Scared Monkeys Discussion Forum

Natalee Holloway => LCD Archive => Topic started by: San on January 03, 2008, 07:45:37 PM



Title: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: San on January 03, 2008, 07:45:37 PM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/NH2008.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 03, 2008, 09:40:16 PM
http://nholloway.blogspot.com/

Wednesday, January 2, 2008
X. Persistence
 
Update: 03-Jan 2200 hrs
As the Persistence travels through the turquoise Aruban waters to start another day of searching, onlooking swimming seabirds and flying fish curiously come alongside the boat. We worked all day and will continue working through the night. As we work on, we maintain a rhythm yet avoid routine. Over-familiarity risks carelessness and worse, complacency. For any one of us to even momentarily let our focus down opens the door for utter failure. The tremendous progress so far was only made possible with a very strong team, excellent leadership, planning, and prayer. There have been many times when there is nothing to say, times when nothing can be said, and times when words alone cannot describe the situation. We will continue on through the night, until the beckoning glow of the rising sun silhouettes our return to the dock.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 03, 2008, 10:31:41 PM
http://nholloway.blogspot.com/

Wednesday, January 2, 2008
X. Persistence
 
Update: 03-Jan 2200 hrs
As the Persistence travels through the turquoise Aruban waters to start another day of searching, onlooking swimming seabirds and flying fish curiously come alongside the boat. We worked all day and will continue working through the night. As we work on, we maintain a rhythm yet avoid routine. Over-familiarity risks carelessness and worse, complacency. For any one of us to even momentarily let our focus down opens the door for utter failure. The tremendous progress so far was only made possible with a very strong team, excellent leadership, planning, and prayer. There have been many times when there is nothing to say, times when nothing can be said, and times when words alone cannot describe the situation. We will continue on through the night, until the beckoning glow of the rising sun silhouettes our return to the dock.



Thoughts & prayers with the Persistence crew....



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Magnolia on January 03, 2008, 10:31:57 PM
Those people in those pool party pictures look like Drag Queens. :shock:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 03, 2008, 10:38:18 PM
Those people in those pool party pictures look like Drag Queens. :shock:

I don't understand the guy with the painted animal face.  What did that have to do with a birthday party?  And when does the birthday boy entertain everyone?  It was bizarre the first time I saw it and it still is.  Did we ever decide who those men were with the Minister?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: robots on January 03, 2008, 10:51:26 PM
i heard Anna was looking for me..

klass. please send her my email address ---pick whatever one you want  :cool: :lol:

unless that is. if she is mad at me, an if she is,tell her you have not seen me

thank you for your cooperation  :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Magnolia on January 03, 2008, 10:58:28 PM
Those people in those pool party pictures look like Drag Queens. :shock:

I don't understand the guy with the painted animal face.  What did that have to do with a birthday party?  And when does the birthday boy entertain everyone?  It was bizarre the first time I saw it and it still is.  Did we ever decide who those men were with the Minister?

The painted animal face is another drag thing. 
Is the minister the one in the straw hat?...love that outfit!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Magnolia on January 03, 2008, 11:06:49 PM
Klaas, have you seen the Mos thread at RU?
MF is back with a vengence and Debbie is giving Wang and MF what for.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 03, 2008, 11:07:50 PM
Klaas, have you seen the Mos thread at RU?
MF is back with a vengence and Debbie is giving Wang and MF what for.

Yes, I've been following it  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Tylergal on January 03, 2008, 11:10:23 PM
Those people in those pool party pictures look like Drag Queens. :shock:

I don't understand the guy with the painted animal face.  What did that have to do with a birthday party?  And when does the birthday boy entertain everyone?  It was bizarre the first time I saw it and it still is.  Did we ever decide who those men were with the Minister?

It is hard to explain why these people do these things but my first thought when I saw all the going's on from this island were doped, drugged, drunk and depraved.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Tylergal on January 03, 2008, 11:11:32 PM
Lala's, do you want to tell us about your premonition?

Klaas, can you bring that conversation over here? 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 03, 2008, 11:11:59 PM
:shock: Who else maybe related to Dompig that we don't know about?

The Dompig bunch
The Dompig bunch
That's the way we became
The Dompig bunch

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub2/RelatedtoDompig.jpg)



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Icehawk on January 03, 2008, 11:14:53 PM
Hello everyone.  When Natalee disappeared in May of 2005 was Anita in Holland?  And were the other two boys with her or Pauls?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 03, 2008, 11:15:08 PM
Lala's, do you want to tell us about your premonition?

Klaas, can you bring that conversation over here? 

Which conversation and where is it?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 03, 2008, 11:17:06 PM
Hello everyone.  When Natalee disappeared in May of 2005 was Anita in Holland?  And were the other two boys with her or Pauls?

Depends upon who you ask.  According to the Sloots, when Natalee went missing Anita was still in the NL but Valintijn and Sebastian were home with PVDS and Joran.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Magnolia on January 03, 2008, 11:20:42 PM
Hello everyone.  When Natalee disappeared in May of 2005 was Anita in Holland?  And were the other two boys with her or Pauls?

Depends upon who you ask.  According to the Sloots, when Natalee went missing Anita was still in the NL but Valintijn and Sebastian were home with PVDS and Joran.

It has always been my opinion that the two younger boys were with
Anita in the NL.  But there is no conformation of that.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: private eye on January 03, 2008, 11:31:46 PM
http://nholloway.blogspot.com/

Wednesday, January 2, 2008
X. Persistence
 
Update: 03-Jan 2200 hrs
As the Persistence travels through the turquoise Aruban waters to start another day of searching, onlooking swimming seabirds and flying fish curiously come alongside the boat. We worked all day and will continue working through the night. As we work on, we maintain a rhythm yet avoid routine. Over-familiarity risks carelessness and worse, complacency. For any one of us to even momentarily let our focus down opens the door for utter failure. The tremendous progress so far was only made possible with a very strong team, excellent leadership, planning, and prayer. There have been many times when there is nothing to say, times when nothing can be said, and times when words alone cannot describe the situation. We will continue on through the night, until the beckoning glow of the rising sun silhouettes our return to the dock.



God is definitely on the side of right and the fact that only the hand of God could have directed all of you good people to create and assemble this equipment and boat, and then to utilize it in the search for Natalee, tells me that He has Natalee in his house and His calming hand clasped with Beth's hand comforting her and providing her strength.

As in all searches done professionally as this one is, there is no way to have searched in vain. It is important to eliminate potential areas for her remains to be located, as it greatly reduces the possibilities where she might be found. You are searching not only a large area but one that has here to fore been unsearchable. That said I know that I am still very optimistic that you will find Natalee, but either way I am deeply appreciative of the enormity of all of your contributions. All of you are mighty fine people and Beth is certainly being blessed to have your contributions.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: private eye on January 03, 2008, 11:36:32 PM
I think that this may prove to be an excellent summary of all legal in this case. I have not finished with it, and just how much it applies to Aruba I cannot determine yet, but it just might be worth reading for those who are interested. If someone has previously posted of it, I apologize but won't be surprised as this group seems to have digested every word written that touches this case. And it always helps to have more than one persons eyes and interpretation, so I am posting the link below.


http://www.law.wits.ac.za/humanrts/cat/antilles1994.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 03, 2008, 11:41:45 PM
Hello everyone.  When Natalee disappeared in May of 2005 was Anita in Holland?  And were the other two boys with her or Pauls?

Depends upon who you ask.  According to the Sloots, when Natalee went missing Anita was still in the NL but Valintijn and Sebastian were home with PVDS and Joran.

It has always been my opinion that the two younger boys were with
Anita in the NL.  But there is no conformation of that.

Mine also,Especially if that is PVDS on the video drinking and gambling next to Natalee at 8:30PM. He claims that he left the casino hours earlier because Sebastian was gonna be dropped off at home :roll: Why would he lie about that? I guess because he could,by the time he even made that statement Anita and the kids were already home. I don't know how old Sebastian was,maybee 10 or 12? But it was a school night and PVDS would not be out drinking and gambling if the youngest was at home and it being after 8pm. It  looks to me like both Joran and Paulus were at play while Anita and the younger boys were away.IMO

(http://img518.imageshack.us/img518/9554/casino1cn5uf2.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)






Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Icehawk on January 03, 2008, 11:59:39 PM
Hello everyone.  When Natalee disappeared in May of 2005 was Anita in Holland?  And were the other two boys with her or Pauls?

Depends upon who you ask.  According to the Sloots, when Natalee went missing Anita was still in the NL but Valintijn and Sebastian were home with PVDS and Joran.

It has always been my opinion that the two younger boys were with
Anita in the NL.  But there is no conformation of that.

Mine also,Especially if that is PVDS on the video drinking and gambling next to Natalee at 8:30PM. He claims that he left the casino hours earlier because Sebastian was gonna be dropped off at home :roll: Why would he lie about that? I guess because he could,by the time he even made that statement Anita and the kids were already home. I don't know how old Sebastian was,maybee 10 or 12? But it was a school night and PVDS would not be out drinking and gambling if the youngest was at home and it being after 8pm. It  looks to me like both Joran and Paulus were at play while Anita and the younger boys were away.IMO

(http://img518.imageshack.us/img518/9554/casino1cn5uf2.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)




Thank you.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: texasmom on January 04, 2008, 12:06:09 AM
Hello everyone.  When Natalee disappeared in May of 2005 was Anita in Holland?  And were the other two boys with her or Pauls?

Depends upon who you ask.  According to the Sloots, when Natalee went missing Anita was still in the NL but Valintijn and Sebastian were home with PVDS and Joran.

It has always been my opinion that the two younger boys were with
Anita in the NL.  But there is no conformation of that.

Mine also,Especially if that is PVDS on the video drinking and gambling next to Natalee at 8:30PM. He claims that he left the casino hours earlier because Sebastian was gonna be dropped off at home :roll: Why would he lie about that? I guess because he could,by the time he even made that statement Anita and the kids were already home. I don't know how old Sebastian was,maybee 10 or 12? But it was a school night and PVDS would not be out drinking and gambling if the youngest was at home and it being after 8pm. It  looks to me like both Joran and Paulus were at play while Anita and the younger boys were away.IMO

(http://img518.imageshack.us/img518/9554/casino1cn5uf2.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)






I have many of the same questions about all of this, I posted in the theories area a little while ago....  If the younger sons were with AVDS than there are SO MANY lies in PVDS statements regarding that evening and the next couple of days.  I seem to recall statements about the younger boys catching the school bus etc.  It's just too convenient in my opinion that AVDS remained in Holland until after the crime.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 04, 2008, 12:32:57 AM
Hello everyone.  When Natalee disappeared in May of 2005 was Anita in Holland?  And were the other two boys with her or Pauls?
I have many of the same questions about all of this, I posted in the theories area a little while ago....  If the younger sons were with AVDS than there are SO MANY lies in PVDS statements regarding that evening and the next couple of days.  I seem to recall statements about the younger boys catching the school bus etc.  It's just too convenient in my opinion that AVDS remained in Holland until after the crime.

PVDS is lying bigtime as his forgetfull memory would indicate. Hard to tell for sure exactly what are definite lies though  :-? I believe two things he did tell the truth about is when he told people he had two contacts with Natalee and picked/dropped off her&joran up at 4AM. We know he then changed his story saying that isn't true. He was probably nailed on wiretaps explaining his situation to friends of his so they could help cover his tracks. Witnesses also heard him say 4AM that first night,So they have him on tape and witnesses that heard the same thing. It's not like it was one simple mistake of someone mis-inerpeting 11pm as 4am. The only person as interested in the HI/Casino video's as Natalee's Family was PVDS.

Deepak's statement "Your Own Father..Unbelievable" I think is quite telling. In my opinion he said it because PVDS covered up the crimes,never got Natalee help and arranged her burial. It is possible PVDS is even more involved than that.MO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Tylergal on January 04, 2008, 12:43:43 AM
Lala's, do you want to tell us about your premonition?

Klaas, can you bring that conversation over here? 

Which conversation and where is it?

Mos thread at RU.  I am sorry, but I had to go see the Romney boys.  They were being interviewed.  My what some good looking guys.  Maybe they could just run as a unit to be president.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 04, 2008, 12:55:53 AM
Lala's, do you want to tell us about your premonition?

Klaas, can you bring that conversation over here? 

Which conversation and where is it?

Mos thread at RU.  I am sorry, but I had to go see the Romney boys.  They were being interviewed.  My what some good looking guys.  Maybe they could just run as a unit to be president.

Tylergal, it's several pages long now and really nothing more that bickering back and forth with an occasional vile post by WangChung inbetween.  Not worth reading actually, IMO.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Sue on January 04, 2008, 12:57:55 AM
Has there been any news today about Kalpoe/Phil court hearing today???


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 04, 2008, 01:01:07 AM
Has there been any news today about Kalpoe/Phil court hearing today???

Hi Sue,

I havent seen anything.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Sue on January 04, 2008, 01:06:55 AM
Has there been any news today about Kalpoe/Phil court hearing today???

Hi Sue,

I havent seen anything.

crapola the pins are hurting my ass that I am sitting on waiting


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Port Valerie on January 04, 2008, 01:15:11 AM
My prayers go up for the Persistence crew and the work you are doing.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 04, 2008, 01:15:16 AM
Has there been any news today about Kalpoe/Phil court hearing today???

Hi Sue,

I havent seen anything.

crapola the pins are hurting my ass that I am sitting on waiting

lol. Yes It's been going on for what over a year already? The Dishonorable Judge Wit wrote that letter to the Dr.Phil Attys explaining why some of the the case files could not be released until a decision of the case has been made.  We know thats been done,now what?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 04, 2008, 01:16:18 AM
Posted by Victor at Scrux:

Interview with Hans Mos (translation) - Bon Dia
 


Please note the mere part of the article is the opinion of the interviewer/author of the article, Mos is quoted about 12 times, even if it may seem otherwise, that is the way the article is written)



HANS MOS DOES NOT UNDERSTAND IRRITATION ABOUT THE ROLE OF THE KLPD.

"When an investigation is stuck, it is only logical to let others help look for the solution?"
The Fiscal Mayor esteems the case of Natalee Holloway has cost between 5- 10 million dollars.

Oranjestad, still no solution in the case of Natalee Holloway was a reason for frustration for some to decide that the work did not come to a conclusion.
But a frustration does not have to be negative, the contrary. The opinion of Hans Mos, the sentiment here results in staying to keep putting energy in the case in order to be finally able close the case with a solution.

And now the solution will have to stay in the hands of the 4 researchers of the organ of police of Aruba, under the supervision of commissar Dolfi Richardson, who will have the responsibility to investigate new information about the case.
The case which has cost a lot of money, efforts and which has created much tension, for sure for someone who was in charge of the investigation, who still was not able to produce the image of what really happened to Natalee Holloway.

CRITISISM ABOUT THE ARUBAN POLICE.
Mr Hans Mos was not very clear if one day there will be a rapport of evaluation about how the investigation process had went.
For example there was strong criticism from the part of the family of Natalee Holloway about the the time it had taken on Aruba to arrest those who had been last with the young girl before she disappeared.
Here Mos was careful to give his opinion even more because he himself does not know the arguments of the authorities back then.
"I was not responsible for what happened back then, but I can tell that the decision they took was integer".

Without a doubt, Hans Mos was in an article in the Telegraaf addressing faults made by the old team.
Although Mos admits the Dutch paper is known for sensationalism, he denies to have ever said something like that about the former team. "There are things in the article I have never said", Mos says. "The only thing that I said is that some things did not end up in paper, and of which we thought could tell us more, so we went back and listened to the phone conversations and revised all the results of the old investigation. And based upon that, we were able to get more information", and once more Hans Mos does not give his opinion about the past situation, but used the popular Dutch figure of speech: 'Door de bomen het bos niet meer zien' to describe a psychological process that can occur inside an investigation team when there is a large quantity of information.
"And this is not to insult, it happens and ppl in Holland recognize it". In the past sense it is also necessary to criticize the work one has done. And to criticize your own work is something difficult according to Hans Mos, whom took the "journey" of becoming the help of a third person.

Of the form here can be determined if true was seen in one angle, if had to turned to all routes necessary, and if something went unnoticed.
"This whole journey has some doors open, and this happens in an investigation of the police it is good to have another who can throw in a new view, and can attribute attention to the aspects here".
And although the KLPD did take charge of the investigation second phase, it was important to include persons of the Aruban police who had knowledge of the case, And more had quality of Aruban personal who teamed up with the KLPD in the last investigation. The local analysts were of importance to give continuation of the investigation because their knowledge of the case was good.

Hans Mos does not understand the irritation which exists close to some members of the old investigation team, about the way the KLPD works. The Head Commissar has given the of two teams consisting team to do the investigation, for example the first journey, does not question the collaboration of the first team, but also a result of the circumstances, an example, the the way the new investigation team had to obtain permission to investigate the houses of the persons who were last with Natalee is due to the analyses of the dossier, new questions had arisen.
And had to get the warrant based upon new information for new permission. The Head Commissar does not appreciate the accusation "because the Dutch are involved in the case now, they are able achieve more, if an investigation is getting stuck it is only logical to go look for help to have others help search for the solution. This creates the impression that is bad for a solution in the case. "In the opinion of Mos, to police officers of heart and with the intention to look at a case to come to a conclusion, it does not matter how that can be achieved.

INVESTIGATION IN AMERICA COULD HAVE BEEN MORE, BUT WITHOUT OTHER RESULT.
And is the base of the questioner self, the big question, did they not have to investigate more profound the youngsters who were together with Natalee Holloway during her stay in Aruba.
It was talked about by some, and true the process in the USA was dirigated by the lawyers of the youngsters, is it the true is that the FBI inter mediated to be able to talk with a select group, but the questions were controlled by the approval of the lawyers.
Hans Mos is reacting by saying, he did not have the responsibility for that past process, and because he does not have enough information with the wish to talk to the young Americans to be able to give an opinion.
"The only thing I can tell is, in my work as a professional, one has to look into all options to be able to eliminate", according to Mos.
Even if it may not be necessary to say the way the option was handled and some do not understand, but one has to determine a certain direction of the investigation and be able to add on things.

If Mos believes it had been good if for example the investigation in American had been bigger (I have constatated this had not been done in the proper way) he thinks the process will not produce anything. "No, I do not have even a single indication now that the solution of the case is to be found in America". Mos has to confess, secure in his concept in spite of some sort of explanation the scenario of the Pubic Ministerie in this (based upon the investigation) is one more plausible. In other words, the Head Commissar remains certain at the three youngsters who were the last with Natalee Holloway.
(red. the conversation with Mos took place just when the lawyer of Satish and Deepak contradicted the suspicions of the OM, being that Deepak Kalpoe had admitted Natalee is dead. According to the lawyers the investigation simply had one internet conversation out of context).

ACTIONS WERE MOTIVE FOR SUSPICION.
Thus the Public Minister is convinced that they know in general what has happened to Natalee Holloway, but does not know the details, and also is not sure if a criminal act took place. "The only thing to tell is that we believe that these three persons have the key of her story." And for Hans Mos it is difficult to believe that an accident happened to Natalee simply because, based on, among other things a conversation of one of the three had 5 hours after the young disappeared girl was last seen being on tape.
This one of the three to another gives account of something had happened. If it was an accident, they did not call for help.
According to Mos, the main question to the trio was if they are responsible not one thought logical provided that in case of Natalee an accident had happened.
"The own actions of the trio has resulted in the suspicion of them. But again, that was not enough proof they had committed a crime".

AN INVESTIGATION THAT COSTED MILLIONS OF DOLLARS
The investigation has costs millions of dollars, the investigation here with the usage of technologies cellphone conversations and the so called chats, if not for the famous F16's which searched for the possible burial place and the intervention of the Dutch Forensic Institute, Hans Mos says he did not do a calculation of the exact amount, but without including the salaries the investigation of Natalee Holloway costs somewhere between 5 and 10 million dollars.
And this is a dilemma, because although to have been invited to enforce a place in the investigation, you are left with no solution.
"But you have to ask how much is the life of a person worth".

INVESTIGATION TO FOLLOW
In the same time at the quarters of the Cuerpo Policial Aruban will stay working on the investigation and is responsible to complete the puzzle, according to Mos who draws a certain image.
"We cannot tell what who is doing, but the investigators are so fascinated with the case that even in their free time they come to review the case. Although the case is a cold case they say they will keep it alive."


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 04, 2008, 01:29:47 AM
My prayers go up for the Persistence crew and the work you are doing.

MIne also! I hope they are on the verge on making history and bringing Natalee home. She has to be out there! WHere else could she be besides the western side of Aruba a few miles out? Why make it more difficult for themselves back in June 2005? The Perps never dreamed a team like the Persistence would be out there ever looking for Natalee Holloway.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Helen Back on January 04, 2008, 01:29:52 AM

AN INVESTIGATION THAT COSTED MILLIONS OF DOLLARS
The investigation has costs millions of dollars, the investigation here with the usage of technologies cellphone conversations and the so called chats, if not for the famous F16's which searched for the possible burial place and the intervention of the Dutch Forensic Institute, Hans Mos says he did not do a calculation of the exact amount, but without including the salaries the investigation of Natalee Holloway costs somewhere between 5 and 10 million dollars.
And this is a dilemma, because although to have been invited to enforce a place in the investigation, you are left with no solution.
"But you have to ask how much is the life of a person worth".

I would guess you're about to find out.

Goodnight monkeys.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: igsigs on January 04, 2008, 01:30:18 AM
What Lazlo's translation shows ...  is MF editing out Mos comments about the evidence and strong suspicions against J2K - and editing out a Mos comment about zero indications that any answers would come from the U.S..

It's pathetic.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: igsigs on January 04, 2008, 01:33:35 AM
And FWIW - i am nearly sure that MF is scubajap's daughter. Annalisa Klein/Gesterkamp (sp).


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Kat_Gram on January 04, 2008, 01:34:11 AM
What did Mos say ? Lots of words, but I can discern nothing.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: igsigs on January 04, 2008, 01:38:43 AM
What did Mos say ? Lots of words, but I can discern nothing.

Telling ALE/Aruba that solving the case is better than not. And to STFU and quit whining. IMO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 04, 2008, 01:42:10 AM
Igsigs - yes..MF is a real piece of work.  So..Scubajap's daughter huh?  Wonder if Scubajap sometimes uses MF's nick too?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Kat_Gram on January 04, 2008, 01:48:41 AM
What did Mos say ? Lots of words, but I can discern nothing.

Telling ALE/Aruba that solving the case is better than not. And to STFU and quit whining. IMO
TY. Why can't these Dutch ppl learn how to speak English !  :roll:Mos sounds like a political windbag. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 04, 2008, 01:49:47 AM
Igsigs - yes..MF is a real piece of work.  So..Scubajap's daughter huh?  Wonder if Scubajap sometimes uses MF's nick too?
That is interesting. I bet she got a good deal on Koens boat when they fled Aruba :-x . I think the moment has passed and Scuba should explain why she made this statement.

(Talking about Lorenzo Van Rijn)
Has his own boat, I had mentioned him previously.
But, they did bring him in twice, searched his boat, his house, his car and no forensics.
This is a little more complicated than I can fully explain here, let's just say it has always bothered me why they didn't question him like they questioned Joran, and leave it at that for the moment, OK?
Posted by: scubajap | Oct 16, 2005 10:07:43 PM


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: igsigs on January 04, 2008, 01:50:21 AM
Igsigs - yes..MF is a real piece of work.  So..Scubajap's daughter huh?  Wonder if Scubajap sometimes uses MF's nick too?

I would not be surprised if she did - but probably not that often. MF more likely to know pap/dutch than mom.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: igsigs on January 04, 2008, 02:00:49 AM
Yeah Kat, Mos is a windbag. Over and over and over he acts surprised at the lack of cooperation and motivation amongst the powers-that-be on Aruba. Clue 1 that the KLPD should have cast a wider net in their investigation.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 04, 2008, 02:04:35 AM
Igsigs - yes..MF is a real piece of work.  So..Scubajap's daughter huh?  Wonder if Scubajap sometimes uses MF's nick too?
That is interesting. I bet she got a good deal on Koens boat when they fled Aruba :-x . I think the moment has passed and Scuba should explain why she made this statement.

(Talking about Lorenzo Van Rijn)
Has his own boat, I had mentioned him previously.
But, they did bring him in twice, searched his boat, his house, his car and no forensics.
This is a little more complicated than I can fully explain here, let's just say it has always bothered me why they didn't question him like they questioned Joran, and leave it at that for the moment, OK?
Posted by: scubajap | Oct 16, 2005 10:07:43 PM

It's bothered me too  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 04, 2008, 02:06:32 AM
GOODNIGHT ALL - tomorrow I'll be working and lurking again so don't send out the search team looking for me, ok?  :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 04, 2008, 02:11:35 AM
Yeah Kat, Mos is a windbag. Over and over and over he acts surprised at the lack of cooperation and motivation amongst the powers-that-be on Aruba. Clue 1 that the KLPD should have cast a wider net in their investigation.

Mos=FOS is exactly right. They waited 10 days to make the arrest,17 days to issue a warrant that they changed at the last seconds to just Jorans room,blood that turned into chocolate and the confession and NH being confirmed dead that never happened. Not to mention PVDS best friend leading the Investigation. Even Judge Wit said last week that Dompig obstructed Justice and didnt want them to search the rest of the VDS property.  And that one paragraph is all Mos has to say about criticism of the police force..  :-x :-?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 04, 2008, 02:13:17 AM
GOODNIGHT ALL - tomorrow I'll be working and lurking again so don't send out the search team looking for me, ok?  :lol:

I think we may need to send one out for Rob  :wink:

Night!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 04, 2008, 02:23:58 AM
Hey Kyle! Crank up Sweet Home Alabama next time you feel like you may need a little  luck :cool: It is really about time something goes this girls way. Godspeed


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: texasmom on January 04, 2008, 02:32:57 AM
Hey Kyle! Crank up Sweet Home Alabama next time you feel like you may need a little  luck :cool: It is really about time something goes this girls way. Godspeed
amen to that *******!
 :thumright:         :smt035

Edited to add
Sweet Home Alabama  :D
http://youtube.com/watch?v=huLklsj_5HI


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: texasmom on January 04, 2008, 02:56:18 AM
thanks *******! :smt055


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: MumInOhio on January 04, 2008, 06:24:35 AM
IIRC it was posted that Hiram lived next door to Posner or really close. There were posts about 'what did you see through the window'. Do I have the right guy? May have been Tony that posted this, though I do recall Kawish was asked about him.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Buckeye on January 04, 2008, 07:05:05 AM
IIRC it was posted that Hiram lived next door to Posner or really close. There were posts about 'what did you see through the window'. Do I have the right guy? May have been Tony that posted this, though I do recall Kawish was asked about him.

Mum

Just stopped in to answer.  IIRC, Florida was involved in posting about the window, etc.  At times, Florida posted many theories in a way to make them sound like fact. I'm not sure it was.

Kawish had discussed a picture of Hiram and Aline at a possible high class VIP club.  He did say something about Hiram seeing her after that night but I think he was discussing a comment from another board.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: MumInOhio on January 04, 2008, 07:22:30 AM
IIRC it was posted that Hiram lived next door to Posner or really close. There were posts about 'what did you see through the window'. Do I have the right guy? May have been Tony that posted this, though I do recall Kawish was asked about him.

Mum

Just stopped in to answer.  IIRC, Florida was involved in posting about the window, etc.  At times, Florida posted many theories in a way to make them sound like fact. I'm not sure it was.

Kawish had discussed a picture of Hiram and Aline at a possible high class VIP club.  He did say something about Hiram seeing her after that night but I think he was discussing a comment from another board.


Thanks Buckeye...was it you discussing the blood on the mattress a couple of months ago. Some posters did a lot of research and I believe it was decided that ALE could not have distinguished human or dog blood without forensics. TIA


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Buckeye on January 04, 2008, 08:08:24 AM
Mum

Not me.  Very early in the case, some of us did research regarding blood.  There was an interesting forensic study, involving, I believe a body in a well.  Long story, short:  dog's blood was used to throw off the scent of the dogs.  Interesting that there are so many strays on Aruba.  Would be pretty easy to lure a stray and then kill him......Guess that would pertain to dogs and people....on that island.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 04, 2008, 08:12:37 AM
Those people in those pool party pictures look like Drag Queens. :shock:


I have seen photos of the same people from the Karma Lounge photo site......ummmmm Magic 96.5 photo gallery. Pretty scary.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: msmarple on January 04, 2008, 08:59:24 AM
http://news.diario-aruba.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=blogcategory&id=13&Itemid=30 (http://news.diario-aruba.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=blogcategory&id=13&Itemid=30)

Link is to Diario's Local news section.


man apparently tries to attack a tourist couple at high rise hotel. No video image captured.

Quote
Turistanan a core huy di homber cu supuesto mal intencion       
Friday, 04 January 2008 

ORANJESTAD (AAN): Riba e segundo dia di aña, Central di Polis a dirigi patruya di Strandpolitie na un Highrise Hotel relaciona cu un caso di atraco.

Tabata 12’or di merdia cu e caso a worde reporta, y pesey a dirigi personal di Strandpolitie na e hotel en cuestion.

Na yegada agentenan a papia cu e señora di inicialnan C.P. naci na Brasil di 26 aña. Segun declaracion, cu alrededor di 1’or y pico di madruga, e tabata cu su partner direccion di e hotel. Na dado momento un homber a acerca nan y ta yega mas cerca pa a gara nan.

Pero tanto e denunciante y su partner masculino tumando na cuenta di e intencion di e individuo, no solamente a spanta pero nan a core bay direccion di e hotel.

Ta ora nan a core drenta lobby y bay den Lift, nan a wak atras e supuesto atracador a desaparece.
A base di e informe suministra na e personal di Strandpolitie a revisa e video ya cu tin camera sofistica instala, y esaki a capta loke ta move den vecindario di e hotel.

Pero segun informe, no tabatin imagen di e sucedido, tampoco di coremento. Tog e caso tin debido atencion di autoridad concerni.

Online Pap translation:

turistanan owing to core huy of man cu supuesto bad intencion
friday, 04 january 2008

oranjestad (aan): on the second day of year, central of police owing to dirigi patrol of strandpolitie at one highrise hotel relaciona cu one caso of atraco.

was 12’or of afternoon cu the caso owing to worde reporta, y pesey owing to dirigi personal of strandpolitie at the hotel provided that cuestion.

at arrival agentenan owing to talk cu the madam of inicialnan c.p. naci at brasil of 26 year. according declaracion, cu alrededor of 1’or y pico of madruga, the was cu his partner direccion of the hotel. at dado instant one man owing to acerca they y is arrive more close for owing to grab they.

but tanto the denunciante y his partner masculino tumando at cuenta of the intencion of the individual, not only owing to spanta but they owing to core bay direccion of the hotel.

is hour they owing to core enter lobby y bay in lift, they owing to look at behind the supuesto atracador owing to desaparece.
owing to base of the informe suministra at the personal of strandpolitie owing to revisa the video already cu have camera sofistica instala, y this owing to capta thing is actuate in vecindario of the hotel.

but according informe, not had imagen of the sucedido, niether of coremento. tog the caso have debido atencion of autoridad concerni.

* * *
"Tommy" hit man "W." in the head with a with beer bottle; left him bleeding.

Quote
Homber tur na sanger a rechaza tur yudanza di autoridad       
Friday, 04 January 2008 

ORANJESTAD (AAN): Tabata laat den oranan di marduga, un homber conocido di polis, esta un tal B. a duna tip na Polis, indicando cu patras di un supermercado tin un homber benta tur na sanger.

Polis a tuma e tip na serio y a dicidi di bay tira un bista y enberdad nan a topa cu e homber di fam W. cu su cabez cubri cu sanger.

Segun W. cu algun choller a maltrate, un di e anti-socialnan aki ta un tal “Tommy”. E tal Tommy a dal e cu un boter cervez den cabez.

Ademas e victima a bisa polis, cu e no tin mester di yudanza, ni di polis y tampoco servicio di ambulans.

Na diferente ocasion, polis a puntra y ofrece e compay aki tur golpia pa yude , cada vez e tabata nenga e oferta.

Na dado momento riba su propio forza, W. a lanta para riba su pianan y a cana direccion Village.
Patruya a sigui tras di W., pa averigua kico ta su intencion.

Na un cas den Village pa ser exacto Caya Bonaire, el a drenta un parcela y asina tambe el a yega cas sano y salvo.

Mientras tanto polis despues a tira un bista den vecindario si acaso nan por localiza e tal “Tommy” pero sin ningun resultado.

Online Pap translation:

man all at blood owing to rechaza all yudanza of autoridad
friday, 04 january 2008

oranjestad (aan): was late in oranan of marduga, one man conocido of police, esta one such b. owing to give tip at police, indicando cu behind one supermercado have one man throw all at blood.

police did take the tip at earnest y owing to dicidi of bay throw one view y enberdad they owing to come across cu he of surname w. cu his cabez cubri cu blood.

according w. cu some choller owing to maltrate, one of the anti-socialnan here is one such “tommy”. the such tommy owing to strike the cu one boter cervez in cabez.

besides the victima owing to tell police, cu the not have have to of yudanza, neither of police y niether servicio of ambulance.

at various ocasion, police owing to ask about y ofrece the compay here all golpia for yude, cada vez the was deny the oferta.

at dado instant on his own forza, w. owing to arise stop on his pianan y owing to march direccion village. patrol owing to follow behind w., for averigua kico is his intencion.

at one cas in village for being exact caya bonaire, past owing to enter one parcela y so also past owing to arrive cas sano y salvo.

all the time police after owing to throw one view in vecindario if acaso they can localiza the such “tommy” but without none result.

* * *


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Dayhiker on January 04, 2008, 09:57:29 AM

AN INVESTIGATION THAT COSTED MILLIONS OF DOLLARS
The investigation has costs millions of dollars, the investigation here with the usage of technologies cellphone conversations and the so called chats, if not for the famous F16's which searched for the possible burial place and the intervention of the Dutch Forensic Institute, Hans Mos says he did not do a calculation of the exact amount, but without including the salaries the investigation of Natalee Holloway costs somewhere between 5 and 10 million dollars.
And this is a dilemma, because although to have been invited to enforce a place in the investigation, you are left with no solution.
"But you have to ask how much is the life of a person worth".

I would guess you're about to find out.

Goodnight monkeys.


10 million dollars is just a drop in the bucket to what Aruba has lost in tourism dollars.

What is your reputation and economy worth in dollars, Aruba?

What is your reputation for integrity, or lack thereof, worth, Holland?

10 million dollars is cheap. It is very clear they haven't spent enough yet.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: LilPuma on January 04, 2008, 10:03:04 AM
i heard Anna was looking for me..

klass. please send her my email address ---pick whatever one you want  :cool: :lol:

unless that is. if she is mad at me, an if she is,tell her you have not seen me

thank you for your cooperation  :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool:

Robots, Letterman was speaking of Robots last night.  You've made the big time. 

Prayers for Tim and the crew of the Persistance. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: LilPuma on January 04, 2008, 10:08:48 AM
It would have cost much less to do the investigation correctly in those first few days than to try to put on a show for an international audience and then try to uncover what that show covered later on.  And Arubans went along with blaming Beth and the U.S. media and even Natalee.  Aruba has made its own bed. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: private eye on January 04, 2008, 10:11:54 AM
This is from the link posted on pg 1. It seems as though the laws have a means to deal with the silence of the boys, unless they are exempt since they were suspects instead of witnesses.

Article 15

124. The Code of Criminal Procedure of the Netherlands Antilles contains (arts. 301-307) rules for the judgment of evidence.


125. Under Netherlands Antillean criminal procedure, not all types of evidence are admissible, since the law exhaustively lists those which are (the judge's own observations, statements made by the suspect, witnesses and experts, and written evidence), while it excludes statements made by fellow suspects and declares uncorroborated statements made by the suspect or a single witness to be insufficient. In Netherlands Antillean criminal case law the doctrine of unlawfully obtained evidence, obtained by a breach of statutory provisions or in a way which conflicts with unwritten procedural law, has been developed. Such evidence may not be used to prove a charge. It is the general opinion both in legal practice and doctrine that the court shall not use or give any weight to evidence illegally obtained. Failure to observe the above regulations leads to the evidence thus acquired being declared inadmissible.


126. Witnesses are in principle obliged to make a statement unless they can invoke a statutory exemption. The obligation is compelling: witnesses at a hearing under oath and, at the request of the suspect or upon application by the Public Prosecution Office, the courts have the power to remand in custody witnesses who without legitimate grounds refuse to answer the questions put to them or to take the oath (or, in the case of non-believers, make the affirmation), provided this is urgently necessary in the interests of the inquiry.


127. The court may order an immediate criminal investigation if a witness is suspected of having committed perjury. In no instance is it permissible to subject witnesses to any coercive measures other than those described above.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: private eye on January 04, 2008, 10:22:01 AM
Article 16

128. The Netherlands Antilles will choose to formulate a separate definition of the offence of torture. Other forms of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment may be deemed to fall within the definitions of existing offences in the Criminal Code. These include articles 248 and 249 (concerning sexual abuse); articles 287 to 299 (concerning crimes against a person's liberty, slavery, kidnapping, assault and battery and unlawful threat, the infliction of bodily injury or causing death).


129. The statements made above with respect to articles 10, 11, 12 and 13 are also applicable to the acts referred to in article 16 of the Convention.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: private eye on January 04, 2008, 10:42:16 AM
It appears at first glance that witnesses can be held until they talk. Whether or not this is correct and what limitations there are I don't know. I realize that this seems to be crimes committed by the state involving brutality and torture, I don't think it is limited to that, and in the course of the discussion, the summary explains Netherland Antilles Law and procedures, I think:) My trouble has been locating anything in English.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: private eye on January 04, 2008, 12:23:01 PM

AN INVESTIGATION THAT COSTED MILLIONS OF DOLLARS
The investigation has costs millions of dollars, the investigation here with the usage of technologies cellphone conversations and the so called chats, if not for the famous F16's which searched for the possible burial place and the intervention of the Dutch Forensic Institute, Hans Mos says he did not do a calculation of the exact amount, but without including the salaries the investigation of Natalee Holloway costs somewhere between 5 and 10 million dollars.
And this is a dilemma, because although to have been invited to enforce a place in the investigation, you are left with no solution.
"But you have to ask how much is the life of a person worth".

I would guess you're about to find out.

Goodnight monkeys.


10 million dollars is just a drop in the bucket to what Aruba has lost in tourism dollars.

What is your reputation and economy worth in dollars, Aruba?

What is your reputation for integrity, or lack thereof, worth, Holland?

10 million dollars is cheap. It is very clear they haven't spent enough yet.



As that other site would be quick to point out, I wish they would please furnish us a detailed cost accounting of their claim. And I would like to point out that it is Aruba's authority, as they have plainly made obvious to the FBI and Beth, to investigate the crime alone, and it was within Aruba's borders that the crime was committed thus their expense to fix, and it is Aruba that advertises itself to the world as the "happy Little Island" that is soooooooo safe in an effort to attract our tourists dollars.

My point is, why are they telling us this? Do they want me to tell them all about MY BILLS, since they would be just as responsible for them as I am for theirs. Do they want to reimburse Dave and Beth and TEQS and Entourage for all of their cost? It is claims like this that illustrate the immaturity of their nation, the callousness of their government, and the ill spirited down right meanness of their citizens. Right, this is another example of just how much they want our tourist business and how important our safety is to them. As a people and a nation, a tourist life is insignificant to them. They have the laws in place, the procedure to handle conflicts of interest, the means to force people to testify, but instead they cloak their actions in secrecy, treat us as if we are complete idiots, and when they find out otherwise, they blatantly flip us the bird and tell us to fock off!!!!!!! Even their judges ignore their own professional code of ethics to finish their "clean up squads" work.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: private eye on January 04, 2008, 12:34:41 PM
And their is the cost of WHAT IT WOULD HAVE TAKEN TO SOLVE THE CASE, MINI,AL VS THE HUGE EXPENSE INVOLVED TO ACCOMPLISH THE COVER UP/INCOMPETENCE.

I just can't believe what comes out of their mouths:))))))))


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Dayhiker on January 04, 2008, 12:43:49 PM

10 million dollars is just a drop in the bucket to what Aruba has lost in tourism dollars.

What is your reputation and economy worth in dollars, Aruba?

What is your reputation for integrity, or lack thereof, worth, Holland?

10 million dollars is cheap. It is very clear they haven't spent enough yet.



As that other site would be quick to point out, I wish they would please furnish us a detailed cost accounting of their claim. And I would like to point out that it is Aruba's authority, as they have plainly made obvious to the FBI and Beth, to investigate the crime alone, and it was within Aruba's borders that the crime was committed thus their expense to fix, and it is Aruba that advertises itself to the world as the "happy Little Island" that is soooooooo safe in an effort to attract our tourists dollars.

My point is, why are they telling us this? Do they want me to tell them all about MY BILLS, since they would be just as responsible for them as I am for theirs. Do they want to reimburse Dave and Beth and TEQS and Entourage for all of their cost? It is claims like this that illustrate the immaturity of their nation, the callousness of their government, and the ill spirited down right meanness of their citizens. Right, this is another example of just how much they want our tourist business and how important our safety is to them. As a people and a nation, a tourist life is insignificant to them. They have the laws in place, the procedure to handle conflicts of interest, the means to force people to testify, but instead they cloak their actions in secrecy, treat us as if we are complete idiots, and when they find out otherwise, they blatantly flip us the bird and tell us to fock off!!!!!!! Even their judges ignore their own professional code of ethics to finish their "clean up squads" work.


 :salut: :salut: :salut: :salut: :salut:

Never once have they apologized to the family of Natalee for all the hurt and pain they have caused. Aruba chose to fight her mother and father tooth and nail from the get-go. AHATA and ATA have tried everything they could to bash Natalee and point the investigation away from the perpetrators. Aruba sent out protesters to bash the family. Aruba chose cover-up over justice and are still riding it today.

Screw that whole entire island. Aruba deserves to have their asses shut down.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 04, 2008, 12:44:01 PM
POSTED: 8:02 am EDT June 5, 2005
UPDATED: 10:16 pm EDT June 5, 2005

SAN NICOLAS, Aruba -- At least 70 people attended a prayer vigil Sunday night in Aruba for missing Alabama teenager Natalee Holloway.

One speaker at the 10-minute ceremony said the so-far unsuccessful search for Holloway is a trying time "for the world as a whole."

Holloway had been visiting the island last week with classmates to celebrate their high school graduation when she disappeared.

A reward of $50,00 is being offered for information leading to her rescue.

Police in Aruba said Sunday that a blood-soaked mattress found on a beach in eastern Aruba over the weekend was not related to the missing girl.


The two men being detained are security guards at the Allegra Hotel, which is near where Holloway was staying, Birmingham television station WVTM reported.

Aruba Attorney General Carin Jansen told reporters gathered at a press conference Sunday that while the arrest of two men was related to the case due to unspecified "tips," she declined to provide further details.

She would not say whether there was a connection between those two men and three others who had previously been questioned in connection with the Mountain Brook teen's disappearance.

Jansen answered most questions from reporters with a terse, "That is part of the investigation, and I can't discuss it."

Several additional details on the search for Holliway did come out during the press conference.

Jansen confirmed that law enforcement officials in Aruba had asked for help from an FBI diving team. She also told reporters that while police had not confiscated clothing or other items that would directly link the two arrested men to Holloway, they had seized other "items of interest to the case."

She also said that the two men arrested were considered "solid leads" in the case.

As for how long the investigation would continue, Jansen said that it would continue "as long as needed. It could be two weeks...three weeks. However long it takes for us to complete the picture."

Following a tip, police also searched the Allegra on Saturday. No sign of Holloway was found during the search, but a further investigation led to the arrest of the two men.


It is not yet clear what charges are being brought against the pair.

Holloway was on a five-day excursion with 124 seniors and several chaperones from Mountain Brook High School, near Birmingham. Holloway was last seen early May 30.

She did not show up for her return flight, and police found her passport in her hotel room with her packed bags.

http://www.wnbc.com/news/4570524/detail.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Helen Back on January 04, 2008, 12:48:41 PM
And their is the cost of WHAT IT WOULD HAVE TAKEN TO SOLVE THE CASE, MINI,AL VS THE HUGE EXPENSE INVOLVED TO ACCOMPLISH THE COVER UP/INCOMPETENCE.

I just can't believe what comes out of their mouths:))))))))

Keep going PI, You're on a ROLL!

We could have gladly shared some of their "expense" and billed it through our FBI.  I believe they offered to help.  :roll: Seems to me that since they excluded any offers of assistance from the FBI and other investigative agencies, they should stop WHINING about the cost.

ARUBA, you can't have it both ways.

 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Dayhiker on January 04, 2008, 12:49:03 PM
And their is the cost of WHAT IT WOULD HAVE TAKEN TO SOLVE THE CASE, MINI,AL VS THE HUGE EXPENSE INVOLVED TO ACCOMPLISH THE COVER UP/INCOMPETENCE.

I just can't believe what comes out of their mouths:))))))))


Aruba has easily lost a half a billion dollars in tourism dollars over the last 30 months. You can't put a price tag on the damage to their image. For what, to protect a handful of their favored Dutchies? To keep the island's dirty date rape drugging a secret? To keep everyone from seeing their huge drug and money laundering operations run by the Mafia casinos? 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 04, 2008, 12:55:09 PM
And their is the cost of WHAT IT WOULD HAVE TAKEN TO SOLVE THE CASE, MINI,AL VS THE HUGE EXPENSE INVOLVED TO ACCOMPLISH THE COVER UP/INCOMPETENCE.

I just can't believe what comes out of their mouths:))))))))


Aruba has easily lost a half a billion dollars in tourism dollars over the last 30 months. You can't put a price tag on the damage to their image. For what, to protect a handful of their favored Dutchies? To keep the island's dirty date rape drugging a secret? To keep everyone from seeing their huge drug and money laundering operations run by the Mafia casinos? 

I'M sure they added all that in there costs when they sued Dr.Phil for 800 million dollars.  :2doh:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Helen Back on January 04, 2008, 01:02:54 PM
And their is the cost of WHAT IT WOULD HAVE TAKEN TO SOLVE THE CASE, MINI,AL VS THE HUGE EXPENSE INVOLVED TO ACCOMPLISH THE COVER UP/INCOMPETENCE.

I just can't believe what comes out of their mouths:))))))))


Aruba has easily lost a half a billion dollars in tourism dollars over the last 30 months. You can't put a price tag on the damage to their image. For what, to protect a handful of their favored Dutchies? To keep the island's dirty date rape drugging a secret? To keep everyone from seeing their huge drug and money laundering operations run by the Mafia casinos? 

Yep.  and in spite of their best efforts at a cover up, it's all coming out anyway.  Bad Strategy!

LOSS, LOSS, and more LOSS. 



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: wreck on January 04, 2008, 01:33:00 PM
And their is the cost of WHAT IT WOULD HAVE TAKEN TO SOLVE THE CASE, MINI,AL VS THE HUGE EXPENSE INVOLVED TO ACCOMPLISH THE COVER UP/INCOMPETENCE.

I just can't believe what comes out of their mouths:))))))))


Aruba has easily lost a half a billion dollars in tourism dollars over the last 30 months. You can't put a price tag on the damage to their image. For what, to protect a handful of their favored Dutchies? To keep the island's dirty date rape drugging a secret? To keep everyone from seeing their huge drug and money laundering operations run by the Mafia casinos? 

Yep.  and in spite of their best efforts at a cover up, it's all coming out anyway.  Bad Strategy!

LOSS, LOSS, and more LOSS. 


I don't know if it is mere stupidity or shear corruptness that Aruba has taken the angle that if the case is "closed" -- they "win." (It is BOTH -- I surmize)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: NM on January 04, 2008, 01:51:13 PM
I happened upon this list of expenses written on a torn up frosted flake box.

ALE Expenses
Purchase of gottenbos house
Purchase of gottenbos insurance company
Purchase of gottenbos seamstress business
Purchase of gottenbos boat
Purchase of gottenbos bus
Relocation cost for gottenbos family to US
Air fare, one way to nl-, guido
Air fare one way Mx- relocate C&C staff/witnesses
Air fare one way Australia (?) - relocate teacher
Air fares round trip to nl- many trips by various vdsluts, Jansen, dumpig
Air fare round trip Barbados-dumpig
Air fare round trip Birmingham-dumpig
Air fare round trip Phila, meet with Franny Rizzo a phila counsilman and police-dompig
Metal institution fees to hid witness
ahata
Frosted flakes-lots, keep 'em coming
Murder- Rene H.
Murder- Ruth D
Charles Croes' cell phone bussiness to monitor Natalee's family members and anyone    wanting to help Natalee
F-16's (three)
Salaries of many aruban blog posters
Spending money for jurin
Re-writing of police statements
Purchase 1 car -guido
Purchase 1 car-deepak
Destruction 1 car-deepak
Puchase 1 car-replace deepak's
Destruction of evidence-huge amounts
White epoxy paint to cover-up DNA on rocks
Salary for staff to paint rocks and removal of evidence
Payment to retract confession-June 11
Purchase Cyberzone café-keep ramirez-kalpoo family happy
Lawyer fees-(jurin-16, dk-4, sk-2, freddy-2, pvds-?)
U.S. Lawyer fees


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Helen Back on January 04, 2008, 01:53:11 PM
And their is the cost of WHAT IT WOULD HAVE TAKEN TO SOLVE THE CASE, MINI,AL VS THE HUGE EXPENSE INVOLVED TO ACCOMPLISH THE COVER UP/INCOMPETENCE.

I just can't believe what comes out of their mouths:))))))))


Aruba has easily lost a half a billion dollars in tourism dollars over the last 30 months. You can't put a price tag on the damage to their image. For what, to protect a handful of their favored Dutchies? To keep the island's dirty date rape drugging a secret? To keep everyone from seeing their huge drug and money laundering operations run by the Mafia casinos? 

Yep.  and in spite of their best efforts at a cover up, it's all coming out anyway.  Bad Strategy!

LOSS, LOSS, and more LOSS. 


I don't know if it is mere stupidity or shear corruptness that Aruba has taken the angle that if the case is "closed" -- they "win." (It is BOTH -- I surmize)

It's hard to believe that the PTB in Aruba do not understand how important it is for them to bring resolution to this case.  Closing it brings not only non-resolution, but the end of hope of resolution.

The only thing keeping this from becoming so much worse for Aruba, was our HOPE that they would bring resolution.  Without that HOPE, I'm feel they have just unleashed a TSUNAMI of bad PR, and continued economic woe.  They have successfully destroyed the brand called "ARUBA". 



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: MumInOhio on January 04, 2008, 02:11:19 PM
I happened upon this list of expenses written on a torn up frosted flake box.

ALE Expenses
Purchase of gottenbos house
Purchase of gottenbos insurance company
Purchase of gottenbos seamstress business
Purchase of gottenbos boat
Purchase of gottenbos bus
Relocation cost for gottenbos family to US
Air fare, one way to nl-, guido
Air fare one way Mx- relocate C&C staff/witnesses
Air fare one way Australia (?) - relocate teacher
Air fares round trip to nl- many trips by various vdsluts, Jansen, dumpig
Air fare round trip Barbados-dumpig
Air fare round trip Birmingham-dumpig
Air fare round trip Phila, meet with Franny Rizzo a phila counsilman and police-dompig
Metal institution fees to hid witness
ahata
Frosted flakes-lots, keep 'em coming
Murder- Rene H.
Murder- Ruth D
Charles Croes' cell phone bussiness to monitor Natalee's family members and anyone    wanting to help Natalee
F-16's (three)
Salaries of many aruban blog posters
Spending money for jurin
Re-writing of police statements
Purchase 1 car -guido
Purchase 1 car-deepak
Destruction 1 car-deepak
Puchase 1 car-replace deepak's
Destruction of evidence-huge amounts
White epoxy paint to cover-up DNA on rocks
Salary for staff to paint rocks and removal of evidence
Payment to retract confession-June 11
Purchase Cyberzone café-keep ramirez-kalpoo family happy
Lawyer fees-(jurin-16, dk-4, sk-2, freddy-2, pvds-?)
U.S. Lawyer fees


 We could take up an entire thread if we listed them all.:lol: :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: NM on January 04, 2008, 02:17:51 PM
Mum,
We might even need a separate blog.
Notice there are no expenses to search for Natalee nor to solve the case!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 04, 2008, 03:15:25 PM
http://nholloway.blogspot.com/2008/01/x-persistence.html

Update:
04-Jan-1557 hrs
The skies are clear and the winds are strong and steady. Wind 25kts gusting 30+. Seas 5-6ft, with the occasional 10ft+ swell. The seas are too rough to run sonar into the seas, so we shift to a different grid with lines running perpendicular to the dominant swells. Working in side-seas produces somewhat cleaner data, but takes a heavy toll on the crew rolling and heaving about inside the boat.

(http://bp2.blogger.com/_d8XtKIwObt4/R36SyODWjOI/AAAAAAAAAK8/L33lGaFN6ok/s400/High_seas.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 04, 2008, 03:16:04 PM
Working and lurking again today  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 04, 2008, 03:19:59 PM
Dr. Andrew Hodges - Where is Natalee Holloway?

Youtube videos

http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=forensicthoughtprint



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 04, 2008, 04:04:22 PM
Short interview with Anita after her husband is arrested. She tells the Interviewer Joran was warning them that PVDS would be picked up.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XJlpM_JCwks


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: oceanexploration on January 04, 2008, 04:17:04 PM
Yes, working and lurking.  It's rough as hell out here.  We're forced to dead-dead into the seas north and run our lines southward downseas.  We'll keep this up for a while and see how goes. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: oceanexploration on January 04, 2008, 04:21:15 PM
correction for a typo... that would be "dead-head", not "dead-dead". Is there a way to correct a reply once it's posted?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 04, 2008, 04:25:58 PM
correction for a typo... that would be "dead-head", not "dead-dead". Is there a way to correct a reply once it's posted?

No,unfortunately not  :-? Hang in there Kyle!! Hopefully the seas calm down  :sad:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Magnolia on January 04, 2008, 04:32:38 PM
Yes, working and lurking.  It's rough as hell out here.  We're forced to dead-dead into the seas north and run our lines southward downseas.  We'll keep this up for a while and see how goes. 

Hope you don't get sea sick.  How long are they predicting
the rough weather to last?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: oceanexploration on January 04, 2008, 04:43:34 PM
How long will the bad weather last?  Until spring.  It's seasonal.  Relatively calm in the summer, perpetually rough in the winter. We've been fortunate this far.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Magnolia on January 04, 2008, 04:44:54 PM
I just looked up Marine Conditions in Aruba.
They are expecting the high winds and seas for the
next five days.
Winds to 35 mph and 7 foot waves.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 04, 2008, 04:47:31 PM
How long will the bad weather last?  Until spring.  It's seasonal.  Relatively calm in the summer, perpetually rough in the winter. We've been fortunate this far.

If there is anything we can do,please don't hesitate to ask. I know you all have planned this for a very long time so I presume most everything is researched. Even so,we are here to help!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Magnolia on January 04, 2008, 04:51:23 PM
Wear your sunscreen!  Those high winds will age you
and you will look like Julia Renfro. :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: texasmom on January 04, 2008, 04:57:12 PM
Yes, working and lurking.  It's rough as hell out here.  We're forced to dead-dead into the seas north and run our lines southward downseas.  We'll keep this up for a while and see how goes. 

Hope the seas calm for you soon, Kyle.  You guys are great, keep up the good work!

PERSISTENCE = HOPE  


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: oceanexploration on January 04, 2008, 05:04:16 PM
Actually, it would be great if the Monkeys et al., could come up with a verifiable timeline for the alleged disposal.  ie: -How long were they gone, how is this known (w/sources) min/max.  Then we can do a little comparison.  That might be a good excercise if interested.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: oceanexploration on January 04, 2008, 05:09:05 PM
I forgot to mention.. please include those discussions in the Ocean Search thread so I don't have to sort through pages of Case Discussion.  ~Thanks.

Aio, quantitas magna frumentorum est


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 04, 2008, 05:10:40 PM
Actually, it would be great if the Monkeys et al., could come up with a verifiable timeline for the alleged disposal.  ie: -How long were they gone, how is this known (w/sources) min/max.  Then we can do a little comparison.  That might be a good excercise if interested.


We can do that Kyle,As you know there are several theories out there,but the first one that comes to mind was that of Natalee's Freebirds..What do you guys think? It's tough task as information about whereabouts and timeliines is sketchy,but lets see what we can come up with.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 04, 2008, 05:11:35 PM
Wear your sunscreen!  Those high winds will age you
and you will look like Julia Renfro. :lol:

 :smt046


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Peaches on January 04, 2008, 05:12:21 PM
I think the Freebirds have certainly thought it all out.  I'm impressed.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 04, 2008, 05:12:55 PM
Actually, it would be great if the Monkeys et al., could come up with a verifiable timeline for the alleged disposal.  ie: -How long were they gone, how is this known (w/sources) min/max.  Then we can do a little comparison.  That might be a good excercise if interested.


We can do that Kyle,As you know there are several theories out there,but the first one that comes to mind was that of Natalee's Freebirds..What do you guys think?

******* - I'm going to let you take charge of this.  I'm working and can't do it right now.  Natalee's Freebirds have the best info if they have what Kyle's looking for.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Kermit on January 04, 2008, 05:16:22 PM
Actually, it would be great if the Monkeys et al., could come up with a verifiable timeline for the alleged disposal.  ie: -How long were they gone, how is this known (w/sources) min/max.  Then we can do a little comparison.  That might be a good excercise if interested.

KYLE THIS WEBSITE HAS A GOOD EXPLAINATION OF WHAT TOOK PLACE AND WHEN AND HOW


IN THE FACE OF EVIL


What was going on between 7:00 pm and 8:30 pm?

We believe this is when Paulus and Joran took Miss Holloway's remains out to sea on the Gottenbos boat. Here Joran sets himself up to be highly visible that night after 8:00 pm .


Part 3 detailed the most likely movements of Paulus van der Sloot during this time, and here now are Joran's activities for this timeframe.

JORAN SAYS TENNIS LESSON ENDED AT 7:00, HE SHOWERED AND THEN CALLED ANDRE ANDRE AGREES TO MEET HIM AT 8:00 AT THE WYNDHAM

Approximately 19.00 pm, I was ready with playing tennis. I showered in the clubhouse. After I had finised showering I got dressed. Then I called "Andre". We had agreed that we would meet at the Wyndham Hotel at approximately 20.00 pm to play poker.
JVDS 6-14

JORAN SAYS HE ALSO CALLS GUIDO AND ASKS HIM TO GO TO THE WYNDHAM GUIDO DECLINES SAYING HE HAS TO WORK, BUT MIGHT COME LATER

Approximately 19.00 pm, I was ready with playing tennis. I had then also called Guido. Guido had told me that he had to go to work. He would come later and try to enter the tournament for half time
JVDS 6-14

According to Paulus, this conversation took place in person, not over the phone. What then was the true nature of this phone call from Joran to Paulus at around 7:00 pm?

Giving confirmation that the boat was at the launch and ready to go?

JORAN SAYS HE THEN CALLED PAULUS TO ASK PERMISSION TO GO TO THE WYNDHAM TO GAMBLE

Approximately 19.00 pm, I was ready with playing tennis. I showered in the clubhouse. After I had finised showering I got dressed. I had also called my father and asked if I could play poker at the Wyndham Casino. My father gave me permission.
JVDS 6-14

Then we have Joran claiming to have been bouncing from one casino to the next for the hour of 7:00 - 8:00 pm



http://nataleesfreebirds.blogspot.com/2007/10/in-face-of-evil-may-30-2005_19.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 04, 2008, 05:16:45 PM
Actually, it would be great if the Monkeys et al., could come up with a verifiable timeline for the alleged disposal.  ie: -How long were they gone, how is this known (w/sources) min/max.  Then we can do a little comparison.  That might be a good excercise if interested.


We can do that Kyle,As you know there are several theories out there,but the first one that comes to mind was that of Natalee's Freebirds..What do you guys think?

******* - I'm going to let you take charge of this.  I'm working and can't do it right now.  Natalee's Freebirds have the best info if they have what Kyle's looking for.

Will do..Very tough task,but I know there are a lot of great researchers here who can help. I'll post the Freebirds theory on the other thread.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Magnolia on January 04, 2008, 05:24:06 PM
Actually, it would be great if the Monkeys et al., could come up with a verifiable timeline for the alleged disposal.  ie: -How long were they gone, how is this known (w/sources) min/max.  Then we can do a little comparison.  That might be a good excercise if interested.


We can do that Kyle,As you know there are several theories out there,but the first one that comes to mind was that of Natalee's Freebirds..What do you guys think?

******* - I'm going to let you take charge of this.  I'm working and can't do it right now.  Natalee's Freebirds have the best info if they have what Kyle's looking for.

Will do..Very tough task,but I know there are a lot of great researchers here who can help. I'll post the Freebirds theory on the other thread.

The most sensible scenerio that I have seen was the Freebirds theory
that they took Koen's Sea Pro boat out from the public marina near
the Marriott on the evening of May 31st prior to 8:00PM


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 04, 2008, 05:29:17 PM
Thx guys and I agree,Hard to come up with facts and timelines about a sea disposal but the Freebird Theory comes to mind first. If anyone can find anything please post it!!

If you are reading this blog and may know something now is the time to relieve your conscious. You can post your thoughts/info on the Front Page and be totally anonymous. Koen and Sander,this is never going to end until Natalee is found!


I see Kermit already did it..Thanks! :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Magnolia on January 04, 2008, 05:45:37 PM
What time was the "ping" from the cell phone that night from
out in the water?
Where's Janet? 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Buckeye on January 04, 2008, 07:00:02 PM
From Jane at BFN

01/03/2008 at 08:30 am in Department 69, Edward A. Ferns, Presiding. Motion to Dismiss (Motion for Stay of Order; Motion for Substitution of Personal Representative for Deceased Deft.; Case Management Conference; OSC RE: Plaintiffs' Failure to Appear on 12-7-07) - Not Held-Continued

Future Hearings:

02/05/2008 at 08:30 am in department 69 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
(1) Motion Pro Hac Vice (Introduction of new Plaintiff Attorney)
(2) Motion to Dismiss (by Defense)
(3) Motion for Substitution of of Personal Representative for Deceased Defendant (replace Skeeters estate for Skeeters)
(4) Motion for Stay of Orders (Plaintiffs attempting to reverse Order to Compel)
(5) Case Management Conference
(6) OSC RE Failure to Appear on 12/7/07

02/29/2008 at 08:30 am in department 69 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012. Motion to Compel ((2))


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 04, 2008, 07:03:59 PM
Kyle,

That Freebirds theory is the only thing I see at the moment. Because we aren't privy to the dossier much of everything is speculation and rumor or psychics. What we did see in the few PV'S much of it they lied about. There has been very little talk about a boat being used and who may have been involved in disposing of Natalee that can be considered fact. I'M sure TJ Ward,Dave Holloway and Bo Dietl have better info compared to what is on the internet.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: dennisintn on January 04, 2008, 07:30:42 PM
Kyle,

That Freebirds theory is the only thing I see at the moment. Because we aren't privy to the dossier much of everything is speculation and rumor or psychics. What we did see in the few PV'S much of it they lied about. There has been very little talk about a boat being used and who may have been involved in disposing of Natalee that can be considered fact. I'M sure TJ Ward,Dave Holloway and Bo Dietl have better info compared to what is on the internet.



is it worth a chance to talk to mos about their timeline for jvds that night.  they definitely have a better chance of verifying times and alibis and might be willing to share that information with persistence.  this is a different set of people you'd be dealing with and i really think mos would be willing to help in any way he could, particularly if he could do it without having to pay for it with media attention and static from the defense lawyers.  man to man always works best, in my experience.
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 04, 2008, 07:43:19 PM
Kyle,

That Freebirds theory is the only thing I see at the moment. Because we aren't privy to the dossier much of everything is speculation and rumor or psychics. What we did see in the few PV'S much of it they lied about. There has been very little talk about a boat being used and who may have been involved in disposing of Natalee that can be considered fact. I'M sure TJ Ward,Dave Holloway and Bo Dietl have better info compared to what is on the internet.



is it worth a chance to talk to mos about their timeline for jvds that night.  they definitely have a better chance of verifying times and alibis and might be willing to share that information with persistence.  this is a different set of people you'd be dealing with and i really think mos would be willing to help in any way he could, particularly if he could do it without having to pay for it with media attention and static from the defense lawyers.  man to man always works best, in my experience.
dennisintn

Why doesn't someone just ask Jossy for some of this info...Mos would need to explain how he knew Natalee was in the ocean...just as how would van der Straaten know Natalee was dead.  The PTB will not help...they can't without incriminating their favorite sons.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: AZSunny on January 04, 2008, 08:16:56 PM
Kyle,

That Freebirds theory is the only thing I see at the moment. Because we aren't privy to the dossier much of everything is speculation and rumor or psychics. What we did see in the few PV'S much of it they lied about. There has been very little talk about a boat being used and who may have been involved in disposing of Natalee that can be considered fact. I'M sure TJ Ward,Dave Holloway and Bo Dietl have better info compared to what is on the internet.



is it worth a chance to talk to mos about their timeline for jvds that night.  they definitely have a better chance of verifying times and alibis and might be willing to share that information with persistence.  this is a different set of people you'd be dealing with and i really think mos would be willing to help in any way he could, particularly if he could do it without having to pay for it with media attention and static from the defense lawyers.  man to man always works best, in my experience.
dennisintn

Why doesn't someone just ask Jossy for some of this info...Mos would need to explain how he knew Natalee was in the ocean...just as how would van der Straaten know Natalee was dead.  The PTB will not help...they can't without incriminating their favorite sons.

Lala is right!  Jossy has great time lines I think.  Have Tim ask Jossy, if that is not a comfortable conversation for you, Kyle!  You are in our prayers! 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Altruist on January 04, 2008, 08:21:19 PM
From Jane at BFN

01/03/2008 at 08:30 am in Department 69, Edward A. Ferns, Presiding. Motion to Dismiss (Motion for Stay of Order; Motion for Substitution of Personal Representative for Deceased Deft.; Case Management Conference; OSC RE: Plaintiffs' Failure to Appear on 12-7-07) - Not Held-Continued

Future Hearings:

02/05/2008 at 08:30 am in department 69 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
(1) Motion Pro Hac Vice (Introduction of new Plaintiff Attorney)
(2) Motion to Dismiss (by Defense)
(3) Motion for Substitution of of Personal Representative for Deceased Defendant (replace Skeeters estate for Skeeters)
(4) Motion for Stay of Orders (Plaintiffs attempting to reverse Order to Compel)
(5) Case Management Conference
(6) OSC RE Failure to Appear on 12/7/07

02/29/2008 at 08:30 am in department 69 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012. Motion to Compel ((2))

B.1     Pro Hac Vice a procedure necessary when an attorney is not an admitted member bar of the state of jurisdiction.  So this is either a Taco Bell type or an out of country type, that is if the state of California entertains attorneys from other countries.  So it looks like the "plaintiffs" are seeking to add an additional member to their "legal team" AKA agents of misdirection.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: AZSunny on January 04, 2008, 08:25:34 PM
Pro Hac sort of sums it up, doesn't it?   :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 04, 2008, 08:28:27 PM
I was just thinking of Jan VDS,He knows exactly what happened to Natalee and where they buried her.No way would he help frame innocent people,break laws and risk his own neck if he didn't know what his friends the Van Der Sloots did with her.MO He was guiding people in the opposite direction. Problem is that he is very close friends of PVDS and will never tell. The only way he would ever tell is if they offered him a deal to avoid being in fricken prison where he belongs. We know Aruba doesnt make deals nor have they made any attempt of exposing any part of the cover up.

They could do this all anonymously,but they are basterds and its still in the Aruban Govts/AHATA'S best interest that she is never found. 31 Months in the ocean,I doubt there will be any forensic evidence unless she was shot,major head injury or they dumped evidence alongside of her. It's obvious they dont want to prosecute anyone or reveal the truth,but a anonymous tip where her remains could be found would do everyone a lot of good. But then again,this was a neandrathol investigation and they keep saying they cant prosecute without a body. If she is found we will all expect a trial and thats the last thing the Aruba wants.IMO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 04, 2008, 08:35:29 PM

B.1     Pro Hac Vice a procedure necessary when an attorney is not an admitted member bar of the state of jurisdiction.  So this is either a Taco Bell type or an out of country type, that is if the state of California entertains attorneys from other countries.  So it looks like the "plaintiffs" are seeking to add an additional member to their "legal team" AKA agents of misdirection.

Could be another attorney from that same law firm in Chicago right? I wonder if they produced anymore documents like Judge Nit Wits letter said they would?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 04, 2008, 08:47:18 PM
I was just thinking of Jan VDS,He knows exactly what happened to Natalee and where they buried her.No way would he help frame innocent people,break laws and risk his own neck if he didn't know what his friends the Van Der Sloots did with her.MO He was guiding people in the opposite direction. Problem is that he is very close friends of PVDS and will never tell. The only way he would ever tell is if they offered him a deal to avoid being in fricken prison where he belongs. We know Aruba doesnt make deals nor have they made any attempt of exposing any part of the cover up.

They could do this all anonymously,but they are basterds and its still in the Aruban Govts/AHATA'S best interest that she is never found. 31 Months in the ocean,I doubt there will be any forensic evidence unless she was shot,major head injury or they dumped evidence alongside of her. It's obvious they dont want to prosecute anyone or reveal the truth,but a anonymous tip where her remains could be found would do everyone a lot of good. But then again,this was a neandrathol investigation and they keep saying they cant prosecute without a body. If she is found we will all expect a trial and thats the last thing the Aruba wants.IMO

My point exactly. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 04, 2008, 08:56:52 PM
Have we ever made any connections between the PTB on Aruba and the North Korean arms thing that Beth mentioned in her book? 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Kat_Gram on January 04, 2008, 09:05:26 PM
I don't agree with the timeline of the Freebirds.
Why:
a.) Deepak was at work until about what ? Eleven ? that Monday night.
b.) It was still light outside that time of the evening.
Deepak met Joran at the Casino and there was something very hincky about the time line later that night. There was some missing time. If there was nothing to lie about later that evening, why lie ?  Andre Dos Santos' PV seemed about the most reliable and open as I don't believe he was under any influence to not tell the truth, he was just a bystander that Monday night.The truth could have been told and it could have been backed up by the witnesses he had who saw him in the casino.
For that reason, I think that the boat was launched later and it was done around the same time Beth was arriving.   
..ps I also don't buy the fish trap thing. That happened the Sunday and I just don't believe they were that organized up at that point. Some other container,
weighted down.The radar in Aruba, it is upgraded now, but it wasn't then. If a small boat went out just past the sandbar, why would it be an event worth noting at the time ? How long would it take in a SpeedPro to go and come back ? Ten minutes. Joran was moving between casinos for a reason.   


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 04, 2008, 09:10:45 PM
Have we ever made any connections between the PTB on Aruba and the North Korean arms thing that Beth mentioned in her book? 
That sounds like a tough task to expose. I wonder if that is why the FBI and our Govt are so quiet? If they are aware that Aruba is involved in dealings with N.Korea and Covering up Natalee's murder what are they waiting on?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 04, 2008, 09:10:56 PM
Have we ever made any connections between the PTB on Aruba and the North Korean arms thing that Beth mentioned in her book? 

There was an article - or some kind of meeting I believe in 2005 where Oduber and North Korea was present.  I don't remember exactly what the meeting was now but I remember we discussed it at the time. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Kat_Gram on January 04, 2008, 09:13:05 PM
Ok, I can't turn the TV on because of Ms. Spears. I might become nauseated, so I rented some films, Munich and the Curse of Golden Flower ( subtitles ! !  )


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 04, 2008, 09:35:15 PM
Have we ever made any connections between the PTB on Aruba and the North Korean arms thing that Beth mentioned in her book? 
That sounds like a tough task to expose. I wonder if that is why the FBI and our Govt are so quiet? If they are aware that Aruba is involved in dealings with N.Korea and Covering up Natalee's murder what are they waiting on?

Well, to me a nuclear arms dealer would be more threatening than a mafia boss.  Both are dangerous, but I tend to think the North Koreans would operate on a take no prisoners basis when dealing with small fish on Aruba.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 04, 2008, 09:41:40 PM
Have we ever made any connections between the PTB on Aruba and the North Korean arms thing that Beth mentioned in her book? 

There was an article - or some kind of meeting I believe in 2005 where Oduber and North Korea was present.  I don't remember exactly what the meeting was now but I remember we discussed it at the time. 

I must have missed it...what were Oduber and North Korea discussing, do you remember?  Makes sense to me that Chavez would certainly be interested in meeting this NK dude too.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Magnolia on January 04, 2008, 09:46:00 PM
Have we ever made any connections between the PTB on Aruba and the North Korean arms thing that Beth mentioned in her book? 
That sounds like a tough task to expose. I wonder if that is why the FBI and our Govt are so quiet? If they are aware that Aruba is involved in dealings with N.Korea and Covering up Natalee's murder what are they waiting on?

Well, to me a nuclear arms dealer would be more threatening than a mafia boss.  Both are dangerous, but I tend to think the North Koreans would operate on a take no prisoners basis when dealing with small fish on Aruba.

Somebody smarter than I am needs to research this.
MTR Gaming Group owns a large share of the Mid Pacific Bank
on Aruba.  Mid Pacific Bank does a large share of business
with the bank in Maucau where the US froze the assets of
North Korea to get North Korea to shut down their neculear plants.
I bet there is a Posner connection.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 04, 2008, 09:48:13 PM
OK, just a thought...don't anyone throw anything at me....what if you could deal drugs and arms at the same time?  No one would bother you, because they would know you are untouchable...untouchable... I didn't say it...I just thought it. :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: wreck on January 04, 2008, 09:50:49 PM
I first was made aware of the North Korean Arms theory from Rob (where the hell is he anyways? -- I know some here despise him for some reason).
I STILL think there is some merit to this (or something equally as big) involving International Diplomacy/Security that is keeping the U.S. Government from making a big splash in Aruba just yet.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 04, 2008, 09:54:54 PM
Have we ever made any connections between the PTB on Aruba and the North Korean arms thing that Beth mentioned in her book? 

There was an article - or some kind of meeting I believe in 2005 where Oduber and North Korea was present.  I don't remember exactly what the meeting was now but I remember we discussed it at the time. 

I must have missed it...what were Oduber and North Korea discussing, do you remember?  Makes sense to me that Chavez would certainly be interested in meeting this NK dude too.

Lala's, Chavez was at the meeting and so was North Korea - the meeting was in China or someplace.  We were just saying how it figures Oduber would be there.  This was early in the case.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 04, 2008, 09:55:15 PM
I left a msg to Rob Yesterday and he never got back to me. I called because others said he is MIA :(


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Kat_Gram on January 04, 2008, 09:57:35 PM
Does any one else think she was taken to sea on the Monday night ?
And not in a cage ?
What time was that phone call from PVDS to Joran where there was the mix up as to where he was ? I think they were just getting back in from the water.
Where do the Gottenbos usually launch their boat from ? A SeaPro doesn't have to be launched from a marina ? Just a deserted beach where the water is shallow.  Walk in walk out.
I am not fixated on this, but Kyle has asked the question for a reason. Time, tides, weather conditons could be different from 7 to 8 pm / and much later, say 2 am. I would not like if just one reasonabe ( Freebirds ) theory was presented to Kyle.
And by the way, I did Google Kyle and he has an amazing CV.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 04, 2008, 09:57:37 PM
Kat:

I agree,I believe Natalee was reburied and put into the ocean after Natalee's Family arrived. I can count at least three different people that claim she was buried on the island. Chances are at least one of them told the truth. I believe Dompig is being honest when he is giving his theory that Natalee may have been moved around at least twice.

Dompig speculates the body was hastily buried once, and that those extra accomplices may have been needed to move it to a more hidden location.

Authorities Believe Holloway’s Body is on the Island; They Suspect It Was Moved to Avoid Detection and Then Re-buried

Dompig tells correspondent Troy Roberts that investigators believe Holloway’s body is on the island, but suspect it was moved to avoid detection and then re-buried.

“He [the witness] wanted to talk about the fact that he knew more about the whereabouts of Natalee….concerning a specific burial location…. The information that this person gave was too specific to just be a story that was just made up by someone.” Dompig (CBS)
------------------------------------------------
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub2/cartoonnatalee.jpg)
(http://i198.photobucket.com/albums/aa118/Observer00000007/shallowgrave.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: oceanexploration on January 04, 2008, 09:58:40 PM
I was just curious what people managed to ferret via the web about the alleged disposal. I find it fascinating how resourceful and imaginative people can be.  I suppose it beats playing windows solitare, or watching night time drama on TBS. Hopefully, when this is over we'll see who was right on the mark and who missed it completely.  Personally, I've always been a fan of Occam's Razor, but I won't comment on whether or not I feel it applies in this case.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Kat_Gram on January 04, 2008, 10:00:30 PM
Oh well, if North Korea is important, I 'll go and watch CNN and their Britteny Spears extravaganza.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: robots on January 04, 2008, 10:02:08 PM
 :-x


if she was in the water, there would be massive pledge to stop it



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: wreck on January 04, 2008, 10:09:10 PM
:-x


if she was in the water, there would be massive pledge to stop it


There is/was. Joran's attorney filed a motion to disallow any evidence found by The Persistence even before it set sail!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 04, 2008, 10:13:31 PM
I first was made aware of the North Korean Arms theory from Rob (where the hell is he anyways? -- I know some here despise him for some reason).
I STILL think there is some merit to this (or something equally as big) involving International Diplomacy/Security that is keeping the U.S. Government from making a big splash in Aruba just yet.

Yes, there is a reason and I am certain that is a part of it...there are those on Aruba that have connections that are not just with drugs...I have been giving this a lot of thought lately.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 04, 2008, 10:13:52 PM
I was just curious what people managed to ferret via the web about the alleged disposal. I find it fascinating how resourceful and imaginative people can be.  I suppose it beats playing windows solitare, or watching night time drama on TBS. Hopefully, when this is over we'll see who was right on the mark and who missed it completely.  Personally, I've always been a fan of Occam's Razor, but I won't comment on whether or not I feel it applies in this case.

I could provide you with pages of alleged disposals about Natalee on land. However its not going to help you in your search in the ocean. One guy says he buried her in a shallow grave with 2 others,another says he saw all the perps bury her at the landfill,another claims he has vital info about the dunes. None of it panned out because she was probably moved or it was wrong info.IMO

Tim will tell you about that shallow grave that was found in the park,I know he stated that he thought something was buried in it just previously to them finding it.

(http://i198.photobucket.com/albums/aa118/Observer00000007/captaru10307132005arubabj8_th.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: yapperz1 on January 04, 2008, 10:16:41 PM
I first was made aware of the North Korean Arms theory from Rob (where the hell is he anyways? -- I know some here despise him for some reason).
I STILL think there is some merit to this (or something equally as big) involving International Diplomacy/Security that is keeping the U.S. Government from making a big splash in Aruba just yet.

Yes, there is a reason and I am certain that is a part of it...there are those on Aruba that have connections that are not just with drugs...I have been giving this a lot of thought lately.

Hiya Monkeys

Lalas are you thinking about the guy on Aruba who's name seems to stir up a tizzy here?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: robots on January 04, 2008, 10:17:53 PM
:-x


if she was in the water, there would be massive pledge to stop it


There is/was. Joran's attorney filed a motion to disallow any evidence found by The Persistence even before it set sail!!!

hmmm.. yes i remember that
and i know what you mean
but there would be more bitching from law enforcement folks


i think  :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 04, 2008, 10:21:41 PM
Have we ever made any connections between the PTB on Aruba and the North Korean arms thing that Beth mentioned in her book? 
That sounds like a tough task to expose. I wonder if that is why the FBI and our Govt are so quiet? If they are aware that Aruba is involved in dealings with N.Korea and Covering up Natalee's murder what are they waiting on?

Well, to me a nuclear arms dealer would be more threatening than a mafia boss.  Both are dangerous, but I tend to think the North Koreans would operate on a take no prisoners basis when dealing with small fish on Aruba.

Somebody smarter than I am needs to research this.
MTR Gaming Group owns a large share of the Mid Pacific Bank
on Aruba.  Mid Pacific Bank does a large share of business
with the bank in Maucau where the US froze the assets of
North Korea to get North Korea to shut down their neculear plants.
I bet there is a Posner connection.

I knew someone would be able to help me..I don't do research too well though.  I never know where to start.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 04, 2008, 10:23:05 PM
I was just curious what people managed to ferret via the web about the alleged disposal. I find it fascinating how resourceful and imaginative people can be.  I suppose it beats playing windows solitare, or watching night time drama on TBS. Hopefully, when this is over we'll see who was right on the mark and who missed it completely.  Personally, I've always been a fan of Occam's Razor, but I won't comment on whether or not I feel it applies in this case.

Shango Says: June 26th, 2005 at 5:48 pm
The simplicity of Occams Razor is often outweighed by the complexity of maintaining factors in an elemental state


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 04, 2008, 10:25:57 PM
I first was made aware of the North Korean Arms theory from Rob (where the hell is he anyways? -- I know some here despise him for some reason).
I STILL think there is some merit to this (or something equally as big) involving International Diplomacy/Security that is keeping the U.S. Government from making a big splash in Aruba just yet.

Yes, there is a reason and I am certain that is a part of it...there are those on Aruba that have connections that are not just with drugs...I have been giving this a lot of thought lately.

Hiya Monkeys

Lalas are you thinking about the guy on Aruba who's name seems to stir up a tizzy here?


Well, yes. Very isolated...no one speaks of him...he's known as a crazy person...he deals drugs...lives high and has parties.  It's not that large a leap from drug dealing to arms dealing. Would you not need to launder arms money as well as drug money? MOO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 04, 2008, 10:32:43 PM
Robots - can you email me when you get a chance?  I can't find your email addy  :wink:

smklaas@hotmail.com


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 04, 2008, 10:35:07 PM
Robots - can you email me when you get a chance?  I can't find your email addy  :wink:

smklaas@hotmail.com

Uh oh!  You're going to the principals office now.    :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: robots on January 04, 2008, 10:36:44 PM
Robots - can you email me when you get a chance?  I can't find your email addy  :wink:

smklaas@hotmail.com

Uh oh!  You're going to the principals office now.    :roll:
:shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Tylergal on January 04, 2008, 10:38:19 PM
OK, just a thought...don't anyone throw anything at me....what if you could deal drugs and arms at the same time?  No one would bother you, because they would know you are untouchable...untouchable... I didn't say it...I just thought it. :roll:

Most arms dealers are also in the pharmacy business and have laundromats.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: crazybabyborg on January 04, 2008, 10:38:37 PM
OT/SORRY!

Yapperz? Took me a LONG time to find the perfect Valentine Avi for you, but, by dingy, I think I've found it!  :wink:

(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/Valentine%20Avatar/vyp.gif)

 :lol: :lol: :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: yapperz1 on January 04, 2008, 10:41:09 PM
OT/SORRY!

Yapperz? Took me a LONG time to find the perfect Valentine Avi for you, but, by dingy, I think I've found it!  :wink:

(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/Valentine%20Avatar/vyp.gif)

 :lol: :lol: :lol:

ROFLMAO I love it CBB. My kissin cow is ready for Valentines Day!!! TYVM


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 04, 2008, 10:43:08 PM
OK, just a thought...don't anyone throw anything at me....what if you could deal drugs and arms at the same time?  No one would bother you, because they would know you are untouchable...untouchable... I didn't say it...I just thought it. :roll:

Most arms dealers are also in the pharmacy business and have laundromats.

Don't you think an arms dealer and an island that is in bed with the North Koreans could be more of a threat to keep your mouth shut than the gambling part of the mafia?  I think so...we all know about Posner and his gambling...no reason to be a threat to anyone.  But...if you provide services to the high rollers with lots of money to spend....that is another thing all together.  Not that it has any connections to Natalee's disappearance...just that you might keep your mouth shut and let things go in order to maintain the status quo.  I guess I am not making any sense at all.  :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 04, 2008, 10:43:48 PM
Kat:

I agree,I believe Natalee was reburied and put into the ocean after Natalee's Family arrived. I can count at least three different people that claim she was buried on the island. Chances are at least one of them told the truth. I believe Dompig is being honest when he is giving his theory that Natalee may have been moved around at least twice.

Dompig speculates the body was hastily buried once, and that those extra accomplices may have been needed to move it to a more hidden location.

Authorities Believe Holloway’s Body is on the Island; They Suspect It Was Moved to Avoid Detection and Then Re-buried

Dompig tells correspondent Troy Roberts that investigators believe Holloway’s body is on the island, but suspect it was moved to avoid detection and then re-buried.

“He [the witness] wanted to talk about the fact that he knew more about the whereabouts of Natalee….concerning a specific burial location…. The information that this person gave was too specific to just be a story that was just made up by someone.” Dompig (CBS)
------------------------------------------------
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub2/cartoonnatalee.jpg)
(http://i198.photobucket.com/albums/aa118/Observer00000007/shallowgrave.jpg)


The cartoon was published, iirc, on 6/5/05...we never did find out if the artist had inside information.  Within 4 days he draws & publishes a cartoon that has the shallow grave & other supposed clues...

Occams razor....outweighed by complexity of maintaining factors in an elementary state.   Guess it is hard to keep it simple.   :2doh:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: crazybabyborg on January 04, 2008, 10:55:16 PM
We all have theories, and mine have changed over time. I used to be absolutely sure she had been placed in the landfill. About the time they located the kiddie pool mentioned by Jossy's witness, I was just sure.

I'm not so sure anymore, and between the crab trap being missing and the suspects being seen near where the trap was stolen, I think the chances she is in the ocean, are good. Was she buried hastily awaiting the opportunity for a sea disposal? Possibly. I'm sure Papa Sloot was involved in the ultimate disposal, and he's not nearly as Big Mouthed as his son.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: texasmom on January 04, 2008, 10:55:32 PM
oceanexploration:

I'm searching for theories of the disposal and will post links (or other info) as I find them.  I'm sure you probably already know about this one but I'm posting it just in case.  I'd looked for a while earlier today but had the same opinion as ******* concerning most of the information I found.

Hodges theory:
http://forensicthoughtprints.com/natalee-holloway-watery-grave.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: MuffyBee on January 04, 2008, 10:56:11 PM
I left a msg to Rob Yesterday and he never got back to me. I called because others said he is MIA :(
OT
I ran across Rob on another forum about a week and a half ago.  He waved when I signaled  and then was gone. Anyone check his website?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: texasmom on January 04, 2008, 11:00:17 PM
Klaasend or ******* (or any one else that can)

If you want to move my last post to the ocean search thread, it's fine with me, I meant to post it there :oops:  thanks!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 04, 2008, 11:02:53 PM
I left a msg to Rob Yesterday and he never got back to me. I called because others said he is MIA :(
OT
I ran across Rob on another forum about a week and a half ago.  He waved when I signaled  and then was gone. Anyone check his website?

On new years eve he put loving natalee episode#63 up..The music is pretty funky,,Rick James?  :P

http://zoltanzion.blogspot.com/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: dennisintn on January 04, 2008, 11:20:14 PM
Robots - can you email me when you get a chance?  I can't find your email addy  :wink:

smklaas@hotmail.com

Uh oh!  You're going to the principals office now.    :roll:
this is probably something that's going on his permanent record.  downright ominous sounding.
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: robots on January 04, 2008, 11:25:21 PM
Robots - can you email me when you get a chance?  I can't find your email addy  :wink:

smklaas@hotmail.com

Uh oh!  You're going to the principals office now.    :roll:
this is probably something that's going on his permanent record.  downright ominous sounding.
dennisintn

lol,

im in trouble all the time - everywhere i go it seems  :cool:

you know for years i have been telling people

"jimmy crack corn and i dont care"

nobody tells me what to do, i have a brain and i will use it..

but it does seem to aggitate a few folks.... like my parents  :cool: :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 04, 2008, 11:26:56 PM
I wonder where Harry Ho heard that from? All I saw was the Vigilante newspaper from Curacao that said Steve Croes may have been involved in breaking into the huts the night Natalee dissapeared.

Also, let us not forget that Deepak communicated regularly with Steve Croes. Steve Croes was seen breaking into the Fisherman's Huts on the night of Natalee's disappearance. And, for no reason, Steve Croes agreed to lie about the Holiday Inn drop-off. Steve Croes has access to a motorized, inflatable Zodiac (inflatable boat), tied up at the Marriott pier.

http://www.hyscience.com/archives/2005/09/harrytho_tuesda_1.php



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 04, 2008, 11:34:36 PM
This Harry Ho is a idiot,but this part of commentary is interesting. Would be nice to see Jug come back on SM Radio. I would like to hear his thoughts on Karen Janssen.
------------------------------------------
Jug Twitty commented on the recent meeting between Dave Holloway and Karin Janssen, and he enlightened Greta as to why he is so upset with Karin Janssen, the prosecutor. This interview, despite its default into the typical Twitty-Holloway response, provided some insights never before discussed. First, Jug stated that he felt that there was nothing satisfying that emerged from Dave's four-hour meeting with Janssen. Greta then queried Jug over his dissatisfaction with Janssen. Jug revisited a heated discussion with Janssen on 28 August, the last time Janssen spoke with Beth or Jug. Jug commenced with a disagreement with Janssen over the issue of whether or not that blood was discovered in the suspects' car. Jug insisted that the FBI stated that there was blood in the car. Janssen retorted that the alleged blood was in fact cleaning fluid. Jug vehemently disagreed with Janssen. Second, Jug spoke of three American witnesses who overheard implicating statements made by the suspects: Joran and Deepak. These statements, Jug says, were ignored by the Aruban investigators. According to Jug, Janssen told them to get sworn statements from these witnesses in the USA. Jug said they got a federal judge to take the statements; however, Janssen refuses to return calls to Jug and Beth concerning what to do with these statements.

Now comes the fun part. Jug was stunned when Janssen revealed family problems with Natalee. Jenssen questioned the $1 Million life insurance policy taken out on Natalee. Further contestation led to queries by Jenssen about Jug's brother's money laundering activities. At this point, Jug admitted that he is high strung. However, he feels that Jenssen is either hiding or has no backbone.

Jug takes a few breaths, then continues with the statement that Jenssen will not admit that she erred when releasing the three suspects. He ridicules her response that they were trying to catch the three red-handed exposing the crime. Jug chuckles that their entire, nine-day, surveillance effort of the three suspect produced absolutely nothing.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2500.new#new


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Pita on January 04, 2008, 11:38:46 PM
Update: 05-Jan- 0025 hrs

The wind and seas have not let up at all throughout day and night. Working in the rough conditions is taking its toll on some of the crew. Regardless, spirits and hope remain high as we push onwards. Working in side-seas proved unrealistic. The last resort is to dead-head straight into the seas without recording and acquire data with the swells moving with the vessel. Although time consuming, at least production is maintained even though it is at half the rate.

Many have confused adventure with inconvenience, trading the provocative for status quo. I believe exploration both in terms of our surroundings and within ourselves is the essence of human spirit. When denied, we're left feeling isolated and unknown. When we have the courage to search these depths, we learn the most about who we are and hopefully a thing or two about each other and our surroundings.

http://www.nholloway.blogspot.com/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 04, 2008, 11:40:41 PM
This Harry Ho is a idiot,but this part of commentary is interesting. Would be nice to see Jug come back on SM Radio. I would like to hear his thoughts on Karen Janssen.
------------------------------------------
Jug Twitty commented on the recent meeting between Dave Holloway and Karin Janssen, and he enlightened Greta as to why he is so upset with Karin Janssen, the prosecutor. This interview, despite its default into the typical Twitty-Holloway response, provided some insights never before discussed. First, Jug stated that he felt that there was nothing satisfying that emerged from Dave's four-hour meeting with Janssen. Greta then queried Jug over his dissatisfaction with Janssen. Jug revisited a heated discussion with Janssen on 28 August, the last time Janssen spoke with Beth or Jug. Jug commenced with a disagreement with Janssen over the issue of whether or not that blood was discovered in the suspects' car. Jug insisted that the FBI stated that there was blood in the car. Janssen retorted that the alleged blood was in fact cleaning fluid. Jug vehemently disagreed with Janssen. Second, Jug spoke of three American witnesses who overheard implicating statements made by the suspects: Joran and Deepak. These statements, Jug says, were ignored by the Aruban investigators. According to Jug, Janssen told them to get sworn statements from these witnesses in the USA. Jug said they got a federal judge to take the statements; however, Janssen refuses to return calls to Jug and Beth concerning what to do with these statements.

Now comes the fun part. Jug was stunned when Janssen revealed family problems with Natalee. Jenssen questioned the $1 Million life insurance policy taken out on Natalee. Further contestation led to queries by Jenssen about Jug's brother's money laundering activities. At this point, Jug admitted that he is high strung. However, he feels that Jenssen is either hiding or has no backbone.

Jug takes a few breaths, then continues with the statement that Jenssen will not admit that she erred when releasing the three suspects. He ridicules her response that they were trying to catch the three red-handed exposing the crime. Jug chuckles that their entire, nine-day, surveillance effort of the three suspect produced absolutely nothing.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2500.new#new


American witnesses? 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 04, 2008, 11:50:33 PM
This Harry Ho is a idiot,but this part of commentary is interesting. Would be nice to see Jug come back on SM Radio. I would like to hear his thoughts on Karen Janssen.
------------------------------------------
Jug Twitty commented on the recent meeting between Dave Holloway and Karin Janssen, and he enlightened Greta as to why he is so upset with Karin Janssen, the prosecutor. This interview, despite its default into the typical Twitty-Holloway response, provided some insights never before discussed. First, Jug stated that he felt that there was nothing satisfying that emerged from Dave's four-hour meeting with Janssen. Greta then queried Jug over his dissatisfaction with Janssen. Jug revisited a heated discussion with Janssen on 28 August, the last time Janssen spoke with Beth or Jug. Jug commenced with a disagreement with Janssen over the issue of whether or not that blood was discovered in the suspects' car. Jug insisted that the FBI stated that there was blood in the car. Janssen retorted that the alleged blood was in fact cleaning fluid. Jug vehemently disagreed with Janssen. Second, Jug spoke of three American witnesses who overheard implicating statements made by the suspects: Joran and Deepak. These statements, Jug says, were ignored by the Aruban investigators. According to Jug, Janssen told them to get sworn statements from these witnesses in the USA. Jug said they got a federal judge to take the statements; however, Janssen refuses to return calls to Jug and Beth concerning what to do with these statements.

Now comes the fun part. Jug was stunned when Janssen revealed family problems with Natalee. Jenssen questioned the $1 Million life insurance policy taken out on Natalee. Further contestation led to queries by Jenssen about Jug's brother's money laundering activities. At this point, Jug admitted that he is high strung. However, he feels that Jenssen is either hiding or has no backbone.

Jug takes a few breaths, then continues with the statement that Jenssen will not admit that she erred when releasing the three suspects. He ridicules her response that they were trying to catch the three red-handed exposing the crime. Jug chuckles that their entire, nine-day, surveillance effort of the three suspect produced absolutely nothing.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2500.new#new


American witnesses? 

The night/early morning the family & entourage arrived...I'm thinking it was someone with them when they were at the VDS home...jmo


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 04, 2008, 11:52:38 PM
Yes, you are right. Thanks.  I am glad you finally got out of the bathroom...too bad you are now assigned to laundry.  :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Tylergal on January 04, 2008, 11:59:30 PM
OK, just a thought...don't anyone throw anything at me....what if you could deal drugs and arms at the same time?  No one would bother you, because they would know you are untouchable...untouchable... I didn't say it...I just thought it. :roll:

Most arms dealers are also in the pharmacy business and have laundromats.

Don't you think an arms dealer and an island that is in bed with the North Koreans could be more of a threat to keep your mouth shut than the gambling part of the mafia?  I think so...we all know about Posner and his gambling...no reason to be a threat to anyone.  But...if you provide services to the high rollers with lots of money to spend....that is another thing all together.  Not that it has any connections to Natalee's disappearance...just that you might keep your mouth shut and let things go in order to maintain the status quo.  I guess I am not making any sense at all.  :roll:

Oh, I have said a few times on here that the War on Terror trumps a rape and/or murder anytime.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Magnolia on January 05, 2008, 12:04:19 AM
Update: 05-Jan- 0025 hrs

The wind and seas have not let up at all throughout day and night. Working in the rough conditions is taking its toll on some of the crew. Regardless, spirits and hope remain high as we push onwards. Working in side-seas proved unrealistic. The last resort is to dead-head straight into the seas without recording and acquire data with the swells moving with the vessel. Although time consuming, at least production is maintained even though it is at half the rate.

Many have confused adventure with inconvenience, trading the provocative for status quo. I believe exploration both in terms of our surroundings and within ourselves is the essence of human spirit. When denied, we're left feeling isolated and unknown. When we have the courage to search these depths, we learn the most about who we are and hopefully a thing or two about each other and our surroundings.

http://www.nholloway.blogspot.com/

Sounds like they may be getting a bit of cabin fever.
A weekend on shore would probably do them all a
world of good....solid ground and good food always help.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 05, 2008, 12:13:58 AM
I can't find a North Korean connection but I see the Aruban Police decided go with the Hyundai Tucson's(South Korea) for the force. I believe it's the same car as the sloots drive.

News Conference with Peter De Witte and Rudy Croes showing off the new ALE vehicles.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FjyAtSgxLkA


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Tylergal on January 05, 2008, 01:28:04 AM
This Harry Ho is a idiot,but this part of commentary is interesting. Would be nice to see Jug come back on SM Radio. I would like to hear his thoughts on Karen Janssen.
------------------------------------------
Jug Twitty commented on the recent meeting between Dave Holloway and Karin Janssen, and he enlightened Greta as to why he is so upset with Karin Janssen, the prosecutor. This interview, despite its default into the typical Twitty-Holloway response, provided some insights never before discussed. First, Jug stated that he felt that there was nothing satisfying that emerged from Dave's four-hour meeting with Janssen. Greta then queried Jug over his dissatisfaction with Janssen. Jug revisited a heated discussion with Janssen on 28 August, the last time Janssen spoke with Beth or Jug. Jug commenced with a disagreement with Janssen over the issue of whether or not that blood was discovered in the suspects' car. Jug insisted that the FBI stated that there was blood in the car. Janssen retorted that the alleged blood was in fact cleaning fluid. Jug vehemently disagreed with Janssen. Second, Jug spoke of three American witnesses who overheard implicating statements made by the suspects: Joran and Deepak. These statements, Jug says, were ignored by the Aruban investigators. According to Jug, Janssen told them to get sworn statements from these witnesses in the USA. Jug said they got a federal judge to take the statements; however, Janssen refuses to return calls to Jug and Beth concerning what to do with these statements.

Now comes the fun part. Jug was stunned when Janssen revealed family problems with Natalee. Jenssen questioned the $1 Million life insurance policy taken out on Natalee. Further contestation led to queries by Jenssen about Jug's brother's money laundering activities. At this point, Jug admitted that he is high strung. However, he feels that Jenssen is either hiding or has no backbone.

Jug takes a few breaths, then continues with the statement that Jenssen will not admit that she erred when releasing the three suspects. He ridicules her response that they were trying to catch the three red-handed exposing the crime. Jug chuckles that their entire, nine-day, surveillance effort of the three suspect produced absolutely nothing.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2500.new#new


American witnesses? 

Yes, his name was Fig Nation.  A figment of Dan Rhiel's imagination.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 05, 2008, 08:04:31 AM
I left a msg to Rob Yesterday and he never got back to me. I called because others said he is MIA :(
OT
I ran across Rob on another forum about a week and a half ago.  He waved when I signaled  and then was gone. Anyone check his website?


I check it often. I go everywhere...I roam, lol.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: MumInOhio on January 05, 2008, 08:23:06 AM
Good Morning!.....that cartoon gives me the creeps every time I see it!

Anyone else think that one cloud looks like a surviellance plane?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: wreck on January 05, 2008, 08:27:57 AM
Good Morning!.....that cartoon gives me the creeps every time I see it!

Anyone else think that one cloud looks like a surviellance plane?
I have always seen a LOT of things in that cartoon. Yes, that "cloud" looks sorta like an "AWACS" plane. The weirdest thing is the date of the cartoon (6-5-05) -- there are SO many relevant things in it that no one knew about at such a early date in this case!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: San on January 05, 2008, 08:42:37 AM
:-x


if she was in the water, there would be massive pledge to stop it


This is what I believe also.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: MumInOhio on January 05, 2008, 08:46:44 AM
Good Morning!.....that cartoon gives me the creeps every time I see it!

Anyone else think that one cloud looks like a surviellance plane?
I have always seen a LOT of things in that cartoon. Yes, that "cloud" looks sorta like an "AWACS" plane. The weirdest thing is the date of the cartoon (6-5-05) -- there are SO many relevant things in it that no one knew about at such a early date in this case!


Hi wreck! The numbers 3 and 5 in the sky, I believe means 5 suspects not 3 and I wonder if the 18 refers to simians posts about our 'favorite passtime'...'fielder or slogger'.

It has always bothered me as to why a Canadian cartoonist would not comment on this!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: San on January 05, 2008, 08:47:24 AM
This Harry Ho is a idiot,but this part of commentary is interesting. Would be nice to see Jug come back on SM Radio. I would like to hear his thoughts on Karen Janssen.
------------------------------------------
Jug Twitty commented on the recent meeting between Dave Holloway and Karin Janssen, and he enlightened Greta as to why he is so upset with Karin Janssen, the prosecutor. This interview, despite its default into the typical Twitty-Holloway response, provided some insights never before discussed. First, Jug stated that he felt that there was nothing satisfying that emerged from Dave's four-hour meeting with Janssen. Greta then queried Jug over his dissatisfaction with Janssen. Jug revisited a heated discussion with Janssen on 28 August, the last time Janssen spoke with Beth or Jug. Jug commenced with a disagreement with Janssen over the issue of whether or not that blood was discovered in the suspects' car. Jug insisted that the FBI stated that there was blood in the car. Janssen retorted that the alleged blood was in fact cleaning fluid. Jug vehemently disagreed with Janssen. Second, Jug spoke of three American witnesses who overheard implicating statements made by the suspects: Joran and Deepak. These statements, Jug says, were ignored by the Aruban investigators. According to Jug, Janssen told them to get sworn statements from these witnesses in the USA. Jug said they got a federal judge to take the statements; however, Janssen refuses to return calls to Jug and Beth concerning what to do with these statements.

Now comes the fun part. Jug was stunned when Janssen revealed family problems with Natalee. Jenssen questioned the $1 Million life insurance policy taken out on Natalee. Further contestation led to queries by Jenssen about Jug's brother's money laundering activities. At this point, Jug admitted that he is high strung. However, he feels that Jenssen is either hiding or has no backbone.

Jug takes a few breaths, then continues with the statement that Jenssen will not admit that she erred when releasing the three suspects. He ridicules her response that they were trying to catch the three red-handed exposing the crime. Jug chuckles that their entire, nine-day, surveillance effort of the three suspect produced absolutely nothing.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2500.new#new


American witnesses? 

Yes, his name was Fig Nation.  A figment of Dan Rhiel's imagination.

 :lol: :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Mere on January 05, 2008, 08:48:31 AM
Good Morning!.....that cartoon gives me the creeps every time I see it!

Anyone else think that one cloud looks like a surviellance plane?
I have always seen a LOT of things in that cartoon. Yes, that "cloud" looks sorta like an "AWACS" plane. The weirdest thing is the date of the cartoon (6-5-05) -- there are SO many relevant things in it that no one knew about at such a early date in this case!

Does anyone see anything peculiar under the hatch marks on the upper left hand corner?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: WhiskeyGirl on January 05, 2008, 09:04:37 AM
I'm not a Shango/Simian scholar, so please forgive me if I don't get the Shango reference correct.

One Shango/Simian thing that always stuck with me was the comment like "they didn't want bloody Mary's, they wanted virgin Mary's".

I always thought the "bloody Mary" reference was to the legalized prostitution, prostitutes, and any sexual slaves on the island.

Would someone in government want to be seen with this element?  Frequenting these establishments? 

What has happened to government people when they've been caught with their hands in the proverbial cookie jar?  Do they go to jail?  Lose their jobs?  Or, do they just send the illegals home?

I look at all the comments/accusations that have been tossed towards Natalee Holloway and her families and I have to scratch my head.  What did Natalee ever do to anyone on Aruba to garner these negative comments and accusations? 

She is still disappeared.  Irregardless of her circumstances, she disappeared while in the company of J2K and hasn't been seen since.

No fishermen report seeing her, no black couple on the beach has come forward to claim they saw her (that I am aware of), nothing so much as a flip flop has been found. 



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: WhiskeyGirl on January 05, 2008, 09:11:47 AM
What happened to the son of the high government official that had some trouble with an American tourist girl?

Is there a "get out of jail free" card tatooed on some foreheads?  Neithe above the law, below the law, or within in the law.  Untouchable. Teflon coated men.  Nothing ever sticks, and they like it that way.

With all the great legal minds on the island and in the Netherlands, why can't they think of a way to level the playing field?  Make justice transparent?

Why were two security guards searched and locked up so quickly?  Those that implicated them, apparently lied about many things in just a few days.  No one searched those homes for years. 

Why is there such a difference?  The two security guards were immigrants.  Those that implicated them were the sons of judges and other island elite. 

Are the words of some more important than the words of others?  Should all words be given the same weight until they are proven false?  When some words are proven false, why would law enforcement continue to believe them?

Have the legal scholars come up with a way to level the playing field? 

What happened to integrity?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: MumInOhio on January 05, 2008, 09:17:08 AM
Good Morning!.....that cartoon gives me the creeps every time I see it!

Anyone else think that one cloud looks like a surviellance plane?
I have always seen a LOT of things in that cartoon. Yes, that "cloud" looks sorta like an "AWACS" plane. The weirdest thing is the date of the cartoon (6-5-05) -- there are SO many relevant things in it that no one knew about at such a early date in this case!

Does anyone see anything peculiar under the hatch marks on the upper left hand corner?


Sorry Mere...I am not sure where to look...do you mean where all the scribbling is? TIA


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: wreck on January 05, 2008, 09:22:37 AM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub2/cartoonnatalee.jpg)
Even the "angel" looks like Anita!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: MumInOhio on January 05, 2008, 09:24:52 AM
WhiskeyGirl...I am not smart enough to translate Shango and Simian, but will keep your question in mind next time I'm reading their posts. I used to be good at riddles, but for me these are really hard. Maybe it is because I don't have an IQ of 149 like Simian does.  :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: wreck on January 05, 2008, 09:26:05 AM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub2/cartoonnatalee.jpg)
Even the "angel" looks like Anita!
look at the bottom right -- an arrow down to "a drink within a drink". At 6-5-05 these "theories"  were simply not out there yet.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: MumInOhio on January 05, 2008, 09:33:10 AM
wreck .... that 'angel' kicks me in the stomach every time I see it! Just read an old post about Anita that said 'the Mom was not detained' and another that said ' you're wrong, she went in and came out 5 minutes later'. Paraphrased both as I didn't save them!

Keep forgetting to tell you ....I love your train!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: WhiskeyGirl on January 05, 2008, 09:33:14 AM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub2/cartoonnatalee.jpg)
Even the "angel" looks like Anita!
look at the bottom right -- an arrow down to "a drink within a drink". At 6-5-05 these "theories"  were simply not out there yet.

Those theories were not out in the public yet.  The parents were searching crack houses, etc.

There would have to be time for the movement of information from witnesses, and the creation of the cartoon. 

Perhaps Natalee's remains were found by authorities as early as day two (Monday or Tuesday).  Keeping them would have certainly answered some questions.  I don't think the story developed as some thought. 

I wonder how many witnesses there are?

Where was the cartoon published?



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: greeneyedlady on January 05, 2008, 09:39:47 AM
In the corner to the side of the sign that says days until you will be kidnapped looks like it could be a cage of some sort?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: WhiskeyGirl on January 05, 2008, 09:43:20 AM
Was the arrest of the two security guards a warning to others?

Do those that run the government own the government?  Is it a form of dictatorship?

Who takes the risks and rewards of government?

Does someone own the judiciary?  Prosecutors office?  Law enforcement?  Do they function independently?

Who is responsible for the way these government bodies conduct themselves?

Who decides what the conclusion of any investigaiton should be?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: MumInOhio on January 05, 2008, 09:46:04 AM
Bringing these posts over from the Theories thread re dates and a quote Buckeye posted:


Found this scanning the Front Page posts in date order:

June 5th
                  1. Mattress found at around noon and not related to Natalee
                  2. Dompig says hold your breath  for 24 hours-there are developements

June 7th…     1. local boy found dead … Not Natalee
             …    2. accidental death not ruled out by authorities
                   3. rumor that search called off

June 9th…..J2Ks arrested

June 10th…    1. press briefing cancelled - no reason given
                   2. sightings of Natalee

-----------------------------------------------------------------------


June 4th   dutch marines search beach areas
                Police ATVs and helicopters search Arashi Beach area

June 5th   searching the St. Nicholas and Seroe Colorado Lighthouse areas

June 6th…searching Santa Cruz  and Valero areas

June 7th…Authorities said some searchers focused Monday on the eastern tip of the island, the same area searched Sunday by Dutch marines.

   ----------------------------------------------------------------

quote buckeye


There was digging off and on at the lighthouse, but I did save this.  Written by Hannah Wolfson in AJR regarding the night of the confession:

Some of the mistakes were harder to explain. Late one Friday night, CNN reported that at least one of the suspects had confessed. AP quickly followed with a report that he was leading police to the evidence. Moments later, a half dozen news crews sped down a pitch-dark dirt road toward an abandoned beach where police were supposedly digging up a body. Nothing. Officials ranging from the original source right up to the prime minister quickly denied the initial reports.
As guiltily competitive as the rest, I crept out later that night with a Birmingham television crew that was filming distant, spotty footage of men digging in the dunes – probably just local bootleggers pulling up their stash of booze.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: MumInOhio on January 05, 2008, 09:49:01 AM
GEL  I enlarged that a little this morning will go back and make it even bigger.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: MumInOhio on January 05, 2008, 10:03:23 AM
GEL  I enlarged that a little this morning will go back and make it even bigger.


Wow..that is hard on the eyes!

Will retract my post about the number 5 in the sky, it is a lower case 'b'. Jaime's nickname is 'beto' and I also see the letter 'z'.

Sorry, I could not make head nor tail of the top left hand corner.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Mere on January 05, 2008, 10:25:17 AM
GEL  I enlarged that a little this morning will go back and make it even bigger.


Wow..that is hard on the eyes!

Will retract my post about the number 5 in the sky, it is a lower case 'b'. Jaime's nickname is 'beto' and I also see the letter 'z'.

Sorry, I could not make head nor tail of the top left hand corner.

Original site of cartoon with article by Karl Penhaul

http://cartoons.diberardo.com/recent-political-cartoon/girl-murdered.php


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: MumInOhio on January 05, 2008, 10:33:55 AM
Mere...Thanks!


Frank...if you are here, I'm trying to find a link for you...check back later!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: greeneyedlady on January 05, 2008, 10:45:38 AM
GEL  I enlarged that a little this morning will go back and make it even bigger.


Wow..that is hard on the eyes!

Will retract my post about the number 5 in the sky, it is a lower case 'b'. Jaime's nickname is 'beto' and I also see the letter 'z'.

Sorry, I could not make head nor tail of the top left hand corner.

LOL Mum, I am going to have to quit looking. THe more I do the more I see that's probably not there. :shock:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Pita on January 05, 2008, 10:49:04 AM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub2/cartoonnatalee.jpg)
Even the "angel" looks like Anita!
look at the bottom right -- an arrow down to "a drink within a drink". At 6-5-05 these "theories"  were simply not out there yet.

Those theories were not out in the public yet.  The parents were searching crack houses, etc.

There would have to be time for the movement of information from witnesses, and the creation of the cartoon. 

Perhaps Natalee's remains were found by authorities as early as day two (Monday or Tuesday).  Keeping them would have certainly answered some questions.  I don't think the story developed as some thought. 

I wonder how many witnesses there are?

Where was the cartoon published?



(http://i103.photobucket.com/albums/m153/CMPM/cartoonist.jpg)
Anthony Diberardo


About the Cartoonist:

Biography
by: Carmine Funt

Anthony Diberardo is a Canadian political cartoonist who was born on the 27th of October 1476, in Canada. He spent most of his early childhood ignoring others, choosing instead to visit "happy-land". He showed artistic potential early on, often cartooning for cigarettes.
At the age of 10 he won the prestigious Royal Award for Artistic Excellence*.
He went on to win several other awards in his teen years*.

He majored in Fine Art at the University of Guelph.

In the fall of 2002 he left on a wonderful journey to South East Asia where he contracted several of the more well known STD's. There was also a brief battle with some sort of skin fungus.

For a year he taught English and Art to "a great bunch of kids", about 700 a week or so. He recalls walking into the grade three classrooms where the students used to stand and cheer, "art class!". "That made me feel really good. It was then I knew the $40,000 I spent on my degree was really worth it."

After he had his fill of street noodles, dried fish snacks and vomiting children, he drank beer in Europe for a while.

He ended up teaching again to support his "habits". This time, however, it was to university students- all English, no art. It was good. They were "a great bunch of kids".

After getting kicked out of Poland he made his triumphant* return to Southern Ontario.

Oh yes, during this time, and without even entering, he won several prestigious international awards.*

Currently he is a canadian political cartoonist who displays his work on the web, cartoons.diberardo.com, and in numerous publications*.

View diberardo's cartoons: they probably will not bite you.

* This may or may not be true, and by may I mean definitely not true.

http://cartoons.diberardo.com/about-cartoonist.php


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Tylergal on January 05, 2008, 10:52:10 AM
GEL  I enlarged that a little this morning will go back and make it even bigger.


Wow..that is hard on the eyes!

Will retract my post about the number 5 in the sky, it is a lower case 'b'. Jaime's nickname is 'beto' and I also see the letter 'z'.

Sorry, I could not make head nor tail of the top left hand corner.

Original site of cartoon with article by Karl Penhaul

http://cartoons.diberardo.com/recent-political-cartoon/girl-murdered.php
One Sunday morning about 2 years ago, JerseyMom and I were discussing this photograph and its artist, and a new poster popped up who answered the questions about it in a somewhat belligerent manner, as if he knew the artist or was the artist.  Poster never came here again to my knowledge, so I am assuming if the poster was the artist or knew the artist, he/she was guilty of more than second-guessing.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Buckeye on January 05, 2008, 10:52:17 AM
Good Morning!.....that cartoon gives me the creeps every time I see it!

Anyone else think that one cloud looks like a surviellance plane?
I have always seen a LOT of things in that cartoon. Yes, that "cloud" looks sorta like an "AWACS" plane. The weirdest thing is the date of the cartoon (6-5-05) -- there are SO many relevant things in it that no one knew about at such a early date in this case!

Does anyone see anything peculiar under the hatch marks on the upper left hand corner?

There is a sketch of a man standing behind someone bent over.....very similar to the clips from the porn video in Deepak car....but I don't see a mask....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: MumInOhio on January 05, 2008, 10:53:10 AM
Frank....I posted this the other day....Check out the last link for an article by our friend Ms JA. The top link won't work :roll:

The 10-year agreements governing these facilities limit their use to counter-drug missions, mainly those of aircraft seeking to detect and monitor illegal drug-smuggling in the huge “transit zone” between the Andes and the United States’ southern border.
The agreements governing all three sites will be up for renewal within the next four years


news.nacla.org/2007/09/18/monitoring-the-us-military-presence-in-latin-america/



Forward Operating Location (FOL). Funding was provided to maintain and operate the FOL in Aruba. This FOL
consists of 1 facility which is a building. FOL Aruba provides an overflow capability to facilitate counterdrug detection and monitoring operations within the USSOUTHCOM AOR. FOL Aruba provides communication and contracting support to aircrews. (PC9500) Total FY05 Funding: $1.534M. Cost breakout is as follows:
·   Bandwidth expense ($500K) ·   
             Civil engineering/contracting support to building/ramp projects ($552K)
·   Direct support to include Air Expeditionary Forces Communication person per diem and travel, lodging, environmental baseline study, and miscellaneous contracts ($430K)
·   Air Combat Command Program Management System expense ($50K)
·   Base operating support contract support ($2K)

http://www.ciponline.org/colombia/blog/archives/000347.htm








Interesting article from someone we have discussed. Very interesting!


http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/48722.pdf

Lol GEL..I know what you mean!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: MumInOhio on January 05, 2008, 11:01:12 AM
GEL  I enlarged that a little this morning will go back and make it even bigger.


Wow..that is hard on the eyes!

Will retract my post about the number 5 in the sky, it is a lower case 'b'. Jaime's nickname is 'beto' and I also see the letter 'z'.

Sorry, I could not make head nor tail of the top left hand corner.

Original site of cartoon with article by Karl Penhaul

http://cartoons.diberardo.com/recent-political-cartoon/girl-murdered.php
One Sunday morning about 2 years ago, JerseyMom and I were discussing this photograph and its artist, and a new poster popped up who answered the questions about it in a somewhat belligerent manner, as if he knew the artist or was the artist.  Poster never came here again to my knowledge, so I am assuming if the poster was the artist or knew the artist, he/she was guilty of more than second-guessing.


Thanks Tyler....I do recall several posters tried to contact him, but he did not respond.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 05, 2008, 11:37:13 AM
Prior the June 7, 2005 published cartoon .... Diberardo had to have been privy to inside information pertaining to Joran's May 31, 2005 missing declaration ... the missing declaration.

Deepak and Satish May 31, 2005 declarations imply that that Joran must have diverted from the Holiday Inn fabrication.

Janet

++++++++++++++++++++++

http://cartoons.diberardo.com/recent-political-cartoon/girl-murdered.php
Search continues for teen missing in Aruba
Government workers join hunt for Alabama woman
Tuesday, June 7, 2005 Posted: 9:37 AM EDT (1337 GMT)


Joran Van der Sloot
Suspect Statement
June 14, 2005


At approximately 12.30 (May 31, 2005) my dad and me had arrived at Bubali police station. I was interviewed as a witness. I cannot remember that in my statement I had said that I had been at Fisherman's Huts with Natalee. I might be possible that I stated that.


Deepak Kalpoe
Witness Statement
May 31, 2005


On your question if Joran and the girl had stepped from my car at the Fisherman’s Huts and walked by the sea; I will answer you no.


Satish Kalpoe
Witness Statement
May 31, 2005


On your question if Joran and the girl had gotten out of the car at the Fisherman’s Huts and walked by the sea; I answer you no. Joran and the girl never got out of Deepak’s car.


Beth Twitty
'Rita Cosby Live & Direct'
September 14, 2005


TWITTY: Well, Rita, like I said, we‘ve been worried as early as June 1 when we saw torn statements at a police station.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: MumInOhio on January 05, 2008, 11:47:02 AM
Tamikosmom.... is this the one you mean? Or maybe this is the revamped one!

Joran van der Sloot

Name: loran van der Sloot
Date: 31 May 2005 111:20
Pages: 5
Writer/initiator. Dennis Jacobs / Shaniro Kelly
Description: statement as a witness

Name: Joran van der Sloot
Date: 31 May 2005 / 11;20
Pages: 6 (1 attachment)
Writer/Initiator: Marcelino Ras I Ghrizanti Tromp
Description: statement as a witness and indication of an area


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Mere on January 05, 2008, 11:48:54 AM
Re the cartoon:

The hatch marks at the upper left appear to cover something...also drawn with straight lines...so it is necessary to print the cartoon and use good lighting and perhaps a magnifying glass.  I see at the very edge of the paper under the hatchmarks a larger house and then a small one room house-type figure next to it.  I always thought that referred to Joran's apartment.

I'll stop as I know that we have covered this off and on for the past 2+ years.  It has always been a mystery.  It looks like Karl may have been his source.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: MumInOhio on January 05, 2008, 12:05:01 PM
Re the cartoon:

The hatch marks at the upper left appear to cover something...also drawn with straight lines...so it is necessary to print the cartoon and use good lighting and perhaps a magnifying glass.  I see at the very edge of the paper under the hatchmarks a larger house and then a small one room house-type figure next to it.  I always thought that referred to Joran's apartment.

I'll stop as I know that we have covered this off and on for the past 2+ years.  It has always been a mystery.  It looks like Karl may have been his source.


Mere...when I had it up to 400% I could see a house. Sorry, who is Karl, is he the CNN reporter? TIA


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 05, 2008, 12:05:59 PM
Re the cartoon:

The hatch marks at the upper left appear to cover something...also drawn with straight lines...so it is necessary to print the cartoon and use good lighting and perhaps a magnifying glass.  I see at the very edge of the paper under the hatchmarks a larger house and then a small one room house-type figure next to it.  I always thought that referred to Joran's apartment.

I'll stop as I know that we have covered this off and on for the past 2+ years.  It has always been a mystery.  It looks like Karl may have been his source.

Karl who? 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: MumInOhio on January 05, 2008, 12:15:12 PM
Re the cartoon:

The hatch marks at the upper left appear to cover something...also drawn with straight lines...so it is necessary to print the cartoon and use good lighting and perhaps a magnifying glass.  I see at the very edge of the paper under the hatchmarks a larger house and then a small one room house-type figure next to it.  I always thought that referred to Joran's apartment.

I'll stop as I know that we have covered this off and on for the past 2+ years.  It has always been a mystery.  It looks like Karl may have been his source.

Karl who? 


LOL...I think Mere left and all I can think of is Nancy Grace's Karl Penhaul, but I really don't have a clue other than that!

Do you think that the topic of discussion from last night might 'shock the world'? TIA



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 05, 2008, 12:16:13 PM
WOW...he is older than Robots!!  :P

Anthony Diberardo is a Canadian political cartoonist who was born on the 27th of October 1476, in Canada.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 05, 2008, 12:18:18 PM
Re the cartoon:

The hatch marks at the upper left appear to cover something...also drawn with straight lines...so it is necessary to print the cartoon and use good lighting and perhaps a magnifying glass.  I see at the very edge of the paper under the hatchmarks a larger house and then a small one room house-type figure next to it.  I always thought that referred to Joran's apartment.

I'll stop as I know that we have covered this off and on for the past 2+ years.  It has always been a mystery.  It looks like Karl may have been his source.

Karl who? 


LOL...I think Mere left and all I can think of is Nancy Grace's Karl Penhaul, but I really don't have a clue other than that!

Do you think that the topic of discussion from last night might 'shock the world'? TIA



If you are talking about the nuclear arms...I would think so to some extent. It certainly trumps two bit drug dealers any day.  Which reminds me of another idea but I am actually afraid to say anything without approval...let me just say it involves the Russian mafia and North Korea.  These two countries would have a common goal and if they are working on it together...well then...you have the bigger fish to fry right there. MOO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 05, 2008, 12:22:18 PM
Tamikosmom.... is this the one you mean? Or maybe this is the revamped one!

Joran van der Sloot

Name: loran van der Sloot
Date: 31 May 2005 111:20
Pages: 5
Writer/initiator. Dennis Jacobs / Shaniro Kelly
Description: statement as a witness

Name: Joran van der Sloot
Date: 31 May 2005 / 11;20
Pages: 6 (1 attachment)
Writer/Initiator: Marcelino Ras I Ghrizanti Tromp
Description: statement as a witness and indication of an area

Mum ... in their declarations .... Joran and Paulus both refer to Joran's May 31, 2005 witness questioning as well as ... the drive that he took with authorities but ... the May 31, 2005 declaration  and attachment has never been revealed.

When you take the Fisherman Hut/Marriot Beach question presented to each of the Kalpoe brothers in their May 31, 2005 witness  interrogation ... it is obvious that Joran had diverted from the Holiday Inn account in his May 31, 2005 witness statment that was given just a short time prior.

In his June 9, 2005 suspect statement ... Joran has reverted back to the Holiday Inn dropoff.  The Marriot Beach dropoff does not emerge until Joran's June 14, 2005 suspect statement.

Janet

+++++++++++++++++

Joran van der Sloot
Suspect Statement
June 9, 2005


We drove back to the Holiday Inn Hotel to drop Natalee off there. When we arrived there Deepak parked on the left lane and not on the right lane that lies in front of the Lobby. Natalee got out the back door on the right side and she fell to the floor. I got out of the same car door and helped her get up. After I did that Natalee said to me not to touch her and she walked into the direction/towards the lobby. I saw that she touched a pillar.


Joran van der Sloot
Suspect Statement
June 14, 2005


When we, on May 30th, stopped in Deepak's car in front of my house, it was about 01.40 am. At that moment in time Deepak, Satish, Natalee and myself were in Deepak's car.

When Natalee and myself were dropped off at the Marriot Hotel by Satish and Deepak it was approximately 01.50 am. After we were dropped off Natalee and myself walked to the beach in front of the Marriot Hotel.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 05, 2008, 12:27:54 PM
This may be unpopular here but...if this cartoon was published 6/7/05 then all that is in the cartoon was already known.  If this guy is as good an artist as he seems...it would not take very long to draw that cartoon maybe only a few hours.  So how are we getting the idea that this was done before any of this stuff was known?  I am confused...once again. TIA


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: San on January 05, 2008, 12:35:09 PM
Re the cartoon:

The hatch marks at the upper left appear to cover something...also drawn with straight lines...so it is necessary to print the cartoon and use good lighting and perhaps a magnifying glass.  I see at the very edge of the paper under the hatchmarks a larger house and then a small one room house-type figure next to it.  I always thought that referred to Joran's apartment.

I'll stop as I know that we have covered this off and on for the past 2+ years.  It has always been a mystery.  It looks like Karl may have been his source.

I never realized that was a house Mere until you just told me.  It could have been mentioned before but I could have missed it.  I also agree that it is the Van der Sloot house.  As far as it being Joran's apartment it could be or even the shed in the Sloot dump.

It is always good to go over things again because people miss stuff.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 05, 2008, 12:39:46 PM
I'm not a Shango/Simian scholar, so please forgive me if I don't get the Shango reference correct.

One Shango/Simian thing that always stuck with me was the comment like "they didn't want bloody Mary's, they wanted virgin Mary's".  Never read the "bloody" reference in Shango.  Where did you see this.  It is speculated that this could mean that Mary was already drugged by the time she went to the party OR that she was and innocent person that didn't know what happened to her until it was too late. (No offense to Christians here.) OR that she wasn't as innocent sexually as we think, but still she was led to the slaughter without her knowing.  Many interpretations....no answers. I may be over reading Shango again...I have seen it so many times I tend to skip things I already know and forget more than I remember.

I always thought the "bloody Mary" reference was to the legalized prostitution, prostitutes, and any sexual slaves on the island.  Again where is this reference? Please.

Would someone in government want to be seen with this element?  Frequenting these establishments?  Government seems to run these establishments.  Doubt that is the case. Take Rudy Croes history in this for example.

What has happened to government people when they've been caught with their hands in the proverbial cookie jar?  Do they go to jail?  Lose their jobs?  Or, do they just send the illegals home?  It appears that they just pickup locals and let them serve the time on trumped up charges. The Dutch rule Aruba.

I look at all the comments/accusations that have been tossed towards Natalee Holloway and her families and I have to scratch my head.  What did Natalee ever do to anyone on Aruba to garner these negative comments and accusations?  She was the reason they got caught.

She is still disappeared.  Irregardless of her circumstances, she disappeared while in the company of J2K and hasn't been seen since.  Yes.

No fishermen report seeing her, no black couple on the beach has come forward to claim they saw her (that I am aware of), nothing so much as a flip flop has been found.  If you are studying Shango....he said they never went to the beach....they never built sandcastles.





Hope this helps answer some of your questions. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Mere on January 05, 2008, 12:42:16 PM
GEL  I enlarged that a little this morning will go back and make it even bigger.


Wow..that is hard on the eyes!

Will retract my post about the number 5 in the sky, it is a lower case 'b'. Jaime's nickname is 'beto' and I also see the letter 'z'.

Sorry, I could not make head nor tail of the top left hand corner.

Original site of cartoon with article by Karl Penhaul

http://cartoons.diberardo.com/recent-political-cartoon/girl-murdered.php

And, yes, that would be Nancy Grace's Karl Penhaul...lol...!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: MumInOhio on January 05, 2008, 12:44:40 PM
This may be unpopular here but...if this cartoon was published 6/7/05 then all that is in the cartoon was already known.  If this guy is as good an artist as he seems...it would not take very long to draw that cartoon maybe only a few hours.  So how are we getting the idea that this was done before any of this stuff was known?  I am confused...once again. TIA


LOL...I just went back and opened the link, sorry Mere it is a pain, as I have my pop up blocker set high and go back and open links later.

Lala's is right and so was I. Kar=Penhaul and the cartoon was done on the 7th.

I wonder why he thinks it is a political cartoon?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Magnolia on January 05, 2008, 12:55:22 PM
Re the cartoon:

The hatch marks at the upper left appear to cover something...also drawn with straight lines...so it is necessary to print the cartoon and use good lighting and perhaps a magnifying glass.  I see at the very edge of the paper under the hatchmarks a larger house and then a small one room house-type figure next to it.  I always thought that referred to Joran's apartment.

I'll stop as I know that we have covered this off and on for the past 2+ years.  It has always been a mystery.  It looks like Karl may have been his source.

I never realized that was a house Mere until you just told me.  It could have been mentioned before but I could have missed it.  I also agree that it is the Van der Sloot house.  As far as it being Joran's apartment it could be or even the shed in the Sloot dump.

It is always good to go over things again because people miss stuff.

It looks like a church with a cemetery beside it to me.
I can see a steeple.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: MumInOhio on January 05, 2008, 01:03:17 PM
Maybe I should have got some new glasses for Christmas...... :lol:


Somehow I miss things when I'm posting....much more focused when I'm just reading....Mum always said you can't do two things at once and do them well!



Magnolia...I seem to remember that being discussed ages ago. I did see what you said was a steeple! Concluded it was a chimney, but after further thought I don't think they need those in Aruba!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: friend of monkeys on January 05, 2008, 01:03:33 PM
Good Morning!.....that cartoon gives me the creeps every time I see it!

Anyone else think that one cloud looks like a surviellance plane?
I have always seen a LOT of things in that cartoon. Yes, that "cloud" looks sorta like an "AWACS" plane. The weirdest thing is the date of the cartoon (6-5-05) -- there are SO many relevant things in it that no one knew about at such a early date in this case!

Does anyone see anything peculiar under the hatch marks on the upper left hand corner?

There is a sketch of a man standing behind someone bent over.....very similar to the clips from the porn video in Deepak car....but I don't see a mask....

Looks lilke a toilet w/ someone bent over it to me...... :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 05, 2008, 01:05:48 PM
http://www.24ora.com/content/view/3363/8/

Looks like another traffic fatality.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Kat_Gram on January 05, 2008, 01:10:00 PM
I was just curious what people managed to ferret via the web about the alleged disposal. I find it fascinating how resourceful and imaginative people can be.  I suppose it beats playing windows solitare, or watching night time drama on TBS. Hopefully, when this is over we'll see who was right on the mark and who missed it completely.  Personally, I've always been a fan of Occam's Razor, but I won't comment on whether or not I feel it applies in this case.
I am a fan of simple.
I do not believe most of Dompig's theories that he passed off as fact.
Something about the timeline of the Monday evening does not add up. We don't know where Koen or Sander Gottenbos were ( they have the boat),  and there are time fragments missing where we only have Joran's word for where he was. He was in the Racquet Club and then the casinos, but there are chunks of time where he left to go home with Guido Wever and then later when Beth and Jug arrived, there was a misunderstanding as to his whereabouts.
He was moving from one casino to another, disinterested ppl to this case saw him at
several locations, but the time is not all accounted for.
We also don't know where Steve Croes was the Monday night, working on the Tattoo 
I suppose, but when did he start work and when did his shift end. He inserted himself into this case with an alibi for someone he hardly knew and that doesn't sit well with me.
I don't care who was right or who missed it. Find her and it doesn't matter .


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 05, 2008, 01:30:49 PM
I was just curious what people managed to ferret via the web about the alleged disposal. I find it fascinating how resourceful and imaginative people can be.  I suppose it beats playing windows solitare, or watching night time drama on TBS. Hopefully, when this is over we'll see who was right on the mark and who missed it completely.  Personally, I've always been a fan of Occam's Razor, but I won't comment on whether or not I feel it applies in this case.
I am a fan of simple.
I do not believe most of Dompig's theories that he passed off as fact.
Something about the timeline of the Monday evening does not add up. We don't know where Koen or Sander Gottenbos were ( they have the boat),  and there are time fragments missing where we only have Joran's word for where he was. He was in the Racquet Club and then the casinos, but there are chunks of time where he left to go home with Guido Wever and then later when Beth and Jug arrived, there was a misunderstanding as to his whereabouts.
He was moving from one casino to another, disinterested ppl to this case saw him at
several locations, but the time is not all accounted for.
We also don't know where Steve Croes was the Monday night, working on the Tattoo 
I suppose, but when did he start work and when did his shift end. He inserted himself into this case with an alibi for someone he hardly knew and that doesn't sit well with me.
I don't care who was right or who missed it. Find her and it doesn't matter .

I think Steve Croes was paid to help with the body...Paulus paid him to dispose of the body and then he paid him again to provide the HI alibi.  Only thing, Croes wasn't watching the television and didn't know the alibi  had been debunked and he fell into a trap that got him jail time and a warning to keep his mouth shut.  Steve Croes was in too deep in other things and this made him vulnerable to being blackmailed and a host of other things.  The only reason he is still alive now is because he has been silent.  That was evident when Greta caught up with him heading to the airport that day.  He made no sense whatsoever yet, he has been allowed to continue his life, as have many others, as before. I suspect his tongue was bloody right along with Joran's.

Kalpoes have kept their mouths shut....they are free.  Freddy kept his mouth shut...he's free and they arrested him on porn charges or something to that effect.  Mos knew he could not get anyone to rat out the other one even before he took this case....it's a code of silence that has that island in it's grip and until it's broken nothing will get any better.  Too much money is involved.  It's true...Money talks....and well you know the rest.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Kat_Gram on January 05, 2008, 02:12:58 PM
I tend to agree with you about Steve Croes. His access to boats .. ie the boat that takes the partygoers to the Tattoo and the route that the smaller boat takes. It would not look like anything suspicious to see Steve in a boat coming and going to and from the Tattoo. I think the people who would know anything are close to the Sloots or they have their own involvement in something else.
.
If there was a disposal at sea, it would have been done within the first 30 hours or so. There was no premeditation to cause her death, but the past history of the activity against tourist girls is the predictor.
 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: bleachedblack on January 05, 2008, 02:16:45 PM
Actually, it would be great if the Monkeys et al., could come up with a verifiable timeline for the alleged disposal.  ie: -How long were they gone, how is this known (w/sources) min/max.  Then we can do a little comparison.  That might be a good excercise if interested.


Not  specific to disposal but a good timeline, not sure if you have seen this:

http://tinyurl.com/2a8ors


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: bleachedblack on January 05, 2008, 02:19:14 PM
Actually, it would be great if the Monkeys et al., could come up with a verifiable timeline for the alleged disposal.  ie: -How long were they gone, how is this known (w/sources) min/max.  Then we can do a little comparison.  That might be a good excercise if interested.


Not  specific to disposal but a good timeline, not sure if you have seen this:

http://tinyurl.com/2a8ors

oops sorry looks like Worldjournier has taken down the timeline   :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: dennisintn on January 05, 2008, 02:36:10 PM
I tend to agree with you about Steve Croes. His access to boats .. ie the boat that takes the partygoers to the Tattoo and the route that the smaller boat takes. It would not look like anything suspicious to see Steve in a boat coming and going to and from the Tattoo. I think the people who would know anything are close to the Sloots or they have their own involvement in something else.
.
If there was a disposal at sea, it would have been done within the first 30 hours or so. There was no premeditation to cause her death, but the past history of the activity against tourist girls is the predictor.
 
kat, i totally agree with all of this.
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Tylergal on January 05, 2008, 02:53:17 PM
I tend to agree with you about Steve Croes. His access to boats .. ie the boat that takes the partygoers to the Tattoo and the route that the smaller boat takes. It would not look like anything suspicious to see Steve in a boat coming and going to and from the Tattoo. I think the people who would know anything are close to the Sloots or they have their own involvement in something else.
.
If there was a disposal at sea, it would have been done within the first 30 hours or so. There was no premeditation to cause her death, but the past history of the activity against tourist girls is the predictor.
 

Yes, agree with that and what about a few nights after he was fired from the Tattoo, he was working as a DJ at c&c and while Greta was interviewing Beth, he is playing "another one bites the dust."


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: flyer33716 on January 05, 2008, 03:39:03 PM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub2/cartoonnatalee.jpg)
Even the "angel" looks like Anita!
look at the bottom right -- an arrow down to "a drink within a drink". At 6-5-05 these "theories"  were simply not out there yet.

look at the shallow grave in the picture. It sure looks like a boat on it's side


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: AZSunny on January 05, 2008, 04:06:07 PM
You are so right!  I had never seen the boat before.  even  the area where he wrote 'shallow grave' is like where a name would be placed on a boat.  there also appears to be barnacles on the bottom, and the beginnings of a mast!!  Good observation. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 05, 2008, 04:06:28 PM
Is he wearing Joran's pimpin' shirt  :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 05, 2008, 04:15:45 PM
 X. Persistence

Update: 05-Jan-1610 hrs
The Persistence arrived dockside at 0500 hrs after a long night offshore. A few hours sitting still at the dock is revitalizing for a few of the beleaguered crew. Outside, the winds are unrelenting and whip the sea into angry white caps which crash onto the protective reef skirting the harbor. Even the heartiest seabirds have taken cover. The tourist submersible Atlantis II cancels its evening tour in lieu of being forced backwards by the driving currents. Inside, the Persistence is bustling with the daily chores of living on board a boat. With a whistle and a rumble, the twin Diesels comes alive without complaint. Once they’re warm, the lines are tossed and we’re off.

http://nholloway.blogspot.com/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Kat_Gram on January 05, 2008, 04:15:58 PM
I tend to agree with you about Steve Croes. His access to boats .. ie the boat that takes the partygoers to the Tattoo and the route that the smaller boat takes. It would not look like anything suspicious to see Steve in a boat coming and going to and from the Tattoo. I think the people who would know anything are close to the Sloots or they have their own involvement in something else.
.
If there was a disposal at sea, it would have been done within the first 30 hours or so. There was no premeditation to cause her death, but the past history of the activity against tourist girls is the predictor.
 
kat, i totally agree with all of this.
dennisintn
Well, TY, but it really doesn't matter does it ?
The last hope to find Natalee rests with the ship and its crew and God.
I am hoping that they are successful.
And I also hope they have some technical evidence to do with " pings " from cell phones from the three or four. 
I find the technology very interesting and have been reading up on Kyle.
I am not discounting previous searches in the water, but they did not have this equipment or these experts to use the equipment and to analyze the data and to send the ROV's down to investigate.
..
I want to backtrack on my cage issue. The cage went missing when ? We would only know that if we knew :
a) when was the last time the fishermen used or saw the cage and when did they notice that it was no longer there ? The fishermen were on the beach the late Sunday night, I guess they go fishing late. Was it what time the next night they noticed the cage was missing and the huts were broken into ?
b.) Is this a regular happening, that the Huts are broken into ?
Not everything that happened on Aruba in that narrow time period is related to Natalee. Other crimes were committed. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 05, 2008, 04:17:46 PM
You feeling lucky OE? Please god,let this be the day!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: flyer33716 on January 05, 2008, 04:19:00 PM
You are so right!  I had never seen the boat before.  even  the area where he wrote 'shallow grave' is like where a name would be placed on a boat.  there also appears to be barnacles on the bottom, and the beginnings of a mast!!  Good observation. 
could it be that they are not raising high and hell water because they are searching too deep? THe question would be which boats are sunk close to shore? I believe there was a boat you can see from shore that is sunk. The boat in the picture looks like a cattamaroon(spelling?). Just thoughts


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: wreck on January 05, 2008, 04:25:45 PM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub2/cartoonnatalee.jpg)
Even the "angel" looks like Anita!
look at the bottom right -- an arrow down to "a drink within a drink". At 6-5-05 these "theories"  were simply not out there yet.

look at the shallow grave in the picture. It sure looks like a boat on it's side
Other things to note:
Natalee's "eyes closed" or missing near drink (implying she didn't see it coming)
It looks like people from the Holiday Inn are "watching" from the windows
"letters" in the sky : "m" or "3" , "i" , "v"  (any combination of these letters significant?? "M.I.V." etc.?)
the numeral "2" on each backpack strap
several more that we have discussed before!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: BTgirl on January 05, 2008, 04:32:50 PM
I was clicking on some links at the bottom of an internet page and came across this. Is this a petition that we know about?

http://www.youchoose.net/campaign/boycott_aruba_for_natalee#campaignpeopletab

Sorry if this is something that everyone else was already aware of. Sometimes I lose track of things. :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: BTgirl on January 05, 2008, 04:36:47 PM
I was clicking on some links at the bottom of an internet page and came across this. Is this a petition that we know about?

http://www.youchoose.net/campaign/boycott_aruba_for_natalee#campaignpeopletab

Sorry if this is something that everyone else was already aware of. Sometimes I lose track of things. :roll:

I think that link I just gave goes to the second page of the site, rather than to the petition page. Try this: http://www.youchoose.net/campaign/boycott_aruba_for_natalee#campaignnodetab


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: hotping on January 05, 2008, 04:38:27 PM
You are so right!  I had never seen the boat before.  even  the area where he wrote 'shallow grave' is like where a name would be placed on a boat.  there also appears to be barnacles on the bottom, and the beginnings of a mast!!  Good observation. 
could it be that they are not raising high and hell water because they are searching too deep? THe question would be which boats are sunk close to shore? I believe there was a boat you can see from shore that is sunk. The boat in the picture looks like a cattamaroon(spelling?). Just thoughts
                                                                                                            Could someone else please go to the Ocean Search Aruba thread and read the postings for Dec 23  912AM by Blonde and Dec 25Th 758AM and see the connection that I think I see. Thanks


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Kat_Gram on January 05, 2008, 04:38:34 PM
S Croes looks like he has lost weight.
In keeping with my Simple :
a.) Disposal done by the known suspects and ppl close to them
b.) Close to the area where they were ... the casinos .. just North of the Marriott 
c.) with what was at hand and readily available to them
We know that the three primary suspects are not part of some sofisticated organized crime operation. 
The lack of an investigation properly done is another story. That has to tie into Paulus Van Der Sloot and his former job working for Rudy Croes and Ben Vocking and his job as director of KIA. They have the connections those three punks do not to make all of this "unhappen ". The statements, etc, the NO EVIDENCE. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Magnolia on January 05, 2008, 04:46:20 PM
Correct me if I am wrong,,but I was thinking.....
Joran was talking too much at school and Paulus picked him up.
They went to the police station and gave a statement at 12:30.
What did they do after that?
They had the afternoon to do their dirty work.
The sea disposal would have been much easier in the daylight.
Nobody would pay any attention to a small boat going out
in the afternoon.
The thing that makes me think the Gottenbos' boat was
Koen being so afraid and them moving away....but that does
not make it so.  Lorenzo could have gone out in the afternoon.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Magnolia on January 05, 2008, 05:04:10 PM
There was a catamaran that went down a few months ago.
It caught fire and had several tourist on it.
Several people on small boats in the area came to the rescue
and helped the tourist get to shore.  The boat belonged
to someone connected with the tourism bunch.
It was on the front page of the Aruban newspaper
and Renfro et al were all upset about it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 05, 2008, 05:04:35 PM
You are so right!  I had never seen the boat before.  even  the area where he wrote 'shallow grave' is like where a name would be placed on a boat.  there also appears to be barnacles on the bottom, and the beginnings of a mast!!  Good observation. 
could it be that they are not raising high and hell water because they are searching too deep? THe question would be which boats are sunk close to shore? I believe there was a boat you can see from shore that is sunk. The boat in the picture looks like a cattamaroon(spelling?). Just thoughts
                                                                                                            Could someone else please go to the Ocean Search Aruba thread and read the postings for Dec 23  912AM by Blonde and Dec 25Th 758AM and see the connection that I think I see. Thanks
If something comes to light about the man with the DARKEST hair, and his comments on his ‘high and mighty’ status.. might lead you to this area that I see.

I asked if they could tell us more about this person,I dont have a clue who it could be?? Anyone have a idea?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Magnolia on January 05, 2008, 05:16:09 PM
Isn't there a white boat half sticking out of the water
near what used to be the pier area at the Valero village?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 05, 2008, 05:42:55 PM
Correct me if I am wrong,,but I was thinking.....
Joran was talking too much at school and Paulus picked him up.
They went to the police station and gave a statement at 12:30.
What did they do after that?
They had the afternoon to do their dirty work.
The sea disposal would have been much easier in the daylight.
Nobody would pay any attention to a small boat going out
in the afternoon.
The thing that makes me think the Gottenbos' boat was
Koen being so afraid and them moving away....but that does
not make it so.  Lorenzo could have gone out in the afternoon.

Hi Magnolia,As far as I am concerned they had lots of unaccounted for time after the 30th and the next few days. We know Natalee was probably dead within 5 hours so she probably was disposed of rather quickly. No sense in having a dead body laying around on the property. It's all speculation after that but she had to be buried temporarily or taken out to sea on the 30th. My guess would be PVDS got her off the property quickly on may30th and within a few days arranged her disposal by sea. Most likely with the help of Koen,SGC or Lorenzo in that order. MO I would like to hear more on why TJ Ward thinks PVDS had Colombian contacts that he may have called to take Natalee off the island.

The Gottenbo's and SGC would probably have the same launch spot but what about Lorenzo? If one of these 3 were involved they most likely just went a few miles out and did the dirty deed. No sense in risk getting caught or seen someplace suspicious with a dead body,it was probably done quickly and within 45 minutes or so from where they launched the boat. Over 300 feet of water would be sufficient,why risk going to far out if you were one of these 3 with a boat and it was May 30th to early june 2005?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 05, 2008, 05:55:04 PM
You are so right!  I had never seen the boat before.  even  the area where he wrote 'shallow grave' is like where a name would be placed on a boat.  there also appears to be barnacles on the bottom, and the beginnings of a mast!!  Good observation. 
could it be that they are not raising high and hell water because they are searching too deep? THe question would be which boats are sunk close to shore? I believe there was a boat you can see from shore that is sunk. The boat in the picture looks like a cattamaroon(spelling?). Just thoughts
                                                                                                            Could someone else please go to the Ocean Search Aruba thread and read the postings for Dec 23  912AM by Blonde and Dec 25Th 758AM and see the connection that I think I see. Thanks

I'm not finding it.  How many total comments are there in the section you're referring to?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 05, 2008, 06:04:33 PM
As far as the Gottenbo's boat being the most likely vessel in disposing of Natalee I agree. What is their part in all of this? Why would Koen hide when Natalee's family drove by his house? Why would Michael Dompig tell Dave that PVDS might have used that boat to dispose of NH? We heard about how nervous koen was and Art Wood begging for him to be questioned about the boat but never was. He also lied about playing tennis with Joran on May 30th why would he lie about that?

From my recollection I believe his Father didn't want him to be questioned again and spoke for him or something. One of the people in the OM I thought even quit over this issue? We also know that Sander said his cell phone was stolen the day Natalee went missing. We know since then they sold there House,Boat and Business and fled to Georgia. While the two boys are most likely in holland.







Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 05, 2008, 06:06:20 PM
You are so right!  I had never seen the boat before.  even  the area where he wrote 'shallow grave' is like where a name would be placed on a boat.  there also appears to be barnacles on the bottom, and the beginnings of a mast!!  Good observation. 
could it be that they are not raising high and hell water because they are searching too deep? THe question would be which boats are sunk close to shore? I believe there was a boat you can see from shore that is sunk. The boat in the picture looks like a cattamaroon(spelling?). Just thoughts
                                                                                                            Could someone else please go to the Ocean Search Aruba thread and read the postings for Dec 23  912AM by Blonde and Dec 25Th 758AM and see the connection that I think I see. Thanks

I'm not finding it.  How many total comments are there in the section you're referring to?

Is this what you are talking about?


Please send this info, this was sent to me by a girl who says she can see where Natalee is I'm just passing this on





 I am not one to jump into information like this so fast.  The boat I see is a ‘sail boat,’ probable sunk just within the last few years.

Off a small land area that is swimmable to a main shore but far.  Almost private property if that is possible in the ocean.

Finding her will not happen, finding pieces might I am sorry if that is too realistic,.

.  Is she missing a bag or purse or back pack, luggage, bigger then smaller, that you will find asap.

Good luck, I feel nothing but compassion and love for the family.

 

If something comes to light about the man with the DARKEST hair, and his comments on his ‘high and mighty’ status.. might lead you to this area that I see.

I am not going to put any more into this unless you ask





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 05, 2008, 06:10:50 PM
I just found this email, can you pass it on , thanks  carpe
 
 I met a girl tonight who see's dead people her name is Rebecca she help the FBI and police find missing people.
She calls her self spiritaul contact.
I told her that I'm looking for Natalee she started talking fast and sweeting.
She said she was in a black bag near that boat near an island with nine trees two were different
She is caught up in a back and forth thing near a sunk boat  the boat is under the water and part of it you can see it's white .
 



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: hotping on January 05, 2008, 06:15:03 PM
You are so right!  I had never seen the boat before.  even  the area where he wrote 'shallow grave' is like where a name would be placed on a boat.  there also appears to be barnacles on the bottom, and the beginnings of a mast!!  Good observation. 
could it be that they are not raising high and hell water because they are searching too deep? THe question would be which boats are sunk close to shore? I believe there was a boat you can see from shore that is sunk. The boat in the picture looks like a cattamaroon(spelling?). Just thoughts
                                                                                                            Could someone else please go to the Ocean Search Aruba thread and read the postings for Dec 23  912AM by Blonde and Dec 25Th 758AM and see the connection that I think I see. Thanks

I'm not finding it.  How many total comments are there in the section you're referring to?
Its pg 2 of the Ocean Search Aruba Dec 2007...I just think that its a strange coincidence that different people think She is near a sunken boat.....MO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 05, 2008, 06:21:48 PM
Would you ask a friend of your son's to loan you a boat no questions asked?  Would you go to a friend and tell them you need to borrow their boat...when you probably have never borrowed their boat before?  If your son had used a friend's boat and then told you about it all, would you have the ability to cover it up and keep all involved from talking? How would you do that?  How would you keep the father of the friend from talking?  How would you keep Joran's friends quiet?  How would you stop the snowball effect that would inevitably take place if you could not stop everyone from talking?   Who has the power to make this happen?  I don't suppose I am looking for answers to these questions, instead I am just thinking out loud. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: hotping on January 05, 2008, 06:25:24 PM
You are so right!  I had never seen the boat before.  even  the area where he wrote 'shallow grave' is like where a name would be placed on a boat.  there also appears to be barnacles on the bottom, and the beginnings of a mast!!  Good observation. 
could it be that they are not raising high and hell water because they are searching too deep? THe question would be which boats are sunk close to shore? I believe there was a boat you can see from shore that is sunk. The boat in the picture looks like a cattamaroon(spelling?). Just thoughts
                                                                                                            Could someone else please go to the Ocean Search Aruba thread and read the postings for Dec 23  912AM by Blonde and Dec 25Th 758AM and see the connection that I think I see. Thanks

I'm not finding it.  How many total comments are there in the section you're referring to?
Its pg 2 of the Ocean Search Aruba Dec 2007...I just think that its a strange coincidence that different people think She is near a sunken boat.....MO
Yes...That is it the emails about Natalee being near a sunken boat!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 05, 2008, 06:44:15 PM
Thinking out loud also. If you were PVDS and a girl was raped and murdered by your son what would you do? Would you be arranging her body to be disposed of in the ocean immediately the first day? That means getting others involved because you dont have a boat and immediately deciding no one can ever find her. Or would you bury her somewhere on land so you can get her away from your property,clean up,get rid of evidence and think about the situation?

All I know is when the Family arrived he had to know they would be scouring the island looking for Natalee. With damning evidence on her body he had to make sure no one would find her. They live on a tiny island surrounded by water. She has to be out there! The whole cremation thing is just so evil,outrageous and hard to believe. Unless it was someone far more powerful than PVDS who arranged burial.IMO



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Magnolia on January 05, 2008, 06:44:24 PM
As far as the Gottenbo's boat being the most likely vessel in disposing of Natalee I agree. What is their part in all of this? Why would Koen hide when Natalee's family drove by his house? Why would Michael Dompig tell Dave that PVDS might have used that boat to dispose of NH? We heard about how nervous koen was and Art Wood begging for him to be questioned about the boat but never was. He also lied about playing tennis with Joran on May 30th why would he lie about that?

From my recollection I believe his Father didn't want him to be questioned again and spoke for him or something. One of the people in the OM I thought even quit over this issue? We also know that Sander said his cell phone was stolen the day Natalee went missing. We know since then they sold there House,Boat and Business and fled to Georgia. While the two boys are most likely in holland.


I think it was the Flanigan woman who quit her job as an assistant prosecutor.
The Gottenbos' boat has been mentioned repeatedly and their actions are more
than suspicious.
Rob said that ALE searched Lorenzo's boat.  How'd they get a search warrant?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: JA on January 05, 2008, 06:49:49 PM
Would you ask a friend of your son's to loan you a boat no questions asked?  Would you go to a friend and tell them you need to borrow their boat...when you probably have never borrowed their boat before?  If your son had used a friend's boat and then told you about it all, would you have the ability to cover it up and keep all involved from talking? How would you do that?  How would you keep the father of the friend from talking?  How would you keep Joran's friends quiet?  How would you stop the snowball effect that would inevitably take place if you could not stop everyone from talking?   Who has the power to make this happen?  I don't suppose I am looking for answers to these questions, instead I am just thinking out loud. 

I agree Lala'sMOm.  It is not like you'd call up at wee hours in the morning or anytime during the day and ask to borrow a boat if you hadn't before.  I also doubt you'd confine in the owner of the boat by telling them you had a body or anything to bury at sea.  If you did borrow the boat, and even at the time you thought it was strange but let the person borrow the boat, you'd think when it became public that Nat was missing, and the JVD had something to do with it, you'd put two and two together.  Somewhere you'd say something to someone like, " I'm I little nervous, Paulus borowed my boat the day after that girl went missing.  Do you think I should say something?"


You are right, someone had the power to keep them quiet.  Unless Joran asked to go out on the boat with Koen or Sander, and then Paulus showed up.  Koen and Sander stupidly agreed to help or let them borrow the boat for this purpose.  When Mr. G got wind of what maybe went down, he knew he had to protect his sons, and didn't want them being questioned.  Someone let him know that if word got out about the use of the boat then it wouldn't be well with his sons, or a blackmail of some business transaction he did in the past.

There has to be more.  If the sentence is so minimum for manslaughter then I can only imagine how short it would be if you "unknowingly" lent your boat to someone for this purpose.  Or would their be any sentence at all?

More has to have been said in the general sector of the population.  How do they keep everything so hush, hush?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: JA on January 05, 2008, 06:54:55 PM
Thinking out loud also. If you were PVDS and a girl was raped and murdered by your son what would you do? Would you be arranging her body to be disposed of in the ocean immediately the first day? That means getting others involved because you dont have a boat and immediately deciding no one can ever find her. Or would you bury her somewhere on land so you can get her away from your property,clean up,get rid of evidence and think about the situation?

All I know is when the Family arrived he had to know they would be scouring the island looking for Natalee. With damning evidence on her body he had to make sure no one would find her. They live on a tiny island surrounded by water. She has to be out there! The whole cremation thing is just so evil,outrageous and hard to believe. Unless it was someone far more powerful than PVDS who arranged burial.IMO



This is exactly why I don't think her remains would ever be on the Sloot property.  People have talked about her being buried in concrete by their pool or in their old well.  I would think they would want to be distanced from her body, so if for some reason she was located before they disposed of her, they would still have a chance to blame it on someone else.  If she was on their property then it would be a little harder to put the blame elsewhere.  I think within the first 48 hours she could have been ont he Sloot property, but once beth was down there and doing her own investigating they knew she had to go.  Plus, unfortunately, I have smelled a dead composing body.  There is no way in that heat that they'd have her on their property for long.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 05, 2008, 06:58:24 PM
How did Rob know Lorenzo's boat was searched? Why would they search his boat and not every other boat on the island?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: JA on January 05, 2008, 06:58:40 PM
Paulus knows the less people involved the better.  This is why I almost agree with those that have the theory that Deepak and Satish know what happened to her, but they don't know exactly where her remains are.  Paulus I'm sure knows many criminals in his line of work ( Yeah ,the ones hired by the gov't too.) and would know which ones if needed he could call in for a favor.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: JA on January 05, 2008, 07:01:44 PM
At one time I thought maybe they had cremated her, because Pauls was so convinced that there would be no body.  But, why would they then be screaming that the Persistence might plant evidence, or Joran's lawyer wanted to make sure if anything was found by the Persistence it could be used?  They'd just laugh that the Persistence was going to all this trouble knowing that nothing would turn up.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: JA on January 05, 2008, 07:03:54 PM
At one time I thought maybe they had cremated her, because Pauls was so convinced that there would be no body.  But, why would they then be screaming that the Persistence might plant evidence, or Joran's lawyer wanted to make sure if anything was found by the Persistence it not could be used?  They'd just laugh that the Persistence was going to all this trouble knowing that nothing would turn up.

OOPs!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 05, 2008, 07:04:36 PM

I think it was the Flanigan woman who quit her job as an assistant prosecutor.
The Gottenbos' boat has been mentioned repeatedly and their actions are more
than suspicious.
Rob said that ALE searched Lorenzo's boat.  How'd they get a search warrant?
Something led them to lorenzo like a tip over the phone or one of the suspects/witnesses and he became a person of interst in the first week MO. From everything that I have read they searched his boat and his mothers house and no forensics were done. Not a clue why they were at her house when he lives in Jaraweg.

They can get search warrants anytime they want and quickly like what we saw with the two security guards. We saw in beths book that the Vader character also said his boat was searched and this was just a few days after NH dissapeared. They could have just asked to look at it,since no forensics were even taken it wasnt a big deal. The Vader guy was prolly a false lead and could have been false tips provided by julia and anita to throw the investigation on a goose chase. We saw how Dennis Jacobs reacted when Beth brought Vader to Dennis Jacobs. The dirty cop probably already searched his boat and knew all about Vader Van Loen and that he wasnt involved. He didn't say squat because he knew that he was a decoy for lorenzo.IMO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 05, 2008, 07:14:30 PM
How did Rob know Lorenzo's boat was searched? Why would they search his boat and not every other boat on the island?

Not sure how Rob knew but Scubajap,Dolores and a few others from Aruba said they searched his boat.

Sounds like they searched Lorenzo's and Van Voons boat but made no attempt on searching the Gottenbo's boat,at least not forensicly? I wonder if they were cleaning the boat with bleach the day the Family saw Koen and his Father cleaning it?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 05, 2008, 07:40:44 PM
I remember Jossy saying that Deepak always became nervous when an ocean search was mentioned.  Surely, he knew she was out deep enough to not be found under normal conditions.  Wonder how many times he's checked in here to see what is going on with the Persistence...I don't think he ever thought about a ship that size.

I also can't see the Gottenbos doing Paulus any favors...I know they say blood is thicker than water but I think that only applies to extremely close relatives.  I know it was rumored they were related, but I don't think Pappa G would lie and get involved in this situation unless there was good reason.  Either he was involved in this elder thing and it's an unwritten code of some kind to help each other or his own sons were so deep in it that he had no choice. 

I admit Shango is intriging, but let's be realistic...it is only an account of what Shango thinks was the standard procedure on the island.  It could be a total fabrication of thoughts pieced together from reading the FP comments up to that point.  Don't believe me?  Then begin at the beginning and you will understand what I mean.  If you don't know anything about Simian or Shango...you can still recognize that you have already read all of it before Shango or Simian showed up by other posters....Aruban posters in fact.

I know not everyone has spent the amount of time I have reading the riddles and following up on various aspects of the stories.  But as Mum mentioned earlier...Shango might be dead.  I have seen all the various theories about Shango...nothing fits precisely into a nice little box where you can tie a ribbon on and give it away as fact. One thing I will say...if Shango is still out there...I am sure he reads here...he has to...we continuously talk about him...how could his ego deny it.  Shango if you are still alive email me cindaol@yahoo.com. Prove to me you exist!!

Simian....I know you are still out there...why won't you speak up?  You don't have to tell anyone but me.  I want some answers.  If you really care anything about Aruba and want to see this nightmare come to an end...start talking to us about the facts.  Tell us what you know.  You both can post on the FP of SM and no one will be able to track you or find you...just give us the info we seek.  One of the two of you most likely know where Natalee is....time to start talking. 

And for all you crazies out there...don't bother trying to impersonate them...I can tell who is real and who is fake...I have my ways.  Who's boat was it?  Who helped Paulus?   How many was it? How far out did they go?  Who needed an alibi?  Why hasn't anyone broken in this case? 

Can you honestly live with yourself the rest of your life knowing that there is someone's child that can't come home to rest?  What if it were your daughter or sister or mother?  Do you have a conscience?  I don't know what else to do but keep begging for someone to talk.  Think of what your own mother and father would feel if this had been you?  Can you live with that for the rest of your life and then take it all to your grave?  I don't think I could.

Okay, rant over.  Sorry, I got carried away.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 05, 2008, 07:43:06 PM
How did Rob know Lorenzo's boat was searched? Why would they search his boat and not every other boat on the island?

Not sure how Rob knew but Scubajap,Dolores and a few others from Aruba said they searched his boat.

Sounds like they searched Lorenzo's and Van Voons boat but made no attempt on searching the Gottenbo's boat,at least not forensicly? I wonder if they were cleaning the boat with bleach the day the Family saw Koen and his Father cleaning it?

When did the family see Koen cleaning the boat?  I missed that one.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 05, 2008, 07:47:05 PM
Strange that there was 2 drug dealers,both dutch,both rumored to be related to the sloots and both had their boats searched.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 05, 2008, 07:53:14 PM
How did Rob know Lorenzo's boat was searched? Why would they search his boat and not every other boat on the island?

When did the family see Koen cleaning the boat?  I missed that one.
I forget who it was,maybee Dave or Jug? He said when he drove by the Gottenbo's home they were inside of the boat cleaning it or something like that. I think he said when he drove by again,koen saw them and ducked/hid under something. I have no idea what the date was when this happened. Someone here probably knows this story better than me  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: texasmom on January 05, 2008, 07:59:12 PM
How did Rob know Lorenzo's boat was searched? Why would they search his boat and not every other boat on the island?

Not sure how Rob knew but Scubajap,Dolores and a few others from Aruba said they searched his boat.

Sounds like they searched Lorenzo's and Van Voons boat but made no attempt on searching the Gottenbo's boat,at least not forensicly? I wonder if they were cleaning the boat with bleach the day the Family saw Koen and his Father cleaning it?

When did the family see Koen cleaning the boat?  I missed that one.

In Dave's book (page 177) he and Art Wood drove by and saw Koen and his father "working on" the boat.  This is the same day that when they drove by slowly again Koen was walking into the living room and when he saw them barrel-rolled and hid behind the couch.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Magnolia on January 05, 2008, 08:04:27 PM
Thinking out loud also. If you were PVDS and a girl was raped and murdered by your son what would you do? Would you be arranging her body to be disposed of in the ocean immediately the first day? That means getting others involved because you dont have a boat and immediately deciding no one can ever find her. Or would you bury her somewhere on land so you can get her away from your property,clean up,get rid of evidence and think about the situation?

All I know is when the Family arrived he had to know they would be scouring the island looking for Natalee. With damning evidence on her body he had to make sure no one would find her. They live on a tiny island surrounded by water. She has to be out there! The whole cremation thing is just so evil,outrageous and hard to believe. Unless it was someone far more powerful than PVDS who arranged burial.IMO



If I had lived on a very small island for as many years as Paulus, I would know that
the only safe place to dispose of a body would be the deep waters of the ocean.
Now depending on whether the rumors of Lorenzo being his son are true....
I would have hidden the body away for a few hours until I could get my wits about me,
then contacted Lorenzo and told him that Joran had gotten himself in a hell of a mess.
IMO Lorenzo would have known exactly what to do and loved doing it if he is as
nutty as everyone says.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 05, 2008, 08:05:40 PM
In Dave's book (page 177) he and Art Wood drove by and saw Koen and his father "working on" the boat.  This is the same day that when they drove by slowly again Koen was walking into the living room and when he saw them barrel-rolled and hid behind the couch.

Thx TM :) Right,how could I forget about koen doing a barrel-roll!!  :2doh:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: yapperz1 on January 05, 2008, 08:11:26 PM
Hiya Monkeys

I know Lorenzo is a bad word here but I found this after the discussion about whether he was related to VDS or not:

http://sundaynightsatellite.libsyn.com/index.php?post_year=2006&post_month=06&post_day=18

<snip>
Dana:

Lorenzo van Rijn, has several homes one was searched the other not. What can you tell us about this guy?

JossY

I do know what our reporters have been able to find, he's a half brother of Joran. He has a boat, he lives in a secluded section of the island, very close to Joran. I don't know if he was questioned ... but ppl mention his name quite often in regard to this case.
 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: bleachedblack on January 05, 2008, 08:20:01 PM
Yapperz I for one remember hearing that fact from very very early in the case, before the "mis-information"  even began. I believe I see a familial resemblance between LVR PVDS and JVDS.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Kat_Gram on January 05, 2008, 08:29:06 PM
If you were PVDS, with a son that you doted on and he came to you and told you that :
He met a girl, a wild American girl who had been drinking heavy and doing drugs and while you were with her, she just expired, probably from the drink and the drugs she had been consuming way before she ran into you and you had panicked and just left her under some brush on the beach and said: What should you do ?
And your Dad said :Who knows about this ? And the answer was : Deepak and Satish, it wasn't like a date, it was just one of THOSE girls.
And you three had been too panicked to call the police or call 911 at the time,
so how could you now.
You Dad says, get rid of her, No body , No case, Case closed.
..
Your Dad thinks, I will do anything for my son, the sun shines out of his azz.
And your Mother says : My son is a Delicious Sporter, he did nothing wrong, except he left a girl at the beach.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 05, 2008, 08:30:36 PM
Hiya Monkeys

I know Lorenzo is a bad word here but I found this after the discussion about whether he was related to VDS or not:

http://sundaynightsatellite.libsyn.com/index.php?post_year=2006&post_month=06&post_day=18

<snip>
Dana:

Lorenzo van Rijn, has several homes one was searched the other not. What can you tell us about this guy?

JossY

I do know what our reporters have been able to find, he's a half brother of Joran. He has a boat, he lives in a secluded section of the island, very close to Joran. I don't know if he was questioned ... but ppl mention his name quite often in regard to this case.
 

Then five days later Jossy backtracked ... I wonder why?

Janet

++++++++++++++


Jossy Mansur
DANA PRETZER
June 18, 2007

MANSUR:  I do know what our reporters have been able to find, he's a half brother of Joran. He has a boat. He lives in a secluded section of the island, very close to Joran. I don't know if he was questioned, but people mention his name quite often in regard to this case.
 

Jossy Mansur
DANA PRETZER SHOW
June 23, 2007


MANSUR:  You know, as far as we know, no, we haven't been able to make that kind of a link or connection whatsoever with regard to the case. I mean the rumours are more than rumours in Aruba that they are half brothers and they have the same appearance, they have the same height, same (inaudible), there are many reasons to believe that but it has not been confirmed by themselves, the two players themselves or anyone else in the family, no


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: greeneyedlady on January 05, 2008, 08:32:33 PM
Yapperz I for one remember hearing that fact from very very early in the case, before the "mis-information"  even began. I believe I see a familial resemblance between LVR PVDS and JVDS.


bleached. glad I'm not the only one who sees the family resemblance between those 3. :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: texasmom on January 05, 2008, 08:35:36 PM
Has anyone determined if the Gottenbos' and Vandersloots are related?  I read somewhere last night that the boys were Joran's cousins from Anita's side of the family. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 05, 2008, 08:35:51 PM
Hiya Monkeys

I know Lorenzo is a bad word here but I found this after the discussion about whether he was related to VDS or not:

http://sundaynightsatellite.libsyn.com/index.php?post_year=2006&post_month=06&post_day=18

<snip>
Dana:

Lorenzo van Rijn, has several homes one was searched the other not. What can you tell us about this guy?

JossY

I do know what our reporters have been able to find, he's a half brother of Joran. He has a boat, he lives in a secluded section of the island, very close to Joran. I don't know if he was questioned ... but ppl mention his name quite often in regard to this case.
 

Then five days later Jossy backtracked ... I wonder why?

Janet

++++++++++++++


Jossy Mansur
DANA PRETZER
June 18, 2007

MANSUR:  I do know what our reporters have been able to find, he's a half brother of Joran. He has a boat. He lives in a secluded section of the island, very close to Joran. I don't know if he was questioned, but people mention his name quite often in regard to this case.
 

Jossy Mansur
DANA PRETZER SHOW
June 23, 2007


MANSUR:  You know, as far as we know, no, we haven't been able to make that kind of a link or connection whatsoever with regard to the case. I mean the rumours are more than rumours in Aruba that they are half brothers and they have the same appearance, they have the same height, same (inaudible), there are many reasons to believe that but it has not been confirmed by themselves, the two players themselves or anyone else in the family, no


Because I believe Jossy was answering regarding the drug bust.  I think Jossy was saying Lorenzo's arrest in the drug bust had nothing to do with the NH case.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: bleachedblack on January 05, 2008, 08:36:24 PM
Hiya Monkeys

I know Lorenzo is a bad word here but I found this after the discussion about whether he was related to VDS or not:

http://sundaynightsatellite.libsyn.com/index.php?post_year=2006&post_month=06&post_day=18

<snip>
Dana:

Lorenzo van Rijn, has several homes one was searched the other not. What can you tell us about this guy?

JossY

I do know what our reporters have been able to find, he's a half brother of Joran. He has a boat, he lives in a secluded section of the island, very close to Joran. I don't know if he was questioned ... but ppl mention his name quite often in regard to this case.
 

Then five days later Jossy backtracked ... I wonder why?

Janet

++++++++++++++


Jossy Mansur
DANA PRETZER
June 18, 2007

MANSUR:  I do know what our reporters have been able to find, he's a half brother of Joran. He has a boat. He lives in a secluded section of the island, very close to Joran. I don't know if he was questioned, but people mention his name quite often in regard to this case.
 

Jossy Mansur
DANA PRETZER SHOW
June 23, 2007


MANSUR:  You know, as far as we know, no, we haven't been able to make that kind of a link or connection whatsoever with regard to the case. I mean the rumours are more than rumours in Aruba that they are half brothers and they have the same appearance, they have the same height, same (inaudible), there are many reasons to believe that but it has not been confirmed by themselves, the two players themselves or anyone else in the family, no


Threat of lawsuit by PVDS? ...would be my guess.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 05, 2008, 08:39:02 PM
Hi Yap,

He's a 28 year old guy and I do not think he would be close to Joran unless he was related or the families were close in some way. Now it just comes down to is he involved and in what way? If he was involved in the disposal then did he use his boat or did he involve his colombian contacts that TJ talked about PVDS having?

ON THE MORNING OF MAY 30, 2005 ... THERE IS A RUMORED 6:30 AM CALL FROM ONE OF THE SUSPECTS CELL IN THE SANTA LUCIA AREA OF THE ISLAND AND ... JORAN IS ALLEGEDLY PICKED UP BY THE SCHOOL BUS NEAR THE HOME OF LORENZO VAN RIJN. TJ Ward had told us that Lorenzo had armed Colombian guards at his house when he went to talk to him.

Jossy Mansur
DANA PRETZER SHOW
June 23, 2007

MANSUR:  You know, as far as we know, no, we haven't been able to make that kind of a link or connection whatsoever with regard to the case. I mean the rumours are more than rumours in Aruba that they are half brothers and they have the same appearance, they have the same height, same (inaudible), there are many reasons to believe that but it has not been confirmed by themselves, the two players themselves or anyone else in the family, no
----------------------------------
Dave Holloway
Question and Answer Chat - BFN
January 23, 2006

14. Why was the school bus driver called the next morning and told to pick up Joran at Lorenzo's house?
 
DAVE: Joran was allegedly dropped off at a bus stop on the main highway. The bus driver had not made it there yet and saved Paulus about 30 minutes. Lorenzo's house was nearby.
http://blogsfornatalee.com/forum/index.php?topic=2256.0
-----------------------------------



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 05, 2008, 08:39:33 PM
A reliable friend sent me this a few hours ago...thought you might find this interesting.  I have read it before, but what the heck...let's read it again.

OK I know most of the so called psychics are never accurate about Natalee's case.
However, look at this map of Renaissance Island:
 
http://hotels.about.com/od/aruba/ig/Pictures-of-Renaissance-Aruba/Map-of-the-Renaissance-Aruba.htm
 
Note the left part of the island has 9 trees drawn on it.
 
Then read this couple's review of Renaissance Island
 
 
http://www.aruba-travelguide.com/hotels/read_review.html?REVIEW_ID=288
 
<snip>
A little side note also, on the adult side (right side-with Flamingo's) off to the far right point, which you can walk out to--about 20-30 yards directly off the point is a sunken ship! Most people didn't even know this, however my wife and I ventured out and found it after reading extensive reviews all over the web. It's really cool and there are tons of fish. There's a part of the boat that is parallel with the water, and you can actually stand up on it as it's only about 2 feet under water! (this is about 30 yards out, so it looks very cool from the beach) The ship was about 100 yards or more long, and there are octopus, Morray eels etc.
 
I know it sounds crazy but what better place to hide a body than in plain view at a ship wreck? Most people are busy looking at the fish etc & not at what may be hidden inside the sunken ship. I know there are a lot of wrecks around Aruba & so would the locals.
 

 
 
 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: yapperz1 on January 05, 2008, 08:43:47 PM
Janet, the post I made was from a Dana Pretzer show in 2006. Jossy was talking about Natalee's case then. I do believe he had reporters who confirmed the kinship. I too think Lorenzo is a 1/2 brother to goon child & has a bigger role in Natalee's case than we know. MOO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 05, 2008, 08:48:09 PM
Yapperz I for one remember hearing that fact from very very early in the case, before the "mis-information"  even began. I believe I see a familial resemblance between LVR PVDS and JVDS.
BB,I remember interviews in Aruba on TV with one or two locals who mentioned this crazy guy with a tricked out colored van and a spray painted house even before the security guards were arrested.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: yapperz1 on January 05, 2008, 08:57:21 PM
*******..I have never been able to rule Lorenzo out of the equation due to the fact that his name was mentioned very early on by Aruban people on tv as well as Aruban bloggers b4 the misinformation comittee was assembled.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 05, 2008, 08:59:45 PM
Well, if we are  going to discuss Lorenzo then I also think we need to discuss the 5th suspect again.  I can't seem to get Colombo to respond to me in Shango so maybe I can here....I want to know if he and his buddy Eleye still think the 5th suspect is Paulus?  That was a theory they put out there one night that sent this place into a frenzy.  I still would like to discuss it.  As I said if Lorenzo is not involved how do you explain the comment about the phone call and the bus near Lorenzo's?  Does Steve Croes work for the local drug supplier?  I think supplier is a better word for Lorenzo than dealer.  He has parties and they are what local Arubans have termed raves.  So I see him as more of a player on the big stage than menial tasks such as just dealing drugs.  He lives well, so he has a source.  With those kinds of tastes his inheritance would be dwindling down to nothing soon. OK, call me crazy, but that's what I am thinking today... at this moment.  :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: hotping on January 05, 2008, 09:09:54 PM
A reliable friend sent me this a few hours ago...thought you might find this interesting.  I have read it before, but what the heck...let's read it again.

OK I know most of the so called psychics are never accurate about Natalee's case.
However, look at this map of Renaissance Island:
 
http://hotels.about.com/od/aruba/ig/Pictures-of-Renaissance-Aruba/Map-of-the-Renaissance-Aruba.htm
 
Note the left part of the island has 9 trees drawn on it.
 
Then read this couple's review of Renaissance Island
 
 
http://www.aruba-travelguide.com/hotels/read_review.html?REVIEW_ID=288
 
<snip>
A little side note also, on the adult side (right side-with Flamingo's) off to the far right point, which you can walk out to--about 20-30 yards directly off the point is a sunken ship! Most people didn't even know this, however my wife and I ventured out and found it after reading extensive reviews all over the web. It's really cool and there are tons of fish. There's a part of the boat that is parallel with the water, and you can actually stand up on it as it's only about 2 feet under water! (this is about 30 yards out, so it looks very cool from the beach) The ship was about 100 yards or more long, and there are octopus, Morray eels etc.
 
I know it sounds crazy but what better place to hide a body than in plain view at a ship wreck? Most people are busy looking at the fish etc & not at what may be hidden inside the sunken ship. I know there are a lot of wrecks around Aruba & so would the locals.
 

 
 
 

Very Interesting! I hope Someone checks it out....Are any of the suspects or Their friends scubadivers???


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 05, 2008, 09:27:56 PM
I know that Valentijn was certified in scuba and I'm assuming Joran was as well.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Magnolia on January 05, 2008, 09:31:22 PM
I know that Valentijn was certified in scuba and I'm assuming Joran was as well.

I remember Dompig saying that one of the Kalpoes was a scuba diver.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: hotping on January 05, 2008, 09:35:35 PM
A reliable friend sent me this a few hours ago...thought you might find this interesting.  I have read it before, but what the heck...let's read it again.

OK I know most of the so called psychics are never accurate about Natalee's case.
However, look at this map of Renaissance Island:
 
http://hotels.about.com/od/aruba/ig/Pictures-of-Renaissance-Aruba/Map-of-the-Renaissance-Aruba.htm
 
Note the left part of the island has 9 trees drawn on it.
 
Then read this couple's review of Renaissance Island
 
 
http://www.aruba-travelguide.com/hotels/read_review.html?REVIEW_ID=288
 
<snip>
A little side note also, on the adult side (right side-with Flamingo's) off to the far right point, which you can walk out to--about 20-30 yards directly off the point is a sunken ship! Most people didn't even know this, however my wife and I ventured out and found it after reading extensive reviews all over the web. It's really cool and there are tons of fish. There's a part of the boat that is parallel with the water, and you can actually stand up on it as it's only about 2 feet under water! (this is about 30 yards out, so it looks very cool from the beach) The ship was about 100 yards or more long, and there are octopus, Morray eels etc.
 
I know it sounds crazy but what better place to hide a body than in plain view at a ship wreck? Most people are busy looking at the fish etc & not at what may be hidden inside the sunken ship. I know there are a lot of wrecks around Aruba & so would the locals.
 

 
 
 

Lala's maybe it wouldn't hurt to put this in the Ocean Search thread for the Persistence Crew to see.....and also let them know that there are several people who are scuba divers....MOO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Hotshot on January 05, 2008, 10:06:13 PM
*******,  you just said this.....

ON THE MORNING OF MAY 30, 2005 ... THERE IS A RUMORED 6:30 AM CALL FROM ONE OF THE SUSPECTS CELL IN THE SANTA LUCIA AREA OF THE ISLAND AND ... JORAN IS ALLEGEDLY PICKED UP BY THE SCHOOL BUS NEAR THE HOME OF LORENZO VAN RIJN. TJ Ward had told us that Lorenzo had armed Colombian guards at his house when he went to talk to him.

I went to an old aruban map the other day to look for Sant Lucia, and it is out by the old "Natural Bridge".  So Thats why I don't understand the phone call. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 05, 2008, 10:26:05 PM
*******,  you just said this.....

ON THE MORNING OF MAY 30, 2005 ... THERE IS A RUMORED 6:30 AM CALL FROM ONE OF THE SUSPECTS CELL IN THE SANTA LUCIA AREA OF THE ISLAND AND ... JORAN IS ALLEGEDLY PICKED UP BY THE SCHOOL BUS NEAR THE HOME OF LORENZO VAN RIJN. TJ Ward had told us that Lorenzo had armed Colombian guards at his house when he went to talk to him.

I went to an old aruban map the other day to look for Sant Lucia, and it is out by the old "Natural Bridge".  So Thats why I don't understand the phone call. 

Correct, Santa Lucia is where the Donkey Sanctuary is which is nearer to the original Natural Bridge.  Also on the same side of the island that the piece of fabric matching Natalee's top was picked up.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 05, 2008, 10:29:23 PM
*******,  you just said this.....

ON THE MORNING OF MAY 30, 2005 ... THERE IS A RUMORED 6:30 AM CALL FROM ONE OF THE SUSPECTS CELL IN THE SANTA LUCIA AREA OF THE ISLAND AND ... JORAN IS ALLEGEDLY PICKED UP BY THE SCHOOL BUS NEAR THE HOME OF LORENZO VAN RIJN. TJ Ward had told us that Lorenzo had armed Colombian guards at his house when he went to talk to him.

I went to an old aruban map the other day to look for Sant Lucia, and it is out by the old "Natural Bridge".  So Thats why I don't understand the phone call. 

I copied that particular post because it was by the Jossy quote made by Janet. I'M not sure where that call was made or sent to,I have seen Santa Cruz and southern part of the island as well.  If the call was by the old bridge then that would be in a totally different part of the island.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Hotshot on January 05, 2008, 10:37:51 PM
*******,  you just said this.....

ON THE MORNING OF MAY 30, 2005 ... THERE IS A RUMORED 6:30 AM CALL FROM ONE OF THE SUSPECTS CELL IN THE SANTA LUCIA AREA OF THE ISLAND AND ... JORAN IS ALLEGEDLY PICKED UP BY THE SCHOOL BUS NEAR THE HOME OF LORENZO VAN RIJN. TJ Ward had told us that Lorenzo had armed Colombian guards at his house when he went to talk to him.

I went to an old aruban map the other day to look for Sant Lucia, and it is out by the old "Natural Bridge".  So Thats why I don't understand the phone call. 

I copied that particular post because it was by the Jossy quote made by Janet. I'M not sure where that call was made or sent to,I have seen Santa Cruz and southern part of the island as well.  If the call was by the old bridge then that would be in a totally different part of the island.
Right, thats what I mean.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Hotshot on January 05, 2008, 10:44:22 PM
I just found an awsome map but I have to piece it together to make it veiwable.  I'll be back when I get it done.  an hour or so.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 05, 2008, 10:45:45 PM
I just found an awsome map but I have to piece it together to make it veiwable.  I'll be back when I get it done.  an hour or so.

OK..or you can upload it as is into photobucket and just post the link.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 05, 2008, 10:51:37 PM
Janet, the post I made was from a Dana Pretzer show in 2006. Jossy was talking about Natalee's case then. I do believe he had reporters who confirmed the kinship. I too think Lorenzo is a 1/2 brother to goon child & has a bigger role in Natalee's case than we know. MOO

Yapper ... thank you for pointing out that I had the year wrong on that quote.

I believe that Jossy spoke the truth regarding Lorenzo's relationship with Paulus/Joran.  However ... I wonder if intimidation was the reason he back tracked.

Janet.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: AZSunny on January 05, 2008, 11:23:03 PM
A reliable friend sent me this a few hours ago...thought you might find this interesting.  I have read it before, but what the heck...let's read it again.

OK I know most of the so called psychics are never accurate about Natalee's case.
However, look at this map of Renaissance Island:
 
http://hotels.about.com/od/aruba/ig/Pictures-of-Renaissance-Aruba/Map-of-the-Renaissance-Aruba.htm
 
Note the left part of the island has 9 trees drawn on it.
 
Then read this couple's review of Renaissance Island
 
 
http://www.aruba-travelguide.com/hotels/read_review.html?REVIEW_ID=288
 
<snip>
A little side note also, on the adult side (right side-with Flamingo's) off to the far right point, which you can walk out to--about 20-30 yards directly off the point is a sunken ship! Most people didn't even know this, however my wife and I ventured out and found it after reading extensive reviews all over the web. It's really cool and there are tons of fish. There's a part of the boat that is parallel with the water, and you can actually stand up on it as it's only about 2 feet under water! (this is about 30 yards out, so it looks very cool from the beach) The ship was about 100 yards or more long, and there are octopus, Morray eels etc.
 
I know it sounds crazy but what better place to hide a body than in plain view at a ship wreck? Most people are busy looking at the fish etc & not at what may be hidden inside the sunken ship. I know there are a lot of wrecks around Aruba & so would the locals.
 

 
 
 

Lala's maybe it wouldn't hurt to put this in the Ocean Search thread for the Persistence Crew to see.....and also let them know that there are several people who are scuba divers....MOO

"In plain view"


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: hotping on January 05, 2008, 11:28:42 PM
A reliable friend sent me this a few hours ago...thought you might find this interesting.  I have read it before, but what the heck...let's read it again.

OK I know most of the so called psychics are never accurate about Natalee's case.
However, look at this map of Renaissance Island:
 
http://hotels.about.com/od/aruba/ig/Pictures-of-Renaissance-Aruba/Map-of-the-Renaissance-Aruba.htm
 
Note the left part of the island has 9 trees drawn on it.
 
Then read this couple's review of Renaissance Island
 
 
http://www.aruba-travelguide.com/hotels/read_review.html?REVIEW_ID=288
 
<snip>
A little side note also, on the adult side (right side-with Flamingo's) off to the far right point, which you can walk out to--about 20-30 yards directly off the point is a sunken ship! Most people didn't even know this, however my wife and I ventured out and found it after reading extensive reviews all over the web. It's really cool and there are tons of fish. There's a part of the boat that is parallel with the water, and you can actually stand up on it as it's only about 2 feet under water! (this is about 30 yards out, so it looks very cool from the beach) The ship was about 100 yards or more long, and there are octopus, Morray eels etc.
 
I know it sounds crazy but what better place to hide a body than in plain view at a ship wreck? Most people are busy looking at the fish etc & not at what may be hidden inside the sunken ship. I know there are a lot of wrecks around Aruba & so would the locals.
 

 
 
 

Lala's maybe it wouldn't hurt to put this in the Ocean Search thread for the Persistence Crew to see.....and also let them know that there are several people who are scuba divers....MOO

"In plain view"
AZSUNNY is "In Plain View" A Quote from a Shango Clue???


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Kat_Gram on January 05, 2008, 11:32:43 PM
Hello Janet... Did you see who won the Hockey ?
Oh Canada Our Home and Native Land ! !
I almost stood up and sang !
Junior Hockey is way better than regular hockey, those boys have heart ! 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 05, 2008, 11:33:25 PM
Right Sunny...In plain view...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: robots on January 05, 2008, 11:38:06 PM
the Sloot car was used that night  :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: San on January 05, 2008, 11:43:14 PM
the Sloot car was used that night  :cool:


I agree  :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Kat_Gram on January 05, 2008, 11:45:57 PM
Has anyone ever tried asking Lorenzo directly IF he is related to the Sloots ?
If I had his phone number, I would call and get this over with. Although, I only speak English.   


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: robots on January 05, 2008, 11:50:47 PM
the Sloot car was used that night  :cool:


I agree  :cool:
:wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 05, 2008, 11:51:43 PM
Has anyone ever tried asking Lorenzo directly IF he is related to the Sloots ?
If I had his phone number, I would call and get this over with. Although, I only speak English.   

#1  And you think you'ld get an honest answer?
#2  My bet is he speaks and understands English just fine


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 05, 2008, 11:56:36 PM
Has anyone ever tried asking Lorenzo directly IF he is related to the Sloots ?
If I had his phone number, I would call and get this over with. Although, I only speak English.   


LOL


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: texasmom on January 05, 2008, 11:56:45 PM
Not sure if this is what you mean by in plain view?  I spotted these two possibilities in the riddle, I'm still looking to make sure I didn't miss another.

Dave's Book pg 220:

Shango; Threadsurfers! What is sought is not hidden.
Possible translation; (Bloggers, the answer is out in the open)


Dave's Book pg 221

Shango; If the head of the beast is in plain view it is folly to attack protected flanks.
Possible translation; (The true criminal is out in the open while we are going after those who are protected)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 06, 2008, 12:02:05 AM
the Sloot car was used that night  :cool:

Simian Says:June 25th, 2005 at 6:47 pm
There are 3 vehicles.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Hotshot on January 06, 2008, 12:02:16 AM
(http://i10.photobucket.com/albums/a118/kath8700/arubamapforklaas.jpg)

Heres a good one also

http://i10.photobucket.com/albums/a118/kath8700/arubaattmap1.gif


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Kat_Gram on January 06, 2008, 12:05:39 AM
Has anyone ever tried asking Lorenzo directly IF he is related to the Sloots ?
If I had his phone number, I would call and get this over with. Although, I only speak English.   


LOL
sssorry, eye  mus be drunk ROFL ...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: robots on January 06, 2008, 12:08:19 AM
the Sloot car was used that night  :cool:

Simian Says:June 25th, 2005 at 6:47 pm
There are 3 vehicles.

:cool: :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 06, 2008, 12:09:56 AM
(http://i10.photobucket.com/albums/a118/kath8700/arubamapforklaas.jpg)

Heres a good one also

http://i10.photobucket.com/albums/a118/kath8700/arubaattmap1.gif

The island is so small no portion of it is out of the quesiton.  Thanks for the maps.  I hadn't seen this one.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 06, 2008, 12:11:21 AM
the Sloot car was used that night  :cool:

Simian Says:June 25th, 2005 at 6:47 pm
There are 3 vehicles.

:cool: :wink:

Yes but IMO Simian was talking about the 3 vehicles that were impounded..Deepaks, and the 2 Sloot cars.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Silverfox on January 06, 2008, 12:13:01 AM
Not sure if this is what you mean by in plain view?  I spotted these two possibilities in the riddle, I'm still looking to make sure I didn't miss another.

Dave's Book pg 220:

Shango; Threadsurfers! What is sought is not hidden.
Possible translation; (Bloggers, the answer is out in the open)


Dave's Book pg 221

Shango; If the head of the beast is in plain view it is folly to attack protected flanks.
Possible translation; (The true criminal is out in the open while we are going after those who are protected)


(http://i195.photobucket.com/albums/z215/kickradio/th_vacation.jpg) (http://s195.photobucket.com/albums/z215/kickradio/?action=view&current=29adf4c5.pbw)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Kat_Gram on January 06, 2008, 12:13:40 AM
Ty for the maps Hotshot. I saved them so I could zoom in.
What do you think in respect to Kyle's question ?
I know that you have put more time and effort into this than me.
And done the first hand research.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Hotshot on January 06, 2008, 12:14:23 AM
Your welcome.  its the first time I have seen this map also.  They were all over the Island that night!  Not like its all that big either.  Klaas, go ahead and add to it if you wish.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Hotshot on January 06, 2008, 12:16:15 AM
Ty for the maps Hotshot. I saved them so I could zoom in.
What do you think in respect to Kyle's question ?
I know that you have put more time and effort into this than me.
And done the first hand research.

I have done alot of research, but everyone here really has.  What was Kyles question?

Oh BTW Lorenzo doesnt have a number,skype,messenger, nada!!!  Been there already, LOLOL


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Magnolia on January 06, 2008, 12:21:30 AM
Looking at Hotshot's map....it would have been so
easy to put in right there close to the Gottenbos'
house and go straight out to the deep water.
There would be no reason to go to the public
marina near the Marriott and the Raquet Club.
Isn't that sort of the area that the Persistence is
searching?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 06, 2008, 12:29:09 AM
Ty for the maps Hotshot. I saved them so I could zoom in.
What do you think in respect to Kyle's question ?
I know that you have put more time and effort into this than me.
And done the first hand research.

I have done alot of research, but everyone here really has.  What was Kyles question?

Oh BTW Lorenzo doesnt have a number,skype,messenger, nada!!!  Been there already, LOLOL

You can email dolores from RWV(I have her email)..She has Lorenzo's number  :wink: But she says he's not related or involved  :roll:

Kat:

Go Canada!!  :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Kat_Gram on January 06, 2008, 12:29:28 AM
Looking at Hotshot's map....it would have been so
easy to put in right there close to the Gottenbos'
house and go straight out to the deep water.
There would be no reason to go to the public
marina near the Marriott and the Raquet Club.
Isn't that sort of the area that the Persistence is
searching?
I doubt if they went to anywhere public. The spot marked where Deepak relieved his bladder looks like a likely spot.
The place is so small, it doesn't take long to get from any location to another.
Eye m not really drunk. Just tired and goofy as usual.
 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 06, 2008, 12:30:48 AM
Looking at Hotshot's map....it would have been so
easy to put in right there close to the Gottenbos'
house and go straight out to the deep water.
There would be no reason to go to the public
marina near the Marriott and the Raquet Club.
Isn't that sort of the area that the Persistence is
searching?

Exactly.  Yes, I believe that's one of the areas Persistence is searching.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Hotshot on January 06, 2008, 12:30:58 AM
Looking at Hotshot's map....it would have been so
easy to put in right there close to the Gottenbos'
house and go straight out to the deep water.
There would be no reason to go to the public
marina near the Marriott and the Raquet Club.
Isn't that sort of the area that the Persistence is
searching?
Yes, it is.

*******, can you email me her email?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 06, 2008, 12:32:24 AM

Yes, it is.

*******, can you email me her email?

Ok..I will..Also on that Map we need to put a X where that VCB shirt was found


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Hotshot on January 06, 2008, 12:33:53 AM

Yes, it is.

*******, can you email me her email?

Ok..I will..Also on that Map we need to put a X where that VCB shirt was found
I did, wasnt it where the matress was found?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Kat_Gram on January 06, 2008, 12:34:07 AM
I was not serious about phoning Lorenzo. It wouldn't cost that much, because he would just hang up on some goofy woman calling him from Canada, Hockey Land and asking Who is your Daddy, no, I am not with the Montel Show, I am taking a survey. Got spliff ? Mon ?   


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 06, 2008, 12:35:17 AM
(http://i10.photobucket.com/albums/a118/kath8700/arubamapforklaas.jpg)

Heres a good one also

http://i10.photobucket.com/albums/a118/kath8700/arubaattmap1.gif

The island is so small no portion of it is out of the quesiton.  Thanks for the maps.  I hadn't seen this one.



Seeing this made me think of this...

Merian Ernest Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2005 5:51 pm Post subject: They call him bifrons...
Find Aruba. Find the Haystack. Find Santa Marta. Trace with your finger what the Antenna
has spoken about.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Hotshot on January 06, 2008, 12:37:13 AM
X. Persistence
 
Update: 05-Jan-1610 hrs
The Persistence arrived dockside at 0500 hrs after a long night offshore. A few hours sitting still at the dock is revitalizing for a few of the beleaguered crew. Outside, the winds are unrelenting and whip the sea into angry white caps which crash onto the protective reef skirting the harbor. Even the heartiest seabirds have taken cover. The tourist submersible Atlantis II cancels its evening tour in lieu of being forced backwards by the driving currents. Inside, the Persistence is bustling with the daily chores of living on board a boat. With a whistle and a rumble, the twin Diesels comes alive without complaint. Once they’re warm, the lines are tossed and we’re off.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Hotshot on January 06, 2008, 12:39:18 AM
(http://i10.photobucket.com/albums/a118/kath8700/arubamapforklaas.jpg)

Heres a good one also

http://i10.photobucket.com/albums/a118/kath8700/arubaattmap1.gif

The island is so small no portion of it is out of the quesiton.  Thanks for the maps.  I hadn't seen this one.



Seeing this made me think of this...

Merian Ernest Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2005 5:51 pm Post subject: They call him bifrons...
Find Aruba. Find the Haystack. Find Santa Marta. Trace with your finger what the Antenna
has spoken about.

Lalas, thats what I have been trying to tell Kyle. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Magnolia on January 06, 2008, 12:43:17 AM
X. Persistence
 
Update: 05-Jan-1610 hrs
The Persistence arrived dockside at 0500 hrs after a long night offshore. A few hours sitting still at the dock is revitalizing for a few of the beleaguered crew. Outside, the winds are unrelenting and whip the sea into angry white caps which crash onto the protective reef skirting the harbor. Even the heartiest seabirds have taken cover. The tourist submersible Atlantis II cancels its evening tour in lieu of being forced backwards by the driving currents. Inside, the Persistence is bustling with the daily chores of living on board a boat. With a whistle and a rumble, the twin Diesels comes alive without complaint. Once they’re warm, the lines are tossed and we’re off.


They should call Renfro to do their laundry. :lol:   
She has never quit bitching about doing laundry for TES.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Hotshot on January 06, 2008, 12:48:51 AM
(http://i10.photobucket.com/albums/a118/kath8700/santamarta.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 06, 2008, 12:53:22 AM
Ty for the maps Hotshot. I saved them so I could zoom in.
What do you think in respect to Kyle's question ?
I know that you have put more time and effort into this than me.
And done the first hand research.

I have done alot of research, but everyone here really has.  What was Kyles question?

Oh BTW Lorenzo doesnt have a number,skype,messenger, nada!!!  Been there already, LOLOL

You can email dolores from RWV(I have her email)..She has Lorenzo's number  :wink: But she says he's not related or involved  :roll:

Kat:

Go Canada!!  :cool:

You don't suppose Dolores' middle name is.......oh never mind.  :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Kat_Gram on January 06, 2008, 12:56:11 AM
Kyle writes like a much older person than he is.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 06, 2008, 01:03:04 AM

Yes, it is.

*******, can you email me her email?

Ok..I will..Also on that Map we need to put a X where that VCB shirt was found
I did, wasnt it where the matress was found?

Nope,the Mattress was found at Grapefield Beach and the VCB shirt and other items were found in the colony area the next day,pretty close in location though.

http://i198.photobucket.com/albums/aa118/Observer00000007/Evidencefoundincolony.jpg
(http://img153.imageshack.us/img153/1290/aruba20colony20areasmalnv7.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 06, 2008, 01:21:19 AM
Where was the shallow grave found by TES? When I watched the news video they said it was by the national park..I am presuming that is the Arikok Park  by that Santa Lucia area?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Hotshot on January 06, 2008, 01:22:27 AM
OK, I am going to let Klaas fix that then.  I am beat, and am going to bed....
Yes Kyle does write older then what he is.  Hey *******, guess whos in town?  Flew in from denver tonight.  OK, good night all.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 06, 2008, 01:22:50 AM
Hotshot
I found an old post the other day talking about boats leaving from certain areas were not seen on radar.  I can't seem to find it now.  I thought about Lorenzo's boat then...who's to say that he didn't loan a boat to Paulus that night or maybe even Steve Croes.  Why would you do anything that you normally do right after you found out your son had a dead girl on his hands?  I just don't think she was disposed of in a hurry...this was planned out in some way.  If Joran and Deepak just got rid of her then I could believe they dumped her out from where the Gottnebos boat was. It would be easier. I don't think Deepak was involved in her disposal.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 06, 2008, 01:40:35 AM
Does anyone know if Astrid van Rijn worked anywhere?   What did she do all day in that big house?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Magnolia on January 06, 2008, 01:43:20 AM
Hotshot
I found an old post the other day talking about boats leaving from certain areas were not seen on radar.  I can't seem to find it now.  I thought about Lorenzo's boat then...who's to say that he didn't loan a boat to Paulus that night or maybe even Steve Croes.  Why would you do anything that you normally do right after you found out your son had a dead girl on his hands?  I just don't think she was disposed of in a hurry...this was planned out in some way.  If Joran and Deepak just got rid of her then I could believe they dumped her out from where the Gottnebos boat was. It would be easier. I don't think Deepak was involved in her disposal.

I would be willing to bet that Lorenzo wouldn't lend that Cigerette to anybody,
even if Paulus was his father.  He would only run it himself. 
Plus Cigerettes are really loud. Usually 4 / 250hp engines.
I really don't believe that the radar they have picks up small boats other than
a dot on a screen, if that.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 06, 2008, 02:02:27 AM
Does anyone know if Astrid van Rijn worked anywhere?   What did she do all day in that big house?
I was just thinking earlier why her house was searched and not Lorenzos. After Paul VR died they apparently sold the car dealership and other businesses and were living off that. All we know about Lorenzo is he grows over 100 plants of MJ at a time,rumored to be the xtasy supplier on the island and had colombian guards.

Astrid most likely has some sort of a proffession. I see there are a at least two Astrid Van Rijn's in Holland. I dont think this is her as she was living in Aruba. http://www.linkedin.com/pub/0/667/749

Maybee she own this store called Astrid's Goodies?

http://www.marktplaza.nl/De-dochter-des-huizes-Catherine-Cookson-3652010.php


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Silverfox on January 06, 2008, 02:05:24 AM
One thing that amazes me is the attitude of the government on that "little" island.

First of all they want sovereign status...to be treated like any other "country" with same rights and privs and status...

But the population of this "country" is only 71,566. 

From this population base they feel they can thumb their nose at the U.S.

Imagine that.

Consider this:  The closest "City" in the U.S. that compares in size to Aruba is New Britain, Florida with a population of 71,538 and ranked #374.

That helps put in perspective the "size and population relevance".



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 06, 2008, 02:18:21 AM
Hotshot

I would be willing to bet that Lorenzo wouldn't lend that Cigerette to anybody,
even if Paulus was his father.  He would only run it himself. 
Plus Cigerettes are really loud. Usually 4 / 250hp engines.
I really don't believe that the radar they have picks up small boats other than
a dot on a screen, if that.
Interview with Lt Rudy Soemers
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8SzUfdbGWps

I think the whole radar thing is BS. According to LT Rudy Soemers you can easily reach Point Escondido in less than a hour with a good speed boat. They have problems with illegals,,etc. If she wanted to leave Aruba it is easy to leave he says. If it's that easy for Natalee to run away to Venezuela then it would be even easier to dump her body in 300-800 foot waters off of the Aruba coast


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: sirensong on January 06, 2008, 02:58:46 AM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub2/cartoonnatalee.jpg)
Even the "angel" looks like Anita!
look at the bottom right -- an arrow down to "a drink within a drink". At 6-5-05 these "theories"  were simply not out there yet.

Those theories were not out in the public yet.  The parents were searching crack houses, etc.

There would have to be time for the movement of information from witnesses, and the creation of the cartoon. 

Perhaps Natalee's remains were found by authorities as early as day two (Monday or Tuesday).  Keeping them would have certainly answered some questions.  I don't think the story developed as some thought. 

I wonder how many witnesses there are?

Where was the cartoon published?



(http://i103.photobucket.com/albums/m153/CMPM/cartoonist.jpg)
Anthony Diberardo


About the Cartoonist:

Biography
by: Carmine Funt

Anthony Diberardo is a Canadian political cartoonist who was born on the 27th of October 1476, in Canada. He spent most of his early childhood ignoring others, choosing instead to visit "happy-land". He showed artistic potential early on, often cartooning for cigarettes.
At the age of 10 he won the prestigious Royal Award for Artistic Excellence*.
He went on to win several other awards in his teen years*.

He majored in Fine Art at the University of Guelph.

In the fall of 2002 he left on a wonderful journey to South East Asia where he contracted several of the more well known STD's. There was also a brief battle with some sort of skin fungus.

For a year he taught English and Art to "a great bunch of kids", about 700 a week or so. He recalls walking into the grade three classrooms where the students used to stand and cheer, "art class!". "That made me feel really good. It was then I knew the $40,000 I spent on my degree was really worth it."

After he had his fill of street noodles, dried fish snacks and vomiting children, he drank beer in Europe for a while.

He ended up teaching again to support his "habits". This time, however, it was to university students- all English, no art. It was good. They were "a great bunch of kids".

After getting kicked out of Poland he made his triumphant* return to Southern Ontario.

Oh yes, during this time, and without even entering, he won several prestigious international awards.*

Currently he is a canadian political cartoonist who displays his work on the web, cartoons.diberardo.com, and in numerous publications*.

View diberardo's cartoons: they probably will not bite you.

* This may or may not be true, and by may I mean definitely not true.

http://cartoons.diberardo.com/about-cartoonist.php






I just noticed  this:  the skirt in the picture has flowers on it-like Joran said Natalee's underwear had on them.That info wasn't known at   this time, was  it?

Sorry if already mentioned, I am catching up


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: wreck on January 06, 2008, 03:05:50 AM
I don't want a humongous quote stack -- but yes, that is another coincidence!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: sirensong on January 06, 2008, 03:39:09 AM
I see the letters in the sky as 3 vip.   There are  the 22 on the back pack and a 6 in the sand.  I remember this was  looked at exhaustively at one time, but don't remember any conclusions?  This guy seems to be telling the reader, that Natalee's days were numbered=premeditated. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Maria on January 06, 2008, 07:05:43 AM
I read here all the time but don't post much.  I saw this sad article this morning about Meredith Emerson and these 2 statements reminded me of this case.  Deepak cleaning his car and the theory that peices of the car were cut out and replaced because of blood.

"Agents with the Georgia Bureau of Investigation also recovered a portion of a seat belt with "apparent blood transfer stains as well," according to the warrant."

"When his 2001 minivan was searched, agents "determined that the rear seat belt had been cut out," according to the warrant."

"Hilton was attempting to vacuum the vehicle and wash portions of it with a bleach and water solution," the warrant says.


http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/01/05/missing.hiker/index.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Peaches on January 06, 2008, 08:07:32 AM
I read here all the time but don't post much.  I saw this sad article this morning about Meredith Emerson and these 2 statements reminded me of this case.  Deepak cleaning his car and the theory that peices of the car were cut out and replaced because of blood.

"Agents with the Georgia Bureau of Investigation also recovered a portion of a seat belt with "apparent blood transfer stains as well," according to the warrant."

"When his 2001 minivan was searched, agents "determined that the rear seat belt had been cut out," according to the warrant."

"Hilton was attempting to vacuum the vehicle and wash portions of it with a bleach and water solution," the warrant says.


http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/01/05/missing.hiker/index.html

Good morning, Maria. 

You notice the police have no problem charging that old geezer with kidnapping even though they haven't found her body yet.  His behavior screams guilt.  Just like the behavior of some others we have observed.   


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: San on January 06, 2008, 09:16:18 AM
I was reading the case about the missing hiker and read the article of some of the charges against the guy who abducted her and most likely murdered her.  I underlined one part of the article because I seem to remember the same kind of wording that was in Beth's lawsuit against Joran and Paulus.

(http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d118/Sanddrops/Meredith.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Peaches on January 06, 2008, 09:17:48 AM
I thought it was determined that the radar or whatever that should have detected activity in the waters around the little hell hole wasn't working.  Didn't we discuss they bought the system from Raytheon and it wasn't even working?

This Soemers guy is interesting.  I can't decide if he knows more than he's saying (duh) or he's just throwing crap out there to see what he can sell. 

Either way, I'm sure he's probably right about how long it takes to get to South America by boat.  Size of the boat may vary depending on your theory of whose boat is being used.  And how fast do you wanna make the trip.  You could do it in a 50' sailboat if you wanted to.  KWIM?  There's a lot of variables to the "she left the island on a boat" idea. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: San on January 06, 2008, 09:20:11 AM
I read here all the time but don't post much.  I saw this sad article this morning about Meredith Emerson and these 2 statements reminded me of this case.  Deepak cleaning his car and the theory that peices of the car were cut out and replaced because of blood.

"Agents with the Georgia Bureau of Investigation also recovered a portion of a seat belt with "apparent blood transfer stains as well," according to the warrant."

"When his 2001 minivan was searched, agents "determined that the rear seat belt had been cut out," according to the warrant."

"Hilton was attempting to vacuum the vehicle and wash portions of it with a bleach and water solution," the warrant says.


http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/01/05/missing.hiker/index.html

Yes just like Deepak Kalpoe indeed.  The only thing is that Deepak had professional help from those Auto Enterprise people and ten days to cut out everything in his car and replace it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: WhiskeyGirl on January 06, 2008, 09:21:15 AM
I see the letters in the sky as 3 vip.   There are  the 22 on the back pack and a 6 in the sand.  I remember this was  looked at exhaustively at one time, but don't remember any conclusions?  This guy seems to be telling the reader, that Natalee's days were numbered=premeditated. 

He has a website with past cartoons, very interesting.

http://cartoons.diberardo.com/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: WhiskeyGirl on January 06, 2008, 09:34:49 AM
I thought it was determined that the radar or whatever that should have detected activity in the waters around the little hell hole wasn't working.  Didn't we discuss they bought the system from Raytheon and it wasn't even working?

This Soemers guy is interesting.  I can't decide if he knows more than he's saying (duh) or he's just throwing crap out there to see what he can sell. 

Either way, I'm sure he's probably right about how long it takes to get to South America by boat.  Size of the boat may vary depending on your theory of whose boat is being used.  And how fast do you wanna make the trip.  You could do it in a 50' sailboat if you wanted to.  KWIM?  There's a lot of variables to the "she left the island on a boat" idea. 

I remember the Dompig interview pics.  Someone suggested that he should not have shown the radar with blips of warships.  I wouldn't know a warship blip from a cigarette boat blip.

What exactly was the radar keeping track of in Aruba?  Small boats?  Pleasure craft?  Warships? 

Is there perhaps overlap with neighboring islands?  South America?

I wonder at times if the Shango/Simian had a laundry list of loose ends they were communicating.  Someone had a planning meeting and these were all items of concern.  Checked off one by one...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: San on January 06, 2008, 09:39:34 AM
Does anyone know if Astrid van Rijn worked anywhere?   What did she do all day in that big house?

She counted the drug money her son brought in.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on January 06, 2008, 10:19:07 AM
Good morning Monkeys
Interesting news on aol about Mexico and tourism........

Tourists Shun Crime-Hit Mexico Beaches
By ELLIOT SPAGAT,AP
Posted: 2008-01-05 13:23:23
PLAYAS DE ROSARITO, Mexico (AP) - Assaults on American tourists have brought hard times to hotels and restaurants that dot Mexican beaches just south of the border from San Diego.

Surfers and kayakers are frightened to hit the waters of the northern stretch of Mexico's Baja California peninsula, long popular as a weekend destination for U.S. tourists. Weddings have been canceled. Lobster joints a few steps from the Pacific were almost empty on the usually busy New Year's weekend.

Americans have long tolerated shakedowns by police who boost salaries by pulling over motorists for alleged traffic violations, and tourists know parts of Baja are a hotbed of drug-related violence. But a handful of attacks since summer by masked, armed bandits - some of whom used flashing lights to appear like police - marks a new extreme that has spooked even longtime visitors.

Lori Hoffman, a San Diego-area emergency room nurse, said she was sexually assaulted Oct. 23 by two masked men in front of her boyfriend, San Diego Surfing Academy owner Pat Weber, who was forced to kneel at gunpoint for 45 minutes. They were at a campground with about 30 tents, some 200 miles south of the border.

The men shot out windows of the couple's trailer and forced their way inside, ransacked the cupboards and left with about $7,000 worth of gear, including computers, video equipment and a guitar.

Weber, who has taught dozens of students in Mexico over the last 10 years, plans to surf in Costa Rica or New Zealand. "No more Mexico," said Hoffman, who reported the attack to Mexican police. No arrests have been made.

The Baja California peninsula is known worldwide for clean and sparsely populated beaches, lobster and margaritas and blue waters visited by whales and dolphins. Surfers love the waves; fishermen catch tuna, yellowtail and marlin. Food and hotels are cheap.

News of harrowing assaults on American tourists has begun to overshadow that appeal in the northern part of the peninsula, home to drug gangs and the seedy border city of Tijuana. The comparatively isolated southern tip, with its tony Los Cabos resort, remains safer and is still popular with Hollywood celebrities, anglers and other foreign tourists.

Local media and surfing Web sites that trumpeted Baja in the past have reported several frightening crimes that U.S. and Mexican officials consider credible. Longtime visitors are particularly wary of a toll road near the border that runs through Playas de Rosarito - Rosarito Beach.

In late November, as they returned from the Baja 1000 off-road race, a San Diego-area family was pulled over on the toll road by a car with flashing lights. Heavily armed men held the family hostage for two hours. They eventually released them but stole the family's truck.

Before dawn on Aug. 31, three surfers were carjacked on the same stretch of highway. Gunmen pulled them over in a car with flashing lights, forced them out of their vehicles and ordered one to kneel. They took the trucks and left the surfers.

Aqua Adventures of San Diego scrapped its annual three-day kayak trip to scout for whales in January, ending a run of about 10 years. Customers had already been complaining about longer waits to return to the U.S.; crime gave them another reason to stay away.

"People are just saying, 'No way.' They don't want to deal with the risk," said owner Jen Kleck, who has sponsored trips to Baja about five times a year but hasn't been since July.

Charles Smith, spokesman for the U.S. consulate in Tijuana, said the U.S. government has not found a widespread increase in attacks against Americans, but he acknowledged many crimes go unreported. The State Department has long warned motorists on Mexico's border to watch for people following them, though no new warnings have been issued.

Mexican officials acknowledge crime has threatened a lifeblood of Baja's economy. In Playas de Rosarito, a city of 130,000, police were forced to surrender their weapons last month for testing to determine links to any crimes. Heavily armed men have patrolled City Hall since a failed assassination attempt on the new police chief left one officer dead. On Thursday the bullet-riddled bodies of a Tijuana police official and another man were found dumped near the beach.

"We cannot minimize what's happening to public safety," said Oscar Escobedo Carignan, Baja's new secretary of tourism. "We're going to impose order ... We're indignant about what's happening."

Tourist visits to Baja totaled about 18 million in 2007, down from 21 million the previous year, Escobedo said. Hotel occupancy dropped about 5 percentage points to 53 percent.

Hugo Torres, owner of the storied Rosarito Beach Hotel and the city's new mayor, estimates the number of visitors to Rosarito Beach since summer is down 30 percent.

In the city's Puerto Nuevo tourist enclave, which offers $20 lobster dinners and $1 margaritas, restaurant managers said sales were down as much as 80 percent from last year. One Saturday afternoon in October, masked bandits wielding pistols walked the streets and kidnapped two men - an American and a Spanish citizen - who were later released unharmed. Two people who were with them were shot and wounded.

Omar Armendariz, who manages a Puerto Nuevo lobster restaurant, is counting on the new state and city governments to make tourists feel safer. He has never seen fewer visitors in his nine years on the job.

"It's dead," he said.


Copyright 2007 The Associated Press. The information contained in the AP news report may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or otherwise distributed without the prior written authority of The Associated Press. Active hyperlinks have been inserted by AOL.
01/05/08 13:22 EST


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Pita on January 06, 2008, 10:32:51 AM
Does anyone know if Astrid van Rijn worked anywhere?   What did she do all day in that big house?

She counted the drug money her son brought in.

She has a business on the island.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Pita on January 06, 2008, 10:40:43 AM
Does anyone know if Astrid van Rijn worked anywhere?   What did she do all day in that big house?

She counted the drug money her son brought in.

She has a business on the island.

It appears her business is located in Santa Cruz.   The company deals in prefabricated steel construction and buildings.

Santa Cruz is the location of the early cell phone call according to *******'s previous post.

VAN RIJN IM- EN EXPORT N.V. 
 
Business address BARCADERA 4, SANTA CRUZ 
Legal form  LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY 
Name of the company  VAN RIJN IM- EN EXPORT N.V. 
Statutory seat  ARUBA 
Date of incorporation  15 JANUARY 1991 
     
Authorized capital  ARUBAN FLORINS 50,000.00 
Issued capital  ARUBAN FLORINS 10,000.00 
Paid up capital  ARUBAN FLORINS 10,000.00 
Fiscal year  01 JANUARY thru 31 DECEMBER 
   
DIRECTORS - AUTHORIZED PERSONS AND CORPORATE BODIES - SUPERVISORY BOARD: 
 
VAN RIJN, PAUL; 
Residing in  BARCADERA 4, SANTA CRUZ, ARUBA 
Born in  THE NETHERLANDS, HAARLEM on 27 DECEMBER 1958 
Nationality  DUTCH 
Position  MANAGING DIRECTOR 
Effective  21 JANUARY 1991 
Authority  FULL 
   
VAN RIJN-VAN TRAKSEL, ASTRID LOUISE
Residing in  SAVANETA 123-K, SAVANETA, ARUBA 
Born in  THE NETHERLANDS, HAARLEM on 10 FEBRUARY 1960 
Nationality  DUTCH 
Position  MANAGING DIRECTOR 
Effective  21 JANUARY 1991 
Authority  FULL 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 06, 2008, 10:55:02 AM
Looks like ALE were very busy last night
http://www.24ora.com/content/blogcategory/6/8/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Pita on January 06, 2008, 10:55:49 AM
Here's another company listed under Astrid Van Rijn located at the same address as her import/export company.

R & S GO-KART RACING-TRACK ARUBA N.V. 
 
Business address BARCADERA 4, SANTA CRUZ 
Legal form  LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY 
Name of the company  R & S GO-KART RACING-TRACK ARUBA N.V. 
Statutory seat  ARUBA 
Date of incorporation  12 MAY 1993 
       
NOT IN POSSESION OF A BUSINESS ESTABLISHMENT LICENCE 
   
DIRECTORS - AUTHORIZED PERSONS AND CORPORATE BODIES - SUPERVISORY BOARD: 
 
VAN RIJN, PAUL; 
Residing in  BARCADERA 4, SANTA CRUZ, ARUBA 
Born in  THE NETHERLANDS, HAARLEM on 27 DECEMBER 1958 
Nationality  DUTCH 
Position  MANAGING DIRECTOR 
Effective  12 MAY 1993 
Authority  FULL 
   
VAN RIJN-VAN TRAKSEL, ASTRID LOUISE; 
Residing in  SAVANETA 123-K, SAVANETA, ARUBA 
Born in  THE NETHERLANDS, HAARLEM on 10 FEBRUARY 1960 
Nationality  DUTCH 
Position  MANAGING DIRECTOR 
Effective  12 MAY 1993 
Authority  FULL 

There's also this company located at the same address:

R & S DIESEL SERVICE ARUBA N.V.  
 
Business address BARCADERA 4, SANTA CRUZ 

DIRECTORS - AUTHORIZED PERSONS AND CORPORATE BODIES - SUPERVISORY BOARD: 
 
HABIBE, TOMMY ORLANDO;

CROES, NELSON ANTONIUS CERILIO;


   


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Pita on January 06, 2008, 10:59:34 AM
(http://i10.photobucket.com/albums/a118/kath8700/arubamapforklaas.jpg)

Heres a good one also

http://i10.photobucket.com/albums/a118/kath8700/arubaattmap1.gif

The island is so small no portion of it is out of the quesiton.  Thanks for the maps.  I hadn't seen this one.



Seeing this made me think of this...

Merian Ernest Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2005 5:51 pm Post subject: They call him bifrons...
Find Aruba. Find the Haystack. Find Santa Marta. Trace with your finger what the Antenna
has spoken about.


There is a street location called Santa Marta located in Santa Cruz.  Could this be the Santa Marta Merian was referring to?




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Pita on January 06, 2008, 11:01:55 AM
To add to my above post......Santa Marta, Santa Cruz rather than Santa Marta, Columbia, as some have said.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Ebb on January 06, 2008, 11:08:44 AM
Pita! VERY interesting find!

Can anyone tell me how to find Loco Stefi's zorpia page?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 06, 2008, 11:09:49 AM

Interview with Lt Rudy Soemers
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8SzUfdbGWps

I think the whole radar thing is BS. According to LT Rudy Soemers you can easily reach Point Escondido in less than a hour with a good speed boat. They have problems with illegals,,etc. If she wanted to leave Aruba it is easy to leave he says. If it's that easy for Natalee to run away to Venezuela then it would be even easier to dump her body in 300-800 foot waters off of the Aruba coast

LT Rudy Soemers!!!

Is he related to Eric Soemers ... the ALE investigator?

Janet

+++++++++++++


Dave Holloway
Corruption in Paradise


Page 183:  I commented to Jacobs about how short my statement was. He said that I could add anything I wanted to it. Also, I noticed that Eric Soemers's name was on it, but that detective was not even present during the interview. Now I wondered if Jacobs was making up everyone's statement and getting Eric to sign on to them. If that were the case, he could state anything he wanted, and it would look like an official statement made in front of a witness.


Beth Twitty
'Rita Cosby Live & Direct'
April 6, 2006


TWITTY: ... So you know, they‘re all very connected on that island. It‘s hard to find someone who‘s not a relative or a cousin.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Pita on January 06, 2008, 11:17:08 AM
Pita! VERY interesting find!

Can anyone tell me how to find Loco Stefi's zorpia page?


I don't have her Zorpia page but would hi5 work?

http://www.hi5.com/friend/profile/displayProfile.do?userid=14265404


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: San on January 06, 2008, 11:19:17 AM
Here's another company listed under Astrid Van Rijn located at the same address as her import/export company.

R & S GO-KART RACING-TRACK ARUBA N.V. 
 
Business address BARCADERA 4, SANTA CRUZ 
Legal form  LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY 
Name of the company  R & S GO-KART RACING-TRACK ARUBA N.V. 
Statutory seat  ARUBA 
Date of incorporation  12 MAY 1993 
       
NOT IN POSSESION OF A BUSINESS ESTABLISHMENT LICENCE 
   
DIRECTORS - AUTHORIZED PERSONS AND CORPORATE BODIES - SUPERVISORY BOARD: 
 
VAN RIJN, PAUL; 
Residing in  BARCADERA 4, SANTA CRUZ, ARUBA 
Born in  THE NETHERLANDS, HAARLEM on 27 DECEMBER 1958 
Nationality  DUTCH 
Position  MANAGING DIRECTOR 
Effective  12 MAY 1993 
Authority  FULL 
   
VAN RIJN-VAN TRAKSEL, ASTRID LOUISE; 
Residing in  SAVANETA 123-K, SAVANETA, ARUBA 
Born in  THE NETHERLANDS, HAARLEM on 10 FEBRUARY 1960 
Nationality  DUTCH 
Position  MANAGING DIRECTOR 
Effective  12 MAY 1993 
Authority  FULL 

There's also this company located at the same address:

R & S DIESEL SERVICE ARUBA N.V.  
 
Business address BARCADERA 4, SANTA CRUZ 

DIRECTORS - AUTHORIZED PERSONS AND CORPORATE BODIES - SUPERVISORY BOARD: 
 
HABIBE, TOMMY ORLANDO;

CROES, NELSON ANTONIUS CERILIO;

Thank you Pita for the information.

Astrid seems to own a lot of companies in the import/export business.  This is just my opinion but I wonder what others goods she is importing and exporting.  With her son being a major drug supplier on the island one has to wonder.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 06, 2008, 11:39:35 AM
Hotshot
I found an old post the other day talking about boats leaving from certain areas were not seen on radar.  I can't seem to find it now.  I thought about Lorenzo's boat then...who's to say that he didn't loan a boat to Paulus that night or maybe even Steve Croes.  Why would you do anything that you normally do right after you found out your son had a dead girl on his hands?  I just don't think she was disposed of in a hurry...this was planned out in some way.  If Joran and Deepak just got rid of her then I could believe they dumped her out from where the Gottnebos boat was. It would be easier. I don't think Deepak was involved in her disposal.

I would be willing to bet that Lorenzo wouldn't lend that Cigerette to anybody,
even if Paulus was his father.  He would only run it himself. 
Plus Cigerettes are really loud. Usually 4 / 250hp engines.
I really don't believe that the radar they have picks up small boats other than
a dot on a screen, if that.

That is my point...no one would lend a boat to Paulus and not know why.  If Paulus was in on disposal he paid someone to do it...my bet is on Steve Croes.  Otherwise, Joran handled disposal and I tend to think that would only include his close friends and Deepak is not one of them.  If Deepak and Satish had gone back and killed Natalee...neither Joran or Paulus would have disposed of anything.  They would be in the clear and it would be up to the Kalpoes to handle their own mess.  Enter Paulus....paying someone and whoever it was is still not talking....the question is why? Obviously it is not about the crime of body disposal...that would be a slap on the wrist in Aruba....it's more.  Freddy needs to tell the truth, but he's being paid to keep quiet in some way. MOO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: bleachedblack on January 06, 2008, 11:50:11 AM
I read here all the time but don't post much.  I saw this sad article this morning about Meredith Emerson and these 2 statements reminded me of this case.  Deepak cleaning his car and the theory that peices of the car were cut out and replaced because of blood.

"Agents with the Georgia Bureau of Investigation also recovered a portion of a seat belt with "apparent blood transfer stains as well," according to the warrant."

"When his 2001 minivan was searched, agents "determined that the rear seat belt had been cut out," according to the warrant."

"Hilton was attempting to vacuum the vehicle and wash portions of it with a bleach and water solution," the warrant says.


http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/01/05/missing.hiker/index.html

At least this time we can be sure that the BLOOD won't turn into chocolate and cleaning fluid.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Kermit on January 06, 2008, 11:51:21 AM
Where was the shallow grave found by TES? When I watched the news video they said it was by the national park..I am presuming that is the Arikok Park  by that Santa Lucia area?

Thursday, the GPR team scanned an area in the Arikok National Park where a shallow grave and duct tape with blonde hair were found.


(http://img85.imageshack.us/img85/6153/mapevidence63tr.jpg)

RED
There have been reports that a shallow grave was discovered in the area of Boca Tortuga, on the eastern part of the island. There are also reports that cell-phone calls made by Joran early in the morning came from a location on the eastern side of the island. It seems plausible that this area could yield more clues.
TIM MILLER
We found a site that we feel as though was a possible gravesite. Our thoughts are that Natalee may have been buried in that hole for 1 or 2 days then moved. We have information that the cell phones were possibly being used in that area. Joran stated that something went wrong and they buried Nataleein the sand which we feel the spot we found is possibly it. The duct tape and hair was found 3/4 of a mile from where the possible gravesite was. With the information of her being buried, possible cellphone usage, discovery of possible gravesite, and duct tape with hair lead me to believe that Nataleewas dumped in the sea in that area. We are anxiously awaiting the results of the hair samples which has been sent to the FBI lab and also the lab in the Netherlands

__________________________________________________________________


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Kermit on January 06, 2008, 11:59:27 AM
THE SHALLOW GRAVE


Vinda Desousa - Family Aruban Attorney
CNN LARRY KING LIVE
July 20, 2005


DESOUSA: Well about the shallow grave, there was a shallow hole, yes, found by EquuSearch, and the authorities took a look at it and apparently it had no evidence or nothing to link it to any crime.


Tim Miller
NANCY GRACE
July 13, 2005


TIM MILLER, EQUUSEARCH LEADER: ... We found an area up close, a fisherman`s hut, that we was interested in. We actually rented a backhoe. We went in there, cleared some debris out. There was a couple of mounds of dirt that we went ahead and cleared out.

And where we found that area today that kind of looked like a grave, which looked exactly like a grave -- we know what that looks like -- I`m not thoroughly convinced yet that that didn`t at one time or another have something to do with Natalee.


<snipped>

PENHAUL: The searchers were at an area called Boca Prim (ph). That`s on the northern side of the island near the national park. It`s an area of soft sand dunes. There`s only one road to get down there. It`s a very rough road. You can really only get there by four-wheel drive.

It`s where a dry riverbed meets the ocean. And it`s at that area where this thing that looked like a grave, a hole, about four feet deep and about the length of a body with a mound of sand beside it, was found, Nancy.

GRACE: Now, also, on the north end of the island, where they were today, is that where that lighthouse is?

PENHAUL: Not really, no. The lighthouse is at the northern tip, at the northwest tip. And this area is really on the northeastern side of the island.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: JusticeforNatalee on January 06, 2008, 12:12:41 PM
Hi, everyone,

Lots of good discussion going on!

It's also time to start thinking about
the Boston and NY travel shows.

If you plan to attend or can help in any way,
please contact Vicki: JusticeforNatalee@gmail.com

Thank you!

Here is the info for Boston:

http://www.bostonglobetravelshow.com/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: JusticeforNatalee on January 06, 2008, 12:17:10 PM
Here's the NY info:

http://www.nyttravelshow.com/


I don't want to take away from the Persistence in any way, but
we do need to start thinking about Boston and NY.
Boston is first; NY a week later

Both shows end of Feb.

Thanks! :smt052


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 06, 2008, 12:19:15 PM
I beg to differ with all the cartoon theorists here...these ideas were out there.  CNN had already mentioned that three witnesses that had been questioned.  The story of the HI drop off was in full force.  Photos of Natalee were all over the  news.  Rumors of drugs in drinks was being reported or at the least discussed among news people.  I attended orientation that week with my daughter at the Unversity where Natalee was to attend also.  I sat next to a gentleman from Florence, Alabama and we talked about things we had heard on the news or read such as putting drugs in drinks and the 3 perps being involved because they were the last seen with Natalee.  The guards were already in custody and theories and rumors were running rampant. We even speculated on them burying her in a hurry and going back later to move her.  Even SM had stories on the FP about the bloody mattress and the FBI dive team headed to Aruba. They had already impounded the 3 vehicles from the Sloots and Kalpoes homes...so they were already being discussed and things connected.  This cartoonist simply had a connection with the news media or was reading blogs right along with the rest of us. and drew his cartoon accordingly. If not, then this guy has some explaining to do.  I don't mean to be the debunker here...just pointing out the obvious.

Comment from FP article on June 4:

:( on June 4th, 2005 7:05 pm

This is my theory. Her friends have told me that she left the nightclub really drunk. I think that those 3 men used some sort of date rape drug on her, then took her to someplace and raped her. Then I think she overdosed on the drugs they used on her and in an effort to conceal the “accident” the three men took cut her up and threw her to the sharks…. where no body would ever be found.

I know this sounds very pesimistic and I really hope I’m wrong. I want Natalee to come back to AL.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 06, 2008, 12:36:09 PM
Here's another company listed under Astrid Van Rijn located at the same address as her import/export company.

R & S GO-KART RACING-TRACK ARUBA N.V. 
 
Business address BARCADERA 4, SANTA CRUZ 
Legal form  LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY 
Name of the company  R & S GO-KART RACING-TRACK ARUBA N.V. 
Statutory seat  ARUBA 
Date of incorporation  12 MAY 1993 
       
NOT IN POSSESION OF A BUSINESS ESTABLISHMENT LICENCE 
   
DIRECTORS - AUTHORIZED PERSONS AND CORPORATE BODIES - SUPERVISORY BOARD: 
 
VAN RIJN, PAUL; 
Residing in  BARCADERA 4, SANTA CRUZ, ARUBA 
Born in  THE NETHERLANDS, HAARLEM on 27 DECEMBER 1958 
Nationality  DUTCH 
Position  MANAGING DIRECTOR 
Effective  12 MAY 1993 
Authority  FULL 
   
VAN RIJN-VAN TRAKSEL, ASTRID LOUISE; 
Residing in  SAVANETA 123-K, SAVANETA, ARUBA 
Born in  THE NETHERLANDS, HAARLEM on 10 FEBRUARY 1960 
Nationality  DUTCH 
Position  MANAGING DIRECTOR 
Effective  12 MAY 1993 
Authority  FULL 

There's also this company located at the same address:

R & S DIESEL SERVICE ARUBA N.V.  
 
Business address BARCADERA 4, SANTA CRUZ 

DIRECTORS - AUTHORIZED PERSONS AND CORPORATE BODIES - SUPERVISORY BOARD: 
 
HABIBE, TOMMY ORLANDO;

CROES, NELSON ANTONIUS CERILIO;

Thank you Pita for the information.

Astrid seems to own a lot of companies in the import/export business.  This is just my opinion but I wonder what others goods she is importing and exporting.  With her son being a major drug supplier on the island one has to wonder.


Is this not an excellent way to launder money too?  Not saying she is, but isn't this the kind of thing the FBI looks for?  Shell companies on Caribbean islands?  MOO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 06, 2008, 12:37:55 PM
I think everyone left me in here alone.  What did I do?   Where is everyone? :shock:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Hotshot on January 06, 2008, 01:00:45 PM
I see the letters in the sky as 3 vip.   There are  the 22 on the back pack and a 6 in the sand.  I remember this was  looked at exhaustively at one time, but don't remember any conclusions?  This guy seems to be telling the reader, that Natalee's days were numbered=premeditated. 

He has a website with past cartoons, very interesting.

http://cartoons.diberardo.com/
I dont see 3VIP but I do see 3.5   maybe meaning 3-5 miles out to sea?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Hotshot on January 06, 2008, 01:31:01 PM
To add to my above post......Santa Marta, Santa Cruz rather than Santa Marta, Columbia, as some have said.

Can you show me that road please......I cant find it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Hotshot on January 06, 2008, 01:37:30 PM
Shoot, they left me alone here also.  I'll check back later to see if I got any responses.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Kat_Gram on January 06, 2008, 01:48:57 PM
It is pretty far fetched that this cartoonist has any info that wasn't made public. Also, accusing Astrid of laundering money is well, libel. I don't know what is up with me, but putting this kind of stuff on a public blog is just wrong. I've done the same kinds of things, but I don't want to speculate on ppl who have nothing to do with the case. They were never questioned by the FBI, RCMP, Interpol ,ALE or anyone and speculation of their involvement in the crime against Natalee is wrong. If they had criminals records that were a matter of public knowlegde, then we could discuss that, but to accsue uninvolved ppl of crimes is not something that I want to participate in. This won't be solved by these types of well, gossip and speculation.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Anna on January 06, 2008, 02:05:00 PM
Janet, the post I made was from a Dana Pretzer show in 2006. Jossy was talking about Natalee's case then. I do believe he had reporters who confirmed the kinship. I too think Lorenzo is a 1/2 brother to goon child & has a bigger role in Natalee's case than we know. MOO

Yapper ... thank you for pointing out that I had the year wrong on that quote.

I believe that Jossy spoke the truth regarding Lorenzo's relationship with Paulus/Joran.  However ... I wonder if intimidation was the reason he back tracked.

Janet.




Dear Janet, I don't think Jossy "back tracked" at all.  As you know from mentioning members of your family, sometimes even those with excellent English will not say something the same way when English is a Second Language.  I believe Jossy previously was confirming the RUMOR, not that the rumor was true but rather what was said in the rumors. I can't imagine his being intimidated by much of anything at this late date, certainly not this, in my opinion only.

That is why I asked my question so excruciatingly detailed, to separate the confirmation of the rumor with the confirmation of the facts here:

Scroll down to the July 23, 2007 interview with Dana to Minute 27:00 and Jossy says that it is just rumor concerning Lorenzo and he has never been able to confirm it. 
 
 
http://scaredmonkeysradio.com/2007/07/

I have even marked the Minute to save having to listen to the whole tape to find it.

And my question was if this person, Lorenzo, was involved with Natalee's disappearance in any way and not his drug bust nor selling drugs but if he personally had anything to do with it that could be confirmed as other than rumor and he answered NO.  Same with being related to the Sloots.  I believe him and also think he would have the ways and means to find out otherwise if it were true.

Someone was looking for Rob.  I have run across him several times lately but as early as November, he was posting on another forum that the article at the following link pretty well "closed the door" on Lorenzo for him.  We have all had questionable or unreliable sources at times.


http://www.amw.com/missing_persons/case.cfm?id=32411


I also try to maintain a little bit of hope that Hans Mos will still come through and he says that no one is involved other than the primary suspects, J2K+P and called the rest "fabrications."  This is the man in charge for the next two plus years so I do hope he knows of what he speaks.

I've said for some time that my list of suspects keeps shrinking and it does right down to those very suspects.  I think they and they alone are responsible from start to finish of what became of Natalee. 

I do realize others think differently but I have to go where my own logic takes me.


Hope everyone has a wonderful afternoon. . . .the cold has passed here and it is going to be very close to if not 70 degrees today!

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Jerry from Ohio on January 06, 2008, 02:11:50 PM
Man O man are some of those people over at RU  vicious and really don't care what they say  do they ?  :2doh:  to Klaas and Tylergal <g> 
  Jerry from Ohio .  :lol:   :wink:




Those people in those pool party pictures look like Drag Queens. :shock:

I don't understand the guy with the painted animal face.  What did that have to do with a birthday party?  And when does the birthday boy entertain everyone?  It was bizarre the first time I saw it and it still is.  Did we ever decide who those men were with the Minister?

It is hard to explain why these people do these things but my first thought when I saw all the going's on from this island were doped, drugged, drunk and depraved.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 06, 2008, 02:58:03 PM
Update: Sun 06-Jan 1535


The seas abated sufficiently to maintain our progress through the night and into the early morning hours. The Persistence arrived dockside around 0430 hrs this morning. Rested and ready, the crew makes ready for departure at 1515 hrs. Now a routine, the crew toss the lines and we depart. Leaving the dock past the behemoth cruise ships reminds me of the opening scene from "Space Balls". Their shear immensity projects an image of being impervious to the seas.

(http://bp0.blogger.com/_d8XtKIwObt4/R4Eqx-DWjQI/AAAAAAAAALM/NIx6Sa7vre8/s400/Persistence_cruiseship_aAruba.JPG)

http://nholloway.blogspot.com/



Working and lurking again  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Tylergal on January 06, 2008, 03:25:18 PM
Man O man are some of those people over at RU  vicious and really don't care what they say  do they ?  :2doh:  to Klaas and Tylergal <g> 
  Jerry from Ohio .  :lol:   :wink:




Those people in those pool party pictures look like Drag Queens. :shock:

I don't understand the guy with the painted animal face.  What did that have to do with a birthday party?  And when does the birthday boy entertain everyone?  It was bizarre the first time I saw it and it still is.  Did we ever decide who those men were with the Minister?

It is hard to explain why these people do these things but my first thought when I saw all the going's on from this island were doped, drugged, drunk and depraved.


But I am in search of a much greater thing.  I’m above their sensationalism. So what I’m looking for is fact, not their propaganda.  The pit  vipers will amass themselves at the summoning of their elders. I am quite sure it is what they do. But, they use their slavering and palavering as a tool against truth and light.  They strike like cornered snakes when truth of their crime is brought to light.  They have posted propaganda which many have used as a compass.  But I do have some information of what they were even before.  I walk among them and they know not of whom I am, I am sure.  I return the favor as I fill them with my own propaganda.  My work is not done, but is nearing a close. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 06, 2008, 03:31:22 PM

Interview with Lt Rudy Soemers
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8SzUfdbGWps

LT Rudy Soemers!!!

Is he related to Eric Soemers ... the ALE investigator?

Janet

+++++++++++++


Dave Holloway
Corruption in Paradise


Page 183:  I commented to Jacobs about how short my statement was. He said that I could add anything I wanted to it. Also, I noticed that Eric Soemers's name was on it, but that detective was not even present during the interview. Now I wondered if Jacobs was making up everyone's statement and getting Eric to sign on to them. If that were the case, he could state anything he wanted, and it would look like an official statement made in front of a witness.


Beth Twitty
'Rita Cosby Live & Direct'
April 6, 2006


TWITTY: ... So you know, they‘re all very connected on that island. It‘s hard to find someone who‘s not a relative or a cousin.

During that interview Lt Rudy Soemers says he thinks Mr.Soemers is leading the Investigation.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: texasmom on January 06, 2008, 04:08:50 PM
www.bolaccountants.nl/images/Nr52006Coverstorycolumnversie3.pdf

Can't read the article, but Eric Soemers is the man on the left in picture.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Buckeye on January 06, 2008, 04:15:34 PM
To add to my above post......Santa Marta, Santa Cruz rather than Santa Marta, Columbia, as some have said.

Can you show me that road please......I cant find it.

Santa Marta east of airport, on this map:

http://www.arubayp.com/maps.html?PageNumber=6


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 06, 2008, 04:22:19 PM
To add to my above post......Santa Marta, Santa Cruz rather than Santa Marta, Columbia, as some have said.

Can you show me that road please......I cant find it.

Santa Marta east of airport, on this map:

http://www.arubayp.com/maps.html?PageNumber=6


Not too far from the Canashito. June 11th 2005 Arubagirl reports a large empty plastic bag found in Canashito and Leila reports Locals are saying something is happening in Canashito

(http://i198.photobucket.com/albums/aa118/Observer00000007/Scaredmonkeysfpcommentscanashitojun.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Pita on January 06, 2008, 04:33:08 PM
To add to my above post......Santa Marta, Santa Cruz rather than Santa Marta, Columbia, as some have said.

Can you show me that road please......I cant find it.

I don't know where the road is but if you can locate this company you will find it.

R. & R. AUTO REPAIR & SALES N.V. 
 
Business address SANTA MARTA 4, SANTA CRUZ   




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 06, 2008, 04:34:50 PM
It is pretty far fetched that this cartoonist has any info that wasn't made public. Also, accusing Astrid of laundering money is well, libel. I don't know what is up with me, but putting this kind of stuff on a public blog is just wrong. I've done the same kinds of things, but I don't want to speculate on ppl who have nothing to do with the case. They were never questioned by the FBI, RCMP, Interpol ,ALE or anyone and speculation of their involvement in the crime against Natalee is wrong. If they had criminals records that were a matter of public knowlegde, then we could discuss that, but to accsue uninvolved ppl of crimes is not something that I want to participate in. This won't be solved by these types of well, gossip and speculation.


You obviously didn't read what I said.  I said I was not saying she  laundered money I am simply pointing out that import/export businesses are a favorite target of watch for the FBI and other agencies to watch for such activity. The other day another monkey pointed out the connection with import/export and I was simply mentioning it again. It was my opinion and I have come to realize that suddenly anything we have ever discussed at any time in the past is now wrong, wrong , wrong.  Well, that's all fine and good...but frankly I am tired of only being able to discuss just certain aspects of this case.  It's a waste of my time to be in this thread because no matter what is said it's always the wrong thing...no wonder so many people have left this forum.  As long as it is anything but Lorenzo and his family it's fair game to talk about. I am tired of this accusing me of gossip and speculation. Isn't the idea that Koen and Sander helped provide a boat rumor and gossip also?  Where is the evidence that they did this?  It's just speculation. Isn't the idea that Joran had bloody shoes a speculation?  We have never seen any evidence that he had blood on his shoes. Some think Steve Croes helped dispose of Natalee...that is speculation also. So why is it if I mention Lorenzo and his mother and others talk about it I am somehow spreading gossip? I don't need an answer I already know it...if it isn't what certain people want to see, then it's gossip and rumor  and speculation. What about linking the Soemers men together?  Is that not also speculation that they might be in this together. I am simply asking questions and then letting people discuss their ideas. When that ceases to be a free exercise on the internet then there is no freedom of speech any longer. I thought that is basically all we do here is speculate on what we think has happened. I will not discuss Lorenzo or his family any longer on this thread. I will go to the Shango thread from now on. I am tired of this and I have other things to do besides sit here and be treated like this. So enjoy your discussions in the future...I will remain in the Shango thread and be happy. BTW Shango and Simian is basically gossip and speculation also, so please refrain from their discussion here also.  This rant is not directed at any one person in particular, I am just fed up with being the person to bash all the time just because I have a different opinion.  It is not directed at Kat or Anna in any way...just a general rant on my part.  And as usual MOO.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Hotshot on January 06, 2008, 04:37:19 PM
Quote
Heli from RU write this
In addition, the suggestion that Deepak cut out or otherwise removed
portions of the interior of the car as a means of foiling detection of
physical evidence, merely shows the ignorance of All10.

Let's assume portions of the upholstery or headliner were removed
to get rid of bio evidence of foul play. Be assured that any new fabric,
carpet or seats would be readily detected by forensic examiners. Anything
recently installed in or on that car could easily be identified as such and
followed up on by ALE. There was nothing of evidenciary value!  

Were we not told that Deepaks cars radio was installed there for he had all the carpets replaced in order to run the wiring?  All the guy at the Auto place could talk about was how Deepak didnt mention a licence or the girl........Duhhhh, NO they didnt follow up on that at all IMO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 06, 2008, 04:44:25 PM
Suspicious activity by a white van in the Canashito Area(Located next to Santa Marta)
#  arubagirl on June 11th, 2005 1:18 am

According to the prime minister the fam. didn’t know this until they turned on CNN. The radio stations are also reporting that cops are heading to recover the remains. First it was lighthouse, then it was Bubali Plas (shallow lake), now it’s Canashito, the rock quarry.


(http://i66.photobucket.com/albums/h254/chicagoutfit/arubagirlwhitevanatcanoshita.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Magnolia on January 06, 2008, 05:16:57 PM
It is pretty far fetched that this cartoonist has any info that wasn't made public. Also, accusing Astrid of laundering money is well, libel. I don't know what is up with me, but putting this kind of stuff on a public blog is just wrong. I've done the same kinds of things, but I don't want to speculate on ppl who have nothing to do with the case. They were never questioned by the FBI, RCMP, Interpol ,ALE or anyone and speculation of their involvement in the crime against Natalee is wrong. If they had criminals records that were a matter of public knowlegde, then we could discuss that, but to accsue uninvolved ppl of crimes is not something that I want to participate in. This won't be solved by these types of well, gossip and speculation.


You obviously didn't read what I said.  I said I was not saying she  laundered money I am simply pointing out that import/export businesses are a favorite target of watch for the FBI and other agencies to watch for such activity. The other day another monkey pointed out the connection with import/export and I was simply mentioning it again. It was my opinion and I have come to realize that suddenly anything we have ever discussed at any time in the past is now wrong, wrong , wrong.  Well, that's all fine and good...but frankly I am tired of only being able to discuss just certain aspects of this case.  It's a waste of my time to be in this thread because no matter what is said it's always the wrong thing...no wonder so many people have left this forum.  As long as it is anything but Lorenzo and his family it's fair game to talk about. I am tired of this accusing me of gossip and speculation. Isn't the idea that Koen and Sander helped provide a boat rumor and gossip also?  Where is the evidence that they did this?  It's just speculation. Isn't the idea that Joran had bloody shoes a speculation?  We have never seen any evidence that he had blood on his shoes. Some think Steve Croes helped dispose of Natalee...that is speculation also. So why is it if I mention Lorenzo and his mother and others talk about it I am somehow spreading gossip? I don't need an answer I already know it...if it isn't what certain people want to see, then it's gossip and rumor  and speculation. What about linking the Soemers men together?  Is that not also speculation that they might be in this together. I am simply asking questions and then letting people discuss their ideas. When that ceases to be a free exercise on the internet then there is no freedom of speech any longer. I thought that is basically all we do here is speculate on what we think has happened. I will not discuss Lorenzo or his family any longer on this thread. I will go to the Shango thread from now on. I am tired of this and I have other things to do besides sit here and be treated like this. So enjoy your discussions in the future...I will remain in the Shango thread and be happy. BTW Shango and Simian is basically gossip and speculation also, so please refrain from their discussion here also.  This rant is not directed at any one person in particular, I am just fed up with being the person to bash all the time just because I have a different opinion.  It is not directed at Kat or Anna in any way...just a general rant on my part.  And as usual MOO.

Shoot....I thought we just couldn't spit and cuss.  I thought discussing any and
everything until it was proven or disproven was what it was all about.
Silly me!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Maria on January 06, 2008, 05:28:17 PM
I read here all the time but don't post much.  I saw this sad article this morning about Meredith Emerson and these 2 statements reminded me of this case.  Deepak cleaning his car and the theory that peices of the car were cut out and replaced because of blood.

"Agents with the Georgia Bureau of Investigation also recovered a portion of a seat belt with "apparent blood transfer stains as well," according to the warrant."

"When his 2001 minivan was searched, agents "determined that the rear seat belt had been cut out," according to the warrant."

"Hilton was attempting to vacuum the vehicle and wash portions of it with a bleach and water solution," the warrant says.


http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/01/05/missing.hiker/index.html

Good morning, Maria. 

You notice the police have no problem charging that old geezer with kidnapping even though they haven't found her body yet.  His behavior screams guilt.  Just like the behavior of some others we have observed.   


Yes.  Exactly my point.  Aruba could have solved this if they weren't incompetent and corrupt.  We all know Deepak, Satish, Joran and Paulus are guilty among others on the island.  They never even attempted to search for Natalee in the beginning and didn't want their property searched.  If it was me and I was innocent I would have done all I could to help - that includes search for Natalee and have my property cleared to clear my name.  It also bugged me from day one that they kept calling her "the girl".  In all respect she has a name, so use it!  These people have no manners(to put it very politely).


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 06, 2008, 05:32:56 PM
Anything pertaining to the Natalee Holloway case, including theories can be discussed in this thread!

Now, back to working and lurking.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 06, 2008, 05:39:11 PM

Shoot....I thought we just couldn't spit and cuss.  I thought discussing any and
everything until it was proven or disproven was what it was all about.
Silly me!
It is,The case is still not solved and we are already in the year 2008. Almost everything is speculation and very few hard facts. No one should be afraid to discuss anything case related. That includes people that were brought in for questioning or rumored to be involved. We all know who the main suspects are but any clue,hint or lead should be followed until Natalee's dissapearance is solved. To ignore anyone that is suspicious or we were told may be involved is foolish. It's a cover up and it's not just the Van Der Sloot's they are protecting.

Anyone that spends there free time researching and doing anything they can to put the pieces together I admire a great deal. The truth of what happened to Natalee and what they did with her has definetly been talked about at one time or another on this board. God bless the people that continue to try and get answer's and put that puzzle together. It may be one small discovery that leads to this case being solved.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Magnolia on January 06, 2008, 05:44:24 PM
Thank you Klaas and *******!  I will continue not to spit or cuss.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Magnolia on January 06, 2008, 05:47:48 PM
Quote
Heli from RU write this
In addition, the suggestion that Deepak cut out or otherwise removed
portions of the interior of the car as a means of foiling detection of
physical evidence, merely shows the ignorance of All10.

Let's assume portions of the upholstery or headliner were removed
to get rid of bio evidence of foul play. Be assured that any new fabric,
carpet or seats would be readily detected by forensic examiners. Anything
recently installed in or on that car could easily be identified as such and
followed up on by ALE. There was nothing of evidenciary value!  

Were we not told that Deepaks cars radio was installed there for he had all the carpets replaced in order to run the wiring?  All the guy at the Auto place could talk about was how Deepak didnt mention a licence or the girl........Duhhhh, NO they didnt follow up on that at all IMO

I have always thought that since the Kalpoe's step father owned the car
place that they just switched out the car with the stains for another car.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Altruist on January 06, 2008, 05:51:39 PM
Lala'sMom, would you please reconsider & not hide out from the current NH threads?

When it is so obvious that your post was either not thoroughly read or misinterpretted wouldn't it be ok to just fly on by it after one read & post to the rest of us who do read your posts????????

After all this time you know you are one of the fav's around here, come on, don't punish us cuz a few have offended you.  I know you gotta be tougher than that or you wouldn't still be here fighting against all that is evil.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Magnolia on January 06, 2008, 05:56:28 PM
Lala'sMom, would you please reconsider & not hide out from the current NH threads?

When it is so obvious that your post was either not thoroughly read or misinterpretted wouldn't it be ok to just fly on by it after one read & post to the rest of us who do read your posts????????

After all this time you know you are one of the fav's around here, come on, don't punish us cuz a few have offended you.  I know you gotta be tougher than that or you wouldn't still be here fighting against all that is evil.

Lala's they are expecting you at RU any minute. 
You know that you would rather be here than there. :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Maria on January 06, 2008, 06:17:40 PM
Aruba needs a lesson and a rude awakening(which we all know).  Lala's Mom - I read every day and don't post much but I alway enjoy reading your posts.

"There is considerable evidence based on the information that we received from the public," Bankhead said.

Humm - Aruba had witness statements and they threw them all out or disregarded them as not credible.

http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/01/06/missing.hiker/index.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: wreck on January 06, 2008, 06:37:46 PM
I think many of us mistake arguing against a point as a personal attack meaning they should not ever bring up a suspect or a point. I am probably guilty of this as much as anyone but I truly believe ALL opinions are fair game as long they are well meaning. Everyone should be able to express their opinion and also be able to handle dissenting opinions. We are all getting a little thin skinned it seems.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: San on January 06, 2008, 07:01:31 PM
It is pretty far fetched that this cartoonist has any info that wasn't made public. Also, accusing Astrid of laundering money is well, libel. I don't know what is up with me, but putting this kind of stuff on a public blog is just wrong. I've done the same kinds of things, but I don't want to speculate on ppl who have nothing to do with the case. They were never questioned by the FBI, RCMP, Interpol ,ALE or anyone and speculation of their involvement in the crime against Natalee is wrong. If they had criminals records that were a matter of public knowlegde, then we could discuss that, but to accsue uninvolved ppl of crimes is not something that I want to participate in. This won't be solved by these types of well, gossip and speculation.


You obviously didn't read what I said.  I said I was not saying she  laundered money I am simply pointing out that import/export businesses are a favorite target of watch for the FBI and other agencies to watch for such activity. The other day another monkey pointed out the connection with import/export and I was simply mentioning it again. It was my opinion and I have come to realize that suddenly anything we have ever discussed at any time in the past is now wrong, wrong , wrong.  Well, that's all fine and good...but frankly I am tired of only being able to discuss just certain aspects of this case.  It's a waste of my time to be in this thread because no matter what is said it's always the wrong thing...no wonder so many people have left this forum.  As long as it is anything but Lorenzo and his family it's fair game to talk about. I am tired of this accusing me of gossip and speculation. Isn't the idea that Koen and Sander helped provide a boat rumor and gossip also?  Where is the evidence that they did this?  It's just speculation. Isn't the idea that Joran had bloody shoes a speculation?  We have never seen any evidence that he had blood on his shoes. Some think Steve Croes helped dispose of Natalee...that is speculation also. So why is it if I mention Lorenzo and his mother and others talk about it I am somehow spreading gossip? I don't need an answer I already know it...if it isn't what certain people want to see, then it's gossip and rumor  and speculation. What about linking the Soemers men together?  Is that not also speculation that they might be in this together. I am simply asking questions and then letting people discuss their ideas. When that ceases to be a free exercise on the internet then there is no freedom of speech any longer. I thought that is basically all we do here is speculate on what we think has happened. I will not discuss Lorenzo or his family any longer on this thread. I will go to the Shango thread from now on. I am tired of this and I have other things to do besides sit here and be treated like this. So enjoy your discussions in the future...I will remain in the Shango thread and be happy. BTW Shango and Simian is basically gossip and speculation also, so please refrain from their discussion here also.  This rant is not directed at any one person in particular, I am just fed up with being the person to bash all the time just because I have a different opinion.  It is not directed at Kat or Anna in any way...just a general rant on my part.  And as usual MOO.

Well I guess I was part of this discussing this morning about Astrid.  In my opinion and only my opinion Astrid cannot be ruled out.  Her son is a major drug dealer on that island and we have the proof.  I believe one monkey even commented that the drugs he was caught with was worth $1,000,000.  It is said that he inherited the business from his father (Jury is still out on who is actual father is...IMO).  How does one become so untouchable on that island.  Drugs and Money that is how.  So her being his mother puts her right in the spotlight.  So what were are trying to do is connect the dots through some speculation.

I don't care who I am dragging through the mud in Aruba.  Everyone is fair game to me.  If Natalee, Beth, Jug, Dave are fair game to them then the gloves are off and I will attack them.

Should we:

  • Stop talking about Arlene Ellis Schipper because her cousin was some how involved in Natalee's death.

    Stop talking about Koen because he had a boat.

    Stop talking about Sander because he lost his phone.

    Stop talking about Dennis Jacobs because we thought he didn't do his job.

    Stop talking about Rudy Croes being dirty hand.

    Stop talking about Karin Janssen because she worked with Paulus.

    Stop talking about Gerald Dompig because he said Natalee died of an accidental OD.

    Stop talking about Van der Straaten because he is Paulus' best friend.

    Stop talking about Ben Vocking because he owed Paulus a favor.

    Stop talking about Judges Wit and Smit because they ruled in favor of J2K and one changed a search warrant.

All the people above are not a witnesses or suspects so I guess we should not talk about them anymore.

Lorenzo must not be ruled out.  He is in the same category as the people above.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Kermit on January 06, 2008, 07:09:40 PM
(http://www.bucuticam.com/zoom3.jpg)

TROPICAL ISLAND IS A BUST


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: San on January 06, 2008, 07:13:28 PM
(http://www.bucuticam.com/zoom3.jpg)

TROPICAL ISLAND IS A BUST

Good choice of words  :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Kermit on January 06, 2008, 07:15:37 PM
Quote
Heli from RU write this
In addition, the suggestion that Deepak cut out or otherwise removed
portions of the interior of the car as a means of foiling detection of
physical evidence, merely shows the ignorance of All10.

Let's assume portions of the upholstery or headliner were removed
to get rid of bio evidence of foul play. Be assured that any new fabric,
carpet or seats would be readily detected by forensic examiners. Anything
recently installed in or on that car could easily be identified as such and
followed up on by ALE. There was nothing of evidenciary value!  



Perhaps Deepak switched cars.

Remember his mom, Nadria stated that the Honda was Deepak's prize and he would not even drive it to work because he was afraid of a scratch getting on it. OCD Deepak would most likely use another vehicle when he knew that Joran wanted to go to Carlos n' Charlie's to pick up the last night tourists that Joran had already targeted Natalee Holloway!

Just like when Deepak and Freddy picked up Bailey - he was in a different silver car!

Look again at the photo of the car in the Diamond's International shot. Is that a spoiler on the back?
Could be.

Take the challenge and prove it wrong. Then it would be ruled out.





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: San on January 06, 2008, 07:18:03 PM
Quote
Heli from RU write this
In addition, the suggestion that Deepak cut out or otherwise removed
portions of the interior of the car as a means of foiling detection of
physical evidence, merely shows the ignorance of All10.

Let's assume portions of the upholstery or headliner were removed
to get rid of bio evidence of foul play. Be assured that any new fabric,
carpet or seats would be readily detected by forensic examiners. Anything
recently installed in or on that car could easily be identified as such and
followed up on by ALE. There was nothing of evidenciary value!  



Perhaps Deepak switched cars.

Remember his mom, Nadria stated that the Honda was Deepak's prize and he would not even drive it to work because he was afraid of a scratch getting on it. OCD Deepak would most likely use another vehicle when he knew that Joran wanted to go to Carlos n' Charlie's to pick up the last night tourists that Joran had already targeted Natalee Holloway!

Just like when Deepak and Freddy picked up Bailey - he was in a different silver car!

Look again at the photo of the car in the Diamond's International shot. Is that a spoiler on the back?
Could be.

Take the challenge and prove it wrong. Then it would be ruled out.


I wonder if the king of bling Satish Kalpoe had his own car.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: bleachedblack on January 06, 2008, 07:21:52 PM
Lala'sMom, would you please reconsider & not hide out from the current NH threads?

When it is so obvious that your post was either not thoroughly read or misinterpretted wouldn't it be ok to just fly on by it after one read & post to the rest of us who do read your posts????????

After all this time you know you are one of the fav's around here, come on, don't punish us cuz a few have offended you.  I know you gotta be tougher than that or you wouldn't still be here fighting against all that is evil.
Altruist well said
 :smt038 :smt038 :smt038

Heck Lala's and anyyone else who might now, in the past, or in the future want to discuss a subject that involves Natalee's case we should feel free to do so without threat of reprimand and accusation. Some here have gotten very high and mighty about a few subjects.......which I think is wrong. If any think it right...emmm i know
a reefergee forum they might want to join. (Klaas can I say that ?)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: kkate on January 06, 2008, 07:24:51 PM
Pita! VERY interesting find!

Can anyone tell me how to find Loco Stefi's zorpia page?


I don't have her Zorpia page but would hi5 work?

http://www.hi5.com/friend/profile/displayProfile.do?userid=14265404
Did you notice who was on the bottom right on page 11 of her friend's list?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 06, 2008, 07:26:01 PM

Interview with Lt Rudy Soemers
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8SzUfdbGWps

LT Rudy Soemers!!!

Is he related to Eric Soemers ... the ALE investigator?

Janet

+++++++++++++


Dave Holloway
Corruption in Paradise

Page 183:  I commented to Jacobs about how short my statement was. He said that I could add anything I wanted to it. Also, I noticed that Eric Soemers's name was on it, but that detective was not even present during the interview. Now I wondered if Jacobs was making up everyone's statement and getting Eric to sign on to them. If that were the case, he could state anything he wanted, and it would look like an official statement made in front of a witness.


Beth Twitty
'Rita Cosby Live & Direct'
April 6, 2006


TWITTY: ... So you know, they‘re all very connected on that island. It‘s hard to find someone who‘s not a relative or a cousin.

During that interview Lt Rudy Soemers says he thinks Mr.Soemers is leading the Investigation.

******* ... when you consider what Dave reveals in regards to his statement that implies it was not only changed but it was witnessed by Eric Soemers ... an Eric Soemers who was not present.  It makes one question how many of the following statements were actually witnessed by Eric Soemers.

Was Dennis Jacobs in charge obtaining and mainipulating statements in an attempt to conform to an agenda ... an agenda to distance Paulus and Joran from implication in the events that encompass the morning when Natalee Holloway disappearance?

Janet

++++++++++


http://nataleesfreebirds.blogspot.com/2007/11/dennis-jacobs.html

Dennis Jacobs
Lead Investigator? Or Key Obstructionist?

What key elements could have been given by these various witnesses and suspects, that Dennis Jacobs may have tampered with?


Freddy Zedan
June 17, 2005 pages 6
writer: Dennis Jacobs/Eric Soemers
description: witness statement

Freddy Zedan Arrambatzis
July 20, 2005 pages 4
writer: Dennis Jacobs/Eric Soemers
description: witness statement

Freddy Alexander Arambatzis
February 10, 2006 17:15 pages 5
writer: Dennis Jacobs/Eric Soemers
description: interrogation of a suspect

Jaime Alberto Carrasquilla
August 30, 2005 pages 5
writer: Dennis Jacobs/Eric Soemers
description: witness statement

Stefany Mejia Cortes
August 23, 2005 pages 5 - attachments of photographs
writer: Dennis Jacobs/Eric Soemers
description: witness statement/complaint

Stefany Mejia Cortes
August 24, 2005 pages 3
writer: Dennis Jacobs/Eric Soemers
description: witness statement/complaint

Margaritha Dijkhoff - Van der Sloot maid - third statement
August 11, 2005 pages 3
writer: Dennis Jacobs/Eric Soemers
description: witness statement

Judith Geerman
July 29, 2005 page 1
writer: Dennis Jacobs/Eric Soemers
description: witness statement

Koen Gottenbos
August 30, 2005 18:30 pages 3
writer: Dennis Jacobs/Eric Soemers
description: witness statement

Jose Anacleto Maduro
August 28, 2005 pages 5 - two photograph attachments
writer: Dennis Jacobs/Eric Soemers
description: witness statement by a prison inmate

Wilfred Benito Maduro
February 14, 2006 16:00 pages 3
writer: Dennis Jacobs/Eric Soemers
description: witness statement

Milangelo Jairo Ferdinand Marcano
September 10, 2005 pages 3
writer: Dennis Jacobs/Eric Soemers
description: witness statement


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Anna on January 06, 2008, 07:26:55 PM
Well, I must have missed it because I have not seen one person post that anyone should "stop talking" about anybody.  I don't believe that has been suggested at all.

However, I also think that those with a different opinion from the majority should be allowed to state their opinion as well without it being called an attack.  Not sharing the same opinion as somebody else is not an attack. 

And the main difference to me in Astrid and Lorenzo van Rijn and all those people listed is that we have verified connections to those and do not to the van Rijns.  Am I not free to think that and must I agree with others in order to post here?  All the others are connected by statements from the family, ALE, or Beth or even Joran's book.  Giving one statement to ALE is not enough to prove a connection to me.  If it is to you, fine.

I didn't see anyone say anything to Lala's at all that was offensive in any way. 

You think what you think but I also think what I think.

Angie, did you decide who posts here that might be related to Lorenzo?  And Lala's, did you ever find out what Delores middle name was?

Guess I didn't get the memo on when the Group Think started and thought we were all free to have our own opinions.  I didn't understand that having a different one was an attack and for whatever reasons, mine was some how inferior to the opinion of others.

I think I've got it straight now.  Either agree with the majority or don't post.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 06, 2008, 07:36:20 PM
Interresting dynamics.  I'm seeing a few posts complaining about things nobody has done.

ANYTHING pertaining to the Natalee Holloway case, including theories and people in Aruba that have been brought up or questioned in the case is FAIR GAME in this thread. 

If you don't agree with what someone posts feel free to state why.  There is no problem with that.  NOBODY SAYS WE HAVE TO ALL AGREE.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Magnolia on January 06, 2008, 07:39:19 PM
Well, I must have missed it because I have not seen one person post that anyone should "stop talking" about anybody.  I don't believe that has been suggested at all.

However, I also think that those with a different opinion from the majority should be allowed to state their opinion as well without it being called an attack.  Not sharing the same opinion as somebody else is not an attack. 

And the main difference to me in Astrid and Lorenzo van Rijn and all those people listed is that we have verified connections to those and do not to the van Rijns.  Am I not free to think that and must I agree with others in order to post here?  All the others are connected by statements from the family, ALE, or Beth or even Joran's book.  Giving one statement to ALE is not enough to prove a connection to me.  If it is to you, fine.

I didn't see anyone say anything to Lala's at all that was offensive in any way. 

You think what you think but I also think what I think.

Angie, did you decide who posts here that might be related to Lorenzo?  And Lala's, did you ever find out what Delores middle name was?

Guess I didn't get the memo on when the Group Think started and thought we were all free to have our own opinions.  I didn't understand that having a different one was an attack and for whatever reasons, mine was some how inferior to the opinion of others.

I think I've got it straight now.  Either agree with the majority or don't post.

.

Anna .... please, give it a rest.  Nobody has attacked you.  You are the one who
mentions that word so often.  Don't be so disagreeable.  Just skip over if you
don't like what is said.  It isn't personal.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: San on January 06, 2008, 07:39:36 PM
Well, I must have missed it because I have not seen one person post that anyone should "stop talking" about anybody.  I don't believe that has been suggested at all.

However, I also think that those with a different opinion from the majority should be allowed to state their opinion as well without it being called an attack.  Not sharing the same opinion as somebody else is not an attack. 

And the main difference to me in Astrid and Lorenzo van Rijn and all those people listed is that we have verified connections to those and do not to the van Rijns.  Am I not free to think that and must I agree with others in order to post here?  All the others are connected by statements from the family, ALE, or Beth or even Joran's book.  Giving one statement to ALE is not enough to prove a connection to me.  If it is to you, fine.

I didn't see anyone say anything to Lala's at all that was offensive in any way. 

You think what you think but I also think what I think.

Angie, did you decide who posts here that might be related to Lorenzo?  And Lala's, did you ever find out what Delores middle name was?

Guess I didn't get the memo on when the Group Think started and thought we were all free to have our own opinions.  I didn't understand that having a different one was an attack and for whatever reasons, mine was some how inferior to the opinion of others.

I think I've got it straight now.  Either agree with the majority or don't post.

.

Anna, I want everyone to post including the people who lurk.  This is what makes this forum so great is that we all have different theories and opinions of who is involved.  The only thing that is set is stone is that Natalee was last seen with 3 people and never to be seen again.  We are trying to put pieces together.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: bleachedblack on January 06, 2008, 07:40:45 PM
No you don't get it. The truth of the matter is it does not seem at times that all opinions are created equal in the eyes of some here, and that is just not the case. Sometimes posters here might not realize this. I don't think new or old posters want to sign in and find this bickering either so lets end it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: texasmom on January 06, 2008, 07:44:31 PM
AMEN and THANK YOU KLAASEND, ******* and SAN!    :smt038

San, you saved me a whole lotta typing.....I have been thinking all afternoon about how to respond and the more I thought about it the madder I got.  Until Natalee is found or the TRUTH is told and can be proven about 71,000 plus on that dirty little island are under my suspicion.  Just as in raising children the saying is "it takes a village", it's taken all of those who know keeping their silence to prevent this case from being solved.  If Natalee had returned home with her classmates as she should have, I probably would have never known what really goes on in Aruba and probably would have vacationed there at some time.  I've spent many hours in the other forums this week scanning for any information that I thought might be helpful.  I've not done this much in the past because I love this forum and spend the little time I do have on the internet here.  I was sickened to read what bloggers on other sights have said about Beth (especially).  What did she do to deserve the utter nonsense that is all over the internet about her?  Simple, she loves her daughter and wants answers.  I have always thought that Beth and Dave have shown a great deal more self control in this situation that I could ever hope to have in their shoes.   Aruba wants us all to give up and forget about what happened to Natalee.  They want us to believe that her family, the media, or anything other than the obvious coverup is the reason this case is not solved.  Well, they can forget it!  I for one will NEVER FORGET and will NEVER GIVE UP hope of finding her.  I believe that it will take all of us working together, whether or not we agree with everything the other says to expose the TRUTH.  Lala's, you are a part of this great group of Monkeys and I hope you'll reconsider.   



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 06, 2008, 07:51:20 PM
THE SHALLOW GRAVE


Vinda Desousa - Family Aruban Attorney
CNN LARRY KING LIVE
July 20, 2005


DESOUSA: Well about the shallow grave, there was a shallow hole, yes, found by EquuSearch, and the authorities took a look at it and apparently it had no evidence or nothing to link it to any crime.

<snipped>


http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0507/20/lkl.01.html
_________


Hi Kermit

When it is taken into consideration that there is a contention that the Natalee Holloway case was solves and ... a coverup was already in the works prior to Beth and Jug setting foot on the the Island ... it is not surprising that the Aruban authorities dismissed the discovery of a shallow grave as evidence.

Janet

+++++++++


Beth Twitty
'Scarborough Country'
October 21, 2005


HOLLOWAY TWITTY: They never—they never wanted to implicate these three young men. They never wanted to implicate them from the beginning. And there is a list of reasons, you know, why we know that is true.
http://msnbc.msn.com/id/9796403/from/RL.2/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 06, 2008, 07:51:45 PM
Great post, texasmom :thumright:

That's what it's all about....Natalee.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: San on January 06, 2008, 07:53:58 PM
AMEN and THANK YOU KLAASEND, ******* and SAN!    :smt038

San, you saved me a whole lotta typing.....I have been thinking all afternoon about how to respond and the more I thought about it the madder I got.  Until Natalee is found or the TRUTH is told and can be proven about 71,000 plus on that dirty little island are under my suspicion.  Just as in raising children the saying is "it takes a village", it's taken all of those who know keeping their silence to prevent this case from being solved.  If Natalee had returned home with her classmates as she should have, I probably would have never known what really goes on in Aruba and probably would have vacationed there at some time.  I've spent many hours in the other forums this week scanning for any information that I thought might be helpful.  I've not done this much in the past because I love this forum and spend the little time I do have on the internet here.  I was sickened to read what bloggers on other sights have said about Beth (especially).  What did she do to deserve the utter nonsense that is all over the internet about her?  Simple, she loves her daughter and wants answers.  I have always thought that Beth and Dave have shown a great deal more self control in this situation that I could ever hope to have in their shoes.   Aruba wants us all to give up and forget about what happened to Natalee.  They want us to believe that her family, the media, or anything other than the obvious coverup is the reason this case is not solved.  Well, they can forget it!  I for one will NEVER FORGET and will NEVER GIVE UP hope of finding her.  I believe that it will take all of us working together, whether or not we agree with everything the other says to expose the TRUTH.  Lala's, you are a part of this great group of Monkeys and I hope you'll reconsider.   

I agree texasmom.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: texasmom on January 06, 2008, 07:57:58 PM
Great post, texasmom :thumright:

That's what it's all about....Natalee.

thanks 2NJSons, believe me I was hesitant to say what I did but it was from my heart.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 06, 2008, 07:59:29 PM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/NH2008.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Ebb on January 06, 2008, 08:15:08 PM
kkate

Yes. This is weird, but I'm sure this link is the Loco Stefy everyone talks about here. Yet last year I followed a link on Zorpia to a Stefy who also listed herself as Stefany Croes. and it was a different girl. This one had an interest in the occult, black magic, was an artist. She included photos from each of the places where it was suggested that Natalee might have been, w/joran and others. It was very creepy. I've always thought to find her might be useful. But the one people here call Loco Stefy is not the same girl as on the Zorpia site I read. I'm 95% sure. But can't find it again.
Sorry if I am causing more confusion. Does anyone know who Stephanie Croes is?
(Not the beauty queen).


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 06, 2008, 08:24:48 PM
kkate

Yes. This is weird, but I'm sure this link is the Loco Stefy everyone talks about here. Yet last year I followed a link on Zorpia to a Stefy who also listed herself as Stefany Croes. and it was a different girl. This one had an interest in the occult, black magic, was an artist. She included photos from each of the places where it was suggested that Natalee might have been, w/joran and others. It was very creepy. I've always thought to find her might be useful. But the one people here call Loco Stefy is not the same girl as on the Zorpia site I read. I'm 95% sure. But can't find it again.
Sorry if I am causing more confusion. Does anyone know who Stephanie Croes is?
(Not the beauty queen).

Stephanie Croes and Loco Stef (the Hi5) are two different people yes.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 06, 2008, 08:25:51 PM
Back to working and lurking.  Will check back in about 15 minutes or so  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 06, 2008, 08:31:51 PM
I have no problem respectfully agreeing to disagree regarding aspects of the Natalee Holloway case.  However ... considering I have already determined that a corrupt investigation is denying Natalee Holloway a just investigation ... I would be wasting my time on a forum where a dialogue ... ever a respectful dialogue was ... upholding either Joran, Paulus or the Aruban investigation.  I consider those who have not already arrived at this place as possessing an Aruban agenda and ... I refuse to allow them to distract me from my objective ... JUSTICE FOR NATALEE HOLLOWAY.

Also ... I would be gone in a flash if any poster on this forum were allowed to disrespectfully undermine Beth's efforts/ intentions/ character in the name of "difference of opinion".

I believe that honoring Natalee is what it is all about on the Scared Monkey forum and ... I am proud to be a Monkey.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: dennisintn on January 06, 2008, 08:40:27 PM
I have no problem respectfully agreeing to disagree regarding aspects of the Natalee Holloway case.  However ... considering I have already determined that a corrupt investigation is denying Natalee Holloway a just investigation ... I would be wasting my time on a forum where a dialogue ... ever a respectful dialogue was ... upholding either Joran, Paulus or the Aruban investigation.  I consider those who have not already arrived at this place as possessing an Aruban agenda and ... I refuse to allow them to distract me from my objective ... JUSTICE FOR NATALEE HOLLOWAY.

Also ... I would be gone in a flash if any poster on this forum were allowed to disrespectfully undermine Beth's efforts/ intentions/ character in the name of "difference of opinion".

I believe that honoring Natalee is what it is all about on the Scared Monkey forum and ... I am proud to be a Monkey.

Janet

my sentiments exactly, tm.
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 06, 2008, 08:44:46 PM
I have no problem respectfully agreeing to disagree regarding aspects of the Natalee Holloway case.  However ... considering I have already determined that a corrupt investigation is denying Natalee Holloway a just investigation ... I would be wasting my time on a forum where a dialogue ... ever a respectful dialogue was ... upholding either Joran, Paulus or the Aruban investigation.  I consider those who have not already arrived at this place as possessing an Aruban agenda and ... I refuse to allow them to distract me from my objective ... JUSTICE FOR NATALEE HOLLOWAY.

Also ... I would be gone in a flash if any poster on this forum were allowed to disrespectfully undermine Beth's efforts/ intentions/ character in the name of "difference of opinion".

I believe that honoring Natalee is what it is all about on the Scared Monkey forum and ... I am proud to be a Monkey.

Janet

I agree 100%


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: bleachedblack on January 06, 2008, 08:46:24 PM
I have no problem respectfully agreeing to disagree regarding aspects of the Natalee Holloway case.  However ... considering I have already determined that a corrupt investigation is denying Natalee Holloway a just investigation ... I would be wasting my time on a forum where a dialogue ... ever a respectful dialogue was ... upholding either Joran, Paulus or the Aruban investigation.  I consider those who have not already arrived at this place as possessing an Aruban agenda and ... I refuse to allow them to distract me from my objective ... JUSTICE FOR NATALEE HOLLOWAY.

Also ... I would be gone in a flash if any poster on this forum were allowed to disrespectfully undermine Beth's efforts/ intentions/ character in the name of "difference of opinion".

I believe that honoring Natalee is what it is all about on the Scared Monkey forum and ... I am proud to be a Monkey.

Janet

Very eloquently stated Janet, and on that note I would just like to say "me too" and "thank-you".


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Magnolia on January 06, 2008, 09:00:53 PM
I have no problem respectfully agreeing to disagree regarding aspects of the Natalee Holloway case.  However ... considering I have already determined that a corrupt investigation is denying Natalee Holloway a just investigation ... I would be wasting my time on a forum where a dialogue ... ever a respectful dialogue was ... upholding either Joran, Paulus or the Aruban investigation.  I consider those who have not already arrived at this place as possessing an Aruban agenda and ... I refuse to allow them to distract me from my objective ... JUSTICE FOR NATALEE HOLLOWAY.

Also ... I would be gone in a flash if any poster on this forum were allowed to disrespectfully undermine Beth's efforts/ intentions/ character in the name of "difference of opinion".

I believe that honoring Natalee is what it is all about on the Scared Monkey forum and ... I am proud to be a Monkey.

Janet

Thank you, Janet for saying it so well.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: texasmom on January 06, 2008, 09:02:33 PM
very well said Janet, I definately agree!


 
:smt100
Does anyone know where the information is regarding the "cell pings", I either read or heard that if you are "this far out in the ocean from Aruba" it will register at a tower on Aruba, but after you go a certain distance it will register off a tower in Venezuela?  I thought this information came out after the latest releases of the suspects but am unable to find what I'm looking for.  I would appreciate any efforts to assist me.  TIA


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Pita on January 06, 2008, 09:05:54 PM
kkate

Yes. This is weird, but I'm sure this link is the Loco Stefy everyone talks about here. Yet last year I followed a link on Zorpia to a Stefy who also listed herself as Stefany Croes. and it was a different girl. This one had an interest in the occult, black magic, was an artist. She included photos from each of the places where it was suggested that Natalee might have been, w/joran and others. It was very creepy. I've always thought to find her might be useful. But the one people here call Loco Stefy is not the same girl as on the Zorpia site I read. I'm 95% sure. But can't find it again.
Sorry if I am causing more confusion. Does anyone know who Stephanie Croes is?
(Not the beauty queen).

Here's what I have on Stephanie Croes.  Not sure if this is the same person you are talking about.

She was a contestant for the Miss Universe Aruba 2008 Pageant.


(http://i103.photobucket.com/albums/m153/CMPM/StephanieCroes.jpg)

http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.visitaruba.com/images/p_stephanie.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.visitaruba.com/attractions/whatson/miss_aruba.html&h=300&w=200&sz=46&hl=en&start=1&um=1&tbnid=4ipYCAqeborfNM:&tbnh=116&tbnw=77&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dstephanie%2Bcroes%2Baruba%26svnum%3D10%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26rlz%3D1T4GGIC_enUS209US212%26sa%3DN


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: hotping on January 06, 2008, 09:14:30 PM
AMEN and THANK YOU KLAASEND, ******* and SAN!    :smt038

San, you saved me a whole lotta typing.....I have been thinking all afternoon about how to respond and the more I thought about it the madder I got.  Until Natalee is found or the TRUTH is told and can be proven about 71,000 plus on that dirty little island are under my suspicion.  Just as in raising children the saying is "it takes a village", it's taken all of those who know keeping their silence to prevent this case from being solved.  If Natalee had returned home with her classmates as she should have, I probably would have never known what really goes on in Aruba and probably would have vacationed there at some time.  I've spent many hours in the other forums this week scanning for any information that I thought might be helpful.  I've not done this much in the past because I love this forum and spend the little time I do have on the internet here.  I was sickened to read what bloggers on other sights have said about Beth (especially).  What did she do to deserve the utter nonsense that is all over the internet about her?  Simple, she loves her daughter and wants answers.  I have always thought that Beth and Dave have shown a great deal more self control in this situation that I could ever hope to have in their shoes.   Aruba wants us all to give up and forget about what happened to Natalee.  They want us to believe that her family, the media, or anything other than the obvious coverup is the reason this case is not solved.  Well, they can forget it!  I for one will NEVER FORGET and will NEVER GIVE UP hope of finding her.  I believe that it will take all of us working together, whether or not we agree with everything the other says to expose the TRUTH.  Lala's, you are a part of this great group of Monkeys and I hope you'll reconsider.   


Thank You...TexasMom...You Make Me Proud to be a Texan....I Could Not have Said It Better Myself. Sincerely PC


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Pita on January 06, 2008, 09:20:44 PM
kkate

Yes. This is weird, but I'm sure this link is the Loco Stefy everyone talks about here. Yet last year I followed a link on Zorpia to a Stefy who also listed herself as Stefany Croes. and it was a different girl. This one had an interest in the occult, black magic, was an artist. She included photos from each of the places where it was suggested that Natalee might have been, w/joran and others. It was very creepy. I've always thought to find her might be useful. But the one people here call Loco Stefy is not the same girl as on the Zorpia site I read. I'm 95% sure. But can't find it again.
Sorry if I am causing more confusion. Does anyone know who Stephanie Croes is?
(Not the beauty queen).

Here's what I have on Stephanie Croes.  Not sure if this is the same person you are talking about.

She was a contestant for the Miss Universe Aruba 2008 Pageant.


(http://i103.photobucket.com/albums/m153/CMPM/StephanieCroes.jpg)

http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.visitaruba.com/images/p_stephanie.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.visitaruba.com/attractions/whatson/miss_aruba.html&h=300&w=200&sz=46&hl=en&start=1&um=1&tbnid=4ipYCAqeborfNM:&tbnh=116&tbnw=77&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dstephanie%2Bcroes%2Baruba%26svnum%3D10%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26rlz%3D1T4GGIC_enUS209US212%26sa%3DN

Here is Stephanie Croes' hi5 site.  There are more albums to view on the left side of the site.

http://www.hi5.com/friend/photos/displayPhotoUser.do?photoId=140168066&ownerId=32389248


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: San on January 06, 2008, 09:22:03 PM
I have no problem respectfully agreeing to disagree regarding aspects of the Natalee Holloway case.  However ... considering I have already determined that a corrupt investigation is denying Natalee Holloway a just investigation ... I would be wasting my time on a forum where a dialogue ... ever a respectful dialogue was ... upholding either Joran, Paulus or the Aruban investigation.  I consider those who have not already arrived at this place as possessing an Aruban agenda and ... I refuse to allow them to distract me from my objective ... JUSTICE FOR NATALEE HOLLOWAY.

Also ... I would be gone in a flash if any poster on this forum were allowed to disrespectfully undermine Beth's efforts/ intentions/ character in the name of "difference of opinion".

I believe that honoring Natalee is what it is all about on the Scared Monkey forum and ... I am proud to be a Monkey.

Janet

Nicely said Tamokosmom :smt023. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: yapperz1 on January 06, 2008, 09:30:10 PM
I have no problem respectfully agreeing to disagree regarding aspects of the Natalee Holloway case.  However ... considering I have already determined that a corrupt investigation is denying Natalee Holloway a just investigation ... I would be wasting my time on a forum where a dialogue ... ever a respectful dialogue was ... upholding either Joran, Paulus or the Aruban investigation.  I consider those who have not already arrived at this place as possessing an Aruban agenda and ... I refuse to allow them to distract me from my objective ... JUSTICE FOR NATALEE HOLLOWAY.

Also ... I would be gone in a flash if any poster on this forum were allowed to disrespectfully undermine Beth's efforts/ intentions/ character in the name of "difference of opinion".

I believe that honoring Natalee is what it is all about on the Scared Monkey forum and ... I am proud to be a Monkey.

Janet

I agree 2000%.
I may have differing opinions on people involved or the intrepretations of something that has been posted or stated, but we are all entitled to our own opinions. I think hashing any minute detail out is working toward a common goal of JUSTICE FOR NATALEE. MOO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: texasmom on January 06, 2008, 09:30:35 PM
thanks PC!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: hotping on January 06, 2008, 09:37:52 PM
thanks PC!
You're Very Welcome!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Blue Moon on January 06, 2008, 10:07:43 PM
Here is a link to a barbados forum--read down about half way concerning the Mathews case and the calls for a boycot.  Then read under that about the murder of an american tourist in 1996.  This website is interesting.

http://www.barbadosforum.com/index.php?showtopic=3263&st=20&start=20


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 06, 2008, 10:16:50 PM
Here is a link to a barbados forum--read down about half way concerning the Mathews case and the calls for a boycot.  Then read under that about the murder of an american tourist in 1996.  This website is interesting.

http://www.barbadosforum.com/index.php?showtopic=3263&st=20&start=20

Thanks, I've bookmarked it and will check it out later.  I'm still WORKING, yuck. 

Back to working and lurking  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Blue Moon on January 06, 2008, 10:20:39 PM
Here is a link to a barbados forum--read down about half way concerning the Mathews case and the calls for a boycot.  Then read under that about the murder of an american tourist in 1996.  This website is interesting.

http://www.barbadosforum.com/index.php?showtopic=3263&st=20&start=20

Thanks, I've bookmarked it and will check it out later.  I'm still WORKING, yuck. 

Back to working and lurking  :wink:

YOU WORK TOOOOOOOOOOOOOO HARD. :lol: :lol: :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: anidac on January 06, 2008, 10:26:09 PM
Here is a link to a barbados forum--read down about half way concerning the Mathews case and the calls for a boycot.  Then read under that about the murder of an american tourist in 1996.  This website is interesting.

http://www.barbadosforum.com/index.php?showtopic=3263&st=20&start=20

Thanks, I've bookmarked it and will check it out later.  I'm still WORKING, yuck. 

Back to working and lurking  :wink:

YOU WORK TOOOOOOOOOOOOOO HARD. :lol: :lol: :lol:

WHAT BLUE MOON SAID!!!  Knock it off or you will end up like me. :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: robots on January 06, 2008, 10:48:43 PM
all hope is not lost, i once waited years for something.  :cool:

i have seen things in my life that many people would say... "that will never happen"

sure, it may never happen but it you "shake it up" you dont always get the same thing out of the mix....lets keep shaking

shake shake it some more.

Natalee was murdered, it was covered up, and people know this.

it was not done by 1 person. probably not even done by 2 people.

that is a powerful thing on our side...

justice is right around the corner  :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: robots on January 06, 2008, 10:52:10 PM
i hope joran keeps drinking YARD after YARD

loose ugly lips sink Anita  :P :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: robots on January 06, 2008, 10:53:27 PM
im going to keep my christmas outfit on all year

 :P :P :P :P


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Blue Moon on January 06, 2008, 10:55:35 PM
i hope joran keeps drinking YARD after YARD

loose ugly lips sink Anita  :P :cool:


Have we had any news lately if this "sporter" is back at school or if he moved somewhere else is Holland?  Did you see today it was reported Anita and Paulus were observed on the beach watching the ship?  How could they just stand there and not tell where Natalee is?  Disgusting pigs (MO).


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 06, 2008, 10:56:58 PM
all hope is not lost, i once waited years for something.  :cool:

i have seen things in my life that many people would say... "that will never happen"

sure, it may never happen but it you "shake it up" you dont always get the same thing out of the mix....lets keep shaking

shake shake it some more.

Natalee was murdered, it was covered up, and people know this.

it was not done by 1 person. probably not even done by 2 people.

that is a powerful thing on our side...

justice is right around the corner :cool:


Well needed optimism,thank you Robots! :)



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 06, 2008, 11:01:43 PM
im going to keep my christmas outfit on all year

 :P :P :P :P

LOL  :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 06, 2008, 11:02:49 PM
Here is a link to a barbados forum--read down about half way concerning the Mathews case and the calls for a boycot.  Then read under that about the murder of an american tourist in 1996.  This website is interesting.

http://www.barbadosforum.com/index.php?showtopic=3263&st=20&start=20

Thanks, I've bookmarked it and will check it out later.  I'm still WORKING, yuck. 

Back to working and lurking  :wink:

YOU WORK TOOOOOOOOOOOOOO HARD. :lol: :lol: :lol:

WHAT BLUE MOON SAID!!!  Knock it off or you will end up like me. :wink:

Hi Anidac - sorry I missed you


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Magnolia on January 06, 2008, 11:03:37 PM
im going to keep my christmas outfit on all year

 :P :P :P :P

Robots...it is so nice to see a cheerful and optimistic face.
It has been pretty gloomy around here today. :-?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: robots on January 06, 2008, 11:04:47 PM
i like christmas

i may even keep my lights on all year... :lol: :P

keep drinking joran, keep drinking yards and yards

you to K2 brothers, keep drinking

the more i think about it, the happier i am that there are so many people involved

they cant keep it up forever...
they JUST CANT

 :P :P :P :P :P


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: robots on January 06, 2008, 11:07:21 PM
im going to keep my christmas outfit on all year

 :P :P :P :P

Robots...it is so nice to see a cheerful and optimistic face.
It has been pretty gloomy around here today. :-?

i will get things going one way or the other

i was visiting my folks tonight, they can only handle me for about an hour  :lol: :lol: :lol:

 :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

they say i "cant just leave it alone"  whenever i get involved in something

they were not referring to this case. but in things in general

i just cant- im going down fighting  :cool:



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: robots on January 06, 2008, 11:10:01 PM
and i dont even like to fight


but im always willing   :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Magnolia on January 06, 2008, 11:14:46 PM
i hope joran keeps drinking YARD after YARD

loose ugly lips sink Anita  :P :cool:


Have we had any news lately if this "sporter" is back at school or if he moved somewhere else is Holland?  Did you see today it was reported Anita and Paulus were observed on the beach watching the ship?  How could they just stand there and not tell where Natalee is?  Disgusting pigs (MO).

I hope that the wind beat them to a pulp! :-x


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: robots on January 06, 2008, 11:14:57 PM
i was born with a fire in my belly and i cant put it out


 :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:


 :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: robots on January 06, 2008, 11:16:04 PM
im going to keep my christmas outfit on all year

 :P :P :P :P

Robots...it is so nice to see a cheerful and optimistic face.
It has been pretty gloomy around here today. :-?

maybe because its monday tomorrow and a full week of work ahead..  :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Magnolia on January 06, 2008, 11:17:42 PM
i was born with a fire in my belly and i cant put it out


 :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:


 :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Didn't Johnny Cash write a song about that? :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: texasmom on January 06, 2008, 11:18:29 PM
You're too funny robots! :smt111

My family's probably wondering when I'm going to take the tree down.  I don't remember when I've ever had it up this long.  I like Christmas too!  What can I say...I've probably been at this computer longer during this Christmas break than I have all year long.  I really don't want to have to go back to work tomorrow, but I guess I need to.  I'd planned to go in and work on some things on my desk during the break but didn't make it in so I really dread it.  :sad:



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: robots on January 06, 2008, 11:19:02 PM
i was born with a fire in my belly and i cant put it out


 :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:


 :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Didn't Johnny Cash write a song about that? :lol:

i dont know .. maybe he did

but i will look and see if i can find it  :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: robots on January 06, 2008, 11:23:59 PM
You're too funny robots! :smt111

My family's probably wondering when I'm going to take the tree down.  I don't remember when I've ever had it up this long.  I like Christmas too!  What can I say...I've probably been at this computer longer during this Christmas break than I have all year long.  I really don't want to have to go back to work tomorrow, but I guess I need to.  I'd planned to go in and work on some things on my desk during the break but didn't make it in so I really dread it.  :sad:



just keep singing christmas songs...  it will make you feel better

 :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: robots on January 06, 2008, 11:25:11 PM
all hope is not lost, i once waited years for something.  :cool:

i have seen things in my life that many people would say... "that will never happen"

sure, it may never happen but it you "shake it up" you dont always get the same thing out of the mix....lets keep shaking

shake shake it some more.

Natalee was murdered, it was covered up, and people know this.

it was not done by 1 person. probably not even done by 2 people.

that is a powerful thing on our side...

justice is right around the corner :cool:


Well needed optimism,thank you Robots! :)



hope is not a strategy but sometimes its all we got

 :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: robots on January 06, 2008, 11:26:09 PM
im going to go wrastle with Anna Banana and bring her home
 :cool: :lol: :cool: :lol: :cool: :lol:


i will find her  :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: robots on January 06, 2008, 11:27:51 PM
im going to HOLD MY BREATH until she comes BACK

 :P :P :P :P :P :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool:

if i start turning blue i will need robots mouth to mouth

 :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 06, 2008, 11:32:17 PM
i hope joran keeps drinking YARD after YARD

loose ugly lips sink Anita  :P :cool:


Have we had any news lately if this "sporter" is back at school or if he moved somewhere else is Holland?  Did you see today it was reported Anita and Paulus were observed on the beach watching the ship?  How could they just stand there and not tell where Natalee is?  Disgusting pigs (MO).

Last I heard he was planning on moving to the big city of Amsterdam. But that was before his arrest.

Paul and Anita will get theres one way or the other. It was obvious in the very beginning when they lawyered up Joran and all his pimp friends and never helped at all in the searches. They knew where she was then and still do to this day. As Mos indicated both Paul and Joran both said they had more to tell but weren't ready to tell just yet. Everybody know's they are still lying,including the Arubans and justice is inevitable.

Just last week Judge Wit said that Police Chief Dompig obstructed the Investigation and didn't want them searching the Van Der Sloot property. He said they wanted to protect Paul Van Der Sloots privacy!!!Then said that the OM didn't request to search the property outside of Jorans Apt or anything in the future!! He admitted they waited 16 days to search the house then blocked everything except the jorans lil apt and 2 cars. Do they think we are stupid? A heavy weight judge just admitted Dompig obstructed the Investigation,they protected the main suspects and the prosecuters office did nothing except cover up a murder. This was just a week after they announced the case was cold/closed....You have got to be kidding me!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: texasmom on January 06, 2008, 11:58:52 PM
You're right *******, Paulus and Anita will get theirs....



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 07, 2008, 12:01:43 AM

Well needed optimism,thank you Robots! :)



hope is not a strategy but sometimes its all we got

 :wink:

That and to boycott the hell out of Aruba!  :wink:

That island is only 74 sq miles. Although theres a chance she could be buried somewhere on it,the percentage has to be extremely low. It is surrounded by water and everyone knows someone with a boat. The Van Der Sloots never ever want Natalee to be found and the best way to guarentee that is the ocean. We have the best team in the world out searching right now. So please everyone say a prayer,that Natalee is found tommorow! Time is running out and we need a miracle!

Light a candle for Natalee and the Persistece crew
http://www.gratefulness.org/candles/candles.cfm?l=eng&gi=NAH


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: texasmom on January 07, 2008, 12:16:38 AM
*******, we're thinking a lot alike!  Except I've decided that we need to Boycott all of the ABC islands.  The judges for the most part have been from Curacao, and considering where the poor excuse of a chief of police went, I don't believe Bonaire is any better either.  In Beth's book the part about the areas they were not allowed to search with the "barbed wire" around the tops of the fences, there are a LOT of those in Curacao too.  We vacationed there in 2001 and we were all curious as to why this was necessary, they even had broken glass in the fencing!  I'm also remembering what Amy Bradley's family went through and they still don't have answers.  Before I read your post I was about to suggest that we all say an extra prayer and maybe send a post to Kyle on his website to let them know we are all still hoping and praying for their success.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 07, 2008, 12:36:06 AM
Hi TM :)

Sending a post to Kyle and the Team is a great idea. They have been on that ship now approaching 3 weeks and some even longer. Time is ticking and this may be Natalee's best chance for ever coming home. I hope they are not getting discouraged or feeling all alone in this search. I'M a bit sad because I know in my heart Joran has told several people what they did with Natalee. They have to live the rest of there lives knowing they did nothing to help. What's the big deal about Natalee being found? Unless Koen's brothers cell phone is with Natalee,Whats preventing him from making a anonymous email? It's been 31 months now and most humans I would think want to relieve there conscious about what they know.

Right now all that is on my Boycott list is Aruba. But I am highly suspicious what the mother country has been doing with this case since Aug 2006. MOS=FOS as far as I am concerned  :wink: I don't know much about Bonaire and Curacao except they are very similar to Aruba. I would be stunned if either Govt is 1/10th as Evil as the Aruban Govt.

P.S.
I like the way you think  :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: crazybabyborg on January 07, 2008, 12:58:03 AM
I've been posting in the search threads. Is there a better way to send a message of encouragement to the search crews?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: texasmom on January 07, 2008, 12:58:45 AM
Hi *******,
I'm not happy with the mother country either, I definately agree on the "MOS=FOS", among other things.  I don't think some of them have a conscious, in the beginning there was one suspect that I thought might but I guess I was wrong.  It is sad......One day they may have children....how will they look back on what they've done or what they've hidden?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 07, 2008, 01:00:58 AM
I've been posting in the search threads. Is there a better way to send a message of encouragement to the search crews?

CBB - I think if you post here in the search theads or over on the Search Blog both will be seen.  Kyle comes here and reads when he gets the opportunity to.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: texasmom on January 07, 2008, 01:03:39 AM
I'd better call it a night...6am is not far away. 
Goodnight everyone!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: IBE on January 07, 2008, 03:35:09 AM
Re the cartoon:

The hatch marks at the upper left appear to cover something...also drawn with straight lines...so it is necessary to print the cartoon and use good lighting and perhaps a magnifying glass.  I see at the very edge of the paper under the hatchmarks a larger house and then a small one room house-type figure next to it.  I always thought that referred to Joran's apartment.

I'll stop as I know that we have covered this off and on for the past 2+ years.  It has always been a mystery.  It looks like Karl may have been his source.

I never realized that was a house Mere until you just told me.  It could have been mentioned before but I could have missed it.  I also agree that it is the Van der Sloot house.  As far as it being Joran's apartment it could be or even the shed in the Sloot dump.

It is always good to go over things again because people miss stuff.

It looks like a church with a cemetery beside it to me.
I can see a steeple.

With my little laptop screen, it looks like a donkey to me :roll:

Keep up the good works and dedication, Good Monkeys! Remember we are all family


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: IBE on January 07, 2008, 04:37:10 AM
Have we ever made any connections between the PTB on Aruba and the North Korean arms thing that Beth mentioned in her book? 

Well, if I remember correctly there was talk that whatever was going on with Natalee and as it was found out. it would shock the world"

Here's Rob's idea of what it its all about:


Rob
Scared Monkey
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 4144
View Profile
   
   
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #682 9/24 -
« Reply #7 on: September 24, 2007, 01:28:40 PM »

   Reply with quoteQuote
"Since no one was able to make the connection (and I'm surprised, everyone must be having and off day) I will.

North Korea has no money. Zip, Zilch, NaDa! Unless you consider them printing OUR currency a free foreign aid program.

They print the money using equipment available to only a few countries in the world. (And no, I do not know how they or the Iranians got their hands on it, I think that is a big question). This equipment to produce money is very high tech and used by only a few governments. The Iranians have somehow got the same equipment. They also print 100 dollars bills and when Warren Christopher was Sec of Defense he declared it an act of war. So know you know how and why Bill Clinton made Aruba a target all the way back in 1996 or 1998. (I forget which year off the top of my head).

I also, believe that the US Treasury also produces all the Aruban Florins. So they like money that is not counterfeited.

Back to the connection.

When the North Koreans flip the switch on the printing that's just the start. The fake money is then stored until there is a lot of it. Like a few hundred million. Then the fake money needs to enter the flow of commerce.

They need an accomplice willing to distribute the money. Enter ARUBA and their corrupt banking system.

After Aruba gets the money, they exchange with North Korea a percent. Aruba may receive 15 percent or more. Possibly as much as 30 percent. Could be as high as 50 percent.

100 dollar bill - counterfeit.
-50 given to Aruba
-50 given back to North Korea in CLEAN AMERICAN DOLLARS -  THE REAL ONES THEY GET FROM GAMBLING AND ALL THE OTHER CROOKED STUFF THAT HAPPENS ON THAT ISLAND.

The clean American dollars (the actual real money) goes into building the North Korean Nuke Program.

So, North Korea basically declares war on the USA by counterfeiting out currency and that currency the gets moved around in the Aruban banking system (Banco De Carribe and Aru-bank and a few others) then gets co-mingled with real money that makes it's way to SA and back to North America where it is promptly rounded up as counterfeit.

This scheme involving the North Koreans will not work unless you have a lawless nation with access to real American money. (Another reason to boycott that dump).

It would not work with a nation like Dominica. Not enough real American Dollars in circulation. You need a vast sum.

So how much?

Billions. You need access to a country that has or has access to billions of America dollars.

And that is why Aruba is chosen, and is a willing participant.

So how did this stop the investigation? This like be my opinion.

It (the investigation) got derailed because North Korea was the major cog here. There was a diplomatic effort over the last 10 years to get North Korea to dismantle a program that no one is sure was ever real. They did explode a high amount of something, but no one knows if it was a nuke or not. If it was, it was low level yield. A small nuke. If it was even that at all.

No one in the State Dept was going to take Aruba apart while that effort was on going.

And while there is an agreement between North Korea and the 6 Party Nations to disarm they are up to their old shenanigans again. No one is sure they will totally disarm.

So, you have a price to pay. Do you allow a few billion dollars to go through a God Less little death trap in exchange for an entire region being Nuke Free and getting those weapons out of the hands of a madman? And in turn leave that little rock alone for the time being?

That question is easy to answer from a State Dept view point. Of course you do.

We are talking about the lives of over a billion people involved here.

It's obvious that the US Federal Gov't has known about this scheme for quite sometime and has decided negotiation  is the correct route.

Looks like Natalee and her family did get caught in something bigger than any of us imagine at the time.
Rob
Scared Monkey
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 4144


So how did this stop the investigation? This like be my opinion.

It (the investigation) got derailed because North Korea was the major cog here. There was a diplomatic effort over the last 10 years to get North Korea to dismantle a program that no one is sure was ever real. They did explode a high amount of something, but no one knows if it was a nuke or not. If it was, it was low level yield. A small nuke. If it was even that at all.

No one in the State Dept was going to take Aruba apart while that effort was on going.

And while there is an agreement between North Korea and the 6 Party Nations to disarm they are up to their old shenanigans again. No one is sure they will totally disarm.

So, you have a price to pay. Do you allow a few billion dollars to go through a God Less little death trap in exchange for an entire region being Nuke Free and getting those weapons out of the hands of a madman? And in turn leave that little rock alone for the time being?

That question is easy to answer from a State Dept view point. Of course you do.

We are talking about the lives of over a billion people involved here.

It's obvious that the US Federal Gov't has known about this scheme for quite sometime and has decided negotiation  is the correct route.

Looks like Natalee and her family did get caught in something bigger than any of us imagine at the time."

[/quote]


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: MumInOhio on January 07, 2008, 05:30:24 AM
Thank You Ibe

8-20-2003

But it's true that i heard that Lorenzo the son of the owner Paul( the one who hanged himself last year) was talking about wanting to come with a VW animal animal for a long time now, they have money, he and his dad were giving bills of 100 florin away like crazy when they invited us to trip with them.Posted by pietjezz6-9-2005

Off topic, do you guys remember the incident where a father and his son of a wellknown cardealership full drogged off entered a party with a car and did the madmax thing(???).... Well, some employers of C&C saw the son getting out  hand in hand with this chick. Does this mean that the 2 guys in custody are smoke screen??? Posted by Ginox

Posted by Pietjezz 6-10-2005

                                                            GinoX I don't get this? I know you're talking about Lorenzo and his now deceased dad Paul of VW ! I'm straight to the point!   You mean, this american chick was seen getting out of C&C hand in hand with Lorenzo?? Where did that (info) come from?  Didn't the story go that she got out( C&C) and got into a car with a dutch boy and 2 suriname??

But now i don't know if i'm getting paranoid or what, but at beginning of the week my neighbour told me that they detained Lorenzo and he has something to do with this case! I was in shock, and more so when they said that one dutch guy is involved it gave me more reason to think that it must be him!                                                                                                    A few days later they released the name of the dutch guy Joran, I thought ahn no, it's not Lorenzo ( What i thought at first)                                                                                        But what has me puzzled ( confused i think) is if you  look at diario of a few days back aparantly they arrested Joran at his house!!! But the house looks alot like Lorenzo's house at Yara/Savaneta.  So i had to ask what was going on?? Am i paranoid or how?                              What connection could Lorenzo and Joran have with each other in this case here!                                                                                                                                  And what made me post this post is the post of GinoX!

Gino can you explain what you mean or someone else please!! confused confused
 
 
 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: MumInOhio on January 07, 2008, 06:14:49 AM
Sorry...*******....that was from the Lorenzo thread.


Can anyone remember when the male and femal TV/Media peaople committed suicide, please?  The woman was on a balcony. TIA


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: MumInOhio on January 07, 2008, 06:22:21 AM
LOL.....I found it......Good Morning all!

12/27/2006 -- Diario reports the apparent suicide of Brigitte Christine Katelaan, 37, a producer for Tele Aruba. Death by hanging.
http://www.diario-aruba.com/2006/12/27/
Posted by klaas on M&C thread 12/27/2006.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: wreck on January 07, 2008, 08:40:42 AM
Have we ever made any connections between the PTB on Aruba and the North Korean arms thing that Beth mentioned in her book? 

Well, if I remember correctly there was talk that whatever was going on with Natalee and as it was found out. it would shock the world"

Here's Rob's idea of what it its all about:


Rob
Scared Monkey
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 4144
View Profile
   
   
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #682 9/24 -
« Reply #7 on: September 24, 2007, 01:28:40 PM »

   Reply with quoteQuote
"Since no one was able to make the connection (and I'm surprised, everyone must be having and off day) I will.

North Korea has no money. Zip, Zilch, NaDa! Unless you consider them printing OUR currency a free foreign aid program.

They print the money using equipment available to only a few countries in the world. (And no, I do not know how they or the Iranians got their hands on it, I think that is a big question). This equipment to produce money is very high tech and used by only a few governments. The Iranians have somehow got the same equipment. They also print 100 dollars bills and when Warren Christopher was Sec of Defense he declared it an act of war. So know you know how and why Bill Clinton made Aruba a target all the way back in 1996 or 1998. (I forget which year off the top of my head).

I also, believe that the US Treasury also produces all the Aruban Florins. So they like money that is not counterfeited.

Back to the connection.

When the North Koreans flip the switch on the printing that's just the start. The fake money is then stored until there is a lot of it. Like a few hundred million. Then the fake money needs to enter the flow of commerce.

They need an accomplice willing to distribute the money. Enter ARUBA and their corrupt banking system.

After Aruba gets the money, they exchange with North Korea a percent. Aruba may receive 15 percent or more. Possibly as much as 30 percent. Could be as high as 50 percent.

100 dollar bill - counterfeit.
-50 given to Aruba
-50 given back to North Korea in CLEAN AMERICAN DOLLARS -  THE REAL ONES THEY GET FROM GAMBLING AND ALL THE OTHER CROOKED STUFF THAT HAPPENS ON THAT ISLAND.

The clean American dollars (the actual real money) goes into building the North Korean Nuke Program.

So, North Korea basically declares war on the USA by counterfeiting out currency and that currency the gets moved around in the Aruban banking system (Banco De Carribe and Aru-bank and a few others) then gets co-mingled with real money that makes it's way to SA and back to North America where it is promptly rounded up as counterfeit.

This scheme involving the North Koreans will not work unless you have a lawless nation with access to real American money. (Another reason to boycott that dump).

It would not work with a nation like Dominica. Not enough real American Dollars in circulation. You need a vast sum.

So how much?

Billions. You need access to a country that has or has access to billions of America dollars.

And that is why Aruba is chosen, and is a willing participant.

So how did this stop the investigation? This like be my opinion.

It (the investigation) got derailed because North Korea was the major cog here. There was a diplomatic effort over the last 10 years to get North Korea to dismantle a program that no one is sure was ever real. They did explode a high amount of something, but no one knows if it was a nuke or not. If it was, it was low level yield. A small nuke. If it was even that at all.

No one in the State Dept was going to take Aruba apart while that effort was on going.

And while there is an agreement between North Korea and the 6 Party Nations to disarm they are up to their old shenanigans again. No one is sure they will totally disarm.

So, you have a price to pay. Do you allow a few billion dollars to go through a God Less little death trap in exchange for an entire region being Nuke Free and getting those weapons out of the hands of a madman? And in turn leave that little rock alone for the time being?

That question is easy to answer from a State Dept view point. Of course you do.

We are talking about the lives of over a billion people involved here.

It's obvious that the US Federal Gov't has known about this scheme for quite sometime and has decided negotiation  is the correct route.

Looks like Natalee and her family did get caught in something bigger than any of us imagine at the time.
Rob
Scared Monkey
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 4144


So how did this stop the investigation? This like be my opinion.

It (the investigation) got derailed because North Korea was the major cog here. There was a diplomatic effort over the last 10 years to get North Korea to dismantle a program that no one is sure was ever real. They did explode a high amount of something, but no one knows if it was a nuke or not. If it was, it was low level yield. A small nuke. If it was even that at all.

No one in the State Dept was going to take Aruba apart while that effort was on going.

And while there is an agreement between North Korea and the 6 Party Nations to disarm they are up to their old shenanigans again. No one is sure they will totally disarm.

So, you have a price to pay. Do you allow a few billion dollars to go through a God Less little death trap in exchange for an entire region being Nuke Free and getting those weapons out of the hands of a madman? And in turn leave that little rock alone for the time being?

That question is easy to answer from a State Dept view point. Of course you do.

We are talking about the lives of over a billion people involved here.

It's obvious that the US Federal Gov't has known about this scheme for quite sometime and has decided negotiation  is the correct route.

Looks like Natalee and her family did get caught in something bigger than any of us imagine at the time."

[/quote]
I think Rob has it nailed.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Dayhiker on January 07, 2008, 09:44:52 AM

Just last week Judge Wit said that Police Chief Dompig obstructed the Investigation and didn't want them searching the Van Der Sloot property. He said they wanted to protect Paul Van Der Sloots privacy!!!Then said that the OM didn't request to search the property outside of Jorans Apt or anything in the future!! He admitted they waited 16 days to search the house then blocked everything except the jorans lil apt and 2 cars. Do they think we are stupid? A heavy weight judge just admitted Dompig obstructed the Investigation,they protected the main suspects and the prosecuters office did nothing except cover up a murder. This was just a week after they announced the case was cold/closed....You have got to be kidding me!


Good observation *******. Where was Judge Bob Wit in December 2005 when Dompig announced (after six months of  keeping it a secret) that the judge denied a full search of the premises? Why is he speaking out now, because the case is closed?

Somebody is lying. Dompig and Jannsen either lied to the international media or Judge Wit is lying his ass off to try to cover his tail.

Does this prove the cover-up or what??????


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: private eye on January 07, 2008, 10:27:15 AM
Quote
Heli from RU write this
In addition, the suggestion that Deepak cut out or otherwise removed
portions of the interior of the car as a means of foiling detection of
physical evidence, merely shows the ignorance of All10.

Let's assume portions of the upholstery or headliner were removed
to get rid of bio evidence of foul play. Be assured that any new fabric,
carpet or seats would be readily detected by forensic examiners. Anything
recently installed in or on that car could easily be identified as such and
followed up on by ALE. There was nothing of evidenciary value!  

Were we not told that Deepaks cars radio was installed there for he had all the carpets replaced in order to run the wiring?  All the guy at the Auto place could talk about was how Deepak didnt mention a licence or the girl........Duhhhh, NO they didnt follow up on that at all IMO

But I always thought that the Aruban authorities actually tampered with the evidence prior to shipping it to Holland. As such, and if you believe that they did, I don't think we can expect them to uncover any irregular activities by Deepak in connection with this case, even though it would take very little forensics to determine this. I always assumed that replaced the original blood stained swatch of fabric with another sample of the uphostery stained with chocolate. If you cut a 4 inch square originally, cut it down to 2 or simply cut an additional sample. They would have replaced the interior afterwards to ensure that no additional forensic evidence would be found.

I don't thin that the word cover up is even appropriate any more. The Aruban authorities destroyed this evidence knowing that we would know that they did, and knowing that there is nothing that we can do. Over and over the evidence needed to convict the boys was discovered by the diligence, committment, and professionalism of their detectives, efficiently, and they then did just as good of a job either destroying the evidence that they had collected. Then saying what evidence? We need to know of any and all evidence so that we may collect and destroy it. Confession? Time out, the prisoner has broke. Call his parents so that they can come counsel him to cease talking, recant the confession, and recover from his remose.

It is a stretch usually to blame the parents for the path a child takes in life, but in this case and the direction that this young man chose, he chose to take this direction because his parents chose it for him. My belief in this is the recording in the police car in which Joran says plainly that he is doing what his parents have instructed him to do. There were several other roads he could have taken. However, most children only listen to their parents when they encounter trouble for which they are guilty and look to the parents to take care of the problem. The interuption of the confession followed by the visits from his parents, followed predictably by his subsequent refusal to sign the confession, his recanting of the confession, and his refusal to speak anymore to the authorities seem to indicate that he is on their path as well.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 07, 2008, 10:39:45 AM
all hope is not lost, i once waited years for something.  :cool:

i have seen things in my life that many people would say... "that will never happen"

sure, it may never happen but it you "shake it up" you dont always get the same thing out of the mix....lets keep shaking

shake shake it some more.

Natalee was murdered, it was covered up, and people know this.

it was not done by 1 person. probably not even done by 2 people.

that is a powerful thing on our side...

justice is right around the corner  :cool:


Roberts ... I agree completely with your post.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: private eye on January 07, 2008, 10:43:46 AM

Just last week Judge Wit said that Police Chief Dompig obstructed the Investigation and didn't want them searching the Van Der Sloot property. He said they wanted to protect Paul Van Der Sloots privacy!!!Then said that the OM didn't request to search the property outside of Jorans Apt or anything in the future!! He admitted they waited 16 days to search the house then blocked everything except the jorans lil apt and 2 cars. Do they think we are stupid? A heavy weight judge just admitted Dompig obstructed the Investigation,they protected the main suspects and the prosecuters office did nothing except cover up a murder. This was just a week after they announced the case was cold/closed....You have got to be kidding me!


Good observation *******. Where was Judge Bob Wit in December 2005 when Dompig announced (after six months of  keeping it a secret) that the judge denied a full search of the premises? Why is he speaking out now, because the case is closed?

Somebody is lying. Dompig and Jannsen either lied to the international media or Judge Wit is lying his ass off to try to cover his tail.

Does this prove the cover-up or what??????


If Judge Wit believed that justice was obstructed by the Cheif of Police, why doesn't he order an investigation of the investigation and prosecute people who committed obstruction of justice? Especially if it includes the police or prosecutor, even the minister of justice?

Furthermore, Judge Wit just told us he determined that a coverup had indeed occurred, with the cooperation of at least the COP.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: private eye on January 07, 2008, 10:46:30 AM

Just last week Judge Wit said that Police Chief Dompig obstructed the Investigation and didn't want them searching the Van Der Sloot property. He said they wanted to protect Paul Van Der Sloots privacy!!!Then said that the OM didn't request to search the property outside of Jorans Apt or anything in the future!! He admitted they waited 16 days to search the house then blocked everything except the jorans lil apt and 2 cars. Do they think we are stupid? A heavy weight judge just admitted Dompig obstructed the Investigation,they protected the main suspects and the prosecuters office did nothing except cover up a murder. This was just a week after they announced the case was cold/closed....You have got to be kidding me!


Good observation *******. Where was Judge Bob Wit in December 2005 when Dompig announced (after six months of  keeping it a secret) that the judge denied a full search of the premises? Why is he speaking out now, because the case is closed?

Somebody is lying. Dompig and Jannsen either lied to the international media or Judge Wit is lying his ass off to try to cover his tail.

Does this prove the cover-up or what??????


If Judge Wit believed that justice was obstructed by the Cheif of Police, why doesn't he order an investigation of the investigation and prosecute people who committed obstruction of justice? Especially if it includes the police or prosecutor, even the minister of justice?

Furthermore, Judge Wit just told us he determined that a coverup had indeed occurred, with the cooperation of at least the COP.

Why did Judge Wit, when faced with a judgment call concerning the search of the VDS, choose the path most likely to create an appearance of impropriety by choosing the path to limit the exposure of a citizen he knew professionally and personally, in direct violation of his Code of Ethics?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: private eye on January 07, 2008, 10:57:06 AM
Organized crime is interested in any "work" that brings it huge profits, regardless of how many are hurt or how wrong it is. Just like Rob's post that accuses Aruba of being involved somehow in the introduction of counterfeit money into the US by Korea, it is not a stretch to see Aruba's controlling gangsters doing business with terrorists including the shipping of materials for them into our borders. Remember Aruba believes it is our responsibility to protect our own borders concerning the role of Aruba as a staging cite and washing machine for drug money resulting from the US drug business originating in Aruba or with the help of Aruba. Aruba believes Beth was stupid for allowing her teenage daughter to travel there for a graduation trip. They knew something she didn't obviously.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Dayhiker on January 07, 2008, 11:05:36 AM

If Judge Wit believed that justice was obstructed by the Cheif of Police, why doesn't he order an investigation of the investigation and prosecute people who committed obstruction of justice? Especially if it includes the police or prosecutor, even the minister of justice?

Furthermore, Judge Wit just told us he determined that a coverup had indeed occurred, with the cooperation of at least the COP.

Why did Judge Wit, when faced with a judgment call concerning the search of the VDS, choose the path most likely to create an appearance of impropriety by choosing the path to limit the exposure of a citizen he knew professionally and personally, in direct violation of his Code of Ethics?


At the very least Judge Wit should have spoken up to defend himself in December 2005 when HE WAS ACCUSED OF LIMITING THE SEARCH. Nada. Nothing. It was all over the media and he did nothing, he let the statements calling him corrupt stand for two years? He is supposed to be a man of justice and he let lies stand? I doubt it.

I find Wit's accusations now after the case is closed to be highly suspicious but knowing his, Jannsen's and Dompig's lack of credibility and integrity it wouldn't surprise me at all if ALL THREE were in on the limited search along with prosecution official Ben Vocking.

Bigger question, why have the Dutch ignored all this?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: msmarple on January 07, 2008, 11:12:24 AM
http://news.diario-aruba.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=blogcategory&id=13&Itemid=30 (http://news.diario-aruba.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=blogcategory&id=13&Itemid=30)
Link is to the Local section of Diario.

Very busy weekend for ALE.


Man NR attacked as he leaves night club; his girlfriend SKB witnessed; two bad guys.

Quote
Testigo a mira atacantenan di un dama hulandes       
Monday, 07 January 2008 

ORANJESTAD (AAN): Diadomingo mainta trempan a presenta na Warda di Polis Oranjestad dos hende muher cu ta N.R. di 32 aña naci na Hulanda, y S.K.B. naci na Merca di 21 aña e ultimo ta traha abordo di un crusero.

Nan a presenta na warda pa entrega denuncia di atraco.

E mucha muher N.R. a bisa cu mas o menos 2’or di marduga nan tabata na un night club. Pa alrededor di 4 or nan a sali un homber desconoci a presenta y a golpia N.R. consecuentemente e sla tabata asina fuerte cu el a bay for di tino.

Su amiga S.K.B. kende a bin yude a worde ataca pa un otro homber desconoci di patras.

Segun e mucha muher te asina leu por a saca afor lo tin un auto preto modelo liftback eybanda, y pesey nan a grita y direpiente e atacantenan a take off, laga nan benta na vloer.

Probablemente esnan den e vehiculo por ta meti den e asalto. Mey mey di e hombernan tabatin un hende muher cu a bay cu un tas preto.

Bon di tur esaki ta cu tin testigo cu a reconoce un di e malhechornan. E caso tin debido atencion y a base di informe compila sigur lo soluciona e caso aki.

Online Pap translation:

witness owing to see atacantenan of one lady dutch
monday, 07 january 2008

oranjestad (aan): diadomingo morning trempan owing to present at keep of police oranjestad two person muher cu is n.r. of 32 year naci at the netherlands, y s.k.b. naci at merca of 21 year the ultimo is work abordo of one crusero.

they owing to present at keep for entrega denuncia of atraco.

the child muher n.r. owing to tell cu more or less 2’or of marduga they was at one night club. for alrededor of 4 or they owing to leave one man desconoci owing to present y owing to golpia n.r. consecuentemente the sla was so strong cu past owing to bay for of tino.

his girlfriend s.k.b. that owing to come yude owing to worde ataca for one another man desconoci of behind.

according the child muher till so far can owing to saca afor will have one car black model liftback eybanda, y pesey they owing to bark y all of a sudden the atacantenan owing to take off, let they throw at vloer.

probably esnan in the vehiculo can is meti in the asalto. mey mey of the hombernan had a muher cu owing to bay cu one bag black.

good of all this is cu have witness cu owing to reconoce one of the malhechornan. the caso have debido atencion y owing to base of informe compila assure will soluciona the caso here.

* * *

Male Canadian tourist attacked at highrise beach.

Quote
Homber desconoci a haci acto inmoral cu turista       
Monday, 07 January 2008 

ORANJESTAD (AAN): Un muher turista Canades a spanta su alma ora cu riba beach, basta laat di marduga, el a worde ataca pa un homber color scur bisti cu jeans, t-shirt preto y cora.

E turista a bisa cu e homber tabatin un rug tas den su poder.

Ta asina segun e muher Canades ora e ta cana riba e beach di un Highrise Hotel, un individuo a yega cerca di dje y a tira man riba su parti intimo.

E bishitante a reacciona y a pone e individuo move rapido for di e lugar.

Corectamente e turista a reporta e caso na guardianan di seguridad y polis a worde envolvi pa atende e caso.

Online Pap translation:

man desconoci owing to haci acto inmoral cu tourist
monday, 07 january 2008

oranjestad (aan): one muher tourist canades owing to spanta his soul hour cu on beach, enough late of marduga, past owing to worde ataca for one man color dark dress cu jeans, t-shirt black y cora.

the tourist owing to tell cu he had one rug bag {carpet bag?} in his power.

is so according the muher canades hour the is march on the beach of one highrise hotel, one individual owing to arrive close of dje y owing to throw hand on his part intimo.

the bishitante owing to reacciona y owing to place the individual actuate rapido for of the lugar.

corectamente the tourist owing to reporta the caso at guardianan of seguridad y police owing to worde envolvi for atende the caso.

* * *

I think we posted this incident Friday or Saturday. Apparently there are 3 arrests (4 perps). 4 men attacked/beat a man who was found in a night club parking lot. Weststraat usually suggests (to me) C&C's.

Quote
Polis a haya homber na sanger banda di nightclub       
Monday, 07 January 2008 

ORANJESTAD (AAN): Den fin di siman, asistencia di Polis a worde pidi den Weststraat den e asina yama hot zone.   Parce pariba di e parkinglot di un di e nightclubnan tabatin pelea.

Ora cu polis a presenta, a mira hendenan sali na careda bandona e lugar direccion Royal Plaza.

Tabata tin informe cu cuatro homber a bati un homber , un di e hombernan a saca un cuchio y a staca e victima, un tal Betto C. di 22 aña.

Riba vloer bao di sanger polis a localiza e victima aki. E tabatin un hinca na su banda drechi di su barica.

E cuatro hombernan ta color scur nan tabata lomba sunu sin camisa.

Debi cu no kier a spera riba ambulans amigo (nan) di e victima a transporte pa Hospital.

Pero e bon noticia ta cu un di e cuatro hombernan segun bon fuente a worde reconoce di ta alumno di EPB.

Por ultimo tin detencion cu a cay, polis a detene tres hoben cual dos ta local inicialnan A.S.P.T. di 17 aña, E.A.P. y un Venezolano di inicialnan A.R.I. di 18 aña.

Tur esnan deteni fiscal lo evalua si nan lo keda deteni of no.

Online Pap translation:

police owing to achieve man at blood near of nightclub
monday, 07 january 2008

oranjestad (aan): in end of week, asistencia of police owing to worde ask in weststraat in the so calling hot zone. seems east of the parkinglot of one of the nightclubnan had action.

hour cu police owing to present, owing to see hendenan leave at careda bandona the lugar direccion royal plaza.

was have informe cu cuatro man owing to beat one man, one of the hombernan owing to saca one cuchio y owing to staca the victima, one such betto c. of 22 year.

on vloer bao of blood police owing to localiza the victima here. the had one hinca at his near right of his barica.

the cuatro hombernan is color dark they was back sunu without camisa.

debi cu does not owing to wait for on ambulance amigo (nan) of the victima owing to transporte for hospital.

but the good news is cu one of the cuatro hombernan according good fountain owing to worde reconoce of is alumno of epb.

can ultimo have detencion cu owing to cay, police owing to detene three young cual two is local inicialnan a.s.p.t. of 17 year, e.a.p. y one venezolano of inicialnan owing a.r.i. of 18 year.

all esnan deteni fiscal will evalua if they will stay deteni or not.

* * *

Quote
Homber a spanta di un muher di bida       
Monday, 07 January 2008 

ORANJESTAD (AAN): Diasabra mainta a presenta na Warda di Polis na San Nicolas e homber di inicialnan A.S.C. di 36 aña.   Segun version di e compay aki, e tabata coriendo den su auto y na altura di un bar el a dal para pa combersa cu un muher di bida.

E homber a bisa polis cu e muher a papia masha grosero cune, y esey a pone rabia y hasta el a baha for di auto pa atende e muher di bida alegre.

Pero e muher segun e homber a bisa, a saca un arma blanco pa cual A.S.C. a spanta y a core subi su auto direccion pa warda.

Awor ASC ta pidi polis pa nan papia cu e muher. Polis a bay na e bar y a logra localiza e muher encuestion.

E muher di inicialnan KGO naci na Colombia a conta polis e otro banda di medaya.

Segun e muher a splica polis, cu e tabata para riba un rust pafor, y ta e homber a bin papia palabranan masha ofensivo, pa cual ey a rabia y a zundra e tipo aki.

Encuanto e posible ‘cuchio’, e no ta ningun arma blanco den su poder.

Online Pap translation:

man owing to spanta of one muher of life
monday, 07 january 2008

oranjestad (aan): saturday morning owing to present at keep of police at san nicolas he of inicialnan owing a.s.c. of 36 year. according version of the compay here, the was coriendo in his car y at height of one bar past owing to strike stop for combersa cu one muher of life.

he owing to tell police cu the muher owing to talk very rude cune, y esey owing to place angry y even past owing to descend for of car for atende the muher of life cheerful.

but the muher according he owing to tell, owing to saca one arm blanco for cual owing a.s.c. owing to spanta y owing to core lever his car direccion for keep.

now asc is ask police for they talk cu the muher. police owing to bay at the bar y owing to succeed localiza the muher encuestion.

the muher of inicialnan kgo naci at colombia owing to count police the another near of medaya.

according the muher owing to splica police, cu the was stop on one rust abroad, y is he owing to come talk words very ofensivo, for cual ey owing to angry y owing to zundra the type here.

encuanto the posible ‘cuchio’, the do not none arm blanco in his power.

* * *
Best as I can tell, someone took a swipe at a cop at a Weststraat night club.

Quote
bomboshi again abroad of clubnan nocturno

Monday, 07 January 2008 

Mucha muher a keda deteni

ORANJESTAD (AAN): Diasabra marduga central di polis a dirigi patruya den Weststraat na altura di e clubnan nocturno.  E prome informe ta menciona cu ta trata di un pelea.

Patruya cu a presenta mesora na e lugar indica y segun informe suministra a indica e agentenan e persona aparentemente envolvi.

E sospechoso segun e version ta bisti a-la-black and white. Polis a acerca e sospechoso, ta trata di un hende muher inicialnan I.A.C. di 23 aña, el a bira agresivo y na dado momento a manda mokete den direccion di e agente.

Polis a tene, y apesar cu el a resisti, nan a detene y hibe Warda y a sere segun version policial ta menciona.

Parce cu cos tabata hot den Weststraat den oranan di marduga.

Hasta patruya encarga cu Santa Cruz a bay te Oranjestad, pa asisti na coleganan. Pero ora cu e patruya concerni a presenta ya coleganan di polis a bay cu un sospechoso.

Parce cu tin hende ta meti den pelea y hasta boter a worde tira. Durante cu patruya ta stacion y observa e situacion, ta presenta un homber di nowhere y a habri porta patras di e unidad Policial. Polisnan a reacciona y puntre kico esaki ta para bira, e homber a bisa polis, di a tende cu polis a “bay cu su chick”.

E homber a zundra, pero polis a scual e riba su forma di proceder.

Tambe a presenta un mucha muher y e ultimo a worde pusha. Mientras e mucha homber mes a move for di e lugar.

Awor polis a keda planta cu e mucha muher, su atencion tambe a worde hala y a avise pa no mete den trabao policial, asina tambe e situacion a bin calma.

Online Pap translation:

bomboshi again abroad of clubnan nocturno
monday, 07 january 2008

child muher owing to stay deteni

oranjestad (aan): saturday marduga central of police owing to dirigi patrol in weststraat at height of the clubnan nocturno. the first informe is menciona cu is deal of one action.

patrol cu owing to present at once at the lugar indica y according informe suministra owing to indica the agentenan the person apparently envolvi.

the sospechoso according the version is dress a-la-black and white. police owing to acerca the sospechoso, is deal of a muher inicialnan i.a.c. of 23 year, past owing to become aggressive y at dado instant owing to send fist in direccion of the agent.

police owing to as, y despite cu past owing to resisti, they owing to detene y hibe keep y owing to sere according version policial is menciona.

seems cu cos was hot in weststraat in oranan of marduga.

even patrol encarga cu santa cruz owing to bay till oranjestad, for asisti at coleganan. but hour cu the patrol concerni owing to present already coleganan of police owing to bay cu one sospechoso.

seems cu have person is meti in action y even boter owing to worde throw. during cu patrol is stacion y observa the situation, is present one man of nowhere y owing to open door behind the unidad policial. polisnan owing to reacciona y puntre kico this is stop become, he owing to tell police, of owing to hear cu police owing to “bay cu his chick”.

he owing to zundra, but police owing to scual the on his form of proceder.

also owing to present one child muher y the ultimo owing to worde push. while the boy self owing to actuate for of the lugar.

now police owing to stay plant cu the child muher, his atencion also owing to worde wing y owing to avise for not mete in trabao policial, so also the situation owing to come calma.

* * *
Man takes his child's 15-yr-old babysitter out to a night club; then violates her ...

Quote
Muher a viola su babysitter di 15 aña       
Monday, 07 January 2008 

Caso serio denuncia...

ORANJESTAD (AAN): Riba e potret aki, por mira momento cu Autoridad a escolta un dama, kende a hiba su yiu muher pa control medico.   E mucha inocente di 15 aña, a bira victima di violacion.

Fuentenan bon na altura, dunando detaye na DIARIO, a mustra cu e caso a cuminza cana su caminda legal, como cu denuncia a worde entrega na autoridad di e caso serio.

Te ainda pa prensa, no ta conoci di cual bario nan ta, pero si ta conoci cu e mucha muher ta fungi regularmente como Babysitter pa yiu di e muher aki! Anto awor e ta pasa den e situacion serio aki, y bira victima di violacion na man di un muher di 26 aña di edad.

Con serio e acusacion ta, esey no ta conoci. Pero fuentenan yega a duna di conoce cu e caso di Diasabra madruga a keda reporta na autoridadnan competente.

Pa colmo, ta e muher di 26 aña mes a invita su Babysitter pa nan bay na un Club Nocturno, unda posiblemente el a haya bebida alcoholico pa bebe.

Despues di esey, e muher a viola di e pober mucha muher aki den e area industrial na Eagle.

Investigacion lo tuma su curso y presenta cerca fiscal auxiliar y fiscal pa determina seriedad di e caso pa asina detene esun responsable pa para responde pa su actonan.

Online Pap translation:

muher owing to viola his babysitter of 15 year
monday, 07 january 2008

caso earnest denuncia...

oranjestad (aan): on the potret here, can see instant cu autoridad owing to escolta one lady, that owing to take away his child muher for control medico. the child inocente of 15 year, owing to become victima of violacion.

fuentenan good at height, dunando detaye at daily paper, owing to show cu the caso owing to cuminza march his caminda legal, because; cu denuncia owing to worde entrega at autoridad of the caso earnest.

till still for prensa, do not conoci of cual district they're, but if is conoci cu the child muher is fungi regularly because; babysitter for child of the muher here! then now the is happen in the situation earnest here, y become victima of violacion at hand of one muher of 26 year of edad.

con earnest the acusacion is, esey do not conoci. but fuentenan arrive owing to give of conoce cu the caso of saturday madruga owing to stay reporta at autoridadnan competente.

for colmo, is the muher of 26 year self owing to invita his babysitter for they bay at one club nocturno, where posiblemente past owing to achieve beverage alcoholico for drink.

after of esey, the muher owing to viola of the poor child muher here in the area industrial at eagle.

investigacion will take his curso y present close fiscal auxiliar y fiscal for determina seriedad of the caso for so detene esun responsable for stop responde for his actonan.

* * *

The weekend even included a Molotov cocktail - thrown at a house on Palm Beach ...

Quote
Molotov cocktail tira riba cas na palm beach       
Monday, 07 January 2008 

ORANJESTAD (AAN): Den transcurso di mainta, presencia di polis a worde solicita na un cas situa na Palm Beach. Esaki debi cu segun informe a tuma lugar un intento serio pa kima e cas.

Na yegada agentenan a atende e señora di inicialnan Y.R.P. naci na Colombia y e tin 42 aña.

Segun e señora den oranan di anochi, su dos yiunan a bin cerca dje y a puntre si tur cos ta OK, y bon ya cu nan a scucha sonido poco straño manera cu ta glas a kibra.

Pero ningun no a nota nada pa cual nan a sigui drumi.

Pa sorpresa mainta e famia a bin descubri cu dos boter di cervez kibra cu mecha y ta hole gasolin.
Polis a haci un pregunta general na e famia, si acaso nan lo por tin problema cu hende, a laga sa cu nan no tin problema cu ningun persona.

Recherche y personal tecnico di polis a worde envolvi y asina start cu nan investigacion.

Online Pap translation:

molotov cocktail throw on cas at palm beach
monday, 07 january 2008

oranjestad (aan): in transcurso of morning, presencia of police owing to worde solicita at one cas situa at palm beach. this debi cu according informe did take lugar one attempt earnest for burn the cas.

at arrival agentenan owing to atende the madam of inicialnan y.r.p. naci at colombia y the have 42 year.

according the madam in oranan of night, his two yiunan owing to come close dje y owing to puntre if all cos is ok, y good already cu they owing to listen sonido some odd as cu is glass owing to break.

but none not owing to notice nothing for cual they owing to follow sleep.

for surprise morning the family owing to come descubri cu two boter of cervez break cu mecha y is smell gasolene.
police owing to haci one question general at the family, if acaso they will can have problem cu person, owing to let know cu they not have problem cu none person.

recherche y personal tecnico of police owing to worde envolvi y so start cu they investigacion.

* * *


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: private eye on January 07, 2008, 11:13:49 AM

If Judge Wit believed that justice was obstructed by the Cheif of Police, why doesn't he order an investigation of the investigation and prosecute people who committed obstruction of justice? Especially if it includes the police or prosecutor, even the minister of justice?

Furthermore, Judge Wit just told us he determined that a coverup had indeed occurred, with the cooperation of at least the COP.

Why did Judge Wit, when faced with a judgment call concerning the search of the VDS, choose the path most likely to create an appearance of impropriety by choosing the path to limit the exposure of a citizen he knew professionally and personally, in direct violation of his Code of Ethics?


At the very least Judge Wit should have spoken up to defend himself in December 2005 when HE WAS ACCUSED OF LIMITING THE SEARCH. Nada. Nothing. It was all over the media and he did nothing, he let the statements calling him corrupt stand for two years? He is supposed to be a man of justice and he let lies stand? I doubt it.

I find Wit's accusations now after the case is closed to be highly suspicious but knowing his, Jannsen's and Dompig's lack of credibility and integrity it wouldn't surprise me at all if ALL THREE were in on the limited search along with prosecution official Ben Vocking.

Bigger question, why have the Dutch ignored all this?


This may go against popular belief, but I think Wit was forced by Mos, for example his press conference to Holland following the release of the boys, to defend his acts in this case. Mos is the only official with the means to expose the corruption involved with this case. He seems to have at been trying so far.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: msmarple on January 07, 2008, 11:15:12 AM
M&C thread - 47,048 views.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: private eye on January 07, 2008, 11:27:14 AM
Hi TM :)

Sending a post to Kyle and the Team is a great idea. They have been on that ship now approaching 3 weeks and some even longer. Time is ticking and this may be Natalee's best chance for ever coming home. I hope they are not getting discouraged or feeling all alone in this search. I'M a bit sad because I know in my heart Joran has told several people what they did with Natalee. They have to live the rest of there lives knowing they did nothing to help. What's the big deal about Natalee being found? Unless Koen's brothers cell phone is with Natalee,Whats preventing him from making a anonymous email? It's been 31 months now and most humans I would think want to relieve there conscious about what they know.

Right now all that is on my Boycott list is Aruba. But I am highly suspicious what the mother country has been doing with this case since Aug 2006. MOS=FOS as far as I am concerned  :wink: I don't know much about Bonaire and Curacao except they are very similar to Aruba. I would be stunned if either Govt is 1/10th as Evil as the Aruban Govt.

P.S.
I like the way you think  :lol:

They have no reason to feel discouraged even if they find nothing because they will at least have in all probability eliminated all theories involving her disposal at sea, in what was thought to be an unsearchable location. They are accomplishing huge results period, finding or not finding, and I know that they deserve a great big thanks, not just from Beth and her supporters, but that thanks should also be coming from Aruba and her institutions. THE PERSITENCE IS DOING THE WORK FOR ARUBA, AT EXPENSE OF THE OWNER OF THE PERSISTENCE. OR DOES ARUBA WANT THEM TO BILL ARUBA FOR THEIR WORK? HAS ARUBA THANKED STILVETTI OR EXPRESSED APPRECIATION THE DONATION HE IS MAKING TO ARUBA?

DOES ANYONE REALLY THINK THAT ARUBA APPRECIATES THIS HELP AND HAS ACTED APPRECIATIVE OF IT? DON'T YOU THINK A PRUDENT PROSECUTOR AND MINISTER OF JUSTICE WOULD HAVE WORKED WITH THE BOAT AS THERE ARE BOUND TO BE UNSOLVED CRIMES IN ARUBA THAT ALLEGEDLY INCLUDE THE DISPOSAL OF EVIDENCE IN THIS DEEP WATER AND THIS BOAT IS PHOTOGRAPHING THE SEA BED AND COULD RETRIEVE EVIDENCE THAT ARUBA PREVIOUSLY COULD NOT RETRIEVE?
HELL NO, THAT IS WHY THEY DUMP THEIR EVIDENCE THERE? A CRAB TRAP AND THAT DEEP WATER CAN'T BE THE ORIGINAL THOUGHT OF THESE CROOKS.

SPEAKING OF THE MINISTER OF JUSTICE, I WISH GRETA WOULD INVESTIGATE RUDY'S QUALIFICATION TO LEARN WHAT LAW SCHOOL HE GRADUATED FROM.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 07, 2008, 11:28:47 AM
Our household has always felt that the underworld has a stronghold on Aruba.  IBE's reposting of Rob's theory on Korea and money laundering doesn't change that thought. 

Last night, many, like ourselves may have watched 60 Minutes to see what Clemens had to say to Mike Wallace.  As an extra bonus, I found the segment with John Martorano more interesting because it made me think of this case and Joran, Paulus and others knowing things but chosing not to state anything.  The segment with Martorano, page 3, in the following link, shows the mentality with regard to informants/rats....if you didn't see it, there is a video,or you can read the transcript.  The code of silence....

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/01/03/60minutes/main3672273.shtml



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: private eye on January 07, 2008, 11:34:30 AM
Our household has always felt that the underworld has a stronghold on Aruba.  IBE's reposting of Rob's theory on Korea and money laundering doesn't change that thought. 

Last night, many, like ourselves may have watched 60 Minutes to see what Clemens had to say to Mike Wallace.  As an extra bonus, I found the segment with John Martorano more interesting because it made me think of this case and Joran, Paulus and others knowing things but chosing not to state anything.  The segment with Martorano, page 3, in the following link, shows the mentality with regard to informants/rats....if you didn't see it, there is a video,or you can read the transcript.  The code of silence....

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/01/03/60minutes/main3672273.shtml



Aruba has the laws to allow her to jail indefinitely witness who refuse to talk, according to Amnest International in their files concerning the law of the Netherlands Antilles and how to incorporate that law in following the terms of their treaty.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: private eye on January 07, 2008, 11:36:02 AM
We should mail that man in the CBS article a copy of the reward and a round trip ticket to Aruba and Holland.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 07, 2008, 11:38:40 AM

Just last week Judge Wit said that Police Chief Dompig obstructed the Investigation and didn't want them searching the Van Der Sloot property. He said they wanted to protect Paul Van Der Sloots privacy!!!Then said that the OM didn't request to search the property outside of Jorans Apt or anything in the future!! He admitted they waited 16 days to search the house then blocked everything except the jorans lil apt and 2 cars. Do they think we are stupid? A heavy weight judge just admitted Dompig obstructed the Investigation,they protected the main suspects and the prosecuters office did nothing except cover up a murder. This was just a week after they announced the case was cold/closed....You have got to be kidding me!


Good observation *******. Where was Judge Bob Wit in December 2005 when Dompig announced (after six months of  keeping it a secret) that the judge denied a full search of the premises? Why is he speaking out now, because the case is closed?

Somebody is lying. Dompig and Jannsen either lied to the international media or Judge Wit is lying his ass off to try to cover his tail.

Does this prove the cover-up or what??????


Dayhiker ... you bet it does!  It was a coverup to protect Joran and Paulus from the getgo.

There was no comparision in regard to the apprehension of the security guards and ... the search of their respective homes.  Also ... FBI were involved and ... no judge was present ... only Karin Janssen ... the prosecutor.
 
Janet

+++++++++++++

Associated Press
June 6, 2005


Two security guards from a hotel near where Holloway was staying were arrested Sunday. Aruban police in unmarked cars accompanied by FBI agents arrested the suspects, ages 30 and 28, during a pre-dawn raid.

An AP photographer watched as the rumpled men — one from the De Vuiyst housing project for poorer islanders and another from an average home in southeast San Nicolas — emerged without resistance, hands cuffed behind their backs.  

Police searched the homes and emerged with what looked like a metal safe deposit box and a garbage bag of clothing.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2005-06-06-aruba-monday_x.htm


Associated Press
June 7, 2005


Authorities searched the men's homes and impounded three vehicles, carrying away bags of items. Authorities said they had not found any of Holloway's belongings at the suspects' homes, but an eight-member team of FBI agents supporting the investigation was to help perform forensic testing.  http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/world/20050607-0713-aruba-missingteen.html


CNN SUNDAY MORNING
June 5, 2005


DILMA ARENDS, REPORTER: Yes, we were part of a group of local reporters who received the tip since yesterday, and we were able to intercept a large caravan of local police officers who raided two homes in St. Nicholas (ph). The first one the whole group went there. They went into the house. Once they got out of the house they started checking two cars and then some police officers stayed at that house. We weren't able to see very well, but we saw the police detaining one person, handcuffing that person and a couple of officers stayed behind with that person and the caravan continued on to another house in downtown St. Nicholas and that's when they were joined by another local detective, who was accompanied by three FBI agents.

This operation was done by local police officers. And, I mean, they did the standard procedures. They knocked on the door. They told them -- they identified themselves, went into the house and start searching. As a matter of fact, there were two dogs barking. They even told the owners of he house or the inhabitants there to -- the residence there to keep the dogs calm. And it went pretty calm. I mean there was no resistance.

They immediately went in and they were accompanied by the person in charge, district attorney Karen Janssen. And they did a search and after half an hour or so came out with another man, also in handcuffs. While he was led out other agents stay there and combed the whole house and we saw them taking out bags of stuff. What they were, we don't know.
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0506/05/sm.02.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: private eye on January 07, 2008, 11:43:52 AM

Just last week Judge Wit said that Police Chief Dompig obstructed the Investigation and didn't want them searching the Van Der Sloot property. He said they wanted to protect Paul Van Der Sloots privacy!!!Then said that the OM didn't request to search the property outside of Jorans Apt or anything in the future!! He admitted they waited 16 days to search the house then blocked everything except the jorans lil apt and 2 cars. Do they think we are stupid? A heavy weight judge just admitted Dompig obstructed the Investigation,they protected the main suspects and the prosecuters office did nothing except cover up a murder. This was just a week after they announced the case was cold/closed....You have got to be kidding me!


Good observation *******. Where was Judge Bob Wit in December 2005 when Dompig announced (after six months of  keeping it a secret) that the judge denied a full search of the premises? Why is he speaking out now, because the case is closed?

Somebody is lying. Dompig and Jannsen either lied to the international media or Judge Wit is lying his ass off to try to cover his tail.

Does this prove the cover-up or what??????


Dayhiker ... you bet it does!  It was a coverup to protect Joran and Paulus from the getgo.

There was no comparision in regard to the apprehension of the security guards and ... the search of their respective homes.  Also ... FBI were involved and ... no judge was present ... only Karin Janssen ... the prosecutor.
 
Janet

+++++++++++++

Associated Press
June 6, 2005


Two security guards from a hotel near where Holloway was staying were arrested Sunday. Aruban police in unmarked cars accompanied by FBI agents arrested the suspects, ages 30 and 28, during a pre-dawn raid.

An AP photographer watched as the rumpled men — one from the De Vuiyst housing project for poorer islanders and another from an average home in southeast San Nicolas — emerged without resistance, hands cuffed behind their backs.  

Police searched the homes and emerged with what looked like a metal safe deposit box and a garbage bag of clothing.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2005-06-06-aruba-monday_x.htm


Associated Press
June 7, 2005


Authorities searched the men's homes and impounded three vehicles, carrying away bags of items. Authorities said they had not found any of Holloway's belongings at the suspects' homes, but an eight-member team of FBI agents supporting the investigation was to help perform forensic testing.  http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/world/20050607-0713-aruba-missingteen.html


CNN SUNDAY MORNING
June 5, 2005


DILMA ARENDS, REPORTER: Yes, we were part of a group of local reporters who received the tip since yesterday, and we were able to intercept a large caravan of local police officers who raided two homes in St. Nicholas (ph). The first one the whole group went there. They went into the house. Once they got out of the house they started checking two cars and then some police officers stayed at that house. We weren't able to see very well, but we saw the police detaining one person, handcuffing that person and a couple of officers stayed behind with that person and the caravan continued on to another house in downtown St. Nicholas and that's when they were joined by another local detective, who was accompanied by three FBI agents.

This operation was done by local police officers. And, I mean, they did the standard procedures. They knocked on the door. They told them -- they identified themselves, went into the house and start searching. As a matter of fact, there were two dogs barking. They even told the owners of he house or the inhabitants there to -- the residence there to keep the dogs calm. And it went pretty calm. I mean there was no resistance.

They immediately went in and they were accompanied by the person in charge, district attorney Karen Janssen. And they did a search and after half an hour or so came out with another man, also in handcuffs. While he was led out other agents stay there and combed the whole house and we saw them taking out bags of stuff. What they were, we don't know.
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0506/05/sm.02.html

But where was the judge? Doesn't he attend all searches to limit the exposure of the accused??????????????


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: private eye on January 07, 2008, 11:45:57 AM
And Jansen was already at the location with the owners of the PVS property before the searchers arrived? But I bet she never told PVS what was oming. Neither her or the judge I bet. I guess she was late on this search and she had to lead it instead of waiting for them. Bad hair day????????????


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: private eye on January 07, 2008, 11:48:51 AM
They apparently could have searched the VDS property and the Kalpoe property on June 1 as they had more credible reasons to think the j2k party was guilty, and according to their protocol established in the SG arrests, and in accordance to the procedures of all civilized professional police departments should have.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 07, 2008, 11:49:35 AM
Our household has always felt that the underworld has a stronghold on Aruba.  IBE's reposting of Rob's theory on Korea and money laundering doesn't change that thought. 

Last night, many, like ourselves may have watched 60 Minutes to see what Clemens had to say to Mike Wallace.  As an extra bonus, I found the segment with John Martorano more interesting because it made me think of this case and Joran, Paulus and others knowing things but chosing not to state anything.  The segment with Martorano, page 3, in the following link, shows the mentality with regard to informants/rats....if you didn't see it, there is a video,or you can read the transcript.  The code of silence....

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/01/03/60minutes/main3672273.shtml



Aruba has the laws to allow her to jail indefinitely witness who refuse to talk, according to Amnest International in their files concerning the law of the Netherlands Antilles and how to incorporate that law in following the terms of their treaty.

Yes, true...the key word though is 'witness'.  Suspects can lie their azz off or say zip....& Paulus chose the option not to give any info regarding his sporter, iirc.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: private eye on January 07, 2008, 11:51:03 AM
Everyone should be proud to be a "Monkey." Monkeys make the world a better place::))))))))))))) CYA


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: private eye on January 07, 2008, 11:52:52 AM
Our household has always felt that the underworld has a stronghold on Aruba.  IBE's reposting of Rob's theory on Korea and money laundering doesn't change that thought. 

Last night, many, like ourselves may have watched 60 Minutes to see what Clemens had to say to Mike Wallace.  As an extra bonus, I found the segment with John Martorano more interesting because it made me think of this case and Joran, Paulus and others knowing things but chosing not to state anything.  The segment with Martorano, page 3, in the following link, shows the mentality with regard to informants/rats....if you didn't see it, there is a video,or you can read the transcript.  The code of silence....

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/01/03/60minutes/main3672273.shtml



Aruba has the laws to allow her to jail indefinitely witness who refuse to talk, according to Amnest International in their files concerning the law of the Netherlands Antilles and how to incorporate that law in following the terms of their treaty.

Yes, true...the key word though is 'witness'.  Suspects can lie their azz off or say zip....& Paulus chose the option not to give any info regarding his sporter, iirc.

But now they are now suspects. So they could be treated as witness to crimes committed by the other


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: private eye on January 07, 2008, 11:54:22 AM
I wonder who the judge was that signed the search warrant of the SG?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: private eye on January 07, 2008, 11:56:38 AM
If it was Wit, then a complaint should be filed with the Carribean Court that Wit violated the ethics of his position by creating the perception of preferential treatment to a person who worked with him for years in the legal system of Aruba in the execution of the search warrant. The delay and the limiting of search.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: MumInOhio on January 07, 2008, 12:00:17 PM
Talking about searches, I saw this while looking for something else:From the Birmingham News June 4th.

If she is not found by Sunday, the case could become a criminal investigation, said Jules Sambo, a superintendent for the Aruba police.

From Front page June 5th
Rod Wheeler, a talking head, says that someone somewhere is talking to the investigators, and that the police are following up on the leads as he gives them up.

Interesting that Guido was interviewed on June 3rd. 7th. and the 8th about leaving the country.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: private eye on January 07, 2008, 12:00:40 PM
And for failing to prosecute the chief of police after accusing him of obstruction of justice. It seems as if his remarks themselves about heretofore unreleased findings of the judge to the public about this ongoing case violated those cannons as well. I wonder when Dompig is going to file suit against Wit for slander and or libel? And when is the tourism agency going to speak out about the harm Dompig has done to Aruba's tourism by obstructing justice. Or Minister Rudy Croes take action? That is an oxymoron isn't it? Minister Croes? Lightening is sure to follow:))))))))))


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: private eye on January 07, 2008, 12:03:46 PM
Guido and the Wever kids are 2 witnesses who could be held until they talk. Guido is certainly intimately acquainted with Joran being his child hood friend and having been with Joran the next day after her disappearance.

Instead Aruba plays the part of the ignorant chump, what can we do? We know but can't? BS


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 07, 2008, 12:07:37 PM
Our household has always felt that the underworld has a stronghold on Aruba.  IBE's reposting of Rob's theory on Korea and money laundering doesn't change that thought. 

Last night, many, like ourselves may have watched 60 Minutes to see what Clemens had to say to Mike Wallace.  As an extra bonus, I found the segment with John Martorano more interesting because it made me think of this case and Joran, Paulus and others knowing things but chosing not to state anything.  The segment with Martorano, page 3, in the following link, shows the mentality with regard to informants/rats....if you didn't see it, there is a video,or you can read the transcript.  The code of silence....

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/01/03/60minutes/main3672273.shtml



Aruba has the laws to allow her to jail indefinitely witness who refuse to talk, according to Amnest International in their files concerning the law of the Netherlands Antilles and how to incorporate that law in following the terms of their treaty.

Yes, true...the key word though is 'witness'.  Suspects can lie their azz off or say zip....& Paulus chose the option not to give any info regarding his sporter, iirc.

But now they are now suspects. So they could be treated as witness to crimes committed by the other

I wouldn't put any money on this happening...jmo...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: BTgirl on January 07, 2008, 12:09:58 PM
Hi monkeys,

I have recently made a new internet acquaintance - a woman in Britain who is originally from the Netherlands. She does not follow Natalee's case, but if someone gets stuck for something they need translated from Dutch, she might be able to help. I don't want to take advantage of her good nature, but her English is impeccable, and she might be able to give us a little bit of her time. Please let me know if anyone needs me to contact her about a possible translation. Thanks.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Peaches on January 07, 2008, 12:10:55 PM
i was born with a fire in my belly and i cant put it out


 :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:


 :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Didn't Johnny Cash write a song about that? :lol:

Nope, George Strait....http://music.yahoo.com/track/4547814

"A Fire I Can't Put Out"



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: private eye on January 07, 2008, 12:12:39 PM
Our household has always felt that the underworld has a stronghold on Aruba.  IBE's reposting of Rob's theory on Korea and money laundering doesn't change that thought. 

Last night, many, like ourselves may have watched 60 Minutes to see what Clemens had to say to Mike Wallace.  As an extra bonus, I found the segment with John Martorano more interesting because it made me think of this case and Joran, Paulus and others knowing things but chosing not to state anything.  The segment with Martorano, page 3, in the following link, shows the mentality with regard to informants/rats....if you didn't see it, there is a video,or you can read the transcript.  The code of silence....

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/01/03/60minutes/main3672273.shtml



Aruba has the laws to allow her to jail indefinitely witness who refuse to talk, according to Amnest International in their files concerning the law of the Netherlands Antilles and how to incorporate that law in following the terms of their treaty.

Yes, true...the key word though is 'witness'.  Suspects can lie their azz off or say zip....& Paulus chose the option not to give any info regarding his sporter, iirc.

But now they are now suspects. So they could be treated as witness to crimes committed by the other

I wouldn't put any money on this happening...jmo...

I agree, but if they were interested they do have the means to gain more information. IF is the keyword:)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Dayhiker on January 07, 2008, 12:23:16 PM

Good observation *******. Where was Judge Bob Wit in December 2005 when Dompig announced (after six months of  keeping it a secret) that the judge denied a full search of the premises? Why is he speaking out now, because the case is closed?

Somebody is lying. Dompig and Jannsen either lied to the international media or Judge Wit is lying his ass off to try to cover his tail.

Does this prove the cover-up or what??????


Dayhiker ... you bet it does!  It was a coverup to protect Joran and Paulus from the getgo.

There was no comparision in regard to the apprehension of the security guards and ... the search of their respective homes.  Also ... FBI were involved and ... no judge was present ... only Karin Janssen ... the prosecutor.
 
Janet

+++++++++++++



Let's also not forget BEN VOCKING, A DUTCH OFFICIAL WHO WORKED FOR THE PROSECUTOR, was also at the house WITH JUDGE WIT.

Now Judge Wit is pointing the finger at Dompig? Why not point it at KARIN JANNSEN AND BEN VOCKING? They are the ones to make out the search warrants!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: MumInOhio on January 07, 2008, 12:24:03 PM
Guido and the Wever kids are 2 witnesses who could be held until they talk. Guido is certainly intimately acquainted with Joran being his child hood friend and having been with Joran the next day after her disappearance.

Instead Aruba plays the part of the ignorant chump, what can we do? We know but can't? BS

Hi...PI....do you mean the Santos boys or are there more Wevers than we know about?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Dayhiker on January 07, 2008, 12:25:56 PM

But now they are now suspects. So they could be treated as witness to crimes committed by the other

I wouldn't put any money on this happening...jmo...


I wouldn't put my money on the Dutch doing anything. There is no reason to believe they have any morals, ethics, or values nor a system that is worth 2 cents when it comes to providing justice for innocent victims.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: private eye on January 07, 2008, 12:28:20 PM
Guido and the Wever kids are 2 witnesses who could be held until they talk. Guido is certainly intimately acquainted with Joran being his child hood friend and having been with Joran the next day after her disappearance.

Instead Aruba plays the part of the ignorant chump, what can we do? We know but can't? BS

Hi...PI....do you mean the Santos boys or are there more Wevers than we know about?


OOOOOOOOOps, I couldn't remember Guido's last name but it IS Wever isn't it?? Sorry but they are one and the same:)))))))))


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: private eye on January 07, 2008, 12:32:04 PM
Hi monkeys,

I have recently made a new internet acquaintance - a woman in Britain who is originally from the Netherlands. She does not follow Natalee's case, but if someone gets stuck for something they need translated from Dutch, she might be able to help. I don't want to take advantage of her good nature, but her English is impeccable, and she might be able to give us a little bit of her time. Please let me know if anyone needs me to contact her about a possible translation. Thanks.

She can have a full time job here::)))))


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Dayhiker on January 07, 2008, 12:32:07 PM
Guido and the Wever kids are 2 witnesses who could be held until they talk. Guido is certainly intimately acquainted with Joran being his child hood friend and having been with Joran the next day after her disappearance.

Instead Aruba plays the part of the ignorant chump, what can we do? We know but can't? BS


Then why haven't they done it by now? Would that have not made a better case for the prosecution before Mos went to Aruba?

You have more faith in Mos than I do PI,  :wink:. I just can't buy into anything he has done after the feeble dog and pony show he put on last November/December. Nine months and 5-10 million dollars spent and he goes to Aruba with a few new communication snippets?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: BTgirl on January 07, 2008, 12:44:43 PM
Hi monkeys,

I have recently made a new internet acquaintance - a woman in Britain who is originally from the Netherlands. She does not follow Natalee's case, but if someone gets stuck for something they need translated from Dutch, she might be able to help. I don't want to take advantage of her good nature, but her English is impeccable, and she might be able to give us a little bit of her time. Please let me know if anyone needs me to contact her about a possible translation. Thanks.

She can have a full time job here::)))))

Do you want to know the funny part? She told me she doesn't like the Netherlands and thinks most Dutch people are really rude.  :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 07, 2008, 12:47:00 PM
Was Guido not a suspect as opposed to a witness?  That allows his high priced attorney to lie all he wants and get away with it.  If anyone remembers, Jossy said Dos Santos should be questioned more....didn't happen...never made the connection.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: MumInOhio on January 07, 2008, 12:50:47 PM
Was Guido not a suspect as opposed to a witness?  That allows his high priced attorney to lie all he wants and get away with it.  If anyone remembers, Jossy said Dos Santos should be questioned more....didn't happen...never made the connection.


Lala's...something on your earlier in the week!


Does anyone know what company Natalee went on that boat thing with? TIA


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 07, 2008, 12:52:29 PM
If it was Wit, then a complaint should be filed with the Carribean Court that Wit violated the ethics of his position by creating the perception of preferential treatment to a person who worked with him for years in the legal system of Aruba in the execution of the search warrant. The delay and the limiting of search.


CARIBBEAN COURT OF JUSTICE - CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT
http://www.caribbeancourtofjustice.org/codeofethics.html

I.  PROPRIETY

1.3 A judge shall avoid close personal association with individual members of the legal profession, particularly those who practice in the judge’s court, where such association might reasonably give rise to the suspicion or appearance of favouritism or partiality.

1.4 A judge shall avoid the use of the judge’s residence by a member of the legal profession to receive clients or other members of the legal profession in circumstances that might reasonably give rise to the suspicion or appearance of impropriety on the part of the judge.

1.9 A judge shall not allow the judge’s family, social or other relationships improperly to influence the judge’s judicial conduct and judgment as a judge.

1.10 A judge shall not use or lend the prestige of the judicial office to advance the private interests of the judge, a member of the judge’s family or of anyone else, nor shall a judge permit others to convey the impression that anyone is in a special position improperly to influence the judge in the performance of judicial duties.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 07, 2008, 12:53:38 PM
Hi monkeys,

I have recently made a new internet acquaintance - a woman in Britain who is originally from the Netherlands. She does not follow Natalee's case, but if someone gets stuck for something they need translated from Dutch, she might be able to help. I don't want to take advantage of her good nature, but her English is impeccable, and she might be able to give us a little bit of her time. Please let me know if anyone needs me to contact her about a possible translation. Thanks.

She can have a full time job here::)))))

Do you want to know the funny part? She told me she doesn't like the Netherlands and thinks most Dutch people are really rude.  :lol:


O/T !!!!

Hi BT, love the cow.  He needs a little valentine heart on him to make him sweet.  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 07, 2008, 12:54:34 PM
Was Guido not a suspect as opposed to a witness?  That allows his high priced attorney to lie all he wants and get away with it.  If anyone remembers, Jossy said Dos Santos should be questioned more....didn't happen...never made the connection.


Lala's...something on your earlier in the week!


Does anyone know what company Natalee went on that boat thing with? TIA

What boat thing?  I thought they didn't do the scuba diving thing?  Maybe I have it wrong.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: MumInOhio on January 07, 2008, 12:59:22 PM
From December 26th.....MY post Notice E.A.B.

Anyone know anything about this guy or his interests? Someone this morning was interested and ended up on the front page. Search said +btnG?
ERIC ANTHONY BRETE
SANEWORLD1@SETARNET.AW
22 Dec 1997
04:09:21


From WAVE DANCER charters and ARUBA PRO DIVE If you want to have a great time,diving or sailing and snorkling. Great W.P, keep up the good work we here in aruba need it.

THANK YOU

E.A.BRETE

This from the front page:
Members of the Strategic Communications Task Force

Mr. Olindo Koolman (Senior Advisor)
Mr. Jaap Beaujon (Advisor)
Mr. Serge Mansur (ATIA)
Mr. Greg Peterson (ATIA)
Mr. Jorge Pesquera (AHATA)
Mr. Jeff Lesker (AHATA)
Mr. Alfonso Riveroll (AHATA)
Ms. Myrna Jansen (ATA)
Mr. Rob Smith (Aruba Hospitality & Security Foundation)
Mr. Bill Carson (Banking Sector/AHATA)
Mr. Edwin Roos (Chamber of Commerce)
Mr. Ruben Trappenberg (Aruba Government)
Mr. Eric Brete (Aruba Government)


Thanks!




http://www.arubawavedancer.com/


Lala's...I just read it somewhere...It was on the Saturday, I think. Will go and find it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: MumInOhio on January 07, 2008, 01:09:02 PM

Whatley's 302 .... can't copy, sorry!

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=831.0



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Pita on January 07, 2008, 01:13:57 PM
Additional members of the Steering Committee of the Strategic Communications Task Force:

Greg Peterson Aruba Trade & Industry Association
Olindo Koolman Former Governor of Aruba
Alfonso Riverol Aruba Hotel and Tourism Association
Andy Osbourne Aruba Timeshare Association
Jan van Nes Aruba Timeshare Association
Bill Carson Aruba Hotel and Tourism Association
Erik Brete Liaison to the office of the Prime Minister
Henry Baarh Minister Plenipotentiary Washington
John Merryweather Former Government Official
Tamara Waldron Ministry of Tourism and Transportation
Ruben Trappenberg Aruba Airport Authority


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Peaches on January 07, 2008, 01:18:25 PM
Guido and the Wever kids are 2 witnesses who could be held until they talk. Guido is certainly intimately acquainted with Joran being his child hood friend and having been with Joran the next day after her disappearance.

Instead Aruba plays the part of the ignorant chump, what can we do? We know but can't? BS

Hi...PI....do you mean the Santos boys or are there more Wevers than we know about?

Actually, I think he means the Gottenboss boys....Sander and Koen.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: MumInOhio on January 07, 2008, 01:21:44 PM
Guido and the Wever kids are 2 witnesses who could be held until they talk. Guido is certainly intimately acquainted with Joran being his child hood friend and having been with Joran the next day after her disappearance.

Instead Aruba plays the part of the ignorant chump, what can we do? We know but can't? BS

Hi...PI....do you mean the Santos boys or are there more Wevers than we know about?

Actually, I think he means the Gottenboss boys....Sander and Koen.


I thought that after I posted, too, Peaches.

Pita...what do we know about this guy, anything?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: MumInOhio on January 07, 2008, 01:26:26 PM
I wish we could find out who the two instructors/employees were on the boat.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: private eye on January 07, 2008, 01:28:45 PM
Guido and the Wever kids are 2 witnesses who could be held until they talk. Guido is certainly intimately acquainted with Joran being his child hood friend and having been with Joran the next day after her disappearance.

Instead Aruba plays the part of the ignorant chump, what can we do? We know but can't? BS


Then why haven't they done it by now? Would that have not made a better case for the prosecution before Mos went to Aruba?

You have more faith in Mos than I do PI,  :wink:. I just can't buy into anything he has done after the feeble dog and pony show he put on last November/December. Nine months and 5-10 million dollars spent and he goes to Aruba with a few new communication snippets?


I know that I am out on a limb in trusting any authority representing Aruba to be legit, I have no choice as Mos is the only choice I have seen so far who has done anything to shed light on the corruption effectively or to take so action designed to gain evidence.

He did execute a valid strategy to extract information from the boys at great risk to himself and expense. At this point I don't see where it was a bad plan, but I admit it was an iffy plan. And there apparently was some incriminating evidence, whether or not it was enough I don't think we know, except the Judge Wit said it wasn't. Who do we believe, Wit or Mos? When all of the evidence has been gathered and destroyed previously, the confessions of the guilty recanted and the boys further instructed to be silent by paren.

Proof of his effectiveness I took from Wit publicly defending himself and the fact that he searched Cand C patrons for weapons. Proof no but signs of good intention are being seen, but he has a lot more to do if he is for real, granted. Someboy over there has to fix it, and it seems like  we need to provided support to those like Mos until we know otherwise.

I certainly don't know, and as I said, I know it is against popular belief. Maybe I am hoping that I can create a good guy by supporting him. I just hope he doesn't make me a fool:::::::)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: private eye on January 07, 2008, 01:30:08 PM
Guido and the Wever kids are 2 witnesses who could be held until they talk. Guido is certainly intimately acquainted with Joran being his child hood friend and having been with Joran the next day after her disappearance.

Instead Aruba plays the part of the ignorant chump, what can we do? We know but can't? BS

Hi...PI....do you mean the Santos boys or are there more Wevers than we know about?

Actually, I think he means the Gottenboss boys....Sander and Koen.


I thought that after I posted, too, Peaches.

Pita...what do we know about this guy, anything?

Actually all of them:)))))))))))


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Pita on January 07, 2008, 01:30:12 PM
Guido and the Wever kids are 2 witnesses who could be held until they talk. Guido is certainly intimately acquainted with Joran being his child hood friend and having been with Joran the next day after her disappearance.

Instead Aruba plays the part of the ignorant chump, what can we do? We know but can't? BS

Hi...PI....do you mean the Santos boys or are there more Wevers than we know about?

Actually, I think he means the Gottenboss boys....Sander and Koen.


I thought that after I posted, too, Peaches.

Pita...what do we know about this guy, anything?

Not much, just that he was a talking head for the Task Force.  I found an article where he speaks out against the boycott.

snipped....

COSBY:  We‘re going to bring in right now the island‘s chief protocol officer, Eric Brete.  He works closely with the governor‘s prime minister. 

Eric, we‘re going to bring the governor back in, in a second, because we‘re working on some audio issues.  But while we‘re waiting on that, Eric, first of all, what‘s your reaction to now another state joining on board? 

ERIC BRETE, ARUBAN CHIEF PROTOCOL OFFICER:  Good evening.  Well, all that I can say is I do not understand this boycott because of for an isolated incident that happened here on this island.  I dare to say within 100 years that some governors are calling for a boycott. 

I heard the governor say before that it‘s out of respect for the governor of Alabama and the family.  I also have respect for the governor of Alabama and the family.  And I also have a daughter.  My daughter is in school in the United States. 

And I mean, I care for my daughter very much, like I care for everybody else.  And what if something like that, God forbid, happens to her?  Should I boycott the United States?  And I mean, if we can keep going, I mean, like, for instance, you have, like, should we boycott California?  I mean, like...

(CROSSTALK)

COSBY:  Now, Mr. Brete, what‘s your reaction though?  Do you understand why the family is so frustrated and why a lot of people in America are so frustrated?  You know, they feel like, you know, things are, you know, not—people aren‘t pulled in the second time.  Questions aren‘t followed up on.  No leads.  Do you understand their frustration? 

BRETE:  Yes, I do understand their frustration.  But nobody knows what happened to Ms. Holloway.  I mean, nobody knows.  And, I mean, if we could just sit all of us together and start or try to come up with solutions or something for the problem and blame people for something that nobody knows what happened. 

I mean, like, if we‘re going to call a boycott, maybe we should—because I heard the family also say about safety.  She‘s worried about the safety of the people of Aruba.  I mean, should we call a boycott for St.  Thomas?  Two American boys out of New York were killed in St. Thomas. 

Should we call a boycott of St.  Thomas? 

I mean, why where are we going with this?  I mean, I do understand for the family.  I mean, if it was my daughter, I mean, I would do, I mean, all I could do in this world, to be able to find out where she is.  But I cannot go blame innocent people, people that are living on this island that don‘t have anything to do with that.  So a boycott, I think, it‘s out of this world to think of that. 

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10268803/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 07, 2008, 01:30:22 PM

Whatley's 302 .... can't copy, sorry!

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=831.0



The word I should have used was snorkeling, not scuba diving. Sorry.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 07, 2008, 01:33:21 PM

This may go against popular belief, but I think Wit was forced by Mos, for example his press conference to Holland following the release of the boys, to defend his acts in this case. Mos is the only official with the means to expose the corruption involved with this case. He seems to have at been trying so far.

PI ... I will have to respectfully agree to disagree with you on this issue.

As far as I am aware ... it was the office of the prosecutor (Mans Mos) who took sole  responsibility for the decision not to pursue the case against Joran, Deepak and Satish ... claiming that there was insufficient "new"  evidence to bring about a conviction.

It was the same conclusion that Beth Holloway and John Q. Kelly had already arrived at following their meeting with Hans Mos.

Janet

++++++++++++++

Natalee Holloway Case Dismissed
December 18, 2007
By NBC 13 Staff
E-mail


From a press release by the Aruban Public Prosecutor’s Office:

Since the release of all three suspects the Public Prosecutor’s Office has diligently considered and weighed all available evidence. It came to the opinion that the investigation did not bring about sufficient evidence to convince a Court of law that a crime of violence against Natalee Holloway has been committed, nor that her death has been caused by involuntary actions by either of the suspects. Neither was sufficient evidence gathered for sexual abuse.  The Public Prosecutor’s Office expects that if this case would be tried in court it would lead to an acquittal of all three suspects on these various charges. Given that expectation the Public Prosecutor could no longer press charges against all three.  It is contrary to the professional conduct to prosecute someone if the prosecutor himself expects an acquittal.

http://www.nbc13.com/gulfcoastwest/vtm/news.apx.-content-articles-VTM-2007-12-18-0004.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: private eye on January 07, 2008, 01:36:45 PM
If it was Wit, then a complaint should be filed with the Carribean Court that Wit violated the ethics of his position by creating the perception of preferential treatment to a person who worked with him for years in the legal system of Aruba in the execution of the search warrant. The delay and the limiting of search.


CARIBBEAN COURT OF JUSTICE - CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT
http://www.caribbeancourtofjustice.org/codeofethics.html

I.  PROPRIETY

1.3 A judge shall avoid close personal association with individual members of the legal profession, particularly those who practice in the judge’s court, where such association might reasonably give rise to the suspicion or appearance of favouritism or partiality.

1.4 A judge shall avoid the use of the judge’s residence by a member of the legal profession to receive clients or other members of the legal profession in circumstances that might reasonably give rise to the suspicion or appearance of impropriety on the part of the judge.

1.9 A judge shall not allow the judge’s family, social or other relationships improperly to influence the judge’s judicial conduct and judgment as a judge.

1.10 A judge shall not use or lend the prestige of the judicial office to advance the private interests of the judge, a member of the judge’s family or of anyone else, nor shall a judge permit others to convey the impression that anyone is in a special position improperly to influence the judge in the performance of judicial duties.

Maybe we should send a copy to Wit for his own future use??????????:)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: private eye on January 07, 2008, 01:40:47 PM

This may go against popular belief, but I think Wit was forced by Mos, for example his press conference to Holland following the release of the boys, to defend his acts in this case. Mos is the only official with the means to expose the corruption involved with this case. He seems to have at been trying so far.

PI ... I will have to respectfully agree to disagree with you on this issue.

As far as I am aware ... it was the office of the prosecutor (Mans Mos) who took sole  responsibility for the decision not to pursue the case against Joran, Deepak and Satish ... claiming that there was insufficient "new"  evidence to bring about a conviction.

It was the same conclusion that Beth Holloway and John Q. Kelly had already arrived at following their meeting with Hans Mos.

Janet

++++++++++++++

Natalee Holloway Case Dismissed
December 18, 2007
By NBC 13 Staff
E-mail


From a press release by the Aruban Public Prosecutor’s Office:

Since the release of all three suspects the Public Prosecutor’s Office has diligently considered and weighed all available evidence. It came to the opinion that the investigation did not bring about sufficient evidence to convince a Court of law that a crime of violence against Natalee Holloway has been committed, nor that her death has been caused by involuntary actions by either of the suspects. Neither was sufficient evidence gathered for sexual abuse.  The Public Prosecutor’s Office expects that if this case would be tried in court it would lead to an acquittal of all three suspects on these various charges. Given that expectation the Public Prosecutor could no longer press charges against all three.  It is contrary to the professional conduct to prosecute someone if the prosecutor himself expects an acquittal.

http://www.nbc13.com/gulfcoastwest/vtm/news.apx.-content-articles-VTM-2007-12-18-0004.html


I don't know that we disagree except that i am withholding judgment on Mos for the time being. History supports the theory that he will be crooked. But there are slivers of activity that indicate he is not. I don't want to not support someone who may be trying to help and then make the criticism become truth if that makes sense:)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Pita on January 07, 2008, 01:41:23 PM
(http://i103.photobucket.com/albums/m153/CMPM/ericbrete.jpg)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CWGmUwfjIQ4


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 07, 2008, 01:42:30 PM
John Q. Kelly
On the Record w/ Greta
December 4, 2007


JOHN Q. KELLY, HOLLOWAY ATTORNEY: Disappointing, Greta. I think it was disappointing to me and actually extraordinarily painful and almost cruel for Beth and Dave after being down there.

They'd like to get some answers and they'd like to see some progress made. And it's not fair to bring them down there with the false promises, with raised expectations, sort of a dog and pony show down there with no substance.

And it was — it just really took whatever spirit, almost, that Beth and Dave had left, went through that this weekend. It was really — it was terribly painful, for lack of a better expression.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,314966,00.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: MumInOhio on January 07, 2008, 01:50:06 PM

Whatley's 302 .... can't copy, sorry!

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=831.0



The word I should have used was snorkeling, not scuba diving. Sorry.

Did GVC work on one of these boats? I recall he didn't last long on the Visibility team. I thought I only found a couple of the companies last time I looked. (Lala's, I can't get scuba diving and snorkeling straight,I know the difference LOL, but if you ask me which one Natalee did, I don't have a clue!)

Thanks Pita...He is an elder guy. I wonder what that btn+g means that someone searched?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: sandy leiva on January 07, 2008, 01:55:06 PM
hiya monkeys,klass and everyine else new and old.Im still following this case with you all but havent been online much,i moved to my new home and dont have internet setup yet.  hopefully next week.  i check in at work when i can. any new updates lately?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: sirensong on January 07, 2008, 02:04:05 PM
Could this be the elusive A.B. that was interviewed by the police?  First they said  E.B., right? 

I am not sure, but I think it was  DePalma tours, the snorkeling  trip? 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Dayhiker on January 07, 2008, 02:12:26 PM


BRETE:  Yes, I do understand their frustration.  But nobody knows what happened to Ms. Holloway.  I mean, nobody knows.  And, I mean, if we could just sit all of us together and start or try to come up with solutions or something for the problem and blame people for something that nobody knows what happened. 



Nobody knows what happened to Ms. Holloway? Nobody? Let's start with a laundry list of suspects as long as your arm and add cops, government officials, ATA & AHATA, judges, prosecutors, and the Mafia.

Better answer for Brete might be "Nobody knows know why Ms. Holloway's killers haven't been brought to justice yet." That I will believe.

Nice find, Pita!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Dayhiker on January 07, 2008, 02:18:26 PM

CARIBBEAN COURT OF JUSTICE - CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT
http://www.caribbeancourtofjustice.org/codeofethics.html

I.  PROPRIETY

1.3 A judge shall avoid close personal association with individual members of the legal profession, particularly those who practice in the judge’s court, where such association might reasonably give rise to the suspicion or appearance of favouritism or partiality.

1.4 A judge shall avoid the use of the judge’s residence by a member of the legal profession to receive clients or other members of the legal profession in circumstances that might reasonably give rise to the suspicion or appearance of impropriety on the part of the judge.

1.9 A judge shall not allow the judge’s family, social or other relationships improperly to influence the judge’s judicial conduct and judgment as a judge.

1.10 A judge shall not use or lend the prestige of the judicial office to advance the private interests of the judge, a member of the judge’s family or of anyone else, nor shall a judge permit others to convey the impression that anyone is in a special position improperly to influence the judge in the performance of judicial duties.

Maybe we should send a copy to Wit for his own future use??????????:)


Am shocked they have a Code of Conduct. They damn sure don't adhere to it. All bets are off when you let the Dutchies handle the judiciating. 18 months for human trafficking charges? Harkens back to the days of Dutch colonialism and slavery.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: private eye on January 07, 2008, 02:26:14 PM
John Q. Kelly
On the Record w/ Greta
December 4, 2007


JOHN Q. KELLY, HOLLOWAY ATTORNEY: Disappointing, Greta. I think it was disappointing to me and actually extraordinarily painful and almost cruel for Beth and Dave after being down there.

They'd like to get some answers and they'd like to see some progress made. And it's not fair to bring them down there with the false promises, with raised expectations, sort of a dog and pony show down there with no substance.

And it was — it just really took whatever spirit, almost, that Beth and Dave had left, went through that this weekend. It was really — it was terribly painful, for lack of a better expression.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,314966,00.html


I realize that the failure of the plan was hard on Beth, and I assume Dave, and everyone for that matter, but Beth can take the pain of failure of well thought out plans. I assume she wants them to take some risks, which this plan obviously had, as long as they are trying. I don't want to criticize someone for trying and want to encourage the good guys over there, if there are any, to not be afraid to do anything for risk of failure.

However, I won't be surprised if I am disappointed:))))))


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 07, 2008, 02:31:35 PM

This may go against popular belief, but I think Wit was forced by Mos, for example his press conference to Holland following the release of the boys, to defend his acts in this case. Mos is the only official with the means to expose the corruption involved with this case. He seems to have at been trying so far.

PI ... I will have to respectfully agree to disagree with you on this issue.

As far as I am aware ... it was the office of the prosecutor (Mans Mos) who took sole  responsibility for the decision not to pursue the case against Joran, Deepak and Satish ... claiming that there was insufficient "new"  evidence to bring about a conviction.

It was the same conclusion that Beth Holloway and John Q. Kelly had already arrived at following their meeting with Hans Mos.

Janet

++++++++++++++

Natalee Holloway Case Dismissed
December 18, 2007
By NBC 13 Staff
E-mail


From a press release by the Aruban Public Prosecutor’s Office:

Since the release of all three suspects the Public Prosecutor’s Office has diligently considered and weighed all available evidence. It came to the opinion that the investigation did not bring about sufficient evidence to convince a Court of law that a crime of violence against Natalee Holloway has been committed, nor that her death has been caused by involuntary actions by either of the suspects. Neither was sufficient evidence gathered for sexual abuse.  The Public Prosecutor’s Office expects that if this case would be tried in court it would lead to an acquittal of all three suspects on these various charges. Given that expectation the Public Prosecutor could no longer press charges against all three.  It is contrary to the professional conduct to prosecute someone if the prosecutor himself expects an acquittal.

http://www.nbc13.com/gulfcoastwest/vtm/news.apx.-content-articles-VTM-2007-12-18-0004.html


I don't know that we disagree except that i am withholding judgment on Mos for the time being. History supports the theory that he will be crooked. But there are slivers of activity that indicate he is not. I don't want to not support someone who may be trying to help and then make the criticism become truth if that makes sense:)

PI ... considering what Hans Mos has put the parents of Natalee through in the past month ... I am not about to give this guy the benefit of the doubt at this point.

If Hans Mos has a master plan ... he certainly has a cruel way of going about it.  In November, 2007 ... Dave and Beth climbed aboard that emotional roller coaster once again ... hoping against all hope that maybe ... just maybe ... Aruba was going to come through ... hoping that justice for Natalee was finally going to prevail.  Less than one month later ...

PI ... we both have differing perspectives regarding this topic and ... that is OK. I will gladly eat crow if I am wrong.  :lol:

Janet

++++++++++++++++

Hans Mos
ABC NEWS
November 26, 2007


Hans Mos, Aruba's chief prosecutor, told ABC News he believes the the new evidence makes the case against the three men stronger than it was two years.

"We are convinced if we had had this evidence we have now they would not have been released by the court at that time," Mos said.
http://sendtofriend.abcnews.go.com/GMA/story?id=3912737


Hans Mos
On the Record with Greta
November 27, 2007


GRETA VAN SUSTEREN, HOST: Breaking news from Aruba, Joran van der Sloot ordered to stay behind bars for at least eight more days. Now, the Kalpoe brothers already got the same news last week. Now, all three suspects were re-arrested. Why? The prosecutor has now charged all three with voluntary manslaughter of Natalee Holloway.

MOS: And this decision to re-arrest these three suspects was a decision taken by 10 lawyers, by 10 lawyers sitting around a table (INAUDIBLE) whole afternoon, being presented the new material.http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,313168,00.html


John Q. Kelly
On the Record w/ Greta
December 4, 2007


KELLY: Well, in their press release and even in conversations. I had a long discussion with him Thanksgiving morning after the arrests, and you know, he indicated that they were very confident, this new evidence they had, this incriminating evidence. And it turns out, quite frankly, that it is nothing new ...  

VAN SUSTEREN: All right. So you can say with 100 percent certainly there's nothing new, right?

KELLY: I can say it with 99 percent.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,314966,00.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 07, 2008, 02:33:35 PM
Left to fill void of the missing;
High-profile cases leave lasting mark on communities
 


The small pile of stuffed animals, soaking wet and leaning against a gazebo, was the most visible trace of the frenzied activity that thrust Plainfield into the headlines nine months ago.

The gazebo, less than half a block from the home of Lisa Stebic, was where investigators convened, throngs of reporters and satellite trucks descended and prayers were offered for the missing mother of two. Now, there's still a tattered "Lisa we miss you" sign and a few candles strewn about. But except for the honking geese overhead, the street was eerily quiet.

The news media compound migrated 8 miles to the north to Bolingbrook, where it's all Peterson, all the time. Whether about Stacy, who disappeared in October, or her husband, Drew, a former cop who is a suspect in the case. But in ways large and small, life in the quiet Plainfield subdivision is forever changed.

High-decibel investigations can touch off waves of repercussions. Careers are made and broken, parks are created, relationships unravel and scholarships send students to college who may not otherwise have had the opportunity.

In Modesto, Calif., the back-to-back disappearances of Chandra Levy and Laci Peterson put the city on the media map.

"Before all that happened, the only thing we were known for was the Gallo winery," said Patty Burnett, a legal secretary. Burnett's mother lived near Laci Peterson, who vanished in 2002 and captivated America for the next two years -- until her husband, Scott, was found guilty of murdering his wife and unborn baby. "When you said you were from Modesto, for a long time, people would just roll their eyes."

A notorious missing-person case leaves an indelible mark on a neighborhood, a city -- even an island, as in the saga of Natalee Holloway, the Alabama high school student who vanished in 2005 during a class trip to Aruba. Instead of a glistening turquoise sea and pristine white beaches, the Caribbean entity with ties to the Netherlands was portrayed as dark and sinister. Alabama's governor urged a travel boycott, protesting what he called an inadequate investigation. The damage was done, and tourism -- 75 percent of the local economy -- was hit hard. Business rebounded in 2007, with visitors up almost 8 percent over the previous year, said the Aruba Tourism Authority.

http://www6.lexisnexis.com/publisher/EndUser?Action=UserDisplayFullDocument&orgId=574&topicId=100020825&docId=l:724991535&start=5


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: MumInOhio on January 07, 2008, 02:37:49 PM
Could this be the elusive A.B. that was interviewed by the police?  First they said  E.B., right? 

I am not sure, but I think it was  DePalma tours, the snorkeling  trip? 



Thanks...Sirensong...will have a look some more tomorrow. I have a list of student quotes, but don't recall seeing it there and about the links don't work anymore.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Sam on January 07, 2008, 02:44:56 PM
I wish we could find out who the two instructors/employees were on the boat.

Klaas where are you

Mum we do have that info somewhere. Klaas maybe able to find it in her archives. I know the captain goes by the name of Jethro. If I remember Klaas has the real name of him. She also knows the name of the boat. I have always found it odd that the boat left Aruba for somewhere in the Netherlands for a vacation that was planned the day after Natalee disappeared. Meaning Monday morning.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Dayhiker on January 07, 2008, 02:47:00 PM

PI ... considering what Hans Mos has put the parents of Natalee through in the past month ... I am not about to give this guy the benefit of the doubt at this point.

If Hans Mos has a master plan ... he certainly has a cruel way of going about it.  In November, 2007 ... Dave and Beth climbed aboard that emotional roller coaster once again ... hoping against all hope that maybe ... just maybe ... Aruba was going to come through ... hoping that justice for Natalee was finally going to prevail.  Less than one month later ...

PI ... we both have differing perspectives regarding this topic and ... that is OK. I will gladly eat crow if I am wrong.  :lol:

Janet


Yep yep yep. Remember how we gave Prosecutor Karin Janssen a free ticket for almost two years until we started finding out the real dirt on her. All she was doing was stalling for time, then she flees the country to safety in Holland like all guilty parties do.

Hans Mos is deja vu all over again.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Sam on January 07, 2008, 02:49:52 PM
I wish we could find out who the two instructors/employees were on the boat.

Klaas where are you

Mum we do have that info somewhere. Klaas maybe able to find it in her archives. I know the captain goes by the name of Jethro. If I remember Klaas has the real name of him. She also knows the name of the boat. I have always found it odd that the boat left Aruba for somewhere in the Netherlands for a vacation that was planned the day after Natalee disappeared. Meaning Monday morning.

I should have said odd coincidence.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 07, 2008, 02:55:35 PM
I wish we could find out who the two instructors/employees were on the boat.

Klaas where are you

Mum we do have that info somewhere. Klaas maybe able to find it in her archives. I know the captain goes by the name of Jethro. If I remember Klaas has the real name of him. She also knows the name of the boat. I have always found it odd that the boat left Aruba for somewhere in the Netherlands for a vacation that was planned the day after Natalee disappeared. Meaning Monday morning.

I should have said odd coincidence.

Did a quick search...is this part of what you are talking about?

********
klaasend
Administrator
Monkey All Star

 Online

Posts: 30296



   Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
« Reply #278 on: September 10, 2006, 10:38:21 PM » 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote from: "Sam"
I guess I am on ignore. I have asked the same sort of question for the last few days. It turns out I was wrong on the name of the boat. It was not Calypso. It was Octopus.

This supposedly was the one that Natalee and her friends went snorkeling/ scuba on. Klaas is going to shoot me because I do not know how to do the tiny urls. I think this one should be small enough to not blow the margins. This is the boat Florida mentioned leaving Aruba the day after Natalee disappeared. Monday am. It was said it was a planned vacation.

When I saw this website before I thought it had a picture of Captain Jethro where you could see his eyes and they were blue. This picture he has on sunglasses.

According to this site there are no Sunday cruises listed. From my memory it was supposed to have been a cruise they were on before going to the Excelsior.

Just idle speculation on my part but I have often wondered if the cab drivers story was true and Nat said she was in love with a blue eyed Dutch boy if she could have been kidding about Jethro. Much to old for her but cute. Ok heres the site.

http://www.octopusaruba.com/index.html

Not ignoring you I just don't believe the story. So what happened?  Natalee ran away with Jethro?  Jethro found Natalee on the beach and killed her?  Jethro found Natalee on the beach and sold her as a sex slave?  Seems very unlikely.  Why would Natalee be targeted in such a way?
 
 



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 07, 2008, 03:01:20 PM
I wish we could find out who the two instructors/employees were on the boat.

Klaas where are you

Mum we do have that info somewhere. Klaas maybe able to find it in her archives. I know the captain goes by the name of Jethro. If I remember Klaas has the real name of him. She also knows the name of the boat. I have always found it odd that the boat left Aruba for somewhere in the Netherlands for a vacation that was planned the day after Natalee disappeared. Meaning Monday morning.

Been working and just got back from a dentist appointment.  Off the top of my head the name of the boat was the Octopus....BUT...I'm not sure it's confirmed that is the boat the MB kids went on.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: yapperz1 on January 07, 2008, 03:04:28 PM
The Octopus is owned by Capt Jethro Gesterkamp who happens to be none other than scubajap's ex.

http://www.octopusaruba.com/

Oh Hiya Monkeys


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: private eye on January 07, 2008, 03:14:44 PM
 http://wwwserver.law.wits.ac.za/humanrts/cat/netherlands1998.html
University of Minnesota Human Rights

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Committee Against Torture, Consideration of reports submitted by States Parties under article 19 of the Convention, Netherlands - Antilles and Aruba - (1998).




Part Two

Aruba

I. PENAL AND PENITENTIARY SYSTEM

A. General

63. While Aruba's young and advanced constitutional system contains the main legal safeguards required by the human rights conventions, other legislation gives shape to the criminal law, the law of criminal procedure and the law governing the execution of custodial sentences. Aruban criminal and detention law thus meet the requirements of the human rights conventions. However, as this legislation is rather dated in a number of respects, it has not always fulfilled the requirements imposed by Aruba itself in its Constitution. In recent years, concentrated efforts have therefore been made to rapidly modernize this legislation where necessary, particularly in the area of criminal procedure and detention law. This has resulted in modern legislation based on the human rights conventions and also in legislative projects that are on the point of completion.



B. The Constitution of Aruba

64. When Aruba obtained its separate constitutional status in 1986, it seized the opportunity to introduce a constitution of its own - the Constitution of Aruba, based on the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the European Social Charter, the Constitution of the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the Constitution of the Netherlands Antilles. Aruba's Constitution lays down the fundamental rights of persons subject to the law of Aruba. The guiding principle in this respect is the notion that citizens should be afforded protection against and support by the authorities. What is of essential importance to the Convention is above all the right of inviolability of the person laid down in article I.3 of the Constitution. As a result, acts which in any way constitute an infringement of the physical integrity of a person are prohibited in the Constitution. Exceptions to this right are permitted only if and insofar as they are provided for by law. This is implemented, for example, by Aruba's new Code of Criminal Procedure (AB 1996 No. 75).


65. A number of the European Convention's provisions also appear almost literally in the Constitution. Examples are the principle of equality, the principle of legality, the presumption of innocence and the ban on imposing the death penalty. Article I.5 of the Constitution also contains detailed provisions governing the lawfulness of arrest, detention and imprisonment. This article, which is closely modelled on article 5 of the European Convention and the case law resulting from it, covers all cases of deprivation of liberty (art. I.7). Finally, the Constitution includes a provision on legal assistance (art. I.7) and provisions governing due process and the independence of the judiciary (chap. VI).




C. Criminal law

66. The principle of legality applies under both the criminal law and the law of criminal procedure. Under article 1, paragraph 1, of the Criminal Code of Aruba (AB 1991, No. GT 50), no offence is punishable unless it was an offence under a provision of the criminal law existing at the time it was committed (see also article I.6 of the Constitution). Under article 9 of the new Code of Criminal Procedure of Aruba which took effect on 1 October 1997, prosecutions are brought only in the cases and in the manner provided for by country ordinance (i.e. a formal statute of the Aruban legislature). This means that the substantive and procedural criminal law of Aruba always accords primacy to the principle of legal certainty. An individual may not be punished for acts that are not defined as criminal by law; every act taken by the authorities under criminal procedure should also be justified to the individual. In this way all forms of arbitrary action against the individual are in principle made impossible.


67. The Criminal Code of Aruba was inadequate in two ways in terms of the legal rights protected by the European Convention. As mentioned in the previous report, there were first of all several outdated regulations governing the execution of custodial sentences that were no longer applied in practice. For example, article 14 of the Code provides that the courts can order that a person sentenced to a term of imprisonment of more than five years should be shackled when working. Outdated regulations of this kind, which are no longer in keeping with modern views on the treatment of prisoners and the nature of custodial sentences, will be repealed when the new law on imprisonment is introduced. The new bill governing the execution of custodial sentences is presently being considered by the Advisory Council and will in due course be submitted to the Aruban parliament. If this becomes law, the Criminal Code of Aruba will cease to contain any provisions governing the execution of custodial sentences. The existence of such provisions is no longer in keeping with the idea that imprisonment should be geared to the rehabilitation of convicted prisoners (see also sect. E).


68. Second, the Aruban Criminal Code provides only indirectly that torture and other forms of inhuman or degrading treatment are punishable offences (this too was mentioned in the previous report). Although there are extensive provisions for punishing assault (arts. 313-318) and extra sentences are available for imposition on public officials convicted of assault (art. 46), torture as such is not a criminal offence under the Code. This is why the implementing legislation referred to in the previous report has now been redrafted. As a result, a bill to implement the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment is now being publicly debated in the Aruban parliament. This legislation will shortly introduce the specific offence of "assault committed by a person in the course of his duties in the service of a government body against another person either with a view to obtaining information or a confession from the latter or to punishing him, intimidating him or another person or compelling him or another person to do or allow something, or out of contempt for that person's claims to human dignity". This offence carries a term of imprisonment not exceeding 15 years, or 20 years (life) if the offence results in death (see also the notes on articles 2-4 of the Convention against Torture). It is expected that the bill will become law on or around the date when this report is considered.



D. Criminal procedure

69. The constraints that can be used against a defendant in the course of criminal proceedings and how this can be done are exhaustively regulated in Aruba's Code of Criminal Procedure, to which reference has already been made. The entry into effect of this new Code was a milestone in the history of Aruba's criminal law system. The rights of suspects have been greatly improved in the new Code. Very importantly, provision is now made in many places in the law for the assignment of defence counsel. If necessary, the assistance of counsel may be free under a legal aid order. Whenever a suspect is deprived of his liberty, he is entitled to the immediate assistance of defence counsel. Indeed, counsel may be consulted even before the first interview by the police. This means that from the moment of the initial contact with the criminal justice authorities a suspect can be assisted by a lawyer, who can monitor the lawfulness of the treatment accorded to the suspect in the course of the criminal proceedings and can apply to the court in the event of any irregularities. This provides a strong safeguard against arbitrary and unlawful action by the authorities.


70. The new Code also provides other fundamental safeguards against unlawful action by the authorities. First of all, the application of constraints against a suspect is made the subject of precise rules. Before a constraint is employed, it will have to be clear in each case whether certain minimum conditions for the application of the measure have been fulfilled. If the police or public prosecutions service fail to fulfil these conditions, they will be sanctioned by the courts for applying the relevant constraint. In addition, article 71 of the Code provides that constraints used against a suspect (i.e. the pre-trial constraints under criminal law, including physical constraints) must not be unreasonable in the light of the different interests involved in the case and may also be used only for the purpose for which they are ultimately intended. Furthermore, it must not be possible to achieve the object of the constraint in some other less radical way. Lastly, there must be reasonable grounds for believing that the seriousness of the infringement caused by the constraint is justified by the seriousness of the offence. These general principles of due process, which were originally derived from unwritten law, are intended to help ensure that application of a custodial measure cannot degenerate into an independent punitive process.


71. Finally, articles 178 to 181 of the Code create an explicit procedure for individuals to claim compensation for the unlawful application of pre-trial constraints. If constraints are judged to be out of proportion to their lawful object they are held in law to have been an unlawful act by the authorities.


72. In summary, Aruba's system of criminal procedure is based on the principle that the legitimacy of each government act should be demonstrated to the individual concerned. If constraints are used, their application must be in accordance with various rules that can help to minimize abuse of power.



E. Detention

73. Detention is possible in Aruba only in circumstances where it has been regulated by law. Detention infringes the fundamental rights of personal liberty and safety guaranteed in the Constitution and the right to move around, reside and choose a place of residence freely in Aruba. It also follows from the Constitution that where a person is deprived of his liberty the procedural rules given by or with the authorization of parliament should be observed. The power to deprive a person of his liberty must therefore be laid down by law. Deprivation of liberty may occur only in the cases listed exhaustively in article I.5 of the Constitution. These are successively:


Lawful detention after conviction by a competent court;
Lawful arrest or detention for non-compliance with the lawful order of a court or in order to secure the fulfilment of any obligation prescribed by law;
Lawful arrest or detention of a person effected for the purpose of bringing him before the competent legal authority on reasonable suspicion of having committed an offence or when it is reasonably considered necessary to prevent his committing an offence, fleeing after having done so or prejudicing a criminal investigation;
Lawful detention of a minor for the purpose of educational supervision or his lawful detention for the purpose of bringing him before the competent legal authority;
Lawful detention of persons to prevent the spreading of infectious diseases and of persons of unsound mind, alcoholics and drug addicts;
Lawful detention of persons to prevent them entering the country illegally and of persons against whom an action is being taken with a view to deportation or extradition.
74. Once a person has been detained, the detention should be served in accordance with the principles of the rule of law. The current regulations do not provide an adequate framework for this as they date from a time when the need for offenders to be rehabilitated and for prisoners to have legal rights enforceable against the authorities had not yet been recognized. At present the regulations comprise the Prisons Act (PB 1930, No. 73) (based on article 26 of the Criminal Code of Aruba), the Prisons Order (PB 1958, No. 18) and the Prison Staff Instructions (PB 1958 No. 19). Together with Titles II and III of Book 1 of the Criminal Code of Aruba, these regulations constitute the law governing the implementation of remands in custody, custodial sentences and other forms of detention. Like Aruba's Criminal Code, the Prisons Order and the Prison Staff Instructions contain no explicit ban on torture and merely contain an instruction "to treat prisoners considerately, without fraternizing with them" (article 13 of the Prison Staff Instructions).


75. In view of the desire to modernize detention law in its entirety and strengthen the position of prisoners, a bill to regulate the execution of custodial sentences was drafted. This bill was announced during the fourteenth session of the Committee against Torture in 1995. However, the bill in its original form has been subjected to a thorough review on the recommendation of the Advisory Council of Aruba, which has led to some delay. The bill has now reached the stage where it can be presented to Aruba's parliament in the near future. The bill does not contain an explicit ban on torture. Nor would such a ban be logical since the whole purpose of the bill from the point of view of the rule of law is to emphasize the rights of prisoners and to prohibit outright any action that would limit or undermine these rights (including fundamental rights) still further. In view of this express recognition of prisoners as independent persons having rights and duties under the law, it follows that it is unnecessary to formulate a ban on torture within the prison system. Here too, however, torture is of course a criminal offence under the general provision on torture in the bill to implement the Convention against Torture.


76. All the permitted infringements of the fundamental rights of prisoners have been explicitly defined and the conditions on which the infringements are possible have been listed exhaustively. If these rights are nonetheless infringed unlawfully, for example as a result of the way in which the detention is implemented, prisoners have a lawful right to complain about this to an independent board of visitors which is responsible for checking that custodial sentences are executed lawfully. A prisoner may be assisted by counsel in a complaint procedure. The rulings of the board of visitors on a prisoner's complaint are binding on the authorities responsible for implementing the detention.


77. The bill defines precisely what infringements of the physical integrity of prisoners are permitted and on what conditions. Any search of prisoners to discover whether they have prohibited objects in their possession may not go beyond an external search of their body and clothing. Prisoners may be required to undergo medical treatment only if they have - or are thought to have - a sickness that poses a serious threat to their health or the health of other prisoners. Finally, physical coercion - including the use of force - is permissible only if and insofar as this is absolutely necessary in order to maintain order or security in the prison, carry out decisions of the authorities in relation to the sentence or prevent the prisoner from escaping. It is explicitly provided in this connection that physical coercion may never be used if the consequences (for the prisoner) would be out of proportion to the object served by the coercion. It is also provided that when coercion has to be used the authorities should choose the form that will achieve the desired effect with the minimum of harm. In addition, a doctor should always be called in to examine a prisoner within 24 hours when force is used. Prisoners may complain about the use of force to the board of visitors mentioned above.



II. INFORMATION RELATING TO ARTICLES OF THE CONVENTION

Article 2

Paragraph 1


78. The measures to prevent the possibility of torture in Aruba take two forms. First of all, the possibility of torture is precluded by law in Aruba. The right of every individual to inviolability of the person is enshrined in article I.3 of the Constitution of Aruba (AB 1987 No. GT 1). Under this article, the fundamental right of inviolability of the person may be limited only by or pursuant to country ordinance, in other words by Aruban legislation. The provision has therefore been elaborated in various items of legislation. The most important of them are the Criminal Code of Aruba (AB 1991, No. GT 50) and the bill to implement the Convention against Torture, which is expected to be passed by the Aruban parliament and become law in the near future. Under this bill, torture will be an offence not in the Criminal Code but in a special ordinance. The definition of the offence of torture has been closely modelled on article 1 (1) of the Convention, and the offence carries very heavy custodial sentences (varying from 15 years' imprisonment to life). For a detailed description of the content of the Code and the bill, reference should be made to the notes on article 4 of the Convention below.


79. Second, the possibility of torture is avoided by a system of preventive supervision and regular checks on the treatment of prisoners. The supervision and checks are presently arranged in three ways. First of all, the Aruban Correctional Institute has a board of visitors. This board has been instituted on the basis of the Board of Visitors (Prisons and Remand Centres) Order (AB 1995 No. GT 25) and is charged - in essence - with supervising the way in which custodial sentences and non-punitive orders are executed. Under article 4, opening words and (a), of the Order referred to above, the board is responsible in particular for "supervision of all matters relating to the institution, especially the treatment of prisoners and the observance of the regulations". For this purpose, the members of the board are entitled to gain access at all times to all parts of an institution and to all places where prisoners are kept (art. 5 (1)). Under article 6 of the Order the board is empowered to ascertain the wishes and feelings of the prisoners by personal contact with them and the prisoners can communicate with the board free of censorship. In this way, irregularities in the treatment of prisoners can be made public. The board is required to report before 1 March of each year to the minister responsible for the prison system on its work in the past year.


80. The board of visitors will also acquire a judicial role when the bill governing the execution of custodial sentences becomes law. Under this bill the rights and duties of prisoners are defined in detail. Prisoners will be entitled to complain to the board of visitors about limitations on the rights to which they are entitled and about violations of their rights. The board acts in this respect as a complaints court that is independent of the criminal justice authorities and gives judgements binding on the prison administration. The chairman of the board of visitors is a member of the Aruban judiciary.


81. The second guarantee of the supervision and checks to ensure the proper treatment of prisoners is provided by the new Aruban Code of Criminal Procedure. This Code first of all implements article I.5, paragraph 3 (a), of the Constitution, under which a prisoner may apply to the courts for a quick decision on the lawfulness or otherwise of his detention. Under the Code a suspect has the right to be brought before a judge within three days of his arrest (art. 89, para. 1). This right applies while the suspect is still in police custody. Even afterwards, however, the lawfulness of the detention is checked at regular intervals (during remand in custody). Although the purpose of the courts' involvement is primarily to ensure that the conditions for the application of detention have been fulfilled, the Code does not prevent the subject of practices contrary to the Convention being raised during the hearing. There is therefore judicial supervision of detention both in police cells and in a remand centre.


82. A provision that is of exceptional importance in relation to the treatment of prisoners, particularly those in police custody, is article 90 of the Aruban Code of Criminal Procedure. This article defines the measures, including coercion, that can be taken against a prisoner during pre-trial detention. The constraints that can be employed against a prisoner under this article and that involve an infringement of the fundamental right of inviolability of the person may be ordered only by the public prosecutor, who must first obtain the authorization of the examining magistrate (a member of the judiciary). A special form of redress for such an infringement exists under the above-mentioned article 90, paragraph 7, in the form of an action to the Joint Court of Justice of the Netherlands Antilles and Aruba.


83. Lastly, the Code of Criminal Procedure gives prisoners the right to be assisted by counsel. Counsel may be involved at a very early stage - even before the start of the first police interviews - and is always assigned free of charge during police custody. This means that the way in which prisoners are treated is always monitored at first hand by a lawyer representing the prisoner, who can intervene immediately if his client is treated in a manner contrary to the Convention.


84. The statutory system also provides various ways in which prisoners can, in appropriate cases, obtain compensation through the courts for unlawful treatment or seek an injunction to restrain any future acts constituting unlawful treatment. These claims can be based on the Aruban Code of Criminal Procedure or instituted as a purely civil action. In addition, where there has been an unlawful and serious infringement of the fundamental rights of a person in pre-trial detention, the case law shows that the courts may in practice rule that the demand by the public prosecutor for a custodial sentence or constraint is not admissible and immediately release the prisoner.


Paragraph 2


85. Aruba's legal system contains a number of special items of legislation that cover emergencies of the kind referred to in article 2, paragraph 2, of the Convention. However, the basic requirement that action by the authorities should be lawful and in accordance with the rule of law continues to apply in full in this legislation.


Paragraph 3


86. Paragraph 3 of article 2 of the Convention stipulates that an order from a superior officer or public authority may not be invoked as a justification of torture. Articles 44 and 45 of Aruba's Code of Criminal Procedure contain specific provisions governing observance of statutory regulations and orders given by a superior. Under these articles a person who commits a criminal offence in the course of implementing a statutory regulation or obeying orders given by a competent authority is not punishable. However, a public servant invoking this defence must show that the relevant order was given by the competent authority or that he obeyed the order believing in good faith that it had been given by the competent authority.


87. In order to rule out any possibility that an order by a superior may be invoked as a defence to a charge of torture, the bill to implement the Convention against Torture explicitly provides that such a defence is excluded (article 3 of the bill). This means that there can be no discussion whatever about the question of whether a public servant may avoid conviction for torture by invoking the defence of an order given by his superior. Article 3 of the bill also explicitly excludes the possibility that a public servant can raise the defence that he was implementing a statutory regulation.



Article 3

88. Aruba's immigration policy involves the restrictive application of the scope provided by the Admission and Expulsion Ordinance (AB 1993 No. GT 33). A major consideration is the small size of the country: it would not be feasible to allow people to enter Aruba without restriction in order to settle and work there. This would make excessive demands on the available infrastructure and lead to undesirable situations. In view of this limited capacity to absorb foreigners, aliens can be admitted only if this would be in the real interests of Aruba or if there are pressing reasons of a humanitarian nature.


89. In order to stay in Aruba, an alien must have a valid residence permit. Anyone found in Aruba without a valid residence permit may be removed by the Minister of Justice under article 19 of the Admission and Expulsion Ordinance or by the Procurator-General under article 15. Appeal lies against a decision of the Minister of Justice pursuant to the Administrative Decisions Appeals Ordinance (AB 1993 No. 45).


90. In accordance with article 2 of the Charter of the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the Admission and Expulsion Ordinance, requests for asylum in Aruba that are made in Aruba are dealt with by the Aruban authorities. Requests for asylum in the Netherlands that are made in Aruba are dealt with by the Netherlands mission. The 1967 Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees took effect in Aruba on 1 January 1986. The term "refugee" is limited in both the 1951 Geneva Convention and the Protocol to persons who have a well-founded fear of persecution. The right of the State to decide who should be treated as a refugee is preserved. If someone is treated as a refugee the parties to the Protocol may not expel or return such a person. Since Aruba has no statutory procedure for dealing with asylum requests, each request has to be dealt with on an ad hoc basis. This is because there have hitherto been scarcely any requests for political asylum. Although there are therefore no official procedures, the authorities concerned work together as closely as possible in order to determine whether there is a well-founded fear of persecution (this fear must be supported by facts) and, if there is, to provide adequate protection for the person concerned. Consultation also takes place with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in The Hague, the missions of the Kingdom abroad and the relevant international organizations. The final decision on a request for asylum is taken by the Minister of Justice.



Article 4

91. Criminal liability for torture is regulated in the bill to implement the Convention against Torture. Other forms of physical violence are offences under Aruba's Criminal Code.


92. The perpetrator should in principle be a government official or other person acting in an official capacity. This action may consist of physical acts, attempts to commit such acts or procuring, permitting or tolerating such acts. As the forms of assault that qualify as torture constitute aggravated forms of assault, attempts too are offences.


93. Articles 313-318 of the Criminal Code of Aruba provide that the offence of assault and the aggravated forms of assault carry penalties. The sentences for the commission of such offences are included in these articles: the maximum sentences range from 2 years' imprisonment for assault (art. 313, para. 1) to 15 years' imprisonment for serious assault committed with premeditation (art. 316, para. 2). The sentences may be increased by a third for officials who commit the offence in the course of their duties (art. 46), where such officials breach a special legal duty or, in committing the offence, abuse a power, opportunity or means given to them by virtue of their office. The maximum sentence for serious assault committed by an official in the course of his duties is therefore 16 years (art. 316, para. 1, in conjunction with art. 46), but 20 years if the victim dies (art. 316, para. 2, in conjunction with art. 46). These are very much in line with the sentences contained in the bill to implement the Convention against Torture.


94. As regards the difference between the offences of torture and assault, it should be noted for the sake of clarity that under the terminology of Aruban criminal law only very serious forms of assault are eligible to be treated as torture. To treat torture as serious assault within the specific meaning of articles 315 and 316 of the Criminal Code would not, however, do justice to the purpose of the provisions of the Convention. Serious assault presupposes the causing of serious physical injury, including the mental injury referred to in article 84, paragraph 2, of the Code. Torture could, however, assume forms that involve severe pain or suffering but leave no physical or mental traces. This is why it would not be sufficient to use the term "serious assault" in the Ordinance implementing the Convention. Although reference is made to assault rather than serious assault in the definition of torture, it should nonetheless not be inferred from this that the definition does not extend to forms of assault that are less serious in terms of the pain and suffering caused than a serious assault occasioning physical injury.


95. The maximum term of imprisonment that can be imposed in Aruba is life (art. 11, para. 1). Article 14 of Aruba's Constitution also provides that the death penalty may not be imposed. It follows that this penalty no longer appears in Aruba's Criminal Code. It should also be noted that the maximum sentences do not apply merely to the perpetrator of the offence but also to those who arrange for or intentionally procure the commission of the offence or participate in it (art. 49).



Article 5

96. Articles 2-8 of Aruba's Criminal Code regulate jurisdiction. Articles 2, 3 and 8 of the Code are important in relation to the Convention. Under these articles the criminal law of Aruba is applicable to any person who commits torture either in Aruba or on board an Aruban aircraft or vessel, insofar as this jurisdiction is not precluded by international law. Aruban legislation therefore complies with the requirement of article 5, paragraph 1 (a), of the Convention.


97. In order to comply in full with the obligations formulated in article 5, paragraph 1 (b) and (c), and paragraph 2, of the Convention, article 5 of the bill to implement the Convention against Torture contains a universal jurisdiction clause. Under this provision, any person who commits torture outside the territory of Aruba commits an offence as defined in articles 1 and 2 of the bill. Although article 5, paragraph 2, of the Criminal Code of Aruba already partially provided for Aruba to have jurisdiction in the cases referred to in article 5, paragraph 1 (b), of the Convention, it was not possible to bring a prosecution in all cases.



Article 6

Officials responsible for investigating offences


98. Under the Code of Criminal Procedure (art. 184) the persons charged with investigating offences are police officers and special police officers, insofar as the latter have been appointed by or on behalf of the Minister of Justice. Others persons charged with investigating offences are those who have been designated in special statutory regulations as being responsible for enforcing the provisions of the regulations, for ensuring their observance or for investigating the offences defined in them (art. 185). Persons who are competent to investigate are the procurators general, the public prosecutors and the local police chiefs. If they exercise this power, they are designated as investigating officials for the purposes of the Code of Criminal Procedure (art. 1). The change in the situation whereby the public prosecutor is no longer charged with investigating but is merely competent to investigate reflects the fact that investigations are the specific responsibility of the criminal investigations department of the police.


99. The public prosecutor or Chief Public Prosecutor supervises the investigation and may issue orders to persons charged with investigating or competent to investigate offences (art. 183, para. 1). As regards general supervision, however, the Chief Public Prosecutor is bound by any instructions given by the Procurator General (art. 4, para. 2, Judiciary Organization Ordinance; see also art. 14, Code of Criminal Procedure). This means that the Procurator General, as head of the Public Prosecutions Service, can issue guidelines concerning investigations and sentencing demands. Only on appeal can the Procurator General give direct instructions for a further investigation (art. 183, para. 3). The public prosecutor has control of the entire preparatory investigation, subject to the provisions in the new Code of Criminal Procedure regarding the intervention of the examining magistrate (art. 183, para. 2).


Consequences of norm violations


100. As a result of the provisions of the conventions relating to human rights and the principles of due process, the courts have gradually acquired a greater freedom to weigh all the interests in an action. This jurisdiction to consider the different interests has supplemented their jurisdiction to apply the law. Inspired by the human rights conventions the courts have in recent decades developed their own "extra-legislative" system of sanctions. If the Public Prosecutions Service infringes the principles of criminal procedure, the courts may rule that its case is inadmissible or, where the infringement is less serious, that its evidence is not admissible. The requirement in each case is that the norm that has been violated is intended for the protection of the suspect and that the interests of the suspect have indeed been prejudiced by the violation.


101. The suspect or his counsel may also refer the question of a norm violation to the courts. Depending on the stage which the proceedings have reached, the judge who hears such an application will be the trial judge, the judge in chambers or the examining magistrate. It should be noted incidentally that the courts may themselves decide of their own volition to consider a norm violation (art. 413, para. 1). The main rule is that the judge examines whether the norm that has been breached can be rectified in a way that is in keeping with the nature and scope of the norm. He may issue the necessary instructions for this purpose (art. 413, para. 1). According to paragraph 2 of article 413, there will be no rectification if:


(a) This is no longer possible in practice;


(b) The Code has made a different provision for the relevant case; or


(c) The interests of the defence or the prosecution would be disproportionately harmed by rectification.


102. Separate provision is made for cases where the period allowed for deprivation of liberty has been exceeded. Under article 413, paragraph 3, this period may be extended in exceptional circumstances. However, this is possible only if the release from custody would undermine faith in the legal system to such an extent that it is definitely in the public interest that the prisoner should continue to be deprived of his liberty. Where this is the case the judge may, at the request of the public prosecutor, fix a new period of detention within not more than 24 hours of the expiry of the original period. In addition, it is necessary that the Code should fix a new period and that the statutory requirements should be fulfilled.


103. When rectification as referred to in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 of article 413 is not possible, the norm violation does not as a rule have any consequences (art. 413, para. 4). Under paragraph 5 of article 413 there are two exceptions to this rule:


(a) Where a special statutory provision already stipulates the consequences of a norm violation (in other words, the act is a procedural nullity);


(b) In the event of infringement of norms essential to the proceedings the judge may decide in his final judgement to impose a procedural sanction, either of his own volition or at the request of the Public Prosecution Service or the defendant (or his counsel).


104. In the latter case (infringement of norms essential to the proceedings) the law provides the following sanctions:


(a) Reduction of sentence (art. 413, para. 5 (a));


(b) Exclusion of evidence (art. 413, para. 5 (b));


(c) Non-admissibility of the case of the public prosecutions service (art. 413, para. 5 (c));


(d) Compensation in addition to or instead of the above-mentioned sanctions (art. 413, para. 6).


105. If the sentence is to be reduced, there must be reasonable grounds for believing that the prejudice caused by the norm violation can be compensated. Evidence may be excluded only if the results of the investigation have been obtained directly by the irregularity and it is also reasonable to assume that the defence has been seriously prejudiced by the use of these results of the investigation. The Public Prosecutions Service's case will be held to be inadmissible only if the way in which the case has been handled has deprived the defendant of a fair trial.


106. The seventh and last paragraph of article 413 refers to all the previous paragraphs: when assessing a norm violation and considering what consequences should be attached to it and when weighing the various interests in a case, the judge must take special account first of all of the nature, importance and scope of the norm that has been violated, second of the seriousness of the violation and third of the degree of culpability of the person who violated the norm.


Pre-trial constraints - general


107. Book 3 of the Code starts with a general provision that codifies some general principles of due process (art. 71). The consent of a judge is required for the application of very far-reaching pre-trial constraints. Three new pre-trial measures are searches in the body (art. 78, para. 3), DNA testing (art. 79) and the tapping of data communications (arts. 167-174).


108. Article 71 sets out the general conditions that apply to the use of every form of pre-trial constraint. It does not alter the specific statutory requirements that govern the application of particular pre-trial constraints. The general conditions of article 71 are a codification of the most common unwritten principles of due process. These principles serve as general guidelines in determining the scope for discretion left by the application criteria (e.g. suspicion, serious objections and interests of the investigation).


109. The application of every form of pre-trial constraint is subject to the following general conditions:


(a) The use of the constraint must not be unreasonable, taking account of the different interests in the case (application must not be arbitrary);

(b) The power to apply a constraint must not be exercised for a purpose other than that for which it was granted (application must not be an abuse of power);


(c) The object of the constraint cannot be achieved in a different, more efficient and less radical way (subsidiarity);


(d) The seriousness of the infringement that will be caused by the constraint is justified by the seriousness of the offence (proportionality).


110. The codification of these principles does not mean that other (unwritten) principles cannot be invoked. This is evident even from the fact that article 413 deals with the consequences of violations of "norms", which are defined in paragraph 1 as being both regulations and rules of unwritten law.


Constraints involving deprivation of liberty: interview, police custody and pre-trial detention


Interview


111. It follows from article 73 that a suspect who has been arrested must be taken to a place of interview. Before the interview starts the suspect is advised of his rights (art. 82). In addition, article 48 provides that a suspect must be given the opportunity to exercise his right to legal assistance. Thereafter there are four possibilities:


(a) The interview starts immediately;


(b) The suspect is immediately detained in police custody;


(c) The suspect is brought before the examining magistrate to be remanded in custody;


(d) The public prosecutor or Chief Public Prosecutor releases the suspect.


112. It follows that an investigating official is not obliged to use all or part of the period of six hours which is allocated for the interview under article 80. Whether the official does so depends entirely on the circumstances. The period of six hours is intended as a maximum; if the interview can be completed more quickly, the suspect may not be forced to "serve out" the six-hour period. Under article 80, paragraph 2, the period starts at the moment when the suspect arrives at the place of interview. If, however, the suspect is not in a proper state to be interviewed, the period starts when he is.


113. In principle, the period between 10 p.m. and 8 a.m. is not counted in determining the maximum period. However, the Chief Public Prosecutor may direct that an interview started before 10 p.m. will continue thereafter if this in the interests of the investigation. The period of the interview after 10 p.m. is deducted from the six hours (art. 80, para. 1).


Detention in police custody


114. The public prosecutor or Chief Public Prosecutor before whom the suspect is brought or who has himself arrested the suspect may order after the interview that the suspect be detained in police custody in the interests of the investigation (art. 83, para. 1). Before the order is made the suspect is questioned by the public prosecutor or Chief Public Prosecutor. He is also informed that he will be assigned legal counsel free of charge for the duration of the police custody (art. 83, para. 2).


115. Under article 86 detention in police custody is possible only in the event of an offence for which pre-trial detention is permitted. If the trial has started, such an order may no longer be made for the same offence.


116. Article 87 specifies the periods. The order for detention in police custody remains in force for a maximum of two days. Only the public prosecutor is empowered to extend this order and may do this once for a maximum of eight days in the interests of the examination. An extension is permissible only in the event of urgent necessity. In keeping with the Brogan judgement of the European Court of Human Rights, the new Code provides that a suspect must be brought before the examining magistrate as quickly as possible, but in any event no later than 24 hours after the public prosecutor has ordered an extension of police custody. The maximum period that may elapse between the arrest of the suspect and his appearance before the examining magistrate is 3 days and 16 hours.


Pre-trial detention


117. Title VIII of Book 3 deals with pre-trial detention (remand in custody by order of the examining magistrate, further remand in custody by order of the district court and arrest by order of the district court). Article 100 specifies the cases in which pre-trial detention may be ordered:


"1. An order for pre-trial detention may be made where there is a suspicion of:
"(a) an indictable offence which, according to the statutory definition, carries a term of imprisonment of four years or more, or
"(b) one of the indictable offences described in article 204, paragraphs 1 and 2, articles 236, 245, paragraph 3, 259, 266 and 298, paragraph 1, articles 321a, 334, 339, 339a and 366, paragraph 1, and articles 368, 404, 405, 410 and 431 of the Criminal Code.
"2. The order may also be made if the suspect has no fixed address or place of residence in Aruba and he is suspected of an indictable offence that carries a term of imprisonment."
118. An order as referred to in article 100 may be made under article 101 only if there are "serious objections" against the suspect. In addition there should be a real risk that he will abscond or a belief that he constitutes a real threat to society (art. 101, para. 1). Article 101, paragraph 2, gives an exhaustive list of the grounds for a belief that a suspect constitutes a real threat to society. In brief, there must have been a serious breach of the legal order or a danger of recidivism or perversion of the course of justice.


119. An order for remand in custody is valid for a maximum of eight days and may be extended once for a maximum of eight days. The orders are always made by the examining magistrate on the application of the public prosecutor (arts. 92 and 93). The examining magistrate hears the suspect either before making the first order or at the earliest opportunity thereafter (art. 92, para. 3). Where application is made for the remand in custody to be extended, the examining magistrate should question the suspect if he believes there are grounds for doing so (art. 93, para. 3).


120. Before the start of the trial, an order for further remand in custody (art. 95) or arrest and remand in custody (art. 96) is made by the examining magistrate on the application of the public prosecutor. Under article 98, paragraph 1, an order for further remand in custody or for arrest and remand in custody by the examining magistrate remains in force for a period to be specified by the examining magistrate but not exceeding 60 days (art. 98, para. 3). In principle, the trial should therefore start within 90 days of the date on which the order for pre-trial detention takes effect. In special cases, however, the order may be extended once for a maximum of 30 days (art. 98, para. 4).


121. If the order for further remand in custody or for arrest and remand in custody has been made at the trial, it remains in force for an indefinite period and until it is cancelled. The same applies if the trial has started within the period of 60 days referred to in article 98, paragraph 1 (art. 98, para. 2).


122. An order for pre-trial detention may be cancelled at any time. This is done either by the examining magistrate or by the court depending on the stage of the investigation (art. 103, para. 1). A suspect who applies for the first time for the remand to be cancelled is given the opportunity to be heard about the application. Thereafter the judge is no longer obliged to hear the suspect on such an application. Appeal too lies only once against an order for pre-trial detention. By way of compensation, article 98, paragraph 5, provides that the suspect is given the opportunity to be heard on each application under article 98 (art. 98, para. 5).


123. The Code also provides for the possibility of suspending and postponing pre-trial detention (arts. 111-118). Depending on the stage of the proceedings, either the judge who ordered the pre-trial detention or the court that tries (or last tried) the case is competent to hear such an application (art. 114).


124. Part 7, Title VIII, Book 3 of the Code deals with pre-trial detention in the case of final judgements. Paragraphs 1 and 2 of article 105 are intended, in brief, to prevent a situation in which the duration of the pre-trial detention exceeds the duration of any non-suspended custodial sentence that is imposed. In the event of a constraint measure which entails - or may entail -deprivation of liberty the pre-trial detention therefore continues. If the notice of summons and accusation is quashed (art. 105, para. 5) or if appeal is lodged against acquittal on the facts or on a point of law (art. 105, para. 6), the trial (at first instance or on appeal) should start within three weeks of the final judgement.


125. If appeal is lodged after the final judgement at first instance, the orders referred to in articles 96 to 103 are made by the Joint Court of Justice (art. 108, para. 1). An order for further remand in custody or for arrest and remand in custody is valid for a period not exceeding five months and may be extended by the Joint Court of Justice once for a period not exceeding 30 days if there are good reasons for doing so. However, the Joint Court of Justice should assess within 30 days of appeal being lodged whether the cases and the grounds referred to in articles 100 and 101 are still present (art. 108, para. 3).


126. Article 108, paragraph 4, provides that an order for further remand in custody or for arrest and remand in custody applies for an indefinite period (until no appeal is possible) if it has been made during or after the trial or if the trial has started within the period specified in article 108, paragraph 3. This also applies if appeal in cassation has been lodged against the final judgement or if the Supreme Court has referred the case to the Joint Court of Justice in accordance with article 14 of the Cassation Regulations of the Netherlands Antilles and Aruba.


Preliminary judicial investigation


The structure of the preliminary judicial investigation


127. The Code is intended to reduce the role played by the examining magistrate as an extension of the investigating authorities. In fact, the examining magistrate has a passive role that consists of monitoring and checking. It is the public prosecutor who has complete charge of the preliminary investigation as a fully fledged dominus litis. At decisive moments his acts are checked or legitimated by the examining magistrate. This principle is reflected in article 155, paragraph 2; the public prosecutor has control of the entire preliminary investigation, without prejudice to the provisions concerning the intervention of the examining magistrate.


128. The passive function of the examining magistrate is evident, among other things, in relation to the use of pre-trial constraints. In principle, the examining magistrate cannot apply a constraint of his own volition either in the course of the preliminary investigation or otherwise; as a rule, he is dependent on an application by the public prosecutor. However, there are the following exceptions to this principle:


(a) The seizure of all objects liable to seizure (art. 130);


(b) An order for the surrender or transfer of any object liable to seizure (art. 131);


(c) An order for the surrender of "items of mail" insofar as they are obviously intended for or sent by the suspect (art. 140 in conjunction with arts. 127-129).


129. After the completion of the preliminary judicial investigation the examining magistrate may exercise his powers (including the power to impose constraints) of his own volition during any investigation order by the trial judge or the court sitting in chambers. In such circumstances there is no objection since the examining magistrate is acting as on the instructions of an independent court. The Code specifies four cases in which further investigation may be required:


(a) Further investigation after completion of the preliminary judicial investigation but before the trial starts (art. 274);


(b) Further investigation to determine whether a notice of summons and accusation is well-founded (art. 359);


(c) Referral back to the examining magistrate during the trial (art. 359);


(d) Referral back to the examining magistrate after resumption of the trial where the investigation has proved to be incomplete after due deliberation (arts. 390-391 in conjunction with art. 359).


130. The passive position of the examining magistrate is also apparent in relation to the application of constraints. An order for detention in police custody is made by the public prosecutor or Chief Public Prosecutor. Any extension is ordered by the public prosecutor. This extension is reviewed by the examining magistrate within 24 hours (art. 89, para. 1). The orders for pre-trial detention are always made by the examining magistrate on the application of the public prosecutor, but they are in the nature of an authorization. The public prosecutor does not have a duty to make use of this procedure.


131. Further evidence that the public prosecutor is in charge of the entire preliminary investigation is the fact that the use of a special constraint (see Book 3) is never dependent on the condition that a preliminary judicial investigation has been or will be instituted. Naturally, however, the authorization of the examining magistrate is always required for the application of very far-reaching constraints.


132. The examining magistrate still plays the pivotal role in interviewing and examining suspects, witnesses and experts. Only in the context of a preliminary judicial investigation can a suspect who is at liberty and any witnesses and experts be summoned to appear before the examining magistrate. Although the public prosecutor can appoint experts under article 190, only the examining magistrate can swear them in (art. 263), compel them to appear (art. 262, in conjunction with art. 247, para. 2) and impose a duty of secrecy on them (art. 271).


133. The scaled-down role of the examining magistrate in the investigation means that in his review role he can act as the appeal body for those cases in which the suspect wishes to challenge the actions of the public prosecutor.



The course of the preliminary judicial investigation: application and termination


134. If the public prosecutor considers that a preliminary judicial investigation is necessary in connection with an offence in accordance with the provisions of article 187, he applies to the examining magistrate for an investigation to be instituted immediately (art. 221). The suspect too can try to have an investigation started if he is in pre-trial detention and has not yet been committed for trial (art. 224, para. 2).


135. The termination of a preliminary judicial investigation is irrevocable (art. 272). Further investigation by the examining magistrate is possible only if he is so instructed by the court sitting in chambers or the trial judge.


136. The termination of a preliminary judicial investigation (in conjunction with the decision on whether or not to continue the prosecution) is regulated as follows. The examining magistrate terminates an investigation in two cases (art. 272). First of all, he terminates it if he believes that the investigation has been completed or there are no grounds for continuing it. In such cases the public prosecutor arranges within a month of the decision to terminate the investigation for the suspect to be committed for trial (art. 275 in conjunction with art. 279, para. 1) or to be sent a notice of discontinuation of prosecution (art. 279, para. 1). In the latter case the prosecution is terminated. Unless new evidence becomes known, the suspect can no longer be prosecuted in law for that offence (art. 179, para. 1, in conjunction with art. 282). In addition, every pre-trial detention order is cancelled by such notice (art. 283).


137. Second, the examining magistrate terminates a preliminary judicial investigation if the public prosecutor informs him in writing that the prosecution will be dropped. In such a case article 276 provides that the public prosecutor must inform the suspect immediately that he will not be prosecuted further in respect of the offence to which the investigation related (para. 1). In addition, every pre-trial detention order is cancelled at the moment of the decision to terminate the investigation (para. 2).


138. Under article 274, further investigation may be carried out by the examining magistrate after the termination of the preliminary judicial investigation and before the start of the trial.


The trial


Instituting proceedings


139. Usually proceedings are instituted by the service on the suspect of a notice of summons and accusation issued by the public prosecutor. The proceedings start at the moment of service (art. 284). Article 285 lists the requirements which the notice of summons must satisfy. The general requirement is that the suspect must reasonably be deemed capable of understanding the charge against him. Article 290 specifies that the period of the notice of summons should be seven days in normal cases. Until the trial has started, the public prosecutor can cancel the notice of summons (art. 291). Articles 299-301, which are in a separate part, deal with the institution of appeal proceedings.


Judicial measures in cases of urgency


140. What is of special significance is that the public prosecutor has the power in criminal proceedings to apply to the court on the basis of considerations relating to criminal procedure for measures that are not regulated by law. In this way the public prosecutor is able to respond adequately in the pre-trial period to a breach of the legal relationship between the parties concerned caused by the offence. For example, in some circumstances it may not be possible to arrange for the immediate termination of the situation constituting the offence or to exclude the possibility of a repetition of the offence (by pre-trial detention or by conditions imposed on suspension of such detention). The public prosecutor can also act more effectively to deal with acts of the suspect which improperly disrupt the balance of the procedural system of checks and balances (e.g. by unlawful influencing of the parties to the proceedings). Examples of measures for which application may be made by the public prosecutor, as cited in the explanatory memorandum to the bill, are a ban on committing any further offence and, in special cases, house arrest.



Article 7

141. Under articles 2 to 8 of Aruba's Criminal Code and article 5 of the bill to implement the Convention against Torture, Aruba has jurisdiction over crimes of torture no matter where and by whom they are committed. This means that the criminal justice authorities can prosecute the perpetrator even if the offence has been committed elsewhere, provided that the perpetrator is in Aruba. The obligation to prosecute in such cases - an obligation which follows directly from article 7 of the Convention - can therefore be fulfilled.


142. In such a case the ordinary rules of criminal procedure that are applicable under Aruba's Code of Criminal Procedure apply. It should be noted with regard to article 7, paragraph 3, of the Convention that the rules of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms are - in any event insofar as they are relevant - directly applicable.



Article 8

143. Under article 3, paragraph 1 (h), of the Charter for the Kingdom of the Netherlands extradition is a Kingdom matter. This means that Aruba and the Netherlands Antilles cannot regulate the subject of extradition independently. The existing legislation on extradition consists of the Netherlands-Antilles Extradition Order (published in the Official Bulletin of the Netherlands Antilles, 1983 volume, No. 84), i.e. an Order in Council of the Kingdom. The surrender of war criminals is another subject that is regulated in the case of Aruba and the Netherlands Antilles by an Order in Council adopted by the Government of the Kingdom, namely the Surrender of War Criminals (Netherlands Antilles and Aruba) Order (published in the Official Bulletin of the Netherlands Antilles, 1954 volume, No. 115). It would be advisable to include the Convention against Torture in the list of conventions given in article 1 of the Order that can serve as a ground for extradition.


144. The Netherlands Antilles Extradition Order is also due for review, and discussions on this subject are currently in progress between the parties. Although this Order does not expressly provide that extradition can take place only pursuant to a convention, it follows from article 2, paragraph 3, of the Constitution of the Kingdom of the Netherlands that extradition should be based on a convention. Since this requirement is not elaborated in the Netherlands Antilles Extradition Order, this order - unlike the Netherlands Extradition Act - does not contain a summary of conventions that can serve as a basis for extradition.



Article 10

145. Since obtaining its separate constitutional status in 1986 Aruba has regulated independently all matters relating to the police and the prison system. One result of this has been increased emphasis on the correct treatment of prisoners and arrested persons in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution of Aruba safeguarding human rights.


Aruba's police force


146. Police training from the basic level upwards deals with the subject of universal human rights, including the rights of suspects and persons under arrest. The training course for police certificate I includes lessons on the theme of human rights and police ethics. This is also a compulsory subject at levels II, III and IV.


147. As regards in-service training for the police, the subject of human rights will also be covered in a basic skills course due to start shortly. This will take the form of workshops on the treatment of persons under arrest, and will be given on the spot by various bodies including the Aruban branch of Amnesty International. The police force thinks it important that the course should be tailored as far as possible to meet the practical requirements of the job. The basic skills course is intended to provide training for the police in those areas not otherwise covered in police training.


148. The guidelines relating to police treatment of persons under arrest are laid down in the Code of Criminal Procedure and, more specifically, in police orders. These guidelines describe in some detail the procedures for arrest, custody, interrogation and treatment of prisoners.


Aruban Correctional Institution (KIA)


149. During their training the staff of the KIA are taught about the rights of prisoners and human rights in general. Among the subjects dealt with are criminal law, the law of criminal procedure, introduction to law, prison law, first aid, conflict resolution, use of firearms, internal prison rules, social skills, human rights and ethics, sport and self-defence. It is intended in the future to alter the KIA training decree so that the staff receive retraining and further training. The KIA currently employs two social workers to assist and counsel the inmates, and also to train the staff.


150. It is planned to change the training in the near future to provide separate courses for two distinct jobs, namely a course for prison officers whose duties will consist of guarding, looking after and counselling the prisoners and another for prison guards who will be explicitly responsible for the security of the building or the staff and for the transport of prisoners. In anticipation of an amendment to the training decree, 23 people are now being trained as prison officers.



Articles 11 and 15

151. The general rule of conduct is that prisoners should be treated with the utmost care. A police officer is obliged to advise a suspect of his rights both at the time of the arrest for a cr


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: private eye on January 07, 2008, 03:16:24 PM
Even though the above post is from Amnesty International, it contains an English summary of Aruban law, for what its worth.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 07, 2008, 03:22:37 PM

PI ... considering what Hans Mos has put the parents of Natalee through in the past month ... I am not about to give this guy the benefit of the doubt at this point.

If Hans Mos has a master plan ... he certainly has a cruel way of going about it.  In November, 2007 ... Dave and Beth climbed aboard that emotional roller coaster once again ... hoping against all hope that maybe ... just maybe ... Aruba was going to come through ... hoping that justice for Natalee was finally going to prevail.  Less than one month later ...

PI ... we both have differing perspectives regarding this topic and ... that is OK. I will gladly eat crow if I am wrong.  :lol:

Janet


Yep yep yep. Remember how we gave Prosecutor Karin Janssen a free ticket for almost two years  until we started finding out the real dirt on her. All she was doing was stalling for time, then she flees the country to safety in Holland like all guilty parties do.

Hans Mos is deja vu all over again.

Karen Janssen's plan failed ... how many times?  Something is not right.

Dayhiker ... I am of the opinion that the November, 2007 detainment of Joran, Deepak and Satish was Aruban's attempt to redeem herself in world opinion prior to "dismissing" the Natalee Holloway case ... an attempt to convince America that everything possible was done to bring the suspects to trial by a new prosecutor ... an attempt which backfired miserably.

Janet

++++++++++

INITIAL ARRESTS - JUNE, 2005

Mickey John:  first and second-degree murder and capital kidnapping.

Abraham Jones:  first and second-degree murder and capital kidnapping.
 
Joran van der Sllot:  Suspicion of murder and kidnapping as well as being an accessory to murder

Deepak Kalpoe:   Suspicion of murder and kidnapping as well as being an accessory to murder.

Satish Kalpoe:  Suspicion of murder and kidnapping as well as being an accessory to murder.

Steve Croes:   Suspicion of murder and kidnapping as well as being an accessory to murder.   

Paulus van der Sloot:  complicity to pre-meditated murder, complicity to kidnapping and murder and kidnapping.


SUBSEQUENT ARRESTS - APRIL, 2006

Geoffrey van Cromvoirt:  criminal offenses that may be related to the disappearance" of Natalee Holloway.

Guido Weaver:  Assisting in the murder, heavy battery and kidnapping" of the teen


KALPOE BROTHERS - SECOND ARREST - AUGUST, 2005

Deepak Kalpoe and Satish Kalpoe:  Suspected of the primary criminal act of together with other people committing premeditated murder, alternately together with other people murdering somebody, more alternately rob a person of her liberty with fatal consequences and even more alternately, raping somebody and new suspicions.


FREDDY - UNRELATED SUSPICIONS - AUGUST, 2005

Freddy Alexander Zedan-Arambatzis: suspicion of having unspecified "physical contact" with a female minor.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: private eye on January 07, 2008, 03:27:58 PM

PI ... considering what Hans Mos has put the parents of Natalee through in the past month ... I am not about to give this guy the benefit of the doubt at this point.

If Hans Mos has a master plan ... he certainly has a cruel way of going about it.  In November, 2007 ... Dave and Beth climbed aboard that emotional roller coaster once again ... hoping against all hope that maybe ... just maybe ... Aruba was going to come through ... hoping that justice for Natalee was finally going to prevail.  Less than one month later ...

PI ... we both have differing perspectives regarding this topic and ... that is OK. I will gladly eat crow if I am wrong.  :lol:

Janet


Yep yep yep. Remember how we gave Prosecutor Karin Janssen a free ticket for almost two years  until we started finding out the real dirt on her. All she was doing was stalling for time, then she flees the country to safety in Holland like all guilty parties do.

Hans Mos is deja vu all over again.

Karen Janssen's plan failed ... how many times?  Something is not right.

Dayhiker ... I am of the opinion that the November, 2007 detainment of Joran, Deepak and Satish was Aruban's attempt to redeem herself in world opinion prior to "dismissing" the Natalee Holloway case ... an attempt to convince America that everything possible was done to bring the suspects to trial by a new prosecutor ... an attempt which backfired miserably.

Janet

++++++++++

INITIAL ARRESTS - JUNE, 2005

Mickey John:  first and second-degree murder and capital kidnapping.

Abraham Jones:  first and second-degree murder and capital kidnapping.
 
Joran van der Sllot:  Suspicion of murder and kidnapping as well as being an accessory to murder

Deepak Kalpoe:   Suspicion of murder and kidnapping as well as being an accessory to murder.

Satish Kalpoe:  Suspicion of murder and kidnapping as well as being an accessory to murder.

Steve Croes:   Suspicion of murder and kidnapping as well as being an accessory to murder.   

Paulus van der Sloot:  complicity to pre-meditated murder, complicity to kidnapping and murder and kidnapping.


SUBSEQUENT ARRESTS - APRIL, 2006

Geoffrey van Cromvoirt:  criminal offenses that may be related to the disappearance" of Natalee Holloway.

Guido Weaver:  Assisting in the murder, heavy battery and kidnapping" of the teen


KALPOE BROTHERS - SECOND ARREST - AUGUST, 2005

Deepak Kalpoe and Satish Kalpoe:  Suspected of the primary criminal act of together with other people committing premeditated murder, alternately together with other people murdering somebody, more alternately rob a person of her liberty with fatal consequences and even more alternately, raping somebody and new suspicions.


FREDDY - UNRELATED SUSPICIONS - AUGUST, 2005

Freddy Alexander Zedan-Arambatzis: suspicion of having unspecified "physical contact" with a female minor.

If I was a betting man inclined to bet on my position, I think I would pass:) The only crow you will possibly eat will most likely be if I can eat all of mine!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 07, 2008, 03:29:32 PM
http://wwwserver.law.wits.ac.za/humanrts/cat/netherlands1998.html
University of Minnesota Human Rights

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Committee Against Torture, Consideration of reports submitted by States Parties under article 19 of the Convention, Netherlands - Antilles and Aruba - (1998).

Part Two

Aruba

I. PENAL AND PENITENTIARY SYSTEM

<snipped>


Thank you PI.  This is definitely a Tamikosmom's keeper.   :lol:

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 07, 2008, 03:31:37 PM

If I was a betting man inclined to bet on my position, I think I would pass:) The only crow you will possibly eat will most likely be if I can eat all of mine!!!!!!!!!!!!!

No way!!!  That is not the way it works.   :lol:

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Dayhiker on January 07, 2008, 03:38:30 PM

Yep yep yep. Remember how we gave Prosecutor Karin Janssen a free ticket for almost two years  until we started finding out the real dirt on her. All she was doing was stalling for time, then she flees the country to safety in Holland like all guilty parties do.

Hans Mos is deja vu all over again.

Karen Janssen's plan failed ... how many times?  Something is not right.

Dayhiker ... I am of the opinion that the November, 2007 detainment of Joran, Deepak and Satish was Aruban's attempt to redeem herself in world opinion prior to "dismissing" the Natalee Holloway case ... an attempt to convince America that everything possible was done to bring the suspects to trial by a new prosecutor ... an attempt which backfired miserably.

Janet

++++++++++


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: mishy on January 07, 2008, 03:48:04 PM
Hi monkeys!

Has there been any news on the underwater search? I've been severely outta touch...Hope you are all doing well...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Dayhiker on January 07, 2008, 03:48:35 PM

Janet- Sorry about that errant post. Let's review Karin Jannsen for a moment.

1- As the Prosecutor she would make the ultimate call on not arresting the suspects for 10 days.

2- It was Karin who said she could go in like cowboys after she had done the very same thing to the black security guards.

3- She knew one of her own prosecutors staff, Ben Vocking, took a leave of absence to help his good friend Paulus van der Sloot.

4- She, not Dompig, would have made out the original search warrant the Judge Bob Wit claims was for a limited search.

5- Karin knew Koen Gottenbos needed to be questioned but did nothing about it, ultimately leading to one her staff resigning the case.

6- Jannsen stalled the investigation for two years and refused to communicate with the family or media, then ended up leaving for Holland.

7- Karin Jannsen gave the security guards' lawyer both the Kalpoes' early statements but refused to give them Joran's, saying his were "irrelevant."


In essence, this woman is just as responsible for the cover-up as anyone else.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 07, 2008, 04:25:24 PM

Janet- Sorry about that errant post. Let's review Karin Jannsen for a moment.

1- As the Prosecutor she would make the ultimate call on not arresting the suspects for 10 days.

2- It was Karin who said she could go in like cowboys after she had done the very same thing to the black security guards.

3- She knew one of her own prosecutors staff, Ben Vocking, took a leave of absence to help his good friend Paulus van der Sloot.

4- She, not Dompig, would have made out the original search warrant the Judge Bob Wit claims was for a limited search.

5- Karin knew Koen Gottenbos needed to be questioned but did nothing about it, ultimately leading to one her staff resigning the case.

6- Jannsen stalled the investigation for two years and refused to communicate with the family or media, then ended up leaving for Holland.

7- Karin Jannsen gave the security guards' lawyer both the Kalpoes' early statements but refused to give them Joran's, saying his were "irrelevant."


In essence, this woman is just as responsible for the cover-up as anyone else.


I agree Dayhiker.

My contention ...the coverup to protect Paulus and Joran encompasses ... the Aruban Law Enforcement ... the Aruban Prosecutor ... the Aruban Justice Department ... various levels of the Aruban and Dutch governments as well as ... the judiciary.

Janet

++++++++++++++

http://nataleesfreebirds.blogspot.com/2007/08/karin-janssen.html
KARIN JANSSEN
Woman of the Year or Disgrace to her Profession?



Jossy Mansur
NANCY GRACE
October 4, 2005


GRACE: … Jossy, regarding the connection, what I perceived to be a close connection between the judge, Paulus Van Der Sloot and the retired chief of police who initially handled Natalee`s case, Van Der Stratten, were they friends?

MANSUR: Of course, they were friends. It stands to reason they were friends because Paul Van Der Sloot had many friends within the police department; he had many friends within the Department of Justice. And he had many friends with -- and he was friendly with all the judges in Aruba. He worked out of the same office as they did and did the same work


Paulus van der Sloot
NOVA - TWAN HUYS
June 28, 2005


VAN DER SLOOT: That gives a feeling of absurdity. It is indeed almost unimaginable that by someone you actually know very well, where you worked together with for a long time, that that one comes to tell you that you are suspected of complicity to murder.

HUYS: Who was that in your case?

VAN DER SLOOT: That was, in this case, that was the leader of the team of police commissioners.

HUYS: Jan van der Straaten.

VAN DER SLOOT: That was Jan van der Straaten, yes.

HUYS: And you know each other very well?

VAN DER SLOOT: Yes


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: downloadingdaddy on January 07, 2008, 04:59:34 PM
Hi monkeys!

Has there been any news on the underwater search? I've been severely outta touch...Hope you are all doing well...




 X. Persistence

Update: Sun 06-Jan 1635
The seas abated sufficiently to maintain our progress through the night and into the early morning hours. The Persistence arrived dockside around 0430 hrs this morning. Rested and ready, the crew makes ready for departure at 1515 hrs. Now a routine, the crew toss the lines and we depart. Leaving the dock past the behemoth cruise ships reminds me of the opening scene from "Space Balls". Their shear immensity projects an image of being impervious to the seas.
Offshore, the seas are the same as yesterday, 5-8ft with the occasional 10ft swell.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: private eye on January 07, 2008, 05:15:24 PM

The rest of my previous post from Human Rights University of Minnesota. The file only partially pasted the first time




Articles 11 and 15

151. The general rule of conduct is that prisoners should be treated with the utmost care. A police officer is obliged to advise a suspect of his rights both at the time of the arrest for a criminal offence and at the start of the interview. The internal hierarchy of the police and the division of responsibilities and powers serve in general as a guarantee that a check is kept on the proper treatment of the suspects and prisoners. In addition, any dysfunctional behaviour of police officers is regularly raised in job performance interviews.


Interview rules


152. The Code of Criminal Procedure contains regulations that expressly govern interviews of suspects (see paras. 111-113 above).


153. Article 81, paragraph 1, of the Code of Criminal Procedure also provides that persons who are held in police custody should not be subjected to any limitations other than those that are absolutely necessary for the purpose of their detention. An investigating official should also inform a suspect before his interview that he is not obliged to answer questions (art. 82, para. 1 (b), Code of Criminal Procedure).


154. The official conducting the interview should also refrain from doing anything intended to obtain a statement that cannot be said to have been freely made. It follows that he must refrain from assault, mental or physical coercion, promises, etc. Failure to observe this regulation means that the investigation is void and that the trial judge may refuse to accept the official report containing the results of the investigation as evidence of the offence with which the suspect is charged. The results obtained in this way may be treated by the judge as evidence unlawfully obtained. Unless there is sufficient other evidence available that has been lawfully obtained, the accused will be acquitted.


155. The first safeguard which a suspect has is that he must be informed of his rights at the time of his arrest (art. I.5, para. 3 (b) of the Constitution of Aruba). Furthermore, a suspect has the following safeguards under the new Code of Criminal Procedure. Article 50, paragraph 1, provides that the suspect has the right to refuse to answer questions. The principle underlying this rule is that no one can be obliged or forced to incriminate himself. This is one of the basic principles of criminal procedure. The suspect is normally advised of his rights at the moment when he is taken to the place of interview and in any event before the interview starts (art. 82, para. 1).


156. In addition to the oral notification referred to in paragraph 1 of article 82, the suspect is given a form stating his rights in a language he understands (art. 82, para. 2). The model of the form is adopted by order. The form is always available in at least the following languages: Dutch, Papiamento, English and Spanish. If there is serious doubt as to whether a suspect has understood the notification, the interview does not start until the assistance of an interpreter has been obtained (art. 82, para. 4).


157. Other safeguards are provided for by article 48, paragraph 3, of the Code of Criminal Procedure. This article gives the suspect the right to legal assistance. The intention of the legislator is that a suspect should be advised of his rights before the start of the first interview (police interview). If the suspect states that he wishes to exercise this right and this decision is the product of his free and rational choice, the interview must be postponed until counsel has talked to the suspect. An exception to this rule is possible only if the investigation does not admit of any delay or it would not be reasonable to await the arrival of counsel.


158. Article 49 of the Code of Criminal Procedure gives the suspect the right to legal assistance during the interview. A suspect is entitled to obtain legal assistance in all cases in which he is interviewed in accordance with the provisions of the Code. Counsel is given the opportunity to make remarks during the interview. An exception to this is article 48, paragraph 4: counsel is not entitled to be present during the interviews conducted by investigating officials - these are the police interviews.



Article 12

159. The Public Prosecution Service investigates any suspected cases of torture. The head of the Public Prosecution Service - the Procurator General - is empowered to issue instructions to officials charged with police duties to prevent, detect and investigate indictable or summary offences if he considers this to be necessary in the interests of justice.


160. The National Criminal Investigation Department can be assigned to investigate criminal acts performed by police officers and special officials with police powers. The National Criminal Investigation Department was established by ministerial decision of 23 February 1993. If the Chief Public Prosecutor considers it necessary, he may request the Procurator General to order an investigation by the National Criminal Investigation Department.


161. The general criterion is that the National Criminal Investigation Department is used in cases where there must be no doubt whatever about the objectiveness of the investigation. The objectiveness of such an investigation may be assumed since the National Criminal Investigation Department is relatively remote from the police officers and officials with police powers. The Department is called in to investigate cases of the use of force which are reported to the Public Prosecution Service in accordance with the rules of the National Decree on the Use of Force and Safety Searches. This applies in any event where the force employed causes death or serious physical injury.


162. A police officer is authorized to use force against persons or property in the lawful discharge of his office or duties, although this is subject to strict rules. For example, the use of force must be justified by its aim, taking account of its dangers, and it must not be possible to achieve the aim in some other way (art. 3 of the National Police Ordinance, AB 1988, No. 18). Moreover, the use of force must be preceded wherever possible by a warning (art. 2). The use of force is regulated in greater detail in a separate national decree (the Decree on the Use of Force and Safety Searches by the Police; AB 1988, No. 60).


163. Under article 11 of the National Decree on the Use of Force and Safety Searches by the Police, every police officer who employs force against persons in the course of his duties must immediately report this and the reasons for and consequences of the force to his superior or department head, who must then immediately inform the head of the police force. If the force employed by the officer has resulted in physical injury of more than a minor nature and in all cases in which a firearm has been used, the public prosecutor must be notified by or on behalf of the head of the police force, first of all orally without delay and thereafter in a written report within 48 hours (art. 11, para. 6, of the National Decree on the Use of Force and Safety Searches by the Police). Whether the police force itself or the National Criminal Investigation Department is charged with the investigation depends on the gravity of the offence.


164. Investigations of offences by staff of the Aruban Correctional Institution (KIA) are governed by the same rules as investigations concerning police officers and officials with special police powers. Cases involving the use of force should also be dealt with in the same way, although if the force has not caused death or serious physical injury and no injury has been caused by the use of firearms the investigation will in principle be carried out by the Aruban Police Force. If an arrested person or prisoner dies while in the custody of the KIA the investigation is conducted by the National Criminal Investigation Department.


165. The Board of Visitors is responsible for ensuring that the rules are properly observed within the KIA and has access to the KIA at all times. Once a month a representative of the Board is present to hear the complaints of the inmates. Complaints regarding prison guards are then discussed with the governor. If necessary, the Board reports the matter to the Minister of Justice. Neither the governor nor the Board is competent to impose sanctions. Disciplinary measures are taken in Cabinet and then approved by the governor.



Article 13

Suspect and counsel


166. Article 47 of the Code of Criminal Procedure states:


"1. A suspect is a person who is reasonably suspected on the basis of facts and circumstances of being guilty of a criminal offence.
"2. During a prosecution a suspect is a person against whom the prosecution is brought."
The facts and circumstances referred to in paragraph 1 should provide grounds for a reasonable suspicion of guilt: the view of the investigating official is therefore not necessarily decisive. In addition, the suspicion of guilt should be limited as far as possible to one or more given persons: an abstract indication of a widely defined group of people cannot as a rule provide an acceptable ground in law for suspicion of a criminal offence.


167. The Code provides a system of early intervention. Each suspect who is detained in police custody is assigned counsel as soon as the detention order is made (art. 62, para. 1). Depending on the financial resources of the suspect the assignment is made either at the expense of the suspect or free of charge (or partially free of charge) (art. 61). If no order for police custody is made, a person suspected of an indictable offence who has been found to lack financial resources is assigned counsel at his request as soon as the prosecution starts (art. 63).


168. A suspect is entitled to inspect the case documents. As soon as the preliminary judicial investigation has been concluded or, if there has been no investigation, as soon as the suspect has been committed for trial, the suspect's right to view the case documents may no longer be subject to restrictions (art. 53). In principle, the above also applies if any investigation has not resulted or will not result in a prosecution (art. 51, para. 3). During the preliminary investigation the public prosecutor may refuse to show the suspect certain case documents if this is definitely necessary in the interests of the investigation (art. 51, para. 1). The documents referred to in article 52 may never be withheld from the suspect.


169. Finally, the Code contains a number of rights inspired by the European Convention on Human Rights. For example, articles 55-56 of the Code lay down the right to a hearing within a reasonable time as guaranteed in article 6, paragraph 1, of the European Convention, and article 318, paragraph 3, of the Code confers the right to obtain the attendance and examination of witnesses for the defence on the same conditions as witnesses for the prosecution. The rules for bringing the suspect before the examining magistrate have also been brought into line with article 5, paragraph 3, of the European Convention and the way in which the European Court of Human Rights interpreted the expression "brought promptly" in the Brogan judgement.


Judicial measures and urgent necessity


170. People whose interests are directly affected by a criminal case may apply to the criminal courts for an "interim injunction". The Code makes a special effort to ensure that interests that have been violated by the offence receive balanced treatment. Naturally, the legislator was not able to make provisions to cover every eventuality in practice. This is why the interim injunction procedure in criminal cases may provide a remedy. If an interested party needs a more specific measure for which the law makes no provision, he can take action independently. For example, the victim may request a restraining order in cases in which the suspect is not or cannot be remanded in custody (under such an order the suspect is barred from entering certain streets or neighbourhoods). In addition, a third party with an interest in the case could request leave to inspect the case documents with a view to legal action to be instituted by him.


Judicial impartiality


171. Article 304 of the Code has been drafted to take account of the De Cubber and Hauschildt cases heard by the European Court of Human Rights, both of which concerned a trial judge who had previously been involved in the preliminary investigation. Article 304 provides as follows:


"A judge who has carried out any investigation as examining magistrate or taken any decision in the case shall not take part in the trial, on pain of nullity."
172. As regards an examining magistrate who has taken any decision in the preliminary investigation, the Supreme Court has ruled that the mere involvement of a judge in decisions on pre-trial detention does not affect his impartiality. However, the situation is different where a decision in the preliminary investigation deals in such depth with the question of guilt that the suspect's fear that the judge is not impartial is objectively justified. This was the case in the Hauschildt case: according to the European Court of Human Rights there is too little difference between the question of whether a "particularly confirmed suspicion" exists with regard to a suspect (a requirement in Denmark for the application of pre-trial detention) and the question of guilt. As the Code also excludes as trial judge a person who has taken any decision in the preliminary investigation, this in any event avoids discussion of the question of whether the pre-trial detention requirement of "serious objections" does not in some cases go just as deeply into the question of guilt.


Anonymous witnesses


173. Although the legislator recognizes that the admission of statements by anonymous witnesses may prejudice the fairness of the trial, the Code nonetheless contains an arrangement for witnesses who have been threatened. The legislator justifies the restriction of the suspect's right of examination on the grounds that it is not acceptable in a State governed by the rule of law that the evidence - and the judgement of the court based on it - should be affected by the threat of violence. The European Convention on Human Rights (in particular art. 6, para. 3, opening words and (d)) does not exclude evidence obtained by means of the statement of an anonymous witness made in the preliminary investigation. In each case the European Court of Human Rights has stated at the outset that the provision of rules about the admissibility of evidence is first and foremost a matter of national law and that the evaluation of the evidence is generally a matter for the national courts. Nonetheless, a number of minimum requirements can be inferred from the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights, particularly in the Kostovski and Doorson cases. These conditions are as follows:


(a) The interests of the defence must be weighed in the appropriate cases against those of the witnesses and victims summoned to give evidence; this may lead to a witness being heard anonymously; the suspect should always be given a sufficient and proper opportunity to examine the anonymous witness and challenge his testimony;


(b) The judge should satisfy himself of the identity of the witnesses and form an opinion about their reliability;


(c) A conviction may not be based solely or to a decisive extent on the testimony of anonymous witnesses.


174. In view of the above the Code of Criminal Procedure contains a strict rule governing the conditions in which an interview can be conducted anonymously. These may be summarized as follows. First of all, the witness in question must have been seriously threatened in connection with the statement to be made by him (art. 261, para. 1). This requirement is elaborated in article 261, paragraph 2:


"A serious threat within the meaning of paragraph 1 may be assumed if:
"(a) the witness may consider that a threat exists to such an extent in respect of the statement to be made by him that it is reasonable to fear for the life, health or social functioning of the witness or another person;
"(b) the witness has indicated that on account of this threat he will not otherwise make a statement; and
"(c) there is good reason to suppose that the witness will not be able to appear at the trial for that reason."
175. Second, the objections of a witness who wishes to have complete anonymity are checked by the examining magistrate. The latter should list these objections in an official report. He also states in the official report whether he considers the objections to be well founded (art. 261, para. 4).


176. Third, there is the criterion of proportionality: a witness may not be examined anonymously if the indictable offence in question is not one for which pre-trial detention is permitted (art. 261, para. 3).


177. Fourth, the examination of an anonymous witness is entrusted to the examining magistrate, who thereby provides the judicial safeguard for the collection of evidence in the preliminary investigation. In urgent cases, however, the witness may also be examined by the investigating official if it is not possible to await the examination by the examining magistrate (art. 261, para. 8). An example would be very special cases in which time is of the essence and the witness must be heard immediately (e.g. because he or she is going abroad). The safeguards which apply to an examination by the examining magistrate should then be observed as far as possible.


178. Fifth, article 161, paragraph 4, contains a number of regulations relating to the course of events during the examination. The examining magistrate ensures that the witness cannot be recognized. In principle, the suspect and his counsel may attend the examination. In exceptional cases they (and hence the public prosecutor too) are excluded from the examination and are only given the opportunity to submit written questions.


179. Finally, the anonymous witness should be sworn in by the examining magistrate (art. 261, para. 6). This rule is important in relation to article 335. Under this article, a statement made under oath to the examining magistrate by a witness who cannot appear at the trial may be deemed to have been made at the trial provided that it is read out in court.


180. To ensure that the identity of an anonymous witness is not disclosed, article 252, paragraph 2, provides for a right to refuse to give evidence. Article 251, paragraph 1 (the right to refuse to give evidence in one's official capacity), applies by analogy to judges, the members of the Public Prosecutions Service and other persons familiar with the identity of a witness who has been examined on the basis of the provisions of article 261.


181. A suspect may oppose the "deployment" of an anonymous witness at the trial. The basic premise is that it is the trial judge who ultimately decides whether the testimony of an anonymous witness will be allowed in evidence (Explanatory Memorandum, p. 114). To enable the judge to make an informed decision on this point, he is given the power in article 338, paragraph 1, to examine the witness in private. This power allows the trial judge to form an opinion independently of whether the procedural and substantive criteria of article 261 (regarding admissibility and reliability) have been fulfilled.


182. If the trial judge takes the same view as the suspect and sees no reason for the witness to remain anonymous, two courses of action are possible under paragraph 2 of article 338. First, he may direct that the witness will be heard anew by the examining magistrate, but on this occasion not anonymously. However, the public prosecutor can prevent this by withholding his consent. If it is immediately clear that the public prosecutor will not give consent or if the unreliability of the witness is of such a kind that even an examination which is not anonymous will not yield usable evidence, the second course of action becomes applicable. In such cases the court may rule that the statement of the relevant witness will not be allowed as evidence.


183. If the trial judge considers that the conditions of article 261 have been fulfilled, he maintains the anonymity of the witness. The official report then continues to be part of the documents. He may possibly decide that the witness should be examined again by the examining magistrate on the basis of the questions to which he (the trial judge) wishes to have an answer (art. 338, para. 3). Further investigation by the examining magistrate is also possible with a view to rectification of any procedural errors (art. 338, para. 4).


184. A separate provision has been made in accordance with article 261, paragraph 7, for anonymous witnesses who have been heard not by the examining magistrate but by other officials (for example the police). An investigation can be instituted on the application of the public prosecutor into whether the objections to disclosure of the identity of the witness are well founded. The judge may examine the witness for this purpose in accordance with paragraph 1 of article 338. Before hearing the witness, he gives the suspect or his counsel the opportunity to make observations (art. 339, para. 1). Following the examination the judge decides whether the witness is entitled to claim anonymity. If the decision is negative, article 339, paragraph 2, applies: the witness is not examined anonymously, provided that the public prosecutor gives consent for this. If the judge considers that the claim to anonymity is justified, he decides that the witness may be examined by the examining magistrate as an anonymous witness and can supply a list of questions which he wishes to have answered (art. 339, para. 3). The purpose of article 364, paragraph 5, is to ensure that where a trial is resumed after a stay a threatened witness continues to receive the protection he has been promised.


185. Book 5, Title IV, Part 4 (Evidence) contains the final provision governing anonymous witnesses. According to article 385, paragraph 2, the statement of an anonymous witness cannot be used as evidence unless the witness has been examined in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 4 of article 261. In addition, the statements of anonymous witnesses can be used as evidence only if they are largely corroborated by other evidence.


The injured party


186. An injured party may join as a party to criminal proceedings at first instance for a claim not exceeding 50,000 guilders. It is also necessary that the claim should not have been submitted to the civil courts and that it is of such a nature that it is suitable for decision in the criminal proceedings (art. 374, para. 1). A special feature of this arrangement is that under article 374, paragraph 2, the injured party may also join proceedings in respect of a criminal offence that is disposed of ad informandum. The joinder occurs at the trial (see art. 374, para. 2) and may not occur for the first time on appeal (art. 374, para. 4).


187. A victim may register as an injured party even during the preliminary investigation (art. 206, para. 1). As a consequence, an injured party who requires assistance and support as a result of the offence will receive the requisite counselling (art. 206, para. 4). In addition, injured parties can, under article 206, paragraph 3, arrange to be informed by the public prosecutor of his decision on whether or not to prosecute. If the case is prosecuted, the public prosecutor keeps the injured party informed of developments of importance to the latter in the further proceedings. If the case is not prosecuted, he informs the injured party of his right to complain about the non-prosecution (art. 209).


188. Even before the trial, namely from the time when the proceedings are instituted, both the injured party and his lawyer may inspect the case documents at the court registry on condition that this does not hamper the progress of the case (art. 376, para. 1). Under article 376, paragraph 4, the arrangements concerning the inspection of case documents (arts. 51-54) apply by analogy.


189. In order to support its claim, the injured party or his lawyer may submit documents (art. 377, para. 1), ask the presiding judge for leave to introduce witnesses and experts (art. 377, para. 2) and also put questions to each witness and expert, provided that they relate to the damage suffered or the amount of the damage (art. 378, para. 1). Finally, the injured party may explain (or have explained) his statement of claim after the public prosecutor has made his closing speech. This is also possible under article 379 after the public prosecutor has made a second speech in accordance with the article 353, paragraph 3. The judge rules on the claim of the injured party at the same time as giving judgement in the criminal case (art. 380, para. 1). The claim will be admissible only if the case ends in a conviction (art. 380, para. 2).



Article 14

190. The help to victims provided by the Public Prosecutions Service and the police must satisfy the following criteria:


(a) The victim must be dealt with correctly and where necessary on a personal basis;


(b) The victim should be supplied with information as quickly as possible, and this information should also be clear and relevant;


(c) The victim should be assisted in making maximum use of the right to claim compensation in the course of the criminal proceedings; this may be compensation for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage.


191. The Code sets out to emphasize the judicial and hence impartial role of the officials charged with administering justice in the various stages of the criminal proceedings.


Decision on whether or not to prosecute


192. If the public prosecutor considers on the basis of the police investigation that the suspect must be prosecuted, he takes the necessary action as quickly as possible (art. 207, para. 1). The Code codifies the expediency principle: the public prosecutor may decide not to prosecute for reasons connected with the public interest. The public prosecutor may attach conditions to such a decision and must take special account of the interests of the injured party (see art. 207, para. 2). For example, the condition may be an obligation to pay compensation or to repair what has been damaged.


193. If there are considered to be grounds for prosecution, the public prosecutor decides whether the case is suitable for extrajudicial disposal (art. 208, para. 1). The article provides a statutory basis for the power of the public prosecutor to enter into an agreement (on a voluntary basis) with the suspect for the performance of community service by the latter. In exchange, the public prosecutor agrees not to press charges. This article does not in fact exclude the possibility of another special condition being imposed on the suspect in addition to the community service, for example an obligation to indemnify the victim.



Judicial measures in cases of urgency


194. Where a criminal court convicts a suspect, it may impose a pecuniary penalty as an extra guarantee of performance of the sentence. If such a penalty is not paid, the court may, on the application of the Public Prosecutions Service, order that the offender be detained for such period as it may determine (art. 43, para. 7).


Compensation after application of pre-trial constraints


195. The compensation scheme applies to all pre-trial constraints. Article 178, paragraph 1, refers to damage suffered as a result of application of a constraint. Damage includes any injury not consisting of pecuniary damage (art. 178, para. 3).


196. Since article 178, paragraph 1, refers to compensation for a person who has suffered damage, such person may be not only the suspect (or former suspect) but also a third party. The legislator is thinking in this connection, for example, of a third party whose home has been searched, a witness who has been wrongly detained for refusing to answer questions, a victim who was originally treated as a suspect and a person whose privacy has been violated as a result of the tapping of a suspect's conversations. The arrangement is intended to be exclusive, and it therefore precludes any recourse to the civil courts (art. 182).


197. The arrangement distinguishes between damage suffered as a result of the unlawful application of a pre-trial constraint and that suffered as a result of its lawful application. In the former case there is a right to compensation and in the latter case compensation may be granted if this is reasonable and fair. Whether the application of the constraint was lawful or unlawful is assessed at the time when the constraint was applied (art. 187, para. 2).


198. Under article 178, paragraph 1, a right to compensation exists when application of a constraint was unlawful (for example because the manner of application was out of proportion to the offence in question).




Annex

NATIONAL ORDINANCE in connection with the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (National Ordinance implementing the Convention against Torture)



BILL

IN THE NAME OF THE QUEEN!

THE GOVERNOR OF ARUBA

Whereas:


it is necessary to make certain provisions under the criminal law in connection with the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment adopted in New York on 10 December 1984 (Treaty Series 1985, 69);


Has, after hearing the Advisory Council and after consultation with Parliament, adopted the following national ordinance:



Article 1

1. Where a public official or other person in the service of the authorities, acting in the course of his duties, assaults a person who has been deprived of his liberty with a view to obtaining information or a confession, punishing him, or causing him fear or coercing him into doing or permitting something or out of contempt for his claim to human dignity, such acts shall, if they are capable of achieving their intended aim, be construed as torture and carry a term of imprisonment not exceeding fifteen years.


2. Intentionally causing a state of great fear or other form of serious mental anguish shall be equated with assault.


3. If the offence results in death, the perpetrator shall be sentenced to life imprisonment or to a determinate sentence not exceeding twenty years.



Article 2

The following persons shall be liable to the same sentences as those specified for the offences referred to in the previous article:


(a) a public official who, by one of the means referred to in article 49, paragraph 1 (b), of the Criminal Code of Aruba (AB 1991 No. GT 50), incites the commission of the form of assault referred to in article 1 or intentionally permits another person to commit this form of assault;



(b) a person who commits the form of assault referred to in article 1, if a public official has, by one of the means referred to in article 49, paragraph 1 (b), of the Criminal Code of Aruba, incited in the course of his duties the commission of the offence or has intentionally permitted it.



Article 3

Articles 44 and 45 of the Criminal Code of Aruba do not apply to the offences referred to in articles 1 and 2.



Article 4

The offences made punishable in articles 1 and 2 are indictable offences.



Article 5

The criminal law of Aruba is applicable to everyone who commits one of the indictable offences described in articles 1 and 2 of this national ordinance outside Aruba.



Article 6

1. This national ordinance shall take effect on the day after that of publication of the Official Bulletin of Aruba in which the announcement is made.


2. This national ordinance may be cited as the National Ordinance implementing the Convention against Torture.


Issued at Oranjestad



The Minister of Justice







 


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Home || Treaties || Search || Links


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Magnolia on January 07, 2008, 05:22:21 PM
I think that the cover up started the night that Natalee left
Carlos and Charlies with J2K.  It started as a "sweep it under
the rug" more than a cover up.  They did not expect that
Beth and Jug and company would come in and stick around.
Paulus et al thought it would all just die down and life would
go on as usual.  They kept having to involve more and more
people due to Beth's efforts to find her child.  Paulus called
Vander Straaten and Vander Straaten involved KJ and the
ball just kept rolling until finally they could never let the
truth get out or the whole island would go down.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Dayhiker on January 07, 2008, 05:24:09 PM

Janet- Sorry about that errant post. Let's review Karin Jannsen for a moment.

1- As the Prosecutor she would make the ultimate call on not arresting the suspects for 10 days.

2- It was Karin who said she could go in like cowboys after she had done the very same thing to the black security guards.

3- She knew one of her own prosecutors staff, Ben Vocking, took a leave of absence to help his good friend Paulus van der Sloot.

4- She, not Dompig, would have made out the original search warrant the Judge Bob Wit claims was for a limited search.

5- Karin knew Koen Gottenbos needed to be questioned but did nothing about it, ultimately leading to one her staff resigning the case.

6- Jannsen stalled the investigation for two years and refused to communicate with the family or media, then ended up leaving for Holland.

7- Karin Jannsen gave the security guards' lawyer both the Kalpoes' early statements but refused to give them Joran's, saying his were "irrelevant."


In essence, this woman is just as responsible for the cover-up as anyone else.


I agree Dayhiker.

My contention ...the coverup to protect Paulus and Joran encompasses ... the Aruban Law Enforcement ... the Aruban Prosecutor ... the Aruban Justice Department ... various levels of the Aruban and Dutch governments as well as ... the judiciary.

Janet



All the key players were in place to intentionally derail the  investigation:


Jan van der Straten- Friend of Paulus van der Sloot, Police Commissioner on the case. Refused to call for the arrest of his good friend's son for 10 days.

Karin Janssen- Previous co-worker of Paulus Van der Sloot. Refused to call for the arrest of her co-worker's son for 10 days. ReRused to turn over Joran's ststements to the security guards' attorneys. Refused to communicate with the family.

Ben Vocking- Very close friend of Paulus van der Sloot and employed by the Prosecutor. Took a leave of absence right after Natalee went missing to help out his friend, was at the VDS home with Judge Wit when the search was limited on the spot.

Judge Bob Wit- Previous co-worker of Paulus Van der Sloot, a personal friend. Limited the full search warrant request on the spot to include only Joran's apartment.

Judge Rick Smid- Previous co-worker of Paulus Van der Sloot, a personal friend. Released all three of the main suspects unconditionally in 9/2005 in spite of their radically conflicting testimony. Released all three again in 12/2007.

Rudy Croes- Prime Minister, former employer of Paulus van der Sloot, personal friend. Kept the FBI from becoming involved in the case, prohgibited Karin Jannsen from communicating with the victim's family.


All of these Dutch officials and more were involved in the cover-up? Where is Hans Mos?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Buckeye on January 07, 2008, 05:40:10 PM
I wish we could find out who the two instructors/employees were on the boat.

Klaas where are you

Mum we do have that info somewhere. Klaas maybe able to find it in her archives. I know the captain goes by the name of Jethro. If I remember Klaas has the real name of him. She also knows the name of the boat. I have always found it odd that the boat left Aruba for somewhere in the Netherlands for a vacation that was planned the day after Natalee disappeared. Meaning Monday morning.

I don't know if I actually remember Natalee having been on this boat.  But, I believe the boat name is Calypso with captain Jethro Gesterkamp.  On a side note, igsigs feels MF is Annalisa Klein Gesterkamp  :shock:.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: private eye on January 07, 2008, 05:41:40 PM

I think Karen Jansen might need to review this. She refused to speak with Beth and as far as I know never shared the case files with eith Beth or Dave
The injured party


186. An injured party may join as a party to criminal proceedings at first instance for a claim not exceeding 50,000 guilders. It is also necessary that the claim should not have been submitted to the civil courts and that it is of such a nature that it is suitable for decision in the criminal proceedings (art. 374, para. 1). A special feature of this arrangement is that under article 374, paragraph 2, the injured party may also join proceedings in respect of a criminal offence that is disposed of ad informandum. The joinder occurs at the trial (see art. 374, para. 2) and may not occur for the first time on appeal (art. 374, para. 4).


187. A victim may register as an injured party even during the preliminary investigation (art. 206, para. 1). As a consequence, an injured party who requires assistance and support as a result of the offence will receive the requisite counselling (art. 206, para. 4). In addition, injured parties can, under article 206, paragraph 3, arrange to be informed by the public prosecutor of his decision on whether or not to prosecute. If the case is prosecuted, the public prosecutor keeps the injured party informed of developments of importance to the latter in the further proceedings. If the case is not prosecuted, he informs the injured party of his right to complain about the non-prosecution (art. 209).


188. Even before the trial, namely from the time when the proceedings are instituted, both the injured party and his lawyer may inspect the case documents at the court registry on condition that this does not hamper the progress of the case (art. 376, para. 1). Under article 376, paragraph 4, the arrangements concerning the inspection of case documents (arts. 51-54) apply by analogy.


189. In order to support its claim, the injured party or his lawyer may submit documents (art. 377, para. 1), ask the presiding judge for leave to introduce witnesses and experts (art. 377, para. 2) and also put questions to each witness and expert, provided that they relate to the damage suffered or the amount of the damage (art. 378, para. 1). Finally, the injured party may explain (or have explained) his statement of claim after the public prosecutor has made his closing speech. This is also possible under article 379 after the public prosecutor has made a second speech in accordance with the article 353, paragraph 3. The judge rules on the claim of the injured party at the same time as giving judgement in the criminal case (art. 380, para. 1). The claim will be admissible only if the case ends in a conviction (art. 380, para. 2).



Article 14

190. The help to victims provided by the Public Prosecutions Service and the police must satisfy the following criteria:


(a) The victim must be dealt with correctly and where necessary on a personal basis;


(b) The victim should be supplied with information as quickly as possible, and this information should also be clear and relevant;


(c) The victim should be assisted in making maximum use of the right to claim compensation in the course of the criminal proceedings; this may be compensation for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: jackb on January 07, 2008, 06:32:34 PM

PI ... considering what Hans Mos has put the parents of Natalee through in the past month ... I am not about to give this guy the benefit of the doubt at this point.

If Hans Mos has a master plan ... he certainly has a cruel way of going about it.  In November, 2007 ... Dave and Beth climbed aboard that emotional roller coaster once again ... hoping against all hope that maybe ... just maybe ... Aruba was going to come through ... hoping that justice for Natalee was finally going to prevail.  Less than one month later ...

PI ... we both have differing perspectives regarding this topic and ... that is OK. I will gladly eat crow if I am wrong.  :lol:

Janet


Yep yep yep. Remember how we gave Prosecutor Karin Janssen a free ticket for almost two years until we started finding out the real dirt on her. All she was doing was stalling for time, then she flees the country to safety in Holland like all guilty parties do.

Hans Mos is deja vu all over again.


Personally I do not think Hans Mos has put anyone through anything.  He had less than nothing to work with considering some of them are involved in the coverup and never went out of their way to assist him.  No telling what he has been told.  Hans Mos seems like an honorable man.      Jack Blue


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: private eye on January 07, 2008, 07:03:06 PM
I don't know why with the strategy that I think he used he didn't prevent the boys from having access to their attorney's and why he didn't with hold all information until he had interrogated them. Once the attorneys were apprised of the evidence, then the attorneys talked and the boys knew to just not talk that they had nothing. That is allowed according to the summary I posted.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 07, 2008, 07:12:50 PM
Deepak's June 29, 2005 Statement:

From BFN

PROCES-VERBAAL

We, Clyde Anthony BURKE and Marton Rolando GUMBS, respectively sergeant first class and head police-officer with the Korps Politie Aruba, first mentioned is part of detective unit district 2 and the latter with the Detective Cooperation Team, declare the following.

On Wednesday, June 29th 2005 at about 12.40 hours we, the reporting officers, interviewed the suspect Deepak.S. KALPOE, for further information.

Before the interview/interrogation started the suspect was informed that he was not obliged to answer the questions.

His interview went as follows;

"Although I am aware I am not obliged to answer your questions, I am willing to make a statement.

"On your question how much money I make with my job, I can say the following. I am not going to answer that question. I am of the opinion that my wage has nothing to do with this case. I am not going to answer questions about how much I make. I am angry. I have already agreed with my lawyer that I would no longer make any statements. I know I am innocent.

On the question what my lawyer had told me regarding not making statements, I can say the following. He had told me that I should just say the truth.

On your question whether or not I have a job, I can say the following. Yes, I have a job.

On your question where I work, I can say the following. I work at the Cyber Zone Internet café.

On your question whether I have a savings-account, I can say the following. I am not going to answer this question.

On your question with what bank I have a savings-account, I can say the following. I am also not going to give an answer to this question.

On your question if I have another source of income, I can say the following. I do not have another source of income.

On your question what my expenses are, I can say the following. I am not going to answer this question.

On your questions whether I was present at Joran's apartment when Joran told the story to Freddy, I can say the following. Yes, I was at the apartment that day. It was on the 31st of May in the evening hours.

On your question which of the stories Joran had told Freddy, I can say the following. I am not answering that question, because I already made a declaration/statement regarding this.

I am not going to declare anything until the office of the DA is going to end my restrictions, then I will cooperate and make a statement.

On your question if I can explain which route I had driven, on the night from May 30th 2005 to May 31st 2005, when were were called by Joran's father, I can say the following. I am not sure but I think I took the Juancho IRAUSQUIN Boulevard that runs in front of the big hotel, about where Tango's is I turned right on the road that runs in front of Mc Donalds till you get to the lights. Here I crossed the intersection into the road that leads through Palm Beach till I got to the lights at about where the police-station is in Noord. Here I turned right into the road Shaba-Tanki Flip till I got to the Femiins Bar, there I turned left onto the road leading through Montana till we got to Joran's house.

On your question whether I heard Natalee say in the car that her mother was Hitler's sister, that they owned a plantation and that they had black people as employees. I had only heard the word Hitler. The rest I did not hear. Joran told me later all the things the girl had said.

On your question if I called Joran in the night of May 30th, I can say the following. I am not going to answer this question, because I have already made a statement about this in another declaration.

On your question what Joran told me about his sport-shoes, I can say the following. Joran had told me that he left them on the beach.

On your question whether I thought it strange that Joran had left his sport-shoes on the beach, I can say the following. I did find it strange, but they were his shoes so not my problem.

On you question if I know the make of his shoes, I can say the following. I don't know the make. The only thing I know is that they were white sport-shoes.

On your question for whom I bought sport-shoes that I presumably bought at "The Athlete's Foot" , I can say the following. I did not buy sport-shoes. I had to buy these before the case of the missing girl come up. I would also like to know since when it is a crime to buy sport-shoes.

You are telling me that John Charles CROES has stated that I wrote while I was chatting with him that I had written that the girl had put her hands in/down my pants, I can say the following. I did this to frustrate/mess up the investigation. I wanted to direct the focus of the police on myself and Joran because we were afraid that Satish would get the details wrong with regard to the "Holiday Inn" story. I was almost certain that our telephone conversations were being taped and I was certain that my computer was being monitored too.

On your question what made me think that the police would be monitoring our phones, I can say the following. I thought this might happen earlier and Joran had said the same thing to me on Tuesday May 31st 2005*. The purpose of the chat traffic was to help the police and the Office of the DA with regard to the investigation so that they could see that I was indeed home in the night from Sunday to Monday. But I have understood that they do not have the chat traffic from that night but that they do have the one from Tuesday. I know the technical procedure, so if they have the one from Tuesday than they should be looking for the one from Sunday to Monday. If I had anything to hide than I would have never told the police about John Charles CROES. Because that just worsened the situation. Even though this never happened, about the girl putting her hands in/down my pants, I would like to know what kind of crime this is. I am again saying this never happened, but it is just my question to the district attorney.

You are saying to me that I don't want to say untrue things about Joran, but that I did help Joran come up with the story about the "Holiday Inn" like the guards issue and that Joran has been telling untrue things about me and my brother Satish and what I can say about that. The story about the "Holiday Inn" was before he started making up stories against me and my brother. I am only stating the truth.

On your question about what Joran told me after he left the girl on the beach, I can say the following. Joran told me that he had left the girl "passed out" on the beach.

On your question about what I understood "passed out" meant, I can say the following. I understood that the girl had fallen asleep. I did not ask him what he meant by "passed out". He had further told me that after this he walked home on his bare feet.

On your question if I could describe the clothes that Joran was wearing on May 29th 2005, I can say the following. I have already made a statement about what he wore.

On you question if I could seriously think and remember what clothes he wore, I can say the following. I cannot do this. They are the same clothes of which I spoke in my earlier statement.

***Note from translator:

* this part of the conversation I translated as literally as possible but as this is dutch, it is not always possible to view it completely literal. In English most likely this sentence would be written as:

I already thought earlier that Tuesday that our phone-calls would be getting monitored, even before Joran said that same thing to me on Tuesday May 31st 2005.

if one looks at the dutch and is not proficient in the language one might think that Deepak had already taken this possibility into consideration before it happened.***


On your question whether or not I would lend my car out to someone else, I can say the following. I myself and my brother are the only ones who drive my car..

On your question whether or not I can remember at what time we stopped playing at the "Raddison Hotel". I think that it was about 02.15, but I am not sure but this you will be able to determine with the help of the surveillance tape of the casino.

On your question at what time we arrived at the "Wyndham Hotel", I can say the following. I estimate that we arrived there about 02.20 hours..

On your question what Joran's mom meant by telling us that we should stay away from the "Marriot Hotel", I can say the following. With this she meant that the police was monitoring that area and that we were already in trouble. So avoid the area and that it was best to head home.

You are telling me that during my chat session with John Charles Croes I told him that I was trying to get in contact via the telephone with a friend of mine and what I meant by this. I meant Joran. I could not call him because I didn't have any more phone-minutes left and it is not possible to call a mobile phone from our home-phone. After this I received an SMS from Joran which said "Hey Swa I am home already, thanks for waiting".

On the question what Joran meant with the remark "thanks for waiting", I can say the following. With this he meant that he wanted to thank me for waiting online.

On your question whether me and Joran had agreed that I would wait until he was home, I can say the following. It was agreed that I would wait until he came online.

D.S.KALPOEAfter the suspect D.S. KALPOE had read his statement he stated that he would not sign it. He refused because he had reviewed his previous statements in the presence of his lawyer before signing it and that this hadn't happened with this interview/proces-verbaal.

Of this, we the reporting officers, on our oath as officers have written this proces-verbaal, closed and signed in Oranjestad on June 29th 2005.

The reporting officers.

Burke      Gumbs


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 07, 2008, 07:46:38 PM
I don't know why with the strategy that I think he used he didn't prevent the boys from having access to their attorney's and why he didn't with hold all information until he had interrogated them. Once the attorneys were apprised of the evidence, then the attorneys talked and the boys knew to just not talk that they had nothing. That is allowed according to the summary I posted.

I agree.

Considering Anita's words ... I have suspicions that the suspects were forewarned by their families prior to the apprehensions.  Why would the Kalpoe and VDS families be questioned ... none of the suspects are minors?

Janet

+++++++

Re-Arrests Bring Holloway Family "Hope"
ORANJESTAD, Aruba, Nov. 22, 2007
By Margaret Wever
The Associated Press


"What they want to do with Joran is to bring him to Aruba for a final reconstruction," Anita van der Sloot said by telephone from the family's home in Aruba.

She said her family and that of the Kalpoe brothers also had been questioned in recent weeks

"The questions they asked were so obvious, things like, 'Why did Joran leave his shoes on the beach,'" she said, referring to the place where her son said he kissed Holloway alone before her disappearance. "I think it's ridiculous after two-and-a-half years to be doing this."
 
http://www.montgomeryadvertiser.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071122/NEWS/711220327/1001



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Magnolia on January 07, 2008, 11:17:58 PM
Hat always had a way of seeing the obvious.
I found this old post about the security guards.



   RBN#35 06/29/05 Wed-Thursday Overnight.
« Reply #678 on: June 30, 2005, 02:21:01 AM » 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote from: "Hat"
So I think their justice system grew to protect against a quick acceptance of an obvious answer. I think that's why it is secretive. They are a reasonable society and seek justice.

I fear something else, the quality that led the authorities to fall so hard for Joran's story and seize the scapegoated innocents. Is that classcism and racism? Those several days and the lost chance for evidence, if that is true may have cost the elites dearly.
============================================================

Then from TtownMike:

Re scapegoats:  Good thang them folks didn't have a rope!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 07, 2008, 11:38:19 PM
Magnolia - yes, Hat was on top of it from the very beginning.

Sure wish we'd get some news from the search!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Magnolia on January 07, 2008, 11:41:16 PM
Magnolia - yes, Hat was on top of it from the very beginning.

Sure wish we'd get some news from the search!

That picture of the Persistence next to the huge Cruise Ship
reminds me of  The Little Engine That Could


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 07, 2008, 11:42:57 PM
Klaas
Do we have that cartoon somewhere for easy access?  TIA


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 07, 2008, 11:49:04 PM
Klaas
Do we have that cartoon somewhere for easy access?  TIA

http://cartoons.diberardo.com/recent-political-cartoon/girl-murdered.php

(http://cartoons.diberardo.com/canadian-political-cartoons/political-cartoons-large/death-in-paradise.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 07, 2008, 11:50:18 PM
I think I can, but I don't feel like uploading to photobucket.. :2doh:

http://www.thelittleenginethatcouldtour.com/

Just checking in before going to sleep....night, all.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 07, 2008, 11:51:44 PM
Lala's I gave it it's own thread too:

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2507.0


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Magnolia on January 07, 2008, 11:52:23 PM
Thank you 2NJ.
It is inspirational...I think.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 07, 2008, 11:52:27 PM
 :lol: :lol: OH, the cartoon by Diberardo....

I was stuck on The Little Engine That Could...

CYA..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 07, 2008, 11:53:01 PM
I think I can, but I don't feel like uploading to photobucket.. :2doh:

http://www.thelittleenginethatcouldtour.com/

Just checking in before going to sleep....night, all.

Thanks 2NJ

(http://www.thelittleenginethatcouldtour.com/images/book_cover.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 07, 2008, 11:53:34 PM
Thank you 2NJ.
It is inspirational...I think.

It's a classic, Magnolia.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: texasmom on January 07, 2008, 11:57:25 PM
nite 2NJ!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: texasmom on January 08, 2008, 12:01:17 AM
I think I can, but I don't feel like uploading to photobucket.. :2doh:

http://www.thelittleenginethatcouldtour.com/

Just checking in before going to sleep....night, all.

Thanks 2NJ

(http://www.thelittleenginethatcouldtour.com/images/book_cover.jpg)

Klaas, you need to put the little engine pic beside the shot of the Persistence/Cruise ship pic and post it for Kyle and Crew when you have time.  I think they would love it.  I'd do it if I could...but you're so much better at those things. TIA


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 08, 2008, 12:04:08 AM
(http://www.nationalenquirer.com/images/ne/208629/50773.jpg)

EXCLUSIVE! NATALEE MOM'S HORROR
By DAVID WRIGHT

Natalee Holloway's mother confronted her daughter's suspected killer, Joran van der Sloot, just minutes after he is believed to have dumped the honor student's body at sea.

And when a frantic Beth Twitty begged a policeman to search the trunk of his pal Deepak Kalpoe's car, the cop refused — passing up an opportunity to detect clues that could have cracked the case right then and there.

Detectives in Aruba, where Natalee vanished on May 30, have been investigating this explosive new theory.

The line of inquiry was fueled by yet another lie told by 18-year-old Joran, the prime suspect in the case, The National Enquirer has discovered.

On September 1, a judge ordered Joran to be released from jail after being held for questioning since June 9. He still remains a suspect.

Beth Twitty's drama began when she and her husband Jug flew to Aruba after learning that Natalee, 18, had failed to make the flight home with the rest of her graduating class from Mountain Brook High School, Ala.

By the early hours of May 31, Beth had convinced a reluctant cop to help. He went with her to the Holiday Inn where Natalee and her classmates had stayed. There, they met a young man who brought up the names of Joran and Deepak and Satish Kalpoe — all later arrested on suspicion of rape and murder.

Retired U.S. Secret Service agent Arthur Wood, who has been working with Aruban investigators, said: "The kid agreed to lead the Twittys and the officer to Joran's house. They got there around 3 am on May 31.

"Joran's father Paulus came out and the policeman told him that the Americans were searching for their missing daughter, who'd last been seen leaving a nightclub with Joran around 1 am the previous morning.

"Paulus said he'd get Joran. Then he came back and said, 'He's not here.' He called Joran's cell phone and after speaking to him said, 'He says he's at the Wyndham hotel playing poker.'

"They all headed for the Wyndham. But there was no sign of Joran in the casino. Since then I've questioned just about everyone at the hotel, and there is no indication Joran was ever there on the 31st.

"Paulus called Joran again, then told everyone, 'He's home now.' It was 4 am. The group went back to the house and found Joran and Deepak at the gate next to Deepak's Honda — the car in which Beth knew Natalee had left the nightclub the night before.

"Beth demanded: 'Where's my daughter?' Joran replied in a surly voice: 'I dropped her at the Holiday Inn. What do you want me to do?'

"Beth then begged the boys to open the trunk of the car and let the policeman search it. Deepak didn't respond — and the policeman wouldn't make him do it. We'll never know what clues police might have found inside the car or the trunk because the Honda wasn't seized for several days.

"The belief is growing that Joran and Deepak may have just been coming back from getting rid of Natalee's body when Beth arrived at the house the second time.

"The theory is that they didn't have time to do it on the 30th — they needed someone with a boat, and it took them a day to arrange it. When Beth was at Joran's house the first time and was told he wasn't there, he may well have been disposing of her daughter's body just a few miles away."

The latest police theory also accounts for a fisherman's hut being broken into on the beach near where the three suspects say they last saw Natalee. The only items missing were a knife and some rope.

Later the same day, another fisherman reported that one of his large wire mesh fish traps had been stolen — leading investigators to believe that it may have been weighted down and used as a "casket" for Natalee's body.

Said Wood: "It would have been very easy to hide her body in the dunes for 24 hours. And until Natalee's mom arrived in Aruba, no one was looking for her."


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Published on: 09/09/2005

http://www.nationalenquirer.com/crime/63323#


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 08, 2008, 12:06:22 AM
For Kyle and the Persistence crew:

(http://bp0.blogger.com/_d8XtKIwObt4/R4Eqx-DWjQI/AAAAAAAAALM/NIx6Sa7vre8/s400/Persistence_cruiseship_aAruba.JPG)

(http://www.thelittleenginethatcouldtour.com/images/book_cover.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 08, 2008, 12:16:29 AM
Another old forum thread regarding the case.  Might be interresting to go through it now and see if there's anything interresting. 

http://www.comebackalive.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=10351&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0

I'll be back in a bit, bath time.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 08, 2008, 12:19:10 AM
I think I can, but I don't feel like uploading to photobucket.. :2doh:

http://www.thelittleenginethatcouldtour.com/

Just checking in before going to sleep....night, all.

Thanks 2NJ

(http://www.thelittleenginethatcouldtour.com/images/book_cover.jpg)

WOW!!!  Thank you 2NJ.  I just took a trip down memory lane.

Shhh ... don't tell the other Monkeys but ... I was born in December 1946 and ... between the ages of one and five ... The Little Engine was read daily.  The same book was also a mainstead with my two younger brothers.  My youngest brother somehow ended up with it in his box of childhood memories.

I THINK I CAN ... I THINK I CAN ... I THINK I CAN.

Janet

++++++++++


http://tigger.uic.edu/~plotnick/littleng.htm

The Little Engine that Could - 1930

By far the most familiar telling of the tale of the Little Engine first appeared in 1930. Published by Platt & Munk, it was "retold" by Watty Piper and illustrated by Lois Lenski. Watty Piper never existed; it is a "house" pseudonym for Platt & Munk and was used on numerous other children's books


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: texasmom on January 08, 2008, 12:22:15 AM
Thanks Klaas for the pics and NE story...  I'd read it then, but hardly ever pick one up anymore.  I think they've had some stories recently so I may have to check them out again, I saw a partial story while surfing the other night that looked interesting.  I know some who laugh at the thought but a lot of times they are correct....remember those "ugly a.. shoes" from the OJ Simpson trial....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 08, 2008, 12:22:26 AM
Lala's I gave it it's own thread too:

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2507.0

Thanks.  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 08, 2008, 12:30:41 AM
From CNN
Search for Alabama girl continues in Aruba


ORANJESTAD, Aruba (CNN) -- A reward for information about an 18-year-old
Alabama girl who vanished a week ago on the paradise island of Aruba reached
$55,000 Monday as investigators kept up the search they began last week.
Police detained two security guards Sunday with crimes related to the
disappearance of Natalee Holloway, but Aruba chief prosecutor Karen Janssen
declined to specify the charges to reporters.
The men will be held for at least two days, Janssen said.
An FBI spokesman in Miami said that earlier reports that bureau divers
would actively join the search Monday were in error, as was a report that
bureau agents assisted in the arrests. The spokesman said seven FBI agents from
the Miami office are in Aruba, including two divers and some evidence
collection and analysis experts, and one agent is there from the Barbados
office.
Police Chief Jan van Strantan (prono: yan vahn STRAHN-tun) said police
and the FBI determined that bloodstains on a mattress found Sunday just east of
where the men were arrested were not from Holloway but from a dog.
He added that none of the student's possessions had been found in the
men's three cars or other possessions police seized Sunday.

Van Strantan said the security guards work at Hotel Allegro, located in
Oranjestad near the Holiday Inn where Holloway was staying.
Police spent much of Saturday at the Allegro, but refused to say whether
they had found anything of evidentiary value.
Police arrested the two men at their homes in the southwestern Aruba town
of San Nicolas at about 7 a.m., police said. A tip led police to the men, who
were under "interrogation," and others may be arrested, Janssen said.
The security guards were not among three men who were with Holloway when
she was last reported seen early Monday morning.
Police said Sunday Holloway was still considered missing, although they
have not ruled out the possibility of kidnapping or other foul play.
Holloway, from the Birmingham suburb of Mountain Brook, was last reported
seen as she left the nightclub Carlos'N Charlie's in Oranjestad. Witnesses said
she left the club at 1:30 a.m. in a car with three young men from the area.
Friends said they have pictures of her dancing with the men at the club.

Authorities said the three men told police they took Holloway to a nearby
beach before returning her to her hotel at about 2 a.m. Monday.
The straight-A student was in Aruba with about 100 other Mountain Brook
High School classmates and parent chaperones to celebrate their graduation.
Holloway, a member of the National Honor Society, had won an academic
scholarship to the University of Alabama.
A $55,000 reward has been offered for any information leading to her
whereabouts.
The money was donated from the Aruban Tourist Board, the family, the
Aruban government and an anonymous donor.

http://www.comebackalive.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=10351&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=15


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 08, 2008, 12:35:26 AM
media
BFCus Regularus


Joined: 30 Mar 2004
Posts: 1999
Location: South East US
 Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2005 8:17 pm    Post subject:   

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
UPDATE:
Two hotel security guards held in connection with the disappearance of Natalee Holloway are accused of
homicide, being accomplices to homicide and kidnapping leading to homicide, their attorney said Tuesday. Their lawyer Chris Lejuez is the first person to say prosecutors are looking at his clients as possible murder suspects in the disappearance of
Natalee Holloway. This will be out in the media shortly..
 
 http://www.comebackalive.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=10351&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=30


Again - why homicide?  what did they know?   


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 08, 2008, 12:41:45 AM
Alessandro
BFCus Regularus


Joined: 25 Mar 2004
Posts: 1372
Location: European Union
 Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2005 1:31 pm    Post subject:   

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Stay away from the tourist ghettos, it attract all kind of low-lives.
Aruba is a major drug trafficking area, something the travel agency
"forgot" to mention...


 http://www.comebackalive.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=10351&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=75


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 08, 2008, 12:45:54 AM
media
BFCus Regularus


Joined: 30 Mar 2004
Posts: 1999
Location: South East US
 Posted: Sat Jun 18, 2005 3:15 pm    Post subject:   

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
This is only one theory...(not 100% mine)
far fetched ??

The presence of numerous unregulated and unrestricted "gypsy boats" sailing in and out of Aruba and Curacao’s ports to market produce and "other commodities" from the South American mainland [some 19 miles to Colombia and 35 miles to Venezuela] provides the means to abduct women--even as high-speed Colombian cigarette boat drug-runners also ply Caribbean island waters and seaports heavily frequented by American families.

"Venezuela, on a good day from Curacao or Aruba, is in sight. We have been told by investigators, there are boats incoming. They come and go freely...there is a tremendous drug trade...

Night-time beacon for drug and sex-trafficking boats?

Late at night, Aruba’s California lighthouse (where suspects claim they took Holloway) could easily serve as a beacon to guide boats to the deserted beach to quickly drop off and pick up narcotics-- submissive females, possibly drugged by bartenders or other patrons at a popular club like Carlos and Charlie’s could be victims of sexual transport.

"Spotters," paid to watch for attractive women on vacation as potential sex slaves could guide them into a bar to be drugged and then out into a waiting car and boat for transportation to mainland or island bordellos.

Worldwide news reports say bartenders from Cancun to Aruba to Jamaica regularly spike the drinks of unsuspecting women with drugs such as Rohypnol (roofies) and GHB (liquid ecstasy) for the purpose of "date-rape," but reports also describe the increasing use of these drugs to place women in a submissive state to move them into position for transport to Caribbean island and South American brothels for indefinite periods for use as drugged prostitutes in known white slavery rings
 
http://www.comebackalive.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=10351&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=90


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 08, 2008, 12:48:11 AM
mach1
Postus Allthefuckingtimeus


Joined: 30 Mar 2004
Posts: 3152

 Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2005 10:43 pm    Post subject:   

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
I had this very strangely vividly lucid dream last Thursday. I saw underwater sub scuba divers with welding torches sealing something shut. It was really wierd because Id never had such a vivid dream before. Whats the connection in my mind to Aruba?
I dont know either. But it was outstanding in my mind at the
time so that was quite strange.

http://www.comebackalive.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=10351&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=90
 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 08, 2008, 12:55:52 AM
I wish we had a better translator..Most of these translations I have no clue what most of the article says :(

in caso of natalee holloway. is investigando potretnan saca of fondo of sea submitted


by admin on sun, 23/04/2006 - 13:41. o’stad – this is the ultimo desaroyo awo in the caso of investigacion of the young student mericano natalee holloway, that owing to desaparece for of year happen 30 of half. in end of week ultimo, guardacosta of antiyas y aruba, for motibonan cu not owing to wordo menciona owing to cuminsa one buskeda in sea y owing to saca potret of fondo of sea. niether owing to being menciona the area specifico where cu owing to wordo busca. mature is cu this owing to sosode one day after cu one sospechoso new geoffrey van cromvoit owing to stay deteni diadomingo of pasco big. the sospechoso here his detencion owing to stay prolonga cu ochi day. in ultimo dianan had rumor is circulando cu one piscador will owing to see one canaster cu algo odd in dje. y of susto past owing to tire bek in water. come across
------------------------------------------------------

Den caso di Natalee Holloway. Ta investigando potretnan saca di fondo di laman
Submitted by admin on Sun, 23/04/2006 - 13:41.

O’STAD – Esaki ta e ultimo desaroyo awo den e caso di investigacion di e hoben studiante mericano Natalee Holloway, kende a desaparece for di aña pasa 30 di mei.

Den fin di siman ultimo, Guardacosta di Antiyas y Aruba, pa motibonan cu no a wordo menciona a cuminsa un buskeda den laman y a saca potret di fondo di laman.

Tampoco a ser menciona e area specifico unda cu a wordo busca.

Hecho ta cu esaki a sosode un dia despues cu un sospechoso nobo Geoffrey van Cromvoit a keda deteni diadomingo di Pasco Grandi.

E sospechoso aki su detencion a keda prolonga cu ochi dia.

Den ultimo dianan tabatin rumor ta circulando cu un piscador lo a mira un canaster cu algo straño den dje. Y di susto el a tire bek den awa.

http://laprensacur.com/content/taxonomy/term/10?from=1810


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Bearlyhere on January 08, 2008, 01:09:53 AM
Good morning.  I have been trying for 3 days to catch up but have been having a heck of a time.

BH


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Magnolia on January 08, 2008, 01:15:20 AM
I wish we had a better translator..Most of these translations I have no clue what most of the article says :(

in caso of natalee holloway. is investigando potretnan saca of fondo of sea submitted


by admin on sun, 23/04/2006 - 13:41. o’stad – this is the ultimo desaroyo awo in the caso of investigacion of the young student mericano natalee holloway, that owing to desaparece for of year happen 30 of half. in end of week ultimo, guardacosta of antiyas y aruba, for motibonan cu not owing to wordo menciona owing to cuminsa one buskeda in sea y owing to saca potret of fondo of sea. niether owing to being menciona the area specifico where cu owing to wordo busca. mature is cu this owing to sosode one day after cu one sospechoso new geoffrey van cromvoit owing to stay deteni diadomingo of pasco big. the sospechoso here his detencion owing to stay prolonga cu ochi day. in ultimo dianan had rumor is circulando cu one piscador will owing to see one canaster cu algo odd in dje. y of susto past owing to tire bek in water. come across
------------------------------------------------------

Den caso di Natalee Holloway. Ta investigando potretnan saca di fondo di laman
Submitted by admin on Sun, 23/04/2006 - 13:41.

O’STAD – Esaki ta e ultimo desaroyo awo den e caso di investigacion di e hoben studiante mericano Natalee Holloway, kende a desaparece for di aña pasa 30 di mei.

Den fin di siman ultimo, Guardacosta di Antiyas y Aruba, pa motibonan cu no a wordo menciona a cuminsa un buskeda den laman y a saca potret di fondo di laman.

Tampoco a ser menciona e area specifico unda cu a wordo busca.

Hecho ta cu esaki a sosode un dia despues cu un sospechoso nobo Geoffrey van Cromvoit a keda deteni diadomingo di Pasco Grandi.

E sospechoso aki su detencion a keda prolonga cu ochi dia.

Den ultimo dianan tabatin rumor ta circulando cu un piscador lo a mira un canaster cu algo straño den dje. Y di susto el a tire bek den awa.

http://laprensacur.com/content/taxonomy/term/10?from=1810

******* here it is through the Portuguese translator.  It is a little clearer.

by admin on sun, 23/04/2006 - 13:41. o'stad - this is the I finish desaroyo awo in the in case that of investigacion of the mericano young student natalee holloway, that owing disappears you is of to year happen 30 of half. in end of week I finish, guardacosta of antiyas y aruba, will be motibonan cu not owing wordo mentions owing to you you cuminsa one buskeda in sea y owing you the bag potret of bottom of sea. to niether owing being mentions the to you area specifico where cu owing you wordo searchs mature is cu this owing you sosode one day to after cu one sospechoso new geoffrey van cromvoit owing you stay deteni diadomingo of pasco big. the sospechoso here his detencion owing you stay draws out cu ochi day. in I finish dianan had piscador rumor is circulating cu one will owing you see one to canaster cu something odd in dje. y of scare past owing you takes off bek in water. eats across


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 08, 2008, 01:16:28 AM
rudy croes owing to cuminza boycott relations with the netherlands

(http://img113.imageshack.us/img113/6928/boycottur4.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 08, 2008, 01:20:32 AM
Thanks Magnolia!

I am curious why they mention water and sea twice. Looks like they are talking abour rumors of GVC and a ocean disposal of Natalee. I think  :-? If those rumors are true then that VCB shirt and the location it was found may be very important.

will be motibonan cu not owing wordo mentions owing to you you cuminsa one buskeda in sea y owing you the bag potret of bottom of sea.

in I finish dianan had piscador rumor is circulating cu one will owing you see one to canaster cu something odd in dje. y of scare past owing you takes off bek in water.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 08, 2008, 01:33:09 AM
Thanks Magnolia!

I am curious why they mention water and sea twice. Looks like they are talking abour rumors of GVC and a ocean disposal of Natalee. I think  :-? If those rumors are true then that VCB shirt and the location it was found may be very important.

will be motibonan cu not owing wordo mentions owing to you you cuminsa one buskeda in sea y owing you the bag potret of bottom of sea.

in I finish dianan had piscador rumor is circulating cu one will owing you see one to canaster cu something odd in dje. y of scare past owing you takes off bek in water.

I think the GVC is mentioning that he was detained.  The water part is probably from Dompig.  Remember he was going to search the water around that time.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Magnolia on January 08, 2008, 01:33:48 AM
Thanks Magnolia!

I am curious why they mention water and sea twice. Looks like they are talking abour rumors of GVC and a ocean disposal of Natalee. I think  :-? If those rumors are true then that VCB shirt and the location it was found may be very important.

will be motibonan cu not owing wordo mentions owing to you you cuminsa one buskeda in sea y owing you the bag potret of bottom of sea.

in I finish dianan had piscador rumor is circulating cu one will owing you see one to canaster cu something odd in dje. y of scare past owing you takes off bek in water.

I think it says that there is a rumor going round that she was put in
the ocean in a container or canister and involvement of GVC,
Sonething about the Coast Gurard as well,


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: texasmom on January 08, 2008, 01:38:47 AM
Klaas,
Re: the "homicide" reports when the two security guards were being held, I at first thought as you did "What did they know" but the more I study the case and think about it I have to wonder "What did they want us to believe", so we wouldn't investigate what actually happened any further and so many of their secrets would stay hidden.  JMO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 08, 2008, 01:48:17 AM
1/8/08

Rudy Croes threatens to Boycott relations with the Holland for the 10th time and they blame the National Geographic article on Natalee. Another typical day in Aruba  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: texasmom on January 08, 2008, 01:50:16 AM
I hope I don't offend any of my monkey friends here but this thought crosses my mind every time I see a picture of Rudy Croes........Planet of the Apes...o.k.  I said it and I won't repeat it, please don't be mad at me. :2doh:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 08, 2008, 01:54:12 AM
Klaas,
Re: the "homicide" reports when the two security guards were being held, I at first thought as you did "What did they know" but the more I study the case and think about it I have to wonder "What did they want us to believe", so we wouldn't investigate what actually happened any further and so many of their secrets would stay hidden.  JMO

Good point Texasmom. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: hotping on January 08, 2008, 01:56:39 AM
I hope I don't offend any of my monkey friends here but this thought crosses my mind every time I see a picture of Rudy Croes........Planet of the Apes...o.k.  I said it and I won't repeat it, please don't be mad at me. :2doh:
Very Funny TM....LOL!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: yapperz1 on January 08, 2008, 01:57:07 AM
I hope I don't offend any of my monkey friends here but this thought crosses my mind every time I see a picture of Rudy Croes........Planet of the Apes...o.k.  I said it and I won't repeat it, please don't be mad at me. :2doh:

I couldn't agree with you more.

Yeah Aruba & its ilk went to great lengths to try to make us believe crap about anything/anyone except thos we know were involved. WHY?????
What involvement does renho, scubajap & others have in this mess?
I feel it is more than earning their keep. MOO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: texasmom on January 08, 2008, 02:01:45 AM
mach1
Postus Allthefuckingtimeus


Joined: 30 Mar 2004
Posts: 3152

 Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2005 10:43 pm    Post subject:   

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
I had this very strangely vividly lucid dream last Thursday. I saw underwater sub scuba divers with welding torches sealing something shut. It was really wierd because Id never had such a vivid dream before. Whats the connection in my mind to Aruba?
I dont know either. But it was outstanding in my mind at the
time so that was quite strange.

http://www.comebackalive.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=10351&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=90
 

Two things come to mind after reading this, first the article the tourist wrote regarding the Renaissance Island boat that was sunk that was in shallow water; they also mentioned a WWII ship in very deep water nearby....I'd also read about another vision I think on the Marie St Claire website who saw her in some sort of pipe and she was alive and broke something off (maybe a bracelet/anklet) to leave behind and that she also was trying to scratch something into the pipe as in write something.  The person mentioned that it could have been some sort of water main....just thoughts that came to mind.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 08, 2008, 02:03:30 AM
I hope I don't offend any of my monkey friends here but this thought crosses my mind every time I see a picture of Rudy Croes........Planet of the Apes...o.k.  I said it and I won't repeat it, please don't be mad at me. :2doh:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 08, 2008, 02:06:24 AM
GOODNIGHT ALL!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: texasmom on January 08, 2008, 02:09:49 AM
I love it Klaas, thanks! :lol:

and goodnite!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: hotping on January 08, 2008, 02:12:52 AM
mach1
Postus Allthefuckingtimeus


Joined: 30 Mar 2004
Posts: 3152

 Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2005 10:43 pm    Post subject:   

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
I had this very strangely vividly lucid dream last Thursday. I saw underwater sub scuba divers with welding torches sealing something shut. It was really wierd because Id never had such a vivid dream before. Whats the connection in my mind to Aruba?
I dont know either. But it was outstanding in my mind at the
time so that was quite strange.

http://www.comebackalive.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=10351&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=90
 

Two things come to mind after reading this, first the article the tourist wrote regarding the Renaissance Island boat that was sunk that was in shallow water; they also mentioned a WWII ship in very deep water nearby....I'd also read about another vision I think on the Marie St Claire website who saw her in some sort of pipe and she was alive and broke something off (maybe a bracelet/anklet) to leave behind and that she also was trying to scratch something into the pipe as in write something.  The person mentioned that it could have been some sort of water main....just thoughts that came to mind.
I have read these things also and the one about the Renaissance Island thing just really gave Me chills when I saw it over the weekend...Someone definitely needs to check it out....Goodnight All! 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: igsigs on January 08, 2008, 02:13:54 AM
1/8/08

Rudy Croes threatens to Boycott relations with the Holland for the 10th time and they blame the National Geographic article on Natalee. Another typical day in Aruba  :wink:

And it looks like they are complaining about the National Geographic article...and one in the Philadelphia Bulletin? Likely the Philadelphia Inquirer - the Bulletin stopped printing about 30 years ago.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 08, 2008, 02:38:55 AM
Needle in a haystack

Information Overload Still Plagues Holloway Disappearance

By Brian Livingston

Trying to find the truth about the disappearance of his daughter, Dave Holloway and his attorney must first wade through a sea of misinformation.

Monday was a prime example of what Holloway must put up with.

A man, who said he was calling from Nicaragua, contacted Holloway telling him he knew the whereabouts of his daughter, 18-year old Natalee Holloway, who has been missing since March 25, 2005 during a senior trip to Aruba. After talking with the man who would not give his name or phone number, Dave Holloway has all but written off the "source" as bogus.

"I've gotten a lot of strange stories since Natalee's disappearance," said Holloway. "Although the number of calls aren't as bad as they used to be, we still get them."

After listening to the man's claims, Holloway referred him to the attorney handling the case on this end.

"I'm about at the point where I'm running out of options," said Holloway. "The case has been closed by Aruban authorities and there just isn't any good information coming in anymore. But I still have to listen to every story I can. Maybe one day something will come from one of them."

A boat is still searching off the island of Aruba for Natalee's body. Working alongside Texas EquuSearch, a non-profit organization that specializes in searching for missing persons, Holloway said the owner of a survey boat equipped with some of the most up to date undersea technology has generously volunteered his time and crew to search for the missing teen.

"They've been down there for about three weeks," Holloway said. "You never know, maybe they'll find something."

Natalee Holloway was last seen the night before she and her classmates from Mountain Brook High School, located just outside Birmingham, Ala., were due to return from Aruba on a senior trip. Witnesses said they saw her get into a car occupied by three Aruban natives, Joran van der Sloot, Deepak Kalpoe and his younger brother, Satish Kalpoe.

During a television interview for the news program 48 Hours on March 25, 2006, Aruben Lead Investigator Gerold Dompig said theories surrounding the investigation, prior to it being closed, included Natalee's body being moved two or more times. The "source" Monday said the body was buried in Nicaragua instead of being dumped in the ocean as first suspected. Holloway has his doubts.

"He claims to have physical evidence but then balked at sending me samples so I could have DNA checked," Dave Holloway said. "There's another sign that this may be just another dead end."


Holloway has now been around the block several times since his daughter became missing. He knows there are a large number of people who would like to gain some sort of financial windfall by providing false information. As tiresome as it gets to field these kinds of calls, Holloway knows he has to listen, if for just a minute.

"Some people mean well and are genuinely trying to help but others are out there to rip you off," he said. "It's just something we have to put up with right now."

It will all stop when Natalee is found, he said.

http://www.meridianstar.com/local/local_story_008001043.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: texasmom on January 08, 2008, 02:59:56 AM
Needle in a haystack

Information Overload Still Plagues Holloway Disappearance

 "Some people mean well and are genuinely trying to help but others are out there to rip you off," he said. "It's just something we have to put up with right now."

It will all stop when Natalee is found, he said.

http://www.meridianstar.com/local/local_story_008001043.html

and to think.....for over two and a half years this has gone on....heartbreaking.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: sirensong on January 08, 2008, 03:01:55 AM
I hope I don't offend any of my monkey friends here but this thought crosses my mind every time I see a picture of Rudy Croes........Planet of the Apes...o.k.  I said it and I won't repeat it, please don't be mad at me. :2doh:

He gives me the CREEPS!  There is something ugly about him, and I don't mean just his looking like a leprechaun.  Just scary looking to me, most people don't affect me that  way and he has ever since I first saw him.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: texasmom on January 08, 2008, 03:33:25 AM
I hope I don't offend any of my monkey friends here but this thought crosses my mind every time I see a picture of Rudy Croes........Planet of the Apes...o.k.  I said it and I won't repeat it, please don't be mad at me. :2doh:

He gives me the CREEPS!  There is something ugly about him, and I don't mean just his looking like a leprechaun.  Just scary looking to me, most people don't affect me that  way and he has ever since I first saw him.

me too...the only word I can think of to describe it is EVIL...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: MumInOhio on January 08, 2008, 06:39:21 AM
Thanks for all the help with the boats everyone. DePalm Tours/Pelican are situated right by the HI. I remember reading  the "Octopus' left the next day and also all about Captain Jethro. Also saw the 'Pair of Dice', 'Caroline' and 'Arawak King' posted about, but I'm not sure what type of boats these even are.

Scubajap said that she knew of at least 3 of these type (assuming tour/excursion) boats staying in the water that night as everyone went to the Soul beach festival and it didn't finish until late. (And of course, then they would be ready for business the next day).

They appear to be mostly catamarans.....didn't we just see a picture of one upside down on the ocean floor!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Hotshot on January 08, 2008, 07:23:11 AM
Thanks for all the help with the boats everyone. DePalm Tours/Pelican are situated right by the HI. I remember reading  the "Octopus' left the next day and also all about Captain Jethro. Also saw the 'Pair of Dice', 'Caroline' and 'Arawak King' posted about, but I'm not sure what type of boats these even are.

Scubajap said that she knew of at least 3 of these type (assuming tour/excursion) boats staying in the water that night as everyone went to the Soul beach festival and it didn't finish until late. (And of course, then they would be ready for business the next day).

They appear to be mostly catamarans.....didn't we just see a picture of one upside down on the ocean floor!

Maybe the many pictures here will help.    http://www.guiafashion.com/fashion/internacional/27to29-05-05soulbeach/index.htm


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Peaches on January 08, 2008, 08:13:25 AM
Even though the above post is from Amnesty International, it contains an English summary of Aruban law, for what its worth.

Does #95 sound kinda like the felony murder doctrine used in the US?  As in not just the perpetrator but others who are party to the commission of the crime? 

I read thru a great deal of this document and it is very interesting.  Thanks for finding and posting it.  Of course, if they  don't even follow their own rules, what are you going to do?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Mere on January 08, 2008, 08:32:18 AM
The Meridian Star should have better information.  Natalee did not go missing March 25, 2005.
Mr. Livingston may want to re-check his data before writing an article.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: MumInOhio on January 08, 2008, 08:49:27 AM
Good Morning!   Thanks Hotshot! Do you know anything about GVC house.... was it always yellow? Looking for a house that could be confused with Astrid's or maybe Lorenzo's. TIA


Did anyone notice anything when they opened that blog link that  Klaas posted last night, or is it just me? :shock:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: MumInOhio on January 08, 2008, 09:47:52 AM
Good Morning!   Thanks Hotshot! Do you know anything about GVC house.... was it always yellow? Looking for a house that could be confused with Astrid's or maybe Lorenzo's. TIA


Did anyone notice anything when they opened that blog link that  Klaas posted last night, or is it just me? :shock:


scrap the first part...have found what I was looking for.

Marlee :sad:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 08, 2008, 10:27:22 AM
Good Morning!   Thanks Hotshot! Do you know anything about GVC house.... was it always yellow? Looking for a house that could be confused with Astrid's or maybe Lorenzo's. TIA


Did anyone notice anything when they opened that blog link that  Klaas posted last night, or is it just me? :shock:


 :smt017


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 08, 2008, 10:29:22 AM
Posted by MF at RU (Note: This was on a TV program per MF and I don't know the accuracy of what MF is posting or if it's published in Bondia or Arubatoday)


Gerold Dompig admits in the Holloway case
Should have focused more on the US part in the investigation
Something that did not happen due to pressure and intimidation by (i.e.) the FBI


by Tito Laclé

Requesting more help and involving the US, is one of the things that Dompig, who was the first Chief investigator wants to do. This is what he declared on the TV program "Ta Asina Ta" last night in his latest interview on this topic.

On the insistance of the presentator Tito Laclé, Dompig answered a series of questions directly related to this most commented and complicated case. From his thoughts on the closing of the case to the impact that the case had on Aruba, all this was answered last night by ex-chief of Police, Gerold Dompig.

On the fact that the case is closed, Dompig said that the case is not closed and should no be. Officially the suspect are no longer suspects. But the case can never be closed. There is more information that can come up later on. It is known that after long years, information can still come in. The decision is understandable but there might be new things happening that will open the case again. He goes further by saying that the case will have a solution. And if possible, this year, 2008.

On the question if Gerold Dompig stayed on the case from the beginning till the end, how much different it will be today. Dompig said that he does not want to speak of Dompig alone, but a team. What he would have done different is try to get more information from the US. Something that was very weak according to Dompig's statement.

It was confirmed last night that during his time as chief investigator, there was a lot of pressure coming from the American authorities and political threatening calls for intimidation (*). The pressure was enormous on Dompig as well as the whole team. It was known that once they focus on the US part, through the FBI or other agencies, there would be setbacks.

One of the points is that there is no treaty between Aruba and the US on this type of issues. If there was a treaty, it would have been easier for the FBI agents to assit Aruba in a more active and participating way, contrary to the case now. Something that even the FBI agents commented to Dompig on several occasions.

One the lessons that could be learned, Dompig always said that they could have done a better job. For the police, recoding the interrogations was good, but you must maintain your local language for the interrogations, which was something that was not done. They choose to use the Dutch language so that the Dutch investigators could follow the interrogations.

*(On tape Dompig said that intimidations came from a US congressman and he was even asked to go the States but refused to do so)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 08, 2008, 10:40:02 AM
Also posted at RU - nice to see some of the RU posters making sense:

Quote from: K_Meine
the similarities in these two statements:

Ex 1:

Quote
Oranjestad, Aruba (CNN) - One of three young suspects arrested Thursday in the investigation into the disappearance of an Alabama teenager has confessed to her murder, a senior police official said late Friday.

The suspect has agreed to lead police to the body of 18 year old Natalee Holloway, the police official said.

"This was a murder, I've seen the evidence and you haven't" Jan van der straaten Chief of Police

Ex 2:

Quote
Gary Michael Hilton, 61, showed investigators the spot where Meredith Emerson's body lay, said John Cagle, an agent with the Georgia Bureau of Investigation's Field Division.

Residents reported seeing Hilton's van in the Dawson Forest Management Area, where the body was found, miles from where Emerson was last seen, Cagle said. A search had been planned there before Hilton told authorities where to look, he said.

The wiry, grizzled Hilton was well known in the area, often seen with his dog, Dandy, and police-style baton, Union County Sheriff Scott Stephens said. Hilton was the last person seen on the trail with Emerson, and investigators had gotten countless calls since identifying him as a person of interest in her disappearance, Stephens said.

The former was recanted and some say it was a misquote and taken out of context. The same could probably be said about the latter except that it produced results. Anyone have any ideas as to why?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: MumInOhio on January 08, 2008, 10:53:29 AM
Good Morning!   Thanks Hotshot! Do you know anything about GVC house.... was it always yellow? Looking for a house that could be confused with Astrid's or maybe Lorenzo's. TIA


Did anyone notice anything when they opened that blog link that  Klaas posted last night, or is it just me? :shock:


 :smt017


Well, I guess it's just me...It showed my ISP, my internet company and what IE I had and then said ha ha!

Had it opened for a while before I went to read and it was a couple down ...went :shock:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 08, 2008, 10:57:07 AM
Good Morning!   Thanks Hotshot! Do you know anything about GVC house.... was it always yellow? Looking for a house that could be confused with Astrid's or maybe Lorenzo's. TIA


Did anyone notice anything when they opened that blog link that  Klaas posted last night, or is it just me? :shock:


 :smt017


Well, I guess it's just me...It showed my ISP, my internet company and what IE I had and then said ha ha!

Had it opened for a while before I went to read and it was a couple down ...went :shock:

Yeah, there are programs that do that.  The same thing happens at the RaceJunkies forum.  I'm not sure but my guess is only you can read it but it is surprising to see. :D


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 08, 2008, 11:06:16 AM
oh.....yes, it was in a little box inside some guys post. I have seen those many times before around the net.

~~~~~~~~~
Julia must be all done with RU now that Joran is free.  :roll:
Guess she has nothing to disinform about now  :roll:
No posts since Dec. 23rd.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: MumInOhio on January 08, 2008, 11:17:44 AM
Klaas and Nut thanks...now I feel much better...maybe I'll go back and read! :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 08, 2008, 11:18:03 AM
http://www.24ora.com/content/view/3418/5/#jc_allComments

(http://www.24ora.com/images/stories/news/breaking%20news.gif)

Homber a cay den laman bruto na conchi         
Tuesday, 08 January 2008 


Pa mas of menos 11.30 di mainta un homber lo mester a cay den laman na e parti bruto na natural pool esta conchi. Esaki ta hopi peligroso mirando e olanan grandi y e barancanan cu tin eynan. Nos tin informe cu e homber lo mester ta wanta na un di e barancanan. Autoridadnan policial, brandweer, helicopter y otronan ta na caminda pa e sitio

Through translator:


man owing to cay in sea bruto at conchi

tuesday, 08 january 2008

for more or less 11.30 of morning one man will have to owing to cay in sea at the part bruto at natural pool esta conchi. this is much dangerous mirando the olanan big y the barancanan cu have eynan. we have informe cu he will have to is wanta at one of the barancanan. autoridadnan policial, brandweer, helicopter y others is at caminda for her sitio come across


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: downloadingdaddy on January 08, 2008, 11:38:58 AM
Good Morning all!
Does anyone know if there has been any happenings in the kalpoe/dr. phil case? I haven't seen an update in a very long time.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 08, 2008, 11:41:27 AM
Good Morning all!
Does anyone know if there has been any happenings in the kalpoe/dr. phil case? I haven't seen an update in a very long time.

Case Number: BC363201
DEEPAK KALPOE VS PHILLIP C MCGRAW
Filing Date: 12/13/2006
Case Type: Defamation (Slander/Libel) (General Jurisdiction)
Status: Pending



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Future Hearings
02/05/2008 at 08:30 am in department 69 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
Motion Pro Hac Vice (2) MTN TO DISMISS3) MTN FOR SUBST. OF PERS. REP.FOR DECEASED DEFT4) MTN FOR STAY OF ORDER5) CASE MANAGEMENT CONF6) OSC RE FTA ON 12/7/07)

02/29/2008 at 08:30 am in department 69 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
Motion to Compel ((2))



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: AZSunny on January 08, 2008, 11:46:43 AM
http://www.24ora.com/content/view/3418/5/#jc_allComments

(http://www.24ora.com/images/stories/news/breaking%20news.gif)

Homber a cay den laman bruto na conchi         
Tuesday, 08 January 2008 


Pa mas of menos 11.30 di mainta un homber lo mester a cay den laman na e parti bruto na natural pool esta conchi. Esaki ta hopi peligroso mirando e olanan grandi y e barancanan cu tin eynan. Nos tin informe cu e homber lo mester ta wanta na un di e barancanan. Autoridadnan policial, brandweer, helicopter y otronan ta na caminda pa e sitio

Through translator:


man owing to cay in sea bruto at conchi

tuesday, 08 january 2008

for more or less 11.30 of morning one man will have to owing to cay in sea at the part bruto at natural pool esta conchi. this is much dangerous mirando the olanan big y the barancanan cu have eynan. we have informe cu he will have to is wanta at one of the barancanan. autoridadnan policial, brandweer, helicopter y others is at caminda for her sitio come across


Klaas, can you translate the translator?  Is this saying someone fell in the water at the natural bridge and they are trying to recover them?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 08, 2008, 11:49:38 AM
AZSunny - I'm not sure.  Let me run it through a Portuguese translator too.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Magnolia on January 08, 2008, 11:50:46 AM
Dr. Biden is on the view talking about important cases.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 08, 2008, 11:51:14 AM
AZSunny - I'm not sure.  Let me run it through a Portuguese translator too.

Didn't really help.  Maybe it says something like the man was watching the big waves and fell in?  Not sure.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: AZSunny on January 08, 2008, 11:53:32 AM
AZSunny - I'm not sure.  Let me run it through a Portuguese translator too.

Didn't really help.  Maybe it says something like the man was watching the big waves and fell in?  Not sure.

Thanks anyway Klaas.  Speaking of big waves, have we heard anything from the Persistence since Sunday?  I don't see a new posting from Kyle since Sunday on his blog.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: sirensong on January 08, 2008, 12:22:27 PM
Good Morning!   Thanks Hotshot! Do you know anything about GVC house.... was it always yellow? Looking for a house that could be confused with Astrid's or maybe Lorenzo's. TIA


Did anyone notice anything when they opened that blog link that  Klaas posted last night, or is it just me? :shock:

Yes, someone had my IP address and and info in a little box, and a picture of a guy flipping me off :shock: Ticked me off.  :smt097


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Sam on January 08, 2008, 12:27:51 PM
Klaas ,
can you please post the photo of the drawing we all thought looked like Jerry Strawberry?  Thanks
Sam


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 08, 2008, 12:31:10 PM
Klaas ,
can you please post the photo of the drawing we all thought looked like Jerry Strawberry?  Thanks
Sam

FYI - most of these photos are in the Aruban Who's Who thread in the Important Case Document area, including this one:


(http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h291/SunFreak2/DrawingofAccosternearFishermansHuts.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: JusticeforNatalee on January 08, 2008, 12:37:42 PM
I wonder if this is what Rudy is whining about:

Scroll down (bottom of page) and there is a blurb that repeats
the poor rating info in NG Traveler:

http://www.thebulletin.us/site/news.cfm?newsid=19174991&BRD=2737&PAG=461&dept_id=623508&rfi=6

 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: sirensong on January 08, 2008, 12:38:59 PM
Posted by MF at RU (Note: This was on a TV program per MF and I don't know the accuracy of what MF is posting or if it's published in Bondia or Arubatoday)


Gerold Dompig admits in the Holloway case
Should have focused more on the US part in the investigation
Something that did not happen due to pressure and intimidation by (i.e.) the FBI


by Tito Laclé

Requesting more help and involving the US, is one of the things that Dompig, who was the first Chief investigator wants to do. This is what he declared on the TV program "Ta Asina Ta" last night in his latest interview on this topic.

On the insistance of the presentator Tito Laclé, Dompig answered a series of questions directly related to this most commented and complicated case. From his thoughts on the closing of the case to the impact that the case had on Aruba, all this was answered last night by ex-chief of Police, Gerold Dompig.

On the fact that the case is closed, Dompig said that the case is not closed and should no be. Officially the suspect are no longer suspects. But the case can never be closed. There is more information that can come up later on. It is known that after long years, information can still come in. The decision is understandable but there might be new things happening that will open the case again. He goes further by saying that the case will have a solution. And if possible, this year, 2008.

On the question if Gerold Dompig stayed on the case from the beginning till the end, how much different it will be today. Dompig said that he does not want to speak of Dompig alone, but a team. What he would have done different is try to get more information from the US. Something that was very weak according to Dompig's statement.

It was confirmed last night that during his time as chief investigator, there was a lot of pressure coming from the American authorities and political threatening calls for intimidation (*). The pressure was enormous on Dompig as well as the whole team. It was known that once they focus on the US part, through the FBI or other agencies, there would be setbacks.

One of the points is that there is no treaty between Aruba and the US on this type of issues. If there was a treaty, it would have been easier for the FBI agents to assit Aruba in a more active and participating way, contrary to the case now. Something that even the FBI agents commented to Dompig on several occasions.

One the lessons that could be learned, Dompig always said that they could have done a better job. For the police, recoding the interrogations was good, but you must maintain your local language for the interrogations, which was something that was not done. They choose to use the Dutch language so that the Dutch investigators could follow the interrogations.

*(On tape Dompig said that intimidations came from a US congressman and he was even asked to go the States but refused to do so)


He makes me so mad.  Blaming everyone else for his screw up.  He wants FBI now?  They were more concerned about the lack of a treaty when they could have found Natalee?  They weren't worried about laws in place to protect the victims.  Wasn't he in charge?  If he wanted to do interrogations in local language, shouldn't he have insisted?  Is he admitting the Dutch friends of Paulus were telling him what to do?  I think that's  exactly what happened.  He blew it and has no one to blame but himself for being a loser.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 08, 2008, 12:39:31 PM
Klaas
I am sorry but would lead me to the location of all the 302's given in this case to the FBI?  Are they all listed in the Important Case Documents thread or just a few?  I have seen them before, but I can't remember if I was here or at BFN. TIA


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: sirensong on January 08, 2008, 12:42:17 PM
I wonder if this is what Rudy is whining about:

Scroll down (bottom of page) and there is a blurb that repeats
the poor rating info in NG Traveler:

http://www.thebulletin.us/site/news.cfm?newsid=19174991&BRD=2737&PAG=461&dept_id=623508&rfi=6

 
Question:?I'm thinking of a vacation on the island of Aruba. Should all the bad publicity from that recent murder case deter me?

Answer:?I'll tell you what might deter you. National Geographic Traveler recently rated the world's islands. It gave Aruba a low rating as one of the "Islands in Trouble: Under severe pressure, excessive tourism; many working to recover." The top-rated island is the Faroe Islands (Denmark); Aruba was rated No. 35. "A vacation factory with fabulous beaches," Aruba is "overbuilt, gaudy, fast losing its culture." "Cruise ships have resulted in a tacky downtown." A minority of reviewers calls Aruba "dynamic, interesting." You might want to read the whole review of islands in the November/December 2007 edition of National Geographic Traveler.

snip: 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: JusticeforNatalee on January 08, 2008, 12:42:30 PM
Here' s the text for the Bulletin link:

Question:?I'm thinking of a vacation on the island of Aruba. Should all the bad publicity from that recent murder case deter me?

Answer:?I'll tell you what might deter you. National Geographic Traveler recently rated the world's islands. It gave Aruba a low rating as one of the "Islands in Trouble: Under severe pressure, excessive tourism; many working to recover." The top-rated island is the Faroe Islands (Denmark); Aruba was rated No. 35. "A vacation factory with fabulous beaches," Aruba is "overbuilt, gaudy, fast losing its culture." "Cruise ships have resulted in a tacky downtown." A minority of reviewers calls Aruba "dynamic, interesting." You might want to read the whole review of islands in the November/December 2007 edition of National Geographic Traveler.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 08, 2008, 12:45:24 PM
Klaas
I am sorry but would lead me to the location of all the 302's given in this case to the FBI?  Are they all listed in the Important Case Documents thread or just a few?  I have seen them before, but I can't remember if I was here or at BFN. TIA

The ones we have are in the Important Case Document area.

Edited to add:  We may only have Whatleys.  You can go to BFN to read them all.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Hotshot on January 08, 2008, 12:45:56 PM
I wonder if this is what Rudy is whining about:

Scroll down (bottom of page) and there is a blurb that repeats
the poor rating info in NG Traveler:

http://www.thebulletin.us/site/news.cfm?newsid=19174991&BRD=2737&PAG=461&dept_id=623508&rfi=6

 
you mean this?

Question:?I'm thinking of a vacation on the island of Aruba. Should all the bad publicity from that recent murder case deter me?

Answer:?I'll tell you what might deter you. National Geographic Traveler recently rated the world's islands. It gave Aruba a low rating as one of the "Islands in Trouble: Under severe pressure, excessive tourism; many working to recover." The top-rated island is the Faroe Islands (Denmark); Aruba was rated No. 35. "A vacation factory with fabulous beaches," Aruba is "overbuilt, gaudy, fast losing its culture." "Cruise ships have resulted in a tacky downtown." A minority of reviewers calls Aruba "dynamic, interesting." You might want to read the whole review of islands in the November/December 2007 edition of National Geographic Traveler

 :lol: :lol: :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Sam on January 08, 2008, 12:53:17 PM
Klaas ,
can you please post the photo of the drawing we all thought looked like Jerry Strawberry?  Thanks
Sam

FYI - most of these photos are in the Aruban Who's Who thread in the Important Case Document area, including this one:


(http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h291/SunFreak2/DrawingofAccosternearFishermansHuts.jpg)



Klaas,
Thank you so much . I tried looking there and did not find this one.

Maybe I am crazy but thought he sort of resembled the Jeff  who is the first mate on the Octopus. Except for the glasses.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 08, 2008, 12:55:52 PM
I have not seen it verified that the MB kids even went on the Octopus, have you?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Sam on January 08, 2008, 12:57:28 PM
I guess I should have added the link so folks could compare.

http://www.octopusaruba.com/index.html

JMHO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Sam on January 08, 2008, 01:00:51 PM
I have not seen it verified that the MB kids even went on the Octopus, have you?

Klaas ,I though i had seen it verified very early in the case but do not know where And No I do not have proof.  I did look through some of the archives of RWV yesterday and saw it mentioned but NO no proof.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 08, 2008, 01:12:19 PM
I have not seen it verified that the MB kids even went on the Octopus, have you?

Klaas ,I though i had seen it verified very early in the case but do not know where And No I do not have proof.  I did look through some of the archives of RWV yesterday and saw it mentioned but NO no proof.

I've never seen any proof that they were on the Octopus.  Red Sail Aruba has snorkeling excursions too:

http://www.aruba-redsail.com/snorkeling.shtml


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 08, 2008, 01:21:02 PM
Klaas
I am sorry but would lead me to the location of all the 302's given in this case to the FBI?  Are they all listed in the Important Case Documents thread or just a few?  I have seen them before, but I can't remember if I was here or at BFN. TIA

The ones we have are in the Important Case Document area.

Edited to add:  We may only have Whatleys.  You can go to BFN to read them all.


Sorry, again...I really am..do you have any idea where at BFN they are located?  I am completely lost over there.  :2doh:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 08, 2008, 01:28:38 PM
Klaas
I am sorry but would lead me to the location of all the 302's given in this case to the FBI?  Are they all listed in the Important Case Documents thread or just a few?  I have seen them before, but I can't remember if I was here or at BFN. TIA

The ones we have are in the Important Case Document area.

Edited to add:  We may only have Whatleys.  You can go to BFN to read them all.


Sorry, again...I really am..do you have any idea where at BFN they are located?  I am completely lost over there.  :2doh:

Legal Documents - page 2 & 3 - Affidavits:

http://blogsfornatalee.com/forum/index.php?board=18.20


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: msmarple on January 08, 2008, 01:29:14 PM
I have not seen it verified that the MB kids even went on the Octopus, have you?

Klaas ,I though i had seen it verified very early in the case but do not know where And No I do not have proof.  I did look through some of the archives of RWV yesterday and saw it mentioned but NO no proof.

I've never seen any proof that they were on the Octopus.  Red Sail Aruba has snorkeling excursions too:

http://www.aruba-redsail.com/snorkeling.shtml

IIRC, whether Natalee went on the snorkeling trip (or whatever type adventure) was one of the questions asked at that October 2006 meeting, attended by Beth, Dave and Robin, and other family members.

Unfortunately I don't recall the answer, and don't know whether we have a thread re. that Q/A session.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 08, 2008, 01:33:36 PM
I have not seen it verified that the MB kids even went on the Octopus, have you?

Klaas ,I though i had seen it verified very early in the case but do not know where And No I do not have proof.  I did look through some of the archives of RWV yesterday and saw it mentioned but NO no proof.

The Rumor at RWV was that the boat vanished. But we heard the same thing about Posner and the Manager at the HI in June 2005.



Octopus Sailing Charters - Aruba
LesMes -

Captain Jethro Gesterkamp and his First Mate Jeff have been initiating delighted visitors to snorkeling and the relaxation of multi-hull sailing for over 25 years, the last 18 with Jethro's 40 ft trimaran sailboat, The Octopus. ... sailing a charterboat in Aruba can surpass Jethro's record. Conveniently located on the beach between the Holiday Inn and the Playa Linda Beach Resort, The Octopus ...www.octopus-aruba.com/index.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 08, 2008, 01:40:37 PM
Klaas
I am sorry but would lead me to the location of all the 302's given in this case to the FBI?  Are they all listed in the Important Case Documents thread or just a few?  I have seen them before, but I can't remember if I was here or at BFN. TIA

The ones we have are in the Important Case Document area.

Edited to add:  We may only have Whatleys.  You can go to BFN to read them all.


Sorry, again...I really am..do you have any idea where at BFN they are located?  I am completely lost over there.  :2doh:

Legal Documents - page 2 & 3 - Affidavits:

http://blogsfornatalee.com/forum/index.php?board=18.20

Thank you...again I am sorry to bother you.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 08, 2008, 01:49:09 PM
Again...I need help from some monkey...what time did it say that Natalee entered the casino?  What time did Joran come in?  What time was Paulus sitting at the table next to Natalee...I know...it isn't proven that it's him...just humor me. TIA


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 08, 2008, 02:04:51 PM
Again...I need help from some monkey...what time did it say that Natalee entered the casino?  What time did Joran come in?  What time was Paulus sitting at the table next to Natalee...I know...it isn't proven that it's him...just humor me. TIA

Here's the casino video, you can check the times:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YA3NKpGHnqc


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Magnolia on January 08, 2008, 02:12:21 PM
Klaas ,
can you please post the photo of the drawing we all thought looked like Jerry Strawberry?  Thanks
Sam

FYI - most of these photos are in the Aruban Who's Who thread in the Important Case Document area, including this one:


(http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h291/SunFreak2/DrawingofAccosternearFishermansHuts.jpg)



Klaas,
Thank you so much . I tried looking there and did not find this one.

Maybe I am crazy but thought he sort of resembled the Jeff  who is the first mate on the Octopus. Except for the glasses.

I thought the same when I saw the photo of the 1st mate.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 08, 2008, 02:14:02 PM
Again...I need help from some monkey...what time did it say that Natalee entered the casino?  What time did Joran come in?  What time was Paulus sitting at the table next to Natalee...I know...it isn't proven that it's him...just humor me. TIA

The timestamp is exactly 8:14 PM when the video was made of Jorna,PVDS and Natalee at the BJ table


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: MumInOhio on January 08, 2008, 02:21:17 PM
Lala's...back on the last thread...page 43...#844...there is a post I found on the front page about the time stamps being changed.  Gaps in the timeline. :roll:




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Pita on January 08, 2008, 02:24:36 PM
I have not seen it verified that the MB kids even went on the Octopus, have you?

Klaas ,I though i had seen it verified very early in the case but do not know where And No I do not have proof.  I did look through some of the archives of RWV yesterday and saw it mentioned but NO no proof.

I've never seen any proof that they were on the Octopus.  Red Sail Aruba has snorkeling excursions too:

http://www.aruba-redsail.com/snorkeling.shtml

IIRC, whether Natalee went on the snorkeling trip (or whatever type adventure) was one of the questions asked at that October 2006 meeting, attended by Beth, Dave and Robin, and other family members.

Unfortunately I don't recall the answer, and don't know whether we have a thread re. that Q/A session.

According to Whatley's 302, Natalee did go on the snorkeling trip, but the only persons on the trip besides MB kids and two chaperones were the boat's two crew members. 

No mention of what tour service was used.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 08, 2008, 02:29:20 PM
Wel, well, well.I see she has crawled out from under her rock  :roll:

Glenda Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:01 pm
I can assure you that this case is NOT closed! The first to whine about the case being closed was the Twittys! JMO, they've done everything possible to get it closed starting in June 2005!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: private eye on January 08, 2008, 02:30:37 PM
There are some photos of them on a catamaran and what looks like a charter fishing boat at RU, if my memory is right. And that is questionable:)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 08, 2008, 02:33:55 PM
Again...I need help from some monkey...what time did it say that Natalee entered the casino?  What time did Joran come in?  What time was Paulus sitting at the table next to Natalee...I know...it isn't proven that it's him...just humor me. TIA

The timestamp is exactly 8:14 PM when the video was made of Jorna,PVDS and Natalee at the BJ table

Is there a timestamp when Natalee entered the casino?  Do we have that or is what I am talking about after her return trip from the bathroom or something?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: private eye on January 08, 2008, 02:35:32 PM
Hello everyone. I have been trying to think of something effective that can be done to help Beth keep the pressure on Aruba. Does anyone think this might be an effective tool?

If we had a good letter writer and an attorny to review the letter to assess liability, I wonder how effective it would be to write a letter to the major newspapers of each state basically to tell of Beth's treatment, the boycott, etc


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: MumInOhio on January 08, 2008, 02:41:47 PM
Lala's...see what these posters think....looks like they studied that video

Some interesting posts from the front page about the casino video. I recall that it was discussed a few weeks back.

   10061906 on May 10th, 2007 5:52 pm
I have a problem with this casino tape.
Play it frame by frame. It shows Natalee walking into the casino at 20:58.
The time line when she is sitting at the table is 20:25
At one point at 20:25 it appears she is on a cell phone and Lee is not there.
At another frame also 20:25 Natalee has no phone is just sitting and watching and Lee is back. I’m not trying to rewrite anything but how can you be seated watching a card game before you come into the casino? Also the two times when Joran enters the casino and the camera cuts to the table with the MBHS Students they are two different scenes.

   minnesota dad on May 10th, 2007 6:55 pm
1006 -
My point from the other day. The time stamps on the videos are wacky. Joran shows up thirty minutes before….Natalee shows up thirty minutes after she was supposed to be at that table.
   
Based on all of the corruption and timeline shuffling going on….here is what I think.
Joran entered the casino at 7:58pm.
Natalee entered at 8:58pm
Card Game shows 8:25pm consistently on all of the clips.
Its as if….someone wanted the timeline to fit with the testimony that was out there. Joran testified that he did not make it to the blackjack tables until 10:pm after playing out his father’s “free” chips at the Free Texas Hold ‘em Tourney.
Joran stating this would help out Paulus’ alibi and would distance Paulus from how late he was there playing blackjack. I believe the clock on the camera shots has been altered to attempt to show that Paulus was at the casino earlier in the evening (8:25pm) without worrying about Joran’s testimony…..because he lies anyways. If Paulus was at the casino after the time where Natalee entered (8:58pm)…it once again screws up Paulus’ alibi and timeline.
In the end….Paulus is your perp. This appears to be one more attempt by Aruban law enforcement to leak information that would help timelines that has backfired. What a bunch of amateurs.


1.   10061906 on May 10th, 2007 7:44 pm
Minnesota Dad: Thanks I thought I wasn’t seeing something correctly; My opinion these videos have been altered. It wasn’t stolen and leaked to ABC.
It was a deliberate attempt to alter timelines.
Check the frames. I’m sure Natalee is on a cellphone. Another she is constantly looking at Ruth’s watch.
It is almost as if she can’t wait to go somewhere to meet someone.
 
 
 
 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: private eye on January 08, 2008, 02:42:25 PM
Again...I need help from some monkey...what time did it say that Natalee entered the casino?  What time did Joran come in?  What time was Paulus sitting at the table next to Natalee...I know...it isn't proven that it's him...just humor me. TIA

The timestamp is exactly 8:14 PM when the video was made of Jorna,PVDS and Natalee at the BJ table

Is there a timestamp when Natalee entered the casino?  Do we have that or is what I am talking about after her return trip from the bathroom or something?

Not too many days ago somebody posted that and discovered "proof" that the time on a photo had been changed. Can you search the last months posts?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 08, 2008, 02:42:34 PM
Sorry, Klaas provided me a link to the video...I will be good for a while.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 08, 2008, 02:44:11 PM
Again...I need help from some monkey...what time did it say that Natalee entered the casino?  What time did Joran come in?  What time was Paulus sitting at the table next to Natalee...I know...it isn't proven that it's him...just humor me. TIA

The timestamp is exactly 8:14 PM when the video was made of Jorna,PVDS and Natalee at the BJ table

I am incompetent when it comes to searching anywhere. LOL  That is why I ask so many questions, but I am certain there is someone much better qualified than me to help you. 

Is there a timestamp when Natalee entered the casino?  Do we have that or is what I am talking about after her return trip from the bathroom or something?

Not too many days ago somebody posted that and discovered "proof" that the time on a photo had been changed. Can you search the last months posts?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 08, 2008, 03:06:38 PM
Again...I need help from some monkey...what time did it say that Natalee entered the casino?  What time did Joran come in?  What time was Paulus sitting at the table next to Natalee...I know...it isn't proven that it's him...just humor me. TIA

The timestamp is exactly 8:14 PM when the video was made of Jorna,PVDS and Natalee at the BJ table

Is there a timestamp when Natalee entered the casino?  Do we have that or is what I am talking about after her return trip from the bathroom or something?

Not too many days ago somebody posted that and discovered "proof" that the time on a photo had been changed. Can you search the last months posts?

I don't recall that discussion,was it on the front page? Looking back at the few seconds of footage they released it is just weird that Natalee is pointing in Joran's direction and in the same foortage the other MB student is pointing at PVDS. You can clearly see the timestamp on this video. More than 2 hours after Paulus said he left the casino.

(http://img402.imageshack.us/img402/8677/casino3op4.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: MumInOhio on January 08, 2008, 03:17:45 PM
Hi...******* I remember the discussion here a couple of weeks back about the siver camera or whatever and Paulus reaching under the table and I think someone posted a few days later that it appeared someone reached towards his chips. This is all fuzzy to me right now, but that was why I posted the front page page that I had found.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 08, 2008, 03:24:05 PM
Trahadornan di valero pafor di planta 
Local 
Tuesday, 08 January 2008 

(http://www.24ora.com/images/stories/news/breaking%20news.gif)

1.45 pm Nos ta ricibiendo algun informe cu ta indica cu bastante trahador di Valero lo ta saliendo for di e planta. Esaki debi na "power failure" Valero ta evacuando algun empleado pa por preveni cualkier caso lamentabel.

Through translator:

trahadornan of valero abroad of plant
tuesday, 08 january 2008

1.45 pm we is ricibiendo some informe cu is indica cu enough trahador of valero will is saliendo for of the plant. this debi at "power failure" valero is evacuando some employee for can preveni cualkier caso regrettable. come across


Looks like some kind of power failure at Valero and Valero has evacuated some employees
 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 08, 2008, 03:26:44 PM
Hi...******* I remember the discussion here a couple of weeks back about the siver camera or whatever and Paulus reaching under the table and I think someone posted a few days later that it appeared someone reached towards his chips. This is all fuzzy to me right now, but that was why I posted the front page page that I had found.



HI..Yup I remember all that,but I dont recall seeing proof that the timestamp on the casino video was changed.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 08, 2008, 03:27:25 PM
In the previous "Breaking News" regarding the Natural Pool area it looks like they have retrieved the body of possibly a tourist:

for more or less 11.30 of morning one man will have to owing to cay in sea at the part bruto at natural pool esta conchi. this is much dangerous mirando the olanan big y the barancanan cu have eynan. he cu owing to cay is one tourist y for exactly 1 or y 20 of afternoon dr. mungra owing to constata dead of the person. various instancia as helicopter, police, brandweer y ambulance was at the sitio for achieve the curpa. click read more for some of the imagenan. come across

(http://www.24ora.com/mambots/content/multithumb/images/1..stories.news.2008.januari2008.jan8.conchi.P5160101.JPG)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 08, 2008, 03:27:56 PM
Mum
Thanks....this doesn't jive with any thing I am working on now.  Let me explain..if I can... Who spoke to Joran when he arrived at CnC that night?  Which girl was it?  I can't seem to find it anywhere..then again I don't have all the 302's . Also, why doesn't Lee mention the older guy at the table?  We know he is there, but was he so inconspicuous that she did not notice him?  Maybe he was not trying to be noticed. Do we have Ruth McVay's 302?  Why doesn't Joran mention that he met Natalee earlier in the day on the beach?  Was Lee mistaking him for someone else? 
Why does Joran not mention anyone he that came to talk to Joran while he was at the blackjack table? Could it have been Guido...no, he isn't fat...he does have dark hair, which I would think this guy had from Lee's description.  The only two friends he mentions in this first PV are the guys he saw at the bar.  We have to assume from Joran that he followed the girls out to the pool area. He doesn't say that...but Lee does. Now, back to the Chinese/Hawaiian guy...I know some have mentioned him recently.  So who are the likely candidates for this person? 

According to Joran...he calls Jamie on his cell phone after his phone call to daddy sloot around 11:00pm that night.  So I guess Jamie is out...if you choose to believe Joran.  Then who's next?  Koen?  He would fit the description.  He may have been the person that spoke to Joran. Who's next?  The Santos guy...the one that Jossy mentioned once after a question about who else needs to be questioned or something like that.  Does he look more Chinese than Hawaiian?  I can't remember...is he fat?  Could this person have been Steve Croes?  He might look Hawaiian to someone that just glanced at him.  Who is this person...that is a very good question and why hasn't any of the other girls ever mentioned him before.....or have they?  Just thinking out loud, but the times don't jive with what  is in some of the statements...I can't seem to reconcile it all just yet.  Any thoughts?



According to Lee Broughton's 302:

Holloway drinking Red fires and becomes intoxicated.
Dinner between 6 and 7pm.
HOtel casino to watch ruth McVay gamble.
Holloway met Joran earlier in the day on the beach.
8:40pm Natalee switched to a mixed drink with Vodka.

Enter the fat chinese or hawaiian looking guy...friend of Joran.
9:45pm they all go to hotel bar by the pool,  Joran and friend go too.
Five minutes later Joran leaves.  Natalee is the one that invites him to CnC later that night.

After 10:00pm they load up on the bus and leave to go to CNC. Arrived and were doing body shots by 10:45 pm. 
Lee and Natalee went to bathroom around 11:45 or 12:00.  Joran was there and they passed him on way to bathroom without acknowledging him.
Joran was by the steps watching Natalee dance.

Bar closed at 1:00am on Monday May 30, 2005.



Joran's PV of 6/9:

When it was half time of the game my father wanted to go home to go and babysit my ten year old brother. At my father's request I sat in for him and played "Texas Hold'm poker. I am not sure as to when half time was but I think it was between 19.00 and 20.00 hours. I kept on gambling until I lost too. This was according to me until 21.30 to 22.00 hours. I went to walk around in the casino and after that went to the "Blackjack" table to play blackjack. While I was sitting at the table the girl "Natalee" that is missing now to the blackjack table together with her friends. When the English speaking girls came to the blackjack table they introduced themselves. I do not remember the names of the girls anymore but they were from the same group of students that Natalee belonged to. According to me the friends of Natalee played blackjack but Natalee didn't. A girl that was sitting at my left side on the table asked me in English if I could help her play blackjack because she had lost U.S. $ 360,= of her father's money.

<<<<<<<<snipped>>>>>>>>>>>
The girlfriends of the girl asked me if I was going to "Carlos & Charlies" that night. I told them that I couldn't do that because I had school tomorrow. The girls kept insisting that I should meet them at "Carlos & Charlies" because it was their last night on Aruba. After they kept insisting I agreed to meet with at "Carlos & Charlies". I don't know that name of the girl but I remember her from a photo in the newspaper on which Natalee was printed on the left side of her friends and the other girl was on the right side of the friends. This girl is the same girl  that sat at my left side at the blackjack table. After this I told the girl that it was OK and that I would do my best to go to "Carlos & Charlies". After that the group of girls walked to the Sportsbar. In the Sportsbar I also saw to two acquaintances who were watching baseball. I greeted my two acquaintances and told them that I was doing fine too and that I would be going to "Carlos & Charlies" that night. My two acquaintances are named "Luis" and "Joshua".





<<<<<<<<<<<<snipped>>>>>>>>>
After that we drove straight to Carlos & Charlies. Deepak was the driver but I cannot remember now who was sitting beside him. I do not remember now if it was Satish or me. I estimate that we arrived at Carlos & Charlies between 00.15 and 00.30 hours. Deepak parked his car on the parking lot behind Carlos & Charlies and after that we walked into the building of Carlos & Charlies. I don't have to pay because I have a VIP pass. With my VIP pass Deepak and Satish were also allowed in.
When we entered Carlos & Charlies I was greeted by the girl who is printed on the picture. When we got in I saw that Natalee was dancing on the stage/podium. I saw that Natalee wasn't holding a drink. The friend of Natalee said to me to go and dance with Natalee because she fancied me. I took her word for it that Natalee was interested in me. Natalee made hand gestures for me to come and dance with her. I also did not see Natalee with a purse/handbag. She did this about seven to eight times. After I had refused to dance with Natalee Deepak, Satish and myself walked to the bar. There we bought a "Yard Whisky Coke". Such a drink costs U.S. $ 12,-. It is a plastic cup and it comes in different colours. I payed for all three drinks. I got a red cup but I do not remember now what colour cups Deepak and Satish got. Then the three of us walked back to the stage/podium. While I stood there Natalee saw me again. When she saw me she got down from the stage/podium and walked over to me. She grabbed my hand and asked me if I would go to the bar with her. On the way there she said to me that I had to drink a Jellyshots (handwritten with an arrow pointing to this section of the statement, it says "or body shot") off of her. I at that moment in time did know what a Jellyshot was but I did not know that she went and laid down on the bar and that I had to drink the Jellyshot from her belly button.
 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 08, 2008, 03:29:45 PM
Sorry PI, my response to you in your previous post was really messed up.  Ooops!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Kiwi on January 08, 2008, 03:31:14 PM
Hi...******* I remember the discussion here a couple of weeks back about the siver camera or whatever and Paulus reaching under the table and I think someone posted a few days later that it appeared someone reached towards his chips. This is all fuzzy to me right now, but that was why I posted the front page page that I had found.


I was reading the time stamp stuff. Personally, they probably have multiple DVR's, with multiple cameras. They are not in sync with each other. Just like we all have a different time on our computers right now. However, the employee dealer has a time punch card for signing into the game that has to be accurate.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Kermit on January 08, 2008, 03:42:20 PM
Hello everyone. I have been trying to think of something effective that can be done to help Beth keep the pressure on Aruba. Does anyone think this might be an effective tool?

If we had a good letter writer and an attorny to review the letter to assess liability, I wonder how effective it would be to write a letter to the major newspapers of each state basically to tell of Beth's treatment, the boycott, etc

My suggestion would be to turn the tables on Aruba and get a dream team and go to the top & cc Interpol:


At the direction of the President or the Attorney General, the FBI may use its statutory authority to investigate and arrest individuals for violating United States law, even if the FBI’s actions contravene customary international law. The President, acting through the Attorney General, has the inherent constitutional authority to deploy the FBI to investigate and arrest individuals for violating United States law, even if those actions contravene customary international law. Extraterritorial law enforcement activities that are authorized by domestic law are not barred even if they contravene unexecuted treaties or treaty provisions, such as Article 2(4) of the
United Nations Charter. An arrest that is inconsistent with international or foreign law does not violate the Fourth Amendment.

And I would include in that letter:

We read in Extracts of the Espionage and Sabotage Acts and other related federal criminal statutes: U.S. CODE, SECTION 1001, states that "Whoever, in any mater within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact, or makes any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or representations, or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any false, fictitious or fraudulent statement or entry, shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both


Now view this video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ymSWgZm6ivo

Dompig admits there was sexual assault to charge Joran, & Kalpoes and they should be charged, BUT they changed the investigation!
p. 193 (Beth's book) - November 2, 2005 Dompig on MSNBC - Rita Cosby show stated "They are gulty as hell."
Then if you read his various accusations he has accused Beth for interfering in the investigation to place blame on her, he has made accusations that Natalee bought drugs, he has made accusations that Natalee died of an overdose,
he has made accusations that Natalee was buried in the sea, that she ran away, that Beth made her disappear to collect insurance money. He intentionally withheld Texas Equu Search & FBI divers from searches and he has made accusations that the answers are in the United States with the Mountain Brook teens. When the truth is it was Dompig, Dennis Jacobs, Karin Janssen, Jan van der Straaten and unscrupulous judges that allowed the investigation to turn into a circus and crime that the world is still watching and wondering why the DUTCH are so flagrantly standing by and allowing the illegal conduct of the government and judiciary to prolificate. While tourism dollars are sinking Aruba's economy and their only hope is to make deals with illegal entities to keep Aruba afloat.

In addition file not only defamation lawsuits against Dompig, but also American's Julia Renfro and Charles Croes for their part in the cover-up with false and malicious intent to willfully cover-up and slander Beth Holloway and her daughter Natalee Holloway, but also under the Extracts of the Espionage and Sabotage Acts  - which is basically treason act of the U.S. Code.


Pierce the Evil and bring Justice for Natalee.

Well, that is what I would do.

ribbit






Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: MumInOhio on January 08, 2008, 03:45:15 PM
Hawaiin looking and chunky  JAIME, Santos and I agree about Croes. We don't have Ruth's 302, but I have some quotes of interviews the MB students did and will look there.

Luis and Joshua popped up in his book, both at the beach and I believe as regulars at C&Cs. I think it's a PV of Deepaks that has Joran buing a guy a drink at C&Cs when he first gets there.

Also believe Jaime's PV has a different time that Joran calls him about going out, like afternoon, will check and post if I can find it. Sorry about all the I thinks! :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: MumInOhio on January 08, 2008, 03:51:44 PM
From Jaime's PV 6/17/2005


On May 29th 2005, between the hours of 16.00 and 19.00, I was called by Joran on my mobile phone with the phone number "xxxxxxx". Sometimes Joran calls me on the mobile phone of my sister, her name is "Maria del Pilar CARRASQUIXIA CACERES". Her calling name is "Pilar". The mobile phone number of Pilar is "xxxxxxx". The mobile phone number of Joran is "xxxxxxx". Joran had asked me whether I wanted to go out with him that night. He told me that a few American girls would go to "Carlos & Charlies" and whether I wanted to meet up with him there. According to me I had said to Joran that I would let him know later that day whether or not I would go out with him that night. I had also said to Joran that I had to work the next day. According to me I was phoned later that day by Joran again but I hadn't answered my mobile phone. Because it is the vacation now I temporarily work in "Caribbean Overseas". I work in the big Poolkasten. On May 29th 2005 I stayed home and slept. I went to bed at approximately 22.00 hours.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Blue Moon on January 08, 2008, 03:52:10 PM
No update from the Persistance?  Sunday appears to be the last time they were heard from.  Hope they are having better weather and maybe they have found something.  One can hope can't they?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Kermit on January 08, 2008, 03:55:31 PM
Again...I need help from some monkey...what time did it say that Natalee entered the casino?  What time did Joran come in?  What time was Paulus sitting at the table next to Natalee...I know...it isn't proven that it's him...just humor me. TIA

The timestamp is exactly 8:14 PM when the video was made of Jorna,PVDS and Natalee at the BJ table

Is there a timestamp when Natalee entered the casino?  Do we have that or is what I am talking about after her return trip from the bathroom or something?

Not too many days ago somebody posted that and discovered "proof" that the time on a photo had been changed. Can you search the last months posts?

I don't recall that discussion,was it on the front page? Looking back at the few seconds of footage they released it is just weird that Natalee is pointing in Joran's direction and in the same foortage the other MB student is pointing at PVDS. You can clearly see the timestamp on this video. More than 2 hours after Paulus said he left the casino.

(http://img402.imageshack.us/img402/8677/casino3op4.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)


Superior Court
January, 2007

The possible involvement of Paulus with that could then be deducted from the file with the official reports of witnesses, amongst which two people suggested a contact existed between Paulus and Natalee Holloway the night of her disappearance, and a taped report (that was given by the Prosecutor in her final note 1 to the Court).  The taped information and his declaration that  he picked up Joran and Natalee by the McDonalds Palm Beach and brought them to the Holiday Inn, are clearly understood by the Dept. of Justice, and could in the judgement of this Superior Court, be considered as an indication of the involvement of Paulus in the disappearance of Natalee Holloway.”


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: MumInOhio on January 08, 2008, 04:03:35 PM
Student quotes....alot of the links don't work any more, but some do.

http://scrux.com/natalee/studentquotes.htm

Greta interview:

http://scrux.com/natalee/mbinterview.htm

Will look for Deepak's PV in the morning.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Kermit on January 08, 2008, 04:08:32 PM
Is it Paulus van der Sloot?

BETH’S JUNE 1, 2005 STATEMENT WAS CHANGED:
“Beth said that one of the things that had gotten changed about her statements that was so upsetting to her was that she had given detailed descriptions of Paulus Van der Sloot with his name included several times in her statement and when she got it translated, she found out that her description had been changed to read only “the man with the glasses”.


HOLLOWAY TWITTY: Well, there was a phone call made. And it was just really having me refer to—you know, I‘d only mentioned the fact I had gotten from prosecuting attorney as far as the open line of credit, and that Joran is in his casino gambling, and I don‘t think there was ever a question that Joran and Paulus Van Der Sloot had been in that Excelsior Casino, and, particularly, on the night of the 29th where he and his father met Natalee.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9407728/



KIMBERLY GUILFOYLE’S SOURCES:
June 9, 2006

Kimberly Guilfoyle: What we do know is that Joran and the Kalpoe brothers were the last people seen with Natalee Holloway, which is the reason why they still remain to this day the main suspects in the case. As for Paulus, sources say he is the person next to Natalie in the casino. http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,198887,00.html


JOHN Q. KELLY
April 4, 2006

COSBY … John, first of all, is there a possibility that Paulus might have been talking to Natalee the night that she disappeared?

JOHN Q. KELLY, HOLLOWAY FAMILY ATTORNEY: Well, if you look at the surveillance video footage, it appears that he’s the one sitting directly next to her and tries to engage her in conversation a couple of times. And it’s sort of ironic that it’s his father who brought his underage son to a casino and left him there after he left, with access to his line of credit, to put this unfortunate chain of events in process.
http://msnbc.msn.com/id/12150698/

(http://img67.imageshack.us/img67/2159/paulusnexttonataleexi9.jpg)


Zoltan Zion blogspot this afternoon announcing that a "source" has confirmed that the person in the casino video is definitely Paulus van der Sloot.  Also confirming that Van Der Straaten was definitely at the party at the Sloots after Joran's release from his original detention.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2439.100

MANSUR: There have not been any change of opinion. People, including people in the casino say that is Paul.
(Dana Pretzer's radio show)





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Kermit on January 08, 2008, 04:09:39 PM
Hello everyone. I have been trying to think of something effective that can be done to help Beth keep the pressure on Aruba. Does anyone think this might be an effective tool?

If we had a good letter writer and an attorny to review the letter to assess liability, I wonder how effective it would be to write a letter to the major newspapers of each state basically to tell of Beth's treatment, the boycott, etc

My suggestion would be to turn the tables on Aruba and get a dream team and go to the top & cc Interpol:


At the direction of the President or the Attorney General, the FBI may use its statutory authority to investigate and arrest individuals for violating United States law, even if the FBI’s actions contravene customary international law. The President, acting through the Attorney General, has the inherent constitutional authority to deploy the FBI to investigate and arrest individuals for violating United States law, even if those actions contravene customary international law. Extraterritorial law enforcement activities that are authorized by domestic law are not barred even if they contravene unexecuted treaties or treaty provisions, such as Article 2(4) of the
United Nations Charter. An arrest that is inconsistent with international or foreign law does not violate the Fourth Amendment.

And I would include in that letter:

We read in Extracts of the Espionage and Sabotage Acts and other related federal criminal statutes: U.S. CODE, SECTION 1001, states that "Whoever, in any mater within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact, or makes any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or representations, or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any false, fictitious or fraudulent statement or entry, shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both


Now view this video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ymSWgZm6ivo

Dompig admits there was sexual assault to charge Joran, & Kalpoes and they should be charged, BUT they changed the investigation!
p. 193 (Beth's book) - November 2, 2005 Dompig on MSNBC - Rita Cosby show stated "They are gulty as hell."
Then if you read his various accusations he has accused Beth for interfering in the investigation to place blame on her, he has made accusations that Natalee bought drugs, he has made accusations that Natalee died of an overdose,
he has made accusations that Natalee was buried in the sea, that she ran away, that Beth made her disappear to collect insurance money. He intentionally withheld Texas Equu Search & FBI divers from searches and he has made accusations that the answers are in the United States with the Mountain Brook teens. When the truth is it was Dompig, Dennis Jacobs, Karin Janssen, Jan van der Straaten and unscrupulous judges that allowed the investigation to turn into a circus and crime that the world is still watching and wondering why the DUTCH are so flagrantly standing by and allowing the illegal conduct of the government and judiciary to prolificate. While tourism dollars are sinking Aruba's economy and their only hope is to make deals with illegal entities to keep Aruba afloat.

In addition file not only defamation lawsuits against Dompig, but also American's Julia Renfro and Charles Croes for their part in the cover-up with false and malicious intent to willfully cover-up and slander Beth Holloway and her daughter Natalee Holloway, but also under the Extracts of the Espionage and Sabotage Acts  - which is basically treason act of the U.S. Code.


Pierce the Evil and bring Justice for Natalee.

Well, that is what I would do.

ribbit







ART WOOD:The family of Natalee needs to put pressure on the US attorney in Birmingham to push the FBI to conduct an investigation after ALE close the case. We have a treaty that allows the FBI to pursue a violation of civil rights of an american citizen there.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: MumInOhio on January 08, 2008, 04:11:07 PM
O/T....Carolyn needs prayers and please light a candle.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 08, 2008, 04:21:09 PM
(that was given by the Prosecutor in her final note 1 to the Court)

Whats KJ'S excuse for holding on to this very important information and then presenting it in her final note to the court? Same excuse for letting the suspect go free for 10 days brfore they were arrested? Same excuse for not searching the entire Van Der Sloot residence?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 08, 2008, 04:28:05 PM
From Jaime's PV 6/17/2005


On May 29th 2005, between the hours of 16.00 and 19.00, I was called by Joran on my mobile phone with the phone number "xxxxxxx". Sometimes Joran calls me on the mobile phone of my sister, her name is "Maria del Pilar CARRASQUIXIA CACERES". Her calling name is "Pilar". The mobile phone number of Pilar is "xxxxxxx". The mobile phone number of Joran is "xxxxxxx". Joran had asked me whether I wanted to go out with him that night. He told me that a few American girls would go to "Carlos & Charlies" and whether I wanted to meet up with him there. According to me I had said to Joran that I would let him know later that day whether or not I would go out with him that night. I had also said to Joran that I had to work the next day. According to me I was phoned later that day by Joran again but I hadn't answered my mobile phone. Because it is the vacation now I temporarily work in "Caribbean Overseas". I work in the big Poolkasten. On May 29th 2005 I stayed home and slept. I went to bed at approximately 22.00 hours.




This is what I mean...Jamie was in bed at 10 and Joran called him at 11.  Wait!  I thought Paulus picked Joran up at 11?  Oh, I must be confused again...Jamie had to go to work but he was called by Joran between 4 and 6 PM that day.  Did he call Jaime right after he met Natalee on the beach?  Was this the earlier in the day that Lee spoke of? Did he tell Jaime he found his next victim...er...I mean target....uh...his new friend?  Did these girls mention to Joran that they would be in the casino that night too?  Hmmmmm.  We need to see those other 302's.  The phone logs should be able to clear this up....oh wait...they don't exist for this particular moment in time....or do they?   :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 08, 2008, 04:58:20 PM
From previous post by Kermit...snipped to save space...

Superior Court
January, 2007

The possible involvement of Paulus with that could then be deducted from the file with the official reports of witnesses, amongst which two people suggested a contact existed between Paulus and Natalee Holloway the night of her disappearance, and a taped report (that was given by the Prosecutor in her final note 1 to the Court).  The taped information and his declaration that  he picked up Joran and Natalee by the McDonalds Palm Beach and brought them to the Holiday Inn, are clearly understood by the Dept. of Justice, and could in the judgement of this Superior Court, be considered as an indication of the involvement of Paulus in the disappearance of Natalee Holloway.”



Since this appears to be on tape as having happened let's think about it.  It does however require us to forget some of what we think we know and what we want to believe...so open your mind for just a minute...let's think outside the KISS box for a moment.

Could this be a true statement made concerning Paulus picking up Joran and Natalee?  Could the Klapoes have really left Joran and Natalee on the beach just long enough for Paulus to come by and pick them up?  What was happening at the HI?  We know they didn't take her back to drop her off and then go home.  Not once does Paulus say he picked up both Natalee and Joran that I remember. So if this is true...where did Paulus take them?  To a party perhaps?  Maybe Natalee had begun to sober up just a little and had actually been on the beach with Joran just long enough to get picked up by daddy.  She would not be worried when he showed up to get them...after all, she had met him in the casino and knew he was Joran's father.  It's a trust thing, I know...but I am trying to think a little differently here.  So she gets in the car or jeep or whatever and off she goes.  What happened?  We know they did not go to the HI or do we?  Was there a party there?  Who knows? Maybe it was another place...a different hotel...a house...the Sloots?  If this is a true statement and they were picked up by Paulus...then when did Natalee die?  Is it true then, that the Kalpoes only saw her as being asleep or passed out in Joran's lap in the back of the car?  Satish asks how is the girl?  Had she gotten sick riding in the back seat and they stopped to let her throw up and she didn't get out in time and she threw up in the car?  Did Deepak leave them on the beach because she messed up the car?  Was she in such bad shape that by the time she was left on the beach with Joran that she died there?   Did Paulus then come to get them and help him get rid of Natalee?  I know Shango says they did not build sand castles...well standing on the side of the road waiting for a pick up is not being on the beach...so maybe that is what he meant.  Did Simian know about this tape when he asks about the phone call at 2 in the morning? Did Natalee get very ill between the time Joran was left at the beach by Deepak and the time Paulus arrived? It might have been about....what 15  minutes?  Why did the impound three cars?  The only one involved was Deepak's unless....unless...this statement is true about Paulus picking them up. Was Paulus even at home ?  I know I am rambling, but maybe it will jog someone's memory and something will surface. Maybe someone will remember reading something that I haven't.   I need to take a break...think about it.

Simian Says: June 23rd, 2005 at 3:05 pm
If you were asleep who answered your phone?

Simian Says: June 23rd, 2005 at 3:09 pm
You can’t remember answering a phone call at 2:00 in the morning? When the next day your son was picked up?

Simian Says: June 24th, 2005 at 3:31 pm
The father was confronted with evidence. Can’t confirm if it’s from the cars of the house. They needed this to make him talk.

Simian Says: June 24th, 2005 at 5:49 pm
The phone call to the father was made at 4:00 in the morning. No wonder he was late for school.

Simian Says:June 25th, 2005 at 6:47 pm
There are 3 vehicles.

Simian Says: June 25th, 2005 at 6:57 pm
The phone call made in the small hours.

Simian Says: June 25th, 2005 at 7:00 pm
The boy is biting his tongue. It is all chewed up, bloody and sore.

Simian Says: June 25th, 2005 at 7:28 pm
The father is trapped in a legal check mate.

The boy is mutilating his own tongue. He doesn’t want to let the old man down.

Simian Says: June 25th, 2005 at 7:36 pm
In the other car.

Simian Says: June 25th, 2005 at 7:41 pm
Kalpoes went home. Joran stayed behind. Somebody had to come get him.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Destiny on January 08, 2008, 05:05:56 PM
Good Morning!   Thanks Hotshot! Do you know anything about GVC house.... was it always yellow? Looking for a house that could be confused with Astrid's or maybe Lorenzo's. TIA


Did anyone notice anything when they opened that blog link that  Klaas posted last night, or is it just me? :shock:


 :smt017


Well, I guess it's just me...It showed my ISP, my internet company and what IE I had and then said ha ha!

Had it opened for a while before I went to read and it was a couple down ...went :shock:

Yeah, there are programs that do that.  The same thing happens at the RaceJunkies forum.  I'm not sure but my guess is only you can read it but it is surprising to see. :D

Klass this happened 5 miles from my house...it's so very sad...the whole community of Suches, in Union County, GA are grievly stricken by this horrible crime.

My home and business, are in Suches.  We take in trail hikers all the time at our small mnt. resort.

Prayers to the Family....Hell and damnation to the MONSTER!!!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Destiny on January 08, 2008, 05:07:41 PM
Good Morning!   Thanks Hotshot! Do you know anything about GVC house.... was it always yellow? Looking for a house that could be confused with Astrid's or maybe Lorenzo's. TIA


Did anyone notice anything when they opened that blog link that  Klaas posted last night, or is it just me? :shock:


 :smt017


Well, I guess it's just me...It showed my ISP, my internet company and what IE I had and then said ha ha!

Had it opened for a while before I went to read and it was a couple down ...went :shock:

Yeah, there are programs that do that.  The same thing happens at the RaceJunkies forum.  I'm not sure but my guess is only you can read it but it is surprising to see. :D

Klass this happened 5 miles from my house...it's so very sad...the whole community of Suches, in Union County, GA are grievly stricken by this horrible crime.

My home and business, are in Suches.  We take in trail hikers all the time at our small mnt. resort.

Prayers to the Family....Hell and damnation to the MONSTER!!!



SORRY I QUOTED/REPLIED TO THE WRONG POST!!!!

Mea Culpa...

Destiny


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 08, 2008, 05:10:48 PM
From previous post by Kermit...snipped to save space...

Superior Court
January, 2007

The possible involvement of Paulus with that could then be deducted from the file with the official reports of witnesses, amongst which two people suggested a contact existed between Paulus and Natalee Holloway the night of her disappearance, and a taped report (that was given by the Prosecutor in her final note 1 to the Court).  The taped information and his declaration that  he picked up Joran and Natalee by the McDonalds Palm Beach and brought them to the Holiday Inn, are clearly understood by the Dept. of Justice, and could in the judgement of this Superior Court, be considered as an indication of the involvement of Paulus in the disappearance of Natalee Holloway.”



Since this appears to be on tape as having happened let's think about it.  It does however require us to forget some of what we think we know and what we want to believe...so open your mind for just a minute...let's think outside the KISS box for a moment.

Could this be a true statement made concerning Paulus picking up Joran and Natalee?  Could the Klapoes have really left Joran and Natalee on the beach just long enough for Paulus to come by and pick them up?  What was happening at the HI?  We know they didn't take her back to drop her off and then go home.  Not once does Paulus say he picked up both Natalee and Joran that I remember. So if this is true...where did Paulus take them?  To a party perhaps?  Maybe Natalee had begun to sober up just a little and had actually been on the beach with Joran just long enough to get picked up by daddy.  She would not be worried when he showed up to get them...after all, she had met him in the casino and knew he was Joran's father.  It's a trust thing, I know...but I am trying to think a little differently here.  So she gets in the car or jeep or whatever and off she goes.  What happened?  We know they did not go to the HI or do we?  Was there a party there?  Who knows? Maybe it was another place...a different hotel...a house...the Sloots?  If this is a true statement and they were picked up by Paulus...then when did Natalee die?  Is it true then, that the Kalpoes only saw her as being asleep or passed out in Joran's lap in the back of the car?  Satish asks how is the girl?  Had she gotten sick riding in the back seat and they stopped to let her throw up and she didn't get out in time and she threw up in the car?  Did Deepak leave them on the beach because she messed up the car?  Was she in such bad shape that by the time she was left on the beach with Joran that she died there?   Did Paulus then come to get them and help him get rid of Natalee?  I know Shango says they did not build sand castles...well standing on the side of the road waiting for a pick up is not being on the beach...so maybe that is what he meant.  Did Simian know about this tape when he asks about the phone call at 2 in the morning? Did Natalee get very ill between the time Joran was left at the beach by Deepak and the time Paulus arrived? It might have been about....what 15  minutes?  Why did the impound three cars?  The only one involved was Deepak's unless....unless...this statement is true about Paulus picking them up. Was Paulus even at home ?  I know I am rambling, but maybe it will jog someone's memory and something will surface. Maybe someone will remember reading something that I haven't.   I need to take a break...think about it.

Simian Says: June 23rd, 2005 at 3:05 pm
If you were asleep who answered your phone?

Simian Says: June 23rd, 2005 at 3:09 pm
You can’t remember answering a phone call at 2:00 in the morning? When the next day your son was picked up?

Simian Says: June 24th, 2005 at 3:31 pm
The father was confronted with evidence. Can’t confirm if it’s from the cars of the house. They needed this to make him talk.

Simian Says: June 24th, 2005 at 5:49 pm
The phone call to the father was made at 4:00 in the morning. No wonder he was late for school.

Simian Says:June 25th, 2005 at 6:47 pm
There are 3 vehicles.

Simian Says: June 25th, 2005 at 6:57 pm
The phone call made in the small hours.

Simian Says: June 25th, 2005 at 7:00 pm
The boy is biting his tongue. It is all chewed up, bloody and sore.

Simian Says: June 25th, 2005 at 7:28 pm
The father is trapped in a legal check mate.

The boy is mutilating his own tongue. He doesn’t want to let the old man down.

Simian Says: June 25th, 2005 at 7:36 pm
In the other car.

Simian Says: June 25th, 2005 at 7:41 pm
Kalpoes went home. Joran stayed behind. Somebody had to come get him.




I believe PVDS did pick up Natalee and Joran at 4am but by that time Natalee was either already dead or almost.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Buckeye on January 08, 2008, 05:31:10 PM
I believe the US Attorney General can make a case for targeting American female tourists.  I believe it would be a hate crime by a gang...twenty times...Dompig's son also involved.  Interpol would be involved because of police corruption.  I believe Dopmig and the FBI are very well aware of this.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: dennisintn on January 08, 2008, 05:36:19 PM
[


[/quote]

I believe PVDS did pick up Natalee and Joran at 4am but by that time Natalee was either already dead or almost.
[/quote]
dr. bad said that if she died of alcohol poisoning/drug overdose or combination of both, death would not have occured for several hours after she lapsed into unconsciousness.
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Buckeye on January 08, 2008, 05:41:49 PM
Let's say you've known someone since you were little.  That someone gets motion sick, on the water and has never been on your boat (as stated in "the diaries").  Would you really invite that friend on the boat??  Why bother?

Joran lists everyone he has bumped into or called....except no mention of Sander....Koen yes...but no Sander....and no mention of a boat.

What made ALE ask Sander about Joran, related to that boat??  Who gave them the heads up??  Don't see a boat mentioned in any PV.  Yet, low and behold, when Sander is questioned about Joran and the boat, by golly he did invite the guy aboard that Sunday...how coincidental.

Now then, over two weeks of not notifying setar of a "stolen" phone (not lost), that someone could be using and racking up bills...Sander discloses he has discussed his phone issue with Freddy (the day after it was "stolen").

Is Sander a safe fall guy because of his age??  or...is he the boatman? hmmmmm


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: dennisintn on January 08, 2008, 05:46:35 PM
I believe the US Attorney General can make a case for targeting American female tourists.  I believe it would be a hate crime by a gang...twenty times...Dompig's son also involved.  Interpol would be involved because of police corruption.  I believe Dopmig and the FBI are very well aware of this.
this could be exactly the reason paulus and j2k is getting so much support and help from the privileged in power on the island.  it is definitely the kind of thing that would ruin their money train for years.  look how many of the power players have sons in this age range that could be implicated in this kind of thing.
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 08, 2008, 05:56:07 PM
 :2thinky: mmm...Ocean search site is quiet...no update since Sun. 4:30 pm. :scratch:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Buckeye on January 08, 2008, 05:58:57 PM
I believe the US Attorney General can make a case for targeting American female tourists.  I believe it would be a hate crime by a gang...twenty times...Dompig's son also involved.  Interpol would be involved because of police corruption.  I believe Dopmig and the FBI are very well aware of this.
this could be exactly the reason paulus and j2k is getting so much support and help from the privileged in power on the island.  it is definitely the kind of thing that would ruin their money train for years.  look how many of the power players have sons in this age range that could be implicated in this kind of thing.
dennisintn

 :smt045 :smt045 :smt045


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Buckeye on January 08, 2008, 06:00:51 PM
Lala and others looking for 302s etc.  This is a pretty easily accessible site.

Jonathan (Shizaru  sp?)'s site:

http://www.hollowaycase.com/archive/index.htm


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Magnolia on January 08, 2008, 06:10:29 PM
Let's say you've known someone since you were little.  That someone gets motion sick, on the water and has never been on your boat (as stated in "the diaries").  Would you really invite that friend on the boat??  Why bother?

Joran lists everyone he has bumped into or called....except no mention of Sander....Koen yes...but no Sander....and no mention of a boat.

What made ALE ask Sander about Joran, related to that boat??  Who gave them the heads up??  Don't see a boat mentioned in any PV.  Yet, low and behold, when Sander is questioned about Joran and the boat, by golly he did invite the guy aboard that Sunday...how coincidental.

Now then, over two weeks of not notifying setar of a "stolen" phone (not lost), that someone could be using and racking up bills...Sander discloses he has discussed his phone issue with Freddy (the day after it was "stolen").

Is Sander a safe fall guy because of his age??  or...is he the boatman? hmmmmm

I have always thought Sander drove the boat.  I think Koen was
too afraid.  It was said that Koen was in Florida, but I think he
was just scared.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 08, 2008, 06:11:44 PM
:2thinky: mmm...Ocean search site is quiet...no update since Sun. 4:30 pm. :scratch:

Agreed!! Whats going on??  :-? :-? :-?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Buckeye on January 08, 2008, 06:38:09 PM
Let's say you've known someone since you were little.  That someone gets motion sick, on the water and has never been on your boat (as stated in "the diaries").  Would you really invite that friend on the boat??  Why bother?

Joran lists everyone he has bumped into or called....except no mention of Sander....Koen yes...but no Sander....and no mention of a boat.

What made ALE ask Sander about Joran, related to that boat??  Who gave them the heads up??  Don't see a boat mentioned in any PV.  Yet, low and behold, when Sander is questioned about Joran and the boat, by golly he did invite the guy aboard that Sunday...how coincidental.

Now then, over two weeks of not notifying setar of a "stolen" phone (not lost), that someone could be using and racking up bills...Sander discloses he has discussed his phone issue with Freddy (the day after it was "stolen").

Is Sander a safe fall guy because of his age??  or...is he the boatman? hmmmmm

I have always thought Sander drove the boat.  I think Koen was
too afraid.  It was said that Koen was in Florida, but I think he
was just scared.

Maybe their parents were in Florida.........


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 08, 2008, 06:44:01 PM
I believe the US Attorney General can make a case for targeting American female tourists.  I believe it would be a hate crime by a gang...twenty times...Dompig's son also involved.  Interpol would be involved because of police corruption.  I believe Dopmig and the FBI are very well aware of this.
this could be exactly the reason paulus and j2k is getting so much support and help from the privileged in power on the island.  it is definitely the kind of thing that would ruin their money train for years.  look how many of the power players have sons in this age range that could be implicated in this kind of thing.
dennisintn

We know The Minister of Justice was caught red handed trying to pimp the 3 Dominican girls not to mention Minister Ramon Lee raping a woman and nothing being done. We heard about the young teenager who was raped and filmed and nothing was done there either. We know the story of A.Cormier who was drugged and Raped and nothing was ever done then as well. I am sure there are countless others that  reported crimes to the FBI or never came forward. My opinion is Natalee's murder was covered up because of the Influence of those involved but also the way the Aruban Govt covers up most everything that happens to Woman or Americans on that island.

All the son's were involved also play a role in all of this as well as the connections that Van Der Sloot,Wever and whoever else had that was involved. I truly believe if this was a rape and not a murder they would have still covered it up. Nothing bad can ever happen to a tourist as we have seen the last 12 years since the last American was murdered and since then Americans just dissapear. Their stats on Violent crimes/Rapes is laughable. I think they said in 2005 they had 1 murder and 6 rapes  :2doh: The heart of all of this is the Aruban Govt.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: ldstlou on January 08, 2008, 06:55:28 PM
where is CBB...I think she crossed over to the "dark Side" CBB...have you been hanging out with the refugees?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: ldstlou on January 08, 2008, 07:12:18 PM
where is CBB...I think she crossed over to the "dark Side" CBB...have you been hanging out with the refugees?

oops...CBB must not be in the cage..better tell my joke so she doesn't come back and read this later and think what the heck..lol
I was looking for my valentine avi and it was listed under idstlou instead of ldstlou...only the refugees call me idstlou..they write it Idstlou...just a little humor... :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: WhiskeyGirl on January 08, 2008, 07:13:19 PM
How many actually post at RU?  Is their population diminished?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 08, 2008, 07:32:03 PM
How many actually post at RU?  Is their population diminished?

Very few posting there now.  Actually, posting is down in all of the Natalee Holloway forums because there's so little news in the case.  Some forums have virtually closed. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: texasmom on January 08, 2008, 07:33:35 PM
OT

KIWI, I love your avatar!  I have two female shelties, like daughters to me.  Am I correct that the picture is a sheltie?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: AZSunny on January 08, 2008, 07:44:13 PM
I am also checking the Persistence site regularly with no updates.  My thoughts are that they have experienced a problem with the ship, or equipment, the seas are not being cooperative, they have shifted the search area, they have found something and Kyle has been asked not to post anything as yet.  Kyle is sea sick, computer not working...what else can it be?

The anticipation is killing me!  Prayers for all of them and for Natalee and her family. 

klaas, I noticed you haven't commented, are you aware of any developments, or have you just been asked to be mum?  Both? :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Kiwi on January 08, 2008, 07:46:22 PM
OT

KIWI, I love your avatar!  I have two female shelties, like daughters to me.  Am I correct that the picture is a sheltie?
Ya she is a sheltie, and just a pup!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Magnolia on January 08, 2008, 07:54:51 PM
Let's say you've known someone since you were little.  That someone gets motion sick, on the water and has never been on your boat (as stated in "the diaries").  Would you really invite that friend on the boat??  Why bother?

Joran lists everyone he has bumped into or called....except no mention of Sander....Koen yes...but no Sander....and no mention of a boat.

What made ALE ask Sander about Joran, related to that boat??  Who gave them the heads up??  Don't see a boat mentioned in any PV.  Yet, low and behold, when Sander is questioned about Joran and the boat, by golly he did invite the guy aboard that Sunday...how coincidental.

Now then, over two weeks of not notifying setar of a "stolen" phone (not lost), that someone could be using and racking up bills...Sander discloses he has discussed his phone issue with Freddy (the day after it was "stolen").

Is Sander a safe fall guy because of his age??  or...is he the boatman? hmmmmm

I have always thought Sander drove the boat.  I think Koen was
too afraid.  It was said that Koen was in Florida, but I think he
was just scared.

Maybe their parents were in Florida.........

That makes good sense!  If Joran knew the parents were gone, he would not
have hesitated to call the brothers for assistance.  If that is the case, I would
guess that they did their dirty work in the early morning hours after Paulus
picked him up at 4:00 AM.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: texasmom on January 08, 2008, 07:55:14 PM
OT

KIWI, I love your avatar!  I have two female shelties, like daughters to me.  Am I correct that the picture is a sheltie?
Ya she is a sheltie, and just a pup!

Well she is beautiful!  I hope she gives as much love and joy to your life as mine do.  I bought Scout for my son's birthday when she was 5 weeks old, we acquired her sister Prissy when they were both a year old.  Someone had bought her and brought her back; we believe she was mistreated, she was so skiddish that we actually lost her twice once for over a month and we were devastated but eventually found her again.  She's fine now after about a year of all the love we could give her.  They guard my every movement....I have some pics on my computer at work and I need an avatar also so I will send one home tomorrow and try to add it so you can see them.  They are great companions.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Magnolia on January 08, 2008, 07:58:03 PM
I am also checking the Persistence site regularly with no updates.  My thoughts are that they have experienced a problem with the ship, or equipment, the seas are not being cooperative, they have shifted the search area, they have found something and Kyle has been asked not to post anything as yet.  Kyle is sea sick, computer not working...what else can it be?

The anticipation is killing me!  Prayers for all of them and for Natalee and her family. 

klaas, I noticed you haven't commented, are you aware of any developments, or have you just been asked to be mum?  Both? :wink:

Not Klaas, but I have thought printed Kyle's last post and noticed tossed
the lines and figured he was sea sick and just hasn't felt like posting.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 08, 2008, 08:00:05 PM
I am also checking the Persistence site regularly with no updates.  My thoughts are that they have experienced a problem with the ship, or equipment, the seas are not being cooperative, they have shifted the search area, they have found something and Kyle has been asked not to post anything as yet.  Kyle is sea sick, computer not working...what else can it be?

The anticipation is killing me!  Prayers for all of them and for Natalee and her family. 

klaas, I noticed you haven't commented, are you aware of any developments, or have you just been asked to be mum?  Both? :wink:

No, I haven't heard anything either.  I'm trying to get ahold of Red and see if he's heard anything.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: robots on January 08, 2008, 08:01:48 PM
i love shelties

they are really smart, i have had several of them and they have all been good
i have 1 now.  :P


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: robots on January 08, 2008, 08:03:40 PM
JORAN is the DEVIL


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: AZSunny on January 08, 2008, 08:05:19 PM
I am also checking the Persistence site regularly with no updates.  My thoughts are that they have experienced a problem with the ship, or equipment, the seas are not being cooperative, they have shifted the search area, they have found something and Kyle has been asked not to post anything as yet.  Kyle is sea sick, computer not working...what else can it be?

The anticipation is killing me!  Prayers for all of them and for Natalee and her family. 

klaas, I noticed you haven't commented, are you aware of any developments, or have you just been asked to be mum?  Both? :wink:

Not Klaas, but I have thought printed Kyle's last post and noticed tossed
the lines and figured he was sea sick and just hasn't felt like posting.

No, tossed the lines is a nautical phrase for  untieing the ship, and leaving the dock and setting sail. You untie the boat and toss the lines.  He may be sea sick as well though!  With those high rolling seas, everyone is no doubt.  I wonder how the date line crew is doing?? :smt088


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: texasmom on January 08, 2008, 08:07:27 PM
AZSunny
I'm right here with you, a nervous wreck; I hardly slept at all last night.  I'm just so anxious about it all.  I know they are all probably exhausted and or sick from all the being tossed about.  I'm hoping they are quiet because of developments in the search that they don't want out, as you said, it can't hurt to HOPE!  I even tried to add a little humor last night in Robots absence.... :smt090


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: AZSunny on January 08, 2008, 08:09:47 PM
Here is an earlier quote from Kyle...

Now a routine, the crew toss the lines and we depart. Leaving the dock past the ..... The crew diligently toss the lines and she's free of the dock. ...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: AZSunny on January 08, 2008, 08:12:17 PM
I do hope that they haven't just ended it without success, but that is a possiblity as well.  I haven't slept more than 7 hours in 2 days.  I can't get it off my mind. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: texasmom on January 08, 2008, 08:18:56 PM
i love shelties

they are really smart, i have had several of them and they have all been good
i have 1 now.  :P

Hi Robots!  These are our first shelties, we've had many, many dogs and have others now also but Scout and Prissy rule the roost right now.  We have an older lab named Blondie and they are so jealous of her.  She's outside during the day and comes in at night and they still bark at her and chase her to her room....it's funny.  If it weren't for Blondie's motor-tail she would be an inside dog also but she can do some damage with that tail!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 08, 2008, 08:19:54 PM
I know some have said even if the Persistence doesn't find anything this will eliminate one avenue of thought as to Natalee being in the ocean.   If they do  not search around the entire island how is that possible to say?  If she isn't found I don't think any possibility is eliminated.  Guess I don't see it like everyone else.   :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 08, 2008, 08:21:19 PM
Klaas

Is it possible to have the Christmas corsage removed from Ducky's neck and ... a Valentine heart put in its place.

I appreciate if the star remained.  You see ... I climb on Ducky's back each night after I we leave the cage and ... he takes me to Never Never Land.  He will not lose the way ... the star will guide him.  My worst nightmare ... we would end up Heaven knows where and ...  never make our way back to the cage in the morning.

Thanks

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: robots on January 08, 2008, 08:25:20 PM
after they killed her, they left her alone. but it wasnt on the beach
it was somewhere near water, like a small pond. then the cleaner uppers came to move her....

this type of thing was planned, not in the sense that THIS specific time it would happen but they knew if you drug someone this could always be a possibility

this was planned in that sense

 :-x :-x :-x :-x :-x


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 08, 2008, 08:27:59 PM
FYI - According to LindaK at BFN the snorkeling trip the MB kids went on was with DePalm Tours.  Here is a photo of the boat they use for the snorkeling excursions:

http://www.depalm.com/

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/DePalm.jpg)

So if this is true, it would have nothing to do with the Octopus.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 08, 2008, 08:29:40 PM
Klaas

Is it possible to have the Christmas corsage removed from Ducky's neck and ... a Valentine heart put in its place.

I appreciate if the star remained.  You see ... I climb on Ducky's back each night after I we leave the cage and ... he takes me to Never Never Land.  He will not lose the way ... the star will guide him.  My worst nightmare ... we would end up Heaven knows where and ...  never make our way back to the cage in the morning.

Thanks

Janet

Sure  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Kiwi on January 08, 2008, 08:31:31 PM
I have a suggestion for anyone still monitoring from Aruba. If you really want to solve this, run all the cell records for the entire island from 9:00 pm Sunday night to Tuesday 6:00 am. That should only involve a few thousand calls for the whole island. Then you will need to filter out calls not related to the case. Thats a little tricky since you need to include any calls that seem unrelated but have names on the investigation lists. Example, if Paulus called a gardener or a minister or another judge in that time period, then it stays in the pool of numbers and locations to investigate. They could have used a cell phone from a friend, so you need to list all of those individuals. Any thing in the first 12 hours is the most important. You need to account for off shore and remote locations. Just map it out and take your time. This will work unless someone has erased the evidence for that period of time. Of course that person now becomes a lead. Any thing before Tuesday 6:00 am is before there was report of a possible crime. No one should be worried about just using the phone, unless you talked to J2KPA during that time. After filtering out tourists and locals, your GPS hits will probably be 30 to 40.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Kiwi on January 08, 2008, 08:42:11 PM
Time for Kiwi to go home and feed the real Kiwi.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 08, 2008, 08:52:26 PM
I know some have said even if the Persistence doesn't find anything this will eliminate one avenue of thought as to Natalee being in the ocean.   If they do  not search around the entire island how is that possible to say?  If she isn't found I don't think any possibility is eliminated.  Guess I don't see it like everyone else.   :roll:

We know a speed boat can get to Venezuela in less than a hour and thats 18 miles out,so they could have disposed Natalee quickly almost anywhere. It's impossible to search that entire ocean around Aruba. It would take months and tens of millions just to cover 5 miles around half of the island and thats not going to happen. The Persistence was mostly searching the most logical theories and tips that they received and that was a 22sq mile area on the northern tip of the island. Sounded like they started a new area/grid but High seas impeded the efforts a bit.

Last time we heard from Kyle it sounded like the crew was weathered and maybe even a bit frustrated and tired. The search can't go on forever and I am hoping and praying they found her. If they found nothing then it would be safe to say Natalee wasnt buried in a crab trap in that area that they covered and thats all. The task at hand was enormous unless she was placed in a crab trap in that specific area they searched and even finding that would be absolutely amazing. Even if she was in a barrel in that 22 sq mile area I am not sure they would see it. Either way the Persistence crew deserves  huge praise for trying and sacrificing there Holidays as well as bankrolling the entire search.

I wonder what Paul and Anita were saying privately as they watched the Persistence off shore from the beach?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 08, 2008, 08:57:50 PM
How long had the Gottenbos lived in Aruba? Am I right they just sold their house and moved to Georgia?  I know Sander was seen in that photo with the money in his hand flashing it like it was something grand.  That seemed more like a "pimp" thing to do.  Does anyone else think that Sander is much more outgoing and more likely to be involved in something shady with Joran than Koen?  Then again, I have to wonder if the Hawaiian looking guy I was talking about today was Koen.  If it was Koen, why wasn't he on that boat with Sander?  They just left him home alone and went to Florida?  WTH?  Was Koen not in school too?  They both were home and who knows where the parents were. Just a little FYI here....Koen was questioned at the same time as Sander on June 16...for the Simian watchers...Clyde Burke questioned Sander. Between these two statements both Freddy and Satish were questioned.  I don't think we have Satish's PV.  Then on June 17 Clyde Burke questioned Sander again...he had more questions.  How did he come by these questions?  What did Freddy and Satish say in between to their interrogators? Also on June 17 they question Freddy again and Steve Croes and Koen again and last but not least they question Jaime after 1:00 pm that day.  Jaime said he went to bed at 10:00 PM the night in question. Wait!  Didn't Joran say he called him after he talked to his daddy?  No phone records...no evidence. If the Gottenbos boat was used....Sander knew about it or he drove it.  I think he drove it...he would not loan it to Joran...but would he loan it to Paulus? Or Freddy? Joran knew the boat was available...he had a means of transportation. Sander's phone was lost in all the chaos.  But the most important thing here is Simian posted his first comment on the FP of SM at 5:08 PM the same day. MOO




Sander's 6/17 PV...notice he did not mention any of this the day before...

On your question about how the conversation went, I will tell you the following;
The conversation went that I asked him if he wanted to go out on my fathers boat.

He said that he could not go because he was going to play poker at the Holiday Inn. There is tournament each Sunday in aforementioned hotel and Joran participates almost each week in that tournament.

On your question what kind of boat my father has, I will explain to you the following:
 It is a speedboat, of the make "Sea Pro".

On your question if Joran had been on our boat before, I will explain to you the following:
Joran has never been on our boat and has also never with our dangers. (?)

On your question if I had spoken on May 29, 2005 with Joran by means of the computer, I will explain you the following:
I do not remember myself if I had spoken to him by means of the computer. If he had been online then it would be possible.

On your question if I had contact on May 30, 2005 with Joran, I will explain to you the following:
I truly cannot remember myself if I had spoke with him.

I do not think by telephone for certain because my telephone was stolen that day at school. I think that I had no contact with Joran by means of the computer.

On your question if I had contact with Joran on May 31, 2005, I will explain to you the following:
I did not have contact with Joran on 31 May 2005. I did, however, have telephone contact with Freddy. The conversation went concerning my telephone that was stolen. The first time that I saw him was on Wednesday, therefore June 1, 2005.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: private eye on January 08, 2008, 09:00:12 PM
I know some have said even if the Persistence doesn't find anything this will eliminate one avenue of thought as to Natalee being in the ocean.   If they do  not search around the entire island how is that possible to say?  If she isn't found I don't think any possibility is eliminated.  Guess I don't see it like everyone else.   :roll:

We know a speed boat can get to Venezuela in less than a hour and thats 18 miles out,so it's impossible to search that entire ocean around Aruba. It would take months and tens of millions just to cover 5 miles around the majority of the island and thats not going to happen. The Persistence was mostly searching the most logical theories and tips that they received and that was a 22sq mile area on the northern tip of the island. Sounded like they started a new area/grid but High seas impeded the efforts a bit.

Last time we heard from Kyle it sounded like the crew was weathered and maybe even a bit frustrated and tired. The search can't go on forever and I am hoping and praying they found her. If they found nothing then it would be safe to say Natalee wasnt buried in a crab trap in that area that they covered and thats all. The task at hand was enormous unless she was placed in a crab trap in that specific area they searched and even finding that would be absolutely amazing. Either way the Persistence crew deserves  huge praise for trying and sacrificing there Holidays as well as bankrolling the entire search.

I wonder what Paul and Anita were saying privately as they watched the Persistence off shore from the beach?

"Why oh why can't they just let it go?"

And the Monkeys say "In your dream maybe, but not in this life. No not until Joran and Co are all tightly tucked in their warm beds at the KIA Institute for problem children!"


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 08, 2008, 09:05:48 PM
Klaas

Is it possible to have the Christmas corsage removed from Ducky's neck and ... a Valentine heart put in its place.

I appreciate if the star remained.  You see ... I climb on Ducky's back each night after I we leave the cage and ... he takes me to Never Never Land.  He will not lose the way ... the star will guide him.  My worst nightmare ... we would end up Heaven knows where and ...  never make our way back to the cage in the morning.

Thanks

Janet

Sure  :wink:

Klaas ... I changed my mind.   :roll:

Could I please have flower like yours rather than the Valentine ... maybe a little smaller.

Thanks

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 08, 2008, 09:06:28 PM
(http://img246.imageshack.us/img246/8458/highseassy9.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)

Kyle told us on the 4th and 5th that the ocean conditions were rough but they were able to work at 1/2 the pace but it was hard on the crew. Let's all pray the search hasn't ended.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: memphis on January 08, 2008, 09:07:30 PM
137 Guests, 17 Users
Users active in past 15 minutes:
memphis, SunnyinTX, crazybabyborg, texasmom, *******, bleachedblack, Tamikosmom, bc73, KarmaRoundUp, greeneyedlady, private eye, klaasend, 2NJSons_Mom, Lala'sMom, sleddogs, BUCKSHOT, Helen Back

137 Guests? Wow!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 08, 2008, 09:11:07 PM
Sure Janet - I'll fix you up in a bit and change it for you.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: memphis on January 08, 2008, 09:13:15 PM
... Then again, I have to wonder if the Hawaiian looking guy I was talking about today was Koen... 

I'm just butting in here and haven't followed closely, but having lived in Hawaii and having been asked if I was Hawaiian too many times to count, I don't think most would describe Koen as Hawaiian.  :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 08, 2008, 09:17:58 PM
... Then again, I have to wonder if the Hawaiian looking guy I was talking about today was Koen...

I'm just butting in here and haven't followed closely, but having lived in Hawaii and having been asked if I was Hawaiian too many times to count, I don't think most would describe Koen as Hawaiian.  :cool:

The only person I think look's similar to a Hawaain is Andre Santo's who was born in Brazil. That's who I think the MB girls were talking about.MO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 08, 2008, 09:22:44 PM
Sure Janet - I'll fix you up in a bit and change it for you.

I am sorry to be such a pain.

Klaas ... this is when you say ... "No problem Janet ... you are not a pain".   :lol:

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: memphis on January 08, 2008, 09:24:05 PM
IMO, that's a hard one, *******. What is Hawaiian looking to one person may not be to another. But, I don't think the blond boy would be the one. The Santos kid is a good possbility.

Having lived there, I would say Steve Croes could pass easily as Samoan (there are many in Hawaii), but only someone who had lived there would see him that way.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 08, 2008, 09:31:36 PM
IMO, that's a hard one, *******. What is Hawaiian looking to one person may not be to another. But, I don't think the blond boy would be the one. The Santos kid is a good possbility.

Having lived there, I would say Steve Croes could pass easily as Samoan (there are many in Hawaii), but only someone who had lived there would see him that way.



Well the 302 says fat Chinese or Hawaiian looking...if I knew how to post things side by side it would be interesting to look at them and see which might fit.  Koen, Jaime, Steve, Andre, and any of Joran's other friends.  He did come to talk to Joran...so she must have seem him for a few seconds at least...obviously she didn't pay real good attention to him but she did mention him as talking to Joran.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: memphis on January 08, 2008, 09:39:36 PM
IMO, that's a hard one, *******. What is Hawaiian looking to one person may not be to another. But, I don't think the blond boy would be the one. The Santos kid is a good possbility.

Having lived there, I would say Steve Croes could pass easily as Samoan (there are many in Hawaii), but only someone who had lived there would see him that way.



Well the 302 says fat Chinese or Hawaiian looking...if I knew how to post things side by side it would be interesting to look at them and see which might fit.  Koen, Jaime, Steve, Andre, and any of Joran's other friends.  He did come to talk to Joran...so she must have seem him for a few seconds at least...obviously she didn't pay real good attention to him but she did mention him as talking to Joran.

Lalas, I was just looking at their pictures. Of all the choices, I would say cross off Koen. I just don't think he could be described as Chinese or Hawaiian. Just didn't want you to go down a wrong path.

Was this in Lee's pv? If I think like an MB girl, I would probably agree with ******* and go with Andre. Especially after looking at his sister, Alessandra's pic.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 08, 2008, 09:40:34 PM
IMO, that's a hard one, *******. What is Hawaiian looking to one person may not be to another. But, I don't think the blond boy would be the one. The Santos kid is a good possbility.

Having lived there, I would say Steve Croes could pass easily as Samoan (there are many in Hawaii), but only someone who had lived there would see him that way.



Well the 302 says fat Chinese or Hawaiian looking...if I knew how to post things side by side it would be interesting to look at them and see which might fit.  Koen, Jaime, Steve, Andre, and any of Joran's other friends.  He did come to talk to Joran...so she must have seem him for a few seconds at least...obviously she didn't pay real good attention to him but she did mention him as talking to Joran.

To me, the Chinese or Hawaiian looking guy could only be Andre dos Santos.  Andre was known to gamble with Joran.  That's who I would bet it is.  Just my opinion.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 08, 2008, 09:40:35 PM
We are going on 3 days now since we last heard from Kyle :( He hasn't updated the blog or has he updated the comments. Haven't seen him on SM either,He may have caught a flight back home and is resting? I would imagine we will hear soon if the search is done or whats goin on? Hopefully they are all safe and in good health.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 08, 2008, 09:44:20 PM
Regarding the Persistence - maybe Dateline has them busy filming?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: memphis on January 08, 2008, 09:45:33 PM
We are going on 3 days now since we last heard from Kyle :( He hasn't updated the blog or has he updated the comments. Haven't seen him on SM either,He may have caught a flight back home and is resting? I would imagine we will hear soon if the search is done or whats goin on? Hopefully they are all safe and in good health.

Yes, I suspect that's why so many are checking in - hoping for some word from the search.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: AZSunny on January 08, 2008, 09:47:27 PM
We are going on 3 days now since we last heard from Kyle :( He hasn't updated the blog or has he updated the comments. Haven't seen him on SM either,He may have caught a flight back home and is resting? I would imagine we will hear soon if the search is done or whats goin on? Hopefully they are all safe and in good health.

[The purpose of this blog is to give an inside look into the search for Natalee Holloway, offshore Aruba, Dec-2007. All writings are from a geophysical engineer and marine geologist on board the search vessel R/V Persistence. All quotes are direct quotes. All information in this site is reviewed for content and accuracy. This site will be updated daily until the search is terminated/color]

My guess is that the search has ended after one month.  I hope I am wrong, but it is certainly understandable.  I am hopeful that they had some findings. Prayers as always regardless of outcome.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 08, 2008, 09:51:35 PM
Whatever the outcome ... the crew of the Persistence have spoken loud and clear to the "powers that be" in the coverup into the disappearance of Natalee Holloway ... AMERICA DOES NOT FORSAKE HER OWN!

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 08, 2008, 09:54:25 PM
Whatever the outcome ... the crew of the Persistence have spoken loud and clear to the "powers that be" in the coverup into the disappearance of Natalee Holloway ... AMERICA DOES NOT FORSAKE HER OWN!

Janet

I agree Janet and I also don't think we should assume the search is over.  Let's just wait until we hear something either from Tim Miller or Kyle.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on January 08, 2008, 09:55:42 PM
Hi folks..

Everyone else does this.. so I am too.
Light a candle for Matthew Wilson in missing persons thread.  :(


http://www.gratefulness.org/candles/candles.cfm?l=eng&gi=MattW

 Have a great night.  :) Sorry I barged in. 

Hugs to Nemo and CP   :smt052



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 08, 2008, 09:56:52 PM
Klaas ... Ducky and I thank you very much for our Valentine flower.  :)

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 08, 2008, 09:58:40 PM
Hi folks..

Everyone else does this.. so I am too.
Light a candle for Matthew Wilson in missing persons thread.  :(


http://www.gratefulness.org/candles/candles.cfm?l=eng&gi=MattW

 Have a great night.  :) Sorry I barged in. 

Hugs to Nemo and CP   :smt052



Hi Angie.  I miss ya.  I hope you had a good day.

Hugs

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 08, 2008, 09:59:25 PM
I see CP405 out there lurking...hello! :smt006 :smt006. 

Angie, thanks for hugging Nemo...I miss his sweet little face.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 08, 2008, 10:01:02 PM
Whatever the outcome ... the crew of the Persistence have spoken loud and clear to the "powers that be" in the coverup into the disappearance of Natalee Holloway ... AMERICA DOES NOT FORSAKE HER OWN!

Janet

I agree Janet and I also don't think we should assume the search is over.   Let's just wait until we hear something either from Tim Miller or Kyle.

I agree.  I waiting anxiously for word from them.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: dennisintn on January 08, 2008, 10:08:27 PM

47,000 people have not accessed persistence blog.  think interest in natalee holloway has faded?
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: cp405 on January 08, 2008, 10:09:37 PM
I see CP405 out there lurking...hello! :smt006 :smt006. 

Angie, thanks for hugging Nemo...I miss his sweet little face.

Hi, (waving)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 08, 2008, 10:17:24 PM
I see CP405 out there lurking...hello! :smt006 :smt006. 

Angie, thanks for hugging Nemo...I miss his sweet little face.

Hi, (waving)

There's Nemo!  Hi girl...miss you.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Port Valerie on January 08, 2008, 10:21:54 PM

47,000 people have not accessed persistence blog.  think interest in natalee holloway has faded?
dennisintn

You must mean now. Right?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: sharon on January 08, 2008, 10:22:25 PM
Whatever the outcome ... the crew of the Persistence have spoken loud and clear to the "powers that be" in the coverup into the disappearance of Natalee Holloway ... AMERICA DOES NOT FORSAKE HER OWN!

Janet

I agree Janet and I also don't think we should assume the search is over.  Let's just wait until we hear something either from Tim Miller or Kyle.

I agree, klaas. I was thinking that we would have heard something if the search was over. Those side to side swells are difficult for the thoughest of sailors. My thoughts and prayers and thanks are with the entire crew.

I think it's funny that 'Glenda' thinks there is anyone left who gives a rats a$$ what she says  :lol: A bit delusional I would say. She actually BELIEVES her own hype. :lol: I guess you can take the skank out of the rat.....

Goodnight monkeys. I'll never give up until Beth says so.


AVOID ARUBA AS IF YOUR LIFE DEPENDS ON IT -- IT DOES
Justice for Natalee


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Icehawk on January 08, 2008, 10:24:07 PM

Hello everyone. Is there any new's from the Persistence yet?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Port Valerie on January 08, 2008, 10:25:25 PM

Hello everyone. Is there any new's from the Persistence yet?

That's what I'm looking for too.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 08, 2008, 10:25:37 PM

Hello everyone. Is there any new's from the Persistence yet?

No, nothing in a couple days.  We are all wondering what's up.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: dennisintn on January 08, 2008, 10:34:45 PM

47,000 people have not accessed persistence blog.  think interest in natalee holloway has faded?
dennisintn

You must mean now. Right?
lol, i meant "now".  the total is now 47,l00. climbing by the minute.
dennisintn  (also known as fumble fingers)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Port Valerie on January 08, 2008, 10:52:02 PM

47,000 people have not accessed persistence blog.  think interest in natalee holloway has faded?
dennisintn

You must mean now. Right?
lol, i meant "now".  the total is now 47,l00. climbing by the minute.
dennisintn  (also known as fumble fingers)

Thank you. Interest has not -- negative, nanner, nanner -- faded.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: downloadingdaddy on January 08, 2008, 10:52:47 PM

Hello everyone. Is there any new's from the Persistence yet?


That's why I keep checking in many times a day lately


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 08, 2008, 11:04:54 PM
I am still wondering who was arrested June 11th at 6AM. The first article says Freddy was being held since June 9th..Unless that is incorrect,someone else was arrested on June 11th 2005 at 6AM after the Confession and leading them to the body..etc.

ORANJESTAD, Aruba -- Satish and Deepak Kalpoe, the two Surinamese brothers previously detained in the Natalee Holloway case, have been re-arrested on suspicion of premeditated rape and murder, Aruban government officials said Friday. A third person was also detained.

Prosecutor's office spokeswoman Mariaine Croes told FOX News that the third person was a man known as "Freddy" or "F.A.," said to be a friend of Joran van der Sloot, who has been held in the case since June 9.

It was unclear if the third arrest was related to the Holloway case.

"Freddy" has been held since June 9?
http://freedomeden.blogspot.com/2005/08/more-from-aruba.html
-----------------------------------------------
6AM Arrest on June 11th 2005
Police investigating the disappearance of an Alabama honors student in Aruba arrested a man at dawn Saturday, hours after one of three young men already in custody admitted "something bad happened" to the woman after they took her to the beach.
    It was unclear if the 6 a.m. arrest was related to the admission. The same team of officers who arrested five others in the case during the past week went to a home just outside Oranjestad, the capital, and came out with a handcuffed man who looked to be in his 20s.

    Saturday morning, police refused to comment on the arrest or say if they had discovered anything overnight that solved the mystery of what happened to Natalee Holloway, 18, who was last seen in the early hours of May 30.

    Late Friday, Deputy Police Commissioner Gerold Dompig told The Associated Press that the man who made the statement was leading police to the scene. He refused to identify which of the three young men who took her to a beach the night she went missing made the statement.

http://forum.fok.nl/topic/710730/2/50


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: kkate on January 08, 2008, 11:06:38 PM

Hello everyone. Is there any new's from the Persistence yet?


That's why I keep checking in many times a day lately

There are many hoping & praying for their safety & success.
I've got everything crossed - even my eyes  :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 08, 2008, 11:19:32 PM

Hello everyone. Is there any new's from the Persistence yet?


That's why I keep checking in many times a day lately

There are many hoping & praying for their safety & success.
I've got everything crossed - even my eyes  :lol:

kkate, lol   :lol:  I blinked my eyes and you changed  :lol: :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 08, 2008, 11:28:50 PM
What a bunch of BS! This whole "Dutch" Investiagtion stinks!!!!!

(http://img339.imageshack.us/img339/1913/hollandtj8.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: private eye on January 08, 2008, 11:30:36 PM
We are going on 3 days now since we last heard from Kyle :( He hasn't updated the blog or has he updated the comments. Haven't seen him on SM either,He may have caught a flight back home and is resting? I would imagine we will hear soon if the search is done or whats goin on? Hopefully they are all safe and in good health.


From what I have heard, they are definitely still searching.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 08, 2008, 11:32:34 PM
(http://img526.imageshack.us/img526/1433/day23wi7.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)

10/26/2005
This is the mysterious cement block found by EquuSearch divers.

I wish I were a certified diver. But without those skills, I have to stay on the boat while the pros slip on their scuba gear. Two divers head to the ocean floor to investigate the suspicious object. As hard as I try, I can't see anything 40 feet down, so I just follow their air bubbles as they break on the surface. They are gone for about 10 minutes. Finally, back to the surface. It is NOT a fishing cage. It is a large cement block. But the divers say it is suspiciously out of place.

The cement block could be a boat mooring. That sounds like a logical explanation to me, since lots of boats are sporadically moored in this area of the harbor. But the divers say the cement block has nearly no marine growth, indicating that it is brand new. And it has no hooks to moor a boat. I think maybe it just flipped over when it was dropped into the sea and the hooks are on the underside. But the EquuSearch team wants to determine if they need to bring this block to the surface for further investigation.

Now we're on a fact finding mission. The divers check out the moorings of several nearby boats to see if they all look the same. They find one that's similar, but nothing that's identical to the block we just found. So the EquuSearch volunteers mark the spot for further investigation. Then it's back to shore.

I know we're on our way to meet Dave Holloway back on the dock. I think to myself "I wish we had good news to share." Then I think about the reality of that statement. Other than finding out that his daughter is alive and well, what is "good news" for Dave Holloway? Good news is not what we're looking for in the ocean. I was looking for closure today – closure for a father has accepted the painful reality that his daughter may never come home alive.

Dave meets us on shore with his usual optimistic smile. I don't know how he does it. I know it helps to be with Tim Miller. Tim reminds us all that it was another successful day, pointing out that we cleared several more square miles on the map. Tim says "We have a better idea of where we won't find Natalee. Tomorrow is another day."

Source: http://www.amw.com/features/feature_story_detail.cfm?id=832


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: hotping on January 08, 2008, 11:32:41 PM
What a bunch of BS! This whole "Dutch" Investiagtion stinks!!!!!

(http://img339.imageshack.us/img339/1913/hollandtj8.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)

That's putting it mildly *******! It is a complete and total joke....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: casa on January 08, 2008, 11:33:28 PM

Hello everyone. Is there any new's from the Persistence yet?


That's why I keep checking in many times a day lately

There are many hoping & praying for their safety & success.
I've got everything crossed - even my eyes  :lol:

kkate, lol   :lol:  I blinked my eyes and you changed  :lol: :lol:

Klaas, I almost didn't recognize you without your cage!





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 08, 2008, 11:33:55 PM
We are going on 3 days now since we last heard from Kyle :( He hasn't updated the blog or has he updated the comments. Haven't seen him on SM either,He may have caught a flight back home and is resting? I would imagine we will hear soon if the search is done or whats goin on? Hopefully they are all safe and in good health.


From what I have heard, they are definitely still searching.

Thats good news! :)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on January 08, 2008, 11:38:00 PM
We are going on 3 days now since we last heard from Kyle :( He hasn't updated the blog or has he updated the comments. Haven't seen him on SM either,He may have caught a flight back home and is resting? I would imagine we will hear soon if the search is done or whats goin on? Hopefully they are all safe and in good health.


From what I have heard, they are definitely still searching.
[/quote

 I don't doubt that for a minute ! Prayers for you all..
Hug the other half for me.. k?   :cool:
 I have a good feeling about this all.. I dont post much.. trying to get my life in order somewhat... BUT  do have a gret feeling.. and feel answers are right around the corner.    HUGS


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on January 08, 2008, 11:39:37 PM
We are going on 3 days now since we last heard from Kyle :( He hasn't updated the blog or has he updated the comments. Haven't seen him on SM either,He may have caught a flight back home and is resting? I would imagine we will hear soon if the search is done or whats goin on? Hopefully they are all safe and in good health.


From what I have heard, they are definitely still searching.
[/quote

 I don't doubt that for a minute ! Prayers for you all..
Hug the other half for me.. k?   :cool:
 I have a good feeling about this all.. I dont post much.. trying to get my life in order somewhat... BUT  do have a gret feeling.. and feel answers are right around the corner.    HUGS


 SORRY.. I messed that all up  :(


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on January 08, 2008, 11:40:18 PM
Dammit.. I give up.. pffttttttttttttttttttttt    :2doh:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 08, 2008, 11:41:31 PM
Casa   :lol: I don't recognize me either, lol  :lol:

Angie - don't worry about it  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on January 08, 2008, 11:48:30 PM
Casa   :lol: I don't recognize me either, lol  :lol:

Angie - don't worry about it  :wink:

  LOL Klaas   :wink:   Thanks ! 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 08, 2008, 11:52:19 PM
Private Investigator TJ Ward Interview for those that havent heard it before it's one of the best interviews you will hear from him.
5-1-07
640 WGST Atlanta. Talk. Radio.


http://tinyurl.com/33o437


Real Joran Posts TJ Ward must have some good info on the sloots..Joran doesnt like PI'S  :wink:
(http://img236.imageshack.us/img236/9397/joran17cs4.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)
(http://img402.imageshack.us/img402/7269/joran13aw3.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 08, 2008, 11:53:30 PM
Dammit.. I give up.. pffttttttttttttttttttttt    :2doh:

 :lol:

Good Night Angie.  Good Night Monkeys.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 08, 2008, 11:54:00 PM
I am still wondering who was arrested June 11th at 6AM. The first article says Freddy was being held since June 9th..Unless that is incorrect,someone else was arrested on June 11th 2005 at 6AM after the Confession and leading them to the body..etc.

ORANJESTAD, Aruba -- Satish and Deepak Kalpoe, the two Surinamese brothers previously detained in the Natalee Holloway case, have been re-arrested on suspicion of premeditated rape and murder, Aruban government officials said Friday. A third person was also detained.

Prosecutor's office spokeswoman Mariaine Croes told FOX News that the third person was a man known as "Freddy" or "F.A.," said to be a friend of Joran van der Sloot, who has been held in the case since June 9.

It was unclear if the third arrest was related to the Holloway case.

"Freddy" has been held since June 9?
http://freedomeden.blogspot.com/2005/08/more-from-aruba.html
-----------------------------------------------
6AM Arrest on June 11th 2005
Police investigating the disappearance of an Alabama honors student in Aruba arrested a man at dawn Saturday, hours after one of three young men already in custody admitted "something bad happened" to the woman after they took her to the beach.
    It was unclear if the 6 a.m. arrest was related to the admission. The same team of officers who arrested five others in the case during the past week went to a home just outside Oranjestad, the capital, and came out with a handcuffed man who looked to be in his 20s.

    Saturday morning, police refused to comment on the arrest or say if they had discovered anything overnight that solved the mystery of what happened to Natalee Holloway, 18, who was last seen in the early hours of May 30.

    Late Friday, Deputy Police Commissioner Gerold Dompig told The Associated Press that the man who made the statement was leading police to the scene. He refused to identify which of the three young men who took her to a beach the night she went missing made the statement.

http://forum.fok.nl/topic/710730/2/50


Whoa!!  Hold on!  According to this they are counting Freddy as the third person arrested.  Did I read that right? He was arrested with the Kalpoes on this day also.

Deepak
Satish
Joran
Freddy
Who is next...the person arrested on June 11...wonder who it was?

Guido has been questioned before June 9. In fact, I think Guido was trying to get out of dodge by this time.   Hmmmm had they arrested Guido before this? The 2 guards. One of the fishermen. Several Pro Services employees.  They knew the guards were innocent by now. By the 11th they had talked to Satish twice according to the discovery log. Then they talked to Freddy again on the 12th.  This interesting...this leaves all sorts of things open if this is true.  Where is Mum?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on January 08, 2008, 11:56:03 PM
Dammit.. I give up.. pffttttttttttttttttttttt    :2doh:

 :lol:

Good Night Angie.  Good Night Monkeys.

Janet

 Hi Janet !  Nice to see you and goodnight to you. Sweet dreams !


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 08, 2008, 11:56:44 PM
Remember the cartoon discussion?  The picture of the drink with the glass inside?

From Deepak 6/11/2205
To your question as to what kind of drink that is, I can say the following. This drink is beer with a shot of "151" vodka in a small glass inside the glass of beer.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: robots on January 08, 2008, 11:57:20 PM
Dammit.. I give up.. pffttttttttttttttttttttt    :2doh:
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :P :P :P :P


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on January 09, 2008, 12:07:01 AM
Dammit.. I give up.. pffttttttttttttttttttttt    :2doh:
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :P :P :P :P

  Hey you !  :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 09, 2008, 12:07:52 AM
Casa   :lol: I don't recognize me either, lol  :lol:

Angie - don't worry about it  :wink:

OMG!  You are out of your cage!   :shock:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 09, 2008, 12:11:59 AM

<snipped>

ORANJESTAD, Aruba -- Satish and Deepak Kalpoe, the two Surinamese brothers previously detained in the Natalee Holloway case, have been re-arrested on suspicion of premeditated rape and murder, Aruban government officials said Friday. A third person was also detained.

Prosecutor's office spokeswoman Mariaine Croes told FOX News that the third person was a man known as "Freddy" or "F.A.," said to be a friend of Joran van der Sloot, who has been held in the case since June 9.

It was unclear if the third arrest was related to the Holloway case.

"Freddy" has been held since June 9?
http://freedomeden.blogspot.com/2005/08/more-from-aruba.html
-----------------------------------------------
<snipped>

******* ... in July Deepak and Satish were released from detention while the judge ruled that Joran was to held another sixty days.  At  end of August ... Deepak and Satish were rearrested in regards to the Natalee Holloway case and ... Freddy was arrested on unrelated suspicions.  I believe that Joran van der Sloot was the person the article was referring to as being held since June 9, 2005 ... not Freddy.

Janet



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on January 09, 2008, 12:12:25 AM
Casa   :lol: I don't recognize me either, lol  :lol:

Angie - don't worry about it  :wink:

OMG!  You are out of your cage!   :shock:

  I just realized that too !!   lol   


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 09, 2008, 12:13:58 AM
Remember the cartoon discussion?  The picture of the drink with the glass inside?

From Deepak 6/11/2205
To your question as to what kind of drink that is, I can say the following. This drink is beer with a shot of "151" vodka in a small glass inside the glass of beer.

Lala'sMom ... great catch!!

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 09, 2008, 12:15:09 AM
I am still wondering who was arrested June 11th at 6AM. The first article says Freddy was being held since June 9th..Unless that is incorrect,someone else was arrested on June 11th 2005 at 6AM after the Confession and leading them to the body..etc.

ORANJESTAD, Aruba -- Satish and Deepak Kalpoe, the two Surinamese brothers previously detained in the Natalee Holloway case, have been re-arrested on suspicion of premeditated rape and murder, Aruban government officials said Friday. A third person was also detained.

Prosecutor's office spokeswoman Mariaine Croes told FOX News that the third person was a man known as "Freddy" or "F.A.," said to be a friend of Joran van der Sloot, who has been held in the case since June 9.

It was unclear if the third arrest was related to the Holloway case.

"Freddy" has been held since June 9?
http://freedomeden.blogspot.com/2005/08/more-from-aruba.html
-----------------------------------------------
6AM Arrest on June 11th 2005
Police investigating the disappearance of an Alabama honors student in Aruba arrested a man at dawn Saturday, hours after one of three young men already in custody admitted "something bad happened" to the woman after they took her to the beach.
    It was unclear if the 6 a.m. arrest was related to the admission. The same team of officers who arrested five others in the case during the past week went to a home just outside Oranjestad, the capital, and came out with a handcuffed man who looked to be in his 20s.

    Saturday morning, police refused to comment on the arrest or say if they had discovered anything overnight that solved the mystery of what happened to Natalee Holloway, 18, who was last seen in the early hours of May 30.

    Late Friday, Deputy Police Commissioner Gerold Dompig told The Associated Press that the man who made the statement was leading police to the scene. He refused to identify which of the three young men who took her to a beach the night she went missing made the statement.

http://forum.fok.nl/topic/710730/2/50

Sorry, I didn't get that count right...it should be like this according to the above info...

Deepak
Satish
Joran
Freddy
?
? June 11th arrest.

Now, it could be like this...
Deepak
Satish
Joran
?
Freddy
? June 11th arrest.

Freddy could be the 5th suspect....yes he could.  That is if they don't count the SG as suspects here.  Otherwise that would indicate that Freddy was arrested before the Kalpoes and Joran that day.  Then that would leave us with Joran in 5th place and I don't quite understand that in context of Simian's post.  I really need Mum to help me.  :roll: I am getting heartburn over all this 5th stuff.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 09, 2008, 12:17:21 AM
Private Investigator TJ Ward Interview for those that havent heard it before it's one of the best interviews you will hear from him.
5-1-07
640 WGST Atlanta. Talk. Radio.

http://tinyurl.com/33o437

<snipped>



Thank you *******

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 09, 2008, 12:17:22 AM
I believe your right Janet..So maybee it was Freddy arrested at 6AM on the 11th. The report said a man in his 20's so that could be almost anyone in this case :(


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: crazybabyborg on January 09, 2008, 12:18:07 AM
Hi guys! I'm back reading to catch up, but wanted to say hello before you all went to bed! BTW.........Check the lounge for new Valentine avis!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 09, 2008, 12:21:26 AM

<snipped>

ORANJESTAD, Aruba -- Satish and Deepak Kalpoe, the two Surinamese brothers previously detained in the Natalee Holloway case, have been re-arrested on suspicion of premeditated rape and murder, Aruban government officials said Friday. A third person was also detained.

Prosecutor's office spokeswoman Mariaine Croes told FOX News that the third person was a man known as "Freddy" or "F.A.," said to be a friend of Joran van der Sloot, who has been held in the case since June 9.

It was unclear if the third arrest was related to the Holloway case.

"Freddy" has been held since June 9?
http://freedomeden.blogspot.com/2005/08/more-from-aruba.html
-----------------------------------------------
<snipped>

******* ... in July Deepak and Satish were released from detention while the judge ruled that Joran was to held another sixty days.  At  end of August ... Deepak and Satish were rearrested in regards to the Natalee Holloway case and ... Freddy was arrested on unrelated suspicions.  I believe that Joran van der Sloot was the person the article was referring to as being held since June 9, 2005 ... not Freddy.

Janet



I think you are right...whew!  I was getting more confused by the minute.  Thanks.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: texasmom on January 09, 2008, 12:22:30 AM
We are going on 3 days now since we last heard from Kyle :( He hasn't updated the blog or has he updated the comments. Haven't seen him on SM either,He may have caught a flight back home and is resting? I would imagine we will hear soon if the search is done or whats goin on? Hopefully they are all safe and in good health.


From what I have heard, they are definitely still searching.

thank goodness....I needed to hear (read) that!  I've washed and blow dryed one sheltie with a very thick coat and am resting for a minute before I do the other.  I'm so tired, I'm not tired.....but I have extremely too much nervous energy.  My sons think I'm losing it, I'm sure.  One of them asked me why in the world I started washing the dogs after 10pm, I just looked at him and he quietly went to his room......In case you can't tell I'm a rather anxious monkey..... my insides feel like this! :bounce:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 09, 2008, 12:23:21 AM
If you counted just the suspects that were arrested not including the 2 SG'S this is who I come up with.

1.Deepak
2.Satish
3.Joran
4.Paulus
5.Guido


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: robots on January 09, 2008, 12:25:00 AM
Dammit.. I give up.. pffttttttttttttttttttttt    :2doh:
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :P :P :P :P

  Hey you !  :cool:
:wink: :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 09, 2008, 12:25:41 AM
I believe your right Janet..So maybee it was Freddy arrested at 6AM on the 11th. The report said a man in his 20's so that could be almost anyone in this case :(

OK, wait another minute...that would make Freddy as the 6th person arrested according to our thinking now...right? So who was the other person?  I think I may need to give this up and go back to Shango...at least I can stay confused and not have moments of lucid thinking with him...better on my heart.

So in the last five minutes it's gone back to this...
Deepak
Satish
Joran
? 4th person
? 5th person
Freddy

Yes, I am rolling my eyes.  :roll: :roll: :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on January 09, 2008, 12:28:37 AM
We are going on 3 days now since we last heard from Kyle :( He hasn't updated the blog or has he updated the comments. Haven't seen him on SM either,He may have caught a flight back home and is resting? I would imagine we will hear soon if the search is done or whats goin on? Hopefully they are all safe and in good health.


From what I have heard, they are definitely still searching.

thank goodness....I needed to hear (read) that!  I've washed and blow dryed one sheltie with a very thick coat and am resting for a minute before I do the other.  I'm so tired, I'm not tired.....but I have extremely too much nervous energy.  My sons think I'm losing it, I'm sure.  One of them asked me why in the world I started washing the dogs after 10pm, I just looked at him and he quietly went to his room......In case you can't tell I'm a rather anxious monkey..... my insides feel like this! :bounce:

 I feel for you. Trust me !!   :smt052  We need to relax ..  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 09, 2008, 12:31:28 AM
If you counted the 2 SG'S then #5 could be Joran(Only suspects). I know from the video though on June 9th he was arrested before the sun came up. Maybee the 3 were arrests were at the same time?

If you counted just arrests not including the 2 security guards then #5 could be Lorenzo. If Shango told us who the first two suspects were then this would all be easier  :lol:

1.Deepak
2.Satish
3.Joran
4.June 11th arrest(Could also be Lorenzo and no 5?)
5.Lorenzo on June 16th


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 09, 2008, 12:33:31 AM
If you counted just the suspects that were arrested not including the 2 SG'S this is who I come up with.

1.Deepak
2.Satish
3.Joran
4.Paulus
5.Guido


Guido has always been in the back of my mind.  But then again we have to go with suspects vs witnesses.  According to other news reports Guido is not the 5th person..in fact he doesn't come up at all. So I am still out there looking. He doesn't fit the criteria for the 5th suspect....I thought he was in the casino that night working. My head is beginning to ache again. :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on January 09, 2008, 12:34:30 AM
If you counted the 2 SG'S then #5 could be Joran(Only suspects). I know from the video though on June 9th he was arrested before the sun came up. Maybee the 3 were arrests were at the same time?

If you counted just arrests not including the 2 security guards then #5 could be Lorenzo.

1.Deepak
2.Satish
3.Joran
4.June 11th arrest(Could also be Lorenzo and no 5?)
5.Lorenzo on June 16th
   

 Ducking for cover *******.. but IMO  Lorenzo OR  PVDS was the 5th from all I have read over the past.  IMO  or MOO or whatever it is. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on January 09, 2008, 12:36:25 AM
If you counted just the suspects that were arrested not including the 2 SG'S this is who I come up with.

1.Deepak
2.Satish
3.Joran
4.Paulus
5.Guido


Guido has always been in the back of my mind.  But then again we have to go with suspects vs witnesses.  According to other news reports Guido is not the 5th person..in fact he doesn't come up at all. So I am still out there looking. He doesn't fit the criteria for the 5th suspect....I thought he was in the casino that night working. My head is beginning to ache again. :roll:
[/quote

 <~~~~~~~~~~ passing lalas some ADVIL
 lalas.. I agrew with yah.. no Guido as the 5th.   


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on January 09, 2008, 12:38:27 AM
I am PATHETIC,.,. Im sorry Lalas.. I screwd up quotes AGAIN..   :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:
 Write me up in your book..   :2doh:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Icehawk on January 09, 2008, 12:39:10 AM
June 17, 2005
Breaking: Fourth Suspect Arrested In Natalee Holloway Disappearance (Updates)
Topics: Natalee Holloway

Updates - see below.

Just breaking, FoxTV reporting that a fourth suspect has been arrested, a 26 year old son of a prominent businessman. A search is presently underway ...


From Scared Monkeys:

"9:17 am: From one of our great sources in Aruba, 'americaninaruba' …

today 6am police go into house in Sta Cruz where they go with one person ……with initials S.C. this arrest took place 6am this morning…surprised the family with this arrest….we got different information, but we want to get all concrete things together before we bring this news to you…..we dont want to confuse anyone! we want to say that their is suspicion that she is ALIVE! but we dont want to bring up any suspicion to anyone but we will be back with info if this person has information for this case…also in Savaneta they took someone for interogation…..we are hoping this will come to an end, with all this suspicion we believe shes alive…..'

****
At 9:50 am: MSNBC & Fox have just reported the arrest of a fourth suspect. A 27 year old man.
It has been confirmed by Fox speaking to individual in Justice department 4th arrest 26 year old friend of joran."

More to come.

I still think we are looking at a drug/alcohol issue; could this guy have sold a date rape drug to Joran? Pure speculation. On the other hand, I hope that she just ran away - at least she'd be alive.

Update:

AP via Yahoo - The person was identified by the attorney general's office only as a 26-year-old with the initials S.G.C.

Also in custody are 17-year-old Joran van der Sloot, the son of a justice official on Aruba, and his two friends, Surinamese brothers Deepak Kalpoe, 21, and Satish Kalpoe, 18.

Update: (Possible 5th supect) 10:45 AM via Scared Monkeys.
There is a rumor of another person taken into custody, whose father recently committed suicide and who has had serious mental issues since. He has two homes, a house on the main road of savaneta and also another one in Seroe Alejandro, and was known for having underground parties.

A subsequent update from Scared Monkeys notes that there is no 5th suspect. However, Natalee's mom has stated publicly that she expects more arrests(see below).

Update via reader MC: Latest suspect is Steve Gregory Croes, a DJ on a party boat.

Tallahassee Democrat:

[...]
Steve Gregory Croes, 26, whom authorities earlier identified only by the initials S.G.C., said he was contacted by police Thursday night and voluntarily gave a statement, said his employer, Marcus Wiggins. Croes also said he knew one of two Surinamese brothers being detained in the case because they went to the same Internet cafe, Wiggins told The Associated Press.Croes was a DJ on the Tattoo, which offers nightly dining, dancing and swimming, Wiggins said. Holloway's mother, Beth Holloway Twitty, said she believed there might be more arrests before the case was resolved. She did not elaborate.



http://www.hyscience.com/archives/2005/06/breaking_fourth.php




******* is this what you are looking for?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 09, 2008, 12:41:58 AM
Ducking for cover *******.. but IMO  Lorenzo OR  PVDS was the 5th from all I have read over the past.  IMO  or MOO or whatever it is. 

Your right..But just trying to give my 2 cents and help out Lala..She deserves to know who is no 5 in Shangos eyes  :wink:



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 09, 2008, 12:43:25 AM
Lala:

I messed up..GVC was arrested before Guido in April 2006..So he is no5 suspect not including the 2 SG'S.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: texasmom on January 09, 2008, 12:44:08 AM
We are going on 3 days now since we last heard from Kyle :( He hasn't updated the blog or has he updated the comments. Haven't seen him on SM either,He may have caught a flight back home and is resting? I would imagine we will hear soon if the search is done or whats goin on? Hopefully they are all safe and in good health.


From what I have heard, they are definitely still searching.

thank goodness....I needed to hear (read) that!  I've washed and blow dryed one sheltie with a very thick coat and am resting for a minute before I do the other.  I'm so tired, I'm not tired.....but I have extremely too much nervous energy.  My sons think I'm losing it, I'm sure.  One of them asked me why in the world I started washing the dogs after 10pm, I just looked at him and he quietly went to his room......In case you can't tell I'm a rather anxious monkey..... my insides feel like this! :bounce:

 I feel for you. Trust me !!   :smt052  We need to relax ..  :wink:

thanks Angie   :smt052


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 09, 2008, 12:44:53 AM
We are going on 3 days now since we last heard from Kyle :( He hasn't updated the blog or has he updated the comments. Haven't seen him on SM either,He may have caught a flight back home and is resting? I would imagine we will hear soon if the search is done or whats goin on? Hopefully they are all safe and in good health.


From what I have heard, they are definitely still searching.

thank goodness....I needed to hear (read) that!  I've washed and blow dryed one sheltie with a very thick coat and am resting for a minute before I do the other.  I'm so tired, I'm not tired.....but I have extremely too much nervous energy.  My sons think I'm losing it, I'm sure.  One of them asked me why in the world I started washing the dogs after 10pm, I just looked at him and he quietly went to his room......In case you can't tell I'm a rather anxious monkey..... my insides feel like this! :bounce:

Sit here with us...give me your hand.  I have been here for a long time, as have so many others, and we are in for the long haul.  I only have to put myself in Beth and Dave's shoes and think how awful it has been for them.  That is when you get grounded and know there are still some really great people left in this cruel world and a lot of them are on the Persistence.  Until they officially close this case and hand the files over to the family...I will be here. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on January 09, 2008, 12:45:40 AM
Ducking for cover *******.. but IMO  Lorenzo OR  PVDS was the 5th from all I have read over the past.  IMO  or MOO or whatever it is. 

Your right..But just trying to give my 2 cents and help out Lala..She deserves to know who is no 5 in Shangos eyes  :wink:


[/quote

  Yep,, I agree with yah 100%    :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 09, 2008, 12:47:17 AM
Hi Icehawk  :cool:

Ive read about those 3 days on every board imagineable..Even translated a dutch one the other day  :lol: Most definitely believe no5 is Lorenzo but I think we are covering all our bases to make sure  :D Nobody counts the security guards not even in the articles  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 09, 2008, 12:50:55 AM
Ducking for cover *******.. but IMO  Lorenzo OR  PVDS was the 5th from all I have read over the past.  IMO  or MOO or whatever it is. 

Your right..But just trying to give my 2 cents and help out Lala..She deserves to know who is no 5 in Shangos eyes  :wink:




I hate to correct the mod around here...but honey, Shango does not talk about the 5th suspect...it is Simian.  I won't comment any further on the above.  :roll: (Can I call a moderator honey?)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on January 09, 2008, 12:51:01 AM
Me thinks I need to go.. I have managed to mess up quite a few posts..   :shock: I apologize..
Have a good night everyone. again HUGS to our CP an Nemo.   
 Hope this post turns out ok?   lol     :smt102


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Bearlyhere on January 09, 2008, 12:51:31 AM
What's going on around here?  Are you guys playing strip poker?

Klaas is out of her cage and Angie changed right in front of us. :shock: :shock:

Deal me in!!! :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: texasmom on January 09, 2008, 12:52:10 AM
We are going on 3 days now since we last heard from Kyle :( He hasn't updated the blog or has he updated the comments. Haven't seen him on SM either,He may have caught a flight back home and is resting? I would imagine we will hear soon if the search is done or whats goin on? Hopefully they are all safe and in good health.


From what I have heard, they are definitely still searching.

thank goodness....I needed to hear (read) that!  I've washed and blow dryed one sheltie with a very thick coat and am resting for a minute before I do the other.  I'm so tired, I'm not tired.....but I have extremely too much nervous energy.  My sons think I'm losing it, I'm sure.  One of them asked me why in the world I started washing the dogs after 10pm, I just looked at him and he quietly went to his room......In case you can't tell I'm a rather anxious monkey..... my insides feel like this! :bounce:

Sit here with us...give me your hand.  I have been here for a long time, as have so many others, and we are in for the long haul.  I only have to put myself in Beth and Dave's shoes and think how awful it has been for them.  That is when you get grounded and know there are still some really great people left in this cruel world and a lot of them are on the Persistence.  Until they officially close this case and hand the files over to the family...I will be here. 
such kind words Lala's thank you so much, and I'm so glad you're here....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on January 09, 2008, 12:52:41 AM
Ducking for cover *******.. but IMO  Lorenzo OR  PVDS was the 5th from all I have read over the past.  IMO  or MOO or whatever it is. 

Your right..But just trying to give my 2 cents and help out Lala..She deserves to know who is no 5 in Shangos eyes  :wink:




I hate to correct the mod around here...but honey, Shango does not talk about the 5th suspect...it is Simian.  I won't comment any further on the above.  :roll: (Can I call a moderator honey?)

  LMAO  Ummmmmmmmmmm I think you just did   :cool:  TY for the laugh before I head to bed  Lalas.. !


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 09, 2008, 12:53:28 AM
I am PATHETIC,.,. Im sorry Lalas.. I screwd up quotes AGAIN..   :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:
 Write me up in your book..   :2doh:

Thanks for the Advil...I think it's all those hearts getting in your way.  Stand still!  :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 09, 2008, 12:54:24 AM
Ducking for cover *******.. but IMO  Lorenzo OR  PVDS was the 5th from all I have read over the past.  IMO  or MOO or whatever it is. 

Your right..But just trying to give my 2 cents and help out Lala..She deserves to know who is no 5 in Shangos eyes  :wink:




I hate to correct the mod around here...but honey, Shango does not talk about the 5th suspect...it is Simian.  I won't comment any further on the above.  :roll: (Can I call a moderator honey?)

Sorry meant Simian  :lol: I left all the studying of shango/simian to you codebreakers  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on January 09, 2008, 12:55:56 AM
What's going on around here?  Are you guys playing strip poker?

Klaas is out of her cage and Angie changed right in front of us. :shock: :shock:

Deal me in!!! :cool:

 LMAO   CBB made me a new outfit.. I didnt even ask  :shock:  Sorry if I skeered you all changing  lol


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 09, 2008, 12:56:56 AM
I believe your right Janet..So maybee it was Freddy arrested at 6AM on the 11th. The report said a man in his 20's so that could be almost anyone in this case :(

I believe that Freddy was question as a witness on June 12, 2005 but ... was never detained (arrested) as a suspect.

Good Night Monkeys ... for real this time.   :lol:

Janet

++++++++++++


JORAN, DEEPAK, SATISH, PAULUS AND STEVE
FOX NEWS
June 24, 2005


Joran van der Sloot (search) and his friends Deepak and Satish Kalpoe are being held under suspicion of murder and kidnapping as well as being an accessory to murder.

A fourth man, party boat DJ Steve Croes, is being held under the same conditions.

The fifth man, Paul van der Sloot (search) — the father of 17-year-old Joran — was being held on suspicion of complicity to pre-meditated murder, complicity to kidnapping and murder and kidnapping. Under the Aruban system, complicity is a lesser charge.

+++++++++++++

Kalpoe v. McGraw, et al.
Case Number: BC3 63401


Name: Freddy Alexander Arambatzis
Date: 12 June 2005 / 11:05
Pages: 5
Writer/Initiator: Dennis Jacobs & Juan Boezem
Description: witness statement of Joran van der Sloot's neighbor/friend


Freddy Arambatzis
Joran's Book
June 12, 2005


Monday afternoon on the 30th, Joran came to my house.

He told me that the previous day, Sunday, he had befriended a girl in the Holiday Inn casino and that she had invited him to come to Carlos and Charlies that evening. He went and they danced and drank together.

After that he, Deepak Satish and the girl drove off. Her friends saw that. The drove in the direction of the Lighthouse; a white car was behind them and most likely wanted to race Deepak. But that is something Deepak would never do. Joran told me that he fingered and had french kissed the girl while they were driving. He did not say that he had had sex with her.

They drove to the Lighthouse, she wanted to see sharks. But Deepak only drove up to the Lighthouse because his car is very low to the ground and cannot drive up to the North side of Aruba.

The girl had said to Joran that if Deepak and Satish would have lived in her town, they would be slaves.

After that they drove to the hotel. When the girl had pushed open the door of the car, she fell to the ground. Joran wanted to help her but she shoved him away. (....)

The next day, Tuesday May 31st 2005 in the afternoon, I was with Joran at the raquetclub. Joran looked worried. He asked me if I could remember what he had said the previous day about the girl. I told him yes.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 09, 2008, 12:57:03 AM
What's going on around here?  Are you guys playing strip poker?

Klaas is out of her cage and Angie changed right in front of us. :shock: :shock:

Deal me in!!! :cool:

Hi there! Where have you been?  Missed your little bear face. We are just talking Shango and Simian again...I am sure you are not surprised.  :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on January 09, 2008, 12:59:02 AM
I am PATHETIC,.,. Im sorry Lalas.. I screwd up quotes AGAIN..   :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:
 Write me up in your book..   :2doh:

Thanks for the Advil...I think it's all those hearts getting in your way.  Stand still!  :roll:

   LOL IM trying.. but. Im worse in real life.. and I WILL stand still one of these days !   :cool:
CBB gave me the heart~ons..    :2doh:    LOL   :wink: And dont you run for those damn MUFFS either.  :2doh:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on January 09, 2008, 01:00:57 AM
We are going on 3 days now since we last heard from Kyle :( He hasn't updated the blog or has he updated the comments. Haven't seen him on SM either,He may have caught a flight back home and is resting? I would imagine we will hear soon if the search is done or whats goin on? Hopefully they are all safe and in good health.


From what I have heard, they are definitely still searching.

thank goodness....I needed to hear (read) that!  I've washed and blow dryed one sheltie with a very thick coat and am resting for a minute before I do the other.  I'm so tired, I'm not tired.....but I have extremely too much nervous energy.  My sons think I'm losing it, I'm sure.  One of them asked me why in the world I started washing the dogs after 10pm, I just looked at him and he quietly went to his room......In case you can't tell I'm a rather anxious monkey..... my insides feel like this! :bounce:

 I feel for you. Trust me !!   :smt052  We need to relax ..  :wink:

thanks Angie   :smt052


  YW   :smt052 and nice to meet yah ! 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: klaasend on January 09, 2008, 01:02:17 AM
Interresting, Glenda/Renfro has crawled out from under her rock to post at RU tonight.  Wonder what's got her motivated to post?  Of course, she's posting crap blaming anything thay might have happened to Natalee on Beth for allowing her to go to a location where drinking was legal for 18yr olds.  :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Bearlyhere on January 09, 2008, 01:02:18 AM
What's going on around here?  Are you guys playing strip poker?

Klaas is out of her cage and Angie changed right in front of us. :shock: :shock:

Deal me in!!! :cool:

 LMAO   CBB made me a new outfit.. I didnt even ask  :shock:  Sorry if I skeered you all changing  lol

You look nice in hearts,


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on January 09, 2008, 01:04:38 AM
Interresting, Glenda/Renfro has crawled out from under her rock to post at RU tonight.  Wonder what's got her motivated to post?  Of course, she's posting crap blaming anything thay might have happened to Natalee on Beth for allowing her to go to a location where drinking was legal for 18yr olds.  :roll:

  What a skank bitch   :-x :-x :-x


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Bearlyhere on January 09, 2008, 01:06:35 AM
What's going on around here?  Are you guys playing strip poker?

Klaas is out of her cage and Angie changed right in front of us. :shock: :shock:

Deal me in!!! :cool:

Hi there! Where have you been?  Missed your little bear face. We are just talking Shango and Simian again...I am sure you are not surprised.  :lol:

Hi Lala's.  Thanks.

Shango and Simian, really?  What a surprise.   :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 09, 2008, 01:07:18 AM
I am PATHETIC,.,. Im sorry Lalas.. I screwd up quotes AGAIN..   :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:
 Write me up in your book..   :2doh:

Thanks for the Advil...I think it's all those hearts getting in your way.  Stand still!  :roll:

   LOL IM trying.. but. Im worse in real life.. and I WILL stand still one of these days !   :cool:
CBB gave me the heart~ons..    :2doh:    LOL   :wink: And dont you run for those damn MUFFS either.  :2doh:

We are so gonna be in trouble tomorrow... :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on January 09, 2008, 01:09:44 AM
I did it again.. F'd up another quote.. I gotta go to bed. I have alot of work ahead of me.. perhaps a NEW job on the horizon..  Gonna be a gramma.. and hit with a divorce ! Merry Chritmas and Happy New Year to Angie !
 I WILL survive this dammit.  I know I have it in me..   :2doh: 

 Good night everyone..  HUGS ans sweet dreams..  :smt052


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Bearlyhere on January 09, 2008, 01:09:59 AM

   LOL IM trying.. but. Im worse in real life.. and I WILL stand still one of these days !   :cool:
CBB gave me the heart~ons..    :2doh:    LOL   :wink: And dont you run for those damn MUFFS either.  :2doh:

Are you wearing bunny ears?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 09, 2008, 01:10:08 AM
Interresting, Glenda/Renfro has crawled out from under her rock to post at RU tonight.  Wonder what's got her motivated to post?  Of course, she's posting crap blaming anything thay might have happened to Natalee on Beth for allowing her to go to a location where drinking was legal for 18yr olds.  :roll:

Must have been a really big rock. :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: texasmom on January 09, 2008, 01:12:13 AM
I did it again.. F'd up another quote.. I gotta go to bed. I have alot of work ahead of me.. perhaps a NEW job on the horizon..  Gonna be a gramma.. and hit with a divorce ! Merry Chritmas and Happy New Year to Angie !
 I WILL survive this dammit.  I know I have it in me..   :2doh: 

 Good night everyone..  HUGS ans sweet dreams..  :smt052

YOU WILL SURVIVE ANGIE!  We all love you and you will be in my thoughts and prayers.  Take care of yourself.  nite!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on January 09, 2008, 01:12:20 AM
I am PATHETIC,.,. Im sorry Lalas.. I screwd up quotes AGAIN..   :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:
 Write me up in your book..   :2doh:

Thanks for the Advil...I think it's all those hearts getting in your way.  Stand still!  :roll:

   LOL IM trying.. but. Im worse in real life.. and I WILL stand still one of these days !   :cool:
CBB gave me the heart~ons..    :2doh:    LOL   :wink: And dont you run for those damn MUFFS either.  :2doh:

We are so gonna be in trouble tomorrow... :lol:


 Yah think?   lol  Luv yah chicky.. Niters..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 09, 2008, 01:14:18 AM
If you have never read the report by Clausens Investigation on the Lions Den it is a interesting read.MO
http://nataleehollowaywhatweknowsofar.blogspot.com/ 
 (Near bottom of page for rest of the report)

(http://img293.imageshack.us/img293/198/lionsden44hi9.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)
(http://img212.imageshack.us/img212/6307/lionsden64rc2.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)
(http://img186.imageshack.us/img186/4056/lionsden151jt9.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Bearlyhere on January 09, 2008, 01:14:33 AM
Interresting, Glenda/Renfro has crawled out from under her rock to post at RU tonight.  Wonder what's got her motivated to post?  Of course, she's posting crap blaming anything thay might have happened to Natalee on Beth for allowing her to go to a location where drinking was legal for 18yr olds.  :roll:

Must have been a really big rock. :roll:

You need to fumigate the cage just bringing her name here.  Everyone close their eyes while I spray..

Did I get it all?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Bearlyhere on January 09, 2008, 01:16:29 AM
I did it again.. F'd up another quote.. I gotta go to bed. I have alot of work ahead of me.. perhaps a NEW job on the horizon..  Gonna be a gramma.. and hit with a divorce ! Merry Chritmas and Happy New Year to Angie !
 I WILL survive this dammit.  I know I have it in me..   :2doh: 

 Good night everyone..  HUGS ans sweet dreams..  :smt052

YOU WILL SURVIVE ANGIE!  We all love you and you will be in my thoughts and prayers.  Take care of yourself.  nite!

Ditto.  I'm so sorry Angie.  :sad:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 09, 2008, 01:16:46 AM
Interresting, Glenda/Renfro has crawled out from under her rock to post at RU tonight.  Wonder what's got her motivated to post?  Of course, she's posting crap blaming anything thay might have happened to Natalee on Beth for allowing her to go to a location where drinking was legal for 18yr olds.  :roll:

Must have been a really big rock. :roll:

You need to fumigate the cage just bringing her name here.  Everyone close their eyes while I spray..

Did I get it all?

Cough...cough....I think you got her....cough, cough... :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 09, 2008, 01:24:00 AM
Time for me to hug Nemo...I remember reading all that before.  I spent hours looking at the Clausen info...fascinating.  I wish I had saved all that stuff.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 09, 2008, 01:29:55 AM
The Clausen report said Freddy takes his pictures in the Lions Den.

(http://img337.imageshack.us/img337/982/lionsden24bc4.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 09, 2008, 01:45:56 AM
10/10/05 Big Story

Dompig also talks about Joran van der Sloot’s “apartment” (a little house hooked on to his parents house). He says that Aruban judges DENIED a search warrant of the van der Sloot property, because “they did not make a good enough case”.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Bearlyhere on January 09, 2008, 01:57:08 AM
10/10/05 Big Story

Dompig also talks about Joran van der Sloot’s “apartment” (a little house hooked on to his parents house). He says that Aruban judges DENIED a search warrant of the van der Sloot property, because “they did not make a good enough case”.

Now they're sorry they didn't search the whole property.  GMAB  :-x


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 09, 2008, 02:10:33 AM
(http://img169.imageshack.us/img169/5821/deathrc7.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 09, 2008, 02:20:36 AM
Is that blood on her feet? How did she die again? Drowning? Body put in a dirty pick up truck?  :shock:

(http://img337.imageshack.us/img337/7129/feetwl7.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Bearlyhere on January 09, 2008, 02:21:01 AM
*******...Did you used to have a different name or am I imagining things? :2doh:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 09, 2008, 02:22:44 AM
*******...Did you used to have a different name or am I imagining things? :2doh:

I have always used one name.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Bearlyhere on January 09, 2008, 02:24:55 AM
*******...Did you used to have a different name or am I imagining things? :2doh:

I have always used one name.

Oh.  I thought your monkey looked familiar, that's all.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Bearlyhere on January 09, 2008, 02:27:32 AM
Is that blood on her feet? How did she die again? Drowning? Body put in a dirty pick up truck?  :shock:



I don't know this one.  That sure looks like blood on her feet.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 09, 2008, 02:38:49 AM
Is that blood on her feet? How did she die again? Drowning? Body put in a dirty pick up truck?  :shock:



I don't know this one.  That sure looks like blood on her feet.
Hmmm..It appears the toes could have cuts on them. I guess its possible she stepped on coral when she drowned. When they pulled her out it dried on her feet? Is that possible?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: Observer on January 09, 2008, 02:46:45 AM
The article says it was tourist from Bulgaria..Probably a man(Mascuilino) died in a fatal accident.

(http://img242.imageshack.us/img242/1053/bulgariasx9.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Bearlyhere on January 09, 2008, 03:15:38 AM
Is that blood on her feet? How did she die again? Drowning? Body put in a dirty pick up truck?  :shock:



I don't know this one.  That sure looks like blood on her feet.
Hmmm..It appears the toes could have cuts on them. I guess its possible she stepped on coral when she drowned. When they pulled her out it dried on her feet? Is that possible?

Either that or something was biting at her feet.   :shock:  It wouldn't bleed forcefully if the heart wasn't beating. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: IBE on January 09, 2008, 03:44:37 AM
Hello everyone. I have been trying to think of something effective that can be done to help Beth keep the pressure on Aruba. Does anyone think this might be an effective tool?

If we had a good letter writer and an attorney to review the letter to assess liability, I wonder how effective it would be to write a letter to the major newspapers of each state basically to tell of Beth's treatment, the boycott, etc

My suggestion would be to turn the tables on Aruba and get a dream team and go to the top & cc Interpol:


At the direction of the President or the Attorney General, the FBI may use its statutory authority to investigate and arrest individuals for violating United States law, even if the FBI’s actions contravene customary international law. The President, acting through the Attorney General, has the inherent constitutional authority to deploy the FBI to investigate and arrest individuals for violating United States law, even if those actions contravene customary international law. Extraterritorial law enforcement activities that are authorized by domestic law are not barred even if they contravene unexecuted treaties or treaty provisions, such as Article 2(4) of the
United Nations Charter. An arrest that is inconsistent with international or foreign law does not violate the Fourth Amendment.

And I would include in that letter:

We read in Extracts of the Espionage and Sabotage Acts and other related federal criminal statutes: U.S. CODE, SECTION 1001, states that "Whoever, in any mater within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact, or makes any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or representations, or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any false, fictitious or fraudulent statement or entry, shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both


Now view this video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ymSWgZm6ivo

Dompig admits there was sexual assault to charge Joran, & Kalpoes and they should be charged, BUT they changed the investigation!
p. 193 (Beth's book) - November 2, 2005 Dompig on MSNBC - Rita Cosby show stated "They are gulty as hell."
Then if you read his various accusations he has accused Beth for interfering in the investigation to place blame on her, he has made accusations that Natalee bought drugs, he has made accusations that Natalee died of an overdose,
he has made accusations that Natalee was buried in the sea, that she ran away, that Beth made her disappear to collect insurance money. He intentionally withheld Texas Equu Search & FBI divers from searches and he has made accusations that the answers are in the United States with the Mountain Brook teens. When the truth is it was Dompig, Dennis Jacobs, Karin Janssen, Jan van der Straaten and unscrupulous judges that allowed the investigation to turn into a circus and crime that the world is still watching and wondering why the DUTCH are so flagrantly standing by and allowing the illegal conduct of the government and judiciary to prolificate. While tourism dollars are sinking Aruba's economy and their only hope is to make deals with illegal entities to keep Aruba afloat.

In addition file not only defamation lawsuits against Dompig, but also American's Julia Renfro and Charles Croes for their part in the cover-up with false and malicious intent to willfully cover-up and slander Beth Holloway and her daughter Natalee Holloway, but also under the Extracts of the Espionage and Sabotage Acts  - which is basically treason act of the U.S. Code.


Pierce the Evil and bring Justice for Natalee.

Well, that is what I would do.

ribbit


Great! Get this going now before we have a new President, new Atty. Gen. and new Secty. of State a year from now, who may or may not be inclined to get involved.

Someone going out of office has no reason not to get involved IMO and especially Ms. Rice who is very familiar with the delegations from Aruba and Beth Holloway.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: IBE on January 09, 2008, 04:01:41 AM
Again...I need help from some monkey...what time did it say that Natalee entered the casino?  What time did Joran come in?  What time was Paulus sitting at the table next to Natalee...I know...it isn't proven that it's him...just humor me. TIA

The timestamp is exactly 8:14 PM when the video was made of Jorna,PVDS and Natalee at the BJ table

Is there a timestamp when Natalee entered the casino?  Do we have that or is what I am talking about after her return trip from the bathroom or something?

Not too many days ago somebody posted that and discovered "proof" that the time on a photo had been changed. Can you search the last months posts?

I don't recall that discussion,was it on the front page? Looking back at the few seconds of footage they released it is just weird that Natalee is pointing in Joran's direction and in the same footage the other MB student is pointing at PVDS. You can clearly see the timestamp on this video. More than 2 hours after Paulus said he left the casino.

(http://img402.imageshack.us/img402/8677/casino3op4.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)


Superior Court
January, 2007

The possible involvement of Paulus with that could then be deducted from the file with the official reports of witnesses, amongst which two people suggested a contact existed between Paulus and Natalee Holloway the night of her disappearance, and a taped report (that was given by the Prosecutor in her final note 1 to the Court).  The taped information and his declaration that  he picked up Joran and Natalee by the McDonalds Palm Beach and brought them to the Holiday Inn, are clearly understood by the Dept. of Justice, and could in the judgement of this Superior Court, be considered as an indication of the involvement of Paulus in the disappearance of Natalee Holloway.”


Who was Joran's/Paulus's friend (Jorans age and part of the pimps, maybe?) whose father owned the security camera company for the casinos and hotels? Who has the knowledge to do time stamp changing? Also was this the same father that wouldn't let his son give a statement but came in for him instead?

Is Dompig now ahead of the camera company for the casinos./hotels now on Aruba? Seems to the "victory" goes the spoils all around Aruba.

Of course this goes along with the rumors of Joran/Paulus, K2 attempting to change the times of cell phones and computers.

Time only stands still for Natalee now. J4N



Who has access to these tapes to change the time stamp to this extent? Posner? the  company who does the surveillance in the casinos? Someone had to order it changed or it was changed without Posner knowing it?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: IBE on January 09, 2008, 04:15:41 AM
Happy New Year to all Monkeys and all visitors here! and to the crew of the ship plus all good people on Aruba.

To bad the bad ones in Aruba and in Holland didn't get a chunck of coal and a cactus in their shoe for Christmas. That also includes those in the US who know they should have done differently also.

IMO  4 places to "have no body, no case"
Cremation (nothing left), hiding in a cript (could be found later and DNA left), at sea (could be found later and DNA left) or sold into human trafficking (could be found later, maybe)

PS... I was looking for locations of Salvation Army Kettles at Christmas so went on their site. Didn't find any list of locations but found that the Salvation Army is very active in fighting and helping those who are victims of Human Trafficking.

I never knew they had programs in that area.

Since I couldn't find a kettle this year, have decided to look into being a kettle ringer at Christmas 2008... at least I will know where there is one :roll:

Wonder if you go into training to get the ring and rhythm just right :lol:

They do have online kettles for donations; but thought you'd be interested in their efforts to stop Human Trafficking.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: IBE on January 09, 2008, 04:22:22 AM
Hi Mum in Ohio... you must be up late or getting up for work. Have a nice day. Am off to find the links to the Salvation Army sites I was talking about and to look to see if I have a Valentine avatar :smt052 :smt052 I miss the people in the Mid-west but I live in a city out here that is like the Mid-west with So.CA weather.

Reminds me.. must re-org. my earthquake stuff. 1994 was the last big on and it was in Jan. just as I was moving into my home after a home fire.. took it off the foundation a little... State Farm isn't my favorite company. 7 yrs of stuff with them!

Great persistence training for hanging in for Natalee!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: MumInOhio on January 09, 2008, 04:35:53 AM
Good Morning Ibe... early riser here...woke up to no power and had to fumble around for candles! Was reading to go get the camping stove and make coffee!


I posted this in the Shango/Simian thread yesterday.

I was remembering who COLUMBO thought “Dirty Hand’ was and ‘Willem’ could have been his boss. When I was reading  Shango and Simian this morning, I tried to work out where he fits. It’s somewhere, as you don’t just sell your house for no reason.  That Visibility site is the same as it was when I first visited it ages ago, so maybe for some reason he needed another house. They have access to a lot of security info from the hotels, and I remember reading about rooms with cameras in them, just one more thing to think about.LOL

Sister is a police officer. Their house was listed for sale as of 12/14/2007.(Yellow…just like the Gottenbos)

CROMVOIRT, Geoffry van - 19 years old, resident of Aruba, who was detained by ALE on 4-15-2006 in an unannounced connection to the Natalee Holloway case. He is the son of the owner of an island security company that supplies equipment and personnel to beach patrol and hotels.  For more information see Who’s Who – Victim, Suspects, Witnesses & Families.

CROMVOIRT, Wilhemus “Willem” Bernadus Henricus Papaya van – owner & operator of VCB Security.  Father of Geoffrey van Cromvoirt. There is some question as to whether the Cromvoirt’s moved to the Netherlands.  Resided at 14D, Paradera, Aruba.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: MumInOhio on January 09, 2008, 04:44:34 AM
LOL...need coffee...ready not reading, though I was...Lala's, you posted last week about arrests on the 11th. What made me think they were brothers? Will go find it!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: MumInOhio on January 09, 2008, 05:03:46 AM
From Cain’s 302:

Saturday June 28th.

From an indoor bar at the Holiday Inn, CAIN from a distance noticed Holloway talking to a local man, for about thirty (30) minutes.

From Watson’s 302…paraphrased:

Watson was at the beach with Natalee during the afternoon. Three MB girls waved to a group of individuals at the beach of the adjacent resort. These girls had met the girls the previous day on a ‘Tattoo’ cruise. Holloway did not go as she went snorkeling, but was intrigued with what the others said. Watson would not have been surprised if Natalee had met  the individuals from the adjacent resort sometime Sunday afternoon.

http://www.hollowaycase.com/archive/index.htm



Thanks for the link… Buckeye


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: private eye on January 09, 2008, 05:05:35 AM
What a bunch of BS! This whole "Dutch" Investiagtion stinks!!!!!

(http://img339.imageshack.us/img339/1913/hollandtj8.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)

That's putting it mildly *******! It is a complete and total joke....

Officials responsible for investigating offences


98. Under the Code of Criminal Procedure (art. 184) the persons charged with investigating offences are police officers and special police officers, insofar as the latter have been appointed by or on behalf of the Minister of Justice. Others persons charged with investigating offences are those who have been designated in special statutory regulations as being responsible for enforcing the provisions of the regulations, for ensuring their observance or for investigating the offences defined in them (art. 185). Persons who are competent to investigate are the procurators general, the public prosecutors and the local police chiefs. If they exercise this power, they are designated as investigating officials for the purposes of the Code of Criminal Procedure (art. 1). The change in the situation whereby the public prosecutor is no longer charged with investigating but is merely competent to investigate reflects the fact that investigations are the specific responsibility of the criminal investigations department of the police.


99. The public prosecutor or Chief Public Prosecutor supervises the investigation and may issue orders to persons charged with investigating or competent to investigate offences (art. 183, para. 1). As regards general supervision, however, the Chief Public Prosecutor is bound by any instructions given by the Procurator General (art. 4, para. 2, Judiciary Organization Ordinance; see also art. 14, Code of Criminal Procedure). This means that the Procurator General, as head of the Public Prosecutions Service, can issue guidelines concerning investigations and sentencing demands. Only on appeal can the Procurator General give direct instructions for a further investigation (art. 183, para. 3). The public prosecutor has control of the entire preparatory investigation, subject to the provisions in the new Code of Criminal Procedure regarding the intervention of the examining magistrate (art. 183, para. 2).


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: private eye on January 09, 2008, 05:19:05 AM
Interresting, Glenda/Renfro has crawled out from under her rock to post at RU tonight.  Wonder what's got her motivated to post?  Of course, she's posting crap blaming anything thay might have happened to Natalee on Beth for allowing her to go to a location where drinking was legal for 18yr olds.  :roll:


                    A travel advisory from someone in the know from Aruba.
So the very in the know, well educated, professional editor of a major publication in Aruba, who is married or lives with an Arubian, who was born and raised a US citizen, has now publicly announced to the world that it is not safe for young teens/adults to travel to Aruba absent parental supervision and recommended that no schools organize trips to Aruba, even with chaperone's, for their students or just graduated students. A travel advisory from someone in the know from Aruba. I wonder if she is considering taking a job with Safe Travels or is she just performing a much needed public service to protect the young people of the US from the dangers of Aruba. She certainly doesn't offer any apology, concern, or compassion about the US victims in Aruba though, she only seems to be incredulous that the US is stupid enough to trust their young in Aruba, and if they do and something happens to them, they simply are getting what they deserve.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: MumInOhio on January 09, 2008, 05:36:21 AM
From Joran's 6/9 PV:

After that the group of girls walked to the Sportsbar. In the Sportsbar I also saw to two acquaintances who were watching baseball. I greeted my two acquaintances and told them that I was doing fine too and that I would be going to "Carlos & Charlies" that night. My two acquaintances are named "Luis" and "Joshua". I regularly meet them at Carlos & Charlies. The last name of Luis is "BETANCOURT". I do not know the last name of Joshua. Luis BETANCOURT is a Venezuelan and according to me Joshua is Colombian but I don't know that for sure. After that I walked next to the group of girls and they said to me that I....When I called my father it was approximately 23.00 hours. I told my father that I was ready and if he could come and pick me up at "Mc Donalds". After that I had called my friend "Jaime CARASQUILLA" on his mobile phone. I do not know his phone number from memory but I have programmed his mobile phone number in the memory of my mobile phone under the name "Beto". I asked Beto what he was doing and whether he wanted to accompany me in going to Carlos & Charlies. Beto answered me that he was doing nothing but that he could not accompany me to Carlos & Charlies because he had to go to work the next day. Beto works with a transport company but I do not know the name of that company. After that I called Deepak KALPOE and asked him what he was doing and if he wanted to come with me to Carlos & Charlies. Deepak told me he was closing up "Inex" and that he would accompany me to Carlos & Charlies because he didn't have to go to work the next day.

To your question with whom I regularly go to Carlos & Charlies, I answer you that I regularly go there with "Freddy ZEDAN" and "Jaime CARASQUIA". Freddy is a Venezuelan and Jaime is a Columbian. The boy named "Koen GOTENBOS" also regularly goes out with us. The names of my three friends are in the memory of my mobile phone. Freddy is under the name "Fefi" and Koen under the name "Cul".


Beto....Betancourt...Venezualian...Columbian
THIS IS PURE GARBAGE...NO WAY...TOO MUCH COINCIDENCE...JORAN JUST CHANGED THEIR NAMES AND SWITCHED WHICH COUNTRY THEY WERE FROM!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: MumInOhio on January 09, 2008, 06:08:12 AM
Deepak 6/11 PV...this is where he says Joran bought a friend a drink!

We left Joran's place between 00:15 and 00:20 hours for "Carlos & Charlies". At that time my brother was driving. I was in the front seat and Joran was in the back. We arrived at "Carlos & Charlies" at approximately 00:30. My brother had parked the car on the parking lot behind "Carlos & Charlie's". We then walked towards "Carlos & Charlies". In front of "Carlos & Charlie's there was a group of girls. Joran noticed that these girls were also part of the group he met at the casino. Joran greeted the girls and then we walked into "Carlos & Charlie's. When we got inside we walked to the bar. At the bar Joran talked to a boy I know by face only. He had bought a drink for him and the boy. The drink is called "Carribean Motherfucker".

To your question as to what kind of drink that is, I can say the following. This drink is beer with a shot of "151" vodka in a small glass inside the glass of beer. Joran had asked us if we wanted one too, we hadn't taken him up on his offer. Then he bought us three "Yards" with whisky coke. He paid for the drinks.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: MumInOhio on January 09, 2008, 06:15:06 AM
Is this when Anita saw the underwear? This was June 8th and they were arrested 4 hours later...more coincidence.


From Deepak’s 6/10 PV

To your question as to when I last was in Joran's place the last time, I can state the following. I went to his place Wednesday June 8th, at approximately 22.45 hours, together with my brother Satish.

To your question as to what the purpose of this visit was, I can state the following. First of all because we had no power at our house, and secondly because Joran wanted to see the video of my brother's school trip.
To your question as to who was at the house, I can state the following. His parents were at the house and his little brother.

To your question as to how late we stayed there, I can state the following. We stayed there until about 02.00 hours in the morning.


Is the little brother Val...why was he not questioned until just before the last arrests?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: dennisintn on January 09, 2008, 06:25:31 AM
Hello everyone. I have been trying to think of something effective that can be done to help Beth keep the pressure on Aruba. Does anyone think this might be an effective tool?

If we had a good letter writer and an attorney to review the letter to assess liability, I wonder how effective it would be to write a letter to the major newspapers of each state basically to tell of Beth's treatment, the boycott, etc

My suggestion would be to turn the tables on Aruba and get a dream team and go to the top & cc Interpol:


At the direction of the President or the Attorney General, the FBI may use its statutory authority to investigate and arrest individuals for violating United States law, even if the FBI’s actions contravene customary international law. The President, acting through the Attorney General, has the inherent constitutional authority to deploy the FBI to investigate and arrest individuals for violating United States law, even if those actions contravene customary international law. Extraterritorial law enforcement activities that are authorized by domestic law are not barred even if they contravene unexecuted treaties or treaty provisions, such as Article 2(4) of the
United Nations Charter. An arrest that is inconsistent with international or foreign law does not violate the Fourth Amendment.

And I would include in that letter:

We read in Extracts of the Espionage and Sabotage Acts and other related federal criminal statutes: U.S. CODE, SECTION 1001, states that "Whoever, in any mater within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact, or makes any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or representations, or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any false, fictitious or fraudulent statement or entry, shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both


Now view this video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ymSWgZm6ivo

Dompig admits there was sexual assault to charge Joran, & Kalpoes and they should be charged, BUT they changed the investigation!
p. 193 (Beth's book) - November 2, 2005 Dompig on MSNBC - Rita Cosby show stated "They are gulty as hell."
Then if you read his various accusations he has accused Beth for interfering in the investigation to place blame on her, he has made accusations that Natalee bought drugs, he has made accusations that Natalee died of an overdose,
he has made accusations that Natalee was buried in the sea, that she ran away, that Beth made her disappear to collect insurance money. He intentionally withheld Texas Equu Search & FBI divers from searches and he has made accusations that the answers are in the United States with the Mountain Brook teens. When the truth is it was Dompig, Dennis Jacobs, Karin Janssen, Jan van der Straaten and unscrupulous judges that allowed the investigation to turn into a circus and crime that the world is still watching and wondering why the DUTCH are so flagrantly standing by and allowing the illegal conduct of the government and judiciary to prolificate. While tourism dollars are sinking Aruba's economy and their only hope is to make deals with illegal entities to keep Aruba afloat.

In addition file not only defamation lawsuits against Dompig, but also American's Julia Renfro and Charles Croes for their part in the cover-up with false and malicious intent to willfully cover-up and slander Beth Holloway and her daughter Natalee Holloway, but also under the Extracts of the Espionage and Sabotage Acts  - which is basically treason act of the U.S. Code.


Pierce the Evil and bring Justice for Natalee.

Well, that is what I would do.

ribbit


Great! Get this going now before we have a new President, new Atty. Gen. and new Secty. of State a year from now, who may or may not be inclined to get involved.

Someone going out of office has no reason not to get involved IMO and especially Ms. Rice who is very familiar with the delegations from Aruba and Beth Holloway.
i think we? should encourage candidates for all presidential candidates and congressional candidates to state their feelings about protecting or not protecting the interests of americans in foreign countries, tourist and commercial visits.  ignoring this problem has gone on long enough.  if places such as aruba even think a few political campaign contributions can buy a public officials action or inaction according to their needs, then that makes us no better than them.  the lives of americans abroad should not be thought of as for sale or use as bargaining power.
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: MumInOhio on January 09, 2008, 07:12:28 AM
Good Morning Nut44x4!

Can you please tell me where I can find the registry of Aruban businesses?
I am looking yo see who owns the Aruban newspapers. Also interested in that one out of Curacao.

Also looking for Max Arends myspace.

Thanks in advance.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: ldstlou on January 09, 2008, 07:20:36 AM
Good Morning Monkeys!!
CBB dressed me up so darned cute I just HAD to make a post!!
Thanks for updating me Klaas!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 09, 2008, 07:25:57 AM
Mornin' ..... I just got to this page, getting caught up.

I do not know if this is Max...it says Andres Arends
http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=190050894

Still looking for that business list...I know I have it somewhere.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: ldstlou on January 09, 2008, 07:30:31 AM
Again...I need help from some monkey...what time did it say that Natalee entered the casino?  What time did Joran come in?  What time was Paulus sitting at the table next to Natalee...I know...it isn't proven that it's him...just humor me. TIA

The timestamp is exactly 8:14 PM when the video was made of Jorna,PVDS and Natalee at the BJ table

Is there a timestamp when Natalee entered the casino?  Do we have that or is what I am talking about after her return trip from the bathroom or something?

Not too many days ago somebody posted that and discovered "proof" that the time on a photo had been changed. Can you search the last months posts?

I don't recall that discussion,was it on the front page? Looking back at the few seconds of footage they released it is just weird that Natalee is pointing in Joran's direction and in the same footage the other MB student is pointing at PVDS. You can clearly see the timestamp on this video. More than 2 hours after Paulus said he left the casino.

(http://img402.imageshack.us/img402/8677/casino3op4.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)


Superior Court
January, 2007

The possible involvement of Paulus with that could then be deducted from the file with the official reports of witnesses, amongst which two people suggested a contact existed between Paulus and Natalee Holloway the night of her disappearance, and a taped report (that was given by the Prosecutor in her final note 1 to the Court).  The taped information and his declaration that  he picked up Joran and Natalee by the McDonalds Palm Beach and brought them to the Holiday Inn, are clearly understood by the Dept. of Justice, and could in the judgement of this Superior Court, be considered as an indication of the involvement of Paulus in the disappearance of Natalee Holloway.”


Who was Joran's/Paulus's friend (Jorans age and part of the pimps, maybe?) whose father owned the security camera company for the casinos and hotels? Who has the knowledge to do time stamp changing? Also was this the same father that wouldn't let his son give a statement but came in for him instead?

Is Dompig now ahead of the camera company for the casinos./hotels now on Aruba? Seems to the "victory" goes the spoils all around Aruba.

Of course this goes along with the rumors of Joran/Paulus, K2 attempting to change the times of cell phones and computers.

Time only stands still for Natalee now. J4N



Who has access to these tapes to change the time stamp to this extent? Posner? the  company who does the surveillance in the casinos? Someone had to order it changed or it was changed without Posner knowing it?

This is driving me nuts. What are those things laying on the table in front of paulus? Something green and then something else? At first I thought maybe cigarettes and lighter..but don't think so. This is also a great image. You can see the girl to jorans right pointing to paulus and joran looking at him...again...I am sure they were discussing that paulus was jorans dad.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: MumInOhio on January 09, 2008, 07:35:38 AM
Mornin' ..... I just got to this page, getting caught up.

I do not know if this is Max...it says Andres Arends
http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=190050894

Still looking for that business list...I know I have it somewhere.


Thanks Nut...don't think that's it...this one is supposed to have those stupid hand signals on it. A search sent me to Klaas' last posts :lol: where would I start!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: MumInOhio on January 09, 2008, 08:02:35 AM
Morning ldstlou....I wonder if it's the 'i-pod' that Joran told one of the MB girls he had on the table.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: kgwallace88 on January 09, 2008, 08:04:44 AM
Has anyone seen any updates from Kyle?  I so look forward to reading what he writes but I haven't seen anything since sunday.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: MumInOhio on January 09, 2008, 08:09:55 AM
Anyone know anything about this person? It popped up on a Natalee blog and all I can find is about 20, male and from a link I went to, could be related to Hendrik Croes. (Sorry still can't read Pap)..the link does not work. TIA

Shajir Croes ~ tickle http://connect.tickle.com/photo/index.html?id=cNdzWji4h9KWexK2



No, sorry 88


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 09, 2008, 08:23:50 AM
Nope.....guess I am not much help this morning, lol.
I do know that Tickle no longer exists.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: kgwallace88 on January 09, 2008, 08:25:14 AM
Does anyone think that means something that we haven't heard anything from them???  Sorry guys just getting anxious! :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: MumInOhio on January 09, 2008, 08:26:52 AM
Nope.....guess I am not much help this morning, lol.
I do know that Tickle no longer exists.



LOL...that would explain why they are no longer available!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: MumInOhio on January 09, 2008, 08:29:06 AM
Does anyone think that means something that we haven't heard anything from them???  Sorry guys just getting anxious! :roll:


Getting a little anxious myself, but not sure what it means.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: ldstlou on January 09, 2008, 09:12:33 AM
Morning ldstlou....I wonder if it's the 'i-pod' that Joran told one of the MB girls he had on the table.

hmmm. in front of Paulus? the green is his chips, but there is something in front and behind his chips it looks like. Nothing inportant..just couldn't figure out what it was. From my experience, you can't have phones on the table...I just was trying to figure out what he had sitting there.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: ldstlou on January 09, 2008, 09:13:32 AM
Does anyone think that means something that we haven't heard anything from them???  Sorry guys just getting anxious! :roll:


Getting a little anxious myself, but not sure what it means.

me too.
Morning by the way Mum!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 09, 2008, 09:17:47 AM
Morning ldstlou....I wonder if it's the 'i-pod' that Joran told one of the MB girls he had on the table.

hmmm. in front of Paulus? the green is his chips, but there is something in front and behind his chips it looks like. Nothing inportant..just couldn't figure out what it was. From my experience, you can't have phones on the table...I just was trying to figure out what he had sitting there.


There was about a 3-day discussion here on that a while ago...not sure how it turned out. As usual, I can't remember.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: wreck on January 09, 2008, 09:20:50 AM
Does anyone think that means something that we haven't heard anything from them???  Sorry guys just getting anxious! :roll:


Getting a little anxious myself, but not sure what it means.

me too.
Morning by the way Mum!!
Maybe it's a GOOD sign. I would think even if they found something VERY encouraging -- they would continue to check out the entire grid just in case to be thorough since they are already there. This is the last chance. MOO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 09, 2008, 09:26:03 AM
http://news.diario-aruba.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=279&Itemid=30
Ola fuerte a benta turista bulgaro den laman bruto
Diario write up on the dead man at coastline. Several good photos of the rugged coast up close.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: Observer on January 09, 2008, 09:27:17 AM
You can see the most recent talk about the "Man"(PVDS)in the casino here. Look a few pages ahead for a close up of the item in front of him.

Have a good day all!!

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?action=profile;u=803;sa=showPosts;start=540


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: MumInOhio on January 09, 2008, 09:31:28 AM
Ldstlou I had just read that about the ipod when you asked that this morning. It was in one of the MB girls 302s. Wonder why one would want to take one to a casino? And if it wasn't an ipod what else could it be.

Lala's...where is lala's this morning...some more on GVC and his daddy. You need to scroll right down to see where daddy was interrogated and what the charges were against Geoffrey.

Thanks getagrip!

http://getagripmonkey.blogspot.com/2006_04_16_archive.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: BUCKSHOT on January 09, 2008, 09:33:18 AM
5th Suspect, in my opinion, has to be one of two people: Joran - Paulus.

Concerning the casino video, in my mind, I am unable to say, with 100% certainty, that Paulus was sitting at the table.  It sucks that the view of that person is obstructed a bit.  When the person bends forward into better view, it appears as though they are younger than Paulus, with darker hair.  Also, there seems to be be no interaction, whatsoever, between this unknown person and Joran.  A father and son would at least have minimal interaction, easily spotted by a camera, despite the lack of audio.  However, the things that make me consider it being Paulus are: (a) the lack of hair in the crown area of the head, and (b) same type of outfit worn by Paulus - white collared shirt and watch.  I could be totally wrong about it not being Paulus.  Keep this in mind.

If it is Paulus, what would it do for the case? It would prove him to be lying about his whereabouts at that particular time of evening.  I do not think it would imply his being present when Natalee expired.  I think everyone has safely concluded that his involvement was in the disposal plans and subsequent cover-up.  I am curious as to what it would do for the investigation if it was determined to be Paulus sitting at the casino table at the same time that Joran and Natalee were.

Concerning witness and/or suspect statements, I do feel that status of individuals were manipulated so as to steer usage of statements, for possible later dates.  People were allowed to lie to the investigators, depending upon their designated status.  That is strange to me.

About the whole investigation - If the higher ups, included in the cover-up, sought to railroad the investigation, it is hard to understand the remaining dynamics of the investigation.  Police were searching the island and trying to find clues.  If a policeman found a clue, physical evidence or conflicts in story, he/she would turn it over through chain of command.  That person, who discovered the evidence, would know that they discovered the evidence.  When that policeman saw it go through chain of command, without consequence, human nature would have raised an eyebrow.  The entire police force would have to be in the cover-up, OR the honest polieman, who had discovered evidence, is simply too scared to challenge his superiors about integrity.  Did that make any sense at all ??





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: BUCKSHOT on January 09, 2008, 09:39:36 AM
Assume the worst for a moment - a body is not recovered.
What will happen next with this investigation ??

It is clear as day that the file, and its contents, will not leave custody of those who ran, and railroaded, the investigation.  What will happen next ??

I am not clear on how true answers will be discovered, as to the events that transpired on that fateful evening.  Other than people involved speaking about it down the road, I simply can not see any resolution, whatsoever. Am I wrong?

This will parallel the Kennedy assasination? No one will know for sure.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on January 09, 2008, 09:50:30 AM
5th Suspect, in my opinion, has to be one of two people: Joran - Paulus.

Concerning the casino video, in my mind, I am unable to say, with 100% certainty, that Paulus was sitting at the table.  It sucks that the view of that person is obstructed a bit.  When the person bends forward into better view, it appears as though they are younger than Paulus, with darker hair.  Also, there seems to be be no interaction, whatsoever, between this unknown person and Joran.  A father and son would at least have minimal interaction, easily spotted by a camera, despite the lack of audio.  However, the things that make me consider it being Paulus are: (a) the lack of hair in the crown area of the head, and (b) same type of outfit worn by Paulus - white collared shirt and watch.  I could be totally wrong about it not being Paulus.  Keep this in mind.

If it is Paulus, what would it do for the case? It would prove him to be lying about his whereabouts at that particular time of evening.  I do not think it would imply his being present when Natalee expired.  I think everyone has safely concluded that his involvement was in the disposal plans and subsequent cover-up.  I am curious as to what it would do for the investigation if it was determined to be Paulus sitting at the casino table at the same time that Joran and Natalee were.

Concerning witness and/or suspect statements, I do feel that status of individuals were manipulated so as to steer usage of statements, for possible later dates.  People were allowed to lie to the investigators, depending upon their designated status.  That is strange to me.

About the whole investigation - If the higher ups, included in the cover-up, sought to railroad the investigation, it is hard to understand the remaining dynamics of the investigation.  Police were searching the island and trying to find clues.  If a policeman found a clue, physical evidence or conflicts in story, he/she would turn it over through chain of command.  That person, who discovered the evidence, would know that they discovered the evidence.  When that policeman saw it go through chain of command, without consequence, human nature would have raised an eyebrow.  The entire police force would have to be in the cover-up, OR the honest polieman, who had discovered evidence, is simply too scared to challenge his superiors about integrity.  Did that make any sense at all ??



Does make sense, Buckshot. Why was Paulus entrance and exit to the casino not released? Why was a obstructed piece of the tape showing the man that looks like Paulus released? There would have been cameras from every possible angle in the casino. His movements should be heavily documented.

If that is Paulus and he did lie it would make no difference to the Dutch investigators. They, and the Dutch judges, can't manage to string two pieces of evidence together. or don't want to.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: private eye on January 09, 2008, 10:13:25 AM
Interresting, Glenda/Renfro has crawled out from under her rock to post at RU tonight.  Wonder what's got her motivated to post?  Of course, she's posting crap blaming anything thay might have happened to Natalee on Beth for allowing her to go to a location where drinking was legal for 18yr olds.  :roll:

Must have been a really big rock. :roll:

Did you mean rock or is that a typo?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: klaasend on January 09, 2008, 10:28:21 AM
Here's the link to the Aruba Chamber of Commerce but the Registry link isn't working for me right now.  This is where you can search businesses:

http://www.arubachamber.com/



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: ldstlou on January 09, 2008, 10:29:42 AM
Ldstlou I had just read that about the ipod when you asked that this morning. It was in one of the MB girls 302s. Wonder why one would want to take one to a casino? And if it wasn't an ipod what else could it be.

Lala's...where is lala's this morning...some more on GVC and his daddy. You need to scroll right down to see where daddy was interrogated and what the charges were against Geoffrey.

Thanks getagrip!

http://getagripmonkey.blogspot.com/2006_04_16_archive.html


I gotcha Mum, thanks! It does look like it could be an ipod.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: MumInOhio on January 09, 2008, 10:39:11 AM
Here's the link to the Aruba Chamber of Commerce but the Registry link isn't working for me right now.  This is where you can search businesses:

http://www.arubachamber.com/




Thank you Klaas....you don't happen to have Max Arends myspace handy do you? Google sent me to your posts this morning....LOL ...it would take me the rest of my life to find it there!   TIA


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 09, 2008, 10:43:02 AM
Morning monkeys all!

Who is the girl sitting beside Joran in the casino vidoe that points to Paulus?  Do we know her name?

Mum
I am here, as I said before, GVC was not arrested until much, much later.  Thanks for the link.

PI
I guess I meant rock....or...uh...well use your imagination.

5th suspect
There have been 2 code talkers that have contended that Paulus id the 5th.  I have spent countless hours trying to connect the dots with him...you would need to establish that he hosted a party that night and that he left said party at some point to help Joran and that he met Natalee before the night in the casino.  Connect those dots and you have your 5th suspect.  I have long said that if it is Paulus maybe he was at home with someone else...and I will just leave it at that and not name any names.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 09, 2008, 10:46:38 AM
5th Suspect, in my opinion, has to be one of two people: Joran - Paulus.

Concerning the casino video, in my mind, I am unable to say, with 100% certainty, that Paulus was sitting at the table.  It sucks that the view of that person is obstructed a bit.  When the person bends forward into better view, it appears as though they are younger than Paulus, with darker hair.  Also, there seems to be be no interaction, whatsoever, between this unknown person and Joran.  A father and son would at least have minimal interaction, easily spotted by a camera, despite the lack of audio.  However, the things that make me consider it being Paulus are: (a) the lack of hair in the crown area of the head, and (b) same type of outfit worn by Paulus - white collared shirt and watch.  I could be totally wrong about it not being Paulus.  Keep this in mind.

If it is Paulus, what would it do for the case? It would prove him to be lying about his whereabouts at that particular time of evening.  I do not think it would imply his being present when Natalee expired.  I think everyone has safely concluded that his involvement was in the disposal plans and subsequent cover-up.  I am curious as to what it would do for the investigation if it was determined to be Paulus sitting at the casino table at the same time that Joran and Natalee were.

Concerning witness and/or suspect statements, I do feel that status of individuals were manipulated so as to steer usage of statements, for possible later dates.  People were allowed to lie to the investigators, depending upon their designated status.  That is strange to me.

About the whole investigation - If the higher ups, included in the cover-up, sought to railroad the investigation, it is hard to understand the remaining dynamics of the investigation.  Police were searching the island and trying to find clues.  If a policeman found a clue, physical evidence or conflicts in story, he/she would turn it over through chain of command.  That person, who discovered the evidence, would know that they discovered the evidence.  When that policeman saw it go through chain of command, without consequence, human nature would have raised an eyebrow.  The entire police force would have to be in the cover-up, OR the honest polieman, who had discovered evidence, is simply too scared to challenge his superiors about integrity.  Did that make any sense at all ??





Who was there?  Dennis Jacobs, Jan van der Straaten, Rudy Croes.  All the dirty hands were present and accounted for.  Beth indicates the shenanigans that took place in her book.  These 3 together could make anything happen.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: klaasend on January 09, 2008, 10:49:06 AM
Here's the link to the Aruba Chamber of Commerce but the Registry link isn't working for me right now.  This is where you can search businesses:

http://www.arubachamber.com/




Thank you Klaas....you don't happen to have Max Arends myspace handy do you? Google sent me to your posts this morning....LOL ...it would take me the rest of my life to find it there!   TIA

http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=244626398


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: MumInOhio on January 09, 2008, 10:51:35 AM
Morning monkeys all!

Who is the girl sitting beside Joran in the casino vidoe that points to Paulus?  Do we know her name?

Mum
I am here, as I said before, GVC was not arrested until much, much later.  Thanks for the link.

PI
I guess I meant rock....or...uh...well use your imagination.

5th suspect
There have been 2 code talkers that have contended that Paulus id the 5th.  I have spent countless hours trying to connect the dots with him...you would need to establish that he hosted a party that night and that he left said party at some point to help Joran and that he met Natalee before the night in the casino.  Connect those dots and you have your 5th suspect.  I have long said that if it is Paulus maybe he was at home with someone else...and I will just leave it at that and not name any names.
[/b]


Good Morning....Just saw a post on this, but didn't copy as there wasn't a source listed just the date.  Something about a search and conflict of interest as he was staying with Paulus and Anita. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Peaches on January 09, 2008, 11:13:33 AM
I did it again.. F'd up another quote.. I gotta go to bed. I have alot of work ahead of me.. perhaps a NEW job on the horizon..  Gonna be a gramma.. and hit with a divorce ! Merry Chritmas and Happy New Year to Angie !
 I WILL survive this dammit.  I know I have it in me..   :2doh: 

 Good night everyone..  HUGS ans sweet dreams..  :smt052

YOU WILL SURVIVE ANGIE!  We all love you and you will be in my thoughts and prayers.  Take care of yourself.  nite!

Yeah, what she said.  Love you Angie.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: Observer on January 09, 2008, 11:27:41 AM
Buckshot:

Although there is only a few seconds of video in the casino,it appears to me like there may be interaction between the "Man" and Joran. Right before the girl points in the guys direction it appears that Joran is conversing with him.


http://abcnews.go.com/Video/playerIndex?id=3922731&affil=wlne

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2432.msg315480#msg315480


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 09, 2008, 11:30:27 AM
What a bunch of BS! This whole "Dutch" Investiagtion stinks!!!!!

(http://img339.imageshack.us/img339/1913/hollandtj8.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)

That's putting it mildly *******! It is a complete and total joke....

Officials responsible for investigating offences


98. Under the Code of Criminal Procedure (art. 184) the persons charged with investigating offences are police officers and special police officers, insofar as the latter have been appointed by or on behalf of the Minister of Justice. Others persons charged with investigating offences are those who have been designated in special statutory regulations as being responsible for enforcing the provisions of the regulations, for ensuring their observance or for investigating the offences defined in them (art. 185). Persons who are competent to investigate are the procurators general, the public prosecutors and the local police chiefs. If they exercise this power, they are designated as investigating officials for the purposes of the Code of Criminal Procedure (art. 1). The change in the situation whereby the public prosecutor is no longer charged with investigating but is merely competent to investigate reflects the fact that investigations are the specific responsibility of the criminal investigations department of the police.


99. The public prosecutor or Chief Public Prosecutor supervises the investigation and may issue orders to persons charged with investigating or competent to investigate offences (art. 183, para. 1). As regards general supervision, however, the Chief Public Prosecutor is bound by any instructions given by the Procurator General (art. 4, para. 2, Judiciary Organization Ordinance; see also art. 14, Code of Criminal Procedure). This means that the Procurator General, as head of the Public Prosecutions Service, can issue guidelines concerning investigations and sentencing demands. Only on appeal can the Procurator General give direct instructions for a further investigation (art. 183, para. 3). The public prosecutor has control of the entire preparatory investigation, subject to the provisions in the new Code of Criminal Procedure regarding the intervention of the examining magistrate (art. 183, para. 2).

Good Morning PI and ... thank you.

Dutch law dictates that the Prosecutor is in charge of the investigation but ... it appears that this law was disregarded/manipulated in the Natalee Holloway case.  Joran and Paulus had to be distanced from implication.  This implied cooperation between various ministers of the Dutch/Aruban administration as well as the judiciary.

Janet

+++++++++++++++


Amigoe
September 30, 2005


http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/?p=1694

Many Aruban people are very angry with Twitty and are afraid that her constant appeals against Aruba would have a negative effect on the tourism. Even though this does not reflect in the figures, the government does keep a finger on the pulse. Croes does not consider taking measures against Twitty yet, but does not rule out the possibility to shut her up in the future. The Dutch government was asked to diplomatically support Aruba in this matter.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 09, 2008, 11:37:11 AM
Buckshot:

Although there is only a few seconds of video in the casino,it appears to me like there may be interaction between the "Man" and Joran. Right before the girl points in the guys direction it appears that Joran is conversing with him.


http://abcnews.go.com/Video/playerIndex?id=3922731&affil=wlne

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2432.msg315480#msg315480


Who is the girl that points to Paulus in the video?  Anyone?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: BUCKSHOT on January 09, 2008, 11:49:27 AM





[/quote]

Who was there?  Dennis Jacobs, Jan van der Straaten, Rudy Croes.  All the dirty hands were present and accounted for.  Beth indicates the shenanigans that took place in her book.  These 3 together could make anything happen.
[/quote]

what about those who found belt, bloody mattress, arm bone, duct tape with hairs, blood on car seats, overheard things, etc... - these people(NOT DJ, JanVDS,RC) would know what they saw or heard, yet never saw results, proper testing, etc. wouldn't they be suspicious, themselves, about those higher in command than themselves that did nothing with evidence handed over.  i can not imagine those in charge to instruct a base level policeman, "if you find something, or are on to something...do not turn it over to anyone else except DJ,JanVDS,RC and do not discuss it at all or else you will face consequences (lose your job, pension, and be refused work privelages indefinitely on this island)."



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 09, 2008, 11:51:15 AM






Who was there?  Dennis Jacobs, Jan van der Straaten, Rudy Croes.  All the dirty hands were present and accounted for.  Beth indicates the shenanigans that took place in her book.  These 3 together could make anything happen.
[/quote]

what about those who found belt, bloody mattress, arm bone, duct tape with hairs, blood on car seats, overheard things, etc... - these people(NOT DJ, JanVDS,RC) would know what they saw or heard, yet never saw results, proper testing, etc. wouldn't they be suspicious, themselves, about those higher in command than themselves that did nothing with evidence handed over.  i can not imagine those in charge to instruct a base level policeman, "if you find something, or are on to something...do not turn it over to anyone else except DJ,JanVDS,RC and do not discuss it at all or else you will face consequences (lose your job, pension, and be refused work privelages indefinitely on this island)."


[/quote]

Hard to believe, isn't it?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: dennisintn on January 09, 2008, 11:53:13 AM
persistence has posted finally.  rough seas and eq. failure blamed.  they will update shortly.
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: klaasend on January 09, 2008, 11:56:29 AM
persistence has posted finally.  rough seas and eq. failure blamed.  they will update shortly.
dennisintn


Thanks Dennis!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: AZSunny on January 09, 2008, 12:04:00 PM
persistence has posted finally.  rough seas and eq. failure blamed.  they will update shortly.
dennisintn


Thanks Dennis!

Thank goodness!!  whew...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: NM on January 09, 2008, 12:06:55 PM
I did it again.. F'd up another quote.. I gotta go to bed. I have alot of work ahead of me.. perhaps a NEW job on the horizon..  Gonna be a gramma.. and hit with a divorce ! Merry Chritmas and Happy New Year to Angie !
 I WILL survive this dammit.  I know I have it in me..   :2doh: 

 Good night everyone..  HUGS ans sweet dreams..  :smt052

YOU WILL SURVIVE ANGIE!  We all love you and you will be in my thoughts and prayers.  Take care of yourself.  nite!

Yeah, what she said.  Love you Angie.
What Peaches said.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: klaasend on January 09, 2008, 12:14:31 PM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/1LOCK.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 09, 2008, 12:16:38 PM
Is internet connection on ships via satellite? 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: Observer on January 09, 2008, 12:21:14 PM
Is internet connection on ships via satellite? 

I am pretty sure they have a satellite connection for internet.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 09, 2008, 12:29:02 PM
Is internet connection on ships via satellite? 

I am pretty sure they have a satellite connection for internet.

Thanks, *******...I thought I recalled that info from a cruise we'd taken, but we never used ithe internet while aboard.  I do know that Jet Blue uses satellite for inflight TV reception.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: klaasend on January 09, 2008, 12:37:36 PM
Is internet connection on ships via satellite? 

I am pretty sure they have a satellite connection for internet.

Yes and if they could have a satellite connection so could others including the Gottenbos :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 09, 2008, 12:48:28 PM
Is internet connection on ships via satellite? 

I am pretty sure they have a satellite connection for internet.

Yes and if they could have a satellite connection so could others including the Gottenbos :wink:

So you could be on a computer and still be 3 miles out on a boat. MOO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: klaasend on January 09, 2008, 12:49:54 PM
Is internet connection on ships via satellite? 

I am pretty sure they have a satellite connection for internet.

Yes and if they could have a satellite connection so could others including the Gottenbos :wink:

So you could be on a computer and still be 3 miles out on a boat. MOO

Yep.  Not saying they did but it's very possible.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: klaasend on January 09, 2008, 12:53:25 PM
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/04/060423223123.htm

Low Cost Internet Access At Sea


Up- and down-link antennas. (Credits: Wired Ocean Ltd.)ScienceDaily (Apr. 24, 2006) — Through a project supported by the European Space Agency, the UK-based company Wired Ocean Ltd can now provide enhanced Internet access for ships at sea at a much lower cost than was previously possible.

Although satellite links at sea are quite common, the speed of data transmission for most users is very low, from 600 bps to 64 kbps, with around 10 kbps being a typical speed. This, combined with usage costs of around € 20 per megabyte, has created an environment in which many ship owners cannot reliably access the Internet, or use it regularly.

(snipped)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: klaasend on January 09, 2008, 01:00:16 PM
http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/19/venezuelans-set-new-wifi-distance-record-237-miles

Venezuelans set new WiFi distance record: 237 miles
Posted Jun 19th 2007 7:01AM by Nilay Patel
Filed under: Wireless, Networking



It's been a while since we've seen people muck around with long-distance WiFi -- not only are DIY solutions like cantennas possibly illegal, sexier technologies like WiMAX have emerged to better serve those long-distance IP needs. WiFi's flame burns on in Latin America, however, where researcher Ermanno Pietrosemoli has managed to shoot an 802.11 signal 382 kilometers (237 miles) between two mountains in the Venezuelan Andes. Pietrosemoli, who is president of Latin American networking association Escuela Latinoamerica de Redes, used some of Intel's long-range WiFi tech and $60 worth of Linksys hardware to achieve throughput of 3 Mbps in each direction and beat the former record of 310 kilometers (192 miles). Pietrosemoli hopes to use the tech to serve developing nations, but seeing as we barely get 3 Mbps in our WiFi-choked apartment building with the laptop sitting next to the router, we're hoping he lets us in on the secret as well.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: Observer on January 09, 2008, 01:05:44 PM
Venezuelans set new WiFi distance record: 237 miles  :shock:  :shock: :o

Thats incredible!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: klaasend on January 09, 2008, 01:08:49 PM
Back to working and lurking  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: Vicki on January 09, 2008, 01:15:14 PM
Klaas, Can you get me a Valentine avitar please? Thanks...also in case some ppl dont read the travel thread, we are having tote bags made up togive away at the upcoming shows....any donations would be great. Thanks


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: klaasend on January 09, 2008, 01:23:50 PM
Klaas, Can you get me a Valentine avitar please? Thanks...also in case some ppl dont read the travel thread, we are having tote bags made up togive away at the upcoming shows....any donations would be great. Thanks

Hi Vicki - I have alot of work to do today but I'll leave your request for CBB ok?  She does much better work than I do anyway on the avatars.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: Observer on January 09, 2008, 01:25:24 PM
Hi everyone! It's my lunch break so I jumped on.  I didn't get a chance to get on last night.  John told me the satellite was out on the boat from the storm.  They were docked this morning trying to fix it.  Now that the internet connection is up, I am assuming it is fixed...

In answer to the Grid question.  I asked John specifically about it this morning.  He couldn't give me a length on each grid in that the way they are set up they overlap.  He said the approximate total of the grids is over 50 miles.... The third grid being an approximate 23 miles... They were still in grid 2 last time I asked.

Anyway, Pearlin is oh so right in that we have to have Patience! This process is not exactly made for speed! :)
Hope this helps.  Oh, and I am sure very soon Kyle will update the blog so keep a lookout!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: Magnolia on January 09, 2008, 01:40:38 PM
Venezuelans set new WiFi distance record: 237 miles  :shock:  :shock: :o

Thats incredible!

I think to the South American drug culture communication
technology is very important.  They stay abreast of the
latest and best and most secure methods of communication.
It is an important part of their business to stay one step
ahead of the norm and they have people who work specifically
at that aspect of the business.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: Vicki on January 09, 2008, 01:43:47 PM
Klaas, Can you get me a Valentine avitar please? Thanks...also in case some ppl dont read the travel thread, we are having tote bags made up togive away at the upcoming shows....any donations would be great. Thanks

Hi Vicki - I have alot of work to do today but I'll leave your request for CBB ok?  She does much better work than I do anyway on the avatars.


Ok no problem...Thanks and have a really great day.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on January 09, 2008, 01:51:02 PM
Klaas, Can you get me a Valentine avitar please? Thanks...also in case some ppl dont read the travel thread, we are having tote bags made up togive away at the upcoming shows....any donations would be great. Thanks

(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/Valentine%20Avatar/vvk.gif)
http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/Valentine%20Avatar/vvk.gif

 :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 09, 2008, 01:58:54 PM
Did anyone ever find out who the girl is pointing to Paulus in the casinos video? TIA


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on January 09, 2008, 02:00:10 PM
Do you know how to get the avatar up and going Vicki? I can't do it for you, but Klaas can and there are instructions to add an avatar in the Monkey Lounge.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: ldstlou on January 09, 2008, 02:07:00 PM
Do you know how to get the avatar up and going Vicki? I can't do it for you, but Klaas can and there are instructions to add an avatar in the Monkey Lounge.

Wow CBB, you are looking quite sexy in your Valentine avi!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: ldstlou on January 09, 2008, 02:13:23 PM
I heard some great news!!
Beth is going to be doing a show on Oprah soon!! Not sure of the date yet, it should be announced in a few days.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: dennisintn on January 09, 2008, 02:16:18 PM
I heard some great news!!
Beth is going to be doing a show on Oprah soon!! Not sure of the date yet, it should be announced in a few days.
great news, idstlou, be sure and post the day and time as soon as you get it.
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: ldstlou on January 09, 2008, 02:17:20 PM
I heard some great news!!
Beth is going to be doing a show on Oprah soon!! Not sure of the date yet, it should be announced in a few days.
great news, idstlou, be sure and post the day and time as soon as you get it.
dennisintn

Will do. Should be announced in the media soon I think.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 09, 2008, 02:26:12 PM
Cool.....guess I will have to break my long standing house rule and watch Oprah.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: ldstlou on January 09, 2008, 02:27:01 PM
Cool.....guess I will have to break my long standing house rule and watch Oprah.

lol..yes you do!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 09, 2008, 02:30:26 PM
Did anyone ever find out who the girl is pointing to Paulus in the casinos video? TIA

I've seen your posts asking, and wish I could tell you.  I think those present at the table had been discussed a while back...I just don't remember.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 09, 2008, 02:31:22 PM
Does anyone know the name of the girl sitting next to Joran in the casino video that points to the man across the table?   :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: ldstlou on January 09, 2008, 02:32:41 PM
Did anyone ever find out who the girl is pointing to Paulus in the casinos video? TIA

I've seen your posts asking, and wish I could tell you.  I think those present at the table had been discussed a while back...I just don't remember.

I don't know either..so sorry.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 09, 2008, 02:57:10 PM
I can't get the video to play, so no I don't know, sorry.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: SunnyinTX on January 09, 2008, 03:35:50 PM
I did it again.. F'd up another quote.. I gotta go to bed. I have alot of work ahead of me.. perhaps a NEW job on the horizon..  Gonna be a gramma.. and hit with a divorce ! Merry Chritmas and Happy New Year to Angie !
 I WILL survive this dammit.  I know I have it in me..   :2doh: 

 Good night everyone..  HUGS ans sweet dreams..  :smt052

YOU WILL SURVIVE ANGIE!  We all love you and you will be in my thoughts and prayers.  Take care of yourself.  nite!

Yeah, what she said.  Love you Angie.
What Peaches said.

add me to the what they said's...hang in there Angie and remember we are here for you...big hugs coming your way


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on January 09, 2008, 03:41:04 PM
I heard some great news!!
Beth is going to be doing a show on Oprah soon!! Not sure of the date yet, it should be announced in a few days.

Great!  Thanks Lisa and keep us posted


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on January 09, 2008, 03:43:37 PM
Cool.....guess I will have to break my long standing house rule and watch Oprah.

ditto for me...I stopped watching Oprah when I saw her in action at the Astrodome in Houston while I was volunteering after Katrina...what you see is NOT what you get with her for sure....but to see/hear and support Beth I will swallow it and watch.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on January 09, 2008, 03:45:54 PM
Does anyone know the name of the girl sitting next to Joran in the casino video that points to the man across the table?   :roll:

I don't Lala's...sorry


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on January 09, 2008, 03:48:01 PM
HELLO????  It looks like once again I am posting to myself...OK..I'll go back to lurking


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: klaasend on January 09, 2008, 03:48:24 PM
On Hodges website:

http://forensicthoughtprints.com/default.aspx?200819

January 9, 2008
Journal—Trips to Aruba Linked to Search for Body (between 12/18/07 and 1/2/08)

Ent

December 18th

I arrived in Aruba on the afternoon of December 18th. Shortly I met with Tim Miller (Texas Equusearch) and Louis Shaefer who is the lead sponsor of the search (along with his project manager, Tim Trahan)—and who had arranged for several expedition firms to participate in the search including J.D. Silvetti (who provided the search boat, the Persistence).  Louis had just flown in for the first time also and immediately suggested not long after dark that we drive out to Fisherman’s Huts—almost certainly where the three suspects took off from the shore with Natalee’s body in a recently stolen cage. (More on specifics of that story below).

(snipped)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: klaasend on January 09, 2008, 03:53:14 PM
On Hodges website:

http://forensicthoughtprints.com/default.aspx?200819

January 9, 2008
Journal—Trips to Aruba Linked to Search for Body (between 12/18/07 and 1/2/08)

Ent

December 18th

I arrived in Aruba on the afternoon of December 18th. Shortly I met with Tim Miller (Texas Equusearch) and Louis Shaefer who is the lead sponsor of the search (along with his project manager, Tim Trahan)—and who had arranged for several expedition firms to participate in the search including J.D. Silvetti (who provided the search boat, the Persistence).  Louis had just flown in for the first time also and immediately suggested not long after dark that we drive out to Fisherman’s Huts—almost certainly where the three suspects took off from the shore with Natalee’s body in a recently stolen cage. (More on specifics of that story below).

(snipped)



The fisherman described the cage as made of 3/8 inch iron (such as used in concrete reinforcing—“rebar”) with a frame size approximately 5 ½ feet by 4 feet by 17 inches.  He described it as a large fishing cage with frame wrapped in chicken wire (hexagonal openings) having an opening in one panel which allowed them to trap fish. He felt like it would take two men to manage cage. It would lay low in the nearby fishing boat. He recalls the iron stain in the grass when the cage had gone missing—this almost directly behind his hut on the south side of huts.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: klaasend on January 09, 2008, 03:57:36 PM
On Hodges website:

http://forensicthoughtprints.com/default.aspx?200819

January 9, 2008
Journal—Trips to Aruba Linked to Search for Body (between 12/18/07 and 1/2/08)

Ent

December 18th

I arrived in Aruba on the afternoon of December 18th. Shortly I met with Tim Miller (Texas Equusearch) and Louis Shaefer who is the lead sponsor of the search (along with his project manager, Tim Trahan)—and who had arranged for several expedition firms to participate in the search including J.D. Silvetti (who provided the search boat, the Persistence).  Louis had just flown in for the first time also and immediately suggested not long after dark that we drive out to Fisherman’s Huts—almost certainly where the three suspects took off from the shore with Natalee’s body in a recently stolen cage. (More on specifics of that story below).

(snipped)



The fisherman described the cage as made of 3/8 inch iron (such as used in concrete reinforcing—“rebar”) with a frame size approximately 5 ½ feet by 4 feet by 17 inches.  He described it as a large fishing cage with frame wrapped in chicken wire (hexagonal openings) having an opening in one panel which allowed them to trap fish. He felt like it would take two men to manage cage. It would lay low in the nearby fishing boat. He recalls the iron stain in the grass when the cage had gone missing—this almost directly behind his hut on the south side of huts.


As I write this, the ocean search is now getting to deeper waters where the body most likely is. The boat has demonstrated excellent capability to spot underwater targets. Various anonymous tips have been received about the location of Natalee’s body. One of the most intriguing has been a tip from a reported friend of Deepak who said that Deepak confessed one evening while using drugs together that they had dropped the body 10 miles out into the ocean.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 09, 2008, 04:06:09 PM
You mean the cage that was never stolen  :wink: ?

Well this is interesting re: dope infested Deepak and his blabberings......mmmmm.......
I like it!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: klaasend on January 09, 2008, 04:17:26 PM
Back to working and lurking.  Interresting read at Hodges website  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: Spock on January 09, 2008, 04:19:44 PM
One of the most intriguing has been a tip from a reported friend of Deepak who said that Deepak confessed one evening while using drugs together that they had dropped the body 10 miles out into the ocean.

Ten miles out the depth is 3000 meters. I don't think persistence is looking that far out. The water is over 9000 feet deep and the surface and underwater currents run to Panama.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: Kimmy53 on January 09, 2008, 04:24:05 PM
On Hodges website:

http://forensicthoughtprints.com/default.aspx?200819

January 9, 2008
Journal—Trips to Aruba Linked to Search for Body (between 12/18/07 and 1/2/08)

Ent

December 18th

I arrived in Aruba on the afternoon of December 18th. Shortly I met with Tim Miller (Texas Equusearch) and Louis Shaefer who is the lead sponsor of the search (along with his project manager, Tim Trahan)—and who had arranged for several expedition firms to participate in the search including J.D. Silvetti (who provided the search boat, the Persistence).  Louis had just flown in for the first time also and immediately suggested not long after dark that we drive out to Fisherman’s Huts—almost certainly where the three suspects took off from the shore with Natalee’s body in a recently stolen cage. (More on specifics of that story below).

(snipped)



The fisherman described the cage as made of 3/8 inch iron (such as used in concrete reinforcing—“rebar”) with a frame size approximately 5 ½ feet by 4 feet by 17 inches.  He described it as a large fishing cage with frame wrapped in chicken wire (hexagonal openings) having an opening in one panel which allowed them to trap fish. He felt like it would take two men to manage cage. It would lay low in the nearby fishing boat. He recalls the iron stain in the grass when the cage had gone missing—this almost directly behind his hut on the south side of huts.


As I write this, the ocean search is now getting to deeper waters where the body most likely is. The boat has demonstrated excellent capability to spot underwater targets. Various anonymous tips have been received about the location of Natalee’s body. One of the most intriguing has been a tip from a reported friend of Deepak who said that Deepak confessed one evening while using drugs together that they had dropped the body 10 miles out into the ocean.

Very interesting indeed.... I would love to know how many of the "tips" match - meaning location wise.  I don't doubt that one of the perps has blabbed to someone.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: ldstlou on January 09, 2008, 04:43:46 PM
I did it again.. F'd up another quote.. I gotta go to bed. I have alot of work ahead of me.. perhaps a NEW job on the horizon..  Gonna be a gramma.. and hit with a divorce ! Merry Chritmas and Happy New Year to Angie !
 I WILL survive this dammit.  I know I have it in me..   :2doh: 

 Good night everyone..  HUGS ans sweet dreams..  :smt052

YOU WILL SURVIVE ANGIE!  We all love you and you will be in my thoughts and prayers.  Take care of yourself.  nite!

Yeah, what she said.  Love you Angie.
What Peaches said.

add me to the what they said's...hang in there Angie and remember we are here for you...big hugs coming your way

more hugs coming your way from me too!! :smt052


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: Magnolia on January 09, 2008, 05:13:59 PM
Hodges writings are interesting in that they debunk so many
things that have been stated as fact by the likes of Dompig
and Renfro.
Interesting also that he seems to indicate that the Gottenbos
kept their boat at the marina near the Holiday Inn and Marriott
regularly.  Possibably the picture we saw of the boat was
when it had been trailered to the home for work or cleaning.
It shows the thoroughness of the search crew in that they
had a replica of the fish trap constructed.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: ldstlou on January 09, 2008, 05:24:09 PM
Hodges writings are interesting in that they debunk so many
things that have been stated as fact by the likes of Dompig
and Renfro.
Interesting also that he seems to indicate that the Gottenbos
kept their boat at the marina near the Holiday Inn and Marriott
regularly.  Possibably the picture we saw of the boat was
when it had been trailered to the home for work or cleaning.
It shows the thoroughness of the search crew in that they
had a replica of the fish trap constructed.

REALLY fascinating stuff!!! Going back to read more. Thanks for the link Klaas!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: Magnolia on January 09, 2008, 05:37:36 PM
Hooray...

Wednesday, January 2, 2008
X. Persistence
 
Update: Wed 09-Jan 1816 hrs
All Internet connectivity was lost for two days due to rough seas and equipment failure. The old adage "No news is good news" only applies on land. Offshore, the 'Law of the Sea' rules and no news usually just means "lost contact". The seas were 6-8ft with the occasional 12+ft swell. The past two nights were spent conducting a bathymetry-only survey of the new grid. The new grid more than doubles the original search area. If completed, the total area thoroughly searched will be 80% the size of Aruba. Currently, the seas are calm relative to what we've been experiencing. The four digits posted on the echo-sounder is a reminder of the limits being put to the test.

Every body of water near land has its own unique character, temperament, and color. The nature of water is governed by the trio of land, sea, and sky. The sea surface reflects the sky, the water column contains the turbidity from the land, and the seabed stares upward through the water column as long as the water allows it to. However, as the seabed falls away into the abyss, the color is always the same dark navy blue. Staring into these deep and dark waters reminds me that this island is surrounded by the same water that flows throughout our entire world. On the surface, the expanse of the sea divides us. Looking deeper, it is really what connects us all. Perhaps the sea gives a reflection of human nature and not just the sky.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: Kermit on January 09, 2008, 05:38:55 PM
For LaLa'smom


#  Shango Says:
June 27th, 2005 at 12:26 pm

Babalu finally opened a window with a view into the house of Babylon with his
12:30 AM posting

Simian your Doppleganger is with us


#  Babalú Says:
June 27th, 2005 at 12:30 am

Concerned

No, I guess he is head of some local official corps. He is the guy that knows everything and that has been in the house of Babylonians NOT seeking pleasure for himself, so Shango says. So maybe he went to search for Natalee and he is the chief of Polis.

_________________________________
TITO: Chief of police is Ronny Bernadina
      Deputy chief of police is Gerold Dompig
      Police Comissioner of district 2, Noord is Jan van der Straaten
_____________________________


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: klaasend on January 09, 2008, 05:47:46 PM
As ldstlou posted earlier, BETH actually Beth and Matt will be on Oprah next Wednesday, 1/16/08!  You can watch the short preview of next weeks shows from Oprah's website:

http://www2.oprah.com:80/index.jhtml
(click on the left hand side, All New Shows coming up next week)

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/Oprah11608.jpg)

Thanks to VMS for finding the link to the preview  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: klaasend on January 09, 2008, 06:02:37 PM
For LaLa'smom


#  Shango Says:
June 27th, 2005 at 12:26 pm

Babalu finally opened a window with a view into the house of Babylon with his
12:30 AM posting

Simian your Doppleganger is with us


#  Babalú Says:
June 27th, 2005 at 12:30 am

Concerned

No, I guess he is head of some local official corps. He is the guy that knows everything and that has been in the house of Babylonians NOT seeking pleasure for himself, so Shango says. So maybe he went to search for Natalee and he is the chief of Polis.

_________________________________
TITO: Chief of police is Ronny Bernadina
      Deputy chief of police is Gerold Dompig
      Police Comissioner of district 2, Noord is Jan van der Straaten
_____________________________

So Ronny Bernadina = Dirtyhand?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: ldstlou on January 09, 2008, 06:05:02 PM
As ldstlou posted earlier, BETH actually Beth and Matt will be on Oprah next Wednesday, 1/16/08!  You can watch the short preview of next weeks shows from Oprah's website:

http://www2.oprah.com:80/index.jhtml
(click on the left hand side, All New Shows coming up next week)

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/Oprah11608.jpg)

Thanks to VMS for finding the link to the preview  :wink:
I am looking forward to it!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: private eye on January 09, 2008, 06:15:34 PM
As ldstlou posted earlier, BETH actually Beth and Matt will be on Oprah next Wednesday, 1/16/08!  You can watch the short preview of next weeks shows from Oprah's website:

http://www2.oprah.com:80/index.jhtml
(click on the left hand side, All New Shows coming up next week)

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/Oprah11608.jpg)

Thanks to VMS for finding the link to the preview  :wink:
I am looking forward to it!!!

The show isn't being taped until next Tuesday, if rumor is correct


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: dennisintn on January 09, 2008, 06:17:44 PM
As ldstlou posted earlier, BETH actually Beth and Matt will be on Oprah next Wednesday, 1/16/08!  You can watch the short preview of next weeks shows from Oprah's website:

http://www2.oprah.com:80/index.jhtml
(click on the left hand side, All New Shows coming up next week)

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/Oprah11608.jpg)

Thanks to VMS for finding the link to the preview  :wink:
I am looking forward to it!!!

The show isn't being taped until next Tuesday, if rumor is correct
that's very good, the fresher the information, the better.  maybe persistence will have something by then.
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: Magnolia on January 09, 2008, 06:23:53 PM
As ldstlou posted earlier, BETH actually Beth and Matt will be on Oprah next Wednesday, 1/16/08!  You can watch the short preview of next weeks shows from Oprah's website:

http://www2.oprah.com:80/index.jhtml
(click on the left hand side, All New Shows coming up next week)

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/Oprah11608.jpg)

Thanks to VMS for finding the link to the preview  :wink:

It is optimistic to me that Oprah would do this show in
light of the Dr. Phil lawsuit still pending.
I am so glad that Matt will be on with Beth.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 09, 2008, 06:47:07 PM
As ldstlou posted earlier, BETH actually Beth and Matt will be on Oprah next Wednesday, 1/16/08!  You can watch the short preview of next weeks shows from Oprah's website:

http://www2.oprah.com:80/index.jhtml
(click on the left hand side, All New Shows coming up next week)

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/Oprah11608.jpg)

Thanks to VMS for finding the link to the preview  :wink:
I am looking forward to it!!!

The show isn't being taped until next Tuesday, if rumor is correct

Tamikosmom is sooo excited!!!
____________

A VOICE THAT WILL NOT BE SILENCED

Beth Twitty
'Scarborough Country'
October 24, 2005


HOLLOWAY-TWITTY:  I met with Prime Minister Oduber. I don‘t care who you put the pressure on, where it comes from, but I want—you need to figure it out. You need to figure out who needs to apply the pressure and where it needs to be applied, because you have to solve this crime. I said, you do not want to turn me loose from this island without an answer.”


Beth Twitty
'Scarborough Country'
October 24, 2005


“I have told Prime Minister Oduber that I will do this, I will be the voice of Natalee for the next 40 years. And I hope I have that long, because I will do it as long as I can.”


Beth Twitty'
Rita Cosby Live & Direct'
September 14, 2005


“We will keep going back to Aruba over and over again. This is far from over. They know—they have the answers there on the island.”


Beth Twitty
Scarborough Country


TWITTY:  I think it’s just the side that, you know, I—I will stop at nothing to get answers. There is nothing that I won’t do. There’s nowhere that I won’t go, and there’s nothing—I’m going to ask every question. I don’t care how painful it is. I will do it, because I’m not going to have any regrets.”


Beth Twitty
Associated Press
September 6, 2005


For the rest of my life, I will continue to be the voice for my daughter, seeking justice in Aruba. Every parent would want the same justice for their child.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: WhiskeyGirl on January 09, 2008, 06:50:25 PM
I think this is humor...I'll post a snippet...

Quote
Houston, Texas (APE) - Lawyers for convicted Enron felon Jeffrey Skilling admitted today that rather than pursue a long drawn out appeal, he was considering death as an option to avoid further prosecution and civil charges over his role in the collapse of Enron. They stated that Skilling had taken into consideration the best interests of himself and his family after witnessing the dismissal of charges today against fellow convicted conspirator and former boss Kenneth Lay following his untimely death on vacation in Colorado.

Local authorities were not put on a suicide watch as lawyers assured them that Skilling was simply considering an offshore death declaration for tax and legal purposes.

Federal authorities stated that there was little they could do, should Skilling's legal team pursue having him declared legally dead via a coroner's mailbox drop in Aruba.
http://www.unconfirmedsources.com/index.php?itemid=1988



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: AZLady on January 09, 2008, 06:59:27 PM
Huh?  ...Skilling's legal team pursue having him declared legally dead via a coroner's mailbox drop in Aruba.  Now, that is funny!  Someone has a really black sense of humor.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: WhiskeyGirl on January 09, 2008, 07:02:10 PM
Diario has a new look, and a new cartoon today...

(http://news.diario-aruba.com//images/stories/2008N/januari/9/car.jpg)

Not sure what it means.  I'd be afraid if I were that guy on the other side of the desk.   :shock:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 09, 2008, 07:04:49 PM
For LaLa'smom


#  Shango Says:
June 27th, 2005 at 12:26 pm

Babalu finally opened a window with a view into the house of Babylon with his
12:30 AM posting

Simian your Doppleganger is with us


#  Babalú Says:
June 27th, 2005 at 12:30 am

Concerned

No, I guess he is head of some local official corps. He is the guy that knows everything and that has been in the house of Babylonians NOT seeking pleasure for himself, so Shango says. So maybe he went to search for Natalee and he is the chief of Polis.

_________________________________
TITO: Chief of police is Ronny Bernadina
      Deputy chief of police is Gerold Dompig
      Police Comissioner of district 2, Noord is Jan van der Straaten
_____________________________

Thank you froggy. :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 09, 2008, 07:06:56 PM
Hooray...

Wednesday, January 2, 2008
X. Persistence
 
Update: Wed 09-Jan 1816 hrs
All Internet connectivity was lost for two days due to rough seas and equipment failure. The old adage "No news is good news" only applies on land. Offshore, the 'Law of the Sea' rules and no news usually just means "lost contact". The seas were 6-8ft with the occasional 12+ft swell. The past two nights were spent conducting a bathymetry-only survey of the new grid. The new grid more than doubles the original search area. If completed, the total area thoroughly searched will be 80% the size of Aruba. Currently, the seas are calm relative to what we've been experiencing. The four digits posted on the echo-sounder is a reminder of the limits being put to the test.

Every body of water near land has its own unique character, temperament, and color. The nature of water is governed by the trio of land, sea, and sky. The sea surface reflects the sky, the water column contains the turbidity from the land, and the seabed stares upward through the water column as long as the water allows it to. However, as the seabed falls away into the abyss, the color is always the same dark navy blue. Staring into these deep and dark waters reminds me that this island is surrounded by the same water that flows throughout our entire world. On the surface, the expanse of the sea divides us. Looking deeper, it is really what connects us all. Perhaps the sea gives a reflection of human nature and not just the sky.



What were the water conditions the morning/day of May 30, 2005?

Obviously ... it would have been very risky for the small boat owned by Koen's father to have ventured out if water conditions mirrored what the Persistence has been experiencing throughout this search.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: ldstlou on January 09, 2008, 07:13:54 PM
Hooray...

Wednesday, January 2, 2008
X. Persistence
 
Update: Wed 09-Jan 1816 hrs
All Internet connectivity was lost for two days due to rough seas and equipment failure. The old adage "No news is good news" only applies on land. Offshore, the 'Law of the Sea' rules and no news usually just means "lost contact". The seas were 6-8ft with the occasional 12+ft swell. The past two nights were spent conducting a bathymetry-only survey of the new grid. The new grid more than doubles the original search area. If completed, the total area thoroughly searched will be 80% the size of Aruba. Currently, the seas are calm relative to what we've been experiencing. The four digits posted on the echo-sounder is a reminder of the limits being put to the test.

Every body of water near land has its own unique character, temperament, and color. The nature of water is governed by the trio of land, sea, and sky. The sea surface reflects the sky, the water column contains the turbidity from the land, and the seabed stares upward through the water column as long as the water allows it to. However, as the seabed falls away into the abyss, the color is always the same dark navy blue. Staring into these deep and dark waters reminds me that this island is surrounded by the same water that flows throughout our entire world. On the surface, the expanse of the sea divides us. Looking deeper, it is really what connects us all. Perhaps the sea gives a reflection of human nature and not just the sky.



What were the water conditions the morning/day of May 30, 2005?

Obviously ... it would have been very risky for the small boat owned by Koen's father to have ventured out if water conditions mirrored what the Persistence has been experiencing throughout this search.

Janet
I just read somewhere that the waters were calm...hmmm...maybe Hodges website? I think the waters are turbulant because of the season.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: ldstlou on January 09, 2008, 07:15:11 PM
I thought it was fascinating what Hodges had to say about meeting the fisherman and the evidence of the break-in. Thanks for the link Klaas.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: ldstlou on January 09, 2008, 07:18:29 PM
I have a question if anyone knows the answer; is Oprah broadcast in Aruba?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 09, 2008, 07:28:06 PM
 :smt102


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: greeneyedlady on January 09, 2008, 07:28:59 PM
I have a question if anyone knows the answer; is Oprah broadcast in Aruba?

ld, if Oprah was doing a show in Aruba, wouldn't you think they may have something to be there for?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: Pita on January 09, 2008, 07:29:04 PM
Hooray...

Wednesday, January 2, 2008
X. Persistence
 
Update: Wed 09-Jan 1816 hrs
All Internet connectivity was lost for two days due to rough seas and equipment failure. The old adage "No news is good news" only applies on land. Offshore, the 'Law of the Sea' rules and no news usually just means "lost contact". The seas were 6-8ft with the occasional 12+ft swell. The past two nights were spent conducting a bathymetry-only survey of the new grid. The new grid more than doubles the original search area. If completed, the total area thoroughly searched will be 80% the size of Aruba. Currently, the seas are calm relative to what we've been experiencing. The four digits posted on the echo-sounder is a reminder of the limits being put to the test.

Every body of water near land has its own unique character, temperament, and color. The nature of water is governed by the trio of land, sea, and sky. The sea surface reflects the sky, the water column contains the turbidity from the land, and the seabed stares upward through the water column as long as the water allows it to. However, as the seabed falls away into the abyss, the color is always the same dark navy blue. Staring into these deep and dark waters reminds me that this island is surrounded by the same water that flows throughout our entire world. On the surface, the expanse of the sea divides us. Looking deeper, it is really what connects us all. Perhaps the sea gives a reflection of human nature and not just the sky.



What were the water conditions the morning/day of May 30, 2005?

Obviously ... it would have been very risky for the small boat owned by Koen's father to have ventured out if water conditions mirrored what the Persistence has been experiencing throughout this search.

Janet

May 30, 2005   Wind Conditions in Aruba

Wind Speed           11 mph / 22 km/h ()     
Max Wind Speed    26 mph / 43 km/h     
Max Gust Speed     37 mph / 59 km/h     
Visibility                7.4 miles / 12.0 kilometers 

http://www.wunderground.com/history/airport/TNCA/2005/5/30/DailyHistory.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 09, 2008, 07:29:30 PM
One of the most intriguing has been a tip from a reported friend of Deepak who said that Deepak confessed one evening while using drugs together that they had dropped the body 10 miles out into the ocean.

Ten miles out the depth is 3000 meters. I don't think persistence is looking that far out. The water is over 9000 feet deep and the surface and underwater currents run to Panama.

10 miles?  How long would that take in the Gottenbos boat?  How long would it take in a different kind of boat?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: Observer on January 09, 2008, 07:31:38 PM
One of the most intriguing has been a tip from a reported friend of Deepak who said that Deepak confessed one evening while using drugs together that they had dropped the body 10 miles out into the ocean.

Ten miles out the depth is 3000 meters. I don't think persistence is looking that far out. The water is over 9000 feet deep and the surface and underwater currents run to Panama.

10 miles?  How long would that take in the Gottenbos boat?  How long would it take in a different kind of boat?

Somewhere around 30 minutes...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: klaasend on January 09, 2008, 07:32:24 PM
One of the most intriguing has been a tip from a reported friend of Deepak who said that Deepak confessed one evening while using drugs together that they had dropped the body 10 miles out into the ocean.

Ten miles out the depth is 3000 meters. I don't think persistence is looking that far out. The water is over 9000 feet deep and the surface and underwater currents run to Panama.

10 miles?  How long would that take in the Gottenbos boat?  How long would it take in a different kind of boat?

20-30 minutes I'd guess


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: Hotshot on January 09, 2008, 07:33:13 PM
For LaLa'smom


#  Shango Says:
June 27th, 2005 at 12:26 pm

Babalu finally opened a window with a view into the house of Babylon with his
12:30 AM posting

Simian your Doppleganger is with us


#  Babalú Says:
June 27th, 2005 at 12:30 am

Concerned

No, I guess he is head of some local official corps. He is the guy that knows everything and that has been in the house of Babylonians NOT seeking pleasure for himself, so Shango says. So maybe he went to search for Natalee and he is the chief of Polis.

_________________________________
TITO: Chief of police is Ronny Bernadina
      Deputy chief of police is Gerold Dompig
      Police Comissioner of district 2, Noord is Jan van der Straaten
_____________________________

So Ronny Bernadina = Dirtyhand?

Well this was a long wall that had grafitti on it about natalee, and I did miss one part of the wall here.  And that one stated "F*** Bernadino"  So I am guessing you are right, it sure fits.  Dont forget, this was taken on the "gang" side of town in Dakota/Madiki.
(http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h294/gummy_2006/graffitticollage.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 09, 2008, 07:37:19 PM
The fisherman described the cage as made of 3/8 inch iron (such as used in concrete reinforcing—“rebar”) with a frame size approximately 5 ½ feet by 4 feet by 17 inches.   He described it as a large fishing cage with frame wrapped in chicken wire (hexagonal openings) having an opening in one panel which allowed them to trap fish. He felt like it would take two men to manage cage. It would lay low in the nearby fishing boat. He recalls the iron stain in the grass when the cage had gone missing—this almost directly behind his hut on the south side of huts.

Concrete reinforcing --'rebar' is heavy, imo....I'm thinking this cage with the additional chicken wire was definitely heavy enough to require 2 men to move as Hodges explains.  Just thinking aloud, here....

What's the difference between nautical miles and miles as we know them on land???? 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: klaasend on January 09, 2008, 07:39:31 PM
I have a question if anyone knows the answer; is Oprah broadcast in Aruba?

ld, if Oprah was doing a show in Aruba, wouldn't you think they may have something to be there for?

GEL - I think ldstlou was wondering if they can watch Oprah in Aruba.  I don't think the show is being taped in Aruba (or maybe I misunderstood your post)  :wink:

My guess is yes, they can get Oprah in Aruba.  What they don't get is the cable shows I think. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: ldstlou on January 09, 2008, 07:39:50 PM
I have a question if anyone knows the answer; is Oprah broadcast in Aruba?

ld, if Oprah was doing a show in Aruba, wouldn't you think they may have something to be there for?

no no...I mean do they show Oprah on aruba..does that make sense..do they get her show there.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: ldstlou on January 09, 2008, 07:40:50 PM
I have a question if anyone knows the answer; is Oprah broadcast in Aruba?

ld, if Oprah was doing a show in Aruba, wouldn't you think they may have something to be there for?

GEL - I think ldstlou was wondering if they can watch Oprah in Aruba.  I don't think the show is being taped in Aruba (or maybe I misunderstood your post)  :wink:

My guess is yes, they can get Oprah in Aruba.  What they don't get is the cable shows I think. 

Klaas is starting to understand me..lol...pretty scarey huh Klaas...you may have been doing this too long now!! lol


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: MuffyBee on January 09, 2008, 07:42:41 PM
Is that blood on her feet? How did she die again? Drowning? Body put in a dirty pick up truck?  :shock:



I don't know this one.  That sure looks like blood on her feet.
Hmmm..It appears the toes could have cuts on them. I guess its possible she stepped on coral when she drowned. When they pulled her out it dried on her feet? Is that possible?

I hope I don't offend here, but you know, there are creatures in the water...  There may have been small wounds from the coral and fishes picked at it...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: greeneyedlady on January 09, 2008, 07:46:45 PM
I have a question if anyone knows the answer; is Oprah broadcast in Aruba?

ld, if Oprah was doing a show in Aruba, wouldn't you think they may have something to be there for?

GEL - I think ldstlou was wondering if they can watch Oprah in Aruba.  I don't think the show is being taped in Aruba (or maybe I misunderstood your post)  :wink:

My guess is yes, they can get Oprah in Aruba.  What they don't get is the cable shows I think. 

Klaas is starting to understand me..lol...pretty scarey huh Klaas...you may have been doing this too long now!! lol

Thanks Klaas, I did misunderstand ld's post...just a little wishful thnking on my part. :D :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: NM on January 09, 2008, 07:46:56 PM
Thank you IDStLou, Klaas, and VMS for the info of Beth on Oprah.

For the Monkeys, especially Angie. Enjoy
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZLtR8_qw_yM


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: ldstlou on January 09, 2008, 07:46:56 PM
Is that blood on her feet? How did she die again? Drowning? Body put in a dirty pick up truck?  :shock:



I don't know this one.  That sure looks like blood on her feet.
Hmmm..It appears the toes could have cuts on them. I guess its possible she stepped on coral when she drowned. When they pulled her out it dried on her feet? Is that possible?

I hope I don't offend here, but you know, there are creatures in the water...  There may have been small wounds from the coral and fishes picked at it...
I think it said he was slammed continuously against the rocks, may have caused the abrasions.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 09, 2008, 07:47:32 PM
The fisherman described the cage as made of 3/8 inch iron (such as used in concrete reinforcing—“rebar”) with a frame size approximately 5 ½ feet by 4 feet by 17 inches.   He described it as a large fishing cage with frame wrapped in chicken wire (hexagonal openings) having an opening in one panel which allowed them to trap fish. He felt like it would take two men to manage cage. It would lay low in the nearby fishing boat. He recalls the iron stain in the grass when the cage had gone missing—this almost directly behind his hut on the south side of huts.

Concrete reinforcing --'rebar' is heavy, imo....I'm thinking this cage with the additional chicken wire was definitely heavy enough to require 2 men to move as Hodges explains.  Just thinking aloud, here....

What's the difference between nautical miles and miles as we know them on land???? 

I searched for the answer to my question:

A nautical mile is 1,852 meters, or 1.852 kilometers. In the English measurement system, a nautical mile is 1.1508 miles, or 6,076 feet.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: ldstlou on January 09, 2008, 07:48:45 PM
Thank you IDStLou, Klaas, and VMS for the info of Beth on Oprah.

For the Monkeys, especially Angie. Enjoy
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZLtR8_qw_yM

too cute!!! I loved that!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: ldstlou on January 09, 2008, 07:50:06 PM
The fisherman described the cage as made of 3/8 inch iron (such as used in concrete reinforcing—“rebar”) with a frame size approximately 5 ½ feet by 4 feet by 17 inches.   He described it as a large fishing cage with frame wrapped in chicken wire (hexagonal openings) having an opening in one panel which allowed them to trap fish. He felt like it would take two men to manage cage. It would lay low in the nearby fishing boat. He recalls the iron stain in the grass when the cage had gone missing—this almost directly behind his hut on the south side of huts.

Concrete reinforcing --'rebar' is heavy, imo....I'm thinking this cage with the additional chicken wire was definitely heavy enough to require 2 men to move as Hodges explains.  Just thinking aloud, here....

What's the difference between nautical miles and miles as we know them on land???? 

I searched for the answer to my question:

A nautical mile is 1,852 meters, or 1.852 kilometers. In the English measurement system, a nautical mile is 1.1508 miles, or 6,076 feet.

are you talking to yourself again? lol...just kidding!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: Elaine on January 09, 2008, 07:52:30 PM
Thank you IDStLou, Klaas, and VMS for the info of Beth on Oprah.

For the Monkeys, especially Angie. Enjoy
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZLtR8_qw_yM
Hiya NM~!! I am excited too that Beth and Matt will be on the Oprah show!

O/T  It looks like CBB has to make you a new avatar, as you can see she did a great job on mine  :D


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: ldstlou on January 09, 2008, 07:52:45 PM
I have a question if anyone knows the answer; is Oprah broadcast in Aruba?

ld, if Oprah was doing a show in Aruba, wouldn't you think they may have something to be there for?

GEL - I think ldstlou was wondering if they can watch Oprah in Aruba.  I don't think the show is being taped in Aruba (or maybe I misunderstood your post)  :wink:

My guess is yes, they can get Oprah in Aruba.  What they don't get is the cable shows I think. 

Klaas is starting to understand me..lol...pretty scarey huh Klaas...you may have been doing this too long now!! lol

Thanks Klaas, I did misunderstand ld's post...just a little wishful thnking on my part. :D :wink:

We had hoped that Oprah would get involved for so long, I am glad she is finally doing a show on Natalee. It will reach a very large audience and imo, have some serious ramifications...where's the beef?! lol Can't help Aruba's image nor it's spring tourism numbers!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: Observer on January 09, 2008, 07:54:42 PM
Television entertainment comes in all kinds of flavors. Situational Comedies (Sitcoms), News, Reality shows, Game shows, Documentaries,  Extreme Sports or Movies.

Cable TV Aruba offers the leading broadcast stations from the U.S.A. such as ABC, CBS,
and NBC,  as well as leading stations from Latin Amercia. In addition we carry all the
well known Cable networks such as CNN, ESPN, USA, FOX and Nickelodeon.

Cable TV Aruba also offers several movie packages for your at home
entertainment. HBO, Cinemax, Movie City and Cinecanal offer an
extensive choice of movies.

http://www.cta.aw/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=82&Itemid=67


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: ldstlou on January 09, 2008, 07:56:22 PM
I have a question if anyone knows the answer; is Oprah broadcast in Aruba?

ld, if Oprah was doing a show in Aruba, wouldn't you think they may have something to be there for?

GEL - I think ldstlou was wondering if they can watch Oprah in Aruba.  I don't think the show is being taped in Aruba (or maybe I misunderstood your post)  :wink:

My guess is yes, they can get Oprah in Aruba.  What they don't get is the cable shows I think. 

Klaas is starting to understand me..lol...pretty scarey huh Klaas...you may have been doing this too long now!! lol

Thanks Klaas, I did misunderstand ld's post...just a little wishful thnking on my part. :D :wink:

We had hoped that Oprah would get involved for so long, I am glad she is finally doing a show on Natalee. It will reach a very large audience and imo, have some serious ramifications...where's the beef?! lol Can't help Aruba's image nor it's spring tourism numbers!!!

BETH STRIKES BACK!!!
And good for her after they latest Aruba pulled on her!!!!
Let's see how the refugees start bashing Oprah and trying to play this one down!!! Like her or not, Oprah has one hell of an audience!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: ldstlou on January 09, 2008, 07:57:37 PM
Television entertainment comes in all kinds of flavors. Situational Comedies (Sitcoms), News, Reality shows, Game shows, Documentaries,  Extreme Sports or Movies.

Cable TV Aruba offers the leading broadcast stations from the U.S.A. such as ABC, CBS,
and NBC,  as well as leading stations from Latin Amercia. In addition we carry all the
well known Cable networks such as CNN, ESPN, USA, FOX and Nickelodeon.

Cable TV Aruba also offers several movie packages for your at home
entertainment. HBO, Cinemax, Movie City and Cinecanal offer an
extensive choice of movies.

http://www.cta.aw/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=82&Itemid=67

Cool!!! Tell them the REAL Truth Beth!!! Go get 'em girl!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: Observer on January 09, 2008, 07:58:00 PM
Is that blood on her feet? How did she die again? Drowning? Body put in a dirty pick up truck?  :shock:



I don't know this one.  That sure looks like blood on her feet.
Hmmm..It appears the toes could have cuts on them. I guess its possible she stepped on coral when she drowned. When they pulled her out it dried on her feet? Is that possible?

I hope I don't offend here, but you know, there are creatures in the water...  There may have been small wounds from the coral and fishes picked at it...

From what I saw it looked like a drowning and the cuts could have been coral. Just weird how it dried on the left foot,almost as though he walked on the blood and it dried on his heel.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: Elaine on January 09, 2008, 08:01:20 PM


We had hoped that Oprah would get involved for so long, I am glad she is finally doing a show on Natalee. It will reach a very large audience and imo, have some serious ramifications...where's the beef?! lol Can't help Aruba's image nor it's spring tourism numbers!!!
I agree with you ldstlou. The Oprah show goes into millions of homes. This is great news!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: ldstlou on January 09, 2008, 08:02:24 PM


We had hoped that Oprah would get involved for so long, I am glad she is finally doing a show on Natalee. It will reach a very large audience and imo, have some serious ramifications...where's the beef?! lol Can't help Aruba's image nor it's spring tourism numbers!!!
I agree with you ldstlou. The Oprah show goes into millions of homes. This is great news!

I have been grinning ear to ear all day!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: NM on January 09, 2008, 08:09:36 PM
Elaine!!!!  It is so good to "see" you! And you look extra wonderful in your CBB Vtine's outfit.  I'm so behind, or such a behind :o, I'm still catching up from insane work and the holidays.

I hope Oprah does justice for Nat and Beth.

2NJ,From what I heard you are not crazy if you talk to yourself, only when you answer yourself. :D


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: Kermit on January 09, 2008, 08:13:36 PM
For LaLa'smom


#  Shango Says:
June 27th, 2005 at 12:26 pm

Babalu finally opened a window with a view into the house of Babylon with his
12:30 AM posting

Simian your Doppleganger is with us


#  Babalú Says:
June 27th, 2005 at 12:30 am

Concerned

No, I guess he is head of some local official corps. He is the guy that knows everything and that has been in the house of Babylonians NOT seeking pleasure for himself, so Shango says. So maybe he went to search for Natalee and he is the chief of Polis.

_________________________________
TITO: Chief of police is Ronny Bernadina
      Deputy chief of police is Gerold Dompig
      Police Comissioner of district 2, Noord is Jan van der Straaten
_____________________________

Thank you froggy. :wink:

You are most welcome.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03
Post by: NM on January 09, 2008, 08:14:15 PM
Is that blood on her feet? How did she die again? Drowning? Body put in a dirty pick up truck?  :shock:



I don't know this one.  That sure looks like blood on her feet.
Hmmm..It appears the toes could have cuts on them. I guess its possible she stepped on coral when she drowned. When they pulled her out it dried on her feet? Is that possible?

I hope I don't offend here, but you know, there are creatures in the water...  There may have been small wounds from the coral and fishes picked at it...

From what I saw it looked like a drowning and the cuts could have been coral. Just weird how it dried on the left foot,almost as though he walked on the blood and it dried on his heel.
Typical "death" in aruba. STRANGE. Like the "suicides" where the persons' knees were bent b/c they were to close to the ground, and their hands in their pockets!?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: AZSunny on January 09, 2008, 08:17:31 PM
I have a question if anyone knows the answer; is Oprah broadcast in Aruba?

ld, if Oprah was doing a show in Aruba, wouldn't you think they may have something to be there for?

GEL - I think ldstlou was wondering if they can watch Oprah in Aruba.  I don't think the show is being taped in Aruba (or maybe I misunderstood your post)  :wink:

My guess is yes, they can get Oprah in Aruba.  What they don't get is the cable shows I think. 

Klaas is starting to understand me..lol...pretty scarey huh Klaas...you may have been doing this too long now!! lol

Thanks Klaas, I did misunderstand ld's post...just a little wishful thnking on my part. :D :wink:

We had hoped that Oprah would get involved for so long, I am glad she is finally doing a show on Natalee. It will reach a very large audience and imo, have some serious ramifications...where's the beef?! lol Can't help Aruba's image nor it's spring tourism numbers!!!

But remember, Ophra has a home on Aruba!  I think she is supportive of Beth and Dave though.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: ldstlou on January 09, 2008, 08:19:07 PM
I have a question if anyone knows the answer; is Oprah broadcast in Aruba?

ld, if Oprah was doing a show in Aruba, wouldn't you think they may have something to be there for?

GEL - I think ldstlou was wondering if they can watch Oprah in Aruba.  I don't think the show is being taped in Aruba (or maybe I misunderstood your post)  :wink:

My guess is yes, they can get Oprah in Aruba.  What they don't get is the cable shows I think. 

Klaas is starting to understand me..lol...pretty scarey huh Klaas...you may have been doing this too long now!! lol

Thanks Klaas, I did misunderstand ld's post...just a little wishful thnking on my part. :D :wink:

We had hoped that Oprah would get involved for so long, I am glad she is finally doing a show on Natalee. It will reach a very large audience and imo, have some serious ramifications...where's the beef?! lol Can't help Aruba's image nor it's spring tourism numbers!!!

But remember, Ophra has a home on Aruba!  I think she is supportive of Beth and Dave though.

hmmmm I had no idea she had a home there.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: Kermit on January 09, 2008, 08:21:43 PM
I have a question if anyone knows the answer; is Oprah broadcast in Aruba?

ld, if Oprah was doing a show in Aruba, wouldn't you think they may have something to be there for?

GEL - I think ldstlou was wondering if they can watch Oprah in Aruba.  I don't think the show is being taped in Aruba (or maybe I misunderstood your post)  :wink:

My guess is yes, they can get Oprah in Aruba.  What they don't get is the cable shows I think. 

Klaas is starting to understand me..lol...pretty scarey huh Klaas...you may have been doing this too long now!! lol

Thanks Klaas, I did misunderstand ld's post...just a little wishful thnking on my part. :D :wink:

We had hoped that Oprah would get involved for so long, I am glad she is finally doing a show on Natalee. It will reach a very large audience and imo, have some serious ramifications...where's the beef?! lol Can't help Aruba's image nor it's spring tourism numbers!!!

But remember, Ophra has a home on Aruba!  I think she is supportive of Beth and Dave though.

I know Oprah has a home in Hawaii, but I'm not sure if she has one in Aruba too.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 09, 2008, 08:27:21 PM
Hooray...

Wednesday, January 2, 2008
X. Persistence
 
Update: Wed 09-Jan 1816 hrs
All Internet connectivity was lost for two days due to rough seas and equipment failure. The old adage "No news is good news" only applies on land. Offshore, the 'Law of the Sea' rules and no news usually just means "lost contact". The seas were 6-8ft with the occasional 12+ft swell. The past two nights were spent conducting a bathymetry-only survey of the new grid. The new grid more than doubles the original search area. If completed, the total area thoroughly searched will be 80% the size of Aruba. Currently, the seas are calm relative to what we've been experiencing. The four digits posted on the echo-sounder is a reminder of the limits being put to the test.

Every body of water near land has its own unique character, temperament, and color. The nature of water is governed by the trio of land, sea, and sky. The sea surface reflects the sky, the water column contains the turbidity from the land, and the seabed stares upward through the water column as long as the water allows it to. However, as the seabed falls away into the abyss, the color is always the same dark navy blue. Staring into these deep and dark waters reminds me that this island is surrounded by the same water that flows throughout our entire world. On the surface, the expanse of the sea divides us. Looking deeper, it is really what connects us all. Perhaps the sea gives a reflection of human nature and not just the sky.



What were the water conditions the morning/day of May 30, 2005?

Obviously ... it would have been very risky for the small boat owned by Koen's father to have ventured out if water conditions mirrored what the Persistence has been experiencing throughout this search.

Janet

May 30, 2005   Wind Conditions in Aruba

Wind Speed           11 mph / 22 km/h ()     
Max Wind Speed    26 mph / 43 km/h     
Max Gust Speed     37 mph / 59 km/h     
Visibility                7.4 miles / 12.0 kilometers 

http://www.wunderground.com/history/airport/TNCA/2005/5/30/DailyHistory.html


Thank you Pita.

According to my hubby ... who has fished and cruised ... the Georgia Strait and Gulf Island as well as the West Coast of Vancouver Island (British Columbia) all his life ... the above conditions wind conditions that Pita posted constitues a small craft warning.  Small craft is considered vessels up to 20 feet.

Janet.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: private eye on January 09, 2008, 08:28:40 PM
One of the most intriguing has been a tip from a reported friend of Deepak who said that Deepak confessed one evening while using drugs together that they had dropped the body 10 miles out into the ocean.

Ten miles out the depth is 3000 meters. I don't think persistence is looking that far out. The water is over 9000 feet deep and the surface and underwater currents run to Panama.

10 miles?  How long would that take in the Gottenbos boat?  How long would it take in a different kind of boat?

Somewhere around 30 minutes...

a slow speed realistic speed would be between 20-30 mph


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: Peaches on January 09, 2008, 08:30:08 PM
Thank you IDStLou, Klaas, and VMS for the info of Beth on Oprah.

For the Monkeys, especially Angie. Enjoy
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZLtR8_qw_yM

LMAO!  That is perfect.  I have to show the whole fandamily now....

Thank you, NM.

It's almost as good as the penguin smacking JVDS in the water....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: hotping on January 09, 2008, 08:33:28 PM
Hooray...

Wednesday, January 2, 2008
X. Persistence
 
Update: Wed 09-Jan 1816 hrs
All Internet connectivity was lost for two days due to rough seas and equipment failure. The old adage "No news is good news" only applies on land. Offshore, the 'Law of the Sea' rules and no news usually just means "lost contact". The seas were 6-8ft with the occasional 12+ft swell. The past two nights were spent conducting a bathymetry-only survey of the new grid. The new grid more than doubles the original search area. If completed, the total area thoroughly searched will be 80% the size of Aruba. Currently, the seas are calm relative to what we've been experiencing. The four digits posted on the echo-sounder is a reminder of the limits being put to the test.

Every body of water near land has its own unique character, temperament, and color. The nature of water is governed by the trio of land, sea, and sky. The sea surface reflects the sky, the water column contains the turbidity from the land, and the seabed stares upward through the water column as long as the water allows it to. However, as the seabed falls away into the abyss, the color is always the same dark navy blue. Staring into these deep and dark waters reminds me that this island is surrounded by the same water that flows throughout our entire world. On the surface, the expanse of the sea divides us. Looking deeper, it is really what connects us all. Perhaps the sea gives a reflection of human nature and not just the sky.



What were the water conditions the morning/day of May 30, 2005?

Obviously ... it would have been very risky for the small boat owned by Koen's father to have ventured out if water conditions mirrored what the Persistence has been experiencing throughout this search.

Janet

May 30, 2005   Wind Conditions in Aruba

Wind Speed           11 mph / 22 km/h ()     
Max Wind Speed    26 mph / 43 km/h     
Max Gust Speed     37 mph / 59 km/h     
Visibility                7.4 miles / 12.0 kilometers 

http://www.wunderground.com/history/airport/TNCA/2005/5/30/DailyHistory.html


Thank you Pita.

According to my hubby ... who has fished and cruised ... the Georgia Strait and Gulf Island as well as the West Coast of Vancouver Island (British Columbia) all his life ... the above conditions wind conditions that Pita posted constitues a small craft warning.  Small craft is considered vessels up to 20 feet.

Janet.
The perps don't seem to be bothered by any kind of warnings plus They were probably so high on their drugs that They never thought about the rough seas. JMHO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: San on January 09, 2008, 08:33:44 PM
Let's get to 50  :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: Magnolia on January 09, 2008, 08:33:48 PM
[

But remember, Ophra has a home on Aruba!  I think she is supportive of Beth and Dave though.
[/quote]

I know Oprah has a home in Hawaii, but I'm not sure if she has one in Aruba too.


[/quote]

From Oprah's Bio:

Homes
Winfrey currently lives on “The Promised Land”, her 42 acre (170,000 m²) ocean and mountain view estate in Montecito, California, outside of Santa Barbara. Winfrey also owns a house in Lavallette, New Jersey, an apartment in Chicago, an estate on Fisher Island off the coast of Miami, a ski house in Telluride, Colorado, and a home on the island of Maui, Hawaii. Winfrey's show is based in Chicago, so she spends time there, specifically in the neighborhood of Streeterville, but otherwise resides in California. Her Hawaii property was featured on the cover of O at Home and on her TV show.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: NM on January 09, 2008, 08:35:06 PM
Thank you IDStLou, Klaas, and VMS for the info of Beth on Oprah.

For the Monkeys, especially Angie. Enjoy
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZLtR8_qw_yM

LMAO!  That is perfect.  I have to show the whole fandamily now....

Thank you, NM.

It's almost as good as the penguin smacking JVDS in the water....
PEACHES! I'm so glad you watched it.
It is a scream. I watched it like 3 x in a row.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #710 1/03 - 1/09/2007
Post by: San on January 09, 2008, 08:36:44 PM
(http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d118/Sanddrops/Scared%20Monkeys/LOCKED.gif)

Please move to Natalee Case Discussion #711

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2512.0