Scared Monkeys Discussion Forum

Natalee Holloway => LCD Archive => Topic started by: San on December 01, 2007, 06:54:02 PM



Title: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1 - 12/3/2007
Post by: San on December 01, 2007, 06:54:02 PM
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/NH.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 01, 2007, 10:40:26 PM
Hey Shango!  Yes you!  Tell us...

Who is Dirty Hand?  It's time to spit it out...don't be like your buddy Simian and remain silent any longer...email me at cindoal@yahoo.com.  Tell me who he is. I am waiting.  :roll: :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 01, 2007, 10:41:34 PM
Posted by new member Merkus in the previous thread:

I am new here, but I have followed the board intermittently for a while.  I agree with those who think this prosecutor is the real deal.  I do not think he and his current team are involved or engaged in a cover-up. 

Does anyone know the length of sentence for sexual assault under Dutch law?   Is it typically longer than the more than 3 years requirement for pretrial detention under Dutch law?  Has there been specific reliable reporting about whether the Kalpoes admitted to sexual assault during their first round of detention a couple of years ago (or has the reporting been that they admitted to sexual relations with her with no admission of assault)?

Thanks in advance for any information.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on December 01, 2007, 10:43:24 PM
Merkus, welcome! You may want to repost your last post over here. The thread locked right after you posted.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: San on December 01, 2007, 10:43:25 PM
Hi merkus and welcome.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 01, 2007, 10:43:50 PM
Yoo hoo!  Simian!  I am still waiting on the 5th suspect?  Tell me who he is...come on...you can do this...cindoal@yahoo.com. :shock:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on December 01, 2007, 10:44:16 PM
Posted by new member Merkus in the previous thread:

I am new here, but I have followed the board intermittently for a while.  I agree with those who think this prosecutor is the real deal.  I do not think he and his current team are involved or engaged in a cover-up. 

Does anyone know the length of sentence for sexual assault under Dutch law?   Is it typically longer than the more than 3 years requirement for pretrial detention under Dutch law?  Has there been specific reliable reporting about whether the Kalpoes admitted to sexual assault during their first round of detention a couple of years ago (or has the reporting been that they admitted to sexual relations with her with no admission of assault)?

Thanks in advance for any information.

You're always a step ahead, Klaas.  :D


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 01, 2007, 10:44:37 PM
Merkus, welcome! You may want to repost your last post over here. The thread locked right after you posted.

See above, I brought it over  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2007, 10:45:08 PM
Welcome, Merkus,

I don't really know the answer to your question but don't think the Kalpoes would ever admit to any kind of sexual assault, they'd claim consensual at best.  Only on the Skeeters tape do I recall them admitting to sex with Natalee and that is in question.

Good to see new folks posting.  Please feel free to share your thoughts and ideas with us. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Stom on December 01, 2007, 10:50:15 PM
Hey Shango!  Yes you!  Tell us...

Who is Dirty Hand?  It's time to spit it out...don't be like your buddy Simian and remain silent any longer...email me at cindoal@yahoo.com.  Tell me who he is. I am waiting.  :roll: :roll:

Hi Lala's.  For what is worth, Fierljepper at Scrux, says Dirty Hands is Ben Vocking.  He also states that Vocking is not Dutch, but has retired in the Netherlands.  I wonder if this is true and if so, where he's really from.  How are you planning to verify if the real Shango replies to you? 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on December 01, 2007, 10:51:02 PM
Posted by new member Merkus in the previous thread:

I am new here, but I have followed the board intermittently for a while.  I agree with those who think this prosecutor is the real deal.  I do not think he and his current team are involved or engaged in a cover-up. 

Does anyone know the length of sentence for sexual assault under Dutch law?   Is it typically longer than the more than 3 years requirement for pretrial detention under Dutch law?  Has there been specific reliable reporting about whether the Kalpoes admitted to sexual assault during their first round of detention a couple of years ago (or has the reporting been that they admitted to sexual relations with her with no admission of assault)?

Thanks in advance for any information.


Merkus, not sure about sexual assault but we have heard the voluntary manslaughter carries 7-8 (correct me if I'm wrong here) years so would not require pre-trail release like the Kalpoe ruling. I have never heard that the Kalpoes admitted any sexual assault to the police or judges. Steve Cohen did say two of the suspects admitted to having sex with her, but if they had admitted assaulting her forcefully they would have been charged back then, providing the police didn't tear up the statement.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: chelebele on December 01, 2007, 10:53:03 PM
OMG! I've heard you guys mention RU several times, so I thought I'd look it up and see what it was....WHAT is wrong with those people?????? :2doh: Is that where Joran and K2's family and friends go to talk to each other or what??!! It made me sick. I hope none of those idiots ever have a loved one go missing........wow...

Oh, and someone was asking if Magnolia was here.....I haven't seen her, but I'll watch the local Birmingham news at ten and let you guys know if they say anything about the meeting with Mos.


Michele


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 01, 2007, 10:54:23 PM
Hey Shango!  Yes you!  Tell us...

Who is Dirty Hand?  It's time to spit it out...don't be like your buddy Simian and remain silent any longer...email me at cindoal@yahoo.com.  Tell me who he is. I am waiting.  :roll: :roll:

Hi Lala's.  For what is worth, Fierljepper at Scrux, says Dirty Hands is Ben Vocking.  He also states that Vocking is not Dutch, but has retired in the Netherlands.  I wonder if this is true and if so, where he's really from.  How are you planning to verify if the real Shango replies to you? 

I'd bet I could verify it  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 01, 2007, 10:55:27 PM
OMG! I've heard you guys mention RU several times, so I thought I'd look it up and see what it was....WHAT is wrong with those people?????? :2doh: Is that where Joran and K2's family and friends go to talk to each other or what??!! It made me sick. I hope none of those idiots ever have a loved one go missing........wow...

Oh, and someone was asking if Magnolia was here.....I haven't seen her, but I'll watch the local Birmingham news at ten and let you guys know if they say anything about the meeting with Mos.


Michele

Thanks Chele!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 01, 2007, 10:56:03 PM
Foxnews Kalpoes released

Short comment by mos and the shows k2 arriving at home

http://youtube.com/watch?v=Kut3JF9Ho-I

Says he wanted a longer period of time to confront them w/ evidence?? LAY IT ALL OUT BAM...BAM...BAM...there it is. This shit of a little at a time is BULLCRAP!! If he had laid it all out there perhaps they would not have been let go...or am I missing something?? :roll:


Nut ... I am missing it too.

Joran, Deepak and Satish are not talking.  I cannot comprehend why Hans Mos did not lay it all out before the judge ... try his utmost to secure further detentions as well as .... pursue charges.   He is just letting precious time slip by.

Hans Mos promised the judge and the defence attorneys that he would attempt to wrap everything up by December 31, 2005 or ... would dismiss the case..  I was under the impressing that the prosecutor was the victim's advocate.  To heck with accommodating the defence.  In my opinion ... the prosecutor's timeline should be focused on when justice has the best chance for of prevailing for Natalee Holloway.

Janet

++++++++++


http://sendtofriend.abcnews.go.com/GMA/story?id=3912737

Hans Mos
ABC NEWS
November 26, 2007


MOS: I have given the word to the judge and to the lawyers of the brothers that if by the 31st of December, things are not clear, this case will be dismissed. They will be charged if it's a case that we can try in court. And I said the only exception I make on not making it up to the date of the 31st of December, because I had -- I needed a small way out, is if there is very, very heavy and important evidence coming up between now and 31st of December 31.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Stom on December 01, 2007, 10:58:17 PM
Going back to the discussion in the previous thread, I don’t believe Areian (Airean?) de Bie’s comment about Holloway-Twitty connections with the White House is a meaningless, isolated comment.  I think it is tied to the “unofficial” official position of pointing to Mountain Brook, the recent anti-victim, anti-family Amigoe articles and Joe Tacopina’s continued involvement as Joran’s “US attorney”.  

Joran no longer needs a US attorney in the US, because the lawsuits against him were dismissed.  Joran doesn’t need a US attorney in Aruba, because this lawyer is unable to practice law there.  So why does he continue to use Joe Tacopina?  Joe Tacopina loves the opportunity of free media exposure, but I doubt that is all there is to it.  

I often wonder if AHATA and the Van der Sloots have signed a Pactum de Quota Litis with Tacopina, because they foresee an opportunity to initiate proceeding against the Holloway-Twittys, some media outlets and others in an American court of law in which the plaintiffs, AHATA and/or the Van der Sloots, pursue nominal and compensatory damages, respectively.

This may sound far fetched, but i wouldn't put it past them.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on December 01, 2007, 10:59:00 PM
Hey Shango!  Yes you!  Tell us...

Who is Dirty Hand?  It's time to spit it out...don't be like your buddy Simian and remain silent any longer...email me at cindoal@yahoo.com.  Tell me who he is. I am waiting.  :roll: :roll:

Hi Lala's.  For what is worth, Fierljepper at Scrux, says Dirty Hands is Ben Vocking.  He also states that Vocking is not Dutch, but has retired in the Netherlands.  I wonder if this is true and if so, where he's really from.  How are you planning to verify if the real Shango replies to you? 


Not an avid Tangoer, just know enough to be dangerous, but Vocking being dirty hand would not surprise. Without question he overstepped the boundaries of ethics when he took that vacation to help PVDS and his influence with the judges, who he would have close relationships with from his years as head of KIA. His action speaks for itself, he was standing at the door with Wit to make sure they didn't search the main house or grounds.

Vocking needs to be thrown in KIA. I hope Mos will mop up some of the dirty dealers like him after he throws the main perps in prison.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 01, 2007, 11:00:43 PM
Going back to the discussion in the previous thread, I don’t believe Areian (Airean?) de Bie’s comment about Holloway-Twitty connections with the White House is a meaningless, isolated comment.  I think it is tied to the “unofficial” official position of pointing to Mountain Brook, the recent anti-victim, anti-family Amigoe articles and Joe Tacopina’s continued involvement as Joran’s “US attorney”.  

Joran no longer needs a US attorney in the US, because the lawsuits against him were dismissed.  Joran doesn’t need a US attorney in Aruba, because this lawyer is unable to practice law there.  So why does he continue to use Joe Tacopina?  Joe Tacopina loves the opportunity of free media exposure, but I doubt that is all there is to it.  

I often wonder if AHATA and the Van der Sloots have signed a Pactum de Quota Litis with Tacopina, because they foresee an opportunity to initiate proceeding against the Holloway-Twittys, some media outlets and others in an American court of law in which the plaintiffs, AHATA and/or the Van der Sloots, pursue nominal and compensatory damages, respectively.

This may sound far fetched, but i wouldn't put it past them.


If they did that they might as well drop a bomb on that island because the end result will be the same. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 01, 2007, 11:07:51 PM
Going back to the discussion in the previous thread, I don’t believe Areian (Airean?) de Bie’s comment about Holloway-Twitty connections with the White House is a meaningless, isolated comment.  I think it is tied to the “unofficial” official position of pointing to Mountain Brook, the recent anti-victim, anti-family Amigoe articles and Joe Tacopina’s continued involvement as Joran’s “US attorney”. 

Joran no longer needs a US attorney in the US, because the lawsuits against him were dismissed.  Joran doesn’t need a US attorney in Aruba, because this lawyer is unable to practice law there.  So why does he continue to use Joe Tacopina?  Joe Tacopina loves the opportunity of free media exposure, but I doubt that is all there is to it. 

I often wonder if AHATA and the Van der Sloots have signed a Pactum de Quota Litis with Tacopina, because they foresee an opportunity to initiate proceeding against the Holloway-Twittys, some media outlets and others in an American court of law in which the plaintiffs, AHATA and/or the Van der Sloots, pursue nominal and compensatory damages, respectively.

This may sound far fetched, but i wouldn't put it past them.


If they did that they might as well drop a bomb on that island because the end result will be the same. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on December 01, 2007, 11:09:07 PM
Going back to the discussion in the previous thread, I don’t believe Areian (Airean?) de Bie’s comment about Holloway-Twitty connections with the White House is a meaningless, isolated comment.  I think it is tied to the “unofficial” official position of pointing to Mountain Brook, the recent anti-victim, anti-family Amigoe articles and Joe Tacopina’s continued involvement as Joran’s “US attorney”.  

Joran no longer needs a US attorney in the US, because the lawsuits against him were dismissed.  Joran doesn’t need a US attorney in Aruba, because this lawyer is unable to practice law there.  So why does he continue to use Joe Tacopina?  Joe Tacopina loves the opportunity of free media exposure, but I doubt that is all there is to it.  

I often wonder if AHATA and the Van der Sloots have signed a Pactum de Quota Litis with Tacopina, because they foresee an opportunity to initiate proceeding against the Holloway-Twittys, some media outlets and others in an American court of law in which the plaintiffs, AHATA and/or the Van der Sloots, pursue nominal and compensatory damages, respectively.

This may sound far fetched, but i wouldn't put it past them.



Not far-fetched at all, Stom. Why is Tacopina meddling in the Aruban court system? He must be getting paid, as you say his job has already been done in the US.

You do know Antonio Carlo is on the board selection committee of AHATA? That's right, Paulus van der Sloot's business partner. Lends credibility to your theory.

AHATA and ATA have made some terrible decisions throught this ordeal, but none would be worse than suing Natalee's family. They would be treading on dangerous ground secretly backing the van der Sloots. If that ever came out it would put the final nail in their coffin.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2007, 11:09:45 PM
The Prosecutor in Dutch law is supposed to be neutral, not an advocate for either the victim or the defendant or suspect but a purveyor of justice.

HA!  That's a good one for considering KJanssen in the role of suspect advocate instead of for the victim at all.  There seems to be no one who is an advocate for victims.  That's why sixteen years old girls have to move away after being gang raped with the evidence on the cell phone and internet messages of the culprits!  No crimes against society seem to exist in these regards and unless the victim fights for themselves, they basically have no real voice other than this sham of a DA whose position is supposed to remain neutral.

Even that would be an improvement over Janssen who was clearly an advocate for the defense.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 01, 2007, 11:11:18 PM
On many occasions, Dan Riehl mentioned that Paulus not only wants to sue all stated by Stom, but bloggers as well.  Tacopino was obviously the attorney who put this in his head, because it was about the time that Rizzo came up in the conversation.  I am sure Observor and Anna will recall that as well.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Stom on December 01, 2007, 11:12:28 PM
Hey Shango!  Yes you!  Tell us...

Who is Dirty Hand?  It's time to spit it out...don't be like your buddy Simian and remain silent any longer...email me at cindoal@yahoo.com.  Tell me who he is. I am waiting.  :roll: :roll:

Hi Lala's.  For what is worth, Fierljepper at Scrux, says Dirty Hands is Ben Vocking.  He also states that Vocking is not Dutch, but has retired in the Netherlands.  I wonder if this is true and if so, where he's really from.  How are you planning to verify if the real Shango replies to you? 

I'd bet I could verify it  :wink:

I bet you could if Shangie really lives in Florida and he writes to you.  But given that he only posted for 4/5 days, I always believed he was temporarily in Florida, and when back in Aruba mutated into two different "cells":  one born in Aruba to Dutch parents, a member of AHATA, with permanent residence in the USA, the other born in the Netherlands, member of AHATA too, with residence in Aruba.

Best of luck Lala's... you have the best verifier available.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Spock on December 01, 2007, 11:13:12 PM
Posted by new member Merkus in the previous thread:

I am new here, but I have followed the board intermittently for a while.  I agree with those who think this prosecutor is the real deal.  I do not think he and his current team are involved or engaged in a cover-up. 

Does anyone know the length of sentence for sexual assault under Dutch law?   Is it typically longer than the more than 3 years requirement for pretrial detention under Dutch law?  Has there been specific reliable reporting about whether the Kalpoes admitted to sexual assault during their first round of detention a couple of years ago (or has the reporting been that they admitted to sexual relations with her with no admission of assault)?

Thanks in advance for any information.


Merkus, not sure about sexual assault but we have heard the voluntary manslaughter carries 7-8 (correct me if I'm wrong here) years so would not require pre-trail release like the Kalpoe ruling. I have never heard that the Kalpoes admitted any sexual assault to the police or judges. Steve Cohen did say two of the suspects admitted to having sex with her, but if they had admitted assaulting her forcefully they would have been charged back then, providing the police didn't tear up the statement.

Deepak stated in an email to a friend of his on that sunday or monday morning, that "the girl had put her hands down his pants". he was confronted with this in an interrogation and said he "made that up".  


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 01, 2007, 11:14:58 PM
Posted by new member Merkus in the previous thread:

I am new here, but I have followed the board intermittently for a while.  I agree with those who think this prosecutor is the real deal.  I do not think he and his current team are involved or engaged in a cover-up. 

Does anyone know the length of sentence for sexual assault under Dutch law?   Is it typically longer than the more than 3 years requirement for pretrial detention under Dutch law?  Has there been specific reliable reporting about whether the Kalpoes admitted to sexual assault during their first round of detention a couple of years ago (or has the reporting been that they admitted to sexual relations with her with no admission of assault)?

Thanks in advance for any information.


Merkus, not sure about sexual assault but we have heard the voluntary manslaughter carries 7-8 (correct me if I'm wrong here) years so would not require pre-trail release like the Kalpoe ruling. I have never heard that the Kalpoes admitted any sexual assault to the police or judges. Steve Cohen did say two of the suspects admitted to having sex with her, but if they had admitted assaulting her forcefully they would have been charged back then, providing the police didn't tear up the statement.

Deepak stated in an email to a friend of his on that sunday or monday morning, that "the girl had put her hands down his pants". he was confronted with this in an interrogation and said he "made that up".  

I am not sure of the particular Caribbean paper that ran it, but before they were arrested, either of them, they all three said they had had consensual sex with Natalee, and if memory serves, that was also stated to the Mt Brook party.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 01, 2007, 11:15:55 PM
Hey Shango!  Yes you!  Tell us...

Who is Dirty Hand?  It's time to spit it out...don't be like your buddy Simian and remain silent any longer...email me at cindoal@yahoo.com.  Tell me who he is. I am waiting.  :roll: :roll:

Hi Lala's.  For what is worth, Fierljepper at Scrux, says Dirty Hands is Ben Vocking.  He also states that Vocking is not Dutch, but has retired in the Netherlands.  I wonder if this is true and if so, where he's really from.  How are you planning to verify if the real Shango replies to you? 

I'd bet I could verify it  :wink:

I bet you could if Shangie really lives in Florida and he writes to you.  But given that he only posted for 4/5 days, I always believed he was temporarily in Florida, and when back in Aruba mutated into two different "cells":  one born in Aruba to Dutch parents, a member of AHATA, with permanent residence in the USA, the other born in the Netherlands, member of AHATA too, with residence in Aruba.

Best of luck Lala's... you have the best verifier available.

STom - But I know what email addresses Shango and Simian used.  IF they used the same and especially if the IP was the same we could more or less assume a match.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2007, 11:16:26 PM
On many occasions, Dan Riehl mentioned that Paulus not only wants to sue all stated by Stom, but bloggers as well.  Tacopino was obviously the attorney who put this in his head, because it was about the time that Rizzo came up in the conversation.  I am sure Observor and Anna will recall that as well.

Yes, in their fantasy world, these people seem to hear about somebody receiving $3 million from McDonald's over spilled coffee and so they think anything is possible in the good old U.S. of A. 

Deepak's suit is the result of this kind of magical thinking I do believe and must be financed by something like AHATA.  Well, this is really going to throw that in the crapper because how can he sue Dr. Phil when the Aruban Prosecutor is saying worse things about Deepak than Dr. Phil did?

And now I wonder if AHATA will pay for the costs that will result from this and the sanctions Dr. Phil is asking for from this suit.  Will they pay that or stick the Kalpoes with it or what exactly?  Just totally default and have outstanding judgment against the Kalpoes for twenty years?

But I do think Deepak's suit was a sort of trial balloon for further actions and the rest of those jerks trying to get rich off the crimes of their devil spawn.  Doesn't get much lower than that.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 01, 2007, 11:17:29 PM
Hey Shango!  Yes you!  Tell us...

Who is Dirty Hand?  It's time to spit it out...don't be like your buddy Simian and remain silent any longer...email me at cindoal@yahoo.com.  Tell me who he is. I am waiting.  :roll: :roll:

Hi Lala's.  For what is worth, Fierljepper at Scrux, says Dirty Hands is Ben Vocking.  He also states that Vocking is not Dutch, but has retired in the Netherlands.  I wonder if this is true and if so, where he's really from.  How are you planning to verify if the real Shango replies to you? 

I know who Shango is. :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 01, 2007, 11:17:58 PM
Posted by new member Merkus in the previous thread:

I am new here, but I have followed the board intermittently for a while.  I agree with those who think this prosecutor is the real deal.  I do not think he and his current team are involved or engaged in a cover-up. 

Does anyone know the length of sentence for sexual assault under Dutch law?   Is it typically longer than the more than 3 years requirement for pretrial detention under Dutch law?  Has there been specific reliable reporting about whether the Kalpoes admitted to sexual assault during their first round of detention a couple of years ago (or has the reporting been that they admitted to sexual relations with her with no admission of assault)?

Thanks in advance for any information.


Merkus, not sure about sexual assault but we have heard the voluntary manslaughter carries 7-8 (correct me if I'm wrong here) years so would not require pre-trail release like the Kalpoe ruling. I have never heard that the Kalpoes admitted any sexual assault to the police or judges. Steve Cohen did say two of the suspects admitted to having sex with her, but if they had admitted assaulting her forcefully they would have been charged back then, providing the police didn't tear up the statement.

Deepak stated in an email to a friend of his on that sunday or monday morning, that "the girl had put her hands down his pants". he was confronted with this in an interrogation and said he "made that up".  

I am not sure of the particular Caribbean paper that ran it, but before they were arrested, either of them, they all three said they had had consensual sex with Natalee, and if memory serves, that was also stated to the Mt Brook party.

It was AM Digital and if you hold on a bit I'll get a copy for you


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Magnolia on December 01, 2007, 11:19:36 PM
OMG! I've heard you guys mention RU several times, so I thought I'd look it up and see what it was....WHAT is wrong with those people?????? :2doh: Is that where Joran and K2's family and friends go to talk to each other or what??!! It made me sick. I hope none of those idiots ever have a loved one go missing........wow...

Oh, and someone was asking if Magnolia was here.....I haven't seen her, but I'll watch the local Birmingham news at ten and let you guys know if they say anything about the meeting with Mos.


Michele

Evening all!
I just got here.  I am fearful that the reporter on Aruba has been pulled back to AL.
Just speculating...but it has sorta looked that way.  I haven't heard anything all day, but must admit that I have not watched anything but football.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on December 01, 2007, 11:19:37 PM
On many occasions, Dan Riehl mentioned that Paulus not only wants to sue all stated by Stom, but bloggers as well.  Tacopino was obviously the attorney who put this in his head, because it was about the time that Rizzo came up in the conversation.  I am sure Observor and Anna will recall that as well.


Tell him he will need to provide discovery (see Dr. Phil) and appear on the witness stand, and taking the Fifth is out in civil trials. He is off on a bad foot, the Dutch court ruled he is a liar and Hans Mos just said he is certain Paulus is involved.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Stom on December 01, 2007, 11:21:19 PM
Going back to the discussion in the previous thread, I don’t believe Areian (Airean?) de Bie’s comment about Holloway-Twitty connections with the White House is a meaningless, isolated comment.  I think it is tied to the “unofficial” official position of pointing to Mountain Brook, the recent anti-victim, anti-family Amigoe articles and Joe Tacopina’s continued involvement as Joran’s “US attorney”.  

Joran no longer needs a US attorney in the US, because the lawsuits against him were dismissed.  Joran doesn’t need a US attorney in Aruba, because this lawyer is unable to practice law there.  So why does he continue to use Joe Tacopina?  Joe Tacopina loves the opportunity of free media exposure, but I doubt that is all there is to it.  

I often wonder if AHATA and the Van der Sloots have signed a Pactum de Quota Litis with Tacopina, because they foresee an opportunity to initiate proceeding against the Holloway-Twittys, some media outlets and others in an American court of law in which the plaintiffs, AHATA and/or the Van der Sloots, pursue nominal and compensatory damages, respectively.

This may sound far fetched, but i wouldn't put it past them.


If they did that they might as well drop a bomb on that island because the end result will be the same. 

I agree, but I think it is possible than someone may have agreed to procure compensation eventually, under the assumption that sooner or later, JvdS would be deleted from the suspect list and the case would be dismissed.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 01, 2007, 11:21:39 PM
The real Shango is not in Florida... he never was...only his hands were there to type the riddles...do you guys think I just read all that crap and not give it any thought?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: chelebele on December 01, 2007, 11:22:28 PM
OMG! I've heard you guys mention RU several times, so I thought I'd look it up and see what it was....WHAT is wrong with those people?????? :2doh: Is that where Joran and K2's family and friends go to talk to each other or what??!! It made me sick. I hope none of those idiots ever have a loved one go missing........wow...

Oh, and someone was asking if Magnolia was here.....I haven't seen her, but I'll watch the local Birmingham news at ten and let you guys know if they say anything about the meeting with Mos.


Michele


Evening all!
I just got here.  I am fearful that the reporter on Aruba has been pulled back to AL.
Just speculating...but it has sorta looked that way.  I haven't heard anything all day, but must admit that I have not watched anything but football.

Hey Magnolia! I think you're right...local news only reported on K2's being released, nothing about Beth or Dave.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on December 01, 2007, 11:23:27 PM
On many occasions, Dan Riehl mentioned that Paulus not only wants to sue all stated by Stom, but bloggers as well.  Tacopino was obviously the attorney who put this in his head, because it was about the time that Rizzo came up in the conversation.  I am sure Observor and Anna will recall that as well.

Yes, in their fantasy world, these people seem to hear about somebody receiving $3 million from McDonald's over spilled coffee and so they think anything is possible in the good old U.S. of A. 

Deepak's suit is the result of this kind of magical thinking I do believe and must be financed by something like AHATA.  Well, this is really going to throw that in the crapper because how can he sue Dr. Phil when the Aruban Prosecutor is saying worse things about Deepak than Dr. Phil did?

And now I wonder if AHATA will pay for the costs that will result from this and the sanctions Dr. Phil is asking for from this suit.  Will they pay that or stick the Kalpoes with it or what exactly?  Just totally default and have outstanding judgment against the Kalpoes for twenty years?

But I do think Deepak's suit was a sort of trial balloon for further actions and the rest of those jerks trying to get rich off the crimes of their devil spawn.  Doesn't get much lower than that.

.


There are very strong suspicions AHATA is behind the Kalpoe lawsuit. The whole idea started in the Aruba business community.

If they aren't behind it I would suggest Deepak and Satish will spend the rest of their lives paying attorney fees.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 01, 2007, 11:26:07 PM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/AMDig060405sex.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on December 01, 2007, 11:26:47 PM

If they did that they might as well drop a bomb on that island because the end result will be the same. 

I agree, but I think it is possible than someone may have agreed to procure compensation eventually, under the assumption that sooner or later, JvdS would be deleted from the suspect list and the case would be dismissed.


Intelligence has never been one of their virtues.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2007, 11:27:19 PM
If anyone should be filing lawsuits, it is the hapless tourists lied to about the lack of crime in Aruba when we see it constantly in their own newspapers.

Every tourist who has gone there in the past five years has likely been told that whopper about no crime, one murder in last twenty years or some outrageous lie about how safe Aruba is.

A class action lawsuit for false advertising would be more appropriate than trying to sue bloggers or other people for defaming a named suspect in killing a tourist.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Stom on December 01, 2007, 11:28:04 PM
The real Shango is not in Florida... he never was...only his hands were there to type the riddles...do you guys think I just read all that crap and not give it any thought?

It has been repeated over and over that he posted from FL, but I accept it's possible that he did have a VPN, posted from a provider outside of the US with a server in Florida or wrote the comments in conjunction with someone that was in Florida at the time.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Observer on December 01, 2007, 11:30:07 PM
On many occasions, Dan Riehl mentioned that Paulus not only wants to sue all stated by Stom, but bloggers as well.  Tacopino was obviously the attorney who put this in his head, because it was about the time that Rizzo came up in the conversation.  I am sure Observor and Anna will recall that as well.


There are very strong suspicions AHATA is behind the Kalpoe lawsuit. The whole idea started in the Aruba business community.

If they aren't behind it I would suggest Deepak and Satish will spend the rest of their lives paying attorney fees.


Why would AHATA risk enormous amounts of money on the Kalpoe Brothers? Are they paying for Joe Tacopina's huge Attorney costs also?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on December 01, 2007, 11:31:54 PM
If anyone should be filing lawsuits, it is the hapless tourists lied to about the lack of crime in Aruba when we see it constantly in their own newspapers.

Every tourist who has gone there in the past five years has likely been told that whopper about no crime, one murder in last twenty years or some outrageous lie about how safe Aruba is.

A class action lawsuit for false advertising would be more appropriate than trying to sue bloggers or other people for defaming a named suspect in killing a tourist.


Or perhaps the Aruban people should launch a class action lawsuit for the incredibly shitty job their governemnt did handling Natalee's case.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 01, 2007, 11:34:44 PM
It might be they are trying to recoup the loss to tourism by suing, but it will have the reverse effect on tourism for people will fear going there out of fear they might be sued about anything that happens, or if they are not sued, they will die at the end of a rope with their hand in their pocket.  Someone is giving AHATA some very bad advice or is intentionally trying to bankrupt Aruba.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on December 01, 2007, 11:35:02 PM
On many occasions, Dan Riehl mentioned that Paulus not only wants to sue all stated by Stom, but bloggers as well.  Tacopino was obviously the attorney who put this in his head, because it was about the time that Rizzo came up in the conversation.  I am sure Observor and Anna will recall that as well.


There are very strong suspicions AHATA is behind the Kalpoe lawsuit. The whole idea started in the Aruba business community.

If they aren't behind it I would suggest Deepak and Satish will spend the rest of their lives paying attorney fees.


Why would AHATA risk enormous amounts of money on the Kalpoe Brothers? Are they paying for Joe Tacopina's huge Attorney costs also?


To them it would be a little victory to soothe their little minds. Remember, they blame Natalee and her family along with Dr. Phil for all their woes. They could hold this up to their people as proof that all the big bad boogers are in the US.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2007, 11:39:33 PM
On many occasions, Dan Riehl mentioned that Paulus not only wants to sue all stated by Stom, but bloggers as well.  Tacopino was obviously the attorney who put this in his head, because it was about the time that Rizzo came up in the conversation.  I am sure Observor and Anna will recall that as well.


There are very strong suspicions AHATA is behind the Kalpoe lawsuit. The whole idea started in the Aruba business community.

If they aren't behind it I would suggest Deepak and Satish will spend the rest of their lives paying attorney fees.


Why would AHATA risk enormous amounts of money on the Kalpoe Brothers? Are they paying for Joe Tacopina's huge Attorney costs also?


To them it would be a little victory to soothe their little minds. Remember, they blame Natalee and her family along with Dr. Phil for all their woes. They could hold this up to their people as proof that all the big bad boogers are in the US.

Not to mention getting their mitts on at least some sizable portion of any award given the Kalpoes.  They are foolish enough to think they might actually get  $800 million for the reputation of these two bums who would likely never see that much money in their entire miserable lives no matter what they did.

Oh, I know, Satish has had his career as a brain surgeon damaged by all this but aside from that how delusional is it to think their reputations worth even fifty cents let alone that amount.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on December 01, 2007, 11:40:43 PM
It might be they are trying to recoup the loss to tourism by suing, but it will have the reverse effect on tourism for people will fear going there out of fear they might be sued about anything that happens, or if they are not sued, they will die at the end of a rope with their hand in their pocket.  Someone is giving AHATA some very bad advice or is intentionally trying to bankrupt Aruba.


They have been living off bad advice since day one. Who is influencing them, Antonio Carlo? Don't they think having Joran van der Sloot's lawyer, Paulus' business partner, on their advisory board isn't necessarily a good idea? Did that ever occur to them?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 01, 2007, 11:41:54 PM
It might be they are trying to recoup the loss to tourism by suing, but it will have the reverse effect on tourism for people will fear going there out of fear they might be sued about anything that happens, or if they are not sued, they will die at the end of a rope with their hand in their pocket.  Someone is giving AHATA some very bad advice or is intentionally trying to bankrupt Aruba.

Yes, they have wasted a lot of money and got nothing in return but heartache. LOLOLOL Laughing again. Fools!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 01, 2007, 11:47:59 PM
Time for me to hug Nemo.....


Still waiting to Shango to call...waiting...waiting...

Simian, old buddy, let me know....I am waiting for you too. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Spock on December 01, 2007, 11:49:55 PM
From the article that Klassend posted:

" the three young men, declared that they had taken Natalee to that area, had sex with her and then dropped her at the holiday inn resort"

The problem with that newspaper article is that we dont have any declarations in hand that support it. If true, it does provide a motive for a killing and the hiding of the body


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Stom on December 01, 2007, 11:58:59 PM
On many occasions, Dan Riehl mentioned that Paulus not only wants to sue all stated by Stom, but bloggers as well.  Tacopino was obviously the attorney who put this in his head, because it was about the time that Rizzo came up in the conversation.  I am sure Observor and Anna will recall that as well.


There are very strong suspicions AHATA is behind the Kalpoe lawsuit. The whole idea started in the Aruba business community.

If they aren't behind it I would suggest Deepak and Satish will spend the rest of their lives paying attorney fees.


Why would AHATA risk enormous amounts of money on the Kalpoe Brothers? Are they paying for Joe Tacopina's huge Attorney costs also?

I don't think AHATA is risking anything...the lawyers are taking the chance.  If they collect, they keep a hefty percentage of the indemnification.  This percentage is calculated based on the possibilities of recuperating damages. The harder the materialization of collection is, the higher their share.  And on the mean time, they receive as palliative compensation other benefits such as free media exposure. 

For someone like Tacopina, "Any Publicity is Good Publicity".  Most lawyers base their credentials on professional achievements.  Tacopina bases his on opinions from media outlets and personalities, as if he were on the Best Seller on the NY Times.  Check his site http://www.tacopinalaw.com .  He markets the Tacopina name as if it were a commercial good, a brandname.  He wants media time, to exploit and publicize the Tacopina Trademark. 

If he eventually sues the H-Ts and or other parties on behalf of the Van der Sloots or AHATA, he will not care about the consequences for his clients, because even if the legal actions backfires, they would have served their end, which is to encourage people to talk about him, to become better known.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: robots on December 02, 2007, 12:03:40 AM
perhaps Mos is hoping that Natalee is found with the search boats before the 31st

seems like that may be what he is hoping for because the BUGS might have overheard something that will link the suspects to something that she is either buried with.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: thecuz on December 02, 2007, 12:05:05 AM
OMG! I've heard you guys mention RU several times, so I thought I'd look it up and see what it was....WHAT is wrong with those people?????? :2doh: Is that where Joran and K2's family and friends go to talk to each other or what??!! It made me sick. I hope none of those idiots ever have a loved one go missing........wow...

Oh, and someone was asking if Magnolia was here.....I haven't seen her, but I'll watch the local Birmingham news at ten and let you guys know if they say anything about the meeting with Mos.


Michele

Evening all!
I just got here.  I am fearful that the reporter on Aruba has been pulled back to AL.
Just speculating...but it has sorta looked that way.  I haven't heard anything all day, but must admit that I have not watched anything but football.





chelebele....i am sorry nobody warned you beforehand......i have been there a couple of times in the past but refuse to subject myself to the hate the resides there....just totally depresses me that there are actual human beings that have no empathy and are just down right spiteful!

magnolia....i have appreciated your birmingham updates! so, i assume nobody knows if beth,john q and dave left today after their marathon session....i hate the thought that beth has to spend the night there one more night after the kick to the gut she has had to take!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: merkus on December 02, 2007, 12:09:23 AM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/AMDig060405sex.jpg)

Klaasend -- Thanks for posting this.  I knew I had heard somewhere that there were reportedly some admissions by the 3 about sex at some point. 

Here are a few more questions from a new guy --

In the recorded conversation in the police van, Joran says something about helping the 2 of them with the choller, which I think is a drug dealer.  What's the speculation on what Joran meant by that?

What about the reference by Deepak or Satish in the same transcript that "Freddie knows what happened to the girl, if anyone does" and "Freddie needs to tell the truth," or something like that?

I spent some time with all of the Shango / Simian stuff a couple of years ago.  I am sure there are a lot of posts about the 2 of them, and I will go back and look for them, but can someone give a really short summary of the state of current opinion re: who they are and why they were posting all of that stuff?

Thanks.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Magnolia on December 02, 2007, 12:09:58 AM
perhaps Mos is hoping that Natalee is found with the search boats before the 31st

seems like that may be what he is hoping for because the BUGS might have overheard something that will link the suspects to something that she is either buried with.


That is what I have been thinking, Robots.  I also think that is why he is waitig to file charges.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Magnolia on December 02, 2007, 12:15:30 AM
OMG! I've heard you guys mention RU several times, so I thought I'd look it up and see what it was....WHAT is wrong with those people?????? :2doh: Is that where Joran and K2's family and friends go to talk to each other or what??!! It made me sick. I hope none of those idiots ever have a loved one go missing........wow...

Oh, and someone was asking if Magnolia was here.....I haven't seen her, but I'll watch the local Birmingham news at ten and let you guys know if they say anything about the meeting with Mos.


Michele

Evening all!
I just got here.  I am fearful that the reporter on Aruba has been pulled back to AL.
Just speculating...but it has sorta looked that way.  I haven't heard anything all day, but must admit that I have not watched anything but football.





chelebele....i am sorry nobody warned you beforehand......i have been there a couple of times in the past but refuse to subject myself to the hate the resides there....just totally depresses me that there are actual human beings that have no empathy and are just down right spiteful!

magnolia....i have appreciated your birmingham updates! so, i assume nobody knows if beth,john q and dave left today after their marathon session....i hate the thought that beth has to spend the night there one more night after the kick to the gut she has had to take!


There was nothing new on the local news tonight.  Some footage of Satish getting out of a car at home...looked like it was borrowed from CNN to me.
All about the cheerleaders killed in the car accident.  That was in my tiny little town.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: robots on December 02, 2007, 12:19:19 AM
it also is getting clearer that the prosecutor is going after joran in a big way
and that K2 will get whats coming to them for hiding a body.

if they get joran they get K2

if they dont get joran they wont get K2

at least thats what i think

i also think Mos has PLAN "B" ready to go into action


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 02, 2007, 12:20:37 AM
Merkus, the choller remark has always bothered me.  It is my thinking that Paulus has something on the Kalpoes that he holds over them like a guillotine and after reading this statement, I think it has something to do with a choller.  Who knows?  Maybe they "ran over" a choller, and Paulus represented them or Joran lied for them about it.  I think for anyone who lives in Aruba, this might be a good project to look into.  Joran seems to imply someone was run over by a car that involved either DK or SK, and it is not far from that statement he mentions the choller, and then goes back to accusing them of getting his father into this after all he has done for them.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on December 02, 2007, 12:23:18 AM
On many occasions, Dan Riehl mentioned that Paulus not only wants to sue all stated by Stom, but bloggers as well.  Tacopino was obviously the attorney who put this in his head, because it was about the time that Rizzo came up in the conversation.  I am sure Observor and Anna will recall that as well.


There are very strong suspicions AHATA is behind the Kalpoe lawsuit. The whole idea started in the Aruba business community.

If they aren't behind it I would suggest Deepak and Satish will spend the rest of their lives paying attorney fees.


Why would AHATA risk enormous amounts of money on the Kalpoe Brothers? Are they paying for Joe Tacopina's huge Attorney costs also?

I don't think AHATA is risking anything...the lawyers are taking the chance.  If they collect, they keep a hefty percentage of the indemnification.  This percentage is calculated based on the possibilities of recuperating damages. The harder the materialization of collection is, the higher their share.  And on the mean time, they receive as palliative compensation other benefits such as free media exposure. 

For someone like Tacopina, "Any Publicity is Good Publicity".  Most lawyers base their credentials on professional achievements.  Tacopina bases his on opinions from media outlets and personalities, as if he were on the Best Seller on the NY Times.  Check his site http://www.tacopinalaw.com .  He markets the Tacopina name as if it were a commercial good, a brandname.  He wants media time, to exploit and publicize the Tacopina Trademark. 

If he eventually sues the H-Ts and or other parties on behalf of the Van der Sloots or AHATA, he will not care about the consequences for his clients, because even if the legal actions backfires, they would have served their end, which is to encourage people to talk about him, to become better known.

:shock:  I had never looked at his sight before!  It DOES read like a Best Seller from NY times commercial.  But scariest of ALL!  It quotes GQ magazine calling him "Hottest Attorney"! :roll:  Did I say  :shock:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: dennisintn on December 02, 2007, 12:32:01 AM

try www.smdginc.com if you'd like to see who's running the p.r. for aruba's anti-holloway program.  it's steve cohen's group that advises political candidates in the u.s.  dirty politics is their specialty.  check out some of the campaigns for some of their clients they have listed.  imo, if you can dig deep enough you might find a taco connection.
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Observer on December 02, 2007, 12:32:31 AM
I have a hard time believing Tacopina's entire law firm is doing this for free and the Chicago Attorneys are working Pro Bono..They would have to be deaf dumb and blind to take on Dr.Phil especially after Steve Cohen stated on the same show at least two of the boys had sex with Natalee. We also have the famous PI out of chicago that worked for the Van Der Sloots about the same time Posner admitted hiring his own Investigators. Something is all too fishy about all of this and I dont think these extremely expensive Lawyers would risk anything on these 3 lying punks.IMO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on December 02, 2007, 12:32:47 AM
WTF?  Is this a joke or am I really this tired....  :-?   On his web page is a pdf, by one of our own MOnkeys????  A seemingly more valid advertisement?

http://www.tacopinalaw.com/pdfs/JoeTacopino.GQ.pdf


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 02, 2007, 12:33:04 AM
G'night, Monkeys.  Keep the faith, keep the blog going, keep your chins up and keep Natalee and her family in your prayers.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on December 02, 2007, 12:37:58 AM
Klaas?  Help me out here....   I've had a long day, moving a friend on my birthday and I'm either going crazy or missing a bad joke......


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Spock on December 02, 2007, 12:42:09 AM
I agree that Mos is the "real deal", but there are limitations to what he will do.

1. He (his team) will attempt to put together a case to try the suspects.

2. However, that does not mean he will put them on trial.

3. He will not coverup any evidence he finds.

4. However, he will not expose the coverup he knows has already taken place.

5. He will not do anything that will place another prosecutor, policeman, or judicial authority in jeopardy.

Mos has been given a difficult "nut to crack", he has been asked to prosecute the suspects but not to prosecute the coverup by law enforcement and the politicians. If he is going to crack the case, he will need to do both. Keep in mind, in the end, its the politicians he has to please first. The netherlands do not want the coverup exposed and he has been told that. IMO



 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2007, 12:43:24 AM
I have a hard time believing Tacopina's entire law firm is doing this for free and the Chicago Attorneys are working Pro Bono..They would have to be deaf dumb and blind to take on Dr.Phil especially after Steve Cohen stated on the same show at least two of the boys had sex with Natalee. We also have the famous PI out of chicago that worked for the Van Der Sloots about the same time Posner admitted hiring his own Investigators. Something is all too fishy about all of this and I dont think these extremely expensive Lawyers would risk anything on these 3 lying punks.IMO

http://scaredmonkeys.com/2006/03/14/joe-tacopina-meets-the-no-spin-zone-and-crumbles/

Members of the family along with supporters of the Van der Sloot family have made contributions to their defense.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: robots on December 02, 2007, 12:46:20 AM
I agree that Kos is the "real deal", but there are limitations to what he will do.

1. He (his team) will attempt to put together a case to try the suspects.

2. However, that does not mean he will put them on trial.

3. He will not coverup any evidence he finds.

4. However, he will not expose the coverup he knows has already taken place.

5. He will not do anything that will place another prosecutor, policeman, or judicial authority in jeopardy.

Kos has been given a difficult "nut to crack", he has been asked to prosecute the suspects but not to prosecute the coverup by law enforcement and the politicians. If he is going to crack the case, he will need to do both. Keep in mind, in the end, its the politicians he has to please first. The netherlands do not want the coverup exposed and he has been told that. IMO

i think you are right, and yet IF he has the GUTS to do number #3 then everything will fall into place. IF he doesnt do #3 then nothing will happen
Mos - BE A MAN and DO IT  :cool:

 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Anna on December 02, 2007, 12:47:36 AM
In my opinion, Posner's Private Investigator and Paulus are the same one = Earnie "Dirtytricks" Rizzio, now deceased.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2007, 12:47:57 AM
WTF?  Is this a joke or am I really this tired....  :-?   On his web page is a pdf, by one of our own MOnkeys????  A seemingly more valid advertisement?

http://www.tacopinalaw.com/pdfs/JoeTacopino.GQ.pdf

Are you are referring to the writer of the article in GQ magazine (which is what the PDF is)?  Not sure what you mean by one of our own Monkeys since I know Monkeys by their nicknames  :wink: And we don't give out "real life" names here.  I'm sure there is more than one person in the USA with that name.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: San on December 02, 2007, 12:51:06 AM
Klaas?  Help me out here....   I've had a long day, moving a friend on my birthday and I'm either going crazy or missing a bad joke......

Happy Birthday Dihannah.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on December 02, 2007, 12:51:43 AM
WTF?  Is this a joke or am I really this tired....  :-?   On his web page is a pdf, by one of our own MOnkeys????  A seemingly more valid advertisement?

http://www.tacopinalaw.com/pdfs/JoeTacopino.GQ.pdf

Are you are referring to the writer of the article in GQ magazine (which is what the PDF is)?  Not sure what you mean by one of our own Monkeys since I know Monkeys by their nicknames  :wink: And we don't give out "real life" names here.  I'm sure there is more than one person in the USA with that name.

Then I better email you.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Spock on December 02, 2007, 12:52:12 AM
Its getting late, maybe someone can edit the typo's in my post  (1,2,3,4,5 and his name)

Thank You


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: robots on December 02, 2007, 12:54:32 AM
MOS needs to do his job as ugly as it is


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Observer on December 02, 2007, 12:56:08 AM

http://scaredmonkeys.com/2006/03/14/joe-tacopina-meets-the-no-spin-zone-and-crumbles/

Members of the family along with supporters of the Van der Sloot family have made contributions to their defense.


I would love to see who contributed to that fund..Same donors to the Kalpoes also? Must be some enormous donations :wink:


So much for the case being pro bono as originally advertised. It would appear that “supporters of the family” have made contributions to the defense fund. Wouldn’t everyone want to get a look at that list of donors?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Puzzler on December 02, 2007, 12:56:21 AM
perhaps Mos is hoping that Natalee is found with the search boats before the 31st

seems like that may be what he is hoping for because the BUGS might have overheard something that will link the suspects to something that she is either buried with.


 :shock:  The tennis shoe(s)??  :shock:  :P



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on December 02, 2007, 12:58:18 AM
Klaas, email sent to gmail.   Please explain?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: robots on December 02, 2007, 12:58:52 AM
perhaps Mos is hoping that Natalee is found with the search boats before the 31st

seems like that may be what he is hoping for because the BUGS might have overheard something that will link the suspects to something that she is either buried with.


 :shock:  The tennis shoe(s)??  :shock:  :P



i would eat spiders if they existed and they were found  :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2007, 01:01:42 AM
Klaas, email sent to gmail.   Please explain?

I've responded  :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on December 02, 2007, 01:02:59 AM
Klaas?  Help me out here....   I've had a long day, moving a friend on my birthday and I'm either going crazy or missing a bad joke......

Happy Birthday Dihannah.

Thank you San,  another day, another year older ;)   I try to skip them, but this one really sucked...  I am soooo exausted and trying to catch up.....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Observer on December 02, 2007, 01:03:20 AM


 :shock:  The tennis shoe(s)??  :shock:  :P



i would eat spiders if they existed and they were found  :cool:

 :shock: I may have to save this post just in case..Do you have a web camera?  :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Observer on December 02, 2007, 01:05:31 AM
Don't worry Robots..Spiders are a delicacy in some remote parts of Asia and Africa  :silent:  :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Puzzler on December 02, 2007, 01:05:32 AM


 :shock:  The tennis shoe(s)??  :shock:  :P



i would eat spiders if they existed and they were found  :cool:

 :shock: I may have to save this post just in case..Do you have a web camera?  :lol:

Web camera...that's a good one  :lol:



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2007, 01:05:39 AM


 :shock:  The tennis shoe(s)??  :shock:  :P



i would eat spiders if they existed and they were found  :cool:

 :shock: I may have to save this post just in case..Do you have a web camera?  :lol:

LOL - We can take up a fund and send one to him if he doesn't  :lol:

Edited to add:  Then I'll put it on Youtube  :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Observer on December 02, 2007, 01:09:58 AM
He even said spiders as in plural  :shock:..I will gladly donate money to a webcam  :D


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: robots on December 02, 2007, 01:10:40 AM


 :shock:  The tennis shoe(s)??  :shock:  :P



i would eat spiders if they existed and they were found  :cool:

 :shock: I may have to save this post just in case..Do you have a web camera?  :lol:

LOL - We can take up a fund and send one to him if he doesn't  :lol:

Edited to add:  Then I'll put it on Youtube  :lol:

i have a digital camera and a video camera, but i dont have a web cam



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: robots on December 02, 2007, 01:12:08 AM
He even said spiders as in plural  :shock:..I will gladly donate money to a webcam  :D

i was in third grade and i ate 2 spiders,

i was trying impress Mary Jo :)

i got no where with her, she thought it was gross

LOL - the whole thing stung  :cool: :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2007, 01:14:10 AM
Dihannah - did you get my email?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Anna on December 02, 2007, 01:16:09 AM
Robots,

That's  quite an array of things you have said you would eat if this or that happened including roadkill, your left arm and various other things.  Hope someone has been keeping tabs on all this but might make even a Robots sick!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: robots on December 02, 2007, 01:18:11 AM
Robots,

That's  quite an array of things you have said you would eat if this or that happened including roadkill, your left arm and various other things.  Hope someone has been keeping tabs on all this but might make even a Robots sick!

i know  :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool:
BUT, i have not puked in over 20 years

never gotten the flu shot and have not been sick in a long time


KNOCKING on wood now  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on December 02, 2007, 01:18:32 AM
Dihannah - did you get my email?

Yes, I responded, got kicked of my wireless, and rebooted.  Just toooo strange of a coincidence....  But thank you!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Observer on December 02, 2007, 01:22:36 AM
He even said spiders as in plural  :shock:..I will gladly donate money to a webcam  :D

i was in third grade and i ate 2 spiders,

i was trying impress Mary Jo :)

i got no where with her, she thought it was gross

LOL - the whole thing stung  :cool: :wink:

I dont think the chics at any age like them spiders,especially if one of the legs was still on your lips  :wink:

I dont think the girls are very impressed with the lying Joranstein either  :silent:

(http://img252.imageshack.us/img252/2494/joransecretsew0.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on December 02, 2007, 01:22:44 AM
However, it shows his true professionalism and how sick he really is to put that up!  :roll:  Now he disgusts me even more, if that's possible......   I s'pose he thinks that's funny?   


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2007, 01:24:42 AM
However, it shows his true professionalism and how sick he really is to put that up!  :roll:  Now he disgusts me even more, if that's possible......   I s'pose he thinks that's funny?   

He's an assbite


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: memphis on December 02, 2007, 01:25:48 AM
On many occasions, Dan Riehl mentioned that Paulus not only wants to sue all stated by Stom, but bloggers as well.  Tacopino was obviously the attorney who put this in his head, because it was about the time that Rizzo came up in the conversation.  I am sure Observor and Anna will recall that as well.


There are very strong suspicions AHATA is behind the Kalpoe lawsuit. The whole idea started in the Aruba business community.

If they aren't behind it I would suggest Deepak and Satish will spend the rest of their lives paying attorney fees.


Why would AHATA risk enormous amounts of money on the Kalpoe Brothers? Are they paying for Joe Tacopina's huge Attorney costs also?

I don't think AHATA is risking anything...the lawyers are taking the chance.  If they collect, they keep a hefty percentage of the indemnification.  This percentage is calculated based on the possibilities of recuperating damages. The harder the materialization of collection is, the higher their share.  And on the mean time, they receive as palliative compensation other benefits such as free media exposure. 

For someone like Tacopina, "Any Publicity is Good Publicity".  Most lawyers base their credentials on professional achievements.  Tacopina bases his on opinions from media outlets and personalities, as if he were on the Best Seller on the NY Times.  Check his site http://www.tacopinalaw.com .  He markets the Tacopina name as if it were a commercial good, a brandname.  He wants media time, to exploit and publicize the Tacopina Trademark. 

If he eventually sues the H-Ts and or other parties on behalf of the Van der Sloots or AHATA, he will not care about the consequences for his clients, because even if the legal actions backfires, they would have served their end, which is to encourage people to talk about him, to become better known.


IMO, very astute observations Stom.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on December 02, 2007, 01:26:29 AM
However, it shows his true professionalism and how sick he really is to put that up!  :roll:  Now he disgusts me even more, if that's possible......   I s'pose he thinks that's funny?   

Not to confuse anybody, this was for Klaas, she knows what I'm talking about...  Let's just say Tacopino is TRULY Tacky!  Proven by his website.   Ok, I'm beyond delirious, so going to bed now.

Robots,  I'm sure you have a gut of "Steel".  ;)  :)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: robots on December 02, 2007, 01:26:59 AM
He even said spiders as in plural  :shock:..I will gladly donate money to a webcam  :D

i was in third grade and i ate 2 spiders,

i was trying impress Mary Jo :)

i got no where with her, she thought it was gross

LOL - the whole thing stung  :cool: :wink:

I dont think the chics at any age like them spiders,especially if one of the legs was still on your lips  :wink:

I dont think the girls care much for the lying Joranstein either  :silent:



i think you are correct  :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2007, 01:30:36 AM
Nite Dihannah

Robots - when I was 4 I ate one of those big green flys because someone bet me I wouldn't


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Anna on December 02, 2007, 01:33:06 AM
 :shock:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: robots on December 02, 2007, 01:36:19 AM
Nite Dihannah

Robots - when I was 4 I ate one of those big green flys because someone bet me I wouldn't


 :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2007, 01:39:44 AM
Since there appears to be no news right now, think I'll "buzz"  :lol: out of here for about 15 minutes and go play some games.  Be back in a few.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: NCDan on December 02, 2007, 01:47:21 AM
G'night, Monkeys.  Keep the faith, keep the blog going, keep your chins up and keep Natalee and her family in your prayers.

Good night all. I am optimistic. My thinking is, Dutch law prohibits detention of K2 if they are only suspected of improper disposal of a body. That is supposedly a "minor" crime. If they are that far with the investigation, that is a quantum leap from last time when they refused to admit there WAS a body. And, since 2K was with J that night, either Urine of the ditch or Paul of the ditch made the need for such disposal necessary. Doogslag (manslaughter). :batman:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2007, 01:52:58 AM
G'night, Monkeys.  Keep the faith, keep the blog going, keep your chins up and keep Natalee and her family in your prayers.

Good night all. I am optimistic. My thinking is, Dutch law prohibits detention of K2 if they are only suspected of improper disposal of a body. That is supposedly a "minor" crime. If they are that far with the investigation, that is a quantum leap from last time when they refused to admit there WAS a body. And, since 2K was with J that night, either Urine of the ditch or Paul of the ditch made the need for such disposal necessary. Doogslag (manslaughter). :batman:

I agree NCDan.  I also think it does no good to be unoptimistic.  We have to hope it's different this time.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: wreck on December 02, 2007, 02:28:51 AM
He even said spiders as in plural  :shock:..I will gladly donate money to a webcam  :D

i was in third grade and i ate 2 spiders,

i was trying impress Mary Jo :)

i got no where with her, she thought it was gross

LOL - the whole thing stung  :cool: :wink:
:shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :smt102


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: wreck on December 02, 2007, 02:32:04 AM
I had a warped childhood - I never ate spiders. :shock: :-| :silent:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Peaches on December 02, 2007, 07:26:25 AM
I had a warped childhood - I never ate spiders. :shock: :-| :silent:

Sniffed your share of magic markers?

JK

Good morning.  Still trying to catch up.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Peaches on December 02, 2007, 08:25:37 AM
http://nholloway.blogspot.com/

Now THIS is a cool website!  Great information from the horse's mouth on the ship headed to Aruba to search for Natalee.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 02, 2007, 08:28:17 AM

try www.smdginc.com if you'd like to see who's running the p.r. for aruba's anti-holloway program.  it's steve cohen's group that advises political candidates in the u.s.  dirty politics is their specialty.  check out some of the campaigns for some of their clients they have listed.  imo, if you can dig deep enough you might find a taco connection.
dennisintn


I still believe that it was Steve Cohen that spewed the garbage to Bill O'Reilly several months back re: Natalee Drug OD. breaking news  :roll: story. By the way...has Bill ever mentioned this again- on air??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Peaches on December 02, 2007, 08:40:35 AM
Nut, I think BOR worked it in when he had Greta on right after the three were arrested. 

Cohen is smarmy.  He looks like a crook or pervert or both to me. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 02, 2007, 08:50:59 AM


 :shock:  The tennis shoe(s)??  :shock:  :P



i would eat spiders if they existed and they were found  :cool:

 :shock: I may have to save this post just in case..Do you have a web camera?  :lol:

LOL - We can take up a fund and send one to him if he doesn't  :lol:

Edited to add:  Then I'll put it on Youtube  :lol:

I have one I will donate!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 02, 2007, 09:15:52 AM
WTF?  Is this a joke or am I really this tired....  :-?   On his web page is a pdf, by one of our own MOnkeys????  A seemingly more valid advertisement?

http://www.tacopinalaw.com/pdfs/JoeTacopino.GQ.pdf

Are you are referring to the writer of the article in GQ magazine (which is what the PDF is)?  Not sure what you mean by one of our own Monkeys since I know Monkeys by their nicknames  :wink: And we don't give out "real life" names here.  I'm sure there is more than one person in the USA with that name.

Klaas and Di...you have mail on this one!!!


Title: Natalee lead
Post by: hopefull on December 02, 2007, 09:30:27 AM
I read that you all can get through to Beth Holloway and am hoping you will pass along this message, so that her private investigator or the FBI  can pursue it.  What i am about to tell you sounds crazy; please know i have nothing to gain from going out on this limb: I have a friend who is a very shy private person, a medium, who does not seek publicity like some other mediums out there.  She has been used by the police to solve crimes, but for reasons i won't go into here, has a policy not to come forward unless she is first approached by the family or police to solve a mystery.  She does not normally reveal her visions to others, but this one is so troubling she finally told me: Since the abduction, she has been having reoccurring dreams that Natalee was sold to the slave trade, but because her case became too notorius has been hidden away and is being held in Caracao or Caracas by two men in a decrepet cement building. she sees Natalee being drugged and cigarette burned, but still alive. She purposely does not watch the news, so she did not know about the recent developments, but of late she is getting an urgent message of "two weeks", like perhaps she only has a few weeks to live. I know that this all sounds bizarre, and you would probably think me a crackpot, (if I read this, I might also) but i had to pass it on, just in case it might help.  God bless you all and prayers for Natalee.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: nonesuche on December 02, 2007, 09:45:16 AM
hopefull - I don't know how to respond to your post so will let Klaas handle that one. I think we would all hope for Natalee to be alive but I also think whatever Mos has in hand currently might speak against that possibility.

STom is correct, Joe T isn't driven by a desire for credibility but rather for fame. It's well known he's wanted a cable show for some time now, so don't we have to ask why that hasn't happened? If people think Geraldo is a risk can you only imagine what sane producers think about Joe T? He's good for ratings and for sensationalism but he would generate too many possible lawsuits with his own unfiltered mouth. I remember one article in which he details first meeting his wife and how she was "unattainable" and how he pursued her. It was a classic tale of him perceiving her to be the uptown girl he couldn't have, so having a 'prize' is more important to him than genuinely falling in love? He's competitive, that's fine for his workplace (truly credentialed attorneys don't even view him as competition unless you want to slum with the Mafia) but there are reams of stories out there to prove marrying someone just to impress others who you 'caught' rarely results in truly happy relationships on both sides. It's like his move to CT, he so wants to be part of that Town & Country life because he grew up shut out of those arenas. Well I hate to tell him but one, those folks never truly accept you Joe they just tolerate you; two, there are far bigger rats with big bats to trip you up in high society than where you grew up too. Likely you'll ultimately get what you deserve.

Joe T rant over now.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: nonesuche on December 02, 2007, 10:04:47 AM
I don't know if this was posted prior but it's video of K2 being released yesterday

http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/us/2007/12/01/vo.aruba.kalpoes.released.cnn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Pita on December 02, 2007, 10:09:43 AM

try www.smdginc.com if you'd like to see who's running the p.r. for aruba's anti-holloway program.  it's steve cohen's group that advises political candidates in the u.s.  dirty politics is their specialty.  check out some of the campaigns for some of their clients they have listed.  imo, if you can dig deep enough you might find a taco connection.
dennisintn

Yup....Nelson Oduber and AHATA are on their client list.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 02, 2007, 10:19:10 AM
 :2thinky:  This may sound crazy too, but I think I have heard/read/seen this exact same scenario somewhere before. It rings a bell with me, I just can't remember where or when I saw it. I am going to say IMO this is not what happened to Natalee.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: nonesuche on December 02, 2007, 10:28:05 AM
I had a warped childhood - I never ate spiders. :shock: :-| :silent:

my ex used to laugh and brag about finding a nest with robin's eggs and then telling his younger sister it was a malted milk egg. poor thing she bit right into it  :shock:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 02, 2007, 10:37:08 AM
Nite Dihannah

Robots - when I was 4 I ate one of those big green flys because someone bet me I wouldn't

Finally! Now we know how you can get to and from the store so quickly.   :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: San on December 02, 2007, 10:39:22 AM
I don't know if this was posted prior but it's video of K2 being released yesterday

http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/us/2007/12/01/vo.aruba.kalpoes.released.cnn

It must be good to be a criminal in Aruba you get your own police escort home  :roll: .


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2007, 10:40:22 AM
:2thinky:  This may sound crazy too, but I think I have heard/read/seen this exact same scenario somewhere before. It rings a bell with me, I just can't remember where or when I saw it. I am going to say IMO this is not what happened to Natalee.

The "two week" reference sticks out for me  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: AZSunny on December 02, 2007, 10:45:21 AM
I don't know if this was posted prior but it's video of K2 being released yesterday

http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/us/2007/12/01/vo.aruba.kalpoes.released.cnn

It must be good to be a criminal in Aruba you get your own police escort home  :roll: .

And with a laugh and a hand shake by a man I persume to be a policeman when Satish enters the car.  :smt097


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 02, 2007, 10:49:33 AM
Hey Simian!  I am still waiting...I am relentless...if you know any thing get with the program and tell me....Who is the 5th suspect?  Where is he now?  Where was the party?  Why did he need an alibi? 

Yes, I am still waiting...someone that knows Simian needs to tell him I am calling him out.  He can email me at cindoal@yahoo.com.  It's all for you, Simian.  I am waiting.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 02, 2007, 10:49:52 AM

try www.smdginc.com if you'd like to see who's running the p.r. for aruba's anti-holloway program.  it's steve cohen's group that advises political candidates in the u.s.  dirty politics is their specialty.  check out some of the campaigns for some of their clients they have listed.  imo, if you can dig deep enough you might find a taco connection.
dennisintn


I still believe that it was Steve Cohen that spewed the garbage to Bill O'Reilly several months back re: Natalee Drug OD. breaking news  :roll: story. By the way...has Bill ever mentioned this again- on air??

Nut ... in an October, 2007 interview with Beth ... Bill O'Reilly claimed that his source was the FBI.  Gerold Dompig conveyed the same scenerio back in March, 2006 in the 48 Hours Mystery interview.  It appears that Hans Mos is claiming the same scenario in regards to the happenings of the past week.

I am somewhat inclined to believe the theory that Natalee died unintentionally but ... O'Reilly, Dompig and Mos fail to address some  big issues.

1.  They are all silent in regards to the participation of Paulus and the sons of the elite in the events that encompass that fateful morning when Natalee Holloway went missing.

2. They are silence in regards to the need for Natalee's remains to "disappear"?  What incriminating evident was on her person that would have implicated others?

3.  Which one of the participants who participated in Natalee Holloway's "disposal" possessed medical qualification to determine that she was deceased and ... not just passed out ... prior to the "disposal".

Janet

+++++++++++++++++

Beth Holloway
O'REILLY FACTOR
October 5, 2007


O'REILLY:  The FBI was present during the interrogations by Aruban authorities of those men and The Factor has learned what those agents believe happened to Natalee.  American agents.

The Feds say she died from a drug/alcohol overdose and someone or people ditched her body in the ocean. Thus, when the suspects denied killing her the could claim they weren't lying.

... How do you react to it?

HOLLOWAY:  Well Bill, I think we have always been concerned that drugs were involved in this, of course because the suspects, when they were giving the account of Natalee and the condition she was in in the car, it is very odd that she was falling asleep and waking up repeatedly and the bizarre things the suspects say she's saying. I think we've always felt that in some part, drugs were involved as far as someone slipping something in her drink unbeknownst to her.

Transcript Credit: Heli - RU


Gerold Dompig
48 Hours Mystery
March 22, 2006


"We feel strongly that she probably went into shock or something happened to her system with all this alcohol maybe on top of that other drugs which either she took or they gave her and that she just collapsed," says Dompig.

The crime, Dompig suspects, occurred when the body was illegally disposed of.  The boys may have acted alone.

"We’re not talking about killers here," he says


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Blue Moon on December 02, 2007, 11:01:27 AM
Hey Simian!  I am still waiting...I am relentless...if you know any thing get with the program and tell me....Who is the 5th suspect?  Where is he now?  Where was the party?  Why did he need an alibi? 

Yes, I am still waiting...someone that knows Simian needs to tell him I am calling him out.  He can email me at cindoal@yahoo.com.  It's all for you, Simian.  I am waiting.



I am going to throw this out to you and see what you think.  I believe the 5th suspect is Satish.  First and second was the security guards, third was Joran, fourth was Deepak and 5th was Satish. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 02, 2007, 11:01:53 AM
I don't know if this was posted prior but it's video of K2 being released yesterday

http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/us/2007/12/01/vo.aruba.kalpoes.released.cnn

It must be good to be a criminal in Aruba you get your own police escort home  :roll: .

And with a laugh and a hand shake by a man I persume to be a policeman when Satish enters the car.  :smt097

Wonder if he asked for an autograph also? :shock:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: San on December 02, 2007, 11:02:00 AM
I don't know if this was posted prior but it's video of K2 being released yesterday

http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/us/2007/12/01/vo.aruba.kalpoes.released.cnn

It must be good to be a criminal in Aruba you get your own police escort home  :roll: .

And with a laugh and a hand shake by a man I persume to be a policeman when Satish enters the car.  :smt097

I can see them saying to him there was that so bad I told you that you would be taken care of in there.  By the way did you complete our hotel accomodation card we left you on your pillow.  :D


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 02, 2007, 11:05:22 AM
Hey Simian!  I am still waiting...I am relentless...if you know any thing get with the program and tell me....Who is the 5th suspect?  Where is he now?  Where was the party?  Why did he need an alibi? 

Yes, I am still waiting...someone that knows Simian needs to tell him I am calling him out.  He can email me at cindoal@yahoo.com.  It's all for you, Simian.  I am waiting.



I am going to throw this out to you and see what you think.  I believe the 5th suspect is Satish.  First and second was the security guards, third was Joran, fourth was Deepak and 5th was Satish. 

Are you asking me?  Nope. The 5th suspect was the so called "boyfriend". The 5th suspect was the host of a "party" of some type. The 5th suspect was known to have talked or had sometype of contact with Natalee earlier in the week (which really wasn't a true week as we think of it). Therefore, Satish doesn't qualify.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Magnolia on December 02, 2007, 11:10:31 AM
There was the one time that O'Reilly said that Natalee died of
a drug overdose and his source was an Aruban official
That was when he and Rivera were on together and Rivera
said that Aruba was known for drugs and prostitution.
It created quite an uproar.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 02, 2007, 11:18:00 AM
There was the one time that O'Reilly said that Natalee died of
a drug overdose and his source was an Aruban official
That was when he and Rivera were on together and Rivera
said that Aruba was known for drugs and prostitution.
It created quite an uproar.


The truth about that island and those that are involved in all the shady underworld dealings...gambling, prostitution, porn, drugs, money laundering, etc...would truly shock the world as Jug said. If they ever name names...won't happen...they can't take that chance.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 02, 2007, 11:21:53 AM
Blue Moon
I am going to ask you a question now... Why did they arrest those particular 2 security guards?  Of all the people they had to choose from, there were more than just these two that worked as security  in that location...why were these two guys chosen?  Anyone have any idea? 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Magnolia on December 02, 2007, 11:28:38 AM
Blue Moon
I am going to ask you a question now... Why did they arrest those particular 2 security guards?  Of all the people they had to choose from, there were more than just these two that worked as security  in that location...why were these two guys chosen?  Anyone have any idea? 

I have wondered that myself....I believe they said that those two had been known
to approach tourist before.  Why do you think those two, Lalas?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Blue Moon on December 02, 2007, 11:31:58 AM
Blue Moon
I am going to ask you a question now... Why did they arrest those particular 2 security guards?  Of all the people they had to choose from, there were more than just these two that worked as security  in that location...why were these two guys chosen?  Anyone have any idea? 

I believe the 2 security guards were arrested and put in there to help the police to monitor what J2K were blabbing in jail.  JMO but I do believe they could not take a chance of having those boys talking to anyone so they placed the guards (probably paid off to do this) in cells next to them to account for anything they might say.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 02, 2007, 11:34:32 AM

I am not sure of the particular Caribbean paper that ran it, but before they were arrested, either of them, they all three said they had had consensual sex with Natalee, and if memory serves, that was also stated to the Mt Brook party.

+++++++++++++++++++++

I am convinced that Steve Cohen was speaking from a foundation of knowledge when he stated at the conference that there had been an admission from two of the suspects ... admission that they had sex with Natalee Holloway.  Cohen never denied his quoted words in his feeble attempt at a retraction.

Janet

++++++++++++++++++

Steve Cohen
ARUBA TRUTH
December 7, 2005


A coalition of groups announced Friday the appointment of Steve Cohen to act as spokesperson to North American media, in regards to the Natalee Holloway disappearance case.

AHATA and the ATA appointed Cohen to deal with all media relations concerning the case which still commands media coverage in the United States. Mr. Cohen has been part of the Strategic Communications Task Force since its creation in June. He has a full knowledge of the case and is an associate of the Strategic Message Design Group that has served in an advisory capacity to both ATA and AHATA.

The goal of this action is to coordinate the responses of the private and public sectors to North American media.


Steve Cohen
CARIBBEAN VOICE
January 28, 2006


Aruba stays afloat through Natalie Holloway's investigation
By Hazel Heyer

"Anything DNA that is identified to be of Natalee's will allow us to bring a strong case forward against the three boys. We are also getting to finally talk to some of the Alabama teens who left on that plane and did not wait around for interrogation," said Cohen.
Aruba believes it is most important to get a hold of her mental state and most importantly, Natalee's physical state at the time of disappearance. "Two of the boys said they had consensual sex with her. Whether consensual or not, depends on her ability to be conscious and make a choice." said Cohen.


Steve Cohen
ARUBA TRUTH
January 29, 2006


There are concerns about the statements regarding the investigations view of whether or not any of the suspects had consensual sex with Natalee Holloway. It was not my intention to suggest that they had admitted any such actions on the official record.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 02, 2007, 11:42:17 AM
Klaas ... the last quote in my post ... the date should be January 29, 2005.  Would you please edit it.

Thank you

Janet

You mean January 29, 2006?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 02, 2007, 11:45:19 AM
I know that MJ was released as a suspect...but has AJ ever been given that same courtesy? 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2007, 11:46:41 AM
I know that MJ was released as a suspect...but has AJ ever been given that same courtesy? 

I think it's more than a courtesy, I think you need the money to pay your attorney.  Could be AJ didn't have enough money.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 02, 2007, 11:49:47 AM
Blue Moon
I am going to ask you a question now... Why did they arrest those particular 2 security guards?  Of all the people they had to choose from, there were more than just these two that worked as security  in that location...why were these two guys chosen?  Anyone have any idea? 

I have wondered that myself....I believe they said that those two had been known
to approach tourist before.  Why do you think those two, Lalas?

Readign the PV's from both guards is quite interesting.  Yes, they must have been known to approach tourists, in fact, may have even approached some of the MB group...but why were these two out of all the others, that probably also approached tourists, singled out.  None of the 3 perps ever singled them out as being the guard they claimed saw Natalee with. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: mishy on December 02, 2007, 11:56:23 AM
WTF?  Is this a joke or am I really this tired....  :-?   On his web page is a pdf, by one of our own MOnkeys????  A seemingly more valid advertisement?

http://www.tacopinalaw.com/pdfs/JoeTacopino.GQ.pdf

Are you are referring to the writer of the article in GQ magazine (which is what the PDF is)?  Not sure what you mean by one of our own Monkeys since I know Monkeys by their nicknames  :wink: And we don't give out "real life" names here.  I'm sure there is more than one person in the USA with that name.

Klaas and Di...you have mail on this one!!!

WTF? His ostentatious display is embarrassing...Best dressed even? Heck, his shoes don't even match his suit...puh-lease  :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 02, 2007, 11:56:27 AM
I know that MJ was released as a suspect...but has AJ ever been given that same courtesy? 

I think it's more than a courtesy, I think you need the money to pay your attorney.  Could be AJ didn't have enough money.

Not sure I buy that explanation.  Seems to me that MJ didn't have enough money to pay either.  Let's see how can I say this?  Maybe MJ was a little more vocal abouthis situation and they released him as a suspect and AJ wasn't?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2007, 11:58:59 AM
I know that MJ was released as a suspect...but has AJ ever been given that same courtesy? 

I think it's more than a courtesy, I think you need the money to pay your attorney.  Could be AJ didn't have enough money.

Not sure I buy that explanation.  Seems to me that MJ didn't have enough money to pay either.  Let's see how can I say this?  Maybe MJ was a little more vocal abouthis situation and they released him as a suspect and AJ wasn't?

True.  For all we know though AJ could have been released as a suspect but with little fanfare.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 02, 2007, 12:05:51 PM
There was the one time that O'Reilly said that Natalee died of
a drug overdose and his source was an Aruban official
That was when he and Rivera were on together and Rivera
said that Aruba was known for drugs and prostitution.
It created quite an uproar.


I believe we all surmised based on events and Dompig's statement, that it was in fact, Dompig who was the informant in this case.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 02, 2007, 12:06:57 PM
Blue Moon
I am going to ask you a question now... Why did they arrest those particular 2 security guards?  Of all the people they had to choose from, there were more than just these two that worked as security  in that location...why were these two guys chosen?  Anyone have any idea? 

I have wondered that myself....I believe they said that those two had been known
to approach tourist before.  Why do you think those two, Lalas?

Was it not said that some possessions of Mountain Brook students that were missing from their rooms?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 02, 2007, 12:11:40 PM
Klaas ... the last quote in my post ... the date should be January 29, 2005.  Would you please edit it.

Thank you

Janet

You mean January 29, 2006?

Yes and ... thank you.

Klaas ... my first cuppa strong caffeinated Tim Hortons coffee is now in the prcess of warming its way through my system on a cold snowy morning.  In approximately 15 minutes ... the buzz should set in and ... the cobwebs will clear and ... hopefully I will not have to bother you again.   :wink:

Have a good Sunday Monkeys.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 02, 2007, 12:15:22 PM
Blue Moon
I am going to ask you a question now... Why did they arrest those particular 2 security guards?  Of all the people they had to choose from, there were more than just these two that worked as security  in that location...why were these two guys chosen?  Anyone have any idea? 

I have wondered that myself....I believe they said that those two had been known
to approach tourist before.  Why do you think those two, Lalas?

Was it not said that some possessions of Mountain Brook students that were missing from their rooms?

Oh yes, I remember that.  Do we know where we heard it?  Was it just rumor or did someone actually link the theft to those particular men?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 02, 2007, 12:28:44 PM
WTF?  Is this a joke or am I really this tired....  :-?   On his web page is a pdf, by one of our own MOnkeys????  A seemingly more valid advertisement?

http://www.tacopinalaw.com/pdfs/JoeTacopino.GQ.pdf

Are you are referring to the writer of the article in GQ magazine (which is what the PDF is)?  Not sure what you mean by one of our own Monkeys since I know Monkeys by their nicknames  :wink: And we don't give out "real life" names here.  I'm sure there is more than one person in the USA with that name.

Klaas and Di...you have mail on this one!!!

got it and responded.....not YOU for sure!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 02, 2007, 12:29:23 PM
Morning All!

It doesn't answer your question, Lala's but I'm sure the reason that two "Black" security guards were implicated by the suspects in the first place was because they were Black. I don't have a feel for the population % of blacks on the island, but depending on the number, that probably narrowed the choices.

With the racial remarks they attributed to Natalee, obviously Jk2 thought it might be a more believable story to an American audience that Black guys committed the crime. Those sentiments might reflect attitudes on the island as well.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 02, 2007, 12:30:50 PM
Never heard and I cannot recall if the kids had reported their missing items to the desk or the police, or what exactly.  It does not seem to matter in Aruba, to whom you report, as there is not going to be any action taken against perpetrators regardless, so it has been a haven for criminal activity where Americans spend billions of dollars to be used, abused, coerced, robbed and murdered without consequence.

I am just speculating here but travel to Aruba must be getting sticky since there is Chavez on one side threatening to overtake the Caribbean and touting pictures of Oburder, with the help of his Iranian contacts, and the Dutch who want to keep Aruba in their clutches, that maybe someone has concluded the war on terror is in their backyard, Aruba, and if they don't rescue it by doing the right thing, Iran will own South America and Aruba will be used as a training base and become a target of democracies, but not for leisure and vacation.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 02, 2007, 12:34:28 PM
I don't know if this was posted prior but it's video of K2 being released yesterday

http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/us/2007/12/01/vo.aruba.kalpoes.released.cnn

Good Morning everyone and welcome to our new monkeys!!  None thanks for posting this as I am trying to catch up from being away from SM since Friday....since the news of them being released came out....this video makes me sick to my stomach.....their asses should still be in jail.....aruba is the rotten crotch of the world....I HATE THAT PLACE


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 02, 2007, 12:39:21 PM
I hadn't seen the video, Sunny, so thanks for bringing it here. I agree, it's sickening.

Tylergal just said a mouthful! Great post!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 02, 2007, 12:43:30 PM
If anyone doubts our State Department has been in contact with this fiasco all along, doubt no longer.  I can assure you that our State Department knows when even a fly moves near Chavez.  There is technology owned by our government that can track everything.  Remember when Joran was taken in at the airport in New York because he was on "a list."  What kind of list is that?  Is that a list of potential criminals, a list of potential drug dealers, a list of potential terrorists, a list of people who have intention to do bring items or information from one country to the next that could be harmful to our economy, our democracy?  We don't know but somebody up there does.  He was on "a list," nonetheless, which means he will not go obliviously into the night.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 02, 2007, 12:46:57 PM
Never heard and I cannot recall if the kids had reported their missing items to the desk or the police, or what exactly.  It does not seem to matter in Aruba, to whom you report, as there is not going to be any action taken against perpetrators regardless, so it has been a haven for criminal activity where Americans spend billions of dollars to be used, abused, coerced, robbed and murdered without consequence.

I am just speculating here but travel to Aruba must be getting sticky since there is Chavez on one side threatening to overtake the Caribbean and touting pictures of Oburder, with the help of his Iranian contacts, and the Dutch who want to keep Aruba in their clutches, that maybe someone has concluded the war on terror is in their backyard, Aruba, and if they don't rescue it by doing the right thing, Iran will own South America and Aruba will be used as a training base and become a target of democracies, but not for leisure and vacation.

Amen Tyler.....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 02, 2007, 12:48:22 PM
I hadn't seen the video, Sunny, so thanks for bringing it here. I agree, it's sickening.

Tylergal just said a mouthful! Great post!

Morning CCB...None posted the video...sickening huh!!   Tyler's psot always give us a lot to think about...Love ya Tyler


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: wreck on December 02, 2007, 12:49:02 PM
If anyone doubts our State Department has been in contact with this fiasco all along, doubt no longer.  I can assure you that our State Department knows when even a fly moves near Chavez.  There is technology owned by our government that can track everything.  Remember when Joran was taken in at the airport in New York because he was on "a list."  What kind of list is that?  Is that a list of potential criminals, a list of potential drug dealers, a list of potential terrorists, a list of people who have intention to do bring items or information from one country to the next that could be harmful to our economy, our democracy?  We don't know but somebody up there does.  He was on "a list," nonetheless, which means he will not go obliviously into the night.
yup!  :cool: (that has been my mantra for some time). OUR GOVRNMENT KNOWS


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 02, 2007, 12:56:19 PM
Aruba needs to understand, for their own good and benefit, that nothing ever remains the same and adjust. 

At one time the South boasted some of the richest men in the world, but that was before the Civil War.  When one "sect" of people becomes jealous or tired of another, wars break out and change things.  Sometimes these wars are only civil wars, but wars nonetheless. 

Just as we have a shadow government running our country and causing the dollar to fall and our economy going to China, there are shadow governments in many governments which cause governments and their economy to change.  Aruba, is Rudy your shadow government?   

Most governments, whose leaders have a vision can re-adjust but it seems you must have someone with a vision.  Perhaps Aruba is like the USA, the citizenry is dumbed down to the point they can no longer see what the real painting is here, it's so vocal and yet so abstract.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 02, 2007, 12:56:21 PM
Never heard and I cannot recall if the kids had reported their missing items to the desk or the police, or what exactly.  It does not seem to matter in Aruba, to whom you report, as there is not going to be any action taken against perpetrators regardless, so it has been a haven for criminal activity where Americans spend billions of dollars to be used, abused, coerced, robbed and murdered without consequence.

I am just speculating here but travel to Aruba must be getting sticky since there is Chavez on one side threatening to overtake the Caribbean and touting pictures of Oburder, with the help of his Iranian contacts, and the Dutch who want to keep Aruba in their clutches, that maybe someone has concluded the war on terror is in their backyard, Aruba, and if they don't rescue it by doing the right thing, Iran will own South America and Aruba will be used as a training base and become a target of democracies, but not for leisure and vacation.

Tylergal you have done your homework and ... in my opinion ... you are right on!!

I contend that Holland's desire to hold onto Aruba and keep the island from aligning itself with Chavez ... is just another conflict of interest that abounds in the Natalee Holloway case.  The implication is ... the "powers that be" in Holland will not undermine the corrupt Aruban investigation.

If Holland was serious in regards to her desire that justice for Natalee Holloway prevails ... in the initial stages of the Aruban investigation the "powers that be" would have strongly advised Aruba that the FBI or ... another international investigative agency should be called upon ... one whose members have no personal or professional relationship with Paulus van der Sloot.  I cannot comprehend how the Dutch and Arubans are allowed to investigate ... prosecute and ... judge their own.  What is the definition of "conflict of interest" under Dutch law?

Janet

+++++++++++++++++

Jossy Mansur
NANCY GRACE
October 4, 2005


GRACE:  Jossy, regarding the connection, what I perceived to be a close connection between the judge, Paulus Van Der Sloot and the retired chief of police who initially handled Natalee`s case, Van Der Stratten, were they friends?

MANSUR: Of course, they were friends. It stands to reason they were friends because Paul Van Der Sloot had many friends within the police department; he had many friends within the Department of Justice. And he had many friends with -- and he was friendly with all the judges in Aruba. He worked out of the same office as they did and did the same work.





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 02, 2007, 12:59:16 PM
I am still hung up on the k2's release.....on helping to him a body....NATALEE ...messing with evidence..what kind of shxt hole is this where you can be a part of this and walk right out of jail....we had dinner with friends last night and although they don't follow things as closly as we do...were still totally shocked that this could happen...I listened to Mos' press conference....but it still just grates me to the bones.....

Any news of Beth, Dave and JQ's meeting with Mos???  Damn this family has suffered so much and this latest blow has to  hurt them to the very core of their being

I HATE ARUBA


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: GabbyG on December 02, 2007, 01:00:46 PM
perhaps Mos is hoping that Natalee is found with the search boats before the 31st

seems like that may be what he is hoping for because the BUGS might have overheard something that will link the suspects to something that she is either buried with.

I agree totally robots...this is what I think also.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: San on December 02, 2007, 01:00:51 PM
If anyone doubts our State Department has been in contact with this fiasco all along, doubt no longer.  I can assure you that our State Department knows when even a fly moves near Chavez.  There is technology owned by our government that can track everything.  Remember when Joran was taken in at the airport in New York because he was on "a list."  What kind of list is that?  Is that a list of potential criminals, a list of potential drug dealers, a list of potential terrorists, a list of people who have intention to do bring items or information from one country to the next that could be harmful to our economy, our democracy?  We don't know but somebody up there does.  He was on "a list," nonetheless, which means he will not go obliviously into the night.

I agree Tyler.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 02, 2007, 01:07:25 PM
WTF?  Is this a joke or am I really this tired....  :-?   On his web page is a pdf, by one of our own MOnkeys????  A seemingly more valid advertisement?

http://www.tacopinalaw.com/pdfs/JoeTacopino.GQ.pdf

Are you are referring to the writer of the article in GQ magazine (which is what the PDF is)?  Not sure what you mean by one of our own Monkeys since I know Monkeys by their nicknames  :wink: And we don't give out "real life" names here.  I'm sure there is more than one person in the USA with that name.

Klaas and Di...you have mail on this one!!!

got it and responded.....not YOU for sure!!!

Now that I am over the shock...I think it's funny!!
I WISH I were a journalist for GQ Magazine!!! THAT would be a fun job!! However...if I were to pick the hottest lawyer...lackopenis would not even be LAST on the list!!! He would be in a whole new category all by himself...and it wouldn't be a good one!!!
Call me crazy...but I think JQK is sexy!! Love his deep sexy voice and he could leave crackers in my bad anyday!! lol
I DID NOT JUST SAY THAT!!!!  :shock: lol


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 02, 2007, 01:11:39 PM
WTF?  Is this a joke or am I really this tired....  :-?   On his web page is a pdf, by one of our own MOnkeys????  A seemingly more valid advertisement?

http://www.tacopinalaw.com/pdfs/JoeTacopino.GQ.pdf

Are you are referring to the writer of the article in GQ magazine (which is what the PDF is)?  Not sure what you mean by one of our own Monkeys since I know Monkeys by their nicknames  :wink: And we don't give out "real life" names here.  I'm sure there is more than one person in the USA with that name.

Klaas and Di...you have mail on this one!!!

got it and responded.....not YOU for sure!!!

Now that I am over the shock...I think it's funny!!
I WISH I were a journalist for GQ Magazine!!! THAT would be a fun job!! However...if I were to pick the hottest lawyer...lackopenis would not even be LAST on the list!!! He would be in a whole new category all by himself...and it wouldn't be a good one!!!
Call me crazy...but I think JQK is sexy!! Love his deep sexy voice and he could leave crackers in my bad anyday!! lol
I DID NOT JUST SAY THAT!!!!  :shock: lol

I agree with you and I am an old woman but who considers a loud, obnoxious, big mouth braggart as "hot?"  Obviously, incompetent men who considers him a spokesman for their cause, whatever that cause may be? Is GQ a men's magazine or a women's magazine?  Or does it appeal more to metrosexuals?  Just asking?  My husband always considered it a magazine for "pretty boys," and my boys subscribed to it while in high school but their view of it changed once they were college graduates.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 02, 2007, 01:14:47 PM
WTF?  Is this a joke or am I really this tired....  :-?   On his web page is a pdf, by one of our own MOnkeys????  A seemingly more valid advertisement?

http://www.tacopinalaw.com/pdfs/JoeTacopino.GQ.pdf

Are you are referring to the writer of the article in GQ magazine (which is what the PDF is)?  Not sure what you mean by one of our own Monkeys since I know Monkeys by their nicknames  :wink: And we don't give out "real life" names here.  I'm sure there is more than one person in the USA with that name.

Klaas and Di...you have mail on this one!!!

got it and responded.....not YOU for sure!!!

Now that I am over the shock...I think it's funny!!
I WISH I were a journalist for GQ Magazine!!! THAT would be a fun job!! However...if I were to pick the hottest lawyer...lackopenis would not even be LAST on the list!!! He would be in a whole new category all by himself...and it wouldn't be a good one!!!
Call me crazy...but I think JQK is sexy!! Love his deep sexy voice and he could leave crackers in my bad anyday!! lol
I DID NOT JUST SAY THAT!!!!  :shock: lol

I agree with you and I am an old woman but who considers a loud, obnoxious, big mouth braggart as "hot?"  Obviously, incompetent men who considers him a spokesman for their cause, whatever that cause may be? Is GQ a men's magazine or a women's magazine?  Or does it appeal more to metrosexuals?  Just asking?  My husband always considered it a magazine for "pretty boys," and my boys subscribed to it while in high school but their view of it changed once they were college graduates.

We'll have to poll some of our male Monkeys.

Do REAL men read GQ?! :-?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 02, 2007, 01:16:05 PM


Now that I am over the shock...I think it's funny!!
I WISH I were a journalist for GQ Magazine!!! THAT would be a fun job!! However...if I were to pick the hottest lawyer...lackopenis would not even be LAST on the list!!! He would be in a whole new category all by himself...and it wouldn't be a good one!!!
Call me crazy...but I think JQK is sexy!! Love his deep sexy voice and he could leave crackers in my bad anyday!! lol
I DID NOT JUST SAY THAT!!!!  :shock: lol
LOL...Good Morning and yes you said it...don't you start this morning!   :lol:LOL


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 02, 2007, 01:17:41 PM


Now that I am over the shock...I think it's funny!!
I WISH I were a journalist for GQ Magazine!!! THAT would be a fun job!! However...if I were to pick the hottest lawyer...lackopenis would not even be LAST on the list!!! He would be in a whole new category all by himself...and it wouldn't be a good one!!!
Call me crazy...but I think JQK is sexy!! Love his deep sexy voice and he could leave crackers in my bad anyday!! lol
I DID NOT JUST SAY THAT!!!!  :shock: lol
LOL...Good Morning and yes you said it...don't you start this morning!   :lol:LOL

lol!!!
HEY!!! I drank wine last night and didn't spill a drop!!!!
And don't tell me you don't think JQK is hot...I know you better!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: private eye on December 02, 2007, 01:20:41 PM
My my such wondeful women but with such poor taste:::))))) JQK, hot????????? my my my what has this world come to, a nation of near sighted females!!!!!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 02, 2007, 01:21:24 PM


Now that I am over the shock...I think it's funny!!
I WISH I were a journalist for GQ Magazine!!! THAT would be a fun job!! However...if I were to pick the hottest lawyer...lackopenis would not even be LAST on the list!!! He would be in a whole new category all by himself...and it wouldn't be a good one!!!
Call me crazy...but I think JQK is sexy!! Love his deep sexy voice and he could leave crackers in my bad anyday!! lolI DID NOT JUST SAY THAT!!!!  :shock: lol

LOL...Good Morning and yes you said it...don't you start this morning!   :lol:LOL

ROFLMAO!!! Leave crackers in your BAD? That's a freudian slip if I ever heard one!

Actually, Idstlou, He could leave a few crumbs in mine as well.  :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 02, 2007, 01:21:38 PM

Now that I am over the shock...I think it's funny!!
I WISH I were a journalist for GQ Magazine!!! THAT would be a fun job!! However...if I were to pick the hottest lawyer...lackopenis would not even be LAST on the list!!! He would be in a whole new category all by himself...and it wouldn't be a good one!!!  Call me crazy...but I think JQK is sexy!! Love his deep sexy voice and he could leave crackers in my bad anyday!! lol
I DID NOT JUST SAY THAT!!!!  :shock: lol

Ditto.   :wink:

... and with that said ... Tamikosmom is off to church.   :lol:

Later,  Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: mishy on December 02, 2007, 01:24:57 PM

Now that I am over the shock...I think it's funny!!
I WISH I were a journalist for GQ Magazine!!! THAT would be a fun job!! However...if I were to pick the hottest lawyer...lackopenis would not even be LAST on the list!!! He would be in a whole new category all by himself...and it wouldn't be a good one!!!
Call me crazy...but I think JQK is sexy!! Love his deep sexy voice and he could leave crackers in my bad anyday!! lol
I DID NOT JUST SAY THAT!!!!  :shock: lol

hey Lldstlou...I totally agree with you on your thoughts about JQK  :wink: and he is far more intelligent and has higher moral standards than ugga maffo lackopenis...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 02, 2007, 01:25:27 PM
There was the one time that O'Reilly said that Natalee died of
a drug overdose and his source was an Aruban official
That was when he and Rivera were on together and Rivera
said that Aruba was known for drugs and prostitution.
It created quite an uproar.


That is the time I was referring to.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 02, 2007, 01:26:04 PM


Now that I am over the shock...I think it's funny!!
I WISH I were a journalist for GQ Magazine!!! THAT would be a fun job!! However...if I were to pick the hottest lawyer...lackopenis would not even be LAST on the list!!! He would be in a whole new category all by himself...and it wouldn't be a good one!!!
Call me crazy...but I think JQK is sexy!! Love his deep sexy voice and he could leave crackers in my bad anyday!! lol
I DID NOT JUST SAY THAT!!!!  :shock: lol
LOL...Good Morning and yes you said it...don't you start this morning!   :lol:LOL

lol!!!
HEY!!! I drank wine last night and didn't spill a drop!!!!
And don't tell me you don't think JQK is hot...I know you better!!!

Ok...he's HOT..... :lol: :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 02, 2007, 01:27:02 PM
Blue Moon
I am going to ask you a question now... Why did they arrest those particular 2 security guards?  Of all the people they had to choose from, there were more than just these two that worked as security  in that location...why were these two guys chosen?  Anyone have any idea? 

Someone said they had evidence that they had stolen things from the MB kids? Or traded for drugs??  :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2007, 01:27:06 PM
Private Eye - beauty is in the eye of the beholder  :lol:  Compared to JoeT, JQK is an adonis.   :lol:


(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/johnjoe.jpg)
 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: mishy on December 02, 2007, 01:27:39 PM
My my such wondeful women but with such poor taste:::))))) JQK, hot????????? my my my what has this world come to, a nation of near sighted females!!!!!!!!

Hi private,

It's not all in the "eyes," per se. Granted JQK is nice looking and definitely has a mystique about him, but men who are smart and just are very hot in my book! Just speakin' for myself, ya know  :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 02, 2007, 01:27:57 PM

Now that I am over the shock...I think it's funny!!
I WISH I were a journalist for GQ Magazine!!! THAT would be a fun job!! However...if I were to pick the hottest lawyer...lackopenis would not even be LAST on the list!!! He would be in a whole new category all by himself...and it wouldn't be a good one!!!
Call me crazy...but I think JQK is sexy!! Love his deep sexy voice and he could leave crackers in my bad anyday!! lol
I DID NOT JUST SAY THAT!!!!  :shock: lol

hey Lldstlou...I totally agree with you on your thoughts about JQK  :wink: and he is far more intelligent and has higher moral standards than ugga maffo lackopenis...

he can leave crackers in your bed also? lol


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 02, 2007, 01:29:03 PM
WTF?  Is this a joke or am I really this tired....  :-?   On his web page is a pdf, by one of our own MOnkeys????  A seemingly more valid advertisement?

http://www.tacopinalaw.com/pdfs/JoeTacopino.GQ.pdf

Are you are referring to the writer of the article in GQ magazine (which is what the PDF is)?  Not sure what you mean by one of our own Monkeys since I know Monkeys by their nicknames  :wink: And we don't give out "real life" names here.  I'm sure there is more than one person in the USA with that name.

Klaas and Di...you have mail on this one!!!

WTF? His ostentatious display is embarrassing...Best dressed even? Heck, his shoes don't even match his suit...puh-lease  :roll:

Klaas needs to put Jorans 2 sized sneakers on that photo  :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: mishy on December 02, 2007, 01:32:25 PM

he can leave crackers in your bed also? lol


I think I could make an exception for him  :geek:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 02, 2007, 01:33:11 PM

Now that I am over the shock...I think it's funny!!
I WISH I were a journalist for GQ Magazine!!! THAT would be a fun job!! However...if I were to pick the hottest lawyer...lackopenis would not even be LAST on the list!!! He would be in a whole new category all by himself...and it wouldn't be a good one!!!
Call me crazy...but I think JQK is sexy!! Love his deep sexy voice and he could leave crackers in my bad anyday!! lol
I DID NOT JUST SAY THAT!!!!  :shock: lol

hey Lldstlou...I totally agree with you on your thoughts about JQK  :wink: and he is far more intelligent and has higher moral standards than ugga maffo lackopenis...


He certainly has CLASS...no one can deny that!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 02, 2007, 01:34:24 PM
Private Eye - beauty is in the eye of the beholder  :lol:  Compared to JoeT, JQK is an adonis.   :lol:


(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/johnjoe.jpg)
 

great comparison Klaas :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Sue on December 02, 2007, 01:35:12 PM
For some reason they removed the detail from this web site

http://nholloway.blogspot.com/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 02, 2007, 01:36:03 PM
My my such wondeful women but with such poor taste:::))))) JQK, hot????????? my my my what has this world come to, a nation of near sighted females!!!!!!!!

you must sure be male!  LOL


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on December 02, 2007, 01:37:07 PM
http://nholloway.blogspot.com/

Now THIS is a cool website!  Great information from the horse's mouth on the ship headed to Aruba to search for Natalee.



Peaches  Thanks for sharing this!  What an awesome writer as well.  This is truly a fascinating blog and so exciting to be able to read and feel like I'm actually on the boat with them.  I never realized we were going to have those kind of updates during the water search, right on the boat from the 'horse's mouth' and with such passion and emotion with explanation of the technical facets. 

I know Red said we would be getting something, but not quite like that, if it's the same as what he was talking about.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 02, 2007, 01:37:12 PM
WTF?  Is this a joke or am I really this tired....  :-?   On his web page is a pdf, by one of our own MOnkeys????  A seemingly more valid advertisement?

http://www.tacopinalaw.com/pdfs/JoeTacopino.GQ.pdf

Are you are referring to the writer of the article in GQ magazine (which is what the PDF is)?  Not sure what you mean by one of our own Monkeys since I know Monkeys by their nicknames  :wink: And we don't give out "real life" names here.  I'm sure there is more than one person in the USA with that name.

Klaas and Di...you have mail on this one!!!

WTF? His ostentatious display is embarrassing...Best dressed even? Heck, his shoes don't even match his suit...puh-lease  :roll:

Klaas needs to put Jorans 2 sized sneakers on that photo  :lol:

lol, you know what they say about men who wear expensive sandals from Milan don't you....

hiding small feet? :smt002

you know what they say about small feet don't you?
lackopenis?  :smt119


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 02, 2007, 01:37:49 PM
My my such wondeful women but with such poor taste:::))))) JQK, hot????????? my my my what has this world come to, a nation of near sighted females!!!!!!!!

Hi private,

It's not all in the "eyes," per se. Granted JQK is nice looking and definitely has a mystique about him, but men who are smart and just are very hot in my book! Just speakin' for myself, ya know  :lol:

Hi Mishy!  I agree that smart men are hot....and JQ's air of confidence is sexy


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2007, 01:38:47 PM
For some reason they removed the detail from this web site

http://nholloway.blogspot.com/

Interresting.  Wonder if they were getting threats?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 02, 2007, 01:38:49 PM
For some reason they removed the detail from this web site

http://nholloway.blogspot.com/

uummmmmm perhaps thy decided it wasn't wise to post everything....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 02, 2007, 01:39:38 PM
Private Eye - beauty is in the eye of the beholder  :lol:  Compared to JoeT, JQK is an adonis.   :lol:


(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/johnjoe.jpg)
 

great comparison Klaas :lol:

I pick the door on the left!!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 02, 2007, 01:40:48 PM
I'll ask again :lol:....any news on Mos' meeting with Dave, Beth and JQ??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 02, 2007, 01:44:15 PM
I'll ask again :lol:....any news on Mos' meeting with Dave, Beth and JQ??

Did you see the article I posted yesterday?
Said they met with Mos for an hour and the interrogators for 3 hours. That is the only thing I saw besides renho's bs. :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2007, 01:45:50 PM
I'll ask again :lol:....any news on Mos' meeting with Dave, Beth and JQ??
Not that I've seen


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: flyer33716 on December 02, 2007, 01:45:53 PM
WTF?  Is this a joke or am I really this tired....  :-?   On his web page is a pdf, by one of our own MOnkeys????  A seemingly more valid advertisement?

http://www.tacopinalaw.com/pdfs/JoeTacopino.GQ.pdf

Are you are referring to the writer of the article in GQ magazine (which is what the PDF is)?  Not sure what you mean by one of our own Monkeys since I know Monkeys by their nicknames  :wink: And we don't give out "real life" names here.  I'm sure there is more than one person in the USA with that name.

Klaas and Di...you have mail on this one!!!

got it and responded.....not YOU for sure!!!

Now that I am over the shock...I think it's funny!!
I WISH I were a journalist for GQ Magazine!!! THAT would be a fun job!! However...if I were to pick the hottest lawyer...lackopenis would not even be LAST on the list!!! He would be in a whole new category all by himself...and it wouldn't be a good one!!!
Call me crazy...but I think JQK is sexy!! Love his deep sexy voice and he could leave crackers in my bad anyday!! lol
I DID NOT JUST SAY THAT!!!!  :shock: lol

I agree with you and I am an old woman but who considers a loud, obnoxious, big mouth braggart as "hot?"  Obviously, incompetent men who considers him a spokesman for their cause, whatever that cause may be? Is GQ a men's magazine or a women's magazine?  Or does it appeal more to metrosexuals?  Just asking?  My husband always considered it a magazine for "pretty boys," and my boys subscribed to it while in high school but their view of it changed once they were college graduates.

We'll have to poll some of our male Monkeys.

Do REAL men read GQ?! :-?

NEVER, Do not read rags


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 02, 2007, 01:46:06 PM
For some reason they removed the detail from this web site

http://nholloway.blogspot.com/

uummmmmm perhaps thy decided it wasn't wise to post everything....

is it me or has everything been removed temporarily for review?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on December 02, 2007, 01:46:13 PM
For some reason they removed the detail from this web site

http://nholloway.blogspot.com/

 :shock: They did!  I was just there 20 mins. ago reading!  Wonder what's up with that????


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: GabbyG on December 02, 2007, 01:46:43 PM
If anyone doubts our State Department has been in contact with this fiasco all along, doubt no longer.  I can assure you that our State Department knows when even a fly moves near Chavez.  There is technology owned by our government that can track everything.  Remember when Joran was taken in at the airport in New York because he was on "a list."  What kind of list is that?  Is that a list of potential criminals, a list of potential drug dealers, a list of potential terrorists, a list of people who have intention to do bring items or information from one country to the next that could be harmful to our economy, our democracy?  We don't know but somebody up there does.  He was on "a list," nonetheless, which means he will not go obliviously into the night.
yup!  :cool: (that has been my mantra for some time). OUR GOVRNMENT KNOWS

I agree with this, and let me explain why:
Since it first became obvious to us that this case was turning into a fiasco 2.5 years ago, I began wondering if perhaps Natalee's case didnt somehow end up smack dab in the middle of an ongoing "sting" by our government concerning drugs, money laundering, etc. and just tangling everything up. That would explain why so many FBI agents were on the island almost immediately (for damage control regarding their ongoing operation), it would explain Charles Croes saying that this goes far beyond just a missing young girl (paraphrased), Bachus commenting something to that same effect in his comments to the press after he met with ALE, etc., it would explain how so many people were suddenly discovered dead shortly after Natalee went missing... the guy with the Columbian necktie (I dont buy the story that his wife did it  LOL), the guy found dead in some kind of large storage container, and others (I know I am probably stating these wrong, it's been so long). If our govt had already been in the middle of a major sting operation when Natalee disappeared, and perhaps had been watching PVDS already, maybe even JVDS and others for drug dealing (maybe they were very small fish, but nevertheless had gotten themselves noticed regarding drugs, thus involved...perhaps because of who they got their drugs from, or who they were running drugs for, etc.). This would also explain JVDS's seemingly unlimited credit at casinos, his VIP status at CnCs - being allowed in, drinking, etc. even underage (he stated somewhere early on that he had a card he showed at a separate door to get in..in his PV I think, but perhaps one of his interviews). It would explain how Natalee's body and personal things have never been found if she was disappeared by professionals. PVDS might have called in a favor from someone on the side of the bad guys since I totally believe he is involved up to his eyeballs with the Mafia. And now maybe the sting has been completed or nearly so, to the point that everything can now be brought to an end and things involving Natalee's case brought to light. Or perhaps Mr. Mos is just gonna go ahead and try to get the case solved anyway, regardless of whether they were told not to..or not. This is all just speculation of course but it really seems feasible to me, and answers quite a few questions regarding this extremely complex case. I think it is completely possible that this case is intertwined with something MUCH more involved and that has played at least a part in why it has taken so long to solve.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on December 02, 2007, 01:48:32 PM
For some reason they removed the detail from this web site

http://nholloway.blogspot.com/

 :shock: They did!  I was just there 20 mins. ago reading!  Wonder what's up with that????

I just noticed, I still have it up in another window where I was reading, where I haven't refreshed and it's still showing.  I'm going to copy and save all the text to my puter for now.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Katysmom on December 02, 2007, 01:48:33 PM
For some reason they removed the detail from this web site

http://nholloway.blogspot.com/

uummmmmm perhaps thy decided it wasn't wise to post everything....

is it me or has everything been removed temporarily for review?

you can still see the cached page


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Sue on December 02, 2007, 01:48:51 PM
For some reason they removed the detail from this web site

http://nholloway.blogspot.com/

Interresting.  Wonder if they were getting threats?

would be interesting to find out... Watch out Aruba the troops are coming :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 02, 2007, 01:49:31 PM
For some reason they removed the detail from this web site

http://nholloway.blogspot.com/

uummmmmm perhaps thy decided it wasn't wise to post everything....

His name & contact info is on the site, so maybe he was contacted for content...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Spock on December 02, 2007, 01:50:14 PM
I would like to see that typed copy of the press release on the Judges decision to release Kalpoes again. Can someone put it ip? Thank You.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 02, 2007, 01:51:17 PM
I'll ask again :lol:....any news on Mos' meeting with Dave, Beth and JQ??

Did you see the article I posted yesterday?
Said they met with Mos for an hour and the interrogators for 3 hours. That is the only thing I saw besides renho's bs. :roll:

thanks LD...no I haven't gone back to read.....would you repost it for me and others who might have missed it.... :lol:

I did get an email that contained renHO's statement on RU...but as well know that pure bull crap!! :roll: :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 02, 2007, 01:52:10 PM
I'll ask again :lol:....any news on Mos' meeting with Dave, Beth and JQ??
Not that I've seen

thanks Klaas....I know we probably won't hear any details.....but would love to know how they felt it went


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Sue on December 02, 2007, 01:52:40 PM

I wonder if his web page can track where people visit from like you can here.. be interesting to see how many arubans are hitting that site


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 02, 2007, 01:52:59 PM
I'll ask again :lol:....any news on Mos' meeting with Dave, Beth and JQ??

Did you see the article I posted yesterday?
Said they met with Mos for an hour and the interrogators for 3 hours. That is the only thing I saw besides renho's bs. :roll:

thanks LD...no I haven't gone back to read.....would you repost it for me and others who might have missed it.... :lol:

I did get an email that contained renHO's statement on RU...but as well know that pure bull crap!! :roll: :roll:

I'll find it again...think it was CNN...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: snoopy on December 02, 2007, 01:53:14 PM
For some reason they removed the detail from this web site

http://nholloway.blogspot.com/

Whaaaaat!!  I need that back!!  :2doh:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 02, 2007, 01:54:12 PM
If anyone doubts our State Department has been in contact with this fiasco all along, doubt no longer.  I can assure you that our State Department knows when even a fly moves near Chavez.  There is technology owned by our government that can track everything.  Remember when Joran was taken in at the airport in New York because he was on "a list."  What kind of list is that?  Is that a list of potential criminals, a list of potential drug dealers, a list of potential terrorists, a list of people who have intention to do bring items or information from one country to the next that could be harmful to our economy, our democracy?  We don't know but somebody up there does.  He was on "a list," nonetheless, which means he will not go obliviously into the night.
yup!  :cool: (that has been my mantra for some time). OUR GOVRNMENT KNOWS

I agree with this, and let me explain why:
Since it first became obvious to us that this case was turning into a fiasco 2.5 years ago, I began wondering if perhaps Natalee's case didnt somehow end up smack dab in the middle of an ongoing "sting" by our government concerning drugs, money laundering, etc. and just tangling everything up. That would explain why so many FBI agents were on the island almost immediately (for damage control regarding their ongoing operation), it would explain Charles Croes saying that this goes far beyond just a missing young girl (paraphrased), Bachus commenting something to that same effect in his comments to the press after he met with ALE, etc., it would explain how so many people were suddenly discovered dead shortly after Natalee went missing... the guy with the Columbian necktie (I dont buy the story that his wife did it  LOL), the guy found dead in some kind of large storage container, and others (I know I am probably stating these wrong, it's been so long). If our govt had already been in the middle of a major sting operation when Natalee disappeared, and perhaps had been watching PVDS already, maybe even JVDS and others for drug dealing (maybe they were very small fish, but nevertheless had gotten themselves noticed regarding drugs, thus involved...perhaps because of who they got their drugs from, or who they were running drugs for, etc.). This would also explain JVDS's seemingly unlimited credit at casinos, his VIP status at CnCs - being allowed in, drinking, etc. even underage (he stated somewhere early on that he had a card he showed at a separate door to get in..in his PV I think, but perhaps one of his interviews). It would explain how Natalee's body and personal things have never been found if she was disappeared by professionals. PVDS might have called in a favor from someone on the side of the bad guys since I totally believe he is involved up to his eyeballs with the Mafia. And now maybe the sting has been completed or nearly so, to the point that everything can now be brought to an end and things involving Natalee's case brought to light. Or perhaps Mr. Mos is just gonna go ahead and try to get the case solved anyway, regardless of whether they were told not to..or not. This is all just speculation of course but it really seems feasible to me, and answers quite a few questions regarding this extremely complex case. I think it is completely possible that this case is intertwined with something MUCH more involved and that has played at least a part in why it has taken so long to solve.

Gabby that goes right along with Beth and Jug saying they had information that would be shocking


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on December 02, 2007, 01:54:29 PM
Thank God the window was still opened.   I have it all saved on my computer, images and all. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 02, 2007, 01:55:39 PM
I'll ask again :lol:....any news on Mos' meeting with Dave, Beth and JQ??

Did you see the article I posted yesterday?
Said they met with Mos for an hour and the interrogators for 3 hours. That is the only thing I saw besides renho's bs. :roll:

thanks LD...no I haven't gone back to read.....would you repost it for me and others who might have missed it.... :lol:

I did get an email that contained renHO's statement on RU...but as well know that pure bull crap!! :roll: :roll:

I'll find it again...think it was CNN...

thank you


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Spock on December 02, 2007, 01:56:28 PM
I would like to see that typed copy of the press release on the Judges decision to release Kalpoes again. Can someone put it ip? Thank You.
Still cant find it, it was a photo of the press release with the Judges ruling...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 02, 2007, 01:57:05 PM
For some reason they removed the detail from this web site

http://nholloway.blogspot.com/

Whaaaaat!!  I need that back!!  :2doh:

Hi Snoopy!!!! :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 02, 2007, 01:57:57 PM
Thank God the window was still opened.   I have it all saved on my computer, images and all. 

WTG Di!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on December 02, 2007, 01:58:28 PM
For some reason they removed the detail from this web site

http://nholloway.blogspot.com/

Whaaaaat!!  I need that back!!  :2doh:

I got it saved! ;)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 02, 2007, 01:58:33 PM
I'll ask again :lol:....any news on Mos' meeting with Dave, Beth and JQ??

http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/americas/12/01/aruba.holloway/

Did you see the article I posted yesterday?
Said they met with Mos for an hour and the interrogators for 3 hours. That is the only thing I saw besides renho's bs. :roll:

thanks LD...no I haven't gone back to read.....would you repost it for me and others who might have missed it.... :lol:

I did get an email that contained renHO's statement on RU...but as well know that pure bull crap!! :roll: :roll:

I'll find it again...think it was CNN...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2007, 01:58:37 PM
I would like to see that typed copy of the press release on the Judges decision to release Kalpoes again. Can someone put it ip? Thank You.
Still cant find it, it was a photo of the press release with the Judges ruling...


(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/6ly4kyq.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 02, 2007, 01:59:08 PM
I'll ask again :lol:....any news on Mos' meeting with Dave, Beth and JQ??

http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/americas/12/01/aruba.holloway/

Did you see the article I posted yesterday?
Said they met with Mos for an hour and the interrogators for 3 hours. That is the only thing I saw besides renho's bs. :roll:

thanks LD...no I haven't gone back to read.....would you repost it for me and others who might have missed it.... :lol:

I did get an email that contained renHO's statement on RU...but as well know that pure bull crap!! :roll: :roll:

I'll find it again...think it was CNN...

oops!!!
http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/americas/12/01/aruba.holloway/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 02, 2007, 02:04:19 PM

I wonder if his web page can track where people visit from like you can here.. be interesting to see how many arubans are hitting that site

Like SunnyinTX, I was thinking maybe security reasons....not sure.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: snoopy on December 02, 2007, 02:04:26 PM
For some reason they removed the detail from this web site

http://nholloway.blogspot.com/

Whaaaaat!!  I need that back!!  :2doh:

I got it saved! ;)


 :D :D :D  :D

Hi Sunny and everybody


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 02, 2007, 02:07:01 PM
Thank God the window was still opened.   I have it all saved on my computer, images and all. 

O/T real quick!!! So sorry!!!
Did ya see this girlfriend???!!!
GO BUCKEYES!!!!RANKINGS AP Top 25
Ohio St.
LSU
Oklahoma
Georgia
Virginia Tech
USC
Missouri
Kansas
Florida
Hawaii


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on December 02, 2007, 02:08:39 PM
Thank God the window was still opened.   I have it all saved on my computer, images and all. 

O/T real quick!!! So sorry!!!
Did ya see this girlfriend???!!!
GO BUCKEYES!!!!RANKINGS AP Top 25
Ohio St.
LSU
Oklahoma
Georgia
Virginia Tech
USC
Missouri
Kansas
Florida
Hawaii


Awesome, huh....  :D


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: AnnieMW1 on December 02, 2007, 02:11:28 PM
I think it's very interesting that we HAVEN'T heard a word from the family.  Very different approach this time around.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 02, 2007, 02:11:42 PM
Has anyone seen Rob in the last few days?  He's been missing in action...during all the action, in fact.   

Has Simian called my name yet?  Still waiting?  Where the heck did Shango go?  I am getting tired of asking all the questions after 2 years. 

Hey Aruba!  If you had asked some questions 2 years ago...we might have the answers by now.


What ever happened to Tony?  Our super secret informant from Aruba?  Any new suicides down there lately?

Is Deepak still breathing? Still walking the streets?  Thinking out loud again.  :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 02, 2007, 02:11:52 PM
Thank God the window was still opened.   I have it all saved on my computer, images and all. 

O/T real quick!!! So sorry!!!
Did ya see this girlfriend???!!!
GO BUCKEYES!!!!RANKINGS AP Top 25
Ohio St.
LSU
Oklahoma
Georgia
Virginia Tech
USC
Missouri
Kansas
Florida
Hawaii


Awesome, huh....  :D

OH YEA!!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 02, 2007, 02:12:57 PM
Thank God the window was still opened.   I have it all saved on my computer, images and all. 

O/T real quick!!! So sorry!!!
Did ya see this girlfriend???!!!
GO BUCKEYES!!!!RANKINGS AP Top 25
Ohio St.
LSU
Oklahoma
Georgia
Virginia Tech
USC
Missouri
Kansas
Florida
Hawaii


Awesome, huh....  :D


One team on that list...still undefeated...still overlooked.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: wreck on December 02, 2007, 02:13:36 PM
I think it's very interesting that we HAVEN'T heard a word from the family.  Very different approach this time around.
Good point!
I think we would hear about it if they were not 100% convinced it was legitimate this time around.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 02, 2007, 02:14:24 PM
I think it's very interesting that we HAVEN'T heard a word from the family.  Very different approach this time around.

Not a whole lot posted. The following was printed in the CNN article I posted above:

Quote
Meanwhile, Holloway's parents met with Mos for about an hour Saturday, and with interrogators for three hours. Neither spoke to reporters afterward


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: sleddogs on December 02, 2007, 02:14:58 PM
Klaas,

Please see my post

Re: Monkey Musings Daily Open Discussion #9 11/19 -
« Reply #162 on: November 29, 2007, 09:10:16 PM

TIA

Sleddogs:  I can't answer that question, email Dugga ok?  dugga@scaredmonkeys.com


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 02, 2007, 02:16:33 PM
Thank God the window was still opened.   I have it all saved on my computer, images and all. 

O/T real quick!!! So sorry!!!
Did ya see this girlfriend???!!!
GO BUCKEYES!!!!RANKINGS AP Top 25
Ohio St.
LSU
Oklahoma
Georgia
Virginia Tech
USC
Missouri
Kansas
Florida
Hawaii


Awesome, huh....  :D


One team on that list...still undefeated...still overlooked.

Hawaii correct?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 02, 2007, 02:17:03 PM
I think it's very interesting that we HAVEN'T heard a word from the family.  Very different approach this time around.
Good point!
I think we would hear about it if they were not 100% convinced it was legitimate this time around.

I would assume that Mos asked them to stay quiet for a few more days...at least until December 31st.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 02, 2007, 02:19:05 PM
I am not sure how many of you have watched this Greta disinfo program this weekend, but note that her main source is the Sporter.  Then she goes to Tito, another 'impeccable' source, according to Greta.  It's no wonder Beth shuns her like the plague until it is advantageous to Beth.  I think JQK is calling the shots for Beth and telling her to dodge Greta.  He knows that Great is closely aligned with the group of attorneys we so hate, i.e., Johnny Cochran, joe tacopino and that slug that defended Scott Peterson.  That seems to be her "group." 

She redeemed herself when first coming to Fox, but she has found another venue to espouse her dislike for justice and the rule of law.  JMHO.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 02, 2007, 02:23:06 PM
I am not sure how many of you have watched this Greta disinfo program this weekend, but note that her main source is the Sporter.  Then she goes to Tito, another 'impeccable' source, according to Greta.  It's no wonder Beth shuns her like the plague until it is advantageous to Beth.  I think JQK is calling the shots for Beth and telling her to dodge Greta.  He knows that Great is closely aligned with the group of attorneys we so hate, i.e., Johnny Cochran, joe tacopino and that slug that defended Scott Peterson.  That seems to be her "group." 

She redeemed herself when first coming to Fox, but she has found another venue to espouse her dislike for justice and the rule of law.  JMHO.

Let's not forget her defense attorney mindset...permeates all she does.  Goes back to her roots, both liberal and professional.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Magnolia on December 02, 2007, 02:34:31 PM
I think it's very interesting that we HAVEN'T heard a word from the family.  Very different approach this time around.
Good point!
I think we would hear about it if they were not 100% convinced it was legitimate this time around.

I would assume that Mos asked them to stay quiet for a few more days...at least until December 31st.

He did.  It was in one of his statements.  He said something to the effect that he would ask the family not to speak of the meeting.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Red on December 02, 2007, 02:35:37 PM
So tell me, does the MO of this case sound familiar?

With all the twists and turns in the bizarre case of missing and murdered Emily Sander/Zoey Zane, one things remains constant … the number one suspect in this case is the individual she left the bar with and was last known seen with. Missing persons cases begin to sound familiar don’t they?

Sad Conclusion to Bizarre Case of Missing Emily Sander/Internet Porn Star Zoey Zane Body Positively ID’d

http://scaredmonkeys.com/2007/12/02/sad-conclusion-to-bizarre-case-of-missing-emily-sanderinternet-porn-star-zoey-zane-body-positively-idd/

Now the work that still needs to be done by police and investigators is finding Israel Mireles. Emily Sander was last spotted leaving a bar in El Dorado, KS on Friday night with Israel Mireles. According to her friend, Emily Sander and Israel Mireles, met that night at the bar. Emily Sander had not been seen again until her body was discovered last Thursday. So the main suspect in this case is the individual who Emily was last seen leaving the bar with … MO’s in missing persons/murder cases begin to sound rather similar.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 02, 2007, 02:39:29 PM
For some reason they removed the detail from this web site

http://nholloway.blogspot.com/

Interresting.  Wonder if they were getting threats?


Perhaps they are reviewing any logistic info...to be sure no one knows exactly where they are going? Seems like they are too smart to have hinted at anything like that though...mmm......this is interesting.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 02, 2007, 02:43:58 PM
mmmmmm....I noticed WangChung is back at it again at RU today. He has been 'missing' for 10 days.....mmmmmm :2thinky:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: WhiskeyGirl on December 02, 2007, 03:00:13 PM
Blue Moon
I am going to ask you a question now... Why did they arrest those particular 2 security guards?  Of all the people they had to choose from, there were more than just these two that worked as security  in that location...why were these two guys chosen?  Anyone have any idea? 

Someone said they had evidence that they had stolen things from the MB kids? Or traded for drugs??  :roll:

Who from MB filed a police report?  Who took that report?

Anyone from MB step up to the plate to identify the stolen / traded merchandise?

Anyone step up to admit they even tried to lodge a complaint with ALE?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: terryd270 on December 02, 2007, 03:02:56 PM
When will the insanity stop?? I have lost a lot of faith in whats good and whats bad.. The sad things is that I never knew there were so many twisted individuals in the world but seeing the same dirt bags cheering for these killers just is too much to watch or hear on tv.. I come here just to see if by chance that someone has a conscience on that island but so far not a one.. I have a hard time putting too much faith in finding Natalee in the ocean but I do hope I'm wrong.. I just feel that everyone on that island is playing a cruel game and I have a hard time watching or hearing these idiots on tv.. This is the most simple case in the world and this would of been closed the first 24 hours if they wanted it solved.. Well hopefully my feelings are wrong and this time they will give Beth and Dave some answers if not their daughter back.. Have a good day and hopefully Joran and the others are having a rotten day..

td


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Magnolia on December 02, 2007, 03:09:03 PM
mmmmmm....I noticed WangChung is back at it again at RU today. He has been 'missing' for 10 days.....mmmmmm :2thinky:


Wang Chung should stay missing.  I think that Wang is female...just such a dirty mind that one would assume male.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2007, 03:12:43 PM
So tell me, does the MO of this case sound familiar?

With all the twists and turns in the bizarre case of missing and murdered Emily Sander/Zoey Zane, one things remains constant … the number one suspect in this case is the individual she left the bar with and was last known seen with. Missing persons cases begin to sound familiar don’t they?

Sad Conclusion to Bizarre Case of Missing Emily Sander/Internet Porn Star Zoey Zane Body Positively ID’d

http://scaredmonkeys.com/2007/12/02/sad-conclusion-to-bizarre-case-of-missing-emily-sanderinternet-porn-star-zoey-zane-body-positively-idd/

Now the work that still needs to be done by police and investigators is finding Israel Mireles. Emily Sander was last spotted leaving a bar in El Dorado, KS on Friday night with Israel Mireles. According to her friend, Emily Sander and Israel Mireles, met that night at the bar. Emily Sander had not been seen again until her body was discovered last Thursday. So the main suspect in this case is the individual who Emily was last seen leaving the bar with … MO’s in missing persons/murder cases begin to sound rather similar.



Yes Red, the last person seen with them.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Buckeye on December 02, 2007, 03:13:48 PM
I think the repeat, of the Peter DeVries investigation, was broadcast last night. He's convinced Joran lies and is involved.  Wish he would head to the island.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2007, 03:15:08 PM
Posted by Glenda at Ru:

Quote
You mean the fisherman who didn't report a crab trap stolen although that is the premise for the Million Dollar Search for Natalee. Did I read here that the owner of the boat was quoted saying her remains would still be intact because the water is sooo cold. What is the definition of Cold? Because this water is like a warm bathtub.


Question for Glenda:  When was the last time you dove to 1000 feet?   


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 02, 2007, 03:20:27 PM
Posted by Glenda at Ru:

Quote
You mean the fisherman who didn't report a crab trap stolen although that is the premise for the Million Dollar Search for Natalee. Did I read here that the owner of the boat was quoted saying her remains would still be intact because the water is sooo cold. What is the definition of Cold? Because this water is like a warm bathtub.


Question for Glenda:  When was the last time you dove to 1000 feet?   


I am going to ask an oceanography friend who taught at the graduate level.  I am sure she is qualified to answer that and if she does not know the answer, some of her contacts will. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Magnolia on December 02, 2007, 03:21:04 PM
Posted by Glenda at Ru:

Quote
You mean the fisherman who didn't report a crab trap stolen although that is the premise for the Million Dollar Search for Natalee. Did I read here that the owner of the boat was quoted saying her remains would still be intact because the water is sooo cold. What is the definition of Cold? Because this water is like a warm bathtub.


Question for Glenda:  When was the last time you dove to 1000 feet?   

Don't I remember Dompig saying that a fish trap and a knife were reported stolen.  I wish there was a way to arrest Julia for spreading misinformation
and trying to mislead the investigation and her skanky mother too.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on December 02, 2007, 03:21:12 PM

Who from MB filed a police report?  Who took that report?

Anyone from MB step up to the plate to identify the stolen / traded merchandise?

Anyone step up to admit they even tried to lodge a complaint with ALE?


It was reported in the media that the prosecutor and police found nothing during the Cowboy their raid on their homes. You can bet if they had so much as a pack of matches from the holiday Inn they would still be in jail.

They cooked this up, I suppose Paulus, van der Straten and Jacobs came up with it it, maybe Janssen was in on it. It was a diversion to give the perps five more days of cleaning up and making sure the body and evidence were properly disposed of. It worked for the most part, that's why the case has dragged on this long.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Shell on December 02, 2007, 03:21:40 PM
Posted by Glenda at Ru:

Quote
You mean the fisherman who didn't report a crab trap stolen although that is the premise for the Million Dollar Search for Natalee. Did I read here that the owner of the boat was quoted saying her remains would still be intact because the water is sooo cold. What is the definition of Cold? Because this water is like a warm bathtub.


Question for Glenda:  When was the last time you dove to 1000 feet?   

Good one Klaas!!! IMHO-My hopes are positive that justice will prevail with this new investigative crew.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 02, 2007, 03:24:10 PM
While I am awaiting Ann's response to the temperature of the Caribbean at that level, I found this.

Ocean temperature also varies with depth. In general, the temperature falls as the depth increases. The warm surface waters extend to depths of about 500 feet (150 metres) in the tropics, and about 1,000 feet (300 metres) in the subtropics. Below the surface waters, the temperature drops rapidly, forming a layer called the thermocline. The thermocline varies in thickness, from about 1,000 feet (300 metres) to 3,000 feet (910 metres). Below the thermocline, the water cools more slowly. Close to the deep-sea floor, the temperature of the ocean ranges between 34 and 39 °F (1 and 4 °C) (Eliav, Weiss.)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 02, 2007, 03:25:28 PM

Who from MB filed a police report?  Who took that report?

Anyone from MB step up to the plate to identify the stolen / traded merchandise?

Anyone step up to admit they even tried to lodge a complaint with ALE?


It was reported in the media that the prosecutor and police found nothing during the Cowboy their raid on their homes. You can bet if they had so much as a pack of matches from the holiday Inn they would still be in jail.

They cooked this up, I suppose Paulus, van der Straten and Jacobs came up with it it, maybe Janssen was in on it. It was a diversion to give the perps five more days of cleaning up and making sure the body and evidence were properly disposed of. It worked for the most part, that's why the case has dragged on this long.


Thanks, Dayhiker.  I had probably heard this but had forgotten it.  I appreciate your prompt response so that puts to rest that pack-a-tales.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on December 02, 2007, 03:26:34 PM
When will the insanity stop?? I have lost a lot of faith in whats good and whats bad.. The sad things is that I never knew there were so many twisted individuals in the world but seeing the same dirt bags cheering for these killers just is too much to watch or hear on tv.. I come here just to see if by chance that someone has a conscience on that island but so far not a one.. I have a hard time putting too much faith in finding Natalee in the ocean but I do hope I'm wrong.. I just feel that everyone on that island is playing a cruel game and I have a hard time watching or hearing these idiots on tv.. This is the most simple case in the world and this would of been closed the first 24 hours if they wanted it solved.. Well hopefully my feelings are wrong and this time they will give Beth and Dave some answers if not their daughter back.. Have a good day and hopefully Joran and the others are having a rotten day..

td


The insanity won't stop until the Arubans arrest the perps, try them, convict them, and imprison them. Until then Aruba will be marked as an unsafe, corrupt toilet of an island to stay away from and van der Sloots will be looked upon as a couple of worthless predators who got away with a crime against an innocent American girl.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: WhiskeyGirl on December 02, 2007, 03:27:26 PM
Posted by Glenda at Ru:

Quote
You mean the fisherman who didn't report a crab trap stolen although that is the premise for the Million Dollar Search for Natalee. Did I read here that the owner of the boat was quoted saying her remains would still be intact because the water is sooo cold. What is the definition of Cold? Because this water is like a warm bathtub.


Question for Glenda:  When was the last time you dove to 1000 feet?   

I remember reading about the F-16 flyovers back in 2005.

Did they make any recordings of the waters around Aruba?

Anyone look there?

Who decided where the F-16's searched?  Who had their hands in that cookie jar?

If a crab trap were missing, if there was suggestion she was left at the beach, why didn't the F-16 do a detail fly over of the waters surrounding Aruba?

Or, maybe they did?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on December 02, 2007, 03:32:11 PM
Posted by Glenda at Ru:

Quote
You mean the fisherman who didn't report a crab trap stolen although that is the premise for the Million Dollar Search for Natalee. Did I read here that the owner of the boat was quoted saying her remains would still be intact because the water is sooo cold. What is the definition of Cold? Because this water is like a warm bathtub.


Question for Glenda:  When was the last time you dove to 1000 feet?   


No brainer alert. Anyone who criticizes this search obviously doesn't want Natalee found. Must be friends with the van der Sloots, that is the only reason I can think of any person would make such remarks. Even the Arubans who are sick of the case would rather she be found to get the whole debacle over with.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2007, 03:35:19 PM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/temperature_depth.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Shell on December 02, 2007, 03:36:31 PM
When will the insanity stop?? I have lost a lot of faith in whats good and whats bad.. The sad things is that I never knew there were so many twisted individuals in the world but seeing the same dirt bags cheering for these killers just is too much to watch or hear on tv.. I come here just to see if by chance that someone has a conscience on that island but so far not a one.. I have a hard time putting too much faith in finding Natalee in the ocean but I do hope I'm wrong.. I just feel that everyone on that island is playing a cruel game and I have a hard time watching or hearing these idiots on tv.. This is the most simple case in the world and this would of been closed the first 24 hours if they wanted it solved.. Well hopefully my feelings are wrong and this time they will give Beth and Dave some answers if not their daughter back.. Have a good day and hopefully Joran and the others are having a rotten day..

td


The insanity won't stop until the Arubans arrest the perps, try them, convict them, and imprison them. Until then Aruba will be marked as an unsafe, corrupt toilet of an island to stay away from and van der Sloots will be looked upon as a couple of worthless predators who got away with a crime against an innocent American girl.

Well said


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on December 02, 2007, 03:44:20 PM
While I am awaiting Ann's response to the temperature of the Caribbean at that level, I found this.

Ocean temperature also varies with depth. In general, the temperature falls as the depth increases. The warm surface waters extend to depths of about 500 feet (150 metres) in the tropics, and about 1,000 feet (300 metres) in the subtropics. Below the surface waters, the temperature drops rapidly, forming a layer called the thermocline. The thermocline varies in thickness, from about 1,000 feet (300 metres) to 3,000 feet (910 metres). Below the thermocline, the water cools more slowly. Close to the deep-sea floor, the temperature of the ocean ranges between 34 and 39 °F (1 and 4 °C) (Eliav, Weiss.)


In 40 degree water a person will be lucky to live one hour before they die of hypothermia. In 32 degree water under 15 minutes. Even in 60 degree water temp you will die in 6 hours.

BTW, refrigerators are usually set at 40 degress or below to sufficiently slow bacterial growth. Salt in the water also acts as a preservative.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 02, 2007, 03:46:07 PM
Has anyone seen or heard from Rob lately?  I have not seen him on here and I am worried about him.  Rob, if you are around, let us hear from you. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2007, 03:54:42 PM
Has anyone seen or heard from Rob lately?  I have not seen him on here and I am worried about him.  Rob, if you are around, let us hear from you. 

He's updated his blog today so I'm guessing he's ok.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 02, 2007, 03:56:17 PM
While I am awaiting Ann's response to the temperature of the Caribbean at that level, I found this.

Ocean temperature also varies with depth. In general, the temperature falls as the depth increases. The warm surface waters extend to depths of about 500 feet (150 metres) in the tropics, and about 1,000 feet (300 metres) in the subtropics. Below the surface waters, the temperature drops rapidly, forming a layer called the thermocline. The thermocline varies in thickness, from about 1,000 feet (300 metres) to 3,000 feet (910 metres). Below the thermocline, the water cools more slowly. Close to the deep-sea floor, the temperature of the ocean ranges between 34 and 39 °F (1 and 4 °C) (Eliav, Weiss.)


In 40 degree water a person will be lucky to live one hour before they die of hypothermia. In 32 degree water under 15 minutes. Even in 60 degree water temp you will die in 6 hours.

BTW, refrigerators are usually set at 40 degress or below to sufficiently slow bacterial growth. Salt in the water also acts as a preservative.


Well, yes, I sort of knew that about refrigeration and salt, but was wondering what the temperatures were in the Caribbean as opposed to the Atlantic, Pacific, etc.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 02, 2007, 03:59:38 PM
Has anyone seen or heard from Rob lately?  I have not seen him on here and I am worried about him.  Rob, if you are around, let us hear from you. 

He's updated his blog today so I'm guessing he's ok.

Thanks, Klaas.  I sort of miss his mixing it up and his theories, etc.  It lends itself to an interesting debate, with which I do not always agree, but enjoy nonetheless, the brain exercises.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 02, 2007, 04:03:03 PM
Suffice it to say, I also enjoy seeing the programs of open-heart surgery and the off-pump bypasses, the inducement of hypothermia, cold-blood cardioplegia, stop the beating heart, etc.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: WhiskeyGirl on December 02, 2007, 04:08:58 PM
Why would AHATA risk enormous amounts of money on the Kalpoe Brothers? Are they paying for Joe Tacopina's huge Attorney costs also?

Why would AHTA risk enormous amounts of money on the Kalpoe Brothers?  That is a very good question.

Here are a few thoughts that come to mind (JMHO) ~

  • They misunderstand how the American justice system works.  Sometimes, 'no body' may not be an insurance policy to insure that there is 'no case'
  • The term 'there is no evidence' is highly subjective
  • What is the difference between "beyond a reasonable doubt" and "a preponderance of the evidence"?
  • Is winning any lawsuit against Dr. Phil or Natalee's family likely to bring tourists to the island?
  • How will the average Aruba profit from these lawsuits?
  • From any boycott?
  • How with the wealth of Avarice be distributed among the little people?
    • Perhaps it will 'trickle down' from those above?
    • Do any of these lawsuits make life better for the sons and daughters of Aruban's?
    • Put food on the Aruban table, or shoes on the feet of Aruban children?
    • Raise taxes to pay for them?

    Quote
    preponderance of the evidence
    n. the greater weight of the evidence required in a civil (non-criminal) lawsuit for the trier of fact (jury or judge without a jury) to decide in favor of one side or the other. This preponderance is based on the more convincing evidence and its probable truth or accuracy, and not on the amount of evidence. Thus, one clearly knowledgeable witness may provide a preponderance of evidence over a dozen witnesses with hazy testimony, or a signed agreement with definite terms may outweigh opinions or speculation about what the parties intended. Preponderance of the evidence is required in a civil case and is contrasted with "beyond a reasonable doubt," which is the more severe test of evidence required to convict in a criminal trial. No matter what the definition stated in various legal opinions, the meaning is somewhat subjective.
    http://dictionary.law.com/definition2.asp?selected=1586
    Quote
    evidence
    n. every type of proof legally presented at trial (allowed by the judge) which is intended to convince the judge and/or jury of alleged facts material to the case. It can include oral testimony of witnesses, including experts on technical matters, documents, public records, objects, photographs and depositions (testimony under oath taken before trial). It also includes so-called "circumstantial evidence" which is intended to create belief by showing surrounding circumstances which logically lead to a conclusion of fact. Comments and arguments by the attorneys, statements by the judge and answers to questions which the judge has ruled objectionable are not evidence. ...Evidence must survive objections of opposing attorneys that it is irrelevant, immaterial or violates rules against "hearsay" (statements by a party not in court), and/or other technicalities.
    http://dictionary.law.com/definition2.asp?selected=671&bold=
    Quote
    circumstantial evidence
    n. evidence in a trial which is not directly from an eyewitness or participant and requires some reasoning to prove a fact. There is a public perception that such evidence is weak ("all they have is circumstantial evidence"), but the probable conclusion from the circumstances may be so strong that there can be little doubt as to a vital fact ("beyond a reasonable doubt" in a criminal case, and "a preponderance of the evidence" in a civil case). Particularly in criminal cases, "eyewitness" ("I saw Frankie shoot Johnny") type evidence is often lacking and may be unreliable, so circumstantial evidence becomes essential. Prior threats to the victim, fingerprints found at the scene of the crime, ownership of the murder weapon, and the accused being seen in the neighborhood, certainly point to the suspect as being the killer, but each bit of evidence is circumstantial.
    http://dictionary.law.com/definition2.asp?selected=191&bold=
    Quote
    res ipsa loquitur
    (rayz ip-sah loh-quit-her) n. Latin for "the thing speaks for itself," a doctrine of law that one is presumed to be negligent if he/she/it had exclusive control of whatever caused the injury even though there is no specific evidence of an act of negligence, and without negligence the accident would not have happened...
    http://dictionary.law.com/default2.asp?typed=res+ipsa+l&type=3

    (I don't think this stuff was ever talked about on Matlock   :lol: )






Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Dana on December 02, 2007, 04:09:35 PM
Posted by Glenda at Ru:

Quote
You mean the fisherman who didn't report a crab trap stolen although that is the premise for the Million Dollar Search for Natalee. Did I read here that the owner of the boat was quoted saying her remains would still be intact because the water is sooo cold. What is the definition of Cold? Because this water is like a warm bathtub.


Question for Glenda:  When was the last time you dove to 1000 feet?   

Just to let everyone know I will be on the Crime And Punishment Radio show accross Canada tonight at 9:30pm et approx discussing the Holloway case.
For those of you not in Canada you can pick up the net feed of the show at http://www.cjob.com/ or leave comments at www.mikeoncrime.com
I believe there is a toll fee number you can call in during the show.
Now a favor can someone email me a timeline of events, it doenst have to be pages, i just want to make sure my dates are accurate.

Im not sure how long I will be on but I will try and cover as much as I can.

Dana


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 02, 2007, 04:11:27 PM
Well, now that we have that cleared up...back to my original question.

Why were these 2 particular security guards arrested as suspects in the first place?  I do not recall them being singled out by name by any of the 3 perps?  What prompted KJ to g o in like cowboys and take them from their homes?  What?  Why?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Spock on December 02, 2007, 04:11:56 PM
I would like to see that typed copy of the press release on the Judges decision to release Kalpoes again. Can someone put it ip? Thank You.
Still cant find it, it was a photo of the press release with the Judges ruling...
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/6ly4kyq.jpg)
Thanks Klaasend. This is my read on the ruling:

1. The new evidence places at least one of the Kalpoes back on the beach after the 3 am text messages

2. This information was obtained by bugging of the Kalpoe home and it is what I heard Tacopina blurt out on Fox.

3. The new evidence contains an admission by Joran that the girl was dead to an infiltrator.

4. The police now believe the body was taken to sea Monday evening and the cell phone called can be traced equally well to an offshore location as to the casino area the boys say they were at.

In addition to this new evidence, I believe both Guido and Steve were with the kalpoes and natalee that night.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2007, 04:12:56 PM
Posted by Glenda at Ru:

Quote
You mean the fisherman who didn't report a crab trap stolen although that is the premise for the Million Dollar Search for Natalee. Did I read here that the owner of the boat was quoted saying her remains would still be intact because the water is sooo cold. What is the definition of Cold? Because this water is like a warm bathtub.


Question for Glenda:  When was the last time you dove to 1000 feet?   

Just to let everyone know I will be on the Crime And Punishment Radio show accross Canada tonight at 9:30pm et approx discussing the Holloway case.
For those of you not in Canada you can pick up the net feed of the show at http://www.cjob.com/ or leave comments at www.mikeoncrime.com
I believe there is a toll fee number you can call in during the show.
Now a favor can someone email me a timeline of events, it doenst have to be pages, i just want to make sure my dates are accurate.

Im not sure how long I will be on but I will try and cover as much as I can.

Dana

Thanks Dana - I'll be sure to tune in!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2007, 04:14:38 PM
Spock - I read it the same way, thanks.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Blue Moon on December 02, 2007, 04:22:18 PM
Blue Moon
I am going to ask you a question now... Why did they arrest those particular 2 security guards?  Of all the people they had to choose from, there were more than just these two that worked as security  in that location...why were these two guys chosen?  Anyone have any idea? 

I believe the 2 security guards were arrested and put in there to help the police to monitor what J2K were blabbing in jail.  JMO but I do believe they could not take a chance of having those boys talking to anyone so they placed the guards (probably paid off to do this) in cells next to them to account for anything they might say.


Here is my answer to your question posted earlier.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 02, 2007, 04:25:53 PM
OK,  someone refresh my memory, please? Monday evening was what day in relation to the night she went missing?

Were Beth and Jug on the island Monday evening?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: wreck on December 02, 2007, 04:29:32 PM
OK,  someone refresh my memory, please? Monday evening was what day in relation to the night she went missing?

Were Beth and Jug on the island Monday evening?
Beth and Jug got to aruba Monday night about 10pm.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2007, 04:30:04 PM
OK,  someone refresh my memory, please? Monday evening was what day in relation to the night she went missing?

Were Beth and Jug on the island Monday evening?
Monday, May 30, 2005 - Natalee was seen getting into the car with JK2 at approx 1am

Monday, May 30, 2005 - Beth and Jug arrived in Aruba and starting looking for Joran.  At approx 3am (5/31/05) Beth and Jug arrived at the Sloot home but Joran was not there, was supposed to be at the casino per PVDS.  After going to the casino, Joran calls PVDS and says he's home.  Beth says Joran didn't look like he was dressed for a casino.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 02, 2007, 04:31:17 PM
Thank you, Wreck.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2007, 04:32:16 PM
So, it's entirely possible that instead of at any casino, Joran + Deepak + ? were in the process of disposing of Natalee's body at the time Beth and Jug arrived in Aruba.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 02, 2007, 04:35:06 PM
Thank you too, Klaas!

I was trying to figure out how the calls to Joran from Paulus, after Jug and Beth arrived, fit in. I was also remembering Jug's statement that if he had it to do over again, he would have just blocked Deepak's car in until someone opened the trunk.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Blue Moon on December 02, 2007, 04:42:02 PM
Could the boat be in the vacinity now and ready to search?  Seems really strange that all info was removed to be reviewed.  I know it is suppose to take 7-10 days for the trip but could they be there now (left early) and have started the search?  Just thinking out loud on this.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Spock on December 02, 2007, 04:44:52 PM
The Judge could not make the link between the killing and the destruction of evidence, so he released the kalpoes. I hope Mos files the appeal, at least that way three Judges will have to rule on releasing the Kalpoes.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 02, 2007, 04:46:03 PM
Blue Moon
I am going to ask you a question now... Why did they arrest those particular 2 security guards?  Of all the people they had to choose from, there were more than just these two that worked as security  in that location...why were these two guys chosen?  Anyone have any idea? 

I believe the 2 security guards were arrested and put in there to help the police to monitor what J2K were blabbing in jail.  JMO but I do believe they could not take a chance of having those boys talking to anyone so they placed the guards (probably paid off to do this) in cells next to them to account for anything they might say.


Here is my answer to your question posted earlier.

Thanks. I saw your answer earlier...I tend to agree...my only question is why were these 2 the most likely to yield to coercion by ALE in order to accomplish this goal?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Blue Moon on December 02, 2007, 04:49:13 PM
Blue Moon
I am going to ask you a question now... Why did they arrest those particular 2 security guards?  Of all the people they had to choose from, there were more than just these two that worked as security  in that location...why were these two guys chosen?  Anyone have any idea? 

I believe the 2 security guards were arrested and put in there to help the police to monitor what J2K were blabbing in jail.  JMO but I do believe they could not take a chance of having those boys talking to anyone so they placed the guards (probably paid off to do this) in cells next to them to account for anything they might say.


Here is my answer to your question posted earlier.

Thanks. I saw your answer earlier...I tend to agree...my only question is why were these 2 the most likely to yield to coercion by ALE in order to accomplish this goal?

Maybe because they Were seen hanging around the kids or maybe taking something of theirs.  If the police had something on them then would have been easy to bring them in and make them cover for the boys by listening to them and relaying what was said by them. OR maybe Paulus set them up so they could protect the three (J2K) while in jail/prison.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 02, 2007, 04:49:20 PM
So, it's entirely possible that instead of at any casino, Joran + Deepak + ? were in the process of disposing of Natalee's body at the time Beth and Jug arrived in Aruba.

Deepak's car was inside the fence when the "handlers" first found Joran's house.  By the time, everyone got organized and things arranged and the DEA agent had spoken to Charles Croes...the car in question was moved.  hmmmmm


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on December 02, 2007, 04:52:51 PM
In 40 degree water a person will be lucky to live one hour before they die of hypothermia. In 32 degree water under 15 minutes. Even in 60 degree water temp you will die in 6 hours.

BTW, refrigerators are usually set at 40 degress or below to sufficiently slow bacterial growth. Salt in the water also acts as a preservative.


Well, yes, I sort of knew that about refrigeration and salt, but was wondering what the temperatures were in the Caribbean as opposed to the Atlantic, Pacific, etc.


Was just throwing that out there for general consumption, Tyler. The closer to the equator the warmer the water, but judging from that chart after you get down to a certain level this diminishes quickly.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: MuffyBee on December 02, 2007, 04:54:36 PM
Blue Moon
I am going to ask you a question now... Why did they arrest those particular 2 security guards?  Of all the people they had to choose from, there were more than just these two that worked as security  in that location...why were these two guys chosen?  Anyone have any idea? 

I believe the 2 security guards were arrested and put in there to help the police to monitor what J2K were blabbing in jail.  JMO but I do believe they could not take a chance of having those boys talking to anyone so they placed the guards (probably paid off to do this) in cells next to them to account for anything they might say.


Here is my answer to your question posted earlier.

Thanks. I saw your answer earlier...I tend to agree...my only question is why were these 2 the most likely to yield to coercion by ALE in order to accomplish this goal?

Hadn't the 2 security guards been working at a hotel near the Holiday Inn where Natalee was supposedly dropped off by J2K?  IIRC the two security guards were laid off because the hotel was closed for remodeling?  And I am thinking back.  There was discussion at one time that perhaps Deepak had crossed the paths of the two security guards previously.  Shoot, it's been such a long time, but I remember some of the bit of discussion.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 02, 2007, 04:56:10 PM
Posted by Glenda at Ru:

Quote
You mean the fisherman who didn't report a crab trap stolen although that is the premise for the Million Dollar Search for Natalee. Did I read here that the owner of the boat was quoted saying her remains would still be intact because the water is sooo cold. What is the definition of Cold? Because this water is like a warm bathtub.


Question for Glenda:  When was the last time you dove to 1000 feet?   

Just to let everyone know I will be on the Crime And Punishment Radio show accross Canada tonight at 9:30pm et approx discussing the Holloway case.
For those of you not in Canada you can pick up the net feed of the show at http://www.cjob.com/ or leave comments at www.mikeoncrime.com
I believe there is a toll fee number you can call in during the show.
Now a favor can someone email me a timeline of events, it doenst have to be pages, i just want to make sure my dates are accurate.

Im not sure how long I will be on but I will try and cover as much as I can.

Dana

Thanks Dana - I'll be sure to tune in!

Are you going to send Dana the time line?  Please.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on December 02, 2007, 04:56:31 PM
So, it's entirely possible that instead of at any casino, Joran + Deepak + ? were in the process of disposing of Natalee's body at the time Beth and Jug arrived in Aruba.

Deepak's car was inside the fence when the "handlers" first found Joran's house.  By the time, everyone got organized and things arranged and the DEA agent had spoken to Charles Croes...the car in question was moved.  hmmmmm


Ever seen the three suspects queeried about Deepak's car being behind the fence at the Sloot residence 2:00 am in any of their statements? None we've seen. I'll bet that hasn't gone unnoticed by Mos and the Dutch investigators. Or maybe they did ask them and it's in the missing statements because they didn't want to incriminate them. I would like to see what they say about such an important piece of evidence.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 02, 2007, 04:57:37 PM
OK,  someone refresh my memory, please? Monday evening was what day in relation to the night she went missing?

Were Beth and Jug on the island Monday evening?

Monday eveningish-Tuesday morningish.  She went to C&C on Sunday night, left on Monday morning.  Beth was there within 24 hours of her leaving C&C.  Does that help?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 02, 2007, 04:58:11 PM
" Glenda " at RU is not an expert in marine temperates.
Unless she is speaking of a Hot Marine. LOL
.. The owners of this equipment are the experts and and if they make such statements, then I would listen.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 02, 2007, 04:58:32 PM
So, it's entirely possible that instead of at any casino, Joran + Deepak + ? were in the process of disposing of Natalee's body at the time Beth and Jug arrived in Aruba.

Exactly.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on December 02, 2007, 05:12:23 PM
We have not heard Greta address the judge's strong suspicions of Kalpoes "aiding and abetting in the cover-up of a serious crime and disposal of a corpse." You would think she'd like to confront Kock, Wix, and Tacoboy with that verbage. That round peg must not fit in her square hole.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: igsigs on December 02, 2007, 05:18:12 PM
Regarding Joran's lawyer and wild accusations (arms dealing?) - I'm thinking that the extra page in Joran's dossier has some a little nervous.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on December 02, 2007, 05:18:33 PM
Thank you too, Klaas!

I was trying to figure out how the calls to Joran from Paulus, after Jug and Beth arrived, fit in. I was also remembering Jug's statement that if he had it to do over again, he would have just blocked Deepak's car in until someone opened the trunk.


They never released Paulus' telephone records but we know these exist and that he was wiretapped. Rudy Croes told us there were very suspicious phone calls between Paulus and Van der Straten in the early goings. Mayhaps this is some of the "overlooked" evidence Mos spoke of. Mos does not seem to feel the love for Paulus that the original bunch does. Am sure he has these in the file.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on December 02, 2007, 05:24:51 PM
Regarding Joran's lawyer and wild accusations (arms dealing?) - I'm thinking that the extra page in Joran's dossier has some a little nervous.


He is a little late to the punch on that. The Arubans would have loved to have blame this on arms dealers, insurance scams, etc. and would have a long time ago but they had no evidence indicating such things. Their own friggin' top cop said it always goes back to the three.

When your client is guilty you resort to smoke and mirrors and blaming the victim. First thing out of Greaseball's mouth was that Natalee was over the top drunk, then he had to back-peddle when he found out Joran could be charged with rape. Defense lawyers are full of bullshit.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on December 02, 2007, 05:27:01 PM
Regarding Joran's lawyer and wild accusations (arms dealing?) - I'm thinking that the extra page in Joran's dossier has some a little nervous.


Just as we witnessed in Paulus lawsuit it only takes one little thing to tip the case. Mos no doubt has more, he's just not going to give those fleabag lawyers a head start.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Buckeye on December 02, 2007, 05:31:46 PM
Regarding Joran's lawyer and wild accusations (arms dealing?) - I'm thinking that the extra page in Joran's dossier has some a little nervous.

The team does seem to be chatting up a US conspiracy angle.  I would love to see Greta read the line to Joe and ask him if that is going to be his "client's" defense......especially if he's being "retained".


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: WhiskeyGirl on December 02, 2007, 05:37:53 PM
Regarding Joran's lawyer and wild accusations (arms dealing?) - I'm thinking that the extra page in Joran's dossier has some a little nervous.

The team does seem to be chatting up a US conspiracy angle.  I would love to see Greta read the line to Joe and ask him if that is going to be his "client's" defense......especially if he's being "retained".

I wonder if the case will makes its way into Dutch legal text books.  What might the next generation of Dutch lawyers and judges learn from this?  From family van der Sloot?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: robots on December 02, 2007, 05:43:27 PM
here is a little News Flash for Hans

1. GOT GET JORAN

if you get joran you will automatically get K2

if you Get K2 you will get Paulus


thats the way to do it  :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 02, 2007, 05:50:33 PM
So, it's entirely possible that instead of at any casino, Joran + Deepak + ? were in the process of disposing of Natalee's body at the time Beth and Jug arrived in Aruba.

Exactly.

If you remember, they were no where to be found during the wild goose chase that Paulus took them on that night...car was inside the gate...care was outside gate in the end...they were too busy to be gambling.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 02, 2007, 05:55:39 PM
I believe the 2 security guards were arrested and put in there to help the police to monitor what J2K were blabbing in jail.  JMO but I do believe they could not take a chance of having those boys talking to anyone so they placed the guards (probably paid off to do this) in cells next to them to account for anything they might say.
I disagee in the most polite and monkey like fashion.
IMO those two were arrested to see how it would fly and if Beth and Jug and Dave had not been there and done some of their own research into the facts and knew better, it would have been life for those two. Beth was the driving force on the CNN news channels in getting these two guys released. The families of the two guards were not treated in the same fashion as the Kalpoes or the Sloots. I do remember one of their mothers being on CNN and she was being told absolutely nothing by the ALE. I don't even think she was told where her son was. The guards familes had no inside track in the Justice Ministry.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Katysmom on December 02, 2007, 05:58:08 PM
I believe the 2 security guards were arrested and put in there to help the police to monitor what J2K were blabbing in jail.  JMO but I do believe they could not take a chance of having those boys talking to anyone so they placed the guards (probably paid off to do this) in cells next to them to account for anything they might say.
I disagee in the most polite and monkey like fashion.
IMO those two were arrested to see how it would fly and if Beth and Jug and Dave had not been there and done some of their own research into the facts and knew better, it would have been life for those two. Beth was the driving force on the CNN news channels in getting these two guys released. The families of the two guards were not treated in the same fashion as the Kalpoes or the Sloots. I do remember one of their mothers being on CNN and she was being told absolutely nothing by the ALE. I don't even think she was told where her son was. The guards familes had no inside track in the Justice Ministry.

I have to agree with Kat.  Considering the way Aruba looks down on blacks (and women), the 2 black men would of been the 'easy out' for Aruba.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 02, 2007, 06:09:54 PM


oops!!!
http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/americas/12/01/aruba.holloway/


thanks LD......shows once again what a vile evil person renHO is.....they met with Mos for approximately one hour and about 3 with the interrogators....not being interrogated for 6 hours as renHO states....I hope that witches tongue rots right out of her ugly mouth!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 02, 2007, 06:10:19 PM
I believe the 2 security guards were arrested and put in there to help the police to monitor what J2K were blabbing in jail.  JMO but I do believe they could not take a chance of having those boys talking to anyone so they placed the guards (probably paid off to do this) in cells next to them to account for anything they might say.
I disagee in the most polite and monkey like fashion.
IMO those two were arrested to see how it would fly and if Beth and Jug and Dave had not been there and done some of their own research into the facts and knew better, it would have been life for those two. Beth was the driving force on the CNN news channels in getting these two guys released. The families of the two guards were not treated in the same fashion as the Kalpoes or the Sloots. I do remember one of their mothers being on CNN and she was being told absolutely nothing by the ALE. I don't even think she was told where her son was. The guards familes had no inside track in the Justice Ministry.

I have to agree with Kat.  Considering the way Aruba looks down on blacks (and women), the 2 black men would of been the 'easy out' for Aruba.

But....what prompted KJ to arrest them?  What caused those two out of several to be the ones that got arrested?  I am not claiming any inside knowledge here..just wondering why they were the ones and not some other black guards.  They weren't the only ones that fit the description.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 02, 2007, 06:10:21 PM
Posted by Glenda at Ru:

Quote
You mean the fisherman who didn't report a crab trap stolen although that is the premise for the Million Dollar Search for Natalee. Did I read here that the owner of the boat was quoted saying her remains would still be intact because the water is sooo cold. What is the definition of Cold? Because this water is like a warm bathtub.


Question for Glenda:  When was the last time you dove to 1000 feet?   

I'm behind, but didn't Dr. Baden make the statement about the body being preserved in cold, deep water?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 02, 2007, 06:11:54 PM
I think it's very interesting that we HAVEN'T heard a word from the family.  Very different approach this time around.
Good point!
I think we would hear about it if they were not 100% convinced it was legitimate this time around.

Wreck that ran through my mind as well...and then again as long as the killer is in jail I don't think Beth will say a word....but I hope we hear something from JQK before too much longer


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 02, 2007, 06:13:09 PM
Posted by Glenda at Ru:

Quote
You mean the fisherman who didn't report a crab trap stolen although that is the premise for the Million Dollar Search for Natalee. Did I read here that the owner of the boat was quoted saying her remains would still be intact because the water is sooo cold. What is the definition of Cold? Because this water is like a warm bathtub.


Question for Glenda:  When was the last time you dove to 1000 feet?   

I'm behind, but didn't Dr. Baden make the statement about the body being preserved in cold, deep water?

As you astute monkeys have pointed out..it was Dompig that mentioned the crab trap that was stolen...so does that mean the Glenda is calling Dompig a liar?  :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 02, 2007, 06:13:15 PM


oops!!!
http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/americas/12/01/aruba.holloway/


thanks LD......shows once again what a vile evil person renHO is.....they met with Mos for approximately one hour and about 3 with the interrogators....not being interrogated for 6 hours as renHO states....I hope that witches tongue rots right out of her ugly mouth!!

you are starting to show an evil streak like me..lol!!

I think it was VERY INTERESTING!!! they spent most of their time with the interrogators!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Anna on December 02, 2007, 06:13:28 PM
I think the security guards were arrested because Deepak ID'ed one of them from the security tape from the hotel where they were working.  Abraham Johns.  MJ was later hauled in as well because he shared a shift sometimes with AJ and they had been known to hang out together.

Has been speculated that J2K picked those particular guards because they passed them frequently going to and from the HI Excelsior casino.

At one time the SPECULATION was further plans were to plant things along their routine patrol route but that seemed to be abandoned in favor of perhaps rock painting for a crime scene.

Just my opinion as it's been far too long to still have links.  At least for me and doesn't seem to matter any more any way.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 02, 2007, 06:14:17 PM
Sorry, 2NJ, I messed up that quote thingy again...gosh! :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 02, 2007, 06:15:02 PM
I have the link to the Crime and Punishmnet radio show open. You have to click Download now. Slows things down here, but I wanted to test it out. Will look fwd to listening.
My young ppl are in Florida right now, I voluntered to shovel snow over there when there was not a sno flake in sight. So of course it has been snowing like crazy.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 02, 2007, 06:15:36 PM
Posted by Glenda at Ru:

Quote
You mean the fisherman who didn't report a crab trap stolen although that is the premise for the Million Dollar Search for Natalee. Did I read here that the owner of the boat was quoted saying her remains would still be intact because the water is sooo cold. What is the definition of Cold? Because this water is like a warm bathtub.


Question for Glenda:  When was the last time you dove to 1000 feet?   

she has never dove that deep...but she has sunk a whole lot lower.....b/witch


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: MuffyBee on December 02, 2007, 06:16:01 PM
I think the security guards were arrested because Deepak ID'ed one of them from the security tape from the hotel where they were working.  Abraham Johns.  MJ was later hauled in as well because he shared a shift sometimes with AJ and they had been known to hang out together.

Has been speculated that J2K picked those particular guards because they passed them frequently going to and from the HI Excelsior casino.

At one time the SPECULATION was further plans were to plant things along their routine patrol route but that seemed to be abandoned in favor of perhaps rock painting for a crime scene.

Just my opinion as it's been far too long to still have links.  At least for me and doesn't seem to matter any more any way.

.

Anna ~  I agree with you, and made a similiar post a couple pages back.  (It's a biotch being invisible)  I thought too that the two security guards had been working at a hotel very near the Holiday Inn.  That hotel was closed for remodel, and I was thinking the two guards were laid off at the time or were just doing security near there.  Can't remember, it's been a while.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: robots on December 02, 2007, 06:18:21 PM
aruba is a hell hole



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Stom on December 02, 2007, 06:18:48 PM
I believe the 2 security guards were arrested and put in there to help the police to monitor what J2K were blabbing in jail.  JMO but I do believe they could not take a chance of having those boys talking to anyone so they placed the guards (probably paid off to do this) in cells next to them to account for anything they might say.
I disagee in the most polite and monkey like fashion.
IMO those two were arrested to see how it would fly and if Beth and Jug and Dave had not been there and done some of their own research into the facts and knew better, it would have been life for those two. Beth was the driving force on the CNN news channels in getting these two guys released. The families of the two guards were not treated in the same fashion as the Kalpoes or the Sloots. I do remember one of their mothers being on CNN and she was being told absolutely nothing by the ALE. I don't even think she was told where her son was. The guards familes had no inside track in the Justice Ministry.

I have to agree with Kat.  Considering the way Aruba looks down on blacks (and women), the 2 black men would of been the 'easy out' for Aruba.

Race did not have a significant role in the arrest of Antonius Johns and Abraham Jones.  The fact that Johns is from Grenada and Jones from Bonaire probably did make them more vulnerable to becoming “dispensable” in the eyes of the police investigators, because they are immigrants.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 02, 2007, 06:19:20 PM
Posted by Glenda at Ru:

Quote
You mean the fisherman who didn't report a crab trap stolen although that is the premise for the Million Dollar Search for Natalee. Did I read here that the owner of the boat was quoted saying her remains would still be intact because the water is sooo cold. What is the definition of Cold? Because this water is like a warm bathtub.


Question for Glenda:  When was the last time you dove to 1000 feet?   

I'm behind, but didn't Dr. Baden make the statement about the body being preserved in cold, deep water?

Yes, but then we know Glenda is more knowledgeable of technology, pathology, forensics, global warming, art, hardware, contracting, stockmarket and especially murder and mayhem than all people put together, either alive or dead on the planet at this moment.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Anna on December 02, 2007, 06:22:58 PM
Of course, should Natalee's remains be found, then the emissaries of hell will claim it was planted to be found.  I hope they have an impeccable witness aboard and video everything.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: MuffyBee on December 02, 2007, 06:23:45 PM
I believe the 2 security guards were arrested and put in there to help the police to monitor what J2K were blabbing in jail.  JMO but I do believe they could not take a chance of having those boys talking to anyone so they placed the guards (probably paid off to do this) in cells next to them to account for anything they might say.
I disagee in the most polite and monkey like fashion.
IMO those two were arrested to see how it would fly and if Beth and Jug and Dave had not been there and done some of their own research into the facts and knew better, it would have been life for those two. Beth was the driving force on the CNN news channels in getting these two guys released. The families of the two guards were not treated in the same fashion as the Kalpoes or the Sloots. I do remember one of their mothers being on CNN and she was being told absolutely nothing by the ALE. I don't even think she was told where her son was. The guards familes had no inside track in the Justice Ministry.

I have to agree with Kat.  Considering the way Aruba looks down on blacks (and women), the 2 black men would of been the 'easy out' for Aruba.

Race did not have a significant role in the arrest of Antonius Johns and Abraham Jones.  The fact that Johns is from Grenada and Jones from Bonaire probably did make them more vulnerable to becoming “dispensable” in the eyes of the police investigators, because they are immigrants.

Oh really. Hmmm.  I saw the photos of the two security guards being dragged out of their houses early in the a.m. in their boxers and handcuffs.  IIRC, that wasn't the case for Joran. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: robots on December 02, 2007, 06:26:01 PM
Aruba will look even more EVIL than ever, if Hans Mos does not
do the right thing and get this to trial and get a conviction.

Aruba can pay now or they can pay later,  when you pay later
you always PAY more in the long run.

Not to mention the DUTCH will be forever linked to the CORRUPT aruba police and
dept and law enforcement

what you say Hans ?

you want to be linked with the likes of DOMPIG, PAULUS, JOE T. JORAN
and K2 !!
 
you like the sound of that? want youre kids to grow up and read how inept you were
when it is crystal clear what happened ?

come on Hans. show some guts - nobody on aruba has any

 :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: islanders on December 02, 2007, 06:27:01 PM
I think the K2 will be rearrested tomorrow.

They were too involved that night with the main suspect to be given any benefit of doubt as to the limits of their participation.

They should be fully questioned.

I would assume the Dutch are more offended than Americans.

This BS isn't going to fly long.

This is their problem and they need to deal with it.






Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Anna on December 02, 2007, 06:27:30 PM
I believe the 2 security guards were arrested and put in there to help the police to monitor what J2K were blabbing in jail.  JMO but I do believe they could not take a chance of having those boys talking to anyone so they placed the guards (probably paid off to do this) in cells next to them to account for anything they might say.
I disagee in the most polite and monkey like fashion.
IMO those two were arrested to see how it would fly and if Beth and Jug and Dave had not been there and done some of their own research into the facts and knew better, it would have been life for those two. Beth was the driving force on the CNN news channels in getting these two guys released. The families of the two guards were not treated in the same fashion as the Kalpoes or the Sloots. I do remember one of their mothers being on CNN and she was being told absolutely nothing by the ALE. I don't even think she was told where her son was. The guards families had no inside track in the Justice Ministry.

I have to agree with Kat.  Considering the way Aruba looks down on blacks (and women), the 2 black men would of been the 'easy out' for Aruba.

Race did not have a significant role in the arrest of Antonius Johns and Abraham Jones.  The fact that Johns is from Grenada and Jones from Bonaire probably did make them more vulnerable to becoming “dispensable” in the eyes of the police investigators, because they are immigrants.

Oh really. Hmmm.  I saw the photos of the two security guards being dragged out of their houses early in the a.m. in their boxers and handcuffs.  IIRC, that wasn't the case for Joran. 


Sure wasn't, muffybee.  And I think the fact that they were black was supposed to appeal to Hitler's sister's daughter as well, given her known racist tendencies.  Deepak has been told Natalee called them slaves so guess that also gave him the idea to select a couple of black people to go along with the Plantation mentality of the Alabama Delegation.  Course he got that little tidbit from Joran telling him Natalee said that.  Joran's way of trying to make Deepak hate Natalee.  And also a good reflection of Joran's prejudices as well instead of all the others he tries to cast aspersions upon.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Katysmom on December 02, 2007, 06:28:12 PM
I believe the 2 security guards were arrested and put in there to help the police to monitor what J2K were blabbing in jail.  JMO but I do believe they could not take a chance of having those boys talking to anyone so they placed the guards (probably paid off to do this) in cells next to them to account for anything they might say.
I disagee in the most polite and monkey like fashion.
IMO those two were arrested to see how it would fly and if Beth and Jug and Dave had not been there and done some of their own research into the facts and knew better, it would have been life for those two. Beth was the driving force on the CNN news channels in getting these two guys released. The families of the two guards were not treated in the same fashion as the Kalpoes or the Sloots. I do remember one of their mothers being on CNN and she was being told absolutely nothing by the ALE. I don't even think she was told where her son was. The guards familes had no inside track in the Justice Ministry.

I have to agree with Kat.  Considering the way Aruba looks down on blacks (and women), the 2 black men would of been the 'easy out' for Aruba.

But....what prompted KJ to arrest them?  What caused those two out of several to be the ones that got arrested?  I am not claiming any inside knowledge here..just wondering why they were the ones and not some other black guards.  They weren't the only ones that fit the description.

Could it of been because they were working that night?  I don't remember exactly when they got laid off; if it was before or after the night Natalee disappeared.  Surely Klaas knows :D


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 02, 2007, 06:28:35 PM
I believe the 2 security guards were arrested and put in there to help the police to monitor what J2K were blabbing in jail.  JMO but I do believe they could not take a chance of having those boys talking to anyone so they placed the guards (probably paid off to do this) in cells next to them to account for anything they might say.
I disagee in the most polite and monkey like fashion.
IMO those two were arrested to see how it would fly and if Beth and Jug and Dave had not been there and done some of their own research into the facts and knew better, it would have been life for those two. Beth was the driving force on the CNN news channels in getting these two guys released. The families of the two guards were not treated in the same fashion as the Kalpoes or the Sloots. I do remember one of their mothers being on CNN and she was being told absolutely nothing by the ALE. I don't even think she was told where her son was. The guards familes had no inside track in the Justice Ministry.

I have to agree with Kat.  Considering the way Aruba looks down on blacks (and women), the 2 black men would of been the 'easy out' for Aruba.

But....what prompted KJ to arrest them?  What caused those two out of several to be the ones that got arrested?  I am not claiming any inside knowledge here..just wondering why they were the ones and not some other black guards.  They weren't the only ones that fit the description.
Because their faces were known around the HI. It was Deepak / Joran / Satish who provided the story and the Ale went with it. If it hadn't been them, it would have been someone else who was around the hotels frequently. KJ as a prosecutor relied on the police to provide the information. The ALE were Van Der Stratten and Jacobs. Did Van Der Stratten go to see or talk on the phone with either of the guards families and give them a heads up ? My memory is good when it comes to the visual things I see and I watched this unfold on CNN and thought to myself, are they crazy in Aruba ? That was before the all the connections to the Sloot family and the OM and the ALE became public knowledge.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: robots on December 02, 2007, 06:29:13 PM
replay of greta today

the delicious sporter admitted they went to his house but didnt go in.. :roll:

sureeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Anna on December 02, 2007, 06:29:49 PM
Also didn't some news station get a huge fine for filming the Sporter in his briefs?  Money believed in part given to Joran for his bragging of how much money he made while sitting in jail?

No such deal for the hapless security guards.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2007, 06:30:05 PM
I think the K2 will be rearrested tomorrow.

They were too involved that night with the main suspect to be given any benefit of doubt as to the limits of their participation.

They should be fully questioned.

I would assume the Dutch are more offended than Americans.

This BS isn't going to fly long.

This is their problem and they need to deal with it.






I like the way you think!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 02, 2007, 06:30:14 PM


oops!!!
http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/americas/12/01/aruba.holloway/


thanks LD......shows once again what a vile evil person renHO is.....they met with Mos for approximately one hour and about 3 with the interrogators....not being interrogated for 6 hours as renHO states....I hope that witches tongue rots right out of her ugly mouth!!

you are starting to show an evil streak like me..lol!!

I think it was VERY INTERESTING!!! they spent most of their time with the interrogators!!!

LOL......as long as I don't drink wine like you, Ill be OK :lol: I am sure the interrogators were very interested in all the info Beth and Dave and JQK had to offer


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 02, 2007, 06:33:18 PM
I believe the 2 security guards were arrested and put in there to help the police to monitor what J2K were blabbing in jail.  JMO but I do believe they could not take a chance of having those boys talking to anyone so they placed the guards (probably paid off to do this) in cells next to them to account for anything they might say.
I disagee in the most polite and monkey like fashion.
IMO those two were arrested to see how it would fly and if Beth and Jug and Dave had not been there and done some of their own research into the facts and knew better, it would have been life for those two. Beth was the driving force on the CNN news channels in getting these two guys released. The families of the two guards were not treated in the same fashion as the Kalpoes or the Sloots. I do remember one of their mothers being on CNN and she was being told absolutely nothing by the ALE. I don't even think she was told where her son was. The guards familes had no inside track in the Justice Ministry.

I agree...especially since the 2 security guards were taken into custody on 6/5/05 and held for a few days before J2K were brought in....unless they were in seminars on how-to eavesdrop or get J2K to talk.. :) 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 02, 2007, 06:33:24 PM


Anna ~  I agree with you, and made a similiar post a couple pages back.  (It's a biotch being invisible)  I thought too that the two security guards had been working at a hotel very near the Holiday Inn.  That hotel was closed for remodel, and I was thinking the two guards were laid off at the time or were just doing security near there.  Can't remember, it's been a while.

muffy....you are not invisible.....I promise you that....I am scurrying trying to catch up from early this afternoon...I agree with your post....IIRC they were laid off.....and they had been bumming smokes and drinks from the tourists....and trying to hit on the young girls


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 02, 2007, 06:36:08 PM
And I sincerley hope that any information gleaned in this meeting is not made public.
I also hope they never used a phone in Aruba. Glenda can speculate all she wants, unless she was a fly on the wall she knows sh*&.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 02, 2007, 06:37:32 PM
I think the security guards were arrested because Deepak ID'ed one of them from the security tape from the hotel where they were working.  Abraham Johns.  MJ was later hauled in as well because he shared a shift sometimes with AJ and they had been known to hang out together.

Has been speculated that J2K picked those particular guards because they passed them frequently going to and from the HI Excelsior casino.

At one time the SPECULATION was further plans were to plant things along their routine patrol route but that seemed to be abandoned in favor of perhaps rock painting for a crime scene.

Just my opinion as it's been far too long to still have links.  At least for me and doesn't seem to matter any more any way.

.

Anna ~  I agree with you, and made a similiar post a couple pages back.  (It's a biotch being invisible)  I thought too that the two security guards had been working at a hotel very near the Holiday Inn.  That hotel was closed for remodel, and I was thinking the two guards were laid off at the time or were just doing security near there.  Can't remember, it's been a while.

Allegro was the hotel....I see you buzzing around... :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Buckeye on December 02, 2007, 06:38:40 PM
msmarples and all

Found a full English copy of the letter Art Woods had published in Diario.  You need to scroll a little down past the black backround and the very white newspaper backround will display.

http://renevannie.com/inhoud/kritisch/_kritisch.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Anna on December 02, 2007, 06:38:45 PM
Tyler,
Thank you for those most eloquent posts this morning.  I have read back and they did not fall on deaf ears.  You are spot on as always from my vantage point.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 02, 2007, 06:39:15 PM


Yes, but then we know Glenda is more knowledgeable of technology, pathology, forensics, global warming, art, hardware, contracting, stockmarket and especially murder and mayhem than all people put together, either alive or dead on the planet at this moment.

I hate to disagrre with Tyler...but IMO the only thing renHo has any knowledge of is what she can do on her back or her knees :shock:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: San on December 02, 2007, 06:39:24 PM
I think the K2 will be rearrested tomorrow.

They were too involved that night with the main suspect to be given any benefit of doubt as to the limits of their participation.

They should be fully questioned.

I would assume the Dutch are more offended than Americans.

This BS isn't going to fly long.

This is their problem and they need to deal with it.


I do not believe they will be rearrested.  But then again I could be wrong because stranger things have happened.  Kalpoes pack your baggies.

The only time the so called Dutch were offended in this case was when Beth came to Aruba and handed the Sloots on a silver platter in her daughters disappeareance.  How dare she accuse this nice well known Dutch family.  Van der Straaten and Karin Janssen were highly offended.

I agree this is their problem and they need to fix what they created in the first place.  In the words of Deepak Kalpoe "enough of this BS already".  Bring them to trial for the voluntary manslaughter and throw in Kidnapping and Rape.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 02, 2007, 06:40:40 PM
And I sincerley hope that any information gleaned in this meeting is not made public.
I also hope they never used a phone in Aruba. Glenda can speculate all she wants, unless she was a fly on the wall she knows sh*&.

Amen Kat....Amen......


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Buckeye on December 02, 2007, 06:40:48 PM
I think the boys were being quite clever and described the apparel of The Soul Beach guards.  I think it backfired on them.  Didn't Mickey have on a black coat that night??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 02, 2007, 06:42:50 PM

They never released Paulus' telephone records but we know these exist and that he was wiretapped. Rudy Croes told us there were very suspicious phone calls between Paulus and Van der Straten in the early goings. Mayhaps this is some of the "overlooked" evidence Mos spoke of. Mos does not seem to feel the love for Paulus that the original bunch does.  Am sure he has these in the file.


Dayhiker ... I have only located one quote of Hans Mos that references ... the Father.  I must have missing something.

I cannot imagine any "new" wiretap and textmessage evidence that would not implicate Paulus along with Joran, Deepak and Satish.  I cannot imagine any "re-examination" of existing evidence which would not implicate Paulus along with Joran, Deepak and Satish.  Yet ... Paulus was not detained along with the other three.

I have read over many of Hanns Mos statements to the media as well as his words in the Greta interview.  In my opinion ... there is a deafening silence by Hans Mos in regards to Paulus ... there is an appearance that Paulus is off topic.

Janet

++++++++++++++++++++

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,313168,00.html
Hans Mos
On the Record w/ Greta


And what we think is very important, at least the Dutch suspect, instead of the two Surinams, and his father, who was one way or another involved in this case, has said in interviews that they are willing to talk. They are willing to disclose what happened in the past at a time set by them. And we think it is very important that this is the time to disclose this information to the public and to us because their point of view is, their son or this suspect, this Dutch suspect, didn't do anything, but he has information and he doesn't give it. We think that's unthinkable.


http://www.wtop.com/?sid=1296839&nid=105
Associated Press
November 24, 2007


Investigators are focusing in part on cell phone calls and text messages between the suspects, prosecutor Dop Kruimel told The Associated Press.

"It's part of the investigation," she said, declining to give further details. "We do everything we can to see what happened."

Van der Sloot will appear before a judge on Monday, Aruba's chief prosecutor Hans Mos told the AP.


http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/americas/11/30/aruba.holloway/index.html
Hans Mos
CNN
November 30, 2007


Mos has told CNN he believes authorities have enough evidence to prove Holloway is dead, even if her body is never found. He has suggested her death was an accident.

The new evidence against the three men was gathered from advanced techniques used to re-examine existing information, including cell phone records and text messages exchanged the night Holloway disappeared, Mos has said.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 02, 2007, 06:50:42 PM
msmarples and all

Found a full English copy of the letter Art Woods had published in Diario.  You need to scroll a little down past the black backround and the very white newspaper backround will display.

http://renevannie.com/inhoud/kritisch/_kritisch.html

Thanks...much appreciated


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Blonde on December 02, 2007, 06:58:41 PM
Someone  emailed this  to me it's from Robin Holloway
I think she talking about Mark in aruba not Mark F
If you already have it you can delete it TY

Dave is currently on his way home to Meridian. Beth is on her way back also. They met with the KLPD and OM yesterday. I guess there is a miscommunication between interrogation and questioning. They had a lot of questions for Dave and Beth in efforts to help Natalee’s case and dispel a lot of nasty rumours. Also, Dave and Beth had a lot of questions for them too in regards to Natalee’s case. The meeting went well and they are working hard, but we don’t know what will happen next and pray this water search will turn up something. As far as Julia, we have stayed in contact with her and she truly does care for Natalee and wants to know what happened to her as much as anyone else. Dave was able to meet with Mark for a little while last night while he was there and had a nice visit. It is good to know they are still there and willing to help. Please know they are still there too for Natalee.

For now, waiting on Dave to get home and will watch the news or wait on that phone call to see what will happen next. It’s been a long two and a half years and never dreamed this much time would go by with no answers. Thanks to all of you for your continued support and for hanging in there with us. Thank you Debbie for coming to Meridian to hang out with the girls, Matt and me. I was a nervous wreck and glad you were able to make time for us this weekend. Brooke just got in from a playdate and was upset she didn’t get to say goodbye Sad I don’t think she realized you would be gone before she got home.

The boat should be in Aruba depending on the weather between Thurs and Saturday. Will keep you updated.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on December 02, 2007, 06:59:38 PM

They never released Paulus' telephone records but we know these exist and that he was wiretapped. Rudy Croes told us there were very suspicious phone calls between Paulus and Van der Straten in the early goings. Mayhaps this is some of the "overlooked" evidence Mos spoke of. Mos does not seem to feel the love for Paulus that the original bunch does.  Am sure he has these in the file.


Dayhiker ... I have only located one quote of Hans Mos that references ... the Father.  I must have missing something.

I cannot imagine any "new" wiretap and textmessage evidence that would not implicate Paulus along with Joran, Deepak and Satish.  I cannot imagine any "re-examination" of existing evidence which would not implicate Paulus along with Joran, Deepak and Satish.  Yet ... Paulus was not detained along with the other three.

I have read over many of Hanns Mos statements to the media as well as his words in the Greta interview.  In my opinion ... there is a deafening silence by Hans Mos in regards to Paulus ... there is an appearance that Paulus is off topic.

Janet



Correct Janet, that is the quote I was referencing.

And what we think is very important, at least the Dutch suspect, instead of the two Surinams, and his father, who was one way or another involved in this case, has said in interviews that they are willing to talk.


I wouldn't expect Mos to say much about Paulus until he is arrested again.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Puzzler on December 02, 2007, 07:00:09 PM
replay of greta today

the delicious sporter admitted they went to his house but didnt go in.. :roll:

sureeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee..


I believe Paulus has MUCH involvement.  I can't get that picture of him at the casino talking to Natalee out of my mind.  Maybe Paulus was the one who had so much interest in Natalee at first.  Joran is very protective about his father.  Maybe Paulus was more involved in the beginning and that is why he was willing to help 2K so much (meeting, planning, attorneys, etc.).  It think they did go to Joran's house BUT that they DID go inside. 



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 02, 2007, 07:02:03 PM
Of course, should Natalee's remains be found, then the emissaries of hell will claim it was planted to be found.  I hope they have an impeccable witness aboard and video everything.




Oh Anna...they already think that. They think this ship is carrying Natalee out to sea to be planted...didn't you know?  :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on December 02, 2007, 07:02:31 PM
Posted by Glenda at Ru:

Quote
You mean the fisherman who didn't report a crab trap stolen although that is the premise for the Million Dollar Search for Natalee. Did I read here that the owner of the boat was quoted saying her remains would still be intact because the water is sooo cold. What is the definition of Cold? Because this water is like a warm bathtub.


Question for Glenda:  When was the last time you dove to 1000 feet?   

I'm behind, but didn't Dr. Baden make the statement about the body being preserved in cold, deep water?

Yes 2NJ - I have heard Dr Baden make this statement more than once on FOX.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on December 02, 2007, 07:05:16 PM
" Glenda " at RU is not an expert in marine temperates.
Unless she is speaking of a Hot Marine. LOL
.. The owners of this equipment are the experts and and if they make such statements, then I would listen.


So true Kat_Gram.
BTW it is nice to see you posting also.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: private eye on December 02, 2007, 07:05:37 PM
I know that anyone in Beth's family would agree to be interrogated for an eternity if it would help Mos do his job. IF THERE IS ANY INFORMATION THE FAMILY COULD POSSIBLY POSSESS THAT WOULD MOVE THIS CASE FORWARD I AM SURE THEY PRAY THAT MOS IS INTELLIGENT ENOUGH TO ASK THEM THE CORRECT QUESTION THAT WILL GENERATE THE NEEDED ANSWER. NOTHING WOULD BE OFF LIMITS.

However, I still think Mos is on track by prosecuting the brothers as that process is the most probable course to extracting the truth about what happened to Natalee. Three years to the brothers is a life time, and anything they can do to mitigate the time they have to serve they will do. Maybe Aruba doesn't have "plea bargaining" as we do, but I guarantee that cooperation with the authorities results in lighter sentences. I hope everyone will support Mos efforts, keep him politically strong and personally interested, and keep our expectations of him high so that Natalee's friends can only a part of the solution and not an excuse for the failure. People are people the world over and people are motivated by public support and the expectations people have of them, so lets give Mos all of that we have got. He has expressed his interest, demonstrated his passion, and is all we have as of now.

Well, at least I have 3 cents left after spewing my 2 cents worth.

PS My real reason for hope is that RU and those misfits still are not celebrating as one would think.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 02, 2007, 07:05:44 PM

I think the boys were being quite clever and described the apparel of The Soul Beach guards.  I think it backfired on them.  Didn't Mickey have on a black coat that night??

The only thing ... the security guards were not working on the evening/ morning when Natalee Holloway went missing.

Janet

+++++++++++++++++++++++

Chris LeJuez - Abraham Jones' Attorney
NANCY GRACE
June 9, 2005


LEJUEZ: My client`s alibi he is that went to a soul music festival at another beach far away from the Holiday Inn hotel. He was there with his wife, with his friend, and he saw many friends there. They were together when he went home, and they spent the night together at home. The next morning, he woke up and went to work at around 7:00 o`clock in the morning, a very believable and confirmed alibi.


Noraina Pietersz - Mickey John's Attorney
NANCY GRACE
June 9, 2005


PIETERSZ: Well, he has an alibi, but the problem is, he has nobody to verify it because his mother was at home. She was sleeping. And like she said, he`s a grown-up man. She doesn`t really control and check on the time he gets home. So he doesn`t have somebody that can say, Oh, yes, he was home at such time. That`s the only thing. But the fact is that he was not at the Holiday Inn. He was never seen at that time during the disappearance at the Holiday Inn. He was not working. He didn`t have a uniform, so it could never be him, the man that these two now suspects are talking about.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2007, 07:07:57 PM
Someone  emailed this  to me it's from Robin Holloway
I think she talking about Mark in aruba not Mark F
If you already have it you can delete it TY

Dave is currently on his way home to Meridian. Beth is on her way back also. They met with the KLPD and OM yesterday. I guess there is a miscommunication between interrogation and questioning. They had a lot of questions for Dave and Beth in efforts to help Natalee’s case and dispel a lot of nasty rumours. Also, Dave and Beth had a lot of questions for them too in regards to Natalee’s case. The meeting went well and they are working hard, but we don’t know what will happen next and pray this water search will turn up something. As far as Julia, we have stayed in contact with her and she truly does care for Natalee and wants to know what happened to her as much as anyone else. Dave was able to meet with Mark for a little while last night while he was there and had a nice visit. It is good to know they are still there and willing to help. Please know they are still there too for Natalee.

For now, waiting on Dave to get home and will watch the news or wait on that phone call to see what will happen next. It’s been a long two and a half years and never dreamed this much time would go by with no answers. Thanks to all of you for your continued support and for hanging in there with us. Thank you Debbie for coming to Meridian to hang out with the girls, Matt and me. I was a nervous wreck and glad you were able to make time for us this weekend. Brooke just got in from a playdate and was upset she didn’t get to say goodbye Sad I don’t think she realized you would be gone before she got home.

The boat should be in Aruba depending on the weather between Thurs and Saturday. Will keep you updated.



Sorry but I call BS on the red highlighted above.  I think it's a huge problem to trust Julia Renfro or Mark Purcell.  I doubt Beth does.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on December 02, 2007, 07:09:09 PM
I believe the 2 security guards were arrested and put in there to help the police to monitor what J2K were blabbing in jail.  JMO but I do believe they could not take a chance of having those boys talking to anyone so they placed the guards (probably paid off to do this) in cells next to them to account for anything they might say.
I disagee in the most polite and monkey like fashion.
IMO those two were arrested to see how it would fly and if Beth and Jug and Dave had not been there and done some of their own research into the facts and knew better, it would have been life for those two. Beth was the driving force on the CNN news channels in getting these two guys released. The families of the two guards were not treated in the same fashion as the Kalpoes or the Sloots. I do remember one of their mothers being on CNN and she was being told absolutely nothing by the ALE. I don't even think she was told where her son was. The guards families had no inside track in the Justice Ministry.

I have to agree with Kat.  Considering the way Aruba looks down on blacks (and women), the 2 black men would of been the 'easy out' for Aruba.

Race did not have a significant role in the arrest of Antonius Johns and Abraham Jones.  The fact that Johns is from Grenada and Jones from Bonaire probably did make them more vulnerable to becoming “dispensable” in the eyes of the police investigators, because they are immigrants.

Oh really. Hmmm.  I saw the photos of the two security guards being dragged out of their houses early in the a.m. in their boxers and handcuffs.  IIRC, that wasn't the case for Joran. 


Sure wasn't, muffybee.  And I think the fact that they were black was supposed to appeal to Hitler's sister's daughter as well, given her known racist tendencies.  Deepak has been told Natalee called them slaves so guess that also gave him the idea to select a couple of black people to go along with the Plantation mentality of the Alabama Delegation.  Course he got that little tidbit from Joran telling him Natalee said that.  Joran's way of trying to make Deepak hate Natalee.  And also a good reflection of Joran's prejudices as well instead of all the others he tries to cast aspersions upon.



I believe they were arrested because of their race. Paulus hand picked black guards. They had no evidence on them, the H-T families were from Alabama, they thought they would eat it up. Wrong. As for the Hitler and slave references, same deal. All the those references originated with the van der Sloots and were picked up by the Kalpoes and Janssen. They were trying to discredit her from the beginning. Do you remember Joran saying she was out of her mind on drugs and alcohol initially, then changing his story completely because he found out he could be charged with rape? Same deal.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: MalteseMom on December 02, 2007, 07:10:57 PM
I just can't believe that Robin would think Julia Renfro was on the family's side.  How Sad


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Buckeye on December 02, 2007, 07:11:20 PM

I think the boys were being quite clever and described the apparel of The Soul Beach guards.  I think it backfired on them.  Didn't Mickey have on a black coat that night??

The only thing ... the security guards were not working on the evening/ morning when Natalee Holloway went missing.

Janet

+++++++++++++++++++++++

Chris LeJuez - Abraham Jones' Attorney
NANCY GRACE
June 9, 2005


LEJUEZ: My client`s alibi he is that went to a soul music festival at another beach far away from the Holiday Inn hotel. He was there with his wife, with his friend, and he saw many friends there. They were together when he went home, and they spent the night together at home. The next morning, he woke up and went to work at around 7:00 o`clock in the morning, a very believable and confirmed alibi.


Noraina Pietersz - Mickey John's Attorney
NANCY GRACE
June 9, 2005


PIETERSZ: Well, he has an alibi, but the problem is, he has nobody to verify it because his mother was at home. She was sleeping. And like she said, he`s a grown-up man. She doesn`t really control and check on the time he gets home. So he doesn`t have somebody that can say, Oh, yes, he was home at such time. That`s the only thing. But the fact is that he was not at the Holiday Inn. He was never seen at that time during the disappearance at the Holiday Inn. He was not working. He didn`t have a uniform, so it could never be him, the man that these two now suspects are talking about.

I think the boys were trying to implicate the Soul Beach guards (who by then would have left the island....with Natalee).  It was the ALE that went with the others.  I don't know why.  I know they weren't working.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Anna on December 02, 2007, 07:11:28 PM
Someone  emailed this  to me it's from Robin Holloway
I think she talking about Mark in aruba not Mark F
If you already have it you can delete it TY

Dave is currently on his way home to Meridian. Beth is on her way back also. They met with the KLPD and OM yesterday. I guess there is a miscommunication between interrogation and questioning. They had a lot of questions for Dave and Beth in efforts to help Natalee’s case and dispel a lot of nasty rumours. Also, Dave and Beth had a lot of questions for them too in regards to Natalee’s case. The meeting went well and they are working hard, but we don’t know what will happen next and pray this water search will turn up something. As far as Julia, we have stayed in contact with her and she truly does care for Natalee and wants to know what happened to her as much as anyone else. Dave was able to meet with Mark for a little while last night while he was there and had a nice visit. It is good to know they are still there and willing to help. Please know they are still there too for Natalee.

For now, waiting on Dave to get home and will watch the news or wait on that phone call to see what will happen next. It’s been a long two and a half years and never dreamed this much time would go by with no answers. Thanks to all of you for your continued support and for hanging in there with us. Thank you Debbie for coming to Meridian to hang out with the girls, Matt and me. I was a nervous wreck and glad you were able to make time for us this weekend. Brooke just got in from a playdate and was upset she didn’t get to say goodbye Sad I don’t think she realized you would be gone before she got home.

The boat should be in Aruba depending on the weather between Thurs and Saturday. Will keep you updated.



Sorry but I call BS on the red highlighted above.  I think it's a huge problem to trust Julia Renfro or Mark Purcell.  I doubt Beth does.


Look at the way those two have trashed not only Natalee but so many of us as well.  I guess our support is very cheap.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 02, 2007, 07:11:28 PM

They never released Paulus' telephone records but we know these exist and that he was wiretapped. Rudy Croes told us there were very suspicious phone calls between Paulus and Van der Straten in the early goings. Mayhaps this is some of the "overlooked" evidence Mos spoke of. Mos does not seem to feel the love for Paulus that the original bunch does.  Am sure he has these in the file.


Dayhiker ... I have only located one quote of Hans Mos that references ... the Father.  I must have missing something.

I cannot imagine any "new" wiretap and textmessage evidence that would not implicate Paulus along with Joran, Deepak and Satish.  I cannot imagine any "re-examination" of existing evidence which would not implicate Paulus along with Joran, Deepak and Satish.  Yet ... Paulus was not detained along with the other three.

I have read over many of Hanns Mos statements to the media as well as his words in the Greta interview.  In my opinion ... there is a deafening silence by Hans Mos in regards to Paulus ... there is an appearance that Paulus is off topic.

Janet



Correct Janet, that is the quote I was referencing.

And what we think is very important, at least the Dutch suspect, instead of the two Surinams, and his father, who was one way or another involved in this case, has said in interviews that they are willing to talk.


I wouldn't expect Mos to say much about Paulus until he is arrested again.

Could someone please explain what Hans Mos is talking about in that one quote where he references Paulus ... the Father.  I find his words so confusing.

Thanks.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on December 02, 2007, 07:13:05 PM
I know that anyone in Beth's family would agree to be interrogated for an eternity if it would help Mos do his job. IF THERE IS ANY INFORMATION THE FAMILY COULD POSSIBLY POSSESS THAT WOULD MOVE THIS CASE FORWARD I AM SURE THEY PRAY THAT MOS IS INTELLIGENT ENOUGH TO ASK THEM THE CORRECT QUESTION THAT WILL GENERATE THE NEEDED ANSWER. NOTHING WOULD BE OFF LIMITS.

However, I still think Mos is on track by prosecuting the brothers as that process is the most probable course to extracting the truth about what happened to Natalee. Three years to the brothers is a life time, and anything they can do to mitigate the time they have to serve they will do. Maybe Aruba doesn't have "plea bargaining" as we do, but I guarantee that cooperation with the authorities results in lighter sentences. I hope everyone will support Mos efforts, keep him politically strong and personally interested, and keep our expectations of him high so that Natalee's friends can only a part of the solution and not an excuse for the failure. People are people the world over and people are motivated by public support and the expectations people have of them, so lets give Mos all of that we have got. He has expressed his interest, demonstrated his passion, and is all we have as of now.

Well, at least I have 3 cents left after spewing my 2 cents worth.

PS My real reason for hope is that RU and those misfits still are not celebrating as one would think.


They don't use the word plea bargaining, Private Eye, but in their system the Dutch judge will go easier on them if they are forthcoming with the truth. Duh, sounds a lot like plea bargaining.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 02, 2007, 07:13:13 PM
I believe the 2 security guards were arrested and put in there to help the police to monitor what J2K were blabbing in jail.  JMO but I do believe they could not take a chance of having those boys talking to anyone so they placed the guards (probably paid off to do this) in cells next to them to account for anything they might say.
I disagee in the most polite and monkey like fashion.
IMO those two were arrested to see how it would fly and if Beth and Jug and Dave had not been there and done some of their own research into the facts and knew better, it would have been life for those two. Beth was the driving force on the CNN news channels in getting these two guys released. The families of the two guards were not treated in the same fashion as the Kalpoes or the Sloots. I do remember one of their mothers being on CNN and she was being told absolutely nothing by the ALE. I don't even think she was told where her son was. The guards families had no inside track in the Justice Ministry.

I have to agree with Kat.  Considering the way Aruba looks down on blacks (and women), the 2 black men would of been the 'easy out' for Aruba.

Race did not have a significant role in the arrest of Antonius Johns and Abraham Jones.  The fact that Johns is from Grenada and Jones from Bonaire probably did make them more vulnerable to becoming “dispensable” in the eyes of the police investigators, because they are immigrants.

Oh really. Hmmm.  I saw the photos of the two security guards being dragged out of their houses early in the a.m. in their boxers and handcuffs.  IIRC, that wasn't the case for Joran. 


Sure wasn't, muffybee.  And I think the fact that they were black was supposed to appeal to Hitler's sister's daughter as well, given her known racist tendencies.  Deepak has been told Natalee called them slaves so guess that also gave him the idea to select a couple of black people to go along with the Plantation mentality of the Alabama Delegation.  Course he got that little tidbit from Joran telling him Natalee said that.  Joran's way of trying to make Deepak hate Natalee.  And also a good reflection of Joran's prejudices as well instead of all the others he tries to cast aspersions upon.


I think the truth be known Anita and Paulus called Natalee racist and that was planted by the "Yenta," Rosemary Arnold.  Make no mistake there is a method to the outrage of the obstreperous Taco.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Buckeye on December 02, 2007, 07:13:57 PM
There are none so blind as those that will not see.

There was no confusion.  This is what Julia Renfro posted at RU.  Her intent was clear.

Glenda  PostPosted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 2:06 pm         

Beth spends 6 hours with OM
Word on the street, she was being questioned for six hours. Dave and JQK also there.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 02, 2007, 07:14:39 PM
I just can't believe that Robin would think Julia Renfro was on the family's side.  How Sad

I cannot read what Robin writes, because it makes me feel like I am in the twilight zone.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on December 02, 2007, 07:14:51 PM

Could someone please explain what Hans Mos is talking about in that one quote where he references Paulus ... the Father.  I find his words so confusing.

Thanks.

Janet


This seems pretty clear to me:

and his (Joran's) father, who was one way or another involved in this case


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 02, 2007, 07:16:23 PM
Someone  emailed this  to me it's from Robin Holloway
I think she talking about Mark in aruba not Mark F
If you already have it you can delete it TY

Dave is currently on his way home to Meridian. Beth is on her way back also. They met with the KLPD and OM yesterday. I guess there is a miscommunication between interrogation and questioning. They had a lot of questions for Dave and Beth in efforts to help Natalee’s case and dispel a lot of nasty rumours. Also, Dave and Beth had a lot of questions for them too in regards to Natalee’s case. The meeting went well and they are working hard, but we don’t know what will happen next and pray this water search will turn up something. As far as Julia, we have stayed in contact with her and she truly does care for Natalee and wants to know what happened to her as much as anyone else. Dave was able to meet with Mark for a little while last night while he was there and had a nice visit. It is good to know they are still there and willing to help. Please know they are still there too for Natalee.

For now, waiting on Dave to get home and will watch the news or wait on that phone call to see what will happen next. It’s been a long two and a half years and never dreamed this much time would go by with no answers. Thanks to all of you for your continued support and for hanging in there with us. Thank you Debbie for coming to Meridian to hang out with the girls, Matt and me. I was a nervous wreck and glad you were able to make time for us this weekend. Brooke just got in from a playdate and was upset she didn’t get to say goodbye Sad I don’t think she realized you would be gone before she got home.

The boat should be in Aruba depending on the weather between Thurs and Saturday. Will keep you updated.



Robin is not a smart lady....obviously easily taken in..she has proved this time after time....perhaps we should send her all the nasty statements and utterances she has made against and about Natalee...forget the nastiness that comes out of her much used mouth about Beth :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 02, 2007, 07:16:41 PM


Yes, but then we know Glenda is more knowledgeable of technology, pathology, forensics, global warming, art, hardware, contracting, stockmarket and especially murder and mayhem than all people put together, either alive or dead on the planet at this moment.

ok girlfriend...just how much "egg nog" you been drinking tonight?! lol

I hate to disagrre with Tyler...but IMO the only thing renHo has any knowledge of is what she can do on her back or her knees :shock:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: private eye on December 02, 2007, 07:17:03 PM
Julia Renho is no friend of Natalee or Beth's family, period, imo.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 02, 2007, 07:17:09 PM
Of course, should Natalee's remains be found, then the emissaries of hell will claim it was planted to be found.  I hope they have an impeccable witness aboard and video everything.




Oh Anna...they already think that. They think this ship is carrying Natalee out to sea to be planted...didn't you know?  :roll:

 :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 02, 2007, 07:18:06 PM


Yes, but then we know Glenda is more knowledgeable of technology, pathology, forensics, global warming, art, hardware, contracting, stockmarket and especially murder and mayhem than all people put together, either alive or dead on the planet at this moment.

ok girlfriend...just how much "egg nog" you been drinking tonight?! lol

I hate to disagrre with Tyler...but IMO the only thing renHo has any knowledge of is what she can do on her back or her knees :shock:

I forgot to add the "rolling eyes."


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2007, 07:18:12 PM
Julia Renho is no friend of Natalee or Beth's family, period, imo.

Agreed!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Anna on December 02, 2007, 07:18:57 PM
I just can't believe that Robin would think Julia Renfro was on the family's side.  How Sad

I cannot read what Robin writes, because it makes me feel like I am in the twilight zone.


Totally confusing.  Yes, I hear that music playing now.  Maybe we should all be over at RU bashing Natalee and calling Beth a liar?  I just do not understand at all.  Not at all.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: dennisintn on December 02, 2007, 07:19:24 PM
replay of greta today

the delicious sporter admitted they went to his house but didnt go in.. :roll:

sureeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee..


I believe Paulus has MUCH involvement.  I can't get that picture of him at the casino talking to Natalee out of my mind.  Maybe Paulus was the one who had so much interest in Natalee at first.  Joran is very protective about his father.  Maybe Paulus was more involved in the beginning and that is why he was willing to help 2K so much (meeting, planning, attorneys, etc.).  It think they did go to Joran's house BUT that they DID go inside. 



the major problem with jvds statements is that you can never believe any of them.  whether you want to believe what he says or not.  he even lies when the truth would do him better.
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2007, 07:19:25 PM
I just can't believe that Robin would think Julia Renfro was on the family's side.  How Sad

I cannot read what Robin writes, because it makes me feel like I am in the twilight zone.

 :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on December 02, 2007, 07:20:12 PM
Of course, should Natalee's remains be found, then the emissaries of hell will claim it was planted to be found.  I hope they have an impeccable witness aboard and video everything.




Oh Anna...they already think that. They think this ship is carrying Natalee out to sea to be planted...didn't you know?  :roll:


Of course, it's part of the big FBI plot they eluded to in Geezix' article. And the Dutch are in on it to, and Hitler's relatives, the slave owners, the insurance companies, and the little green men. :D :D :D


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: San on December 02, 2007, 07:21:13 PM
I just can't believe that Robin would think Julia Renfro was on the family's side.  How Sad

I cannot read what Robin writes, because it makes me feel like I am in the twilight zone.

 :lol: :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Anna on December 02, 2007, 07:21:17 PM
Of course, should Natalee's remains be found, then the emissaries of hell will claim it was planted to be found.  I hope they have an impeccable witness aboard and video everything.




Oh Anna...they already think that. They think this ship is carrying Natalee out to sea to be planted...didn't you know?  :roll:

 :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:


Actually, Nutz, no, I don't read there very often at all.  Makes me ill.  But it is predictible.

They need a credible witness and a good video camera.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 02, 2007, 07:21:44 PM
Of course, should Natalee's remains be found, then the emissaries of hell will claim it was planted to be found.  I hope they have an impeccable witness aboard and video everything.




Oh Anna...they already think that. They think this ship is carrying Natalee out to sea to be planted...didn't you know?  :roll:


Of course, it's part of the big FBI plot they eluded to in Geezix' article. And the Dutch are in on it to, and Hitler's relatives, the slave owners, the insurance companies, and the little green men. :D :D :D

Listen up, Monkeys.  Make sure you have your decoder rings and tin foil beanies ready before the ship arrives on Aruba.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 02, 2007, 07:22:18 PM


I think the truth be known Anita and Paulus called Natalee racist and that was planted by the "Yenta," Rosemary Arnold.  Make no mistake there is a method to the outrage of the obstreperous Taco.

LOL...thank goodness I knew what this meant and didn't have to pull up the dictionary.....  :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 02, 2007, 07:24:17 PM


Yes, but then we know Glenda is more knowledgeable of technology, pathology, forensics, global warming, art, hardware, contracting, stockmarket and especially murder and mayhem than all people put together, either alive or dead on the planet at this moment.

ok girlfriend...just how much "egg nog" you been drinking tonight?! lol

I hate to disagrre with Tyler...but IMO the only thing renHo has any knowledge of is what she can do on her back or her knees :shock:

no eggnog....coconut rum and coffee.... :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on December 02, 2007, 07:24:25 PM
Someone  emailed this  to me it's from Robin Holloway
I think she talking about Mark in aruba not Mark F
If you already have it you can delete it TY

Dave is currently on his way home to Meridian. Beth is on her way back also. They met with the KLPD and OM yesterday. I guess there is a miscommunication between interrogation and questioning. They had a lot of questions for Dave and Beth in efforts to help Natalee’s case and dispel a lot of nasty rumours. Also, Dave and Beth had a lot of questions for them too in regards to Natalee’s case. The meeting went well and they are working hard, but we don’t know what will happen next and pray this water search will turn up something. As far as Julia, we have stayed in contact with her and she truly does care for Natalee and wants to know what happened to her as much as anyone else. Dave was able to meet with Mark for a little while last night while he was there and had a nice visit. It is good to know they are still there and willing to help. Please know they are still there too for Natalee.

For now, waiting on Dave to get home and will watch the news or wait on that phone call to see what will happen next. It’s been a long two and a half years and never dreamed this much time would go by with no answers. Thanks to all of you for your continued support and for hanging in there with us. Thank you Debbie for coming to Meridian to hang out with the girls, Matt and me. I was a nervous wreck and glad you were able to make time for us this weekend. Brooke just got in from a playdate and was upset she didn’t get to say goodbye Sad I don’t think she realized you would be gone before she got home.

The boat should be in Aruba depending on the weather between Thurs and Saturday. Will keep you updated.



 :shock: :shock: :shock: :gaah:

Hasn't Robin any idea what these people have said and done to trash Beth and Natalee?
IMO Robin is a loose cannon that could cause damage to this mission by sharing too much on public boards or with people who have set themselves in a position to use any information for the wrong ends and then to discard the source.
Remember the old saying : Loose lips sink ships.

I am going to log out now before I post anything more that may get me banned   :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 02, 2007, 07:24:36 PM


I think the truth be known Anita and Paulus called Natalee racist and that was planted by the "Yenta," Rosemary Arnold.  Make no mistake there is a method to the outrage of the obstreperous Taco.

LOL...thank goodness I knew what this meant and didn't have to pull up the dictionary.....  :lol:

Well, if the shoe fits, I think he should wear this name! :lol: :lol: :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on December 02, 2007, 07:26:12 PM
There are none so blind as those that will not see.

There was no confusion.  This is what Julia Renfro posted at RU.  Her intent was clear.

Glenda  PostPosted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 2:06 pm         

Beth spends 6 hours with OM
Word on the street, she was being questioned for six hours. Dave and JQK also there.



And who is sitting in jail right now? Oh, I get it. They threw Joran in jail to bait Beth into coming to Aruba. She must have made a daring escape.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 02, 2007, 07:27:04 PM



Of course, it's part of the big FBI plot they eluded to in Geezix' article. And the Dutch are in on it to, and Hitler's relatives, the slave owners, the insurance companies, and the little green men. :D :D :D

Listen up, Monkeys.  Make sure you have your decoder rings and tin foil beanies ready before the ship arrives on Aruba.

well there went my coffee and coconut rum all over my computer screen!  LOL


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: tcumom on December 02, 2007, 07:27:28 PM
I just can't believe that Robin would think Julia Renfro was on the family's side.  How Sad

I cannot read what Robin writes, because it makes me feel like I am in the twilight zone.
delusional comes to mind as I read what Robin is perhaps parroting.  :shock:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Anna on December 02, 2007, 07:28:30 PM
There are none so blind as those that will not see.

There was no confusion.  This is what Julia Renfro posted at RU.  Her intent was clear.

Glenda  PostPosted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 2:06 pm         

Beth spends 6 hours with OM
Word on the street, she was being questioned for six hours. Dave and JQK also there.



And who is sitting in jail right now? Oh, I get it. They threw Joran in jail to bait Beth into coming to Aruba. She must have made a daring escape.

Only with the help of Jug the Gunrunner was she able to escape their clutches, Hiker.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 02, 2007, 07:28:51 PM


I think the truth be known Anita and Paulus called Natalee racist and that was planted by the "Yenta," Rosemary Arnold.  Make no mistake there is a method to the outrage of the obstreperous Taco.

LOL...thank goodness I knew what this meant and didn't have to pull up the dictionary.....  :lol:

Well, if the shoe fits, I think he should wear this name! :lol: :lol: :lol:

LOL...well he is a perfect visual definition for sure!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on December 02, 2007, 07:30:23 PM

Listen up, Monkeys.  Make sure you have your decoder rings and tin foil beanies ready before the ship arrives on Aruba.


LOL, Tyler. I am running some juice down to my fallout shelter as we speak. I think the Commies are in on it, too.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 02, 2007, 07:30:55 PM
Someone  emailed this  to me it's from Robin Holloway
I think she talking about Mark in aruba not Mark F
If you already have it you can delete it TY

Dave is currently on his way home to Meridian. Beth is on her way back also. They met with the KLPD and OM yesterday. I guess there is a miscommunication between interrogation and questioning. They had a lot of questions for Dave and Beth in efforts to help Natalee’s case and dispel a lot of nasty rumours. Also, Dave and Beth had a lot of questions for them too in regards to Natalee’s case. The meeting went well and they are working hard, but we don’t know what will happen next and pray this water search will turn up something. As far as Julia, we have stayed in contact with her and she truly does care for Natalee and wants to know what happened to her as much as anyone else. Dave was able to meet with Mark for a little while last night while he was there and had a nice visit. It is good to know they are still there and willing to help. Please know they are still there too for Natalee.

For now, waiting on Dave to get home and will watch the news or wait on that phone call to see what will happen next. It’s been a long two and a half years and never dreamed this much time would go by with no answers. Thanks to all of you for your continued support and for hanging in there with us. Thank you Debbie for coming to Meridian to hang out with the girls, Matt and me. I was a nervous wreck and glad you were able to make time for us this weekend. Brooke just got in from a playdate and was upset she didn’t get to say goodbye Sad I don’t think she realized you would be gone before she got home.

The boat should be in Aruba depending on the weather between Thurs and Saturday. Will keep you updated.



Robin is not a smart lady....obviously easily taken in..she has proved this time after time....perhaps we should send her all the nasty statements and utterances she has made against and about Natalee...forget the nastiness that comes out of her much used mouth about Beth :roll:

?? who is Mark? Are she talking about fat Bastard??!! :shock:
Does anyone know what she meant by miscommunications between interrogations and questioning?
Was Dave and Beth questioned??!! Is that your understanding too? About what???!!!!!! Whether Beth is related to Hitler?
OK...this is making me angry!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Anna on December 02, 2007, 07:31:04 PM
I am with Tibro.  I think I had better take a little break before I become obstreperous and post something that might get me banned.

BBL


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on December 02, 2007, 07:31:08 PM
There are none so blind as those that will not see.

There was no confusion.  This is what Julia Renfro posted at RU.  Her intent was clear.

Glenda  PostPosted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 2:06 pm         

Beth spends 6 hours with OM
Word on the street, she was being questioned for six hours. Dave and JQK also there.



And who is sitting in jail right now? Oh, I get it. They threw Joran in jail to bait Beth into coming to Aruba. She must have made a daring escape.

Only with the help of Jug the Gunrunner was she able to escape their clutches, Hiker.


 :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 02, 2007, 07:32:32 PM
There are none so blind as those that will not see.

There was no confusion.  This is what Julia Renfro posted at RU.  Her intent was clear.

Glenda  PostPosted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 2:06 pm         

Beth spends 6 hours with OM
Word on the street, she was being questioned for six hours. Dave and JQK also there.



And who is sitting in jail right now? Oh, I get it. They threw Joran in jail to bait Beth into coming to Aruba. She must have made a daring escape.

Only with the help of Jug the Gunrunner was she able to escape their clutches, Hiker.

on the illegal Med Jet he had waiting!!!  :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Anna on December 02, 2007, 07:33:07 PM
Yes, LD, she are talking about fat bastard.

Care to join me and Tibro in taking a break before getting banned?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Blonde on December 02, 2007, 07:33:41 PM
I just can't believe that Robin would think Julia Renfro was on the family's side.  How Sad

I cannot read what Robin writes, because it makes me feel like I am in the twilight zone.

That's why I can't go to BFN
 Mark has talked very bad about Natalee & Beth

Mark & Julia are best friends


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 02, 2007, 07:33:46 PM
I am with Tibro.  I think I had better take a little break before I become obstreperous and post something that might get me banned.

BBL

me too!!! Switching to good old football and laundry!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: MuffyBee on December 02, 2007, 07:34:06 PM
Yes, LD, she are talking about fat bastard.

Care to join me and Tibro in taking a break before getting banned?

That's just flippin' unbelievable....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 02, 2007, 07:34:50 PM
Yes, LD, she are talking about fat bastard.

Care to join me and Tibro in taking a break before getting banned?

I am joinin' ya girlfriends!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: MuffyBee on December 02, 2007, 07:35:53 PM
Yes, LD, she are talking about fat bastard.

Care to join me and Tibro in taking a break before getting banned?

That's just flippin' unbelievable....

Well, I believe it alright.  But geeeeeesh...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2007, 07:37:18 PM
Yes, LD, she are talking about fat bastard.

Care to join me and Tibro in taking a break before getting banned?

I doubt you could say anything about Renfro or Purcell that would make me ban you  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 02, 2007, 07:37:59 PM
I just can't believe that Robin would think Julia Renfro was on the family's side.  How Sad

I cannot read what Robin writes, because it makes me feel like I am in the twilight zone.


Keep your friends close and your enemies closer? :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: private eye on December 02, 2007, 07:39:12 PM
As I earlier posted, my impression of Beth is she would welcomed being questioned, interrogated, etc if it helps Mos with his case, so I wouldn't sweat the dumb posts of RU. Anything he needs to know I hope he has the sense to ask, because Beth's family wants him to have any information they have. Beth has nothing to fear from the truth. Hell, I imagine Beth and her whole family tree would should up for questioning if it would help. Some of her family wouild also love to even be held in the same jail that Joran is currently being held and would pay to be Joran's cell mate:) Big dollars:))))))))


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 02, 2007, 07:39:16 PM
You know for supposedly well-educated people, those including Tacopino, Rosemary Arnold, Paulus vanderSloot and Anita, they would know that Hitler who disappeared or died at a fairly advanced age, was already out of the news when Beth was born and moreover, the Civil War and plantations were gone 140 years before this event occurred.  It just makes them look and sound so third-world.  It almost makes me feel sorry for people like Julia Renfro who has no ability to work other than spread the message of these obviously ignorant people.  You know she must hate having to do it even though it pays well, but it is an embarrassment to see them all claiming to be so intelligent and yet espousing ignorant comments like these.  Perhaps they do it just to play to the Refugees, many of whom appear to hail from Gardendale and have gotten hairdresser jobs in Mountain Brook.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 02, 2007, 07:42:25 PM
I just can't believe that Robin would think Julia Renfro was on the family's side.  How Sad

I cannot read what Robin writes, because it makes me feel like I am in the twilight zone.


Keep your friends close and your enemies closer? :wink:

Could that be possible???


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Anna on December 02, 2007, 07:43:17 PM
I just can't believe that Robin would think Julia Renfro was on the family's side.  How Sad

I cannot read what Robin writes, because it makes me feel like I am in the twilight zone.

That's why I can't go to BFN
 Mark has talked very bad about Natalee & Beth

Mark & Julia are best friends

Exactly, what Mark knows, Julia knows.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 02, 2007, 07:44:48 PM
Someone  emailed this  to me it's from Robin Holloway
I think she talking about Mark in aruba not Mark F
If you already have it you can delete it TY

Dave is currently on his way home to Meridian. Beth is on her way back also. They met with the KLPD and OM yesterday. I guess there is a miscommunication between interrogation and questioning. They had a lot of questions for Dave and Beth in efforts to help Natalee’s case and dispel a lot of nasty rumours. Also, Dave and Beth had a lot of questions for them too in regards to Natalee’s case. The meeting went well and they are working hard, but we don’t know what will happen next and pray this water search will turn up something. As far as Julia, we have stayed in contact with her and she truly does care for Natalee and wants to know what happened to her as much as anyone else. Dave was able to meet with Mark for a little while last night while he was there and had a nice visit. It is good to know they are still there and willing to help. Please know they are still there too for Natalee.

For now, waiting on Dave to get home and will watch the news or wait on that phone call to see what will happen next. It’s been a long two and a half years and never dreamed this much time would go by with no answers. Thanks to all of you for your continued support and for hanging in there with us. Thank you Debbie for coming to Meridian to hang out with the girls, Matt and me. I was a nervous wreck and glad you were able to make time for us this weekend. Brooke just got in from a playdate and was upset she didn’t get to say goodbye Sad I don’t think she realized you would be gone before she got home.

The boat should be in Aruba depending on the weather between Thurs and Saturday. Will keep you updated.



Robin ... if you are reading ... I am just trying to comprehend your unwavering loyalty to Julia Renfro and Mark Purcell ... especially  when you stop and consider their dispictable, disrespectful words that continually undermine Beth Holloway's every word and action ... the mother of your precious stepdaughter.  Robin ... in my opinion ... your ongoing words supporting Julia and Mark ... are outright betrayals to both Beth and Natalee.

Janet

++++++++++++++++++++   

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2403.msg309813;topicseen#msg309813

Angiex911dsptchr
Scared Monkey
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #697 11/29/2007

« Reply #975 on: November 30, 2007, 07:08:30 PM »

Renho is a XXXXXXX.  I saw a post of hers on RU earlier todday, about the Earthquake that hit the carribean..she said Maybe it was Beth landing.


http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2003741183_aruba09.html

As missing-teen case cools, Aruba turns against family
By Carol J. Williams
Los Angeles Times
June 9, 2007


American Julia Renfro, editor-in-chief of Aruba Today, initially sided with Holloway's parents when they sought publicity and lambasted Aruban police for following Dutch investigative procedures different from those in the United States.

Galvanized by compassion for a desperate mother, Renfro stopped the presses of her daily newspaper for the first time in its history to include a picture of Holloway to aid Arubans in the islandwide search.

Renfro, a mother of four, spent weeks shuttling the family from the scene of one rumored development to another, but she became disenchanted with what she saw as Twitty's pandering to tabloid TV and "flat-out lies" she told on the air.

"I feel guilty saying any negative thing about a mother who has lost her daughter," Renfro said. "But her behavior was odd from the get-go."

Renfro has concluded that the body would have turned up by now if she died on the island proper. She -- and many Arubans -- doubts the three suspects, all good students without criminal records, could have pulled off a perfect crime, never caving in to intense interrogations.

"I've spoken with all of the suspects," she said. "I don't believe any of them did anything to her."

Heavily intoxicated, according to accounts given by her classmates to the FBI, Holloway could have staggered into the sea and drowned after the local men left her, Renfro speculated.

Holloway might have died of alcohol poisoning or a drug overdose and washed out to sea, as Deputy Police Chief Gerold Dompig surmised. She might have climbed aboard one of dozens of catamarans and cabin cruisers for late-night partying after a nearby concert.

Renfro says she was perplexed when Twitty immediately concluded that her daughter had been kidnapped and made no effort to check hospitals or police about accident victims. Within hours, Twitty had concluded van der Sloot was responsible, and within a couple of days she was telling TV interviewers that she knew her daughter had been gang-raped and murdered.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 02, 2007, 07:46:04 PM
Yes, LD, she are talking about fat bastard.

Care to join me and Tibro in taking a break before getting banned?

LOL...I sincerely don't believe you, or anyone, could say anything about renHO that would get you banned...... :lol:   


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: dennisintn on December 02, 2007, 07:47:01 PM
Yes, LD, she are talking about fat bastard.

Care to join me and Tibro in taking a break before getting banned?

I doubt you could say anything about Renfro or Purcell that would make me ban you  :wink:

i could truthfully say things about renfroe and purcell that would get me banned from the entire damned internet.  
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 02, 2007, 07:47:05 PM
JANET, STANDING OVATION!!!! :smt052 :smt052 :smt052


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 02, 2007, 07:47:06 PM
Yes, LD, she are talking about fat bastard.

Care to join me and Tibro in taking a break before getting banned?

I doubt you could say anything about Renfro or Purcell that would make me ban you  :wink:

see I was right!!! :lol: :lol: :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2007, 07:47:44 PM
I just can't believe that Robin would think Julia Renfro was on the family's side.  How Sad

I cannot read what Robin writes, because it makes me feel like I am in the twilight zone.


Keep your friends close and your enemies closer? :wink:

Could that be possible???

I don't think that's the case with Robin and Dave.  I can only guess that Robin and Dave MUST be very naive.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 02, 2007, 07:47:50 PM
I just can't believe that Robin would think Julia Renfro was on the family's side.  How Sad

I cannot read what Robin writes, because it makes me feel like I am in the twilight zone.


Keep your friends close and your enemies closer? :wink:

Nut...robin is not that smart....sad, but true.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: MalteseMom on December 02, 2007, 07:48:50 PM
Standing up and appauding for Janet.  Well said!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: dennisintn on December 02, 2007, 07:49:34 PM
I just can't believe that Robin would think Julia Renfro was on the family's side.  How Sad

I cannot read what Robin writes, because it makes me feel like I am in the twilight zone.

lol, it couldn't be truer, but it's almost impossible to do.  causes ulcers and migraines.
dennisintn


Keep your friends close and your enemies closer? :wink:

Could that be possible???


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 02, 2007, 07:51:51 PM
Janet...this is one of the best posts I have evr seem...by anyone...thank you!


Robin ... if you are reading ... I am just trying to comprehend your unwavering loyalty to Julia Renfro and Mark Purcell ... especially  when you stop and consider their dispictable, disrespectful words that continually undermine Beth Holloway's every word and action ... the mother of your precious stepdaughter.  Robin ... in my opinion ... your ongoing words supporting Julia and Mark ... are outright betrayals to both Beth and Natalee.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 02, 2007, 07:52:49 PM
Robin's loyalty to Mark and Julia has gotten her and Dave exactly nowhere.  There is not one thing that she can say this has gotten her.  The MB kids and her townspeople supported them and then when they got on with their lives, as most people have to do and their kids went on off to college, Beth convinced Dave to go with JQK, which was the best thing they could have done. 

It is totally mindboggling how she goes on about them and her undying loyalty to GaGal who was hell-bent on negotiating any modicum of dignity she may have ever had with the dark side.  This is not a Christian behavior.  The Lord wants us to witness; He does not want us to compromise our own beliefs.  He says we are judged by the fruit we bear .... does that not mean those with whom one associates?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 02, 2007, 07:52:50 PM
Yes, LD, she are talking about fat bastard.

Care to join me and Tibro in taking a break before getting banned?

I doubt you could say anything about Renfro or Purcell that would make me ban you  :wink:

i could truthfully say things about renfroe and purcell that would get me banned from the entire damned internet. 
dennisintn

hahahaha...it's probably what many of us have thought...just not said out loud!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2007, 07:54:29 PM
JANET  

:thumright: :smt041 :smt038 :thumright: :bigup: :smt023


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 02, 2007, 07:56:17 PM
Robin ... prior to the summer of 2006 ... you did not adhere to the Aruban agenda of Julia Renfro and Mark Purcell.  What changed??

I sincerely want to understand ... your relationship with these two as well as others with an Aruban agenda ... just does not make sense.

Janet

+++++++++++++++

Robin Holloway
FOX NEWS
August 26, 2005


The brothers were first arrested on June 9 along with Joran van der Sloot (search), 18, who authorities have identified as a suspect in the case though no charges have been filed.

"We haven't been told why, but I think it's obvious," Natalee's stepmother, Robin Holloway, said by phone from Meridian, Miss.  We've known all along they all had something to do with Natalee's disappearance."


Robin Holloway
CBS NEWS
June 17, 2005


"I don't think they're going to find Natalee until these [first] three guys talk," said Robin Holloway.  They know they were the last ones to see her. And I firmly believe in my heart they know where Natalee is and just please tell us.  They hold the answer."


Robin Holloway
MSNBC - MORNING JOE
March 24, 2006


ROBIN HOLLOWAY, NATALEE HOLLOWAY’S STEPMOTHER: I’m confused. When Dave got on the island, from day one, Dennis Jacobs said, “Oh, she ran off with somebody to go find a beer. She’ll show up.”  And then a couple of months later, Dompig said, “They’re all three guilty as hell. We’re going to prove it. We’re going to close this case.”

And now, blaming the victim, yes.  It sounds like they’re trying to say, “Well, she had too much booze, too much drug use, and, as a result, she caused her own death.”


Robin Holloway
'Scarborough Country'
March 24, 2006


HOLLOWAY:  ... If she was drugged, it was because of the last drink Joran gave her, either compliments of Joran or the bartender.
 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Red on December 02, 2007, 07:59:21 PM
FYI:

The info that was taken down on the http://nholloway.blogspot.com/ blog was done by them as just a way of being cautious about information.

From what I have heard it will be back and they will continue to put more info out there.

Its simply a logistic matter. Nothing bad happened.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: islanders on December 02, 2007, 08:06:43 PM
What's up with attacking the Holloway family?

This isn't about them or their credibility.

You guys are nuts. I'm out of here.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Anna on December 02, 2007, 08:09:09 PM
FYI:

The info that was taken down on the http://nholloway.blogspot.com/ blog was done by them as just a way of being cautious about information.

From what I have heard it will be back and they will continue to put more info out there.

Its simply a logistic matter. Nothing bad happened.

Thanks, Red.

Good to know.  Yes, caution is certainly in order.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 02, 2007, 08:12:07 PM
I just can't believe that Robin would think Julia Renfro was on the family's side.  How Sad

I cannot read what Robin writes, because it makes me feel like I am in the twilight zone.

 :lol: :lol: :smt120


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 02, 2007, 08:13:50 PM
Of course, should Natalee's remains be found, then the emissaries of hell will claim it was planted to be found.  I hope they have an impeccable witness aboard and video everything.




Oh Anna...they already think that. They think this ship is carrying Natalee out to sea to be planted...didn't you know?  :roll:


Of course, it's part of the big FBI plot they eluded to in Geezix' article. And the Dutch are in on it to, and Hitler's relatives, the slave owners, the insurance companies, and the little green men. :D :D :D

Listen up, Monkeys.  Make sure you have your decoder rings and tin foil beanies ready before the ship arrives on Aruba.

 :lol: :lol: You guys are on a roll...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 02, 2007, 08:16:08 PM
What's up with attacking the Holloway family?

This isn't about them or their credibility.

You guys are nuts. I'm out of here.


Well, if this is not about the Holloway family and their missing loved one, please explain to me what it is about.  I am having another twilight zone moment.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: robots on December 02, 2007, 08:17:02 PM
i dont know what to say about what robin said


i find it incredulous

my head is spinning in circles

something aint right there


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2007, 08:17:37 PM
What's up with attacking the Holloway family?

This isn't about them or their credibility.

You guys are nuts. I'm out of here.


We are not attacking the Holloways, we are QUESTIONING why on earth Robin and Dave believe that Julia Renfro and Mark Purcell are worthy of trust after how badly they have spoken about both Natalee and Beth.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Anna on December 02, 2007, 08:18:22 PM
What's up with attacking the Holloway family?

This isn't about them or their credibility.

You guys are nuts. I'm out of here.



If we weren't before, we probably are now.  That's what this kind of thing does to me.  After the hate that has come from those people and the lies they have told about Natalee and Beth, I couldn't believe a word they say.  Add to that the fact they have trashed every one who has ever supported the family and it's enough to make one nuts for sure.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 02, 2007, 08:19:32 PM
FYI:

The info that was taken down on the http://nholloway.blogspot.com/ blog was done by them as just a way of being cautious about information.

From what I have heard it will be back and they will continue to put more info out there.

Its simply a logistic matter. Nothing bad happened.

thanks Red!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: robots on December 02, 2007, 08:20:11 PM
nobody from the family should trust anyone from aruba
in my opinion

maybe thats part of the problem



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Anna on December 02, 2007, 08:22:09 PM
I thought with the lead prosecutor saying JORAN and voluntary manslaughter we could at least stop looking in MB for a while.

Guess not.  Some know better than Mos, it seems.

But why do I just doubt the hell out of that???

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2007, 08:23:44 PM
REMINDER

Posted by Dana Pretzer:

Just to let everyone know I will be on the Crime And Punishment Radio show accross Canada tonight at 9:30pm et approx discussing the Holloway case.
For those of you not in Canada you can pick up the net feed of the show at http://www.cjob.com/ or leave comments at www.mikeoncrime.com
I believe there is a toll fee number you can call in during the show.
Now a favor can someone email me a timeline of events, it doenst have to be pages, i just want to make sure my dates are accurate.

Im not sure how long I will be on but I will try and cover as much as I can.

Dana


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Anna on December 02, 2007, 08:24:18 PM
nobody from the family should trust anyone from aruba
in my opinion

maybe thats part of the problem




And Julia wants Natalee found almost as much as the family?  Sure she does.  In MB!  Anywhere in Aruba is unacceptable.

This is giving me a headache.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 02, 2007, 08:26:56 PM
This reminds me of a song.....

Another one's gone and another one's gone...another one bites the dust...humming right along...and another one's gone.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Anna on December 02, 2007, 08:29:13 PM
Klaas,
That website says MINUS 16 C!!!  Degrees, temperature.   :shock:

Talk about being nuts!  I'd be home shivering.   :-|


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 02, 2007, 08:35:11 PM
http://tinyurl.com/yp5sag
For anyone who wants to read a bit about conditions of underwater remains then go to the above link. I will not post what it says in here out of respect to the family. Definition of  adipocere can be found here>>
http://encyclopedia.farlex.com/adipocere


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: private eye on December 02, 2007, 08:36:59 PM
I think it is very possible to like Robin and hate Julia. Robin is simply a nice trusting person and it is obvious to most of us that Julia isn't. So attacking Julia isn't attacking Robin and I don't think anyone is expressing their dislike for Robin or attacking Robin.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2007, 08:38:56 PM
I think it is very possible to like Robin and hate Julia. Robin is simply a nice trusting person and it is obvious to most of us that Julia isn't. So attacking Julia isn't attacking Robin and I don't think anyone is expressing their dislike for Robin or attacking Robin.

I agree.  I do wish that Robin and Dave would be less trusting of people like Julia Renfro. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: MuffyBee on December 02, 2007, 08:40:23 PM
I think it is very possible to like Robin and hate Julia. Robin is simply a nice trusting person and it is obvious to most of us that Julia isn't. So attacking Julia isn't attacking Robin and I don't think anyone is expressing their dislike for Robin or attacking Robin.

I agree.  I do wish that Robin and Dave would be less trusting of people like Julia Renfro. 

 :smt045 :smt045 :smt045


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 02, 2007, 08:43:21 PM
FYI:

The info that was taken down on the http://nholloway.blogspot.com/ blog was done by them as just a way of being cautious about information.

From what I have heard it will be back and they will continue to put more info out there.

Its simply a logistic matter. Nothing bad happened.

Thanks, Red.

Good to know.  Yes, caution is certainly in order.

Yessss..logistics! I knew it...thanks Red, this is good news.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Anna on December 02, 2007, 08:44:23 PM
If someone talked about my daughter like those people have Natalee, I'd punch their lights out, oh yes, I would.  Try at least. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: private eye on December 02, 2007, 08:44:36 PM
But that is what makes Robin and Dave who they are, nice people. Dave is an adjuster, former superintendent of adjusters for the state of Miss, so I imagine his private assessment of Julia is different than his public expression. Dave is pretty sharp despite his good ole boy persona. I hope I said that correctly:)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Anna on December 02, 2007, 08:45:45 PM
Edit like to as.

Better go iron and listen to Dana's soothing voice and hope it helps.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 02, 2007, 08:46:00 PM
What's up with attacking the Holloway family?

This isn't about them or their credibility.

You guys are nuts. I'm out of here.


 :2doh:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Shell on December 02, 2007, 08:48:12 PM
I am with Tibro.  I think I had better take a little break before I become obstreperous and post something that might get me banned.

BBL

Don't stay away too long, you contribute a lot here.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: igsigs on December 02, 2007, 08:51:20 PM
Yeah - i wouldn't take the bait on this topic either. It does not matter anymore. IMO

Unrelated - Joran is in jail and Mos says he has the goods. An interesting week ahead!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on December 02, 2007, 08:51:36 PM

Just hit the wires:

Consumer group warns of counterfeit Tickle Me Tito toys


The latest Tickle Me Tito version is slated to be one of this season's most popular holiday toy requests and one of the most difficult to find.

The toy, which is known for its distinctive laugh when it is tickled, has been counterfeited. And the fake Tito has appeared in two major Baltimore shopping malls at kiosks.

Read more on this story at Yahoot.com.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 02, 2007, 08:51:42 PM
There is an excellent read about Dr. Baden here>>>
http://www.crimelibrary.com/criminal_mind/forensics/autopsy/1.html
when you all have time. It is many pages long.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2007, 08:52:27 PM
But that is what makes Robin and Dave who they are, nice people. Dave is an adjuster, former superintendent of adjusters for the state of Miss, so I imagine his private assessment of Julia is different than his public expression. Dave is pretty sharp despite his good ole boy persona. I hope I said that correctly:)

I agree that Dave and Robin are very nice people.  It's Robin though that posts on the private forums where the same people have said horrible nasty things about Beth and Natalee.  That is what I can't understand. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2007, 08:55:08 PM

Just hit the wires:

Consumer group warns of counterfeit Tickle Me Tito toys


The latest Tickle Me Tito version is slated to be one of this season's most popular holiday toy requests and one of the most difficult to find.

The toy, which is known for its distinctive laugh when it is tickled, has been counterfeited. And the fake Tito has appeared in two major Baltimore shopping malls at kiosks.

Read more on this story at Yahoot.com.


 :lol: :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on December 02, 2007, 08:56:50 PM
Yeah - i wouldn't take the bait on this topic either. It does not matter anymore. IMO

Unrelated - Joran is in jail and Mos says he has the goods. An interesting week ahead!


Does rather make Renfro's, Geilen's, Munzenhofer's et all spaced out stories moot, doesn't it Igsigs?

Let's all go stand outside KIA and sing "I'll be home  for Christmas."


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2007, 08:58:21 PM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/ticklemetito.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2007, 08:59:03 PM
Time for Dexter - be back in a bit


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 02, 2007, 08:59:08 PM
Hey Shango!  Ridddle me this...

Did the music man provide escort to Calypso's domain?
Or were siblings of a friend the transporters of the dead?

Does the singing card remain hidden,
Has the card that was played lost its power?

Flying birds may sing, but many still don't understand the song.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: MuffyBee on December 02, 2007, 08:59:27 PM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/ticklemetito.jpg)

 :smt044 :smt044 :smt044


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 02, 2007, 08:59:55 PM
I think it is very possible to like Robin and hate Julia. Robin is simply a nice trusting person and it is obvious to most of us that Julia isn't. So attacking Julia isn't attacking Robin and I don't think anyone is expressing their dislike for Robin or attacking Robin.


That is absolutely correct. I only fear that she puts her trust in the wrong people and will be hurt even more. I have to say I admire and am in awe of Beth, her family and Dave, Robin and their family for being so strong and able to cope. I do not believe I would have handled all of this madness so well. May they all come to a sense of peace very soon.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on December 02, 2007, 09:00:47 PM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/ticklemetito.jpg)


 :smt082 :smt081 :smt082 :smt081 :smt082 :smt081 :smt082 :smt081


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 02, 2007, 09:07:30 PM

Just hit the wires:

Consumer group warns of counterfeit Tickle Me Tito toys


The latest Tickle Me Tito version is slated to be one of this season's most popular holiday toy requests and one of the most difficult to find.

The toy, which is known for its distinctive laugh when it is tickled, has been counterfeited. And the fake Tito has appeared in two major Baltimore shopping malls at kiosks.

Read more on this story at Yahoot.com.


 :lol: :lol:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4nRNYG_xM2U
I am way ot, but I just got this and you did the elmo thing
I am listening to Crime and Punishment, but no Dana yet, but I was out shovelling, sno, that is


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 02, 2007, 09:08:55 PM

Just hit the wires:

Consumer group warns of counterfeit Tickle Me Tito toys


The latest Tickle Me Tito version is slated to be one of this season's most popular holiday toy requests and one of the most difficult to find.

The toy, which is known for its distinctive laugh when it is tickled, has been counterfeited. And the fake Tito has appeared in two major Baltimore shopping malls at kiosks.

Read more on this story at Yahoot.com.
:lol: :lol: :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on December 02, 2007, 09:14:04 PM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4nRNYG_xM2U
I am way ot, but I just got this and you did the elmo thing
I am listening to Crime and Punishment, but no Dana yet, but I was out shovelling, sno, that is

LOL, that is a hoot, Kat!  :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: dennisintn on December 02, 2007, 09:15:39 PM
I am way ot, but I just got this and you did the elmo thing
I am listening to Crime and Punishment, but no Dana yet, but I was out shovelling, sno, that is
[/quote]


when i turned it on, all i got was a commercial and then silence.  hope there's nothing else to do until the show starts.
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Dana on December 02, 2007, 09:17:58 PM
I am way ot, but I just got this and you did the elmo thing
I am listening to Crime and Punishment, but no Dana yet, but I was out shovelling, sno, that is


when i turned it on, all i got was a commercial and then silence.  hope there's nothing else to do until the show starts.
dennisintn
[/quote]

if the other link deosnt work try www.newstalk980.com then clik listen live
Im on at 9:30pm et in about 15 minutes


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 02, 2007, 09:18:39 PM
If someone talked about my daughter like those people have Natalee, I'd punch their lights out, oh yes, I would.  Try at least. 
I would too. I know that for sure. At the very least, I would not want those ppl or their kind in my life. I haven't punched anyone's lites out ever, but there are ways to deal with slander and libel.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: robots on December 02, 2007, 09:22:33 PM
If someone talked about my daughter like those people have Natalee, I'd punch their lights out, oh yes, I would.  Try at least. 

i marched into the chief of police's office once SAT in his chair and said
"something better be done about the situation at hand"


he knew i was "upset"  and he took care of the problem in about 3 hours
he was a good guy and was NOT informed of the situation but by the time i left his  office
he was informed - a good cop

i see him everynow and then and he always waves probably muttering to himself
there is a crazy robots walking around here.......

 :cool:

i got the job done and so did he

 :cool:




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 02, 2007, 09:26:45 PM
I know, Kat & Dana, this is OT, but if you would over in the musings thread, or somewhere, I want the recipe for butter tarts, not the mooshy kind, not the rock kind, but the kind that breaks apart like Heaven in your mouth.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Anna on December 02, 2007, 09:29:42 PM
I have the player and program going but can't increase the volume.  Need it louder to hear while doing chores.  Any suggestions?

O/T It's raining Again, finally!

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: private eye on December 02, 2007, 09:31:43 PM
Nothing Robin does or say is going to affect the outcome of the case, and it is impossible to understand the chemistry of the brain that attracts 2 people as friends or causes a trust to exist, and it is possible that Robin doesn't know what to say or do in regards to Julia. I'll never understand the relationship, but it doesn't concern or involve me so I ignore it. Who knows, maybe it is me that is wrong. What I do know is that I am sure Robin was not prepared for this so if she has made a mistake it is unintentional. I know that she wants the case solved.

And I agree with another poster, we have good news in Mos prosecuting the brothers, and the potential for other answers to result from that prosecution, so we should celebrate. And I feel that Dave should be allowed to celebrate as well so we probably should overlook our disagreement concerning Julia and concentrate on hoping, helping, and expecting Mos to bring Beth and Dave the answers that they seek and deserve.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Red on December 02, 2007, 09:35:38 PM
But that is what makes Robin and Dave who they are, nice people. Dave is an adjuster, former superintendent of adjusters for the state of Miss, so I imagine his private assessment of Julia is different than his public expression. Dave is pretty sharp despite his good ole boy persona. I hope I said that correctly:)

I agree that Dave and Robin are very nice people.  It's Robin though that posts on the private forums where the same people have said horrible nasty things about Beth and Natalee.  That is what I can't understand. 

This is one of those cases where you are either with us or against us. There is no middle ground of posting on a hate site and then saying you support the family. So those that Robin finds trustworthy are either lying to her or lying to the Refugees. You cant have it both ways.

There is only one person in this matter whose voice that truly counts. However, I will say one thing ... If any of you have ever heard Beth speak at a function, she refers to herself as the following ... Natalee's mom.

Let's all keep that in mind and give that its proper due.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 02, 2007, 09:40:12 PM
And here's Dana /////
That emo thing, we know a girl like that. She has hair like that. LOL
It was very enjoyable to me,
... Dave is a Christian man. And he practises it. He proly thinks that these ppl :
a.) might have some lille bit of info that they let slip
b.) thinks that they might have a change of heart, like an epithany
c.) wants to be an example
He is a better man than I.  


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: AZSunny on December 02, 2007, 09:40:44 PM
Someone  emailed this  to me it's from Robin Holloway
I think she talking about Mark in aruba not Mark F
If you already have it you can delete it TY

Dave is currently on his way home to Meridian. Beth is on her way back also. They met with the KLPD and OM yesterday. I guess there is a miscommunication between interrogation and questioning. They had a lot of questions for Dave and Beth in efforts to help Natalee’s case and dispel a lot of nasty rumours. Also, Dave and Beth had a lot of questions for them too in regards to Natalee’s case. The meeting went well and they are working hard, but we don’t know what will happen next and pray this water search will turn up something. As far as Julia, we have stayed in contact with her and she truly does care for Natalee and wants to know what happened to her as much as anyone else. Dave was able to meet with Mark for a little while last night while he was there and had a nice visit. It is good to know they are still there and willing to help. Please know they are still there too for Natalee.

For now, waiting on Dave to get home and will watch the news or wait on that phone call to see what will happen next. It’s been a long two and a half years and never dreamed this much time would go by with no answers. Thanks to all of you for your continued support and for hanging in there with us. Thank you Debbie for coming to Meridian to hang out with the girls, Matt and me. I was a nervous wreck and glad you were able to make time for us this weekend. Brooke just got in from a playdate and was upset she didn’t get to say goodbye Sad I don’t think she realized you would be gone before she got home.

The boat should be in Aruba depending on the weather between Thurs and Saturday. Will keep you updated.



 :shock: :shock: :shock: :gaah:

Hasn't Robin any idea what these people have said and done to trash Beth and Natalee?
IMO Robin is a loose cannon that could cause damage to this mission by sharing too much on public boards or with people who have set themselves in a position to use any information for the wrong ends and then to discard the source.
Remember the old saying : Loose lips sink ships.

I am going to log out now before I post anything more that may get me banned   :roll:


I have heard that Robin is a very religious and understanding person, and that she forgives peoples faults.  I do not know Robin, and I have never met her.  I have however read comments she has made regarding occurences, and who she has placed her trust in. 

My opinion is, and ban me if you will, I think she is a very jealous person, and anyone who choses to not befriend, or turns against Beth is her best friend. I also think that she feels that all this attention focused for so long on searching for Natalee, has taken attention away from her and her children and her quality of life.  She resents that.  I am also concerned that she has convinced Dave of Julia's sincerity.  Robin is either very guible, or just plain stupid and naive.  I agree, she could be putting information into the wrong hands, or encouraging Dave to do that.  That scares me.  How could either of them consider Mark a friend?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Scandi on December 02, 2007, 09:44:11 PM
There is an excellent read about Dr. Baden here>>>
http://www.crimelibrary.com/criminal_mind/forensics/autopsy/1.html
when you all have time. It is many pages long.



Thanks Nut for all the good info you are bringing to the forum.  I for one am very interested in the new search and want to learn everythig I can.  When we find out exactly where they are putting the sonar in the water I hope we can find it on a map and get a topographic map of the bottom of the ocean there, typical currents, etc.  ;}


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: San on December 02, 2007, 09:44:31 PM
Nothing Robin does or say is going to affect the outcome of the case, and it is impossible to understand the chemistry of the brain that attracts 2 people as friends or causes a trust to exist, and it is possible that Robin doesn't know what to say or do in regards to Julia. I'll never understand the relationship, but it doesn't concern or involve me so I ignore it. Who knows, maybe it is me that is wrong. What I do know is that I am sure Robin was not prepared for this so if she has made a mistake it is unintentional. I know that she wants the case solved.

And I agree with another poster, we have good news in Mos prosecuting the brothers, and the potential for other answers to result from that prosecution, so we should celebrate. And I feel that Dave should be allowed to celebrate as well so we probably should overlook our disagreement concerning Julia and concentrate on hoping, helping, and expecting Mos to bring Beth and Dave the answers that they seek and deserve.

I will always hope that there will be justice for Natalee.  That is why I am here for 2 1/2 years.

As far as Julia Renfro goes no way in hell will I overlook the damage she has done.  What comes around goes around and she will get hers one day.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Dana on December 02, 2007, 09:48:35 PM
And here's Dana /////
That emo thing, we know a girl like that. She has hair like that. LOL
It was very enjoyable to me,
... Dave is a Christian man. And he practises it. He proly thinks that these ppl :
a.) might have some lille bit of info that they let slip
b.) thinks that they might have a change of heart, like an epithany
c.) wants to be an example
He is a better man than I.  

Not sure if mike will take calls till the end of the show, but feel free to call him and let him know your thoughts



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 02, 2007, 09:52:20 PM
Thank you, Az Sunny.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: San on December 02, 2007, 09:55:06 PM
Someone  emailed this  to me it's from Robin Holloway
I think she talking about Mark in aruba not Mark F
If you already have it you can delete it TY

Dave is currently on his way home to Meridian. Beth is on her way back also. They met with the KLPD and OM yesterday. I guess there is a miscommunication between interrogation and questioning. They had a lot of questions for Dave and Beth in efforts to help Natalee’s case and dispel a lot of nasty rumours. Also, Dave and Beth had a lot of questions for them too in regards to Natalee’s case. The meeting went well and they are working hard, but we don’t know what will happen next and pray this water search will turn up something. As far as Julia, we have stayed in contact with her and she truly does care for Natalee and wants to know what happened to her as much as anyone else. Dave was able to meet with Mark for a little while last night while he was there and had a nice visit. It is good to know they are still there and willing to help. Please know they are still there too for Natalee.

For now, waiting on Dave to get home and will watch the news or wait on that phone call to see what will happen next. It’s been a long two and a half years and never dreamed this much time would go by with no answers. Thanks to all of you for your continued support and for hanging in there with us. Thank you Debbie for coming to Meridian to hang out with the girls, Matt and me. I was a nervous wreck and glad you were able to make time for us this weekend. Brooke just got in from a playdate and was upset she didn’t get to say goodbye Sad I don’t think she realized you would be gone before she got home.

The boat should be in Aruba depending on the weather between Thurs and Saturday. Will keep you updated.



 :shock: :shock: :shock: :gaah:

Hasn't Robin any idea what these people have said and done to trash Beth and Natalee?
IMO Robin is a loose cannon that could cause damage to this mission by sharing too much on public boards or with people who have set themselves in a position to use any information for the wrong ends and then to discard the source.
Remember the old saying : Loose lips sink ships.

I am going to log out now before I post anything more that may get me banned   :roll:


I have heard that Robin is a very religious and understanding person, and that she forgives peoples faults.  I do not know Robin, and I have never met her.  I have however read comments she has made regarding occurences, and who she has placed her trust in. 

My opinion is, and ban me if you will, I think she is a very jealous person, and anyone who choses to not befriend, or turns against Beth is her best friend. I also think that she feels that all this attention focused for so long on searching for Natalee, has taken attention away from her and her children and her quality of life.  She resents that.  I am also concerned that she has convinced Dave of Julia's sincerity.  Robin is either very guible, or just plain stupid and naive.  I agree, she could be putting information into the wrong hands, or encouraging Dave to do that.  That scares me.  How could either of them consider Mark a friend?

Well said AZSunny.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 02, 2007, 09:55:30 PM
But that is what makes Robin and Dave who they are, nice people. Dave is an adjuster, former superintendent of adjusters for the state of Miss, so I imagine his private assessment of Julia is different than his public expression. Dave is pretty sharp despite his good ole boy persona. I hope I said that correctly:)

I agree that Dave and Robin are very nice people.  It's Robin though that posts on the private forums where the same people have said horrible nasty things about Beth and Natalee.  That is what I can't understand. 

This is one of those cases where you are either with us or against us. There is no middle ground of posting on a hate site and then saying you support the family. So those that Robin finds trustworthy are either lying to her or lying to the Refugees. You cant have it both ways.

There is only one person in this matter whose voice that truly counts. However, I will say one thing ... If any of you have ever heard Beth speak at a function, she refers to herself as the following ... Natalee's mom.

Let's all keep that in mind and give that its proper due.


See that is where the problems lies I believe Red. You and I and most of the Monkeys agree there is no middle ground in this case, but not all people feel or think the same way that we do. I don't understand it, not for one minute do I understand it at all...but it's not for me to understand really. Private eye is correct, Robin making friends with those we despise is not going to help or hurt the case for Natalee. I have to choose to let it go or it will just eat me up inside. I only have to look myself in the mirror everyday and that is a tough job just keeping myself right with the world and God..believe you me!!! lol


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Anna on December 02, 2007, 10:01:37 PM
Sharing information with those people and their ilk could hurt the investigation.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Anna on December 02, 2007, 10:13:10 PM
The accusations and lies told on those hate sites are above and beyond anything I have ever seen in my life.  The mother of Julia was suggesting Beth dug up her deceased father and took his arm to plant and was asking if it would have Natalee's DNA as just one example of the kind of things they say daily.

Those things are not OK with me.  I think it is wrong to do things like that and to befriend those who do.  Sorry, yes I guess this is judgmental but I thank God I still have the ability to discern and make judgments when aligning myself with the Right/Good requires me to do so. 

This is not about I'm OK/You're OK.  There is a very definitive line between Good and Evil drawn here, I really believe that.  It is VERY wrong to lie about crime victims, no exceptions.  Even now they are saying that the search is really to plant a body!  I just can't understand defending that kind of behavior.  It's wrong beyond the shadow of any doubt in my mind. 

And yes, there are shades of gray but there are also still black and white.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: private eye on December 02, 2007, 10:14:31 PM
I literally despise Julia, her Mom, and most of the misfits at RU. I have been banned there 3 or 4 times and I still haven't been able to accurately express my outrage at them. They are lucky I cannot reach thru the internet, and I am ashamed at some of the words I have expressed, a little:) But I have known Dave for a long time, and I know he is not a simpleton or a fool, and it is obvious he is willing to lay it on the line to find the truth concerning Natalee. I trust Dave to handle himself in such a manner as to protect the case, Beth, and Natalee's position. Dave would befriend the Devil if he thought the Devil could help, and though I am sure he loves Robin, this isn't going to play out like Eve with the apple and Adam. Dave is firmly in charge, aware, and most assuredly stalking the Truth, and Robin or anyone else isn't going to affect him. He and Beth are on the same page on this adventure. I am positive he is doing the best he can, and I trust Beth to ring his bell if he gets off course.

If it  was up to me, Joran would have already been punished and made to talk, without wasting the courts time and effort, but Beth is a bigger person than I and she is running this show. She supports Dave, has publicly and privately expressed her sipport of his activities, and my past relationship with him supports her views. Robin I actually don't know, but I have to believe she is doing the best she can.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 02, 2007, 10:15:10 PM
But that is what makes Robin and Dave who they are, nice people. Dave is an adjuster, former superintendent of adjusters for the state of Miss, so I imagine his private assessment of Julia is different than his public expression. Dave is pretty sharp despite his good ole boy persona. I hope I said that correctly:)

I agree that Dave and Robin are very nice people.  It's Robin though that posts on the private forums where the same people have said horrible nasty things about Beth and Natalee.  That is what I can't understand. 

Klaas ... in her own words ... her own posts on those forums ...  Robin upholds people with an Aruban agenda who say "horrible nasty things about Beth and Natalee.  I cannot tolerate that.  My loyalties are 100% behind Beth and Natalee.

I have never heard Dave on any interview ever uphold Mark Purcell and Julia Renfro OR those Aruban agenda to distance Paulus and Joran from implication in the events that encompass the morning of May 30, 2005.  I have never hear Dave on any interview ever uphold Mark Purcell and Julia Renfro OR those who imply that Natalee was responsible for her own demise.  Also ... I have never read or heard of Dave ever undermining Beth in any way OR upholding those who do.

Janet

++++++++++++++++++++++

The following quotes are Dave's words and Mark's response in regards to the Julia Renfro inspired article ... The Other Side of the Holloway Case.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=1290.msg192139;topicseen#msg192139

Lively Case Discussion #650 7/3 - 7/4/2007
« Reply #261 on: July 03, 2007, 08:57:08 PM »

The other side of the Holloway-case
‘Police Aruba hindered by FBI’


Credit:  Klaasend
_________________


Dave Holloway
Geraldo At Large
July 21, 2007


HOLLOWAY: Geraldo, there's a group of people, individuals on the island, reporters, disgruntled aruban police investigators and the privately operated tourism department that are engaged in a disinformation campaign in an attempt …

RIVERA: And this is part of it Dave

HOLLOWAY: Yeah, they're in an attempt to minimize Natalee's disappearance on Aruba's image and tourism  …

Transcript Credit: Heli - RU


MARK PURCELL/MIP6 - RESPONSE
July 21, 2007


Well i guess my days of helping have come to an end if this is truly how Dave feels. I guess providing information that goes against the grain of what the 'family' wants to be true is considered miss-information. Cool...finished/done.

++++++++++


Dave Holloway
NANCY GRACE
November 22, 2007


HOLLOWAY:  They have looped off in different directions, but it's always come full circle back to them," he said. "Hopefully, with what they say that they have, this new evidence, maybe we'll finally get some answers.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 02, 2007, 10:15:37 PM
Sharing information with those people and their ilk could hurt the investigation.

Of course, it could, Anna, and if you don't buy into what Mark and his ilk promulgate at BFN, then you can find yourself banned or threatened.  Suffice it to say, I did not find it a friendly venue for justice for Natalee.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: AZSunny on December 02, 2007, 10:16:00 PM
The accusations and lies told on those hate sites are above and beyond anything I have ever seen in my life.  The mother of Julia was suggesting Beth dug up her deceased father and took his arm to plant and was asking if it would have Natalee's DNA as just one example of the kind of things they say daily.

Those things are not OK with me.  I think it is wrong to do things like that and to befriend those who do.  Sorry, yes I guess this is judgmental but I thank God I still have the ability to discern and make judgments when aligning myself with the Right/Good requires me to do so. 

This is not about I'm OK/You're OK.  There is a very definitive line between Good and Evil drawn here, I really believe that.  It is VERY wrong to lie about crime victims, no exceptions.  Even now they are saying that the search is really to plant a body!  I just can't understand defending that kind of behavior.  It's wrong beyond the shadow of any doubt in my mind. 

And yes, there are shades of gray but there are also still black and white.

You are completly correct in my opinion Anna. 

We seem to have brought the board to a hault? 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: private eye on December 02, 2007, 10:18:25 PM
However, if I ever feel the need to address Joran personally, Red seems like the type of guy I would like to have my back::))))))))) I think he and I see eye to eye on how this should have been handled:))))))))))) And I sincerenly appreciate the tremendous support he has provided, not just for Beth but for a slew of victims. He is without a doubt a good man!!!!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: NCDan on December 02, 2007, 10:19:17 PM
But that is what makes Robin and Dave who they are, nice people. Dave is an adjuster, former superintendent of adjusters for the state of Miss, so I imagine his private assessment of Julia is different than his public expression. Dave is pretty sharp despite his good ole boy persona. I hope I said that correctly:)

I agree that Dave and Robin are very nice people.  It's Robin though that posts on the private forums where the same people have said horrible nasty things about Beth and Natalee.  That is what I can't understand. 

Who was it that said "It is very wise to stay closer to your enemies than your friends"? :batman:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2007, 10:20:20 PM
It apprears RU doesn't believe most of Robins post about Beth and Dave's trip to Aruba anyway.  They aren't saying very nice things about it (no surprise).


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 02, 2007, 10:20:31 PM
However, if I ever feel the need to address Joran personally, Red seems like the type of guy I would like to have my back::))))))))) I think he and I see eye to eye on how this should have been handled:))))))))))) And I sincerenly appreciate the tremendous support he has provided, not just for Beth but for a slew of victims. He is without a doubt a good man!!!!!!!

Well said, Private Eye, and I thank you for your input about Dave.  I do feel that he is a great person and probably very focused, but you know I always remember the Mary Matalin and Snakehead marriage, in which you know they share pillow talk and how any candidate could find either totally loyal to another's cause is beyond me. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 02, 2007, 10:22:20 PM
But that is what makes Robin and Dave who they are, nice people. Dave is an adjuster, former superintendent of adjusters for the state of Miss, so I imagine his private assessment of Julia is different than his public expression. Dave is pretty sharp despite his good ole boy persona. I hope I said that correctly:)

I agree that Dave and Robin are very nice people.  It's Robin though that posts on the private forums where the same people have said horrible nasty things about Beth and Natalee.  That is what I can't understand. 

Who was it that said "It is very wise to stay closer to your enemies than your friends"? :batman:

George Bush just before Valerie Plame stabbed him in the back.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Anna on December 02, 2007, 10:33:27 PM
You are completely correct in my opinion Anna. 

We seem to have brought the board to a hault? 


Well, that was not my intention at all.  I am just trying to say that this is not about sausage/pepperoni or vanilla/chocolate.  It's about LYING, for goodness sake.

My mind just does not compute how this is OK to do.  And any information gleaned, whether given intentionally or a slip of the tongue, will not only go straight to the suspects and their defense teams but can be used to prepare a defense, destroy more evidence, anything they can think of to do with it.

I am sure we all think Dave and Robin are very nice people.  That isn't the question.  The question I have is why would Robin prefer the company of those who say these things about Natalee and Beth to those who do not, for example.

  And again this goes to the appearance of doing so, what does it say to those who are supporting this effort at justice?  That just any old thing is OK to say, state as a fact, slander anybody and it's just fine?  It isn't with me.  How can this promote the truth, the sustaining of those who lie?  Are our efforts not appreciate and contrary to the wishes of Natalee's family?  Should we just butt out and allow those who tell these horrible lies about Natalee continue to do so in peace?

I don't know what message I am supposed to take away from this association with the ones who seem to actually hate Natalee.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Kiwi on December 02, 2007, 10:36:03 PM
Just consider Julia as simply using "Infiltration techniques" Her position allows for this. There is a lot more folks that she is getting next too beyond what is being posted. What she is doing would probably work a lot better if she didn't have to defend Joran. Especially after the things he writes about in his book.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Kiwi on December 02, 2007, 10:48:20 PM
Sorry didn't mean to bring things to a stop. You all stand against this.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on December 02, 2007, 10:50:10 PM
However, if I ever feel the need to address Joran personally, Red seems like the type of guy I would like to have my back:)))))))) I think he and I see eye to eye on how this should have been handled:))))))))))) And I sincerenly appreciate the tremendous support he has provided, not just for Beth but for a slew of victims. He is without a doubt a good man!!!!!!!


....and how brudda. :D

....


Good gosh, Anna... digging up an arm?.... blechhhhhhh. Those people
are absolutely awful! I'm all about Nat's family... I stop at any member
who deals in tolerating Julia's frequent trips in psychosis, alcoholic binges, and blunt smoking.

That ol' G-BAG hiefer has one in the grave already, she & Sidalee just didn't get THE MEMO yet!

Try a wireless transmitter with speaker or headphones, on the
hearing the computer in the kitchen or living room thingie. Fairly
inexpensive, at a local box or electronics store.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2007, 10:52:47 PM
Carpe - besides the repeat, was there something on Fox tonight?  RU is talking about Tito and referring to Beth and Dave's recent visit.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Anna on December 02, 2007, 10:53:40 PM
Thanks, Carpe, hadn't thought of wireless transmitter.  That should work if I can figure out how to use one.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Magnolia on December 02, 2007, 10:56:58 PM
Keep in mind that Robin is a stepmother.  I'll bet if anybody said those things about her girls there would be hell to pay.
She post at those boards so is bound to have seen those horrible
things that all of us have seen posted.
I don't understand her agenda or if she has one, but I'll bet Dave hasn't read all of those things.  It is all that I can do to read there.
It is totally sickening, but I do it.
In the interview that Janet posted Dave practically names Julia and
Mark, so he knows that they are up to no good.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on December 02, 2007, 10:57:18 PM
Carpe - besides the repeat, was there something on Fox tonight?  RU is talking about Tito and referring to Beth and Dave's recent visit.

hey klaas,

I have been watching the Pittsburgh game. I will tune in now and see. Up until the Hannity & Colmes show this evening, no not a word.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2007, 10:58:51 PM
From the front page of SM:

Maggie wrote:

Ok, Kimberly covered this story just now on the Lineup. Tito was on about Beth and Dave meeting with the prosecutor. Then guess who? The mouthpiece came on again and started his rant about he was filing papers, then changed it to we are filing papers to get Joran released early. How can he work in Aruba? Someone needs to ask the prosecutor that. Who is paying his bill? He does protest too much. Still none of their stories match, but he has no answer for any of that or the many lies Joran has told. I believe he stated one time that Joran has only told 2 lies. Joe said he has read the 14 pages and nothing new. I thought they had a gag order on the stuff? Then Mickey Sherman said how cruel to do this to this family again. A New York Detective said, these 3 were the last with her and told mulitiple stories.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2007, 11:00:40 PM
Carpe - looks like it was the Lineup


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on December 02, 2007, 11:02:31 PM
I used to feel sorry for the common people on the island but from the reports we've heard they are just as guilty of denial as the kingpins who covered it up. Probably scared for their lives but if they were they should leave the damn place.

Aruba, throw your guilty bastards in prison and we'll leave you alone. Fair enough?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: NCDan on December 02, 2007, 11:03:47 PM
But that is what makes Robin and Dave who they are, nice people. Dave is an adjuster, former superintendent of adjusters for the state of Miss, so I imagine his private assessment of Julia is different than his public expression. Dave is pretty sharp despite his good ole boy persona. I hope I said that correctly:)

I agree that Dave and Robin are very nice people.  It's Robin though that posts on the private forums where the same people have said horrible nasty things about Beth and Natalee.  That is what I can't understand. 

Who was it that said "It is very wise to stay closer to your enemies than your friends"? :batman:

George Bush just before Valerie Plame stabbed him in the back.
George values loyalty and he assumes those close to him are friends. He would not be an example of someone who does practices that. Robin could be smart to hang around the very place that opposes them to find out who among them is closest to the perpetrators. It is likely that some RU posters (but not all) are close to the perps and consider it advantageous to defame H-T. The effort might yield results. Maybe not. But it could be worth trying. It takes us out of the twilight zone.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: wreck on December 02, 2007, 11:04:24 PM
I have been away for several hours and have just now "caught up." Words escape me about Robin.
Damn it -- COME HERE and state your position.  That is when and ONLY WHEN I will respect what you have to say. If this is truly your belief -- I will shut up and never say another word. I know you read here. I cannot fathom that your husband supports you in this. :-|


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on December 02, 2007, 11:07:10 PM
From the front page of SM:

Maggie wrote:

Ok, Kimberly covered this story just now on the Lineup. Tito was on about Beth and Dave meeting with the prosecutor. Then guess who? The mouthpiece came on again and started his rant about he was filing papers, then changed it to we are filing papers to get Joran released early. How can he work in Aruba? Someone needs to ask the prosecutor that. Who is paying his bill? He does protest too much. Still none of their stories match, but he has no answer for any of that or the many lies Joran has told. I believe he stated one time that Joran has only told 2 lies. Joe said he has read the 14 pages and nothing new. I thought they had a gag order on the stuff? Then Mickey Sherman said how cruel to do this to this family again. A New York Detective said, these 3 were the last with her and told mulitiple stories.




Joe said "we're" filing a motion tomorrow to try to get Joran sprung earlier. When did he get his license to practice law in Aruba? He even lies on the little shit but so does his client so they are two birds of a feather.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2007, 11:07:30 PM
I have been away for several hours and have just now "caught up." Words escape me about Robin.
Damn it -- COME HERE and state your position.  That is when and ONLY WHEN I will respect what you have to say. If this is truly your belief -- I will shut up and never say another word. I know you read here. I cannot fathom that your husband supports you in this. :-|

I'm not so sure Robin reads here.  She has BFN, BNH and RU to keep up with. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Kiwi on December 02, 2007, 11:12:36 PM
I have been away for several hours and have just now "caught up." Words escape me about Robin.
Damn it -- COME HERE and state your position.  That is when and ONLY WHEN I will respect what you have to say. If this is truly your belief -- I will shut up and never say another word. I know you read here. I cannot fathom that your husband supports you in this. :-|

I'm not so sure Robin reads here.  She has BFN, BNH and RU to keep up with. 
That would be a shame


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: wreck on December 02, 2007, 11:13:28 PM
I have been away for several hours and have just now "caught up." Words escape me about Robin.
Damn it -- COME HERE and state your position.  That is when and ONLY WHEN I will respect what you have to say. If this is truly your belief -- I will shut up and never say another word. I know you read here. I cannot fathom that your husband supports you in this. :-|

I'm not so sure Robin reads here.  She has BFN, BNH and RU to keep up with. 
I cannot accept that. Even if there were 100 sites that analyized the case of YOUR own stepdaughter -- you would read every DAMN one of them. She reads here.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: dennisintn on December 02, 2007, 11:14:05 PM
kimberly did a masterlful job of making tito do a l80 degree turnaround.  he was repeating julia's "6 hour interrogation of beth" bit when kimberly cut him off and said what a good thing it was for mos to accept beth and dave's suggestion that they come talk to him.  i loved it.  can you imagine what mos and the new team are thinking after meeting beth and dave and only have julia and dompig's opinions of them in advance?  this might just open some eyes down there.
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on December 02, 2007, 11:14:32 PM
Carpe - looks like it was the Lineup

I'll catch it on the re-run, if they have it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: thecuz on December 02, 2007, 11:18:43 PM
thanks dennis...i turned on the lineup right when tito was hanging up...was wondering what he had to say.....good for kimberly....now if they would only wise up and stop letting lackopenis open his big mouth!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2007, 11:19:12 PM
kimberly did a masterlful job of making tito do a l80 degree turnaround.  he was repeating julia's "6 hour interrogation of beth" bit when kimberly cut him off and said what a good thing it was for mos to accept beth and dave's suggestion that they come talk to him.  i loved it.  can you imagine what mos and the new team are thinking after meeting beth and dave and only have julia and dompig's opinions of them in advance?  this might just open some eyes down there.
dennisintn

Wish I'd seen it!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2007, 11:19:43 PM
Carpe - looks like it was the Lineup

I'll catch it on the re-run, if they have it.

Thanks Carpe!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Kiwi on December 02, 2007, 11:21:03 PM
kimberly did a masterlful job of making tito do a l80 degree turnaround.  he was repeating julia's "6 hour interrogation of beth" bit when kimberly cut him off and said what a good thing it was for mos to accept beth and dave's suggestion that they come talk to him.  i loved it.  can you imagine what mos and the new team are thinking after meeting beth and dave and only have julia and dompig's opinions of them in advance?  this might just open some eyes down there.
dennisintn
It's always time to stand up for the truth!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 02, 2007, 11:24:50 PM
The Robin Holloway issue is so upsetting for me ... I end up in tears  every time the topic surfaces.  It just does not make sense

Good Night Monkeys ... a game of 500 rummy awaits me.   :)

Janet
8:25 PM


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: dennisintn on December 02, 2007, 11:30:45 PM
this and i'll shut up.  kimberley also show interviews she had done with anita and nadira.  anita was totally irritated.  she said "beth told me that natalee was a virgin, and i thought to myself, so?"  then she went on about how sweet and good and harmless to women jvds was, her precious sporter.  obviously this was before his book came out or she hasn't brought herself to read it yet.  nadira said her boys were such good boys and satish had to redo his senior year and i think she said something about school in miami for one of them.  says satish still wants to do medicine or be a pilot. and i guess we're going to have to find some other suspects for that sunday night ride because she said her boys are always home at night except sometimes friday and saturday nights they might go out.  that ultra-pious look on her face when she tells these lies is amazing.  unless you remember "the boys lied, i lied, everybody lies".  greta would probably think she was credible.  i don't.
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2007, 11:33:02 PM
The current GLOBE has something on the case.  San is scanning it for us right now.  Will post as soon as I get it from San.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: dennisintn on December 02, 2007, 11:35:27 PM


the lineup is on again at l2:00 midnight cst, if you want to see it then.  lol, now i am going to just be quiet and read.
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2007, 11:37:11 PM


the lineup is on again at l2:00 midnight cst, if you want to see it then.  lol, now i am going to just be quiet and read.
dennisintn

Dennis - at RU they are saying the interviews with Nadira and Anita were older ones like maybe from a year ago?  Did you get that impression?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: dennisintn on December 02, 2007, 11:45:15 PM


klaasend, they were at least several months old, maybe a year old.  lol, recently enough that anita and nadira had their backs up and spitting out the words against beth.  at least in anita's case.  i had never seen the interviews before and kimberley was on the island, i'm almost positive of that. 
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: sb on December 02, 2007, 11:46:29 PM
Not totally up to speed yet but I am getting the gist of what Robin posted and also our Monkey comments.

I have met both Beth and Robin. I know their styles. Beth is forthright, Robin is a honey-not-salt type. Robin is trying to keep her enemies closer. I don't believe for a minute that she or Dave has any pretensions whatsoever about the agenda of mip6 or glenda. They are simply trying to approach this thing in a direction that at least keeps some contact with that side of the case and may allow them to glean some info.

I have said it before and I will say it again: I see NO jealousy whatsoever between Beth and Robin. They act like sisters together. Being a male, I don't view their relationship through kittycat glasses like some of our female posters do who seem hard-wired to spot the first faint signs of female-to-female conflict in every move they make. I know that sounds harsh (sorry to those who don't like me saying that) but to be honest, I find this fault-finding toward Robin and this microscopic examination of her every move and dissection of same to be somewhat childish and unbecoming.

I will stand by my statements before:  Robin has NO anti-Beth agenda whatsoever. Let's not go there again... That kind of stuff got this cage closed before for about 2 weeks and now ain't the time, it's too critical.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on December 02, 2007, 11:47:21 PM
Ok, catching up here.  After trying to comprehend what Robin said, the only thing I can come up with is, maybe her and Beth are not on the best of terms, so she doesn't care what is said about Beth, only Natalee.  So she may not care what Renho put Beth through, since it wasn't Dave that experienced her evil-ness.  I am NOT defending anybody here, just running some ideas/thoughts through my head.  Yes, Robin may be somewhat naive, and Renho is leading her on, but Robin doesn't care about 'Beth' and what she's going through, she only cares about Dave.  I'm not sure of the relationship now between Beth and Dave, but it could be he is not too concerned now for Beth either, nor cares what they say and do to her.  They happen to have the same goal, which is FIND Natalee!  However, they are going about it in different ways, with different contacts and means.  Am I making sense?

I also agree with Nut about keeping your enemies closer.....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: sb on December 02, 2007, 11:49:20 PM
Let me add one thing:

I see no difference at all between how Robin deals with glenda, and how Beth deals with Greta.

Both are holding their noses and putting up with the smell in the hope they may get some help.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on December 02, 2007, 11:49:49 PM
Not totally up to speed yet but I am getting the gist of what Robin posted and also our Monkey comments.

I have met both Beth and Robin. I know their styles. Beth is forthright, Robin is a honey-not-salt type. Robin is trying to keep her enemies closer. I don't believe for a minute that she or Dave has any pretensions whatsoever about the agenda of mip6 or glenda. They are simply trying to approach this thing in a direction that at least keeps some contact with that side of the case and may allow them to glean some info.

I have said it before and I will say it again: I see NO jealousy whatsoever between Beth and Robin. They act like sisters together. Being a male, I don't view their relationship through kittycat glasses like some of our female posters do who seem hard-wired to spot the first faint signs of female-to-female conflict in every move they make. I know that sounds harsh (sorry to those who don't like me saying that) but to be honest, I find this fault-finding toward Robin and this microscopic examination of her every move and dissection of same to be somewhat childish and unbecoming.

I will stand by my statements before:  Robin has NO anti-Beth agenda whatsoever. Let's not go there again... That kind of stuff got this cage closed before for about 2 weeks and now ain't the time, it's too critical.

Well that puts a different twist to my post.   I wasn't sure, so was just assuming.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on December 02, 2007, 11:52:26 PM
kimberly did a masterlful job of making tito do a l80 degree turnaround.  he was repeating julia's "6 hour interrogation of beth" bit when kimberly cut him off and said what a good thing it was for mos to accept beth and dave's suggestion that they come talk to him.  i loved it.  can you imagine what mos and the new team are thinking after meeting beth and dave and only have julia and dompig's opinions of them in advance?  this might just open some eyes down there.
dennisintn

I missed it, but I love Kimberly!  She does NOT let anybody off the hook! 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: sb on December 02, 2007, 11:53:10 PM
Dihannah, I have seen them all IN THE SAME ROOM and I don't see any rift between any of the parties. They are dialed in to get answers and not in the mood for catfights. I know some may say "Well, they were just acting.." but I don't think so.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on December 02, 2007, 11:56:15 PM
Dihannah, I have seen them all IN THE SAME ROOM and I don't see any rift between any of the parties. They are dialed in to get answers and not in the mood for catfights. I know some may say "Well, they were just acting.." but I don't think so.

Thanks SB.  I envy you for getting to meet them!  ;)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: wreck on December 02, 2007, 11:56:47 PM
Dihannah, I have seen them all IN THE SAME ROOM and I don't see any rift between any of the parties. They are dialed in to get answers and not in the mood for catfights. I know some may say "Well, they were just acting.." but I don't think so.
I trust you SB. I will shut up. I don't get it --- but this the last word from me. :-|


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: robots on December 02, 2007, 11:57:15 PM
aruba is just a nasty place


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Kiwi on December 02, 2007, 11:57:31 PM
Let me add one thing:

I see no difference at all between how Robin deals with glenda, and how Beth deals with Greta.

Both are holding their noses and putting up with the smell in the hope they may get some help.
Well said and I glad to here that our side is playing their hand wisely!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Kiwi on December 02, 2007, 11:59:35 PM
aruba is just a nasty place
Exactly!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2007, 11:59:48 PM
From the GLOBE 12/10/07 - Thanks San!

Page 1
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/Globe121007a.jpg)
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/Globe121007c.jpg)

Page 2
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/Globe121007b.jpg)
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/Globe121007d.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: robots on December 02, 2007, 11:59:57 PM
the only way this will get to trial is to force it to trial

BOYCOTT - SPREAD the NEWS


KNOCK aruba upside down with the economy

Humppphhh.. is that a terrorsit threat ??? :lol: :lol:

nawwwwwwwwwww.. more like a promise  :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: robots on December 03, 2007, 12:02:13 AM
going to get some snow.

puttering all day with the thrower....still aint running

tried everything except drain the gas and put in fresh......

i would prefer to drain aruba economy  :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: sb on December 03, 2007, 12:04:14 AM
I don't consider myself an "insider" to their relationship at all, but I am just not seeing this epic mother-stepmother struggle that some keep alluding to. People are extrapolating their own experiences and trying to use that to state that this family is going to act a certain way "because all split families do..."

Not all split families have to deal with a situation like this.

Are there going to be disagreements? YES! The most harmonious relationships have ups and downs. But there is assuredly NOT this deep underlying battle for Natalee's affections that has spilled over into the case, like some are trying to find.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: dennisintn on December 03, 2007, 12:06:18 AM

there are no two people on this earth exactly alike.  if there were 2 people exactly alike, one of them would be redundant.  since the day natalee disappeared, i haven't missed a day keeping up or catching up on what was being said and done.  i was, and still am, in total awe of the way natalee's entire family, inlaws, outlaws, and step-parents have used their individual talents and skills and personalities to the best of their ability to find natalee and keep the case going until it's solved.  they have not chewed on each other, or blamed each other, or done anything other than the very best they could do for natalee.  with a family like she had, it's easy to see how natalee turned out to be the winner and wonderful human being that she was.  she would be proud of all of them.  
there is not a single one of them that has done everything just exactly like would have done it, there isn't a single one of them that has done anything worse than i would have done it.  they are all "there", boots on the ground, doing the best they can under ferocious pressure and hatred that would have had me in serious trouble with the law had i been in their boots.  all i can do is sit and read and pray and type and even cry sometimes over what has and continues to happen.  what i started out to say is "leave them alone, don't second guess them, and support what each of them is doing".  they have reminded me more of a well-tuned, superbly handled and guided machine that has taken care of natalee's business just like it did for the l8 years she was with them.  i do not expect perfection out of human beings, and i am as proud of them all as natalee would be.
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 03, 2007, 12:07:40 AM
What I saw and heard on Kimberly G's program.  Tito said that Beth went to the prosecutor's office today as she promised and then the prosecutor left and the interrogators interrogated her for about 6-1/2 hours and Beth was not very happy when she left and would not speak to anyone.

Then Kimberly said that is totally different from the impression we had been given, that the prosecutor wanted to share with her and Dave and ask them questions that might assist, and then Tito changes his tune to one that is more friendly to the prosecutor and Beth, Dave.  But, yes, he is just like that crude Julia Renfro, constantly debasing Beth.  I am sure that pit is roaring in hell for some.

Light the fire, Shango.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: sb on December 03, 2007, 12:08:25 AM
the only way this will get to trial is to force it to trial

BOYCOTT - SPREAD the NEWS


KNOCK aruba upside down with the economy

Humppphhh.. is that a terrorist threat ??? :lol: :lol:

nawwwwwwwwwww.. more like a promise  :cool:

Hey robots, don't you know that one man's "message economics" is another man's "economic terrorism"?  :wink: LOL


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2007, 12:08:28 AM
Posted by Heli at RU:

The Lineup Dec 2, 2007 TRANSCRIPT

The Lineup
December 2, 2007

Transcribed from DVD recording by Heli

Kimberley:

Now with the Judge ruling that the Kalpoe brothers can no longer be held in jail, what was one thought of a promise to find out what happened to Natalee Holloway may now seem to be a little less likely.

Joining us from Aruba with the very latest is journalist Tito Lacle. Tito, thanks for joinin me and the latest development that we're hearing is that the Kalpoe brothers are out and what is the new information that aruban authorities interrogated Beth Holloway for 5 hours on Saturday?

Tito:

That's true what you just mentioned. A few minutes ago, actually about an hour and a half ago the latest one of the brothers, Deepak, was released from jail and was picked up by his lawyer and the lawyer for Satish too. His brother Satish was released about an hour earlier from another prison in another City and they're both safe and sound at home and awaiting for the word about what happens to their fate come December 31.

As for the second part, yes Beth Holloway came in this morning about 9 o'clock, about 1/2 hour later than expected in a police station in the city Oranjestadt and after which she was put in a conversation with the prosecuting office, Hans Mos and Dop Kruimel After that was finished both the prosecutors left the office or left the police station and by surprise the interrogators came in and (inaudible) by Dolph Richardson the chief investigaor, they started interrogating her which lasted for over 5 hours. She left not very happy and wouldn't say anything on camera. She left the police department about 2:30

Kimberley:

I think people are going to be surprised by that because the latest that I ahd heard was that Dave Holloway and Beth were going to Aruba to present evidence , information that they have from their own private investigation into the disappearance of their daughter, that they wanted to provide that to the prosecutors, hear where the case stood with the prosecutors and sort of have this symbiotic relationship where they could finally work together because they didn't get to have that with the previous prosecutor, Karin Janssen

Tito:

That is correct. I must say the prosecuting team is totally different one than before, more open and they said yesterday they accepted the invitation of the Holloways to come to Aruba and have a conversation because they have a right to find out what happened so far and we are (inaudible) to give them all that information so they were very happy to share the information with the Holloways

Kimberley:

Alright, Tito thank you for that update, we certainly appreciate it.

And now we are joined by Joe Tacopina who is the attorney for Joran van der Sloot.

So Joe you were saying that there's no new evidence and that your client would be released. I know he wasn't up for review yet, but do you think overall it's a good sign for him because the Kalpoes were sprung?

Joe:

Of course it's a good sign, I mean look it's the same new evidence that was incriminating of "serious stuff" against all three. It's only a matter of time now until Joran gets released in fact we've filed, we will be filing first thing on Monday morning for his immediate release as opposed to waiting towards the end of the week

Kimberley:

So you're saying there's really no new evidence or is there perhaps some new evidence they haven't even shared with you guys besides the 14 or so pages of discovery because we're hearing about reports of forensic retrieval of computer, e-mail messages and that type of things

Joe:

There's no new evidence, look we're here in December now, they accept their own deadline for December 31. I've seen the 14 pages, there's no new evidence and there's certainly no new incriminating evidence and the funniest thing out of yesterday's press conference that I heard from the prosecutor was when he said "we were really disappointed with this ruling because we really wanted a chance to confront them with this new evidence" Well, they had 8 days, what are they waiting for, when were they going to confront them

Kimberley:

But I've also been told that in Aruba you can't be held beyond the 8 days unless they think you're guilty of a crime that carriest a term longer than 4 years so that may actually explain it and they say you can't be held for something like dumping, movement of a dead body, but there's a lot to talk about and I have to get to the panel, but keep us posted about Joran.

I need to bring in Dr Michael Baden who joins us now. Dr. Baden we also understand that there's new developments under way in terms of searching the area for Natalee's body. A new ship has come on with special sonar equipment that the Holloways at least think could be very optimistic in terms of finding Natalee and what everyone wants to know is ok it's been quite a long time, is there still evidenciary value if they recover anything?

Baden:

Yeah it is possible to find a body using all new technologies that's been in the water as long as Natalee Holloway and the teeth, the DNA, the bones will still be in good shape. They'll be able to make identification; if there are injuries to the body they'll be able to still after this time has passed, still be able to identify injuries to the bones if the body is in some kind of a container or some kind of clothing. So it is possible to get a great deal of information if they find some kind of remnants of the body

Kimberley:

And of course I'll bring in Pat Brosnan, of course the prosecutor is saying he has sufficient evidence to suggest that Natalee Holloway is deceased, she is no longer with us. I think they feel they've overcome that obstacle, the body of course would no doubt help but you have to look at the case here with the Kalpoe brothers and Joran and they're still saying just even if you find her body, even if Natalee Holloway is deceased it doesn't mean we had anything to do with it however, they're the lsat ones to be seen with her and they've had multiple changes in their stories.

Brosnan:

Absolutely, and looking at it without any new evidence that might have came in, it seems like nothing of any substantive value came in, the only theory that I could even advance for them bringing them in for this 8 day interrogation is perhaps by putting them in different locations and with the passage of time, even though these guys are battle hardened veterans to investigative bullying, they've been there done that back in June of '05 for 4 months, they're tough but they're also young and they could have a measure of naivety on them, perhaps they could divide and conquer. To get someone to make a misstep

Kimberley:

Well that's what they need to get in this case or else they won't be able to move the ball forward

Mickey Sherman:

It's just cruel to the family to have done this, it's like one of these John Mark Karr things where we finally got the guilty guy and they didn't have wit closer in the case and to do this, put the victim's family through this is cruel, they should not have gone forward

Kimberley:

This whole ending of the case, they're saying we need to decide whether we're going to bring charges against them by the end of the year but it goes in front of a Judge and this Judge isn't finding that there's sufficient evidence to hold them beyond the 8 days. How is that going to amount to a conviction at this point unless they got anothe statement in this little squeeze play

Mickey Sherman:

And again, they've been through that little bully process and don't forget they arrested 2 other guys before these guys, then they arrested these guys then they unarrested these guys and now they arrested them again. What jury, I don't care what country you're in, is going to have any kind of confidence in this.

Kimberley:

That's the problem, it really is.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2007, 12:11:01 AM
Posted by Lazlo at RU (makes sense):

Lazlo Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2007 12:06 am   

They probably wanted to question Beth about all the claims made recently by a source called "Trina".

Gielen made it to the newspapers to have "Trina" on tape claming Jug told her Natalee just got out of rehab, and Natalee using her creditcard twice after she disappeared.

They cannot and would not want to ignore this, even the "FBI hearings" made it to the Dutch Parliament even though it was just an internet initiative.

If they go to trial they cannot have "Trina" appearing as a witness making all sort of claims, so they probably confronted Beth with that and whatever else and may have asked her to provide material, to not have any surpises if this goes to trial, IMO 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 03, 2007, 12:11:15 AM
I think Tito and Julia are still smarting from Tito and Julia not being able to coerce jobs at Fox. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: robots on December 03, 2007, 12:12:31 AM
the only way this will get to trial is to force it to trial

BOYCOTT - SPREAD the NEWS


KNOCK aruba upside down with the economy

Humppphhh.. is that a terrorist threat ??? :lol: :lol:

nawwwwwwwwwww.. more like a promise  :cool:

Hey robots, don't you know that one man's "message economics" is another man's "economic terrorism"?  :wink: LOL
:P :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: sb on December 03, 2007, 12:12:56 AM
See y'all tomorrow sometime...

Let Us Continue


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: robots on December 03, 2007, 12:14:21 AM
Posted by Lazlo at RU (makes sense):

Lazlo Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2007 12:06 am   

They probably wanted to question Beth about all the claims made recently by a source called "Trina".

Gielen made it to the newspapers to have "Trina" on tape claming Jug told her Natalee just got out of rehab, and Natalee using her creditcard twice after she disappeared.

They cannot and would not want to ignore this, even the "FBI hearings" made it to the Dutch Parliament even though it was just an internet initiative.

If they go to trial they cannot have "Trina" appearing as a witness making all sort of claims, so they probably confronted Beth with that and whatever else and may have asked her to provide material, to not have any surpises if this goes to trial, IMO 


RENHOG at it again, she must be in love with joran


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Kiwi on December 03, 2007, 12:21:30 AM
So Robots can you confirm this do aliens really have ATM's on their ships?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 03, 2007, 12:26:53 AM
Thanks to San for providing the Globe article to Klaas for posting here.... :smt038 :thumright:

I'm thinking Trina needs to go for rehab....jmho at this hour... :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: robots on December 03, 2007, 12:28:18 AM
So Robots can you confirm this do aliens really have ATM's on their ships?
:cool: :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2007, 12:34:12 AM
O/T from the Fox website:

Breaking News >> Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez Has Lost Constitutional Vote, Says Electoral Chief
 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: dennisintn on December 03, 2007, 12:35:31 AM
Thanks to San for providing the Globe article to Klaas for posting here.... :smt038 :thumright:

I'm thinking Trina needs to go for rehab....jmho at this hour... :wink:

lol, i think "trina only exists in renee's head, or whatever part of her anatomy that functions as a brain.  and i agree with you, "trina" and the rest of renee could use some rehab. time.  maybe decades of it.
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: dennisintn on December 03, 2007, 12:37:58 AM
O/T from the Fox website:

Breaking News >> Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez Has Lost Constitutional Vote, Says Electoral Chief
 

thanks for the news, klaa.  tomorrow hugo will declare that the boxes were stuffed, the election was a fraud, and he was only kidding anyway.  tuesday, the shooting will start.
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2007, 12:42:25 AM
O/T from the Fox website:

Breaking News >> Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez Has Lost Constitutional Vote, Says Electoral Chief
 

thanks for the news, klaa.  tomorrow hugo will declare that the boxes were stuffed, the election was a fraud, and he was only kidding anyway.  tuesday, the shooting will start.
dennisintn

Sadly most likely true.  Then he'll declare Aruba is now VenezAruba and Oduber reports to him  :wink:

Or, Arubazuela  :lol:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/ArubaZuela2.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Magnolia on December 03, 2007, 12:45:07 AM
Posted by Lazlo at RU (makes sense):

Lazlo Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2007 12:06 am   

They probably wanted to question Beth about all the claims made recently by a source called "Trina".

Gielen made it to the newspapers to have "Trina" on tape claming Jug told her Natalee just got out of rehab, and Natalee using her creditcard twice after she disappeared.

They cannot and would not want to ignore this, even the "FBI hearings" made it to the Dutch Parliament even though it was just an internet initiative.

If they go to trial they cannot have "Trina" appearing as a witness making all sort of claims, so they probably confronted Beth with that and whatever else and may have asked her to provide material, to not have any surpises if this goes to trial, IMO 


RENHOG at it again, she must be in love with joran


Renhog is in love with Renfro and nobody else.  She saw this case as her rise to fame.
When Beth saw through her she turned on Beth and has been at it ever since.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: dennisintn on December 03, 2007, 12:46:21 AM
O/T from the Fox website:

Breaking News >> Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez Has Lost Constitutional Vote, Says Electoral Chief
 


suits the hell out of me, as long as he lets the ship search for natalee.  the durn place couldn't possibly be run any worse than it is currently being managed.
dennisintn

thanks for the news, klaa.  tomorrow hugo will declare that the boxes were stuffed, the election was a fraud, and he was only kidding anyway.  tuesday, the shooting will start.
dennisintn

Sadly most likely true.  Then he'll declare Aruba is now VenezAruba and Oduber reports to him  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: dennisintn on December 03, 2007, 12:49:50 AM
[


Renhog is in love with Renfro and nobody else.  She saw this case as her rise to fame.
When Beth saw through her she turned on Beth and has been at it ever since.
[/quote]


lol, truer words were never spoken.
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 03, 2007, 01:19:36 AM
Since I'm still up, I'm watching The Lineup with Kimberley....looks like Peterson & others (Preppie murderer, etc.) will be on before Natalee's info.  I've read the Heli transcript, but prefer seeing it myself..fwiw.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2007, 01:31:14 AM
Posted by PearlinUSA at BFN:

Article in amigoe dutch about the meeting with parents .. translated..

 ORANJESTAD - the Public Prosecution Service has discussed the request of the parents of Natalee Holloway, Dave Holloway and Beth Reynolds (Twitty), for a conversation.

 Saturday talk they on Aruba with the chief public prosecutor, Hans mos, concerning the last developments in the disappearance matter of their for the, of he who it is adopted that she is dead.

Beth Reynolds - which have separated of Holloway and later also of Jug Twitty - have to have waited for a long time at the moment a maintenance with justice.

 Two years suffered the then head officier Karin Janssen, who returned to the Netherlands, in this no appetite have had.

 According to Public Prosecution Service it has been chosen there for this time this way open possible be concerning the renewed research, where suspected three - Joran of of the ditch and the brothers Deepak and Satish Kalpoe - because of alleged maltreatment and doodslag of Natalee Holloway, has been again fixed.

"we are a Public Prosecution Service", react head officier Hans mos with the emphasis to ` in public.

 We want also take into account the feelings of victims and are not only busy truth astuteness.

 But also the society must be kept as well as possible informed, because of the large impact of this matter.

 How the years there two went suffered from with supplying information were desastreus for Aruba.

We will play no verstoppertje and tell what we can.

Beth and Dave arrive both in the course of today.

They would be prepared the information which they gathered separate at each other to join.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Scandi on December 03, 2007, 01:43:04 AM
Since I'm still up, I'm watching The Lineup with Kimberley....looks like Peterson & others (Preppie murderer, etc.) will be on before Natalee's info.  I've read the Heli transcript, but prefer seeing it myself..fwiw.



Hi 2NJSons,  I really think Kimberly does a GREAT job.  She has some snap and a bit of sass 'n spunk that leads her in dealing with some of these TH's.  I remember her before she got her own show, even to when she was the new kid on the block at FOX, and she has become the perfect hostess for a news show that deals mainly with crimes.  She has Greta beat hands over IMO as for one thing she doesn't get all limp with male guests. 

I listened to Joran talk to Greta on that Special yesterday, and he talks so weird - doesn't innunciate at all, runs all his words down to the bottom of each breath, well, made me nervous just listening to him.  What a dopey looking guy he is.  Purely pathetic is what I think.

Night guys, and thanks for all the stimulating convo!  HEAR HEAR  (http://forum.rscnet.org/images/smilies/static.gif)(http://forum.rscnet.org/images/smilies/static.gif)

Nite All  xox


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2007, 01:45:34 AM
Nite Scandi

I'm calling it a night too - GOODNIGHT ALL!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on December 03, 2007, 02:00:09 AM
KLAAS, I'M UPLOADING NOW.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 03, 2007, 02:04:53 AM
Posted by Lazlo at RU (makes sense):

Lazlo Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2007 12:06 am   

They probably wanted to question Beth about all the claims made recently by a source called "Trina".

Gielen made it to the newspapers to have "Trina" on tape claming Jug told her Natalee just got out of rehab, and Natalee using her creditcard twice after she disappeared.

They cannot and would not want to ignore this, even the "FBI hearings" made it to the Dutch Parliament even though it was just an internet initiative.

If they go to trial they cannot have "Trina" appearing as a witness making all sort of claims, so they probably confronted Beth with that and whatever else and may have asked her to provide material, to not have any surpises if this goes to trial, IMO 


RENHOG at it again, she must be in love with joran

Did she get this on tape before or after Jug shoved her?  Just wondering.  No surprises here.  Still trying to put out someone else's light and make hers shine a little brighter.  Put a bushel barrel over the Renfro.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2007, 02:07:15 AM
KLAAS, I'M UPLOADING NOW.

Thanks Carpe!  I know sometimes Youtube can take a long time uploading.  If you could post the link in here I'd appreciate it.

Goodnight again!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: alash on December 03, 2007, 02:18:38 AM
When do we find out if Joran is currently detained?  (Possible we already know and I missed it.)  Any news and or speculation as to what is going to happen next?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on December 03, 2007, 02:31:44 AM
KIM GUILFOYLE THE LINE UP SUNDAY NIGHT FOX PART #1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uxgqo0OGTuA


KIM GUILFOYLE THE LINE UP SUNDAY NIGHT FOX PART #2


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=itfQ1pnfsSU






Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 03, 2007, 02:33:10 AM
Since I'm still up, I'm watching The Lineup with Kimberley....looks like Peterson & others (Preppie murderer, etc.) will be on before Natalee's info.  I've read the Heli transcript, but prefer seeing it myself..fwiw.



Hi 2NJSons,  I really think Kimberly does a GREAT job.  She has some snap and a bit of sass 'n spunk that leads her in dealing with some of these TH's.  I remember her before she got her own show, even to when she was the new kid on the block at FOX, and she has become the perfect hostess for a news show that deals mainly with crimes.  She has Greta beat hands over IMO as for one thing she doesn't get all limp with male guests. 

I listened to Joran talk to Greta on that Special yesterday, and he talks so weird - doesn't innunciate at all, runs all his words down to the bottom of each breath, well, made me nervous just listening to him.  What a dopey looking guy he is.  Purely pathetic is what I think.

Night guys, and thanks for all the stimulating convo!  HEAR HEAR  (http://forum.recent.orgy/images/smilies/static.gif)(http://forum.recent.orgy/images/smilies/static.gif)

Niter All xix

I have always felt the same about Kimberley, but when she spoke to Joe T. tonight, at the end, I watched her laughing as they finished...just not sure about the camaraderie in that group....time will tell.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: IBE on December 03, 2007, 05:47:40 AM

Just hit the wires:

Consumer group warns of counterfeit Tickle Me Tito toys


The latest Tickle Me Tito version is slated to be one of this season's most popular holiday toy requests and one of the most difficult to find.

The toy, which is known for its distinctive laugh when it is tickled, has been counterfeited. And the fake Tito has appeared in two major Baltimore shopping malls at kiosks.

Read more on this story at Yahoot.com.


Oh darn... I should have waited. :roll: I just bought a Elmo that laughs when you tickle him.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Peaches on December 03, 2007, 06:53:57 AM
Posted by Glenda at Ru:

Quote
You mean the fisherman who didn't report a crab trap stolen although that is the premise for the Million Dollar Search for Natalee. Did I read here that the owner of the boat was quoted saying her remains would still be intact because the water is sooo cold. What is the definition of Cold? Because this water is like a warm bathtub.


Question for Glenda:  When was the last time you dove to 1000 feet?   

I think it was actually Dr.Baden who said the water temperature would preserve the body if it were on the bottom of the ocean. 

Somebody please put an anchor around this skank's neck and let her evaluate the ocean from close up............really close up.

Good morning.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: blah on December 03, 2007, 06:57:12 AM
Posted by Lazlo at RU (makes sense):

Lazlo Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2007 12:06 am   

They probably wanted to question Beth about all the claims made recently by a source called "Trina".

Gielen made it to the newspapers to have "Trina" on tape claming Jug told her Natalee just got out of rehab, and Natalee using her creditcard twice after she disappeared.

They cannot and would not want to ignore this, even the "FBI hearings" made it to the Dutch Parliament even though it was just an internet initiative.

If they go to trial they cannot have "Trina" appearing as a witness making all sort of claims, so they probably confronted Beth with that and whatever else and may have asked her to provide material, to not have any surpises if this goes to trial, IMO 


Isnt it funny how they take the things from the perps own actions and try to stick them on Natalee somehow?

I believe it was JORAN who was in some sort of rehab/seeing a shrink

And it was Paulus who was using the credt/debit cards in the middle of the night after Natalee was last seen.

Somehow, they take those facts and try to spin them away from the perps and onto Natalee.  They really need to try a little harder than that.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on December 03, 2007, 07:09:38 AM
Posted by Glenda at Ru:

Quote
You mean the fisherman who didn't report a crab trap stolen although that is the premise for the Million Dollar Search for Natalee. Did I read here that the owner of the boat was quoted saying her remains would still be intact because the water is sooo cold. What is the definition of Cold? Because this water is like a warm bathtub.


Question for Glenda:  When was the last time you dove to 1000 feet?   

I think it was actually Dr.Baden who said the water temperature would preserve the body if it were on the bottom of the ocean. 

Somebody please put an anchor around this skank's neck and let her evaluate the ocean from close up............really close up.

Good morning.


Mornin' Peaches  :D


http://tinyurl.com/2jkk6z





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Peaches on December 03, 2007, 07:23:17 AM
Someone  emailed this  to me it's from Robin Holloway
I think she talking about Mark in aruba not Mark F
If you already have it you can delete it TY

Dave is currently on his way home to Meridian. Beth is on her way back also. They met with the KLPD and OM yesterday. I guess there is a miscommunication between interrogation and questioning. They had a lot of questions for Dave and Beth in efforts to help Natalee’s case and dispel a lot of nasty rumours. Also, Dave and Beth had a lot of questions for them too in regards to Natalee’s case. The meeting went well and they are working hard, but we don’t know what will happen next and pray this water search will turn up something. As far as Julia, we have stayed in contact with her and she truly does care for Natalee and wants to know what happened to her as much as anyone else. Dave was able to meet with Mark for a little while last night while he was there and had a nice visit. It is good to know they are still there and willing to help. Please know they are still there too for Natalee.

For now, waiting on Dave to get home and will watch the news or wait on that phone call to see what will happen next. It’s been a long two and a half years and never dreamed this much time would go by with no answers. Thanks to all of you for your continued support and for hanging in there with us. Thank you Debbie for coming to Meridian to hang out with the girls, Matt and me. I was a nervous wreck and glad you were able to make time for us this weekend. Brooke just got in from a playdate and was upset she didn’t get to say goodbye Sad I don’t think she realized you would be gone before she got home.

The boat should be in Aruba depending on the weather between Thurs and Saturday. Will keep you updated.



Sorry but I call BS on the red highlighted above.  I think it's a huge problem to trust Julia Renfro or Mark Purcell.  I doubt Beth does.

Me, too.  Poor Robin.  :roll: I hope Dave isn't buying into the BS but rather listening closely. Robin may be a little too trusting.  Especially when it comes to the skank and her friends.   


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 03, 2007, 08:12:47 AM
Morning all!

I have never followed other sites, so I'm really green when it comes to this, so I'll just ask: Does Robin not know that Julia posts horrible stuff about Beth and about Natalee as well? I have never said a negative word about anyone in Natalee's family, and I'm not about to start now, regardless of the answer to my question, but I'd like to understand. Obviously I'm missing something.


Title: Good Morning Monkeys
Post by: Leslie on December 03, 2007, 08:24:25 AM
Diario
http://www.diarioaruba.com/
Amigoe
http://www.amigoe.com/english/
BonDia
http://www.cspnv.com/
Solo di Pueblo
http://www.solodipueblo.com/
Aruba Today
http://www.arubatoday.com/
24ora
http://www.24ora.com/
Translator:
http://papiamentu.donamaro.nl

We have a snow storm going on here.   It's going to be a long winter. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: blah on December 03, 2007, 08:28:05 AM
Is Aruba actually an hour ahead of Eastern Time zone right now?

8:30 here right now, so its 9:30 there, right?


Title: Re: Good Morning Monkeys
Post by: San on December 03, 2007, 08:30:13 AM
Diario
http://www.diarioaruba.com/
Amigoe
http://www.amigoe.com/english/
BonDia
http://www.cspnv.com/
Solo di Pueblo
http://www.solodipueblo.com/
Aruba Today
http://www.arubatoday.com/
24ora
http://www.24ora.com/
Translator:
http://papiamentu.donamaro.nl

We have a snow storm going on here.   It's going to be a long winter. 


We had a little snow here yesterday and it caused a lot of confusion.  If this is a sample of how it's going to be I agree with you that it's a long winter.

Good Morning Everyone.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: San on December 03, 2007, 08:30:49 AM
Is Aruba actually an hour ahead of Eastern Time zone right now?

8:30 here right now, so its 9:30 there, right?

Correct.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 03, 2007, 08:50:14 AM
Posted by Lazlo at RU (makes sense):

Lazlo Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2007 12:06 am   

They probably wanted to question Beth about all the claims made recently by a source called "Trina".

Gielen made it to the newspapers to have "Trina" on tape claming Jug told her Natalee just got out of rehab, and Natalee using her creditcard twice after she disappeared.

They cannot and would not want to ignore this, even the "FBI hearings" made it to the Dutch Parliament even though it was just an internet initiative.

If they go to trial they cannot have "Trina" appearing as a witness making all sort of claims, so they probably confronted Beth with that and whatever else and may have asked her to provide material, to not have any surpises if this goes to trial, IMO 



IMO Trina is the WACKJOB @ BFN who goes by the name 'Observera' ...she is obsessed with her own story of some envelope Beth and Jug received at the Alto Vista Chapel. Trina was the Taxi driver. I think. She is a real flake.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: MuffyBee on December 03, 2007, 08:52:46 AM
Posted by Lazlo at RU (makes sense):

Lazlo Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2007 12:06 am   

They probably wanted to question Beth about all the claims made recently by a source called "Trina".

Gielen made it to the newspapers to have "Trina" on tape claming Jug told her Natalee just got out of rehab, and Natalee using her creditcard twice after she disappeared.

They cannot and would not want to ignore this, even the "FBI hearings" made it to the Dutch Parliament even though it was just an internet initiative.

If they go to trial they cannot have "Trina" appearing as a witness making all sort of claims, so they probably confronted Beth with that and whatever else and may have asked her to provide material, to not have any surpises if this goes to trial, IMO 



IMO Trina is the WACKJOB @ BFN who goes by the name 'Observera' ...she is obsessed with her own story of some envelope Beth and Jug received at the Alto Vista Chapel. Trina was the Taxi driver. I think. She is a real flake.


 :smt017  I wonder what that would  be? 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: nonesuche on December 03, 2007, 09:02:54 AM
Posted by Lazlo at RU (makes sense):

Lazlo Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2007 12:06 am   

They probably wanted to question Beth about all the claims made recently by a source called "Trina".

Gielen made it to the newspapers to have "Trina" on tape claming Jug told her Natalee just got out of rehab, and Natalee using her creditcard twice after she disappeared.

They cannot and would not want to ignore this, even the "FBI hearings" made it to the Dutch Parliament even though it was just an internet initiative.

If they go to trial they cannot have "Trina" appearing as a witness making all sort of claims, so they probably confronted Beth with that and whatever else and may have asked her to provide material, to not have any surpises if this goes to trial, IMO 



IMO Trina is the WACKJOB @ BFN who goes by the name 'Observera' ...she is obsessed with her own story of some envelope Beth and Jug received at the Alto Vista Chapel. Trina was the Taxi driver. I think. She is a real flake.


 :smt017  I wonder what that would  be? 


There are so many whackjobs on Aruba it would be hard to figure which one is saying what outlandish slam against Natalee on any given day - one thing I am sure of however, it's not the typical Aruban native making these slams but rather those attached in dark corners to Renho, Purcell, perhaps even reality and let's not forget Anita and MF or Charles Croes.

CBB - yes Robin is aware, she's posted at RU herself and you couldn't miss the trashing of Beth particularly if she had even tried to, or Natalee or Jug. It appears if someone is nice to Robin then that's the only requirement for her allegiance? Like you I'd prefer not to post further about it, I don't think this will ever make sense to some of us.

San how much snow did ya get?



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Anna on December 03, 2007, 09:08:12 AM
Posted by Lazlo at RU (makes sense):

Lazlo Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2007 12:06 am   

They probably wanted to question Beth about all the claims made recently by a source called "Trina".

Gielen made it to the newspapers to have "Trina" on tape claiming Jug told her Natalee just got out of rehab, and Natalee using her creditcard twice after she disappeared.

They cannot and would not want to ignore this, even the "FBI hearings" made it to the Dutch Parliament even though it was just an internet initiative.

If they go to trial they cannot have "Trina" appearing as a witness making all sort of claims, so they probably confronted Beth with that and whatever else and may have asked her to provide material, to not have any surprises if this goes to trial, IMO 



IMO Trina is the WACKJOB @ BFN who goes by the name 'Observera' ...she is obsessed with her own story of some envelope Beth and Jug received at the Alto Vista Chapel. Trina was the Taxi driver. I think. She is a real flake.


 :smt017  I wonder what that would  be? 



Muffy,
It most likely never happened.  This person also claims to have overheard and been told directly by Jug and some Mitch that Natalee was recently in rehab so you can see that she is not at all reliable as Natalee has no time missing from her very busy schedule.  The Dorians is a highly competitive position to hold and one would lose it if not able and available to attend practices, etc. as it is much coveted for obvious reasons and the fun of it all, great costumes, etc.

Remember Beth clutched her journal everywhere she went and may not have felt comfortable leaving it in the taxi with this nutcase and the driver may have seen the journal only as they returned to the car and didn't notice as they existed.  It was dark of night.  So having a filthy mind that stays in the gutter as apparently all Arubans I have seen do, she made up the mystery envelope and that they were laughing.

They had likely been in the church praying, a concept this person had no knowledge or personal experience with.  Remember always our DOJ says one in five used Cocaine in Aruba.  Deduct the children and the elderly and think about that!  Boggles the mind and explains the constant auto accidents, however, as well as the stupidity.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Anna on December 03, 2007, 09:13:50 AM
Morning all!

I have never followed other sites, so I'm really green when it comes to this, so I'll just ask: Does Robin not know that Julia posts horrible stuff about Beth and about Natalee as well? I have never said a negative word about anyone in Natalee's family, and I'm not about to start now, regardless of the answer to my question, but I'd like to understand. Obviously I'm missing something.

Robin also shared lots of baby photos of Natalee, well real young child I guess you would call it with one of them.  One of the photos was used to make that awful lying poster claiming Natalee had FAS.  Hardly!  That would be Joran maybe.  Natalee was a very intelligent, well adjusted young lady.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: greeneyedlady on December 03, 2007, 09:14:35 AM
Morning all!

I have never followed other sites, so I'm really green when it comes to this, so I'll just ask: Does Robin not know that Julia posts horrible stuff about Beth and about Natalee as well? I have never said a negative word about anyone in Natalee's family, and I'm not about to start now, regardless of the answer to my question, but I'd like to understand. Obviously I'm missing something.

Good morning CBB, thanks again for the cool Christmas av...

I know Robin reads @ RU, and I don't see how she could miss the stories Julia/Glenda tells. Julia/Glenda has been proven to not be telling the truth over there, but she still goes on with her BS. Have to say tho, it seems like not as many posters are hanging on to her every word anymore. :D
I can't and won't say anything bad about Robin, bc I don't know her but @ RU there's been plenty of not so nice things written there about her and Dave also. Maybe she just doesn't see the evil in some of those poster's posts?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Peaches on December 03, 2007, 09:14:51 AM
KLAAS, I'M UPLOADING NOW.

Carpe, you ROCK!  Most of the time, I miss things when they air the first time because I'm sleeping.  I appreciate the heck outta the fact you snatch and post all the news appearances.  It's a great resource.  You are a hero monkey for all you do for Natalee.

Thank you.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Anna on December 03, 2007, 09:16:52 AM
So posting a bold-face lie is just as good as posting the truth?  How does this lead to finding out what happened to Natalee to post lies and slander?

I am missing something here but trying very hard to be accepting of people dealing with things in different ways.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Anna on December 03, 2007, 09:18:46 AM
Does anyone else find Kimberly on the LineUp (yes, that's a cop out on spelling her last name, haha) to be so much better informed on the details of the Holloway investigation than Greta who was actually THERE?

Wassup with that?

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Peaches on December 03, 2007, 09:19:52 AM
So posting a bold-face lie is just as good as posting the truth?  How does this lead to finding out what happened to Natalee to post lies and slander?

I am missing something here but trying very hard to be accepting of people dealing with things in different ways.



I hear ya, Anna.  I'd like to think there was a crafty ulterior motive behind Robin but I'm not convinced.  I think many people have way underestimated Dave.  Behind that soft spoken Southern gentleman, I think he's got a good handle on things.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: blah on December 03, 2007, 09:22:16 AM
So posting a bold-face lie is just as good as posting the truth?  How does this lead to finding out what happened to Natalee to post lies and slander?

I am missing something here but trying very hard to be accepting of people dealing with things in different ways.



I dont believe you.


Liar.






 :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Peaches on December 03, 2007, 09:24:18 AM
Does anyone else find Kimberly on the LineUp (yes, that's a cop out on spelling her last name, haha) to be so much better informed on the details of the Holloway investigation than Greta who was actually THERE?
Wassup with that?

She was formerly a prosecutor so I think she has a different perspective than defense attorney Greta.  I think Kimberly has this case figured out and has a good idea who was involved.  I like Kimberly alot.  She stands right up to blowhards like Joe.  She's similar to Nancy Grace that way.  I love smart women who don't take any crap. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: San on December 03, 2007, 09:25:57 AM
Does anyone else find Kimberly on the LineUp (yes, that's a cop out on spelling her last name, haha) to be so much better informed on the details of the Holloway investigation than Greta who was actually THERE?

Wassup with that?
.

Yes Anna she seems to be better informed and she refuses to let people spew their lies on her show and she confonts them.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 03, 2007, 09:33:35 AM
Thanks to everyone for answering me. I'm going to chalk that one up as one of life's mysteries, and let it go at that.

I agree about Kimberly. She seems much more on top of things and far more capable of cutting through the crap to get to the obvious.

Speaking of crap; Tacky said he was going to try to get Joran released today................wonder how that will go!?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Anna on December 03, 2007, 09:36:21 AM
My dear SB,
With all due respect to you and your position in life, there is not a heterosexual male alive who would recognize a catfight if he fell over it before it came to blows.  At least that has been my experience.  No, calling this a catfight is not what we are saying at all.  They are not fighting over Dave!  Beth has moved on in her life and is fully accepting of his current marriage I am sure.

The problem is that saying Dave came out of this meeting and then went directly to one with this person who has said such horrible things about Beth and Natalee was totally unnecessary.  It was not necessary to even mention these horrid people let alone endorse them.

They have said terrible things about most of us here as well, especially Klaasend because she is the General.  They once had a whole thread devoted to bashing just me, for example.  They quote almost everything Tyler posts and make fun of it.

So it offends me when someone says they are good people, should be consulted, etc.

It makes me wonder what am I doing here.  Then I have to remind myself that I am here for NATALEE and NATALEE only and for those like her MOTHER who are striving to find the truth of what happened to her.

But it is insulting to read that these people who have said these things are ones to be praised. 

It's far from a catfight, it's about the glowing terms with which people who have attacked so many of us, you included on occasion, Natalee and Beth.  We are concerned and puzzled and even hurt by it.   If these people are right, we are all blithering idiots and should shut up and go away.   Well, I'm sure that would make some very happy as they could more easily get on with their lives.

I hope we can just put this behind us and go forward but I did want to at least try to explain why this has hurt some of our feelings.

Now I will drop it.  We have more important things to deal with such as any motions filed today for the early release of Joran.


.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Anna on December 03, 2007, 09:45:58 AM
So posting a bold-face lie is just as good as posting the truth?  How does this lead to finding out what happened to Natalee to post lies and slander?

I am missing something here but trying very hard to be accepting of people dealing with things in different ways.



I dont believe you.


Liar.






 :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/thth475163.gif) 
(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/thththdancinggirl.gif)



Hey, wasn't Jossy looking for some of this?

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/30wseh1_th.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: sb on December 03, 2007, 09:53:57 AM
Anna, I haven't read a refugee site in a year or more, so I don't know what they are saying over there about you or Tyler or anyone else. I can figure that it's not nice.

I know that I would deal with people like mip6 and glenda MUCH differently than Dave and Robin have, but that's because I know what it looks like when people embrace you while hiding the knife that is about to be plunged into your back. Dave, being in the insurance business, by rights ought to know this too, for there is no more cutthroat profession around this side of law/politics.

What I was talking about last night had to do with some posters trying to tun the Robin thing into a clash between Robin and Beth. I KNOW you and Tyler and about 95% of the people in here would not sign on to that but there are some (who I think very highly of) who are doing that.

That is NOT what's at issue right now, we need to focus on this case and not on the depths of the dynamics of the relationships in this family.

And yes I agree, I generally wouldn't know what a girl catfight was unless actual blood was spilled right in front of me.  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Anna on December 03, 2007, 09:58:10 AM
I feel like I am bringing everybody down so for everybody (except Blah)

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Morning%20Aft%20Evening/th7ec40fb4.gif)

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Morning%20Aft%20Evening/ththCOFFEEPOT.gif)(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Morning%20Aft%20Evening/theggtooeasyvk6.gif)(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Morning%20Aft%20Evening/thfrtyur.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Anna on December 03, 2007, 10:01:59 AM
(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Morning%20Aft%20Evening/24pgqra_th.gif)


Joran's in jail!   :D



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: dennisintn on December 03, 2007, 10:03:54 AM
Posted by Lazlo at RU (makes sense):

Lazlo Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2007 12:06 am   

They probably wanted to question Beth about all the claims made recently by a source called "Trina".

Gielen made it to the newspapers to have "Trina" on tape claming Jug told her Natalee just got out of rehab, and Natalee using her creditcard twice after she disappeared.

They cannot and would not want to ignore this, even the "FBI hearings" made it to the Dutch Parliament even though it was just an internet initiative.

If they go to trial they cannot have "Trina" appearing as a witness making all sort of claims, so they probably confronted Beth with that and whatever else and may have asked her to provide material, to not have any surpises if this goes to trial, IMO 



IMO Trina is the WACKJOB @ BFN who goes by the name 'Observera' ...she is obsessed with her own story of some envelope Beth and Jug received at the Alto Vista Chapel. Trina was the Taxi driver. I think. She is a real flake.

better know in polite circles as observadummy.  those of us who aren't particularly polite have more appropriate names.
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Anna on December 03, 2007, 10:05:35 AM
Yes, SB,

You are right.  I think this is our best and maybe only shot at justice.  Very important to stay focused on the right things especially now.  Good to see you posting with the early morning monkeys but I do miss the Late Nite Crew and Spooky turning off the lights and all we used to discuss then as well.



Did anyone else find Tito's remark that Beth did not look happy coming out of the meeting totally inappropriate?  She should look happy coming out of a meeting where she was likely told her child was dead for a fact.

Those people have "happy" on the brain!  I thought that was just plain foolish for him to say.  Who would look happy about something like that?  Wishful thinking on his part or else he relishes Beth's misery. 

MO

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: sb on December 03, 2007, 10:06:18 AM
Anna you aren't bringing anyone down! You are a big asset to this case.

I wish I had the time to do the research some of you do on all these other sites and I feel like I am missing out on a lot of info. You and several others keep us up to speed on all the garbage they are trying to pull.

I KNOW what those Refugees are. I regard info they spew out as being fatally flawed anyway, as fruit from a poison tree, so I wouldn't make overtures to them like Robin has done.

But we need to remember that we have PLENTY of suspicion about Greta and where she stands, yet Beth still cooperates with her. THAT is the one I find surprising.   


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: blah on December 03, 2007, 10:09:26 AM
I feel like I am bringing everybody down so for everybody (ESPECIALLY Blah!!!)

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Morning%20Aft%20Evening/th7ec40fb4.gif)

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Morning%20Aft%20Evening/ththCOFFEEPOT.gif)(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Morning%20Aft%20Evening/theggtooeasyvk6.gif)(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Morning%20Aft%20Evening/thfrtyur.jpg)

fixed.
 :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: igsigs on December 03, 2007, 10:09:27 AM
Speaking of crap; Tacky said he was going to try to get Joran released today................wonder how that will go!?

I don't think Taco understands the *system*.

I do know Mos intends to extend Joran's incarceration this week. Which will require the presentation of new evidence.

Which means...TeamSloot has not seen everything yet.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: sb on December 03, 2007, 10:10:23 AM
And now my Morning Monkey time is up... see y'all tonight!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Peaches on December 03, 2007, 10:14:23 AM
(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Morning%20Aft%20Evening/24pgqra_th.gif)


Joran's in jail!   :D



WOOHOOO!

It's a good day already!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: BUCKSHOT on December 03, 2007, 10:15:14 AM
so... what is next for this case?

joran hearing for additional 60 days.
kalpoes released and probably hanging very low.
TES to arrive later this week and begin search.
other suspects (paulus) on edge and sweating??

anyone heard any specifics about beth/dave meeting with MOS?
fox says they interviewed / interrogated them for about 5 hours.
we know they have both headed home from aruba.
any interviews or specifics given by either ??

has old regime (van derstraaten, jacobs) ruined the possibility of a decent prosecution lead by MOS ?

does everyone think that (a) prosecution will be successful in bringing the case to trial and convicting those guilty of crime(s) or (b) this is dog and pony show number two with a hidden agenda of screwing up this case to the point of no return.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2007, 10:15:23 AM
http://www.amigoe.com/english/

Brothers Kalpoe are outside again

(http://www.amigoe.com/english/images/11-01-Hans-Mos.jpg)

Chief public prosecutor Hans Mos indicated that the OM will appeal the decision of the examining magistrate to release the brothers Kalpoe from custody.

ORANJESTAD – The two fellow suspects of Joran van der Sloot (20), the brothers Deepak (24) and Satish (21) are again released from custody today.  The Public Prosecutor (OM) has requested an extension of the custody today, but the examining magistrate ruled against it.  The OM has meanwhile announced that she will appeal this decision.
The examining magistrate says that it’s true that the current dossier of the two suspects contains serious ‘objections’ against them, but not enough to keep them longer in custody.  Custody based on the current evidence is not allowed.  This evidence was the wiping out of traces of a crime scene and the spiriting away of a body, said a spokesperson of the OM.  The two brothers remain suspects of voluntary manslaughter or in any case, serious bodily harm that resulted in the death of Natalee Holloway.   
Van der Sloot’s mother is according to reports, very happy that the two brothers are outside again, but she doesn’t know what it would mean for her son.  Ten persons were arrested since the disappearance of Holloway, but nobody is officially charged yet.
Chief public prosecutor, Hans Mos finds it striking that the custody of the Kalpoe’s is not extended, while it is based on ‘almost’ the same dossier as that of Van der Sloot.  “Were his objections serious enough to extend his custody? It looks like he has a different role in the case.”

Joran van der Sloot’s custody was extended with eight days early this week.  An extension with 60 days will be considered late next week.  The objection that his lawyer Ariean de Bie has lodged against the restrictions imposed on Van der Sloot, is meanwhile dismissed by the Common Court of the Neth.Antilles and Aruba.  The restrictions were eased a little though since his arrest.  He received a bible and reading matters.  The request to receive visitors, like his mother, brother, a ‘different lawyer’ and friends, was dismissed.  He cannot have contact with other prisoners, he cannot watch TV, he cannot make telephone calls and write letters, and cannot read current reading material, like newspapers and magazines.  He is now allowed to sport under supervision.
 
BETH
In the meantime, the mother of Natalee Holloway, Beth Reynolds (Twitty) has arrived in Aruba.  She and her former husband, Dave Holloway have a meeting with the OM today.  Dave Holloway is also waiting for the arrival of a special investigation-boat to scan the seabed around Aruba again for possible traces of his daughter.  The boat is expected to arrive at the end of next week and allows him to search to a three-kilometer depth.  The former search action only reached a depth of 100 meters.   


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Peaches on December 03, 2007, 10:16:06 AM
Anna you aren't bringing anyone down! You are a big asset to this case.

I wish I had the time to do the research some of you do on all these other sites and I feel like I am missing out on a lot of info. You and several others keep us up to speed on all the garbage they are trying to pull.

I KNOW what those Refugees are. I regard info they spew out as being fatally flawed anyway, as fruit from a poison tree, so I wouldn't make overtures to them like Robin has done.

But we need to remember that we have PLENTY of suspicion about Greta and where she stands, yet Beth still cooperates with her. THAT is the one I find surprising.   

Beth has parlayed it into air time for Natalee's case.  I have no problem with that.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: BUCKSHOT on December 03, 2007, 10:21:39 AM
presenting new evidence for further incarceration seems strange to me.

it appears as though prosecutor shows judge a piece of paper with evidence and has the rest of the evidence blacked out. then, at the end of the 8 day period, he shows them the blacked out section to get 8 more days.  at the end of the second 8 day period, he pulls out yet another blacked out section to get their incarceration extended. seem backwards to me.

show them the evidence, and get it on. take them to trial already !!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Anna on December 03, 2007, 10:21:59 AM
Blah, you make me laugh, you are silly!   :D  How in the world can you edit MY post when I can't even do that???   :2doh:  Probably magic of some sort.   :shock: :cool: :lol:


I hope Joran is not released but gets the 60 day treatment.  Add to the 90 plus time he is in there now and we have about 5 months total that he has been in the slammer over this. 

Not saying that is nearly enough for what he has likely done but just saying it is a long time for a young person. . . . .

Other thoughts I am having this morning then I will hush and go to work. . . .

Does anyone else remember a while back Rob was posting some sort of maps of WATER around Aruba with little tacks here and there? 

Huuummmm. . . .

Also anyone who did not read the link Nuts44x4 posted on deep cold water preservation might want to do that.  Maybe she would even post the link again,  I did not save it and now wish I had.  It was excellent information.

While I don't think we should get our hopes up about anything and it is a gristly subject, there is a very, very remote possibility that a sort of mummification can take place of organs and such, common name of grave wax.  I had totally forgotten that there is such a phenomenon.

It should sure concern suspects far more than us, HA! 

Sometimes I just like to give them and their supporters something to think about.

.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Peaches on December 03, 2007, 10:26:16 AM
presenting new evidence for further incarceration seems strange to me.

it appears as though prosecutor shows judge a piece of paper with evidence and has the rest of the evidence blacked out. then, at the end of the 8 day period, he shows them the blacked out section to get 8 more days.  at the end of the second 8 day period, he pulls out yet another blacked out section to get their incarceration extended. seem backwards to me.

show them the evidence, and get it on. take them to trial already !!!

I agree, it's totally ridiculous to my way of thinking.  I guess I don't like their system.  Oh well.  I would rather see it all laid out and let the judge draw his conclusions from the total rather than this piecemeal way of looking at things.  Seems like it wastes a lot of time without accomplishing much either.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: igsigs on December 03, 2007, 10:26:42 AM
so... what is next for this case?

IMO > Sometime in the next week or two charges will be filed. Against Joran - voluntary manslaughter. Against the Kalpoes - destruction of evidence (at minimum).

How strong the case is or how the judges will rule...i cannot guess.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Maggie on December 03, 2007, 10:29:07 AM

Anna, SB,
The best explanation re: men thinking women are against each other is a quote from Olivia Joules.

Two Types of Women


Theory was that you can divide women into two types: those who were on the Girls’ Team, and Undercover Bitches.  If a woman was on the Girls’ Team, she could be as beautiful, intelligent, rich, famous, sexy, successful and as popular as f***, and you’d still like her. Women on the Girls’ Team had solidarity. They were conspiratorial and brought all their f***-ups to the table for everyone to enjoy. Undercover Bitches were competitive: they showed off, tried to put others down to make themselves look good, lacked humor and a sense of their own ridiculousness, said things which sounded okay on the surface but were actually designed to make you feel really bad, couldn’t bear it when they weren’t getting enough attention, and they flicked their hair. Men didn’t get all this. They thought women took against each other because they were jealous. Quite tragic, really.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Maggie on December 03, 2007, 10:31:25 AM

I thought MOS was not presenting everything he had because if he did so, through rules of Discovery, he had to present everything he had to the defense. No?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Anna on December 03, 2007, 10:35:16 AM
presenting new evidence for further incarceration seems strange to me.

it appears as though prosecutor shows judge a piece of paper with evidence and has the rest of the evidence blacked out. then, at the end of the 8 day period, he shows them the blacked out section to get 8 more days.  at the end of the second 8 day period, he pulls out yet another blacked out section to get their incarceration extended. seem backwards to me.

show them the evidence, and get it on. take them to trial already !!!

I agree, it's totally ridiculous to my way of thinking.  I guess I don't like their system.  Oh well.  I would rather see it all laid out and let the judge draw his conclusions from the total rather than this piecemeal way of looking at things.  Seems like it wastes a lot of time without accomplishing much either.



Had to chime in that I, too, find this convoluted and totally unnecessary.  Show enough the first time to hold them indefinitely???

I guess without a bail system, this is supposed to let people suspected of lesser crimes or who would be eligible for bail in our system out until charges are filed or they go to trial.

Or something.  Makes no sense.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 03, 2007, 10:35:18 AM
Ah, to be so popular that one has become the target of Refugees --- how refreshing to know I give the mentally challenged something constructive to do with their fingers.  Let them target me all they want.  It keeps them off Beth and Natalee for a while.  I have only read there 1-2 times.  It was difficult to read, crude, unintelligible except for what they had automated speech recognition transcribe and edit.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: igsigs on December 03, 2007, 10:36:16 AM
And if Renfro is back to sucking up to Natalee's family - we have come full circle.

Back on laundry duty i suppose. Go light on the starch this time Fro!  :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: msmarple on December 03, 2007, 10:38:17 AM

http://www.diario-aruba.com/2007/12/3/ (http://www.diario-aruba.com/2007/12/3/)

Quote
Beth Twitty interoga diasabra oranan largo…
RUMANNAN KALPOE A RECOBRA LIBERTAD DIASABRA ATARDI

 
Ministerio Publico ainda ta na tempo pa apela…

ORANJESTAD (AAN): DIARIO tabata presente na warda di San Nicolas y tambe na warda di polis na Shaba ora cu e dos rumannan Kalpoe a ser laga den libertad diasabra atardi.Un decision cu huez comisario staciona na Curacao a tuma despues cu no a mira mucho novedad den e evidencianan cu ministerio publico a usa pa bolbe gara e tres sospechosonan sera.

  Esaki abogadonan di e sospechosonan tambe a expresa durante entrevista cu nos tabata tin cu nan despues cu a pone man riba e tres sospechosonan.Tabata parce cu e team investigativo hunto cu expertonan Hulandes mas bien a shake up loke cu ya caba tabata tin y asina a pone man riba e tres sospechosonan cu bendicion di ministerio publico.

  Abogado Jose Figaroa a bay ten a warda di polis di Shaba pa busca su cliente mientras cu prome tabata abogado Elgin Zeppenfeld di bufete di abogadonan Kock y Wix cu a bay busca Deepak Kalpoe na San Nicolas.

   Na cas di famia Kalpoe tabata tin un cantidad grandi di prensa presente wardando nan yegada. Awor e abogado di Joran van der Sloot tambe ta pendiente pa e decision cu huez comisario lo bay tuma riba prolongacion di detencion di su cliente.

  Mientrastanto Beth Twitty mama di Natalee Holloway a yega Aruba y diasabra polis a bay buske na un hotel High Rise na Oranjestad caminda a bay cune warda di polis. Eynan el a ser interoga pa casi seis ora largo.

  E siman aki lo mira kico mas lo bay sosode relaciona cu detencion di Joran van der Sloot y si ministerio Publico lo apela awe ainda e decision di huez comisario di laga e prome dos sospechosonan den libertad.

Online Pap translation:

beth twitty interoga saturday oranan largo…
rumannan kalpoe owing to recobra freedom saturday nightfall
ministerio publico still is at time for apela…

oranjestad (aan): daily paper was present at keep of san nicolas y also at keep of police at shaba hour cu the two rumannan kalpoe owing to being let in freedom saturday nightfall.un decision cu huez comisario staciona at curacao did take after cu not owing to see mucho novedad in the evidencianan cu ministerio publico owing to using for go back grab the three sospechosonan close.

this abogadonan of the sospechosonan also owing to expresa during interview cu we was have cu they after cu owing to place hand on the three sospechosonan.tabata seems cu the team investigativo together cu expertonan dutch more bien owing to shake up thing cu already end was have y so owing to place hand on the three sospechosonan cu bendicion of ministerio publico.

advocate jose figaroa owing to bay ten owing to keep of police of shaba for busca his cliente while cu first was advocate elgin zeppenfeld of bufete of abogadonan kock y wix cu owing to bay busca deepak kalpoe at san nicolas.

at home of family kalpoe was have one cantidad big of prensa present wardando they arrival. now the advocate of joran van der sloot also is pendiente for her decision cu huez comisario will bay take on prolongacion of detencion of his cliente.

all the time beth twitty mother of natalee holloway owing to arrive aruba y saturday police owing to bay buske at one hotel high rise at oranjestad caminda owing to bay cune keep of police. eynan past owing to being interoga for casi six hour largo.

the week here will see kico more will bay sosode relaciona cu detencion of joran van der sloot y if ministerio publico will apela today still the decision of huez comisario of let the first two sospechosonan in freedom.

* * *




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Anna on December 03, 2007, 10:39:59 AM
Maggie,
Great funny post on us women!

That is my understanding as well.  I once heard Mos say he would not present all the evidence until trial.

I seriously don't think Joe T gets this part.  He seems to think the pages he has at present is all there is or else is just plain lying about thinking that.

The defense has not, in my opinion, seen all of it yet as Mos has not presented it nor will he do so until bringing charges or going to trial then I think and only then does he have to do so.

Defense lawyers lying when they pretend to have all the evidence.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Getagrip on December 03, 2007, 10:40:41 AM
igsigs - next week or two? That's very optimistic. I think it'll all depend, if Joran's detention is extended for 60 days, the decision of whether or not to prosecute will be delayed as close as possible to the arbitrary 12/31 date. If Joran is also set free, then we see the charges (if any) brought sooner.

This is the best-case scenario, as I see it. However, call me cynical, but I don't expect best case scenarios out of Aruba.

The following is from today's Diario:

12.03.2007
Beth Twitty question for several hours on Saturday
Kalpoe brothers set free Saturday afternoon
Public Ministry still has time to appeal
http://getagripmonkey.blogspot.com/2007/12/beth-twitty-question-for-several-hours.html
DIARIO Aruba
12/03/2007


ORANJESTAD (AAN): DIARIO was present at the San Nicolas and Shaba police stations when the two Kalpoe brothers were set free on Saturday afternoon. A decision that the judge-commissioner stationed in Curacao took after he didn’t see much new in the evidence the Public Ministry used to catch the three suspects again.

This is what the lawyers for the suspects also expressed during the interview they gave to us after they nabbed the three suspects. It seemed rather that the investigative team along with Dutch experts shook up what they already had and in so doing nabbed the three suspects with the approval of the Public Ministry.

Attorney Jose Figaroa went to the Shaba police station to pick up his client while at first it was attorney Elgin Zeppenfeld of the law firm Kock and Wix who went to pick up Deepak [Satish?] Kalpoe at San Nicolas.

At the Kalpoe family home there was a big quantity of media present awaiting their return. Now the attorney for Joran van der Sloot is also waiting on the decision the judge-commissioner will take on the prolongation of his client’s detention.

Meanwhile, Beth Twitty, the mother of Natalee Holloway, arrived in Aruba Saturday and police went to get her at a high rise hotel in Oranjestad and went with her to the police station. There she was questioned for six long hours.

This week will determine what will happen with the detention of Joran van der Sloot and if the Public Ministry will still appeal today the decision of the judge-commissioner that set the first two suspects free.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: casa on December 03, 2007, 10:44:47 AM
I'm a little behind here and did not get to log on to read last night as I have been out of town with a sick child.  I'm assuming that someone at RU is trying to make it look as if Beth and Robin are fighting, maybe over Dave.  If this is wrong I apologize but that is what I got without having to read back.  I used to read a lot at RU but not much anymore because it only made my blood pressure go up and made me literally sick.  SO much of what they post is trash and is totally untrue.  They make up stuff just because they have decided they don't like Beth.  I know for a fact that much of what Glenda/Julia has posted is bald faced lies.  I don't know Robin or Dave as I know the other side of the family.  I certainly hope that Robin is not reaching out to RU or if she is she has a good reason.  Even if she didn't like Beth I cannot imagine her wanting to talk to those people who have trashed Natalee as they have.  Again I apologize is I have read wrong, but even if I have please know that many of those people are sick sick.  I once mentioned to my 21 year of daughter how much it upset me to read the trash they write.  She in her young wisdom told me that God would take care of evil and I cling to this inregards to those who have taken away Natalee's life and given her family and friends so much grief.  I hope everyone has a good day and pray that today will bring some good news for all who support Natalee!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 03, 2007, 10:45:40 AM
Thanks a million, Geta.  I agree with you that it will be miraculous if anything good comes from Aruba, but we, like Peaches, are looking for a miracle.  God uses evil people for good, at times, and let's hope this is the time that He chooses to use them for good.  It might not be of their own doing, it could be something they are doing that is evil and He can turn that evil to good.  My hope and prayer is that he will, through Mos, who appears to be an honest prosecutor, bring forth at the time we want it, justice for Natalee and I want everyone to pray for Tim Miller and the guys and gals who are doing very dangerous and difficult work in order to assist in this miracle.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Slogger on December 03, 2007, 10:47:16 AM
And if Renfro is back to sucking up to Natalee's family - we have come full circle.

Back on laundry duty i suppose. Go light on the starch this time Fro!  :cool:

Igs, thanks for the humor.  That laundry duty was milked for more than a year.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: igsigs on December 03, 2007, 10:48:46 AM
Morning Grip!

Yes, optimistic. I am considering one scenerio where OM charges instead of revealing new *evidence* at a 60 day hearing. And another where Joran is simply not cooperating during interrogations...so why wait? Of course this all assumes that there is legitimite evidence.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: BUCKSHOT on December 03, 2007, 10:52:14 AM
does anyone here feel that the kalpoes were not present during the death of NH? and only guilty as stated of helping to dispose of the body? and ruin evidence?

just curious as to how everyone feels about that.....



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Peaches on December 03, 2007, 10:53:42 AM
Thanks a million, Geta.  I agree with you that it will be miraculous if anything good comes from Aruba, but we, like Peaches, are looking for a miracle.  God uses evil people for good, at times, and let's hope this is the time that He chooses to use them for good.  It might not be of their own doing, it could be something they are doing that is evil and He can turn that evil to good.  My hope and prayer is that he will, through Mos, who appears to be an honest prosecutor, bring forth at the time we want it, justice for Natalee and I want everyone to pray for Tim Miller and the guys and gals who are doing very dangerous and difficult work in order to assist in this miracle.

Amen to that, Tyler!  Casa, your daughter is very wise.  God will take care of evil.  Take it to the bank.

Patience is hard to come by some days.  Giving up is not an option. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Peaches on December 03, 2007, 10:55:02 AM
Morning Grip!

Yes, optimistic. I am considering one scenerio where OM charges instead of revealing new *evidence* at a 60 day hearing. And another where Joran is simply not cooperating during interrogations...so why wait? Of course this all assumes that there is legitimite evidence.

I like the second scenario.  I'd like to see that uncooperative attitude bite him right in the ass.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Peaches on December 03, 2007, 10:57:43 AM
does anyone here feel that the kalpoes were not present during the death of NH? and only guilty as stated of helping to dispose of the body? and ruin evidence?

just curious as to how everyone feels about that.....



Could be.  That would explain why they're not still in the pokey and the sporter is.  I think they are guilty of something, I'm just not entirely sure what all I think they're guilty of. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Getagrip on December 03, 2007, 10:58:33 AM
Thanks a million, Geta.  I agree with you that it will be miraculous if anything good comes from Aruba, but we, like Peaches, are looking for a miracle.  God uses evil people for good, at times, and let's hope this is the time that He chooses to use them for good.  It might not be of their own doing, it could be something they are doing that is evil and He can turn that evil to good.  My hope and prayer is that he will, through Mos, who appears to be an honest prosecutor, bring forth at the time we want it, justice for Natalee and I want everyone to pray for Tim Miller and the guys and gals who are doing very dangerous and difficult work in order to assist in this miracle.

I'm all for miracles :) I really want to remain optimistic, but I suppose it's a self-defense mechanism (or perhaps an extensive evaluation of their track record) to expect the worst and if anything else happens, then I won't be disappointed (again).

I think I'm going to latch on to igs's and your optimism and hang on for the ride.

I just wouldn't understand how they (Aruba in general and their justice system specifically) would put themselves through this if there wasn't any substance behind it. Because if this is smoke and mirrors all over again, it would really be the last nail on the Aruba coffin.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Slogger on December 03, 2007, 10:59:41 AM
Defense Playbook (MO):

Force the Prosecution's hand.  If Joran gets out, they bolster him, prevent confession, and fully inform Joran.

If Joran doesn't get out, more evidence is revealed.

Objective:  Get the show on the road, move quickly in and out of Court....before a body is found.

'Cause otherwise, it could mean cooked goose for Christmas.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 03, 2007, 10:59:54 AM
presenting new evidence for further incarceration seems strange to me.

it appears as though prosecutor shows judge a piece of paper with evidence and has the rest of the evidence blacked out. then, at the end of the 8 day period, he shows them the blacked out section to get 8 more days.  at the end of the second 8 day period, he pulls out yet another blacked out section to get their incarceration extended. seem backwards to me.

show them the evidence, and get it on. take them to trial already !!!


That is exactly what I said the other day. This 'little here, little there does nothing to move this case along and the end result will be all three walking.
I do not understand their system  :roll: and I bet Nancy Grace (as busy as she may be at home right now) is wondering the same thing!!! JUST DO IT!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 03, 2007, 11:02:27 AM
Ah, to be so popular that one has become the target of Refugees --- how refreshing to know I give the mentally challenged something constructive to do with their fingers.  Let them target me all they want.  It keeps them off Beth and Natalee for a while.  I have only read there 1-2 times.  It was difficult to read, crude, unintelligible except for what they had automated speech recognition transcribe and edit.


Not to mention all the disgusting photoshopped photos of Beth, Natalee and Dave. Oh yeah...real nice people over there at RU  :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 03, 2007, 11:06:20 AM
I understand why JQK is keeping a low profile and advising Beth to do the same.  However, what gores my ox, sotaspeak, is Greta's collusion with Joe Tacopino, and it can be nothing more.  I see her frustration in not being able to have Beth and/or Dave and JQK on her program, but she continues to alienate not only her viewers but the prosecution side more and more.  I read at various websites, some of which have nothing to do with current events, but gardening, decorating, politics, and it seems more and more people are questioning Greta's intentions here and some have tuned her out.  When I go to other websites, I never mention that I have any interest in the case and never voice my opinion as I do not want to "poison" the spokespeople by injecting my opinion or interjecting just to see what the temperature is there from the average person.  I have found that people who once were Fox viewers exclusively are turning against Fox for Greta's defense of Joran and her outright hostility toward any other opinion save his innocence.  Many, like myself, feel the Kalpoes were involved only peripherally and that Greta is trying to help put the yoke around their necks.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: igsigs on December 03, 2007, 11:11:12 AM
Defense Playbook (MO):

Force the Prosecution's hand.  If Joran gets out, they bolster him, prevent confession, and fully inform Joran.

If Joran doesn't get out, more evidence is revealed.

Objective:  Get the show on the road, move quickly in and out of Court....before a body is found.

'Cause otherwise, it could mean cooked goose for Christmas.

Yep


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: robots on December 03, 2007, 11:11:59 AM
I understand why JQK is keeping a low profile and advising Beth to do the same.  However, what gores my ox, sotaspeak, is Greta's collusion with Joe Tacopino, and it can be nothing more.  I see her frustration in not being able to have Beth and/or Dave and JQK on her program, but she continues to alienate not only her viewers but the prosecution side more and more.  I read at various websites, some of which have nothing to do with current events, but gardening, decorating, politics, and it seems more and more people are questioning Greta's intentions here and some have tuned her out.  When I go to other websites, I never mention that I have any interest in the case and never voice my opinion as I do not want to "poison" the spokespeople by injecting my opinion or interjecting just to see what the temperature is there from the average person.  I have found that people who once were Fox viewers exclusively are turning against Fox for Greta's defense of Joran and her outright hostility toward any other opinion save his innocence.  Many, like myself, feel the Kalpoes were involved only peripherally and that Greta is trying to help put the yoke around their necks.

BINGO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: LilPuma on December 03, 2007, 11:14:24 AM
Maggie,
Great funny post on us women!

That is my understanding as well.  I once heard Mos say he would not present all the evidence until trial.

I seriously don't think Joe T gets this part.  He seems to think the pages he has at present is all there is or else is just plain lying about thinking that.

The defense has not, in my opinion, seen all of it yet as Mos has not presented it nor will he do so until bringing charges or going to trial then I think and only then does he have to do so.

Defense lawyers lying when they pretend to have all the evidence.

Joe T gets it all right.  He just doesn't want the public watching Fox News to understand it.  It's what he's being paid for.  I am certainly hoping the Prosecutor has more evidence.  As I understand "their system", they are using what evidence they have to get more info from J2K, which is why they wanted more time to chat with them.  So Mos may have more info, but not enough to go to trial; at least that's how it seems to me.  


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: San on December 03, 2007, 11:16:26 AM
does anyone here feel that the kalpoes were not present during the death of NH? and only guilty as stated of helping to dispose of the body? and ruin evidence?

just curious as to how everyone feels about that.....



No I feel they were present.  They saw what happened and who did it.

The prosecution is trying to make it look like they were not there to avoid other charges against them.  But they forgot about Kidnapping and Rape.  JMO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Slogger on December 03, 2007, 11:20:10 AM
Defense Playbook (MO):

Force the Prosecution's hand.  If Joran gets out, they bolster him, prevent confession, and fully inform Joran.

If Joran doesn't get out, more evidence is revealed.

Objective:  Get the show on the road, move quickly in and out of Court....before a body is found.

'Cause otherwise, it could mean cooked goose for Christmas.

Yep

(More) Defense Playbook:

Joe will slip onto the island.  His job is to apply grease to the shafts planned for the Prosecution.

Who is one step ahead?  We don't know but it's nerve rattling.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: BUCKSHOT on December 03, 2007, 11:21:25 AM
does anyone here feel that the kalpoes were not present during the death of NH? and only guilty as stated of helping to dispose of the body? and ruin evidence?

just curious as to how everyone feels about that.....



No I feel they were present.  They saw what happened and who did it.

The prosecution is trying to make it look like they were not there to avoid other charges against them.  But they forgot about Kidnapping and Rape.  JMO

i kind of feel the same way - at least one of them were there when things went down.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: MumInOhio on December 03, 2007, 11:22:46 AM
does anyone here feel that the kalpoes were not present during the death of NH? and only guilty as stated of helping to dispose of the body? and ruin evidence?

just curious as to how everyone feels about that.....



I believe that Deepak was there at that time and maybe others and Satish was sent home as the computer alibi. Hence 'how's the girl'. The 20 times before leads me to believe that Joran was not alone. Joran alone would have had no reason to drug Natalee.This was a group thing. I am concerned that there are 800 million reasons to distance the Kalpoes from Natalee's demise.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: San on December 03, 2007, 11:24:09 AM
does anyone here feel that the kalpoes were not present during the death of NH? and only guilty as stated of helping to dispose of the body? and ruin evidence?

just curious as to how everyone feels about that.....



No I feel they were present.  They saw what happened and who did it.

The prosecution is trying to make it look like they were not there to avoid other charges against them.  But they forgot about Kidnapping and Rape.  JMO

No one takes the risk of drugging and kidnapping of an American Girl just to drop her off at a physcho friends home.  Unless the Kalpoes were truly Joran's slaves.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: BUCKSHOT on December 03, 2007, 11:25:03 AM
Defense Playbook (MO):

Force the Prosecution's hand.  If Joran gets out, they bolster him, prevent confession, and fully inform Joran.

If Joran doesn't get out, more evidence is revealed.

Objective:  Get the show on the road, move quickly in and out of Court....before a body is found.

'Cause otherwise, it could mean cooked goose for Christmas.

Yep

(More) Defense Playbook:

Joe will slip onto the island.  His job is to apply grease to the shafts planned for the Prosecution.

Who is one step ahead?  We don't know but it's nerve rattling.

if joran is released later this week, you will see nothing but his defense team on the airways and spin will be in full force (downplaying evidence, criticizing the original investigation - [which is ironic, because the perpetrators, more than likely, are happy that the investigative team of 2005 screwed it up so bad for them], pumping joran up as such a good, innocent young man)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 03, 2007, 11:27:49 AM
Let me add one thing:

I see no difference at all between how Robin deals with glenda, and how Beth deals with Greta.

Both are holding their noses and putting up with the smell in the hope they may get some help.

sb ... I respectfully disagree.

In my opinion ... the "smell" coming from Greta's direction is fresh air with the aroma of roses compared with the "stench" coming from the direction of Mark and Julia.

Beth Holloway does use Greta for a platform to further her quest for answers but ... she openly challenges Greta.  Robin Holloway openly upholds Mark and Julia and others with an Aruban agenda.

The following are Beth's challenging words to Greta in response to the Greta/Joran interview.  Beth does not argue ... she is respectful ... she takes the high road but ... she takes does take the opportunity to publicly expose the truth ... the truth that Greta was attempting coverup in her words that will be forever etched in the memories of Monkeys ... "I AM INCLINED TO BELIEVE HIM".

Janet

+++++++++++++++


Beth Twitty
On the Record w/ Greta
March 21, 2006


VAN SUSTEREN: Now, you and I have spent an awful lot of time together, talked together. You know my entire staff. Was it difficult for you that we sat down with him?

TWITTY: Oh, no. No, I mean, I think that any time that we can get Joran speaking, I think that he only incriminates himself every time. And you know, I've heard his offer that he is willing to sit down with myself or with Dave or the family, and absolutely, I would do it. I would go to Holland. I'd meet him wherever he would choose to. But you know, Greta, I would have to have one polygraph expert with me because, you know, just having Joran talk without any type of repercussions — I mean, I think those days are over for him. You know, I'd like to get to the bottom of where his lies are, and I think that a polygraph expert could help do that.  


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 03, 2007, 11:28:53 AM
does anyone here feel that the kalpoes were not present during the death of NH? and only guilty as stated of helping to dispose of the body? and ruin evidence?

just curious as to how everyone feels about that.....



I believe that Deepak was there at that time and maybe others and Satish was sent home as the computer alibi. Hence 'how's the girl'. The 20 times before leads me to believe that Joran was not alone. Joran alone would have had no reason to drug Natalee.This was a group thing. I am concerned that there are 800 million reasons to distance the Kalpoes from Natalee's demise.

Not meaning to be disagreeable with loyal Monkeys who have analyzed this from A to Izzer, but think back to some statements. 

Joran brought the Kalpoes.  He was supposed to bring 2 other people, both of whom had to work.  It was said that Natalee was seeking out 2 other girls to go out with the friends Joran may have brought.  This may all very well be true and in view of the fact that she could not find 2 other girls, Joran volunteered that they would take her back to the HI, since the night was going to be a "bust" and she could not find any girls to accompany them as "dates" for the K2.  So, I think she thought she was being chaperoned back to the HI by the 3, since the night had seemed to fall on its face.  However, they had other intentions and it is perhaps correct to assume that K2 dropped Natalee and Joran off someplace, perhaps his house, to pick up a vehicle so they went elsewhere.  K2 went home.  Joran, at some point, raped Natalee and took actions which led to her death.  At which point he needed help, he called on K2 and his father.  His father and he recruited K2 and others to dispose of Natalee's body, maybe it was just the acquisition of lobster traps or perhaps in assisting Steve Croes.  I believe it was at this point Paulus went to the bank to get the money to pay off the bifrons, whether it was Steve Croes, K2 and/or others, maybe the owner of the boat, or gas for the boat.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: NYC_lover on December 03, 2007, 11:30:30 AM
(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/thththdancinggirl.gif)


It look like on a salsa-dance  :wink:   :D


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: NYC_lover on December 03, 2007, 11:33:01 AM
(http://i140.photobucket.com/albums/r33/keltje/RedRoseGoodMorning.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Slogger on December 03, 2007, 11:33:36 AM
Defense Playbook (MO):

Force the Prosecution's hand.  If Joran gets out, they bolster him, prevent confession, and fully inform Joran.

If Joran doesn't get out, more evidence is revealed.

Objective:  Get the show on the road, move quickly in and out of Court....before a body is found.

'Cause otherwise, it could mean cooked goose for Christmas.

Yep

(More) Defense Playbook:

Joe will slip onto the island.  His job is to apply grease to the shafts planned for the Prosecution.

Who is one step ahead?  We don't know but it's nerve rattling.

if joran is released later this week, you will see nothing but his defense team on the airways and spin will be in full force (downplaying evidence, criticizing the original investigation - [which is ironic, because the perpetrators, more than likely, are happy that the investigative team of 2005 screwed it up so bad for them], pumping joran up as such a good, innocent young man)


Yes,  "if" that happens, it will be very hard to watch.  There will be such gagging, and we'll all need Pepto.  I'm not looking forward to the possibility, but.....

The end result is what counts.  Finding Natalee and bringing her home...counts.  We don't know what the Prosecution is doing, but...neither does the defense.  There is some comfort in that!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: JusticeforNatalee on December 03, 2007, 11:34:54 AM
Tylergal: You might want to contact Greta's bosses and register a complaint.

Slogger/Igsigs: That thought crossed my mind also--the defense's strategy of trying to force the prosecution's "hand."


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: BUCKSHOT on December 03, 2007, 11:35:02 AM
does anyone here feel that the kalpoes were not present during the death of NH? and only guilty as stated of helping to dispose of the body? and ruin evidence?

just curious as to how everyone feels about that.....



I believe that Deepak was there at that time and maybe others and Satish was sent home as the computer alibi. Hence 'how's the girl'. The 20 times before leads me to believe that Joran was not alone. Joran alone would have had no reason to drug Natalee.This was a group thing. I am concerned that there are 800 million reasons to distance the Kalpoes from Natalee's demise.

Not meaning to be disagreeable with loyal Monkeys who have analyzed this from A to Izzer, but think back to some statements. 

Joran brought the Kalpoes.  He was supposed to bring 2 other people, both of whom had to work.  It was said that Natalee was seeking out 2 other girls to go out with the friends Joran may have brought.  This may all very well be true and in view of the fact that she could not find 2 other girls, Joran volunteered that they would take her back to the HI, since the night was going to be a "bust" and she could not find any girls to accompany them as "dates" for the K2.  So, I think she thought she was being chaperoned back to the HI by the 3, since the night had seemed to fall on its face.  However, they had other intentions and it is perhaps correct to assume that K2 dropped Natalee and Joran off someplace, perhaps his house, to pick up a vehicle so they went elsewhere.  K2 went home.  Joran, at some point, raped Natalee and took actions which led to her death.  At which point he needed help, he called on K2 and his father.  His father and he recruited K2 and others to dispose of Natalee's body, maybe it was just the acquisition of lobster traps or perhaps in assisting Steve Croes.  I believe it was at this point Paulus went to the bank to get the money to pay off the bifrons, whether it was Steve Croes, K2 and/or others, maybe the owner of the boat, or gas for the boat.

this could be true.

a strong connection ties the kalpoes to joran. no one seems to be able to figure it.
if such a strong connection did not exist, i feel the kalpoes would have flipped on the vandersloot family a long time ago.

another thought - how will the ruling that they(k2) are not involved in her death directly play into the lawsuit currently in the state of california? will this aruban ruling work in their favor, work against them, or have no effect?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 03, 2007, 11:36:54 AM
Tylergal: You might want to contact Greta's bosses and register a complaint.

Slogger/Igsigs: That thought crossed my mind also--the defense's strategy of trying to force the prosecution's "hand."

In another life, a long time ago, I met :silent: Brit Hume, and I have written to him. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Sue on December 03, 2007, 11:38:51 AM
 sure hope they are interrogating the hell out of him while they got him


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Anna on December 03, 2007, 11:38:57 AM
Tyler,

Good analysis of several possibilities.  As usual, I agree with you.  I don't think the Kalpoes were involved in directly causing Natalee's death.  They either dropped off J and Natalee or only Deepak was present but did not physically cause her death.

That concealment of a corpse should cook their goose as far as innocence goes and as for the Dr Phil suit of claims for damage to their less than stellar reputations.  IMO.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Peaches on December 03, 2007, 11:40:50 AM
Tyler,

Good analysis of several possibilities.  As usual, I agree with you.  I don't think the Kalpoes were involved in directly causing Natalee's death.  They either dropped off J and Natalee or only Deepak was present but did not physically cause her death.

That concealment of a corpse should cook their goose as far as innocence goes and as for the Dr Phil suit of claims for damage to their less than stellar reputations.  IMO.

Can't argue with ya either, Tyler.  It sounds like you're suggesting that two different boys would have been involved that nite but their work schedule, thus the Kalpoes?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Slogger on December 03, 2007, 11:41:45 AM
Tylergal: You might want to contact Greta's bosses and register a complaint.

Slogger/Igsigs: That thought crossed my mind also--the defense's strategy of trying to force the prosecution's "hand."

I'm glad you said that.  This has been a strategy contest from the beginning.  We didn't realize it and got a late start.

mo


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: igsigs on December 03, 2007, 11:49:14 AM
Hope they have star-witness Freddy tucked away in a safe place.

He's no good with his hands in his pockets.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 03, 2007, 11:50:18 AM
Let's rewind back to the time when Anita was on TV, 2005, and was tongue-in-cheek denigrating the Kalpoes, stating that Joran had only known them a little while, she was on one occasion lecturing them on their behavior and giving them her expectations of them.

Let's fast forward a bit to April 2006, when they have suddenly become very good boys and she even has Nidra agreeing with her.  She had discovered over time, that they were not going to be able to pin this on the Kalpoes; she knew at this point, her son and her husband were the main culprits in this, and she had to tone down her attitude toward K2 in order to keep their cooperation and he is publicly telling them that if they keep quiet about what has happened, then she will continue to befriend them, perhaps via Paulus, who must have at some point, befriended the Kalpoes in dealing with the "car" and the "choller" which they allude to in their back-seat police van conversation.

Remember that Jaime has stated that Joran called him and asked him to accompany him that night because he had met some girls.  He was right there at the casino with Guido, so perhaps he had pointed Guido out to one of the girls there that this would be one of the guys who he would bring with him.  Failing at getting Jaime and Guido to go out with them, he fell back on the Karpool boys (his slaves) to drive him, thinking that whomever Natalee had talked to regarding getting a six-some or a three-some together, would go along with the Kalpoes.  Having seen this was not Guido and the other guy Joran had promised, the other 2 girls balked, so Joran tells Natalee, it's okay, that not much is going on Sunday nights and he needs to get home and study anyway, and that he and the K2 boys will take her back to the HI, but that was just a ruse to get her in the car.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Port Valerie on December 03, 2007, 11:51:15 AM
Not meaning to be disagreeable with loyal Monkeys who have analyzed this from A to Izzer, but think back to some statements. 

Joran brought the Kalpoes.  He was supposed to bring 2 other people, both of whom had to work.  It was said that Natalee was seeking out 2 other girls to go out with the friends Joran may have brought.  This may all very well be true and in view of the fact that she could not find 2 other girls, Joran volunteered that they would take her back to the HI, since the night was going to be a "bust" and she could not find any girls to accompany them as "dates" for the K2.  So, I think she thought she was being chaperoned back to the HI by the 3, since the night had seemed to fall on its face.  However, they had other intentions and it is perhaps correct to assume that K2 dropped Natalee and Joran off someplace, perhaps his house, to pick up a vehicle so they went elsewhere.  K2 went home.  Joran, at some point, raped Natalee and took actions which led to her death.  At which point he needed help, he called on K2 and his father.  His father and he recruited K2 and others to dispose of Natalee's body, maybe it was just the acquisition of lobster traps or perhaps in assisting Steve Croes.  I believe it was at this point Paulus went to the bank to get the money to pay off the bifrons, whether it was Steve Croes, K2 and/or others, maybe the owner of the boat, or gas for the boat.

I have never felt that the Kalpoes went to C&C to pick up girls. They are too unattractive to appeal to blond American girls from Alabama, and in all the pictures we've seen they hang out with a much tougher type of girl. Rather, I think they went to C&C to sell drugs to the Americans who were going home the next day. That's what THEY had done twenty times before and it always worked.

I think Joran went to C&C in the hopes of getting a girl or having a good time or just doing something interesting on a Sunday night. He was the entry point, giving the Kalpoes access to this American group.

Joran and the Kalpoes had two different interests but they benefitted each other -- Kalpoes had the car that Joran needed and Joran had the access to the American group that the Kalpoes needed.

It was just an ordinary night.









Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 03, 2007, 11:55:51 AM
does anyone here feel that the kalpoes were not present during the death of NH? and only guilty as stated of helping to dispose of the body? and ruin evidence?

just curious as to how everyone feels about that.....



No I feel they were present.  They saw what happened and who did it.

The prosecution is trying to make it look like they were not there to avoid other charges against them.  But they forgot about Kidnapping and Rape.  JMO

Good Morning Monks!!  San I agree......


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 03, 2007, 11:57:32 AM


if joran is released later this week, you will see nothing but his defense team on the airways and spin will be in full force (downplaying evidence, criticizing the original investigation - [which is ironic, because the perpetrators, more than likely, are happy that the investigative team of 2005 screwed it up so bad for them], pumping joran up as such a good, innocent young man)

If that happens I have vowed I will NOT watch TV.......I might bust a gasket for certain!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 03, 2007, 11:58:59 AM
does anyone here feel that the kalpoes were not present during the death of NH? and only guilty as stated of helping to dispose of the body? and ruin evidence?

just curious as to how everyone feels about that.....



No I feel they were present.  They saw what happened and who did it.

The prosecution is trying to make it look like they were not there to avoid other charges against them.  But they forgot about Kidnapping and Rape.  JMO

San ... I agree.

The scenario has been played out before and ... Joran, Deepak, Satish and Freddie each had a role ... a staring role.

Janet

+++++++++++++++++

Diana Emerencia - Freddy's Attorney
Decatur Daily News
August 31, 2005


Freddy Alexander Zedan-Arambatzis, a friend of van der Sloot and the Kalpoes, was arrested on suspicion of having unspecified "physical contact" with a female minor, said his lawyer, Diana Emerencia.

Zedan-Arambatzis, 21, is also suspected of photographing the girl in "tempting poses" and showing the images to other people, Emerencia said.  

The Kalpoe brothers and van der Sloot are also suspected of involvement in the incident, which allegedly occurred before Holloway disappeared, she said.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 03, 2007, 11:59:12 AM
(http://i140.photobucket.com/albums/r33/keltje/RedRoseGoodMorning.jpg)

Good Morning NYC...that is beautiful!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Slogger on December 03, 2007, 12:00:08 PM
Hope they have star-witness Freddy tucked away in a safe place.

He's no good with his hands in his pockets.


Agreed.  One wonders about about the suicide by hanging--first the rope was too short, second the rope was too long.  The next one might be suicide by hanging...without a rope.

There is gullibility in believing anything you say...will be believed by others.  (Ted Williams said it well,  "Stuck. . .")


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 03, 2007, 12:06:42 PM
sure hope they are interrogating the hell out of him while they got him


He isn't speaking....it must be a one way conversation.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: AZLady on December 03, 2007, 12:07:06 PM
Morning, Monkeys.  I've been reading the comments.  I keep remembering the incident at the Internet Cafe where Beth confronted Deepak.  She asked Deepak if he helped Natalee that night.  He hung his head and didn't look at her. 

Now, Beth knows much, much more of what happened that night.  When she confronted Deepak, it sounded to me like Beth knew Deepak was there when Natalee was assaulted, and she was asking him if he helped her.

From: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/08/09/earlyshow/main766023.shtml

Twitty described her close-up with Deepak to CBS News:

"There were customers on the computer and he was seated behind the cash register, and I guess he thought he was going to have a normal day at work.

"I wanted to ask him, Joran had admitted sexual assaults that he had committed against Natalee, and I wanted to ask Deepak: Did he participate, or did he try to help her?

"He couldn't answer me. He could only look down at the ground."

Beth goes on to say:
"I expected him, if he had no involvement, if he was not a participant in the sexual acts committed against my daughter, that yes, he could have come forward and said, 'No,' and looked me in the eye. He couldn't do that.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 03, 2007, 12:07:42 PM
I watched an hour-long program on XTC a few nights ago on Discovery, the LC or History Channel, cannot remember which, but I believe at the point Natalee was taken with them in the car, she had already been drugged, and perhaps was drugged a few hours before.  I think she may have been the target of drugs by the bartender, perhaps a call was made to the bartender to make her drink special. 

XTC lasts for about 6 hours.  The drugged person sees all around them as being loving and congenial and nothing is wrong with anyone and that everyone has all good intentions and was described as a 6-hour orgasm.  It makes a person dance for hours, they just want to keep dancing.  (What did we learn from statements?)  Natalee had dance all night.  She had even asked Joran to dance with her.  She had danced while several of her MB girlfriends were dancing.  So, if she was drugged from the get-go by the bartender, who obviously Joran knew well (where did he go when he left the HI?  Did he make a swing by C&C and show the bartender a picture of Natalee from a cell phone that either he or Paulus was using in the casino?) had already "fixed" Natalee's drink and had her "prepped" for Joran when he arrived.  (Mary was not a virgin when she went through the maze = she was drugged long before she got in the car). 

When a person is coming down from the drug, they can act very bizarre, they get very depressed, cry and often scream (She was acting bizarre).


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 03, 2007, 12:08:47 PM
Hey GL!  Contact Shango for me and tell him he needs to clarify his riddles...If he wants to set the record straight...now is the time.  Tell us,who is Dirty Hand?  Who were the ones that came back to help Joran...Shango says it was babylonians.  Who are the Babylonians?  Do you want us to keep guessing?  How stupid...just tell us!  Come on!  GL...get in touch with him...you know how to do this. The FP of SM is still open to all who dare to venture there. 

Hey Shango!  Riddle me this...come on, don't you want a challenge?

Did the music man provide escort to Calypso's domain?
Or was the sibling of a friend the transporters of the dead?

Does the singing card remain hidden,
Has the card that was played lost its power?

Flying birds may sing, but many still don't understand the song.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: NYC_lover on December 03, 2007, 12:13:06 PM
Good Morning NYC...that is beautiful!!
Yes I know, it's SunnyinTX, btw Good Morning! I just had search for a beautiful Good Morning avatar.  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: MumInOhio on December 03, 2007, 12:15:22 PM
Good Morning NYC_lover Thank you for reposting the info on Dop Kruimel the other day. I am sorry I misunderstood when you said that she looks like KJ!!!!

Tyler I can see what you're saying and it could be possible, but have always felt that Freddy and not just his camera were involved here. Maybe I am making this more complicated than it actually was, but I'm stuck on Freddy.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: BUCKSHOT on December 03, 2007, 12:21:25 PM
very optimistic thinking here, but.......

wouldn't the thought of deepak and satish coming completely clean, as to who was involved, throw a monkey wrench into things. crown winess(es) in exchange for a less harsh sentence and/or charges.

unlikely, but an interesting thought, huh ??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 03, 2007, 12:21:29 PM
Good Morning NYC_lover Thank you for reposting the info on Dop Kruimel the other day. I am sorry I misunderstood when you said that she looks like KJ!!!!

Tyler I can see what you're saying and it could be possible, but have always felt that Freddy and not just his camera were involved here. Maybe I am making this more complicated than it actually was, but I'm stuck on Freddy.

"Freddy knows the truth..."  Kalpoe seems to believe if Freddy talks, this will exonerate him and his brother.  So what does Freddy know?  Joran raped Natalee, perhaps so did Guido who she fought off but Freddy was the cameraman.  Does this also make Freddy culpable as K2 or did Freddy claim less guilt since he was only the cameraman.  How do we know that Freddy has not used all this already to get us to the point we are now.  I believe that Freddy has talked his way into a position of "crown witness" or the prosecutor is keeping him as the surprise at the end when needed, perhaps even a film.

I still believe that K2 was involved, but peripherally.

The Bifrons (Babylonians) who helped .... enter GVC.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: San on December 03, 2007, 12:23:01 PM
Morning, Monkeys.  I've been reading the comments.  I keep remembering the incident at the Internet Cafe where Beth confronted Deepak.  She asked Deepak if he helped Natalee that night.  He hung his head and didn't look at her. 

Now, Beth knows much, much more of what happened that night.  When she confronted Deepak, it sounded to me like Beth knew Deepak was there when Natalee was assaulted, and she was asking him if he helped her.

From: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/08/09/earlyshow/main766023.shtml

Twitty described her close-up with Deepak to CBS News:

"There were customers on the computer and he was seated behind the cash register, and I guess he thought he was going to have a normal day at work.

"I wanted to ask him, Joran had admitted sexual assaults that he had committed against Natalee, and I wanted to ask Deepak: Did he participate, or did he try to help her?

"He couldn't answer me. He could only look down at the ground."

Beth goes on to say:
"I expected him, if he had no involvement, if he was not a participant in the sexual acts committed against my daughter, that yes, he could have come forward and said, 'No,' and looked me in the eye. He couldn't do that.

This quote of Beth's says it all about the Kalpoes involvement.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: NYC_lover on December 03, 2007, 12:23:21 PM
Good Morning NYC_lover Thank you for reposting the info on Dop Kruimel the other day. I am sorry I misunderstood when you said that she looks like KJ!!!!

Tyler I can see what you're saying and it could be possible, but have always felt that Freddy and not just his camera were involved here. Maybe I am making this more complicated than it actually was, but I'm stuck on Freddy.

Good Morning MumInOhio - You are welcome. Ok no problem, about the misunderstood, but I can understand sometimes about the misunderstood, because my english is still not very well, I see many times American people used another sense constructions and I just understand that better, then I can bring itself, I am sorry for that.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on December 03, 2007, 12:23:31 PM
On Greta's Blog, part of her show tonight...

tonight we will get the latest in the Natalee Holloway story…there is disappointing news out of Aruba but nonetheless I want the inside story of what happened and I assume you do, too…and yes, we will have the inside story assuming all the promises made to us over the weekend are kept…

hmmmm, wonder what this is?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: AZLady on December 03, 2007, 12:23:52 PM
I watched an hour-long program on XTC a few nights ago on Discovery, the LC or History Channel, cannot remember which, but I believe at the point Natalee was taken with them in the car, she had already been drugged, and perhaps was drugged a few hours before.  I think she may have been the target of drugs by the bartender, perhaps a call was made to the bartender to make her drink special. 

XTC lasts for about 6 hours.  The drugged person sees all around them as being loving and congenial and nothing is wrong with anyone and that everyone has all good intentions and was described as a 6-hour orgasm.  It makes a person dance for hours, they just want to keep dancing.  (What did we learn from statements?)  Natalee had dance all night.  She had even asked Joran to dance with her.  She had danced while several of her MB girlfriends were dancing.  So, if she was drugged from the get-go by the bartender, who obviously Joran knew well (where did he go when he left the HI?  Did he make a swing by C&C and show the bartender a picture of Natalee from a cell phone that either he or Paulus was using in the casino?) had already "fixed" Natalee's drink and had her "prepped" for Joran when he arrived.  (Mary was not a virgin when she went through the maze = she was drugged long before she got in the car). 

When a person is coming down from the drug, they can act very bizarre, they get very depressed, cry and often scream (She was acting bizarre).

Hi Tyler.  I have to respectfully disagree.  Ecstasy, or MDMA, does not going to fit the description of the activities of that night.  First off, Natalee didn't arrive at C & C's until rather late, probably 10 PM or after.  This would only give her a maximum of 3 hours to dance.  We saw her in the casino, seated at the BJ table up until 9:30 or so.  For someone who loved to dance, as Natalee did, three hours of dancing would be fun, not an ecstasy-induced marathon. 

Joran bought her a shot of 151 rum right at closing time.  I have no doubt this was poured from the special bottle kept behind the bar for ladies.  For $20 or $25 a shot, the lady gets a GHB-laced shot.  Because the drink is intended to be taken in one shot, without time to taste it before pouring it down the throat, this is the ideal way to administer a date-rape drug.  Do you remember Joran saying Natalee told him she would take it in two drinks, not one?  She didn't like to take shots--too strong and nasty for a non-drinker--and I think she just managed about half of it.  The drug takes effect in 20-30 minutes, thus the need to give it just before closing so the rapist can get his target into his car soon after the administration of the drug and before the target passes out and becomes incoherent.  Remember, Natalee's friend said she wasn't talking much and her eyes looked heavy as she was leaving.  She was already becoming disoriented.  These are not symptoms of ecstacy, or MDMA, but of a stronger drug like GHB.

I believe Natalee took enough of the drug in her half shot that she was incapacitated but not enough to keep her unconscious.  She woke and fought with Joran and her other attackers, leading to her death by violence.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: AZLady on December 03, 2007, 12:25:23 PM
On Greta's Blog, part of her show tonight...

tonight we will get the latest in the Natalee Holloway story…there is disappointing news out of Aruba but nonetheless I want the inside story of what happened and I assume you do, too…and yes, we will have the inside story assuming all the promises made to us over the weekend are kept…

hmmmm, wonder what this is?

Probably Tacky Joe's promise to give to Greta the 15 pages the prosecutor gave the defense attorneys.  Anyone want to make a bet that he doesn't really have it and won't come through? :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: NYC_lover on December 03, 2007, 12:28:05 PM
I have to go for dinner. Dinner-menu says Spaghetti.  :smt019 :smt026  :D :D :D


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: BUCKSHOT on December 03, 2007, 12:29:58 PM
any kalpoe sightings today?
wonder what the two brothers are up to today?

wlso, what has paulus been up to lately? do you think he has been in contact with kalpoe lawyers ? ask the kalpoes to come over for another poolside meeting?

would love to have someone keeping a good eye on them.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: San on December 03, 2007, 12:31:12 PM
I watched an hour-long program on XTC a few nights ago on Discovery, the LC or History Channel, cannot remember which, but I believe at the point Natalee was taken with them in the car, she had already been drugged, and perhaps was drugged a few hours before.  I think she may have been the target of drugs by the bartender, perhaps a call was made to the bartender to make her drink special. 

XTC lasts for about 6 hours.  The drugged person sees all around them as being loving and congenial and nothing is wrong with anyone and that everyone has all good intentions and was described as a 6-hour orgasm.  It makes a person dance for hours, they just want to keep dancing.  (What did we learn from statements?)  Natalee had dance all night.  She had even asked Joran to dance with her.  She had danced while several of her MB girlfriends were dancing.  So, if she was drugged from the get-go by the bartender, who obviously Joran knew well (where did he go when he left the HI?  Did he make a swing by C&C and show the bartender a picture of Natalee from a cell phone that either he or Paulus was using in the casino?) had already "fixed" Natalee's drink and had her "prepped" for Joran when he arrived.  (Mary was not a virgin when she went through the maze = she was drugged long before she got in the car). 

When a person is coming down from the drug, they can act very bizarre, they get very depressed, cry and often scream (She was acting bizarre).

It was said that Guido left his job early that night.  Was he there at CnC's to point out who Natalee was to the bartender.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 03, 2007, 12:34:37 PM
I personally have no experience with XTC or MBMA, but these were intelligent, supposedly well-informed people from NIH, DEA and Congress who were discussing it and discussing its ban in the USA, (1984) brought about by then-Senator Lloyd Benson of Texas, which meant that it could not be used even for research because of its dangers, although some pharmaceutical companies and doctors wanted to make it legal for research, as it had been used in depressed and mentally ill people in double-blind studies in California and had shown definite positive effects on personality disorders. 

So let's assume for the sake of assumption, that she got the drug at about 10 p.m. (in a drink), she had danced since she got there.  Was the drug wearing off and they bought her another drink because Joran saw that she was too "sensical" at this point, so he gave her another.  Is that too much for her heart given her small size and she is already dehydrated from dancing, drinking, being outside for a good part of the day?  I am not arguing the point of whether or not she was drugged, but how much and how often, basing this on what the experts say, if she had the drug around 9:30 or 10 p.m., it would be wearing off by about 2-2:30 a.m. but if she was redosed around midnight, then the drug might either have caused her demise or kept on going until around 5 a.m., more or less.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: San on December 03, 2007, 12:36:05 PM
Good Morning NYC_lover Thank you for reposting the info on Dop Kruimel the other day. I am sorry I misunderstood when you said that she looks like KJ!!!!

Tyler I can see what you're saying and it could be possible, but have always felt that Freddy and not just his camera were involved here. Maybe I am making this more complicated than it actually was, but I'm stuck on Freddy.

"Freddy knows the truth..."  Kalpoe seems to believe if Freddy talks, this will exonerate him and his brother.  So what does Freddy know?  Joran raped Natalee, perhaps so did Guido who she fought off but Freddy was the cameraman.  Does this also make Freddy culpable as K2 or did Freddy claim less guilt since he was only the cameraman.  How do we know that Freddy has not used all this already to get us to the point we are now.  I believe that Freddy has talked his way into a position of "crown witness" or the prosecutor is keeping him as the surprise at the end when needed, perhaps even a film.

I still believe that K2 was involved, but peripherally.

The Bifrons (Babylonians) who helped .... enter GVC.

I believe GVC is a nut job and he absolutely helped.  This loser cannot hold down a job and it was said people can't stand working with him.  Just by his photos alone you can tell he is a jackass.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: JusticeforNatalee on December 03, 2007, 12:36:44 PM
I doubt that Beth was "interrogated." Who used that word, Julia?

I bet that there was a discussion and that all parties at the meeting with Mos asked questions, and he asked questions back.

"Interrogated" sounds like an exaggeration or spin to me.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: MumInOhio on December 03, 2007, 12:37:05 PM
Tyler...What do you think Steve Croes involvement is then? I have been leaning towards him as one of the bifrons, of late. Partly because of the Solognier vehicle search, but I haven't been able to find anything that states definately that Rufo/Raphael Solognier are the same person. TIA


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: San on December 03, 2007, 12:38:07 PM
On Greta's Blog, part of her show tonight...

tonight we will get the latest in the Natalee Holloway story…there is disappointing news out of Aruba but nonetheless I want the inside story of what happened and I assume you do, too…and yes, we will have the inside story assuming all the promises made to us over the weekend are kept…

hmmmm, wonder what this is?

Either Beth, Dave or JQK agreed to be on her show or Joe Tacopina is willing who show her the papers he has.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 03, 2007, 12:38:16 PM
Morning, Monkeys.  I've been reading the comments.  I keep remembering the incident at the Internet Cafe where Beth confronted Deepak.  She asked Deepak if he helped Natalee that night.  He hung his head and didn't look at her. 

Now, Beth knows much, much more of what happened that night.  When she confronted Deepak, it sounded to me like Beth knew Deepak was there when Natalee was assaulted, and she was asking him if he helped her.

From: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/08/09/earlyshow/main766023.shtml

Twitty described her close-up with Deepak to CBS News:

"There were customers on the computer and he was seated behind the cash register, and I guess he thought he was going to have a normal day at work.

"I wanted to ask him, Joran had admitted sexual assaults that he had committed against Natalee, and I wanted to ask Deepak: Did he participate, or did he try to help her?

"He couldn't answer me. He could only look down at the ground."

Beth goes on to say:
"I expected him, if he had no involvement, if he was not a participant in the sexual acts committed against my daughter, that yes, he could have come forward and said, 'No,' and looked me in the eye. He couldn't do that.

Think this through very well.  Tucking his head may mean, "No, I was not there to help her when Joran did that but I was a jackass who hid her body."


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 03, 2007, 12:40:24 PM
Tyler...What do you think Steve Croes involvement is then? I have been leaning towards him as one of the bifrons, of late. Partly because of the Solognier vehicle search, but I haven't been able to find anything that states definately that Rufo/Raphael Solognier are the same person. TIA

Steve was involved .  Either Steve called GVC because he needed his services or GVC called Steve because they needed someone familiar with navigating a boat.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Port Valerie on December 03, 2007, 12:42:13 PM
On Greta's Blog, part of her show tonight...

tonight we will get the latest in the Natalee Holloway story…there is disappointing news out of Aruba but nonetheless I want the inside story of what happened and I assume you do, too…and yes, we will have the inside story assuming all the promises made to us over the weekend are kept…

hmmmm, wonder what this is?

She's been pushing for the "new evidence" because she feels qualified as a lawyer to evaluate it. This will be blather from Joe Taco.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: BUCKSHOT on December 03, 2007, 12:42:51 PM
I doubt that Beth was "interrogated." Who used that word, Julia?

I bet that there was a discussion and that all parties at the meeting with Mos asked questions, and he asked questions back.

"Interrogated" sounds like an exaggeration or spin to me.


i think "interrogated" is definitely a spin. discussion is probably a more truthful description.

flying to aruba just for a six hour meeting, though. couldn't they have discussed things through a conference call? what was the need for the face-to-face meeting, i wonder??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 03, 2007, 12:43:54 PM
I rarely if ever read at Refugees because most of that is just banality, but something I read that did stick out with me that I read there was Glenda describing how horrible it would be for J2K to touch a dead body and trying to impress upon others how it would be, a dead body.  She was telegraphing subconsciously but was not aware of her own statements, how she felt about what they had done but she refused to admit the truth, only allowing her subconscious to do it for her.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 03, 2007, 12:46:38 PM
On Greta's Blog, part of her show tonight...

tonight we will get the latest in the Natalee Holloway story…there is disappointing news out of Aruba but nonetheless I want the inside story of what happened and I assume you do, too…and yes, we will have the inside story assuming all the promises made to us over the weekend are kept…

hmmmm, wonder what this is?

She's been pushing for the "new evidence" because she feels qualified as a lawyer to evaluate it. This will be blather from Joe Taco.



Not worth the power it takes for my flat screen to watch.  Greta is a poseur, if not a downright-opportunist apologist for Tacopino.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Port Valerie on December 03, 2007, 12:47:35 PM
On Greta's Blog, part of her show tonight...

tonight we will get the latest in the Natalee Holloway story…there is disappointing news out of Aruba but nonetheless I want the inside story of what happened and I assume you do, too…and yes, we will have the inside story assuming all the promises made to us over the weekend are kept…

hmmmm, wonder what this is?

Probably Tacky Joe's promise to give to Greta the 15 pages the prosecutor gave the defense attorneys.  Anyone want to make a bet that he doesn't really have it and won't come through? :lol:

OR ... Joe T will give Greta the text of his appeal to get Joran out early which he said he would offer up today.

Greta says "assuming that promises are kept." That indicates that her "inside story" involves something that is going to happen today. (Otherwise, the "promises" could have been kept earlier -- that is, information could have been passed to Greta already, over the weekend.)

If Joe T gives Greta the text of some of his blather, it is meaningless. Who cares? Who listens?



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 03, 2007, 12:47:46 PM
Yoo Hoo!!  Simian.  Yes, you!   How could the Kalpoes be innocent if they didn't know what happened after they left?  HUH? That's what you said...the Hindus were told around the pool...how can they be charged with abuse of a corpse?  You said they weren't there...are you wrong?

 Come on, I know you want to explain.  You  can use the FP of SM...you've done it before....are you chicken now?  It's almost over...do you want these guys to get away with this?  Are you really for law and justice as you claim? 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: BUCKSHOT on December 03, 2007, 12:51:02 PM
Aruba: Prime Minister Oduber to refuse Emergency Colonoscopy
AP Breaking:


Oranjstaad: The Prime Minister of Aruba, Nelson Oduber was rushed to the hospital last week in what doctors are calling a major trauma to Mr. Oduber's head.

Mr. Oduber has been noticeably silent lately, which some considered odd since Aruba is once again in the worldwide spotlight.

While doctors will not say exactly how the accident happened, it appears the Prime Minister's tongue has been severed. Police are investigating how this could have happened since Mr. Oduber was alone when he tried to call for help.

"At this point, we can find no traces of the severed tongue." When questioned about where it might be so doctors can attempt a re-attachment, the Prime Minister's spokesman, American Lawyer Joe Tacopina told authorities to stick it you know where."

On that advice, a specialist from Holland was brought in and recommended an immediate colonoscopy. Dr. Mos was quoted as saying "with the help of Tim Miller from TES, I believe we will have the equipment necessary to find the tongue."

"If it's in there, I can assure you, we will find it" said Tim Miller, founder of Texas Equusearch.

"They have nothing and will find nothing"said Joe Tacopina, who has done more talking on behalf of Aruba than the Prime Minister lately.

When asked by a reporter why the Prime Minister needs a spokesperson he responded,"mphmmnfphuyosh."


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: MumInOhio on December 03, 2007, 12:51:36 PM
I watched an hour-long program on XTC a few nights ago on Discovery, the LC or History Channel, cannot remember which, but I believe at the point Natalee was taken with them in the car, she had already been drugged, and perhaps was drugged a few hours before.  I think she may have been the target of drugs by the bartender, perhaps a call was made to the bartender to make her drink special. 

XTC lasts for about 6 hours.  The drugged person sees all around them as being loving and congenial and nothing is wrong with anyone and that everyone has all good intentions and was described as a 6-hour orgasm.  It makes a person dance for hours, they just want to keep dancing.  (What did we learn from statements?)  Natalee had dance all night.  She had even asked Joran to dance with her.  She had danced while several of her MB girlfriends were dancing.  So, if she was drugged from the get-go by the bartender, who obviously Joran knew well (where did he go when he left the HI?  Did he make a swing by C&C and show the bartender a picture of Natalee from a cell phone that either he or Paulus was using in the casino?) had already "fixed" Natalee's drink and had her "prepped" for Joran when he arrived.  (Mary was not a virgin when she went through the maze = she was drugged long before she got in the car). 

When a person is coming down from the drug, they can act very bizarre, they get very depressed, cry and often scream (She was acting bizarre).

It was said that Guido left his job early that night.  Was he there at CnC's to point out who Natalee was to the bartender.


San...It's possible. I have always thought Freddy, but could of been Guido. Still think that Satish went there first and that is why his timeline in his 5/31 statement doesn't match. Following that line of thinking, had believed Steve's involvement was that he knew who was with whom at C&Cs. They arrested him to keep him quiet. Wonder if any of Natalee's friends saw J2Ks together in C&C's. BBL


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 03, 2007, 12:53:56 PM
I doubt that Beth was "interrogated." Who used that word, Julia?

I bet that there was a discussion and that all parties at the meeting with Mos asked questions, and he asked questions back.

"Interrogated" sounds like an exaggeration or spin to me.


i think "interrogated" is definitely a spin. discussion is probably a more truthful description.

flying to aruba just for a six hour meeting, though. couldn't they have discussed things through a conference call? what was the need for the face-to-face meeting, i wonder??

I am not sure how many of you have ever had to testify in a criminal case but oftentimes witnesses are brought in before the prosecution and interrogated to "test" how they will do on the witness stand.  As far as Tito's statements go in evaluating this, he probably is parroting what Glenda a/k/a Renfro told him to say, and we had already heard that before.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 03, 2007, 12:54:48 PM
Yoo Hoo!!  Simian.  Yes, you!   How could the Kalpoes be innocent if they didn't know what happened after they left?  HUH? That's what you said...the Hindus were told around the pool...how can they be charged with abuse of a corpse?  You said they weren't there...are you wrong?

 Come on, I know you want to explain.  You  can use the FP of SM...you've done it before....are you chicken now?  It's almost over...do you want these guys to get away with this?  Are you really for law and justice as you claim? 

 :PYoo Hoo!! Lala's. Yes, you!! What if Simian was one of the peeps who died by suicide w/ one hand in pocket over the past 2.5 years on  Hell Hole Island ? :shock:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 03, 2007, 12:55:36 PM
Yoo Hoo!!  Simian.  Yes, you!   How could the Kalpoes be innocent if they didn't know what happened after they left?  HUH? That's what you said...the Hindus were told around the pool...how can they be charged with abuse of a corpse?  You said they weren't there...are you wrong?

 Come on, I know you want to explain.  You  can use the FP of SM...you've done it before....are you chicken now?  It's almost over...do you want these guys to get away with this?  Are you really for law and justice as you claim? 

:P Yoo Hoo!! Lala's. Yes, you!! What if Simian was one of the peeps who died by suicide w/ one hand in pocket over the past 2.5 years on  Hell Hole Island ? :shock:
self edit  :P


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 03, 2007, 12:55:42 PM
Hey Simian!  Tell us about the 3 vehicles and that 4 AM phone call.  Was Joran driving the jeep that night?  Is that why they impounded it?  Who told you he was in the jeep?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 03, 2007, 12:56:41 PM
Yoo Hoo!!  Simian.  Yes, you!   How could the Kalpoes be innocent if they didn't know what happened after they left?  HUH? That's what you said...the Hindus were told around the pool...how can they be charged with abuse of a corpse?  You said they weren't there...are you wrong?

 Come on, I know you want to explain.  You  can use the FP of SM...you've done it before....are you chicken now?  It's almost over...do you want these guys to get away with this?  Are you really for law and justice as you claim? 

 :PYoo Hoo!! Lala's. Yes, you!! What if Simian was one of the peeps who died by suicide w/ one hand in pocket over the past 2.5 years on  Hell Hole Island ? :shock:

What if?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 03, 2007, 12:58:51 PM
Meant to say oftentimes, not often times.  Spell checker does not remind us about that, now does it?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 03, 2007, 12:59:59 PM
Nut
Simian is still there alive and kicking...trust me on this...(I think I just sounded like Rob :shock:) 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 03, 2007, 01:02:29 PM
Lala's...I read a post of yours a couple days ago...yes, I am, as usual,  way behind....but you said you knew who shango is/was?  are you willing to share that with us?  what happened to this person? dead or alive??  I am the first to admit I don't understand one word of the posts....but I wonder what in the hell happened?? did this person really have any knowledge or was he/she pulling our legs


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 03, 2007, 01:04:44 PM
Nut
Simian is still there alive and kicking...trust me on this...(I think I just sounded like Rob :shock:) 
  i'll trust you as i know how much time and effort you have put in.....so what happened to simian?  why does he/she not post anymore and why the sudden stop...it seems the latest developments would bring them out once again??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: San on December 03, 2007, 01:06:45 PM
Meant to say oftentimes, not often times.  Spell checker does not remind us about that, now does it?

I fixed it Tyler.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 03, 2007, 01:07:11 PM
Lala's...I read a post of yours a couple days ago...yes, I am, as usual,  way behind....but you said you knew who shango is/was?  are you willing to share that with us?  what happened to this person? dead or alive??  I am the first to admit I don't understand one word of the posts....but I wonder what in the hell happened?? did this person really have any knowledge or was he/she pulling our legs

If I tell you then how will I know if the real Shango ever comes back?  :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 03, 2007, 01:08:21 PM
Nut
Simian is still there alive and kicking...trust me on this...(I think I just sounded like Rob :shock:) 
  i'll trust you as i know how much time and effort you have put in.....so what happened to simian?  why does he/she not post anymore and why the sudden stop...it seems the latest developments would bring them out once again??

Simian is a coward...plain and simple.  The PTB on hell island still control things...don't kid yourself.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 03, 2007, 01:09:59 PM
Lala's...I read a post of yours a couple days ago...yes, I am, as usual,  way behind....but you said you knew who shango is/was?  are you willing to share that with us?  what happened to this person? dead or alive??  I am the first to admit I don't understand one word of the posts....but I wonder what in the hell happened?? did this person really have any knowledge or was he/she pulling our legs

If I tell you then how will I know if the real Shango ever comes back?  :roll:

he/she would give you a sign???  :lol:   seriously...do you think he/she will ever come back and explain the writings?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 03, 2007, 01:10:57 PM
Nut
Simian is still there alive and kicking...trust me on this...(I think I just sounded like Rob :shock:) 
  i'll trust you as i know how much time and effort you have put in.....so what happened to simian?  why does he/she not post anymore and why the sudden stop...it seems the latest developments would bring them out once again??

Simian is a coward...plain and simple.  The PTB on hell island still control things...don't kid yourself.

that's sad isn't it....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 03, 2007, 01:12:18 PM
Thanks, San.   :smt052

Lala's, maybe not a coward, just an opportunist.  My grandfather always said those types "will join them if they can't beat 'em."


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 03, 2007, 01:12:42 PM
Lala's...I read a post of yours a couple days ago...yes, I am, as usual,  way behind....but you said you knew who shango is/was?  are you willing to share that with us?  what happened to this person? dead or alive??  I am the first to admit I don't understand one word of the posts....but I wonder what in the hell happened?? did this person really have any knowledge or was he/she pulling our legs

If I tell you then how will I know if the real Shango ever comes back?  :roll:

he/she would give you a sign???  :lol:   seriously...do you think he/she will ever come back and explain the writings?

Not likely. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 03, 2007, 01:12:48 PM
Posted by Heli at RU:

The Lineup Dec 2, 2007 TRANSCRIPT

The Lineup
December 2, 2007

Transcribed from DVD recording by Heli

Kimberley:

Now with the Judge ruling that the Kalpoe brothers can no longer be held in jail, what was one thought of a promise to find out what happened to Natalee Holloway may now seem to be a little less likely.

Joining us from Aruba with the very latest is journalist Tito Lacle. Tito, thanks for joinin me and the latest development that we're hearing is that the Kalpoe brothers are out and what is the new information that aruban authorities interrogated Beth Holloway for 5 hours on Saturday?

Tito:

That's true what you just mentioned. A few minutes ago, actually about an hour and a half ago the latest one of the brothers, Deepak, was released from jail and was picked up by his lawyer and the lawyer for Satish too. His brother Satish was released about an hour earlier from another prison in another City and they're both safe and sound at home and awaiting for the word about what happens to their fate come December 31.

As for the second part, yes Beth Holloway came in this morning about 9 o'clock, about 1/2 hour later than expected in a police station in the city Oranjestadt and after which she was put in a conversation with the prosecuting office, Hans Mos and Dop Kruimel After that was finished both the prosecutors left the office or left the police station and by surprise the interrogators came in and (inaudible) by Dolph Richardson the chief investigaor, they started interrogating her which lasted for over 5 hours. She left not very happy and wouldn't say anything on camera. She left the police department about 2:30

Kimberley:

I think people are going to be surprised by that because the latest that I ahd heard was that Dave Holloway and Beth were going to Aruba to present evidence , information that they have from their own private investigation into the disappearance of their daughter, that they wanted to provide that to the prosecutors, hear where the case stood with the prosecutors and sort of have this symbiotic relationship where they could finally work together because they didn't get to have that with the previous prosecutor, Karin Janssen

Tito:

That is correct. I must say the prosecuting team is totally different one than before, more open and they said yesterday they accepted the invitation of the Holloways to come to Aruba and have a conversation because they have a right to find out what happened so far and we are (inaudible) to give them all that information so they were very happy to share the information with the Holloways.

Kimberley:

Alright, Tito thank you for that update, we certainly appreciate it.

And now we are joined by Joe Tacopina who is the attorney for Joran van der Sloot.

So Joe you were saying that there's no new evidence and that your client would be released. I know he wasn't up for review yet, but do you think overall it's a good sign for him because the Kalpoes were sprung?

Joe:

Of course it's a good sign, I mean look it's the same new evidence that was incriminating of "serious stuff" against all three. It's only a matter of time now until Joran gets released in fact we've filed, we will be filing first thing on Monday morning for his immediate release as opposed to waiting towards the end of the week  

Kimberley:

So you're saying there's really no new evidence or is there perhaps some new evidence they haven't even shared with you guys besides the 14 or so pages of discovery because we're hearing about reports of forensic retrieval of computer, e-mail messages and that type of things

Joe:

There's no new evidence, look we're here in December now, they accept their own deadline for December 31. I've seen the 14 pages, there's no new evidence and there's certainly no new incriminating evidence and the funniest thing out of yesterday's press conference that I heard from the prosecutor was when he said "we were really disappointed with this ruling because we really wanted a chance to confront them with this new evidence" Well, they had 8 days, what are they waiting for, when were they going to confront them

Kimberley:

But I've also been told that in Aruba you can't be held beyond the 8 days unless they think you're guilty of a crime that carriest a term longer than 4 years so that may actually explain it and they say you can't be held for something like dumping, movement of a dead body, but there's a lot to talk about and I have to get to the panel, but keep us posted about Joran.

I need to bring in Dr Michael Baden who joins us now. Dr. Baden we also understand that there's new developments under way in terms of searching the area for Natalee's body. A new ship has come on with special sonar equipment that the Holloways at least think could be very optimistic in terms of finding Natalee and what everyone wants to know is ok it's been quite a long time, is there still evidenciary value if they recover anything?

Baden:

Yeah it is possible to find a body using all new technologies that's been in the water as long as Natalee Holloway and the teeth, the DNA, the bones will still be in good shape. They'll be able to make identification; if there are injuries to the body they'll be able to still after this time has passed, still be able to identify injuries to the bones if the body is in some kind of a container or some kind of clothing. So it is possible to get a great deal of information if they find some kind of remnants of the body

Kimberley:

And of course I'll bring in Pat Brosnan, of course the prosecutor is saying he has sufficient evidence to suggest that Natalee Holloway is deceased, she is no longer with us. I think they feel they've overcome that obstacle, the body of course would no doubt help but you have to look at the case here with the Kalpoe brothers and Joran and they're still saying just even if you find her body, even if Natalee Holloway is deceased it doesn't mean we had anything to do with it however, they're the lsat ones to be seen with her and they've had multiple changes in their stories.

Brosnan:

Absolutely, and looking at it without any new evidence that might have came in, it seems like nothing of any substantive value came in, the only theory that I could even advance for them bringing them in for this 8 day interrogation is perhaps by putting them in different locations and with the passage of time, even though these guys are battle hardened veterans to investigative bullying, they've been there done that back in June of '05 for 4 months, they're tough but they're also young and they could have a measure of naivety on them, perhaps they could divide and conquer. To get someone to make a misstep

Kimberley:

Well that's what they need to get in this case or else they won't be able to move the ball forward

Mickey Sherman:

It's just cruel to the family to have done this, it's like one of these John Mark Karr things where we finally got the guilty guy and they didn't have wit closer in the case and to do this, put the victim's family through this is cruel, they should not have gone forward

Kimberley:

This whole ending of the case, they're saying we need to decide whether we're going to bring charges against them by the end of the year but it goes in front of a Judge and this Judge isn't finding that there's sufficient evidence to hold them beyond the 8 days. How is that going to amount to a conviction at this point unless they got anothe statement in this little squeeze play

Mickey Sherman:

And again, they've been through that little bully process and don't forget they arrested 2 other guys before these guys, then they arrested these guys then they unarrested these guys and now they arrested them again. What jury, I don't care what country you're in, is going to have any kind of confidence in this.

Kimberley:

That's the problem, it really is.

Thank you Klaas.

I am praying that the judge does not bow down to the defence regarding the filing to release Joran early.  It would provide Joran with the opportunity of again getting stories straight with the Kalpoes and Paulus in regards to the "new evidence" and the "re-examined "old" evidence.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 03, 2007, 01:14:25 PM
Lala's...I read a post of yours a couple days ago...yes, I am, as usual,  way behind....but you said you knew who shango is/was?  are you willing to share that with us?  what happened to this person? dead or alive??  I am the first to admit I don't understand one word of the posts....but I wonder what in the hell happened?? did this person really have any knowledge or was he/she pulling our legs

If I tell you then how will I know if the real Shango ever comes back?  :roll:

he/she would give you a sign???  :lol:   seriously...do you think he/she will ever come back and explain the writings?

Not likely. 

and why do you say not likely???


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 03, 2007, 01:14:30 PM
It's time to get some Christmas shopping done (way past time) so I will join you later.  Hope everyone has a good day and let's keep our chins up, our attitudes positive and our prayers with Tim Miller and the Holloways and their extended families.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 03, 2007, 01:15:50 PM
I am taking Beth, Dave's and JQK's silence as a good sign..I think Mos gave them some hope...what do you think?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Anna on December 03, 2007, 01:16:09 PM

I have never felt that the Kalpoes went to C&C to pick up girls. They are too unattractive to appeal to blond American girls from Alabama, and in all the pictures we've seen they hang out with a much tougher type of girl. Rather, I think they went to C&C to sell drugs to the Americans who were going home the next day. That's what THEY had done twenty times before and it always worked.

I think Joran went to C&C in the hopes of getting a girl or having a good time or just doing something interesting on a Sunday night. He was the entry point, giving the Kalpoes access to this American group.

Joran and the Kalpoes had two different interests but they benefitted each other -- Kalpoes had the car that Joran needed and Joran had the access to the American group that the Kalpoes needed.

It was just an ordinary night.










Another interesting possibility.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Magnolia on December 03, 2007, 01:16:27 PM
Nut
Simian is still there alive and kicking...trust me on this...(I think I just sounded like Rob :shock:) 
  i'll trust you as i know how much time and effort you have put in.....so what happened to simian?  why does he/she not post anymore and why the sudden stop...it seems the latest developments would bring them out once again??

Simian is a coward...plain and simple.  The PTB on hell island still control things...don't kid yourself.

I remember reading here a long time ago that Dave knew who Simiam
was and had talked with him.  It was a mod that made that statement.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: NYC_lover on December 03, 2007, 01:16:47 PM
I am back. RTL-boulevard were few minutes ago talking about the Holloway case.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 03, 2007, 01:16:52 PM
It's time to get some Christmas shopping done (way past time) so I will join you later.  Hope everyone has a good day and let's keep our chins up, our attitudes positive and our prayers with Tim Miller and the Holloways and their extended families.

Later Tyler......I have enjoyed all your posts from yesterday and today.....hurry back


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: dennisintn on December 03, 2007, 01:17:31 PM
[

Hi Tyler.  I have to respectfully disagree.  Ecstasy, or MDMA, does not going to fit the description of the activities of that night.  First off, Natalee didn't arrive at C & C's until rather late, probably 10 PM or after.  This would only give her a maximum of 3 hours to dance.  We saw her in the casino, seated at the BJ table up until 9:30 or so.  For someone who loved to dance, as Natalee did, three hours of dancing would be fun, not an ecstasy-induced marathon. 

Joran bought her a shot of 151 rum right at closing time.  I have no doubt this was poured from the special bottle kept behind the bar for ladies.  For $20 or $25 a shot, the lady gets a GHB-laced shot.  Because the drink is intended to be taken in one shot, without time to taste it before pouring it down the throat, this is the ideal way to administer a date-rape drug.  Do you remember Joran saying Natalee told him she would take it in two drinks, not one?  She didn't like to take shots--too strong and nasty for a non-drinker--and I think she just managed about half of it.  The drug takes effect in 20-30 minutes, thus the need to give it just before closing so the rapist can get his target into his car soon after the administration of the drug and before the target passes out and becomes incoherent.  Remember, Natalee's friend said she wasn't talking much and her eyes looked heavy as she was leaving.  She was already becoming disoriented.  These are not symptoms of ecstacy, or MDMA, but of a stronger drug like GHB.

I believe Natalee took enough of the drug in her half shot that she was incapacitated but not enough to keep her unconscious.  She woke and fought with Joran and her other attackers, leading to her death by violence.
[/quote]


azlady, i do believe you have hit the nail square on the head.
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 03, 2007, 01:18:29 PM
Thanks, San.   :smt052

Lala's, maybe not a coward, just an opportunist.  My grandfather always said those types "will join them if they can't beat 'em."

Yes, that is a good way to phrase it...Simian is a cowardly opportunist...get with the program Simian...come out...help us here.  If you really want justice in this case...the time is now.  Tell us who was in the 3 vehicles that you claim were there that night.  Tell us about the 5th suspect.  Why did you use the term 'boyfriend"?  Explain how they can charge the Kalpoes with abuse of a corpse if they were not there afterwards.  Still waiting Simian...I know you read here...email me...I promise I will not divulge anything. I know other things and have never let them out.  I just want to know you are real and that you really did have an inside into this fiasco you call justice.  Here's my email...it's a throw away addy...easy to use.  cindoal@yahoo.com.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 03, 2007, 01:19:52 PM

KIM GUILFOYLE THE LINE UP SUNDAY NIGHT FOX PART #1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uxgqo0OGTuA


KIM GUILFOYLE THE LINE UP SUNDAY NIGHT FOX PART #2

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=itfQ1pnfsSU



Thank you Carpe.

I appreciate your Youtube videos.  This Canadian only gets CNN ... not the other American channels where many of the Natalee Holloway interviews take place.

Janet



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 03, 2007, 01:20:12 PM
Lala's...I read a post of yours a couple days ago...yes, I am, as usual,  way behind....but you said you knew who shango is/was?  are you willing to share that with us?  what happened to this person? dead or alive??  I am the first to admit I don't understand one word of the posts....but I wonder what in the hell happened?? did this person really have any knowledge or was he/she pulling our legs

If I tell you then how will I know if the real Shango ever comes back?  :roll:

he/she would give you a sign???  :lol:   seriously...do you think he/she will ever come back and explain the writings?

Not likely. 

and why do you say not likely???

Has anyone ever told you that you would make a good attorney?  :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: igsigs on December 03, 2007, 01:20:44 PM
I am back. RTL-boulevard were few minutes ago talking about the Holloway case.

Anything new?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 03, 2007, 01:23:38 PM
Lala's...I read a post of yours a couple days ago...yes, I am, as usual,  way behind....but you said you knew who shango is/was?  are you willing to share that with us?  what happened to this person? dead or alive??  I am the first to admit I don't understand one word of the posts....but I wonder what in the hell happened?? did this person really have any knowledge or was he/she pulling our legs

If I tell you then how will I know if the real Shango ever comes back?  :roll:

he/she would give you a sign???  :lol:   seriously...do you think he/she will ever come back and explain the writings?

Not likely. 

and why do you say not likely???

Has anyone ever told you that you would make a good attorney?  :roll:

OK...no more questions


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: NYC_lover on December 03, 2007, 01:24:40 PM
I am taking Beth, Dave's and JQK's silence as a good sign..I think Mos gave them some hope...what do you think?
This a good be. But one hope topic, I don't audacity about to talking. I just think about the arrest why Mos has arrested J2K and about the possible new evidence.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: nonesuche on December 03, 2007, 01:25:57 PM
I admire your persistence Lala's - Simian are you listening out there? Piece of cake, just an email, help a sistah out !

While RU exults in thinking Beth was 'interrogated' I expect that walking back through her journal, all the events of those days, including the stonewalling of K Jannsen and ALE for five hours was an exhausting process emotionally for her. I don't doubt she's not speaking to press for a good reason, she has JKelly to handle that and it's ridiculous that Titomebrainless thinks Beth is going to provide him one ounce of a statement knowing he's messenger/spy for Renho?

Beth is no fool, it really irritates them that she won't play their mind games doesn't it?

I appreciate Kimberly's capability to cut through the Tito fluff and get to the heart of this, unlike Greta.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 03, 2007, 01:25:58 PM
I am taking Beth, Dave's and JQK's silence as a good sign..I think Mos gave them some hope...what do you think?

Sunny ... I do not know what to think anymore.   :sad:

If Tito has any credibility ... his words that imply insider knowledge  are the truth ...

Janet

++++++++++++++++++++


Posted by Heli at RU:

The Lineup Dec 2, 2007 TRANSCRIPT

The Lineup
December 2, 2007

Transcribed from DVD recording by Heli


As for the second part, yes Beth Holloway came in this morning about 9 o'clock, about 1/2 hour later than expected in a police station in the city Oranjestadt and after which she was put in a conversation with the prosecuting office, Hans Mos and Dop Kruimel After that was finished both the prosecutors left the office or left the police station and by surprise the interrogators came in and (inaudible) by Dolph Richardson the chief investigaor, they started interrogating her which lasted for over 5 hours. She left not very happy and wouldn't say anything on camera. She left the police department about 2:30


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Anna on December 03, 2007, 01:26:45 PM
[

Hi Tyler.  I have to respectfully disagree.  Ecstasy, or MDMA, does not going to fit the description of the activities of that night.  First off, Natalee didn't arrive at C & C's until rather late, probably 10 PM or after.  This would only give her a maximum of 3 hours to dance.  We saw her in the casino, seated at the BJ table up until 9:30 or so.  For someone who loved to dance, as Natalee did, three hours of dancing would be fun, not an ecstasy-induced marathon. 

Joran bought her a shot of 151 rum right at closing time.  I have no doubt this was poured from the special bottle kept behind the bar for ladies.  For $20 or $25 a shot, the lady gets a GHB-laced shot.  Because the drink is intended to be taken in one shot, without time to taste it before pouring it down the throat, this is the ideal way to administer a date-rape drug.  Do you remember Joran saying Natalee told him she would take it in two drinks, not one?  She didn't like to take shots--too strong and nasty for a non-drinker--and I think she just managed about half of it.  The drug takes effect in 20-30 minutes, thus the need to give it just before closing so the rapist can get his target into his car soon after the administration of the drug and before the target passes out and becomes incoherent.  Remember, Natalee's friend said she wasn't talking much and her eyes looked heavy as she was leaving.  She was already becoming disoriented.  These are not symptoms of ecstacy, or MDMA, but of a stronger drug like GHB.

I believe Natalee took enough of the drug in her half shot that she was incapacitated but not enough to keep her unconscious.  She woke and fought with Joran and her other attackers, leading to her death by violence.


azlady, i do believe you have hit the nail square on the head.
dennisintn
[/quote]

I have always wondered if the bartenders tended to slip a little XTC into the drinks of pretty girls to try to get them to dance, etc.  Some of those photos and vids do not look normal at all.  Especially one of the videos taken aboard the Tattoo where the crowd seems in some sort of sexual frenzy,  Could there be such a thing as mass drugging or at least targeted by bartender?

Had this already been done and then Joran added the drink he ordered with the GHB in it and this caused some sort of reaction or overdose?  Or combative behavior.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 03, 2007, 01:29:17 PM
Nut
Simian is still there alive and kicking...trust me on this...(I think I just sounded like Rob :shock:) 
  i'll trust you as i know how much time and effort you have put in.....so what happened to simian?  why does he/she not post anymore and why the sudden stop...it seems the latest developments would bring them out once again??

Simian is a coward...plain and simple.  The PTB on hell island still control things...don't kid yourself.

I remember reading here a long time ago that Dave knew who Simiam
was and had talked with him.  It was a mod that made that statement.

I think it may have been Shango and not Simian...then again what do I remember?  I thought Simian's identity was not in question any longer...but as I said, what do I know?

 I don't know if Dave has ever met the real Shango...I would say it's likely that he did..but I am fairly certain that Beth has.  No. Beth didn't say that...I figured it out all by my dumb little self. 

Thanks for reminding me Magnolia...btw just so you know I have you on Santa's "nice" list this year.  :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: NYC_lover on December 03, 2007, 01:29:35 PM
I am back. RTL-boulevard were few minutes ago talking about the Holloway case.

Anything new?

Not really, crime reporter from RTL NL and to same with a professor criminal law were just talking to the news reporters about NO body No evidence.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 03, 2007, 01:31:35 PM
I admire your persistence Lala's - Simian are you listening out there? Piece of cake, just an email, help a sistah out !

While RU exults in thinking Beth was 'interrogated' I expect that walking back through her journal, all the events of those days, including the stonewalling of K Jannsen and ALE for five hours was an exhausting process emotionally for her. I don't doubt she's not speaking to press for a good reason, she has JKelly to handle that and it's ridiculous that Titomebrainless thinks Beth is going to provide him one ounce of a statement knowing he's messenger/spy for Renho?

Beth is no fool, it really irritates them that she won't play their mind games doesn't it?

I appreciate Kimberly's capability to cut through the Tito fluff and get to the heart of this, unlike Greta.

persistence or persnickety-ness?  Hi there Nosey!  (Did you know everyone thinks I am being mean to you when I call you Nosey? LOL..shhh...our secret.)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 03, 2007, 01:34:36 PM
I am taking Beth, Dave's and JQK's silence as a good sign..I think Mos gave them some hope...what do you think?

Sunny ... I do not know what to think anymore.   :sad:

If Tito has any credibility ... his words that imply insider knowledge  are the truth ...

Janet

++++++++++++++++++++


Posted by Heli at RU:

The Lineup Dec 2, 2007 TRANSCRIPT

The Lineup
December 2, 2007

Transcribed from DVD recording by Heli


As for the second part, yes Beth Holloway came in this morning about 9 o'clock, about 1/2 hour later than expected in a police station in the city Oranjestadt and after which she was put in a conversation with the prosecuting office, Hans Mos and Dop Kruimel After that was finished both the prosecutors left the office or left the police station and by surprise the interrogators came in and (inaudible) by Dolph Richardson the chief investigaor, they started interrogating her which lasted for over 5 hours. She left not very happy and wouldn't say anything on camera. She left the police department about 2:30

I don't think Tito has any creditability at all.....and I can't see them even trying to interrogate Beth.....I am sure they were elated to talk with her and have her share all her information with the,...the more REAL information the have the better!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Magnolia on December 03, 2007, 01:36:32 PM
Nut
Simian is still there alive and kicking...trust me on this...(I think I just sounded like Rob :shock:) 
  i'll trust you as i know how much time and effort you have put in.....so what happened to simian?  why does he/she not post anymore and why the sudden stop...it seems the latest developments would bring them out once again??

Simian is a coward...plain and simple.  The PTB on hell island still control things...don't kid yourself.

I remember reading here a long time ago that Dave knew who Simiam
was and had talked with him.  It was a mod that made that statement.

I think it may have been Shango and not Simian...then again what do I remember?  I thought Simian's identity was not in question any longer...but as I said, what do I know?

 I don't know if Dave has ever met the real Shango...I would say it's likely that he did..but I am fairly certain that Beth has.  No. Beth didn't say that...I figured it out all by my dumb little self. 

Thanks for reminding me Magnolia...btw just so you know I have you on Santa's "nice" list this year.  :roll:

Ooooooh, thanks!  Maybe he will bring me a nice surprise!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 03, 2007, 01:36:48 PM
Nut
Simian is still there alive and kicking...trust me on this...(I think I just sounded like Rob :shock:) 
  i'll trust you as i know how much time and effort you have put in.....so what happened to simian?  why does he/she not post anymore and why the sudden stop...it seems the latest developments would bring them out once again??

Simian is a coward...plain and simple.  The PTB on hell island still control things...don't kid yourself.

I remember reading here a long time ago that Dave knew who Simiam
was and had talked with him.  It was a mod that made that statement.

I think it may have been Shango and not Simian...then again what do I remember?  I thought Simian's identity was not in question any longer...but as I said, what do I know?

 I don't know if Dave has ever met the real Shango...I would say it's likely that he did..but I am fairly certain that Beth has.  No. Beth didn't say that...I figured it out all by my dumb little self. 

Thanks for reminding me Magnolia...btw just so you know I have you on Santa's "nice" list this year.  :roll:

???????????????????????????????????? :silent: :silent: :silent: :silent: :silent:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: AZLady on December 03, 2007, 01:39:04 PM

I have always wondered if the bartenders tended to slip a little XTC into the drinks of pretty girls to try to get them to dance, etc.  Some of those photos and vids do not look normal at all.  Especially one of the videos taken aboard the Tattoo where the crowd seems in some sort of sexual frenzy,  Could there be such a thing as mass drugging or at least targeted by bartender?

Had this already been done and then Joran added the drink he ordered with the GHB in it and this caused some sort of reaction or overdose?  Or combative behavior.

I doubt it, Anna.  Too expensive.  Ecstasy is about $10 a pop, sometimes more.  Why do they care if the girls dance?  Besides, girls dance without any prodding and often without any male partners, with each other.  Ecstasy is a stimulant, not a depressant.  Taking ecstasy is not going to lead to any mad sexual frenzy but more of a mellow, loving attitude. 

Yes, I'm sure bartender targeted certain girls with the "special bottle drinks" but he's not going to dispense these for free.  They need to be paid for by men who want a nearly unconscious girl at closing time.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 03, 2007, 01:41:39 PM

I have always wondered if the bartenders tended to slip a little XTC into the drinks of pretty girls to try to get them to dance, etc.  Some of those photos and vids do not look normal at all.  Especially one of the videos taken aboard the Tattoo where the crowd seems in some sort of sexual frenzy,  Could there be such a thing as mass drugging or at least targeted by bartender?

Had this already been done and then Joran added the drink he ordered with the GHB in it and this caused some sort of reaction or overdose?  Or combative behavior.

I doubt it, Anna.  Too expensive.  Ecstasy is about $10 a pop, sometimes more.  Why do they care if the girls dance?  Besides, girls dance without any prodding and often without any male partners, with each other.  Ecstasy is a stimulant, not a depressant.  Taking ecstasy is not going to lead to any mad sexual frenzy but more of a mellow, loving attitude. 

Yes, I'm sure bartender targeted certain girls with the "special bottle drinks" but he's not going to dispense these for free.  They need to be paid for by men who want a nearly unconscious girl at closing time.

They couldn't drug her too much before they got her in the car..otherwise she would have gone back with her group if she was feeling really bad. She had to appear to agree to this on her own.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: AZLady on December 03, 2007, 01:42:00 PM
Ecstasy is usually in pill form.  However, I believe Shango's reference was to something called by the street name of "Liquid Ecstasy" which is not the same as the pill form of Ecstasy or MDMA.  "Liquid Ecstasy" is a street name for GHB, the date rape drug.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Magnolia on December 03, 2007, 01:42:57 PM
XTC is an upper. 
BHT is a downer.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: AZLady on December 03, 2007, 01:43:26 PM
Lala's, exactly.  That's why these drinks are only poured at closing time or when the guy is ready to take the girl away from the bar.  There is a narrow window of about 20 - 30 minutes before the girl is unconscious.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: AZLady on December 03, 2007, 01:45:20 PM
And, that's also why these predator rapists go to the bars a half hour before closing.  No need to go any earlier.  They are not interested in meeting someone for conversation and romance that would require them to establish a relationship.  Noooo.....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: NYC_lover on December 03, 2007, 01:54:32 PM
Does someone know this: Can somebody, when there is suspicion to a suspect, when this person is a suspect for hiding a body and the body is never found, can the person get a jail-sentence in the US?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: nonesuche on December 03, 2007, 01:56:14 PM


persistence or persnickety-ness?  Hi there Nosey!  (Did you know everyone thinks I am being mean to you when I call you Nosey? LOL..shhh...our secret.)


 :lol: :lol: yes I am sure 'some' revel in your nic for me but good thing they couldn't see us hugging at that game when we met, lord knows what rumors they would conjure up around that too  :lol: :lol:

nosey I is  :lol: :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: nonesuche on December 03, 2007, 01:59:20 PM
I haven't looked at Greta's blog in forever but did so this morning, she's copying SM's FP now wanting posters to name the caption for Deepak's release from jail photo?

I had to wonder if she's trying to capitalize on what SM has generated but it appears a good many of the posters there are drinking that RU Kook-Aid on a regular basis  :lol:

They are so easy to spot  :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: NYC_lover on December 03, 2007, 02:10:18 PM
News in McCann case:
New witness again Robert Murat in the McCann case.

The new witness is the 20-years-old Charlotte Pennington.
Charlotte has told Newspaper the Sun, she has see Robert Murat, the night of disappear of Madeleine McCann at the apartment. Where Madeleine and her little twin brother and sister were sleeping that night.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2007, 02:14:29 PM
Does someone know this: Can somebody, when there is suspicion to a suspect, when this person is a suspect for hiding a body and the body is never found, can the person get a jail-sentence in the US?

YES


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: NYC_lover on December 03, 2007, 02:16:33 PM
Does someone know this: Can somebody, when there is suspicion to a suspect, when this person is a suspect for hiding a body and the body is never found, can the person get a jail-sentence in the US?

YES

Ok, thank you Klaasend. It's the same here in the Netherlands.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2007, 02:17:09 PM
Posted by Lazlo at RU:

Lazlo Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2007 1:42 pm   
Beth knew she was going to be "questioned"

Unlike rumors like: "it came as a total suprise to Beth that she was going to be 'interrogated' " she knew days before she went to Aruba that the investigators had certain questions they wanted to ask her.

If you doubt this, check what Art Wood said on Friday night, a day before the alleged "suprise interrogations" took place. 


Lazlo is correct.  Art Wood on Dana Pretzer spoke about it Friday night before Beth arrived in Aruba.  So there was NO surprise interrogation.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Observer on December 03, 2007, 02:36:08 PM
Lala's, exactly.  That's why these drinks are only poured at closing time or when the guy is ready to take the girl away from the bar.  There is a narrow window of about 20 - 30 minutes before the girl is unconscious.

Thats why Deepak went out to his car after just 10-15 minutes after arriving to get ready for a quick departure. He saw the shot being poured or he got the nod from Joran and they were well aware the bar was closing in a few minutes and had it all timed perfectly. According to a witness they saw Deepak escorting Natalee out of C&C 10 minutes after the mass exit of patrons. If true then I can picture NH walking towards the car with Joran but realizing it wasn't a good idea and going back in where it felt safe and to look for friends but feeling heavily drugged. I can imagine Jk2 arguing over who would go back inside to get her. They knew in another 15 minutes she would be unconscious. It was all to easy as all Deepak had to watch out for was Natalee's friends when he escorted her back to his car.

They had something planned like a group rape,a video to show their conquest or some other event. The Kalpoes involvement in all of this wasn't just for Jorans benefit as they were in on it.IMO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 03, 2007, 02:57:33 PM
I know we're all praying for something positive to come....the candles burned out in gratefulness group, so I started them, again.  (when Mishy isnt putting it out in front of us, well, we forget...at least I did)

http://www.gratefulness.org/candles/candles.cfm?l=eng&gi=NAH



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 03, 2007, 03:18:48 PM
Joe T. on Court TV w/ Starr Jones...I can't watch it...I can't stand either one, lol.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2007, 03:25:04 PM
Joe T. on Court TV w/ Starr Jones...I can't watch it...I can't stand either one, lol.

Me neither.  Besides, I'm busy decorating my tree  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: vms on December 03, 2007, 03:30:31 PM
Joe T. on Court TV w/ Starr Jones...I can't watch it...I can't stand either one, lol.

Me neither.  Besides, I'm busy decorating my tree  :wink:
TJ Ward on now.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2007, 03:39:50 PM
Joe T. on Court TV w/ Starr Jones...I can't watch it...I can't stand either one, lol.

Me neither.  Besides, I'm busy decorating my tree  :wink:
TJ Ward on now.

Thanks VMS - let us know if anything new is said!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Silverfox on December 03, 2007, 03:40:04 PM
Let's see...

Two arrests... then a third... Two releases... but the third stays in jail

The Papa arrested before... then released ... then sues for compensation...

In a judicial review of the compensation suit some "new" evidence was presented and Papa was denied compensation because apparently the bench felt the state was justified in feeling and arresting him because the evidence points to a fact that he was involved in Nat's disappearance.

I have a feeling that this thing is going to get interesting.  My gut tells me they got Joran, and perhaps Papa too (albeit a more minor charge which would explain perhaps why he is not arrested now...yet)...

I also think the K2 will be rearrested and charged before the month is out... but really, don't you wonder if perhaps a "dutch deal" has been cut?  Maybe this is all window dressing and they agreed to testify against J and P and others and so they get out in the manner they did? 

And remember... there is still another drama being played in the background... one that I feel might have a legal nexus to this one... the separate "corruption" investigation.  Somehow I wonder if the two cases have a lot of common thread between them and that justice, and we all hope justice prevails, will be served in a much clearer light once Dutch authorities conclude the corruption investigation and begin making arrests.  I assume that such arrests will be "earth shaking" and potentially will bring a major part of the Aruban government down.

JMO.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Observer on December 03, 2007, 04:09:50 PM
the separate "corruption" investigation

I have never seen anywhere that they are actively Investigating the Corruption/Cover up in Natalee's case. Where do you see this? The Dutch have had this case for 16 months now and I have seen no clues they are gonna do anything about it. We know the Arubans certainly have no intentions of exposing anyone involved in the cover up.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: JA on December 03, 2007, 04:19:27 PM
As sick as it is, Deepak and Satish could have been along for the night to be voyuers (sp?).  They don't get the girls like Joran did and watching was better than not getting anything.  Maybe they stopped there, maybe they helped Joran with a difficult or stuggling Natalee when things turned sour, or maybe one or both took advantage of am unconscious or semi-conscious Natalee at Joran's prodding.

I think they knew ahead of time that Joran was going to drug a girl, and didn't think it was a big deal because they had done it before without any consequences.  They had had practice doing this and knew what situation was to their advantage.  Maybe before they found out what hotel the victim was staying at before, sexually assaulted them and then dropped them off in front of the hotel.  the victim either made it up to their room, or hotel staff found out where they belonged and got them there.  They are used to dealing with intoxicated tourists all the time.  That is one reason why they gave the hotel story.  It was what they usually did.  I think Natalee was convenient.  She was attractive and already intoxicated, making her the perfect victim.  She was with a large group, so she could easily taken away from the group.  Everyone would think she was with someone else.  They were probably all intoxicated at different levels, and safety on their last night probably was not a priority.  The vacation had gone well so far, why worry?

The boys know what happened to a certain level because Paulus had to get down what they were going to say to cover Joran.  By telling them that if they stick to this story no one will serve anytime is what 2K wanted to hear and beleive.  After all they probably thought, Paulus is an attorney and knows of these things.

Hopefully, they told what happened, and have accepted that they might have to serve a short sentence ( at least according to our standards!).  I hope someone got it through their skulls that Joran is only looking out for Joran.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Spock on December 03, 2007, 04:26:34 PM
the separate "corruption" investigation

I have never seen anywhere that they are actively Investigating the Corruption/Cover up in Natalee's case. Where do you see this? The Dutch have had this case for 16 months now and I have seen no clues they are gonna do anything about it. We know the Arubans certainly have no intentions of exposing anyone involved in the cover up.

Agreed, they will never expose the corruption. Mos' job is to prosecute the killing without exposing the coverup.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 03, 2007, 04:29:30 PM
Let's see...

Two arrests... then a third... Two releases... but the third stays in jail

The Papa arrested before... then released ... then sues for compensation...

In a judicial review of the compensation suit some "new" evidence was presented and Papa was denied compensation because apparently the bench felt the state was justified in feeling and arresting him because the evidence points to a fact that he was involved in Nat's disappearance.

I have a feeling that this thing is going to get interesting.  My gut tells me they got Joran, and perhaps Papa too (albeit a more minor charge which would explain perhaps why he is not arrested now...yet)...

I also think the K2 will be rearrested and charged before the month is out... but really, don't you wonder if perhaps a "dutch deal" has been cut?  Maybe this is all window dressing and they agreed to testify against J and P and others and so they get out in the manner they did? 

And remember... there is still another drama being played in the background... one that I feel might have a legal nexus to this one... the separate "corruption" investigation.  Somehow I wonder if the two cases have a lot of common thread between them and that justice, and we all hope justice prevails, will be served in a much clearer light once Dutch authorities conclude the corruption investigation and begin making arrests.  I assume that such arrests will be "earth shaking" and potentially will bring a major part of the Aruban government down.

JMO.

Thank you Silverfox... was it ever revealed what this 'new' evidences was?

"in a judicial review of the compensation suit some "new" evidence was presented and Papa was denied compensation because apparently the bench felt the state was justified in feeling and arresting him because the evidence points to a fact that he was involved in Nat's disappearance."  this is really confusing... :shock:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Spock on December 03, 2007, 04:34:04 PM
Here is an interesting point:

Mos does not need a Judges approval to charge the suspects with crimes. As I understand it, he charges them, and a trial panel of Judges will try them. The only thing the pretrial Judge can do is decide if the charges merit a pretrial detention. The pretrial Judge can not dismiss the charges.

The only thing stopping Mos from trying the case is Mos himself. I think the corruption is deep enough that he will not bring charges because he likes having a job.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 03, 2007, 04:36:48 PM
News in McCann case:
New witness again Robert Murat in the McCann case.

The new witness is the 20-years-old Charlotte Pennington.

Charlotte has told Newspaper the Sun, she has see Robert Murat, the night of disappear of Madeleine McCann at the apartment. Where Madeleine and her little twin brother and sister were sleeping that night.

NYC_lover ... I am confused.

Janet

++++++++++++++++++++


Kate McCann DID scream 'They've taken her' claims new nanny witness
By DAN NEWLING
Last updated at 16:41pm on
25th September 2007

The first eyewitness account of the frantic moments after Madeleine McCann disappeared can be revealed today.

Nanny Charlotte Pennington confirms that Kate McCann did scream: "They've taken her, they've taken her!"

<snipped>

Speaking publicly for the first time yesterday, she described Mrs McCann in the aftermath as "a broken woman" who was shuddering and unable to move.

"We are trained to comfort people in this type of situation but she was just inconsolable," she said.

Miss Pennington is considered a vital witness by Portuguese detectives with whom she spent more than four-and-a-half hours giving a statement.

She also claims British expat Robert Murat, the first suspect in the case, was in the area of the Ocean Club complex that night. He has repeatedly denied that he was there.

Talking from her mother's home in Leatherhead, Surrey, yesterday she told the Daily Mail: "I was in the apartment less than five minutes after they found that Madeleine had gone.

"When we were coming out we saw Kate and she was screaming: 'They've taken her, they've taken her!'

"I was standing right in front of her outside the apartment's back door, in the alleyway. I was very close to her. It might not have been the first thing she said. But she definitely said it.

"I was one of three Mark Warner staff who saw her shouting it. They have all given statements to the Portuguese police saying that."

The "they've taken her" version of events was first given in the Portuguese press two days after Madeleine disappeared on May 3.

http://cuttingthroughtherubbish.blogspot.com/2007/09/mccanns-new-witness-charlotte.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 03, 2007, 04:42:30 PM
the separate "corruption" investigation

I have never seen anywhere that they are actively Investigating the Corruption/Cover up in Natalee's case. Where do you see this? The Dutch have had this case for 16 months now and I have seen no clues they are gonna do anything about it. We know the Arubans certainly have no intentions of exposing anyone involved in the cover up.

I think this is as close as they ever came to it and we never heard results, if I am not mistaken.

People who talk a lot, have to stop talking and let the appropriate people talk
This according to the Minister of Justice after a question about Dompig’s declarations on Vanity Fair

DIARIO Aruba
12/07/2005

ORANJESTAD(AAN): During an interview with the Minister of Justice, the press asked the mandatory about the fact that an interview with Commissioner Dompig appeared in Vanity Fair, where he said that in the case of Natalee Holloway he arrested people to please the family.

Minister Croes said that there now is a tremendous Aruban prosecutor, who works in Curacao, who has just been asked to come to Aruba to give a hand, to do an independent investigation of the investigation which took place, where she will find all the documents.

According to Minister Croes, the Public Ministry [in Aruba] asked to work with them, however the Minister wants for her to do a completely, totally independent job, to help resolve the case and to detect where things went badly, for us to avoid them in the future.

The Minister said that he asks for people who talk too much, to stop talking a little, in order to let the appropriate people speak.


// posted by Getagrip @ 12/07/2005 11:46:00 PM
http://getagripmonkey.blogspot.com/2005_12_04_archive.html

~~~~~~~~~
It seems I remember a discussion on this at AL.com forums. Perhaps dennisintn remembers...?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 03, 2007, 04:43:54 PM
OOPS!  Wrong link.


Kate McCann DID scream 'They've taken her' claims new nanny witness
By DAN NEWLING
Last updated at 16:41pm on
25th September 2007

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=483715&in_page_id=1770&ct=5


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 03, 2007, 04:44:47 PM
http://justrepublic.wordpress.com/2006/07/
Aruba vs. Natalee et al.: Treating the Disease
To All Those Concerned:

When I look at the Natalee Holloway case I have more questions than answers. There are three things that standout more than anything though: (1) how could any human being hurt such a precious young woman, (2) why does the Aruban government insist on committing suicide and (3) where is Natalee? The first question I need go no further, because it happens all the time in acts carried out be depraved “human beings.” As for the second question it is either corruption or horrible public relations advice, finally that must be answered by both investigating the crime and the investigation.

The bad blood between Natalee’s family and the Aruban people is evident, and it is an ailment to all parties? These ailments as any that inflict human beings must be treated. What are the ailments and what is the appropriate treatment? I have selected six ailments in the case and am offering the appropriate treatment for each ailment. Remember the world we live in for better or worse is one where perception is truth. The best way to expose faulty perceptions is to bring it all into the light of day, and allow neutral parties to investigate all. This will require both the Aruban government and Natalee’s family to swallow their pride.

Ailment: Is Aruba’s government corrupt?
Millions of American’s perceive this to be true.
Treatment: A full investigation of the investigation by authorities from Holland and the US.

Ailment: Did Natalee’s family hinder the investigation?
Many Arubans’ perceive this to be true.
Treatment: A full investigation of the investigation by authorities from Holland and the US.

Ailement: What happened to Natalee?
Millions of Americans know that the Van der Sloots know and perceive that government officials of Aruba know.
Treatment: A new investigation by officials from Holland and US authorities, with no Aruban involvement.

Ailment: The boycott of Aruba.
Millions of Americans perceive this boycott as just and Arubans perceive it as unjust.
Treatment: In exchange for the above concessions, the boycott of Aruba should be called off.

Ailment: Crimes not prosecuted.
Millions of Americans perceive that many crimes related to the abduction and investigation in this case have not been prosecuted.
Treatment: Any crime including, but not limited to lying, as a witness should be prosecuted immediately.

Ailment: Did Natalee’s family misappropriate funds?
Many Arubans perceive this to be true.
Treatment: They should provide an open accounting of any accounts created on behalf of Natalee’s case, and the appropriations of said funds.

The aforementioned steps may to some degree reduce the tension between the parties. It requires both parties to act in an open manner, and perhaps see the true light. I am one who believes that if there is nothing to hide, then bring it into the light and you will be vindicated. However, at times a struggle can escalate as it has here where people will do anything just to spite the other side. Natalee’s family having nothing to hide should have no problem with opening the books, and the Aruban government with nothing to hide should not have a problem being investigated. A joint investigation by Holland and the US of the investigation that concludes it was conducted in a professional and just manner will go along way to restoring Aruba’s reputation. More than any amount of money spent on advertising will ever do.

These measures of compromise would restore faith to the truth and justice seeking party, and bring a murky problem into a clearer light. It is my belief that whoever declines such a compromise could only be guilty of wrongdoing. Any endeavor undertaken by human beings is not perfect; as such, mistakes are acceptable to a degree. A transparent process brings those mistakes into light and insures that all have acted, according to appropriate procedures.

This proposal of reconciliation should be accepted in the name of the truth and justice. It will help Natalee’s family find the truth and clear the perceived corruption of the Aruban government.

Sincerely,

“Mr. Justice”

July 25, 2006 Posted by Mr. Justice



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: NYC_lover on December 03, 2007, 04:48:22 PM
News in McCann case:
New witness again Robert Murat in the McCann case.

The new witness is the 20-years-old Charlotte Pennington.

Charlotte has told Newspaper the Sun, she has see Robert Murat, the night of disappear of Madeleine McCann at the apartment. Where Madeleine and her little twin brother and sister were sleeping that night.

NYC_lover ... I am confused.

Janet

++++++++++++++++++++


Kate McCann DID scream 'They've taken her' claims new nanny witness
By DAN NEWLING
Last updated at 16:41pm on
25th September 2007

The first eyewitness account of the frantic moments after Madeleine McCann disappeared can be revealed today.

Nanny Charlotte Pennington confirms that Kate McCann did scream: "They've taken her, they've taken her!"

http://cuttingthroughtherubbish.blogspot.com/2007/09/mccanns-new-witness-charlotte.html

Tamikosmom - this case is a really trouble case, police rapports with many suspects: Mommy, Daddy, Robert Murat, Robert Murat his girlfriend and more suspects.
I had read the article in De Telegraaf, there is stay there is a second towel found. The second towel is found in a barn. Probably is the first towel, where they also have spoken about, found by De Telegraaf news reports in the area, where the Dutch tip person was talking about. I have more write about this case in my blogspot.... see the link in my signature.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 03, 2007, 04:50:37 PM
 Sorry if this has already been posted....if not hopefully someone can translate it

http://www.bondia.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=512&Itemid=1http://www.bondia.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=512&Itemid=1http://www.bondia.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=512&Itemid=1Beth Twitty a keda interoga pa mas di 4 ora diasabra mainta 
Monday, 03 December 2007 


Autoridad a sorprende nan despues di nan ‘combersacion cu Fiscal’


ORANJESTAD – Mama di Natalee Holloway, Beth Holloway a haye cu un sorpresa desagradabel den fin di siman ora cu e la haye ta wordo interoga pa recherche di Hulanda y Aruba diasabra mainta pa mas di 4 ora largo. Algo cu sigur Twitty no a spera cu e lo mester a pasa aden. Na final, un Beth Twitty hopi disgusta y visiblemente rabia, a nenga di duna comentario na Bon Dia Aruba ora cu el a bandona warda di polis, acompańa pa su Abogado mericano John Q. Kelly.
Manera cu Bon Dia Aruba a raporta caba, Beth Twitty y Dave Holloway a haci un peticion na Fiscal Hans Mos, pa reuni cu nan pa asina por tin un intercambio di informacion rond di e investigacion riba e desaparicio di su yiu muher Natalee. Algo cu Mos a bai di acuerdo cune. “Nos debe e famia un splicacion di kico nos ta haciendo. E ta un caso lamentabel y tristo y nan tin derecho riba informacion. Esei nos ta bai duna nan tambe. Informacion riba e caso” Mos a declara ainda na prensa diabierna atardi laat despues cu a bira conoci cu nan a perde nan caso contra rumannan Kalpoe cu diasabra a recobra nan libertad.

Loke cu Twitty no tabata sa ta cu autoridad local tabatin otro intencion acerca. Esta cu lo a interoga e mama y posiblemente e tata tambe, unabes cu nan caba cu nan session di ‘informacion’.

E intencion tabata cu lo a warda riba Twitty na edificio di Ministerio Publico pa 8’or y mei diasabra mainta. Esaki pues tabata e plan cu autoridad tabata kier pa tur hende tin. Pero en realidad e plan tabata otro. A dicidi cu ta cambia localidad y ta topa e mayornan di Natalee Holloway na warda di polis na Playa enves di Ministerio Publico.
Pues tabata ya den careda di 8’or y algo cu por a nota presencia caba di Fiscal Dop Kruimel cu a yega warda di polis prome y a drenta di e porta di dilanti. Despues a sigui yegada di Fiscal Mayor Hans Mos cu tambe a drenta warda di polis pero e la opta pa drenta for di patras, hincando su auto prome den e parkeerplaats paden y drenta di porta di banda.

Mester nota cu e unico medio local presente pa cubri esaki tabata Bon Dia Aruba cu a haci su investigacion necesario y a logra haya e informacion necesario. Aki a sigui e parti di wardamento riba e famia Twitty, pasobra a kere cu cos a cambia, ya cu ningun hende tabata aparece.

Diripiente mei ora mas laat cu programa, den careda di 9’or di mainta a aparece un grupito di 6 pa 7 persona cu a cruza caya banda di Cuba’s Cooking y drenta warda di polis for di porta principal, esta dilanti. Entre e grupo aki a nota presencia di Beth Twitty den jeans y camisa blauw, sigui pa su Abogado mericano John Q. Kelly cu tambe tabata bisti hopi casual y a drenta cu un cara serio den warda di polis. E momento ei ainda nan no tabata sa kico e plan tabata.

Despues di mas of menos un ora y algo, a nota salida di tanto fiscal Kruimel como Mos, mientras cu keto bai Twitty y delegacion tabata paden. A dura mas di 5 ora despues ora cu diripiente Twitty y delegacion a bandona warda di polis for di porta di dilanti, rabia y a nenga di duna declaracion na prensa. Despues a drenta nan auto y a bandona e sitio. Bon Dia Aruba tabatin conocemento di e plan aki delanta, pero no por a divulga nada pa no trece e plan di autoridad na peliger. Y por nota cu e plan lo a funciona, aunke no a logra haya comentario si di Twitty y tampoco Fiscal riba con nan parti a bai den e caso aki. Riba combinacion di potretnan por a haya un impresion di e momentonan di movesion dilanti di Warda di Polis di Playa.
 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: NYC_lover on December 03, 2007, 04:52:57 PM
Sorry if this has already been posted....if not hopefully someone can translate it

http://www.bondia.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=512&Itemid=1http://www.bondia.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=512&Itemid=1http://www.bondia.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=512&Itemid=1Beth Twitty a keda interoga pa mas di 4 ora diasabra mainta 
Monday, 03 December 2007 


Autoridad a sorprende nan despues di nan ‘combersacion cu Fiscal’


ORANJESTAD – Mama di Natalee Holloway, Beth Holloway a haye cu un sorpresa desagradabel den fin di siman ora cu e la haye ta wordo interoga pa recherche di Hulanda y Aruba diasabra mainta pa mas di 4 ora largo. Algo cu sigur Twitty no a spera cu e lo mester a pasa aden. Na final, un Beth Twitty hopi disgusta y visiblemente rabia, a nenga di duna comentario na Bon Dia Aruba ora cu el a bandona warda di polis, acompańa pa su Abogado mericano John Q. Kelly.
Manera cu Bon Dia Aruba a raporta caba, Beth Twitty y Dave Holloway a haci un peticion na Fiscal Hans Mos, pa reuni cu nan pa asina por tin un intercambio di informacion rond di e investigacion riba e desaparicio di su yiu muher Natalee. Algo cu Mos a bai di acuerdo cune. “Nos debe e famia un splicacion di kico nos ta haciendo. E ta un caso lamentabel y tristo y nan tin derecho riba informacion. Esei nos ta bai duna nan tambe. Informacion riba e caso” Mos a declara ainda na prensa diabierna atardi laat despues cu a bira conoci cu nan a perde nan caso contra rumannan Kalpoe cu diasabra a recobra nan libertad.

Loke cu Twitty no tabata sa ta cu autoridad local tabatin otro intencion acerca. Esta cu lo a interoga e mama y posiblemente e tata tambe, unabes cu nan caba cu nan session di ‘informacion’.

E intencion tabata cu lo a warda riba Twitty na edificio di Ministerio Publico pa 8’or y mei diasabra mainta. Esaki pues tabata e plan cu autoridad tabata kier pa tur hende tin. Pero en realidad e plan tabata otro. A dicidi cu ta cambia localidad y ta topa e mayornan di Natalee Holloway na warda di polis na Playa enves di Ministerio Publico.
Pues tabata ya den careda di 8’or y algo cu por a nota presencia caba di Fiscal Dop Kruimel cu a yega warda di polis prome y a drenta di e porta di dilanti. Despues a sigui yegada di Fiscal Mayor Hans Mos cu tambe a drenta warda di polis pero e la opta pa drenta for di patras, hincando su auto prome den e parkeerplaats paden y drenta di porta di banda.

Mester nota cu e unico medio local presente pa cubri esaki tabata Bon Dia Aruba cu a haci su investigacion necesario y a logra haya e informacion necesario. Aki a sigui e parti di wardamento riba e famia Twitty, pasobra a kere cu cos a cambia, ya cu ningun hende tabata aparece.

Diripiente mei ora mas laat cu programa, den careda di 9’or di mainta a aparece un grupito di 6 pa 7 persona cu a cruza caya banda di Cuba’s Cooking y drenta warda di polis for di porta principal, esta dilanti. Entre e grupo aki a nota presencia di Beth Twitty den jeans y camisa blauw, sigui pa su Abogado mericano John Q. Kelly cu tambe tabata bisti hopi casual y a drenta cu un cara serio den warda di polis. E momento ei ainda nan no tabata sa kico e plan tabata.

Despues di mas of menos un ora y algo, a nota salida di tanto fiscal Kruimel como Mos, mientras cu keto bai Twitty y delegacion tabata paden. A dura mas di 5 ora despues ora cu diripiente Twitty y delegacion a bandona warda di polis for di porta di dilanti, rabia y a nenga di duna declaracion na prensa. Despues a drenta nan auto y a bandona e sitio. Bon Dia Aruba tabatin conocemento di e plan aki delanta, pero no por a divulga nada pa no trece e plan di autoridad na peliger. Y por nota cu e plan lo a funciona, aunke no a logra haya comentario si di Twitty y tampoco Fiscal riba con nan parti a bai den e caso aki. Riba combinacion di potretnan por a haya un impresion di e momentonan di movesion dilanti di Warda di Polis di Playa.
 


Sure!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 03, 2007, 04:53:35 PM
LOL Sunny...I was just getting ready to post that  :P


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 03, 2007, 04:57:17 PM
LOL Sunny...I was just getting ready to post that  :P

oooppsssss sorry...back to lurking for me.... :silent:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2007, 04:57:38 PM
Same Bondia article 12/3/07:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/01a.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Silverfox on December 03, 2007, 04:58:18 PM
the separate "corruption" investigation

I have never seen anywhere that they are actively Investigating the Corruption/Cover up in Natalee's case. Where do you see this? The Dutch have had this case for 16 months now and I have seen no clues they are gonna do anything about it. We know the Arubans certainly have no intentions of exposing anyone involved in the cover up.

There is a separate "corruption" investigation going on concerning the government itself.  When the Dutch Investigators were on Aruba  it was said that they were involved in two separate investigations -- one a corruption investigation involving land deals and casinos, and the second one involving Nat.  I have often felt that there might be a connection between the two separate and distinct investigation.  That the Nat cover-up might very well be a small result of a much bigger issue.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 03, 2007, 04:58:33 PM
LOL Sunny...I was just getting ready to post that  :P

i tried it through the translation site on line and it was gibberish to me..so I didn't bother to post that...hope fully some one can.....there is also a picture of Beth and JQ on that site


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: blah on December 03, 2007, 04:59:11 PM
the separate "corruption" investigation

I have never seen anywhere that they are actively Investigating the Corruption/Cover up in Natalee's case. Where do you see this? The Dutch have had this case for 16 months now and I have seen no clues they are gonna do anything about it. We know the Arubans certainly have no intentions of exposing anyone involved in the cover up.

Agreed, they will never expose the corruption. Mos' job is to prosecute the killing without exposing the coverup.

I believe this is probably the most likely scenario also


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 03, 2007, 04:59:47 PM
Same Bondia article 12/3/07:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/01a.jpg)

thanks klaas.....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on December 03, 2007, 05:03:37 PM
the separate "corruption" investigation

I have never seen anywhere that they are actively Investigating the Corruption/Cover up in Natalee's case. Where do you see this? The Dutch have had this case for 16 months now and I have seen no clues they are gonna do anything about it. We know the Arubans certainly have no intentions of exposing anyone involved in the cover up.

I think this is as close as they ever came to it and we never heard results, if I am not mistaken.

People who talk a lot, have to stop talking and let the appropriate people talk
This according to the Minister of Justice after a question about Dompig’s declarations on Vanity Fair

DIARIO Aruba
12/07/2005

ORANJESTAD(AAN): During an interview with the Minister of Justice, the press asked the mandatory about the fact that an interview with Commissioner Dompig appeared in Vanity Fair, where he said that in the case of Natalee Holloway he arrested people to please the family.

Minister Croes said that there now is a tremendous Aruban prosecutor, who works in Curacao, who has just been asked to come to Aruba to give a hand, to do an independent investigation of the investigation which took place, where she will find all the documents.

According to Minister Croes, the Public Ministry [in Aruba] asked to work with them, however the Minister wants for her to do a completely, totally independent job, to help resolve the case and to detect where things went badly, for us to avoid them in the future.

The Minister said that he asks for people who talk too much, to stop talking a little, in order to let the appropriate people speak.


// posted by Getagrip @ 12/07/2005 11:46:00 PM
http://getagripmonkey.blogspot.com/2005_12_04_archive.html

~~~~~~~~~
It seems I remember a discussion on this at AL.com forums. Perhaps dennisintn remembers...?


Thanks for posting that Nut. It rings hollow similar to the Arubans bringing in Dutch judges from Curacao as purportedly being non-biased. Yeah right. Like Judge Wit, who stifled the investigation? We are supposed to trust any government official in Curacao? Not a chance.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: NYC_lover on December 03, 2007, 05:05:45 PM
Sorry if this has already been posted....if not hopefully someone can translate it

http://www.bondia.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=512&Itemid=1http://www.bondia.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=512&Itemid=1http://www.bondia.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=512&Itemid=1Beth Twitty a keda interoga pa mas di 4 ora diasabra mainta 
Monday, 03 December 2007 


Sure!

With shortly words, it goes about the meeting with Hans Mos and Dop Kruimel.

Translation:
oranjestad – mother of natalee holloway, beth holloway owing to haye with one surprise bleak in end of week hour with the la haye is wordo interoga for investigators of the netherlands and aruba saturday morning for more of 4 hour largo. algo with assure twitty not owing to wait for with the will have to owing to happen inside. at end, one beth twitty much disgusta and visiblemente angry, owing to deny of give comentario at good morning aruba hour with past owing to bandona keep of police, acompańa for his lawyer john q. kelly. as with good morning aruba owing to raporta end, beth twitty and dave holloway owing to haci one peticion at fiscal hans mos, for reuni with they for so can have one intercambio of information around of the investigation on the description of his child murder natalee. algo with mos owing to go of acuerdo cune. “nos owe the family one splicacion of kico we is haciendo. the is one case regrettable and tristo and they have derecho on information. that we is go give they also. information on the case” mos owing to declara still at prensa diabierna nightfall late after with owing to become conoci with they owing to lose they case contra rumannan kalpoe with saturday owing to recobra they freedom. thing with twitty not was know is with autoridad local had another intencion acerca. esta with will owing to interoga the mother and posiblemente the father also, unabes with they end with they session of ‘informacion’. the intencion was cu will owing to keep on twitty at edificio of ministery public for 8’ and half saturday morning. this then was the plan with autoridad was wanted for everybody have. but provided that realidad the plan was another. owing to dicidi with is change localidad and is come across the parents of natalee holloway at keep of police at beach enves of ministery public. then was already in careda of 8’ and algo with can owing to notice presencia end of fiscal dop kruimel with owing to arrive keep of police first and owing to enter of the door of fast. after owing to follow arrival of fiscal parent hans mos with also owing to enter keep of police but the la opta for enter for of behind, hincando his car first in the carplace inside and enter of door of near. have to notice with the unique media local present for cubri this was good morning aruba with owing to haci his investigacion necesario and owing to succeed achieve the informacion necesario. here owing to follow the part of wardamento on the family twitty, because owing to believe with cos owing to change, already with none person was aparece. diripiente half hour more late with declaration of policy, in careda of 9 of morning owing to aparece one grupito of 6 for 7 person with owing to cruza caya near of cuba’s cooking and enter keep of police for of door principal, esta fast. among the are here owing to notice presencia of beth twitty in jeans y camisa blauw, follow for his advocate mericano john q. kelly with also was dress much casual y owing to enter with one cara earnest in keep of police. the instant there still they not was know kico the plan was. after of more or less one hour and algo, owing to notice exit of tanto fiscal kruimel because; mos, while with keto go twitty and delegacion was inside. owing to last more of 5 hour after hour with diripiente twitty and delegacion owing to bandona keep of police for of door of fast, angry and owing to deny of give declaracion at prensa. after owing to enter they car and owing to bandona the sitio. good morning aruba had conocemento of the plan here delanta, but not can owing to divulga nothing for not trece the plan of autoridad at danger. and can notice with the plan will owing to funciona, although not owing to succeed achieve comentario if of twitty and niether fiscal on con they part owing to go in the case here. on combination of potretnan can owing to achieve one impresion of the momentonan of movesion fast of keep of police of beach. come across


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: blah on December 03, 2007, 05:09:47 PM
Same Bondia article 12/3/07:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/01a.jpg)

well, they sure dont look happy at all.

and the guy with his back to the camera and even bring himself to look at her, WTF


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2007, 05:12:22 PM
Blah - keep in mind who is associated with Bondia via ArubaToday (Julia Renfro).  We don't know if that photo was taken before the meeting or after.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 03, 2007, 05:13:18 PM
Sorry if this has already been posted....if not hopefully someone can translate it

http://www.bondia.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=512&Itemid=1http://www.bondia.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=512&Itemid=1http://www.bondia.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=512&Itemid=1Beth Twitty a keda interoga pa mas di 4 ora diasabra mainta 
Monday, 03 December 2007 


Sure!

With shortly words, it goes about the meeting with Hans Mos and Dop Kruimel.

Translation:
oranjestad – mother of natalee holloway, beth holloway owing to haye with one surprise bleak in end of week hour with the la haye is wordo interoga for investigators of the netherlands and aruba saturday morning for more of 4 hour largo. algo with assure twitty not owing to wait for with the will have to owing to happen inside. at end, one beth twitty much disgusta and visiblemente angry, owing to deny of give comentario at good morning aruba hour with past owing to bandona keep of police, acompańa for his lawyer john q. kelly. as with good morning aruba owing to raporta end, beth twitty and dave holloway owing to haci one peticion at fiscal hans mos, for reuni with they for so can have one intercambio of information around of the investigation on the description of his child murder natalee. algo with mos owing to go of acuerdo cune. “nos owe the family one splicacion of kico we is haciendo. the is one case regrettable and tristo and they have derecho on information. that we is go give they also. information on the case” mos owing to declara still at prensa diabierna nightfall late after with owing to become conoci with they owing to lose they case contra rumannan kalpoe with saturday owing to recobra they freedom. thing with twitty not was know is with autoridad local had another intencion acerca. esta with will owing to interoga the mother and posiblemente the father also, unabes with they end with they session of ‘informacion’. the intencion was cu will owing to keep on twitty at edificio of ministery public for 8’ and half saturday morning. this then was the plan with autoridad was wanted for everybody have. but provided that realidad the plan was another. owing to dicidi with is change localidad and is come across the parents of natalee holloway at keep of police at beach enves of ministery public. then was already in careda of 8’ and algo with can owing to notice presencia end of fiscal dop kruimel with owing to arrive keep of police first and owing to enter of the door of fast. after owing to follow arrival of fiscal parent hans mos with also owing to enter keep of police but the la opta for enter for of behind, hincando his car first in the carplace inside and enter of door of near. have to notice with the unique media local present for cubri this was good morning aruba with owing to haci his investigacion necesario and owing to succeed achieve the informacion necesario. here owing to follow the part of wardamento on the family twitty, because owing to believe with cos owing to change, already with none person was aparece. diripiente half hour more late with declaration of policy, in careda of 9 of morning owing to aparece one grupito of 6 for 7 person with owing to cruza caya near of cuba’s cooking and enter keep of police for of door principal, esta fast. among the are here owing to notice presencia of beth twitty in jeans y camisa blauw, follow for his advocate mericano john q. kelly with also was dress much casual y owing to enter with one cara earnest in keep of police. the instant there still they not was know kico the plan was. after of more or less one hour and algo, owing to notice exit of tanto fiscal kruimel because; mos, while with keto go twitty and delegacion was inside. owing to last more of 5 hour after hour with diripiente twitty and delegacion owing to bandona keep of police for of door of fast, angry and owing to deny of give declaracion at prensa. after owing to enter they car and owing to bandona the sitio. good morning aruba had conocemento of the plan here delanta, but not can owing to divulga nothing for not trece the plan of autoridad at danger. and can notice with the plan will owing to funciona, although not owing to succeed achieve comentario if of twitty and niether fiscal on con they part owing to go in the case here. on combination of potretnan can owing to achieve one impresion of the momentonan of movesion fast of keep of police of beach. come across

thanks NYC....much appreciated


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: blah on December 03, 2007, 05:15:47 PM
Blah - keep in mind who is associated with Bondia via ArubaToday (Julia Renfro).  We don't know if that photo was taken before the meeting or after.

good point.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Observer on December 03, 2007, 05:17:46 PM
I think its been a huge game of smoke and mirrors,all talk and pure BS coming out of Aruba since June 2005. Rudy Croes never had any intentions of looking into anything because he's in the middle of it. When they aren't shifting key officials in and out they are playing the blame game. However nothing is ever done and dirty cops like Van Der Straaten retires...err umm takes over as Police Commish in Bonaire and Narcotics Officer Dennis Jacobs continues to be lead Investigator for almost 2 more years.


Investigation of the Police Force is not necessary
by A.M. Digital

Posted: Jul 9, 2005 18:10 UTC

ORANJESTAD - The Natalee Holloway case certainly has Aruba upside down. There is a lot of pressure on the Government and on the investigating team.

According to Eric Zaandam, president of the Police union SPA, it is unfortunate that the case has not yet been solved, but more unfortunate are the negative expressions towards the police force by amongst others the Minister of Justice, Rudy Croes, and by Prime Minister Nelson Oduber.

“This is to regretted because, instead of receiving support our own Government dignitaries express themselves negatively about the police” said Zaandam. “Minister Rudy Croes even mentioned that he will bring in a police team from Curaçao to investigate their colleagues in Aruba.”

Eric Zaandam wishes for the Minister of Justice to understand once and for all that the investigating team is responsible and has to report to the Public Prosecutor, and this happens all the time. The investigating team has no obligation to report to anybody else, including the Minister of Justice. The Minister may well bring any team from abroad but the Aruba Police Force will not report to any team.

Those that wish to have information will have to knock on the door at the Public Prosecutor’s office and not interrogate any member of the investigating team, according to the union leader. Minister Croes should not try to play the police forces of other islands against the Aruba police force.

SPA learned of the intentions of the Aruba Minister of Justice when they were in Surinam to commemorate 100 years of existence of the Surinam police force. Here they advised their colleague from the Netherlands Antilles not to fall in the trap of the Aruba Minister. SPA also contacted the Netherlands Antillean Police Union on the matter.

If the Aruba Minister of Justice wants information, he will have to approach the Public Prosecutor, and not accuse any member of the investigating team of leaking information. The investigating team did not commit any crime and an investigation is not necessary.

“The Aruba Police have already cooperated with all the teams that wished to help with the investigation of the disappearance of Natalee Holloway, except Scotland Yard” said Zaandam.

In police circles it is already agreed that they will not collaborate with any team that comes in to investigate the investigating team of the Natalee Holloway case.

http://news.caribseek.com/set-up/exec/view.cgi?archive=72&num=16771


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: blah on December 03, 2007, 05:17:48 PM
has Red or anyone talked to her since the meeting?  Anyone heard the tone of her voice since the meeting??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on December 03, 2007, 05:17:53 PM
Here is an interesting point:

Mos does not need a Judges approval to charge the suspects with crimes. As I understand it, he charges them, and a trial panel of Judges will try them. The only thing the pretrial Judge can do is decide if the charges merit a pretrial detention. The pretrial Judge can not dismiss the charges.

The only thing stopping Mos from trying the case is Mos himself. I think the corruption is deep enough that he will not bring charges because he likes having a job.


If so he hasn't done Aruba a service, Spock. The prosecution of the three Amigos and Paulus would go far to alleviate Aruba's image problems, but this same drugging, raping, and murder will re-occur unless they fix the big problem that caused this in the first place. If they had simply followed the rules and prosecuted Natalee's case like they should have I daresay their tourism and public image would have hardly been affected. The cover-up is what has gotten the island in the trouble it is in.

There's that saying in legal and political circles, "It's not the crime, it's the cover-up." If they don't fix their government and get rid of the Dutch and Aruban corruption they are doomed to repeat themselves. It would also help if they curbed the open sale of drugs and threw the predators that use them on innocent tourist women in prison. Their problem is three-fold: corruption, drugs and local male predators.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: blah on December 03, 2007, 05:20:26 PM
Does Mos have any plan to interrogate Dick Cheney?


 :lol: :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2007, 05:21:23 PM
has Red or anyone talked to her since the meeting?  Anyone heard the tone of her voice since the meeting??

Not sure.  I know Red has a call into her.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2007, 05:22:18 PM
Does Mos have any plan to interrogate Dick Cheney?


 :lol: :lol:

No but I hear he wants to detain Obama  :D


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on December 03, 2007, 05:23:46 PM
I think its been a huge game of smoke and mirrors,all talk and pure BS coming out of Aruba since June 2005. Rudy Croes never had any intentions of looking into anything because he's in the middle of it.


Investigation of the Police Force is not necessary
by A.M. Digital

Posted: Jul 9, 2005 18:10 UTC

ORANJESTAD - The Natalee Holloway case certainly has Aruba upside down. There is a lot of pressure on the Government and on the investigating team.

According to Eric Zaandam, president of the Police union SPA, it is unfortunate that the case has not yet been solved, but more unfortunate are the negative expressions towards the police force by amongst others the Minister of Justice, Rudy Croes, and by Prime Minister Nelson Oduber.

“This is to regretted because, instead of receiving support our own Government dignitaries express themselves negatively about the police” said Zaandam. “Minister Rudy Croes even mentioned that he will bring in a police team from Curaçao to investigate their colleagues in Aruba.”

Snipped

“The Aruba Police have already cooperated with all the teams that wished to help with the investigation of the disappearance of Natalee Holloway, except Scotland Yard” said Zaandam.

In police circles it is already agreed that they will not collaborate with any team that comes in to investigate the investigating team of the Natalee Holloway case.

http://news.caribseek.com/set-up/exec/view.cgi?archive=72&num=16771


What a farce. We now know they gave the FBI nothing, squeezed them out. This Zaandam is one of the first guys they should be investigating, he is running a clear misinformation campaign.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: blah on December 03, 2007, 05:24:09 PM
Does Mos have any plan to interrogate Dick Cheney?


 :lol: :lol:

No but I hear he wants to detain Obama  :D

oh yes, it all makes sense now.  Barack Obama did it with the help of Condi Rice and a band of pygmies

 :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Spock on December 03, 2007, 05:34:24 PM
Here is an interesting point:

Mos does not need a Judges approval to charge the suspects with crimes. As I understand it, he charges them, and a trial panel of Judges will try them. The only thing the pretrial Judge can do is decide if the charges merit a pretrial detention. The pretrial Judge can not dismiss the charges.

The only thing stopping Mos from trying the case is Mos himself. I think the corruption is deep enough that he will not bring charges because he likes having a job.


If so he hasn't done Aruba a service, Spock. The prosecution of the three Amigos and Paulus would go far to alleviate Aruba's image problems, but this same drugging, raping, and murder will re-occur unless they fix the big problem that caused this in the first place. If they had simply followed the rules and prosecuted Natalee's case like they should have I daresay their tourism and public image would have hardly been affected. The cover-up is what has gotten the island in the trouble it is in.

There's that saying in legal and political circles, "It's not the crime, it's the cover-up." If they don't fix their government and get rid of the Dutch and Aruban corruption they are doomed to repeat themselves. It would also help if they curbed the open sale of drugs and threw the predators that use them on innocent tourist women in prison. Their problem is three-fold: corruption, drugs and local male predators.

I agree with you, but my point was Mos doesnt need anyone's approval to take the suspects to trial. If he wants a trial, he gets one. The problem is, his boss, the Minister of Justice, wants the case closed, and no trial. Now , if he likes his job and his position in govenment, what do you think he will do?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: blah on December 03, 2007, 05:35:10 PM
is Taco in Aruba yet or was he just blowing hot air about going down there?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: NYC_lover on December 03, 2007, 05:36:42 PM
thanks NYC....much appreciated
You are welcome SunnyinTX.... and yes I know it was much.  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2007, 05:36:53 PM
Posted by the witch at RU:

Glenda wrote:

Yes, I can clear this up. Beth and JQK walked into the Prosecutors office on their own accord. I don't know if it was Beth's nervousness or JQK's "wildzang" that made them 1/2 late to their meeting. 


Or maybe the traffic?  Certainly there was an accident, there always is  :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: blah on December 03, 2007, 05:39:05 PM
Posted by the witch at RU:

Glenda wrote:

Yes, I can clear this up. Beth and JQK walked into the Prosecutors office on their own accord. I don't know if it was Beth's nervousness or JQK's "wildzang" that made them 1/2 late to their meeting. 


Or maybe the traffic?  Certainly there was an accident, there always is  :roll:

I heard from a reliable source that if you get there too early, you have to wait for them to finish their cornflakes.


And morning cartoons.


 :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 03, 2007, 05:39:15 PM
is Taco in Aruba yet or was he just blowing hot air about going down there?


Wed. I think...to get Joran out early, lmao.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Spock on December 03, 2007, 05:43:07 PM
is Taco in Aruba yet or was he just blowing hot air about going down there?

If Taco is going there, its a sure sign Joran is getting out. Taco wants all the PR he can get.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: nonesuche on December 03, 2007, 05:45:19 PM
Posted by the witch at RU:

Glenda wrote:

Yes, I can clear this up. Beth and JQK walked into the Prosecutors office on their own accord. I don't know if it was Beth's nervousness or JQK's "wildzang" that made them 1/2 late to their meeting. 


Or maybe the traffic?  Certainly there was an accident, there always is  :roll:

I hope everyone notices that RenHO cannot ever make just a simple post that is professional or non-reactive, she always has to interject some malice or a snide comment.

This is the hallmark of an unprofessional and one with significant immaturity, really telling and it appears Renho has never progressed emotionally beyond junior high  :roll:

FYI Renho, don't you think Beth looks lovely? Why would JKelly smile, I think Renho continues to show how limited her experience is within professional practices.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Observer on December 03, 2007, 05:46:01 PM
(http://img62.imageshack.us/img62/9307/diazs1.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: blah on December 03, 2007, 05:46:18 PM
is Taco in Aruba yet or was he just blowing hot air about going down there?


Wed. I think...to get Joran out early, lmao.

whats he going to do, try and impress someone with his lack of knowledge of the facts in this case?

maybe they are having an idiot contest this week and he was invited as a guest speaker?





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: blah on December 03, 2007, 05:48:24 PM
is Taco in Aruba yet or was he just blowing hot air about going down there?

If Taco is going there, its a sure sign Joran is getting out. Taco wants all the PR he can get.

this is probably the case.  They are gonna cut the killer loose and he is going to take all the credit for it.  Cant get enough of that TeeVee time  :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 03, 2007, 05:48:40 PM
Posted by the witch at RU:

Glenda wrote:

Yes, I can clear this up. Beth and JQK walked into the Prosecutors office on their own accord. I don't know if it was Beth's nervousness or JQK's "wildzang" that made them 1/2 late to their meeting. 


Or maybe the traffic?  Certainly there was an accident, there always is  :roll:

as usual she doesn't know jackchit.....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 03, 2007, 05:51:17 PM
Jenna at RU has gone overe the edge. Here are a few of her most recent Topics on Natalees board.

"Valero gas station/ Antraco copying passport"
"Human trafficking ring from Venezuela"
"An undercover mission commissioned by somebody in the US gov"
"Marijuana laced with cocaine or crack"
"OAS-Ft. Lauderdale, Bolivia, Natalee, and Human Trafficking"


wish she would make up her mind..... :roll:




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 03, 2007, 05:51:51 PM
(http://img62.imageshack.us/img62/9307/diazs1.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)


thanks *******...these past 2 1/2 years have not been kind to them physically.....tacoboy needs to stop referring to any of them as boys.....ggggrrrrrrr


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: blah on December 03, 2007, 05:52:19 PM
Do we know if Joran is missing any classes during is stay in Aruba?

I thought he was supposed to be going to school over there in the Netherlands?

You would think if he were really in school over there that Taco would be screaming from the rooftops about how this is a burden on his education.  He NEVER misses an opportunity to portray Joran as the victim.  I have not heard anyone mention all the classes he is missing because of this "detention" :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 03, 2007, 05:53:22 PM
Jenna at RU has gone overe the edge. Here are a few of her most recent Topics on Natalees board.

"Valero gas station/ Antraco copying passport"
"Human trafficking ring from Venezuela"
"An undercover mission commissioned by somebody in the US gov"
"Marijuana laced with cocaine or crack"
"OAS-Ft. Lauderdale, Bolivia, Natalee, and Human Trafficking"


wish she would make up her mind..... :roll:

LOL...Nut, did you wear your tin foil hat when you ventured over there :shock:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 03, 2007, 05:54:33 PM
Please don't flame me, but I think Deepak looks better than he did in 2005.
Joran looks plain old tired.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 03, 2007, 05:55:13 PM
Do we know if Joran is missing any classes during is stay in Aruba?

I thought he was supposed to be going to school over there in the Netherlands?

You would think if he were really in school over there that Taco would be screaming from the rooftops about how this is a burden on his education.  He NEVER misses an opportunity to portray Joran as the victim.  I have not heard anyone mention all the classes he is missing because of this "detention" :roll:

ROTFLMAO....betcha in the next day or so he does exactly this....one of his 'fans' will mention he /she saw it on SM!  LOL


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: NYC_lover on December 03, 2007, 05:55:23 PM
I have to go for sleeping, I see you all tomorrow. Have a great evening!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 03, 2007, 05:56:38 PM
Please don't flame me, but I think Deepak looks better than he did in 2005.
Joran looks plain old tired.

LOL...no flaming.....they look like the devil to me....his face is fuller.....joran looks like to many night of drugs and drinking.....wonder if he is going through withdrawals in jail


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: blah on December 03, 2007, 05:57:00 PM
Please don't flame me, but I think Deepak looks better than he did in 2005.
Joran looks plain old tired.

I see he upgraded his luggage from wimpy wimpy wimpy to hefty hefty hefty


 :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 03, 2007, 05:57:23 PM
I have to go for sleeping, I see you all tomorrow. Have a great evening!

Good Night NYC....sleep well my friend....see ya tomorrow


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Port Valerie on December 03, 2007, 05:59:51 PM
Posted by the witch at RU:

Glenda wrote:

Yes, I can clear this up. Beth and JQK walked into the Prosecutors office on their own accord. I don't know if it was Beth's nervousness or JQK's "wildzang" that made them 1/2 late to their meeting. 


Or maybe the traffic?  Certainly there was an accident, there always is  :roll:

Or the time difference. Aruba used to be on the same time as the east coast but we changed to Daylight Saving Time and they did not.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: dennisintn on December 03, 2007, 06:02:14 PM
Does Mos have any plan to interrogate Dick Cheney?


 :lol: :lol:

they'll probably want to incarcerate condi rice while they're tearing up washington looking for natalee.  
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2007, 06:06:55 PM
Carlos & Charlies must be attempting to clean up their image - NOT

http://www.magic965.com/gallery/displayimage.php?album=636&pos=157


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: blah on December 03, 2007, 06:09:20 PM
I have to go for sleeping, I see you all tomorrow. Have a great evening!

have a good sleep!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: blah on December 03, 2007, 06:11:43 PM
Carlos & Charlies must be attempting to clean up their image - NOT

http://www.magic965.com/gallery/displayimage.php?album=636&pos=157

 :smt078 :smt078 :smt078 :smt078 :smt078


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Anna on December 03, 2007, 06:12:23 PM
Posted by the witch at RU:

Glenda wrote:

Yes, I can clear this up. Beth and JQK walked into the Prosecutors office on their own accord. I don't know if it was Beth's nervousness or JQK's "wildzang" that made them 1/2 late to their meeting. 


Or maybe the traffic?  Certainly there was an accident, there always is  :roll:

I heard from a reliable source that if you get there too early, you have to wait for them to finish their cornflakes.


And morning cartoons.


 :roll:

Not to mention one article that says Beth was transported by a police car so she wasn't even driving.  Maybe the cop driving the car had to stop for Frosted Flaked and to shave.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: blah on December 03, 2007, 06:15:47 PM
Posted by the witch at RU:

Glenda wrote:

Yes, I can clear this up. Beth and JQK walked into the Prosecutors office on their own accord. I don't know if it was Beth's nervousness or JQK's "wildzang" that made them 1/2 late to their meeting. 


Or maybe the traffic?  Certainly there was an accident, there always is  :roll:

I heard from a reliable source that if you get there too early, you have to wait for them to finish their cornflakes.


And morning cartoons.


 :roll:

Not to mention one article that says Beth was transported by a police car so she wasn't even driving.  Maybe the cop driving the car had to stop for Frosted Flaked and to shave.

.

I wonder if those high tech rednecks...i mean sleuths had her car bugged  :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Blue Moon on December 03, 2007, 06:20:17 PM
Carlos & Charlies must be attempting to clean up their image - NOT

http://www.magic965.com/gallery/displayimage.php?album=636&pos=157

MO, This is DISGUSTING.

Moon


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Anna on December 03, 2007, 06:21:39 PM
Please don't flame me, but I think Deepak looks better than he did in 2005.
Joran looks plain old tired.

I see he upgraded his luggage from wimpy wimpy wimpy to hefty hefty hefty


 :lol:

I don't care who you are, that right there is funny!

 :D :D :D :D




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 03, 2007, 06:22:09 PM
Carlos & Charlies must be attempting to clean up their image - NOT

http://www.magic965.com/gallery/displayimage.php?album=636&pos=157

 :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:.....can you imagine seeing this and one of those young women being your daughter :shock: :shock:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: blah on December 03, 2007, 06:22:34 PM
Posted by the witch at RU:

Glenda wrote:

Yes, I can clear this up. Beth and JQK walked into the Prosecutors office on their own accord. I don't know if it was Beth's nervousness or JQK's "wildzang" that made them 1/2 late to their meeting. 


Or maybe the traffic?  Certainly there was an accident, there always is  :roll:

I heard from a reliable source that if you get there too early, you have to wait for them to finish their cornflakes.


And morning cartoons.


 :roll:

Not to mention one article that says Beth was transported by a police car so she wasn't even driving.  Maybe the cop driving the car had to stop for Frosted Flaked and to shave.

.

I wonder if they ever get tired of their little spin jobs getting busted all the time?



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 03, 2007, 06:24:11 PM
Jenna at RU has gone overe the edge. Here are a few of her most recent Topics on Natalees board.

"Valero gas station/ Antraco copying passport"
"Human trafficking ring from Venezuela"
"An undercover mission commissioned by somebody in the US gov"
"Marijuana laced with cocaine or crack"
"OAS-Ft. Lauderdale, Bolivia, Natalee, and Human Trafficking"


wish she would make up her mind..... :roll:

LOL...Nut, did you wear your tin foil hat when you ventured over there :shock:

No...I wear this >>  :safe:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 03, 2007, 06:24:24 PM
Please don't flame me, but I think Deepak looks better than he did in 2005.
Joran looks plain old tired.

I see he upgraded his luggage from wimpy wimpy wimpy to hefty hefty hefty


 :lol:

I don't care who you are, that right there is funny!

 :D :D :D :D

Oh my gawd it's a riot. :lol: :lol: :lol:..I am not sure how I missed it...other than I am running back and forth...cooking dinner


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: blah on December 03, 2007, 06:24:24 PM
Carlos & Charlies must be attempting to clean up their image - NOT

http://www.magic965.com/gallery/displayimage.php?album=636&pos=157

 :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:.....can you imagine seeing this and one of those young women being your daughter :shock: :shock:

this young lady's mother probably went first!!  :shock:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 03, 2007, 06:25:33 PM
Posted by the witch at RU:

Glenda wrote:

Yes, I can clear this up. Beth and JQK walked into the Prosecutors office on their own accord. I don't know if it was Beth's nervousness or JQK's "wildzang" that made them 1/2 late to their meeting. 


Or maybe the traffic?  Certainly there was an accident, there always is  :roll:

I heard from a reliable source that if you get there too early, you have to wait for them to finish their cornflakes.


And morning cartoons.


 :roll:

Not to mention one article that says Beth was transported by a police car so she wasn't even driving.  Maybe the cop driving the car had to stop for Frosted Flaked and to shave.

.

I wonder if those high tech rednecks...i mean sleuths had her car bugged  :roll:

now Blah...no need to insult rednecks!  LOL


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Anna on December 03, 2007, 06:25:38 PM
Here is an interesting point:

Mos does not need a Judges approval to charge the suspects with crimes. As I understand it, he charges them, and a trial panel of Judges will try them. The only thing the pretrial Judge can do is decide if the charges merit a pretrial detention. The pretrial Judge can not dismiss the charges.

The only thing stopping Mos from trying the case is Mos himself. I think the corruption is deep enough that he will not bring charges because he likes having a job.


If so he hasn't done Aruba a service, Spock. The prosecution of the three Amigos and Paulus would go far to alleviate Aruba's image problems, but this same drugging, raping, and murder will re-occur unless they fix the big problem that caused this in the first place. If they had simply followed the rules and prosecuted Natalee's case like they should have I daresay their tourism and public image would have hardly been affected. The cover-up is what has gotten the island in the trouble it is in.

There's that saying in legal and political circles, "It's not the crime, it's the cover-up." If they don't fix their government and get rid of the Dutch and Aruban corruption they are doomed to repeat themselves. It would also help if they curbed the open sale of drugs and threw the predators that use them on innocent tourist women in prison. Their problem is three-fold: corruption, drugs and local male predators.

I agree with you, but my point was Mos doesn't need anyone's approval to take the suspects to trial. If he wants a trial, he gets one. The problem is, his boss, the Minister of Justice, wants the case closed, and no trial. Now , if he likes his job and his position in government, what do you think he will do?


Spock,
I did not realize Mos does not need a judge to order him to take this to trial.  This is a VERY interesting thought.

But why on earth would he stir all this up if he is not planning to go to trial?  It would have been far better to let sleeping dogs lie, sotaspeak.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 03, 2007, 06:25:42 PM
Do we know if Joran is missing any classes during is stay in Aruba?

I thought he was supposed to be going to school over there in the Netherlands?

You would think if he were really in school over there that Taco would be screaming from the rooftops about how this is a burden on his education.  He NEVER misses an opportunity to portray Joran as the victim.  I have not heard anyone mention all the classes he is missing because of this "detention" :roll:


I was wondering about this also. Seemed a bit early at the time he was brought back over here for Holland to be out on Christmas break. He must be missing classes....not that I care :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 03, 2007, 06:26:09 PM
Jenna at RU has gone overe the edge. Here are a few of her most recent Topics on Natalees board.

"Valero gas station/ Antraco copying passport"
"Human trafficking ring from Venezuela"
"An undercover mission commissioned by somebody in the US gov"
"Marijuana laced with cocaine or crack"
"OAS-Ft. Lauderdale, Bolivia, Natalee, and Human Trafficking"


wish she would make up her mind..... :roll:

LOL...Nut, did you wear your tin foil hat when you ventured over there :shock:

No...I wear this >>  :safe:

hahahahahaha...smart lady!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 03, 2007, 06:26:46 PM
Carlos & Charlies must be attempting to clean up their image - NOT

http://www.magic965.com/gallery/displayimage.php?album=636&pos=157

 :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:.....can you imagine seeing this and one of those young women being your daughter :shock: :shock:

this young lady's mother probably went first!!  :shock:

 :shock: :shock: :shock:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 03, 2007, 06:27:12 PM
Carlos & Charlies must be attempting to clean up their image - NOT

http://www.magic965.com/gallery/displayimage.php?album=636&pos=157

OH GEeeeeeeeezzeeeeeeeeeeee Klaas.....unreal.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: blah on December 03, 2007, 06:28:34 PM
Posted by the witch at RU:

Glenda wrote:

Yes, I can clear this up. Beth and JQK walked into the Prosecutors office on their own accord. I don't know if it was Beth's nervousness or JQK's "wildzang" that made them 1/2 late to their meeting. 


Or maybe the traffic?  Certainly there was an accident, there always is  :roll:

I heard from a reliable source that if you get there too early, you have to wait for them to finish their cornflakes.


And morning cartoons.


 :roll:

Not to mention one article that says Beth was transported by a police car so she wasn't even driving.  Maybe the cop driving the car had to stop for Frosted Flaked and to shave.

.

I wonder if those high tech rednecks...i mean sleuths had her car bugged  :roll:

now Blah...no need to insult rednecks!  LOL

you are right.

that was uncalled for.

I appologize to all the little rednecks out there.

 :lol: :lol: :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Anna on December 03, 2007, 06:28:57 PM
Do we know if Joran is missing any classes during is stay in Aruba?

I thought he was supposed to be going to school over there in the Netherlands?

You would think if he were really in school over there that Taco would be screaming from the rooftops about how this is a burden on his education.  He NEVER misses an opportunity to portray Joran as the victim.  I have not heard anyone mention all the classes he is missing because of this "detention" :roll:


I was wondering about this also. Seemed a bit early at the time he was brought back over here for Holland to be out on Christmas break. He must be missing classes....not that I care :roll:

I think I did see one article that was quoting Paulus as whining about Joran missing his finals. 

I think Natalee has missed a few of hers as well.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2007, 06:29:02 PM
Carlos & Charlies must be attempting to clean up their image - NOT

http://www.magic965.com/gallery/displayimage.php?album=636&pos=157

OH GEeeeeeeeezzeeeeeeeeeeee Klaas.....unreal.

You can see why I didn't just post the photo  :wink: :shock:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 03, 2007, 06:32:05 PM
Carlos & Charlies must be attempting to clean up their image - NOT

http://www.magic965.com/gallery/displayimage.php?album=636&pos=157

OH GEeeeeeeeezzeeeeeeeeeeee Klaas.....unreal.

You can see why I didn't just post the photo  :wink: :shock:


OH YES, Lmaooooo :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Anna on December 03, 2007, 06:32:37 PM
What kind of people think Beth would emerge from a meeting in which she has likely been told for a fact certain that her child is dead being happy?  That is some of the saddest news a parent can ever receive.

Happy is the last thing I would expect her to be!!!

What is wrong with these people?  Even Tito was saying that.  She was devastated I am sure.  Who wants to have that last little ray of hope taken away from them.

And I am sure she was more than happy to answer any questions just as she has been from Day 1!  Beth is NOT the one who covers her ears and refused to answer.

That's Joran because he is guilty! 

Evil scum is what they are.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Katysmom on December 03, 2007, 06:33:08 PM
Posted by the witch at RU:

Glenda wrote:

Yes, I can clear this up. Beth and JQK walked into the Prosecutors office on their own accord. I don't know if it was Beth's nervousness or JQK's "wildzang" that made them 1/2 late to their meeting. 


Or maybe the traffic?  Certainly there was an accident, there always is  :roll:

Or the time difference. Aruba used to be on the same time as the east coast but we changed to Daylight Saving Time and they did not.



And, how would Julia know why the meeting was 1/2 hr late in starting?  Maybe Mos called Beth and delayed it himself?  Julia, go F yourself


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Anna on December 03, 2007, 06:36:05 PM
Carlos & Charlies must be attempting to clean up their image - NOT

http://www.magic965.com/gallery/displayimage.php?album=636&pos=157

OH GEeeeeeeeezzeeeeeeeeeeee Klaas.....unreal.

You can see why I didn't just post the photo  :wink: :shock:

Well, that's just plain disgusting.  Good grief.  And those people don't look much like teens from Mountain Brook to me, either.  I thought it was only Americans who misbehaved in Aruba.  Looks like some of the locals might have them beat by a country mile.

Guess it's growing up around all that sleaze and dope.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: dennisintn on December 03, 2007, 06:37:58 PM
Carlos & Charlies must be attempting to clean up their image - NOT

http://www.magic965.com/gallery/displayimage.php?album=636&pos=157

MO, This is DISGUSTING.

Moon

"the boys" at carlos&charley's sure done like humiliating women, don't they?
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Anna on December 03, 2007, 06:40:17 PM
Why would Beth be nervous since she and Dave are the ones who called this meeting in the first place?

I do so appreciate Mos taking a more professional attitude in this regard as Karin Janssen just showed her rear end over this from the start.  She was Paulus biggest fan and conducted herself from that vantage and never as a professional.  Paulus wouldn't let us is something I doubt we hear Mos saying.

This is what Dave and Beth have both wanted for a very long time and I am gratified that this conversation, which should have happened long ago has finally at long last taken place.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: blah on December 03, 2007, 06:40:55 PM
Carlos & Charlies must be attempting to clean up their image - NOT

http://www.magic965.com/gallery/displayimage.php?album=636&pos=157

MO, This is DISGUSTING.

Moon

that REALLY sad thing is, it looks like it wont be long before the next time.



"the boys" at carlos&charley's sure done like humiliating women, don't they?
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 03, 2007, 06:41:12 PM
re-posting hoping for an answer

Quote from: Silverfox on Today at 12:40:04 PM
Let's see...

Two arrests... then a third... Two releases... but the third stays in jail

The Papa arrested before... then released ... then sues for compensation...

In a judicial review of the compensation suit some "new" evidence was presented and Papa was denied compensation because apparently the bench felt the state was justified in feeling and arresting him because the evidence points to a fact that he was involved in Nat's disappearance.

I have a feeling that this thing is going to get interesting.  My gut tells me they got Joran, and perhaps Papa too (albeit a more minor charge which would explain perhaps why he is not arrested now...yet)...

I also think the K2 will be rearrested and charged before the month is out... but really, don't you wonder if perhaps a "dutch deal" has been cut?  Maybe this is all window dressing and they agreed to testify against J and P and others and so they get out in the manner they did?

And remember... there is still another drama being played in the background... one that I feel might have a legal nexus to this one... the separate "corruption" investigation.  Somehow I wonder if the two cases have a lot of common thread between them and that justice, and we all hope justice prevails, will be served in a much clearer light once Dutch authorities conclude the corruption investigation and begin making arrests.  I assume that such arrests will be "earth shaking" and potentially will bring a major part of the Aruban government down.

JMO.

Thank you Silverfox... was it ever revealed what this 'new' evidences was?

"in a judicial review of the compensation suit some "new" evidence was presented and Papa was denied compensation because apparently the bench felt the state was justified in feeling and arresting him because the evidence points to a fact that he was involved in Nat's disappearance."  this is really confusing... Shocked
ReplyReply


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: sirensong on December 03, 2007, 06:42:30 PM
Carlos & Charlies must be attempting to clean up their image - NOT

http://www.magic965.com/gallery/displayimage.php?album=636&pos=157

C&C is disgusting.  Don't these young girls realize they do this, not for fun, but to further degrade women?  So they can blame them for being whores?  I hate Aruba.  All young American girls should be shown the Natalee Holloway story,  shown pictures like this and let them read about what the Aruban men really think of them. :-x


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: blah on December 03, 2007, 06:48:12 PM
Carlos & Charlies must be attempting to clean up their image - NOT

http://www.magic965.com/gallery/displayimage.php?album=636&pos=157

C&C is disgusting.  Don't these young girls realize they do this, not for fun, but to further degrade women?  So they can blame them for being whores?  I hate Aruba.  All young American girls should be shown the Natalee Holloway story,  shown pictures like this and let them read about what the Aruban men really think of them. :-x

How does C&C's manage to survive the Natalee Holloway story?

This place should have been shut down, the owners locked up, and the building burnt to the ground.

There is no way that place would still be in business in this country.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: sirensong on December 03, 2007, 06:50:17 PM
Same corrupt government that set the JK2 free to smile smugly for the cameras.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: blah on December 03, 2007, 06:54:58 PM
Same corrupt government that set the JK2 free to smile smugly for the cameras.

they just figure it is too much fun to treat women this way to change anything?  If they lose one every now and then - oh well, thats the just the way it goes sometimes?

I dont understand why they would allow this behavior to continue.  The money would come to the island WITHOUT this nonsense, so I dont think its that.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Anna on December 03, 2007, 07:13:17 PM
Carlos & Charlies must be attempting to clean up their image - NOT

http://www.magic965.com/gallery/displayimage.php?album=636&pos=157

C&C is disgusting.  Don't these young girls realize they do this, not for fun, but to further degrade women?  So they can blame them for being whores?  I hate Aruba.  All young American girls should be shown the Natalee Holloway story,  shown pictures like this and let them read about what the Aruban men really think of them. :-x

And not just American girls as most of those appear to be locals to me.  Women in general.  And note the pervert baby bottle pedophile prop as well. 

These men are degenerates for sure.  A society is only as good as its men for they are the ones who to this day have the power as far as earning money, judicial and legislative power.  I don't think any country ever became great on the morals of just the women. 

Have never heard of a country whose slogan was "Our men are sorrier than chit but our women are pretty decent."  Those guys on that stage need taken out somewhere and the living crap beat out of them in my opinion.

Oh, but that would be wrong like what they are doing isn't?

Blah, you are right. C&C;s home office should have long ago closed down that hellhole.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Anna on December 03, 2007, 07:16:44 PM
Any known media coverage tonight? 

How about Greta van der Sloot--er I mean van Susteren?  I would love to hear what Beth has to say about her meeting with Mos but she may still be too tired from traveling.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: terryd270 on December 03, 2007, 07:17:04 PM
Just checking to see if they kept Joran locked up or has he been released as Joe T. was saying he was going to have done??  Sorry I have nothing to add, just curious about the situation was on the catch and release killers that Aruba seems to have..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 03, 2007, 07:18:01 PM
Same corrupt government that set the JK2 free to smile smugly for the cameras.

they just figure it is too much fun to treat women this way to change anything?  If they lose one every now and then - oh well, thats the just the way it goes sometimes?

I dont understand why they would allow this behavior to continue.  The money would come to the island WITHOUT this nonsense, so I dont think its that.



I've heard that all of the CnC's are similar.  Friends have told me that in some women leave their bras where they are slung over the rafters or whatever.   Those pictures from Aruba are disgusting and it looked like bras weren't available  :silent:...those guys who were part of that routine should get a real job, and keep their shirt and their pants on...all slicked up with oil like body builders (NOT)...aaaaccck...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2007, 07:18:57 PM
Any known media coverage tonight? 

How about Greta van der Sloot--er I mean van Susteren?  I would love to hear what Beth has to say about her meeting with Mos but she may still be too tired from traveling.

.

Yes I believe Greta will be covering the case.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: greeneyedlady on December 03, 2007, 07:19:30 PM
Carlos & Charlies must be attempting to clean up their image - NOT

http://www.magic965.com/gallery/displayimage.php?album=636&pos=157

MO, This is DISGUSTING.

Moon

Trying to catch up but just wanted to say that's exactly my thoughts also.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: adoronron on December 03, 2007, 07:20:03 PM
Any known media coverage tonight? 

How about Greta van der Sloot--er I mean van Susteren?  I would love to hear what Beth has to say about her meeting with Mos but she may still be too tired from traveling.

.
Greta van der Sloot
That was a good one Anna

 :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Ado


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2007, 07:20:39 PM
Just checking to see if they kept Joran locked up or has he been released as Joe T. was saying he was going to have done??  Sorry I have nothing to add, just curious about the situation was on the catch and release killers that Aruba seems to have..

JoeT was talking like they were going to file the motion TODAY to have Joran released.  We have'nt heard a word about it.  Nothing at RU.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: da_wench on December 03, 2007, 07:23:48 PM
Posted by the witch at RU:

Glenda wrote:

Yes, I can clear this up. Beth and JQK walked into the Prosecutors office on their own accord. I don't know if it was Beth's nervousness or JQK's "wildzang" that made them 1/2 late to their meeting. 


Or maybe the traffic?  Certainly there was an accident, there always is  :roll:

I heard from a reliable source that if you get there too early, you have to wait for them to finish their cornflakes.


And morning cartoons.


 :roll:

Not to mention one article that says Beth was transported by a police car so she wasn't even driving.  Maybe the cop driving the car had to stop for Frosted Flaked and to shave.

.

I wonder if those high tech rednecks...i mean sleuths had her car bugged  :roll:

I can't stand that smart*ass Glenda the dumbwitch! 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2007, 07:28:15 PM
da_wench - join the club!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: blah on December 03, 2007, 07:29:06 PM
Any known media coverage tonight? 

How about Greta van der Sloot--er I mean van Susteren?  I would love to hear what Beth has to say about her meeting with Mos but she may still be too tired from traveling.

.

Greta van der sloot - nice!!!

 :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Observer on December 03, 2007, 07:51:47 PM
Why was a lawyer(Elgin Zeppenfeldt)in David Kock's firm escorting Deepak from jail to his home the other day? Wasn't Deepak paying for the services of another firm as Kock & Wix were told they could only represent Satish?

http://www.dkwlegal.com/english/lawyersEN.html

(http://img530.imageshack.us/img530/3507/zep1pj5.png) (http://imageshack.us)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 03, 2007, 07:52:37 PM
Wheel of Fortune, I know is pretaped, but a young guy just won a trip to Aruba, Westin....valued at $5,900.... :roll: :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: blah on December 03, 2007, 07:57:17 PM
Why was a lawyer(Elgin Zeppenfeldt) in David Kock's firm escorting Deepak from jail to his home the other day? Wasn't Deepak paying for the services of another firm as Kock & Wix were told they could only represent Satish?

http://www.dkwlegal.com/english/lawyersEN.html

(http://img530.imageshack.us/img530/3507/zep1pj5.png) (http://imageshack.us)

very nice catch!!

Were they supposed to stay away from each others lawyers/info sharing eventhough they were released?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: wreck on December 03, 2007, 07:58:53 PM
Why was a lawyer in David Kock's firm escorting Deepak from jail to his home the other day? Wasn't Deepak paying for the services of another firm as Kock & Wix were told they could only represent Satish?

http://www.dkwlegal.com/english/lawyersEN.html

(http://img530.imageshack.us/img530/3507/zep1pj5.png) (http://imageshack.us)

very nice catch!!

Were they supposed to stay away from each others lawyers/info sharing eventhough they were released?
I thought they won the petition for them to represent both brothers.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: wreck on December 03, 2007, 08:00:12 PM
..besides, would you even WANT this dude representing you??? he looks like one of the "pimps."


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: blah on December 03, 2007, 08:02:10 PM
..besides, would you even WANT this dude representing you??? he looks like one of the "pimps."

ni kidding. this guy looks stoned


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Anna on December 03, 2007, 08:03:08 PM
Between the thousand-yard stare and all the facial hair/five oclock shadows and dark circles under eyes,  I can't tell Deepak from Satish any more.  How do you know which is which now?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Observer on December 03, 2007, 08:04:15 PM

I must have missed the results of David Kocks appeal to represent both brothers as I have not seen that posted.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: MuffyBee on December 03, 2007, 08:05:24 PM
..besides, would you even WANT this dude representing you??? he looks like one of the "pimps."

Maybe he was in stealth mode, trying to blend in with the island...  Going undercover. I can't see his feet.  Is he wearing flip flops to complete the ensemble?  Who would have thought this was an attorney?  I wouldn't have.  Interesting.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 03, 2007, 08:07:29 PM
Any known media coverage tonight? 

How about Greta van der Sloot
--er I mean van Susteren?  I would love to hear what Beth has to say about her meeting with Mos but she may still be too tired from traveling..

hahahahaha...now THAT IS funny! 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: blah on December 03, 2007, 08:07:33 PM
Between the thousand-yard stare and all the facial hair/five oclock shadows and dark circles under eyes,  I can't tell Deepak from Satish any more.  How do you know which is which now?


Satish like chicken wing

ehhhhhhh ehhhhhh  ehhhhh

chicken wing good

ehhhhh

more chicken   :smt117


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: JA on December 03, 2007, 08:08:04 PM
Satish has the bushy eyebrows.

I don't think you could even dress-up that lawyer!  Are we sure he is a lawyer?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 03, 2007, 08:12:07 PM
Wheel of Fortune, I know is pretaped, but a young guy just won a trip to Aruba, Westin....valued at $5,900.... :roll: :roll:

I hope he doesn't take any young females with him....he is putting their lives in jeopardy if he does


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2007, 08:14:07 PM

I must have missed the results of David Kocks appeal to represent both brothers as I have not seen that posted.

Do they mention his name in the article?  He doesn't look like the same person to me but my eyes are tired  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Observer on December 03, 2007, 08:14:33 PM
(http://img131.imageshack.us/img131/7208/elginae9.png) (http://imageshack.us)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 03, 2007, 08:15:35 PM

I must have missed the results of David Kocks appeal to represent both brothers as I have not seen that posted.

I didn't either.....but I admit I do miss a lot when I don't have time to go back and read


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Observer on December 03, 2007, 08:16:12 PM

I must have missed the results of David Kocks appeal to represent both brothers as I have not seen that posted.

Do they mention his name in the article?  He doesn't look like the same person to me but my eyes are tired  :wink:

Yes they do. It's Elgin Zeppenfeldt,same lawyer that spoke for Satish in 2005


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: blah on December 03, 2007, 08:20:32 PM
anyone still got that pick of tht pig eating that chicken wing?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Observer on December 03, 2007, 08:20:35 PM
(http://img46.imageshack.us/img46/4417/elgin3fz1.png) (http://imageshack.us)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2007, 08:21:18 PM
IMO - not the same guy.  The ears don't match:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/LawyerCompare.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: blah on December 03, 2007, 08:26:12 PM
i'm not very good at this but he sure looks like the same guy to me  :smt102


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Observer on December 03, 2007, 08:27:35 PM

Definetly the same guy with his hair shorter and darker in that picture. I have seen him interviewed and I am looking at several articles that say he is Elgin Zeppenfeldt.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Silverfox on December 03, 2007, 08:29:49 PM
re-posting hoping for an answer

Quote from: Silverfox on Today at 12:40:04 PM
Let's see...

Two arrests... then a third... Two releases... but the third stays in jail

The Papa arrested before... then released ... then sues for compensation...

In a judicial review of the compensation suit some "new" evidence was presented and Papa was denied compensation because apparently the bench felt the state was justified in feeling and arresting him because the evidence points to a fact that he was involved in Nat's disappearance.

I have a feeling that this thing is going to get interesting.  My gut tells me they got Joran, and perhaps Papa too (albeit a more minor charge which would explain perhaps why he is not arrested now...yet)...

I also think the K2 will be rearrested and charged before the month is out... but really, don't you wonder if perhaps a "dutch deal" has been cut?  Maybe this is all window dressing and they agreed to testify against J and P and others and so they get out in the manner they did?

And remember... there is still another drama being played in the background... one that I feel might have a legal nexus to this one... the separate "corruption" investigation.  Somehow I wonder if the two cases have a lot of common thread between them and that justice, and we all hope justice prevails, will be served in a much clearer light once Dutch authorities conclude the corruption investigation and begin making arrests.  I assume that such arrests will be "earth shaking" and potentially will bring a major part of the Aruban government down.

JMO.

Thank you Silverfox... was it ever revealed what this 'new' evidences was?

"in a judicial review of the compensation suit some "new" evidence was presented and Papa was denied compensation because apparently the bench felt the state was justified in feeling and arresting him because the evidence points to a fact that he was involved in Nat's disappearance."  this is really confusing... Shocked
ReplyReply

Oh Sorry, missed this...

Remember? They said the former prosecutor (just before she left) attached a file and everyone has speculated it was a "wiretap" that caught Paulos up...

Now wouldn't it be interesting if that same wiretap (if, indeed, a wiretap) was a conversation between he and Joran?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: blah on December 03, 2007, 08:29:56 PM
besides, what are the odds of 2 lawyers running around the island that look that identically dorky??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 03, 2007, 08:32:23 PM
IMO - not the same guy.  The ears don't match:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/LawyerCompare.jpg)

But the pig nose is just as piggy in one as the other!  :pig: :smt081


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2007, 08:33:57 PM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/LawyerCompare.jpg)

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/LawyerEarComparison.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2007, 08:35:10 PM
They could be related, even brothers.  I'm just saying the ears look different to me.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Silverfox on December 03, 2007, 08:35:36 PM
IMO - not the same guy.  The ears don't match:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/LawyerCompare.jpg)

But the pig nose is just as piggy in one as the other!  :pig: :smt081

Brothers maybe?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 03, 2007, 08:36:53 PM


Oh Sorry, missed this...

Remember? They said the former prosecutor (just before she left) attached a file and everyone has speculated it was a "wiretap" that caught Paulos up...

Now wouldn't it be interesting if that same wiretap (if, indeed, a wiretap) was a conversation between he and Joran?

thanks again Silverfox...yes I remembered some discussion about a possible tape......land YES wouldn't that be something if if were indeed one and the same....and to think it was there and no one pursued it!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 03, 2007, 08:38:48 PM
IMO - not the same guy.  The ears don't match:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/LawyerCompare.jpg)

But the pig nose is just as piggy in one as the other!  :pig: :smt081

eyebrows and mouth the same too I think.
You all are a hoot tonight by the way!!!
C& C pics absolutely disgusting!!! Can you imagine applying for a job when you get older and having those pics come back to haunt you??!! Let alone getting married!!! YUCK~!!!!! Have some pride girls!!! AAAHHH!!! :2ukli:

OK...gotta go help the little guy with homework and check and see if Red took me up on my Ohio State bet...quick update..any new news today?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 03, 2007, 08:38:49 PM
IMO - not the same guy.  The ears don't match:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/LawyerCompare.jpg)

klaas...can you put the hair of the guy on the left on the head of the guy on the right? It kinda looks like the same guy...look at the eyebrows


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: AZSunny on December 03, 2007, 08:39:52 PM
IMO - not the same guy.  The ears don't match:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/LawyerCompare.jpg)

Maybe his younger brother 'helping out'  there is a similarity.  Not sure it is the same guy though.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 03, 2007, 08:39:53 PM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/LawyerCompare.jpg)

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/LawyerEarComparison.jpg)

i see what you mean about the ears


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Silverfox on December 03, 2007, 08:44:29 PM


Oh Sorry, missed this...

Remember? They said the former prosecutor (just before she left) attached a file and everyone has speculated it was a "wiretap" that caught Paulos up...

Now wouldn't it be interesting if that same wiretap (if, indeed, a wiretap) was a conversation between he and Joran?

See... It could be that there was already an investigation for corruption going on...drugs, money laundering, public officials in the pocket bribery, right?  What if Paulos/and or/Joran/or both were already being "tapped" (but most probably paulos due to his high public profile as a soon to be judge) and what if this was the "tap" that got him when he tried to sue...

See, I have wondered about this ever since it happened (the dismissal of his claim and the subsequent speculation) and if you thake that and consider the team from Holland that later came to investigate other fraud issues... well... it has often been said that perhaps things didn't move so quickly in the Nat's case becuase perhaps a larger sting operation was already in play and maybe Nat just happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time and one of ht eplayers just happened to be the son of someone being investigated, right?  just some thoughts as we watch this saga continue to unfold.... I often wondered about the DEA agent that met Beth that first night...

thanks again Silverfox...yes I remembered some discussion about a possible tape......land YES wouldn't that be something if if were indeed one and the same....and to think it was there and no one pursued it!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 03, 2007, 08:49:42 PM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/LawyerCompare.jpg)

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/LawyerEarComparison.jpg)

i see what you mean about the ears

I think the shadow and little bit of hair over ear in new pics makes them look different...but nose, eyebrows and mouth looks like same guy to me.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Silverfox on December 03, 2007, 08:51:29 PM


Oh Sorry, missed this...

Remember? They said the former prosecutor (just before she left) attached a file and everyone has speculated it was a "wiretap" that caught Paulos up...

Now wouldn't it be interesting if that same wiretap (if, indeed, a wiretap) was a conversation between he and Joran?



thanks again Silverfox...yes I remembered some discussion about a possible tape......and YES wouldn't that be something if if were indeed one and the same....and to think it was there and no one pursued it!!

Sorry, computer did a very strange thing and the response came out in the middle of the quotes:

See... It could be that there was already an investigation for corruption going on...drugs, money laundering, public officials in the pocket bribery, right?  What if Paulos/and or/Joran/or both were already being "tapped" (but most probably paulos due to his high public profile as a soon to be judge) and what if this was the "tap" that got him when he tried to sue...

See, I have wondered about this ever since it happened (the dismissal of his claim and the subsequent speculation) and if you thake that and consider the team from Holland that later came to investigate other fraud issues... well... it has often been said that perhaps things didn't move so quickly in the Nat's case because perhaps a larger sting operation was already in play and maybe Nat just happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time and one of ht eplayers just happened to be the son of someone being investigated, right?  just some thoughts as we watch this saga continue to unfold.... I often wondered about the DEA agent that met Beth that first night...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 03, 2007, 08:51:44 PM
ok...SOMEONE is not doing homework...so I better go "help". I am assuming no new news? Sunny...if there is can you send me an e-mail?
Night Monkeys!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 03, 2007, 08:52:56 PM


Oh Sorry, missed this...

Remember? They said the former prosecutor (just before she left) attached a file and everyone has speculated it was a "wiretap" that caught Paulos up...

Now wouldn't it be interesting if that same wiretap (if, indeed, a wiretap) was a conversation between he and Joran?



thanks again Silverfox...yes I remembered some discussion about a possible tape......land YES wouldn't that be something if if were indeed one and the same....and to think it was there and no one pursued it!!


See... It could be that there was already an investigation for corruption going on...drugs, money laundering, public officials in the pocket bribery, right?  What if Paulos/and or/Joran/or both were already being "tapped" (but most probably paulos due to his high public profile as a soon to be judge) and what if this was the "tap" that got him when he tried to sue...

Silverfox posted: See, I have wondered about this ever since it happened (the dismissal of his claim and the subsequent speculation) and if you take that and consider the team from Holland that later came to investigate other fraud issues... well... it has often been said that perhaps things didn't move so quickly in the Nat's case because perhaps a larger sting operation was already in play and maybe Nat just happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time and one of the players just happened to be the son of someone being investigated, right?  just some thoughts as we watch this saga continue to unfold.... I often wondered about the DEA agent that met Beth that first night...

All this really makes a lot of sense and could well explain a couple of things...such as the DEA agent and the obvious cover up that was so 'in your face'.....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 03, 2007, 08:55:33 PM
ok...SOMEONE is not doing homework...so I better go "help". I am assuming no new news? Sunny...if there is can you send me an e-mail?
Night Monkeys!!!!

Hi LD...bye LD...will email/call you if there's anything new...I am going to have a coffee and some Bailey's BEFORE I attempt to watch greta tonight..... :shock: :shock:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Frank on December 03, 2007, 09:02:06 PM
I really don't think this was part of something elaborate. That would mean that the disgrace of Janssen was a cover? I don't think so.

I cannot believe the Dutch would covertly have their hands wrapped around this situation and let the buffoons embarrass them to such a degree.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Anna on December 03, 2007, 09:11:26 PM
I think Greta is going to have John Q Kelly on tonight.

And about time it is.

What do you want to bet she then has Taco on to give him the last word.  Not at the same time, mind you, but only after John Q so that whatever Taco says will be what sticks in the minds of people.

Jerk!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Altruist on December 03, 2007, 09:14:44 PM
We never found out the reasons behind the failing of the Judge in Training?  That took place at least two months prior to the violence that took place by the VDS scum.  Would seem that somebody had discovered something major about old VDS scum.

Also think that Shango had possibly two reasons for appearing on the internet.  One = was to place the reasonable doubt scenario's in the event that jrVDS scum was ever brought to trial & Two = to put in print the threat of what part of the defense would be hauling in the BIG PIGS WITH POSITION of their after hours perversions, which could very well have included video's cuz I am just certain their are rooms on the Devil's Island that are rigged just for that purpose, to get the tourists & the officials.  How many of either have you ever met that have refused an UPGRADE or a GIFT of APPRECIATION?  What do they call that EXTORTION?  Yep that it the threat of extortion through the internet, Shango was in it for the Slootscum.

JMHO



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on December 03, 2007, 09:39:06 PM
Greta just said she will have John Q Kelly on her show tonight, back from Aruba!  Hopefully no Taco!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2007, 09:40:58 PM
Greta just said she will have John Q Kelly on her show tonight, back from Aruba!  Hopefully no Taco!!!!

Cool thanks!  My bet is JoeT will be on too though.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 03, 2007, 09:49:51 PM
   I doubt very much that anything will be dislosed by JQK other than they are hopeful. They had a good meeting on Aruba, etc.
Joe T will speak using his " outside ' voice, the spittle will come out of his mouth and he will have the huffy puffies. He needs to sit in the Naughty Chair and BE SILENT.
But, I will check in later as I do not do Greta and her show or her blog.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: AZSunny on December 03, 2007, 10:18:20 PM
JQK coming up on the record


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Magnolia on December 03, 2007, 10:18:54 PM
Greta just said she will have John Q Kelly on her show tonight, back from Aruba!  Hopefully no Taco!!!!

Cool thanks!  My bet is JoeT will be on too though.

But wasn't Joe T suppose to go to Aruba today to defend his client
and file a motion for Joran's early dismissal?
I bet he will be on too....and after JQK


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Puzzler on December 03, 2007, 10:19:42 PM
JQK coming up in about 1 minute on Greta's show


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: AZSunny on December 03, 2007, 10:19:54 PM
I didn't realize how early in the hour it was. I am sure he will be last.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Puzzler on December 03, 2007, 10:22:45 PM
Of course, JQK is NOT next....what a tease


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 03, 2007, 10:28:39 PM
Why does Greta keep asking where the Kalpoes are?  Is that a tease too?  Why do I watch her...it gets my blood pressure up.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: AZSunny on December 03, 2007, 10:29:39 PM
I just emailed Greta to leave Taco in the box.   :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: AZSunny on December 03, 2007, 10:30:36 PM
Why does Greta keep asking where the Kalpoes are?  Is that a tease too?  Why do I watch her...it gets my blood pressure up.

Lala, don't watch her.  We will tell you what happened!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 03, 2007, 10:32:11 PM
I just emailed Greta to leave Taco in the box.   :lol:


OMG! You didn't.  :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Anna on December 03, 2007, 10:32:14 PM
Why does Greta keep asking where the Kalpoes are?  Is that a tease too?  Why do I watch her...it gets my blood pressure up.

Lala, don't watch her.  We will tell you what happened!

They're in your basement, Greta!  Didn't you just hear that scary thumbing noise???


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: robots on December 03, 2007, 10:36:39 PM
maybe joran bit that guys ear  :cool:
it wouldnt surprise me
i think joran is a monster, MONSTERS bite people

JOE T bites  :cool:


just got it in, shoveling and snow throwing

mmmmmmm....my favorite thing to do


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Frijole on December 03, 2007, 10:37:18 PM
oh oh.. am watching JQK on Greta and I think I am going to vomit.  This is very bad.  When he says they have nothing new and it s a real shame and travesty of justice... I lose hope.

Ah shit.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: San on December 03, 2007, 10:37:49 PM
JQK said his weekend was disappointing.  Raised expectations again and the same thing no progress down there.

JQK said the new evidence is nothing.

99% nothing new.

Nothing new and incriminating.

JQK said it is really unfortunate and really sad.  It's not fair to bring Beth & Dave down there with false promises.  It took whatever spirit Beth and Dave had.  JQK said he thinks it's clearly over.

Prosecutor said the reason why the investigation failed was 1. the family 2. bringing in the DEA agent in.

JQK said KJ brought more passion to the case.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Puzzler on December 03, 2007, 10:38:31 PM
Disappointing to me and extraordinarily cruel to Beth and Dave
Misleading statements as to new materials
99% certainty there’s nothing new
Nothing incriminating
Fairly certain Joran will be released Friday if not earlier
Greta says somebody’s nuts
JQK its really sad, Beth and Dave would like to get some answers
Not fair to bring them down to Aruba with promises that didn’t pan out
JQK thinks it’s clearly over
JQK said to Mos that it’s all basically incompetent
No answers to anything we asked while we were down there

JQK sounded disgusted and I KNOW I'M DISGUSTED!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: San on December 03, 2007, 10:38:54 PM
HANS MOS SUCKS AND IS AS CROOKED AS THE REST OF THEM.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: wreck on December 03, 2007, 10:39:07 PM
I could not have been more wrong. Crushed.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: San on December 03, 2007, 10:39:37 PM
(http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d118/Sanddrops/Scared%20Monkeys/LOCK2.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: robots on December 03, 2007, 10:40:00 PM
crank up the boycott

mos sucks


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Sue on December 03, 2007, 10:41:11 PM


SO I guess a re-enforced effort to sink the island and there tourism
Maybe Dave will re-think that boycott now


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: igsigs on December 03, 2007, 10:41:30 PM
wow


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 03, 2007, 10:41:47 PM
Didn't know what to post, so I fixed a drink.

I raise my glass to Natalee and her family. Aruba can go to Hell.

Let's help them get there quickly, monkeys.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: robots on December 03, 2007, 10:42:46 PM
and the judges that held the JERKS over this time are just as corrupt

there is either NEW evidence or there is not

JERK OFFS


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 03, 2007, 10:43:48 PM
I suppose we don't have to wonder about why Beth looked so unhappy as she left, huh?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 03, 2007, 10:44:59 PM
JQK said his weekend was disappointing.  Raised expectations again and the same thing no progress down there.

JQK said the new evidence is nothing.

99% nothing new.

Nothing new and incriminating.

JQK said it is really unfortunate and really sad.  It's not fair to bring Beth & Dave down there with false promises.  It took whatever spirit Beth and Dave had.  JQK said he thinks it's clearly over.

Prosecutor said the reason why the investigation failed was 1. the family 2. bringing in the DEA agent in.

JQK said KJ brought more passion to the case.

Thank you San.

I am so angry ... Julia Renfro has won!!!

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: San on December 03, 2007, 10:46:12 PM
Michael Cardoza is really going after Hans Mos.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 03, 2007, 10:46:46 PM
TES is close to Aruba, right?

I pray Tim will find her and I hope they can just bring her home. Then I hope the island sinks in the ocean.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Magnolia on December 03, 2007, 10:47:22 PM
I feel really sick.  I had faith in Mos.  He has said things in interviews
that clearly counter what JQK just said.  What about the tiny bit of new evidence?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: San on December 03, 2007, 10:47:33 PM
Greta said here is what the people don't know.  There were a lot of people who were never questioned in Aruba.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 03, 2007, 10:48:16 PM
San and others were right about this.....JQK again called it a dog & pony show...gave Karen Janssen a nod as having more initiative and heart....geez....sucks...

The rats will feast on this, but I hope karma still has a chance....in my lifetime for Natalee & her family.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: robots on December 03, 2007, 10:48:17 PM
so again

aruba blames the family

very nice,

how in the hell can it be Beth's fault


geshsssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss

sick losers


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on December 03, 2007, 10:48:30 PM
 :smt076   I'm speechless. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Sue on December 03, 2007, 10:48:52 PM


Well does this mean they close the case? DOes teh family get to request all the police records? what happens now? besides BOYCOTT


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: robots on December 03, 2007, 10:49:03 PM
I feel really sick.  I had faith in Mos.  He has said things in interviews
that clearly counter what JQK just said.  What about the tiny bit of new evidence?


MOS SUCKS


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: San on December 03, 2007, 10:49:05 PM
I feel really sick.  I had faith in Mos.  He has said things in interviews
that clearly counter what JQK just said.  What about the tiny bit of new evidence?

What about explosive.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Blue Moon on December 03, 2007, 10:49:05 PM
AND greta is INCLINED to STILL BELIEVE Joran. Sick Sick Sick :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 03, 2007, 10:49:17 PM
Yep, and Greta went on to say that she is still inclined to believe Joran.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on December 03, 2007, 10:49:52 PM
so again

aruba blames the family

very nice,

how in the hell can it be Beth's fault


geshsssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss

sick losers

Guess no trip to the bank and no cigar smoking...  :smt089


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Puzzler on December 03, 2007, 10:49:52 PM
WHAT ON EARTH IS GONIG ON???

Viscious and cruel to do this to Beth and Dave and the rest of the family.

Wow....Mos fooled the WORLD!!!

Good grief - Greta says she's still inclined to believe Joran


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: wreck on December 03, 2007, 10:50:02 PM
New Evidence? Wiretaps? Infiltrators? Indisputable evidence Natalee is Dead? WTF????????????????


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: nimrod on December 03, 2007, 10:50:08 PM
TES is close to Aruba, right?

I pray Tim will find her and I hope they can just bring her home. Then I hope the island sinks in the ocean.

It's all  in Tim' hand now.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Frijole on December 03, 2007, 10:50:08 PM
TES is close to Aruba, right?

I pray Tim will find her and I hope they can just bring her home. Then I hope the island sinks in the ocean.

AMEN.  Our only hope at this point is Tim.  Certainly God would want dear Natalee brought home.  At this point, what is justice for Natalee?  It is clear to the entire world that JVDS and K2 are guilty as hell.  They will lead horrible, unproductive lives.  Aruba's tourism will continue to rot til they are nothing more than a penal colony for Venezuela.

Just let them bring Natalee home.  Is that too much to ask?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 03, 2007, 10:51:29 PM
What was it JQK said? They couldn't answer the first questions that beth and he asked?

The judge said there was strong evidence of disposal of a body. What was that all about?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Puzzler on December 03, 2007, 10:51:33 PM
JQK said his weekend was disappointing.  Raised expectations again and the same thing no progress down there.

JQK said the new evidence is nothing.

99% nothing new.

Nothing new and incriminating.

JQK said it is really unfortunate and really sad.  It's not fair to bring Beth & Dave down there with false promises.  It took whatever spirit Beth and Dave had.  JQK said he thinks it's clearly over.

Prosecutor said the reason why the investigation failed was 1. the family 2. bringing in the DEA agent in.

JQK said KJ brought more passion to the case.

Thank you San.

I am so angry ... Julia Renfro has won!!!

Janet

He also said the MEDIA was to blame for this failing


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 03, 2007, 10:52:12 PM
It's over...I am going to be sick...That place has allowed them to get away with murder.  A sad commentary on the world...and Mos blamed the family and the media....Get real Mos...you know damn well the family had nothing to do with the lying scumbags getting away with this...you are a part of this whole fiasco...why in the hell anyone would trust you is beyond me. 

I have to get out of here.
 




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 03, 2007, 10:52:19 PM
Yep, and Greta went on to say that she is still inclined to believe Joran.

 :-x


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 03, 2007, 10:52:52 PM
New Evidence? Wiretaps? Infiltrators? Indisputable evidence Natalee is Dead? WTF????????????????

Exactly, Wreck. What is all that about?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on December 03, 2007, 10:53:05 PM
TES is close to Aruba, right?

I pray Tim will find her and I hope they can just bring her home. Then I hope the island sinks in the ocean.

It's all  in Tim' hand now.

Exactly,  just bring her home to rest.  Joran, etc.  will have judgement day as the rest of us.  God knows what happened.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: robots on December 03, 2007, 10:53:49 PM
i sure as heck would like to see WHAT he told the judge the EVIDENCE was

because the JUDGE had to have NEW EVIDENCE to hodl them over

something really stinks


cigars are crushed for now


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Flmom47 on December 03, 2007, 10:54:05 PM
I don't post but after listening to JQK, I'm absolutely disgusted and mad at the likes of this so called investigation!! Unfriggin believable! What a travesty for the Holloway family and my heart breaks for them! I've visited Aruba one time but you can bet my arse, Aruba will never see my tourism dollars again!  BOYCOTT ARUBA!!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Blue Moon on December 03, 2007, 10:54:22 PM
Is this why the ships log was taken down?  Makes since now why everything was blacked out.  They do not have permission to come near that island so they are having to either go for what they can get without them or they have to turn around. Sad.

BOYCOTT ARUBA.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Puzzler on December 03, 2007, 10:54:25 PM
and the judges that held the JERKS over this time are just as corrupt

there is either NEW evidence or there is not

JERK OFFS

What about the judge saying that he wouldn't hold the 2K any longer, but yet they made them wait until 4:00 p.m. the next day to let 2K go?  EVERYTHING about it, EVERY SINGLE THING, is NUTS!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: robots on December 03, 2007, 10:55:18 PM
aruba and the dutch just signed their own demise


LOSERS like i have never seen before in my entire life


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 03, 2007, 10:55:21 PM
Klaas? Please join us................I need to hear from you. Anybody need a hand to hold? Mine's outreached to all of us and mostly to Natalee's family.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 03, 2007, 10:55:32 PM
JQK said his weekend was disappointing.  Raised expectations again and the same thing no progress down there.

JQK said the new evidence is nothing.

99% nothing new.

Nothing new and incriminating.

JQK said it is really unfortunate and really sad.  It's not fair to bring Beth & Dave down there with false promises.  It took whatever spirit Beth and Dave had.  JQK said he thinks it's clearly over.

Prosecutor said the reason why the investigation failed was 1. the family 2. bringing in the DEA agent in.

JQK said KJ brought more passion to the case.

Thank you San.

I am so angry ... Julia Renfro has won!!!

Janet

He also said the MEDIA was to blame for this failing

... anything but a corrupt investigation with an agenda to protect Joran and Paulus from implication.   :-x

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Blue Moon on December 03, 2007, 10:55:50 PM
It's over...I am going to be sick...That place has allowed them to get away with murder.  A sad commentary on the world...and Mos blamed the family and the media....Get real Mos...you know damn well the family had nothing to do with the lying scumbags getting away with this...you are a part of this whole fiasco...why in the hell anyone would trust you is beyond me. 

I have to get out of here.
 




Well he COULD NOT say Paulus caused this now could he.  Who got to him?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 03, 2007, 10:56:26 PM
Is this why the ships log was taken down?  Makes since now why everything was blacked out.  They do not have permission to come near that island so they are having to either go for what they can get without them or they have to turn around. Sad.

BOYCOTT ARUBA.

mmmm


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Dana on December 03, 2007, 10:56:28 PM
Greta said here is what the people don't know.  There were a lot of people who were never questioned in Aruba.

yeah and im sure she has questioned them (cough), if what kelly says is true and the prosecutor said what hurt the case was too much media, i agree with that.
kelly has been no great ball of fire for me, i dont know what went on behind the scenes but he seems like a overpaid mouthpiece.
it aint over till the fat lady sings no matter what kelly and greta say.
i think it is wrong for JQK to come on north american media and say that, or if its true aruba is a bigger disaster than what we all think it is.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: robots on December 03, 2007, 10:56:40 PM
Greta sucks as bad as mos



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Puzzler on December 03, 2007, 10:57:09 PM
I feel really sick.  I had faith in Mos.  He has said things in interviews
that clearly counter what JQK just said.  What about the tiny bit of new evidence?

What about explosive.

Yes, WHAT ABOUT explosive?!?  Mos fooled the WORLD.  He WILL go down in infamy.  He may have heretofore had a good career, but he can say bye-bye to that now.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2007, 10:57:31 PM
Tiny glimmer of hope posted by Lazlo at RU:

Lazlo Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2007 10:55 pm   

Mos about meeting the family: The OM has choosen to be open as possible, but that would go as far as not sharing anything that could harm the investigation. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: robots on December 03, 2007, 10:57:44 PM
It's over...I am going to be sick...That place has allowed them to get away with murder.  A sad commentary on the world...and Mos blamed the family and the media....Get real Mos...you know damn well the family had nothing to do with the lying scumbags getting away with this...you are a part of this whole fiasco...why in the hell anyone would trust you is beyond me. 

I have to get out of here.
 
exactly



Well he COULD NOT say Paulus caused this now could he.  Who got to him?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Puzzler on December 03, 2007, 10:59:47 PM
i sure as heck would like to see WHAT he told the judge the EVIDENCE was

because the JUDGE had to have NEW EVIDENCE to hodl them over

something really stinks


cigars are crushed for now

The judge in Holland had to review the new evidence in order to send Joran back to Aruba.  That was a big decision.  Can all the initial judges be soooo incorrect (yep, i guess so)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 03, 2007, 11:00:24 PM
What's this about the ship's log being down? Tim's still going to search, right??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: robots on December 03, 2007, 11:00:34 PM
aruba can go to hell

the dutch can go to hell

and when tourism sinks and then they decide to come clean i will forever even after they do get them all NEVER want anything to do with any of them EVER

somethings are truly unforgiveable

and this is one of them


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: wreck on December 03, 2007, 11:00:38 PM
Tiny glimmer of hope posted by Lazlo at RU:

Lazlo Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2007 10:55 pm   

Mos about meeting the family: The OM has choosen to be open as possible, but that would go as far as not sharing anything that could harm the investigation. 

well it WOULD be a new strategy by JQK --- absolutely dogcuss the investigation and MAKE them prove him wrong. Being nice did no good.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Slogger on December 03, 2007, 11:00:53 PM
Unbelievable! 

Aruba wrap the rope around it's neck, stuck it's hand in it's right pocket and jumped off the platform.

They just committed Arubacide.



BOYCOTT ARUBA!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Puzzler on December 03, 2007, 11:01:26 PM
There's something really, really crazy about all of this.

Why would Mos ruin his career like this??

Why would anyone want to hurt 2 parents this way???

Why tell the world you have new evidence and then JQK says they don't have any new evidence??



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on December 03, 2007, 11:01:28 PM
Klaas? Please join us................I need to hear from you. Anybody need a hand to hold? Mine's outreached to all of us and mostly to Natalee's family.

I want so bad to do something for Beth and Dave.   Imagine how they feel, when WE are so devastated!

Group hug? :smt052


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: robots on December 03, 2007, 11:01:29 PM
i sure as heck would like to see WHAT he told the judge the EVIDENCE was

because the JUDGE had to have NEW EVIDENCE to hodl them over

something really stinks


cigars are crushed for now


it is obvious, at this point

that someone got to MOSJERK
The judge in Holland had to review the new evidence in order to send Joran back to Aruba.  That was a big decision.  Can all the initial judges be soooo incorrect (yep, i guess so)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 03, 2007, 11:01:32 PM
Greta said here is what the people don't know.  There were a lot of people who were never questioned in Aruba.

yeah and im sure she has questioned them (cough), if what kelly says is true and the prosecutor said what hurt the case was too much media, i agree with that.
kelly has been no great ball of fire for me, i dont know what went on behind the scenes but he seems like a overpaid mouthpiece.
it aint over till the fat lady sings no matter what kelly and greta say.
i think it is wrong for JQK to come on north american media and say that, or if its true aruba is a bigger disaster than what we all think it is.




I've had moments of feeling JQK might not be the one....but what do I know?  It's like a freaking media circus....at whose cost/loss?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: snoopy on December 03, 2007, 11:01:33 PM
Klaas? Please join us................I need to hear from you. Anybody need a hand to hold? Mine's outreached to all of us and mostly to Natalee's family.

I'm just sick to my stomach, and yes I need a hand to hold.  I'm crushed.  Just whipped.  God Bless Beth, Dave , and family.  Please Dear God bring Natalee home.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2007, 11:02:19 PM
What's this about the ship's log being down? Tim's still going to search, right??

It's not the ships log, it's mearly a blog and the content is temporarily removed.  Tim will fly down once the ship arrives.  The ship is scheduled to arrive between Thursday and Sunday of this week.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 03, 2007, 11:02:36 PM
BOYCOTT ARUBA

CRUSH TOURISM

START TODAY


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 03, 2007, 11:02:37 PM
Greta said here is what the people don't know.  There were a lot of people who were never questioned in Aruba.

yeah and im sure she has questioned them (cough), if what kelly says is true and the prosecutor said what hurt the case was too much media, i agree with that.
kelly has been no great ball of fire for me, i dont know what went on behind the scenes but he seems like a overpaid mouthpiece.
it aint over till the fat lady sings no matter what kelly and greta say.
i think it is wrong for JQK to come on north american media and say that, or if its true aruba is a bigger disaster than what we all think it is.



Dave Holloway
On the Record /w Greta
April 11, 2006


VAN SUSTEREN: Did the media help or hurt you?

HOLLOWAY: Oh, the media was our best friend. If it hadn't been for the media this thing would have been swept under the table the very first day and we'd have been calling back to Aruba "Have you heard anything? Have you heard anything?" I truly believe that.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2007, 11:03:43 PM
Tiny glimmer of hope posted by Lazlo at RU:

Lazlo Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2007 10:55 pm   

Mos about meeting the family: The OM has choosen to be open as possible, but that would go as far as not sharing anything that could harm the investigation. 

well it WOULD be a new strategy by JQK --- absolutely dogcuss the investigation and MAKE them prove him wrong. Being nice did no good.

From Lazlo this is likely a translation from a Dutch article.  Mos talking about the meeting with Beth and Dave.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: AZSunny on December 03, 2007, 11:03:54 PM
I could not have been more wrong. Crushed.
Wreck I am right with you, and when Greta said again "she tends to believe him" I yelled at the TV with the B word.

My heart is breaking for Beth, Dave, Natalee and everyone that loved her. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on December 03, 2007, 11:03:59 PM
There's something really, really crazy about all of this.

Why would Mos ruin his career like this??

Why would anyone want to hurt 2 parents this way???

Why tell the world you have new evidence and then JQK says they don't have any new evidence??



I do believe he tried the best he could, with what he had. So much material evidence disappeared in the beginning and I believe he really wanted to do the right thing, which is why he threw his own neck on the line.  It just didn't worked as he hoped....  Sadly, he just through Aruba in a bigger tailspin.....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 03, 2007, 11:04:11 PM
What did the KLPD say ?
What DEA agent ? WTHeck, I am stunned.
So, did Mos lie B4 ?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: robots on December 03, 2007, 11:04:24 PM
there is HOPE

the problem is that the HOPE is not with MOSS or DOMPIG or anyone involved
from aruba.

sometimes things just happen when you least expect it from an unlikely place or person

we just need to change gears .... lets carry on :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Magnolia on December 03, 2007, 11:04:36 PM
I feel really sick.  I had faith in Mos.  He has said things in interviews
that clearly counter what JQK just said.  What about the tiny bit of new evidence?

What about explosive.

Mos did say EXPLOSIVE NEW EVIDENCE  What on earth was he talking about?
What does the DEA have to do with anything?  The guy volunteered to go
with Beth to the Sloots.
Why did the judge in NL think there was enough new evidence to rearrest
Joran and transport him to Aruba.?
It's all goofy!
Mos sucks
Greta sucks


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 03, 2007, 11:06:07 PM
Greta said here is what the people don't know.  There were a lot of people who were never questioned in Aruba.

yeah and im sure she has questioned them (cough), if what kelly says is true and the prosecutor said what hurt the case was too much media, i agree with that.
kelly has been no great ball of fire for me, i dont know what went on behind the scenes but he seems like a overpaid mouthpiece.
it aint over till the fat lady sings no matter what kelly and greta say.
i think it is wrong for JQK to come on north american media and say that, or if its true aruba is a bigger disaster than what we all think it is.




I've had moments of feeling JQK might not be the one....but what do I know?  It's like a freaking media circus....at whose cost/loss?

So far, the loss is all Natalee's family and Natalee herself.

Aruba has only begun to feel the pain. They have no idea what they've done to themselves. After the shock, we have got to do whatever we can to warn the world about this vacation paradise.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2007, 11:06:12 PM
FWIW - Lazlo appears to believe there is new evidence but that the prosecutor didn't share it with Beth/Dave/JQK.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Dana on December 03, 2007, 11:06:19 PM
Greta said here is what the people don't know.  There were a lot of people who were never questioned in Aruba.

yeah and im sure she has questioned them (cough), if what kelly says is true and the prosecutor said what hurt the case was too much media, i agree with that.
kelly has been no great ball of fire for me, i dont know what went on behind the scenes but he seems like a overpaid mouthpiece.
it aint over till the fat lady sings no matter what kelly and greta say.
i think it is wrong for JQK to come on north american media and say that, or if its true aruba is a bigger disaster than what we all think it is.




I've had moments of feeling JQK might not be the one....but what do I know?  It's like a freaking media circus....at whose cost/loss?

Bottom line is these high price US lawyers have zero say in aruba, they like to have their mug on TV its good PR for them.
Greta is the host of all hosts well in at least her panels mind and she doesnt have the answers either.
Lets see where this goes but coming on national tv and saying its over is way out of line in my opinion. Even if it is over dont keep deflating the family this way.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Puzzler on December 03, 2007, 11:06:21 PM
aruba can go to hell

the dutch can go to hell

and when tourism sinks and then they decide to come clean i will forever even after they do get them all NEVER want anything to do with any of them EVER

somethings are truly unforgiveable

and this is one of them

Totally agree....I just can't imagine having 2 parents come all the way to Aruba to sit and face them and tell them you have NOTHING.  There must be a name for this kind of physchological cruelty.  What kind of person can do that to others desparately seeking the tiniest bit of hope??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Sue on December 03, 2007, 11:06:48 PM


Team Monkeys
We are pissed off and angry , I know I am
But we have a team on a boat heading down ,they need our power of prayer, they need every positive thought and vibe we can send out.. Lets all prayer more then we have ever prayed that they find Natalee..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: igsigs on December 03, 2007, 11:07:17 PM
Tiny glimmer of hope posted by Lazlo at RU:

Lazlo Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2007 10:55 pm   

Mos about meeting the family: The OM has choosen to be open as possible, but that would go as far as not sharing anything that could harm the investigation. 


Thanks Klaas. But...what then? JQK TOTALLY misunderstood Hans? This is bizarre.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: MuffyBee on December 03, 2007, 11:07:42 PM
Greta said here is what the people don't know.  There were a lot of people who were never questioned in Aruba.

yeah and im sure she has questioned them (cough), if what kelly says is true and the prosecutor said what hurt the case was too much media, i agree with that.
kelly has been no great ball of fire for me, i dont know what went on behind the scenes but he seems like a overpaid mouthpiece.
it aint over till the fat lady sings no matter what kelly and greta say.
i think it is wrong for JQK to come on north american media and say that, or if its true aruba is a bigger disaster than what we all think it is.




I've had moments of feeling JQK might not be the one....but what do I know?  It's like a freaking media circus....at whose cost/loss?

Bottom line is these high price US lawyers have zero say in aruba, they like to have their mug on TV its good PR for them.
Greta is the host of all hosts well in at least her panels mind and she doesnt have the answers either.
Lets see where this goes but coming on national tv and saying its over is way out of line in my opinion. Even if it is over dont keep deflating the family this way.



I agree here with you Dana.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Flmom47 on December 03, 2007, 11:07:51 PM
Could someone please post a link to the candlesite...I want to light a candle and send prayers for Dave, Beth and the family and  that God will light the path so Tim and the search team can find Natalee to bring her home to Alabama.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2007, 11:07:53 PM
IMO, the only reason they asked to her come to Aruba was to question her, not to share information with her.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: snoopy on December 03, 2007, 11:08:07 PM


Somethings not right hear ya'll.  I just can't give up yet.  I can't.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Puzzler on December 03, 2007, 11:08:41 PM
There's something really, really crazy about all of this.

Why would Mos ruin his career like this??

Why would anyone want to hurt 2 parents this way???

Why tell the world you have new evidence and then JQK says they don't have any new evidence??



I do believe he tried the best he could, with what he had. So much material evidence disappeared in the beginning and I believe he really wanted to do the right thing, which is why he threw his own neck on the line.  It just didn't worked as he hoped....  Sadly, he just through Aruba in a bigger tailspin.....

For all his experience, maybe he's never had to deal with this much evil


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Kermit on December 03, 2007, 11:08:45 PM
there is HOPE

the problem is that the HOPE is not with MOSS or DOMPIG or anyone involved
from aruba.

sometimes things just happen when you least expect it from an unlikely place or person

we just need to change gears .... lets carry on :cool:

The voice of reason.

Expect the unexpected.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 03, 2007, 11:09:08 PM
Mos did say the boats finding Natalee would help his case....and, maybe the taps are still in place...(wishful thinking)....this is all so crazy...and I do agree....why use the word explosive...why all the MEDIA reports from Mos? 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: wreck on December 03, 2007, 11:09:12 PM
FWIW - Lazlo appears to believe there is new evidence but that the prosecutor didn't share it with Beth/Dave/JQK.
Like I said a few posts back -- maybe this is JQK's only tactic -- turn up the HEAT on MOS. This is the last chance -- be absolutely CERTAIN MOS is committed to saving his own face.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: robots on December 03, 2007, 11:09:22 PM
FWIW - Lazlo appears to believe there is new evidence but that the prosecutor didn't share it with Beth/Dave/JQK.

that is possible and yet WHY not share it with them

of all people that have a RIGHT to know

MOS can BURN in hell as far as im concerned and IF he does get a conviction because
he is playing games i will grant a pass out


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: snoopy on December 03, 2007, 11:09:36 PM
FWIW - Lazlo appears to believe there is new evidence but that the prosecutor didn't share it with Beth/Dave/JQK.

It has to be.  It just has to be.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 03, 2007, 11:10:03 PM
I could not have been more wrong. Crushed.
Wreck I am right with you, and when Greta said again "she tends to believe him" I yelled at the TV with the B word.

My heart is breaking for Beth, Dave, Natalee and everyone that loved her. 

AZ, did you feel that she was taking freshly reopened wounds and pouring a box of salt on them? That's exactly how I felt. As Greta led up to saying she was still inclined to believe Joran, I knew where she was going and literally cringed for Beth.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2007, 11:10:05 PM
Tiny glimmer of hope posted by Lazlo at RU:

Lazlo Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2007 10:55 pm   

Mos about meeting the family: The OM has choosen to be open as possible, but that would go as far as not sharing anything that could harm the investigation. 


Thanks Klaas. But...what then? JQK TOTALLY misunderstood Hans? This is bizarre.

Lazlo believes Hans chose not to share the new information with JQK.  So JQK didn't misuderstand Hans, Hans just didn't show all he had.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: robots on December 03, 2007, 11:10:26 PM
if mos has it - share it with Beth and Dave

do not torture them more

please for goodness sakes



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: robots on December 03, 2007, 11:12:03 PM
Tiny glimmer of hope posted by Lazlo at RU:

Lazlo Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2007 10:55 pm   

Mos about meeting the family: The OM has choosen to be open as possible, but that would go as far as not sharing anything that could harm the investigation. 


Thanks Klaas. But...what then? JQK TOTALLY misunderstood Hans? This is bizarre.

Lazlo believes Hans chose not to share the new information with JQK.  So JQK didn't misuderstand Hans, Hans just didn't show all he had.

it is possible

i suppose

but still-----------------what a JERK


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: San on December 03, 2007, 11:12:04 PM
There's something really, really crazy about all of this.

Why would Mos ruin his career like this??

Why would anyone want to hurt 2 parents this way???

Why tell the world you have new evidence and then JQK says they don't have any new evidence??



I do believe he tried the best he could, with what he had. So much material evidence disappeared in the beginning and I believe he really wanted to do the right thing, which is why he threw his own neck on the line.  It just didn't worked as he hoped....  Sadly, he just through Aruba in a bigger tailspin.....

For all his experience, maybe he's never had to deal with this much evil

What is one man and one family to do when they have an entire goverment and maybe two governments against them.  This was an uphill battle since day one.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 03, 2007, 11:12:06 PM
FWIW - Lazlo appears to believe there is new evidence but that the prosecutor didn't share it with Beth/Dave/JQK.

It has to be.  It just has to be.

Snoopy, I WANT to believe, and I'm an eternal optimist, but I have to wonder why Mos wouldn't have just told them that there was evidence they couldn't discuss.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 03, 2007, 11:12:53 PM
Could someone please post a link to the candlesite...I want to light a candle and send prayers for Dave, Beth and the family and  that God will light the path so Tim and the search team can find Natalee to bring her home to Alabama.

here it is...

http://www.gratefulness.org/candles/candles.cfm?l=eng&gi=NAH


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 03, 2007, 11:13:05 PM
there is HOPE

the problem is that the HOPE is not with MOSS or DOMPIG or anyone involved
from aruba.

sometimes things just happen when you least expect it from an unlikely place or person

we just need to change gears .... lets carry on :cool:

Thanks you Robots.  I agree.

Once the case is closed ... maybe Monkey could organize and put pressure on various levels of the American administration to investigate the corrupt investigation that has denied an American citizen justice and ... put an American family through a H--- on Earth.

Janet



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: MuffyBee on December 03, 2007, 11:13:10 PM
Could someone please post a link to the candlesite...I want to light a candle and send prayers for Dave, Beth and the family and  that God will light the path so Tim and the search team can find Natalee to bring her home to Alabama.

I don't have the link, but will search for it and post when I find it if no one else gets to it first.  I think we should have the candlesite for Natalee on a thread, so we can find it.  And keep the candles burning!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Observer on December 03, 2007, 11:13:20 PM
The Cover Up is nearly complete

The Dutch analyzed it all and thought it would be far worse for Aruban tourism if they exposed the truth and everyone involved.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: robots on December 03, 2007, 11:13:23 PM
the only thing good to come of this is - everyone now knows

DO NOT GO TO ARUBA - they will THROW you AWAY like GARBAGE

i hate them all


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: MuffyBee on December 03, 2007, 11:14:07 PM
Could someone please post a link to the candlesite...I want to light a candle and send prayers for Dave, Beth and the family and  that God will light the path so Tim and the search team can find Natalee to bring her home to Alabama.

here it is...

http://www.gratefulness.org/candles/candles.cfm?l=eng&gi=NAH

Thank you 2NJSons_Mom.  I think we need to put this candle link where we can access it easily, particularly during these trying times.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Kermit on December 03, 2007, 11:14:11 PM
Klaas? Please join us................I need to hear from you. Anybody need a hand to hold? Mine's outreached to all of us and mostly to Natalee's family.


>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>pull my finger


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: casa on December 03, 2007, 11:14:47 PM
Greta said here is what the people don't know.  There were a lot of people who were never questioned in Aruba.

yeah and im sure she has questioned them (cough), if what kelly says is true and the prosecutor said what hurt the case was too much media, i agree with that.
kelly has been no great ball of fire for me, i dont know what went on behind the scenes but he seems like a overpaid mouthpiece.
it aint over till the fat lady sings no matter what kelly and greta say.
i think it is wrong for JQK to come on north american media and say that, or if its true aruba is a bigger disaster than what we all think it is.




I've had moments of feeling JQK might not be the one....but what do I know?  It's like a freaking media circus....at whose cost/loss?

Bottom line is these high price US lawyers have zero say in aruba, they like to have their mug on TV its good PR for them.
Greta is the host of all hosts well in at least her panels mind and she doesnt have the answers either.
Lets see where this goes but coming on national tv and saying its over is way out of line in my opinion. Even if it is over dont keep deflating the family this way.



Apparently it is not the "high price US lawyers" who have deflated the family.  I'm sure that JQK knows more than we do.  After all HE was there with Beth this week end when she talked to the prosecutor.  Don't get me wrong, I want this solved as much as anyone.  This appears to me to be another case of incompetence.  I think the prosecutors thought maybe the boys would talk if they put them back in jail.  Apparently they did not.  For Mos to tell Greta that the reason the investigation failed was because of the family and the media is a very telling statement to me.  It shows that he is NO better than the incompetent, blame giving people in charge before this.  It's all about blaming someone else but not anyone on Aruba.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on December 03, 2007, 11:14:53 PM
FWIW - Lazlo appears to believe there is new evidence but that the prosecutor didn't share it with Beth/Dave/JQK.

Well, that's the only hope left, but you'd think he'd let them know not to worry, he has evidence he can't share, just trust him?  Why send them home with no hope or comfort?  I wonder what Beth shared with Mos, that he may not have known before.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: robots on December 03, 2007, 11:15:08 PM
there is HOPE

the problem is that the HOPE is not with MOSS or DOMPIG or anyone involved
from aruba.

sometimes things just happen when you least expect it from an unlikely place or person

we just need to change gears .... lets carry on :cool:

Thanks you Robots.  I agree.

Once the case is closed ... maybe Monkey could organize and put pressure on various levels of the American administration to investigate the corrupt investigation that has denied an American citizen justice and ... put an American family through a H--- on Earth.

Janet



yep  - there is Hope and sometimes hope needs a little boost from people to help it get going

just need to try a different angle


never give  up - ever





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Puzzler on December 03, 2007, 11:15:27 PM
FWIW - Lazlo appears to believe there is new evidence but that the prosecutor didn't share it with Beth/Dave/JQK.

It has to be.  It just has to be.

Then why not just say he has new evidence that he can't share?  No...JQK said he had no answers for them from the very beginning of their questions.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 03, 2007, 11:15:53 PM
The Cover Up is nearly complete

The Dutch analyzed it all and thought it would be far worse for Aruban tourism if they exposed the real truth.

Yes, *******. Sadly, yes. Let's prove them wrong.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 03, 2007, 11:16:32 PM
Could someone please post a link to the candlesite...I want to light a candle and send prayers for Dave, Beth and the family and  that God will light the path so Tim and the search team can find Natalee to bring her home to Alabama.

I don't have the link, but will search for it and post when I find it if no one else gets to it first.  I think we should have the candlesite for Natalee on a thread, so we can find it.  And keep the candles burning!

I posted it, MuffyBee, but agree about a thread where it can be found....guess I could have made one, myself...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2007, 11:16:55 PM
Klaas? Please join us................I need to hear from you. Anybody need a hand to hold? Mine's outreached to all of us and mostly to Natalee's family.


>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>pull my finger

Kermit - what do you think?  Lazlo thinks Hans didn't show JQK the new evidence, that he's holding back for the sake of the case?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1/2007
Post by: Puzzler on December 03, 2007, 11:17:51 PM
Tiny glimmer of hope posted by Lazlo at RU:

Lazlo Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2007 10:55 pm   

Mos about meeting the family: The OM has choosen to be open as possible, but that would go as far as not sharing anything that could harm the investigation. 


Thanks Klaas. But...what then? JQK TOTALLY misunderstood Hans? This is bizarre.

Lazlo believes Hans chose not to share the new information with JQK.  So JQK didn't misuderstand Hans, Hans just didn't show all he had.

it is possible

i suppose

but still-----------------what a JERK

Harm the case?!? It really sounds like there is nothing to share...no answers


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1 - 12/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2007, 11:17:54 PM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub2/1LOCKED.gif)

Please move to NCD #700

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2417.0


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1 - 12/3/2007
Post by: Blue Moon on December 03, 2007, 11:18:02 PM
The thing about this that really bothers me is that JQK HAS NEVER spoke unkindly about this whole deal. Nothing. He has always keep his mouth tight when it came to criticizing the pros. and ale.  Tonight he did not hold back.  He has never done that before.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #699 12/1 - 12/3/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 03, 2007, 11:18:38 PM
Has Red spoken with Beth?