk!!

Poor me a couple!

di ....I have frozen margaritas.....a whole pitcher full!

Well pour me one, would ya?

well it's half a pitcher now...but I got a big one for you!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: klaasend on November 30, 2007, 06:06:12 PM
Posted by SMS at RU:

From cnn reporter:

Han Mos says it's a setback and a bit of a surprise that the judge decided to set them free.

Not enough to hold them for pre trial


Reading from the release of judges ruling:

New evidence together with existing evidence in this case file does produce serious grounds for the suspicion of some kind of aiding and abetting of covering up the traces of a crime committed or the disposing of a corpse. However it goes on to say that even the combination of either of those is not enough to keep these two suspects in pretrial detention any longer.



So Han MOs saying again it's a setback but he does have three days to lodge an appeal with the court of appeals here.
 
But that wont be enough to stand in the way of the release of these two suspects, the Kalpoe brothers tomorrow at 4pm.

Joran will be there until at least Dec. 7th

Reporters were told that the new evidence was the same for all three suspects. (my question - told by whom, the defense attorneys or the prosecutor?)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Blue Moon on November 30, 2007, 06:06:35 PM
Earlier this week someone posted that Julie RenHO said the Kalpoes would be released Friday.  How did she know that?  This explains Joe T. going down next week----HE knows baby Huey is GOING DOWN.  He cannot lay this on the Kalpoes cause Mos knows and Joe knows he knows.  How interesting.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Port Valerie on November 30, 2007, 06:06:37 PM
Fox changed its web site. No longer claiming that Greta spoke with the judge.  :roll:

This whole thing sounds like a fire drill in the cuckoo's nest. Fox is SO eager to get everybody out of jail.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: ldstlou on November 30, 2007, 06:06:47 PM
Ia m absolutely torn down the middle...part of me think this is just Bullcrap...well planned and executed....the have still wants to believe...so I am just gonna go get drunk!!

Poor me a couple!

di ....I have frozen margaritas.....a whole pitcher full!

Sunny...any wine? lol


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Observer on November 30, 2007, 06:08:16 PM

Jossy will be my 1st guest tonight, actually of of my guests will discuss the story.
I wont be catering to Joe Tacopina like other shows do.

Should be a big audience tonight Dana  :wink: ..No one is buying all the horrendous mistakes made early in this Investigation!! If they can't ever answer key questions about this then they better fix it before this goes to trial.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Spock on November 30, 2007, 06:08:31 PM

It has always been my belief that JVS did the deed and the Kalpoes were accessories so I am not too upset by this  YET!

The judge seems to be somehow agreeing that though there is serious evidence the Kalpoes were accessories after the fact, as we call it, this is not as serious a charge and therefore they don't need to stay in jail until and if convicted.  I remember reading these rules in Dutch law - that the pretrial detention or accusation detention was not as easy for a lesser crime. 

I seem to be missing some developments here:

1. Kalpoes suspected of "disposing of body" and "destroying evidence" and released?

2. Joran suspected of "voluntary manslaughter" and held?

3. The Judge said disposing of a body is not serious enough to merit detention?

4. What is the source of all of this or is this guessing?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Port Valerie on November 30, 2007, 06:08:33 PM
Gotta run. BBL.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Magnolia on November 30, 2007, 06:09:05 PM
ABC 33/40 Birmingham...just had a live report from Aruba.  They showed Beth getting off of the plane and she was alone, but a tall nice looking man met her.
No idea who he was.
They said that the Kalpoes have been released from jail but not from suspect status.
Interview with Figaroa(sp) He hardly speaks English.
He said that for this stage of the detention the evidence has to be a much higher level than before.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on November 30, 2007, 06:09:19 PM
 Oh me too Klaas. I just had a sigh of relief, but can still hardly think. The word cruelty is pounding in my brain...cruelty. :smt022  :smt009


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on November 30, 2007, 06:10:06 PM
Ia m absolutely torn down the middle...part of me think this is just Bullcrap...well planned and executed....the have still wants to believe...so I am just gonna go get drunk!!

Poor me a couple!

di ....I have frozen margaritas.....a whole pitcher full!

Well pour me one, would ya?

well it's half a pitcher now...but I got a big one for you!!

Thanks,  I'll start making our next pitcher right now.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on November 30, 2007, 06:10:20 PM
Ia m absolutely torn down the middle...part of me think this is just Bullcrap...well planned and executed....the have still wants to believe...so I am just gonna go get drunk!!

Poor me a couple!

di ....I have frozen margaritas.....a whole pitcher full!

Sunny...any wine? lol


Not a shot in hell darling!  LOL :shock: :shock:  just got the house painted ya know


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: ldstlou on November 30, 2007, 06:10:44 PM
Posted by SMS at RU:

From cnn reporter:

Han Mos says it's a setback and a bit of a surprise that the judge decided to set them free.

Not enough to hold them for pre trial


Reading from the release of judges ruling:

New evidence together with existing evidence in this case file does produce serious grounds for the suspicion of some kind of aiding and abetting of covering up the traces of a crime committed or the disposing of a corpse. However it goes on to say that even the combination of either of those is not enough to keep these two suspects in pretrial detention any longer.



So Han MOs saying again it's a setback but he does have three days to lodge an appeal with the court of appeals here.
 
But that wont be enough to stand in the way of the release of these two suspects, the Kalpoe brothers tomorrow at 4pm.

Joran will be there until at least Dec. 7th

Reporters were told that the new evidence was the same for all three suspects. (my question - told by whom, the defense attorneys or the prosecutor?)

If we have "aiding and abetting in the cover up of a crime and hiding of a body" then that means we have a crime and the hiding of a body...am I correct? So it says to me they have joran for a crime and hiding of a body!!! Lets hope!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: klaasend on November 30, 2007, 06:11:14 PM
Spock - please read back a couple of pages


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: ldstlou on November 30, 2007, 06:11:42 PM
Ia m absolutely torn down the middle...part of me think this is just Bullcrap...well planned and executed....the have still wants to believe...so I am just gonna go get drunk!!

Poor me a couple!

di ....I have frozen margaritas.....a whole pitcher full!

Sunny...any wine? lol


Not a shot in hell darling!  LOL :shock: :shock:  just got the house painted ya know

thanks for making me laugh!! I needed that!!! :smt052


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Scandi on November 30, 2007, 06:11:51 PM
On GretaBlog

FRIDAY UPDATE, 5:35pm - just spoke to John Q. Kelly….he is in Aruba with Natalee’s parents…it sounds like their meeting with the Chief Prosecutor will go forward…

Thank God!



Yes! I think it's extremely important this meeting takes place for many reasons..It should be interesting what Mos tells them about the fine police work of Van Der Straaten and Jacobs and the rest of them that killed this case.

Since when do Murder and Kidnapping suspects get immunity from having there houses searched? Confessions that were retracted and blood that turned into chocolate? BS!!

Jossy will be my 1st guest tonight, actually of of my guests will discuss the story.
I wont be catering to Joe Tacopina like other shows do.

Hi Dana and nice to meet you.  We'll be riveted to your show tonight. 

It is already 8pm in Aruba, so I doubt the presser with Mos will take place tonight.  I was hoping it would take place before Greta starts her show so I wouldn't have to mess with the volume to blank out Joe T.

I can just see your monkey dipping his beautiful tongue in a glass of frothy eggnog for Christmas (http://img512.imageshack.us/img512/6285/winksm6bq0jf.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Dana on November 30, 2007, 06:13:11 PM

Jossy will be my 1st guest tonight, actually of of my guests will discuss the story.
I wont be catering to Joe Tacopina like other shows do.

Should be a big audience tonight Dana  :wink: ..No one is buying all the horrendous mistakes made early in this Investigation!! If they can't ever answer key questions about this then they better fix it before this goes to trial.

I am declaring my show a Tacopina free zone, however I may have a comment or two about him.  :-)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on November 30, 2007, 06:15:15 PM
Earlier this week someone posted that Julie RenHO said the Kalpoes would be released Friday.  How did she know that?  This explains Joe T. going down next week----HE knows baby Huey is GOING DOWN.  He cannot lay this on the Kalpoes cause Mos knows and Joe knows he knows.  How interesting.


She did post that at RU...I forget what day. She was not just posting it as her opinion either. At least that's my opinion, lol.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on November 30, 2007, 06:15:20 PM
Ia m absolutely torn down the middle...part of me think this is just Bullcrap...well planned and executed....the have still wants to believe...so I am just gonna go get drunk!!

Poor me a couple!

di ....I have frozen margaritas.....a whole pitcher full!

Sunny...any wine? lol

Sunny, sounds good to me.  Better get another pitcher started!  :)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: ldstlou on November 30, 2007, 06:16:15 PM

Jossy will be my 1st guest tonight, actually of of my guests will discuss the story.
I wont be catering to Joe Tacopina like other shows do.

Should be a big audience tonight Dana  :wink: ..No one is buying all the horrendous mistakes made early in this Investigation!! If they can't ever answer key questions about this then they better fix it before this goes to trial.

I am declaring my show a Tacopina free zone, however I may have a comment or two about him.  :-)

going to try and download the video player thingy for your show so I can finally listen...see how highly technically advanced I am..lol...the video player thingamajig.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Elaine on November 30, 2007, 06:17:16 PM
Posted by SMS at RU:

From cnn reporter:

Han Mos says it's a setback and a bit of a surprise that the judge decided to set them free.

Not enough to hold them for pre trial


Reading from the release of judges ruling:

New evidence together with existing evidence in this case file does produce serious grounds for the suspicion of some kind of aiding and abetting of covering up the traces of a crime committed or the disposing of a corpse. However it goes on to say that even the combination of either of those is not enough to keep these two suspects in pretrial detention any longer.



So Han MOs saying again it's a setback but he does have three days to lodge an appeal with the court of appeals here.
 
But that wont be enough to stand in the way of the release of these two suspects, the Kalpoe brothers tomorrow at 4pm.

Joran will be there until at least Dec. 7th

Reporters were told that the new evidence was the same for all three suspects. (my question - told by whom, the defense attorneys or the prosecutor?)
Hello! I still think that Hans Mos may take them to a trial, they were released from detention in the jail..but remain suspects. Sounds to me like Hans Mos and the dutch know exactly what happened in this case, they just have to prove it. I am very glad that Joran remains behind bars. I have to keep faith that a trial is upcoming. Anything less, would really make them look like fools for drawing attention to this case again after two years.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on November 30, 2007, 06:18:25 PM
I need to get off for a few.  Have some things to do.  But will be back to catch up and watch Greta tonight!

Stay positive Monkeys!  The main suspect is still in jail!  Let's pray the k2's will be heading to protective services for spilling the beans!  ;)

Keep the faith, it ain't over yet!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on November 30, 2007, 06:19:53 PM
Voluntary, Not Involuntary

Right.  Thanks for correction.  I actually knew that.

And since Mos had provided details and explanations of the charges "against the suspects"  THEN he should have been just as clear in stating that these charges applied to sloot only.

Isn't this the first time anyone here or elsewhere is hearing the Kalpoe's were being held for "disposing of body" and "destroying evidence?"

So Kalpoes are held on crime of destroying evidence -- but have to be released because there isn't enough evidence to hold them longer? 

That's Aruban justice for you.

.

 

well said Hammer, it's not as if Mos didn't have ample opportunity to state it all correctly in his interviews.

I'm so relieved to know JKelly is there also, thank you Dihannah, I hope he lets his knuckles show a bit for I'm unsure if anything less than that gets an ounce of truth out of Aruba.

Once again people:

Mos did not lie to us. He TRIED to hold the Kalpoes to the same crime as Joran -- "Voluntary Manslaughter." The Kalpoes were not released for "lack of evidence." They were released because their involvement was not "Voluntary Manslaughter." The Kalpoes are not "off-the-hook"!!
This is probably why the Kalpoes were not released "immediately." They are still facing a trial. No one is "cleared" of wrongdoing.
I agree,I still have hope.I read somewhere that on aruba the prosecutor goes for the highest crime they can when they arrest suspects.Like if they would have arrested the Kalpoes for say rape then find out that they actually murdered,they couldn't up the charges to murder...something like that.
I am disappointed they were released but I still have hope(I have to)that this is part of Mos's strategy.Keep the faith Monkeys.
:)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Spock on November 30, 2007, 06:20:27 PM
Spock - please read back a couple of pages

Thanks Klaas, our posts hit about the same time. I understand the information comes from the Judges ruling. My question becomes how can disposal of a body not be a crime worthy of pretrial detention?

Also, if the Kalpoes involved themselves in disposal of a body, they had to of had a motive apart from helping their friend get off the hook.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: ldstlou on November 30, 2007, 06:21:05 PM

Jossy will be my 1st guest tonight, actually of of my guests will discuss the story.
I wont be catering to Joe Tacopina like other shows do.

Should be a big audience tonight Dana  :wink: ..No one is buying all the horrendous mistakes made early in this Investigation!! If they can't ever answer key questions about this then they better fix it before this goes to trial.

I am declaring my show a Tacopina free zone, however I may have a comment or two about him.  :-)

going to try and download the video player thingy for your show so I can finally listen...see how highly technically advanced I am..lol...the video player thingamajig.

ok...where did it go?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: klaasend on November 30, 2007, 06:22:27 PM
Need to switch over to a new cable modem I just got.  Have to log off, be back in a bit (hopefully  :lol:)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on November 30, 2007, 06:23:14 PM
(http://i143.photobucket.com/albums/r139/songluva/margaritaglass.jpg)   (http://i143.photobucket.com/albums/r139/songluva/margaritapitcher.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Observer on November 30, 2007, 06:23:46 PM
If anyone is having problems listening to Dana's Show just buzz me in the musings thread and I will help you!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Spock on November 30, 2007, 06:24:06 PM

Jossy will be my 1st guest tonight, actually of of my guests will discuss the story.
I wont be catering to Joe Tacopina like other shows do.

Should be a big audience tonight Dana  :wink: ..No one is buying all the horrendous mistakes made early in this Investigation!! If they can't ever answer key questions about this then they better fix it before this goes to trial.

I am declaring my show a Tacopina free zone, however I may have a comment or two about him.  :-)

going to try and download the video player thingy for your show so I can finally listen...see how highly technically advanced I am..lol...the video player thingamajig.

ok...where did it go?

Maybe Taco will call in  :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: dennisintn on November 30, 2007, 06:24:51 PM

I am declaring my show a Tacopina free zone, however I may have a comment or two about him.  :-)
[/quote]


dana, that's the best damn news i've heard today.
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: wreck on November 30, 2007, 06:25:51 PM
Spock - please read back a couple of pages

Thanks Klaas, our posts hit about the same time. I understand the information comes from the Judges ruling. My question becomes how can disposal of a body not be a crime worthy of pretrial detention?

Also, if the Kalpoes involved themselves in disposal of a body, they had to of had a motive apart from helping their friend get off the hook.

Spock,
I mentioned it several pages back --
I don't think the Dutch system allows people out "on bail." The kalpoes are essentially "out on bail awaiting trial." You can only be held in Detention for the most serious of charges.

.... that said, I DO think personally that "disposal of a body" is pretty damned serious and it SHOULD be a detainable offense pre-trial.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on November 30, 2007, 06:26:14 PM
Spock - please read back a couple of pages

Thanks Klaas, our posts hit about the same time. I understand the information comes from the Judges ruling. My question becomes how can disposal of a body not be a crime worthy of pretrial detention?

Also, if the Kalpoes involved themselves in disposal of a body, they had to of had a motive apart from helping their friend get off the hook.

We don't understand their system  :roll:

I will be tuning into Dana tonight. I will NOT be watching Greta. My bet says she will have Renfro and Joe T. blabbing crap. I can't go there tonight. It is too painful. They make me sick. You know Julia is just jumping up and down with joy right now...probably out slurping down a few with all her wasted friends.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on November 30, 2007, 06:28:56 PM
Spock - please read back a couple of pages

Thanks Klaas, our posts hit about the same time. I understand the information comes from the Judges ruling. My question becomes how can disposal of a body not be a crime worthy of pretrial detention?

Also, if the Kalpoes involved themselves in disposal of a body, they had to of had a motive apart from helping their friend get off the hook.
Spock,the only thing I can think of is that the Kalpoe's could not be held on the charges of voluntary manslaughter but....maybe they can be rearrested on the chages of body disposal and covering up a crime?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: sirensong on November 30, 2007, 06:29:42 PM
Anyone know who the judge was that released them?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tylergal on November 30, 2007, 06:30:05 PM
Posted by SMS at RU:

From cnn reporter:

Han Mos says it's a setback and a bit of a surprise that the judge decided to set them free.

Not enough to hold them for pre trial


Reading from the release of judges ruling:

New evidence together with existing evidence in this case file does produce serious grounds for the suspicion of some kind of aiding and abetting of covering up the traces of a crime committed or the disposing of a corpse. However it goes on to say that even the combination of either of those is not enough to keep these two suspects in pretrial detention any longer.



So Han MOs saying again it's a setback but he does have three days to lodge an appeal with the court of appeals here.
 
But that wont be enough to stand in the way of the release of these two suspects, the Kalpoe brothers tomorrow at 4pm.

Joran will be there until at least Dec. 7th

Reporters were told that the new evidence was the same for all three suspects. (my question - told by whom, the defense attorneys or the prosecutor?)

Evidence was same for all 3.  Could it be that all evidence showed that Joran was the guilty goat in all this?  In all 3 cases? 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Blue Moon on November 30, 2007, 06:30:25 PM
Remember Mos was always sly about answering if all the charges would be the same.  He kind of side stepped that by not really answering.  He would only say at the moment yes all would carry the same charge.  I think he knew what they would be charged with and only led everyone to believe he had them all on the same charge.  He said from the beginning he would not discuss the specifics of this case so I think he is very aware of what he is doing here.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tylergal on November 30, 2007, 06:30:51 PM

It has always been my belief that JVS did the deed and the Kalpoes were accessories so I am not too upset by this  YET!

The judge seems to be somehow agreeing that though there is serious evidence the Kalpoes were accessories after the fact, as we call it, this is not as serious a charge and therefore they don't need to stay in jail until and if convicted.  I remember reading these rules in Dutch law - that the pretrial detention or accusation detention was not as easy for a lesser crime. 

I seem to be missing some developments here:

1. Kalpoes suspected of "disposing of body" and "destroying evidence" and released?

2. Joran suspected of "voluntary manslaughter" and held?

3. The Judge said disposing of a body is not serious enough to merit detention?
Julia renfro.
4. What is the source of all of this or is this guessing?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Spock on November 30, 2007, 06:31:09 PM
Ther Kalpoes may be effectively "out on bail", but we dont have charges and we dont have a trial date. If they assisted in disposal of a body, they must have a motive, and that likely would be they did something to her they did not wish to have discovered. That should be enough to hold them another eight days.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: wreck on November 30, 2007, 06:31:33 PM
Posted by SMS at RU:

From cnn reporter:

Han Mos says it's a setback and a bit of a surprise that the judge decided to set them free.

Not enough to hold them for pre trial


Reading from the release of judges ruling:

New evidence together with existing evidence in this case file does produce serious grounds for the suspicion of some kind of aiding and abetting of covering up the traces of a crime committed or the disposing of a corpse. However it goes on to say that even the combination of either of those is not enough to keep these two suspects in pretrial detention any longer.



So Han MOs saying again it's a setback but he does have three days to lodge an appeal with the court of appeals here.
 
But that wont be enough to stand in the way of the release of these two suspects, the Kalpoe brothers tomorrow at 4pm.

Joran will be there until at least Dec. 7th

Reporters were told that the new evidence was the same for all three suspects. (my question - told by whom, the defense attorneys or the prosecutor?)

Evidence was same for all 3.  Could it be that all evidence showed that Joran was the guilty goat in all this?  In all 3 cases? 
That would be MY guess!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tylergal on November 30, 2007, 06:34:42 PM
Spock - please read back a couple of pages

Thanks Klaas, our posts hit about the same time. I understand the information comes from the Judges ruling. My question becomes how can disposal of a body not be a crime worthy of pretrial detention?

Also, if the Kalpoes involved themselves in disposal of a body, they had to of had a motive apart from helping their friend get off the hook.

Spock,
I mentioned it several pages back --
I don't think the Dutch system allows people out "on bail." The kalpoes are essentially "out on bail awaiting trial." You can only be held in Detention for the most serious of charges.

.... that said, I DO think personally that "disposal of a body" is pretty damned serious and it SHOULD be a detainable offense pre-trial.

"cannot hold on pretrial detention."  To me this sounds like a trial is forthcoming and they could be placed under arrest, depending on this trial and its findings.  Correct me if I am wrong, but I am just trying to understand their system.  I think I know, but that's beside the point. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: wreck on November 30, 2007, 06:37:18 PM
Quote
pretrial detention
[/b]

Key words here! This implies a trial IS coming -- they just can't be held behind bars UNTIL the trial.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Anna on November 30, 2007, 06:44:16 PM
Voluntary, Not Involuntary

Right.  Thanks for correction.  I actually knew that.

And since Mos had provided details and explanations of the charges "against the suspects"  THEN he should have been just as clear in stating that these charges applied to sloot only.

Isn't this the first time anyone here or elsewhere is hearing the Kalpoe's were being held for "disposing of body" and "destroying evidence?"

So Kalpoes are held on crime of destroying evidence -- but have to be released because there isn't enough evidence to hold them longer? 

That's Aruban justice for you.

.

 
I think Mos is only guilty of trying to over-prosecute the Kalpoes. (Again, I think the Kalpoes should be fried as well -- but I can see the Judge's point)


Reminder that no one has been charged as yet.

No, the Kalpoes were not released because there was not enough evidence to hold them but because the suspicions under which they are being held, not charges but suspicions only, are of a much lesser crime and not one that calls for being held without bond as we would put it in this country.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Observer on November 30, 2007, 06:44:41 PM

I am declaring my show a Tacopina free zone, however I may have a comment or two about him.  :-)


dana, that's the best damn news i've heard today.
dennisintn
[/quote]

Yes!! We can finally listen to a show without the scrooge  :cool:

Don't worry folks..The Evil doer's will not win!!  :lol:

http://www.scroogeyourself.com/?id=1123256495


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Peaches on November 30, 2007, 06:44:47 PM
Quote
pretrial detention
[/b]

Key words here! This implies a trial IS coming -- they just can't be held behind bars UNTIL the trial.

I like your line of thinking.

Wonder what the sporter thinks about his accomplices getting out of the pokey?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on November 30, 2007, 06:45:48 PM
Wasn't Mos suppose to give a statement around 4:30?? Did I miss it?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: ozziesmom on November 30, 2007, 06:46:06 PM
Spock - please read back a couple of pages

Thanks Klaas, our posts hit about the same time. I understand the information comes from the Judges ruling. My question becomes how can disposal of a body not be a crime worthy of pretrial detention?

Also, if the Kalpoes involved themselves in disposal of a body, they had to of had a motive apart from helping their friend get off the hook.

Spock,
I mentioned it several pages back --
I don't think the Dutch system allows people out "on bail." The kalpoes are essentially "out on bail awaiting trial." You can only be held in Detention for the most serious of charges.

.... that said, I DO think personally that "disposal of a body" is pretty damned serious and it SHOULD be a detainable offense pre-trial.

"cannot hold on pretrial detention."  To me this sounds like a trial is forthcoming and they could be placed under arrest, depending on this trial and its findings.  Correct me if I am wrong, but I am just trying to understand their system.  I think I know, but that's beside the point.    

Hi Monkeys, I'm disappointed by the release as welll ggrrrr, but Tyler seriously? They change it everyday? I don't think they have a "system" they make it up as they go along!

I'll keep praying for Natalee, and I hope Beth and Dave at least get some answers...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on November 30, 2007, 06:46:22 PM
Quote
pretrial detention
[/b]

Key words here! This implies a trial IS coming -- they just can't be held behind bars UNTIL the trial.

Well if that be the case would releasing them set up a situation for them to be either coached by the relatives of the prime suspect or threatened by them?

.....And I am still waiting for Van Der Straten to be held accountable for his actions during the first investigation.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Kiwi on November 30, 2007, 06:46:39 PM
There's kind of a bigger question. If the 2K's helped hide Natalee, why release them without having them show where she is! So if its a lessor crime in Aruba why not just till us the rest.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on November 30, 2007, 06:47:22 PM
Quote
pretrial detention
[/b]

Key words here! This implies a trial IS coming -- they just can't be held behind bars UNTIL the trial.

I like your line of thinking.

Wonder what the sporter thinks about his accomplices getting out of the pokey?


It is likely that we will be told that Joran doesn't know but we all know that would be BS, as well. You can bet your boots he knew a few minutes after it all went down.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on November 30, 2007, 06:47:58 PM
By the way Peaches, I hope you are feeling well today.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: WhiskeyGirl on November 30, 2007, 06:49:39 PM
Spock - please read back a couple of pages

Thanks Klaas, our posts hit about the same time. I understand the information comes from the Judges ruling. My question becomes how can disposal of a body not be a crime worthy of pretrial detention?

Also, if the Kalpoes involved themselves in disposal of a body, they had to of had a motive apart from helping their friend get off the hook.

Is it possible that in Aruba this happens on a regular basis?  Not something anyone would be concerned about?

One witness is no witness.  How many have disappeared before?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Peaches on November 30, 2007, 06:49:49 PM
By the way Peaches, I hope you are feeling well today.

I'm maintaining my position on the daisy side of the dirt, thank you for asking.

I think I need a nap now. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on November 30, 2007, 06:50:15 PM
There's kind of a bigger question. If the 2K's helped hide Natalee, why release them without having them show where she is! So if its a lessor crime in Aruba why not just till us the rest.


They can't...she was moved and they know it...they just don't know where.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on November 30, 2007, 06:50:50 PM
There's kind of a bigger question. If the 2K's helped hide Natalee, why release them without having them show where she is! So if its a lessor crime in Aruba why not just till us the rest.

I know what you mean.  I can only guess that they have not admitted to any of it and those crimes just aren't very serious to the Dutch judges.  Even if Mos can prove they id those things they still do not have to admit it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Observer on November 30, 2007, 06:51:24 PM
Latest from Greta

http://tinyurl.com/2uszbs


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on November 30, 2007, 06:52:12 PM
Anyone know who the judge was that released them?


I too want this info....do we know? Can we find out? Does Jossy know?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: klaasend on November 30, 2007, 06:53:20 PM
Posted on the front page of SM:

EURobert wote:

It’s possible that the Kalpoes didn’t take part in the - alledged - sexual abuse of Natalee Holloway but Joran might have “ordered’ them when things went wrong, to help dispose of the body because he KNEW things about them. Maybe he threatened them: “if I fall you will fall too! Remember in the Telegraaf-news-article it was said that the police thought that raping of drunk American girls probably happened many times before. Criminals have power over each-other because they know things of each-other! And maybe that’s the only reason why the Kalpoes untill now have kept their mouths shut about what happened.

And about the boat: I saw on the forum the question why the Dutch didn’t do a search themselves. I would guess that there are untill now to few strong clues where to search. Being familiar with the Dutch aproach I don’t think they would do searches in the wild, without strong and certain clues were the body is to be found.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on November 30, 2007, 06:53:43 PM
Anyone know who the judge was that released them?

Judge ASSBITE


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Maggie on November 30, 2007, 06:53:56 PM
I think they are all playing us...it's a scam that will bury this case.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on November 30, 2007, 06:55:32 PM
Posted by SMS at RU:

From cnn reporter:

Han Mos says it's a setback and a bit of a surprise that the judge decided to set them free.

Not enough to hold them for pre trial


Reading from the release of judges ruling:

New evidence together with existing evidence in this case file does produce serious grounds for the suspicion of some kind of aiding and abetting of covering up the traces of a crime committed or the disposing of a corpse. However it goes on to say that even the combination of either of those is not enough to keep these two suspects in pretrial detention any longer.



So Han MOs saying again it's a setback but he does have three days to lodge an appeal with the court of appeals here.
 
But that wont be enough to stand in the way of the release of these two suspects, the Kalpoe brothers tomorrow at 4pm.

Joran will be there until at least Dec. 7th

Reporters were told that the new evidence was the same for all three suspects. (my question - told by whom, the defense attorneys or the prosecutor?)

Evidence was same for all 3.  Could it be that all evidence showed that Joran was the guilty goat in all this?  In all 3 cases? 


Reading from the release of judges ruling:

New evidence together with existing evidence in this case file does produce serious grounds for the suspicion of some kind of aiding and abetting of covering up the traces of a crime committed or the disposing of a corpse. However it goes on to say that even the combination of either of those is not enough to keep these two suspects in pretrial detention any longer.


I am just amazed that this is not serious enough to keep them in detention..... :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: GabbyG on November 30, 2007, 06:58:34 PM
Things are getting clearer to me:

They are after JVS

the K2 are only being charged with destruction of evidence

The tapes or whatever from Holland implicate Joran and not really the K2's IMO.

I agree, they are after JVS/PVS. Arresting 2K could have been part of Mos's plan to scare the chit out of joran and paulus, wondering IF they would talk, WHAT they would say, etc. And to now release 2K is really gonna add fuel to Mos's fire I think. I bet this could have been part of his plan from the start, to arrest all 3, then let 2K go but not JVDS. Talk about sparks flying!! 
Plus I think it's possible that 2K have talked, have told the truth about all they know after being scared by their arrests. They might have actually listened when the interrogators talked to them about what they could get for NOT talking versus what they could get if they DID talk. These two are just country bumpkins for sure, but they have to be street smart from what we know about them. They have to have seen which way was the smartest to go. They may have bought themselves a lesser charge plus freedom until the trial. Time will tell of course but my faith is still in Mr. Mos.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on November 30, 2007, 06:58:39 PM
Penis Charadis 4 Joe T...I am sure he will spin all this in Joran's favor...puke that he is.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Kiwi on November 30, 2007, 07:00:15 PM
Well I'm going to open Kiwi's Dog House early now instead of waiting for the football games to  begin. Your all welcome but you have to bring your own!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on November 30, 2007, 07:03:10 PM
(http://i143.photobucket.com/albums/r139/songluva/margaritaglass.jpg)   (http://i143.photobucket.com/albums/r139/songluva/margaritapitcher.jpg)

looked good Truthseeker2! What kind of drink it's? Is it Pinocolade drink?

they are margaritas....I have a pitcher or two  :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on November 30, 2007, 07:03:19 PM
How did the prosecutor and ... 10 lawyers get it so wrong.  Maybe the judge that released the Kalpoe brothers has a different take on the definition of "sufficient evidence" than the prosecutor and ten lawyers.

There were no differences in the suspicions against the Kalpoes and Joran.  They all were held to the same accountability.

I can only assume if Deepak and Staish Kalpoe were released by a judge's rules ... Joran will receive the same ruling.

Janet

++++++++++++++++++++++

http://sendtofriend.abcnews.go.com/GMA/story?id=3912737

Hans Mos
ABC NEWS
November 26, 2007


Hans Mos, Aruba's chief prosecutor, told ABC News he believes the the new evidence makes the case against the three men stronger than it was two years.

"We are convinced if we had had this evidence we have now they would not have been released by the court at that time," Mos said.


http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,313168,00.html

Hans Mos
On the Record with Greta
November 27, 2007


GRETA VAN SUSTEREN, HOST: Breaking news from Aruba, Joran van der Sloot ordered to stay behind bars for at least eight more days. Now, the Kalpoe brothers already got the same news last week. Now, all three suspects were re-arrested. Why? The prosecutor has now charged all three with voluntary manslaughter of Natalee Holloway.  

MOS: And this decision to re-arrest these three suspects was a decision taken by 10 lawyers, by 10 lawyers sitting around a table (INAUDIBLE) whole afternoon, being presented the new material.  


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on November 30, 2007, 07:03:24 PM
(http://i143.photobucket.com/albums/r139/songluva/margaritaglass.jpg)   (http://i143.photobucket.com/albums/r139/songluva/margaritapitcher.jpg)

looked good Truthseeker2! What kind of drink it's? Is it Pinocolade drink?

Margaritas. Have one!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: klaasend on November 30, 2007, 07:03:54 PM
This was posted at RU:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/6ly4kyq.jpg)

What this appears to be saying is that the K2's most likely helped dispose of the body after the fact and did not kill Natalee.  That helping dispose of a body is not as bad as killing and their detention is not warrented.

This does not mean they won't be charged with a crime when it goes to trial, only a lesser crime than Joran.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: JusticeforNatalee on November 30, 2007, 07:06:11 PM
It's a setback but not the end.
Please remain hopeful.

Joran's still in jail.
Ship Persistence is enroute.
Kalpoes not off the hook.

And just in case Aruba is thinking of pulling another fast one and jerking
Natalee's family around again, here is a comment from Gretawire from someone
in Texas who is outraged about the K2 release:

"Dear Aruba-
I was never a fan of the “Ban Aruba” campaign. I have now switched sides. Thanks, Aruba. I will never visit you, ever."



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on November 30, 2007, 07:07:21 PM
Well I'm going to open Kiwi's Dog House early now instead of waiting for the football games to  begin. Your all welcome but you have to bring your own!

have margaritas, will travel...eerrrrr I hope it's warm where you are


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: igsigs on November 30, 2007, 07:09:11 PM
So -both- Kalpoes are likely to be charged with disposal of a corpse?

Sunday night...3am-ish?  Joran on comp at 3:30? Or Val?

Or monday.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: klaasend on November 30, 2007, 07:11:09 PM
REMINDER

JOSSY WILL BE ON THE DANA PRETZER SHOW TONIGHT.  PLEASE POST ANY QUESTIONS YOU HAVE FOR JOSSY IN THIS THREAD AND I'LL FORWARD TO DANA PRIOR TO THE SHOW:

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2404.0



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on November 30, 2007, 07:13:09 PM

Reading from the release of judges ruling:

New evidence together with existing evidence in this case file does produce serious grounds for the suspicion of some kind of aiding and abetting of covering up the traces of a crime committed or the disposing of a corpse. However it goes on to say that even the combination of either of those is not enough to keep these two suspects in pretrial detention any longer.


I am just amazed that this is not serious enough to keep them in detention..... :roll:



Joran's ruling next week will be very telling Sunny. If he is released we can probably chalk this whole Holland thing up to a bunch of bullshit. If he is detained, there may be something to the Kalpoes playing a lesser role and maybe even ratting him out.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tylergal on November 30, 2007, 07:13:14 PM
Spock - please read back a couple of pages

Thanks Klaas, our posts hit about the same time. I understand the information comes from the Judges ruling. My question becomes how can disposal of a body not be a crime worthy of pretrial detention?

Also, if the Kalpoes involved themselves in disposal of a body, they had to of had a motive apart from helping their friend get off the hook.

Spock,
I mentioned it several pages back --
I don't think the Dutch system allows people out "on bail." The kalpoes are essentially "out on bail awaiting trial." You can only be held in Detention for the most serious of charges.

.... that said, I DO think personally that "disposal of a body" is pretty damned serious and it SHOULD be a detainable offense pre-trial.

"cannot hold on pretrial detention."  To me this sounds like a trial is forthcoming and they could be placed under arrest, depending on this trial and its findings.  Correct me if I am wrong, but I am just trying to understand their system.  I think I know, but that's beside the point.   

Hi Monkeys, I'm disappointed by the release as welll ggrrrr, but Tyler seriously? They change it everyday? I don't think they have a "system" they make it up as they go along!

I'll keep praying for Natalee, and I hope Beth and Dave at least get some answers...

Well, I think it is sort of like when a doctor thinks your gallbladder is ruptured because he cannot visualize it on a CAT or a Cgram, and when he gets in there, he finds the gallbladder is eaten up with cancer and so is the liver, the heart and part of the lungs, and then he just does what he can to stop the bleeding sotaspeak. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: AZSunny on November 30, 2007, 07:13:46 PM
Things are getting clearer to me:

They are after JVS

the K2 are only being charged with destruction of evidence

The tapes or whatever from Holland implicate Joran and not really the K2's IMO.

Canary, I think and pray you are right!  I have not given up and the ship is on the way to help close this up! 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: WhiskeyGirl on November 30, 2007, 07:14:07 PM
Posted on the front page of SM:

EURobert wote:

It’s possible that the Kalpoes didn’t take part in the - alledged - sexual abuse of Natalee Holloway but Joran might have “ordered’ them when things went wrong, to help dispose of the body because he KNEW things about them. Maybe he threatened them: “if I fall you will fall too! Remember in the Telegraaf-news-article it was said that the police thought that raping of drunk American girls probably happened many times before. Criminals have power over each-other because they know things of each-other! And maybe that’s the only reason why the Kalpoes untill now have kept their mouths shut about what happened.

And about the boat: I saw on the forum the question why the Dutch didn’t do a search themselves. I would guess that there are untill now to few strong clues where to search. Being familiar with the Dutch aproach I don’t think they would do searches in the wild, without strong and certain clues were the body is to be found.

I wonder what if Dutch/Aruban law has a category of crime and penalties for those that have assisted other in concealing a crime?

Charged with rape, some form of murder, concealing a corpse, by association and participation?  Even if the participation was limited?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Kiwi on November 30, 2007, 07:15:57 PM
Well I'm going to open Kiwi's Dog House early now instead of waiting for the football games to  begin. Your all welcome but you have to bring your own!

have margaritas, will travel...eerrrrr I hope it's warm where you are
I'm in AZ, but its not too warm today. I'm watching Fox News in the Dog House, which is still saying that the defense lawyers said...... the usual


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on November 30, 2007, 07:16:13 PM
So -both- Kalpoes are likely to be charged with disposal of a corpse?

Sunday night...3am-ish?  Joran on comp at 3:30? Or Val?

Or monday.



Or Freddy or Paulus. Someone needs to inform Dickapina that that Joran isn't the only person in the world who knows how to cut a computer on. What a load of crap he is.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: sandy leiva on November 30, 2007, 07:16:52 PM
It's a setback but not the end.
Please remain hopeful.

Joran's still in jail.
Ship Persistence is enroute.
Kalpoes not off the hook.

And just in case Aruba is thinking of pulling another fast one and jerking
Natalee's family around again, here is a comment from Gretawire from someone
in Texas who is outraged about the K2 release:

"Dear Aruba-
I was never a fan of the “Ban Aruba” campaign. I have now switched sides. Thanks, Aruba. I will never visit you, ever."

well said these freaks of nature on that island hellhole and the judges need to know thier island will forever pay for the infamy now occuring. We will NOT FORGET OR FORGIVE until justice is shown for Natalee. that island can just implode on itself .




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: WhiskeyGirl on November 30, 2007, 07:17:33 PM
Here are some other thoughts ~

Does vacation booking/tourism spike after Aruba is in the news?

Example, do the recent arrests and their related news stories about Aruba change the perception of Aruba in the public mind?

Will the press 'drop' the story now that 2K have been released?

Leaving the public with the 'perception' that J2K are being held accountable for the disappearance of Natalee Holloway?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Magnolia on November 30, 2007, 07:19:27 PM
Birmingham ABC33/40 report....
Figaroa (Kalpoe Attoney)  said that the Kalpoes are still suspects
but the judge thought that the Kalpoes being free would not hinder the investigation.
They showed Beth with JQK.  (He looked great in jeans and windblown hair.)
They said that Dave has landed in Aruba and they will meet with Mos
tomorrow.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tylergal on November 30, 2007, 07:20:19 PM
Ther Kalpoes may be effectively "out on bail", but we dont have charges and we dont have a trial date. If they assisted in disposal of a body, they must have a motive, and that likely would be they did something to her they did not wish to have discovered. That should be enough to hold them another eight days.

Let's do a hypothetical.  You go out and kill Klaas.  You drove my car and then you called me and asked me and ask if I will ask Anna to get rid of the body.  In the meantime, I call Anna while my brother Bob, is gathering up body bags.  They could hold me and my brother  Joebob, but not for an extended period of time, because we were not a part to the original charge, but accessories after the fact.  What fact?  There has been no fact established in a court of law yet. Therefore, they will have to let me and my brother go and charge us as an accessory to whatever you are found guilty of  at such point you are tried and verdict render, whether it be wearing a wearing a plaid shirt or killing Klaas.  Then Anna, my brother and I will have to be tried for taking Klaas out to sea, if you are found guilty of killing Klaas.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on November 30, 2007, 07:21:40 PM
Posted on the front page of SM:

EURobert wote:

It’s possible that the Kalpoes didn’t take part in the - alledged - sexual abuse of Natalee Holloway but Joran might have “ordered’ them when things went wrong, to help dispose of the body because he KNEW things about them. Maybe he threatened them: “if I fall you will fall too! Remember in the Telegraaf-news-article it was said that the police thought that raping of drunk American girls probably happened many times before. Criminals have power over each-other because they know things of each-other! And maybe that’s the only reason why the Kalpoes untill now have kept their mouths shut about what happened.

And about the boat: I saw on the forum the question why the Dutch didn’t do a search themselves. I would guess that there are untill now to few strong clues where to search. Being familiar with the Dutch aproach I don’t think they would do searches in the wild, without strong and certain clues were the body is to be found.

I wonder what if Dutch/Aruban law has a category of crime and penalties for those that have assisted other in concealing a crime?

Charged with rape, some form of murder, concealing a corpse, by association and participation?  Even if the participation was limited?


They do have a charge called "abuse of a corpse" or something like that. They do have penalites for being an accessory to a crime. Good thoughts by Robert. It could be that Joran committed the murder but they helped in drugging and kidnapping her for him and felt impelled to assist in her temporary burial. Paulus being the legal beagle that he is told the Kalpoes if Joran went down they would go down with him.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on November 30, 2007, 07:22:49 PM
Ther Kalpoes may be effectively "out on bail", but we dont have charges and we dont have a trial date. If they assisted in disposal of a body, they must have a motive, and that likely would be they did something to her they did not wish to have discovered. That should be enough to hold them another eight days.

Let's do a hypothetical.  You go out and kill Klaas.  You drove my car and then you called me and asked me and ask if I will ask Anna to get rid of the body.  In the meantime, I call Anna while my brother Bob, is gathering up body bags.  They could hold me and my brother  Joebob, but not for an extended period of time, because we were not a part to the original charge, but accessories after the fact.  What fact?  There has been no fact established in a court of law yet. Therefore, they will have to let me and my brother go and charge us as an accessory to whatever you are found guilty of  at such point you are tried and verdict render, whether it be wearing a wearing a plaid shirt or killing Klaas.  Then Anna, my brother and I will have to be tried for taking Klaas out to sea, if you are found guilty of killing Klaas.

That sounds about right to me.  They would have to convict Joran first before they could try and convict anyone of helping him after the fact.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Buckeye on November 30, 2007, 07:23:17 PM
Birmingham ABC33/40 report....
Figaroa (Kalpoe Attoney)  said that the Kalpoes are still suspects
but the judge thought that the Kalpoes being free would not hinder the investigation.
They showed Beth with JQK.  (He looked great in jeans and windblown hair.)
They said that Dave has landed in Aruba and they will meet with Mos
tomorrow.


Thanks Magnolia

I have loved your Birmingham reports.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: klaasend on November 30, 2007, 07:23:19 PM
Birmingham ABC33/40 report....
Figaroa (Kalpoe Attoney)  said that the Kalpoes are still suspects
but the judge thought that the Kalpoes being free would not hinder the investigation
.
They showed Beth with JQK.  (He looked great in jeans and windblown hair.)
They said that Dave has landed in Aruba and they will meet with Mos
tomorrow.


Thanks Magnolia!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Observer on November 30, 2007, 07:23:27 PM

http://www.gratefulness.org/candles/candles.cfm?l=eng&gi=Nat's

November 29, 2007 Search for Natalee at sea

http://youtube.com/watch?v=XKxPAS5uXGg


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on November 30, 2007, 07:25:20 PM

Reading from the release of judges ruling:

New evidence together with existing evidence in this case file does produce serious grounds for the suspicion of some kind of aiding and abetting of covering up the traces of a crime committed or the disposing of a corpse.  However it goes on to say that even the combination of either of those is not enough to keep these two suspects in pretrial detention any longer.


+++++++++++++++

My understand of the judge's ruling that released Deepak and Satish Kalpoe:

The same suspicions were leveled against Joran, Deepak and Satish ... suspcions that dictated their apprehension.

I speculate that Joran will also be released ... no pretrial detention and ... the judge will cite the same reasons.

In other words ... if the case is brought to court ... Gerold Dompig's scenario comes into play ... the scenario which implies that Joran, Deepak and Satish acted alone and ... the only crime committed was the disposal of Natalee's remains.

Janet

++++++++++

Gerold Dompig
48 Hours Mystery
March 22, 2006


"We feel strongly that she probably went into shock or something happened to her system with all this alcohol maybe on top of that other drugs which either she took or they gave her and that she just collapsed," says Dompig.

The crime, Dompig suspects, occurred when the body was illegally disposed of.  The boys may have acted alone.

"We’re not talking about killers here," he says


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 30, 2007, 07:25:54 PM
Birmingham ABC33/40 report....
Figaroa (Kalpoe Attoney)  said that the Kalpoes are still suspects
but the judge thought that the Kalpoes being free would not hinder the investigation.
They showed Beth with JQK.  (He looked great in jeans and windblown hair.)
They said that Dave has landed in Aruba and they will meet with Mos
tomorrow.


Just to add...the reporter also said that Mos stated that he would ask the family to not talk about the case.  So far, this reporter, Ebony Hall, has been spot on with everything she has reported...seems that she has the ability to actually get to some of the truth...imagine that...a local Birmingham reporter.

Most of the reports can be found here...http://www.abc3340.com/
Tonights reports will not be available until tomorrow.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Kiwi on November 30, 2007, 07:26:45 PM
If destroying evidence and hiding a corpse are minimal offenses in the Aruban system, then rape doesn't warrant jail time. This kind of explains why you just don't have anyone reporting any crimes.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tylergal on November 30, 2007, 07:28:30 PM
Posted on the front page of SM:

EURobert wote:

It’s possible that the Kalpoes didn’t take part in the - alledged - sexual abuse of Natalee Holloway but Joran might have “ordered’ them when things went wrong, to help dispose of the body because he KNEW things about them. Maybe he threatened them: “if I fall you will fall too! Remember in the Telegraaf-news-article it was said that the police thought that raping of drunk American girls probably happened many times before. Criminals have power over each-other because they know things of each-other! And maybe that’s the only reason why the Kalpoes untill now have kept their mouths shut about what happened.

And about the boat: I saw on the forum the question why the Dutch didn’t do a search themselves. I would guess that there are untill now to few strong clues where to search. Being familiar with the Dutch aproach I don’t think they would do searches in the wild, without strong and certain clues were the body is to be found.

I wonder what if Dutch/Aruban law has a category of crime and penalties for those that have assisted other in concealing a crime?

Charged with rape, some form of murder, concealing a corpse, by association and participation?  Even if the participation was limited?


They do have a charge called "abuse of a corpse" or something like that. They do have penalites for being an accessory to a crime. Good thoughts by Robert. It could be that Joran committed the murder but they helped in drugging and kidnapping her for him and felt impelled to assist in her temporary burial.  :2doh:Paulus being the legal beagle that he is told the Kalpoes if Joran w :2doh: :2doh:ent down they would go down with him.

I think that's what me and Klaas and Wreck been screaming for hours. :2doh: :2doh: :2doh:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Anna on November 30, 2007, 07:28:47 PM
If Joran committed voluntary manslaughter on Natalee and the Kalpoes were not even present at the time, they cannot be held accountable for what he did.  Neither can they for his drugging her drink especially if they were not aware that he was doing so or it cannot be proven they were aware of it.

So if they in fact did drop Joran off somewhere, they would not be a party to what he did after that.  Then if he calls them up and asks for help and they give it, that is going to be a much lesser crime because they didn't kill anybody.

I have never heard of anybody in this country being held for abuse of a corpse without being allowed bail or maybe not even being detained in jail at all.  The law tends to take a rather light view of things after a person is already dead.

And yes, Tyler, that's just how it happened--er, I mean good example.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on November 30, 2007, 07:28:58 PM
Here are some other thoughts ~

Does vacation booking/tourism spike after Aruba is in the news?

Example, do the recent arrests and their related news stories about Aruba change the perception of Aruba in the public mind?

Will the press 'drop' the story now that 2K have been released?

Leaving the public with the 'perception' that J2K are being held accountable for the disappearance of Natalee Holloway?


It can't help tourism (see that post from gretawire from J4N above) at all. Somebody who was about to pull the trigger on a Caribbean vacation would tend to stay away from Aruba. The Prosecution lawyers weighed the ill effects of this action but decided to go with it anyway, much to the Arubans chagrin as all they want is for it to go away.

Personally I think they are in much deeper trouble if they don't prosecute the case.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tylergal on November 30, 2007, 07:30:12 PM
Birmingham ABC33/40 report....
Figaroa (Kalpoe Attoney)  said that the Kalpoes are still suspects
but the judge thought that the Kalpoes being free would not hinder the investigation.
They showed Beth with JQK.  (He looked great in jeans and windblown hair.)
They said that Dave has landed in Aruba and they will meet with Mos
tomorrow.


Just to add...the reporter also said that Mos stated that he would ask the family to not talk about the case.  So far, this reporter, Ebony Hall, has been spot on with everything she has reported...seems that she has the ability to actually get to some of the truth...imagine that...a local Birmingham reporter.

Most of the reports can be found here...http://www.abc3340.com/
Tonights reports will not be available until tomorrow.

She must not be wasting her time running after Taco and Renfro.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Observer on November 30, 2007, 07:30:26 PM
Fox update..Interview with Tito and new greaseball attorney representing Tacos  Law firm

http://youtube.com/watch?v=xT1e6ipPFlY


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Anna on November 30, 2007, 07:30:35 PM
Birmingham ABC33/40 report....
Figaroa (Kalpoe Attoney)  said that the Kalpoes are still suspects
but the judge thought that the Kalpoes being free would not hinder the investigation.
They showed Beth with JQK.  (He looked great in jeans and windblown hair.)
They said that Dave has landed in Aruba and they will meet with Mos
tomorrow.



And all we get to see is Joey T!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on November 30, 2007, 07:32:13 PM
If destroying evidence and hiding a corpse are minimal offenses in the Aruban system, then rape doesn't warrant jail time. This kind of explains why you just don't have anyone reporting any crimes.

If this is the case it may also explain why people may not want to go to Aruba.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on November 30, 2007, 07:32:35 PM
This was posted at RU:

What this appears to be saying is that the K2's most likely helped dispose of the body after the fact and did not kill Natalee.  That helping dispose of a body is not as bad as killing and their detention is not warrented.

This does not mean they won't be charged with a crime when it goes to trial, only a lesser crime than Joran.




The judge damn sure doesn't think she was wisked away on a MedJet.   :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: klaasend on November 30, 2007, 07:34:02 PM
This was posted at RU:

What this appears to be saying is that the K2's most likely helped dispose of the body after the fact and did not kill Natalee.  That helping dispose of a body is not as bad as killing and their detention is not warrented.

This does not mean they won't be charged with a crime when it goes to trial, only a lesser crime than Joran.




The judge damn sure doesn't think she was wisked away on a MedJet.   :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink:

Exactly!  They are guilty.  The judge is just saying they aren't as guilty as Joran. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Anna on November 30, 2007, 07:34:08 PM
Does it not strike anyone as telling that the judge says there are SERIOUS SUSPICIONS concerning the concealment of a crime and disposal of a body.

Would that not mean that there are also serious suspicions that there was a body to be disposed OF as well as someone who made that person into a body?

This is NOT something Julia and friends are likely to be happy about at all.  Not looking good for Sporter in my opinion.  Might as well say the judge said there are serious suspicions that Joran caused Natalee's death and then the Kalpoes helped him.

Now add to that the information about the boat in the NE article and it would seem the Kalpoes may not even be responsible for total body disposal but only assisting in it in some manner.  I doubt they drove the boat, etc.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on November 30, 2007, 07:35:05 PM
If destroying evidence and hiding a corpse are minimal offenses in the Aruban system, then rape doesn't warrant jail time. This kind of explains why you just don't have anyone reporting any crimes.

If this is the case it may also explain why people may not want to go to Aruba.


Amen to that. Some investigative reporter needs to dig into how many Dutch people have been prosecuted on that island. Bet it in all but non-existent.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: WhiskeyGirl on November 30, 2007, 07:35:29 PM
If destroying evidence and hiding a corpse are minimal offenses in the Aruban system, then rape doesn't warrant jail time. This kind of explains why you just don't have anyone reporting any crimes.

On one hand, dead people are not buying condos or timeshares.  Dead people are not going to be return visitors.  So, finding dead people may not be a good investment of of tourism dollars.  MO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: JusticeforNatalee on November 30, 2007, 07:36:03 PM
Magnolia, can you link that video or isn't it up yet?
My search was not successful.
TIA


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on November 30, 2007, 07:36:18 PM
Does it not strike anyone as telling that the judge says there are SERIOUS SUSPICIONS concerning the concealment of a crime and disposal of a body.

Was he sending a message?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: mishy on November 30, 2007, 07:36:42 PM
Here are some other thoughts ~

Does vacation booking/tourism spike after Aruba is in the news?

Example, do the recent arrests and their related news stories about Aruba change the perception of Aruba in the public mind?

Will the press 'drop' the story now that 2K have been released?

Leaving the public with the 'perception' that J2K are being held accountable for the disappearance of Natalee Holloway?


It can't help tourism (see that post from gretawire from J4N above) at all. Somebody who was about to pull the trigger on a Caribbean vacation would tend to stay away from Aruba. The Prosecution lawyers weighed the ill effects of this action but decided to go with it anyway, much to the Arubans chagrin as all they want is for it to go away.

Personally I think they are in much deeper trouble if they don't prosecute the case.


Hey Hiker!! :2waver: As usual, I agree with you...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: ldstlou on November 30, 2007, 07:37:45 PM
Does it not strike anyone as telling that the judge says there are SERIOUS SUSPICIONS concerning the concealment of a crime and disposal of a body.

Would that not mean that there are also serious suspicions that there was a body to be disposed OF as well as someone who made that person into a body?

This is NOT something Julia and friends are likely to be happy about at all.  Not looking good for Sporter in my opinion.  Might as well say the judge said there are serious suspicions that Joran caused Natalee's death and then the Kalpoes helped him.

Now add to that the information about the boat in the NE article and it would seem the Kalpoes may not even be responsible for total body disposal but only assisting in it in some manner.  I doubt they drove the boat, etc.



thanks Anna!! I posted that earlier!! If they are suspected of covering up crime and body, there has to be some proof there was a crime and body!!
What is next w/ Dr. Phil by the way??!! So if they only covered up the crime and body, does dr Phil have to pay them? :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Anna on November 30, 2007, 07:38:14 PM
This was posted at RU:

What this appears to be saying is that the K2's most likely helped dispose of the body after the fact and did not kill Natalee.  That helping dispose of a body is not as bad as killing and their detention is not warrented.

This does not mean they won't be charged with a crime when it goes to trial, only a lesser crime than Joran.




The judge damn sure doesn't think she was wisked away on a MedJet.   :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink:

Exactly!  They are guilty.  The judge is just saying they aren't as guilty as Joran. 

And there can't be serious suspicions about them if there are not also serious ones about Joran having killed Natalee.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on November 30, 2007, 07:38:55 PM
Fox update..Interview with Tito and new greaseball attorney representing Tacos  Law firm

http://youtube.com/watch?v=xT1e6ipPFlY


Tito performing his rare blend of Papiajivehonkingenglesio.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Anna on November 30, 2007, 07:39:57 PM
And the judge can't now release Joran after having said there were serious suspicions concerning the crime of voluntary manslaughter that he is suspected of.

It can't be serious against Kalpoes and not serious against Joran for we are talking basically the same evidence, are we not?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Pita on November 30, 2007, 07:39:59 PM
Judge who released Kalpoes today.

(http://i103.photobucket.com/albums/m153/CMPM/judge.jpg)

The judge in the case of the disappearance of American teenager Natalee Holloway, whose identity was not released by the government, leaves the San Nicolaas police station in Aruba, Friday, Nov. 30, 2007. The two brothers re-arrested last week as suspects, Satish and Deepak Kalpoe, will be released after the judge did not find 'serious grounds' for suspicion of their involvement in a crime, according to a statement from the prosecutor's office Friday. (AP Photo/Pedro Famous Diaz)

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071130/ap_on_re_la_am_ca/aruba_missing_teen;_ylt=Av9lm4Civ4tXydAjWilQ9zRvaA8F




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on November 30, 2007, 07:40:04 PM
This was posted at RU:

What this appears to be saying is that the K2's most likely helped dispose of the body after the fact and did not kill Natalee.  That helping dispose of a body is not as bad as killing and their detention is not warrented.

This does not mean they won't be charged with a crime when it goes to trial, only a lesser crime than Joran.




The judge damn sure doesn't think she was wisked away on a MedJet.   :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink:

Exactly!  They are guilty.  The judge is just saying they aren't as guilty as Joran. 

And there can't be serious suspicions about them if there are not also serious ones about Joran having killed Natalee.




Got to have a body to hide a body.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: kathyn2 on November 30, 2007, 07:40:33 PM
I think this has been part of the problem.   The Aruban authorities always telling the Dave and Beth to keep their mouths shut.  Maybe its time they spoke out and told all they know.  All this secretive stuff is for the birds and I think leads to no good.

[/quote]

Just to add...the reporter also said that Mos stated that he would ask the family to not talk about the case.  So far, this reporter, Ebony Hall, has been spot on with everything she has reported...seems that she has the ability to actually get to some of the truth...imagine that...a local Birmingham reporter.

Most of the reports can be found here...http://www.abc3340.com/
Tonights reports will not be available until tomorrow.
[/quote]


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on November 30, 2007, 07:41:12 PM
Judge who released Kalpoes today.

(http://i103.photobucket.com/albums/m153/CMPM/judge.jpg)



Slinking out playing a game of pocket pool.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on November 30, 2007, 07:41:40 PM
Judge who released Kalpoes today.

(http://i103.photobucket.com/albums/m153/CMPM/judge.jpg)

The judge in the case of the disappearance of American teenager Natalee Holloway, whose identity was not released by the government, leaves the San Nicolaas police station in Aruba, Friday, Nov. 30, 2007. The two brothers re-arrested last week as suspects, Satish and Deepak Kalpoe, will be released after the judge did not find 'serious grounds' for suspicion of their involvement in a crime, according to a statement from the prosecutor's office Friday. (AP Photo/Pedro Famous Diaz)

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071130/ap_on_re_la_am_ca/aruba_missing_teen;_ylt=Av9lm4Civ4tXydAjWilQ9zRvaA8F




Thank you Pita.

Does anybody know the name of the judge?

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on November 30, 2007, 07:43:17 PM

Hey Hiker!! :2waver: As usual, I agree with you...


Hi Miss Mish! As they say in England, "Back at you." :2waver: :2waver: :2waver:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Observer on November 30, 2007, 07:43:40 PM
(http://img256.imageshack.us/img256/9131/hansyc2.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)

Video
http://tinyurl.com/2287fj
Brothers to be freed in Natalee Holloway case

ORANJESTAD, Aruba (CNN) -- Two of the suspects being held in connection with Natalee Holloway's presumed death will be released from custody by Saturday.

Prosecutors wanted Deepak and Satish Kalpoe held in Aruba for another eight days, but a judge rejected their request Friday.

The decision was "a bit of a setback," said Hans Mos, Aruba's chief public prosecutor. But it does not change his plan to decide by the end of the year whether to prosecute anyone in the Holloway case.

"We had hoped for a longer period to confront these suspects with the material we have against them, but this is the way the law says it must go," Mos said.

Holloway's parents are expected to meet with Mos on Saturday. The prosecutor said he will explain to them what happened, "if I can explain it. I hope I can."

Deepak Kalpoe's defense attorney, meanwhile, said his client is "really happy to recover his freedom after 10 days in jail."

Prosecutors have three days to appeal the decision and will decide Monday whether or not to do so.

A third man, Joran van der Sloot, is still being held in the case. Van der Sloot is set to appear before a judge December 7, and prosecutors have said they are considering requesting that he be detained another 60 days.

The Kalpoe brothers were previously jailed in the case, but were rearrested last week and charged with being involved in the "voluntary manslaughter" of Holloway.

The judge reasoned Friday that "the new evidence, together with the existing evidence in this case, produce serious grounds for the suspicion of some kind of aiding and abetting, of covering up the traces of a crime committed or of the disposing of a corpse," prosecutors said.

But people accused of those crimes do not qualify for pretrial detention under Aruban law, Mos told reporters. He noted that on Monday, the same judge approved van der Sloot's continuing detention based on the same evidence.

"Apparently, the judge sees a difference between the third suspect and these two suspects," Mos said, since the judge concluded the evidence against the Kalpoes was not strong enough to warrant their continued detention.

When the arrests took place November 21, prosecutors said they had new incriminating evidence against the three men.

They were the last people seen with Holloway, 18, as she left an Oranjestad nightclub on May 30, 2005. She was on a trip to Aruba with about 100 classmates celebrating their graduation from Mountain Brook High School in suburban Birmingham, Alabama.

Holloway has been missing since. Van der Sloot and the Kalpoes have maintained their innocence in her disappearance.

The Kalpoes have told police they dropped Holloway and van der Sloot off near a lighthouse on the northern tip of the island after they left the nightclub. Van der Sloot's mother, Anita, has said her son told her he was on the beach with Holloway but left her there because she wanted to stay.

Mos has told CNN he believes authorities have enough evidence to prove Holloway is dead, even if her body is never found. He has suggested her death was an accident.

The new evidence against the three men was gathered from advanced techniques used to re-examine existing information, including cell phone records and text messages exchanged the night Holloway disappeared, Mos has said.

Investigators also returned to the homes of the suspects to try to re-create transmissions. The team also discovered that some existing evidence was improperly analyzed.

Defense attorneys for the Kalpoes and van der Sloot have said the prosecutors' evidence is flimsy. "To say it's less than nothing is too much," van der Sloot's lawyer, Ariean de Bie, told CNN.

In Aruba, authorities can make an arrest if they have reasonable suspicion that someone knows about or is involved in a crime. Magistrates investigate cases, and judges determine a suspect's guilt or innocence. There are no jury trials.

http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/americas/11/30/aruba.holloway/index.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: ldstlou on November 30, 2007, 07:44:06 PM
Judge who released Kalpoes today.

(http://i103.photobucket.com/albums/m153/CMPM/judge.jpg)

The judge in the case of the disappearance of American teenager Natalee Holloway, whose identity was not released by the government, leaves the San Nicolaas police station in Aruba, Friday, Nov. 30, 2007. The two brothers re-arrested last week as suspects, Satish and Deepak Kalpoe, will be released after the judge did not find 'serious grounds' for suspicion of their involvement in a crime, according to a statement from the prosecutor's office Friday.  (AP Photo/Pedro Famous Diaz)

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071130/ap_on_re_la_am_ca/aruba_missing_teen;_ylt=Av9lm4Civ4tXydAjWilQ9zRvaA8F




Thank you Pita.

Does anybody know the name of the judge?

Janet

That is NOT what the office stated!! They said serious suspicion of hiding a crime and natalee's body!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tylergal on November 30, 2007, 07:44:31 PM
I wonder if Clyde Beatty is reading his Bible tonight, playing cards, smoking dope or having a fun time with Bubba, his bunk bud.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: AZSunny on November 30, 2007, 07:45:33 PM
Fox changed its web site. No longer claiming that Greta spoke with the judge.  :roll:

This whole thing sounds like a fire drill in the cuckoo's nest. Fox is SO eager to get everybody out of jail.

I completely disagree with this statement.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on November 30, 2007, 07:45:37 PM
Judge who released Kalpoes today.

(http://i103.photobucket.com/albums/m153/CMPM/judge.jpg)


Is it just me or does this guy look like he belongs in Baggage Claims?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tylergal on November 30, 2007, 07:45:55 PM
Crap, I meant Clyde Barrow (duh, Warren Beatty was Clyde Barrow, right?) :lol: :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: kathyn2 on November 30, 2007, 07:46:45 PM
Come on!  Thats ridiculous.  Mos hoped to have more time to confront them??????   Well he has not talked to them in a whole week since they've been there.  I heard no one has talked to them since last Friday.   Why didn't they make good use of the time they did have for goodness sakes!  What a bunch of baloney.  I don't know why some of you guys have such faith in this Mos person???


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: ldstlou on November 30, 2007, 07:51:12 PM
The Kalpoe brothers were previously jailed in the case, but were rearrested last week and charged with being involved in the "voluntary manslaughter" of Holloway.

The judge reasoned Friday that "the new evidence, together with the existing evidence in this case, produce serious grounds for the suspicion of some kind of aiding and abetting, of covering up the traces of a crime committed or of the disposing of a corpse," prosecutors said. Sounds like the judge is saying there WAS a crime

But people accused of those crimes do not qualify for pretrial detention under Aruban law, Mos told reporters. He noted that on Monday, the same judge approved van der Sloot's continuing detention based on the same evidence. I think this is a good sign!! More evidence against joran?
"Apparently, the judge sees a difference between the third suspect and these two suspects," Mos said, since the judge concluded the evidence against the Kalpoes was not strong enough to warrant their continued detention. I think the judge is saying there is a crime of voluntary manslaughter against Natalee...joran committed it, k2 helped cover it up. I think this is the same conclusion alot of us had too.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: klaasend on November 30, 2007, 07:51:49 PM
Come on!  Thats ridiculous.  Mos hoped to have more time to confront them??????   Well he has not talked to them in a whole week since they've been there.  I heard no one has talked to them since last Friday.   Why didn't they make good use of the time they did have for goodness sakes!  What a bunch of baloney.  I don't know why some of you guys have such faith in this Mos person???

Why do you continue to believe everything the defense attorneys say?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Pita on November 30, 2007, 07:52:12 PM
Judge who released Kalpoes today.

(http://i103.photobucket.com/albums/m153/CMPM/judge.jpg)

The judge in the case of the disappearance of American teenager Natalee Holloway, whose identity was not released by the government, leaves the San Nicolaas police station in Aruba, Friday, Nov. 30, 2007. The two brothers re-arrested last week as suspects, Satish and Deepak Kalpoe, will be released after the judge did not find 'serious grounds' for suspicion of their involvement in a crime, according to a statement from the prosecutor's office Friday. (AP Photo/Pedro Famous Diaz)

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071130/ap_on_re_la_am_ca/aruba_missing_teen;_ylt=Av9lm4Civ4tXydAjWilQ9zRvaA8F




Thank you Pita.

Does anybody know the name of the judge?

Janet

Maybe Dana can ask Jossy tonight on his show??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Maria on November 30, 2007, 07:53:31 PM

I am declaring my show a Tacopina free zone, however I may have a comment or two about him.  :-)


dana, that's the best damn news i've heard today.
dennisintn
[/quote]

Me too.  I can't stand watching the idiot(Taco).  I actually get sick. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on November 30, 2007, 07:54:24 PM
The Kalpoe brothers were previously jailed in the case, but were rearrested last week and charged with being involved in the "voluntary manslaughter" of Holloway.

The judge reasoned Friday that "the new evidence, together with the existing evidence in this case, produce serious grounds for the suspicion of some kind of aiding and abetting, of covering up the traces of a crime committed or of the disposing of a corpse," prosecutors said. Sounds like the judge is saying there WAS a crime

But people accused of those crimes do not qualify for pretrial detention under Aruban law, Mos told reporters. He noted that on Monday, the same judge approved van der Sloot's continuing detention based on the same evidence. I think this is a good sign!! More evidence against joran?
"Apparently, the judge sees a difference between the third suspect and these two suspects," Mos said, since the judge concluded the evidence against the Kalpoes was not strong enough to warrant their continued detention. I think the judge is saying there is a crime of voluntary manslaughter against Natalee...joran committed it, k2 helped cover it up. I think this is the same conclusion alot of us had too.


We'll see what happens on December 7. Joran's Christmas vacation is on the line. They may have a silly law for that like the Santa Claus Rule.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tylergal on November 30, 2007, 07:57:21 PM
I was watching a talk show one night about 2 months ago and authorities including CIA/FBI agent and a couple pathologists, etc., were discussing murder and the resolution rate in the USA.  They said it was about 50% whereas before the 1960s it was about 90%.  Why do you think that is?  We, the people, want to know more than we are entitled to know but we scream freedom of press, and by doing so, police and prosecutors often have to give us so much detail that it gives the perps information they are able to use in eluding conviction.  So maybe we are demanding too much here while Mos is trying to keep some information close to the vest.  I think we will know more by JQKs expression if we are fortunate to have him on TV this weekend.  Maybe that is who is going to be on KGs' program Saturday night, our big surprise, or is it Beth or Dave in an exclusive?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Observer on November 30, 2007, 07:57:49 PM
(http://img256.imageshack.us/img256/9131/hansyc2.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)

Video
http://tinyurl.com/2287fj

Hans Mos Press conference if you missed the link above.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Anna on November 30, 2007, 07:58:03 PM
Hiker,
I don't think Sinter Klaus will be coming to see Joran.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Katysmom on November 30, 2007, 07:59:48 PM
Judge who released Kalpoes today.

(http://i103.photobucket.com/albums/m153/CMPM/judge.jpg)

The judge in the case of the disappearance of American teenager Natalee Holloway, whose identity was not released by the government, leaves the San Nicolaas police station in Aruba, Friday, Nov. 30, 2007. The two brothers re-arrested last week as suspects, Satish and Deepak Kalpoe, will be released after the judge did not find 'serious grounds' for suspicion of their involvement in a crime, according to a statement from the prosecutor's office Friday. (AP Photo/Pedro Famous Diaz)

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071130/ap_on_re_la_am_ca/aruba_missing_teen;_ylt=Av9lm4Civ4tXydAjWilQ9zRvaA8F




Thank you Pita.

Does anybody know the name of the judge?

Janet

If this picture is of the judge walking out of the police station, why does it say "drinks" on the door?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: ldstlou on November 30, 2007, 08:00:14 PM
The Kalpoe brothers were previously jailed in the case, but were rearrested last week and charged with being involved in the "voluntary manslaughter" of Holloway.

The judge reasoned Friday that "the new evidence, together with the existing evidence in this case, produce serious grounds for the suspicion of some kind of aiding and abetting, of covering up the traces of a crime committed or of the disposing of a corpse," prosecutors said. Sounds like the judge is saying there WAS a crime

But people accused of those crimes do not qualify for pretrial detention under Aruban law, Mos told reporters. He noted that on Monday, the same judge approved van der Sloot's continuing detention based on the same evidence. I think this is a good sign!! More evidence against joran?
"Apparently, the judge sees a difference between the third suspect and these two suspects," Mos said, since the judge concluded the evidence against the Kalpoes was not strong enough to warrant their continued detention. I think the judge is saying there is a crime of voluntary manslaughter against Natalee...joran committed it, k2 helped cover it up. I think this is the same conclusion alot of us had too.


We'll see what happens on December 7. Joran's Christmas vacation is on the line. They may have a silly law for that like the Santa Claus Rule.

I wish I could laugh at that but it may just be true!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on November 30, 2007, 08:01:06 PM
Hiker,
I don't think Sinter Klaus will be coming to see Joran.

 :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: If he did he'd probably tell him to read his Bible instead of using it for a doorstop.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: ldstlou on November 30, 2007, 08:01:44 PM
Judge who released Kalpoes today.

(http://i103.photobucket.com/albums/m153/CMPM/judge.jpg)

The judge in the case of the disappearance of American teenager Natalee Holloway, whose identity was not released by the government, leaves the San Nicolaas police station in Aruba, Friday, Nov. 30, 2007. The two brothers re-arrested last week as suspects, Satish and Deepak Kalpoe, will be released after the judge did not find 'serious grounds' for suspicion of their involvement in a crime, according to a statement from the prosecutor's office Friday. (AP Photo/Pedro Famous Diaz)

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071130/ap_on_re_la_am_ca/aruba_missing_teen;_ylt=Av9lm4Civ4tXydAjWilQ9zRvaA8F




Thank you Pita.

Does anybody know the name of the judge?

Janet

If this picture is of the judge walking out of the police station, why does it say "drinks" on the door?

Holy crap Katy, good eye!!! I missed that!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on November 30, 2007, 08:02:30 PM

We'll see what happens on December 7. Joran's Christmas vacation is on the line. They may have a silly law for that like the Santa Claus Rule.

I wish I could laugh at that but it may just be true!!


You never know with these clowns.  :wink: :wink: :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on November 30, 2007, 08:03:11 PM
Glenda/Julia is having a good laugh over Beth at RU...she really needs to be thrown down and stomped on...sickening slut.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Observer on November 30, 2007, 08:03:12 PM
Hiker,
I don't think Sinter Klaus will be coming to see Joran.

When the Dutch People have been bad SinterKlaas sends them to Spain..Weird Huh? I still have plenty of hope that Joran and everyone else that is involved will be sent to hell.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Frank on November 30, 2007, 08:03:40 PM
It's a vending machine


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Blue Moon on November 30, 2007, 08:05:14 PM
Birmingham ABC33/40 report....
Figaroa (Kalpoe Attoney)  said that the Kalpoes are still suspects
but the judge thought that the Kalpoes being free would not hinder the investigation
.
They showed Beth with JQK.  (He looked great in jeans and windblown hair.)
They said that Dave has landed in Aruba and they will meet with Mos
tomorrow.


Thanks Magnolia!

Maybe the kalpoe's do not want to leave jail.  The judge said he did not think it would hinder the investigation--I would think the Kalpoes would feel they are being thrown to the dogs.  They thought it was bad in jail, just wait until Papa Sloot, Joe T and others get ahold of them. :P


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: islanders on November 30, 2007, 08:06:03 PM
The purpose of the arrest was not to force them into a confession and have them turn on one another.

It was to give them a choice to either stick with their old lies or make up new ones before going to trial.

So how is that going to look? If they they have to explain why they were lying up until November 30th 2007? And if they change their stories at the trial, they will be asked why they didn't provide that information during the investigation only a few months earlier.

So nothing has changed except Hans Mos has brought them in to establish their lies from two years ago.

This is a pre-trial situation. And what is important to remember this time around is the post-trial lock up.

1) pre-trial (Mos isn't showing all his cards)

2) establishes lies from 2 years ago

3) goes to trial

4) establishes case against them, which will include lies right up to the trial












Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: wreck on November 30, 2007, 08:06:36 PM
Judge who released Kalpoes today.

(http://i103.photobucket.com/albums/m153/CMPM/judge.jpg)

The judge in the case of the disappearance of American teenager Natalee Holloway, whose identity was not released by the government, leaves the San Nicolaas police station in Aruba, Friday, Nov. 30, 2007. The two brothers re-arrested last week as suspects, Satish and Deepak Kalpoe, will be released after the judge did not find 'serious grounds' for suspicion of their involvement in a crime, according to a statement from the prosecutor's office Friday. (AP Photo/Pedro Famous Diaz)

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071130/ap_on_re_la_am_ca/aruba_missing_teen;_ylt=Av9lm4Civ4tXydAjWilQ9zRvaA8F




Thank you Pita.

Does anybody know the name of the judge?

Janet

If this picture is of the judge walking out of the police station, why does it say "drinks" on the door?

Holy crap Katy, good eye!!! I missed that!!
The judge looks like a Greyhound bus driver  :-|


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: MumInOhio on November 30, 2007, 08:07:29 PM
It's a vending machine



Frank …didn’t see this answered…..Kalpoes

2005…June 9th arrested…………….released July 4th
2005…August 26th………………….released September 4th
2007…November 21st………………released November 30th/December 1st
Are you thinking time served?


Ldstlou…..There will be no money for the Kalpoes  as they will not turn over  ALL the documents Dr Phil’s lawyers have requested.   It will not matter what Aruba does with the Kalpoes. IMO



Thanks Pita for a photo of JUDGE NO-NAME…someone has to know who he is!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: ldstlou on November 30, 2007, 08:08:48 PM
Glenda/Julia is having a good laugh over Beth at RU...she really needs to be thrown down and stomped on...sickening slut.

She is so pathetic...she is so damned jealous of Beth!! She is trying to give Greta the scoop because she wants to be on tv so bad again and everyone is ignoring her!!
AAAhhhh...did you notice gwen and glenda are posting to each other? Aren't glenda and gwen one and the same??!! No one else is buying her bs anymore so she talks to herself.  :lol: Too pathetic to even waste our time with a throw down and a stomp. Can you imagine?! Hell 2 years later we still have to hear about the supposed "push" by Jug!!! :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Katysmom on November 30, 2007, 08:09:04 PM
It's a vending machine

Ahhhh; I see it now.  Thanx Frank


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on November 30, 2007, 08:10:02 PM
Fox update..Interview with Tito and new greaseball attorney representing Tacos  Law firm

http://youtube.com/watch?v=xT1e6ipPFlY


Tito performing his rare blend of Papiajivehonkingenglesio.


Lol....thanks day, I really needed that chuckle...it helped. :smt052


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Maria on November 30, 2007, 08:10:05 PM
Judge who released Kalpoes today.

(http://i103.photobucket.com/albums/m153/CMPM/judge.jpg)

The judge in the case of the disappearance of American teenager Natalee Holloway, whose identity was not released by the government, leaves the San Nicolaas police station in Aruba, Friday, Nov. 30, 2007. The two brothers re-arrested last week as suspects, Satish and Deepak Kalpoe, will be released after the judge did not find 'serious grounds' for suspicion of their involvement in a crime, according to a statement from the prosecutor's office Friday. (AP Photo/Pedro Famous Diaz)

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071130/ap_on_re_la_am_ca/aruba_missing_teen;_ylt=Av9lm4Civ4tXydAjWilQ9zRvaA8F

Almost looks like Jimmy Carter to me.



Thank you Pita.

Does anybody know the name of the judge?

Janet

If this picture is of the judge walking out of the police station, why does it say "drinks" on the door?

Holy crap Katy, good eye!!! I missed that!!
The judge looks like a Greyhound bus driver  :-|


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Frank on November 30, 2007, 08:10:15 PM
What I was thinking is that Joran has spent more time than the Kalpoe's in jail, right along with the theory of lesser crimes.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Anna on November 30, 2007, 08:10:41 PM
Judge who released Kalpoes today.

(http://i103.photobucket.com/albums/m153/CMPM/judge.jpg)

The judge in the case of the disappearance of American teenager Natalee Holloway, whose identity was not released by the government, leaves the San Nicolaas police station in Aruba, Friday, Nov. 30, 2007. The two brothers re-arrested last week as suspects, Satish and Deepak Kalpoe, will be released after the judge did not find 'serious grounds' for suspicion of their involvement in a crime, according to a statement from the prosecutor's office Friday. (AP Photo/Pedro Famous Diaz)

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071130/ap_on_re_la_am_ca/aruba_missing_teen;_ylt=Av9lm4Civ4tXydAjWilQ9zRvaA8F




Thank you Pita.

Does anybody know the name of the judge?

Janet

If this picture is of the judge walking out of the police station, why does it say "drinks" on the door?


It doesn't.  That is on the front of a soft DRINK vending machine apparently in the hallway at the jail.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on November 30, 2007, 08:10:48 PM
The purpose of the arrest was not to force them into a confession and have them turn on one another.

It was to give them a choice to either stick with their old lies or make up new ones before going to trial.

So how is that going to look? If they they have to explain why they were lying up until November 30th 2007? And if they change their stories at the trial, they will be asked why they didn't provide that information during the investigation only a few months earlier.

So nothing has changed except Hans Mos has brought them in to establish their lies from two years ago.

This is a pre-trial situation. And what is important to remember this time around is the post-trial lock up.

1) pre-trial (Mos isn't showing all his cards)

2) establishes lies from 2 years ago

3) goes to trial

4) establishes case against them, which will include lies right up to the trial



I like what you're saying, Islander. Makes sense.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Observer on November 30, 2007, 08:11:38 PM
It's a vending machine

Thanks Pita for a photo of JUDGE NO-NAME…someone has to know who he is!


Maybee this is Paul Van Der Sloots buddy Judge Smid?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: wreck on November 30, 2007, 08:12:36 PM
Quote
The judge looks like a Greyhound bus driver

...and Jimmy Carter  :-|


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: ldstlou on November 30, 2007, 08:12:40 PM
It's a vending machine



Frank …didn’t see this answered…..Kalpoes

2005…June 9th arrested…………….released July 4th
2005…August 26th………………….released September 4th
2007…November 21st………………released November 30th/December 1st
Are you thinking time served?


Ldstlou…..There will be no money for the Kalpoes  as they will not turn over  ALL the documents Dr Phil’s lawyers have requested.   It will not matter what Aruba does with the Kalpoes. IMO



Thanks Pita for a photo of JUDGE NO-NAME…someone has to know who he is!


Thanks Mum...that was my attempt at sarcastic humor...did ya catch it?  :2doh: :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: ldstlou on November 30, 2007, 08:14:17 PM
Quote
The judge looks like a Greyhound bus driver

...and Jimmy Carter  :-|

where's the peanuts..lol...and I think Katy was correct...is he coming out of a bar?! :shock:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: robots on November 30, 2007, 08:14:30 PM
maybe the email i got earlier wasnt so far off the mark


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tylergal on November 30, 2007, 08:14:33 PM
Fox update..Interview with Tito and new greaseball attorney representing Tacos  Law firm

http://youtube.com/watch?v=xT1e6ipPFlY


Tito performing his rare blend of Papiajivehonkingenglesio.


Lol....thanks day, I really needed that chuckle...it helped. :smt052

You know what, Nutt, an old man used to tell me when I was quite young (most of the time mad at my husband because he had to work every holiday) and other people had their husbands home --- he would say, "the sun don't shine up the same dog's ass every morning."  Just wait.  Every dog his/her day.  It's coming.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: MumInOhio on November 30, 2007, 08:14:36 PM
What I was thinking is that Joran has spent more time than the Kalpoe's in jail, right along with the theory of lesser crimes.



Thanks.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: ldstlou on November 30, 2007, 08:16:25 PM
maybe the email i got earlier wasnt so far off the mark

can you share?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Anna on November 30, 2007, 08:16:34 PM
In order for the Kalpoes ti have serious evidence of hiding a corpse, there had to have first been one.

A body /  A Case, Paulus!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Pita on November 30, 2007, 08:16:39 PM
Judge who released Kalpoes today.

(http://i103.photobucket.com/albums/m153/CMPM/judge.jpg)

The judge in the case of the disappearance of American teenager Natalee Holloway, whose identity was not released by the government, leaves the San Nicolaas police station in Aruba, Friday, Nov. 30, 2007. The two brothers re-arrested last week as suspects, Satish and Deepak Kalpoe, will be released after the judge did not find 'serious grounds' for suspicion of their involvement in a crime, according to a statement from the prosecutor's office Friday. (AP Photo/Pedro Famous Diaz)

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071130/ap_on_re_la_am_ca/aruba_missing_teen;_ylt=Av9lm4Civ4tXydAjWilQ9zRvaA8F




Thank you Pita.

Does anybody know the name of the judge?

Janet

If this picture is of the judge walking out of the police station, why does it say "drinks" on the door?

I wondered the same thing??    (http://www.cosgan.de/images/midi/konfus/a015.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on November 30, 2007, 08:17:09 PM

Maybee this is Paul Van Der Sloots buddy Judge Smid?

Have we ever seen a picture of Smiddy? I know we've seen Witty.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Leslie on November 30, 2007, 08:18:24 PM
The judge who released the Kalpoe's looks like the man who was pictured admonishing PVDS for his demeaning remarks against his fellow lawyers.  You posted the newspaper article days ago with the picture of PVDS with a dunce cap.  I cannot find it by using the search feature.  Could you find it for me please?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: mishy on November 30, 2007, 08:18:43 PM
(http://img256.imageshack.us/img256/9131/hansyc2.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)

Video
http://tinyurl.com/2287fj
Brothers to be freed in Natalee Holloway case


The decision was "a bit of a setback," said Hans Mos, Aruba's chief public prosecutor. But it does not change his plan to decide by the end of the year whether to prosecute anyone in the Holloway case.

"We had hoped for a longer period to confront these suspects with the material we have against them, but this is the way the law says it must go," Mos said.

Holloway's parents are expected to meet with Mos on Saturday. The prosecutor said he will explain to them what happened, "if I can explain it. I hope I can."

Deepak Kalpoe's defense attorney, meanwhile, said his client is "really happy to recover his freedom after 10 days in jail."

Prosecutors have three days to appeal the decision and will decide Monday whether or not to do so.

A third man, Joran van der Sloot, is still being held in the case. Van der Sloot is set to appear before a judge December 7, and prosecutors have said they are considering requesting that he be detained another 60 days.

The Kalpoe brothers were previously jailed in the case, but were rearrested last week and charged with being involved in the "voluntary manslaughter" of Holloway.

The judge reasoned Friday that "the new evidence, together with the existing evidence in this case, produce serious grounds for the suspicion of some kind of aiding and abetting, of covering up the traces of a crime committed or of the disposing of a corpse," prosecutors said.

But people accused of those crimes do not qualify for pretrial detention under Aruban law, Mos told reporters. He noted that on Monday, the same judge approved van der Sloot's continuing detention based on the same evidence.

"Apparently, the judge sees a difference between the third suspect and these two suspects," Mos said, since the judge concluded the evidence against the Kalpoes was not strong enough to warrant their continued detention.



http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/americas/11/30/aruba.holloway/index.html

Thanks *******. This stuff worries me...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on November 30, 2007, 08:18:47 PM
Quote
The judge looks like a Greyhound bus driver

...and Jimmy Carter  :-|

where's the peanuts..lol...and I think Katy was correct...is he coming out of a bar?! :shock:

He does look like he could use a drink.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Helen Back on November 30, 2007, 08:19:09 PM
I was watching a talk show one night about 2 months ago and authorities including CIA/FBI agent and a couple pathologists, etc., were discussing murder and the resolution rate in the USA.  They said it was about 50% whereas before the 1960s it was about 90%.  Why do you think that is?  We, the people, want to know more than we are entitled to know but we scream freedom of press, and by doing so, police and prosecutors often have to give us so much detail that it gives the perps information they are able to use in eluding conviction.  So maybe we are demanding too much here while Mos is trying to keep some information close to the vest.  I think we will know more by JQKs expression if we are fortunate to have him on TV this weekend.  Maybe that is who is going to be on KGs' program Saturday night, our big surprise, or is it Beth or Dave in an exclusive?

Thank you.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Observer on November 30, 2007, 08:19:13 PM

Maybee this is Paul Van Der Sloots buddy Judge Smid?

Have we ever seen a picture of Smiddy? I know we've seen Witty.

No we have not. He is a very elusive and no pics on the net that I am aware of :-?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: robots on November 30, 2007, 08:19:25 PM
maybe the email i got earlier wasnt so far off the mark

can you share?

well, from what my neighbor can tell me it says "basically they got them"

but since i screwed it up so bad, i better wait till i get more information  :lol: :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: robots on November 30, 2007, 08:21:35 PM
"the new evidence, together with the existing evidence in this case, produce serious grounds for the suspicion of some kind of aiding and abetting, of covering up the traces of a crime committed or of the disposing of a corpse," prosecutors said.


that is some pretty powerful stuff

uhhhhhhhh  JOE - there is NEW EVIDENCE the judge just said so


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: sirensong on November 30, 2007, 08:23:17 PM
Quote Hans Mos "He has suggested her death was an accident."

This is what worries me.  No way in hell was Natalee's death an "accident".



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: MumInOhio on November 30, 2007, 08:24:14 PM

Maybee this is Paul Van Der Sloots buddy Judge Smid?

Have we ever seen a picture of Smiddy? I know we've seen Witty.

No we have not. He is a very elusive and no pics on the net that I am aware of :-?


Been looking for the last week and as ******* says no pics, not much of anything.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: MuffyBee on November 30, 2007, 08:24:27 PM
Judge who released Kalpoes today.

(http://i103.photobucket.com/albums/m153/CMPM/judge.jpg)

The judge in the case of the disappearance of American teenager Natalee Holloway, whose identity was not released by the government, leaves the San Nicolaas police station in Aruba, Friday, Nov. 30, 2007. The two brothers re-arrested last week as suspects, Satish and Deepak Kalpoe, will be released after the judge did not find 'serious grounds' for suspicion of their involvement in a crime, according to a statement from the prosecutor's office Friday. (AP Photo/Pedro Famous Diaz)

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071130/ap_on_re_la_am_ca/aruba_missing_teen;_ylt=Av9lm4Civ4tXydAjWilQ9zRvaA8F




Thank you Pita.

Does anybody know the name of the judge?

Janet

If this picture is of the judge walking out of the police station, why does it say "drinks" on the door?

Holy crap Katy, good eye!!! I missed that!!


Look closer.  It's a soda machine.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on November 30, 2007, 08:24:51 PM

Maybee this is Paul Van Der Sloots buddy Judge Smid?

Have we ever seen a picture of Smiddy? I know we've seen Witty.

No we have not. He is a very elusive and no pics on the net that I am aware of :-?


He is a very elusive

As well he should be.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: WhiskeyGirl on November 30, 2007, 08:25:37 PM
Birmingham ABC33/40 report....
Figaroa (Kalpoe Attoney)  said that the Kalpoes are still suspects
but the judge thought that the Kalpoes being free would not hinder the investigation
.
They showed Beth with JQK.  (He looked great in jeans and windblown hair.)
They said that Dave has landed in Aruba and they will meet with Mos
tomorrow.


Thanks Magnolia!

Maybe the kalpoe's do not want to leave jail.  The judge said he did not think it would hinder the investigation--I would think the Kalpoes would feel they are being thrown to the dogs.  They thought it was bad in jail, just wait until Papa Sloot, Joe T and others get ahold of them. :P

 :lol:

(you forgot Anita and Mama...)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: WhiskeyGirl on November 30, 2007, 08:28:54 PM
Judge who released Kalpoes today.

(http://i103.photobucket.com/albums/m153/CMPM/judge.jpg)

The judge in the case of the disappearance of American teenager Natalee Holloway, whose identity was not released by the government, leaves the San Nicolaas police station in Aruba, Friday, Nov. 30, 2007. The two brothers re-arrested last week as suspects, Satish and Deepak Kalpoe, will be released after the judge did not find 'serious grounds' for suspicion of their involvement in a crime, according to a statement from the prosecutor's office Friday. (AP Photo/Pedro Famous Diaz)

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071130/ap_on_re_la_am_ca/aruba_missing_teen;_ylt=Av9lm4Civ4tXydAjWilQ9zRvaA8F




Thank you Pita.

Does anybody know the name of the judge?

Janet

If this picture is of the judge walking out of the police station, why does it say "drinks" on the door?

I wondered the same thing??    (http://www.cosgan.de/images/midi/konfus/a015.gif)

Is it a cultural thing?

Maybe...where they 'dispense' justice, along with other things?

I wonder what is dispensed at other watering holes?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: ldstlou on November 30, 2007, 08:29:25 PM
Judge who released Kalpoes today.

(http://i103.photobucket.com/albums/m153/CMPM/judge.jpg)

The judge in the case of the disappearance of American teenager Natalee Holloway, whose identity was not released by the government, leaves the San Nicolaas police station in Aruba, Friday, Nov. 30, 2007. The two brothers re-arrested last week as suspects, Satish and Deepak Kalpoe, will be released after the judge did not find 'serious grounds' for suspicion of their involvement in a crime, according to a statement from the prosecutor's office Friday. (AP Photo/Pedro Famous Diaz)

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071130/ap_on_re_la_am_ca/aruba_missing_teen;_ylt=Av9lm4Civ4tXydAjWilQ9zRvaA8F




Thank you Pita.

Does anybody know the name of the judge?

Janet

If this picture is of the judge walking out of the police station, why does it say "drinks" on the door?

Holy crap Katy, good eye!!! I missed that!!


Look closer.  It's a soda machine.

I am even more impressed!! Better eye Muffy!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: GabbyG on November 30, 2007, 08:30:54 PM
Judge who released Kalpoes today.

(http://i103.photobucket.com/albums/m153/CMPM/judge.jpg)

The judge in the case of the disappearance of American teenager Natalee Holloway, whose identity was not released by the government, leaves the San Nicolaas police station in Aruba, Friday, Nov. 30, 2007. The two brothers re-arrested last week as suspects, Satish and Deepak Kalpoe, will be released after the judge did not find 'serious grounds' for suspicion of their involvement in a crime, according to a statement from the prosecutor's office Friday. (AP Photo/Pedro Famous Diaz)

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071130/ap_on_re_la_am_ca/aruba_missing_teen;_ylt=Av9lm4Civ4tXydAjWilQ9zRvaA8F




Thank you Pita.

Does anybody know the name of the judge?

Janet

If this picture is of the judge walking out of the police station, why does it say "drinks" on the door?

Holy crap Katy, good eye!!! I missed that!!
The judge looks like a Greyhound bus driver  :-|

HAHA...I was thinking to myself, who does he remind me of???   Thats IT!!  LOLOL

But, even as I sit here and laugh I feel bad about doing it because what if THIS judge is finally an honest judge? What if he is going to do his best to see that this case/trial are done right?  We don't know yet, and his expression is pretty serious in that picture. Wow, mine would be too I think. His reputation is on the line as well as Mos's and Aruba's.
After I thought about that I was still grinning but the snickering stopped  :silent:  LOL


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: ldstlou on November 30, 2007, 08:31:11 PM
Birmingham ABC33/40 report....
Figaroa (Kalpoe Attoney)  said that the Kalpoes are still suspects
but the judge thought that the Kalpoes being free would not hinder the investigation
.
They showed Beth with JQK.  (He looked great in jeans and windblown hair.)
They said that Dave has landed in Aruba and they will meet with Mos
tomorrow.


Thanks Magnolia!

Maybe the kalpoe's do not want to leave jail.  The judge said he did not think it would hinder the investigation--I would think the Kalpoes would feel they are being thrown to the dogs.  They thought it was bad in jail, just wait until Papa Sloot, Joe T and others get ahold of them. :P

 :lol:

(you forgot Anita and Mama...)

good point!! And all the locals who are tired of the media there again...and the loss of their tourists and tips!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on November 30, 2007, 08:31:46 PM
Come on!  Thats ridiculous.  Mos hoped to have more time to confront them??????   Well he has not talked to them in a whole week since they've been there.  I heard no one has talked to them since last Friday.   Why didn't they make good use of the time they did have for goodness sakes!  What a bunch of baloney.  I don't know why some of you guys have such faith in this Mos person???

Why do you continue to believe everything the defense attorneys say?

Klaas ... Deepak and Satish's defence attorneys claimed that there was not sufficient evidence to hold them on the suspicion of voluntary manslaughter ... the defence attorney announced to the world prior to the judge's ruling today that Deepak and Satish were going to be released.  They were right.

For the past week Hans Mos has been claiming just the opposite ... he was wrong.

As in the past ... it seems that the defence attorney and the judge are on the same page as far as what constitutes whether evidence is strong or insuffient under Dutch law.

As in the past ... Natalee Holloways parents again are forced to ride the emotional roller coaster from H---.

Klaas ... you and I have the same objective ... Justice for Natalee.  However ... we definitely have a different perspective regarding the recent happenings in Aruba but ... please do not hold that against me.  In my quest ... I have to say it how I see it.

If I am wrong and ... it is revealed that Aruba is genuinely pursuing justice for Natalee ... I will concede ... happily concede.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: WhiskeyGirl on November 30, 2007, 08:35:16 PM
I wonder if this applies to Aruba?

http://www.caribbeancourtofjustice.org/papersandarticles/ccj-code%20of%20conduct.pdf

I wonder what organization holds judges accountable for their behavior?

Who's watching the chamber?

Does a watched chamber ever boil?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: ldstlou on November 30, 2007, 08:36:54 PM
Come on!  Thats ridiculous.  Mos hoped to have more time to confront them??????   Well he has not talked to them in a whole week since they've been there.  I heard no one has talked to them since last Friday.   Why didn't they make good use of the time they did have for goodness sakes!  What a bunch of baloney.  I don't know why some of you guys have such faith in this Mos person???

Why do you continue to believe everything the defense attorneys say?

Klaas ... Deepak and Satish's defence attorneys claimed that there was not sufficient evidence to hold them on the suspicion of voluntary manslaughter ... the defence attorney announced to the world prior to the judge's ruling today that Deepak and Satish were going to be released.  They were right.

For the past week Hans Mos has been claiming just the opposite ... he was wrong.

As in the past ... it seems that the defence attorney and the judge are on the same page as far as what constitutes whether evidence is strong or insuffient under Dutch law.

As in the past ... Natalee Holloways parents again are forced to ride the emotional roller coaster from H---.

Klaas ... you and I have the same objective ... Justice for Natalee.  However ... we definitely have a different perspective regarding the recent happenings in Aruba but ... please do not hold that against me.  In my quest ... I have to say it how I see it.

If I am wrong and ... it is revealed that Aruba is genuinely pursuing justice for Natalee ... I will concede ... happily concede.

Janet

Tam, I don't think anyone can hold your doubts against you or anyone else here after the ups and downs we have experienced from the emotional roller coaster Aruba has had us on for so long. Even Beth is very cautious with good news it seems. I am trying to remain positive, Robots helps!! lol And I am praying constantly!! We need a miracle here!! It is the season of miracles!!! Keep the faith!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: AnnieMW1 on November 30, 2007, 08:37:18 PM
Ia m absolutely torn down the middle...part of me think this is just Bullcrap...well planned and executed....the have still wants to believe...so I am just gonna go get drunk!!

ME TOO!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: greeneyedlady on November 30, 2007, 08:39:23 PM
idfwiw...gwen used to be gagal05, but was banned at RU then came back as gwen. You are right tho not as many are paying attention to Glenda/Julia as they use to... :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: robots on November 30, 2007, 08:41:41 PM
Come on!  Thats ridiculous.  Mos hoped to have more time to confront them??????   Well he has not talked to them in a whole week since they've been there.  I heard no one has talked to them since last Friday.   Why didn't they make good use of the time they did have for goodness sakes!  What a bunch of baloney.  I don't know why some of you guys have such faith in this Mos person???

Why do you continue to believe everything the defense attorneys say?

Klaas ... Deepak and Satish's defence attorneys claimed that there was not sufficient evidence to hold them on the suspicion of voluntary manslaughter ... the defence attorney announced to the world prior to the judge's ruling today that Deepak and Satish were going to be released.  They were right.

For the past week Hans Mos has been claiming just the opposite ... he was wrong.

As in the past ... it seems that the defence attorney and the judge are on the same page as far as what constitutes whether evidence is strong or insuffient under Dutch law.

As in the past ... Natalee Holloways parents again are forced to ride the emotional roller coaster from H---.

Klaas ... you and I have the same objective ... Justice for Natalee.  However ... we definitely have a different perspective regarding the recent happenings in Aruba but ... please do not hold that against me.  In my quest ... I have to say it how I see it.

If I am wrong and ... it is revealed that Aruba is genuinely pursuing justice for Natalee ... I will concede ... happily concede.

Janet

Tam, I don't think anyone can hold your doubts against you or anyone else here after the ups and downs we have experienced from the emotional roller coaster Aruba has had us on for so long. Even Beth is very cautious with good news it seems. I am trying to remain positive, Robots helps!! lol And I am praying constantly!! We need a miracle here!! It is the season of miracles!!! Keep the faith!!!

my guess is that they have tapes of K2 moving or getting rid of a body
and for some crazy reason that is not enough to hold them, because the tapes probably
show that that is exactly what they did. the tapes show that JORAN was with her when she was killed and the K2 were helping their buddy after the fact

but wasnt Mos trying to get them for murder or well it seems for mansalughter
i will still call it murder. but he cant hold them for murder or manslaughter but he can try them for the hiding of a body


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on November 30, 2007, 08:42:04 PM
Come on!  Thats ridiculous.  Mos hoped to have more time to confront them??????   Well he has not talked to them in a whole week since they've been there.  I heard no one has talked to them since last Friday.   Why didn't they make good use of the time they did have for goodness sakes!  What a bunch of baloney.  I don't know why some of you guys have such faith in this Mos person???

Why do you continue to believe everything the defense attorneys say?

Klaas ... Deepak and Satish's defence attorneys claimed that there was not sufficient evidence to hold them on the suspicion of voluntary manslaughter ... the defence attorney announced to the world prior to the judge's ruling today that Deepak and Satish were going to be released.  They were right.

For the past week Hans Mos has been claiming just the opposite ... he was wrong.

As in the past ... it seems that the defence attorney and the judge are on the same page as far as what constitutes whether evidence is strong or insuffient under Dutch law.

As in the past ... Natalee Holloways parents again are forced to ride the emotional roller coaster from H---.

Klaas ... you and I have the same objective ... Justice for Natalee.  However ... we definitely have a different perspective regarding the recent happenings in Aruba but ... please do not hold that against me.  In my quest ... I have to say it how I see it.

If I am wrong and ... it is revealed that Aruba is genuinely pursuing justice for Natalee ... I will concede ... happily concede.

Janet

Tam, I don't think anyone can hold your doubts against you or anyone else here after the ups and downs we have experienced from the emotional roller coaster Aruba has had us on for so long. Even Beth is very cautious with good news it seems. I am trying to remain positive, Robots helps!! lol And I am praying constantly!! We need a miracle here!! It is the season of miracles!!! Keep the faith!!!

Thank you Idstlou.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: ldstlou on November 30, 2007, 08:43:03 PM
idfwiw...gwen used to be gagal05, but was banned at RU then came back as gwen. You are right tho not as many are paying attention to Glenda/Julia as they use to... :wink:

I thought gwen/gagal_05/glenda were all one and the same?!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: ldstlou on November 30, 2007, 08:43:42 PM
Come on!  Thats ridiculous.  Mos hoped to have more time to confront them??????   Well he has not talked to them in a whole week since they've been there.  I heard no one has talked to them since last Friday.   Why didn't they make good use of the time they did have for goodness sakes!  What a bunch of baloney.  I don't know why some of you guys have such faith in this Mos person???

Why do you continue to believe everything the defense attorneys say?

Klaas ... Deepak and Satish's defence attorneys claimed that there was not sufficient evidence to hold them on the suspicion of voluntary manslaughter ... the defence attorney announced to the world prior to the judge's ruling today that Deepak and Satish were going to be released.  They were right.

For the past week Hans Mos has been claiming just the opposite ... he was wrong.

As in the past ... it seems that the defence attorney and the judge are on the same page as far as what constitutes whether evidence is strong or insuffient under Dutch law.

As in the past ... Natalee Holloways parents again are forced to ride the emotional roller coaster from H---.

Klaas ... you and I have the same objective ... Justice for Natalee.  However ... we definitely have a different perspective regarding the recent happenings in Aruba but ... please do not hold that against me.  In my quest ... I have to say it how I see it.

If I am wrong and ... it is revealed that Aruba is genuinely pursuing justice for Natalee ... I will concede ... happily concede.

Janet

Tam, I don't think anyone can hold your doubts against you or anyone else here after the ups and downs we have experienced from the emotional roller coaster Aruba has had us on for so long. Even Beth is very cautious with good news it seems. I am trying to remain positive, Robots helps!! lol And I am praying constantly!! We need a miracle here!! It is the season of miracles!!! Keep the faith!!!

Thank you Idstlou.

 :smt052


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Canary on November 30, 2007, 08:44:17 PM
http://edition.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/americas/11/30/aruba.holloway/index.html#cnnSTCVideo

Moss press conference


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: kathyn2 on November 30, 2007, 08:44:27 PM

I am sorry to say I have to agree with Janet.  I hope I am wrong but so far everything the defense attorneys have come out and said have been true.  And I bet dollars to donuts Joran goes free next.   I HOPE IT ISN'T TRUE.  But so far, from day one, Aruban authorities have done this.   The prosecutors office just seems to stink over there.  I hope I am proved wrong.  I really really do.


Come on!  Thats ridiculous.  Mos hoped to have more time to confront them??????   Well he has not talked to them in a whole week since they've been there.  I heard no one has talked to them since last Friday.   Why didn't they make good use of the time they did have for goodness sakes!  What a bunch of baloney.  I don't know why some of you guys have such faith in this Mos person???

Why do you continue to believe everything the defense attorneys say?

Klaas ... Deepak and Satish's defence attorneys claimed that there was not sufficient evidence to hold them on the suspicion of voluntary manslaughter ... the defence attorney announced to the world prior to the judge's ruling today that Deepak and Satish were going to be released.  They were right.

For the past week Hans Mos has been claiming just the opposite ... he was wrong.

As in the past ... it seems that the defence attorney and the judge are on the same page as far as what constitutes whether evidence is strong or insuffient under Dutch law.

As in the past ... Natalee Holloways parents again are forced to ride the emotional roller coaster from H---.

Klaas ... you and I have the same objective ... Justice for Natalee.  However ... we definitely have a different perspective regarding the recent happenings in Aruba but ... please do not hold that against me.  In my quest ... I have to say it how I see it.

If I am wrong and ... it is revealed that Aruba is genuinely pursuing justice for Natalee ... I will concede ... happily concede.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: klaasend on November 30, 2007, 08:44:29 PM
TUNE IN AT 9PM ET (15 minutes from now)

www.scaredmonkeysradio.com


(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/Pretzer113007.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on November 30, 2007, 08:45:48 PM
It's a vending machine

Thanks Pita for a photo of JUDGE NO-NAME…someone has to know who he is!


Maybee this is Paul Van Der Sloots buddy Judge Smid?

thinking the same thing...also, will Joran have the same Judge??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: lexie on November 30, 2007, 08:48:24 PM
Fox update..Interview with Tito and new greaseball attorney representing Tacos  Law firm

http://youtube.com/watch?v=xT1e6ipPFlY


Tito performing his rare blend of Papiajivehonkingenglesio.
:2rofl: :2rofl: :2rofl: :2rofl: :2rofl:
LOL  !!  Great description!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Anna on November 30, 2007, 08:50:22 PM
The Defense Attorneys were saying their clients, the Kalpoes would be released as SUSPECTS a week ago, too.

That has far, far from happened.  In fact a judge has said there are SERIOUS suspicions against them but on different charges.

Now I don't recall hearing even one defense attorney saying that is what was going to happen.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Canary on November 30, 2007, 08:50:35 PM
Moss will decide whether to appeal on Monday

There is not enough per the judge to keep them on the serious charge (vol. mansl.)

There is a lot of evidence for the disposal of the body charge but that charge isn't serious enough to hold them. 

They will stay a part til tomorrow at 4 PM.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tylergal on November 30, 2007, 08:51:32 PM
Will someone sort of transcribe for me since I am having trouble with this new computer getting Dana?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on November 30, 2007, 08:51:48 PM
Ia m absolutely torn down the middle...part of me think this is just Bullcrap...well planned and executed....the have still wants to believe...so I am just gonna go get drunk!!

ME TOO!

I do not drink ... but I do have my weaknesses that I fall back up when I am frustrated and ... today I am frustrated.

I do believe I will partake in a large slice of mud pie that my daughter-in-law brought over as a contribution to our take-out Chinese food dinner.  I think I will forget about the Chinese food and ... go straight for the pie.   :D

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Red on November 30, 2007, 08:52:34 PM
TUNE IN AT 9PM ET (15 minutes from now)

www.scaredmonkeysradio.com


(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/Pretzer113007.jpg)


It will certainly be interesting to hear Jossy's take on the Kalpoe's being released and his prosecutor & Judge basically creating a circus with the case all over again. Not quite the image I am sure Jossy wants for Aruba,


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: ldstlou on November 30, 2007, 08:52:36 PM
http://edition.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/americas/11/30/aruba.holloway/index.html#cnnSTCVideo

Moss press conference

I thought I heard Mos say the judge thought there was "serious material" in regards to k2 being guilty of lesser charges of hiding a body. Did he say serious material or suspicion? I think there is a big difference in my mind at least.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: MumInOhio on November 30, 2007, 08:53:22 PM
I wonder if this applies to Aruba?

http://www.caribbeancourtofjustice.org/papersandarticles/ccj-code%20of%20conduct.pdf

I wonder what organization holds judges accountable for their behavior?

Who's watching the chamber?

Does a watched chamber ever boil?


Posted on this last week to Anna as it appears Judge Wit sp was promoted..per Ramm. Later I read she had not read back. :lol: Checked pics and Jacob Wit sp is our Judge Wit. Does not seem to include Aruba. But not sure and wanted to know what Ramm had posted at BFN.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Canary on November 30, 2007, 08:54:36 PM
Sorry I can't transcribe the press conf. cause it doesn't come in well on my computer - very jerky and hard to understand so I didn't get the exact words


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: klaasend on November 30, 2007, 08:55:55 PM
TUNE IN TO DANA PRETZER NOW - so you are all set up by 9pm ET


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on November 30, 2007, 08:58:50 PM
idfwiw...gwen used to be gagal05, but was banned at RU then came back as gwen. You are right tho not as many are paying attention to Glenda/Julia as they use to... :wink:

I thought gwen/gagal_05/glenda were all one and the same?!
no way


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Anna on November 30, 2007, 09:01:23 PM
Does anyone else think it was just super crappy of Greta to call Beth and just dump on her that the Kalpoes released without even bothering to find out what the judge really said?

Big difference in just being released and being released under suspicion.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: JA on November 30, 2007, 09:02:19 PM
You can bet that Paulus is going to try to contact the Kalpoes whether himslef or a third party.  He is going to want to know exactly what was asked of the Kalpoes and what they answered with.  he then will let Joran's lawyers who in turn will share this with Joran.  I hope they have sense enoguth to tell Papa to take a hike.  They must know by now ( regardless of their involvement) that it is all about Joran, and that Papa is not looking out for them at all unless it saves Joran's hide.  I hope they impressed that on the Kalpoes before releasing them.

Without a doubt, I feel the brothers are guilty of the knowledge that Joran was planning to drug a tourist and sexually assault her.  They assisted in getting her to the car, and sitting by and allowing Joran to sexually assault her.

They also were guilty of obstructing justice by lying to the police, covering up for Joran, most likely to save themselves.  They knew they were involved and I am sure Paulus told them that they would serve time for their involvement, so they must deny everything, because there was no body to prove a crime anyway.  The snowball started rolling at that point and they got in over their heads.

They may have been guilty of assisting Joran with an unconscious, semi-unconscious, injured, or possibly dead Natalee by carrying her in and out of the car to various locations etc.  They may have also helped set up alibis due to Paulus and/or Joran irequest/demand, or been a "chauffer" for Joran that night or in night to follow.  They may have assisted in the disposal of the body, or helped Joran set up some contacts etc.

If any of the above is true and they actually didn't sexually assault her, take part in a possible injury, or negelect to get her medical help while in their "care" this may not be a heavy punishable offense in Dutch Courts.  If you only get 10-15 for a murder, with some of that time being reduced, then they probably wouldn't get much time for the other offenses.

We need to see Paulus picked up!  I don't know Dutch law, but is it possible he is considered immune from what he knows because he is considered one of Joran's lawyers?  That is not to say he isn't guilty of participating int hr evening, but as others have said, maybe Joran needs to be charged with the voluntary murder first.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: klaasend on November 30, 2007, 09:03:05 PM
JOSSY:  The judge saw no merit in the evidence and released them (K2).  The judge rejected the appeal that K2's get the same attorney.  The judge also rejected Joran's appeal except for the bible.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Pita on November 30, 2007, 09:03:45 PM
I wonder if this applies to Aruba?

http://www.caribbeancourtofjustice.org/papersandarticles/ccj-code%20of%20conduct.pdf

I wonder what organization holds judges accountable for their behavior?

Who's watching the chamber?

Does a watched chamber ever boil?


Posted on this last week to Anna as it appears Judge Wit sp was promoted..per Ramm. Later I read she had not read back. :lol: Checked pics and Jacob Wit sp is our Judge Wit. Does not seem to include Aruba. But not sure and wanted to know what Ramm had posted at BFN.

Ramm's post at BFN:

seeing as, almost all the judges are just going there for 3 years before going back to the Netherlands to continue their career as judge in the Netherlands, it is certain that those judges are just as good as any other judge in the Kingdom. They are not second rate judges, they are the same judges that have before and will again be judges in the Netherlands after their tour of duty in the Carribean.

And Judge Witt is now a judge on a higher court in the area, not involved in day to day judging on Curacao (as far as I have found out).


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: WhiskeyGirl on November 30, 2007, 09:03:56 PM
Isn't it possible that someone set up Mos and the prosecutors office?  

The Kalpoes?  I wonder who was on the phone?  Who and what conversations were taped?

Deflect away from the VDS compound?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: klaasend on November 30, 2007, 09:05:27 PM
DANA:  I was livid when JoeT accused Jossy of fabricating evidence.
Is JoeT given any status in Aruba. 

JOSSY:  JoeT can't practice law or activily participate in any court procedings.  He's a loud mouth lawyer. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: klaasend on November 30, 2007, 09:06:26 PM
JOSSY:  All JoeT wants to do is show his face on TV and hear himself talk.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: robots on November 30, 2007, 09:06:40 PM
Does anyone else think it was just super crappy of Greta to call Beth and just dump on her that the Kalpoes released without even bothering to find out what the judge really said?

Big difference in just being released and being released under suspicion.

.

just more confiramtion that greta is a witch


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: robots on November 30, 2007, 09:07:58 PM
You can bet that Paulus is going to try to contact the Kalpoes whether himslef or a third party.  He is going to want to know exactly what was asked of the Kalpoes and what they answered with.  he then will let Joran's lawyers who in turn will share this with Joran.  I hope they have sense enoguth to tell Papa to take a hike.  They must know by now ( regardless of their involvement) that it is all about Joran, and that Papa is not looking out for them at all unless it saves Joran's hide.  I hope they impressed that on the Kalpoes before releasing them.

Without a doubt, I feel the brothers are guilty of the knowledge that Joran was planning to drug a tourist and sexually assault her.  They assisted in getting her to the car, and sitting by and allowing Joran to sexually assault her.

They also were guilty of obstructing justice by lying to the police, covering up for Joran, most likely to save themselves.  They knew they were involved and I am sure Paulus told them that they would serve time for their involvement, so they must deny everything, because there was no body to prove a crime anyway.  The snowball started rolling at that point and they got in over their heads.

They may have been guilty of assisting Joran with an unconscious, semi-unconscious, injured, or possibly dead Natalee by carrying her in and out of the car to various locations etc.  They may have also helped set up alibis due to Paulus and/or Joran irequest/demand, or been a "chauffer" for Joran that night or in night to follow.  They may have assisted in the disposal of the body, or helped Joran set up some contacts etc.

If any of the above is true and they actually didn't sexually assault her, take part in a possible injury, or negelect to get her medical help while in their "care" this may not be a heavy punishable offense in Dutch Courts.  If you only get 10-15 for a murder, with some of that time being reduced, then they probably wouldn't get much time for the other offenses.

We need to see Paulus picked up!  I don't know Dutch law, but is it possible he is considered immune from what he knows because he is considered one of Joran's lawyers?  That is not to say he isn't guilty of participating int hr evening, but as others have said, maybe Joran needs to be charged with the voluntary murder first.

yes, they (  the K2 ) what joran was up to



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Observer on November 30, 2007, 09:08:07 PM
[quote
Amigoe states that judge commissioner still is of the opinion that there is considerable/very serious suspicions against the suspects, but that the things they are most likely going to be charged with (destroying evidence of the crime and making the body disappear" carry such a low prison sentence that for that reason lengthening this part of their incarceration not in accordance with the standing laws and jurisprudence.

From this I would hope to conclude that the DA has at least the same level of suspicion against Joran van der Sloot and that the crimes he is suspected do warrant under law extending of his incarceration.
[/quote]


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: klaasend on November 30, 2007, 09:08:18 PM
JOSSY:  Since the K2's have been released, do you think they will be tried with anything.

They have been released but NOT EXONERATED. 


JOSSY:  JoeT would need a work permit to work in Aruba.  JoeT cannot practice law.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: klaasend on November 30, 2007, 09:09:30 PM
JOSSY:  Does not know the names of the judges.  There were 2.  One for Joran and one for K2's


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: klaasend on November 30, 2007, 09:11:05 PM
JOSSY:  Met with the prosecutor a couple days ago.  Jossy feels that the prosecutor has solid evidence against the suspects, especially pertaining to the sexual assault part of it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Frank on November 30, 2007, 09:12:06 PM
What is so absurd is what in the hell were the Kalpoe's doing there at all? They weren't there to just drive Joran around

What were the Kalpoe's doing there at all?

Accident my ass


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: klaasend on November 30, 2007, 09:12:18 PM
JOSSY:  Will go in front of a judge next Thursday.  Jossy is affraid they may also let Joran go unless they have evidence that pertains specifically to Joran.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 30, 2007, 09:12:34 PM
OMG! Computers have been down at work all day, I just got home and turned on Dana...............I cannot believe it. I'm in shock. I just found out from looking here. OMG!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: klaasend on November 30, 2007, 09:14:04 PM
JOSSY:  They do have new evidence plus found many things missed from the old.  Plus, Jossy thinks they may have found some things when they searched the VDS home.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: JA on November 30, 2007, 09:14:56 PM
We need to all keep faith that this time the case will move forward.  I am not ready to accuse Mos and some of the other prosecuters as playing games this time.  It would just be too painful.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: JA on November 30, 2007, 09:16:41 PM
So, as of the end of the year, what has to happen?  I remember someone saying something about a time limit of December 31, 2007.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 30, 2007, 09:16:43 PM
Please guys, I'm just sick about the Kalpoes being released..............is that it then? They'll release Joran as well. Is it over?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: klaasend on November 30, 2007, 09:17:54 PM
Mike McIntyre www.mikeoncrime.com up next

(http://www.mikeoncrime.com/images/mike.jpg)



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 30, 2007, 09:19:11 PM
I don't know details, haven't been here, but it has to be the judge. It's the same thing as before. Please tell me there isn't anything to indicate Hans Mos was playing a game.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tylergal on November 30, 2007, 09:19:22 PM
You can bet that Paulus is going to try to contact the Kalpoes whether himslef or a third party.  He is going to want to know exactly what was asked of the Kalpoes and what they answered with.  he then will let Joran's lawyers who in turn will share this with Joran.  I hope they have sense enoguth to tell Papa to take a hike.  They must know by now ( regardless of their involvement) that it is all about Joran, and that Papa is not looking out for them at all unless it saves Joran's hide.  I hope they impressed that on the Kalpoes before releasing them.

Without a doubt, I feel the brothers are guilty of the knowledge that Joran was planning to drug a tourist and sexually assault her.  They assisted in getting her to the car, and sitting by and allowing Joran to sexually assault her.

They also were guilty of obstructing justice by lying to the police, covering up for Joran, most likely to save themselves.  They knew they were involved and I am sure Paulus told them that they would serve time for their involvement, so they must deny everything, because there was no body to prove a crime anyway.  The snowball started rolling at that point and they got in over their heads.

They may have been guilty of assisting Joran with an unconscious, semi-unconscious, injured, or possibly dead Natalee by carrying her in and out of the car to various locations etc.  They may have also helped set up alibis due to Paulus and/or Joran irequest/demand, or been a "chauffer" for Joran that night or in night to follow.  They may have assisted in the disposal of the body, or helped Joran set up some contacts etc.

If any of the above is true and they actually didn't sexually assault her, take part in a possible injury, or negelect to get her medical help while in their "care" this may not be a heavy punishable offense in Dutch Courts.  If you only get 10-15 for a murder, with some of that time being reduced, then they probably wouldn't get much time for the other offenses.

We need to see Paulus picked up!  I don't know Dutch law, but is it possible he is considered immune from what he knows because he is considered one of Joran's lawyers?  That is not to say he isn't guilty of participating int hr evening, but as others have said, maybe Joran needs to be charged with the voluntary murder first.


Wearing wires so they can tape Paulus. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: klaasend on November 30, 2007, 09:19:38 PM
Please guys, I'm just sick about the Kalpoes being released..............is that it then? They'll release Joran as well. Is it over?

NO - IT'S NOT OVER - please read back a few pages.  Even if they are all released at the moment does not mean that MOS will not take it to trial.  They are all still suspects. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: AnnieMW1 on November 30, 2007, 09:20:08 PM
Well, 4 vodka tonics and counting.   Those margaritas also look darned good.  I'm not sure what to say Monkeys.  I'm frigging furious that we're still here 2.5 years later, and that Beth and Dave are still getting jerked around, and that the judges are still waiting a day or two or more to deliver their stupid decisions, and that Natalee still hasn't been found...and that these boys are on tape talking about "finding her"...and Aruban justice still seems to suck.

Yet, a part of me is curious about what is going to happen next.  There is so much we don't know.  I'm glad Beth and Dave will meet with Mos tomorrow.  It's THE LEAST the office of the prosecutor could do for this family - meet with them and show them a MODICUM (and I do mean modicum) of respect!!!  And perhaps apologize for the BS this family has been put through.

The one photo I always think of is Beth sitting down in her hotel room in front of a chiffarobe, sifting through cards, letters, photos in Aruba....looking totally haunted and forelorn.  Beth, we are all with you.  Dave, we are all with you.  Natalee, we are all with you.

This case drives me insane.  I want to cry...and why would I cry after 2.5 years?  Because I can't believe we're all still here...and we're all still listening to this bullshit...and Natalee's parents are still being put through all of this.  PLEASE God, if you're up there, grant this family relief.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: ldstlou on November 30, 2007, 09:20:47 PM
We need to all keep faith that this time the case will move forward.  I am not ready to accuse Mos and some of the other prosecuters as playing games this time.  It would just be too painful.



Jossy spoke well of Mos and thinks he is legit. Says they do have new evidence. Keep the faith and keep up the prayers!! 'tis the season of miracles!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Observer on November 30, 2007, 09:22:10 PM
Please guys, I'm just sick about the Kalpoes being released..............is that it then? They'll release Joran as well. Is it over?

It will never be over until Justice is served.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 30, 2007, 09:22:14 PM
Please guys, I'm just sick about the Kalpoes being released..............is that it then? They'll release Joran as well. Is it over?

NO - IT'S NOT OVER - please read back a few pages.  Even if they are all released at the moment does not mean that MOS will not take it to trial.  They are all still suspects. 

Thank you Klaas...........for answering and for your answer. Yes, I'll go read.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tylergal on November 30, 2007, 09:22:17 PM
JOSSY:  Will go in front of a judge next Thursday.  Jossy is affraid they may also let Joran go unless they have evidence that pertains specifically to Joran.

Thanks, Klaas.  You are the best, but Jossy is contradicting himself, NO?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: klaasend on November 30, 2007, 09:22:55 PM
CBB


(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/NE121007.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Helen Back on November 30, 2007, 09:22:58 PM
Please guys, I'm just sick about the Kalpoes being released..............is that it then? They'll release Joran as well. Is it over?

released from further detention at this time.  Not exonerated.  Serious suspicion of helping dispose of a corpse and disposal of evidence.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: ldstlou on November 30, 2007, 09:23:53 PM
Please guys, I'm just sick about the Kalpoes being released..............is that it then? They'll release Joran as well. Is it over?

CBB, not over, they are released but not exonerated. Judge feels strong material for suspicion of covering a crime and hiding corpse. We don't know if there is different material pertaining to joran, but the same judge that release k2, did order joran to 8 days, so maybe additional info on joran, or material implicates only joran of the manslaughter charges.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: islanders on November 30, 2007, 09:24:23 PM
I was listening to Dana's show. Wow, that was cool to see the folks here at Scared Monkey being discussed with the case!

Congrats you guys!

I'm not jumping ship until Hans Mos says he isn't pressing charges.

He is probably trying to buy some time for the ocean search.

These suspects were just arrested for questioning. This party is just getting started.



 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: klaasend on November 30, 2007, 09:24:29 PM
JOSSY:  Will go in front of a judge next Thursday.  Jossy is affraid they may also let Joran go unless they have evidence that pertains specifically to Joran.

Thanks, Klaas.  You are the best, but Jossy is contradicting himself, NO?

What Jossy is saying is that IF they same New Evidence is in Joran's file then the Judge may release Joran from custody as well.  IF

Now that said, being released does not release them as suspects.  It only means that they can't be held in pre-trial detention. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: AZSunny on November 30, 2007, 09:24:52 PM
Fox update..Interview with Tito and new greaseball attorney representing Tacos  Law firm

http://youtube.com/watch?v=xT1e6ipPFlY


Tito performing his rare blend of Papiajivehonkingenglesio.


Lol....thanks day, I really needed that chuckle...it helped. :smt052

You know what, Nutt, an old man used to tell me when I was quite young (most of the time mad at my husband because he had to work every holiday) and other people had their husbands home --- he would say, "the sun don't shine up the same dog's ass every morning."   Just wait.  Every dog his/her day.  It's coming.

Tyler, that is a quote my father used to say as well.  The last time he used it was when my Niece's team had lost a game, and she was depressed. She was about 13 at the time.   She quoted him in her speech when she became an all American  in collegefor the third time, and everyone in the audience broke up laughing. She was referring to the fact that her college team had been defeated in the playoffs after having won the previous year.  Thanks for the memory.  But now I am sad for not having him here!  Yes,  he was from Georgia!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Leslie on November 30, 2007, 09:25:50 PM
On HGTV Canada right now on Selling Houses Abroad " a couple search for an oceanfront home in Aruba".  Joe and Mercy just saw a $ million+  home that didn't have a bathtub but it was close to a golf course.  Looks like Tierra del Sol to me.  
Just bizarre watching this.  They just showed the California lighthouse.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: klaasend on November 30, 2007, 09:25:54 PM
CBB

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/6ly4kyq.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: ldstlou on November 30, 2007, 09:26:19 PM
JOSSY:  Will go in front of a judge next Thursday.  Jossy is affraid they may also let Joran go unless they have evidence that pertains specifically to Joran.

Thanks, Klaas.  You are the best, but Jossy is contradicting himself, NO?

I didn't get that...think he says..if material is same..he will go...BUT if material pertained to joran or additional material, he can be held over.

We have guessed that j2 knew what happened, but most probably joran was with Natalee alone when it happened. It could be the case and so only joran can be charged with manslaughter.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: WhiskeyGirl on November 30, 2007, 09:26:31 PM
Jossy had some good points...
(my parapharase)

Many on Aruba have sons and daughters.  They want the case solved and would like the parents of Natalee to have answers.
~~~~~~

I can't imagine living in a place where this kind of thing is going on.  The only thing that comes to mind in the U.S. right now is Bolingbrook and Stacy.   I see a lot of similarities.

When you're in the middle of a nightmare, how do you wake up?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: klaasend on November 30, 2007, 09:26:38 PM
On HGTV Canada right now on Selling Houses Abroad " a couple search for an oceanfront home in Aruba".  Joe and Mercy just saw a $ million+  home that didn't have a bathtub but it was close to a golf course.  Looks like Tierra del Sol to me.  
Just bizarre watching this.  They just showed the California lighthouse.

Yeah, it's a repeat of a show they did about a year ago. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: mishy on November 30, 2007, 09:31:10 PM
You can bet that Paulus is going to try to contact the Kalpoes whether himslef or a third party.  He is going to want to know exactly what was asked of the Kalpoes and what they answered with.  he then will let Joran's lawyers who in turn will share this with Joran.  I hope they have sense enoguth to tell Papa to take a hike.  They must know by now ( regardless of their involvement) that it is all about Joran, and that Papa is not looking out for them at all unless it saves Joran's hide.  I hope they impressed that on the Kalpoes before releasing them.


[/quote

Hopefully all of their phones are bugged and they're being watched in case Paulus or one of his minions tries to contact them...]


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Anna on November 30, 2007, 09:35:10 PM
Greta is way overdue to have John Q Kelly on her program to offset Joe T.  She has had Joe T on ten times since JQK at least that I have seen.

Does anyone know who she will have from Aruba?  I wonder if she now understands that the Kalpoes were not released from being suspects just from PRETRIAL detention.

I like that word pretrial as it indicates that a trial is in the works.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Anna on November 30, 2007, 09:37:42 PM
WOW, that commercial is REALLY loud!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: klaasend on November 30, 2007, 09:38:09 PM
Stephanie Good -  up next


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: WhiskeyGirl on November 30, 2007, 09:38:17 PM
Greta is way overdue to have John Q Kelly on her program to offset Joe T.  She has had Joe T on ten times since JQK at least that I have seen.

Does anyone know who she will have from Aruba?  I wonder if she now understands that the Kalpoes were not released from being suspects just from PRETRIAL detention.

I like that word pretrial as it indicates that a trial is in the works.

I wonder, if a suspect leave the country, and no trial is held, does that mean a crime has not happened?



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: robots on November 30, 2007, 09:39:28 PM
i can see a trial coming

K2 will get minor charges thrown at them

joran will get more of course


they are NOT released as suspects,

pretrial  :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: islanders on November 30, 2007, 09:39:52 PM
Please guys, I'm just sick about the Kalpoes being released..............is that it then? They'll release Joran as well. Is it over?

(I posted this a few pages back. I don't think their release is significant. Lets wait to see if there will be a trial.)

The purpose of the arrest was not to force them into a confession and have them turn on one another.

It was to give them a choice to either stick with their old lies or make up new ones before going to trial.

So how is that going to look? If they they have to explain why they were lying up until November 30th 2007? And if they change their stories at the trial, they will be asked why they didn't provide that information during the investigation only a few months earlier.

So nothing has changed except Hans Mos has brought them in to establish their lies from two years ago.

This is a pre-trial situation. And what is important to remember this time around is the post-trial lock up.

1) pre-trial (Mos isn't showing all his cards)

2) establishes lies from 2 years ago

3) goes to trial

4) establishes case against them, which will include lies right up to the trial









Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on November 30, 2007, 09:40:28 PM
What is so absurd is what in the hell were the Kalpoe's doing there at all? They weren't there to just drive Joran around

What were the Kalpoe's doing there at all?

Accident my ass

Frank ... I believe that Natalee's death was unintentional.  However ... unintentional or not ... Natalee's death resulted from wrong doing ... premeditated wronging.

Janet

++++++++++++++++++++


Diana Emerencia - Freddy's Attorney
Decatur Daily News
August 31, 2005


Freddy Alexander Zedan-Arambatzis, a friend of van der Sloot and the Kalpoes, was arrested on suspicion of having unspecified "physical contact" with a female minor, said his lawyer, Diana Emerencia.

Zedan-Arambatzis, 21, is also suspected of photographing the girl in "tempting poses" and showing the images to other people, Emerencia said.

The Kalpoe brothers and van der Sloot are also suspected of involvement in the incident, which allegedly occurred before Holloway disappeared, she said.


Jossy Mansur
'Scarborough Country'
August 26, 2005


DANIELS:  It definitely smells that way.  You know, if you take the prosecution‘s statement at its face, we are talking on a whole new level, the charges here.  We are talking about drugs.  We are talking about rape and we are talking about rape of many different people.  There are four guys now in custody, four best friends.  What does that tell you?
 
MANSUR:  Well, what it tells me is that, really, these four guys are friends.  They belong to the same group, these party boys that go out and prey on young, unsuspected girls or other kinds of girls also that are out to have a good time, not suspecting what they‘re in for with these predators around.

And they are—they not only appear in photographs together, but I understand that Freddy lives very near to the Joran house.  So, there is a bond between them.  There is a group that they call themselves the pimps, in which all of these participate.


Beth Twitty
'The Abrams Report'
August 4, 2005


TWITTY:  You know it's a pretty long scenario; we have a lot of details.  You know the main thing to sum it up is you know Joran, how he entered this establishment.  I believe that you know if you enter on the right side, you have to have a valid I.D.  If you enter Carlos N' Charlie's on the left side, you must have some type of—I don't know if it's a VIP pass or what to enter, but Joran enters the establishment on the left side, approaches these groups of tourists. 

You know it's interesting how he is able to try to work his way in and connect and establish himself in that—in Carlos N' Charlie's, was walking her around and these other tourists and was able to point out Satish and Deepak Kalpoe.  They were sitting ironically in the same corner, the same stools that they were seated at in the picture that's been all over international media, so that must be their spot that they wait while Joran is working.  


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: WhiskeyGirl on November 30, 2007, 09:40:37 PM
I wonder how many people know about the corpse?   :shock:

no corpse/no body/no case

How many people know what happened to the body?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: klaasend on November 30, 2007, 09:41:07 PM
Posted by Lazlo at RU:

lazlo wrote:

In 2006 they have tried ppl to befriend Joran to get him to tell them things (In Holland that is considered infiltration), that was no succes since back then Joran was extremely paranoide (resulted in circumstancial only).

I do not know if simular was tried again in 2007 but I would expect it was since it is known that ppl get less carefull/alert over time.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: mishy on November 30, 2007, 09:44:10 PM
I was listening to Dana's show. Wow, that was cool to see the folks here at Scared Monkey being discussed with the case!

Congrats you guys!

I'm not jumping ship until Hans Mos says he isn't pressing charges.

He is probably trying to buy some time for the ocean search.

These suspects were just arrested for questioning. This party is just getting started.



 

I like the way you think, Islanders...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Observer on November 30, 2007, 09:49:34 PM
Hat tip to Heli at refugee site:& Pearl@BFN

http://www.diario-aruba.com/2007/11/30/

A badly informed lawyer By: Jossy M. Mansur

Once again this man, who thinks himself a star lawyer, has given various televised interviews in which he unfortunately proves that he has no control over his emotions, and uttered one nonsense after the other in angry tone he could not camouflage! What is he looking for really? Popularity?

This certainly is not the way to achieve his goal! I have an immense regard for Greta, but I can't understand why she gives this man the last word and doesn't let us confront him. Neither does she with the facts of the case, which Greta is fully aware of, I'm sure. Maybe in the US, there might be some people that are afraid of his tongue and temper, but with me, he is climbing the wrong tree!

How does a lawyer who pretends to have any class, say that what I've quoted from Joran's deposition isn't true? I again publish this document in the original Dutch, with a translation in English. This should put duct tape on Tacopina's mouth.

 In the referred document, Joran said to four Aruban police officers that he thinks he might know where Natalee's body is buried, and that he thinks that Deepak went back to the beach where the girl was lying on the sand, raped and killed Natalee, and afterward buried her close to the first fishermen's hut!

And he also wants to ignore a taped conversation in a police car, where the three suspects (Joran, Deepak and Satish were sitting in the back seat), trying to make his client, Joran, come out "innocent" in his confrontation with Deepak.

Does this lawyer know how to read? Or is he simply dumb?

Deepak said directly to Joran (and the police have this tape!): "if they find the girl, you are looking at 15 years in prison! What did he mean by that? That Joran is "innocent" or "guilty" of something that will send him behind bars for so many years?

Can this big-mouthed lawyer understand this? Or does he only want to impose his street style here too?

Attacking my evidence based on real facts won't help his client, and if he doesn't stop painting Joran like an angel, I'll find myself forced to publish everything we have found out about him since he was 8 years old! He is certainly no "angel", believe me!

 Let Tacopina understand once and for all that I have 33 years of journalism in Aruba behind me, and that if the American media ask for my comments, it is because they are aware that I know more than Tacopina thinks! Could he possibly be trying to break my credibility with the American People, by his clownish acts on TV?

I've always spoken the truth to them! I have nothing to hide from anyone. My relationship with David Kock and Ronny Wix, the defense lawyers for the Kalpoe brothers is excellent! They have the professional ethics that Tacopina lacks and a good sense in the practice of law, of that I'm sure!

 In my opinion, Paulus committed a critical error when he hired Tacopina to defend Joran, because he doesn't know our environment, he is not up-to-date directly on what happened to Natalee, and all his "knowledge" seems to come from what he has read about the case. I'm sure he doesn't have half of the documents that DIARIO has.

 Furthermore, we have additional documents that no other media can even dream of having, and that's because we are serious journalists that respect authorities and cooperate with them when asked to do so.

 I've said on Greta's show that the three suspects know very well what happened to Natalee, because they were the last ones that were with her on the night of her disappearance. Forget about the tales that from Carlos and Charlies they left her at the Holiday Inn or at the beach close to the Marriott! The story about going behind the Lighthouse to see sharks also leaves lots of doubts.

There are contradicting testimonies from Joran, Deepak and Satish! Joran said that they went to his apartment from Carlos and Charlies; the Kalpoe brothers have completely denied that statement. They have declared to the police that they didn't go to that apartment! Which party is telling the truth?

And Joran declared that Deepak picked him up at the beach, but Deepak denied that allegation. And then Joran said it was Satish that picked him up! But Satish also denied that he picked him up! The big question Tacopina has to answer is: How did Joran get back home that night? Did he walk? Did Paulus pick him up? Or was there someone else?

And can Tacopina explain to us how his client did the miracle of letting his shoes grow from size 11 to size 14 in one night?

These are some of the discrepancies that authorities have been investigating again, because they don't make any sense!

For instance, what was the real relationship between Joran and Koen? Why did he leave the island one or two days after Natalee disappeared? Why, when Art Wood and Dave, Natalee's father, asked authorities to interrogate him, it wasn't done? Why hasn't he been interrogated so far? My reliable sources tell me that Koen knows exactly what happened that night!

 If Tacopina thinks that we're not aware of ALL the details of this case, he is badly mistaken! The truth is that we honor our word and will not reveal what we know from our police and judicial sources when asked not to do so! What is said to us in trust will never be betrayed, because then we would be betraying our principles!

 I hope this case goes to Court as soon as possible, and if Joran, Deepak and Satish are innocent, they will be cleared by the judge. And if one or more are guilty, this also will be determined by the evidence presented to the presiding Judge.

 My advice to Tacopina? Stay in the US! Your presence in Aruba will only cause more harm to Joran! Believe me!     


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Magnolia on November 30, 2007, 09:50:07 PM
Greta is way overdue to have John Q Kelly on her program to offset Joe T.  She has had Joe T on ten times since JQK at least that I have seen.

I hope that she does have John Q. Kelly on and that he doesn't get all
dressed up.  I want you all to see how pretty he looks in jeans and a blue
Ralph Lauren shirt with his hair all windblown.  He is very tall.  The man is
made for casual wear.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: robots on November 30, 2007, 09:50:26 PM
perhaps the K2 know they are going to trial

maybe it is like here in the USA

if you are in trouble with the law - like OJ simpson
he is going to trial but there is not enough to justify having him sit in jail at the moment


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on November 30, 2007, 09:50:57 PM
THANK YOU DANA!!

Jossy Mansur is one class act.  He is the ONLY Aruban who is in a position to make a difference that has been there for the family since day one.

Janet

++++++++++++++++++


BETH TWITTY
'Rita Cosby Live & Direct'
September 14, 2005


TWITTY: Well, you know, I‘ll be forever grateful for Jossy Mansur, who is there. And he has been so instrumental. And he‘s just a hero to all of us. And, you know, he‘s my only hope on the island. And we‘ll be forever grateful to him.


DAVE HOLLOWAY
Dana Pretzer Show
September 8, 2006


HOLLOWAY: Jossy has been very helpful to try to find the truth, the fact he lives in Aruba and publishes a newspaper, they're attacking him because he's looking for-- fighting for-- the truth. That’s what a good journalist does--He's going to go after the people, regardless, and try to find the truth


STEVE HOLLOWAY
Scared Monkey - FP Comments
April 6, 2007

 
Comment #20 ... I think he is a good man looking for the truth. He will not let them push him around. This is his home and is probably sick of the corruption that happens every day on such a large scale on such a small island.
Comment by Steve Holloway | April 6, 2007, 1:02 pm


JUG TWITTY
Scared Monkey - FPComments
December 5, 2005


Comment #6 ... THANK YOU JOSSY I DON’T KNOW HOW YOU DO IT BUT YOU HAVE BEEN THERE FOR US FROM THE BEGENNING AND THE PEOPLE OF ARUBA SHOULD BE PROUD OF YOU.
Comment by JUG TWITTY | December 5, 2006, 10:57 am


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: klaasend on November 30, 2007, 09:51:14 PM
******* - I already posted that a few pages back.  Do I get a hat tip too?  lol  :lol:

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2405.msg309850#msg309850

Edited to add:  More than a few pages back, actually on page 2 of this thread


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Observer on November 30, 2007, 09:53:03 PM
******* - I already posted that a few pages back.  Do I get a hat tip too?  lol  :lol:

Now that I read the whole thing I realized it was already posted  :lol:

It deserves to be posted twice  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: mishy on November 30, 2007, 09:53:26 PM
Greta is way overdue to have John Q Kelly on her program to offset Joe T.  She has had Joe T on ten times since JQK at least that I have seen.

I hope that she does have John Q. Kelly on and that he doesn't get all
dressed up.  I want you all to see how pretty he looks in jeans and a blue
Ralph Lauren shirt with his hair all windblown.  He is very tall.  The man is
made for casual wear.



 :lol: :lol: :lol: :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: klaasend on November 30, 2007, 09:55:09 PM
TIM MILLER up next on Dana Pretzer


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on November 30, 2007, 09:55:55 PM
LOL.  Dana just suggested we boycott show that have Joe T. on as a guest.  Great idea!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: mishy on November 30, 2007, 09:58:05 PM
Greta is way overdue to have John Q Kelly on her program to offset Joe T.  She has had Joe T on ten times since JQK at least that I have seen.

I hope that she does have John Q. Kelly on and that he doesn't get all
dressed up.  I want you all to see how pretty he looks in jeans and a blue
Ralph Lauren shirt with his hair all windblown.  He is very tall.  The man is
made for casual wear.



 :lol: :lol: :lol: :wink:

Hi, I'm just posting this b/c I noticed the last couple of times I've quoted and posted, my quotes got all messed up. This is just a test...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: mishy on November 30, 2007, 09:59:18 PM
Hey Klaas, it used to never do this. Is there a setting I can adjust or can you help? TIA!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on November 30, 2007, 10:00:45 PM
******* - I already posted that a few pages back.  Do I get a hat tip too?  lol  :lol:

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2405.msg309850#msg309850

Edited to add:  More than a few pages back, actually on page 2 of this thread

You both done good ... as usual.  :wink:

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: San on November 30, 2007, 10:02:18 PM
What is so absurd is what in the hell were the Kalpoe's doing there at all? They weren't there to just drive Joran around

What were the Kalpoe's doing there at all?

Accident my ass

They seem to be focusing on a lessor charge on the Kalpoes.  Being charged with the disposal of a body.  That seems not to be a crime in Aruba.  I would like to know why.  Is this the only charge they will charge them with if this goes to trial.  Are we suppose to forget the Jaime Skeeters tape where Deepak says they all had sex with Natalee.

It is my opinion they are portraying the Kalpoes to be saints.  I believe they are doing this because they were of age when this crime happened and they would get more time than Joran.  So now let's just charge them with body disposal and we will try and charge Joran with and accidental death.  How many years would Joran get if he was to be found guilty of a crime like this.  Let's remember he was the only one underage and the focus is accidental.  Wouldn't 4-5 years be an easier sentence than 15 years.  Are they trying to make everyone happy.  Find them guilty but they will serve less time and this would also shut the Americans up because we will feel justice was done.

Justice will not be done until the truth and only the truth comes out.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tylergal on November 30, 2007, 10:02:49 PM
Fox update..Interview with Tito and new greaseball attorney representing Tacos  Law firm

http://youtube.com/watch?v=xT1e6ipPFlY


Tito performing his rare blend of Papiajivehonkingenglesio.


Lol....thanks day, I really needed that chuckle...it helped. :smt052

You know what, Nutt, an old man used to tell me when I was quite young (most of the time mad at my husband because he had to work every holiday) and other people had their husbands home --- he would say, "the sun don't shine up the same dog's ass every morning."   Just wait.  Every dog his/her day.  It's coming.

Tyler, that is a quote my father used to say as well.  The last time he used it was when my Niece's team had lost a game, and she was depressed. She was about 13 at the time.   She quoted him in her speech when she became an all American  in collegefor the third time, and everyone in the audience broke up laughing. She was referring to the fact that her college team had been defeated in the playoffs after having won the previous year.  Thanks for the memory.  But now I am sad for not having him here!  Yes,  he was from Georgia!

Isn't that funny, how much we all hear as children that is like because our parents, grandparents, friends, neighbors were all connected when this was a small community and not a huge country. My grandfather was from Virginia but he died in Georgia.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Observer on November 30, 2007, 10:03:40 PM
It is absolutely ridiculous whats happening with Joe Tacopina on all these news stations..I agree with Dana as Tacopina should be Boycotted as well as Aruba!

Dana is funny as heck tonight describing Tacopina..Taco says his Blood gets boiling and says he's mad as hell..Like the charlie Brown cartoon..Bla Bla Bla Bla.. :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: klaasend on November 30, 2007, 10:04:26 PM
Hey Klaas, it used to never do this. Is there a setting I can adjust or can you help? TIA!

You just need to make sure you "space" down a couple time AFTER you see the "end quote".  I don't think it has anything to do with any settings.  It's user error, LOL  :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Frank on November 30, 2007, 10:05:22 PM
 destroying evidence, lying, obstruction of justice I guess aren't crimes in Aruba either.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Frank on November 30, 2007, 10:14:34 PM
What has Fox become, a Horror channel?

We get Joran, tacopina and Hildebeast 24/7?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: klaasend on November 30, 2007, 10:17:11 PM
RED on Dana:  If they (Aruba) screws up this time watch out.

In other words, if they had bad reputation before it will be much worse.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on November 30, 2007, 10:22:41 PM
Great comments by Red.  Keep things in perspective as far as news coverage.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Leslie on November 30, 2007, 10:23:30 PM
spelling mistake:
Natalee Hoolloway Investigation: Aruban Judge Orders Kalpoe Brothers to be Released
Nov 30, 2007 7:24:00 PM


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: klaasend on November 30, 2007, 10:24:36 PM
RED - regarding the search.  They are optimistic, if she is there they will find her.  7-10 days to get there.  They will be there at least 2 weeks working 24/7.

We are looking forward to reporting on it and will have AUDIO files from the ship as things are happening.

Tim will be flying down once the boat gets there.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: San on November 30, 2007, 10:25:11 PM
Greta said it almost seems wreckless what happened with Mos.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: AZSunny on November 30, 2007, 10:25:47 PM
How I wish that Tim and the ships were there right now and searching those waters.  We have a week or so to wait till then.  I think  I understood that it would be about a weeks journey to get there.  We need their information and findings so much right now. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tylergal on November 30, 2007, 10:26:27 PM
Greta said it almost seems wreckless what happened with Mos.

Well, her mouth looks like a shirt that had a wreck with a wringer washer.  So there, Greta! 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: San on November 30, 2007, 10:26:55 PM
Chris Lejuez (SP) said the punishment for the disposal of a body and evidence in Aruba is a maximum of 3 years.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: WhiskeyGirl on November 30, 2007, 10:27:05 PM
What has Fox become, a Horror channel?

We get Joran, tacopina and Hildebeast 24/7?

In a strange twist...I wonder if promoting the angle of the injustice with regards to suspects will backfire?

Will people think 'WTF' - what's wrong with that place?

First a girl goes missing, and they arrest two innocent black men, and 'WTF' now they're going after innocent boys...WTF is going on down there?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: memphis on November 30, 2007, 10:28:48 PM
Greta is way overdue to have John Q Kelly on her program to offset Joe T.  She has had Joe T on ten times since JQK at least that I have seen.

Does anyone know who she will have from Aruba?  I wonder if she now understands that the Kalpoes were not released from being suspects just from PRETRIAL detention.

I like that word pretrial as it indicates that a trial is in the works.

I wonder, if a suspect leave the country, and no trial is held, does that mean a crime has not happened?


LOL at WhiskyGirl. You've been cracking me up tonight.  :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Puzzler on November 30, 2007, 10:29:40 PM
perhaps the K2 know they are going to trial

maybe it is like here in the USA

if you are in trouble with the law - like OJ simpson
he is going to trial but there is not enough to justify having him sit in jail at the moment


good analogy....Mos said in today's interview:  not enough material to keep them on the counts that we think are valid in this case; also the judge said there is serious material against these two suspects pertaining to much lessor forms of crime, such as mak a body dissapear - those are crimes that you cannot be kept in pre-trial detention.

So...OJ's out on bail - Aruba law doesn't have bail - you're either in detention for very serious crimes or you are not in detention for lessor forms of crime - both ways talking about "pre-trial".   

IMO they're going to trial.


.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: klaasend on November 30, 2007, 10:29:49 PM
EXCELLENT SHOW DANA!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Stella on November 30, 2007, 10:30:20 PM
Chris Lejezue (SP) said the punishment for the disposal of a body and evidence in Aruba is a maximum of 3 years.

Apparently hiding a body & covering up murder isn't considered a crime - it's considered your civic duty if you live in Aruba.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on November 30, 2007, 10:30:20 PM
destroying evidence, lying, obstruction of justice  I guess aren't crimes in Aruba either.

WOW!!!

Frank ... I just figured out why Paulus van der Sloot was not detained for his role in disposing of Natalee's remains along with Joran, Deepak and Satish.  His relationship to the suspect is "a family member in the first degree" and ... therefore ... according to Aruban law is cannot be charged with obstruction of justice.  At least according to Arlene Ellis-Schipper.   :roll:

In the Natalee Holloway case ... The spirit of Dutch law has been manipulated/ disregarded time and time again in favor of the suspects and ... has worked against the victim time and time again.

Janet

++++++++++++++++++

Arlene Ellis-Schipper
'The Abrams Report'
June 30, 2005


ARLENE ELLIS-SCHIPPER, ARUBAN ATTORNEY: Well basically obstruction of justice is a criminal offense in our criminal code. However, there is an exoneration for family members in the first degree. So in the case of Mr. Van der Sloot it would not apply.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: kathyn2 on November 30, 2007, 10:34:32 PM
Taco or his croney in Aruba filing to get Joran out of jail first thing monday morning.   Not waiting for him to get out on a friday.  Because its nonsense and no new evidence (according to taco).


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on November 30, 2007, 10:36:13 PM
Great show, Dana.  Thanks for having Jossy on and your comments about Joe T. are right on the mark.  Sorry you couldn't get Tim on, but Red always does a great job speaking out for Natalee.  Hopefully TES will be successful!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on November 30, 2007, 10:38:42 PM
Taco or his croney in Aruba filing to get Joran out of jail first thing monday morning.   Not waiting for him to get out on a friday.  Because its nonsense and no new evidence (according to taco).

Tacoboy is a disgrace.  Surely he can't file anything in Aruba.  He would have to have one of Joran's Aruban attoneys fil for that.  That man makes me sick.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: memphis on November 30, 2007, 10:39:04 PM
What is so absurd is what in the hell were the Kalpoe's doing there at all? They weren't there to just drive Joran around

What were the Kalpoe's doing there at all?

Accident my ass

They seem to be focusing on a lessor charge on the Kalpoes.  Being charged with the disposal of a body.  That seems not to be a crime in Aruba.  I would like to know why.  Is this the only charge they will charge them with if this goes to trial.  Are we suppose to forget the Jaime Skeeters tape where Deepak says they all had sex with Natalee.

It is my opinion they are portraying the Kalpoes to be saints.  I believe they are doing this because they were of age when this crime happened and they would get more time than Joran.  So now let's just charge them with body disposal and we will try and charge Joran with and accidental death.  How many years would Joran get if he was to be found guilty of a crime like this.  Let's remember he was the only one underage and the focus is accidental.  Wouldn't 4-5 years be an easier sentence than 15 years.  Are they trying to make everyone happy.  Find them guilty but they will serve less time and this would also shut the Americans up because we will feel justice was done.

Justice will not be done until the truth and only the truth comes out.

All evening I've been thinking, in regards to the Kalpoes, what about kidnapping? What about rape? We KNOW they are more involved than just body disposal or covering for Joran. Don't get confused people.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Observer on November 30, 2007, 10:39:48 PM
just read on Dutch news media sources, the DA is going to appeal the decision of the judge today.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Puzzler on November 30, 2007, 10:39:56 PM
Interesting...Mos also said this afternoon that he sees the same judge in the same position with the other suspect and same evidence the judge kept the suspect over for 8 more days; Mos thought the judge would keep the 2 suspects an additional 8 days, too.  Mos said the judge must see differences between the evidence looking at it for the 1 suspect vs. looking at it for the 2 suspects.

Hmmm....same evidence, same judge, different opinions


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: memphis on November 30, 2007, 10:41:33 PM
It is absolutely ridiculous whats happening with Joe Tacopina on all these news stations..I agree with Dana as Tacopina should be Boycotted as well as Aruba!

Dana is funny as heck tonight describing Tacopina..Taco says his Blood gets boiling and says he's mad as hell..Like the charlie Brown cartoon..Bla Bla Bla Bla.. :lol:

Let's do it! Let's boycott any show with JoeT. Let's make it known to Fox, etc.  :smt096 :smt077


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: klaasend on November 30, 2007, 10:43:15 PM
just read on Dutch news media sources, the DA is going to appeal the decision of the judge today.

English translation:  MOS is going to appeal


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tylergal on November 30, 2007, 10:43:51 PM
What is so absurd is what in the hell were the Kalpoe's doing there at all? They weren't there to just drive Joran around

What were the Kalpoe's doing there at all?

Accident my ass

They seem to be focusing on a lessor charge on the Kalpoes.  Being charged with the disposal of a body.  That seems not to be a crime in Aruba.  I would like to know why.  Is this the only charge they will charge them with if this goes to trial.  Are we suppose to forget the Jaime Skeeters tape where Deepak says they all had sex with Natalee.

It is my opinion they are portraying the Kalpoes to be saints.  I believe they are doing this because they were of age when this crime happened and they would get more time than Joran.  So now let's just charge them with body disposal and we will try and charge Joran with and accidental death.  How many years would Joran get if he was to be found guilty of a crime like this.  Let's remember he was the only one underage and the focus is accidental.  Wouldn't 4-5 years be an easier sentence than 15 years.  Are they trying to make everyone happy.  Find them guilty but they will serve less time and this would also shut the Americans up because we will feel justice was done.

Justice will not be done until the truth and only the truth comes out.

All evening I've been thinking, in regards to the Kalpoes, what about kidnapping? What about rape? We KNOW they are more involved than just body disposal or covering for Joran. Don't get confused people.

How do we know that?  I have always thought the main culprit was Joran and he just called on his "slaves" to clean up the blood and guts after he lost that Anita temper and killed Natalee because he could not have his way with her.  She did not die accidentally.  There is a reason they did not want her body found and it was not sex and drugs.  They could have gotten around that by saying she drugged herself, they had sex with her and it was just her word against theirs.  No, there was something "bad happened," something bad that left marks on her body necessitating a disappearance of her from the face of the earth so that hot-tempered, fat Joran would be safe and free.  I hope he has Bubba for breakfast and supper and a midnight snack.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: AZSunny on November 30, 2007, 10:44:20 PM
Taco or his croney in Aruba filing to get Joran out of jail first thing monday morning.   Not waiting for him to get out on a friday.  Because its nonsense and no new evidence (according to taco).

Tacoboy is a disgrace.  Surely he can't file anything in Aruba.  He would have to have one of Joran's Aruban attoneys fil for that.  That man makes me sick.

Yes!  and I just emailed that to greta.  I wish everyone would do that and tell her we are not accepting this crap. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Magnolia on November 30, 2007, 10:45:38 PM
Interesting...Mos also said this afternoon that he sees the same judge in the same position with the other suspect and same evidence the judge kept the suspect over for 8 more days; Mos thought the judge would keep the 2 suspects an additional 8 days, too.  Mos said the judge must see differences between the evidence looking at it for the 1 suspect vs. looking at it for the 2 suspects.

Hmmm....same evidence, same judge, different opinions


I thought it was said earlier that there are two different judges.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: robots on November 30, 2007, 10:45:59 PM
crapopina is in for a surprise

if the k2 brothers are thought to have been involved with moving a body
then what the hell is he thinking that joran had no part in this at all ????

JOE, STHU

gessssssssssssssssh,

if K2 get 3 years for hiding a body and thats the law - i can live with that
i think it sucks but i can live with that

GO GET JORAN


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: klaasend on November 30, 2007, 10:46:35 PM
Interesting...Mos also said this afternoon that he sees the same judge in the same position with the other suspect and same evidence the judge kept the suspect over for 8 more days; Mos thought the judge would keep the 2 suspects an additional 8 days, too.  Mos said the judge must see differences between the evidence looking at it for the 1 suspect vs. looking at it for the 2 suspects.

Hmmm....same evidence, same judge, different opinions


I thought it was said earlier that there are two different judges.

Magnolia - I heard the same, 2 different judges


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Leslie on November 30, 2007, 10:47:44 PM
O/T Stacy Peterson case.
Am I losing my mind or my hearing?  I thought Mark Furhman started his report by saying that 2 men entered the donut shop, sat down at the table and neither one left the table until they both got up and walked out.  Later, he changed his story to say that there is a part of the tape where there is one man sitting at the table.   Did anyone hear the same thing?    


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tylergal on November 30, 2007, 10:47:44 PM
Interesting...Mos also said this afternoon that he sees the same judge in the same position with the other suspect and same evidence the judge kept the suspect over for 8 more days; Mos thought the judge would keep the 2 suspects an additional 8 days, too.  Mos said the judge must see differences between the evidence looking at it for the 1 suspect vs. looking at it for the 2 suspects.

Hmmm....same evidence, same judge, different opinions


I thought it was said earlier that there are two different judges.

Magnolia - I heard the same, 2 different judges

yes.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tylergal on November 30, 2007, 10:50:17 PM
I cannot bear the thought of that big ugly, pimply faced, big-busted, hog legged Joran and what he did to Natalee.  It makes me despise him so much and the thought of that sweaty daddy of his, who might be necrophiliac for all we know.  They may have an obsession about having sex with corpses.  We don't know what kind of sick people they are but they look dreadfully mentally deranged.  Joran's eyes look evil and one of them is bigger than the other, almost like a cyclops head.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: San on November 30, 2007, 10:50:42 PM
O/T Stacy Peterson case.
Am I losing my mind or my hearing?  I thought Mark Furhman started his report by saying that 2 men entered the donut shop, sat down at the table and neither one left the table until they both got up and walked out.  Later, he changed his story to say that there is a part of the tape where there is one man sitting at the table.   Did anyone hear the same thing?    


Yes I heard that.  Then Greta specifically asked him if one got up and walked away and he said yes.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on November 30, 2007, 10:54:43 PM
Chris Lejuez (SP) said the punishment for the disposal of a body and evidence in Aruba is a maximum of 3 years.


Quite the disciplinarians aren't they San, those Dutch? I don't think I've ever seen a more limp wristed bunch of laws. It is no wonder they can't police themselves. Dutch laws are for the protectiuon of the Dutch only, screw the rest.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: memphis on November 30, 2007, 10:58:23 PM
How do we know that?  I have always thought the main culprit was Joran and he just called on his "slaves" to clean up the blood and guts after he lost that Anita temper and killed Natalee because he could not have his way with her.  She did not die accidentally.  There is a reason they did not want her body found and it was not sex and drugs.  They could have gotten around that by saying she drugged herself, they had sex with her and it was just her word against theirs.  No, there was something "bad happened," something bad that left marks on her body necessitating a disappearance of her from the face of the earth so that hot-tempered, fat Joran would be safe and free.  I hope he has Bubba for breakfast and supper and a midnight snack.

Tylergal, I agree that Joran killed her - absolutely agree. No doubt in my mind. However, while the Kalpoes (either one or both) may not be guilty of murder, or Voluntary Manslaughter, they are guilty of being part of the kidnapping of Natalee. They went to C&C's with Joran. They provided the car (we think), Deepak was driving the vehicle with Loco Stephy and the other two (can't remember their names), Deepak was named in Jossy's "Pimp" list, at least Deepak was involved in some of the "20 times". Of course this is my opinion, but I believe Deepak was part of the drugging, kidnapping and raping. It's a bunch of bull that he is only guilty of disposing of a body. I doubt he was even a part of that.

As I said - Just my opinion.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on November 30, 2007, 11:00:13 PM
destroying evidence, lying, obstruction of justice I guess aren't crimes in Aruba either.

The much heralded Dutch system is playing itself out on the world stage for the broken down, washed up, inneffective piece of crap that it is.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Observer on November 30, 2007, 11:01:31 PM
Chris Lejuez (SP) said the punishment for the disposal of a body and evidence in Aruba is a maximum of 3 years.


Quite the disciplinarians aren't they San, those Dutch? I don't think I've ever seen a more limp wristed bunch of laws. It is no wonder they can't police themselves.

We saw that with the murder,mutilation and burning of Pitbull. 3 out of 4 of the convicted got less than 3 years. But they also appealed..For all we know they could be free. :-?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: San on November 30, 2007, 11:06:22 PM
How do we know that?  I have always thought the main culprit was Joran and he just called on his "slaves" to clean up the blood and guts after he lost that Anita temper and killed Natalee because he could not have his way with her.  She did not die accidentally.  There is a reason they did not want her body found and it was not sex and drugs.  They could have gotten around that by saying she drugged herself, they had sex with her and it was just her word against theirs.  No, there was something "bad happened," something bad that left marks on her body necessitating a disappearance of her from the face of the earth so that hot-tempered, fat Joran would be safe and free.  I hope he has Bubba for breakfast and supper and a midnight snack.

Tylergal, I agree that Joran killed her - absolutely agree. No doubt in my mind. However, while the Kalpoes (either one or both) may not be guilty of murder, or Voluntary Manslaughter, they are guilty of being part of the kidnapping of Natalee. They went to C&C's with Joran. They provided the car (we think), Deepak was driving the vehicle with Loco Stephy and the other two (can't remember their names), Deepak was named in Jossy's "Pimp" list, at least Deepak was involved in some of the "20 times". Of course this is my opinion, but I believe Deepak was part of the drugging, kidnapping and raping. It's a bunch of bull that he is only guilty of disposing of a body. I doubt he was even a part of that.

As I said - Just my opinion.

I agree Memphis.  Deepak is guilty of drugging, kidnapping and raping.  I am disgusted that they seem to be focusing on only the body disposal.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on November 30, 2007, 11:08:16 PM
Chris Lejuez (SP) said the punishment for the disposal of a body and evidence in Aruba is a maximum of 3 years.


Quite the disciplinarians aren't they San, those Dutch? I don't think I've ever seen a more limp wristed bunch of laws. It is no wonder they can't police themselves.

We saw that with the murder,mutilation and burning of Pitbull. 3 out of 4 of the convicted got less than 3 years. But they also appealed..For all we know they could be free. :-?


Spineless. They have no values. If somebody gets killed they think it's just something that it's too late to do anything about. Life goes on.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Frank on November 30, 2007, 11:08:55 PM
DATE: Nov 30, 20:01

By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

ORANJESTAD, Aruba – Two brothers re-arrested last week as suspects in the disappearance of American teenager Natalee Holloway will be released from jail, a prosecutor said Friday.

The two brothers, Satish and Deepak Kalpoe, will be released by Saturday, prosecutor Dop Kruimel said.

“We have three days to launch an appeal, but we have to think about it,” Kruimel said.

The prosecutor corrected a statement made earlier by Vinda de Sousa, a lawyer for Dave Holloway, Natalee’s father, who said they had already been released due to lack of evidence.

Their release will mark the third time that the brothers have been arrested and later released in the case. Both have denied having any role in her disappearance.

They and a third suspect who remains in jail, Joran van der Sloot, were the last known people to see Holloway alive before she vanished on May 30, 2005, hours before she was scheduled to return home to Alabama with fellow high school classmates celebrating their graduation. She was 18 at the time.

The three suspects were re-arrested on Nov. 21 on suspicion of involvement in Holloway’s death. Authorities said they had “new incriminating evidence, but defence lawyers had complained that the new material amounted to little more than misunderstandings in the suspects’ recorded conversations.

Van der Sloot’s mother said Friday that she was happy for the Kalpoe brothers but did not whether the rulings mean anything for her son’s case.

“I’m happy that something is happening,” she said.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Observer on November 30, 2007, 11:11:36 PM
On The Record Nov 30th 2007


Part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6JM70cqUL5A

Part 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iQCD3qInI5A


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on November 30, 2007, 11:14:32 PM
All evening I've been thinking, in regards to the Kalpoes, what about kidnapping? What about rape? We KNOW they are more involved than just body disposal or covering for Joran. Don't get confused people.


Memphis, good point. The Kalpoes provided Joran the means to kill. The Kaploes are kidnappers. They are enablers who participated in Joran's plan. It all goes back to their worthless view of society. They are defeatists, futilists, they place no value on life.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Puzzler on November 30, 2007, 11:19:31 PM
Interesting...Mos also said this afternoon that he sees the same judge in the same position with the other suspect and same evidence the judge kept the suspect over for 8 more days; Mos thought the judge would keep the 2 suspects an additional 8 days, too.  Mos said the judge must see differences between the evidence looking at it for the 1 suspect vs. looking at it for the 2 suspects.

Hmmm....same evidence, same judge, different opinions


I thought it was said earlier that there are two different judges.

http://tinyurl.com/2287fj

Here's where I heard it (close to the end).  Maybe you can listen to it and see if you hear the same thing that I "think" I heard.  I listened to it two times, but Mos does have a little difficulty with some expressions (or I have difficulty understanding Mos  :).  If you get a chance to listen to it, please let me know what you think.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Puzzler on November 30, 2007, 11:21:16 PM
All evening I've been thinking, in regards to the Kalpoes, what about kidnapping? What about rape? We KNOW they are more involved than just body disposal or covering for Joran. Don't get confused people.


Memphis, good point. The Kalpoes provided Joran the means to kill. The Kaploes are kidnappers. They are enablers who participated in Joran's plan. It all goes back to their worthless view of society. They are defeatists, futilists, they place no value on life.


I guess kidnapping, drugging and raping are not "serious crimes" in Aruba.


.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: sb on November 30, 2007, 11:22:12 PM
For some reason I am actually encouraged by where we are right now.

Already it has gotten out through the investigation that the Kalpoes went home and that Deepak came back at approx. 3 AM, but Satish didn't. This is in itself an indication that:

1. The crime cannot be pinned on the K2 (to deflect from Joran)
2. Their involvement MAY... MAY... have been less in the actual crime where Natalee died.
3. Just the fact that we have a little bit of "timeline" in focus now after so long wondering When, Where, Yada, Yada is a positive. It shows that the investigation is turning up SOMETHING.

IMO this development today puts Joran MORE on the hotseat. The Judge has declared that a manslaughter-murder has taken place and that K2 likely didn't actually do it themselves. So much for taco-boy's whitewash attempts. By process of elimination, there's only one other person who was with Natalee and he's got some 'splainin' to do.

It would be interesting to know if BAIL would be allowed in the US for the "lesser" charges which the judge clearly believes the K2 are going to be up for. Ain't no one skated today. I am not sure if they would have been kept in custody here in this country for whatever it was they did in rendering help. 

I am thinking that Satish may be looking a little better now.

It is obvious now that Joran's crimes will need to be proven now FIRST, and then the K2's activities will be better understood. The Judge is basing their amount of guilt on what Joran did, and how much they helped him after the fact. I think that's significant.

I am concerned that we (with the evidence as it stands now) are not so far able to get to the underlying crime of drugging/rape at this point but I think it can come out if the prosecutor stays at Joran HARD. Proving K2 complicity in THAT aspect (in other words, the planning of the crime) is still a tough nut to crack. But hey, the refugees don't care that much about K2 anyway, they are all worried about Joran. They need to be, IMO.

At least right now, we are starting to get some idea of what happened to Natalee and she may be found. We didn't have that a week ago.

Let Us Continue.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: memphis on November 30, 2007, 11:23:17 PM
I am hopeful. Hope is wonderful. I mean that.

I do, however, think that maybe we should be proactive, somehow. I don't know how or what we can do, but I hope Natalee's Freebirds are watching carefully.

I'm telling you that most of the world is not aware that there was a coverup in Aruba. Those on the net know it, but most do not. I have never heard MSM allude to a coverup or corruption. I cannot fathom how any honest person could investigate this case and not see the corruption. I cannot fathom how anyone could investigate this case and not have enough evidence to even hold Deepak and Satish. If they close this case saying that there wasn't enough evidence to prosecute, where is the outcry going to come from? It's going to be us - those who have followed the case on the internet. We need to somehow make our voice heard now.

We, as a group, are so desperate for a resolution, that I'm afraid we are already allowing our minds to be twisted. Maybe this is what we have all hoped for, but if it isn't, maybe we need to have some kind of a plan. That's all I'm saying.

I believe that God is in control. I believe that those in Aruba who think they are so powerful are just puppets on His string. I also believe that there will ultimately be justice. However, I just think that it is wise to keep our eyes wide open and maybe try to have some type of plan - to be proactive.





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: islanders on November 30, 2007, 11:27:00 PM
Why listen to Greta? She acts like she is part of the defense team of low life.

Why does she support Joran and Paulus when they lied to the police the next day Natalee was missing?

Now she attacks Hans Mos at the pre-trial formalities.

When I see Gretta I change the channel.

   


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 30, 2007, 11:28:03 PM
All evening I've been thinking, in regards to the Kalpoes, what about kidnapping? What about rape? We KNOW they are more involved than just body disposal or covering for Joran. Don't get confused people.


Memphis, good point. The Kalpoes provided Joran the means to kill. The Kaploes are kidnappers. They are enablers who participated in Joran's plan. It all goes back to their worthless view of society. They are defeatists, futilists, they place no value on life.


I guess kidnapping, drugging and raping are not "serious crimes" in Aruba.


.

In addition to the above, and in my view perhaps the most serious ( outside of causing her death ) is that the Kalpoe's are GUILTY of witholding information, perpetuating information, and creating information for the purpose of OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE in this case. If they would tell the truth, the guilty party/parties would be identified as the words left their stinking mouths. They sure as hell know what happened that night.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on November 30, 2007, 11:28:05 PM
I am hopeful. Hope is wonderful. I mean that.

I do, however, think that maybe we should be proactive, somehow. I don't know how or what we can do, but I hope Natalee's Freebirds are watching carefully.

I'm telling you that most of the world is not aware that there was a coverup in Aruba. Those on the net know it, but most do not. I have never heard MSM allude to a coverup or corruption. I cannot fathom how any honest person could investigate this case and not see the corruption. I cannot fathom how anyone could investigate this case and not have enough evidence to even hold Deepak and Satish. If they close this case saying that there wasn't enough evidence to prosecute, where is the outcry going to come from? It's going to be us - those who have followed the case on the internet. We need to somehow make our voice heard now.

We, as a group, are so desperate for a resolution, that I'm afraid we are already allowing our minds to be twisted. Maybe this is what we have all hoped for, but if it isn't, maybe we need to have some kind of a plan. That's all I'm saying.

I believe that God is in control. I believe that those in Aruba who think they are so powerful are just puppets on His string. I also believe that there will ultimately be justice. However, I just think that it is wise to keep our eyes wide open and maybe try to have some type of plan - to be proactive.


Thanks you memphis.

The words of your post reflect my sentiments exactly.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: memphis on November 30, 2007, 11:34:04 PM
I agree Memphis.  Deepak is guilty of drugging, kidnapping and raping.  I am disgusted that they seem to be focusing on only the body disposal.

No, no! I agree with you!  :lol:
 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on November 30, 2007, 11:35:03 PM

Tylergal, I agree that Joran killed her - absolutely agree. No doubt in my mind. However, while the Kalpoes (either one or both) may not be guilty of murder, or Voluntary Manslaughter, they are guilty of being part of the kidnapping of Natalee. They went to C&C's with Joran. They provided the car (we think), Deepak was driving the vehicle with Loco Stephy and the other two (can't remember their names), Deepak was named in Jossy's "Pimp" list, at least Deepak was involved in some of the "20 times". Of course this is my opinion, but I believe Deepak was part of the drugging, kidnapping and raping. It's a bunch of bull that he is only guilty of disposing of a body. I doubt he was even a part of that.

As I said - Just my opinion.


... and mine.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 30, 2007, 11:35:06 PM
I am hopeful. Hope is wonderful. I mean that.

I do, however, think that maybe we should be proactive, somehow. I don't know how or what we can do, but I hope Natalee's Freebirds are watching carefully.

I'm telling you that most of the world is not aware that there was a coverup in Aruba. Those on the net know it, but most do not. I have never heard MSM allude to a coverup or corruption. I cannot fathom how any honest person could investigate this case and not see the corruption. I cannot fathom how anyone could investigate this case and not have enough evidence to even hold Deepak and Satish. If they close this case saying that there wasn't enough evidence to prosecute, where is the outcry going to come from? It's going to be us - those who have followed the case on the internet. We need to somehow make our voice heard now.

We, as a group, are so desperate for a resolution, that I'm afraid we are already allowing our minds to be twisted. Maybe this is what we have all hoped for, but if it isn't, maybe we need to have some kind of a plan. That's all I'm saying.

I believe that God is in control. I believe that those in Aruba who think they are so powerful are just puppets on His string. I also believe that there will ultimately be justice. However, I just think that it is wise to keep our eyes wide open and maybe try to have some type of plan - to be proactive.





What can we do to be heard before Joran goes up before the judge? Who can we write, who could we send a petition to vowing to never set foot on the island and do everything in our power to keep all Americans from doing the same, if they turn their back on Natalee?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: memphis on November 30, 2007, 11:38:33 PM
Why listen to Greta? She acts like she is part of the defense team of low life.

Why does she support Joran and Paulus when they lied to the police the next day Natalee was missing?

Now she attacks Hans Mos at the pre-trial formalities.

When I see Gretta I change the channel.

   

So ... let's boycott Greta.  :D  Why not? She has Tacopina on and he is an enemy to our cause. Plus, he insults Jossy. Jossy is our friend.

I say let's boycott Greta and let her know about it.  :D


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on November 30, 2007, 11:45:25 PM
So, now we have to wait for another Pearl Harbor Day for the next bomb to drop....unless Joe T's wish for early dismissal of Joran becomes a reality....very sickening :-x :-? :sad: to think that may happen.

Hope Beth's guardian angel is with her, if she decided to stay on that island.


Title: Q!
Post by: memphis on November 30, 2007, 11:50:46 PM
Janet - my thoughts align with yours. You just verbalize it much better and back everything up. I am so with you.

CBB - I don't know. Everyone has different skills, but I keep thinking about the cable news stations. Why can't we excert some influence over what is reported? Why on earth is Fox still talking to Renfroe. That is obsurd. She is part of the corruption. Is there some way that we can just say, "NO!" to Fox if they continue to use JoeT and Renfroe? Also, why has no one reported about the corruption? That could be a big story.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Frijole on November 30, 2007, 11:55:07 PM
Hi guys... been catching up and I too was upset that the Kalpoe Bros were released today.  It got me thinking... what could the prosecutor be trying to accomplish?

He has more evidence than he's shared.  Why is this?  It's like a game of poker - when to hold and when to fold.  He says he has enough to go to trial.  But he throws out a Dec. 31st deadline.  Why wait?

One answer - what if - what if that wonderful flotilla headed currently to Aruba were successful in recovering Natalee?  Case closed.

I believe he is trying to do the right thing.  I pray I am right.

Hang in there Monkey buddies.. it ain't over til the fat lady sings.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on November 30, 2007, 11:58:12 PM
Hi guys... been catching up and I too was upset that the Kalpoe Bros were released today.  It got me thinking... what could the prosecutor be trying to accomplish?

He has more evidence than he's shared.  Why is this?  It's like a game of poker - when to hold and when to fold.  He says he has enough to go to trial.  But he throws out a Dec. 31st deadline.  Why wait?

One answer - what if - what if that wonderful flotilla headed currently to Aruba were successful in recovering Natalee?  Case closed.

I believe he is trying to do the right thing.  I pray I am right.

Hang in there Monkey buddies.. it ain't over til the fat lady sings.

Nothing like a deadline....12/31/07....hope you are right, Beans.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: sb on November 30, 2007, 11:59:05 PM
I guess there just aren't that many people that Fox CAN talk to down there. Once they play a clip of Jossy, Julia, Tito, and a couple of others, that's all they have. Throw in taco-boy and JQK and about all that's left is to get a comment from Beth or Dave.

I mean, we could have Trapenberg and Arlene and Kock and all the other apologists for Joran, but what good would that do?

And of all the island people, only Jossy is on Beth's side.

Hard to report it down the middle when the scale is tilted so strongly.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 01, 2007, 12:00:05 AM
G'nite monkey friends.  Catch you, later.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: sb on December 01, 2007, 12:02:18 AM
I don't see that 12/31 thing as being a "deadline". I see Mos saying he "hopes" he can make a decision by then.

I may "HOPE" someone sends me a check in the mail for a million bucks but that don't mean it's bound to happen LOL.

We're just gettin' started good here on this go-around.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: memphis on December 01, 2007, 12:03:34 AM
What about the local reporter/newsstation that Magnolia keeps posting?

Is there some way we could throw our support behind her? Could we send them information they might not have?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Port Valerie on December 01, 2007, 12:04:14 AM
I guess there just aren't that many people that Fox CAN talk to down there. Once they play a clip of Jossy, Julia, Tito, and a couple of others, that's all they have. Throw in taco-boy and JQK and about all that's left is to get a comment from Beth or Dave.

I mean, we could have Trapenberg and Arlene and Kock and all the other apologists for Joran, but what good would that do?

And of all the island people, only Jossy is on Beth's side.

Hard to report it down the middle when the scale is tilted so strongly.

Exactly.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: islanders on December 01, 2007, 12:04:36 AM
Why listen to Greta? She acts like she is part of the defense team of low life.

Why does she support Joran and Paulus when they lied to the police the next day Natalee was missing?

Now she attacks Hans Mos at the pre-trial formalities.

When I see Gretta I change the channel.

   

So ... let's boycott Greta.  :D  Why not? She has Tacopina on and he is an enemy to our cause. Plus, he insults Jossy. Jossy is our friend.

I say let's boycott Greta and let her know about it.  :D


I've been boycotting Greta for about two years.  :smt018





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: sb on December 01, 2007, 12:05:14 AM
See y'all tomorrow evening... be a busy one tomorrow...

Keep plugging away, guys.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Frijole on December 01, 2007, 12:08:33 AM
I don't see that 12/31 thing as being a "deadline". I see Mos saying he "hopes" he can make a decision by then.

I may "HOPE" someone sends me a check in the mail for a million bucks but that don't mean it's bound to happen LOL.

We're just gettin' started good here on this go-around.

Didn't mean it to be taken so literal... we're on the same page here - I agree it's a good thing.

I think there is a coordinated effort between the sailing dates, the arrests, etc. and that date is just something that is a part of it. 

If there is any truth in the NE article posted earlier then all of the searches, the tapings/buggings, infiltration - was carefully orchestrated.  The goal - to get evidence and nail the 3 doritos.

Listening to people that have NOTHING TO DO with the case and frankly are misinformed or in some cases doing nothing but trying to put their faces on natl. TV does us no good.  I still care deeply - but I quit running to the TV because they have nothing of value to add.  They just piss me off.  So I read here instead.

Today was disappointing but he'll appeal.  He might have to show his next card.  He certainly seems to have more on the ball than KJ. It will be interesting to see what Dave and Beth say after meeting with him.  THAT interview I'll watch.  :wink:

Keep the faith.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 01, 2007, 12:12:08 AM
I learned of their release late, and as I am back reading, I realize that I'm going through what you guys went through right after you heard it. I'm out of cync. I am extremely angry that they were released, livid that Beth landed on that God Forsaken Island to such news and once again had her hopes dashed, furious that Natalee's remains are somewhere on or around that Island and that her Mother has to travel there where she's hated, heartbroken that Beth and Dave are robbed of even laying their daughter to rest away from that hellhole, sick of thinking about what those bastards did to her and Aruba just turns them loose, and crushed at the thought that Tacky will be the voice America will hear to respond to this turn of events!

Breath, Breath, Breath.............

I do know that truth will come. I do honestly know that. Despite what happened today, I do still believe that Hans Mos is trying. I know that some disagree with me, but I believe the man is putting forth an honest effort. I feared that the corruption on Aruba would thwart his efforts. I will get to optimism and faith. I just have to squelch the anger and hurt for the family first. I do hope that Beth stays. I want the world to see and hear her. I wish her daughter could.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 01, 2007, 12:14:09 AM
Thanks, SB and Frijole.

Thanks, Klaas, for the transcription of the highlights from Jossy.  I know you are tired physically and emotionally.

All we have is faith right now that the man upstairs is going to do the right thing.  We must pray that Mos is guided by a superior power to man and that his decision-making is right.  I think it is.  I think this show today was not totally unexpected.  The man is not braindead.  I think he knew there was a good chance that he could not pin the "death" on the K2.  I think he knows much more than we know.  He might not even be able to charge them with rape.  I suspect they were dropped off at home and Joran used Deepak's car or either Joran picked up one of his family vehicles, possibly the reason Paulus had to go bail him out when he saw "Joran and Natalee."  I just think we need to keep the faith because faith is all we have or that Beth and Dave have. 

Hillary Clinton is on all night tonight.  I think she burned her face really bad in the tanning bed.  Man, that looks like it hurts.  Ouch.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 01, 2007, 12:18:27 AM
Well, I worded that so wrong, I meant to say that Mos is going to be guided by a higher power, that man upstairs who always does what is right in His own time, not ours and I pray that the time that He takes to do that right is soon, but we don't know why things work the way we do. He is in charge.  He has dominion over everything, he even cares for the lowest common denominator in the world, even Julia Renfro and Joran.  He cares because they are His children. He even loves Taco.  That is not to say He approves of what they do but He loves them unconditionally and he loves Beth, Dave, Natalee and in time, He will work His magic.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 01, 2007, 12:27:41 AM
Well, I worded that so wrong, I meant to say that Mos is going to be guided by a higher power, that man upstairs who always does what is right in His own time, not ours and I pray that the time that He takes to do that right is soon, but we don't know why things work the way we do. He is in charge.  He has dominion over everything, he even cares for the lowest common denominator in the world, even Julia Renfro and Joran.  He cares because they are His children. He even loves Taco.  That is not to say He approves of what they do but He loves them unconditionally and he loves Beth, Dave, Natalee and in time, He will work His magic.

Ah, Tyler..................you are the voice that carries the message that I need to hear right now. It resonates with what I know is true even if all else around me is screaming otherwise.

Klaas, thank you for your posts to catch me up. Your patience is overwhelming!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 01, 2007, 12:28:37 AM
Monkeys ... I have appreciated the dialogue tonight very much.

We may have varying perspectives pertaining to certain aspects regarding the happenings of the past week but ... there is a common foundation on the forum ... Justice for Natalee Holloway and ... empathy for her family.

Reading over over recent posts of this thread makes me very thankful to be a member of this forum.

Thanks you Red, Dugga, Klaas and mods ... you are all the greatest!

Well ... youngest son, wife and hubby have been watching a video and eating Chinese Food.  Me ... I spent the good part of the past couple of hours running back and forth to the computer room.  Now that movie is over ... they have all decided that a board game is where it is at.  As far as I am concerning bedtime is where it is at but ...   :wink:

Good Night Monkeys

JUSTICE FOR NATALEE HOLLOWAY!!

Janet
9:30 PM


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: oldfart on December 01, 2007, 12:33:02 AM
OK... Where is ROBOTS to back me up on this..

Disappointed yes.... surprised a little yes..
K's let out because Judge did not see Manslaugher material. ?  Did MOS play all of his cards ?  Aruba law does not allow detention for the crimes that the Judge saw.( JMO)Seems like MOS was a little suprised too.

Now he knows the playing field and rules being used... If Joan is freed.. then I will be more pissed than ever.  TO me the Judge will be saying that they were involved but did not commit the act... So who did ??

I want Natlee returned home... but I also want someone held accoutable for the illegal acts that occurred... from the perps lies to the bars/casinos and the cover up within the Govt and AHTA..   
JMO of course...    2008 will be a better year for us  or a very BAD one for Aruba...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 01, 2007, 12:48:27 AM
OK... Where is ROBOTS to back me up on this..

Disappointed yes.... surprised a little yes..
K's let out because Judge did not see Manslaugher material. ?  Did MOS play all of his cards ?  Aruba law does not allow detention for the crimes that the Judge saw.( JMO)Seems like MOS was a little suprised too.

Now he knows the playing field and rules being used... If Joan is freed.. then I will be more pissed than ever.  TO me the Judge will be saying that they were involved but did not commit the act... So who did ??

I want Natlee returned home... but I also want someone held accoutable for the illegal acts that occurred... from the perps lies to the bars/casinos and the cover up within the Govt and AHTA..   
JMO of course...    2008 will be a better year for us  or a very BAD one for Aruba...  


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 01, 2007, 12:49:44 AM
That just needed repeating, Old Fart!
WELL SAID!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Port Valerie on December 01, 2007, 12:51:33 AM
I'm disappointed in the way things turned out today. I'm encouraged because Mos admits he is disappointed too. To me, that indicates that he is an honest man, not trying to put a good spin on something that is clearly not good from his point of view. We also have Dave Holloway, Tim Miller, Jossy  -- all incredibly honest and trustworthy men -- plus the entire crew and management of the Persistence. It's been an honor to see them work. And Beth and Jug also. Their integrity outweighs all the scrambling scheming low-lifes.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 01, 2007, 01:01:26 AM
Good Point, Valerie.
Hans' reaction was the same as ours...........well, maybe a little less emotional than mine, and a lot more professional, but it was honest disappointment. He just rings true to me, and it's a long way that we've come from the snapshot Aruba gave the world the first time around.

Aruba's teetering on disaster. We'll see which end of the see saw crashes to the ground.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 01, 2007, 01:09:54 AM
Well, the judge did not say that Mos was totally out of order and that he had nothing. Without seeing the actual paers that were presented, its hard to know what to think.
Some nice comments and some food for thought by Tylergal. TY.
ps They had enough to keep Joran until Dec 7. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Port Valerie on December 01, 2007, 01:10:34 AM
Goodnight CBB and all. For tonight at least, all three are still where they belong.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on December 01, 2007, 01:21:02 AM
Taco or his croney in Aruba filing to get Joran out of jail first thing monday morning.   Not waiting for him to get out on a friday.  Because its nonsense and no new evidence (according to taco).

Tacoboy is a disgrace.  Surely he can't file anything in Aruba.  He would have to have one of Joran's Aruban attoneys fil for that.  That man makes me sick.

Yes!  and I just emailed that to greta.  I wish everyone would do that and tell her we are not accepting this crap. 

Lots of drama here at home tonight, so trying to keep up.  But I did get an email sent to Greta too.   Now back to catch up.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on December 01, 2007, 01:27:42 AM
Why listen to Greta? She acts like she is part of the defense team of low life.

Why does she support Joran and Paulus when they lied to the police the next day Natalee was missing?

Now she attacks Hans Mos at the pre-trial formalities.

When I see Gretta I change the channel.

   

I support Greta for the most part.  She was just as shocked and couldn't understand the release of k2's either.  She's been friends with Beth from day one and has helped her more than any other newscaster.  However, I do agree she needs to quit interviewing Taco.  I believe she would interview JQK if/when she has the chance, but may not have it.  He's keeping quiet, cause he knows more than Taco.  She plays the hands that are dealt to her.  She can't control everything.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on December 01, 2007, 01:48:56 AM
Tyler, the voice of reason.  You are so right.  It's not in our hands, it's in the hands of God...  It's not for us to truly judge, though we are human and will react to our emotions.  No matter what,  judgement day will come, whenever that is, but not ours to determine.   We will continue to be here in support, get upset, disagree, etc...  but in the end justice will prevail.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: JuJu on December 01, 2007, 02:01:47 AM
HOW DARE THEY DO THIS TO THE FAMILY......AGAIN!  I HOPE THAT EVERYBODY ON WHOLE DAMN ISLAND STARVES TO DEATH.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Red on December 01, 2007, 02:06:33 AM
Why listen to Greta? She acts like she is part of the defense team of low life.

Why does she support Joran and Paulus when they lied to the police the next day Natalee was missing?

Now she attacks Hans Mos at the pre-trial formalities.

When I see Gretta I change the channel.

   

I support Greta for the most part.  She was just as shocked and couldn't understand the release of k2's either.  She's been friends with Beth from day one and has helped her more than any other newscaster.  However, I do agree she needs to quit interviewing Taco.  I believe she would interview JQK if/when she has the chance, but may not have it.  He's keeping quiet, cause he knows more than Taco.  She plays the hands that are dealt to her.  She can't control everything.

I do believe Greta was shocked as well that Kalpoe's were released. Everyone has to remember that Greta was all but put her eggs in the basket that Deepak is the criminal and Joran is not.

However, one thing strikes me that is different this time around. The present prosecutor had no real reason to put this case front and center again in the eyes of the world. If he had no evidense than he would have been better suited to have just shut up.

So, why bring it forward now? It is highly possible that he has not divulged everything. It just really doesn't make sense to have brought this case up again only to do nothing.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: brerlee on December 01, 2007, 02:38:39 AM
*YAWN* err, yeah, Aruba.

Hey, I was thinking -- sometimes I do that, ya know, but I'm usually asleep when I'm doing it -- Like I was saying, until I was rudely interrupted:

Maybe Aruba can charge Joran with "Misplacing an American Tourist" ?

Huh? Whatcha think? Surely that's gotta be a law against that.

And then charge the Kalpoe brothers and their dogs for assisting Joran in the conspiracy of misleading ALE in that misplacement of an American Tourist.

Even though the Kalpoes are "freed," they probably ain't going nowhere, 'cause if they could, they probably would've within the last two years.

Rah! Rah! Greta! Yup, she still inclined to believe Joran. Ah, which lies of his are you, Greta, inclined to believe?

Even Joran has admitted that he hasn't yet told the truth, that he might in the future.

So, Greta, which version of his lies are you inclined to believe?

I see, Greta is more inclined to believe Joran over the Kalpoes because Joran lied a lot more than them.

And Greta is in the news business. Unbelievable. Yeah, she's got a good nose for the truth. She sure does. Rah! Rah! Greta!

Yeah, I'm a Greta Fan. Not.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: brerlee on December 01, 2007, 02:44:49 AM
So they could still have a trial. They could find the Kalpoes guilty of assisting in the conspiracy of covering up the "Misplacement of an American Tourist," and their sentence could be the time already served and maybe an additional month or two.

As for Joran. Maybe he'll be found guilty of "Misplacement of an American Tourist," but because he was a minor at the time, his sentence will probably be the time already served. And Aruba will pay for his plane fair back to the land of the Dutch (they had already bought and half used a round trip ticket--hmm).

Whatca think? Am I close or what?



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2007, 02:53:28 AM
Hello Susebear, I see you are lurking, too.

I went out for a while and came back and just caught up reading.

We were not there.  We do not know in what capacity the Kalpoes were involved.  Like Joran, they are liars and may lie about what happened not only to exonerate themselves but may have done so originally as bragging.  They may have dropped Joran off, loaned him their car or other scenarios are possible that do not involve them in the actual commission of the gravest of crimes against Natalee.

I have been saying for the last few months that the cast of suspects was much smaller than originally or eventually thought by some.  This is a simple, garden variety crime and not some grand, sweeping conspiracy involving large numbers of people as some have contended.

Paulus is not subject to obstruction of justice charges because he is a first degree relative and so has a free pass under their system to aid and abet in any and all coverups.

Mos does not get to rewrite their laws as he goes along and a conviction of Joran for voluntary manslaughter is about as good as it is going to get as far as justice goes.  I hope they will tell what they did with Natalee so her parents can have that funeral in Alabama, one I think I will try to attend.

We may not like it but it is what it is and hopefully while it is too late for Natalee, this will lead to changes in their system that will benefit victims in the future.  Our own system fails to address wrongs against victims each and every day as well.  We all have room for improvement.  I think Mos is doing the best that he can within the parameters of their law. 

The light at the end of this tunnel may not be what we would like to see but it is what it is and all we are going to get.

MO

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Port Valerie on December 01, 2007, 03:34:38 AM

I do believe Greta was shocked as well that Kalpoe's were released. Everyone has to remember that Greta was all but put her eggs in the basket that Deepak is the criminal and Joran is not.

However, one thing strikes me that is different this time around. The present prosecutor had no real reason to put this case front and center again in the eyes of the world. If he had no evidense than he would have been better suited to have just shut up.

So, why bring it forward now? It is highly possible that he has not divulged everything. It just really doesn't make sense to have brought this case up again only to do nothing.

Excellent point. Yes. Of course. That is why Greta is shocked. The Kalpoes are out of jail and Joran is in. This is not at all her theory of the case. She expected exactly the opposite.





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Scandi on December 01, 2007, 03:39:26 AM
I'm encouraged after reading all these down to earth posts tonight.  We are learning some truths now as Sb said, and I liked the honesty of Mos in that presser today.

One thing I have been wondering about is that earthquake yesterday.  Even though it was too deep to create a tsunami, it still had to move a lot of rocks or coral around on the bottom of the ocean floor.  Just wondering that if she is out in the ocean, maybe it jostled that cage loose.  Sitting there for 2.5 years it might be somewhat 'cemented' in place by now and we all hope they have an idea where she could be, and want it to stay close-by.

Night everyone ;}


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: BUCKSHOT on December 01, 2007, 06:32:36 AM
ANYONE...IT IS HARD TO FATHOM THAT MOVING A BODY (CORPSE) + DESTRUCTION (MISLEADING) OF AN INVESTIGATION IS SUCH A MINOR AND INSIGNIFICANT CRIME IN ARUBA. 

WHAT WOULD THE IDENTICAL SCENARIO BE PUNISHED WITH IN THE US / ENGLAND / CANADA? I REALIZE THAT US AND ARUBA ARE DIFFERENT COUNTRIES, GOVERNED BY A DIFFERENT SET OF LAWS, BUT THE TIME DOES NOT SEEM TO FIT THE CRIME FOR DISPOSAL OF A BODY (CORPSE). IN MOST COUNTRIES A HUMAN LIFE IS GIVEN MORE RESPECT.

THIS MAY MEAN NOTHING IN THE SCOPE OF THINGS.... BUT, I THINK THE WORLD (FOR THOSE WATCHING) IS GETTING FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE OF HOW UNIQUE ARUBA'S JUDICIAL SYSTEM IS. UNIQUE IS USED HERE FOR LACK OF A BETTER WORD.

I AM NOT SURE THAT THE KALPOES WERE ONLY INVOLVED IN BODY DISPOSAL AND MISLEADING THE INVESTIGATION.  HOWEVER, IF THAT IS ALL THEY WERE INVOLVED IN, THEN PUNISH THEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARUBAN LAW.  I AM JUST CURIOUS AS TO WHAT VARIOUS OTHER CIVILIZED COUNTRIES USE AS PUNISHMENT FOR DISPOSAL OF A BODY.  THREE YEARS DOES NOT SEEM TO FIT THE BILL HERE AND WOULD NOT SERVE AS A DETERRENT FOR COMMITTING THE CRIME. IT ALMOST SEEMS TO PARALLEL A CHARGE OF BURGLARY.

THE TIMELINE HAS THEM LEAVING C&C AT 1:40AM (ISH) AND BY 2:30AM(ISH) THERE IS A POW-WOW IN A SILVER CAR AT THE RAQUET CLUB.  PANICK MODE WAS IN FULL FORCE ALREADY BY THIS TIME, IF THE SIGHTING INFORMATION IS INDEED TRUE.  I COULD BE WRONG, BUT CERTAINLY PLAUSIBLE.  EITHER KALPOES WERE AT HOME, OR THE THREE WERE STILL TOGETHER AND ALL THREE WITNESSED THE SAME CHAIN OF EVENTS. 

THESE THREE BOYS, MORE THAN LIKELY, DID NOT GO OUT THAT EVENING WITH THE INTENTION OF COMMITTING MURDER.  I REALIZE THAT INTENDING TO USE A CHEMICAL SUBSTANCE TO ENABLE THE DATE-RAPING OF AN UNSUSPECTING TOURIST IS WRONG, SADISTIC, CRIMINAL, ETC., BUT INTENDING TO MURDER IS A STRETCH.  I THINK THEIR MAIN OBJECTIVE WAS SEXUALLY ASSAULT WITH A TILTED PLAYING FIELD.

A DATE RAPE SETUP GONE WRONG IS MOST LIKELY.  OPEN FOR DEBATE IS WHETHER OR NOT NH DIED FROM THE DRUGS ALONE, WAS MURDERED BY MANSLAUGHTER (VIOLENCE), OR ALLOWED TO DIE THROUGH NEGLECT (NOT GETTING HER MEDICAL ATTENTION). 

REGARDLESS OF ONE’S OPINION SURROUNDING HER DEATH, THE EVENTS THAT UNFOLDED SUNSEQUENTLY WERE JUST PLAIN WRONG.  DISTANCING THEMSELVES FROM THE ENTIRE NIGHT WAS OBVIOUSLY THE CHOSEN ROUTE FOR THOSE INVOLVED, WHOEVER THAT MAY BE, WAS DEFINITELY THE CHOSEN ROUTE.  THE PERPETRATORS CHOSE TO CREATE A SCENARIO WHERE A TOURIST, NH, VANISHED INTO THIN AIR. WITHOUT MAGICAL POWERS, MAKING A HUMAN DISAPPEAR IS IMPOSSIBLE.

THE GREY AREA HAS BEEN THE SURROUNDING EVENTS AND PARTICIPANTS FOR THE EVENTS THAT TOOK PLACE SUBSEQUENT TO HER DEATH.  MONKEYS HAVE DONE A GREAT JOB PIECING TOGETHER POSSIBLE SCENARIOS, FOR SURE.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: msmarple on December 01, 2007, 06:43:24 AM
I was totally without computer access on Friday, 11/30/2007. The following is from that day's Diario.

http://www.diario-aruba.com/2007/11/30/ (http://www.diario-aruba.com/2007/11/30/)

Michael Saladin's case apparently postponed. This is what I recall about this odd case: Saladin is an American ex-pat, I think he used to work for NASA. A choller had asked Mrs. Saladin about washing her car; she declined. The choller allegedly threatened to damaged the car and slashed two tires. Mr. Saladin gave chase with a gun. The chase led to a public place, a gym I think. The gun brandishing apparently is the leading issue here. Meanwhile, nothing has been done about the choller who slashed the tires. I don't recall the date when this happened (although it is in the M&C thread, but it was months ago and Saladin apparently has been in jail since. (Although he was hospitalized shortly thereafter; he is not young, maybe 50s, and apparently had BP or similar health problem after the incident.

Quote
CASO CONTRA MICHAEL SALADIN A WORDO POSPONI
 
ORANJESTAD(AAN): Diahuebs Michael Saladin a presenta na corte y el a conta DIARIO cu el a bay pa entrega un bezwaarschrift, riba e 4 puntonan di cual e ta wordo acusa.El a bisa cu “hogerberoep” a atende caba 3 di e puntonan ora cu el a apela decision di hibe KIA.

Awor falta solamente e kitamento di libertad di e choller, di cual Saladin ta wordo acusa.DIARIO a puntra Saladin con ta para cu e choller.El a splica cu e choller a admiti cu el a hasi daño na su auto, pero ainda e no a tende nada ainda.

Segun Michael e choller a pidi pa e laba e auto, despues di cual el a pidi pa e cuida e auto y ora cu casa di Saladin a nenge, el a bisa cu e lo hasi daño na e auto.Segun Saladin, su casa no a kere e choller, pero ora el a bin bek di hasi compras, el a ripara cu e choller a destrui e tire-nan.

Abogado Ruiz, kende ta abogado di Saladin a splica cu no ta asina cu diferente  acusacion a wordo bari for di mesa, pero huez den corte superior a bisa anteriormente cu mirando con e caso a bay, e no ta imagina su mes cu Saladin lo haya un castigo incondicional.

Tabata tin algun acusacion hasi tambe contra Saladin, cu tabata hopi cla pa huez.Pa mesun motibo ey, huez a dicidi biaha pasa, cu Saladin por sali liber.Diahuebs ora nan a presenta dilanti di huez, e caso a wordo posponi, en espera pa corte superior trata e bezwaarschrift.

DIARIO a puntra e abogado kico ta e sentencia cu e ta spera di haya.Ruiz a bisa cu e ta spera cu su cliente wordo declara liber di tur acusacion, pasobra e caso aki a wordo exagera.

No mester lubida e motibo dicon loke a sosode, a sosode.Tin un choller den wega, cu a kibra dos tire di Saladin y cu te ainda no a paga pa esaki.

Online Pap translation:

caso contra michael saladin owing to wordo posponi

oranjestad(aan): diahuebs michael saladin owing to present at corte y past owing to count ; daily paper cu past owing to bay for entrega one bezwaarschrift, on the 4 puntonan of cual the is wordo acusa.el owing to tell cu “hogerberoep” owing to atende end 3 of the puntonan hour cu past owing to apela decision of hibe kia.

now miss only the kitamento of freedom of the choller, of cual saladin is wordo acusa.diario owing to ask about saladin con is stop cu the choller.el owing to splica cu the choller owing to admiti cu past owing to make damage at his car, but still the not owing to hear nothing still.

according michael the choller owing to ask for her wash the car, after of cual past owing to ask for her cuida the car y hour cu casa of saladin owing to nenge, past owing to tell cu the will make damage at the car.segun saladin, his casa not owing to believe the choller, but hour past owing to come bek of make compras, past owing to ripara cu the choller owing to destrui the tire-nan.

advocate ruiz, that is advocate of saladin owing to splica cu do not so cu various acusacion owing to wordo sweep for of table, but huez in corte superior owing to tell anteriormente cu mirando con the caso owing to bay, the do not imagina his self cu saladin will achieve one castigo incondicional.

was have some acusacion make also contra saladin, cu was much cla for huez.pa same motibo ey, huez owing to dicidi trip happen, cu saladin can leave pound.diahuebs hour they owing to present fast of huez, the caso owing to wordo posponi, provided that espera for corte superior deal the bezwaarschrift.

daily paper owing to ask about the advocate kico is the sentencia cu the is wait for of achieve.ruiz owing to tell cu the is wait for cu his cliente wordo declara pound of all acusacion, because the caso here owing to wordo exagera.

not have to forget the motibo dicon thing owing to sosode, owing to sosode.tin one choller in game, cu owing to break two tire of saladin y cu till still not owing to pay for this.

* * *
Again, this is Friday's edition of Diario - before the release of 2K.

Quote
AWE HUEZ LO DICIDI SI DEEPAK Y SATISH POR
KEDA CU MESUN ABOGADO

 
ORANJESTAD(AAN): Diahuebs DIARIO a entrevista abogado David Kock, relaciona cu e caso di Natalee Holloway.Segun abogado Kock, Ministerio Publico siman pasa a ordena pa e sospechosonan Deepak y Satish Kalpoe haya diferente abogado di otro.

Diahuebs tabata tin tratamento di apelacion di esaki cu e abogado a pidi, pa su oficina sigui como abogado di ambos sospechoso.

Un huez di Corsow a bin Aruba pa trata e caso y abogado Kock a bisa cu e ta sumamente contento con tratamento di e peticion a bay.

Awe mes huez lo duna su decision riba esaki y e abogado lo haya e decision via fax.DIARIO a puntra e abogado si e team investigativo a papia cu su cliente durante e dianan cu a pasa.

Segun mr. Kock, nan a papia si, pero bo no mester ni dos man pa conta e cantidad di ora cu nan a papia cune.Asina mes cu nan a bisa cu tabata asina importante pa detene e sospechosonan.

Prensa a puntra tambe abogado Figaroa kende ta representa Deepak Kalpoe, con ta para cu su cliente.

Segun Figaroa, su estado di animo ta bin y e ta hopi sigur di su mes.DIARIO a puntra Figaroa con ta para cu interogacion di su cliente y el a bisa cu su cliente ta wordo interoga.

DIARIO a puntra e abogado tambe con e ta wak e pruebanan supuestamente nobo.El a bisa cu e tambe ta di opinion cu e pruebanan no ta nobo.

Nan ta wordo mira for di un angulo nobo, pero nan no ta nobo.DIARIO a puntra e abogado si el a pasa door di tur e documentonan caba.

Figaroa a bisa cu e dossier bieu tin mas di 2 mil pagina y e no a ni ricibi esakinan ainda.El a haya si e documentonan nobo.

Online Pap translation:

today huez will dicidi if deepak y satish can
stay cu same advocate


oranjestad(aan): diahuebs daily paper owing to interview advocate david kock, relaciona cu the caso of natalee holloway.segun advocate kock, ministerio publico week happen owing to ordena for her sospechosonan deepak y satish kalpoe achieve various advocate of another. {this seems to be about the matter of having the same attorney for both brothers.}

diahuebs was have tratamento of apelacion of this cu the advocate owing to ask, for his office follow because; advocate of both sospechoso.

one huez of corsow owing to come aruba for deal the caso y advocate kock owing to tell cu the is extremely contento con tratamento of the peticion owing to bay.

today self huez will give his decision on this y the advocate will achieve the decision via fax.diario owing to ask about the advocate if the team investigativo owing to talk cu his cliente during the dianan cu owing to happen.

according mr. kock, they owing to talk if, but do you not have to neither two hand for count ; the cantidad of hour cu they owing to talk cune.asina self cu they owing to tell cu was so important for detene the sospechosonan.

prensa owing to ask about also advocate figaroa that is representa deepak kalpoe, con is stop cu his cliente.

according figaroa, his estado of animo is come y the is much assure of his self.diario owing to ask about figaroa con is stop cu interogacion of his cliente y past owing to tell cu his cliente is wordo interoga.

daily paper owing to ask about the advocate also con the looking at the pruebanan supuestamente new.el owing to tell cu the also is of opinion cu the pruebanan do not new.

they're wordo see for of one angulo new, but they do not new.diario owing to ask about the advocate if past owing to happen door of all the documentonan end.

figaroa owing to tell cu the dossier old have more of 2 thousand pagina y the not owing to neither ricibi esakinan still.el owing to achieve if the documentonan new.

* * *
A letter to Jossy from Art Wood. I *think* this was published in both Papiamentu and English, although the full English version is not coming up on my computer.

Quote
Jossy, E ultimo noticia ta conmove mi curazon y ta recorda mi con duro a bo, Eduardo y mi persona a traha pa trece e caso aki den husticia.
Mi ta spera tur cos ta bon
 
Apreciado Jossy Mansur,

E re-aresto di Joran Van der Sloot y rumannan Kalpoe ta pone Aruba un biaha mas den spotlight mundial, locual ta pone mas atencion y emocion relaciona cu e desaparicion di Natalee Holloway. Mientras mi ta hala atras y cuidadosamente ta observa e ultimo eventonan tumando lugar, mi mester admiti cu mi ta un poco mas esceptico relaciona cu e intencion di Aruba pa resolve e caso aki.

Por fabor tuma nota cu mi a referi na “intencion” di Aruba\' y no su \"Abilidad\" pa resolve e caso di Natalee Holloway. E pueblo di Aruba merece pa haya sa e berdad den e tragedia aki y no worde mal-informa pa media of su Gobierno. Ta pesey mi ta skirbi esaki. Mi kier pa pueblo di Aruba cuestiona e sinceridad di algun autoridad envolvi y no worde ciega pa miedo di publicidad negativo.

Durante e curso di e investigacion aki, mi a bira amigo personal di bo y bo yiu Eduardo, como tambe Dave Holloway.Mi por declara sin duda ningun cu nos intencion y obhetivonan tabata sali for di nos curazon pa e deseo di encontra Natalee.

Den un bida henter trahando como oficial di polis mi ta haya cu e oficialnan di polis di Aruba cu mi por a conoce ta polisnan capaz, competente y profesional. Aunke, manera bo por corda, consistentemente y repetidamente mi a laga sa mi preocupacion relaciona cu e rol di Dennis Jacobs, un agente den departamento di narcotico, pa su asignacion den e caso como investigador principal, pa e Comisario Van der Straaten. Aruba tin detectivenan cu experiencia den casonan di homicidio y desaparicion di personanan. Di con nan no a haya e oportunidad pa resolve e caso aki. Van der Straaten mes a trece duda den e caso cu su amistad personal cu Paulus Van der Sloot.

Un duda cu nunca a termina cu su retiro, mientras Dave Holloway y mi persona a descubri cu e tabata reuni regularmente cu Jacobs y e Comisario Dompig lunanan durante e investigacion. Esey lo por ta apenas un coincidencia of nan por tin un amistad tambe, pero nos a haya esaki inusual. Mi criticanan di Jacobs a worde bon documenta y mi no ta bay ripiti esaki.

El a worde pasa den mannan di e Prome Minister y Procurador General di Aruba, hunto cu un peticion pa kita Jacobs y Dompig for di e caso. Famianan Holloway y Twitty tambe a tuma parti na e peticion aki.

Na October 2005 Dave Holloway y mi persona a reuni den secreto cu Fiscal Amolyn Flanegin. Nos a haci esaki cu conocimento y permiso di e Procurador General. E meta di e reunion aki tabata pa vocifera nos preocupacion relaciona cu e iregularidadnan cu Dennis Jacobs y Comisario Dompig a mustra durante e curso di e investigacion y nos peticion pa Landsrecherche investiga e dos agentenan aki.

Ami cu Dave a duna Comisario Dompig un pista persuasivo relaciona cu amigo di Joran, Koen Gottenbos y nos tabata sinti cu Gottenbos lo por ta un clave pa resolve e caso. Yiu adolescente di Comisario Dompig a bisa Dave Holloway cu Paulus Van der Sloot aparentemente a fia un boto rond di e lapso di tempo di desaparicion di Natalee. Ami y Dave a haya sa cu e boto tabata di tata di Koen Gottenbos y cu Koen tabata tin miedo di worde aresta. Asina hopi cu e anochi e tabata drumi hunto cu su mayornan riba cama.

Durante e curso di e reunion aki Fiscal Flanegin a bisa nos cu el a resigna for di e caso di Holloway pa motibo di respuesta negativo di (Jacobs y Dompig) pa sigui cu e pistanan relaciona cu Gottenbos. Specificamente cu Koen Gottenbos a suministra Joran cu un alibi ficticio pa e anochi di 31 di Mei, 2005. Flanegin a bisa \"sigui e mentiranan y lo bo descubri e berdad.\"

Dos aña a pasa y nos no tin motibo pa kere cu polis a investiga nos peticion pa bay tras di Koen Gottenbos. Nos a haya sa awo cu evidencianan nobo a sali afo di via yamadanan di telefon y e-mails. Mi por bisabo cu Koen Gottenbos a e-mail Joran tur dia!Mi ta spera y reza cu mi escepticismo ta innecesario y cu husticia lo prevalece.

Dios bendiciona pueblo di Aruba.

Arthur E. Wood

(Arthur E. Wood ta un ex agente special di Servicio Secreto, kende a protehe Presidentenan Ford, Carter, Reagan, Bush y Clinton. El a worde honra como Oficial di Polis di aña, pa e Asociacion Internacional di Investigadornan di Credit Card na 1986 y ta un autor y ta conoci pa promove derechonan di victimanan.)

Online Pap translation:

jossy, the ultimo news is conmove my curazon y is recorda my con duro owing to do you,
eduardo y my person owing to work for trece the caso here in husticia.
i am wait for all cos is good


dear jossy mansur,

the re-aresto of joran van der sloot y rumannan kalpoe is place aruba once more in spotlight mundial, locual is place more atencion y emocion relaciona cu the desaparicion of natalee holloway. while i am wing behind y cuidadosamente is observa the ultimo eventonan tumando lugar, my have to admiti cu i am one some more esceptico relaciona cu the intencion of aruba for resolve the caso here.

can please take notice cu i have referi at “intencion” of aruba' y not his "abilidad" for resolve the caso of natalee holloway. the people of aruba merece for achieve know the berdad in the tragedy here y not worde mal-informa for media or his gobierno. is pesey i am write this. my wanted for people of aruba cuestiona the sinceridad of some autoridad envolvi y not worde ciega for fright of publicidad negative.

during the curso of the investigacion here, i have become amigo personal of you y do you child eduardo, because; also dave holloway.mi can declara without doubt none cu we intencion y obhetivonan was leave for of we curazon for her desire of encontra natalee.

in one life all trahando because; oficial of police i am achieve cu the oficialnan of police of aruba cu my can owing to conoce is polisnan capaz, competente y profesional. although, as could you corda, consistentemente y repetidamente i have let know my preocupacion relaciona cu the rol of dennis jacobs, one agent in departamento of narcotico, for his asignacion in the caso because; investigador principal, for her comisario van der straaten. aruba have detectivenan cu experiencia in casonan of homicidio y desaparicion of personanan. of con they not owing to achieve the oportunidad for resolve the caso here. van der straaten self owing to trece doubt in the caso cu his amistad personal cu paulus van der sloot.

one doubt cu never owing to termina cu his retiro, while dave holloway y my person owing to descubri cu the was reuni regularly cu jacobs y the comisario dompig lunanan during the investigacion. esey will can is barely one coincidencia or they can have one amistad also, but we owing to achieve this inusual. my criticanan of jacobs owing to worde good documenta y my do not bay ripiti this.

past owing to worde happen in hands of the first minister y procurador general of aruba, together cu one peticion for less jacobs y dompig for of the caso. famianan holloway y twitty also did take part at the peticion here.

at october 2005 dave holloway y my person owing to reuni in secreto cu fiscal amolyn flanegin. we owing to haci this cu conocimento y permission of the procurador general. the aim of the meeting here was for vocifera we preocupacion relaciona cu the iregularidadnan cu dennis jacobs y comisario dompig owing to show during the curso of the investigacion y we peticion for landsrecherche investiga the two agentenan here.

i cu dave owing to give comisario dompig one pista persuasivo relaciona cu amigo of joran, koen gottenbos y we was feel cu gottenbos will can is one clave for resolve the caso. child adolescente of comisario dompig owing to tell dave holloway cu paulus van der sloot apparently owing to lend one boat rond of the lapso of time of desaparicion of natalee. i y dave owing to achieve know cu the boat was of father of koen gottenbos y cu koen was have fright of worde aresta. so much cu the night the was sleep together cu his parents on cama.

during the curso of the meeting here fiscal flanegin owing to tell we cu past owing to resigna for of the caso of holloway for motibo of respuesta negative of (jacobs y dompig) for follow cu the pistanan relaciona cu gottenbos. specificamente cu koen gottenbos owing to suministra joran cu one alibi ficticio for her night of 31 of half, 2005. flanegin owing to tell "sigui the mentiranan y will do you descubri the berdad."

two year owing to happen y we not have motibo for believe cu police owing to investiga we peticion for bay behind koen gottenbos. we owing to achieve know awo cu evidencianan new owing to leave afo of via yamadanan of telephone y e-mails. my can bisabo cu koen gottenbos owing to e-mail joran all day!mi is wait for y reza cu my escepticismo is innecesario y cu husticia will prevalece.

god bendiciona people of aruba.

arthur e. wood

(arthur e. wood is one ex agent special of servicio secreto, that owing to protehe presidentenan ford, carter, reagan, bush y clinton. past owing to worde honor because; oficial of police of year, for her asociacion internacional of investigadornan of credit card at 1986 y is one author y is conoci for promove derechonan of victimanan.)

Here is the portion I can access that was published online in English - just the first couple of paragraphs.

Quote
Dear Jossy Mansur,
The re-arrest of Joran Van der Sloot and the Kalpoe brothers puts Aruba right back into the world spotlight with a flood of attention and emotion regarding the disappearance of Natalee Holloway. As I stand back and cautiously watch the latest events unfold I have to admit that I am more than a little skeptical concerning Aruba's intention to solve this case.

Please take notice that I reference Aruba's "intention" and not It's "Ability" to solve the Natalee Holloway case. The fine people of Aruba deserve to know the truth in this tragedy and not to be mislead by the News media or the Government. That is why I am writing. I want the people of Aruba to question the sincerity of some of the officials involved and not be blinded by fears of negative publicity.



* * *
Jossy is addressing JoeT here ... the English version. The Pap version is also published (final item in my post - I try to keep these things in the same order as they are published).

Quote
POLICE REPORT
 
 
POLICE REPORT


We, Juan Enrique Boezem, Dennis Dominico Jacobs, Luigi Angelo Giovanni Croes and Ghrizanti Anuar Tromp, respectively head officers, police officer first class and police officer of Aruba, respectively members of Detective district nr {Noord?} 2 and Robbery Project Team, declare the following:

On June 13, 2005 about 19:50, the suspect Joran A.P. van der Sloot declared that he possibly knows where the other suspect Deepak Sharma Kalpoe, buried the missing girl Natalee Ann Holloway’s body under the sand, and that he was willing to show justice the location.

Because of this statement, we the police officers on the 13th of May 2005, around 20:00, together with the suspect J.A.P van der Sloot went together, so he could show us the place. {This is supposed to say "13th of June 2005".}

Following directions of J.A.P van der Sloot, we went to a seccion of the beach on the North side of Marriott Hotel.

Right at the first fisherman’s hut, on the North side of Marriott Hotel, the suspect stated that on the 30th of May 2005, around 2:00 am, he lay down with Natalee Holloway on the beach.

While we the officers were occupied with the suspect’s directions, J.A.P van der Sloot stated that when Natalee Holloway fell asleep on the beach, he left her behind, right in front of the first fisherman’s hut, on the North side of Marriott Hotel.

The suspect Joran van der Sloot walked with us a little further and he stated that he has the suspicion that suspect Deepak Kalpoe buried the girl close to that area.

According to suspect J.A.P van der Sloot, the suspect Deepak Kalpoe came back to the girl, after he had left her behind asleep.

On our question to J.A.P van der Sloot of what he thought had happened between Natalee Holloway and Deepak Kalpoe, he stated that he thinks that suspect Deepak Kalpoe raped and killed the girl. This polis report is made by us as police officers under oath, and signed on June 13th 2005.The polis officers

J.E Boezem                   D.D Jacobs
L.A.G Croes                  G.A Tromp

* * *
Still talking to JoeT ... in English, online. I think someone already has posted this. I want to EMPHASIZE that Jossy is putting some of this edition in English (online, anyway) - wants to be sure JoeT can read it!

Quote
Tacopina: a badly informed lawyer 
 
By: Jossy M. Mansur


     Once again this man, who thinks himself a star lawyer, has given various televised interviews in which he unfortunately proves that he has no control over his emotions, and uttered one nonsense after the other, with a visible anger he could not camouflage! What is he looking for really? Popularity? This certainly is not the way to achieve his goal!

     I have an immense regard for Greta, but I can't understand why she gives this man the last word and doesn’t let us confront him. Neither does she with the facts of the case, which Greta is fully aware of, I’m sure. Maybe in the US, there might be some people that are afraid of his tongue and temper, but with me, he is climbing the wrong tree!

     How does a lawyer who pretends to have any class, say that what I’ve quoted from Joran’s deposition isn’t true? I again publish this document in the original Dutch, with a translation in English. This should put duct tape on Tacopina’s mouth.

In the referred document, Joran said to four Aruban police officers that he thinks he might know where Natalee’s body is buried, and that he thinks that Deepak went back to the beach where the girl was lying on the sand, raped and killed Natalee, and afterward buried her close to the first fishermen’s hut! And he also wants to ignore a taped conversation in a police car, where the three suspects (Joran, Deepak and Satish were sitting in the backseat), trying to make his client, Joran, come out “innocent” in his confrontation with Deepak.

Does this lawyer know how to read? Or is he simply dumb? Deepak said directly to Joran (and the police have this tape!): “If they find the girl, you are looking at 15 years in prison! What did he mean by that? That Joran is “innocent” or “guilty” of something that will send him behind bars for so many years? Can this big-mouthed lawyer understand this? Or does he only want to impose his street style here too? Attacking my evidence based on real facts won’t help his client, and if he doesn’t stop painting Joran like an angel, I’ll find myself forced to publish everything we have found out about him since he was 8 years old! He is certainly no “angel”, believe me!

     Let Tacopina understand once and for all that I have 33 years of journalism in Aruba behind me, and that if the American media ask for my comments, it is because they are aware that I know more than Tacopina thinks! Could he possibly be trying to break my credibility with the American People, by his clownish acts on TV? I’ve always spoken the truth to them! I have nothing to hide from anyone. My relationship with David Kock and Ronny Wix, the defense lawyers for the Kalpoe brothers is excellent! They have the professional ethics that Tacopina lacks and a good sense in the practice of law, of that I’m sure!

     In my opinion, Paulus committed a critical error when he hired Tacopina to defend Joran, because he doesn’t know our environment, he is not up-to-date directly on what happened to Natalee, and all his “knowledge” seems to come from what he has read about the case. I’m sure he doesn’t have half of the documents that DIARIO has. Furthermore, we have additional documents that no other media can even dream of having, and that’s because we are serious journalists that respect authorities and cooperate with them when asked to do so.

     I’ve said on Greta’s show that the three suspects know very well what happened to Natalee, because they were the last ones that were with her on the night of her disappearance. Forget about the tales that from Carlos n’ Charlies they left her at the Holiday Inn or at the beach close to the Marriott! The story about going behind the Lighthouse to see sharks also leaves lots of doubts.

There are contradicting testimonies from Joran, Deepak and Satish! Joran said that they went to his apartment from Carlos n’ Charlies; the Kalpoe brothers have completely denied that statement. They have declared to the police that they didn’t go to that apartment! Which party is telling the truth? And Joran declared that Deepak picked him up at the beach, but Deepak denied that allegation. And then Joran said it was Satish that picked him up! But Satish also denied that he picked him up! The big question Tacopina has to answer is: How did Joran get back home that night? Did he walk? Did Paulus pick him up? Or was there someone else?

And can Tacopina explain to us how his client did the miracle of letting his shoes grow from size 11 to size 14 in one night?

     These are some of the discrepancies that authorities have been investigating again, because they don’t make any sense! For instance, what was the real relationship between Joran and Koen? Why did he leave the island one or two days after Natalee disappeared? Why, when Art Wood and Dave, Natalee’s father, asked authorities to interrogate him, it wasn’t done? Why hasn’t he been interrogated so far?  My reliable sources tell me that Koen knows exactly what happened that night!
     
If Tacopina thinks that we’re not aware of ALL the details of this case, he is badly mistaken! The truth is that we honor our word and will not reveal what we know from our police and judicial sources when asked not to do so! What is said to us in trust will never be betrayed, because then we would be betraying our principles!

     I hope this case goes to Court as soon as possible, and if Joran, Deepak and Satish are innocent, they will be cleared by the judge. And if one or more are guilty, this also will be determined by the evidence presented to the presiding Judge. My advice to Tacopina? Stay in the US! Your presence in Aruba will only cause more harm to Joran! Believe me!

* * *
Pap version of the "Police Report" above.

Quote
PROCES-VERBAAL
 
Nos, Juan Enrique Boezem, Dennis Dominico Jacobs, Luigi Angelo Giovanni Croes y Ghrizanti Anuar Tromp, respectivamente “hoofdagenten”, agente di polis eerste klas y agente di cuerpo policial di Aruba, respectivamente miembro di Distrito di Recherche 2 y Team di Proyecto di Atraco, ta declara lo siguiente:

Riba 13 di Juni 2005, alrededor di 19:50, e sospechoso Joran A.P. van der Sloot a declara cu posiblemente e sa unda cu e otro sospechoso Deepak Sharma Kalpoe, a dera curpa di e mucha muher perdi, Natalee Ann Holloway, bao di santo y cu e tabata dispuesto pa mustra husticia e lugar.
A consecuencia di su declaracion, nos como polis riba 13 di Mei 2005, alrededor di 20:00, hunto cu sospechoso J.A.P van der Sloot, a core bay pa e mustra nos e lugar.

Riba indicacion di e sospechoso J.A.P van der Sloot, nos a bay na e parti di beach pa Noord di Marriott Hotel.

Net cerca e prome fisherman’s hut, pa Noord di Marriott Hotel, e sospechoso a declara cu eynan riba 30 di Mei 2005 alrededor di 2:00, el a drumi riba beach hunto cu e mucha muher Natalee Holloway.

Riba momento cu nos como agente policial tabata ocupa cu e indicacion duna, e sospechoso J.A.P van der Sloot a declara cu ora cu e mucha muher Natalee Holloway a pega soño riba beach, el a laga e mucha muher atras, net na e prome fisherman’s hut, pa Noord di Marriott Hotel.

E sospechoso J.A.P van der Sloot despues a cana cu nos un tiki mas leu y el a declara cu e tin e sospechonan cu e sospechoso Deepak Kalpoe a dera e mucha muher eybanda cerca.

Segun e sospechoso J.A.P van der Sloot, e sospechoso Deepak Kalpoe a bin bek cerca e mucha muher, despues cu el a laga e mucha muher atras na soño.

Riba nos pregunta na J.A.P van der Sloot, kico el a kere cu a sosode entre e mucha muher Natalee Holloway y e sospechoso Deepak Kalpoe, el a declara cu e ta kere cu e sospechoso Deepak Kalpoe a viola e mucha muher sexualmente y cu el a asesine.

E proces verbaal aki ta traha pa nos como agente policial bao di huramento y firma riba 13 di Juni 2005.                 
e agentenan policial

J.E Boezem                              D.D Jacobs
L.A.G Croes                            G.A Tromp

Online Pap translation:

proces-verbaal

we, juan enrique boezem, dennis dominico jacobs, luigi angelo giovanni croes y ghrizanti anuar tromp, respectivamente “hoofdagenten”, agent of police eerste class y agent of cuerpo policial of aruba, respectivamente acolyte of distrito of recherche 2 y team of proyecto of atraco, is declara will siguiente:

on 13 of june 2005, alrededor of 19:50, the sospechoso joran owing to.p. van der sloot owing to declara cu posiblemente the know where cu the another sospechoso deepak sharma kalpoe, owing to bury curpa of the child muher perdi, natalee ann holloway, bao of sand y cu the was dispuesto for show husticia the lugar.

owing to consecuencia of his declaracion, we because; police on 13 of half 2005, alrededor of 20:00, together cu sospechoso j.a.p van der sloot, owing to core bay for her show we the lugar.

on indicacion of the sospechoso j.a.p van der sloot, we owing to bay at the part of beach for north of marriott hotel.

just close the first fisherman’s hut, for north of marriott hotel, the sospechoso owing to declara cu eynan on 30 of half 2005 alrededor of 2:00, past owing to sleep on beach together cu the child muher natalee holloway.

on instant cu we because; agent policial was ocupa cu the indicacion give, the sospechoso j.a.p van der sloot owing to declara cu hour cu the child muher natalee holloway owing to stick dream on beach, past owing to let the child muher behind, just at the first fisherman’s hut, for north of marriott hotel.

the sospechoso j.a.p van der sloot after owing to march cu we one bit more far y past owing to declara cu the have the sospechonan cu the sospechoso deepak kalpoe owing to bury the child muher eybanda close.

according the sospechoso j.a.p van der sloot, the sospechoso deepak kalpoe owing to come bek close the child muher, after cu past owing to let the child muher behind at dream.

on we question at j.a.p van der sloot, kico past owing to believe cu owing to sosode among the child muher natalee holloway y the sospechoso deepak kalpoe, past owing to declara cu the is believe cu the sospechoso deepak kalpoe owing to viola the child muher sexualmente y cu past owing to asesine.

the proces verbaal here is work for we because; agent policial bao of huramento y company on 13 of june 2005.

the agentenan policial
j.e boezem
d.d jacobs
l.a.g croes
g.a tromp

* * *

Once again - please remember that this is from the Friday, 11/30/2007 edition of Diario. I was unable to read/post on Friday.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: msmarple on December 01, 2007, 06:47:59 AM
I was totally without computer access on Friday, 11/20/2007. The following is from that day's Diario.

http://www.diario-aruba.com/2007/11/30/ (http://www.diario-aruba.com/2007/11/30/)

klaas - I made a typo; please change the date I was without access to a computer to Friday, 11/30/2007.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: msmarple on December 01, 2007, 06:55:26 AM
Just wanted to add that I hope someone here can get the full Enlgish version of Art's letter to Jossy - the one Jossy published 11/30/2007. Also would like to know its date.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Buckeye on December 01, 2007, 07:21:29 AM
Just wanted to add that I hope someone here can get the full Enlgish version of Art's letter to Jossy - the one Jossy published 11/30/2007. Also would like to know its date.

I can't even find the pap version of the Art Wood letter.   :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: msmarple on December 01, 2007, 07:30:32 AM
Meanwhile, Saturday's edition of Diario is up, and here's a recap on that.

http://www.diario-aruba.com/2007/12/1/ (http://www.diario-aruba.com/2007/12/1/)

I'm pretty sure this is word-for-word the same "editorial" Jossy published in the previous day's edition (11/30/2007).

Quote
A badly informed lawyer

By: Jossy M. Mansur


Once again this man, who thinks himself a star lawyer, has given various televised interviews in which he unfortunately proves that he has no control over his emotions, and uttered one nonsense after the other in angry tone he could not camouflage! What is he looking for really? Popularity? This certainly is not the way to achieve his goal!

I have an immense regard for Greta, but I can't understand why she gives this man the last word and doesn't let us confront him. Neither does she with the facts of the case, which Greta is fully aware of, I'm sure. Maybe in the US, there might be some people that are afraid of his tongue and temper, but with me, he is climbing the wrong tree!

How does a lawyer who pretends to have any class, say that what I've quoted from Joran's deposition isn't true? I again publish this document in the original Dutch, with a translation in English. This should put duct tape on Tacopina's mouth.

In the referred document, Joran said to four Aruban police officers that he thinks he might know where Natalee's body is buried, and that he thinks that Deepak went back to the beach where the girl was lying on the sand, raped and killed Natalee, and afterward buried her close to the first fishermen's hut! And he also wants to ignore a taped conversation in a police car, where the three suspects (Joran, Deepak and Satish were sitting in the back seat), trying to make his client, Joran, come out "innocent" in his confrontation with Deepak. Does this lawyer know how to read? Or is he simply dumb? Deepak said directly to Joran (and the police have this tape!): "if they find the girl, you are looking at 15 years in prison! What did he mean by that? That Joran is "innocent" or "guilty" of something that will send him behind bars for so many years? Can this big-mouthed lawyer understand this? Or does he only want to impose his street style here too? Attacking my evidence based on real facts won't help his client, and if he doesn't stop painting Joran like an angel, I'll find myself forced to publish everything we have found out about him since he was 8 years old! He is certainly no "angel", believe me!

Let Tacopina understand once and for all that I have 33 years of journalism in Aruba behind me, and that if the American media ask for my comments, it is because they are aware that I know more than Tacopina thinks! Could he possibly be trying to break my credibility with the American People, by his clownish acts on TV? I've always spoken the truth to them! I have nothing to hide from anyone. My relationship with David Kock and Ronny Wix, the defense lawyers for the Kalpoe brothers is excellent! They have the professional ethics that Tacopina lacks and a good sense in the practice of law, of that I'm sure!

In my opinion, Paulus committed a critical error when he hired Tacopina to defend Joran, because he doesn't know our environment, he is not up-to-date directly on what happened to Natalee, and all his "knowledge" seems to come from what he has read about the case. I'm sure he doesn't have half of the documents that DIARIO has. Furthermore, we have additional documents that no other media can even dream of having, and that's because we are serious journalists that respect authorities and cooperate with them when asked to do so.

I've said on Greta's show that the three suspects know very well what happened to Natalee, because they were the last ones that were with her on the night of her disappearance. Forget about the tales that from Carlos and Charlies they left her at the Holiday Inn or at the beach close to the Marriott! The story about going behind the Lighthouse to see sharks also leaves lots of doubts. There are contradicting testimonies from Joran, Deepak and Satish! Joran said that they went to his apartment from Carlos and Charlies; the Kalpoe brothers have completely denied that statement. They have declared to the police that they didn't go to that apartment! Which party is telling the truth? And Joran declared that Deepak picked him up at the beach, but Deepak denied that allegation. And then Joran said it was Satish that picked him up! But Satish also denied that he picked him up! The big question Tacopina has to answer is: How did Joran get back home that night? Did he walk? Did Paulus pick him up? Or was there someone else?

And can Tacopina explain to us how his client did the miracle of letting his shoes grow from size 11 to size 14 in one night?

These are some of the discrepancies that authorities have been investigating again, because they don't make any sense! For instance, what was the real relationship between Joran and Koen? Why did he leave the island one or two days after Natalee disappeared? Why, when Art Wood and Dave, Natalee's father, asked authorities to interrogate him, it wasn't done? Why hasn't he been interrogated so far? My reliable sources tell me that Koen knows exactly what happened that night!

If Tacopina thinks that we're not aware of ALL the details of this case, he is badly mistaken! The truth is that we honor our word and will not reveal what we know from our police and judicial sources when asked not to do so! What is said to us in trust will never be betrayed, because then we would be betraying our principles!

I hope this case goes to Court as soon as possible, and if Joran, Deepak and Satish are innocent, they will be cleared by the judge. And if one or more are guilty, this also will be determined by the evidence presented to the presiding Judge. My advice to Tacopina? Stay in the US! Your presence in Aruba will only cause more harm to Joran! Believe me!

Jossy offers links to the Dutch and English versions of the Polis Report / PV referred to on Greta's "On the Record". Those are in the previous day's Diario and in my post for that edition (above).

* * *
This one is about 2K release, I think - "rechasa"?

Quote
Peticion pa prolonga e detencion di rumannan K. den e caso
di Natalee Holloway a wordo rechasa

 
ORANJESTAD(AAN)-- Ayera huez-comisario a rechasa e peticion pa prolonga e detencion di e rumannan Kalpoe.

 Nan ta wordo sospecha, hunto cu e di tres sospechoso Joran. v.d. Sloot., di morto di Natalee Holloway of di en todo caso, maltrato di tal forma cu a hiba na su morto. Ministerio Publico a pidi pa prolongacion di nan detencion.

Huez-comisario a dicidi cu e dossier penal actual contra e sospechosonan, na cual pruebanan nobo a wordo agrega recientemente, tin suficiente contenido pa tin obheccionnan serio contra nan, pero solamente pa hechonan cu segun ley no ta permiti detencion preventivo, cua ta destruccion di rastronan di un crimen y/o excavacion di un cadaver.

E castigo cu por wordo imponi pa e delitonan aki no ta suficiente pa por usa e medio de detencion preventivo.

E decision di Hues-Comisario por wordo apela dentro di tres dia. Durante e dianan venidero Ministerio Publico lo studia e posibilidad aki.

Online Pap translation:

peticion for prolonga the detencion of rumannan k. in the caso
of natalee holloway owing to wordo rechasa


oranjestad(aan)-- yesterday huez-comisario owing to rechasa {dismiss?} the peticion for prolonga the detencion of the rumannan kalpoe.

they're wordo sospecha, together cu the of three sospechoso joran. v.d. sloot., of dead of natalee holloway or of provided that todo caso, maltrato of such form cu owing to take away at his dead. ministerio publico owing to ask for prolongacion of they detencion.

huez-comisario owing to dicidi cu the dossier penal actual contra the sospechosonan, at cual pruebanan new owing to wordo agrega recientemente, have sufficient contenido for have obheccionnan earnest contra they, but only for hechonan cu according ley do not permiti detencion preventivo, cua is destruccion of rastronan of one crimen y/o excavacion of one cadaver.

the castigo cu can wordo imponi for her delitonan here do not sufficient for can using the medio de detencion preventivo.

the decision of hues-comisario can wordo apela dentro of three day. during the dianan venidero ministerio publico will study the posibilidad here.

* * *
I am totally confused by this one. I think the matter of two lawyers for 2K still stands, and JVDS not getting other requested privileges - but I'm not at all sure that's what this says.

Quote
Corte Comun a rechaza apelacion di abogadonan di D.K. den caso Holloway
A mantgene mayoria di restriccionnan contra J. v.d. S.
 
 
ORANJESTAD(AAN)--Ayera Corte Comun di Husticia a dicidi riba dos apelacion separa cu a wordo entrega pa abogadonan di e sospechosonan D.K. y J. v.d. S. den e caso Holloway. D.K. y J. v.d. S.  ta wordo sospecha, hunto cu e di tres sospechoso S.K., di morto di Natalee Holloway of di en todo caso maltrato di tal forma cu a hiba na su morto.

Ayera e apelacionnan aki a wordo trata tras di porta cera.Den e caso contra D.K., huez-comisario a duna ordo, riba peticion di Ministerio Publico, pa nenga e abogadonan Kock, Wix y Zeppenveldt acceso na e sospechoso D.K. pa un duracion di ocho dia. Te ultimo e abogadonan Kock, Wix y Zeppenveldt a representa e rumannan K. como ekipo.

Ministerio Publico a pidi pa e ordo aki a base di e sospecho cu D.K. lo por ta hayando informacion tocante e investigacion cu lo mester wordo teni for di dje of cu e investigacion pa yega na e berdad lo por wordo stroba.

E sospecho aki ta basa riba informacion for di raport di Polis cu ta duna sosten na e teoria cu hopi tempo pasa, D.K. a palabra cu su ruman S.K. tocante nan posicion den e investigacion. Riba dje Ministerio Publico a ripara cu e sospechosonan ta ahusta nan declaracionnan na otro. Esaki hunto cu e hecho cu ambos sospechoso ta wordo representa pa e mes ekipo di abogado a haci cu Ministerio Publico a pidi pa e ordo.

Huez-comisario a sigui e argumentonan di Ministerio Publico y a duna ordo cu e tres abogadonan no por bishita nan cliente D.K. E abogadonan a apela e decision aki cerca Corte Comun. Actualmente nan ta representa solamente S.K. Riba peticion di e abogadonan menciona, D.K. ta wordo representa pa un otro abogado desde siman pasa.

Corte Comun a dicidi awe cu e ordo di huez-comisario ta na su lugar y a rechaza e apelacion di e abogadonan. Mientrastanto huez-comisario a alarga e termino menciona cu ocho dia mas.Den e caso contra J. v.d. S. a pidi Corte Comun pa suaviza e restriccionnan (ningun contacto cu hende, otro cu su abogado, no telefon, no cartanan, corant, revista of television) cu a wordo poni na dje.

Concretamente a pidi pa permiti bishita (su mama y ruman homber, un otro abogado y amigonan), pa dune un Bijbel y otro lectura y pa lague haci deporte. KIA a mientrastanto, tambe riba peticion di Ministerio Publico, percura pa un Bijbel y lectura. Corte Comun a rechaza ayera e apelacion contra e restriccionnan den interes di e investigacion.

Online Pap translation:

corte comun owing to rechaza apelacion of
abogadonan of d.k. in caso holloway owing to mantgene majority of restriccionnan
contra j. v.d. s.


oranjestad(aan)--ayera corte comun of husticia owing to dicidi on two apelacion separa cu owing to wordo entrega for abogadonan of the sospechosonan d.k. y j. v.d. s. in the caso holloway. d.k. y j. v.d. s. is wordo sospecha, together cu the of three sospechoso s.k., of dead of natalee holloway or of provided that todo caso maltrato of such form cu owing to take away at his dead.

yesterday the apelacionnan here owing to wordo deal behind door close.den the caso contra d.k., huez-comisario owing to give ordo, on peticion of ministerio publico, for deny the abogadonan kock, wix y zeppenveldt acceso at the sospechoso d.k. for one duracion of eight day. till ultimo the abogadonan kock, wix y zeppenveldt owing to representa the rumannan k. because; equipment.

ministerio publico owing to ask for her ordo here owing to base of the suspicion cu d.k. will can is hayando informacion tocante the investigacion cu will have to wordo teni for of dje or cu the investigacion for arrive at the berdad will can wordo stroba.

the suspicion here is basa on informacion for of raport of police cu is give sosten at the teoria cu much time happen, d.k. owing to word cu his brother s.k. tocante they posicion in the investigacion. on dje ministerio publico owing to ripara cu the sospechosonan is ahusta they declaracionnan at another. this together cu the mature cu both sospechoso is wordo representa for her self equipment of advocate owing to haci cu ministerio publico owing to ask for her ordo.

huez-comisario owing to follow the argumentonan of ministerio publico y owing to give ordo cu the three abogadonan not can visit they cliente d.k. the abogadonan owing to apela the decision here close corte comun. actualmente they're representa only s.k. on peticion of the abogadonan menciona, d.k. is wordo representa for one another advocate by week happen.

corte comun owing to dicidi today cu the ordo of huez-comisario is at his lugar y owing to rechaza the apelacion of the abogadonan. all the time huez-comisario owing to alarga the termino menciona cu eight day more.den the caso contra j. v.d. s. owing to ask corte comun for suaviza the restriccionnan (ningun contacto cu person, another cu his advocate, not telephone, not cartanan, corant, magazine or television) cu owing to wordo poni at dje.

concretamente owing to ask for permiti visit (su mother y brother man, one another advocate y amigonan), for dune one bijbel y another lectura y for lague haci sport. kia owing to all the time, also on peticion of ministerio publico, percura for one bijbel y lectura. corte comun owing to rechaza yesterday the apelacion contra the restriccionnan in interest of the investigacion.

* * *




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Buckeye on December 01, 2007, 07:31:36 AM
Just wanted to add that I hope someone here can get the full Enlgish version of Art's letter to Jossy - the one Jossy published 11/30/2007. Also would like to know its date.

I can't even find the pap version of the Art Wood letter.   :roll:

Found Wood letter but link pulls up as totally white box when clicked.  Couldn't see any date.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Magnolia on December 01, 2007, 07:33:46 AM
"And can Tacopina explain to us how his client did the miracle of letting his shoes grow from size 11 to size 14 in one night? "

This is my favorite line from Jossy's editorial about Tacopina


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: msmarple on December 01, 2007, 07:35:05 AM
Just wanted to add that I hope someone here can get the full Enlgish version of Art's letter to Jossy - the one Jossy published 11/30/2007. Also would like to know its date.

I can't even find the pap version of the Art Wood letter.   :roll:

Buckeye - I promise you, it IS in that lengthy post of mine from Diario's 11/30/2007 edition. However, here is just that part of the post:

Quote
Jossy, E ultimo noticia ta conmove mi curazon y ta recorda mi con duro a bo, Eduardo y mi persona a traha pa trece e caso aki den husticia.
Mi ta spera tur cos ta bon
 
Apreciado Jossy Mansur,

E re-aresto di Joran Van der Sloot y rumannan Kalpoe ta pone Aruba un biaha mas den spotlight mundial, locual ta pone mas atencion y emocion relaciona cu e desaparicion di Natalee Holloway. Mientras mi ta hala atras y cuidadosamente ta observa e ultimo eventonan tumando lugar, mi mester admiti cu mi ta un poco mas esceptico relaciona cu e intencion di Aruba pa resolve e caso aki.

Por fabor tuma nota cu mi a referi na “intencion” di Aruba\' y no su \"Abilidad\" pa resolve e caso di Natalee Holloway. E pueblo di Aruba merece pa haya sa e berdad den e tragedia aki y no worde mal-informa pa media of su Gobierno. Ta pesey mi ta skirbi esaki. Mi kier pa pueblo di Aruba cuestiona e sinceridad di algun autoridad envolvi y no worde ciega pa miedo di publicidad negativo.

Durante e curso di e investigacion aki, mi a bira amigo personal di bo y bo yiu Eduardo, como tambe Dave Holloway.Mi por declara sin duda ningun cu nos intencion y obhetivonan tabata sali for di nos curazon pa e deseo di encontra Natalee.

Den un bida henter trahando como oficial di polis mi ta haya cu e oficialnan di polis di Aruba cu mi por a conoce ta polisnan capaz, competente y profesional. Aunke, manera bo por corda, consistentemente y repetidamente mi a laga sa mi preocupacion relaciona cu e rol di Dennis Jacobs, un agente den departamento di narcotico, pa su asignacion den e caso como investigador principal, pa e Comisario Van der Straaten. Aruba tin detectivenan cu experiencia den casonan di homicidio y desaparicion di personanan. Di con nan no a haya e oportunidad pa resolve e caso aki. Van der Straaten mes a trece duda den e caso cu su amistad personal cu Paulus Van der Sloot.

Un duda cu nunca a termina cu su retiro, mientras Dave Holloway y mi persona a descubri cu e tabata reuni regularmente cu Jacobs y e Comisario Dompig lunanan durante e investigacion. Esey lo por ta apenas un coincidencia of nan por tin un amistad tambe, pero nos a haya esaki inusual. Mi criticanan di Jacobs a worde bon documenta y mi no ta bay ripiti esaki.

El a worde pasa den mannan di e Prome Minister y Procurador General di Aruba, hunto cu un peticion pa kita Jacobs y Dompig for di e caso. Famianan Holloway y Twitty tambe a tuma parti na e peticion aki.

Na October 2005 Dave Holloway y mi persona a reuni den secreto cu Fiscal Amolyn Flanegin. Nos a haci esaki cu conocimento y permiso di e Procurador General. E meta di e reunion aki tabata pa vocifera nos preocupacion relaciona cu e iregularidadnan cu Dennis Jacobs y Comisario Dompig a mustra durante e curso di e investigacion y nos peticion pa Landsrecherche investiga e dos agentenan aki.

Ami cu Dave a duna Comisario Dompig un pista persuasivo relaciona cu amigo di Joran, Koen Gottenbos y nos tabata sinti cu Gottenbos lo por ta un clave pa resolve e caso. Yiu adolescente di Comisario Dompig a bisa Dave Holloway cu Paulus Van der Sloot aparentemente a fia un boto rond di e lapso di tempo di desaparicion di Natalee. Ami y Dave a haya sa cu e boto tabata di tata di Koen Gottenbos y cu Koen tabata tin miedo di worde aresta. Asina hopi cu e anochi e tabata drumi hunto cu su mayornan riba cama.

Durante e curso di e reunion aki Fiscal Flanegin a bisa nos cu el a resigna for di e caso di Holloway pa motibo di respuesta negativo di (Jacobs y Dompig) pa sigui cu e pistanan relaciona cu Gottenbos. Specificamente cu Koen Gottenbos a suministra Joran cu un alibi ficticio pa e anochi di 31 di Mei, 2005. Flanegin a bisa \"sigui e mentiranan y lo bo descubri e berdad.\"

Dos aña a pasa y nos no tin motibo pa kere cu polis a investiga nos peticion pa bay tras di Koen Gottenbos. Nos a haya sa awo cu evidencianan nobo a sali afo di via yamadanan di telefon y e-mails. Mi por bisabo cu Koen Gottenbos a e-mail Joran tur dia!Mi ta spera y reza cu mi escepticismo ta innecesario y cu husticia lo prevalece.

Dios bendiciona pueblo di Aruba.

Arthur E. Wood

(Arthur E. Wood ta un ex agente special di Servicio Secreto, kende a protehe Presidentenan Ford, Carter, Reagan, Bush y Clinton. El a worde honra como Oficial di Polis di aña, pa e Asociacion Internacional di Investigadornan di Credit Card na 1986 y ta un autor y ta conoci pa promove derechonan di victimanan.)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Buckeye on December 01, 2007, 07:36:43 AM
"And can Tacopina explain to us how his client did the miracle of letting his shoes grow from size 11 to size 14 in one night? "

This is my favorite line from Jossy's editorial about Tacopina


Klaas should have sent him the picture of Joran, with two different sized shoes, to include in the paper. :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: msmarple on December 01, 2007, 07:38:39 AM
Just wanted to add that I hope someone here can get the full Enlgish version of Art's letter to Jossy - the one Jossy published 11/30/2007. Also would like to know its date.

I can't even find the pap version of the Art Wood letter.   :roll:

Found Wood letter but link pulls up as totally white box when clicked.  Couldn't see any date.

That's what I tried to explain. On the "front" page, Diario runs the entire letter in Papiamentu, and then shows the first two paragraphs in English. But when you click to read more, the page comes up blank. It's possible this will be corrected later in the day.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Buckeye on December 01, 2007, 07:39:04 AM
msmarple

I could read what you posted.  I was trying to find the original so I could see if I could capture the English version for you.  See my following post.  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 01, 2007, 07:42:21 AM
I cannot bear the thought of that big ugly, pimply faced, big-busted, hog legged Joran and what he did to Natalee.  It makes me despise him so much and the thought of that sweaty daddy of his, who might be necrophiliac for all we know.  They may have an obsession about having sex with corpses.  We don't know what kind of sick people they are but they look dreadfully mentally deranged.  Joran's eyes look evil and one of them is bigger than the other, almost like a cyclops head.


 :cyclops: :cyclopsani: :cyclops:
Morning all


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: msmarple on December 01, 2007, 07:44:35 AM
msmarple

I could read what you posted.  I was trying to find the original so I could see if I could capture the English version for you.  See my following post.  :wink:

OK, gottcha. You're having the same problem I did!

We'll check back a little later. Diario doesn't update during the day, but sometimes it "fixes" things like broken links, etc.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: msmarple on December 01, 2007, 07:51:53 AM
msmarple

I could read what you posted.  I was trying to find the original so I could see if I could capture the English version for you.  See my following post.  :wink:

OK, gottcha. You're having the same problem I did!

We'll check back a little later. Diario doesn't update during the day, but sometimes it "fixes" things like broken links, etc.

OR - maybe you need to know about "Notica Local". When you click on the Diario link - http://www.diario-aruba.com/2007/11/30/ (http://www.diario-aruba.com/2007/11/30/) - look at the top line in the left box, under "Notica". Click on "Notica Local". That takes you to the local notices of importance (as compared to Politics, Sports, etc.)

You are correct that the letter from Art isn't shown at all in the initial "splash" screen that you get when you first click on the Diario link.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: msmarple on December 01, 2007, 08:01:53 AM
This may already have been posted; apologies if so.

http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/americas/11/30/aruba.holloway/index.html (http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/americas/11/30/aruba.holloway/index.html)

Brothers to be freed in Natalee Holloway case
     
ORANJESTAD, Aruba (CNN) -- Two of the suspects being held in connection with Natalee Holloway's presumed death will be released from custody by Saturday.

Prosecutors wanted Deepak and Satish Kalpoe held in Aruba for another eight days, but a judge rejected their request Friday.

The decision was "a bit of a setback," said Hans Mos, Aruba's chief public prosecutor. But it does not change his plan to decide by the end of the year whether to prosecute anyone in the Holloway case.

"We had hoped for a longer period to confront these suspects with the material we have against them, but this is the way the law says it must go," Mos said. 

Holloway's parents are expected to meet with Mos on Saturday. The prosecutor said he will explain to them what happened, "if I can explain it. I hope I can."

Deepak Kalpoe's defense attorney, meanwhile, said his client is "really happy to recover his freedom after 10 days in jail."

Prosecutors have three days to appeal the decision and will decide Monday whether or not to do so.

A third man, Joran van der Sloot, is still being held in the case. Van der Sloot is set to appear before a judge December 7, and prosecutors have said they are considering requesting that he be detained another 60 days.

The Kalpoe brothers were previously jailed in the case, but were rearrested last week and charged with being involved in the "voluntary manslaughter" of Holloway.

The judge reasoned Friday that "the new evidence, together with the existing evidence in this case, produce serious grounds for the suspicion of some kind of aiding and abetting, of covering up the traces of a crime committed or of the disposing of a corpse," prosecutors said.

But people accused of those crimes do not qualify for pretrial detention under Aruban law, Mos told reporters. He noted that on Monday, the same judge approved van der Sloot's continuing detention based on the same evidence.

"Apparently, the judge sees a difference between the third suspect and these two suspects," Mos said, since the judge concluded the evidence against the Kalpoes was not strong enough to warrant their continued detention.

When the arrests took place November 21, prosecutors said they had new incriminating evidence against the three men.

They were the last people seen with Holloway, 18, as she left an Oranjestad nightclub on May 30, 2005. She was on a trip to Aruba with about 100 classmates celebrating their graduation from Mountain Brook High School in suburban Birmingham, Alabama. 

The three have maintained their innocence in her disappearance.

The Kalpoes have told police they dropped Holloway and van der Sloot off near a lighthouse on the northern tip of the island after they left the nightclub. Van der Sloot's mother, Anita, has said her son told her he was on the beach with Holloway but left her there because she wanted to stay.

Mos has told CNN he believes authorities have enough evidence to prove Holloway is dead, even if her body is never found. He has suggested her death was an accident.

The new evidence against the three men was gathered from advanced techniques used to re-examine existing information, including cell phone records and text messages exchanged the night Holloway disappeared, Mos has said.

Investigators also returned to the homes of the suspects to try to re-create transmissions. The team also discovered that some existing evidence was improperly analyzed.

Defense attorneys for the Kalpoes and van der Sloot have said the prosecutors' evidence is flimsy. "To say it's less than nothing is too much," van der Sloot's lawyer, Ariean de Bie, told CNN.

In Aruba, authorities can make an arrest if they have reasonable suspicion that someone knows about or is involved in a crime. Magistrates investigate cases, and judges determine a suspect's guilt or innocence. There are no jury trials.


Title: Good Morning Monkeys
Post by: Leslie on December 01, 2007, 08:05:13 AM
Diario
http://www.diarioaruba.com/
Amigoe
http://www.amigoe.com/english/
BonDia
http://www.cspnv.com/
Solo di Pueblo
http://www.solodipueblo.com/
Aruba Today
http://www.arubatoday.com/
24ora
http://www.24ora.com/
Translator:
http://papiamentu.donamaro.nl


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: igsigs on December 01, 2007, 08:19:08 AM
Per Ramm / Dutch Media - Restrictions on Joran upheld, no visitors...etc...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: sharon on December 01, 2007, 08:21:51 AM
Oh me too Klaas. I just had a sigh of relief, but can still hardly think. The word cruelty is pounding in my brain...cruelty. :smt022  :smt009

I'm nowhere near 'catching up' (as usual) -- but the word pounding in my brain is M A F I A  :-x

Just the presence of Joe T 'as a consultant' to the Aruban defense team has told me that all along.

And what a coincidence that Joe T is on his way to Aruba -- just as Mos is 'surprised' by this ridiculous (but predictable) release of K2.

I haven't seen this morning news from Aruba, yet -- but did anyone accidentally hang themselves with ther hand in their pocket?

And although the skank may be elated by the news of the k2 release -- I wouldn't be. Skanky -- you were hired to make this go away over 2 years ago -- and you failed. Maybe you should start sleeping with one eye open.





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Pita on December 01, 2007, 08:25:23 AM
Posted yesterday by Ramm @ BFN.....

just read on Dutch news media sources, the DA is going to appeal the decision of the judge today.

http://blogsfornatalee.com/forum/index.php?topic=7924.msg294590#msg294590


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: blah on December 01, 2007, 08:31:55 AM
DATE: Nov 30, 20:01

By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

ORANJESTAD, Aruba – Two brothers re-arrested last week as suspects in the disappearance of American teenager Natalee Holloway will be released from jail, a prosecutor said Friday.

The two brothers, Satish and Deepak Kalpoe, will be released by Saturday, prosecutor Dop Kruimel said.

“We have three days to launch an appeal, but we have to think about it,” Kruimel said.
The prosecutor corrected a statement made earlier by Vinda de Sousa, a lawyer for Dave Holloway, Natalee’s father, who said they had already been released due to lack of evidence.

Their release will mark the third time that the brothers have been arrested and later released in the case. Both have denied having any role in her disappearance.

They and a third suspect who remains in jail, Joran van der Sloot, were the last known people to see Holloway alive before she vanished on May 30, 2005, hours before she was scheduled to return home to Alabama with fellow high school classmates celebrating their graduation. She was 18 at the time.

The three suspects were re-arrested on Nov. 21 on suspicion of involvement in Holloway’s death. Authorities said they had “new incriminating evidence, but defence lawyers had complained that the new material amounted to little more than misunderstandings in the suspects’ recorded conversations.

Van der Sloot’s mother said Friday that she was happy for the Kalpoe brothers but did not whether the rulings mean anything for her son’s case.

“I’m happy that something is happening,” she said.


ok,  I might have had a drink or 2 too much last night and I have not had any coffee yet so, am I reading this correctly?

The prosecution can protest the Kalpoes release?  That is great!!

I think if they have more evidence on them, they would protest this release.

But then again, maybe they wouldnt.  If they have evidence that they dont want Joran to find out about yet, they might not protest.  Does anyone agree?

This could be one hell of a cat and mouse game.  The corrupt judge from Curacao could have released the Kalpoes just to try and force Mos's hand and show them what evidence he really has.  If Mos needs to interrogate the Kalpoes even more, he just might have to give up some more evidence to get them locked back up.

Is it possible for Mos to just go ahead and charge the Kalpoes without giving up more evidence to the crooked judges of Curaco???

Does anything I said even make sense? Wheres my coffee??  and an asprin  :smt095


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: blah on December 01, 2007, 08:35:15 AM
HOW DARE THEY DO THIS TO THE FAMILY......AGAIN!  I HOPE THAT EVERYBODY ON WHOLE DAMN ISLAND STARVES TO DEATH.

Hell yeah JU JU, Let them Starve!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: blah on December 01, 2007, 08:39:28 AM
Per Ramm / Dutch Media - Restrictions on Joran upheld, no visitors...etc...

This is great news if it is actually enforced!!!!!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: blah on December 01, 2007, 08:40:35 AM
Posted yesterday by Ramm @ BFN.....

just read on Dutch news media sources, the DA is going to appeal the decision of the judge today.

http://blogsfornatalee.com/forum/index.php?topic=7924.msg294590#msg294590

more good news!!!!!

All is not lot yet!!!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: blah on December 01, 2007, 08:42:29 AM
ok, so it seems there is one more ruling outstading -
whether or not the K2's can use the same lawyer.

Have we heard anything about this yet?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: wreck on December 01, 2007, 08:44:08 AM
Note to Anna,

I absolutely agree with you that the actual crime was "ordinary" and "garden variety" in nature involving a small # of people. I do differ with you in that I think the COVERUP was HUGE -- involving the Arubian Government all the way up to Oduber.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: igsigs on December 01, 2007, 08:47:30 AM
Blah - i was just thinkin the same. Maybe Mos took a risk - and held back evidence that would have extended the Kalpoe stint - and will present it today. The Paulus $$$ grab was overturned on appeal with new evidence.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: blah on December 01, 2007, 08:49:31 AM
It is true that Joran is already one his second 8 day extension, correct?

That must mean that they have presented more evidence to keep him in jail?

Do we know if the judge the judge that let the K's out it the same judge that approved Jorans seconds 8 day extension?

Do we know any of the judges names this time around?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: blah on December 01, 2007, 08:52:41 AM
Note to Anna,

I absolutely agree with you that the actual crime was "ordinary" and "garden variety" in nature involving a small # of people. I do differ with you in that I think the COVERUP was HUGE -- involving the Arubian Government all the way up to Oduber.


 :smt045 :smt045 :smt045 :smt045 :smt045

the actual crimes against Natalee should have been simple and quick to solve.  Its just pushing this thing through all of the corruption is the complicated part!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: igsigs on December 01, 2007, 08:53:13 AM
Joran is on his second 8 days. And Mos said it was based on the same info that they used for the Kalpoes. I don't know the rest.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Silverfox on December 01, 2007, 08:54:00 AM
Crooked Judges... :roll:

Is there any doubt?  The world has it's eyes upon you  Aruba...!!!

Of course we all understand that the judges, themselves are not from Aruba... what does that tell us?

It tells us that there is an organized conspiracy that goes to the highest levels of government...

A house of cards must come tumbling down...

the King of Spades is out trumped by the Ace of Spades, the death card.

The time is right, for truth, not manufacture...to reveal it's most intimate secrets...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: blah on December 01, 2007, 08:54:33 AM
Did Mos ever do his press conference yesterday?  Anyone hear anything from that?

I REALLY need to hear this guys response before I jump on his bandwagon.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: blah on December 01, 2007, 08:57:53 AM
Is it also true that JQK is on the island?

If true, this makes me feel good.  No ones pulling any bullshit past John.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: MumInOhio on December 01, 2007, 09:01:42 AM
Is it also true that JQK is on the island?

If true, this makes me feel good.  No ones pulling any bullshit past John.

It was posted last night that he was.

Judges Jossy said there are 2 judges, one for Joran and one for the Kalpoes but still no names. It was posted last week, from Pearl at BFN, that Judge Smid is one of them. There is a photo of the judge leaving the courthouse yesterday, but as we haven’t a photo of Judge Smid, we still don’t know which case he is hearing. Would feel much better if I knew that one of the other judges and not Judge Smid was hearing Joran’s case. I don’t understand why they are being so secretive about the judges.

Pita..Thanks for bringing Ramm's posts over.





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 01, 2007, 09:02:19 AM
I cannot bear the thought of that big ugly, pimply faced, big-busted, hog legged Joran and what he did to Natalee.  It makes me despise him so much and the thought of that sweaty daddy of his, who might be necrophiliac for all we know.  They may have an obsession about having sex with corpses.  We don't know what kind of sick people they are but they look dreadfully mentally deranged.  Joran's eyes look evil and one of them is bigger than the other, almost like a cyclops head.


 :cyclops: :cyclopsani: :cyclops:
Morning all
Morning Nut, morning Monkeys!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 01, 2007, 09:04:11 AM
Is it also true that JQK is on the island?

If true, this makes me feel good.  No ones pulling any bullshit past John.

It was posted last night that he was.

Judges Jossy said there are 2 judges, one for Joran and one for the Kalpoes but still no names. It was posted last week, from Pearl at BFN, that Judge Smid is one of them. There is a photo of the judge leaving the courthouse yesterday, but as we haven’t a photo of Judge Smid, we still don’t know which case he is hearing. Would feel much better if I knew that one of the other judges and not Judge Smid was hearing Joran’s case. I don’t understand why they are being so secretive about the judges.

Pita..Thanks for bringing Ramm's posts over.





I thought it was said these were two new judges that no one knew, that were chosen because they were supposed to be impartial?!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: blah on December 01, 2007, 09:05:31 AM
Crooked Judges... :roll:

Is there any doubt?  The world has it's eyes upon you  Aruba...!!!

Of course we all understand that the judges, themselves are not from Aruba... what does that tell us?

It tells us that there is an organized conspiracy that goes to the highest levels of government...

A house of cards must come tumbling down...

the King of Spades is out trumped by the Ace of Spades, the death card.

The time is right, for truth, not manufacture...to reveal it's most intimate secrets...


Silverfox, I agree.

If Mos is The Real Deal, and he is serious about nailing all involved, the whole house needs to come down.

In order to do that he is going to need alot of support from the people.  He would have to find a way to rally the people of Aruba and get them to stand behind him  This almost seems to be an impossible task as they all seem to be too stoned or stuck with their head buried in the sand most of the time.

Is there any way for Mos to get these people off their ass and rally some support?  Is that what its going to take to bring this kind of corruption down?  Large protests outside the courthouse?  Burn these judges houses down?  Throw the tea in the drink?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 01, 2007, 09:05:52 AM
It is true that Joran is already one his second 8 day extension, correct?

That must mean that they have presented more evidence to keep him in jail?

Do we know if the judge the judge that let the K's out it the same judge that approved Jorans seconds 8 day extension?

Do we know any of the judges names this time around?

I recall either Mos or Jossy, I think it was Mos, saying it was the same judge.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: MumInOhio on December 01, 2007, 09:09:04 AM
Is it also true that JQK is on the island?

If true, this makes me feel good.  No ones pulling any bullshit past John.

It was posted last night that he was.

Judges Jossy said there are 2 judges, one for Joran and one for the Kalpoes but still no names. It was posted last week, from Pearl at BFN, that Judge Smid is one of them. There is a photo of the judge leaving the courthouse yesterday, but as we haven’t a photo of Judge Smid, we still don’t know which case he is hearing. Would feel much better if I knew that one of the other judges and not Judge Smid was hearing Joran’s case. I don’t understand why they are being so secretive about the judges.

Pita..Thanks for bringing Ramm's posts over.





I thought it was said these were two new judges that no one knew, that were chosen because they were supposed to be impartial?!


Anna posted per pearl@BFN that one was Smid. I am not a member so didn't see it myself. Maybe Pita can help!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 01, 2007, 09:09:47 AM
Crooked Judges... :roll:

Is there any doubt?  The world has it's eyes upon you  Aruba...!!!

Of course we all understand that the judges, themselves are not from Aruba... what does that tell us?

It tells us that there is an organized conspiracy that goes to the highest levels of government...

A house of cards must come tumbling down...

the King of Spades is out trumped by the Ace of Spades, the death card.

The time is right, for truth, not manufacture...to reveal it's most intimate secrets...


Silverfox, I agree.

If Mos is The Real Deal, and he is serious about nailing all involved, the whole house needs to come down.

In order to do that he is going to need alot of support from the people.  He would have to find a way to rally the people of Aruba and get them to stand behind him  This almost seems to be an impossible task as they all seem to be too stoned or stuck with their head buried in the sand most of the time.

Is there any way for Mos to get these people off their ass and rally some support?  Is that what its going to take to bring this kind of corruption down?  Large protests outside the courthouse?  Burn these judges houses down?  Throw the tea in the drink?

You know, all Mos knows of Beth and Dave is what he has heard on the island....and we know what people like renho have said about Beth and Dave. I am so so glad Beth decided to stay and meet with Mos!!! Mos seems like an honest man, and after sitting across from Beth and Dave and looking into their eyes, and seeing the pain in their faces, I believe it will renew his energy and determination to put away the j2k and paulus for taking our beloved Natalee away from her family.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: San on December 01, 2007, 09:11:02 AM
There was an article in todays paper and in one paragraph it said the following:

"It says Prosecutor Dop Kruimel said she hasn't decided whether to appeal the decision to release the men." 

Who is Dos Kruimel I never heard of her before and is she the one actually going to court and presenting the case to the judge.  I would think a case this big you would have your so called bigs guns handling it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 01, 2007, 09:11:58 AM
Crooked Judges... :roll:

Is there any doubt?  The world has it's eyes upon you  Aruba...!!!

Of course we all understand that the judges, themselves are not from Aruba... what does that tell us?

It tells us that there is an organized conspiracy that goes to the highest levels of government...

A house of cards must come tumbling down...

the King of Spades is out trumped by the Ace of Spades, the death card.

The time is right, for truth, not manufacture...to reveal it's most intimate secrets...


Silverfox, I agree.

If Mos is The Real Deal, and he is serious about nailing all involved, the whole house needs to come down.

In order to do that he is going to need alot of support from the people.  He would have to find a way to rally the people of Aruba and get them to stand behind him  This almost seems to be an impossible task as they all seem to be too stoned or stuck with their head buried in the sand most of the time.

Is there any way for Mos to get these people off their ass and rally some support?  Is that what its going to take to bring this kind of corruption down?  Large protests outside the courthouse?  Burn these judges houses down?  Throw the tea in the drink?

You know, all Mos knows of Beth and Dave is what he has heard on the island....and we know what people like renho have said about Beth and Dave. I am so so glad Beth decided to stay and meet with Mos!!! Mos seems like an honest man, and after sitting across from Beth and Dave and looking into their eyes, and seeing the pain in their faces, I believe it will renew his energy and determination to put away the j2k and paulus for taking our beloved Natalee away from her family.

Beth and Dave are the voice and face of Natalee, may God give them strength to humanize Natalee to Mos, so he comes to know and love Natalee as we do, and will pick up the fight for her as we have!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: blah on December 01, 2007, 09:14:05 AM
It is true that Joran is already one his second 8 day extension, correct?

That must mean that they have presented more evidence to keep him in jail?

Do we know if the judge the judge that let the K's out it the same judge that approved Jorans seconds 8 day extension?

Do we know any of the judges names this time around?

I recall either Mos or Jossy, I think it was Mos, saying it was the same judge.

this is the 3rd different answer to this question.

I guess what that means is they are trying to keep us confused as to which judge is doing what.

I dont blame them.  If I were a corrupt judge, i'd do the same thing.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: MumInOhio on December 01, 2007, 09:15:06 AM
There was an article in todays paper and in one paragraph it said the following:

"It says Prosecutor Dop Kruimel said she hasn't decided whether to appeal the decision to release the men." 

Who is Dos Kruimel I never heard of her before and is she the one actually going to court and presenting the case to the judge.  I would think a case this big you would have your so called bigs guns handling it.

San  Sorry to say that NYC_lover posted the other day and compared this bod to KJ!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: adoronron on December 01, 2007, 09:15:55 AM
There was an article in todays paper and in one paragraph it said the following:

"It says Prosecutor Dop Kruimel said she hasn't decided whether to appeal the decision to release the men." 

Who is Dos Kruimel I never heard of her before and is she the one actually going to court and presenting the case to the judge.  I would think a case this big you would have your so called bigs guns handling it.

In his interview with Greta several days ago MOS mentioned something about the prosecutor he has in charge of this case. He refered to this prosecutor as a female.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: igsigs on December 01, 2007, 09:15:58 AM
Dop is a she?  :idea:

I don't know if she is just a spokesperson or not. Mos referred to the lead prosecutor as a she...but i was thinking he was talking about Lugo.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: MumInOhio on December 01, 2007, 09:18:44 AM
JOSSY:  Does not know the names of the judges.  There were 2.  One for Joran and one for K2's

Bringing this forward from Dana's show last night.

Yes..NYC said female, may have posted a pic!...sorry senior moment!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: blah on December 01, 2007, 09:18:55 AM
There was an article in todays paper and in one paragraph it said the following:

"It says Prosecutor Dop Kruimel said she hasn't decided whether to appeal the decision to release the men." 

Who is Dos Kruimel I never heard of her before and is she the one actually going to court and presenting the case to the judge.  I would think a case this big you would have your so called bigs guns handling it.

I remember seeing an interview with Moss within the last week where he was asked the question if he were involved in interrogating the Kalpoes.  He said no, he was overseeing someone that was doing it.  I dont remember his exact words but he did make it clear that it was a female who was working with the detectives to do the interrogations.  I think Dos is who he was referring to.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 01, 2007, 09:23:04 AM
It is true that Joran is already one his second 8 day extension, correct?

That must mean that they have presented more evidence to keep him in jail?

Do we know if the judge the judge that let the K's out it the same judge that approved Jorans seconds 8 day extension?

Do we know any of the judges names this time around?

I recall either Mos or Jossy, I think it was Mos, saying it was the same judge.

this is the 3rd different answer to this question.

I guess what that means is they are trying to keep us confused as to which judge is doing what.

I dont blame them.  If I were a corrupt judge, i'd do the same thing.

ORANJESTAD, Aruba (CNN) -- Two of the suspects being held in connection with Natalee Holloway's presumed death will be released from custody by Saturday.

Prosecutors wanted Deepak and Satish Kalpoe held in Aruba for another eight days, but a judge rejected their request Friday.

The decision was "a bit of a setback," said Hans Mos, Aruba's chief public prosecutor. But it does not change his plan to decide by the end of the year whether to prosecute anyone in the Holloway case.

"We had hoped for a longer period to confront these suspects with the material we have against them, but this is the way the law says it must go," Mos said. Watch the prosecutor's reaction »

Holloway's parents are expected to meet with Mos on Saturday. The prosecutor said he will explain to them what happened, "if I can explain it. I hope I can."

Deepak Kalpoe's defense attorney, meanwhile, said his client is "really happy to recover his freedom after 10 days in jail."

Prosecutors have three days to appeal the decision and will decide Monday whether or not to do so.

A third man, Joran van der Sloot, is still being held in the case. Van der Sloot is set to appear before a judge December 7, and prosecutors have said they are considering requesting that he be detained another 60 days.

The Kalpoe brothers were previously jailed in the case, but were rearrested last week and charged with being involved in the "voluntary manslaughter" of Holloway.

The judge reasoned Friday that "the new evidence, together with the existing evidence in this case, produce serious grounds for the suspicion of some kind of aiding and abetting, of covering up the traces of a crime committed or of the disposing of a corpse," prosecutors said.

But people accused of those crimes do not qualify for pretrial detention under Aruban law, Mos told reporters. He noted that on Monday, the same judge approved van der Sloot's continuing detention based on the same evidence.  

"Apparently, the judge sees a difference between the third suspect and these two suspects," Mos said, since the judge concluded the evidence against the Kalpoes was not strong enough to warrant their continued detention.

When the arrests took place November 21, prosecutors said they had new incriminating evidence against the three men.

They were the last people seen with Holloway, 18, as she left an Oranjestad nightclub on May 30, 2005. She was on a trip to Aruba with about 100 classmates celebrating their graduation from Mountain Brook High School in suburban Birmingham, Alabama. See a timeline of the case »

have maintained their innocence in her disappearance.

The Kalpoes have told police they dropped Holloway and van der Sloot off near a lighthouse on the northern tip of the island after they left the nightclub. Van der Sloot's mother, Anita, has said her son told her he was on the beach with Holloway but left her there because she wanted to stay.

Mos has told CNN he believes authorities have enough evidence to prove Holloway is dead, even if her body is never found. He has suggested her death was an accident.

The new evidence against the three men was gathered from advanced techniques used to re-examine existing information, including cell phone records and text messages exchanged the night Holloway disappeared, Mos has said.

Investigators also returned to the homes of the suspects to try to re-create transmissions. The team also discovered that some existing evidence was improperly analyzed.

Defense attorneys for the Kalpoes and van der Sloot have said the prosecutors' evidence is flimsy. "To say it's less than nothing is too much," van der Sloot's lawyer, Ariean de Bie, told CNN.

In Aruba, authorities can make an arrest if they have reasonable suspicion that someone knows about or is involved in a crime. Magistrates investigate cases, and judges determine a suspect's guilt or innocence. There are no jury trials.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: AnnieMW1 on December 01, 2007, 09:24:46 AM
Good Morning Monkeys!

Blah - Love your posts, but your moniker is NOT GOOD for hang-over recovery!  Whew...looking at all your posts this a.m. is intensifying my post-vodka tonic state of being this morning!   :wink:

Good news re: no goods for Joran except the Bible.

Will be interesting to hear what comes out of today's meeting with the prosecutor.  I think he's serious...just not sure what obstacles he's up against.  And of course, we CERTAINLY don't understand their system.  If he is playing a game of cat-and-mouse with the evidence, we have NO IDEA whether that's going on or how it's aiding or hampering the whole process.  Kierkegaard's leap of faith may be in order here re: believing in Mos.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Buckeye on December 01, 2007, 09:25:18 AM
Dop is a she?  :idea:

I don't know if she is just a spokesperson or not. Mos referred to the lead prosecutor as a she...but i was thinking he was talking about Lugo.

An early Dutch report referred to her as a Press Officer in office of OM.   :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: San on December 01, 2007, 09:27:32 AM
Thank you everyone for your answer.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: wreck on December 01, 2007, 09:28:32 AM
It is true that Joran is already one his second 8 day extension, correct?

That must mean that they have presented more evidence to keep him in jail?

Do we know if the judge the judge that let the K's out it the same judge that approved Jorans seconds 8 day extension?

Do we know any of the judges names this time around?

I recall either Mos or Jossy, I think it was Mos, saying it was the same judge.

this is the 3rd different answer to this question.

I guess what that means is they are trying to keep us confused as to which judge is doing what.

I dont blame them.  If I were a corrupt judge, i'd do the same thing.

ORANJESTAD, Aruba (CNN) -- Two of the suspects being held in connection with Natalee Holloway's presumed death will be released from custody by Saturday.

Prosecutors wanted Deepak and Satish Kalpoe held in Aruba for another eight days, but a judge rejected their request Friday.

The decision was "a bit of a setback," said Hans Mos, Aruba's chief public prosecutor. But it does not change his plan to decide by the end of the year whether to prosecute anyone in the Holloway case.

"We had hoped for a longer period to confront these suspects with the material we have against them, but this is the way the law says it must go," Mos said. Watch the prosecutor's reaction »

Holloway's parents are expected to meet with Mos on Saturday. The prosecutor said he will explain to them what happened, "if I can explain it. I hope I can."

Deepak Kalpoe's defense attorney, meanwhile, said his client is "really happy to recover his freedom after 10 days in jail."

Prosecutors have three days to appeal the decision and will decide Monday whether or not to do so.

A third man, Joran van der Sloot, is still being held in the case. Van der Sloot is set to appear before a judge December 7, and prosecutors have said they are considering requesting that he be detained another 60 days.

The Kalpoe brothers were previously jailed in the case, but were rearrested last week and charged with being involved in the "voluntary manslaughter" of Holloway.

The judge reasoned Friday that "the new evidence, together with the existing evidence in this case, produce serious grounds for the suspicion of some kind of aiding and abetting, of covering up the traces of a crime committed or of the disposing of a corpse," prosecutors said.

But people accused of those crimes do not qualify for pretrial detention under Aruban law, Mos told reporters. He noted that on Monday, the same judge approved van der Sloot's continuing detention based on the same evidence.  

"Apparently, the judge sees a difference between the third suspect and these two suspects," Mos said, since the judge concluded the evidence against the Kalpoes was not strong enough to warrant their continued detention.

When the arrests took place November 21, prosecutors said they had new incriminating evidence against the three men.

They were the last people seen with Holloway, 18, as she left an Oranjestad nightclub on May 30, 2005. She was on a trip to Aruba with about 100 classmates celebrating their graduation from Mountain Brook High School in suburban Birmingham, Alabama. See a timeline of the case »

have maintained their innocence in her disappearance.

The Kalpoes have told police they dropped Holloway and van der Sloot off near a lighthouse on the northern tip of the island after they left the nightclub. Van der Sloot's mother, Anita, has said her son told her he was on the beach with Holloway but left her there because she wanted to stay.

Mos has told CNN he believes authorities have enough evidence to prove Holloway is dead, even if her body is never found. He has suggested her death was an accident.

The new evidence against the three men was gathered from advanced techniques used to re-examine existing information, including cell phone records and text messages exchanged the night Holloway disappeared, Mos has said.

Investigators also returned to the homes of the suspects to try to re-create transmissions. The team also discovered that some existing evidence was improperly analyzed.

Defense attorneys for the Kalpoes and van der Sloot have said the prosecutors' evidence is flimsy. "To say it's less than nothing is too much," van der Sloot's lawyer, Ariean de Bie, told CNN.

In Aruba, authorities can make an arrest if they have reasonable suspicion that someone knows about or is involved in a crime. Magistrates investigate cases, and judges determine a suspect's guilt or innocence. There are no jury trials.
That's the best written explanation that I have seen yet! This confirms what Tyler, Klaas, and I were trying to convey yesterday afternoon.  Don't panic people -- we are still on track!!  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Peaches on December 01, 2007, 09:30:04 AM
Good morning.

FOX is going to do something on this case in a moment....after the commercials..

I thought somebody posted a picture of Dop Kruimel the other day.   :roll:  Maybe not.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: blah on December 01, 2007, 09:32:26 AM
Good Morning Monkeys!

Blah - Love your posts, but your moniker is NOT GOOD for hang-over recovery!  Whew...looking at all your posts this a.m. is intensifying my post-vodka tonic state of being this morning!   :wink:

Good news re: no goods for Joran except the Bible.

Will be interesting to hear what comes out of today's meeting with the prosecutor.  I think he's serious...just not sure what obstacles he's up against.  And of course, we CERTAINLY don't understand their system.  If he is playing a game of cat-and-mouse with the evidence, we have NO IDEA whether that's going on or how it's aiding or hampering the whole process.  Kierkegaard's leap of faith may be in order here re: believing in Mos.

 :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
I know what you mean.  I have been trying to ignore it myself this morning. :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 01, 2007, 09:35:10 AM
I am so whipped by this latest news that for one moment I am almost out of words...nothing left in my arsenal of wit to say this time.  Now, can we go back to talking about Lorenzo?  I am deeming every single person on that piece of crap island as having the ability to aid and abet this trio. I think everyone should be under suspicion for a change...time for each person to systematically prove they are involved in this cover up.  Yes, the corruption island hops and even flies into the Hague.  Don't hold anyone accountable for the disappearance of Natalee Holloway and the entire island is responsible, as far as I am concerned.  Aruba....Dutch...ALE...KLPD...everyone...you are now linked FOREVER with this crime...FOREVER!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: igsigs on December 01, 2007, 09:36:35 AM
Thanks Peaches - earlier FOX reports have done a very poor job explaining the current situation. Hopefully they figure it out.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 01, 2007, 09:37:40 AM
I am so whipped by this latest news that for one moment I am almost out of words...nothing left in my arsenal of wit to say this time.  Now, can we go back to talking about Lorenzo?  I am deeming every single person on that piece of crap island as having the ability to aid and abet this trio. I think everyone should be under suspicion for a change...time for each person to systematically prove they are involved in this cover up.  Yes, the corruption island hops and even flies into the Hague.  Don't hold anyone accountable for the disappearance of Natalee Holloway and the entire island is responsible, as far as I am concerned.  Aruba....Dutch...ALE...KLPD...everyone...you are now linked FOREVER with this crime...FOREVER!!

Don't lose faith yet lala's...it's not over. Let's wait to see what they do with Joran.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: blah on December 01, 2007, 09:37:46 AM
That's the best written explanation that I have seen yet! This confirms what Tyler, Klaas, and I were trying to convey yesterday afternoon.  Don't panic people -- we are still on track!!  :wink:

i'm with ya !
 :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Noly on December 01, 2007, 09:38:19 AM
Hans press conference

http://edition.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/americas/11/30/aruba.holloway/index.html#cnnSTCVideo


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 01, 2007, 09:42:02 AM
I am so whipped by this latest news that for one moment I am almost out of words...nothing left in my arsenal of wit to say this time.  Now, can we go back to talking about Lorenzo?  I am deeming every single person on that piece of crap island as having the ability to aid and abet this trio. I think everyone should be under suspicion for a change...time for each person to systematically prove they are involved in this cover up.  Yes, the corruption island hops and even flies into the Hague.  Don't hold anyone accountable for the disappearance of Natalee Holloway and the entire island is responsible, as far as I am concerned.  Aruba....Dutch...ALE...KLPD...everyone...you are now linked FOREVER with this crime...FOREVER!!

Don't lose faith yet lala's...it's not over. Let's wait to see what they do with Joran.

It ain't over until the fat lady sings...and anita has been very quiet...no singing yet!
I did not say that!! Sorry....evil streak came out!!! lol


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: blah on December 01, 2007, 09:46:26 AM
Hans press conference

http://edition.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/americas/11/30/aruba.holloway/index.html#cnnSTCVideo

thanks for posting this.  The part where he is talking about the ruling on whether or not the K's can use the same lawyer or not is kind of confusing.  It sounds like that ruling might have gone in the Kalpo's favor, not sure it is not real clear.  I guess we will find out soon enough.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: blah on December 01, 2007, 09:47:47 AM
I am so whipped by this latest news that for one moment I am almost out of words...nothing left in my arsenal of wit to say this time.  Now, can we go back to talking about Lorenzo?  I am deeming every single person on that piece of crap island as having the ability to aid and abet this trio. I think everyone should be under suspicion for a change...time for each person to systematically prove they are involved in this cover up.  Yes, the corruption island hops and even flies into the Hague.  Don't hold anyone accountable for the disappearance of Natalee Holloway and the entire island is responsible, as far as I am concerned.  Aruba....Dutch...ALE...KLPD...everyone...you are now linked FOREVER with this crime...FOREVER!!

Don't lose faith yet lala's...it's not over. Let's wait to see what they do with Joran.

It ain't over until the fat lady sings...and anita has been very quiet...no singing yet!
I did not say that!! Sorry....evil streak came out!!! lol


 :smt043


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 01, 2007, 09:49:32 AM
This may already have been posted; apologies if so.

http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/americas/11/30/aruba.holloway/index.html (http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/americas/11/30/aruba.holloway/index.html)

Brothers to be freed in Natalee Holloway case
     
ORANJESTAD, Aruba (CNN) -- Two of the suspects being held in connection with Natalee Holloway's presumed death will be released from custody by Saturday.

Prosecutors wanted Deepak and Satish Kalpoe held in Aruba for another eight days, but a judge rejected their request Friday.

The decision was "a bit of a setback," said Hans Mos, Aruba's chief public prosecutor. But it does not change his plan to decide by the end of the year whether to prosecute anyone in the Holloway case.

"We had hoped for a longer period to confront these suspects with the material we have against them, but this is the way the law says it must go," Mos said. 

Holloway's parents are expected to meet with Mos on Saturday. The prosecutor said he will explain to them what happened, "if I can explain it. I hope I can."

Deepak Kalpoe's defense attorney, meanwhile, said his client is "really happy to recover his freedom after 10 days in jail."

Prosecutors have three days to appeal the decision and will decide Monday whether or not to do so.

A third man, Joran van der Sloot, is still being held in the case. Van der Sloot is set to appear before a judge December 7, and prosecutors have said they are considering requesting that he be detained another 60 days.

The Kalpoe brothers were previously jailed in the case, but were rearrested last week and charged with being involved in the "voluntary manslaughter" of Holloway.

The judge reasoned Friday that "the new evidence, together with the existing evidence in this case, produce serious grounds for the suspicion of some kind of aiding and abetting, of covering up the traces of a crime committed or of the disposing of a corpse," prosecutors said.

But people accused of those crimes do not qualify for pretrial detention under Aruban law, Mos told reporters. He noted that on Monday, the same judge approved van der Sloot's continuing detention based on the same evidence.

"Apparently, the judge sees a difference between the third suspect and these two suspects," Mos said, since the judge concluded the evidence against the Kalpoes was not strong enough to warrant their continued detention.

When the arrests took place November 21, prosecutors said they had new incriminating evidence against the three men.

They were the last people seen with Holloway, 18, as she left an Oranjestad nightclub on May 30, 2005. She was on a trip to Aruba with about 100 classmates celebrating their graduation from Mountain Brook High School in suburban Birmingham, Alabama. 

The three have maintained their innocence in her disappearance.

The Kalpoes have told police they dropped Holloway and van der Sloot off near a lighthouse on the northern tip of the island after they left the nightclub. Van der Sloot's mother, Anita, has said her son told her he was on the beach with Holloway but left her there because she wanted to stay.

Mos has told CNN he believes authorities have enough evidence to prove Holloway is dead, even if her body is never found. He has suggested her death was an accident.

The new evidence against the three men was gathered from advanced techniques used to re-examine existing information, including cell phone records and text messages exchanged the night Holloway disappeared, Mos has said.

Investigators also returned to the homes of the suspects to try to re-create transmissions. The team also discovered that some existing evidence was improperly analyzed.

Defense attorneys for the Kalpoes and van der Sloot have said the prosecutors' evidence is flimsy. "To say it's less than nothing is too much," van der Sloot's lawyer, Ariean de Bie, told CNN.

In Aruba, authorities can make an arrest if they have reasonable suspicion that someone knows about or is involved in a crime. Magistrates investigate cases, and judges determine a suspect's guilt or innocence. There are no jury trials.


mcmarple ... thank youfor all your research ... it is greatly appreciated.

I have been searching for this particular article.

It would be great if there is a translation somewhere of Art Wood's letter.

Thanks again.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: igsigs on December 01, 2007, 09:50:28 AM
Maybe - JR DutchAttorney - is the mole who snagged the Joran *confession*?   :cool:


-------->  FOB/MF Still Down  <--------


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 01, 2007, 09:52:42 AM
Hans press conference

http://edition.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/americas/11/30/aruba.holloway/index.html#cnnSTCVideo

Thank you Noly.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Pita on December 01, 2007, 09:55:16 AM
Is it also true that JQK is on the island?

If true, this makes me feel good.  No ones pulling any bullshit past John.

It was posted last night that he was.

Judges Jossy said there are 2 judges, one for Joran and one for the Kalpoes but still no names. It was posted last week, from Pearl at BFN, that Judge Smid is one of them. There is a photo of the judge leaving the courthouse yesterday, but as we haven’t a photo of Judge Smid, we still don’t know which case he is hearing. Would feel much better if I knew that one of the other judges and not Judge Smid was hearing Joran’s case. I don’t understand why they are being so secretive about the judges.

Pita..Thanks for bringing Ramm's posts over.





I thought it was said these were two new judges that no one knew, that were chosen because they were supposed to be impartial?!


Anna posted per pearl@BFN that one was Smid. I am not a member so didn't see it myself. Maybe Pita can help!


Judge Smit's name was mentioned in an Amigoe article, according to Pearl.   Couldn't locate her post. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 01, 2007, 10:00:39 AM
Msmarple - were you looking for the full Art Wood letter in Diario?

Jossy, E ultimo noticia ta conmove mi curazon y ta recorda mi con duro a bo, Eduardo y mi persona a traha pa trece e caso aki den husticia.
Mi ta spera tur cos ta bon
 
Apreciado Jossy Mansur,

E re-aresto di Joran Van der Sloot y rumannan Kalpoe ta pone Aruba un biaha mas den spotlight mundial, locual ta pone mas atencion y emocion relaciona cu e desaparicion di Natalee Holloway. Mientras mi ta hala atras y cuidadosamente ta observa e ultimo eventonan tumando lugar, mi mester admiti cu mi ta un poco mas esceptico relaciona cu e intencion di Aruba pa resolve e caso aki.

Por fabor tuma nota cu mi a referi na “intencion” di Aruba' y no su "Abilidad" pa resolve e caso di Natalee Holloway. E pueblo di Aruba merece pa haya sa e berdad den e tragedia aki y no worde mal-informa pa media of su Gobierno. Ta pesey mi ta skirbi esaki. Mi kier pa pueblo di Aruba cuestiona e sinceridad di algun autoridad envolvi y no worde ciega pa miedo di publicidad negativo.

Durante e curso di e investigacion aki, mi a bira amigo personal di bo y bo yiu Eduardo, como tambe Dave Holloway.Mi por declara sin duda ningun cu nos intencion y obhetivonan tabata sali for di nos curazon pa e deseo di encontra Natalee.

Den un bida henter trahando como oficial di polis mi ta haya cu e oficialnan di polis di Aruba cu mi por a conoce ta polisnan capaz, competente y profesional. Aunke, manera bo por corda, consistentemente y repetidamente mi a laga sa mi preocupacion relaciona cu e rol di Dennis Jacobs, un agente den departamento di narcotico, pa su asignacion den e caso como investigador principal, pa e Comisario Van der Straaten. Aruba tin detectivenan cu experiencia den casonan di homicidio y desaparicion di personanan. Di con nan no a haya e oportunidad pa resolve e caso aki. Van der Straaten mes a trece duda den e caso cu su amistad personal cu Paulus Van der Sloot.

Un duda cu nunca a termina cu su retiro, mientras Dave Holloway y mi persona a descubri cu e tabata reuni regularmente cu Jacobs y e Comisario Dompig lunanan durante e investigacion. Esey lo por ta apenas un coincidencia of nan por tin un amistad tambe, pero nos a haya esaki inusual. Mi criticanan di Jacobs a worde bon documenta y mi no ta bay ripiti esaki.

El a worde pasa den mannan di e Prome Minister y Procurador General di Aruba, hunto cu un peticion pa kita Jacobs y Dompig for di e caso. Famianan Holloway y Twitty tambe a tuma parti na e peticion aki.

Na October 2005 Dave Holloway y mi persona a reuni den secreto cu Fiscal Amolyn Flanegin. Nos a haci esaki cu conocimento y permiso di e Procurador General. E meta di e reunion aki tabata pa vocifera nos preocupacion relaciona cu e iregularidadnan cu Dennis Jacobs y Comisario Dompig a mustra durante e curso di e investigacion y nos peticion pa Landsrecherche investiga e dos agentenan aki.

Ami cu Dave a duna Comisario Dompig un pista persuasivo relaciona cu amigo di Joran, Koen Gottenbos y nos tabata sinti cu Gottenbos lo por ta un clave pa resolve e caso. Yiu adolescente di Comisario Dompig a bisa Dave Holloway cu Paulus Van der Sloot aparentemente a fia un boto rond di e lapso di tempo di desaparicion di Natalee. Ami y Dave a haya sa cu e boto tabata di tata di Koen Gottenbos y cu Koen tabata tin miedo di worde aresta. Asina hopi cu e anochi e tabata drumi hunto cu su mayornan riba cama.

Durante e curso di e reunion aki Fiscal Flanegin a bisa nos cu el a resigna for di e caso di Holloway pa motibo di respuesta negativo di (Jacobs y Dompig) pa sigui cu e pistanan relaciona cu Gottenbos. Specificamente cu Koen Gottenbos a suministra Joran cu un alibi ficticio pa e anochi di 31 di Mei, 2005. Flanegin a bisa "sigui e mentiranan y lo bo descubri e berdad."

Dos aña a pasa y nos no tin motibo pa kere cu polis a investiga nos peticion pa bay tras di Koen Gottenbos. Nos a haya sa awo cu evidencianan nobo a sali afo di via yamadanan di telefon y e-mails. Mi por bisabo cu Koen Gottenbos a e-mail Joran tur dia!Mi ta spera y reza cu mi escepticismo ta innecesario y cu husticia lo prevalece.

Dios bendiciona pueblo di Aruba.

Arthur E. Wood

(Arthur E. Wood ta un ex agente special di Servicio Secreto, kende a protehe Presidentenan Ford, Carter, Reagan, Bush y Clinton. El a worde honra como Oficial di Polis di aña, pa e Asociacion Internacional di Investigadornan di Credit Card na 1986 y ta un autor y ta conoci pa promove derechonan di victimanan.)
 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 01, 2007, 10:02:49 AM
Morning Klaas!!
You are up bright and early and on top of things already as usual!!! :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 01, 2007, 10:09:24 AM
Nope.  I refuse this time to think Joran will be any different. K2 drove off with Natalee in the car...now they aren't guilty of anything but hiding or abusing a corpse?   Get real here!  What makes anyone think Joran is any different.  Hell!  He was only in the back seat.  I am not getting my hopes up ever again...the K2 will not pay...Joran will not pay.  I have no faith in their system...it's broken (expletive deleted).  Mos can wish all he wants and think this is going to work this time...but Paulus isn't sweating and Anita isn't worried.

Shango knew. Simian knew.  They tried to tell us that you can't get these guys...they left us hints..they told us things we didn't want to believe.  Now, Lala's knows.  No one is going to pay...no one.  Sorry, I am way too frustrated to be here. Writing my name in my own book and putting me on the "list".  Someone has to encourage me or I am giving up. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Peaches on December 01, 2007, 10:13:41 AM
Lalas, get a hold of yourself!  As much as we would like to see justice in the here and now, there is always a chance we won't.  I am counting on justice in the hereafter for everyone involved.  It will happen. 

As for justice now, all is not lost.  The main suspect is still in jail.  You can't crawl inside Hans' head to know what he's got up his sleeve.  It better be more than his arm or I'm going to be annoyed. 

Patience.  We've hung in there this long. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: oldfart on December 01, 2007, 10:19:04 AM
Hey ... It's not over...   MOS has had a little different look at the playing filed  and rules bieng used.  Will just have to wait and see how he chnages his game plan..

Oh Hi Monkeys.... :smt006
Coffee... black & strong please  :smt087


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Getagrip on December 01, 2007, 10:21:16 AM
You know, trying to figure out what things mean out of Aruba is an exercise in futility. Nothing, NOTHING, they have done from the very beginning has made sense, so I've quit thinking along the lines of 'well, they wouldn't do that unless...'

The only thing that has made sense is Mos coming out and facing the media interest head on, albeit within the confines of their laws (of what he can and cannot say) and that should have been done 2.5 years ago. That's what I was saying from the beginning. Sure, we have to understand their laws, but they had to understand 'our' interest in this case too, and they failed to listen and to adapt - it's a two way street. Instead, they compounded the problem and gave the case the legs that made it the grand fiasco it has become.

I admire all of you who have had the patience to follow this along until its resolution. I couldn't do it (yet, here I am back for more). I personally will only believe that they have something if and when they bring charges, at which point the information they have will become public.

Until then, I will continue to believe that Joran and possibly one or two of the Kalpoes have gotten away with murder, based on what I know, and that their justice system has failed miserably. I couldn't care less about pre-trial detentions, I care about a trial. So, bring it on - or just shut up!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Buckeye on December 01, 2007, 10:22:50 AM
As far as I can tell, Dop Kruimel was or is a spokesperson for prosecutor.  She was or currently is a presenter on some show on SBS6.  There was talk that the media was a big consideration this time so Mos brought Kruimel on board..... my translations could be totally off  :2doh: 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: blah on December 01, 2007, 10:22:58 AM
Nope.  I refuse this time to think Joran will be any different. K2 drove off with Natalee in the car...now they aren't guilty of anything but hiding or abusing a corpse?   Get real here!  What makes anyone think Joran is any different.  Hell!  He was only in the back seat.  I am not getting my hopes up ever again...the K2 will not pay...Joran will not pay.  I have no faith in their system...it's broken (expletive deleted).  Mos can wish all he wants and think this is going to work this time...but Paulus isn't sweating and Anita isn't worried.

Shango knew. Simian knew.  They tried to tell us that you can't get these guys...they left us hints..they told us things we didn't want to believe.  Now, Lala's knows.  No one is going to pay...no one.  Sorry, I am way too frustrated to be here. Writing my name in my own book and putting me on the "list".  Someone has to encourage me or I am giving up. 

Dave and Beth have not given up and they need you.  Natalee is everyones little sister and there is a brave group of heros on their way to Aruba as we speak to bring here up from the cold, dark ocean floor and bring her back to Alabama where she belongs.  Do we all even realize that these men might not even make it home for Christmas?  I dont see them turning their boat around because of some jerk from Curacao. At the very least, we can still stick around to support the men on that ship.

You are free to do as you wish but please, do not base your decisions to give up and some crap written by Simian and Shango - where the hell are they NOW?  Alot has changed since their last posts.  There is a whole new battle going on since the time they posted and I dont see them doing anything to help anymore.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: msmarple on December 01, 2007, 10:28:27 AM
klaas - What I am saying about Art Wood's letter in Diario, is that it was published in Pap, and also, the first two paragraphs were published in Diaro in English. However, the jump to the rest of the English version brings up a blank page.

My security scan is running right now and my computer runs too slow to try check back, but I expect the link will be fixed some time today.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: MuffyBee on December 01, 2007, 10:32:01 AM
Many monkeys are wondering why Deepak and Satish are getting out of jail, even though it is strongly suspicioned that they took part in helping with the cover up and disposal of Natalee's body.  I know many saw that it doesn't seem much time would be served for such things, even if and when they may be convicted.  Was it 3 years?  Sorry, don't have link.  What I am getting at is something that happened here in Texas, where Laura Hall helped Colton Pitonyak  dismember Jennifer Cave, whom Pitonyak had killed, and then drove Pitonyak to Mexico to escape. She got very little punishment - FIVE YEARS and is eligible for parole.  For dismemberment!  Here is the link:

http://www.kvue.com/news/local/stories/112807kvuehall-bkm.46a9d71c.html





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Helen Back on December 01, 2007, 10:34:02 AM
It is true that Joran is already one his second 8 day extension, correct?

That must mean that they have presented more evidence to keep him in jail?

Do we know if the judge the judge that let the K's out it the same judge that approved Jorans seconds 8 day extension?

Do we know any of the judges names this time around?

I recall either Mos or Jossy, I think it was Mos, saying it was the same judge.

this is the 3rd different answer to this question.

I guess what that means is they are trying to keep us confused as to which judge is doing what.

I dont blame them.  If I were a corrupt judge, i'd do the same thing.

ORANJESTAD, Aruba (CNN) -- Two of the suspects being held in connection with Natalee Holloway's presumed death will be released from custody by Saturday.

Prosecutors wanted Deepak and Satish Kalpoe held in Aruba for another eight days, but a judge rejected their request Friday.

The decision was "a bit of a setback," said Hans Mos, Aruba's chief public prosecutor. But it does not change his plan to decide by the end of the year whether to prosecute anyone in the Holloway case.

"We had hoped for a longer period to confront these suspects with the material we have against them, but this is the way the law says it must go," Mos said. Watch the prosecutor's reaction »

Holloway's parents are expected to meet with Mos on Saturday. The prosecutor said he will explain to them what happened, "if I can explain it. I hope I can."

Deepak Kalpoe's defense attorney, meanwhile, said his client is "really happy to recover his freedom after 10 days in jail."

Prosecutors have three days to appeal the decision and will decide Monday whether or not to do so.

A third man, Joran van der Sloot, is still being held in the case. Van der Sloot is set to appear before a judge December 7, and prosecutors have said they are considering requesting that he be detained another 60 days.

The Kalpoe brothers were previously jailed in the case, but were rearrested last week and charged with being involved in the "voluntary manslaughter" of Holloway.

The judge reasoned Friday that "the new evidence, together with the existing evidence in this case, produce serious grounds for the suspicion of some kind of aiding and abetting, of covering up the traces of a crime committed or of the disposing of a corpse," prosecutors said.

But people accused of those crimes do not qualify for pretrial detention under Aruban law, Mos told reporters. He noted that on Monday, the same judge approved van der Sloot's continuing detention based on the same evidence.  

"Apparently, the judge sees a difference between the third suspect and these two suspects," Mos said, since the judge concluded the evidence against the Kalpoes was not strong enough to warrant their continued detention.

When the arrests took place November 21, prosecutors said they had new incriminating evidence against the three men.

They were the last people seen with Holloway, 18, as she left an Oranjestad nightclub on May 30, 2005. She was on a trip to Aruba with about 100 classmates celebrating their graduation from Mountain Brook High School in suburban Birmingham, Alabama. See a timeline of the case »

have maintained their innocence in her disappearance.

The Kalpoes have told police they dropped Holloway and van der Sloot off near a lighthouse on the northern tip of the island after they left the nightclub. Van der Sloot's mother, Anita, has said her son told her he was on the beach with Holloway but left her there because she wanted to stay.

Mos has told CNN he believes authorities have enough evidence to prove Holloway is dead, even if her body is never found. He has suggested her death was an accident.

The new evidence against the three men was gathered from advanced techniques used to re-examine existing information, including cell phone records and text messages exchanged the night Holloway disappeared, Mos has said.

Investigators also returned to the homes of the suspects to try to re-create transmissions. The team also discovered that some existing evidence was improperly analyzed.

Defense attorneys for the Kalpoes and van der Sloot have said the prosecutors' evidence is flimsy. "To say it's less than nothing is too much," van der Sloot's lawyer, Ariean de Bie, told CNN.

In Aruba, authorities can make an arrest if they have reasonable suspicion that someone knows about or is involved in a crime. Magistrates investigate cases, and judges determine a suspect's guilt or innocence. There are no jury trials.

Good morning all, and thanks for the article from CNN.  Very good explanation except for one thing.  Mos, in his first interview, very specifically said they don't believe Natalee's death was the result of an accident.   Voluntary manslaughter.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Buckeye on December 01, 2007, 10:34:10 AM
The one thing that I am going on is that this is pretty big Dutch news. 

Most comments at Dutch sites are similar to ours.  There are more comments about the corruption on the islands (and some think they should not get involved).

Most think Dutch punishment is very lenient, in general. 

I just think, the more eyes, with sentiment for Natalee and her family, the more accountable they need to be. 

I envision Dutch editorials related to the outcome: corruption in police or judiciary etc.  They seem to want Peter DeVries to finish the case....he seems to be the one that uncovers the "corruption".


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: MuffyBee on December 01, 2007, 10:35:29 AM
What I was getting at in my previous post was, there doesn't seem to be much punishment for abusing a corpse and covering up a murder and helping a murderer escape, even here in Texas.  Thinking and comparing this to Deepak and Satish's involvement in Natalee's case.  If Mos is only going to go after them for hiding Natalee and covering up...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: MuffyBee on December 01, 2007, 10:37:28 AM
I personally think in either case the punishment is way to lenient!  Helping cover up a murder, helping a murderer to escape and then covering up... :smt093


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: NYC_lover on December 01, 2007, 10:37:57 AM
There was an article in todays paper and in one paragraph it said the following:

"It says Prosecutor Dop Kruimel said she hasn't decided whether to appeal the decision to release the men." 

Who is Dos Kruimel I never heard of her before and is she the one actually going to court and presenting the case to the judge.  I would think a case this big you would have your so called bigs guns handling it.

San  Sorry to say that NYC_lover posted the other day and compared this bod to KJ!!!!

MumInOhio - Do I have post something wrong?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: robots on December 01, 2007, 10:38:18 AM
im just catching up

but it can tell you one thing
i have not even considered giving up

i never give up - EVER

back later

fight fight fight and fight some more 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 01, 2007, 10:38:30 AM
I am just saying what a lot are thinking.  :roll: :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: oldfart on December 01, 2007, 10:38:31 AM
<<  snip >>
Shango knew. Simian knew.  They tried to tell us that you can't get these guys...they left us hints..they told us things we didn't want to believe.  Now, Lala's knows.  No one is going to pay...no one.  Sorry, I am way too frustrated to be here. Writing my name in my own book and putting me on the "list".  Someone has to encourage me or I am giving up. 
:smt075  LaLa's  :smt014
Are we going to have to ask  that some one removes your book from you for a bit... so you can concentrate on the positive stuff for a bit longer.  Who knows... maybe Simian has enough faith in MOS  to have a little talk with him


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: NYC_lover on December 01, 2007, 10:39:34 AM
Dop is a she?  :idea:

I don't know if she is just a spokesperson or not. Mos referred to the lead prosecutor as a she...but i was thinking he was talking about Lugo.

Igsigs - Dop Kruimel is a she.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: robots on December 01, 2007, 10:39:56 AM
in the USA if someone kills someone and then they call their relative to help move the body, i wonder what the punishment is

as much as i think it should be a lot, it probably isnt as much as it should be


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Getagrip on December 01, 2007, 10:41:35 AM
Going through today's Diario:

12.01.2007

Request to prolong the detention of the Kalpoe brothers has been denied
http://getagripmonkey.blogspot.com/2007/12/request-to-prolong-detention-of-kalpoe.html
DIARIO Aruba

12/01/2007

ORANJESTAD(AAN)—Yesterday, the judge-commissioner denied the request to prolong the detention of the Kalpoe brothers.

They are suspected, along with the third suspect Joran v.d. Sloot, in the death of Natalee Holloway, or in any case, of mistreatment which brought about her death. The Public Ministry requested their detention prolonged.

The Judge-commissioner decided that the current criminal file against the suspects, in which new proof had been added recently, has enough substance to have serious objections against them, but only for actions that according to the law does not allow for preventive detention, namely destruction of clues of a crime and or disposal of a body.

The penalty that can be imposed for such crimes is not sufficient to be able to use preventive detention.

The decision of the judge-commissioner can be appealed within 3 days. During the coming days, the Public Ministry will consider this possibility.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: robots on December 01, 2007, 10:41:44 AM
if hans mos doesnt do the right thing


he will take this to his ()_*)^^&^&%^&%(#^^&*  grave




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: blah on December 01, 2007, 10:46:25 AM
I am just saying what a lot are thinking.  :roll: :roll:

We have all been around for two and a half years.  We have been through so many ups and downs we cant even remember them all.

We are now in the last 4 weeks.  This thing ends in 4 weeks one way or the other.  Mos has told us this.

It would be a damn shame to make it through all the other SHIT they have flung at us for over 2 years just to crap out on the last major push for justice.  Its now or never, we have to get through this last attempt for justice and the corrupt sonsofbitches are gonna be doing everything they can to stop us.  If we all give up, they will win.  Those men on that boat are bringing her home.  We will at least have that.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 01, 2007, 10:46:43 AM
if hans mos doesnt do the right thing


he will take this to his ()_*)^^&^&%^&%(#^^&*  grave




See even Robots agrees...FOREVER!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: blah on December 01, 2007, 10:47:52 AM
<<  snip >>
Shango knew. Simian knew.  They tried to tell us that you can't get these guys...they left us hints..they told us things we didn't want to believe.  Now, Lala's knows.  No one is going to pay...no one.  Sorry, I am way too frustrated to be here. Writing my name in my own book and putting me on the "list".  Someone has to encourage me or I am giving up. 
:smt075  LaLa's  :smt014
Are we going to have to ask  that some one removes your book from you for a bit... so you can concentrate on the positive stuff for a bit longer.  Who knows... maybe Simian has enough faith in MOS  to have a little talk with him


holy shit oldfart pulled out a switch!!!!!!!!!!

 :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 01, 2007, 10:48:08 AM
What I was getting at in my previous post was, there doesn't seem to be much punishment for abusing a corpse and covering up a murder and helping a murderer escape, even here in Texas.  Thinking and comparing this to Deepak and Satish's involvement in Natalee's case.  If Mos is only going to go after them for hiding Natalee and covering up...

Exactly Muffy, they think of assisting in disposing of a corpse as a small crime.  Rape is probably even a lesser crime.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 01, 2007, 10:49:22 AM
Thanks Getagrip!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: NYC_lover on December 01, 2007, 10:51:17 AM
Dop is a she?  :idea:

I don't know if she is just a spokesperson or not. Mos referred to the lead prosecutor as a she...but i was thinking he was talking about Lugo.

An early Dutch report referred to her as a Press Officer in office of OM.   :roll:

She has a job by the OM in Amsterdam. I can check out what kind of cases by were for her. (What kind of cases she treated). And yes, she was a Press Officer by SBS6 also. She was come on crime TV programms asking for help, for hoping witness/tip-persons want call her and she was hoping on right tip, for a make a solved case in the Netherlands. Unfortunately no tips about assassination cases.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 01, 2007, 10:51:34 AM
Okay, I will shut up.  I am still hanging in there...but gosh, darn it!  This is hard to do.  :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: MumInOhio on December 01, 2007, 10:53:23 AM
There was an article in todays paper and in one paragraph it said the following:

"It says Prosecutor Dop Kruimel said she hasn't decided whether to appeal the decision to release the men." 

Who is Dos Kruimel I never heard of her before and is she the one actually going to court and presenting the case to the judge.  I would think a case this big you would have your so called bigs guns handling it.

San  Sorry to say that NYC_lover posted the other day and compared this bod to KJ!!!!

MumInOhio - Do I have post something wrong?


No..  could you please post what you did the other day about Dop Kruimel.
Thanks in advance.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: blah on December 01, 2007, 10:54:10 AM
Okay, I will shut up.  I am still hanging in there...but gosh, darn it!  This is hard to do.  :roll:

it was that beating from oldfart wasnt it???

 :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: robots on December 01, 2007, 10:54:28 AM
call me crazy
but i still have faith in MOS  :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: NYC_lover on December 01, 2007, 10:57:06 AM
There was an article in todays paper and in one paragraph it said the following:

"It says Prosecutor Dop Kruimel said she hasn't decided whether to appeal the decision to release the men." 

Who is Dos Kruimel I never heard of her before and is she the one actually going to court and presenting the case to the judge.  I would think a case this big you would have your so called bigs guns handling it.

San  Sorry to say that NYC_lover posted the other day and compared this bod to KJ!!!!

MumInOhio - Do I have post something wrong?


No..  could you please post what you did the other day about Dop Kruimel.
Thanks in advance.

Sure, was it about herself or about the Dutch/Aruba law?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 01, 2007, 10:58:51 AM
Okay, I will shut up.  I am still hanging in there...but gosh, darn it!  This is hard to do.  :roll:

it was that beating from oldfart wasnt it???

 :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

I was afraid the whip would be next!  :shock: :shock:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: MumInOhio on December 01, 2007, 11:00:46 AM
There was an article in todays paper and in one paragraph it said the following:

"It says Prosecutor Dop Kruimel said she hasn't decided whether to appeal the decision to release the men." 

Who is Dos Kruimel I never heard of her before and is she the one actually going to court and presenting the case to the judge.  I would think a case this big you would have your so called bigs guns handling it.

San  Sorry to say that NYC_lover posted the other day and compared this bod to KJ!!!!

MumInOhio - Do I have post something wrong?


No..  could you please post what you did the other day about Dop Kruimel.
Thanks in advance.

Sure, was it about herself or about the Dutch/Aruba law?


Herself...I think there was a pic..  Thanks


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: oldfart on December 01, 2007, 11:08:43 AM
Okay, I will shut up.  I am still hanging in there...but gosh, darn it!  This is hard to do.  :roll:
Lala's its going to get harder.
Unless MOS is planning charging a lot of people with  "conspiracy in the destruction of clues of a crime and or disposal of a body"

Oh chit... O/T my play list just played http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bpQE9E3M98I
If it happens to come up when I'm in Natalee's thread I tend to get  :smt022

Sorry for being O/T
BBL


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: NYC_lover on December 01, 2007, 11:11:31 AM
Herself...I think there was a pic..  Thanks

Ok, here it's!

This is the second Karin Janssen!! SBS TV babe.... Dom Kruimel Public prosecutor in Amsterdam

This is Dop Kruimel!
(http://i213.photobucket.com/albums/cc231/Crimesearcher/dopkruimel.jpg)
Dop Kruimel presenteert samen met Leo de Later het programma "Meldkamer", op SBS6. Meer informatie hierover staat op www.sbsmeldkamer.nl

Dop Kruimel is officier van justitie van het arrondissement Amsterdam.
http://www.tvbabes.com/presentatrices/dop.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Getagrip on December 01, 2007, 11:11:42 AM
Common Court rejects appeal of D.K.’s Lawyer in the Holloway case
Maintains majority of restrictions against J.v.d.S.
http://getagripmonkey.blogspot.com/2007/12/common-court-rejects-appeal-of-d.html

DIARIO Aruba

12/01/2007

ORANJESTAD(AAN)—Yesterday, the Common Court of Justice decided upon two separate appeals that were handed down for the lawyers of suspects D.K. and J.v.d.S. in the Holloway case. D.K. and J.v.d.S. are suspected, along with the third suspect S.K., in the death of Natalee Holloway, or in any case, mistreatment which led to her death.

Yesterday, these appeals were dealt with behind closed doors. In the case against D.K., the judge-commissioner gave an order, upon the request of the Public Ministry, to deny the lawyers of Kock, Wix and Zeppenveldt access to the suspect D.K. for a duration of eight days. Until now, the lawyers of Kock, Wix and Zeppenveldt have represented the K. brothers as a team.

The Public Ministry asked for this order based on the suspicion that D.K. could be obtaining information related to the investigation that they have against him or that the investigation to get to the truth could be impeded.

This suspicion was based on information from police reports that support the theory that some time ago, D.K. spoke to his brother S.K. in relation to their standing in the investigation. On this basis, the Public Ministry observed that the suspects were adjusting their declarations to fit each others’. This, along with the fact that both suspects were represented by the same team of lawyers, made the Public Ministry request the order.

The judge-commissioner went along with the Public Ministry’s [legal] arguments and gave the order that the three lawyers may not visit their client D.K. The lawyers appealed this decision at the Common Court. Currently, they only represent S.K. Upon the request of the aforementioned lawyers, D.K. is being represented by another lawyer since last week.

The Common Court decided today that the order of the judge-commissioner has its place and rejected the lawyer’s appeal. In the meantime, the judge-commissioner extended the term mentioned by 8 more days. In the case against J.v.d.S. it was asked of the Common Court to alleviate the restrictions against him (no contact with people other than his lawyer, no telephone, no letters, no newspapers, no magazines and no television).

They specifically asked for visits (his mother and brother, another lawyer and friends), a bible and other reading materials, and exercise. In the meantime, KIA, upon the request of the Public Ministry, provided a bible and reading material. The Common Court rejected the appeal against the restrictions yesterday, in the interests of the investigation.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: MumInOhio on December 01, 2007, 11:14:11 AM
NYC_lover BBL...Is she a prosecutor or press person or both? When I search google I see both!!!! I think you said she is like Karen Janssen!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Puzzler on December 01, 2007, 11:15:07 AM
Is it also true that JQK is on the island?

If true, this makes me feel good.  No ones pulling any bullshit past John.

It was posted last night that he was.

Judges Jossy said there are 2 judges, one for Joran and one for the Kalpoes but still no names. It was posted last week, from Pearl at BFN, that Judge Smid is one of them. There is a photo of the judge leaving the courthouse yesterday, but as we haven’t a photo of Judge Smid, we still don’t know which case he is hearing. Would feel much better if I knew that one of the other judges and not Judge Smid was hearing Joran’s case. I don’t understand why they are being so secretive about the judges.

Pita..Thanks for bringing Ramm's posts over.





I thought it was said these were two new judges that no one knew, that were chosen because they were supposed to be impartial?!


I'm reading all this about two judges (which makes sense to me; three would have made better sense); however, would someone please listen to this copy of Mos press conference yesterday, toward the end, I believe he says the same judge.  I've listened to this three times now and it seems to me like he's saying "same judge" two different time.  It's is response to a question a female reporter asks him (you can hear her question real good).
I would appreciate another monkey(s) telling me what they hear (so I don't continue to feel like I'm going crazy)  :P 


I think I hear Mos say that he sees the same judge in the same position with the other suspect and same evidence the judge kept the suspect over for 8 more days; Mos thought the judge would keep the 2 suspects an additional 8 days, too.  Mos said the judge must see differences between the evidence looking at it for the 1 suspect vs. looking at it for the 2 suspects.

Hmmm....same evidence, same judge, different opinions


Could it be that there was the same judge in Aruba and the second judge is the judge Joran had in Holland?


http://tinyurl.com/2287fj

Here's where I heard it (close to the end).  Maybe you can listen to it and see if you hear the same thing that I "think" I heard.  I listened to it two times, but Mos does have a little difficulty with some expressions (or I have difficulty understanding Mos  .  If you get a chance to listen to it, please let me know what you think.



.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: sandy leiva on December 01, 2007, 11:17:52 AM
The purpose of the arrest was not to force them into a confession and have them turn on one another.

It was to give them a choice to either stick with their old lies or make up new ones before going to trial.

So how is that going to look? If they they have to explain why they were lying up until November 30th 2007? And if they change their stories at the trial, they will be asked why they didn't provide that information during the investigation only a few months earlier.

So nothing has changed except Hans Mos has brought them in to establish their lies from two years ago.

This is a pre-trial situation. And what is important to remember this time around is the post-trial lock up.

1) pre-trial (Mos isn't showing all his cards)

2) establishes lies from 2 years ago

3) goes to trial

4) establishes case against them, which will include lies right up to the trial



I like what you're saying, Islander. Makes sense.

I dont get why yall say pre trial. Aruba has no trials. prosecuter brings the evidence judge decides.  they say there is no trial.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: private eye on December 01, 2007, 11:18:43 AM
Hello good folks. I admit I haven't read all of the pages so I hope I am not being redundant. Maybe I am being over optimistic, but what I hear from the Aruban court may not be bad news. I am hoping this group is informed enough to evaluate my perspective, and that I am brave enough to post my interpretation:)

The court released the 2 brothers NOT because they were innocent and not because of a lack of evidence, but because the crime of which the evidence suggests they are guilty is that of illegally disposing of a body. The reason being that in order to continue the pre arrest the crime that the evidence supports has to be punishable by a sentence of 4 years, and this particular crime is punishable by a maximum sentence of 3 years. Is this correct?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 01, 2007, 11:24:21 AM
There was an article in todays paper and in one paragraph it said the following:

"It says Prosecutor Dop Kruimel said she hasn't decided whether to appeal the decision to release the men." 

Who is Dos Kruimel I never heard of her before and is she the one actually going to court and presenting the case to the judge.  I would think a case this big you would have your so called bigs guns handling it.

San, I have seen that name a couple times over the past few days.  I would think this person is female, is going to put the human face on Natalee for judges.  Sometimes it is hard for us to see that the best prosecutors are not the "prosecutor" himself but his worker-bees.  A perfect example of that here in Alabama is the name of Bill Baxley who prosecuted the bombings of the black churches in Alabama.  At the time I was a neighbor of Bill Baxley.  The person who really did the work and got the perps prosecuted was George Beck, someone who died his work and kept a low profile.  His boss got the credit but all of us who knew anything about the prosecution were ware that George Beck, whose name was mentioned once or twice in the papers, was the "real prosecutor" who put the human face on the children who were killed  in these church bombings and brought justice about after more than a decade, who was able to put these evil people behind bars and 2 of them have died in prison.  That is the kind of prosecution we need here.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: NYC_lover on December 01, 2007, 11:27:45 AM
NYC_lover BBL...Is she a prosecutor or press person or both? When I search google I see both!!!! I think you said she is like Karen Janssen!!!

MumInOhio - She is both. I want to say, she look like Karin Janssen.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Observer on December 01, 2007, 11:28:29 AM
Puzzler:
He Said The same judge in the same position with the same material made a positive decision on Joran 2nd 8 days but not the Kalpoes. Apparently the Judge see's a difference between K2 and Joran.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 01, 2007, 11:28:32 AM
Hello good folks. I admit I haven't read all of the pages so I hope I am not being redundant. Maybe I am being over optimistic, but what I hear from the Aruban court may not be bad news. I am hoping this group is informed enough to evaluate my perspective, and that I am brave enough to post my interpretation:)

The court released the 2 brothers NOT because they were innocent and not because of a lack of evidence, but because the crime of which the evidence suggests they are guilty is that of illegally disposing of a body. The reason being that in order to continue the pre arrest the crime that the evidence supports has to be punishable by a sentence of 4 years, and this particular crime is punishable by a maximum sentence of 3 years. Is this correct?

Not sure about the 4yr sentance part but YES, you are correct.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Puzzler on December 01, 2007, 11:30:17 AM
There was an article in todays paper and in one paragraph it said the following:

"It says Prosecutor Dop Kruimel said she hasn't decided whether to appeal the decision to release the men." 

Who is Dos Kruimel I never heard of her before and is she the one actually going to court and presenting the case to the judge.  I would think a case this big you would have your so called bigs guns handling it.

San, I have seen that name a couple times over the past few days.  I would think this person is female, is going to put the human face on Natalee for judges.  Sometimes it is hard for us to see that the best prosecutors are not the "prosecutor" himself but his worker-bees.  A perfect example of that here in Alabama is the name of Bill Baxley who prosecuted the bombings of the black churches in Alabama.  At the time I was a neighbor of Bill Baxley.  The person who really did the work and got the perps prosecuted was George Beck, someone who died his work and kept a low profile.  His boss got the credit but all of us who knew anything about the prosecution were ware that George Beck, whose name was mentioned once or twice in the papers, was the "real prosecutor" who put the human face on the children who were killed  in these church bombings and brought justice about after more than a decade, who was able to put these evil people behind bars and 2 of them have died in prison.  That is the kind of prosecution we need here.


In Greta's interview with Mos, Mos said he had an assistant and that "she" was doing a good job.  That "she" must be Dop.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 01, 2007, 11:30:22 AM
NYC_lover BBL...Is she a prosecutor or press person or both? When I search google I see both!!!! I think you said she is like Karen Janssen!!!

Hans MOS said he was overseeing the case but that someone else in his office was prosecuting it.  That must be Dop Kruimel.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Slogger on December 01, 2007, 11:30:43 AM
Hello good folks. I admit I haven't read all of the pages so I hope I am not being redundant. Maybe I am being over optimistic, but what I hear from the Aruban court may not be bad news. I am hoping this group is informed enough to evaluate my perspective, and that I am brave enough to post my interpretation:)

The court released the 2 brothers NOT because they were innocent and not because of a lack of evidence, but because the crime of which the evidence suggests they are guilty is that of illegally disposing of a body. The reason being that in order to continue the pre arrest the crime that the evidence supports has to be punishable by a sentence of 4 years, and this particular crime is punishable by a maximum sentence of 3 years. Is this correct?


Whether or not it's correct, that's my interpretation, too.

We don't know the evidence presented for suspicion of "voluntary manslaughter."  It's said to be the same as that presented for Joran.  So, it is mysterious why the Judge would ruled differently for the Kalpoes--if it was the same Judge.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 01, 2007, 11:32:33 AM
O/T

CHRISTMAS ITEMS ARE NOW READY FOR PURCHASE IN CAFEPRESS. SEE MY SIGNATURE LINE FOR THE LINK.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 01, 2007, 11:32:34 AM
Hello good folks. I admit I haven't read all of the pages so I hope I am not being redundant. Maybe I am being over optimistic, but what I hear from the Aruban court may not be bad news. I am hoping this group is informed enough to evaluate my perspective, and that I am brave enough to post my interpretation:)

The court released the 2 brothers NOT because they were innocent and not because of a lack of evidence, but because the crime of which the evidence suggests they are guilty is that of illegally disposing of a body. The reason being that in order to continue the pre arrest the crime that the evidence supports has to be punishable by a sentence of 4 years, and this particular crime is punishable by a maximum sentence of 3 years. Is this correct?

That's what some of us have been screaming! but some not listening. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: private eye on December 01, 2007, 11:32:49 AM
IF MY UNDERSTANDING OF THE COURTS DECISION IS CORRECT, then it is possible and according to Mo's plan that Joran is being held for involuntary manslaughter, etc and that the 2 brothers helped him dispose of the body. This can be corroborated with the transcript of the boys taped conversation in the police vehicle as a plausible scenario. What also makes me feel that this may be on target is that RU still isn't celebrating in the fashion one may expect if the boys were freed per se


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: private eye on December 01, 2007, 11:35:27 AM
AGAIN THIS IS IF MY UNDERSTANDING IS CORRECT,  Joran was held for 16 days vs the boys 8 days concerning the pre arrests


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Slogger on December 01, 2007, 11:35:51 AM
PI, I believe we'd call it..."out on bail, pending trial."  Aruba has no bail.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Buckeye on December 01, 2007, 11:39:19 AM
IF MY UNDERSTANDING OF THE COURTS DECISION IS CORRECT, then it is possible and according to Mo's plan that Joran is being held for involuntary manslaughter, etc and that the 2 brothers helped him dispose of the body. This can be corroborated with the transcript of the boys taped conversation in the police vehicle as a plausible scenario. What also makes me feel that this may be on target is that RU still isn't celebrating in the fashion one may expect if the boys were freed per se

Never saw a charge of involuntary....have only seen voluntary manslaughter....but haven't a clue who is really accused of it.. :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 01, 2007, 11:39:44 AM
IF MY UNDERSTANDING OF THE COURTS DECISION IS CORRECT, then it is possible and according to Mo's plan that Joran is being held for involuntary manslaughter, etc and that the 2 brothers helped him dispose of the body. This can be corroborated with the transcript of the boys taped conversation in the police vehicle as a plausible scenario. What also makes me feel that this may be on target is that RU still isn't celebrating in the fashion one may expect if the boys were freed per se

Yes, I agree.  I do think MOS would have liked to have kept K2 in longer but his goal is to get Joran.

BUT..a correction in your post above.  The charge is VOLUNTARY, not involuntary.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 01, 2007, 11:39:46 AM
Private Eye and Slogger, that is as close as I can correlate it with the way our system works.  Of course, Arleen tried to warn us that we don't understand their system. 

I am optimistic after seeing Greta so down in the mouth about tater head still being held and K2 released, that Taterhead is the big fish and K2 are the "slaves" who cleaned up his dirty work, that all will be punished but Taterhead's more severe.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Puzzler on December 01, 2007, 11:40:23 AM
IF MY UNDERSTANDING OF THE COURTS DECISION IS CORRECT, then it is possible and according to Mo's plan that Joran is being held for involuntary manslaughter, etc and that the 2 brothers helped him dispose of the body. This can be corroborated with the transcript of the boys taped conversation in the police vehicle as a plausible scenario. What also makes me feel that this may be on target is that RU still isn't celebrating in the fashion one may expect if the boys were freed per se

I believe it's "Voluntary Manslaughter"


.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Puzzler on December 01, 2007, 11:42:26 AM
Puzzler:
He Said The same judge in the same position with the same material made a positive decision on Joran 2nd 8 days but not the Kalpoes. Apparently the Judge see's a difference between K2 and Joran.

Thank you.  That's what I thought I heard.

But why do we keep hearing from others "two judges"?

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 01, 2007, 11:44:21 AM
Please give Dana my thanks for having Jossy on last night and my #1 is coming over today to see what the problem with my computer is that I cannot get Dana's program, even with the same program I was getting it before.  Stinking computers...the root of a lot of evil.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Slogger on December 01, 2007, 11:44:51 AM
Private Eye and Slogger, that is as close as I can correlate it with the way our system works.  Of course, Arleen tried to warn us that we don't understand their system. 

I am optimistic after seeing Greta so down in the mouth about tater head still being held and K2 released, that Taterhead is the big fish and K2 are the "slaves" who cleaned up his dirty work, that all will be punished but Taterhead's more severe.


Greta was on O'Reilly.  Bill mentioned the Keystone Cops, and Greta said, "WORSE."   :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 01, 2007, 11:45:06 AM
call me crazy
but i still have faith in MOS  :cool:

Robots ... I have no faith that justice will come out of Aruba.  Hans Mos may be sincere but he is lacking in an indept knowledge of Dutch law as it pertains to what evidence is sufficient to warrant continued detention of a suspect.  The defence lawyers were adament right up Joran and Deepak's release that the prosecutor's evidence was insufficient and ... the defence lawyers were right ... their contentions and the judge's reasoning for his ruling were one.

That being said ... I still have faith that justice for Natalee Holloway will prevail ... ultimately good always triump evil.

Galatians 6:7
Do not be deceived: God cannot be mocked. A man reaps what he sows


Robots ... maybe ... just maybe ... God's instrument to attain that outcome will be none other than ... an investigation by the FBI into the corrupt Aruban investigation.

Have a good day.

Janet

+++++++++++++++

http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/americas/11/30/aruba.holloway/index.html

Hans Mos
CNN
November 30, 2007


The judge reasoned Friday that "the new evidence, together with the existing evidence in this case, produce serious grounds for the suspicion of some kind of aiding and abetting, of covering up the traces of a crime committed or of the disposing of a corpse," prosecutors said.

But people accused of those crimes do not qualify for pretrial detention under Aruban law, Mos told reporters.


Art Wood
'Rita Cosby Live & Direct'
December 1, 2005


ART WOOD, FORMER SECRET SERVICE AGENT: Absolutely. Absolutely. There's a lot that Americans can do through the State Department. I want to remind everybody that Natalee Holloway was a U.S. citizen. Once the Aruban authorities are done investigating this case, the FBI can still conduct an investigation.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Spock on December 01, 2007, 11:45:18 AM
Can someone summarize what we have learned in this current discussion. I'm reviewing 30 pages...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: robots on December 01, 2007, 11:46:28 AM
call me crazy
but i still have faith in MOS  :cool:

Robots ... I have no faith that justice will come out of Aruba.  Hans Mos may be sincere but he is lacking in an indept knowledge of Dutch law as it pertains to what evidence is sufficient to warrant continued detention of a suspect.  The defence lawyers were adament right up Joran and Deepak's release that the prosecutor's evidence was insufficient and ... the defence lawyers were right ... their contentions and the judge's reasoning for his ruling were one.

That being said ... I still have faith that justice for Natalee Holloway will prevail ... ultimately good always triump evil.

Galatians 6:7
Do not be deceived: God cannot be mocked. A man reaps what he sows


Robots ... maybe ... just maybe ... God's instrument to attain that outcome will be none other than ... an investigation by the FBI into the corrupt Aruban investigation.

Have a good day.

Janet

+++++++++++++++

http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/americas/11/30/aruba.holloway/index.html

Hans Mos
CNN
November 30, 2007


The judge reasoned Friday that "the new evidence, together with the existing evidence in this case, produce serious grounds for the suspicion of some kind of aiding and abetting, of covering up the traces of a crime committed or of the disposing of a corpse," prosecutors said.

But people accused of those crimes do not qualify for pretrial detention under Aruban law, Mos told reporters.


Art Wood
'Rita Cosby Live & Direct'
December 1, 2005


ART WOOD, FORMER SECRET SERVICE AGENT: Absolutely. Absolutely. There's a lot that Americans can do through the State Department. I want to remind everybody that Natalee Holloway was a U.S. citizen. Once the Aruban authorities are done investigating this case, the FBI can still conduct an investigation.

i hear ya

:)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: robots on December 01, 2007, 11:48:47 AM
get this TRIAL going MOS


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Spock on December 01, 2007, 11:50:08 AM
This was posted at RU:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/6ly4kyq.jpg)

What this appears to be saying is that the K2's most likely helped dispose of the body after the fact and did not kill Natalee.  That helping dispose of a body is not as bad as killing and their detention is not warrented.

This does not mean they won't be charged with a crime when it goes to trial, only a lesser crime than Joran.



Was this statement written by the Judge or the prosecutor?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 01, 2007, 11:50:33 AM
Posted at Scrux:

FierlJepper

Joined: 09 Jun 2007
Posts: 155
Location: Netherlands
 Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 11:20 pm    Post subject:   

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 

I actually don't think there's a big problem with the release of the K2. They do remain suspects, it's only a legal technicality around prolonging pre-arrests that prevented them from remaining detained. The only thing that changes now is that the K2 can align their stories better if they are re-arrested (but what's new, they had 2.5 years to do this...). And hey, the good news is that the judge had said that that the evidence "produces serious grounds for the suspicion, etc.". This is very promising information for bringing the case to trial.

Based on all the facts know to us tho, I still believe the Kalpoes played a different (more minor) role in the whole crime than Joran. In this context I am a bit worried that Mos said that all three had more or less the same evidence against them (12 (S), 13 (D) and 14(J) pages). Still the judge decided to keep Joran detained, so the 14-13 = 1 page must make the difference.

The thing that bothers me most is that if K2 played a minor role in the cover-up of traces, disposal of the body or whatever there "supporting act" was, they still haven't incriminated Joran.

How about this scenario:

1. 1:40 J&N dropped off by K2
2. 2:00 K2 home
3. 2:26 call - J explains to D that something happened and he needs transport
4. 2:35 D. sends S. to beach in his car to help J.
5. 2:45 S. finds out that N. has died. J. is very coercive and S. follows his orders. They decided to load the body on the backseat and drive to a quiet spot to discuss.
6. 2:55 D & S are seen by gardener
7. 3:00 - body is temporarily buried
8. 3:10 J dropped off near VDS house
9. 3:30 S arrives at Hooiberg and tells story to D.
10. The next day more "permanent" disposal place is established (but now with Satish' or Deepak's cell phone picked up by Venezuala islands cell tower (i.e. boat has been used).

All that time Deepak was unaware of what S & J were doing (J forbid S. to use his cell and call D.). That's why his "I'll wait for you" messages where so neutral. I still believe that the reason why Deepak never replied to the MSN messages from Joran (that he must have seen) is that he found out the truth around 3:30 when Satish arrived home.

The reason why the Kalpoes haven't simply incriminated Joran and told the truth is:
1. they don't know what happened at the beach between J & N so they have no data to incriminate him (fits very well with the K2 car conversation where Deepak says that he is not prepared to "invent what happened on the beach, since he doesn't know").
2. Satish got involved (dragged in by probably a very "fokked up" Joran that night) by helping J (and is now facing max 4 years)
3. Deepak is innocent but needs to protect his brother from going to jail.

This scenario fits the known facts (and the latest rumors) pretty well and the new evidence could be the cell tower info from May 30th (daytime). The K2 simply used their right to remain silent when confronted with the new evidence and were released since being on a boat is no evidence of a crime (unless Equusearch finds the body of course). In this scenario the whole case now relies on a confession from Joran about what happened on the beach that night. Since there is probably no new evidence about the beach events against him (except the one incremental page), it's gonna be very difficult to bring this case to trail... (J knows what happened to N. on the beach, K2 know what happened to her body).
 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2007, 11:50:52 AM
Hello good folks. I admit I haven't read all of the pages so I hope I am not being redundant. Maybe I am being over optimistic, but what I hear from the Aruban court may not be bad news. I am hoping this group is informed enough to evaluate my perspective, and that I am brave enough to post my interpretation:)

The court released the 2 brothers NOT because they were innocent and not because of a lack of evidence, but because the crime of which the evidence suggests they are guilty is that of illegally disposing of a body. The reason being that in order to continue the pre arrest the crime that the evidence supports has to be punishable by a sentence of 4 years, and this particular crime is punishable by a maximum sentence of 3 years. Is this correct?

That's what some of us have been screaming! but some not listening. 


Yes, and I think you are even correct on the four years versus three years.  Any crime that carries a maximum of less that four years does not require pretrial detention.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Buckeye on December 01, 2007, 11:51:25 AM
The official "suspician" is doodslag (almost equivalent to the US voluntary Manslaughter).

Doodslag is not some kind of accident, it is a rather heavy accusation, just below moord (premeditated murder). It means you did something on purpose and knew that action could result in death and someone died, intentionally or not.

from dugo at RU


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: private eye on December 01, 2007, 11:52:26 AM
I think that we are expecting the worse for no reason YET. People generally perform according to expectations, so we should keep our expectations of the Aruban system and Mos high and not give them the out that we already believe the worst. The court has admitted there is significant evidence that the 2 brothers illegally disposed of a corpse, so the court is also saying the boys have knowledge that Natalee is dead and we can assume thus that they have first hand knowledge of how she became a corpse, and Joran is still being held. Also, regardless of what everyone says, three years is a significant time to be incarcerated, and the boys length of time served CAN BE influenced by their cooperation. AND if they go down for illegally disposing of a corpse, you can bet that anyone else who helped will be named as well.

AND, one of the night mares Beth has had to deal with is the fact that Natalee COULD BE ALIVE AND A SEX SLAVE, so this is a significant finding as far as allowing Beth to have some closure if it turns out to be true. Ignorance may be bliss in some instances, but not in this case. Whether Beth and her mother have realized it yet, the conviction alone of the boys illegally disposing of the body will provide them with a sense of peace in the near future, and they still may have the main prize, the answer to what happened to Natalee, and possibly the perv, excuse me perp who did it, Joran. If the brothers go down, they are going to want company. Three years at their age is a lifetime to them.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 01, 2007, 11:52:33 AM
Spock - I'm not positive but I think so.  It was posted at RU and I'm assuming someone emailed or faxed a copy of the actual press release to them.

Not sure if it was direct from the judge or the prosecutor.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: private eye on December 01, 2007, 11:54:14 AM
I stand correected and I appreciate it, I meant VOLUNTARY MANSLAUGHTER


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: robots on December 01, 2007, 11:54:16 AM
Posted at Scrux:

FierlJepper

Joined: 09 Jun 2007
Posts: 155
Location: Netherlands
 Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 11:20 pm    Post subject:   

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 

I actually don't think there's a big problem with the release of the K2. They do remain suspects, it's only a legal technicality around prolonging pre-arrests that prevented them from remaining detained. The only thing that changes now is that the K2 can align their stories better if they are re-arrested (but what's new, they had 2.5 years to do this...). And hey, the good news is that the judge had said that that the evidence "produces serious grounds for the suspicion, etc.". This is very promising information for bringing the case to trial.

Based on all the facts know to us tho, I still believe the Kalpoes played a different (more minor) role in the whole crime than Joran. In this context I am a bit worried that Mos said that all three had more or less the same evidence against them (12 (S), 13 (D) and 14(J) pages). Still the judge decided to keep Joran detained, so the 14-13 = 1 page must make the difference.

The thing that bothers me most is that if K2 played a minor role in the cover-up of traces, disposal of the body or whatever there "supporting act" was, they still haven't incriminated Joran.

How about this scenario:

1. 1:40 J&N dropped off by K2
2. 2:00 K2 home
3. 2:26 call - J explains to D that something happened and he needs transport
4. 2:35 D. sends S. to beach in his car to help J.
5. 2:45 S. finds out that N. has died. J. is very coercive and S. follows his orders. They decided to load the body on the backseat and drive to a quiet spot to discuss.
6. 2:55 D & S are seen by gardener
7. 3:00 - body is temporarily buried
8. 3:10 J dropped off near VDS house
9. 3:30 S arrives at Hooiberg and tells story to D.
10. The next day more "permanent" disposal place is established (but now with Satish' or Deepak's cell phone picked up by Venezuala islands cell tower (i.e. boat has been used).

All that time Deepak was unaware of what S & J were doing (J forbid S. to use his cell and call D.). That's why his "I'll wait for you" messages where so neutral. I still believe that the reason why Deepak never replied to the MSN messages from Joran (that he must have seen) is that he found out the truth around 3:30 when Satish arrived home.

The reason why the Kalpoes haven't simply incriminated Joran and told the truth is:
1. they don't know what happened at the beach between J & N so they have no data to incriminate him (fits very well with the K2 car conversation where Deepak says that he is not prepared to "invent what happened on the beach, since he doesn't know").
2. Satish got involved (dragged in by probably a very "fokked up" Joran that night) by helping J (and is now facing max 4 years)
3. Deepak is innocent but needs to protect his brother from going to jail.

This scenario fits the known facts (and the latest rumors) pretty well and the new evidence could be the cell tower info from May 30th (daytime). The K2 simply used their right to remain silent when confronted with the new evidence and were released since being on a boat is no evidence of a crime (unless Equusearch finds the body of course). In this scenario the whole case now relies on a confession from Joran about what happened on the beach that night. Since there is probably no new evidence about the beach events against him (except the one incremental page), it's gonna be very difficult to bring this case to trail... (J knows what happened to N. on the beach, K2 know what happened to her body).
 


yep


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: blah on December 01, 2007, 11:55:19 AM
get this TRIAL going MOS

ARREST THAT SWEATY BASTARD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: robots on December 01, 2007, 11:56:11 AM
get this TRIAL going MOS

ARREST THAT SWEATY BASTARD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

yep


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2007, 11:58:11 AM
Klaas,
That post from Sucks, er, Scrux sounds very plausible but then factor in the infiltration of the undercover cop in Holland with Joran incriminating himself.

I do believe Mos has sufficient to bring to trial.  And convict.  He is after Joran not so much the Kalpoes.

MO
.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 01, 2007, 11:58:57 AM
get this TRIAL going MOS

ARREST THAT SWEATY BASTARD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub2/Sweatyrunningman-new2-1.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2007, 12:02:41 PM
get this TRIAL going MOS

ARREST THAT SWEATY BASTARD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Blah,
The sweaty bastard is exempt from obstruction of justice or any such charges being a first degree relative of the main suspect.  Same as suspects can lie, first degree relatives are expected that they will assist a family member.  He said he would do anything for his son. 

Unless Paulus actually had a hand in killing Natalee, any part of the cover up he participated in is immune from prosecution.

Arleen explained this to us several times.  And of course, Paulus would know that as well.  If Kalpoes had been first degree relatives of Joran, they too would be off the hook.

Just the way Dutch law works.

We are going to have to accept what we can get from this.  It won't be anything like what we would see in this country for sure.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Helen Back on December 01, 2007, 12:03:25 PM
call me crazy
but i still have faith in MOS  :cool:

Robots ... I have no faith that justice will come out of Aruba.  Hans Mos may be sincere but he is lacking in an indept knowledge of Dutch law as it pertains to what evidence is sufficient to warrant continued detention of a suspect.  The defence lawyers were adament right up Joran and Deepak's release that the prosecutor's evidence was insufficient and ... the defence lawyers were right ... their contentions and the judge's reasoning for his ruling were one.

That being said ... I still have faith that justice for Natalee Holloway will prevail ... ultimately good always triump evil.

Galatians 6:7
Do not be deceived: God cannot be mocked. A man reaps what he sows


Robots ... maybe ... just maybe ... God's instrument to attain that outcome will be none other than ... an investigation by the FBI into the corrupt Aruban investigation.

Have a good day.

Janet

+++++++++++++++

http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/americas/11/30/aruba.holloway/index.html

Hans Mos
CNN
November 30, 2007


The judge reasoned Friday that "the new evidence, together with the existing evidence in this case, produce serious grounds for the suspicion of some kind of aiding and abetting, of covering up the traces of a crime committed or of the disposing of a corpse," prosecutors said.

But people accused of those crimes do not qualify for pretrial detention under Aruban law, Mos told reporters.


Art Wood
'Rita Cosby Live & Direct'
December 1, 2005


ART WOOD, FORMER SECRET SERVICE AGENT: Absolutely. Absolutely. There's a lot that Americans can do through the State Department. I want to remind everybody that Natalee Holloway was a U.S. citizen. Once the Aruban authorities are done investigating this case, the FBI can still conduct an investigation.

Janet,

I must take exception with the statement that Mr. Mos is lacking an in-depth understanding of Dutch law regarding the evidence his office has presented.   I think we should consider that it's a delicate balance between presenting enough to keep them detained, and not revealing much of the evidence they have.  They Kalpoes have been given an opportunity to clarify their depositions from 2 1/2 years ago, and have also had the opportunity to tell the truth about what happened that night.

If they didn't take the opportunity, the hole they have dug gets a little deeper.  We don't know what Mos is holding back, and unlike US law, where all information must be shared with the opposition party, my understanding is that Mos can hold evidence to reveal at the trial without having shared it with the defense. :shock:

I also understand that the judges who make pre-trial rulings are not the same judges who will preside at the trial.

Someone please correct me if this is not the case.

Helen


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: blah on December 01, 2007, 12:04:48 PM
Hello good folks. I admit I haven't read all of the pages so I hope I am not being redundant. Maybe I am being over optimistic, but what I hear from the Aruban court may not be bad news. I am hoping this group is informed enough to evaluate my perspective, and that I am brave enough to post my interpretation:)

The court released the 2 brothers NOT because they were innocent and not because of a lack of evidence, but because the crime of which the evidence suggests they are guilty is that of illegally disposing of a body. The reason being that in order to continue the pre arrest the crime that the evidence supports has to be punishable by a sentence of 4 years, and this particular crime is punishable by a maximum sentence of 3 years. Is this correct?

That's what some of us have been screaming! but some not listening. 


Yes, and I think you are even correct on the four years versus three years.  Any crime that carries a maximum of less that four years does not require pretrial detention.

Is this why the sweaty one is not arrested?  If his part was only to help with the cover-up and disposal of the body - that's not a big enough crime for a pretrial detention or whatever they call it now a days?

What happens if the total of ALL crimes commited total over 4 years?  Doesnt matter - they just go with the maximum for each to determine if they can be held or not?

Paulus i'm guessing at minumum is guilty of:
hiding or desecrating a body
tampering with evidence
contempt of court
obstruction of justice
contributing to the delinquency of a minor
sweating like a pig


if not:
rape
kidnapping
whatever the crime is for drugging someone
murder or manslaughter



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Spock on December 01, 2007, 12:06:07 PM
Chris Lejuez (SP) said the punishment for the disposal of a body and evidence in Aruba is a maximum of 3 years.

So you can get 3 years if you cover up a killing and 15 years if you don't. Sounds like the law if telling you to cover it up.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 01, 2007, 12:06:40 PM
Posted at Scrux:

FierlJepper

Joined: 09 Jun 2007
Posts: 155
Location: Netherlands
 Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 11:20 pm    Post subject:   

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 

I actually don't think there's a big problem with the release of the K2. They do remain suspects, it's only a legal technicality around prolonging pre-arrests that prevented them from remaining detained. The only thing that changes now is that the K2 can align their stories better if they are re-arrested (but what's new, they had 2.5 years to do this...). And hey, the good news is that the judge had said that that the evidence "produces serious grounds for the suspicion, etc.". This is very promising information for bringing the case to trial.

Based on all the facts know to us tho, I still believe the Kalpoes played a different (more minor) role in the whole crime than Joran. In this context I am a bit worried that Mos said that all three had more or less the same evidence against them (12 (S), 13 (D) and 14(J) pages). Still the judge decided to keep Joran detained, so the 14-13 = 1 page must make the difference.

The thing that bothers me most is that if K2 played a minor role in the cover-up of traces, disposal of the body or whatever there "supporting act" was, they still haven't incriminated Joran.

How about this scenario:

1. 1:40 J&N dropped off by K2
2. 2:00 K2 home
3. 2:26 call - J explains to D that something happened and he needs transport
4. 2:35 D. sends S. to beach in his car to help J.
5. 2:45 S. finds out that N. has died. J. is very coercive and S. follows his orders. They decided to load the body on the backseat and drive to a quiet spot to discuss.
6. 2:55 D & S are seen by gardener
7. 3:00 - body is temporarily buried
8. 3:10 J dropped off near VDS house
9. 3:30 S arrives at Hooiberg and tells story to D.
10. The next day more "permanent" disposal place is established (but now with Satish' or Deepak's cell phone picked up by Venezuala islands cell tower (i.e. boat has been used).

All that time Deepak was unaware of what S & J were doing (J forbid S. to use his cell and call D.). That's why his "I'll wait for you" messages where so neutral. I still believe that the reason why Deepak never replied to the MSN messages from Joran (that he must have seen) is that he found out the truth around 3:30 when Satish arrived home.

The reason why the Kalpoes haven't simply incriminated Joran and told the truth is:
1. they don't know what happened at the beach between J & N so they have no data to incriminate him (fits very well with the K2 car conversation where Deepak says that he is not prepared to "invent what happened on the beach, since he doesn't know").
2. Satish got involved (dragged in by probably a very "fokked up" Joran that night) by helping J (and is now facing max 4 years)
3. Deepak is innocent but needs to protect his brother from going to jail.

This scenario fits the known facts (and the latest rumors) pretty well and the new evidence could be the cell tower info from May 30th (daytime). The K2 simply used their right to remain silent when confronted with the new evidence and were released since being on a boat is no evidence of a crime (unless Equusearch finds the body of course). In this scenario the whole case now relies on a confession from Joran about what happened on the beach that night. Since there is probably no new evidence about the beach events against him (except the one incremental page), it's gonna be very difficult to bring this case to trail... (J knows what happened to N. on the beach, K2 know what happened to her body).
 

Where does Paulus fit into FierlJepper's scenerio?  Even Hans Mos concedes in the Greta interview that Paulus played a role.

Janet

++++++++

Hans Mos
On the Record w/ Greta
November 27, 2007


http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,313168,00.html

MOS: That's a good question. Yes, we thought we did because there was new evidence gained after the moment that they were released, which was two years ago. And it's quite a lot of evidence, at least a lot of material, and there's a lot of it is evidence, and the evidence is just material, but they have to be confronted with that because they were never confronted with those findings.

We progress in this investigation quite a lot, and they didn't -- don't even know what we got in the meantime. So we had to confront them with it. They are suspects, each of them, and they are witnesses against the other, possible. So we have to question them.

And what we think is very important, at least the Dutch suspect, instead of the two Surinams, and his father, who was one way or another involved in this case, has said in interviews that they are willing to talk. They are willing to disclose what happened in the past at a time set by them. And we think it is very important that this is the time to disclose this information to the public and to us because their point of view is, their son or this suspect, this Dutch suspect, didn't do anything, but he has information and he doesn't give it. We think that's unthinkable.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2007, 12:07:32 PM
When there has been a trial and a conviction, the FBI has no basis for conducting an investigation.  If Joran is convicted, that's it.

In any event, the FBI can only conduct investigations where invited.  I don't think Aruba will do that.  This is it as far as any justice we are going to see in this investigation. 

My prayers are that Hans Mos will be successful in his endeavors and bring this to a trial with a conviction of these charges of voluntary manslaughter against Joran.  It's not much but better than nothing, IMO only.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: blah on December 01, 2007, 12:09:49 PM
get this TRIAL going MOS

ARREST THAT SWEATY BASTARD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Blah,
The sweaty bastard is exempt from obstruction of justice or any such charges being a first degree relative of the main suspect.  Same as suspects can lie, first degree relatives are expected that they will assist a family member.  He said he would do anything for his son. 

Unless Paulus actually had a hand in killing Natalee, any part of the cover up he participated in is immune from prosecution.

Arleen explained this to us several times.  And of course, Paulus would know that as well.  If Kalpoes had been first degree relatives of Joran, they too would be off the hook.

Just the way Dutch law works.

We are going to have to accept what we can get from this.  It won't be anything like what we would see in this country for sure.

.

Arlene is full of shit.








Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2007, 12:10:16 PM
No matter how much Paulus is involved in cover up, obstruction, etc. he is not prosecutable unless he was a participant in the original crime.

He is immune from prosecution as a first degree relative of the one main suspect.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: NYC_lover on December 01, 2007, 12:11:11 PM
No idea, or u all know.
RTL4 nieuws report: OM Aruba goes in appeal, to the Kalpoes.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: JustMeT on December 01, 2007, 12:11:21 PM
Posted at Scrux:

FierlJepper

Joined: 09 Jun 2007
Posts: 155
Location: Netherlands
 Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 11:20 pm    Post subject:   

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 

I actually don't think there's a big problem with the release of the K2. They do remain suspects, it's only a legal technicality around prolonging pre-arrests that prevented them from remaining detained. The only thing that changes now is that the K2 can align their stories better if they are re-arrested (but what's new, they had 2.5 years to do this...). And hey, the good news is that the judge had said that that the evidence "produces serious grounds for the suspicion, etc.". This is very promising information for bringing the case to trial.

Based on all the facts know to us tho, I still believe the Kalpoes played a different (more minor) role in the whole crime than Joran. In this context I am a bit worried that Mos said that all three had more or less the same evidence against them (12 (S), 13 (D) and 14(J) pages). Still the judge decided to keep Joran detained, so the 14-13 = 1 page must make the difference.

The thing that bothers me most is that if K2 played a minor role in the cover-up of traces, disposal of the body or whatever there "supporting act" was, they still haven't incriminated Joran.

How about this scenario:

1. 1:40 J&N dropped off by K2
2. 2:00 K2 home
3. 2:26 call - J explains to D that something happened and he needs transport
4. 2:35 D. sends S. to beach in his car to help J.
5. 2:45 S. finds out that N. has died. J. is very coercive and S. follows his orders. They decided to load the body on the backseat and drive to a quiet spot to discuss.
6. 2:55 D & S are seen by gardener
7. 3:00 - body is temporarily buried
8. 3:10 J dropped off near VDS house
9. 3:30 S arrives at Hooiberg and tells story to D.
10. The next day more "permanent" disposal place is established (but now with Satish' or Deepak's cell phone picked up by Venezuala islands cell tower (i.e. boat has been used).

All that time Deepak was unaware of what S & J were doing (J forbid S. to use his cell and call D.). That's why his "I'll wait for you" messages where so neutral. I still believe that the reason why Deepak never replied to the MSN messages from Joran (that he must have seen) is that he found out the truth around 3:30 when Satish arrived home.

The reason why the Kalpoes haven't simply incriminated Joran and told the truth is:
1. they don't know what happened at the beach between J & N so they have no data to incriminate him (fits very well with the K2 car conversation where Deepak says that he is not prepared to "invent what happened on the beach, since he doesn't know").
2. Satish got involved (dragged in by probably a very "fokked up" Joran that night) by helping J (and is now facing max 4 years)
3. Deepak is innocent but needs to protect his brother from going to jail.

This scenario fits the known facts (and the latest rumors) pretty well and the new evidence could be the cell tower info from May 30th (daytime). The K2 simply used their right to remain silent when confronted with the new evidence and were released since being on a boat is no evidence of a crime (unless Equusearch finds the body of course). In this scenario the whole case now relies on a confession from Joran about what happened on the beach that night. Since there is probably no new evidence about the beach events against him (except the one incremental page), it's gonna be very difficult to bring this case to trail... (J knows what happened to N. on the beach, K2 know what happened to her body).
 


yep

Yah, I totally agree..some what.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2007, 12:13:14 PM
get this TRIAL going MOS

ARREST THAT SWEATY BASTARD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Blah,
The sweaty bastard is exempt from obstruction of justice or any such charges being a first degree relative of the main suspect.  Same as suspects can lie, first degree relatives are expected that they will assist a family member.  He said he would do anything for his son. 

Unless Paulus actually had a hand in killing Natalee, any part of the cover up he participated in is immune from prosecution.

Arleen explained this to us several times.  And of course, Paulus would know that as well.  If Kalpoes had been first degree relatives of Joran, they too would be off the hook.

Just the way Dutch law works.

We are going to have to accept what we can get from this.  It won't be anything like what we would see in this country for sure.

.

Arlene is full of shit.








She is but nonetheless, we hear Mos say Paulus is involved but we see no arrest.  Why?  Because he is not prosecutable under their law.  That is, if he only assisted in the cover up.  He would have had to participate actively in the original crime to be charged with anything.

Under Dutch law, if you rob a bank and yo mama hides you out in her basement, they are not going to put your momma in jail for doing that.  It is "expected" that family will try to help their budding criminals. 

I don't like it either but it is the reality of the situation with Paulus.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on December 01, 2007, 12:14:21 PM
DANA:  I was livid when JoeT accused Jossy of fabricating evidence.
Is JoeT given any status in Aruba. 

JOSSY:  JoeT can't practice law or activily participate in any court procedings.  He's a loud mouth lawyer. 

Ha!One of my questions answered,thank you Klaas....I'll keep reading.
:)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Observer on December 01, 2007, 12:15:12 PM
This may have been posted already but it's the first time I have seen it. It's just a Dutch Blogger commenting on Joran's BS after his book tour  :shock:

(http://img252.imageshack.us/img252/2494/joransecretsew0.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)
http://ongeletterdeboer.blogspot.com/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: blah on December 01, 2007, 12:15:57 PM
No matter how much Paulus is involved in cover up, obstruction, etc. he is not prosecutable unless he was a participant in the original crime.

He is immune from prosecution as a first degree relative of the one main suspect.



I do not believe this, how can this be?

Are you basing this on just the word of Arlene?

If this is true, there is absoltuley no way i'm going anywhere in the "Dutch Kingdom" again because that is one really screwed up system.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2007, 12:19:53 PM
No matter how much Paulus is involved in cover up, obstruction, etc. he is not prosecutable unless he was a participant in the original crime.

He is immune from prosecution as a first degree relative of the one main suspect.



I do not believe this, how can this be?

Are you basing this on just the word of Arlene?

If this is true, there is absolutely no way i'm going anywhere in the "Dutch Kingdom" again because that is one really screwed up system.


Well, maybe NYC or Ramm will elaborate on this aspect a bit.  It is my understanding and what Arleen said several times. 

Mos cannot re-write the laws to tailor them to this case and they are what they are.

I don't care whether or not you believe me as I am used to being called a liar on this forum but in the end the truth usually proves me right.  And you know it, too, Blah.

So why has Paulus not been arrested in YOUR opinion since you know better?



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 01, 2007, 12:23:42 PM
Chris Lejuez (SP) said the punishment for the disposal of a body and evidence in Aruba is a maximum of 3 years.

So you can get 3 years if you cover up a killing and 15 years if you don't. Sounds like the law if telling you to cover it up.

Spock, I respect you very much and have always followed your posts here and at BFN but recently it seems either I am not understanding your posts or there is something missing. 

Covering up someone else's crime is 4 years (or 3 years as some have stated).  Committing the crime is 15 years.  Would you prefer the one who committed the crime get 3 years and the ones who covered it up get 15 years?   Help me understand what you are saying.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: private eye on December 01, 2007, 12:28:06 PM
Paulus can be charged with illegally disposing of a corpse, regardless of who caused Natalee to become a corpse. He cannot be charged with advising his son or forced to testifying against his son, unless he used his official position to advise his son.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 01, 2007, 12:28:07 PM
call me crazy
but i still have faith in MOS  :cool:

Robots ... I have no faith that justice will come out of Aruba.  Hans Mos may be sincere but he is lacking in an indept knowledge of Dutch law as it pertains to what evidence is sufficient to warrant continued detention of a suspect.  The defence lawyers were adament right up Joran and Deepak's release that the prosecutor's evidence was insufficient and ... the defence lawyers were right ... their contentions and the judge's reasoning for his ruling were one.

That being said ... I still have faith that justice for Natalee Holloway will prevail ... ultimately good always triump evil.

Galatians 6:7
Do not be deceived: God cannot be mocked. A man reaps what he sows


Robots ... maybe ... just maybe ... God's instrument to attain that outcome will be none other than ... an investigation by the FBI into the corrupt Aruban investigation.

Have a good day.

Janet

+++++++++++++++

http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/americas/11/30/aruba.holloway/index.html

Hans Mos
CNN
November 30, 2007


The judge reasoned Friday that "the new evidence, together with the existing evidence in this case, produce serious grounds for the suspicion of some kind of aiding and abetting, of covering up the traces of a crime committed or of the disposing of a corpse," prosecutors said.

But people accused of those crimes do not qualify for pretrial detention under Aruban law, Mos told reporters.


Art Wood
'Rita Cosby Live & Direct'
December 1, 2005


ART WOOD, FORMER SECRET SERVICE AGENT: Absolutely. Absolutely. There's a lot that Americans can do through the State Department. I want to remind everybody that Natalee Holloway was a U.S. citizen. Once the Aruban authorities are done investigating this case, the FBI can still conduct an investigation.

Janet,

I must take exception with the statement that Mr. Mos is lacking an in-depth understanding of Dutch law regarding the evidence his office has presented.   I think we should consider that it's a delicate balance between presenting enough to keep them detained, and not revealing much of the evidence they have.  They Kalpoes have been given an opportunity to clarify their depositions from 2 1/2 years ago, and have also had the opportunity to tell the truth about what happened that night.

If they didn't take the opportunity, the hole they have dug gets a little deeper.  We don't know what Mos is holding back, and unlike US law, where all information must be shared with the opposition party, my understanding is that Mos can hold evidence to reveal at the trial without having shared it with the defense. :shock:

I also understand that the judges who make pre-trial rulings are not the same judges who will preside at the trial.

Someone please correct me if this is not the case.

Helen


In my opinion ... Something is not right.  Both prosecutors in the Natalee Holloway case have been unable to get it right .... unable to determine what sufficient evidence is required to hold the main suspects in detention.  Helen ... the "balance" has been elusive to both Janssen and Mos or ... the judges are manipulating/disregarding Dutch law in their favorable rulings.

Janet

+++++++++


http://sendtofriend.abcnews.go.com/GMA/story?id=3912737

Hans Mos
ABC NEWS
November 26, 2007


Hans Mos, Aruba's chief prosecutor, told ABC News he believes the the new evidence makes the case against the three men stronger than it was two years.

"We are convinced if we had had this evidence we have now they would not have been released by the court at that time," Mos said.


http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,313168,00.html

Hans Mos
On the Record with Greta
November 27, 2007


GRETA VAN SUSTEREN, HOST: Breaking news from Aruba, Joran van der Sloot ordered to stay behind bars for at least eight more days. Now, the Kalpoe brothers already got the same news last week. Now, all three suspects were re-arrested. Why? The prosecutor has now charged all three with voluntary manslaughter of Natalee Holloway.  

MOS: And this decision to re-arrest these three suspects was a decision taken by 10 lawyers, by 10 lawyers sitting around a table (INAUDIBLE) whole afternoon, being presented the new material.  


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: blah on December 01, 2007, 12:28:35 PM
No matter how much Paulus is involved in cover up, obstruction, etc. he is not prosecutable unless he was a participant in the original crime.

He is immune from prosecution as a first degree relative of the one main suspect.



I do not believe this, how can this be?

Are you basing this on just the word of Arlene?

If this is true, there is absolutely no way i'm going anywhere in the "Dutch Kingdom" again because that is one really screwed up system.


Well, maybe NYC or Ramm will elaborate on this aspect a bit.  It is my understanding and what Arleen said several times. 

Mos cannot re-write the laws to tailor them to this case and they are what they are.

I don't care whether or not you believe me as I am used to being called a liar on this forum but in the end the truth usually proves me right.  And you know it, too, Blah.

So why has Paulus not been arrested in YOUR opinion since you know better?



I am not/would not ever call you a liar.

I said I dont believe it because I dont believe the source (arlene).  I dont know NYC, but I also dont question the credibility of this Ramm guy.

I do not know why Paulus has been arrested yet thats why asked if it is due to his crimes dont meet the qualification of 4+ years max penalty or whatever they are telling us this time.


"since you know better?"
dont you start getting an attitude with ME now Dutchie!!!!
 :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: islanders on December 01, 2007, 12:30:09 PM
AGAIN THIS IS IF MY UNDERSTANDING IS CORRECT,  Joran was held for 16 days vs the boys 8 days concerning the pre arrests


I'm not sure about this. I thought an appeal was denied during the fist 8 days.





 



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: robots on December 01, 2007, 12:30:21 PM
No matter how much Paulus is involved in cover up, obstruction, etc. he is not prosecutable unless he was a participant in the original crime.

He is immune from prosecution as a first degree relative of the one main suspect.



I do not believe this, how can this be?

Are you basing this on just the word of Arlene?

If this is true, there is absolutely no way i'm going anywhere in the "Dutch Kingdom" again because that is one really screwed up system.


Well, maybe NYC or Ramm will elaborate on this aspect a bit.  It is my understanding and what Arleen said several times. 

Mos cannot re-write the laws to tailor them to this case and they are what they are.

I don't care whether or not you believe me as I am used to being called a liar on this forum but in the end the truth usually proves me right.  And you know it, too, Blah.

So why has Paulus not been arrested in YOUR opinion since you know better?



I am not/would not ever call you a liar.

I said I dont believe it because I dont believe the source (arlene).  I dont know NYC, but I also dont question the credibility of this Ramm guy.

I do not know why Paulus has been arrested yet thats why asked if it is due to his crimes dont meet the qualification of 4+ years max penalty or whatever they are telling us this time.


"since you know better?"
dont you start getting an attitude with ME now Dutchie!!!!
 :wink:

there, see everything is all better

 :lol: :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Frank on December 01, 2007, 12:30:45 PM
Arlene and Ramm both have no credibility, at all!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: NYC_lover on December 01, 2007, 12:31:28 PM
No matter how much Paulus is involved in cover up, obstruction, etc. he is not prosecutable unless he was a participant in the original crime.

He is immune from prosecution as a first degree relative of the one main suspect.



I do not believe this, how can this be?

Are you basing this on just the word of Arlene?

If this is true, there is absolutely no way i'm going anywhere in the "Dutch Kingdom" again because that is one really screwed up system.


Well, maybe NYC or Ramm will elaborate on this aspect a bit.  It is my understanding and what Arleen said several times. 

Mos cannot re-write the laws to tailor them to this case and they are what they are.

I don't care whether or not you believe me as I am used to being called a liar on this forum but in the end the truth usually proves me right.  And you know it, too, Blah.

So why has Paulus not been arrested in YOUR opinion since you know better?



Anna - about what kind of thing, can I help? About, why Paulus van der Sloot get no an arrested? And about the jail-sentence of 3 -years for J2K?
I have to take a shower, I will brb.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: blah on December 01, 2007, 12:32:15 PM

I am not/would not ever call you a liar.

I said I dont believe it because I dont believe the source (arlene).  I dont know NYC, but I also DO question the credibility of this Ramm guy.

I do not know why Paulus has been arrested yet thats why asked if it is due to his crimes dont meet the qualification of 4+ years max penalty or whatever they are telling us this time.


"since you know better?"
dont you start getting an attitude with ME now Dutchie!!!!
 :wink:

Fixed my typo up there. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: NYC_lover on December 01, 2007, 12:33:45 PM
Arlene and Ramm both have no credibility, at all!

Blah and Frank are u mean, Arlene Schippers? Or however I write her name.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: blah on December 01, 2007, 12:33:50 PM

there, see everything is all better

 :lol: :wink:

thats it, where is that switch oldfart had earlier........



 :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: blah on December 01, 2007, 12:35:04 PM
Arlene and Ramm both have no credibility, at all!

oh I agree, I just typed it wrong up there !!!!!  :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 01, 2007, 12:35:06 PM
This may have been posted already but it's the first time I have seen it. It's just a Dutch Blogger commenting on Joran's BS after his book tour  :shock:

(http://img252.imageshack.us/img252/2494/joransecretsew0.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)
http://ongeletterdeboer.blogspot.com/

 :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 01, 2007, 12:35:09 PM
No matter how much Paulus is involved in cover up, obstruction, etc. he is not prosecutable unless he was a participant in the original crime.

He is immune from prosecution as a first degree relative of the one main suspect.



I do not believe this, how can this be?

Are you basing this on just the word of Arlene?

If this is true, there is absoltuley no way i'm going anywhere in the "Dutch Kingdom" again because that is one really screwed up system.

I believe that the following words of Arlene Ellis-Schipper is the reason that Paulus was not detained last week at the same time as Joran, Deepak and Satish.

Janet

+++++++++++++++


Arlene Ellis-Schipper
'The Abrams Report'
June 30, 2005


ARLENE ELLIS-SCHIPPER, ARUBAN ATTORNEY: Well basically obstruction of justice is a criminal offense in our criminal code. However, there is an exoneration for family members in the first degree. So in the case of Mr. Van der Sloot it would not apply.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: blah on December 01, 2007, 12:36:16 PM
Arlene and Ramm both have no credibility, at all!

Blah and Frank are u mean, Arlene Schippers? Or however I write her name.

YES !


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: NYC_lover on December 01, 2007, 12:36:39 PM

I am not/would not ever call you a liar.

I said I dont believe it because I dont believe the source (arlene).  I dont know NYC, but I also DO question the credibility of this Ramm guy.

I do not know why Paulus has been arrested yet thats why asked if it is due to his crimes dont meet the qualification of 4+ years max penalty or whatever they are telling us this time.


"since you know better?"
dont you start getting an attitude with ME now Dutchie!!!!
 :wink:

Fixed my typo up there. 


What does this mean? About who again is this? dont you start getting an attitude with ME now Dutchie!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Helen Back on December 01, 2007, 12:40:37 PM
Arlene and Ramm both have no credibility, at all!

Agreed.  So I delete from what we have and look at the rest.





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: wreck on December 01, 2007, 12:40:48 PM
No matter how much Paulus is involved in cover up, obstruction, etc. he is not prosecutable unless he was a participant in the original crime.

He is immune from prosecution as a first degree relative of the one main suspect.



I do not believe this, how can this be?

Are you basing this on just the word of Arlene?

If this is true, there is absolutely no way i'm going anywhere in the "Dutch Kingdom" again because that is one really screwed up system.


Well, maybe NYC or Ramm will elaborate on this aspect a bit.  It is my understanding and what Arleen said several times. 

Mos cannot re-write the laws to tailor them to this case and they are what they are.

I don't care whether or not you believe me as I am used to being called a liar on this forum but in the end the truth usually proves me right.  And you know it, too, Blah.

So why has Paulus not been arrested in YOUR opinion since you know better?



Anna - about what kind of thing, can I help? About, why Paulus van der Sloot get no an arrested? And about the jail-sentence of 3 -years for J2K?
I have to take a shower, I will brb.
I always feel I need a shower too when Paulus is mentioned!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2007, 12:41:13 PM
I got your attitude, right here, Blah!

 :cool: :P :cool:

If Paulus actually physically handled a corpse and improperly disposed of it, that might could be a crime but if done in the act of covering for his son, I doubt it would be prosecuted.

Abuse of a corpse is not considered a very serious crime as we have seen from the photos of dragging them about, leaving them lying open and uncovered in the streets like animals, etc.  The Dutch would say they are not superstitious about a corpse the way Americans are in my opinion of how they/we think.

You might need to take an extra blood pressure pill for all this, Blah.  It's gonna get worse before it gets better.

Keep hoping and praying that search is successful as that would clinch a conviction.  We don't even have Joran convicted on manslaughter yet.  He could be released, too, ya know.

I don't like any of this, either.  But it is what it is.  We have to at some point accept the reality that this is not being tried in our court system.  And daily I am thankful for that system we have.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: blah on December 01, 2007, 12:42:11 PM

I am not/would not ever call you a liar.

I said I dont believe it because I dont believe the source (arlene).  I dont know NYC, but I also DO question the credibility of this Ramm guy.

I do not know why Paulus has been arrested yet thats why asked if it is due to his crimes dont meet the qualification of 4+ years max penalty or whatever they are telling us this time.


"since you know better?"
dont you start getting an attitude with ME now Dutchie!!!!
 :wink:

Fixed my typo up there. 


What does this mean? About who again is this? dont you start getting an attitude with ME now Dutchie!!!!

Dutchie = my friend Anna. 

You have nothing to worry about NYC_lover, no one is questioning you or giving you a hard time.  :)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 01, 2007, 12:42:13 PM
No matter how much Paulus is involved in cover up, obstruction, etc. he is not prosecutable unless he was a participant in the original crime.

He is immune from prosecution as a first degree relative of the one main suspect.



I do not believe this, how can this be?

Are you basing this on just the word of Arlene?

If this is true, there is absoltuley no way i'm going anywhere in the "Dutch Kingdom" again because that is one really screwed up system.

Blah, this law is similar to ours whereas a spouse is not asked to testify against the other, but it goes further by allowing any participation in the commission of crime if it was to help cover the crime by said relative to go unpunished, but I am sure there are limits to even that law, and probably there is something that Paulus can be charged with but I think Mos is looking to something bigger, perhaps any participation he may have in racketeering or mob activity.  We know Paulus is involved in something far bigger than this crime against Natalee, be it the most heinous crime, but ... we cannot prove it. 

It's like love, it's hard to describe but we know it when it happens and we know Paulus is involved in something large; otherwise, thus, the Refugee site set up to defend him and his ilk.  It attracts some of the most bizarre and obviously shallow groupies on the internet.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2007, 12:43:16 PM

I am not/would not ever call you a liar.

I said I dont believe it because I dont believe the source (arlene).  I dont know NYC, but I also DO question the credibility of this Ramm guy.

I do not know why Paulus has been arrested yet thats why asked if it is due to his crimes dont meet the qualification of 4+ years max penalty or whatever they are telling us this time.


"since you know better?"
dont you start getting an attitude with ME now Dutchie!!!!
 :wink:

Fixed my typo up there. 


What does this mean? About who again is this? dont you start getting an attitude with ME now Dutchie!!!!

Not you, NYC!  Blah picks on me because I am Dutch-American and he is a mean old man.

I was wondering if you could explain why it is not a crime for a first degree relative to assist one who has committed a crime.  I don't think Paulus will be charged for assisting Joran but some do.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2007, 12:47:24 PM
Exactly, Tyler.

And while Paulus is not the brightest bulb on the tree (Anna using festive, Christmas analogy) he is smart enough to go just so far and no more.  For example, he might help Joran arrange for disposal but not actually handle the corpse to skirt being charged with illegal disposal.

Clever if stupid.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: igsigs on December 01, 2007, 12:48:53 PM
NYC -  RTL4 appeal news?   TIA!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2007, 12:50:41 PM
Have to go work and need to leave before I give BLAH a stroke!

Will BBL for was hoping to learn something of the outcome of Beth's meeting with Mos today.  We need to concentrate on the positives of this and the fact they may be garnering information as to where to search for Natalee and not the things that can't be done under this system!

If they can find Natalee, then that is the greater success than all the prosecutions in the world.  The parents have said at one time or another, just give her back.  That would just mean so much more than socking away these jerks.

Yes, I want Joran convicted for what he did.  We have a long way to go to get to even that but finding Natalee would make it all worthwhile for me.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: blah on December 01, 2007, 12:50:58 PM
Say hello to my little friend

:smt067
:smt068
:smt071
:smt070
:smt066

Theres yer mean old man!!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2007, 12:52:52 PM
Say hello to my little friend

:smt067
:smt068
:smt071
:smt070
:smt066

Theres yer mean old man!!




You MISSED!  I'm still here, haha.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 01, 2007, 12:53:17 PM
There are some things that still haunt me about this case and simplifying it is easy but then those "not so simple" things come back to haunt me. 

Some are the behavior of Joran with his parents.  He seems to be assuring them that he is going to take care of them by patting Anita on the head, as a child would do a small pet or as we recall from days of integration, the way a slave holder would pat his favorite slave on the head as if to say he/she was going to be taken care of.

Then there are the statements of Joran where he always infers he is doing this for his family, he is doing what they would want him to do, he is suffering for them.

Then Deepak's statement of "your own dad, unbelievable."  At that point, Joran seems to bristle and tells him he is doing this for his daddy.  Joran reminds them they are responsible for his daddy going to jail.

Then there is the picture of Paulus at the casino near Natalee.

The biggest question of all, "Why did they drug her?"  Why did they feel it was necessary to drug Natalee if they were going to take her out, Joran was simply going to court her and hopefully have sex with her.  There is something here that still makes me suspicious that Paulus is involved in the arranging, the drugging and raping of Natalee.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Observer on December 01, 2007, 12:54:41 PM
Paulus can be charged with illegally disposing of a corpse, regardless of who caused Natalee to become a corpse. He cannot be charged with advising his son or forced to testifying against his son, unless he used his official position to advise his son.

He already waived his right not to testify vs his Son. I'M not sure what that all means but he should have given up the "Family Privlage" BS where he can lie and obstruct the Investigation as well. I am very happy Mos has mentioned PVDS as being involved but I can't be confident there will be justice until I see PVDS in cuffs again.

(http://img90.imageshack.us/img90/7181/joran8yz1.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: blah on December 01, 2007, 12:54:45 PM
Have to go work and need to leave before I give BLAH a stroke!

Will BBL for was hoping to learn something of the outcome of Beth's meeting with Mos today.  We need to concentrate on the positives of this and the fact they may be garnering information as to where to search for Natalee and not the things that can't be done under this system!

If they can find Natalee, then that is the greater success than all the prosecutions in the world.  The parents have said at one time or another, just give her back.  That would just mean so much more than socking away these jerks.

Yes, I want Joran convicted for what he did.  We have a long way to go to get to even that but finding Natalee would make it all worthwhile for me.

.

dont let the door hit ya.....








take yer little robot buddy with ya......





and come back when you cant stay so long..........



 :smt045


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2007, 12:55:24 PM
Tyler,

What they actually were able to DO and what they intended to do may have been two very different things entirely.

Done it 20 times before and all that needs it's own investigation IMO.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 01, 2007, 12:55:54 PM
SIMPLISTIC COMPARISON

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/usvsarubacopy.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 01, 2007, 12:56:10 PM
There are some things that still haunt me about this case and simplifying it is easy but then those "not so simple" things come back to haunt me. 

Some are the behavior of Joran with his parents.  He seems to be assuring them that he is going to take care of them by patting Anita on the head, as a child would do a small pet or as we recall from days (crap) before integration, the way a slave holder would pat his favorite slave on the head as if to say he/she was going to be taken care of.

Then there are the statements of Joran where he always infers he is doing this for his family, he is doing what they would want him to do, he is suffering for them.

Then Deepak's statement of "your own dad, unbelievable."  At that point, Joran seems to bristle and tells him he is doing this for his daddy.  Joran reminds them they are responsible for his daddy going to jail.

Then there is the picture of Paulus at the casino near Natalee.

The biggest question of all, "Why did they drug her?"  Why did they feel it was necessary to drug Natalee if they were going to take her out, Joran was simply going to court her and hopefully have sex with her.  There is something here that still makes me suspicious that Paulus is involved in the arranging, the drugging and raping of Natalee.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: JusticeforNatalee on December 01, 2007, 12:57:39 PM
I, too, would like clarification on the "first degree relative" issue.
I was under the impression that Paulus could get away with lying for Joran.

But could he really get away with more than that under Dutch law?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2007, 12:58:07 PM
If you can bear to hear the truth when spoken. . . then you will be a man, my son. . . .Poem IF by Rudyard Kipling which I suggest Blah read post haste.

You might also try Tai Chi, Blah.

And don't worry, I will be back this afternoon some time to further yur edification.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Ebb on December 01, 2007, 01:00:22 PM
Things that still bother me:
Yes, Tygergal. The casino photo with Paulus.
The witnesses who came forward about being raped by Joran.
Guido charged with 'heavy battery'
that aviation guy who was questioned repeatedly
Stephanie Croes/Loco Stefy's zorpia site, now gone
The DEA presence in Aruba
  and then the cartel arrests last March was it?
Amy Bradley similarities
Posner vanishing (and turning up in Detroit running a pet photo mobile)

ebb


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: blah on December 01, 2007, 01:00:55 PM
If you can bear to hear the truth when spoken. . . then you will be a man, my son. . . .Poem IF by Rudyard Kipling which I suggest Blah read post haste.

You might also try Tai Chi, Blah.

And don't worry, I will be back this afternoon some time to further yur edification.

.

you might try GFY for starters
 :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: NYC_lover on December 01, 2007, 01:01:55 PM
NYC -  RTL4 appeal news?   TIA!

Igsigs - Yes RTL4 news report: OM Aruba goes in appeal, to the Kalpoes.
http://www.rtl.nl/(/actueel/rtlnieuws/criminaliteit/articleview/)/components/actueel/rtlnieuws/2007/12_december/01/criminaliteit/1201_0800_Beroep_broers_Holloway-zaak.xml


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: NYC_lover on December 01, 2007, 01:03:25 PM
Arlene and Ramm both have no credibility, at all!

Blah and Frank are u mean, Arlene Schippers? Or however I write her name.

YES !

Ok Frank, thanks!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Observer on December 01, 2007, 01:04:11 PM
(http://img502.imageshack.us/img502/5031/nat1za0.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)
Despite being separated by state lines, cousins Rachel Allison (right) and Natalee Holloway (center) were together for all the holidays and special visits in the summer. At left is their cousin, Phillisha Holloway.
(http://img255.imageshack.us/img255/6626/nat2ma9.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)
On visits to Jonesboro, Ark., Natalee Holloway (left) would go down to the river with her cousin, Rachel Allison.
(http://img255.imageshack.us/img255/7082/nat3hc6.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)
By the time they could walk, cousins Natalee Holloway (left) and Rachel Allison already were fast friends.
(http://img49.imageshack.us/img49/3295/nat4ga5.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)


Rachel Allison, Natalee's cousin speaks

Baylor basketball's Rachel Allison lives with the memory of her missing cousin, Natalee Holloway

Friday, November 30, 2007

By Jerry Hill

**There are pictures at that website.

Not a day goes by that Rachel Allison doesn’t think of her cousin. And cry.

Nearly 2 1/2 years later, it’s still painful for the Baylor University junior basketball player even to talk about the mysterious disappearance of Natalee Holloway.

The Alabama teenager was discovered missing on May 30, 2005, when she didn’t show up for her return flight on a graduation trip to Aruba.

As first cousins separated by state lines, Allison and Holloway were close growing up. But “we had made all these plans that when we got older we were going to try to live closer to each other, because we didn’t get to see each other enough growing up,” Allison said.

“She was my only first cousin and the only girl that was my age on either side of the family,” said Allison, 20, who grew up in Jonesboro, Ark. “All the major holidays were spent together, and she’d come down to Arkansas in the summer, and we’d go to the river. In the summers, we’d call each other a lot.”

Even if she wanted to, Allison couldn’t get away from the tragic story.

On Nov. 21, Joran van der Sloot from the Netherlands and Surinamese brothers Deepak and Satish Kalpoe were rearrested on suspicion of involvement in Holloway’s death. Although her body never has been found, Aruban officials believe she was kidnapped and murdered.

“People will say something like, ‘Oh, that happened three years ago, Rachel, you should be over it by now.’ ” Allison said.

“Well, maybe I would be if it wasn’t in the news every single day. And I have to hear my family talk about it, because it’s obviously something going on in our lives and something we’re having to deal with.”

Unfulfilled plans

A two-time all-state high school basketball and volleyball player, Allison decided to leave her family roots and signed with Baylor over scholarship offers from Arkansas, Arkansas State, Mississippi, Louisiana Tech, Colorado, Texas A&M and Vanderbilt. Her mother, father and brother had played intercollegiate sports at Arkansas State in her hometown of Jonesboro.

But it was a happy day when Allison “got dropped off for college” in late May 2005, just before the start of Baylor’s first summer session.

“I think it was the summer before I got here, and (Natalee) had just found out about me going to Baylor,” Allison said. “And she’s like, ‘I’m so proud of you. I can’t wait to watch you play next year. I’ve told all my friends you’re going to Baylor. I’ve got some friends going to Baylor. I’m going to come see you all the time.’ ”

Within a matter of days of Allison’s arrival at Baylor, though, the family received the news of Holloway’s disappearance.

After graduating from Mountain Brook High School, located in an upscale suburb of Birmingham, Ala., Holloway joined 124 fellow students for a five-day trip to Aruba.

Not on return flight

According to police reports, Holloway was last seen leaving Carlos ’n Charlie’s bar and grill in Oranjestad at about 1:30 a.m. with van der Sloot and the Kalpoe brothers. When Holloway did not show up for her return flight later that day, her passport, packed luggage, camera and cell phone were found in her hotel room.

Linda Allison, Rachel’s mother, joined a massive search party that summer that included thousands of volunteers, Texas EquuSearch, Aruban and Dutch soldiers, police and FBI agents. Linda Allison’s brother, Dave Holloway, is Natalee’s father.

“My mom was in Aruba all summer, so I didn’t even see her,” Allison said. “And I was going home almost every weekend, so it was difficult. It’s difficult now.”

Away from home for the first time, Allison said there were nights “where I would come home and just lay on my bed and cry.”

She was the lone outsider in a campus apartment that housed fellow freshmen Jhasmin Player, Jessica Morrow and Tricia Abbott, who were all from the Houston area and had played together for years on the same AAU basketball team.

“As you can imagine, I had no one here to talk to, because I had just met my roommates. I didn’t really know any of them,” Allison said.

But that summer was when she also found out how supportive a team can be. Even a team full of strangers.

“Bernice (Mosby), Sophia (Young), they all took care of me,” Allison said. “So it was nice, right off the bat, to see how your team comes together. And they didn’t even know me. But they knew what was going on, so they were very supportive.

“All the girls were great.”

‘Just hope and pray’

Through her own pain, Allison also marveled at what a “rock” her mom has been.

“She’s been there for my uncle, 100 percent, the whole time,” Rachel said. “They all went to Aruba that summer to help look, and then she’s been down to Mississippi to see him. She’s done interviews. She’s just a wonderful lady.”

Linda Allison and Rachel’s dad, Tim Allison, rarely miss games in Waco and will travel up to eight hours for road trips to Big 12 Conference games. But there were anxious moments the last two years, when Allison and the Lady Bears played at tournaments in Mexico and the Bahamas.

“They would talk to the coaches before and be like, ‘Keep an eye on Rachel,’ ” she said. “But the chances of something like that happening are very slim.”

But as Allison and her family know all too sadly, it can happen. They’ve lived through the nightmare.

And even though the Aruban officials believe Holloway is dead, without a body there has been no closure for Allison or anyone else close to Natalee Holloway.

“Not really,” Allison said. “You just hope and pray.”

http://tinyurl.com/3cllq2


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Observer on December 01, 2007, 01:08:34 PM
Posner vanishing (and turning up in Detroit running a pet photo mobile)

ebb

Hi EBB..That isn't Posner running a mobile Pet Photo business it is Mr.Pink.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: JusticeforNatalee on December 01, 2007, 01:09:33 PM
Paulus can be charged with illegally disposing of a corpse, regardless of who caused Natalee to become a corpse. He cannot be charged with advising his son or forced to testifying against his son, unless he used his official position to advise his son.

He already waived his right not to testify vs his Son. I'M not sure what that all means but he should have given up the "Family Privlage" BS where he can lie and obstruct the Investigation as well. I am very happy Mos has mentioned PVDS as being involved but I can't be confident there will be justice until I see PVDS in cuffs again.

(http://img90.imageshack.us/img90/7181/joran8yz1.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)




Thanks for reminding us, *******, that Paulus had waived that right.
It is so hard to tell what is actually Dutch law and what is misuse of Dutch law--because we have been fed so many lines by Schippers, etc.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: wizard on December 01, 2007, 01:10:31 PM
IMO of course.

Mos is just the latest in a long line of pied pipers that has lead the well intentionned posters on this board right into the sea.

I stopped believeing early on mainly because I'm so cynical. Talk is so cheap.

I've watched you get your hopes dashed time and time again by these charlatains.

If they had any semblance of a case they would be filing charges. It's not rocket science.

Referring to TV, my parents used to preach "Don't believe anything you hear and half of what you see."

A boat looking for a 2 1/2 year old body in the ocean? Please...........


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on December 01, 2007, 01:11:13 PM
For some reason I am actually encouraged by where we are right now.

Already it has gotten out through the investigation that the Kalpoes went home and that Deepak came back at approx. 3 AM, but Satish didn't. This is in itself an indication that:

1. The crime cannot be pinned on the K2 (to deflect from Joran)
2. Their involvement MAY... MAY... have been less in the actual crime where Natalee died.
3. Just the fact that we have a little bit of "timeline" in focus now after so long wondering When, Where, Yada, Yada is a positive. It shows that the investigation is turning up SOMETHING.

IMO this development today puts Joran MORE on the hotseat. The Judge has declared that a manslaughter-murder has taken place and that K2 likely didn't actually do it themselves. So much for taco-boy's whitewash attempts. By process of elimination, there's only one other person who was with Natalee and he's got some 'splainin' to do.

It would be interesting to know if BAIL would be allowed in the US for the "lesser" charges which the judge clearly believes the K2 are going to be up for. Ain't no one skated today. I am not sure if they would have been kept in custody here in this country for whatever it was they did in rendering help. 

I am thinking that Satish may be looking a little better now.

It is obvious now that Joran's crimes will need to be proven now FIRST, and then the K2's activities will be better understood. The Judge is basing their amount of guilt on what Joran did, and how much they helped him after the fact. I think that's significant.

I am concerned that we (with the evidence as it stands now) are not so far able to get to the underlying crime of drugging/rape at this point but I think it can come out if the prosecutor stays at Joran HARD. Proving K2 complicity in THAT aspect (in other words, the planning of the crime) is still a tough nut to crack. But hey, the refugees don't care that much about K2 anyway, they are all worried about Joran. They need to be, IMO.

At least right now, we are starting to get some idea of what happened to Natalee and she may be found. We didn't have that a week ago.

Let Us Continue.
Love this post SB
ITA
:)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: NYC_lover on December 01, 2007, 01:12:51 PM
Not you, NYC!  Blah picks on me because I am Dutch-American and he is a mean old man.

I was wondering if you could explain why it is not a crime for a first degree relative to assist one who has committed a crime.  I don't think Paulus will be charged for assisting Joran but some do.

.

Ok, Anna I understand. Cool u are Dutch-American, please tell me more about it.... :oops:

In the Musings thread please  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 01, 2007, 01:14:35 PM
Things that still bother me:
Yes, Tygergal. The casino photo with Paulus.
The witnesses who came forward about being raped by Joran.
Guido charged with 'heavy battery'
that aviation guy who was questioned repeatedly
Stephanie Croes/Loco Stefy's zorpia site, now gone (2 different people Loco Stef's site is still up)
The DEA presence in Aruba
  and then the cartel arrests last March was it?
Amy Bradley similarities
Posner vanishing (and turning up in Detroit running a pet photo mobile)(not Posner - that is Paul Brough aka Mr. Pink:  Posner is most likely still in Aruba.  Paul Brough is in Michigan)
ebb

My corrections in RED


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: wreck on December 01, 2007, 01:16:49 PM
IMO of course.

Mos is just the latest in a long line of pied pipers that has lead the well intentionned posters on this board right into the sea.

I stopped believeing early on mainly because I'm so cynical. Talk is so cheap.

I've watched you get your hopes dashed time and time again by these charlatains.

If they had any semblance of a case they would be filing charges. It's not rocket science.

Referring to TV, my parents used to preach "Don't believe anything you hear and half of what you see."

A boat looking for a 2 1/2 year old body in the ocean? Please...........
Ignorance is bliss. (I take great offense to how you characterize us "rats" here at SM -- you can stick it!)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 01, 2007, 01:18:22 PM
Posted at RU by HannieC:

HannieC Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 12:37 pm   

Speaking of Guido....

There´s a program here on tv called `Missing`, it was yesterday evening on tv, and they had a tiny fragment about this case. They received a letter from a ´psychic´ in which he stated that Guido murdered Natalee....fwiw...

And then they went ahead with the program..... 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Observer on December 01, 2007, 01:21:42 PM
Posted at RU by HannieC:

HannieC Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 12:37 pm   

Speaking of Guido....

There´s a program here on tv called `Missing`, it was yesterday evening on tv, and they had a tiny fragment about this case. They received a letter from a ´psychic´ in which he stated that Guido murdered Natalee....fwiw...

And then they went ahead with the program..... 


I'M sure the Wevers are gonna love that..His parents were the ones that were threatening everyone after his release to not make accusations or speculate about him publicly.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: blah on December 01, 2007, 01:23:03 PM
Does anyone know what time Beth Dave and JQK are supposed to meet with Mos?

Should we expect to hear anything from them afterwards?

Do we know how long they plan to stay on the island?





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Port Valerie on December 01, 2007, 01:24:27 PM
The Chicago Tribune today:


A friend of the girl's mother, Beth Twitty, who traveled to Aruba with her this week said Twitty was upset by the decision.

"She was getting her life back to normal before all this happened," Carol Standiser said. "It would have been better to let things go the way they were going."


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 01, 2007, 01:24:43 PM
Does anyone know what time Beth Dave and JQK are supposed to meet with Mos?

Should we expect to hear anything from them afterwards?

Do we know how long they plan to stay on the island?





No


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Puzzler on December 01, 2007, 01:25:07 PM
SIMPLISTIC COMPARISON

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/usvsarubacopy.jpg)

This is good, Klaas.  Thanks!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: blah on December 01, 2007, 01:25:26 PM
Posted at RU by HannieC:

HannieC Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 12:37 pm   

Speaking of Guido....

There´s a program here on tv called `Missing`, it was yesterday evening on tv, and they had a tiny fragment about this case. They received a letter from a ´psychic´ in which he stated that Guido murdered Natalee....fwiw...

And then they went ahead with the program..... 


I'M sure the Wevers are gonna love that..His parents were the ones that were threatening everyone after his release to not make accusations or speculate about him publicly.

funny that they think they can prevent anyone from having an opinion of their little princess

errrrr  son



errrr  whatever


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Puzzler on December 01, 2007, 01:26:32 PM
There are some things that still haunt me about this case and simplifying it is easy but then those "not so simple" things come back to haunt me. 

Some are the behavior of Joran with his parents.  He seems to be assuring them that he is going to take care of them by patting Anita on the head, as a child would do a small pet or as we recall from days (crap) before integration, the way a slave holder would pat his favorite slave on the head as if to say he/she was going to be taken care of.

Then there are the statements of Joran where he always infers he is doing this for his family, he is doing what they would want him to do, he is suffering for them.

Then Deepak's statement of "your own dad, unbelievable."  At that point, Joran seems to bristle and tells him he is doing this for his daddy.  Joran reminds them they are responsible for his daddy going to jail.

Then there is the picture of Paulus at the casino near Natalee.

The biggest question of all, "Why did they drug her?"  Why did they feel it was necessary to drug Natalee if they were going to take her out, Joran was simply going to court her and hopefully have sex with her.  There is something here that still makes me suspicious that Paulus is involved in the arranging, the drugging and raping of Natalee.


Yep!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 01, 2007, 01:27:13 PM
IMO of course.

Mos is just the latest in a long line of pied pipers that has lead the well intentionned posters on this board right into the sea.

I stopped believeing early on mainly because I'm so cynical. Talk is so cheap.

I've watched you get your hopes dashed time and time again by these charlatains.

If they had any semblance of a case they would be filing charges. It's not rocket science.

Referring to TV, my parents used to preach "Don't believe anything you hear and half of what you see."

A boat looking for a 2 1/2 year old body in the ocean? Please...........

Wizard, as I have stated before, all we have and all Natalee's family and the millions of people who care about justice, is faith/hope. 

We are all welcome here to express our opinions, and that is a great thing, because few places allow us that liberty, particularly those sites which are operated and managed by some who appear to have taken leave of their senses, if they ever in fact, had any.

I am not speaking for management or anyone else here, completely from a selfish standpoint, but you, who have tried on the few occasions you post here, to inject the rantings of this group of ill-intentioned nitwits, have no ground to stand on when calling someone a rat. 

We know that you are a purveyor of these sites, highly watched by law enforcement, and that is fine, you are free to do that, but for the sake of your own dignity, don't embarrass yourself further by propagating their fantasies in the name of justice and caring.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: blah on December 01, 2007, 01:30:01 PM
OH!

Thats gonna leave a mark.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 01, 2007, 01:30:12 PM
Exactly, Tyler.

And while Paulus is not the brightest bulb on the tree (Anna using festive, Christmas analogy) he is smart enough to go just so far and no more.  For example, he might help Joran arrange for disposal but not actually handle the corpse to skirt being charged with illegal disposal.

Clever if stupid.

.

Simian Says: June 26th, 2005 at 10:52 pm
The elder agreed to speak, but he he loves the boy too much. he knows the passages of the palace too well. So the Babylonians must make sure the check mate is iron-clad.
Something rotten from The Hague will have to make the third act play out. [/i]


Sorry. I know this is not what you want as your back up, but it's the best I can do on short notice.  Paulus will never be charged...that is why the premeditated charge did not work...KJ knew it wouldn't stick and therefore she used it. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: MuffyBee on December 01, 2007, 01:30:36 PM
IMO of course.

Mos is just the latest in a long line of pied pipers that has lead the well intentionned posters on this board right into the sea.

I stopped believeing early on mainly because I'm so cynical. Talk is so cheap.

I've watched you get your hopes dashed time and time again by these charlatains.

If they had any semblance of a case they would be filing charges. It's not rocket science.

Referring to TV, my parents used to preach "Don't believe anything you hear and half of what you see."

A boat looking for a 2 1/2 year old body in the ocean? Please...........


My, my, my.  Don't you have it all figured out.  You are entitled to your opinion.  Yes, we monkeys have had our hopes dashed a number of times, but does that mean we should give up?  There are a lot of monkeys, including myself that aren't giving up, even 2 1/2 years later.  And some of us believe there is a "semblance of a case".  It's not necessary yet to file charges imo.  And, what do you know about looking in the ocean for a 2 1/2 year old body?!  Obviously not much.  There is a group of professionals that are headed to try to do just that.  They believe they can find Natalee.  Maybe not a whole body, but maybe enough...

Right now, none of use here that I know of have all the answers.  But we believe in justice for Natalee.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: MuffyBee on December 01, 2007, 01:31:56 PM
Correction:  "us"  not "use"


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: blah on December 01, 2007, 01:33:17 PM
I have seen documentaries where boats have found bodies, amoung other things, 100's of years old.


In the ocean!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: robots on December 01, 2007, 01:34:19 PM
some people need to STFU

 :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Katysmom on December 01, 2007, 01:34:29 PM
IMO of course.

Mos is just the latest in a long line of pied pipers that has lead the well intentionned posters on this board right into the sea.

I stopped believeing early on mainly because I'm so cynical. Talk is so cheap.

I've watched you get your hopes dashed time and time again by these charlatains.

If they had any semblance of a case they would be filing charges. It's not rocket science.

Referring to TV, my parents used to preach "Don't believe anything you hear and half of what you see."

A boat looking for a 2 1/2 year old body in the ocean? Please...........

Wizard, as I have stated before, all we have and all Natalee's family and the millions of people who care about justice, is faith/hope. 

We are all welcome here to express our opinions, and that is a great thing, because few places allow us that liberty, particularly those sites which are operated and managed by some who appear to have taken leave of their senses, if they ever in fact, had any.

I am not speaking for management or anyone else here, completely from a selfish standpoint, but you, who have tried on the few occasions you post here, to inject the rantings of this group of ill-intentioned nitwits, have no ground to stand on when calling someone a rat. 

We know that you are a purveyor of these sites, highly watched by law enforcement, and that is fine, you are free to do that, but for the sake of your own dignity, don't embarrass yourself further by propagating their fantasies in the name of justice and caring.

You can speak for me anytime, Tyler! 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 01, 2007, 01:35:30 PM
I was totally without computer access on Friday, 11/30/2007. The following is from that day's Diario.

http://www.diario-aruba.com/2007/11/30/ (http://www.diario-aruba.com/2007/11/30/)

Michael Saladin's case apparently postponed. This is what I recall about this odd case: Saladin is an American ex-pat, I think he used to work for NASA. A choller had asked Mrs. Saladin about washing her car; she declined. The choller allegedly threatened to damaged the car and slashed two tires. Mr. Saladin gave chase with a gun. The chase led to a public place, a gym I think. The gun brandishing apparently is the leading issue here. Meanwhile, nothing has been done about the choller who slashed the tires. I don't recall the date when this happened (although it is in the M&C thread, but it was months ago and Saladin apparently has been in jail since. (Although he was hospitalized shortly thereafter; he is not young, maybe 50s, and apparently had BP or similar health problem after the incident.

 snipped.......

I wonder if this is Michaels Mom or Grandma?? I know, I know...'Saladin' is probably a common name in Aruba  :roll:
OBITUARIO
http://www.diario-aruba.com/2007/11/30/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: blah on December 01, 2007, 01:36:05 PM
some people need to STFU

 :cool:


 :smt045 :smt045 :smt045



 :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Observer on December 01, 2007, 01:36:07 PM
Posted at RU by HannieC:

HannieC Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 12:37 pm   

Speaking of Guido....

There´s a program here on tv called `Missing`, it was yesterday evening on tv, and they had a tiny fragment about this case. They received a letter from a ´psychic´ in which he stated that Guido murdered Natalee....fwiw...

And then they went ahead with the program..... 


I wonder if they received that letter from the same psychic that did the sketch from Haunted Evidence? Only one person that picture looked like.IMO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: MuffyBee on December 01, 2007, 01:36:10 PM
I have seen documentaries where boats have found bodies, amoung other things, 100's of years old.


In the ocean!



 :thumleft: Right on.  There is a group of people that have put their time, expertise, money, equipment and knowledge to try to recover Natalee Holloway's remains.  They want to do this so poo-poo it all you want Wizard.  It isn't costing you a dime. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: robots on December 01, 2007, 01:36:10 PM
some people need to STFU

 :cool:

the wizard in the wizard of OZ, was not a real wizard

he was a phony  :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: robots on December 01, 2007, 01:37:08 PM
some people need to STFU

 :cool:


 :smt045 :smt045 :smt045



 :cool:


:) yepp


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: MuffyBee on December 01, 2007, 01:42:31 PM
Emily Latella said "Who is Gizzard and why are chicken entrails so interested in making negative comments on the Natalee Holloway thread?"


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: blah on December 01, 2007, 01:42:43 PM
IMO of course.

Mos is just the latest in a long line of pied pipers that has lead the well intentionned posters on this board right into the sea.

I stopped believeing early on mainly because I'm so cynical. Talk is so cheap.

I've watched you get your hopes dashed time and time again by these charlatains.

If they had any semblance of a case they would be filing charges. It's not rocket science.

Referring to TV, my parents used to preach "Don't believe anything you hear and half of what you see."

A boat looking for a 2 1/2 year old body in the ocean? Please...........

Wizard, as I have stated before, all we have and all Natalee's family and the millions of people who care about justice, is faith/hope. 

We are all welcome here to express our opinions, and that is a great thing, because few places allow us that liberty, particularly those sites which are operated and managed by some who appear to have taken leave of their senses, if they ever in fact, had any.

I am not speaking for management or anyone else here, completely from a selfish standpoint, but you, who have tried on the few occasions you post here, to inject the rantings of this group of ill-intentioned nitwits, have no ground to stand on when calling someone a rat. 

We know that you are a purveyor of these sites, highly watched by law enforcement, and that is fine, you are free to do that, but for the sake of your own dignity, don't embarrass yourself further by propagating their fantasies in the name of justice and caring.

You can speak for me anytime, Tyler! 

From now on, whenever I see someone who needs to be told off, I'm just going to refer them to Tyler  :smt045 :smt045


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Buckeye on December 01, 2007, 01:45:09 PM
[quote author=blah



I'M sure the Wevers are gonna love that..His parents were the ones that were threatening everyone after his release to not make accusations or speculate about him publicly.
[/quote]

funny that they think they can prevent anyone from having an opinion of their little princess

errrrr  son



errrr  whatever

[/quote]

 :lol: :lol: :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: blah on December 01, 2007, 01:46:28 PM
(I, myslef, am not exempt. From that)




 :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: NYC_lover on December 01, 2007, 01:46:46 PM
Emily Latella said "Who is Gizzard and why are chicken entrails so interested in making negative comments on the Natalee Holloway thread?"
MuffyBee - Who is Emily? Is she a poster here?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 01, 2007, 01:50:58 PM
Whew!  I am glad you guys like me just a little...especially Tylergal.  :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: MuffyBee on December 01, 2007, 01:52:04 PM
Emily Latella said "Who is Gizzard and why are chicken entrails so interested in making negative comments on the Natalee Holloway thread?"
MuffyBee - Who is Emily? Is she a poster here?

Emily Latella was a character played by Gilda Radner, who was on a comedy show popular in the U.S. called "Saturday Night Live". The character Emily would get things very mixed up.  Here is a link:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emily_Litella


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: igsigs on December 01, 2007, 01:54:05 PM
FOX - pffft

Reporting that the Ks are scheduled to be released shortly. I don't think they even know there is an appeal.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: MuffyBee on December 01, 2007, 01:54:38 PM
Whew!  I am glad you guys like me just a little...especially Tylergal.  :roll:

Never doubt yourself or your worth, Lala's Mom...

I have visions of Sally Field:  "They like me.  They like me."  LOL

I don't always agree with every poster all the time, but I would say there are very, very few that I don't like.   :D  I've even come to at least respect some posters because they stay with their opinion and support it, even it isn't popular. 

You're alright Lala's   :smt052


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Puzzler on December 01, 2007, 01:55:32 PM
In a little over an hour, 2K will be released.

Surely, they will be watched 24/7.

Paulus, or one of his minions, will try to find out what 2K were questioned on.

I hope the entire island is bugged!! (Could happen from the sky)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: NYC_lover on December 01, 2007, 01:57:13 PM
Emily Latella said "Who is Gizzard and why are chicken entrails so interested in making negative comments on the Natalee Holloway thread?"
MuffyBee - Who is Emily? Is she a poster here?

Emily Latella was a character played by Gilda Radner, who was on a comedy show popular in the U.S. called "Saturday Night Live". The character Emily would get things very mixed up.  Here is a link:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emily_Litella

Ok, I understand, thank you!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Puzzler on December 01, 2007, 01:58:10 PM
Whew!  I am glad you guys like me just a little...especially Tylergal.  :roll:

Never doubt yourself or your worth, Lala's Mom...

I have visions of Sally Field:  "They like me.  They like me."  LOL

I don't always agree with every poster all the time, but I would say there are very, very few that I don't like.   :D  I've even come to at least respect some posters because they stay with their opinion and support it, even it isn't popular. 

You're alright Lala's   :smt052

Lalas....we don't know each other very well yet....but I really like you.  I love those litte bits of Shango/Simian you throw out every now and then.  Surprisingly, a number of them fit the situation...after we've found out something new and make comparisons.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 01, 2007, 01:59:13 PM
In a little over an hour, 2K will be released.

Surely, they will be watched 24/7.

Paulus, or one of his minions, will try to find out what 2K were questioned on.

I hope the entire island is bugged!! (Could happen from the sky)

If there is any way that the Kalpoes know where they put Natalee..they better be looking over their shoulders...it won't just be the "good" guys watching this time.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: wreck on December 01, 2007, 01:59:16 PM
Whew!  I am glad you guys like me just a little...especially Tylergal.  :roll:

Never doubt yourself or your worth, Lala's Mom...

I have visions of Sally Field:  "They like me.  They like me."  LOL

I don't always agree with every poster all the time, but I would say there are very, very few that I don't like.   :D  I've even come to at least respect some posters because they stay with their opinion and support it, even it isn't popular. 

You're alright Lala's   :smt052
Tylergal was a little more diplomatic/eloquent than me -- all I could say was "stick-it" !  :silent:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 01, 2007, 02:00:38 PM
Whew!  I am glad you guys like me just a little...especially Tylergal.  :roll:

Never doubt yourself or your worth, Lala's Mom...

I have visions of Sally Field:  "They like me.  They like me."  LOL

I don't always agree with every poster all the time, but I would say there are very, very few that I don't like.   :D  I've even come to at least respect some posters because they stay with their opinion and support it, even it isn't popular. 

You're alright Lala's   :smt052

Lalas....we don't know each other very well yet....but I really like you.  I love those litte bits of Shango/Simian you throw out every now and then.  Surprisingly, a number of them fit the situation...after we've found out something new and make comparisons.

Thank you, thank you very much...using my best Elvis impersonation.  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: MuffyBee on December 01, 2007, 02:00:40 PM
Whew!  I am glad you guys like me just a little...especially Tylergal.  :roll:

Never doubt yourself or your worth, Lala's Mom...

I have visions of Sally Field:  "They like me.  They like me."  LOL

I don't always agree with every poster all the time, but I would say there are very, very few that I don't like.   :D  I've even come to at least respect some posters because they stay with their opinion and support it, even it isn't popular. 

You're alright Lala's   :smt052
Tylergal was a little more diplomatic/eloquent than me -- all I could say was "stick-it" !  :silent:

"Gizzard" worked for me, I mean for Emily. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Puzzler on December 01, 2007, 02:00:40 PM
In a little over an hour, 2K will be released.

Surely, they will be watched 24/7.

Paulus, or one of his minions, will try to find out what 2K were questioned on.

I hope the entire island is bugged!! (Could happen from the sky)

If there is any way that the Kalpoes know where they put Natalee..they better be looking over their shoulders...it won't just be the "good" guys watching this time.

I'm sure you're right on this one.   :cool:




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Katysmom on December 01, 2007, 02:03:34 PM
FOX - pffft

Reporting that the Ks are scheduled to be released shortly. I don't think they even know there is an appeal.

Will they be held while the appeal process is going on?  Or will they still be released for now and if the appeal is won would then have to return to jail?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: blah on December 01, 2007, 02:04:03 PM
Do we know anything at all about Jorans accomodations while he is in the pokey other than he has a bible?

For instance, do we know if he is in general population or if there is an area he has access to where other prisoners may be?

I would have to think that there are some people in there that his father may have helped put there.  I would think some of these guys would like to get a chance to express their gratitude - yanno?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Katysmom on December 01, 2007, 02:05:28 PM
Do we know anything at all about Jorans accomodations while he is in the pokey other than he has a bible?

For instance, do we know if he is in general population or if there is an area he has access to where other prisoners may be?

I would have to think that there are some people in there that his father may have helped put there.  I would think some of these guys would like to get a chance to express their gratitude - yanno?

We can only hope!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 01, 2007, 02:06:45 PM
Do we know anything at all about Jorans accomodations while he is in the pokey other than he has a bible?

For instance, do we know if he is in general population or if there is an area he has access to where other prisoners may be?

I would have to think that there are some people in there that his father may have helped put there.  I would think some of these guys would like to get a chance to express their gratitude - yanno?

We are hoping he's bunking with Bubba. :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Observer on December 01, 2007, 02:09:21 PM
If you haven't written Fox News please do so. Not only is this guy misinformed but he is lying through his teeth! We sat through 30 months of Aruban lies and its BS that Natalee gets screwed even in our own media. When is someone gonna confront him with his BS that he is spewing to the American public?

Don't let Joe T Scrooge you out of your Holiday viewing of the Holiday Case :wink:

(http://img161.imageshack.us/img161/1404/joetscrugejs7.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)
http://www.scroogeyourself.com/?id=1123256495


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Katysmom on December 01, 2007, 02:10:57 PM
If you haven't written Fox News please do so. Not only is this guy misinformed but he is lying through his teeth! We sat through 30 months of Aruban lies and its BS that Natalee gets screwed even in our own media. When is someone gonna confront him with his BS that he is spewing to the American public?


Don't let Joe T Scrooge you out of your Holiday viewing of the Holiday Case :wink:

(http://img161.imageshack.us/img161/1404/joetscrugejs7.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)
http://www.scroogeyourself.com/?id=1123256495

I agree with you!  Where can we write?  It does no good to write to Greta, herself; we need to write to her bosses!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 01, 2007, 02:12:33 PM
Posted by Glenda at RU:

Glenda Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 2:06 pm   
Beth spends 6 hours with OM

Word on the street, she was being questioned for six hours. Dave and JQK also there. 


English translation:  Hans Mos spent 6 hours with Beth, Dave and JQK going over the case against JK2 & P


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Puzzler on December 01, 2007, 02:14:34 PM
Posted by Glenda at RU:

Glenda Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 2:06 pm   
Beth spends 6 hours with OM

Word on the street, she was being questioned for six hours. Dave and JQK also there. 


English translation:  Hans Mos spent 6 hours with Beth, Dave and JQK going over the case against JK2 & P

Wow!!  Sounds like Mos at least listened to the info Beth wanted to be able to tell him about.  Hopefully, he shared some of his knowledge, too.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 01, 2007, 02:15:15 PM
Please forgive if this has been posted. Photo of Dop Kruimel

The photo is from this site>> http://tinyurl.com/2t9w94

Sxcroll down about 3/4 of page. PLEASE NOTE!! GRAPHIC photo of a starving dog on this site...just warning you. The site is korps-politie-suriname



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Helen Back on December 01, 2007, 02:18:29 PM
Posted by Glenda at RU:

Glenda Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 2:06 pm   
Beth spends 6 hours with OM

Word on the street, she was being questioned for six hours. Dave and JQK also there. 


English translation:  Hans Mos spent 6 hours with Beth, Dave and JQK going over the case against JK2 & P

Somehow Mr. Mos's comment, "I hope I can explain this to them" turned into "they are being questioned", by Glenda Renfro.

Hey Julia Renfro, (Greta's good source), if you get up earlier, you can be wrong more often.

I especially love her favorite phrase, "word on the street".  Not a phrase Julia Renfro should use.

 :lol: :lol: :lol:





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: blah on December 01, 2007, 02:19:18 PM
Posted by Glenda at RU:

Glenda Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 2:06 pm   
Beth spends 6 hours with OM

Word on the street, she was being questioned for six hours. Dave and JQK also there. 


English translation:  Hans Mos spent 6 hours with Beth, Dave and JQK going over the case against JK2 & P

I hope she was questioned.  Since she conducted the initial investigation and solved the case within hours of arriving on Aruba, she may be able to provide Mos with some valuable intel that only she knows.  Wouldnt that be great, if some day when the perps are all behind bars, that Mos makes a statement "....and I would like to extend a special thanks to Beth for helping with the investigation, we could not have done it without her..."



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Observer on December 01, 2007, 02:19:51 PM

I agree with you!  Where can we write?  It does no good to write to Greta, herself; we need to write to her bosses!!

Thats a good question. She doesn't respond to my emails either and I dont know how effective writing in her blog is. Must be a way to contact her producers and bosses  :-?? He has stepped way over the line accusing Jossy of fabricating evidence,lying about this case and no one challenges him or even confronts him on his wrong information.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 01, 2007, 02:20:53 PM
Posted by Glenda at RU:

Glenda Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 2:06 pm   
Beth spends 6 hours with OM

Word on the street, she was being questioned for six hours. Dave and JQK also there. 


English translation:  Hans Mos spent 6 hours with Beth, Dave and JQK going over the case against JK2 & P

It has been about 2 years since Glenda a/k/a Bondia a/k/a Julia Renfro amongst many other names, told us she was privy to all the dossiers and information in this case, and tried to pin our hopes on some weird guy about whom she fabricated a story of his following and glaring at her, even to the Mickey D place, concerning some monkeys to the point they forgot to send her batteries for her camera so she could film him for us.

So interesting that is no longer in the loop and has to refer to 'word on the street.'  I wonder what 'word on the street' says about the author of this little tid-bit.  I am sure if it was posted here, Lala's would be sharpening her pencils and covering her ears. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: blah on December 01, 2007, 02:23:20 PM
Please forgive if this has been posted. Photo of Dop Kruimel

The photo is from this site>> http://tinyurl.com/2t9w94

Sxcroll down about 3/4 of page. PLEASE NOTE!! GRAPHIC photo of a starving dog on this site...just warning you. The site is korps-politie-suriname



(http://www.korps-politie-suriname.com/nieuws/nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/archief%20nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/2007/2007-09-nieuwsbronnen-internationaal/09-14-dop-kruimel.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: robots on December 01, 2007, 02:23:25 PM
Renho is working the streeeeeeets

sounds about right

 :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 01, 2007, 02:25:37 PM
Robots, shhh! Lala's is here. :D

Nut 44x4, what is at that site?  I know it must be graphic, but could you tell us in 200 words or less and what is the "dog" you refer to? Is it someone who works the streets?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: robots on December 01, 2007, 02:26:08 PM
Evil is everywhere

what a gas bag

probably has to pay the customers  :cool: :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: blah on December 01, 2007, 02:26:23 PM
Any idea what this means???


 Dompig getuigt in rijbewijzenzaak

ORANJESTAD — Ex-politiecommissaris Gerald Dompig wordt donderdag opgeroepen als getuige tijdens de rechtszitting over de grote rijbewijzenzwendel. De rechter heeft dit verzoek van advocaat Paul van der Sloot vorige week toegewezen. Behalve Dompig zal ook het Hoofd Staf Korpschef Jeannette Richardson haar opwachting maken als getuige-deskundige. (Amigoe)





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: robots on December 01, 2007, 02:26:56 PM
Robots, shhh! Lala's is here. :D

Nut 44x4, what is at that site?  I know it must be graphic, but could you tell us in 200 words or less and what is the "dog" you refer to? Is it someone who works the streets?

<------locking up my lips  :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: robots on December 01, 2007, 02:27:38 PM
Any idea what this means???


 Dompig getuigt in rijbewijzenzaak

ORANJESTAD — Ex-politiecommissaris Gerald Dompig wordt donderdag opgeroepen als getuige tijdens de rechtszitting over de grote rijbewijzenzwendel. De rechter heeft dit verzoek van advocaat Paul van der Sloot vorige week toegewezen. Behalve Dompig zal ook het Hoofd Staf Korpschef Jeannette Richardson haar opwachting maken als getuige-deskundige. (Amigoe)





dompig is an ass  :shock:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 01, 2007, 02:28:40 PM
Renho is working the streeeeeeets

sounds about right

 :cool:

 :D :lol: :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: private eye on December 01, 2007, 02:29:00 PM
I still say all we have heard is good news. The court determined that there is significant credible news that the brothers helped illegally dispose of a corpse, which is punishable by 3 years of incarceration, which is a significant amount of time for a young 20 something year old to spend locked up, Beth has a credible sign that Natalee is dead and can forget about the nagging fear that she is alive, a sex slave, and in need of Beth rescuing her, Joran is locked up facing charges of voluntary manslaughter etc,.which is supported by the court's decision concerning the brothers, and if all of that is correct, then Paulus will be facing at a minimum the same charge the brothers face eventually. I hope the monkeys are fretting for nothing!!!!!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: robots on December 01, 2007, 02:30:02 PM
I still say all we have heard is good news. The court determined that there is significant credible news that the brothers helped illegally dispose of a corpse, which is punishable by 3 years of incarceration, which is a significant amount of time for a young 20 something year old to spend locked up, Beth has a credible sign that Natalee is dead and can forget about the nagging fear that she is alive, a sex slave, and in need of Beth rescuing her, Joran is locked up facing charges of voluntary manslaughter etc,.which is supported by the court's decision concerning the brothers, and if all of that is correct, then Paulus will be facing at a minimum the same charge the brothers face eventually. I hope the monkeys are fretting for nothing!!!!!!!!


 :cool:yep


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 01, 2007, 02:30:33 PM
Any idea what this means???


 Dompig getuigt in rijbewijzenzaak

ORANJESTAD — Ex-politiecommissaris Gerald Dompig wordt donderdag opgeroepen als getuige tijdens de rechtszitting over de grote rijbewijzenzwendel. De rechter heeft dit verzoek van advocaat Paul van der Sloot vorige week toegewezen. Behalve Dompig zal ook het Hoofd Staf Korpschef Jeannette Richardson haar opwachting maken als getuige-deskundige. (Amigoe)





Drivers license fraud case:

Dompig testify in drivers license matter

ORANJESTAD - Ex-politiecommissaris Gerald Dompig Thursday is called as getuige during the sitting of the court concerning the large drivers license fraud. The judge has last week assigned Paul of of the ditch to this request of lawyer. Except Dompig also the head staff korpschef Jeannette Richardson will make its opwachting as getuige-deskundige. (Amigoe


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Puzzler on December 01, 2007, 02:32:51 PM
Any idea what this means???


 Dompig getuigt in rijbewijzenzaak

ORANJESTAD — Ex-politiecommissaris Gerald Dompig wordt donderdag opgeroepen als getuige tijdens de rechtszitting over de grote rijbewijzenzwendel. De rechter heeft dit verzoek van advocaat Paul van der Sloot vorige week toegewezen. Behalve Dompig zal ook het Hoofd Staf Korpschef Jeannette Richardson haar opwachting maken als getuige-deskundige. (Amigoe)





dompig is an ass  :shock:

 :lol:



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: robots on December 01, 2007, 02:32:53 PM
time to step up the BOYCOTT issues again

this creepy little island will suffer and suffer and suffer

they aint seen nothing yet - an organized small group can shut things down

BIG TIME

been there done that


time to do it again



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: private eye on December 01, 2007, 02:33:17 PM
Julia Crackhoe would not only have to pay for sex, she would also have to do as the boys of Aruba do, she would have to medicate her jons with a Viagra type drug, megga doses:::::)))))))) As for her Momma, even megga doses wouldn't help.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: private eye on December 01, 2007, 02:35:20 PM
I apologize for that tacky post, but I hate those 2 women no matter how hard I pray about it


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: NYC_lover on December 01, 2007, 02:37:49 PM
Any idea what this means???


 Dompig getuigt in rijbewijzenzaak

ORANJESTAD — Ex-politiecommissaris Gerald Dompig wordt donderdag opgeroepen als getuige tijdens de rechtszitting over de grote rijbewijzenzwendel. De rechter heeft dit verzoek van advocaat Paul van der Sloot vorige week toegewezen. Behalve Dompig zal ook het Hoofd Staf Korpschef Jeannette Richardson haar opwachting maken als getuige-deskundige. (Amigoe)


Blah - this means: Ex-police-chief Gerald Dompig get a witness role in a great driving lincense scandal in the court thursday.
Also Jeannetter Richardson get a witness role.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 01, 2007, 02:41:26 PM
Posted at RU by HannieC:

HannieC Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 12:37 pm   

Speaking of Guido....

There´s a program here on tv called `Missing`, it was yesterday evening on tv, and they had a tiny fragment about this case. They received a letter from a ´psychic´ in which he stated that Guido murdered Natalee....fwiw...

And then they went ahead with the program..... 


mmmmmm.....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: robots on December 01, 2007, 02:49:14 PM
jealous lover


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 01, 2007, 02:51:54 PM
Challenge to Simian!!  Yoo hoo!  Answer me this....just once, please.

Simian Says: June 22nd, 2005 at 4:56 pm
The 5th suspect has an alibi so strong that he has everybody baffled.



Who is the 5th suspect???  Email me at cindoal@yahoo.com.  If you are still around and have the guts to spit it out this time...email me...I want to know.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 01, 2007, 02:54:59 PM
Robots, shhh! Lala's is here. :D

Nut 44x4, what is at that site?  I know it must be graphic, but could you tell us in 200 words or less and what is the "dog" you refer to? Is it someone who works the streets?

No, lmaoooo. The site is korps-politie-suriname POLITE web site w/ news all around ABC islands as well as Suriname. There is a story re: starving dog w/ gross photo. I just wanted you guys to know that before you click on it. It has nothing to do with the case.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 01, 2007, 02:56:24 PM
Robots, shhh! Lala's is here. :D

Nut 44x4, what is at that site?  I know it must be graphic, but could you tell us in 200 words or less and what is the "dog" you refer to? Is it someone who works the streets?

No, lmaoooo. The site is korps-politie-suriname POLITE web site w/ news all around ABC islands as well as Suriname. There is a story re: starving dog w/ gross photo. I just wanted you guys to know that before you click on it. It has nothing to do with the case.



The site is where I found the photo of Dop Kruimel



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: MuffyBee on December 01, 2007, 02:57:18 PM


Here's to refresh some memories...

May 23, 2006 9:27 am US/Eastern

Holloway Suspect Released From Detention
Casino Worker Was Detained In Connection With Teen's 2005 Disappearance

 AMSTERDAM, Netherlands (CBS News) ― A man arrested in the disappearance of an American teenager on the Dutch Caribbean island of Aruba was released from custody Tuesday, a court official said.

The release of the suspect, who CBS News has reported is Guido Wever, means he will not be transferred to Aruba, said the court official, Martine de Bruijn. His lawyer, Gerard Sprong, told Dutch television there was not enough evidence to hold his client.

A spokesman for the Dutch national prosecutor's office declined to comment, saying the case was in the hands of the Aruban public prosecutor.

The suspect was arrested last Wednesday in the town of Utrecht. He was a croupier at the casino in the Holiday Inn hotel where American Natalee Holloway was staying when she disappeared a year ago during a high school graduation trip to Aruba.

In an interview with Dutch NOS television Sunday, Spong said Aruban authorities suspected his client of "assisting in the murder, battery and kidnapping of Natalee Holloway."

"He is in good health and he is willing to cooperate with judicial authorities of Aruba in finding the truth of the disappearance of Natalee Holoway," Spong said.

Spong previously told CBS News that his client is "completely innocent" and has never seen Holloway.

Weaver's parents said in a statement that their son was "innocent until proven guilty," and they "cannot believe that he could have anything to do with the case."

They also said in a statement, "not only as parents but also as human beings we are appalled that a young girl is missing for a long time. And we sincerely hope and pray despite all odds that she will come back alive. We think that our country Aruba has made a tremendous effort so far to find her."

Holloway, of Mountain Brook, Ala., was 18 when she disappeared. She was last seen leaving a bar with three young men on May 30, 2005, the last night of her trip to Aruba.

Spong said his client is a friend of Joran van der Sloot, the last person known to have seen Holloway alive. Van der Sloot says he left Holloway alone on a beach after they kissed.

Holloway's parents are attempting to sue Van der Sloot, 18, in a New York court. Their suit alleges he imprisoned and sexually assaulted Holloway, and caused her disappearance.

While Aruban authorities are keeping all options open, they believe Holloway is most likely dead and buried on the island. Police in Aruba say prevailing currents would have likely washed her body ashore if she drowned or her body was thrown into the sea.

In January, Aruban police searched sand dunes on the northwest coast of the island. Dutch marines, the Aruban coast guard, the FBI and hundreds of volunteers have also searched the island and coastal areas for Holloway.

Authorities have arrested eight people including van der Sloot in Holloway's disappearance and released them for lack of evidence. The latest suspect was questioned three times in Aruba shortly after Holloway's disappearance and twice later by Dutch authorities, Spong said.

Holloway's mother, Beth Twitty, commented Monday in Alabama on reports of Weaver's detention and questioning by police.

"It doesn't look like to me it's excluding the original three suspects, but only widening the circle of the suspects involved in Natalee's disappearance," said Twitty.
http://tinyurl.com/3blnqy



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Puzzler on December 01, 2007, 02:57:31 PM
jealous lover

?????? :shock:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: blah on December 01, 2007, 02:58:26 PM
This winter, take some time away from work and come to Aruba!
 
We have a number of direct flights from Curacao for your convenience:
(http://www.korps-politie-suriname.com/nieuws/nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/archief%20nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/2007/2007-09-nieuwsbronnen-internationaal/cocainevlucht.jpg)

And if you survived the flight here you can jump right into your next adventure on our wonderful highways
(http://www.korps-politie-suriname.com/nieuws/nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/archief%20nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/2007/2007-09-nieuwsbronnen-internationaal/09-10-ongeluk-pos-chikito.jpg)

(http://www.korps-politie-suriname.com/nieuws/nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/archief%20nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/2007/2007-09-nieuwsbronnen-internationaal/09-08-verkeersongeluk.jpg)

(http://www.korps-politie-suriname.com/nieuws/nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/archief%20nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/2007/2007-09-nieuwsbronnen-internationaal/09-04-botsing.jpg)


You can even take a boat adventure
(http://www.korps-politie-suriname.com/nieuws/nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/archief%20nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/2007/2007-09-nieuwsbronnen-internationaal/09-03-de-jacht.jpg)

down our wonderful streets
(http://www.korps-politie-suriname.com/nieuws/nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/archief%20nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/2007/2007-09-nieuwsbronnen-internationaal/09-03-storm-water.jpg)

just be careful a hurricane
(http://www.korps-politie-suriname.com/nieuws/nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/archief%20nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/2007/2007-09-nieuwsbronnen-internationaal/09-03-felix.jpg)


Does not blow you off course
(http://www.korps-politie-suriname.com/nieuws/nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/archief%20nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/2007/2007-09-nieuwsbronnen-internationaal/09-07-marine-sar-gestrand-.jpg)


Be sure to get yourself a little pick-me-up from one of our many government sponsored crack houses on the island:
(http://www.korps-politie-suriname.com/nieuws/nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/archief%20nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/2007/2007-09-nieuwsbronnen-internationaal/09-25-cocaine.jpg)
(http://www.korps-politie-suriname.com/nieuws/nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/archief%20nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/2007/2007-09-nieuwsbronnen-internationaal/coke%20uit%20costa%20rica.jpg)

(http://www.korps-politie-suriname.com/nieuws/nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/archief%20nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/2007/2007-09-nieuwsbronnen-internationaal/cms_visual_993.jpg)

(http://www.korps-politie-suriname.com/nieuws/nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/archief%20nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/2007/2007-09-nieuwsbronnen-internationaal/heroine.jpg)


you can even get yourself a gun
(http://www.korps-politie-suriname.com/nieuws/nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/archief%20nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/2007/2007-09-nieuwsbronnen-internationaal/09-06-politie-inval.jpg)

or 2
(http://www.korps-politie-suriname.com/nieuws/nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/archief%20nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/2007/2007-09-nieuwsbronnen-internationaal/09-03-politie-wapens.jpg)

and head out to take in some of the local wildlife
(http://www.korps-politie-suriname.com/nieuws/nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/archief%20nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/2007/2007-09-nieuwsbronnen-internationaal/verwaarloosde%20hond.jpg)


Once back at your room
(http://www.korps-politie-suriname.com/nieuws/nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/archief%20nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/2007/2007-09-nieuwsbronnen-internationaal/09-21-brand.jpg)

enjoy the wonderful view of the streets below
(http://www.korps-politie-suriname.com/nieuws/nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/archief%20nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/2007/2007-09-nieuwsbronnen-internationaal/van%20kleef.jpg)

(just be careful who you talk to)
(http://www.korps-politie-suriname.com/nieuws/nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/archief%20nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/2007/2007-09-nieuwsbronnen-internationaal/heyyou.jpg)


our top notch law enforcement will ensure you a safe stay
(http://www.korps-politie-suriname.com/nieuws/nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/archief%20nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/2007/2007-09-nieuwsbronnen-internationaal/soerka.jpg)

thanks for comming and have a safe journey home
(http://www.korps-politie-suriname.com/nieuws/nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/archief%20nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/2007/2007-09-nieuwsbronnen-internationaal/09-07-marine-sar-hulp.jpg)

(http://www.korps-politie-suriname.com/nieuws/nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/archief%20nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/2007/2007-09-nieuwsbronnen-internationaal/cohen.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 01, 2007, 03:00:25 PM
I apologize for that tacky post, but I hate those 2 women no matter how hard I pray about it

I am the same way, so no need to apologize.  I have definitely had to pray about my feelings toward them.  I don't often find anyone/anything so despicable that I need to pray about it, but I have definitely had to do that of late. 

I try to keep the faith that there is so much good in the worst of them and so much bad in the best of us.  Then I pray that I can remember this and abide it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 01, 2007, 03:02:19 PM
This winter, take some time away from work and come to Aruba!
 
We have a number of direct flights from Curacao for your convenience:
(http://www.korps-politie-suriname.com/nieuws/nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/archief%20nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/2007/2007-09-nieuwsbronnen-internationaal/cocainevlucht.jpg)

And if you survived the flight here you can jump right into your next adventure on our wonderful highways
(http://www.korps-politie-suriname.com/nieuws/nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/archief%20nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/2007/2007-09-nieuwsbronnen-internationaal/09-10-ongeluk-pos-chikito.jpg)

(http://www.korps-politie-suriname.com/nieuws/nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/archief%20nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/2007/2007-09-nieuwsbronnen-internationaal/09-08-verkeersongeluk.jpg)

(http://www.korps-politie-suriname.com/nieuws/nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/archief%20nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/2007/2007-09-nieuwsbronnen-internationaal/09-04-botsing.jpg)


You can even take a boat adventure
(http://www.korps-politie-suriname.com/nieuws/nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/archief%20nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/2007/2007-09-nieuwsbronnen-internationaal/09-03-de-jacht.jpg)

down our wonderful streets
(http://www.korps-politie-suriname.com/nieuws/nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/archief%20nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/2007/2007-09-nieuwsbronnen-internationaal/09-03-storm-water.jpg)

just be careful a hurricane
(http://www.korps-politie-suriname.com/nieuws/nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/archief%20nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/2007/2007-09-nieuwsbronnen-internationaal/09-03-felix.jpg)


Does not blow you off course
(http://www.korps-politie-suriname.com/nieuws/nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/archief%20nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/2007/2007-09-nieuwsbronnen-internationaal/09-07-marine-sar-gestrand-.jpg)


Be sure to get yourself a little pick-me-up from one of our many government sponsored crack houses on the island:
(http://www.korps-politie-suriname.com/nieuws/nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/archief%20nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/2007/2007-09-nieuwsbronnen-internationaal/09-25-cocaine.jpg)
(http://www.korps-politie-suriname.com/nieuws/nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/archief%20nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/2007/2007-09-nieuwsbronnen-internationaal/coke%20uit%20costa%20rica.jpg)

(http://www.korps-politie-suriname.com/nieuws/nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/archief%20nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/2007/2007-09-nieuwsbronnen-internationaal/cms_visual_993.jpg)

(http://www.korps-politie-suriname.com/nieuws/nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/archief%20nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/2007/2007-09-nieuwsbronnen-internationaal/heroine.jpg)


you can even get yourself a gun
(http://www.korps-politie-suriname.com/nieuws/nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/archief%20nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/2007/2007-09-nieuwsbronnen-internationaal/09-06-politie-inval.jpg)

or 2
(http://www.korps-politie-suriname.com/nieuws/nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/archief%20nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/2007/2007-09-nieuwsbronnen-internationaal/09-03-politie-wapens.jpg)

and head out to take in some of the local wildlife
(http://www.korps-politie-suriname.com/nieuws/nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/archief%20nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/2007/2007-09-nieuwsbronnen-internationaal/verwaarloosde%20hond.jpg)


Once back at your room
(http://www.korps-politie-suriname.com/nieuws/nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/archief%20nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/2007/2007-09-nieuwsbronnen-internationaal/09-21-brand.jpg)

enjoy the wonderful view of the streets below
(http://www.korps-politie-suriname.com/nieuws/nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/archief%20nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/2007/2007-09-nieuwsbronnen-internationaal/van%20kleef.jpg)

(just be careful who you talk to)
(http://www.korps-politie-suriname.com/nieuws/nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/archief%20nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/2007/2007-09-nieuwsbronnen-internationaal/heyyou.jpg)


our top notch law enforcement will ensure you a safe stay
(http://www.korps-politie-suriname.com/nieuws/nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/archief%20nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/2007/2007-09-nieuwsbronnen-internationaal/soerka.jpg)

thanks for comming and have a safe journey home
(http://www.korps-politie-suriname.com/nieuws/nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/archief%20nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/2007/2007-09-nieuwsbronnen-internationaal/09-07-marine-sar-hulp.jpg)

(http://www.korps-politie-suriname.com/nieuws/nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/archief%20nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/2007/2007-09-nieuwsbronnen-internationaal/cohen.jpg)
 

LMAO.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on December 01, 2007, 03:13:51 PM
Posted by Glenda at RU:

Glenda Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 2:06 pm   
Beth spends 6 hours with OM

Word on the street, she was being questioned for six hours. Dave and JQK also there. 


English translation:  Hans Mos spent 6 hours with Beth, Dave and JQK going over the case against JK2 & P
LOL!
I like this translation.
;)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Observer on December 01, 2007, 03:14:03 PM
That picture of the dog really offends me and makes me angry. But I guess it's no different than how Aruba treats Tourists who are victims of a crime.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Observer on December 01, 2007, 03:16:41 PM
Challenge to Simian!!  Yoo hoo!  Answer me this....just once, please.

Simian Says: June 22nd, 2005 at 4:56 pm
The 5th suspect has an alibi so strong that he has everybody baffled.



Who is the 5th suspect???  Email me at cindoal@yahoo.com.  If you are still around and have the guts to spit it out this time...email me...I want to know.

There ya go Lala!! I hope he has the balls to write ya back  :D


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Altruist on December 01, 2007, 03:17:41 PM
O/T Stacy Peterson case.
Am I losing my mind or my hearing?  I thought Mark Furhman started his report by saying that 2 men entered the donut shop, sat down at the table and neither one left the table until they both got up and walked out.  Later, he changed his story to say that there is a part of the tape where there is one man sitting at the table.   Did anyone hear the same thing?   


Yes I heard that.  Then Greta specifically asked him if one got up and walked away and he said yes.

Hi there, have just started reading & wanted to address this in case nobody else caught the whole segment:

According to Furnham Peterson's stepbrother said that Peterson did a weird thing while they were both at the coffee shop.  Peterson took his cell phone out & placed it on the table, told the stepbrother not to answer the phone & then Peterson left the coffee shop.  While the stepbrother was sitting there alone at the table in the coffee shop, Peterson's cell phone rang & when the stepbrother looked at it on the display was Stacy's name & #.  Then Peterson returned to the coffee shop & they left together the coffee shop after 9 PM. 

Today I heard a blurp that they then went to Peterson's house & removed a blue container from Peterson's residence that Peterson paid his stepbrother to help him do.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 01, 2007, 03:20:02 PM
Challenge to Simian!!  Yoo hoo!  Answer me this....just once, please.

Simian Says: June 22nd, 2005 at 4:56 pm
The 5th suspect has an alibi so strong that he has everybody baffled.



Who is the 5th suspect???  Email me at cindoal@yahoo.com.  If you are still around and have the guts to spit it out this time...email me...I want to know.

There ya go Lala!! I hope he has the balls to write ya back  :D
"She...."


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 01, 2007, 03:20:27 PM
Challenge to Simian!!  Yoo hoo!  Answer me this....just once, please.

Simian Says: June 22nd, 2005 at 4:56 pm
The 5th suspect has an alibi so strong that he has everybody baffled.



Who is the 5th suspect???  Email me at cindoal@yahoo.com.  If you are still around and have the guts to spit it out this time...email me...I want to know.

There ya go Lala!! I hope he has the balls to write ya back  :D

If he is who I think...he can do this and no one will be the wiser. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: MuffyBee on December 01, 2007, 03:21:09 PM
O/T Stacy Peterson case.
Am I losing my mind or my hearing?  I thought Mark Furhman started his report by saying that 2 men entered the donut shop, sat down at the table and neither one left the table until they both got up and walked out.  Later, he changed his story to say that there is a part of the tape where there is one man sitting at the table.   Did anyone hear the same thing?   


Yes I heard that.  Then Greta specifically asked him if one got up and walked away and he said yes.

Hi there, have just started reading & wanted to address this in case nobody else caught the whole segment:

According to Furnham Peterson's stepbrother said that Peterson did a weird thing while they were both at the coffee shop.  Peterson took his cell phone out & placed it on the table, told the stepbrother not to answer the phone & then Peterson left the coffee shop.  While the stepbrother was sitting there alone at the table in the coffee shop, Peterson's cell phone rang & when the stepbrother looked at it on the display was Stacy's name & #.  Then Peterson returned to the coffee shop & they left together the coffee shop after 9 PM. 

Today I heard a blurp that they then went to Peterson's house & removed a blue container from Peterson's residence that Peterson paid his stepbrother to help him do.

We are on the Natalee Holloway thread, but I will briefly answer.  Peterson could have just left the phone in a shirt or jacket on SILENT and told the stepbrother he would be right back.  Then, there would be none of the "don't answer" thing to call to question.  That's just weird, imo.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 01, 2007, 03:22:21 PM
That picture of the dog really offends me and makes me angry. But I guses it's no different than how Aruba treats Tourists who are victims.


That is horrible!! I agree...I :smt022 when I first saw it at the site
But BLAH.....that was a very funny post!!!!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: wreck on December 01, 2007, 03:23:06 PM
That picture of the dog really offends me and makes me angry. But I guess it's no different than how Aruba treats Tourists who are victims of a crime.
That picture of the dog SICKENS me to no end!! (but, I spit out my coffee when I saw the caption: "check out our wildlife")


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: blah on December 01, 2007, 03:26:58 PM
That picture of the dog really offends me and makes me angry. But I guses it's no different than how Aruba treats Tourists who are victims.


That is horrible!! I agree...I :smt022 when I first saw it at the site
But BLAH.....that was a very funny post!!!!!!!

the truth of that island is horrible and I think the picture of that dog really shows it.  Not meant to offend anyone, just show the reality of that dump


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: MuffyBee on December 01, 2007, 03:30:32 PM
I hadn't seen this discussed before.  Do you know by whom and when it was made?

http://judicial-inc.biz/Joran_va_der_sloot.htm


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: blah on December 01, 2007, 03:34:42 PM
I hadn't seen this discussed before.  Do you know by whom and when it was made?

http://judicial-inc.biz/Joran_va_der_sloot.htm

I think tht has been around quite a while.  I remember discussion a long time ago about how that photo of the sloots house is photoshopped big time.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: MuffyBee on December 01, 2007, 03:37:00 PM
I hadn't seen this discussed before.  Do you know by whom and when it was made?

http://judicial-inc.biz/Joran_va_der_sloot.htm

I think tht has been around quite a while.  I remember discussion a long time ago about how that photo of the sloots house is photoshopped big time.

Thanks.  Now I remember, because of the sloot house being photoshopped.  I guess that photo of Deepak hanging kinda grabbed me.  I was just going through stuff on the internet...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Observer on December 01, 2007, 03:37:02 PM
That picture of the dog really offends me and makes me angry. But I guses it's no different than how Aruba treats Tourists who are victims.


That is horrible!! I agree...I :smt022 when I first saw it at the site
But BLAH.....that was a very funny post!!!!!!!

the truth of that island is horrible and I think the picture of that dog really shows it.  Not meant to offend anyone, just show the reality of that dump

So many dogs roam free in Aruba that I am sure they were able to pick and choose when they slaughtered one of them to saturate that mattress with dogs blood. Thats speculation on my part that it was part of the case but I can only imagine the horrible and dispicable acts of people involved that we dont know about yet.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: MuffyBee on December 01, 2007, 03:42:12 PM
That picture of the dog really offends me and makes me angry. But I guses it's no different than how Aruba treats Tourists who are victims.


That is horrible!! I agree...I :smt022 when I first saw it at the site
But BLAH.....that was a very funny post!!!!!!!

the truth of that island is horrible and I think the picture of that dog really shows it.  Not meant to offend anyone, just show the reality of that dump

So many dogs roam free in Aruba that I am sure they were able to pick and choose when they slaughtered one of them to saturate that mattress with dogs blood. Thats speculation on my part that it was part of the case but I can only imagine the horrible acts of people involved that we dont know about yet.

That poor dog looked like what some call a "potcake". 
What is a Potcake?

    pot'-cake, noun: an island dog deriving its name from eating the cake (grits or rice) left in the bottom of the pot

I had first heard that term used when I was visiting islands in the Bahamas in the early 1980's.  There is actually a rescue group:
www.potcakefoundation.com/pg1.html  to try to help the mixed breed dogs.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 01, 2007, 03:47:50 PM
That picture of the dog really offends me and makes me angry. But I guses it's no different than how Aruba treats Tourists who are victims.


That is horrible!! I agree...I :smt022 when I first saw it at the site
But BLAH.....that was a very funny post!!!!!!!

the truth of that island is horrible and I think the picture of that dog really shows it.  Not meant to offend anyone, just show the reality of that dump

So many dogs roam free in Aruba that I am sure they were able to pick and choose when they slaughtered one of them to saturate that mattress with dogs blood. Thats speculation on my part that it was part of the case but I can only imagine the horrible acts of people involved that we dont know about yet.

That poor dog looked like what some call a "potcake". 
What is a Potcake?

    pot'-cake, noun: an island dog deriving its name from eating the cake (grits or rice) left in the bottom of the pot

I had first heard that term used when I was visiting islands in the Bahamas in the early 1980's.  There is actually a rescue group:
www.potcakefoundation.com/pg1.html  to try to help the mixed breed dogs.

It looks like the rescue group has not reached suriname, aruba, et al.  I would much prefer a dog be put to sleep than suffering this plight.  This is horrendous and indicative of third-world behavior.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Frank on December 01, 2007, 03:49:55 PM
Dennis Jacobs is a dog trainer and judge. He married a woman from Michigan and travels the Carribbean with "discipline" dogs, whatever that means.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Observer on December 01, 2007, 03:56:32 PM
Rudy is FOS!! He knows exactly why this case was not solved in the first week! He just wants to retire and for the case to close so his part of the cover up is never revealed.

(http://img138.imageshack.us/img138/390/rudyza2.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)

Bon Dia Papi Translation 12/01/07

come across have to come one finalisacion at the caso holloway more soon cu is posible saturday, 01 december 2007 image

oranjestad - the caso of natalee holloway is in full speed again y the cobertura international for difama the name of the island here, enves of go behind the hechonan regal, is at ordo of day again, this everybody can see for they self, hour is deal of the coberturanan of paisnan as merca spesificamente.

good morning aruba owing to aserca minister of husticia sr. rudy croes on the sharp here y the la tell cu hour the la wordo informa cu the detencionnan of the hobennan here is go cai again, the la place hand at his curason, for thing is go sosode, comokiera cu aruba will go achieve more damage still. the form con the medionan of comunicacion mericano in one form devastador owing to end cu aruba, was much lamentable. minister rudy croes owing to tell cu always was they desire for have claridad in the caso here. aruba owing to even invita investigadornan mericano, owing to invita investigadornan dutch y of all part of world they owing to come give aruba one hand, but not owing to achieve claridad in the caso here still. the mandatario owing to tell cu have some evidencia new, cu the mandatario owing to tell cu is stay investiga profundamente y is wait for cu now if will achieve claridad on the caso here. not can is so cu one person is come aruba y happen his vacacionnan y diripiente nignun person know more of dje y where the is, that is why the mandatario is believe cu have to come one solucion in the caso here comokiera cu not can is so cu none person know where the person here is.

 the mandatario owing to tell cu for first cu 31 of december have to have one claridad on the caso here y kico exactly owing to happen in the caso here, cu practicamente do not mirando one solucion. the mandatario owing to tell cu mucho more the not can give in the caso here comokiera cu the not have mucho detaye more of thing is pasando in the caso here, but if the looking at cu is tratando of all form for arrive at one finalisacion of the caso here more soon cu is posible.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 01, 2007, 04:04:21 PM
http://www.amigoe.com/artman/publish/artikel_37353.php

Ouders Holloway in gesprek met OM
30 Nov, 2007, 19:23 (GMT -04:00)

 
   
  ORANJESTAD — Het Openbaar Ministerie is ingegaan op het verzoek van de ouders van Natalee Holloway, Dave Holloway en Beth Reynolds (Twitty), om een gesprek. Zaterdag praten zij op Aruba met de hoofdofficier van justitie, Hans Mos, over de laatste ontwikkelingen in de verdwijningzaak van hun dochter, van wie wordt aangenomen dat ze dood is.

Beth Reynolds – die gescheiden is van Holloway en later ook van Jug Twitty – heeft lange tijd gewacht op het moment om een onderhoud met justitie te hebben. Twee jaar geleden zou de toenmalige hoofdofficier Karin Janssen, die terugkeerde naar Nederland, daar geen trek in hebben gehad.

Volgens het OM is er gekozen om deze keer zo open mogelijk te zijn over het hernieuwde onderzoek, waarbij de drie verdachten – Joran van der Sloot en de broers Deepak en Satish Kalpoe – wegens vermeende mishandeling en doodslag van Natalee Holloway, wederom zijn vastgezet. “We zijn een Openbaar Ministerie”, reageert hoofdofficier Hans Mos met de nadruk op ‘openbaar’. “We willen ook rekening houden met de gevoelens van slachtoffers en zijn niet alleen bezig met de waarheidsvinding. Maar ook de samenleving moet zo goed mogelijk op de hoogte worden gehouden, vanwege de grote impact van deze zaak. Hoe het er twee jaar geleden aan toe ging met het verstrekken informatie was desastreus voor Aruba. We gaan geen verstoppertje spelen en vertellen wat we kunnen.”

Beth en Dave komen allebei in de loop van vandaag aan. Ze zouden bereid zijn om de informatie die ze separaat vergaarden bij elkaar te voegen.


Through translator:

Parents Holloway in conversation with Public Prosecution Service
30 Nov, 2007, 19.23 (GMT -04:00)

ORANJESTAD - the Public Prosecution Service has discussed the request of the parents of Natalee Holloway, Dave Holloway and Beth Reynolds (Twitty), for a conversation. Saturday talk they on Aruba with the chief public prosecutor, Hans mos, concerning the last developments in the disappearance matter of their for the, of he who it is adopted that she is dead. Beth Reynolds - which have separated of Holloway and later also of Jug Twitty - have to have waited for a long time at the moment a maintenance with justice. Two years suffered the then head officier Karin Janssen, who returned to the Netherlands, in this no appetite have had. According to Public Prosecution Service it has been chosen there for this time this way open possible be concerning the renewed research, where suspected three - Joran of of the ditch and the brothers Deepak and Satish Kalpoe - because of alleged maltreatment and doodslag of Natalee Holloway, has been again fixed. "we are a Public Prosecution Service", react head officier Hans mos with the emphasis to ` in public. We want also take into account the feelings of victims and are not only busy truth astuteness. But also the society must be kept as well as possible informed, because of the large impact of this matter. How the years there two went suffered from with supplying information were desastreus for Aruba. We will play no verstoppertje and tell what we can. Beth and Dave arrive both in the course of today. They would be prepared the information which they gathered separate at each other to join.
 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 01, 2007, 04:06:51 PM
http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2007-12-01-holloway-suspects_N.htm

December 1, 2007

1 suspect in Holloway case released from jail
Posted 59m ago
 

ORANJESTAD, Aruba (AP) — One of two brothers charged in the disappearance of American teenager Natalee Holloway was seen leaving the prison Saturday afternoon after a judge ruled the evidence wasn't strong enough to keep holding them.
Sateesh Kalpoe walked out and was accompanied by his attorney and an unidentified woman, according to an Associated Press photographer who observed them leave.

His brother, Deepak Kalpoe, was expected to be released shortly, his attorney, Hose Figaroa, said. Both have denied having any role in Holloway's disappearance.

A third suspect, Joran van der Sloot, remains in jail. He and the two brothers were the last known people to see Holloway alive before she vanished on May 30, 2005, hours before she was scheduled to return home to Alabama with fellow high school classmates celebrating their graduation.

The three men were re-arrested on Nov. 21 on suspicion of involvement in Holloway's death. Authorities said they had "new incriminating evidence," but defense attorneys complained that the new material amounted to little more than misunderstandings in the suspects' recorded conversations.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 01, 2007, 04:12:18 PM
 ******* quote>>>

Rudy is FOS!! He knows exactly why this case was not solved in the first week! He just wants to retire and for the case to close so his part of the cover up is never revealed.

Shango says...
The rule of the Arawak King is the Final word.

DirtyHand has fouled the air for all nearby, but the Arawak Nation will claim Babylonian Authority prevents them from hunting Lions, and DirtyHand.

But the Arawak king controls destiny of all. The Arawak king has DirtyHands and DirtyFeet. If he is to reign anew, he cannot be soiled more.

The babylonians have ruled the Arawak Nation through deception and stealth, and their charges, the Arawaks, speak now with the same forked tongue, on behalf of their king.

The gift the cowboys ask of the king of the Arawak Nation is a mere trifle.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: JusticeforNatalee on December 01, 2007, 04:29:41 PM
Words of Hope from FrontPage Poster Elisabeth (Netherlands)

"May be things are not as bad as you all think. Custody was asked for in order to be able to work on the new evidence without interference of the suspects. It is not a part of the sentence. Stopping custody does not predict that this will not go to court"


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 01, 2007, 04:30:27 PM
Rudy is FOS!! He knows exactly why this case was not solved in the first week! He just wants to retire and for the case to close so his part of the cover up is never revealed.

(http://img138.imageshack.us/img138/390/rudyza2.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)



Maybe the "existing" information which Hans Mos is referring to ... "existing" information which has been reexamined ... has a connection to the media release made by Rudy Croes' spokesperson on June 10, 2005 ... the media release that stated that the eighteen year old American citizen from Alabama was confirmed dead and ... the location of her body was known.

Janet

++++++++++++++++++


Spokesperson for Rudy Croes
FOX NEWS
June 11, 2005


David Cruz, a spokesman for the Aruban Minister of Justice told FOX News Natalee Holloway , who was on vacation with friends with a graduation trip when she disappeared, was confirmed dead and that authorities knew the location of her body.


http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/americas/11/30/aruba.holloway/index.html

Hans Mos
CNN
November 30, 2007


Mos has told CNN he believes authorities have enough evidence to prove Holloway is dead, even if her body is never found. He has suggested her death was an accident.

The new evidence against the three men was gathered from advanced techniques used to re-examine existing information, including cell phone records and text messages exchanged the night Holloway disappeared, Mos has said.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 01, 2007, 04:43:34 PM
http://www.pr-inside.com/suspects-in-natalee-holloway-case-r327306.htm


2 suspects in Natalee Holloway case released from jail  
© AP
2007-12-01 22:18:23 -

ORANJESTAD, Aruba (AP) - Two Surinamese brothers re-arrested last week in the disappearance of U.S. teenager Natalee Holloway walked out of jail Saturday after a judge ruled the evidence wasn't strong enough to keep holding them.

Deepak Kalpoe, 24, left the lockup in the afternoon and got into a car with one of his attorneys.

His 21-year-old brother Satish, who was released earlier, declined to speak to reporters when his attorneys dropped him off at his house.

A third suspect, Joran van der Sloot, remains in jail. He and the two brothers were the last known people to see Holloway before she vanished more than two years ago, hours before she was scheduled to return home to Alabama with fellow high school classmates celebrating their graduation.

All three have denied any role in the disappearance of the 18-year-old from Mountain Brook, Alabama, who has not been seen since she left a bar with the suspects May 30, 2005.

No trace of Holloway has been found despite extensive searches, and prosecutors say they have evidence that she is dead.

The three suspects were re-arrested Nov. 21 on suspicion of involvement in Holloway's death, and authorities spoke of «new incriminating evidence» suggesting the men were involved in covering up a crime or disposing of a corpse.


But defense attorneys complained that the new material was little more than misunderstandings in the suspects' recorded conversations and did not warrant holding them.

On Friday a judge agreed, and ordered the Kalpoes released.

Aruba chief prosecutor Hans Mos called the decision a setback, but said the investigation will proceed.

«We had hoped for a longer period to confront these suspects with the material we have against them,» he said. «We were not finished with that yet. But this is the way the law says it has to go.  


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: mrs. red on December 01, 2007, 04:51:33 PM
Words of Hope from FrontPage Poster Elisabeth (Netherlands)

"May be things are not as bad as you all think. Custody was asked for in order to be able to work on the new evidence without interference of the suspects. It is not a part of the sentence. Stopping custody does not predict that this will not go to court"


I wanted to say this last night when i was lurking... but it's true. Even in this country a lot of time they will re-arrest suspects and then let them out to hang themselves so to speak... it in no way has any bearing on guilt or innocence.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 01, 2007, 04:53:33 PM
Words of Hope from FrontPage Poster Elisabeth (Netherlands)

"May be things are not as bad as you all think. Custody was asked for in order to be able to work on the new evidence without interference of the suspects. It is not a part of the sentence. Stopping custody does not predict that this will not go to court"


I hope and I believe this is correct.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: mrs. red on December 01, 2007, 04:55:23 PM
O/T... Tyler will you hit the musing thread and answer a garden question for me before you head out (when you do... not that I am saying to ...)




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Port Valerie on December 01, 2007, 04:56:31 PM
Words of Hope from FrontPage Poster Elisabeth (Netherlands)

"May be things are not as bad as you all think. Custody was asked for in order to be able to work on the new evidence without interference of the suspects. It is not a part of the sentence. Stopping custody does not predict that this will not go to court"


Thank you.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2007, 05:05:07 PM
I am very gratified and heartened to hear that Hans Mos spent six hours with Dave, Beth and JQK.

This alone tells me this is a new ball game.  Compare and contrast to Karin Janssen who threatened Jug and would not talk to them.  Remember she is the one who said cleaning fluid and chocolate and stuff like that as well.

Posters who come here only to post and tell us how wrong we are can spare themselves the effort.  Most of us don't care what anybody else thinks of our concerns and actions taken in this regard.  We operate from a love of justice that goes to our very core and nothing anyone says is going to change that one bit.

I am not here to appease anybody let alone other posters.  I am here to follow the developments in this investigation and to glean what information I can from them to try to discern what happened to Natalee Holloway.  We are each entitled to our opinions in regard to the investigation but not the motives or intelligence of others.  Stuff that!  I want justice for her and answers for her family as well.  Every human being deserves that.  We do what we can.

MO

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: AnnieMW1 on December 01, 2007, 05:17:21 PM
Posted by Glenda at RU:

Glenda Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 2:06 pm   
Beth spends 6 hours with OM

Word on the street, she was being questioned for six hours. Dave and JQK also there. 


English translation:  Hans Mos spent 6 hours with Beth, Dave and JQK going over the case against JK2 & P

I really have never gotten into bashing "the dark side" - just not worth my time and energy and I don't care what their opinions are.  BUT...this is perhaps the stupidest insinuation I have ever seen...that Beth was somehow summoned down here and questioned - instead of wanting to meet with the prosecutor after ALL THIS TIME to provide all of her insights, facts, data, theories, etc. to the prosecutor.  Ridiculous.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 01, 2007, 05:20:57 PM
Mrs. Red, I must be sight-challenged.  I could not find it.  How about just shooting me an e-mail and I will be happy to oblige, if I can.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: AnnieMW1 on December 01, 2007, 05:21:38 PM
That picture of the dog really offends me and makes me angry. But I guses it's no different than how Aruba treats Tourists who are victims.


That is horrible!! I agree...I :smt022 when I first saw it at the site
But BLAH.....that was a very funny post!!!!!!!

the truth of that island is horrible and I think the picture of that dog really shows it.  Not meant to offend anyone, just show the reality of that dump

So agree with these posts.  Guess nobody can find a place in their heart to give this poor dog a meal.  Disgusting.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2007, 05:25:25 PM
I can't look at hungry dogs at all.  It makes me go feed my own more and they are already fat!!! 

This goes to the quality of their mercy as a society and speaks volumes.  It explains the lack of compassion for Beth and lack of concern for finding the truth.  I am sure those resorts throw away more than enough food to feed every dog on that stinking island ten times over.  Just no one cares enough to make it happen, etc.

One in five uses cocaine according to our Dept of Justice stats.  Guess that dulls the finer senses like mercy and compassion.

MO only.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: mrs. red on December 01, 2007, 05:27:26 PM
Emily Latella said "Who is Gizzard and why are chicken entrails so interested in making negative comments on the Natalee Holloway thread?"

That's funny.... I am really not in the mood to be nice, so I am going to leave my opinion at "WHAT TYLER SAID".

I really could care two rat's asses about what any nay sayer says, after 2.5 years I have seen so many people do so many stupid things that nothing surprises me anymore... as for not believing or having hope... that's nothing more than sad. Glad it's not my life.... and I say...

KEEP THE FAITH MONKEYS!   haven't you ever noticed that's like t.v. the longer that they howl about something... the more wrong they are... like elections, etc.  what ppl think... etc.  I saw a marketing report the other day that said if you repeat anything long enough, ppl will believe you.... so believe this

Justice eventually prevails and what goes around comes around...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: mrs. red on December 01, 2007, 05:32:58 PM
Mrs. Red, I must be sight-challenged.  I could not find it.  How about just shooting me an e-mail and I will be happy to oblige, if I can.
\


I said that and then in my typical ADD fashion wandered into other threads, reading back... it's posted there now...

and I will email.. sorry :sad: I was kreading what Wizard said and the Baby Grace thread...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2007, 05:34:15 PM
I would LOVE to have been a fly on the wall for the Holloway's discussion with MOS.  THAT is where the information was exchanged or shared. 

Bet Beth is feeling a lot better as well as Dave, just knowing for a fact that they do not have to go to sleep every night wondering if their child could be alive in dire straits of some sort will be a relief of the very saddest, most heartbreaking nature.

But out of curiosity, I would love to now what Mos told them.  He said he hoped he could explain and his English is excellent so it means he is trying to convey something sort of complicated.

It also means he has the goods on the suspects.  Seems it was much simpler than we may have thought.

Just information as to what happened is a start.  They should tell what they did with her and tell it NOW with that ship looking.  NOW is the time to divulge so it can be used to maximum advantage.  There is a very high rate of confession in the Dutch system, one of the reason they are so concerned with mercy for the perpetrators of crime.  Good for them, I am totally lacking in it myself and want the book thrown at them.

But the decent thing to do would be tell where she is NOW while that ship is looking.  But when have we ever seen anybody other than Mos doing the decent thing in this tragedy.

My rant of the day.  Rest of my time will be spent annoying Blah.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 01, 2007, 05:37:15 PM
I can't look at hungry dogs at all.  It makes me go feed my own more and they are already fat!!! 

This goes to the quality of their mercy as a society and speaks volumes.  It explains the lack of compassion for Beth and lack of concern for finding the truth.  I am sure those resorts throw away more than enough food to feed every dog on that stinking island ten times over.  Just no one cares enough to make it happen, etc.

One in five uses cocaine according to our Dept of Justice stats.  Guess that dulls the finer senses like mercy and compassion.

MO only.

Not to belittle your comments in any way...but the words mercy and compassion used in conjunction with Aruba...well you understand. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: mrs. red on December 01, 2007, 05:42:33 PM
back to chores... bbl !!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Observer on December 01, 2007, 05:48:43 PM
(http://img519.imageshack.us/img519/7058/120107kalpoedeepak1fd0.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)

Suspect in Natalee Holloway Disappearance Freed (Foxnews.com)
Deepak Kalpoe walks out of an Aruban jail after judge decides evidence against him not strong enough.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 01, 2007, 05:51:18 PM
 :lol: :lol: :lol:
These people really need to stop reading into things what isn't there  :lol:

Posted by Heli at RU - a partial transcript of Red's call into Dana Pretzer last night:

RED issues a formal threat to Aruba live on Radio

From the Dana Pretzer Show
November 30, 2007

Red:

" ... All I can say to Aruba, and you better damn well listen, very few times Mr. Prosecutor and all of the government officials, do you get a
second chance to make a first impression and you guys have an
opportunity right now to do that and that's afforded to very few people.

You screw up this time folks and trust me, you thought it was bad what
everyone has done to you before, wait until you get a hold of what we're
going to do to you if you screw this family around like it seems like you're
doing
. You want to go on the air and you want to make, you know this
case has gone on far too long for people to (inaudible) this kind of bullshit that a mother flies down there and has to hear that the suspects were released before she even touches down and the prosecutor is supposed to talk to the family after this has happened?

For the love of God, just tell the truth. Are these people incapable of just telling it as it is? If you are incapable of it, no one ever need go to that
island.

RU comments after the post:

Quote from: Heli
One of you who can preserve this audio, I wish you would do it as I
suspect this particular Pretzer Show and Red's threats will be removed
sooner than later.

Someone might just be interested in hearing these threats.

Quote from: HannieC
This falls IMO under a 'terroristic threat'.....my my..... 8)

Quote from: padpradasha
Good bye Red.  Hope you enjoy prison food.  Should be a knock at your door real soon for uttering terroristic threats.  :lol:

Quote from: padpradasha
https://tips.fbi.gov/ (https://tips.fbi.gov/)

Quote from: Heli
I'm not one who gets bent out of shape by whack jobs who flap their
lips but THIS direct threat to Aruba by Red has crossed the line.  He
isn't just commenting, he's addressing himself directly to them and
the threats he's made are outrageous.

Somebody please save the audio and have it turned over to whoever
it's appropraite.  He's addressing directly the Prosecutor and government
officials, so I'd say that's where his threats should go.


My comment:  Could someone explain to me how threatening to spread the word of the Boycott is FBI threat worthy?   :lol: :lol:  What a bunch of buffoons they are!  :lol: :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 01, 2007, 05:57:51 PM
'terroristic threat' ....???  :smt017 (terroristic, lmao)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 01, 2007, 06:02:11 PM
:lol: :lol: :lol:
These people really need to stop reading into things what isn't there  :lol:

Posted by Heli at RU - a partial transcript of Red's call into Dana Pretzer last night:

RED issues a formal threat to Aruba live on Radio

From the Dana Pretzer Show
November 30, 2007

Red:

" ... All I can say to Aruba, and you better damn well listen, very few times Mr. Prosecutor and all of the government officials, do you get a
second chance to make a first impression and you guys have an
opportunity right now to do that and that's afforded to very few people.

You screw up this time folks and trust me, you thought it was bad what
everyone has done to you before, wait until you get a hold of what we're
going to do to you if you screw this family around like it seems like you're
doing
. You want to go on the air and you want to make, you know this
case has gone on far too long for people to (inaudible) this kind of bullshit that a mother flies down there and has to hear that the suspects were released before she even touches down and the prosecutor is supposed to talk to the family after this has happened?

For the love of God, just tell the truth. Are these people incapable of just telling it as it is? If you are incapable of it, no one ever need go to that
island.

RU comments after the post:

Quote from: Heli
One of you who can preserve this audio, I wish you would do it as I
suspect this particular Pretzer Show and Red's threats will be removed
sooner than later.

Someone might just be interested in hearing these threats.

Quote from: HannieC
This falls IMO under a 'terroristic threat'.....my my..... 8)

Quote from: padpradasha
Good bye Red.  Hope you enjoy prison food.  Should be a knock at your door real soon for uttering terroristic threats.  :lol:

Quote from: padpradasha
https://tips.fbi.gov/ (https://tips.fbi.gov/)

Quote from: Heli
I'm not one who gets bent out of shape by whack jobs who flap their
lips but THIS direct threat to Aruba by Red has crossed the line.  He
isn't just commenting, he's addressing himself directly to them and
the threats he's made are outrageous.

Somebody please save the audio and have it turned over to whoever
it's appropraite.  He's addressing directly the Prosecutor and government
officials, so I'd say that's where his threats should go.


My comment:  Could someone explain to me how threatening to spread the word of the Boycott is FBI threat worthy?   :lol: :lol:  What a bunch of buffoons they are!  :lol: :lol:


More hallucinating from a bunch of Bellview Romper Room residents, who have posted the most blatant lies and threats to Beth, Jug, Dave and even the short time Robin posted there, the kids at Mountain Brook and one of their moderators even threated a marine and his girlfriend and wanted them to meet so they could "beat them up," and the threats regards Condi Rice.....this is just beyond the pale what a mentally challenged group can dream up when left unattended.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 01, 2007, 06:02:48 PM
Posted by Glenda at RU:

Glenda Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 2:06 pm   
Beth spends 6 hours with OM

Word on the street, she was being questioned for six hours. Dave and JQK also there. 


English translation:  Hans Mos spent 6 hours with Beth, Dave and JQK going over the case against JK2 & P

I really have never gotten into bashing "the dark side" - just not worth my time and energy and I don't care what their opinions are.  BUT...this is perhaps the stupidest insinuation I have ever seen...that Beth was somehow summoned down here and questioned  - instead of wanting to meet with the prosecutor after ALL THIS TIME to provide all of her insights, facts, data, theories, etc. to the prosecutor.  Ridiculous.

Anna ... I agree.

Prior to the Judge's ruling which released Deepak and Satish ... Beth stated that it was "she" that was going to ask Hans Mos questions  as well as share information she and Dave had gathered.  Beth conveyed nothing about her being questioned.  Hans Mos in his media address did not imply that Natalee's parents were going to be questioned.

Janet

+++++++++++++++


http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/americas/11/29/aruba.holloway/?iref=mpstoryview

November 29, 2007

Natalee Holloway's parents to meet with Aruban prosecutor

Natalee Holloway's mother said she has hope that Mos will be able to solve the case.

"He seems great. The case seems to be handled well. I'm going to ask him some long-awaited questions," she said.

The family is encouraged that the meeting will take place, Holloway attorney John Kelly told CNN. Two years ago, the previous chief prosecutor -- who has since returned to the Netherlands -- would not sit down with them.

Kelly said Beth Holloway and her ex-husband, Dave, want to share information they've gathered since their daughter disappeared in May 2005 while on vacation with about 100 classmates.

Neither he nor Beth Holloway would provide details.


http://beta.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/americas/11/30/aruba.holloway/index.html?iref=topnews

November 30, 2007

Brothers to be freed in Natalee Holloway case

Holloway's parents are expected to meet with Mos on Saturday. The prosecutor said he will explain to them what happened, "if I can explain it. I hope I can."


 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 01, 2007, 06:03:54 PM
(http://img519.imageshack.us/img519/7058/120107kalpoedeepak1fd0.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)

Suspect in Natalee Holloway Disappearance Freed (Foxnews.com)
Deepak Kalpoe walks out of an Aruban jail after judge decides evidence against him not strong enough.

You would have thought Deepak would have some new luggage for his visit to California when he wins that $800,000,000 from Dr. Phil. :idea:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 01, 2007, 06:04:17 PM
To keep track of the weather on the TES Sea Voyage...here are 2 links

http://weather.org/caribbean.htm

http://www.orbit.nesdis.noaa.gov/smcd/opdb/aviation/loops/realtime/atlir_loope.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 01, 2007, 06:04:17 PM
Deepak leaving the jail today.  Someone at RU said, look how happy Deepak looks???
Happy?  He looks scared and wondering if he was safer in jail, IMO.


(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/dk120107.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 01, 2007, 06:07:44 PM
HELI: 
I'm not one who gets bent out of shape by whack jobs who flap their
lips but THIS direct threat to Aruba by Red has crossed the line.  He
isn't just commenting, he's addressing himself directly to them and
the threats he's made are outrageous.


It is hard to bend someone who has already become so contorted from twisting the truth.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: MuffyBee on December 01, 2007, 06:12:37 PM
'terroristic threat' ....???  :smt017 (terroristic, lmao)

Emily Latella said "Teriyaki Sweat?"  Why in the world would anybody sweat teriyaki?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: MuffyBee on December 01, 2007, 06:15:32 PM
(http://img519.imageshack.us/img519/7058/120107kalpoedeepak1fd0.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)

Suspect in Natalee Holloway Disappearance Freed (Foxnews.com)
Deepak Kalpoe walks out of an Aruban jail after judge decides evidence against him not strong enough.

You would have thought Deepak would have some new luggage for his visit to California when he wins that $800,000,000 from Dr. Phil. :idea:

Deepak has been caught by the fashion police.  He's carrying white before Memorial Day :shock: And he does have other "luggage", because I had thought he was carrying the Black, genuine vinyl set last time....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 01, 2007, 06:15:35 PM
HELI: 
I'm not one who gets bent out of shape by whack jobs who flap their
lips but THIS direct threat to Aruba by Red has crossed the line.  He
isn't just commenting, he's addressing himself directly to them and
the threats he's made are outrageous.


It is hard to bend someone who has already become so contorted from twisting the truth.

This is a terrorist threat:  Al-Qaeda has issued a taped message that an attack on the USA is imminent.

This is not a terrorist threat:   If you don't stop messing with Natalee Holloway's family I'll tell everyone I know not to go to Aruba.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Blue Moon on December 01, 2007, 06:16:00 PM
Deepak leaving the jail today.  Someone at RU said, look how happy Deepak looks???
Happy?  He looks scared and wondering if he was safer in jail, IMO.




Doesn't look like his was given protection upon leaving.  I would be scared if I was him also.  I bet he cannot sleep at night for thinking they ARE coming after him. :P :P :P


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: MuffyBee on December 01, 2007, 06:16:35 PM
HELI: 
I'm not one who gets bent out of shape by whack jobs who flap their
lips but THIS direct threat to Aruba by Red has crossed the line.  He
isn't just commenting, he's addressing himself directly to them and
the threats he's made are outrageous.


It is hard to bend someone who has already become so contorted from twisting the truth.

This is a terrorist threat:  Al-Qaeda has issued a taped message that an attack on the USA is imminent.

This is not a terrorist threat:   If you don't stop messing with Natalee Holloway's family I'll tell everyone I know not to go to Aruba.


 :thumleft: 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: MuffyBee on December 01, 2007, 06:18:15 PM
Deepak leaving the jail today.  Someone at RU said, look how happy Deepak looks???
Happy?  He looks scared and wondering if he was safer in jail, IMO.




Doesn't look like his was given protection upon leaving.  I would be scared if I was him also.  I bet he cannot sleep at night for thinking they ARE coming after him. :P :P :P

He doesn't look happy.  Look at his body language.  Look at his face.  Nope.  Doesn't look happy to me.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Katysmom on December 01, 2007, 06:18:52 PM
Heli: "Somebody please save the audio and have it turned over to whoever it's appropraite."

If Heli is so concerned about this, why doesn't he do it himself? 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 01, 2007, 06:21:11 PM
Heli: "Somebody please save the audio and have it turned over to whoever it's appropraite."

If Heli is so concerned about this, why doesn't he do it himself? 

Obviously Heli (she) is not capable of right mouse clicking on the podcast and choosing "save to C: drive".  :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 01, 2007, 06:21:26 PM
Deepak leaving the jail today.  Someone at RU said, look how happy Deepak looks???
Happy?  He looks scared and wondering if he was safer in jail, IMO.


(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/dk120107.jpg)

He knows...it's only a matter of time...until...MOO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Observer on December 01, 2007, 06:22:51 PM
I was trying to recall the last time I saw someone with arms as skinny as Deepak..Maybee as a kid when I saw Kermit for the first time  :lol: He better start lifting weights or something as even the smallest guy in KIA is gonna make Deepak his bitch  :cool:

(http://img338.imageshack.us/img338/8236/200402kermithx6.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Blue Moon on December 01, 2007, 06:24:25 PM
Deepak leaving the jail today.  Someone at RU said, look how happy Deepak looks???
Happy?  He looks scared and wondering if he was safer in jail, IMO.


(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/dk120107.jpg)

He knows...it's only a matter of time...until...MOO

Notice his hands--not in his pockets yet :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: snoopy on December 01, 2007, 06:24:34 PM
HELI: 
I'm not one who gets bent out of shape by whack jobs who flap their
lips but THIS direct threat to Aruba by Red has crossed the line.  He
isn't just commenting, he's addressing himself directly to them and
the threats he's made are outrageous.


It is hard to bend someone who has already become so contorted from twisting the truth.

This is a terrorist threat:  Al-Qaeda has issued a taped message that an attack on the USA is imminent.

This is not a terrorist threat:   If you don't stop messing with Natalee Holloway's family I'll tell everyone I know not to go to Aruba.


That's what you call...

 Stuck On Stupid!!


 :2doh:   :roll:   :shock:   :lol:   :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 01, 2007, 06:27:54 PM
Heli: "Somebody please save the audio and have it turned over to whoever it's appropraite."

If Heli is so concerned about this, why doesn't he do it himself? 

Don't worry Heli, we will keep a copy here and you can drop by anytime you need to listen. I doubt Red is concerned.  :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 01, 2007, 06:28:17 PM
I was trying to recall the last time I saw someone with arms as skinny as Deepak..Maybee as a kid when I saw Kermit for the first time  :lol: He better start lifting weights or something as even the smallest guy in KIA is gonna make Deepak his bitch  :cool:

(http://img338.imageshack.us/img338/8236/200402kermithx6.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)


 :shock:

Kermit ... I love those skinny little arms and ... my eldest son's French Canadian inlaws love those little legs.  Everthing about you is loveable ... just ask Miss Piggy.

Janet

K


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Red on December 01, 2007, 06:28:41 PM
The Insanity Continues … Deepak and Satish Kalpoe Let Out of Jail in Aruba in the Natalee Holloway Case

http://scaredmonkeys.com/2007/12/01/the-insanity-continues-deepak-and-satish-kalpoe-let-out-of-jail-in-aruba-in-the-natalee-holloway-case/

More insanity out of Aruba, two of the three suspects released from jail in the case of the disappearance of Alabama teen Natalee Holloway. Why would Aruban officials and prosecutors continue to make a mockery of this case? With the eyes of not only the United Stated but the world on Aruba, they continue to embarrass themselves in a manner that is beyond ridiculous. How could anyone be so cruel to continually do this to both Beth and Dave Holloway? What are Aruban officials thinking?
(more)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Spock on December 01, 2007, 06:31:03 PM
I wonder how Guido fits into all of this. He was arrested under suspision of heavy battery against Natalee and released. he worked at the Holiday Inn casino and as I recall his shift ended at 3 am the morning Natalee disapeared. I heard it said Joran may have asked for his help that night but that hasnt been substantiated. In the video of Nat, Joran, and likely Paulus at the casino, would that be Guido dealing the cards, or was he at a different table?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 01, 2007, 06:34:07 PM
I wonder how Guido fits into all of this. He was arrested under suspision of heavy battery against Natalee and released. he worked at the Holiday Inn casino and as I recall his shift ended at 3 am the morning Natalee disapeared. I heard it said Joran may have asked for his help that night but that hasnt been substantiated. In the video of Nat, Joran, and likely Paulus at the casino, would that be Guido dealing the cards, or was he at a different table?

In the video we have seen of the casino, general concensus was that it wasn't Guido.  Dealers switch out though, so we have no way of knowing if Guido was ever dealing at that table.  Not sure if that makes any difference anyway.  Very possible Guido helped Joran dispose of the body or evidence that night.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: robots on December 01, 2007, 06:34:32 PM
i said the same thing RED said, i said it earlier today in writing on this site before i even knew RED said anything

go back a few pages and you can read it, copy it paste it all over the place
cause i dont care.... LOL

its called FREE SPEECH

i will publicly tell everyone and do everything that one person can do to make sure everyone knows what a CRAP JUNK HIDEOUS UGLY place aruba is

it is so funny that MORONS think it is a threat... well, it is a threat
it is a THREAT against turning up the heat on the boycott

so go put that in your crack pipe- send it to JOE T. and anyone else you want to


so, go pull your heads out of you collective asses do what you have to do and i will do the same

terroist threat---------??BAWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW

give me a break  :cool: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 01, 2007, 06:38:32 PM
Deepak leaving the jail today.  Someone at RU said, look how happy Deepak looks???
Happy?  He looks scared and wondering if he was safer in jail, IMO.


(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/dk120107.jpg)

OMG, I saw that remark...SavannahStar made it, dipchit. HE LOOKS TERRIFIED!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2007, 06:39:10 PM
What Red said does not constitute a threat, terroristic or otherwise.

It was a PROMISE.  And it is one that each and every one of us has the right to make.  It's called CONSUMER RIGHTS.  We have them in this country along with FREEDOM of SPEECH!

The FBI is very busy with real terroristic threats right now.  Please feel free to annoy the hell out of them with this idiocy.  It will help them know who to put on IGNORE faster. 

But a word of caution.  Do it a few too many times and it will be you reporting who get in trouble as it is against the law to fabricate terrorist threats.  Their is a limit to their patience even when dealing with crackpots like these posters but for sure, check it out, it is highly illegal to falsify terrorist threats and make false claims where none exist and tie up valuable personnel with nonsense like this.  Could backfire big time which would serve these liars right.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: robots on December 01, 2007, 06:39:29 PM
nice ugly mustache deepak


i bet the women will be all over you

oh wait....thats right it doesnt matter what you look like
you DRUG and RAPE them so they never have a chance

then you hide the BODY

you are scum- be careful deepak - sloots will take you out


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Spock on December 01, 2007, 06:41:20 PM
I wonder how Guido fits into all of this. He was arrested under suspision of heavy battery against Natalee and released. he worked at the Holiday Inn casino and as I recall his shift ended at 3 am the morning Natalee disapeared. I heard it said Joran may have asked for his help that night but that hasnt been substantiated. In the video of Nat, Joran, and likely Paulus at the casino, would that be Guido dealing the cards, or was he at a different table?

In the video we have seen of the casino, general concensus was that it wasn't Guido.  Dealers switch out though, so we have no way of knowing if Guido was ever dealing at that table.  Not sure if that makes any difference anyway.  Very possible Guido helped Joran dispose of the body or evidence that night.

Thanks Klaas. Its that heavy Battery charge that bothers me. Joran with manslughter and Guido with heavy battery. Sounds like they were together


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: robots on December 01, 2007, 06:41:30 PM
is he holding a lunch bag in his hand?

or is it - a white trash bag with clothes ????

heheheheheehehh


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: robots on December 01, 2007, 06:43:06 PM
didnt guido get out early that night ???

he must have helped jorkan move Natalee


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Red on December 01, 2007, 06:43:12 PM
i said the same thing RED said, i said it earlier today in writing on this site before i even knew RED said anything

go back a few pages and you can read it, copy it paste it all over the place
cause i dont care.... LOL

its called FREE SPEECH

i will publicly tell everyone and do everything that one person can do to make sure everyone knows what a CRAP JUNK HIDEOUS UGLY place aruba is

it is so funny that MORONS think it is a threat... well, it is a threat
it is a THREAT against turning up the heat on the boycott

so go put that in your crack pipe- send it to JOE T. and anyone else you want to


so, go pull your heads out of you collective asses do what you have to do and i will do the same

terroist threat---------??BAWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW

give me a break  :cool: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


And people wonder where the term "moonbats" came from?

I would think that warning people about going to a place where God forbid anything happening to them that they would be treated like the Natalee Holloway investigation would be more of a PSA, a public service announcement.

I think the FBI is busy with other matters ... ;)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: robots on December 01, 2007, 06:44:45 PM
i said the same thing RED said, i said it earlier today in writing on this site before i even knew RED said anything

go back a few pages and you can read it, copy it paste it all over the place
cause i dont care.... LOL

its called FREE SPEECH

i will publicly tell everyone and do everything that one person can do to make sure everyone knows what a CRAP JUNK HIDEOUS UGLY place aruba is

it is so funny that MORONS think it is a threat... well, it is a threat
it is a THREAT against turning up the heat on the boycott

so go put that in your crack pipe- send it to JOE T. and anyone else you want to


so, go pull your heads out of you collective asses do what you have to do and i will do the same

terroist threat---------??BAWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW

give me a break  :cool: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


And people wonder where the term "moonbats" came from?

I would think that warning people about going to a place where God forbid anything happening to them that they would be treated like the Natalee Holloway investigation would be more of a PSA, a public service announcement.

I think the FBI is busy with other matters ... ;)

you got it Red  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: robots on December 01, 2007, 06:46:56 PM
there must be a prerequisite to be high as a KITE before you can post at certain sites. i mean some of the theories they have are TOTALLY INSANE

i wont even mention them because they are so stupid but you all know what i mean

<shaking head> with disgust


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Red on December 01, 2007, 06:48:25 PM
What Red said does not constitute a threat, terroristic or otherwise.

It was a PROMISE.  And it is one that each and every one of us has the right to make.  It's called CONSUMER RIGHTS.  We have them in this country along with FREEDOM of SPEECH!

The FBI is very busy with real terroristic threats right now.  Please feel free to annoy the hell out of them with this idiocy.  It will help them know who to put on IGNORE faster. 

But a word of caution.  Do it a few too many times and it will be you reporting who get in trouble as it is against the law to fabricate terrorist threats.  Their is a limit to their patience even when dealing with crackpots like these posters but for sure, check it out, it is highly illegal to falsify terrorist threats and make false claims where none exist and tie up valuable personnel with nonsense like this.  Could backfire big time which would serve these liars right.

.

Having known and knowing people at the FBI, DEA & SS you are speaking the truth. These people are very busy and monitor on-line communications anyhow for certain "words".

Try making too many crank reports and see what happens.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2007, 06:48:58 PM
Yes, more of a PSA and Consumer Rights of which they have no concept.  Ditto free speech and a free press.

But sending claims of fake threats to the FBI is punishable and highly illegal.  That's why I say for them to go for it, especially in light of Dompig's claim that the FBI was responsible for his ALE botching the investigation.  Something tells me not only do they have real threats to deal with but they are prolly not much in the mood for this kind of nonsense in the first place.

Dompig said it was the fault of the FBI that the investigation was botched.  So they might just chime in with Red and have a few things to say about that flyspeck themselves.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Spock on December 01, 2007, 06:50:08 PM
didnt guido get out early that night ???

he must have helped jorkan move Natalee

Its the heavy battery charge against Guido and the manslaughter charge against Joran that is puzzling me. With the kalpoes, that makes 4 boys with her, two suspected of battery and killing. How and where did that happen. Could it be they all met up on the beach by the lighthouse?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: San on December 01, 2007, 06:51:09 PM
(http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d118/Sanddrops/Scared%20Monkeys/LOCK2.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2007, 06:52:54 PM
didnt guido get out early that night ???

he must have helped jorkan move Natalee

Its the heavy battery charge against Guido and the manslaughter charge against Joran that is puzzling me. With the kalpoes, that makes 4 boys with her, two suspected of battery and killing. How and where did that happen. Could it be they all met up on the beach by the lighthouse?



That charge has always totally baffled me, too, Spock.  But I think if they had anything on Guido being involved other than in the fabrication of an alibi for Joran the next evening, I think he would also be arrested by now.

But guess we will just have to wait and see.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 01, 2007, 06:54:36 PM
I found this POLL but they seem to have made a mistake  :wink: :wink: :lol: :lol:

http://www.gallup.com/poll/102943/Republicans-Report-Much-Better-Mental-Health-Than-Others.aspx

(http://media.gallup.com/poll/graphs/mentalhealth11302007graph1.gif)

My corrected poll  :lol: :lol: :lol: :wink:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/pollsmarubaru.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Kermit on December 01, 2007, 06:54:48 PM
I was trying to recall the last time I saw someone with arms as skinny as Deepak..Maybee as a kid when I saw Kermit for the first time  :lol: He better start lifting weights or something as even the smallest guy in KIA is gonna make Deepak his bitch  :cool:

(http://img338.imageshack.us/img338/8236/200402kermithx6.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)


I may be skinny, but I'm mighty and for Christmas I'm sending Kalpoes and Joran a box - soap on a rope! Heh Heh


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2007, 06:56:24 PM
didnt guido get out early that night ???

he must have helped jorkan move Natalee

Its the heavy battery charge against Guido and the manslaughter charge against Joran that is puzzling me. With the kalpoes, that makes 4 boys with her, two suspected of battery and killing. How and where did that happen. Could it be they all met up on the beach by the lighthouse?



Spock,

I have posted this new article from the America's Most Wanted site a couple of times but no comments so far.  Note the part about Guido and Geoffrey vCromvoirt.

New Evidence In Natalee Holloway Case?

Satish and Deepak Kalpoe and Joran van der Sloot

Three young men who were previously detained as suspects in the disappearance of American teenager Natalee Holloway have been re-arrested.  This time, the three were arrested on suspicion of involvement in manslaughter and causing seriously bodily harm that caused the death of the 18-year-old American, the prosecutor's office said in a statement.

On Friday, November 23, 2007 a judge ordered Surinamese brothers Satish and Deepak Kalpoe to be detained for at least another eight days while prosecutors continue to pursue the investigation. The brothers have been held since Wednesday, November 21, on suspicion of involvement in Holloway's death.

The Associated Press reports that a third suspect, Dutch teenager Joran van der Sloot, was also ordered to be held for an initial eight-day period while authorities pursue the investigation.  A judge in Aruba ruled there is enough evidence to detain Joran van der Sloot.

The suspects have now been charged with voluntary manslaughter. 

Attorneys Ronald Wix and David Kock told reporters Monday that prosecutors gave them an 11 1/2-page summary of the evidence, and said it mostly contained segments of interrogations that had not been transcribed previously and recordings of conversations from cell phones and discussions inside the home of their client, Satish Kalpoe.



The attorneys disputed prosecution claims that the evidence  submitted to a judge to justify detaining their client and the two others is significant or new.

Prosecutors say they have evidence that Holloway, who was 18 when she disappeared, is dead.



All three suspects have denied any involvement in Holloway's disappearance and were previously released for lack of evidence.

Natalee's father, Dave Holloway, believes that his daughter was thrown into deeper waters than previously searched.  Dave Holloway told the Associated Press that he will relaunch a search for evidence of his daughter's remains in waters off of Aruba.   



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Previous Arrests Yielded Few Answers

A lawyer for Aruban citizenn Guido Wever says his client was arrested in the Netherlands in connection with the Holloway case on May 17, 2006. But Wever was released on Tuesday, May 23rd. The atorney says his client was is suspected of "assisting in the murder" of Natalee Holloway.

While no details have been released regarding Wever's alleged involvement in the case, Wever was an acquaintance of Joran van der Sloot, and had been interviewed on three different occasions as a "witness" by police in Aruba. AMW has confirmed that Wever left the Caribbean island two weeks after Natalee's disappearance.

The Public Prosecutor's Office said Wever remains a suspect. But his lawyer claims this is only a formality, saying: "It is unthinkable that he will be arrested again on the basis of how things stand at the moment in the investigation."

Geoffrey van Cromvoirt, a 19-year-old who was also arrested, but released after 8 days.  Sources close to the investigation say he is suspected of selling drugs, possibly GHB, the so-called "date-rape drug," to Joran van der Sloot and/or his associates, and that this activity may have been involved in the disappearance of Natalee Holloway. The Aruban prosecutor's office said van Cromvoirt "remains a suspect."
Aruban police also arrested a 20-year-old man identified only by the initials A.B. He was questioned about the Holloway case for 6 hours and then released.
Conversation Between Suspects Secretly Recorded

In a press release issued by the Aruban prosecutor's office, authorities have verified that the contents of a transcribed conversation between Joran van der Sloot, Deepak Kalpoe, and Satish Kalpoe, are authentic. The recorded conversation reportedly took place in June 2005 in a police vehicle while the three suspects were being transported either to or from a court appearance or jail.

The six-page transcript shows the three young men exchanging harsh words, accusing one another of lying, and mentioning Natalee Holloway several times, referring to her as "the girl."

When the Kalpoe brothers and van der Sloot were released from custody in September 2005, then-Police Chief Gerold Dompig was still certain they were involved in Natalee's disappearance, telling AMW, "I have a gut feeling that they're guilty...either it's murder, or an accident, or rape...but something happened, and they were surely involved."

Since then, the three young men have remained under public scrutiny. Authorities will not comment further on the recorded conversation or what they make of it.


History Of False Hope

Natalee was last seen at a popular night club in Aruba. The search for Natalee Holloway has followed a winding path. Each time Beth Holloway-Twitty and Dave Holloway have found a lead to cling to, their hopes have been dashed.

All Suspects Released

On September 3, 2005 Joran van der Sloot, Satish and Deepak Kalpoe were all released from police custody on the condition they stay available to authorities for questioning. Although prosecutors wanted to hold all three suspects longer, an Arbuban judge ordered their release. Even though the three men are free, authorities say they will continue to investigate the connection between these three men and the disappearance of Natalee Holloway.

No Sign Of Missing Alabama Teen At Aruban Pond

Investigators searched a pond not far from the Holiday Inn where Natalee stayed -- but there were no signs. The pond was searched after a witness claimed to have seen the three suspects named in Natalee's disappearance sitting in a parked car near the pond. In addition to the pond, authorities searched a landfill three times.


DNA Not Holloway's

According to the FBI, DNA taken from strands of blond hair stuck to duct tape found on a beach in Aruba did not match the DNA of missing Alabama teenager Natalee Holloway. A park ranger found the duct tape while collecting trash on Aruba's northeast coast - the opposite side of the island from where the Alabama woman was last seen in public. The results of two tests on the hair came back negative.


Tracing Natalee's Steps
Natalee Ann Holloway had just graduated from Mountain Brook High School in Birmingham, Ala.  She was looking forward to attending the University of Alabama on a full academic scholarship. 

On an unofficial annual senior trip Natalee and approximately 130 of her classmates ventured thousands of miles away to enjoy the white sands and blue waters of Aruba. 

For five days the recent graduates and seven chaperones relaxed, sun bathed and enjoyed the Aruba nightlife. 

Dressed in the same blue and green striped low-cut blouse and jean miniskirt that she wore at the beach earlier in the day, Holloway spent Sunday evening partying at Carlos 'N Charlie's, a popular restaurant and dance spot where tourists and locals meet in the Aruban capital, Oranjestad.

Monday morning, May 31, 2005 when the rest of the group gathered to catch their flight, Natalee was no where to be found. 

Carlos N' Charlie's master of ceremonies, Jose Hernandez, saw Natalee leave about 10 minutes before the restaurant's 1 a.m. closing. He reports that nothing seemed out of the ordinary. Meanwhile, some of Natalee's friends say they saw her getting into a vehicle outside the nightclub.

http://www.amw.com/missing_persons/case.cfm?id=32411

The Associated Press contributed to this report
 
 
 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Kermit on December 01, 2007, 06:57:23 PM
I was trying to recall the last time I saw someone with arms as skinny as Deepak..Maybee as a kid when I saw Kermit for the first time  :lol: He better start lifting weights or something as even the smallest guy in KIA is gonna make Deepak his bitch  :cool:

(http://img338.imageshack.us/img338/8236/200402kermithx6.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)


 :shock:

Kermit ... I love those skinny little arms and ... my eldest son's French Canadian inlaws love those little legs.  Everthing about you is loveable ... just ask Miss Piggy.

Janet

K


Miss Piggy licks me ears!

Your son's inlaws should know better then to eat frog legs!  :smt018



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Kermit on December 01, 2007, 06:59:40 PM
Deepak leaving the jail today.  Someone at RU said, look how happy Deepak looks???
Happy?  He looks scared and wondering if he was safer in jail, IMO.


(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/dk120107.jpg)

Don't cook tonight have Chicken delight


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Spock on December 01, 2007, 07:00:14 PM
didnt guido get out early that night ???

he must have helped jorkan move Natalee

Its the heavy battery charge against Guido and the manslaughter charge against Joran that is puzzling me. With the kalpoes, that makes 4 boys with her, two suspected of battery and killing. How and where did that happen. Could it be they all met up on the beach by the lighthouse?

Also, remember Satish has said Croes was at C&C that night, Croes gave the false alibi and was fired for leaving the tatoo. It's likely he was there too. That makes 5 boys with her on the beach at some time during the night with heavy battery and manslaughter. The only motive I can think of would be sexual and those charges cant be brought without a body.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: MuffyBee on December 01, 2007, 07:00:30 PM
didnt guido get out early that night ???

he must have helped jorkan move Natalee

Its the heavy battery charge against Guido and the manslaughter charge against Joran that is puzzling me. With the kalpoes, that makes 4 boys with her, two suspected of battery and killing. How and where did that happen. Could it be they all met up on the beach by the lighthouse?


IIRC when the charges are made, the worst/highest form is used.  They can  then can be  charged on a lesser accouant , but can't be charged on an account then is more than the first named.  Does anyone remember this?  Sorry if I'm not making this clear.  Maybe NYC can splain...  The charge against Joran is Voluntary Manslaughter.  He may not be found guilty of anything more serious than that.  However, the charge of Voluntary Manslaughter can be reduced...Making any sense?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Observer on December 01, 2007, 07:00:53 PM
I wonder how Guido fits into all of this. He was arrested under suspision of heavy battery against Natalee and released. he worked at the Holiday Inn casino and as I recall his shift ended at 3 am the morning Natalee disapeared. I heard it said Joran may have asked for his help that night but that hasnt been substantiated. In the video of Nat, Joran, and likely Paulus at the casino, would that be Guido dealing the cards, or was he at a different table?

In the video we have seen of the casino, general concensus was that it wasn't Guido.  Dealers switch out though, so we have no way of knowing if Guido was ever dealing at that table.  Not sure if that makes any difference anyway.  Very possible Guido helped Joran dispose of the body or evidence that night.

Thanks Klaas. Its that heavy Battery charge that bothers me. Joran with manslughter and Guido with heavy battery. Sounds like they were together
I definetly think Guido was with Joran that night after work. Also I think that the reported scratches on his face are a big clue into what happened that night."She was acting crazy" Always has stuck in my head and it's possible that it wasnt just Joran who tried to restrain Natalee that night. Natalee fighting back and Joran cracking her in the head is what I think happened.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Kermit on December 01, 2007, 07:03:58 PM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/dk120107.jpg)

Expect the unexpected


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Buckeye on December 01, 2007, 07:04:23 PM
Joran's lawyer, Ariean deBie has a quote in DeTelegraaf with among other points this (translated):

Natalee Holloway has a very active mother and a weapon merchant as stepfather that obvious contacts has in the White House.  The FBI has interrogated in America a little bit but dug not deeply enough.  About this its many questions over to put. 



Guess he's been eating at Anita's table (I would say house but I don't know where that is this week).

I would love to hear Mos' comment on this.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Red on December 01, 2007, 07:05:07 PM
I found this POLL but they seem to have made a mistake  :wink: :wink: :lol: :lol:

http://www.gallup.com/poll/102943/Republicans-Report-Much-Better-Mental-Health-Than-Others.aspx

(http://media.gallup.com/poll/graphs/mentalhealth11302007graph1.gif)

My corrected poll  :lol: :lol: :lol: :wink:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/pollsmarubaru.jpg)

HAHAHAHAHA!!! So you have been polling in your free time Klaas?



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Spock on December 01, 2007, 07:05:56 PM
Actually, no one has been charged yet, they have just been detained under suspision. It doesnt matter what the suspision "charge" is, it can be upped later when formal charges are made and a trial date is set. Its the formal trial charges that cant be upped. If under interrogation, one admits to a higher crime, those charge can be formally brought for trial.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Observer on December 01, 2007, 07:07:46 PM

I may be skinny, but I'm mighty and for Christmas I'm sending Kalpoes and Joran a box - soap on a rope! Heh Heh

Sorry Kermit..You are mighty and one to be reckoned with :lol: Deepak is dumb,has stick arms and has a temper. Not a good mix  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2007, 07:07:57 PM
didnt guido get out early that night ???

he must have helped jorkan move Natalee

Its the heavy battery charge against Guido and the manslaughter charge against Joran that is puzzling me. With the kalpoes, that makes 4 boys with her, two suspected of battery and killing. How and where did that happen. Could it be they all met up on the beach by the lighthouse?

Also, remember Satish has said Croes was at C&C that night, Croes gave the false alibi and was fired for leaving the tatoo. It's likely he was there too. That makes 5 boys with her on the beach at some time during the night with heavy battery and manslaughter. The only motive I can think of would be sexual and those charges cant be brought without a body.

While that may have happened at some time in the past or been the INTENT in this instance, I haven't seen anything that convinces me that anything like this actually happened.  I tend to believe that Joran killed Natalee before anything like that had a chance to transpire.

Otherwise I think we would be seeing more attests by now. 

MO only.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Kermit on December 01, 2007, 07:07:58 PM
(http://www.bucuticam.com/zoom1.jpg)

TOURISM DOWN TO 3


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 01, 2007, 07:08:22 PM
didnt guido get out early that night ???

he must have helped jorkan move Natalee

Which time?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Kermit on December 01, 2007, 07:08:59 PM

I may be skinny, but I'm mighty and for Christmas I'm sending Kalpoes and Joran a box - soap on a rope! Heh Heh

Sorry Kermit..You are mighty and one to be reckoned with :lol: Deepak is dumb,has stick arms and has a temper. Not a good mix  :wink:


heh heh

Dr. Phil's people are still waiting for those documents from skinny fry Deepak


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: MuffyBee on December 01, 2007, 07:11:37 PM
Actually, no one has been charged yet, they have just been detained under suspision. It doesnt matter what the suspision "charge" is, it can be upped later when formal charges are made and a trial date is set. Its the formal trial charges that cant be upped. If under interrogation, one admits to a higher crime, those charge can be formally brought for trial.

Thank you, Spock.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2007, 07:12:16 PM
Joran's lawyer, Ariean deBie has a quote in DeTelegraaf with among other points this (translated):

Natalee Holloway has a very active mother and a weapon merchant as stepfather that obvious contacts has in the White House.  The FBI has interrogated in America a little bit but dug not deeply enough.  About this its many questions over to put. 



Guess he's been eating at Anita's table (I would say house but I don't know where that is this week).

I would love to hear Mos' comment on this.



Oh, good!  Now this is material for Jug a libel suit.  Weapons merchant is hilarious.  Nice to see they still have their minds in the gutter as always, however.  Just because they are slime doesn't mean everybody else is.  Guess they don't know metal can be used for anything else in their little disturbed fantasy world.  And this guy is supposed to be Joran's lawyer???

If this is an example of his intelligence, Joran is toast.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Spock on December 01, 2007, 07:12:39 PM
didnt guido get out early that night ???

he must have helped jorkan move Natalee

Its the heavy battery charge against Guido and the manslaughter charge against Joran that is puzzling me. With the kalpoes, that makes 4 boys with her, two suspected of battery and killing. How and where did that happen. Could it be they all met up on the beach by the lighthouse?

Also, remember Satish has said Croes was at C&C that night, Croes gave the false alibi and was fired for leaving the tatoo. It's likely he was there too. That makes 5 boys with her on the beach at some time during the night with heavy battery and manslaughter. The only motive I can think of would be sexual and those charges cant be brought without a body.

While that may have happened at some time in the past or been the INTENT in this instance, I haven't seen anything that convinces me that anything like this actually happened.  I tend to believe that Joran killed Natalee before anything like that had a chance to transpire.

Otherwise I think we would be seeing more attests by now. 


But why arrest Guido under the "charge" of heavy battery then?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Kermit on December 01, 2007, 07:14:45 PM
(http://img84.imageshack.us/img84/5267/prosecutornr0.jpg)


COME ON MOS - FILE THE CHARGES AND BRING ON THE TRIAL




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Observer on December 01, 2007, 07:15:43 PM

I may be skinny, but I'm mighty and for Christmas I'm sending Kalpoes and Joran a box - soap on a rope! Heh Heh

Sorry Kermit..You are mighty and one to be reckoned with :lol: Deepak is dumb,has stick arms and has a temper. Not a good mix  :wink:


heh heh

Dr. Phil's people are still waiting for those documents from skinny fry Deepak

I think they are done waiting and this year long lawsuit will be over in 6 days. I can't imagine that judge putting up with anymore more bs.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2007, 07:17:04 PM
Spock,
I think Cowgirl Janssen arrested ALL of Joran's friends that he might have talked to about this, labeled them suspects so they could lie to the cops.  That way, even if Joran had been blabbing all over the place, they, being suspects themselves, were then free to lie for him or lie about whatever he might have told them without fear of prosecution.

And Nut is right which time for Guido could have assisted in some way with disposal later than the first night.  But I tend to think it was to give all that Joran might have told something to a Get Out of Jail Free card to lie about him and what he said because of their suspect status.

Just my opinion and worth nothing.  I am sure others have other theories as well.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2007, 07:21:50 PM
Spock,

I think the more Cowgirl Janssen thought Joran might have talked to somebody, the more grave the charges.  Since he was with Guido the next night, in order to keep Guido in line and also allow him to legally lie, she was more creative with his suspicions.

The suspicions increase right on up to Freddie actually being arrested for his previous CD of underaged girl, just a little reminder what the Prosecution could do to them if they didn't go along with the cover up.

She was doing whatever Paulus or someone else wanted her to do on through refusing to talk to Koen again about the boat.  But it could have been Paulus who borrowed and drove the boat himself, I don't see him asking any of these juvenile delinquents for assistance and exposing himself and his Precious to that kind of leaks in the future.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Spock on December 01, 2007, 07:22:49 PM
Spock,
I think Cowgirl Janssen arrested ALL of Joran's friends that he might have talked to about this, labeled them suspects so they could lie to the cops.  That way, even if Joran had been blabbing all over the place, they, being suspects themselves, were then free to lie for him or lie about whatever he might have told them without fear of prosecution.

And Nut is right which time for Guido could have assisted in some way with disposal later than the first night.  But I tend to think it was to give all that Joran might have told something to a Get Out of Jail Free card to lie about him and what he said because of their suspect status.

Just my opinion and worth nothing.  I am sure others have other theories as well.

Interesting the kalpoes were not charged with heavy battery and Guido was.  Guido must hav been there. I n order to file that charge, they had to convince the Judge, first that  Guido was there, and second may have hurt her. They could not bring that charge without strong evidence he was there.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2007, 07:25:22 PM
Sspock,

You may be right.

I just don't know, wasn't there but am waiting as I think Mos is our best hope of ever finding out exactly what did happen.

I hope and pray the Parents were told today along with JQK.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Spock on December 01, 2007, 07:26:44 PM
Interesting the kalpoes were not charged with heavy battery and Guido was.  Guido must have been there. In order to file that charge and detain him, they had to convince the Judge, first that Guido was there, and second that he may have hurt her. They could not bring that charge and detain him without strong evidence he was there. So Guido must have been there.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2007, 07:26:58 PM
I have to leave but is there any known media coverage tonight?

I would love to see JQK on something tonight.  I know he won't tell what they learned today but would still like his take on things like the strength of any evidence they now have.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 01, 2007, 07:31:47 PM
I have to leave but is there any known media coverage tonight?

I would love to see JQK on something tonight.  I know he won't tell what they learned today but would still like his take on things like the strength of any evidence they now have.

.

Repeats:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/FoxCoverage.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2007, 07:34:10 PM
Thanks, Klaas!

Well, maybe someone will surprise us with JQK. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Buckeye on December 01, 2007, 07:35:41 PM
Interesting the kalpoes were not charged with heavy battery and Guido was.  Guido must have been there. In order to file that charge and detain him, they had to convince the Judge, first that Guido was there, and second that he may have hurt her. They could not bring that charge and detain him without strong evidence he was there. So Guido must have been there.


I don't believe he was held.  They pick them up then need to present to the judge (a couple days later).  He was not detained.  The "suspicion" of "heavy battery" and confiscating of property has always drawn my attention.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 01, 2007, 07:37:12 PM
<<<<<<<snipped>>>>>  from Anna's post....

Previous Arrests Yielded Few Answers

A lawyer for Aruban citizenn Guido Wever says his client was arrested in the Netherlands in connection with the Holloway case on May 17, 2006. But Wever was released on Tuesday, May 23rd. The atorney says his client was is suspected of "assisting in the murder" of Natalee Holloway.

While no details have been released regarding Wever's alleged involvement in the case, Wever was an acquaintance of Joran van der Sloot, and had been interviewed on three different occasions as a "witness" by police in Aruba. AMW has confirmed that Wever left the Caribbean island two weeks after Natalee's disappearance.

The Public Prosecutor's Office said Wever remains a suspect. But his lawyer claims this is only a formality, saying: "It is unthinkable that he will be arrested again on the basis of how things stand at the moment in the investigation."

Geoffrey van Cromvoirt, a 19-year-old who was also arrested, but released after 8 days.  Sources close to the investigation say he is suspected of selling drugs, possibly GHB, the so-called "date-rape drug," to Joran van der Sloot and/or his associates, and that this activity may have been involved in the disappearance of Natalee Holloway. The Aruban prosecutor's office said van Cromvoirt "remains a suspect."
Aruban police also arrested a 20-year-old man identified only by the initials A.B. He was questioned about the Holloway case for 6 hours and then released.Conversation Between Suspects Secretly Recorded

In a press release issued by the Aruban prosecutor's office, authorities have verified that the contents of a transcribed conversation between Joran van der Sloot, Deepak Kalpoe, and Satish Kalpoe, are authentic. The recorded conversation reportedly took place in June 2005 in a police vehicle while the three suspects were being transported either to or from a court appearance or jail.

The six-page transcript shows the three young men exchanging harsh words, accusing one another of lying, and mentioning Natalee Holloway several times, referring to her as "the girl."

When the Kalpoe brothers and van der Sloot were released from custody in September 2005, then-Police Chief Gerold Dompig was still certain they were involved in Natalee's disappearance, telling AMW, "I have a gut feeling that they're guilty...either it's murder, or an accident, or rape...but something happened, and they were surely involved."

Since then, the three young men have remained under public scrutiny. Authorities will not comment further on the recorded conversation or what they make of it.

Simian Says: June 23rd, 2005 at 11:03 am
1. No body; no crime.
2. A grown woman gone missing.
3. Één getuige is géén getuige. (One witness is no witness).
4. No suspect is allowed to testify against himself.
5. A confession will be thrown out of court if there is no evidence.





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 01, 2007, 07:40:00 PM
Joran's lawyer, Ariean deBie has a quote in DeTelegraaf with among other points this (translated):

Natalee Holloway has a very active mother and a weapon merchant as stepfather that obvious contacts has in the White House.  The FBI has interrogated in America a little bit but dug not deeply enough.  About this its many questions over to put. 



Guess he's been eating at Anita's table (I would say house but I don't know where that is this week).

I would love to hear Mos' comment on this.



Oh, good!  Now this is material for Jug a libel suit.  Weapons merchant is hilarious.  Nice to see they still have their minds in the gutter as always, however.  Just because they are slime doesn't mean everybody else is.  Guess they don't know metal can be used for anything else in their little disturbed fantasy world.  And this guy is supposed to be Joran's lawyer???

If this is an example of his intelligence, Joran is toast.

.

What are these people smoking??  It's better than crack. :roll: :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: nonesuche on December 01, 2007, 07:45:48 PM
Posted by Glenda at RU:

Glenda Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 2:06 pm   
Beth spends 6 hours with OM

Word on the street, she was being questioned for six hours. Dave and JQK also there. 


English translation:  Hans Mos spent 6 hours with Beth, Dave and JQK going over the case against JK2 & P

I find Glenda/Renho's language fascinating.

Imagine this Renho, imagine that Beth delivered Mos a full copy of her journal in which YOUR name is linked to every wild haired scheme to include sending Jug & friends to search choller houses, every deceitful false lead including phantom white cars with blondes or mr toad's wild ride to see the body that never appeared, hmmm......you wanting Natalee's clothing, you then revealing your true intent to write a book stating Jug molested his stepdaughter......oh I know there is more BUT........dearest Renho, Mos might just decide to pull YOU in and question YOU for six hours or six DAYS?

He hasn't been one of your patrons for your deep dark services, might be kind of hard to blackmail him as you do so many others  :lol:

rest well tonight and every night Renho, the gig is likely UP for you  :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Buckeye on December 01, 2007, 07:46:05 PM
A little reminder (from Jonothan)

Alltogether, Joran has told at least four significantly different versions. From May 31-June 10 he claimed they left Natalee at her hotel. From June 10-13 he claimed the Kalpoes left him at home and drove off with Natalee. From June 13-19 he claimed Deepak picked him up and he left Natalee asleep on the beach. Since June 19 he's claimed that Satish picked him up, and either on that date or later, he began saying he left Natalee awake on the beach looking at the stars. Additionally, if it's true that on May 30, Joran told Deepak he was walking home, having just left Natalee passed out on the beach, then that's five or six versions. And if it's true that on May 31, Joran told his friend Freddy that the Kalpoes took him home, after they all left Natalee passed out on the beach, that makes six or seven versions.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Puzzler on December 01, 2007, 07:47:31 PM
Posted by Glenda at RU:

Glenda Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 2:06 pm   
Beth spends 6 hours with OM

Word on the street, she was being questioned for six hours. Dave and JQK also there. 


English translation:  Hans Mos spent 6 hours with Beth, Dave and JQK going over the case against JK2 & P

I find Glenda/Renho's language fascinating.

Imagine this Renho, imagine that Beth delivered Mos a full copy of her journal in which YOUR name is linked to every wild haired scheme to include sending Jug & friends to search choller houses, every deceitful false lead including phantom white cars with blondes or mr toad's wild ride to see the body that never appeared, hmmm......you wanting Natalee's clothing, you then revealing your true intent to write a book stating Jug molested his stepdaughter......oh I know there is more BUT........dearest Renho, Mos might just decide to pull YOU in and question YOU for six hours or six DAYS?

He hasn't been one of your patrons for your deep dark services, might be kind of hard to blackmail him as you do so many others  :lol:

rest well tonight and every night Renho, the gig is likely UP for you  :lol:

 :lol: :lol: :lol:



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 01, 2007, 07:54:43 PM
http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/americas/12/01/aruba.holloway/

Sorry if it is a repeat.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on December 01, 2007, 07:59:42 PM
Hello Monkeys.
Life has become even more hectic here and I have only just managed to keep up with reading, usually as a guest as I get such frequent interruptions, without trying to post.
Like many monkeys I was disheartened to read of the Kalpoes release but further perusal of the news items and statements lead me to believe there is still to be charges laid in this case.
It is a plus that Beth and Dave met for so long with Hans Mos and I feel sure that they were able to add to his knowledge of the events and the machinations that followed.
We must continue to be positive for the final outcome and remain strong in our support of Beth and Dave and all of Natalee's family.
 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Observer on December 01, 2007, 08:01:20 PM
Foxnews Kalpoes released

Short comment by mos and the shows k2 arriving at home

http://youtube.com/watch?v=Kut3JF9Ho-I


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on December 01, 2007, 08:02:38 PM
Deepak leaving the jail today.  Someone at RU said, look how happy Deepak looks???
Happy?  He looks scared and wondering if he was safer in jail, IMO.


(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/dk120107.jpg)

He knows...it's only a matter of time...until...MOO

If this is Deepak looking happy - I would hate to meet him when he is having a  bad day


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 01, 2007, 08:04:04 PM
Joran's lawyer, Ariean deBie has a quote in DeTelegraaf with among other points this (translated):

Natalee Holloway has a very active mother and a weapon merchant as stepfather that obvious contacts has in the White House.  The FBI has interrogated in America a little bit but dug not deeply enough.  About this its many questions over to put. 



Guess he's been eating at Anita's table (I would say house but I don't know where that is this week).

I would love to hear Mos' comment on this.



Oh, good!  Now this is material for Jug a libel suit.  Weapons merchant is hilarious.  Nice to see they still have their minds in the gutter as always, however.  Just because they are slime doesn't mean everybody else is.  Guess they don't know metal can be used for anything else in their little disturbed fantasy world.  And this guy is supposed to be Joran's lawyer???

If this is an example of his intelligence, Joran is toast.

.


Is this new or old?
Why are they so obsessed with the fact that Jug had contacts in the Whitehouse?! Holy crap I am so tired of that line!! As though it were a criminal offense!! Look, if my son went missing, you better believe I would be calling on every source of help I knew of to help me find him!! Now I don't know anyone in the Whitehouse, but I know the Major, our Congressman, and have close friends who know our Senator. That happens when you are active in your community and join civic organizations!!!!! Do I go to dinner with them no, but you are darned tootin' I would be calling on them for help if my son was missing in Aruba!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Blue Moon on December 01, 2007, 08:06:35 PM
Deepak leaving the jail today.  Someone at RU said, look how happy Deepak looks???
Happy?  He looks scared and wondering if he was safer in jail, IMO.


(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/dk120107.jpg)

He knows...it's only a matter of time...until...MOO

Do you think Mos let Beth and Dave have a few words with boys before they let them go?  Strange they waited until today to release them.

If this is Deepak looking happy - I would hate to meet him when he is having a  bad day


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 01, 2007, 08:09:28 PM
didnt guido get out early that night ???

he must have helped jorkan move Natalee

Its the heavy battery charge against Guido and the manslaughter charge against Joran that is puzzling me. With the kalpoes, that makes 4 boys with her, two suspected of battery and killing. How and where did that happen. Could it be they all met up on the beach by the lighthouse?


Spock ... other than the elusive suspicions filed against Geoffrey van Cromvoirt (GVC) ... the suspicions which justified the initial detainment of the suspects in the Natalee Holloway case and the first rearrest of the Kalpoe brothers ...  implied pre-meditated murder ... assessory to murder ... kidnapping ....

In the talk show circuit ... two Aruban attorneys were quoted as stating that strong or serious suspicions were required for the prosecutor to justify the detainment of a suspect.

When the security guards ... the detainment Joran, Deepak, Satish, Paulus, Steve Croes, Guildo and GVC as well as ... the Kalpoes' first rearrest are taken into consideration ... Karin Janssen and the judges had a difference of opinion eleven times in regards to the definition of serious/strong evidence ... there was not one meeting of the minds in regards to their respective interpretation of Dutch law ... all eleven suspects walked. 

Janet

++++++++++++++++

INITIAL DETAINMENT

1.  Mickey John:  first and second-degree murder and capital kidnapping.

2.  Abraham Jones:  first and second-degree murder and capital kidnapping.
 
3.  Joran van der Sllot:  Suspicion of murder and kidnapping as well as being an accessory to murder

4.  Deepak Kalpoe:   Suspicion of murder and kidnapping as well as being an accessory to murder.

5.  Satish Kalpoe:  Suspicion of murder and kidnapping as well as being an accessory to murder.

6. Steve Croes:   Suspicion of murder and kidnapping as well as being an accessory to murder.   

7.  Paulus van der Sloot:  complicity to pre-meditated murder, complicity to kidnapping and murder and kidnapping.

8.  Geoffrey van Cromvoirt:  criminal offenses that may be related to the disappearance" of Natalee Holloway.

9.  Guido Weaver:  Assisting in the murder, heavy battery and kidnapping" of the teen


FIRST REARREST - KALPOES

10.  Deepak Kalpoe:  Suspected of the primary criminal act of together with other people committing premeditated murder, alternately together with other people murdering somebody, more alternately rob a person of her liberty with fatal consequences and even more alternately, raping somebody and new suspicions.

11.  Satish Kalpoe:  Suspected of the primary criminal act of together with other people committing premeditated murder, alternately together with other people murdering somebody, more alternately rob a person of her liberty with fatal consequences and even more alternately, raping somebody and new suspicions

+++++++++++++


Arlene Ellis-Schipper
NANCY GRACE
July 20, 2005


ARLENE ELLIS-SCHIPPER, ARUBAN ATTORNEY: There is no grand jury in Aruba. It`s a different system. You are arrested based on suspicion, on strong suspicion.


Noraina Pietersz - Defence Attorney
Associated Press
June 9, 2005


Under Aruban law, only serious suspicion from investigators — not solid evidence — is needed for a judge to rule that suspects can be held, Pietersz said.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Observer on December 01, 2007, 08:10:07 PM

If this is Deepak looking happy - I would hate to meet him when he is having a  bad day
They said the same thing about Joran..It look's more like he is on a trip to hell than disneyland  :wink:

(http://img123.imageshack.us/img123/3518/joran112607asmhu0.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on December 01, 2007, 08:12:31 PM
Posted by Glenda at RU:

Glenda Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 2:06 pm   
Beth spends 6 hours with OM

Word on the street, she was being questioned for six hours. Dave and JQK also there. 


English translation:  Hans Mos spent 6 hours with Beth, Dave and JQK going over the case against JK2 & P

I find Glenda/Renho's language fascinating.

Imagine this Renho, imagine that Beth delivered Mos a full copy of her journal in which YOUR name is linked to every wild haired scheme to include sending Jug & friends to search choller houses, every deceitful false lead including phantom white cars with blondes or mr toad's wild ride to see the body that never appeared, hmmm......you wanting Natalee's clothing, you then revealing your true intent to write a book stating Jug molested his stepdaughter......oh I know there is more BUT........dearest Renho, Mos might just decide to pull YOU in and question YOU for six hours or six DAYS?

He hasn't been one of your patrons for your deep dark services, might be kind of hard to blackmail him as you do so many others  :lol:

rest well tonight and every night Renho, the gig is likely UP for you  :lol:
LOL....skanky renHO.I hope she gets everything she deserves.Apparently on aol's highly censored message boards,a poster cannot call renHO a skank so here renHO....this is for you,you skank. :-x


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 01, 2007, 08:17:53 PM
Still waiting Simian....who is the 5th suspect?  Email me cindoal@yahoo.com.  If you want to help...tell us who it is...you can this..secretively..you have the ability to do it..I am waiting.  :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 01, 2007, 08:19:13 PM
I was trying to recall the last time I saw someone with arms as skinny as Deepak..Maybee as a kid when I saw Kermit for the first time  :lol: He better start lifting weights or something as even the smallest guy in KIA is gonna make Deepak his bitch  :cool:

(http://img338.imageshack.us/img338/8236/200402kermithx6.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)


 :shock:

Kermit ... I love those skinny little arms and ... my eldest son's French Canadian inlaws love those little legs.  EverYthing about you is loveable ... just ask Miss Piggy.

Janet



Miss Piggy licks me ears!

Your son's inlaws should know better then to eat frog legs!  :smt018



Ribbit


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 01, 2007, 08:21:46 PM
Hello Monkeys.
Life has become even more hectic here and I have only just managed to keep up with reading, usually as a guest as I get such frequent interruptions, without trying to post.
Like many monkeys I was disheartened to read of the Kalpoes release but further perusal of the news items and statements lead me to believe there is still to be charges laid in this case.
It is a plus that Beth and Dave met for so long with Hans Mos and I feel sure that they were able to add to his knowledge of the events and the machinations that followed.
We must continue to be positive for the final outcome and remain strong in our support of Beth and Dave and all of Natalee's family.
 
I so agree. Nice to see you post here again. My life is quite busy off and on. I always look from work but don't post from there, work, you know, it's a secure site and it's just not a smart thing to do. They have recently put in filters as to what comes in from outside and what goes out. No more YouTube or Facebook for anyone government wide. I don't know why ??? LOL And you never know what filters and net nannies they have until you get a " warning ". No more office jokes being circulated either. One of the guys on my team actually got a one week unpaid vacation that he wasn't planning on.
Hope Beth and Dave keep their cards close to their vests on this one. Let the other side just wonder and spin out of control. And I hope they do not make any phone calls from Aruba.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 01, 2007, 08:24:42 PM
Joran's lawyer, Ariean deBie has a quote in DeTelegraaf with among other points this (translated):

Natalee Holloway has a very active mother and a weapon merchant as stepfather that obvious contacts has in the White House.  The FBI has interrogated in America a little bit but dug not deeply enough.  About this its many questions over to put. 



Guess he's been eating at Anita's table (I would say house but I don't know where that is this week).

I would love to hear Mos' comment on this.



Oh, good!  Now this is material for Jug a libel suit.  Weapons merchant is hilarious.  Nice to see they still have their minds in the gutter as always, however.  Just because they are slime doesn't mean everybody else is.  Guess they don't know metal can be used for anything else in their little disturbed fantasy world.  And this guy is supposed to be Joran's lawyer???

If this is an example of his intelligence, Joran is toast.

.

What are these people smoking??  It's better than crack. :roll: :roll:

And if Jug does have friends in the Whitehouse, and I were the refugees, I would not be posting that he is a weapons merchant...may want to make that one dissappear real quick..morons!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 01, 2007, 08:25:57 PM
Joran's lawyer, Ariean deBie has a quote in DeTelegraaf with among other points this (translated):

Natalee Holloway has a very active mother and a weapon merchant as stepfather that obvious contacts has in the White House.  The FBI has interrogated in America a little bit but dug not deeply enough.  About this its many questions over to put. 



Guess he's been eating at Anita's table (I would say house but I don't know where that is this week).

I would love to hear Mos' comment on this.

Now I believe that would border on defamation of character if this was just an ordinary citizen who stated that, but possibly some legal charges coming from an attorney who could have opened him up for some litigation.  A weapons dealer, my skinny a** 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 01, 2007, 08:29:29 PM
"and a weapon merchant as stepfather" :gaah: :gaah:
How udderly stupid. He must have got that one from a fat stupid cow. MOO to You, Anita ! 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 01, 2007, 08:32:25 PM
"and a weapon merchant as stepfather" :gaah: :gaah:
How udderly stupid. He must have got that one from a fat stupid cow. MOO to You, Anita ! 

If Jug was a weapons merchant do you think Joran would be breathing right now?  LOLOLOLOLO  Hey RU, I am laughing...can you see me? 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 01, 2007, 08:34:37 PM
Anita is een zwaarlijvige koe.
Oh, I better go and leave the room and grow up !


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 01, 2007, 08:36:28 PM
"and a weapon merchant as stepfather" :gaah: :gaah:
How udderly stupid. He must have got that one from a fat stupid cow. MOO to You, Anita ! 

If Jug was a weapons merchant do you think Joran would be breathing right now?  LOLOLOLOLO  Hey RU, I am laughing...can you see me? 

good to see you laughing again!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: wreck on December 01, 2007, 08:37:56 PM
Do you think it was Jug who sold arms to Hitler???? :2doh:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 01, 2007, 08:38:26 PM
Foxnews Kalpoes released

Short comment by mos and the shows k2 arriving at home

http://youtube.com/watch?v=Kut3JF9Ho-I

Says he wanted a longer period of time to confront them w/ evidence?? LAY IT ALL OUT BAM...BAM...BAM...there it is. This shit of a little at a time is BULLCRAP!! If he had laid it all out there perhaps they would not have been let go...or am I missing something?? :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 01, 2007, 08:40:19 PM

If this is Deepak looking happy - I would hate to meet him when he is having a  bad day
They said the same thing about Joran..It look's more like he is on a trip to hell than disneyland  :wink:

(http://img123.imageshack.us/img123/3518/joran112607asmhu0.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)

That is why the darkside can't understand the FACTS and what has been going on for so long. They are blind :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 01, 2007, 08:41:04 PM
I have to leave but is there any known media coverage tonight?

I would love to see JQK on something tonight.  I know he won't tell what they learned today but would still like his take on things like the strength of any evidence they now have.

.

Repeats:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/FoxCoverage.jpg)

Good.   I am happy Greta is running this again tomorrow.  I am sure the ratings will go through the ceiling for the opposing networks. It will give the world an insight into Joran's antisocial personality and just how shallow is Greta, e.g., another OJ moment for Greta. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 01, 2007, 08:42:15 PM
Foxnews Kalpoes released

Short comment by mos and the shows k2 arriving at home

http://youtube.com/watch?v=Kut3JF9Ho-I

Says he wanted a longer period of time to confront them w/ evidence?? LAY IT ALL OUT BAM...BAM...BAM...there it is. This shit of a little at a time is BULLCRAP!! If he had laid it all out there perhaps they would not have been let go...or am I missing something?? :roll:

I agree.  Tell it all and if it don't stick, then so be it.  Maybe by the Dec. deadline he will...otherwise it's this.....be linked to the unsolved disappearance of Natalee Holloway.....FOREVER....FOREVER!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 01, 2007, 08:43:46 PM

If this is Deepak looking happy - I would hate to meet him when he is having a  bad day
They said the same thing about Joran..It look's more like he is on a trip to hell than disneyland  :wink:

(http://img123.imageshack.us/img123/3518/joran112607asmhu0.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)

Well, he could be on his way to Disney, he sort of looks Goofy.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 01, 2007, 08:44:19 PM
"and a weapon merchant as stepfather" :gaah: :gaah:
How udderly stupid. He must have got that one from a fat stupid cow. MOO to You, Anita ! 

If Jug was a weapons merchant do you think Joran would be breathing right now?  LOLOLOLOLO  Hey RU, I am laughing...can you see me? 

LMAO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 01, 2007, 08:47:25 PM
Can I get connections to the White House?  My brother-in-law designs warheads.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 01, 2007, 08:50:46 PM
Can I get connections to the White House?  My brother-in-law designs warheads.

My dog sends their dog a Christmas card each year...does that make me connected? 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 01, 2007, 08:50:49 PM
Do you think it was Jug who sold arms to Hitler???? :2doh:

He had to...Beth is related to Hitler...he had to keep the in-laws happy :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 01, 2007, 08:52:01 PM
Can I get connections to the White House?  My brother-in-law designs warheads.

My dog sends their dog a Christmas card each year...does that make me connected? 

Yes, but is your dog Dutch like my BIL? :lol: :lol: :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 01, 2007, 08:52:29 PM
Can I get connections to the White House?  My brother-in-law designs warheads.

My dog sends their dog a Christmas card each year...does that make me connected? 

you are "in" girlfriend...now be careful...refugees and joran's lawyer will have the FBI knocking on your door with connections like that!!!  :lol: :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: AZSunny on December 01, 2007, 08:52:53 PM
When KJ was the chief prosecutor, did she take the evidence to the judge in order for the KJ2 to be held, or did she use another prosecutor like MOS is doing??  Wonder what the norm is there.  I know there is no norm there. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 01, 2007, 08:53:13 PM
Can I get connections to the White House?  My brother-in-law designs warheads.

My dog sends their dog a Christmas card each year...does that make me connected? 

Yes, but is your dog Dutch like my BIL? :lol: :lol: :lol:

roflmao


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 01, 2007, 08:53:31 PM
OK, I'm back. I've had an attitude adjustment, and want to thank Klaas for so kindly  catching me up when I was arriving late to hear the news, Red for giving voice to my frustrations on Dana's show last night, and all you guys for hanging in here in this roller coaster ride. Wouldn't want to ride it alone, and there's no better company in the world than you guys!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 01, 2007, 08:54:57 PM
OK, I'm back. I've had an attitude adjustment, and want to thank Klaas for so kindly  catching me up when I was arriving late to hear the news, Red for giving voice to my frustrations on Dana's show last night, and all you guys for hanging in here in this roller coaster ride. Wouldn't want to ride it alone, and there's no better company in the world than you guys!

You are the best CBB...and so luved!!!  :smt052


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 01, 2007, 09:01:23 PM
Can I get connections to the White House?  My brother-in-law designs warheads.

My dog sends their dog a Christmas card each year...does that make me connected? 

Yes, but is your dog Dutch like my BIL? :lol: :lol: :lol:

No. She's Mexican. LOL


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 01, 2007, 09:01:42 PM
My house is white  :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 01, 2007, 09:04:44 PM
Heading out to play cards with my old neighbors.
Have a great night Monkeys
KEEP THE FAITH!!!!
'Tis the season for miracles!!!! :smt059


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 01, 2007, 09:05:44 PM
My house is white  :lol:

oh my gosh Klaas...was walking away and saw your post...soda up my nose from laughing so hard!!! Good one!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 01, 2007, 09:07:56 PM
Beth on Greta's rerun now.

Thank you, Idstlou~!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 01, 2007, 09:10:10 PM
Beth on Greta's rerun now.

Thank you, Idstlou~!



Anytime!! Thanks for making us so sparkly!!!
Thanks for the soda up my nose Klaas.
Night all Monkeys!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: oldfart on December 01, 2007, 09:15:18 PM
OK, I'm back. I've had an attitude adjustment, and want to thank Klaas for so kindly  catching me up when I was arriving late to hear the news, Red for giving voice to my frustrations on Dana's show last night, and all you guys for hanging in here in this roller coaster ride. Wouldn't want to ride it alone, and there's no better company in the world than you guys!
Kinda out of the loop today CBB  but I did drag out the  :smt075 and :smt014 earlier this morning for LaLa's her and her attitude  and I think  :smt032 was the convincing force   That is not over yet...

Sorry  for just popping in ... I need need to read backwards & forwards a lot...but glad glad you are riding ton he coaster vs just laying down on its tracks..

SeeYaByee


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 01, 2007, 09:15:35 PM
Without benefit of back reading, I've come to this conclusion and hope:

If Deepak and Satish didn't actually participate in Natalee's murder itself, the content of the recordings when they discussed the case between themselves, of course wouldn't reveal they did. Therefore, even though there would be strong evidence they participated in the disposal of a body, it would not support the manslaughter charge.

The same evidence would supprt a manslaughter charge against Joran because they could very well have discussed the need to dispose of her body because Joran killed her or that she died due to his actions.

So, there is reason to hope for an optimistic outcome. We have also not heard anything concerning the infiltrator and what he brings to the table, and there is hope in that.

I continue to believe that Hans Mos is above board, and continue to believe that the judges making decisions are yet to prove themselves the same.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2007, 09:17:58 PM
Foxnews Kalpoes released

Short comment by mos and the shows k2 arriving at home

http://youtube.com/watch?v=Kut3JF9Ho-I

Says he wanted a longer period of time to confront them w/ evidence?? LAY IT ALL OUT BAM...BAM...BAM...there it is. This shit of a little at a time is BULLCRAP!! If he had laid it all out there perhaps they would not have been let go...or am I missing something?? :roll:

I agree.  Tell it all and if it don't stick, then so be it.  Maybe by the Dec. deadline he will...otherwise it's this.....be linked to the unsolved disappearance of Natalee Holloway.....FOREVER....FOREVER!!


I don't think it would matter what the evidence against them might be because it is the crime of which they are suspected, hiding evidence and a corpse or whatever, that is the reason they are not being detained.  They are not suspected of the voluntary manslaughter that Joran is apparently.

This crime is not considered worthy of detaining them as it carries less than four years sentence and so they would not be held no matter the evidence.

The Prosecutor is appealing but I think only because he claims he wants to interrogate them further.

But who knows, this is only my take on things.  May be totally off here.  With only thirty days left, I will just have to wait and see.  We have waited this long, another month is a piece of cake.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 01, 2007, 09:18:54 PM
I've got a couple of avis to make, so I'll BRB.

Hiya, Old Fart!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 01, 2007, 09:47:48 PM
Can I get connections to the White House?  My brother-in-law designs warheads.

My dog sends their dog a Christmas card each year...does that make me connected? 

Yes, but is your dog Dutch like my BIL? :lol: :lol: :lol:

No. She's Mexican. LOL

Then you are okay.  I just don't like that Dutch attorney throwing rocks at those people who participate in weaponry or arms without knowing that my BIL is a Dutch-American and I believe we sell arms to Europeans....so, just saying...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2007, 09:56:08 PM
Maybe Joran's attorney should write our Dept of Justice and ask them if Jug sold weaponry to Hitler.  Janssen was stupid enough to actually write them about Beth so should be easy for this ignorant lawyer to do so.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2007, 10:01:09 PM
I do not take seriously anything that Karin Janssen ever did in this flub up of an investigation.  As far as I am concerned, it is all starting anew with Hans Mos in charge.

I think Janssen's every action was motivated by protecting and cooperating with Paulus and catering to his every whim.  Her arrest of so called suspects seemed to be more to protect Joran from any testimony they might could give about him that their own implication in the original crime.

At least we may now know finally what Deepak's car was doing at the Sloot Compound the night Beth arrived just minutes before she got there when he and Joran swear they were gambling away at either the Radisson or the Windham depending on which lie they are telling at the moment.

And it's just exactly what we thought, they were moving the remains most likely and were almost caught red handed by Natalee's mother. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: wreck on December 01, 2007, 10:02:47 PM
Quote
Maybe Joran's attorney should write our Dept of Justice and ask them if Jug sold weaponry to Hitler.  Janssen was stupid enough to actually write them about Beth so should be easy for this ignorant lawyer to do so.

Do you think it was Jug who sold arms to Hitler???? :2doh:
We're on the same page!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: robots on December 01, 2007, 10:09:33 PM
I do not take seriously anything that Karin Janssen ever did in this flub up of an investigation.  As far as I am concerned, it is all starting anew with Hans Mos in charge.

I think Janssen's every action was motivated by protecting and cooperating with Paulus and catering to his every whim.  Her arrest of so called suspects seemed to be more to protect Joran from any testimony they might could give about him that their own implication in the original crime.

At least we may now know finally what Deepak's car was doing at the Sloot Compound the night Beth arrived just minutes before she got there when he and Joran swear they were gambling away at either the Radisson or the Windham depending on which lie they are telling at the moment.

And it's just exactly what we thought, they were moving the remains most likely and were almost caught red handed by Natalee's mother. 

karin sucks


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on December 01, 2007, 10:12:17 PM
Quote
Maybe Joran's attorney should write our Dept of Justice and ask them if Jug sold weaponry to Hitler.  Janssen was stupid enough to actually write them about Beth so should be easy for this ignorant lawyer to do so.

Do you think it was Jug who sold arms to Hitler???? :2doh:
We're on the same page!


Joran's attorney must be extremely worried if he's grasping at straws like this. He'd better be worried.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on December 01, 2007, 10:15:43 PM
"and a weapon merchant as stepfather" :gaah: :gaah:
How udderly stupid. He must have got that one from a fat stupid cow. MOO to You, Anita ! 

If Jug was a weapons merchant do you think Joran would be breathing right now?  LOLOLOLOLO  Hey RU, I am laughing...can you see me? 

LMAO


And if Jug was a weapons dealer, what the hell does that have to do with this case? Blubbering idiots.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 01, 2007, 10:20:54 PM
Still on my wish list  :wink:


(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub2/Sweatyrunningman-new2-1.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2007, 10:21:43 PM
Quote
Maybe Joran's attorney should write our Dept of Justice and ask them if Jug sold weaponry to Hitler.  Janssen was stupid enough to actually write them about Beth so should be easy for this ignorant lawyer to do so.

Do you think it was Jug who sold arms to Hitler???? :2doh:
We're on the same page!



Yeah, I was more or less responding to your post.  I am sure they will work Hitler in there somewhere as they always do.  That is really weird the way the officials in Aruba do that and not this absolutely goofy weapons merchant idiocy.

Do they ALL lie like rugs or what?  I am beginning to think they are a strange collection of the demented or else all on cocaine for real.  Never have I seen such idiocy from supposed educated people.  Maybe it's in that desalinated water, something that makes them stark raving lunatics like this.  Just don't know.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2007, 10:26:40 PM
I would love to see that as well, Klaas, but am thinking we may never see it as I think Paulus knows the law well enough to barely skirt it.

He waived his right not to testify against the Sporter but that was when Joran was only a suspect.  Whatcha wanna bet he will rescind that once Sporter is actually charged which I do believe will happen.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2007, 10:29:22 PM
Trying to get you to Page 50.

The grounds on which Paulus will rescind his waiver of testifying against his Precious is because it would be self incriminating and he can't be forced to do that, etc.

Unless they have something in the taps or infiltration, Paulus might skate on this and boy do I hate to see that happen.  I hope Mos has at least something with which to charge Paulus.  He was behind all this lying in the first place and told Joran he could get him off if only Joran would do as Paulus said.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 01, 2007, 10:30:45 PM
Trying to get you to Page 50.

The grounds on which Paulus will rescind his waiver of testifying against his Precious is because it would be self incriminating and he can't be forced to do that, etc.

Unless they have something in the taps or infiltration, Paulus might skate on this and boy do I hate to see that happen.  I hope Mos has at least something with which to charge Paulus.  He was behind all this lying in the first place and told Joran he could get him off if only Joran would do as Paulus said.

.

Well then maybe I'll just have to be comforted by his disbelief when his "golden boy" goes to jail for manslaughter leading to the death of Natalee.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on December 01, 2007, 10:33:28 PM
Trying to get you to Page 50.

The grounds on which Paulus will rescind his waiver of testifying against his Precious is because it would be self incriminating and he can't be forced to do that, etc.

Unless they have something in the taps or infiltration, Paulus might skate on this and boy do I hate to see that happen.  I hope Mos has at least something with which to charge Paulus.  He was behind all this lying in the first place and told Joran he could get him off if only Joran would do as Paulus said.

.

Well then maybe I'll just have to be comforted by his disbelief when his "golden boy" goes to jail for manslaughter leading to the death of Natalee.


Who knows, maybe the Kalpoes have decided they've had enough of this and that last day holdover was for spilling their guts for leniency.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2007, 10:33:42 PM
And when that Golden Boy realizes he would have been better of to have come clean from the get go if this was in fact any kind of an accident.  Paulus gave Joran bad advice and sooner or later Sporter even dumb as he is is going to figure that out.

And turn on Paulus like the bad dog that he is.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2007, 10:35:17 PM
Aruba,
Send the bill for all this to 19 Montanja, Noord, Aruba, for Paulus to pay.  He caused all this with his bogus advice to them all to lie.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2007, 10:36:13 PM
Without benefit of back reading, I've come to this conclusion and hope:

If Deepak and Satish didn't actually participate in Natalee's murder itself, the content of the recordings when they discussed the case between themselves, of course wouldn't reveal they did. Therefore, even though there would be strong evidence they participated in the disposal of a body, it would not support the manslaughter charge.

The same evidence would supprt a manslaughter charge against Joran because they could very well have discussed the need to dispose of her body because Joran killed her or that she died due to his actions.

So, there is reason to hope for an optimistic outcome. We have also not heard anything concerning the infiltrator and what he brings to the table, and there is hope in that.

I continue to believe that Hans Mos is above board, and continue to believe that the judges making decisions are yet to prove themselves the same.



I agree with you CBB, very well said.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 01, 2007, 10:37:27 PM
Hurry!  Let's get to page 50, I have a message for Shango in the new thread.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on December 01, 2007, 10:37:28 PM
I do not take seriously anything that Karin Janssen ever did in this flub up of an investigation.  As far as I am concerned, it is all starting anew with Hans Mos in charge.

I think Janssen's every action was motivated by protecting and cooperating with Paulus and catering to his every whim.  Her arrest of so called suspects seemed to be more to protect Joran from any testimony they might could give about him that their own implication in the original crime.

At least we may now know finally what Deepak's car was doing at the Sloot Compound the night Beth arrived just minutes before she got there when he and Joran swear they were gambling away at either the Radisson or the Windham depending on which lie they are telling at the moment.

And it's just exactly what we thought, they were moving the remains most likely and were almost caught red handed by Natalee's mother. 

karin sucks


It says a lot that Mos didn't bother consulting with her. She's damaged goods. Could be some truth to her having an affair with Paulus.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2007, 10:38:37 PM
The NeverEnding Page!

Magnolia, if you are here, did you hear anything at all on the news tonight about the conference between the family and Mos and JQK today?

That's one I would have love to have been a fly on the wall for.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on December 01, 2007, 10:38:43 PM
Hurry!  Let's get to page 50, I have a message for Shango in the new thread.


LOL. Lalas is ready to Tango! Good to see you, Las. :D


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on December 01, 2007, 10:39:32 PM
The NeverEnding Page!

Magnolia, if you are here, did you hear anything at all on the news tonight about the conference between the family and Mos and JQK today?

That's one I would have love to have been a fly on the wall for.


I'm trying to push it over to 50 Anna, but it won't budge.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: merkus on December 01, 2007, 10:39:51 PM
I am new here, but I have followed the board intermittently for a while.  I agree with those who think this prosecutor is the real deal.  I do not think he and his current team are involved or engaged in a cover-up. 

Does anyone know the length of sentence for sexual assault under Dutch law?   Is it typically longer than the more than 3 years requirement for pretrial detention under Dutch law?  Has there been specific reliable reporting about whether the Kalpoes admitted to sexual assault during their first round of detention a couple of years ago (or has the reporting been that they admitted to sexual relations with her with no admission of assault)?

Thanks in advance for any information.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 01, 2007, 10:39:52 PM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub2/1LOCKED.gif)

Please move to NCD# 699

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2409.0


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: San on December 01, 2007, 10:40:22 PM
 :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #698 11/30/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 01, 2007, 10:41:03 PM
I am new here, but I have followed the board intermittently for a while.  I agree with those who think this prosecutor is the real deal.  I do not think he and his current team are involved or engaged in a cover-up. 

Does anyone know the length of sentence for sexual assault under Dutch law?   Is it typically longer than the more than 3 years requirement for pretrial detention under Dutch law?  Has there been specific reliable reporting about whether the Kalpoes admitted to sexual assault during their first round of detention a couple of years ago (or has the reporting been that they admitted to sexual relations with her with no admission of assault)?

Thanks in advance for any information.

Welcome Merkus - I'm going to add your post to the new thread.  I'm about to lock this one.