Scared Monkeys Discussion Forum

Natalee Holloway => LCD Archive => Topic started by: San on December 08, 2007, 02:53:38 PM



Title: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8 - 12/11//2007
Post by: San on December 08, 2007, 02:53:38 PM
(http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d118/Sanddrops/Scared%20Monkeys/NataleeFirstPage.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 08, 2007, 06:29:54 PM
CBB - PLEASE CHECK YOUR MESSAGES


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 08, 2007, 06:29:56 PM
Now.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 08, 2007, 06:30:00 PM
 :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: San on December 08, 2007, 06:30:31 PM
Thank you everyone for helping me get to page 50 :D


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Observer on December 08, 2007, 06:32:25 PM
I found a tiny bit more of casino video at abc. It appears that Joran may be communicating with the man sitting next to Natalee and the girl next to him points to him afterwards. Then Joran turns and talks to her. Also I believe this confirms what we all thought and that is not Guido. No question once again in this short clip they are hiding the identity of that man next to Natalee. Many of the stills his eyes and other features are blacked out.

http://abcnews.go.com/Video/playerIndex?id=3922731&affil=wlne

(http://img412.imageshack.us/img412/279/casino1cn5.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)
(http://img530.imageshack.us/img530/1246/casino2lj6.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)
(http://img402.imageshack.us/img402/8677/casino3op4.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)
(http://img402.imageshack.us/img402/5595/casino4dy7.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: San on December 08, 2007, 06:34:39 PM
******* in that picture you can really tell it is Paulus.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 08, 2007, 06:36:13 PM
Nice clear shots ******* - thanks


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 08, 2007, 06:36:31 PM
http://blog.al.com/spotnews/2007/12/suspects_release_no_surprise_t.html

++++++++++

Suspect's release no surprise to Natalee Holloway's parents, lawyer says
Posted by MIKE CASON December 08, 2007 7:36 AM


The parents of Natalee Holloway were not surprised Friday at the release of Joran van der Sloot by Aruban authorities because their attorney had warned them not to believe there was new evidence in her disappearance, the attorney said.

Attorney John Q. Kelly of New York said he expects an announcement later this month that there will be no prosecution of van der Sloot or the other two suspects, Deepak and Satish Kalpoe, who were released Dec. 1. Kelly represents Beth Holloway and Dave Holloway.

"The report of significant new incriminating evidence was misleading," Kelly said. "It was the same evidence or lack of evidence they had from the very beginning."

Kelly said his clients would not comment on van der Sloot's release. Telephone messages left Friday with the Holloways were not returned.

Authorities re-arrested van der Sloot and the Kalpoe brothers Nov. 21 after finding what they described as "new incriminating evidence" in Natalee Holloway's disappearance.

"It's all a dog and pony show," Kelly said. "I guess they thought it would be good PR to show they were still working on the case. But it amplifies the fact that they mishandled it from the beginning and continue to mishandle it."

Natalee Holloway was last seen May 30, 2005, leaving a bar in Aruba with van der Sloot and the Kalpoe brothers.

All three men have denied a role in the Mountain Brook High School graduate's disappearance. Van der Sloot has said he left her alone on a beach that night but does not know what happened to her.

Van der Sloot's attorney, Joe Tacopina, told The Associated Press on Friday, "It's been a long road, and we're very relieved and feel very much vindicated."

No trace of Natalee Holloway has been found despite extensive searches.

Kelly said Dave Holloway hopes a new search off the coast of Aruba will yield answers. A private boat owner is providing divers and equipment to conduct the search in deeper waters than authorities previously searched.

"It might yield some additional information," Kelly said. "It might at least give them some closure if they're able to bring Natalee's body home."

Kelly said the search boat has been delayed by bad weather but is expected to arrive in Aruba by Wednesday.

Kelly said it is likely that Friday's release of van der Sloot ends chances for a criminal prosecution.

"I'm sure by the end of the year the prosecutor will announce he's decided not to try the suspects on the evidence he has," Kelly said. "Since clearly they don't have enough to hold them, they don't have enough to prosecute them."

The Associated Press contributed to this report. mcason@bhamnews.com


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 08, 2007, 06:39:50 PM
******* in that picture you can really tell it is Paulus.

Slumps his shoulders the same exact way.  Habits die hard.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: robots on December 08, 2007, 06:40:25 PM
thats him


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Helen Back on December 08, 2007, 06:41:13 PM
Wow, *******, those shots are so clear.  It's clearly Paulus.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on December 08, 2007, 06:41:53 PM
Quote from: KarmaRoundUp on Today at 06:11:40 PM
Art Wood
'Rita Cosby Live & Direct'
December 1, 2005

ART WOOD, FORMER SECRET SERVICE AGENT: Absolutely. Absolutely. There's a lot that Americans can do through the State Department. I want to remind everybody that Natalee Holloway was a U.S. citizen. Once the Aruban authorities are done investigating this case, the FBI can still conduct an investigation.

I would like to know,once and for all,IF this is true.
Hi Monkeys

Klaas:
I would like to know too.  I'm affraid if we ask 3 different people we'll get 3 different answers.
 :gaah:
Got stuck on the last thread.I hear you Klaas.
 :smt102


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: private eye on December 08, 2007, 06:44:13 PM
So does everyone think that is Paulus next to Natalee at the casino? Have her friends been asked if that was him? Has he ever been asked if that was him?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 08, 2007, 06:45:17 PM
******* in that picture you can really tell it is Paulus.


I have to agree!! Nice find...I was never certain before, but just looky at this. Nice find *******, nice!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: San on December 08, 2007, 06:47:37 PM
What if Guido was the dealer at the next table.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: dennisintn on December 08, 2007, 06:47:52 PM

waterboard
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 08, 2007, 06:48:18 PM
I've checked Klaas, and responded! I think I did it, I've been in there a lot today!  :2doh: :2doh:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Frank on December 08, 2007, 06:49:47 PM
Jesus Christ, this is amazing.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 08, 2007, 06:50:28 PM
So does everyone think that is Paulus next to Natalee at the casino? Have her friends been asked if that was him? Has he ever been asked if that was him?

I don't know if her friends have been asked.  I certainly wouldn't believe HIM if he were asked. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Auntiem on December 08, 2007, 06:51:08 PM
So does everyone think that is Paulus next to Natalee at the casino? Have her friends been asked if that was him? Has he ever been asked if that was him?

  That has always been my question PI.  It sure looks like him to me, but could be confirmed by Natalee's friends, they were there, they saw and obviously talked to him.  Especially, due to the fact he has always denied it was him, a confirmation from them would seal it, and give more suspicion to Paulus being involved.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Frank on December 08, 2007, 06:54:32 PM
Add this to the caption:

Superior Court
January, 2007

The possible involvement of Paulus with that could then be deducted from the file with the official reports of witnesses, amongst which two people suggested a contact existed between Paulus and Natalee Holloway the night of her disappearance, and a taped report (that was given by the Prosecutor in her final note 1 to the Court). The taped information and his declaration that he picked up Joran and Natalee by the McDonalds Palm Beach and brought them to the Holiday Inn, are clearly understood by the Dept. of Justice, and could in the judgement of this Superior Court, be considered as an indication of the involvement of Paulus in the disappearance of Natalee Holloway.”


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Observer on December 08, 2007, 06:55:49 PM
Natalee looks happy as can be as her friend leans over to talk to her.

(http://img517.imageshack.us/img517/725/casino5zw7.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 08, 2007, 06:56:16 PM
Quote from: KarmaRoundUp on Today at 06:11:40 PM
Art Wood
'Rita Cosby Live & Direct'
December 1, 2005

ART WOOD, FORMER SECRET SERVICE AGENT: Absolutely. Absolutely. There's a lot that Americans can do through the State Department. I want to remind everybody that Natalee Holloway was a U.S. citizen. Once the Aruban authorities are done investigating this case, the FBI can still conduct an investigation.

I would like to know,once and for all,IF this is true.
Hi Monkeys

Klaas:
I would like to know too.  I'm affraid if we ask 3 different people we'll get 3 different answers.
 :gaah:
Got stuck on the last thread.I hear you Klaas.
 :smt102


Art Wood
DANA PRETZER
July 2, 2006 - Part 1
July 8, 2006 - Part 2

http://sundaynightsatellite.libsyn.com/index.php?post_year=2006&post_month=07

Art:

The family of Natalee needs to put pressure on the US attorney in Birmingham to push the FBI to conduct an investigation after ALE close the case. We have a treaty that allows the FBI to pursue a violation of civil rights of an american citizen there.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 08, 2007, 06:56:42 PM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/CasinoPVDS.jpg)

White shirt/tan pants

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/pvdscar1.jpg)

White shirt/white pants

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/pvds8.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 08, 2007, 06:57:57 PM
Klaas ... the dates in my post should be 2006.  Would you please do your thing.

I apologize.

Thank you.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: San on December 08, 2007, 06:58:46 PM
Klaas, it looks like he is even wearing his glasses.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 08, 2007, 07:03:37 PM
******* in that picture you can really tell it is Paulus.

Slumps his shoulders the same exact way.  Habits die hard.

mmmmmm........I was just thinking that...can we get som shoulder shots?? I will see what I have.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 08, 2007, 07:03:45 PM
I'm BACK! and I'm PRO!  :lol: Thanks, Klaas! I did it!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 08, 2007, 07:05:22 PM
Klaas, it looks like he is even wearing his glasses.

Yep.  I think he's wearing the white shirt/white pants, what do you think?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 08, 2007, 07:06:17 PM
I'm BACK! and I'm PRO!  :lol: Thanks, Klaas! I did it!

Yippee!  Thanks CBB, now you won't have that problem again!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Puzzler on December 08, 2007, 07:06:22 PM
I found a tiny bit more of casino video at abc. It appears that Joran may be communicating with the man sitting next to Natalee and the girl next to him points to him afterwards. Then Joran turns and talks to her. Also I believe this confirms what we all thought and that is not Guido. No question once again in this short clip they are hiding the identity of that man next to Natalee. Many of the stills his eyes and other features are blacked out.

http://abcnews.go.com/Video/playerIndex?id=3922731&affil=wlne

(http://img412.imageshack.us/img412/279/casino1cn5.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)
(http://img530.imageshack.us/img530/1246/casino2lj6.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)
(http://img402.imageshack.us/img402/8677/casino3op4.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)
(http://img402.imageshack.us/img402/5595/casino4dy7.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)

In these pictures, look at Paulus' posture - slight tilt of chair toward Natalee and his arm is in a position that it would be easy for him to turn more easily toward Natalee than to face forward (face forward, most likely would have the arm toward the table more and elbow down toward his lap)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 08, 2007, 07:07:32 PM
Klaas, it looks like he is even wearing his glasses.


I see the glasses in the clearer shots too!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 08, 2007, 07:10:27 PM
Hate to leave now but I have to go to a birthday party, will be back later.  Keep working on it!

See you all later!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 08, 2007, 07:11:10 PM
Add this to the caption:

Superior Court
January, 2007

The possible involvement of Paulus with that could then be deducted from the file with the official reports of witnesses, amongst which two people suggested a contact existed between Paulus and Natalee Holloway the night of her disappearance, and a taped report (that was given by the Prosecutor in her final note 1 to the Court). The taped information  and his declaration that he picked up Joran and Natalee by the McDonalds Palm Beach and brought them to the Holiday Inn, are clearly understood by the Dept. of Justice, and could in the judgement of this Superior Court, be considered as an indication of the involvement of Paulus in the disappearance of Natalee Holloway.”

Frank ... I do believe that the "taped" report that the Superior Court referred to was the casino video recording that appears to be Natalee and Paulus in conversation at the Black Jack table.  I suspect that the casino tape as well Paulus' own declaration in front of witnesses on the morning of May 31, 2005 which implied that he picked up Joran and Natalee at McDonalds on the morning Natalee went missing ... are the reasons that the awarded compensation by a previous judge/court was reversed and ... Paulus' detention was deemed justified.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Observer on December 08, 2007, 07:12:10 PM
Yes I think it is PVDS also. Body posture,Clothes and a uncanny resemblance especially his hair. Every frame I looked at where he was in plain view someone doctored his face. I find that very suspicious. Just like the other few seconds of video in the casino the man goes to town on his drink. Seems like it was strong by the way he puts his head down afterwards after the long drink.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on December 08, 2007, 07:12:15 PM
Quote from: KarmaRoundUp on Today at 06:11:40 PM
Art Wood
'Rita Cosby Live & Direct'
December 1, 2005

ART WOOD, FORMER SECRET SERVICE AGENT: Absolutely. Absolutely. There's a lot that Americans can do through the State Department. I want to remind everybody that Natalee Holloway was a U.S. citizen. Once the Aruban authorities are done investigating this case, the FBI can still conduct an investigation.

I would like to know,once and for all,IF this is true.
Hi Monkeys

Klaas:
I would like to know too.  I'm affraid if we ask 3 different people we'll get 3 different answers.
 :gaah:
Got stuck on the last thread.I hear you Klaas.
 :smt102


Art Wood
DANA PRETZER
July 2, 2006 - Part 1
July 8, 2006 - Part 2

http://sundaynightsatellite.libsyn.com/index.php?post_year=2006&post_month=07

Art:

The family of Natalee needs to put pressure on the US attorney in Birmingham to push the FBI to conduct an investigation after ALE close the case. We have a treaty that allows the FBI to pursue a violation of civil rights of an american citizen there.
Thanks Janet.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: San on December 08, 2007, 07:13:01 PM
Klaas, it looks like he is even wearing his glasses.

Yep.  I think he's wearing the white shirt/white pants, what do you think?

It looks like he is wearing the lite tan pans.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 08, 2007, 07:13:18 PM
Klaas ... the dates in my post should be 2006.  Would you please do your thing.

I apologize.

Thank you.

Janet

Klaas

Thank you and ... have fun at the birthday party.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: private eye on December 08, 2007, 07:15:17 PM
But despite all of the obvious circumstantial evidence, implied involvement, apparent and admitted lying by those with implied involvement, interrupted meltdowns where witnesses, US and Aruban have confirmed that Joran said something went wrong and she was buried by one of the brothers, the taped conversation of the boys in the police vehicle corroborating to a degree their involvement, there is nothing that constitutes evidence of a specific crime? And as Dompiq said, and being one who witnessed the meltdown, it is obvious to all that the boys are guilty as hell, we just don't know what specific crime and thus cannot prosecute them for anything.

Maybe Clinton isn't everyones favorite, and that is understandable, and I am sure there are other people just as educated, knowledgeable of law, world politics, international laws, and the tools available to affect justice in a case like this, it seems to me that unless someone like him adopts this cause, legal recourse against the boys is doubtful. I am not sure where I am going with this, but I think Beth and or her friends from Birmingham, should reach out to him, regardless of politics, for may a private consultation. Not because of his politics, but because of the knowledge he learned thru his experience in the White House, his total grasp of how the world functions and the brilliance with which God blessed him. Bush has done a lot of good, and is the kind of guy who would help if he could, and he is certainly brilliant in his on right, but it is a different kind of brilliance from Clinton. Of course, the elder Bush might have that kind of understanding due to his education and years of experience prior to and in the White House.

All I know is Beth needs someone with a vast understanding to help. Any other suggestions, names?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 08, 2007, 07:15:46 PM
Klaas ... the dates in my post should be 2006.  Would you please do your thing.

I apologize.

Thank you.

Janet

Klaas

Thank you and ... have fun at the birthday party.

Janet

San actually fixed your typo before I could get to it, LOL.  Thanks, I will!  My mother inlaws birthday  :D


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: San on December 08, 2007, 07:15:53 PM
Yes I think it is PVDS also. Body posture,Clothes and a uncanny resemblance especially his hair. Every frame I looked at where he was in plain view someone doctored his face. I find that very suspicious. Just like the other few seconds of video in the casino the man goes to town on his drink. Seems like it was strong by the way he puts his head down afterwards after the long drink.

Paulus is a drunk and I will guarantee he was drunk that night.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 08, 2007, 07:17:20 PM
Quote from: KarmaRoundUp on Today at 06:11:40 PM
Art Wood
'Rita Cosby Live & Direct'
December 1, 2005

ART WOOD, FORMER SECRET SERVICE AGENT: Absolutely. Absolutely. There's a lot that Americans can do through the State Department. I want to remind everybody that Natalee Holloway was a U.S. citizen. Once the Aruban authorities are done investigating this case, the FBI can still conduct an investigation.

I would like to know,once and for all,IF this is true.
Hi Monkeys

Klaas:
I would like to know too.  I'm affraid if we ask 3 different people we'll get 3 different answers.
 :gaah:
Got stuck on the last thread.I hear you Klaas.
 :smt102


Art Wood
DANA PRETZER
July 2, 2006 - Part 1
July 8, 2006 - Part 2

http://sundaynightsatellite.libsyn.com/index.php?post_year=2006&post_month=07

Art:

The family of Natalee needs to put pressure on the US attorney in Birmingham to push the FBI to conduct an investigation after ALE close the case. We have a treaty that allows the FBI to pursue a violation of civil rights of an american citizen there.
Thanks Janet.

Karma ... I have save a copy of the treaty and related provision reference somewhere in a file on my disorganized desktop files.   :)

I am off now but ... will attempt to find it tomorrow afternoon and ... post accordingly

Have nice evening Monkeys.

Janet

4:20 PM


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 08, 2007, 07:19:36 PM
Klaas ... the dates in my post should be 2006.  Would you please do your thing.

I apologize.

Thank you.

Janet

Klaas

Thank you and ... have fun at the birthday party.

Janet

San actually fixed your typo before I could get to it, LOL.  Thanks, I will!  My mother inlaws birthday  :D

THANKS SAN!!

Now if you mods would only give me the option to edit my posts ...    :roll:

Janet



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: San on December 08, 2007, 07:20:56 PM
Klaas ... the dates in my post should be 2006.  Would you please do your thing.

I apologize.

Thank you.

Janet

Klaas

Thank you and ... have fun at the birthday party.

Janet

San actually fixed your typo before I could get to it, LOL.  Thanks, I will!  My mother inlaws birthday  :D

THANKS SAN!!

Now if you mods would only give me the option to edit my posts ...    :roll:

Janet



I don't have the power to give you those options.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: private eye on December 08, 2007, 07:23:05 PM
I have only briefly met some of Beth's and or Jugs friends in Birmingham, and they come across as unpretentious, ordinary, down to earth, friendly, and extremely like able people, some or the group as a whole seem to have connections, obviously. Probably republican though huh:)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 08, 2007, 07:24:25 PM
Klaas ... the dates in my post should be 2006.  Would you please do your thing.

I apologize.

Thank you.

Janet

Klaas

Thank you and ... have fun at the birthday party.

Janet

San actually fixed your typo before I could get to it, LOL.  Thanks, I will!  My mother inlaws birthday  :D

THANKS SAN!!

Now if you mods would only give me the option to edit my posts ...    :roll:

Janet



I don't have the power to give you those options.

Who are the "powers that be" who are in control.   :lol:

Gotta go!

Good Bye.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 08, 2007, 07:26:06 PM
The man who looks like or  is Paulus appears also to have a CAMERA in front of him.

 :shock:



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Observer on December 08, 2007, 07:29:48 PM
(http://img129.imageshack.us/img129/8895/capta87b92480ed84807b7dgx3.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)
Paulus van der Sloot, forensic scientist Michael Archer, Anita van der Sloot and attorney Joseph Tacopina are seen early Friday, Dec. 7, 2007, before the release of Joran van der Sloot, in Oranjestad, Aruba. A judge in Aruba ordered the release Friday of the last of three suspects re-arrested last month in the disappearance of American teenager Natalee Holloway, ruling the evidence was not strong enough to continue holding him.
---------------------------------
(http://img510.imageshack.us/img510/4848/capt6aa55ae3cc974d8bb45jf5.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)
Anita van der Sloot, left, reacts as her attorney Rosemarie Arnold givers her the news of the release of her son Joran van der Sloot, Friday, Dec. 7, 2007, in Oranjestad, Aruba. A judge in Aruba ordered the release Friday of the last of three suspects re-arrested last month in the disappearance of American teenager Natalee Holloway, ruling the evidence was not strong enough to continue holding him


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 08, 2007, 07:29:55 PM
I have only briefly met some of Beth's and or Jugs friends in Birmingham, and they come across as unpretentious, ordinary, down to earth, friendly, and extremely like able people, some or the group as a whole seem to have connections, obviously. Probably republican though huh:)


We can only hope that they are!

 :D



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Magnolia on December 08, 2007, 07:30:26 PM
If I recall...Bill Clinton has already shown interest in the case.
An FBI agent that was on Aruba talked to Clinton about seeing
a Green Bay Packers poster in Joran's room and Clinton talked
to Bret Favre about meeting with Joran to try to get him to confess.

Beth has turned to Condaleeza Rice and Jug said that Bush was
his man so possibably that side would be a better bet.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: NYC_lover on December 08, 2007, 07:31:12 PM
But despite all of the obvious circumstantial evidence, implied involvement, apparent and admitted lying by those with implied involvement, interrupted meltdowns where witnesses, US and Aruban have confirmed that Joran said something went wrong and she was buried by one of the brothers, the taped conversation of the boys in the police vehicle corroborating to a degree their involvement, there is nothing that constitutes evidence of a specific crime? And as Dompiq said, and being one who witnessed the meltdown, it is obvious to all that the boys are guilty as hell, we just don't know what specific crime and thus cannot prosecute them for anything.

Maybe Clinton isn't everyones favorite, and that is understandable, and I am sure there are other people just as educated, knowledgeable of law, world politics, international laws, and the tools available to affect justice in a case like this, it seems to me that unless someone like him adopts this cause, legal recourse against the boys is doubtful. I am not sure where I am going with this, but I think Beth and or her friends from Birmingham, should reach out to him, regardless of politics, for may a private consultation. Not because of his politics, but because of the knowledge he learned thru his experience in the White House, his total grasp of how the world functions and the brilliance with which God blessed him. Bush has done a lot of good, and is the kind of guy who would help if he could, and he is certainly brilliant in his on right, but it is a different kind of brilliance from Clinton. Of course, the elder Bush might have that kind of understanding due to his education and years of experience prior to and in the White House.

All I know is Beth needs someone with a vast understanding to help. Any other suggestions, names?

Private eye - No idea about suggestions names. What kind of things must this person have?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Scandi on December 08, 2007, 07:31:39 PM
Hi Everyone,  The one hope I have now after the disappointment of Joran being released is that hopefully they will now find Natalee.  The ship should be in place, right?  Has there been any word about what is happening with the search?  Thanks  ;}


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 08, 2007, 07:33:49 PM
ACKKKKKKKKKKKKKK IS PAULUS's FLY UNZIPPED!! :shock:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 08, 2007, 07:37:00 PM
Klaas ... the dates in my post should be 2006.  Would you please do your thing.

I apologize.

Thank you.

Janet

Klaas

Thank you and ... have fun at the birthday party.

Janet

San actually fixed your typo before I could get to it, LOL.  Thanks, I will!  My mother inlaws birthday  :D

THANKS SAN!!

Now if you mods would only give me the option to edit my posts ...    :roll:

Janet



I don't have the power to give you those options.

Who are the "powers that be" who are in control.   :lol:

Gotta go!

Good Bye.

Janet

Well, BLAH can edit MY posts!!!  How does that work?  Must be one of those Teacher's Pet situations, huh?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: dennisintn on December 08, 2007, 07:37:04 PM
(http://img129.imageshack.us/img129/8895/capta87b92480ed84807b7dgx3.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)
Paulus van der Sloot, forensic scientist Michael Archer, Anita van der Sloot and attorney Joseph Tacopina are seen early Friday, Dec. 7, 2007, before the release of Joran van der Sloot, in Oranjestad, Aruba. A judge in Aruba ordered the release Friday of the last of three suspects re-arrested last month in the disappearance of American teenager Natalee Holloway, ruling the evidence was not strong enough to continue holding him.
---------------------------------
(http://img510.imageshack.us/img510/4848/capt6aa55ae3cc974d8bb45jf5.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)
Anita van der Sloot, left, reacts as her attorney Rosemarie Arnold givers her the news of the release of her son Joran van der Sloot, Friday, Dec. 7, 2007, in Oranjestad, Aruba. A judge in Aruba ordered the release Friday of the last of three suspects re-arrested last month in the disappearance of American teenager Natalee Holloway, ruling the evidence was not strong enough to continue holding him

and what do you think a forensic scientist would be advising them on?  possible evidence that could be found on a body after being in the ocean for 3l mos? 
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Magnolia on December 08, 2007, 07:37:26 PM
Where's Robots?   Joe T. has man boobs!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Observer on December 08, 2007, 07:37:29 PM
ACKKKKKKKKKKKKKK IS PAULUS's FLY UNZIPPED!! :shock:

Why does he have a forensic scientist??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Magnolia on December 08, 2007, 07:42:49 PM
Hi Everyone,  The one hope I have now after the disappointment of Joran being released is that hopefully they will now find Natalee.  The ship should be in place, right?  Has there been any word about what is happening with the search?  Thanks  ;}

Scandi, the ship is experiencing weather delay...stuck in 14-18 foot seas.
They do not expect to arrive until Wednesday.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 08, 2007, 07:42:51 PM
ACKKKKKKKKKKKKKK IS PAULUS's FLY UNZIPPED!! :shock:

Why does he have a forensic scientist??


IT IS!!!!  In that top photo, Paulus' fly is unzipped!  GROOOSSS!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 08, 2007, 07:43:14 PM
The man who looks like or  is Paulus appears also to have a CAMERA in front of him.

 :shock:



Camera's not allowed in Casino's in US by customers...probably ok in Aruba though. :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Helen Back on December 08, 2007, 07:43:21 PM
(http://img129.imageshack.us/img129/8895/capta87b92480ed84807b7dgx3.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)
Paulus van der Sloot, forensic scientist Michael Archer, Anita van der Sloot and attorney Joseph Tacopina are seen early Friday, Dec. 7, 2007, before the release of Joran van der Sloot, in Oranjestad, Aruba. A judge in Aruba ordered the release Friday of the last of three suspects re-arrested last month in the disappearance of American teenager Natalee Holloway, ruling the evidence was not strong enough to continue holding him.
---------------------------------
(http://img510.imageshack.us/img510/4848/capt6aa55ae3cc974d8bb45jf5.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)
Anita van der Sloot, left, reacts as her attorney Rosemarie Arnold givers her the news of the release of her son Joran van der Sloot, Friday, Dec. 7, 2007, in Oranjestad, Aruba. A judge in Aruba ordered the release Friday of the last of three suspects re-arrested last month in the disappearance of American teenager Natalee Holloway, ruling the evidence was not strong enough to continue holding him

and what do you think a forensic scientist would be advising them on?  possible evidence that could be found on a body after being in the ocean for 3l mos? 
dennisintn

That was my question.  Very telling.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 08, 2007, 07:45:43 PM
The man who looks like or  is Paulus appears also to have a CAMERA in front of him.

 :shock:



Camera's not allowed in Casino's in US by customers...probably ok in Aruba though. :roll:


Well, he sure has one in that photo.  And we have long been looking for that photo connection.  There's one.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Observer on December 08, 2007, 07:46:28 PM
The man who looks like or  is Paulus appears also to have a CAMERA in front of him.

 :shock:



That could be a camera..I can't tell for sure though  :-|


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 08, 2007, 07:48:12 PM
The man who looks like or  is Paulus appears also to have a CAMERA in front of him.

 :shock:



That could be a camera..I can't tell for sure though  :-|

It's a silver box with a hole in the front.  Only thing I can think of that fits that description is a camera.  Maybe Paulus is the photog instead of Freddie.

Your own father!

Just a thought.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 08, 2007, 07:51:32 PM
ACKKKKKKKKKKKKKK IS PAULUS's FLY UNZIPPED!! :shock:

Why does he have a forensic scientist??


More than likely to discredit any evidence found. BUT....what bugs me is that I googled this man and the only thing I can find is a NEW WIKI posing of him and just stuff recently re: Natalee/Sloots. I just started looking....but it is weird he isn't in google other than that.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: private eye on December 08, 2007, 07:52:16 PM
If I recall...Bill Clinton has already shown interest in the case.
An FBI agent that was on Aruba talked to Clinton about seeing
a Green Bay Packers poster in Joran's room and Clinton talked
to Bret Favre about meeting with Joran to try to get him to confess.

Beth has turned to Condaleeza Rice and Jug said that Bush was
his man so possibably that side would be a better bet.

I am middle age, so I have gotten to watch a lot of Presidents give speeches on foreign relations, treaties, etc. and I always got the impression that they had aides and speech writers advise them and write their speeches. With Clinton, and the elder Bush, I always felt like they personally had a complete and full understanding of the complete world:) Bush from his education and many many years of public service from the CIA to his work in China, VP and President, and Clinton, mostly from his thirst for knowledge and gift from God, though 2 terms in the white house helped as did his other positions. That is why I think the 2 of them became such close friends the last few years. Nothing at all against the other Pres as Reagan and Kennedy were 2 of my all time favorites as well.

Probably a waste of time to even think about it, and I repeat, I have nothing against the present Bush, I think we all owe him a thanks for despite possibly being wrong at different stages of the Iraq war, having the courage, brilliance, and persistence to correct the situation which he seems to be doing with the latest buildup. That took a strong man interested not in himself, but in bettering the world.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Leslie on December 08, 2007, 07:56:29 PM
Paul has never been asked, in any public interview, to confirm or deny his presence in the casino beside Natalee.  The video was first viewed as part of the ABC/Chris Cuomo interview with Joran in February 2006.  Cuomo didn't mention that the man was Paul; that was discovered by posters in this forum (myself included).  The man has the same height, weight, posture, clothing, glasses, hairline and gold watch as Paul.  Klaas did many photo comparisons that proved the man was Paul.  Of course, Joran says that his father left the casino prior to his interaction with Natalee and her friends, but his dubious timeline is untruthful.  This is one of the best pieces of evidence to prove that Joran has lied in his police statements and to Greta's face but when has the truth been important in this case?
Why was Joran lying about an interaction between Natalee and his father (when both VDS men admit Paul was at the casino that evening) prior to the last public appearance of Natalee at C&C's?  It seems innocent enough so why not own up to it?  The silence on Paul's part is extremely suspicious. 
 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: private eye on December 08, 2007, 07:56:56 PM
There is someone who can figure this thing out, and I am praying that whoever he is, somehow, Beth meets him. And no knock against JQK, at all, he is Beth's rock.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 08, 2007, 07:59:24 PM
http://www.ledger-enquirer.com/252/story/194833.html

Photo by Michael Archer


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: private eye on December 08, 2007, 07:59:32 PM
I think I may better sign off. Getting a visual of Natalee being sexually assualted by Paulus is enough to cause me to ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, even though I believe it is a real possibility


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 08, 2007, 08:00:58 PM
The man who looks like or  is Paulus appears also to have a CAMERA in front of him.

 :shock:



That could be a camera..I can't tell for sure though  :-|

It's a silver box with a hole in the front.  Only thing I can think of that fits that description is a camera.  Maybe Paulus is the photog instead of Freddie.

Your own father!

Just a thought.

.

I can't tell if it is a camera either...I think I am going to puke


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: private eye on December 08, 2007, 08:01:22 PM
Was that the Captain of the high tech ship who posted last night?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 08, 2007, 08:06:35 PM
That is Paulus in the casino with Natalee...want to know how I know?

IF IT WASN'T PAULUS WE WOULD ALREADY KNOW WHO IT IS!

 Joe T. would have pulled that guy out of whatever cave he has been hiding in and pranced him out in front of the cameras just to prove that Paulus had nothing to do with this. Attorneys will leak any info that is beneficial to their clients. Proving that is not Paulus would be a big, big positive for the Sloots.  IT IS PAULUS!!!!  If it isn't then someone needs to prove it to me....I am waiting.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Observer on December 08, 2007, 08:06:56 PM
The man who looks like or  is Paulus appears also to have a CAMERA in front of him.

 :shock:



Camera's not allowed in Casino's in US by customers...probably ok in Aruba though. :roll:


Well, he sure has one in that photo.  And we have long been looking for that photo connection.  There's one.

.

Taking pictures of the MB girls so they can pick out one that they like? No idea why PVDS would have a camera in the casino or why he would be using a camera at all that night.

It seems to me like Joran was communicating with the guy. Then the girl points at the  man and Joran quickly turns his attention to her.(Jorans Body Language) Like why are you pointing and drawing attention to him? Sure would be nice to see the entire footage.
(http://img402.imageshack.us/img402/8677/casino3op4.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)
(http://img212.imageshack.us/img212/6048/casino6qx7.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Buckeye on December 08, 2007, 08:08:39 PM
Maybe he's in "computer forensics"  :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: private eye on December 08, 2007, 08:09:37 PM
I was teasing about not being able to deal with Paulus involvement, sort of. I have always thought he had some undefined inappropriate relationship with Joran involving sex, women, possibly others, drinking, that started out probably as a father wanting to be friends with his kid, then digressing slowly, and culminating in this incident. His behavior with Beth was inappropriate if he was lying for his son. It wouldn't be that terrifying for a Father to lie to protect his son, most fathers could do that without feeling overwhelmed with guilt and stress. It is different to cover up your own wrong deeds, and guilt is a more appropriate reaction.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 08, 2007, 08:11:11 PM
The man who looks like or  is Paulus appears also to have a CAMERA in front of him.

 :shock:



That could be a camera..I can't tell for sure though  :-|

I may be way off here...but I think that is a pack of cigarettes in front of Paulus. IIRC in the video...the complete one that we saw in the news story, he lights one up.  Of course, I could be wrong.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 08, 2007, 08:12:16 PM
Those four in the photo look like the Weight Watcher's "BEFORE" photo.  Never knew Joe T was so pudgy.  Even Anita has been porking up.  Koen is not the only one to have packed on the poundage.

Don't think too much of Anita's orange hair, either.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: private eye on December 08, 2007, 08:13:17 PM
The man who looks like or  is Paulus appears also to have a CAMERA in front of him.

 :shock:



Cigarettes would be the normal item to expect him to set in front of him

That could be a camera..I can't tell for sure though  :-|

I may be way off here...but I think that is a pack of cigarettes in front of Paulus. IIRC in the video...the complete one that we saw in the news story, he lights one up.  Of course, I could be wrong.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 08, 2007, 08:15:30 PM
On second thought, I think he reaches into his pocket to get the cigs. So I guess, it is a camera.  I would have to see that video again to be sure.  Do we have the entire ABC version anywhere?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 08, 2007, 08:15:54 PM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/CasinoPVDS.jpg)

White shirt/tan pants

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/pvdscar1.jpg)

White shirt/white pants

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/pvds8.jpg)


It may not be a camera, I could be wrong.  But it looks like a camera to the right of the cigarettes and like it has a thick black camera strap attached to it.

If not a camera, I wonder what it could be.  Wish Klaas would get back as she is very good at this kind of thing.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 08, 2007, 08:16:06 PM
Was that the Captain of the high tech ship who posted last night?

that was Kyle Kingman...you can read about him here
http://nholloway.blogspot.com/

He is not the ships Captain. He isn't on the boat yet...he will fly in to Aruba and go to the boat from there.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: AZSunny on December 08, 2007, 08:17:17 PM
(http://img129.imageshack.us/img129/8895/capta87b92480ed84807b7dgx3.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)
Paulus van der Sloot, forensic scientist Michael Archer, Anita van der Sloot and attorney Joseph Tacopina are seen early Friday, Dec. 7, 2007, before the release of Joran van der Sloot, in Oranjestad, Aruba. A judge in Aruba ordered the release Friday of the last of three suspects re-arrested last month in the disappearance of American teenager Natalee Holloway, ruling the evidence was not strong enough to continue holding him.
---------------------------------
(http://img510.imageshack.us/img510/4848/capt6aa55ae3cc974d8bb45jf5.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)
Anita van der Sloot, left, reacts as her attorney Rosemarie Arnold givers her the news of the release of her son Joran van der Sloot, Friday, Dec. 7, 2007, in Oranjestad, Aruba. A judge in Aruba ordered the release Friday of the last of three suspects re-arrested last month in the disappearance of American teenager Natalee Holloway, ruling the evidence was not strong enough to continue holding him

Interesting picture.  It looks like Paul forgot to zip his pants, and Taco has man boobs. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 08, 2007, 08:17:20 PM
Was that the Captain of the high tech ship who posted last night?

that was Kyle Kingman...you can read about him here
http://nholloway.blogspot.com/

He is not the ships Captain. He isn't on the boat yet...he will fly in to Aruba and go to the boat from there.


well.I screwed up that post ugh...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Observer on December 08, 2007, 08:18:53 PM
Michael Archer is the lead forensic scientist on the Joran van der Sloot defense team. In December 2007 Archer travelled to Aruba with van der Sloot's American defense attornies Joseph Tacopina & Rosemarie Arnold. In the weeks leading up to this trip Arubian prosecutor Hans Mos led Joran's defense team to believe there was "incriminating new evidence" against Joran. This was found to be untrue. While in Aruba, Archer examined the points of interest in the case and was set to meet with the Arubian authorities shortly before Joran was released from the KIA detention center. Archer said, "It was obvious that there was no new evidence. In fact, there is no evidence that Natalie died as a result of a criminal act. There is no crime scene, there is no DNA or forensic evidence, there are no confessions and there is no body. In the time Joran was with Natalie it would be impossible for him to have killed her and disposed of her without leaving a trace. I am certain Joran did not kill Natalie Holloway."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Archer


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 08, 2007, 08:18:57 PM
Was that the Captain of the high tech ship who posted last night?

that was Kyle Kingman...you can read about him here
http://nholloway.blogspot.com/

He is not the ships Captain. He isn't on the boat yet...he will fly in to Aruba and go to the boat from there.


well.I screwed up that post ugh...

I think he might be the geophysicist who operates the equipment maybe?  He told us but I am too dumb to understand well.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 08, 2007, 08:19:22 PM
On second thought, I think he reaches into his pocket to get the cigs. So I guess, it is a camera.  I would have to see that video again to be sure.  Do we have the entire ABC version anywhere?


Is Paulus a smoker?


Title: It's time to take the gloves off!
Post by: Leslie on December 08, 2007, 08:19:54 PM
Nice picture of Paul with his fly down and sweat covering the upper right side of his shirt.  Is that his wedding ring on his right hand?
Anita must have asked for the Harpo Marx look at the beauty salon. Ugh.
 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: AZSunny on December 08, 2007, 08:22:46 PM
whoops, guess you had already noticed the fly and man boobs. I should have read further before posting.  What a gross looking group though.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: pdh3 on December 08, 2007, 08:23:01 PM
I have always thought that Paulus was more directly involved..... More than just with the with cover-up and aftermath of Joran's actions. And I have always believed that Natalee was taken to the VDS home first.
That statement...."Your own father"  is very telling, along with Joran's contention that nothing would have happened if Anita had not been out off the island. I had the feeling he meant that both he and Paulus would have been held in check by Anita's presence.
Doesn't Paulus have a reputation as a ladies man on the island...as sickening and unbelievable as that may sound?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 08, 2007, 08:28:30 PM
Nice picture of Paul with his fly down and sweat covering the upper right side of his shirt.  Is that his wedding ring on his right hand?
Anita must have asked for the Harpo Marx look at the beauty salon. Ugh.
 


Well she should be very pleased for she sure got it!    :D



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 08, 2007, 08:29:48 PM
Who is paying for Michael Archer???

 :shock:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: mrs. red on December 08, 2007, 08:30:14 PM
Where's Robots?   Joe T. has man boobs!

take a look at the body language in that picture.....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Scandi on December 08, 2007, 08:33:27 PM
Hi Everyone,  The one hope I have now after the disappointment of Joran being released is that hopefully they will now find Natalee.  The ship should be in place, right?  Has there been any word about what is happening with the search?  Thanks  ;}

Scandi, the ship is experiencing weather delay...stuck in 14-18 foot seas.
They do not expect to arrive until Wednesday.

Thanks Magnolia,  I wonder if they are going straight down through all those islands south of Florida?  I'll have to watch the weather tonight.  I just hope they have a specific target area, and I would think they would have to to go to all this work and expense.  Exciting!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: mrs. red on December 08, 2007, 08:33:36 PM
Michael Archer is the lead forensic scientist on the Joran van der Sloot defense team. In December 2007 Archer travelled to Aruba with van der Sloot's American defense attornies Joseph Tacopina & Rosemarie Arnold. In the weeks leading up to this trip Arubian prosecutor Hans Mos led Joran's defense team to believe there was "incriminating new evidence" against Joran. This was found to be untrue. While in Aruba, Archer examined the points of interest in the case and was set to meet with the Arubian authorities shortly before Joran was released from the KIA detention center. Archer said, "It was obvious that there was no new evidence. In fact, there is no evidence that Natalie died as a result of a criminal act. There is no crime scene, there is no DNA or forensic evidence, there are no confessions and there is no body. In the time Joran was with Natalie it would be impossible for him to have killed her and disposed of her without leaving a trace. I am certain Joran did not kill Natalie Holloway."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Archer



what a assbite.... !!!!!  I mean flipping A... I should call myself a forensic scientist by spouting off some stupid BS!  GRRR>... what exactly are his creditials?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 08, 2007, 08:33:47 PM
Where's Robots?   Joe T. has man boobs!

take a look at the body language in that picture.....


Big Bellies-R-Us?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 08, 2007, 08:34:45 PM
Who is paying for Michael Archer???

 :shock:
CHECK this out>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Archer
I posted something similar to this earlier...Don't you all find it ODD that that is all it says for this so called Forensic Scientist??? I googled this man and the only thing I found was the NEW WIKI posting of him and just stuff recently re: Natalee/Sloots that is in the news. Show me other stuff this guy has worked on or been involved in...I can't find it. Seems fishy to me.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 08, 2007, 08:36:15 PM
Michael Archer is the lead forensic scientist on the Joran van der Sloot defense team. In December 2007 Archer travelled to Aruba with van der Sloot's American defense attornies Joseph Tacopina & Rosemarie Arnold. In the weeks leading up to this trip Arubian prosecutor Hans Mos led Joran's defense team to believe there was "incriminating new evidence" against Joran. This was found to be untrue. While in Aruba, Archer examined the points of interest in the case and was set to meet with the Arubian authorities shortly before Joran was released from the KIA detention center. Archer said, "It was obvious that there was no new evidence. In fact, there is no evidence that Natalie died as a result of a criminal act. There is no crime scene, there is no DNA or forensic evidence, there are no confessions and there is no body. In the time Joran was with Natalie it would be impossible for him to have killed her and disposed of her without leaving a trace. I am certain Joran did not kill Natalie Holloway."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Archer



what a assbite.... !!!!!  I mean flipping A... I should call myself a forensic scientist by spouting off some stupid BS!  GRRR>... what exactly are his creditials?


ACKKKKKK......I have been bitching about that for 3 pages now......arggggggg :gaah:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Observer on December 08, 2007, 08:36:37 PM
Who is paying for Michael Archer???

 :shock:

Probably the same people that payed for the famous PI out of Chicago,Tacopinas Law Firm out of NYC,The Law Firm out of Chicago and every other high dollar american expert representing the Van Der Sloots or Kalpoes.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: wreck on December 08, 2007, 08:36:50 PM
Where's Robots?   Joe T. has man boobs!

take a look at the body language in that picture.....
looks like a preview for the the new TV show "Aruban Fat Club" or "Aruba's Biggest Losers"  :silent:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Frank on December 08, 2007, 08:37:00 PM
Can I suggest we change this thread from Natalee to Paulus and focus our attention on him and him alone?

In fact, have we really researched this guy completely? I have to believe there are likely to be some ADULTS who find him a disgrace.

Didn't someone post and article where he was lectured by another lawyer?

Can we get a hold of this lawyer?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Buckeye on December 08, 2007, 08:38:27 PM
Michael Archer is the lead forensic scientist on the Joran van der Sloot defense team. In December 2007 Archer travelled to Aruba with van der Sloot's American defense attornies Joseph Tacopina & Rosemarie Arnold. In the weeks leading up to this trip Arubian prosecutor Hans Mos led Joran's defense team to believe there was "incriminating new evidence" against Joran. This was found to be untrue. While in Aruba, Archer examined the points of interest in the case and was set to meet with the Arubian authorities shortly before Joran was released from the KIA detention center. Archer said, "It was obvious that there was no new evidence. In fact, there is no evidence that Natalie died as a result of a criminal act. There is no crime scene, there is no DNA or forensic evidence, there are no confessions and there is no body. In the time Joran was with Natalie it would be impossible for him to have killed her and disposed of her without leaving a trace. I am certain Joran did not kill Natalie Holloway."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Archer

Julia probably wrote that wiki article.  I don't believe that guy is forensic anything.  He would have been published somewhere and I can't find a thing.  His comments, if real would have addressed something technical.  He looks like bodyguard/muscle, to me.  Taco doesn't want his new face messed up.  He's afraid in aruba too.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: mrs. red on December 08, 2007, 08:38:47 PM
Where's Robots?   Joe T. has man boobs!

take a look at the body language in that picture.....


Big Bellies-R-Us?

well that too.... but there was something else that stood out to me right away... Look at how they are all standing..


and ANNA and Tyler, Red said he would be sooooo disappointed if the two of you didn't post on the FP about today's article... :wink: :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Helen Back on December 08, 2007, 08:38:56 PM
    Electronic Games Research Guide         Provided by
Dictionaries and Research Guides    
Search:
   
   Michael Archer    
Michael Archer
Michael E. Archer is a forensic scientist from New York City. He is a member of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences. He is the chief forensic examiner at New York Forensics, Inc., in Fishkill, New York. Additionally, he is an Investigator in the Dutchess County Medical Examiner's Office. Archer has taught at Marist College in Poughkeepsie, New York & at Mount Saint Mary's College in Newburgh, New York, worked on high profile cases with Henry C. Lee, Ph.D. & Michael Baden, M.D. and appeared on Court T.V. and has been in the New York Times, The Daily News & The New York Post.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 08, 2007, 08:39:00 PM
If I recall...Bill Clinton has already shown interest in the case.
An FBI agent that was on Aruba talked to Clinton about seeing
a Green Bay Packers poster in Joran's room and Clinton talked
to Bret Favre about meeting with Joran to try to get him to confess.

Beth has turned to Condaleeza Rice and Jug said that Bush was
his man so possibably that side would be a better bet.

Joran once listed Bill Clinton as his favorite author on his website.  In fact, a lot of the PIMPS listed Clinton as one of their favorite people at one time.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Buckeye on December 08, 2007, 08:39:45 PM
Can I suggest we change this thread from Natalee to Paulus and focus our attention on him and him alone?

In fact, have we really researched this guy completely? I have to believe there are likely to be some ADULTS who find him a disgrace.

Didn't someone post and article where he was lectured by another lawyer?

Can we get a hold of this lawyer?

I believe he was lectured by Nico Jorg, in front of the lawyers.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: mrs. red on December 08, 2007, 08:40:03 PM
Michael Archer is the lead forensic scientist on the Joran van der Sloot defense team. In December 2007 Archer travelled to Aruba with van der Sloot's American defense attornies Joseph Tacopina & Rosemarie Arnold. In the weeks leading up to this trip Arubian prosecutor Hans Mos led Joran's defense team to believe there was "incriminating new evidence" against Joran. This was found to be untrue. While in Aruba, Archer examined the points of interest in the case and was set to meet with the Arubian authorities shortly before Joran was released from the KIA detention center. Archer said, "It was obvious that there was no new evidence. In fact, there is no evidence that Natalie died as a result of a criminal act. There is no crime scene, there is no DNA or forensic evidence, there are no confessions and there is no body. In the time Joran was with Natalie it would be impossible for him to have killed her and disposed of her without leaving a trace. I am certain Joran did not kill Natalie Holloway."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Archer

Julia probably wrote that wiki article.  I don't believe that guy is forensic anything.  He would have been published somewhere and I can't find a thing.  His comments, if real would have addressed something technical.  He looks like bodyguard/muscle, to me.  Taco doesn't want his new face messed up.  He's afraid in aruba too.

that's the body language I am talking about...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Observer on December 08, 2007, 08:40:20 PM
   Electronic Games Research Guide         Provided by
Dictionaries and Research Guides    
Search:
   
   Michael Archer    
Michael Archer
Michael E. Archer is a forensic scientist from New York City. He is a member of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences. He is the chief forensic examiner at New York Forensics, Inc., in Fishkill, New York. Additionally, he is an Investigator in the Dutchess County Medical Examiner's Office. Archer has taught at Marist College in Poughkeepsie, New York & at Mount Saint Mary's College in Newburgh, New York, worked on high profile cases with Henry C. Lee, Ph.D. & Michael Baden, M.D. and appeared on Court T.V. and has been in the New York Times, The Daily News & The New York Post.


These people have permits to work in Aruba?  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Buckeye on December 08, 2007, 08:41:15 PM
   Electronic Games Research Guide         Provided by
Dictionaries and Research Guides    
Search:
   
   Michael Archer    
Michael Archer
Michael E. Archer is a forensic scientist from New York City. He is a member of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences. He is the chief forensic examiner at New York Forensics, Inc., in Fishkill, New York. Additionally, he is an Investigator in the Dutchess County Medical Examiner's Office. Archer has taught at Marist College in Poughkeepsie, New York & at Mount Saint Mary's College in Newburgh, New York, worked on high profile cases with Henry C. Lee, Ph.D. & Michael Baden, M.D. and appeared on Court T.V. and has been in the New York Times, The Daily News & The New York Post.


You're good.  I didn't find anything.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: private eye on December 08, 2007, 08:41:35 PM
This is a dumb question, but, who has access to what information has been collected specific to Natalee's disappearance, what information has been determined to be admissable in court, and what evidence has actually been submitted to the court? As I understand it, Beth and her attorneys are not allowed to review this material, until Aruba has formally made a decision not to proesecute and cannot prosecute?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: mrs. red on December 08, 2007, 08:41:40 PM
   Electronic Games Research Guide         Provided by
Dictionaries and Research Guides    
Search:
   
   Michael Archer    
Michael Archer
Michael E. Archer is a forensic scientist from New York City. He is a member of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences. He is the chief forensic examiner at New York Forensics, Inc., in Fishkill, New York. Additionally, he is an Investigator in the Dutchess County Medical Examiner's Office. Archer has taught at Marist College in Poughkeepsie, New York & at Mount Saint Mary's College in Newburgh, New York, worked on high profile cases with Henry C. Lee, Ph.D. & Michael Baden, M.D. and appeared on Court T.V. and has been in the New York Times, The Daily News & The New York Post.


Interesting how in this case his findings are completely opposite or what Baden's thoughts are....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Scandi on December 08, 2007, 08:42:48 PM
Was that the Captain of the high tech ship who posted last night?

that was Kyle Kingman...you can read about him here
http://nholloway.blogspot.com/

He is not the ships Captain. He isn't on the boat yet...he will fly in to Aruba and go to the boat from there.


well.I screwed up that post ugh...

Thanks PrivateEye for that link which is fantabulous!  To think they even did a pretest of the equip offshore before they left for Aruba is really something.  A 1700 mile trip.  Oh, I do pray for their success looking for her.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: private eye on December 08, 2007, 08:49:26 PM
If I recall...Bill Clinton has already shown interest in the case.
An FBI agent that was on Aruba talked to Clinton about seeing
a Green Bay Packers poster in Joran's room and Clinton talked
to Bret Favre about meeting with Joran to try to get him to confess.

Beth has turned to Condaleeza Rice and Jug said that Bush was
his man so possibably that side would be a better bet.

Joran once listed Bill Clinton as his favorite author on his website.  In fact, a lot of the PIMPS listed Clinton as one of their favorite people at one time.


Well he certainly couldn't object, and probably would support Clinton's involvement:) I am not talking morals, although Bush a confirmed cocaine user and heavy drinker, Kennedy, a reported injector of speed and womanizer of a scale as to make Clinton a rookie, would all flunk the moral test. I just think him and the elder Bush have a better than normal understanding of things than the average president:) Hey, a Democrat and a Republican I am equal opportunity




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 08, 2007, 08:50:20 PM
   Electronic Games Research Guide         Provided by
Dictionaries and Research Guides    
Search:
   
   Michael Archer    
Michael Archer
Michael E. Archer is a forensic scientist from New York City. He is a member of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences. He is the chief forensic examiner at New York Forensics, Inc., in Fishkill, New York. Additionally, he is an Investigator in the Dutchess County Medical Examiner's Office. Archer has taught at Marist College in Poughkeepsie, New York & at Mount Saint Mary's College in Newburgh, New York, worked on high profile cases with Henry C. Lee, Ph.D. & Michael Baden, M.D. and appeared on Court T.V. and has been in the New York Times, The Daily News & The New York Post.



o


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: private eye on December 08, 2007, 08:50:46 PM
Was that the Captain of the high tech ship who posted last night?

that was Kyle Kingman...you can read about him here
http://nholloway.blogspot.com/

He is not the ships Captain. He isn't on the boat yet...he will fly in to Aruba and go to the boat from there.


well.I screwed up that post ugh...

Thanks PrivateEye for that link which is fantabulous!  To think they even did a pretest of the equip offshore before they left for Aruba is really something.  A 1700 mile trip.  Oh, I do pray for their success looking for her.

Thanks goes elsewhere, my only contribution was to mess up the quote:))))))


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 08, 2007, 08:51:19 PM
Quote from: KarmaRoundUp on Today at 06:11:40 PM
Art Wood
'Rita Cosby Live & Direct'
December 1, 2005

ART WOOD, FORMER SECRET SERVICE AGENT: Absolutely. Absolutely. There's a lot that Americans can do through the State Department. I want to remind everybody that Natalee Holloway was a U.S. citizen. Once the Aruban authorities are done investigating this case, the FBI can still conduct an investigation.

I would like to know,once and for all,IF this is true.
Hi Monkeys

Klaas:
I would like to know too.  I'm affraid if we ask 3 different people we'll get 3 different answers.
 :gaah:
Got stuck on the last thread.I hear you Klaas.
 :smt102


Art Wood
DANA PRETZER
July 2, 2006 - Part 1
July 8, 2006 - Part 2

http://sundaynightsatellite.libsyn.com/index.php?post_year=2006&post_month=07

Art:

The family of Natalee needs to put pressure on the US attorney in Birmingham to push the FBI to conduct an investigation after ALE close the case. We have a treaty that allows the FBI to pursue a violation of civil rights of an american citizen there.
Thanks Janet.

Karma ... I have save a copy of the treaty and related provision reference somewhere in a file on my disorganized desktop files.   :)

I am off now but ... will attempt to find it tomorrow afternoon and ... post accordingly

Have nice evening Monkeys.

Janet

4:20 PM

Karma ... I found it!

Janet

+++++++++++++


“IT AIN’T OVER UNTIL IT IS OVER.”

Art Wood
'Rita Cosby Live & Direct'
December 2, 2005


ART WOOD, FORMER SECRET SERVICE AGENT: Absolutely. Absolutely. There's a lot that Americans can do through the State Department. I want to remind everybody that Natalee Holloway was a U.S. citizen. Once the Aruban authorities are done investigating this case, the FBI can still conduct an investigation, and they could extradite these suspects to the United States. Let me point out that there's a ton of circumstantial evidence in this case to convict these kids.


http://www.internationalextradition.com/netherlands_bi.htm
When the FBI Seeks Extradition
BILATERAL EXTRADITION TREATIES
NETHERLANDS


<snipped>

SCHEDULE OF OFFENSES

1. Murder; assault with intent to commit murder.

2. Manslaughter.

3. Malicious wounding; inflicting grievous bodily harm.

4. Arson.

5. Rape; indecent assault; incest; bigamy.

6. Unlawful sexual acts with or upon children under the age specified by the laws of both the Requesting and Requested States.

7. Wilful abandonment of a minor or other dependent person when the life of that minor or that dependent person is or is likely to be injured or endangered.

8. Kidnapping; abduction; false imprisonment.

9. Robbery; burglary; larceny; embezzlement.

10. Fraud, including obtaining property, money or valuable securities by false pretenses, deceit, falsehood, or other fraudulent means.

11. Bribery, including soliciting, offering [*27] and accepting.

12. Extortion.

13. Receiving, possessing or transporting anything of value knowing it to have been unlawfully obtained.

14. Offenses relating to criminal breach of trust.

15. An offense against the laws relating to counterfeiting and forgery; including the forging of seals, trademarks, documents, or use of such forgeries.

16. An offense against the laws relating to international transfers of funds.

17. An offense against the laws relating to importation, exportation or transit of goods, articles, or merchandise, including violations of the customs laws.

18. Offenses relating to slavery or the illegal transporting of persons.

19. Offenses against the laws relating to bankruptcy.

20. Offenses against the laws relating to prohibition of private monopoly or unfair trade practices.

21. Perjury; subornation of perjury; making a false statement to a government agency or official.

22. Offenses relating to wilful evasion of taxes and duties.

23. Any act or omission intended or likely to: (a) endanger the safety of an aircraft in flight or of any person on board such aircraft; or (b) destroy or render any aircraft incapable of flight.

24. Any unlawful seizure or exercise of control [*28] of an aircraft in flight by force or violence, or by threat of force or violence, or by any other form of intimidation.

25. Any unlawful act or omission intended or that is likely to endanger the safety of any person in a railway train or in any vessel or other means of transportation.

26. Piracy, mutiny, or any mutinous act committed on board a vessel.

27. Malicious damage to property.

28. Offenses against the laws relating to the traffic in, or the possession, production or manufacture of narcotic drugs, cannabis, psychotropic drugs, cocaine and its derivatives, and other dangerous drugs and chemicals.

29. Offenses against laws relating to the poisonous chemicals or substances injurious to health.

30. Offenses against the laws relating to firearms, ammunition, explosives, incendiary devices or nuclear materials.

31. Offenses against the laws relating to the abuse of official authority.

32. Offenses against the laws relating to obstruction of justice.

33. Offenses relating to securities and commodities.

34. Facilitating or permitting the escape of a person from custody.

35. Incitements to violence.

36. Any other act for which extradition may be granted in accordance with the laws [*29] of both Contracting Parties.

_______


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 08, 2007, 08:51:57 PM
   Electronic Games Research Guide         Provided by
Dictionaries and Research Guides    
Search:
   
   Michael Archer    
Michael Archer
Michael E. Archer is a forensic scientist from New York City. He is a member of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences. He is the chief forensic examiner at New York Forensics, Inc., in Fishkill, New York. Additionally, he is an Investigator in the Dutchess County Medical Examiner's Office. Archer has taught at Marist College in Poughkeepsie, New York & at Mount Saint Mary's College in Newburgh, New York, worked on high profile cases with Henry C. Lee, Ph.D. & Michael Baden, M.D. and appeared on Court T.V. and has been in the New York Times, The Daily News & The New York Post.


You're good.  I didn't find anything.

me either... :2thinky:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: oceanexploration on December 08, 2007, 08:54:12 PM
Scandi,

To set the record straight, I am the geophysical engineer on board the Persistence and author of the blog you referenced.  The sea trials of the equipment are described in detail in a post on the blog.  The most direct route is approx 1700 miles, but it is safer to loosely follow the coast.  This makes the trip significantly longer, yet safer.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Blue Moon on December 08, 2007, 08:54:15 PM
The man who looks like or  is Paulus appears also to have a CAMERA in front of him.

 :shock:



That could be a camera..I can't tell for sure though  :-|

It's a silver box with a hole in the front.  Only thing I can think of that fits that description is a camera.  Maybe Paulus is the photog instead of Freddie.

Your own father!

Just a thought.

.

Looks like a cell phone to me.  Mine looks that way also.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 08, 2007, 08:54:26 PM
LOL PI ........I am the one who screwed it up, lol...while trying to answer your question about the boat Captain.....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: San on December 08, 2007, 08:54:39 PM
(http://img129.imageshack.us/img129/8895/capta87b92480ed84807b7dgx3.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)
Paulus van der Sloot, forensic scientist Michael Archer, Anita van der Sloot and attorney Joseph Tacopina are seen early Friday, Dec. 7, 2007, before the release of Joran van der Sloot, in Oranjestad, Aruba. A judge in Aruba ordered the release Friday of the last of three suspects re-arrested last month in the disappearance of American teenager Natalee Holloway, ruling the evidence was not strong enough to continue holding him.
---------------------------------
(http://img510.imageshack.us/img510/4848/capt6aa55ae3cc974d8bb45jf5.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)
Anita van der Sloot, left, reacts as her attorney Rosemarie Arnold givers her the news of the release of her son Joran van der Sloot, Friday, Dec. 7, 2007, in Oranjestad, Aruba. A judge in Aruba ordered the release Friday of the last of three suspects re-arrested last month in the disappearance of American teenager Natalee Holloway, ruling the evidence was not strong enough to continue holding him

Interesting picture.  It looks like Paul forgot to zip his pants, and Taco has man boobs. 

 :lol: :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Buckeye on December 08, 2007, 08:58:54 PM
   Electronic Games Research Guide         Provided by
Dictionaries and Research Guides    
Search:
   
   Michael Archer    
Michael Archer
Michael E. Archer is a forensic scientist from New York City. He is a member of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences. He is the chief forensic examiner at New York Forensics, Inc., in Fishkill, New York. Additionally, he is an Investigator in the Dutchess County Medical Examiner's Office. Archer has taught at Marist College in Poughkeepsie, New York & at Mount Saint Mary's College in Newburgh, New York, worked on high profile cases with Henry C. Lee, Ph.D. & Michael Baden, M.D. and appeared on Court T.V. and has been in the New York Times, The Daily News & The New York Post.


Interesting how in this case his findings are completely opposite or what Baden's thoughts are....

Was this from Wiki, too??  The only thing in Fishkill NY, I find is an Expert Witness Co.
If he's been quoted in NY Times etc, I would think there'd be a hit.  My son was quoted in a college newspaper and it comes up.   :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Silverfox on December 08, 2007, 09:01:54 PM
(http://img129.imageshack.us/img129/8895/capta87b92480ed84807b7dgx3.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)
Paulus van der Sloot, forensic scientist Michael Archer, Anita van der Sloot and attorney Joseph Tacopina are seen early Friday, Dec. 7, 2007, before the release of Joran van der Sloot, in Oranjestad, Aruba. A judge in Aruba ordered the release Friday of the last of three suspects re-arrested last month in the disappearance of American teenager Natalee Holloway, ruling the evidence was not strong enough to continue holding him.
---------------------------------
(http://img510.imageshack.us/img510/4848/capt6aa55ae3cc974d8bb45jf5.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)
Anita van der Sloot, left, reacts as her attorney Rosemarie Arnold givers her the news of the release of her son Joran van der Sloot, Friday, Dec. 7, 2007, in Oranjestad, Aruba. A judge in Aruba ordered the release Friday of the last of three suspects re-arrested last month in the disappearance of American teenager Natalee Holloway, ruling the evidence was not strong enough to continue holding him

I can't help it ! LOL....

Notice he can't even keep his short pants zipped up?  Must be a sign, right?  Trolling for ?

Hey, Paulus has a unique taste in clothes -- anyone notice?  His short sleeved shirts are "elbow length"... Look at other men in the pics and Paulus is the only one who seems to like that.  Very unusual for a guy who sweats so much...

I have long felt that there was a strong possibiity that J2K were on a "fishing" expedition with Paulus.  The casino pics could suggest that perhaps he "chose" nat and then later the boys "picked her Up" -- remember Deepak's tapped statement to Joran in the police car?  "Your own father?"



Title: Re: It's time to take the gloves off!
Post by: San on December 08, 2007, 09:02:13 PM
Nice picture of Paul with his fly down and sweat covering the upper right side of his shirt.  Is that his wedding ring on his right hand?
Anita must have asked for the Harpo Marx look at the beauty salon. Ugh.
 

 :lol: :lol:

(http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d118/Sanddrops/Harpo.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: oceanexploration on December 08, 2007, 09:02:30 PM
It would have been awful if we went all the way to Aruba to find out the side scan sonar and ROV was incapable of the tasks we require.  The sea trials served to both get the gear working on board the Persistence and to prove their adequacy. If you think it would be interesting, I could post a sample of the sea trial data. The side scan sonar data is fantastic.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Helen Back on December 08, 2007, 09:03:09 PM
   Electronic Games Research Guide         Provided by
Dictionaries and Research Guides    
Search:
   
   Michael Archer    
Michael Archer
Michael E. Archer is a forensic scientist from New York City. He is a member of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences. He is the chief forensic examiner at New York Forensics, Inc., in Fishkill, New York. Additionally, he is an Investigator in the Dutchess County Medical Examiner's Office. Archer has taught at Marist College in Poughkeepsie, New York & at Mount Saint Mary's College in Newburgh, New York, worked on high profile cases with Henry C. Lee, Ph.D. & Michael Baden, M.D. and appeared on Court T.V. and has been in the New York Times, The Daily News & The New York Post.


Interesting how in this case his findings are completely opposite or what Baden's thoughts are....

Was this from Wiki, too??  The only thing in Fishkill NY, I find is an Expert Witness Co.
If he's been quoted in NY Times etc, I would think there'd be a hit.  My son was quoted in a college newspaper and it comes up.   :roll:

searching for Michael Archer, forensic science.  Cannot find, CV, published articles or research, past cases.  nada.  I'll keep looking.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 08, 2007, 09:04:25 PM
Well...RU is giving Beth a rest and are back to blaming the MB kids again  :roll:

Monkey Bunkey @ RU wrote:
I'm still holding fast from day one, one of her "friends" dropped the x in her drink on the last night as a prank or in spite. Nasty gurls vying for that spot on the cheerleader team and all. Then it all went wrong when she never returned and they had to keep it quiet.

Someone in MB knows what they did.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

UGHhhhhhhh
 :roll: Now if they all think that 3 young 'boys' who live on Aruba couldn't get rid of Natalee without a trace...how the hell do they think these girls did...what a bunch of losers. :roll:



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: wreck on December 08, 2007, 09:05:55 PM
   Electronic Games Research Guide         Provided by
Dictionaries and Research Guides    
Search:
   
   Michael Archer    
Michael Archer
Michael E. Archer is a forensic scientist from New York City. He is a member of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences. He is the chief forensic examiner at New York Forensics, Inc., in Fishkill, New York. Additionally, he is an Investigator in the Dutchess County Medical Examiner's Office. Archer has taught at Marist College in Poughkeepsie, New York & at Mount Saint Mary's College in Newburgh, New York, worked on high profile cases with Henry C. Lee, Ph.D. & Michael Baden, M.D. and appeared on Court T.V. and has been in the New York Times, The Daily News & The New York Post.


Interesting how in this case his findings are completely opposite or what Baden's thoughts are....

Was this from Wiki, too??  The only thing in Fishkill NY, I find is an Expert Witness Co.
If he's been quoted in NY Times etc, I would think there'd be a hit.  My son was quoted in a college newspaper and it comes up.   :roll:
It doesn't say for WHAT. Probably as a "perp" in an artcle for organized crime.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 08, 2007, 09:06:01 PM
It would have been awful if we went all the way to Aruba to find out the side scan sonar and ROV was incapable of the tasks we require.  The sea trials served to both get the gear working on board the Persistence and to prove their adequacy. If you think it would be interesting, I could post a sample of the sea trial data. The side scan sonar data is fantastic.

PLEASE DO!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: AZSunny on December 08, 2007, 09:08:59 PM
It would have been awful if we went all the way to Aruba to find out the side scan sonar and ROV was incapable of the tasks we require.  The sea trials served to both get the gear working on board the Persistence and to prove their adequacy. If you think it would be interesting, I could post a sample of the sea trial data. The side scan sonar data is fantastic.
Yes!  Please do!  Where is the ship now?  I read they would be arriving on Wednesday in Aruba. How have they weathered the storms?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Blue Moon on December 08, 2007, 09:13:36 PM
Notice from that article this clipped part:

Anita van der Sloot, left, reacts as her attorney Rosemarie Arnold givers her the news of the release of her son Joran van der Sloot, Friday, Dec. 7, 2007


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Observer on December 08, 2007, 09:13:56 PM
It would have been awful if we went all the way to Aruba to find out the side scan sonar and ROV was incapable of the tasks we require.  The sea trials served to both get the gear working on board the Persistence and to prove their adequacy. If you think it would be interesting, I could post a sample of the sea trial data. The side scan sonar data is fantastic.

I think it's all fascinating..Even more so because on this expedition you are looking for Natalee. I observed some of the pics and it's amazing how small the crab cage would look. I guess thats where the ROV will come into play and great to hear that it has been working perfect.

In recent years there have been other missing americans who have dissapeared without a trace under suspicious circumstances. They may have been also buried off the coast of Aruba. You search may have others worried in Aruba that are not involved in Natalee's dissapearance.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 08, 2007, 09:16:41 PM
Notice from that article this clipped part:

Anita van der Sloot, left, reacts as her attorney Rosemarie Arnold givers her the news of the release of her son Joran van der Sloot, Friday, Dec. 7, 2007

interesting.....nice catch.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: dennisintn on December 08, 2007, 09:16:45 PM
[
35. Incitements to violence.

36. Any other act for which extradition may be granted in accordance with the laws [*29] of both Contracting Parties.

_______
[/quote]

tm, i think that covers every crime possible except for "runs with scissors" and "playing with matches", but i'll bet there's an aruban law to keep the f.b.i. out or to have access to any of the files, even as incomplete as they are.
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: San on December 08, 2007, 09:18:00 PM
Notice from that article this clipped part:

Anita van der Sloot, left, reacts as her attorney Rosemarie Arnold givers her the news of the release of her son Joran van der Sloot, Friday, Dec. 7, 2007

They meant to say her husbands attorney. :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: oceanexploration on December 08, 2007, 09:18:00 PM
I don't know exactly where the boat is now.  Yesterday it was waiting on weather.  I'm hoping to fly out on wed or thurs.  I can probably get a couple screen shots of the sea trial data up tomorrow.  I'll post an example from good "industry standard" side scan sonar.. then with this system for comparison.  I mentioned it on the blog... its an EdgeTech 4200-FS if you want to google it.  EdgeTech has some sample images on their site. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Observer on December 08, 2007, 09:18:09 PM
Notice from that article this clipped part:

Anita van der Sloot, left, reacts as her attorney Rosemarie Arnold givers her the news of the release of her son Joran van der Sloot, Friday, Dec. 7, 2007

Yes Tacopina and his firm seem to be overseeing the Aruban Defense team..The whole thing stinks and is highly suspicious. PI'S out of Chicago,800 million dollar lawsuit by a firm out of chicago,Forensic Specialist,PI and Mob attorneys out of NYC..It's like a all star class of the full American Mob Defense Team.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Leslie on December 08, 2007, 09:20:59 PM
San: :lol:

I stole borrowed this:

TOP 20 WAYS TO TELL SOMEONE THEIR FLY IS UNZIPPED:

20) The cucumber has left the salad.
19) I can see the gun of Navarone.
18) Someone tore down the wall, and your Pink Floyd is hanging out.
17) You've got Windows on your laptop.
16) Sailor Ned's trying to take a little shore leave.
15) Your soldier isn't so unknown now.
14) Quasimodo needs to go back in the tower and tend to his bells.
13) You need to bring your tray table to the upright and locked position.
12) Paging Mr. Johnson... Paging Mr. Johnson...
11) Your pod bay door is open, Hal.
10) Elvis Junior has LEFT the building!
9) Mini Me is making a break for the escape pod.
8) Ensign Hanes is reporting a hull breach on the lower deck, Sir!
7) The Buick is not all the way in the garage.
6) Dr. Kimble has escaped!
5) You've got your fly set for "Monica" instead of "Hillary."
4) Our next guest is someone who needs no introduction...
3) You've got a security breach at Los Pantalones.
2) I'm talking about Shaft, can you dig it?

and The Number One Way to Tell Someone Their Fly Is Unzipped..

1) Men are From Mars, I Can See Your Penis.


 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 08, 2007, 09:25:23 PM
[
35. Incitements to violence.

36. Any other act for which extradition may be granted in accordance with the laws [*29] of both Contracting Parties.

_______

tm, i think that covers every crime possible except for "runs with scissors" and "playing with matches", but i'll bet there's an aruban law to keep the f.b.i. out or to have access to any of the files, even as incomplete as they are.
dennisintn
[/quote]

Yes but it also says that those to be extradited must have been charged and convicted previously.  And it is a voilation of the Dutch Constitution to extradite someone of Dutch nationality.

See:

Article 8 deals with the extradition of nationals. It contains two provisions similar to those included in some of our other recently signed extradition treaties. It grants the Executive Authority the discretionary power to extradite its own nationals. If extradition is denied on the basis of nationality, the requested Party undertakes to submit the case to its competent authorities for the purpose of prosecution, provided that Party has jurisdiction over the offense. This article thus takes into account the law of the Netherlands ordinarily prohibiting the extradition of Dutch nationals but allowing for their prosecution in the Netherlands for offenses committed abroad.  


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: San on December 08, 2007, 09:27:57 PM
Notice from that article this clipped part:

Anita van der Sloot, left, reacts as her attorney Rosemarie Arnold givers her the news of the release of her son Joran van der Sloot, Friday, Dec. 7, 2007

Yes Tacopina and his firm seem to be overseeing the Aruban Defense team..The whole thing stinks and is highly suspicious. PI'S out of Chicago,800 million dollar lawsuit by a firm out of chicago,Forensic Specialist,PI and Mob attorneys out of NYC..It's like a all star class of the full American Mob Defense Team.

I was speaking to someone tonight and telling them that a Mob figure is involved in Aruba and they said oh yeah what's his name.  I said Michael Posner without skipping a beat they said well he better stay in Aruba  :lol: 

Joe Tacopina made it a point of saying how he hated the mob and how he would never represent them in his GQ interview.  He is so FOS it is coming out of his ears.  He is your typical Brooklyn Italian who when growing up in a neighborhood that was infested with mob figures.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 08, 2007, 09:28:56 PM
   Electronic Games Research Guide         Provided by
Dictionaries and Research Guides    
Search:
   
   Michael Archer    
Michael Archer
Michael E. Archer is a forensic scientist from New York City. He is a member of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences. He is the chief forensic examiner at New York Forensics, Inc., in Fishkill, New York. Additionally, he is an Investigator in the Dutchess County Medical Examiner's Office. Archer has taught at Marist College in Poughkeepsie, New York & at Mount Saint Mary's College in Newburgh, New York, worked on high profile cases with Henry C. Lee, Ph.D. & Michael Baden, M.D. and appeared on Court T.V. and has been in the New York Times, The Daily News & The New York Post.


Interesting how in this case his findings are completely opposite or what Baden's thoughts are....

Was this from Wiki, too??  The only thing in Fishkill NY, I find is an Expert Witness Co.
If he's been quoted in NY Times etc, I would think there'd be a hit.  My son was quoted in a college newspaper and it comes up.   :roll:


I found the link for that>>>>
http://www.123exp-fun.com/t/01151501797/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: oceanexploration on December 08, 2007, 09:29:09 PM
I will not speculate on what we will find offshore Aruba.  Truth be told... noone knows.  That is the nature of ocean exploration.  I am excited by the fact that you will all be able to follow along with us during the search through the blog and the press.   


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Helen Back on December 08, 2007, 09:31:54 PM
   Electronic Games Research Guide         Provided by
Dictionaries and Research Guides    
Search:
   
   Michael Archer    
Michael Archer
Michael E. Archer is a forensic scientist from New York City. He is a member of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences. He is the chief forensic examiner at New York Forensics, Inc., in Fishkill, New York. Additionally, he is an Investigator in the Dutchess County Medical Examiner's Office. Archer has taught at Marist College in Poughkeepsie, New York & at Mount Saint Mary's College in Newburgh, New York, worked on high profile cases with Henry C. Lee, Ph.D. & Michael Baden, M.D. and appeared on Court T.V. and has been in the New York Times, The Daily News & The New York Post.


Interesting how in this case his findings are completely opposite or what Baden's thoughts are....

Was this from Wiki, too??  The only thing in Fishkill NY, I find is an Expert Witness Co.
If he's been quoted in NY Times etc, I would think there'd be a hit.  My son was quoted in a college newspaper and it comes up.   :roll:

while this contains some extra info, it came from a lame looking search result.  Related to electronic games?  or something?  http://www.123exp-fun.com/t/01151501797/

I am still looking for court tv. etc.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: San on December 08, 2007, 09:32:05 PM
San: :lol:

I stole borrowed this:

TOP 20 WAYS TO TELL SOMEONE THEIR FLY IS UNZIPPED:

20) The cucumber has left the salad.
19) I can see the gun of Navarone.
18) Someone tore down the wall, and your Pink Floyd is hanging out.
17) You've got Windows on your laptop.
16) Sailor Ned's trying to take a little shore leave.
15) Your soldier isn't so unknown now.
14) Quasimodo needs to go back in the tower and tend to his bells.
13) You need to bring your tray table to the upright and locked position.
12) Paging Mr. Johnson... Paging Mr. Johnson...
11) Your pod bay door is open, Hal.
10) Elvis Junior has LEFT the building!
9) Mini Me is making a break for the escape pod.
8) Ensign Hanes is reporting a hull breach on the lower deck, Sir!
7) The Buick is not all the way in the garage.
6) Dr. Kimble has escaped!
5) You've got your fly set for "Monica" instead of "Hillary."
4) Our next guest is someone who needs no introduction...
3) You've got a security breach at Los Pantalones.
2) I'm talking about Shaft, can you dig it?

and The Number One Way to Tell Someone Their Fly Is Unzipped..

1) Men are From Mars, I Can See Your Penis.

I can hear Letterman reading this list  :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Magnolia on December 08, 2007, 09:33:18 PM


Yes Tacopina and his firm seem to be overseeing the Aruban Defense team..The whole thing stinks and is highly suspicious. PI'S out of Chicago,800 million dollar lawsuit by a firm out of chicago,Forensic Specialist,PI and Mob attorneys out of NYC..It's like a all star class of the full American Mob Defense Team.
[/quote]

I was speaking to someone tonight and telling them that a Mob figure is involved in Aruba and they said oh yeah what's his name.  I said Michael Posner without skipping a beat they said well he better stay in Aruba  :lol: 

Joe Tacopina made it a point of saying how he hated the mob and how he would never represent them in his GQ interview.  He is so FOS it is coming out of his ears.  He is your typical Brooklyn Italian who when growing up in a neighborhood that was infested with mob figures.
[/quote]

And he no doubt idolized them.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 08, 2007, 09:34:14 PM
Well...RU is giving Beth a rest and are back to blaming the MB kids again  :roll:

Monkey Bunkey @ RU wrote:
I'm still holding fast from day one, one of her "friends" dropped the x in her drink on the last night as a prank or in spite. Nasty gurls vying for that spot on the cheerleader team and all. Then it all went wrong when she never returned and they had to keep it quiet.

Someone in MB knows what they did.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

UGHhhhhhhh
 :roll: Now if they all think that 3 young 'boys' who live on Aruba couldn't get rid of Natalee without a trace...how the hell do they think these girls did...what a bunch of losers. :roll:




Since Natalee was no longer in high school, I doubt her "cheerleading" position was a basis for MB girls drugging her.  What part of graduation do they not get?  Guess like Satish, these people never graduated from high school?  Do they really think she would be going back on weekends from college or something!

Talk about dumb as a box of rocks!  They can't even make up good lies.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: San on December 08, 2007, 09:35:32 PM
And he no doubt idolized them.

Exactly.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Observer on December 08, 2007, 09:40:01 PM
I will not speculate on what we will find offshore Aruba.  Truth be told... noone knows.  That is the nature of ocean exploration.  I am excited by the fact that you will all be able to follow along with us during the search through the blog and the press.   

Yes it sounds exciting. If Natalee is ever found this sounds like the best chance. That part of the Caribbean has become known as the Epicenter of cocaine distribution. So no telling what lies on that ocean floor between Aruba,Venezuela and Colombia. I pray Natalee is just a few miles offshore in the first place you guys search.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: robots on December 08, 2007, 09:40:35 PM
paulis is a killer


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 08, 2007, 09:41:57 PM
Notice now, as just announced on Fox News, that MOS is saying he will drop the CASE and not just the suspects by the end of the year.

So when did it go from suspects to case?  I noticed that is what a couple of the articles quoted him as saying.  Thought at first it was a misquote but this is about the third source saying that same thing.

Case and not just suspects.  I thought the investigation was going to continue but only those three stooges would not be officially considered as suspects.

Sounds as though he is going to close the entire thing down.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Helen Back on December 08, 2007, 09:41:58 PM
I will not speculate on what we will find offshore Aruba.  Truth be told... noone knows.  That is the nature of ocean exploration.  I am excited by the fact that you will all be able to follow along with us during the search through the blog and the press.   

Hi Ocenaexploration,

I am so thrilled at the prospect of your search, and so grateful for all the participants.  I'm sure most of us will be following your progress, as it sounds like a fascinating adventure, aside from the fact that we wish you great success in searching for Natalee.  The sample images from the side scan sonar are absolutely amazing!  Is this typical of the clarity you can expect in most searches?



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Silverfox on December 08, 2007, 09:47:33 PM
Notice now, as just announced on Fox News, that MOS is saying he will drop the CASE and not just the suspects by the end of the year.

So when did it go from suspects to case?  I noticed that is what a couple of the articles quoted him as saying.  Thought at first it was a misquote but this is about the third source saying that same thing.

Case and not just suspects.  I thought the investigation was going to continue but only those three stooges would not be officially considered as suspects.

Sounds as though he is going to close the entire thing down.

.

Methinks Mos might be shrewed like a fox... :cool:

REMEMBER :P ??

If Aruba officially "closes" the case then the FBI OFFICIALLY can investigate...

I am thinking perhaps Mos is ready to turn everything over to the FBI under the International treaty...

Now this, to me makes sense...

Before, it was said that Aruba could/would keep the case open even if the boys were released as suspects. thus ensuring the FBI could NEVER get involved...

But Mos just might be doing a great "Statue of Liberty" play here... BRILLIANT!!! (imho)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Helen Back on December 08, 2007, 09:47:37 PM
Notice now, as just announced on Fox News, that MOS is saying he will drop the CASE and not just the suspects by the end of the year.

So when did it go from suspects to case?  I noticed that is what a couple of the articles quoted him as saying.  Thought at first it was a misquote but this is about the third source saying that same thing.

Case and not just suspects.  I thought the investigation was going to continue but only those three stooges would not be officially considered as suspects.

Sounds as though he is going to close the entire thing down.


Anna,

I heard the same report several times today.  That Mos says he may close the case at the end of the year, if he feels that he doesn't have enough evidence to take it to trial.

Anyone hear the actual interview where Mos makes this statement?  or is this a FOX summary?



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: dennisintn on December 08, 2007, 09:49:45 PM
Well...RU is giving Beth a rest and are back to blaming the MB kids again  :roll:

Monkey Bunkey @ RU wrote:
I'm still holding fast from day one, one of her "friends" dropped the x in her drink on the last night as a prank or in spite. Nasty gurls vying for that spot on the cheerleader team and all. Then it all went wrong when she never returned and they had to keep it quiet.

Someone in MB knows what they did.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

UGHhhhhhhh
 :roll: Now if they all think that 3 young 'boys' who live on Aruba couldn't get rid of Natalee without a trace...how the hell do they think these girls did...what a bunch of losers. :roll:




Since Natalee was no longer in high school, I doubt her "cheerleading" position was a basis for MB girls drugging her.  What part of graduation do they not get?  Guess like Satish, these people never graduated from high school?  Do they really think she would be going back on weekends from college or something!

Talk about dumb as a box of rocks!  They can't even make up good lies.

i'll bet julia can furnish 2 or 3 airport worker "credible witnesses" who saw mb girls hauling a big trunk onto the plane for the trip back to mb. 
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Buckeye on December 08, 2007, 09:52:02 PM
   Electronic Games Research Guide         Provided by
Dictionaries and Research Guides    
Search:
   
   Michael Archer    
Michael Archer
Michael E. Archer is a forensic scientist from New York City. He is a member of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences. He is the chief forensic examiner at New York Forensics, Inc., in Fishkill, New York. Additionally, he is an Investigator in the Dutchess County Medical Examiner's Office. Archer has taught at Marist College in Poughkeepsie, New York & at Mount Saint Mary's College in Newburgh, New York, worked on high profile cases with Henry C. Lee, Ph.D. & Michael Baden, M.D. and appeared on Court T.V. and has been in the New York Times, The Daily News & The New York Post.


Interesting how in this case his findings are completely opposite or what Baden's thoughts are....

Was this from Wiki, too??  The only thing in Fishkill NY, I find is an Expert Witness Co.
If he's been quoted in NY Times etc, I would think there'd be a hit.  My son was quoted in a college newspaper and it comes up.   :roll:
It doesn't say for WHAT. Probably as a "perp" in an artcle for organized crime.

Found this from Court TV:

According to police officer Mike Archer, Glenn told him that during a heated argument with Lynn, she admitted "that she didn't love him, and she had never loved him."

"He said he was going to move out and live with his father," Archer told jurors. "He said he didn't trust her anymore. She wasn't the same person that he married."

"The police department is kind of a rumor mill, isn't it?" Berry asked during cross-examination.

Archer conceded that there were rumors floating around about Lynn at the time.


http://www.courttv.com/trials/turner/050304_ctv.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Magnolia on December 08, 2007, 09:53:25 PM
Notice now, as just announced on Fox News, that MOS is saying he will drop the CASE and not just the suspects by the end of the year.

So when did it go from suspects to case?  I noticed that is what a couple of the articles quoted him as saying.  Thought at first it was a misquote but this is about the third source saying that same thing.

Case and not just suspects.  I thought the investigation was going to continue but only those three stooges would not be officially considered as suspects.

Sounds as though he is going to close the entire thing down.


Anna,

I heard the same report several times today.  That Mos says he may close the case at the end of the year, if he feels that he doesn't have enough evidence to take it to trial.

Anyone hear the actual interview where Mos makes this statement?  or is this a FOX summary?



Everywhere I have seen it quoted it as an AP article.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 08, 2007, 09:54:51 PM
   Electronic Games Research Guide         Provided by
Dictionaries and Research Guides    
Search:
   
   Michael Archer    
Michael Archer
Michael E. Archer is a forensic scientist from New York City. He is a member of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences. He is the chief forensic examiner at New York Forensics, Inc., in Fishkill, New York. Additionally, he is an Investigator in the Dutchess County Medical Examiner's Office. Archer has taught at Marist College in Poughkeepsie, New York & at Mount Saint Mary's College in Newburgh, New York, worked on high profile cases with Henry C. Lee, Ph.D. & Michael Baden, M.D. and appeared on Court T.V. and has been in the New York Times, The Daily News & The New York Post.


Interesting how in this case his findings are completely opposite or what Baden's thoughts are....

Was this from Wiki, too??  The only thing in Fishkill NY, I find is an Expert Witness Co.
If he's been quoted in NY Times etc, I would think there'd be a hit.  My son was quoted in a college newspaper and it comes up.   :roll:

while this contains some extra info, it came from a lame looking search result.  Related to electronic games?  or something?  http://www.123exp-fun.com/t/01151501797/

I am still looking for court tv. etc.


Me too Helen...I did find a Mike Archer that is >>>Mike Archer, Court TV's executive editor........but geeeze, that can't be him, lol.
Still seems weird to me that this guy doesn't have an internet history that appears REAL!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: San on December 08, 2007, 09:55:39 PM
I am sitting here thinking about that Forensic guy that was with Joe T.  I wonder if Joe is going to say Natalee was never at the Sloots I even took my own forensic team to conduct tests at the Sloot Main House.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Blue Moon on December 08, 2007, 10:01:42 PM
You know all this is VERY strange.  On Greta's last week Joe T told her who the judge would be in this case before he even went to Aruba.  The papers would not even report who the judge was, they kept it secret.  How and why did Joe get this information unless someone (the judge maybe) told them ahead of time.  I thought it could have been any judge selected to oversee this. :-|


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: dennisintn on December 08, 2007, 10:05:02 PM
I am sitting here thinking about that Forensic guy that was with Joe T.  I wonder if Joe is going to say Natalee was never at the Sloots I even took my own forensic team to conduct tests at the Sloot Main House.

i like the quote where he can't see enough time for j2k to hide natalee and clean up all the evidence in the timeline.  therefore he concludes that the 3 of them are innocent of anything.  which one of the l0 days they had did they not have time to do all that needed to be done themselves or to find other people to do it?  plus, i know this isn't pc but, who helped him find the exit door on the plane?
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: San on December 08, 2007, 10:07:20 PM
I am sitting here thinking about that Forensic guy that was with Joe T.  I wonder if Joe is going to say Natalee was never at the Sloots I even took my own forensic team to conduct tests at the Sloot Main House.

i like the quote where he can't see enough time for j2k to hide natalee and clean up all the evidence in the timeline.  therefore he concludes that the 3 of them are innocent of anything.  which one of the l0 days they had did they not have time to do all that needed to be done themselves or to find other people to do it?  plus, i know this isn't pc but, who helped him find the exit door on the plane?
dennisintn

He is such a fool.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 08, 2007, 10:07:33 PM
I am sitting here thinking about that Forensic guy that was with Joe T.  I wonder if Joe is going to say Natalee was never at the Sloots I even took my own forensic team to conduct tests at the Sloot Main House.

I would think that the forensic guy is there to dispute anything Mos might have produced in conjunction with what he was touting he had. He clearly said that he could prove Natalee was dead, so maybe Taco thought the arm had been re-examined, or the car seats had been re-tested and blood was found, etc. Wouldn't that have been nice?

OE! Glad you're here! Anything at all you could post for us would be just great and much appreciated!
BTW: You caused me to do some reading last night! You brought to my mind the 10 lepers healed, and only one turned to see the source of the miracle and give praise. "Where are the Nine" was the question.  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 08, 2007, 10:09:36 PM
[
35. Incitements to violence.

36. Any other act for which extradition may be granted in accordance with the laws [*29] of both Contracting Parties.

_______

tm, i think that covers every crime possible except for "runs with scissors" and "playing with matches", but i'll bet there's an aruban law to keep the f.b.i. out or to have access to any of the files, even as incomplete as they are.
dennisintn

Yes but it also says that those to be extradited must have been charged and convicted previously.  And it is a violation of the Dutch Constitution to extradite someone of Dutch nationality.

See:

Article 8 deals with the extradition of nationals. It contains two provisions similar to those included in some of our other recently signed extradition treaties. It grants the Executive Authority the discretionary power to extradite its own nationals. If extradition is denied on the basis of nationality, the requested Party undertakes to submit the case to its competent authorities for the purpose of prosecution, provided that Party has jurisdiction over the offense. This article thus takes into account the law of the Netherlands ordinarily prohibiting the extradition of Dutch nationals but allowing for their prosecution in the Netherlands for offenses committed abroad.  
[/quote]


The Dutch do not extradite Dutch Nationals.  It is against their Constitution.

Therefore, any Dutch citizen is always going to be going before one of those famous Dutch judges who never met a suspect they didn't like.

Now isn't THAT special!

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: oceanexploration on December 08, 2007, 10:11:58 PM
Good sonar imagery depends largely on the sum quality of the sonar, operator, terrain, and the sonar processing. The images you saw are excellent quality with little noise or motion artifacts. In deeper water, say a couple hundred feet, the noise from the sea surface becomes less and less an issue.  The rougher the water, the more motion artifacts and sea surface noise is in the data.  A passing boat makes a mess out of the data, as do schools of fish, or other biology.  Irregular seafloor geology can make things complicated. Say for example you have a rocks outcropping and coral pinnacles.  Seabed features with positive relief will reflect the sound pulse and leave an acoustic shadow behind the feature.  If what you are searching for is in that shadow, it will not be imaged.  Hopefully it will be imaged on a subsequent adjacent pass or from a different direction.  Usually searches are performed in a "mowing the lawn" pattern, with cross lines perpendicular to the main search lines.  Running the search lines with adjacent lines run reciprocal combined with tie-lines gives you horizontal and lateral control of your target position.  Typically you'll have a sonar target imaged on multiple passes where that target is co-aligned between lines after processing. If the target is imaged on multiple passes from different directions and the target doesn't change locations, you've got the correct target location.  Else, its somewhere in the middle.  With swift currents and cable lengths of about 1 mile, good positioning is critical. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Observer on December 08, 2007, 10:14:13 PM
You know all this is VERY strange.  On Greta's last week Joe T told her who the judge would be in this case before he even went to Aruba.  The papers would not even report who the judge was, they kept it secret.  How and why did Joe get this information unless someone (the judge maybe) told them ahead of time.  I thought it could have been any judge selected to oversee this. :-|

Thats what Rammstein wants you to believe. That it's completely random and unbiased and no one knows which judge it will be. It was the same corrupt Judge as back in 2005 Rick Smid. The whole Mos thing was a complete sham and was in totally inline with this ridiculous outrageous cover up. I seriously doubt he did a complete 180 after seeing how corrupt the defense and the Arubans are..They have had this case since Aug 2006 and had ample opportunity to expose the dirtbags that destroyed evidence,changed statements,intimdated witnesses and killed the investigation. It's quite telling if he closes this case without even going for the lesser charges or letting this all play out in front of a judge. The Van Der Sloots werent worried and even Renho messed up the cover up memo when she reported Joran would be released a day early.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: oceanexploration on December 08, 2007, 10:18:35 PM
Crazybabyborg...
I was asked last night:
"Do I believe in Miracles and are we expecting one?"
This was my reply:
I say this with absolute conviction... I do not have enough faith to be an atheist in times like this.  It is examples such as these that remind humanity that people still go out of their way for others. About 2000 years ago there was the perfect example of a loving sacrifice.  So do I expect a miracle?  Perhaps a better question is... what are our expectations of that miracle?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Blue Moon on December 08, 2007, 10:20:48 PM
You know all this is VERY strange.  On Greta's last week Joe T told her who the judge would be in this case before he even went to Aruba.  The papers would not even report who the judge was, they kept it secret.  How and why did Joe get this information unless someone (the judge maybe) told them ahead of time.  I thought it could have been any judge selected to oversee this. :-|

Thats what Rammstein wants you to believe. That it's completely random and unbiased and no one knows which judge it will be. It was the same corrupt Judge as back in 2005 Rick Smid. The whole Mos thing was a complete sham and was in totally inline with this ridiculous outrageous cover up. I seriously doubt he did a complete 180 after seeing how corrupt the defense and the Arubans are..They have had this case since Aug 2006 and had ample opportunity to expose the dirtbags that destroyed evidence,changed statements,intimdated witnesses and killed the investigation. It's quite telling if he closes this case without even going for the lesser charges or letting this all play out in front of a judge. Its all a SHAM

My point is WHY did Joe T. have to know this and announce it on T.V.?  Was this judge in someone's pocket from the get-go?  Wonder what kind of cases the judge has done in the past?  Wonder what his track record is?  I said this on BFN one time-Paulus and a couple of the judge's need to be looked into.  Something is fishy big time and Joe T. (MO) is involved in this from day 1.  Is it drugs, cartels, the mob or all the above (I am just thinking out loud and only my opinion on this).


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: robots on December 08, 2007, 10:25:09 PM
people like the ones in this fiasco..... are not human

patience.... is not easy

soon enough - someone is going to talk because joran or paulus will tick someone off

and more than likely it will be the K2 brothers that talk

hang tight  :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: nonesuche on December 08, 2007, 10:26:30 PM
Crazybabyborg...
I was asked last night:
"Do I believe in Miracles and are we expecting one?"
This was my reply:
I say this with absolute conviction... I do not have enough faith to be an atheist in times like this.  It is examples such as these that remind humanity that people still go out of their way for others. About 2000 years ago there was the perfect example of a loving sacrifice.  So do I expect a miracle?  Perhaps a better question is... what are our expectations of that miracle?

Thank you so much for all you are contributing to the quest for Natalee, but also 'educating' us about your techniques and tools. I googled you too but not to find photos, but discovered while even in college you were involved at Woods Hole, what a fascinating career you have had.

Welcome - we appreciate the opportunity to share this journey with you.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Observer on December 08, 2007, 10:28:45 PM

My point is WHY did Joe T. have to know this and announce it on T.V.?  Was this judge in someone's pocket from the get-go?  Wonder what kind of cases the judge has done in the past?  Wonder what his track record is?  I said this on BFN one time-Paulus and a couple of the judge's need to be looked into.  Something is fishy big time and Joe T. (MO) is involved in this from day 1.  Is it drugs, cartels, the mob or all the above (I am just thinking out loud and only my opinion on this).

All the above is what runs Aruba. Just seems to me that it is the American Mob that is involved here with connections to Posner. Not sure if that is because who is involved from Aruba or because the victim was American. I can see it both ways who is financing all of this(Posner,Cartel or Aruban Govt). Certainly would be easy for the Aruban Govt to launder up some dirty drug money. One deicent size cocaine bust would cover all of this.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: AZLady on December 08, 2007, 10:29:57 PM
Michael Archer has several documents in the Dutchess County, NY, Document Search at http://www.co.dutchess.ny.us/CountyGov/Departments/CountyClerk/12976.htm .  Most recently, he has been a defendent in a lawsuit brought by the Hudson Valley FCU (Federal Credit Union) for $35,000.  Odd that I can't find him employed by Dutchess County, though, as the wiki article states.  From a researcher's standpoint, wiki is crap, pure crap.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Observer on December 08, 2007, 10:34:04 PM
Hi everyone! Not much to report for the update today.  Weather is still bad and is making the go slow.  The Persistence will persist and plug through though!  She has a job to do and she and the crew will get there to do the job! 

Thanks for the prayers! Please continue them until we bring Natalee home.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: nonesuche on December 08, 2007, 10:34:57 PM
Anna - the Harpo reference made me tear up with laughter, thanks for that one  :lol:

I don't know if Private Eye is reading tonight but Klaas and some others of us had copious discussion regarding the uncanny likeness of Paulus at the gaming table that night next to Natalee. Ultimately we relied heavily close-up's Klaas made of the hairline, the arms, even the watch. Knowing Klaas I am sure she's got those in her photobucket.

Other points to ponder are this, let's suppose for now that Paulus was involved, that perhaps Joran and Daddy-O were misbehaving while mommy harpo was away? It would not be the first time a father/son or even mother/daughter team have preyed upon others for sexual excapades or even debauchery.

The scale of this cover-up is one element I've never been able to satisfy was generated to protect even the dutch son of a judge, it's too large and too wide and too tight to be just for Joran. I've always felt that implied that either larger people in terms of stature were involved and were being protected, or events that transpire on that island that are part of their 'underworld' are what's being protected.

If you do have an underworld, who better than the mob lawyer extraordinaire Joe T to help you cover it up?

Makes sense me, always has.......as Mrs often says water seeks it's own level, indeed the Sloots and Joe T personify that.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: AZLady on December 08, 2007, 10:35:02 PM
If you want to write to Michael Archer, his address is
Archer Michael E Po Box 28 Fishkill Ny

He lives at the Commons At Fishkill Condo Unit 902D.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Helen Back on December 08, 2007, 10:35:54 PM
I can't even find anything about New York Forensics, Inc., in Fishkill, New York., where Michale Archer is the chief forensic examiner.  I'm coming up pretty empty on this.







Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: AZLady on December 08, 2007, 10:37:09 PM
My opinion--Archer is a local flunkie that Joe Taco picked up to take to Aruba with him to pose as an expert.  None of his credentials check out and his wiki entry is newly made, most likely by the Renho herself.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: AZSunny on December 08, 2007, 10:39:35 PM
My opinion--Archer is a local flunkie that Joe Taco picked up to take to Aruba with him to pose as an expert.  None of his credentials check out and his wiki entry is newly made, most likely by the Renho herself.

Is there a way to ask Dr. Baden about him? 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Buckeye on December 08, 2007, 10:43:04 PM
My opinion--Archer is a local flunkie that Joe Taco picked up to take to Aruba with him to pose as an expert.  None of his credentials check out and his wiki entry is newly made, most likely by the Renho herself.

 :smt045 :smt045 :smt045

Boy, do I agree!!  Her ALE buddies are probably impressed as all get out with the guy.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: AZLady on December 08, 2007, 10:53:56 PM
I'm not impressed with his fuzzy credentials, but the recent $35,000 judgement against him in court leads me to believe that he is in dire financial straits and not a successful professional.  Gee, I wonder if Tacky convinced him to go to Aruba and pretend to be a forensic pathologist just for the free trip or if he had to pay him, cash under the table, of course.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Magnolia on December 08, 2007, 10:58:27 PM

My point is WHY did Joe T. have to know this and announce it on T.V.?  Was this judge in someone's pocket from the get-go?  Wonder what kind of cases the judge has done in the past?  Wonder what his track record is?  I said this on BFN one time-Paulus and a couple of the judge's need to be looked into.  Something is fishy big time and Joe T. (MO) is involved in this from day 1.  Is it drugs, cartels, the mob or all the above (I am just thinking out loud and only my opinion on this).

All the above is what runs Aruba. Just seems to me that it is the American Mob that is involved here with connections to Posner. Not sure if that is because who is involved from Aruba or because the victim was American. I can see it both ways who is financing all of this(Posner,Cartel or Aruban Govt). Certainly would be easy for the Aruban Govt to launder up some dirty drug money. One deicent size cocaine bust would cover all of this.

I agree with the above....but the question to me is WHY?  Why would the Mob or the Arubian Gov't or a drug cartel care one whit about Joran VanderSloot and his sweaty papa?  That is one piece of the puzzle that I have never found.
I have always thought Posner was in this up to his eyeballs.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: AZLady on December 08, 2007, 10:59:23 PM
Interesting.  In 1999 I see Michael Archer filed a pistol permit application in Fishkill County, NY.  Now why would a forensic pathologist need to carry a pistol?  Hmm...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: AZLady on December 08, 2007, 11:00:16 PM
Correction--Dutchess County, NY, not Fishkill County.  My bad.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Buckeye on December 08, 2007, 11:02:50 PM
Interesting.  In 1999 I see Michael Archer filed a pistol permit application in Fishkill County, NY.  Now why would a forensic pathologist need to carry a pistol?  Hmm...

Lies when he testifies and people get mad??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: nonesuche on December 08, 2007, 11:03:08 PM
Magnolia-

Paulus was special assistant to Rudy Croes prior, his express duty/domain was over contracts. If you're over contracts on this tiny island then every legitimate and also non-legitimate business is in your scope. The word kick-back's might also have some relevance here as well.

night all


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Buckeye on December 08, 2007, 11:05:31 PM

My point is WHY did Joe T. have to know this and announce it on T.V.?  Was this judge in someone's pocket from the get-go?  Wonder what kind of cases the judge has done in the past?  Wonder what his track record is?  I said this on BFN one time-Paulus and a couple of the judge's need to be looked into.  Something is fishy big time and Joe T. (MO) is involved in this from day 1.  Is it drugs, cartels, the mob or all the above (I am just thinking out loud and only my opinion on this).

All the above is what runs Aruba. Just seems to me that it is the American Mob that is involved here with connections to Posner. Not sure if that is because who is involved from Aruba or because the victim was American. I can see it both ways who is financing all of this(Posner,Cartel or Aruban Govt). Certainly would be easy for the Aruban Govt to launder up some dirty drug money. One deicent size cocaine bust would cover all of this.

I agree with the above....but the question to me is WHY?  Why would the Mob or the Arubian Gov't or a drug cartel care one whit about Joran VanderSloot and his sweaty papa?  That is one piece of the puzzle that I have never found.
I have always thought Posner was in this up to his eyeballs.

Paulus worked on contracts and probably was very tight with the Ministers.  Maybe he has his second set of books locked up or he's in partnership and if he goes down or his kid, the books are open.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Magnolia on December 08, 2007, 11:07:24 PM
Birmingham television just had a report on the Natalee case.
Interview with Joe T....he spewed more of his stuff that his client was
absolutely not guilty.
Then Mos....who said that he wanted the truth to come forward
and he would make every effort to make sure that happened.
He said that the case is not closed.
Then JQK....and this was good...he had a twinkle in his eye.
He said that the investigation was botched from the beginning
and there was corruption from within.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 08, 2007, 11:09:57 PM
WTF???  I'm gone for a few hours and come back to see this??? I'm still back on page 5..will catch up in a minute. :shock: :shock:  :lol:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/pvdszipper.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: AZLady on December 08, 2007, 11:10:49 PM
Rather than a forensic pathologist, I fear our Michael Archer was a rather unsuccessful undertaker in Beacon, NY.  In 1999, he and the funeral parlor he owned and lived at was sued by two separate parties with resulting judgements of $24,690 and $1650. 

Gee, it must not be too much of a leap from unsuccessful undertaker to forensic pathologist, eh?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: San on December 08, 2007, 11:11:08 PM
Birmingham television just had a report on the Natalee case.
Interview with Joe T....he spewed more of his stuff that his client was
absolutely not guilty.
Then Mos....who said that he wanted the truth to come forward
and he would make every effort to make sure that happened.
He said that the case is not closed.
Then JQK....and this was good...he had a twinkle in his eye.
He said that the investigation was botched from the beginning
and there was corruption from within.


About time JQK said corruption.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Observer on December 08, 2007, 11:14:21 PM

I agree with the above....but the question to me is WHY?  Why would the Mob or the Arubian Gov't or a drug cartel care one whit about Joran VanderSloot and his sweaty papa?  That is one piece of the puzzle that I have never found.
I have always thought Posner was in this up to his eyeballs.

WHY is right? I wish I had the definite answers. It appears the Dutch aren't doing a damn thing about it either.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Helen Back on December 08, 2007, 11:14:53 PM
Well, Frank suggested that Paulus's background needs digging into and I agree.  I always wondered what the story behind the failed judge in training fiasco was. 

As for Rick Smid, the only thing I can find on him is a recent money laundering case he is presiding over on another island, and his signature on the US Resolution for a Federal Commission on Drug Policy, www.druglibrary.net/resolution/longlist.htm.  You would think in the midst of so much controversy regarding Rick Smid's release of Joran in 2005, they would have sent anyone but him.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Magnolia on December 08, 2007, 11:15:06 PM
Rather than a forensic pathologist, I fear our Michael Archer was a rather unsuccessful undertaker in Beacon, NY.  In 1999, he and the funeral parlor he owned and lived at was sued by two separate parties with resulting judgements of $24,690 and $1650. 

Gee, it must not be too much of a leap from unsuccessful undertaker to forensic pathologist, eh?

You just made my day AZLady.  That is the funniest thing.  Add it to his Wiki article.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Scandi on December 08, 2007, 11:15:36 PM
It would have been awful if we went all the way to Aruba to find out the side scan sonar and ROV was incapable of the tasks we require.  The sea trials served to both get the gear working on board the Persistence and to prove their adequacy. If you think it would be interesting, I could post a sample of the sea trial data. The side scan sonar data is fantastic.

Hi OceanExploration,  What a treat to have you here.  Sorry I had to leave for a bit, and now you are offline, but what a nice surprise to meet you here.  I would love to see a sample of the sea trial data. 

I know a little bit about side sonar and how it works.  During the Scott Peterson trial I came to know and correspond with Gene Ralston, that salty 'ole Captain   :D, and I learned quite a bit about the basics through emails.  In fact I was one of the posters {there were actually many of us} who saw what his camera that was attached to the ROV was recording after the SS had spotted what looked like a body in San Francisco Bay on March 14th of 2003.  They had seen her too, Sgt Cloward standing beside him, but the line to the monitor on board the ship had problems, wrong cable.  Even so, there was some footage captured which showed up on Greta's On The Record, live and in living color.  I'll never forget it!  I did do a pencil sketch right away so I wouldn't forget what I saw, and pull it out from time to time for posterity's sake! 

Gene did write and say what I saw was very similar to what they did that day.  He said they saw crabs everywhere on her and so couldn't see clothing, but there were streams of light colored fabric that appeared to be floating above her.  I saw her with lines across, as though she had been wrapped like a mummy.  Turns out what I was seeking was either the crabs or those shredded tatters of her jeans.  It was after her remains washed ashore that he knew it was L

I am so happy you are a part of our group.  Kind of an amazing group of people here, OceanExploration, such a beautifully run sight as well.  Welcome Aboard mate and will  absolutely read everything you give to us.  ;}


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 08, 2007, 11:15:44 PM
(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Holloway/Pauluscasino2.jpg)

The thing I am asking if is a camera is at Paulus left elbow, not directly in front of him.  It could be a small video camera even.  Appears to have a wide strap. 

I think it is a prop he used in his ruse along with Joran to play the role of tourist. 

Also recall Anita mentioning her camera at great length.  There is a reason she did that.

Is this her camera and Paulus is using Mommy's camera as a prop to appear to the tourist girls to also be a tourist as we know Joran claimed to be?

Just another of those strange coincidents it is now appearing we will never have answers for.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: robots on December 08, 2007, 11:21:25 PM
in the picture it looks like paulus is drinking something

i bet he was drunk as hell...

man, dont i hate him


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Helen Back on December 08, 2007, 11:23:45 PM

I agree with the above....but the question to me is WHY?  Why would the Mob or the Arubian Gov't or a drug cartel care one whit about Joran VanderSloot and his sweaty papa?  That is one piece of the puzzle that I have never found.
I have always thought Posner was in this up to his eyeballs.

WHY is right? I wish I had the definite answers. It appears the Dutch aren't doing a damn thing about it either.

Well, PVDS is at the heart of the matter, IMO. 



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: robots on December 08, 2007, 11:24:05 PM
(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Holloway/Pauluscasino2.jpg)

The thing I am asking if is a camera is at Paulus left elbow, not directly in front of him.  It could be a small video camera even.  Appears to have a wide strap. 

I think it is a prop he used in his ruse along with Joran to play the role of tourist. 

Also recall Anita mentioning her camera at great length.  There is a reason she did that.

Is this her camera and Paulus is using Mommy's camera as a prop to appear to the tourist girls to also be a tourist as we know Joran claimed to be?

Just another of those strange coincidents it is now appearing we will never have answers for.

.

yes, a strap of some kind



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Puzzler on December 08, 2007, 11:25:35 PM
(http://img129.imageshack.us/img129/8895/capta87b92480ed84807b7dgx3.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)
Paulus van der Sloot, forensic scientist Michael Archer, Anita van der Sloot and attorney Joseph Tacopina are seen early Friday, Dec. 7, 2007, before the release of Joran van der Sloot, in Oranjestad, Aruba. A judge in Aruba ordered the release Friday of the last of three suspects re-arrested last month in the disappearance of American teenager Natalee Holloway, ruling the evidence was not strong enough to continue holding him.
---------------------------------
(http://img510.imageshack.us/img510/4848/capt6aa55ae3cc974d8bb45jf5.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)
Anita van der Sloot, left, reacts as her attorney Rosemarie Arnold givers her the news of the release of her son Joran van der Sloot, Friday, Dec. 7, 2007, in Oranjestad, Aruba. A judge in Aruba ordered the release Friday of the last of three suspects re-arrested last month in the disappearance of American teenager Natalee Holloway, ruling the evidence was not strong enough to continue holding him

Paulus - beyond words

Taco - every picture I've ever seen him in he's standing with his legs wide apart and looks like he's getting ready to jump at something - maybe he thinks he looks macho...I think he looks weird.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 08, 2007, 11:29:10 PM
PUZZLER WROTE:
Paulus - beyond words

Taco - every picture I've ever seen him in he's standing with his legs wide apart and looks like he's getting ready to jump at something - maybe he thinks he looks macho...I think he looks weird.
[/b]

Or a Bad case of Jock Itch.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: robots on December 08, 2007, 11:29:41 PM
(http://img129.imageshack.us/img129/8895/capta87b92480ed84807b7dgx3.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)
Paulus van der Sloot, forensic scientist Michael Archer, Anita van der Sloot and attorney Joseph Tacopina are seen early Friday, Dec. 7, 2007, before the release of Joran van der Sloot, in Oranjestad, Aruba. A judge in Aruba ordered the release Friday of the last of three suspects re-arrested last month in the disappearance of American teenager Natalee Holloway, ruling the evidence was not strong enough to continue holding him.
---------------------------------
(http://img510.imageshack.us/img510/4848/capt6aa55ae3cc974d8bb45jf5.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)
Anita van der Sloot, left, reacts as her attorney Rosemarie Arnold givers her the news of the release of her son Joran van der Sloot, Friday, Dec. 7, 2007, in Oranjestad, Aruba. A judge in Aruba ordered the release Friday of the last of three suspects re-arrested last month in the disappearance of American teenager Natalee Holloway, ruling the evidence was not strong enough to continue holding him

Paulus - beyond words

Taco - every picture I've ever seen him in he's standing with his legs wide apart and looks like he's getting ready to jump at something - maybe he thinks he looks macho...I think he looks weird.

he is so used to JUMPING thru hoops - he cant help it

i agree - he is a NUT CASE- he has to be to be touching these people

i would be looking for an industrial cleaner...after being within 50 feet of them

but i think between paulus grease and JOE T grease they may have come upon a new GREASE for SCUM BAGS


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: robots on December 08, 2007, 11:30:59 PM
if you ask me, paulus and anita been hitting the booze pretty hard

they look horrible  :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: San on December 08, 2007, 11:31:39 PM
(http://img129.imageshack.us/img129/8895/capta87b92480ed84807b7dgx3.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)
Paulus van der Sloot, forensic scientist Michael Archer, Anita van der Sloot and attorney Joseph Tacopina are seen early Friday, Dec. 7, 2007, before the release of Joran van der Sloot, in Oranjestad, Aruba. A judge in Aruba ordered the release Friday of the last of three suspects re-arrested last month in the disappearance of American teenager Natalee Holloway, ruling the evidence was not strong enough to continue holding him.
---------------------------------
(http://img510.imageshack.us/img510/4848/capt6aa55ae3cc974d8bb45jf5.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)
Anita van der Sloot, left, reacts as her attorney Rosemarie Arnold givers her the news of the release of her son Joran van der Sloot, Friday, Dec. 7, 2007, in Oranjestad, Aruba. A judge in Aruba ordered the release Friday of the last of three suspects re-arrested last month in the disappearance of American teenager Natalee Holloway, ruling the evidence was not strong enough to continue holding him

Paulus - beyond words

Taco - every picture I've ever seen him in he's standing with his legs wide apart and looks like he's getting ready to jump at something - maybe he thinks he looks macho...I think he looks weird.

He really is disgusting.

Joe T. looks like he is trying to keep away from Anita.  He has that look on his face like oh god please don't touch me I just took a shower.

Anita is just horrendous.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 08, 2007, 11:32:03 PM
(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Holloway/Pauluscasino2.jpg)

The thing I am asking if is a camera is at Paulus left elbow, not directly in front of him.  It could be a small video camera even.  Appears to have a wide strap. 

I think it is a prop he used in his ruse along with Joran to play the role of tourist. 

Also recall Anita mentioning her camera at great length.  There is a reason she did that.

Is this her camera and Paulus is using Mommy's camera as a prop to appear to the tourist girls to also be a tourist as we know Joran claimed to be?

Just another of those strange coincidents it is now appearing we will never have answers for.

.

yes, a strap of some kind




Robots,

Again, you are my hero as evidently you are the only other one who can see it!

 :smt058

Yes, it has a wide black strap like something that tacky Anita would stick on her camera she was whining about the police taking. 

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Observer on December 08, 2007, 11:32:43 PM
Robots:

In both short clips at the casino I have seen lately he hits his drink hard. He even kinda grimaces(Not the right word)after drinking a big drink in the video and puts his head down like it was strong. Did Paul just learn that he's a failure and will never be a judge? Did he get hammered the night Natalee went missing? I wonder if that person in the video is drinking the same drink that PVDS has here?

(http://img101.imageshack.us/img101/3016/pvdskc5.png) (http://imageshack.us)




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Magnolia on December 08, 2007, 11:33:33 PM
if you ask me, paulus and anita been hitting the booze pretty hard

they look horrible  :cool:

Robots did you notice Joe T's man boobs?

Paulus and Anita do look like they are drinking....got that bloated look.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 08, 2007, 11:33:50 PM
if you ask me, paulus and anita been hitting the booze pretty hard

they look horrible  :cool:


Too drunk to zip his pants, evidently, too.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 08, 2007, 11:33:53 PM
Whatcha wanna bet that Anita and Rosmary's Baby were at the International School gathering documentation that Joran was in attendance the day Natalee went missing? I'm sure Anita had no problem arranging that.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: San on December 08, 2007, 11:34:48 PM
I cant even look at the picture of Paulus anymore he is just repulsive.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: robots on December 08, 2007, 11:34:49 PM
OMG


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: robots on December 08, 2007, 11:35:38 PM
between them there is 3/4 of a ton of BULL CRAP

 :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: robots on December 08, 2007, 11:36:46 PM
if you ask me, paulus and anita been hitting the booze pretty hard

they look horrible  :cool:


Too drunk to zip his pants, evidently, too.



yep
my goodnesss..........i can tell you that that man in the casino is PAULUS




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 08, 2007, 11:36:54 PM
He really is disgusting.

Joe T. looks like he is trying to keep away from Anita.  He has that look on his face like oh god please don't touch me I just took a shower.

Anita is just horrendous.

He is acting as though she smells bad but it could be that hair is scaring him.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 08, 2007, 11:38:08 PM
OMG

Anita, but don't make me pull out that see through to the playtex full figure slingshot!

Ya'll have noticed the school in the background of the pic of Anita and Arnold, right?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 08, 2007, 11:39:12 PM
"We promised the suspects that after Dec. 31, we will not pursue the case," Mos said. "This investigation should end at a certain point."


I still want to know when it went from releasing the suspects to ending the investigation.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: San on December 08, 2007, 11:39:54 PM
OMG

Anita, but don't make me pull out that see through to the playtex full figure slingshot!

Ya'll have noticed the school in the background of the pic of Anita and Arnold, right?

Which is bigger Anita's belly or her boobs.   Or is it a tie. :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: robots on December 08, 2007, 11:40:22 PM
LOL


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Magnolia on December 08, 2007, 11:42:18 PM
Whatcha wanna bet that Anita and Rosmary's Baby were at the International School gathering documentation that Joran was in attendance the day Natalee went missing? I'm sure Anita had no problem arranging that.

Not until you mentioned it......does Rosemary have a hand full of money?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: robots on December 08, 2007, 11:42:20 PM
"We promised the suspects that after Dec. 31, we will not pursue the case," Mos said. "This investigation should end at a certain point."


I still want to know when it went from releasing the suspects to ending the investigation.

.
:idea:

when MOS was told to SHUT UP


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 08, 2007, 11:43:12 PM
OMG

Anita, but don't make me pull out that see through to the playtex full figure slingshot!

Ya'll have noticed the school in the background of the pic of Anita and Arnold, right?

CBB,
I vote for Joe T but Anita's stomach now extends farther than hers which is saying something!  Maybe she's pregnant with another little devil spawn.

Yes, they were at the school probably falsifying records or something equally disgusting.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: San on December 08, 2007, 11:43:14 PM
LOL

 :lol: :lol: :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 08, 2007, 11:43:52 PM
OMG

Anita, but don't make me pull out that see through to the playtex full figure slingshot!

Ya'll have noticed the school in the background of the pic of Anita and Arnold, right?

Which is bigger Anita's belly or her boobs.   Or is it a tie. :lol:

Not even a photo finish.........Belly. That pic is an advertisement for Sumo Wrestling. They just need thongs and top knots. 
EEEEEEEWWWWWWW


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Observer on December 08, 2007, 11:44:55 PM
Jamie@BFN posted a video that I havent seen yet after Joran's release and the Kalpoe lawsuit

http://tinyurl.com/2rjfxm


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Blue Moon on December 08, 2007, 11:46:16 PM
Is that money in Arnolds hand?  Is that the payoff and she is holding on to it until Joran walks out the door? :lol: :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: robots on December 08, 2007, 11:47:24 PM
if you ask me, paulus and anita been hitting the booze pretty hard

they look horrible  :cool:

Robots did you notice Joe T's man boobs?

Paulus and Anita do look like they are drinking....got that bloated look.

yep, hitting the sauce a little heavy. i predicted this 2 months ago

they know there son drown Natalee and now they are trying to drown themselves


funny how the human mind works


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 08, 2007, 11:47:35 PM
Whatcha wanna bet that Anita and Rosmary's Baby were at the International School gathering documentation that Joran was in attendance the day Natalee went missing? I'm sure Anita had no problem arranging that.

Not until you mentioned it......does Rosemary have a hand full of money?

How else are they supposed to secure the story they want if they can't to buy it? Got to have that cash in hand ready to whip out!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 08, 2007, 11:48:10 PM
if you ask me, paulus and anita been hitting the booze pretty hard

they look horrible  :cool:


Too drunk to zip his pants, evidently, too.



yep
my goodnesss..........i can tell you that that man in the casino is PAULUS





Next he will prolly be peeing his pants and passing out on sidewalks like Joran.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: robots on December 08, 2007, 11:48:45 PM
(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Holloway/Pauluscasino2.jpg)

The thing I am asking if is a camera is at Paulus left elbow, not directly in front of him.  It could be a small video camera even.  Appears to have a wide strap. 

I think it is a prop he used in his ruse along with Joran to play the role of tourist. 

Also recall Anita mentioning her camera at great length.  There is a reason she did that.

Is this her camera and Paulus is using Mommy's camera as a prop to appear to the tourist girls to also be a tourist as we know Joran claimed to be?

Just another of those strange coincidents it is now appearing we will never have answers for.

.

yes, a strap of some kind




Robots,

Again, you are my hero as evidently you are the only other one who can see it!

 :smt058

Yes, it has a wide black strap like something that tacky Anita would stick on her camera she was whining about the police taking. 

.

i saw it immediately  :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: robots on December 08, 2007, 11:50:16 PM
if you ask me, paulus and anita been hitting the booze pretty hard

they look horrible  :cool:


Too drunk to zip his pants, evidently, too.



yep
my goodnesss..........i can tell you that that man in the casino is PAULUS





Next he will prolly be peeing his pants and passing out on sidewalks like Joran.

.

im sure he will



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 08, 2007, 11:50:18 PM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/casino3op4.jpg)

Could be a camera

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/CasinoCamera.jpg)

Similar to this - I know it's not like this one but could be similar

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/camera.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 08, 2007, 11:51:52 PM
Jamie@BFN posted a video that I havent seen yet after Joran's release and the Kalpoe lawsuit

http://tinyurl.com/2rjfxm

Hadn't seen it, *******. Thank you for posting the link.

Pretty Much tells it all, doesn't it?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: San on December 08, 2007, 11:52:22 PM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/casino3op4.jpg)

Could be a camera

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/CasinoCamera.jpg)

Similar to this - I know it's not like this one but could be similar

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/camera.jpg)

Was Paulus taking pictures of the young American girls for someone?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: robots on December 08, 2007, 11:56:25 PM
when you  invert the colors ..it is DEFINATELY a camera  :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Magnolia on December 08, 2007, 11:57:43 PM
Is it Scuba Jap that is the photographer for that paper?
You would think she would have noticed the unzipped
pants before printing that picture to the paper.
I think that picture complete with Klaas's arrow need to go
on the front page.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Observer on December 08, 2007, 11:57:59 PM
Could even be a small videocam.IMO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 08, 2007, 11:59:13 PM
(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Holloway/Pauluscasino2.jpg)

The thing I am asking if is a camera is at Paulus left elbow, not directly in front of him.  It could be a small video camera even.  Appears to have a wide strap. 

I think it is a prop he used in his ruse along with Joran to play the role of tourist. 

Also recall Anita mentioning her camera at great length.  There is a reason she did that.

Is this her camera and Paulus is using Mommy's camera as a prop to appear to the tourist girls to also be a tourist as we know Joran claimed to be?

Just another of those strange coincidents it is now appearing we will never have answers for.

.

yes, a strap of some kind




Robots,

Again, you are my hero as evidently you are the only other one who can see it!

 :smt058

Yes, it has a wide black strap like something that tacky Anita would stick on her camera she was whining about the police taking. 

.

i saw it immediately  :cool:

I knew you would!

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Prayer%20Thanks%20Compliment/2mper88_th.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Observer on December 09, 2007, 12:00:50 AM
Jamie@BFN posted a video that I havent seen yet after Joran's release and the Kalpoe lawsuit

http://tinyurl.com/2rjfxm

Hadn't seen it, *******. Thank you for posting the link.

Pretty Much tells it all, doesn't it?

Hi CBB :)

Yes it does. They can close this case but it's far from over.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: AZLady on December 09, 2007, 12:01:19 AM
It must be Anita's camera.  Remember she said they took her camera in the search of the house and she whined about her school projects that were on it.  I bet she didn't know Paulus had the camera with him the night he and Joran met Natalee.  I would guess that this particular casino video and other video from that night showed PVDS with a small silver camera--thus they took Anita's camera in the search. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Puzzler on December 09, 2007, 12:02:06 AM
(http://img129.imageshack.us/img129/8895/capta87b92480ed84807b7dgx3.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)
Paulus van der Sloot, forensic scientist Michael Archer, Anita van der Sloot and attorney Joseph Tacopina are seen early Friday, Dec. 7, 2007, before the release of Joran van der Sloot, in Oranjestad, Aruba. A judge in Aruba ordered the release Friday of the last of three suspects re-arrested last month in the disappearance of American teenager Natalee Holloway, ruling the evidence was not strong enough to continue holding him.
---------------------------------
(http://img510.imageshack.us/img510/4848/capt6aa55ae3cc974d8bb45jf5.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)
Anita van der Sloot, left, reacts as her attorney Rosemarie Arnold givers her the news of the release of her son Joran van der Sloot, Friday, Dec. 7, 2007, in Oranjestad, Aruba. A judge in Aruba ordered the release Friday of the last of three suspects re-arrested last month in the disappearance of American teenager Natalee Holloway, ruling the evidence was not strong enough to continue holding him

Robots, weren't you the one that speculated that Taco was getting paid by Paulus in "grease"?
Paulus - beyond words

Taco - every picture I've ever seen him in he's standing with his legs wide apart and looks like he's getting ready to jump at something - maybe he thinks he looks macho...I think he looks weird.

he is so used to JUMPING thru hoops - he cant help it

i agree - he is a NUT CASE- he has to be to be touching these people

i would be looking for an industrial cleaner...after being within 50 feet of them

but i think between paulus grease and JOE T grease they may have come upon a new GREASE for SCUM BAGS


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 09, 2007, 12:02:34 AM
Ugh . I didn't thnk it was possible for Anita to look worse.
She has put one some ugly weight. And she's at that age where her age is showing. Nice pants, I used to have a canvas beach chair like that.   
But I threw it away becasue it was ugly.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 09, 2007, 12:03:23 AM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/casino3op4.jpg)

Could be a camera

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/CasinoCamera.jpg)

Similar to this - I know it's not like this one but could be similar

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/camera.jpg)

Could be a cell phone:

(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/Case/cell-phone.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 09, 2007, 12:03:24 AM
It must be Anita's camera.  Remember she said they took her camera in the search of the house and she whined about her school projects that were on it.  I bet she didn't know Paulus had the camera with him the night he and Joran met Natalee.  I would guess that this particular casino video and other video from that night showed PVDS with a small silver camera--thus they took Anita's camera in the search. 

Exactly!  That's what I have been saying but no one reads my posts except my Robots.   :smt052


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Puzzler on December 09, 2007, 12:03:37 AM
Robots:

In both short clips at the casino I have seen lately he hits his drink hard. He even kinda grimaces(Not the right word)after drinking a big drink in the video and puts his head down like it was strong. Did Paul just learn that he's a failure and will never be a judge? Did he get hammered the night Natalee went missing? I wonder if that person in the video is drinking the same drink that PVDS has here?

(http://img101.imageshack.us/img101/3016/pvdskc5.png) (http://imageshack.us)





Looks like Paulus has a wedding ring on his right hand in this picture, too.





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Magnolia on December 09, 2007, 12:05:19 AM
How did ABC get that casino video?  I can't remember.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Helen Back on December 09, 2007, 12:05:27 AM
Could even be a small videocam.IMO

Yep it looks like a camera to me.  Looks a lot like my camera/video cam, small screen viewer.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: amanda on December 09, 2007, 12:06:58 AM
Wow; so that new prosecutor actually said that they (meaning he and his associates, I take it) promised the suspects that they wouldn't prosecute the case after the end of this year!  Big incentive for them to talk; I mean, really, he had to be aware of their previous incarcerations and their ability to keep quiet.  I hate to admit this, but this latest farce appears to have been nothing more than a choreographed act to try to appease prospective tourists prior to their closing the case.  I really hope that they find that they've not only underestimated prospective tourists, but enraged them with these blatent insults to intelligence.  Wow.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Scandi on December 09, 2007, 12:07:19 AM
(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Holloway/Pauluscasino2.jpg)

The thing I am asking if is a camera is at Paulus left elbow, not directly in front of him.  It could be a small video camera even.  Appears to have a wide strap. 

I think it is a prop he used in his ruse along with Joran to play the role of tourist. 

Also recall Anita mentioning her camera at great length.  There is a reason she did that.

Is this her camera and Paulus is using Mommy's camera as a prop to appear to the tourist girls to also be a tourist as we know Joran claimed to be?

Just another of those strange coincidents it is now appearing we will never have answers for.

.

yes, a strap of some kind




Robots,

Again, you are my hero as evidently you are the only other one who can see it!

 :smt058

Yes, it has a wide black strap like something that tacky Anita would stick on her camera she was whining about the police taking. 

.

i saw it immediately  :cool:

Hi Robots,  How Funny, but what I see is what I think looks like a glass of beer sitting on the table that probably belongs to the guy in the gray shirt sitting this side of Paulus.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 09, 2007, 12:07:48 AM
Too big to be a cell phone and shaped oddly for one, too chunky.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 09, 2007, 12:09:30 AM
Wow; so that new prosecutor actually said that they (meaning he and his associates, I take it) promised the suspects that they wouldn't prosecute the case after the end of this year!  Big incentive for them to talk; I mean, really, he had to be aware of their previous incarcerations and their ability to keep quiet.  I hate to admit this, but this latest farce appears to have been nothing more than a choreographed act to try to appease prospective tourists prior to their closing the case.  I really hope that they find that they've not only underestimated prospective tourists, but enraged them with these blatent insults to intelligence.  Wow.


"Hans Mos told The Associated Press Friday he will drop the case unless prosecutors agree before the New Year that they have strong enough evidence to go to court."

Isn't it just sickening!

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 09, 2007, 12:11:21 AM
Could even be a small videocam.IMO

Yep it looks like a camera to me.  Looks a lot like my camera/video cam, small screen viewer.

He's trying to look like a tourist to the girls.

Gives new meaning to the term dirty old man.

Anita must have seen the video and knew to blather on about the police taking HER camera.  Denial.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Puzzler on December 09, 2007, 12:12:26 AM
Could even be a small videocam.IMO

Yep it looks like a camera to me.  Looks a lot like my camera/video cam, small screen viewer.

He's trying to look like a tourist to the girls.

Gives new meaning to the term dirty old man.

Anita must have seen the video and knew to blather on about the police taking HER camera.  Denial.

.


Dirty Hands...



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 09, 2007, 12:14:09 AM
Dutch wear wedding rings on their right hands for some reason. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: amanda on December 09, 2007, 12:14:31 AM
Yes, Anna, it is sickening; the whole situation is sickening and insulting.  I think that I read that, not only did he tell the AP he'd drop the case if he didn't have enough evidence, but that he had "promised the suspects" that he wouldn't prosecute after December 31 (like they haven't really always known that). 

I hate to make a personal attack on anyone's appearance, but what's that Joe T. wearing?  Was he chased out of this country for dressing funny?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 09, 2007, 12:15:18 AM
Camcorder???


(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/CasinoCameraCamcorder.jpg)

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/41PESCGF19L.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: amanda on December 09, 2007, 12:16:05 AM
Perhaps Anita's (lack of) fashion sense is rubbing off on him.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 09, 2007, 12:16:43 AM
How did ABC get that casino video?  I can't remember.

We never found out but heard that Posner wasn't happy about it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: amanda on December 09, 2007, 12:17:08 AM
That does look like a camcorder.  Since when are any types of cameras allowed into casinos?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 09, 2007, 12:17:41 AM
Maybe Freddie wasn't the photographer after all.

 :shock:

Your own father!

.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: amanda on December 09, 2007, 12:18:23 AM
Is that another law/rule that the Van der Sloots are allowed to break?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 09, 2007, 12:20:54 AM
Dutch wear wedding rings on their right hands for some reason. 


I can remember seeing my Grandmother quilting with her right hand and her wedding rings were on it.  Maybe we can verify with NYC.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 09, 2007, 12:23:59 AM
Camcorder???


(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/CasinoCameraCamcorder.jpg)

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/41PESCGF19L.jpg)


Klaas,
I would suggest you send it to somebody but what's the use?  I don't think it would matter if we had the whole crime on video, nothing going to happen to anybody for it.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Scandi on December 09, 2007, 12:24:03 AM
Crazybabyborg...
I was asked last night:
"Do I believe in Miracles and are we expecting one?"
This was my reply:
I say this with absolute conviction... I do not have enough faith to be an atheist in times like this.  It is examples such as these that remind humanity that people still go out of their way for others. About 2000 years ago there was the perfect example of a loving sacrifice.  So do I expect a miracle?  Perhaps a better question is... what are our expectations of that miracle?

Hi again OceanExploration,  I like your question, and know that miracles happen every day that are way beyond what could ever have seemed possible.  Laci and Connor being washed ashore was one. 

But I think the miracle of finding Natalee and bringing her on home would give all those who loved her some peace.  And it also could also point to who did this to her.  Dr Baden said after all this time her bones would still be intact, and with the remnants of clothing, etc the cage, rope used, etc, all would be clues that would hopefully lead to the final outing of those who did not seek help for her when she needed it the most.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 09, 2007, 12:30:09 AM
Helen? Your avatar is an inspiration and I want everyone to see it! Does this show up a little better?

(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/originals/HB.gif)
http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/originals/HB.gif


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Magnolia on December 09, 2007, 12:35:40 AM
How did ABC get that casino video?  I can't remember.

We never found out but heard that Posner wasn't happy about it.

Thank you, Klaas.  I bet he wasn't happy.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Observer on December 09, 2007, 12:36:47 AM
Could even be a small videocam.IMO

Yep it looks like a camera to me.  Looks a lot like my camera/video cam, small screen viewer.

He's trying to look like a tourist to the girls.

Gives new meaning to the term dirty old man.

Anita must have seen the video and knew to blather on about the police taking HER camera.  Denial.

.

Weird seeing a camera in a casino though..It's a nono here in America  :wink:...Let's say he was filming the young MB girls. Was it for himself or someone else? He owe a debt to a millionaire or is he a sexual deviant like his son?

Since he picked out a porno tape for his son I am convinced this is no ordinary father. He probably even knows what fetish Joran likes and knew all about him preying on young tourist girls. Not exactly sure what fetish that would be since we know of the love affair with Guido and his 7th grade gf :shock: I guess the staff at the HI knew Joran best. They said he liked to prey on the blondes. Is that what he did 20 times before? He make money or was it for himself?

(http://img124.imageshack.us/img124/5839/joranblurredxz8.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Helen Back on December 09, 2007, 12:37:43 AM
Helen? Your avatar is an inspiration and I want everyone to see it! Does this show up a little better?

(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/originals/HB.gif)
http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/originals/HB.gif


Hey,
It came up in a conversation earlier today, and that was the only one I could find.  Klaas kindly fixed it up for me.  But yes, this one is a much better rendition!  Thanks!

PS:  I am the frog!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Observer on December 09, 2007, 12:39:29 AM
Camcorder???


(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/CasinoCameraCamcorder.jpg)
That's what it looks like to me.IMO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on December 09, 2007, 12:39:53 AM
Hi Monkeys, just jumping in for a few. I found this article, not sure if it's been posted or not, Sorry if it has.  It's basically the same thing, just a different source...

Aruba Considers Closing Holloway Case
By DANICA COTO,AP
Posted: 2007-12-08 17:52:07
SAN JUAN, Puerto Rico (Dec. 8) - Aruba's chief prosecutor said he will close the case of missing American teenager Natalee Holloway by the end of the month unless his office finds that there is enough evidence to charge someone with a major crime.

The prosecutor, Hans Mos, said he would not comment about the kind of evidence his office is reviewing but that he does not anticipate finding Holloway's remains and prosecuting a case without them would be "very hard."


Photo Gallery: An Enduring Mystery
 Pedro Famous Diaz, AP Joran van der Sloot, right, with his father Paulus Van Der Sloot, leaves an Aruban jail on Dec. 7, following his release. He had been held in connection with the disappearance of Natalee Holloway.
    1 of 10
"We promised the suspects that after Dec. 31, we will not pursue the case," Mos told The Associated Press Friday. "This investigation should end at a certain point."

Holloway's parents did not return multiple messages left at their homes and on their cell phones.

No one has been formally charged in the investigation, which critics have said was botched in its early stages by Aruban authorities.

The probe has revolved around three suspects: Joran van der Sloot, a 20-year-old Dutch citizen and brothers Deepak Kalpoe, 24, and Satish Kalpoe, 21, from Surinam.

They were the last people known to see Holloway before she vanished on the night of May 30, 2005. All three, who have denied any role in her disappearance, have been arrested several times - the latest arrests coming last month - but released after different judges ruled there was not enough evidence to keep holding them.

Mos told the AP he will drop the case unless prosecutors in his office agree before the New Year that they have strong enough evidence to go to court.

He said he imposed the deadline himself earlier this year because he feels two years is a reasonable amount of time for bringing charges against someone.

Mos said he and the Holloway family feel pursuing a minor charge "doesn't serve a purpose." A person convicted of making a body disappear, for example, would serve only six months in prison, he said.

The search for Holloway spanned more than two years and involved hundreds of volunteers, Aruban soldiers, FBI agents and even Dutch F-16 jets laden with search equipment.

"We have a strong conviction that something happened that night, and that it was a very serious thing," Mos said. "The question is whether we are able to prove it."

He said he does not anticipate ever finding Holloway's remains.

"It's very hard to try a case without a body," he said. "It's not impossible, but you need substantial evidence that somebody was killed."

Authorities have combed sand dunes, drained a pond and dove into the island's clear waters. They have detained people including a disc jockey, a casino croupier, two former hotel security guards and even van der Sloot's father, a judge in training at the time.

False leads have included blond hairs attached to a duct tape found along Aruba's coast, and a bloody mattress later linked to a dead dog.

"The Aruban prosecution is going around in circles," said Joseph Tacopina, one of van der Sloot's attorneys. "They've bumbled this case from the beginning."

In 2005, Aruba's prime minister met with Holloway's mother and said authorities made mistakes at the start of their investigation.

Holloway arrived in Aruba to celebrate her high school graduation. On the last night she was seen alive, the Mountain Brook, Alabama native attended a beach concert featuring Boyz II Men and Lauryn Hill and then ate and danced at Carlos 'N Charlie's bar and restaurant.

She never showed up for her return flight, and police found her passport in her hotel room with her packed bags.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Frank on December 09, 2007, 12:41:40 AM
As difficult as it is, looking at Paulus is necessary. An international incident over these 3 punks? When does that happen.

All roads go through Paulus van der sloot. We have been distracted.

He has the most to lose. Joran could have raped 100 woman and as a minor been out and still young.

For Paulus, it's life or death.

He is suspect #1 and I think we should devote all our energy at him. How much do we really know about him?

I used to think AHATA was paying for Tacopina but now it's someone else, I'm sure of it.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Helen Back on December 09, 2007, 12:42:04 AM
Could even be a small videocam.IMO

Yep it looks like a camera to me.  Looks a lot like my camera/video cam, small screen viewer.

He's trying to look like a tourist to the girls.

Gives new meaning to the term dirty old man.

Anita must have seen the video and knew to blather on about the police taking HER camera.  Denial.

.

Weird seeing a camera in a casino though..It's a nono here in America  :wink:...Let's say he was filming the young MB girls. Was it for himself or someone else? He owe a debt to a millionaire or is he a sexual deviant like his son?

Since he picked out a porno tape for his son I am convinced this is no ordinary father. He probably even knows what fetish Joran likes and knew all about him preying on young tourist girls. Not exactly sure what they would be since we know of the love affair with Guido and his 7th grade gf :shock: I guess the staff at the HI knew Joran best. They said he liked to prey on the blondes. Is that what he did 20 times before? He make money or was it for himself?

(http://img124.imageshack.us/img124/5839/joranblurredxz8.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)

Now that Anna spotted the camera, and the image is cleared up, it really does appear that it is sitting on the table filming Natalee and her friends.  WTF?



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 09, 2007, 12:43:18 AM
I believed Hans Mos.  I would have trusted that man to buy a used car from him!  Then he does this to Beth.  That was bad enough but he seems to have returned from his vacation saying he is "ending the investigation" and not just releasing J2K from suspect status.

They all seem to go to The Netherlands and return with a sort of attitude adjustment.  Maybe it's my imagination but seems Karin Janssen also did that as well as van der Straaten.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Observer on December 09, 2007, 12:50:03 AM
As difficult as it is, looking at Paulus is necessary. An international incident over these 3 punks? When does that happen.

All roads go through Paulus van der sloot. We have been distracted.

He has the most to lose. Joran could have raped 100 woman and as a minor been out and still young.

For Paulus, it's life or death.

He is suspect #1 and I think we should devote all our energy at him. How much do we really know about him?

I used to think AHATA was paying for Tacopina but now it's someone else, I'm sure of it.



I agree Frank and I think most everyone agrees that PVDS is up to his eyeballs in this. He is obviously being protected and no one seems to be talking about it or doing anything about it in the Investigation.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 09, 2007, 12:54:02 AM
The attorney on Greta that said he lived in the Carribean has stayed with me. He was one of the panel and said that Judges in the Carribean are not like those in the US. He said that they are NOT more conservative than our juries and that they jealously protect the judiciary. He went on to say that they would never, ever convict without solid evidence.

I've thought about that and I think therein lies some of the answers to why crime and corruption is so rampant in that part of the world. A judge has absolute and sole authority to decide the outcome of any case. That would make corruption so much easier!

I think when Paulus said, "No Body, No Case", he knew exactly what he was talking about. Add to that his friendship and working relationships with the system and this case was a foregone conclusion without a body. It's easier to see in hindsight, and they had a lot of help with corrupt officials, but even at trial, had it gone there, Paulus is right: No Body, No Case.

What a hellhole the place is.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Observer on December 09, 2007, 12:54:40 AM

Now that Anna spotted the camera, and the image is cleared up, it really does appear that it is sitting on the table filming Natalee and her friends.  WTF?



He has the pit boss or casino employee standing right next to him. That would be absolutely unbelievable if that camera was filming at the table.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 09, 2007, 12:56:10 AM
Yes, Paulus, if that is in fact Paulus, has the viewfinder out on the camera as though filming the MB girls.

But I am sure Julia has three hotel workers and a taxi driver who will swear that's a toaster or something!

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 09, 2007, 12:56:20 AM
I sent the photos to Red so he can forward to Beth and Jossy.  That's all we can do and hope that maybe Jossy or JQK make some noise about it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: GabbyG on December 09, 2007, 12:57:00 AM
ACKKKKKKKKKKKKKK IS PAULUS's FLY UNZIPPED!! :shock:


hahahahaha   Yep!! wow is all I can say  LOL  These two people are something else!! Her with her see through blouse, and him with his fly open, both in pictures being seen around the world. 
Looks like another "Ooops" moment to me   LMAO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on December 09, 2007, 12:58:05 AM
Our only hope now lies with the search team finding her body. Our prayers need to concentrate on them now...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: IBE on December 09, 2007, 12:59:15 AM
Camcorder???


(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/CasinoCameraCamcorder.jpg)

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/41PESCGF19L.jpg)


Klaas,
I would suggest you send it to somebody but what's the use?  I don't think it would matter if we had the whole crime on video, nothing going to happen to anybody for it.

.

Well,  If Joran was telling the girls incl. Natalee he was a tourist from Holland and then told them this was his father, wouldn't his father have to play the role of a tourist... ie: a camera?


IMO if Aruba closes this case and the FBI can step in and extradite Joran and others, then perhaps this is why they are hiring Joe T... posturing for a shadow of a doubt if it would go to a jury here.

What has happened in the last day sure doesn't help tourism to Aruba. The coverage that Mos got over Thanksgiving and that weekend went into more homes of people whom before weren't interested but now are.

What a horrible PR for Aruba and the Dutch let alone being cruel to Natalee's family! IMO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 09, 2007, 01:00:15 AM
Our only hope now lies with the search team finding her body. Our prayers need to concentrate on them now...

Yes it does Dihannah! Mrs. Red suggested that we do more than a 24 hour prayer vigil, and I'm certainly up for that! I think we may be waiting to see when the search starts.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 09, 2007, 01:00:15 AM
I sent the photos to Red so he can forward to Beth and Jossy.  That's all we can do and hope that maybe Jossy or JQK make some noise about it.

Even if it's not Paulus, HA!, you'd think someone would have noticed and protested a bit what with all those crack, another HA!, investigators looking at all these things.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on December 09, 2007, 01:04:22 AM
Our only hope now lies with the search team finding her body. Our prayers need to concentrate on them now...

Yes it does Dihannah! Mrs. Red suggested that we do more than a 24 hour prayer vigil, and I'm certainly up for that! I think we may be waiting to see when the search starts.

Yes, and you know you can count me in! Need to pray for there safety right now ;)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Magnolia on December 09, 2007, 01:08:28 AM
Maybe Freddie wasn't the photographer after all.

 :shock:

Your own father!

.



Were charges ever filed against Freddie for the video with the underage
and unconscious girls?  Guess that is not a crime either.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 09, 2007, 01:08:53 AM
http://www.amigoe.com/artman/publish/artikel_37679.php

I'm not going to post the entire thing, just the last paragraph.  Now we know why someone leaked the false information about Joran flying to the USA.  It was to throw the American media off:


According to rumours in the media of of the ditch yesterday evening the plane to the United States will have taken. This made the journalists on from its presence on airport Reina Beatrix. Nothing is less where. Joran were there its American lawyer do escort. Joran remain provisionally still ordinary on Aruba.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: mishy on December 09, 2007, 01:11:59 AM
Our only hope now lies with the search team finding her body. Our prayers need to concentrate on them now...

Yes it does Dihannah! Mrs. Red suggested that we do more than a 24 hour prayer vigil, and I'm certainly up for that! I think we may be waiting to see when the search starts.

Excellent idea...I'm up for it as well...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 09, 2007, 01:14:00 AM
Goodnight guys! I'm fighting getting sick and am going to try to rest hoping to prevent or lessen the onset. Have a great night. Look at Helen's avatar often: it has the right sentiments, and remember there's a ship with BIG HEARTED, HONEST, ETHICAL, COMPETANT people headed to Aruba with bringing Natalee home on their minds! Godspeed and God Bless!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on December 09, 2007, 01:15:30 AM
Goodnight guys! I'm fighting getting sick and am going to try to rest hoping to prevent or lessen the onset. Have a great night. Look at Helen's avatar often: it has the right sentiments, and remember there's a ship with BIG HEARTED, HONEST, ETHICAL, COMPETANT people headed to Aruba with bringing Natalee home on their minds! Godspeed and God Bless!

Nite CBB!  Sweet dreams and hope you feel better!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 09, 2007, 01:17:23 AM
Nite CBB - hope you feel better.  Have some chicken soup!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: IBE on December 09, 2007, 01:18:09 AM
Am pages behind in reading...

yes, Europeans wear their wedding bands on the right hand.

And count me in for the prayer vigil.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 09, 2007, 01:23:27 AM
Posted tonight at BFN:

Did anyone notice what DutchDad said:

Hans Mos : no surprise JvdS was realeased , he had expected this to happen.
But also he said : do not think it is over yet ,nothing changes for me, the investigation will continue , I do not give up.
And he stated : the Kalpoe's were to make a statement after their release. They did not show up. That tells me I'm on the right track.

It doesn't sound like it is over to me.

DutchDad, it helps if we can know where you get information that you post here from. Thanks.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Helen Back on December 09, 2007, 01:25:10 AM
http://www.amigoe.com/artman/publish/artikel_37679.php

I'm not going to post the entire thing, just the last paragraph.  Now we know why someone leaked the false information about Joran flying to the USA.  It was to throw the American media off:


According to rumours in the media of of the ditch yesterday evening the plane to the United States will have taken. This made the journalists on from its presence on airport Reina Beatrix. Nothing is less where. Joran were there its American lawyer do escort. Joran remain provisionally still ordinary on Aruba.

What a surprise!  It's an old, familiar routine.  Same one they played on Beth and Dave and friends when they were there looking for Natalee.  Very clever the old "bait and switch" and no one has it down better than ALE, RenHo, and the lost ones.

Truly, if Joran's not in jail, I don't give a rat's ass where he is.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 09, 2007, 01:29:14 AM
Posted at RU the Amigoe article translated:

iquitos Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2007 1:22 am   
Joran is not repeat not on his way to US

"In the US they would have offed me"

http://www.amigoe.com/artman/publish/artikel_37679.php

‘In de VS zouden ze me afmaken’
8 Dec, 2007, 17:54 (GMT -04:00)

[picture] Joran, inmiddels geschoren, genietend van zijn vrijheid op weg naar de supermarkt.

Joran, shaven, enjoying his freedom on the way to the supermarket.

ORANJESTAD — Beide advocaten hadden verzekerd dat Joran van der Sloot na dagenlange, eenzame opsluiting absoluut geen woord met de media wilde wisselen. Vooral zijn ouders zijn uiteraard bezorgd. Een paar uur na zijn vrijlating is hij toch bereid om vrijdagmiddag een eerste reactie te geven als hij met zijn jongere broer door een stortbui terugloopt van een supermarkt in de regio Noord naar het ouderlijk huis een paar honderd meter verderop. In de supermarkt hadden mensen al gefluisterd: “Hij is terug”, “Wat staat hij door”, en “Het is zo’n aardige familie”. Van der Sloot reageert beleefd in het Papiaments als iemand hem iets vraagt. Bezorgd lijkt hij niet om de straat over te gaan. “In de Verenigde Staten zouden ze me wel afmaken, denk ik.”

Both lawyers assured that after days of solitary confinement he did not want to talk to the press. Is parents are particularly worried. A couple hours after his release he was prepared friday afternoon to give a first reaction as he walked back (in a shoving match?) from the supermarket in Noord to his family home. In the supermarket the people whispered "He is back! and it is such a nice family. Van der Sloot reacts politely in Papiamento if somebody asks him something. He does not seem worried to be on the street. "In the US they would off me, I think."

door Raul Henriquez

De 20-jarige jongen die nog steeds op de verdachtenlijst van Justitie staat, is duidelijk nog niet over het avontuur van de laatste dagen heen. Vijftien dagen heeft hij, voornamelijk geïsoleerd, vastgezeten. “Ik zat in een cel waar wel vijftien man in konden, maar ik zat alleen. Ik mocht een beetje voetballen en kreeg inderdaad de Bijbel. Liever had ik contact met anderen gehad.”

The 20 year old young man who is still on the suspect list is clearly not over his adventure of the last days. For 15 days he was isloated and confined. "I sat in a cell for 15 people, but alone. I could play a little football and had the bible. I would have preferred contact with others."


De verhoren met de rechercheurs vond hij zwaar. “Niet dat ze me constant lastigvielen, maar op vaste tijdstippen werd ik lang ondervraagd. Ik had gewoon niets tegen ze te zeggen, had alles ooit al gezegd en heb tot het laatste moment gezwegen.”


He found the questioning from the detectives hard (heavy). Not that they constantly bothered me, but on a regular schedule i was questioned for long periods. I had nothing to say to them and had already told them everything they asked and was silent until the end.

De aanhouding in zijn kamer in Arnhem was een complete verrassing. Joran van der Sloot was van plan naar Amsterdam te verhuizen vanwege zijn studielocatie. Hij was niet van plan om voor de kerst naar Aruba te gaan. “Ik dacht echt dat alles voorbij was. Misschien dat ik later nog zou worden opgeroepen voor een afsluitend gesprek hier, dat had ik verwacht. Maar dat ik zo werd aangehouden in Nederland, had ik niet gedacht. Bleek dat ze hier niets nieuws hadden. Ik begrijp nog steeds niet wat ze wilden.”

The arrest from his room in Arnhem was a complete surprise. He was planning to move to Amsterdam due to a change in his study location. He was not planning to come to Aruba for Christmas. "I really though that everything had passed. Maybe I would be called in later for a final conversation, that is what I expected. But that I was arrested in Holland i n that way i did not imagine. It seemed they had something new. I still don't understand what they wanted."


Van der Sloot baalt ervan dat hij een deel van zijn studie heeft moeten missen. Graag wil hij gauw terug. Hoe lang hij blijft, weet hij nog niet zeker. “Ik blijf nog even bij mijn ouders. En Aruba blijft ondanks alles een fijne plek. Zo meteen neem ik eerst een duik in het zwembad.”

Van der Sloot complained about having to miss his studies. He wants to go back soon. How long he will stay, he still doesn't know. "I will stay a bit more with my parents. And Aruba is a fine place despite everything. In a while I will take my first dip in the pool."

Op Aruba zal hij geen contact opnemen met de broers Deepak en Satish Kalpoe die een paar dagen eerder vrijkwamen. De vriendschap lijkt ‘al jaren’ bekoeld. Nog een effect van de zaak, beaamt Joran van der Sloot.


In Aruba he won't make contact with the Kalpoe brothers Deepak and Satish who were released a few days earlier. The friendship is already years cooled off. Another effect of the case, says Joran.


Volgens geruchten in de media zou Van der Sloot gisteravond het vliegtuig naar de Verenigde Staten hebben genomen. Dit maakten de journalisten op uit zijn aanwezigheid op luchthaven Reina Beatrix. Niets is minder waar. Joran was daar om zijn Amerikaanse advocaat uitgeleide te doen. Joran blijft voorlopig nog gewoon op Aruba.

According to rumors in the media Joran left last night for the US. The journalists made that up out of his presence at the airport. Nothing is less true. Joran was there to see off his US lawyer. He will remain on Aruba for the time being.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Observer on December 09, 2007, 01:32:57 AM
Yeah I didn't think the Kalpoes would do a press conference to announce there innocence..lol



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: GabbyG on December 09, 2007, 01:33:50 AM
It would have been awful if we went all the way to Aruba to find out the side scan sonar and ROV was incapable of the tasks we require.  The sea trials served to both get the gear working on board the Persistence and to prove their adequacy. If you think it would be interesting, I could post a sample of the sea trial data. The side scan sonar data is fantastic.

Hi Ocean!! Welcome to SM!! yess, please do post that data, it would be SO interesting!!
It is SUCH an honor to have you posting here at SM, thank you for visiting with us, and many Thanks to you, the Persistence and crew for your selfless undertaking of this mission to bring our girl Natalee home where she belongs! I agree with the other posters that you all are doing God's work and rest assured that He is making the trip with you, and guiding the path of the Persistence. I feel humbled to be able to actually be "speaking" with you, and it has done my heart much good to be reminded that there is still a lot of good in this scary world, evidenced by the supporters and crew of the Persistence who made this mission possible by volunteering the time, knowledge, finances, the ship, equipment etc. in order to search for Natalee and hopefully bring her home at last. We realize the sacrifices all of you are making and the chances you are taking. The world is watching, and our prayers are with all of you for your safety and success.
Thanks for taking the time to keep us updated, and sharing with us Ocean. Stop by and visit us often!
God Speed!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Scandi on December 09, 2007, 01:34:40 AM
Our only hope now lies with the search team finding her body. Our prayers need to concentrate on them now...

Yes it does Dihannah! Mrs. Red suggested that we do more than a 24 hour prayer vigil, and I'm certainly up for that! I think we may be waiting to see when the search starts.

I agree CBB and Dihannah, and for this I would take part in a prayer vigil.  It is a wonderful idea I think because every positive thought from everyone, no matter where they are, counts.  I'm realizing what a huge job this ship and crew have ahead of them, as it will be them against the sea.  Every prayer will simply send positive thoughts for their safety and of course the miracle we all want to take place.  YaYa


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Observer on December 09, 2007, 01:39:00 AM
SAN JUAN, Puerto Rico (AP) The clock is ticking for officials to find concrete evidence in Natalee Holloway's disappearance.

Aruba's chief prosecutor says he plans to close the case by the end of the month unless his office finds enough evidence to charge someone with a major crime.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Scandi on December 09, 2007, 01:42:27 AM
It would have been awful if we went all the way to Aruba to find out the side scan sonar and ROV was incapable of the tasks we require.  The sea trials served to both get the gear working on board the Persistence and to prove their adequacy. If you think it would be interesting, I could post a sample of the sea trial data. The side scan sonar data is fantastic.

Hi Ocean!! Welcome to SM!! yess, please do post that data, it would be SO interesting!!
It is SUCH an honor to have you posting here at SM, thank you for visiting with us, and many Thanks to you, the Persistence and crew for your selfless undertaking of this mission to bring our girl Natalee home where she belongs! I agree with the other posters that you all are doing God's work and rest assured that He is making the trip with you, and guiding the path of the Persistence. I feel humbled to be able to actually be "speaking" with you, and it has done my heart much good to be reminded that there is still a lot of good in this scary world, evidenced by the supporters and crew of the Persistence who made this mission possible by volunteering the time, knowledge, finances, the ship, equipment etc. in order to search for Natalee and hopefully bring her home at last. We realize the sacrifices all of you are making and the chances you are taking. The world is watching, and our prayers are with all of you for your safety and success.
Thanks for taking the time to keep us updated, and sharing with us Ocean. Stop by and visit us often!
God Speed!!

Hi GabbyG,  Great to see you <<Wavy Guy>>    This will be  a real learning experience to really in essence go through the search with them as it is going on.  What a neat and unexpected bit of fortune to come our way.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Scandi on December 09, 2007, 01:46:19 AM
SAN JUAN, Puerto Rico (AP) The clock is ticking for officials to find concrete evidence in Natalee Holloway's disappearance.

Aruba's chief prosecutor says he plans to close the case by the end of the month unless his office finds enough evidence to charge someone with a major crime.

Wouldn't it be just great karma ******* if this search finds something of Natalee.  Under the wire, ya baby, that would make everyone sit up and clear their throats!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 09, 2007, 01:49:01 AM
This site link was posted this morning by Nuts44x4.  It is very good and discusses various aspects very briefly with regard to the rules and Treaty for extradition with The Netherlands.

It is against their constitution to extradite a Dutch National.  So I don't think this is going to happen.

How ironic that THIS is against the law yet drugging and raping tourists isn't.

Excellent article at that site and before we get too excited about extradition or conducting investigations, think we need to read the entirely of this short article and apply where applicable.


Goodnight!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Helen Back on December 09, 2007, 01:51:34 AM
It's late for me.  Goodnight all.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 09, 2007, 01:58:14 AM
Nite Helen and anyone else leaving for the nite.

I'm calling it a night myself!  GOODNIGHT ALL!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Observer on December 09, 2007, 02:00:58 AM
SAN JUAN, Puerto Rico (AP) The clock is ticking for officials to find concrete evidence in Natalee Holloway's disappearance.

Aruba's chief prosecutor says he plans to close the case by the end of the month unless his office finds enough evidence to charge someone with a major crime.

Wouldn't it be just great karma ******* if this search finds something of Natalee.  Under the wire, ya baby, that would make everyone sit up and clear their throats!

Yes it would. After reading these articles today its about all we have to be hopeful for. The Dutch have had this case since aug 2006..Not sure what more they are waiting on at this point :(

http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5g03xmlbMM0BjGFGrLokyvroCO6FwD8TDEK0O0
http://blog.al.com/spotnews/2007/12/suspects_release_no_surprise_t.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Scandi on December 09, 2007, 02:05:14 AM
SAN JUAN, Puerto Rico (AP) The clock is ticking for officials to find concrete evidence in Natalee Holloway's disappearance.

Aruba's chief prosecutor says he plans to close the case by the end of the month unless his office finds enough evidence to charge someone with a major crime.

Wouldn't it be just great karma ******* if this search finds something of Natalee.  Under the wire, ya baby, that would make everyone sit up and clear their throats!

Yes it would. After reading these articles today its about all we have to be hopeful for. The Dutch have had this case since aug 2006..Not sure what more they are waiting on at this point :(

http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5g03xmlbMM0BjGFGrLokyvroCO6FwD8TDEK0O0

I agree *******.  Night Klass and Helen.  I'm going to wind my way to bed as well, but see you guys tomorrow.  Night to you too Anna and Gabby  ;}


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: GabbyG on December 09, 2007, 02:37:51 AM
It would have been awful if we went all the way to Aruba to find out the side scan sonar and ROV was incapable of the tasks we require.  The sea trials served to both get the gear working on board the Persistence and to prove their adequacy. If you think it would be interesting, I could post a sample of the sea trial data. The side scan sonar data is fantastic.

Hi Ocean!! Welcome to SM!! yess, please do post that data, it would be SO interesting!!
It is SUCH an honor to have you posting here at SM, thank you for visiting with us, and many Thanks to you, the Persistence and crew for your selfless undertaking of this mission to bring our girl Natalee home where she belongs! I agree with the other posters that you all are doing God's work and rest assured that He is making the trip with you, and guiding the path of the Persistence. I feel humbled to be able to actually be "speaking" with you, and it has done my heart much good to be reminded that there is still a lot of good in this scary world, evidenced by the supporters and crew of the Persistence who made this mission possible by volunteering the time, knowledge, finances, the ship, equipment etc. in order to search for Natalee and hopefully bring her home at last. We realize the sacrifices all of you are making and the chances you are taking. The world is watching, and our prayers are with all of you for your safety and success.
Thanks for taking the time to keep us updated, and sharing with us Ocean. Stop by and visit us often!
God Speed!!

Hi GabbyG,  Great to see you <<Wavy Guy>>    This will be  a real learning experience to really in essence go through the search with them as it is going on.  What a neat and unexpected bit of fortune to come our way.

Hey Scandi, hi there!!  Great to see you!  Yess, I am very excited about OceanEx sharing the info and experiences of their trip on the Persistence. Some exciting times ahead!
Time to sign off, nite Scandi, nite Monkeys!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Kiwi on December 09, 2007, 02:50:50 AM
*******- I have an idea that may work with regards to taking the case to trial.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on December 09, 2007, 02:51:54 AM
Bad sleep night here.  :(


Carpe I see you on. email me when you can.. TY
 My prayers  to the folks on the boat... Prayers to Nats family
I am do damn behind cause of work it sucks..  :(



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Observer on December 09, 2007, 02:52:55 AM
"They've bumbled this case from the beginning."

Just amazes me both JQK and Tacopina can say this. Why don't they name names..Like Paul Van Der Sloots best friend Jan Van Der Straaten bumbled the case. He was so incompetent in Natalee's investigation but he took over as Bonaires Chief of Police? Yeh Ok!!

How many times have they talked about or looked into this crooked fat slob? Mr How much money do you have? The guy that changed the statements,tore up confessions,intimidated witnesses and was in charge of all the physical evidence.

(http://i198.photobucket.com/albums/aa118/Observer00000007/jacobs1.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Observer on December 09, 2007, 02:54:11 AM
*******- I have an idea that may work with regards to taking the case to trial.

Whats your idea?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on December 09, 2007, 02:56:03 AM
"They've bumbled this case from the beginning."

Just amazes me both JQK and Tacopina can say this. Why don't they name names..Like Paul Van Der Sloots best friend Jan Van Der Straaten bumbled the case. He was so incompetent in Natalee's investigation but he took over as Bonaires Chief of Police? Yeh Ok!!

How many times have they talked about or looked into this crooked fat slob? Mr How much money do you have? The guy that changed the statements,tore up confessions,intimidated witnesses and was in charge of all the physical evidence.

(http://i198.photobucket.com/albums/aa118/Observer00000007/jacobs1.jpg)


 Big Fat POS  Fat F**K..    :-x :-x :-x


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Kiwi on December 09, 2007, 02:58:08 AM
Mos wanted to separate everyone in order to get them to talk.  If he only prosecutes the 2K's and not Joran at this time he may have the pressure he needs to get them to talk.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Observer on December 09, 2007, 03:14:39 AM
Mos wanted to separate everyone in order to get them to talk.  If he only prosecutes the 2K's and not Joran at this time he may have the pressure he needs to get them to talk.
Not a bad idea but I have no idea if they can do that and he said today they wont have a trial to persue lesser crimes..He gave a example like making a body dissapear is only 6 months in jail time. They just don't seem to want to use anything to there advantage like Crowne Witness,bending the rules or investigating the people that intentionally bumbled the case. They just want to close the case.IMO

I find it hard to believe that he won't even attempt to get the truth in the court of law. Or even go after the sexual assault charges that dompig is on tape saying right now he could get Joran for 8 years on sexual assault.

http://tinyurl.com/3yxgr6


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Kiwi on December 09, 2007, 03:22:48 AM
It's a shame that they don't have law enforcement down there. This would probably make 2K's mad enough to not go down alone. Especially, if they had limited involvement.  Of course if they are equally guilty, Joran may speak up and want equal punishments. It would nice to see the lawyers turn on each other, for the good of their clients.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Kiwi on December 09, 2007, 03:45:31 AM
Time to call it a night. Good night to who ever is left.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: sirensong on December 09, 2007, 04:12:23 AM
They have no evidence because the powers that be in the first few months got rid of it.  What about the Dutch looking in to that corruption.  They just may find the evidence they need.  Call Dompig in for questioning and ask him why he changed his story five times about what happened to her.  Round them all up and see if the ALE that were taking PV's from witnesses can tell us what Van der stratten did and how he helped his friends.  Mos, go see why Witt and Vocking changed the search warrant when Witt was supposed to have been somewhere else.  Take PV's on all the people that found evidence, then the ones that got rid of it.  You don't have a case because you haven't pushed past the corruption. Don't believe what these lying officials say.  Reinterogate all of the Koens, Freddie, lorenzo etc.  Where were the sloot children, home or with Anita.  What did that truck bring to the sloot house.  What was on Anita's and Freddies cameras.  Why do they let all the criminals go free without ever having to be interogated again. You needed to go after this case not taking into account anything the Arubans did.  Half the time no one knows if it is police or beach patrol.  Look at the mess down there and take 2 minutes to figure ou why they need you to keep giving them more money.  It will get worse, because if we don't get answers, we are going to do  our  best to keep people away from Aruba, and hurt any dutch company we can.  This whole thing is just BS and it's time to know the truth.  What ever  happened to interpol being involved.  Tell us when our FBI can come in and  get answers.  Interogat  Karen Janse, why did she  release  Paul as a suspect, when she knew damn well he was.  Ask her where the evidence went that  changed form before  it  got there.   She personally carried evidence herself.  Where is it.    Not good  enough  Mos, this is ridiculous.  No wonder the  school of  boys  who raped and recorded the school girl had no fear.  This attitude is encouraged by the dutch.  Ridiculous, cruel, corrupt, liars,  perverts and  preditors-thats  what  I think of when Aruba is mentioned.    And lots of money coming from somewhere to cover all these mistakes, as well as defend them.  I hope many people involved in Aruba and some of the Dutch judges fall right into the ocean.  Then they could meet Natalee and be ashamed.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: MisGivings on December 09, 2007, 05:07:02 AM
ACKKKKKKKKKKKKKK IS PAULUS's FLY UNZIPPED!! :shock:

Why does he have a forensic scientist??


IT IS!!!!  In that top photo, Paulus' fly is unzipped!  GROOOSSS!


And it looks like he is more than excited about the decision.

Reporter; Paulus, how do you feel about this recent turn of events, and your son's pending release from detention?
Paulus; Words escape me, but I am highly aroused that my son will be free to find me another naive tourist to make disappear.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 09, 2007, 05:47:26 AM
Where's Robots?   Joe T. has man boobs!

take a look at the body language in that picture.....


Big Bellies-R-Us?

well that too.... but there was something else that stood out to me right away... Look at how they are all standing..


and ANNA and Tyler, Red said he would be sooooo disappointed if the two of you didn't post on the FP about today's article... :wink: :lol:

Very good article.   I read it and tried twice to respond to no avail.  I got server or page error.  I have not watched NBC or MSNBC in a long, long time and have no plans to view them again.  Ronald Reagan must be turning over in his grave --- remember how he got started in TV -- GE Theatre.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 09, 2007, 08:10:37 AM
Dutch wear wedding rings on their right hands for some reason. 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wedding_ring
In The Netherlands, Catholic people wear it on the left, all others on the right

In a few European countries people wear their wedding bands on the left hand but the majority wear them on their right hands. In the Netherlands Catholics wear their rings on the left while others wear them on the right.
http://www.answerbag.com/q_view/46046


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 09, 2007, 08:48:17 AM
SAN JUAN, Puerto Rico (AP) The clock is ticking for officials to find concrete evidence in Natalee Holloway's disappearance.

Aruba's chief prosecutor says he plans to close the case by the end of the month unless his office finds enough evidence to charge someone with a major crime.

I went shopping yesterday.  Well, not really shopping but trying to get an order on chairs straight where I was delivered the wrong chairs, but ... beside the point, I kept my radio on public radio and they announced every few minutes the case according to Mos, would most likely be closed by 12/31/07, secondary to lack of evidence.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on December 09, 2007, 09:52:09 AM
Quote from: KarmaRoundUp on Today at 06:11:40 PM
Art Wood
'Rita Cosby Live & Direct'
December 1, 2005

ART WOOD, FORMER SECRET SERVICE AGENT: Absolutely. Absolutely. There's a lot that Americans can do through the State Department. I want to remind everybody that Natalee Holloway was a U.S. citizen. Once the Aruban authorities are done investigating this case, the FBI can still conduct an investigation.

I would like to know,once and for all,IF this is true.
Hi Monkeys

Klaas:
I would like to know too.  I'm affraid if we ask 3 different people we'll get 3 different answers.
 :gaah:
Got stuck on the last thread.I hear you Klaas.
 :smt102


Art Wood
DANA PRETZER
July 2, 2006 - Part 1
July 8, 2006 - Part 2

http://sundaynightsatellite.libsyn.com/index.php?post_year=2006&post_month=07

Art:

The family of Natalee needs to put pressure on the US attorney in Birmingham to push the FBI to conduct an investigation after ALE close the case. We have a treaty that allows the FBI to pursue a violation of civil rights of an american citizen there.
Thanks Janet.

Karma ... I have save a copy of the treaty and related provision reference somewhere in a file on my disorganized desktop files.   :)

I am off now but ... will attempt to find it tomorrow afternoon and ... post accordingly

Have nice evening Monkeys.

Janet

4:20 PM

Karma ... I found it!

Janet

+++++++++++++


“IT AIN’T OVER UNTIL IT IS OVER.”

Art Wood
'Rita Cosby Live & Direct'
December 2, 2005


ART WOOD, FORMER SECRET SERVICE AGENT: Absolutely. Absolutely. There's a lot that Americans can do through the State Department. I want to remind everybody that Natalee Holloway was a U.S. citizen. Once the Aruban authorities are done investigating this case, the FBI can still conduct an investigation, and they could extradite these suspects to the United States. Let me point out that there's a ton of circumstantial evidence in this case to convict these kids.


http://www.internationalextradition.com/netherlands_bi.htm
When the FBI Seeks Extradition
BILATERAL EXTRADITION TREATIES
NETHERLANDS


<snipped>

SCHEDULE OF OFFENSES

1. Murder; assault with intent to commit murder.

2. Manslaughter.

3. Malicious wounding; inflicting grievous bodily harm.

4. Arson.

5. Rape; indecent assault; incest; bigamy.

6. Unlawful sexual acts with or upon children under the age specified by the laws of both the Requesting and Requested States.

7. Wilful abandonment of a minor or other dependent person when the life of that minor or that dependent person is or is likely to be injured or endangered.

8. Kidnapping; abduction; false imprisonment.

9. Robbery; burglary; larceny; embezzlement.

10. Fraud, including obtaining property, money or valuable securities by false pretenses, deceit, falsehood, or other fraudulent means.

11. Bribery, including soliciting, offering [*27] and accepting.

12. Extortion.

13. Receiving, possessing or transporting anything of value knowing it to have been unlawfully obtained.

14. Offenses relating to criminal breach of trust.

15. An offense against the laws relating to counterfeiting and forgery; including the forging of seals, trademarks, documents, or use of such forgeries.

16. An offense against the laws relating to international transfers of funds.

17. An offense against the laws relating to importation, exportation or transit of goods, articles, or merchandise, including violations of the customs laws.

18. Offenses relating to slavery or the illegal transporting of persons.

19. Offenses against the laws relating to bankruptcy.

20. Offenses against the laws relating to prohibition of private monopoly or unfair trade practices.

21. Perjury; subornation of perjury; making a false statement to a government agency or official.

22. Offenses relating to wilful evasion of taxes and duties.

23. Any act or omission intended or likely to: (a) endanger the safety of an aircraft in flight or of any person on board such aircraft; or (b) destroy or render any aircraft incapable of flight.

24. Any unlawful seizure or exercise of control [*28] of an aircraft in flight by force or violence, or by threat of force or violence, or by any other form of intimidation.

25. Any unlawful act or omission intended or that is likely to endanger the safety of any person in a railway train or in any vessel or other means of transportation.

26. Piracy, mutiny, or any mutinous act committed on board a vessel.

27. Malicious damage to property.

28. Offenses against the laws relating to the traffic in, or the possession, production or manufacture of narcotic drugs, cannabis, psychotropic drugs, cocaine and its derivatives, and other dangerous drugs and chemicals.

29. Offenses against laws relating to the poisonous chemicals or substances injurious to health.

30. Offenses against the laws relating to firearms, ammunition, explosives, incendiary devices or nuclear materials.

31. Offenses against the laws relating to the abuse of official authority.

32. Offenses against the laws relating to obstruction of justice.

33. Offenses relating to securities and commodities.

34. Facilitating or permitting the escape of a person from custody.

35. Incitements to violence.

36. Any other act for which extradition may be granted in accordance with the laws [*29] of both Contracting Parties.

_______
Good morning Monkeys.
Thank you Janet,sure seems like a lot of good info,a lot to digest.I am wondering if Beth and Dave have looked into all of this.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 09, 2007, 09:54:56 AM
snipped from Klaas's post of Joran's statement after release...
"I sat in a cell for 15 people, but alone. I could play a little football and had the bible."

He forgot to mention his cell phone :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on December 09, 2007, 10:00:24 AM
It would have been awful if we went all the way to Aruba to find out the side scan sonar and ROV was incapable of the tasks we require.  The sea trials served to both get the gear working on board the Persistence and to prove their adequacy. If you think it would be interesting, I could post a sample of the sea trial data. The side scan sonar data is fantastic.

I think it's all fascinating..Even more so because on this expedition you are looking for Natalee. I observed some of the pics and it's amazing how small the crab cage would look. I guess thats where the ROV will come into play and great to hear that it has been working perfect.

In recent years there have been other missing americans who have dissapeared without a trace under suspicious circumstances. They may have been also buried off the coast of Aruba. You search may have others worried in Aruba that are not involved in Natalee's dissapearance.
I agree,no telling how many bodies the Persistence might find.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: robots on December 09, 2007, 10:15:48 AM
(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Holloway/Pauluscasino2.jpg)

The thing I am asking if is a camera is at Paulus left elbow, not directly in front of him.  It could be a small video camera even.  Appears to have a wide strap. 

I think it is a prop he used in his ruse along with Joran to play the role of tourist. 

Also recall Anita mentioning her camera at great length.  There is a reason she did that.

Is this her camera and Paulus is using Mommy's camera as a prop to appear to the tourist girls to also be a tourist as we know Joran claimed to be?

Just another of those strange coincidents it is now appearing we will never have answers for.

.

yes, a strap of some kind




Robots,

Again, you are my hero as evidently you are the only other one who can see it!

 :smt058

Yes, it has a wide black strap like something that tacky Anita would stick on her camera she was whining about the police taking. 

.

i saw it immediately  :cool:

Hi Robots,  How Funny, but what I see is what I think looks like a glass of beer sitting on the table that probably belongs to the guy in the gray shirt sitting this side of Paulus.

hiya scandi, anything is possible
i wish we had the whole tape


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: robots on December 09, 2007, 10:23:25 AM
Yes, Paulus, if that is in fact Paulus, has the viewfinder out on the camera as though filming the MB girls.

But I am sure Julia has three hotel workers and a taxi driver who will swear that's a toaster or something!

.



 :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: NYC_lover on December 09, 2007, 10:30:46 AM
Dutch wear wedding rings on their right hands for some reason. 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wedding_ring
In The Netherlands, Catholic people wear it on the left, all others on the right

In a few European countries people wear their wedding bands on the left hand but the majority wear them on their right hands. In the Netherlands Catholics wear their rings on the left while others wear them on the right.
http://www.answerbag.com/q_view/46046

Yes, this is correct.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 09, 2007, 10:34:46 AM
Morning monkeys.  Why is it so hard for me to do a search here?  All I ever get is something about no matches found. 

Could someone tell me where that list of PV's that Klaas has refined from Grande's list is located?  TIA

MuminOhio I am working on something for you.  You have gotten mine and another very smart monkey's attention.  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on December 09, 2007, 10:40:10 AM
(http://img129.imageshack.us/img129/8895/capta87b92480ed84807b7dgx3.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)
Paulus van der Sloot, forensic scientist Michael Archer, Anita van der Sloot and attorney Joseph Tacopina are seen early Friday, Dec. 7, 2007, before the release of Joran van der Sloot, in Oranjestad, Aruba. A judge in Aruba ordered the release Friday of the last of three suspects re-arrested last month in the disappearance of American teenager Natalee Holloway, ruling the evidence was not strong enough to continue holding him.
---------------------------------
(http://img510.imageshack.us/img510/4848/capt6aa55ae3cc974d8bb45jf5.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)
Anita van der Sloot, left, reacts as her attorney Rosemarie Arnold givers her the news of the release of her son Joran van der Sloot, Friday, Dec. 7, 2007, in Oranjestad, Aruba. A judge in Aruba ordered the release Friday of the last of three suspects re-arrested last month in the disappearance of American teenager Natalee Holloway, ruling the evidence was not strong enough to continue holding him

Paulus - beyond words

Taco - every picture I've ever seen him in he's standing with his legs wide apart and looks like he's getting ready to jump at something - maybe he thinks he looks macho...I think he looks weird.

He really is disgusting.

Joe T. looks like he is trying to keep away from Anita.  He has that look on his face like oh god please don't touch me I just took a shower.

Anita is just horrendous.
How disgusting!Jeeeezzzz,put some underpants on man or at least don't pull your shorts up to your man boobs! :smt065


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 09, 2007, 10:41:27 AM
Morning monkeys.  Why is it so hard for me to do a search here?  All I ever get is something about no matches found. 

Could someone tell me where that list of PV's that Klaas has refined from Grande's list is located?  TIA

MuminOhio I am working on something for you.  You have gotten mine and another very smart monkey's attention.  :wink:

This one is a bit more complete than Grandes:

http://homepage.mac.com/mcgraw.kalpoe.docs/Statements_timeline.htm


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Blakerin on December 09, 2007, 10:44:35 AM
snipped from Klaas's post of Joran's statement after release...
"I sat in a cell for 15 people, but alone. I could play a little football and had the bible."

He forgot to mention his cell phone :wink:

Joran's Bible is The Aruban edited edition,  The Commandment "Thou shalt not kill" has been omitted.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 09, 2007, 10:50:00 AM
Thanks Klaas.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: robots on December 09, 2007, 10:57:23 AM
I'm tore down, I'm almost level with the ground.

BUT, im better now

thats how i felt a couple days ago, i feel much better today
cant explain it, something good will happen
 :cool:



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 09, 2007, 11:05:59 AM
I don't know how everyone else feels, but I think this attitude of not pursuing lesser charges is a real can of shit-o. OJ wasn't convicted in the criminal trial, and Nicole's and Ron's family were not witnesses to true "justice" for what he did, but I vividly remember an interview with her sister, Denise, just after the civil trial and she said that it was the first thing that had eased the pain just a little for her family. In a court of law they had been able to secure a finding of guilt for OJ in connection with Nicole's death. It was an official stamp of what the family knew to be true.

She said that after the criminal trial, there was a maddening sense that he had been washed totally clean from the murders. He could truthfully say there had been an exhaustive investigation and it had cleared him. The civil finding took that away if nothing else.

I think that Beth and Dave deserve the same. If the 3 are convicted of body disposal, rape, kidnapping, whatever.........they have been officially connected to a crime committed against their daughter. And 3 or six months in jail is far better than 3 or 6 months on the street. IMO.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 09, 2007, 11:08:37 AM
From Satish's PV of June 13:

After we drove the route we went back to Bubali. I called my brother Deepak to pick me up. When he picked me up we went straight to the racket club, near Marriot. My brother told me we were going to Joran. He is an intern at the club. In front of the entrance of the club the 3 of us met and talked. We talked about what happened. Joran told him the police called him to take him to drive the route. We told him which route we drove so he knew where to go. We spoke for about 15 minutes. We did not speak long because the police was on its way to pick up Joran. After that we drove straight home. At home my brother and I finished our sister´s home work. It had to be finished the next day. As we were busy my brother got a phone call from Joran. My brother told me we had to go to Joran´s later on. After we finished our sister´s work we went to Joran. I drove the car to his house.


Remember the K2 have just finished offering the HI lie as the latest story of what happened.  What does the "intern at the club" mean?  Joran was an intern at the racket club?  Did he have a key to the place as a result? He was working there at the time?  The police were going there to pick him up?  Why after all of this at the police station did Joran call them?  Why in the heck are they doing their sister's work? Where was the sister? 

I think I have missed something about Joran working at the racket club...I always thought he just played tennis there...if he actually worked there...the bag and shoes become more interesting.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: robots on December 09, 2007, 11:10:28 AM


lost battles are not the same as losing the war

ask any soldier they will tell you about "battles"

we just got pushed off the mountain,

we are SIMPLY - REGROUPING

 :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 09, 2007, 11:17:12 AM
I'm tore down, I'm almost level with the ground.

BUT, im better now

thats how i felt a couple days ago, i feel much better today
cant explain it, something good will happen
 :cool:



Don't feel that way.  You have been my hope and shining light in my time of depression.  When I have been so discouraged and felt so sad...I cam here and asked where you were.  We have needed you to keep our spirits up.  You made me believe that mankind still has the ability to make good happen in this evil world.  Without your positive attitude I think I would have given up months ago. 

The monkeys have the answers..they are all here in the 2 years worth of work we have done.  You have helped me to keep thinking and asking the questions.  If the case is closed to Aruban prosecution we can't let it slide off the radar.  A life was extinguished because too many people turned a blind eye and looked the other way.  That is how evil gets a foothold and then it's even more difficult to stop.  Thanks to you I know that it is possible to stop...we just have to have faith that someone will find a link...a tiny little tidbit of something...that will spark ideas and thoughts into actions. 

Robots, without you and your courageous in your face comments to Aruba and all involved I would never have had the courage to carry on.   


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: robots on December 09, 2007, 11:19:17 AM
I'm tore down, I'm almost level with the ground.

BUT, im better now

thats how i felt a couple days ago, i feel much better today
cant explain it, something good will happen
 :cool:



Don't feel that way.  You have been my hope and shining light in my time of depression.  When I have been so discouraged and felt so sad...I cam here and asked where you were.  We have needed you to keep our spirits up.  You made me believe that mankind still has the ability to make good happen in this evil world.  Without your positive attitude I think I would have given up months ago. 

The monkeys have the answers..they are all here in the 2 years worth of work we have done.  You have helped me to keep thinking and asking the questions.  If the case is closed to Aruban prosecution we can't let it slide off the radar.  A life was extinguished because too many people turned a blind eye and looked the other way.  That is how evil gets a foothold and then it's even more difficult to stop.  Thanks to you I know that it is possible to stop...we just have to have faith that someone will find a link...a tiny little tidbit of something...that will spark ideas and thoughts into actions. 

Robots, without you and your courageous in your face comments to Aruba and all involved I would never have had the courage to carry on.   

 :wink: :smt052
im feeling better

:)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 09, 2007, 11:22:50 AM
NYC,

Can you confirm for me that the Dutch do not ever extradite Dutch nationals and that it is a violation of their basic Constitution to do so?

Would they not have to be tried in The Netherlands under any and all circumstances?

I do not want anyone to get the false hope that anyone, least of all a minor when crime committed, is ever going to be handed over by the Dutch to stand trial in a foreign country.  Never happen.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 09, 2007, 11:38:26 AM
Dutch wear wedding rings on their right hands for some reason. 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wedding_ring
In The Netherlands, Catholic people wear it on the left, all others on the right

In a few European countries people wear their wedding bands on the left hand but the majority wear them on their right hands. In the Netherlands Catholics wear their rings on the left while others wear them on the right.
http://www.answerbag.com/q_view/46046

Yes, this is correct.


Of course......I would prefer that Paulus be wearing that same wedding band around his neck   :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 09, 2007, 11:48:56 AM
NYC,

Can you confirm for me that the Dutch do not ever extradite Dutch nationals and that it is a violation of their basic Constitution to do so?

Would they not have to be tried in The Netherlands under any and all circumstances?

I do not want anyone to get the false hope that anyone, least of all a minor when crime committed, is ever going to be handed over by the Dutch to stand trial in a foreign country.  Never happen.

.

Once you get that confirmation, remember the post by our 'Blue Moon of KY' a few days ago..........

"Why when Joran was told any questioning in the future would occur in the NL and then ARUBA had him picked up and sent back there--why was this?  Maybe the influence could not be put on the Dutch and control would have been lost if all this occured in the NL.  I think Aruba overrode the NL to bring him back to Aruba for questioning so they could be in control of the outcome. Mos maybe was side tracked by all this.  I hope he has learned his lesson now."


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 09, 2007, 11:50:38 AM


lost battles are not the same as losing the war

ask any soldier they will tell you about "battles"

we just got pushed off the mountain,

we are SIMPLY - REGROUPING

 :cool:

Robots? There have been a few times when I came to the forum to find your headlines and my heart would stop because I thought I had missed something huge. After reading a bit, I would realize that you were being your eternal optimistic self, and I wanted to choke and hug you at the same time.  :lol:

DON'T YOU GO ANYWHERE, AND DON'T FAIL US NOW, YOU OVERGROWN LIZARD OF HOPE! I agree with you, something good is going to happen and because you are here puffing that cigar, I don't feel foolish or alone in my feelings.

It's little things, but I couldn't help but look at those pics of Anita and Paulus and compare them to recent pics of Beth. Beth has been through the fires of Hell and has emerged purified. She has her priorities straight from the pain and knows from where to seek comfort. Paulus and Anita show the wear and scorch marks and I don't think they have emerged from whatever depths they descended. There's some sort of promise in that, that mere humans cannot control outcomes and fashion fate. I'm glad of that.

I believe something good will happen, and you and I are going to celebrate it together.  :wink:

And Lala's is going to write us in her little book when we do, 'cause she's going to be right here as well!  :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 09, 2007, 11:54:31 AM
The Dutch are holding and refuse to extradite a suspect in the 9/11 attack on this country.  I am not sure he is even a Dutch national. 

Remember the words from Paulus the first night Beth arrived:

You have no jurisdiction!


We can't get them to extradite for crimes committed here where we do have jurisdiction.  They just refuse to do it no matter what we say as we have seen with this terrorist.  Even France cooperated far better than the Dutch in this regard.

They don't respect our system.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: NYC_lover on December 09, 2007, 11:54:43 AM
NYC,

Can you confirm for me that the Dutch do not ever extradite Dutch nationals and that it is a violation of their basic Constitution to do so?

Would they not have to be tried in The Netherlands under any and all circumstances?

I do not want anyone to get the false hope that anyone, least of all a minor when crime committed, is ever going to be handed over by the Dutch to stand trial in a foreign country.  Never happen.

.

Not sure about your question but maybe this is an answer on your question.

Extradition
The Netherlands has extradition with another country. The Netherlands authoriteits can come along work entirely for an extradition. I have no idea about the extradition law and (International) law. I am sure, when someone get an extradition request to another country, where the Netherlands has an extradition with. The person has need a International lawyer. Because in the another country where this person has something has done, there is another law.
But in the Holloway case, Aruba is Dutch territory and there is Dutch law. Then there is no International lawyer need.
Only an extradition because Aruba is not the Netherlands. They have just many things look like on the Netherlands, only in Aruba there is much better weather.
But again about extradition, I think everyone can get a extradition when he or she becomes suspicious of involvement at an illegal offence. I think also when someone is under the 18. Of course must the Netherlands, with the concerning country an extradition request have.

I hope u get something new from this. It becomes time for, there more in will deepen for me.
When there is anything else, please ask again!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: dennisintn on December 09, 2007, 11:57:18 AM

The Dutch do not extradite Dutch Nationals.  It is against their Constitution.

Therefore, any Dutch citizen is always going to be going before one of those famous Dutch judges who never met a suspect they didn't like.

Now isn't THAT special!

.

this was not an extradition from holland to another country. remember their big excuse for letting jvds go to holland in 2005, was because holland and the islands are all one big country, and jvds could be called in at any time for anything a.l.e. needed.  turned out they were wrong about just being able to ask them to come in and talk.  paulus is just twisting people and actions to suit his needs of controlling natalee's case.  moving jvds from holland to aruba isn't much more involved than transfering a prisoner from one jail to another in the same town.  that's what we were lead to believe anyway.
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 09, 2007, 12:01:50 PM

The Dutch do not extradite Dutch Nationals.  It is against their Constitution.

Therefore, any Dutch citizen is always going to be going before one of those famous Dutch judges who never met a suspect they didn't like.

Now isn't THAT special!

.

this was not an extradition from holland to another country. remember their big excuse for letting jvds go to holland in 2005, was because holland and the islands are all one big country, and jvds could be called in at any time for anything a.l.e. needed.  turned out they were wrong about just being able to ask them to come in and talk.  paulus is just twisting people and actions to suit his needs of controlling natalee's case.  moving jvds from holland to aruba isn't much more involved than transfering a prisoner from one jail to another in the same town.  that's what we were lead to believe anyway.
dennisintn


Yes, I agree Dennis but I am afraid some harbor the hope that because of various treaties in place, there is even a slim hope for extradition to this country, the U.S., because of a civil rights violation of our citizen.  Not within the Dutch system but to stand trial under U.S. laws.  I am just saying this won't happen and we should not get hopes up for it only to have them dashed again.


Note:

Article 8 deals with the extradition of nationals. It contains two provisions similar to those included in some of our other recently signed extradition treaties. It grants the Executive Authority the discretionary power to extradite its own nationals. If extradition is denied on the basis of nationality, the requested Party undertakes to submit the case to its competent authorities for the purpose of prosecution, provided that Party has jurisdiction over the offense. This article thus takes into account the law of the Netherlands ordinarily prohibiting the extradition of Dutch nationals but allowing for their prosecution in the Netherlands for offenses committed abroad.

Article 8 also contains an innovation. It provides that the requested Party may not refuse extradition solely on the basis of nationality where there exists a treaty between the Parties on the execution of foreign penal sanctions. Such agreements, more often referred to as prisoner transfer treaties, would, for example, allow a Dutch national tried and convicted in the United States to return to the Netherlands to serve out his ordered term of incarceration. [*7] This provision was put in Article 8 to provide for liberalization of the nationality clause should the Parties in the future conclude such an agreement.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: NYC_lover on December 09, 2007, 12:02:01 PM
The Dutch are holding and refuse to extradite a suspect in the 9/11 attack on this country.  I am not sure he is even a Dutch national. 

Remember the words from Paulus the first night Beth arrived:

You have no jurisdiction!


We can't get them to extradite for crimes committed here where we do have jurisdiction.  They just refuse to do it no matter what we say as we have seen with this terrorist.  Even France cooperated far better than the Dutch in this regard.

They don't respect our system.

.

I think this is really true: They don't respect our system.
But it law systeem, I hate this so great.

There was a men in Suriname. He has killed his father. Was never go to the jail in Suriname, and lives free here in the Netherlands.
And 10 times councils where he works? He works by the Dutch Government in The Hague.
Very high corruption in the Netherlands!!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: dennisintn on December 09, 2007, 12:03:31 PM


Reporter; Paulus, how do you feel about this recent turn of events, and your son's pending release from detention?
Paulus; Words escape me, but I am highly aroused that my son will be free to find me another naive tourist to make disappear.
[/quote]

this would be extremely funny except that it might be true.
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: NYC_lover on December 09, 2007, 12:04:40 PM

Of course......I would prefer that Paulus be wearing that same wedding band around his neck   :cool:

Ok, no idea about the wearing neckless. IMO has nothing to do with the Catholics.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 09, 2007, 12:09:36 PM
NYC,

Thank you.  I have read this is the case and that other members of the European Union are concerned but they just can't do much with the Dutch to bring them in line with the other countries who are members of the EU.

We Dutch can be stubborn, can't we?  Any reform will have to come from within or it will not happen is what I think for Dutch will never be forced to do much of anything.  They have to get tired of it and make the changes themselves or they would make any reforms just not work one way or another. 

Also have read many things about Dutch judges being corrupt.  These days, a system that operates in secret is going to have this I am afraid.  More open courts might prevent some of this, I don't know.  But all human beings are capable of corruption and wrong doing.  It helps to hold them to public scrutiny in my opinion.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Blue Moon on December 09, 2007, 12:10:48 PM

The Dutch do not extradite Dutch Nationals.  It is against their Constitution.

Therefore, any Dutch citizen is always going to be going before one of those famous Dutch judges who never met a suspect they didn't like.

Now isn't THAT special!

.

this was not an extradition from holland to another country. remember their big excuse for letting jvds go to holland in 2005, was because holland and the islands are all one big country, and jvds could be called in at any time for anything a.l.e. needed.  turned out they were wrong about just being able to ask them to come in and talk.  paulus is just twisting people and actions to suit his needs of controlling natalee's case.  moving jvds from holland to aruba isn't much more involved than transfering a prisoner from one jail to another in the same town.  that's what we were lead to believe anyway.
dennisintn

Remember, Jorans Dutch lawyer did not fight the extradition back to Aruba.  Remember Quido's (is this spelled right?) lawyer did and he was not sent back.  Joran was better off being sent back to Aruba for his protection by his father and judges. Guido was not best served being sent back to Aruba.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: NYC_lover on December 09, 2007, 12:16:07 PM
NYC,

Thank you.  I have read this is the case and that other members of the European Union are concerned but they just can't do much with the Dutch to bring them in line with the other countries who are members of the EU.

We Dutch can be stubborn, can't we?  Any reform will have to come from within or it will not happen is what I think for Dutch will never be forced to do much of anything.  They have to get tired of it and make the changes themselves or they would make any reforms just not work one way or another. 

Also have read many things about Dutch judges being corrupt.  These days, a system that operates in secret is going to have this I am afraid.  More open courts might prevent some of this, I don't know.  But all human beings are capable of corruption and wrong doing.  It helps to hold them to public scrutiny in my opinion.

.

Oh yeah Dutch people can be stubborn, I am very much time stubborn and then I get a big brawl in the house. And tell my parents I do what I want to do.  :wink: Not really good for me, because I must listing to my parents and take them advise, because they are older.

What is this, These days, a system that operates in secret is going to have this I am afraid.
Where is a operates in secret? Please, tell me more about it, maybe I don't have heard this.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: NYC_lover on December 09, 2007, 12:23:37 PM

Remember, Jorans Dutch lawyer did not fight the extradition back to Aruba.  Remember Quido's (is this spelled right?) lawyer did and he was not sent back.  Joran was better off being sent back to Aruba for his protection by his father and judges. Guido was not best served being sent back to Aruba.

Blue Moon of KY - there is no fight for stop the extradition to Aruba. Because they are Dutch KLPD are involved in the research.
And I early wrote Aruba is almost the Netherlands.
With Guido his arrested was something else doing on, he just get only few questions without dention.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Blue Moon on December 09, 2007, 12:38:19 PM

Remember, Jorans Dutch lawyer did not fight the extradition back to Aruba.  Remember Quido's (is this spelled right?) lawyer did and he was not sent back.  Joran was better off being sent back to Aruba for his protection by his father and judges. Guido was not best served being sent back to Aruba.

Blue Moon of KY - there is no fight for stop the extradition to Aruba. Because they are Dutch KLPD are involved in the research.
And I early wrote Aruba is almost the Netherlands.
With Guido his arrested was something else doing on, he just get only few questions without dention.

Thanks NYC. You are always a help to us.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: NYC_lover on December 09, 2007, 12:42:25 PM
Thanks NYC. You are always a help to us.

You are welcome Blue Moon of KY!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Silverfox on December 09, 2007, 12:47:49 PM
Investigate the Judges and their brotherhood (and teflon shield).

We all know there is major corruption going on... The judges seems to be a good place to start...

Investigate also the Aruban government at the Minister level... Since Paulus is an apostle of Rudy Croes then it makes sense that the "brotherhood" has deep roots.

Investigate the "Posner" effect ... the brotherhood must get it's funding from somewhere...

If they want the focus off the JK2 then lets re-set the fire where it needs to be -- on discovering who is calling the shots and isolating the masterminds... They believe they are above the law since they are the ones who make the law...

Noriega thought he was above the law too... Now he rots in a U.S. Prison.  IF we can capture a head of state then surely we can capture despots at minister and judicial and polis levels who grow corruption for their own gain...

In the end this may be the only solution...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 09, 2007, 12:49:21 PM
NYC,

Thank you.  I have read this is the case and that other members of the European Union are concerned but they just can't do much with the Dutch to bring them in line with the other countries who are members of the EU.

We Dutch can be stubborn, can't we?  Any reform will have to come from within or it will not happen is what I think for Dutch will never be forced to do much of anything.  They have to get tired of it and make the changes themselves or they would make any reforms just not work one way or another. 

Also have read many things about Dutch judges being corrupt.  These days, a system that operates in secret is going to have this I am afraid.  More open courts might prevent some of this, I don't know.  But all human beings are capable of corruption and wrong doing.  It helps to hold them to public scrutiny in my opinion.

.

Oh yeah Dutch people can be stubborn, I am very much time stubborn and then I get a big brawl in the house. And tell my parents I do what I want to do.  :wink: Not really good for me, because I must listing to my parents and take them advise, because they are older.

What is this, These days, a system that operates in secret is going to have this I am afraid.
Where is a operates in secret? Please, tell me more about it, maybe I don't have heard this.

I'm Dutch-American and stubborn as well, NYC.  At least we know we are, haha, unlike some who don't recognize it.

By operates in secret, I refer to the manner in which Dutch court is conducted.  We have many cases broadcast on TV in live time in this country so to us it seems very secretive that no one is allowed in the courtroom from the press for example during the trials and hearings before judges.  It is required to be public in this country except for juveniles.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Silverfox on December 09, 2007, 12:50:55 PM
Investigate the Judges and their brotherhood (and teflon shield).

We all know there is major corruption going on... The judges seems to be a good place to start...

Investigate also the Aruban government at the Minister level... Since Paulus is an apostle of Rudy Croes then it makes sense that the "brotherhood" has deep roots.

Investigate the "Posner" effect ... the brotherhood must get it's funding from somewhere...

If they want the focus off the JK2 then lets re-set the fire where it needs to be -- on discovering who is calling the shots and isolating the masterminds... They believe they are above the law since they are the ones who make the law...

Noriega thought he was above the law too... Now he rots in a U.S. Prison.  IF we can capture a head of state then surely we can capture despots at minister and judicial and polis levels who grow corruption for their own gain...

In the end this may be the only solution...

btw... take a good look at the Posner cases that Smid has been involved with and you will get my drift...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 09, 2007, 12:54:49 PM
With all that has been going on of late, I have to wonder why in the world the vd Sloots and their evil cadre are all over the newspapers, preening and posing, pants unzipped, see through paraphernalia and all and generally seen as celebrating as though they are so happy that this young girl is still missing.

Is this not the height of callous behavior and poor taste?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: robots on December 09, 2007, 12:55:13 PM
the situation here is tragic

one of these days, the people involved in this corruption are going to mess with the wrong person(s)

im anxiously awaiting that day, and in particular i am waiting for paulus and joran
to step on the wrong toes of someone that will solve the "NON ANSWERING of questions with the TRUTHFUL answers  once and for all"

that day is coming



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: NYC_lover on December 09, 2007, 12:57:01 PM
I'm Dutch-American and stubborn as well, NYC.  At least we know we are, haha, unlike some who don't recognize it.

By operates in secret, I refer to the manner in which Dutch court is conducted.  We have many cases broadcast on TV in live time in this country so to us it seems very secretive that no one is allowed in the courtroom from the press for example during the trials and hearings before judges.  It is required to be public in this country except for juveniles.

.

Are u 50%, 25%, 12,5% or 6,25% Dutch? Unlike some who don't recognize it. Lol.... But not only Dutch people been this.  :wink:
Ah, I understand about the operates in secret. That is many time in the Netherlands. It depends on the process. When its a great process, OM and judges don't want media or people in the court. No idea, or that is stipulated legally.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Buckeye on December 09, 2007, 01:00:13 PM
Lalas

I have always remembered Satish's intern statement.  That's why I have no problem with the "beach" story.  There was a road that went to the beach.  If Joran wanted to dropped at the beach, he would have been dropped at the beach, not North of Marriott.  They needed to account for possibly being seen on that road, especially with the gardener witness.  I just wonder if the Racket  Club had a white pick up (that the fisherman could have seen).  They all hung out there.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 09, 2007, 01:01:07 PM
I'm Dutch-American and stubborn as well, NYC.  At least we know we are, haha, unlike some who don't recognize it.

By operates in secret, I refer to the manner in which Dutch court is conducted.  We have many cases broadcast on TV in live time in this country so to us it seems very secretive that no one is allowed in the courtroom from the press for example during the trials and hearings before judges.  It is required to be public in this country except for juveniles.

.

Are u 50%, 25%, 12,5% or 6,25% Dutch? Unlike some who don't recognize it. Lol.... But not only Dutch people been this.  :wink:
Ah, I understand about the operates in secret. That is many time in the Netherlands. It depends on the process. When its a great process, OM and judges don't want media or people in the court. No idea, or that is stipulated legally.


80% with 20% Scots-Irish just to give me a temper from the Irish, lol.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 09, 2007, 01:03:18 PM
the situation here is tragic

one of these days, the people involved in this corruption are going to mess with the wrong person(s)

im anxiously awaiting that day, and in particular i am waiting for paulus and joran
to step on the wrong toes of someone that will solve the "NON ANSWERING of questions with the TRUTHFUL answers  once and for all"

that day is coming




You are right Robots that justice will not be denied forever in this.

I don't know how or where it will come from but it will be served.  That's the natural order of things, anyway.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Magnolia on December 09, 2007, 01:04:49 PM
Mos came out with guns ablazin'.

He said that he has Explosive new evidence.
He said that he had proof that Natalee was dead.
He said that the father was definately involved.
He was willing to talk.
He gave us all hope and made us believe in him. (except San)

What happened to him?  Who got to him?
Just before the Kalpoes were released he suddenly canceled
a news conference and his next interview he blamed the
family, the media and the DEA agent. He was suddenly
like a different man.

Where is the explosive new evidence? 
How did he know that the Kalpoes disposed of the body?

It is all goofy!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: NYC_lover on December 09, 2007, 01:08:03 PM
80% with 20% Scots-Irish just to give me a temper from the Irish, lol.

.

Cool almost full Dutch...lol..and Scots-Irish...good temper tosame....lol..
What I have heard, few people have Scots-Irish blood in them or are familiar with this country. And live in the US.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 09, 2007, 01:09:36 PM
Mos came out with guns ablazin'.

He said that he has Explosive new evidence.
He said that he had proof that Natalee was dead.
He said that the father was definitely involved.
He was willing to talk.
He gave us all hope and made us believe in him. (except San)

What happened to him?  Who got to him?
Just before the Kalpoes were released he suddenly canceled
a news conference and his next interview he blamed the
family, the media and the DEA agent. He was suddenly
like a different man.

Where is the explosive new evidence? 
How did he know that the Kalpoes disposed of the body?

It is all goofy!



You are so right!  I remain stunned by this and don't know what in the world to think now.

It's even gone from releasing the suspects to closing the investigation entirely.

Talking now as though Natalee just died from non-violence maybe in Joran's presence and the Kalpoe Body Disposal Unit just did a sort of unconventional internment of some sort or other that would require only minutes be served in jail so why bother with that trivial detail.

Every time he speaks of late, this becomes less and less a crime and less serious.

And yet nothing has really changed.  Natalee is still missing and her parents do not know what happened to her after she got in the car with the suspects.

Mind boggling!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: NYC_lover on December 09, 2007, 01:11:04 PM
Sorry monkey friends, I have to go for dinnertime.
I am not sure which time I come back, because I want watch the Woman World Cup Skiing in Aspen, Colorado.
And after that Peter R. De Vries.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: dennisintn on December 09, 2007, 01:15:03 PM

The Dutch do not extradite Dutch Nationals.  It is against their Constitution.

Therefore, any Dutch citizen is always going to be going before one of those famous Dutch judges who never met a suspect they didn't like.

Now isn't THAT special!

.

this was not an extradition from holland to another country. remember their big excuse for letting jvds go to holland in 2005, was because holland and the islands are all one big country, and jvds could be called in at any time for anything a.l.e. needed.  turned out they were wrong about just being able to ask them to come in and talk.  paulus is just twisting people and actions to suit his needs of controlling natalee's case.  moving jvds from holland to aruba isn't much more involved than transfering a prisoner from one jail to another in the same town.  that's what we were lead to believe anyway.
dennisintn

Remember, Jorans Dutch lawyer did not fight the extradition back to Aruba.  Remember Quido's (is this spelled right?) lawyer did and he was not sent back.  Joran was better off being sent back to Aruba for his protection by his father and judges. Guido was not best served being sent back to Aruba.

i can't remember this minute, and don't have time to look, but i don't think guido was under the envelope of suspect when he was arrested in holland, and i think there were other differences in the circumstances of the two men also.
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: dennisintn on December 09, 2007, 01:17:12 PM

nyclover.  did you hear peter devries say anything about natalee's case?
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Puzzler on December 09, 2007, 01:19:30 PM
With all that has been going on of late, I have to wonder why in the world the vd Sloots and their evil cadre are all over the newspapers, preening and posing, pants unzipped, see through paraphernalia and all and generally seen as celebrating as though they are so happy that this young girl is still missing.

Is this not the height of callous behavior and poor taste?

Hee hee hee....I bet Taco ha NO IDEA his little picture would turn out!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Puzzler on December 09, 2007, 01:21:54 PM
the situation here is tragic

one of these days, the people involved in this corruption are going to mess with the wrong person(s)

im anxiously awaiting that day, and in particular i am waiting for paulus and joran
to step on the wrong toes of someone that will solve the "NON ANSWERING of questions with the TRUTHFUL answers  once and for all"

that day is coming



Same thing I've been thinking for the past few days...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 09, 2007, 01:26:49 PM
O/T Pages are loading so slowly for me I can't stand it any longer.

Going to drag out the tree and do the thing with that.

If we had all just listened to Carnut, we would still have our trees up from last year and be spared all this re-decorating business!   :lol:



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 09, 2007, 01:29:35 PM
With all that has been going on of late, I have to wonder why in the world the vd Sloots and their evil cadre are all over the newspapers, preening and posing, pants unzipped, see through paraphernalia and all and generally seen as celebrating as though they are so happy that this young girl is still missing.

Is this not the height of callous behavior and poor taste?

Well, Anna, that's one thing no no one would ever accuse the vdS of, having class.  Had they class, would they allow their kids to hang out (with) (without) them in a local gambling casino?  Would they befriend Julia Renfro?  Would Joran have hung out with the PIMPS that he did?  Would he have worn that same checked blue shirt for weeks on end?  Would Anita have gone out in public with a see-thru blouse?  Would Paulus have dared wear pants that were half zipped and s sweaty shirt?  Would they have chosen Joe Tacopino as an attorney and even if they felt it necessary, would they have had their picture made with him for what appeared a social event?

When people with class are on holiday, they can "slum" and still be trendy, but not the inhabitants of said place.  We all do things on holiday out of cultural interests that we might not do each day in our lives, but it appears the Sloots live like they are on holiday.  Of course not many of us even on holiday would wear see-through blouses or wear our pants unzipped.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 09, 2007, 01:32:09 PM
Pages have  been loading slowly for me for a while.  Well, good luck, Anna, with your tree.  I have 3 decorated and I think that is it.  I am through.  I usually try to have more but this body is worn out and moreover my DH says he is not going back to the attic or the storage house another time to get decorations.  :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Puzzler on December 09, 2007, 01:34:35 PM
Mos came out with guns ablazin'.

He said that he has Explosive new evidence.
He said that he had proof that Natalee was dead.
He said that the father was definitely involved.
He was willing to talk.
He gave us all hope and made us believe in him. (except San)

What happened to him?  Who got to him?
Just before the Kalpoes were released he suddenly canceled
a news conference and his next interview he blamed the
family, the media and the DEA agent. He was suddenly
like a different man.

Where is the explosive new evidence? 
How did he know that the Kalpoes disposed of the body?

It is all goofy!



You are so right!  I remain stunned by this and don't know what in the world to think now.

It's even gone from releasing the suspects to closing the investigation entirely.

Talking now as though Natalee just died from non-violence maybe in Joran's presence and the Kalpoe Body Disposal Unit just did a sort of unconventional internment of some sort or other that would require only minutes be served in jail so why bother with that trivial detail.

Every time he speaks of late, this becomes less and less a crime and less serious.

And yet nothing has really changed.  Natalee is still missing and her parents do not know what happened to her after she got in the car with the suspects.

Mind boggling!

I learned a long time ago that when something is "mind boggling" and seems all screwed up - it's because IT IS!  So...this is screwed up.  Means someone got to Mos, big time, or that Mos was putting out a big bluster to hopefully scare one of J2K into talking, or that Mos didn't know how corrupt the judge was and ended up having his on "mind boggling" experience.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 09, 2007, 01:37:09 PM
With all that has been going on of late, I have to wonder why in the world the vd Sloots and their evil cadre are all over the newspapers, preening and posing, pants unzipped, see through paraphernalia and all and generally seen as celebrating as though they are so happy that this young girl is still missing.

Is this not the height of callous behavior and poor taste?


They have no shame nor pride.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Kermit on December 09, 2007, 01:43:23 PM

******* and/or Klassend,

Would you look at that video again.
It looks to me as though he [Paulus] takes a sip from his drink,
It looks like a small pile of chips in front of him
then his right hand picks up chips off the blackjack table and then
he removes his hand from the table and under the table -  when the video goes fuzzy

Why would one remove chips from the table though if that is what I saw?

http://abcnews.go.com/Video/playerIndex?id=3922731&affil=wlne


(http://img236.imageshack.us/img236/9844/paulusincasino2eq5.jpg)
See his hand, watch it.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Magnolia on December 09, 2007, 01:45:34 PM
With all that has been going on of late, I have to wonder why in the world the vd Sloots and their evil cadre are all over the newspapers, preening and posing, pants unzipped, see through paraphernalia and all and generally seen as celebrating as though they are so happy that this young girl is still missing.

Is this not the height of callous behavior and poor taste?


They have no shame nor pride.

Eurotrash?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 09, 2007, 01:50:49 PM
lol...yeah, something like that! :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Kermit on December 09, 2007, 01:51:28 PM
Mos came out with guns ablazin'.

He said that he has Explosive new evidence.
He said that he had proof that Natalee was dead.
He said that the father was definately involved.
He was willing to talk.
He gave us all hope and made us believe in him. (except San)

What happened to him?  Who got to him?
Just before the Kalpoes were released he suddenly canceled
a news conference and his next interview he blamed the
family, the media and the DEA agent. He was suddenly
like a different man.

Where is the explosive new evidence? 
How did he know that the Kalpoes disposed of the body?

It is all goofy!




VAN SUSTEREN: Is there anything new?

TACOPINA: Not for my eyes.

VAN SUSTEREN: Are there new wiretaps?

TACOPINA: There are new recordings.





Hans Mos
ABC NEWS
November 26, 2007

Hans Mos, Aruba's chief prosecutor, told ABC News he believes the the new evidence makes the case against the three men stronger than it was two years.

"We are convinced if we had had this evidence we have now they would not have been released by the court at that time," Mos said.



We Learned Something New In The Natalee Holloway Investigation
by Greta Van Susteren Gretawire.com

CAR WASHING - Greta interviews off camera the neighbor to Kalpoe brothers who saw them washing their car the night
Natalee disappeared.

_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
Tacopino said directly: "the homes were bugged and one of the Kalpoe brothers was taped admitting he had returned later to the beach that night"





MOS: New evidence is evidence that we didn't have before. As simple as that.

new evidence gained after the moment that they were released,

the evidence is just material, but they have to be confronted with that because they were never confronted with those findings.



MOS has stated:
 
we had to confront them with it. They are suspects, each of them, and they are witnesses against the other, possible. So we have to question them.

That's what we are aiming for. And if this information given by them shows that they are not involved, then they will not be prosecuted. But we don't think that that's the case.

We are not desperate.

we cannot disclose it at this time.

It's not just one person taking that decision. We take it as an organization, and meaning (ph) an organization, we (INAUDIBLE) with -- there are 45 people here, and they contribute one way or another in this case,


decision to re-arrest these three suspects was a decision taken by 10 lawyers, by 10 lawyers sitting around a table (INAUDIBLE) whole afternoon, being presented the new material.


The execution of the whole investigation is done by police officers, who were, in this case, after the Dutch were involved, handpicked from the Netherlands






Greta:

So it's physical evidence, something you can actually touch or feel

JQK: Or see. Sure.

Greta: or some scientific thing

JQK: Absolutely

Evidence - JQK

"I can't specifically answer but i think the evidence that they have their hands on now will do a lot to clarify the timeline, the whereabouts, the actions and where everybody was that night and the time it was when they were at certain places and what was going on."


THEN KELLY STATED
The report of significant new incriminating evidence was misleading," Kelly said. "It was the same evidence or lack of evidence they had from the very beginning."
_______________________________________

Dave Holloway: “There is always hope of finding Natalee alive; however, police are saying to look in the sea”
http://tinyurl.com/2yh3b8


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Port Valerie on December 09, 2007, 01:53:34 PM
With all that has been going on of late, I have to wonder why in the world the vd Sloots and their evil cadre are all over the newspapers, preening and posing, pants unzipped, see through paraphernalia and all and generally seen as celebrating as though they are so happy that this young girl is still missing.

Is this not the height of callous behavior and poor taste?

Well, Anna, that's one thing no no one would ever accuse the vdS of, having class.  Had they class, would they allow their kids to hang out (with) (without) them in a local gambling casino?  Would they befriend Julia Renfro?  Would Joran have hung out with the PIMPS that he did?  Would he have worn that same checked blue shirt for weeks on end?  Would Anita have gone out in public with a see-thru blouse?  Would Paulus have dared wear pants that were half zipped and s sweaty shirt?  Would they have chosen Joe Tacopino as an attorney and even if they felt it necessary, would they have had their picture made with him for what appeared a social event?

When people with class are on holiday, they can "slum" and still be trendy, but not the inhabitants of said place.  We all do things on holiday out of cultural interests that we might not do each day in our lives, but it appears the Sloots live like they are on holiday.  Of course not many of us even on holiday would wear see-through blouses or wear our pants unzipped.

I'm in Florida. Men wear "business casual" or "golf casual" instead of suits. It is possible to look very good without wearing a suit and lots of jewelry.

Question: Is everything in Joe T's wardrobe SHINY?

He seems to go from shiny suits in NY to shiny sportswear in the tropics. Topped off with shiny hair.






Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 09, 2007, 01:53:50 PM
Thought I'd bring this over from the front page while it is slow in here.
10061906, a frequent front page poster is leaving us.

10061906 on December 9th, 2007 1:33 pm This is my final posting but I will never let go of Natalee or the fact that Aruba killed her.
Justice was blinded by Aruba.

There are two reasons why Natalee cannot be found.
One: she is alive and being held captive somewhere.
Everything that followas is my opinion based on information that has been released..

Two: Natalee has passed on.
There were injuries to her that forensic evidence would lead to either her abductors or injuries she sustained; so she had to disappear.
It is more difficult to convict someone if there is no body.
If she is alive where is she? She could be any where in the world.
If she is dead where are her remains?
Are they in the Ocean? If she were taken out on a boat then more are dragged into the story.
No: When asked Joran tells us she is not in the sea.
Is she buried near the Fisherman’s Huts? No the ground is too hard to go below at least six feet: a back hoe would be required.
Was she cremated? It is a possible, but then more are dragged into the dirty secret.
So what is available that a body could disappear with the minimum of effort?
A ready made grave or crypt or a hole in the ground like and air shaft to a mine are a few.
From Satish’s statement. “I took it that he meant, if a corpse is found evidence could be found on the corpse that could lead to our arrest”. (some guilt is implied here). Sounds like Paulus knows the Kalpoes are only involved with driving Natalee someplace and is trying to implicate/intimidate them in what happened.
It is more like a threat. I know what happened to Natalee while she was with Joran; I know you guys only drove them around. I will get you attorneys but you have to stick to the story that you dropped Joran and Natalee off at the beach and don’t know anything more”. If not I can make you hang for her murder and burial.
Satish continued.
“This is not the first time that we have dropped young American girls off at their hotels, with we I mean my brother, Joran and I. This means that they have a taxi globe and impersonate a taxi cab.” Each weekend Joran is with us.” But just how many would fit in Deepak’s taxi? Maybe six persons at best.
Maybe only one drugged girl plus the three.
“Deepak and I dropped Joran and the missing girl at the beach north of the Marriot”.
IMO Joran then transferred Natalee into a waiting car or pick up truck and off to another destination.
There is also a reference to bringing a camera to Freddy.
Satish then blames Joran for Natalee’s disappearance.
That is where the K2’s leave the story.
At the time of Natalee’s disappearance; Jaime states that loco Stef is Joran’s girlfriend. However no where in Joran’s book does he mention her.
Joran says that Jaime’s father is never around for Jaime but Jaime says he picks his father up from work every night. Sounds like Joran and Paulus more then Jaime and his father.
Jaime states through Freddy he met Joran. Usually Joran, Freddy, Koen, Sander and me go out together. We go to Carlos and Charlie’s, Bahia, Tandra; etc. He knows Koen and Sander for over a year, plays poker (poke her) with them but does not know their last name.(?)
Sounds like they all had sex with a Natalee but at the time they did not know her last name; if you use “Thoughtprints”.
Joran mentions that Madison is hanging out with her boy friend and that Natalee and Ruth share the same twin bed and describes the room and room number.
Sounds like hidden cameras at the Holiday Inn and Van Cromvoirt could handle that. Perhaps Natalee sleeping with Ruth in his mind constitutes them being lesbians because men would not sleep that close together least they be called gay.
From Deepak’s statement.
“Joran was at that moment in time with a friend of us named Guido in the casino.”
So much for Guido saying he does not know Joran. Guido also hangs out with Andre. Deepak says Guido talks a little funny and may be gay. This was before Guido’s lawyer said that Guido was innocent because he is gay. He was the only one charged with heavy battery. Aruba did not want Guido back for murder; Posner wanted him for skimming the casino with Joran at the black jack tables.
(As an aside why are locals only permitted so many days in the casino. That makes no sense unless they are there money laundering.)
Remember Deepak says that Joran could only win back $100.00 of the $360.00 that was lost either by Ruth or Natalee. Joran says that $100.00 is the best he could do. How does he know that is the best unless that is the amount Guido can loose without arousing suspicion from the pit boss?
I could go on and on; but here are my final thoughts on what happened to Natalee. She was given a roofi by Satish at C and C’s. Remember Natalee, Joran and Satish disappeared for a while and Deepak could not find them. She was told that her friends that left earlier were already at a party and Joran would take her there when C and C closed and then afterwards take her back to the hotel.
The four left C and C’s and headed towards the Lighthouse. On the way they went to a secluded road near the Marriot where Joran helps Natalee out of Deepak’s car. The Kalpoes leave, because there are no girls for them. The friends had left C and C’s earlier then Natalee.
As Deepak pulls away there is a security guard dressed in black. Remember he added that to the story. Geoff could have had his VCB security uniform on and he and Joran placed a drugged and injured Natalee in his pick up.
They then proceed to take Natalee to where they will use her at the party. By this time Natalee realizes she is in trouble but then the roofi kicks in and she falls asleep on the way towards the Lighthouse (MALMOK)(?) Now where is this other party. How about Koen’s house.
Waiting there are Koen, Sander, Freddy, Max Arends Guido some of the local girls and girl friends and look who shows up but Joran’s girlfriend Loco Stef. Natalee enters the party half drugged half drunk. Joran throws her on a bed. Some how she gets Sander’s phone and gets off; “I don’t even know these people”. Of course not she expected to see her girl friends there; but they were back at the hotel.
They take Natalee as she is coming in and out of consciousness from the choke hold administered by Guido. He knows just how to do “Something Dreaming”
While this is on going Freddy is video taping everything.
From Deepak’s email. “We heard a lot of false alarms that she was dead, she was seen with two guys, her hair is cut and is red now.
Who killed Natalee? IMO someone who is just the opposite of Natalee’s blue eyes and blond hair.
Out of jealousy for Joran having sex with Natalee; willingly or not; IMO: Stef cuts Natalee’s hair and maybe stabs her with the scissors or hits her with something.
Her hair is now red from blood stains.
She is loaded in the back of Geoff’s pickup on a mattress from the Gottenbos. Remember there was no inclination that a crime happened there so the Gottenbos home would not be searched. Remember Alexander, Koen’s father would not permit the police to requestion Koen. Sander claims his phone was stolen so he would not have to account for Natalee’s cry for help. The Gottenbos had no plans to but they sure got off the island fast. Remember the wife even had a dress shop. Remember Williem von Cromvoirt also sold his business and left the island. Paulus being in the legal system has no reason to leave because he is untouchable! Some how Van der Straaten sees a dead Natalee; Maybe he was called by Alexander before they took Natalee away.
Geoff and Joran place Natalee in Geoffs pickup and drop Natalee into a mine shaft. They then want to distance themselves from the scene. On the way to Logo Colony and Grapefield Beach they stop in Santa Cruz and Joran calls home. They continue to San Nicolas and get rid of the shirt, glasses, foam and bottle of cleaning fluid. Geoff drops Joran off at school and he sleeps there while Geoff drops off the mattress at Grapefield Beach and returns home to Paradera.
Shortly there after Geoff gets rid of his pickup and has a walk along the beach with another girl from C and C’s. Geoff notices the VCB and when Natalee’s name is mention; he immediately shuts up and takes the girl back to her hotel and leaves.
Basically you have a drugged injured girl; kidnapped and taken to the home of a Dutch Nataional; was raped and may have been mutilated by a jealous girlfriend and her body disposed of down a mine shaft.

“This (kidnapping a drugged tourist) has happened at least twenty times before and nothing ever went wrong. Most of the time they take the girl back to her hotel (Satish) to have sex with the incapacitated tourist in a hotel room (Joran).

If this is what happened how could Aruba resolve this case?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Puzzler on December 09, 2007, 01:56:38 PM
With all that has been going on of late, I have to wonder why in the world the vd Sloots and their evil cadre are all over the newspapers, preening and posing, pants unzipped, see through paraphernalia and all and generally seen as celebrating as though they are so happy that this young girl is still missing.

Is this not the height of callous behavior and poor taste?


They have no shame nor pride.

Eurotrash?

amoebas



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 09, 2007, 01:59:03 PM
Mos came out with guns ablazin'.

He said that he has Explosive new evidence.
He said that he had proof that Natalee was dead.
He said that the father was definately involved.
He was willing to talk.
He gave us all hope and made us believe in him. (except San)

What happened to him?  Who got to him?
Just before the Kalpoes were released he suddenly canceled
a news conference and his next interview he blamed the
family, the media and the DEA agent. He was suddenly
like a different man.

Where is the explosive new evidence? 
How did he know that the Kalpoes disposed of the body?

It is all goofy!




VAN SUSTEREN: Is there anything new?

TACOPINA: Not for my eyes.

VAN SUSTEREN: Are there new wiretaps?

TACOPINA: There are new recordings.





Hans Mos
ABC NEWS
November 26, 2007

Hans Mos, Aruba's chief prosecutor, told ABC News he believes the the new evidence makes the case against the three men stronger than it was two years.

"We are convinced if we had had this evidence we have now they would not have been released by the court at that time," Mos said.



We Learned Something New In The Natalee Holloway Investigation
by Greta Van Susteren Gretawire.com

CAR WASHING - Greta interviews off camera the neighbor to Kalpoe brothers who saw them washing their car the night
Natalee disappeared.

_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
Tacopino said directly: "the homes were bugged and one of the Kalpoe brothers was taped admitting he had returned later to the beach that night"





MOS: New evidence is evidence that we didn't have before. As simple as that.

new evidence gained after the moment that they were released,

the evidence is just material, but they have to be confronted with that because they were never confronted with those findings.



MOS has stated:
 
we had to confront them with it. They are suspects, each of them, and they are witnesses against the other, possible. So we have to question them.

That's what we are aiming for. And if this information given by them shows that they are not involved, then they will not be prosecuted. But we don't think that that's the case.

We are not desperate.

we cannot disclose it at this time.

It's not just one person taking that decision. We take it as an organization, and meaning (ph) an organization, we (INAUDIBLE) with -- there are 45 people here, and they contribute one way or another in this case,


decision to re-arrest these three suspects was a decision taken by 10 lawyers, by 10 lawyers sitting around a table (INAUDIBLE) whole afternoon, being presented the new material.


The execution of the whole investigation is done by police officers, who were, in this case, after the Dutch were involved, handpicked from the Netherlands






Greta:

So it's physical evidence, something you can actually touch or feel

JQK: Or see. Sure.

Greta: or some scientific thing

JQK: Absolutely

Evidence - JQK

"I can't specifically answer but i think the evidence that they have their hands on now will do a lot to clarify the timeline, the whereabouts, the actions and where everybody was that night and the time it was when they were at certain places and what was going on."


THEN KELLY STATED
The report of significant new incriminating evidence was misleading," Kelly said. "It was the same evidence or lack of evidence they had from the very beginning."
_______________________________________

Dave Holloway: “There is always hope of finding Natalee alive; however, police are saying to look in the sea”
http://tinyurl.com/2yh3b8

Sumpin' just ain't right.  In retrotpsect, sounds like a bunch of lying liars, all of whom are lying for their lying liar agendas.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: NYC_lover on December 09, 2007, 02:04:18 PM

nyclover.  did you hear peter devries say anything about natalee's case?
dennisintn

Dennis - Well, a week ago, the Holloway case was in Peter R. De Vries his programm.
Peter and another crime reports have just make crime reports about the Holloway case, in RTL Boulevard.
But about that all is nothing new. I early had post what all the crime reports had tell about the Holloway case.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 09, 2007, 02:05:59 PM
Just wanted to bid everyone au revoir for the day.  Grandson and son participating in Christmas musical at church this evening, and I gotta run in order to be there on time.

 "The wrong shall fail and right prevail with peace on earth,good will to men".


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: dennisintn on December 09, 2007, 02:09:38 PM

nyclover.  did you hear peter devries say anything about natalee's case?
dennisintn

Dennis - Well, a week ago, the Holloway case was in Peter R. De Vries his programm.
Peter and another crime reports have just make crime reports about the Holloway case, in RTL Boulevard.
But about that all is nothing new. I early had post what all the crime reports had tell about the Holloway case.


thank you, ma'am, i'll dig them up.  have a great day.
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: NYC_lover on December 09, 2007, 02:12:08 PM

nyclover.  did you hear peter devries say anything about natalee's case?
dennisintn

Dennis - Well, a week ago, the Holloway case was in Peter R. De Vries his programm.
Peter and another crime reports have just make crime reports about the Holloway case, in RTL Boulevard.
But about that all is nothing new. I early had post what all the crime reports had tell about the Holloway case.


thank you, ma'am, i'll dig them up.  have a great day.
dennisintn

You are welcome, but what does this mean; ma'am?
And btw, thanks have a great day too.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 09, 2007, 02:13:00 PM

******* and/or Klassend,

Would you look at that video again.
It looks to me as though he [Paulus] takes a sip from his drink,
It looks like a small pile of chips in front of him
then his right hand picks up chips off the blackjack table and then
he removes his hand from the table and under the table -  when the video goes fuzzy

Why would one remove chips from the table though if that is what I saw?

http://abcnews.go.com/Video/playerIndex?id=3922731&affil=wlne


(http://img236.imageshack.us/img236/9844/paulusincasino2eq5.jpg)
See his hand, watch it.



Just got back from the store and I've watched the video.  I didn't see him remove chips from the table but I'll watch again.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Helen Back on December 09, 2007, 02:18:54 PM
Investigate the Judges and their brotherhood (and teflon shield).

We all know there is major corruption going on... The judges seems to be a good place to start...

Investigate also the Aruban government at the Minister level... Since Paulus is an apostle of Rudy Croes then it makes sense that the "brotherhood" has deep roots.

Investigate the "Posner" effect ... the brotherhood must get it's funding from somewhere...

If they want the focus off the JK2 then lets re-set the fire where it needs to be -- on discovering who is calling the shots and isolating the masterminds... They believe they are above the law since they are the ones who make the law...

Noriega thought he was above the law too... Now he rots in a U.S. Prison.  IF we can capture a head of state then surely we can capture despots at minister and judicial and polis levels who grow corruption for their own gain...

In the end this may be the only solution...

btw... take a good look at the Posner cases that Smid has been involved with and you will get my drift...

Hey Silverfox,

I'm very interested in the Posner cases that Smid has been involved in.  Where can this information be found?  Thanks.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 09, 2007, 02:23:33 PM
Well if it was the ALE who told Dave to 'look to the sea'...then she can't be there.  :smt017 ALE doesn't want her to be found.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 09, 2007, 02:27:32 PM
People Magazine Dec 7

Joran van der Sloot, one of three young men last seen with Natalee Holloway in Aruba, was set free Friday by an Aruban judge who ruled there was not enough evidence to hold him for an additional 60 days of pretrial detention.

A week ago, Aruban Court of Instruction Judge Rick Smid also ruled there was not enough evidence to hold co-defendants Deepak Kalpoe, 24, and his brother Satish, 21.

The release of van der Sloot, 20, comes as no surprise to the family of Holloway, the Alabama teen who disappeared in 2005. The attorney for Beth Holloway, Natalee's mother, told PEOPLE earlier the case would be dropped soon.

"If they don't have enough to hold them to simply interrogate them, they don't have enough to hold them to face charges," New York lawyer John Q. Kelly said. "They certainly don't have enough to convict them of the charges. It's pretty simple stuff."

Aruba's chief prosecutor, Hans Mos, says he will announce later this month whether he will proceed to trial against the three young men. They were last seen driving Holloway, 18 at the time, from a popular nightclub May 30, 2005, several hours before she was to fly home with members from her graduating class.

If new evidence arises, Mos says he has plenty of time to bring the case to trial because the statute of limitations is 18 years from the time of Holloway's disappearance.

"We still have another 15 years to wait for new evidence," he says.
http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20165014,00.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 09, 2007, 02:30:16 PM
People Magazine Dec 7

Joran van der Sloot, one of three young men last seen with Natalee Holloway in Aruba, was set free Friday by an Aruban judge who ruled there was not enough evidence to hold him for an additional 60 days of pretrial detention.

A week ago, Aruban Court of Instruction Judge Rick Smid also ruled there was not enough evidence to hold co-defendants Deepak Kalpoe, 24, and his brother Satish, 21.

The release of van der Sloot, 20, comes as no surprise to the family of Holloway, the Alabama teen who disappeared in 2005. The attorney for Beth Holloway, Natalee's mother, told PEOPLE earlier the case would be dropped soon.

"If they don't have enough to hold them to simply interrogate them, they don't have enough to hold them to face charges," New York lawyer John Q. Kelly said. "They certainly don't have enough to convict them of the charges. It's pretty simple stuff."

Aruba's chief prosecutor, Hans Mos, says he will announce later this month whether he will proceed to trial against the three young men. They were last seen driving Holloway, 18 at the time, from a popular nightclub May 30, 2005, several hours before she was to fly home with members from her graduating class.

If new evidence arises, Mos says he has plenty of time to bring the case to trial because the statute of limitations is 18 years from the time of Holloway's disappearance.

"We still have another 15 years to wait for new evidence," he says.

http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20165014,00.html

Not that I believe a word any of them say


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Observer on December 09, 2007, 02:32:18 PM

******* and/or Klassend,

Would you look at that video again.
It looks to me as though he [Paulus] takes a sip from his drink,
It looks like a small pile of chips in front of him
then his right hand picks up chips off the blackjack table and then
he removes his hand from the table and under the table -  when the video goes fuzzy

Why would one remove chips from the table though if that is what I saw?

http://abcnews.go.com/Video/playerIndex?id=3922731&affil=wlne


(http://img236.imageshack.us/img236/9844/paulusincasino2eq5.jpg)
See his hand, watch it.



I don't know if he took any chips but his hand was clearly on them then it went below the table. Putting your a hand below the table is frowned upon big time in vegas.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Susebear on December 09, 2007, 02:37:37 PM
Hi everyone, greetings from west Texas where I am maintaing my 2 1/2 year mostly quiet vigil.  Recent events have effected me as well as you all and I had to have a serious talk with myself when I realized how crabby I was acting because of the depressing turn in the case.  The level in our proverbial glass is never constant but let us remember that Joran just spent 2 weeks in jail and thats more justice than was dished out last year.  It ain't much, but I'm thankful for the few drops I have.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Observer on December 09, 2007, 02:38:52 PM
"We still have another 15 years to wait for new evidence," he says.
http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20165014,00.html
-----------------------------
Sure like we believe anything you say anymore. All one big sham of draggin this out and stalling but never attempting to find the truth or any attempt to prosecute anybody for any crime.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: dennisintn on December 09, 2007, 02:46:19 PM


You are welcome, but what does this mean; ma'am?
And btw, thanks have a great day too.
[/quote]

lol, it's a show of respect and courtesy to the person you're talking to.  ma'am to women, and sir to men.  taught at an early age to southerners of my vintage.  not even allowed to be used in some schools these days.  old south ways are dying at a rapid clip.  it doesn't mean there was anything wrong with them, just different.
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: NYC_lover on December 09, 2007, 03:01:33 PM


You are welcome, but what does this mean; ma'am?
And btw, thanks have a great day too.

lol, it's a show of respect and courtesy to the person you're talking to.  ma'am to women, and sir to men.  taught at an early age to southerners of my vintage.  not even allowed to be used in some schools these days.  old south ways are dying at a rapid clip.  it doesn't mean there was anything wrong with them, just different.
dennisintn
[/quote]

Ok, I understand now ma'am, full writing madam. I used this many time, to people that I don't know and people that been older then me. And that is why I tell all the time U, in place of YOU.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: NYC_lover on December 09, 2007, 03:06:58 PM
People Magazine Dec 7

Joran van der Sloot, one of three young men last seen with Natalee Holloway in Aruba, was set free Friday by an Aruban judge who ruled there was not enough evidence to hold him for an additional 60 days of pretrial detention.

A week ago, Aruban Court of Instruction Judge Rick Smid also ruled there was not enough evidence to hold co-defendants Deepak Kalpoe, 24, and his brother Satish, 21.

The release of van der Sloot, 20, comes as no surprise to the family of Holloway, the Alabama teen who disappeared in 2005. The attorney for Beth Holloway, Natalee's mother, told PEOPLE earlier the case would be dropped soon.

"If they don't have enough to hold them to simply interrogate them, they don't have enough to hold them to face charges," New York lawyer John Q. Kelly said. "They certainly don't have enough to convict them of the charges. It's pretty simple stuff."

Aruba's chief prosecutor, Hans Mos, says he will announce later this month whether he will proceed to trial against the three young men. They were last seen driving Holloway, 18 at the time, from a popular nightclub May 30, 2005, several hours before she was to fly home with members from her graduating class.

If new evidence arises, Mos says he has plenty of time to bring the case to trial because the statute of limitations is 18 years from the time of Holloway's disappearance.

"We still have another 15 years to wait for new evidence," he says.
http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20165014,00.html

What still another 15 year to wait for new evidence. How dare YOU MOS?
When they says waiting, waiting does mean in the Netherlands, never solved.
I HATE THIS LAW SYSTEM!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on December 09, 2007, 03:27:57 PM
People Magazine Dec 7

Joran van der Sloot, one of three young men last seen with Natalee Holloway in Aruba, was set free Friday by an Aruban judge who ruled there was not enough evidence to hold him for an additional 60 days of pretrial detention.

A week ago, Aruban Court of Instruction Judge Rick Smid also ruled there was not enough evidence to hold co-defendants Deepak Kalpoe, 24, and his brother Satish, 21.

The release of van der Sloot, 20, comes as no surprise to the family of Holloway, the Alabama teen who disappeared in 2005. The attorney for Beth Holloway, Natalee's mother, told PEOPLE earlier the case would be dropped soon.

"If they don't have enough to hold them to simply interrogate them, they don't have enough to hold them to face charges," New York lawyer John Q. Kelly said. "They certainly don't have enough to convict them of the charges. It's pretty simple stuff."

Aruba's chief prosecutor, Hans Mos, says he will announce later this month whether he will proceed to trial against the three young men. They were last seen driving Holloway, 18 at the time, from a popular nightclub May 30, 2005, several hours before she was to fly home with members from her graduating class.

If new evidence arises, Mos says he has plenty of time to bring the case to trial because the statute of limitations is 18 years from the time of Holloway's disappearance.

"We still have another 15 years to wait for new evidence," he says.
http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20165014,00.html
So they will or will not close out the case?If they don't close it out,Beth and Dave won't get the case files?Or will they still get the case files?OR,can aruba be any more confusing?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Helen Back on December 09, 2007, 03:32:55 PM
Well, I still would like to know about the Posner/Judge Smid connection, but Silverfox must be off napping. 

In the meantime, I went to do a little more reading on Posner/Chicago mob/gambling, etc.  Ugh!
Interesting in the "mob vocabulary or glossary", which I don't speak, this tidbit:

Trunk Music ... to be murdered and put in a trunk.
Where the corpse usually ends up. The "music" is the sound
of the flesh rotting in the trunk, according to Rocco Infelise who described it
to FBI mole William B.J. Jahoda, who was wired.

Sorry guys.  :shock:  Now I need another shower.

Starting to understand a little more about why Joe Tacopino is so heavily involved with the Sloots.    As we all knew, he wasn't on the case because of this dazzling brilliance.  The Sloots need a different type of advice, and I think it's much about Paulus.

Still would love to have more Posner/Smid info.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 09, 2007, 03:43:04 PM
Silverfox asked us to look at it and sounded like he had one, but didn't provide a link  :gaah:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: JA on December 09, 2007, 03:45:10 PM


You are welcome, but what does this mean; ma'am?
And btw, thanks have a great day too.

lol, it's a show of respect and courtesy to the person you're talking to.  ma'am to women, and sir to men.  taught at an early age to southerners of my vintage.  not even allowed to be used in some schools these days.  old south ways are dying at a rapid clip.  it doesn't mean there was anything wrong with them, just different.
dennisintn
[/quote]

Dennis,

I teach 5th/6th in the north and I just love it when I get a student from the south!  Doesn't matter their academic level, their behavior, or what.  I always get a ma'am and my male co-workers get a sir. When talking to these students I always get full atention, or it appears to be (LOL) from direct eye contact.   I love it!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 09, 2007, 03:46:23 PM
IMO Aruban officials would love nothing more than to make this family wait another 15 years. They are barbaric and enjoy watching this family suffer in the utmost agony imaginable.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 09, 2007, 03:52:06 PM
I wonder if Joran went out to C&C's last night. The Magic 96.5 photo gallery has:
 
'A HOT Saturday Night @ Carlos N Charlies 8 Dec' listed, but no photos (0)

Q-Sign A Pone Drama Den Cafe Bahia 8 Dec (0) photos too...

Sabado Latino En Mambo Jambo 8 Dec  (0) photos too..

Weird...I don't think I have ever seen them listed if they have no photos to post. Strange.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Helen Back on December 09, 2007, 04:03:34 PM
Maybe Tacopino brought his "forensic scientist" to sweep the BUGS out of the Sloot house.  :)



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: dennisintn on December 09, 2007, 04:11:44 PM
Maybe Tacopino brought his "forensic scientist" to sweep the BUGS out of the Sloot house.  :)



i'd bet somebody swept it for bugs. don't know about his "forensic scientist"  being good enough to trust that job to though.
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 09, 2007, 04:17:21 PM
Silverfox asked us to look at it and sounded like he had one, but didn't provide a link  :gaah:

I tried to do some searching but didn't come up with anything.  If Silverfox is in the Phillipines, it's early Monday, right?  May have to wait until later, and maybe he'll throw us a bone.  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Helen Back on December 09, 2007, 04:17:54 PM
Have to go out for a bit.  If Silverfox shows up, somebody grab him and get some links for the Posner/Smid info!

TTL





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Kermit on December 09, 2007, 04:23:21 PM

******* and/or Klassend,

Would you look at that video again.
It looks to me as though he [Paulus] takes a sip from his drink,
It looks like a small pile of chips in front of him
then his right hand picks up chips off the blackjack table and then
he removes his hand from the table and under the table -  when the video goes fuzzy

Why would one remove chips from the table though if that is what I saw?

http://abcnews.go.com/Video/playerIndex?id=3922731&affil=wlne


(http://img236.imageshack.us/img236/9844/paulusincasino2eq5.jpg)
See his hand, watch it.



I don't know if he took any chips but his hand was clearly on them then it went below the table. Putting your a hand below the table is frowned upon big time in vegas.

I remember the first time I watched it, over & over, that it looked like Paulus and I thought it was money he took off the table, but that would not happen because you use chips. It was always in the back of my mind, but I didn't dwell on it until you brought up the video again. Something is not right with his removing something from that table while it looks like distraction going on.

Great job with the photo of the camera btw!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: robots on December 09, 2007, 04:23:24 PM
1.people cleaning their cars at 3:00 are covering up

2.she hit her head when she got out of the car

3.blood turns into chocolate

i hope they all burn in hell

deepak, satish, paulus and joran are going to be on the RUN for the rest of their lives
it has been 2.5 years and their time would have already been served practically at this point.
instead they willfully chose to make the parents hurt even more instead of coming clean and telling the truth, the truth will come out eventually

somethings are UNFORGIVEABLE and this is one of them

and for the CREEPS that also helped cover it up... yea you can burn in hell too.

its as simple as that


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Kermit on December 09, 2007, 04:24:05 PM
Have to go out for a bit.  If Silverfox shows up, somebody grab him and get some links for the Posner/Smid info!

TTL





Freebirds did something on that Judge Smid. Maybe someone has the link to their blog.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Kermit on December 09, 2007, 04:25:14 PM
1.people cleaning their cars at 3:00 are covering up

2.she hit her head when she got out of the car

3.blood turns into chocolate

i hope they all burn in hell

deepak, satish, paulus and joran are going to be on the RUN for the rest of their lives
it has been 2.5 years and their time would have already been served practically at this point.
instead they willfully chose to make the parents hurt even more instead of coming clean and telling the truth, the truth will come out eventually

somethings are UNFORGIVEABLE and this is one of them

and for the CREEPS that also helped cover it up... yea you can burn in hell too.

its as simple as that


Perhaps MOS and Dolph need help in clearing things up.

Monkey's gather in the cage and let's give em what they need to bring these punks to trial!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: robots on December 09, 2007, 04:26:43 PM
1.people cleaning their cars at 3:00 are covering up

2.she hit her head when she got out of the car

3.blood turns into chocolate

i hope they all burn in hell

deepak, satish, paulus and joran are going to be on the RUN for the rest of their lives
it has been 2.5 years and their time would have already been served practically at this point.
instead they willfully chose to make the parents hurt even more instead of coming clean and telling the truth, the truth will come out eventually

somethings are UNFORGIVEABLE and this is one of them

and for the CREEPS that also helped cover it up... yea you can burn in hell too.

its as simple as that


Perhaps MOS and Dolph need help in clearing things up.

Monkey's gather in the cage and let's give em what they need to bring these punks to trial!



i think that is a great idea and then we will post it all over the internet so everyone in the world can see it... and maybe greta will get to see it also. :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 09, 2007, 04:29:07 PM
Have to go out for a bit.  If Silverfox shows up, somebody grab him and get some links for the Posner/Smid info!

TTL





Freebirds did something on that Judge Smid. Maybe someone has the link to their blog.



http://nataleesfreebirds.blogspot.com/2007/11/dutch-judicial-system.html

(snipped)

JUDGE RICK SMID SHIELDS MAIN SUSPECT FROM PROSECUTION

In a hearing on June 1, 2005 Dutch judge Rick Smid ruled there was sufficient evidence to keep Joran van der Sloot in detention for an additional 30 days. Then in a baffling move, he flies back to Curacao and faxes in a reversal of the ruling he’d made only a few hours earlier, freeing van der Sloot from jail. Within three days Joran van der Sloot was on an airplane for Holland, and to make sure van der Sloot would never face prosecution, the judges gave Joran and the Kalpoe brothers immunity from ever being questioned again about this case.

ASSOCIATED PRESS
September 1, 2005

The judge in the case issued two rulings: In the first, he agreed with prosecutors' request to extend the period of van der Sloot's pretrial detention by 30 more days. But later Thursday, the judge issued another ruling that sided with the defense — an order to immediately suspend the execution of his earlier pretrial detention order.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9163292/

BETH TWITTY
NANCY GRACE September 13, 2005

GRACE: What was the grounds? Why did they release them?
TWITTY: You know, Nancy, there was absolutely no -- no grounds for them to be released. And I spoke with the Dutch interrogators. And even as of September the 1st, things were really progressing well, and Joran and Deepak and Satish, they had -- these young men had divided, and they were not denying a crime anymore. They were merely implicating each other. And the list of inconsistencies was presented before Judge Smit. The reasonable doubt was there. I don`t have any idea why he fled the island and then faxed a reversal decision. It just is incredible.
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0509/13/ng.01.html

Judge Rick Smid was well aware at the time of his ruling that in their police statements Joran and the Kalpoe brothers differed on key events that supposedly occurred that night. Joran had told five different stories about how he got home that night, none of them agreeing with the Kalpoes’ account. Joran had also said in one of his statements that Deepak murdered Natalee and buried her on the beach near the Fishermen’s Huts, a statment that Deepak vehemently denied. One of the suspects even admitted to police interrogators that "Something bad happened to Natalee." the night she disappeared.

JOSSY MANSUR, EDITOR DIARIO ARUBA
Monday, November 21, 2005

They themselves admitted to police during interrogations that something bad happened to Natalee while she was with them, without specifying what ‘something bad’ was! That they admitted to committing sexual abuse against her. ??It is not extensive that the judge who presided over the case and decided that some things were inadmissible. He could be the best judge in the world, but in this case, he made light of and greatly neglected to pay attention to the three suspects’ admissions, since he didn’t even interrogate them about what was left hanging in the air, such as the declaration of Joran at the beach that he believes that Deepak raped and killed Natalee! How did this matter end there? How were the other accusations and counter-accusations among the three suspects not evaluated for their just content?

In essence, there were many differences in the three suspects’ stories which would indicate one or more of them were guilty of the disappearance of Natalee Holloway, but Judge Smid chose to ignore these discrepancies. He also used an obscure ruling from the Ponson case that stated Joran’s eduction was of utmost importance—moreso than the murder investigation—which allowed Joran to flee the island and opened the door for the judges from Curacao to land the final blow on the case by lifting all restrictions against the main suspects.

In another move on behalf of Paulus van der Sloot and his son Joran, at the end of July, 2005 Judge Rick Smid ordered the DNA taken from the three main suspects destroyed. Joran van der Sloot and the Kalpoe brothers remain the three main suspects to this day, with Joran being considered the prime suspect.

Judge Rick Smid is a pox on the Dutch judicial system and should be removed from office. The damage he and Judge Bob Wit did to the Natalee Holloway case is unfathomable, and both of these judges should be punished for their actions.

Furthermore the top judicial officials in Holland should start an investigation as to why these judges who were friends and acquaintances of Paulus van der Sloot were allowed to rule on the court proceedings for both he and his son.

THE CURACAO JUDGES ACT IN UNISON TO FREE THE VAN DER SLOOTS

Three weeks after Judge Smid released Joran under the obscure Ponson rule (which originally applied to a baseball player's right to get an eductaion, a crime nowhere as serious as rape and murder) a panel of three judges released all restrictions on Joran van der Sloot and the Kalpoe brothers. They were all free to leave the island and never had to return for questioning by the police interrogators again. These judges also knew of the conflicting stories between Joran Van der Sloot and the Kalpoe brothers but totally ignored them in spite of the fact they suggest guilt.

JOSSY MANSUR, EDITOR DIARIO ARUBA
Monday, October 1, 2005

Did the judge who came from Curacao probably plan take the decisions he took, spoiled the case? With all due respect for the position you have taken, have you seen what happened???The case was resolved in phases the same judge planned: first release Paul v.d. Sloot , then he came back to release the Kalpoe brothers and the third phase he executed now when came to set Joran free because Joran expressed his wish to continue his studies. ??I have similarly not made any accusations of any sort against the Kalpoe brothers; what I have repeated is what can be found in the Polis reports where they started pointing the fingers one against the other! It is in these three phases here that Americans see the corruption of our justice system.

With the ruling in Curacao, the Dutch judges had now accomplished their mission of denying justice to Natalee Holloway and her family. These biased rulings have de-railed the case the Holloway case and smack of corruption among all the Dutch juges in the Netherland Antilles.

THE DUTCH JUDICIARY SHOULD HAVE IMMEDIATELY RECOGNIZED THE CONFLICT OF INTEREST IN THE NATALEE HOLLOWAY CASE AND SENT A TEAM OF UNBIASED JUDGES TO THE NETHERLAND ANTILLES TO OVERSEE THE CASE. INSTEAD, THEY LET CORRUPTION RUN RAMPANT WHICH HAS RESULTED IN THE CRIMES AGAINST MISS HOLLOWAY TO GO UNPUNISHED.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: igsigs on December 09, 2007, 04:34:43 PM
FierlJepper @ scrux says...  that the drug witness PV used by DeVries ... states that it was given by a *friend of Joran*.

Unbelievable


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 09, 2007, 04:40:08 PM
Maybe Tacopino brought his "forensic scientist" to sweep the BUGS out of the Sloot house.  :)



Paulus also probably set up 'the guys' with the best little whorehouse on the island :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Kermit on December 09, 2007, 04:44:12 PM
(http://img225.imageshack.us/img225/5983/paulushandundertableqm7.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Kermit on December 09, 2007, 04:44:55 PM
1.people cleaning their cars at 3:00 are covering up

2.she hit her head when she got out of the car

3.blood turns into chocolate

i hope they all burn in hell

deepak, satish, paulus and joran are going to be on the RUN for the rest of their lives
it has been 2.5 years and their time would have already been served practically at this point.
instead they willfully chose to make the parents hurt even more instead of coming clean and telling the truth, the truth will come out eventually

somethings are UNFORGIVEABLE and this is one of them

and for the CREEPS that also helped cover it up... yea you can burn in hell too.

its as simple as that


Perhaps MOS and Dolph need help in clearing things up.

Monkey's gather in the cage and let's give em what they need to bring these punks to trial!



i think that is a great idea and then we will post it all over the internet so everyone in the world can see it... and maybe greta will get to see it also. :cool:

Yep.

and

Email it to Greta's producer!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Kermit on December 09, 2007, 04:45:31 PM
That's the one Miss Klassend, thank you.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Kermit on December 09, 2007, 04:47:57 PM
(http://img225.imageshack.us/img225/5983/paulushandundertableqm7.jpg)


From the angle of the pit boss' hand, it appears his back is to Paulus
and eyes are distracted when Paulus hand goes under the table right after being
on top of a stack of chips, albeit they are most likely his winnings, but still very odd for someone to do that.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: dennisintn on December 09, 2007, 04:48:14 PM

thanks, klaasend.  according to the "deny till you die" crowd on aruba, we're supposed to have forgotten all these things that happened during summer, fall 05.  our memories fading into the sunset and us along with them.  only by refreshing these memories for everyone does natalee's family stand a chance of winning natalee back and justice for her.
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Kermit on December 09, 2007, 04:54:54 PM
Maybe Tacopino brought his "forensic scientist" to sweep the BUGS out of the Sloot house.  :)



Paulus also probably set up 'the guys' with the best little whorehouse on the island :roll:


Most likely friends with Posner they were running their own porn money making deals. Remember Bailey that the SM'ers exposed had been in Deepak's car after being at Carlos n' Charlie's and then taken to The Mill hotel.


Pattern of behavior that these "suspects" were able to get hotel rooms to take tourist girls.

They set up and targeted tourists. Joran admitted he "did this 20 times before"

And Deepak stated, "You're own father!"





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Kermit on December 09, 2007, 04:56:15 PM

thanks, klaasend.  according to the "deny till you die" crowd on aruba, we're supposed to have forgotten all these things that happened during summer, fall 05.  our memories fading into the sunset and us along with them.  only by refreshing these memories for everyone does natalee's family stand a chance of winning natalee back and justice for her.
dennisintn

I agree dennis,

Let's keep on exposing the truth.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Leslie on December 09, 2007, 04:56:28 PM
FierlJepper @ scrux says...  that the drug witness PV used by DeVries ... states that it was given by a *friend of Joran*.
Unbelievable
Thank you!  That person was born in Aruba in the month of December:
Who could it be?  I must compare the witness statement list with the above information and come up with a list. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: robots on December 09, 2007, 05:10:57 PM
at 4:03 you can see it ........the HUMAN SWEAT MACHINE


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 09, 2007, 05:28:11 PM
"We still have another 15 years to wait for new evidence," he says.
From the People article, is this going to be their out to let any other agency or the family to see what they have NOW ?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Leslie on December 09, 2007, 05:30:30 PM
Random:

Watching a biography of Lee Marvin - he attended St Leo's in Florida.

The aforementionned ABC casino video shows Joran walking in at the 4:00 mark and from 4:01 to 4: 13 shows the group at the blackjack table.  I do not see Paul making the chips-under-the-table movement in that time frame, but I have seen it before, on other frames from the video.  It looked like he was trying to have a reason to look up Natalee's skirt by bending low and turning to his right.   ( I am on dial-up and a 10 minute video takes an hour to play in its entirety. It is handy by freezing frames. )  I am only at the 7:45 mark, so maybe there is more of the casino video yet to come. 



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: San on December 09, 2007, 05:37:25 PM
"We still have another 15 years to wait for new evidence," he says.
From the People article, is this going to be their out to let any other agency or the family to see what they have NOW ?

I was thinking of the same thing Kat.  By then they will hope that we would forget about this case.

I believe Aruba will never give up the any statements/evidence.  They will be defiant and just say no you can't have it.

I hope Paulus, Anita, Rudy Croes, Nelson Odobur, Dennis Jacobs, Van der Straaten, Smit are all dead by then.  They all deserve to rot in hell for what they did.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: San on December 09, 2007, 05:41:42 PM
Random:

Watching a biography of Lee Marvin - he attended St Leo's in Florida.

The aforementionned ABC casino video shows Joran walking in at the 4:00 mark and from 4:01 to 4: 13 shows the group at the blackjack table.  I do not see Paul making the chips-under-the-table movement in that time frame, but I have seen it before, on other frames from the video.  It looked like he was trying to have a reason to look up Natalee's skirt by bending low and turning to his right.   ( I am on dial-up and a 10 minute video takes an hour to play in its entirety. It is handy by freezing frames. )  I am only at the 7:45 mark, so maybe there is more of the casino video yet to come. 


If you look at that picture Paulus seems to be listening to Natalee and from what you can see she is trying to sit far away from Paulus and Joran is listening to her friend.

Could Paulus and Joran be giving each other signals.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: longhaul on December 09, 2007, 05:44:11 PM


You are welcome, but what does this mean; ma'am?
And btw, thanks have a great day too.

lol, it's a show of respect and courtesy to the person you're talking to.  ma'am to women, and sir to men.  taught at an early age to southerners of my vintage.  not even allowed to be used in some schools these days.  old south ways are dying at a rapid clip.  it doesn't mean there was anything wrong with them, just different.
dennisintn
[/quote]



Hey Monkeys, thought this was a good place to jump in!  Even in KY I have taught my kids the ma'am and sir thing!!  Let me intro myself here by saying I have followed this sight since the start and all of you are awesome people with huge hearts who seem to want nothing but the truth in regards to what happened to Natalee.  At this point we can only pray that perhaps the Persevernce finds her and can return her to her family. 



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: longhaul on December 09, 2007, 05:47:02 PM
ok so I screwed up the quote thing.......sorry!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: San on December 09, 2007, 05:48:04 PM

Hey Monkeys, thought this was a good place to jump in!  Even in KY I have taught my kids the ma'am and sir thing!!  Let me intro myself here by saying I have followed this sight since the start and all of you are awesome people with huge hearts who seem to want nothing but the truth in regards to what happened to Natalee.  At this point we can only pray that perhaps the Persevernce finds her and can return her to her family. 

Welcome longhaul.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 09, 2007, 05:48:32 PM
FierlJepper @ scrux says...  that the drug witness PV used by DeVries ... states that it was given by a *friend of Joran*.
Unbelievable
Thank you!  That person was born in Aruba in the month of December:
Who could it be?  I must compare the witness statement list with the above information and come up with a list. 


I checked a bunch of them and the only one whose birthdays are not listed are (or that I can't see) are Steve Croes and Freddy  :2thinky:

Still looking......


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 09, 2007, 05:49:02 PM
(http://img225.imageshack.us/img225/5983/paulushandundertableqm7.jpg)

Maybe he's just zipping up his fly  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: San on December 09, 2007, 05:49:06 PM
ok so I screwed up the quote thing.......sorry!!!

No worry it happens all the time.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: San on December 09, 2007, 05:50:11 PM
(http://img225.imageshack.us/img225/5983/paulushandundertableqm7.jpg)

Maybe he's just zipping up his fly  :wink:

 :lol: :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 09, 2007, 05:50:14 PM
ok so I screwed up the quote thing.......sorry!!!


lol..no problem, we all do that.
Welcome to SM


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: longhaul on December 09, 2007, 05:58:09 PM
Thanks ya'll!! 

And I agree the PVS needs to be heavily looked.  As we say here in my little "podunk" town,  "something just aint right there!"


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 09, 2007, 06:01:22 PM
Thanks ya'll!! 

And I agree the PVS needs to be heavily looked.  As we say here in my little "podunk" town,  "something just aint right there!"

Welcome Longhaul!

I think people are affraid if they look too long at PVDS they'll go blind, :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: longhaul on December 09, 2007, 06:08:14 PM
Lmao Klass,  blind is an understatement!  I want to puke everytime I see him or JR for that matter.  But looking closer at these pics we've seen today and reading from the very first day that Natalee went missing,  dear poppa is as guilty as the rest! 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Leslie on December 09, 2007, 06:10:23 PM
(http://img225.imageshack.us/img225/5983/paulushandundertableqm7.jpg)
Maybe he's just zipping up his fly  :wink:
Or unzipping it!  Around the 8:58 mark.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 09, 2007, 06:12:37 PM
NEW FRONT PAGE POST:

http://scaredmonkeys.com/2007/12/09/jossy-mansur-provides-an-opinion-on-the-actions-of-aruban-prosecutor-hans-mos/

Jossy Mansur Provides an Opinion on the Actions of Aruban Prosecutor Hans Mos


Note:  be sure to read to the very end


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 09, 2007, 06:13:41 PM
Lmao Klass,  blind is an understatement!  I want to puke everytime I see him or JR for that matter.  But looking closer at these pics we've seen today and reading from the very first day that Natalee went missing,  dear poppa is as guilty as the rest! 

Yes, he most certainly is.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Red on December 09, 2007, 06:15:58 PM
NEW FRONT PAGE POST:

http://scaredmonkeys.com/2007/12/09/jossy-mansur-provides-an-opinion-on-the-actions-of-aruban-prosecutor-hans-mos/

Jossy Mansur Provides an Opinion on the Actions of Aruban Prosecutor Hans Mos


Note:  be sure to read to the very end

Jossy has acted like a true news person wanting to get to the truth. Not being a tool of the government like many other publications in Aruba.

Your job is not to be a government tool, that would make you nothing more than propaganda, not the news.

Thank you Jossy!

We will give it our best to prove to Mos and his associates that the case cannot be closed while there is so much fact, indication and admissions in play! (Jossy Mansur)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 09, 2007, 06:24:12 PM
We only saw a portion of the tape of Gerald Dompig telling all in Jossy's office.

I have always wanted to see what else Dompig had to say.

Jossy probably has more than ALE since they had that little tendency to throw everything they didn't like away.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 09, 2007, 06:30:32 PM
Something else dawned on me today while away.

When Paulus was screeching "You have no jurisdiction, You have NO jurisdiction!"  I now believe he thought they were actually going to arrest Joran on the spot.  That would explain his non sequitur comment.

Instead of seeing parents desperately looking for their child, he was so short sighted and self absorbed he could only see danger for his own perfectly safe child.

.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: longhaul on December 09, 2007, 06:32:35 PM
We only saw a portion of the tape of Gerald Dompig telling all in Jossy's office.

I have always wanted to see what else Dompig had to say.

Jossy probably has more than ALE since they had that little tendency to throw everything they didn't like away.



Anna,  the whole Jossy thing.....I agree,  he has been the one stronghold (dont care what others say) in this whole situation.  But alas at this point,  all I want is Natalee brought home so she can be laid to rest in the country that she was born. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Blue Moon on December 09, 2007, 06:33:45 PM
(http://img225.imageshack.us/img225/5983/paulushandundertableqm7.jpg)


Kermit, maybe he is zipping his pants up :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Elaine on December 09, 2007, 06:36:27 PM
Hello.... I need a favor from the person or persons who ran the blog
joranvandersloot.blogspot.com
The blog is no longer active, however I have a post from one of the comment pages on that blog., left by an anonymous poster with broken English. The post has chilling consistencies to the latest Revelations from the prosecution. The part about wiping out evidence and spiriting away a body. This poster was trying to tell us what happened. I guess at the time the post was overlooked as there were hundreds of comments on the page.The post gave much detail ast to who and how.
........................The owner of that blog could trace the post because they had a site meter at the time. If you ran that blog please contact me, and I will tell you the date and time of the comment. Thanks.....  casualdolly@aol.com


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 09, 2007, 06:38:20 PM
We only saw a portion of the tape of Gerald Dompig telling all in Jossy's office.

I have always wanted to see what else Dompig had to say.

Jossy probably has more than ALE since they had that little tendency to throw everything they didn't like away.



Anna,  the whole Jossy thing.....I agree,  he has been the one stronghold (dont care what others say) in this whole situation.  But alas at this point,  all I want is Natalee brought home so she can be laid to rest in the country that she was born. 


I agree, Longhaul, but in the event that is not possible or doesn't happen, some actual justice would go a long way, sotaspeak.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Blue Moon on December 09, 2007, 06:39:23 PM
ok so I screwed up the quote thing.......sorry!!!


OH another KY Monkey. I am so happy!  Welcome.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 09, 2007, 06:39:48 PM
Something else dawned on me today while away.

When Paulus was screeching "You have no jurisdiction, You have NO jurisdiction!"  I now believe he thought they were actually going to arrest Joran on the spot.  That would explain his non sequitur comment.

Instead of seeing parents desperately looking for their child, he was so short sighted and self absorbed he could only see danger for his own perfectly safe child.

.

.

Because he knows Joran is guilty. He would not have been so defensive if he didn't know that and woiould have been more concerned about a missing girl.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Blue Moon on December 09, 2007, 06:41:02 PM
(http://img225.imageshack.us/img225/5983/paulushandundertableqm7.jpg)

Maybe he's just zipping up his fly  :wink:

O.K., thought I was being cute with my comment but I did not beat Klaasend to the punch. Sorry.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 09, 2007, 06:42:08 PM
joranblog@yahoo.com is the email on the site


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 09, 2007, 06:45:38 PM
Hello.... I need a favor from the person or persons who ran the blog
joranvandersloot.blogspot.com
The blog is no longer active, however I have a post from one of the comment pages on that blog., left by an anonymous poster with broken English. The post has chilling consistencies to the latest Revelations from the prosecution. The part about wiping out evidence and spiriting away a body. This poster was trying to tell us what happened. I guess at the time the post was overlooked as there were hundreds of comments on the page.The post gave much detail ast to who and how.
........................The owner of that blog could trace the post because they had a site meter at the time. If you ran that blog please contact me, and I will tell you the date and time of the comment. Thanks.....  casualdolly@aol.com

Hi, Elaine....that blog is still available, but maybe you mean nothing new posted since early 2006? 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Elaine on December 09, 2007, 06:45:41 PM
joranblog@yahoo.com is the email on the site
Thanks, I will try that as well. AS I said that blog is no longer active, but the entire blog remains online. It hasn't been active since March 2006.... so this comment was made over a year ago. I will try that email..thanks


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: longhaul on December 09, 2007, 06:46:13 PM
Yep, another KY poster! lol   And yes Anna I agree justice would be nice, but Im sorry that I fear it wont happen as we want it too.  The island and the justice sysytem (haha) is too corrupt for that.  Such a shame. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Elaine on December 09, 2007, 06:48:35 PM
Hello.... I need a favor from the person or persons who ran the blog
joranvandersloot.blogspot.com
The blog is no longer active, however I have a post from one of the comment pages on that blog., left by an anonymous poster with broken English. The post has chilling consistencies to the latest Revelations from the prosecution. The part about wiping out evidence and spiriting away a body. This poster was trying to tell us what happened. I guess at the time the post was overlooked as there were hundreds of comments on the page.The post gave much detail ast to who and how.
........................The owner of that blog could trace the post because they had a site meter at the time. If you ran that blog please contact me, and I will tell you the date and time of the comment. Thanks.....  casualdolly@aol.com

Hi, Elaine....that blog is still available, but maybe you mean nothing new posted since early 2006? 
Hi 2NJsonsMom!, yes thats what I mean


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Elaine on December 09, 2007, 06:56:23 PM
OK, unfortunately that email account has been canceled. this is what I got:

   ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<joranblog@yahoo.com>


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 09, 2007, 06:57:20 PM
Hello.... I need a favor from the person or persons who ran the blog
joranvandersloot.blogspot.com
The blog is no longer active, however I have a post from one of the comment pages on that blog., left by an anonymous poster with broken English. The post has chilling consistencies to the latest Revelations from the prosecution. The part about wiping out evidence and spiriting away a body. This poster was trying to tell us what happened. I guess at the time the post was overlooked as there were hundreds of comments on the page.The post gave much detail ast to who and how.
........................The owner of that blog could trace the post because they had a site meter at the time. If you ran that blog please contact me, and I will tell you the date and time of the comment. Thanks.....  casualdolly@aol.com

Hi, Elaine....that blog is still available, but maybe you mean nothing new posted since early 2006? 
Hi 2NJsonsMom!, yes thats what I mean

Now you have us all wondering about that post... :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 09, 2007, 06:58:34 PM
OK, unfortunately that email account has been canceled. this is what I got:

   ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<joranblog@yahoo.com>



grrrr... :-x Oh well...it was worth a try.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Elaine on December 09, 2007, 07:07:05 PM
Hello.... I need a favor from the person or persons who ran the blog
joranvandersloot.blogspot.com
The blog is no longer active, however I have a post from one of the comment pages on that blog., left by an anonymous poster with broken English. The post has chilling consistencies to the latest Revelations from the prosecution. The part about wiping out evidence and spiriting away a body. This poster was trying to tell us what happened. I guess at the time the post was overlooked as there were hundreds of comments on the page.The post gave much detail ast to who and how.
........................The owner of that blog could trace the post because they had a site meter at the time. If you ran that blog please contact me, and I will tell you the date and time of the comment. Thanks.....  casualdolly@aol.com

Hi, Elaine....that blog is still available, but maybe you mean nothing new posted since early 2006? 
Hi 2NJsonsMom!, yes thats what I mean

Now you have us all wondering about that post... :wink:
I promise to share it soon.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 09, 2007, 07:14:26 PM
Hi to all.......and to our 'guests'.....Elaine, longhaul, Helen Back, Frank, Blue Moon of KY, Sea Searcher, Chata, AZSunny, San, private eye, Lady Devon, kkate, Leslie, tmhgolf, Noly, KarmaRoundUp and 17 Guests are viewing this topic.

OceanExploration - Welcome and I am certainly looking forward to your  posts.....

Helen - LOVE your avi

Longhaul and any new monkey I may have missed....welcome

HOLY CRAP the picture of papa pervert with his pants unzipped nearly made my fall off my chair!! I hope that is posted on the FP!!!

to any of the many RU's who read here..ask one of your good friends who claim to be close friends of the sloots to tell papa pervert he needs to wear underwear, adjust that thing and zip up!!

I am still trying to get caught up!  that picture of 'the man' beside Natalee in the casino...surely Beth knows if it is or isn't papa pervert.....would someone please ask her...I don't know if it is or it isn't...

OK...back to catching up


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Helen Back on December 09, 2007, 07:32:41 PM
GREAT front page post!  Jossy Mansur is a man of incredible courage who truly loves Aruba.  I swear that man is one of my heroes......I want a T-shirt with Jossy on it. 

I will do whatever I can to help get the truth for Natalee and Help Jossy regain his country from the liars and cowards that have taken the place over.  If these corrupt individuals are not exposed, the Arubans have no hope for their future.

God bless him!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 09, 2007, 07:33:01 PM
Elaine - the Joran Blog guy use to read Scared Monkeys all the time.  Hopefully he still does and will get back to you.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: private eye on December 09, 2007, 07:37:07 PM
(http://img225.imageshack.us/img225/5983/paulushandundertableqm7.jpg)


Kermit, maybe he is zipping his pants up :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Or worse, remember this guy is a pervert:::))))))) About a 15 year old intellectually and emotionally


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: private eye on December 09, 2007, 07:41:00 PM
ANITA THIS POST IS FOR YOU HONEY ITS A SHAME WE HAVE TO KEEP MEETING LIKE THIS BUT, I STILL HAVEN'T GOTTEN MY INVITATION TO YOUR CHISTMAS PARTY:)

While the prosecutor may choose to close his file,the Van Der Sloots, in particular Anita, need to realize that this case will never be over for her, Joran, Paulus, and her other children whom she is forcing to also live this horrible lie, until she does the right thing and tells the truth. I hope years from now, when your family is torn apart and laying in ruins from this very treatable cancer, when your children are in pain and their lives ruined from the horrible neglect you have intentionally inflicted upon them, you remember this. It didn't have to be like this, you could have stepped up to the plate and helped your family, including Joran to grow and lead valuable, productive lives, but YOU REFUSED. Beth, Matt, Mrs Reynolds, and hopefully Dave are almost healed, receiving blessings from God,and Natalee is sitting with God because they turned to God instead of away from God when faced with their loss. You who have turned from God, rejecting his instructions, haven't even hit bottom yet, you are still falling from that great height but are beginning to see your fate that rest at the bottom, and I know you know the pain is certain and will be great. The sooner you do the right thing, the shorter the road back to the top is and the less the pain suffered from the fall.

Turn the channel of life, what could have been, and you might see Joran incarcerated for a while, apparently the worst thing you think can happen to him, wrongly. Keep watching and you might see Joran befriended not by "Bubba" but by a person who knows the Lord and introduces him to the Lord, enabling Joran to grow to his full potential, become a good man, a role model for his siblings, and a great father who blesses you and your family with many grandchildren. But you don't want Joran to lose 10 years of his life in jail, I see, you would rather ruin an entire life time of his, and generations to come represented by the children he as a great man and father could have had. Oh but keep watching, remember this is the channel of good people, and who are those gracious women arguing to get Joran an early release, could it be, well it is , Beth and her mother. Is this how it would play out, I am no Simian or Shango, the Aruban voo doo schams who claim to know all but tell nothing, making them real punks in my book, but it certainly is a very real and possible outcome when 2 families come together in the truth and do the right thing despite the fact that the solution to one family appears mighty bright out the window labeled doing the wrong thing. Fools gold Anita, something you in Aruba should recognize. Your family, for generations, depends on you having the wisdom to say no to fools gold, and realizing that you never do the wrong thing when you do the right thing.

I can assure you Anita, Beth and her family are going to have a great Holiday Season and wish the same to you. But it can't begin to happen to you until you do the right thing, and while they are rooting for you, only you can make the choice to begin restoring the health of your family. Merry Christmas.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Puzzler on December 09, 2007, 07:41:24 PM
Something else dawned on me today while away.

When Paulus was screeching "You have no jurisdiction, You have NO jurisdiction!"  I now believe he thought they were actually going to arrest Joran on the spot.  That would explain his non sequitur comment.

Instead of seeing parents desperately looking for their child, he was so short sighted and self absorbed he could only see danger for his own perfectly safe child.

.

.
[/quote


Anna...good one!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: I dont feel tardy on December 09, 2007, 07:42:28 PM
that is totally Paulua at the table...add him to the list of my preference for demise. What a creep and the whole lot of them. I sincerely hope that TES finds Natalee and all the speculation and proof will be posiitve what these animals did to her and her disposal. From my mouth to GOD'S ears.
-IDFT


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on December 09, 2007, 07:51:28 PM
NEW FRONT PAGE POST:

http://scaredmonkeys.com/2007/12/09/jossy-mansur-provides-an-opinion-on-the-actions-of-aruban-prosecutor-hans-mos/

Jossy Mansur Provides an Opinion on the Actions of Aruban Prosecutor Hans Mos


Note:  be sure to read to the very end



GREAT EDITORIAL BY JOSSY!

He pegged those bastards, they are corrupt to the core and the core goes all the way to Holland.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: longhaul on December 09, 2007, 07:52:19 PM
WHINE.......I want an avitar!  Lmao 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Buckeye on December 09, 2007, 07:53:30 PM
Helen

Even before I read your "bug" comment this morning, I had come to the same conclusion.  Archer's only "forensic" tie is bug removal.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: AZSunny on December 09, 2007, 07:56:59 PM
NEW FRONT PAGE POST:

http://scaredmonkeys.com/2007/12/09/jossy-mansur-provides-an-opinion-on-the-actions-of-aruban-prosecutor-hans-mos/

Jossy Mansur Provides an Opinion on the Actions of Aruban Prosecutor Hans Mos


Note:  be sure to read to the very end

I copied and forwarded to everyone on my email list, as well as added my own very lengthy comments.  I think it is past time we all spread the word, each in our own way, to make sure the truth is heard.  I still have the boycott aruba bumper sticker on my car, with the notation find Natalee.  I am stopped periodically from some one in a mall or shopping center parking lot and asked about it.  I am more than happen to share the information I have.  Do you all stil have your car bumper stickers?  By the way, it is the first and only sticker I have ever allowed on my car. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on December 09, 2007, 07:57:24 PM
WHINE.......I want an avitar!  Lmao 

Welcome to SM, longhaul! Maybe Klaas can fix you up with an an 18 wheeler.  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Blue Moon on December 09, 2007, 07:58:49 PM
Private Eye-what a powerful letter to Anita. But you know she will accuse you of taunting her/harassing her.  But even she would have to hear these words when she sleeps, hear them when she rises each morning. She would subconsciously know what you are saying is the truth and comes from the heart.  Thanks for your way with words (even though I feel it is lost on that woman).


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: private eye on December 09, 2007, 07:59:00 PM
I am not very good with history, but wasn't it the Dutch that created a safe harbor for Pirates to store and sell their wares they gained by robbing and killing innocent shippers? Do you reckon any old Dutch money was accumulated from the spoils of this special legislation? Aren't they the largest manufacturer in the world of XTC and thus the largest exporter as well?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 09, 2007, 08:00:08 PM
WHINE.......I want an avitar!  Lmao 

I can help you with that Longhaul.  Anything in particular in mind?  Do you want it Christmasy too?  Let me know.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Blue Moon on December 09, 2007, 08:00:44 PM
WHINE.......I want an avitar!  Lmao 

Can't be the Blue Moon of KY :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on December 09, 2007, 08:03:57 PM
NEW FRONT PAGE POST:

http://scaredmonkeys.com/2007/12/09/jossy-mansur-provides-an-opinion-on-the-actions-of-aruban-prosecutor-hans-mos/

Jossy Mansur Provides an Opinion on the Actions of Aruban Prosecutor Hans Mos


Note:  be sure to read to the very end

I copied and forwarded to everyone on my email list, as well as added my own very lengthy comments.  I think it is past time we all spread the word, each in our own way, to make sure the truth is heard.  I still have the boycott aruba bumper sticker on my car, with the notation find Natalee.  I am stopped periodically from some one in a mall or shopping center parking lot and asked about it.  I am more than happen to share the information I have.  Do you all stil have your car bumper stickers?  By the way, it is the first and only sticker I have ever allowed on my car. 


Sunny, judging from chit chat around Natalee and family supporter circles I think many are poised and ready to ratchet up the boycott. Most feel the Arubans and Dutch have been given more than enough time to solve a very obvious case and have done nothing but pandered to the corrupt countrymen in their ranks.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: private eye on December 09, 2007, 08:04:30 PM
Private Eye-what a powerful letter to Anita. But you know she will accuse you of taunting her/harassing her.  But even she would have to hear these words when she sleeps, hear them when she rises each morning. She would subconsciously know what you are saying is the truth and comes from the heart.  Thanks for your way with words (even though I feel it is lost on that woman).

If I get sued or jailed for witnessing to Anita, I can live with that. I see Anita as being an extremely loving Mother, who would give her life for her family, but maybe she doesn't know what to do, is lacking in faith, maybe she is a victim of abuse and afraid, we will never know and it isn't my responsibility to know. All I know is that all I can do is speak the truth to her, try and show her the path, and offer her a hand in encouragement and comfort. That is my responsibility to my God.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on December 09, 2007, 08:08:05 PM
Private Eye-what a powerful letter to Anita. But you know she will accuse you of taunting her/harassing her.  But even she would have to hear these words when she sleeps, hear them when she rises each morning. She would subconsciously know what you are saying is the truth and comes from the heart.  Thanks for your way with words (even though I feel it is lost on that woman).


I'll second that! Great letter PI. I would have entitled it "An Open Letter to the Mother of a Family of Sociopaths".


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: longhaul on December 09, 2007, 08:08:27 PM
WHINE.......I want an avitar!  Lmao 

Welcome to SM, longhaul! Maybe Klaas can fix you up with an an 18 wheeler.  :wink:

That would work!  My hubby drives a truck and between the amount of time I have spent on this case and what he does, I find it appropriate


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Helen Back on December 09, 2007, 08:16:42 PM
Helen

Even before I read your "bug" comment this morning, I had come to the same conclusion.  Archer's only "forensic" tie is bug removal.

 :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 09, 2007, 08:21:07 PM
WHINE.......I want an avitar!  Lmao 

Welcome to SM, longhaul! Maybe Klaas can fix you up with an an 18 wheeler.  :wink:

That would work!  My hubby drives a truck and between the amount of time I have spent on this case and what he does, I find it appropriate

I set you up with the Long Haul Truck Stop until I can find something better.  Hope that's OK  :)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on December 09, 2007, 08:26:06 PM
Mos came out with guns ablazin'.

He said that he has Explosive new evidence.
He said that he had proof that Natalee was dead.
He said that the father was definately involved.
He was willing to talk.
He gave us all hope and made us believe in him. (except San)

What happened to him?  Who got to him?
Just before the Kalpoes were released he suddenly canceled
a news conference and his next interview he blamed the
family, the media and the DEA agent. He was suddenly
like a different man.

Where is the explosive new evidence? 
How did he know that the Kalpoes disposed of the body?

It is all goofy!




Magnolia, I'll tell you what's wrong with Hans Mos. He is a liar just like everybody else from Holland and Aruba who have been involved in the case.

Nadira's statement that they all lie, even the grown-ups, is spot on.

We'll see if they turn over the case file to the family after they close the case. My bet is they won't because they have to protect their lies. Jossy has them pegged, they are all in bed together, Hans Mos included.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Magnolia on December 09, 2007, 08:26:12 PM
NEW FRONT PAGE POST:

http://scaredmonkeys.com/2007/12/09/jossy-mansur-provides-an-opinion-on-the-actions-of-aruban-prosecutor-hans-mos/

Jossy Mansur Provides an Opinion on the Actions of Aruban Prosecutor Hans Mos




Jossy need the Freebirds posts......they have it all laid out in such fine order.

Note:  be sure to read to the very end



GREAT EDITORIAL BY JOSSY!

He pegged those bastards, they are corrupt to the core and the core goes all the way to Holland.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Elaine on December 09, 2007, 08:39:37 PM
Refer to the line in BOLD:

The examining magistrate says that it’s true that the current dossier of the two suspects contains serious ‘objections’ against them, but not enough to keep them longer in custody.  Custody based on the current evidence is not allowed.  This evidence was the wiping out of traces of a crime scene and the spiriting away of a body, said a spokesperson of the OM. The two brothers remain suspects of voluntary manslaughter or in any case, serious bodily harm that resulted in the death of Natalee Holloway.   

Now the post:
 
8:41 pm  anonymous said...
It was high tide and sea water covering the beach slope, Koen's boat stayed out at a distance in the water and he didn't want the boat got stuck in the beach sand dunes. Joran didn't want his shoes get wet and he took them off. He and Deepak together carried Natalee's body and walking through the water towards Koen's boat where Koen kept the boat's motor running and positioning, it was high tide and high wind, the sea waves were strong and rough. For some unknown reasons Joran got some blood into his shoes when the suspects were trying to fit Natalee's body into the
crap cage.
They might have to do some cuttings of the body in order to get all the body parts into the cage. The cage was not a coffin shape, it was square in shape, not long enough to fit a body of 5'4. So Joran put his bloody shoes into the square crab cage as well. Together the suspects dropped cage to the deepsea bottom and got rid of the forensic evidence.[b/] If Tim Miller can locate the crab cage, Joran's shoes are there. Joran is the murderer.

MATCHES.... Someone knew what happened,...This needs to be looked  into again, now that the Prosecution has given their stance.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 09, 2007, 08:43:28 PM
Refer to the line in BOLD:

The examining magistrate says that it’s true that the current dossier of the two suspects contains serious ‘objections’ against them, but not enough to keep them longer in custody.  Custody based on the current evidence is not allowed.  This evidence was the wiping out of traces of a crime scene and the spiriting away of a body, said a spokesperson of the OM. The two brothers remain suspects of voluntary manslaughter or in any case, serious bodily harm that resulted in the death of Natalee Holloway.   

Now the post:
 
8:41 pm  anonymous said...
It was high tide and sea water covering the beach slope, Koen's boat stayed out at a distance in the water and he didn't want the boat got stuck in the beach sand dunes. Joran didn't want his shoes get wet and he took them off. He and Deepak together carried Natalee's body and walking through the water towards Koen's boat where Koen kept the boat's motor running and positioning, it was high tide and high wind, the sea waves were strong and rough. For some unknown reasons Joran got some blood into his shoes when the suspects were trying to fit Natalee's body into the
crap cage.
They might have to do some cuttings of the body in order to get all the body parts into the cage. The cage was not a coffin shape, it was square in shape, not long enough to fit a body of 5'4. So Joran put his bloody shoes into the square crab cage as well. Together the suspects dropped cage to the deepsea bottom and got rid of the forensic evidence.[b/] If Tim Miller can locate the crab cage, Joran's shoes are there. Joran is the murderer.
MATCHES.... Someone knew what happened,...This needs to be looked  into again, now that the Prosecution has given their stance.




Yes, I remember this post and agree.  I hope the Joran Blog guy is reading here and contacts someone about it. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Elaine on December 09, 2007, 08:48:23 PM
Refer to the line in BOLD:

The examining magistrate says that it’s true that the current dossier of the two suspects contains serious ‘objections’ against them, but not enough to keep them longer in custody.  Custody based on the current evidence is not allowed.  This evidence was the wiping out of traces of a crime scene and the spiriting away of a body, said a spokesperson of the OM. The two brothers remain suspects of voluntary manslaughter or in any case, serious bodily harm that resulted in the death of Natalee Holloway.   

Now the post:
 
8:41 pm  anonymous said...
It was high tide and sea water covering the beach slope, Koen's boat stayed out at a distance in the water and he didn't want the boat got stuck in the beach sand dunes. Joran didn't want his shoes get wet and he took them off. He and Deepak together carried Natalee's body and walking through the water towards Koen's boat where Koen kept the boat's motor running and positioning, it was high tide and high wind, the sea waves were strong and rough. For some unknown reasons Joran got some blood into his shoes when the suspects were trying to fit Natalee's body into the
crap cage.
They might have to do some cuttings of the body in order to get all the body parts into the cage. The cage was not a coffin shape, it was square in shape, not long enough to fit a body of 5'4. So Joran put his bloody shoes into the square crab cage as well. Together the suspects dropped cage to the deepsea bottom and got rid of the forensic evidence.[b/] If Tim Miller can locate the crab cage, Joran's shoes are there. Joran is the murderer.
MATCHES.... Someone knew what happened,...This needs to be looked  into again, now that the Prosecution has given their stance.




Yes, I remember this post and agree.  I hope the Joran Blog guy is reading here and contacts someone about it. 
Klass, very Erie huh?!! Everyone pray for Tim and the searchers to find what they need.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: AZSunny on December 09, 2007, 08:49:14 PM
Refer to the line in BOLD:

The examining magistrate says that it’s true that the current dossier of the two suspects contains serious ‘objections’ against them, but not enough to keep them longer in custody.  Custody based on the current evidence is not allowed.  This evidence was the wiping out of traces of a crime scene and the spiriting away of a body, said a spokesperson of the OM. The two brothers remain suspects of voluntary manslaughter or in any case, serious bodily harm that resulted in the death of Natalee Holloway.   

Now the post:
 
8:41 pm  anonymous said...
It was high tide and sea water covering the beach slope, Koen's boat stayed out at a distance in the water and he didn't want the boat got stuck in the beach sand dunes. Joran didn't want his shoes get wet and he took them off. He and Deepak together carried Natalee's body and walking through the water towards Koen's boat where Koen kept the boat's motor running and positioning, it was high tide and high wind, the sea waves were strong and rough. For some unknown reasons Joran got some blood into his shoes when the suspects were trying to fit Natalee's body into the
crap cage.
They might have to do some cuttings of the body in order to get all the body parts into the cage. The cage was not a coffin shape, it was square in shape, not long enough to fit a body of 5'4. So Joran put his bloody shoes into the square crab cage as well. Together the suspects dropped cage to the deepsea bottom and got rid of the forensic evidence.[b/] If Tim Miller can locate the crab cage, Joran's shoes are there. Joran is the murderer.
MATCHES.... Someone knew what happened,...This needs to be looked  into again, now that the Prosecution has given their stance.




Yes, I remember this post and agree.  I hope the Joran Blog guy is reading here and contacts someone about it. 
When was this posted?  date?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Elaine on December 09, 2007, 08:55:05 PM
 http://joranvandersloot.blogspot.com/2006/02/joran-goes-on-record-we-just-got-back.html
  March 2006....at 8:41 Pm


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Elaine on December 09, 2007, 09:01:48 PM
http://joranvandersloot.blogspot.com/2006/02/joran-goes-on-record-we-just-got-back.html
  March 2006....at 8:41 Pm
I just wanna say once you go to that page scroll way down near the bottom to see it, as there are hundreds of posts on there,from several days...scroll way down


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: private eye on December 09, 2007, 09:05:23 PM
Maybe in addition to the reward for information, maybe she should approach the FBI about agreeing to allow the person with the info to enter their program with their reward money if they are so afraid of someone over there, just kidding, but to keep an entire island quite requires a very deep level of fear


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: longhaul on December 09, 2007, 09:06:28 PM
Works for me!  Funny thing is that I have I have been all over this country and missing persons has always caught my eye. The avitar is fitting.  Had one once on another sight that was an 18 wheeler with an angel on the side.  People forget that truckers can be a positive influence in missing persons due to the territory that we cover.  (and yes, I went every where with him before we had kids)  We aren't all bad like were portrayed on TV.

The Persistence  is our one hope now,  we have to keep our eyes on her, and send Prayers and positive light her way. 

Thanks for the avi!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: private eye on December 09, 2007, 09:07:31 PM
Excuse me quiet not quite


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 09, 2007, 09:09:29 PM
http://joranvandersloot.blogspot.com/2006/02/joran-goes-on-record-we-just-got-back.html
  March 2006....at 8:41 Pm
I just wanna say once you go to that page scroll way down near the bottom to see it, as there are hundreds of posts on there,from several days...scroll way down

That's right around the time he/she stopped updating the blog.  The comment section was left open for a long time.  Shoot, you can probably still comment on it now unless comments are moderated. But as far as new posts on the blog they stopped around March 2006.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: wreck on December 09, 2007, 09:15:10 PM
Refer to the line in BOLD:

The examining magistrate says that it’s true that the current dossier of the two suspects contains serious ‘objections’ against them, but not enough to keep them longer in custody.  Custody based on the current evidence is not allowed.  This evidence was the wiping out of traces of a crime scene and the spiriting away of a body, said a spokesperson of the OM. The two brothers remain suspects of voluntary manslaughter or in any case, serious bodily harm that resulted in the death of Natalee Holloway.   

Now the post:
 
8:41 pm  anonymous said...
It was high tide and sea water covering the beach slope, Koen's boat stayed out at a distance in the water and he didn't want the boat got stuck in the beach sand dunes. Joran didn't want his shoes get wet and he took them off. He and Deepak together carried Natalee's body and walking through the water towards Koen's boat where Koen kept the boat's motor running and positioning, it was high tide and high wind, the sea waves were strong and rough. For some unknown reasons Joran got some blood into his shoes when the suspects were trying to fit Natalee's body into the
crap cage.
They might have to do some cuttings of the body in order to get all the body parts into the cage. The cage was not a coffin shape, it was square in shape, not long enough to fit a body of 5'4. So Joran put his bloody shoes into the square crab cage as well. Together the suspects dropped cage to the deepsea bottom and got rid of the forensic evidence.[b/] If Tim Miller can locate the crab cage, Joran's shoes are there. Joran is the murderer.
MATCHES.... Someone knew what happened,...This needs to be looked  into again, now that the Prosecution has given their stance.




Yes, I remember this post and agree.  I hope the Joran Blog guy is reading here and contacts someone about it. 
When was this posted?  date?
I have been away all day ( crazy Cowboy victory) -- but what the hell is this from???? It is the lynch-peg of this case!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: IBE on December 09, 2007, 09:18:11 PM
Klaas... am posting in Musings a question about satellite searching you did for the missing pilot in NV and if it can be accessed for all areas


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: longhaul on December 09, 2007, 09:30:29 PM
WRECK. My kids love the trains! KABOOM as they say when they hit one another!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: robots on December 09, 2007, 09:33:59 PM
i find the post interesting but im not sure i believe it.

its certainly possible.. but i think she is on land


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: robots on December 09, 2007, 09:35:14 PM
seems very possible but im not sure it could have happened that same night

i guess it could have....but


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: San on December 09, 2007, 09:35:39 PM
i find the post interesting but im not sure i believe it.

its certainly possible.. but i think she is on land


I agree robots.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Blue Moon on December 09, 2007, 09:36:29 PM
i find the post interesting but im not sure i believe it.

its certainly possible.. but i think she is on land


Read the comment under Jossy's article on the front page from Evilive.  Is is very interesting.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: robots on December 09, 2007, 09:42:01 PM
if the killers knew the body was in the water they would be STOPPING all the chances of the ship going to search...

even Mos would be out there with a SIGN that says NO BOATS ALLOWED


nawwwwwwwww... now if the ship gets there and the ALE does not let the boat search... then i wil reconsider

dont get me wrong, the searchers are GREAT, but might be just what Aruba wants
a search to turn up nothing..
then again, because it is an unknown. it needs to be done



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: robots on December 09, 2007, 09:42:40 PM
i find the post interesting but im not sure i believe it.

its certainly possible.. but i think she is on land


I agree robots.


 :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: robots on December 09, 2007, 09:44:10 PM
i find the post interesting but im not sure i believe it.

its certainly possible.. but i think she is on land


Read the comment under Jossy's article on the front page from Evilive.  Is is very interesting.
yes    ty


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: San on December 09, 2007, 09:44:19 PM
i find the post interesting but im not sure i believe it.

its certainly possible.. but i think she is on land


Read the comment under Jossy's article on the front page from Evilive.  Is is very interesting.

From the front page:

evilive on December 9th, 2007 9:57 pm
I wonder how Alexander Gottenbos got a green card so fast to work in the USA.
Jacobs says that Americans came to Aruba and commit insurance fraud. What a twist!!! Is he working here illegally or just working the welfare system in Georgia? Here is an Aruban insurance agent possibly commiting fraud in the United States.
Why did he sell his home so abruptly and leave Aruba?
His wife had a good business there also.
Bed wetting. Bed wetters usually grow out the problem by the age of 10. When an adolescent starts it is usually some physical problem that needs immediate attention. Or; some trauma or neurological problem surfaced. Keon should be up to number two by now. Sander; did you really have your phone stolen or was someone trying to defend herself and it was grabbed and broken when she was struck with it? Was this before or after her hair was cut?
Every lead focused nowhere near the crime scene. All searches at the van Der Sloots would turn up nothing except maybe Anita’s camera with pictures of a defenseless young injured and drugged American blond tourist.
Did the Gottenbos’ buy any mattresses in June of 2005. Or; since they better flee the island they did not bother.
Boy I would not want Willeim Van Cromvoirt as a father. He disowned his son and fired him so as to distance himself from any possible prosecution. Bad as it was at least Paulus defended his son. Or was Geoff’s crime worse. He couldn’t take the name of Natalee Holloway when her name was mentioned and seemed to go into a catatonic state of mind.
He had to get rid of his pick up.
But here again Geoff’s father is a Dutch national fleeing the island. Sells his business and flees. I guess he couldn’t explain the hidden cameras in the guests’ rooms so they had to be renovated while the cameras were removed. Anyone remember the video of Geoff’s arrest. He had what appeared to be wearing a black hooded VCB uniform.
Why was van der Straaten removed from the case? Believe it or not he may have been a good guy and the Prime Minister fired him rather than offing him. Besides he was ready to retire anyway and who would believe an alcoholic.
Dirty hand was in all probability DJ
Here we have Guido; Flees shortly after Natalee disappears. The ones’ that toss the dice; they knew about the skimming going on at the blackjack tables.
Why doesn’t Deepak leave? Why leave a good business. That is a direct line to web sights and all the dirty films that Freddy makes of drugged tourist sells big on the cybernet.
It’s called supplemental income.
While we are on supplemental income; did Joran ever pay New York State and New York City income tax for is TV appearance. At the very least as a guest it would have been around $500.00. I believe that would be around $70.00 as a non resident.
What about Joran’s girlfriend at the time Natalee disappeared. No mention of a dark skinned, dark hair brown eyed Aruban in his book. But Joran has to team up with Fabien just so everyone knows he really likes blonds. But then again why Natalee; he said he liked Ruth better; but then again he and Guido were also pretty close.
BTW why not the mineshafts? Think about it. Yes Keon had a boat available but think about it if you agree on the ocean theory. Did they bring the boat to Natalee or did they bring Natalee to the boat or was the boat and Natalee already at the same location in Malmok.
The mines are just a little out of the way on the way back to either Paradera or Hooiberg.
Less then two and one half miles. No extra charge for gas as in the case of a boat.
There are some flaws in 10061906 post but I can follow the thought process.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: longhaul on December 09, 2007, 09:47:43 PM
i find the post interesting but im not sure i believe it.

its certainly possible.. but i think she is on land


Read the comment under Jossy's article on the front page from Evilive.  Is is very interesting.
yes    ty


Read that  earlier and I agree, but then again I also find some truth in what Simian and Shango said too. Call me crazy, but I wish I had the brain power that Lala's has. Those "riddles" mean something to me, wish I could unscramble them the way she does.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Noly on December 09, 2007, 09:47:45 PM
Looks like Natalee is the #1 most shocking unsolved crime on E!

JonBenet is #2

Are any of you watching it?  They're showing JonBenet right now


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: robots on December 09, 2007, 09:50:24 PM
justice delayed IS justice DENIED

usually its the ass defense atty's saying it

well, put that in crack pipe and smoke it  :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 09, 2007, 09:51:07 PM
I liked what privtae eye posted to Anita, but I do not think Anita is in a listerning phase. The Sloots see their jobs as protecting Joran to end of their days.
Joran will go back to Holland and find some cesspool to live in and never amount to anything, no matter what Anita does. She has no infuence over him. The Sloots probably thought that this would have all blown over by now and that Joran would be in school, graduating by now with honors and making a nice career for himself. Making the family proud. He won't ever do that and she does not realize that yet.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Blue Moon on December 09, 2007, 09:51:29 PM
i find the post interesting but im not sure i believe it.

its certainly possible.. but i think she is on land


Read the comment under Jossy's article on the front page from Evilive.  Is is very interesting.
yes    ty


Read that  earlier and I agree, but then again I also find some truth in what Simian and Shango said too. Call me crazy, but I wish I had the brain power that Lala's has. Those "riddles" mean something to me, wish I could unscramble them the way she does.

I agree on that. I get very confused with those riddles. Lala's really gets into them and can make so much sense from it.  I thought I noticed a little Shango in that post and am wondering if Lala's did herself.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Noly on December 09, 2007, 09:53:36 PM
i find the post interesting but im not sure i believe it.

its certainly possible.. but i think she is on land


I agree robots.

Me too.  I've always thought that.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 09, 2007, 09:56:21 PM
Looks like Natalee is the #1 most shocking unsolved crime on E!

JonBenet is #2

Are any of you watching it?  They're showing JonBenet right now

I wouldn't even what channel it's on here, LOL.  I've never watched the show before and I can guarantee you my husband wouldn't stop watching his football game for it, LOL.

Let us know how it is please, TIA.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: robots on December 09, 2007, 09:57:00 PM
i find the post interesting but im not sure i believe it.

its certainly possible.. but i think she is on land


I agree robots.

Me too.  I've always thought that.

hi noly, im not going to throw out the possibility of a boat but it seems like
then you have too many people involved... ummmm im not sure but that is what it seems to me..
land fill - seems much less complicated - especially when you have people not allowing you to search that area  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: AZSunny on December 09, 2007, 09:57:31 PM
I liked what privtae eye posted to Anita, but I do not think Anita is in a listerning phase. The Sloots see their jobs as protecting Joran to end of their days.
Joran will go back to Holland and find some cesspool to live in and never amount to anything, no matter what Anita does. She has no infuence over him. The Sloots probably thought that this would have all blown over by now and that Joran would be in school, graduating by now with honors and making a nice career for himself. Making the family proud. He won't ever do that and she does not realize that yet.

And from what we have been "told", Anita is a Buddist.  I don't think she ever practiced any religion. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: longhaul on December 09, 2007, 09:58:30 PM
i find the post interesting but im not sure i believe it.

its certainly possible.. but i think she is on land




Gosh me too Blue, Im just one of those High Tech Rednecks, and get sucked into this kind of stuff.  However,  I do think Nat is in the water. If they find her or not,  I dont know how I feel. I want them too,  but at the same time, I have to be resonable and say "It aint gonna happen".  Really, really, really want to be wrong tho!!! 
Read the comment under Jossy's article on the front page from Evilive.  Is is very interesting.
yes    ty


Read that  earlier and I agree, but then again I also find some truth in what Simian and Shango said too. Call me crazy, but I wish I had the brain power that Lala's has. Those "riddles" mean something to me, wish I could unscramble them the way she does.

I agree on that. I get very confused with those riddles. Lala's really gets into them and can make so much sense from it.  I thought I noticed a little Shango in that post and am wondering if Lala's did herself.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: dennisintn on December 09, 2007, 10:01:10 PM
i find the post interesting but im not sure i believe it.

its certainly possible.. but i think she is on land


robots, anything is possible, except what they tell you happened.  with the exception of jossy, is there anyone we've been exposed to on the happy island who hasn't proven to be a liar?
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Blue Moon on December 09, 2007, 10:07:21 PM
I think and believe that in order for this to go any further that the GOOD people of Aruba has to get off their duff's and get involved in this and demand justice not only for Natalee but also for themselves. Sitting back and keeping their mouths shut is not the answer to this problem.  Maybe Jossy needs to rally the people of the island around him and demand an accounting of the goings-on on the island.  If the people cannot rally around then this case is lost.  Mos cannot do it on his own.  It has to be in the interest of the people and that island.  I am so sick of the same old saying "but this will hurt the innocent people of Aruba who had nothing to do with this".  Or "all the people involved are not even Arubans".  If they are not going to be a part of this solution then they are the problem along with the government and judges and the Sloots and Kalpoes.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 09, 2007, 10:08:42 PM
i find the post interesting but im not sure i believe it.

its certainly possible.. but i think she is on land


robots, anything is possible, except what they tell you happened.  with the exception of jossy, is there anyone we've been exposed to on the happy island who hasn't proven to be a liar?
dennisintn


Worse yet, you'd think anyone from Aruba would know the difference in a fish trap and a crab trap.  Size for example.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: robots on December 09, 2007, 10:19:07 PM
i find the post interesting but im not sure i believe it.

its certainly possible.. but i think she is on land


robots, anything is possible, except what they tell you happened.  with the exception of jossy, is there anyone we've been exposed to on the happy island who hasn't proven to be a liar?
dennisintn

yes


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 09, 2007, 10:21:32 PM
Refer to the line in BOLD:

The examining magistrate says that it’s true that the current dossier of the two suspects contains serious ‘objections’ against them, but not enough to keep them longer in custody.  Custody based on the current evidence is not allowed.  This evidence was the wiping out of traces of a crime scene and the spiriting away of a body, said a spokesperson of the OM. The two brothers remain suspects of voluntary manslaughter or in any case, serious bodily harm that resulted in the death of Natalee Holloway.   

Now the post:
 
8:41 pm  anonymous said...
It was high tide and sea water covering the beach slope, Koen's boat stayed out at a distance in the water and he didn't want the boat got stuck in the beach sand dunes. Joran didn't want his shoes get wet and he took them off. He and Deepak together carried Natalee's body and walking through the water towards Koen's boat where Koen kept the boat's motor running and positioning, it was high tide and high wind, the sea waves were strong and rough. For some unknown reasons Joran got some blood into his shoes when the suspects were trying to fit Natalee's body into the
crap cage.
They might have to do some cuttings of the body in order to get all the body parts into the cage. The cage was not a coffin shape, it was square in shape, not long enough to fit a body of 5'4. So Joran put his bloody shoes into the square crab cage as well. Together the suspects dropped cage to the deepsea bottom and got rid of the forensic evidence.[b/] If Tim Miller can locate the crab cage, Joran's shoes are there. Joran is the murderer.

MATCHES.... Someone knew what happened,...This needs to be looked  into again, now that the Prosecution has given their stance.




And where you find Natalee and Joran's shoes you will also find Sanders' phone.  Remember, his phone was not lost, it was stolen according to him.  Also keep in mind that the IM's between Deepak and Joran that night (early morning) were not in the order of a conversation, rather three IM's in a row by Deepak then three IM's in a row by Joran.  They each used Sanders' phone to send IM's through their computers.  That's why Satish was at home on Deepak's and Val was up at 2.30 am on the Sloot computer.  That is what the early morning phone all was about.  Joran had to get someone up and on their computer and Val's email is the one that was accessed at that time

I wish Mos or somebody would pull the phone records for that phone and see how tis was done and where the pings show up.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Magnolia on December 09, 2007, 10:29:37 PM
Looks like Natalee is the #1 most shocking unsolved crime on E!

JonBenet is #2

Are any of you watching it?  They're showing JonBenet right now

I heard people discussing Natalee at church this morning.
I stopped by the grocery store and heard people discussing
Natalee in the check out line
I had dinner with eight cousins and it was all the talk at
the dinner table.
People that I would have never thought followed the case
had considerable knowledge of the facts.
I was quite amazed.
Everyone was upset that the 3 perps had been released again.
Mos may have shot tourism right between the eyes.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: San on December 09, 2007, 10:31:26 PM
WTF???  I'm gone for a few hours and come back to see this??? I'm still back on page 5..will catch up in a minute. :shock: :shock:  :lol:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/pvdszipper.gif)

I was looking back in the thread and looked at this picture again and I wanted to point out the sweat outline on Paulus shirt  :puker: :puker: :puker:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Scandi on December 09, 2007, 10:39:25 PM
Hi to All,  WOW. that post was really something!  Thanks for that Elaine.  I also found this post that talks about the stars. and it is kind of a Perry Mason clue, but certainly makes sense.  He talks about the fact Natalee wanted to see the stars but there were no stars out, unless you were about 2 miles out in the ocean! 

"Anonymous said...

    The Aruba weather report on May 30, 2005 will nail a coffin nail right into Joran's head. Hope somebody expert can get some satellite Aruba weather images on May 30, 2005. Then we can precisely locate where Joran was at 4:00 PM that same night. I figured that the Mariott beach is at NE of the island, the weather station is at the southern tip
    of the island, and the cloud pattern was moving diagonally from the NE to the South. So the weather report indicated that the Mariott beach was under overcast clouds, and there was no way for Natalee to see any starry stars in the sky. Joran had to be out 2 miles off the beach into the ocean to be able to see some stars. That stars confession of Joran tells me he is guilty of murder and of disposing Natalee's body into the ocean.
    2:38 PM


Pretty interesting, but I wonder how reliable it is.  Are there many posters that use the nik Anonymous, as their writing styles vary.   Do you think Mos knows about this post?  Or the search crew?  I just can't see them coming 1700 miles on blind faith without something to give them a real clue.  If she was put say 2 miles out, they would be able to calculate how the cage might have drifted after all this time, right?  Probably back and forth as most things in the ocean do.  I wonder how wide a swatch they will search by grid?

I WONDER everything!  Don't mind me.  ;}


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: wreck on December 09, 2007, 10:44:42 PM
Hi to All,  WOW. that post was really something!  Thanks for that Elaine.  I also found this post that talks about the stars. and it is kind of a Perry Mason clue, but certainly makes sense.  He talks about the fact Natalee wanted to see the stars but there were no stars out, unless you were about 2 miles out in the ocean! 

"Anonymous said...

    The Aruba weather report on May 30, 2005 will nail a coffin nail right into Joran's head. Hope somebody expert can get some satellite Aruba weather images on May 30, 2005. Then we can precisely locate where Joran was at 4:00 PM that same night. I figured that the Mariott beach is at NE of the island, the weather station is at the southern tip
    of the island, and the cloud pattern was moving diagonally from the NE to the South. So the weather report indicated that the Mariott beach was under overcast clouds, and there was no way for Natalee to see any starry stars in the sky. Joran had to be out 2 miles off the beach into the ocean to be able to see some stars. That stars confession of Joran tells me he is guilty of murder and of disposing Natalee's body into the ocean.
    2:38 PM


Pretty interesting, but I wonder how reliable it is.  Are there many posters that use the nik Anonymous, as their writing styles vary.   Do you think Mos knows about this post?  Or the search crew?  I just can't see them coming 1700 miles on blind faith without something to give them a real clue.  If she was put say 2 miles out, they would be able to calculate how the cage might have drifted after all this time, right?  Probably back and forth as most things in the ocean do.  I wonder how wide a swatch they will search by grid?

I WONDER everything!  Don't mind me.  ;}
Think "Hodges" -- "thought prints" -- she is at sea where the ship is searching. (robots and  san -- pay heed)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: robots on December 09, 2007, 10:44:55 PM
WTF???  I'm gone for a few hours and come back to see this??? I'm still back on page 5..will catch up in a minute. :shock: :shock:  :lol:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/pvdszipper.gif)

I was looking back in the thread and looked at this picture again and I wanted to point out the sweat outline on Paulus shirt  :puker: :puker: :puker:
:cool: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: robots on December 09, 2007, 10:46:12 PM
Hi to All,  WOW. that post was really something!  Thanks for that Elaine.  I also found this post that talks about the stars. and it is kind of a Perry Mason clue, but certainly makes sense.  He talks about the fact Natalee wanted to see the stars but there were no stars out, unless you were about 2 miles out in the ocean! 

"Anonymous said...

    The Aruba weather report on May 30, 2005 will nail a coffin nail right into Joran's head. Hope somebody expert can get some satellite Aruba weather images on May 30, 2005. Then we can precisely locate where Joran was at 4:00 PM that same night. I figured that the Mariott beach is at NE of the island, the weather station is at the southern tip
    of the island, and the cloud pattern was moving diagonally from the NE to the South. So the weather report indicated that the Mariott beach was under overcast clouds, and there was no way for Natalee to see any starry stars in the sky. Joran had to be out 2 miles off the beach into the ocean to be able to see some stars. That stars confession of Joran tells me he is guilty of murder and of disposing Natalee's body into the ocean.
    2:38 PM


Pretty interesting, but I wonder how reliable it is.  Are there many posters that use the nik Anonymous, as their writing styles vary.   Do you think Mos knows about this post?  Or the search crew?  I just can't see them coming 1700 miles on blind faith without something to give them a real clue.  If she was put say 2 miles out, they would be able to calculate how the cage might have drifted after all this time, right?  Probably back and forth as most things in the ocean do.  I wonder how wide a swatch they will search by grid?

I WONDER everything!  Don't mind me.  ;}
Think "Hodges" -- "thought prints" -- she is at sea where the ship is searching. (robots and  san -- pay heed)
that could be  :cool: :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: oceanexploration on December 09, 2007, 10:46:44 PM
Well this is all fascintating.  You're getting me all worked up.  I fly on Wed. to Aruba


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Blue Moon on December 09, 2007, 10:49:02 PM
Well this is all fascintating.  You're getting me all worked up.  I fly on Wed. to Aruba

That is great news.  Will Aruba have any problems with your flying there to meet the ship?  I sure hope they do not give you any problems.

Good luck and we are all praying for you and Natalee.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Helen Back on December 09, 2007, 10:50:48 PM
Refer to the line in BOLD:

The examining magistrate says that it’s true that the current dossier of the two suspects contains serious ‘objections’ against them, but not enough to keep them longer in custody.  Custody based on the current evidence is not allowed.  This evidence was the wiping out of traces of a crime scene and the spiriting away of a body, said a spokesperson of the OM. The two brothers remain suspects of voluntary manslaughter or in any case, serious bodily harm that resulted in the death of Natalee Holloway.   

Now the post:
 
8:41 pm  anonymous said...
It was high tide and sea water covering the beach slope, Koen's boat stayed out at a distance in the water and he didn't want the boat got stuck in the beach sand dunes. Joran didn't want his shoes get wet and he took them off. He and Deepak together carried Natalee's body and walking through the water towards Koen's boat where Koen kept the boat's motor running and positioning, it was high tide and high wind, the sea waves were strong and rough. For some unknown reasons Joran got some blood into his shoes when the suspects were trying to fit Natalee's body into the
crap cage.
They might have to do some cuttings of the body in order to get all the body parts into the cage. The cage was not a coffin shape, it was square in shape, not long enough to fit a body of 5'4. So Joran put his bloody shoes into the square crab cage as well. Together the suspects dropped cage to the deepsea bottom and got rid of the forensic evidence.[b/] If Tim Miller can locate the crab cage, Joran's shoes are there. Joran is the murderer.

MATCHES.... Someone knew what happened,...This needs to be looked  into again, now that the Prosecution has given their stance.




And where you find Natalee and Joran's shoes you will also find Sanders' phone.  Remember, his phone was not lost, it was stolen according to him.  Also keep in mind that the IM's between Deepak and Joran that night (early morning) were not in the order of a conversation, rather three IM's in a row by Deepak then three IM's in a row by Joran.  They each used Sanders' phone to send IM's through their computers.  That's why Satish was at home on Deepak's and Val was up at 2.30 am on the Sloot computer.  That is what the early morning phone all was about.  Joran had to get someone up and on their computer and Val's email is the one that was accessed at that time

I wish Mos or somebody would pull the phone records for that phone and see how tis was done and where the pings show up.

I don't know much about cell phones, but hopefully someone here does. Here's an article I clipped in trying to learn more:

Cell phone users, beware.  The FBI can listen to everything you say, even when the cell phone is turned off.

A recent court ruling in a case against the Genovese crime family revealed that the FBI has the ability from a remote location to activate a cell phone and turn its microphone into a listening device that transmits to an FBI listening post, a method known as a "roving bug."  Experts say the only way to defeat it is to remove the cell phone battery.

"The FBI can access cell phones and modify them remotely without ever having to physically handle them," James Atkinson, a counterintelligence security consultant, told ABC News.  "Any recently manufactured cell phone has a built-in tracking device, which can allow eavesdroppers to pinpoint someone's location to within just a few feet," he added.
   
According to the recent court ruling by U.S. District Court Judge Lewis Kaplan, "The device functioned whether the phone was powered on or off, intercepting conversations within its range wherever it happened to be."   

http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2006/12/can_you_hear_me.html

 :shock:



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: wreck on December 09, 2007, 10:50:51 PM
Well this is all fascintating.  You're getting me all worked up.  I fly on Wed. to Aruba
GODSPEED! :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: oceanexploration on December 09, 2007, 10:52:49 PM
They've been cooperative, helpful, and wonderful from what I gather.  I'll try to post an update Wed night on the blog.
http://nholloway.blogspot.com (http://nholloway.blogspot.com)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Helen Back on December 09, 2007, 10:54:38 PM
Well this is all fascintating.  You're getting me all worked up.  I fly on Wed. to Aruba
GODSPEED! :cool:

Yes, Godspeed!  We'll be with you in Spirit. :)





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 09, 2007, 10:55:42 PM
Well this is all fascintating.  You're getting me all worked up.  I fly on Wed. to Aruba

Very cool Oceanexp - have a safe flight!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 09, 2007, 10:58:46 PM
They've been cooperative, helpful, and wonderful from what I gather.  I'll try to post an update Wed night on the blog.
http://nholloway.blogspot.com (http://nholloway.blogspot.com)


Excellent, thanks!  Suggeston, stay away from Julia Renfro when you are in Aruba.   :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Helen Back on December 09, 2007, 11:02:13 PM
They've been cooperative, helpful, and wonderful from what I gather.  I'll try to post an update Wed night on the blog.
http://nholloway.blogspot.com (http://nholloway.blogspot.com)


Excellent, thanks!  Suggeston, stay away from Julia Renfro when you are in Aruba.   :wink:

for so many reasons.   :lol:




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: wreck on December 09, 2007, 11:03:45 PM
WTF???  I'm gone for a few hours and come back to see this??? I'm still back on page 5..will catch up in a minute. :shock: :shock:  :lol:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/pvdszipper.gif)

I was looking back in the thread and looked at this picture again and I wanted to point out the sweat outline on Paulus shirt  :puker: :puker: :puker:
:cool: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:
I missed "Mr. Humidity's" sweat as well . He looks like the cat the swallowed the canary.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: robots on December 09, 2007, 11:04:54 PM
what aruba and the dutch want us to believe is about as silly as the magic bullet theory

LOAD after LOAD


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: robots on December 09, 2007, 11:06:07 PM
paulus looks like he needs a treadmill

do they have them in prison ?? :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Frank on December 09, 2007, 11:06:41 PM
Oceanexploration,

If something is found, where do you intend to go? Certainly not to Aruba?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: yapperz1 on December 09, 2007, 11:08:34 PM
Hiya Monkeys. I have been reading & following the latest BS. Did we really expect anything close to justice from Rick Smid?


Also:
Anna wrote:
Worse yet, you'd think anyone from Aruba would know the difference in a fish trap and a crab trap.  Size for example.

Anna, I would have doubts that some "teens/kid" would know the difference in the type of trap UNLESS there were fishermen in the family. JMO



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: wreck on December 09, 2007, 11:09:26 PM
Oceanexploration,

If something is found, where do you intend to go? Certainly not to Aruba?
Go directly to the U.S.A. -- Do not pass Aruba -- do not pay $200.00


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Helen Back on December 09, 2007, 11:11:03 PM
what aruba and the dutch want us to believe is about as silly as the magic bullet theory

LOAD after LOAD

Right.  So who here believes that the whole island, the justice dept., minister, prime minister, the crooked judges, all are protecting J2K?

IMO, they would like for us to believe this is all about Joran and the Kalpoes.  And yes, they kidnapped Natalee and God knows what the truth is after that.  But it's a big stretch for me to believe that all of this is to protect some lil' thugs.  Paulus and others are the ones really being protected, IMO.  Hopefully, Jossy is ready to let out some of what he has been holding back and that will help connect the whole story.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: robots on December 09, 2007, 11:15:06 PM
what aruba and the dutch want us to believe is about as silly as the magic bullet theory

LOAD after LOAD

Right.  So who here believes that the whole island, the justice dept., minister, prime minister, the crooked judges, all are protecting J2K?

IMO, they would like for us to believe this is all about Joran and the Kalpoes.  And yes, they kidnapped Natalee and God knows what the truth is after that.  But it's a big stretch for me to believe that all of this is to protect some lil' thugs.  Paulus and others are the ones really being protected, IMO.  Hopefully, Jossy is ready to let out some of what he has been holding back and that will help connect the whole story.



yes, it goes something like this

paulus says to people," if you my is son convicted, i will tell and report on JOE and then JOE will report on JOHN and JOHN will report on JAMES and etc etc etc

i said it a couple weeks ago, these punks were making movies and the parents ( fathers)
knew about it and may have been involved. they were raping, stealing, and selling the movies, drugging people etc etc etc .. it is horrible and if one SQUEALS everyone goes down

so, they are protecting each other....

its a mess 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: mrs. red on December 09, 2007, 11:18:41 PM
i find the post interesting but im not sure i believe it.

its certainly possible.. but i think she is on land


I agree robots.


Me too.  I've always thought that.

hi noly, im not going to throw out the possibility of a boat but it seems like
then you have too many people involved... ummmm im not sure but that is what it seems to me..
land fill - seems much less complicated - especially when you have people not allowing you to search that area  :wink:

that freaking landfill is/was toxic too... red has a huge scar from that place... like a chemical burn...

and then Julia the evil bitch, came on here and laughed about how they told them the landfill didn't have anything...etc.  Tim, Dave, eveyONE was sick after that landfill was  searched... of course for it only to be filled in and set fire to...

I fear that is where they hid Natalee.... but I want to be wrong and them find her in the ocean....


and I still say there are no innocent arubans because someone, somewhere knows and just won't say....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Magnolia on December 09, 2007, 11:19:16 PM
WTF???  I'm gone for a few hours and come back to see this??? I'm still back on page 5..will catch up in a minute. :shock: :shock:  :lol:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/pvdszipper.gif)

I was looking back in the thread and looked at this picture again and I wanted to point out the sweat outline on Paulus shirt  :puker: :puker: :puker:
:cool: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:

Eewwwwww, I didn't notice his baggage before.  :shock: :shock:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: mrs. red on December 09, 2007, 11:23:24 PM
oh.. I hit post too soon... anyway with that rant, I agree it's way more than just these three little assbites.... it's way more, and the more i hear about that hateful island, the more sure I become.

After all, this island was the one where a girl was raped at school... gang raped actually and they filmed it and SHE is the one that was "tainted"

F@#$ that... if that were my daughter (which btw, they were so worried about feeding their daughters and God daughters, as I recall) I would so have killed the little punks that did that to her..... there would not be any baloney about HER being tainted,

rant over :2brickwall: :oops: :evil:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Helen Back on December 09, 2007, 11:26:18 PM
what aruba and the dutch want us to believe is about as silly as the magic bullet theory

LOAD after LOAD

Right.  So who here believes that the whole island, the justice dept., minister, prime minister, the crooked judges, all are protecting J2K?

IMO, they would like for us to believe this is all about Joran and the Kalpoes.  And yes, they kidnapped Natalee and God knows what the truth is after that.  But it's a big stretch for me to believe that all of this is to protect some lil' thugs.  Paulus and others are the ones really being protected, IMO.  Hopefully, Jossy is ready to let out some of what he has been holding back and that will help connect the whole story.



yes, it goes something like this

paulus says to people," if you my is son convicted, i will tell and report on JOE and then JOE will report on JOHN and JOHN will report on JAMES and etc etc etc

i said it a couple weeks ago, these punks were making movies and the parents ( fathers)
knew about it and may have been involved. they were raping, stealing, and selling the movies, drugging people etc etc etc .. it is horrible and if one SQUEALS everyone goes down

so, they are protecting each other....

its a mess 

It's a mess alright.  And I do think Koen, Sanders, Freddy, Guido, GVC, are all involved or in the know, especially since they scattered like marbles, and most of them just moved away.

I don't know much about boats, but I've been deep sea fishing and I'm glad I wasn't out there in a boat the size that the Gottenbos' appeared to be.  Is that boat really big enough to go out 2 1/2 to 3 miles?  It looks kinda small for that. 



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: mrs. red on December 09, 2007, 11:27:07 PM
I didn't mean to derail the conversation... i was lurking and reading back and just got madder and madder :2redface:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: wreck on December 09, 2007, 11:27:13 PM
oh.. I hit post too soon... anyway with that rant, I agree it's way more than just these three little assbites.... it's way more, and the more i hear about that hateful island, the more sure I become.

After all, this island was the one where a girl was raped at school... gang raped actually and they filmed it and SHE is the one that was "tainted"

F@#$ that... if that were my daughter (which btw, they were so worried about feeding their daughters and God daughters, as I recall) I would so have killed the little punks that did that to her..... there would not be any baloney about HER being tainted,

rant over :2brickwall: :oops: :evil:
Exactly -- NOTHING seems to ruffle the locals. That is why I have NO sympathy for the "suffering" innocent locals from the boycott.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Magnolia on December 09, 2007, 11:27:55 PM

They did not want them to search the deep water either.
Remember Dompig would not make the call to the FBI
to get the deep water equipment.  They didn't mind the
shallow water search.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 09, 2007, 11:28:48 PM
I am hoping the search is successful because it has a good tip source that is not MIP6 or Julia or Dompig but someone who really knows something for a change.

Like the post Elaine posted tonight, there have been several and they seem to say something like this one with 2 miles up to 3.5 miles, that wine of Bacchus one.

I care just as much about Aruba as they cared about Natalee.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Helen Back on December 09, 2007, 11:30:35 PM
I didn't mean to derail the conversation... i was lurking and reading back and just got madder and madder :2redface:

Derail as in TRAIN WRECK? :shock:



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 09, 2007, 11:32:15 PM
I didn't mean to derail the conversation... i was lurking and reading back and just got madder and madder :2redface:


Sooner or later someone is going to kick Joran's rear so hard they will be wearing him for a shoe.  Guess that would be a clog in his instance.  But that photo of him where he is STILL smirking, putting the window of the car down so the media could see him just says it all.  He will cross the wrong one any day now.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 09, 2007, 11:34:44 PM

They did not want them to search the deep water either.
Remember Dompig would not make the call to the FBI
to get the deep water equipment.  They didn't mind the
shallow water search.


Yes, they refused to let the divers in the water after the FBI, Navy and U of FLorida has the best of diving teams actually there on the island with TES.  Once, they wouldn't let them rent a boat.

Wasn;t it the same with the landfill, they wouldn't even rent them those equipment things like little bulldozers.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: wreck on December 09, 2007, 11:36:06 PM
I didn't mean to derail the conversation... i was lurking and reading back and just got madder and madder :2redface:

Derail as in TRAIN WRECK? :shock:


????


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 09, 2007, 11:37:53 PM
I didn't mean to derail the conversation... i was lurking and reading back and just got madder and madder :2redface:

I always read and look forward to your posts, Mrs Red.  Sometimes it's hard to think of anything positive to post, at least for me.

I hope all the best theories will be checked out by this water search.  At the very least, we find out where Natalee is NOT.  But I am hoping for that miracle and that she will be found right where they think she is.

Is it too much to hope for at least one of Joran's shoes to be wrapped up in that tarp with her and some duct tape with Paulus fingerprints all over it?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 09, 2007, 11:41:13 PM
OK, now I have derailed things.

But I was just thinking how I wish Aruba had LASHES as punishment the way some countries do.

I would like to see those lashed who did this to Natalee.

That would include their smarmy enabling parent or parents.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Hotshot on December 09, 2007, 11:41:19 PM
I still say that "MOS" needs to look at this site  http://arubassilence.bravehost.com/chicago.html
to see exactly who is in the video, and go from there to get the truth.  Question some of those people over again.  Aru-Bay I feel tells alot.  Any input on that?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: wreck on December 09, 2007, 11:43:22 PM
I didn't mean to derail the conversation... i was lurking and reading back and just got madder and madder :2redface:

Derail as in TRAIN WRECK? :shock:


????
still waiting ... what did I say/do wrong????


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Hotshot on December 09, 2007, 11:45:18 PM
I need a new avatar, ughhhhhhh.  Wreck, I think I scared them away.  But I took a shower!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 09, 2007, 11:47:42 PM
I still say that "MOS" needs to look at this site  http://arubassilence.bravehost.com/chicago.html
to see exactly who is in the video, and go from there to get the truth.  Question some of those people over again.  Aru-Bay I feel tells alot.  Any input on that?

Hotshot - there are so many things.  Aru-bay videos, Casino Video, piece of Natalee's top picked up by the Ranger...it's endless.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Scandi on December 09, 2007, 11:48:31 PM
Well this is all fascinating.  You're getting me all worked up.  I fly on Wed. to Aruba

Hi OceanExploration,  Great to see you and this week will hopefully be a new beginning in the quest for Natalee.  When I actually sit down and think about what you are about to do, it amazes me.  Vast amounts of moving water, who knows what the sky will give you or if a major flock of migrating birds might hover overhead, watching you.  LOL  We will be there with you in spirit. 

To you it seems much different than to us, as you work with coordinates and have a map of the ocean floor and then the images from the sonar to go by.  So the area closes in after you have picked your parameters.

I looked at your website for a long time and it is amazing what you do.  Thanks again for joining us here.  ;}


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 09, 2007, 11:49:50 PM
Hotshot and Mrs. Red - neither one of you scared anyone away.  I was taking a bath and I think some people have already called it a night since they have work tomorrow.  I'm going to be watching something on TV at the top of the hour so if I don't respond, that's why. :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 09, 2007, 11:51:19 PM
Wreck,
Not you, didn't do anything wrong.  Mrs Red feels everybody stops posting when she posts sometimes.  She was trying to get the discussion going again.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Helen Back on December 09, 2007, 11:52:04 PM
I didn't mean to derail the conversation... i was lurking and reading back and just got madder and madder :2redface:

Derail as in TRAIN WRECK? :shock:


????
still waiting ... what did I say/do wrong????

 :lol: :lol:Nothing wrong! :lol: :lol: :lol:

Just derail = TRAIN WRECK and made me think of you, silly.  Wake up, wake up.

 :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: wreck on December 09, 2007, 11:55:18 PM
I didn't mean to derail the conversation... i was lurking and reading back and just got madder and madder :2redface:

Derail as in TRAIN WRECK? :shock:


????
still waiting ... what did I say/do wrong????

 :lol: :lol:Nothing wrong! :lol: :lol: :lol:

Just derail = TRAIN WRECK and made me think of you, silly.  Wake up, wake up.

 :lol:
ok -thanks -- I thought I offended someone! :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Hotshot on December 09, 2007, 11:55:44 PM
I still say that "MOS" needs to look at this site  http://arubassilence.bravehost.com/chicago.html
to see exactly who is in the video, and go from there to get the truth.  Question some of those people over again.  Aru-Bay I feel tells alot.  Any input on that?

Hotshot - there are so many things.  Aru-bay videos, Casino Video, piece of Natalee's top picked up by the Ranger...it's endless.
Yes, your not kidding Klaas.  We could name about a gazillian things to re-look at.  Its just how Dompig stated she was moved several times, and how we were all lied to about why they were doing what they were doing to those rocks so many times.  It's also the people in the videos that I am concerned about, and we all know one was Geoffs father.  Who were the rest, and why did Dave see the white truck down there, not to mention Paulus himself.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 09, 2007, 11:57:44 PM
If this could have been solved from behind a keyboard, I believe we would have done it by now.  It is going to take people actually there like OceanExplorer now.

Does anyone have that post about Mary never heard the buoy?  Maybe Ocean Explorer has never seen it and would be interested.  Not necessarily to try to look there unless there is a buoy at that exact mileage or something clicks with other information.

I don't do Shango any more so I don't have it now.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: mrs. red on December 09, 2007, 11:59:56 PM
I didn't mean to derail the conversation... i was lurking and reading back and just got madder and madder :2redface:

Derail as in TRAIN WRECK? :shock:


????
still waiting ... what did I say/do wrong????

I think she was just doing a play on words thinking you posted what I said...


Thanks ANNA, I can refrain from posting mean things so I do a lot of lurking... I know what you mean....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 10, 2007, 12:03:38 AM
LOL, Mrs Red tonight I am wanting to lash them!  Well, not me but have them lashed as is done in other hellholes on the earth.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Helen Back on December 10, 2007, 12:04:36 AM
I didn't mean to derail the conversation... i was lurking and reading back and just got madder and madder :2redface:

Derail as in TRAIN WRECK? :shock:


????
still waiting ... what did I say/do wrong????

I think she was just doing a play on words thinking you posted what I said...


Thanks ANNA, I can refrain from posting mean things so I do a lot of lurking... I know what you mean....

It was kinda  slow in here, so I was just playin' with Wreck that's all.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Hotshot on December 10, 2007, 12:05:15 AM
If this could have been solved from behind a keyboard, I believe we would have done it by now.  It is going to take people actually there like OceanExplorer now.

Does anyone have that post about Mary never heard the buoy?  Maybe Ocean Explorer has never seen it and would be interested.  Not necessarily to try to look there unless there is a buoy at that exact mileage or something clicks with other information.

I don't do Shango any more so I don't have it now.

.
Good one Anna


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: mrs. red on December 10, 2007, 12:06:41 AM
I think we solved this a long time ago... but we just don't have definative proof!  I do hope OExpl. that you find her, we will be praying for all of you, that's certain!


O/T to CBB.. you did a great job on the CLinton flyer... I hope Carolyn saw it.!  Thank you  for letting me volunteer you  :wink:

also, some one emial me or pm me if we are going to do a longer prayer vigil this time...

ON that note, I have to get out of here.... gotta work tomorrow...

Nite monkeys... KEEP the Faith!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 10, 2007, 12:07:42 AM
If this could have been solved from behind a keyboard, I believe we would have done it by now.  It is going to take people actually there like OceanExplorer now.

Does anyone have that post about Mary never heard the buoy?  Maybe Ocean Explorer has never seen it and would be interested.  Not necessarily to try to look there unless there is a buoy at that exact mileage or something clicks with other information.

I don't do Shango any more so I don't have it now.

.
Here ya go

Shango on June 27th, 2005 10:29 pm
Babylonians and Shivas do not play with sandcastles
Follow the music!
Mary who was not a Virgin entered the maze to discover it’s secrets
The lamb is scared
The fires are lit
But now the lamb is a goat


Shango on June 27th, 2005 10:31 pm
Mary never heard the buoy toll
ask the men who play dice and “roll”


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: mrs. red on December 10, 2007, 12:08:27 AM
Helen, I got it (that you were playing with Wreck).. and thought it was cute... I just didn't have anything clever to add... :lol: :lol:



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 10, 2007, 12:11:04 AM
Thank you, Truthseeker!

But I don't think that's the one I really wanted.  Do you know the one about the poison wine of Bacchus and something about who gave it to Natalee at a certain time like 3 a.m. and 3.5 mile boat trip? 

Any water posts we can think of might be of some help or click with some information found or sent to them.  Just a thought.  Those were the only two I could think of off hand.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: wreck on December 10, 2007, 12:14:01 AM
I think we solved this a long time ago... but we just don't have definative proof!  I do hope OExpl. that you find her, we will be praying for all of you, that's certain!


O/T to CBB.. you did a great job on the CLinton flyer... I hope Carolyn saw it.!  Thank you  for letting me volunteer you  :wink:

also, some one emial me or pm me if we are going to do a longer prayer vigil this time...

ON that note, I have to get out of here.... gotta work tomorrow...

Nite monkeys... KEEP the Faith!
goodnight everyone, from me too! I'm sorry I did not catch the "funnin" right off - I've been on sort of nasty snit the last few days. I DO have faith that everything will eventually turn out satisfactorly -- I just doubt it will ever involve cooperation from Aruba.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 10, 2007, 12:23:31 AM
Thank you, Truthseeker!

But I don't think that's the one I really wanted.  Do you know the one about the poison wine of Bacchus and something about who gave it to Natalee at a certain time like 3 a.m. and 3.5 mile boat trip? 

Any water posts we can think of might be of some help or click with some information found or sent to them.  Just a thought.  Those were the only two I could think of off hand.

.

Yep, I have it.  I don't know of any posts that specifically mention water.  The buoy post could be construed that way.  Personally, I always thought Shago was saying that she was not out to see, having never heard the buoy toll.  Some interpret that to mean she was already dead when they got out to sea.  Here's the wine post:

Shango on June 27th, 2005 10:55 pm
Why do they leave the Maze open?
Why hasn’t an Arawak probed it’s fetid depths.
Tell the Cowboys!
The Arawaks are hiding the path to the Maze for the Babylonians.


Shango on June 27th, 2005 10:57 pm
All know of the music
beckoning lost souls
to enter the seven levels of inferno
who gave Mary the poison wine of Bacchus?
Enter the Maze.






Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Helen Back on December 10, 2007, 12:30:05 AM
nite monkeys

Hang tough



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: yapperz1 on December 10, 2007, 12:32:44 AM
If this could have been solved from behind a keyboard, I believe we would have done it by now.  It is going to take people actually there like OceanExplorer now.

Does anyone have that post about Mary never heard the buoy?  Maybe Ocean Explorer has never seen it and would be interested.  Not necessarily to try to look there unless there is a buoy at that exact mileage or something clicks with other information.

I don't do Shango any more so I don't have it now.

.

Anna, I think those of us behind a keyboard stand/stood a better chance of solving this than any of the PTB on Aruba. At least WE tried to get to the truth!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Scandi on December 10, 2007, 12:35:47 AM
Wreck,
Not you, didn't do anything wrong.  Mrs Red feels everybody stops posting when she posts sometimes.  She was trying to get the discussion going again.

Hi Anna,  Mrs Red was interested in a prayer vigil before the Persistance takes off to search.  I think it is a wonderful idea, as no matter how we posters vascilate in what we discuss, we all know the power of prayer.  Have you ever done that here before or know how it would be planned?  xox 

PS:  I don't post much, but always enjoy you.  Your mind is always on go!  YaYa


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: longhaul on December 10, 2007, 01:18:12 AM
I didn't mean to derail the conversation... i was lurking and reading back and just got madder and madder :2redface:

Derail as in TRAIN WRECK? :shock:


????
still waiting ... what did I say/do wrong????
[/quot



Wreck, Probably messed up quotes again but u said nothing wrong.  Keepupthecheerleading, think we all need it now


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on December 10, 2007, 01:52:26 AM
Klaas, you have mail!   At both gmail and cox addresses...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: AZLady on December 10, 2007, 02:04:05 AM
Here you go, Anna.  I seem to be posting this message more and more often.

http://www.aruba-bb.com/viewforum.php?f=14
bakabl wrote:
Frist Im vary sorry to hear of the vary sad case of Natalee Holloway in such a wonderful place like Aruba but it could happen anywere at any time. There are a few questions that need to be asked of the two men that the FBI are questioning - 1st ask them about the drink that was given to Natalee around 3:15am Aruba Time the morring Natalee never retyrn to her hotel and ask them about what the drug was in the drink that Natalee drunk without her knowing. 2nd ask them about the boat and the 2-1/2 mile trip they took.

They should break dowm and tell the truth about are were Natalee can be found.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 10, 2007, 02:08:30 AM
Klaas, you have mail!   At both gmail and cox addresses...

Hi Dihannah - got it and responded!

Time to call it a night now...GOODNIGHT ALL!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: AZLady on December 10, 2007, 02:14:18 AM
Someone was commenting a while back about two things in the video of Paulus at the Blackjack table that jumped out at me.  One, some people thought he had a videocamera and/or a small silver camera or cigarette box in front of him.  Two, someone commented on his action of reaching down under the table.  Both of these are indications of cheating.  In most casinos, cameras are not allowed and nothing is allowed to sit on the table.  These devices can be used to read marked cards.  A player is to keep both hands on the table in a casino because devices can be used, and even attached underneath a table, to assist a player in keeping a hole card to be used when it is to his benefit. 

I believe that Paulus is a cheater and heavily involved in the money-laundering that are the Aruban casinos' sole reason for existence.  Apparently, if we picked up his clumsy attempts to cheat on a video of only a few seconds, Paulus is not very adept at his game.  On the other hand, when playing with a table of naive 18 year old girls who have no idea what they are doing, he didn't need to be very skilled.  He just needed someone to blur that video sufficiently so the world didn't immediately spot his clumsy cheating.  Paulus, Paulus, Paulus--your game is so obvious that even a novice like me can see what you are doing.  That's what happens when the pickings are easy and the players get sloppy.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 10, 2007, 05:23:43 AM
I still say that "MOS" needs to look at this site  http://arubassilence.bravehost.com/chicago.html
to see exactly who is in the video, and go from there to get the truth.  Question some of those people over again.  Aru-Bay I feel tells alot.  Any input on that?

Hotshot - there are so many things.  Aru-bay videos, Casino Video, piece of Natalee's top picked up by the Ranger...it's endless.

That is a great point Hotshot!! Mos would know who they are. I can't believe after 2 1/2 years we never did find out who it was in those videos!! crazy!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 10, 2007, 05:28:30 AM
i find the post interesting but im not sure i believe it.

its certainly possible.. but i think she is on land


I agree robots.


Me too.  I've always thought that.

hi noly, im not going to throw out the possibility of a boat but it seems like
then you have too many people involved... ummmm im not sure but that is what it seems to me..
land fill - seems much less complicated - especially when you have people not allowing you to search that area  :wink:

that freaking landfill is/was toxic too... red has a huge scar from that place... like a chemical burn...

and then Julia the evil bitch, came on here and laughed about how they told them the landfill didn't have anything...etc.  Tim, Dave, eveyONE was sick after that landfill was  searched... of course for it only to be filled in and set fire to...

I fear that is where they hid Natalee.... but I want to be wrong and them find her in the ocean....


and I still say there are no innocent arubans because someone, somewhere knows and just won't say....

I agree there are plenty who know Mrs. Red. It makes me mad your husband and Dave and others had to wade through that mess, but it also warms my heart that there were such great people who stood by Dave's side to do it!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 10, 2007, 05:30:54 AM
WTF???  I'm gone for a few hours and come back to see this??? I'm still back on page 5..will catch up in a minute. :shock: :shock:  :lol:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/pvdszipper.gif)

I was looking back in the thread and looked at this picture again and I wanted to point out the sweat outline on Paulus shirt  :puker: :puker: :puker:
:cool: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:

Eewwwwww, I didn't notice his baggage before.  :shock: :shock:

Double EEEWWW!!! It is 4:30 am!! Woke up early and haven't even finished my 1st cup of coffee...that is just too gross for words!!! Look at all the sweat too!! AAAHHH!! It's like a nightmare..lol..am I really awake? :shock:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: MumInOhio on December 10, 2007, 05:34:35 AM
Someone was commenting a while back about two things in the video of Paulus at the Blackjack table that jumped out at me.  One, some people thought he had a videocamera and/or a small silver camera or cigarette box in front of him.  Two, someone commented on his action of reaching down under the table.  Both of these are indications of cheating.  In most casinos, cameras are not allowed and nothing is allowed to sit on the table.  These devices can be used to read marked cards.  A player is to keep both hands on the table in a casino because devices can be used, and even attached underneath a table, to assist a player in keeping a hole card to be used when it is to his benefit. 

I believe that Paulus is a cheater and heavily involved in the money-laundering that are the Aruban casinos' sole reason for existence.  Apparently, if we picked up his clumsy attempts to cheat on a video of only a few seconds, Paulus is not very adept at his game.  On the other hand, when playing with a table of naive 18 year old girls who have no idea what they are doing, he didn't need to be very skilled.  He just needed someone to blur that video sufficiently so the world didn't immediately spot his clumsy cheating.  Paulus, Paulus, Paulus--your game is so obvious that even a novice like me can see what you are doing.  That's what happens when the pickings are easy and the players get sloppy.


Found this in Msmaple's Murder and Crime thread...
SunFreak2 posted this on LCD 01/25/2007, also re. the above posts.


Quote
At the Caribbean Financial Action Task Force in 1997 - Rick Smid (now Judge Smid) was the expert on Money Laundering in the Casino & Gaming Industry!!! See reference below. I found this many months ago and wondered if Judge Smid now heads up the illegal money laundering operations in the Caribbean. It makes sense to me that an expert on money laundering could decide to go to the "dark side" as he would know all the ins & outs and how to avoid the law.

Smid is the Judge who freed Joran, Freddie, K2 in September 2005. He supposedly is Paulus's good buddy. Could Paulus be in cahoots with Smid in the money laundering biz? Maybe Joran & Guido were in on it too.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

CFATF Typology Exercise II: Casino Regulatory Conference
Aruba - July 16-17, 1997

The Nature and Extent of Money Laundering in the Casino and Gaming Industry
Hon. Tennyson R.G. Wells, AG and Minister of Justice-The Bahamas
Mr. Rick Smid, National Public Prosecutor-Netherlands

source: http://www.cfatf.org/eng/typoexe/ click on Casino & Gaming
 
 Report to moderator    Logged 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Anna's reply....
This was allegedly Karin Janssen's area of expertise as well, prior to her leaving The Netherlands for Aruba.  I have often wondered if there was a connection between her and Judge Smid in this regard and if they knew each other prior to coming to the islands.

Was the idea for these two to prosecute cases of money-mishandling or participate in them?  Odd that they both would have that particular area of knowledge.











Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: MumInOhio on December 10, 2007, 06:19:32 AM

quote from Magnolia
Mos came out with guns ablazin'.

He said that he has Explosive new evidence.
He said that he had proof that Natalee was dead.
He said that the father was definately involved.
He was willing to talk.
He gave us all hope and made us believe in him. (except San)

What happened to him?  Who got to him?
Just before the Kalpoes were released he suddenly canceled
a news conference and his next interview he blamed the
family, the media and the DEA agent. He was suddenly
like a different man.

Where is the explosive new evidence? 
How did he know that the Kalpoes disposed of the body?

It is all goofy!


Thank you, Magnolia.

  Maybe Judge Smid got to Mr Mos. I have been looking for information on both he and Wit since the last time Ramm was here defending their decisions. As is with Archer, there is not a lot out there about Judge H.C. ‘Rick’ Smid, Smit, Smitt and Judge Jacob ‘Bob’ Wit, Witt.

Smid was the principal player in this case. He ruled on the DNA and released the suspects among other things.

Wit was at the van der Sloots, with Vocking the day the search warrant was serve in 2005. He was appointed to the Caribbean Court of Justice on June 1st 2005, so why was he there to limit that warrant. Did he have the authority?

Lala’s…where do Smid/Wit, either or both, fit in as Dirty Hand/dirty hand?








Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Silverfox on December 10, 2007, 06:19:43 AM
Someone was commenting a while back about two things in the video of Paulus at the Blackjack table that jumped out at me.  One, some people thought he had a videocamera and/or a small silver camera or cigarette box in front of him.  Two, someone commented on his action of reaching down under the table.  Both of these are indications of cheating.  In most casinos, cameras are not allowed and nothing is allowed to sit on the table.  These devices can be used to read marked cards.  A player is to keep both hands on the table in a casino because devices can be used, and even attached underneath a table, to assist a player in keeping a hole card to be used when it is to his benefit. 

I believe that Paulus is a cheater and heavily involved in the money-laundering that are the Aruban casinos' sole reason for existence.  Apparently, if we picked up his clumsy attempts to cheat on a video of only a few seconds, Paulus is not very adept at his game.  On the other hand, when playing with a table of naive 18 year old girls who have no idea what they are doing, he didn't need to be very skilled.  He just needed someone to blur that video sufficiently so the world didn't immediately spot his clumsy cheating.  Paulus, Paulus, Paulus--your game is so obvious that even a novice like me can see what you are doing.  That's what happens when the pickings are easy and the players get sloppy.


Found this in Msmaple's Murder and Crime thread...
SunFreak2 posted this on LCD 01/25/2007, also re. the above posts.


Quote
At the Caribbean Financial Action Task Force in 1997 - Rick Smid (now Judge Smid) was the expert on Money Laundering in the Casino & Gaming Industry!!! See reference below. I found this many months ago and wondered if Judge Smid now heads up the illegal money laundering operations in the Caribbean. It makes sense to me that an expert on money laundering could decide to go to the "dark side" as he would know all the ins & outs and how to avoid the law.

Smid is the Judge who freed Joran, Freddie, K2 in September 2005. He supposedly is Paulus's good buddy. Could Paulus be in cahoots with Smid in the money laundering biz? Maybe Joran & Guido were in on it too.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

CFATF Typology Exercise II: Casino Regulatory Conference
Aruba - July 16-17, 1997

The Nature and Extent of Money Laundering in the Casino and Gaming Industry
Hon. Tennyson R.G. Wells, AG and Minister of Justice-The Bahamas
Mr. Rick Smid, National Public Prosecutor-Netherlands

source: http://www.cfatf.org/eng/typoexe/ click on Casino & Gaming
 
 Report to moderator    Logged 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Anna's reply....
This was allegedly Karin Janssen's area of expertise as well, prior to her leaving The Netherlands for Aruba.  I have often wondered if there was a connection between her and Judge Smid in this regard and if they knew each other prior to coming to the islands.

Was the idea for these two to prosecute cases of money-mishandling or participate in them?  Odd that they both would have that particular area of knowledge.




Ooh you are getting warmer... and remember...Paulus used to handle contacts and "delicate" matters for Rudy Croes... now connect the dots... Contracts include the casinos, right? The government of Aruba, I am told, receives substantial revenues from those same casinos...Who does Posner pay?  "Under" the table (like in the casino video) slight of hand might be coming at all levels... If you can get the courts and the minister of justice in your pocket you are well insulated, right?  Where else in the World would Posner be able to operate a casino after what happened to him in the US...????



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: MumInOhio on December 10, 2007, 06:31:15 AM
Hi Siverfox, Helen Back was asking if you have any links on Posner/Smid? TIA


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Silverfox on December 10, 2007, 06:41:17 AM
Hi Siverfox, Helen Back was asking if you have any links on Posner/Smid? TIA

No not directly... you have to connect the dots and follow the money...

I am assuming that this is what the separate "corruption" investigation is all about that the Dutch investigators were "also" working on when they came to Aruba.  I think perhaps father sloot was already being investigated due to his position in the judiciary as well as his past connection to the Justice Ministry == hence the first set of wiretaps ...

I think he should be very careful... If there is a mob connection at play here they do not like "loose ends and loose cannons'.... is he a liabiity?  who knows... but obviously he lost his judge opportunity prior to nat's disappearance...obviously he got special favors at the casinos and passed those on to his son... obviously he had connections in high places in government....

Remember how the mob cleaned up the casino gaming problems in the early days of vegas?  If there is a connection here then you can bet that sooner or later some "clean-up" might take place since he may have outlived his usefulness with all this publicity.

Smid's credentials on the other hand suggest that he has very deep knowledge of how things are done in the money laundering and casino business.  How in the world did the justices allow Posner to obtain the right to run a casino and happened to the missing HI manager (he is still missing, right?)... or was he ever?  maybe I got him mixed up with someone else.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: MumInOhio on December 10, 2007, 06:52:10 AM
Silverfox I thought Posner was still around, but honestly not sure. He may have left just after this all started and came back. He has been discussed a lot here in the past two and a half years. Will have to go back and refresh my memory. Thanks!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: MumInOhio on December 10, 2007, 06:58:40 AM
O/T...Lady Devon, if you see this, would you please go over to the Monkey Musings thread and look at Ibe's post at the bottom of page 13. Any info on this would be appreciated. TIA


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 10, 2007, 07:01:44 AM
http://joranvandersloot.blogspot.com/2006/02/joran-goes-on-record-we-just-got-back.html
  March 2006....at 8:41 Pm
I just wanna say once you go to that page scroll way down near the bottom to see it, as there are hundreds of posts on there,from several days...scroll way down

That's right around the time he/she stopped updating the blog.  The comment section was left open for a long time.  Shoot, you can probably still comment on it now unless comments are moderated. But as far as new posts on the blog they stopped around March 2006.


I remember reading that too! Klaas...can you get a screenshot in case it goes 'poof'???


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 10, 2007, 07:04:29 AM
seems very possible but im not sure it could have happened that same night

i guess it could have....but

The post doesn't say which night  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 10, 2007, 07:34:36 AM

quote from Magnolia
Mos came out with guns ablazin'.

He said that he has Explosive new evidence.
He said that he had proof that Natalee was dead.
He said that the father was definately involved.
He was willing to talk.
He gave us all hope and made us believe in him. (except San)

What happened to him?  Who got to him?
Just before the Kalpoes were released he suddenly canceled
a news conference and his next interview he blamed the
family, the media and the DEA agent. He was suddenly
like a different man.

Where is the explosive new evidence? 
How did he know that the Kalpoes disposed of the body?

It is all goofy!


Thank you, Magnolia.

  Maybe Judge Smid got to Mr Mos. I have been looking for information on both he and Wit since the last time Ramm was here defending their decisions. As is with Archer, there is not a lot out there about Judge H.C. ‘Rick’ Smid, Smit, Smitt and Judge Jacob ‘Bob’ Wit, Witt.

Smid was the principal player in this case. He ruled on the DNA and released the suspects among other things.

Wit was at the van der Sloots, with Vocking the day the search warrant was serve in 2005. He was appointed to the Caribbean Court of Justice on June 1st 2005, so why was he there to limit that warrant. Did he have the authority?

Lala’s…where do Smid/Wit, either or both, fit in as Dirty Hand/dirty hand?









 :shock: mmmmmmmmm...A Judge HANDS down a ruling ...in the opinion of most, that ruling HANDED down is wrong...:smt107
DIRTY HAND !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :smt119

:2saywhaa:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 10, 2007, 07:52:38 AM
 20 Most Shocking Unsolved Crimes - E Channel - Sunday, Dec. 9, 2007


Natalee was #1 at the very end of the show. I kept waiting and waiting.
Beth and Dave both had segments.  20 Most Shocking Unsolved Crimes ...The Natalee Holloway mystery is # 1 !!!!!!!!
This was actually a very good program...hope they repeat it for those who did not get to see.

This is for people who don't read back, lol.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Silverfox on December 10, 2007, 08:10:06 AM

quote from Magnolia
Mos came out with guns ablazin'.

He said that he has Explosive new evidence.
He said that he had proof that Natalee was dead.
He said that the father was definately involved.
He was willing to talk.
He gave us all hope and made us believe in him. (except San)

What happened to him?  Who got to him?
Just before the Kalpoes were released he suddenly canceled
a news conference and his next interview he blamed the
family, the media and the DEA agent. He was suddenly
like a different man.

Where is the explosive new evidence? 
How did he know that the Kalpoes disposed of the body?

It is all goofy!


Thank you, Magnolia.

  Maybe Judge Smid got to Mr Mos. I have been looking for information on both he and Wit since the last time Ramm was here defending their decisions. As is with Archer, there is not a lot out there about Judge H.C. ‘Rick’ Smid, Smit, Smitt and Judge Jacob ‘Bob’ Wit, Witt.

Smid was the principal player in this case. He ruled on the DNA and released the suspects among other things.

Wit was at the van der Sloots, with Vocking the day the search warrant was serve in 2005. He was appointed to the Caribbean Court of Justice on June 1st 2005, so why was he there to limit that warrant. Did he have the authority?

Lala’s…where do Smid/Wit, either or both, fit in as Dirty Hand/dirty hand?









 :shock: mmmmmmmmm...A Judge HANDS down a ruling ...in the opinion of most, that ruling HANDED down is wrong...:smt107
DIRTY HAND !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :smt119

:2saywhaa:

LOL    :P  Good one!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Magnolia on December 10, 2007, 08:13:24 AM

Someone was commenting a while back about two things in the video of Paulus at the Blackjack table that jumped out at me.  One, some people thought he had a videocamera and/or a small silver camera or cigarette box in front of him.  Two, someone commented on his action of reaching down under the table.  Both of these are indications of cheating.  In most casinos, cameras are not allowed and nothing is allowed to sit on the table.  These devices can be used to read marked cards.  A player is to keep both hands on the table in a casino because devices can be used, and even attached underneath a table, to assist a player in keeping a hole card to be used when it is to his benefit. 

I believe that Paulus is a cheater and heavily involved in the money-laundering that are the Aruban casinos' sole reason for existence.  Apparently, if we picked up his clumsy attempts to cheat on a video of only a few seconds, Paulus is not very adept at his game.  On the other hand, when playing with a table of naive 18 year old girls who have no idea what they are doing, he didn't need to be very skilled.  He just needed someone to blur that video sufficiently so the world didn't immediately spot his clumsy cheating.  Paulus, Paulus, Paulus--your game is so obvious that even a novice like me can see what you are doing.  That's what happens when the pickings are easy and the players get sloppy.


Found this in Msmaple's Murder and Crime thread...
SunFreak2 posted this on LCD 01/25/2007, also re. the above posts.


Quote
At the Caribbean Financial Action Task Force in 1997 - Rick Smid (now Judge Smid) was the expert on Money Laundering in the Casino & Gaming Industry!!! See reference below. I found this many months ago and wondered if Judge Smid now heads up the illegal money laundering operations in the Caribbean. It makes sense to me that an expert on money laundering could decide to go to the "dark side" as he would know all the ins & outs and how to avoid the law.

Smid is the Judge who freed Joran, Freddie, K2 in September 2005. He supposedly is Paulus's good buddy. Could Paulus be in cahoots with Smid in the money laundering biz? Maybe Joran & Guido were in on it too.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

CFATF Typology Exercise II: Casino Regulatory Conference
Aruba - July 16-17, 1997

The Nature and Extent of Money Laundering in the Casino and Gaming Industry
Hon. Tennyson R.G. Wells, AG and Minister of Justice-The Bahamas
Mr. Rick Smid, National Public Prosecutor-Netherlands

source: http://www.cfatf.org/eng/typoexe/ click on Casino & Gaming
 
 Report to moderator    Logged 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Anna's reply....
This was allegedly Karin Janssen's area of expertise as well, prior to her leaving The Netherlands for Aruba.  I have often wondered if there was a connection between her and Judge Smid in this regard and if they knew each other prior to coming to the islands.

Was the idea for these two to prosecute cases of money-mishandling or participate in them?  Odd that they both would have that particular area of knowledge.




Ooh you are getting warmer... and remember...Paulus used to handle contacts and "delicate" matters for Rudy Croes... now connect the dots... Contracts include the casinos, right? The government of Aruba, I am told, receives substantial revenues from those same casinos...Who does Posner pay?  "Under" the table (like in the casino video) slight of hand might be coming at all levels... If you can get the courts and the minister of justice in your pocket you are well insulated, right?  Where else in the World would Posner be able to operate a casino after what happened to him in the US...????





I read on the front page of SM last night that Paulus wrote the contract
for Posner's casino.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: MumInOhio on December 10, 2007, 08:18:24 AM
Magnolia...Was that in what Red posted from Jossy? Or comments? Didn't get a chance to read it yet. TIA


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Magnolia on December 10, 2007, 08:20:53 AM
Magnolia...Was that in what Red posted from Jossy? Or comments? Didn't get a chance to read it yet. TIA

I just realized that I should have clarified that.
I was googling and found it in an old comment section after
Red had posted about a drug laundering arrest.  I may have saved it
Will look and see.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Silverfox on December 10, 2007, 08:29:58 AM

Someone was commenting a while back about two things in the video of Paulus at the Blackjack table that jumped out at me.  One, some people thought he had a videocamera and/or a small silver camera or cigarette box in front of him.  Two, someone commented on his action of reaching down under the table.  Both of these are indications of cheating.  In most casinos, cameras are not allowed and nothing is allowed to sit on the table.  These devices can be used to read marked cards.  A player is to keep both hands on the table in a casino because devices can be used, and even attached underneath a table, to assist a player in keeping a hole card to be used when it is to his benefit. 

I believe that Paulus is a cheater and heavily involved in the money-laundering that are the Aruban casinos' sole reason for existence.  Apparently, if we picked up his clumsy attempts to cheat on a video of only a few seconds, Paulus is not very adept at his game.  On the other hand, when playing with a table of naive 18 year old girls who have no idea what they are doing, he didn't need to be very skilled.  He just needed someone to blur that video sufficiently so the world didn't immediately spot his clumsy cheating.  Paulus, Paulus, Paulus--your game is so obvious that even a novice like me can see what you are doing.  That's what happens when the pickings are easy and the players get sloppy.


Found this in Msmaple's Murder and Crime thread...
SunFreak2 posted this on LCD 01/25/2007, also re. the above posts.


Quote
At the Caribbean Financial Action Task Force in 1997 - Rick Smid (now Judge Smid) was the expert on Money Laundering in the Casino & Gaming Industry!!! See reference below. I found this many months ago and wondered if Judge Smid now heads up the illegal money laundering operations in the Caribbean. It makes sense to me that an expert on money laundering could decide to go to the "dark side" as he would know all the ins & outs and how to avoid the law.

Smid is the Judge who freed Joran, Freddie, K2 in September 2005. He supposedly is Paulus's good buddy. Could Paulus be in cahoots with Smid in the money laundering biz? Maybe Joran & Guido were in on it too.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

CFATF Typology Exercise II: Casino Regulatory Conference
Aruba - July 16-17, 1997

The Nature and Extent of Money Laundering in the Casino and Gaming Industry
Hon. Tennyson R.G. Wells, AG and Minister of Justice-The Bahamas
Mr. Rick Smid, National Public Prosecutor-Netherlands

source: http://www.cfatf.org/eng/typoexe/ click on Casino & Gaming
 
 Report to moderator    Logged 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Anna's reply....
This was allegedly Karin Janssen's area of expertise as well, prior to her leaving The Netherlands for Aruba.  I have often wondered if there was a connection between her and Judge Smid in this regard and if they knew each other prior to coming to the islands.

Was the idea for these two to prosecute cases of money-mishandling or participate in them?  Odd that they both would have that particular area of knowledge.




Ooh you are getting warmer... and remember...Paulus used to handle contacts and "delicate" matters for Rudy Croes... now connect the dots... Contracts include the casinos, right? The government of Aruba, I am told, receives substantial revenues from those same casinos...Who does Posner pay?  "Under" the table (like in the casino video) slight of hand might be coming at all levels... If you can get the courts and the minister of justice in your pocket you are well insulated, right?  Where else in the World would Posner be able to operate a casino after what happened to him in the US...????





I read on the front page of SM last night that Paulus wrote the contract
for Posner's casino.

Looks like nice "perks" right?  Casino credit privs...Looking the other way for minor son, lots of free drinks, and what a way to get extra cash that looks innocent (Hey honey, I won it playing poker -- lets remodel the concrete and the swimming pool, ok?)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Magnolia on December 10, 2007, 08:43:30 AM
Magnolia...Was that in what Red posted from Jossy? Or comments? Didn't get a chance to read it yet. TIA

I just realized that I should have clarified that.
I was googling and found it in an old comment section after
Red had posted about a drug laundering arrest.  I may have saved it
Will look and see.

Here is the link...I think.

http://scaredmonkeys.com/2007/05/22/man-sentenced-in-aruba-for-money-laundering-300000-euros-in-drug-money-verdict-is-of-great-importance-surely-you-jest/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: AZLady on December 10, 2007, 08:48:15 AM
I think we've established the Mafia involvement in the casinos and the money laundering that forms the backbone of their business.  Now, are you ready for the next step? 
ta da...
Online gambling.  Yes.  This is seldom discussed but is Aruba's dirty little secret that washes more drug money than the little casinos that line her hotel row.  The Caribbean has thousands of online casinos, and the Excelsior was one of the first!!  The profit is huge, the overhead is minimal, and it is the perfect vehicle for money laundering as it is all done digitally, moving money from one account to another to another.  It is currently illegal in the US but it is legal to gamble online in many European countries. 

The casinos are a visible front and provided the shoe in to the lucrative business of online gambling.  This is really where the money is and the base for the money laundering.  And, the US has not been able to stop it, any more than they can stop the drugs that flood into our country, or the money that flows out to pay for those drugs, siphoned through the legal businesses of online gambling in the Caribbean.

And, although Aruba has banking laws recently on the books intended to guard against money laundering, they have not prosecuted even ONE case, ever.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: AZLady on December 10, 2007, 08:51:25 AM
Excuse me.  I misspoke.  Under pressure from NL, Aruba has prosecuted ONE case of money laundering.  ONE case.  What a joke.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Blonde on December 10, 2007, 08:52:07 AM
WTF???  I'm gone for a few hours and come back to see this??? I'm still back on page 5..will catch up in a minute. :shock: :shock:  :lol:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/pvdszipper.gif)

I was looking back in the thread and looked at this picture again and I wanted to point out the sweat outline on Paulus shirt  :puker: :puker: :puker:


 :shock: :shock: :lol: :lol: PUKE


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: MumInOhio on December 10, 2007, 08:53:54 AM
Thanks Magnolia!

Lala's...Thank You too. But because Lalas sometimes talks in riddles :shock: and all the Monkeys are important, I don't have a clue! Think Angie and I are sharing that one brain cell. :lol: :lol:But thanks anyway!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: MumInOhio on December 10, 2007, 09:03:55 AM
Excuse me.  I misspoke.  Under pressure from NL, Aruba has prosecuted ONE case of money laundering.  ONE case.  What a joke.


Was just reading some old posts last night in Msmaple's 'Murder and Crime' thread last night about this from Anna and Ms Maple. (bottom of page 17), but haven't had a chance to read any further.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: private eye on December 10, 2007, 09:11:26 AM
I think and believe that in order for this to go any further that the GOOD people of Aruba has to get off their duff's and get involved in this and demand justice not only for Natalee but also for themselves. Sitting back and keeping their mouths shut is not the answer to this problem.  Maybe Jossy needs to rally the people of the island around him and demand an accounting of the goings-on on the island.  If the people cannot rally around then this case is lost.  Mos cannot do it on his own.  It has to be in the interest of the people and that island.  I am so sick of the same old saying "but this will hurt the innocent people of Aruba who had nothing to do with this".  Or "all the people involved are not even Arubans".  If they are not going to be a part of this solution then they are the problem along with the government and judges and the Sloots and Kalpoes.

Thus the justification for subjecting them to a boycott or the implementation of a tarrif on all travel tickets to and from Aruba by the USA


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 10, 2007, 09:35:19 AM
RE: ARUBAN WITNESS WITH B-DAY IN DECEMBER.... this was just posted at RU
Jonathan Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2007 9:27 am   
Translation of cocaine witness PV according to "Fierljepper"

We, XX and YY, sergeants with the Korps Politie Aruba and both assigned to the Team Special Projects, decleare the following:

On Thursday 2? September, 2005, around XX:XX hours, we interrogators questioned as a witness the man named:

(name illegible)

Born on Aruba on ?? December 19?? (...) on living street 479? on Aruba.

My statement made in Papiamento, has been, by me NAME, translated into Dutch and put in writing and reads as follows:

I work as a "clerk" ??? for ??? I've recently got a job there.

To your question whether I know something about the disappearance of the American girl Natalee Holloway, I answer you as follows. I am a friend of Joran van der Sloot (with Joran we refer to suspect J.A.P. van der Sloot, remark interrogator). Joran and I both play tennis at the "Aruba Racquet Club". 


~~~~~~~~
name illegible  :roll:
Born on Aruba on ?? December 19??  :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: MumInOhio on December 10, 2007, 09:48:37 AM
RE: ARUBAN WITNESS WITH B-DAY IN DECEMBER.... this was just posted at RU
Jonathan Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2007 9:27 am   
Translation of cocaine witness PV according to "Fierljepper"

We, XX and YY, sergeants with the Korps Politie Aruba and both assigned to the Team Special Projects, decleare the following:

On Thursday 2? September, 2005, around XX:XX hours, we interrogators questioned as a witness the man named:

(name illegible)

Born on Aruba on ?? December 19?? (...) on living street 479? on Aruba.

My statement made in Papiamento, has been, by me NAME, translated into Dutch and put in writing and reads as follows:

I work as a "clerk" ??? for ??? I've recently got a job there.

To your question whether I know something about the disappearance of the American girl Natalee Holloway, I answer you as follows. I am a friend of Joran van der Sloot (with Joran we refer to suspect J.A.P. van der Sloot, remark interrogator). Joran and I both play tennis at the "Aruba Racquet Club". 


~~~~~~~~
name illegible  :roll:
Born on Aruba on ?? December 19??  :roll:


Nut44x4 Do you remember who you and Leslie had excluded? Was Santos one? TIA


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on December 10, 2007, 09:50:11 AM
I think and believe that in order for this to go any further that the GOOD people of Aruba has to get off their duff's and get involved in this and demand justice not only for Natalee but also for themselves. Sitting back and keeping their mouths shut is not the answer to this problem.  Maybe Jossy needs to rally the people of the island around him and demand an accounting of the goings-on on the island.  If the people cannot rally around then this case is lost.  Mos cannot do it on his own.  It has to be in the interest of the people and that island.  I am so sick of the same old saying "but this will hurt the innocent people of Aruba who had nothing to do with this".  Or "all the people involved are not even Arubans".  If they are not going to be a part of this solution then they are the problem along with the government and judges and the Sloots and Kalpoes.

Thus the justification for subjecting them to a boycott or the implementation of a tarrif on all travel tickets to and from Aruba by the USA


For the next 15 years. The so-called good people only spoke up to protest Beth. We will protest their island.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on December 10, 2007, 09:52:41 AM
Excuse me.  I misspoke.  Under pressure from NL, Aruba has prosecuted ONE case of money laundering.  ONE case.  What a joke.


Isn't that pathetic? But not surprising, MEP and the mafia run the island. I suspect all the Dutch judges have been paid off should any participants run afoul of the law.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: WhiskeyGirl on December 10, 2007, 10:00:13 AM
WTF???  I'm gone for a few hours and come back to see this??? I'm still back on page 5..will catch up in a minute. :shock: :shock:  :lol:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/pvdszipper.gif)

I was looking back in the thread and looked at this picture again and I wanted to point out the sweat outline on Paulus shirt  :puker: :puker: :puker:


 :shock: :shock: :lol: :lol: PUKE

Everytime I see this picture, only one thing come to mind -

"Freudian Slip"


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 10, 2007, 10:13:33 AM
RE: ARUBAN WITNESS WITH B-DAY IN DECEMBER.... this was just posted at RU
Jonathan Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2007 9:27 am   
Translation of cocaine witness PV according to "Fierljepper"

We, XX and YY, sergeants with the Korps Politie Aruba and both assigned to the Team Special Projects, decleare the following:

On Thursday 2? September, 2005, around XX:XX hours, we interrogators questioned as a witness the man named:

(name illegible)

Born on Aruba on ?? December 19?? (...) on living street 479? on Aruba.

My statement made in Papiamento, has been, by me NAME, translated into Dutch and put in writing and reads as follows:

I work as a "clerk" ??? for ??? I've recently got a job there.

To your question whether I know something about the disappearance of the American girl Natalee Holloway, I answer you as follows. I am a friend of Joran van der Sloot (with Joran we refer to suspect J.A.P. van der Sloot, remark interrogator). Joran and I both play tennis at the "Aruba Racquet Club". 


~~~~~~~~
name illegible  :roll:
Born on Aruba on ?? December 19??  :roll:


Nut44x4 Do you remember who you and Leslie had excluded? Was Santos one? TIA


Santos B-day = Also known as "Dre", born at Sao Paolo in Brazil, on October 15, 1986


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 10, 2007, 10:15:05 AM
Persistence


We have prayed with all our might
For God to please make things right
For a young woman and her family
Who have not been afforded honor and dignity

God has heard our prayers and our plea
And has now set a ship upon the sea
Persistence and a chosen crew is on the way now
With God's angels guiding them from the bow

Our hopes and our prayers are with you
We know you will do the best you can do
To find our precious angel, Natalee
If she is anywhere in that expanse of sea

Although souls are tired as it has been so long
Faith and hope are still strong
Persistent is what we have been and will continue to be
And Persistence will find and return our beloved Natalee

BY lousw @ BFN


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: WhiskeyGirl on December 10, 2007, 10:16:24 AM
What are the advantages of the 'monkey single brain cell'?

I've been reading about the monkey brain cell for some time (at other blogs/forums).

And there seem to be many things that set the monkeys apart, the brain cell is one of them.  The only thing like it I know of, is the discovery of fire...

In the time before fire, (this is not the PBS version, and sensitive readers may wish to skip this post), humans lived in a world that was dark, damp, and cold.  It made many relations difficult and food preparation almost impossible.  No BBQ or Rosemary roasted potatoes for anyone.

One day, while fleeing a burning fire, a woman remarked to her mate about how nice the fire felt on her tush.  It made her feel all warm and cozy, and sparked special warm feelings.  The man noticed.  A lightbulb went off.   :idea:

Man soon learned to store the fire and carry it from place to place.  He learned to build nice warm fires and BBQ meat, taters, and other root vegetables.

Most importantly, he learned to share the fire with others.  It was a friendly thing to do.  It helped to build good working relationships.  Sharing the fire became a way of life.  Soon, the fire led to many improvements in the human way of life.  It made everyone feel warm and cozy and and made it easier to share those special warm feelings for one another.

How does this relate to the monkey brain cell?  I believe it's how the monkeys survive and get along.  The monkeys don't live in a dark, damp world.  Monkeys live in the light.   MO

On the other hand, there are places that don't share a single brain cell.  People there always seem to be searching for fire, and not finding it.

In a nutshell, they aren't getting 'any'.  mo

The monkey brain cell is a good thing. 



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 10, 2007, 10:26:08 AM
Here you go, Anna.  I seem to be posting this message more and more often.

http://www.aruba-bb.com/viewforum.php?f=14
bakabl wrote:
Frist Im vary sorry to hear of the vary sad case of Natalee Holloway in such a wonderful place like Aruba but it could happen anywere at any time. There are a few questions that need to be asked of the two men that the FBI are questioning - 1st ask them about the drink that was given to Natalee around 3:15am Aruba Time the morring Natalee never retyrn to her hotel and ask them about what the drug was in the drink that Natalee drunk without her knowing. 2nd ask them about the boat and the 2-1/2 mile trip they took.

They should break dowm and tell the truth about are were Natalee can be found.


I am reading backward which is usually a small disaster but bumping this forward as yet another cryptic post for OceanExplorer  that we have mulled over endlessly.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: private eye on December 10, 2007, 10:26:17 AM
WTF???  I'm gone for a few hours and come back to see this??? I'm still back on page 5..will catch up in a minute. :shock: :shock:  :lol:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/pvdszipper.gif)

I was looking back in the thread and looked at this picture again and I wanted to point out the sweat outline on Paulus shirt  :puker: :puker: :puker:
:cool: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:

Eewwwwww, I didn't notice his baggage before.  :shock: :shock:

Double EEEWWW!!! It is 4:30 am!! Woke up early and haven't even finished my 1st cup of coffee...that is just too gross for words!!! Look at all the sweat too!! AAAHHH!! It's like a nightmare..lol..am I really awake? :shock:

I assume Anudder finds him quite the "Sporter Senior." Her being a Buttist as someone said, has taste of her own flavor undoubtedly. If he is a "ladies man" and he hangs out at C&C, that explains the practice of drugging the ladies:)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 10, 2007, 10:36:16 AM
Gross


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 10, 2007, 10:36:36 AM
I think we've established the Mafia involvement in the casinos and the money laundering that forms the backbone of their business.  Now, are you ready for the next step? 
ta da...
Online gambling.  Yes.  This is seldom discussed but is Aruba's dirty little secret that washes more drug money than the little casinos that line her hotel row.  The Caribbean has thousands of online casinos, and the Excelsior was one of the first!!  The profit is huge, the overhead is minimal, and it is the perfect vehicle for money laundering as it is all done digitally, moving money from one account to another to another.  It is currently illegal in the US but it is legal to gamble online in many European countries. 

The casinos are a visible front and provided the shoe in to the lucrative business of online gambling.  This is really where the money is and the base for the money laundering.  And, the US has not been able to stop it, any more than they can stop the drugs that flood into our country, or the money that flows out to pay for those drugs, siphoned through the legal businesses of online gambling in the Caribbean.

And, although Aruba has banking laws recently on the books intended to guard against money laundering, they have not prosecuted even ONE case, ever.


AZLady,

It is my understanding that online gambling is now illegal in this country through banking laws that prohibit the use of credit cards for this endeavor.  Representative Spencer Bachus of Alabama who commented on Natalee's disappearance immediately after it was known was a sponsor of this bill.  He had written one earlier version from the one enacted into law by Congress.  It was part of the Abramoff investigation as well.

But LE has a way of looking the other way from what they consider victimless crimes even though bankruptcy is often the result of careless spending in these kinds of pursuits. 

So I have no way of knowing if this law is now being enforced or not.  I certainly hope that it is and that the enforcement of it will eliminate yet another source of sleazy income for the Caribbean region which does not seem too fond of the concept of actually working for money as opposed to one big swindle or another.  Posner had a low rating for his online gambling at the time I looked at it, something like a level "C" which goes to the rate the house pays out for winnings, his being in the suspicious range of those who are cheating their customers in some way or another.  What could anyone expect from someone of his reputation and past.

Posner should be around 74 years of age now and is likely not much of a factor in anything these days but he does have a son in whose name the Casino is registered who could carry on the family "businesses" for him.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 10, 2007, 10:48:24 AM
If this could have been solved from behind a keyboard, I believe we would have done it by now.  It is going to take people actually there like OceanExplorer now.

Does anyone have that post about Mary never heard the buoy?  Maybe Ocean Explorer has never seen it and would be interested.  Not necessarily to try to look there unless there is a buoy at that exact mileage or something clicks with other information.

I don't do Shango any more so I don't have it now.

.

Anna, I think those of us behind a keyboard stand/stood a better chance of solving this than any of the PTB on Aruba. At least WE tried to get to the truth!!!!


Yes, Yapperz1, I agree that at least we are trying and not working toward a cover up.  Beth has this pretty well solved within four hours of arriving on that island.  Since then, we have not really added very much and have had quite a few wild theories to detract but on the whole have really tried with our hearts in the right places.

I guess I should have said PROOF, going to be hard for us to get any PROOF of anything, even those few facts we know to be true.  I really think this is one of those investigations that solves itself.  Had ALE only done their job of securing evidence along the way, this would have long been concluded.

Since they didn't, they seem to need all the help they can get but we know they will not accept it no matter what as evidenced by Dennis Jacobs tossing things given to him by Art Wood.

They seem to have technicalities in place to authorize them to ignore anything that doesn't work toward a dismissal of the investigation and release of the suspects.  How that can be addressed is a real problem.  I don't think they would try and convict holding a streaming video of the entire crime personally but that's just my opinion.

They have to be really looking to find anything and have to have a desire to prosecute to do so.  Remember Prosecutor has the choice to bring charges or not and is allowed to do so on the basis of serving the common good.

I can't imagine that!  No wonder they have a lower (and only slightly!  what does that tell you about the true crime rates in these countries that only try and convict on a whim like that!!!) crime rate is this is the standard for bringing charges and trying suspects in crimes.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 10, 2007, 10:50:18 AM
Another reason not to go to Aruba:

Death due to dengue


ORANJESTAD – A 26-year old woman died from dengue last week.  This woman has leukemia and had recently returned from the Netherlands, where she was treated for leukemia.  She was in remission when she came back to Aruba and a dengue infection was fatal for her.


http://www.amigoe.com/english/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 10, 2007, 10:51:45 AM
20 Most Shocking Unsolved Crimes - E Channel - Sunday, Dec. 9, 2007


Natalee was #1 at the very end of the show. I kept waiting and waiting.
Beth and Dave both had segments.  20 Most Shocking Unsolved Crimes ...The Natalee Holloway mystery is # 1 !!!!!!!!
This was actually a very good program...hope they repeat it for those who did not get to see.

This is for people who don't read back, lol.



I don't think I get E Channel but would love to see this.  If they are doing a re-run, please post about it anyone who sees it being advertised and will try to find it.

I hope ARUBA realizes this will NOT go away and that people are STILL very concerned about our citizen they made disappear and how they refuse to do one thing about it.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 10, 2007, 10:53:16 AM
Persistence


We have prayed with all our might
For God to please make things right
For a young woman and her family
Who have not been afforded honor and dignity

God has heard our prayers and our plea
And has now set a ship upon the sea
Persistence and a chosen crew is on the way now
With God's angels guiding them from the bow

Our hopes and our prayers are with you
We know you will do the best you can do
To find our precious angel, Natalee
If she is anywhere in that expanse of sea

Although souls are tired as it has been so long
Faith and hope are still strong
Persistent is what we have been and will continue to be
And Persistence will find and return our beloved Natalee

BY lousw @ BFN


Outstanding!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: AZLady on December 10, 2007, 10:54:12 AM
Anna, from what I've read, about 75% of the illegal online gambling originates from within the US.  Yes, it is illegal here, and laws have been passed that do not allow credit cards to be used for online gambling debts.  However, those who manage the online casinos have developed work arounds to get money from US gamblers in other ways and circumvent the credit cards.  They have set up bank accounts in Caribbean islands that accept wire transfers from US banks and use these to drain US online gamblers.  There's always a way to part a fool from his money, and they are expert at it.  After reading about all this, I'm tending to favor legalizing online gambling in the US and turning it over to the Las Vegas casinos.  There would be at least a semblence of oversight and reporting of the monies that changed hands.  The way it is now, there is no way to even track accurately how much money goes through these online casinos.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Helen Back on December 10, 2007, 11:01:10 AM
Hi Siverfox, Helen Back was asking if you have any links on Posner/Smid? TIA

No not directly... you have to connect the dots and follow the money...

I am assuming that this is what the separate "corruption" investigation is all about that the Dutch investigators were "also" working on when they came to Aruba.  I think perhaps father sloot was already being investigated due to his position in the judiciary as well as his past connection to the Justice Ministry == hence the first set of wiretaps ...

I think he should be very careful... If there is a mob connection at play here they do not like "loose ends and loose cannons'.... is he a liabiity?  who knows... but obviously he lost his judge opportunity prior to nat's disappearance...obviously he got special favors at the casinos and passed those on to his son... obviously he had connections in high places in government....

Remember how the mob cleaned up the casino gaming problems in the early days of vegas?  If there is a connection here then you can bet that sooner or later some "clean-up" might take place since he may have outlived his usefulness with all this publicity.

Smid's credentials on the other hand suggest that he has very deep knowledge of how things are done in the money laundering and casino business.  How in the world did the justices allow Posner to obtain the right to run a casino and happened to the missing HI manager (he is still missing, right?)... or was he ever?  maybe I got him mixed up with someone else.



Good morning monkeys and thanks Mum in Ohio and Silverfox,

I knew about the "dots" we had on Smid's expertise on money laundering, etc. , but gathered from your post you might have additional info.  It's so interesting to watch the MSM talk about this case as bungled and botched (all scratching heads) and there is no mention of the real story.  Seems everyone would prefer to slink away just dumbfounded that the case just couldn't be solved.

The real story about the corrupt justice ministers and judges, the money laundering, and drug infestation would absolutely be understood by the folks who get their news on TV, if only someone would tell them the story.

Wonder why no one on MSM has the guts to tell the true story of why this case is where is today?

Hopefully Jossy is ready to help take this story to the next level.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 10, 2007, 11:07:33 AM
Another reason not to go to Aruba:

Death due to dengue


ORANJESTAD – A 26-year old woman died from dengue last week.  This woman has leukemia and had recently returned from the Netherlands, where she was treated for leukemia.  She was in remission when she came back to Aruba and a dengue infection was fatal for her.


http://www.amigoe.com/english/



MORE can be found here:

6] St. Maarten
Date: Thu 29 Nov 2007
Source: De Telegraaf [in Dutch, trans., edited]


This year [2007], there have been 18 cases of dengue found on the
Antillean island of St. Maarten. This is the highest number of cases
of this disease ever detected on the island in a year. Therefore, a
warning has been declared.

Earlier this month [November 2007], Aruba has taken measures to
prevent a dengue outbreak.

- --
Communicated by:
ProMED-mail <promed@promedmail.org>

[A map of St. Maarten showing its location in the Caribbean can be accessed at:
<http://graphicmaps.com/webimage/countrys/namerica/caribb/stmartin.htm>.
- - Mod.TY]


-------


Aruba's death does not appear to be counted which means unreported but this site does say that often precautions are taken only after the fact and thus do not do much to stop epidemic.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 10, 2007, 11:11:29 AM
Anna, from what I've read, about 75% of the illegal online gambling originates from within the US.  Yes, it is illegal here, and laws have been passed that do not allow credit cards to be used for online gambling debts.  However, those who manage the online casinos have developed work arounds to get money from US gamblers in other ways and circumvent the credit cards.  They have set up bank accounts in Caribbean islands that accept wire transfers from US banks and use these to drain US online gamblers.  There's always a way to part a fool from his money, and they are expert at it.  After reading about all this, I'm tending to favor legalizing online gambling in the US and turning it over to the Las Vegas casinos.  There would be at least a semblance of oversight and reporting of the monies that changed hands.  The way it is now, there is no way to even track accurately how much money goes through these online casinos.


Well, a few high-profile arrests often go a long way toward stopping something that is illegal.

Better enforcement is in order but you are correct about the fool and his money and how difficult it can be to prevent some from giving it to the likes of the Michael Posners of this world.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 10, 2007, 11:13:15 AM
As difficult as it is, looking at Paulus is necessary. An international incident over these 3 punks? When does that happen.

All roads go through Paulus van der sloot. We have been distracted.

He has the most to lose. Joran could have raped 100 woman and as a minor been out and still young.

For Paulus, it's life or death.

He is suspect #1 and I think we should devote all our energy at him. How much do we really know about him?

I used to think AHATA was paying for Tacopina but now it's someone else, I'm sure of it.



Frank, when I have mentioned this here before, I got all kinds of ridicule from some of the Monkeys.  I definitely think Paulus is the main culprit and I believe "your own father" is significant.  We were told that Joran would be a scapegoat by whomever Shango/Simian is/are, and (that) (those) persons know  something about Paulus, he/she/they know Paulus is the main culprit in all this.  Sorry ugly skank.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 10, 2007, 11:14:11 AM
I believed Hans Mos.  I would have trusted that man to buy a used car from him!  Then he does this to Beth.  That was bad enough but he seems to have returned from his vacation saying he is "ending the investigation" and not just releasing J2K from suspect status.

They all seem to go to The Netherlands and return with a sort of attitude adjustment.  Maybe it's my imagination but seems Karin Janssen also did that as well as van der Straaten.

Anita's connections at the Hague.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 10, 2007, 11:19:44 AM
The Dutch are holding and refuse to extradite a suspect in the 9/11 attack on this country.  I am not sure he is even a Dutch national. 

Remember the words from Paulus the first night Beth arrived:

You have no jurisdiction!


We can't get them to extradite for crimes committed here where we do have jurisdiction.  They just refuse to do it no matter what we say as we have seen with this terrorist.  Even France cooperated far better than the Dutch in this regard.

They don't respect our system.

.

The Hague and the United Nations are two of the prejudiced, biased and worthless organizations ever formed, pawns for the likes of Bubba and the Bride of Frankenstein.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: private eye on December 10, 2007, 11:27:58 AM
If this could have been solved from behind a keyboard, I believe we would have done it by now.  It is going to take people actually there like OceanExplorer now.

Does anyone have that post about Mary never heard the buoy?  Maybe Ocean Explorer has never seen it and would be interested.  Not necessarily to try to look there unless there is a buoy at that exact mileage or something clicks with other information.

I don't do Shango any more so I don't have it now.

.

Anna, I think those of us behind a keyboard stand/stood a better chance of solving this than any of the PTB on Aruba. At least WE tried to get to the truth!!!!


Yes, Yapperz1, I agree that at least we are trying and not working toward a cover up.  Beth has this pretty well solved within four hours of arriving on that island.  Since then, we have not really added very much and have had quite a few wild theories to detract but on the whole have really tried with our hearts in the right places.

I guess I should have said PROOF, going to be hard for us to get any PROOF of anything, even those few facts we know to be true.  I really think this is one of those investigations that solves itself.  Had ALE only done their job of securing evidence along the way, this would have long been concluded.

Since they didn't, they seem to need all the help they can get but we know they will not accept it no matter what as evidenced by Dennis Jacobs tossing things given to him by Art Wood.

They seem to have technicalities in place to authorize them to ignore anything that doesn't work toward a dismissal of the investigation and release of the suspects.  How that can be addressed is a real problem.  I don't think they would try and convict holding a streaming video of the entire crime personally but that's just my opinion.

They have to be really looking to find anything and have to have a desire to prosecute to do so.  Remember Prosecutor has the choice to bring charges or not and is allowed to do so on the basis of serving the common good.

I can't imagine that!  No wonder they have a lower (and only slightly!  what does that tell you about the true crime rates in these countries that only try and convict on a whim like that!!!) crime rate is this is the standard for bringing charges and trying suspects in crimes.

.

The Monkeys are way too modest. The power of your keyboards has been and will be instrumental in solving this case because with those keyboards comes public support and pressure to force Aruba, no longer to solve the case, but rather to punish the guilty whom they absolutely know are guilty. How they do it since they have either silenced the creation of admissions or gathered and destroyed the evidence is their problem.

This public pressure can affect Aruba in other means than JUST a BOYCOTT or TARIFF. The real way to make Aruba produce the guilty is to interupt their role in drug trafficking and money laundering. Do this for one month and those people will solve the case for you. Every plane leaving to or coming from Aruba into the USA and Europe should be searched with its passengers, every boat coming from or to Aruba the same, only by boat it should be every boat leaving or coming to Aruba, no matter how small as it only takes a small boat only to ferry large amounts of cocaine from SA to Aruba, and the search and scan operation should be done by US Forces. This would not only solve the Natalee case, but show the world just how easy it actually is to shut down drug trafficking into the USA. Also included in the search should be every Dutch ship into the area waters as they are the largest exporters in the world, as well as manufacturers of XTC, and Aruba is the staging point of shipment of drugs from SA into Europe.

But the most appreciated aspect of the Monkeys is the strength and support they have been to Beth in my opinion. There has to have been days, even weeks, when Beth has been too weak, too tired, or simply prevented by the process from speaking out as she would like, when the voice of the Monkeys carried her message, buoyed her spirits, and comforted her broken heart. I wish I could think of a more female appropriate analogy, but what comes to my male oriented imagery is the cartoon Popeye, with the Monkeys being the spinach from which Beth, as played by Popeye,  gains her strength. Poor imagery no doubt, but no Monkey should ever fill that their keyboards are not effective tools in this campaign and should be proud of their participation until their last breath on earth. Monkeys are simply great in my book, the best!!!!!!!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: private eye on December 10, 2007, 11:37:31 AM
As difficult as it is, looking at Paulus is necessary. An international incident over these 3 punks? When does that happen.

All roads go through Paulus van der sloot. We have been distracted.

He has the most to lose. Joran could have raped 100 woman and as a minor been out and still young.

For Paulus, it's life or death.

He is suspect #1 and I think we should devote all our energy at him. How much do we really know about him?

I used to think AHATA was paying for Tacopina but now it's someone else, I'm sure of it.



Frank, when I have mentioned this here before, I got all kinds of ridicule from some of the Monkeys.  I definitely think Paulus is the main culprit and I believe "your own father" is significant.  We were told that Joran would be a scapegoat by whomever Shango/Simian is/are, and (that) (those) persons know  something about Paulus, he/she/they know Paulus is the main culprit in all this.  Sorry ugly skank.

I agree. The telling point to me came when Beth confronted him and his behavior within his own home, where he should have been at his strongest. A father's innate need to protect his son would have given Paulus the nerve to handle that encounter with Beth with no such obvious body language screaming his guilt. What produced than un natural confession of guilt was his shame at his own action, and the fact that that was the first time Anita was informed, by his actions, of just went down that night. Remember when she cocker her head up him at one moment to indicate that now she was getting it? And that is possibly why Joran has had the nerve to hold his own, because while he was protecting himself a little, he was primarily stepping up to the plate for his family and protecting his Dad, their Dad and husband.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Kiwi on December 10, 2007, 11:38:59 AM
Good morning all. I brought this up a few nights ago, but it was too late to really get anything going. I suggested that  prosecuting 2K now and not Joran may force them to turn on each other unless 2K are willing to let Joran run around free and party while they sit in prison for 3 long years. Plus they will always be known as the ones who committed the crime.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: private eye on December 10, 2007, 11:42:54 AM
Good morning all. I brought this up a few nights ago, but it was too late to really get anything going. I suggested that  prosecuting 2K now and not Joran may force them to turn on each other unless 2K are willing to let Joran run around free and party while they sit in prison for 3 long years. Plus they will always be known as the ones who committed the crime.

That has been my opinion, in fact it is the only current option. I wonder though does Beth have anyone with the expertise to understand the consequences of this prosecution, as there is a chance as in all prosecutions that the brothers will be found innocent.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 10, 2007, 11:47:34 AM
Good morning all. I brought this up a few nights ago, but it was too late to really get anything going. I suggested that  prosecuting 2K now and not Joran may force them to turn on each other unless 2K are willing to let Joran run around free and party while they sit in prison for 3 long years. Plus they will always be known as the ones who committed the crime.

That would be an interesting process if it were to occur.  First they have to prove she died then that the Kalpoes helped drug her, kidnap her, or helped dispose of her body after someone else killed her.  Probably difficult to prove in their court unless they find the body.  Ole Papa Sloot took care of that.  "No body, no case".



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: NYC_lover on December 10, 2007, 11:49:25 AM
Good morning all!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 10, 2007, 11:51:35 AM
Here you go, Anna.  I seem to be posting this message more and more often.

http://www.aruba-bb.com/viewforum.php?f=14
bakabl wrote:
Frist Im vary sorry to hear of the vary sad case of Natalee Holloway in such a wonderful place like Aruba but it could happen anywere at any time. There are a few questions that need to be asked of the two men that the FBI are questioning - 1st ask them about the drink that was given to Natalee around 3:15am Aruba Time the morring Natalee never retyrn to her hotel and ask them about what the drug was in the drink that Natalee drunk without her knowing. 2nd ask them about the boat and the 2-1/2 mile trip they took.

They should break dowm and tell the truth about are were Natalee can be found.


I am reading backward which is usually a small disaster but bumping this forward as yet another cryptic post for OceanExplorer  that we have mulled over endlessly.

.

Remembering this very well, as do many others.  The date escapes me, but I believe it was early in the case, iirc.  (was not able to find it using search at that site)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 10, 2007, 11:59:56 AM
I don't know if I have posted this here before or not, can't remember even with nice morning coffee from Peru.

Saw a discussion on another forum with regard to whether or not the U.S. can arrest foreign nationals, etc. on their own soil without the benefit of extradition treaties and such.

I like the comment of the comedienne Chris Rock when he says "CAN we?  Of course we can!  Who's gonna stop us?  The UN with their army?  Oh, they don't have an army?  Well, in that case. . .. . "

Of course, he is joking for this country, given the power that we have, has been the most restrained and the last aggressive in history.  We are not the ones with former colonies all over the world and as Colin Powell commented, we have shed our blood for the freedom of others asking only for land enough to bury our dead.  No nation in history has such a record.

HOWEVER, can there be a limit even to our patience?  Can we do dirty tricks legally as others are so adapt at doing?  More so now than at any time in history.  WOULD we over street crime?  Prolly not but how about the routine drugging of tourists as admitted by ALE Dennis Jacobs?  Sounds like a human rights or civil rights or both violation to me.

Anyway, here is food for thought article and applies to nothing in particular except hoping to keep the Sloots awake as night wondering what those crazy Americans might do next.

Article:


From The Sunday Times
December 2, 2007

US says it has right to kidnap British citizens
David Leppard
AMERICA has told Britain that it can "kidnap" British citizens if they are wanted for crimes in the United States.

A senior lawyer for the American government has told the Court of Appeal in London that kidnapping foreign citizens is permissible under American law because the US Supreme Court has sanctioned it.

The admission will alarm the British business community after the case of the so-called NatWest Three, bankers who were extradited to America on fraud charges. More than a dozen other British executives, including senior managers at British Airways and BAE Systems, are under investigation by the US authorities and could face criminal charges in America.

Until now it was commonly assumed that US law permitted kidnapping only in the "extraordinary rendition" of terrorist suspects.

Related Links
a.. NatWest trio allowed time to pay off debts
The American government has for the first time made it clear in a British court that the law applies to anyone, British or otherwise, suspected of a crime by Washington.

Legal experts confirmed this weekend that America viewed extradition as just one way of getting foreign suspects back to face trial. Rendition, or kidnapping, dates back to 19th-century bounty hunting and Washington believes it is still legitimate.

The US government's view emerged during a hearing involving Stanley Tollman, a former director of Chelsea football club and a friend of Baroness Thatcher, and his wife Beatrice.

The Tollmans, who control the Red Carnation hotel group and are resident in London, are wanted in America for bank fraud and tax evasion. They have been fighting extradition through the British courts.

During a hearing last month Lord Justice Moses, one of the Court of Appeal judges, asked Alun Jones QC, representing the US government, about its treatment of Gavin, Tollman's nephew. Gavin Tollman was the subject of an attempted abduction during a visit to Canada in 2005.

Jones replied that it was acceptable under American law to kidnap people if they were wanted for offences in America. "The United States does have a view about procuring people to its own shores which is not shared," he said.

He said that if a person was kidnapped by the US authorities in another country and was brought back to face charges in America, no US court could rule that the abduction was illegal and free him: "If you kidnap a person outside the United States and you bring him there, the court has no jurisdiction to refuse - it goes back to bounty hunting days in the 1860s."
Mr Justice Ouseley, a second judge, challenged Jones to be "honest about [his] position".

Jones replied: "That is United States law."

He cited the case of Humberto Alvarez Machain, a suspect who was abducted by the US government at his medical office in Guadalajara, Mexico, in 1990. He was flown by Drug Enforcement Administration agents to Texas for criminal prosecution.

Although there was an extradition treaty in place between America and Mexico at the time - as there currently is between the United States and Britain - the Supreme Court ruled in 1992 that the Mexican had no legal remedy because of his abduction.

In 2005, Gavin Tollman, the head of Trafalgar Tours, a holiday company, had arrived in Toronto by plane when he was arrested by Canadian immigration authorities.

An American prosecutor, who had tried and failed to extradite him from Britain, persuaded Canadian officials to detain him. He wanted the Canadians to drive Tollman to the border to be handed over. Tollman was escorted in handcuffs from the aircraft in Toronto, taken to prison and held for 10 days.

A Canadian judge ordered his release, ruling that the US Justice Department had set a "sinister trap" and wrongly bypassed extradition rules. Tollman returned to Britain.

Legal sources said that under traditional American justice, rendition meant capturing wanted people abroad and bringing them to the United States. The term "extraordinary rendition" was coined in the 1990s for the kidnapping of terror suspects from one foreign country to another for interrogation.

There was concern this weekend from Patrick Mercer, the Tory MP, who said: "The very idea of kidnapping is repugnant to us and we must handle these cases with extreme caution and a thorough understanding of the implications in American law."

Shami Chakrabarti, director of the human rights group Liberty, said: "This law may date back to bounty hunting days, but they should sort it out if they claim to be a civilised nation."

The US Justice Department declined to comment.

Additional reporting: Anna Mikhailova

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us and americas/article2982640.ece


Additional comment from me:

Remember Butch Cassidy & the Sundance Kid who were tracked down in the remote mountains of Bolivia by Postal Inspectors!  and forcibly extradited.

I don't see this happening in the instance of Natalee but if it could be combined with other tourists who have been drugged according to ALE, something might could come of it all.  Unlikely it would seem for a crime against one citizen on foreign soil but maybe not as impossible as it once seemed to me.

And if we are willing to offend the British, we woulnd't think twice about the Dutch with this manner of dealing with things outside the extradition treaties.  Americans seldom ask those more corrupt and inept and less successful for advice as that would rather futile and we have often gone it alone in the past and will likely continue to do so.

Just some late night reading to give that flyspeck of a nation something to think about. . . .

.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: NYC_lover on December 10, 2007, 12:03:02 PM
Anna - we were talk about Dutch are stubborn yesterday....lol...
Now there is stay in De Telegraaf, Dutch men been rougher in bed. ...lol...
http://www.telegraaf.nl/binnenland/2744661/_Nederlandse_man_slecht_in_bed__.html?p=7,2


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 10, 2007, 12:07:46 PM
Anna - we were talk about Dutch are stubborn yesterday....lol...
Now there is stay in De Telegraaf, Dutch men been rougher in bed. ...lol...
http://www.telegraaf.nl/binnenland/2744661/_Nederlandse_man_slecht_in_bed__.html?p=7,2



 :shock:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: MumInOhio on December 10, 2007, 12:08:35 PM
Good morning all!

Hello NYC_lover....I have a question, please. If Judge Wit took an oath of another court which is only an ******* to Aruba on June 1st 2005, what authority did he have to limit the search at the van der Sloots house almost 2 weeks later? TIA

Anna   Just realized he could NOT have been working on this case prior. There was no case as of June 1st!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: NYC_lover on December 10, 2007, 12:13:04 PM

Hello NYC_lover....I have a question, please. If Judge Wit took an oath of another court which is only an ******* to Aruba on June 1st 2005, what authority did he have to limit the search at the van der Sloots house almost 2 weeks later? TIA

Anna   Just realized he could NOT have been working on this case prior. There was no case as of June 1st!!

MumInOhio - Sure. This is a good question, but I don't have directly an answer. Give me few minutes.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: JA on December 10, 2007, 12:14:26 PM
I'm another that believes Paulus is one of the main reasons why this case can't be/isn't solved.  Due to his connections and job, he knows a lot of the corruption and illegal things going on in Aruba.  If Joran goes down, then he will tell, and others do not want that happening.  The 2Ks will not go down unless Joran does and they have been told this.  All they have to do is keep quiet.

I'm one of the few who still isn't sure that that is Paulus in the casino with Natalee.  To me that guy looks thinner and younger.  I also think Paulus was involved in the disposal, but not the actual drugging or sexual assault.  He also may have had something to do with not getting Natalee medical help and letting her die.  he also may have known that Joran had his eye on the MB group and was planning a little action that evening.

I also find in hard, that within the walls of the Sloot compound Val hasn't heard a lot too.  I'm surprised he hasn't spilled some info out among his friends.  Same thing with Saunder, because I think Koen knows a lot too.  Dad made sure to wisk him out of there before he opened his mouth.  Who knows, maybe Koen wanted to tell the police some things that went down, or his dad knew they could get info out of him.  The ALE was probaably fine with Koen's dad coming in because then they wouldn't have to take a possibly incriminating statement that they would later need to destroy.

I think Joran would have gone to Paulus when he got in over his head that night.  He knew Paulus would know what to do, who to contact etc.  I still find it hard to believe that they boys could have done all this on their own.  Even if they took a deceased Natalee, contacted Koen and took her out to sea, they would have gone to Paulus afterwards or before for advice.  Paulus has allowed Joran free reign; drinking, gambling, lying, providing porn, staying out till all hours, bringing girls home, and drugging them with the intent for sexual assault is all okay in Paulus' book.  Of course he'd go to Paulus.

Little did Aruba know the determination of Natalee's family.  Otherwise by mid summer of the first year this case would have been closed.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Silverfox on December 10, 2007, 12:16:01 PM
I don't know if I have posted this here before or not, can't remember even with nice morning coffee from Peru.

Saw a discussion on another forum with regard to whether or not the U.S. can arrest foreign nationals, etc. on their own soil without the benefit of extradition treaties and such.

I like the comment of the comedienne Chris Rock when he says "CAN we?  Of course we can!  Who's gonna stop us?  The UN with their army?  Oh, they don't have an army?  Well, in that case. . .. . "

Of course, he is joking for this country, given the power that we have, has been the most restrained and the last aggressive in history.  We are not the ones with former colonies all over the world and as Colin Powell commented, we have shed our blood for the freedom of others asking only for land enough to bury our dead.  No nation in history has such a record.

HOWEVER, can there be a limit even to our patience?  Can we do dirty tricks legally as others are so adapt at doing?  More so now than at any time in history.  WOULD we over street crime?  Prolly not but how about the routine drugging of tourists as admitted by ALE Dennis Jacobs?  Sounds like a human rights or civil rights or both violation to me.

Anyway, here is food for thought article and applies to nothing in particular except hoping to keep the Sloots awake as night wondering what those crazy Americans might do next.

Article:


From The Sunday Times
December 2, 2007

US says it has right to kidnap British citizens
David Leppard
AMERICA has told Britain that it can "kidnap" British citizens if they are wanted for crimes in the United States.

A senior lawyer for the American government has told the Court of Appeal in London that kidnapping foreign citizens is permissible under American law because the US Supreme Court has sanctioned it.

The admission will alarm the British business community after the case of the so-called NatWest Three, bankers who were extradited to America on fraud charges. More than a dozen other British executives, including senior managers at British Airways and BAE Systems, are under investigation by the US authorities and could face criminal charges in America.

Until now it was commonly assumed that US law permitted kidnapping only in the "extraordinary rendition" of terrorist suspects.

Related Links
a.. NatWest trio allowed time to pay off debts
The American government has for the first time made it clear in a British court that the law applies to anyone, British or otherwise, suspected of a crime by Washington.

Legal experts confirmed this weekend that America viewed extradition as just one way of getting foreign suspects back to face trial. Rendition, or kidnapping, dates back to 19th-century bounty hunting and Washington believes it is still legitimate.

The US government's view emerged during a hearing involving Stanley Tollman, a former director of Chelsea football club and a friend of Baroness Thatcher, and his wife Beatrice.

The Tollmans, who control the Red Carnation hotel group and are resident in London, are wanted in America for bank fraud and tax evasion. They have been fighting extradition through the British courts.

During a hearing last month Lord Justice Moses, one of the Court of Appeal judges, asked Alun Jones QC, representing the US government, about its treatment of Gavin, Tollman's nephew. Gavin Tollman was the subject of an attempted abduction during a visit to Canada in 2005.

Jones replied that it was acceptable under American law to kidnap people if they were wanted for offences in America. "The United States does have a view about procuring people to its own shores which is not shared," he said.

He said that if a person was kidnapped by the US authorities in another country and was brought back to face charges in America, no US court could rule that the abduction was illegal and free him: "If you kidnap a person outside the United States and you bring him there, the court has no jurisdiction to refuse - it goes back to bounty hunting days in the 1860s."
Mr Justice Ouseley, a second judge, challenged Jones to be "honest about [his] position".

Jones replied: "That is United States law."

He cited the case of Humberto Alvarez Machain, a suspect who was abducted by the US government at his medical office in Guadalajara, Mexico, in 1990. He was flown by Drug Enforcement Administration agents to Texas for criminal prosecution.

Although there was an extradition treaty in place between America and Mexico at the time - as there currently is between the United States and Britain - the Supreme Court ruled in 1992 that the Mexican had no legal remedy because of his abduction.

In 2005, Gavin Tollman, the head of Trafalgar Tours, a holiday company, had arrived in Toronto by plane when he was arrested by Canadian immigration authorities.

An American prosecutor, who had tried and failed to extradite him from Britain, persuaded Canadian officials to detain him. He wanted the Canadians to drive Tollman to the border to be handed over. Tollman was escorted in handcuffs from the aircraft in Toronto, taken to prison and held for 10 days.

A Canadian judge ordered his release, ruling that the US Justice Department had set a "sinister trap" and wrongly bypassed extradition rules. Tollman returned to Britain.

Legal sources said that under traditional American justice, rendition meant capturing wanted people abroad and bringing them to the United States. The term "extraordinary rendition" was coined in the 1990s for the kidnapping of terror suspects from one foreign country to another for interrogation.

There was concern this weekend from Patrick Mercer, the Tory MP, who said: "The very idea of kidnapping is repugnant to us and we must handle these cases with extreme caution and a thorough understanding of the implications in American law."

Shami Chakrabarti, director of the human rights group Liberty, said: "This law may date back to bounty hunting days, but they should sort it out if they claim to be a civilised nation."

The US Justice Department declined to comment.

Additional reporting: Anna Mikhailova

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us and americas/article2982640.ece


Additional comment from me:

Remember Butch Cassidy & the Sundance Kid who were tracked down in the remote mountains of Bolivia by Postal Inspectors!  and forcibly extradited.

I don't see this happening in the instance of Natalee but if it could be combined with other tourists who have been drugged according to ALE, something might could come of it all.  Unlikely it would seem for a crime against one citizen on foreign soil but maybe not as impossible as it once seemed to me.

And if we are willing to offend the British, we woulnd't think twice about the Dutch with this manner of dealing with things outside the extradition treaties.  Americans seldom ask those more corrupt and inept and less successful for advice as that would rather futile and we have often gone it alone in the past and will likely continue to do so.

Just some late night reading to give that flyspeck of a nation something to think about. . . .

.




Hey good post!!

Hey and don't forget Noriega! We sent the troops in after him! 



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: MumInOhio on December 10, 2007, 12:24:17 PM
Thanks NYC_lover....no hurry. I can't seem to find out much about these Judges back in 2005, or now for that matter. A lot of web pages in Dutch, so maybe I'm missing it! You would think there would be some reference other than the blogs!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 10, 2007, 12:28:10 PM
Good morning all!

Hello NYC_lover....I have a question, please. If Judge Wit took an oath of another court which is only an ******* to Aruba on June 1st 2005, what authority did he have to limit the search at the van der Sloots house almost 2 weeks later? TIA

Anna   Just realized he could NOT have been working on this case prior. There was no case as of June 1st!!


You are correct about no case existing prior to his being sworn in at other court.

I wish someone would submit this question to Mos as it should be investigated as misconduct on the part of a judge sworn into another court and yet issuing decrees directly in lower court.



The search did not happen until around June 15 from memory so that would have been a full two weeks after he was sworn into the regional court.

It really sucks to have a judge rule like that on searches.  That is like saying you can only show me this and this and this but not that or that and is just a glaring conflict of interest and just plain stinks.  How can a case even be prepared with judges saying what they will be shown and what they will not be shown as evidence.

Just another way to arrive at the predetermined outcome.

Corruption abounds.

MO

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: private eye on December 10, 2007, 12:29:34 PM
HS 06/04/05
Q: I would like to do a reading on the disappearance of Natalee Holloway on the island of Aruba. Please give me something to bring some closure for those who are grieving...

This is quite an interesting piece nanandjim. Now, let me apologize for the length of my reply, I find the mystery surrounding Natalee’s disappearance unsettling and intriguing.

From the psychic: “She was drugged with a local ecstasy substitute… The other men left and she hardly noticed… The white male repeated raped…. her. She was innocent to some of this and became hysterical.... So Natalee was taken on the fishing boat out to sea by someone who knew the white male and was called at about 3:30AM… The boat has blue somewhat scrolled writing on the back . It lists or slants in the water to the left somewhat when viewed from behind as it sits in the water at the public marina… a local man drove the boat straight out from the marina at about 35 mph for 32 minutes…he weighted and pushed her body overboard…Natalee has found some peace after the traumatic act. She is deeply regretful about the agony it is causing everyone (especially her mother) but what is done is done. Her body may never be found.”

This reading is pretty eerie. It is hauntingly similar to a tip posted to an Aruba forum within 5 days of Natalee's disappearance, though the tip refers to the 2 security guards held early on in the investigation. In Post 28 of thread part #2, Kahskye referred to a board (which is now closed). The link, I assume, lead to this post which was included in Reply 28:

“bakabl wrote:Frist Im vary sorry to hear of the vary sad case of Natalee Holloway in such a wonderful place like Aruba but it could happen anywere at any time. There are a few questions that need to be asked of the two men that the FBI are questioning - 1st ask them about the drink that was given to Natalee around 3:15am Aruba Time the morring Natalee never retyrn to her hotel and ask them about what the drug was in the drink that Natalee drunk without her knowing. 2nd ask them about the boat and the 2-1/2 mile trip they took. They should break dowm and tell the truth about are were Natalee can be found.”


???????????????


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Kermit on December 10, 2007, 12:30:13 PM
ANITA THIS POST IS FOR YOU HONEY ITS A SHAME WE HAVE TO KEEP MEETING LIKE THIS BUT, I STILL HAVEN'T GOTTEN MY INVITATION TO YOUR CHISTMAS PARTY:)

While the prosecutor may choose to close his file,the Van Der Sloots, in particular Anita, need to realize that this case will never be over for her, Joran, Paulus, and her other children whom she is forcing to also live this horrible lie, until she does the right thing and tells the truth. I hope years from now, when your family is torn apart and laying in ruins from this very treatable cancer, when your children are in pain and their lives ruined from the horrible neglect you have intentionally inflicted upon them, you remember this. It didn't have to be like this, you could have stepped up to the plate and helped your family, including Joran to grow and lead valuable, productive lives, but YOU REFUSED. Beth, Matt, Mrs Reynolds, and hopefully Dave are almost healed, receiving blessings from God,and Natalee is sitting with God because they turned to God instead of away from God when faced with their loss. You who have turned from God, rejecting his instructions, haven't even hit bottom yet, you are still falling from that great height but are beginning to see your fate that rest at the bottom, and I know you know the pain is certain and will be great. The sooner you do the right thing, the shorter the road back to the top is and the less the pain suffered from the fall.

Turn the channel of life, what could have been, and you might see Joran incarcerated for a while, apparently the worst thing you think can happen to him, wrongly. Keep watching and you might see Joran befriended not by "Bubba" but by a person who knows the Lord and introduces him to the Lord, enabling Joran to grow to his full potential, become a good man, a role model for his siblings, and a great father who blesses you and your family with many grandchildren. But you don't want Joran to lose 10 years of his life in jail, I see, you would rather ruin an entire life time of his, and generations to come represented by the children he as a great man and father could have had. Oh but keep watching, remember this is the channel of good people, and who are those gracious women arguing to get Joran an early release, could it be, well it is , Beth and her mother. Is this how it would play out, I am no Simian or Shango, the Aruban voo doo schams who claim to know all but tell nothing, making them real punks in my book, but it certainly is a very real and possible outcome when 2 families come together in the truth and do the right thing despite the fact that the solution to one family appears mighty bright out the window labeled doing the wrong thing. Fools gold Anita, something you in Aruba should recognize. Your family, for generations, depends on you having the wisdom to say no to fools gold, and realizing that you never do the wrong thing when you do the right thing.

I can assure you Anita, Beth and her family are going to have a great Holiday Season and wish the same to you. But it can't begin to happen to you until you do the right thing, and while they are rooting for you, only you can make the choice to begin restoring the health of your family. Merry Christmas.


"I am willing to wait out all their lives to get to the truth. I have the rest of my life to find out what has happened to Natalee." (p. 98 Beth Holloway)



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 10, 2007, 12:30:36 PM
Morning again Monkeys!!
Did Jossy spill any beans yet?!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: MumInOhio on December 10, 2007, 12:35:17 PM
Was it ever mentioned who signed the search warrant? Doesn't make sense that Wit would sign off on it and then limit it? TIA


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Kermit on December 10, 2007, 12:37:00 PM
(http://img225.imageshack.us/img225/5983/paulushandundertableqm7.jpg)


Kermit, maybe he is zipping his pants up :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Or worse, remember this guy is a pervert:::))))))) About a 15 year old intellectually and emotionally

Perhaps it is evidence Paulus & Joran cheat at the blackjack tables[/b]



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: NYC_lover on December 10, 2007, 12:37:02 PM

Hello NYC_lover....I have a question, please. If Judge Wit took an oath of another court which is only an ******* to Aruba on June 1st 2005, what authority did he have to limit the search at the van der Sloots house almost 2 weeks later? TIA

Anna   Just realized he could NOT have been working on this case prior. There was no case as of June 1st!!

MumInOhio - Sure. This is a good question, but I don't have directly an answer. Give me few minutes.

I am not really in part of the Judges work at home, but I know a Dutch judge become appointed and must get a oath by the queen of the Netherlands. What I know, there is no judge that can says anything about a search in a house, is in the Netherlands. Maybe I am wrong with this is what I know. And there is then no reason for a stop limit at a searching by a judge, in somebody this or her house.

Huiszoeking Procedure
Huiszoeking. De politie en ook andere medewerkers van justitie hebben de mogelijkheid tot huiszoeking over te gaan, indien de verdenking bestaat dat in een woning strafbare feiten worden/werden gepleegd of voorwerpen aanwezig zijn, die volgens de wetgeving in beslag genomen kunnen worden.

Huiszoekingsbevel. Men is alleen verplicht toegang tot erf of woning te verlenen, nadat een bevel tot huiszoeking is getoond door de politie (zoals vaak in Amerikaanse films te zien is).
Inhoud bevel.

De inhoud van het huiszoekingsbevel. Kan echter een vrij algemene strekking hebben, zodat adres en huisnummer van de woning er niet in staan. Voldoende is dat het bevel de machtiging van de officier van justitie (respectievelijk de Rechter-commissaris) vermeldt en tevens het doel waartoe dit bevel is uitgevaardigd. In dit geval kan dan worden overgegaan tot in beslagneming van bepaalde voorwerpen.

Translation:
Searching procedure
Searching.
The police force and employees also other of justice have the possibility to searching, of proceeding if the suspicion exists that in a house indictable offences/were committed or objects become present are, which according to the legislation be confiscated can.

Searching command. One is only obliges access to (farm) yard or house, grant after a command to searching has been shown by the police force (as in American films to frequently see is).

Contents command. The contents of the searching command are possible however a rather general scope have, so that address and house number of the house do not stand. Sufficient is that the command mentions the authorisation of the public prosecutor (respectively the judge-commissioner) and besides the aim to which this order has been issued. In this case can be proceeded then to in seizure take out of certain objects.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Kermit on December 10, 2007, 12:38:59 PM
Was it ever mentioned who signed the search warrant? Doesn't make sense that Wit would sign off on it and then limit it? TIA

Karin Janssen was responsible.

She had no problem getting the right search warrant for the security guards.

If she or anyone in her dept screwed up the search warrant, it was her responsibility to correct the mistake and go get the search warrant they needed to do the investigation.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 10, 2007, 12:40:43 PM
Thanks NYC_lover....no hurry. I can't seem to find out much about these Judges back in 2005, or now for that matter. A lot of web pages in Dutch, so maybe I'm missing it! You would think there would be some reference other than the blogs!


Have you checked in Curacao? Seems most travel in from there


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 10, 2007, 12:41:46 PM
HS 06/04/05
Q: I would like to do a reading on the disappearance of Natalee Holloway on the island of Aruba. Please give me something to bring some closure for those who are grieving...

This is quite an interesting piece nanandjim. Now, let me apologize for the length of my reply, I find the mystery surrounding Natalee’s disappearance unsettling and intriguing.

From the psychic: “She was drugged with a local ecstasy substitute… The other men left and she hardly noticed… The white male repeated raped…. her. She was innocent to some of this and became hysterical.... So Natalee was taken on the fishing boat out to sea by someone who knew the white male and was called at about 3:30AM… The boat has blue somewhat scrolled writing on the back . It lists or slants in the water to the left somewhat when viewed from behind as it sits in the water at the public marina… a local man drove the boat straight out from the marina at about 35 mph for 32 minutes…he weighted and pushed her body overboard…Natalee has found some peace after the traumatic act. She is deeply regretful about the agony it is causing everyone (especially her mother) but what is done is done. Her body may never be found.”

This reading is pretty eerie. It is hauntingly similar to a tip posted to an Aruba forum within 5 days of Natalee's disappearance, though the tip refers to the 2 security guards held early on in the investigation. In Post 28 of thread part #2, Kahskye referred to a board (which is now closed). The link, I assume, lead to this post which was included in Reply 28:

“bakabl wrote:Frist Im vary sorry to hear of the vary sad case of Natalee Holloway in such a wonderful place like Aruba but it could happen anywere at any time. There are a few questions that need to be asked of the two men that the FBI are questioning - 1st ask them about the drink that was given to Natalee around 3:15am Aruba Time the morring Natalee never retyrn to her hotel and ask them about what the drug was in the drink that Natalee drunk without her knowing. 2nd ask them about the boat and the 2-1/2 mile trip they took. They should break dowm and tell the truth about are were Natalee can be found.”


???????????????

The date of that post by bakabl, as I posted earlier, was early in the case.  The reference to the 2 held (security guards) is curious mixed in with the details mentioned AND the psychics reading.  Crazy but who knows???



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: NYC_lover on December 10, 2007, 12:42:07 PM
Thanks NYC_lover....no hurry. I can't seem to find out much about these Judges back in 2005, or now for that matter. A lot of web pages in Dutch, so maybe I'm missing it! You would think there would be some reference other than the blogs!

You are welcome MumInOhio! Well, I don't read many blogs. I have no idea about or there is stay information about Judges in blogs.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 10, 2007, 12:47:20 PM
Just found this snooping around....
ARUBA CRIMINAL LAW
November 26th, 2007
Holloway case raises questions

I received several questions from US news channels about the legal system of Aruba. Basic information can be found on this official website: click here.

From another source (about Dutch law, to a large extent similar to Aruban law): The criminal justice legal process is divided into pretrial and trial phases. In the pretrial phase, intrusive measures such as telephone taps, searches of the person or premises are conducted to secure evidence. This is tempered through the provision of an attorney and notification to the suspect of the development of the case. The trial phase can be described as an accusatorial process. The purpose of the trial is to discover the truth. The court trial lacks some elements of a purely adversarial process in that while it is the judge who asks questions at the trial, attorneys are only allowed to ask supplementary questions, cross-examination does not exist.

All prohibited acts are classified either as crimes or felonies (misdrijven), infractions or transgressions (overtredingen). The legislature determines whether an offense constitutes a crime or an infraction. Imprisonment is only imposed for serious crimes. The minimum sentence is 1 day, the maximum is 15 years. Murder sentences can be extended to 20 years. A life sentence may be imposed for murder or manslaughter with aggravating circumstances, although this is rare. The statutory limitation for serious crimes like murder is 15 years.

If you need anything further, please feel free to contact me at: Karel.Frielink@Spigthoff.com.

Karel Frielink
Curacao-based Attorney (lawyer) / Partner
TO GET TO THE ARTICLE LINKS...go here>>>
http://www.curacao-law.com/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: NYC_lover on December 10, 2007, 12:48:01 PM
Thanks NYC_lover....no hurry. I can't seem to find out much about these Judges back in 2005, or now for that matter. A lot of web pages in Dutch, so maybe I'm missing it! You would think there would be some reference other than the blogs!


Have you checked in Curacao? Seems most travel in from there

No, I didn't have check in Curacao. I know many judges come for cases, from Curacao to Aruba. That is because Curacao is greater then Aruba. And Curacao is the head island from the Dutch Antilles.
And when there is something more, what someone want to know about Curacao, please ask.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 10, 2007, 12:48:31 PM
ok...I have seen posted one of the links in the above....not the other one though.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: MumInOhio on December 10, 2007, 12:55:49 PM
Thanks NYC_lover....no hurry. I can't seem to find out much about these Judges back in 2005, or now for that matter. A lot of web pages in Dutch, so maybe I'm missing it! You would think there would be some reference other than the blogs!

You are welcome MumInOhio! Well, I don't read many blogs. I have no idea about or there is stay information about Judges in blogs.


Thanks again...NYC_lover, I don't read any blogs, but when I search for Judge Smid, it tells me to go to scared monkeys and read something that has been written here by some of us. I want to know when he was born and where, where he went to school, and where he lived and worked and when... that type of thing and I can't find it. I will keep looking....Thanks


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: NYC_lover on December 10, 2007, 01:04:56 PM

Thanks again...NYC_lover, I don't read any blogs, but when I search for Judge Smid, it tells me to go to scared monkeys and read something that has been written here by some of us. I want to know when he was born and where, where he went to school, and where he lived and worked and when... that type of thing and I can't find it. I will keep looking....Thanks

You are welcome. I want looking for it also. What is the first name for Smid? I can't more remember. I only know named a judge Bob de Wit. When I am correct.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 10, 2007, 01:07:04 PM
Rick, I think...probably Richard. Rick=nickname ... usually.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 10, 2007, 01:09:23 PM
http://www.caribbeancourtofjustice.org/default.htm


Lots of links here...has this been posted recently?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 10, 2007, 01:14:34 PM
Thanks NYC_lover....no hurry. I can't seem to find out much about these Judges back in 2005, or now for that matter. A lot of web pages in Dutch, so maybe I'm missing it! You would think there would be some reference other than the blogs!

You are welcome MumInOhio! Well, I don't read many blogs. I have no idea about or there is stay information about Judges in blogs.


Thanks again...NYC_lover, I don't read any blogs, but when I search for Judge Smid, it tells me to go to scared monkeys and read something that has been written here by some of us. I want to know when he was born and where, where he went to school, and where he lived and worked and when... that type of thing and I can't find it. I will keep looking....Thanks

Natalee's Freebirds had a nice article on the judges.  My link does not work to them any more however.  Last time I was able to read there without registering so I don't know what the problem is but that might be a place to look for information as they had some, at least a little, on each of the judges involved.

Someone have a current link to their site?

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 10, 2007, 01:15:45 PM
Rick, I think...probably Richard. Rick=nickname ... usually.

Ricardo maybe?

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: NYC_lover on December 10, 2007, 01:20:16 PM
Rick, I think...probably Richard. Rick=nickname ... usually.

Thanks, there we go.


(http://www.korps-politie-suriname.com/nieuws/nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/archief%20nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/2005/2005-09-nieuwsbronnen-internationaal/rechters.jpg)
Rick is the second person from the right side.

http://www.kennisvoorcuracao.com/index.php?pid=18&tid=24
http://www.korps-politie-suriname.com/nieuws/nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/archief%20nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/2006/2006-03-nieuwsbronnen-internationaal/2006-03-nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal.htm
http://www.korps-politie-suriname.com/nieuws/nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/archief%20nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/2005/2005-09-nieuwsbronnen-internationaal/2005-09-nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal.htm


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 10, 2007, 01:26:08 PM
Rick Smid
Oberstaatsamwalt, Dept. of Justice,
Rotterdam, The Netherlands


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 10, 2007, 01:26:13 PM
Rick, I think...probably Richard. Rick=nickname ... usually.

Thanks, there we go.


(http://www.korps-politie-suriname.com/nieuws/nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/archief%20nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/2005/2005-09-nieuwsbronnen-internationaal/rechters.jpg)
Rick is the second person from the right side.

http://www.kennisvoorcuracao.com/index.php?pid=18&tid=24
http://www.korps-politie-suriname.com/nieuws/nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/archief%20nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/2006/2006-03-nieuwsbronnen-internationaal/2006-03-nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal.htm
http://www.korps-politie-suriname.com/nieuws/nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/archief%20nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal/2005/2005-09-nieuwsbronnen-internationaal/2005-09-nieuwsbronnen%20internationaal.htm

He looks a bit like Jimmah Cahtah.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 10, 2007, 01:31:02 PM
Hey, Nut44X4.....been trying to check out pics on 96.5 website recalling your post noting 'zero' pics for CnC, Bahia, etc.  No luck, and just a few minutes ago got this:

Coppermine critical error:
Unable to connect to database !

MySQL said: Lost connection to MySQL server during query


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: dennisintn on December 10, 2007, 01:34:07 PM

[/quote]


Thanks again...NYC_lover, I don't read any blogs, but when I search for Judge Smid, it tells me to go to scared monkeys and read something that has been written here by some of us. I want to know when he was born and where, where he went to school, and where he lived and worked and when... that type of thing and I can't find it. I will keep looking....Thanks
[/quote]

mom, you might get what you need from wikipedia.  you can't take anything there as gospel but there might be leads.
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 10, 2007, 01:38:22 PM
Rick, I think...probably Richard. Rick=nickname ... usually.

Ricardo maybe?

.


Looks like it is plain ole' Rick.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 10, 2007, 01:38:58 PM
Candles & prayers for Natalee:

http://www.gratefulness.org/candles/candles.cfm?l=eng&gi=NAH


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 10, 2007, 01:39:29 PM
Hey, Nut44X4.....been trying to check out pics on 96.5 website recalling your post noting 'zero' pics for CnC, Bahia, etc.  No luck, and just a few minutes ago got this:

Coppermine critical error:
Unable to connect to database !

MySQL said: Lost connection to MySQL server during query

This is the link I use and I got in there early this morning and photos were up and I didn't find anything interesting. Now the link won't open.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 10, 2007, 01:43:25 PM
Hey, Nut44X4.....been trying to check out pics on 96.5 website recalling your post noting 'zero' pics for CnC, Bahia, etc.  No luck, and just a few minutes ago got this:

Coppermine critical error:
Unable to connect to database !

MySQL said: Lost connection to MySQL server during query

This is the link I use and I got in there early this morning and photos were up and I didn't find anything interesting. Now the link won't open.



Seems something is broken on their end, I guess.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Helen Back on December 10, 2007, 01:48:39 PM
Truthseeker2:


He looks a bit like Jimmah Cahtah.

 :lol:



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 10, 2007, 01:52:17 PM
Candles & prayers for Natalee:

http://www.gratefulness.org/candles/candles.cfm?l=eng&gi=NAH


Thank you...I get busy searching sometimes and I forget.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 10, 2007, 01:53:29 PM
Truthseeker2:


He looks a bit like Jimmah Cahtah.

 :lol:



HE DOES!! No wonder we have problems with this guy :silent: :wink: :silent: :wink: :silent:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 10, 2007, 01:54:36 PM
Truthseeker2:


He looks a bit like Jimmah Cahtah.

 :lol:



HE DOES!! No wonder we have problems with this guy :silent: :wink: :silent: :wink: :silent:

pass the peanuts


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: NYC_lover on December 10, 2007, 02:00:52 PM
Rick Smid
Oberstaatsamwalt, Dept. of Justice,
Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Oberstaatsamwalt, this look like a German word.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: private eye on December 10, 2007, 02:19:08 PM
I had the occasion to speak with Paul, Beth's brother this morning and he said he was going to be on Court TV today for those interested. He also brought up a topic and requested information that someone, possibly Frank or *******, were discussing earlier. He wants to nail down exactly who the specific Judges have been on this case and the specific act that they accomplished. I mentioned to him a post one time that I THINK mentioned that the Judge who executed and edited the Van Der Sloots search warrant and was on premises while the search was executed, was also a frequent overnight guest of the Van Der Sloots while he was there with his job and at other times. Anyone who has information concerning this he would really appreciate it if you would post so that he can review. His interview with Court TV is imminent so it might be too late to help him, but then again it might not be. Anyway, he felt like the Monkeys were the best group for him to ask for help, so I said I would post for him his thoughts.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 10, 2007, 02:33:18 PM
I had the occasion to speak with Paul, Beth's brother this morning and he said he was going to be on Court TV today for those interested. He also brought up a topic and requested information that someone, possibly Frank or *******, were discussing earlier. He wants to nail down exactly who the specific Judges have been on this case and the specific act that they accomplished. I mentioned to him a post one time that I THINK mentioned that the Judge who executed and edited the Van Der Sloots search warrant and was on premises while the search was executed, was also a frequent overnight guest of the Van Der Sloots while he was there with his job and at other times. Anyone who has information concerning this he would really appreciate it if you would post so that he can review. His interview with Court TV is imminent so it might be too late to help him, but then again it might not be. Anyway, he felt like the Monkeys were the best group for him to ask for help, so I said I would post for him his thoughts.

From Natalee's Freebirds on SMID:

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=599.msg247022#msg247022

SMID, Rick  – Reportedly a friend of PVDS who stayed at VDS home.  Judge who released J2K in September 2005.  Dutch judge in Curacao.  As a public prosecutor in the NL, participated in the Carribean Financial Task Force as expert on money laundering.

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/smidd.jpg)



WITT, Bob  – Dutch Judge ruled on 6-17-05 that Paulus van der  Sloot cannot visit Prime Suspect J. Sloot in jail, but that Joran’s Mother may do so (and she did on 6-18). Extended J2K  custody on 6-17-05, and OK’d the transfer to KIA.

(http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h291/SunFreak2/JudgeWitt.jpg)


BRINK, Dick van den  - Curacao criminal judge, Judge of Instruction, 6-12-05 who extended custody of J2K.  Released Johns & Jones(?)


KUIPERDAL, Judge J.S.  – JOI with Jones & Johns, extended custody


LANNOY, Luis de  - President of the Common Court of Appeals of Justice of the Netherlands Antilles and Aruba.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: private eye on December 10, 2007, 02:33:45 PM
In the interests of preserving Reds money? I am posting the link with an article on the judges and asking for help in determining the accuracy. Thanks in advance

http://arubanboycott.blogspot.com/2007/11/judge-smid-squid-judge-bob-wit-twit.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 10, 2007, 02:34:13 PM
I had the occasion to speak with Paul, Beth's brother this morning and he said he was going to be on Court TV today for those interested. He also brought up a topic and requested information that someone, possibly Frank or *******, were discussing earlier. He wants to nail down exactly who the specific Judges have been on this case and the specific act that they accomplished. I mentioned to him a post one time that I THINK mentioned that the Judge who executed and edited the Van Der Sloots search warrant and was on premises while the search was executed, was also a frequent overnight guest of the Van Der Sloots while he was there with his job and at other times. Anyone who has information concerning this he would really appreciate it if you would post so that he can review. His interview with Court TV is imminent so it might be too late to help him, but then again it might not be. Anyway, he felt like the Monkeys were the best group for him to ask for help, so I said I would post for him his thoughts.

SM poster Sunfreak2 compiled a lot of info that is documented in Important Case Documents thread, among which is Aruban Who's Who.  There under Judges is the following, but at this point, I cannot say whether the source was an Aruban poster back then....perhaps someone else can recall:

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=203.0


SMID, Rick  – Reportedly a friend of PVDS who stayed at VDS home.  Judge who released J2K in September 2005.  Dutch judge in Curacao.  As a public prosecutor in the NL, participated in the Carribean Financial Task Force as expert on money laundering.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 10, 2007, 02:39:37 PM
In the interests of preserving Reds money? I am posting the link with an article on the judges and asking for help in determining the accuracy. Thanks in advance

http://arubanboycott.blogspot.com/2007/11/judge-smid-squid-judge-bob-wit-twit.html

Yes, that post on the Aruban Boycott site is from Natalee's Freebirds and they do their "homework".

See my post above as well.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 10, 2007, 02:40:36 PM
Investigation of the Police Force is not necessary
by A.M. Digital

Posted: Jul 9, 2005 18:10 UTC

ORANJESTAD - The Natalee Holloway case certainly has Aruba upside down. There is a lot of pressure on the Government and on the investigating team.

According to Eric Zaandam, president of the Police union SPA, it is unfortunate that the case has not yet been solved, but more unfortunate are the negative expressions towards the police force by amongst others the Minister of Justice, Rudy Croes, and by Prime Minister Nelson Oduber.

“This is to regretted because, instead of receiving support our own Government dignitaries express themselves negatively about the police” said Zaandam. “Minister Rudy Croes even mentioned that he will bring in a police team from Curaçao to investigate their colleagues in Aruba.”

Eric Zaandam wishes for the Minister of Justice to understand once and for all that the investigating team is responsible and has to report to the Public Prosecutor, and this happens all the time. The investigating team has no obligation to report to anybody else, including the Minister of Justice. The Minister may well bring any team from abroad but the Aruba Police Force will not report to any team.

Those that wish to have information will have to knock on the door at the Public Prosecutor’s office and not interrogate any member of the investigating team, according to the union leader. Minister Croes should not try to play the police forces of other islands against the Aruba police force.

SPA learned of the intentions of the Aruba Minister of Justice when they were in Surinam to commemorate 100 years of existence of the Surinam police force. Here they advised their colleague from the Netherlands Antilles not to fall in the trap of the Aruba Minister. SPA also contacted the Netherlands Antillean Police Union on the matter.

If the Aruba Minister of Justice wants information, he will have to approach the Public Prosecutor, and not accuse any member of the investigating team of leaking information. The investigating team did not commit any crime and an investigation is not necessary.

“The Aruba Police have already cooperated with all the teams that wished to help with the investigation of the disappearance of Natalee Holloway, except Scotland Yard” said Zaandam.

In police circles it is already agreed that they will not collaborate with any team that comes in to investigate the investigating team of the Natalee Holloway case.


http://news.caribseek.com/set-up/exec/view.cgi?archive=72&num=16771


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 10, 2007, 02:44:20 PM
This isn't related to what PI is asking for but here is a site that tells about the money laundering
Caribbean Financial Action Task Force
http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:oPeu_lKd3eEJ:www.cfatf.org/eng/typoexe/casino/index.pdf+Rick+Smid+Aruba+-Natalee+-Holloway&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us

this may have been posted here before, not sure.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 10, 2007, 02:47:35 PM
Klaasend,

This has been discussed long ago, but is H. Smit the same guy as Rick Smid?  While doing searches with either spelling I found H. Smit...remembering discussing whether his name is Heinrick (or something like that)

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?action=search2

 12  Natalee Holloway / LCD Archive / Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006on: December 01, 2006, 09:24:03 PM 
Started by klaasend, Message by klaasendRelevance: 20%
JOSSY:  Court appearance yesterday.  Judge H. Smit again.  Decision should come down by next week.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 10, 2007, 02:49:21 PM
Klaasend,

This has been discussed long ago, but is H. Smit the same guy as Rick Smid?  While doing searches with either spelling I found H. Smit...remembering discussing whether his name is Heinrick (or something like that)

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?action=search2

 12  Natalee Holloway / LCD Archive / Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006on: December 01, 2006, 09:24:03 PM 
Started by klaasend, Message by klaasendRelevance: 20%
JOSSY:  Court appearance yesterday.  Judge H. Smit again.  Decision should come down by next week.


I'm fairly certain it's the same guy


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 10, 2007, 02:49:42 PM
I think the Freebirds Summary plus the SunFreak Who's Who list is about as good of information as we have on the judges.  Very difficult to even find out who made a ruling in the investigation.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Helen Back on December 10, 2007, 02:50:26 PM
I had the occasion to speak with Paul, Beth's brother this morning and he said he was going to be on Court TV today for those interested. He also brought up a topic and requested information that someone, possibly Frank or *******, were discussing earlier. He wants to nail down exactly who the specific Judges have been on this case and the specific act that they accomplished. I mentioned to him a post one time that I THINK mentioned that the Judge who executed and edited the Van Der Sloots search warrant and was on premises while the search was executed, was also a frequent overnight guest of the Van Der Sloots while he was there with his job and at other times. Anyone who has information concerning this he would really appreciate it if you would post so that he can review. His interview with Court TV is imminent so it might be too late to help him, but then again it might not be. Anyway, he felt like the Monkeys were the best group for him to ask for help, so I said I would post for him his thoughts.

SM poster Sunfreak2 compiled a lot of info that is documented in Important Case Documents thread, among which is Aruban Who's Who.  There under Judges is the following, but at this point, I cannot say whether the source was an Aruban poster back then....perhaps someone else can recall:

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=203.0


SMID, Rick  – Reportedly a friend of PVDS who stayed at VDS home.  Judge who released J2K in September 2005.  Dutch judge in Curacao.  As a public prosecutor in the NL, participated in the Carribean Financial Task Force as expert on money laundering.



Someone please correct me if I am wrong, but I believe Judge Rick Smid is also the judge who got the DNA evidence of the three suspects thrown out.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 10, 2007, 02:58:28 PM
There was never a chance of justice prevailing for Natalee Holloway. The eighteen year old American citizen never had an advocate within the Aruban investigation ... not even the prosecutors. Jossy Mansur ... an editor of an Aruban publication ... is the ONLY Aruban who has supported Natalee's family in their contention that a corrupt investigation was protecting Joran and Paulus and ... this support began very early on and ... has never wavered.

Janet

+++++++++++++++++++++++

Jossy Mansur
Scared Monkey - Front Page
December 9, 2007


http://scaredmonkeys.com/2007/12/09/jossy-mansur-provides-an-opinion-on-the-actions-of-aruban-prosecutor-hans-mos/

Jossy Mansur also made it known that DIARIO will not stop in the pursuit of the truth in the disappearance of Natalee Holloway. We asked Jossy Mansur, the managing editor of Diario, his opinion on this matter.

I wish I could give you a proper answer, but I have the same dilemma of belief in the prosecution. I don’t know how Moss could risk re-arresting the three suspects, give such confident interviews, speak with so much determination about his new evidence, and then suddenly is willing to throw in the towel and put an end to his resolve. Was it just a show, a public exhibition of “we did everything that we could, but at the end couldn’t”, prior to closing the case and attempt in the process to put up a front of “good intentions” and nothing else? It seems so from this new perspective that he himself has created. It brings to mind the opinion that “the road to hell is paved with good intentions”!

We at the DIARIO have been questioning other incomprehensible attitudes of the prosecuting department on other matters with concrete, documented facts. It has become obvious to us and to the independent part of the population that the prosecutors will only act on behalf of the government against its opponents, but never….and I will repeat NEVER against the corrupt Ministers and Parliament members of the ruling party. In short, the majority of the people in Aruba are convinced that politics has a lot to do with the prosecution’s decisions.

I said that once in an editorial against the Attorney General and she took me to court. She lost in the lower courts, appealed, and lost again in the High Court! I was upheld in that statement by four different Dutch Judges! And so was the mayor opposing party, the AVP, who said the same thing and was also taken to Court and also won their case against the Attorney General. I believe in the Judges in Aruba, but how can I continue to believe in the prosecutors when faced with such devastating facts? I am willing to uphold our system of justice, I am willing to go to great lengths to defend it because it has functioned well in most cases, but it too has to show me that it is blind to political influence and and any kind of pressure in ALL cases! And that is pathetically missing in Natalee’s case,

Mos may have thrown in the towel, or is willing to do so and not go to trial, but we at the DIARIO will never give up on the case until the truth is know about what happened to Natalee. The first thing I will order Monday morning is a total review of the case, from its incipience, and to put all the FACTS together, and that it be published, including the documents, admissions, interviews and other pertinent facts that are in our possession. We will give it our best to prove to Mos and his associates that the case cannot be closed while there is so much fact, indication and admissions in play! (Jossy Mansur)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 10, 2007, 03:02:38 PM
Star Jones on now doing a show on Natalee...Court TV.!!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: dennisintn on December 10, 2007, 03:03:43 PM
[

[/quote]

Someone please correct me if I am wrong, but I believe Judge Rick Smid is also the judge who got the DNA evidence of the three suspects thrown out.


[/quote]

which judge signed the original order allowing samples to be taken from the suspects that commited errors that allowed the samples to eventually be disallowed?
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: private eye on December 10, 2007, 03:04:35 PM
Paul called and he was expecting Court TV to call in 10 minutes, so he couldn't talk, but he did say he had his computer on and was watching scared monekys and he was very impressed, honestly, and extremely appreciative. His thought is the same as I think I saw earlier today, lets attack the people directly responsible for the actions, and discover everything about them that is possible. I would also like to add to his request that we determine if there is a procedure to correct a conflict of interest if it exists under their law. I want him to get a username and start signing on, so if you think he should now is a good time to tell him:::))))))))


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: private eye on December 10, 2007, 03:06:18 PM
I do know that he really really wants to start being a regular on here, why he isn't already I can't figure out:) Maybe we can fix this!!!!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: MumInOhio on December 10, 2007, 03:06:43 PM
Rick, I think...probably Richard. Rick=nickname ... usually.

Ricardo maybe?



.


Looks like it is plain ole' Rick.


Nut44x4...I saw H.C. Smid and I think that was from a front page post. The Caribbean Court of Justice is the one that Pita posted about that Jacob 'Bob' Wit was appointed to on June 1st 2005. Will go back and see if there is anything under Rotterdam later.

Thanks for the pic NYC_lover.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 10, 2007, 03:07:53 PM
Here is an interesting layout of the players...
http://www.freewebs.com/natalee-holloway/ahistoryofdeception.htm

THE CORRUPT ARUBA GOVERNMENT AND DUTCH JUDICIARY- A HISTORY OF DECEPTION IN THE CASE OF MISSING TEEN NATALEE HOLLOWAY


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 10, 2007, 03:09:09 PM
Paul called and he was expecting Court TV to call in 10 minutes, so he couldn't talk, but he did say he had his computer on and was watching scared monekys and he was very impressed, honestly, and extremely appreciative. His thought is the same as I think I saw earlier today, lets attack the people directly responsible for the actions, and discover everything about them that is possible. I would also like to add to his request that we determine if there is a procedure to correct a conflict of interest if it exists under their law. I want him to get a username and start signing on, so if you think he should now is a good time to tell him:::))))))))

I wish Paul would join the Monkeys.  Sharing information may be the only way left to get to the truth.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 10, 2007, 03:09:56 PM
I am going to throw up!! one of joran's lawyers on..no evidence of crime.
TJ Ward on too.
Paul on now.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Frank on December 10, 2007, 03:12:26 PM
Nut,

Fantastic blog. Must reading for anyone (most people in my life) that can't understand what has and is going on down there.

Any idea who's blog it is?



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: MumInOhio on December 10, 2007, 03:16:59 PM
Helen Back....Yes....Smid also released the suspects 2005 and 2007...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: oceanexploration on December 10, 2007, 03:17:21 PM
I fly to Aruba on Wed to reunite with the Persistence.  Then the search begins.

My God... what have we gotten into? 
I've thought through a lot of things to date which all came to a point in this one article.  This summarizes perfectly what I feared.

http://www.tni.org/detail_page.phtml?act_id=2141&username=guest@tni.org&password=9999&publish=Y (http://www.tni.org/detail_page.phtml?act_id=2141&username=guest@tni.org&password=9999&publish=Y)

Can someone PLEASE carefully read this article and give me some idea to what level I can believe what is written?  If 50% is accurate, I am seriously worried about this adventure.  The article is all about the Aruban Parliament, Free-zone / tax haven, drug trafficking, the Bankers of Cosa Nostra...Contrera's (The Cuntrera-Caruana clan specialized in laundering hundreds of millions of drug dollars), and transnational criminal holdings, and the five decades of narcotics dealings.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 10, 2007, 03:18:55 PM
Paul called and he was expecting Court TV to call in 10 minutes, so he couldn't talk, but he did say he had his computer on and was watching scared monekys and he was very impressed, honestly, and extremely appreciative. His thought is the same as I think I saw earlier today, lets attack the people directly responsible for the actions, and discover everything about them that is possible. I would also like to add to his request that we determine if there is a procedure to correct a conflict of interest if it exists under their law. I want him to get a username and start signing on, so if you think he should now is a good time to tell him:::))))))))

Yes, I think it would be great!  Not at this moment of course but after the interview!  The good thing is even if he isn't registered as a member, he can still read and print information from this site. 

Anytime he wants to register, just have him email Red or me.

red@scaredmonkeys.com

or me

smklaas@hotmail.com



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 10, 2007, 03:21:08 PM
Nut,

Fantastic blog. Must reading for anyone (most people in my life) that can't understand what has and is going on down there.

Any idea who's blog it is?



Frank...I don't think I have ever seen it and I thought I had seen them all!
I have no idea who's it is.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: private eye on December 10, 2007, 03:22:23 PM
Paul called and he was expecting Court TV to call in 10 minutes, so he couldn't talk, but he did say he had his computer on and was watching scared monekys and he was very impressed, honestly, and extremely appreciative. His thought is the same as I think I saw earlier today, lets attack the people directly responsible for the actions, and discover everything about them that is possible. I would also like to add to his request that we determine if there is a procedure to correct a conflict of interest if it exists under their law. I want him to get a username and start signing on, so if you think he should now is a good time to tell him:::))))))))

Yes, I think it would be great!  Not at this moment of course but after the interview!  The good thing is even if he isn't registered as a member, he can still read and print information from this site. 

Anytime he wants to register, just have him email Red or me.

red@scaredmonkeys.com

or me

smklaas@hotmail.com



He definitely wants to, he talked to Red just before the interview and Red said he would ask the monkeys tonight about the judges, but it seems as if the monkeys are already speaking::)) I am sending you an  email klaas if you have time please consider and give me your opinion


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 10, 2007, 03:24:49 PM
YES PAUL....please join us!!!!!! :D


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Frank on December 10, 2007, 03:26:57 PM
Nut,

I wish they could have included Jean Akers, now working in Cambodia, the vice-consul (U.S.) who was partying with the sloots after Joran's release.

She wrote back asking if she could help and when I told her why I was writing, it's now quiet.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 10, 2007, 03:27:03 PM
what a crock of sheet that was on Star Jones!!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 10, 2007, 03:29:50 PM
Poor Paul tried to explain about the judge at sloot place changing search warrant. Star says she  just can't leave it hanging like that...lets jorans lawyer say not true, every ounce was searched. Star says see thats the problem, we don't know the truth here in US.
HEEELLLOOOO!!! YES WE DO!!!
OK..how do we contact Star....she needs brought up to date!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 10, 2007, 03:31:43 PM
TJ didn't help imho either!!! Says he doesn't believe the boys killed her but that she stopped breathing or had a heart attack or fell and hit her head...HEEEELLLLOOOOOO!!!!! What did the a-holes give her that caused her to stop breathing or hit her head or have a heart attack. HOLY CRAP!!! was like the twi-light zone!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: MumInOhio on December 10, 2007, 03:32:15 PM
Nut,

Fantastic blog. Must reading for anyone (most people in my life) that can't understand what has and is going on down there.

Any idea who's blog it is?





Frank...I don't think I have ever seen it and I thought I had seen them all!
I have no idea who's it is.


Just came across that and the one that oceanexploration is referring to myself :shock:

Frank there was a visitor on the sitemeter yhe 6th from Cambodia.com!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 10, 2007, 03:33:37 PM
AAAHHH!!! did anyone else watch? I am so infuriated!!! Gotta pick up my little guy from scjhool...brb.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 10, 2007, 03:34:20 PM
Poor Paul tried to explain about the judge at sloot place changing search warrant. Star says she  just can't leave it hanging like that...lets jorans lawyer say not true, every ounce was searched. Star says see thats the problem, we don't know the truth here in US.
HEEELLLOOOO!!! YES WE DO!!!
OK..how do we contact Star....she needs brought up to date!!!!

Yes, it was searched but two years too late!!!

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 10, 2007, 03:35:55 PM
I knew about the one Ocean posted. I will let Klaas answer his questions on that one... :-|


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 10, 2007, 03:36:13 PM
Poor Paul tried to explain about the judge at sloot place changing search warrant. Star says she  just can't leave it hanging like that...lets jorans lawyer say not true, every ounce was searched. Star says see thats the problem, we don't know the truth here in US.
HEEELLLOOOO!!! YES WE DO!!!
OK..how do we contact Star....she needs brought up to date!!!!

I'm sure there's a website for Star Jones.  To be honest, I've never watched her show and wouldn't expect it gets a large audience.  Typical of a show host that hasn't a clue though.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 10, 2007, 03:37:27 PM
I fly to Aruba on Wed to reunite with the Persistence.  Then the search begins.

My God... what have we gotten into? 
I've thought through a lot of things to date which all came to a point in this one article.  This summarizes perfectly what I feared.

http://www.tni.org/detail_page.phtml?act_id=2141&username=guest@tni.org&password=9999&publish=Y (http://www.tni.org/detail_page.phtml?act_id=2141&username=guest@tni.org&password=9999&publish=Y)

Can someone PLEASE carefully read this article and give me some idea to what level I can believe what is written?  If 50% is accurate, I am seriously worried about this adventure.  The article is all about the Aruban Parliament, Free-zone / tax haven, drug trafficking, the Bankers of Cosa Nostra...Contrera's (The Cuntrera-Caruana clan specialized in laundering hundreds of millions of drug dollars), and transnational criminal holdings, and the five decades of narcotics dealings.


Didn't mean to ignore you, OceanExplorer, but we had Beth's brother live on TV and were trying to gather talking points.

Yes, that article is true but if it is any comfort, it is very old now.

So you only have to deal with second and third generation mobsters, lol, just kidding.

Michael Posner seems to be the worst of the lot and his son holds the license for the Excelsior Casino, the one Natalee was in the day she disappeared.

That is why we are all wondering just what the heck you might find on that ocean floor if you know what I mean.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 10, 2007, 03:37:29 PM
Poor Paul tried to explain about the judge at sloot place changing search warrant. Star says she  just can't leave it hanging like that...lets jorans lawyer say not true, every ounce was searched. Star says see thats the problem, we don't know the truth here in US.
HEEELLLOOOO!!! YES WE DO!!!
OK..how do we contact Star....she needs brought up to date!!!!

Yes, it was searched but two years too late!!!

.

exactly!!!! His lawyer was a piece of work!! Said he drove from c and c to light house to fishermans hut to HI..no evidence...daaahhhh!!! of a crime...could it be because they weren't there!!! and no time...jorine only had 18 minutes to commit crime and dispose of body...you have got to be kidding me!!!
OK...really have to get my little guy!! I just can't believe after 2 1/2 years he can get away with saying that crap!! Where has star been???!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Frank on December 10, 2007, 03:37:37 PM
Mum,

What? Are you kidding me?

She was contacted for the first time on the 5th!

I'm hopeful she will write back but probably professional protocol is not to respond. But visiting the sloots is okay?

Scary.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 10, 2007, 03:38:23 PM
I fly to Aruba on Wed to reunite with the Persistence.  Then the search begins.

My God... what have we gotten into? 
I've thought through a lot of things to date which all came to a point in this one article.  This summarizes perfectly what I feared.

http://www.tni.org/detail_page.phtml?act_id=2141&username=guest@tni.org&password=9999&publish=Y (http://www.tni.org/detail_page.phtml?act_id=2141&username=guest@tni.org&password=9999&publish=Y)

Can someone PLEASE carefully read this article and give me some idea to what level I can believe what is written?  If 50% is accurate, I am seriously worried about this adventure.  The article is all about the Aruban Parliament, Free-zone / tax haven, drug trafficking, the Bankers of Cosa Nostra...Contrera's (The Cuntrera-Caruana clan specialized in laundering hundreds of millions of drug dollars), and transnational criminal holdings, and the five decades of narcotics dealings.

It's all true.  Aruba has been on the State Department's travel advisory list for quite some time.  Most people don't look at that list whent hey go on vacations.  If they don't hear about the place in the news they will believe the travel brochures.  Myself, I'm boycotting Aruba.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 10, 2007, 03:39:01 PM
Poor Paul tried to explain about the judge at sloot place changing search warrant. Star says she  just can't leave it hanging like that...lets jorans lawyer say not true, every ounce was searched. Star says see thats the problem, we don't know the truth here in US.
HEEELLLOOOO!!! YES WE DO!!!
OK..how do we contact Star....she needs brought up to date!!!!

I'm sure there's a website for Star Jones.  To be honest, I've never watched her show and wouldn't expect it gets a large audience.  Typical of a show host that hasn't a clue though.

I always keep the trials on in the background..if it's a good trial on..she can get quite a bit of an audience.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 10, 2007, 03:39:37 PM
Ocean Explorer,

Earlier this mornining before the judges, we were trying to gather for you all the posts about things in the water and messages claiming to know where Natalee might be.

Hope you can read back and find those.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Magnolia on December 10, 2007, 03:44:08 PM
I fly to Aruba on Wed to reunite with the Persistence.  Then the search begins.

My God... what have we gotten into? 
I've thought through a lot of things to date which all came to a point in this one article.  This summarizes perfectly what I feared.

http://www.tni.org/detail_page.phtml?act_id=2141&username=guest@tni.org&password=9999&publish=Y (http://www.tni.org/detail_page.phtml?act_id=2141&username=guest@tni.org&password=9999&publish=Y)

Can someone PLEASE carefully read this article and give me some idea to what level I can believe what is written?  If 50% is accurate, I am seriously worried about this adventure.  The article is all about the Aruban Parliament, Free-zone / tax haven, drug trafficking, the Bankers of Cosa Nostra...Contrera's (The Cuntrera-Caruana clan specialized in laundering hundreds of millions of drug dollars), and transnational criminal holdings, and the five decades of narcotics dealings.

OE,
We have know about that article for some time.  Why do you think we are offering up
so many prayers? :lol:
I think you should know also that the casino in the Holiday Inn where Nat stayed
is owned by the Posners, part of  the Chicago Mafia.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 10, 2007, 03:44:15 PM
I fly to Aruba on Wed to reunite with the Persistence.  Then the search begins.

My God... what have we gotten into? 
I've thought through a lot of things to date which all came to a point in this one article.  This summarizes perfectly what I feared.

http://www.tni.org/detail_page.phtml?act_id=2141&username=guest@tni.org&password=9999&publish=Y (http://www.tni.org/detail_page.phtml?act_id=2141&username=guest@tni.org&password=9999&publish=Y)

Can someone PLEASE carefully read this article and give me some idea to what level I can believe what is written?  If 50% is accurate, I am seriously worried about this adventure.  The article is all about the Aruban Parliament, Free-zone / tax haven, drug trafficking, the Bankers of Cosa Nostra...Contrera's (The Cuntrera-Caruana clan specialized in laundering hundreds of millions of drug dollars), and transnational criminal holdings, and the five decades of narcotics dealings.

Yes, alot of the article is true but very old.  Why don't you send Red and email and discuss the issue, Red used to live and work in Aruba (a long time ago).


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 10, 2007, 03:45:43 PM
Private Eye - no email from you yet.

smklaas@hotmail.com


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: oceanexploration on December 10, 2007, 03:45:54 PM
Anna,

A synthesis of such would be helpful and I would definitely reference it frequently while on site.  I'm pretty sure I'll be able to tell rather swiftly which are based on fact and which are based on feeling. Perhaps a separate sticky topic with no discussion, just adds would be warranted.  Thoughts?
When all's said and done I should be able to comment on each point and discuss their validity and why.  We'll see.

BTW, it brings me no comfort that the article is old.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: oceanexploration on December 10, 2007, 03:50:00 PM
Seriously, why aren't I told these things when I'm asked to be involved in such a project? 
I really hope this doesn't turn into another "Abu Dhabi".  Nevermind the reference.  I'm not explaining it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 10, 2007, 03:50:30 PM
If Court TV thinks they can replace Nancy Grace OR Catherine Crier with the likes of Star Jones and have people be happy...they have another thing coming. Star Jones is Tabloid TV trash...MO.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: MumInOhio on December 10, 2007, 03:52:36 PM
Mum,

What? Are you kidding me?

She was contacted for the first time on the 5th!

I'm hopeful she will write back but probably professional protocol is not to respond. But visiting the sloots is okay?

Scary.


Yes I know :shock: I saw your blog. I think I checked the sitemeter around 6AM
Talk about scary too Frank...Check your computer really well. I have some weird things going on since AM of 5th. Having it all checked.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 10, 2007, 03:55:12 PM
OceanExplorer,
Aruba is only 75 sq miles but is atributed with 3% of all the cocaine coming to the U.S. going through it's ports.

Quote:

Caribbean Corridor
Approximately 22 percent of the cocaine available in the United States is transported from South America through the Caribbean to maritime POEs in the United States, particularly in southeastern states. According to IACM, of the cocaine shipments that were detected departing South America moving toward the United States via the Caribbean, most departed South America on vectors that indicated transit via either Jamaica (7% of the 22%) or Haiti/Dominican Republic (7% of the 22%). Cocaine shipments also were detected moving toward the United States on vectors that indicated transit via Puerto Rico/U.S. Virgin Islands (4% of the 22%) and Aruba/Lesser Antilles (3% of the 22%). An additional 1 percent of cocaine shipments were detected moving toward the United States via the Caribbean, although the areas through which the cocaine transited were undetermined.

http://www.usdoj.gov/ndic/pubs11/12620/cocaine.htm


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Magnolia on December 10, 2007, 03:56:41 PM
If Court TV thinks they can replace Nancy Grace OR Catherine Crier with the likes of Star Jones and have people be happy...they have another thing coming. Star Jones is Tabloid TV trash...MO.

I agree...but, Star Jones is desperately looking for an audience.
She is interested in the case.  She talked about it when she was
still on the View.  What is we sent her information and site links?
Maybe she would pick up the cause.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 10, 2007, 03:58:01 PM
I created a thread for the Ocean Search so we can discuss it in one place.  It's a sticky:

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2438.0


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: private eye on December 10, 2007, 03:59:36 PM
Paul is furious with Star Jones treatment of the interview to say the least, and has already tried to contact her. I assure you he will get a hold of her. I haven't seen the interview but he was demonstrably upset, ok, he would never say it, but he was pissed off::)))))))


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Vicki on December 10, 2007, 04:00:12 PM
I fly to Aruba on Wed to reunite with the Persistence.  Then the search begins.

My God... what have we gotten into? 
I've thought through a lot of things to date which all came to a point in this one article.  This summarizes perfectly what I feared.

http://www.tni.org/detail_page.phtml?act_id=2141&username=guest@tni.org&password=9999&publish=Y (http://www.tni.org/detail_page.phtml?act_id=2141&username=guest@tni.org&password=9999&publish=Y)

Can someone PLEASE carefully read this article and give me some idea to what level I can believe what is written?  If 50% is accurate, I am seriously worried about this adventure.  The article is all about the Aruban Parliament, Free-zone / tax haven, drug trafficking, the Bankers of Cosa Nostra...Contrera's (The Cuntrera-Caruana clan specialized in laundering hundreds of millions of drug dollars), and transnational criminal holdings, and the five decades of narcotics dealings.


Dont worry,you have angels around you, Ocean, you are truly blessed...Please dont worry...God keep you and bless you...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 10, 2007, 04:01:41 PM
Anna,

A synthesis of such would be helpful and I would definitely reference it frequently while on site.  I'm pretty sure I'll be able to tell rather swiftly which are based on fact and which are based on feeling. Perhaps a separate sticky topic with no discussion, just adds would be warranted.  Thoughts?
When all's said and done I should be able to comment on each point and discuss their validity and why.  We'll see.

BTW, it brings me no comfort that the article is old.


Well, Jossy Mansur of the Mansur group is very supportive of Beth and not believed or charged with criminal activities.  See front page post by him as he is Editor of the Diario newspaper.  Only some of his relatives appear to be shady but mostly financial things.

Posner served eight years in a federal pen I believe was convicted under RICO act, not sure.  But he is 74 yo approximately NOW.  We have never been able to locate a current photo of him and only have one from his 1970 trial era.

Other than that, the rest is in that article.  That's about all we know.  Red could tell you more. 

I'd talk it over with him if I were you but I don't think the mob would bother you.  Unless of course you got too close to their own burial ground or something, lol, just kidding!!!!

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: MumInOhio on December 10, 2007, 04:04:59 PM
www.hollowaycase.com/archive/civil_court_docs/arubancounselfile.htm


Klaas... Help please!!!I messed up the link! TIA

Scoll way down to the bottom and there is a lot of mentions of Judge Smid and the Aruban Court.  A lot of the Aruban Court decisions we know are Judge Smid.

In case anyone is interested. BBL



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: private eye on December 10, 2007, 04:05:09 PM
Surely the defense attorney did not deny that the Judge who issued the warrant was already present when the team showed up to search, and that he edited the warrant to exclude a portion of the residence. Joran had access to the entire residence at all times, and thus it was improper to exclude all but his apartment. Did they also mention that Paulus friend from the office of the prosecutor was also there, as he said, to help an old family friend Paulus, and that as a result of the disclosure of his presence, he took a leave of absence from his job in the prosecutor's office to further help his old friend. Conflicts, whereeeeeeeeeeeee:)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Patriot on December 10, 2007, 04:08:02 PM
Why would the Mafia risk exposing all this if they were involved with Nat's case? If the Mafia was involved this would of been over a long time ago. Forgetaboutit!

There is no way the VDS's are that powerful of a family. If Paulus had anything on the Mafia he would be sleeping with the fishes!


 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Helen Back on December 10, 2007, 04:08:37 PM
Nut,

Fantastic blog. Must reading for anyone (most people in my life) that can't understand what has and is going on down there.

Any idea who's blog it is?



Frank...I don't think I have ever seen it and I thought I had seen them all!
I have no idea who's it is.

Wow, I've never seen it either, but it's great.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 10, 2007, 04:08:55 PM
I created a thread for the Ocean Search so we can discuss it in one place.  It's a sticky:

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2438.0



I'm confused.  OceanExplorer, do you want posts about cryptic messages on where to search or information about mafia connections in Aruba?



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: MumInOhio on December 10, 2007, 04:09:53 PM
LOL Klaas...it worked, but you deserve the thanks anyway!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: oceanexploration on December 10, 2007, 04:14:56 PM
It's up to the moderator.  It would be useful having a thread (as was just made) for the search itself since it will soon start.  Useful information can be discussed there I suppose. Again, I'm not sure if discussion should be included there, or kept to a separate thread.  I don't care about cryptic messages.. lol.  Just useful information.   


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 10, 2007, 04:16:34 PM
Klaas...please delete my post in that new thread. I misunderstood and was confused too, I guess. Thanks.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Patriot on December 10, 2007, 04:16:42 PM
The Mafia takes care of their own. If you know what I mean.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: I dont feel tardy on December 10, 2007, 04:22:57 PM
Aruba get ready to smell the poverty as little to no americans will be gracing your shores thanks to the VDS and Kalpoes and your corrupt little island. Hans Mos is apparanlt FOS and a POS enjoy eachother you LOSERS! Can't wait until we relish here the demise of Paulus and J2K and discuss how you were made to disappear. I truly would love it. I hope TES can bring Nat home. Until then I hope Aruba sinks that place is a sh*t sandwich and everyday the locals take a bite. On another note Happy Holidays to All you monkeys here and everywhere

Peace- IDFT


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: NYC_lover on December 10, 2007, 04:27:57 PM
OceanExplorer,
Aruba is only 75 sq miles but is atributed with 3% of all the cocaine coming to the U.S. going through it's ports.

Quote:

Caribbean Corridor
Approximately 22 percent of the cocaine available in the United States is transported from South America through the Caribbean to maritime POEs in the United States, particularly in southeastern states. According to IACM, of the cocaine shipments that were detected departing South America moving toward the United States via the Caribbean, most departed South America on vectors that indicated transit via either Jamaica (7% of the 22%) or Haiti/Dominican Republic (7% of the 22%). Cocaine shipments also were detected moving toward the United States on vectors that indicated transit via Puerto Rico/U.S. Virgin Islands (4% of the 22%) and Aruba/Lesser Antilles (3% of the 22%). An additional 1 percent of cocaine shipments were detected moving toward the United States via the Caribbean, although the areas through which the cocaine transited were undetermined.

http://www.usdoj.gov/ndic/pubs11/12620/cocaine.htm

In the Netherlands there was a time, people that has done, cocaine in little tubes and then going in bananas.
But they had been caught. And btw, it was not really a good indeed, for to put in bananas, because drugs doggys smells it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: NYC_lover on December 10, 2007, 04:30:01 PM

Nut44x4...I saw H.C. Smid and I think that was from a front page post. The Caribbean Court of Justice is the one that Pita posted about that Jacob 'Bob' Wit was appointed to on June 1st 2005. Will go back and see if there is anything under Rotterdam later.

Thanks for the pic NYC_lover.

You are welcome!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: dennisintn on December 10, 2007, 04:30:24 PM
Poor Paul tried to explain about the judge at sloot place changing search warrant. Star says she  just can't leave it hanging like that...lets jorans lawyer say not true, every ounce was searched. Star says see thats the problem, we don't know the truth here in US.
HEEELLLOOOO!!! YES WE DO!!!
OK..how do we contact Star....she needs brought up to date!!!!

I'm sure there's a website for Star Jones.  To be honest, I've never watched her show and wouldn't expect it gets a large audience.  Typical of a show host that hasn't a clue though.




30 mos. we've been hearing interviews like this.  natalee's family telling the truth, the interviewer doesn't know her butt from a hole in the ground, and j2k defense attorneys lying their butts off. 
anybody remember dompig in sept. or oct. 05 saying that a complete search of the sloot compount was on their wishlist but the judges hadn't allowed it.  notice that the taco's repugnant dog didn't bother clarifying that the entire place hadn't been searched until march or april of this year, and the "forensic search" he had done was done just last week. 
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 10, 2007, 04:40:53 PM

In the Netherlands there was a time, people that has done, cocaine in little tubes and then going in bananas.
But they had been caught. And btw, it was not really a good indeed, for to put in bananas, because drugs doggys smells it.


NYC, Thanks!

And thanks for the tip about bananas.  I will remember that as well.   

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 10, 2007, 04:41:36 PM
It's up to the moderator.  It would be useful having a thread (as was just made) for the search itself since it will soon start.  Useful information can be discussed there I suppose. Again, I'm not sure if discussion should be included there, or kept to a separate thread.  I don't care about cryptic messages.. lol.  Just useful information.   

My thought about the new thread is it could be a place for us to GIVE YOU information and if you have questions you can ask us there.  Most of the back and forth discussions will end up here anyway.  Your BLOG serves as the main source for updates on the search itself. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 10, 2007, 04:43:02 PM
Maybe use this thread for placement and let Klaas or Red, San, etc., decide what is relevant to be moved to the Ocean thread, so that it is not inundated with redundant information.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: NYC_lover on December 10, 2007, 04:44:18 PM

In the Netherlands there was a time, people that has done, cocaine in little tubes and then going in bananas.
But they had been caught. And btw, it was not really a good indeed, for to put in bananas, because drugs doggys smells it.


NYC, Thanks!

And thanks for the tip about bananas.  I will remember that as well.   

.

You are welcome!
Do u had heard about that cocaine in bananas story?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: oceanexploration on December 10, 2007, 04:45:58 PM
Klaasend,

I agree.  Let's go with it.  I'll try to plug into it about twice daily.  One request... if information is posted, it's references are given.  Source and authentication is vital. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 10, 2007, 04:49:52 PM
Maybe use this thread for placement and let Klaas or Red, San, etc., decide what is relevant to be moved to the Ocean thread, so that it is not inundated with redundant information.

The only problem with that is that it require me or one of the mods to see everything and sometimes we don't.  I think pertenent links and information FOR Ocean Explorer should be posted in that thread and any questions about the links can be answered there.  It's really hard to keep up with it all, especially during holiday season. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Frank on December 10, 2007, 04:50:04 PM
Ocean Explore,

I think the paranoid factor is a little tuned up, maybe too high.

The coverup has already happened. Nobody's life is in danger except the sloots. Even the stupidest of people...

But we do see the new story being written. There is no proof a serious crime occured.

Natalee wanted to see the sharks after all right?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 10, 2007, 04:51:11 PM
Klaasend,

I agree.  Let's go with it.  I'll try to plug into it about twice daily.  One request... if information is posted, it's references are given.  Source and authentication is vital. 

OK, we are pretty good at sourcing here  :wink:  FYI, I added the link to your blog in your signature line, hope you don't mind.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 10, 2007, 04:51:49 PM

In the Netherlands there was a time, people that has done, cocaine in little tubes and then going in bananas.
But they had been caught. And btw, it was not really a good indeed, for to put in bananas, because drugs doggys smells it.


NYC, Thanks!

And thanks for the tip about bananas.  I will remember that as well.   

.

You are welcome!
Do u had heard about that cocaine in bananas story?


No, I had not heard about the bananas.  Lots of interesting things found along the Mexican border in this country used for smuggling.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 10, 2007, 04:53:10 PM
Anna,

A synthesis of such would be helpful and I would definitely reference it frequently while on site.  I'm pretty sure I'll be able to tell rather swiftly which are based on fact and which are based on feeling. Perhaps a separate sticky topic with no discussion, just adds would be warranted.  Thoughts?
When all's said and done I should be able to comment on each point and discuss their validity and why.  We'll see.

BTW, it brings me no comfort that the article is old.

Hope it helps to know you have many people praying for you!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 10, 2007, 04:53:19 PM
So should Elaine's post from last night go over there? The one re: the anonymous post? There is no link :-?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 10, 2007, 04:58:38 PM
So should Elaine's post from last night go over there? The one re: the anonymous post? There is no link :-?

We could add that and a link to the JoranBlog.  I couldn't get the comments to open this morning but it could be a memory issue on my PC.  The comments are still there.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Leslie on December 10, 2007, 05:02:10 PM
Random musings:
Judge Kuiperdal died in 2006/2007.  He was from Curacao.  We have his obit in the archives. 
Pauw en Witteman TV show from Holland with PVDS on the phone and Peter deVries in the studio:  In Dutch. 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i5RAr8nUbu8
AZLady:  I was wondering the same thing about the blurring of the casino video when PVDS pulls something off the table.  Seems odd that the only person blurred was Paul at the moment he performed his sleight of hand.  By the way, who is that blonde female standing to the left of Joran?  If I was playing poker I would not appreciate a stranger watching my cards.   I might be paranoid enough to think she was communicating with the dealer.  Call me crazy!
Still cannot figure out who the tennis playing, male born in Aruba in December, who had a new job as a clerk is.  I don't see that anyone was making a statement to police on September 22 or 29, 2005.  I am watching the Diario birthday greeting section for familiar names as this is the month of December.  I did notice that Chris Hodge - the poster known as Peeps - and the owner of the www.yadoneknow.com
website has a birthday today.  He was the person who gave up the picture of Lorenzo's "earthquake" van, even though he told us later on, that he really doesn't know Lorenzo and that picture of the skinhead man at Peeps birthday party, years ago,  certainly wasn't Lorenzo  :roll:  ( I think thou doth protest too much. )
http://www.diario-aruba.com/2007/12/10/
I am honoured to know that Paul Reynolds reads here.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 10, 2007, 05:02:33 PM
Maybe use this thread for placement and let Klaas or Red, San, etc., decide what is relevant to be moved to the Ocean thread, so that it is not inundated with redundant information.


Yes, sounds good to me!  Let's go with this one.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: oceanexploration on December 10, 2007, 05:03:02 PM
Klaasend,

That was clever, thanks for adding the signature link.  I'm new to this whole thing. Keep up the excellent work.   


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 10, 2007, 05:11:25 PM
OceanExplorer,

Not to worry, Tim Miller has been to Aruba searching several times with no problems except from the officials trying to block his efforts, not the mob to my knowledge but he might be able to offer some sort of consolation.

Just a thought.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Leslie on December 10, 2007, 05:12:37 PM
Re: the old cocaine in the bananas trick;
It is quite clever - in a shipment of real bananas there are fake bananas filled with cocaine.  After the shipment clears customs, the entire banana cargo is left to rot but the fake ones filled with cocaine are easy to spot and remove.   


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 10, 2007, 05:15:07 PM
Klaasend,

That was clever, thanks for adding the signature link.  I'm new to this whole thing. Keep up the excellent work.   

Our Klaas is simply the best!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: oceanexploration on December 10, 2007, 05:21:21 PM
Goodnight all.  I'll check in tomorrow to update, then fly on Wed.  Thanks for your help and prayers!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 10, 2007, 05:22:44 PM
Posted by Heli at RU - Star Jones transcript:

Star Jones Show 12/10 TJ Ward, Paul Reynolds TRANSCRIPT

Start Jones Show
Court TV
December 10, 2007

Transcribed from DVD Recording

Star:

The Aruban prosecutor says he will close the case by the end of the month unless he finds evidence, enough evidence to charge someone with a major crime.

Michael Archer is the forensic scientist for Joran van der Sloot's defense team and T J Ward is an investigator working with Natalee's father, Dave Holloway.

Michael, I'm actually going to start with you. When Joran and the Kalpoe brothers were re-arrested aruban authorities said they were (inaudible) because of new evidence in the case and unless I miss my guess, there was no new evidence.

Archer:

That's right Star. This was much ado about nothing. Hans Mos led us to believe there was incriminating new evidence and this was going to close the case

Star:

Is it that there was no evidence or there was not substantial enough evidence to charge somebody with anything.

Archer:

There was no new evidence. It was simply re-hashing what they had, re-interpreting cell phone conversations that could be interpreted a million different ways. With their tunnel vision, they took it their way and wanted to celebrate that and it was outrageous

Star:

So basically you're talking about looking at the same stuff, just new people looking at it

Archer:

I think that's a fair statement

Star:

I'm concerned obviously and I'm going to talk to T J and actually in a little while a member of the Holloway family about not only for your client, who obviously you all are concerned with, but this re-opens a wound for the Holloway family and sort of (inaudible) everybody else up for something which seems like a bit of PR to me

Archer:

You know Star, it's incredibly unfair to the Holloway family to lead them to believe that Natalee maybe could be found, maybe this case could be solved. It's just grossly unfair, the wrong thing for Hans Mos to have done

Star:

Well now, let's move to your client, not only do you say there's no evidence against Joran, you say the absence of evidence is very telling

Archer:

Sometimes in forensics the absence of evidence is as remarkable as the presence of evidence.

Star:

What would you expect to see? Because I know that you did almost a minute by minute walk through of the minutes leading up to Natalee's disappearance and the minutes afterwards and you found something very interesting

Archer:

I did, I drove from Carlos & Charlie's up towards the lighthouse where Natalee wanted to see the sharks, we turned around in the very parking lot they turned around in, we went to the fishermen's huts, got out, I walked the beach and then we went to the hotel, we went to Natalee's room, all the points of interest we covered and I reviewed the file from top to bottom. There's no evidence that a crime was committed, nevermind that my client, Joran van der Sloot was involved in Natalee's disappearance.

Star:

So what do you think happened then?

Archer:

I don't know, there's other explanations though other than Joran killed Natalee which everyone seems to want to celebrate and make such a big deal out of. She was intoxicated on the beach that night, that's a given. Did she go for a swim, did she drown, there's many different explanations that should be considered that I don't think were.

Star:

You also, in addition to going step by step and from place to place, you've come to the conclusion that there wasn't enough time for Joran van der Sloot to have committed any sort of act that would have led to her disappearance.

Archer:

Right, we're talking about a 17 year old kid who, by his own admission and by the videotape had had a few drinks that night

Star:

He was drunk, come on

Archer:

I'm not going to say that

Star:

He was drunk, I will

Archer:

If Joran was half drunk, somewhat intoxicated at 17, he has a window of 18 minutes to have killed Natalee, eliminated the crime scene, saw to it that every piece of forensic evidence that may have existed in the car, on his person, on his clothes disappeared and then disposed of the body in such a way that the world's greatest forensic sleuths 2-1/2 years later can't find. It's ridiculous.

Star:

You're saying it defies logic in addition to just common sense.

Archer:

That's right

Star:

Fair enough. Do you think there's a possibility that the prosecutor could change his mind by the end of the month?

Archer:

Anything's possible in this case you know based on last month's antics, sure it's a possibility. We certainly hope that's not the case. There was an appellate court ruling that the media hasn't covered that I think is very important. The Appellate Court in addressing the Kalpoe brothers release said there's no evidence that a crime was committed. There's no evidence that Natalee died as a result of foul play. Absent that evidence, you can't have suspects and hopefully Hans Mos takes that Appellate Court ruling to heart

Star:

Now you saw Joran

Archer:

I spoke to Joran, yes I was with Joran immediately when he was released from jail and I spoke to him at that point and I spoke to him shortly thereafter.

Star:

How were his spirits?

Archer:

You know, Joran is hopeful that the end of the month will bring closure to this case so this cloud does not hang over him but at the same time Joran would love to see Natalee Holloway found because he thinks it would give an explanation of what happened and eliminate this cloud of suspicion that's going to follow him for the rest of his life.

Star:

No matter what happens, let's go ahead and bring T J Ward into this, a private investigator for Dave Holloway. I know the last thing you wanted to hear T J was that this investigation was going to be closed but in some ways what occurred over the last 2 weeks has been very, very painful for the Holloway family wouldn't you agree?

T J Ward:

I would agree and thanks for having me on Star. I'd like to say that I'm not disappointed, but I am disappointed though I'm not surprised at what transpires in Aruba. I think the american people need to know that the course of what they consider an arrest in Aruba is not the same as an arrest in the United States. If you know of evidence or have evidence or witness or have information they need to know, they have the right to take you into custody and hold you for 9 days before they have to take you before a Judge and I'm real surprised since the Holland authorities have gotten involved that that transpired again. I'm real disappointed with it and I thought they had something to hang their hat on but obviously they didn't.

The mere fact that the boys were last seen with Natalee when they left Carlos & Charlie's does make them suspects and I believe they need to remain as suspects and irrespectful of whatever evidence they have or what they don't have and we don't know what all the government has because it's not public record to not only the attorneys but to people like me or any other person that's looking into this.

I understand that Tim Miller has orchestrated a foundation to bring a boat in

Star:

That's the Equusearch people, we've talking about them many times here on this show, let me just let our audience know T J; they are one of the best when it comes to searching for missing people and obviously have the resources to bring to bear and I know they have been of great assistance in Natalee's investigation. I understand the new thing that is hopefully going to happen, can you fill us in on that with this particular kind of boat, this vessel that can search the ocean floor

T J Ward:

I would say that, I believe that, I don't believe the boys killed her from the course of our investigation. I don't believe that that happened.

I think something happened to her and I think a third party, whether that's Paulus van der Sloot from some evidence that we have, may be involved in taking Natalee's body off the island or having somebody take the body off the island and this has just surprised me that they brought all 3 of the boys back in but they didn't bring Paulus van der Sloot back in, who has been arrested twice since the case originated.

Star:

I want to be clear on what I heard you say T J, you think Natalee may not have been killed in the traditional sense that we may think but that she died as a result of whatever occurred that night and in an effort to cover up her death, she was disposed of

T J Ward:

Yes, I think something happened and I've said that all along, I think Natalee either stopped breathing, had a heart attack, fell and hit her head but something happened and somebody else is involved, the boys contacted somebody else and the body was taken or disposed of off the island from information that I have that Natalee's body was taken off the island by somebody, not by the boys but I'm real surprised becaused some of the information that I have leads to Paulus van der Sloot having knowledge to this occurring.

Star:

T J I want you to hold on because I know that the Holloway family has put up with just more than any family should have to put up with so in the last few minutes I do want to be joined on the phone by Paul Reynolds who is Beth's brother, Natalee's uncle

Paul, I know that you have spoken to your family about this, what are the family's plans now that the aruban prosecutor has announced that he is probably going to close the case at the end of the month?

Paul Reynolds:

Star, first I need to tell you that we're literally shocked that these suspects have been released. We are aware and everyone knows that these suspects have lied from the beginning; they have accused each other of murder; they have led the authorities on one wild goose chase after another to cover up their crime.

The prosecutor must have had some reason to bring this case back into the light and we have one Judge who said there's reason to hold them and then another Judge says there's no reason to hold them 16 days later.

Star:

But Paul as you listen to this, you know you've heard investigators with your family, investigators with the defendant's family, I should say the suspect's family since they've never been charged, and looking at the evidence dispassionately, just looking at the evidence, it doesn't seem that there's enough to charge anyone with anything significant.

Now I know that there has always been some question as to what their veracity was from the beginning. There's no question there was some finger pointing, no question that in this country I might be looking at obstruction of justice but Paul, if in fact you can't bring the significant, the major charge would your family still want one of those minor charges to be broughtZ?

Paul Reynolds:

We want all charges to be brought and we don't consider obstruction of justice or interfering with an investigation as a minor charge. We consider that to be very serious

Star:

But in our country it is and that's a big difference. We're looking at some of the law Paul and the lying if you will, what we might call obstruction is used to enhance charges when you're in Aruba, it's not the charge that they bring you in on and then I was just looking at some information according to the prosecutor's office, they said that the immediate family did not want these men charged with minor charges, they wanted some closure and know what happened to their child

Paul Reynolds:

I think we have to look at what's available, it's clear they were lying, they interfered with this investigation and even today, the 3 suspects don't agree on what happened. Certainly that leads anyone to believe they have a high level of responsibility and they should be pursued.

The fact that these Judges are making these decisions individually with secret information causes us a great deal of concern. The night of the original Search Warrant, the search was supposed to be the entire property; it's my understanding that one of the Judges was waiting at the home of the van der Sloots and interfered in the investigation and the search by changing the criteria and only allowing the search of Joran's small apartment and not the main house where Joran had obviously been earlier that day

Star;

You know what Paul, I can't let that just hang here because that's not fair to put out bare bone allegations, that's not fair and I know you Michael definitely disagree with that

Archer:

I do disagree with it and I myself searched the property last week and I have photographs documenting where the authorities searched. To say that the authorities only searched Joran's room is completely untrue. That's a misstatement.

Star:

This is the kind of thing we've encountered Paul, Michael, T J that we over here in this country have been getting information from several different sources. I know that everybody who is having this discussion, the four of us can agree on is that the investigators from Day 1 did not do the job that would do justice for Natalee, do justice for the people who are suspected, do justice for the families. I don't think they did their job and I think that's something everybody can agree on, that this investigation was screwed from the beginning.

Archer:

I agree with you Star. 2-1/2 years later my client suffers under this cloud of suspicion and it will never go away

Star:

And Natalee's family suffers under the cloud of not having their baby with them.

Archer:

Absolutely

Star:

I want to thank Michael Archer, T J Ward, Paul Reynolds for their contribution to this discussion.

Paul Reynolds:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 10, 2007, 05:23:50 PM
ok, I am not seeing what some are seeing in regards to the blackjack table. What ever it is that appears to be a camera close up looks to me as though there is another one that looks the same at the next table.
Doesn't usually matter who sees your cards, most are played turned up so everyone knows what everyone has. One of the dealers cards is turned down and one up. Dealer has to hit until he has 17 or better and then stop so it doesn't matter whether anyone gives him/her signals or not. When I play blackjack, I keep my purse in my lap and drop my winnings in all the time. You are not allowed to touch the cards, but you can do what ever you want with your chips.
What I noticed most about the video is that the movements of paulus make him appear intoxicated to me.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 10, 2007, 05:25:55 PM
I told you the Star Jones shows was infuriating!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 10, 2007, 05:36:58 PM
(http://bestsmileys.com/angry1/5.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 10, 2007, 05:41:40 PM
18 minutes!!!!!!!!!!!! This guy is on crack :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 10, 2007, 05:45:40 PM
How come Archer didn't drive to Joran's house inbetween C&C's and the lighthouse :idea:
Buttjob.... :-x


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 10, 2007, 05:46:20 PM
 :shock:  is everyone in shock?? Hellooo...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: AZLady on December 10, 2007, 05:46:42 PM
I can't believe that Taco is parading this Michael Archer on TV as if he is really a forensic scientist.  The man is a fraud.  He's a former undertaker who was sued in court for thousands of dollars.  He's no scientist!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 10, 2007, 05:48:38 PM
I can't believe that Taco is parading this Michael Archer on TV as if he is really a forensic scientist.  The man is a fraud.  He's a former undertaker who was sued in court for thousands of dollars.  He's no scientist!!!


He talks more like a defense attorney...Joe T. must have written his script.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 10, 2007, 05:49:03 PM
18 minutes!!!!!!!!!!!! This guy is on crack :roll:

Wonder what timeline/clock he was looking at? 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 10, 2007, 05:53:58 PM
(http://bestsmileys.com/angry1/5.gif)

Love this guy!!! Kind of what I looked like!! I am still here!! Was feeling lonely too!! lol


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: AZLady on December 10, 2007, 05:54:45 PM
I can't believe that Taco is parading this Michael Archer on TV as if he is really a forensic scientist.  The man is a fraud.  He's a former undertaker who was sued in court for thousands of dollars.  He's no scientist!!!


He talks more like a defense attorney...Joe T. must have written his script.

I'm sure he did.  This is just such a joke.  Anyone who wants to know more about Archer just go to Dutchess county in NY and search their database.  He's a loser who owned a failed funeral parlor and has recently (just this year) been sued by the local credit credit union for over $35,000.  His recent wiki entry is false and his credentials are phony.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 10, 2007, 05:56:06 PM
I can't believe that Taco is parading this Michael Archer on TV as if he is really a forensic scientist.  The man is a fraud.  He's a former undertaker who was sued in court for thousands of dollars.  He's no scientist!!!


He talks more like a defense attorney...Joe T. must have written his script.

oops...I missed that!! thought he said forensic lawyer...not scientist..now that is really funny!! Can't see this guy waddling across the sand investigating anything but the donut in his hand...so sorry,...back to confession for me!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Leslie on December 10, 2007, 05:58:31 PM
:shock:  is everyone in shock?? Hellooo...
Shocked?  Nah.  It's the same old s**t.  Archer makes a claim that there was only an 18 minute window of opportunity to commit a crime (a claim that has never been suggested before) based on no evidence and Star Jones treats it as the truth, but when Paul Reynolds states the documented truth about the limited search of the VDS property, she calls him on it.   
Just ignore her.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 10, 2007, 05:59:09 PM
I can't believe that Taco is parading this Michael Archer on TV as if he is really a forensic scientist.  The man is a fraud.  He's a former undertaker who was sued in court for thousands of dollars.  He's no scientist!!!


He talks more like a defense attorney...Joe T. must have written his script.

I'm sure he did.  This is just such a joke.  Anyone who wants to know more about Archer just go to Dutchess county in NY and search their database.  He's a loser who owned a failed funeral parlor and has recently (just this year) been sued by the local credit credit union for over $35,000.  His recent wiki entry is false and his credentials are phony.

r u kidding me? And Star is asking him serious questions? So he drove around 2 1/2 years later and didn't see any evidence???!!! Then went to the sloots and took pics of what???!! holy crap., now I am really infuriated. It's like Beth said, if you didn't see it you wouldn't believe it!!! We aren't in Kansas anymore Toto...we are in the twilight zone!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 10, 2007, 06:02:53 PM
:shock:  is everyone in shock?? Hellooo...
Shocked?  Nah.  It's the same old s**t.  Archer makes a claim that there was only an 18 minute window of opportunity to commit a crime (a claim that has never been suggested before) based on no evidence and Star Jones treats it as the truth, but when Paul Reynolds states the documented truth about the limited search of the VDS property, she calls him on it.   
Just ignore her.


I meant is everyone in shock and is that why no one was posting...lol.
I can't stand Star...never could, never will. I am glad I didn't watch the show...it was bad enough reading the tranny...I could actually hear her dull, boring voice as I read the transcript...ughhh.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 10, 2007, 06:04:20 PM
I need to take a break for a bit...I screwed up that quote  :2doh:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: AZLady on December 10, 2007, 06:05:34 PM
Yeah, it's friggin' amazing!  Some guy appears out of nowhere with Taco and calls himself a forensic scientist.  Then, he claims to drive around Aruba 2 1/2 years after the crime and proclaims there is no evidence and only an impossible 18 minute window of time for the crime to have occurred.  Next, he's on TV discussing the case with Star Jones as if he's some sort of expert.  Geez...I've missed my calling.  I know more about this case and the evidence than this undertaker.  Why isn't Star calling me for an interview?  Yoo hoo, Star!  I can talk to you about this... 

friggin' amazing...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: kkate on December 10, 2007, 06:13:40 PM
Aruba get ready to smell the poverty as little to no americans will be gracing your shores thanks to the VDS and Kalpoes and your corrupt little island. Hans Mos is apparanlt FOS and a POS enjoy eachother you LOSERS! Can't wait until we relish here the demise of Paulus and J2K and discuss how you were made to disappear. I truly would love it. I hope TES can bring Nat home. Until then I hope Aruba sinks that place is a sh*t sandwich and everyday the locals take a bite. On another note Happy Holidays to All you monkeys here and everywhere

Peace- IDFT

You can count on some Canadians supporting a boycott and spreading the word too!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: JusticeforNatalee on December 10, 2007, 06:14:21 PM
http://www.courttv.com/contact/feedbackform.asp?subject_id=129&start=true

Let Star hear from you regarding the show.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: dennisintn on December 10, 2007, 06:14:41 PM
I can't believe that Taco is parading this Michael Archer on TV as if he is really a forensic scientist.  The man is a fraud.  He's a former undertaker who was sued in court for thousands of dollars.  He's no scientist!!!


He talks more like a defense attorney...Joe T. must have written his script.

I'm sure he did.  This is just such a joke.  Anyone who wants to know more about Archer just go to Dutchess county in NY and search their database.  He's a loser who owned a failed funeral parlor and has recently (just this year) been sued by the local credit credit union for over $35,000.  His recent wiki entry is false and his credentials are phony.

r u kidding me? And Star is asking him serious questions? So he drove around 2 1/2 years later and didn't see any evidence???!!! Then went to the sloots and took pics of what???!! holy crap., now I am really infuriated. It's like Beth said, if you didn't see it you wouldn't believe it!!! We aren't in Kansas anymore Toto...we are in the twilight zone!!!

the infuriating part to me is that this squirrel spouts all this garbage and people like starr just nod their heads like it was gospel.  taco. says he's got proof that sloot is totally innocent and if he's charged he'll then let it be seen.  right, sure, joe, you're completely deranged if you've got half what you say you have and then let your client be hassled, imprisoned for almost 3 yrs. without trying to convince the prosecutor with your "evidence".  i don't know any 2nd graders who would fall for that line.  but greta and starr and the rest of the media just nod their heads and move right along to the next stosry. 
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 10, 2007, 06:16:15 PM
Yeah, it's friggin' amazing!  Some guy appears out of nowhere with Taco and calls himself a forensic scientist.  Then, he claims to drive around Aruba 2 1/2 years after the crime and proclaims there is no evidence and only an impossible 18 minute window of time for the crime to have occurred.  Next, he's on TV discussing the case with Star Jones as if he's some sort of expert.  Geez...I've missed my calling.  I know more about this case and the evidence than this undertaker.  Why isn't Star calling me for an interview?  Yoo hoo, Star!  I can talk to you about this... 

friggin' amazing...

I just posted on Star's "quest book"  :roll: Doubt that one will get published. Told her if she wants the facts about the case, to visit Scared Monkeys or interview Jossy the next time.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 10, 2007, 06:17:13 PM
I can't believe that Taco is parading this Michael Archer on TV as if he is really a forensic scientist.  The man is a fraud.  He's a former undertaker who was sued in court for thousands of dollars.  He's no scientist!!!


He talks more like a defense attorney...Joe T. must have written his script.

I'm sure he did.  This is just such a joke.  Anyone who wants to know more about Archer just go to Dutchess county in NY and search their database.  He's a loser who owned a failed funeral parlor and has recently (just this year) been sued by the local credit credit union for over $35,000.  His recent wiki entry is false and his credentials are phony.

r u kidding me? And Star is asking him serious questions? So he drove around 2 1/2 years later and didn't see any evidence???!!! Then went to the sloots and took pics of what???!! holy crap., now I am really infuriated. It's like Beth said, if you didn't see it you wouldn't believe it!!! We aren't in Kansas anymore Toto...we are in the twilight zone!!!

the infuriating part to me is that this squirrel spouts all this garbage and people like starr just nod their heads like it was gospel.  taco. says he's got proof that sloot is totally innocent and if he's charged he'll then let it be seen.  right, sure, joe, you're completely deranged if you've got half what you say you have and then let your client be hassled, imprisoned for almost 3 yrs. without trying to convince the prosecutor with your "evidence".  i don't know any 2nd graders who would fall for that line.  but greta and starr and the rest of the media just nod their heads and move right along to the next stosry. 
dennisintn

I hope Jossy starts publishing what he has!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 10, 2007, 06:20:54 PM
sun-sentinel.com/news/local/caribbean/sfl-1210mysteryinaruba,0,4223474.story

South Florida Sun-Sentinel.com
Aruba prosecutor plans to close Holloway case by month's end
By DANICA COTO

Associated Press

7:24 AM EST, December 10, 2007

SAN JUAN, Puerto Rico

Aruba's chief prosecutor said he will close the case of missing American teenager Natalee Holloway by the end of the month unless his office finds that there is enough evidence to charge someone with a major crime.

The prosecutor, Hans Mos, said he would not comment about the kind of evidence his office is reviewing but that he does not anticipate finding Holloway's remains and prosecuting a case without them would be ``very hard.''

``We promised the suspects that after Dec. 31, we will not pursue the case,'' Mos told The Associated Press Friday. ``This investigation should end at a certain point.''

Holloway's parents did not return multiple messages left at their homes and on their cell phones.

No one has been formally charged in the investigation, which critics have said was botched in its early stages by Aruban authorities.

The probe has revolved around three suspects: Joran van der Sloot, a 20-year-old Dutch citizen and brothers Deepak Kalpoe, 24, and Satish Kalpoe, 21, from Surinam.

They were the last people known to see Holloway before she vanished on the night of May 30, 2005. All three, who have denied any role in her disappearance, have been arrested several times _ the latest arrests coming last month _ but released after different judges ruled there was not enough evidence to keep holding them.

Mos told the AP he will drop the case unless prosecutors in his office agree before the New Year that they have strong enough evidence to go to court.

He said he imposed the deadline himself earlier this year because he feels two years is a reasonable amount of time for bringing charges against someone.

Mos said he and the Holloway family feel pursuing a minor charge ``doesn't serve a purpose.'' A person convicted of making a body disappear, for example, would serve only six months in prison, he said.

The search for Holloway spanned more than two years and involved hundreds of volunteers, Aruban soldiers, FBI agents and even Dutch F-16 jets laden with search equipment.

``We have a strong conviction that something happened that night, and that it was a very serious thing,'' Mos said. ``The question is whether we are able to prove it.''

He said he does not anticipate ever finding Holloway's remains.

``It's very hard to try a case without a body,'' he said. ``It's not impossible, but you need substantial evidence that somebody was killed.''

Authorities have combed sand dunes, drained a pond and dove into the island's clear waters. They have detained people including a disc jockey, a casino croupier, two former hotel security guards and even van der Sloot's father, a judge in training at the time.

False leads have included blond hairs attached to a duct tape found along Aruba's coast, and a bloody mattress later linked to a dead dog.

``The Aruban prosecution is going around in circles,'' said Joseph Tacopina, one of van der Sloot's attorneys. ``They've bumbled this case from the beginning.''

In 2005, Aruba's prime minister met with Holloway's mother and said authorities made mistakes at the start of their investigation.

Holloway arrived in Aruba to celebrate her high school graduation. On the last night she was seen alive, the Mountain Brook, Alabama native attended a beach concert featuring Boyz II Men and Lauryn Hill and then ate and danced at Carlos 'N Charlie's bar and restaurant.

She never showed up for her return flight, and police found her passport in her hotel room with her packed bags.

Copyright © 2007, South Florida Sun-Sentinel


-------------


So I guess this is what happened to any of those lesser charges we have been discussing.

Apparently during their discussion, the family told Mos they are not interested in pursuing those.

. :silent:

 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Helen Back on December 10, 2007, 06:22:05 PM
Here's on thing that really chaps me....Joran's defense team is always bringing up Joran's statement that Natalee wanted to see the sharks as evidence that they took her to the beach.

Aside from the fact that every word out of his mouth is a lie......

I take the comment about taking her to see the sharks as his little smug joke with himself.  His online poker nic is shark68 or something.  If any truth from him, he took Natalee to someplace there was a poker game or gambling, like a private game where others were waiting for them to arrive.

The beach story is trumped up so much it's one of the biggest diversions.  IMO, they were never on the beach.  All about the "sharks".

Can you believe that 2 1/2 years later, Joe's crack forensic scientist drove around and didn't see any evidence?  And Star is supposed to be a lawyer.  Was she even listening?



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 10, 2007, 06:29:30 PM
Here's on thing that really chaps me....Joran's defense team is always bringing up Joran's statement that Natalee wanted to see the sharks as evidence that they took her to the beach.

Aside from the fact that every word out of his mouth is a lie......

I take the comment about taking her to see the sharks as his little smug joke with himself.  His online poker nic is shark68 or something.  If any truth from him, he took Natalee to someplace there was a poker game or gambling, like a private game where others were waiting for them to arrive.

The beach story is trumped up so much it's one of the biggest diversions.  IMO, they were never on the beach.  All about the "sharks".

Can you believe that 2 1/2 years later, Joe's crack forensic scientist drove around and didn't see any evidence?  And Star is supposed to be a lawyer.  Was she even listening?



If Natalee wanted to see sharks, it would have been back at her hotel watching CARD sharks with HER FRIENDS in the casino...not in a car with three losers at a lighthouse thats for sure!!!!!! What a-holes they are!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Helen Back on December 10, 2007, 06:37:38 PM
I asked a question this weekend, but it was slow in here.  Does anyone with boat experience have an opinion about whether Koen's family boat would be the kind of boat you could take out 2 to 3 miles? 

Thanks



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 10, 2007, 06:40:29 PM
I asked a question this weekend, but it was slow in here.  Does anyone with boat experience have an opinion about whether Koen's family boat would be the kind of boat you could take out 2 to 3 miles? 

Thanks



definitely


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Leslie on December 10, 2007, 06:43:01 PM
One of Joran's poker nics is ANGRYSHARK68.  Google it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 10, 2007, 06:44:05 PM
http://scaredmonkeys.com/2006/02/27/joran-van-der-sloots-many-stories-koens-fathers-boat-one-of-the-many/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 10, 2007, 06:51:48 PM
I asked a question this weekend, but it was slow in here.  Does anyone with boat experience have an opinion about whether Koen's family boat would be the kind of boat you could take out 2 to 3 miles? 

Thanks



Yes, of course you could.  I've taken a boat about that size from the mainland to Catalina which is approx 26 miles out.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 10, 2007, 06:52:14 PM
One of Joran's poker nics is ANGRYSHARK68.  Google it.



6 sites in NL
http://www.google.nl/search?hl=nl&q=ANGRYSHARK68&btnG=Google+zoeken&meta=


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: private eye on December 10, 2007, 06:53:55 PM
I asked a question this weekend, but it was slow in here.  Does anyone with boat experience have an opinion about whether Koen's family boat would be the kind of boat you could take out 2 to 3 miles? 

Thanks





Yes, of course you could.  I've taken a boat about that size from the mainland to Catalina which is approx 26 miles out.

I didn't know you were a water/boat person. No wonder I like you::)))))


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Blue Moon on December 10, 2007, 06:55:15 PM
I fly to Aruba on Wed to reunite with the Persistence.  Then the search begins.

My God... what have we gotten into? 
I've thought through a lot of things to date which all came to a point in this one article.  This summarizes perfectly what I feared.

http://www.tni.org/detail_page.phtml?act_id=2141&username=guest@tni.org&password=9999&publish=Y (http://www.tni.org/detail_page.phtml?act_id=2141&username=guest@tni.org&password=9999&publish=Y)

Can someone PLEASE carefully read this article and give me some idea to what level I can believe what is written?  If 50% is accurate, I am seriously worried about this adventure.  The article is all about the Aruban Parliament, Free-zone / tax haven, drug trafficking, the Bankers of Cosa Nostra...Contrera's (The Cuntrera-Caruana clan specialized in laundering hundreds of millions of drug dollars), and transnational criminal holdings, and the five decades of narcotics dealings.

I cannot comprehend this article--it is scary sitting here by myself at home reading this.  I had never seen this article before.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: private eye on December 10, 2007, 06:56:13 PM
One of Joran's poker nics is ANGRYSHARK68.  Google it.


You people amaze me, and then claim your keyboards are powerless, not:)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Helen Back on December 10, 2007, 06:58:19 PM
I asked a question this weekend, but it was slow in here.  Does anyone with boat experience have an opinion about whether Koen's family boat would be the kind of boat you could take out 2 to 3 miles? 

Thanks



I didn't know you were a water/boat person. No wonder I like you::)))))

Yes, of course you could.  I've taken a boat about that size from the mainland to Catalina which is approx 26 miles out.

Wow, ok.  Thanks, all.  Guess you can tell my limited boat experience is on the lake, not the ocean.
I've been deep sea fishing, but the boats are much larger.  Thanks.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 10, 2007, 06:59:12 PM



So I guess this is what happened to any of those lesser charges we have been discussing.

Apparently during their discussion, the family told Mos they are not interested in pursuing those.

. :silent:


Good Evening to all......I'll believe that when Beth or Dave sat it


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 10, 2007, 07:01:14 PM



So I guess this is what happened to any of those lesser charges we have been discussing.

Apparently during their discussion, the family told Mos they are not interested in pursuing those.

. :silent:


Good Evening to all......I'll believe that when Beth or Dave sat it

Hello Sunshine!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 10, 2007, 07:02:13 PM



So I guess this is what happened to any of those lesser charges we have been discussing.

Apparently during their discussion, the family told Mos they are not interested in pursuing those.

. :silent:


Good Evening to all......I'll believe that when Beth or Dave sat it

EDITing myslef...when they SAY it not sat it :shock:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 10, 2007, 07:02:52 PM



So I guess this is what happened to any of those lesser charges we have been discussing.

Apparently during their discussion, the family told Mos they are not interested in pursuing those.

. :silent:


Good Evening to all......I'll believe that when Beth or Dave sat it

Hello Sunshine!!!

Hi LD!!  anything I need to go back and read??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 10, 2007, 07:03:45 PM
I fly to Aruba on Wed to reunite with the Persistence.  Then the search begins.

My God... what have we gotten into? 
I've thought through a lot of things to date which all came to a point in this one article.  This summarizes perfectly what I feared.

http://www.tni.org/detail_page.phtml?act_id=2141&username=guest@tni.org&password=9999&publish=Y (http://www.tni.org/detail_page.phtml?act_id=2141&username=guest@tni.org&password=9999&publish=Y)

Can someone PLEASE carefully read this article and give me some idea to what level I can believe what is written?  If 50% is accurate, I am seriously worried about this adventure.  The article is all about the Aruban Parliament, Free-zone / tax haven, drug trafficking, the Bankers of Cosa Nostra...Contrera's (The Cuntrera-Caruana clan specialized in laundering hundreds of millions of drug dollars), and transnational criminal holdings, and the five decades of narcotics dealings.

I cannot comprehend this article--it is scary sitting here by myself at home reading this.  I had never seen this article before.

It's mind boggling for sure...even if it's from 1997. it's still shocking!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 10, 2007, 07:04:15 PM



So I guess this is what happened to any of those lesser charges we have been discussing.

Apparently during their discussion, the family told Mos they are not interested in pursuing those.

. :silent:


Good Evening to all......I'll believe that when Beth or Dave sat it

EDITing myslef...when they SAY it not sat it :shock:

so how is yourSLEF? lol


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 10, 2007, 07:05:11 PM
One of Joran's poker nics is ANGRYSHARK68.  Google it.


You people amaze me, and then claim your keyboards are powerless, not:)

Hi PI......Please let Paul know we want and need him here.....SOON PLEASE....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 10, 2007, 07:05:11 PM



So I guess this is what happened to any of those lesser charges we have been discussing.

Apparently during their discussion, the family told Mos they are not interested in pursuing those.

. :silent:


Good Evening to all......I'll believe that when Beth or Dave sat it

Hello Sunshine!!!

Hi LD!!  anything I need to go back and read??
  if you want to get po'd read the star jones transcript


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 10, 2007, 07:06:39 PM



So I guess this is what happened to any of those lesser charges we have been discussing.

Apparently during their discussion, the family told Mos they are not interested in pursuing those.

. :silent:


Good Evening to all......I'll believe that when Beth or Dave sat it

EDITing myslef...when they SAY it not sat it :shock:

so how is yourSLEF? lol

oh hells bells :shock:.....and I haven't EVEN had one margarita tonight..... cold fingers ....just got in


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 10, 2007, 07:09:41 PM



So I guess this is what happened to any of those lesser charges we have been discussing.

Apparently during their discussion, the family told Mos they are not interested in pursuing those.

. :silent:


Good Evening to all......I'll believe that when Beth or Dave sat it

Hello Sunshine!!!

I seem to remember someone telling Karin Jannsen something like that, but not Mos...would have to look back to before Karin left to be sure. Not sure of the wording.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 10, 2007, 07:09:43 PM

Hi LD!!  anything I need to go back and read??
  if you want to get po'd read the star jones transcript

I did.....she is now and has always been an idiot :roll:....is there not ONE TV talking head that is willing to ask and then follow up on the IMPORTANT questions and stupid statement??  What did this undertaker think he was gonna see 2 1/2 years later :roll: :roll: :roll:  I hope someone emailed her his credentials....such as they are


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 10, 2007, 07:12:03 PM
I asked a question this weekend, but it was slow in here.  Does anyone with boat experience have an opinion about whether Koen's family boat would be the kind of boat you could take out 2 to 3 miles? 

Thanks





Yes, of course you could.  I've taken a boat about that size from the mainland to Catalina which is approx 26 miles out.

I didn't know you were a water/boat person. No wonder I like you::)))))

Been a while but I spent all my teen and into my 20's on and around the water.  Sailing, motoring, fishing, skiing, etc.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 10, 2007, 07:17:43 PM
http://www.pocketfives.com/profiles/joran_sloot

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/SlootPoker1.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 10, 2007, 07:20:24 PM
http://www.sharkscope.com/index.html?username=ANGRYSHARK68&network=pokerstars

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/JoranAngryShark682.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Silverfox on December 10, 2007, 07:25:08 PM
:shock:  is everyone in shock?? Hellooo...
Shocked?  Nah.  It's the same old s**t.  Archer makes a claim that there was only an 18 minute window of opportunity to commit a crime (a claim that has never been suggested before) based on no evidence and Star Jones treats it as the truth, but when Paul Reynolds states the documented truth about the limited search of the VDS property, she calls him on it.   
Just ignore her.


Unless, of course, joran "delivered" Nat to "Papa" and "friends" and then left to do something else.... :silent:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 10, 2007, 07:25:52 PM
Looks as though Sporter has had a loooooong streak of that ole BAD luck!


 :shock:

Klaas,
would that be just his online losses?  Pretty steep for unemployed college freshman.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 10, 2007, 07:30:00 PM
Looks as though Sporter has had a loooooong streak of that ole BAD luck!


 :shock:

Klaas,
would that be just his online losses?  Pretty steep for unemployed college freshman.
:wink: That's why I wanted to post both charts.  Looking at the first one it appears he wins alot but if you look at the Party Poker totals he's not doing so well, lol  :D


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 10, 2007, 07:31:46 PM
Looks as though Sporter has had a loooooong streak of that ole BAD luck!


 :shock:

Klaas,
would that be just his online losses?  Pretty steep for unemployed college freshman.

I think he is up $9400 on the one sight.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 10, 2007, 07:40:36 PM
Looks as though Sporter has had a loooooong streak of that ole BAD luck!


 :shock:

Klaas,
would that be just his online losses?  Pretty steep for unemployed college freshman.

I think he is up $9400 on the one sight.

didn't he say he was moving to another college...all the late night poker, he is probably flunking out!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Silverfox on December 10, 2007, 07:43:51 PM
I fly to Aruba on Wed to reunite with the Persistence.  Then the search begins.

My God... what have we gotten into? 
I've thought through a lot of things to date which all came to a point in this one article.  This summarizes perfectly what I feared.

http://www.tni.org/detail_page.phtml?act_id=2141&username=guest@tni.org&password=9999&publish=Y (http://www.tni.org/detail_page.phtml?act_id=2141&username=guest@tni.org&password=9999&publish=Y)

Can someone PLEASE carefully read this article and give me some idea to what level I can believe what is written?  If 50% is accurate, I am seriously worried about this adventure.  The article is all about the Aruban Parliament, Free-zone / tax haven, drug trafficking, the Bankers of Cosa Nostra...Contrera's (The Cuntrera-Caruana clan specialized in laundering hundreds of millions of drug dollars), and transnational criminal holdings, and the five decades of narcotics dealings.

I cannot comprehend this article--it is scary sitting here by myself at home reading this.  I had never seen this article before.

It's mind boggling for sure...even if it's from 1997. it's still shocking!!

Yes, this article is the one that Aruba hates to admit exists.  It is well researched and documented and a group of us have discussed it since the first few days following Natalee's disappearance.

If there is not a copy of it in the documents section here at Scared Monkeys there should be one.  It helps keep the focus on the central reason why nat's case has not been solved.  it is a reminder that Aruba's history is as black as Organized Crime can make it.  It is not window dressing -- it is based on documented facts and evidence and some pretty darn good journalistic research.

In the early days of the disappearance some of us brought this fact up on other sites (RWV) and ere mocked and criticized to even suggest that a "conspiracy" of such enormity could possibly exist, let alone be connected somehow to Nat's demise.  Now, two and a half years later following obvious coverups, hangings, beheadings, etc., etc. people are now starting to wake up to see that Aruba is still toxic from it's past -- and made even more toxic since it is much more sophisticated in it's possible underworld conduit.

I still say to focus on the Judges and on the Ministry including the very top level(s) of government and you will find the truth to what really happened, who as responsible, and where she (Nat) might actually be.

As Private Eye says -- there is true power in your collective keyboards and you can use your knowledge, hunches and all other resources to properly solve this case.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Observer on December 10, 2007, 07:46:56 PM
Looks as though Sporter has had a loooooong streak of that ole BAD luck!


 :shock:

Klaas,
would that be just his online losses?  Pretty steep for unemployed college freshman.

I think he is up $9400 on the one sight.

He had that one big win at party poker the day before he was arrested. But I dont see it in his winnings.

AANOTILTKK            114   $8     $55     0%   $893     -   Party Poker      x
ANGRYSHARK68            32   -$12     $30     -45%   -$388     Super Tilt   PokerStars      x   x
joran9            160   $0     $24     -15%   -$72     -   iPoker      x
joran_sloot            1   -$22     $20     -100%   -$22     -   Party Poker   

Sites this user plays on
    PartyPoker AANOTILTKK [Verified]
    PokerStars angryshark68 [Verified]
    TitanPoker Joran9 [Verified]
    UltimateBet angryshark68 [Verified]
http://www.pocketfives.com/profiles/joran_sloot


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 10, 2007, 07:47:14 PM
You have to register here to view player stats:

http://www.bigstack.com/FullTiltPlayerResults/144276/joran_sloot.html

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/JoranSlootBigStack.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 10, 2007, 07:49:25 PM
http://nl.pokernews.com/nieuws/2007/4/poker-buitenlands-nieuws-results-online20apr.htm

joran_sloot uit Arnhem als 4e ($183) Een andere Amsterdammer Classicrun bleef steken op de 8e plaats.

Roughly translated:

joran_sloot arnhem as 4e ($183) another amsterdammer Classicrun stayed away twinges at 8th the place.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 10, 2007, 07:50:43 PM
Kenny Rogers  :wink:
http://tw.youtube.com/watch?v=D8o6Os0xQf8


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 10, 2007, 07:52:13 PM
http://www.nkpoker.nl/players/playerprofile.asp?id=%7B8E44A4C8-54CD-42CC-A51D-84961C88442E%7D&sendmessage=true

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/SlootPoker2.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 10, 2007, 07:58:54 PM


It's mind boggling for sure...even if it's from 1997. it's still shocking!!

Yes, this article is the one that Aruba hates to admit exists.  It is well researched and documented and a group of us have discussed it since the first few days following Natalee's disappearance.

If there is not a copy of it in the documents section here at Scared Monkeys there should be one.  It helps keep the focus on the central reason why nat's case has not been solved.  it is a reminder that Aruba's history is as black as Organized Crime can make it.  It is not window dressing -- it is based on documented facts and evidence and some pretty darn good journalistic research.

In the early days of the disappearance some of us brought this fact up on other sites (RWV) and ere mocked and criticized to even suggest that a "conspiracy" of such enormity could possibly exist, let alone be connected somehow to Nat's demise.  Now, two and a half years later following obvious coverups, hangings, beheadings, etc., etc. people are now starting to wake up to see that Aruba is still toxic from it's past -- and made even more toxic since it is much more sophisticated in it's possible underworld conduit.

I still say to focus on the Judges and on the Ministry including the very top level(s) of government and you will find the truth to what really happened, who as responsible, and where she (Nat) might actually be.

As Private Eye says -- there is true power in your collective keyboards and you can use your knowledge, hunches and all other resources to properly solve this case.

This just makes what I have been thinking more and more plausible.....I think Mos DOES have the evidence he said he did...and I think someone got to him...who I don't know..I think he was ordered, threatened, whatever to back down. To lose whatever he had.  When Vinda was interviewed she was SURE he had the goods...she stated that it had to be NEW and incriminating evidence for a judge in the NL to order the pervert held and transported to hell island.....she also said it was more difficult, as the standards were higher in the NL, to hold someone on suspicion.....I have gone over and over all this and I really think this is what happened...I think Mos was forced to NOT show the evidence....to look like a fool....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 10, 2007, 07:59:02 PM
Looks as though Sporter has had a loooooong streak of that ole BAD luck!


 :shock:

Klaas,
would that be just his online losses?  Pretty steep for unemployed college freshman.

I think he is up $9400 on the one sight.

He had that one big win at party poker the day before he was arrested. But I dont see it in his winnings.

AANOTILTKK            114   $8     $55     0%   $893     -   Party Poker      x
ANGRYSHARK68            32   -$12     $30     -45%   -$388     Super Tilt   PokerStars      x   x
joran9            160   $0     $24     -15%   -$72     -   iPoker      x
joran_sloot            1   -$22     $20     -100%   -$22     -   Party Poker   

Sites this user plays on
    PartyPoker AANOTILTKK [Verified]
    PokerStars angryshark68 [Verified]
    TitanPoker Joran9 [Verified]
    UltimateBet angryshark68 [Verified]
http://www.pocketfives.com/profiles/joran_sloot

I just added the wins minus the buy ins and it was about $9400 in wins on that sight. His losses on other sights would reduce that amount of course.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: robots on December 10, 2007, 08:00:47 PM
a couple of things

1. joran is a terrible poker player, is it any wonder he and paulus have to cheat at casino's           

2. joran is as bad at POKER as he is at telling lies -- horrendous

3. joran's grade will be horrible... too much losing at poker not enough hitting the books... instead of hitting books, he prefers to hit young girls and killing them

4. joran will run into someone that will take care of him one of these days
it aint a guess... its a promise

 :cool:




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: robots on December 10, 2007, 08:03:01 PM
many times the "WINS" at the poker sites are not real cold hard cash..
its just a way to buy into a tournament with phoney money on a future date

in other words,,, joran could not get 9000.00 in cash from one of those sites

Nawwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww.. he sucks at poker

even a blind squirrel finds a few nuts once in awhile  :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 10, 2007, 08:03:02 PM
a couple of things

1. joran is a terrible poker player, is it any wonder he and paulus have to cheat at casino's           

2. joran is as bad at POKER as he is at telling lies -- horrendous

3. joran's grade will be horrible... too much losing at poker not enough hitting the books... instead of hitting books, he prefers to hit young girls and killing them

4. joran will run into someone that will take care of him one of these days
it aint a guess... its a promise


 :cool:

I agree robots...he and the k2's are going to walk around the rest of their lives wondering who might be around the next corner...waiting for them :smt117


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 10, 2007, 08:03:21 PM
a couple of things

1. joran is a terrible poker player, is it any wonder he and paulus have to cheat at casino's           

2. joran is as bad at POKER as he is at telling lies -- horrendous

3. joran's grade will be horrible... too much losing at poker not enough hitting the books... instead of hitting books, he prefers to hit young girls and killing them

4. joran will run into someone that will take care of him one of these days
it aint a guess... its a promise

 :cool:




you know I have nothing but disgust for the sporter and bigsloot, but it is not easy to cheat at a casino and you give these two waaaay to much credit if you think they can cheat a casino!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: robots on December 10, 2007, 08:03:58 PM
in a nutshell JORAN sucks

 :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 10, 2007, 08:05:40 PM
in a nutshell JORAN sucks

 :cool:

I'll second that.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: robots on December 10, 2007, 08:06:16 PM
a couple of things

1. joran is a terrible poker player, is it any wonder he and paulus have to cheat at casino's           

2. joran is as bad at POKER as he is at telling lies -- horrendous

3. joran's grade will be horrible... too much losing at poker not enough hitting the books... instead of hitting books, he prefers to hit young girls and killing them

4. joran will run into someone that will take care of him one of these days
it aint a guess... its a promise

 :cool:




you know I have nothing but disgust for the sporter and bigsloot, but it is not easy to cheat at a casino and you give these two waaaay to much credit if you think they can cheat a casino!!!

when the dealer LETS them cheat and they are putting hands under the table during the game and they are playing against 17 and 18 year old girls........

its called cheating
it aint vegas...

 :cool: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Puzzler on December 10, 2007, 08:06:58 PM
many times the "WINS" at the poker sites are not real cold hard cash..
its just a way to buy into a tournament with phoney money on a future date

in other words,,, joran could not get 9000.00 in cash from one of those sites

Nawwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww.. he sucks at poker

even a blind squirrel finds a few nuts once in awhile  :cool:

 :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: robots on December 10, 2007, 08:07:54 PM
a couple of things

1. joran is a terrible poker player, is it any wonder he and paulus have to cheat at casino's           

2. joran is as bad at POKER as he is at telling lies -- horrendous

3. joran's grade will be horrible... too much losing at poker not enough hitting the books... instead of hitting books, he prefers to hit young girls and killing them

4. joran will run into someone that will take care of him one of these days
it aint a guess... its a promise

 :cool:




you know I have nothing but disgust for the sporter and bigsloot, but it is not easy to cheat at a casino and you give these two waaaay to much credit if you think they can cheat a casino!!!

i hear ya, but we are talking about aruba... remember

they let all kinds of things slide.......
my money says the dealer and the casino KNEW joran was in on the scam with the dealer
 :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 10, 2007, 08:08:24 PM
a couple of things

1. joran is a terrible poker player, is it any wonder he and paulus have to cheat at casino's           

2. joran is as bad at POKER as he is at telling lies -- horrendous

3. joran's grade will be horrible... too much losing at poker not enough hitting the books... instead of hitting books, he prefers to hit young girls and killing them

4. joran will run into someone that will take care of him one of these days
it aint a guess... its a promise

 :cool:




you know I have nothing but disgust for the sporter and bigsloot, but it is not easy to cheat at a casino and you give these two waaaay to much credit if you think they can cheat a casino!!!

when the dealer LETS them cheat and they are putting hands under the table during the game and they are playing against 17 and 18 year old girls........

its called cheating
it aint vegas...

 :cool: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink:

in blackjack, you aren't allowed to touch the cards, you can do what you want with your chips, so whatever he was doing under the table may have been immoral, but it wasn't illegal..lol. Poker you can't take your hands off of the table, blackjack you can.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: robots on December 10, 2007, 08:09:57 PM
a couple of things

1. joran is a terrible poker player, is it any wonder he and paulus have to cheat at casino's           

2. joran is as bad at POKER as he is at telling lies -- horrendous

3. joran's grade will be horrible... too much losing at poker not enough hitting the books... instead of hitting books, he prefers to hit young girls and killing them

4. joran will run into someone that will take care of him one of these days
it aint a guess... its a promise

 :cool:




you know I have nothing but disgust for the sporter and bigsloot, but it is not easy to cheat at a casino and you give these two waaaay to much credit if you think they can cheat a casino!!!

cheating in vegas... tough to do  :cool:

cheating in aruba.... just another day in hell hole paradise  :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Silverfox on December 10, 2007, 08:09:58 PM


It's mind boggling for sure...even if it's from 1997. it's still shocking!!

Yes, this article is the one that Aruba hates to admit exists.  It is well researched and documented and a group of us have discussed it since the first few days following Natalee's disappearance.

If there is not a copy of it in the documents section here at Scared Monkeys there should be one.  It helps keep the focus on the central reason why nat's case has not been solved.  it is a reminder that Aruba's history is as black as Organized Crime can make it.  It is not window dressing -- it is based on documented facts and evidence and some pretty darn good journalistic research.

In the early days of the disappearance some of us brought this fact up on other sites (RWV) and ere mocked and criticized to even suggest that a "conspiracy" of such enormity could possibly exist, let alone be connected somehow to Nat's demise.  Now, two and a half years later following obvious coverups, hangings, beheadings, etc., etc. people are now starting to wake up to see that Aruba is still toxic from it's past -- and made even more toxic since it is much more sophisticated in it's possible underworld conduit.

I still say to focus on the Judges and on the Ministry including the very top level(s) of government and you will find the truth to what really happened, who as responsible, and where she (Nat) might actually be.

As Private Eye says -- there is true power in your collective keyboards and you can use your knowledge, hunches and all other resources to properly solve this case.

This just makes what I have been thinking more and more plausible.....I think Mos DOES have the evidence he said he did...and I think someone got to him...who I don't know..I think he was ordered, threatened, whatever to back down. To lose whatever he had.  When Vinda was interviewed she was SURE he had the goods...she stated that it had to be NEW and incriminating evidence for a judge in the NL to order the pervert held and transported to hell island.....she also said it was more difficult, as the standards were higher in the NL, to hold someone on suspicion.....I have gone over and over all this and I really think this is what happened...I think Mos was forced to NOT show the evidence....to look like a fool....

Yep... In all fairness to Mos -- it had to be BIG to make him back down, right...REAL BIG!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Observer on December 10, 2007, 08:10:00 PM
Looks as though Sporter has had a loooooong streak of that ole BAD luck!


 :shock:

Klaas,
would that be just his online losses?  Pretty steep for unemployed college freshman.

I think he is up $9400 on the one sight.

He had that one big win at party poker the day before he was arrested. But I dont see it in his winnings.

AANOTILTKK            114   $8     $55     0%   $893     -   Party Poker      x
ANGRYSHARK68            32   -$12     $30     -45%   -$388     Super Tilt   PokerStars      x   x
joran9            160   $0     $24     -15%   -$72     -   iPoker      x
joran_sloot            1   -$22     $20     -100%   -$22     -   Party Poker   

Sites this user plays on
    PartyPoker AANOTILTKK [Verified]
    PokerStars angryshark68 [Verified]
    TitanPoker Joran9 [Verified]
    UltimateBet angryshark68 [Verified]
http://www.pocketfives.com/profiles/joran_sloot

I just added the wins minus the buy ins and it was about $9400 in wins on that sight. His losses on other sights would reduce that amount of course.

Where do they get the data from? At Sharkscope my winnings are exactly correct and his says only 1 game played under joran_sloot at partypoker and he lost.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 10, 2007, 08:11:30 PM
Looks as though Sporter has had a loooooong streak of that ole BAD luck!


 :shock:

Klaas,
would that be just his online losses?  Pretty steep for unemployed college freshman.

I think he is up $9400 on the one sight.

He had that one big win at party poker the day before he was arrested. But I dont see it in his winnings.

AANOTILTKK            114   $8     $55     0%   $893     -   Party Poker      x
ANGRYSHARK68            32   -$12     $30     -45%   -$388     Super Tilt   PokerStars      x   x
joran9            160   $0     $24     -15%   -$72     -   iPoker      x
joran_sloot            1   -$22     $20     -100%   -$22     -   Party Poker   

Sites this user plays on
    PartyPoker AANOTILTKK [Verified]
    PokerStars angryshark68 [Verified]
    TitanPoker Joran9 [Verified]
    UltimateBet angryshark68 [Verified]
http://www.pocketfives.com/profiles/joran_sloot

I just added the wins minus the buy ins and it was about $9400 in wins on that sight. His losses on other sights would reduce that amount of course.

Where do they get the data from? At Sharkscope my winnings are exactly correct and his says only 1 game played under joran_sloot at partypoker and he lost.

if you go to the sight, there is a place you can pull up the history, Klaas posted it above...hang on, I'll bump it down.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 10, 2007, 08:12:17 PM
http://www.pocketfives.com/profiles/joran_sloot

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/SlootPoker1.jpg)

here it is *******


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Observer on December 10, 2007, 08:14:25 PM

in blackjack, you aren't allowed to touch the cards, you can do what you want with your chips, so whatever he was doing under the table may have been immoral, but it wasn't illegal..lol. Poker you can't take your hands off of the table, blackjack you can.

No thats not true. When I first started playing BJ in Vegas I was warned to keep both hands on top of the table. I didn't know any better as I was only 21  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: robots on December 10, 2007, 08:15:43 PM
angry shark

he sure like to use the word sharks in his everyday life

Natalee wanted to see sharks..........BULLCRAP


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 10, 2007, 08:17:07 PM

in blackjack, you aren't allowed to touch the cards, you can do what you want with your chips, so whatever he was doing under the table may have been immoral, but it wasn't illegal..lol. Poker you can't take your hands off of the table, blackjack you can.

No thats not true. When I first started playing BJ in Vegas I was warned to keep both hands on top of the table. I didn't know any better as I was only 21  :wink:

occasionally I play here in St Louis. When I get nervous I twiddle my thumbs..lol...I drop my winnings in my purse..take them out etc. Once the bet is made, you can't touch cards or chips so he wasn't cheating.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: robots on December 10, 2007, 08:19:45 PM
based on joran and his character.. that we know about so far

the fact that he was playing cards and he is friends with the dealer

my guess is he was running some type of scam  :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 10, 2007, 08:22:08 PM
based on joran and his character.. that we know about so far

the fact that he was playing cards and he is friends with the dealer

my guess is he was running some type of scam  :cool:


casinos are just as evil as joran, maybe more so...he could not pull one over on a casino, he is a dumb drunken kid...it's why he has to steal from his parents.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Observer on December 10, 2007, 08:24:04 PM
http://www.pocketfives.com/profiles/joran_sloot

here it is *******

Hi..Yes I have seen that. At Sharkscope.com it says he only won $893. WHen I searched my own history mine was exact at that site. It doesnt really matter as I was just trying to see what was accurate. I don't doubt he gambles a lot at hold-em.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: robots on December 10, 2007, 08:24:20 PM
i have a "friend" and we play... ummm errr i mean "he" plays poker once a month
at an un-named location and its a $100 buy in. usually 30 people and 3 tables going.
winners play in the final table and the losers play cash games if they want.

and everyone likes everyone but its serious business, and if someone is suspected of cheating... i would not want to be that person

if you know what i mean :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: robots on December 10, 2007, 08:25:57 PM
based on joran and his character.. that we know about so far

the fact that he was playing cards and he is friends with the dealer

my guess is he was running some type of scam  :cool:


casinos are just as evil as joran, maybe more so...he could not pull one over on a casino, he is a dumb drunken kid...it's why he has to steal from his parents.


i agree,, except it happens when the dealers are croooked

at least that is what i saw on TV on the cheating channel about vegas  :lol: :lol: :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 10, 2007, 08:26:31 PM
http://www.pocketfives.com/profiles/joran_sloot

here it is *******

Hi..Yes I have seen that. At Sharkscope.com it says he only won $893. WHen I searched my own history mine was exact at that site. It doesnt really matter as I was just trying to see what was accurate. I don't doubt he gambles a lot at hold-em.

you play there too? Get in a game with him and kick his azz...lol


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 10, 2007, 08:29:44 PM
based on joran and his character.. that we know about so far

the fact that he was playing cards and he is friends with the dealer

my guess is he was running some type of scam  :cool:


casinos are just as evil as joran, maybe more so...he could not pull one over on a casino, he is a dumb drunken kid...it's why he has to steal from his parents.


i agree,, except it happens when the dealers are croooked

at least that is what i saw on TV on the cheating channel about vegas  :lol: :lol: :lol:

I saw that show on those kids from MIT I think it was. They were genius level!! Took them a year of studying how to count cards. They won millions before they were caught. I kind of thought they were cool!! lol Joran is no genius thats for sure...probably can't even tie his own shoes!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Buckeye on December 10, 2007, 08:30:09 PM
Interesting that "forensic" Archer says he drove the route...to the lighthouse, blah, blah, blah.

Doesn't Joran, in his book, deny going to the lighthouse??

hmmmmmm....the rocks.....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 10, 2007, 08:30:32 PM
Private Eye - if you read this.  Natalee's Freebirds heard you were looking for the information on the Judges.  I already gave you the link to some of their stuff but they "bumped" it up on their website as well.  Natalee's Freebirds do excellent well researched posts, you can get alot of information from their site (in one place).  We actually have all their stuff posted at SM as well:

All of Natalee's Freebirds posts copied to SM:http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=599.0


Their blog
http://nataleesfreebirds.blogspot.com/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Buckeye on December 10, 2007, 08:32:04 PM
Sleuth

Actually had a very early, accurate Judge chart.  I remember because I quoted it once without giving credit.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Observer on December 10, 2007, 08:32:30 PM
i have a "friend" and we play... ummm errr i mean "he" plays poker once a month
at an un-named location and its a $100 buy in. usually 30 people and 3 tables going.
winners play in the final table and the losers play cash games if they want.

and everyone likes everyone but its serious business, and if someone is suspected of cheating... i would not want to be that person

if you know what i mean :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:

If you look it up Posner was he was big in online poker as many of these sites are located in places like costa rica,south africa..carribean etc. I never researched him much so I dont know the specifics. I know just recently absolute poker was caught big time cheating but they still never got shut down. It's a evil business for sure..Especially online.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=FczbS7FiWSM



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 10, 2007, 08:37:07 PM
i have a "friend" and we play... ummm errr i mean "he" plays poker once a month
at an un-named location and its a $100 buy in. usually 30 people and 3 tables going.
winners play in the final table and the losers play cash games if they want.

and everyone likes everyone but its serious business, and if someone is suspected of cheating... i would not want to be that person

if you know what i mean :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:

If you look it up Posner was he was big in online poker as many of these sites are located in places like costa rica,south africa..carribean etc. I never researched him much so I dont know the specifics. I know just recently absolute poker was caught big time cheating but they still never got shut down. It's a evil business for sure..Especially online.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=FczbS7FiWSM



pure evil. I stopped going. When people come to visit they like to stop by, I let my brother take them now. One time I saw a 2 year old pop up in a van. It was maybe 11 at night and I was leaving. I went back in and told security, they said nothing we can do. Called the cops, they said nothing we can do it's private property. I was so disgusted I never went again. Someone was in gambling while their two year old was locked in a van. The baby must have been sleeping and then woke up. No one would do a thing!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Observer on December 10, 2007, 08:38:41 PM

you play there too? Get in a game with him and kick his azz...lol

I play at a site he use to play at but not party poker. If I see him at my site I will actually be able to go to his table and talk to him. But I am pretty sure he moved on and plays just at party poker. Looking at his history he has played at a bunch of sites and he joins another one after he loses a few games.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 10, 2007, 08:40:54 PM
http://scaredmonkeys.com/2006/02/27/joran-van-der-sloots-many-stories-koens-fathers-boat-one-of-the-many/

That house where that boat is parked, looks totally different from the house we were told by Renfro was the Koan house wx was for sale.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 10, 2007, 08:41:26 PM
many times the "WINS" at the poker sites are not real cold hard cash..
its just a way to buy into a tournament with phoney money on a future date

in other words,,, joran could not get 9000.00 in cash from one of those sites

Nawwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww.. he sucks at poker

even a blind squirrel finds a few nuts once in awhile  :cool:

 :lol:


 :shock:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on December 10, 2007, 08:41:55 PM

This just makes what I have been thinking more and more plausible.....I think Mos DOES have the evidence he said he did...and I think someone got to him...who I don't know..I think he was ordered, threatened, whatever to back down. To lose whatever he had.  When Vinda was interviewed she was SURE he had the goods...she stated that it had to be NEW and incriminating evidence for a judge in the NL to order the pervert held and transported to hell island.....she also said it was more difficult, as the standards were higher in the NL, to hold someone on suspicion.....I have gone over and over all this and I really think this is what happened...I think Mos was forced to NOT show the evidence....to look like a fool....

Yep... In all fairness to Mos -- it had to be BIG to make him back down, right...REAL BIG!


When the going gets tough, the Dutch get the hell out of Dodge. Mos sure changed his stripes in two short weeks.

Watch for this. They'll close the case but they'll make sure that case files never see the light of day to cover up their cowardess. They will come up with more twisted horseshit about Dutch law to make sure it doesn't happen. They're a bunch of chickenshits.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: BUCKSHOT on December 10, 2007, 08:46:34 PM
tj ward / jossy mansur / beth and dave. these three sitting around a round table could solve this case, i am sure, down to the minute.

simple theory... jk2 + nh leave cnc headed for a drive... drive takes them by the lighthouse at the northern end of the island...something bad happens here at the rocks...drive by sloot house, in panic...paulus gets involved...others, through paulus and j2k get involved...multiple vehicles + multiple persons involved (not 10 - maybe 3-5) in early hours...setting up alibis begin...evidence cleaning begins(cars,shoes,apartment)...temporary body disposal site...next day...setting up alibis continue...evidence cleaning continues...final disposal plan is arranged...final disposal plan is executed...paulus judiciary connections are contacted and utilized throughout.

this just seems, after much thought, to make sense to me.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Observer on December 10, 2007, 08:47:19 PM

pure evil. I stopped going. When people come to visit they like to stop by, I let my brother take them now. One time I saw a 2 year old pop up in a van. It was maybe 11 at night and I was leaving. I went back in and told security, they said nothing we can do. Called the cops, they said nothing we can do it's private property. I was so disgusted I never went again. Someone was in gambling while their two year old was locked in a van. The baby must have been sleeping and then woke up. No one would do a thing!!

Yeh thats awful but that happens everyday in vegas and even worse. I just play for fun and for the sport but's it can be a serious addiction just like drugs. There is a dark side to every casino.

Joran has alot of time on his hands and probably has been gambling since he was 16. I can only imagine the type of player he is and I am sure he loves his online poker. If he isn't in prison I am sure he will be playing a ton more in 2008.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 10, 2007, 08:47:36 PM

you play there too? Get in a game with him and kick his azz...lol

I play at a site he use to play at but not party poker. If I see him at my site I will actually be able to go to his table and talk to him. But I am pretty sure he moved on and plays just at party poker. Looking at his history he has played at a bunch of sites and he joins another one after he loses a few games.

I would worry if my kid was playing poker like that...he definately has some addictions, what a messed up person he is...all around just totally screwed up person!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 10, 2007, 08:48:52 PM


This just makes what I have been thinking more and more plausible.....I think Mos DOES have the evidence he said he did...and I think someone got to him...who I don't know..I think he was ordered, threatened, whatever to back down. To lose whatever he had.  When Vinda was interviewed she was SURE he had the goods...she stated that it had to be NEW and incriminating evidence for a judge in the NL to order the pervert held and transported to hell island.....she also said it was more difficult, as the standards were higher in the NL, to hold someone on suspicion.....I have gone over and over all this and I really think this is what happened...I think Mos was forced to NOT show the evidence....to look like a fool....

Yep... In all fairness to Mos -- it had to be BIG to make him back down, right...REAL BIG!

I have gone back the past couple of days and looked at and listened to everything I could find...all the interviews etc...time after time...listened to every word he said, read every article I could find...I am convinced he has new and explosive evidence.... WHO or WHAT made him do a turn around....the statement that the family and the media were the ones who hindered the case....that was so atypical of anything we had heard him say.....either he has the evidence or he needs to move to Hollywood!! :shock:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 10, 2007, 08:49:27 PM

pure evil. I stopped going. When people come to visit they like to stop by, I let my brother take them now. One time I saw a 2 year old pop up in a van. It was maybe 11 at night and I was leaving. I went back in and told security, they said nothing we can do. Called the cops, they said nothing we can do it's private property. I was so disgusted I never went again. Someone was in gambling while their two year old was locked in a van. The baby must have been sleeping and then woke up. No one would do a thing!!

Yeh thats awful but that happens everyday in vegas and even worse. I just play for fun and for the sport but's it can be a serious addiction just like drugs. There is a dark side to every casino.

Joran has alot of time on his hands and probably has been gambling since he was 16. I can only imagine the type of player he is and I am sure he loves his online poker. If he isn't in prison I am sure he will be playing a ton more in 2008.

you know O, he is headed for prison, may not be for what he did to Natalee, but no doubt in my mind he will end up there. No doubt in my mind he is still stealing to cover his habits too.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 10, 2007, 08:49:42 PM
http://scaredmonkeys.com/2006/02/27/joran-van-der-sloots-many-stories-koens-fathers-boat-one-of-the-many/

That house where that boat is parked, looks totally different from the house we were told by Renfro was the Koan house wx was for sale.


Here are more views.....
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=329.480


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 10, 2007, 08:49:58 PM
I think this case was solved two years ago.  It's getting the proof when you have LE destroying it faster than it can be found that is the problem.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 10, 2007, 08:51:05 PM


This just makes what I have been thinking more and more plausible.....I think Mos DOES have the evidence he said he did...and I think someone got to him...who I don't know..I think he was ordered, threatened, whatever to back down. To lose whatever he had.  When Vinda was interviewed she was SURE he had the goods...she stated that it had to be NEW and incriminating evidence for a judge in the NL to order the pervert held and transported to hell island.....she also said it was more difficult, as the standards were higher in the NL, to hold someone on suspicion.....I have gone over and over all this and I really think this is what happened...I think Mos was forced to NOT show the evidence....to look like a fool....

Yep... In all fairness to Mos -- it had to be BIG to make him back down, right...REAL BIG!

I have gone back the past couple of days and looked at and listened to everything I could find...all the interviews etc...time after time...listened to every word he said, read every article I could find...I am convinced he has new and explosive evidence.... WHO or WHAT made him do a turn around....the statement that the family and the media were the ones who hindered the case....that was so atypical of anything we had heard him say.....either he has the evidence or he needs to move to Hollywood!! :shock:

Sunny, he even had JQK and Jossy convinced. I think Jossy knows what it is too. I just hope he reveals all he knows now that Mos is not prosecuting.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: BUCKSHOT on December 10, 2007, 08:53:10 PM

This just makes what I have been thinking more and more plausible.....I think Mos DOES have the evidence he said he did...and I think someone got to him...who I don't know..I think he was ordered, threatened, whatever to back down. To lose whatever he had.  When Vinda was interviewed she was SURE he had the goods...she stated that it had to be NEW and incriminating evidence for a judge in the NL to order the pervert held and transported to hell island.....she also said it was more difficult, as the standards were higher in the NL, to hold someone on suspicion.....I have gone over and over all this and I really think this is what happened...I think Mos was forced to NOT show the evidence....to look like a fool....

Yep... In all fairness to Mos -- it had to be BIG to make him back down, right...REAL BIG!


When the going gets tough, the Dutch get the hell out of Dodge. Mos sure changed his stripes in two short weeks.

Watch for this. They'll close the case but they'll make sure that case files never see the light of day to cover up their cowardess. They will come up with more twisted horseshit about Dutch law to make sure it doesn't happen.[/
[/b]color] They're a bunch of chickenshits.[/b]

i 100% agree with this. the important evidence will not see daylight. only the "made for public" declassified stuff will see daylight.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 10, 2007, 08:54:07 PM
Since I know nothing about cards or poker :2brickwall:...I'll bid y'all good night....later taters


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 10, 2007, 08:54:10 PM


This just makes what I have been thinking more and more plausible.....I think Mos DOES have the evidence he said he did...and I think someone got to him...who I don't know..I think he was ordered, threatened, whatever to back down. To lose whatever he had.  When Vinda was interviewed she was SURE he had the goods...she stated that it had to be NEW and incriminating evidence for a judge in the NL to order the pervert held and transported to hell island.....she also said it was more difficult, as the standards were higher in the NL, to hold someone on suspicion.....I have gone over and over all this and I really think this is what happened...I think Mos was forced to NOT show the evidence....to look like a fool....

Yep... In all fairness to Mos -- it had to be BIG to make him back down, right...REAL BIG!

I have gone back the past couple of days and looked at and listened to everything I could find...all the interviews etc...time after time...listened to every word he said, read every article I could find...I am convinced he has new and explosive evidence.... WHO or WHAT made him do a turn around....the statement that the family and the media were the ones who hindered the case....that was so atypical of anything we had heard him say.....either he has the evidence or he needs to move to Hollywood!! :shock:

Sunny, he even had JQK and Jossy convinced. I think Jossy knows what it is too. I just hope he reveals all he knows now that Mos is not prosecuting.

I didn't know Mos had announced.  He is for SURE not going to prosecute?  That is truly disappointing.

Last thing I was expecting to hear but then not the first time for that either.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 10, 2007, 08:57:57 PM
Old post....interesting to read again RE: Koen
Anonymous said...
He was questioned right away but he has an airtight alibi. He was in south Florida visiting friends the when this happened. It was verified by pictures, talking to friends, his plane ticket and the fact that he was at a birthday party here with 78 witnesses! Dead end, AGAIN!!

Fri Jan 13, 03:08:00 PM EST   
~~~~~~~~~
Anonymous said...
also read today that someone unnamed had their alibi broken recently.

Mon Jan 16, 07:33:00 PM EST
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

BrownSugar said...
I know for a fact that there is a REAL witness (not the gardner, jogger, etc.) who actually SAW the three take off in Koen's boat during those couple hours before Mrs. Twitty arrived at the Van der Sloot home.

This witness can't come forward. He is too afraid for himself and his family. I don't even know if JVDS and Daddy even know about this witness. Remember, there's no such thing as a perfect crime.

However, if this witness talks, this case will break right open.

It all depends on whether or not someone (i.e. Joran, Deepak, Koen, Satish) want to come clean and save their country from utter demise.

Alas, we all know that Joran doesn't care about anyone but himself, so he will move on. He'll go back to Holland and act like royalty and keep repeating his lame saying, "I just want to get on with my life". What a selfish bastard.
Mon Jan 16, 08:55:00 PM EST   
http://arubanboycott.blogspot.com/2006/01/keep-close-eye-on-koen-gottenbos.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Observer on December 10, 2007, 09:00:29 PM

Yep... In all fairness to Mos -- it had to be BIG to make him back down, right...REAL BIG!

When the going gets tough, the Dutch get the hell out of Dodge. Mos sure changed his stripes in two short weeks.

Watch for this. They'll close the case but they'll make sure that case files never see the light of day to cover up their cowardess. They will come up with more twisted horseshit about Dutch law to make sure it doesn't happen. They're a bunch of chickenshits.


Yes,He gave every indication he was on the right track and this was finally over. Then all of a sudden he blamed Natalee's family and the media and he is now saying he is closing the case. He is completely FOS and just a new spokesman for the cover up. We can now include Holland as being involved in covering up crimes against Natalee. I don't think he ran into anything..I think he was a hand picked PR man.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: ldstlou on December 10, 2007, 09:02:02 PM


This just makes what I have been thinking more and more plausible.....I think Mos DOES have the evidence he said he did...and I think someone got to him...who I don't know..I think he was ordered, threatened, whatever to back down. To lose whatever he had.  When Vinda was interviewed she was SURE he had the goods...she stated that it had to be NEW and incriminating evidence for a judge in the NL to order the pervert held and transported to hell island.....she also said it was more difficult, as the standards were higher in the NL, to hold someone on suspicion.....I have gone over and over all this and I really think this is what happened...I think Mos was forced to NOT show the evidence....to look like a fool....

Yep... In all fairness to Mos -- it had to be BIG to make him back down, right...REAL BIG!

I have gone back the past couple of days and looked at and listened to everything I could find...all the interviews etc...time after time...listened to every word he said, read every article I could find...I am convinced he has new and explosive evidence.... WHO or WHAT made him do a turn around....the statement that the family and the media were the ones who hindered the case....that was so atypical of anything we had heard him say.....either he has the evidence or he needs to move to Hollywood!! :shock:

Sunny, he even had JQK and Jossy convinced. I think Jossy knows what it is too. I just hope he reveals all he knows now that Mos is not prosecuting.

I didn't know Mos had announced.  He is for SURE not going to prosecute?  That is truly disappointing.

Last thing I was expecting to hear but then not the first time for that either.

.

sorry Anna, just my assumption, he did not announce it for sure.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 10, 2007, 09:03:10 PM
When this case is closed, anything they do have left will be destroyed.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: NCMike on December 10, 2007, 09:12:00 PM
If you scroll down on one of the poker sites that shows Jorans profile there is  a note about friends that he plays with, the one showing is anette_15.  Might be interesting, if someone who knows how better than, I tried to track down that profile.  Just a thought!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on December 10, 2007, 09:13:07 PM
When this case is closed, anything they do have left will be destroyed.


Nut, Buckshot and *******, did Mos ever mention a fubared investigation during his blatherings? I don't think he did. If he had any brains or balls he'd have had Janssen, Van der Straten, and Jacobs asses on the carpet demanding what the hell they were thinking and what they knew they weren't telling. He'd also be demanding who inside ALE has been leaking shit to the anti-family AHATA trolls.

Silence is deafening. Mos doesn't want to crack this case any more than did his predessors.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 10, 2007, 09:15:27 PM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub2/1LOCK.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 10, 2007, 09:18:19 PM
Anna, what I heard this afternoon was that he had promised the accused (3 PIMPS) that unless some significant information was forthcoming before 31 December, he would close the case because 2+ years was enough, too much to put them through.  Heard it this afternoon either on public radio or TV, not sure which, been putting up decor and listening to both, sort of.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 10, 2007, 09:22:18 PM
If you scroll down on one of the poker sites that shows Jorans profile there is  a note about friends that he plays with, the one showing is anette_15.  Might be interesting, if someone who knows how better than, I tried to track down that profile.  Just a thought!

One "N" or two?

http://www.pokerverdict.com/Focus/683/player_focus_annette_15.html

Player Focus: Annette_15
Annette_15 has caused more of a stir in online poker circles recently than any other player. Find out why...
31 October 2006 By James Hipwell

"She claims never to have made a single deposit and has built up her bankroll to several hundred thousand dollars from scratch"Annette Obrestad aka Annette_15 is one of the most talked-about online players in Europe right now.

Not only is she still a teenager, having started playing poker, as her online name suggests, at the age of 15, but she has racked up winnings of close to $300,000 in the last two months alone.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 10, 2007, 09:24:44 PM
If you scroll down on one of the poker sites that shows Jorans profile there is  a note about friends that he plays with, the one showing is anette_15.  Might be interesting, if someone who knows how better than, I tried to track down that profile.  Just a thought!

One "N" or two?

http://www.pokerverdict.com/Focus/683/player_focus_annette_15.html

Player Focus: Annette_15
Annette_15 has caused more of a stir in online poker circles recently than any other player. Find out why...
31 October 2006 By James Hipwell

"She claims never to have made a single deposit and has built up her bankroll to several hundred thousand dollars from scratch"Annette Obrestad aka Annette_15 is one of the most talked-about online players in Europe right now.

Not only is she still a teenager, having started playing poker, as her online name suggests, at the age of 15, but she has racked up winnings of close to $300,000 in the last two months alone.



Not sure if Joran actually plays poker with her.  He may just have her on his list of favorite players.  Here is her website:

http://betting.betfair.com/annette_15/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: NCMike on December 10, 2007, 09:29:25 PM
I believe thats it Klass, annette_15, 2 "n"!  Hell, if she's that popular in Europe she's probably on everyones friends list.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Observer on December 10, 2007, 09:29:28 PM
When this case is closed, anything they do have left will be destroyed.


Nut, Buckshot and *******, did Mos ever mention a fubared investigation during his blatherings? I don't think he did. If he had any brains or balls he'd have had Janssen, Van der Straten, and Jacobs asses on the carpet demanding what the hell they were thinking and what they knew they weren't telling. He'd also be demanding who inside ALE has been leaking shit to the anti-family AHATA trolls.

Silence is deafening. Mos doesn't want to crack this case any more than did his predessors.


No he never mentioned that and no one has ever from Aruba except Jossy. It's the obvious answer how to solve this case and to bust this cover up is to start with Van Der Straaten and Jacobs. The people that could be hurt if PVDS told more. Paul Van Der Sloots Best Friend was in charge of everything for almost two months and everyone knows it!!!! I am sure that was what Beth and Dave wanted to talk about..But Mos had no answers to any of there qustions but only to blame the victims family and media. Thats how I know Mos is crooked and this investigation has all been one big cover up. Its almost like they are giving the family till dec 31st to prove its a cover up or they are closing the case forever. Don't believe this 15 year crap if they find more evidence. It's now or never.

The only time Mos ever mentioned cover up is in this video and it has never set well with me.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=XWwFu7hBcEM


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Observer on December 10, 2007, 09:33:34 PM
I believe thats it Klass, annette_15, 2 "n"!  Hell, if she's that popular in Europe she's probably on everyones friends list.

Absolutely she is very popular! I bet Joran plays with Koen and some of his Aruban buddies. He wont list them as friends because thats considered cheating if joran and a friend are at the same table and sharing there cards on msn.I  know Andre Santo's is big into poker also. I bet they all are.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on December 10, 2007, 09:45:56 PM
Nut, Buckshot and *******, did Mos ever mention a fubared investigation during his blatherings? I don't think he did. If he had any brains or balls he'd have had Janssen, Van der Straten, and Jacobs asses on the carpet demanding what the hell they were thinking and what they knew they weren't telling. He'd also be demanding who inside ALE has been leaking shit to the anti-family AHATA trolls.

Silence is deafening. Mos doesn't want to crack this case any more than did his predessors.


No he never mentioned that and no one has ever from Aruba except Jossy. It's the obvious answer how to solve this case and to bust this cover up is to start with Van Der Straaten and Jacobs. The people that could be hurt if PVDS told more. Paul Van Der Sloots Best Friend was in charge of everything for almost two months and everyone knows it!!!! I am sure that was what Beth and Dave wanted to talk about..But Mos had no answers to any of there qustions but only to blame the victims family and media. Thats how I know Mos is crooked and this investigation has all been one big cover up. Its almost like they are giving the family till dec 31st to prove its a cover up or they are closing the case forever. Don't believe this 15 year crap if they find more evidence. It's now or never.

The only time Mos ever mentioned cover up is in this video and it has never set well with me.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=XWwFu7hBcEM


Exactly, crack the cover-up and you'll crack the case. Those people will squeal, but Mos will never get that close to the case, which makes him just a guilty of the cover-up as the rest of them. No way they can police themselves, not in Aruba or Holland.

BTW, for a few chuckles read this forum.
http://www.expatica.com/source/forum_thread.asp?channel_id=1&thread_id=50082


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: robots on December 10, 2007, 09:55:56 PM
MOS SUCKS

i can switch sides faster than you can shake a stick

when im presented with more information - i make new decisions


MOS SUCKS


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: robots on December 10, 2007, 09:58:35 PM
MOS came out blazing then TURNED the corner to hell

he is either the following and possibly all of them

1. LIAR

2. afraid to do any more because he was threatened

3. complete MORON

4. in love with joran just like GRETA is  :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: wreck on December 10, 2007, 10:02:17 PM
MOS came out blazing then TURNED the corner to hell

he is either the following and possibly all of them

1. LIAR

2. afraid to do any more because he was threatened

3. complete MORON

4. in love with joran just like GRETA is  :cool:
It IS all of them


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: robots on December 10, 2007, 10:02:29 PM
MOS is an ALIEN

im leaning towards he was "TOLD" to shut up which in my opinion makes him as bad as the others

when good people see evil and do not stop it, they are as guilty as doing it themselves



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: robots on December 10, 2007, 10:04:22 PM
MOS came out blazing then TURNED the corner to hell

he is either the following and possibly all of them

1. LIAR

2. afraid to do any more because he was threatened

3. complete MORON

4. in love with joran just like GRETA is  :cool:
It IS all of them

yep


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: mrs. red on December 10, 2007, 10:07:32 PM
MOS is an ALIEN

im leaning towards he was "TOLD" to shut up which in my opinion makes him as bad as the others

when good people see evil and do not stop it, they are as guilty as doing it themselves



which is why, IMO, there are no "innocent arubans"


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 10, 2007, 10:08:41 PM
I was surprised at Mos saying the family did not want him to bring lesser charges like for disposal of a corpse with less than six months jail time.

He is saying this in AP report.  I would like to hear it from the family but doesn't seem any of them are talking right now.

I posted one article with his saying that earlier today.  So at least we know why none of the small charges are being brought.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: wreck on December 10, 2007, 10:09:59 PM
MOS is an ALIEN

im leaning towards he was "TOLD" to shut up which in my opinion makes him as bad as the others

when good people see evil and do not stop it, they are as guilty as doing it themselves



which is why, IMO, there are no "innocent arubans"
They can all fiddle while Aruba burns.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: San on December 10, 2007, 10:15:05 PM
MOS is an ALIEN

im leaning towards he was "TOLD" to shut up which in my opinion makes him as bad as the others

when good people see evil and do not stop it, they are as guilty as doing it themselves

He was never told to shut up.  This was all a plan from the day Rudy Croes asked the Dutch for help.  Rudy Croes has been the mastermind behind all of this.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Magnolia on December 10, 2007, 10:19:39 PM
MOS is an ALIEN

im leaning towards he was "TOLD" to shut up which in my opinion makes him as bad as the others

when good people see evil and do not stop it, they are as guilty as doing it themselves



which is why, IMO, there are no "innocent arubans"
They can all fiddle while Aruba burns.


The Monkeys have known all of the facts since July 2005.
The Freebirds have posted detailed information.
Nobody pays attention.
What can we do with all of this information?

The only hope that I can see is Jossy printing it all in his
newspaper for all of Aruba to read.
I think most Arubans choose to ignore it all, but if it is
seen in print for several days running, maybe they will wake up.

Mos was a hope, but that hope has been shattered.
What else can we do?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: robots on December 10, 2007, 10:30:07 PM
MOS is an ALIEN

im leaning towards he was "TOLD" to shut up which in my opinion makes him as bad as the others

when good people see evil and do not stop it, they are as guilty as doing it themselves


:wink:
which is why, IMO, there are no "innocent arubans"


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on December 10, 2007, 10:31:05 PM

The Monkeys have known all of the facts since July 2005.
The Freebirds have posted detailed information.
Nobody pays attention.
What can we do with all of this information?

The only hope that I can see is Jossy printing it all in his
newspaper for all of Aruba to read.
I think most Arubans choose to ignore it all, but if it is
seen in print for several days running, maybe they will wake up.

Mos was a hope, but that hope has been shattered.
What else can we do?


What happened to the Dompig interview by Jossy that was supposed to reveal new information on the case? A teaser ran on Fox and it went poof.

Whay was this tape suppressed and why won't Jossy release it? Who yanked it and why?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: mrs. red on December 10, 2007, 10:31:42 PM
We can make sure that they understand on one skanky island that no justice, no tourism...

they are still thinking that they can sweep this under the carpet and it will all be normal soon... but I say to hell with that...

make sure that everyone you know knows better than to go to Aruba...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on December 10, 2007, 10:34:27 PM
MOS is an ALIEN

im leaning towards he was "TOLD" to shut up which in my opinion makes him as bad as the others

when good people see evil and do not stop it, they are as guilty as doing it themselves

He was never told to shut up.  This was all a plan from the day Rudy Croes asked the Dutch for help.  Rudy Croes has been the mastermind behind all of this.


Mos is Rudy's hat check clerk. Mos is Rudy's Rochester. Mos is no better than the rest who covered it up. Says he has evidence she is deceased then retracts his investigation. POS.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on December 10, 2007, 10:39:35 PM
I was surprised at Mos saying the family did not want him to bring lesser charges like for disposal of a corpse with less than six months jail time.

He is saying this in AP report.  I would like to hear it from the family but doesn't seem any of them are talking right now.

I posted one article with his saying that earlier today.  So at least we know why none of the small charges are being brought.


They scammed the family, they scammed us all. Didn't even do a good job of hiding it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Puzzler on December 10, 2007, 10:39:54 PM
angry shark

he sure like to use the word sharks in his everyday life

Natalee wanted to see sharks..........BULLCRAP

Maybe Joran thought he was being smart...using semantics....maybe he didn't really mean the kind of sharks that live in the ocean...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: robots on December 10, 2007, 10:41:40 PM
yep
SHARKS was the only thing his crazy mind could come up with as to the reason to get her to the water


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on December 10, 2007, 10:43:00 PM
We can make sure that they understand on one skanky island that no justice, no tourism...

they are still thinking that they can sweep this under the carpet and it will all be normal soon... but I say to hell with that...

make sure that everyone you know knows better than to go to Aruba...


If anything the Dutch and Arubans have proven once again to the world that there is no justice on that damn rock. And they said they didn't want to hurt tourism but the case had to be prosecuted? What a farce. They shot themselves in the foot. Who writes their talking points?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 10, 2007, 10:43:39 PM
Hi Monkeys...I have a question..well, maybe a few.

Who is Maria Figaroa?  Refresh me on this one, please. TIA


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 10, 2007, 10:51:00 PM
Hi Monkeys...I have a question..well, maybe a few.

Who is Maria Figaroa?  Refresh me on this one, please. TIA


Name: Maria Figaroa
Date: 22 June 2005 / 18:05
Pages: 2
Writer/Initiator: Giovanni Heyliger
Description: witness statement by a Carlos & Charlies employee


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Puzzler on December 10, 2007, 10:56:56 PM
I'm wondering if Mos hasn't been completely and totally overwhelmed with the corruption he's encountered in Aruba!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: San on December 10, 2007, 11:05:15 PM
Goodnight Everyone

When I wake up tomorrow morning I hope someone eliminates Paulus and Joran from the streets and puts them in jail.

 :smt097



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 10, 2007, 11:08:06 PM
Nite San  :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 10, 2007, 11:08:21 PM
Hi Monkeys...I have a question..well, maybe a few.

Who is Maria Figaroa?  Refresh me on this one, please. TIA


Name: Maria Figaroa
Date: 22 June 2005 / 18:05
Pages: 2
Writer/Initiator: Giovanni Heyliger
Description: witness statement by a Carlos & Charlies employee

Wasn't she a witness for Steve Croes too?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 10, 2007, 11:11:10 PM
Hi Monkeys...I have a question..well, maybe a few.

Who is Maria Figaroa?  Refresh me on this one, please. TIA


Name: Maria Figaroa
Date: 22 June 2005 / 18:05
Pages: 2
Writer/Initiator: Giovanni Heyliger
Description: witness statement by a Carlos & Charlies employee

Wasn't she a witness for Steve Croes too?

I don't recall


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 10, 2007, 11:13:28 PM
I'm wondering if Mos hasn't been completely and totally overwhelmed with the corruption he's encountered in Aruba!

I don't think he's been overwhelmed by anything there..he knew what it was like before he got there...I think he planned this all along. JMO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 10, 2007, 11:16:04 PM
When I say he planned this...I mean it was in the works for him to do this for some time...no trial...no one learns about the corruption or the cover up...no information...no one knows the truth...everyone goes home happy and AHATA goes back to work trying to save Crappy Island. JMO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Magnolia on December 10, 2007, 11:32:34 PM
When I say he planned this...I mean it was in the works for him to do this for some time...no trial...no one learns about the corruption or the cover up...no information...no one knows the truth...everyone goes home happy and AHATA goes back to work trying to save Crappy Island. JMO

I think you are so right, Lala.  But I think it has backfired to some
degree in that it has brought the case to the forefront once again.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 10, 2007, 11:37:59 PM

The Monkeys have known all of the facts since July 2005.
The Freebirds have posted detailed information.
Nobody pays attention.
What can we do with all of this information?

The only hope that I can see is Jossy printing it all in his
newspaper for all of Aruba to read.
I think most Arubans choose to ignore it all, but if it is
seen in print for several days running, maybe they will wake up.

Mos was a hope, but that hope has been shattered.
What else can we do?


What happened to the Dompig interview by Jossy that was supposed to reveal new information on the case? A teaser ran on Fox and it went poof.

Whay was this tape suppressed and why won't Jossy release it? Who yanked it and why?



Dompig/Jossy Video

Kimberly Guilfoyle
THE LINEUP
December 11, 2006


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ymSWgZm6ivo


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Yellow Ribbon on December 10, 2007, 11:49:01 PM
The only hope is to find Natalee's body.  :sad:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: msmarple on December 10, 2007, 11:57:41 PM
I'm pretty sure this has been posted, but anyway ... I've been out of pocket for a few days.

http://www.amigoe.com/english/ (http://www.amigoe.com/english/)   12/08/2007

Quote
They would finish me off in the US

Joran, by now nicely shaved, on his way to the supermarket, while enjoying his freedom. {current photo accompanied this article}

ORANJESTAD – Both lawyers had assured that after days of isolation, Joran van der Sloot would not want to say one word to the media.  Especially his parents are concerned.  On Friday afternoon, a few hours after his release, while walking back home from a supermarket in Noord with his younger brother, he was still willing to give a first reaction.  People in the supermarket have already been whispering: “he’s back”, “What has he endured”, and “It’s such a nice family”.  He doesn’t seem to be worried to walk over the street.  “I think that I would not have made it in the United States.”

It’s obvious that the 20-year old young man, who is still on Justice’s list of suspects, has not got over the adventure of the past days yet.  He has been detained for 15 days, and most of the time in isolation.  “I was in a cell that could hold 15 men, but I was alone.  I was allowed kick a ball so now and then and they indeed gave me the Bible.  I would have preferred contact with others.”

The interrogations were heavy.  “It’s not that they bothered me all the time, but every time I was interrogated, it was long.  I didn’t have anything to tell them.  I have already told them everything once and I was silent till the last minute.”

The arrest in his dorm in Arnhem was a complete surprise.  He planned to move to Amsterdam, due to the location of his school.  He hadn’t planned to go to Aruba for Christmas. “I really thought that it was over; that one day I would perhaps have to go to Aruba for the closing of the case.  But I have never thought that I would be arrested again in the Netherlands.  It turns out that they have nothing new here.  I still do not understand what they wanted.”

Van der Sloot hates the fact that he had to miss part of his studies.  He wants to go back soon.  He’s not sure how long he’s going to stay on the island.  “I’ll spend some time with my parents.  Despite everything, Aruba is a special place.  I’m going to take a plunge in the swimming pool right now.”

He will not get in contact with the brothers Deepak and Satish Kalpoe that were released a few days earlier.  The friendship seems to have cooled off ‘for years’ already.  Yet another effect of the case, agrees Van der Sloot.

According to rumours in the media, Van der Sloot has taken a plane to the United States yesterday evening.  The journalists concluded this from his presence at the airport.  Nothing is further from the truth.  He was there to see his American lawyer off.  He will stay for the time being in Aruba.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Magnolia on December 11, 2007, 12:09:34 AM
It is hard for me to believe that Natalee's family did not want
the perps prosceuted on lesser charges, as Mos said.
In Josie's video Dampig says that there are statements to
charge them for sexual assualt.
Man, I would take that in a heartbeat.
Shoot, I would take the six month thing for hiding a body.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 11, 2007, 12:13:15 AM
It is hard for me to believe that Natalee's family did not want
the perps prosceuted on lesser charges, as Mos said.
In Josie's video Dampig says that there are statements to
charge them for sexual assualt.
Man, I would take that in a heartbeat.
Shoot, I would take the six month thing for hiding a body.



Me, too, Magnolia, I am hoping for some clarification on this point. I would be very happy with any successful trial because that would bring forth information about other things I would think.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Magnolia on December 11, 2007, 12:18:05 AM
I would rather see them get one lick with the lash than none at all.
New information or not.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 11, 2007, 12:22:47 AM
So Joran considers himself quite the celebrity in Aruba where they say what a nice family he has even with their Prosecutor stating both he and his father had some involvement in Natalee's disappearance.

The standard for "nice" must be very low if that allows for making others disappear.

And of course, he had no idea what they were questioning him about.

Could it have maybe been what he did with Natalee by any chance.

This kid is a total sociopath without one shred of remorse whatsoever.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 11, 2007, 12:25:23 AM
I would rather see them get one lick with the lash than none at all.
New information or not.

A conviction and six months is better to me than no conviction and no months.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 11, 2007, 12:27:51 AM
Good nite, all.  Thanks to all you that keep the faith.  I have been reading but not posting much.  Not much left to say.  I feel that we have been hoodwinked by others far more proficient than the evil Renfro.  It is easy to see what she is up to.   My Cross just goes nuts when she is around and my horseshoe cannot even keep her away, but the others were smoother than we were.  We have been had just like Beth & Dave.  I will continue to pray for our search/ocean explorers as I feel that is the only hope to ever bring Natalee back home.  I know she is in her "deserved place" in Heaven but it would be great to bring back any reasonable remains to her homeland on this side.  Goodnight. All and God speed our brave searchers.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 11, 2007, 12:36:41 AM
Nite Tyler


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Anna on December 11, 2007, 12:43:04 AM
Tyler,

I agree completely, this was professional and at a very high level.  Renfro is a clown compared to those with whom we have been dealing.  Well, time will tell if it was worth it to them and if they got their money's worth.

There was far too much at stake and it had little to do with Sloot-boy.

Goodnight, all.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 11, 2007, 12:51:38 AM
I would rather see them get one lick with the lash than none at all.
New information or not.

A conviction and six months is better to me than no conviction and no months.



It is hard to comprehend that the "Holloway family" agreed to this.  John Q. Kelly's anger and frustration with Hans Mos on the Greta show tells me there was no such agreement.

However ... we will have to wait on confirmation.

In my opinion ... establishing ... for the record ... the involvement of Joran, Deepak and Satish in the disposal of Natalee's remains would be huge in itself and ... a six month sentence implies that for six months other "Natalees" are not at risk.

I feel I am in the Twilight Zone.  Am I understand this correctly?  Hans Mos is implying that under Dutch law it is an offence to dispose of a body but ... considering the penalty is only six months ... that particular offence is not pursued in the Aruban courts.  What is the deterent?  In other words ... Arubans are free to dispose of bodies without consequences?

This is crazy!!!  It was my understanding that justice for the victim was what a justice system is all about ...

Janet

+++++++++++++++++++++

Aruba prosecutor mulling closure of Holloway case
The Associated Press
Published: December 8, 2007


Mos said if prosecutors believed they only had enough evidence to charge someone with a minor crime related to the case, he and the Holloway family feel pursuing such a charge "doesn't serve a purpose." A person convicted of making a body disappear, for example, would serve only six months in prison, he said.

Holloway's relatives did not return calls for comment.

"We have a strong conviction that something happened that night, and that it was a very serious thing," Mos said. "The question is whether we are able to prove it."

http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/12/08/news/CB-GEN-Aruba-Missing-Teen.php


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: msmarple on December 11, 2007, 12:55:14 AM
http://www.diario-aruba.com/2007/12/10/ (http://www.diario-aruba.com/2007/12/10/)

Quote
MAMA DI NATALEE HOLLOWAY, NO SORPRENDI PA LIBERTAD DI JORAN
 
ORANJESTAD(AAN): Mama di e mucha muher Mericano desapareci Natalee Holloway, no a mustra di ta sorprendi Diabierna, cu Joran van der Sloot a wordo laga bek den libertad.

Joran manera ta conoci, ta wordo sospecha di tin algo di haber cu desaparicion di yiu muher di Beth Twitty, pero mescos cu e otro sospechosonan Deepak y Satish Kalpoe, a wordo laga den libertad, pa falta di suficiente evidencia nobo.

“Ta masha simpel, abogado di Twitty a declara.“Si husticia no tin suficiente evidencia pa sigui tene e sospechosonan, nan lo no tin suficiente evidencia pa cuminza un caso”, segun e abogado.

Online Pap translation:

mother of natalee holloway, not sorprendi for freedom of joran

oranjestad(aan): mother of the child muher mericano desapareci natalee holloway, not owing to show of is sorprendi diabierna, cu joran van der sloot owing to wordo let bek in freedom.

joran as is conoci, is wordo sospecha of have algo of haber cu desaparicion of child muher of beth twitty, but same cu the another sospechosonan deepak y satish kalpoe, owing to wordo let in freedom, for miss of sufficient evidencia new.

“ta very simple, advocate of twitty owing to declara.“si husticia not have sufficient evidencia for follow as the sospechosonan, they will not have sufficient evidencia for cuminza one caso”, according the advocate.

* * *

I don't have a clue about this one. Maybe Getagrip can help.

Quote
Autoridad lo tabata sa cu e ta lomba contra muraya
HOLLOWAY MESTER A KITA ATENCION FONDO NOBO SAN NICOLAS
 
Detencionnan Holloway tabata basta dia prepara


ORANJESTAD(AAN)—  Tabata 22 di november. E caso Fondo Desaroyo Nobo cu mester a conoce su finalizacion di investigacion na November, a conoce un sesion di regie. Na DIARIO a worde splica cu tabata djis un ocasion pa pone fecha pa tratamento di cada caso den Corte y eventualmente abogadonan pidi mas testigo.

For di esey a comprende cu no por a papia di un caso cera.  El a bira un caso cu a rementa y a pone autoridad lomba contra muraya.  Mientras medionan di publicacion tabata core pa trece e hechonan na publico, tur atencion a worde dirigi riba e caso cu a pone mundo busca caminda pa autoridad na Aruba.  Autoridad a tira mes atardi caso Holloway den noticia. Informantenan awor ta bisa DIARIO cu hamas esaki por tabata coincidencia. Detencionnan den caso Holloway a tuma hopi dia di preparacion.  Tin indicacion fuerte, cu Holloway mester a kita atencion for di Fondo desaroyo Nobo.

Dia 22 di November algo grave a socede. Un caso cu pa años a worde investiga door di Ministerio Publico, encarga cu persecucion penal, y supuestamente asisti pa tur instancia oficial cu por a usa den e caso aki, pa promer vez mester a habri bentana pa publico haya informacion concreto di e caso.

Origen di e caso tabata e Rapport Berdad di Rudy Lampe traha pa Gobierno Oduber encuanto e Fondo desaroyo Nobo San Nicolas, cu mester a percura pa trece cambionan structural na san Nicolas. E rapport, pa cual Gobierno Oduber a pone 700 Mil Florin un banda en vez di laga nan propio expertonan traha, a worde hiba door di Nelson Oduber y Rudy Lampe pa Ministerio Publico. For di e momento un persecucion politico y penal, cu nunca Aruba a mira ni den casonan di acusacionnan mucho mas pisa, a cuminza.

Pa años pueblo a scucha informacionnan cu Gobierno Oduber kier a usa contra nan contrincantenan politico y si leynan basico di e pais ta exigi pa den un tempo razonabel e veredictonan worde duna door di Huez, e caso aki tin cuatro aña andando.

Cu tabata trata di un persecucion politico tabata visto cu ta riba dos ex Ministro e atencion a worde poni. Informantenan clave a revela na DIARIO cu autoridad mester tabata na haltura cu ora porta habri pa e caso cu a keda tras di cortina, hopi cos por a socede. Esey ta loke a pasa tambe. Na momento cu e sesionnan a cuminza, a aparece e carta den cual Hendrik Croes na forma grosero tabata mustra autoridad, cu ta riba su insistencia tambe e caso penal a cuminza.

Dia 22 di November 2007 tabata un dia decisivo pa e imagen di persecucion legal, cu tabata completamente den defensivo. Fiscal mester a defende su mes cu no tabata tin presion politico. A resulta cu varios documento cu tabata supuestamente perdi a bini dilanti.

Mientras e noticia tabata plama na Aruba, cu a keda asombra pa loke e caso a produci, diripiente merdia Ministerio Publico a lanza e informe cu ta bolbe detene e rumannan Kalpoe y Joran van der Sloot.  Aruba a worde completamente sorprendi, mientras periodistanan Mericano y varios otro pais a dirigi tur atencion atrobe riba e caso Holloway, cu tanto daño a haci imagen di Aruba.

E caso Fondo Desaroyo Nobo, cu manera un vocero di Ministerio Publico mes a admiti enfrente DIARIO “no tin atencion publico:, a perde tereno.For di e momento tabata tin informacionnan cu a alcanza DIARIO cu ta straño con diripiente por a detene van der Sloot y rumannan Kalpoe. Pa por yega na e formulacionnan ta tuma basta tempo. E trabaunan administrativo no por a worde haci den un rato.

Informacionnan cu DIARIO a obtene ta indica, cu e momento cu a lanza e informenan encuanto detencion den e caso Holloway, cu no a produci nada, tabata oportuno pa a kita tur atencion for di realidad di e caso Fondo Desaroyo Nobo, cu a dal un vuelta total.

Tin hopi duda tocante e momento cu a scohe pa lanza e caso Holloway cu mester a haya tur atencion pa despues resulta cu Huez a laga tur e detenidonan den libertad, pasobra no tabata tin e evidencia necesario di parti di autoridad pa por a persigui nan.

DIARIO ta investigando e informenan ya cu en berdad e sucesonan ta cuadra cu loke e informantenan a trece dilanti. Tur informacion cu DIARIO ta ricibi ta mustra cu e Fondo Desaroyo Nobo por tin mucho mas su tras cu por a kere y no manera pa años a permitie worde pinta na publico.

Online Pap translation:

autoridad will was know cu the is back contra wall
holloway have to owing to less atencion fondo
new san nicolas detencionnan holloway was enough day prepara


oranjestad(aan)— was 22 of november. the caso fondo desaroyo new cu have to owing to conoce his finalizacion of investigacion at november, owing to conoce one sesion of regie. at daily paper owing to worde splica cu was immidiately one ocasion for place date for tratamento of cada caso in corte y eventualmente abogadonan ask more witness.

for of esey owing to comprende cu not can owing to talk of one caso close. past owing to become one caso cu owing to rementa y owing to place autoridad back contra wall. while medionan of publicacion was core for trece the hechonan at publico, all atencion owing to worde dirigi on the caso cu owing to place world busca caminda for autoridad at aruba. autoridad owing to throw self nightfall caso holloway in news. informantenan now is tell daily paper cu never this can was coincidencia. detencionnan in caso holloway did take much day of preparacion. have indicacion strong, cu holloway have to owing to less atencion for of fondo desaroyo new.

day 22 of november algo important owing to socede. one caso cu for años owing to worde investiga door of ministerio publico, encarga cu persecucion penal, y supuestamente asisti for all instancia oficial cu can owing to using in the caso here, for previous to vez have to owing to open window for publico achieve informacion concreto of the caso.

origen of the caso was the rapport berdad of rudy lampe work for gobierno oduber encuanto the fondo desaroyo new san nicolas, cu have to owing to percura for trece cambionan structural at san nicolas. the rapport, for cual gobierno oduber owing to place 700 thousand guilder one near provided that vez of let they own expertonan work, owing to worde take away door of nelson oduber y rudy lampe for ministerio publico. for of the instant one persecucion politico y penal, cu never aruba owing to see neither in casonan of acusacionnan mucho more pisa, owing to cuminza.

for años people owing to listen informacionnan cu gobierno oduber wanted owing to using contra they contrincantenan politico y if leynan basico of the country is exigi for in one time razonabel the veredictonan worde give door of huez, the caso here have cuatro year andando.

cu was deal of one persecucion politico was visto cu is on two ex ministro the atencion owing to worde poni. informantenan clave owing to revela at daily paper cu autoridad have to was at height cu hour door open for her caso cu owing to stay behind cortina, much cos can owing to socede. esey is thing owing to happen also. at instant cu the sesionnan owing to cuminza, owing to aparece the carta in cual hendrik croes at form rude was show autoridad, cu is on his insistencia also the caso penal owing to cuminza.

day 22 of november 2007 was one day decisivo for her imagen of persecucion legal, cu was completamente in defensivo. fiscal have to owing to defende his self cu not was have presion politico. owing to resulta cu several documento cu was supuestamente perdi owing to come fast.

while the news was plama at aruba, cu owing to stay asombra for thing the caso owing to produci, diripiente afternoon ministerio publico owing to lanza the informe cu is go back detene the rumannan kalpoe y joran van der sloot. aruba owing to worde completamente sorprendi, while periodistanan mericano y several another country owing to dirigi all atencion again on the caso holloway, cu tanto damage owing to haci imagen of aruba.

the caso fondo desaroyo new, cu as one vocero of ministerio publico self owing to admiti across daily paper “no have atencion publico:, owing to lose territory.for of the instant was have informacionnan cu owing to alcanza daily paper cu is odd con diripiente can owing to detene van der sloot y rumannan kalpoe. for can arrive at the formulacionnan is take enough time. the trabaunan administrativo not can owing to worde haci in one rato.

informacionnan cu daily paper owing to obtene is indica, cu the instant cu owing to lanza the informenan encuanto detencion in the caso holloway, cu not owing to produci nothing, was oportuno for owing to less all atencion for of realidad of the caso fondo desaroyo new, cu owing to strike one vuelta overall.

have much doubt tocante the instant cu owing to scohe for lanza the caso holloway cu have to owing to achieve all atencion for after resulta cu huez owing to let all the detenidonan in freedom, because not was have the evidencia necesario of part of autoridad for can owing to persigui they.

daily paper is investigando the informenan already cu provided that berdad the sucesonan is cuadra cu thing the informantenan owing to trece fast. all informacion cu daily paper is ricibi is show cu the fondo desaroyo new can have mucho more his slow cu can owing to believe y not as for años owing to permitie worde draw at publico.

* * *



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: msmarple on December 11, 2007, 12:57:07 AM
Murder & Crime thread - 44,506 views.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Magnolia on December 11, 2007, 01:00:58 AM
I would rather see them get one lick with the lash than none at all.
New information or not.

A conviction and six months is better to me than no conviction and no months.



It is hard to comprehend that the "Holloway family" agreed to this.  John Q. Kelly's anger and frustration with Hans Mos on the Greta show tells me there was no such agreement.

However ... we will have to wait on confirmation.

In my opinion ... establishing ... for the record ... the involvement of Joran, Deepak and Satish in the disposal of Natalee's remains would be huge in itself and ... a six month sentence implies that for six months other "Natalees" are not at risk.

I feel I am in the Twilight Zone.  Am I understand this correctly?  Hans Mos is implying that under Dutch law it is an offence to dispose of a body but ... considering the penalty is only six months ... that particular offence is not pursued in the Aruban courts.  What is the deterent?  In other words ... Arubans are free to dispose of bodies without consequences?

This is crazy!!!  It was my understanding that justice for the victim was what a justice system is all about ...

Janet

+++++++++++++++++++++

Aruba prosecutor mulling closure of Holloway case
The Associated Press
Published: December 8, 2007


Mos said if prosecutors believed they only had enough evidence to charge someone with a minor crime related to the case, he and the Holloway family feel pursuing such a charge "doesn't serve a purpose." A person convicted of making a body disappear, for example, would serve only six months in prison, he said.

Holloway's relatives did not return calls for comment.

"We have a strong conviction that something happened that night, and that it was a very serious thing," Mos said. "The question is whether we are able to prove it."

http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/12/08/news/CB-GEN-Aruba-Missing-Teen.php

We just saw the Jossy video where Dompig says that they have the statements from the suspects "admitting sexual assualt" and there is
a provision in their law that gives an eight year sentence for that crime.
If they have the suspects confessions to that.....why can't they prosecute?
What am I missing?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: IBE on December 11, 2007, 01:01:27 AM
Here's on thing that really chaps me....Joran's defense team is always bringing up Joran's statement that Natalee wanted to see the sharks as evidence that they took her to the beach.

Aside from the fact that every word out of his mouth is a lie......

I take the comment about taking her to see the sharks as his little smug joke with himself.  His online poker nic is shark68 or something.  If any truth from him, he took Natalee to someplace there was a poker game or gambling, like a private game where others were waiting for them to arrive.

The beach story is trumped up so much it's one of the biggest diversions.  IMO, they were never on the beach.  All about the "sharks".

Can you believe that 2 1/2 years later, Joe's crack forensic scientist drove around and didn't see any evidence?  And Star is supposed to be a lawyer.  Was she even listening?



Very very early in all this it was rumored there was a poker going on in the van der Sloots home with the "elders" (I take this to mean the Police Chief, govt officials) there with Paulus. Then all of a sudden, poof nothing more said.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: IBE on December 11, 2007, 01:04:23 AM
Meant "poker game"

What ever happened about the brother of Joran posting the bathtub ditty on the Internet? (too graphic for me to repeat)

Monkeys, keep up the Good Works!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 11, 2007, 01:10:44 AM
Good Night Monkeys.

Janet

10:10 PM


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 11, 2007, 01:14:35 AM
Good Night Monkeys.

Janet

10:10 PM

Nite Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: klaasend on December 11, 2007, 01:16:56 AM
http://www.amigoe.com/artman/publish/artikel_37702.php

Chaos op luchthaven
10 Dec, 2007, 18:22 (GMT -04:00)
   
  ORANJESTAD — Bij de vertrekhal voor Amerikaanse bestemmingen leidde de enorme toeloop van passagiers op de luchthaven afgelopen zaterdag tot chaotische toestanden. De reizigers stonden noodgedwongen in lange rijen buiten de terminal. Oorzaak van de problemen zou te wijten zijn aan een tekort van immigratiepersoneel. Naar verluidt is een aantal van hen zelf op vakantie en mogen er geen overuren worden gedeclareerd. Het personeel van luchtvaartmaatschappijen en afhandelingsmaatschappijen deed zijn uiterste best om de passagiers tijdig bij de vliegtuigen te krijgen. Vanuit die hoek wordt bezorgd gekeken naar de komende weekeinden, met name voor de kerst en nieuwjaar. Die behoren traditioneel tot de drukste periodes van het jaar op de luchthaven.

Through translator:

Chaos on airport

 10 Dec, 2007, 18.22 (GMT -04:00) E-mail this Article prints this Article

ORANJESTAD - at the departure hall for American destinations enormous multitude of passengers on the airport last Saturday led to chaotic situations. The travellers stood range by force of circumstance in long outside the terminal. Cause of the problems would blame be to a shortage of immigration staff. According to reports a number of them itself is there on holiday and can no overuren be declared. The staff of airline companies and settlement societies did its extrême best get the passengers swiftly at the planes. From that angle it is provided looked at to coming week ends, particularly for the kerst and new year. Those belong traditionally up to the busiest periods of the year on the airport.
 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Helen Back on December 11, 2007, 01:26:39 AM
Cable modem was flaky tonight.  Sorry I missed everyone.  Goodnight anymonkey who's still up.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: IBE on December 11, 2007, 03:36:47 AM
I had the occasion to speak with Paul, Beth's brother this morning and he said he was going to be on Court TV today for those interested. He also brought up a topic and requested information that someone, possibly Frank or *******, were discussing earlier. He wants to nail down exactly who the specific Judges have been on this case and the specific act that they accomplished. I mentioned to him a post one time that I THINK mentioned that the Judge who executed and edited the Van Der Sloots search warrant and was on premises while the search was executed, was also a frequent overnight guest of the Van Der Sloots while he was there with his job and at other times. Anyone who has information concerning this he would really appreciate it if you would post so that he can review. His interview with Court TV is imminent so it might be too late to help him, but then again it might not be. Anyway, he felt like the Monkeys were the best group for him to ask for help, so I said I would post for him his thoughts.

Am behind in my reading.
If I remember correctly the Dutch reporter who did the TV show and was accused by Joran of stealing Joran's hard drive.. DeVries (sp?) stated what Dept in Holland could address the conflict of interests the judges might have/had in Aruba.

I think in one TV interview that Paulus had mentioned that one and more of the judges has stayed at his house for they did that in order to cut down on expenses and it was a tradition of long standing (my words)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: IBE on December 11, 2007, 04:06:06 AM
When I say he planned this...I mean it was in the works for him to do this for some time...no trial...no one learns about the corruption or the cover up...no information...no one knows the truth...everyone goes home happy and AHATA goes back to work trying to save Crappy Island. JMO

I think you are so right, Lala.  But I think it has backfired to some
degree in that it has brought the case to the forefront once again.


Heh heh, IMO "backfired" like a shot in the foot :lol:  All this info was presented by Mos on Thanksgiving Day. Thurs. to Sun. on TV. Probably the biggest TV watching days in the US with all the football games.

IMO people who didn't know very much then or had never heard of the case know about it now. Millions more!

IMO more are questioning what is going on. This surely can't help the tourism and the people who are good in Aruba. Some may think of the "ugly American image" in other countries but we sure aren't dumb, maybe naive and slow but not dumb.

Still think Joe T. is posturing for the future, if the case is closed and if the FBI can step in. extradite Joran under the current US.NL treaties to the US for charges and a jury trial. To me, IMO, that is the only reason he is in this, unless it is his ego! or supposedly "family" ties.

By the way Paulus, zip your fly and open your mouth.. you and Joran bragged you would tell what happened to Natalee.

What happened to some of the evidence you and King (you know your friend who then was Head of the KIA and blocked one of the searches of your home) had in the Matthews case that went on to a Court located in the Hague where he won for violation of Human and Civil Rights. Weren't you King's Asst then at gathering or the lack of gathering evidence for the Prosecutor's Office where you worked there?

Lack of evidence in the Natalee case is the evidence as one Monkey has pointed out.

Did someone tie Han's hands? or was this in the game plan all along?   

Just some thoughts to ponder! IMO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8 - 12/11//2007
Post by: IBE on December 11, 2007, 04:09:16 AM
Still think Joe T. is posturing for the future, if the case is closed and if the FBI can step in. extradite Joran under the current US.NL treaties to the US for charges and a jury trial. To me, IMO, that is the only reason he is in this, unless it is his ego! or supposedly "family" ties.


add "money" to that.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: MumInOhio on December 11, 2007, 05:55:07 AM
Old post....interesting to read again RE: Koen
Anonymous said...
He was questioned right away but he has an airtight alibi. He was in south Florida visiting friends the when this happened. It was verified by pictures, talking to friends, his plane ticket and the fact that he was at a birthday party here with 78 witnesses! Dead end, AGAIN!!

Fri Jan 13, 03:08:00 PM EST   
~~~~~~~~~
Anonymous said...
also read today that someone unnamed had their alibi broken recently.

Mon Jan 16, 07:33:00 PM EST
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

BrownSugar said...
I know for a fact that there is a REAL witness (not the gardner, jogger, etc.) who actually SAW the three take off in Koen's boat during those couple hours before Mrs. Twitty arrived at the Van der Sloot home.

This witness can't come forward. He is too afraid for himself and his family. I don't even know if JVDS and Daddy even know about this witness. Remember, there's no such thing as a perfect crime.

However, if this witness talks, this case will break right open.

It all depends on whether or not someone (i.e. Joran, Deepak, Koen, Satish) want to come clean and save their country from utter demise.

Alas, we all know that Joran doesn't care about anyone but himself, so he will move on. He'll go back to Holland and act like royalty and keep repeating his lame saying, "I just want to get on with my life". What a selfish bastard.
Mon Jan 16, 08:55:00 PM EST   
http://arubanboycott.blogspot.com/2006/01/keep-close-eye-on-koen-gottenbos.html


Thanks Nut44x4 Interesting!

Leslie and Nut

If a possible third suspect arrested is Van der Sloot tennis partner, Freddy Zedan

A connection to the raquet club. Don't know if Freddy was born in Aruba though.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8 - 12/11//2007
Post by: Silverfox on December 11, 2007, 06:52:40 AM
Still think Joe T. is posturing for the future, if the case is closed and if the FBI can step in. extradite Joran under the current US.NL treaties to the US for charges and a jury trial. To me, IMO, that is the only reason he is in this, unless it is his ego! or supposedly "family" ties.


add "money" to that.

If everyone will focus on the corruption at all levels of government -- particularly at the top elected officials and also those judges then...and only then will "truth" prevail.  Joe T. is there because someone paid him to be there and to try to be the mouthpiece for US MSM... But connect the dots... Find out who is really paying him... or, where the source of funds is coming from to pay for him and you will be closer to the truth...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Hotshot on December 11, 2007, 06:58:08 AM
I would rather see them get one lick with the lash than none at all.
New information or not.
Only a messenger here, and I say anytime is good time also "prison time", but.....We all have to remember, They "The family" want it done right.  No seconds thoughts, no ands, ifs, or butts.  If that isn't there, then why do it.  All they really ever wanted was to know why and where.  It's not that they dont want a conviction, but half assed is no good.  For them right now, GOOD is having their daughter to bring home, and memorialize.  Then as the case is closed, they can have paperwork and do their own investigation.  Just remember anything new comes up, and it can break wide open all over again.  I kind of have to look at it like this.......I can't do anything about how, or why the Dr.s killed my mom, but at least I put her to rest, and not that my mind is at peace about it, but I have learned, and can pass the info on to more people about what NOT to do.  Did I make any sense?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8 - 12/11//2007
Post by: Silverfox on December 11, 2007, 06:59:49 AM
Get this!
Here in the Philippines I became acquainted with a Dutch businessman.

He used to have an import business between Brazil and the Netherlands.

He told me that he used to fly back and forth between both countries on a weekly basis.

I asked him if he ever, then made the stop to Aruba...(He loves to gamble)...

You know what he told me?

"Hell no!! Everyone in Holland views Aruba as being very corrupt and very dangerous... Not exactly a pleasant vacation stop if you have to be watching your back all the time..."

He told me, quite frankly, that only "stupid Americans" visit there... He really doesn't care much for America either -- but it was educational to learn he would much rather vacation in New Jersey or Nevada to gamble... and never, ever to Aruba.... There is more I could quote him on but I would get banned for such language -- even in Dutch...

LOL :lol:



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8 - 12/11//2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 11, 2007, 07:10:06 AM
MUM,  Freddie was born in Venezuela...date unknown to me. I cannot find DOB for him.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8 - 12/11//2007
Post by: MumInOhio on December 11, 2007, 07:20:09 AM
MUM,  Freddie was born in Venezuela...date unknown to me. I cannot find DOB for him.

Thanks...I was checking around for info on the racuet club and Freddie of course.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Pita on December 11, 2007, 07:23:43 AM
Hi Monkeys...I have a question..well, maybe a few.

Who is Maria Figaroa?  Refresh me on this one, please. TIA


Name: Maria Figaroa
Date: 22 June 2005 / 18:05
Pages: 2
Writer/Initiator: Giovanni Heyliger
Description: witness statement by a Carlos & Charlies employee

I wonder if Maria Figaroa is any relation to Kalpoe's new attorney?  Isn't his last name Figaroa?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8 - 12/11//2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 11, 2007, 07:33:03 AM
Someone asked earlier where he worked...Freddie worked at Champion’s Bar at the Marriott.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 11, 2007, 07:44:34 AM
Hi Monkeys...I have a question..well, maybe a few.

Who is Maria Figaroa?  Refresh me on this one, please. TIA


Name: Maria Figaroa
Date: 22 June 2005 / 18:05
Pages: 2
Writer/Initiator: Giovanni Heyliger
Description: witness statement by a Carlos & Charlies employee

I wonder if Maria Figaroa is any relation to Kalpoe's new attorney?  Isn't his last name Figaroa?

mmmmmmm.... Figueroa, I think.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
Post by: MumInOhio on December 11, 2007, 08:00:43 AM
Hi Monkeys...I have a question..well, maybe a few.

Who is Maria Figaroa?  Refresh me on this one, please. TIA


Name: Maria Figaroa
Date: 22 June 2005 / 18:05
Pages: 2
Writer/Initiator: Giovanni Heyliger
Description: witness statement by a Carlos & Charlies employee

I wonder if Maria Figaroa is any relation to Kalpoe's new attorney?  Isn't his last name Figaroa?

I wonder!!!! I tried to do some checking on him last week connected to a Thijsen Law offices. Just tried again. Error..page not found.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8 - 12/11//2007
Post by: MumInOhio on December 11, 2007, 08:12:09 AM
Hard to tell which is the correct spelling. The one Pita has is the one that's been in all the press lately and I found his ICQ under that. I am not sure which thread I'm posting in this morning.

Lala's will write us in her book!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8 - 12/11//2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 11, 2007, 08:43:12 AM
Although fees may vary from case to case, we at Thijsen & Figaroa Law Offices apply a standard AWG 400.00 (USD 225.00) charge per hour.

Yes....the site is down.... http://thijsenlaw.com/pagefees.htm

http://www.thijsenlaw.com/ has also gone poof.

Figaroa....Pita was correct


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8 - 12/11//2007
Post by: MumInOhio on December 11, 2007, 08:54:18 AM
Although fees may vary from case to case, we at Thijsen & Figaroa Law Offices apply a standard AWG 400.00 (USD 225.00) charge per hour.

Yes....the site is down.... http://thijsenlaw.com/pagefees.htm

http://www.thijsenlaw.com/ has also gone poof.

Figaroa....Pita was correct


Thanks Nut! Thought I saw he graduated from Aruba School of Law 2005 :shock: and born in 1979. That would make him a young pup!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8 - 12/11//2007
Post by: Leslie on December 11, 2007, 09:04:16 AM
Fox News
http://www.foxnews.com/
CNN
http://www.cnn.com/
Diario
http://www.diarioaruba.com/
Amigoe
http://www.amigoe.com/english/
BonDia
http://www.cspnv.com/
Solo di Pueblo
http://www.solodipueblo.com/
Aruba Today
http://www.arubatoday.com/
24ora
http://www.24ora.com/
Translator:
http://papiamentu.donamaro.nl



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8 - 12/11//2007
Post by: terryd270 on December 11, 2007, 09:26:59 AM
I always thought that we would never get too many answers from Aruba, its like their playground and they make the rules if there is any.. We try to play by the rules but actually there weren't any.. The killer's never had too much to worry about and the sad part is that I thought it was a small group of misfits but realized that there are more than I ever wanted to believe existed..  I don't think anything we find will ever bring this case back, I mean we had confessions and so much other evidence that disappeared, what will make anything else stay and become visible.. I guess knowing that Aruba will now have a big warning on it saying to "STAY AWAY" but there will be those that crave that kinda life and will go over there..  I hope we find some answers but will we ever see justice??  It seems they like toying with us on holidays and we keep waiting for someone on a white horse to come along and do the right thing.. Well hopefully there will be answers and justice in the future, its just I no longer believe I will see it..

td


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8 - 12/11//2007
Post by: oceanexploration on December 11, 2007, 09:36:59 AM
UPDATE: 11-Dec, 2007 - The Persistence is delayed for it's last long leg of the voyage to Aruba. It is scheduled to arrive on Saturday.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8 - 12/11//2007
Post by: MumInOhio on December 11, 2007, 10:04:32 AM
UPDATE: 11-Dec, 2007 - The Persistence is delayed for it's last long leg of the voyage to Aruba. It is scheduled to arrive on Saturday.

Thanks for the update. Is the delay weather related?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8 - 12/11//2007
Post by: oceanexploration on December 11, 2007, 10:08:31 AM
I should have stated it:  Tropical Storm Olga is causing the delay, along with 15+ft seas.
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t1/sloop-wv.html (http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t1/sloop-wv.html)



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8 - 12/11//2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 11, 2007, 10:22:59 AM
 :shock: OMG ......do stay safe!!!
http://www.orbit.nesdis.noaa.gov/smcd/opdb/aviation/loops/realtime/atlir_loope.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8 - 12/11//2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 11, 2007, 11:29:35 AM
hello??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8 - 12/11//2007
Post by: Anna on December 11, 2007, 11:29:58 AM
OceanExplorer,

Will the bad weather delays cut into the search time allotted?  This could be a real problem if it does, couldn't it?  How long of a time slot does this search have with the boat, equipment, etc.?



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8 - 12/11//2007
Post by: Tylergal on December 11, 2007, 11:32:15 AM
Someone asked earlier where he worked...Freddie worked at Champion’s Bar at the Marriott.

A ping sounded all the way to Bill's House (Willard Marriott).


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8 - 12/11//2007
Post by: Anna on December 11, 2007, 11:33:17 AM
(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Morning%20Aft%20Evening/thcoffeeanddonuts.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8 - 12/11//2007
Post by: Anna on December 11, 2007, 11:35:48 AM
TG,
Yep, and we should have known when multiple huge PR firms were called in that we were being given the old heave-ho.  None of this has been allowed to just play out on it's own.

But I do see this as a strategic misstep by Aruba as this is how they are going to be remembered long after the media is gone.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8 - 12/11//2007
Post by: Anna on December 11, 2007, 11:38:17 AM
O/T While much of the country is freezing and over 600K have power outages, we are blessed with beautiful weather today with high in Birmingham of 79.

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Morning%20Aft%20Evening/th027-1.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8 - 12/11//2007
Post by: Anna on December 11, 2007, 11:40:01 AM
Well, I can't get Klaas to #50 by myself.  Rumor has it some are already in the NEW thread!  And it aint' Robots!

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8 - 12/11//2007
Post by: Anna on December 11, 2007, 11:42:04 AM
(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Weekdays/thterrific1.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8 - 12/11//2007
Post by: MumInOhio on December 11, 2007, 11:42:24 AM
Someone asked earlier where he worked...Freddie worked at Champion’s Bar at the Marriott.

A ping sounded all the way to Bill's House (Willard Marriott).

Now I'm confused,again. I thought he worked at another bar and then went to the Marriott after all this.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8 - 12/11//2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 11, 2007, 11:42:47 AM
Someone asked earlier where he worked...Freddie worked at Champion’s Bar at the Marriott.

A ping sounded all the way to Bill's House (Willard Marriott).

Merian Ernest Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2005 3:18 pm Post subject: GSM Orwellian
What is wrong? The brothers had to be separated. The Babylonians have layed it thick and hard, but couldn't get what they asked for.

Tricked out cars and pc's. One decided to stay home and the other went to help. The Babylonians knew he was a bifrons. He bleeped on the screen all the way to Bill's lodgings.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8 - 12/11//2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 11, 2007, 11:43:52 AM
Well, I can't get Klaas to #50 by myself.  Rumor has it some are already in the NEW thread!  And it aint' Robots!

.

Will this do it?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8 - 12/11//2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 11, 2007, 11:44:17 AM
Well, I can't get Klaas to #50 by myself.  Rumor has it some are already in the NEW thread!  And it aint' Robots!

.

Will this do it?

Almost there....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8 - 12/11//2007
Post by: Anna on December 11, 2007, 11:51:39 AM
I think there are only a few days left before everyone in the Aruban government will disappear for for the Holidays.  Not much going to happen after that and then Mos will return and declare this is not going to trial.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8 - 12/11//2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 11, 2007, 11:54:24 AM
O/T While much of the country is freezing and over 600K have power outages, we are blessed with beautiful weather today with high in Birmingham of 79.

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Morning%20Aft%20Evening/th027-1.jpg)


(http://bestsmileys.com/hitting/2.gif)       -6 here this morning... yes I said 6 BELOW zero,  ugh.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8 - 12/11//2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 11, 2007, 11:55:11 AM
Well, I can't get Klaas to #50 by myself.  Rumor has it some are already in the NEW thread!  And it aint' Robots!

.


I was there....lol.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8 - 12/11//2007
Post by: Anna on December 11, 2007, 11:55:29 AM
(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Dogs%20of%20Mine/20071201_0178.jpg)  (http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Dogs%20of%20Mine/IMG_1154.jpg)  (http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Dogs%20of%20Mine/IMG_1156.jpg)


Can anyone say WHITE Christmas???


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8 - 12/11//2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 11, 2007, 11:56:07 AM
AWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW!!!!!!!!!!!! HOW CUTE!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8 - 12/11//2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 11, 2007, 11:56:22 AM
O/T While much of the country is freezing and over 600K have power outages, we are blessed with beautiful weather today with high in Birmingham of 79.

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Morning%20Aft%20Evening/th027-1.jpg)


(http://bestsmileys.com/hitting/2.gif)       -6 here this morning... yes I said 6 BELOW zero,  ugh.

Now that's cold!!!  We are supposed to get to the mid or high 70's today.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8 - 12/11//2007
Post by: MumInOhio on December 11, 2007, 11:56:35 AM
I'll help...think we need one more though!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8 - 12/11//2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 11, 2007, 11:56:47 AM
AWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW!!!!!!!!!!!! HOW CUTE!!!


OMG I WANT ONE!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8 - 12/11//2007
Post by: Anna on December 11, 2007, 11:56:57 AM
O/T While much of the country is freezing and over 600K have power outages, we are blessed with beautiful weather today with high in Birmingham of 79.

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Morning%20Aft%20Evening/th027-1.jpg)


(http://bestsmileys.com/hitting/2.gif)       -6 here this morning... yes I said 6 BELOW zero,  ugh.

Gosh, Nuts,

Where do you live, the Yukon???


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8 - 12/11//2007
Post by: klaasend on December 11, 2007, 11:57:16 AM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub2/1LOCKED.gif)


Please move to NCD# 704

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2439.0


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8 - 12/11//2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 11, 2007, 11:57:28 AM
How come no one is locking this, lol.. :2doh: