Scared Monkeys Discussion Forum

Natalee Holloway => LCD Archive => Topic started by: klaasend on January 09, 2008, 02:29:27 AM



Title: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 - 1/12/08
Post by: klaasend on January 09, 2008, 02:29:27 AM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/NH2008.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Observer on January 09, 2008, 08:36:33 PM
Posted at RU  :roll: How many of these hangings had one hand in their pocket?

(http://img168.imageshack.us/img168/558/arubamurder2005jz1.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)
(http://img145.imageshack.us/img145/2038/suicidearuba2005ue1.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 09, 2008, 08:39:23 PM
Made it!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: NM on January 09, 2008, 08:47:21 PM
Interesting that Drowning is a "suicide".


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 09, 2008, 08:48:51 PM
Posted at RU  :roll: How many of these hangings had one hand in their pocket?

(http://img168.imageshack.us/img168/558/arubamurder2005jz1.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)
(http://img145.imageshack.us/img145/2038/suicidearuba2005ue1.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)


I wonder who the murder victim was on May 31, 2005?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 09, 2008, 09:00:13 PM
Posted at RU  :roll: How many of these hangings had one hand in their pocket?

(http://img168.imageshack.us/img168/558/arubamurder2005jz1.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)
(http://img145.imageshack.us/img145/2038/suicidearuba2005ue1.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)


I wonder who the murder victim was on May 31, 2005?

thats a good question...going to look at our murder and crime thread


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 09, 2008, 09:06:24 PM
Posted at RU  :roll: How many of these hangings had one hand in their pocket?

(http://img168.imageshack.us/img168/558/arubamurder2005jz1.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)
(http://img145.imageshack.us/img145/2038/suicidearuba2005ue1.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)


I wonder who the murder victim was on May 31, 2005?

05/31/2005 – Rastaman “C.E.M.” fatally stabbed another man (victim Juni Tromp) on the beach.
Diario
Posted 8/19/2006 at M&C by Sharon; credit to dkpen & BLEACHEDBLACK. Also by Appeals 8/29


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: AZSunny on January 09, 2008, 09:07:35 PM
Regarding Ophra with a home on Aruba, it was widely discussed here several years ago.  Perhaps I accepted the info in good faith.  Who knows, sorry wasn't trying to deliver misinformation. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 09, 2008, 09:08:21 PM
From the Murder and Crime thread (I have a photo of him somewhere)

05/31/2005 – Rastaman “C.E.M.” fatally stabbed another man (victim Juni Tromp) on the beach.
 
Diario
Posted 8/19/2006 at M&C by Sharon; credit to dkpen & BLEACHEDBLACK. Also by Appeals 8/29


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 09, 2008, 09:10:42 PM
Regarding Ophra with a home on Aruba, it was widely discussed here several years ago.  Perhaps I accepted the info in good faith.  Who knows, sorry wasn't trying to deliver misinformation. 

Back then we were told so many things by people we "thought" were reliable.  We know better now.  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: San on January 09, 2008, 09:14:56 PM
When you think about it why the hell would Oprah want to buy a home on that crapola island when there are so many beautiful places in this world.  They could only wish she did have a house on that hell hole.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: mishy on January 09, 2008, 09:16:11 PM
So true, Klaas. We have certainly learned a lot!

Do we know when Beth and Matt are going to be on Oprah?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: NM on January 09, 2008, 09:18:49 PM
Regarding Ophra with a home on Aruba, it was widely discussed here several years ago.  Perhaps I accepted the info in good faith.  Who knows, sorry wasn't trying to deliver misinformation. 

Back then we were told so many things by people we "thought" were reliable.  We know better now.  :wink:
Amen! We know their system NOW, or should I say dis-system.

IdStLou, great find.  I was looking for and then at the www.mementomori.net site


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 09, 2008, 09:20:05 PM
O/T

Breaking News >> 6.4 Magnitude Earthquake Strikes Off Oregon Coast, USGS Reports
 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 09, 2008, 09:20:52 PM
So true, Klaas. We have certainly learned a lot!

Do we know when Beth and Matt are going to be on Oprah?

Yes, a week from today Wednesday the 16th


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 09, 2008, 09:20:57 PM
Well Monkeys...helping the little guy with homework and posting..lol..getting tired. Have a good night all and keep the faith!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 09, 2008, 09:21:54 PM
O/T

Breaking News >> 6.4 Magnitude Earthquake Strikes Off Oregon Coast, USGS Reports
 

sending them prayers on my way out of the cage!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: NM on January 09, 2008, 09:25:06 PM
So true, Klaas. We have certainly learned a lot!

Do we know when Beth and Matt are going to be on Oprah?
Hey Mishy 1/16


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: mishy on January 09, 2008, 09:27:54 PM
O/T

Breaking News >> 6.4 Magnitude Earthquake Strikes Off Oregon Coast, USGS Reports
 

 :shock: :shock: :shock:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: mishy on January 09, 2008, 09:28:37 PM
So true, Klaas. We have certainly learned a lot!

Do we know when Beth and Matt are going to be on Oprah?

Yes, a week from today Wednesday the 16th

Thanks Klaas. Going to set up my tivo now...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: mishy on January 09, 2008, 09:29:58 PM
So true, Klaas. We have certainly learned a lot!

Do we know when Beth and Matt are going to be on Oprah?
Hey Mishy 1/16

Thanks NM  :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 09, 2008, 09:33:16 PM
Oprah will offer Beth an audience of possibly 20,000,000 viewers that she can share the details of her ordeal in Aruba and possibly bring the viewers up to date news on the current affairs of Aruba's affairs. While she must not libel or slander anyone, she could tell the following:

1. Joran was the last known person with Natalee. It is alleged that he broke during interrogation and revealed that something bad happened to her and they buried her near the fishermans hut, but that he refused to sign the "confession" after being allowed to be comforted and advised by his parents. She could also show photo's of Joran subsequently leading the police to the fishermans hut where he said she was buried.

2. That the boys immediately began a series of lies designed to obstruct the search for Natalee, and point out that as in all searches time was of the essence as it is a life or death situation. And she can even defend the boys behavior explaining that Deepaks mother said all boys lie and the other excuse that they were simply scared teenagers not wanting to be in trouble for leaving a girl on the beach, and they were so scared that the fact that her life was in imminent danger was irrelevant to them.

3. They lied and framed 2 innocent black men, that the police chose to give them enough credibility to deprive these 2 men of their liberty and to charge them with murder, that the police released the boys without searching their property, and that the police immediately busted into the 2 mens homes unannounced to arrest them and search the premises and property, after already discovering that the boys, who were the least seen with her, had lied about their stories, repeatedly.

4. That Aruba has already had a case where racism was alleged, Eduardo Mathew, who successfully filed an appeal claiming he was abused as a prisoner in the KIA Detention Center. But point out that just because it appears that Aruba has serious race issues, it isn't necessarly so. Could be coincidence.

5. Anita, Joran's Mom, was knowledgable of the color, style, and pattern of Natalee's panties.

6. She could play the audio recording of the boys conversation in the back of the police car, replaying the comment by Depak saying, "Your own father!"

7. Replay Dompigs statement that the boys were obviously guilty as hell.

8. That Minister of Justice Rudy Croes was alleged by his own country's media to have been caught with 3 sex slaves he was planning on prostituting. Of course she could explain that government officials in Aruba aren't that well paid and they have to moonlight to make end meets. Point out that he has another night job and that it is developing a $65,000,000 project in Aruba. Pretty good for the son of a school teacher who died at an early age, who grew up to be a lab technician prior to becoming the Minister of Justice. And she could point out just how smart he must be since he doesn't even have any legal experience or a law degree.

5. That Guido Wever claimed that Joran and him were lovers at one time.

6. That Deepak allegedly claimed that he, his brother, and Joran had sex in the same room at the same time with the same girl on occassions. Considering Guido's claim, there is no reason to believe that the situation was awkward for the boys.

And the list could go on. Hopefully a high lights video of the story of the Natalee Holloway case. Maybe even point out that Renfroe states that any parent who would send their teenagers or young adults to Aruba without direct parental supervision deserves what happened to Beth, and in fact should be charged with manslaughter.

Being careful not to accuse anyone, but just replaying the public news concerning the case. She could also point out that Joran's attorney has a home in Sicily as well as New York and is a very prominent defense attorney. And based upon the people he represents, he must be damn good.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Dayhiker on January 09, 2008, 09:48:48 PM
Nice summation, PI. I am most excited that Beth will have an opportunity to sell a million or more books off of this show. Once millions of more more hear Beth's story firsthand and read the book there is no way in hell they or their family and friends will ever want to go to that shitbox known as Aruba.

It ain't over until Beth says it's over.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: AZSunny on January 09, 2008, 09:54:57 PM
Nice summation, PI. I am most excited that Beth will have an opportunity to sell a million or more books off of this show. Once millions of more more hear Beth's story firsthand and read the book there is no way in hell they or their family and friends will ever want to go to that shitbox known as Aruba.

It ain't over until Beth says it's over.


I wish that both PI's story and Beth's book feature could be shared.  It is about time the world knew. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 09, 2008, 09:57:38 PM
Excellent compilation PI.  I suggest that you send it to Beth immediately for her consideration.

Janet



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 09, 2008, 10:00:30 PM

I always have to rely on appreciated updates that are posted by Monkeys on the forum as ... my cable package does not include Fox Channel as well as the other channel which host Natalee's family members as guests.  I am thankful for the unofficial transcripts which are posted very quickly as well as the official transcripts and Carpe's YouTube videos which usually appear the following day on the respective media websites.

This interview will be different and ... I am sooo excited.  I do received the Oprah Winfrey show.  I will be recording the entire program.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: sharon on January 09, 2008, 10:06:24 PM
Nice summation, PI. I am most excited that Beth will have an opportunity to sell a million or more books off of this show. Once millions of more more hear Beth's story firsthand and read the book there is no way in hell they or their family and friends will ever want to go to that shitbox known as Aruba.

It ain't over until Beth says it's over.


So absolutely true, Dayhiker.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Observer on January 09, 2008, 10:10:19 PM
I wish these Investigative Journalist would actually read that transcript for once as Joe T has said over and over again those tapes show his client has no idea where Natalee is. You will get 15 years if they find the girl tells us the exact opposite.

 Beth can also tell everyone what Judge Wit said 2 weeks ago about Dompig and the OM. Not only was most of the property not searched but the Judge said Dompig obstructed Justice because he wanted the Van Der Sloots to have there privacy. He also said that the OM never requested to search anything more than just Jorans Apt. They are caught,not only in this lie but many others. We know Peter De Vries told us the poilice were shocked when they got to the VDS Residence and found out the Judge changed the search warrant to just Jorans Apt and 2 cars. After reading most everything I am convinced there was a confession and blood in Deepak's vehicle. Bumbling mistakes made over and over again by friends of Paul Van Der Sloot? Not a chance!

Since when do Murder and Kidnapping suspects get immunity from having their property searched?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 09, 2008, 10:29:14 PM
Nice summation, PI. I am most excited that Beth will have an opportunity to sell a million or more books off of this show. Once millions of more more hear Beth's story firsthand and read the book there is no way in hell they or their family and friends will ever want to go to that shitbox known as Aruba.

It ain't over until Beth says it's over.



Amen!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Observer on January 09, 2008, 10:45:18 PM
I see Kawish and Michael Dompig are both trying to be Aruba's next top model. I wonder if GVC dropped out because he's been dabbling in the islands imports too much?

(http://img340.imageshack.us/img340/5418/kawishat8.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)
(http://img504.imageshack.us/img504/8991/dompiglt3.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)


http://www.arubamodelsearch.com/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 09, 2008, 10:46:38 PM
In English now:

(http://www.amigoe.com/english/images/01-09-ongeluk-conchi.jpg)

Tourist drowns at Conchi 

A Bulgarian tourist has drowned yesterday after having fallen into the rough sea near the bathing-place Conchi, a popular tourist attraction at the northern coast of the island.

ORANJESTAD – A tourist drowned yesterday around 11:00, when he fell in the rough seas right outside the bathing-place at Conchi in the Arikok national park. The Natural Pool, as referred to by the tourists, is a popular attraction and lies at the northern coast of the island.  The 30-year old Bulgarian tourist was swimming with friends in the natural poolFor still unknown reasons, the man fell from the rocks at Conchi in the sea that was rougher than usual due to the hard winds of the last days.   

Two rescue teams tried to reach the area where the man has fallen in the water.  By means of ropes tied to a jeep, one of the teams succeeded, but the man had already died.  When salvaging the body, one of the rescue workers got lightly injured, when a big wave threw him against a rock. 

The foundation that manages the national park including Conchi knows about the danger of the rough see near the natural pool.  We have placed a considerable amount of signs warning the vacationers for the danger, says Ambrosio Curiel of the National Park Arikok Foundation.  After yesterday’s incident, the foundation is considering placing park rangers again at the location to keep an eye on the people. 

Curiel regrets the accident with the Bulgarian tourist.  “It is tragic, but the location attracts people.  It has a beautiful view, but a visit is not without danger.  Waves more than three meters high have been seen at that location.” 


Sad :sad:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 09, 2008, 10:48:42 PM
******* - wasn't that last years contest?  Aruba Model Search 2007  :wink:



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: dennisintn on January 09, 2008, 10:51:29 PM
Oprah will offer Beth an audience of possibly 20,000,000 viewers that she can share the details of her ordeal in Aruba and possibly bring the viewers up to date news on the current affairs of Aruba's affairs. While she must not libel or slander anyone, she could tell the following:

1. Joran was the last known person with Natalee. It is alleged that he broke during interrogation and revealed that something bad happened to her and they buried her near the fishermans hut, but that he refused to sign the "confession" after being allowed to be comforted and advised by his parents. She could also show photo's of Joran subsequently leading the police to the fishermans hut where he said she was buried.

2. That the boys immediately began a series of lies designed to obstruct the search for Natalee, and point out that as in all searches time was of the essence as it is a life or death situation. And she can even defend the boys behavior explaining that Deepaks mother said all boys lie and the other excuse that they were simply scared teenagers not wanting to be in trouble for leaving a girl on the beach, and they were so scared that the fact that her life was in imminent danger was irrelevant to them.

3. They lied and framed 2 innocent black men, that the police chose to give them enough credibility to deprive these 2 men of their liberty and to charge them with murder, that the police released the boys without searching their property, and that the police immediately busted into the 2 mens homes unannounced to arrest them and search the premises and property, after already discovering that the boys, who were the least seen with her, had lied about their stories, repeatedly.

4. That Aruba has already had a case where racism was alleged, Eduardo Mathew, who successfully filed an appeal claiming he was abused as a prisoner in the KIA Detention Center. But point out that just because it appears that Aruba has serious race issues, it isn't necessarly so. Could be coincidence.

5. Anita, Joran's Mom, was knowledgable of the color, style, and pattern of Natalee's panties.

6. She could play the audio recording of the boys conversation in the back of the police car, replaying the comment by Depak saying, "Your own father!"

7. Replay Dompigs statement that the boys were obviously guilty as hell.

8. That Minister of Justice Rudy Croes was alleged by his own country's media to have been caught with 3 sex slaves he was planning on prostituting. Of course she could explain that government officials in Aruba aren't that well paid and they have to moonlight to make end meets. Point out that he has another night job and that it is developing a $65,000,000 project in Aruba. Pretty good for the son of a school teacher who died at an early age, who grew up to be a lab technician prior to becoming the Minister of Justice. And she could point out just how smart he must be since he doesn't even have any legal experience or a law degree.

5. That Guido Wever claimed that Joran and him were lovers at one time.

6. That Deepak allegedly claimed that he, his brother, and Joran had sex in the same room at the same time with the same girl on occassions. Considering Guido's claim, there is no reason to believe that the situation was awkward for the boys.

And the list could go on. Hopefully a high lights video of the story of the Natalee Holloway case. Maybe even point out that Renfroe states that any parent who would send their teenagers or young adults to Aruba without direct parental supervision deserves what happened to Beth, and in fact should be charged with manslaughter.

Being careful not to accuse anyone, but just replaying the public news concerning the case. She could also point out that Joran's attorney has a home in Sicily as well as New York and is a very prominent defense attorney. And based upon the people he represents, he must be damn good.
and for sure, show that video of the dressed to the hilt aruban businessman, at the dump in the sweltering heat and stink, watching dave and jossy's son digging amongst the rotting garbage for his daughter's body, telling greta that beth just needed to go home, shut up, and get over it.  a true example of aruba's good heartedness and goodwill towards americans.  that will go over real big.
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 09, 2008, 10:56:39 PM
I don't know how it seems to other people, but Beth IS NOT profiting from Natalee's death, and people who think so are simply not aware of her plan, or at least my perception of her plan. She was quoted early on as promising the powers to be in Aruba that she would be the voice of Natalee seeking justice for her until her last breath on earth. Seeking justice for Natalee was to become her new career. In order to do that she began a foundation that allowed her to speak out to large audiences while earning a living doing it, thus "endowing the message" to ensure Natalee's words are heard until justice was found. Writing a book enabled her to further speak out for Natalee in print, memorializing the words of Natalee and the deeds of the guilty for eternity, while once again funding an endowment that will assure her of the ability to live her life speaking out for justice for Natalee.

In order to do this she took a huge risk. She left a very good career working with children, and at the age of, I better withhold that, and while grieving for the loss of her daughter, she embarked on a career of public speaking and book writing even though she had no prior experience or education in either field. This is even more remarkable considering that she had another child due to begin college in a couple of years at that time. Even facing a divorce and life as the sole provider for her and her son she kept loyal to her promise. She never looked back, and never doubted she could be self supporting allowing her to do what she promised Aruba she was going to do, speak out for justice for Natalee, full time, until she breathed her last breath.

I would say she did all of this on her own, but it is obvious to the world she did this with the strength and love of people like you all who cared enough to get involved and help her speak out. I believe despite the loss, which has surely been great, she feels to a certain degree blessed to have your support.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Observer on January 09, 2008, 10:58:44 PM
******* - wasn't that last years contest?  Aruba Model Search 2007  :wink:



I was looking for GVC..Where is he? Clearly this is their best model in the Middle..He's got the look  :lol:
(http://img146.imageshack.us/img146/640/normaldscf1928yq0.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 09, 2008, 10:59:25 PM
There is no reason for her to personally accuse anyone at this time. She can merely cause the airwaves to be filled with the various newsclips and videos of the case. They tell the story quite well and the viewers can come to their own conclusions. The way it should be.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 09, 2008, 11:01:05 PM
******* - wasn't that last years contest?  Aruba Model Search 2007  :wink:



I was looking for GVC..Where is he? Clearly this is their best model in the Middle..He's got the look  :lol:
(http://img146.imageshack.us/img146/640/normaldscf1928yq0.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)



Dazed and confused???????????? Or slovenly and sorry:))))))))))) Just kidding


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 09, 2008, 11:01:24 PM
Regarding Ophra with a home on Aruba, it was widely discussed here several years ago.  Perhaps I accepted the info in good faith.  Who knows, sorry wasn't trying to deliver misinformation. 

Miss AZ,

I didn't think you were. I was thinking more of gee I must be losing my memory cuz I don't recall Gail and Oprah in Aruba heh heh.


Thank you Magnolia you little dar'ln for finding where her homes are. I knew I saw that house in Hawaii.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 09, 2008, 11:02:29 PM
Its ashame that Oprah won't let us produce this show!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The nerve of her::::::::))))))))))))))))


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 09, 2008, 11:04:39 PM
Regarding Ophra with a home on Aruba, it was widely discussed here several years ago.  Perhaps I accepted the info in good faith.  Who knows, sorry wasn't trying to deliver misinformation. 

Miss AZ,

I didn't think you were. I was thinking more of gee I must be losing my memory cuz I don't recall Gail and Oprah in Aruba heh heh.


Thank you Magnolia you little dar'ln for finding where her homes are. I knew I saw that house in Hawaii.



She could easily have owned homes in both places, and she might not even remember it !!! But she made all of her money the old fashion way, she worked for it and she should enjoy her success!!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 09, 2008, 11:05:07 PM
Oprah will offer Beth an audience of possibly 20,000,000 viewers that she can share the details of her ordeal in Aruba and possibly bring the viewers up to date news on the current affairs of Aruba's affairs. While she must not libel or slander anyone, she could tell the following:

1. Joran was the last known person with Natalee. It is alleged that he broke during interrogation and revealed that something bad happened to her and they buried her near the fishermans hut, but that he refused to sign the "confession" after being allowed to be comforted and advised by his parents. She could also show photo's of Joran subsequently leading the police to the fishermans hut where he said she was buried.

2. That the boys immediately began a series of lies designed to obstruct the search for Natalee, and point out that as in all searches time was of the essence as it is a life or death situation. And she can even defend the boys behavior explaining that Deepaks mother said all boys lie and the other excuse that they were simply scared teenagers not wanting to be in trouble for leaving a girl on the beach, and they were so scared that the fact that her life was in imminent danger was irrelevant to them.

3. They lied and framed 2 innocent black men, that the police chose to give them enough credibility to deprive these 2 men of their liberty and to charge them with murder, that the police released the boys without searching their property, and that the police immediately busted into the 2 mens homes unannounced to arrest them and search the premises and property, after already discovering that the boys, who were the least seen with her, had lied about their stories, repeatedly.

4. That Aruba has already had a case where racism was alleged, Eduardo Mathew, who successfully filed an appeal claiming he was abused as a prisoner in the KIA Detention Center. But point out that just because it appears that Aruba has serious race issues, it isn't necessarly so. Could be coincidence.

5. Anita, Joran's Mom, was knowledgable of the color, style, and pattern of Natalee's panties.

6. She could play the audio recording of the boys conversation in the back of the police car, replaying the comment by Depak saying, "Your own father!"

7. Replay Dompigs statement that the boys were obviously guilty as hell.

8. That Minister of Justice Rudy Croes was alleged by his own country's media to have been caught with 3 sex slaves he was planning on prostituting. Of course she could explain that government officials in Aruba aren't that well paid and they have to moonlight to make end meets. Point out that he has another night job and that it is developing a $65,000,000 project in Aruba. Pretty good for the son of a school teacher who died at an early age, who grew up to be a lab technician prior to becoming the Minister of Justice. And she could point out just how smart he must be since he doesn't even have any legal experience or a law degree.

5. That Guido Wever claimed that Joran and him were lovers at one time.

 :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:
BROKEBACK ARUBAN STYLE

6. That Deepak allegedly claimed that he, his brother, and Joran had sex in the same room at the same time with the same girl on occassions. Considering Guido's claim, there is no reason to believe that the situation was awkward for the boys.

And the list could go on. Hopefully a high lights video of the story of the Natalee Holloway case. Maybe even point out that Renfroe states that any parent who would send their teenagers or young adults to Aruba without direct parental supervision deserves what happened to Beth, and in fact should be charged with manslaughter.

Being careful not to accuse anyone, but just replaying the public news concerning the case. She could also point out that Joran's attorney has a home in Sicily as well as New York and is a very prominent defense attorney. And based upon the people he represents, he must be damn good.

TRUE PI VERY TRUE - JUST A RE-CAP OF THE TRUTH



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 09, 2008, 11:07:51 PM
Nice summation, PI. I am most excited that Beth will have an opportunity to sell a million or more books off of this show. Once millions of more more hear Beth's story firsthand and read the book there is no way in hell they or their family and friends will ever want to go to that shitbox known as Aruba.

It ain't over until Beth says it's over.


"I am willing to wait out all their lies to get to the truth. I have the rest of my life to find out what has happened to Natalee." (p. 98 Beth Holloway)



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 09, 2008, 11:11:07 PM
I see Kawish and Michael Dompig are both trying to be Aruba's next top model. I wonder if GVC dropped out because he's been dabbling in the islands imports too much?

(http://img340.imageshack.us/img340/5418/kawishat8.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)
(http://img504.imageshack.us/img504/8991/dompiglt3.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)


http://www.arubamodelsearch.com/


Roland Halley was Mister World model or something.
His dad is the crooked cop.

Ernesto (freddy's brother) is another model.

follow up on that model agency - it seemed to me to be some kind of front is all.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 09, 2008, 11:16:29 PM
I don't know how it seems to other people, but Beth IS NOT profiting from Natalee's death, and people who think so are simply not aware of her plan, or at least my perception of her plan. She was quoted early on as promising the powers to be in Aruba that she would be the voice of Natalee seeking justice for her until her last breath on earth. Seeking justice for Natalee was to become her new career. In order to do that she began a foundation that allowed her to speak out to large audiences while earning a living doing it, thus "endowing the message" to ensure Natalee's words are heard until justice was found. Writing a book enabled her to further speak out for Natalee in print, memorializing the words of Natalee and the deeds of the guilty for eternity, while once again funding an endowment that will assure her of the ability to live her life speaking out for justice for Natalee.

In order to do this she took a huge risk. She left a very good career working with children, and at the age of, I better withhold that, and while grieving for the loss of her daughter, she embarked on a career of public speaking and book writing even though she had no prior experience or education in either field. This is even more remarkable considering that she had another child due to begin college in a couple of years at that time. Even facing a divorce and life as the sole provider for her and her son she kept loyal to her promise. She never looked back, and never doubted she could be self supporting allowing her to do what she promised Aruba she was going to do, speak out for justice for Natalee, full time, until she breathed her last breath.

I would say she did all of this on her own, but it is obvious to the world she did this with the strength and love of people like you all who cared enough to get involved and help her speak out. I believe despite the loss, which has surely been great, she feels to a certain degree blessed to have your support.

One thing ,of the many I admire Beth for is going on all of the cable shows to
keep Natalee's story in the forefront.  I couldn't have done that to save my life.
But she did.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 09, 2008, 11:16:36 PM
I don't know how it seems to other people, but Beth IS NOT profiting from Natalee's death, and people who think so are simply not aware of her plan, or at least my perception of her plan. She was quoted early on as promising the powers to be in Aruba that she would be the voice of Natalee seeking justice for her until her last breath on earth. Seeking justice for Natalee was to become her new career. In order to do that she began a foundation that allowed her to speak out to large audiences while earning a living doing it, thus "endowing the message" to ensure Natalee's words are heard until justice was found. Writing a book enabled her to further speak out for Natalee in print, memorializing the words of Natalee and the deeds of the guilty for eternity, while once again funding an endowment that will assure her of the ability to live her life speaking out for justice for Natalee.

In order to do this she took a huge risk. She left a very good career working with children, and at the age of, I better withhold that, and while grieving for the loss of her daughter, she embarked on a career of public speaking and book writing even though she had no prior experience or education in either field. This is even more remarkable considering that she had another child due to begin college in a couple of years at that time. Even facing a divorce and life as the sole provider for her and her son she kept loyal to her promise. She never looked back, and never doubted she could be self supporting allowing her to do what she promised Aruba she was going to do, speak out for justice for Natalee, full time, until she breathed her last breath.

I would say she did all of this on her own, but it is obvious to the world she did this with the strength and love of people like you all who cared enough to get involved and help her speak out. I believe despite the loss, which has surely been great, she feels to a certain degree blessed to have your support.

This is just my thinking, I don't give a hoot'n nanny about money or money Beth may or may not make/earn/get.
Aruba is responsible for cover-ing up a crime committed against her daughter. A girl who was only 18 years old did not deserve to die. And those responsible all the way up the chain of command - need to be exposed and held accountable. The world will not tolerate anything less. Beth deserves the truth. And she deserves to have her daughter brought home - to AMERICA!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 09, 2008, 11:16:41 PM
I see Kawish and Michael Dompig are both trying to be Aruba's next top model. I wonder if GVC dropped out because he's been dabbling in the islands imports too much?

(http://img340.imageshack.us/img340/5418/kawishat8.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)
(http://img504.imageshack.us/img504/8991/dompiglt3.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)


http://www.arubamodelsearch.com/


Roland Halley was Mister World model or something.
His dad is the crooked cop.

Ernesto (freddy's brother) is another model.

follow up on that model agency - it seemed to me to be some kind of front is all.




Are all Arubians this ugly?????????? Surely not. These must be the elite of their ugly!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 09, 2008, 11:18:24 PM
I don't know how it seems to other people, but Beth IS NOT profiting from Natalee's death, and people who think so are simply not aware of her plan, or at least my perception of her plan. She was quoted early on as promising the powers to be in Aruba that she would be the voice of Natalee seeking justice for her until her last breath on earth. Seeking justice for Natalee was to become her new career. In order to do that she began a foundation that allowed her to speak out to large audiences while earning a living doing it, thus "endowing the message" to ensure Natalee's words are heard until justice was found. Writing a book enabled her to further speak out for Natalee in print, memorializing the words of Natalee and the deeds of the guilty for eternity, while once again funding an endowment that will assure her of the ability to live her life speaking out for justice for Natalee.

In order to do this she took a huge risk. She left a very good career working with children, and at the age of, I better withhold that, and while grieving for the loss of her daughter, she embarked on a career of public speaking and book writing even though she had no prior experience or education in either field. This is even more remarkable considering that she had another child due to begin college in a couple of years at that time. Even facing a divorce and life as the sole provider for her and her son she kept loyal to her promise. She never looked back, and never doubted she could be self supporting allowing her to do what she promised Aruba she was going to do, speak out for justice for Natalee, full time, until she breathed her last breath.

I would say she did all of this on her own, but it is obvious to the world she did this with the strength and love of people like you all who cared enough to get involved and help her speak out. I believe despite the loss, which has surely been great, she feels to a certain degree blessed to have your support.

This is just my thinking, I don't give a hoot'n nanny about money or money Beth may or may not make/earn/get.
Aruba is responsible for cover-ing up a crime committed against her daughter. A girl who was only 18 years old did not deserve to die. And those responsible all the way up the chain of command - need to be exposed and held accountable. The world will not tolerate anything less. Beth deserves the truth. And she deserves to have her daughter brought home - to AMERICA!



I hate to repeat myself, but AMEN seems the only appropriate response. She is simply keeping her word!!!!!!!!!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Observer on January 09, 2008, 11:18:49 PM
I would say she did all of this on her own, but it is obvious to the world she did this with the strength and love of people like you all who cared enough to get involved and help her speak out. I believe despite the loss, which has surely been great, she feels to a certain degree blessed to have your support.
-------------------
Very touching PI! We care a great deal about Beth and we are all very aware at what is being said or not said at other forums about her. Most of us have never met Natalee,Beth or any member of the Family but I assure you each and every one of us feels like they are Family. We have always been here for Beth and will continue to be until Natalee is home and her Family gets the answers they deserve. Beth is a inspiration for many here and this is her home.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 09, 2008, 11:20:43 PM
I see Kawish and Michael Dompig are both trying to be Aruba's next top model. I wonder if GVC dropped out because he's been dabbling in the islands imports too much?

(http://img340.imageshack.us/img340/5418/kawishat8.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)
(http://img504.imageshack.us/img504/8991/dompiglt3.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)


http://www.arubamodelsearch.com/


Roland Halley was Mister World model or something.
His dad is the crooked cop.

Ernesto (freddy's brother) is another model.

follow up on that model agency - it seemed to me to be some kind of front is all.




I feel bad having made fun of their appearances. That they cannot help.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 09, 2008, 11:24:47 PM
I have limited posting priviliges at home and I have been told I have reached that limit!!!!! Good night. I hate getting bossed around all of the time!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 09, 2008, 11:27:34 PM
I have limited posting priviliges at home and I have been told I have reached that limit!!!!! Good night. I hate getting bossed around all of the time!!!

 :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 09, 2008, 11:30:17 PM
I have limited posting priviliges at home and I have been told I have reached that limit!!!!! Good night. I hate getting bossed around all of the time!!!

Nite Private Eye  :D


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Observer on January 09, 2008, 11:35:53 PM

Are all Arubians this ugly?????????? Surely not. These must be the elite of their ugly!!!!

Kawish reminds me a bit like Deepak with that stare  :shock: They are probably related also  :lol: Night!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 09, 2008, 11:44:27 PM
I've watched Oprah several times lately and the shows were all repeats....not that I saw them all before, but having checked out her website found out they all were.  Glad to know that new shows are on next week, especially Wednesday with Beth and Matt.  PI said something about the taping being done early next week, which surprised me, because I thought these shows were done in advance (more advance than a couple days).....no matter....In my area, Oprah is on at 4PM on ABC....she used to be rerun later at night, but I don't know if that is still the case.  I'm assuming that she may be on at different times in different areas. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 10, 2008, 12:02:48 AM
As already posted, Beth and Matt will be on Oprah 1/16/08 (Wednesday).

Go to this link to find out what time and channel Oprah is on in your area:

http://www.oprah.com/tows/program/tows_prog_whenwhere.jhtml


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Observer on January 10, 2008, 12:18:05 AM
10.17.2005
Government has its hand over Michael Posner’s head? Notorious Chicago figure active in Aruba casino
DIARIO Aruba



ORANJESTAD (AAN): Some time ago DIARIO found information regarding the manager of the Holiday Inn’s Excelsior Casino and people have been calling out to ask how a figure with a criminal past of such an extent can be active in the casino industry of Aruba.

His name? Michael Posner, owner (or one of the owners) of the Brickel Hotel situated in front of the big hotels in Malmok. In the past he was arrested in the state of Illinois for violation of the Ricco Act (racketeering) and because he was also involved in the world of prostitution.

He was condemned to 10 years in prison, but apparently he served 8 out of the 10 years. He appealed his case and lost the appeal! After he was released he was on parole for 5 years. His name is also mentioned as an associate of a notorious family.

DIARIO knows that the government is at the height of such people, and asks how he can be active in the casino industry of Aruba. How did he find a permit to work in this branch with the background that he has? How has the Minister of Justice still not taken action against him? Now that his criminal past is known, what is the government waiting for to take him out of Aruba?

During the [election] campaign which recently came to an end, many comments and rumours were circulating regarding contributions to certain politicians, including those in the [current] government. DIARIO hopes that the issue of campaign moneys remain a rumour, because if true, then there are more politicians for sale than is [already] apparent.

The presence of Michael Posner in the Aruba casino industry, with the criminal past that he has, does not speak well of the judicial control system, nor that of National Security, nor of those in charge to check the background of those who work in the tourism industry of Aruba.

This is the damage that one person with such a bad reputation, who was incarcerated during 8 years, who is associated with a notorious family in America, can cause to the tourism of Aruba.
http://tinyurl.com/2mslqw


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: texasmom on January 10, 2008, 12:46:35 AM
I don't know how it seems to other people, but Beth IS NOT profiting from Natalee's death, and people who think so are simply not aware of her plan, or at least my perception of her plan. She was quoted early on as promising the powers to be in Aruba that she would be the voice of Natalee seeking justice for her until her last breath on earth. Seeking justice for Natalee was to become her new career. In order to do that she began a foundation that allowed her to speak out to large audiences while earning a living doing it, thus "endowing the message" to ensure Natalee's words are heard until justice was found. Writing a book enabled her to further speak out for Natalee in print, memorializing the words of Natalee and the deeds of the guilty for eternity, while once again funding an endowment that will assure her of the ability to live her life speaking out for justice for Natalee.

In order to do this she took a huge risk. She left a very good career working with children, and at the age of, I better withhold that, and while grieving for the loss of her daughter, she embarked on a career of public speaking and book writing even though she had no prior experience or education in either field. This is even more remarkable considering that she had another child due to begin college in a couple of years at that time. Even facing a divorce and life as the sole provider for her and her son she kept loyal to her promise. She never looked back, and never doubted she could be self supporting allowing her to do what she promised Aruba she was going to do, speak out for justice for Natalee, full time, until she breathed her last breath.

I would say she did all of this on her own, but it is obvious to the world she did this with the strength and love of people like you all who cared enough to get involved and help her speak out. I believe despite the loss, which has surely been great, she feels to a certain degree blessed to have your support.

This is just my thinking, I don't give a hoot'n nanny about money or money Beth may or may not make/earn/get.
Aruba is responsible for cover-ing up a crime committed against her daughter. A girl who was only 18 years old did not deserve to die. And those responsible all the way up the chain of command - need to be exposed and held accountable. The world will not tolerate anything less. Beth deserves the truth. And she deserves to have her daughter brought home - to AMERICA!



I hate to repeat myself, but AMEN seems the only appropriate response. She is simply keeping her word!!!!!!!!!!!!

and AMEN again, and ribbit too!

I hope Oprah will show the news conference of Beth after the K2 release,

"Two suspects were released yesterday who were involved in a violent crime against my daughter.  I am asking mothers and fathers in all nations to hear my plea.  Do not allow the Kalpoe brothers to enter your country until this case is solved.  Do not allow these criminals to walk among your citizens.  Help me by not allowing these two to get away with this crime, in the name of my beautiful daughter whom I have not seen in thirty-six days and for whom I will continue to search until I find her."

Beth quotes her words from that day in her book on pages 156-157, and although reading it brought the tears all over again for me, it was because I heard her words that day on national television and felt her pain.  Did the Aruban people feel her pain that day?  Beth reflects in her book that many Arubans were offended by her using the term "criminals" in her speech which led to fewer prayer vigils, protesters against the negative media, her being unwelcome at the Holiday Inn, and the forming of the Strategic Communications Task force to combat the negative media, and the family as Beth states.  My perception of the reaction is that Beth hit a nerve.  She had just told the world what this "dirty little island" had full intentions of doing and every mother and father on that island knew it.  They all knew that even though the K2 could go anywhere they chose to, they would stay right there and never be prosecuted for their crime.  The citizens knew how the crime against Natalee had been covered up and that all involved would "walk freely among their citizens" because none of them would dare do anything about it.  Beth had in essence called all of them "criminals" because their silence that protects the dirty secrets involves all of them in the crime. It was easier to try to run Beth and family off of the island and hope that the world would forget about what happened to Natalee than to do the right thing.  JMO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: texasmom on January 10, 2008, 01:06:59 AM
10.17.2005
Government has its hand over Michael Posner’s head? Notorious Chicago figure active in Aruba casino
DIARIO Aruba



ORANJESTAD (AAN): Some time ago DIARIO found information regarding the manager of the Holiday Inn’s Excelsior Casino and people have been calling out to ask how a figure with a criminal past of such an extent can be active in the casino industry of Aruba.

His name? Michael Posner, owner (or one of the owners) of the Brickel Hotel situated in front of the big hotels in Malmok. In the past he was arrested in the state of Illinois for violation of the Ricco Act (racketeering) and because he was also involved in the world of prostitution.

He was condemned to 10 years in prison, but apparently he served 8 out of the 10 years. He appealed his case and lost the appeal! After he was released he was on parole for 5 years. His name is also mentioned as an associate of a notorious family.

DIARIO knows that the government is at the height of such people, and asks how he can be active in the casino industry of Aruba. How did he find a permit to work in this branch with the background that he has? How has the Minister of Justice still not taken action against him? Now that his criminal past is known, what is the government waiting for to take him out of Aruba?

During the [election] campaign which recently came to an end, many comments and rumours were circulating regarding contributions to certain politicians, including those in the [current] government. DIARIO hopes that the issue of campaign moneys remain a rumour, because if true, then there are more politicians for sale than is [already] apparent.

The presence of Michael Posner in the Aruba casino industry, with the criminal past that he has, does not speak well of the judicial control system, nor that of National Security, nor of those in charge to check the background of those who work in the tourism industry of Aruba.

This is the damage that one person with such a bad reputation, who was incarcerated during 8 years, who is associated with a notorious family in America, can cause to the tourism of Aruba.
http://tinyurl.com/2mslqw

In light of my previous post there is a hero among the Aruban people, Jossy Mansur  :smt041


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: crazybabyborg on January 10, 2008, 01:11:34 AM
Yes, Jossy is a man of principle among a den of thieves and thugs.

I haven't seen anything from him during the ocean search. Have I just missed it, or has he been quiet lately?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Observer on January 10, 2008, 01:13:38 AM
Jose Trump missing since November 27th 2007
Thats a huge reward!!  :shock: :shock:
25,000,000 Aruban Florin = 14,124,294 US Dollars
14 million dollars? WOW! Is that right?
(http://img185.imageshack.us/img185/2054/tromprewarduh3.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: texasmom on January 10, 2008, 01:16:02 AM
I have limited posting priviliges at home and I have been told I have reached that limit!!!!! Good night. I hate getting bossed around all of the time!!!

You made very good use of your "limited postings" tonight PI.   :2notworthy:



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: crazybabyborg on January 10, 2008, 01:16:55 AM
Wonderful post, Private Eye! Beth is just the epitome of class and grace, with just the right touch of steel, IMO. She briefly mentioned that perhaps she would write a book on just the evidence, and I really do hope she will do that.

I keep thinking that someday, someone will make a movie out of this whole ordeal. I also hope that happens. I can't think of a better way to give exposure to the dangers that lurk in Aruba.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on January 10, 2008, 01:17:10 AM

Kawish reminds me a bit like Deepak with that stare  :shock:

I was thinking the same thing.  I was wondering what they were looking at that caused that. :shock:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: texasmom on January 10, 2008, 01:31:15 AM
Yes, Jossy is a man of principle among a den of thieves and thugs.

I haven't seen anything from him during the ocean search. Have I just missed it, or has he been quiet lately?

I think he's been quiet lately.  If there has been anything I missed it, but I've been looking....  I worry about him with all the corruption around him.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Observer on January 10, 2008, 01:35:17 AM

Kawish reminds me a bit like Deepak with that stare  :shock:

I was thinking the same thing.  I was wondering what they were looking at that caused that. :shock:
:shock: lol
(http://img81.imageshack.us/img81/8184/kawishtw8.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: texasmom on January 10, 2008, 01:36:33 AM

Kawish reminds me a bit like Deepak with that stare  :shock:

I was thinking the same thing.  I was wondering what they were looking at that caused that. :shock:

I thought the same thing also but it seems to me that Deepak's eye/eyes try to cross or something :-?...I don't think he can stare that dead-on :shock:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Observer on January 10, 2008, 01:41:35 AM

Kawish reminds me a bit like Deepak with that stare  :shock:

I was thinking the same thing.  I was wondering what they were looking at that caused that. :shock:

I thought the same thing also but it seems to me that Deepak's eye/eyes try to cross or something :-?...I don't think he can stare that dead-on :shock:

He look's like he is high as a kite on X in that pic.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: texasmom on January 10, 2008, 01:44:47 AM
OMG, *******, I almost went to find a picture of deepak before I made my post about the crossing of his eye/eyes but didn't and then when my post came up there it was, you'd gone and gotten it for me.  It's his right eye....

thanks!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Observer on January 10, 2008, 02:00:38 AM
OMG, *******, I almost went to find a picture of deepak before I made my post about the crossing of his eye/eyes but didn't and then when my post came up there it was, you'd gone and gotten it for me.  It's his right eye....

thanks!


YW :) That one eye does seem to be crossed. He just seems to look funny when he's looking straight ahead..lol
(http://img510.imageshack.us/img510/9232/kalpoefamilyes0.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: MumInOhio on January 10, 2008, 05:40:01 AM
I see Kawish and Michael Dompig are both trying to be Aruba's next top model. I wonder if GVC dropped out because he's been dabbling in the islands imports too much?

(http://img340.imageshack.us/img340/5418/kawishat8.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)
(http://img504.imageshack.us/img504/8991/dompiglt3.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)


http://www.arubamodelsearch.com/



*******...that name I asked about yesterday is there too...His name was on a Natalee blog with his tickle site. Second to last one... Shajir Croes


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: greeneyedlady on January 10, 2008, 08:15:20 AM
Oprah will offer Beth an audience of possibly 20,000,000 viewers that she can share the details of her ordeal in Aruba and possibly bring the viewers up to date news on the current affairs of Aruba's affairs. While she must not libel or slander anyone, she could tell the following:

1. Joran was the last known person with Natalee. It is alleged that he broke during interrogation and revealed that something bad happened to her and they buried her near the fishermans hut, but that he refused to sign the "confession" after being allowed to be comforted and advised by his parents. She could also show photo's of Joran subsequently leading the police to the fishermans hut where he said she was buried.

2. That the boys immediately began a series of lies designed to obstruct the search for Natalee, and point out that as in all searches time was of the essence as it is a life or death situation. And she can even defend the boys behavior explaining that Deepaks mother said all boys lie and the other excuse that they were simply scared teenagers not wanting to be in trouble for leaving a girl on the beach, and they were so scared that the fact that her life was in imminent danger was irrelevant to them.

3. They lied and framed 2 innocent black men, that the police chose to give them enough credibility to deprive these 2 men of their liberty and to charge them with murder, that the police released the boys without searching their property, and that the police immediately busted into the 2 mens homes unannounced to arrest them and search the premises and property, after already discovering that the boys, who were the least seen with her, had lied about their stories, repeatedly.

4. That Aruba has already had a case where racism was alleged, Eduardo Mathew, who successfully filed an appeal claiming he was abused as a prisoner in the KIA Detention Center. But point out that just because it appears that Aruba has serious race issues, it isn't necessarly so. Could be coincidence.

5. Anita, Joran's Mom, was knowledgable of the color, style, and pattern of Natalee's panties.

6. She could play the audio recording of the boys conversation in the back of the police car, replaying the comment by Depak saying, "Your own father!"

7. Replay Dompigs statement that the boys were obviously guilty as hell.

8. That Minister of Justice Rudy Croes was alleged by his own country's media to have been caught with 3 sex slaves he was planning on prostituting. Of course she could explain that government officials in Aruba aren't that well paid and they have to moonlight to make end meets. Point out that he has another night job and that it is developing a $65,000,000 project in Aruba. Pretty good for the son of a school teacher who died at an early age, who grew up to be a lab technician prior to becoming the Minister of Justice. And she could point out just how smart he must be since he doesn't even have any legal experience or a law degree.

5. That Guido Wever claimed that Joran and him were lovers at one time.

 :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:
BROKEBACK ARUBAN STYLE

6. That Deepak allegedly claimed that he, his brother, and Joran had sex in the same room at the same time with the same girl on occassions. Considering Guido's claim, there is no reason to believe that the situation was awkward for the boys.

And the list could go on. Hopefully a high lights video of the story of the Natalee Holloway case. Maybe even point out that Renfroe states that any parent who would send their teenagers or young adults to Aruba without direct parental supervision deserves what happened to Beth, and in fact should be charged with manslaughter.

Being careful not to accuse anyone, but just replaying the public news concerning the case. She could also point out that Joran's attorney has a home in Sicily as well as New York and is a very prominent defense attorney. And based upon the people he represents, he must be damn good.

TRUE PI VERY TRUE - JUST A RE-CAP OF THE TRUTH



BrokeBack Island? :P...sorry couldn't resist :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Vicki on January 10, 2008, 08:28:23 AM
Thank you CBB for my avatar....i love it....and Im so excited that Beth and Matt will be on Oprah....yes finally...Please, if you live in NY or Boston, come to the shows and be a voice for Natalee.They are VERY Important shows...We have donations for gas money or hotel rooms...or airline tickets..We have flyers, banners...cards...sweatshirts...and pens and tote bags..WE NEED PPL...please email me at JusticeforNatalee@gail.com.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: crazybabyborg on January 10, 2008, 09:38:18 AM
Thank you CBB for my avatar....i love it....and Im so excited that Beth and Matt will be on Oprah....yes finally...Please, if you live in NY or Boston, come to the shows and be a voice for Natalee.They are VERY Important shows...We have donations for gas money or hotel rooms...or airline tickets..We have flyers, banners...cards...sweatshirts...and pens and tote bags..WE NEED PPL...please email me at JusticeforNatalee@gail.com.

OH! I would love to be there! I don't think I could manage it, but if I could, are there tickets available? I'm excited about them being on the show too!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Jerry from Ohio on January 10, 2008, 09:39:23 AM

  I think that those kind of looks are supposed to be intimidating to us
******* ,  when I worked in corrections  we would see those new type of young prisoners come in thru intake and they would be all bid and Bold until some of the older hard core cons would have a midnight talk with them and then when they would come back out with tears all over there faces  most of the others knew what had just happened and the young man would soon learn that in prison looks don't intimidate quite a few of those men .
  I would give almost anything to see Joran the gallops and Paulis inside of a real Prison in the USA  and show just how brave they really are  .  My bet would that they would be stripped of everything that they brought in with them and then become girl friends for the lifers and others  and yes even Joran,  being big in size in prison does not mean being respected, that you have to earn  and when a group grabs you in a small room there is NOT really a lot you can do except use your head or $$, cigs,  dope ect if you can obtain it .




Kawish reminds me a bit like Deepak with that stare  :shock:

I was thinking the same thing.  I was wondering what they were looking at that caused that. :shock:
:shock: lol
(http://img81.imageshack.us/img81/8184/kawishtw8.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: dennisintn on January 10, 2008, 09:48:36 AM
Oprah will offer Beth an audience of possibly 20,000,000 viewers that she can share the details of her ordeal in Aruba and possibly bring the viewers up to date news on the current affairs of Aruba's affairs. While she must not libel or slander anyone, she could tell the following:

1. Joran was the last known person with Natalee. It is alleged that he broke during interrogation and revealed that something bad happened to her and they buried her near the fishermans hut, but that he refused to sign the "confession" after being allowed to be comforted and advised by his parents. She could also show photo's of Joran subsequently leading the police to the fishermans hut where he said she was buried.

2. That the boys immediately began a series of lies designed to obstruct the search for Natalee, and point out that as in all searches time was of the essence as it is a life or death situation. And she can even defend the boys behavior explaining that Deepaks mother said all boys lie and the other excuse that they were simply scared teenagers not wanting to be in trouble for leaving a girl on the beach, and they were so scared that the fact that her life was in imminent danger was irrelevant to them.

3. They lied and framed 2 innocent black men, that the police chose to give them enough credibility to deprive these 2 men of their liberty and to charge them with murder, that the police released the boys without searching their property, and that the police immediately busted into the 2 mens homes unannounced to arrest them and search the premises and property, after already discovering that the boys, who were the least seen with her, had lied about their stories, repeatedly.

4. That Aruba has already had a case where racism was alleged, Eduardo Mathew, who successfully filed an appeal claiming he was abused as a prisoner in the KIA Detention Center. But point out that just because it appears that Aruba has serious race issues, it isn't necessarly so. Could be coincidence.

5. Anita, Joran's Mom, was knowledgable of the color, style, and pattern of Natalee's panties.

6. She could play the audio recording of the boys conversation in the back of the police car, replaying the comment by Depak saying, "Your own father!"

7. Replay Dompigs statement that the boys were obviously guilty as hell.

8. That Minister of Justice Rudy Croes was alleged by his own country's media to have been caught with 3 sex slaves he was planning on prostituting. Of course she could explain that government officials in Aruba aren't that well paid and they have to moonlight to make end meets. Point out that he has another night job and that it is developing a $65,000,000 project in Aruba. Pretty good for the son of a school teacher who died at an early age, who grew up to be a lab technician prior to becoming the Minister of Justice. And she could point out just how smart he must be since he doesn't even have any legal experience or a law degree.

5. That Guido Wever claimed that Joran and him were lovers at one time.

6. That Deepak allegedly claimed that he, his brother, and Joran had sex in the same room at the same time with the same girl on occassions. Considering Guido's claim, there is no reason to believe that the situation was awkward for the boys.

And the list could go on. Hopefully a high lights video of the story of the Natalee Holloway case. Maybe even point out that Renfroe states that any parent who would send their teenagers or young adults to Aruba without direct parental supervision deserves what happened to Beth, and in fact should be charged with manslaughter.

Being careful not to accuse anyone, but just replaying the public news concerning the case. She could also point out that Joran's attorney has a home in Sicily as well as New York and is a very prominent defense attorney. And based upon the people he represents, he must be damn good.
http://translate.google.com/translate?sourceid=navclient&hl=en&u=http%3a%2f%2fwww%2etelegraaf%2enl%2fbinnenland%2f2606498%2fArubaans%5foffensief%5fin%5fzaak%2dHolloway%2ehtml

beth could add klpd and mos' current views on guilt or innocence from their own sources.
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Dayhiker on January 10, 2008, 09:51:37 AM

This is just my thinking, I don't give a hoot'n nanny about money or money Beth may or may not make/earn/get.
Aruba is responsible for cover-ing up a crime committed against her daughter. A girl who was only 18 years old did not deserve to die. And those responsible all the way up the chain of command - need to be exposed and held accountable. The world will not tolerate anything less. Beth deserves the truth. And she deserves to have her daughter brought home - to AMERICA!



I hate to repeat myself, but AMEN seems the only appropriate response. She is simply keeping her word!!!!!!!!!!!!


What is money better spent, saving students lives by warning them of the dangers of drug infested rape holes like Aruba or spending millions trying to cover up a crime?

Nobody in Aruba can blame Beth for using money to saves others lives by exposing the dangers her daughter incurred on Aruba. It is the Arubans who have wasted their money, destroyed their image and wrecked their economy by being corrupt.

Beth put their cops on the front door of the prime suspect's house in 24 hours and they chose to do nothing. Aruba deserves to rot in hell.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Dayhiker on January 10, 2008, 10:00:41 AM
10.17.2005
Government has its hand over Michael Posner’s head? Notorious Chicago figure active in Aruba casino
DIARIO Aruba



ORANJESTAD (AAN): Some time ago DIARIO found information regarding the manager of the Holiday Inn’s Excelsior Casino and people have been calling out to ask how a figure with a criminal past of such an extent can be active in the casino industry of Aruba.

His name? Michael Posner, owner (or one of the owners) of the Brickel Hotel situated in front of the big hotels in Malmok. In the past he was arrested in the state of Illinois for violation of the Ricco Act (racketeering) and because he was also involved in the world of prostitution.

He was condemned to 10 years in prison, but apparently he served 8 out of the 10 years. He appealed his case and lost the appeal! After he was released he was on parole for 5 years. His name is also mentioned as an associate of a notorious family.

DIARIO knows that the government is at the height of such people, and asks how he can be active in the casino industry of Aruba. How did he find a permit to work in this branch with the background that he has? How has the Minister of Justice still not taken action against him? Now that his criminal past is known, what is the government waiting for to take him out of Aruba?

During the [election] campaign which recently came to an end, many comments and rumours were circulating regarding contributions to certain politicians, including those in the [current] government. DIARIO hopes that the issue of campaign moneys remain a rumour, because if true, then there are more politicians for sale than is [already] apparent.

The presence of Michael Posner in the Aruba casino industry, with the criminal past that he has, does not speak well of the judicial control system, nor that of National Security, nor of those in charge to check the background of those who work in the tourism industry of Aruba.

This is the damage that one person with such a bad reputation, who was incarcerated during 8 years, who is associated with a notorious family in America, can cause to the tourism of Aruba.
http://tinyurl.com/2mslqw


Here again, what good are laws if they are not enforced? Michael Posner was a convicted Mafia felon. He should have never been able to own a casino in Aruba according to their own laws. Yet they welcome him with open arms. It just goes to show that the Mafia is running Aruba alongside the corrupt MEP government.

The Aruba/Dutch legal and judiciary system is a sham.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: MumInOhio on January 10, 2008, 10:16:53 AM
Lala's....I am unable to find that Satish made a statement on 6/16...do I need new glasses? I am back on page 36 of the last thread where you said he and Freddy were both questioned that day. Any help would be appreciated.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 10, 2008, 10:26:05 AM
Thank you CBB for my avatar....i love it....and Im so excited that Beth and Matt will be on Oprah....yes finally...Please, if you live in NY or Boston, come to the shows and be a voice for Natalee.They are VERY Important shows...We have donations for gas money or hotel rooms...or airline tickets..We have flyers, banners...cards...sweatshirts...and pens and tote bags..WE NEED PPL...please email me at JusticeforNatalee@gail.com.

Vicki, noticed a typo in your email address:

JusticeforNatalee@gmail.com


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: msmarple on January 10, 2008, 10:40:05 AM
Posted at RU  :roll: How many of these hangings had one hand in their pocket?

(http://img168.imageshack.us/img168/558/arubamurder2005jz1.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)
(http://img145.imageshack.us/img145/2038/suicidearuba2005ue1.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)


OBS - will you post this in the M&C thread? thank you.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 10, 2008, 11:14:57 AM
3 out of 4 wouldn't be a bad guess  :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 10, 2008, 11:17:46 AM
10.17.2005
Government has its hand over Michael Posner’s head? Notorious Chicago figure active in Aruba casino
DIARIO Aruba



ORANJESTAD (AAN): Some time ago DIARIO found information regarding the manager of the Holiday Inn’s Excelsior Casino and people have been calling out to ask how a figure with a criminal past of such an extent can be active in the casino industry of Aruba.

His name? Michael Posner, owner (or one of the owners) of the Brickel Hotel situated in front of the big hotels in Malmok. In the past he was arrested in the state of Illinois for violation of the Ricco Act (racketeering) and because he was also involved in the world of prostitution.

He was condemned to 10 years in prison, but apparently he served 8 out of the 10 years. He appealed his case and lost the appeal! After he was released he was on parole for 5 years. His name is also mentioned as an associate of a notorious family.

DIARIO knows that the government is at the height of such people, and asks how he can be active in the casino industry of Aruba. How did he find a permit to work in this branch with the background that he has? How has the Minister of Justice still not taken action against him? Now that his criminal past is known, what is the government waiting for to take him out of Aruba?

During the [election] campaign which recently came to an end, many comments and rumours were circulating regarding contributions to certain politicians, including those in the [current] government. DIARIO hopes that the issue of campaign moneys remain a rumour, because if true, then there are more politicians for sale than is [already] apparent.

The presence of Michael Posner in the Aruba casino industry, with the criminal past that he has, does not speak well of the judicial control system, nor that of National Security, nor of those in charge to check the background of those who work in the tourism industry of Aruba.

This is the damage that one person with such a bad reputation, who was incarcerated during 8 years, who is associated with a notorious family in America, can cause to the tourism of Aruba.
http://tinyurl.com/2mslqw

Dear Mister Jossy,

You must be mistaken. Why Michael Posner is no different then Karin Janssen who rushed in and arrested the Security Guards based upon the three lying witnesses who became suspects for the past 3 years and have gotten
away with a crime because people like the Aruban and/or DUTCH Prosecutors intentionally mis-use your justice system to help criminals.

Judges like BRINK AND SMID AND WITT all intentionally and willfully allowed criminals to be set free. Representatives
of your country went on national media and repeatedly stated evidence must be presented in order to detain the suspects yet the ONLY EVIDENCE presented by Prosecutor Karin Janssen to detain the Security Guards was the lying statements by the kidnappers and murders of Natalee Holloway.

Now, when you can explain that to the American public and the world, then perhaps we would be concerned that
an American mobster & felon has been running your casinos in Aruba. Otherwise it appears that the joke is in Aruba
where criminals run free.


yours truly,

kermit




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 10, 2008, 11:20:11 AM

Kawish reminds me a bit like Deepak with that stare  :shock:

I was thinking the same thing.  I was wondering what they were looking at that caused that. :shock:
:shock: lol
(http://img81.imageshack.us/img81/8184/kawishtw8.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)



EXORCISTS - BOTH OF EM!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 10, 2008, 11:21:22 AM
I don't know how it seems to other people, but Beth IS NOT profiting from Natalee's death, and people who think so are simply not aware of her plan, or at least my perception of her plan. She was quoted early on as promising the powers to be in Aruba that she would be the voice of Natalee seeking justice for her until her last breath on earth. Seeking justice for Natalee was to become her new career. In order to do that she began a foundation that allowed her to speak out to large audiences while earning a living doing it, thus "endowing the message" to ensure Natalee's words are heard until justice was found. Writing a book enabled her to further speak out for Natalee in print, memorializing the words of Natalee and the deeds of the guilty for eternity, while once again funding an endowment that will assure her of the ability to live her life speaking out for justice for Natalee.

In order to do this she took a huge risk. She left a very good career working with children, and at the age of, I better withhold that, and while grieving for the loss of her daughter, she embarked on a career of public speaking and book writing even though she had no prior experience or education in either field. This is even more remarkable considering that she had another child due to begin college in a couple of years at that time. Even facing a divorce and life as the sole provider for her and her son she kept loyal to her promise. She never looked back, and never doubted she could be self supporting allowing her to do what she promised Aruba she was going to do, speak out for justice for Natalee, full time, until she breathed her last breath.

I would say she did all of this on her own, but it is obvious to the world she did this with the strength and love of people like you all who cared enough to get involved and help her speak out. I believe despite the loss, which has surely been great, she feels to a certain degree blessed to have your support.

This is just my thinking, I don't give a hoot'n nanny about money or money Beth may or may not make/earn/get.
Aruba is responsible for cover-ing up a crime committed against her daughter. A girl who was only 18 years old did not deserve to die. And those responsible all the way up the chain of command - need to be exposed and held accountable. The world will not tolerate anything less. Beth deserves the truth. And she deserves to have her daughter brought home - to AMERICA!



I hate to repeat myself, but AMEN seems the only appropriate response. She is simply keeping her word!!!!!!!!!!!!

and AMEN again, and ribbit too!

I hope Oprah will show the news conference of Beth after the K2 release,

"Two suspects were released yesterday who were involved in a violent crime against my daughter.  I am asking mothers and fathers in all nations to hear my plea.  Do not allow the Kalpoe brothers to enter your country until this case is solved.  Do not allow these criminals to walk among your citizens.  Help me by not allowing these two to get away with this crime, in the name of my beautiful daughter whom I have not seen in thirty-six days and for whom I will continue to search until I find her."

Beth quotes her words from that day in her book on pages 156-157, and although reading it brought the tears all over again for me, it was because I heard her words that day on national television and felt her pain.  Did the Aruban people feel her pain that day?  Beth reflects in her book that many Arubans were offended by her using the term "criminals" in her speech which led to fewer prayer vigils, protesters against the negative media, her being unwelcome at the Holiday Inn, and the forming of the Strategic Communications Task force to combat the negative media, and the family as Beth states.  My perception of the reaction is that Beth hit a nerve.  She had just told the world what this "dirty little island" had full intentions of doing and every mother and father on that island knew it.  They all knew that even though the K2 could go anywhere they chose to, they would stay right there and never be prosecuted for their crime.  The citizens knew how the crime against Natalee had been covered up and that all involved would "walk freely among their citizens" because none of them would dare do anything about it.  Beth had in essence called all of them "criminals" because their silence that protects the dirty secrets involves all of them in the crime. It was easier to try to run Beth and family off of the island and hope that the world would forget about what happened to Natalee than to do the right thing.  JMO

Good idea - email it to her producers.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 10, 2008, 11:45:15 AM

Kawish reminds me a bit like Deepak with that stare  :shock:

I was thinking the same thing.  I was wondering what they were looking at that caused that. :shock:
:shock: lol
(http://img81.imageshack.us/img81/8184/kawishtw8.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)



EXORCISTS - BOTH OF EM!



I think he thinks that he looks "hot" like that, or sexy,etc. Somebody should be kind enough to tell him he looks like an angry mentally +++++++ teenage boy with that pose. Or a pencil d**** teenage wimp or punk, take his pick:)))))))))))) How he manages to look angry and blank at the same time though is pretty impressive!!!!!!!! And he could be a fairly attractive young man if he lightened up and smiled. I don't think they see any role models of happy well adjusted boys or young men there to emulate. Aruba reminds me of "Lord of the Flies" only in this case the males have so dominated the culture that the same fate has befallen them as did the fate of the shipwrecked boys.

There is no telling what other poses that photographer managed to talk him and his friends into participating while telling them that they have that "special look." Aruba is rampant with predators preying on innocent prey, and the poor local boys are transformed from innocent stooges into predators themselves as a result, or at least wannabe predators. The incompetence and impotence of her predators.

The young US girls who go there should acquaint themselves with Glenda to understand what they may become if they mix with the locals. Renhoes and sloots, and sorry to boot.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 10, 2008, 11:50:51 AM
The "boys" (who are actually men) are only a result of the pattern of behavior that their parents taught them.
Look to the parents first!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 10, 2008, 11:52:07 AM
The "boys" (who are actually men) are only a result of the pattern of behavior that their parents taught them.
Look to the parents first!


(http://www.foxnews.com/images/168436/0_22_350_sloots.jpg)

SOMETHING IS VERY WRONG WITH THESE PEOPLE

(http://img91.imageshack.us/img91/9573/pauluszipperdowntg6.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 10, 2008, 11:53:02 AM
Have a good one Monkey's and spread the love connection.

I'm off to eat some flies.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Peaches on January 10, 2008, 11:55:33 AM
I think perhaps Michael Dompig should have thought about his career choices before getting that huge, ugly tatoo on his arm.  Gonna be hard to get a job with that one.  Who is going to want you to advertise their product with that gangsta looking running up your arm?  Nobody. 

This Kawish kid doesn't look intense, he looks mentally ill.

These boys both need to pick a new dream. 

We have plenty of nice looking young men.  Don't need 'em.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Maggie on January 10, 2008, 11:56:03 AM
Pleeeeeeze stop posting their pictures...makes me want to gag...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: msmarple on January 10, 2008, 11:57:37 AM
Jose Trump missing since November 27th 2007
Thats a huge reward!!  :shock: :shock:
25,000,000 Aruban Florin = 14,124,294 US Dollars
14 million dollars? WOW! Is that right?
(http://img185.imageshack.us/img185/2054/tromprewarduh3.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)


OBS - Will you also post this on the M&C thread? Thanks.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 10, 2008, 12:05:36 PM
The "boys" (who are actually men) are only a result of the pattern of behavior that their parents taught them.
Look to the parents first!


(http://www.foxnews.com/images/168436/0_22_350_sloots.jpg)

SOMETHING IS VERY WRONG WITH THESE PEOPLE

(http://img91.imageshack.us/img91/9573/pauluszipperdowntg6.jpg)



That last photo is just a little to close to the "Lord of the Flies" but if he doesn't zip it up his open fly is going to surely attract flies:)))))))))


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Mere on January 10, 2008, 12:10:09 PM
Oprah's web site mentions the show with Beth and Matt....next Wednesday, the 16th

http://www2.oprah.com/tows/pastshows/200801/tows_lineup_20080109.jhtml?promocode=HP32


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: jackb on January 10, 2008, 12:31:29 PM
Posted at RU  :roll: How many of these hangings had one hand in their pocket?

(http://img168.imageshack.us/img168/558/arubamurder2005jz1.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)
(http://img145.imageshack.us/img145/2038/suicidearuba2005ue1.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)


I wonder who the murder victim was on May 31, 2005?

05/31/2005 – Rastaman “C.E.M.” fatally stabbed another man (victim Juni Tromp) on the beach.
Diario
Posted 8/19/2006 at M&C by Sharon; credit to dkpen & BLEACHEDBLACK. Also by Appeals 8/29


The stats read it was a female age 36 killed with a knife on 5-51-05 at 11:45 pm in St. Nicholas.  Wonder who and if that is the real age?  Jack B


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Peaches on January 10, 2008, 12:36:41 PM
Seems like a lot of suicides given the population.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: jackb on January 10, 2008, 12:40:05 PM
Posted at RU  :roll: How many of these hangings had one hand in their pocket?

(http://img168.imageshack.us/img168/558/arubamurder2005jz1.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)
(http://img145.imageshack.us/img145/2038/suicidearuba2005ue1.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)


I wonder who the murder victim was on May 31, 2005?

05/31/2005 – Rastaman “C.E.M.” fatally stabbed another man (victim Juni Tromp) on the beach.
Diario
Posted 8/19/2006 at M&C by Sharon; credit to dkpen & BLEACHEDBLACK. Also by Appeals 8/29

  modified mine.  Jb



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: MumInOhio on January 10, 2008, 12:45:24 PM
Posted at RU  :roll: How many of these hangings had one hand in their pocket?

(http://img168.imageshack.us/img168/558/arubamurder2005jz1.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)
(http://img145.imageshack.us/img145/2038/suicidearuba2005ue1.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)


I wonder who the murder victim was on May 31, 2005?

05/31/2005 – Rastaman “C.E.M.” fatally stabbed another man (victim Juni Tromp) on the beach.
Diario
Posted 8/19/2006 at M&C by Sharon; credit to dkpen & BLEACHEDBLACK. Also by Appeals 8/29


The stats read it was a female age 36 killed with a knife on 5-51-05 at 11:45 pm in St. Nicholas.  Wonder who and if that is the real age?  Jack B


Good catch!  And a knife was stolen from the fisherman's huts!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: msmarple on January 10, 2008, 12:51:13 PM
Posted at RU  :roll: How many of these hangings had one hand in their pocket?

(http://img168.imageshack.us/img168/558/arubamurder2005jz1.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)
(http://img145.imageshack.us/img145/2038/suicidearuba2005ue1.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)


I wonder who the murder victim was on May 31, 2005?

05/31/2005 – Rastaman “C.E.M.” fatally stabbed another man (victim Juni Tromp) on the beach.
Diario
Posted 8/19/2006 at M&C by Sharon; credit to dkpen & BLEACHEDBLACK. Also by Appeals 8/29


The stats read it was a female age 36 killed with a knife on 5-51-05 at 11:45 pm in St. Nicholas.  Wonder who and if that is the real age?  Jack B


Good catch!  And a knife was stolen from the fisherman's huts!

Y'all are confusing the dates.

"31-05-05" = 05/31/2005 = Male, age 44, knife (Juni Tromp)

"31-10-05" = 10/31/2005 = Female, age 36, knife (probably also on M&C thread summary)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: jackb on January 10, 2008, 12:56:02 PM

Kawish reminds me a bit like Deepak with that stare  :shock:

I was thinking the same thing.  I was wondering what they were looking at that caused that. :shock:
:shock: lol
(http://img81.imageshack.us/img81/8184/kawishtw8.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)



EXORCISTS - BOTH OF EM!



I think he thinks that he looks "hot" like that, or sexy,etc. Somebody should be kind enough to tell him he looks like an angry mentally +++++++ teenage boy with that pose. Or a pencil d**** teenage wimp or punk, take his pick:)))))))))))) How he manages to look angry and blank at the same time though is pretty impressive!!!!!!!! And he could be a fairly attractive young man if he lightened up and smiled. I don't think they see any role models of happy well adjusted boys or young men there to emulate. Aruba reminds me of "Lord of the Flies" only in this case the males have so dominated the culture that the same fate has befallen them as did the fate of the shipwrecked boys.

There is no telling what other poses that photographer managed to talk him and his friends into participating while telling them that they have that "special look." Aruba is rampant with predators preying on innocent prey, and the poor local boys are transformed from innocent stooges into predators themselves as a result, or at least wannabe predators. The incompetence and impotence of her predators.

The young US girls who go there should acquaint themselves with Glenda to understand what they may become if they mix with the locals. Renhoes and sloots, and sorry to boot.

They both appear of mid-Eastern decent.  The Suriname people are rooted from the Mideast.     Jack


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: MumInOhio on January 10, 2008, 12:57:51 PM
LOL...now I'm totally confused!! Will come back and read later when I can concentrate!

Thanks Msmaple...I was raised with the dates the other way around and still have to stop and think.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: msmarple on January 10, 2008, 01:05:45 PM
http://news.diario-aruba.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=blogcategory&id=13&Itemid=30&limit=9&limitstart=9 (http://news.diario-aruba.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=blogcategory&id=13&Itemid=30&limit=9&limitstart=9)   01/10/2008
Link is to Diario’s Local section

Family offering 25 thousand guilders for information leading to whereabouts of Jose Manuel Vincenzo Tromp, last seen 11/27/2007 at 8:30 a.m

Quote
Famia tromp a pone 25 mil disponible pa e tip di oro       
Thursday, 10 January 2008 

ORANJESTAD.(AAN): Manera a keda publica den un forma di exclusividad cu lo bay anuncia un balente suma di recompensa pa haya tip.

Ayera mainta na Palacio di Husticia situa na Santa Cruz a worde teni un conferencia di prensa relaciona cu desaparicion di Jose Manuel Vicenzo Tromp. Tabata presenta miembronan di famia den persona di tata, mama y ruman homber di Vicenzo.

Tambe halto Inspectornan Candelaria y Vanessa Kock tabata presente na e ocasion aki ya cu nan tambe ta forma parti di team special encarga pa e buskeda di Vicenzo.

Por a constata presencia tambe di vocero di Ministerio Publico señora Ann Angela. Tabata e vocero policial suplente Sr. John Larmonie cu a habri e conferencia di prensa pa haci un yamado en especial relaciona cu e caso di Vicenzo.

Despues di un yamada y un splicacion corto palabra a worde pasa pa fiscal Sra. mr Dop Kruimel.
El a bisa cu e meta principal pa cual nan a yama un rueda di prensa tabata pa haci un yamada na e comunidad Arubano pa yuda localiza Jose Manuel Vicenzo Tromp.

Ultimo biaha, segun fiscal a duna di conoce, a wak Vicenzo riba 27 di November2007 ora el a bandona su cas ubica na Weststraat 29 pa 8:30 di mainta. E tabata tin bisti e momento ey un carson cortico blauw scur te na rudia, T-shirt shinishi manga cortico y slof preto.

Fotonan di Vicenzo ya a worde publica pero tog fiscal kier a describi e persona aki. Vicenzo su color di cuero ta bruin clam, su estatura ta 1,80 meter. Pa locual ta su cabey esaki tambe ta manera ta worde describi ariba e foto, pero e por ta un poco mas cortico of mas largo na e momentonan aki.
E fiscal a trece dilanti e pakico Vicenzo ta worde busca y tambe e famia.

A base di e responsabilidad aki Ministerio Publico a forma un team special consisti di mas o menos 12 persona.

Ora cu ta necesario tur e 12 personanan aki por traha hunto riba e caso y nan ta trahando tambe pa tur informe cu a drenta na e momentonan aki pa verifica nan, pero nan mester di mas informe.
Vicenzo pa basta tempo caba a disparce, no sa exactamente kico ta pasando y no ta bay den direccion pa pensa di un crimen, pero lamentablemente no por exclui esaki pasobra e tin basta tempo cu el a desaparece.

Tur informe ta priva ya cu e meta ta pa hendenan duna cualkier informacion con chikito esaki lo por ta manera kico nan a mira pa asina por continua cu e investigacion.

E famia a relata cu Vicenzo Tromp tabata traha na KIA como guardia, e ta studia fuera su trabao na Avond VVO como studiante di prome aña, y den su tempo liber e ta studia na Biblioteca Oranjestad.
Por ta lo por tin persona cu lo a mire ayanan y a nota algo particular.

E ta gusta hopi pa landa na Arashi, tambe e ta gusta tennis, e ta un bon hungador, e tabata afila na e Tennis Club Champions, el a bay hasta Merca pa sigui un curso pa Academico di Tennis. Aki tambe lo por tin persona cu lo por suministra mas informe. Cada informe ta pa yuda pa e team special soluciona e caso di Vicenzo Tromp.

Diferente buskeda a ser realiza y e famia a ricibi ayudo, entre di Cruz Cora. Tabata tin buskeda a tuma lugar na diferente lugar riba nos isla, tanto den mondi y pafor di mondi. Pero no tabata tin resultado.

Ta haci un suplica na comunidad, na personanan pa yama telefon di polis na 582-4000. Esaki ta e number di warda di polis Playa y por pidi pa extension 134, 135 of 136.

Tin personanan di e team special cu sa di e caso pa atende e yamadanan. Pero si tin persona cu kier keda anonimo nan por yama na e asina yama tip-line 1114. ta preferible pa haya informenan caminda cu tin chens di combersa cu e personanan cu ta suministra informacion relaciona cu e buskeda di Vicenzo.

Finalmente segun fiscal Dop Kruimel a bisa, cu riba nan mes iniciativa e famia a pone e suma di 25 mil Florin disponible como recompensa.

E placa ta disponible pa e informacion cu ta conduci pa por haya Vicenzo Tromp.

Online Pap translation:

family tromp owing to place 25 thousand disponible for her tip of gold
thursday, 10 january 2008

oranjestad.(aan): as owing to stay publica in one form of exclusividad cu will bay anuncia one balente suma of recompensa for achieve tip.

yesterday morning at palace of husticia situa at santa cruz owing to worde teni one conferencia of prensa relaciona cu desaparicion of jose manuel vicenzo tromp. was present miembronan of family in person of father, mother y brother man of vicenzo.

also high inspectornan candelaria y vanessa kock was present at the ocasion here already cu they also is form part of team special encarga for her buskeda of vicenzo.

can owing to constata presencia also of vocero of ministerio publico madam ann angela. was the vocero policial suplente sr. john larmonie cu owing to open the conferencia of prensa for haci one yamado provided that especial relaciona cu the caso of vicenzo.

after of one call y one splicacion corto word owing to worde happen for fiscal sra. mr dop kruimel.
past owing to tell cu the aim principal for cual they owing to calling one rueda of prensa was for haci one call at the comunidad aruban for help localiza jose manuel vicenzo tromp.

ultimo trip, according fiscal owing to give of conoce, owing to look at vicenzo on 27 of november2007 hour past owing to bandona his cas ubica at weststraat 29 for 8:30 of morning. the was have dress the instant ey one carson cortico blauw dark till at knee, t-shirt grey sleeve cortico y slof black. f

otonan of vicenzo already owing to worde publica but tog fiscal wanted owing to describi the person here. vicenzo his color of cuero is bruin clam, his estatura is 1,80 metre. for locual is his cabey this also is as is worde describi upstairs the photograph, but the can is one some more cortico or more largo at the momentonan here.
the fiscal owing to trece fast the pakico vicenzo is worde busca y also the family.

owing to base of the responsabilidad here ministerio publico owing to form one team special consisti of more or less 12 person.

hour cu is necesario all the 12 personanan here can work together on the caso y they're trahando also for all informe cu owing to enter at the momentonan here for verifica they, but they have to of more informe.
vicenzo for enough time end owing to disparce, not know exactly kico is pasando y do not bay in direccion for think of one crimen, but alas not can exclui this because the have enough time cu past owing to desaparece.

all informe is priva already cu the aim is for hendenan give cualkier informacion con diminutive this will can is as kico they owing to see for so can continua cu the investigacion.

the family owing to relata cu vicenzo tromp was work at kia because; guardia, the is study fuera his trabao at avond vvo because; student of first year, y in his time pound the is study at biblioteca oranjestad.

can is will can have person cu will owing to mire ayanan y owing to notice algo particular.

the likes much for swim at arashi, also the likes tennis, the is one good hungador, the was afila at the tennis club champions, past owing to bay even merca for follow one curso for academico of tennis. here also will can have person cu will can suministra more informe. cada informe is for help for her team special soluciona the caso of vicenzo tromp.

various buskeda owing to being realiza y the family owing to ricibi aid, among of cruz cora. was have buskeda did take lugar at various lugar on we island, tanto in forest y abroad of forest. but not was have result.

is haci one suplica at comunidad, at personanan for calling telephone of police at 582-4000. this is the number of keep of police beach y can ask for extension 134, 135 or 136.

have personanan of the team special cu know of the caso for atende the yamadanan. but if have person cu wanted stay anonimo they can calling at the so calling tip-line 1114. is preferible for achieve informenan caminda cu have chens of combersa cu the personanan cu is suministra informacion relaciona cu the buskeda of vicenzo.

finalmente according fiscal dop kruimel owing to tell, cu on they self iniciativa the family owing to place the suma of 25 thousand guilder disponible because; recompensa.

the coin is disponible for her informacion cu is conduci for can achieve vicenzo tromp.

* * *
Two thieves (from "Toys 4 Us" ?) quickly captured.

Quote
Autoridad a capta dos sospechoso di ladronicia       
Thursday, 10 January 2008 

ORANJESTAD (AAN): Un caso insolito a socede Diaranzon mainta den Wilhelminastraat, net ora cu un accidente a pasa den area dilanti Toys 4 Us.  Hendenan a mira con dos persona anti-social a probecha di e situacion di emergencia aki, pa horta un tas bay cune.

Na careda nan a bay pariba, pasa den e rooi patras di NV Elmar. Aki nan a habri e tas, reboltea esaki y keda loke tin di balor. E tas mes nan a laga cay eybao.

Autoridad a worde avisa, y mesora nan a start cu un buskeda den e area.

Polis a bay den vecindario di Veld di Cricket, y a sigui bay pariba pa e area di Chollerhouse den Rondweg.

Aki nan a dal den suerte! Net patras di e hardware store den Rondweg, a bin nota e dos anti-social cu ta cuadra cu e descripcion duna.

Polisnan a yega for di tur skina, y a captura nan dos! Pues den menos di 15 minuut, dos ladron a worde captura.

Nan a hasta resisti contra nan detencion, y fotografo di DIARIO mes a mira con uno di nan a zwaai un scop den direccion di Polis. Pero e agentenan a mantene nan mes calmo, y a djis hala un banda.

Nan a keda deteni, pa asina Recherche start un investigacion y determina te con leu cada uno ta envolvi den e caso aki.

Online Pap translation:

autoridad owing to capta two sospechoso of ladronicia
thursday, 10 january 2008

oranjestad (aan): one caso insolito owing to socede diaranzon morning in wilhelminastraat, just hour cu one accidente owing to happen in area fast toys 4 us. hendenan owing to see con two person anti-social owing to probecha of the situation of emergencia here, for steal one bag bay cune.

at careda they owing to bay east, happen in the rooi behind nv elmar. here they owing to open the bag, reboltea this y stay thing have of value. the bag self they owing to let cay eybao.

autoridad owing to worde avisa, y at once they owing to start cu one buskeda in the area.

police owing to bay in vecindario of veld of cricket, y owing to follow bay east for her area of chollerhouse in rondweg.

here they owing to strike in suerte! just behind the hardware store in rondweg, owing to come notice the two anti-social cu is cuadra cu the descripcion give.

polisnan owing to arrive for of all angle, y owing to captura they two! then in less of 15 minuut, two thief owing to worde captura.

they owing to even resisti contra they detencion, y fotografo of daily paper self owing to see con uno of they owing to zwaai one scop in direccion of police. but the agentenan owing to mantene they self calmo, y owing to immidiately wing one near.

they owing to stay deteni, for so recherche start one investigacion y determina till con far cada uno is envolvi in the caso here.

* * *
Armed driver of car at Palace (Place?) of Justice. Doesn't seem to indicate whether he was caught. Apparently a case (cases) involving 10 +/- drug suspects was about to begin.

Quote
Nan a mira un homber cu arma den man!.
Alerta rond di corte di husticia
       
Thursday, 10 January 2008 

ORANJESTAD (AAN): Diaranzon mainta, oficialnan di Polis como tambe Recherche a bay den alerta maximo, specialmente den area rond di Palacio di Husticia.

Tur esaki a cuminza, ora cu un funcionario publico pa casualidad a mira un auto staciona banda di Alameda, y e chofer tin un arma di candela den su poder.

Inmediatamente a bati alarma na autoridad, y esaki inmediatamente a bay den alerta.

Algun oficial hudicial cu tabata presente na Corte ta cuida algun detenido, a bay den extra cautela, si acaso tin “cualkier cos”.

Diferente patruya di Polis a mobiliza pa e area pa asina check si nan ta haya e auto.

DIARIO a mira con oficialnan di Recherche y Team Bijzondere Projecten ta vigila.

Personal di CEA tambe a worde mira ta cana pafor di e edificio, cu nan man cla poni riba nan arma.
Sinembargo ya caba e auto cu e chofer a bandona e area caba.

Autoridad sinembargo ta keda riba alerta den e area aki, mirando e hecho cu den Corte tabatin mas di 10 persona kendenan a worde presenta dilanti Huez pa casonan relaciona cu Droga.

Online Pap translation:

they owing to see one man cu arm in hand!.
alerta rond of corte of husticia

thursday, 10 january 2008

oranjestad (aan): diaranzon morning, oficialnan of police because; also recherche owing to bay in alerta maximo, specialmente in area rond of palace of husticia.

all this owing to cuminza, hour cu one funcionario publico for casualidad owing to see one car staciona near of alameda, y the chofer have one arm of candela in his power.

at once owing to beat alarma at autoridad, y this at once owing to bay in alerta.

some oficial hudicial cu was present at corte is cuida some detenido, owing to bay in extra cautela, if acaso have “cualkier cos”.

various patrol of police owing to mobiliza for her area for so check if they're achieve the car.

daily paper owing to see con oficialnan of recherche y team bijzondere projecten is vigila.

personal of cea also owing to worde see is march abroad of the edificio, cu they hand cla poni on they arm.
sinembargo already end the car cu the chofer owing to bandona the area end.

autoridad sinembargo is stay on alerta in the area here, mirando the mature cu in corte had more of 10 person kendenan owing to worde present fast huez for casonan relaciona cu drugs.

* * *


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Observer on January 10, 2008, 02:00:51 PM
Seems like a lot of suicides given the population.



That was just in 2005,That didn't include the Tele-Aruba Producer,The Camera-Man with one hand in his pocket,The other guy with one hand in his pocket,Pitbull or any of the future suicides we read about.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Observer on January 10, 2008, 02:02:46 PM

Family offering 25 thousand guilders

Ahh..Ok that sounds more like a reward. 25 Million was hard to believe  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tylergal on January 10, 2008, 02:09:56 PM

  I think that those kind of looks are supposed to be intimidating to us
******* ,  when I worked in corrections  we would see those new type of young prisoners come in thru intake and they would be all bid and Bold until some of the older hard core cons would have a midnight talk with them and then when they would come back out with tears all over there faces  most of the others knew what had just happened and the young man would soon learn that in prison looks don't intimidate quite a few of those men .
  I would give almost anything to see Joran the gallops and Paulis inside of a real Prison in the USA  and show just how brave they really are  .  My bet would that they would be stripped of everything that they brought in with them and then become girl friends for the lifers and others  and yes even Joran,  being big in size in prison does not mean being respected, that you have to earn  and when a group grabs you in a small room there is NOT really a lot you can do except use your head or $$, cigs,  dope ect if you can obtain it .




Kawish reminds me a bit like Deepak with that stare  :shock:

I was thinking the same thing.  I was wondering what they were looking at that caused that. :shock:
:shock: lol
(http://img81.imageshack.us/img81/8184/kawishtw8.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)



Has that look of a terrorist.  They think it's cool to look like they are terrorizing people, but they are and it's not cool.  What weak men when they only terrorize children (Joran's brothers) and women (Natalee, et al).


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: msmarple on January 10, 2008, 02:28:08 PM
Apologies for not crediting the post brought over from RU - the quote stack was quite an obstacle.

(http://img168.imageshack.us/img168/558/arubamurder2005jz1.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)
(http://img145.imageshack.us/img145/2038/suicidearuba2005ue1.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)

Comparison of the RU Murders and Suicides for 2005, with our count.

Murders - 2005

* * *

This must be the 03/27/2005 murder reported in RU’s post. Age 34, Male, gunshot.

03/??/2005 - Brazilian man murdered by another Brazilian man. BonDia? No details available now.
Posted 8/16/2006 at LCD by Shizaru; to M&C via msmarple

* * *

Omitted by RU post:
04/30/2005 - Fatal shooting (victim “E.F.”) during a party near hotel La Cabana.
Amigoe.com
Posted 8/20/2006 at M&C by msmarple

* * *

This is the 05/31/2005 murder reported in the RU post.

05/31/2005 – Rastaman “C.E.M.” fatally stabbed another man (victim Juni Tromp) on the beach.
Diario
Posted 8/19/2006 at M&C by Sharon; credit to dkpen & BLEACHEDBLACK. Also by Appeals 8/29

* * *

05/31/2005 – Without apology - we include Natalee Holloway in our count of victims murdered on Aruba in 2005.

* * *

This is the 06/17 murder reported in RU post. He was found the next day.

06/18/2005 – Rene Michel van Heyningen found at a cemetery; partially decapitated; wife was charged, convicted.
Posted 8/10/2006 at M&C by Anna; credit to SunFreak2

* * *

Omitted from RU post, and we did not include this in the Murder count for 2005

06/20/2005 – Body found on a boat. No further details available now.

* * *

This must be the “10/31/2005” murder RU’s post reports. The dates are off, and the age is one year off, but these could be typos from whatever source.

11/04/2005 - Margarita Nedd-Panaqua, 35, from Dominican Republic. Stabbed by a jealous boyfriend.
Posted 8/10/2006 at M&C by Anna; credit to SunFreak2

* * *
This must the be the “11/01/2005” murder RU’s post reports. The dates are off, and the age is one year off, but these could be typos from whatever source.

11/04/2005 - Galyson Lucas Winster, a 27 year old, reportedly a drug addict, shot in the head.
Posted 8/10/2006 at M&C by Anna; credit to SunFreak2

*  * *

Finally – we do not have the “12/12/2005” murder RU reports, of a 36 year old male, by car.  (Wonder if Ramm would argue with RU about that one. He would know what I’m talking about.  :wink:)

Will have to edit that  one in some day; would bring OUR murder count for 2005 to 8.

* * *

Suicides

We did not post many suicides in the earlier months of the M&C thread.

These are the only two posts we have re. suicides, or possible suicide, on Aruba in 2005. (All of those mentioned by ******* are in 2006 or later, and we do have those.)

Interesting that those we do have, don’t seem to match well to any of those in the RU post - No "jumpings" or 30-year-old women, as examples.


* * *

Summer 2005 – Two security guards jumped off building (separate episodes). La Cabana Hotel was the site of one (maybe both) of them. That there are two instances, same occupation, maybe same building, make this suspicious.

There were at least two other reported suicides that summer – one “on the beach”, one “30-yr-old woman”.
Posted 8/16/2006 at M&C by Tidycat; and 8/29/2006 by Appeals

* * *

This is interesting. RU post does not seem to include Robert Wayne Benson as either a murder or a suicide. We did not include his death as a murder.

The closest match in the RU post seems to be "11/10/2005 - 46 - Male - Poison"


11/16/2005 - Robert Wayne Benson, 56 year old American expat, a Harley Davidson mechanic, found dead, locked in a storage container behind the shop in Cura Cabay where he worked. (Have read that it was a suicide and natural cause – but it’s the locked container that that seems strange. Have read that it was locked on the inside, and also that it was locked on the outside.) Diario
Posted 8/10/2006 at M&C by Anna; credit to SunFreak2

* * *




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 10, 2008, 02:30:07 PM
Lala's....I am unable to find that Satish made a statement on 6/16...do I need new glasses? I am back on page 36 of the last thread where you said he and Freddy were both questioned that day. Any help would be appreciated.


After looking at my post I think I meant to type Sander instead of Satish.  I had noticed the next day 6/17 that Satish was interrogated again, but I meant Sander.  I was talking about Sander at the time...sorry.  I got my names mixed up.  That's what I get for being in a hurry.  You don't need new glasses....I do.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 10, 2008, 03:02:05 PM
The "boys" (who are actually men) are only a result of the pattern of behavior that their parents taught them.
Look to the parents first!


(http://www.foxnews.com/images/168436/0_22_350_sloots.jpg)

SOMETHING IS VERY WRONG WITH THESE PEOPLE

(http://img91.imageshack.us/img91/9573/pauluszipperdowntg6.jpg)



That last photo is just a little to close to the "Lord of the Flies" but if he doesn't zip it up his open fly is going to surely attract flies:)))))))))

Hope I don't eat one of his flies.

Heh Heh



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Observer on January 10, 2008, 03:07:56 PM
 X. Persistence

Update: Thurs 10-Jan 1635 hrs
The bathymetric survey of the new grid is completed. -update will come shortly


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 10, 2008, 03:13:00 PM
Have a good one Monkey's and spread the love connection.

I'm off to eat some flies.


Kermit ... Miss Piggy gave me your mother's shoe-fly pie recipe and ... it is in the over right now.  Hop right over ... it's lunchtime in my next of the woods.

Ribbit

Janet
12:10 PM


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 10, 2008, 03:17:43 PM
Have a good one Monkey's and spread the love connection.

I'm off to eat some flies.


Kermit ... Miss Piggy gave me your mother's shoe-fly pie recipe and ... it is in the over right now.  Hop right over ... it's lunchtime in my next of the woods.

Ribbit

Janet
12:10 PM

Yum. Do I need to bring anything?



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 10, 2008, 03:24:22 PM
It was Deepak and Sander that were questioned on 6/16/05.

Juan Enrique BOEZEN and Shaniro Baldrik KELLY
SATISH 6/09/2005 STATEMENT
SATISH 06/10/2005 STATEMENT
SATISH 06/10/2005 2nd STATEMENT ON THAT DATE


DEEPAK 6/09/2005 STATEMENT
DEEPAK 06/10/2005 STATEMENT
DEEPAK 06/13/2005 STATEMENT
DEEPAK - 6/16/2005 STATEMENT

Shaniro Baldrik KELLY and Clyde Anthony BURKE
SANDER GOTTENBOS - 06/16/2005 STATEMENT
CARLOS RAMOS (gardener witness) Statements 7/26 - 8/16/2005
SANDER GOTTENBOS - 06/16/2005 STATEMENT
SANDER GOTTENBOS - 06/17/2005 STATEMENT




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 10, 2008, 03:24:26 PM
Have a good one Monkey's and spread the love connection.

I'm off to eat some flies.


Mr. Kermit...that would be The Rainbow Connection and you sing it
so beautifully.  It is one of my favorites.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 10, 2008, 03:26:51 PM
Have a good one Monkey's and spread the love connection.

I'm off to eat some flies.


Mr. Kermit...that would be The Rainbow Connection and you sing it
so beautifully.  It is one of my favorites.

(http://img221.imageshack.us/img221/6639/kermitbanjosl5.jpg)
Miss Magnolia you make me blush.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 10, 2008, 03:33:47 PM
It was Deepak and Sander that were questioned on 6/16/05.

Juan Enrique BOEZEN and Shaniro Baldrik KELLY
SATISH 6/09/2005 STATEMENT
SATISH 06/10/2005 STATEMENT
SATISH 06/10/2005 2nd STATEMENT ON THAT DATE


DEEPAK 6/09/2005 STATEMENT
DEEPAK 06/10/2005 STATEMENT
DEEPAK 06/13/2005 STATEMENT
DEEPAK - 6/16/2005 STATEMENT

Shaniro Baldrik KELLY and Clyde Anthony BURKE
SANDER GOTTENBOS - 06/16/2005 STATEMENT
CARLOS RAMOS (gardener witness) Statements 7/26 - 8/16/2005
SANDER GOTTENBOS - 06/16/2005 STATEMENT
SANDER GOTTENBOS - 06/17/2005 STATEMENT




Shaniro Baldrik KELLY and Clyde Anthony BURKE, respectively sergeant and sergeant first class with the Korps Politie Aruba and both detached to the Detective district 2, d - DEEPAK - 6/16/2005 STATEMENT


Dennis Dominico Jacobs, Juan Enrique Boezem and Luigi Angelo Giovanni Croes, respectively head agents and agent first class at the Korps police force Aruba, former classified at the assaulted project team and others at the Recherde district 2 - JORAN/SATISH FACE TO FACE MEETING 06/16/2005



Shaniro Baldrik KELLY and Clyde Anthony BURKE - SANDER GOTTENBOS - 06/16/2005 STATEMENT



DISTRICT 2 = SHABA
Roland Tromp
Jose Anthony
Elio Dania
Carina Boekhoudt
Edwin Thijsen





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: NM on January 10, 2008, 04:57:41 PM
This is the look kow-squash was going for.

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/nmauimikee/zoolander.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: crazybabyborg on January 10, 2008, 05:24:53 PM
The "boys" (who are actually men) are only a result of the pattern of behavior that their parents taught them.
Look to the parents first!


(http://www.foxnews.com/images/168436/0_22_350_sloots.jpg)

SOMETHING IS VERY WRONG WITH THESE PEOPLE

(http://img91.imageshack.us/img91/9573/pauluszipperdowntg6.jpg)



That last photo is just a little to close to the "Lord of the Flies" but if he doesn't zip it up his open fly is going to surely attract flies:)))))))))

Hope I don't eat one of his flies.

Heh Heh



Well, I've never said anything, but there's something really wierd about Anita's bra. I mean she's got pads in it...................there is no part of Anita that requires padding; she's got plenty of her own making.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: WhiskeyGirl on January 10, 2008, 05:51:10 PM
Anyone case related?

newsday.com/news/local/wire/newjersey/ny-bc-nj--heroinbust0110jan10,0,6476827.story
Quote
Newsday.com
Authorities seize 8 kilograms of heroin worth more than $500K
4:16 PM EST, January 10, 2008

SEACAUCUS, N.J.
(snip)
State Police Lt. Mark Kelly said Ramona Rodriguez-Tejada, 49, was arrested Wednesday as she attempted to board a bus in Secaucus. He says the powdered heroin she allegedly possessed is worth an estimated $520,000 and likely was smuggled through Aruba.
(snip)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 10, 2008, 05:59:04 PM
Anyone case related?

newsday.com/news/local/wire/newjersey/ny-bc-nj--heroinbust0110jan10,0,6476827.story
Quote
Newsday.com
Authorities seize 8 kilograms of heroin worth more than $500K
4:16 PM EST, January 10, 2008

SEACAUCUS, N.J.
(snip)
State Police Lt. Mark Kelly said Ramona Rodriguez-Tejada, 49, was arrested Wednesday as she attempted to board a bus in Secaucus. He says the powdered heroin she allegedly possessed is worth an estimated $520,000 and likely was smuggled through Aruba.
(snip)


We should check to see if there's anyone MIA from RU  :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: WhiskeyGirl on January 10, 2008, 06:04:56 PM
Aruba and the Netherlands get tough on drugs -

http://www.refdag.nl/artikel/1328734/Drugscontrole+door+werkgever+terecht.html

Quote
Mag een werkgever een werknemer testen op de aanwezigheid van alcohol of drugs in het lichaam? Welke gevolgen kan hij verbinden aan een positieve uitslag?

Voor werkgevers zijn dit relevante vragen, omdat alcohol en drugs het functioneren van de werknemer negatief kunnen beïnvloeden en kunnen leiden tot een verkeerd imago van het bedrijf.

De Hoge Raad heeft recent, eind vorig jaar, een baanbrekend arrest gewezen over de vraag in hoeverre een werkgever bevoegd is tot het geven van ontslag op staande voet als in het lichaam van een werknemer cocaïne is aangetroffen. De casus was als volgt.

Een dame, werkzaam als serveerster in een hotelcasino van Hyatt op Aruba, onderging een drugstest in het kader van het door de werkgever gevoerde antidrugsbeleid. De uitslag was positief. De werkneemster werd op staande voet ontslagen toen zij weigerde deel te nemen aan een rehabilitatieprogramma.

Het Gerecht van Eerste Aanleg en het gemeenschappelijke hof van justitie op Aruba hebben het ontslag geldig bevonden. De Hoge Raad liet dit oordeel in stand. Het argument van de werkneemster dat zij de verdovende middelen in privétijd (weekend) had gebruikt, werd niet valide bevonden.
(snip)
Ik deel deze opvatting niet. Het is duidelijk dat werkgever Hyatt het van groot belang acht dat werknemers clean zijn en discussie over de vraag waar het omslagpunt ten aanzien van de invloed van illegale drugs op het functioneren zou kunnen liggen uit de weg heeft willen gaan. Een dergelijk stringent beleid voorkomt willekeur. Daarbij moet niet uit het oog worden verloren dat het om illegaal drugsgebruik gaat. Het beoefenen van een illegale activiteit in privétijd verdient, ook vanuit het perspectief van privacyrechten, weinig (tot geen) bescherming.


Rough translation through babelfish ~
Quote
Can an employer test an employee on the presence of alcohol or drugs in the body? Which impact can he link to a positive result?

For employers is this relevant ask, because the functioning of the employee negatively can alcohol and drugs influence and can lead to found oneself an image of the company.

The Supreme Court have given judgement recent, end previous year, innovative concerning the question to what extent an employer is competent to giving dismissal on staande foot if it has been found in the body of an employee cocaine. The casus was as follows.

A lady, operative as a waitress in a hotel casino of Hyatt on Aruba, underwent a drug test within the framework of the antidrugsbeleid conducted by the employer. The result was positive. The salary-earner was dismissed staande foot then they refused take part in a rehabilitation programme.

The Court of first construction and the common Court of Justice on Aruba has validly been the dismissal. The Supreme Court left this judgement in score. The argument of the salary-earner who she had used the narcotic substances in privétijd (eekend), valide were not been.
(snip)
I do not share this conception. It is clear that employer Hyatt considers it be very important that employees clean and discussion concerning the question where the break-even point with respect to the influence of illegal drugs on the functioning lie would be possible from the way has wanted go. Such a tight policy prevents willekeur. Thereby does not have be lost sight of that it concerns illegal drug use. Practising an illegal activity in privétijd deserves, also from the perspective of privacy rights, little (to none) protection.

I wonder how frequent the testing is? 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: WhiskeyGirl on January 10, 2008, 06:16:16 PM
OMG!  :shock:

Has anyone looked at the Diario today?  They post the online at http://news.diario-aruba.com/

There is a little picture of what the print edition looks like ~

(http://news.diario-aruba.com//images/stories/2008N/januari/10/front.jpg)

It looks like a big garbage dump is on fire.  I hope they aren't blaming this on TES.  It's like a repeat of a few years ago.  :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 10, 2008, 06:23:10 PM
Anyone case related?

newsday.com/news/local/wire/newjersey/ny-bc-nj--heroinbust0110jan10,0,6476827.story
Quote
Newsday.com
Authorities seize 8 kilograms of heroin worth more than $500K
4:16 PM EST, January 10, 2008

SEACAUCUS, N.J.
(snip)
State Police Lt. Mark Kelly said Ramona Rodriguez-Tejada, 49, was arrested Wednesday as she attempted to board a bus in Secaucus. He says the powdered heroin she allegedly possessed is worth an estimated $520,000 and likely was smuggled through Aruba.
(snip)


The funny thing about this story is that she was riding a bus to move
half a million dollars worth of Heroin.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: WhiskeyGirl on January 10, 2008, 06:23:41 PM
Anyone case related?

newsday.com/news/local/wire/newjersey/ny-bc-nj--heroinbust0110jan10,0,6476827.story
Quote
Newsday.com
Authorities seize 8 kilograms of heroin worth more than $500K
4:16 PM EST, January 10, 2008

SEACAUCUS, N.J.
(snip)
State Police Lt. Mark Kelly said Ramona Rodriguez-Tejada, 49, was arrested Wednesday as she attempted to board a bus in Secaucus. He says the powdered heroin she allegedly possessed is worth an estimated $520,000 and likely was smuggled through Aruba.
(snip)


We should check to see if there's anyone MIA from RU  :lol:

There have been suggestions that many have been banned from RU recently.  However, this does not mean by any stretch of the imagination or speculation, that they are 'missing'.  They may have run away.  Prior to running away, they many have said bad things.  My opinion, of course. 

Maybe the climate is changing and it's ok to say people are missing in Aruba.  I don't know.   :gaah:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: JusticeforNatalee on January 10, 2008, 08:31:47 PM
In response to questions about Travel Show info:
2 VERY IMPORTANT TRAVEL SHOWS COMING UP!

Boston is first

http://www.bostonglobetravelshow.com/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: JusticeforNatalee on January 10, 2008, 08:36:55 PM
NY is next:
http://www.nyttravelshow.com/

Okay, all you New Englanders and New Yorkers.
Don’t be shy. Natalee needs you. The group going needs you.

Bostonians and New Yorkers need to be reminded of the injustice done to Natalee.

Tourists need to be educated.

Boston and NY are major events.

Come and help out. Hold a sign. Hand out flyers and giveaways.
If you can only help for a day or a few hours, still volunteer.

Ask anyone who has attended these shows–you will feel so good about the way you helped Natalee.

So whatever it takes to get there, please try.
If you have to share rides, etc. to get there, just do it.
Where there is a will, there is a way.

Look on Yahoo: Last year I found an inexpensive flight for only $50 each way.

Please contact Vicki: JusticeforNatalee@gmail.com
if you want to attend or help in any way.

ALL HELP IS GREATLY APPRECIATED.

Thank you and peace to all of you.
 :smt052 :smt052 :smt052 :smt052


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: JusticeforNatalee on January 10, 2008, 08:42:32 PM
 T-shirts and sweatshirts bearing Natalee's image have been donated for
all supporters attending the shows. The sweatshirts are very warm.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Observer on January 10, 2008, 08:44:52 PM
Very sad what happened to that Bulgarian tourist and it was probably a accident. I noticed after I posted the picture of the cuts and dried blood on his feet Imageshack took down the picture. If there is a Forensic Pathologist reading here please view the pics on the FP. Sorry if I offended anyone,I just don't trust anything Aruba has to say and for good reason. I have seen two recent hangings where both men had there hand in one pocket,a american locked in a storage bin,a tele-aruba producer and her camera man both hung within weeks and Pitbull who's head was bashed in,body parts cut off and set on fire. All ruled suicides and this was just a fraction of the suspicious deaths the last 3 years.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 10, 2008, 08:45:51 PM
I just read something that was actually true at RU.
Paulus would be no good at cards because he would
start to sweat and everyone would know what he had.
 :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Observer on January 10, 2008, 09:52:26 PM
I just read something that was actually true at RU.
Paulus would be no good at cards because he would
start to sweat and everyone would know what he had.
 :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Heh..Well we know he sucks at lying! Well they both do  :wink:

PVDS says in his PV he played a free Carribean Stud Tournament that Joran took over. Joran says it was a Texas Hold EM Tournament. Amazing that they couldn't even get that lie correct. Joran says he won like $150(300 Florin?) which he gave$100 to his dad for taking his seat,Apparently it was too much money for the big gamblers so PVDS had to go to the bank the next day to deposit it  :roll: Didnt Joran lose like $150 that night in BJ? $5 Minumum hands in BJ will catch up to ya quickly when losing :wink: PVDS the next day was urgently trying to deposit this little bit of money that Joran allegedly won is laughable. Joran by his own admission was losing or winning a couple hundred a night.

We also saw a PV of Jorans friend who lended him money because Joran didn't have any after the tournament. PVDS says he leaves at 18:30 to go home but appears to be on film at 20:14. Joran is playing BJ at 20:14 so when did he take his fathers place in this tournament if he was playing BJ? In his statements he says he played the tournament until 22:00. You cannot be playing BJ and playing at another table at the same time. Surely it would have taken him hours at least 3 more to reach a final table and finish in 4th place. Why so many lies about what took place in the casino? What was Paul's real reason for going to the bank?

When I was a kid I could always tell when my brother was lying. About the 10th time asking him if he was lying his nostrils would move a bit :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: robots on January 10, 2008, 10:00:40 PM
the bank story was a LOAD OF CRAP  :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 10, 2008, 10:16:26 PM
the bank story was a LOAD OF CRAP  :cool:

So...why was it so important to account for the time at the bank
or to invent a reason to go to the bank?
Joran said several times that he kept cash at his room.
Paulus picked Joran up at school at 12:30 and they went to
the police station.  What did they do then?

I get confused when you use BJ for Black Jack, ******* :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Observer on January 10, 2008, 10:29:18 PM
Your right Robots,It's all a load of crap!! :wink: I see Joran tells PVDS he won $150 U.S. but Sanders says $350 U.S. Now how much did Joran say he won in his PV?

150.00 USD = 223 guilders
150.00 USD = 270 Florin

(6-18 PV)Joran had told me he had won third place, he said he had won 150$ and had exchanged these into Aruban Florin.

(6-23 PV)At the bank I talked to Ruth DIJKHOFF. At the bank I deposited the
money that Joran said that he had won in the “Free Tournament
in
the Holiday Inn” on the 29th of May 2005. It was approximately
500 Aruban guilders. Joran had given me 100 guilders because he
had taken over my place in the tournament.

(PVDS 6-18)I immediately called him with my wife's mobile phone and he answered me that he was at the Wyndham. Where was Anita's phone on May 30th-June 1st and what calls were made?

What call's were made on Anitas phone and where from on 5-30 to 6-1-05?



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Observer on January 10, 2008, 10:37:45 PM
the bank story was a LOAD OF CRAP  :cool:

So...why was it so important to account for the time at the bank
or to invent a reason to go to the bank?
Joran said several times that he kept cash at his room.
Paulus picked Joran up at school at 12:30 and they went to
the police station.  What did they do then?

I get confused when you use BJ for Black Jack, ******* :lol:

Something awful fishy about what happened at the Casino and why he said he went to the bank. I guess we can't talk to Ruth Dijkhoff because she's dead  :shock: :-? Obviously if PVDS was at the bank it was to make a large transaction or to get access to the video camera tape. Still not quite sure why they are lying so much about the casino and the bank.

Sorry to confuse you  :lol: Sometimes my posts are way to wordy  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 10, 2008, 10:45:14 PM
I just started a thread at Oprah's message board about the show next week...yes, the wingnuts will be out in full force, but I felt I should do something.

Justice for Natalee Holloway
Jan 10, 2008 9:34 PM 2njsons
1 posts since
Jan 10, 2008
 I'm glad to see you will have Beth Holloway and her son, Matt, on your show next week. The case needs to be heard and seen on the networks and it's finally going to be on yours. There are many who have supported the family from the outset, which will be 3 long years this May.

Justice for Natalee


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: texasmom on January 10, 2008, 10:47:00 PM
*******,
I may have missed something.  Did PVDS visit the ATM twice in the early morning hours of 5/30 or was that misinformation? 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 10, 2008, 10:50:08 PM
Your right Robots,It's all a load of crap!! :wink: I see Joran tells PVDS he won $150 U.S. but Sanders says $350 U.S. Now how much did Joran say he won in his PV?

150.00 USD = 223 guilders
150.00 USD = 270 Florin

(6-18 PV)Joran had told me he had won third place, he said he had won 150$ and had exchanged these into Aruban Florin.

(6-23 PV)At the bank I talked to Ruth DIJKHOFF. At the bank I deposited the
money that Joran said that he had won in the “Free Tournament
in
the Holiday Inn” on the 29th of May 2005. It was approximately
500 Aruban guilders. Joran had given me 100 guilders because he
had taken over my place in the tournament.

(PVDS 6-18)I immediately called him with my wife's mobile phone and he answered me that he was at the Wyndham. Where was Anita's phone on May 30th-June 1st and what calls were made?

What call's were made on Anitas phone and where from on 5-30 to 6-1-05?



I figure that Anita had Paulus' phone with her in NL....his had the International
calling and hers didn't.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Observer on January 10, 2008, 10:53:02 PM
*******,
I may have missed something.  Did PVDS visit the ATM twice in the early morning hours of 5/30 or was that misinformation? 

That is one of the first rumors that we heard about all of this. I have never seen anything official if it was fact or fiction. My gut tell's me it is true and he was seen in that red jeep at 4AM. Probably was at a ATM near a Mcdonalds.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 10, 2008, 11:06:18 PM
*******,
I may have missed something.  Did PVDS visit the ATM twice in the early morning hours of 5/30 or was that misinformation? 

That is one of the first rumors that we heard about all of this. I have never seen anything official if it was fact or fiction. My gut tell's me it is true and he was seen in that red jeep at 4AM. Probably was at a ATM near a Mcdonalds.

4. PAULUS ATM USED THE NIGHT NATALEE DISAPPEARED: (Tito Lacle is a reporter for Fox News, who lives in Aruba and he posted at scared monkeys answering questions as Iam Tito)

ATMS
IamTito
Joined: 10 Aug 2005
Location: aruba
PostPosted: Thu Aug 11, 2005 2:56 pm    Post subject: more answers    Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote
Mishy.. activity on ATMS have not been revealed.. its limited though



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 10, 2008, 11:06:59 PM
the bank story was a LOAD OF CRAP  :cool:

Digicel is next door to the CMB bank.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 10, 2008, 11:08:15 PM
I just read something that was actually true at RU.
Paulus would be no good at cards because he would
start to sweat and everyone would know what he had.
 :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

I believe he already showed us what he had
heh heh


(http://img91.imageshack.us/img91/9573/pauluszipperdowntg6.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: mrs. red on January 10, 2008, 11:13:10 PM
Dang Kermie....

I was all lurking and you just made me nauseous


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 10, 2008, 11:18:08 PM
Posted tonight at RU:

K Hemingway = Moonshadows (FOB) explains her position in the case  :wink:


(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/KhemMoon.jpg)

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/KhemMoon2.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Observer on January 10, 2008, 11:25:22 PM
We knew Moonshadows claimed to be Anita's friend but who is Chris Keating the other registered owner at FOB2? I see he is also originally from Michigan and lives in Florida  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: robots on January 10, 2008, 11:27:57 PM
as with everything a SLOOT does in their lives
there is an about 15 percent truth in everything they do


did paulus go to the bank?
probably

did he go to the bank to deposit money killer joran gave him
not a chance

maybe paulus went to the bank and maybe paulus MET someone in the bank parking lot


 :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 10, 2008, 11:28:01 PM
We knew Moonshadows claimed to be Anita's friend but who is Chris Keating the other registered owner at FOB2? I see he is also originally from Michigan and lives in Florida  :wink:

Yeah, we knew but I've never seen Moonshadows post it so clearly.  I don't know who Chris Keating is. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: robots on January 10, 2008, 11:30:22 PM
anita posts on some of these BOARDS

you know she does

 :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Observer on January 10, 2008, 11:36:11 PM
We knew Moonshadows claimed to be Anita's friend but who is Chris Keating the other registered owner at FOB2? I see he is also originally from Michigan and lives in Florida  :wink:

Yeah, we knew but I've never seen Moonshadows post it so clearly.  I don't know who Chris Keating is. 

He's a little weasel that runs FOB2 and won't admit why he runs a hate site about a victim and her family or why he supports the Van Der Sloots. Why don't you come out of hiding? At least Moonshadows admits why she is involved. Your a total coward Chris..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: texasmom on January 10, 2008, 11:38:04 PM
Dang Kermie....

I was all lurking and you just made me nauseous

me too!

there were posts earlier in the day with this pic and the one of Anita in her see thru blouse and talk of "Lord of the flies" that had me giggling so much I was afraid my boss would hear me....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 10, 2008, 11:39:26 PM
Would someone please take my hand and lead me to the casino video location?  Is it in the Important Case Documents? TIA


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Observer on January 10, 2008, 11:43:44 PM
 X. Persistence

Update: Thurs 11-Jan 0030 hrs
The bathymetric survey of the new grid is completed. The search area now totals approximately 57 sq miles, compared to the original 22 sq miles.

Maritime map making has long been an integral aspect of ocean exploration. As adventure seeking sea-faring men of old expanded their frontier, master artisans such as Ortelius and Cicero painstakingly plotted their progress. Instead of producing drab plots where form follows function, they used their artistry to produce meaningful navigation aids and passionately capture the spirit of exploration into their product. Areas of the yet-unknown are filled with caricatures of sea monsters and mermaids.

Today, a new generation of maritime map making, perhaps ushered in by Heezen and Tharpe, provides a new look into the abyss. Hand-painted murals with Latin place names are now replaced with computer generated 3D perspective views with satellite imagery. The old merchant ships and frigates that once sailed these waters charting coastlines and reefs claimed by the sea can now be found and mapped. It is an interesting connection between the old and new. We sail the same seas.

(http://img169.imageshack.us/img169/8831/aruba3ddq9.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 10, 2008, 11:51:20 PM
Do you think that is that North Western part of the island
near the Gottenbos house and where Deepak took a pee?
Looks like it to me.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on January 10, 2008, 11:52:52 PM
I just read something that was actually true at RU.
Paulus would be no good at cards because he would
start to sweat and everyone would know what he had.
 :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Now we know who is "Dirty Hand'"


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 10, 2008, 11:55:04 PM
as with everything a SLOOT does in their lives
there is an about 15 percent truth in everything they do


did paulus go to the bank?
probably

did he go to the bank to deposit money killer joran gave him
not a chance

maybe paulus went to the bank and maybe paulus MET someone in the bank parking lot


 :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool:

CHARLES CROES !!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 10, 2008, 11:59:20 PM
Do you think that is that North Western part of the island
near the Gottenbos house and where Deepak took a pee?
Looks like it to me.

Yes


(http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h291/SunFreak2/ArashiBeachMap2.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 11, 2008, 12:03:36 AM
Not positive, but the search area map posted on the Persistence blog appears to be in the area right where the words Arashi Beach are and then to the north of it.

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/ArashiBeachMap2.jpg)


(http://img169.imageshack.us/img169/8831/aruba3ddq9.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Observer on January 11, 2008, 12:04:08 AM
as with everything a SLOOT does in their lives
there is an about 15 percent truth in everything they do


did paulus go to the bank?
probably

did he go to the bank to deposit money killer joran gave him
not a chance

maybe paulus went to the bank and maybe paulus MET someone in the bank parking lot


 :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool:

CHARLES CROES !!!

Well if Natalee did get off a phone call on someones cell phone,logicly that would be the first person Paul Van Der Sloot went to visit. Well maybe the second after his buddy Jan Van Der Straaten. I know Charles owned the Fastphones rental at the Airport but no idea where he would have a office,probably at another location. It sure was at the top of his list of things to do was getting to that bank. He said he even went there twice.

I saw a few lotteries recently in Aruba for businesses. One of them was like $350 a ticket and say a 1000 tickets,the winning ticket gets the business. I aslo heard that Hiram's dad  is affiliated with these Lotteries in Aruba. Thats probably why Mr.Matthews was so angry when they robbed him of his business and when he didn't back down and keep his mouth shut he payed the price. Nobody ever wins vs the Aruban Govt. Their offers you cant refuse..The only people that they can't torture,kill,extort money from or blackmail is the Dutch Govt and right now Rudy Croes is boycotting them  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 11, 2008, 12:14:47 AM
Thanks Klaas for the comparisions.  It makes it easy to see.
I am glad to know they are there.  I feel that is the right spot.
I got a little nervous with Hodges talking about going out
from the Fisherman's Huts.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 11, 2008, 12:24:54 AM
Does Moonshadows live on Aruba?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: texasmom on January 11, 2008, 12:26:08 AM
as with everything a SLOOT does in their lives
there is an about 15 percent truth in everything they do


did paulus go to the bank?
probably

did he go to the bank to deposit money killer joran gave him
not a chance

maybe paulus went to the bank and maybe paulus MET someone in the bank parking lot


 :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool:

CHARLES CROES !!!

Well if Natalee did get off a phone call on someones cell phone,logicly that would be the first person Paul Van Der Sloot went to visit. Well maybe the second after his buddy Jan Van Der Straaten. I know Charles owned the Fastphones rental at the Airport but no idea where he would have a office,probably at another location. It sure was at the top of his list of things to do was getting to that bank. He said he even went there twice.


I agree, and PVDS probably had to make another trip to make sure CC accompanied the family when they arrived....I've heard that the VDS weren't rich and "got by", makes me wonder.   :-?  I would imagine that the payoffs would have been a LOT more than the little sporter won...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 11, 2008, 12:30:18 AM
Pretty Pups, Texasmom.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 11, 2008, 12:30:29 AM
Does Moonshadows live on Aruba?
No, she lives in Florida


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Observer on January 11, 2008, 12:32:25 AM
In this statement Joran said he lost and says nothing of making final table and placing 3rd or 4th. Neither him or Paul was playing in that tournament at 20.00 hours that I am sure of. None of this makes any sense and everything eventually was a lie. I think it was PVDS who cooked up the lie about winning money so he had a excuse to go to the bank. They are trying to make the timeline 2 hours later but they are caught on video at 20:14 playing BJ. He says he didn't play BJ until after 22:00..I believe Natalee was in the hotel getting ready for C&C at that time.

Joran 6/9 statement
At my father's request I sat in for him and played "Texas Hold'm poker. I am not sure as to when half time was but I think it was between 19.00 and 20.00 hours. I kept on gambling until I lost too. This was according to me until 21.30 to 22.00 hours.I went to walk around in the casino and after that went to the "Blackjack" table to play blackjack. While I was sitting at the table the girl "Natalee" that is missing now to the blackjack table together with her friends


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: texasmom on January 11, 2008, 12:33:03 AM
Pretty Pups, Texasmom.

thanks Magnolia!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on January 11, 2008, 12:36:50 AM
I just read something that was actually true at RU.
Paulus would be no good at cards because he would
start to sweat and everyone would know what he had.
 :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Now we know who is "Dirty Hand'"

Better make that "Slimy Hand."

Oh, no, I have an Aruban avatar--it disappears! :shock: :shock:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: texasmom on January 11, 2008, 12:38:48 AM
In this statement Joran said he lost and says nothing of making final table and placing 3rd or 4th. Neither him or Paul was playing in that tournament at 20.00 hours that I am sure of. None of this makes any sense and everything eventually was a lie. I think it was PVDS who cooked up the lie about winning money so he had a excuse to go to the bank. They are trying to make the timeline 2 hours later but they are caught on video at 20:14 playing BJ. He says he didn't play BJ until after 22:00..I believe Natalee was in the hotel getting ready for C&C at that time.

Joran 6/9 statement
At my father's request I sat in for him and played "Texas Hold'm poker. I am not sure as to when half time was but I think it was between 19.00 and 20.00 hours. I kept on gambling until I lost too. This was according to me until 21.30 to 22.00 hours.I went to walk around in the casino and after that went to the "Blackjack" table to play blackjack. While I was sitting at the table the girl "Natalee" that is missing now to the blackjack table together with her friends

good job *******!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Observer on January 11, 2008, 12:41:58 AM
Thx TM! I know all this has been gone through with a magnifying glass but just bothers me that none of there lies/statements add up. Not even the time before Natalee went missing :(


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: texasmom on January 11, 2008, 12:45:56 AM
I just read something that was actually true at RU.
Paulus would be no good at cards because he would
start to sweat and everyone would know what he had.
 :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Now we know who is "Dirty Hand'"

Better make that "Slimy Hand."

Oh, no, I have an Aruban avatar--it disappears! :shock: :shock:

LMAO!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: sirensong on January 11, 2008, 12:57:09 AM
Thx TM! I know all this has been gone through with a magnifying glass but just bothers me that none of there lies/statements add up. Not even the time before Natalee went missing :(

Yes, and that the Dutch nor the Arubans even bothered to get to the bottom of these lies.  And the judges didn't think all this lying was enough evidence to hold them.  Or that all this lying was obstucting justice.  And that Joran can put on his smug smile for the cameras after all this lying.   


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: texasmom on January 11, 2008, 12:58:22 AM
Thx TM! I know all this has been gone through with a magnifying glass but just bothers me that none of there lies/statements add up. Not even the time before Natalee went missing :(

People that lie as much as these people do DON'T KNOW HOW TO TELL THE TRUTH!
Plus they never had any fear of being accountable for their lies so they didn't care how many they told.  When and if they were ever confronted with inconsistencies, or couldn't remember WHAT they'd said, they could just choose to not answer since they'd already made a statement. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: oceanexploration on January 11, 2008, 12:59:17 AM
Yet another interesting night on board the Persistence.  If you wanted to know where the search grid was, why not just ask?  I'm suprised I have never been asked that question. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Observer on January 11, 2008, 01:01:59 AM
Yet another interesting night on board the Persistence.  If you wanted to know where the search grid was, why not just ask?  I'm suprised I have never been asked that question. 

You guys would make great explorers back in the 1400's and would rival with the best even the Vikings  :wink: I pray you go down in the history books on that kind of legendary status,finding Natalee would definetly be a unbelievable achievement.. Either way you guys are still heroes in our books for making the attempt..

Where yall searchin? Wheres the search grid?  :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 11, 2008, 01:04:20 AM
Yet another interesting night on board the Persistence.  If you wanted to know where the search grid was, why not just ask?  I'm suprised I have never been asked that question. 

OK, Ocean, I am asking.  I would also like to know the legend on the colors.
If you wouldn't mind.  We were worried about you when your internet was
down.  I would also like to know where TES searched before.
Thank you kindly.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: texasmom on January 11, 2008, 01:04:54 AM
Hi Oceanexploration!

So good to see you, hope everything is going your way out there!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Observer on January 11, 2008, 01:05:29 AM
Just reading old PV'S and the name Chato appeared(Leonardo)We havent heard to much about him have we? I wonder if his Ford PU is white?
Also i saw this in Satish statement on the 11th. Why was Paul sleeping in the main house?
The father of Joran at that moment was sleeping inside the house.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: oceanexploration on January 11, 2008, 01:09:16 AM
I don't like the phrasing of "going down" in history.  It implies sinking, and/or death - a sure way to enter the history books following achievement.  I plan on neither any time soon. By now I'm sure the RU-ites have done Google search comparisons and figured it out from the pic I posted.  It's a 5.5 x ~10 mile grid.  NW side of the island. Perhaps I should have included a scale bar on the fig..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: texasmom on January 11, 2008, 01:14:31 AM
YOU ARE OUR HEROES PERSISTENCE CREW!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: oceanexploration on January 11, 2008, 01:15:08 AM
Well back to work.  Goodnight all.  God bless.  Thanks for the prayers and words of encouragment. All the crew is sincerely thankful for the support. ~K


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 11, 2008, 01:15:13 AM
I don't like the phrasing of "going down" in history.  It implies sinking, and/or death - a sure way to enter the history books following achievement.  I plan on neither any time soon. By now I'm sure the RU-ites have done Google search comparisons and figured it out from the pic I posted.  It's a 5.5 x ~10 mile grid.  NW side of the island. Perhaps I should have included a scale bar on the fig..

RU has been busy fighting amongst themselves tonight and I don't think they noticed it yet  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 11, 2008, 01:15:51 AM
Ocean,
I have another question....right off of the brach on that
North Western tip down toward Arishi beach you can
see a very large rectangular object in the water and
the waves break over it.  It would nearly have to be
manmade due to the straight edges.  Do you know
what it is?
I see it on the global incident map.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 11, 2008, 01:15:51 AM
Well back to work.  Goodnight all.  God bless.  Thanks for the prayers and words of encouragment. All the crew is sincerely thankful for the support. ~K

Goodnight Kyle - thanks for all you and the rest of the crew are doing!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Observer on January 11, 2008, 01:19:43 AM
I don't like the phrasing of "going down" in history.  It implies sinking, and/or death - a sure way to enter the history books following achievement.  I plan on neither any time soon. By now I'm sure the RU-ites have done Google search comparisons and figured it out from the pic I posted.  It's a 5.5 x ~10 mile grid.  NW side of the island. Perhaps I should have included a scale bar on the fig..

Sorry, not the best choice of words  :cool: Naw..You guys are on a mission from Gawd as the Blues Brothers would say and I expect a safe voyage until everyone is safe back home..No one has ever searched the bottom of those seas like you have..Similar to the great explorers of the 15th and 16th centuries who sailed into the unknown and made history when they discovered the new world..Of Course the first Viking found the New World by accident :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 11, 2008, 01:21:44 AM
I read on the Marine Report earlier tonight that the seas
will be much calmer Friday and Saturday and then pick up
again on Sunday through Tuesday.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: texasmom on January 11, 2008, 01:26:59 AM

Thanks for the information, Kyle.

Goodnight and God Bless!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Observer on January 11, 2008, 01:27:38 AM
Well back to work.  Goodnight all.  God bless.  Thanks for the prayers and words of encouragment. All the crew is sincerely thankful for the support. ~K

Word's can't describe how thankfull we are!! Do you have any interesting targets to look at tommorow? Best of luck kyle! May tommorow be the day!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on January 11, 2008, 01:34:23 AM
You're right Aruba, I don't understand your justice system.

I don't understand a system that allows people to lie, unless someone utters the magic word and then they must tell the truth.
I don't understand why you are allowed to drink when you are underage.
I don't understand why you are allowed to gamble when you are underage.
I don't understand why a father connected to this system not only allows his son to do this, but goes drinking and gambling with him.
I don't understand how a man who has friends on the police department and is involved in the system would take so long to answer the door when those people come banging on this door late at night.

About parent-child relationships:
I don't understand why you run home and tell Mommy what kind of underwear someone you were making out with was wearing.
I don't understand why parents can't seem to dress themselves.
I don't understand how your mommy can think you are a sporter when your sport seems to be trying to score with women with or without their permission.
I don't understand how your mommy thinks if she was on the island none of this would have happened.  (Who wears the pants in this family--correctly I mean).  We know who wears the bra.
I don't know how you expect your son to keep his fly closed when you can't.

About your monetary system:
I don't understand how a boy witout a job can afford to go drinking so often.
I don't understand how a boy without a job can afford to buy drinks for other people.
I don't understand how a boy without a job can afford to go out gambling often.
I don't understand how a boy who needs to borrow money needs to make a deposit in the middle of the night.
I don't understand how a boy without a job can afford to pay someone to photoshop pictures.

About time in Aruba:
I don't understand why a grown man who is never without a watch can't tell if it is 11:00 PM or 4:00AM.  :2doh:

About the water currents:
I can't understand why the current spits some bodies out while it makes others disappear. 

About hospitality/sanitation:
I don't understand how you could spit in the food of anyone, let alone a grieving mother.

About morals:
I don't understand why a boy, who picked up a girl, took advantage of her believing she was intoxicated after he supplied her with alcohol at the end of the night, abused her while his friends were in the car,  left her alone on the beach, managed to make his shoes disappear, killed his own dog, framed two innocent men, admitted to lying to the police, and photoshopped pictures of a missing girl who has people grieving for her, can becomes a cult hero.   :-x

I don't understand, it must be the cowboy in me.  At least I know how to zipper my own pants.   :roll: :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: texasmom on January 11, 2008, 01:39:42 AM
GREAT POST, Bearlyhere.  I hope you told them all of that when you rescued your avatar!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Hotshot on January 11, 2008, 01:46:54 AM
Quote
MsMarple  
The closest match in the RU post seems to be "11/10/2005 - 46 - Male - Poison"

This indeed did happen and was posted in a paper.  Which one I can't remember now, but when we went to aruba that beach was pointed out to me as to "this is where the man drank poison".  And that was only 2 months later which is why I remember it so well.  Hope that helps.  I have no links.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on January 11, 2008, 01:52:43 AM
GREAT POST, Bearlyhere.  I hope you told them all of that when you rescued your avatar!

Thanks, texasmom.   The Klaasmeister swooped in and did her magic.

I know there are good people in Aruba and I don't mean them.  I mean people who add 2+2+2+2 and come up with zero.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on January 11, 2008, 01:55:01 AM
Thanks, Kyle, and thanks to all of those giving up a chunk of their lives to help.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: texasmom on January 11, 2008, 01:57:36 AM
GREAT POST, Bearlyhere.  I hope you told them all of that when you rescued your avatar!

Thanks, texasmom.   The Klaasmeister swooped in and did her magic.

I know there are good people in Aruba and I don't mean them.  I mean people who add 2+2+2+2 and come up with zero.

Exactly!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 11, 2008, 02:00:09 AM
Quote
MsMarple  
The closest match in the RU post seems to be "11/10/2005 - 46 - Male - Poison"

This indeed did happen and was posted in a paper.  Which one I can't remember now, but when we went to aruba that beach was pointed out to me as to "this is where the man drank poison".  And that was only 2 months later which is why I remember it so well.  Hope that helps.  I have no links.

This was the picture in the paper for that event:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/Copyofarubasuicide111105.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Hotshot on January 11, 2008, 02:01:54 AM
Quote
MsMarple  
The closest match in the RU post seems to be "11/10/2005 - 46 - Male - Poison"

This indeed did happen and was posted in a paper.  Which one I can't remember now, but when we went to aruba that beach was pointed out to me as to "this is where the man drank poison".  And that was only 2 months later which is why I remember it so well.  Hope that helps.  I have no links.

This was the picture in the paper for that event:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/Copyofarubasuicide111105.jpg)

Thanks so much Klaas.  Going to bed now.  Good night all.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 11, 2008, 02:03:19 AM
GOODNIGHT ALL!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: texasmom on January 11, 2008, 02:08:19 AM


Goodnight Klaasend!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Observer on January 11, 2008, 02:19:09 AM
Description: DNA comparison (between blood samples and Deepak Kalpoe's car seat samples)
Source: NFI
Lab nr: none
Location: Den Haag, Holland
---------------------------------
Strange there is no name attached to this report..On everything else there seems to be. Also I see nowhere where they looked into Anita's cell phone records. You would think that would be in the discoveries because PVDS says Joran was using it on May 31st,one day after Natalee went missing


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on January 11, 2008, 02:19:53 AM
Nite Klaas, Nite HS.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on January 11, 2008, 02:23:10 AM
Description: DNA comparison (between blood samples and Deepak Kalpoe's car seat samples)
Source: NFI
Lab nr: none
Location: Den Haag, Holland
---------------------------------
Strange there is no name attached to this report..On everything else there seems to be. Also I see nowhere where they looked into Anita's cell phone records. You would think that would be in the discoveries because PVDS says Joran was using it on May 31st,one day after Natalee went missing

There you go, trying to use logic again.  :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Observer on January 11, 2008, 02:24:42 AM
These two reports are very interesting  :wink:

Title: Subpoena on Sprint for tel nr: xxx subscriber: Paul Brough
Date: 08109/2005
Location: Miami, Florida
File #: 163a-bb-1426-571
Initiator: SA WILLIAM T. CLAUSS 2
-------------------------
Nameffitle/Description: Hayley Carroro Sagona
Date: 06/06/2005
Pages: 3
File #: 163a-bb-1426
Location: Jamaica, NY
Writer/Initiator: SA Gregory T. Mchugh

Name,Title/Description: Hayley Sagona (urine samples)
Date: 06/07/2005
Pages: 1
File #: 163a-bb-1426
Location: Huntington NY
Writer/Initiaton Nurse Marie 0' Brain


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Observer on January 11, 2008, 02:37:40 AM
Description: DNA comparison (between blood samples and Deepak Kalpoe's car seat samples)

There you go, trying to use logic again.  :roll:
I know it :( Maybee they didn't check Anita's cell phone records because Dompig wanted to give the phone it's privacy  :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Observer on January 11, 2008, 03:46:38 AM

Justice for Natalee Holloway: Lost in the 'War on Terror'?
English (US)  January 10th, 2008 (The Corner Report)

By Patrick Cloutier

On 30 May 2005, Natalee Holloway disappeared while vacationing on Aruba. As of 18 December 2007, Aruban authorities closed her case. From beginning to end, the island's authorities demonstrated no interest in solving her disappearance. Why didn't the US pressure Aruba to look more thoroughly into Natalee Holloway's disappearance? Some answers may lie with Big Oil and the 'Global War on Terror.'


At the time of Natalee Holloway's disappearance, the U.S. Government was pressing NATO countries for military contributions to the Global War on Terror. One of these countries was the Netherlands. Aruba belongs to the Netherlands.

The Netherlands did have 1,400 men in Iraq, but withdrew them all in March 2005. The withdrawal of the Dutch from Iraq came soon after Spain--another NATO member--withdrew its 1,300 troops. The withdrawal of two NATO countries from Iraq was publicly damaging to the American war effort. If the Netherlands could be convinced to send more troops to Afghanistan, the move from Iraq would look more like a transfer than a withdrawal.

However, it was public outcry against Dutch abuse of Iraqi detainees that forced The Hague to withdraw its soldiers from Iraq, and the public remained sensitive to deploying troops anywhere else.

Unlike Spain, the Dutch government could be pressured by economic interests to provide troops for Washington. Royal Dutch Shell, an oil company, wanted to exploit Iraqi oil. But the Dutch troop withdrawal from Iraq may have jeopardized Shell's standing with the Bush-Cheney team. Sending Dutch troops to Afghanistan, however, might help Shell regain favor with them.

Then came the disappearance of Natalee Holloway on Dutch Aruba.

The primary suspect in Miss Holloway's disappearance was a Dutch citizen, Joran van der Sloot. Worse was the fact that Joran's father, Paulus van der Sloot, was a Dutch judge-in-training, who appears to have used his legal training to help his son evade prosecution. The United States, whose tourists spend millions of dollars into the island economy, could have influenced local authorities to make a proper investigation, but did not. Why?

An American attempt to force an investigation of Natalee Holloway's disappearance might have embarrassed US efforts to get a Dutch troop commitment. Already angered by American conduct in Iraq, Dutch opinion might have reacted strongly against US efforts to strong-arm Aruba over Natalee Holloway. Increased anti-American sentiment may have forced Dutch legislators to vote against sending troops to Afghanistan.

Evidently, the US and the Netherlands wanted the Natalee Holloway case to go away. The US remained silent about the young woman's fate, and the Dutch allowed Aruba to sabotage the case. On 23 December 2005, Prime Minister Balkenende decided to deploy additional Dutch troops to Afghanistan; on 3 February 2006, The Hague approved his decision. The US got the Dutch troops it wanted, and Royal Dutch Shell got the Iraqi oil it wanted.

Justice for Natalee Holloway may have been a victim of the "Big Picture" in the Global War on Terror. Undeniably, Big Oil has a stake in that part of the war in Iraq, which claims to advance American values. Why is it that American values, such as blind justice, do not appear to apply for Miss Holloway's family? But this war has been governed by paradoxes: the current Administration (and probably the next one, too) tells America that in order to spread US values, torture warehouses are indispensible; an increase in American-controlled oil drives gas prices up, not down; and bringing civil liberties to strangers 8,000 miles away, necessitates abandoning justice for Americans wherever they may be: at home, abroad, or just off-shore.

Patrick Cloutier is a writer who lives in Hartford, CT. He be contacted at patrick_john_cloutier@yahoo.com.

http://tinyurl.com/39rw2q


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Observer on January 11, 2008, 03:55:30 AM
Amigoe.com, 20 julie 2005
Van der Straten sounded for police Bonaire(Translation)

Friday is the last working day of Commissioner Jan van der Straten. The Police confirmed that he was approached by the Antillean Justice Minister David Dick (PAR) to Bonaire to work. Or he addresses this request van der Straten not say. "I go to talk to him."

Van der Straten departs next week for a vacation to Ireland. Perhaps then the Commissioner of Police at the Bonaire are going to work.

Solving the Holloway case, Van der Straten, which until Friday still leads in this investigation, probably not. "Of course I prefer the matter resolved. The whole team had already resolved the better, I do not do it alone." According to Van der Straten take Roy Tromp Zoemers policeman and the leadership of the investigation. Van der Straten remain optimistic about solving the case of missing American. "I still assume that the matter is resolved."

http://bonaire.web-log.nl/bonaire/2005/07/van_der_straten.html




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Observer on January 11, 2008, 03:58:36 AM
Justice for Natalee Holloway
Oprah.com
Jan 10, 2008 9:34 PM
 2njsons 1 posts since
Jan 10, 2008
I'm glad to see you will have Beth Holloway and her son, Matt, on your show next week. The case needs to be heard and seen on the networks and it's finally going to be on yours. There are many who have supported the family from the outset, which will be 3 long years this May.

Justice for Natalee
 lsl1020
Jan 10, 2008
Reply 1. Re: Justice for Natalee Holloway Jan 10, 2008 10:21 PM
Thank you Oprah! Natalee Holloway's story needs to be told, and I am delighted that you are having her mother Beth and brother Matt on your show next week. I have followed the story from day one and as 2nj stated have supported Beth and Dave in their quest for answers. This is a story that every parent, and every American that plans to travel to that "happy little island" ?:| needs to know about.

I hope and pray that one day soon, there will be Justice for Natalee.

http://www.oprah.com/community/thread/13274


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: MumInOhio on January 11, 2008, 05:36:50 AM
Regarding the discussions on Charles Croes and Digicel, notice that Satish said Deepak told him that Steve Croes worked for Digicel, he thinks. I have some posts that say Satish and Steve knew each other, will have to find them. Posters found pictures of Satish on Steve tickle site.

I have been trying to track down some of the rumors on Steve from the day he was arrested, but am not having much luck. Digicel worker,EMT, pilot,DJ and from an influential family that owns a newspaper.

From Satish’s 6/10 PV

"I was informed of my rights. I am still going to stand by the statement I made as a witness at the police station in Bubali. I do remember now that my brother had told me. Last week Friday my brother told me that the man Steve had seen us when we dropped off Natalee Holloway that night at the Holiday Inn Hotel. My brother Deepak told me that Steve had said to him that he had seen us. I myself do not know Steve. My brother thinks that Steve works at Digicel. I don't personally know Steve. I have never seen Steve. According to my brother, Steve had told him that he had dropped off people at the Holiday Inn on Monday May 30th at approximately 01.45 hours. My brother has also told me that Steve was also in Carlos & Charlies that night

. According to me Steve had told my brother that he was dropping off tourists at the Holiday Inn Hotel that night. I did not ask my brother what kind of car Steve drives and he also did not tell me that. On May 29th 2005 we arrived at Carlos & Charlies between 23.30 hours and 23.45 hours. That night at Carlos & Charlies we each drank a "Yard". I only had a "Yard" that night in Carlos & Charlies. My brother also only had one "Yard". Joran had drunk a "Yard" and a "body shot". Joran also had a shot of another drink. I do not know what kind of drink that is. I saw that the girl Natalee also drank a shot of the drink together with Joran. We that night left Carlos & Charlies at approximately 01.15.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: MumInOhio on January 11, 2008, 07:43:54 AM
Good Morning OE and Pita


Pita...I am looking for info on Guido's Dad...do you have any? TIA


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 11, 2008, 08:45:47 AM
Quote
MsMarple  
The closest match in the RU post seems to be "11/10/2005 - 46 - Male - Poison"

This indeed did happen and was posted in a paper.  Which one I can't remember now, but when we went to aruba that beach was pointed out to me as to "this is where the man drank poison".  And that was only 2 months later which is why I remember it so well.  Hope that helps.  I have no links.

This was the picture in the paper for that event:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/Copyofarubasuicide111105.jpg)

Just how many people have you ever heard of who have committed suicide with poison? Extremely violent death, excruciating pain. Its not like drugs are hard to come by to overdose if you really want to end it. Next they will claim a beheading was a suicide.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Peaches on January 11, 2008, 09:02:59 AM
the bank story was a LOAD OF CRAP  :cool:

So...why was it so important to account for the time at the bank
or to invent a reason to go to the bank?
Joran said several times that he kept cash at his room.
Paulus picked Joran up at school at 12:30 and they went to
the police station.  What did they do then?

I get confused when you use BJ for Black Jack, ******* :lol:
[/b]

You're not the only one...... :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 11, 2008, 09:12:54 AM
Posted tonight at RU:

K Hemingway = Moonshadows (FOB) explains her position in the case  :wink:


(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/KhemMoon.jpg)

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/KhemMoon2.jpg)


Anita you are reaping what you have sown. You forced your son down this path, as he recanted in the back of the police car so plainly, a path of lies and deceit thus depriving himself of the chance for redemption and a opportunity to walk with the Lord. You reinforced that it is OK to do all of the sordid things that he did, and thus insured that he will continue doing them. Junior Sportster took your instruction as well, wanting to be the man that his dad and brother are. God help what your poor daughter must think of her importance in the world as it is plain to her that women are worthless as her male role models have shown her and spineless as you have so obviously demonstrated to her. Don't bother trying to explain this to your children because children listen to what adults do, not what they say, and your actions clearly describe your lack of morals.

Pity you, I don't, because it could have been different and can be different. Your family doesn't have to be destroyed by the cancer you have intentionally decided to not treat. You need to pray to God to grant you the strength to save your children. To be a mother who nurtures her children helping them achieve their potential, to be have happy childhoods, grow into strong adults, and to present you with happy well adjusted families and children. This is that moment for you, that pivotal moment in time, when the future generations of your family are going to be determined by your actions. The responsibility for generations to come depends squarely upon you, precisely at this moment in history. And it is so easy for you to ensure that those future days for your family are days that are blessedly happy if you remember one little sentence. You never do the wrong thing by doing the right thing. I know I am rooting for your family to have some bright days ahead, but it can only happen if you find your strength.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 11, 2008, 09:15:22 AM
Quote
MsMarple  
The closest match in the RU post seems to be "11/10/2005 - 46 - Male - Poison"

This indeed did happen and was posted in a paper.  Which one I can't remember now, but when we went to aruba that beach was pointed out to me as to "this is where the man drank poison".  And that was only 2 months later which is why I remember it so well.  Hope that helps.  I have no links.

This was the picture in the paper for that event:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/Copyofarubasuicide111105.jpg)

Just how many people have you ever heard of who have committed suicide with poison? Extremely violent death, excruciating pain. Its not like drugs are hard to come by to overdose if you really want to end it. Next they will claim a beheading was a suicide.

My great granddaddy committed suicide right on the town square in Montecello,
Arkansas...course he was 88 years old.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 11, 2008, 09:16:57 AM
forgot to say...he drank poison that he had just bought at the drugstore.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 11, 2008, 09:30:50 AM
We knew Moonshadows claimed to be Anita's friend but who is Chris Keating the other registered owner at FOB2? I see he is also originally from Michigan and lives in Florida  :wink:


I have posted this before and many of you are aware of this.
Moonshadows runs a business w/ Chris Keating in Indian Rocks Beach, FL
http://www.moonshadowsandrainforests.com/



http://www.indiebeauty.com/directory/listing.asp?by=sc&id=Florida
MoonShadows and RainForests

Owner: Christopher Keating
Member Since September 2007
Address: 501 20th Ave, Indian Rocks Beach,, FL 33785
Phone: (727) 517-1539
Fax:

MoonShadows and RainForests, Enchantingly Natural Candles, Bath and Body Products. Extraordinary Fragrance Lines! Exotic Florals, Forbidden Fruit, Designer Decadence Shades of Vanilla and Candles for Causes. Premium natural wax candles made from oils of soy, palm, and other botanicals. Matching bath and body products created from natural vegetable oils and butters all produced in the




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 11, 2008, 09:53:29 AM
forgot to say...he drank poison that he had just bought at the drugstore.


People are much kinder and gentler to themselves these days:) I am sure it happens, but not very often. Now days we save the poison for our enenies we want to suffer:)))))))) But I am sorry about your great grandfather. Even if he was 88 and guessing about the era in which he lived, he had a long life, I know it causes a family concern, regardless of the circumstances. Monticello is a nice town with a modern university with a lot of good people living there. Not to mention excellent deer and duck hunting, and crappie, brim, bass, and catfish fishing.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Buckeye on January 11, 2008, 09:59:34 AM
private eye said:

Junior Sportster took your instruction as well, wanting to be the man that his dad and brother are. God help what your poor daughter must think of her importance in the world as it is plain to her that women are worthless as her male role models have shown her and spineless as you have so obviously demonstrated to her


Does Anita have a daughter??  :2doh:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: NM on January 11, 2008, 10:04:14 AM
NY is next:
http://www.nyttravelshow.com/

Okay, all you New Englanders and New Yorkers.
Don’t be shy. Natalee needs you. The group going needs you.

Bostonians and New Yorkers need to be reminded of the injustice done to Natalee.

Tourists need to be educated.

Boston and NY are major events.

Come and help out. Hold a sign. Hand out flyers and giveaways.
If you can only help for a day or a few hours, still volunteer.

Ask anyone who has attended these shows–you will feel so good about the way you helped Natalee.

So whatever it takes to get there, please try.
If you have to share rides, etc. to get there, just do it.
Where there is a will, there is a way.

Look on Yahoo: Last year I found an inexpensive flight for only $50 each way.

Please contact Vicki: JusticeforNatalee@gmail.com
if you want to attend or help in any way.

ALL HELP IS GREATLY APPRECIATED.

Thank you and peace to all of you.
 :smt052 :smt052 :smt052 :smt052
Hey Monkeys and J4N,
If I can just chime in and say attending a travel show to be Natalee's voice is a wonderful experience. I was so surprised at the number of people who truly care about Natalee and her situation. These people were of every combination of age, gender and race. The privilege of representing Natalee and meeting Monkeys I will cherish forever in my heart.
Plus it is amazing to expirience all the hard work of both Monkeys and BFN behind the sceens.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 11, 2008, 10:12:42 AM
Do we know who this is? Is it a new name?

Name: Francisco Thiel  
Date:08 June 2005
Pages: 3
Writer/Initiator: Dennis Jacobs & Juan Boezem
Description: indication of an area  


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 11, 2008, 10:12:48 AM

Justice for Natalee Holloway: Lost in the 'War on Terror'?
English (US)  January 10th, 2008 (The Corner Report)

By Patrick Cloutier

On 30 May 2005, Natalee Holloway disappeared while vacationing on Aruba. As of 18 December 2007, Aruban authorities closed her case. From beginning to end, the island's authorities demonstrated no interest in solving her disappearance. Why didn't the US pressure Aruba to look more thoroughly into Natalee Holloway's disappearance? Some answers may lie with Big Oil and the 'Global War on Terror.'


At the time of Natalee Holloway's disappearance, the U.S. Government was pressing NATO countries for military contributions to the Global War on Terror. One of these countries was the Netherlands. Aruba belongs to the Netherlands.

The Netherlands did have 1,400 men in Iraq, but withdrew them all in March 2005. The withdrawal of the Dutch from Iraq came soon after Spain--another NATO member--withdrew its 1,300 troops. The withdrawal of two NATO countries from Iraq was publicly damaging to the American war effort. If the Netherlands could be convinced to send more troops to Afghanistan, the move from Iraq would look more like a transfer than a withdrawal.

However, it was public outcry against Dutch abuse of Iraqi detainees that forced The Hague to withdraw its soldiers from Iraq, and the public remained sensitive to deploying troops anywhere else.

Unlike Spain, the Dutch government could be pressured by economic interests to provide troops for Washington. Royal Dutch Shell, an oil company, wanted to exploit Iraqi oil. But the Dutch troop withdrawal from Iraq may have jeopardized Shell's standing with the Bush-Cheney team. Sending Dutch troops to Afghanistan, however, might help Shell regain favor with them.

Then came the disappearance of Natalee Holloway on Dutch Aruba.

The primary suspect in Miss Holloway's disappearance was a Dutch citizen, Joran van der Sloot. Worse was the fact that Joran's father, Paulus van der Sloot, was a Dutch judge-in-training, who appears to have used his legal training to help his son evade prosecution. The United States, whose tourists spend millions of dollars into the island economy, could have influenced local authorities to make a proper investigation, but did not. Why?

An American attempt to force an investigation of Natalee Holloway's disappearance might have embarrassed US efforts to get a Dutch troop commitment. Already angered by American conduct in Iraq, Dutch opinion might have reacted strongly against US efforts to strong-arm Aruba over Natalee Holloway. Increased anti-American sentiment may have forced Dutch legislators to vote against sending troops to Afghanistan.

Evidently, the US and the Netherlands wanted the Natalee Holloway case to go away. The US remained silent about the young woman's fate, and the Dutch allowed Aruba to sabotage the case. On 23 December 2005, Prime Minister Balkenende decided to deploy additional Dutch troops to Afghanistan; on 3 February 2006, The Hague approved his decision. The US got the Dutch troops it wanted, and Royal Dutch Shell got the Iraqi oil it wanted.

Justice for Natalee Holloway may have been a victim of the "Big Picture" in the Global War on Terror. Undeniably, Big Oil has a stake in that part of the war in Iraq, which claims to advance American values. Why is it that American values, such as blind justice, do not appear to apply for Miss Holloway's family? But this war has been governed by paradoxes: the current Administration (and probably the next one, too) tells America that in order to spread US values, torture warehouses are indispensible; an increase in American-controlled oil drives gas prices up, not down; and bringing civil liberties to strangers 8,000 miles away, necessitates abandoning justice for Americans wherever they may be: at home, abroad, or just off-shore.

Patrick Cloutier is a writer who lives in Hartford, CT. He be contacted at patrick_john_cloutier@yahoo.com.

http://tinyurl.com/39rw2q

Very interesting article, *******.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 11, 2008, 10:16:11 AM
Posted tonight at RU:

K Hemingway = Moonshadows (FOB) explains her position in the case  :wink:


(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/KhemMoon.jpg)

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/KhemMoon2.jpg)


Anita you are reaping what you have sown. You forced your son down this path, as he recanted in the back of the police car so plainly, a path of lies and deceit thus depriving himself of the chance for redemption and a opportunity to walk with the Lord. You reinforced that it is OK to do all of the sordid things that he did, and thus insured that he will continue doing them. Junior Sportster took your instruction as well, wanting to be the man that his dad and brother are. God help what your poor daughter must think of her importance in the world as it is plain to her that women are worthless as her male role models have shown her and spineless as you have so obviously demonstrated to her. Don't bother trying to explain this to your children because children listen to what adults do, not what they say, and your actions clearly describe your lack of morals.

Pity you, I don't, because it could have been different and can be different. Your family doesn't have to be destroyed by the cancer you have intentionally decided to not treat. You need to pray to God to grant you the strength to save your children. To be a mother who nurtures her children helping them achieve their potential, to be have happy childhoods, grow into strong adults, and to present you with happy well adjusted families and children. This is that moment for you, that pivotal moment in time, when the future generations of your family are going to be determined by your actions. The responsibility for generations to come depends squarely upon you, precisely at this moment in history. And it is so easy for you to ensure that those future days for your family are days that are blessedly happy if you remember one little sentence. You never do the wrong thing by doing the right thing. I know I am rooting for your family to have some bright days ahead, but it can only happen if you find your strength.

I do think I need to clarify something. I don't hold Anita responsible for the actions of her son involving the "something went wrong." Joran was a man/child at the time, young, immature but too old for Anita to watch 24/7, and like all of our children he did something stupid, he made a mistake, one with tragic consequences, and as a result it would be foolish for me to judge Anita responsible for the act, or for me to say that Anita chose for her son to do whatever it is that he did. My kids certainly aren't perfect, and none of their friends are, and sometimes they make dumb mistakes. Fortunately, so far their mistakes haven't had this tragic an outcome. But as kids do, even kids who completely ignore every word their parents utter, and defy every word of parental authority they have ever heard, when there is big trouble, they run to their parents seeking the wisdom and direction of their parents on what to do as a result.

It is the response and direction that Anita chose as a plan for Joran to cope with his mistake that I hold Anita responsible for. That is what I mean when I say she chose this path for him.  I think she did not know in the beginning exactly what happened, and she was innocent and truly a loving mother defending her child.

But she has now figured out what he did, she knows what her husband did, she knows of the deceit and she knows of the cover up that her husband has directed her son to follow. She knows that her husband is sorry as far as this type of action involves, probably guilty as well, and that only she is strong enough to step up to the plate to save her son by teaching him the virtue of owning up for his mistakes, accepting his responsibility, helping ease Beth's loss, and helping her son to move on from this and become a well adjusted adult. As a mother she also knows how impressionable her other children are, and she knows that they know as well what went down at the house that night.

But I am not saying she directed Joran down the path of causing the harm, directly. Children make mistakes. Adults help them learn from them, recover, and move on. And I stand corrected, I understand there is no daughter, which is fortunate. However, there are more sportsters, which is sad. However, who knows, Anita may yet feel her maternal callings and correct this, resulting in great things for Anita's family as well as Beth's family.

Anyway, Anita, all of our children make mistakes, all of us as parents make mistakes, and I certainly don't expect you to be perfect. I'm not. But it is time to correct the mistake, to expect consideration from Beth for correcting the mistake, and to help your son deal with whatever it is that went wrong that night so that he can have a happy life. Plus it is time to stop being so cruel to Beth. It seems to me that there are a lot of people depending on you Anita, please don't let them down.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 11, 2008, 10:19:39 AM

Justice for Natalee Holloway: Lost in the 'War on Terror'?
English (US)  January 10th, 2008 (The Corner Report)

By Patrick Cloutier

On 30 May 2005, Natalee Holloway disappeared while vacationing on Aruba. As of 18 December 2007, Aruban authorities closed her case. From beginning to end, the island's authorities demonstrated no interest in solving her disappearance. Why didn't the US pressure Aruba to look more thoroughly into Natalee Holloway's disappearance? Some answers may lie with Big Oil and the 'Global War on Terror.'


At the time of Natalee Holloway's disappearance, the U.S. Government was pressing NATO countries for military contributions to the Global War on Terror. One of these countries was the Netherlands. Aruba belongs to the Netherlands.

The Netherlands did have 1,400 men in Iraq, but withdrew them all in March 2005. The withdrawal of the Dutch from Iraq came soon after Spain--another NATO member--withdrew its 1,300 troops. The withdrawal of two NATO countries from Iraq was publicly damaging to the American war effort. If the Netherlands could be convinced to send more troops to Afghanistan, the move from Iraq would look more like a transfer than a withdrawal.

However, it was public outcry against Dutch abuse of Iraqi detainees that forced The Hague to withdraw its soldiers from Iraq, and the public remained sensitive to deploying troops anywhere else.

Unlike Spain, the Dutch government could be pressured by economic interests to provide troops for Washington. Royal Dutch Shell, an oil company, wanted to exploit Iraqi oil. But the Dutch troop withdrawal from Iraq may have jeopardized Shell's standing with the Bush-Cheney team. Sending Dutch troops to Afghanistan, however, might help Shell regain favor with them.

Then came the disappearance of Natalee Holloway on Dutch Aruba.

The primary suspect in Miss Holloway's disappearance was a Dutch citizen, Joran van der Sloot. Worse was the fact that Joran's father, Paulus van der Sloot, was a Dutch judge-in-training, who appears to have used his legal training to help his son evade prosecution. The United States, whose tourists spend millions of dollars into the island economy, could have influenced local authorities to make a proper investigation, but did not. Why?

An American attempt to force an investigation of Natalee Holloway's disappearance might have embarrassed US efforts to get a Dutch troop commitment. Already angered by American conduct in Iraq, Dutch opinion might have reacted strongly against US efforts to strong-arm Aruba over Natalee Holloway. Increased anti-American sentiment may have forced Dutch legislators to vote against sending troops to Afghanistan.

Evidently, the US and the Netherlands wanted the Natalee Holloway case to go away. The US remained silent about the young woman's fate, and the Dutch allowed Aruba to sabotage the case. On 23 December 2005, Prime Minister Balkenende decided to deploy additional Dutch troops to Afghanistan; on 3 February 2006, The Hague approved his decision. The US got the Dutch troops it wanted, and Royal Dutch Shell got the Iraqi oil it wanted.

Justice for Natalee Holloway may have been a victim of the "Big Picture" in the Global War on Terror. Undeniably, Big Oil has a stake in that part of the war in Iraq, which claims to advance American values. Why is it that American values, such as blind justice, do not appear to apply for Miss Holloway's family? But this war has been governed by paradoxes: the current Administration (and probably the next one, too) tells America that in order to spread US values, torture warehouses are indispensible; an increase in American-controlled oil drives gas prices up, not down; and bringing civil liberties to strangers 8,000 miles away, necessitates abandoning justice for Americans wherever they may be: at home, abroad, or just off-shore.

Patrick Cloutier is a writer who lives in Hartford, CT. He be contacted at patrick_john_cloutier@yahoo.com.

http://tinyurl.com/39rw2q

Very interesting article, *******.

I agree. Good research!!!!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: MumInOhio on January 11, 2008, 10:24:57 AM
Do we know who this is? Is it a new name?

Name: Francisco Thiel  
Date:08 June 2005
Pages: 3
Writer/Initiator: Dennis Jacobs & Juan Boezem
Description: indication of an area  

Hi ldstlou...I had seen that before and for some reason thought that he was ALE describing the area..doesn't really make sense, but that was my thoughts. (He is not listed on the Dr Phil log as one of ALE doing any questioning.)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Buckeye on January 11, 2008, 10:26:56 AM
Do we know who this is? Is it a new name?

Name: Francisco Thiel  
Date:08 June 2005
Pages: 3
Writer/Initiator: Dennis Jacobs & Juan Boezem
Description: indication of an area  

Old thread identifies him as a fisherman:

Francisco Remigio Thiel   fishermen      6/5/2005   13:55


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 11, 2008, 10:28:01 AM
private eye said:

Junior Sportster took your instruction as well, wanting to be the man that his dad and brother are. God help what your poor daughter must think of her importance in the world as it is plain to her that women are worthless as her male role models have shown her and spineless as you have so obviously demonstrated to her


Does Anita have a daughter??  :2doh:

No, I was promptly corrected. I am not sure what may me think she did!!!!!!!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 11, 2008, 10:29:40 AM
Is it possible to actually review the documents or can we simply access the index of the documents provided?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Buckeye on January 11, 2008, 10:31:20 AM
private eye said:

Junior Sportster took your instruction as well, wanting to be the man that his dad and brother are. God help what your poor daughter must think of her importance in the world as it is plain to her that women are worthless as her male role models have shown her and spineless as you have so obviously demonstrated to her


Does Anita have a daughter??  :2doh:

No, I was promptly corrected. I am not sure what may me think she did!!!!!!!!!!

Well there are pictures of a pretty blonde with "the family" in New York and again at the airport in Holland when Joran first went there.  I don't know who she is.  Thought maybe you had an inside scoop.........


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Buckeye on January 11, 2008, 10:35:34 AM
Is it possible to actually review the documents or can we simply access the index of the documents provided?

Some documents have been posted.  Most, have not.  The list is in response to the Phil McGraw request for disclosure by the Kalpos.  They are listing the documents, in their possession, that would coorelate with the McGraw request.  Whether they have, or will send McGraw copies, remains to be seen........


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 11, 2008, 10:40:01 AM
Here is the latest from Natalee's Freebirds:



PRIME MINISTER NELSON ODUBER A MAN OF HIS WORD - OR PART OF THE ARUBAN COVER-UP?


When questioned about a cover up taking place, Jorge Pesquera, then President of Aruba's AHATA replied,

"Yes...yes there was." (p. 194 Beth Holloway book Loving Natalee).


Now that the criminal case against the 3 main suspects in Natalee Holloway's disappearance has been closed by Aruban officials, perhaps it is time for Prime Minister Nelson Oduber to make good on his intentions.

On November 9 of 2005, Nelson Oduber stated that he would like an "investigation into the investigation" conducted. He reiterated this intent in late January of 2006.

We agree it is high time for such an investigation.

With the numerous questionable and downright unethical activities of law enforcement, judiciary members, and government officials - Miss Holloway's fellow U.S. citizens request the documented facts that show who played key roles in "making mistakes" in this investigation.

From the detectives involved, to the initial prosecutor handling differing suspects and witnesses in different manners, to the judges ruling inconsistently and in a biased manner - we agree with Aruba's Prime Minister, in that there is definite cause for an in-depth look into these actions.

Greta Van Susteren - April 13
Professor from the Netherlands


“The investigation doesn't strike me as an example of professionalism. The investigation from the onset was somewhat bungled.”
refugeesunleashed.net/post-33291.html&highlight=greta#33291

DIARIO Aruba
4/6/2006


ORANJESTAD(AAN): Dutch criminal law experts recently expressed big criticism about the Aruban police investigation into the disappearance of Natalee Holloway
They call the investigation methods strange and unprofessional.

“It is incomprehensible that police, after an important tip about the location of Natalee Holloway’s body, to not go search immediately.” ~ criminal law scholar of the University of Amsterdam, Menno Dolman

“This is very strange. Normally the area is closed off immediately, to dig and search for clues, but not in Aruba”. ~ legal psychologist, Peter van Koppen

“Total madness. “This is a total error” ~ criminal law expert of the University of Leiden, Hans Nijboer

“The media is the last option for investigators, you do not give out information that only the guilty could know.” ~ criminal law scholar of the University of Amsterdam, Menno Dolman
http://getagripmonkey.blogspot.com/2006_04_02_archive.html

Aruba’s prime minister believes that authorities made mistakes at the start of the investigation of the Natalee Holloway case. ~ Ruben Trapenberg, Aruban Government Spokesperson
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2005-08-22-aruba_x.htm



DIARIO Aruba
11/09/2005


The Premier also made the promise that when the Holloway investigation ends, to bring an investigation into finding out what and how things went wrong.
posted by Getagrip @ 11/10/2005 12:45:00 AM


Amigoe
Jan 23, 2006

Oduber wants the discrepancies
in the Holloway-case be investigated

ARUBA -- After the Holloway-case is closed, Prime Minister Nelson Oduber (MEP) wants a thorough investigation be conducted on the course of everything that had to do with the investigation on the disappeared American teenager, especially the begin phase. He thinks that mistakes were made especially in this phase


*Will Prime Minister stand true to his own words?

*Will he finally authorize an unbiased agency to conduct an investigation into the persons and activities associated with this case?

*Will Aruba open their dossier to a competent investigative team for all the world to see what “mistakes” were made and by whom?


Prime Minister Nelson Oduber has made numerous differing statements about his true feelings about Natalee Holloway, her family, and his country’s investigation into her disappearance.

*Will the world finally be able to see if Aruba's Prime Minister is a man of his word?

*Does he finally realize that coming clean with the truth about this investigation will be the first step in repairing Aruba’s damaged tourism numbers?


"We've been working 50 years, day and night, to build up tourism," Oduber said last week.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,160064,00.html
 




Natalee and her family deserve justice, and we will not let up until they have it!
Natalee’s Freebirds

http://nataleesfreebirds.blogspot.com/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 11, 2008, 10:40:19 AM
Do we know who this is? Is it a new name?

Name: Francisco Thiel  
Date:08 June 2005
Pages: 3
Writer/Initiator: Dennis Jacobs & Juan Boezem
Description: indication of an area  

Old thread identifies him as a fisherman:

Francisco Remigio Thiel   fishermen      6/5/2005   13:55

Thanks Buckeye...answered my own question...but should have waited for you...lol..you are MUCH faster!!!
For some reason...when I went you know where...I know, I know...I should stay away...lol...and they had a discovery list, I thought some of it was new. I was wrong.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 11, 2008, 10:48:02 AM
I agree PI. I remember when my older sister made a mistake in her youth, and my parents found out about it. They sat her down and said we will back you 100% in correcting this mistake, but if you don't go to the authorities, we will. You have to face the consequences. That had to be one of the hardest things my parents ever did because she could have faced jail time!! But they went to the authorities, and my sister had to acknowledge her part and do what it took to correct it!!!
By the way...today my sister is happily married and the mother of 6 fantastic kids and doing fine!!! lol
Parents have to teach their children to take responsibility for their actions, not cover for them!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 11, 2008, 11:06:02 AM
From Persistence:
http://nholloway.blogspot.com/2008/01/x-persistence.html

Update: Fri 12-Jan 1145 hrs
The seas calmed down dramatically since Wednesday. Last night was smooth sailing and saw double the progress of the previous nights. ...more to come later.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 11, 2008, 11:14:20 AM
This is a report on the investigation of the investigators
from Amigoe Spring of 2006


ORANJESTAD – An investigation report on the efficiency of the Police Corps of Aruba (KPA) regarding integrity, states that the control on work procedure is poorly; promotional transfers take place, while there is a disciplinary investigation going; and there is no correct follow up after irregularities within the corps are signaled.

Forensic Services Caribbean in Curaçao did the investigation by order of Justice-minister Rudy Croes (MEP). Amigoe learned this from documents that the paper received for perusal. The report was already given to the then chief of police Ronny Bernadina on April 3rd of this year. The investigation took place in 2005 and based on the findings, Forensic Services Caribbean advices to draw up a master plan to deal with the integrity risks. Based on conversations with some key-officials within the KPA and external partners of the corps, like the Security Service, the Public Prosecutor, and the Coastguard, they have mapped nine risks. They have also analyzed summaries of integrity rules violations within the corps. They first noticed that many rules regarding work procedures and work processes are established, but that these are not univocal and not conveniently arranged. The procedures differ per (police-, editor) district and are implemented or interpreted differently.” Besides, several regulations are not complete. Not everybody is familiar with the procedures, they are difficult of access, and several of the versions used are outdated. Several procedures are too complex and have therefore lost their powers. “They have become dead letters”, states the report. There is lack of control on the observance of the procedures in all sectors of the organization. This has to do with not having qualitatively good employees on managerial positions. Another reason is that there is lack of open culture, in which employees dare to talk to each other. In order to restrict this risk, the bureau advices to further specify the career policy and to organize trainings that would provoke a culture change within the police corps. A third risk that can cause the integrity of the corps to come into play is the lack of confidence when it comes to exchange information. Confidential information is leaked to third parties and nobody knows what to do with the information or that the information can be used against you. “This lack of confidence has consequences for the internal- and external communication”, states the report. It also forms a hindrance for working effectively and efficiently. Their advice is again a culture chance in order to create confidence.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 11, 2008, 11:24:05 AM
I agree PI. I remember when my older sister made a mistake in her youth, and my parents found out about it. They sat her down and said we will back you 100% in correcting this mistake, but if you don't go to the authorities, we will. You have to face the consequences. That had to be one of the hardest things my parents ever did because she could have faced jail time!! But they went to the authorities, and my sister had to acknowledge her part and do what it took to correct it!!!
By the way...today my sister is happily married and the mother of 6 fantastic kids and doing fine!!! lol
Parents have to teach their children to take responsibility for their actions, not cover for them!!

And the funny thing is that people are understanding, appreciative of the candor, and remarkably forgiving. In addition, the punishment is not as bad as what the fear drives us to believe, and the "guilty" feel 100% better. But it is a hard step to take, for both parent and child.

I have always thought that I could probably get past what Joran did, if he just admitted what it was, and showed his remorse and sincerity by doing whateevr he could to ease Beth's pain. I am sure there was some accident involved in this, and that the boys were young and immature, and I understand how things can go seriously wrong, much more than what was intended. But accidents happen in a flash and you can't go back and correct them. However this coverup is done methodically, with sober minds, adult minds, intentionally and visibly causing Beth tremendous anguish, and they don't seem to care one iota. In fact they act like it humors them. That is why I am going to enjoy watching Anita suffer her pain and feel no guilt, because it is her choice and her choice alone. This is no longer 2 kids out playing and one does something to hurt the other, this is no children at play.

The pain Beth feels is from the "blows" adults who are stone sober are hitting her with in the broad daylight.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 11, 2008, 11:32:48 AM
I agree PI. I remember when my older sister made a mistake in her youth, and my parents found out about it. They sat her down and said we will back you 100% in correcting this mistake, but if you don't go to the authorities, we will. You have to face the consequences. That had to be one of the hardest things my parents ever did because she could have faced jail time!! But they went to the authorities, and my sister had to acknowledge her part and do what it took to correct it!!!
By the way...today my sister is happily married and the mother of 6 fantastic kids and doing fine!!! lol
Parents have to teach their children to take responsibility for their actions, not cover for them!!

And the funny thing is that people are understanding, appreciative of the candor, and remarkably forgiving. In addition, the punishment is not as bad as what the fear drives us to believe, and the "guilty" feel 100% better. But it is a hard step to take, for both parent and child.

I have always thought that I could probably get past what Joran did, if he just admitted what it was, and showed his remorse and sincerity by doing whateevr he could to ease Beth's pain. I am sure there was some accident involved in this, and that the boys were young and immature, and I understand how things can go seriously wrong, much more than what was intended. But accidents happen in a flash and you can't go back and correct them. However this coverup is done methodically, with sober minds, adult minds, intentionally and visibly causing Beth tremendous anguish, and they don't seem to care one iota. In fact they act like it humors them. That is why I am going to enjoy watching Anita suffer her pain and feel no guilt, because it is her choice and her choice alone. This is no longer 2 kids out playing and one does something to hurt the other, this is no children at play.

The pain Beth feels is from the "blows" adults who are stone sober are hitting her with in the broad daylight.

Oh, not only are they hitting her with stones, they are doing it maliciously and with as much psychological damage as they can muster to try and bring her down ie: the latest being committed over the holidays as though the holidays aren't tough enough for Beth and the Family to get through!!
That's ok Aruba, Beth will strike back on Oprah, and her words will reach millions of ears. And although the refugees laughed the last time I said this, I will say it again so you get a taste of Beth's retaliation. Beth's words will be heard by MILLIONS!!! and they will tell a friend and they will tell a friend...and so on and so on!!!
Can't wait to see Aruba's tourism numbers this year...can we say..TANKED!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: kkate on January 11, 2008, 12:01:29 PM

Oh, not only are they hitting her with stones, they are doing it maliciously and with as much psychological damage as they can muster to try and bring her down ie: the latest being committed over the holidays as though the holidays aren't tough enough for Beth and the Family to get through!!
That's ok Aruba, Beth will strike back on Oprah, and her words will reach millions of ears. And although the refugees laughed the last time I said this, I will say it again so you get a taste of Beth's retaliation. Beth's words will be heard by MILLIONS!!! and they will tell a friend and they will tell a friend...and so on and so on!!!
Can't wait to see Aruba's tourism numbers this year...can we say..TANKED!!!
From your lips (or fingers) to God's ears :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Buckeye on January 11, 2008, 12:16:47 PM
Google Translated page:

 Tonight in Pauw & Witteman: Joran van der Sloot and his parents Paul and Anita and crime reporter Peter R. de Vries over de zaak Natalee Holloway De Vries on the case of Natalee Holloway

http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=nl&u=http://pauwenwitteman.vara.nl/&sa=X&oi=translate&resnum=1&ct=result&prev=/search%3Fq%3D%2522%2BPauw%2B%2526%2BWitteman%2B%2522%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DG


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Buckeye on January 11, 2008, 12:21:05 PM
Google Translated page:

 Tonight in Pauw & Witteman: Joran van der Sloot and his parents Paul and Anita and crime reporter Peter R. de Vries over de zaak Natalee Holloway De Vries on the case of Natalee Holloway

http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=nl&u=http://pauwenwitteman.vara.nl/&sa=X&oi=translate&resnum=1&ct=result&prev=/search%3Fq%3D%2522%2BPauw%2B%2526%2BWitteman%2B%2522%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DG


Link without translation.  Is Robert still around??

http://pauwenwitteman.vara.nl/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 11, 2008, 12:26:01 PM
Google Translated page:

 Tonight in Pauw & Witteman: Joran van der Sloot and his parents Paul and Anita and crime reporter Peter R. de Vries over de zaak Natalee Holloway De Vries on the case of Natalee Holloway

http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=nl&u=http://pauwenwitteman.vara.nl/&sa=X&oi=translate&resnum=1&ct=result&prev=/search%3Fq%3D%2522%2BPauw%2B%2526%2BWitteman%2B%2522%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DG


Link without translation.  Is Robert still around??

http://pauwenwitteman.vara.nl/

When I followed the link it translated


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Buckeye on January 11, 2008, 12:39:02 PM
I am getting  Dutch at the links.

http://pauwenwitteman.vara.nl/uitzending.php?id=274


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 11, 2008, 12:46:09 PM
I am getting  Dutch at the links.

http://pauwenwitteman.vara.nl/uitzending.php?id=274

Me, too, Buckeye...and translation through Babelfish is poor.  Maybe BTGirl's friend can translate for us.  Is this a new show being broadcast by DeVries? 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: sirensong on January 11, 2008, 12:49:21 PM
This is the translation I get:

Tonight in Peacock & Witteman:  Joran van of the Ditch and its parents Paul and Anita and crime reporter Godfather R. the Freeze over the affair Natalee Holloway

On 30 May 2005, the American girl Natalee Holloway disappeared without trace.  They fourth holiday on Aruba and was seen with Joran van of the Ditch for the most last time.  Shorten after Natalee's disappearance became clear that Joran her it recently had seen.  After an evening with Joran and the brothers Kalpoe, nothing is walk learnt more of her.  The mother of Natalee mobilized the American media that self poured massive on the affair.  The Arubaanse police suspects on that moment Joran and Deepak and Satish Kalpoe of it behind the disappearance to sit.  Also Paul van of the Ditch, the father of Joran, is picked up.  In total, the police arrests ten men in connection with the affair.  For want of proof, all come suspected, going out Joran included, on feet. 

In November 2007, Joran studies meanwhile in Arnhem, hits the police him again in the manacles.  On Aruba, new proof material would be found, according to it.  He becomes to Aruba overgebracht.  End of December comes prevent Joran free and is the suspicion against him lifted. 

Tonight Joran give and its parents Paul and Anita their last interview over the affair Holloway.  They choose for 'disclosure', either total openness of affairs. 

Also Godfather R. the Freeze slides tonight on.  He held self intensively busy with this affair.  For its Tv-program made he under others an extra long broadcast on Aruba.  On 7 deceber, when Joran on going out feet came, was De Freeze to guest with Peacock & Witteman.  He said convinced then to be by the involvement of Joran by the disappearance of Natalee.  Look at this conversation


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 11, 2008, 12:51:17 PM
Doesn't look like it says a whole lot:

Vanavond in peacock & Witteman: Joran of of the ditch and are parents Paul and Anita and crime report donor peter R. freezes concerning the case Natalee Holloway

On 30 May 2005 the American little girl Natalee Holloway disappeared without a trace. Them fourth holiday on Aruba and was seen for last with Joran of of the ditch. Shortly after Natalee's disappearance became clear that Joran had seen her last. After an evening step with Joran and the brothers Kalpoe nothing more of her has been learned. The mother of Natalee mobilised the American media which paid themselves massively on the matter. Of it the arubaanse police force suspects Joran and Deepak and Satish Kalpoe at that moment behind disappearance to sit. Also Paul of of the ditch, the father of Joran, are taken up. In sum the police force ten arrests people concerning the matter. For lack of proof come all suspected, Joran incluis, on free feet.

In November 2007, meanwhile the police force studies Joran him other time in the buoys in arnhem, beats. On Aruba new proof material have been found, thus it Public Prosecution Service. He is transmitted to Aruba. By the end of December comes Joran rather and the suspicion against him has been raised.

Vanavond Joran give and are parents Paul and Anita their last interview concerning the matter Holloway. They choose for ' disclosure ' oftewel total openness of matter.

Also peter R. freezes schuift vanavond. He occupied himself intensively with this matter. For its tv-programma he made among other things an extra long retransmission on Aruba. On 7 deceber, then Joran on free feet came, were freeze at guest at peacock & Witteman. He said have persuaded then of the involvement of Joran at disappearance of Natalee.

http://pauwenwitteman.vara.nl/uitzending.php?id=274


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 11, 2008, 12:54:44 PM
Oprah Winfrey lo dedica programa na Holloway

http://www.24ora.com/content/view/3450/6/#jc_allComments

Hopi ta esnan cu a pensa cu Oprah Winfrey no lo hasi un programa di sensacion entorno e caso di e desaparicion di Natalee Holloway. Durante e ultimo añanan esaki no a pasa tampoco. Sinembargo awor cu e caso a wordo sera Diaranson awor 16 di Januari Oprah Winfrey lo tin den su programa mama di Natalee Holloway y e ruman. Oprah tin un sintonia di alrededor di 23 miyon na merca y ta wordo mira den mas cu 112 pais.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tranny  :roll:

much is esnan cu owing to think cu oprah winfrey not will make one declaration of policy of sensacion entorno the caso of the desaparicion of natalee holloway. during the ultimo añanan this not owing to happen niether. sinembargo now cu the caso owing to wordo close diaranson now 16 of january oprah winfrey will have in his declaration of policy mother of natalee holloway y the brother. oprah have one sintonia of alrededor of 23 miyon at merca y is wordo see in more cu 112 country. come across


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: sirensong on January 11, 2008, 12:55:06 PM
There is a place to post your comments at that link.  That SOB and his parents are always saying they want the truth to be out there, but the interviewers aren't aware of enough details to catch them at the lies they tell instead of the truth.  If I had the time, I would download all the hard work from the monkeys and summarize it for them to read before the interview.  You notice, this is the last they will speak of Natalee Holloway.  Well, OVER OUR DEAD BODIES!!  You will never forget Natalee  Holloway!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 11, 2008, 12:59:27 PM

And the funny thing is that people are understanding, appreciative of the candor, and remarkably forgiving. In addition, the punishment is not as bad as what the fear drives us to believe, and the "guilty" feel 100% better. But it is a hard step to take, for both parent and child.

I have always thought that I could probably get past what Joran did, if he just admitted what it was, and showed his remorse and sincerity by doing whateevr he could to ease Beth's pain. I am sure there was some accident involved in this, and that the boys were young and immature, and I understand how things can go seriously wrong, much more than what was intended. But accidents happen in a flash and you can't go back and correct them. However this coverup is done methodically, with sober minds, adult minds, intentionally and visibly causing Beth tremendous anguish, and they don't seem to care one iota. In fact they act like it humors them. That is why I am going to enjoy watching Anita suffer her pain and feel no guilt, because it is her choice and her choice alone. This is no longer 2 kids out playing and one does something to hurt the other, this is no children at play.

The pain Beth feels is from the "blows" adults who are stone sober are hitting her with in the broad daylight.

PI ... I agree.

I contend there was a plan that involved wrongdoing against the person of Natalee Holloway but ... I believe that her ultimate death was not intended.  In other words ... the real crime is the coverup which was and still is being abetted by adults who are distancing Joran from the consequences of his actions.

To some extend my heart goes out to Joran Van der Sloot.  I believe that this young man is a product of his upbringing.  His parents had a God-given responsibility to teach him that in a civilized society there are legal and moral boundaries that have been established for his well being and the well being of others.  His parents also did not teach him that there are consquences that have to be faced for making personal choices to disregard those established boundaries.

Unless there is "genuine" repentence ... these untaught and unlearned lessons of life will have far reaching consequences ... consequences that reach beyond the Natalee Holloway case ... consequences which imply that "other Natalees" are at risk ... consequences which dictate that Joran will be eventually held accountable ... held accountable when he stands alone before the Judge of all judges ... to receive an ultimate ruling.  There will be no high paid attorneys ... no Daddy with connections ... no Mommy as a character witness ...

That being said ... I do  believe that an even higher judgement awaits Paulus and Anita Van der sloot.  John Kelly words rang true when he implied ... it was a parent's enabling that put all the event into motion in regards to the the Natalee Holloway case.

Janet

++++++++++++++

John Kelly
'Rita Cosby Live & Direct'
April 11, 2006


JOHN Q. KELLY, HOLLOWAY FAMILY ATTORNEY: Well, if you look at the surveillance video footage, it appears that he’s the one sitting directly next to her and tries to engage her in conversation a couple of times. And it’s sort of ironic that it’s his father who brought his underage son to a casino and left him there after he left, with access to his line of credit, to put this unfortunate chain of events in process.

You know, if Joran had never been there, not been allowed in there, because he’s underage and wasn’t accompanied by his father, the whole rest of the night wouldn’t have happened.

COSBY: You know, and, John, also, why would that be a significant—why is that in conflict to something else we’ve heard maybe from Paulus before?

KELLY: Well, he’s just claiming that, you know, he’s kept an eye on his son, you know, he’s kept him on a short leash, and, you know, his son is very well-behaved. And it turns out that he’s, you know, got him at casinos. If you’re under 18, you’re not legally even allowed in casinos, so his son was breaking the law with him enabling it.


Jossy Mansur
DANA PRETZER
July 23, 2007


Dana: One thing that makes my listeners scratch their heads so to speak and wonder, myself included and we'll talk about it again, is the fact of the underage drinking and gambling that had been going on admittedly by young van der Sloot.  Was there ever any discussion or has there ever been any discussion at least of filing some charges as far as that goes?

Jossy:  No, there hasn't been any of that. The authorities have just (inaudible) it aside, they haven't paid any attention to it then and they're not paying any attention to it now and over the past 26 months.  I haven't seen anything in the direction of trying to make some kind of statement that this is not (inaudiable) at least make some sort of a statement that this is not (inaubible) because it is a known fact that as an underage he wasn't supposed to be in the casino, much less in the company of his father. He was there, there are video tapes to prove that and still the authorities haven't done anything with regard to that specific case.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 11, 2008, 01:05:48 PM
Joran targeted her.

If it was just an accident - no need to cover it up.
NO FORGIVENESS UNTIL THEY ARE IN PRISON FOR THEIR CRIMES AGAINST AN AMERICAN TOURIST - PERIOD AND
ALL THOSE INVOLVED IN THE OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 11, 2008, 01:18:44 PM
I agree PI. I remember when my older sister made a mistake in her youth, and my parents found out about it. They sat her down and said we will back you 100% in correcting this mistake, but if you don't go to the authorities, we will. You have to face the consequences. That had to be one of the hardest things my parents ever did because she could have faced jail time!! But they went to the authorities, and my sister had to acknowledge her part and do what it took to correct it!!!
By the way...today my sister is happily married and the mother of 6 fantastic kids and doing fine!!! lol
Parents have to teach their children to take responsibility for their actions, not cover for them!!

ldstlou ... my husband and I were put in a similar situation with our eldest son when he was in his late teens.  We discovered that he had submitted a false claim to an insurance company in regards to wheels that were allegedly stolen from his precious Datsun 510.

We reported our findings to his insurance adjuster while he was at school.  If thoughts could kill ... Tamikosmom would not be posting on the Natalee Holloway case today.

Why was his Dad and I suspicious?  This had been drooling for three months over fancy wheels advertised in a catalog ... fancy wheels he knew darn well he could not afford.  We suspected that he anticipated an insurance settlement would go a long ways towards the purchase of those wheels.  We were right.   :wink:

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 11, 2008, 01:24:43 PM
I agree PI. I remember when my older sister made a mistake in her youth, and my parents found out about it. They sat her down and said we will back you 100% in correcting this mistake, but if you don't go to the authorities, we will. You have to face the consequences. That had to be one of the hardest things my parents ever did because she could have faced jail time!! But they went to the authorities, and my sister had to acknowledge her part and do what it took to correct it!!!
By the way...today my sister is happily married and the mother of 6 fantastic kids and doing fine!!! lol
Parents have to teach their children to take responsibility for their actions, not cover for them!!

ldstlou ... my husband and I were put in a similar situation with our eldest son when he was in his late teens.  We discovered that he had submitted a false claim to an insurance company in regards to wheels that were allegedly stolen from his precious Datsun 510.

We reported our findings to his insurance adjuster while he was at school.  If thoughts could kill ... Tamikosmom would not be posting on the Natalee Holloway case today.

Why was his Dad and I suspicious?  This had been drooling for three months over fancy wheels advertised in a catalog ... fancy wheels he knew darn well he could not afford.  We suspected that he anticipated an insurance settlement would go a long ways towards the purchase of those wheels.  We were right.   :wink:

Janet


And with the beauty of hindsight, or at the time by simply having faith, what seemed to get your son in trouble actually had a positive ending. If you hadn't of corrected it yourselves, he might have gotten away with it but kept doing it until he got in worse trouble, as an adult, with greater consequences. But it is heartbreaking at the time a parent has to act and you wonder did I do the right thing, will he ever forgive us etc. I admire you.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Vicki on January 11, 2008, 01:30:22 PM

Justice for Natalee Holloway: Lost in the 'War on Terror'?
English (US)  January 10th, 2008 (The Corner Report)

By Patrick Cloutier

On 30 May 2005, Natalee Holloway disappeared while vacationing on Aruba. As of 18 December 2007, Aruban authorities closed her case. From beginning to end, the island's authorities demonstrated no interest in solving her disappearance. Why didn't the US pressure Aruba to look more thoroughly into Natalee Holloway's disappearance? Some answers may lie with Big Oil and the 'Global War on Terror.'


At the time of Natalee Holloway's disappearance, the U.S. Government was pressing NATO countries for military contributions to the Global War on Terror. One of these countries was the Netherlands. Aruba belongs to the Netherlands.

The Netherlands did have 1,400 men in Iraq, but withdrew them all in March 2005. The withdrawal of the Dutch from Iraq came soon after Spain--another NATO member--withdrew its 1,300 troops. The withdrawal of two NATO countries from Iraq was publicly damaging to the American war effort. If the Netherlands could be convinced to send more troops to Afghanistan, the move from Iraq would look more like a transfer than a withdrawal.

However, it was public outcry against Dutch abuse of Iraqi detainees that forced The Hague to withdraw its soldiers from Iraq, and the public remained sensitive to deploying troops anywhere else.

Unlike Spain, the Dutch government could be pressured by economic interests to provide troops for Washington. Royal Dutch Shell, an oil company, wanted to exploit Iraqi oil. But the Dutch troop withdrawal from Iraq may have jeopardized Shell's standing with the Bush-Cheney team. Sending Dutch troops to Afghanistan, however, might help Shell regain favor with them.

Then came the disappearance of Natalee Holloway on Dutch Aruba.

The primary suspect in Miss Holloway's disappearance was a Dutch citizen, Joran van der Sloot. Worse was the fact that Joran's father, Paulus van der Sloot, was a Dutch judge-in-training, who appears to have used his legal training to help his son evade prosecution. The United States, whose tourists spend millions of dollars into the island economy, could have influenced local authorities to make a proper investigation, but did not. Why?

An American attempt to force an investigation of Natalee Holloway's disappearance might have embarrassed US efforts to get a Dutch troop commitment. Already angered by American conduct in Iraq, Dutch opinion might have reacted strongly against US efforts to strong-arm Aruba over Natalee Holloway. Increased anti-American sentiment may have forced Dutch legislators to vote against sending troops to Afghanistan.

Evidently, the US and the Netherlands wanted the Natalee Holloway case to go away. The US remained silent about the young woman's fate, and the Dutch allowed Aruba to sabotage the case. On 23 December 2005, Prime Minister Balkenende decided to deploy additional Dutch troops to Afghanistan; on 3 February 2006, The Hague approved his decision. The US got the Dutch troops it wanted, and Royal Dutch Shell got the Iraqi oil it wanted.

Justice for Natalee Holloway may have been a victim of the "Big Picture" in the Global War on Terror. Undeniably, Big Oil has a stake in that part of the war in Iraq, which claims to advance American values. Why is it that American values, such as blind justice, do not appear to apply for Miss Holloway's family? But this war has been governed by paradoxes: the current Administration (and probably the next one, too) tells America that in order to spread US values, torture warehouses are indispensible; an increase in American-controlled oil drives gas prices up, not down; and bringing civil liberties to strangers 8,000 miles away, necessitates abandoning justice for Americans wherever they may be: at home, abroad, or just off-shore.

Patrick Cloutier is a writer who lives in Hartford, CT. He be contacted at patrick_john_cloutier@yahoo.com.

http://tinyurl.com/39rw2q



Hey *******, I email this man Patrick and asked if he would attend the Boston show and he said yes he would go....Can you email me at justicefornatalee@gmail.com.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 11, 2008, 01:31:34 PM
Joran targeted her.

If it was just an accident - no need to cover it up.
NO FORGIVENESS UNTIL THEY ARE IN PRISON FOR THEIR CRIMES AGAINST AN AMERICAN TOURIST - PERIOD AND
ALL THOSE INVOLVED IN THE OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE!


Kermit ... I believe Natalee's death was unintended.  I suspect that the plan was to leave a drugged/passed out Natalee at the beach after the "pimps" were through using her.  Natalee would wake up ... make her own way back to the hotel and ... then catch the plan for home.

I suspect that Natalee had to "disappear" because of the incriminating DNA ... the result of wrongdoing ... that would be found on her person.

Keep in mind that Joran conveyed to Greta that this had happened twenty times before and nothing happened.

Janet

++++++++++++


Jossy Mansur
'Scarborough Country'
August 26, 2005


DANIELS:  It definitely smells that way.  You know, if you take the prosecution‘s statement at its face, we are talking on a whole new level, the charges here.  We are talking about drugs.  We are talking about rape and we are talking about rape of many different people.  There are four guys now in custody, four best friends.  What does that tell you?
 
MANSUR:  Well, what it tells me is that, really, these four guys are friends.  They belong to the same group, these party boys that go out and prey on young, unsuspected girls or other kinds of girls also that are out to have a good time, not suspecting what they‘re in for with these predators around.

And they are—they not only appear in photographs together, but I understand that Freddy lives very near to the Joran house.  So, there is a bond between them.  There is a group that they call themselves the pimps, in which all of these participate.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 11, 2008, 01:35:57 PM
Joran targeted her.

If it was just an accident - no need to cover it up.
NO FORGIVENESS UNTIL THEY ARE IN PRISON FOR THEIR CRIMES AGAINST AN AMERICAN TOURIST - PERIOD AND
ALL THOSE INVOLVED IN THE OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE!



I think there was an accidental death in the commission of a crime, granted, and I think he needs to pay the consequences. I think what he did had horrible consequences and was wrong, on many levels. I think he absolutely has some consequences to face.

But for me, the actions of his parents directing him to cover up rather than tell the truth, is a more hideous crime. Remember, Joran broke and told the truth on June 10th,2005 and if he had been left alone or supported by his parents, a lot of hurt could have been spared, Beth could have been healing, and even Joran would have been much better off and would have a better chance of leading a healthy life. Him breaking down and admitting what happened to Natalee would have brought him a lot of compassion and understanding from Beth's family,  and from the legal system, if they had one.

His parents took a horrible situation and act, and made it much much worse, and made Joran's role much worse and his personal future beyond redemption.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 11, 2008, 01:46:57 PM
Joran targeted her.

If it was just an accident - no need to cover it up.
NO FORGIVENESS UNTIL THEY ARE IN PRISON FOR THEIR CRIMES AGAINST AN AMERICAN TOURIST - PERIOD AND
ALL THOSE INVOLVED IN THE OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE!



I think there was an accidental death in the commission of a crime, granted, and I think he needs to pay the consequences. I think what he did had horrible consequences and was wrong, on many levels. I think he absolutely has some consequences to face.

But for me, the actions of his parents directing him to cover up rather than tell the truth, is a more hideous crime. Remember, Joran broke and told the truth on June 10th,2005 and if he had been left alone or supported by his parents, a lot of hurt could have been spared, Beth could have been healing, and even Joran would have been much better off and would have a better chance of leading a healthy life. Him breaking down and admitting what happened to Natalee would have brought him a lot of compassion and understanding from Beth's family,  and from the legal system, if they had one.

His parents took a horrible situation and act, and made it much much worse, and made Joran's role much worse and his personal future beyond redemption.

But don't think I don't hold him responsible for his actions or that I don't think his actions were horrible, I simply think his parent's actions are worse and that they have done him a huge wrong in their advice


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 11, 2008, 02:04:29 PM
DANA PRETZER SHOW TONIGHT:

The Dana Pretzer Show - Listen LIVE TONIGHT at 9PM Eastern - Guests Include
Dana Shafman, Cathy Wilson and Fred Rosen

Join dana this week as he welcomes:

    * Dana Shafman discusses the new idea of Taser Parties
    * Cathy Wilson, mother of missing person Matthew Wilson
    * Fred Rosen crime historian and author.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: dennisintn on January 11, 2008, 02:11:40 PM
Joran targeted her.

If it was just an accident - no need to cover it up.
NO FORGIVENESS UNTIL THEY ARE IN PRISON FOR THEIR CRIMES AGAINST AN AMERICAN TOURIST - PERIOD AND
ALL THOSE INVOLVED IN THE OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE!

i'm standing shoulder to shoulder with you on this, kermit.
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 11, 2008, 02:20:26 PM
I agree PI. I remember when my older sister made a mistake in her youth, and my parents found out about it. They sat her down and said we will back you 100% in correcting this mistake, but if you don't go to the authorities, we will. You have to face the consequences. That had to be one of the hardest things my parents ever did because she could have faced jail time!! But they went to the authorities, and my sister had to acknowledge her part and do what it took to correct it!!!
By the way...today my sister is happily married and the mother of 6 fantastic kids and doing fine!!! lol
Parents have to teach their children to take responsibility for their actions, not cover for them!!

ldstlou ... my husband and I were put in a similar situation with our eldest son when he was in his late teens.  We discovered that he had submitted a false claim to an insurance company in regards to wheels that were allegedly stolen from his precious Datsun 510.

We reported our findings to his insurance adjuster while he was at school.  If thoughts could kill ... Tamikosmom would not be posting on the Natalee Holloway case today.

Why was his Dad and I suspicious?  This had been drooling for three months over fancy wheels advertised in a catalog ... fancy wheels he knew darn well he could not afford.  We suspected that he anticipated an insurance settlement would go a long ways towards the purchase of those wheels.  We were right.   :wink:

Janet


And with the beauty of hindsight, or at the time by simply having faith, what seemed to get your son in trouble actually had a positive ending. If you hadn't of corrected it yourselves, he might have gotten away with it but kept doing it until he got in worse trouble, as an adult, with greater consequences. But it is heartbreaking at the time a parent has to act and you wonder did I do the right thing, will he ever forgive us etc. I admire you.

PI ... what was heartbreaking ... my husband and I were worried sick regarding the direction in life that our son was taking.

However ... it was never a question of whether or not our son would forgive us.  It was him that did wrong ... not us.  We were secure in the action that we took ... an action we believed was right.

The situation did not resolve itself overnight but ... fast forward twenty years ... this guy ... who is now a proud Father ... comprehends perfectly what motivated his own Father to pick up the phone and call that adjuster ... the motivation was LOVE.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 11, 2008, 02:26:03 PM
I agree PI. I remember when my older sister made a mistake in her youth, and my parents found out about it. They sat her down and said we will back you 100% in correcting this mistake, but if you don't go to the authorities, we will. You have to face the consequences. That had to be one of the hardest things my parents ever did because she could have faced jail time!! But they went to the authorities, and my sister had to acknowledge her part and do what it took to correct it!!!
By the way...today my sister is happily married and the mother of 6 fantastic kids and doing fine!!! lol
Parents have to teach their children to take responsibility for their actions, not cover for them!!

ldstlou ... my husband and I were put in a similar situation with our eldest son when he was in his late teens.  We discovered that he had submitted a false claim to an insurance company in regards to wheels that were allegedly stolen from his precious Datsun 510.

We reported our findings to his insurance adjuster while he was at school.  If thoughts could kill ... Tamikosmom would not be posting on the Natalee Holloway case today.

Why was his Dad and I suspicious?  This had been drooling for three months over fancy wheels advertised in a catalog ... fancy wheels he knew darn well he could not afford.  We suspected that he anticipated an insurance settlement would go a long ways towards the purchase of those wheels.  We were right.   :wink:

Janet


And with the beauty of hindsight, or at the time by simply having faith, what seemed to get your son in trouble actually had a positive ending. If you hadn't of corrected it yourselves, he might have gotten away with it but kept doing it until he got in worse trouble, as an adult, with greater consequences. But it is heartbreaking at the time a parent has to act and you wonder did I do the right thing, will he ever forgive us etc. I admire you.

PI ... what was heartbreaking ... my husband and I were worried sick regarding the direction in life that our son was taking.

However ... it was never a question of whether or not our son would forgive us.  It was him that did wrong ... not us.  We were secure in the action that we took ... an action we believed was right.

The situation did not resolve itself overnight but ... fast forward twenty years ... this guy ... who is now a proud Father ... comprehends perfectly what motivated his own Father to pick up the phone and call that adjuster ... the motivation was LOVE.

Janet


And that is the view at the end of the path I wish Anita could see.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 11, 2008, 02:30:29 PM
I agree PI. I remember when my older sister made a mistake in her youth, and my parents found out about it. They sat her down and said we will back you 100% in correcting this mistake, but if you don't go to the authorities, we will. You have to face the consequences. That had to be one of the hardest things my parents ever did because she could have faced jail time!! But they went to the authorities, and my sister had to acknowledge her part and do what it took to correct it!!!
By the way...today my sister is happily married and the mother of 6 fantastic kids and doing fine!!! lol
Parents have to teach their children to take responsibility for their actions, not cover for them!!

ldstlou ... my husband and I were put in a similar situation with our eldest son when he was in his late teens.  We discovered that he had submitted a false claim to an insurance company in regards to wheels that were allegedly stolen from his precious Datsun 510.

We reported our findings to his insurance adjuster while he was at school.  If thoughts could kill ... Tamikosmom would not be posting on the Natalee Holloway case today.

Why was his Dad and I suspicious?  This had been drooling for three months over fancy wheels advertised in a catalog ... fancy wheels he knew darn well he could not afford.  We suspected that he anticipated an insurance settlement would go a long ways towards the purchase of those wheels.  We were right.   :wink:

Janet


And with the beauty of hindsight, or at the time by simply having faith, what seemed to get your son in trouble actually had a positive ending. If you hadn't of corrected it yourselves, he might have gotten away with it but kept doing it until he got in worse trouble, as an adult, with greater consequences. But it is heartbreaking at the time a parent has to act and you wonder did I do the right thing, will he ever forgive us etc. I admire you.

PI ... what was heartbreaking ... my husband and I were worried sick regarding the direction in life that our son was taking.

However ... it was never a question of whether or not our son would forgive us.  It was him that did wrong ... not us.  We were secure in the action that we took ... an action we believed was right.

The situation did not resolve itself overnight but ... fast forward twenty years ... this guy ... who is now a proud Father ... comprehends perfectly what motivated his own Father to pick up the phone and call that adjuster ... the motivation was LOVE.

Janet


And that is the view at the end of the path I wish Anita could see.

I also wish she had your moral compass and parental insight. You both were great parents, ooops, are:)))))))


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 11, 2008, 02:57:51 PM
Joran targeted her.

If it was just an accident - no need to cover it up.
NO FORGIVENESS UNTIL THEY ARE IN PRISON FOR THEIR CRIMES AGAINST AN AMERICAN TOURIST - PERIOD AND
ALL THOSE INVOLVED IN THE OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE!

i'm standing shoulder to shoulder with you on this, kermit.
dennisintn

Both of you are the type of people everyone would like to have stand with them during a crisis. Unwavering, firm, and committed. I know Beth appreciates you.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Dayhiker on January 11, 2008, 03:02:58 PM

HERE IS SOME CLASSIC SPIN FROM REUBEN "RUBBERLEGS" TRAPPENBURG, JULY 1.2005. HIGHLIGHTS IN RED:

from drudge:

Prosecutor: 3 Charged With Aruba Murder

By PETER PRENGAMAN
The Associated Press
Friday, July 1, 2005; 5:17 PM


ORANJESTAD, Aruba -- Three young men detained in the disappearance of an Alabama teenager have been charged with murder since their arrest more than three weeks ago, Aruba's chief prosecutor told The Associated Press on Friday.

The charges were not announced at the time to protect the feelings of the family of 18-year-old Natalee Holloway, said Attorney General Karin Janssen.

"At the time, we didn't want to upset the (Holloway) family talking about murder while they searched," Janssen said.

Janssen, who has said several times in the past three weeks that no one was charged in the case, said they also kept the information quiet in order not to compromise their investigation. Authorities have said they have no physical evidence suggesting Holloway is dead.

Janssen said 17-year-old Joran van der Sloot, 17, and two Surinamese brothers who are his friends have been charged since their arrest _ 10 days after Holloway disappeared on May 30.

Also Friday, Aruba's government defended its handling of the investigation, saying many of the criticisms arose from misunderstandings of the Dutch legal system used on the Caribbean island.

Police have been criticized for letting more than a week go by without detaining the three young men last seen with Holloway and for waiting 16 days after she went missing before searching van der Sloot's home.

Ruben Trapenberg, spokesman for Prime Minister Nelson Oduber, said the government has put 21 detectives on the case.

Trapenberg also mentioned the 70 Dutch Marines on the island who helped in initial searches and were called back Thursday to comb the island again.

"They do not bungle cases," Trapenberg told The Associated Press. "Aruban police and prosecutors are professional forces that have been successful."

Prosecutors have an 89 percent conviction rate on the Dutch Caribbean island, he said. Violent crime is rare in the tourist haven.

Asked why two of three suspects were transported together, apparently giving them the opportunity to compare or arrange their stories, Trapenberg said that was done to secretly monitor what they might tell each other.


Late Thursday, CNN captured images of van der Sloot, and Deepak Kalpoe handcuffed together, being put in a car to leave San Nicolas prison. It wasn't clear where they were being taken.

The Kalpoe brothers and van der Sloot were the last ones seen with Holloway the night she disappeared. Police questioned the three that same day but did not detain them until June 9. Two other people, including van der Sloot's father, Paul, an island judicial official, were detained and released.


"One of the techniques is that after hearing separate stories and getting nowhere, prosecutors will have suspects confront each other," said Trapenberg. "The U.S. system might be different, but this technique has worked in the past here."

Trapenberg also said that police initially did not have any cause to hold the young men: "If they had arrested them immediately, they would never have collected evidence."


Natalee's mother, Beth Holloway Twitty, has repeatedly criticized investigators, saying that if she did not get answers soon she would believe they were protecting someone _ probably Joran van der Sloot because of his father's position.

"Prosecutors couldn't even attempt a cover-up because they know better than anyone that this case is under a microscope," Trapenberg said.

© 2005 The Associated Press


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 11, 2008, 03:17:56 PM

HERE IS SOME CLASSIC SPIN FROM REUBEN "RUBBERLEGS" TRAPPENBURG, JULY 1.2005. HIGHLIGHTS IN RED:

from drudge:

Prosecutor: 3 Charged With Aruba Murder

By PETER PRENGAMAN
The Associated Press
Friday, July 1, 2005; 5:17 PM


ORANJESTAD, Aruba -- Three young men detained in the disappearance of an Alabama teenager have been charged with murder since their arrest more than three weeks ago, Aruba's chief prosecutor told The Associated Press on Friday.

The charges were not announced at the time to protect the feelings of the family of 18-year-old Natalee Holloway, said Attorney General Karin Janssen.

"At the time, we didn't want to upset the (Holloway) family talking about murder while they searched," Janssen said.

Janssen, who has said several times in the past three weeks that no one was charged in the case, said they also kept the information quiet in order not to compromise their investigation. Authorities have said they have no physical evidence suggesting Holloway is dead.

Janssen said 17-year-old Joran van der Sloot, 17, and two Surinamese brothers who are his friends have been charged since their arrest _ 10 days after Holloway disappeared on May 30.

Also Friday, Aruba's government defended its handling of the investigation, saying many of the criticisms arose from misunderstandings of the Dutch legal system used on the Caribbean island.

Police have been criticized for letting more than a week go by without detaining the three young men last seen with Holloway and for waiting 16 days after she went missing before searching van der Sloot's home.

Ruben Trapenberg, spokesman for Prime Minister Nelson Oduber, said the government has put 21 detectives on the case.

Trapenberg also mentioned the 70 Dutch Marines on the island who helped in initial searches and were called back Thursday to comb the island again.

"They do not bungle cases," Trapenberg told The Associated Press. "Aruban police and prosecutors are professional forces that have been successful."

Prosecutors have an 89 percent conviction rate on the Dutch Caribbean island, he said. Violent crime is rare in the tourist haven.

Asked why two of three suspects were transported together, apparently giving them the opportunity to compare or arrange their stories, Trapenberg said that was done to secretly monitor what they might tell each other.


Late Thursday, CNN captured images of van der Sloot, and Deepak Kalpoe handcuffed together, being put in a car to leave San Nicolas prison. It wasn't clear where they were being taken.

The Kalpoe brothers and van der Sloot were the last ones seen with Holloway the night she disappeared. Police questioned the three that same day but did not detain them until June 9. Two other people, including van der Sloot's father, Paul, an island judicial official, were detained and released.


"One of the techniques is that after hearing separate stories and getting nowhere, prosecutors will have suspects confront each other," said Trapenberg. "The U.S. system might be different, but this technique has worked in the past here."

Trapenberg also said that police initially did not have any cause to hold the young men: "If they had arrested them immediately, they would never have collected evidence."


Natalee's mother, Beth Holloway Twitty, has repeatedly criticized investigators, saying that if she did not get answers soon she would believe they were protecting someone _ probably Joran van der Sloot because of his father's position.

"Prosecutors couldn't even attempt a cover-up because they know better than anyone that this case is under a microscope," Trapenberg said.

© 2005 The Associated Press

Well, despite knowing that the world had them under a microscope, they did execute a coverup while telling us all to go get "intercoursed," and claiming ooops another mistake by our little bungling keystone cops and prosecutors!!!!!!!!!!!!! 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Dayhiker on January 11, 2008, 04:19:57 PM


Well, despite knowing that the world had them under a microscope, they did execute a coverup while telling us all to go get "intercoursed," and claiming ooops another mistake by our little bungling keystone cops and prosecutors!!!!!!!!!!!!! 


PI, just look at all the officials and talking heads who have flown the coop or disappeared themselves: Reuben, Arlene, Vander Straten, Bernardina, Dompig, Janssen, Pesquera. Then you have Joran, Guido, the Gottenbos family. All have split the island.

It's not a cover-up unless people are convinced it's not a cover-up. Yeah, they might get away without prosecution but the crime against Natalee will hang over all these people's heads until they leave this earth. Then they'll have another court to deal with.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: AZLady on January 11, 2008, 04:27:09 PM
Deception is an art on Aruba.  The police and authorities practice it frequently and have for a long time.  They are very good at lying and deceiving and if anyone questions them, they blame their own ineptness.  In reality, they are far from inept.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Observer on January 11, 2008, 04:50:29 PM
Interesting article in dutch on Human Trafficking. Mentions the Loverboys and the growing problem of forced prostitution and human trafficking in the Netherlands Kingdon. Also mentions the 3 ministers who are involved in tackling this problem. The three ministers of Justice - Ernst Hirsch Ballin for Netherlands, David Dick of the West Indies and Rudy Croes of Aruba Rudy Croes being involved is like hiring OJ Simpson to lead the nation against spousal abuse  :2doh:

http://www.google.com/translate_t (Use the google translator)
http://www.ecpat.nl/ariadne/loader.php/ecpat/Actualiteiten/Krantenknipsels/Handelminderjarigen/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Observer on January 11, 2008, 05:07:48 PM
Last time Jossy talked about Natalee's case in his newspaper he mentioned he would disclose more and name names about the Aruban Minister that owned a brothel (Prostitute business) in Venezuela. WHat did this have to do with Natalee and why did he mention it? Why has he said nothing since and cancelled Dana's show?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Observer on January 11, 2008, 05:18:29 PM
Joran and Peter R de Vries are live at Dutch TV NOW!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Observer on January 11, 2008, 05:21:18 PM
Someone asked me how the Persistence got her name!  I asked my brother John how he came to give her that name and here is his answer:

Persistence is the ability to continue to push against all odds, for however long it takes……yet have the intelligence to walk away from the unachievable…………..and of course knowing the difference between the two.  In my life I have come to admire those who never quite achieve the pinnacle, but, never give up hope….keep striving……keep fighting…….Persistence………These people are the most competitive foes and most loyal allies.    They possess not only the most important God given trait, but also the second as well…………DETERMINATION…………(which by the way is the name of our next vessel)

I thought the ending was cute! :)



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 11, 2008, 05:25:20 PM
I agree PI. I remember when my older sister made a mistake in her youth, and my parents found out about it. They sat her down and said we will back you 100% in correcting this mistake, but if you don't go to the authorities, we will. You have to face the consequences. That had to be one of the hardest things my parents ever did because she could have faced jail time!! But they went to the authorities, and my sister had to acknowledge her part and do what it took to correct it!!!
By the way...today my sister is happily married and the mother of 6 fantastic kids and doing fine!!! lol
Parents have to teach their children to take responsibility for their actions, not cover for them!!

ldstlou ... my husband and I were put in a similar situation with our eldest son when he was in his late teens.  We discovered that he had submitted a false claim to an insurance company in regards to wheels that were allegedly stolen from his precious Datsun 510.

We reported our findings to his insurance adjuster while he was at school.  If thoughts could kill ... Tamikosmom would not be posting on the Natalee Holloway case today.

Why was his Dad and I suspicious?  This had been drooling for three months over fancy wheels advertised in a catalog ... fancy wheels he knew darn well he could not afford.  We suspected that he anticipated an insurance settlement would go a long ways towards the purchase of those wheels.  We were right.   :wink:

Janet


And with the beauty of hindsight, or at the time by simply having faith, what seemed to get your son in trouble actually had a positive ending. If you hadn't of corrected it yourselves, he might have gotten away with it but kept doing it until he got in worse trouble, as an adult, with greater consequences. But it is heartbreaking at the time a parent has to act and you wonder did I do the right thing, will he ever forgive us etc. I admire you.

PI ... what was heartbreaking ... my husband and I were worried sick regarding the direction in life that our son was taking.

However ... it was never a question of whether or not our son would forgive us.  It was him that did wrong ... not us.  We were secure in the action that we took ... an action we believed was right.

The situation did not resolve itself overnight but ... fast forward twenty years ... this guy ... who is now a proud Father ... comprehends perfectly what motivated his own Father to pick up the phone and call that adjuster ... the motivation was LOVE.

Janet


And that is the view at the end of the path I wish Anita could see.

I also wish she had your moral compass and parental insight. You both were great parents, ooops, are:)))))))

.... far from it.

PI ... like all parents we directed our kids on the path that we deemed was beneficial for them and ... society as a whole.  However ... looking back there are some areas of their upbringing we would have instructed or done thing differently if we had to do it over again.  However ... now that the kids are grown ... they realize the mistakes we made we derived from a foundation of love and ... they are now in a position to make positive changes in their lives.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Observer on January 11, 2008, 05:31:59 PM
False tips in the search for Jose Tromp
(Awemainta.com)
(http://img120.imageshack.us/img120/5093/tromply3.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 11, 2008, 05:36:47 PM

HERE IS SOME CLASSIC SPIN FROM REUBEN "RUBBERLEGS" TRAPPENBURG, JULY 1.2005. HIGHLIGHTS IN RED:

from drudge:

Prosecutor: 3 Charged With Aruba Murder

By PETER PRENGAMAN
The Associated Press
Friday, July 1, 2005; 5:17 PM


ORANJESTAD, Aruba -- Three young men detained in the disappearance of an Alabama teenager have been charged with murder since their arrest more than three weeks ago, Aruba's chief prosecutor told The Associated Press on Friday.

The charges were not announced at the time to protect the feelings of the family of 18-year-old Natalee Holloway, said Attorney General Karin Janssen.

"At the time, we didn't want to upset the (Holloway) family talking about murder while they searched," Janssen said.

Janssen, who has said several times in the past three weeks that no one was charged in the case, said they also kept the information quiet in order not to compromise their investigation. Authorities have said they have no physical evidence suggesting Holloway is dead.

<snipped>


Dayhiker ... considering Janssen implied there was no physical evidence in the initial detentions ... I wonder what foundation Janssen based her suspicions on.
 
Janet

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Joran van der Sloot:  Suspicion of murder and kidnapping as well as being an accessory to murder

Deepak Kalpoe:   Suspicion of murder and kidnapping as well as being an accessory to murder.

Satish Kalpoe:  Suspicion of murder and kidnapping as well as being an accessory to murder.


Arlene Ellis-Schipper
NANCY GRACE
July 20, 2005

 
ARLENE ELLIS-SCHIPPER, ARUBAN ATTORNEY: There is no grand jury in Aruba. It`s a different system. You are arrested based on suspicion, on strong suspicion.
 

Noraina Pietersz - Defence Attorney
Associated Press
June 9, 2005


Under Aruban law, only serious suspicion from investigators — not solid evidence — is needed for a judge to rule that suspects can be held, Pietersz said.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 11, 2008, 05:46:24 PM
Joran targeted her.

If it was just an accident - no need to cover it up.
NO FORGIVENESS UNTIL THEY ARE IN PRISON FOR THEIR CRIMES AGAINST AN AMERICAN TOURIST - PERIOD AND
ALL THOSE INVOLVED IN THE OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE!

i'm standing shoulder to shoulder with you on this, kermit.
dennisintn

Hear! Hear!

ribbit



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 11, 2008, 05:49:26 PM
Joran targeted her.

If it was just an accident - no need to cover it up.
NO FORGIVENESS UNTIL THEY ARE IN PRISON FOR THEIR CRIMES AGAINST AN AMERICAN TOURIST - PERIOD AND
ALL THOSE INVOLVED IN THE OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE!

i'm standing shoulder to shoulder with you on this, kermit.
dennisintn

Both of you are the type of people everyone would like to have stand with them during a crisis. Unwavering, firm, and committed. I know Beth appreciates you.


Maybe Joran will save his own parents and do teach them that truth is honor, truth is redemption.
The alternative is hell.

Kiss from the frog to Miss Beth.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Buckeye on January 11, 2008, 05:50:40 PM
I don't understand Dutch, but DeVries doesn't sound happy.  I hope someone is listening that knows what's being said.

http://player.omroep.nl/?aflID=6010887&start=0:01:06


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 11, 2008, 05:53:20 PM
Joran targeted her.

If it was just an accident - no need to cover it up.
NO FORGIVENESS UNTIL THEY ARE IN PRISON FOR THEIR CRIMES AGAINST AN AMERICAN TOURIST - PERIOD AND
ALL THOSE INVOLVED IN THE OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE!


Kermit ... I believe Natalee's death was unintended.  I suspect that the plan was to leave a drugged/passed out Natalee at the beach after the "pimps" were through using her.  Natalee would wake up ... make her own way back to the hotel and ... then catch the plan for home.

I suspect that Natalee had to "disappear" because of the incriminating DNA ... the result of wrongdoing ... that would be found on her person.

Keep in mind that Joran conveyed to Greta that this had happened twenty times before and nothing happened.

Janet

++++++++++++


Jossy Mansur
'Scarborough Country'
August 26, 2005


DANIELS:  It definitely smells that way.  You know, if you take the prosecution‘s statement at its face, we are talking on a whole new level, the charges here.  We are talking about drugs.  We are talking about rape and we are talking about rape of many different people.  There are four guys now in custody, four best friends.  What does that tell you?
 
MANSUR:  Well, what it tells me is that, really, these four guys are friends.  They belong to the same group, these party boys that go out and prey on young, unsuspected girls or other kinds of girls also that are out to have a good time, not suspecting what they‘re in for with these predators around.

And they are—they not only appear in photographs together, but I understand that Freddy lives very near to the Joran house.  So, there is a bond between them.  There is a group that they call themselves the pimps, in which all of these participate.


Unintentional means you did everything you could to save her.

So I disagree that Joran did not mean to murder Natalee. It is premeditated when you intentionally target someone to
render them unconscious in order to rape them! Dompig said it was a crime in Aruba and that Joran and Klapoes own confessions should get them 8 years! Murder would be 15 I think!

But the JUDGE let them go.





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 11, 2008, 05:53:23 PM
The comments here seem interesting...I'm not a translation whiz, though:

http://pauwenwitteman.vara.nl/uitzending.php?id=274


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 11, 2008, 05:55:25 PM
Joran targeted her.

If it was just an accident - no need to cover it up.
NO FORGIVENESS UNTIL THEY ARE IN PRISON FOR THEIR CRIMES AGAINST AN AMERICAN TOURIST - PERIOD AND
ALL THOSE INVOLVED IN THE OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE!

i'm standing shoulder to shoulder with you on this, kermit.
dennisintn

Both of you are the type of people everyone would like to have stand with them during a crisis. Unwavering, firm, and committed. I know Beth appreciates you.


Maybe Joran will save his own parents and do teach them that truth is honor, truth is redemption.
The alternative is hell.

Kiss from the frog to Miss Beth.




The real perversion of the case is that I am not sure that it isn't Joran covering up his Dad's actions!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Dayhiker on January 11, 2008, 05:55:31 PM

Dayhiker ... considering Janssen implied there was no physical evidence in the initial detentions ... I wonder what foundation Janssen based her suspicions on.
 
Janet

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Joran van der Sloot:  Suspicion of murder and kidnapping as well as being an accessory to murder

Deepak Kalpoe:   Suspicion of murder and kidnapping as well as being an accessory to murder.

Satish Kalpoe:  Suspicion of murder and kidnapping as well as being an accessory to murder.


Arlene Ellis-Schipper
NANCY GRACE
July 20, 2005

 
ARLENE ELLIS-SCHIPPER, ARUBAN ATTORNEY: There is no grand jury in Aruba. It`s a different system. You are arrested based on suspicion, on strong suspicion.
 

Noraina Pietersz - Defence Attorney
Associated Press
June 9, 2005


Under Aruban law, only serious suspicion from investigators — not solid evidence — is needed for a judge to rule that suspects can be held, Pietersz said.



Common sense would say if someone is suspected of murder and kidnapping you would want to move quickly to search their residence and property, like Karin Janssen did with the two black security guards.

I would like to know what Prosecutor Karin Jannsen based her suspicions on since she didn't bother to collect hard physical evidence on a timely basis at the residence of Joran and Paulus van der Sloot, instead waiting 15 days before performing a search and a limited one at that.

I would also like to know why Karin Jannsen hasn't been held accountable by the glorious Dutch System for her participation in the cover-up.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 11, 2008, 05:56:58 PM
I don't understand Dutch, but DeVries doesn't sound happy.  I hope someone is listening that knows what's being said.

http://player.omroep.nl/?aflID=6010887&start=0:01:06

******* - can you screenshot that photo of Joran and PAPA?

PAPA has called in to the show!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 11, 2008, 05:58:51 PM

Dayhiker ... considering Janssen implied there was no physical evidence in the initial detentions ... I wonder what foundation Janssen based her suspicions on.
 
Janet

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Joran van der Sloot:  Suspicion of murder and kidnapping as well as being an accessory to murder

Deepak Kalpoe:   Suspicion of murder and kidnapping as well as being an accessory to murder.

Satish Kalpoe:  Suspicion of murder and kidnapping as well as being an accessory to murder.


Arlene Ellis-Schipper
NANCY GRACE
July 20, 2005

 
ARLENE ELLIS-SCHIPPER, ARUBAN ATTORNEY: There is no grand jury in Aruba. It`s a different system. You are arrested based on suspicion, on strong suspicion.
 

Noraina Pietersz - Defence Attorney
Associated Press
June 9, 2005


Under Aruban law, only serious suspicion from investigators — not solid evidence — is needed for a judge to rule that suspects can be held, Pietersz said.



Common sense would say if someone is suspected of murder and kidnapping you would want to move quickly to search their residence and property, like Karin Janssen did with the two black security guards.

I would like to know what Prosecutor Karin Jannsen based her suspicions on since she didn't bother to collect hard physical evidence on a timely basis at the residence of Joran and Paulus van der Sloot, instead waiting 15 days before performing a search and a limited one at that.

I would also like to know why Karin Jannsen hasn't been held accountable by the glorious Dutch System for her participation in the cover-up.



I agree!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

What the haystacks!

She arrested and charged the Security Guards with murder!
Based upon the statements and NO EVIDENCE!

Then she doesn't get the right search warrarnt and lets Corky the Judge Bob Witt tell her he is reducing the search warrarent. WHO IS KARIN JANSEEN WORKING FOR?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 11, 2008, 05:59:16 PM
Joran targeted her.

If it was just an accident - no need to cover it up.
NO FORGIVENESS UNTIL THEY ARE IN PRISON FOR THEIR CRIMES AGAINST AN AMERICAN TOURIST - PERIOD AND
ALL THOSE INVOLVED IN THE OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE!

i'm standing shoulder to shoulder with you on this, kermit.
dennisintn

Both of you are the type of people everyone would like to have stand with them during a crisis. Unwavering, firm, and committed. I know Beth appreciates you.


Maybe Joran will save his own parents and do teach them that truth is honor, truth is redemption.
The alternative is hell.

Kiss from the frog to Miss Beth.




The real perversion of the case is that I am not sure that it isn't Joran covering up his Dad's actions!!!

BINGO!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Dayhiker on January 11, 2008, 06:03:00 PM
I don't understand Dutch, but DeVries doesn't sound happy.  I hope someone is listening that knows what's being said.

http://player.omroep.nl/?aflID=6010887&start=0:01:06


This will be an interesting transcript. DeVries should be highly pissed after Joran trashing him in to the media.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Observer on January 11, 2008, 06:03:15 PM
Article from 2006(Translation)

Netherlands helps Holloway case

ORANJESTAD

Netherlands sends shortly agents at his own expense to the disappearance of Natalee Holloway to investigate. The Korps National Police Services in the Netherlands (KLPD) is at the request of Justice Minister Rudy Croes (MEP), Aruba helping with the case of American teenager. Croes has also asked Interpol the file from end to end.

Over a year ago Holloway disappeared during a school trip. All that time has worked on the case, without a trace of the girl was found. A week ago, Minister Croes a letter sent to The Hague with a request for help. He hopes that politieassistentie from Netherlands there a quicker solution to the unsolved mystery.

"Aruba lives along with the parents and close relatives, despite the negative campaign against the island is conducted," Croes writes in the letter.

The request was made to Minister Johan Remkes (VVD) of the Interior and Kingdom Relations for the minister, Atzo Nicolai (VVD). The KLPD will following the call on the entire leadership of the investigation.

Politiebeambten of the Dutch corps are also specially on the issue. Netherlands will also pay the costs that are involved with the deployment and residence of these agents on Aruba.

Furthermore, they are provided with a separate location from where they can work on the case. The police may carry a weapon and use it, and get opsporingsbevoegdheid. Also, they are provided with the relevant information from the file-Holloway and gives them access to all information systems.

The letter promises that the Dutch minister Croes agents receive the full cooperation of the (tracking) authorities and the administration. The letter shows that Croes also has made a formal request to Interpol to consider the case on the roughness from end to end.

"At the request of the Attorney-General seeks Interpol has still not accepted by the FBI (American federal police, ed.) released data in the table above matter," the minister wrote in the letter.

The Public Attorney's Office (OM) confirmed to be aware of the request, but stressed that it did not originate with Attorney General Theresa Croes-Pedra Fernandes, but from the Minister of Justice itself. He would Interpol in July have asked for help when he visited the headquarters of the international police organisation in the French city of Lyon.

The OM is also aware of the cooperation between the police forces from the Netherlands and Aruba and politieniveau reports that it is regulated and there is no request from the PPS has been done. "The criminal investigation into the Holloway case is still open. Dutch If the police can offer assistance, they are certainly welcome," says adviser Mariaine Croes.

http://www.suriname.nu/0niba/niba109a.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Observer on January 11, 2008, 06:06:26 PM
I don't understand Dutch, but DeVries doesn't sound happy.  I hope someone is listening that knows what's being said.

http://player.omroep.nl/?aflID=6010887&start=0:01:06

******* - can you screenshot that photo of Joran and PAPA?

PAPA has called in to the show!

Hi Kermit..Sure I'll do it now.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Dayhiker on January 11, 2008, 06:08:52 PM

Common sense would say if someone is suspected of murder and kidnapping you would want to move quickly to search their residence and property, like Karin Janssen did with the two black security guards.

I would like to know what Prosecutor Karin Jannsen based her suspicions on since she didn't bother to collect hard physical evidence on a timely basis at the residence of Joran and Paulus van der Sloot, instead waiting 15 days before performing a search and a limited one at that.

I would also like to know why Karin Jannsen hasn't been held accountable by the glorious Dutch System for her participation in the cover-up.



I agree!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

What the haystacks!

She arrested and charged the Security Guards with murder!
Based upon the statements and NO EVIDENCE!

Then she doesn't get the right search warrarnt and lets Corky the Judge Bob Witt tell her he is reducing the search warrarent. WHO IS KARIN JANSEEN WORKING FOR?



This is clear corruption and favoritism by a Dutch prosecutor who has no regard for justice. Pure unadulterated cronyism on Karin Jannsen's part.

And the goverment of Holland just sat back and let their corrupt countrymen, that they put in office, run wild.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 11, 2008, 06:09:42 PM
Article from 2006(Translation)

Netherlands helps Holloway case

ORANJESTAD

Netherlands sends shortly agents at his own expense to the disappearance of Natalee Holloway to investigate. The Korps National Police Services in the Netherlands (KLPD) is at the request of Justice Minister Rudy Croes (MEP), Aruba helping with the case of American teenager. Croes has also asked Interpol the file from end to end.

Over a year ago Holloway disappeared during a school trip. All that time has worked on the case, without a trace of the girl was found. A week ago, Minister Croes a letter sent to The Hague with a request for help. He hopes that politieassistentie from Netherlands there a quicker solution to the unsolved mystery.

"Aruba lives along with the parents and close relatives, despite the negative campaign against the island is conducted," Croes writes in the letter.

The request was made to Minister Johan Remkes (VVD) of the Interior and Kingdom Relations for the minister, Atzo Nicolai (VVD). The KLPD will following the call on the entire leadership of the investigation.

Politiebeambten of the Dutch corps are also specially on the issue. Netherlands will also pay the costs that are involved with the deployment and residence of these agents on Aruba.

Furthermore, they are provided with a separate location from where they can work on the case. The police may carry a weapon and use it, and get opsporingsbevoegdheid. Also, they are provided with the relevant information from the file-Holloway and gives them access to all information systems.

The letter promises that the Dutch minister Croes agents receive the full cooperation of the (tracking) authorities and the administration. The letter shows that Croes also has made a formal request to Interpol to consider the case on the roughness from end to end.

"At the request of the Attorney-General seeks Interpol has still not accepted by the FBI (American federal police, ed.) released data in the table above matter," the minister wrote in the letter.

The Public Attorney's Office (OM) confirmed to be aware of the request, but stressed that it did not originate with Attorney General Theresa Croes-Pedra Fernandes, but from the Minister of Justice itself. He would Interpol in July have asked for help when he visited the headquarters of the international police organisation in the French city of Lyon.

The OM is also aware of the cooperation between the police forces from the Netherlands and Aruba and politieniveau reports that it is regulated and there is no request from the PPS has been done. "The criminal investigation into the Holloway case is still open. Dutch If the police can offer assistance, they are certainly welcome," says adviser Mariaine Croes.

http://www.suriname.nu/0niba/niba109a.html




Thanks ******* for posting this little nugget which once again demonstrates the jerk chain they are all involved in.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 11, 2008, 06:10:07 PM
Oprah has a forum where they allow posts about the shows.  There are 2 threads now regarding the upcomming show with Beth and Matt.  Heli and others at RU are starting to post there.  One of Heli's posts was already removed. 

Here are the links to the two threads in case anyone wants to leave a message.  I believe you have to register to post.  The poster with the nickname jhellshot is Heli from RU.  She has now reposted:


http://www.oprah.com/community/thread/13348?tstart=0

http://www.oprah.com/community/thread/13274?tstart=0


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 11, 2008, 06:10:24 PM
I don't understand Dutch, but DeVries doesn't sound happy.  I hope someone is listening that knows what's being said.

http://player.omroep.nl/?aflID=6010887&start=0:01:06

******* - can you screenshot that photo of Joran and PAPA?

PAPA has called in to the show!

Thank you.



Hi Kermit..Sure I'll do it now.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Dayhiker on January 11, 2008, 06:10:27 PM

The real perversion of the case is that I am not sure that it isn't Joran covering up his Dad's actions!!!

Deepak to Joran: "Your own father."


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 11, 2008, 06:13:56 PM

I think there was an accidental death in the commission of a crime, granted, and I think he needs to pay the consequences. I think what he did had horrible consequences and was wrong, on many levels. I think he absolutely has some consequences to face.

<snipped>


PI ... Natalee's death may not have been intentional but ... it was a result of wrongdoing by Joran and others and ... justice demands that there must be accountability.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 11, 2008, 06:14:40 PM
Oprah has a forum where they allow posts about the shows.  There are 2 threads now regarding the upcomming show with Beth and Matt.  Heli and others at RU are starting to post there.  One of Heli's posts was already removed. 

Here are the links to the two threads in case anyone wants to leave a message.  I believe you have to register to post.  The poster with the nickname jhellshot is Heli from RU.  She has now reposted:


http://www.oprah.com/community/thread/13348?tstart=0

http://www.oprah.com/community/thread/13274?tstart=0

ROFLMAO! Heli is spouting her 1st Amendment rights were violated and then tries to justify her post with a rant about the Hootie poster! Gee whilikers! Next thing ya know a caller from INDIA is going to call in! LOL



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 11, 2008, 06:16:11 PM

The real perversion of the case is that I am not sure that it isn't Joran covering up his Dad's actions!!!

Deepak to Joran: "Your own father."

And your cousins

And your cousins mother's brother's father Dompig

And your father's friend Arlene and her cousin Guido

And there ya have it!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 11, 2008, 06:19:35 PM
Regarding the Dutch show that the Sloots were just on.  This is from a poster at BFN:

Posted by JOS at BFN:


Quote
Peter R de Vries aks tough questions, I am amazed, it is breath taking.

Quote
Anita says she suspected him in the beginning, paul is upset that Joran lied for such a long time. Peter intervenes all the time with questions. It sis going very fast right now.

Quote
peter confronts joran with sms and emails from kalpoe brothers about leaving her at the beach and says his statements during the progam is even contradictive

Quote
talk host asks peter what he thinks that happened, he says that it would be possible that an accident happened, more scenarios possible

what triggers peter? joran has lied and peter does not see the reason for those lies. peter asks paul if he supports joran silence during the interrogations. paul has advised joran to keep silence.

it is going to fast, but peter makes it difficult

Quote
peter thinks that joran kept silent because he had lied so much and he was scared to make mistakes. joran says he hopes the case will be solved and that peter will apologi
ze

Quote
anita: police had tunnel vision, they wanted a suspect. joran is geting more red i the face during the show

Quote
paul: natalee's profile has not been studied, who did she meet at aruba, why isn't her computer not being examined

Quote
paul: there is a video on which natalees was seen with somebody else. where is this video, witness has seen natalee with another man before that night

Quote
anita: beth kidnapping poster is suggestive, as if she knew nat was not kidnapped

Quote
peter asks questions about photo chopping

joran: it was a joke, he doesn't want to say who chopped it

peter: the one who chopped has been paid, he has proof.

Quote
anita: she wants the investigation to be continued, first for family than for joran. she wants an inquiry into the inquiry.
she says that there are indications that she is not dead.

Quote
paul says she is not dead, joran says he thinks she is dead because it would be inhumane for her to keep hidden.

Quote
anita: hopefully peter continues the search

Quote
peter: the case is still open for him

Quote
joran asks peter again if he wants to apologize, peter says "what do you think" , joran says he doesn't think peter is capable of making apologizes, the audience laughs, end of show.



Quote
http://omroep.vara.nl/Uitzending_gemist.167.0.html

go to this page later on this weekend and click on

Pauw & Witteman 11 januari 2008


Quote
Anita was talking all the time, saying at first she thought there had been an accident. Unfortunately the hosts did not question her saying that the Sloots have had (at least in the past) that she was still alive.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Observer on January 11, 2008, 06:19:40 PM
This is from Pauw & Witteman 7-12-07 (Not tonights live show)
http://player.omroep.nl/?aflID=6010887&start=0:01:06

(http://img233.imageshack.us/img233/8568/joranandpapavn9.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 11, 2008, 06:27:09 PM
Regarding the Dutch show that the Sloots were just on.  This is from a poster at BFN:

Posted by JOS at BFN:


Quote
Peter R de Vries aks tough questions, I am amazed, it is breath taking.

Quote
Anita says she suspected him in the beginning, paul is upset that Joran lied for such a long time. Peter intervenes all the time with questions. It sis going very fast right now.

Quote
peter confronts joran with sms and emails from kalpoe brothers about leaving her at the beach and says his statements during the progam is even contradictive

Quote
talk host asks peter what he thinks that happened, he says that it would be possible that an accident happened, more scenarios possible

what triggers peter? joran has lied and peter does not see the reason for those lies. peter asks paul if he supports joran silence during the interrogations. paul has advised joran to keep silence.

it is going to fast, but peter makes it difficult

Quote
peter thinks that joran kept silent because he had lied so much and he was scared to make mistakes. joran says he hopes the case will be solved and that peter will apologi
ze

Quote
anita: police had tunnel vision, they wanted a suspect. joran is geting more red i the face during the show

Quote
paul: natalee's profile has not been studied, who did she meet at aruba, why isn't her computer not being examined

Quote
paul: there is a video on which natalees was seen with somebody else. where is this video, witness has seen natalee with another man before that night

Quote
anita: beth kidnapping poster is suggestive, as if she knew nat was not kidnapped

Quote
peter asks questions about photo chopping

joran: it was a joke, he doesn't want to say who chopped it

peter: the one who chopped has been paid, he has proof.

Quote
anita: she wants the investigation to be continued, first for family than for joran. she wants an inquiry into the inquiry.
she says that there are indications that she is not dead.

Quote
paul says she is not dead, joran says he thinks she is dead because it would be inhumane for her to keep hidden.

Quote
anita: hopefully peter continues the search

Quote
peter: the case is still open for him

Quote
joran asks peter again if he wants to apologize, peter says "what do you think" , joran says he doesn't think peter is capable of making apologizes, the audience laughs, end of show.



Quote
http://omroep.vara.nl/Uitzending_gemist.167.0.html

go to this page later on this weekend and click on

Pauw & Witteman 11 januari 2008


Quote
Anita was talking all the time, saying at first she thought there had been an accident. Unfortunately the hosts did not question her saying that the Sloots have had (at least in the past) that she was still alive.



Thank you Klaas.  Thank you JOS.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 11, 2008, 06:33:01 PM
This is from Pauw & Witteman 7-12-07 (Not tonights live show)
http://player.omroep.nl/?aflID=6010887&start=0:01:06

(http://img233.imageshack.us/img233/8568/joranandpapavn9.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)



LIKE FATHER, LIKE SON---YUCK :smt096 :smt076


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 11, 2008, 06:38:57 PM
This is from Pauw & Witteman 7-12-07 (Not tonights live show)
http://player.omroep.nl/?aflID=6010887&start=0:01:06

(http://img233.imageshack.us/img233/8568/joranandpapavn9.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)


He's got his fathers mouth and Frankenstein's forehead.  This photo creeps me out.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 11, 2008, 06:39:48 PM

The real perversion of the case is that I am not sure that it isn't Joran covering up his Dad's actions!!!

Joran's official declarations establish the May 29, 2005 chain of events and ... the chain of events imply that Paulus left the casino part way through the poker tournament ... leaving Joran at the poker table.  Joran then went to the black jack table following the poker tournament and ... Natalee Holloway enter the scenario a short time later.

If the casino video captures Paulus conversing with Natalee at the black jack table ... the implication is that Joran is covering for his Father.  He lied regarding in his declaration in regards to what time Paulus left the casino.  Lies are created to cover the truth.  Why did Joran deem it necessary in his declaration to cover the truth regarding a "Paulus/Natalee connection".

Janet

+++++++++++++

Joran van der Sloot
Suspect Statement
June 9, 2005


I was done sooner than my father and I went and hung around in the casino. When it was half time of the game my father wanted to go home to go and babysit my ten year old brother. At my father's request I sat in for him and played "Texas Hold'm poker. I am not sure as to when half time was but I think it was between 19.00 and 20.00 hours. I kept on gambling until I lost too. This was according to me until 21.30 to 22.00 hours. I went to walk around in the casino and after that went to the "Blackjack" table to play blackjack. While I was sitting at the table the girl "Natalee" that is missing now to the blackjack table together with her friends.


Paulus van der Sloot
Witness Statement
June 18, 2005


On May 29th 2005, at approximately 16.00 hours, I went with Joran to the “Free Carribean Stud Tournament” in the Holiday Inn. During the break, at approximately 18.30 hours, I went back home. My youngest son Sebastian who was playing at a friends house was due to be dropped off at home around that time. Joran, with my permission, took over my seat because he had been eliminated earlier. We had agreed that he would call me after the tournament, in order for me to come and pick him up. He did indeed call me and at approximately 23.00 hour I picked him up near the Mc Donalds in Palm Beach with my red Suzuki. We drove home and I went to bed.


Katherine (Madison) Whatley
FBI Statement
July 12, 2005


After swimming at the hotel on Sunday, WHATLEY and other classmates, including HOLLOWAY, ate dinner at a restaurant next to the hotel. After dinner they went to the casino at the hotel. A few classmates were gambling at a card table along with an "older man" and YURON VAN DER SLOOT. (Whatley 302)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 11, 2008, 06:44:39 PM
The comments here seem interesting...I'm not a translation whiz, though:

http://pauwenwitteman.vara.nl/uitzending.php?id=274

There are more comments....



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Observer on January 11, 2008, 06:45:24 PM
We know Paulus was sleeping in the main house when Natalee dissapeared and Anita was away. Why is that?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 11, 2008, 06:49:04 PM
Oprah has a forum where they allow posts about the shows.  There are 2 threads now regarding the upcomming show with Beth and Matt.  Heli and others at RU are starting to post there.  One of Heli's posts was already removed. 

Here are the links to the two threads in case anyone wants to leave a message.  I believe you have to register to post.  The poster with the nickname jhellshot is Heli from RU.  She has now reposted:


http://www.oprah.com/community/thread/13348?tstart=0

http://www.oprah.com/community/thread/13274?tstart=0

jhelishot
3 posts since
Jan 11, 2008

Reply 1. Re: Beth Holloway and Newsmaker Follow-Ups Jan 11, 2008 4:28 PM

A very strange thing indeed happened to my comments posted on the "Justice for Natalee" thread here on January 10, 2008. I'll duplicate it here, in the interest of free speech and my voice being every bit as valid as any others. Miss Oprah, you are a proponent of the 1st Amendment aren't you? My post contained no libel, defamation or inappropriate language, therefore, I am repeating it below and look forward to having my 1st Amendment rights honoured by asking you to refrain from deleting it this time. Thanks in advance.

Ms Holloway reports she knew immediately, within seconds of receiving "the call" that Natalee had been kidnapped in Aruba yet the first poster she distributed in Aruba read like this:

"Please call me Hootie, I miss you and love you. Mom is here on Aruba and I really want to talk to you. Please call me on my local cell phone XXX XXX" Big Hootie.

What mother learning that her daughter has missed her flight home escalates the scenario immediately to kidnap rather than the logical thought of accident, injury or illness. Ms Holloway's first poster appears to make it clear that she had insight into Natalee having absconded of her own free will. Perhaps Ms Holloway could be asked on January 16 to explain the inconsistency of that poster with her insistence to the media that Natalee had been kidnapped ... actually that Natalee had been drugged, kidnapped, gangraped, killed, put into a fish trap and dumped in the ocean.

As of today's date there continues to be no evidence of a crime committed against Natalee and certainly no evidence that she's dead. Of note, the FBI's website describes Natalee as "SEEKING INFORMATION", not KIDNAPPED, not MISSING, not ENDANGERED ...

Oprah, this is more than a valid question and in the interest of presenting a balanced interview, it would be great if you could address this issue with Ms Holloway.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Observer on January 11, 2008, 06:50:16 PM
The comments here seem interesting...I'm not a translation whiz, though:

http://pauwenwitteman.vara.nl/uitzending.php?id=274

There are more comments....



By gisella Bauschke on 12-01-2008 at 00:34
Ladies and gentlemen,
So far, I am not doing this matter, but heck, Peter R. De Vries there is always impressive.
What is the father annoying, not one time, he runs one of your questions answered, but began an argument that nothing to do with your question. And if someone in the judiciary? Impressive son, his reasoning, his gestures, his opinion, de Vries mans is not enough excuse - if necessary - to offer.
After my opinion, there is something wrong with this good family

Wazigheid asset!
By Martijn van Meekeren on 12-01-2008 at 00:29
If anything has become clear tonight is that nothing is clear. I would not really know what to think of Joran and his parents. His lies are remarkable but the statement by the panic which lies have been told that he does have something plausibels! I know just (still) does not and all those psychologists of the cold ground, the truth is not closer!
Peter is wrong!
By Anton on 12-01-2008 at 00:26
I think the family van der sloot very correct about. I have a lot of respect for Joran and the appropriate way in which he answered the questions. For me he is 100% innocent.
Furthermore, I think that far too much of Peter Tunnel suffers. He continues to insist on the lies, while Joran in the whole does not deny. Furthermore Peters supports arguments only on the theory of unanswered questions, while Joran utemeljil and answered them all.
And that for such a young person ... clever!
PET
By corry on 12-01-2008 at 00:18
Is it possible that we have some youth respect and politeness to teach adults during a conversation? Can it even without jijen and jouen? Joran Saturday not to Peter R. De Vries in the classroom?
And calls can also be conducted without wearing a cap?
I have difficulty with this boy, especially for the way in which he talked about the girl. His easy way of lying.
Let us hope that this matter can be resolved again
Solution
By Ziener on 12-01-2008 at 00:16
They called Holl away. So it is weggerend only question is where.
Peter R de Vries is man enough
By wies on 12-01-2008 at 00:16
Find that Joran smakeloos insensitive and greedy.
Then he really seemed contradictory statements against him.
I can understand that the mother of Nataly H. Vastbijt themselves in the case, her daughter has vanished.
That boy would I not trust meter.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 11, 2008, 06:50:55 PM
How dare Anita and Paulus say "there are indications she is not dead."

What are those indications?  Show us.
Mos said the first of December that they believe she is dead.

If they have indications that she is not for God's sake tell her family.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 11, 2008, 06:55:31 PM

The real perversion of the case is that I am not sure that it isn't Joran covering up his Dad's actions!!!

Deepak to Joran: "Your own father."

Dayhiker ... I do believe that those words imply that Paulus van der Sloot was involved to some extent in the events encompassing of the morning when Natalee went missing.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: dennisintn on January 11, 2008, 06:57:36 PM
Oprah has a forum where they allow posts about the shows.  There are 2 threads now regarding the upcomming show with Beth and Matt.  Heli and others at RU are starting to post there.  One of Heli's posts was already removed. 

Here are the links to the two threads in case anyone wants to leave a message.  I believe you have to register to post.  The poster with the nickname jhellshot is Heli from RU.  She has now reposted:


http://www.oprah.com/community/thread/13348?tstart=0

http://www.oprah.com/community/thread/13274?tstart=0

ROFLMAO! Heli is spouting her 1st Amendment rights were violated and then tries to justify her post with a rant about the Hootie poster! Gee whilikers! Next thing ya know a caller from INDIA is going to call in! LOL


no, no, no, please, not the "caller from india", i almost died laughing at that fiasco.  and the worst part of that is, they haven't gotten any better at their games.  it's downright insulting to everyone's intelligence that they think anything would believe that stuff they put out.
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 11, 2008, 06:58:12 PM
Thank you, *******...my translation attempts were not as clear.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: San on January 11, 2008, 06:58:37 PM
This is from Pauw & Witteman 7-12-07 (Not tonights live show)
http://player.omroep.nl/?aflID=6010887&start=0:01:06

(http://img233.imageshack.us/img233/8568/joranandpapavn9.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)


He's got his fathers mouth and Frankenstein's forehead.  This photo creeps me out.

Yep two nuts.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: dennisintn on January 11, 2008, 07:01:06 PM
How dare Anita and Paulus say "there are indications she is not dead."

What are those indications?  Show us.
Mos said the first of December that they believe she is dead.

If they have indications that she is not for God's sake tell her family.
that's as bad as taco. saying they had proof that jvds couldn't have be responsible for natalee's disappearance, and then letting his client sit for l5 days in solitary invoking his right to silence.  they had the undivided attention of mos and klpd and a.l.e. to share all this "evidence" taco. was bragging about having. 
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Buckeye on January 11, 2008, 07:04:17 PM
Lazlo at RU;

Lazlo  PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 6:58 pm         

Atmosphere of the confrontation:


De Vries: You are a self admitted liar.

Joran and Anita: Joran was never in therapy for lying.

Interviewer: But you said that even in your book!

Paulus: All we wanted to do is help and not obstruct the investigation.

De Vries: Is that is why you advised Joran to not talk? How does that help the investigation?

Joran: I kept my mouth shut because I do not trust the Aruban jurdical system.

Paulus: I adviced him to keep his mouth closed.

De Vries: How can you explain that being a judge and if you just said all you ever wanted was to help the ongoing investigation, how does it help if your son does not talk, does not give any explanation?

Paulus: Everything was already answered.

De Vries: Is that so? I wonder!

Anita: Every time Joran pointed out a centimeter further on the beach they said that was yet another version of the story.

De Vries: A centimer? Joran lied kilometers! In my opnion ppl decide to keep their mouths shut when they are afraid they do not recall their lies.

De Vries: Why did you lie Joran?

Joran: I was afraid and the family was at my house.

De Vries: If you are afraid the more reason to tell the truth, why not the girl wanted to stay on the beach herself right? You had to go, why lie, why these long made up stories all 3 of you told, if nothing happened nothing to lie about?

Anita: These boys were asked incredible questions, the interrogators had their analyses ready before interrogation.

De Vries: Yes, what do you think, he is last seen with the girl and tells all these lies, of course they had a scenario ready!

And so on


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Observer on January 11, 2008, 07:10:38 PM
I see they posted my comment  :wink:

But most of it got cut off..:( They must have a limit of words per comment.

The key to solving this crime is the obvious cover up. Paul Van Der Sloot told people,is on tape and witnesses heard he had two contacts with natalee and picked her and joran up at  four AM. That was clearly understood by the Supreme Court of Aruba.

Since when do murder and kidnapping suspects get immunity from having there houses searched. Well Obvious Cover up and even last week Judge Wit said Commissioner Dompig Obstructed Justice and wanted the Van Der Sloots to have privacy from having there house searched. He said the prosecution never asked to search more than just Jorans small apartment. I could write a book about the obvious cover up with Paul Van Der sloots close friends and the Aruban Govt. Why are they allowed to change statements,obstruct juctice and sabotage a murder investigation? Why has the Cover up never been investigated?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 11, 2008, 07:14:28 PM
This is from Pauw & Witteman 7-12-07 (Not tonights live show)
http://player.omroep.nl/?aflID=6010887&start=0:01:06

(http://img233.imageshack.us/img233/8568/joranandpapavn9.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)



LIKE FATHER, LIKE SON---YUCK :smt096 :smt076

Well I said flies were going to flock to his open fly in the photo and I was wrong and apologize. Maggots seem to have escaped from that fly and look at the size of that maggot:) It even has teeth!!!!!!!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 11, 2008, 07:15:41 PM
DANA PRETZER SHOW TONIGHT:

The Dana Pretzer Show - Listen LIVE TONIGHT at 9PM Eastern - Guests Include
Dana Shafman, Cathy Wilson and Fred Rosen

Join dana this week as he welcomes:

    * Dana Shafman discusses the new idea of Taser Parties
    * Cathy Wilson, mother of missing person Matthew Wilson
    * Fred Rosen crime historian and author.



REMINDER - TONIGHT ON DANA PRETZER


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 11, 2008, 07:16:43 PM
I see they posted my comment  :wink:

But most of it got cut off..:( They must have a limit of words per comment.

The key to solving this crime is the obvious cover up. Paul Van Der Sloot told people,is on tape and witnesses heard he had two contacts with natalee and picked her and joran up at  four AM. That was clearly understood by the Supreme Court of Aruba.

Since when do murder and kidnapping suspects get immunity from having there houses searched. Well Obvious Cover up and even last week Judge Wit said Commissioner Dompig Obstructed Justice and wanted the Van Der Sloots to have privacy from having there house searched. He said the prosecution never asked to search more than just Jorans small apartment. I could write a book about the obvious cover up with Paul Van Der sloots close friends and the Aruban Govt. Why are they allowed to change statements,obstruct juctice and sabotage a murder investigation? Why has the Cover up never been investigated?

So is Wit saying he didn't have to restrict the search because the prosecutor and Dompig never requested the search of the entire property?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 11, 2008, 07:20:00 PM
Lazlo at RU;

Lazlo  PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 6:58 pm         

Atmosphere of the confrontation:


De Vries: You are a self admitted liar.

Joran and Anita: Joran was never in therapy for lying.

Interviewer: But you said that even in your book!

Paulus: All we wanted to do is help and not obstruct the investigation.

De Vries: Is that is why you advised Joran to not talk? How does that help the investigation?

Joran: I kept my mouth shut because I do not trust the Aruban jurdical system.

Paulus: I adviced him to keep his mouth closed.

De Vries: How can you explain that being a judge and if you just said all you ever wanted was to help the ongoing investigation, how does it help if your son does not talk, does not give any explanation?

Paulus: Everything was already answered.

De Vries: Is that so? I wonder!

Anita: Every time Joran pointed out a centimeter further on the beach they said that was yet another version of the story.

De Vries: A centimer? Joran lied kilometers! In my opnion ppl decide to keep their mouths shut when they are afraid they do not recall their lies.

De Vries: Why did you lie Joran?

Joran: I was afraid and the family was at my house.

De Vries: If you are afraid the more reason to tell the truth, why not the girl wanted to stay on the beach herself right? You had to go, why lie, why these long made up stories all 3 of you told, if nothing happened nothing to lie about?

Anita: These boys were asked incredible questions, the interrogators had their analyses ready before interrogation.

De Vries: Yes, what do you think, he is last seen with the girl and tells all these lies, of course they had a scenario ready!

And so on

Greta, this is an interview. Take notes


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Observer on January 11, 2008, 07:22:05 PM

So is Wit saying he didn't have to restrict the search because the prosecutor and Dompig never requested the search of the entire property?
I was a little confused at what Wit said about himself. He said he had to make a quick decision when he changed the warrant I guess to just Jorans Apt and the 2 cars. He clearly said Dompig obstructed justice,wanted the Van Der Sloots to have there privacy and the OM never asked to search anything more ever again.

I think Peter De Vries Reads and Comments there..So he will see my post and maybee comment. We know he said it was changed and the Investigators were shocked when they found out all that was restricted and off limits to search.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 11, 2008, 07:22:53 PM
I am so glad Beth and Matt will be on Oprah next week.  She has great strength and I do admire her.  Every time she is on TV she reminds Aruba SHE is Natalee's voice.  I hope Matt will be Natalee's voice also--Just so Aruba doesn't think that they can just ride this out until Beth is no longer here.  They need to understand IT will never be over. There will always be someone to speak for Natalee today, tomorrow and in the long, distance future.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 11, 2008, 07:25:56 PM
This cocky pimp (Joran) trying to make Peter apologize to him.  Who does he think he is?   Guess by not getting his apology he will now sue Peter.  And THEY believe this is over with now with this latest interview?  OH have we got a surprise for them!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 11, 2008, 07:29:48 PM
I see they posted my comment  :wink:

But most of it got cut off..:( They must have a limit of words per comment.

The key to solving this crime is the obvious cover up. Paul Van Der Sloot told people,is on tape and witnesses heard he had two contacts with natalee and picked her and joran up at  four AM. That was clearly understood by the Supreme Court of Aruba.

Since when do murder and kidnapping suspects get immunity from having there houses searched. Well Obvious Cover up and even last week Judge Wit said Commissioner Dompig Obstructed Justice and wanted the Van Der Sloots to have privacy from having there house searched. He said the prosecution never asked to search more than just Jorans small apartment. I could write a book about the obvious cover up with Paul Van Der sloots close friends and the Aruban Govt. Why are they allowed to change statements,obstruct juctice and sabotage a murder investigation? Why has the Cover up never been investigated?

So is Wit saying he didn't have to restrict the search because the prosecutor and Dompig never requested the search of the entire property?

The way I understood Wit...he said that he was new at the job and had
to make a quick decision.  I thought that was a lame excuse.
Dompig blames Wit....Wit blames Dompig.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 11, 2008, 07:32:13 PM

So is Wit saying he didn't have to restrict the search because the prosecutor and Dompig never requested the search of the entire property?

PI ... it appears that Bob Witt is asserting that he only complied with the authorized warrant which limited the search to only Joran room.  Contrary to Ramm ... Witt contends that it would have been illegal for him to do otherwise.

In October, 2005 … Gerold Dompig does state that the authorized warrant limited the search to Joran’s room which backs up Bob Witt‘s words.

However … in November, 2006 …  Peter Derives and Beth Twitty publicly revealed that the authorized warrant granted a full search of the VDS’ premises and … Bob Witt reduced the scope of that search while the warrant was being excuted.

As Natalee’s mother and Peter Derives were on a quest for truth regarding what happened that fateful morning and ... are very specific regarding the contents of the authorized warrant … I can only assume that their words were spoken from a foundation of knowledge

Janet

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


Translation - posted by Lazlo at RU
December 29, 2007


Bob Wit defends himself in Bon Dia

<snipped>

Mr Wit, had to decide in an instant about the search of where Joran's father lived, and made the decision to allow the search of the apartment of Joran van der Sloot and also in the two cars of the family.

At no moment they had (asked?) to search more then that. A Head Commisar cannot do otherwise, because the petition has to be substantial. Another word is by having allowed to search at other places that were not covered by the petition of the OM all evidence eventually obtained would be illegal. This is very significant since dealing with the case ourselves we had to work in a correct manner, Mr Wit says.

+++++++++++++++

http://scaredmonkeys.com/2005/10/10/beth-twitty-credibility-1-nay-sayers-0/

Gerold Dompig
October 10, 2005


Reporter: And the police only searched his apartment, deputy chief?

Dompig: That is correct. The fact is that we as a law enforcement agency always try to get the maximum. Meaning that we want to search as much places as possible. We were not granted by the judge a search warrant for the complete house, we only received the warrant for the apartment.

+++++++++++++++

Peter De Vries
On the Record w/ Greta
November 27, 2006


VAN SUSTEREN: What about the search of the van der Sloot property? Was that ever done, and was, you know--including, sort of, the cabana area where Joran lives?

DE VRIES: Well, the search in the home address of the family van der Sloot was very strange because the search warrant was made by head prosecutor Karin Janssen, and contained an allowance to search the whole address, “Montanja nineteen.” So, the gardens, the buildings--everything. But, when the police was on the spot, another high-ranking employee of the Justice office--it was Mr. Bob Wit--reduced the search warrant to only the room of Joran--and that was very strange.

+++++++++++++++

Beth Twitty
MARTHA MCCALLUM
November 28, 2006


TWITTY: Well I think they will always have to look at there were two personnel involved from the Aruban Justice Department and that is why we do not have any evidence and that is what Joran’s attorney will have to be reminded of. It is because of Bob Witt and Ben King stopped the search warrants. It was made to initially search the entire area of Mon. 19 - the garden, the buildings and everything but on the spot a high ranking employee of the Justice Office, Bob Witt, reduced the search warrant to only the room of Joran so that’s why we do not have any evidence because of involvement of the obstruction from the Aruban Justice Department personnel.

++++++++++++++


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 11, 2008, 07:32:18 PM
I see they posted my comment  :wink:

But most of it got cut off..:( They must have a limit of words per comment.

The key to solving this crime is the obvious cover up. Paul Van Der Sloot told people,is on tape and witnesses heard he had two contacts with natalee and picked her and joran up at  four AM. That was clearly understood by the Supreme Court of Aruba.

Since when do murder and kidnapping suspects get immunity from having there houses searched. Well Obvious Cover up and even last week Judge Wit said Commissioner Dompig Obstructed Justice and wanted the Van Der Sloots to have privacy from having there house searched. He said the prosecution never asked to search more than just Jorans small apartment. I could write a book about the obvious cover up with Paul Van Der sloots close friends and the Aruban Govt. Why are they allowed to change statements,obstruct juctice and sabotage a murder investigation? Why has the Cover up never been investigated?

Give 'em hell, *******!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Observer on January 11, 2008, 07:34:09 PM

I am  :wink: Rammstein is posting now over there..lol

Hans Mos was right about a few things..Like Natalee dying of a violent death and Paul Van Der SLoot being involved. But why could he not answer one question from Natalee's Family? Instead he told them that the American Media and Holloway Family hurt the Investigation..Are you kidding me? Just how deep does this cover up go?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 11, 2008, 07:39:10 PM

I am  :wink: Rammstein is posting now over there..lol

Hans Mos was right about a few things..Like Natalee dying of a violent death and Paul Van Der SLoot being involved. But why could he not answer one question from Natalee's Family? Instead he told them that the American Media and Holloway Family hurt the Investigation..Are you kidding me? Just how deep does this cover up go?

That was after Oduber came back from India.  He seemed confident he had
a case until then.  When Oduber came home Mos' whole attitude changed.
Oduber made the statement that he did not know the 3 were to be rearrested
and the whole case should be shut down so as not to hurt tourism any further.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: dennisintn on January 11, 2008, 07:41:35 PM
I see they posted my comment  :wink:

But most of it got cut off..:( They must have a limit of words per comment.

The key to solving this crime is the obvious cover up. Paul Van Der Sloot told people,is on tape and witnesses heard he had two contacts with natalee and picked her and joran up at  four AM. That was clearly understood by the Supreme Court of Aruba.

Since when do murder and kidnapping suspects get immunity from having there houses searched. Well Obvious Cover up and even last week Judge Wit said Commissioner Dompig Obstructed Justice and wanted the Van Der Sloots to have privacy from having there house searched. He said the prosecution never asked to search more than just Jorans small apartment. I could write a book about the obvious cover up with Paul Van Der sloots close friends and the Aruban Govt. Why are they allowed to change statements,obstruct juctice and sabotage a murder investigation? Why has the Cover up never been investigated?

So is Wit saying he didn't have to restrict the search because the prosecutor and Dompig never requested the search of the entire property?
that just flies in the face of dompig's saying that police always ask for the maximum to search but the judge didn't allow it.  too bad we'll never be able to get them in the same room together to ask questions like that.  i guess somebody could ask to see the search warrant itself and whether it was amended or not. maybe jqk could get things like that when he files for all the records in the case.
dennisintn



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 11, 2008, 07:42:34 PM
This cocky pimp (Joran) trying to make Peter apologize to him.  Who does he think he is?   Guess by not getting his apology he will now sue Peter.  And THEY believe this is over with now with this latest interview?  OH have we got a surprise for them!

I think the Van Der Sloots are becoming a family without a country as well as a concious or morals!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Observer on January 11, 2008, 07:45:02 PM
   
By Rammstein on 12-01-2008 at 01:33
Hey *******,
Do yourself a favour and go back to your cage at the bangge monkeys. Try not the people on the wrong track.

---------------------------------------------
Ahh Mr Spin Rammstein..Everything I say is 100% fact and you know it..Now go back to your hideout and defend Paul Van Der Sloot,Ben King and Aruban Torism like you normally do. I quote real info and you are the one that steers people from the truth.
Since when do Murder and Kidnapping suspects get immunity from having there houses searched?Mr De Vries?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Observer on January 11, 2008, 07:46:36 PM
   
Verdraaien of facts
By Rammstein on 12-01-2008 at 01:43
Hello ******* doe greetings to those other animals leugenachtige especially Klaas and Red course. Speculations is different from facts, but that is of course very difficult for you. Translate them!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 11, 2008, 07:48:29 PM
   
By Rammstein on 12-01-2008 at 01:33
Hey *******,
Do yourself a favour and go back to your cage at the bangge monkeys. Try not the people on the wrong track.

---------------------------------------------
Ahh Mr Spin Rammstein..Everything I say is 100% fact and you know it..Now go back to your hideout and defend Paul Van Der Sloot,Ben King and Aruban Torism like you normally do. I quote real info and you are the one that steers people from the truth.
Since when do Murder and Kidnapping suspects get immunity from having there houses searched?Mr De Vries?

That is exactly why I do not believe even half of what Rammstein has
told about Dutch Law.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 11, 2008, 07:50:49 PM
This cocky pimp (Joran) trying to make Peter apologize to him.  Who does he think he is?   Guess by not getting his apology he will now sue Peter.  And THEY believe this is over with now with this latest interview?  OH have we got a surprise for them!

I think the Van Der Sloots are becoming a family without a country as well as a concious or morals!

Morals have never played in this from the get-go.  You are correct they do appear to be without a country.  It is clear now why Paulus never became a judge.  He plays hard-ball with the justice system and one day it will back fire on him big time.  He of all people should have advised his son to tell the truth.  He of all people should have had the greatest respect for the Judicial system of Aruba.  But he didn't, all he could offer this family was to tell his son to SHUT UP.  What a loser.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 11, 2008, 07:54:35 PM
If Ramm is such an ordinary Dutch person how does he know all there is to know about the legal system?  The way it changes according to the situation how could he know it inside and out?  I always believed he was a Dutch legal person feeding us information and we were suppose to suck in all in.  Actually, I always thought he is Paulus.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Observer on January 11, 2008, 08:01:07 PM
If Ramm is such an ordinary Dutch person how does he know all there is to know about the legal system?  The way it changes according to the situation how could he know it inside and out?  I always believed he was a Dutch legal person feeding us information and we were suppose to suck in all in.  Actually, I always thought he is Paulus.

Just mention Ben King's crimes that he did to Mr.Matthews,Corrupt Dutch Judges,Aruban Tourism stats or any involvement of Paul Van Der Sloot and he will come running. He's related to someone,probably Ben King or the Van Der Sloots. He most certainlly is not your avg Dutch citizen with no ties to this case.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: JusticeforNatalee on January 11, 2008, 08:12:36 PM
Sure---Joran's cocky and brazen with Mommy and Daddy sitting nearby.

But it's Joran who isn't man enough. He wasn't man enough to take Natalee safely back to her hotel.

And he still isn't man enough to admit to his involvement in Natalee's disappearance and take his punishment like a man.

Instead he hides behind Mommy and Daddy and lets everyone else suffer--including Natalee's family and friends and the everyday citizens of Aruba. Joran doesn't care as long as HE doesn't have to go to prison.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: NM on January 11, 2008, 08:13:14 PM
That PR photo of pjvds look like they are in prisoners' outfits!

The reason I call it a PR photo is that we never saw any "family-type" photos of jvds until after Sept 2005 when Pauley and other's hooked up with the van der sluts. These PR photos are way different from the tickle site photos.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 11, 2008, 08:15:26 PM

Just mention Ben King's crimes that he did to Mr.Matthews,Corrupt Dutch Judges,Aruban Tourism stats or any involvement of Paul Van Der Sloot and he will come running. He's related to someone,probably Ben King or the Van Der Sloots. He most certainlly is not your avg Dutch citizen with no ties to this case.


 :lol:

Ramm has been a judical apologist from way back.  I do believe that he has been placed on the boards by the "powers that be" in Aruba to defend rulings in the Natalee Holloway case.  There was a time that Joran and Paulus were defended also but ... I took notice when he was posting on the SM forum that he did back down to some extend.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 11, 2008, 08:22:57 PM
Just got this Google Alert:

http://www.pr-inside.com:80/former-suspect-s-mother-wants-probe-into-r382954.htm

Former suspect's mother wants probe into Natalee Holloway investigation
 
© AP
2008-01-12 01:37:01 -


THE HAGUE, Netherlands (AP) - The mother of a former suspect in the disappearance of Natalee Holloway in Aruba said Friday in a television interview she hopes there will be an investigation into the investigation that failed to find a trace of the U.S. teenager since she vanished in 2005.

«I would like the investigation
to continue,» said Anita van der Sloot, mother of Joran van der Sloot, one of three youths extensively interrogated by police and prosecutors.
«I would also like to see an investigation into the investigation,» she added.
Joran, Anita and Paul van der Sloot appeared on the Dutch late-night talk show Pauw & Witteman in what was billed as the family's last television interview about the case.
Anita van der Sloot said her family, as well as Holloway's family, needed answers.
«I think it's also very important that for them _ for everybody, but particularly for them _ there has to be clarity,» she said. «Then we can move on. As long as that doesn't that happen, there will be questions, there will be fingers pointing at Joran.
Holloway went missing May 30, 2005, hours before she was to return home to the U.S. She was on the final night of her school graduation trip to the island.
Van der Sloot and two other suspects, brothers Deepak and Satish Kalpoe, were seen leaving a bar with Holloway on the night of her disappearance.
They were questioned early in the investigation and again late last year before being released when they refused to answer any questions. All three deny involvement in Holloway's disappearance.

Prosecutors now say they cannot prove a crime was committed without a body.
Extensive searches of the island turned up no trace of Holloway, who was 18 at the time of her disappearance, but the Aruban prosecutors have said they believe she is dead.
Authorities in Aruba say the case against the three could be reopened if additional evidence surfaces. But if they were to go to trial now with virtually no hope of guilty verdicts, they would lose the opportunity to try them later if strong evidence emerges.
Joran van der Sloot talked little during the show and made no new revelations about the case. When asked if he believed Holloway is still alive, he said he doubted it.
«If a person has been missing for three years, you would be a very bad person if you see everything that has gone on and don't come forward with a sign that you are alive,» he said. «And if she is still alive, I think she is being held somewhere against her will.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: NM on January 11, 2008, 08:24:32 PM
One more thing about that photo and the other PR photos. 

It is almost as if they are thinking about us here at SM and anyone who supports Natalee and her family, and adjust their expression and pose to act like-we-are-doing-great.

I bet they think of us and Natalee every second of the day and night.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Observer on January 11, 2008, 08:26:06 PM

 :lol:

Ramm has been a judical apologist from way back.  I do believe that he has been placed on the boards by the "powers that be" in Aruba to defend rulings in the Natalee Holloway case.  There was a time that Joran and Paulus were defended also but ... I took notice when he was posting on the SM forum that he did back down to some extend.

Janet
He know's defending Joran he will lose all credibility but Paul Van Der Sloot is another story.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Observer on January 11, 2008, 08:29:49 PM
Just got this Google Alert:

http://www.pr-inside.com:80/former-suspect-s-mother-wants-probe-into-r382954.htm

Former suspect's mother wants probe into Natalee Holloway investigation
:smt031 :cheers: :smt038 :smt041
It's the only way they will ever solve this case unless the persistence finds her.MO 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 11, 2008, 08:31:26 PM
DANA PRETZER SHOW TONIGHT:

The Dana Pretzer Show - Listen LIVE TONIGHT at 9PM Eastern - Guests Include
Dana Shafman, Cathy Wilson and Fred Rosen

Join dana this week as he welcomes:

    * Dana Shafman discusses the new idea of Taser Parties
    * Cathy Wilson, mother of missing person Matthew Wilson
    * Fred Rosen crime historian and author.



REMINDER - TONIGHT ON DANA PRETZER


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Sam on January 11, 2008, 08:32:40 PM
If Ramm is such an ordinary Dutch person how does he know all there is to know about the legal system?  The way it changes according to the situation how could he know it inside and out?  I always believed he was a Dutch legal person feeding us information and we were suppose to suck in all in.  Actually, I always thought he is Paulus.

Just mention Ben King's crimes that he did to Mr.Matthews,Corrupt Dutch Judges,Aruban Tourism stats or any involvement of Paul Van Der Sloot and he will come running. He's related to someone,probably Ben King or the Van Der Sloots. He most certainlly is not your avg Dutch citizen with no ties to this case.

I know this will not be a popular opinion here but it is my opinion.

I very much appreciate Ramms interpretations as well as his translations. I do not think he is related whatsoever to the Van der Sloots.

If he were he would defend them and he does not. He also does not defend Aruba and the way this case was treated. he does defend his home country just as most of us defend ours.

I see folks here who try to keep this forum for Justice for Natalee being shot down or criticized and it bothers me. I have never seen any post by Ramm where he made disparaging remarks about Natalee or her family. I was under the impression that is why we are all here is seeking Justice for Nat.

If you have never read Rammsteins site ,please take a look. I must admit his language is a little rough. Again just my opinion.

http://rammsteinsopinions.blogspot.com/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: dennisintn on January 11, 2008, 08:38:38 PM
Just got this Google Alert:

http://www.pr-inside.com:80/former-suspect-s-mother-wants-probe-into-r382954.htm

Former suspect's mother wants probe into Natalee Holloway investigation
 
© AP
2008-01-12 01:37:01 -


THE HAGUE, Netherlands (AP) - The mother of a former suspect in the disappearance of Natalee Holloway in Aruba said Friday in a television interview she hopes there will be an investigation into the investigation that failed to find a trace of the U.S. teenager since she vanished in 2005.

«I would like the investigation
to continue,» said Anita van der Sloot, mother of Joran van der Sloot, one of three youths extensively interrogated by police and prosecutors.
«I would also like to see an investigation into the investigation,» she added.
Joran, Anita and Paul van der Sloot appeared on the Dutch late-night talk show Pauw & Witteman in what was billed as the family's last television interview about the case.
Anita van der Sloot said her family, as well as Holloway's family, needed answers.
«I think it's also very important that for them _ for everybody, but particularly for them _ there has to be clarity,» she said. «Then we can move on. As long as that doesn't that happen, there will be questions, there will be fingers pointing at Joran.
Holloway went missing May 30, 2005, hours before she was to return home to the U.S. She was on the final night of her school graduation trip to the island.
Van der Sloot and two other suspects, brothers Deepak and Satish Kalpoe, were seen leaving a bar with Holloway on the night of her disappearance.
They were questioned early in the investigation and again late last year before being released when they refused to answer any questions. All three deny involvement in Holloway's disappearance.

Prosecutors now say they cannot prove a crime was committed without a body.
Extensive searches of the island turned up no trace of Holloway, who was 18 at the time of her disappearance, but the Aruban prosecutors have said they believe she is dead.
Authorities in Aruba say the case against the three could be reopened if additional evidence surfaces. But if they were to go to trial now with virtually no hope of guilty verdicts, they would lose the opportunity to try them later if strong evidence emerges.
Joran van der Sloot talked little during the show and made no new revelations about the case. When asked if he believed Holloway is still alive, he said he doubted it.
«If a person has been missing for three years, you would be a very bad person if you see everything that has gone on and don't come forward with a sign that you are alive,» he said. «And if she is still alive, I think she is being held somewhere against her will.



now, all of a sudden, she's putting her family in the same position as natalee's family?  horse apples, what an absolute crock of it.  i didn't think i could feel any more contempt for a group of people than i all ready did.  but now she's dropped to a level even beneath contempt.
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 11, 2008, 08:52:57 PM
Just got this Google Alert:

http://www.pr-inside.com:80/former-suspect-s-mother-wants-probe-into-r382954.htm

Former suspect's mother wants probe into Natalee Holloway investigation
 
© AP
2008-01-12 01:37:01 -


THE HAGUE, Netherlands (AP) - The mother of a former suspect in the disappearance of Natalee Holloway in Aruba said Friday in a television interview she hopes there will be an investigation into the investigation that failed to find a trace of the U.S. teenager since she vanished in 2005.

«I would like the investigation
to continue,» said Anita van der Sloot, mother of Joran van der Sloot, one of three youths extensively interrogated by police and prosecutors.
«I would also like to see an investigation into the investigation,» she added.
Joran, Anita and Paul van der Sloot appeared on the Dutch late-night talk show Pauw & Witteman in what was billed as the family's last television interview about the case.
Anita van der Sloot said her family, as well as Holloway's family, needed answers.
«I think it's also very important that for them _ for everybody, but particularly for them _ there has to be clarity,» she said. «Then we can move on. As long as that doesn't that happen, there will be questions, there will be fingers pointing at Joran.
Holloway went missing May 30, 2005, hours before she was to return home to the U.S. She was on the final night of her school graduation trip to the island.
Van der Sloot and two other suspects, brothers Deepak and Satish Kalpoe, were seen leaving a bar with Holloway on the night of her disappearance.
They were questioned early in the investigation and again late last year before being released when they refused to answer any questions. All three deny involvement in Holloway's disappearance.

Prosecutors now say they cannot prove a crime was committed without a body.
Extensive searches of the island turned up no trace of Holloway, who was 18 at the time of her disappearance, but the Aruban prosecutors have said they believe she is dead.
Authorities in Aruba say the case against the three could be reopened if additional evidence surfaces. But if they were to go to trial now with virtually no hope of guilty verdicts, they would lose the opportunity to try them later if strong evidence emerges.
Joran van der Sloot talked little during the show and made no new revelations about the case. When asked if he believed Holloway is still alive, he said he doubted it.
«If a person has been missing for three years, you would be a very bad person if you see everything that has gone on and don't come forward with a sign that you are alive,» he said. «And if she is still alive, I think she is being held somewhere against her will.




OK..I am going to PUKE!!!!!! This is so absolutely offensive!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 11, 2008, 08:55:27 PM
If Ramm is such an ordinary Dutch person how does he know all there is to know about the legal system?  The way it changes according to the situation how could he know it inside and out?  I always believed he was a Dutch legal person feeding us information and we were suppose to suck in all in.  Actually, I always thought he is Paulus.

Just mention Ben King's crimes that he did to Mr.Matthews,Corrupt Dutch Judges,Aruban Tourism stats or any involvement of Paul Van Der Sloot and he will come running. He's related to someone,probably Ben King or the Van Der Sloots. He most certainlly is not your avg Dutch citizen with no ties to this case.

I know this will not be a popular opinion here but it is my opinion.

I very much appreciate Ramms interpretations as well as his translations. I do not think he is related whatsoever to the Van der Sloots.

If he were he would defend them and he does not. He also does not defend Aruba and the way this case was treated. he does defend his home country just as most of us defend ours.

I see folks here who try to keep this forum for Justice for Natalee being shot down or criticized and it bothers me. I have never seen any post by Ramm where he made disparaging remarks about Natalee or her family. I was under the impression that is why we are all here is seeking Justice for Nat.

If you have never read Rammsteins site ,please take a look. I must admit his language is a little rough. Again just my opinion.

http://rammsteinsopinions.blogspot.com/

I was so suspicious of Ramm..but I have had a chance to chat a little with him via pm's I think he is on the up and up and though he drives us nuts sometimes..lol..I think his heart now is in the right place.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 11, 2008, 08:59:02 PM
Sure---Joran's cocky and brazen with Mommy and Daddy sitting nearby.

But it's Joran who isn't man enough. He wasn't man enough to take Natalee safely back to her hotel.

And he still isn't man enough to admit to his involvement in Natalee's disappearance and take his punishment like a man.

Instead he hides behind Mommy and Daddy and lets everyone else suffer--including Natalee's family and friends and the everyday citizens of Aruba. Joran doesn't care as long as HE doesn't have to go to prison.

He is an arrogant little sexually confused punk, who apparently needs his ass kicked, and kicked, and kicked.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 11, 2008, 09:06:28 PM
I agree PI. I remember when my older sister made a mistake in her youth, and my parents found out about it. They sat her down and said we will back you 100% in correcting this mistake, but if you don't go to the authorities, we will. You have to face the consequences. That had to be one of the hardest things my parents ever did because she could have faced jail time!! But they went to the authorities, and my sister had to acknowledge her part and do what it took to correct it!!!
By the way...today my sister is happily married and the mother of 6 fantastic kids and doing fine!!! lol
Parents have to teach their children to take responsibility for their actions, not cover for them!!

ldstlou ... my husband and I were put in a similar situation with our eldest son when he was in his late teens.  We discovered that he had submitted a false claim to an insurance company in regards to wheels that were allegedly stolen from his precious Datsun 510.

We reported our findings to his insurance adjuster while he was at school.  If thoughts could kill ... Tamikosmom would not be posting on the Natalee Holloway case today.

Why was his Dad and I suspicious?  This had been drooling for three months over fancy wheels advertised in a catalog ... fancy wheels he knew darn well he could not afford.  We suspected that he anticipated an insurance settlement would go a long ways towards the purchase of those wheels.  We were right.   :wink:

Janet


Parenting is so hard...well GOOD parenting at least. Great job!!!
I always tell my little guy being brave does not mean you don't get scared, being brave means you are scared but you do the right thing despite your fear.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 11, 2008, 09:06:33 PM
If Mr. Rammstein is such a lovely person, why would he be ugly
to ******* on a Dutch Blog?  ******* was only stating facts.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 11, 2008, 09:09:06 PM
If you're listening to Dana Pretzer right now, he is talking with the woman who has the Taser Parties - pretty interresting.  Come over to Musing to discuss tonights Dana Pretzer show.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: crazybabyborg on January 11, 2008, 09:11:12 PM
Sure---Joran's cocky and brazen with Mommy and Daddy sitting nearby.

But it's Joran who isn't man enough. He wasn't man enough to take Natalee safely back to her hotel.

And he still isn't man enough to admit to his involvement in Natalee's disappearance and take his punishment like a man.

Instead he hides behind Mommy and Daddy and lets everyone else suffer--including Natalee's family and friends and the everyday citizens of Aruba. Joran doesn't care as long as HE doesn't have to go to prison.

He is an arrogant little sexually confused punk, who apparently needs his ass kicked, and kicked, and kicked.

 :lol: I'd love to be the one to do it! I hate all the mileage that Anita gets out of spinning their story. They've gotten far enough away from the incident to be able to point to the undeniably botched and orchestrated cover-up and use it, again, to their advantage. In the meantime, Natalee Holloway is dead and her family is devastated, with no closure, and only questions. Justice is as elusive as the tooth fairy. BOYCOTT ARUBA!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 11, 2008, 09:12:07 PM

Oh, not only are they hitting her with stones, they are doing it maliciously and with as much psychological damage as they can muster to try and bring her down ie: the latest being committed over the holidays as though the holidays aren't tough enough for Beth and the Family to get through!!
That's ok Aruba, Beth will strike back on Oprah, and her words will reach millions of ears. And although the refugees laughed the last time I said this, I will say it again so you get a taste of Beth's retaliation. Beth's words will be heard by MILLIONS!!! and they will tell a friend and they will tell a friend...and so on and so on!!!
Can't wait to see Aruba's tourism numbers this year...can we say..TANKED!!!
From your lips (or fingers) to God's ears :lol:

Amen!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 11, 2008, 09:14:32 PM
Google Translated page:

 Tonight in Pauw & Witteman: Joran van der Sloot and his parents Paul and Anita and crime reporter Peter R. de Vries over de zaak Natalee Holloway De Vries on the case of Natalee Holloway

http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=nl&u=http://pauwenwitteman.vara.nl/&sa=X&oi=translate&resnum=1&ct=result&prev=/search%3Fq%3D%2522%2BPauw%2B%2526%2BWitteman%2B%2522%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DG

ok...this is actually kind of funny...if this is the sloots "answer" to Beth doing the Oprah show...I think its safe to say that one didn't work!!! :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 11, 2008, 09:16:38 PM
Sure---Joran's cocky and brazen with Mommy and Daddy sitting nearby.

But it's Joran who isn't man enough. He wasn't man enough to take Natalee safely back to her hotel.

And he still isn't man enough to admit to his involvement in Natalee's disappearance and take his punishment like a man.

Instead he hides behind Mommy and Daddy and lets everyone else suffer--including Natalee's family and friends and the everyday citizens of Aruba. Joran doesn't care as long as HE doesn't have to go to prison.

He is an arrogant little sexually confused punk, who apparently needs his ass kicked, and kicked, and kicked.

castrated too


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 11, 2008, 09:17:22 PM
This is from Pauw & Witteman 7-12-07 (Not tonights live show)
http://player.omroep.nl/?aflID=6010887&start=0:01:06

(http://img233.imageshack.us/img233/8568/joranandpapavn9.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)


Thank you *******. Nice job.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: crazybabyborg on January 11, 2008, 09:20:19 PM
This is from Pauw & Witteman 7-12-07 (Not tonights live show)
http://player.omroep.nl/?aflID=6010887&start=0:01:06

(http://img233.imageshack.us/img233/8568/joranandpapavn9.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)


Thank you *******. Nice job.

That gives me chills. It makes me wonder if I'm not looking at the last faces Natalee saw.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 11, 2008, 09:24:44 PM
This is from Pauw & Witteman 7-12-07 (Not tonights live show)
http://player.omroep.nl/?aflID=6010887&start=0:01:06

(http://img233.imageshack.us/img233/8568/joranandpapavn9.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)


Thank you *******. Nice job.

That gives me chills. It makes me wonder if I'm not looking at the last faces Natalee saw.

Oh, CBB, you are so right.  What a terrible thought.  It makes that photo
even more frightening.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: San on January 11, 2008, 09:33:50 PM
This is from Pauw & Witteman 7-12-07 (Not tonights live show)
http://player.omroep.nl/?aflID=6010887&start=0:01:06

(http://img233.imageshack.us/img233/8568/joranandpapavn9.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)


Thank you *******. Nice job.

That gives me chills. It makes me wonder if I'm not looking at the last faces Natalee saw.

Oh, CBB, you are so right.  What a terrible thought.  It makes that photo
even more frightening.

Paulus is either stoned, drunk or forgot to take his meds.

Yes I believe these are the two faces Natalee ever saw.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: jackb on January 11, 2008, 09:34:15 PM
   
By Rammstein on 12-01-2008 at 01:33
Hey *******,
Do yourself a favour and go back to your cage at the bangge monkeys. Try not the people on the wrong track.

---------------------------------------------
Ahh Mr Spin Rammstein..Everything I say is 100% fact and you know it..Now go back to your hideout and defend Paul Van Der Sloot,Ben King and Aruban Torism like you normally do. I quote real info and you are the one that steers people from the truth.
Since when do Murder and Kidnapping suspects get immunity from having there houses searched?Mr De Vries?

That is exactly why I do not believe even half of what Rammstein has
told about Dutch Law.

Either he is mistaken or he is so moon struck by officialdom he cannot see for looking.
Jack blue.   PS:  Why does it take so long to turn pages and post or move on here?  I am on the East coast, is that part of the reason? 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 11, 2008, 09:38:23 PM
This is from Pauw & Witteman 7-12-07 (Not tonights live show)
http://player.omroep.nl/?aflID=6010887&start=0:01:06

(http://img233.imageshack.us/img233/8568/joranandpapavn9.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)


Thank you *******. Nice job.

That gives me chills. It makes me wonder if I'm not looking at the last faces Natalee saw.

Oh, CBB, you are so right.  What a terrible thought.  It makes that photo
even more frightening.

ok...I have a case of extreme willies now.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Observer on January 11, 2008, 09:48:15 PM
   
By Rammstein on 12-01-2008 at 01:33
Hey *******,
Do yourself a favour and go back to your cage at the bangge monkeys. Try not the people on the wrong track.

---------------------------------------------
Ahh Mr Spin Rammstein..Everything I say is 100% fact and you know it..Now go back to your hideout and defend Paul Van Der Sloot,Ben King and Aruban Torism like you normally do. I quote real info and you are the one that steers people from the truth.
Since when do Murder and Kidnapping suspects get immunity from having there houses searched?Mr De Vries?

That is exactly why I do not believe even half of what Rammstein has
told about Dutch Law.

Either he is mistaken or he is so moon struck by officialdom he cannot see for looking.
Jack blue.   PS:  Why does it take so long to turn pages and post or move on here?  I am on the East coast, is that part of the reason? 

Hi Jack,

I have been having problems with the forum as well. I'll talk to Dugga again and see if he can spot the problem.

As far as Ramm is concerened I meant everything I said. I have caught him one too many times distorting the facts,defending PVDS and distorting the truth,derailing travel show threads,defending outrageous decisions by Dutch Judges..etc but most oddly he gets fighting mad when Aruban Tourism stats are talked about or Mr Matthews who was badly mistreated by the likes of Ben King,Rudy Croes and PVDS. He even had his own anti say no to aruban boycott site. He will have a hard time convincing people I am a Anti Natalee supporter and Newspaper reports,statements and court decisions are speculation like he claims.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Rammstein on January 11, 2008, 09:57:55 PM
FYI, I have never in all of my life posted anything on the website of Pauw and Witteman, it seems someone from a pro-Joran website seems to like to "screw" with *******'s head, something he fell for hook line and sinker. I have never spoken negatively over Klaasend or Red.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Observer on January 11, 2008, 09:59:52 PM
FYI, I have never in all of my life posted anything on the website of Pauw and Witteman, it seems someone from a pro-Joran website seems to like to "screw" with *******'s head, something he fell for hook line and sinker. I have never spoken negatively over Klaasend or Red.

Ok thanks for clearing that up  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 11, 2008, 10:01:48 PM
FYI, I have never in all of my life posted anything on the website of Pauw and Witteman, it seems someone from a pro-Joran website seems to like to "screw" with *******'s head, something he fell for hook line and sinker. I have never spoken negatively over Klaasend or Red.

Thanks Ramm - I suspected it wasn't you  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Rammstein on January 11, 2008, 10:07:11 PM
FYI, I have never in all of my life posted anything on the website of Pauw and Witteman, it seems someone from a pro-Joran website seems to like to "screw" with *******'s head, something he fell for hook line and sinker. I have never spoken negatively over Klaasend or Red.

Thanks Ramm - I suspected it wasn't you  :wink:

if I were a speculating man I would suspect it came for a site like Refugees but as I am not that kind of a guy I will have to say that I haven't got the foggiest who would do such a thing  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 11, 2008, 10:12:43 PM
FYI, I have never in all of my life posted anything on the website of Pauw and Witteman, it seems someone from a pro-Joran website seems to like to "screw" with *******'s head, something he fell for hook line and sinker. I have never spoken negatively over Klaasend or Red.

Thanks Ramm - I suspected it wasn't you  :wink:

if I were a speculating man I would suspect it came for a site like Refugees but as I am not that kind of a guy I will have to say that I haven't got the foggiest who would do such a thing  :wink:

I agree.  Sounds like something maybe lil shango might do just for fun.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 11, 2008, 10:21:18 PM
This is from Pauw & Witteman 7-12-07 (Not tonights live show)
http://player.omroep.nl/?aflID=6010887&start=0:01:06

(http://img233.imageshack.us/img233/8568/joranandpapavn9.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)


Thank you *******. Nice job.

That gives me chills. It makes me wonder if I'm not looking at the last faces Natalee saw.

Oh, CBB, you are so right.  What a terrible thought.  It makes that photo
even more frightening.

ok...I have a case of extreme willies now.

I hate sound like a pervert but those two look more like lovers than father and son.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 11, 2008, 10:30:26 PM
When people need help, all you have to do is ask and I can switch it for you.  Just did  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 11, 2008, 10:37:16 PM
Wondering if Rammstein watched the show with the VDS's...and any comments...

I may not be online much longer, therefore no response may not necessarily mean 'no manners'.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 11, 2008, 10:40:56 PM
Wondering if Rammstein watched the show with the VDS's...and any comments...

I may not be online much longer, therefore no response may not necessarily mean 'no manners'.

I'm not Ramm but I did read he posted at BFN that he only caught the tail end of the show.  It will be online tomorrow and Ramm said he'd watch the entire thing then.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 11, 2008, 10:52:20 PM
Wondering if Rammstein watched the show with the VDS's...and any comments...

I may not be online much longer, therefore no response may not necessarily mean 'no manners'.

I'm not Ramm but I did read he posted at BFN that he only caught the tail end of the show.  It will be online tomorrow and Ramm said he'd watch the entire thing then.

Thanks...I meant no response from me, btw....I know I have a tendency to think one thing and say something less.

G'night, all.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: dennisintn on January 11, 2008, 10:56:47 PM
Wondering if Rammstein watched the show with the VDS's...and any comments...

I may not be online much longer, therefore no response may not necessarily mean 'no manners'.

I'm not Ramm but I did read he posted at BFN that he only caught the tail end of the show.  It will be online tomorrow and Ramm said he'd watch the entire thing then.

Thanks...I meant no response from me, btw....I know I have a tendency to think one thing and say something less.

G'night, all.
roflmfao, 2njsons, that's a hell of a lot better than people that think one thing and say a whole lot more.
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 11, 2008, 10:56:55 PM
Nite 2NJ - I knew what you meant  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 11, 2008, 11:01:04 PM
When people need help, all you have to do is ask and I can switch it for you.  Just did  :wink:

I appreciate you. I just thought I might be a Chinese restaurant until next Christmas with my old avatar:)))))))))


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 11, 2008, 11:08:51 PM
Posted by Victor (Lazlo) at Scrux:

There was an agreement with Joran/VDS's that de Vries would not be allowed interrupt, that they would be given the opportunity to tell their entire story and Peter could have his say áfter that.

But things went differently.

I am very convinced Peter de Vries wil continue to pursue this case.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 11, 2008, 11:09:27 PM
When people need help, all you have to do is ask and I can switch it for you.  Just did  :wink:

I appreciate you. I just thought I might be a Chinese restaurant until next Christmas with my old avatar:)))))))))

 :lol: :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 11, 2008, 11:41:29 PM
Posted by Victor (Lazlo) at Scrux:

There was an agreement with Joran/VDS's that de Vries would not be allowed interrupt, that they would be given the opportunity to tell their entire story and Peter could have his say áfter that.

But things went differently.

I am very convinced Peter de Vries wil continue to pursue this case.

too bad Peter de Vries didn't prosecute the case!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Altruist on January 11, 2008, 11:48:35 PM
Mr. DeVries again represents himself well to show his viewers that this family is one so lacking in character, yet they have the female pontificating as if she cares for Natalee Holloway's family, NOT.  These Slootscums think everybody is a bunch of suckers that they can capitalize on, for sure there will be very little interest in anything these dishonest try to perpetrate in commercial print.

Mr. DeVries sounds to have similar traits to Mike Wallace, another truth speaker journalist who is interested in presenting the whole story, not a convoluted fairy tale.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Observer on January 12, 2008, 12:58:29 AM
(http://img212.imageshack.us/img212/2499/mansurtf2.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 12, 2008, 01:21:46 AM
Same article in Amigoe:

http://www.amigoe.com/artman/publish/artikel_38576.php

(http://www.amigoe.com/artman/uploads/01-11-proforma-mansur.jpg)
Eleven suspected among which matter man luis Mansur (nearly invisibly in the middle) appeared vanochtend for the judge. Photograph: Cybmed

Bende Mansur voor de rechter
11 Jan, 2008, 18:37 (GMT -04:00)


ORANJESTAD — De 63-jarige zakenman Luis Mansur en tien andere verdachten zijn vanochtend voor de rechter verschenen. Zij worden verdacht van deelneming aan een criminele organisatie die zich bezig hield met de internationale handel in verdovende middelen, in het bijzonder de in- en uitvoer van cocaïne en heroïne.

Daarnaast wordt de organisatie verdacht van afpersing, vuurwapenbezit en het witwassen van crimineel geld. Mansur wordt bovendien verdacht van het smokkelen van cocaïne naar Aruba in de periode 1 januari 2001 tot zijn aanhouding op 24 september vorig jaar. Hij zou ook vanaf mei 2005 drugstransporten hebben voorbereid van Venezuela naar de Dominicaanse Republiek en/of vanuit Zuid-Amerika naar Europa en de Verenigde Staten. De zakenman schoot tijdens zijn arrestatie met een vuurwapen. Naar eigen zeggen, omdat hij dacht dat hij werd overvallen. Het Openbaar Ministerie denkt daar anders over, blijkt uit de dagvaarding waarin Mansur ook aangeklaagd wordt voor het schieten op de arresterende agenten.

Het ging vanochtend om een pro forma zitting. De inhoudelijke behandelingen van de strafzaken vinden plaats op 1 februari waarin vier verdachten terecht staan en op 18 april waar Mansur en de rest van de verdachten moeten voorkomen. De advocaat van de verdachte M.O. vroeg om een schorsing omdat er onvoldoende bewijs was tegen zijn cliënt. De officier van de justitie was het daar niet meer eens. De rechter vroeg meer tijd en neemt daarover aankomende dinsdag een beslissing.


Through translator:

Gang Mansur for judge
11 Jan, 2008, 18.37 (GMT -04:00)

ORANJESTAD - the 63 person whose birthday it is matter man luis Mansur and suspected ten other its vanochtend for the judge appeared. They become suspicious participation to a criminal organisation which busy loved himself with the international trade in narcotic substances, in particular in - and export of cocaine and heroin.

Moreover becomes the organisation suspected of extortion, fire weapon possession and laundering criminal money. Mansur become moreover previous year suspected of smuggling cocaine to Aruba in the period 1 January 2001 to its adjournment on 24 September. He will have prepared drug transports also as from May 2005 of venezuela to the Dominican republic and/or from zuid-Amerika to Europe and the United States. The matter man shot during its arrest with a fire weapon. To own say, because he thought that he was assaulted. The Public Prosecution Service thinks about that differently, becomes clear from the intimation in which Mansur are also accused for shooting on the arresting agents.

It concerned vanochtend a pro forma meeting. The substantive treatment of the criminal matters takes place on 1 February in which four suspected stand trial and on 18 April where Mansur and the rest of suspected must prevent. The lawyer of the suspected M.O. asked for a suspension because there was insufficient proof against its customer. The officer of the justice was it there no longer once. The judge asked more time and takes about that arriving Tuesday a decision.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: texasmom on January 12, 2008, 02:09:26 AM
I have been over at the Oprah website writing a book in response to one of the idiotic posts and needed to edit, pressed "cancel" by mistake and erased the entire thing.  When will I ever learn to save a copy on word before I do ANYTHING else... :2doh:I'm just sick because I'll have to go back and do it all over again.  I'd gained momentum from ******* earlier in the evening, I hope I can actually post one later that will get close to the one I just finished. :gaah:
 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: sirensong on January 12, 2008, 02:26:32 AM
  Oh, Texasmom, I'm sorry that happened to you.    :smt056  I have done that so many times myself.  I know how upsetting it is! 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Observer on January 12, 2008, 02:51:08 AM
I have been over at the Oprah website writing a book in response to one of the idiotic posts and needed to edit, pressed "cancel" by mistake and erased the entire thing.  When will I ever learn to save a copy on word before I do ANYTHING else... :2doh:I'm just sick because I'll have to go back and do it all over again.  I'd gained momentum from ******* earlier in the evening, I hope I can actually post one later that will get close to the one I just finished. :gaah:
 

I feel your pain TM :( I lost many good posts on the FP when when 1+1 didn't =2..Let them know whats up TM..The show on Oprah is gonna be big! Estimated 23 million viewers!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: texasmom on January 12, 2008, 03:09:52 AM
thanks for the encouragment, I WILL have my say, no matter how many times I have to type it!   :oops:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Peaches on January 12, 2008, 05:54:38 AM
Joran targeted her.

If it was just an accident - no need to cover it up.
NO FORGIVENESS UNTIL THEY ARE IN PRISON FOR THEIR CRIMES AGAINST AN AMERICAN TOURIST - PERIOD AND
ALL THOSE INVOLVED IN THE OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE!

i'm standing shoulder to shoulder with you on this, kermit.
dennisintn

Both of you are the type of people everyone would like to have stand with them during a crisis. Unwavering, firm, and committed. I know Beth appreciates you.


Maybe Joran will save his own parents and do teach them that truth is honor, truth is redemption.
The alternative is hell.

Kiss from the frog to Miss Beth.




The real perversion of the case is that I am not sure that it isn't Joran covering up his Dad's actions!!!

You're not the Lone Ranger in that final thought, PI.  I have always felt like PVDS was in this way deeper than anyone else.  Maybe the "your own father" comment from Deepak refers to the fact "your own father" let JVDS go to jail to save his own butt.  JVDS, just another punk, sticks out in a crowd only because he's built like Lurch.  What if we've been concentrating on the son and he was not the ultimately responsible party? 

Good morning.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Buckeye on January 12, 2008, 07:43:25 AM
If I have my translation correct....seems that when the cameras quit rolling, Joran threw wine (or water) into the face of DeVries. 

Jeroen Pauw kondigde het programma af, het beeld schakelde over naar het NOS-journaal en toen gebeurde het.
Op mijn Twitter verscheen een bericht van Corrie Gerritsma:
"camera stopt en joran gooit peter r de vries een glas wijn in zijn gezicht"
Ik dacht even dat ze een grapje maakte en twitterde terug:
":-) en vervolgens ontkent hij dat"
Maar het bleek echt zo te zijn. Corrie zat in de studio en zag het gebeuren.
Hier doet ze verslag, compleet met foto van de confrontatie na afloop: "Zodra de live-uitzending stopte en de camera's uit gingen, stond hij op en gooide een glas wijn (water?) in het gezicht van Peter R. de Vries. Paniek. De Vries riep dat het zo prikte in zijn ogen, zijn vrouw haalde water. Joran was snel uit de studio verdwenen met zijn vader, en het publiek zei oh en ah en waarom in hemelsnaam?"
En zo mislukte een pr-stunt dan toch nog. Door Joran zelf.
Op de foto, het laatste beeld van de uitzending. Zie hier de foto van Corrie.
Update: Reportage op Radio 1 journaal met reacties Peter R de Vries ("raar slot") en Paul Witteman ("afschuwelijk"). Verslaggever was ter plekke in de studio aanwezig. Joran weigerde commentaar. Luister hier.


Jeroen Peacock proclaimed connected the program, the image over to the NOS-journal and then it happened.  On my Twitter appeared a message of Corrie Gerritsma:  "Camera stops and joran throws godfather r the freeze a glass of wine in its face" I thought just that she a joke made and twitterde back:  ": -) and then denies he that"

But the pale real so to be.  Corrie sat in the studio and saw the event. 

Here she does report, completely with photograph of the confrontation after result:  "As soon as the live-broadcast stopped and the cameras out went, stood he on and threw a glass of wine (water?) in the face of Godfather R. the Freeze.  Panic.  The Freeze mentioned that it so pricked in its eyes, its woman got water.  Was Joran fast disappeared from the studio with its father, and the public oh said and ah and why in heavenly name?" 

And so failed a pr-stunt then really yet.  Through Joran self. 

On the photograph, the last image of the broadcast.  See here the photograph of Corrie. 

Update:  Reportage on Radio 1 journal with reactions Godfather R the Freeze ("odd end") and Paul Witteman ("awfully").  Reporter was to spot in the studio person present.  Joran refused comment.  Listen here. 

http://www.2525.com/log/archives/2008/01/joran_gooit_pet.html


DeVries comments here (in Dutch)

http://player.nos.nl/index.php/media/play/tcmid/tcm:5-343390/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 12, 2008, 07:56:03 AM
FYI, I have never in all of my life posted anything on the website of Pauw and Witteman, it seems someone from a pro-Joran website seems to like to "screw" with *******'s head, something he fell for hook line and sinker. I have never spoken negatively over Klaasend or Red.

Thanks Ramm - I suspected it wasn't you  :wink:

if I were a speculating man I would suspect it came for a site like Refugees but as I am not that kind of a guy I will have to say that I haven't got the foggiest who would do such a thing  :wink:

mmmmmmmmmmmm............
I smell a 'Reality' check!!!!!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Peaches on January 12, 2008, 08:14:28 AM
JVDS behaving badly once the cameras are off.  Who would have thought? :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 12, 2008, 08:22:07 AM
Posted by Victor (Lazlo) at Scrux:

There was an agreement with Joran/VDS's that de Vries would not be allowed interrupt, that they would be given the opportunity to tell their entire story and Peter could have his say áfter that.

But things went differently.

I am very convinced Peter de Vries wil continue to pursue this case.

too bad Peter de Vries didn't prosecute the case!



I 2nd that one!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 12, 2008, 08:23:40 AM
FYI, I have never in all of my life posted anything on the website of Pauw and Witteman, it seems someone from a pro-Joran website seems to like to "screw" with *******'s head, something he fell for hook line and sinker. I have never spoken negatively over Klaasend or Red.

Thanks Ramm - I suspected it wasn't you  :wink:

if I were a speculating man I would suspect it came for a site like Refugees but as I am not that kind of a guy I will have to say that I haven't got the foggiest who would do such a thing  :wink:

mmmmmmmmmmmm............
I smell a 'Reality' check!!!!!!!!

Told ya Ramm was on the good side. Glad you cleared that up Ramm!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 12, 2008, 08:26:15 AM
If I have my translation correct....seems that when the cameras quit rolling, Joran threw wine (or water) into the face of DeVries. 

Jeroen Pauw kondigde het programma af, het beeld schakelde over naar het NOS-journaal en toen gebeurde het.
Op mijn Twitter verscheen een bericht van Corrie Gerritsma:
"camera stopt en joran gooit peter r de vries een glas wijn in zijn gezicht"
Ik dacht even dat ze een grapje maakte en twitterde terug:
":-) en vervolgens ontkent hij dat"
Maar het bleek echt zo te zijn. Corrie zat in de studio en zag het gebeuren.
Hier doet ze verslag, compleet met foto van de confrontatie na afloop: "Zodra de live-uitzending stopte en de camera's uit gingen, stond hij op en gooide een glas wijn (water?) in het gezicht van Peter R. de Vries. Paniek. De Vries riep dat het zo prikte in zijn ogen, zijn vrouw haalde water. Joran was snel uit de studio verdwenen met zijn vader, en het publiek zei oh en ah en waarom in hemelsnaam?"
En zo mislukte een pr-stunt dan toch nog. Door Joran zelf.
Op de foto, het laatste beeld van de uitzending. Zie hier de foto van Corrie.
Update: Reportage op Radio 1 journaal met reacties Peter R de Vries ("raar slot") en Paul Witteman ("afschuwelijk"). Verslaggever was ter plekke in de studio aanwezig. Joran weigerde commentaar. Luister hier.


Jeroen Peacock proclaimed connected the program, the image over to the NOS-journal and then it happened.  On my Twitter appeared a message of Corrie Gerritsma:  "Camera stops and joran throws godfather r the freeze a glass of wine in its face" I thought just that she a joke made and twitterde back:  ": -) and then denies he that"

But the pale real so to be.  Corrie sat in the studio and saw the event. 

Here she does report, completely with photograph of the confrontation after result:  "As soon as the live-broadcast stopped and the cameras out went, stood he on and threw a glass of wine (water?) in the face of Godfather R. the Freeze.  Panic.  The Freeze mentioned that it so pricked in its eyes, its woman got water.  Was Joran fast disappeared from the studio with its father, and the public oh said and ah and why in heavenly name?" 

And so failed a pr-stunt then really yet.  Through Joran self. 

On the photograph, the last image of the broadcast.  See here the photograph of Corrie. 

Update:  Reportage on Radio 1 journal with reactions Godfather R the Freeze ("odd end") and Paul Witteman ("awfully").  Reporter was to spot in the studio person present.  Joran refused comment.  Listen here. 

http://www.2525.com/log/archives/2008/01/joran_gooit_pet.html


DeVries comments here (in Dutch)

http://player.nos.nl/index.php/media/play/tcmid/tcm:5-343390/


Is that joran wearing what looks to be army fatig :roll:ues and a baseball hat?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 12, 2008, 08:27:21 AM
WHOA!! I blew that on..lol...fatigues.
Need another cup of coffee!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 12, 2008, 08:29:38 AM
This is from Pauw & Witteman 7-12-07 (Not tonights live show)
http://player.omroep.nl/?aflID=6010887&start=0:01:06

(http://img233.imageshack.us/img233/8568/joranandpapavn9.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)


Thank you *******. Nice job.

That gives me chills. It makes me wonder if I'm not looking at the last faces Natalee saw.

Oh, CBB, you are so right.  What a terrible thought.  It makes that photo
even more frightening.

ok...I have a case of extreme willies now.

I hate sound like a pervert but those two look more like lovers than father and son.

roflmao!!!!! too funny!!! and true now that you mention it!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Buckeye on January 12, 2008, 08:29:40 AM
From Jos at BFN...thanks

Interview with Paul Witteman (talk show host) and Peter de Vries after the incident. You can find it here

http://player.nos.nl/index.php/media/play/tcmid/tcm:5-343390/

Content in a few words:

Peter did not see it coming, he did not see Joran throwing the glass, but afterwords he could not see and it hurted. This behavior is in contradiction with what the parents told during the show, namely that Joran is a decent boy with good manners and he has overcome his problems and has his emotons under control now. This behavior shows the opposite.

Paul says that Anita was very angry at Joran, because he just did the opposite from what she had been saying all night long (Joran ran out of the studio, Paul followed and Anita stayed behind to talk to the hosts and Peter). Goal of the program was to let Joran talk and to bring about a discussion between him and Peter. Now Joran has been acquitted, there is not reason left for not doing it.

Question to Paul: it seemed you defended Joran so much. Paul says that is not being prosecuted now and Peter said too much on the show that he is a liar. Peter also couldn't come up with substantial material that would be able to prosecute Joran.

Paul called the program spicy though decent but was shocked by the end of it. His words were "dramatic/unbelievable/horrible" and "very stupid", for this is a proof Joran does not have his emotions under control and the speculation will go on.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: wreck on January 12, 2008, 08:31:07 AM
Nice thinkin', Joran!! I bet Devries will really support you now!!! :roll: :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: wreck on January 12, 2008, 08:34:25 AM
I know we have discussed this -- but how is Devries "perceived" in The Netherlands? Is he more like Geraldo or more like Mike Wallace?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 12, 2008, 08:37:12 AM
From Jos at BFN...thanks

Interview with Paul Witteman (talk show host) and Peter de Vries after the incident. You can find it here

http://player.nos.nl/index.php/media/play/tcmid/tcm:5-343390/

Content in a few words:

Peter did not see it coming, he did not see Joran throwing the glass, but afterwords he could not see and it hurted. This behavior is in contradiction with what the parents told during the show, namely that Joran is a decent boy with good manners and he has overcome his problems and has his emotons under control now. This behavior shows the opposite.

Paul says that Anita was very angry at Joran, because he just did the opposite from what she had been saying all night long (Joran ran out of the studio, Paul followed and Anita stayed behind to talk to the hosts and Peter). Goal of the program was to let Joran talk and to bring about a discussion between him and Peter. Now Joran has been acquitted, there is not reason left for not doing it.

Question to Paul: it seemed you defended Joran so much. Paul says that is not being prosecuted now and Peter said too much on the show that he is a liar. Peter also couldn't come up with substantial material that would be able to prosecute Joran.

Paul called the program spicy though decent but was shocked by the end of it. His words were "dramatic/unbelievable/horrible" and "very stupid", for this is a proof Joran does not have his emotions under control and the speculation will go on.

Of this is just too rich!!!! roflmao!!! These 3 together are like National Lampoon Vacation!!! So much for telling their "story" before Beth does!!! hahahahahahahahahahahaha


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 12, 2008, 08:39:51 AM
I wish Oprah would include some of yesterdays interview including the photo of the water tossing and an interview of those commentators thoughts after the interview to provide an independent editorial from Jorans own home country as to their thoughts on the case. Let Joran's peers provide an unbiased comment on him and the treatment of him by the Dutch system in Aruba.

Maybe have Dr. Phil offer to treat Joran for anger management, do a makeover to show Anita how to hide those udders with fabric you can't see thru and advise Paulus that he can buy zipperless pull up pants.

 Can you imagine Joran's response to discipline from Poopa and Anudder?

 Do you reckon he would throw something at or hit a girl or boy who told him no?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Buckeye on January 12, 2008, 08:40:34 AM
I know we have discussed this -- but how is Devries "perceived" in The Netherlands? Is he more like Geraldo or more like Mike Wallace?

If memory serves me correctly....Wallace before the documentary and Geraldo after...no sorry, that was RUs perception.

From what I've read, most feel he is a real investigative reporter, does not back down and is not afraid to take on police corruption.  MO, after some of his investigations, Joran  would be a piece of cake....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 12, 2008, 08:41:48 AM
I wish Oprah would include some of yesterdays interview including the photo of the water tossing and an interview of those commentators thoughts after the interview to provide an independent editorial from Jorans own home country as to their thoughts on the case. Let Joran's peers provide an unbiased comment on him and the treatment of him by the Dutch system in Aruba.

Maybe have Dr. Phil offer to treat Joran for anger management, do a makeover to show Anita how to hide those udders with fabric you can't see thru and advise Paulus that he can buy zipperless pull up pants.

 Can you imagine Joran's response to discipline from Poopa and Anudder?

 Do you reckon he would throw something at or hit a girl or boy who told him no?
I missed the photo, did he throw the glass or water? Do men throw water at people? hahahahaha roflmao AGAIN!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: wreck on January 12, 2008, 08:44:32 AM
I know we have discussed this -- but how is Devries "perceived" in The Netherlands? Is he more like Geraldo or more like Mike Wallace?

If memory serves me correctly....Wallace before the documentary and Geraldo after...no sorry, that was RUs perception.

From what I've read, most feel he is a real investigative reporter, does not back down and is not afraid to take on police corruption.  MO, after some of his investigations, Joran  would be a piece of cake....
PLEASE,PLEASE,PLEASE tell me a camara was rolling and this "event" was recorded!!!! "Jerry Springer's" white trash guests come to mind! :lol: :lol: :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Buckeye on January 12, 2008, 08:46:46 AM
Seems that after the incident, Joran and Paulus ran out and Anita stayed to explain and defend Joran's behavior......doesn't she always have his back??  Anita runs the show....if those boys would just follow the plan....everything would be fine....they just keep showing their true colors.....Anita will have to call on her friend...once again.. for the defense.  How fast will Moonshadows (Hemingway) and Glenda and MF get to the keyboards?? Spin coming...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Buckeye on January 12, 2008, 08:48:41 AM
I wish Oprah would include some of yesterdays interview including the photo of the water tossing and an interview of those commentators thoughts after the interview to provide an independent editorial from Jorans own home country as to their thoughts on the case. Let Joran's peers provide an unbiased comment on him and the treatment of him by the Dutch system in Aruba.

Maybe have Dr. Phil offer to treat Joran for anger management, do a makeover to show Anita how to hide those udders with fabric you can't see thru and advise Paulus that he can buy zipperless pull up pants.

 Can you imagine Joran's response to discipline from Poopa and Anudder?

 Do you reckon he would throw something at or hit a girl or boy who told him no?
I missed the photo, did he throw the glass or water? Do men throw water at people? hahahahaha roflmao AGAIN!!!!

It burned DeVries eyes and his associate had to get him water to rinse the eyes out (he couldn't see).  So I'm guessing the sporter was drinking something with alcohol in it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 12, 2008, 08:53:48 AM
I know we have discussed this -- but how is Devries "perceived" in The Netherlands? Is he more like Geraldo or more like Mike Wallace?

If memory serves me correctly....Wallace before the documentary and Geraldo after...no sorry, that was RUs perception.

From what I've read, most feel he is a real investigative reporter, does not back down and is not afraid to take on police corruption.  MO, after some of his investigations, Joran  would be a piece of cake....
PLEASE,PLEASE,PLEASE tell me a camara was rolling and this "event" was recorded!!!! "Jerry Springer's" white trash guests come to mind! :lol: :lol: :cool:

Jerry Springer...roflmao for the 3rd time!!!! You are so right Wreck!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 12, 2008, 08:55:55 AM
Seems that after the incident, Joran and Paulus ran out and Anita stayed to explain and defend Joran's behavior......doesn't she always have his back??  Anita runs the show....if those boys would just follow the plan....everything would be fine....they just keep showing their true colors.....Anita will have to call on her friend...once again.. for the defense.  How fast will Moonshadows (Hemingway) and Glenda and MF get to the keyboards?? Spin coming...

Can't wait to see how the defend this one!!! lol
If I were them...I would actually hide!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: robots on January 12, 2008, 09:05:15 AM
the LIES never STOP in ARUBA


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 12, 2008, 09:28:01 AM
There is so much shit being thrown around at refugees...I have to go get a pair of shit boots and a pooper scooper!!! lol
Oh my....it is HILARIOUS watching them try and spin this one!!!!
My oh my...I had my laugh for the day!!!
Have a great Saturday Monkeys!!! Keep the faith!!!!
Next up....BETH STRIKES BACK!!!!! and I am SURE it won't look like a Jerry Springer Show....as the sloots interview did!!!
too many good belly laughs this morning!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Rammstein on January 12, 2008, 09:38:56 AM
I know we have discussed this -- but how is Devries "perceived" in The Netherlands? Is he more like Geraldo or more like Mike Wallace?

I have respect for his tenacity in investigating some crimes, but on the whole, I have close to zero respect for the guy.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 12, 2008, 09:39:35 AM
I wish Oprah would include some of yesterdays interview including the photo of the water tossing and an interview of those commentators thoughts after the interview to provide an independent editorial from Jorans own home country as to their thoughts on the case. Let Joran's peers provide an unbiased comment on him and the treatment of him by the Dutch system in Aruba.

Maybe have Dr. Phil offer to treat Joran for anger management, do a makeover to show Anita how to hide those udders with fabric you can't see thru and advise Paulus that he can buy zipperless pull up pants.

 Can you imagine Joran's response to discipline from Poopa and Anudder?

 Do you reckon he would throw something at or hit a girl or boy who told him no?
I missed the photo, did he throw the glass or water? Do men throw water at people? hahahahaha roflmao AGAIN!!!!

It burned DeVries eyes and his associate had to get him water to rinse the eyes out (he couldn't see).  So I'm guessing the sporter was drinking something with alcohol in it.


(http://bestsmileys.com/drinking/4.gif)
It is "crystal clear" to me  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 12, 2008, 09:42:08 AM
OMG I AM SO SORRY.....................I did not know that file was so HUGE!!!!!!
ACKKKKK....can someone make it smaller please  :smt095 :smt089 :smt086 :smt010


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 12, 2008, 09:52:02 AM
I know we have discussed this -- but how is Devries "perceived" in The Netherlands? Is he more like Geraldo or more like Mike Wallace?

I have respect for his tenacity in investigating some crimes, but on the whole, I have close to zero respect for the guy.

Why? Is it something you can elaborate upon?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Buckeye on January 12, 2008, 09:56:59 AM
The show is up

http://player.omroep.nl/?aflID=6213320


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Rammstein on January 12, 2008, 10:07:12 AM
I know we have discussed this -- but how is Devries "perceived" in The Netherlands? Is he more like Geraldo or more like Mike Wallace?

I have respect for his tenacity in investigating some crimes, but on the whole, I have close to zero respect for the guy.

Why? Is it something you can elaborate upon?

- let's himself be used by criminals
- too close to criminals who actually need investigating
- sensationalist kind of journalist
- petty kind of a person
- spoke at the funeral of one of his crime buddies (serious drugs and crime lord) and talked the guy up like he was Santa and Jesus Christ merged into 1 person.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 12, 2008, 10:14:42 AM
Posted at RU:

Kienstail Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 6:17 am   

In Dutch (sorry...) audio, Peter R de Vries reflects on the show and incident:

http://player.nos.nl/index.php/media/play/tcmid/tcm:5-343390/

Peter R de V sais that this proves to him Joran can't control himself and is (still) capable of erractic, agressive behaviour although Joran's parents would most likely swear J would never do such a thing.

One of the show hosts sais he can't understand the action by J either and was quite -unpleasantly- surprised.

IMO the host (who was on the vdS side earlier) lost confidence in Joran but I have to listen to the audio again to be sure. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: robots on January 12, 2008, 10:16:48 AM
I know we have discussed this -- but how is Devries "perceived" in The Netherlands? Is he more like Geraldo or more like Mike Wallace?

I have respect for his tenacity in investigating some crimes, but on the whole, I have close to zero respect for the guy.

most of the people i know say the opposite

but thats ok, people can heve their own opinion

i have zero respect for the aruba LE as well as the Dutch LE

 :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 12, 2008, 10:17:04 AM
More from RU:

Quote from: Kienstail


Quick scan:   seems pro- and anti VDS (or P R de V) is 50:50.
People seem to dislike PR de V but also distrust VDS.  It seems to be that people in the Netherlands (when looking at other blogs in NL,  not only based on the P&W blog) think Joran has something to hide, think that Aruba is corrupt and think Peter R de Vries has some nasty ways of pushing his will/ego/show to the foreground.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: robots on January 12, 2008, 10:18:20 AM
joran killed Natalee

probably in the same way as he did with this interview

when KILLER boy doesnt get his way he kills people, dogs, probably attempted to kill his brothers, thats why his CRAZY SICK DEMENTED parents put him in an apartment

i hate joran and the whole sloot family


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 12, 2008, 10:20:05 AM
I wish Oprah would include some of yesterdays interview including the photo of the water tossing and an interview of those commentators thoughts after the interview to provide an independent editorial from Jorans own home country as to their thoughts on the case. Let Joran's peers provide an unbiased comment on him and the treatment of him by the Dutch system in Aruba.

Maybe have Dr. Phil offer to treat Joran for anger management, do a makeover to show Anita how to hide those udders with fabric you can't see thru and advise Paulus that he can buy zipperless pull up pants.

 Can you imagine Joran's response to discipline from Poopa and Anudder?

 Do you reckon he would throw something at or hit a girl or boy who told him no?
I missed the photo, did he throw the glass or water? Do men throw water at people? hahahahaha roflmao AGAIN!!!!

It burned DeVries eyes and his associate had to get him water to rinse the eyes out (he couldn't see).  So I'm guessing the sporter was drinking something with alcohol in it.


(http://bestsmileys.com/drinking/4.gif)
It is "crystal clear" to me  :wink:

lol


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: NM on January 12, 2008, 10:21:56 AM
Seems that after the incident, Joran and Paulus ran out and Anita stayed to explain and defend Joran's behavior......doesn't she always have his back??  Anita runs the show....if those boys would just follow the plan....everything would be fine....they just keep showing their true colors.....Anita will have to call on her friend...once again.. for the defense.  How fast will Moonshadows (Hemingway) and Glenda and MF get to the keyboards?? Spin coming...
Buckeye,
Thank you for bringing this info here.

The vds' are a well oiled machine of deciet and crimes.

Go get em' Peter DeVries!!!!!!!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: sharon on January 12, 2008, 10:26:00 AM

most of the people i know say the opposite

but thats ok, people can heve their own opinion  

i have zero respect for the aruba LE as well as the Dutch LE

 :cool:

How do you feel about people who have their own agendas -- that have NOTHING to do with receiving JUSTICE FOR NATALEE.  :wink:

Hope you had great holidays, Robots  :cool:


Matthews -- good. Ben King -- bad.  Dutch judges -- corrupt.

Matthews -- good. Ben King -- bad.  Dutch judges -- corrupt.

Matthews -- good. Ben King -- bad.  Dutch judges -- corrupt.

AVOID ARUBA AS IF YOUR LIFE DEPENDED ON IT -- IT DOES
Justice for Natalee


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: robots on January 12, 2008, 10:33:07 AM

most of the people i know say the opposite

but thats ok, people can heve their own opinion  

i have zero respect for the aruba LE as well as the Dutch LE

 :cool:

How do you feel about people who have their own agendas -- that have NOTHING to do with receiving JUSTICE FOR NATALEE.  :wink:

Hope you had great holidays, Robots  :cool:


Matthews -- good. Ben King -- bad.  Dutch judges -- corrupt.

Matthews -- good. Ben King -- bad.  Dutch judges -- corrupt.

Matthews -- good. Ben King -- bad.  Dutch judges -- corrupt.

AVOID ARUBA AS IF YOUR LIFE DEPENDED ON IT -- IT DOES
Justice for Natalee


 :cool: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Buckeye on January 12, 2008, 10:33:19 AM
EURobert

Is translating and transcribing the show on the FP.  Very interesting reading.  Might be nice to leave him a comment, for all his work.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 12, 2008, 10:38:12 AM
oh Wow!! quick comment and then I have to run...I'm late, I'm late!!!
I was watching the video of the sloots, look at paulus's stature, it is SOOOOOO the video casino!!!! His slouch...man..bet he wasn't thinking about that one!! Maybe we can do some comparisons.
See you all tonight Monkeys...have a great day!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 12, 2008, 10:40:46 AM
Posted by EURobert on the front page of SM - transcription of the show last night:

Transscript and translation of last nights Pauw en Witteman tv-show (Please excuse me for all the grammatical and typing errors that will be in here; it’s to time-consuming to do it flawless…. Mr. Witteman’s first name is Paul so I’ll call PaulvdS: ‘Paulus’; that’s easier for me… To not get confused…)

Witteman: Good evening. Yes, Joran van der Sloot was brought back to Aruba end of november to be interrogated. That interrogation produced nothing. He was let go and the case was dismissed.
Pauw: Joran is here, together with his father Paul and with his mother Anita to have as they themselves say, their last tv-interview about this case.
Witt.: Here as well is Peter R. de Vries who has made a television-documentairy about the NH-case and the role JvdS played, and who has his doubts. He has called Joran a lier, so their is something to be discussed.
Pauw: (Looking at Joran) Yes, well.., you can confess now, so we have that behind us…? … … … … Are that the jokes you hear the most? Or what are you bothered with more Joran?
Joran: Well, I’m not really bothered by others.. But you have to keep making jokes. As you just said yourself… else you don’t get through all this.
Pauw: Do you have the feeling now that the whole matter is over now… or do you still have the feeling that if you somewhere hear a sirene… that could be for me?
Joran: Well… Not really like that but uh it’s something that you’ll never forget. It’s something… It sticks with you all the time. You best just keep going on but… It’s something you won’t easily forget. But I think in the judicial sense it now is over yes.
Pauw: Are you addressed on this often?
Paulus: Uhhmmm… No, actually not so… I’m not addressed on this often. Uhh… All-days live goes it’s normal way… And the people at Aruba have had it with this.
Witt.: Yes, they’ve had it with this… But do they believe you?
Paulus: Uuhhm… I think so.
Witt.: So if you walk the streets you don’t think: ‘Oh they look at me… Maybe indeed a murderer… Or some other creepy-person…?’
Paulus: No, I don’t have that feeling at all. No it’s on the contrary very remarkable… uhhh… such a small community as Aruba is… and as it has had very much negative effects because of all this… That they keep and kept being supportive towards us. That has uh amazed us and… it has… our hearts… strengthened… as well. (Unintelligible.)
Witt.: Were you bothered by it?
Anita: Uhhm… Well I wasn’t bothered by it so much… You know that there is talk… I mean in every community… there is talk about what has happened. Actually… uhm, uhm, it was more like… the people they were very supportive. Neighbours, people you didn’t know at all, that still came to you… We lived on Aruba for almost twenty years… And people know Joran from the time he was very small… They saw Paul or me pushing the pram… And a former teacher of him that came by who said: ‘Well this can not at all be possible… Such a sweet kid…’ So that you felt as if this story must have had a different cause… Something else is going on… And… uh, the support… Well it sounds very strange but… it was very big. Really very big.
Witt.: Well, now the case is dismissed, in the judicial sense over with.., is that the reason you agreed to sit at the table with Peter R. de Vries?
Paulus: Well yes we have allways uh, said that uh, as soon as uh, this case us no longer in court.., when uh, the OM uh, is no longer prosecuting it, we uh, are willing to give uh, another interview, in uh, a reliable tv-show. Uh… To show we have nothing to hide. (I have to skip all the ‘uhs’ here now… the’re just to much of them.) And it is so that all this publicity has had a very big impact on this case. It has even at some point taken over it. We thought that as long as this case is going on it was not right to get in the lamplights - however at some times it was necessary - because we didn’t want to frustrate this investigation in any way.
Witt.: Yes, well uhm, Peter R. de Vries is here… He’s tried before… on Aruba as well, to get in contact with you… We’ll show a little clip how that sometimes went. (Clip of PRdVries at Jorans student-house in Arnhem, confronting Joran with fabricated photo of him with Natalee.)
Pauw: Well there were, before we started this show, some jokes made at this table like: ‘Well Peter… where’s your hidden camera…’ Well that hidden camera is not here right now. Peter, you have tried to get in contact with the VanderSloot-family a couple of times to have interviews… So you didn’t just walk behind them with your hidden camera… Do you understand something of the answer of Paul van der Sloot?
PRdV: No, to be honest, I don’t understand very much of that. I think it’s strange to hear him say here, he has nothing to hide, and he didn’t want to frustrate the investigation… But than I have to notice that they did nothing to help the case. Because Joran vdS has when he was at Aruba the last weeks, and could explain all his actions / conducts, maybe could end the mysteries, maybe could shed some light on that.., he has for weeks ‘kept his molars close on top of each-other’ (dutch expression = didn’t speak). Has not spoken a word, not answered one question! That is not what PvdS says…… this nice saying ‘We have nothing to hide’. Then I think… If you are innocent… and you did nothing wrong… why don’t you just tell your story, why don’t you answer questions from the police? The fact that you just kept your jaws closed (dutch expr.) I think in these circumstances is very strange…..
Pauw: Let’s agree that somewhat later in this show on this question, this is one of your questions but you have more of them, get answers from Joran or his father or mother… But first we…
Peter: Yes…. Just give hime some time to think…..
Pauw: Yes… So you have time to find the ‘right’ answer… (LOL) But firs before we talk about this whole matter let’s give the people at home a small summary of what has all happened and what is known… (CLIP of the NH-case)
Witt.: Were you suprised that you were re-arrested?
Joran: yes, off course… I uh… hadn’t expected that at all… I thought they were joking me… when the police arrived at the door… telling me ‘you’re under arrest again’… Because yes, uh I knew they could have nothing on me… so why would they again….
Witt.: Well it was said that there were new facts, so there were new grounds to arrest you again and take you to Aruba to interrogate you.
Joran: Yes, but I knew that would be impossible… that… that…
Witt.: But what than did you think… if it was impossible, what would be the reason they arrested you again?
Joran: Well I don’t know… Maybe I thought somebody has falsely stated against me, or something bad was said about me. I don’t know… Something like that… That’s what I thought… In that direction… Maybe something like that.
Witt.: And what did it turn out to be?! Because… You got there… You were interrogated…
Joran.: Well there turned out to be abslolutely nothing. No new evidence at all… Just old statements that they looked at in a different way.
Witt.: How did the interrogation go?
Joran: Well, just as mr. De Vries said, I just kept silent. I didn’t say anything.
Witt.: Why not?
Joran: I don’t have any trust anymore in the OM at Aruba… I think that they…. they are not trying to find the truth… or trying to find out what happened in this case. They are just literally doing…. they just want somebody to hang for this…

——-
More to come….

Joran: … they just want somebody to hang for this… They just want for their own egos to… That they themselves come good out of this…
Witt.: Even if it is an innocent person as well…
Joran: Yes, even if it is an innocent person as well. I’m convinced of that.
Peter: Well I think it’s a bit awkward that you say the Aruban OM is not trustworthy where it was you who lied all the time?!
Joran: Yes I lied and I admitt that but there were reasons for that and you don’t know them and….
Peter: Yes! I would like to know those reasons! … To lie about what you have done where you supposedly have nothing to hide!? Why do you have to lie then, tell me that?!
Joran: Well I did that extensivly in my book allready. And you have read that so you allready know the reasons.
Peter: But you are here now to tell your story or…?!!!
Witt.: Let’s agree that we the second part of the show will give you the opportunity to do that but first let’s tell the story of the VdSloot-family according to the rules we’ve in advance agreed on with Joran namely that we first look at what actually happened. Because you say I kept my mouth shut. I didn’t tell them anything more and they didn’t come up with anything new. Were those interrogations despite that tough?
Joran: Uhmmmmm… Well in fact compared to the first ones they were not. They turned out less tough than I’d expected. There was a Dutch detective-team that told THEIR story and in fact it was just speculating what they did. The allready talked in terms of ‘a girl that was dead’, you name it, where in fact it’s just a missing girl.
Pauw: That is all in the file is it… Because in the file of the judge-commissionar it says that it has to be put first that there are strong indications that Natalee is dead.
Joran: I would like to now that know as well…
Pauw: Because there is now evidence you know of she’s dead?
Joran: (Shakes his head.)
Pauw: Well, Deepak Kalpoe had stated that ‘her death was not good’?
Witt.: One of your friends there…
Joran: Yes, that uhhh… I don’t know either how that has went/gone (?) exactly… That’s something you should ask them.
Pauw: Didn’t you ask that to them ever? Like: ‘What have you said now?’
Joran: No (Unintelligible.)
Pauw: But what did you say than?
Joran: No I never asked him that. I uh, I mean we were so often interrogated by the police and we’ve in the beginning made so many statements… And I have allready said all there is to tell. So I think also… Yes… Why do I have to make the same statements twenty times to the police? I think that… the only thing they try is to find a little difference in them…
Pauw.: What we do here Joran, is just citing the report of the Judge-commissionar who has used that at Aruba. In this way Deepak Kalpoe stated that her death was not good, has Satish Kalpoe - which is the other friend or brother, what is it exactly? …
Joran: His brother.
Pauw: … Kalpoe thinks that suspect - you - has hit her to death, you yourself supposedly have stated about the burying of Natalee Holloway? That are some hard fact because of which you suggest that indeed something IS going on?
Joran: Yes, … I, I, … It’s three years ago now and in the beginning we’ve been really treated tough by the police and made to say things that we… wouldn’t say ourselves. And yes I have the feeling they made me want to say things that weren’t true.
Pauw: Did you never say… Or have you never spoken about burying Natalee Holloway?
Joran: No I have never discussed that with the pollice.
Anita: Can I go into that for a moment?
Witt.: Off course.
Anita: Uhmmm… When Joran was arrested for the first time I was the only one who was allowed to see him. Because he was a minor and they wanted to keep out Paul because of his function. Uhm, I have spoken to Joran some times but only short, some 15 to twenty minutes. And I am his mother. I love him very dearly. And I’m really convinced he wouldn’t do anything to that girl. These first emotions, these are very important to me… to see them in him as well… For a moment I doubted him. I’ve thought… By Jingo, could an accident have happened? Has something happened? Doesn’t he want to tell… He is just having his final exams… He knows he has final-exams-celebrations… He has a girlfriend… so he’s cheated on her… His father will be very angry with him… Etc. etc…. So I very directly spoke with him and one of the confrontations… that I came over there… And I was taken by an Aruban detective… And Joran was very upset… He before that was beset for hours and hours… Words were put in his mouth… which he never said… that were put to paper but that he never signed. And they showed that to me…: ‘This is what he said!’
Pauw: Well these are maybe not the most subtle moments in this conversation but Joran, you visited a psychiatrist because you were lying all the time.
Joran: No… That was not the reason why I visited the psychiatrist. I’ve been two times to a childrens psychiatrist but that was because we had some things going on within our family.
Anita: I can explain that as well… So you can hear it from my own mouth… Paul was in Holland for the Judges-training and I had to deal with three children in my own… And Joran as many seventeen year olds… I myself work with teens… And uh… he was not the easiest one. Besides that we had problems with… I had some problems with him… That he came home way to late… Uhm… I’m rather strict… Maybe even sometimes I was a little to strict… And at a certain point after talking about it with a friend of mine, maybe it’s good when we have some consults with a youth-psychiatrist. Because I just want that he has a goal in life… that he thinks well what he wants with his life and all this ‘going out’ I just think bad about that. And at that time he started playing poker in the casino and I don’t want my son being in the casino! So I contacted I youth-psychiatrist… He wasn’t 18 yet, he still was seventeen… He went there twice, that’s correct and we had one conlusive-conversation after that. And that was it… So it was really not just about lying…
Peter: What I now think is striking is that they have no confidence what soever in the judicial authorities. where at the same time it hasn’t been a long time ago that Paul vd Sloot did his very best to work in that organisation.
Pauw: As a judge you mean…
Peter: As a judge. I think it’s striking that suddenly there is so little confidence in that organisation…
Paulus: Well look uhhhh… Mister De Vries can’t hear that good… If he would have listened carefully he would have heard that Joran said that he didn’t have any confidence in the OM (public pros.)! That’s what Joran has said. Joran didn’t talk about the judicial authorities. What you see now.., what has happened is that luckely we have judicial authorities… And we sit here again! So in the end it’s because of the judicial authorities that all has ended well.
Witt.: The judge has said: the case must be dismissed, there is to little evidence, Joran is free! Well let’s for a minute get back to that prosecution before Joran was released because Joran just said they wanted to frame me; that’s what it came to it.


More to come…

 NOTE - i'LL ADD TO THIS POST WHEN MORE IS TRANSLATED AND POSTED ON THE FRONT PAGE OF SM


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 12, 2008, 10:42:00 AM
So he is kind of a sensationalism journalist? We have some of those in the US.

But those were legitimate questions he was asking. If anybody can cite another case where they think that anyone who was last seen with a missing girl, who repeatedly admittedly lied about the night, who framed 2 innocent security guards and never did anything to recant the story even after they were charged with murder, kidnapping, and arrested, who later told investigators that something went wrong and she died and was buried by the fishermans hut, and I realize that he recanted the story, but I also realize he subsequently led the police to the area that he claimed she was buried in, would not be quizzed repeatedly about why all the lies if you are innocent, I would like to know of the case. Paulus being an attorney with some training as a judge had to be prepared for this type of conversation and should have been able to prepare Joran for it.

This boys lies to the police were admittedly orchestrated by the Dad. One who is the son of a judge and was being advised by his father? What we don't understand is what was the goal of the advice his dad was giving him? Obstruct justice? Endanger Natalee's life as time was of the essence? Is this why he was expelled from the training as a judge program?

The most damning evidence is not that Joran was the last to be seen with her. Its all of the acts and lies that occurred when he was questioned about his time with her? And his responses were coached by a practicing attorney, who was in training to become a judge, who was fairly successful in litigation, and absolutely knew that the best defense would have been to simply tell the truth unless the truth was that Joran killed her. Otherwise, Joran got the worst advice possible.

And it is obvious Joran has an anger problem, that his parents have no control over him, and that he resorts to violence when he is frustrated or challeneged. It is also obvious that his parents are use to trying to do damage control as one chased after him, and the other remained to explain his behaviour, act as if nothing unusual happened, and continue on mitigating the episode.

Joran lost his temper and became violent even though I am positive he had been coached and coached not to act that way, knowing both parents were by his side, and knowing the stakes of his behavior during this interview would have on his future.

Is it hard to imagine him becoming frustrated with Natalee if she was as drunken/drugged as he claimed, and then in addition having told him no when he wanted to have sex, then fighting him away while he tried to satisfy his sexual urges, and finally smacking her in the head with a rock or his fist in an uncontrolled rage?

Is it not not possible to visulaize his parents falling into their usual pattern of damage control, and diminishing the death of Natalee as an inanimate object to discard or clean up, just like the glass of water, and then to be able to sit down and discuss their dear sportster as if he is an angel?

Sorry to digress, but yes we have our share of journalist like this one who can pry and irritate their guests, and their respect level varies depending on who is in the audience.

But we don't have one who can make an innocent man act so guilty, to demonstrate the lack of anger control that makes this type of crime so possible, and then to push buttons that cause the parents to immediately fall into a learned and repetitive type of damage control as this journaist did.


This should be 2 post one that responds to your comment, and I don't in any way mean to be negative to you even though this 2 part is certainly a negative post, you in no way have anything to do with the posts, it just came out in thinking about the US journalists who are sensationalist.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 12, 2008, 10:48:35 AM
Private Eye - it's my understanding that Peter de Vries is a crime journalist.  He claims to have solved cases that others couldn't solve.  He's one of those people you either love him or hate him.  I've seen many Dutch posters that love him.

The program last night was not his show, he was a guest on the show. 

Edited to add:  Here is a link to the Peter de Vries show website

http://www.peterrdevries.nl/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: MumInOhio on January 12, 2008, 11:12:17 AM
Posted by EURobert on the front page of SM - transcription of the show last night:

Transscript and translation of last nights Pauw en Witteman tv-show (Please excuse me for all the grammatical and typing errors that will be in here; it’s to time-consuming to do it flawless…. Mr. Witteman’s first name is Paul so I’ll call PaulvdS: ‘Paulus’; that’s easier for me… To not get confused…)

Witteman: Good evening. Yes, Joran van der Sloot was brought back to Aruba end of november to be interrogated. That interrogation produced nothing. He was let go and the case was dismissed.
Pauw: Joran is here, together with his father Paul and with his mother Anita to have as they themselves say, their last tv-interview about this case.
Witt.: Here as well is Peter R. de Vries who has made a television-documentairy about the NH-case and the role JvdS played, and who has his doubts. He has called Joran a lier, so their is something to be discussed.
Pauw: (Looking at Joran) Yes, well.., you can confess now, so we have that behind us…? … … … … Are that the jokes you hear the most? Or what are you bothered with more Joran?
Joran: Well, I’m not really bothered by others.. But you have to keep making jokes. As you just said yourself… else you don’t get through all this.
Pauw: Do you have the feeling now that the whole matter is over now… or do you still have the feeling that if you somewhere hear a sirene… that could be for me?
Joran: Well… Not really like that but uh it’s something that you’ll never forget. It’s something… It sticks with you all the time. You best just keep going on but… It’s something you won’t easily forget. But I think in the judicial sense it now is over yes.
Pauw: Are you addressed on this often?
Paulus: Uhhmmm… No, actually not so… I’m not addressed on this often. Uhh… All-days live goes it’s normal way… And the people at Aruba have had it with this.
Witt.: Yes, they’ve had it with this… But do they believe you?
Paulus: Uuhhm… I think so.
Witt.: So if you walk the streets you don’t think: ‘Oh they look at me… Maybe indeed a murderer… Or some other creepy-person…?’
Paulus: No, I don’t have that feeling at all. No it’s on the contrary very remarkable… uhhh… such a small community as Aruba is… and as it has had very much negative effects because of all this… That they keep and kept being supportive towards us. That has uh amazed us and… it has… our hearts… strengthened… as well. (Unintelligible.)
Witt.: Were you bothered by it?
Anita: Uhhm… Well I wasn’t bothered by it so much… You know that there is talk… I mean in every community… there is talk about what has happened. Actually… uhm, uhm, it was more like… the people they were very supportive. Neighbours, people you didn’t know at all, that still came to you… We lived on Aruba for almost twenty years… And people know Joran from the time he was very small… They saw Paul or me pushing the pram… And a former teacher of him that came by who said: ‘Well this can not at all be possible… Such a sweet kid…’ So that you felt as if this story must have had a different cause… Something else is going on… And… uh, the support… Well it sounds very strange but… it was very big. Really very big.
Witt.: Well, now the case is dismissed, in the judicial sense over with.., is that the reason you agreed to sit at the table with Peter R. de Vries?
Paulus: Well yes we have allways uh, said that uh, as soon as uh, this case us no longer in court.., when uh, the OM uh, is no longer prosecuting it, we uh, are willing to give uh, another interview, in uh, a reliable tv-show. Uh… To show we have nothing to hide. (I have to skip all the ‘uhs’ here now… the’re just to much of them.) And it is so that all this publicity has had a very big impact on this case. It has even at some point taken over it. We thought that as long as this case is going on it was not right to get in the lamplights - however at some times it was necessary - because we didn’t want to frustrate this investigation in any way.
Witt.: Yes, well uhm, Peter R. de Vries is here… He’s tried before… on Aruba as well, to get in contact with you… We’ll show a little clip how that sometimes went. (Clip of PRdVries at Jorans student-house in Arnhem, confronting Joran with fabricated photo of him with Natalee.)
Pauw: Well there were, before we started this show, some jokes made at this table like: ‘Well Peter… where’s your hidden camera…’ Well that hidden camera is not here right now. Peter, you have tried to get in contact with the VanderSloot-family a couple of times to have interviews… So you didn’t just walk behind them with your hidden camera… Do you understand something of the answer of Paul van der Sloot?
PRdV: No, to be honest, I don’t understand very much of that. I think it’s strange to hear him say here, he has nothing to hide, and he didn’t want to frustrate the investigation… But than I have to notice that they did nothing to help the case. Because Joran vdS has when he was at Aruba the last weeks, and could explain all his actions / conducts, maybe could end the mysteries, maybe could shed some light on that.., he has for weeks ‘kept his molars close on top of each-other’ (dutch expression = didn’t speak). Has not spoken a word, not answered one question! That is not what PvdS says…… this nice saying ‘We have nothing to hide’. Then I think… If you are innocent… and you did nothing wrong… why don’t you just tell your story, why don’t you answer questions from the police? The fact that you just kept your jaws closed (dutch expr.) I think in these circumstances is very strange…..
Pauw: Let’s agree that somewhat later in this show on this question, this is one of your questions but you have more of them, get answers from Joran or his father or mother… But first we…
Peter: Yes…. Just give hime some time to think…..
Pauw: Yes… So you have time to find the ‘right’ answer… (LOL) But firs before we talk about this whole matter let’s give the people at home a small summary of what has all happened and what is known… (CLIP of the NH-case)
Witt.: Were you suprised that you were re-arrested?
Joran: yes, off course… I uh… hadn’t expected that at all… I thought they were joking me… when the police arrived at the door… telling me ‘you’re under arrest again’… Because yes, uh I knew they could have nothing on me… so why would they again….
Witt.: Well it was said that there were new facts, so there were new grounds to arrest you again and take you to Aruba to interrogate you.
Joran: Yes, but I knew that would be impossible… that… that…
Witt.: But what than did you think… if it was impossible, what would be the reason they arrested you again?
Joran: Well I don’t know… Maybe I thought somebody has falsely stated against me, or something bad was said about me. I don’t know… Something like that… That’s what I thought… In that direction… Maybe something like that.
Witt.: And what did it turn out to be?! Because… You got there… You were interrogated…
Joran.: Well there turned out to be abslolutely nothing. No new evidence at all… Just old statements that they looked at in a different way.
Witt.: How did the interrogation go?
Joran: Well, just as mr. De Vries said, I just kept silent. I didn’t say anything.
Witt.: Why not?
Joran: I don’t have any trust anymore in the OM at Aruba… I think that they…. they are not trying to find the truth… or trying to find out what happened in this case. They are just literally doing…. they just want somebody to hang for this…

——-
More to come….

Joran: … they just want somebody to hang for this… They just want for their own egos to… That they themselves come good out of this…
Witt.: Even if it is an innocent person as well…
Joran: Yes, even if it is an innocent person as well. I’m convinced of that.
Peter: Well I think it’s a bit awkward that you say the Aruban OM is not trustworthy where it was you who lied all the time?!
Joran: Yes I lied and I admitt that but there were reasons for that and you don’t know them and….
Peter: Yes! I would like to know those reasons! … To lie about what you have done where you supposedly have nothing to hide!? Why do you have to lie then, tell me that?!
Joran: Well I did that extensivly in my book allready. And you have read that so you allready know the reasons.
Peter: But you are here now to tell your story or…?!!!
Witt.: Let’s agree that we the second part of the show will give you the opportunity to do that but first let’s tell the story of the VdSloot-family according to the rules we’ve in advance agreed on with Joran namely that we first look at what actually happened. Because you say I kept my mouth shut. I didn’t tell them anything more and they didn’t come up with anything new. Were those interrogations despite that tough?
Joran: Uhmmmmm… Well in fact compared to the first ones they were not. They turned out less tough than I’d expected. There was a Dutch detective-team that told THEIR story and in fact it was just speculating what they did. The allready talked in terms of ‘a girl that was dead’, you name it, where in fact it’s just a missing girl.
Pauw: That is all in the file is it… Because in the file of the judge-commissionar it says that it has to be put first that there are strong indications that Natalee is dead.
Joran: I would like to now that know as well…
Pauw: Because there is now evidence you know of she’s dead?
Joran: (Shakes his head.)
Pauw: Well, Deepak Kalpoe had stated that ‘her death was not good’?
Witt.: One of your friends there…
Joran: Yes, that uhhh… I don’t know either how that has went/gone (?) exactly… That’s something you should ask them.
Pauw: Didn’t you ask that to them ever? Like: ‘What have you said now?’
Joran: No (Unintelligible.)
Pauw: But what did you say than?
Joran: No I never asked him that. I uh, I mean we were so often interrogated by the police and we’ve in the beginning made so many statements… And I have allready said all there is to tell. So I think also… Yes… Why do I have to make the same statements twenty times to the police? I think that… the only thing they try is to find a little difference in them…
Pauw.: What we do here Joran, is just citing the report of the Judge-commissionar who has used that at Aruba. In this way Deepak Kalpoe stated that her death was not good, has Satish Kalpoe - which is the other friend or brother, what is it exactly? …
Joran: His brother.
Pauw: … Kalpoe thinks that suspect - you - has hit her to death, you yourself supposedly have stated about the burying of Natalee Holloway? That are some hard fact because of which you suggest that indeed something IS going on?
Joran: Yes, … I, I, … It’s three years ago now and in the beginning we’ve been really treated tough by the police and made to say things that we… wouldn’t say ourselves. And yes I have the feeling they made me want to say things that weren’t true.
Pauw: Did you never say… Or have you never spoken about burying Natalee Holloway?
Joran: No I have never discussed that with the pollice.
Anita: Can I go into that for a moment?
Witt.: Off course.
Anita: Uhmmm… When Joran was arrested for the first time I was the only one who was allowed to see him. Because he was a minor and they wanted to keep out Paul because of his function. Uhm, I have spoken to Joran some times but only short, some 15 to twenty minutes. And I am his mother. I love him very dearly. And I’m really convinced he wouldn’t do anything to that girl. These first emotions, these are very important to me… to see them in him as well… For a moment I doubted him. I’ve thought… By Jingo, could an accident have happened? Has something happened? Doesn’t he want to tell… He is just having his final exams… He knows he has final-exams-celebrations… He has a girlfriend… so he’s cheated on her… His father will be very angry with him… Etc. etc…. So I very directly spoke with him and one of the confrontations… that I came over there… And I was taken by an Aruban detective… And Joran was very upset… He before that was beset for hours and hours… Words were put in his mouth… which he never said… that were put to paper but that he never signed. And they showed that to me…: ‘This is what he said!’
Pauw: Well these are maybe not the most subtle moments in this conversation but Joran, you visited a psychiatrist because you were lying all the time.
Joran: No… That was not the reason why I visited the psychiatrist. I’ve been two times to a childrens psychiatrist but that was because we had some things going on within our family.
Anita: I can explain that as well… So you can hear it from my own mouth… Paul was in Holland for the Judges-training and I had to deal with three children in my own… And Joran as many seventeen year olds… I myself work with teens… And uh… he was not the easiest one. Besides that we had problems with… I had some problems with him… That he came home way to late… Uhm… I’m rather strict… Maybe even sometimes I was a little to strict… And at a certain point after talking about it with a friend of mine, maybe it’s good when we have some consults with a youth-psychiatrist. Because I just want that he has a goal in life… that he thinks well what he wants with his life and all this ‘going out’ I just think bad about that. And at that time he started playing poker in the casino and I don’t want my son being in the casino! So I contacted I youth-psychiatrist… He wasn’t 18 yet, he still was seventeen… He went there twice, that’s correct and we had one conlusive-conversation after that. And that was it… So it was really not just about lying…
Peter: What I now think is striking is that they have no confidence what soever in the judicial authorities. where at the same time it hasn’t been a long time ago that Paul vd Sloot did his very best to work in that organisation.
Pauw: As a judge you mean…
Peter: As a judge. I think it’s striking that suddenly there is so little confidence in that organisation…
Paulus: Well look uhhhh… Mister De Vries can’t hear that good… If he would have listened carefully he would have heard that Joran said that he didn’t have any confidence in the OM (public pros.)! That’s what Joran has said. Joran didn’t talk about the judicial authorities. What you see now.., what has happened is that luckely we have judicial authorities… And we sit here again! So in the end it’s because of the judicial authorities that all has ended well.


Witt.: The judge has said: the case must be dismissed, there is to little evidence, Joran is free! Well let’s for a minute get back to that prosecution before Joran was released because Joran just said they wanted to frame me; that’s what it came to it.
More to come…

 NOTE - i'LL ADD TO THIS POST WHEN MORE IS TRANSLATED AND POSTED ON THE FRONT PAGE OF SM


Confused again...I thought it was Smit.  :2doh:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 12, 2008, 11:21:04 AM
Private Eye - it's my understanding that Peter de Vries is a crime journalist.  He claims to have solved cases that others couldn't solve.  He's one of those people you either love him or hate him.  I've seen many Dutch posters that love him.

The program last night was not his show, he was a guest on the show. 

Edited to add:  Here is a link to the Peter de Vries show website

http://www.peterrdevries.nl/


Thanks Klass I love the interviewer, show, host, or guest whomever it was::))) I would have a little understanding for Joran and discount it except he HAD TO BE PREPARED, HAD TO EXPECT IT, AND IS STUPID ENOUGH TO KEEP TALKING AND ACTING SO ARROGANT!!!!!!!!!!AND HAD BOTH PARENTS AT HIS SIDE. NOTICE THAT ANITA DIDN'T EVEN BLINK


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 12, 2008, 11:22:42 AM
Private Eye - it's my understanding that Peter de Vries is a crime journalist.  He claims to have solved cases that others couldn't solve.  He's one of those people you either love him or hate him.  I've seen many Dutch posters that love him.

The program last night was not his show, he was a guest on the show. 

Edited to add:  Here is a link to the Peter de Vries show website

http://www.peterrdevries.nl/

Klass, someone special hasn't heard this yet and they are going to read it now. Do you know which page it is best to start at?


Thanks Klass I love the interviewer, show, host, or guest whomever it was::))) I would have a little understanding for Joran and discount it except he HAD TO BE PREPARED, HAD TO EXPECT IT, AND IS STUPID ENOUGH TO KEEP TALKING AND ACTING SO ARROGANT!!!!!!!!!!AND HAD BOTH PARENTS AT HIS SIDE. NOTICE THAT ANITA DIDN'T EVEN BLINK


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 12, 2008, 11:23:40 AM
So he is kind of a sensationalism journalist? We have some of those in the US.

But those were legitimate questions he was asking. If anybody can cite another case where they think that anyone who was last seen with a missing girl, who repeatedly admittedly lied about the night, who framed 2 innocent security guards and never did anything to recant the story even after they were charged with murder, kidnapping, and arrested, who later told investigators that something went wrong and she died and was buried by the fishermans hut, and I realize that he recanted the story, but I also realize he subsequently led the police to the area that he claimed she was buried in, would not be quizzed repeatedly about why all the lies if you are innocent, I would like to know of the case. Paulus being an attorney with some training as a judge had to be prepared for this type of conversation and should have been able to prepare Joran for it.

This boys lies to the police were admittedly orchestrated by the Dad. One who is the son of a judge and was being advised by his father? What we don't understand is what was the goal of the advice his dad was giving him? Obstruct justice? Endanger Natalee's life as time was of the essence? Is this why he was expelled from the training as a judge program?

The most damning evidence is not that Joran was the last to be seen with her. Its all of the acts and lies that occurred when he was questioned about his time with her? And his responses were coached by a practicing attorney, who was in training to become a judge, who was fairly successful in litigation, and absolutely knew that the best defense would have been to simply tell the truth unless the truth was that Joran killed her. Otherwise, Joran got the worst advice possible.

And it is obvious Joran has an anger problem, that his parents have no control over him, and that he resorts to violence when he is frustrated or challeneged. It is also obvious that his parents are use to trying to do damage control as one chased after him, and the other remained to explain his behaviour, act as if nothing unusual happened, and continue on mitigating the episode.

Joran lost his temper and became violent even though I am positive he had been coached and coached not to act that way, knowing both parents were by his side, and knowing the stakes of his behavior during this interview would have on his future.

Is it hard to imagine him becoming frustrated with Natalee if she was as drunken/drugged as he claimed, and then in addition having told him no when he wanted to have sex, then fighting him away while he tried to satisfy his sexual urges, and finally smacking her in the head with a rock or his fist in an uncontrolled rage?

Is it not not possible to visulaize his parents falling into their usual pattern of damage control, and diminishing the death of Natalee as an inanimate object to discard or clean up, just like the glass of water, and then to be able to sit down and discuss their dear sportster as if he is an angel?

Sorry to digress, but yes we have our share of journalist like this one who can pry and irritate their guests, and their respect level varies depending on who is in the audience.

But we don't have one who can make an innocent man act so guilty, to demonstrate the lack of anger control that makes this type of crime so possible, and then to push buttons that cause the parents to immediately fall into a learned and repetitive type of damage control as this journaist did.


This should be 2 post one that responds to your comment, and I don't in any way mean to be negative to you even though this 2 part is certainly a negative post, you in no way have anything to do with the posts, it just came out in thinking about the US journalists who are sensationalist.

This is the greatest post I have seen yet.  Needs to be repeated and repeated often. This sums it up.  After what he did in that interview there should be not questions what he did to Natalee.  And NOW I am convinced his parents helped him clean it up just as they did on that show. And they wonder why this just doesn't go away.  The great Sporter did himself no good on that interview and his parents showed themselves for who they really are.  They could care less about the loss of life of Natalee. YES Joran, Anita and Paul SHE does have a name and it will forever be burned in Aruba's image who she is. Thanks to all of you.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 12, 2008, 11:26:46 AM
1. How long has it been since Joran took a shower???  :shock: :smt087
2. Doesn't Paulus usually wear his watch on his other wrist? :2thinky:
3. Very rude and disrespectful for Joran not to remove his hat for this show :thumbdown:   :smt018 :smt011

I am having some buffering problems...will try to watch again later all the way through.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 12, 2008, 11:33:58 AM
Private Eye -  :D  I would say start on page 20 about 1/2 way down then though this page (21)  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Buckeye on January 12, 2008, 11:33:59 AM
Mum

Witt, in this instance is a panel member.  That was not a quote from the judge.  It was a comment from the interviewer after Paulus commented about the judiciary.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 12, 2008, 11:35:13 AM
I'm having problems watching the video too (buffering).  My hope is that Joran throwing the glass of wine on DeVries was captured on film by someone.  I know it's not in the normal show tape but maybe some out take?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 12, 2008, 11:35:17 AM
You  know, Anita's first instinct was that Joran was hiding something and he COULD be responsible for an accident happening that night.  A mothers first instinct is usually correct when it comes to their kids.  She was right about him right off the bat.  Why does she allow Beth and Dave to continue suffering when she knows better than anyone what happened that night?  Could if be because there is more to it than Joran, maybe her husband?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Buckeye on January 12, 2008, 11:38:46 AM
DeTelegraaf posted the wine throwing and they have over 300 reaction posts.  The majority think the same that we think.  There are many comments about Paulus wanting to clear the air but telling Joran to be quiet and not cooperate with the police.  Then of course, still not wanting to answer questions from DeVries.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 12, 2008, 11:38:52 AM
Posted at Scrux:

Jonathan45

Joined: 09 Jun 2007
Posts: 168

 Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 9:59 pm    Post subject:   

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Last night, accompanied by his parents, the killertroll entered my theatre to deny on stage that he walked home barefoot.

That's true.
He never lost his shoes.

He lost his furious mind for a few minutes, that's all.

 
 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 12, 2008, 11:43:34 AM
Private Eye -  :D  I would say start on page 20 about 1/2 way down then though this page (21)  :wink:


Thanks I know this is going to be a pleasant surprise


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 12, 2008, 11:47:06 AM
You  know, Anita's first instinct was that Joran was hiding something and he COULD be responsible for an accident happening that night.  A mothers first instinct is usually correct when it comes to their kids.  She was right about him right off the bat.  Why does she allow Beth and Dave to continue suffering when she knows better than anyone what happened that night?  Could if be because there is more to it than Joran, maybe her husband?


What Joran did was horrible, but what a kid does at night intoxicated pales to his parents forcing Beth to endure what she has. She is the only person who can turn this around not just for Beth but for both families, Joran included. She needs to realize that getting away with it is worse for Joran than getting caught, and for his siblings.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Rammstein on January 12, 2008, 11:52:53 AM
I'm having problems watching the video too (buffering).  My hope is that Joran throwing the glass of wine on DeVries was captured on film by someone.  I know it's not in the normal show tape but maybe some out take?

from what I read of an eyewitness, there is tape of the incident, it was repeated on one of the screens in the room where this happened. The witness hopes it will be shown next week on P&W


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: wreck on January 12, 2008, 11:53:28 AM
DeTelegraaf posted the wine throwing and they have over 300 reaction posts.  The majority think the same that we think.  There are many comments about Paulus wanting to clear the air but telling Joran to be quiet and not cooperate with the police.  Then of course, still not wanting to answer questions from DeVries.
Is there VIDEO??????


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 12, 2008, 11:54:58 AM
P.I., you are so right but do you ever see Anita doing the right thing?  I don't.  She is fighting for her family (or so she thinks) and it is a losing battle. She cannot keep her sporter in line. He can't even do an interview without losing it and there is nothing her or Paulus can do about it.  Her son has serious serious problems and only she can see to it he gets help that is so needed.  But I don't believe she is strong enough to do that for herself, her family and most importantly for Beth and Dave.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 12, 2008, 11:57:03 AM
I'm having problems watching the video too (buffering).  My hope is that Joran throwing the glass of wine on DeVries was captured on film by someone.  I know it's not in the normal show tape but maybe some out take?

from what I read of an eyewitness, there is tape of the incident, it was repeated on one of the screens in the room where this happened. The witness hopes it will be shown next week on P&W

Thanks Ramm - that's one video I want to capture  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Buckeye on January 12, 2008, 11:58:16 AM
DeTelegraaf posted the wine throwing and they have over 300 reaction posts.  The majority think the same that we think.  There are many comments about Paulus wanting to clear the air but telling Joran to be quiet and not cooperate with the police.  Then of course, still not wanting to answer questions from DeVries.
Is there VIDEO??????

Not there.  There was a comment on the site that linked to the posted pic about a secret camera...I didn't understand it all.  Ramm probably has the comment correct.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: wreck on January 12, 2008, 12:01:05 PM
The defenders of Joran are the same idiots sending marriage proposals to Scott Peterson.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: robots on January 12, 2008, 12:02:07 PM
anita knows what happened

anita is as bad as the rest of them


"evil happens when when people sit on their fat asses and describe young womens
under clothes and tell lies after lie"





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: robots on January 12, 2008, 12:03:42 PM
ATTENTION JOE TACOPINA


how is your killer client today ?

huh JOE ?

i think you suck

i think joran sucks

i think paulus sucks

i think anita sucks

sue me  :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: robots on January 12, 2008, 12:05:45 PM
------  NEWSFLASH   ------


JOE TACOPINA wants to marry ANITA

joe says he is in love with her and wants to raise joran

this is just a rumor, but i found it interesting


 :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:   


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 12, 2008, 12:06:04 PM
Posted on Gretawire:

Comment by tammy
January 12th, 2008 at 11:43 am
I just read DE TELEGRAAF and they mentioned that Joran van der Sloot thrown a glass with red wine in a reporters face after the critical interview on tv was over. The name of this crime reporter is Peter de Vries and was onces On The Record, at least I heard his voice in an interview. They gonna show this over and over since it happened during the end titeling of the show.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: crazybabyborg on January 12, 2008, 12:07:02 PM
I want to see this, I want to see this, and I WANT to see this! It's bound to show up on youtube or something, right? Klaas? You'll make a beeline to send it to Greta if it shows up, right?  :D

This guy is a timebomb that,like Timex, just keeps on ticking................


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: robots on January 12, 2008, 12:09:40 PM
peter D... asked tough questions and doesnt believe a word joran says and joran IMPLODES


greta-load...  asked nothing and threw softballs at joran the whole interview

i heard that joran and greta were making out in the green room after the interview

greta makes me want to PUKE

 :-x :-x :-x :-x :-x :-x :-x :-x


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 12, 2008, 12:09:53 PM
Don't you think Joran threw that glass of wine in Peter's face to impress his special friends at RU?  Joran and company cannot keep from shooting themselves in the foot every time they open their mouths. And this crazy person pulled one over on the Aruban judiciary? Go figure.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 12, 2008, 12:12:13 PM
I want to see this, I want to see this, and I WANT to see this! It's bound to show up on youtube or something, right? Klaas? You'll make a beeline to send it to Greta if it shows up, right?  :D

This guy is a timebomb that,like Timex, just keeps on ticking................

Yes it will turn up either on the show website or youtube and I'll capture it.  Then I'll turn it into an animation like "sweatyrunningman"  :lol:

I'll post it side by side with this:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub2/Sweatyrunningman-new2-1.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: wreck on January 12, 2008, 12:14:00 PM
I want to see this, I want to see this, and I WANT to see this! It's bound to show up on youtube or something, right? Klaas? You'll make a beeline to send it to Greta if it shows up, right?  :D

This guy is a timebomb that,like Timex, just keeps on ticking................

Yes it will turn up either on the show website or youtube and I'll capture it.  Then I'll turn it into an animation like "sweatyrunningman"  :lol:

 :lol: :lol: :lol: there IS a God!!!!!  :lol: :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: robots on January 12, 2008, 12:15:20 PM
I want to see this, I want to see this, and I WANT to see this! It's bound to show up on youtube or something, right? Klaas? You'll make a beeline to send it to Greta if it shows up, right?  :D

This guy is a timebomb that,like Timex, just keeps on ticking................

Yes it will turn up either on the show website or youtube and I'll capture it.  Then I'll turn it into an animation like "sweatyrunningman"  :lol:

klass is a wizard  :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: robots on January 12, 2008, 12:18:21 PM
robots thought print concerning killer joran


when he doesnt get his way he does the following

1. he breaks them  :-x

2. the throws them away  :-x

3. and blames others for making him do it  :-x

sound familiar ????

he is EVIL



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: crazybabyborg on January 12, 2008, 12:20:59 PM
I want to see this, I want to see this, and I WANT to see this! It's bound to show up on youtube or something, right? Klaas? You'll make a beeline to send it to Greta if it shows up, right?  :D

This guy is a timebomb that,like Timex, just keeps on ticking................

Yes it will turn up either on the show website or youtube and I'll capture it.  Then I'll turn it into an animation like "sweatyrunningman"  :lol:

I'll post it side by side with this:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub2/Sweatyrunningman-new2-1.gif)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pFJHnBsOkDs

Klaas! Go 5 minutes into the video above. I don't have the capability, but there's lots of potential with it!  :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 12, 2008, 12:24:16 PM
CBB - lolol  :D :D :D :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: MumInOhio on January 12, 2008, 12:27:53 PM
Buckeye...Thanks...I said I was confused! :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: San on January 12, 2008, 12:30:56 PM
I have been over at the Oprah website writing a book in response to one of the idiotic posts and needed to edit, pressed "cancel" by mistake and erased the entire thing.  When will I ever learn to save a copy on word before I do ANYTHING else... :2doh:I'm just sick because I'll have to go back and do it all over again.  I'd gained momentum from ******* earlier in the evening, I hope I can actually post one later that will get close to the one I just finished. :gaah:
 

I feel your pain TM :( I lost many good posts on the FP when when 1+1 didn't =2..Let them know whats up TM..The show on Oprah is gonna be big! Estimated 23 million viewers!!

Next time write the entire thing in word and then copy and paste it to the blog.  Don't write it in the blog only to copy it to word because while you are writing it something could happen (like being thrown off your internet connection) and you will lose it anyway.  This way if something happens you still have word open and all you would have to do is copy paste again.

I have seen a lot of people do this mistake all the time when they are writing a big post and writing it in word saves a lot of frustration of losing something.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 12, 2008, 12:32:18 PM
P.I., you are so right but do you ever see Anita doing the right thing?  I don't.  She is fighting for her family (or so she thinks) and it is a losing battle. She cannot keep her sporter in line. He can't even do an interview without losing it and there is nothing her or Paulus can do about it.  Her son has serious serious problems and only she can see to it he gets help that is so needed.  But I don't believe she is strong enough to do that for herself, her family and most importantly for Beth and Dave.

I think she loves her family and would lay her life down to protect it. She needs to stop and candidly evaluate Joran's behavior, realize that he is a product of whatever corrective steps she has taken in the past, determine that he is indeed heading for a dismal life as an adult, that her younger children are going to emulate Joran, and become strong enough to do the right thing. That includes getting Joran the help he desperately needs, getting Beth the answers she desperately needs, and then having faith that by doing the right thing she is never going to do the wrong thing. Have faith, let this play out, and she may be surprised that the compassion the world has for a mother doing right with her son. The road to the right may be scary and require faith, but it is never wrong.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 12, 2008, 12:35:33 PM
When a person starts to drink regularly they cease to mature emotionally.
That would put Joran at about 15 years.  Sounds about right.

I couldn't decide if he looked more like a monkey :shock: or a terriorist
in the video.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 12, 2008, 12:35:35 PM
robots thought print concerning killer joran


when he doesnt get his way he does the following

1. he breaks them  :-x

2. the throws them away  :-x

3. and blames others for making him do it  :-x

sound familiar ????

he is EVIL



Or is he a boy who has not gotten the training his condition required and is now out of control and thus a danger. He has not been taught to control his urges and frustrations nor has he been taught boundaries. Mostly because he has been shielded from consequences.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 12, 2008, 12:42:32 PM
Don't you think Joran threw that glass of wine in Peter's face to impress his special friends at RU?  Joran and company cannot keep from shooting themselves in the foot every time they open their mouths. And this crazy person pulled one over on the Aruban judiciary? Go figure.

They were not fooled, they know him well. The Warden where Joran was incarcerated is an old family friend, has known Joran since he was a little kid, and when asked said he was not surprised to see Joran as a prisoner given his temper he has always had and his size. They just covered it up for him.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Jerry from Ohio on January 12, 2008, 12:49:54 PM
  She is also a cutie   Opps   Now I got to stop flirting with a married woman  Jessica  says  ::::: Grin :::::  Klaas knows that I think a lot of her,  Mind and all is just as appealing in my book .
  Now just how many men can get excited about a smart Lady  ??  Well I can, that is what attracted me to Jessica in the first place  and then I got a bonus in her appearence to boot (Cowboy Boot that is  ROFL)
  and yup Klaas is surely as close to a wizard in real life that i know .
    Jessica and Jerry from Ohio  :smt052

klass is a wizard  :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink:
[/quote]


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Blakerin on January 12, 2008, 12:59:56 PM
By Jingo! Anita, not your sweet boy! :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 12, 2008, 01:02:23 PM
Klassend,

Could you please email me. I need a big favor if at all possible


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 12, 2008, 01:06:24 PM
Klassend,

Could you please email me. I need a big favor if at all possible

Just did  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 12, 2008, 01:07:23 PM
Jerry - thanks for the complement  :D


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 12, 2008, 01:09:35 PM
Posted by EURobert on the front page of SM - transcription of the show last night:

Transscript and translation of last nights Pauw en Witteman tv-show (Please excuse me for all the grammatical and typing errors that will be in here; it’s to time-consuming to do it flawless…. Mr. Witteman’s first name is Paul so I’ll call PaulvdS: ‘Paulus’; that’s easier for me… To not get confused…)

Witteman: Good evening. Yes, Joran van der Sloot was brought back to Aruba end of november to be interrogated. That interrogation produced nothing. He was let go and the case was dismissed.
Pauw: Joran is here, together with his father Paul and with his mother Anita to have as they themselves say, their last tv-interview about this case.
Witt.: Here as well is Peter R. de Vries who has made a television-documentairy about the NH-case and the role JvdS played, and who has his doubts. He has called Joran a lier, so their is something to be discussed.
Pauw: (Looking at Joran) Yes, well.., you can confess now, so we have that behind us…? … … … … Are that the jokes you hear the most? Or what are you bothered with more Joran?
Joran: Well, I’m not really bothered by others.. But you have to keep making jokes. As you just said yourself… else you don’t get through all this.
Pauw: Do you have the feeling now that the whole matter is over now… or do you still have the feeling that if you somewhere hear a sirene… that could be for me?
Joran: Well… Not really like that but uh it’s something that you’ll never forget. It’s something… It sticks with you all the time. You best just keep going on but… It’s something you won’t easily forget. But I think in the judicial sense it now is over yes.
Pauw: Are you addressed on this often?
Paulus: Uhhmmm… No, actually not so… I’m not addressed on this often. Uhh… All-days live goes it’s normal way… And the people at Aruba have had it with this.
Witt.: Yes, they’ve had it with this… But do they believe you?
Paulus: Uuhhm… I think so.
Witt.: So if you walk the streets you don’t think: ‘Oh they look at me… Maybe indeed a murderer… Or some other creepy-person…?’
Paulus: No, I don’t have that feeling at all. No it’s on the contrary very remarkable… uhhh… such a small community as Aruba is… and as it has had very much negative effects because of all this… That they keep and kept being supportive towards us. That has uh amazed us and… it has… our hearts… strengthened… as well. (Unintelligible.)
Witt.: Were you bothered by it?
Anita: Uhhm… Well I wasn’t bothered by it so much… You know that there is talk… I mean in every community… there is talk about what has happened. Actually… uhm, uhm, it was more like… the people they were very supportive. Neighbours, people you didn’t know at all, that still came to you… We lived on Aruba for almost twenty years… And people know Joran from the time he was very small… They saw Paul or me pushing the pram… And a former teacher of him that came by who said: ‘Well this can not at all be possible… Such a sweet kid…’ So that you felt as if this story must have had a different cause… Something else is going on… And… uh, the support… Well it sounds very strange but… it was very big. Really very big.
Witt.: Well, now the case is dismissed, in the judicial sense over with.., is that the reason you agreed to sit at the table with Peter R. de Vries?
Paulus: Well yes we have allways uh, said that uh, as soon as uh, this case us no longer in court.., when uh, the OM uh, is no longer prosecuting it, we uh, are willing to give uh, another interview, in uh, a reliable tv-show. Uh… To show we have nothing to hide. (I have to skip all the ‘uhs’ here now… the’re just to much of them.) And it is so that all this publicity has had a very big impact on this case. It has even at some point taken over it. We thought that as long as this case is going on it was not right to get in the lamplights - however at some times it was necessary - because we didn’t want to frustrate this investigation in any way.
Witt.: Yes, well uhm, Peter R. de Vries is here… He’s tried before… on Aruba as well, to get in contact with you… We’ll show a little clip how that sometimes went. (Clip of PRdVries at Jorans student-house in Arnhem, confronting Joran with fabricated photo of him with Natalee.)
Pauw: Well there were, before we started this show, some jokes made at this table like: ‘Well Peter… where’s your hidden camera…’ Well that hidden camera is not here right now. Peter, you have tried to get in contact with the VanderSloot-family a couple of times to have interviews… So you didn’t just walk behind them with your hidden camera… Do you understand something of the answer of Paul van der Sloot?
PRdV: No, to be honest, I don’t understand very much of that. I think it’s strange to hear him say here, he has nothing to hide, and he didn’t want to frustrate the investigation… But than I have to notice that they did nothing to help the case. Because Joran vdS has when he was at Aruba the last weeks, and could explain all his actions / conducts, maybe could end the mysteries, maybe could shed some light on that.., he has for weeks ‘kept his molars close on top of each-other’ (dutch expression = didn’t speak). Has not spoken a word, not answered one question! That is not what PvdS says…… this nice saying ‘We have nothing to hide’. Then I think… If you are innocent… and you did nothing wrong… why don’t you just tell your story, why don’t you answer questions from the police? The fact that you just kept your jaws closed (dutch expr.) I think in these circumstances is very strange…..
Pauw: Let’s agree that somewhat later in this show on this question, this is one of your questions but you have more of them, get answers from Joran or his father or mother… But first we…
Peter: Yes…. Just give hime some time to think…..
Pauw: Yes… So you have time to find the ‘right’ answer… (LOL) But firs before we talk about this whole matter let’s give the people at home a small summary of what has all happened and what is known… (CLIP of the NH-case)
Witt.: Were you suprised that you were re-arrested?
Joran: yes, off course… I uh… hadn’t expected that at all… I thought they were joking me… when the police arrived at the door… telling me ‘you’re under arrest again’… Because yes, uh I knew they could have nothing on me… so why would they again….
Witt.: Well it was said that there were new facts, so there were new grounds to arrest you again and take you to Aruba to interrogate you.
Joran: Yes, but I knew that would be impossible… that… that…
Witt.: But what than did you think… if it was impossible, what would be the reason they arrested you again?
Joran: Well I don’t know… Maybe I thought somebody has falsely stated against me, or something bad was said about me. I don’t know… Something like that… That’s what I thought… In that direction… Maybe something like that.
Witt.: And what did it turn out to be?! Because… You got there… You were interrogated…
Joran.: Well there turned out to be abslolutely nothing. No new evidence at all… Just old statements that they looked at in a different way.
Witt.: How did the interrogation go?
Joran: Well, just as mr. De Vries said, I just kept silent. I didn’t say anything.
Witt.: Why not?
Joran: I don’t have any trust anymore in the OM at Aruba… I think that they…. they are not trying to find the truth… or trying to find out what happened in this case. They are just literally doing…. they just want somebody to hang for this…

——-
More to come….

Joran: … they just want somebody to hang for this… They just want for their own egos to… That they themselves come good out of this…
Witt.: Even if it is an innocent person as well…
Joran: Yes, even if it is an innocent person as well. I’m convinced of that.
Peter: Well I think it’s a bit awkward that you say the Aruban OM is not trustworthy where it was you who lied all the time?!
Joran: Yes I lied and I admitt that but there were reasons for that and you don’t know them and….
Peter: Yes! I would like to know those reasons! … To lie about what you have done where you supposedly have nothing to hide!? Why do you have to lie then, tell me that?!
Joran: Well I did that extensivly in my book allready. And you have read that so you allready know the reasons.
Peter: But you are here now to tell your story or…?!!!
Witt.: Let’s agree that we the second part of the show will give you the opportunity to do that but first let’s tell the story of the VdSloot-family according to the rules we’ve in advance agreed on with Joran namely that we first look at what actually happened. Because you say I kept my mouth shut. I didn’t tell them anything more and they didn’t come up with anything new. Were those interrogations despite that tough?
Joran: Uhmmmmm… Well in fact compared to the first ones they were not. They turned out less tough than I’d expected. There was a Dutch detective-team that told THEIR story and in fact it was just speculating what they did. The allready talked in terms of ‘a girl that was dead’, you name it, where in fact it’s just a missing girl.
Pauw: That is all in the file is it… Because in the file of the judge-commissionar it says that it has to be put first that there are strong indications that Natalee is dead.
Joran: I would like to now that know as well…
Pauw: Because there is now evidence you know of she’s dead?
Joran: (Shakes his head.)
Pauw: Well, Deepak Kalpoe had stated that ‘her death was not good’?
Witt.: One of your friends there…
Joran: Yes, that uhhh… I don’t know either how that has went/gone (?) exactly… That’s something you should ask them.
Pauw: Didn’t you ask that to them ever? Like: ‘What have you said now?’
Joran: No (Unintelligible.)
Pauw: But what did you say than?
Joran: No I never asked him that. I uh, I mean we were so often interrogated by the police and we’ve in the beginning made so many statements… And I have allready said all there is to tell. So I think also… Yes… Why do I have to make the same statements twenty times to the police? I think that… the only thing they try is to find a little difference in them…
Pauw.: What we do here Joran, is just citing the report of the Judge-commissionar who has used that at Aruba. In this way Deepak Kalpoe stated that her death was not good, has Satish Kalpoe - which is the other friend or brother, what is it exactly? …
Joran: His brother.
Pauw: … Kalpoe thinks that suspect - you - has hit her to death, you yourself supposedly have stated about the burying of Natalee Holloway? That are some hard fact because of which you suggest that indeed something IS going on?
Joran: Yes, … I, I, … It’s three years ago now and in the beginning we’ve been really treated tough by the police and made to say things that we… wouldn’t say ourselves. And yes I have the feeling they made me want to say things that weren’t true.
Pauw: Did you never say… Or have you never spoken about burying Natalee Holloway?
Joran: No I have never discussed that with the pollice.
Anita: Can I go into that for a moment?
Witt.: Off course.
Anita: Uhmmm… When Joran was arrested for the first time I was the only one who was allowed to see him. Because he was a minor and they wanted to keep out Paul because of his function. Uhm, I have spoken to Joran some times but only short, some 15 to twenty minutes. And I am his mother. I love him very dearly. And I’m really convinced he wouldn’t do anything to that girl. These first emotions, these are very important to me… to see them in him as well… For a moment I doubted him. I’ve thought… By Jingo, could an accident have happened? Has something happened? Doesn’t he want to tell… He is just having his final exams… He knows he has final-exams-celebrations… He has a girlfriend… so he’s cheated on her… His father will be very angry with him… Etc. etc…. So I very directly spoke with him and one of the confrontations… that I came over there… And I was taken by an Aruban detective… And Joran was very upset… He before that was beset for hours and hours… Words were put in his mouth… which he never said… that were put to paper but that he never signed. And they showed that to me…: ‘This is what he said!’
Pauw: Well these are maybe not the most subtle moments in this conversation but Joran, you visited a psychiatrist because you were lying all the time.
Joran: No… That was not the reason why I visited the psychiatrist. I’ve been two times to a childrens psychiatrist but that was because we had some things going on within our family.
Anita: I can explain that as well… So you can hear it from my own mouth… Paul was in Holland for the Judges-training and I had to deal with three children in my own… And Joran as many seventeen year olds… I myself work with teens… And uh… he was not the easiest one. Besides that we had problems with… I had some problems with him… That he came home way to late… Uhm… I’m rather strict… Maybe even sometimes I was a little to strict… And at a certain point after talking about it with a friend of mine, maybe it’s good when we have some consults with a youth-psychiatrist. Because I just want that he has a goal in life… that he thinks well what he wants with his life and all this ‘going out’ I just think bad about that. And at that time he started playing poker in the casino and I don’t want my son being in the casino! So I contacted I youth-psychiatrist… He wasn’t 18 yet, he still was seventeen… He went there twice, that’s correct and we had one conlusive-conversation after that. And that was it… So it was really not just about lying…
Peter: What I now think is striking is that they have no confidence what soever in the judicial authorities. where at the same time it hasn’t been a long time ago that Paul vd Sloot did his very best to work in that organisation.
Pauw: As a judge you mean…
Peter: As a judge. I think it’s striking that suddenly there is so little confidence in that organisation…
Paulus: Well look uhhhh… Mister De Vries can’t hear that good… If he would have listened carefully he would have heard that Joran said that he didn’t have any confidence in the OM (public pros.)! That’s what Joran has said. Joran didn’t talk about the judicial authorities. What you see now.., what has happened is that luckely we have judicial authorities… And we sit here again! So in the end it’s because of the judicial authorities that all has ended well.
Witt.: The judge has said: the case must be dismissed, there is to little evidence, Joran is free! Well let’s for a minute get back to that prosecution before Joran was released because Joran just said they wanted to frame me; that’s what it came to it.


More to come…

 NOTE - i'LL ADD TO THIS POST WHEN MORE IS TRANSLATED AND POSTED ON THE FRONT PAGE OF SM

More of the show translated by EURobert:

Next bit…

Witt.: Well let’s for a minute get back to that prosecution before Joran was released because Joran just said they wanted to frame me; that’s what it turned out to be.
Joran: Well it was more like… In the beginning… the first time I was arrested they were rather tough with us: they sticked pictures of the girl to the wall… And uh, they told me as well… these two brothers… They played us off against eachother. Suggested that we had said things about eachother that were… That weren’t true all the time…
Witt.: But you all had learned the same story?
Joran: Yes.., we had agreed on… we had agreed on that… in advance…
Pauw: That you had taken her to a hotel… And that she was so unstable she had to hold on to a pillar… And I think that all three of you up to the pillar, told the same story?!
Joran: Yes but everyone had added their own things to it…
Pauw: But why did you do that? Why did you agree on making up this particular story?
Joran: Yes.., yes… Why this story? I just was scared at that moment… Those parents suddenly were at our house… And yes… I didn’t have a clue either what to do next.
Pauw: And so you decide the three of you to make up one story and this is how we’re going to tell it.
Peter: You just can tell the truth can you, when nothing happened? There’s no reason to lie is there?
Joran: Yes, I don’t think the truth sounds that good if you have to say you left a girl at the beach.
Peter: So you think a lie sounds better than the truth?
Joran: Well I didn’t know how serious this all was. I didn’t know there was a serious problem.
Peter: That’s exacly why it is so strange to lie!? When you don’t know that there is a serious problem there is no reason to lie at all!? That’s exactly the strange thing of lying here!?
Pauw: Peter… Peter you a father of a teenager, well maybe that’s a bit insipid, father of a young daughter… You can imagine you do something… leaving a girl at the beach… Let’s just tell I decently brought her back…. Such a little lie you can imagine can you?
Peter: No, I can’t imagine that Jeroen… I think you must try to see the psychology behind that. When he doesn’t know what has happened to that girl and she, after she slept away her drunkenness, simply shows up again then he is really caught lying! The fact that he nevertheless tells this lie you can interpret as: he knew he wouldn’t get caught telling this lie. Because he knew Natalee wouldn’t show up again!
Witt.: Don’t you think you look at this in a to much argumentual way? We talk about a seventeen year old boy who is confronted with the parents of girl that possibly has disappeared, maybe think that she is murdered and look at him, then you get in a panic don’t you think? In that case you may not immediatly tell them ‘Yes, I left her at the beach’.
Peter: Well I think it’s always the best option to simply tell the truth especially when you’re…
Witt.: But as a reality-reporter you must know there are exeptions to this rule…?
Peter: Yes, and most of the time they have good reasons.. But in a situation that nothing has happened.., there were no wrongdoings.., the girl herself wanted to stay there.., or get home by herself… than that’s what you say don’t you? The fact that you don’t do that AND THE THREE OF YOU IN A VERY SMART WAY MAKE UP A STORY… I think that’s suspicious.
Joran: I think it’s bad that I lied myself as well and that’s what I regret the most. If I had came forward with the truth at the beginning I think everything would have gone very different. And I think that as well is one off the reasons mister De Vries thinks the way he thinks but when you just look at the facts in this case… The timeperiod I was with this girl, being home after that, going to school the next day, and other things… What then do you try to say I have done?
Peter: If you want to discuss the facts, than tell me how you got home that night?
Joran: I was taken home by Satish…
Peter: Yes… And he denies that! He says I didn’t take him to his home at all! And first you stated that you were brought home by Deepak!!?? Not by Satish!!! Those are things as well that put you in a…..
Joran: Mister De Vries… I don’t know if you ever…
Peter: Why should they lie?
Witt.: Give him a change to answer this….
Joran: …if you ever were interrogated by the police…. in a murder case…
Peter: (Unintelligible. Something like ‘Yes I was’…)
Joran: In a murder-case?!
Peter: No… Not where I was a suspect…
Joran: The way I was interrogated was no pleasure…
Peter: And you know….
Joran: The only thing you think of is wanting to go home… So there are things you say that…. Yes… If you’re being promised you can go home… or it can help to get you home… than there are things you say that… (Unintelligible.)
Peter: (Unintelligible.)
Witt.: (Unintelligible.) Peter! Especially you know that people confess a murder that they didn’t commit. (In the past PRdV has gotten some people out of jail that indeed had confessed to committing a murder after being put under very strong pressure.)
Peter: And what does that has to do with this?
Witt.: Because in this way you can miss the truth.
Peter: But… How DID you get home?
Joran: I just told you that!?!
Peter: But those two brother denie that and from the email… from the sms- and chat-contacts that were there it shows up clearly that they didn’t bring you home.
Joran: That’s what you draw from that… But that’s not true at all… I think it indeed DOES show that.
Pauw: Back to your father if you don’t mind… You were judge-in-training I believe… And now you’re lawyer… And you have a son… and that son is interrogated, and this son tells a story of which you later find out…. Did you tell hiim yourself (to Joran)… Or how did you find out that it was a lie? You know… Dropped her off at the hotel and so on…
Joran: Yes… He heard that from the police.
Pauw: What did you think then?
Paulus: Well we were angry… So then we learned that Joran didn’t tell the truth…


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 12, 2008, 01:13:45 PM
Is there any one person who could include in 1 post the link to the interview, the link to the followup interview, any links to the site with photos showing Peter wet or videos of the incident, a background of what the show was about, whose show it was, who was involved, when where, links to any transcripts etc. I know that we all sit here trying to dream up ways we can help Beth or one of Beths helpers, and providing a concise accurate post with the above information as soon as possible might be of much needed assistance. Whether or not she will find the post, I can't guarantee, but this is a lot of information for her to compile, credential, and digest on her own. I imagine she is preparing for Oprah possibly, is committed to her content, but should be interested in this late breaking news:))))))))) I also understand she isn't the most computer literate person in the world and what is easy for one of you might take her days:))

Anyway, if possible I would think she would greatly appreciate it and that it will be most helpful, even if it is not Oprah material::)) She is bound to be interested in it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Peaches on January 12, 2008, 01:16:27 PM
joran killed Natalee

probably in the same way as he did with this interview

when KILLER boy doesnt get his way he kills people, dogs, probably attempted to kill his brothers, thats why his CRAZY SICK DEMENTED parents put him in an apartment

i hate joran and the whole sloot family

Bet the farm.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: can on January 12, 2008, 01:24:03 PM
P.I., you are so right but do you ever see Anita doing the right thing?  I don't.  She is fighting for her family (or so she thinks) and it is a losing battle. She cannot keep her sporter in line. He can't even do an interview without losing it and there is nothing her or Paulus can do about it.  Her son has serious serious problems and only she can see to it he gets help that is so needed.  But I don't believe she is strong enough to do that for herself, her family and most importantly for Beth and Dave.
I agree with your take on Anita (fighting to keep her family together)...think she is failing miserably...Joran won't be controlled, not even in his parents presence.
The family won't be truly free, in my opinion, until the truth is known.

The family won't be free, in my opinun


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 12, 2008, 01:25:27 PM
Is there any one person who could include in 1 post the link to the interview, the link to the followup interview, any links to the site with photos showing Peter wet or videos of the incident, a background of what the show was about, whose show it was, who was involved, when where, links to any transcripts etc. I know that we all sit here trying to dream up ways we can help Beth or one of Beths helpers, and providing a concise accurate post with the above information as soon as possible might be of much needed assistance. Whether or not she will find the post, I can't guarantee, but this is a lot of information for her to compile, credential, and digest on her own. I imagine she is preparing for Oprah possibly, is committed to her content, but should be interested in this late breaking news:))))))))) I also understand she isn't the most computer literate person in the world and what is easy for one of you might take her days:))

Anyway, if possible I would think she would greatly appreciate it and that it will be most helpful, even if it is not Oprah material::)) She is bound to be interested in it.

Private Eye - check your email, I just sent you a bunch of stuff about the show.  We don't have photos or video of Joran thowing the wine at DeVries yet but hopefully we will before Monday.  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 12, 2008, 01:35:14 PM
Is there any one person who could include in 1 post the link to the interview, the link to the followup interview, any links to the site with photos showing Peter wet or videos of the incident, a background of what the show was about, whose show it was, who was involved, when where, links to any transcripts etc. I know that we all sit here trying to dream up ways we can help Beth or one of Beths helpers, and providing a concise accurate post with the above information as soon as possible might be of much needed assistance. Whether or not she will find the post, I can't guarantee, but this is a lot of information for her to compile, credential, and digest on her own. I imagine she is preparing for Oprah possibly, is committed to her content, but should be interested in this late breaking news:))))))))) I also understand she isn't the most computer literate person in the world and what is easy for one of you might take her days:))

Anyway, if possible I would think she would greatly appreciate it and that it will be most helpful, even if it is not Oprah material::)) She is bound to be interested in it.

Private Eye - check your email, I just sent you a bunch of stuff about the show.  We don't have photos or video of Joran thowing the wine at DeVries yet but hopefully we will before Monday.  :wink:

I did and there is nothing here yet. I sent you an email though to confirm the address. Thanks. I also noticed the additional transcript


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 12, 2008, 01:40:16 PM
Private Eye - just resent from my hotmail account.  You should have it now.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: robots on January 12, 2008, 01:42:26 PM
JORAN IS STILL TELLING MEGA LIES  


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: robots on January 12, 2008, 01:43:35 PM
how did you get home ?

satish


BULL CRAP


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 12, 2008, 01:44:07 PM
Is there any one person who could include in 1 post the link to the interview, the link to the followup interview, any links to the site with photos showing Peter wet or videos of the incident, a background of what the show was about, whose show it was, who was involved, when where, links to any transcripts etc. I know that we all sit here trying to dream up ways we can help Beth or one of Beths helpers, and providing a concise accurate post with the above information as soon as possible might be of much needed assistance. Whether or not she will find the post, I can't guarantee, but this is a lot of information for her to compile, credential, and digest on her own. I imagine she is preparing for Oprah possibly, is committed to her content, but should be interested in this late breaking news:))))))))) I also understand she isn't the most computer literate person in the world and what is easy for one of you might take her days:))

Anyway, if possible I would think she would greatly appreciate it and that it will be most helpful, even if it is not Oprah material::)) She is bound to be interested in it.

Private Eye - check your email, I just sent you a bunch of stuff about the show.  We don't have photos or video of Joran thowing the wine at DeVries yet but hopefully we will before Monday.  :wink:

I did and there is nothing here yet. I sent you an email though to confirm the address. Thanks. I also noticed the additional transcript

I apologize for my spam filter. that is embarrasing to me and insulting to you!!!!!!!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: yapperz1 on January 12, 2008, 01:46:32 PM
Hiya Monkeys. Been reading to catch up & wanted to say I think deVries should have goon child charged with assault for throwing something in his eyes. If this monster isn't stopped & soon, someone else will be harmed again.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: robots on January 12, 2008, 01:46:50 PM
is it safe to say...
that the next person interviewing killer joran wont allow any glasses of wine or sharp objects to be near joran  :cool:


GRETA IS A LOSER


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 12, 2008, 01:47:08 PM
Private Eye - don't feel bad, everything I send to Red goes to his spam filter too, LOLOL.   :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 12, 2008, 01:48:43 PM
If I was Anita, I would worry that Joran is going to get his self in another situation, unrelated to this, and instead of being jailed and possibly redeemed, someone else is going to kill him, or at least he is going to hurt someone else. And I would worry about the effect this has on the behavior of his younger brothers. I would be petrified of my child going to prison,  but I would be more petrified of hiim being killed, or ruining the lives of my other children. There is more than a relatively short span of Jorans freedom to consider here.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 12, 2008, 01:49:01 PM
Persistence update:

Update: Sat 12-Jan 1340 hrs
The progress of the past couple nights embolden the search team and fortified our confidence to begin work on the deepest portion of the search area. After the bathymetric survey, a plan of attack was drafted and we set out into the depths. The previous search areas gave us the impression the seabed was a worn, tired, old beast with a relatively subdued attitude and benign character. However, adventuring into the depths brought us straight into the grasp of a much different beast. We found ourselves in the lair of the Leviathan.

Descending into the depths, 3000 ft+ of cable spools off the winch. The Persistence slows as the towfish fades far behind the boat. After a long while, the seabed- smooth and welcoming begins to come into range. We descend further, but proceed with a tense sense of danger. It's suddenly clear the beast was waiting for us with baited breath. The towfish narrowly escapes being devoured by skirting between several massive fang-like rocks. A large curled stony-tongue extrudes beneath the sonar, passing through the beast's jaws. The Persistence quickly fires the throttles forward vaulting the sonar away from the sea floor. Without hesitation, the mighty beast gives chase with surprising agility. Skimming over ancient carbonate spines and a bifurcated tail of current-quarried rock the towfish takes flight, besting the Leviathan.

With the lessons and limits learned from the first pass, we strategically withdraw before moving in for the fight. Line by line, the Leviathan and the Persistence battle all night and through the morning. The beast knows that with one slip the towfish belongs to him. We know that if our assault is flawless, the Leviathan will yield its secrets.

http://nholloway.blogspot.com/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: NM on January 12, 2008, 01:52:57 PM
oh Wow!! quick comment and then I have to run...I'm late, I'm late!!!
I was watching the video of the sloots, look at paulus's stature, it is SOOOOOO the video casino!!!! His slouch...man..bet he wasn't thinking about that one!! Maybe we can do some comparisons.
See you all tonight Monkeys...have a great day!!!
Idstlou,
That is EXACTLY what I was thinking the whole time. I am 100% certain that is pvds in the casino video thanks to that interview last night.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: robots on January 12, 2008, 01:53:09 PM
the guilt of the SLOOTS comes shining thru with bright colors- once again

imgaine if you will the reasoning of why they would want to go thru this again being interviewed by peter d.

uhhhh.. so they can tell their story -- BULL CRAP BULL CRAP all over again.

if they really thought they had all the support from their friends and associates
they would never have done this interview, EVER

to what end ?? why ??   


naw... something more sinister going on


another shoe about to drop

 :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 12, 2008, 01:55:11 PM
The guy in the commercial riding his bike up to the house in the desert looks like PVDS. If it were I can imagine him sayin gthat none of our close neighbors object to Joran's behavior:))))))))))There are none!!!!!!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 12, 2008, 01:58:21 PM
Persistence update:

Update: Sat 12-Jan 1340 hrs
The progress of the past couple nights embolden the search team and fortified our confidence to begin work on the deepest portion of the search area. After the bathymetric survey, a plan of attack was drafted and we set out into the depths. The previous search areas gave us the impression the seabed was a worn, tired, old beast with a relatively subdued attitude and benign character. However, adventuring into the depths brought us straight into the grasp of a much different beast. We found ourselves in the lair of the Leviathan.

Descending into the depths, 3000 ft+ of cable spools off the winch. The Persistence slows as the towfish fades far behind the boat. After a long while, the seabed- smooth and welcoming begins to come into range. We descend further, but proceed with a tense sense of danger. It's suddenly clear the beast was waiting for us with baited breath. The towfish narrowly escapes being devoured by skirting between several massive fang-like rocks. A large curled stony-tongue extrudes beneath the sonar, passing through the beast's jaws. The Persistence quickly fires the throttles forward vaulting the sonar away from the sea floor. Without hesitation, the mighty beast gives chase with surprising agility. Skimming over ancient carbonate spines and a bifurcated tail of current-quarried rock the towfish takes flight, besting the Leviathan.

With the lessons and limits learned from the first pass, we strategically withdraw before moving in for the fight. Line by line, the Leviathan and the Persistence battle all night and through the morning. The beast knows that with one slip the towfish belongs to him. We know that if our assault is flawless, the Leviathan will yield its secrets.

http://nholloway.blogspot.com/

Those guys are best described as "Mans Man" and "a hell of a bunch of guys". They are simply great, caring, hardworking, extremely bright, articulate, and successful. My hat is off to them.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 12, 2008, 02:01:39 PM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/Fromtheshow.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 12, 2008, 02:04:27 PM
The more they blabber.......the more they look like asses and look even more guilty each and every time they open their mouths.
Keep talkin' Sloots......keep talkin'  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: yapperz1 on January 12, 2008, 02:05:35 PM
I think there will be a special reward in Heaven for all who have worked so relentlessly for answers to what happened to Natalee & justice for her.
There will also be a special place in Hell for all who have done everything to cover up what happened & stop the truth from coming out. MOO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 12, 2008, 02:06:54 PM
The more they blabber.......the more they look like asses and look even more guilty each and every time they open their mouths.
Keep talkin' Sloots......keep talkin'  :wink:


She definitely has the audiences attention. They are waiting to hear this explanation.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 12, 2008, 02:10:13 PM
Oprah made a huge mistake letting people post comments.....she has to be over run w/ this crap...
From RU>
gwen wrote:
Comment from Oprah.com.............

Reply 3. Re: Beth Holloway and Newsmaker Follow-Ups Jan 11, 2008 8:00 PM

First of all I would like to say that I don't like Joran van der Sloot. Even if he's not involved, which I highly doubt, he's arrogant when he should be humble. In interviews he tends to have a smug grin on his face. But to be honest, I don't like Beth Holloway either. Please before you make a judgement, let me clarify.

I can not imagine the pain she must endure. I mean, if my child would go missing, I would be beside myself. The reason I don't like her is the fact that she's not telling the truth. She painted her daughter as an All American Girl, who never misbehaved, did good at school and had a good relationship with her parents. The truth is, is that Natalee went to rehab just shortly before she went to Aruba. She ran away from home two times and had constant fights with her mother and stepfather. An Aruban taxidriver testified that she had Jug Twitty and a friend in her car and that they told her Natalee had been to rehab. Her friends and several island inhabitants testified to the police that she was doing belly shots with several guys in the bar. Even her friends told her to take it slow and not drink so much. She was seen smoking weed on the beach. Natalee was not the innocent little girl as her mother portrayed her to be. Of course I understand that she wants to protect her daughter, but frustrating police investigation by telling lies is unacceptable to me.

Furthermore, I dare you to find people on Aruba that still have contact with Beth on a friendly basis. The truth is, there aren't any. Beth Holloway has managed to insult almost every person that tried to help her. On Aruba, the Holloways have left a trail of people who were initially goodwilling towards them and helpfull but later broke off any contact. For instance, several Americans that live on the island, who helped her from the beginning, don't have any contact with her anymore. They just had enough of her antics. People who stood by her from the beginning but were not prepared to go along with her outrageous comments and lying. She even accused someone who helped her, an Aruban entrepeneur named Charles Croes of an attempted rape when he didn't want to help her anymore. Why didn't she press charges? Not because she didn't have the guts, she even told it to several people, but because she knew it was a lie.

Her hysterical behaviour and lying are disgusting. The attack on Aruba; the FBI was involved in this case from the get go (and so they have failed too because the case is still unsolved) but yet I don't see her blacklisting America does she? The second day Natalee was missing, she was hanging up posters with the text : Natalee kidnapped by Joran van der Sloot. I mean, that is just sickening. She attacked the Strategic Communications Task Force that was initiated by Aruba saying that it was started to 'to combat the negative media and to combat us'. But the truth is they paid hotel stays for her, arranged press conferences for her, collected the money donated to her. I mean why all the lying? Is it because they tried to protect her and nuanced her outrageous comments which in her turn she perceived to be a disloyal act? Jug Twitty said that Natalee didn't have a bank card with her ("it was still in her bedroom in Alabama") but in the cab he told his friend she had withdrawn money two times after her disappearance.

There are so many unsolved questions is this case. It's just so sad. I personally think that Joran van der Sloot and the Kalpoe Brothers ARE involved. I don't believe Joran and his attitude is despicable. I just don't trust Beth Holloway, I'm sorry. She has offended too may people. Not because she wanted the truth, but because she wanted to retain the image of her daughter. Understandable but not a justification for all the lies.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: dennisintn on January 12, 2008, 02:18:53 PM
Oprah made a huge mistake letting people post comments.....she has to be over run w/ this crap...
From RU>
gwen wrote:
Comment from Oprah.com.............

Reply 3. Re: Beth Holloway and Newsmaker Follow-Ups Jan 11, 2008 8:00 PM

First of all I would like to say that I don't like Joran van der Sloot. Even if he's not involved, which I highly doubt, he's arrogant when he should be humble. In interviews he tends to have a smug grin on his face. But to be honest, I don't like Beth Holloway either. Please before you make a judgement, let me clarify.

I can not imagine the pain she must endure. I mean, if my child would go missing, I would be beside myself. The reason I don't like her is the fact that she's not telling the truth. She painted her daughter as an All American Girl, who never misbehaved, did good at school and had a good relationship with her parents. The truth is, is that Natalee went to rehab just shortly before she went to Aruba. She ran away from home two times and had constant fights with her mother and stepfather. An Aruban taxidriver testified that she had Jug Twitty and a friend in her car and that they told her Natalee had been to rehab. Her friends and several island inhabitants testified to the police that she was doing belly shots with several guys in the bar. Even her friends told her to take it slow and not drink so much. She was seen smoking weed on the beach. Natalee was not the innocent little girl as her mother portrayed her to be. Of course I understand that she wants to protect her daughter, but frustrating police investigation by telling lies is unacceptable to me.

Furthermore, I dare you to find people on Aruba that still have contact with Beth on a friendly basis. The truth is, there aren't any. Beth Holloway has managed to insult almost every person that tried to help her. On Aruba, the Holloways have left a trail of people who were initially goodwilling towards them and helpfull but later broke off any contact. For instance, several Americans that live on the island, who helped her from the beginning, don't have any contact with her anymore. They just had enough of her antics. People who stood by her from the beginning but were not prepared to go along with her outrageous comments and lying. She even accused someone who helped her, an Aruban entrepeneur named Charles Croes of an attempted rape when he didn't want to help her anymore. Why didn't she press charges? Not because she didn't have the guts, she even told it to several people, but because she knew it was a lie.

Her hysterical behaviour and lying are disgusting. The attack on Aruba; the FBI was involved in this case from the get go (and so they have failed too because the case is still unsolved) but yet I don't see her blacklisting America does she? The second day Natalee was missing, she was hanging up posters with the text : Natalee kidnapped by Joran van der Sloot. I mean, that is just sickening. She attacked the Strategic Communications Task Force that was initiated by Aruba saying that it was started to 'to combat the negative media and to combat us'. But the truth is they paid hotel stays for her, arranged press conferences for her, collected the money donated to her. I mean why all the lying? Is it because they tried to protect her and nuanced her outrageous comments which in her turn she perceived to be a disloyal act? Jug Twitty said that Natalee didn't have a bank card with her ("it was still in her bedroom in Alabama") but in the cab he told his friend she had withdrawn money two times after her disappearance.

There are so many unsolved questions is this case. It's just so sad. I personally think that Joran van der Sloot and the Kalpoe Brothers ARE involved. I don't believe Joran and his attitude is despicable. I just don't trust Beth Holloway, I'm sorry. She has offended too may people. Not because she wanted the truth, but because she wanted to retain the image of her daughter. Understandable but not a justification for all the lies.

is "gwen" another one of the names julia/glenda uses?  or is this one sidalee or medleyrelay?
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 12, 2008, 02:19:57 PM
no gwen is gagal .....right Klaas?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: NM on January 12, 2008, 02:20:54 PM
snipped from EURobert's translation of interview

Quote
Pauw: Well, Deepak Kalpoe had stated that ‘her death was not good’?
Witt.: One of your friends there…
Joran: Yes, that uhhh… I don’t know either how that has went/gone (?) exactly… That’s something you should ask them.
Pauw: Didn’t you ask that to them ever? Like: ‘What have you said now?’
Joran: No (Unintelligible.)
Pauw: But what did you say than?
Joran: No I never asked him that. I uh, I mean we were so often interrogated by the police and we’ve in the beginning made so many statements… And I have allready said all there is to tell. So I think also… Yes… Why do I have to make the same statements twenty times to the police? I think that… the only thing they try is to find a little difference in them…
Pauw.: What we do here Joran, is just citing the report of the Judge-commissionar who has used that at Aruba. In this way Deepak Kalpoe stated that her death was not good, has Satish Kalpoe - which is the other friend or brother, what is it exactly? …
Joran: His brother.
Pauw: … Kalpoe thinks that suspect - you - has hit her to death, you yourself supposedly have stated about the burying of Natalee Holloway? That are some hard fact because of which you suggest that indeed something IS going on?

So VietVet's source in aruba was correct again. That jurin killed Natalee by hitting her to death.  Hence why many of the lies included Natalee having a head injury.  This does not seem like an accident to me.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 12, 2008, 02:21:04 PM
I don't think gwen made the Oprah post   she just posted it, lol.
Gwen and Julia like Joran  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 12, 2008, 02:22:59 PM
no gwen is gagal .....right Klaas?

Yep


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: NM on January 12, 2008, 02:47:03 PM
snipped from EURobert's translation of interview

Quote
Pauw: Well, Deepak Kalpoe had stated that ‘her death was not good’?
Witt.: One of your friends there…
Joran: Yes, that uhhh… I don’t know either how that has went/gone (?) exactly… That’s something you should ask them.
Pauw: Didn’t you ask that to them ever? Like: ‘What have you said now?’
Joran: No (Unintelligible.)
Pauw: But what did you say than?
Joran: No I never asked him that. I uh, I mean we were so often interrogated by the police and we’ve in the beginning made so many statements… And I have allready said all there is to tell. So I think also… Yes… Why do I have to make the same statements twenty times to the police? I think that… the only thing they try is to find a little difference in them…
Pauw.: What we do here Joran, is just citing the report of the Judge-commissionar who has used that at Aruba. In this way Deepak Kalpoe stated that her death was not good, has Satish Kalpoe - which is the other friend or brother, what is it exactly? …
Joran: His brother.
Pauw: … Kalpoe thinks that suspect - you - has hit her to death, you yourself supposedly have stated about the burying of Natalee Holloway? That are some hard fact because of which you suggest that indeed something IS going on?

So VietVet's source in aruba was correct again. That jurin killed Natalee by hitting her to death.  Hence why many of the lies included Natalee having a head injury.  This does not seem like an accident to me.
Also, looks like dk knows/witness/co-killer in Natalee's death.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 12, 2008, 02:49:38 PM
Oprah made a huge mistake letting people post comments.....she has to be over run w/ this crap...
From RU>
gwen wrote:
Comment from Oprah.com.............

Reply 3. Re: Beth Holloway and Newsmaker Follow-Ups Jan 11, 2008 8:00 PM

First of all I would like to say that I don't like Joran van der Sloot. Even if he's not involved, which I highly doubt, he's arrogant when he should be humble. In interviews he tends to have a smug grin on his face. But to be honest, I don't like Beth Holloway either. Please before you make a judgement, let me clarify.

I can not imagine the pain she must endure. I mean, if my child would go missing, I would be beside myself. The reason I don't like her is the fact that she's not telling the truth. She painted her daughter as an All American Girl, who never misbehaved, did good at school and had a good relationship with her parents. The truth is, is that Natalee went to rehab just shortly before she went to Aruba. She ran away from home two times and had constant fights with her mother and stepfather. An Aruban taxidriver testified that she had Jug Twitty and a friend in her car and that they told her Natalee had been to rehab. Her friends and several island inhabitants testified to the police that she was doing belly shots with several guys in the bar. Even her friends told her to take it slow and not drink so much. She was seen smoking weed on the beach. Natalee was not the innocent little girl as her mother portrayed her to be. Of course I understand that she wants to protect her daughter, but frustrating police investigation by telling lies is unacceptable to me.

Furthermore, I dare you to find people on Aruba that still have contact with Beth on a friendly basis. The truth is, there aren't any. Beth Holloway has managed to insult almost every person that tried to help her. On Aruba, the Holloways have left a trail of people who were initially goodwilling towards them and helpfull but later broke off any contact. For instance, several Americans that live on the island, who helped her from the beginning, don't have any contact with her anymore. They just had enough of her antics. People who stood by her from the beginning but were not prepared to go along with her outrageous comments and lying. She even accused someone who helped her, an Aruban entrepeneur named Charles Croes of an attempted rape when he didn't want to help her anymore. Why didn't she press charges? Not because she didn't have the guts, she even told it to several people, but because she knew it was a lie.

Her hysterical behaviour and lying are disgusting. The attack on Aruba; the FBI was involved in this case from the get go (and so they have failed too because the case is still unsolved) but yet I don't see her blacklisting America does she? The second day Natalee was missing, she was hanging up posters with the text : Natalee kidnapped by Joran van der Sloot. I mean, that is just sickening. She attacked the Strategic Communications Task Force that was initiated by Aruba saying that it was started to 'to combat the negative media and to combat us'. But the truth is they paid hotel stays for her, arranged press conferences for her, collected the money donated to her. I mean why all the lying? Is it because they tried to protect her and nuanced her outrageous comments which in her turn she perceived to be a disloyal act? Jug Twitty said that Natalee didn't have a bank card with her ("it was still in her bedroom in Alabama") but in the cab he told his friend she had withdrawn money two times after her disappearance.

There are so many unsolved questions is this case. It's just so sad. I personally think that Joran van der Sloot and the Kalpoe Brothers ARE involved. I don't believe Joran and his attitude is despicable. I just don't trust Beth Holloway, I'm sorry. She has offended too may people. Not because she wanted the truth, but because she wanted to retain the image of her daughter. Understandable but not a justification for all the lies.


Gwen, Beth is not out to win a popularity contest or friends. She is out to find justice for Natalee or at least the answers as to what happened, whatever those answers might be. Since you have said that you yourself think Joran is involved, why not forget whether or not you like Beth, and join forces to find justice for Natalee? I am curious though, if we review all of your posts on RU are we going to be able to confirm your dislike and suspicion of Joran? Maybe someone from SM can search and compile your posts to see if you speak the truth. It is easy enough to accomplish. Assuming you are truthful, despite your difference of opinion and your contempt of Beth, she would welcome to join forces with you on your common mission.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: crazybabyborg on January 12, 2008, 02:54:23 PM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/Fromtheshow.jpg)

That guy in the lower left right corner looks like a Taco head. (Dyslexic, sorry!)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: San on January 12, 2008, 03:06:29 PM
snipped from EURobert's translation of interview

Quote
Pauw: Well, Deepak Kalpoe had stated that ‘her death was not good’?
Witt.: One of your friends there…
Joran: Yes, that uhhh… I don’t know either how that has went/gone (?) exactly… That’s something you should ask them.
Pauw: Didn’t you ask that to them ever? Like: ‘What have you said now?’
Joran: No (Unintelligible.)
Pauw: But what did you say than?
Joran: No I never asked him that. I uh, I mean we were so often interrogated by the police and we’ve in the beginning made so many statements… And I have allready said all there is to tell. So I think also… Yes… Why do I have to make the same statements twenty times to the police? I think that… the only thing they try is to find a little difference in them…
Pauw.: What we do here Joran, is just citing the report of the Judge-commissionar who has used that at Aruba. In this way Deepak Kalpoe stated that her death was not good, has Satish Kalpoe - which is the other friend or brother, what is it exactly? …
Joran: His brother.
Pauw: … Kalpoe thinks that suspect - you - has hit her to death, you yourself supposedly have stated about the burying of Natalee Holloway? That are some hard fact because of which you suggest that indeed something IS going on?

So VietVet's source in aruba was correct again. That jurin killed Natalee by hitting her to death.  Hence why many of the lies included Natalee having a head injury.  This does not seem like an accident to me.

This was never an accident that is why we are all here because we know it wasn't.  They could only wish for it to be an accident.  They have been trying the accident theory from day one.  They can't even prove it.

I always believed what VietVet said about Joran hitting Natalee.

This is why I'm convinced Deepak was the one who confessed.

I feel Joran would have never ever confess because he knows he would be toast.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: San on January 12, 2008, 03:08:26 PM
I have been mostly behind but Joran has always wanted to throw water on DeVries.  If my memory serves me right Joran said he was going to throw water on DeVries from his window of his apartment when DeVries first went to his home.  So this thought has been in Joran's head for a while now.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: wreck on January 12, 2008, 03:14:36 PM
Persistence update:

Update: Sat 12-Jan 1340 hrs
The progress of the past couple nights embolden the search team and fortified our confidence to begin work on the deepest portion of the search area. After the bathymetric survey, a plan of attack was drafted and we set out into the depths. The previous search areas gave us the impression the seabed was a worn, tired, old beast with a relatively subdued attitude and benign character. However, adventuring into the depths brought us straight into the grasp of a much different beast. We found ourselves in the lair of the Leviathan.

Descending into the depths, 3000 ft+ of cable spools off the winch. The Persistence slows as the towfish fades far behind the boat. After a long while, the seabed- smooth and welcoming begins to come into range. We descend further, but proceed with a tense sense of danger. It's suddenly clear the beast was waiting for us with baited breath. The towfish narrowly escapes being devoured by skirting between several massive fang-like rocks. A large curled stony-tongue extrudes beneath the sonar, passing through the beast's jaws. The Persistence quickly fires the throttles forward vaulting the sonar away from the sea floor. Without hesitation, the mighty beast gives chase with surprising agility. Skimming over ancient carbonate spines and a bifurcated tail of current-quarried rock the towfish takes flight, besting the Leviathan.

With the lessons and limits learned from the first pass, we strategically withdraw before moving in for the fight. Line by line, the Leviathan and the Persistence battle all night and through the morning. The beast knows that with one slip the towfish belongs to him. We know that if our assault is flawless, the Leviathan will yield its secrets.

http://nholloway.blogspot.com/

Those guys are best described as "Mans Man" and "a hell of a bunch of guys". They are simply great, caring, hardworking, extremely bright, articulate, and successful. My hat is off to them.
If he is half as adept at his job as he is a talented writer -- there is no doubt they will find her if she is there!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 12, 2008, 03:25:24 PM
Posted on the front page of SM by MAGS (from the NL):

Last night in Holland, Joran van der Sloot and his parents were interviewed on TV by the team Pauw en Witteman. Crime investigator Peter R de Vries was also there. The boys parents did all they could to make Joran look like a nice stable boy who would not harm a soul. To the question: did you ever doubt your son? the father answered: never. The mother said: I did have my doubts at first and thought: oh, no, not again…”

Joran showed upo with a baseballcap on his head, not a common attire in Holland.
He would never clarify questions asked about his lies. But what did happen…. Right after the show closed he threw a glass of red wine into the face and eyes of Peter R. de Vries.
Not a very nice stable boy now, is he?

The father, btw, had advised his son when he was arrested the second time this november, to not say anything. Why? was the question…. “because everything had already been said”…
had it….? this is what so many people wonder. He lied about how he came home that night, he refuses to confess how he did come home.

what a nightmare for the parents and friends.
mags in holland



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Kat_Gram on January 12, 2008, 03:26:54 PM
So Joran threw water or wine in DeVries's face !  Way to go Joran, showed yourself to be an angry idiot ! Impulsive and angry when doesn't get own way, say it isn't so Joe !
So, some Aruban taxi driver, we don't know what language he spoke, is the source for this rehab rumor. Oh gee, then it must be true.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Observer on January 12, 2008, 03:42:10 PM
San:

Your right,I also recall Joran saying he wanted to throw water on De Vries when he came to Jorans Apt in Holland. He probably thought he was impressing his pimp friends when he threw wine on De Vries face


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 12, 2008, 03:43:57 PM
Posted by EURobert on the front page of SM - transcription of the show last night:

Transscript and translation of last nights Pauw en Witteman tv-show (Please excuse me for all the grammatical and typing errors that will be in here; it’s to time-consuming to do it flawless…. Mr. Witteman’s first name is Paul so I’ll call PaulvdS: ‘Paulus’; that’s easier for me… To not get confused…)

Witteman: Good evening. Yes, Joran van der Sloot was brought back to Aruba end of november to be interrogated. That interrogation produced nothing. He was let go and the case was dismissed.
Pauw: Joran is here, together with his father Paul and with his mother Anita to have as they themselves say, their last tv-interview about this case.
Witt.: Here as well is Peter R. de Vries who has made a television-documentairy about the NH-case and the role JvdS played, and who has his doubts. He has called Joran a lier, so their is something to be discussed.
Pauw: (Looking at Joran) Yes, well.., you can confess now, so we have that behind us…? … … … … Are that the jokes you hear the most? Or what are you bothered with more Joran?
Joran: Well, I’m not really bothered by others.. But you have to keep making jokes. As you just said yourself… else you don’t get through all this.
Pauw: Do you have the feeling now that the whole matter is over now… or do you still have the feeling that if you somewhere hear a sirene… that could be for me?
Joran: Well… Not really like that but uh it’s something that you’ll never forget. It’s something… It sticks with you all the time. You best just keep going on but… It’s something you won’t easily forget. But I think in the judicial sense it now is over yes.
Pauw: Are you addressed on this often?
Paulus: Uhhmmm… No, actually not so… I’m not addressed on this often. Uhh… All-days live goes it’s normal way… And the people at Aruba have had it with this.
Witt.: Yes, they’ve had it with this… But do they believe you?
Paulus: Uuhhm… I think so.
Witt.: So if you walk the streets you don’t think: ‘Oh they look at me… Maybe indeed a murderer… Or some other creepy-person…?’
Paulus: No, I don’t have that feeling at all. No it’s on the contrary very remarkable… uhhh… such a small community as Aruba is… and as it has had very much negative effects because of all this… That they keep and kept being supportive towards us. That has uh amazed us and… it has… our hearts… strengthened… as well. (Unintelligible.)
Witt.: Were you bothered by it?
Anita: Uhhm… Well I wasn’t bothered by it so much… You know that there is talk… I mean in every community… there is talk about what has happened. Actually… uhm, uhm, it was more like… the people they were very supportive. Neighbours, people you didn’t know at all, that still came to you… We lived on Aruba for almost twenty years… And people know Joran from the time he was very small… They saw Paul or me pushing the pram… And a former teacher of him that came by who said: ‘Well this can not at all be possible… Such a sweet kid…’ So that you felt as if this story must have had a different cause… Something else is going on… And… uh, the support… Well it sounds very strange but… it was very big. Really very big.
Witt.: Well, now the case is dismissed, in the judicial sense over with.., is that the reason you agreed to sit at the table with Peter R. de Vries?
Paulus: Well yes we have allways uh, said that uh, as soon as uh, this case us no longer in court.., when uh, the OM uh, is no longer prosecuting it, we uh, are willing to give uh, another interview, in uh, a reliable tv-show. Uh… To show we have nothing to hide. (I have to skip all the ‘uhs’ here now… the’re just to much of them.) And it is so that all this publicity has had a very big impact on this case. It has even at some point taken over it. We thought that as long as this case is going on it was not right to get in the lamplights - however at some times it was necessary - because we didn’t want to frustrate this investigation in any way.
Witt.: Yes, well uhm, Peter R. de Vries is here… He’s tried before… on Aruba as well, to get in contact with you… We’ll show a little clip how that sometimes went. (Clip of PRdVries at Jorans student-house in Arnhem, confronting Joran with fabricated photo of him with Natalee.)
Pauw: Well there were, before we started this show, some jokes made at this table like: ‘Well Peter… where’s your hidden camera…’ Well that hidden camera is not here right now. Peter, you have tried to get in contact with the VanderSloot-family a couple of times to have interviews… So you didn’t just walk behind them with your hidden camera… Do you understand something of the answer of Paul van der Sloot?
PRdV: No, to be honest, I don’t understand very much of that. I think it’s strange to hear him say here, he has nothing to hide, and he didn’t want to frustrate the investigation… But than I have to notice that they did nothing to help the case. Because Joran vdS has when he was at Aruba the last weeks, and could explain all his actions / conducts, maybe could end the mysteries, maybe could shed some light on that.., he has for weeks ‘kept his molars close on top of each-other’ (dutch expression = didn’t speak). Has not spoken a word, not answered one question! That is not what PvdS says…… this nice saying ‘We have nothing to hide’. Then I think… If you are innocent… and you did nothing wrong… why don’t you just tell your story, why don’t you answer questions from the police? The fact that you just kept your jaws closed (dutch expr.) I think in these circumstances is very strange…..
Pauw: Let’s agree that somewhat later in this show on this question, this is one of your questions but you have more of them, get answers from Joran or his father or mother… But first we…
Peter: Yes…. Just give hime some time to think…..
Pauw: Yes… So you have time to find the ‘right’ answer… (LOL) But firs before we talk about this whole matter let’s give the people at home a small summary of what has all happened and what is known… (CLIP of the NH-case)
Witt.: Were you suprised that you were re-arrested?
Joran: yes, off course… I uh… hadn’t expected that at all… I thought they were joking me… when the police arrived at the door… telling me ‘you’re under arrest again’… Because yes, uh I knew they could have nothing on me… so why would they again….
Witt.: Well it was said that there were new facts, so there were new grounds to arrest you again and take you to Aruba to interrogate you.
Joran: Yes, but I knew that would be impossible… that… that…
Witt.: But what than did you think… if it was impossible, what would be the reason they arrested you again?
Joran: Well I don’t know… Maybe I thought somebody has falsely stated against me, or something bad was said about me. I don’t know… Something like that… That’s what I thought… In that direction… Maybe something like that.
Witt.: And what did it turn out to be?! Because… You got there… You were interrogated…
Joran.: Well there turned out to be abslolutely nothing. No new evidence at all… Just old statements that they looked at in a different way.
Witt.: How did the interrogation go?
Joran: Well, just as mr. De Vries said, I just kept silent. I didn’t say anything.
Witt.: Why not?
Joran: I don’t have any trust anymore in the OM at Aruba… I think that they…. they are not trying to find the truth… or trying to find out what happened in this case. They are just literally doing…. they just want somebody to hang for this…

——-
More to come….

Joran: … they just want somebody to hang for this… They just want for their own egos to… That they themselves come good out of this…
Witt.: Even if it is an innocent person as well…
Joran: Yes, even if it is an innocent person as well. I’m convinced of that.
Peter: Well I think it’s a bit awkward that you say the Aruban OM is not trustworthy where it was you who lied all the time?!
Joran: Yes I lied and I admitt that but there were reasons for that and you don’t know them and….
Peter: Yes! I would like to know those reasons! … To lie about what you have done where you supposedly have nothing to hide!? Why do you have to lie then, tell me that?!
Joran: Well I did that extensivly in my book allready. And you have read that so you allready know the reasons.
Peter: But you are here now to tell your story or…?!!!
Witt.: Let’s agree that we the second part of the show will give you the opportunity to do that but first let’s tell the story of the VdSloot-family according to the rules we’ve in advance agreed on with Joran namely that we first look at what actually happened. Because you say I kept my mouth shut. I didn’t tell them anything more and they didn’t come up with anything new. Were those interrogations despite that tough?
Joran: Uhmmmmm… Well in fact compared to the first ones they were not. They turned out less tough than I’d expected. There was a Dutch detective-team that told THEIR story and in fact it was just speculating what they did. The allready talked in terms of ‘a girl that was dead’, you name it, where in fact it’s just a missing girl.
Pauw: That is all in the file is it… Because in the file of the judge-commissionar it says that it has to be put first that there are strong indications that Natalee is dead.
Joran: I would like to now that know as well…
Pauw: Because there is now evidence you know of she’s dead?
Joran: (Shakes his head.)
Pauw: Well, Deepak Kalpoe had stated that ‘her death was not good’?
Witt.: One of your friends there…
Joran: Yes, that uhhh… I don’t know either how that has went/gone (?) exactly… That’s something you should ask them.
Pauw: Didn’t you ask that to them ever? Like: ‘What have you said now?’
Joran: No (Unintelligible.)
Pauw: But what did you say than?
Joran: No I never asked him that. I uh, I mean we were so often interrogated by the police and we’ve in the beginning made so many statements… And I have allready said all there is to tell. So I think also… Yes… Why do I have to make the same statements twenty times to the police? I think that… the only thing they try is to find a little difference in them…
Pauw.: What we do here Joran, is just citing the report of the Judge-commissionar who has used that at Aruba. In this way Deepak Kalpoe stated that her death was not good, has Satish Kalpoe - which is the other friend or brother, what is it exactly? …
Joran: His brother.
Pauw: … Kalpoe thinks that suspect - you - has hit her to death, you yourself supposedly have stated about the burying of Natalee Holloway? That are some hard fact because of which you suggest that indeed something IS going on?
Joran: Yes, … I, I, … It’s three years ago now and in the beginning we’ve been really treated tough by the police and made to say things that we… wouldn’t say ourselves. And yes I have the feeling they made me want to say things that weren’t true.
Pauw: Did you never say… Or have you never spoken about burying Natalee Holloway?
Joran: No I have never discussed that with the pollice.
Anita: Can I go into that for a moment?
Witt.: Off course.
Anita: Uhmmm… When Joran was arrested for the first time I was the only one who was allowed to see him. Because he was a minor and they wanted to keep out Paul because of his function. Uhm, I have spoken to Joran some times but only short, some 15 to twenty minutes. And I am his mother. I love him very dearly. And I’m really convinced he wouldn’t do anything to that girl. These first emotions, these are very important to me… to see them in him as well… For a moment I doubted him. I’ve thought… By Jingo, could an accident have happened? Has something happened? Doesn’t he want to tell… He is just having his final exams… He knows he has final-exams-celebrations… He has a girlfriend… so he’s cheated on her… His father will be very angry with him… Etc. etc…. So I very directly spoke with him and one of the confrontations… that I came over there… And I was taken by an Aruban detective… And Joran was very upset… He before that was beset for hours and hours… Words were put in his mouth… which he never said… that were put to paper but that he never signed. And they showed that to me…: ‘This is what he said!’
Pauw: Well these are maybe not the most subtle moments in this conversation but Joran, you visited a psychiatrist because you were lying all the time.
Joran: No… That was not the reason why I visited the psychiatrist. I’ve been two times to a childrens psychiatrist but that was because we had some things going on within our family.
Anita: I can explain that as well… So you can hear it from my own mouth… Paul was in Holland for the Judges-training and I had to deal with three children in my own… And Joran as many seventeen year olds… I myself work with teens… And uh… he was not the easiest one. Besides that we had problems with… I had some problems with him… That he came home way to late… Uhm… I’m rather strict… Maybe even sometimes I was a little to strict… And at a certain point after talking about it with a friend of mine, maybe it’s good when we have some consults with a youth-psychiatrist. Because I just want that he has a goal in life… that he thinks well what he wants with his life and all this ‘going out’ I just think bad about that. And at that time he started playing poker in the casino and I don’t want my son being in the casino! So I contacted I youth-psychiatrist… He wasn’t 18 yet, he still was seventeen… He went there twice, that’s correct and we had one conlusive-conversation after that. And that was it… So it was really not just about lying…
Peter: What I now think is striking is that they have no confidence what soever in the judicial authorities. where at the same time it hasn’t been a long time ago that Paul vd Sloot did his very best to work in that organisation.
Pauw: As a judge you mean…
Peter: As a judge. I think it’s striking that suddenly there is so little confidence in that organisation…
Paulus: Well look uhhhh… Mister De Vries can’t hear that good… If he would have listened carefully he would have heard that Joran said that he didn’t have any confidence in the OM (public pros.)! That’s what Joran has said. Joran didn’t talk about the judicial authorities. What you see now.., what has happened is that luckely we have judicial authorities… And we sit here again! So in the end it’s because of the judicial authorities that all has ended well.
Witt.: The judge has said: the case must be dismissed, there is to little evidence, Joran is free! Well let’s for a minute get back to that prosecution before Joran was released because Joran just said they wanted to frame me; that’s what it came to it.


More to come…

 NOTE - i'LL ADD TO THIS POST WHEN MORE IS TRANSLATED AND POSTED ON THE FRONT PAGE OF SM

More of the show translated by EURobert:

Next bit…

Witt.: Well let’s for a minute get back to that prosecution before Joran was released because Joran just said they wanted to frame me; that’s what it turned out to be.
Joran: Well it was more like… In the beginning… the first time I was arrested they were rather tough with us: they sticked pictures of the girl to the wall… And uh, they told me as well… these two brothers… They played us off against eachother. Suggested that we had said things about eachother that were… That weren’t true all the time…
Witt.: But you all had learned the same story?
Joran: Yes.., we had agreed on… we had agreed on that… in advance…
Pauw: That you had taken her to a hotel… And that she was so unstable she had to hold on to a pillar… And I think that all three of you up to the pillar, told the same story?!
Joran: Yes but everyone had added their own things to it…
Pauw: But why did you do that? Why did you agree on making up this particular story?
Joran: Yes.., yes… Why this story? I just was scared at that moment… Those parents suddenly were at our house… And yes… I didn’t have a clue either what to do next.
Pauw: And so you decide the three of you to make up one story and this is how we’re going to tell it.
Peter: You just can tell the truth can you, when nothing happened? There’s no reason to lie is there?
Joran: Yes, I don’t think the truth sounds that good if you have to say you left a girl at the beach.
Peter: So you think a lie sounds better than the truth?
Joran: Well I didn’t know how serious this all was. I didn’t know there was a serious problem.
Peter: That’s exacly why it is so strange to lie!? When you don’t know that there is a serious problem there is no reason to lie at all!? That’s exactly the strange thing of lying here!?
Pauw: Peter… Peter you a father of a teenager, well maybe that’s a bit insipid, father of a young daughter… You can imagine you do something… leaving a girl at the beach… Let’s just tell I decently brought her back…. Such a little lie you can imagine can you?
Peter: No, I can’t imagine that Jeroen… I think you must try to see the psychology behind that. When he doesn’t know what has happened to that girl and she, after she slept away her drunkenness, simply shows up again then he is really caught lying! The fact that he nevertheless tells this lie you can interpret as: he knew he wouldn’t get caught telling this lie. Because he knew Natalee wouldn’t show up again!
Witt.: Don’t you think you look at this in a to much argumentual way? We talk about a seventeen year old boy who is confronted with the parents of girl that possibly has disappeared, maybe think that she is murdered and look at him, then you get in a panic don’t you think? In that case you may not immediatly tell them ‘Yes, I left her at the beach’.
Peter: Well I think it’s always the best option to simply tell the truth especially when you’re…
Witt.: But as a reality-reporter you must know there are exeptions to this rule…?
Peter: Yes, and most of the time they have good reasons.. But in a situation that nothing has happened.., there were no wrongdoings.., the girl herself wanted to stay there.., or get home by herself… than that’s what you say don’t you? The fact that you don’t do that AND THE THREE OF YOU IN A VERY SMART WAY MAKE UP A STORY… I think that’s suspicious.
Joran: I think it’s bad that I lied myself as well and that’s what I regret the most. If I had came forward with the truth at the beginning I think everything would have gone very different. And I think that as well is one off the reasons mister De Vries thinks the way he thinks but when you just look at the facts in this case… The timeperiod I was with this girl, being home after that, going to school the next day, and other things… What then do you try to say I have done?
Peter: If you want to discuss the facts, than tell me how you got home that night?
Joran: I was taken home by Satish…
Peter: Yes… And he denies that! He says I didn’t take him to his home at all! And first you stated that you were brought home by Deepak!!?? Not by Satish!!! Those are things as well that put you in a…..
Joran: Mister De Vries… I don’t know if you ever…
Peter: Why should they lie?
Witt.: Give him a change to answer this….
Joran: …if you ever were interrogated by the police…. in a murder case…
Peter: (Unintelligible. Something like ‘Yes I was’…)
Joran: In a murder-case?!
Peter: No… Not where I was a suspect…
Joran: The way I was interrogated was no pleasure…
Peter: And you know….
Joran: The only thing you think of is wanting to go home… So there are things you say that…. Yes… If you’re being promised you can go home… or it can help to get you home… than there are things you say that… (Unintelligible.)
Peter: (Unintelligible.)
Witt.: (Unintelligible.) Peter! Especially you know that people confess a murder that they didn’t commit. (In the past PRdV has gotten some people out of jail that indeed had confessed to committing a murder after being put under very strong pressure.)
Peter: And what does that has to do with this?
Witt.: Because in this way you can miss the truth.
Peter: But… How DID you get home?
Joran: I just told you that!?!
Peter: But those two brother denie that and from the email… from the sms- and chat-contacts that were there it shows up clearly that they didn’t bring you home.
Joran: That’s what you draw from that… But that’s not true at all… I think it indeed DOES show that.
Pauw: Back to your father if you don’t mind… You were judge-in-training I believe… And now you’re lawyer… And you have a son… and that son is interrogated, and this son tells a story of which you later find out…. Did you tell hiim yourself (to Joran)… Or how did you find out that it was a lie? You know… Dropped her off at the hotel and so on…
Joran: Yes… He heard that from the police.
Pauw: What did you think then?
Paulus: Well we were angry… So then we learned that Joran didn’t tell the truth…


More on the show from EURobert:

Paulus: Well we were angry… So when we learned that Joran didn’t tell the truth Anita and I just were very angry at Joran.
Pauw: A girl is missing and your son is a suspect and on top of that he has lied…
Paulus: Yes, yes, for us that was incomprehensible. That, that, … not just that he lied but he kept that lie up / kept on lying for a long time. That was… yes that was incomprehensible to us. We were very angry about that at that moment.
Pauw: Did you at that point say to him: ‘as long as there is no body there is no case’?
Paulus: No, I’ve never said that. That’s a term that you drop here now but…
Pauw: It’s put in the book like this as well…
Paulus: Yes.., but that term was used by the then Public Prosecutor, uh after I uh.. had had an interview with Twan Huys (dutch tv), of which the message was… well, we’re not the victims… let’s first concentrate on this girl… Let’s try to find that girl back. And she then, the next day, didn’t pick up that message and she said “Yes, this father, this (Unintelligible.) concerned father. But, he has instructed these guys: ‘No corps no case’, and that’s the reason why they are stating this way.” That was the only thing, and that off course is the heart of the matter, that I from the start on have said, this is a missing-case! This is not a criminal case. And that in my opinion is the big mistake that the OM has made: from the start they were talking about murder, manslaughter, kidnapping, rape… when there was no evidence for that. And later everything is getting in a certain light and now two and a half years later that has been corrected, but that has been very unfortunate.
Peter: I don’t think were are here now to assume this girl is still alive?!
Witt.: We’ll get to that later. Let’s get back a minute. You worked there as a back up judge. Imagine… This is a strictly hypothetical question… Imagine Joran telling you, a confidant par excelence in this family maybe, listen dad, I did something horrible… What would you have done in that case? I would have gone with Joran to the Public Prosecutor! Did you discuss this scenario with one another?
Paulus: What do you mean?
Anita: (Unintelligible. Something like: I, as a parent? Yes)
Witt.: You would agree with that?
Anita: Yes.
Witt.: You would have informed the police against your son?
Anita: Yes.
Joran: And I uh, can confirm that…. (LOL)
Witt.: You mean they would have threatened you with that?
Joran: No I think they would have done that yes.
Paulus: There would have been no doubts about that. I btw was amazed that a lot of people think that you could be able to hide something like this. For me that would have been absolutely strange. There would have been absolutely no doubts about that.
Pauw: Have you have doubts? Was there a moment you thought maybe he did it? That maybe an accident had happened and …
Paulus: No actually I have never doubted it one time.
Anita: I did.
Paulus: I have always seen the way Joran was with girls… He was not able to do that… I’m sure of that. He would, if anything would have happened to that girl, he would have acted accordingly.
Witt.: Yes, let’s talk a minute how Joran was with girls… He’s in his book very frank about it… For him it apparently was or is easy to seduce girls… So easy that you can question yourself if it always happened with the decency that has to go with that proces in comparison with someone who has much more difficulties getting in contact with girls and is much more courteously. For example you don’t write very respectfully about Natalee…
Joran: No… I am very respectfull towards girls. I have for example never pushed a girl (can’t hear it 100% right and don’t know what he means with that). Or did something wrong to a girl.
Witt.: Well there was talk of “the bitch this” and “the bitch that”. And you hardly knew this girl and still you were intimate with her. And after that leaving her there alone? These are not things that proof you have high respects for women.
Joran: No but it symply was so that I was in the casino and I was by her girlfriends invited to go out. And one thig led to the other and she wanted to come with us as well. She invited me to dance with her. Not that I didn’t want it but….
Witt.: No, it’s about this Joran. Your father says: ‘What we know of Joran is that he doesn’t do wrong things with girls. Opposite to that is the fact that you left her at the beach, you cheated on your own girlfriend not just with Natalee but with another girl as well… That is not evidence of a principle respect you have for these women?!
Joran: Well I can not, uh, I uh, well uh… Well maybe you’re right about that. Yes.
Witt.: But returning to the father, maybe you exaggerate the ‘respectfull’ way Joran behaves towards women?
Paulus: I have always seen that Joran respectfully treated girls. And we’ve discussed that as well. So for me it’s incomprehensible that a girl that wasn’t totally well was left behind by him.
Anita: He has had two times a longer relationship and that girl visited our house, we knew her parents, we knew that girl. And he is still in contact with that girl and we are - she still calls me ‘Mam’. He was with her for nine months, that girl was sixteen… That girl has very strongly defended Joran after that. After that there were some other dates. I think, and again I work with teens, 16, 17 and 18-year olds, that is very normal behaviour for a 17 year old boy. Well there were many telephone-calls normally, like: ‘Is Joran at home?’, ‘Can I speak to Joran?’ Well at a certain point Joran had his own telephone so we didn’t keep an eye on it anymore. But I have never seen, nor at our school because, he was at my school, I did see him a lot there off course, again I’ve never seen anything of bad behaviour…
Witt.: Have you ever thought that maybe an accident had happened because…
Anita: Yes that indeed I’ve thought for a moment… Because… Joran leaving a girl behind at the beach… That’s impossible because we allways say: Walk up with a girl when you lead her out by the door… So we didn’t bring him up like that and I then was furious at him, both of us were. So for a short while I thought that something could have happened…
Witt.: With alcohol and drugs maybe? …
Anita: Maybe. Well… With drugs… no… But alcohol… Those doubts were there for a while when I was in Holland but there I thought that the girl would soon show up again. But after three days it all became very worrying.
Witt.: Okay, we now go as agreed with Peter R. de Vries about his approach and your reaction to that but first we’ll watch todays news. (Newsclip)
Pauw: Okay, Peter R. de Vries as we announced earlier



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: San on January 12, 2008, 03:45:04 PM
Posted on the front page of SM by MAGS (from the NL):

Last night in Holland, Joran van der Sloot and his parents were interviewed on TV by the team Pauw en Witteman. Crime investigator Peter R de Vries was also there. The boys parents did all they could to make Joran look like a nice stable boy who would not harm a soul. To the question: did you ever doubt your son? the father answered: never. The mother said: I did have my doubts at first and thought: oh, no, not again…”

Joran showed upo with a baseballcap on his head, not a common attire in Holland.
He would never clarify questions asked about his lies. But what did happen…. Right after the show closed he threw a glass of red wine into the face and eyes of Peter R. de Vries.
Not a very nice stable boy now, is he?

The father, btw, had advised his son when he was arrested the second time this november, to not say anything. Why? was the question…. “because everything had already been said”…
had it….? this is what so many people wonder. He lied about how he came home that night, he refuses to confess how he did come home.

what a nightmare for the parents and friends.
mags in holland


 :shock: :shock: OMG what an idiot she is.

Not again what Anita?  How many times did he take girls to your home to rape?  How many times did he beat people up?  How many times did you clean his mess?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Buckeye on January 12, 2008, 03:49:54 PM
So which comes first....the chicken or the egg??  Does Gielen document the Sloot/Refro storyline or do Sloot/Refro follow the Gielen storyline?

More of the interview per marco at RU.

         
marco PostPosted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 2:53 pm       

Interview, starting at 40.55 minutes.

Q: different things, are also in Joran's book, if they did not only shine the light on Joran then they could have investigated other things, has that happened?

Paul: No, even stronger than that, now Joran is not a suspect any longer, the OM gave a press conference, he still is the person we are interested in.
After 2 1/2 years of pressure methods have been used, for me, I don't understand this.
At this moment after 2 1/2 years somebody following so much, that you then as the OM has to say, don't only take the decision to not any more to prosecute, it has to be this boy is innocent.

De Vries: I'm glad that you, with theories like these, you are not a judge.  :lol:

Joran: 10. million dollars has been spend.

Question: What needs to be investigated?

Paul: What stands out is, there is no profile of the girl, what kind of girl was she, who where her contacts, something very simple, the computer of the girl has never been researched, I nowhere saw the family of the girl has been investigated, her friends.
Where you really have to start the investigation, is with the people closest to the girl, and really after 10 million dollars, that has not happened.

Host + de vries: No, you start with the person who was last seen with that person.

Question: What could have been found if you had started with this?

Anita: We know that people have been seen on the beach.
We know that the electronic swipe card from the hotel has been used, within a time frame she could have walked, we know that the card has been used 3 times.
We know that security guards where in the neighborhood.
It looks like she could have used the card, to get into the room.

(De Vries: other people could have used that card)

Joran: her room was on the ground floor.

Anita: You can walk straight from the beach to her room.
There are about 7 or 8 statements.
That witnesses have seen her walking.

Host: Someone from a gas station says: I saw Natalee H. the day after she disappeared with an other man, and later the same man came back without the girl.
Has there not been a good investigation?

Paul and Anita both: No.

Paul: There is a video, and people are stating that Natalee is in there, after she disappeared.
We have asked to see the video, but we never saw it.

Anita: The video from the HI, yes.The hall from the HI.
The poster we just saw from the missed, (They showed the missing poster on tv),
There are several versions of a poster.
Beth H came with her family to my school.
This is 48 hours later, yes.
She was on on the island very quickly, which I would do also, she came inside the school, she brought with her the "kidnapped: poster.
but there is an other poster with "Hootie call big hootie".
Then you think: Oh this girl has run away.
She also hung posters in the school with: kidnapped by Joran vander Sloot, within a very short period of time.
I thought, you can't do this, this is strange.
I had, and still have the feeling that there is more.
Behind all this is a different story, not behind Joran, but on the other side.
I would like to see this investigated.

Host: The mother was very (fel/vel) strong (?)

they show an interview with Beth:
What I like to say to Joran is, tell what you did with my daughter when you raped her, finished raping her, what did you do with her. That's all we're asking. We want to know where she is.



I don't for one minute believe that Anita does not know the origins of the Hootie poster and the use of the keycard.  This is purposeful disinformation.  Too bad the Dutch media didn't buy it either.

She is evil....and...the apple doesn't fall far from the tree.  She has been the victim ever since "the girl" disappeared.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: dennisintn on January 12, 2008, 03:51:14 PM

jvds' new "look" is probably aimed at the "killer grunge" look.  add in some gang signs and you've got him pegged.
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: San on January 12, 2008, 03:54:48 PM
At the 20.55 minute mark of the show you could see Joran getting irritated with DeVries he facial expressions say it all.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: memphis on January 12, 2008, 03:56:30 PM
Not quite caught up, but OMG!!

Please, VDS's, PLEASE, PLEASE do more public interviews to "prove your innocence."

AhhHahahahaahhhahaHA!

OMG!
Besides the wine throwing, there are so many things in that interview that are sketchy. They are so arrogant and yet, so foolish.

Talk some more you foolish Vandersloots.  :smt077

Yet, they still fail to refer to Natalee as that girl. ARGH! May they rot in hell!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 12, 2008, 04:06:09 PM
Posted on the front page of SM by MAGS (from the NL):

Last night in Holland, Joran van der Sloot and his parents were interviewed on TV by the team Pauw en Witteman. Crime investigator Peter R de Vries was also there. The boys parents did all they could to make Joran look like a nice stable boy who would not harm a soul. To the question: did you ever doubt your son? the father answered: never. The mother said: I did have my doubts at first and thought: oh, no, not again…”

Joran showed upo with a baseballcap on his head, not a common attire in Holland.
He would never clarify questions asked about his lies. But what did happen…. Right after the show closed he threw a glass of red wine into the face and eyes of Peter R. de Vries.
Not a very nice stable boy now, is he?

The father, btw, had advised his son when he was arrested the second time this november, to not say anything. Why? was the question…. “because everything had already been said”…
had it….? this is what so many people wonder. He lied about how he came home that night, he refuses to confess how he did come home.

what a nightmare for the parents and friends.
mags in holland


 :shock: :shock: OMG what an idiot she is.

Not again what Anita?  How many times did he take girls to your home to rape?  How many times did he beat people up?  How many times did you clean his mess?

We know she checks all of the girls panties that he collects as trophies. It seems that alone would spark one of those mother son talks about respecting women, sexuality and love, maturity, consent etc.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 12, 2008, 04:07:56 PM
When Beth is asked, if she is asked, what she thinks about Joran, she should respectfully demur to the video with Peter DeVries before further comment. Let Joran speak for himself.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 12, 2008, 04:21:43 PM
When Beth is asked, if she is asked, what she thinks about Joran, she should respectfully demur to the video with Peter DeVries before further comment. Let Joran speak for himself.

She should also refer to Greta's interview where he states We have done this 20 times before and nothing happened.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: memphis on January 12, 2008, 04:22:47 PM
When Beth is asked, if she is asked, what she thinks about Joran, she should respectfully demur to the video with Peter DeVries before further comment. Let Joran speak for himself.

She should also refer to Greta's interview where he states We have done this 20 times before and nothing happened.

Absolutely!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 12, 2008, 04:25:28 PM
Oprah made a huge mistake letting people post comments.....she has to be over run w/ this crap...
From RU>
gwen wrote:
Comment from Oprah.com.............

Reply 3. Re: Beth Holloway and Newsmaker Follow-Ups Jan 11, 2008 8:00 PM

First of all I would like to say that I don't like Joran van der Sloot. Even if he's not involved, which I highly doubt, he's arrogant when he should be humble. In interviews he tends to have a smug grin on his face. But to be honest, I don't like Beth Holloway either. Please before you make a judgement, let me clarify.

I can not imagine the pain she must endure. I mean, if my child would go missing, I would be beside myself. The reason I don't like her is the fact that she's not telling the truth. She painted her daughter as an All American Girl, who never misbehaved, did good at school and had a good relationship with her parents. The truth is, is that Natalee went to rehab just shortly before she went to Aruba. She ran away from home two times and had constant fights with her mother and stepfather. An Aruban taxidriver testified that she had Jug Twitty and a friend in her car and that they told her Natalee had been to rehab. Her friends and several island inhabitants testified to the police that she was doing belly shots with several guys in the bar. Even her friends told her to take it slow and not drink so much. She was seen smoking weed on the beach. Natalee was not the innocent little girl as her mother portrayed her to be. Of course I understand that she wants to protect her daughter, but frustrating police investigation by telling lies is unacceptable to me.

Furthermore, I dare you to find people on Aruba that still have contact with Beth on a friendly basis. The truth is, there aren't any. Beth Holloway has managed to insult almost every person that tried to help her. On Aruba, the Holloways have left a trail of people who were initially goodwilling towards them and helpfull but later broke off any contact. For instance, several Americans that live on the island, who helped her from the beginning, don't have any contact with her anymore. They just had enough of her antics. People who stood by her from the beginning but were not prepared to go along with her outrageous comments and lying. She even accused someone who helped her, an Aruban entrepeneur named Charles Croes of an attempted rape when he didn't want to help her anymore. Why didn't she press charges? Not because she didn't have the guts, she even told it to several people, but because she knew it was a lie.

Her hysterical behaviour and lying are disgusting. The attack on Aruba; the FBI was involved in this case from the get go (and so they have failed too because the case is still unsolved) but yet I don't see her blacklisting America does she? The second day Natalee was missing, she was hanging up posters with the text : Natalee kidnapped by Joran van der Sloot. I mean, that is just sickening. She attacked the Strategic Communications Task Force that was initiated by Aruba saying that it was started to 'to combat the negative media and to combat us'. But the truth is they paid hotel stays for her, arranged press conferences for her, collected the money donated to her. I mean why all the lying? Is it because they tried to protect her and nuanced her outrageous comments which in her turn she perceived to be a disloyal act? Jug Twitty said that Natalee didn't have a bank card with her ("it was still in her bedroom in Alabama") but in the cab he told his friend she had withdrawn money two times after her disappearance.

There are so many unsolved questions is this case. It's just so sad. I personally think that Joran van der Sloot and the Kalpoe Brothers ARE involved. I don't believe Joran and his attitude is despicable. I just don't trust Beth Holloway, I'm sorry. She has offended too may people. Not because she wanted the truth, but because she wanted to retain the image of her daughter. Understandable but not a justification for all the lies.


renho wrote this? What a whiney little witch!! Yea..thats going to go over well with Oprah???!!!  :roll: :roll: :roll:
keep talking sloots, and keep typing renho....you are making yourselves look much worse than anyone else could!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 12, 2008, 04:26:57 PM
The nerve of "zipper open" Paulus stating they need to investigate this family.  THEY were not in Aruba.  And How does he know anything about how Joran treats girls?  Maybe he was in on this with J2K afterall.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 12, 2008, 04:29:09 PM
Ocean, anything new to report today?  I am in awe of all of you for what you are doing for this family.  The dedication is amazing. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 12, 2008, 04:50:11 PM
ldstlou......Renfro didn't write it....and gwen didn't write it...
gwen posted it at RU ....she got the post from Oprah's site. The person who wrote it is someone who doesn't care for Joran ( or so they say).
It IS obvious it was someone FROM RU though.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: CJ1 on January 12, 2008, 04:52:44 PM
It strikes me from the Pauw & Witteman video that JVDS is trying to change his appearance, and not for the better.  JVDS seems more smug and arrogant than ever.  It's all a joke to him.  There were a lot of sly looks going around that table.  I enjoyed de Vries' piercing looks.  And from JVDS's mouth..."in a murder case".  Murder?...really Joran?...tell me about it.  MOO 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: LilPuma on January 12, 2008, 04:55:05 PM
The nerve of "zipper open" Paulus stating they need to investigate this family.  THEY were not in Aruba.  And How does he know anything about how Joran treats girls?  Maybe he was in on this with J2K afterall.

I like the way one of the interviewers showed Paulus how his son is anything but respectful of women.  As if Paulus didn't already know. 



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: LilPuma on January 12, 2008, 05:04:44 PM
ldstlou......Renfro didn't write it....and gwen didn't write it...
gwen posted it at RU ....she got the post from Oprah's site. The person who wrote it is someone who doesn't care for Joran ( or so they say).
It IS obvious it was someone FROM RU though.

Throughout this case, Beth, Natalee, Dave, Tim Miller, TJ Ward, Art Wood, Natalee's classmates and the chaperones have been accused of all the things those in Aruba are guilty of.   Every charge of wrongdoing in Aruba was countered by making that same accusation of someone supporting Beth.  Also, Anita, in this interview, goes on about the outpouring of support.  Remember Joran telling us how supportive people were of him but some wouldn't speak to his father?  Which is it?  Contradictions in their own words continue.  Best of all, the interview showed that the parents of Joran VDS are the ones painting a false picture of their sociopath.  And Joran showed he will get physical when angry.  Throwing a drink in someone's face is the best he could do in front of all those people, but he had to get physical because that's who he is. 

Kalpoe:  Joran is crazy.  (not about kissing)
Kalpoe:  If they find the girl, they'll see that @#$%.  (Joran hit her)
J2K:  She fell and hit her head.  (We've known all along)
Van der Straaten:  Because I know more about this case than you do.  (So did he)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: memphis on January 12, 2008, 05:09:24 PM
I'm embarrassed to ask this, but where is the actual video of the interview? Is it in this thread? I thought there were just the transcripts.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: LilPuma on January 12, 2008, 05:10:48 PM
Site meter says 71% U.S and 12% Netherlands. 

Maybe someone knows Welcome in Dutch?  I only know Welcome and Bien Venidos.   :2doh:




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: memphis on January 12, 2008, 05:15:42 PM
Nevermind. I just found it. Thread #21.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: LilPuma on January 12, 2008, 05:16:41 PM
I'm embarrassed to ask this, but where is the actual video of the interview? Is it in this thread? I thought there were just the transcripts.


I think it's on the Pauw en Witteman website.  Maybe?  I've been reading.
http://pauwenwitteman.vara.nl/uitzending.php?id=274


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Observer on January 12, 2008, 05:19:35 PM
Site meter says 71% U.S and 12% Netherlands. 

Maybe someone knows Welcome in Dutch?  I only know Welcome and Bien Venidos.   :2doh:




Welkom and Hallo to all Dutch Vistors  :wink: I posted our addy in that dutch website last night,so they may be checking out the site.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: LilPuma on January 12, 2008, 05:26:18 PM
Welkom to all Dutch guests.  And thank you to all who are translating for us. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 12, 2008, 05:46:02 PM
Joran said that he remained silent when he was rearrested
because there was nothing else to say.....he had already said it all.

What happened to "someday I will tell what happened, but I am not
ready to do that now." that he stated in the Inside Edition interview?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 12, 2008, 05:50:54 PM
Joran showed not only his ass and true character, but also what a sissy he is when he ran off after throwing the water at DeVries. He was afraid DeVries would kick his ass:))))))))))Real tuff Joran. Just like a 2 year old


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 12, 2008, 05:52:11 PM
After watching this does anyone still believe that the Aruban police couldn't break Joran into talking?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: sirensong on January 12, 2008, 05:53:10 PM
JVDS behaving badly once the cameras are off.  Who would have thought? :roll:

Yes, Peaches and then he expects us all to believe he was "scared" of the Americans at his house that night, that is why he had to lie.  He is such a POS.  I hope Anita gets what she wishes for-an investigation into the investigation.  Don't these interviews give us such a  great look at what   kind of people the   Sloots really are?  Keep talking a..holes!!  Telling DeVries  to apologize-does  he get that kind of  behavior from his dad?  Probably.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: sirensong on January 12, 2008, 05:58:25 PM
I know we have discussed this -- but how is Devries "perceived" in The Netherlands? Is he more like Geraldo or more like Mike Wallace?

I have respect for his tenacity in investigating some crimes, but on the whole, I have close to zero respect for the guy.

LOL, how about Joran.   Respect for him?  Anita, Paul?  After reading about that incident, I find it curious this it what you would say.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Observer on January 12, 2008, 05:59:05 PM
After watching this does anyone still believe that the Aruban police couldn't break Joran into talking?

I am convinced Joran did break in the 1st or second day of interrogation. Before that he told a lot more of the truth before his statements were changed or destroyed.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: CJ1 on January 12, 2008, 06:03:56 PM
After watching this does anyone still believe that the Aruban police couldn't break Joran into talking?

Aruban and Dutch police might not be able to, but just about anyone else could.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: sirensong on January 12, 2008, 06:04:49 PM
I know we have discussed this -- but how is Devries "perceived" in The Netherlands? Is he more like Geraldo or more like Mike Wallace?

I have respect for his tenacity in investigating some crimes, but on the whole, I have close to zero respect for the guy.

most of the people i know say the opposite

but thats ok, people can heve their own opinion

i have zero respect for the aruba LE as well as the Dutch LE

 :cool:

Exactly, Robots.  Might I add, we have no respect for the Judges, the prosecutors or the so called "laws" that the Dutch seem to think so highly of.  The justice system depends on the honesty, integrity and truthfullness of the people in office.  Perfect set up for corruption.  JMO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 12, 2008, 06:06:05 PM
ldstlou......Renfro didn't write it....and gwen didn't write it...
gwen posted it at RU ....she got the post from Oprah's site. The person who wrote it is someone who doesn't care for Joran ( or so they say).
It IS obvious it was someone FROM RU though.

gotcha thanks, I always get renho and gwen mixed up...imagine that!!! lol


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 12, 2008, 06:11:35 PM
Posted on the front page of SM by MAGS (from the NL):

Last night in Holland, Joran van der Sloot and his parents were interviewed on TV by the team Pauw en Witteman. Crime investigator Peter R de Vries was also there. The boys parents did all they could to make Joran look like a nice stable boy who would not harm a soul. To the question: did you ever doubt your son? the father answered: never. The mother said: I did have my doubts at first and thought: oh, no, not again…”

Joran showed upo with a baseballcap on his head, not a common attire in Holland.
He would never clarify questions asked about his lies. But what did happen…. Right after the show closed he threw a glass of red wine into the face and eyes of Peter R. de Vries.
Not a very nice stable boy now, is he?

The father, btw, had advised his son when he was arrested the second time this november, to not say anything. Why? was the question…. “because everything had already been said”…
had it….? this is what so many people wonder. He lied about how he came home that night, he refuses to confess how he did come home.

what a nightmare for the parents and friends.
mags in holland



remember our discussions in the lounge about trusting your gut!!!
HEEEELLLLLOOOO ANITA!!! You thought "oh know not again" because your gut told you the truth!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tylergal on January 12, 2008, 06:16:33 PM
Did I hear correctly today on Fox, that Anita wants the investigation investigated?  Hmmm, oh, please.  Anita, you can join OJ, another perpetrator who wants the investigation investigated since he is the victim, like your son, Anita.  All stalkers and especially stalkers who murder, are said to claim they are the victims rather than the perpetrators.  Makes me go hmmm.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: San on January 12, 2008, 06:20:12 PM
Did I hear correctly today on Fox, that Anita wants the investigation investigated?  Hmmm, oh, please.  Anita, you can join OJ, another perpetrator who wants the investigation investigated since he is the victim, like your son, Anita.  All stalkers and especially stalkers who murder, are said to claim they are the victims rather than the perpetrators.  Makes me go hmmm.

The Sloots gave an interview Tyler.  Do you want the link to the translation.

There is also a video of the interview.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: San on January 12, 2008, 06:21:18 PM
The show is up

http://player.omroep.nl/?aflID=6213320

Here is the link to the interview again just in case people missed it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: San on January 12, 2008, 06:22:43 PM
Posted by EURobert on the front page of SM - transcription of the show last night:

Transscript and translation of last nights Pauw en Witteman tv-show (Please excuse me for all the grammatical and typing errors that will be in here; it’s to time-consuming to do it flawless…. Mr. Witteman’s first name is Paul so I’ll call PaulvdS: ‘Paulus’; that’s easier for me… To not get confused…)

Witteman: Good evening. Yes, Joran van der Sloot was brought back to Aruba end of november to be interrogated. That interrogation produced nothing. He was let go and the case was dismissed.
Pauw: Joran is here, together with his father Paul and with his mother Anita to have as they themselves say, their last tv-interview about this case.
Witt.: Here as well is Peter R. de Vries who has made a television-documentairy about the NH-case and the role JvdS played, and who has his doubts. He has called Joran a lier, so their is something to be discussed.
Pauw: (Looking at Joran) Yes, well.., you can confess now, so we have that behind us…? … … … … Are that the jokes you hear the most? Or what are you bothered with more Joran?
Joran: Well, I’m not really bothered by others.. But you have to keep making jokes. As you just said yourself… else you don’t get through all this.
Pauw: Do you have the feeling now that the whole matter is over now… or do you still have the feeling that if you somewhere hear a sirene… that could be for me?
Joran: Well… Not really like that but uh it’s something that you’ll never forget. It’s something… It sticks with you all the time. You best just keep going on but… It’s something you won’t easily forget. But I think in the judicial sense it now is over yes.
Pauw: Are you addressed on this often?
Paulus: Uhhmmm… No, actually not so… I’m not addressed on this often. Uhh… All-days live goes it’s normal way… And the people at Aruba have had it with this.
Witt.: Yes, they’ve had it with this… But do they believe you?
Paulus: Uuhhm… I think so.
Witt.: So if you walk the streets you don’t think: ‘Oh they look at me… Maybe indeed a murderer… Or some other creepy-person…?’
Paulus: No, I don’t have that feeling at all. No it’s on the contrary very remarkable… uhhh… such a small community as Aruba is… and as it has had very much negative effects because of all this… That they keep and kept being supportive towards us. That has uh amazed us and… it has… our hearts… strengthened… as well. (Unintelligible.)
Witt.: Were you bothered by it?
Anita: Uhhm… Well I wasn’t bothered by it so much… You know that there is talk… I mean in every community… there is talk about what has happened. Actually… uhm, uhm, it was more like… the people they were very supportive. Neighbours, people you didn’t know at all, that still came to you… We lived on Aruba for almost twenty years… And people know Joran from the time he was very small… They saw Paul or me pushing the pram… And a former teacher of him that came by who said: ‘Well this can not at all be possible… Such a sweet kid…’ So that you felt as if this story must have had a different cause… Something else is going on… And… uh, the support… Well it sounds very strange but… it was very big. Really very big.
Witt.: Well, now the case is dismissed, in the judicial sense over with.., is that the reason you agreed to sit at the table with Peter R. de Vries?
Paulus: Well yes we have allways uh, said that uh, as soon as uh, this case us no longer in court.., when uh, the OM uh, is no longer prosecuting it, we uh, are willing to give uh, another interview, in uh, a reliable tv-show. Uh… To show we have nothing to hide. (I have to skip all the ‘uhs’ here now… the’re just to much of them.) And it is so that all this publicity has had a very big impact on this case. It has even at some point taken over it. We thought that as long as this case is going on it was not right to get in the lamplights - however at some times it was necessary - because we didn’t want to frustrate this investigation in any way.
Witt.: Yes, well uhm, Peter R. de Vries is here… He’s tried before… on Aruba as well, to get in contact with you… We’ll show a little clip how that sometimes went. (Clip of PRdVries at Jorans student-house in Arnhem, confronting Joran with fabricated photo of him with Natalee.)
Pauw: Well there were, before we started this show, some jokes made at this table like: ‘Well Peter… where’s your hidden camera…’ Well that hidden camera is not here right now. Peter, you have tried to get in contact with the VanderSloot-family a couple of times to have interviews… So you didn’t just walk behind them with your hidden camera… Do you understand something of the answer of Paul van der Sloot?
PRdV: No, to be honest, I don’t understand very much of that. I think it’s strange to hear him say here, he has nothing to hide, and he didn’t want to frustrate the investigation… But than I have to notice that they did nothing to help the case. Because Joran vdS has when he was at Aruba the last weeks, and could explain all his actions / conducts, maybe could end the mysteries, maybe could shed some light on that.., he has for weeks ‘kept his molars close on top of each-other’ (dutch expression = didn’t speak). Has not spoken a word, not answered one question! That is not what PvdS says…… this nice saying ‘We have nothing to hide’. Then I think… If you are innocent… and you did nothing wrong… why don’t you just tell your story, why don’t you answer questions from the police? The fact that you just kept your jaws closed (dutch expr.) I think in these circumstances is very strange…..
Pauw: Let’s agree that somewhat later in this show on this question, this is one of your questions but you have more of them, get answers from Joran or his father or mother… But first we…
Peter: Yes…. Just give hime some time to think…..
Pauw: Yes… So you have time to find the ‘right’ answer… (LOL) But firs before we talk about this whole matter let’s give the people at home a small summary of what has all happened and what is known… (CLIP of the NH-case)
Witt.: Were you suprised that you were re-arrested?
Joran: yes, off course… I uh… hadn’t expected that at all… I thought they were joking me… when the police arrived at the door… telling me ‘you’re under arrest again’… Because yes, uh I knew they could have nothing on me… so why would they again….
Witt.: Well it was said that there were new facts, so there were new grounds to arrest you again and take you to Aruba to interrogate you.
Joran: Yes, but I knew that would be impossible… that… that…
Witt.: But what than did you think… if it was impossible, what would be the reason they arrested you again?
Joran: Well I don’t know… Maybe I thought somebody has falsely stated against me, or something bad was said about me. I don’t know… Something like that… That’s what I thought… In that direction… Maybe something like that.
Witt.: And what did it turn out to be?! Because… You got there… You were interrogated…
Joran.: Well there turned out to be abslolutely nothing. No new evidence at all… Just old statements that they looked at in a different way.
Witt.: How did the interrogation go?
Joran: Well, just as mr. De Vries said, I just kept silent. I didn’t say anything.
Witt.: Why not?
Joran: I don’t have any trust anymore in the OM at Aruba… I think that they…. they are not trying to find the truth… or trying to find out what happened in this case. They are just literally doing…. they just want somebody to hang for this…

——-
More to come….

Joran: … they just want somebody to hang for this… They just want for their own egos to… That they themselves come good out of this…
Witt.: Even if it is an innocent person as well…
Joran: Yes, even if it is an innocent person as well. I’m convinced of that.
Peter: Well I think it’s a bit awkward that you say the Aruban OM is not trustworthy where it was you who lied all the time?!
Joran: Yes I lied and I admitt that but there were reasons for that and you don’t know them and….
Peter: Yes! I would like to know those reasons! … To lie about what you have done where you supposedly have nothing to hide!? Why do you have to lie then, tell me that?!
Joran: Well I did that extensivly in my book allready. And you have read that so you allready know the reasons.
Peter: But you are here now to tell your story or…?!!!
Witt.: Let’s agree that we the second part of the show will give you the opportunity to do that but first let’s tell the story of the VdSloot-family according to the rules we’ve in advance agreed on with Joran namely that we first look at what actually happened. Because you say I kept my mouth shut. I didn’t tell them anything more and they didn’t come up with anything new. Were those interrogations despite that tough?
Joran: Uhmmmmm… Well in fact compared to the first ones they were not. They turned out less tough than I’d expected. There was a Dutch detective-team that told THEIR story and in fact it was just speculating what they did. The allready talked in terms of ‘a girl that was dead’, you name it, where in fact it’s just a missing girl.
Pauw: That is all in the file is it… Because in the file of the judge-commissionar it says that it has to be put first that there are strong indications that Natalee is dead.
Joran: I would like to now that know as well…
Pauw: Because there is now evidence you know of she’s dead?
Joran: (Shakes his head.)
Pauw: Well, Deepak Kalpoe had stated that ‘her death was not good’?
Witt.: One of your friends there…
Joran: Yes, that uhhh… I don’t know either how that has went/gone (?) exactly… That’s something you should ask them.
Pauw: Didn’t you ask that to them ever? Like: ‘What have you said now?’
Joran: No (Unintelligible.)
Pauw: But what did you say than?
Joran: No I never asked him that. I uh, I mean we were so often interrogated by the police and we’ve in the beginning made so many statements… And I have allready said all there is to tell. So I think also… Yes… Why do I have to make the same statements twenty times to the police? I think that… the only thing they try is to find a little difference in them…
Pauw.: What we do here Joran, is just citing the report of the Judge-commissionar who has used that at Aruba. In this way Deepak Kalpoe stated that her death was not good, has Satish Kalpoe - which is the other friend or brother, what is it exactly? …
Joran: His brother.
Pauw: … Kalpoe thinks that suspect - you - has hit her to death, you yourself supposedly have stated about the burying of Natalee Holloway? That are some hard fact because of which you suggest that indeed something IS going on?
Joran: Yes, … I, I, … It’s three years ago now and in the beginning we’ve been really treated tough by the police and made to say things that we… wouldn’t say ourselves. And yes I have the feeling they made me want to say things that weren’t true.
Pauw: Did you never say… Or have you never spoken about burying Natalee Holloway?
Joran: No I have never discussed that with the pollice.
Anita: Can I go into that for a moment?
Witt.: Off course.
Anita: Uhmmm… When Joran was arrested for the first time I was the only one who was allowed to see him. Because he was a minor and they wanted to keep out Paul because of his function. Uhm, I have spoken to Joran some times but only short, some 15 to twenty minutes. And I am his mother. I love him very dearly. And I’m really convinced he wouldn’t do anything to that girl. These first emotions, these are very important to me… to see them in him as well… For a moment I doubted him. I’ve thought… By Jingo, could an accident have happened? Has something happened? Doesn’t he want to tell… He is just having his final exams… He knows he has final-exams-celebrations… He has a girlfriend… so he’s cheated on her… His father will be very angry with him… Etc. etc…. So I very directly spoke with him and one of the confrontations… that I came over there… And I was taken by an Aruban detective… And Joran was very upset… He before that was beset for hours and hours… Words were put in his mouth… which he never said… that were put to paper but that he never signed. And they showed that to me…: ‘This is what he said!’
Pauw: Well these are maybe not the most subtle moments in this conversation but Joran, you visited a psychiatrist because you were lying all the time.
Joran: No… That was not the reason why I visited the psychiatrist. I’ve been two times to a childrens psychiatrist but that was because we had some things going on within our family.
Anita: I can explain that as well… So you can hear it from my own mouth… Paul was in Holland for the Judges-training and I had to deal with three children in my own… And Joran as many seventeen year olds… I myself work with teens… And uh… he was not the easiest one. Besides that we had problems with… I had some problems with him… That he came home way to late… Uhm… I’m rather strict… Maybe even sometimes I was a little to strict… And at a certain point after talking about it with a friend of mine, maybe it’s good when we have some consults with a youth-psychiatrist. Because I just want that he has a goal in life… that he thinks well what he wants with his life and all this ‘going out’ I just think bad about that. And at that time he started playing poker in the casino and I don’t want my son being in the casino! So I contacted I youth-psychiatrist… He wasn’t 18 yet, he still was seventeen… He went there twice, that’s correct and we had one conlusive-conversation after that. And that was it… So it was really not just about lying…
Peter: What I now think is striking is that they have no confidence what soever in the judicial authorities. where at the same time it hasn’t been a long time ago that Paul vd Sloot did his very best to work in that organisation.
Pauw: As a judge you mean…
Peter: As a judge. I think it’s striking that suddenly there is so little confidence in that organisation…
Paulus: Well look uhhhh… Mister De Vries can’t hear that good… If he would have listened carefully he would have heard that Joran said that he didn’t have any confidence in the OM (public pros.)! That’s what Joran has said. Joran didn’t talk about the judicial authorities. What you see now.., what has happened is that luckely we have judicial authorities… And we sit here again! So in the end it’s because of the judicial authorities that all has ended well.
Witt.: The judge has said: the case must be dismissed, there is to little evidence, Joran is free! Well let’s for a minute get back to that prosecution before Joran was released because Joran just said they wanted to frame me; that’s what it came to it.


More to come…

 NOTE - i'LL ADD TO THIS POST WHEN MORE IS TRANSLATED AND POSTED ON THE FRONT PAGE OF SM

More of the show translated by EURobert:

Next bit…

Witt.: Well let’s for a minute get back to that prosecution before Joran was released because Joran just said they wanted to frame me; that’s what it turned out to be.
Joran: Well it was more like… In the beginning… the first time I was arrested they were rather tough with us: they sticked pictures of the girl to the wall… And uh, they told me as well… these two brothers… They played us off against eachother. Suggested that we had said things about eachother that were… That weren’t true all the time…
Witt.: But you all had learned the same story?
Joran: Yes.., we had agreed on… we had agreed on that… in advance…
Pauw: That you had taken her to a hotel… And that she was so unstable she had to hold on to a pillar… And I think that all three of you up to the pillar, told the same story?!
Joran: Yes but everyone had added their own things to it…
Pauw: But why did you do that? Why did you agree on making up this particular story?
Joran: Yes.., yes… Why this story? I just was scared at that moment… Those parents suddenly were at our house… And yes… I didn’t have a clue either what to do next.
Pauw: And so you decide the three of you to make up one story and this is how we’re going to tell it.
Peter: You just can tell the truth can you, when nothing happened? There’s no reason to lie is there?
Joran: Yes, I don’t think the truth sounds that good if you have to say you left a girl at the beach.
Peter: So you think a lie sounds better than the truth?
Joran: Well I didn’t know how serious this all was. I didn’t know there was a serious problem.
Peter: That’s exacly why it is so strange to lie!? When you don’t know that there is a serious problem there is no reason to lie at all!? That’s exactly the strange thing of lying here!?
Pauw: Peter… Peter you a father of a teenager, well maybe that’s a bit insipid, father of a young daughter… You can imagine you do something… leaving a girl at the beach… Let’s just tell I decently brought her back…. Such a little lie you can imagine can you?
Peter: No, I can’t imagine that Jeroen… I think you must try to see the psychology behind that. When he doesn’t know what has happened to that girl and she, after she slept away her drunkenness, simply shows up again then he is really caught lying! The fact that he nevertheless tells this lie you can interpret as: he knew he wouldn’t get caught telling this lie. Because he knew Natalee wouldn’t show up again!
Witt.: Don’t you think you look at this in a to much argumentual way? We talk about a seventeen year old boy who is confronted with the parents of girl that possibly has disappeared, maybe think that she is murdered and look at him, then you get in a panic don’t you think? In that case you may not immediatly tell them ‘Yes, I left her at the beach’.
Peter: Well I think it’s always the best option to simply tell the truth especially when you’re…
Witt.: But as a reality-reporter you must know there are exeptions to this rule…?
Peter: Yes, and most of the time they have good reasons.. But in a situation that nothing has happened.., there were no wrongdoings.., the girl herself wanted to stay there.., or get home by herself… than that’s what you say don’t you? The fact that you don’t do that AND THE THREE OF YOU IN A VERY SMART WAY MAKE UP A STORY… I think that’s suspicious.
Joran: I think it’s bad that I lied myself as well and that’s what I regret the most. If I had came forward with the truth at the beginning I think everything would have gone very different. And I think that as well is one off the reasons mister De Vries thinks the way he thinks but when you just look at the facts in this case… The timeperiod I was with this girl, being home after that, going to school the next day, and other things… What then do you try to say I have done?
Peter: If you want to discuss the facts, than tell me how you got home that night?
Joran: I was taken home by Satish…
Peter: Yes… And he denies that! He says I didn’t take him to his home at all! And first you stated that you were brought home by Deepak!!?? Not by Satish!!! Those are things as well that put you in a…..
Joran: Mister De Vries… I don’t know if you ever…
Peter: Why should they lie?
Witt.: Give him a change to answer this….
Joran: …if you ever were interrogated by the police…. in a murder case…
Peter: (Unintelligible. Something like ‘Yes I was’…)
Joran: In a murder-case?!
Peter: No… Not where I was a suspect…
Joran: The way I was interrogated was no pleasure…
Peter: And you know….
Joran: The only thing you think of is wanting to go home… So there are things you say that…. Yes… If you’re being promised you can go home… or it can help to get you home… than there are things you say that… (Unintelligible.)
Peter: (Unintelligible.)
Witt.: (Unintelligible.) Peter! Especially you know that people confess a murder that they didn’t commit. (In the past PRdV has gotten some people out of jail that indeed had confessed to committing a murder after being put under very strong pressure.)
Peter: And what does that has to do with this?
Witt.: Because in this way you can miss the truth.
Peter: But… How DID you get home?
Joran: I just told you that!?!
Peter: But those two brother denie that and from the email… from the sms- and chat-contacts that were there it shows up clearly that they didn’t bring you home.
Joran: That’s what you draw from that… But that’s not true at all… I think it indeed DOES show that.
Pauw: Back to your father if you don’t mind… You were judge-in-training I believe… And now you’re lawyer… And you have a son… and that son is interrogated, and this son tells a story of which you later find out…. Did you tell hiim yourself (to Joran)… Or how did you find out that it was a lie? You know… Dropped her off at the hotel and so on…
Joran: Yes… He heard that from the police.
Pauw: What did you think then?
Paulus: Well we were angry… So then we learned that Joran didn’t tell the truth…


More on the show from EURobert:

Paulus: Well we were angry… So when we learned that Joran didn’t tell the truth Anita and I just were very angry at Joran.
Pauw: A girl is missing and your son is a suspect and on top of that he has lied…
Paulus: Yes, yes, for us that was incomprehensible. That, that, … not just that he lied but he kept that lie up / kept on lying for a long time. That was… yes that was incomprehensible to us. We were very angry about that at that moment.
Pauw: Did you at that point say to him: ‘as long as there is no body there is no case’?
Paulus: No, I’ve never said that. That’s a term that you drop here now but…
Pauw: It’s put in the book like this as well…
Paulus: Yes.., but that term was used by the then Public Prosecutor, uh after I uh.. had had an interview with Twan Huys (dutch tv), of which the message was… well, we’re not the victims… let’s first concentrate on this girl… Let’s try to find that girl back. And she then, the next day, didn’t pick up that message and she said “Yes, this father, this (Unintelligible.) concerned father. But, he has instructed these guys: ‘No corps no case’, and that’s the reason why they are stating this way.” That was the only thing, and that off course is the heart of the matter, that I from the start on have said, this is a missing-case! This is not a criminal case. And that in my opinion is the big mistake that the OM has made: from the start they were talking about murder, manslaughter, kidnapping, rape… when there was no evidence for that. And later everything is getting in a certain light and now two and a half years later that has been corrected, but that has been very unfortunate.
Peter: I don’t think were are here now to assume this girl is still alive?!
Witt.: We’ll get to that later. Let’s get back a minute. You worked there as a back up judge. Imagine… This is a strictly hypothetical question… Imagine Joran telling you, a confidant par excelence in this family maybe, listen dad, I did something horrible… What would you have done in that case? I would have gone with Joran to the Public Prosecutor! Did you discuss this scenario with one another?
Paulus: What do you mean?
Anita: (Unintelligible. Something like: I, as a parent? Yes)
Witt.: You would agree with that?
Anita: Yes.
Witt.: You would have informed the police against your son?
Anita: Yes.
Joran: And I uh, can confirm that…. (LOL)
Witt.: You mean they would have threatened you with that?
Joran: No I think they would have done that yes.
Paulus: There would have been no doubts about that. I btw was amazed that a lot of people think that you could be able to hide something like this. For me that would have been absolutely strange. There would have been absolutely no doubts about that.
Pauw: Have you have doubts? Was there a moment you thought maybe he did it? That maybe an accident had happened and …
Paulus: No actually I have never doubted it one time.
Anita: I did.
Paulus: I have always seen the way Joran was with girls… He was not able to do that… I’m sure of that. He would, if anything would have happened to that girl, he would have acted accordingly.
Witt.: Yes, let’s talk a minute how Joran was with girls… He’s in his book very frank about it… For him it apparently was or is easy to seduce girls… So easy that you can question yourself if it always happened with the decency that has to go with that proces in comparison with someone who has much more difficulties getting in contact with girls and is much more courteously. For example you don’t write very respectfully about Natalee…
Joran: No… I am very respectfull towards girls. I have for example never pushed a girl (can’t hear it 100% right and don’t know what he means with that). Or did something wrong to a girl.
Witt.: Well there was talk of “the bitch this” and “the bitch that”. And you hardly knew this girl and still you were intimate with her. And after that leaving her there alone? These are not things that proof you have high respects for women.
Joran: No but it symply was so that I was in the casino and I was by her girlfriends invited to go out. And one thig led to the other and she wanted to come with us as well. She invited me to dance with her. Not that I didn’t want it but….
Witt.: No, it’s about this Joran. Your father says: ‘What we know of Joran is that he doesn’t do wrong things with girls. Opposite to that is the fact that you left her at the beach, you cheated on your own girlfriend not just with Natalee but with another girl as well… That is not evidence of a principle respect you have for these women?!
Joran: Well I can not, uh, I uh, well uh… Well maybe you’re right about that. Yes.
Witt.: But returning to the father, maybe you exaggerate the ‘respectfull’ way Joran behaves towards women?
Paulus: I have always seen that Joran respectfully treated girls. And we’ve discussed that as well. So for me it’s incomprehensible that a girl that wasn’t totally well was left behind by him.
Anita: He has had two times a longer relationship and that girl visited our house, we knew her parents, we knew that girl. And he is still in contact with that girl and we are - she still calls me ‘Mam’. He was with her for nine months, that girl was sixteen… That girl has very strongly defended Joran after that. After that there were some other dates. I think, and again I work with teens, 16, 17 and 18-year olds, that is very normal behaviour for a 17 year old boy. Well there were many telephone-calls normally, like: ‘Is Joran at home?’, ‘Can I speak to Joran?’ Well at a certain point Joran had his own telephone so we didn’t keep an eye on it anymore. But I have never seen, nor at our school because, he was at my school, I did see him a lot there off course, again I’ve never seen anything of bad behaviour…
Witt.: Have you ever thought that maybe an accident had happened because…
Anita: Yes that indeed I’ve thought for a moment… Because… Joran leaving a girl behind at the beach… That’s impossible because we allways say: Walk up with a girl when you lead her out by the door… So we didn’t bring him up like that and I then was furious at him, both of us were. So for a short while I thought that something could have happened…
Witt.: With alcohol and drugs maybe? …
Anita: Maybe. Well… With drugs… no… But alcohol… Those doubts were there for a while when I was in Holland but there I thought that the girl would soon show up again. But after three days it all became very worrying.
Witt.: Okay, we now go as agreed with Peter R. de Vries about his approach and your reaction to that but first we’ll watch todays news. (Newsclip)
Pauw: Okay, Peter R. de Vries as we announced earlier



BUMP


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: San on January 12, 2008, 06:24:31 PM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/Fromtheshow.jpg)

BUMP


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: San on January 12, 2008, 06:26:45 PM
Every time I look at the picture of Anita I want to smack the hell out of her.  That fat lying POS.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 12, 2008, 06:27:29 PM
Quote
Paulus: Well look uhhhh… Mister De Vries can’t hear that good… If he would have listened carefully he would have heard that Joran said that he didn’t have any confidence in the OM (public pros.)! That’s what Joran has said. Joran didn’t talk about the judicial authorities. What you see now.., what has happened is that luckely we have judicial authorities… And we sit here again! So in the end it’s because of the judicial authorities that all has ended well.

OK...you just said it all paulus...you have faith in the judges because they made sure to it your son's crime was covered up!!! you a-hole!!! so sorry!!! crap..we have been saying this for 2 1/2 years!!! Pualus had the judges cover for him!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tibrogargan on January 12, 2008, 06:27:42 PM
Private Eye - it's my understanding that Peter de Vries is a crime journalist.  He claims to have solved cases that others couldn't solve.  He's one of those people you either love him or hate him.  I've seen many Dutch posters that love him.

The program last night was not his show, he was a guest on the show. 

Edited to add:  Here is a link to the Peter de Vries show website

http://www.peterrdevries.nl/




Thanks Klass I love the interviewer, show, host, or guest whomever it was::))) I would have a little understanding for Joran and discount it except he HAD TO BE PREPARED, HAD TO EXPECT IT, AND IS STUPID ENOUGH TO KEEP TALKING AND ACTING SO ARROGANT!!!!!!!!!!AND HAD BOTH PARENTS AT HIS SIDE. NOTICE THAT ANITA DIDN'T EVEN BLINK



Good morning, monkeys.

I am still back on Page 21 reading so have not read all your comments yet about the show.
My initial thoughts are that Joran behaved just as expected - no manners, no self control and a very short temper.  He showed himself to be the undisciplined and selfish jerk we have all thought of him as being.

Anita as usual was in cover-up mode and trying to make a very bad situation appear normal, whilst knowing a lot more than she will admit.  She should be better at it after all these years of cleaning up after her husband and son than she appeared to be on this video.

But my greatest impression was of Paulus - a lawyer and a would-be judge who should be used to being in front of an audience or court and speaking fluently (remember this interview is in their native tongue) without all the ums and ahs, which were so numerous that our translator had to omit them from the transcript.  This indicates to me his guilt even more than the sweating episode did at the Sloot's own house when meeting Beth and Greta.  I keep trying to push aside that theory that Paulus was more closely involved with Natalee but this interview did nothing to dispel my fears in this regard.

I am sure other monkeys have observed and already commented on the above but the whole episode was so sickening to watch that I felt I had to comment if only for my own sanity.

God bless Beth and all of Natalee's family.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Anna on January 12, 2008, 06:36:41 PM
Haven't see the comments of Peter DeVries after the booze-throwing episode posted.  If it has been, please delete:

Translated by Lazlo:


Transcript of the NOS radio interview with de Vries and Witteman:

De Vries: I did not see it (coming) myself, but the moment when I was not watching Joran threw a glass of red wine into my face, and it was alcohol so it itched for a while, it was a strange ending of the program.

Interviewer: The ending was sort of tense wasn't it?

De Vries: Well I think the end was not that...

Interviewer (interrupts) : Well he did not believe that you would ever apologize if it turned out to be something else.

De Vries: Well that is his good right to not believe that. But other then that, the broadcasting was spicy but did not get out of hand or anything. So I was very surprised that after the show he then suddenly throws a glass of wine into your face.

Interviewer: What do you think about this?

De Vries: Well this tells something about Joran of course.

Interviewer: What? (does it say about Joran?)

De Vries: That he cannot control his behavior.
His parents did their best to insist during the broadcasting that their son was well mannered, that he always was correct with girls, that there were so many things he would just never do.
Then I think to myself, well this probably was something the parents would have agreed upon in advance also our child would never do something like that.

Interviewer: He was standing here, he does not want to talk to us, he said this was the last interview we ever gave.
Ehm, his mother was very angry with him.

De Vries: Yes his mother of course was embarrassed hugely, she had tried so hard to protect her son, and to present him as a well mannered young man.
On the moment that after such a conversation he does something like this then everything the parents tried to do he destroys that with such an act of course.

Interviewer: What a strange ending of the broadcasting!

Paul Witteman:Yes, horrible. And ridiculous!
This did not make any sense at all.

Interviewer: How do you feel about the program?

Witteman: I found it exiting and balanced.

Interviewer: Ppl who were watching claim you have allowed Joran to talk very lengthy.

Witteman: Yes, he was of course the main guest. And Peter de Vries can take very good care of himself that was obvious in this broadcasting, verbally that is.
And we now had the occasion to get the discussion going between these two, and that had not happened prior. So we let that happen.
But a fact is that Joran van der Sloot was released, was interrogated in many ways, that the justice in Aruba does not see grounds for prosecution, and that juridically then there is something like, then it has to be over with, that is why we made the show now, as in; what now, ho to go from here.

Interviewer: I had the feeling you were defending Joran at times during the show towards Peter de Vries.

Witteman: I honestly feel that Peter de Vries, who of course has investigated, in Aruba, but he did not found much damaging material that would make Joran closer to the qualification of a murderer, and that is why I feel why Joran during such a program, when he is being called a liar over and over again, I do not feel it being not correct to defend your guest a little bit. That would go the other way around also by the way.

Interviewer: And what Joran van der Sloot then does at the end, how would you want to qualify that?

Witteman: Incredible and hugely stupid.
I mean it was of course the intention of the family van der Sloot to come her and show they want to continue their lives, and that they want to leave this case behind them, but that will be difficult as long as the body of Natalee has not been found, and when you want to get at least some understanding of the public, you of course should not perfrom things like this (referring to throwing wine).

Interviewer: How would you describe this broadcasting?

Witteman: The broadcasting itself, I found it to be very good and exciting.

Interviewer: The ending though was sort of strange.

Witteman: Dramatically, and nasty and incredible.


http://player.nos.nl/index.php/media/play/tcmid/tcm:5-343390/
 
 

http://blogsfornatalee.com/forum/index.php?topic=8130.135

Translation by Lazlo posted at BFN by Debbie.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: wreck on January 12, 2008, 06:45:13 PM
Someone stated that the wine throwing occurred during the running of the credits. I have not watched the show yet -- is it there????


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 12, 2008, 06:47:17 PM
Haven't see the comments of Peter DeVries after the booze-throwing episode posted.  If it has been, please delete:

Translated by Lazlo:


Transcript of the NOS radio interview with de Vries and Witteman:

De Vries: I did not see it (coming) myself, but the moment when I was not watching Joran threw a glass of red wine into my face, and it was alcohol so it itched for a while, it was a strange ending of the program.

Interviewer: The ending was sort of tense wasn't it?

De Vries: Well I think the end was not that...

Interviewer (interrupts) : Well he did not believe that you would ever apologize if it turned out to be something else.

De Vries: Well that is his good right to not believe that. But other then that, the broadcasting was spicy but did not get out of hand or anything. So I was very surprised that after the show he then suddenly throws a glass of wine into your face.

Interviewer: What do you think about this?

De Vries: Well this tells something about Joran of course.

Interviewer: What? (does it say about Joran?)

De Vries: That he cannot control his behavior.
His parents did their best to insist during the broadcasting that their son was well mannered, that he always was correct with girls, that there were so many things he would just never do.
Then I think to myself, well this probably was something the parents would have agreed upon in advance also our child would never do something like that.

Interviewer: He was standing here, he does not want to talk to us, he said this was the last interview we ever gave.
Ehm, his mother was very angry with him.

De Vries: Yes his mother of course was embarrassed hugely, she had tried so hard to protect her son, and to present him as a well mannered young man.
On the moment that after such a conversation he does something like this then everything the parents tried to do he destroys that with such an act of course.

Interviewer: What a strange ending of the broadcasting!

Paul Witteman:Yes, horrible. And ridiculous!
This did not make any sense at all.

Interviewer: How do you feel about the program?

Witteman: I found it exiting and balanced.

Interviewer: Ppl who were watching claim you have allowed Joran to talk very lengthy.

Witteman: Yes, he was of course the main guest. And Peter de Vries can take very good care of himself that was obvious in this broadcasting, verbally that is.
And we now had the occasion to get the discussion going between these two, and that had not happened prior. So we let that happen.
But a fact is that Joran van der Sloot was released, was interrogated in many ways, that the justice in Aruba does not see grounds for prosecution, and that juridically then there is something like, then it has to be over with, that is why we made the show now, as in; what now, ho to go from here.

Interviewer: I had the feeling you were defending Joran at times during the show towards Peter de Vries.

Witteman: I honestly feel that Peter de Vries, who of course has investigated, in Aruba, but he did not found much damaging material that would make Joran closer to the qualification of a murderer, and that is why I feel why Joran during such a program, when he is being called a liar over and over again, I do not feel it being not correct to defend your guest a little bit. That would go the other way around also by the way.

Interviewer: And what Joran van der Sloot then does at the end, how would you want to qualify that?

Witteman: Incredible and hugely stupid.
I mean it was of course the intention of the family van der Sloot to come her and show they want to continue their lives, and that they want to leave this case behind them, but that will be difficult as long as the body of Natalee has not been found, and when you want to get at least some understanding of the public, you of course should not perfrom things like this (referring to throwing wine).

Interviewer: How would you describe this broadcasting?

Witteman: The broadcasting itself, I found it to be very good and exciting.

Interviewer: The ending though was sort of strange.

Witteman: Dramatically, and nasty and incredible.


http://player.nos.nl/index.php/media/play/tcmid/tcm:5-343390/
 
 

http://blogsfornatalee.com/forum/index.php?topic=8130.135

Translation by Lazlo posted at BFN by Debbie.

Hello Anna!! Thanks I had not seen this one before.
I think the sloots have a prerequisite for their interviews, say you are "inclined to believe joran" or we walk!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 12, 2008, 06:48:49 PM
Someone stated that the wine throwing occurred during the running of the credits. I have not watched the show yet -- is it there????

I don't think it has been posted yet wreck but rumors it WAS caught on tape.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 12, 2008, 06:52:49 PM
From Jos at BFN...thanks

Interview with Paul Witteman (talk show host) and Peter de Vries after the incident. You can find it here

http://player.nos.nl/index.php/media/play/tcmid/tcm:5-343390/

Content in a few words:

Peter did not see it coming, he did not see Joran throwing the glass, but afterwords he could not see and it hurted. This behavior is in contradiction with what the parents told during the show, namely that Joran is a decent boy with good manners and he has overcome his problems and has his emotons under control now. This behavior shows the opposite.

Paul says that Anita was very angry at Joran, because he just did the opposite from what she had been saying all night long (Joran ran out of the studio, Paul followed and Anita stayed behind to talk to the hosts and Peter). Goal of the program was to let Joran talk and to bring about a discussion between him and Peter. Now Joran has been acquitted, there is not reason left for not doing it.

Question to Paul: it seemed you defended Joran so much. Paul says that is not being prosecuted now and Peter said too much on the show that he is a liar. Peter also couldn't come up with substantial material that would be able to prosecute Joran.

Paul called the program spicy though decent but was shocked by the end of it. His words were "dramatic/unbelievable/horrible" and "very stupid", for this is a proof Joran does not have his emotions under control and the speculation will go on.


The glass throwing incident implies that it is just a matter of time before Joran's complete lack of self-control will claim another victim.  If crossed ... this young man is a time-bomb ... a time bomb that will expode without warning.  Why is this mother in denial ... does she not care about her son or ... those to who he poses a risk?

Janet 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Dihannah1 on January 12, 2008, 07:06:48 PM
Catching up myself.  I see The drama never ends with those idiots.  Well at least they made themselves look bad, can't blame anybody else for that one!  When will they ever realize there drama ISN'T going to end until the case is solved!   Keep talking bozosloot's


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 12, 2008, 07:07:10 PM
If he thought his son was not lying for such a long time, why was he telling all 3 boys during the first 10 days, no body no case? In fact, how did he know there was no body?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 12, 2008, 07:09:03 PM
Why was he dismissed from the judge in training program?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 12, 2008, 07:11:54 PM
No video yet but some photos are showing up  :wink:

http://www.telegraaf.nl/binnenland/3008566/_Joran_gooit_wijn_naar_Peter_R.__.html?p=16,1

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/JoranPetertv.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: sirensong on January 12, 2008, 07:12:27 PM
I am so glad Anita was there, alot of things she says are telling.  Like she didn't believe him at first, she had a confrontation with Joran when he was in jail, he did see the psychiatrist for lying (but not just for lying), she raised Joran alone and had problems with him, just to point out a  few.  To me, it looks as if Joran is used to manipulating his parents.  He knows what  they want him to say, and he does as  he pleases.  Then like the "good boy", he laughs and says he knows his parents would have taken him to jail.  Duh, that's why he lied!!  He has no respect for them at all.   At one point in the interview, when DeVries is pointing out that it made no sense for him to lie right off the bat, Joran claims that the interrogation was so rough etc., but he has forgotten, he made up the lies before he was ever interrogated.  Know wonder he was furious with DeVries, he knows he just screwed up.  He hates DeVries because he  can see through Joran.   And Joran gets nervous having to answer his questions.  I hope DeVries vows to avenge  himself and prove Joran guilty!!  Anyway, I just think if you read this interview carefully, there are so many things that show what a sociopath he really is, and his parents are in big denial.  They know its been this way for a long time.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Shell on January 12, 2008, 07:12:31 PM
Mum

Witt, in this instance is a panel member.  That was not a quote from the judge.  It was a comment from the interviewer after Paulus commented about the judiciary.

"So in the end it’s because of the judicial authorities that all has ended well." said Paulus. Well yes Paulus, that has crossed my mind many times. Your cronies.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 12, 2008, 07:12:58 PM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/JoranPeter1.jpg)

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/JoranPeter2.jpg)

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/JoranPeter3.jpg)

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/JoranPeter4.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Anna on January 12, 2008, 07:13:05 PM
Did I hear correctly today on Fox, that Anita wants the investigation investigated?  Hmmm, oh, please.  Anita, you can join OJ, another perpetrator who wants the investigation investigated since he is the victim, like your son, Anita.  All stalkers and especially stalkers who murder, are said to claim they are the victims rather than the perpetrators.  Makes me go hmmm.


I agree, Tylergal.  Don't think I have ever seen one yet to fail to take this approach.  Ludicrous to suggest that Natalee and her family need to be investigated for they have nothing whatsoever to do with what Joran did.  I don't know how those parents can even suggest that Joran is a victim of anything except his own actions.

Just too typical.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: robots on January 12, 2008, 07:13:58 PM
Hello Anna Banana    




 :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool:


 :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: robots on January 12, 2008, 07:15:18 PM
No video yet but some photos are showing up  :wink:

http://www.telegraaf.nl/binnenland/3008566/_Joran_gooit_wijn_naar_Peter_R.__.html?p=16,1

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/JoranPetertv.gif)

if there was a gun there, joran would have killed everyone  :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 12, 2008, 07:17:44 PM
Posted by EURobert on the front page of SM - transcription of the show last night:

Transscript and translation of last nights Pauw en Witteman tv-show (Please excuse me for all the grammatical and typing errors that will be in here; it’s to time-consuming to do it flawless…. Mr. Witteman’s first name is Paul so I’ll call PaulvdS: ‘Paulus’; that’s easier for me… To not get confused…)

Witteman: Good evening. Yes, Joran van der Sloot was brought back to Aruba end of november to be interrogated. That interrogation produced nothing. He was let go and the case was dismissed.
Pauw: Joran is here, together with his father Paul and with his mother Anita to have as they themselves say, their last tv-interview about this case.
Witt.: Here as well is Peter R. de Vries who has made a television-documentairy about the NH-case and the role JvdS played, and who has his doubts. He has called Joran a lier, so their is something to be discussed.
Pauw: (Looking at Joran) Yes, well.., you can confess now, so we have that behind us…? … … … … Are that the jokes you hear the most? Or what are you bothered with more Joran?
Joran: Well, I’m not really bothered by others.. But you have to keep making jokes. As you just said yourself… else you don’t get through all this.
Pauw: Do you have the feeling now that the whole matter is over now… or do you still have the feeling that if you somewhere hear a sirene… that could be for me?
Joran: Well… Not really like that but uh it’s something that you’ll never forget. It’s something… It sticks with you all the time. You best just keep going on but… It’s something you won’t easily forget. But I think in the judicial sense it now is over yes.
Pauw: Are you addressed on this often?
Paulus: Uhhmmm… No, actually not so… I’m not addressed on this often. Uhh… All-days live goes it’s normal way… And the people at Aruba have had it with this.
Witt.: Yes, they’ve had it with this… But do they believe you?
Paulus: Uuhhm… I think so.
Witt.: So if you walk the streets you don’t think: ‘Oh they look at me… Maybe indeed a murderer… Or some other creepy-person…?’
Paulus: No, I don’t have that feeling at all. No it’s on the contrary very remarkable… uhhh… such a small community as Aruba is… and as it has had very much negative effects because of all this… That they keep and kept being supportive towards us. That has uh amazed us and… it has… our hearts… strengthened… as well. (Unintelligible.)
Witt.: Were you bothered by it?
Anita: Uhhm… Well I wasn’t bothered by it so much… You know that there is talk… I mean in every community… there is talk about what has happened. Actually… uhm, uhm, it was more like… the people they were very supportive. Neighbours, people you didn’t know at all, that still came to you… We lived on Aruba for almost twenty years… And people know Joran from the time he was very small… They saw Paul or me pushing the pram… And a former teacher of him that came by who said: ‘Well this can not at all be possible… Such a sweet kid…’ So that you felt as if this story must have had a different cause… Something else is going on… And… uh, the support… Well it sounds very strange but… it was very big. Really very big.
Witt.: Well, now the case is dismissed, in the judicial sense over with.., is that the reason you agreed to sit at the table with Peter R. de Vries?
Paulus: Well yes we have allways uh, said that uh, as soon as uh, this case us no longer in court.., when uh, the OM uh, is no longer prosecuting it, we uh, are willing to give uh, another interview, in uh, a reliable tv-show. Uh… To show we have nothing to hide. (I have to skip all the ‘uhs’ here now… the’re just to much of them.) And it is so that all this publicity has had a very big impact on this case. It has even at some point taken over it. We thought that as long as this case is going on it was not right to get in the lamplights - however at some times it was necessary - because we didn’t want to frustrate this investigation in any way.
Witt.: Yes, well uhm, Peter R. de Vries is here… He’s tried before… on Aruba as well, to get in contact with you… We’ll show a little clip how that sometimes went. (Clip of PRdVries at Jorans student-house in Arnhem, confronting Joran with fabricated photo of him with Natalee.)
Pauw: Well there were, before we started this show, some jokes made at this table like: ‘Well Peter… where’s your hidden camera…’ Well that hidden camera is not here right now. Peter, you have tried to get in contact with the VanderSloot-family a couple of times to have interviews… So you didn’t just walk behind them with your hidden camera… Do you understand something of the answer of Paul van der Sloot?
PRdV: No, to be honest, I don’t understand very much of that. I think it’s strange to hear him say here, he has nothing to hide, and he didn’t want to frustrate the investigation… But than I have to notice that they did nothing to help the case. Because Joran vdS has when he was at Aruba the last weeks, and could explain all his actions / conducts, maybe could end the mysteries, maybe could shed some light on that.., he has for weeks ‘kept his molars close on top of each-other’ (dutch expression = didn’t speak). Has not spoken a word, not answered one question! That is not what PvdS says…… this nice saying ‘We have nothing to hide’. Then I think… If you are innocent… and you did nothing wrong… why don’t you just tell your story, why don’t you answer questions from the police? The fact that you just kept your jaws closed (dutch expr.) I think in these circumstances is very strange…..
Pauw: Let’s agree that somewhat later in this show on this question, this is one of your questions but you have more of them, get answers from Joran or his father or mother… But first we…
Peter: Yes…. Just give hime some time to think…..
Pauw: Yes… So you have time to find the ‘right’ answer… (LOL) But firs before we talk about this whole matter let’s give the people at home a small summary of what has all happened and what is known… (CLIP of the NH-case)
Witt.: Were you suprised that you were re-arrested?
Joran: yes, off course… I uh… hadn’t expected that at all… I thought they were joking me… when the police arrived at the door… telling me ‘you’re under arrest again’… Because yes, uh I knew they could have nothing on me… so why would they again….
Witt.: Well it was said that there were new facts, so there were new grounds to arrest you again and take you to Aruba to interrogate you.
Joran: Yes, but I knew that would be impossible… that… that…
Witt.: But what than did you think… if it was impossible, what would be the reason they arrested you again?
Joran: Well I don’t know… Maybe I thought somebody has falsely stated against me, or something bad was said about me. I don’t know… Something like that… That’s what I thought… In that direction… Maybe something like that.
Witt.: And what did it turn out to be?! Because… You got there… You were interrogated…
Joran.: Well there turned out to be abslolutely nothing. No new evidence at all… Just old statements that they looked at in a different way.
Witt.: How did the interrogation go?
Joran: Well, just as mr. De Vries said, I just kept silent. I didn’t say anything.
Witt.: Why not?
Joran: I don’t have any trust anymore in the OM at Aruba… I think that they…. they are not trying to find the truth… or trying to find out what happened in this case. They are just literally doing…. they just want somebody to hang for this…

——-
More to come….

Joran: … they just want somebody to hang for this… They just want for their own egos to… That they themselves come good out of this…
Witt.: Even if it is an innocent person as well…
Joran: Yes, even if it is an innocent person as well. I’m convinced of that.
Peter: Well I think it’s a bit awkward that you say the Aruban OM is not trustworthy where it was you who lied all the time?!
Joran: Yes I lied and I admitt that but there were reasons for that and you don’t know them and….
Peter: Yes! I would like to know those reasons! … To lie about what you have done where you supposedly have nothing to hide!? Why do you have to lie then, tell me that?!
Joran: Well I did that extensivly in my book allready. And you have read that so you allready know the reasons.
Peter: But you are here now to tell your story or…?!!!
Witt.: Let’s agree that we the second part of the show will give you the opportunity to do that but first let’s tell the story of the VdSloot-family according to the rules we’ve in advance agreed on with Joran namely that we first look at what actually happened. Because you say I kept my mouth shut. I didn’t tell them anything more and they didn’t come up with anything new. Were those interrogations despite that tough?
Joran: Uhmmmmm… Well in fact compared to the first ones they were not. They turned out less tough than I’d expected. There was a Dutch detective-team that told THEIR story and in fact it was just speculating what they did. The allready talked in terms of ‘a girl that was dead’, you name it, where in fact it’s just a missing girl.
Pauw: That is all in the file is it… Because in the file of the judge-commissionar it says that it has to be put first that there are strong indications that Natalee is dead.
Joran: I would like to now that know as well…
Pauw: Because there is now evidence you know of she’s dead?
Joran: (Shakes his head.)
Pauw: Well, Deepak Kalpoe had stated that ‘her death was not good’?
Witt.: One of your friends there…
Joran: Yes, that uhhh… I don’t know either how that has went/gone (?) exactly… That’s something you should ask them.
Pauw: Didn’t you ask that to them ever? Like: ‘What have you said now?’
Joran: No (Unintelligible.)
Pauw: But what did you say than?
Joran: No I never asked him that. I uh, I mean we were so often interrogated by the police and we’ve in the beginning made so many statements… And I have allready said all there is to tell. So I think also… Yes… Why do I have to make the same statements twenty times to the police? I think that… the only thing they try is to find a little difference in them…
Pauw.: What we do here Joran, is just citing the report of the Judge-commissionar who has used that at Aruba. In this way Deepak Kalpoe stated that her death was not good, has Satish Kalpoe - which is the other friend or brother, what is it exactly? …
Joran: His brother.
Pauw: … Kalpoe thinks that suspect - you - has hit her to death, you yourself supposedly have stated about the burying of Natalee Holloway? That are some hard fact because of which you suggest that indeed something IS going on?
Joran: Yes, … I, I, … It’s three years ago now and in the beginning we’ve been really treated tough by the police and made to say things that we… wouldn’t say ourselves. And yes I have the feeling they made me want to say things that weren’t true.
Pauw: Did you never say… Or have you never spoken about burying Natalee Holloway?
Joran: No I have never discussed that with the pollice.
Anita: Can I go into that for a moment?
Witt.: Off course.
Anita: Uhmmm… When Joran was arrested for the first time I was the only one who was allowed to see him. Because he was a minor and they wanted to keep out Paul because of his function. Uhm, I have spoken to Joran some times but only short, some 15 to twenty minutes. And I am his mother. I love him very dearly. And I’m really convinced he wouldn’t do anything to that girl. These first emotions, these are very important to me… to see them in him as well… For a moment I doubted him. I’ve thought… By Jingo, could an accident have happened? Has something happened? Doesn’t he want to tell… He is just having his final exams… He knows he has final-exams-celebrations… He has a girlfriend… so he’s cheated on her… His father will be very angry with him… Etc. etc…. So I very directly spoke with him and one of the confrontations… that I came over there… And I was taken by an Aruban detective… And Joran was very upset… He before that was beset for hours and hours… Words were put in his mouth… which he never said… that were put to paper but that he never signed. And they showed that to me…: ‘This is what he said!’
Pauw: Well these are maybe not the most subtle moments in this conversation but Joran, you visited a psychiatrist because you were lying all the time.
Joran: No… That was not the reason why I visited the psychiatrist. I’ve been two times to a childrens psychiatrist but that was because we had some things going on within our family.
Anita: I can explain that as well… So you can hear it from my own mouth… Paul was in Holland for the Judges-training and I had to deal with three children in my own… And Joran as many seventeen year olds… I myself work with teens… And uh… he was not the easiest one. Besides that we had problems with… I had some problems with him… That he came home way to late… Uhm… I’m rather strict… Maybe even sometimes I was a little to strict… And at a certain point after talking about it with a friend of mine, maybe it’s good when we have some consults with a youth-psychiatrist. Because I just want that he has a goal in life… that he thinks well what he wants with his life and all this ‘going out’ I just think bad about that. And at that time he started playing poker in the casino and I don’t want my son being in the casino! So I contacted I youth-psychiatrist… He wasn’t 18 yet, he still was seventeen… He went there twice, that’s correct and we had one conlusive-conversation after that. And that was it… So it was really not just about lying…
Peter: What I now think is striking is that they have no confidence what soever in the judicial authorities. where at the same time it hasn’t been a long time ago that Paul vd Sloot did his very best to work in that organisation.
Pauw: As a judge you mean…
Peter: As a judge. I think it’s striking that suddenly there is so little confidence in that organisation…
Paulus: Well look uhhhh… Mister De Vries can’t hear that good… If he would have listened carefully he would have heard that Joran said that he didn’t have any confidence in the OM (public pros.)! That’s what Joran has said. Joran didn’t talk about the judicial authorities. What you see now.., what has happened is that luckely we have judicial authorities… And we sit here again! So in the end it’s because of the judicial authorities that all has ended well.
Witt.: The judge has said: the case must be dismissed, there is to little evidence, Joran is free! Well let’s for a minute get back to that prosecution before Joran was released because Joran just said they wanted to frame me; that’s what it came to it.


More to come…

 NOTE - i'LL ADD TO THIS POST WHEN MORE IS TRANSLATED AND POSTED ON THE FRONT PAGE OF SM

More of the show translated by EURobert:

Next bit…

Witt.: Well let’s for a minute get back to that prosecution before Joran was released because Joran just said they wanted to frame me; that’s what it turned out to be.
Joran: Well it was more like… In the beginning… the first time I was arrested they were rather tough with us: they sticked pictures of the girl to the wall… And uh, they told me as well… these two brothers… They played us off against eachother. Suggested that we had said things about eachother that were… That weren’t true all the time…
Witt.: But you all had learned the same story?
Joran: Yes.., we had agreed on… we had agreed on that… in advance…
Pauw: That you had taken her to a hotel… And that she was so unstable she had to hold on to a pillar… And I think that all three of you up to the pillar, told the same story?!
Joran: Yes but everyone had added their own things to it…
Pauw: But why did you do that? Why did you agree on making up this particular story?
Joran: Yes.., yes… Why this story? I just was scared at that moment… Those parents suddenly were at our house… And yes… I didn’t have a clue either what to do next.
Pauw: And so you decide the three of you to make up one story and this is how we’re going to tell it.
Peter: You just can tell the truth can you, when nothing happened? There’s no reason to lie is there?
Joran: Yes, I don’t think the truth sounds that good if you have to say you left a girl at the beach.
Peter: So you think a lie sounds better than the truth?
Joran: Well I didn’t know how serious this all was. I didn’t know there was a serious problem.
Peter: That’s exacly why it is so strange to lie!? When you don’t know that there is a serious problem there is no reason to lie at all!? That’s exactly the strange thing of lying here!?
Pauw: Peter… Peter you a father of a teenager, well maybe that’s a bit insipid, father of a young daughter… You can imagine you do something… leaving a girl at the beach… Let’s just tell I decently brought her back…. Such a little lie you can imagine can you?
Peter: No, I can’t imagine that Jeroen… I think you must try to see the psychology behind that. When he doesn’t know what has happened to that girl and she, after she slept away her drunkenness, simply shows up again then he is really caught lying! The fact that he nevertheless tells this lie you can interpret as: he knew he wouldn’t get caught telling this lie. Because he knew Natalee wouldn’t show up again!
Witt.: Don’t you think you look at this in a to much argumentual way? We talk about a seventeen year old boy who is confronted with the parents of girl that possibly has disappeared, maybe think that she is murdered and look at him, then you get in a panic don’t you think? In that case you may not immediatly tell them ‘Yes, I left her at the beach’.
Peter: Well I think it’s always the best option to simply tell the truth especially when you’re…
Witt.: But as a reality-reporter you must know there are exeptions to this rule…?
Peter: Yes, and most of the time they have good reasons.. But in a situation that nothing has happened.., there were no wrongdoings.., the girl herself wanted to stay there.., or get home by herself… than that’s what you say don’t you? The fact that you don’t do that AND THE THREE OF YOU IN A VERY SMART WAY MAKE UP A STORY… I think that’s suspicious.
Joran: I think it’s bad that I lied myself as well and that’s what I regret the most. If I had came forward with the truth at the beginning I think everything would have gone very different. And I think that as well is one off the reasons mister De Vries thinks the way he thinks but when you just look at the facts in this case… The timeperiod I was with this girl, being home after that, going to school the next day, and other things… What then do you try to say I have done?
Peter: If you want to discuss the facts, than tell me how you got home that night?
Joran: I was taken home by Satish…
Peter: Yes… And he denies that! He says I didn’t take him to his home at all! And first you stated that you were brought home by Deepak!!?? Not by Satish!!! Those are things as well that put you in a…..
Joran: Mister De Vries… I don’t know if you ever…
Peter: Why should they lie?
Witt.: Give him a change to answer this….
Joran: …if you ever were interrogated by the police…. in a murder case…
Peter: (Unintelligible. Something like ‘Yes I was’…)
Joran: In a murder-case?!
Peter: No… Not where I was a suspect…
Joran: The way I was interrogated was no pleasure…
Peter: And you know….
Joran: The only thing you think of is wanting to go home… So there are things you say that…. Yes… If you’re being promised you can go home… or it can help to get you home… than there are things you say that… (Unintelligible.)
Peter: (Unintelligible.)
Witt.: (Unintelligible.) Peter! Especially you know that people confess a murder that they didn’t commit. (In the past PRdV has gotten some people out of jail that indeed had confessed to committing a murder after being put under very strong pressure.)
Peter: And what does that has to do with this?
Witt.: Because in this way you can miss the truth.
Peter: But… How DID you get home?
Joran: I just told you that!?!
Peter: But those two brother denie that and from the email… from the sms- and chat-contacts that were there it shows up clearly that they didn’t bring you home.
Joran: That’s what you draw from that… But that’s not true at all… I think it indeed DOES show that.
Pauw: Back to your father if you don’t mind… You were judge-in-training I believe… And now you’re lawyer… And you have a son… and that son is interrogated, and this son tells a story of which you later find out…. Did you tell hiim yourself (to Joran)… Or how did you find out that it was a lie? You know… Dropped her off at the hotel and so on…
Joran: Yes… He heard that from the police.
Pauw: What did you think then?
Paulus: Well we were angry… So then we learned that Joran didn’t tell the truth…


More on the show from EURobert:

Paulus: Well we were angry… So when we learned that Joran didn’t tell the truth Anita and I just were very angry at Joran.
Pauw: A girl is missing and your son is a suspect and on top of that he has lied…
Paulus: Yes, yes, for us that was incomprehensible. That, that, … not just that he lied but he kept that lie up / kept on lying for a long time. That was… yes that was incomprehensible to us. We were very angry about that at that moment.
Pauw: Did you at that point say to him: ‘as long as there is no body there is no case’?
Paulus: No, I’ve never said that. That’s a term that you drop here now but…
Pauw: It’s put in the book like this as well…
Paulus: Yes.., but that term was used by the then Public Prosecutor, uh after I uh.. had had an interview with Twan Huys (dutch tv), of which the message was… well, we’re not the victims… let’s first concentrate on this girl… Let’s try to find that girl back. And she then, the next day, didn’t pick up that message and she said “Yes, this father, this (Unintelligible.) concerned father. But, he has instructed these guys: ‘No corps no case’, and that’s the reason why they are stating this way.” That was the only thing, and that off course is the heart of the matter, that I from the start on have said, this is a missing-case! This is not a criminal case. And that in my opinion is the big mistake that the OM has made: from the start they were talking about murder, manslaughter, kidnapping, rape… when there was no evidence for that. And later everything is getting in a certain light and now two and a half years later that has been corrected, but that has been very unfortunate.
Peter: I don’t think were are here now to assume this girl is still alive?!
Witt.: We’ll get to that later. Let’s get back a minute. You worked there as a back up judge. Imagine… This is a strictly hypothetical question… Imagine Joran telling you, a confidant par excelence in this family maybe, listen dad, I did something horrible… What would you have done in that case? I would have gone with Joran to the Public Prosecutor! Did you discuss this scenario with one another?
Paulus: What do you mean?
Anita: (Unintelligible. Something like: I, as a parent? Yes)
Witt.: You would agree with that?
Anita: Yes.
Witt.: You would have informed the police against your son?
Anita: Yes.
Joran: And I uh, can confirm that…. (LOL)
Witt.: You mean they would have threatened you with that?
Joran: No I think they would have done that yes.
Paulus: There would have been no doubts about that. I btw was amazed that a lot of people think that you could be able to hide something like this. For me that would have been absolutely strange. There would have been absolutely no doubts about that.
Pauw: Have you have doubts? Was there a moment you thought maybe he did it? That maybe an accident had happened and …
Paulus: No actually I have never doubted it one time.
Anita: I did.
Paulus: I have always seen the way Joran was with girls… He was not able to do that… I’m sure of that. He would, if anything would have happened to that girl, he would have acted accordingly.
Witt.: Yes, let’s talk a minute how Joran was with girls… He’s in his book very frank about it… For him it apparently was or is easy to seduce girls… So easy that you can question yourself if it always happened with the decency that has to go with that proces in comparison with someone who has much more difficulties getting in contact with girls and is much more courteously. For example you don’t write very respectfully about Natalee…
Joran: No… I am very respectfull towards girls. I have for example never pushed a girl (can’t hear it 100% right and don’t know what he means with that). Or did something wrong to a girl.
Witt.: Well there was talk of “the bitch this” and “the bitch that”. And you hardly knew this girl and still you were intimate with her. And after that leaving her there alone? These are not things that proof you have high respects for women.
Joran: No but it symply was so that I was in the casino and I was by her girlfriends invited to go out. And one thig led to the other and she wanted to come with us as well. She invited me to dance with her. Not that I didn’t want it but….
Witt.: No, it’s about this Joran. Your father says: ‘What we know of Joran is that he doesn’t do wrong things with girls. Opposite to that is the fact that you left her at the beach, you cheated on your own girlfriend not just with Natalee but with another girl as well… That is not evidence of a principle respect you have for these women?!
Joran: Well I can not, uh, I uh, well uh… Well maybe you’re right about that. Yes.
Witt.: But returning to the father, maybe you exaggerate the ‘respectfull’ way Joran behaves towards women?
Paulus: I have always seen that Joran respectfully treated girls. And we’ve discussed that as well. So for me it’s incomprehensible that a girl that wasn’t totally well was left behind by him.
Anita: He has had two times a longer relationship and that girl visited our house, we knew her parents, we knew that girl. And he is still in contact with that girl and we are - she still calls me ‘Mam’. He was with her for nine months, that girl was sixteen… That girl has very strongly defended Joran after that. After that there were some other dates. I think, and again I work with teens, 16, 17 and 18-year olds, that is very normal behaviour for a 17 year old boy. Well there were many telephone-calls normally, like: ‘Is Joran at home?’, ‘Can I speak to Joran?’ Well at a certain point Joran had his own telephone so we didn’t keep an eye on it anymore. But I have never seen, nor at our school because, he was at my school, I did see him a lot there off course, again I’ve never seen anything of bad behaviour…
Witt.: Have you ever thought that maybe an accident had happened because…
Anita: Yes that indeed I’ve thought for a moment… Because… Joran leaving a girl behind at the beach… That’s impossible because we allways say: Walk up with a girl when you lead her out by the door… So we didn’t bring him up like that and I then was furious at him, both of us were. So for a short while I thought that something could have happened…
Witt.: With alcohol and drugs maybe? …
Anita: Maybe. Well… With drugs… no… But alcohol… Those doubts were there for a while when I was in Holland but there I thought that the girl would soon show up again. But after three days it all became very worrying.
Witt.: Okay, we now go as agreed with Peter R. de Vries about his approach and your reaction to that but first we’ll watch todays news. (Newsclip)
Pauw: Okay, Peter R. de Vries as we announced earlier



More

Pauw: Okay, Peter R. de Vries as we announced earlier, you’ve made a documentary which has aired two or three times. And all three times it got much attention. A lot of people watched it and that indicates that it is a case which in The Netherlands is very well followed by many and that many people are interressed in. According to you, what happened?
Peter: That would be speculating… I wasn’t there…
Pauw: But you make some assumptions that….
Peter: Well I hear the parents now make some statements like: We don’t think Joran would do such a thing, he has respect for girls… But off course many other scenario’s are possible. I don’t say he willingly and knowingly did something to Natalee because of which she deceased. Another scenario is possible in which against his will something happened as a result of which… Well she had drank, she was a vulnerable girl and she could have passed out because of that… Where upon he panicked and instead of calling the police, he called his father and maybe did something different. But okay that’s speculating, but again there are more scenario’s possible where it didn’t start out with any evildoing.
Pauw: What than makes you feel that you have to keep focusing on this investigation. Because you could say as well: ‘Okay this guy now has been so often freed of charges, and nothing has been proven….’
Peter: Well he was not declared ‘not guilty’…
Pauw: Why can’t you say I quit now or I find out what happened by talking to other people
Peter: Well you again invite me to come talk about it so in that sense you keep getting confronted with it.
Pauw: But what is it that triggers you to…
Peter: Well what triggers me is that Joran simply undoubtedly lied about certain things, where at the same time he has no legitimate reason for that. And he hasn’t stated on that very clearly and the fact that he STILL as he was arrested the last time never spoke a word. I think that’s very awkward. And I wonder if that is something his father agrees with as a person who himself wanted to be a judge. And that in such a crucial case where a girl has disappeared and where the mother of that girl is still desperate about the whereabouts of her daughter. That you then still can keep your mouth shut whereas the investigation is aimed at getting clearity on that. And on certain points he has lied and those lies were never cleared by him.
Witt.: Mister Van der Sloot?
Paulus: I agree with Joran totally. Because Joran at that moment couldn’t do anything else. And I have advised Joran to not talk because he allready has said it all. Look…..
Peter: Who says it that he has told everything by now? There simply are still some questions.
Paulus: You have to imagine such an interrogation… And I wondered about that I must say…, such a detective in fact allready has his analysis completed and next he wants confirmation of that. So he starts asking questions… And when you give an answer that doesn’t fit his analysis then there’s another question and another… And then they go back to earlier statements… And at that moment there was nothing left to gain… for nobody… when Joran had started to talk.
Pauw: But what Peter says is that your son has lied several times… and because he has lied it’s logical that the detective keeps asking questions untill he’s heard the truth. And that’s one of the tasks the OM has to do: finding the truth. And you say as a judge in training and later as a lawyer, keep your mouth shut!
Paulus: Yes, and I have explained that. He allready had told everything.
Witt.: So you believe your son 100%… He has nothing to do with the disappearence of Natalee Holloway. What does he have to lose than?
Paulus: It would just create more confusion (OMG!!!)… Look, you must see that Joran has explained it himself as well
Witt.: But he won’t say I did it when he didn’t do it?
Joran: But you as well have to see that now that they had me convined again for these 16 days I was in full isolation… I wasn’t allowed to see anyone, to do anything, read a book, have contacts with others… And that to me was very frustrating. You are powerless against this… or say leave me alone or I walk away from it…
Pauw: But how than is it possible that you knew that these two brothers were released?
Joran: Well it’s a small prison. The womensprison had their court-yard close to my cell-window and from them you hear stuff… They told me what was in the newspapers…
Peter: Okay, he says and his father agrees, I don’t talk again with the OM because everything is allready said. But that off course is the question because there are still things open about which there is no clearity yet. Among which the question how did you get home. My experiences are that and I have seen this very often, that when people further refuse to make any statements most of the time that is not because they lack confidence in the OM but because they forgot their previous lies! And in those cases it’s better to keep silent.
Joran: Well mister De Vries I hope that one day it all comes out and you have to appologize for all the things you’ve said.
Anita: Well I was interrogated by the KLPD as well, for some four hours but the questions were not directed at ‘finding the truth’ but at ‘Joran must hang’. (Edit; because Anita is a bit long-winded in what she says I compress from here on what she says.)
Peter: But I must say that it has taken quite a long time before your son was arrested the first time. And let’s not forget that it was he who came up with very strong lies. Than it’s not strange when justice dep. says: You were the last who was seen with Natalee; you tell us a story that was lied from the first to the last word, …
Anita: (Edited) But I’ve seen some of Joran’s statements and the slightest change in his statement - f.a. at a location where he pointed somewhat more to the left the he had previously done - that was considdered a new statement.
Peter: Well, that inherent to these kinds of investigations. And lets note well that you talk of somewhat more to the left or right but in Joran’s statements there is talk of MILES of differences between locations with his lies! It was all made up!
Pauw: Okay Peter let’s establish two things here. First there is no disagreement about the fact that Joran has lied. You have admitted that and admitted that that was a stupid thing to do. And if you hadn’t done that everything would have gone differently. On the other hand we’ve seen in the Netherlands that in some cases the OM has shown to have a ‘tunnelvision’.
Witt.: Because they think this suspect has to be the one that did it. And in this case there maybe were a number of different things and you address them in your book, that had they not just been directed at Joran then other things could have been investigated. Has that been done in the mean time?
Paulus: No. On the contrary… Now that the judge has decided that Joran is no longer a suspect… The day after that the OM came with the statement that he remains the person that they’re interested in. After two and a half year wherein all possible coercive means were executed. I cannot understand that. At that point in time, after for two and a half year sticking to someones tail the OM should have come to the conclusion that this person is not only no longer a suspect but he must be considerd innocent as well.
Peter: Well if you come up with these kind of theories I am very glad that you didn’t manage to become a judge!
Witt.: When you had two and a half year of investigation…
(Unintelligible.)
Joran: And it has cost over 10 million dollars… They did all kinds of things… Searches, experts, airplanes…
Pauw: What should according to you be investigated that hasn’t been investigated yet?
Paulus: Well, what actually is very strange is that there has never been made a clear profile of the girl. What kind of a girl was she? Which contacts had that girl? I never saw anywhere something very simple, that the computer of the girl was looked into. I never saw that the family of the girl was investigated. Her friends… So actually where you have to start any investigation, the people that are closest to the victim has never been done!?
Peter: You forget the people she was last seen with….
Witt.: Yes I wanted to say that as well… You begin off course with the people she was last seen with. But your suggestion what could that mean.., when you look into her surroundings? What doing so, could possibly be found about what happened on that beach?
Anita: (Edited) We know people were seen at the beach, her room-card was used, there are people who claim they have seen Natalee the day after she went missing…
Witt.: There’s a statement by a cashier who says she first saw Natalee with a man who a short time later she saw without the girl. Has there been no proper investigation into these facts?
Paulus: Well it’s even stronger… There is a videorecording supposedly of Natalee but we untill now haven’t had access to that video.
Anita: (Edited) That’s a video of the entrance of the Holliday inn… And there was something strange with the first posters that Beth Twitty hung up. It read “Little Hoody please call Big Hoody” which suggests Natalee ran away. Anyway, I was under the impression that there was another story that I gladly would have seen investigated.
Witt.: Well this is Natalee’s mother who some percieved being rather fanatic… (Clip of Beth.)
Witt.: Are you in contact with this woman?
Paulus: Our first contact with her was in the beginning… We several times had asked the police if we could get in contact with the family. The police didn’t think that was such a good idea. But some time later she showed up at our door and I invited her in. And there we had a conversation which was VERY intense. I sat with open arms there because we had a lot of sympathie for the situation she was in. And we wanted her to know that.
Anita: We felt that was very difficult… That was a very difficult moment.
Witt.: Did you keep in contact with her? She wanted to come back the next day but didn’t. She did send a television-reporter but she went to the police and gave her account of the conversation.

One more piece of text to come… Tomorrow!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tylergal on January 12, 2008, 07:21:02 PM
Did I hear correctly today on Fox, that Anita wants the investigation investigated?  Hmmm, oh, please.  Anita, you can join OJ, another perpetrator who wants the investigation investigated since he is the victim, like your son, Anita.  All stalkers and especially stalkers who murder, are said to claim they are the victims rather than the perpetrators.  Makes me go hmmm.

The Sloots gave an interview Tyler.  Do you want the link to the translation.

There is also a video of the interview.

Thanks, San.  I saw that but did you see the Fox report this a.m.? Where they stated the "mother of one of the suspects" (with pictures of gauzy blouse) had asked for an investigation of the investigation.  I suppose they were taking this from the interview, but just wondered if anyone else saw it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Anna on January 12, 2008, 07:21:34 PM
Too bad deVries didn't punch out Joran's lights.

I hope he presses assault charges.
.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: robots on January 12, 2008, 07:22:05 PM
keep talking sloots

keep digging that hole


i mean you already dig one hole that you put Natalee in and now you are digging another for yourselves

my thought print says you people are EVIL


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tylergal on January 12, 2008, 07:23:52 PM
Quote
Paulus: Well look uhhhh… Mister De Vries can’t hear that good… If he would have listened carefully he would have heard that Joran said that he didn’t have any confidence in the OM (public pros.)! That’s what Joran has said. Joran didn’t talk about the judicial authorities. What you see now.., what has happened is that luckely we have judicial authorities… And we sit here again! So in the end it’s because of the judicial authorities that all has ended well.

OK...you just said it all paulus...you have faith in the judges because they made sure to it your son's crime was covered up!!! you a-hole!!! so sorry!!! crap..we have been saying this for 2 1/2 years!!! Pualus had the judges cover for him!!!

Well, it seems Joran is wise beyond his years here, having no confidence in the public prosecutor but awaiting the decision of his father's comrades, well paid (off) fraternity who feed from the same trough as Paulus, the old money bucket.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: wreck on January 12, 2008, 07:23:59 PM
Instead of wine -- they should have pumped him full of Vodtka. Let the "truth serum" work!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tylergal on January 12, 2008, 07:27:08 PM
Haven't see the comments of Peter DeVries after the booze-throwing episode posted.  If it has been, please delete:

Translated by Lazlo:


Transcript of the NOS radio interview with de Vries and Witteman:

De Vries: I did not see it (coming) myself, but the moment when I was not watching Joran threw a glass of red wine into my face, and it was alcohol so it itched for a while, it was a strange ending of the program.

Interviewer: The ending was sort of tense wasn't it?

De Vries: Well I think the end was not that...

Interviewer (interrupts) : Well he did not believe that you would ever apologize if it turned out to be something else.

De Vries: Well that is his good right to not believe that. But other then that, the broadcasting was spicy but did not get out of hand or anything. So I was very surprised that after the show he then suddenly throws a glass of wine into your face.

Interviewer: What do you think about this?

De Vries: Well this tells something about Joran of course.

Interviewer: What? (does it say about Joran?)

De Vries: That he cannot control his behavior.
His parents did their best to insist during the broadcasting that their son was well mannered, that he always was correct with girls, that there were so many things he would just never do.
Then I think to myself, well this probably was something the parents would have agreed upon in advance also our child would never do something like that.

Interviewer: He was standing here, he does not want to talk to us, he said this was the last interview we ever gave.
Ehm, his mother was very angry with him.

De Vries: Yes his mother of course was embarrassed hugely, she had tried so hard to protect her son, and to present him as a well mannered young man.
On the moment that after such a conversation he does something like this then everything the parents tried to do he destroys that with such an act of course.

Interviewer: What a strange ending of the broadcasting!

Paul Witteman:Yes, horrible. And ridiculous!
This did not make any sense at all.

Interviewer: How do you feel about the program?

Witteman: I found it exiting and balanced.

Interviewer: Ppl who were watching claim you have allowed Joran to talk very lengthy.

Witteman: Yes, he was of course the main guest. And Peter de Vries can take very good care of himself that was obvious in this broadcasting, verbally that is.
And we now had the occasion to get the discussion going between these two, and that had not happened prior. So we let that happen.
But a fact is that Joran van der Sloot was released, was interrogated in many ways, that the justice in Aruba does not see grounds for prosecution, and that juridically then there is something like, then it has to be over with, that is why we made the show now, as in; what now, ho to go from here.

Interviewer: I had the feeling you were defending Joran at times during the show towards Peter de Vries.

Witteman: I honestly feel that Peter de Vries, who of course has investigated, in Aruba, but he did not found much damaging material that would make Joran closer to the qualification of a murderer, and that is why I feel why Joran during such a program, when he is being called a liar over and over again, I do not feel it being not correct to defend your guest a little bit. That would go the other way around also by the way.

Interviewer: And what Joran van der Sloot then does at the end, how would you want to qualify that?

Witteman: Incredible and hugely stupid.
I mean it was of course the intention of the family van der Sloot to come her and show they want to continue their lives, and that they want to leave this case behind them, but that will be difficult as long as the body of Natalee has not been found, and when you want to get at least some understanding of the public, you of course should not perfrom things like this (referring to throwing wine).

Interviewer: How would you describe this broadcasting?

Witteman: The broadcasting itself, I found it to be very good and exciting.

Interviewer: The ending though was sort of strange.

Witteman: Dramatically, and nasty and incredible.


http://player.nos.nl/index.php/media/play/tcmid/tcm:5-343390/
 
 

http://blogsfornatalee.com/forum/index.php?topic=8130.135

Translation by Lazlo posted at BFN by Debbie.
Lacking in self control and self discipline then, one can only imagine how many times he has kicked his brothers out of anger when he did not have his way or how many dogs he has killed or maimed and how many unsuspecting girls could have met their demise at his hands had he not had his way with them after drugging them and taking them back to sleep it off before boarding their planes.  What does this tell me?  Natalee fought him and he had to kill her because she threatened not only his reindeer games but Paulus' own little covert operations within the government, AHATA, et al.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: sirensong on January 12, 2008, 07:30:07 PM
The look on Joran's face as he picks up the glass of wine.........priceless.  Yes, good thing there were no guns.

And I am sick of hearing Paul say Joran was "aquitted".


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 12, 2008, 07:31:32 PM

Posted by EURobert on the front page of SM - transcription of the show last night:

Transscript and translation of last nights Pauw en Witteman tv-show (Please excuse me for all the grammatical and typing errors that will be in here; it’s to time-consuming to do it flawless…. Mr. Witteman’s first name is Paul so I’ll call PaulvdS: ‘Paulus’; that’s easier for me… To not get confused…)

<snipped>

Pauw: But why did you do that? Why did you agree on making up this particular story?

Joran: Yes.., yes… Why this story? I just was scared at that moment… Those parents suddenly were at our house… And yes… I didn’t have a clue either what to do next.

Pauw: And so you decide the three of you to make up one story and this is how we’re going to tell it.

Peter: You just can tell the truth can you, when nothing happened? There’s no reason to lie is there?

Joran: Yes, I don’t think the truth sounds that good if you have to say you left a girl at the beach.

Peter: So you think a lie sounds better than the truth?

Joran: Well I didn’t know how serious this all was. I didn’t know there was a serious problem.

Peter: That’s exacly why it is so strange to lie!? When you don’t know that there is a serious problem there is no reason to lie at all!? That’s exactly the strange thing of lying here!?

Pauw: Peter… Peter you a father of a teenager, well maybe that’s a bit insipid, father of a young daughter… You can imagine you do something… leaving a girl at the beach… Let’s just tell I decently brought her back…. Such a little lie you can imagine can you?

Peter: No, I can’t imagine that Jeroen… I think you must try to see the psychology behind that. When he doesn’t know what has happened to that girl and she, after she slept away her drunkenness, simply shows up again then he is really caught lying! The fact that he nevertheless tells this lie you can interpret as: he knew he wouldn’t get caught telling this lie. Because he knew Natalee wouldn’t show up again!

<snipped>



Peter Devries' words said it all in the above quote.

Janet

+++++++++++++

"My dear Watson," said he, "I cannot agree with those who rank modesty among the virtues. To the logician all things should be seen exactly as they are, and to underestimate one's self is as much a departure from truth as to exaggerate one's own powers."
Sir Arthur Conan Doyle


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 12, 2008, 07:33:07 PM
******* ... would you please fix the above post.  I messed up.

Thank you.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tylergal on January 12, 2008, 07:36:08 PM
Joran: Yes, I don’t think the truth sounds that good if you have to say you left a girl at the beach.

*Yes, I don't think.*  Hmmm.  Yes, he knows he did it and no, it is not good that he killed her and had to make up a lie about the beach --- that is what this tells me.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Anna on January 12, 2008, 07:37:39 PM
Hello Anna Banana   




 :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool:


 :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink:


Hi, Robots!   :D


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Observer on January 12, 2008, 07:43:49 PM
If he thought his son was not lying for such a long time, why was he telling all 3 boys during the first 10 days, no body no case? In fact, how did he know there was no body?

He was already calling Natalee a corpse or a body in the 1st or second day that Natalee dissapeared.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: San on January 12, 2008, 07:43:56 PM
No video yet but some photos are showing up  :wink:

http://www.telegraaf.nl/binnenland/3008566/_Joran_gooit_wijn_naar_Peter_R.__.html?p=16,1

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/JoranPetertv.gif)

What a sneak he is.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: San on January 12, 2008, 07:46:12 PM
The look on Joran's face as he picks up the glass of wine.........priceless.  Yes, good thing there were no guns.

And I am sick of hearing Paul say Joran was "aquitted".

He is evil.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Anna on January 12, 2008, 07:49:04 PM
Joran's appearance is not improving with age.  He is at the age when most people look the best they ever will.  I wonder what the significance of the baseball cap is.  And he doesn't even remove it when seated.  I believe that is usually expected in a situation like this one and also when in a position to have ones face exposed in answering questions.  Rather like hiding to answer them from underneath the brim of the cap. 

I can just hear him bragging to the other pimps about throwing the drink on de Vries as though that took some kind of read courage to dash a drink at somebody who is totally not expecting it.

Joran seems to have stopped his visits to the psychiatrist a bit prematurely from every indication.  Perhaps Anita would like to schedule a few more sessions for him at this time.  Someone sure needs to.  This boy is a real nutcase!  I think he may well be insane just as vd Stratten suggested. 

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: MuffyBee on January 12, 2008, 07:53:32 PM
Someone stated that the wine throwing occurred during the running of the credits. I have not watched the show yet -- is it there????

I don't think it has been posted yet wreck but rumors it WAS caught on tape.

Whether or not it was caught on tape, there were witnesses, right?  Of course, catching it on tape would be the best evidence.  Is there any law against what Joran did?  Could charges be pressed?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 12, 2008, 07:57:47 PM
No video yet but some photos are showing up  :wink:

http://www.telegraaf.nl/binnenland/3008566/_Joran_gooit_wijn_naar_Peter_R.__.html?p=16,1

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/JoranPetertv.gif)

Joran's behavior says more than all of the spinning that Anita and Paulus tried to do.
Don't you know they are soooo proud of their fine lying POS son.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: SunnyinTX on January 12, 2008, 08:08:17 PM
Good Evening to all.....klaasend, Lala'sMom, Anna, tealady, Tylergal, Kat_Gram, Magnolia, LouiseVargas, MuffyBee, greeneyedlady and 20 Guests are viewing this topic.

Thanks to everyone for posting the interview, the photos and a special thanks to RURobert for the translations.....looks like the sporter once again lost control...this time it was only a glass of wine....what will it be the next time and the time after that and all the times to follow.....another dead innocent young woman?   What makes me think this will NOT be their last interview :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tylergal on January 12, 2008, 08:09:04 PM
No video yet but some photos are showing up  :wink:

http://www.telegraaf.nl/binnenland/3008566/_Joran_gooit_wijn_naar_Peter_R.__.html?p=16,1

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/JoranPetertv.gif)

Joran's behavior says more than all of the spinning that Anita and Paulus tried to do.
Don't you know they are soooo proud of their fine lying POS son.

This looks very pre-planned with the host in the loop with Joran. Notice, as soon as he does this, he looks back for approval from the host, who appears to have tucked his head because he knew in advance, and tucking his head gives him that old "I didn't see it coming" alibi.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 12, 2008, 08:10:52 PM
 January 12, 2008 @ 11:08 am
Joran van der Sloot draait door Joran van der Sloot runs through
 Joran van der Sloot heeft gisteren een glas water (of wijn) over Peter R. Joran van der Sloot yesterday a glass of water (or wine) on Peter R. de Vries gegooid na het programma Paul & Witteman waar hij te gast was. De Vries thrown after the program & Paul Witteman where he was a guest. Blijkbaar was hij niet zo blij met alle argumenten waar Peter R. Apparently, he was not so happy with all the arguments which Peter R. de Vries mee aankwam. De Vries it arrived. Had hij goed door dat het kleine beetje mensen dat nog in zijn onschuld geloofden, nu ook wel eens andere dingen zouden kunnen gaan denken. Had he carefully that the little people that still believed in his innocence, now also known as "other things could go thinking. Zijn ware aard kwam ook direct na de aftiteling naar boven. His true nature came directly after the credits up. Hij gooide een glas water over Peter R. He threw a glass of water over Peter R. de Vries. De Vries. Ik denk dat hij hem het liefste op zijn bek had willen slaan. I think he prefer him on his mouth had wanted to save. Maar ja, dan val je helemaal 100% door de mand. But yes, then you fall entirely 100% by the basket. Wel jammer voor hem, straks geloofd niemand hem meer. Well sorry for him, soon no one believed him anymore. Je weet het eigenlijk al als je in zijn ogen kijkt. You know it all if you look in his eyes. Ogen liegen niet. Eyes do not lie. Gisteren bij Jensen was ook een stukje van hem te zien, hoe zenuwachtig hij werd toen Jensen het had over de tijd tussen het strand en thuiskomen. Yesterday when Jensen was also a piece of him to see how nervous he was when Jensen was talking about the time between the beach and coming home. Ik ben benieuwd hoe heel het Holloway verhaal zich in de toekomst uitvouwt. I am very curious how the Holloway story in the future uitvouwt. Waarschijnlijk zal het geen verrassing zijn. Probably it will be no surprise.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tylergal on January 12, 2008, 08:14:03 PM
Joran's appearance is not improving with age.  He is at the age when most people look the best they ever will.  I wonder what the significance of the baseball cap is.  And he doesn't even remove it when seated.  I believe that is usually expected in a situation like this one and also when in a position to have ones face exposed in answering questions.  Rather like hiding to answer them from underneath the brim of the cap. 

I can just hear him bragging to the other pimps about throwing the drink on de Vries as though that took some kind of read courage to dash a drink at somebody who is totally not expecting it.

Joran seems to have stopped his visits to the psychiatrist a bit prematurely from every indication.  Perhaps Anita would like to schedule a few more sessions for him at this time.  Someone sure needs to.  This boy is a real nutcase!  I think he may well be insane just as vd Stratten suggested. 

.

I was not going to bring that up, Anna, about the hat and the seeming weight loss, but Joran looks worse than I have ever seen him and you are right about kids looking their very best at that first-second year in college.  When my boys were in undergraduate, graduate and postgraduate school, respectively, I had their portrait done because I knew that was the most handsome they would ever all be at that point in their lives and of course, it was.  They are so good looking at that 20-30 time in their lives but not for Joran.  I have seen chemotherapy patient with that same gaunt look hiding under baseball caps and baggy clothes what was obvious to anyone willing to look into it.  Couple chronic illness with virulent medications and depression and that is the look you get.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 12, 2008, 08:16:18 PM
I'm embarrassed to ask this, but where is the actual video of the interview? Is it in this thread? I thought there were just the transcripts.


I think it's on the Pauw en Witteman website.  Maybe?  I've been reading.
http://pauwenwitteman.vara.nl/uitzending.php?id=274

I've been behind for a while, but am unable to view the video....I get a message in Dutch that translates to 'Unfortunately your browser does not support (sufficient) Java script to reflect the player. Read here how you can integrate Java script. We work for a solution for this problem.'

Haven't attempted to investigate further.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 12, 2008, 08:18:15 PM
Joran's appearance is not improving with age.  He is at the age when most people look the best they ever will.  I wonder what the significance of the baseball cap is.  And he doesn't even remove it when seated.  I believe that is usually expected in a situation like this one and also when in a position to have ones face exposed in answering questions.  Rather like hiding to answer them from underneath the brim of the cap. 

I can just hear him bragging to the other pimps about throwing the drink on de Vries as though that took some kind of read courage to dash a drink at somebody who is totally not expecting it.

Joran seems to have stopped his visits to the psychiatrist a bit prematurely from every indication.  Perhaps Anita would like to schedule a few more sessions for him at this time.  Someone sure needs to.  This boy is a real nutcase!  I think he may well be insane just as vd Stratten suggested. 

.

I was not going to bring that up, Anna, about the hat and the seeming weight loss, but Joran looks worse than I have ever seen him and you are right about kids looking their very best at that first-second year in college.  When my boys were in undergraduate, graduate and postgraduate school, respectively, I had their portrait done because I knew that was the most handsome they would ever all be at that point in their lives and of course, it was.  They are so good looking at that 20-30 time in their lives but not for Joran.  I have seen chemotherapy patient with that same gaunt look hiding under baseball caps and baggy clothes what was obvious to anyone willing to look into it.  Couple chronic illness with virulent medications and depression and that is the look you get.

He's not sick.  He is just mean and the guilt is eating away at him.  I hope he never
gets a good nights sleep as long as he lives.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 12, 2008, 08:19:36 PM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/Fromtheshow.jpg)

BUMP

This does say that Rikkert did get a photo, correct????  :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: SunnyinTX on January 12, 2008, 08:21:51 PM
No video yet but some photos are showing up  :wink:

http://www.telegraaf.nl/binnenland/3008566/_Joran_gooit_wijn_naar_Peter_R.__.html?p=16,1

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/JoranPetertv.gif)

Joran's behavior says more than all of the spinning that Anita and Paulus tried to do.
Don't you know they are soooo proud of their fine lying POS son.

This looks very pre-planned with the host in the loop with Joran. Notice, as soon as he does this, he looks back for approval from the host, who appears to have tucked his head because he knew in advance, and tucking his head gives him that old "I didn't see it coming" alibi.

It looks to me like the host is grinning!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tylergal on January 12, 2008, 08:23:19 PM
No video yet but some photos are showing up  :wink:

http://www.telegraaf.nl/binnenland/3008566/_Joran_gooit_wijn_naar_Peter_R.__.html?p=16,1

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/JoranPetertv.gif)

Joran's behavior says more than all of the spinning that Anita and Paulus tried to do.
Don't you know they are soooo proud of their fine lying POS son.

This looks very pre-planned with the host in the loop with Joran. Notice, as soon as he does this, he looks back for approval from the host, who appears to have tucked his head because he knew in advance, and tucking his head gives him that old "I didn't see it coming" alibi.

It looks to me like the host is grinning!!

I agree, Sunny.  He looks like he had tuck his head to keep from laughing and instead, flashed a grin at Joran, as an approving nod.  I suspect this was staged.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 12, 2008, 08:23:31 PM
Private Eye - check your email (junk mail)  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: SunnyinTX on January 12, 2008, 08:23:35 PM
OT!  Hi Mrs. RED!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: SunnyinTX on January 12, 2008, 08:25:16 PM
No video yet but some photos are showing up  :wink:

http://www.telegraaf.nl/binnenland/3008566/_Joran_gooit_wijn_naar_Peter_R.__.html?p=16,1

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/JoranPetertv.gif)

Joran's behavior says more than all of the spinning that Anita and Paulus tried to do.
Don't you know they are soooo proud of their fine lying POS son.

This looks very pre-planned with the host in the loop with Joran. Notice, as soon as he does this, he looks back for approval from the host, who appears to have tucked his head because he knew in advance, and tucking his head gives him that old "I didn't see it coming" alibi.

It looks to me like the host is grinning!!

I agree, Sunny.  He looks like he had tuck his head to keep from laughing and instead, flashed a grin at Joran, as an approving nod.  I suspect this was staged.

Tyler...I think I agree...look, no reaction from anita at all :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tylergal on January 12, 2008, 08:26:04 PM
Joran's appearance is not improving with age.  He is at the age when most people look the best they ever will.  I wonder what the significance of the baseball cap is.  And he doesn't even remove it when seated.  I believe that is usually expected in a situation like this one and also when in a position to have ones face exposed in answering questions.  Rather like hiding to answer them from underneath the brim of the cap. 

I can just hear him bragging to the other pimps about throwing the drink on de Vries as though that took some kind of read courage to dash a drink at somebody who is totally not expecting it.

Joran seems to have stopped his visits to the psychiatrist a bit prematurely from every indication.  Perhaps Anita would like to schedule a few more sessions for him at this time.  Someone sure needs to.  This boy is a real nutcase!  I think he may well be insane just as vd Stratten suggested. 

.

I was not going to bring that up, Anna, about the hat and the seeming weight loss, but Joran looks worse than I have ever seen him and you are right about kids looking their very best at that first-second year in college.  When my boys were in undergraduate, graduate and postgraduate school, respectively, I had their portrait done because I knew that was the most handsome they would ever all be at that point in their lives and of course, it was.  They are so good looking at that 20-30 time in their lives but not for Joran.  I have seen chemotherapy patient with that same gaunt look hiding under baseball caps and baggy clothes what was obvious to anyone willing to look into it.  Couple chronic illness with virulent medications and depression and that is the look you get.

He's not sick.  He is just mean and the guilt is eating away at him.  I hope he never
gets a good nights sleep as long as he lives.

He could be sick physically, emotionally and mentally.  His lifestyle is not  conducive to longevity.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 12, 2008, 08:28:23 PM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/JoranPeter1.jpg)

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/JoranPeter2.jpg)

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/JoranPeter3.jpg)

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/JoranPeter4.jpg)

Camera can't find a good side for AVDS, it seems.   :P


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 12, 2008, 08:29:02 PM
Closeup of Joran when he threw the wine on DeVries:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/Joranthrowingwine.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 12, 2008, 08:30:57 PM
Are Paulus and Ramm ... who are of the same mindset ... implying that the prosecutor got it wrong every time in the Natalee Holloway case in her determination regarding the serious/strong suspicions that are required under Dutch law to detain suspects.  Are Paulus and Ramm both claiming that Karin Janssen was a complete incompetent and ... the judges are gods.

Janet

++++++++++++++

Paulus van der Sloot
WITTEMAN SHOW
January 12, 2008


Paulus: Well look uhhhh… Mister De Vries can’t hear that good… If he would have listened carefully he would have heard that Joran said that he didn’t have any confidence in the OM (public pros.)! That’s what Joran has said. Joran didn’t talk about the judicial authorities. What you see now.., what has happened is that luckely we have judicial authorities… And we sit here again! So in the end it’s because of the judicial authorities that all has ended well.


Ramm
BFN
August 7, 2006
Tue Aug 07, 12:23:00 AM EDT


IMHO there have been no improper judicial decisions. All the decisions were made in accordance with law and jurisprudence. The judge may only use as evidence the materials that are presented during trial. If the DA doesn't do what it is supposed to do and present "legal and convincing" evidence then no judge will rule for the prosecution.

++++++++++++

June, 2007

Mickey John:  first and second-degree murder and capital kidnapping.

Abraham Jones:  first and second-degree murder and capital kidnapping.
 
Joran van der Sllot:  Suspicion of murder and kidnapping as well as being an accessory to murder

Deepak Kalpoe:   Suspicion of murder and kidnapping as well as being an accessory to murder.

Satish Kalpoe:  Suspicion of murder and kidnapping as well as being an accessory to murder.

Steve Croes:   Suspicion of murder and kidnapping as well as being an accessory to murder.   

Paulus van der Sloot:  complicity to pre-meditated murder, complicity to kidnapping and murder and kidnapping.


August, 2005

Deepak Kalpoe and Satish Kalpoe:  Suspected of the primary criminal act of together with other people committing premeditated murder, alternately together with other people murdering somebody, more alternately rob a person of her liberty with fatal consequences and even more alternately, raping somebody and new suspicions.


April, 2006

Geoffrey van Cromvoirt:  criminal offenses that may be related to the disappearance" of Natalee Holloway.

Guido Weaver:  Assisting in the murder, heavy battery and kidnapping" of the teen


August, 2005

Freddy Alexander Zedan-Arambatzis: suspicion of having unspecified "physical contact" with a female minor.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tylergal on January 12, 2008, 08:31:56 PM
Closeup of Joran when he threw the wine on DeVries:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/Joranthrowingwine.jpg)


Send that big boy to Baghdad, let him find out what it is like to engage the enemy!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 12, 2008, 08:32:37 PM
The Paulus quote above should be dated January 12, 2008.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: SunnyinTX on January 12, 2008, 08:40:16 PM
Closeup of Joran when he threw the wine on DeVries:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/Joranthrowingwine.jpg)


Send that big boy to Baghdad, let him find out what it is like to engage the enemy!

I can never ever remember honestly wishing harm to another person in my life.....but I actually have wished that someone beat him to death.....make him suffer for a long time.....so if that makes me a bad person...Ok...I am a bad person.....hell I'd even like to HELP beat him!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Observer on January 12, 2008, 08:43:41 PM
I watched the video and it was remarkeable seeing the facial expressions,especially De vries. He clearly was looking Joran and Paul in the eyes knowing they know alot more and aren't telling the truth. I tried to screen capture them but for some reason it only comes up black in that video format :(


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 12, 2008, 08:44:52 PM
Thanks Klaas ... for fixing my posts.  I think I will call it a night.   :wink:

A continuing game of Monopoly with grandsons (8/9) is where it is at tonight.

Janet
5:45 PM


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 12, 2008, 08:54:53 PM
I agree with Beth (Surprise! Surprise!).  :lol:  I hope that Joran keeps accepting invitations to be guests on talk shows.  Everytime he talks ... he puts that big sneaker ... or was it sneakers ... in his mouth.

Janet

+++++++++++

Beth - Greta/Joran Interview Response

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,188645,00.html
March 21, 2006

VAN SUSTEREN: Now, you and I have spent an awful lot of time together, talked together. You know my entire staff. Was it difficult for you that we sat down with him?

TWITTY: Oh, no. No, I mean, I think that any time that we can get Joran speaking, I think that he only incriminates himself every time.  And you know, I've heard his offer that he is willing to sit down with myself or with Dave or the family, and absolutely, I would do it. I would go to Holland. I'd meet him wherever he would choose to. But you know, Greta, I would have to have one polygraph expert with me because, you know, just having Joran talk without any type of repercussions — I mean, I think those days are over for him. You know, I'd like to get to the bottom of where his lies are, and I think that a polygraph expert could help do that.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: MuffyBee on January 12, 2008, 09:03:39 PM
Just a thought here, but maybe that little stunt by Joran has to do with some publicity for an upcoming book by Anita.  I thought she was going to write one? 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 12, 2008, 09:04:48 PM
I agree with Beth (Surprise! Surprise!).  :lol:  I hope that Joran keeps accepting invitations to be guests on talk shows.  Everytime he talks ... he puts that big sneaker ... or was it sneakers ... in his mouth.

Janet

+++++++++++

Beth - Greta/Joran Interview Response

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,188645,00.html
March 21, 2006

VAN SUSTEREN: Now, you and I have spent an awful lot of time together, talked together. You know my entire staff. Was it difficult for you that we sat down with him?

TWITTY: Oh, no. No, I mean, I think that any time that we can get Joran speaking, I think that he only incriminates himself every time.  And you know, I've heard his offer that he is willing to sit down with myself or with Dave or the family, and absolutely, I would do it. I would go to Holland. I'd meet him wherever he would choose to. But you know, Greta, I would have to have one polygraph expert with me because, you know, just having Joran talk without any type of repercussions — I mean, I think those days are over for him. You know, I'd like to get to the bottom of where his lies are, and I think that a polygraph expert could help do that.


I think Beth should rephrase her offer and agree for her and her family to meet with him as he asked, only in private::))))))) Apparently it would be easy to get to the bottom of this.

As for his weight loss, I do know cocaine makes you lose weight, as does XTC. He sure is looking gaunt. I would think that considering his alleged sexual ambivalence and drug use, the risk that aids could be waiting him on his path that Anita has directed him to travel is great.

Anita needs to understand that positive things can come in prison, but nothing good is available on this path. Are you enjoying your Sportster Anita? He appears to be a joy to be around:))))))


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tylergal on January 12, 2008, 09:07:51 PM
XTC can and does become highly addictive to the user and it is said that it is even harder to kick the XTC habit than cocaine or nicotine.  Along with these drugs that offer delusions of grandeur, come inhibitions and deviant sexual proclivities.  Not saying Joran is living that way, but it is something for one to contemplate.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 12, 2008, 09:08:22 PM
Just a thought here, but maybe that little stunt by Joran has to do with some publicity for an upcoming book by Anita.  I thought she was going to write one? 

I don't think that was a PR stunt, and if it was they need to fire Aruba's PR agency. That show cased his uncontrollable anger. If he can't hold it together when he is selling himself, then imagine when the camera is not rolling. And Anita pointing out he has been to a shrink for lying, that she could not contyrol him, etc. Or mayube his PR firm is a double agent:))))))))


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 12, 2008, 09:10:49 PM
I probably would have laughed myself if I had been there. Not with Joran but at him. He hasn't learned the difference yet.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 12, 2008, 09:16:24 PM
I probably would have laughed myself if I had been there. Not with Joran but at him. He hasn't learned the difference yet.

Yes, I would have laughed too out of shock at what had just happened.  Then I'd laugh at what an ASS Joran is.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Observer on January 12, 2008, 09:17:19 PM
(http://img80.imageshack.us/img80/2494/joranzi0.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)
(http://img141.imageshack.us/img141/37/joran1jpgsi1.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Observer on January 12, 2008, 09:20:15 PM
Just a thought here, but maybe that little stunt by Joran has to do with some publicity for an upcoming book by Anita.  I thought she was going to write one? 

I don't think that was a PR stunt, and if it was they need to fire Aruba's PR agency. That show cased his uncontrollable anger. If he can't hold it together when he is selling himself, then imagine when the camera is not rolling. And Anita pointing out he has been to a shrink for lying, that she could not contyrol him, etc. Or mayube his PR firm is a double agent:))))))))

Her book was ready to come out 6 months ago..I think it's more than just anger its arrogance..Joran realy needs to be taught a lesson as he has got away with everything his whole life.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tylergal on January 12, 2008, 09:20:23 PM
I probably would have laughed myself if I had been there. Not with Joran but at him. He hasn't learned the difference yet.

Yes, I would have laughed too out of shock at what had just happened.  Then I'd laugh at what an ASS Joran is.

I am not sure I would have laughed.  I would have been taken aback.  Maybe just the difference in personalities, but I would be horrified to see someone behaving in such a disruptive and obstreperous manner in a civilized setting.  But that's just me.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 12, 2008, 09:21:50 PM
XTC can and does become highly addictive to the user and it is said that it is even harder to kick the XTC habit than cocaine or nicotine.  Along with these drugs that offer delusions of grandeur, come inhibitions and deviant sexual proclivities.  Not saying Joran is living that way, but it is something for one to contemplate.

I don't know much about XTC, but I know if one is drinking a line of cocaine will
counter the effects of the alcohol almost immediately.  Stimulant vs depressant
I guess.  Is XTC a stimulant?  I would not be surprised if Joran is doing cocaine.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 12, 2008, 09:25:16 PM
I probably would have laughed myself if I had been there. Not with Joran but at him. He hasn't learned the difference yet.

Yes, I would have laughed too out of shock at what had just happened.  Then I'd laugh at what an ASS Joran is.

I am not sure I would have laughed.  I would have been taken aback.  Maybe just the difference in personalities, but I would be horrified to see someone behaving in such a disruptive and obstreperous manner in a civilized setting.  But that's just me.

I think it was a shock laugh.  I tend to do that in an unexpected situation.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 12, 2008, 09:31:31 PM
I still haven't been able to watch the video, it just keeps buffering.  Wish I could then I'd get more screen captures  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Observer on January 12, 2008, 09:33:01 PM
XTC can and does become highly addictive to the user and it is said that it is even harder to kick the XTC habit than cocaine or nicotine.  Along with these drugs that offer delusions of grandeur, come inhibitions and deviant sexual proclivities.  Not saying Joran is living that way, but it is something for one to contemplate.

I don't know much about XTC, but I know if one is drinking a line of cocaine will
counter the effects of the alcohol almost immediately.  Stimulant vs depressant
I guess.  Is XTC a stimulant?  I would not be surprised if Joran is doing cocaine.
I'M not sure whats it's classified under but it should be a stimulant. I have been told the high you get are a cross between lsd and crystal meth..Total body high but you are totally alert,lots of energy and they trip out similar to lsd but not as intense.

Not the type of drug you would give to someone if you wanted to rape them or film them against there approval. XTC normally comes in a pill form. What they probably gave Natalee was liquid xtc or ghb. Where she would be in and out of consciousness and would not remember anything after she woke up. Similar to the 3 that came forward against Joran. The first girl said she woke up and Joran was sexually assaulting her.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: crazybabyborg on January 12, 2008, 09:33:34 PM
No video yet but some photos are showing up  :wink:

http://www.telegraaf.nl/binnenland/3008566/_Joran_gooit_wijn_naar_Peter_R.__.html?p=16,1

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/JoranPetertv.gif)

Joran's behavior says more than all of the spinning that Anita and Paulus tried to do.
Don't you know they are soooo proud of their fine lying POS son.

This looks very pre-planned with the host in the loop with Joran. Notice, as soon as he does this, he looks back for approval from the host, who appears to have tucked his head because he knew in advance, and tucking his head gives him that old "I didn't see it coming" alibi.

It looks to me like the host is grinning!!

I agree, Sunny.  He looks like he had tuck his head to keep from laughing and instead, flashed a grin at Joran, as an approving nod.  I suspect this was staged.

Tyler...I think I agree...look, no reaction from anita at all :roll:

I'm not so sure there isn't a reaction from Anita. If you look at the frame where the wine hits him in the face, then go to the next one, Anita turns toward the direction of DeVries and is looking down.......I'm sure there is wine splatter/spill in the direction she is looking on the chair or floor. She didn't see it happen and may not have even realized what Joran has done at the point in the last frame. The next several frames would be interesting.

I'm also not so sure the host knew what Joran was about to do either and the grin could have been unrelated. It takes a minute to grasp what happened when something as bizaare as that occurs.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: sirensong on January 12, 2008, 09:37:13 PM
When you go to the last picture of the set (of Joran throwing the wine) and enlarge it, I don't think the host is smiling-there is a background that makes it look like that.

I watched some of the video, and it is VERY interesting to watch the family VDS.  The body language is very telling.  I swear there are times Joran is thinking "oh Anita, shut up".   At one point Anita looks at Paul while Joran is talking, as if she was watching his reaction to what Joran said.  Joran just widens his  eyes blinks and smiles like he is oh so innocent.  The only person he is fooling is his mother.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 12, 2008, 09:37:36 PM
I still haven't been able to watch the video, it just keeps buffering.  Wish I could then I'd get more screen captures  :wink:

Klaas,
I am sure you know this, but it kept buffering for me until I clicked
up in the top right corner a little box that says RSS.
Then it ran fine.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Observer on January 12, 2008, 09:39:03 PM
I still haven't been able to watch the video, it just keeps buffering.  Wish I could then I'd get more screen captures  :wink:

I watched the whole thing but can only save the screen captures in Opera Browser :( If I could do it in IE then I could capture much better pics and bigger.

(http://img231.imageshack.us/img231/5446/joran2jpghu8.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: sirensong on January 12, 2008, 09:39:53 PM
And I forgot to say:  That DEFINATELY is Paulus on the casino video.....  Did he change what arm he wears his watch on, or has  it always been left?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 12, 2008, 09:41:11 PM
I still haven't been able to watch the video, it just keeps buffering.  Wish I could then I'd get more screen captures  :wink:

Klaas,
I am sure you know this, but it kept buffering for me until I clicked
up in the top right corner a little box that says RSS.
Then it ran fine.


No, I didn't know that, lolol  :lol:  I'll try again.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 12, 2008, 09:41:58 PM
I probably would have laughed myself if I had been there. Not with Joran but at him. He hasn't learned the difference yet.

Yes, I would have laughed too out of shock at what had just happened.  Then I'd laugh at what an ASS Joran is.


He looked so pathetic that I almost feel a little pity for him. He needs help, obviously, and apparently has no one who can help him. I don't know what Anita thinks is going to happen to save him barring him confessing to this. Once he is fully grown, this ingrained on him, she is no longer going to be able to get him the help that he needs. And life will deal with him.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 12, 2008, 09:43:11 PM
I still haven't been able to watch the video, it just keeps buffering.  Wish I could then I'd get more screen captures  :wink:

Klaas,
I am sure you know this, but it kept buffering for me until I clicked
up in the top right corner a little box that says RSS.
Then it ran fine.


No, I didn't know that, lolol  :lol:  I'll try again.

Let us know if that doesn't work


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Observer on January 12, 2008, 09:43:58 PM
When you go to the last picture of the set (of Joran throwing the wine) and enlarge it, I don't think the host is smiling-there is a background that makes it look like that.

I watched some of the video, and it is VERY interesting to watch the family VDS.  The body language is very telling.  I swear there are times Joran is thinking "oh Anita, shut up".   At one point Anita looks at Paul while Joran is talking, as if she was watching his reaction to what Joran said.  Joran just widens his  eyes blinks and smiles like he is oh so innocent.  The only person he is fooling is his mother.

The body language and expressions are very interesting. Peter stares them down eye to eye and Joran and Paul look right back with nasty looks. Not much standing in the Van Der Sloots way now a days in holland except this guy..Peter De Vries certainly looks like he is one person who thinks the sloots are FOS.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: dennisintn on January 12, 2008, 09:45:14 PM
I probably would have laughed myself if I had been there. Not with Joran but at him. He hasn't learned the difference yet.

Yes, I would have laughed too out of shock at what had just happened.  Then I'd laugh at what an ASS Joran is.


He looked so pathetic that I almost feel a little pity for him. He needs help, obviously, and apparently has no one who can help him. I don't know what Anita thinks is going to happen to save him barring him confessing to this. Once he is fully grown, this ingrained on him, she is no longer going to be able to get him the help that he needs. And life will deal with him.
his victims will have to deal with him.  until one of them turns the tables and kills him.
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 12, 2008, 09:52:09 PM
Go to this link and click on link to the right of picture by the article

http://pauwenwitteman.vara.nl/uitzending.php?id=274

There is a problem with the link posted on sm I think.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: robots on January 12, 2008, 09:53:52 PM
Anita has gained more weight


Paulus is 100 percent the manin the video at the casino

maybe Peter should have asked him that


ohhhhhhh thats right
we already knew that  :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 12, 2008, 09:55:21 PM
When you go to the last picture of the set (of Joran throwing the wine) and enlarge it, I don't think the host is smiling-there is a background that makes it look like that.

I watched some of the video, and it is VERY interesting to watch the family VDS.  The body language is very telling.  I swear there are times Joran is thinking "oh Anita, shut up".   At one point Anita looks at Paul while Joran is talking, as if she was watching his reaction to what Joran said.  Joran just widens his  eyes blinks and smiles like he is oh so innocent.  The only person he is fooling is his mother.

The body language and expressions are very interesting. Peter stares them down eye to eye and Joran and Paul look right back with nasty looks. Not much standing in the Van Der Sloots way now a days in holland except this guy..Peter De Vries certainly looks like he is one person who thinks the sloots are FOS.

There is one point where Anita is talking and they zoom on Joran's face and
he looks like....oh, I have got her right where I want her.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 12, 2008, 09:55:53 PM
Still can't really watch the video, keeps buffering and I don't have an RSS thing to click on  :wink:  I was able to sit through it long enough for a couple of screen captures:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/Sloot1.jpg)
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/sloot2.jpg)
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/sloot3.jpg)
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/Sloot4.jpg)



******* - I use a program called "PrintKey", I've been using it since 1999 and love it.  Ask San, it works great she's using it now too.

http://www.printkey-pro.com/index.htm


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 12, 2008, 09:57:26 PM
Go to this link and click on link to the right of picture by the article

http://pauwenwitteman.vara.nl/uitzending.php?id=274

There is a problem with the link posted on sm I think.

Nope, that's the same link I'm using. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: San on January 12, 2008, 09:59:58 PM
XTC can and does become highly addictive to the user and it is said that it is even harder to kick the XTC habit than cocaine or nicotine.  Along with these drugs that offer delusions of grandeur, come inhibitions and deviant sexual proclivities.  Not saying Joran is living that way, but it is something for one to contemplate.

Well if you aren't saying Joran isn't living that way I will  :wink:.  Joran is into drugs big time.  He looks like a dirty ball.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: San on January 12, 2008, 10:02:35 PM
Still can't really watch the video, keeps buffering and I don't have an RSS thing to click on  :wink:  I was able to sit through it long enough for a couple of screen captures:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/Sloot1.jpg)
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/sloot2.jpg)
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/sloot3.jpg)
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/Sloot4.jpg)



******* - I use a program called "PrintKey", I've been using it since 1999 and love it.  Ask San, it works great she's using it now too.

http://www.printkey-pro.com/index.htm

I love using PrintKey.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: crazybabyborg on January 12, 2008, 10:03:08 PM
I'm almost speechless at this incident in the studio. We're getting a very candid inside glimpse of Joran that he could not excercise control over, even in a venue where the eyes of the world are trained on him.

Joran seems to take a quick visual sweep and then leans over, arm extending across the table toward DeVries, and slings the liquid hard enough to make quite a splash at close range directly in his face. Without the next frames, it's hard to conclude much further, but Joran doesn't release DeVries from his stare; he is intent on watching the damage he's inflicted. Look at Paulus; he has no idea from beginning to the end of the frames what has occurred, and it hasn't registered yet with Anita either, IMO. If this was pre-planned, it was only in Joran's mind, IMO.

And what he WANTED to do superceeded everything else. Joran had no ability to follow the pre-set purpose of the family appearing on the show. You know they did it to improve perceptions that they covered up a crime that brought harm not only to Natalee, but to the entire island. You know they discussed it and had an objective they wanted to further by doing it. Joran couldn't control his anger or violent impulsiveness to get through one interview, even with his family flanking him. To Hell with their reputations, to Hell with the cameras, to Hell with respect for elders or those in authority, to Hell with the cameras..............Joran was angry and that's enough to overide anything else.

Joran had his buttons pushed, and he was angry and that was enough to impulsively react and obliterate any common sense or decency.

Joran had his buttons pushed, and he was angry and that was enough to impulsively react and obliterate any common sense or decency.

It's not the first time. It won't be the last.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 12, 2008, 10:03:14 PM
http://player.omroep.nl/?aflID=6213320


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 12, 2008, 10:05:39 PM
And I forgot to say:  That DEFINATELY is Paulus on the casino video.....  Did he change what arm he wears his watch on, or has  it always been left?

sirensong ... I agree!  The first though when I saw the photo of Joran and Paulus ... "PAULUS!"  "THE CASINO VIDEO RECORDING!"

Janet

+++++++++

Jossy Mansur
Dana Pretzer Show
December 14, 2006


DANA: When you look at this case, a question keeps coming up. I am looking at the picture on my PC. It is the alleged picture of a person in the casino with Natalee that looks a lot like Paul. Has there been any update on this issue?

JOSSY: There have not been any change of opinion. People, including people in the casino say that is Paul.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Observer on January 12, 2008, 10:07:32 PM

Thanks girls,I am not on my mac so these are all new to me..I was using 2 screen grab programs and neither would capture the video for some reason IE or Safari.

I like the beginning part of the vid when peter stares down both Joran and Paul  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 12, 2008, 10:08:21 PM
I loved the part where the video of Beth pops up asking Joran that all she wants to know is where did he place Natalee after he was thru raping her!!!!!!!!!

Towards the end Joran almost is in tears and is red in the face.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: crazybabyborg on January 12, 2008, 10:08:32 PM
What does PrintKey do? Does it allow you to freeze a frame from a video?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 12, 2008, 10:09:19 PM
Did the last link play?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 12, 2008, 10:09:31 PM
http://player.omroep.nl/?aflID=6213320

Nope, still buffering.  Don't worry about it, it's ok.  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Observer on January 12, 2008, 10:09:44 PM
And I forgot to say:  That DEFINATELY is Paulus on the casino video.....  Did he change what arm he wears his watch on, or has  it always been left?

sirensong ... I agree!  The first though when I saw the photo of Joran and Paulus ... "PAULUS!"  "THE CASINO VIDEO RECORDING!"

Janet

+++++++++

Jossy Mansur
Dana Pretzer Show
December 14, 2006


DANA: When you look at this case, a question keeps coming up. I am looking at the picture on my PC. It is the alleged picture of a person in the casino with Natalee that looks a lot like Paul. Has there been any update on this issue?

JOSSY: There have not been any change of opinion. People, including people in the casino say that is Paul.

I posted images of who we think is paul in the casino on that dutch board..I wonder what they thought of it?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: wreck on January 12, 2008, 10:10:33 PM
Nice look to go national TV to present your most positive appearance to the world, Joran! :roll:

He looks like a Charles Manson starter kit.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 12, 2008, 10:10:55 PM
http://player.omroep.nl/?aflID=6213320

Nope, still buffering.  Don't worry about it, it's ok.  :wink:

You might try emptying your cache


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 12, 2008, 10:11:00 PM
What does PrintKey do? Does it allow you to freeze a frame from a video?

Well almost all videos allow you to STOP them then RESUME.  What printkey does is allow you to take screen captures of anything, including videos when you stop them. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 12, 2008, 10:11:42 PM
http://player.omroep.nl/?aflID=6213320

Nope, still buffering.  Don't worry about it, it's ok.  :wink:

You might try emptying your cache

It is good viewing even in Dutch


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: wreck on January 12, 2008, 10:16:02 PM
This is fantastic screen capture software:
http://www.aplusfreeware.com/categories/mmedia/FastStoneCapture.html

"Faststone Capture"


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 12, 2008, 10:18:19 PM
It is as if he is slowly being tortured as he realizes where this is headed and then it slowly progresses there. Not near as bad as he did to Natalee but the best we have so far


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 12, 2008, 10:19:34 PM
And I forgot to say:  That DEFINATELY is Paulus on the casino video.....  Did he change what arm he wears his watch on, or has  it always been left?

sirensong ... I agree!  The first though when I saw the photo of Joran and Paulus ... "PAULUS!"  "THE CASINO VIDEO RECORDING!"

Janet

+++++++++

Jossy Mansur
Dana Pretzer Show
December 14, 2006


DANA: When you look at this case, a question keeps coming up. I am looking at the picture on my PC. It is the alleged picture of a person in the casino with Natalee that looks a lot like Paul. Has there been any update on this issue?

JOSSY: There have not been any change of opinion. People, including people in the casino say that is Paul.

I posted images of who we think is paul in the casino on that dutch board..I wonder what they thought of it?

 :shock:

*******

What is the link?

Thanks

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Observer on January 12, 2008, 10:24:32 PM
And I forgot to say:  That DEFINATELY is Paulus on the casino video.....  Did he change what arm he wears his watch on, or has  it always been left?

I posted images of who we think is paul in the casino on that dutch board..I wonder what they thought of it?

 :shock:

*******

What is the link?

Thanks

Janet

http://pauwenwitteman.vara.nl/uitzending.php?id=274

Wreck:Fastone works great but my trial ran out so now I have to buy it for 20 bucks :(


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: crazybabyborg on January 12, 2008, 10:26:31 PM
Nice look to go national TV to present your most positive appearance to the world, Joran! :roll:

He looks like a Charles Manson starter kit.

(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/express/lolololol.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: wreck on January 12, 2008, 10:29:50 PM
And I forgot to say:  That DEFINATELY is Paulus on the casino video.....  Did he change what arm he wears his watch on, or has  it always been left?

I posted images of who we think is paul in the casino on that dutch board..I wonder what they thought of it?

 :shock:

*******

What is the link?

Thanks

Janet

http://pauwenwitteman.vara.nl/uitzending.php?id=274

Wreck:Fastone works great but my trial ran out so now I have to buy it for 20 bucks :(
The link I gave is for version 5.3 (still a completely free version)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Buckeye on January 12, 2008, 10:30:04 PM
I don't believe any of them are feeling tortured.  They are mad and in coverup mode.  They would have us believe that they believed the HI story until Joran changed it when arrested...or until Freddy spilled the beans.  Anita in a Libelle interview mentioned Paulus calling her, in Holland worried that Joran was the last with the girl.  Now this:

Witt.: Have you ever thought that maybe an accident had happened because…

Anita: Yes that indeed I’ve thought for a moment… Because… Joran leaving a girl behind at the beach… That’s impossible because we allways say: Walk up with a girl when you lead her out by the door… So we didn’t bring him up like that and I then was furious at him, both of us were. So for a short while I thought that something could have happened…

Witt.: With alcohol and drugs maybe? …

Anita: Maybe. Well… With drugs… no… But alcohol… Those doubts were there for a while when I was in Holland but there I thought that the girl would soon show up again. But after three days it all became very worrying.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 12, 2008, 10:30:41 PM
And I forgot to say:  That DEFINATELY is Paulus on the casino video.....  Did he change what arm he wears his watch on, or has  it always been left?

I posted images of who we think is paul in the casino on that dutch board..I wonder what they thought of it?

 :shock:

*******

What is the link?

Thanks

Janet

http://pauwenwitteman.vara.nl/uitzending.php?id=274

Wreck:Fastone works great but my trial ran out so now I have to buy it for 20 bucks :(

******* ... what page?

Thanks

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: robots on January 12, 2008, 10:32:00 PM
joran has a gambling problem
to me it is OBVIOUS

he steals and wheels and deals to get money to feed his addiction

the taking of Natalee was about raping her AND stealing whatever money she might have had and whatever money they thought they could get from her..

joran steals money and tries to steal souls

he is the devil


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 12, 2008, 10:32:47 PM
I don't believe any of them are feeling tortured.  They are mad and in coverup mode.  They would have us believe that they believed the HI story until Joran changed it when arrested...or until Freddy spilled the beans.  Anita in a Libelle interview mentioned Paulus calling her, in Holland worried that Joran was the last with the girl.  Now this:

Witt.: Have you ever thought that maybe an accident had happened because…

Anita: Yes that indeed I’ve thought for a moment… Because… Joran leaving a girl behind at the beach… That’s impossible because we allways say: Walk up with a girl when you lead her out by the door… So we didn’t bring him up like that and I then was furious at him, both of us were. So for a short while I thought that something could have happened…

Witt.: With alcohol and drugs maybe? …

Anita: Maybe. Well… With drugs… no… But alcohol… Those doubts were there for a while when I was in Holland but there I thought that the girl would soon show up again. But after three days it all became very worrying.


GREAT CATCH BUCKEYE!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: MuffyBee on January 12, 2008, 10:33:58 PM
Maybe Joran is wearing the hat because he thinks it make him appear less Frankenstein-like.  He DOES have a prominent forehead.  Or maybe he is losing his hair? 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: robots on January 12, 2008, 10:34:36 PM
the player with the dice on his hat



 :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Observer on January 12, 2008, 10:37:12 PM
And I forgot to say:  That DEFINATELY is Paulus on the casino video.....  Did he change what arm he wears his watch on, or has  it always been left?

I posted images of who we think is paul in the casino on that dutch board..I wonder what they thought of it?

 :shock:

*******

What is the link?

Thanks

Janet

Janet

I just posted it again on page 1 and posted it earlier on like page 23 or something. I had to post a link because pics you cant post on that chat,so they will have to copy and paste to see the pics.

Another good thing to post is what diario reported when Paul was denied his money. That he told people,was on wire tap and witnesses that said he picked Natalee and Joran up at 4am and had two contacts with Natalee before she dissapeared. I have yet to see any reporter ask Paul about that.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Buckeye on January 12, 2008, 10:38:59 PM
Maybe Joran is wearing the hat because he thinks it make him appear less Frankenstein-like.  He DOES have a prominent forehead.  Or maybe he is losing his hair? 

There were some, not so subtle hints, that his new look was quite Canadian and that he would be playing hockey soon.  I got the impression they wanted to start rumors of him going to Canada.  :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: San on January 12, 2008, 10:41:45 PM
I don't believe any of them are feeling tortured.  They are mad and in coverup mode.  They would have us believe that they believed the HI story until Joran changed it when arrested...or until Freddy spilled the beans.  Anita in a Libelle interview mentioned Paulus calling her, in Holland worried that Joran was the last with the girl.  Now this:

Witt.: Have you ever thought that maybe an accident had happened because…

Anita: Yes that indeed I’ve thought for a moment… Because… Joran leaving a girl behind at the beach… That’s impossible because we allways say: Walk up with a girl when you lead her out by the door… So we didn’t bring him up like that and I then was furious at him, both of us were. So for a short while I thought that something could have happened…

Witt.: With alcohol and drugs maybe? …

Anita: Maybe. Well… With drugs… no… But alcohol… Those doubts were there for a while when I was in Holland but there I thought that the girl would soon show up again. But after three days it all became very worrying.


I agree Buckeye.  They are not tortured and Joran is not losing one night of sleep over this.  The reason why Joran would be a little tortured is because everyone is watching all his moves and they know he is a rapist murderer.  This is not allowing him to continue his lifestyle as he would like to.  Which would be drugging, kidnapping and raping tourists.  That itself is torturing Joran.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 12, 2008, 10:41:47 PM
Was able to get it to play a little better but it's still "choppy".  Anway, here's a shot of Joran when he's getting mad at DeVries about something:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/Joranmad.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 12, 2008, 10:41:51 PM
Maybe Joran is wearing the hat because he thinks it make him appear less Frankenstein-like.  He DOES have a prominent forehead.  Or maybe he is losing his hair? 

There were some, not so subtle hints, that his new look was quite Canadian and that he would be playing hockey soon.  I got the impression they wanted to start rumors of him going to Canada.  :roll:

 :shock:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: robots on January 12, 2008, 10:41:59 PM
playing hockey...

what a perfect way for someone to knock him on his ass  :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 12, 2008, 10:42:45 PM
They are either complete idiots for going on the show or they were paid a lot of money


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: memphis on January 12, 2008, 10:43:13 PM
I'm almost speechless at this incident in the studio. We're getting a very candid inside glimpse of Joran that he could not excercise control over, even in a venue where the eyes of the world are trained on him.

Joran seems to take a quick visual sweep and then leans over, arm extending across the table toward DeVries, and slings the liquid hard enough to make quite a splash at close range directly in his face. Without the next frames, it's hard to conclude much further, but Joran doesn't release DeVries from his stare; he is intent on watching the damage he's inflicted. Look at Paulus; he has no idea from beginning to the end of the frames what has occurred, and it hasn't registered yet with Anita either, IMO. If this was pre-planned, it was only in Joran's mind, IMO.

And what he WANTED to do superceeded everything else. Joran had no ability to follow the pre-set purpose of the family appearing on the show. You know they did it to improve perceptions that they covered up a crime that brought harm not only to Natalee, but to the entire island. You know they discussed it and had an objective they wanted to further by doing it. Joran couldn't control his anger or violent impulsiveness to get through one interview, even with his family flanking him. To Hell with their reputations, to Hell with the cameras, to Hell with respect for elders or those in authority, to Hell with the cameras..............Joran was angry and that's enough to overide anything else.

Joran had his buttons pushed, and he was angry and that was enough to impulsively react and obliterate any common sense or decency.

Joran had his buttons pushed, and he was angry and that was enough to impulsively react and obliterate any common sense or decency.

It's not the first time. It won't be the last.

Well said CBB, and I agree 100%.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 12, 2008, 10:44:35 PM
I don't believe any of them are feeling tortured.  They are mad and in coverup mode.  They would have us believe that they believed the HI story until Joran changed it when arrested...or until Freddy spilled the beans.  Anita in a Libelle interview mentioned Paulus calling her, in Holland worried that Joran was the last with the girl.  Now this:

Witt.: Have you ever thought that maybe an accident had happened because…

Anita: Yes that indeed I’ve thought for a moment… Because… Joran leaving a girl behind at the beach… That’s impossible because we allways say: Walk up with a girl when you lead her out by the door… So we didn’t bring him up like that and I then was furious at him, both of us were. So for a short while I thought that something could have happened…

Witt.: With alcohol and drugs maybe? …

Anita: Maybe. Well… With drugs… no… But alcohol… Those doubts were there for a while when I was in Holland but there I thought that the girl would soon show up again. But after three days it all became very worrying.


As Beth would say ... "This is huge, Greta!"

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: robots on January 12, 2008, 10:44:44 PM
They are either complete idiots for going on the show or they were paid a lot of money

complete idiots - is a given

so they must have been paid
 :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: hotping on January 12, 2008, 10:48:57 PM
playing hockey...

what a perfect way for someone to knock him on his ass  :cool:
Good One Robots! LOL!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 12, 2008, 10:50:47 PM
Watching all of you dissecting their every word and video clip of this video validates my thought that Beth has a mighty band of supporters. Amazing!!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 12, 2008, 10:53:46 PM
playing hockey...

what a perfect way for someone to knock him on his ass  :cool:
Good One Robots! LOL!!!

... but ... but ... NOT CANADA!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 12, 2008, 10:58:07 PM
Was able to get it to play a little better but it's still "choppy".  Anway, here's a shot of Joran when he's getting mad at DeVries about something:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/Joranmad.jpg)

He has a PIG nose.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 12, 2008, 10:58:42 PM
Warriors is a more apt description.

Joran doesn't have a chance and I predict that he is going to brought to his knees by public opinion, suffering a far worse fate than if he just told the truth.

Anita, can you not see the writing on the wall? I know you love him, so what in the hell are you waiting on? He needs your help, you need to do the right thing, not for just for Beth, but for Joran.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: robots on January 12, 2008, 10:59:04 PM
playing hockey...

what a perfect way for someone to knock him on his ass  :cool:
Good One Robots! LOL!!!
:wink: :wink: :wink: :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: memphis on January 12, 2008, 11:00:39 PM
Thanks for finding and posting the video, translations and pictures. That was some great entertaining. ;) Who'd a thought that Joran would show the world who he really was.  :lol:

Some things I noticed/thought about while watching the video....

Paulus drank all of his wine before the halfway mark of the interview. Everyone else barely touched theirs, except the host on the left.

Paulus sat stooped, with elbows on the table just like he did in the casino video. He sat like that the entire time. He even drank his wine just like he did in the casino video.  :roll:

I wonder if Paulus put antiperspirant all over his face? Seemed like his head was getting damp, but where was his sweat? Maybe part of the agreement was for the studio to be cold.

I too very much enjoyed PRDV's steely stairs. Too funny. He thinks as much of the VDS's as we do.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 12, 2008, 11:05:22 PM
I was just at a website looking at the HURLEY clothing line and noticed a Hurley hat much more suited to Joran's pimp'n lifestyle: :lol:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/JoranPimpHat.jpg)

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/rolleyesvj0.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 12, 2008, 11:08:40 PM
(http://img214.imageshack.us/img214/1628/neverwearawatchbc0.jpg)
LOOKS like a watch he is wearing to me


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: sirensong on January 12, 2008, 11:10:51 PM
I don't believe any of them are feeling tortured.  They are mad and in coverup mode.  They would have us believe that they believed the HI story until Joran changed it when arrested...or until Freddy spilled the beans.  Anita in a Libelle interview mentioned Paulus calling her, in Holland worried that Joran was the last with the girl.  Now this:

Witt.: Have you ever thought that maybe an accident had happened because…

Anita: Yes that indeed I’ve thought for a moment… Because… Joran leaving a girl behind at the beach… That’s impossible because we allways say: Walk up with a girl when you lead her out by the door… So we didn’t bring him up like that and I then was furious at him, both of us were. So for a short while I thought that something could have happened…

Witt.: With alcohol and drugs maybe? …

Anita: Maybe. Well… With drugs… no… But alcohol… Those doubts were there for a while when I was in Holland but there I thought that the girl would soon show up again. But after three days it all became very worrying.




Yes, great catch Buckeye!  You should post it in the comments section of the P&W website.  Or better yet, DeVries site.  Anita is too much.  She is so afraid they didn't investigate Natalee and her family, when it was her sporter doing all the lying, drinking and gambling underage.  Did you notice how Paulus spoke up about Natalee's "profile"?  Again, here is a person living on Aruba that thinks every female tourist has a background that could be blamed for getting herself into trouble.  Let's say it together Robots!  "I HATE THEM ALL"


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 12, 2008, 11:11:47 PM
I can't believe that Anita and Paulus let Joran go on the show
looking like he did.  He looked nasty.
It just made him look more like a preditor. Anita and Paulus
had at least cleaned up.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Anna on January 12, 2008, 11:12:23 PM
I think Joran the sociopath per FBI enjoys the notoriety.  And I do hope his parents feel like the utter fools he made of them with that stunt at the end of the interview. 

They were trying so hard to feign normalcy and he blew it big time for them.

Joran is the product of their rearing which evidently was also supported by a society that says nothing is wrong.  Prostitution and pornography are both legal.  Gambling is not only legal but major local industry.  Under-aged gambling and drinking are also condoned.  One in five of the island inhabitants uses cocaine per our DOJ stats.  Remove the elderly and children and that's a lot of the adult population.

With these two enablers for parents and that societal background, I doubt Joran could feel guilt if he tried, not that he is going to do that.  And Anita lying for him like that with the whole world watching, just disgusting and totally dysfunctional.

I think they have all created a real monster who thinks he can do no wrong and is entitled to do just anything at all that he wants to do.  Sloots have no control over him and he doesn't care one bit if he makes them look like total fools before the whole world.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 12, 2008, 11:14:07 PM
I think Joran the sociopath per FBI enjoys the notoriety.  And I do hope his parents feel like the utter fools he made of them with that stunt at the end of the interview. 

They were trying so hard to feign normalcy and he blew it big time for them.

Joran is the product of their rearing which evidently was also supported by a society that says nothing is wrong.  Prostitution and pornography are both legal.  Gambling is not only legal but major local industry.  Under-aged gambling and drinking are also condoned.  One in five of the island inhabitants uses cocaine per our DOJ stats.  Remove the elderly and children and that's a lot of the adult population.

With these two enablers for parents and that societal background, I doubt Joran could feel guilt if he tried, not that he is going to do that.  And Anita lying for him like that with the whole world watching, just disgusting and totally dysfunctional.

I think they have all created a real monster who thinks he can do no wrong and is entitled to do just anything at all that he wants to do.  Sloots have no control over him and he doesn't care one bit if he makes them look like total fools before the whole world.

Yep, I agree 100%


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 12, 2008, 11:15:18 PM

(http://i22.photobucket.com/albums/b315/FaithMS/2sl.jpg)

SAME WATCH PAULUS WORE IN CASINO SITTING NEXT TO NATALEE


(http://img159.imageshack.us/img159/2285/image344pk8.jpg)

PAULUS NEW WATCH

(http://img214.imageshack.us/img214/1628/neverwearawatchbc0.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Anna on January 12, 2008, 11:15:59 PM
I was concerned for a second that Anita was going to snatch that photo Joran had photoshopped of himself with Natalee right away and maybe tear it to shreds.

Also wondered could she not have seen it before?  She became very agitated when deVries had that photo right beside her for some reason.

Perhaps it's because there is no explanation for it other than a sick one.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: memphis on January 12, 2008, 11:16:24 PM
I can't believe that Anita and Paulus let Joran go on the show
looking like he did.  He looked nasty.
It just made him look more like a preditor. Anita and Paulus
had at least cleaned up.

I wondered the same thing.
Plus, Paulus and Anita were very well rehearsed. They modulated their voices (especially Anita) and reactions. They didn't quite hold up as well when things started getting heated, though.

Once again, I suspect Joran did what he wanted to do, and appeared as he wanted to appear, regardless of how he may have been advised.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 12, 2008, 11:16:46 PM
Was able to get it to play a little better but it's still "choppy".  Anway, here's a shot of Joran when he's getting mad at DeVries about something:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/Joranmad.jpg)

http://www.hurley.com/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: crazybabyborg on January 12, 2008, 11:19:35 PM
Remember the Greta interview? Greta said she was absolutely certain of one thing; Joran's parents tried hard to keep him from doing it at all. They haven't had control of him in a long, long time.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 12, 2008, 11:20:15 PM
I don't believe any of them are feeling tortured.  They are mad and in coverup mode.  They would have us believe that they believed the HI story until Joran changed it when arrested...or until Freddy spilled the beans.  Anita in a Libelle interview mentioned Paulus calling her, in Holland worried that Joran was the last with the girl.  Now this:

Witt.: Have you ever thought that maybe an accident had happened because…

Anita: Yes that indeed I’ve thought for a moment… Because… Joran leaving a girl behind at the beach… That’s impossible because we allways say: Walk up with a girl when you lead her out by the door… So we didn’t bring him up like that and I then was furious at him, both of us were. So for a short while I thought that something could have happened…

Witt.: With alcohol and drugs maybe? …

Anita: Maybe. Well… With drugs… no… But alcohol… Those doubts were there for a while when I was in Holland but there I thought that the girl would soon show up again. But after three days it all became very worrying.




Yes, great catch Buckeye!  You should post it in the comments section of the P&W website.  Or better yet, DeVries site.  Anita is too much.  She is so afraid they didn't investigate Natalee and her family, when it was her sporter doing all the lying, drinking and gambling underage.  Did you notice how Paulus spoke up about Natalee's "profile"?  Again, here is a person living on Aruba that thinks every female tourist has a background that could be blamed for getting herself into trouble.  Let's say it together Robots!  "I HATE THEM ALL"


ANITA VAN DER SLOOT: He's very quiet. He's very shy. He doesn't like media coverage at all. And he's very much hurt by things that are happening. And as I look back — I mean, I came back from Holland Wednesday, and I was so surprised at seeing three young men — one kid, two men — involved, maybe, in the disappearance of a girl. Why did they let the boys go? Why didn't they interrogate immediately deep, see wherever any...

VAN SUSTEREN: Including your son?

ANITA VAN DER SLOOT: Including my son, yes. He should have been held. He should have been interrogated from the beginning on.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: San on January 12, 2008, 11:23:18 PM
I think Joran the sociopath per FBI enjoys the notoriety.  And I do hope his parents feel like the utter fools he made of them with that stunt at the end of the interview. 

They were trying so hard to feign normalcy and he blew it big time for them.

Joran is the product of their rearing which evidently was also supported by a society that says nothing is wrong.  Prostitution and pornography are both legal.  Gambling is not only legal but major local industry.  Under-aged gambling and drinking are also condoned.  One in five of the island inhabitants uses cocaine per our DOJ stats.  Remove the elderly and children and that's a lot of the adult population.

With these two enablers for parents and that societal background, I doubt Joran could feel guilt if he tried, not that he is going to do that.  And Anita lying for him like that with the whole world watching, just disgusting and totally dysfunctional.

I think they have all created a real monster who thinks he can do no wrong and is entitled to do just anything at all that he wants to do.  Sloots have no control over him and he doesn't care one bit if he makes them look like total fools before the whole world.


I agree Anna.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Anna on January 12, 2008, 11:25:32 PM
"This says something about Joran, of course," De Vries said in an interview with NOS radio broadcast Saturday.

"He doesn't have complete control over his behavior."

Show host Paul Witteman said Joran's action was "incomprehensible and incredibly stupid" because they undermine his credibility.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,322388,00.html


Oh, goody!  Fox picked up on the real story, the one where Joran shows the whole world his respect for others and self control.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tylergal on January 12, 2008, 11:27:10 PM
Paulus was obviously drinking to subdue himself.  He did not want to upstage the controlling fishwife.

But, Anita was very condescending in her demeanor, a real yenta. 

I expected her to call out to the Monkeys at any moment, daring the proletariat poltroons of little worth, the hunt-and-peckers of lowbrow verbiage to question the narcisstic charm and low bigotry of the Duke of Aruba!  Her starry-eyed approval of her wonderboy shown through like the brilliant white bras beneath the gauzy chocolate blouse.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 12, 2008, 11:30:09 PM
"This says something about Joran, of course," De Vries said in an interview with NOS radio broadcast Saturday.

"He doesn't have complete control over his behavior."

Show host Paul Witteman said Joran's action was "incomprehensible and incredibly stupid" because they undermine his credibility.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,322388,00.html


Oh, goody!  Fox picked up on the real story, the one where Joran shows the whole world his respect for others and self control.

.

Wow, thanks for seeing that Anna!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: crazybabyborg on January 12, 2008, 11:30:41 PM
Paulus was obviously drinking to subdue himself.  He did not want to upstage the controlling fishwife.

But, Anita was very condescending in her demeanor, a real yenta. 

I expected her to call out to the Monkeys at any moment, daring the proletariat poltroons of little worth, the hunt-and-peckers of lowbrow verbiage to question the narcisstic charm and low bigotry of the Duke of Aruba!  Her starry-eyed approval of her wonderboy shown through like the brilliant white bras beneath the gauzy chocolate blouse.



WOW! I just love it when Tyler gets her ire up! She just paints a picture with words, doesn't she? I agree 100% Tyler, but couldn't have come close to expressing it so well!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 12, 2008, 11:31:50 PM
ANITA FORGOT THAT JORAN WAS SEEING A SHRINK FOR STEALING, LYING AND HIS UNCONTROLLABLE ANGER PROBLEMS:


 "I was also under treatment of a psychologist. This was because I had taken 50 euro's from my dad and also took money from my mother and I used my brothers mobile phone without asking for permission and after that I had broken the chip from his mobile phone. I also once fought with my brother in Miami" (Joran's book)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 12, 2008, 11:33:08 PM
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,322388,00.html

Former Holloway Suspect Tosses Wine in Face of Reporter on TV Show
Saturday , January 12, 2008

 AMSTERDAM, Netherlands  —

A former suspect in the disappearance of U.S. teenager Natalee Holloway in Aruba threw wine in the face of a crime reporter after they appeared together on a Dutch television program, local media reported.

Joran van der Sloot appeared on the late-night talk show Pauw & Witteman on Friday in what was billed as his last television interview about the case. Aruban prosecutors have said they don't have enough evidence to charge him with a crime, though he remains a "person of interest" in what is now a cold case.

Van der Sloot, who denies any wrongdoing, appeared relaxed throughout the TV appearance, despite remarks from crime reporter Peter R. De Vries challenging his honesty.

At the end of the program Van der Sloot and De Vries had a testy exchange about whether De Vries would apologize if evidence exonerating Van der Sloot came to light.

The live show ended, but NOS radio news reported Saturday that moments later, Van der Sloot threw a glass of wine in De Vries' face.

The incident was captured on the show's cameras and photos taken by members of the studio audience are circulating on Dutch web sites.

"This says something about Joran, of course," De Vries said in an interview with NOS radio broadcast Saturday.

"He doesn't have complete control over his behavior."

Show host Paul Witteman said Joran's action was "incomprehensible and incredibly stupid" because they undermine his credibility.

Holloway went missing May 30, 2005, hours before she was to return home to Mountain Brook, Alabama. She was on the final night of her school graduation trip to the island.

Van der Sloot and two other former suspects, brothers Deepak and Satish Kalpoe, were seen leaving a bar with Holloway on the night of her disappearance.

They were questioned early in the investigation and again late last year before being released. All three deny involvement in Holloway's disappearance.

Prosecutors now say they cannot prove a crime was committed without a body, but that they believe Holloway is dead.

Extensive searches of the island turned up no trace of Holloway, who was 18 at the time of her disappearance.

Authorities in Aruba say the case against the three could be reopened if additional evidence surfaces. But if they were to go to trial now with virtually no hope of guilty verdicts, they would lose the opportunity to try them later if strong evidence emerges.

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/JoranPetertv.gif)



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: memphis on January 12, 2008, 11:34:04 PM
Paulus was obviously drinking to subdue himself.  He did not want to upstage the controlling fishwife.

But, Anita was very condescending in her demeanor, a real yenta. 

I expected her to call out to the Monkeys at any moment, daring the proletariat poltroons of little worth, the hunt-and-peckers of lowbrow verbiage to question the narcisstic charm and low bigotry of the Duke of Aruba!  Her starry-eyed approval of her wonderboy shown through like the brilliant white bras beneath the gauzy chocolate blouse.



Tyler, while watching the interview, I thought about how you have always said that Anita was heavily involved in the internet misimformation campaign, and with RU. Well, after hearing Paulus saying that "the girl" hasn't been investigated, I realized not only Anita, but Paulus has been deeply involved. He touts the party line as well, if not better than Anita.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: crazybabyborg on January 12, 2008, 11:35:42 PM
We haven't heard the last of Joran Van derSloot. If for no other reason than predictable future harm to others, this case NEEDS to be pursued until resolution. Someone out there has their life depending on it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tylergal on January 12, 2008, 11:38:04 PM
Paulus produces, Anita directs this finely veiled play where they have come to believe the world is their stage.  Despite Anita's pious behavior and her pedantry throughout as evidenced by her searching for the correct words as she rolled her eyes upward, leftward and right, her sporter reduced the whole family to pedestrian character, when the curtain fell on the final act.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Anna on January 12, 2008, 11:41:11 PM
Even the slightest bit of alcohol in the eyes is very painful and potentially dangerous.  What if the glass had slipped out of his hand and hit deVries in the eyes as well?

Joran is very brutish and coarse to not realize these things can be serious as can drugging girls when you are a teen-aged dull-normal dolt who has no business doing such things at all.  He fails to appreciate serious harm could be done to another or just doesn't care. 

And Paulus says it is thanks to his buds in the judiciary this "ENDED WELL"???  He thinks this is a good ending just because his devil spawn isn't in jail?  The whole world with the exception of a few equally stupid think Joran is "guilty as hell" and his other two children have to live with that.  The vd Sloot name will forever be associated with drugging and making a girl disappear.

It couldn't be much worse but because Joran is out of jail, Paulus thinks it's all good.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: San on January 12, 2008, 11:43:58 PM
We haven't heard the last of Joran Van derSloot. If for no other reason than predictable future harm to others, this case NEEDS to be pursued until resolution. Someone out there has their life depending on it.

I agree CBB.  He is too dangerous to be walking the streets.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: San on January 12, 2008, 11:46:03 PM
Even the slightest bit of alcohol in the eyes is very painful and potentially dangerous.  What if the glass had slipped out of his hand and hit deVries in the eyes as well?

Joran is very brutish and coarse to not realize these things can be serious as can drugging girls when you are a teen-aged dull-normal dolt who has no business doing such things at all.  He fails to appreciate serious harm could be done to another or just doesn't care. 

And Paulus says it is thanks to his buds in the judiciary this "ENDED WELL"???  He thinks this is a good ending just because his devil spawn isn't in jail?  The whole world with the exception of a few equally stupid think Joran is "guilty as hell" and his other two children have to live with that.  The vd Sloot name will forever be associated with drugging and making a girl disappear.

It couldn't be much worse but because Joran is out of jail, Paulus thinks it's all good.

If the shoe was on the other foot how fast would the Sloots been in court to press charges against DeVries and calling him all kinds of names.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Buckeye on January 12, 2008, 11:46:35 PM
I don't believe any of them are feeling tortured.  They are mad and in coverup mode.  They would have us believe that they believed the HI story until Joran changed it when arrested...or until Freddy spilled the beans.  Anita in a Libelle interview mentioned Paulus calling her, in Holland worried that Joran was the last with the girl.  Now this:

Witt.: Have you ever thought that maybe an accident had happened because…

Anita: Yes that indeed I’ve thought for a moment… Because… Joran leaving a girl behind at the beach… That’s impossible because we allways say: Walk up with a girl when you lead her out by the door… So we didn’t bring him up like that and I then was furious at him, both of us were. So for a short while I thought that something could have happened…

Witt.: With alcohol and drugs maybe? …

Anita: Maybe. Well… With drugs… no… But alcohol… Those doubts were there for a while when I was in Holland but there I thought that the girl would soon show up again. But after three days it all became very worrying.




Yes, great catch Buckeye!  You should post it in the comments section of the P&W website.  Or better yet, DeVries site.  Anita is too much.  She is so afraid they didn't investigate Natalee and her family, when it was her sporter doing all the lying, drinking and gambling underage.  Did you notice how Paulus spoke up about Natalee's "profile"?  Again, here is a person living on Aruba that thinks every female tourist has a background that could be blamed for getting herself into trouble.  Let's say it together Robots!  "I HATE THEM ALL"


ANITA VAN DER SLOOT: He's very quiet. He's very shy. He doesn't like media coverage at all. And he's very much hurt by things that are happening. And as I look back — I mean, I came back from Holland Wednesday, and I was so surprised at seeing three young men — one kid, two men — involved, maybe, in the disappearance of a girl. Why did they let the boys go? Why didn't they interrogate immediately deep, see wherever any...

VAN SUSTEREN: Including your son?

ANITA VAN DER SLOOT: Including my son, yes. He should have been held. He should have been interrogated from the beginning on.



However, CBS has a video (not down) that quotes Anita, in her mean voice regarding the hard hard questioning and this was no longer about a missing girl....this was at the time that Paulus was brought in.  She changed her tune with the above, but I remember the hate and indignity in her voice.  This is a privileged family that is not used to being challenged. They don't care anything about Natalee....or anyone else.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 12, 2008, 11:49:02 PM
Warriors is a more apt description.

Joran doesn't have a chance and I predict that he is going to brought to his knees by public opinion, suffering a far worse fate than if he just told the truth.

Anita, can you not see the writing on the wall? I know you love him, so what in the hell are you waiting on? He needs your help, you need to do the right thing, not for just for Beth, but for Joran.

I agree PI.  Anita does not comprehend that by shielding Joran from taking responsibility for his actions ... she is destroying him and ... that is not love.

Doing right by revealing the truth does not imply there are no consequences but ... a burden will be lifted.  The outcome will ... after a time of healing ... opens wide the doors to where forgiveness and restored relationships are given an opportunity to flourish.

Anita ... do right for the sake of your family and ... the family of Natalee Holloway.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: crazybabyborg on January 12, 2008, 11:51:51 PM
Without trying to "over-analyze" too much, it's obvious that Joran's buttons are pushed by one basic thing: Not getting what he wants.

His idea of that interview was a repeat of Greta's where it ended with Greta thinking he had been falsely accused. This one didn't turn out like he wanted. How dare they twist things to keep that accomplishment from him, and it was DeVries that caused it. Therefore Joran struck out at him.

That little moment of truth in the studio has chilling implications for what happened to Natalee.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tylergal on January 12, 2008, 11:56:30 PM
We haven't heard the last of Joran Van derSloot. If for no other reason than predictable future harm to others, this case NEEDS to be pursued until resolution. Someone out there has their life depending on it.

I agree CBB.  He is too dangerous to be walking the streets.

Unfortunately, this is true.  He definitely has the style of OJ Simpson. His charm and smile belies the Dr. Jekyl and Mr. Hyde, who can quickly turned charming Joran to a wrath-filled ogre.  As he sat  smiling and cooing for his mother, hanging on to every word as if he was listening to a Beethoven symphony, there was a demon just dying to get out. 

He held it as long as he could, his face and ears reddening and his eyes welling up with angry tears that he could no longer tolerate and his well was filled to overflow and the dam broke. 

Fortunately, it was only a glass of wine, but in the case of Natalee, it was a probably a tire tool or his foot.  I can no longer give him the benefit of the doubt.

If his background was checked, one might find displays of similar behavior as far back as his early childhood.  Something triggered his psyche as a child and he has gone to and often lives in a darker place than I want to go.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: crazybabyborg on January 12, 2008, 11:56:48 PM
If the Sloots intended to begin a campaign to restore their good name, they're off to a bad start. I don't believe they'll risk airing their dirty laundry, Joran himself, for a while again.

I hope, Oh, I hope that DeVries takes this very, very personally.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: crazybabyborg on January 13, 2008, 12:02:26 AM
Isn't it interesting that they chose this format to attempt to wash the taint of blood from their family? It would have been far more effective to voluntarily take an FBI administered lie detecter test. I'm not 100% convinced that Joran would fail it. He's a real sociopath, IMO, and I'm not sure how well a lie detector can pick up when someone has no emotional response to a lie that differs from the truth.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: crazybabyborg on January 13, 2008, 12:05:41 AM
I'm dying to see the frames following the wine throw. I want to see DeVries reaction. I want to see Paulus' and Anita's reaction as well.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tylergal on January 13, 2008, 12:06:10 AM
Isn't it interesting that they chose this format to attempt to wash the taint of blood from their family? It would have been far more effective to voluntarily take an FBI administered lie detecter test. I'm not 100% convinced that Joran would fail it. He's a real sociopath, IMO, and I'm not sure how well a lie detector can pick up when someone has no emotional response to a lie that differs from the truth.

I have heard they do not do well with sociopathic behavior, because the subject is better programmed than current technology.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 13, 2008, 12:09:26 AM
Paulus was obviously drinking to subdue himself.  He did not want to upstage the controlling fishwife.

But, Anita was very condescending in her demeanor, a real yenta. 

I expected her to call out to the Monkeys at any moment, daring the proletariat poltroons of little worth, the hunt-and-peckers of lowbrow verbiage to question the narcisstic charm and low bigotry of the Duke of Aruba!  Her starry-eyed approval of her wonderboy shown through like the brilliant white bras beneath the gauzy chocolate blouse.



Tyler, while watching the interview, I thought about how you have always said that Anita was heavily involved in the internet misimformation campaign, and with RU. Well, after hearing Paulus saying that "the girl" hasn't been investigated, I realized not only Anita, but Paulus has been deeply involved. He touts the party line as well, if not better than Anita.

memphis ... my thoughts exactly.  I was reading Anita, Paulus and Joran's words but ... Julia Renfro interviews/post and her troll following came to mind.

Janet

++++++++++++++


WITTEMAN SHOW - DUTCH TELEVISION
January 11, 2008

Paul: What stands out is, there is no profile of the girl, what kind of girl was she, who where her contacts, something very simple, the computer of the girl has never been researched, I nowhere saw the family of the girl has been investigated, her friends.  Where you really have to start the investigation, is with the people closest to the girl, and really after 10 million dollars, that has not happened.

Host + de vries: No, you start with the person who was last seen with that person.  What could have been found if you had started with this?

Anita: We know that people have been seen on the beach.  We know that the electronic swipe card from the hotel has been used, within a time frame she could have walked, we know that the card has been used 3 times.  We know that security guards where in the neighborhood. It looks like she could have used the card, to get into the room.

(De Vries: other people could have used that card)

Joran: her room was on the ground floor.

Anita: You can walk straight from the beach to her room. There are about 7 or 8 statements.  That witnesses have seen her walking.

Host: Someone from a gas station says: I saw Natalee H. the day after she disappeared with an other man, and later the same man came back without the girl.  Has there not been a good investigation?

Paul and Anita both: No.

Paul: There is a video, and people are stating that Natalee is in there, after she disappeared.  We have asked to see the video, but we never saw it.

Anita: The video from the HI, yes.The hall from the HI. The poster we just saw from the missed, (They showed the missing poster on tv),  There are several versions of a poster.  Beth H came with her family to my school. This is 48 hours later, yes.  She was on on the island very quickly, which I would do also, she came inside the school, she brought with her the "kidnapped: poster.  but there is an other poster with "Hootie call big hootie".  Then you think: Oh this girl has run away.  She also hung posters in the school with: kidnapped by Joran vander Sloot, within a very short period of time.  I thought, you can't do this, this is strange.  I had, and still have the feeling that there is more.  Behind all this is a different story, not behind Joran, but on the other side.  I would like to see this investigated.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tylergal on January 13, 2008, 12:10:45 AM
Warriors is a more apt description.

Joran doesn't have a chance and I predict that he is going to brought to his knees by public opinion, suffering a far worse fate than if he just told the truth.

Anita, can you not see the writing on the wall? I know you love him, so what in the hell are you waiting on? He needs your help, you need to do the right thing, not for just for Beth, but for Joran.

I agree PI.  Anita does not comprehend that by shielding Joran from taking responsibility for his actions ... she is destroying him and ... that is not love.

Doing right by revealing the truth does not imply there are no consequences but ... a burden will be lifted.  The outcome will ... after a time of healing ... opens wide the doors to where forgiveness and restored relationships are given an opportunity to flourish.

Anita ... do right for the sake of your family and ... the family of Natalee Holloway.

Janet

Had they done the right thing to begin with, Joran would have probably gotten 10 years, reduced to 3 for his age and good behavior, and there would be only a few months to go and they would be able to sleep forever more peacefully from that day forward. 

They have bought their own prison; they carry it with them like a badge of honor, trying at every venue to erase it as if they talk to enough people long enough, keep on their talking points well enough, it will be eradicated like a bad dream. 

But, it's not a bad dream. It's reality and they have made it their prison which will haunt them as long as they retain their sanity.  It may be Paulus drinks to dampen the memories of a night in a casino long ago where he was instrumental in bringing about the death of a young beautiful girl for which is progeny will bear the burden and wear the scarlet letter.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: dennisintn on January 13, 2008, 12:14:18 AM
I'm dying to see the frames following the wine throw. I want to see DeVries reaction. I want to see Paulus' and Anita's reaction as well.

i want to see jvds running for the door with paulus right behind him.  then we'll get to hear anita explain how it wasn't really jvds' fault and peter asked for it and deserved it, but they're all sorry anyway.
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: crazybabyborg on January 13, 2008, 12:14:32 AM
Right, Tyler. That is something we can all take comfort in: the Sloots are unhappy enough with the position they've been left in to try to change it.

GOOD! Poor substitute for real justice, but GOOD!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tylergal on January 13, 2008, 12:18:59 AM
Anita is not dissimilar to Charles Manson, she lives in her own world, and no one is to object to the yarns and webs she spins.  How dare anyone point a finger at this Camelot family lest something bad fortune befall them or even worse, arubicide.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: texasmom on January 13, 2008, 12:19:57 AM
We haven't heard the last of Joran Van derSloot. If for no other reason than predictable future harm to others, this case NEEDS to be pursued until resolution. Someone out there has their life depending on it.

So true, and remember there are two other darling little "sporters" that are watching the big sporter get away with his crimes and mommy and daddy supporting and protecting him through it all!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: robots on January 13, 2008, 12:21:05 AM
Even the slightest bit of alcohol in the eyes is very painful and potentially dangerous.  What if the glass had slipped out of his hand and hit deVries in the eyes as well?

Joran is very brutish and coarse to not realize these things can be serious as can drugging girls when you are a teen-aged dull-normal dolt who has no business doing such things at all.  He fails to appreciate serious harm could be done to another or just doesn't care. 

And Paulus says it is thanks to his buds in the judiciary this "ENDED WELL"???  He thinks this is a good ending just because his devil spawn isn't in jail?  The whole world with the exception of a few equally stupid think Joran is "guilty as hell" and his other two children have to live with that.  The vd Sloot name will forever be associated with drugging and making a girl disappear.

It couldn't be much worse but because Joran is out of jail, Paulus thinks it's all good.


hi Anna

imagine what joran the killer is capable when NOBODY is around to see it
he did this on NATIONAL TELEVISION

ohhhhhhhh  he has a problem


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 13, 2008, 12:30:32 AM
We haven't heard the last of Joran Van derSloot. If for no other reason than predictable future harm to others, this case NEEDS to be pursued until resolution. Someone out there has their life depending on it.

So true, and remember there are two other darling little "sporters" that are watching the big sporter get away with his crimes and mommy and daddy supporting and protecting him through it all!

... the implication ... of Paulus, Anita and other adults in the Aruban coverup shielding Joran from taking personal responsibility for the negative outcomes of his actions ... are far reaching.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: thecuz on January 13, 2008, 12:38:25 AM
hey monkey friends...long time no see!
CBB....just picked up my valentine avi....thanks a million!! :thumleft:
don't just love it....just gives everybody a little bit of smug validation when good old sporter shows his true colors!!!! :smt045


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 13, 2008, 12:41:44 AM
hey monkey friends...long time no see!
CBB....just picked up my valentine avi....thanks a million!! :thumleft:
don't just love it....just gives everybody a little bit of smug validation when good old sporter shows his true colors!!!! :smt045

YES!  I hope Beth can get some of this stuff to Oprah before she tapes her show.  Would be great if Oprah mentioned Joran's temper on her show and showed the photos of Joran throwing the wine.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: memphis on January 13, 2008, 12:42:16 AM
Paulus was obviously drinking to subdue himself.  He did not want to upstage the controlling fishwife.

But, Anita was very condescending in her demeanor, a real yenta. 

I expected her to call out to the Monkeys at any moment, daring the proletariat poltroons of little worth, the hunt-and-peckers of lowbrow verbiage to question the narcisstic charm and low bigotry of the Duke of Aruba!  Her starry-eyed approval of her wonderboy shown through like the brilliant white bras beneath the gauzy chocolate blouse.



Tyler, while watching the interview, I thought about how you have always said that Anita was heavily involved in the internet mis-information campaign, and with RU. Well, after hearing Paulus saying that "the girl" hasn't been investigated, I realized not only Anita, but Paulus has been deeply involved. He touts the party line as well, if not better than Anita.

memphis ... my thoughts exactly.  I was reading Anita, Paulus and Joran's words but ... Julia Renfro interviews/post and her troll following came to mind.

Janet

++++++++++++++


WITTEMAN SHOW - DUTCH TELEVISION
January 11, 2008

Paul: What stands out is, there is no profile of the girl, what kind of girl was she, who where her contacts, something very simple, the computer of the girl has never been researched, I nowhere saw the family of the girl has been investigated, her friends.  Where you really have to start the investigation, is with the people closest to the girl, and really after 10 million dollars, that has not happened.

Host + de vries: No, you start with the person who was last seen with that person.  What could have been found if you had started with this?

Anita: We know that people have been seen on the beach.  We know that the electronic swipe card from the hotel has been used, within a time frame she could have walked, we know that the card has been used 3 times.  We know that security guards where in the neighborhood. It looks like she could have used the card, to get into the room.

(De Vries: other people could have used that card)

Joran: her room was on the ground floor.

Anita: You can walk straight from the beach to her room. There are about 7 or 8 statements.  That witnesses have seen her walking.

Host: Someone from a gas station says: I saw Natalee H. the day after she disappeared with an other man, and later the same man came back without the girl.  Has there not been a good investigation?

Paul and Anita both: No.

Paul: There is a video, and people are stating that Natalee is in there, after she disappeared.  We have asked to see the video, but we never saw it.

Anita: The video from the HI, yes.The hall from the HI. The poster we just saw from the missed, (They showed the missing poster on tv),  There are several versions of a poster.  Beth H came with her family to my school. This is 48 hours later, yes.  She was on on the island very quickly, which I would do also, she came inside the school, she brought with her the "kidnapped: poster.  but there is an other poster with "Hootie call big hootie".  Then you think: Oh this girl has run away.  She also hung posters in the school with: kidnapped by Joran vander Sloot, within a very short period of time.  I thought, you can't do this, this is strange.  I had, and still have the feeling that there is more.  Behind all this is a different story, not behind Joran, but on the other side.  I would like to see this investigated.

Hi Tamikosmom!
Exactly! Makes me furious to read that.  :-x

PS: I fixed my misspelling of information.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: robots on January 13, 2008, 12:43:07 AM
i hope Beth comes out Blazing on Oprah

she has nothing to lose

dont hold back.......on anything  :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: robots on January 13, 2008, 12:44:21 AM
anita is full of crap

literally


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tylergal on January 13, 2008, 12:45:29 AM
i hope Beth comes out Blazing on Oprah

she has nothing to lose

dont hold back.......on anything  :cool:

What time and network is Oprah?  My DIL is having major surgery that day and I will have grandson but I would like to catch it if there is a moment when I am not preoccupied with golf cart trips, basketball practice, homework, etc.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: thecuz on January 13, 2008, 12:45:32 AM
hey monkey friends...long time no see!
CBB....just picked up my valentine avi....thanks a million!! :thumleft:
don't just love it....just gives everybody a little bit of smug validation when good old sporter shows his true colors!!!! :smt045

YES!  I hope Beth can get some of this stuff to Oprah before she tapes her show.  Would be great if Oprah mentioned Joran's temper on her show and showed the photos of Joran throwing the wine.


she is aware and producers are aware as well...we will see if they have time to incorporate all this into what they already have planned!!!
cannot wait!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 13, 2008, 12:48:15 AM
hey monkey friends...long time no see!
CBB....just picked up my valentine avi....thanks a million!! :thumleft:
don't just love it....just gives everybody a little bit of smug validation when good old sporter shows his true colors!!!! :smt045

YES!  I hope Beth can get some of this stuff to Oprah before she tapes her show.  Would be great if Oprah mentioned Joran's temper on her show and showed the photos of Joran throwing the wine.


she is aware and producers are aware as well...we will see if they have time to incorporate all this into what they already have planned!!!
cannot wait!!!!

Yeah, I'm affraid there won't be enough time!  I'm sure that Beth's segment is just a small segment of the entire show.  Hopefully Oprah can bring some of it up since it's so recent.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 13, 2008, 12:48:32 AM
hey monkey friends...long time no see!
CBB....just picked up my valentine avi....thanks a million!! :thumleft:
don't just love it....just gives everybody a little bit of smug validation when good old sporter shows his true colors!!!! :smt045

We all know Joran's true colors are lurking just beneath the surface...
It is just so lovely to have them erupting on video for all the world to see.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: memphis on January 13, 2008, 12:52:04 AM
hey monkey friends...long time no see!
CBB....just picked up my valentine avi....thanks a million!! :thumleft:
don't just love it....just gives everybody a little bit of smug validation when good old sporter shows his true colors!!!! :smt045

YES!  I hope Beth can get some of this stuff to Oprah before she tapes her show.  Would be great if Oprah mentioned Joran's temper on her show and showed the photos of Joran throwing the wine.


she is aware and producers are aware as well...we will see if they have time to incorporate all this into what they already have planned!!!
cannot wait!!!!

That's great Casa!
Yes, it was a real treat getting to see the real Joran.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 13, 2008, 12:54:14 AM
i hope Beth comes out Blazing on Oprah

she has nothing to lose

dont hold back.......on anything  :cool:

What time and network is Oprah?  My DIL is having major surgery that day and I will have grandson but I would like to catch it if there is a moment when I am not preoccupied with golf cart trips, basketball practice, homework, etc.

In Birmingham it is on ABC 33/40 at 4:00PM


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: memphis on January 13, 2008, 12:54:32 AM
 :shock:

I see shelties in the cage!

 :smt055


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: thecuz on January 13, 2008, 12:54:35 AM
hey monkey friends...long time no see!
CBB....just picked up my valentine avi....thanks a million!! :thumleft:
don't just love it....just gives everybody a little bit of smug validation when good old sporter shows his true colors!!!! :smt045

YES!  I hope Beth can get some of this stuff to Oprah before she tapes her show.  Would be great if Oprah mentioned Joran's temper on her show and showed the photos of Joran throwing the wine.


she is aware and producers are aware as well...we will see if they have time to incorporate all this into what they already have planned!!!
cannot wait!!!!

That's great Casa!
Yes, it was a real treat getting to see the real Joran.


hehe memphis....cuz does not = casa!!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on January 13, 2008, 12:54:36 AM
hey monkey friends...long time no see!
CBB....just picked up my valentine avi....thanks a million!! :thumleft:
don't just love it....just gives everybody a little bit of smug validation when good old sporter shows his true colors!!!! :smt045

YES!  I hope Beth can get some of this stuff to Oprah before she tapes her show.  Would be great if Oprah mentioned Joran's temper on her show and showed the photos of Joran throwing the wine.


she is aware and producers are aware as well...we will see if they have time to incorporate all this into what they already have planned!!!
cannot wait!!!!

 Awesome !!!   :wink:

Tryed to get caught up// gotta get to bed here.
I hope Carpe dont mind me saying this..   He isgonna capture OPRAH    :) :) 
I wil miss it. gotta work.. Busy weks ahead of me .
 HUGS to yah CUZ.. and Hey to all.. CARPE TY   :cool:
 Hope al is well. I gotts go back to bed.. have to get up early.
 I  hope Peter Devries sllaps the shit of out of JVDS for what he did.. made me sick to see the evil prick. 
 Anita needs to wake the "F" up. i wish her and my ex MIL could meet.. the DENIAL sisters............ and PVDS is a big puss.. JORAN .. quit protecting DADDY.   :roll: :roll: :roll:
 Have a great night all.. 
 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: thecuz on January 13, 2008, 12:55:59 AM
i hope Beth comes out Blazing on Oprah

she has nothing to lose

dont hold back.......on anything  :cool:

What time and network is Oprah?  My DIL is having major surgery that day and I will have grandson but I would like to catch it if there is a moment when I am not preoccupied with golf cart trips, basketball practice, homework, etc.

In Birmingham it is on ABC 33/40 at 4:00PM


it is on Channel 7 out of Little Rock at 4pm as well....BUT.....the tower fell down day before yesterday and the channel has been off the air for the last 2 days....i am going to be PISSED if it is not up and running by Wednesday!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: memphis on January 13, 2008, 12:57:06 AM
hey monkey friends...long time no see!
CBB....just picked up my valentine avi....thanks a million!! :thumleft:
don't just love it....just gives everybody a little bit of smug validation when good old sporter shows his true colors!!!! :smt045

YES!  I hope Beth can get some of this stuff to Oprah before she tapes her show.  Would be great if Oprah mentioned Joran's temper on her show and showed the photos of Joran throwing the wine.


she is aware and producers are aware as well...we will see if they have time to incorporate all this into what they already have planned!!!
cannot wait!!!!

That's great Casa!
Yes, it was a real treat getting to see the real Joran.


hehe memphis....cuz does not = casa!!!!!

 :2doh: Don't know why I called you casa. Weird little misfire in my brain.
Sorry thecuz.  :D


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: thecuz on January 13, 2008, 12:57:38 AM
hey monkey friends...long time no see!
CBB....just picked up my valentine avi....thanks a million!! :thumleft:
don't just love it....just gives everybody a little bit of smug validation when good old sporter shows his true colors!!!! :smt045

YES!  I hope Beth can get some of this stuff to Oprah before she tapes her show.  Would be great if Oprah mentioned Joran's temper on her show and showed the photos of Joran throwing the wine.


she is aware and producers are aware as well...we will see if they have time to incorporate all this into what they already have planned!!!
cannot wait!!!!

 Awesome !!!   :wink:

Tryed to get caught up// gotta get to bed here.
I hope Carpe dont mind me saying this..   He isgonna capture OPRAH    :) :) 
I wil miss it. gotta work.. Busy weks ahead of me .
 HUGS to yah CUZ.. and Hey to all.. CARPE TY   :cool:
 Hope al is well. I gotts go back to bed.. have to get up early.
 I  hope Peter Devries sllaps the shit of out of JVDS for what he did.. made me sick to see the evil prick. 
 Anita needs to wake the "F" up. i wish her and my ex MIL could meet.. the DENIAL sisters............ and PVDS is a big puss.. JORAN .. quit protecting DADDY.   :roll: :roll: :roll:
 Have a great night all.. 
 


Hey sweetie....just making a late night pass thru myself!!!
sweet dreams angie....big things are coming for you girl! keep the faith!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on January 13, 2008, 01:07:52 AM
hey monkey friends...long time no see!
CBB....just picked up my valentine avi....thanks a million!! :thumleft:
don't just love it....just gives everybody a little bit of smug validation when good old sporter shows his true colors!!!! :smt045

YES!  I hope Beth can get some of this stuff to Oprah before she tapes her show.  Would be great if Oprah mentioned Joran's temper on her show and showed the photos of Joran throwing the wine.


she is aware and producers are aware as well...we will see if they have time to incorporate all this into what they already have planned!!!
cannot wait!!!!

 Awesome !!!   :wink:

Tryed to get caught up// gotta get to bed here.
I hope Carpe dont mind me saying this..   He isgonna capture OPRAH    :) :) 
I wil miss it. gotta work.. Busy weks ahead of me .
 HUGS to yah CUZ.. and Hey to all.. CARPE TY   :cool:
 Hope al is well. I gotts go back to bed.. have to get up early.
 I  hope Peter Devries sllaps the shit of out of JVDS for what he did.. made me sick to see the evil prick. 
 Anita needs to wake the "F" up. i wish her and my ex MIL could meet.. the DENIAL sisters............ and PVDS is a big puss.. JORAN .. quit protecting DADDY.   :roll: :roll: :roll:
 Have a great night all.. 
 


Hey sweetie....just making a late night pass thru myself!!!
sweet dreams angie....big things are coming for you girl! keep the faith!

 :wink:   And sweet dreams back at yah chicky .  :smt052
 I feel big things wil come for you as well. !
Ok.. bed for sure now..   :roll: :roll: 
 TTYL Cuz..  :)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tylergal on January 13, 2008, 01:12:04 AM
i hope Beth comes out Blazing on Oprah

she has nothing to lose

dont hold back.......on anything  :cool:

What time and network is Oprah?  My DIL is having major surgery that day and I will have grandson but I would like to catch it if there is a moment when I am not preoccupied with golf cart trips, basketball practice, homework, etc.

In Birmingham it is on ABC 33/40 at 4:00PM

Thank you, Magnolia.  I will try to catch it.  I hope I can.  If not, I will be so disappointed.  Maybe DH will record if not.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tylergal on January 13, 2008, 01:18:40 AM
dennisintn, memphis, texasmom, Tamikosmom, MAca, thecuz, Bearlyhere, cp405, Kat_Gram, hotping, Chata, Susebear, klaasend, Icehawk

Some favorite monkeys lurking.

I see you lurking.
Why don't you come in.

It's getting late and
I need to turn in.

So stop your lurking and
come on in.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: thecuz on January 13, 2008, 01:23:18 AM
dennisintn, memphis, texasmom, Tamikosmom, MAca, thecuz, Bearlyhere, cp405, Kat_Gram, hotping, Chata, Susebear, klaasend, Icehawk

Some favorite monkeys lurking.


come out, come out, where every you are.....sounds like Glenda the good witch not the "other glenda"

I see you lurking.
Why don't you come in.

It's getting late and
I need to turn in.

So stop your lurking and
come on in.






come out, come out, where every you are.....sounds like Glenda the good witch not the "other glenda" :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: thecuz on January 13, 2008, 01:26:05 AM
well....keeping with the wizard of oz theme...there is no place like home...especially the bed.....it is calling my name!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Observer on January 13, 2008, 01:30:29 AM
LOL@Carpe!!

http://youtube.com/watch?v=Sb28rDTAC0Y


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Kat_Gram on January 13, 2008, 01:40:18 AM
Hi Tyler,
Yes all the world's a stage to the Sloots, except Joran did some improvising that wasn't in Anita's script.
Priceless.
I don't know if the Dutch are as prone to litigation as we are here in NA.
..
Ah, yes, the girl's family must be investigated. They will sing that tune over there forever like a broken record.
It's late, G'Nite.
I am getting another GrandBaby. He He . Labor Day in September. Life is beautiful some moments.
 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 13, 2008, 01:47:26 AM
(http://img80.imageshack.us/img80/2494/joranzi0.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)
(http://img141.imageshack.us/img141/37/joran1jpgsi1.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)


Peter's eyes tell the whole story.  And Joran does look very sick and gaunt.  Aids maybe?  Just doesn't look well at all to me. (MO)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Shell on January 13, 2008, 01:48:58 AM
Anita: We know that people have been seen on the beach.  We know that the electronic swipe card from the hotel has been used, within a time frame she could have walked, we know that the card has been used 3 times.  We know that security guards where in the neighborhood. It looks like she could have used the card, to get into the room.

(What does Anita mean by this? Is she still trying to steer the investigation to the security guards?)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on January 13, 2008, 01:55:58 AM
Anita: We know that people have been seen on the beach.  We know that the electronic swipe card from the hotel has been used, within a time frame she could have walked, we know that the card has been used 3 times.  We know that security guards where in the neighborhood. It looks like she could have used the card, to get into the room.

(What does Anita mean by this? Is she still trying to steer the investigation to the security guards?)

I think she must have missed the memo.  :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Shell on January 13, 2008, 02:01:05 AM
Anita: We know that people have been seen on the beach.  We know that the electronic swipe card from the hotel has been used, within a time frame she could have walked, we know that the card has been used 3 times.  We know that security guards where in the neighborhood. It looks like she could have used the card, to get into the room.

(What does Anita mean by this? Is she still trying to steer the investigation to the security guards?)

I think she must have missed the memo.  :roll:

I am thinking she missed a good number of them.  :-?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: LilPuma on January 13, 2008, 02:02:04 AM
The Oprah shows are taped so they may not be able to include this latest incident.  Maybe someone here knows Beth and can find out if it was already taped.  In my area Oprah comes on in the morning and then is replayed at 11:00 p.m.  Could be the same elsewhere. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Shell on January 13, 2008, 02:06:44 AM
At the end of the video, right after the drink was tossed, Joran's seems to do something odd with his mouth and is he giving a wink at the host of the show? It will be interesting to see more stills.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 13, 2008, 02:07:53 AM
The Oprah shows are taped so they may not be able to include this latest incident.  Maybe someone here knows Beth and can find out if it was already taped.  In my area Oprah comes on in the morning and then is replayed at 11:00 p.m.  Could be the same elsewhere. 

I'm told the show will not be taped until Tuesday, so there's time  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Observer on January 13, 2008, 02:08:11 AM
I can't say much right now but I am in contact with someone who's MOM died in Aruba under very suspicious circumstances as well as another. When this young girl went to retrieve evidence of what happened the cop called in sick both days to work and they went home with nothing.A close friend of her Mom won't even return phone calls even after one year.They were treated terrible and there is so much I want to say and get off my chest but I can't. Except Aruba is far more dangerous than some people think and every bit as evil as what others have said here in this forum.I am pissed off big time and at the same time my heart absolutely aches for this girl. I will refrain from saying too much more so I don't interfere with the answers she is looking for. I really wonder how many have been murdered the last 3 years in Aruba and the crimes covered up?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tylergal on January 13, 2008, 02:09:01 AM
Hi Tyler,
Yes all the world's a stage to the Sloots, except Joran did some improvising that wasn't in Anita's script.
Priceless.
I don't know if the Dutch are as prone to litigation as we are here in NA.
..
Ah, yes, the girl's family must be investigated. They will sing that tune over there forever like a broken record.
It's late, G'Nite.
I am getting another GrandBaby. He He . Labor Day in September. Life is beautiful some moments.
 

Congratulations!  You know I have a labor day weekend baby also.  My baby will be a year when yours gets here.  Aren't they fun!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on January 13, 2008, 02:13:19 AM
The Oprah shows are taped so they may not be able to include this latest incident.  Maybe someone here knows Beth and can find out if it was already taped.  In my area Oprah comes on in the morning and then is replayed at 11:00 p.m.  Could be the same elsewhere. 

I would think she would want to add this latest information.  A picture is worth a thousand words.

If this is what he does when he appears calm. imagine what he could do to a small girl from Birmingham when he was pissed that she said, "No!"

If after this Anita denies he has anger management problems now, who would believe her?  He is his own worst enemy.  I can't imagine what Anita is thinking while she watches her son implode.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 13, 2008, 02:15:12 AM
Anita: We know that people have been seen on the beach.  We know that the electronic swipe card from the hotel has been used, within a time frame she could have walked, we know that the card has been used 3 times.  We know that security guards where in the neighborhood. It looks like she could have used the card, to get into the room.

(What does Anita mean by this? Is she still trying to steer the investigation to the security guards?)


Dispicable!!


Dave Holloway
'Rita Cosby Live & Direct'
April 5, 2006


http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12187266/

DAVE HOLLOWAY, NATALEE‘S FATHER: Well, we need to clear up a little of the smoke and mirrors problem. I provided the police with the documents that they‘re referring to, the hotel keys, as a matter of fact. Beth obtained those immediately upon arriving on the island and then provided me with a copy that I provided to the police.

Joe failed to mention that that same code was used again at 11:02 AM and 11:08 AM prior to them getting on—or leaving to the airport. So key number one, which we feel like Natalee used, was last used at 8:30 PM the prior night. So that key was not used again after the trip was over


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tylergal on January 13, 2008, 02:20:32 AM
I was just at a website looking at the HURLEY clothing line and noticed a Hurley hat much more suited to Joran's pimp'n lifestyle: :lol:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/JoranPimpHat.jpg)

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/rolleyesvj0.gif)

Is he wearing Hurley clothing!?!  Well, that is so pedestrian.  Not even Britney would wear that brand. Its durability will never compare with the wash-and-wear, long-life blue plaid shirt.  T


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on January 13, 2008, 02:20:55 AM
Anita: We know that people have been seen on the beach.  We know that the electronic swipe card from the hotel has been used, within a time frame she could have walked, we know that the card has been used 3 times.  We know that security guards where in the neighborhood. It looks like she could have used the card, to get into the room.

(What does Anita mean by this? Is she still trying to steer the investigation to the security guards?)


Dispicable!!


Dave Holloway
'Rita Cosby Live & Direct'
April 5, 2006


http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12187266/

DAVE HOLLOWAY, NATALEE‘S FATHER: Well, we need to clear up a little of the smoke and mirrors problem. I provided the police with the documents that they‘re referring to, the hotel keys, as a matter of fact. Beth obtained those immediately upon arriving on the island and then provided me with a copy that I provided to the police.

Joe failed to mention that that same code was used again at 11:02 AM and 11:08 AM prior to them getting on—or leaving to the airport. So key number one, which we feel like Natalee used, was last used at 8:30 PM the prior night. So that key was not used again after the trip was over

I thought I remembered that.  Why would Anita say something that could be so easily disregarded?  Because she doesn't have anything of value to say.  She likes to throw spaghetti up against the wall and see what sticks.  I wonder what would stick if we threw Sporter up against the wall?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on January 13, 2008, 02:23:01 AM
I was just at a website looking at the HURLEY clothing line and noticed a Hurley hat much more suited to Joran's pimp'n lifestyle: :lol:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/JoranPimpHat.jpg)

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/rolleyesvj0.gif)

Is he wearing Hurley clothing!?!  Well, that is so pedestrian.  Not even Britney would wear that brand. Its durability will never compare with the wash-and-wear, long-life blue plaid shirt.  T

ROTF!  He looks like J-Fed!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: LilPuma on January 13, 2008, 03:03:55 AM
The Oprah shows are taped so they may not be able to include this latest incident.  Maybe someone here knows Beth and can find out if it was already taped.  In my area Oprah comes on in the morning and then is replayed at 11:00 p.m.  Could be the same elsewhere. 

I'm told the show will not be taped until Tuesday, so there's time  :wink:

I hope they include this then. 

What's with the unshaved unkempt look? 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: texasmom on January 13, 2008, 03:07:22 AM
I can't say much right now but I am in contact with someone who's MOM died in Aruba under very suspicious circumstances as well as another. When this young girl went to retrieve evidence of what happened the cop called in sick both days to work and they went home with nothing.A close friend of her Mom won't even return phone calls even after one year.They were treated terrible and there is so much I want to say and get off my chest but I can't. Except Aruba is far more dangerous than some people think and every bit as evil as what others have said here in this forum.I am pissed off big time and at the same time my heart absolutely aches for this girl. I will refrain from saying too much more so I don't interfere with the answers she is looking for. I really wonder how many have been murdered the last 3 years in Aruba and the crimes covered up?

I agree *******, and please tell your contact that I will keep her in my prayers, He will know who she is....  Natalee's story has "opened the windows" into the "happy little island".  I'm sure we would be shocked to know how long the crimes and injustice has been going on and just how many lives it has taken or affected. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: texasmom on January 13, 2008, 03:11:31 AM
Hi Everyone!  I've been here a while but had about 15 pages to read to catch up.  I wish I could've been here earlier, seems almost everyone has called it a night. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: crazybabyborg on January 13, 2008, 03:24:37 AM
Here's the video. It's in Slow Motion.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_mqdBSFwpyw


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: LilPuma on January 13, 2008, 03:26:37 AM
I just changed into my Valentine outfit.  Thank you CBB. 
 :smt058

Night everyone. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Port Valerie on January 13, 2008, 03:29:11 AM
Nice look to go national TV to present your most positive appearance to the world, Joran! :roll:

He looks like a Charles Manson starter kit.

Very funny. He looks like he's at a poker tournament, using the hat to hide his face.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: crazybabyborg on January 13, 2008, 03:29:25 AM
I just changed into my Valentine outfit.  Thank you CBB. 
 :smt058

Night everyone. 

Nite and you're most welcomed!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: sirensong on January 13, 2008, 03:34:24 AM
dennisintn, memphis, texasmom, Tamikosmom, MAca, thecuz, Bearlyhere, cp405, Kat_Gram, hotping, Chata, Susebear, klaasend, Icehawk

Some favorite monkeys lurking.

I see you lurking.
Why don't you come in.

It's getting late and
I need to turn in.

So stop your lurking and
come on in.



 :2waver:I'm here too!!  How come my name is never seen, even though I am logged on?  :smt102 I must have something set wrong in my profile?
 
Hi Texasmom!  Looks like everyone went to bed!  I am bout ready to do the same.  Been reading all the comments on P&W site.  ******* is doing some great posts over there.  If I wasn't too tired I would go do the same myself.  I always wind up on the board after everyone is gone as I am on PST.   Alot of great posts tonight after the sporter's temper tantrum.  I wish the monkeys could just arrest him and put on the trial.  I do not understand people in Aruba and the NL saying he is innocent, as they couldn't prove guilt without evidence, when they have to know that is what the cover up was all about--NO EVIDENCE!!  The people in NL know Aruba is a  dangerous place.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: wreck on January 13, 2008, 03:34:52 AM
Okay, I usually get in trouble for posting this late on a Saturday night!! But, it just floors me that Aruba/RU/FOB etc. still defend Joran et al. Do they actually think that "getting these guys off" absolves the island???? Most places would be TRYING to pin the blame on anyone simply to get the case to "go away." Here we have the OBVIOUS perps on the run and AHATA is going out of their way to get them off. They think if J2K is cleared -- they "win." -------------------WRONG


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: sirensong on January 13, 2008, 03:35:34 AM
Oh, man-my little wavy guy didn't show up!! :2waver:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Port Valerie on January 13, 2008, 03:38:46 AM
The guy is starting to look scary, not the innocent kid he put himself forth as in the Greta interview. Bet she won't interview him now. At least, she won't give him any liquid refreshment of any kind.

This is not a kid any more. There's really nothing Anita can do now.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: wreck on January 13, 2008, 03:38:55 AM
Also -- a repeat from earlier:
Joran on the Dutch show looks like a Charles Mansion starter kit!!!! :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Port Valerie on January 13, 2008, 03:45:33 AM
Here's the video. It's in Slow Motion.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_mqdBSFwpyw

Unbelievable.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: sirensong on January 13, 2008, 03:52:51 AM
The guy is starting to look scary, not the innocent kid he put himself forth as in the Greta interview. Bet she won't interview him now. At least, she won't give him any liquid refreshment of any kind.

This is not a kid any more. There's really nothing Anita can do now.



I agree, and the video drives that point home, doesn't it?  Wish I could hear what Joran was saying. He really looks diabolical on this video. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: texasmom on January 13, 2008, 03:55:21 AM
dennisintn, memphis, texasmom, Tamikosmom, MAca, thecuz, Bearlyhere, cp405, Kat_Gram, hotping, Chata, Susebear, klaasend, Icehawk

Some favorite monkeys lurking.

I see you lurking.
Why don't you come in.

It's getting late and
I need to turn in.

So stop your lurking and
come on in.



 :2waver:I'm here too!!  How come my name is never seen, even though I am logged on?  :smt102 I must have something set wrong in my profile?
 
Hi Texasmom!  Looks like everyone went to bed!  I am bout ready to do the same.  Been reading all the comments on P&W site.  ******* is doing some great posts over there.  If I wasn't too tired I would go do the same myself.  I always wind up on the board after everyone is gone as I am on PST.   Alot of great posts tonight after the sporter's temper tantrum.  I wish the monkeys could just arrest him and put on the trial.  I do not understand people in Aruba and the NL saying he is innocent, as they couldn't prove guilt without evidence, when they have to know that is what the cover up was all about--NO EVIDENCE!!  The people in NL know Aruba is a  dangerous place.

Hi Sirensong, check out the Oprah message boards when you have time...I will probably call it a night soon too.  It's 3am and my oldest son's 21st birthday today so I have a lot to do, better get some rest.  I'm so glad the sporter showed his true colors for all to see!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: texasmom on January 13, 2008, 04:09:48 AM
Does anyone have the P & W link handy, I've been going back and looking for it but haven't found it yet...and my computer is so slow....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on January 13, 2008, 04:51:14 AM
Does anyone have the P & W link handy, I've been going back and looking for it but haven't found it yet...and my computer is so slow....


http://pauwenwitteman.vara.nl/uitzending.php?id=274[url]] (http://[/url)http://pauwenwitteman.vara.nl/uitzending.php?id=274http://



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on January 13, 2008, 05:01:53 AM
Does anyone have the P & W link handy, I've been going back and looking for it but haven't found it yet...and my computer is so slow....


http://http://pauwenwitteman.vara.nl/uitzending.php?id=274



Then click underneath on 11 januari 2008


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Sue on January 13, 2008, 06:36:40 AM
well looky looky the cocky little shit is at it again
I hope someone takes that little SOB out


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Peaches on January 13, 2008, 07:41:35 AM
Nice look to go national TV to present your most positive appearance to the world, Joran! :roll:

He looks like a Charles Manson starter kit.

I agree.  All he needs now is a swastika on his forehead.

What a loser.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 13, 2008, 07:48:36 AM
Good morning. I see that Joran's audition for Oprah at least earned him another Youtube appearance. That boy has a flare for the stage:)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 13, 2008, 08:09:19 AM
1. How long has it been since Joran took a shower???  :shock: :smt087
2. Doesn't Paulus usually wear his watch on his other wrist? :2thinky:
3. Very rude and disrespectful for Joran not to remove his hat for this show :thumbdown:   :smt018 :smt011

I am having some buffering problems(STILL AM)...will try to watch again later all the way through.
   

BUMP....I posted the above yesterday morning....I noticed the watch immediatly!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 13, 2008, 08:18:02 AM
They are either complete idiots for going on the show or they were paid a lot of money
           


BOTH!!  :wink:

And at the end...after Joran threw the wine, Anita broke out into this song!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=THSL5wO7oAM   :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 13, 2008, 08:33:59 AM
hey monkey friends...long time no see!
CBB....just picked up my valentine avi....thanks a million!! :thumleft:
don't just love it....just gives everybody a little bit of smug validation when good old sporter shows his true colors!!!! :smt045

We all know Joran's true colors are lurking just beneath the surface...
It is just so lovely to have them erupting on video for all the world to see.
     

LOL.....Magnolia, I am getting caught up and just read your post....after I posted the above...lol. INDEED...True Colors!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 13, 2008, 08:42:45 AM
The Oprah shows are taped so they may not be able to include this latest incident.  Maybe someone here knows Beth and can find out if it was already taped.  In my area Oprah comes on in the morning and then is replayed at 11:00 p.m.  Could be the same elsewhere. 

I'm told the show will not be taped until Tuesday, so there's time  :wink:

I hope they include this then. 

What's with the unshaved unkempt look? 
   

I have been thinking a lot about this and I think that when he was released from KIA and had pictures taken while unshaven at release time, that some of his girly groupies told him he looked 'hot' so he decided to keep the 'look'...perhaps even Guido told him he looked 'hot'  :wink:
He's got that George Michael kinda thing goin' on.  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: sharon on January 13, 2008, 08:43:28 AM

Camera can't find a good side for AVDS, it seems.   :P


 :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Good one!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: sharon on January 13, 2008, 08:47:40 AM
I still haven't been able to watch the video, it just keeps buffering.  Wish I could then I'd get more screen captures  :wink:

I watched the whole thing but can only save the screen captures in Opera Browser :( If I could do it in IE then I could capture much better pics and bigger.

(http://img231.imageshack.us/img231/5446/joran2jpghu8.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)


With all these images of Joran and PVDS in the same frame.......I was thinking that we would have seen one with Lorenzo's face added by now (jist so we can look at a comparison of facial features)  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 13, 2008, 08:47:53 AM
They are either complete idiots for going on the show or they were paid a lot of money
           


BOTH!!  :wink:

And at the end...after Joran threw the wine, Anita broke out into this song!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=THSL5wO7oAM   :lol:


Its such a pretty song to associate with Joran though it certainly can be applied to him. Unfortunately, true colors can go either way, just like Joran:)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Dayhiker on January 13, 2008, 08:49:41 AM
Good morning. I see that Joran's audition for Oprah at least earned him another Youtube appearance. That boy has a flare for the stage:)


The NBC Today morning show just just did a segment on Joran van der Sloot's escapade. Showed the video twice. Good, am glad the U.S. viewers are also getting some insight into the angry out-of-control goon.

If he will show such anger on a national television program we can only imagine what he would do alone if a girl refused his advances.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Dayhiker on January 13, 2008, 08:53:00 AM
Good morning. I see that Joran's audition for Oprah at least earned him another Youtube appearance. That boy has a flare for the stage:)


PI, I hope Oprah does discuss this and show the video so Beth can give viewers the lowdown on Joran's anger managment problems.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 13, 2008, 09:16:39 AM
Good morning. I see that Joran's audition for Oprah at least earned him another Youtube appearance. That boy has a flare for the stage:)


PI, I hope Oprah does discuss this and show the video so Beth can give viewers the lowdown on Joran's anger managment problems.

All we can do is hope she finds it newsworthy and that she has the time to incorporate into the show. While throwing water in the face of a co guest on a television show does not make him a killer, it does demonstrate a lack of anger control and common decency. I am amazed that all of those in Aruba who have or are suffering from the boycott still stand by their selection of Joran as the Poster Boy of Aruba and their selection of the Van Der Sloots as the first family of Aruba. That may not be one happy island, but it is certainly one loyal island


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 13, 2008, 09:18:00 AM
Good morning. I see that Joran's audition for Oprah at least earned him another Youtube appearance. That boy has a flare for the stage:)


The NBC Today morning show just just did a segment on Joran van der Sloot's escapade. Showed the video twice. Good, am glad the U.S. viewers are also getting some insight into the angry out-of-control goon.

If he will show such anger on a national television program we can only imagine what he would do alone if a girl refused his advances.


I missed that, what did the commentators have to say about it?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 13, 2008, 09:20:52 AM
Good morning. I see that Joran's audition for Oprah at least earned him another Youtube appearance. That boy has a flare for the stage:)


The NBC Today morning show just just did a segment on Joran van der Sloot's escapade. Showed the video twice. Good, am glad the U.S. viewers are also getting some insight into the angry out-of-control goon.

If he will show such anger on a national television program we can only imagine what he would do alone if a girl refused his advances.


Or can you imagine his frustrations if he is participating in a "Bangbus" type of incident with a girl he has drugged with all of his macho friends watching, and he can't get it up for her? He only has eyes for Guido?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 13, 2008, 09:25:16 AM
I think the prosecutor should have proceeded with even a weak case, because it would be easy to "Perry Mason" or "Peter DeVries" him on the stand and gain a conviction via a confession. Rumors of how tuff he was to break in prison must have been absolutely false. I think he enjoyed his stay with 3 square meals a day and all of the sex he wanted. He was in his heaven.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 13, 2008, 09:49:21 AM
http://www.thenewstribune.com/tacoma/24hour/world/story/253583.html

"He did it out of a kind of frustration, annoyance," De Vries said on Nova Saturday. "I spoke with him later, and he apologized. And then he said that he actually wanted to curse me out during the broadcast, but he was able to refrain. But at the end, before he knew it, he had thrown the glass of wine in my face."

Show host Paul Witteman said Van der Sloot had told him afterward he had planned the act during the show.
"The further along the show went, the more he was annoyed because he had to explain again and again why he had lied" at the start of the investigation into Holloway's disappearance, Witteman said Van der Sloot told him.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 13, 2008, 09:50:21 AM
Just starting to catch up...not allot of time, I have an open house soon...did some one post "the wine incident" lol If so, can you bump it forward incase I don't get that far?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 13, 2008, 10:15:30 AM
Just starting to catch up...not allot of time, I have an open house soon...did some one post "the wine incident" lol If so, can you bump it forward incase I don't get that far?

never mind...got booted from the forum and there is was on the front page!!! lol


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 13, 2008, 10:28:36 AM
Good Morning Monkeys

I have scan this thread twice and ... cannot locate the link to the segment pertaining to Joran's temper tantrum.  Could somebody please provide it for me?

Thank you.

Janet
7:30 AM


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Helen Back on January 13, 2008, 10:32:31 AM
Was able to get it to play a little better but it's still "choppy".  Anway, here's a shot of Joran when he's getting mad at DeVries about something:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/Joranmad.jpg)

He has a PIG nose.

Hey Monkeys,

Missed you guys for a few days, but ssee you have all been hard at work, as usual.

Man, that's a nasty little Crust-Stache and starter beard Joran has going on!  *shiver*  From the Charles Manson Starter Kit!  Wreck, you kill me!

In my opinion, Joran, is trying to change hi appearance.  Welcome to OJ's World, Joran!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 13, 2008, 10:34:47 AM
Janet - here's the youtube CBB posted last night:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_mqdBSFwpyw


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 13, 2008, 10:38:06 AM
Janet - here's the youtube CBB posted last night:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_mqdBSFwpyw

Thanks Klaas

Yesterday I viewed a much longer segment and .... was trying to locate it.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: igsigs on January 13, 2008, 10:46:10 AM
That Boy Ain't Right

No surprise. The family dynamic plays out live - for all to see. The sociopath, the enabler and the empty shell.

Joran choosing DeVries as a target an obvious taunt ... that DeVries will respond to. I hope.

Anyone that thinks that the ALE 4 on the case are capable or motivated - i have a Natural Bridge in Aruba for sale.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 13, 2008, 10:46:41 AM
Janet - here is the link to the entire program:

http://player.omroep.nl/?aflID=6213320


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 13, 2008, 10:47:04 AM
Joran has incriminated himself with his own actions and words. Repeatedly lying, before anyone even knew for sure that Natalee was indeed missing, bragging of his sexual exploits with her while she was passed out in the car, framing the 2 security guards, confessing, being recorded talking as if he is guilty, leading the police to where he claimed her body was buried, heeding the adivce of his dad who is an attorney who was training to be a judge to not talk because without a body there is no crime, etc.

There is nothing Beth can do or say to make him look anywhere near as guilty as he has done all on his own. And that includes being the last known person to be seen with her.

The icing on the cake is that he now shows the world via TV that his lack of anger control proves that he is capable of not just rape, and illegally disposing of a body, but of murder as well.

I wouldn't be surprised at all one day if he doesn't actually produce a video of the crime to impress his friends and TV viewers. He knows he won't be prosecuted because of it. Bangbus.com might even pay him for it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: texasmom on January 13, 2008, 10:47:56 AM
The Oprah shows are taped so they may not be able to include this latest incident.  Maybe someone here knows Beth and can find out if it was already taped.  In my area Oprah comes on in the morning and then is replayed at 11:00 p.m.  Could be the same elsewhere. 

I'm told the show will not be taped until Tuesday, so there's time  :wink:

I hope they include this then. 

What's with the unshaved unkempt look? 
   

I have been thinking a lot about this and I think that when he was released from KIA and had pictures taken while unshaven at release time, that some of his girly groupies told him he looked 'hot' so he decided to keep the 'look'...perhaps even Guido told him he looked 'hot'  :wink:
He's got that George Michael kinda thing goin' on.  :wink:

 :smt046


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 13, 2008, 10:50:29 AM
http://www.telegraaf.nl/binnenland/3012123/_Moeder_Joran_maakt_excuses__.html?view=print

Moeder Joran maakt excuses
door een onzer verslaggevers
FILMPJE Direct na het incident kwam de moeder van Joran van der Sloot om excuses te maken.
 
 (http://www.telesport.nl/multimedia/archive/00148/joran4_jpg_148466d.jpg)


Peter R. de Vries: "Ze schaamde zich dood. Tijdens de uitzending had ze juist zitten vertellen dat Joran een doodnormale, keurige jongen is. Ze bood haar excuses aan en zei dat het nooit had mogen gebeuren."



Enige tijd later bood ook Joran zelf diverse keren zijn excuses aan de misdaadverslaggever aan. De Vries heeft de excuses aanvaard: "Ach, iedereen was het erover eens dat hij met deze daad vooral zichzelf een slechte dienst heeft bewezen. Als dit het ergste is wat je alsmisdaadverslaggever moet incasseren."



Pauw en Witteman reageerden geschrokken


Posted by Dutchdad at BFN:

Well , officially the wine-incident is closed now. Immediately after it happened Anita apologised for the behavior of het son , and Joran (who had left the studio after the incident) later came back and apologised more than once to Peter de Vries. De Vries accepted Joran's apologies , so that was the end of it.

Which will of course not mean it all will be forgotten now. The damage is done.

And I suppose this interview showed also something else to the American public: Peter R. De Vries is not a nice guy if you draw his attention the way J2K have. He will not let go , and he is known to keep this up for years if he has to.
It also showed that the Dutch people are still interested in this case , and want it to be solved.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 13, 2008, 10:53:35 AM
That Boy Ain't Right

No surprise. The family dynamic plays out live - for all to see. The sociopath, the enabler and the empty shell.

Joran choosing DeVries as a target an obvious taunt ... that DeVries will respond to. I hope.

Anyone that thinks that the ALE 4 on the case are capable or motivated - i have a Natural Bridge in Aruba for sale.

I am still not sure Poppa Van Der Sloot didn't participate in the rape himself, and in fact, his participation may be the reason she had to be drugged in the first place.

While Ms Sluut is away, the Mr Sluut wanted to play. What is killing her is that she knows what a perverted jack ass he is, and she knows it is true, once again.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 13, 2008, 10:53:44 AM
Janet - here is the link to the entire program:

http://player.omroep.nl/?aflID=6213320

Thank you Klaas

I do have link to the interview but ... I know that late yesterday afternoon a link was posted that accessed the the wine throwing incident.

Klass the video appeared on my computer to be in slow motion so ... it could have very well could have only appeared to be longer.  :roll:

Thanks again.   :)

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 13, 2008, 10:56:28 AM
http://www.telegraaf.nl/binnenland/3012123/_Moeder_Joran_maakt_excuses__.html?view=print

Moeder Joran maakt excuses
door een onzer verslaggevers
FILMPJE Direct na het incident kwam de moeder van Joran van der Sloot om excuses te maken.
 
 (http://www.telesport.nl/multimedia/archive/00148/joran4_jpg_148466d.jpg)


Peter R. de Vries: "Ze schaamde zich dood. Tijdens de uitzending had ze juist zitten vertellen dat Joran een doodnormale, keurige jongen is. Ze bood haar excuses aan en zei dat het nooit had mogen gebeuren."



Enige tijd later bood ook Joran zelf diverse keren zijn excuses aan de misdaadverslaggever aan. De Vries heeft de excuses aanvaard: "Ach, iedereen was het erover eens dat hij met deze daad vooral zichzelf een slechte dienst heeft bewezen. Als dit het ergste is wat je alsmisdaadverslaggever moet incasseren."



Pauw en Witteman reageerden geschrokken


Posted by Dutchdad at BFN:

Well , officially the wine-incident is closed now. Immediately after it happened Anita apologised for the behavior of het son , and Joran (who had left the studio after the incident) later came back and apologised more than once to Peter de Vries. De Vries accepted Joran's apologies , so that was the end of it.

Which will of course not mean it all will be forgotten now. The damage is done.

And I suppose this interview showed also something else to the American public: Peter R. De Vries is not a nice guy if you draw his attention the way J2K have. He will not let go , and he is known to keep this up for years if he has to.
It also showed that the Dutch people are still interested in this case , and want it to be solved.




Did you ever get to watch the video?

A firm stare and legitimate questions don't make Mr DeVries a bad man. Its a shame he could not have raised Joran. None of this would have happened, and Joran and Natalee would have bright futures.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 13, 2008, 10:59:14 AM
Janet - here is the link to the entire program:

http://player.omroep.nl/?aflID=6213320

Thank you Klaas

I do have link to the interview but ... I know that late yesterday afternoon a link was posted that accessed the the wine throwing incident.

Klass the video appeared on my computer to be in slow motion so ... it could have very well could have only appeared to be longer.  :roll:

Thanks again.   :)

Janet

Janet - I'm really not awake yet but the only video I've seen of the wine throwing was that short one CBB posted and I just saw that this morning.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 13, 2008, 11:03:45 AM
This may have already been posted:

http://www.thenewstribune.com/tacoma/24hour/world/story/253583.html

Ex-Holloway suspect in talk show spat

By TOBY STERLING
Last updated: January 13th, 2008 05:03 AM (PST)

A former suspect in the disappearance of an American teenager in Aruba threw wine in the face of a crime reporter after they appeared together on a talk show and the reporter challenged his honesty.

Joran van der Sloot appeared on the Dutch television program Friday night in what was billed as his last television interview about the case. Prosecutors in Aruba, where Natalee Holloway disappeared in 2005, have said they don't have enough evidence to charge him with a crime, although he remains a "person of interest" in what is now a cold case.

Van der Sloot, who denies any wrongdoing, appeared mostly relaxed throughout the TV appearance, despite remarks from crime reporter Peter R. De Vries challenging his honesty.

At the end of the Pauw & Witteman program, Van der Sloot and De Vries had a testy exchange in which Van der Sloot questioned whether De Vries would "be man enough" to apologize if evidence exonerating him came to light.

The live show ended with guests shaking each others' hands. Van der Sloot stood up, then abruptly grabbed a glass of wine and leaned across the table to toss the contents directly in De Vries' eyes at a moment when the reporter was looking down. That segment was broadcast Saturday night by a different news program, Nova.

Van der Sloot initially told investigators he last saw Holloway when he dropped her off at her hotel, but later he said he left her on the beach near her hotel. He has acknowledged the initial lie, and said he regrets it.

Holloway disappeared on May 30, 2005, hours before she was to return home to Mountain Brook, Ala. She was on the final night of her school graduation trip to the island.

Van der Sloot and two other former suspects, brothers Deepak and Satish Kalpoe, were seen leaving a bar with her that night. They were questioned early in the investigation and again late last year before being released. All three deny involvement in Holloway's disappearance.

Van der Sloot's Dutch lawyer and the show's producers could not immediately be reached for comment.

"He did it out of a kind of frustration, annoyance," De Vries said on Nova Saturday. "I spoke with him later, and he apologized. And then he said that he actually wanted to curse me out during the broadcast, but he was able to refrain. But at the end, before he knew it, he had thrown the glass of wine in my face."

Show host Paul Witteman said Van der Sloot had told him afterward he had planned the act during the show.


"The further along the show went, the more he was annoyed because he had to explain again and again why he had lied" at the start of the investigation into Holloway's disappearance, Witteman said Van der Sloot told him.

Van der Sloot thought, 'Now I'll grab my chance, now I can do it' (throw the wine), and then he did," Witteman said.

Witteman said he thought the move would damage Van der Sloot's credibility, the opposite of what his family had hoped the effect of appearing on the program would be.


Prosecutors say they cannot prove a crime was committed without a body, but they believe Holloway is dead.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: SarahD on January 13, 2008, 11:03:58 AM
I think the prosecutor should have proceeded with even a weak case, because it would be easy to "Perry Mason" or "Peter DeVries" him on the stand and gain a conviction via a confession. Rumors of how tuff he was to break in prison must have been absolutely false. I think he enjoyed his stay with 3 square meals a day and all of the sex he wanted. He was in his heaven.

I would not want the prosecutor to continue with a weak case if there was a chance Joran would get off.   I would rather they continue to try to find Natalee's body and then have the evidence they need to convict him. JMO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 13, 2008, 11:05:14 AM
The Joran look ...

My son went through a short period last year when he possessed that very look.  The first time I saw it ... I thought I was doing him a favor by pointing out that he had forgotten to shave and comb his hair.  His wife informed me that he had spent 20 minutes in the bathroom to obtain the "look" and ... she thought he looked great.  As most mother-in-laws have learned ... there is a time when enough has been said.    :lol:
   


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Dayhiker on January 13, 2008, 11:05:45 AM
Good morning. I see that Joran's audition for Oprah at least earned him another Youtube appearance. That boy has a flare for the stage:)


The NBC Today morning show just just did a segment on Joran van der Sloot's escapade. Showed the video twice. Good, am glad the U.S. viewers are also getting some insight into the angry out-of-control goon.

If he will show such anger on a national television program we can only imagine what he would do alone if a girl refused his advances.


I missed that, what did the commentators have to say about it?


PI, mainly a straight up news story about Joran van der Sloot going into an outrage on a Dutch television show. They let the video do the talking... twice.

Will be interested in seeing whether Fox and and Joran's friend Greta pick it up. Maybe she can get Tacos spin on why his client can't control his anger and has been to a shrink for his aggression, stealing and lying problems.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Dayhiker on January 13, 2008, 11:14:15 AM

"He did it out of a kind of frustration, annoyance," De Vries said on Nova Saturday. "I spoke with him later, and he apologized. And then he said that he actually wanted to curse me out during the broadcast, but he was able to refrain. But at the end, before he knew it, he had thrown the glass of wine in my face."

Show host Paul Witteman said Van der Sloot had told him afterward he had planned the act during the show.




Joran is saying he pre-planned this act. What kind of pent up anger does this hell-hound have that he pre-meditates his aggression.

What did he think ahead of time that he would gain by throwing wine in the face of a crime reporter talk show guest? Is he so selfish for his own release of aggression that he would basically destroy the false image his parents have worked so hard to script for him? The image of a good well-behaved boy Paulus and Anita had just had just spent and hour building up on the show?

What a loser.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: AZSunny on January 13, 2008, 11:20:53 AM
Watch PVDS after he realizes what happened.  He starts laughing.  So do the hosts.  How sick is that?   I wish we could see Anita's face.  She is probably laughing too.  What a sick individual.  Sick family! I wish  De Vires would sue for assault!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: AZSunny on January 13, 2008, 11:26:31 AM
Watch PVDS after he realizes what happened.  He starts laughing.  So do the hosts.  How sick is that?   I wish we could see Anita's face.  She is probably laughing too.  What a sick individual.  Sick family! I wish  De Vries  would sue for assault!

Correct spelling...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 13, 2008, 11:27:20 AM
Watch PVDS after he realizes what happened.  He starts laughing.  So do the hosts.  How sick is that?   I wish we could see Anita's face.  She is probably laughing too.  What a sick individual.  Sick family! I wish  De Vires would sue for assault!

If he had been my son, and had done that in front of God and the world, I would have beat him to within an inch of his life right there in front of the same audience. Yes, I admit, I would not have been worried about my lack of anger management, I would have been more concerned about my son's lack of discipline and parental upbringing.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 13, 2008, 11:27:54 AM
Watch PVDS after he realizes what happened.  He starts laughing.  So do the hosts.  How sick is that?   I wish we could see Anita's face.  She is probably laughing too.  What a sick individual.  Sick family! I wish  De Vires would sue for assault!

Yes..they were.

from BFN by Jos
http://www.novatv.nl/novaplayer/player169.html?bw=bb&player=wmp&id=hpe-1-0&x=11&y=6#

To summarize:

When Joran asks Peter if he would apologize, his mother laughs, you can hear that in the backround. When Joran throws the wine, you hear Anita say to him "Come on". The wife of Peter helps him with water and snapped at Anita: well, you have raised him well.

Peter: He has spoken with Joran after the incident. Joran told him earlier during the show he already wanted to yell at him but got himself under control. He planned to throw the wine after the show. Peter is not angry, he says it say a lot about Joran, not about him.

Peter Plasman (the bold guy/famous attorney, attorney of Mohammed B, the one who killed Theo van Gogh) gave an interesting analysis:
He blames Paul for bringing him there. You should never say on the show, like Anita, that in the beginning you suspected him. That wealens your case. He was a terrible director, the program was dramatic and the incident will remain to linger. To him it is unbelievable why the Sloots took the invitation because they could have know Peter R de Vries would ask persisting unpleasant questions. Bad choice, bad image now. He also finds it amazing the Sloots said they would have gone to the police if Joran admitted something. This undermines the parent-child relation. As for Joran's keeping silent during his last detention, it is understandable Paul advised him to keep silent, because the case was weak and if he would have talked he could have made mistakes. Innocent detainees make mistakes too.

It was very interesting. Let's see if Pauw & Witteman will say something about it tomorrow in their late night show.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: oldencrabby on January 13, 2008, 11:28:06 AM
I still want to slap that smirk right off Jorans' face!   :-x


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 13, 2008, 11:29:11 AM
Fox is showing the video about once an hour. The world is seeing what we have known for some time...Joran is a vindictive little prick.  If he would do that on a television show with a world wide audience what would he do to a young girl in the back of a car or in his own apartment?  Why do the Arubans and the Dutch continue this charade?  I simply don't understand what the real secret is here. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Vicki on January 13, 2008, 11:36:47 AM
Why would he get so upset when in his book, he has admitted being a LIAR???He just needs to be in control, ...poor Natalee, to have been in this monsters hands....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 13, 2008, 11:41:19 AM
Watch PVDS after he realizes what happened.  He starts laughing.  So do the hosts.  How sick is that?   I wish we could see Anita's face.  She is probably laughing too.  What a sick individual.  Sick family! I wish  De Vires would sue for assault!

Yes..they were.

from BFN by Jos
http://www.novatv.nl/novaplayer/player169.html?bw=bb&player=wmp&id=hpe-1-0&x=11&y=6#

To summarize:

When Joran asks Peter if he would apologize, his mother laughs, you can hear that in the backround. When Joran throws the wine, you hear Anita say to him "Come on". The wife of Peter helps him with water and snapped at Anita: well, you have raised him well.

Peter: He has spoken with Joran after the incident. Joran told him earlier during the show he already wanted to yell at him but got himself under control. He planned to throw the wine after the show. Peter is not angry, he says it say a lot about Joran, not about him.

Peter Plasman (the bold guy/famous attorney, attorney of Mohammed B, the one who killed Theo van Gogh) gave an interesting analysis:
He blames Paul for bringing him there. You should never say on the show, like Anita, that in the beginning you suspected him. That wealens your case. He was a terrible director, the program was dramatic and the incident will remain to linger. To him it is unbelievable why the Sloots took the invitation because they could have know Peter R de Vries would ask persisting unpleasant questions. Bad choice, bad image now. He also finds it amazing the Sloots said they would have gone to the police if Joran admitted something. This undermines the parent-child relation. As for Joran's keeping silent during his last detention, it is understandable Paul advised him to keep silent, because the case was weak and if he would have talked he could have made mistakes. Innocent detainees make mistakes too.

It was very interesting. Let's see if Pauw & Witteman will say something about it tomorrow in their late night show.



Well they watched Greta develop a crush on their Sprtster, and then allow herself to be figuratively raped by the charms of Joran and transformed into a believer of his lies, so I guess they thought his boyish charm would work on Peter, the hosts of the show, and the audience.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Red on January 13, 2008, 11:48:43 AM
http://www.thenewstribune.com/tacoma/24hour/world/story/253583.html

"He did it out of a kind of frustration, annoyance," De Vries said on Nova Saturday. "I spoke with him later, and he apologized. And then he said that he actually wanted to curse me out during the broadcast, but he was able to refrain. But at the end, before he knew it, he had thrown the glass of wine in my face."

Show host Paul Witteman said Van der Sloot had told him afterward he had planned the act during the show.
"The further along the show went, the more he was annoyed because he had to explain again and again why he had lied" at the start of the investigation into Holloway's disappearance, Witteman said Van der Sloot told him.

Front page post: Natalee Holloway Disappearance: Joran Van der Sloot Tosses Wine in Face of Reporter Peter R. De Vries on Dutch TV Show (Anger Management Issues)

http://scaredmonkeys.com/2008/01/13/natalee-holloway-disappearance-joran-van-der-sloot-tosses-wine-in-face-of-reporter-peter-r-de-vries-on-dutch-tv-show-anger-management-issues/#comment-794714


So how will Pappa Sloot and his cronies in Aruba explain away his son's actions this time?

Kind of hard to cover this one up Sloot's.

Then again, I guess Joran has thrown glasses of wine in the faces of people 20 times before, however, nothing like this had ever happened.

What a fine son you have raised Sloot's. I think all can see that he is incapable of controlling his temper. No one just sits in an interview where someone challenges him and acts upon those "super id" thoughts. People have the self control not to do so.

This was done in the public eye. Can we all just imagine what JVDS is capable of doing when no one is watching.

Is it any wonder why Joran would never show is face on Scared Monkeys ... the coward that he is. What's the matter Joran, can't throw wine over the web?

More importantly, is it any wonder why TEAM SLOOT has fought extensively to not have their son ever face trial and having to face a cross-examination from an opposing attorney.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 13, 2008, 11:49:20 AM
Fox is showing the video about once an hour. The world is seeing what we have known for some time...Joran is a vindictive little prick.  If he would do that on a television show with a world wide audience what would he do to a young girl in the back of a car or in his own apartment?  Why do the Arubans and the Dutch continue this charade?  I simply don't understand what the real secret is here. 

Remember, according to Peter, Joran pointed out that he refrained from cursing him out while the camera was rolling, thus proving he has self control.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 13, 2008, 11:52:41 AM
http://www.thenewstribune.com/tacoma/24hour/world/story/253583.html

"He did it out of a kind of frustration, annoyance," De Vries said on Nova Saturday. "I spoke with him later, and he apologized. And then he said that he actually wanted to curse me out during the broadcast, but he was able to refrain. But at the end, before he knew it, he had thrown the glass of wine in my face."

Show host Paul Witteman said Van der Sloot had told him afterward he had planned the act during the show.
"The further along the show went, the more he was annoyed because he had to explain again and again why he had lied" at the start of the investigation into Holloway's disappearance, Witteman said Van der Sloot told him.

Front page post: Natalee Holloway Disappearance: Joran Van der Sloot Tosses Wine in Face of Reporter Peter R. De Vries on Dutch TV Show (Anger Management Issues)

http://scaredmonkeys.com/2008/01/13/natalee-holloway-disappearance-joran-van-der-sloot-tosses-wine-in-face-of-reporter-peter-r-de-vries-on-dutch-tv-show-anger-management-issues/#comment-794714


So how will Pappa Sloot and his cronies in Aruba explain away his son's actions this time?

Kind of hard to cover this one up Sloot's.

Then again, I guess Joran has thrown glasses of wine in the faces of people 20 times before, however, nothing like this had ever happened.

What a fine son you have raised Sloot's. I think all can see that he is incapable of controlling his temper. No one just sits in an interview where someone challenges him and acts upon those "super id" thoughts. People have the self control not to do so.

This was done in the public eye. Can we all just imagine what JVDS is capable of doing when no one is watching.

Is it any wonder why Joran would never show is face on Scared Monkeys ... the coward that he is. What's the matter Joran, can't throw wine over the web?

More importantly, is it any wonder why TEAM SLOOT has fought extensively to not have their son ever face trial and having to face a cross-examination from an opposing attorney.

Even some of the Refugees are saying Joran was a dumb ass for pulling this stunt.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 13, 2008, 11:56:17 AM
http://www.thenewstribune.com/tacoma/24hour/world/story/253583.html

"He did it out of a kind of frustration, annoyance," De Vries said on Nova Saturday. "I spoke with him later, and he apologized. And then he said that he actually wanted to curse me out during the broadcast, but he was able to refrain. But at the end, before he knew it, he had thrown the glass of wine in my face."

Show host Paul Witteman said Van der Sloot had told him afterward he had planned the act during the show.
"The further along the show went, the more he was annoyed because he had to explain again and again why he had lied" at the start of the investigation into Holloway's disappearance, Witteman said Van der Sloot told him.

Front page post: Natalee Holloway Disappearance: Joran Van der Sloot Tosses Wine in Face of Reporter Peter R. De Vries on Dutch TV Show (Anger Management Issues)

http://scaredmonkeys.com/2008/01/13/natalee-holloway-disappearance-joran-van-der-sloot-tosses-wine-in-face-of-reporter-peter-r-de-vries-on-dutch-tv-show-anger-management-issues/#comment-794714


So how will Pappa Sloot and his cronies in Aruba explain away his son's actions this time?

Kind of hard to cover this one up Sloot's.

Then again, I guess Joran has thrown glasses of wine in the faces of people 20 times before, however, nothing like this had ever happened.

What a fine son you have raised Sloot's. I think all can see that he is incapable of controlling his temper. No one just sits in an interview where someone challenges him and acts upon those "super id" thoughts. People have the self control not to do so.

This was done in the public eye. Can we all just imagine what JVDS is capable of doing when no one is watching.

Is it any wonder why Joran would never show is face on Scared Monkeys ... the coward that he is. What's the matter Joran, can't throw wine over the web?

More importantly, is it any wonder why TEAM SLOOT has fought extensively to not have their son ever face trial and having to face a cross-examination from an opposing attorney.

Even some of the Refugees are saying Joran was a dumb ass for pulling this stunt.

And rightfully so. These people have lent him their credibility, their support, and their time, which he seemingly thinks so little of that he can't even give his self control. And despite their attitude towards Beth, by and large, most of them have honestly hoped for Natalee's safe return, even while supporting Joran's innocence. Not all, but most.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tylergal on January 13, 2008, 12:00:09 PM
http://www.thenewstribune.com/tacoma/24hour/world/story/253583.html

"He did it out of a kind of frustration, annoyance," De Vries said on Nova Saturday. "I spoke with him later, and he apologized. And then he said that he actually wanted to curse me out during the broadcast, but he was able to refrain. But at the end, before he knew it, he had thrown the glass of wine in my face."

Show host Paul Witteman said Van der Sloot had told him afterward he had planned the act during the show.
"The further along the show went, the more he was annoyed because he had to explain again and again why he had lied" at the start of the investigation into Holloway's disappearance, Witteman said Van der Sloot told him.



the more he was annoyed because he had to explain again and again why he had lied"

Just goes to show you, he has never had to "wait/want" for anything, that whatever he wanted he got it by whatever means, like with Natalee, and when he did not get what he wanted he could no longer hold his anger.  Thus, Natalee is no longer with us.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tylergal on January 13, 2008, 12:01:24 PM
http://www.thenewstribune.com/tacoma/24hour/world/story/253583.html

"He did it out of a kind of frustration, annoyance," De Vries said on Nova Saturday. "I spoke with him later, and he apologized. And then he said that he actually wanted to curse me out during the broadcast, but he was able to refrain. But at the end, before he knew it, he had thrown the glass of wine in my face."

Show host Paul Witteman said Van der Sloot had told him afterward he had planned the act during the show.
"The further along the show went, the more he was annoyed because he had to explain again and again why he had lied" at the start of the investigation into Holloway's disappearance, Witteman said Van der Sloot told him.

Front page post: Natalee Holloway Disappearance: Joran Van der Sloot Tosses Wine in Face of Reporter Peter R. De Vries on Dutch TV Show (Anger Management Issues)

http://scaredmonkeys.com/2008/01/13/natalee-holloway-disappearance-joran-van-der-sloot-tosses-wine-in-face-of-reporter-peter-r-de-vries-on-dutch-tv-show-anger-management-issues/#comment-794714


So how will Pappa Sloot and his cronies in Aruba explain away his son's actions this time?

Kind of hard to cover this one up Sloot's.

Then again, I guess Joran has thrown glasses of wine in the faces of people 20 times before, however, nothing like this had ever happened.

What a fine son you have raised Sloot's. I think all can see that he is incapable of controlling his temper. No one just sits in an interview where someone challenges him and acts upon those "super id" thoughts. People have the self control not to do so.

This was done in the public eye. Can we all just imagine what JVDS is capable of doing when no one is watching.

Is it any wonder why Joran would never show is face on Scared Monkeys ... the coward that he is. What's the matter Joran, can't throw wine over the web?

More importantly, is it any wonder why TEAM SLOOT has fought extensively to not have their son ever face trial and having to face a cross-examination from an opposing attorney.

Even some of the Refugees are saying Joran was a dumb ass for pulling this stunt.

So does that mean they are emerging from that 2-year coma.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 13, 2008, 12:06:08 PM
I am certainly not privvy to God's plan, and I am not prone to crediting to God the current events of the day, even though it is so. But in this case, it is so clear that the hand of God is at work accomplishing some plan which none of us can understand, that it is unavoidable for me to conclude anything else.

The fact that this fate befell Natalee in the first place.
The impunity of Aruba's powers to be.
The support Beth has received from everyone including the people, the media, Texas Equ Search, the Persistence, her Mtn Brook friends, etc.
And now Joran himself.
Everything about this case is too great, too absurd to have not been touched by God.
Yet I lack the vision to see what it is that he is surely accomplishing, right in front of my eyes.

My Mom always says you just have to have faith. I think she must be right.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Red on January 13, 2008, 12:09:31 PM
Fox is showing the video about once an hour. The world is seeing what we have known for some time...Joran is a vindictive little prick.  If he would do that on a television show with a world wide audience what would he do to a young girl in the back of a car or in his own apartment?  Why do the Arubans and the Dutch continue this charade?  I simply don't understand what the real secret is here. 

Remember, according to Peter, Joran pointed out that he refrained from cursing him out while the camera was rolling, thus proving he has self control.

That would be circular logic for self control.

That would be a kin to saying ... I wanted to kill and shoot him while he was saying that to my face during the interview.

So I refrained until after the show and stabbed him to death.

THAT WOULD BE WHAT WE CALL DAMAGE CONTROL SPIN.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 13, 2008, 12:11:19 PM
Fox is showing the video about once an hour. The world is seeing what we have known for some time...Joran is a vindictive little prick.  If he would do that on a television show with a world wide audience what would he do to a young girl in the back of a car or in his own apartment?  Why do the Arubans and the Dutch continue this charade?  I simply don't understand what the real secret is here. 

Remember, according to Peter, Joran pointed out that he refrained from cursing him out while the camera was rolling, thus proving he has self control.

That would be circular logic for self control.

That would be a kin to saying ... I wanted to kill and shoot him while he was saying that to my face during the interview.

So I refrained until after the show and stabbed him to death.

THAT WOULD BE WHAT WE CALL DAMAGE CONTROL SPIN.

Aruban Style:))))))))


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: hotping on January 13, 2008, 12:11:32 PM
I am certainly not privvy to God's plan, and I am not prone to crediting to God the current events of the day, even though it is so. But in this case, it is so clear that the hand of God is at work accomplishing some plan which none of us can understand, that it is unavoidable for me to conclude anything else.

The fact that this fate befell Natalee in the first place.
The impunity of Aruba's powers to be.
The support Beth has received from everyone including the people, the media, Texas Equ Search, the Persistence, her Mtn Brook friends, etc.
And now Joran himself.
Everything about this case is too great, too absurd to have not been touched by God.
Yet I lack the vision to see what it is that he is surely accomplishing, right in front of my eyes.

My Mom always says you just have to have faith. I think she must be right.
Your Mom is Right....Just look at Beth and Dave...Faith is what gets Them Through each Day...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tylergal on January 13, 2008, 12:16:09 PM
Watch PVDS after he realizes what happened.  He starts laughing.  So do the hosts.  How sick is that?   I wish we could see Anita's face.  She is probably laughing too.  What a sick individual.  Sick family! I wish  De Vires would sue for assault!

AZ Sunny, I felt the same as you when I saw it, that it was staged, and those in the coupe were elated.   I saw a well-scripted spin of half-truth from Anita in this interview which was turned like a wall of mirrors reflecting the pathology and instability of this vdS family, known by and with the acceptance of host.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 13, 2008, 12:17:35 PM
I am certainly not privvy to God's plan, and I am not prone to crediting to God the current events of the day, even though it is so. But in this case, it is so clear that the hand of God is at work accomplishing some plan which none of us can understand, that it is unavoidable for me to conclude anything else.

The fact that this fate befell Natalee in the first place.
The impunity of Aruba's powers to be.
The support Beth has received from everyone including the people, the media, Texas Equ Search, the Persistence, her Mtn Brook friends, etc.
And now Joran himself.
Everything about this case is too great, too absurd to have not been touched by God.
Yet I lack the vision to see what it is that he is surely accomplishing, right in front of my eyes.

My Mom always says you just have to have faith. I think she must be right.
Your Mom is Right....Just look at Beth and Dave...Faith is what gets Them Through each Day...

Her wisdom is more apparent to her children everyday of their lives:)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 13, 2008, 12:19:02 PM
Watch PVDS after he realizes what happened.  He starts laughing.  So do the hosts.  How sick is that?   I wish we could see Anita's face.  She is probably laughing too.  What a sick individual.  Sick family! I wish  De Vires would sue for assault!

AZ Sunny, I felt the same as you when I saw it, that it was staged, and those in the coupe were elated.   I saw a well-scripted spin of half-truth from Anita in this interview which was turned like a wall of mirrors reflecting the pathology and instability of this vdS family, known by and with the acceptance of host.

Could be, but it was ill advised and had horrible results for Joran.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Kat_Gram on January 13, 2008, 12:19:20 PM
When I was reading yesterday, it was mentioned in the transcript that there was a contract signed by the Sloots B4 they appeared on the show.
So, Devries being on the show was no surprise and the questions asked were 
pre determined. It is not as if the Sloots or Joran were ambushed by the host of the show in what questions they were going to discuss or DeVries presence.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Anna on January 13, 2008, 12:20:02 PM
With three sons over time, we have gone through a large variety of "looks" and this one of Joran's seems closest to the Justin Timberlake look one of mine employed at one time.

Self-inflicted buzz cut and three day stubble, etc. but not even in the throes of the JT look would any one of them sat down for a formal interview on international TV wearing that dopey looking baseball cap.

Joran does look very pale and gaunt and seems to blink his left eye much more than both or the right one.  I tend to think he has far greater mental problems than we have been led to believe.  Recall past instances of violence at Dunkin Donuts, throwing choller off the bridge, knife at C&C to intimidate girl, killing his own dog with a paint gun, kicking his younger brothers and on and on it goes.

Add to that the most generous offer of vd Straten to see that Joran got to go to a mental institution instead of regular prison and we have a goon out of control completely who is not playing with a full deck to start with. 

Bad combination.

MO

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: bleachedblack on January 13, 2008, 12:22:34 PM
Watch PVDS after he realizes what happened.  He starts laughing.  So do the hosts.  How sick is that?   I wish we could see Anita's face.  She is probably laughing too.  What a sick individual.  Sick family! I wish  De Vires would sue for assault!

If he had been my son, and had done that in front of God and the world, I would have beat him to within an inch of his life right there in front of the same audience. Yes, I admit, I would not have been worried about my lack of anger management, I would have been more concerned about my son's lack of discipline and parental upbringing.

I just watched the clip and read the interview translation. I am astounded and couldn't believe my eyes when I saw the 2 men on the right start to laugh after joran throws the wine? What is wrong with them all?  Joran is a time-bomb.......


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: hotping on January 13, 2008, 12:23:21 PM
I am certainly not privvy to God's plan, and I am not prone to crediting to God the current events of the day, even though it is so. But in this case, it is so clear that the hand of God is at work accomplishing some plan which none of us can understand, that it is unavoidable for me to conclude anything else.

The fact that this fate befell Natalee in the first place.
The impunity of Aruba's powers to be.
The support Beth has received from everyone including the people, the media, Texas Equ Search, the Persistence, her Mtn Brook friends, etc.
And now Joran himself.
Everything about this case is too great, too absurd to have not been touched by God.
Yet I lack the vision to see what it is that he is surely accomplishing, right in front of my eyes.

My Mom always says you just have to have faith. I think she must be right.
Your Mom is Right....Just look at Beth and Dave...Faith is what gets Them Through each Day...

Her wisdom is more apparent to her children everyday of their lives:)
I Can See that It Is.....Most Moms are That Way...I Know My Was!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tylergal on January 13, 2008, 12:23:50 PM
The Joran look ...

My son went through a short period last year when he possessed that very look.  The first time I saw it ... I thought I was doing him a favor by pointing out that he had forgotten to shave and comb his hair.  His wife informed me that he had spent 20 minutes in the bathroom to obtain the "look" and ... she thought he looked great.  As most mother-in-laws have learned ... there is a time when enough has been said.    :lol:
   

Janet, I trust in our DILs years beyond youth will come sage at which time they can reflect upon "WORDS" spoken in their youth were not of wisdom, but in haste, harmless as they may have thought them to be,were in such poor taste. 

Are we sure our DILs are not polygamists married to different men, in different cities, who travel between your house and mine? :lol: :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 13, 2008, 12:25:57 PM
Has anyone ever wondered what he was hiding under that hat?  Maybe someone has gotten to him and he didn't want to show the results.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: texasmom on January 13, 2008, 12:27:19 PM
Greta/Joran Interview Part 2
snip
VAN SUSTEREN: What's the anger management stuff, though? At some point, correct me if I'm wrong, that you were getting some sort of — you know, that — were you going to some courses or classes or something? Was there a problem with that?
VAN DER SLOOT: No, I never went to any.
VAN SUSTEREN: Nothing like that? Never been an anger issue?
VAN DER SLOOT: No. Never. No.
VAN SUSTEREN: That's just all made up?
VAN DER SLOOT: Yes.
VAN SUSTEREN: Totally — totally fiction?
VAN DER SLOOT: Totally made up.
VAN SUSTEREN: OK.
VAN DER SLOOT: Totally fiction.

 :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tylergal on January 13, 2008, 12:28:31 PM
Why would he get so upset when in his book, he has admitted being a LIAR???He just needs to be in control, ...poor Natalee, to have been in this monsters hands....

He views his book as his baptismal, washing his sins away, forgiveness in each statement, never to be looked upon again.   


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: hotping on January 13, 2008, 12:29:19 PM
Greta/Joran Interview Part 2
snip
VAN SUSTEREN: What's the anger management stuff, though? At some point, correct me if I'm wrong, that you were getting some sort of — you know, that — were you going to some courses or classes or something? Was there a problem with that?
VAN DER SLOOT: No, I never went to any.
VAN SUSTEREN: Nothing like that? Never been an anger issue?
VAN DER SLOOT: No. Never. No.
VAN SUSTEREN: That's just all made up?
VAN DER SLOOT: Yes.
VAN SUSTEREN: Totally — totally fiction?
VAN DER SLOOT: Totally made up.
VAN SUSTEREN: OK.
VAN DER SLOOT: Totally fiction.

 :lol:
Yeh Right Joran...Totally Madeup Fictional BS!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Kat_Gram on January 13, 2008, 12:29:38 PM
The show was over, how was Joran to know that the cameras were still rolling ?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: bleachedblack on January 13, 2008, 12:30:25 PM
When I was reading yesterday, it was mentioned in the transcript that there was a contract signed by the Sloots B4 they appeared on the show.
So, Devries being on the show was no surprise and the questions asked were 
pre determined. It is not as if the Sloots or Joran were ambushed by the host of the show in what questions they were going to discuss or DeVries presence.

Witt.: Let’s agree that we the second part of the show will give you the opportunity to do that but first let’s tell the story of the VdSloot-family according to the rules we’ve in advance agreed on with Joran namely that we first look at what actually happened. Because you say I kept my mouth shut. I didn’t tell them anything more and they didn’t come up with anything new. Were those interrogations despite that tough?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Anna on January 13, 2008, 12:34:38 PM
I'm pretty sure Joran and his Aruban enablers will next spin this that it was DeVries fault, he just pushed Sporter beyond endurance and had it coming, etc.

They always blame the victim sooner or later.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 13, 2008, 12:39:01 PM
O/T

http://apnews.excite.com/article/20080113/D8U54GVG0.html

Suspect in Slain Marine Case Seen in La.

Jan 13, 12:18 PM (ET)

By MIKE BAKER
 
(AP) This photo provided by the U.S. Marine Corps, shows Cpl. Cesar Armando Laurean. Marine Cpl. Cesar...
(http://ak.imgfarm.com/images/ap/Missing_Marine.sff_NY127_20080113090410.jpg)
 
 

JACKSONVILLE, N.C. (AP) - The key suspect in the brutal slaying of a 20-year-old pregnant Marine was spotted in Louisiana and could be headed into Texas, authorities said Sunday.

Marine Cpl. Cesar Armando Laurean was seen getting on or off a Greyhound bus in Shreveport, La., Saturday night, said Shreveport police Chief Henry Whitehorn Sr.

"We're working with the U.S. Marshal's Service and other law enforcement agencies trying to locate him," Whitehorn told The Associated Press. "We don't know if he is still in the area. We believe it may have just been a pass through. We received information he may be headed into Texas."

THIS IS A BREAKING NEWS UPDATE. Check back soon for further information. AP's earlier story is below.

(snipped)



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: bleachedblack on January 13, 2008, 12:39:51 PM
Another thing about the wine throwing incident that seems to give it an even nastier twist IMO is that on the table in front of joran were 2 glasses, one glass of wine and a glass of water. In that split second he reached for, grabbed and tossed the wine at Mr Devries.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: San on January 13, 2008, 01:04:19 PM
I'm pretty sure Joran and his Aruban enablers will next spin this that it was DeVries fault, he just pushed Sporter beyond endurance and had it coming, etc.

They always blame the victim sooner or later.

.

They can spin themselves right into the ground with this one because the proof is on video that when he is pushed with a few questions he lost his temper.

Now with this said Joran lost his temper with De Vries over his questioning can you imagine what a real interrogator would have accomplished.

BOYCOTT ARUBA.  THE PROTECTOR OF MURDERERS.  ONE CORRUPT DIRTY ISLAND.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Anna on January 13, 2008, 01:05:04 PM
Not sure if this has already been posted or not but look at Minutes 3:35 for the wine throwing.

KLAAS, there is a brief shot of Joran sans the grunge baseball cap.  Can you "capture" that for a better look?

Also note Peter deVries in agony with alcohol in his eyes and his wife trying to wash it out with water, etc. while Anita cackles?

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Anna on January 13, 2008, 01:05:44 PM
Forgot the link:

http://www.novatv.nl/novaplayer/player169.html?bw=bb&player=wmp&id=hpe-1-0&x=44&y=6


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Anna on January 13, 2008, 01:08:24 PM
I'm pretty sure Joran and his Aruban enablers will next spin this that it was DeVries fault, he just pushed Sporter beyond endurance and had it coming, etc.

They always blame the victim sooner or later.

.

They can spin themselves right into the ground with this one because the proof is on video that when he is pushed with a few questions he lost his temper.

Now with this said Joran lost his temper with De Vries over his questioning can you imagine what a real interrogator would have accomplished.

BOYCOTT ARUBA.  THE PROTECTOR OF MURDERERS.  ONE CORRUPT DIRTY ISLAND.

Speaking of "pushed" isn't that an odd choice of words for Joran to use?  I never pushed a girl, etc.  Who said he had pushed one?  He was thinking pushed for some reason, IMO, because that is what he did.  When Natalee kept falling down per his story to Freddie, he was pushing her.  IMO.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 13, 2008, 01:16:14 PM
New gif created from the short video:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/JoranWineAnger.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 13, 2008, 01:19:16 PM

Camera can't find a good side for AVDS, it seems.   :P


 :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Good one!!

Thanks, Sharon....jersey humor?....glad you got it... :lol: :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 13, 2008, 01:20:23 PM
Forgot the link:

http://www.novatv.nl/novaplayer/player169.html?bw=bb&player=wmp&id=hpe-1-0&x=44&y=6

Anna, I'm having problems getting these videos to play.  If I can get it working I'll do a screen capture.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: jackb on January 13, 2008, 01:20:56 PM
no gwen is gagal .....right Klaas?

Yep

These girls act like they were there and are always trying to keep Joran and company out of it.  What is their stake in all this.  Makes me wonder.   Jack Blue


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: texasmom on January 13, 2008, 01:22:32 PM
Greta/Joran Interview Part 2snip
VAN SUSTEREN: What's the anger management stuff, though? At some point, correct me if I'm wrong, that you were getting some sort of — you know, that — were you going to some courses or classes or something? Was there a problem with that?
VAN DER SLOOT: No, I never went to any.
VAN SUSTEREN: Nothing like that? Never been an anger issue?
VAN DER SLOOT: No. Never. No.
VAN SUSTEREN: That's just all made up?
VAN DER SLOOT: Yes.
VAN SUSTEREN: Totally — totally fiction?
VAN DER SLOOT: Totally made up.
VAN SUSTEREN: OK.
VAN DER SLOOT: Totally fiction.

 :lol:

This was actually in Part 3 of the Greta/Joran interview  :oops:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: robots on January 13, 2008, 01:24:26 PM
sloots

spelled backwards = STOOLS


hehehehehehhehehehee


thats about right  :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: robots on January 13, 2008, 01:26:00 PM
joran van der stools


ASSAULTS  TV person


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 13, 2008, 01:28:22 PM
Watch PVDS after he realizes what happened.  He starts laughing.  So do the hosts.  How sick is that?   I wish we could see Anita's face.  She is probably laughing too.  What a sick individual.  Sick family! I wish  De Vires would sue for assault!

AZSunny, I noticed the same thing and because I was catching up, waited to see if someone else posted this.  The host smiling/laughing was mentioned last night, and some said smiles or laughter might be momentary reactions of surprise or shock...others said no way would they find it humorous.  His father laughing, though...ugh...my father would have kicked him in the azz.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: texasmom on January 13, 2008, 01:28:28 PM
O/T

http://apnews.excite.com/article/20080113/D8U54GVG0.html

Suspect in Slain Marine Case Seen in La.

Jan 13, 12:18 PM (ET)

By MIKE BAKER
 
(AP) This photo provided by the U.S. Marine Corps, shows Cpl. Cesar Armando Laurean. Marine Cpl. Cesar...
(http://ak.imgfarm.com/images/ap/Missing_Marine.sff_NY127_20080113090410.jpg)
 
 

JACKSONVILLE, N.C. (AP) - The key suspect in the brutal slaying of a 20-year-old pregnant Marine was spotted in Louisiana and could be headed into Texas, authorities said Sunday.

Marine Cpl. Cesar Armando Laurean was seen getting on or off a Greyhound bus in Shreveport, La., Saturday night, said Shreveport police Chief Henry Whitehorn Sr.

"We're working with the U.S. Marshal's Service and other law enforcement agencies trying to locate him," Whitehorn told The Associated Press. "We don't know if he is still in the area. We believe it may have just been a pass through. We received information he may be headed into Texas."

THIS IS A BREAKING NEWS UPDATE. Check back soon for further information. AP's earlier story is below.

(snipped)



 :shock:

thanks Klaas, hadn't heard that update.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Hotshot on January 13, 2008, 01:29:45 PM
Well I just video'd it to upload on youtube.  You can see Anita saying "Oh no", and then you can see DeVries wife throw water at Joran.  It's kind of comical.  When its all uploaded, I will post the link.  


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: jackb on January 13, 2008, 01:32:22 PM
Has anyone ever wondered what he was hiding under that hat?  Maybe someone has gotten to him and he didn't want to show the results.

Joran is losing his hair.  He does not look as young and "innocent" when this fact is showing up.      Jack blue


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: crazybabyborg on January 13, 2008, 01:33:25 PM
What Joran has managed to accomplish with this temper trantrum outburst is this:

To those who have followed the story closely and are convinced of his guilt, it moves them toward belief that Natalee did not die accidently, but at the hand of Joran's anger.

To those who saw Greta's interview and agree with her that he probably had nothing to do with her death, it shows a very different Joran who is in stark contrast to the "angelic faced" youth victimized by circumstances. He moves them to doubt.

Joran's background of killing his dog, and harming his brother to the point of requiring professional mental services fits like a glove with what we can see with our own eyes. I look at Joran and see Dexter.

They accomplished the exact opposite of what they set out to by doing the interview.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 13, 2008, 01:36:32 PM
Well I just video'd it to upload on youtube.  You can see Anita saying "Oh no", and then you can see DeVries wife throw water at Joran.  It's kind of comical.  When its all uploaded, I will post the link.  

Thanks Hotshot


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: JA on January 13, 2008, 01:37:50 PM
 I watched the NOVA clip and am so disgusted that Paulus is laughing after the incident.  I'm almost wondering if he knew of Joran's "plan" in advance.  It almost looks as if Peter's wife reached onto the table and threw something back at Joran or leaned over to yell at him.  Joran starts out being so smug and assured of himself, and as soon as he isn't just allowed to talk about what he wants to and is contested in his train of thought, you can see his body language change.

I still think Anita is just basically an enabling fool who doesn't have a clue.  Yes, she knows Paulus and her "delicious" Sporter are guilty of many things, but she has pretended and closed her eyes and years for so  many years that she lives in a fantasy world.  I imagine Paulus and the boys laugh about her behind her back ( or to her face).  I bet she honestly thought she could change what the world thinks about Joran from this show, regardless that Paulus and Joran really don't care what anyone thinks about them.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: wreck on January 13, 2008, 01:39:21 PM
What Joran has managed to accomplish with this temper trantrum outburst is this:

To those who have followed the story closely and are convinced of his guilt, it moves them toward belief that Natalee did not die accidently, but at the hand of Joran's anger.

To those who saw Greta's interview and agree with her that he probably had nothing to do with her death, it shows a very different Joran who is in stark contrast to the "angelic faced" youth victimized by circumstances. He moves them to doubt.

Joran's background of killing his dog, and harming his brother to the point of requiring professional mental services fits like a glove with what we can see with our own eyes. I look at Joran and see Dexter.

They accomplished the exact opposite of what they set out to by doing the interview.
Bingo!!

(The only difference is that I somehow "like" Dexter)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Hotshot on January 13, 2008, 01:39:50 PM
Well I just video'd it to upload on youtube.  You can see Anita saying "Oh no", and then you can see DeVries wife throw water at Joran.  It's kind of comical.  When its all uploaded, I will post the link.  

Thanks Hotshot
Your Welcome.  Klaas you may want to take it when uploaded, and put music to it or something, you can hear my birds in the background, and also without editting they may take it down...."their terms"


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: bleachedblack on January 13, 2008, 01:40:25 PM
joran van der stools


ASSAULTS  TV person
:smt105   :smt043 :smt077


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Anna on January 13, 2008, 01:42:43 PM
Klaas,

Sorry, think it is a false alarm from me as on closer inspection, it appears that is not Joran but a technician working with a cable of some sort.  Both wearing black.  I did so want to see Joran without that cap!  Guess he didn't remove it even when assaulting others.


(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Holloway/2008-01-13_123458.png)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: bleachedblack on January 13, 2008, 01:43:27 PM
Has anyone ever wondered what he was hiding under that hat?  Maybe someone has gotten to him and he didn't want to show the results.

Joran is losing his hair.  He does not look as young and "innocent" when this fact is showing up.      Jack blue

I wondered about this too. Receded beyond recognition  :smt096


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: dennisintn on January 13, 2008, 01:45:49 PM
Forgot the link:

http://www.novatv.nl/novaplayer/player169.html?bw=bb&player=wmp&id=hpe-1-0&x=44&y=6
thank you very much for this, miss anna.  if you see a transcript of this, please post it too.
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: texasmom on January 13, 2008, 01:47:18 PM
I'm pretty sure Joran and his Aruban enablers will next spin this that it was DeVries fault, he just pushed Sporter beyond endurance and had it coming, etc.

They always blame the victim sooner or later.

.

They can spin themselves right into the ground with this one because the proof is on video that when he is pushed with a few questions he lost his temper.

Now with this said Joran lost his temper with De Vries over his questioning can you imagine what a real interrogator would have accomplished.

BOYCOTT ARUBA.  THE PROTECTOR OF MURDERERS.  ONE CORRUPT DIRTY ISLAND.

AMEN!   :smt045 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: bleachedblack on January 13, 2008, 01:47:30 PM
joran van der stools


ASSAULTS  TV person
:smt105   :smt043 :smt077

This is the one i meant to laugh at.......it's early yet I'm not awake.  :smt025

Robots wrote;

Quote
sloots

spelled backwards = STOOLS


hehehehehehhehehehee


thats about right  Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: San on January 13, 2008, 01:47:32 PM
After watching this video it am amazing how the Sloots reacted.  They couldn't care less what Joran did.  Look at Anita and her actions after Joran threw the wine.  No concern what so ever and for a second Joran stood there watching De Vries in pain.  Joran enjoyed it.  Then he left and guess what Paulus does he runs out with Joran.  They are true cowards.  I hope the entire Sloot family rots in hell.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Anna on January 13, 2008, 01:49:34 PM
DeVries wife seems pretty steamed about this.

Something tells me she won't let him forget what Joran did, lol.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Hotshot on January 13, 2008, 01:51:39 PM
here ya go

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mLyW8zoNU5I


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: bleachedblack on January 13, 2008, 01:54:23 PM
Assault.... pure and simple. Doubt Devries will let it go without charges. MJO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: crazybabyborg on January 13, 2008, 01:58:46 PM
here ya go

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mLyW8zoNU5I

Thanks Hotshot. I could only get audio with the Nova link. I took the video second by second and paused it. I don't see anyone laughing, Sloots or studio staff.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: wreck on January 13, 2008, 01:59:12 PM
Assault.... pure and simple. Doubt Devries will let it go without charges. MJO
Chidish, petty, and inapproriate - yes! Assault -- NO (Devries would look worse than Joran for filing charges for that) MOO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Hotshot on January 13, 2008, 02:02:43 PM
here ya go

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mLyW8zoNU5I

Thanks Hotshot. I could only get audio with the Nova link. I took the video second by second and paused it. I don't see anyone laughing, Sloots or studio staff.
Your Welcome.  I don't think I see them laughing either, but Anita is pretty upset for sure.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 13, 2008, 02:03:19 PM
here ya go

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mLyW8zoNU5I

Thanks Hotshot - I copied it too!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 13, 2008, 02:03:40 PM
Greta now has it on her blog:  http://gretawire.foxnews.com/2008/01/13/trouble-in-holland-for-joran/#comments


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Red on January 13, 2008, 02:05:43 PM
Think of what kind of a cretin Joran Van der Sloot really is.

Every one is shaking hands after the interview. What does Joran do ... throws wine in an unsuspecting persons face. Does this moron ever think that wine in ones eyes could actually cause blindness?

He just doesn't care, because he has never received a beating in his life as punishment for any of his actions. Instead, his actions were covered up by mommy and daddy Sloot. You have raised quite a winner Anita and Paul.

His actions lead me to another rather interesting thought that I will share shortly ...



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Anna on January 13, 2008, 02:05:51 PM
There are several posts of it on YouTube now I see, some with lots of comments, mostly in Dutch.  One has nearly 70K hits already so this is being widely seen where Joran supposedly attends school or whatever it is he does when in Holland.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 13, 2008, 02:06:47 PM
The video now in photobucket too:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/th_YouTube-JoranvsDevries.jpg) (http://s118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/?action=view&current=YouTube-JoranvsDevries.flv)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: crazybabyborg on January 13, 2008, 02:08:11 PM
here ya go

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mLyW8zoNU5I

Thanks Hotshot. I could only get audio with the Nova link. I took the video second by second and paused it. I don't see anyone laughing, Sloots or studio staff.
Your Welcome.  I don't think I see them laughing either, but Anita is pretty upset for sure.

Yes, she is and she's turned toward Joran with it. Paulus, too, turns toward Joran. I don't think anyone thought it was funny judging from what I can see in the video.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Observer on January 13, 2008, 02:08:32 PM
Hi everyone! I talked to John briefly last night to try to obtain an update.  However, it was bad timing since he and and a few others were in the middle of the grocery store buying supplies for the Persistence! He was able to tell me that there is a limit on the amount of "eggs" you can buy there! Shortage and all! He couldn't provide me with an update at that time! But, I now know there is a shortage of eggs on Aruba.  That's something I didn't know before! L!

I will try to call him later this evening to see if he can tell me a little more! Have a good day. I'm sure Kyle will be posting later on today.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Hotshot on January 13, 2008, 02:08:55 PM
here ya go

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mLyW8zoNU5I

Thanks Hotshot - I copied it too!
Quite Welcome!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 13, 2008, 02:13:42 PM
I love the look on Anita's face, it's like "oh Joran why did you have to lose your temper again"


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 13, 2008, 02:15:08 PM
Hi everyone! I talked to John briefly last night to try to obtain an update.  However, it was bad timing since he and and a few others were in the middle of the grocery store buying supplies for the Persistence! He was able to tell me that there is a limit on the amount of "eggs" you can buy there! Shortage and all! He couldn't provide me with an update at that time! But, I now know there is a shortage of eggs on Aruba.  That's something I didn't know before! L!

I will try to call him later this evening to see if he can tell me a little more! Have a good day. I'm sure Kyle will be posting later on today.

I'm surprised there's a shortage of eggs with the number of "chickens" Aruba apparantly has  :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Hotshot on January 13, 2008, 02:16:06 PM
I love the look on Anita's face, it's like "oh Joran why did you have to lose your temper again"

Yup, like "oh geezzzz you just blew this show, now we will have to do another to explain why you did this".  "I'll have to try and find another non see through blouse"!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: jackb on January 13, 2008, 02:22:41 PM
Hi everyone! I talked to John briefly last night to try to obtain an update.  However, it was bad timing since he and and a few others were in the middle of the grocery store buying supplies for the Persistence! He was able to tell me that there is a limit on the amount of "eggs" you can buy there! Shortage and all! He couldn't provide me with an update at that time! But, I now know there is a shortage of eggs on Aruba.  That's something I didn't know before! L!

I will try to call him later this evening to see if he can tell me a little more! Have a good day. I'm sure Kyle will be posting later on today.

I wonder why?  There is no lack of "chicken" down there, now is there?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Anna on January 13, 2008, 02:23:20 PM
I think this is the last time the Sloots had control over Joran and even that looks questionable.

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Holloway/slootfam.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: SarahD on January 13, 2008, 02:26:19 PM
I still want to slap that smirk right off Jorans' face!   :-x

Me too.  :)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 13, 2008, 02:29:50 PM
I am certainly not privvy to God's plan, and I am not prone to crediting to God the current events of the day, even though it is so. But in this case, it is so clear that the hand of God is at work accomplishing some plan which none of us can understand, that it is unavoidable for me to conclude anything else.

The fact that this fate befell Natalee in the first place.
The impunity of Aruba's powers to be.
The support Beth has received from everyone including the people, the media, Texas Equ Search, the Persistence, her Mtn Brook friends, etc.
And now Joran himself.
Everything about this case is too great, too absurd to have not been touched by God.
Yet I lack the vision to see what it is that he is surely accomplishing, right in front of my eyes.

My Mom always says you just have to have faith. I think she must be right.

PI ... your mom is so right.

God is the author of the Natalee Holloway story ... beginning to end.  However ...  we are not privy to the contents of the final chapter.  At times it is soo difficult to wait on God in regards to His perfect plan.  However ... this is where our trust and faith is tested.

Janet

+++++++++++


Romans 8:28
We know that in all things God works for the good of those who love him, who have been called according to his purpose.


Galatians 6:9
Let us not become weary in doing good, for at the proper time we will reap a harvest if we do not give up.


Psalm 37:7
Be still in the presence of the Lord, and wait patiently for him to act.  Don’t worry about evil people who prosper or fret about their wicked schemes.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: texasmom on January 13, 2008, 02:31:16 PM
I love the look on Anita's face, it's like "oh Joran why did you have to lose your temper again"

Has anyone said what Joran said to the host immediately after throwing the wine, I can tell that he said something....a few words..... 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: AZSunny on January 13, 2008, 02:33:29 PM
Watch PVDS after he realizes what happened.  He starts laughing.  So do the hosts.  How sick is that?   I wish we could see Anita's face.  She is probably laughing too.  What a sick individual.  Sick family! I wish  De Vires would sue for assault!

AZSunny, I noticed the same thing and because I was catching up, waited to see if someone else posted this.  The host smiling/laughing was mentioned last night, and some said smiles or laughter might be momentary reactions of surprise or shock...others said no way would they find it humorous.  His father laughing, though...ugh...my father would have kicked him in the azz.

I agree, and my father would not have taken me outside to do it.  It would have been handled right there for all to see!!  If I saw something like that happen, I wouldn't laugh, I would be stunned with my mouth hanging open!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 13, 2008, 02:37:01 PM
I'd like to know what Joran says just after throwing the wine...he turns his head a bit and says something. (I noticed that mostly in the slow motion video)

Also...in HotShots video just as Peter's wife throws water at Joran I can hear words that say...you can forget about being paid now....or something like that. Was that sound from the video or from other background noise at HotShots house??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Kat_Gram on January 13, 2008, 02:37:05 PM
There must have been a great deal of coaching of Joran B4 they went on the show. Joran has always had an attitude of entitlement in his dealings with others. And nothing has ever been his fault. He has had alot of opportunites that other ppl have not; caring and loving parents who would and do do everything for him, the financial advantage that the Sloots had in Aruba; the privates schooling; the sports he was enrolled in; the class advantage of the Sloots in Aruba. There must have been something wrong with Joran from an early age that was never recognized or dealt with.     


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 13, 2008, 02:37:16 PM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/1LOCK.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 13, 2008, 02:38:26 PM
I think this is the last time the Sloots had control over Joran and even that looks questionable.

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Holloway/slootfam.jpg)

This happy family picture of Anita, Paulus and Joran makes me so sad.  It is a reminder that the choices each of us make along the paths of our lives determines ... to a great extent ... how the journey will end.

Janet 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 13, 2008, 02:38:54 PM
Greta now has it on her blog:  http://gretawire.foxnews.com/2008/01/13/trouble-in-holland-for-joran/#comments

The Greta who reiterated that she was inclined to believe him?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 13, 2008, 02:40:07 PM
I'd like to know what Joran says just after throwing the wine...he turns his head a bit and says something. (I noticed that mostly in the slow motion video)
Also...in HotShots video just as Peter's wife throws water at Joran I can hear words that say...you can forget about being paid now....or something like that. Was that sound from the video or from other background noise at HotShots house??

Nut ... do you have the link to the slow motion video?

Thanks

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 13, 2008, 02:40:16 PM
Greta now has it on her blog:  http://gretawire.foxnews.com/2008/01/13/trouble-in-holland-for-joran/#comments

The Greta who reiterated that she was inclined to believe him?

For all I care she can have him!!!!!!!!!! Her poster child. Maybe she will watch Mr DeVries and learn how to interview!!!!!!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: SarahD on January 13, 2008, 02:44:25 PM
Hello everyone. I was reading back and trying to catch up.  As you can see, I read more here then I respond.    Sometimes the conversation just goes too fast to keep up.  Hope everyone is having a good day.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 13, 2008, 02:44:48 PM
Greta now has it on her blog:  http://gretawire.foxnews.com/2008/01/13/trouble-in-holland-for-joran/#comments

The Greta who reiterated that she was inclined to believe him?

One and the same :roll: :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 13, 2008, 02:45:44 PM
here ya go

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mLyW8zoNU5I

Thanks Hotshot.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 13, 2008, 02:47:32 PM
here ya go

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mLyW8zoNU5I

Thanks Hotshot. I could only get audio with the Nova link. I took the video second by second and paused it. I don't see anyone laughing, Sloots or studio staff.
Your Welcome.  I don't think I see them laughing either, but Anita is pretty upset for sure.

Yes, she is and she's turned toward Joran with it. Paulus, too, turns toward Joran. I don't think anyone thought it was funny judging from what I can see in the video.

imo, this was another video from another angle...this is not the same one viewed earlier....Paulus & the one host definitely were smiling when it occurred in the first film.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Lala'sMom on January 13, 2008, 02:55:24 PM
I think this is the last time the Sloots had control over Joran and even that looks questionable.

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Holloway/slootfam.jpg)

When I saw this, I almost felt sympathy for Anita...almost until I remembered that precious photo of Natalee with her dog sitting on a bed.  So many lives torn apart...ruined...forever.  For once, I am without words to explain how it makes me feel.  :sad:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 13, 2008, 03:01:52 PM
I'd like to know what Joran says just after throwing the wine...he turns his head a bit and says something. (I noticed that mostly in the slow motion video)
Also...in HotShots video just as Peter's wife throws water at Joran I can hear words that say...you can forget about being paid now....or something like that. Was that sound from the video or from other background noise at HotShots house??

Nut ... do you have the link to the slow motion video?

Thanks

Janet

Someone has probably already posted...it took me a while to find it...Paulus smiled..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_mqdBSFwpyw


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 13, 2008, 03:08:22 PM
I think this is the last time the Sloots had control over Joran and even that looks questionable.

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Holloway/slootfam.jpg)

When I saw this, I almost felt sympathy for Anita...almost until I remembered that precious photo of Natalee with her dog sitting on a bed.  So many lives torn apart...ruined...forever.  For once, I am without words to explain how it makes me feel.  :sad:

Anita is like Dorithy in the Wizard of Oz. She needs to click her heels, let Joran face his consequences, and salvage the good life she dreamed for the rest of her family. And in time, Joran can rejoin them. Beth on the other hand, can move forward and have a good life, but Natalee can never rejoin her in this life time. Anita, it is getting old waiting on you.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Kat_Gram on January 13, 2008, 03:16:17 PM
That picture of the Sloots makes me sad also.
Joran has inflicted suffering on so many persons. I really do think that if he had not been so concerned with himself that when the " something bad happened "
he could have called for some sort of assistance.
He can't go back and undo what he did, but he could certainly end the question as to where Natalee is and give her family some sort of ending, not a happy one, but something so that they can begin to heal.
But from what Paulus has said, they want to dig up some dirt on Natalee's family and Natalee as if that is the question. Retaliation for Joran.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: San on January 13, 2008, 03:18:46 PM
I love the look on Anita's face, it's like "oh Joran why did you have to lose your temper again"

Has anyone said what Joran said to the host immediately after throwing the wine, I can tell that he said something....a few words..... 

He said how dare you question the great Joran don't you know who I am. :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 13, 2008, 03:19:54 PM
http://www.telegraaf.nl/binnenland/3012123/_Moeder_Joran_maakt_excuses__.html?pageNumber=2

333 Comments to the Telegraaf article about "The Mother of Joran makes Excuses"


Quote
Joran is blijkbaar agressief en heeft duidelijk laten zien dat hij niet spoort! Die jongen heeft geen controle over zichzelf!
PT, Gr | 10:15 | 13.01.08
Δ Ik heb een klacht over deze reactie

Joran are apparently aggressive and clearly have shown that he does not go by rail! That boy has no control concerning itself!


Quote
Joran kan zich duidelijk niet beheersen, explosieve jongen dus.Zegt mij genoeg.
Valinjeeigenkuil, Den haag | 10:17 | 13.01.08
Δ Ik heb een klacht over deze reactie

Joran cannot master themselves clearly, explosive give birth therefore says enough me.

Quote
excuses worden altijd gemaakt na de zonde.. weer een bewijs. het word zo nog een camelion klucht ,mits de daad niet zo vreselijk was,, PS zullen de gevoelens van een moeder van een vermoord kind verschillen van die van een moordend kind?????..
raag, scherpenzeel | 10:29 | 13.01.08
Δ Ik heb een klacht over deze reactie

excuses are always made after the sin.. a proof it become this way still camelion klucht, subject to the action not this way terrible,, P were the feelings from a mother from an assassinated child will differ from those from a murderous child?????..

Quote
Je zal toch maar de moeder van Joran zijn, dan ben je mooi klaar ! Ik denk dat zij zelf ook wel voelt dat de jongen keihard zit te liegen. Het ergste is nog dat het gedrocht een air heeft alsof hij denkt dat hij de hele wereld in zijn zak heeft. Met deze zet laat hij al zien dat hij zichzelf niet onder controle heeft. Sukkel ! Ik hoop dat Peter R de Vries snel achter de waarheid komt
een moeder, almere | 10:47 | 13.01.08
Δ Ik heb een klacht over deze reactie

You nevertheless but the mother of Joran will be, then are you nicely ready! I think that she himself feels also that the boy sits lie rockly-hard. Most awful is still that the gedrocht has an air as if he thinks that he has the complete world in its pocket. With this move he shows already that he does not have itself under control. Sukkel! I hope that peter r freezes rapidly behind truth comes .


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: crazybabyborg on January 13, 2008, 03:21:21 PM
DeVries' wife had a few words of her own. I'd like an exact translation of it. I hate that the shot was blocked of her aim at Joran. I do hope she got him right between the eyes.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 13, 2008, 03:24:39 PM
Greta/Joran Interview Part 2
snip
VAN SUSTEREN: What's the anger management stuff, though? At some point, correct me if I'm wrong, that you were getting some sort of — you know, that — were you going to some courses or classes or something? Was there a problem with that?
VAN DER SLOOT: No, I never went to any.
VAN SUSTEREN: Nothing like that? Never been an anger issue?
VAN DER SLOOT: No. Never. No.
VAN SUSTEREN: That's just all made up?
VAN DER SLOOT: Yes.
VAN SUSTEREN: Totally — totally fiction?
VAN DER SLOOT: Totally made up.
VAN SUSTEREN: OK.
VAN DER SLOOT: Totally fiction.

 :lol:

 :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: San on January 13, 2008, 03:26:54 PM
I'd like to know what Joran says just after throwing the wine...he turns his head a bit and says something. (I noticed that mostly in the slow motion video)
Also...in HotShots video just as Peter's wife throws water at Joran I can hear words that say...you can forget about being paid now....or something like that. Was that sound from the video or from other background noise at HotShots house??

Nut ... do you have the link to the slow motion video?

Thanks

Janet

Someone has probably already posted...it took me a while to find it...Paulus smiled..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_mqdBSFwpyw

If I was the woman who threw the water back at Joran I would have whipped the glass right at his head.  And let me tell you I throw pretty hard  :-x


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 13, 2008, 03:28:06 PM
I'd like to know what Joran says just after throwing the wine...he turns his head a bit and says something. (I noticed that mostly in the slow motion video)
Also...in HotShots video just as Peter's wife throws water at Joran I can hear words that say...you can forget about being paid now....or something like that. Was that sound from the video or from other background noise at HotShots house??

Nut ... do you have the link to the slow motion video?

Thanks

Janet

Someone has probably already posted...it took me a while to find it...Paulus smiled..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_mqdBSFwpyw

Thanks 2NJ

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 13, 2008, 03:29:10 PM
I put EURoberts full translation of the show into a thread of it's own:

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2522.0


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Anna on January 13, 2008, 03:29:22 PM
Remember Joran told Greta he didn't know what time it was the night Natalee disappeared because he never wore a watch.  He is wearing one in the video as well as below.  There are other photos of him wearing a watch as well.  Just a minor thing to point out the ease with which Joran lies and Greta is inclined to believe him without checking anything.


(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Holloway/33218732_c285bbf15b_m.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: AZSunny on January 13, 2008, 03:32:26 PM
here ya go

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mLyW8zoNU5I

Thanks Hotshot. I could only get audio with the Nova link. I took the video second by second and paused it. I don't see anyone laughing, Sloots or studio staff.
Your Welcome.  I don't think I see them laughing either, but Anita is pretty upset for sure.

Yes, she is and she's turned toward Joran with it. Paulus, too, turns toward Joran. I don't think anyone thought it was funny judging from what I can see in the video.
CBB in the first video we saw, the hosts and paulus appear to be laughing.  Absolutely laughing.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 13, 2008, 03:34:22 PM
I put EURoberts full translation of the show into a thread of it's own:

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2522.0

Thanks you Klaas.

Thank you Robert for translating and sharing.  Incredible job!

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Anna on January 13, 2008, 03:34:46 PM
here ya go

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mLyW8zoNU5I

Thanks Hotshot. I could only get audio with the Nova link. I took the video second by second and paused it. I don't see anyone laughing, Sloots or studio staff.
Your Welcome.  I don't think I see them laughing either, but Anita is pretty upset for sure.

Yes, she is and she's turned toward Joran with it. Paulus, too, turns toward Joran. I don't think anyone thought it was funny judging from what I can see in the video.
CBB in the first video we saw, the hosts and paulus appear to be laughing.  Absolutely laughing.

Yes, that's how it appeared to me as well.  Could have been a frozen smile on Paulus face until it sunk in what he had just seen maybe but is a smile nonetheless.

MO

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 13, 2008, 03:42:36 PM
here ya go

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mLyW8zoNU5I

Thanks Hotshot. I could only get audio with the Nova link. I took the video second by second and paused it. I don't see anyone laughing, Sloots or studio staff.
Your Welcome.  I don't think I see them laughing either, but Anita is pretty upset for sure.

Yes, she is and she's turned toward Joran with it. Paulus, too, turns toward Joran. I don't think anyone thought it was funny judging from what I can see in the video.
CBB in the first video we saw, the hosts and paulus appear to be laughing.  Absolutely laughing.

I thought the same about paulus..at least smirking the sloot smirk


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 13, 2008, 03:44:21 PM
From a few combined posts of Glendas/Julias at RU yesterday and today

Here is what she thinks happened to Natalee >>>

Glenda says:
They knew that they'd never have to pay the reward.

The first reward of $10,000 was to be announced at Sunrise the day after the medjet arrived, you know, the jet that was supposed to be waiting on the tarmac after pulling her out of the drug house. Why would they post a reward after the rescue? Because they knew they'd never have to pay it.

Nail on the head...

I believe they rescued her from a bad situation. It cost a pretty penny and that would be the reason for posting the reward after her recovery. They knew it would never have to be paid and Reward = Airtime = More donations to cover the original amount. Beth had to pay back the Fab 7 for coming up with the cash for the return of her wayward daughter.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 13, 2008, 03:44:48 PM
here ya go

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mLyW8zoNU5I

Thanks Hotshot. I could only get audio with the Nova link. I took the video second by second and paused it. I don't see anyone laughing, Sloots or studio staff.
Your Welcome.  I don't think I see them laughing either, but Anita is pretty upset for sure.

Yes, she is and she's turned toward Joran with it. Paulus, too, turns toward Joran. I don't think anyone thought it was funny judging from what I can see in the video.
CBB in the first video we saw, the hosts and paulus appear to be laughing.  Absolutely laughing.

Yes, that's how it appeared to me as well.  Could have been a frozen smile on Paulus face until it sunk in what he had just seen maybe but is a smile nonetheless.

MO

.

Hey Anna!! Good find on the watch.
I was struck the other day on the posture of paulus...it gave me chills because it appeared to be so like the posture of the man in the video. I thought maybe someone (not me..not good at that stuff!! lol) could do some side by side shots of paulus in the interview and pualus in the casino.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 13, 2008, 03:54:19 PM
Posted by Portia at RU:

portia Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 3:39 pm   

I've been doing some more research for our upcoming cruise that will include a port call in Aruba. Came across this in a cruise review from May, 2007:

I asked our driver, Richard, a native of Aruba, what was the local buzz with regards to the Natalee Holloway disappearance exactly two years ago. He echoed the popular stateside belief that (excuse my spelling) van der Sloot, knows exactly what happened to her and that his judge wanna-be father, had the necessary legal connections to put in the fix with the local authorities. Aruba now has its own O.J. celebrity. He has changed his story on the evening’s events at least eight times. Book him Danno… murder one!!! Richard drove us past the beach next to Natalee’s hotel where he supposedly left her relaxing on the beach at 3 a.m. Gag me with a Smurf, somebody get a rope for this guy, his father and the Kalpo brother accomplices!  


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 13, 2008, 03:56:42 PM
Site meter is getting all kinds of hits from Netherlands, lol.
Utrecht, Utrecht
Arnhem, Gelderland
Thorn, Limburg
Eindhoven, Noord-Brabant
Venlo, Limburg
Leiden, Zuid-Holland
Siddeburen, Groningen
Delft, Zuid-Holland


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 13, 2008, 04:00:40 PM
From a few combined posts of Glendas/Julias at RU yesterday and today

Here is what she thinks happened to Natalee >>>

Glenda says:
They knew that they'd never have to pay the reward.

The first reward of $10,000 was to be announced at Sunrise the day after the medjet arrived, you know, the jet that was supposed to be waiting on the tarmac after pulling her out of the drug house. Why would they post a reward after the rescue? Because they knew they'd never have to pay it.

Nail on the head...

I believe they rescued her from a bad situation. It cost a pretty penny and that would be the reason for posting the reward after her recovery. They knew it would never have to be paid and Reward = Airtime = More donations to cover the original amount. Beth had to pay back the Fab 7 for coming up with the cash for the return of her wayward daughter.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 :roll:

That woman has been spewing her lies from the beginning.  It makes no difference
that she has been proven to be a liar over and over again.  Only the Refugees believe
her and many of them have started to question her.  She just invents and bashes
Beth and Natalee.  It has to be more than the agenda of the AHATA. :-x


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 13, 2008, 04:04:51 PM
From a few combined posts of Glendas/Julias at RU yesterday and today

Here is what she thinks happened to Natalee >>>

Glenda says:
They knew that they'd never have to pay the reward.

The first reward of $10,000 was to be announced at Sunrise the day after the medjet arrived, you know, the jet that was supposed to be waiting on the tarmac after pulling her out of the drug house. Why would they post a reward after the rescue? Because they knew they'd never have to pay it.

Nail on the head...

I believe they rescued her from a bad situation. It cost a pretty penny and that would be the reason for posting the reward after her recovery. They knew it would never have to be paid and Reward = Airtime = More donations to cover the original amount. Beth had to pay back the Fab 7 for coming up with the cash for the return of her wayward daughter.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 :roll:

That woman has been spewing her lies from the beginning.  It makes no difference
that she has been proven to be a liar over and over again.  Only the Refugees believe
her and many of them have started to question her.  She just invents and bashes
Beth and Natalee.  It has to be more than the agenda of the AHATA. :-x

The United States took a huge collective bowel movement expelling Julia from her bowels to Aruba, and never looked back!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 13, 2008, 04:10:41 PM
A bit graphic?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: dennisintn on January 13, 2008, 04:11:55 PM
From a few combined posts of Glendas/Julias at RU yesterday and today

Here is what she thinks happened to Natalee >>>

Glenda says:
They knew that they'd never have to pay the reward.

The first reward of $10,000 was to be announced at Sunrise the day after the medjet arrived, you know, the jet that was supposed to be waiting on the tarmac after pulling her out of the drug house. Why would they post a reward after the rescue? Because they knew they'd never have to pay it.

Nail on the head...

I believe they rescued her from a bad situation. It cost a pretty penny and that would be the reason for posting the reward after her recovery. They knew it would never have to be paid and Reward = Airtime = More donations to cover the original amount. Beth had to pay back the Fab 7 for coming up with the cash for the return of her wayward daughter.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 :roll:

That woman has been spewing her lies from the beginning.  It makes no difference
that she has been proven to be a liar over and over again.  Only the Refugees believe
her and many of them have started to question her.  She just invents and bashes
Beth and Natalee.  It has to be more than the agenda of the AHATA. :-x
i'm more and more inclined to believe julia/glenda was in on the fix from the very beginning.  she gave beth and family way too many bad tips and bad advice from the very start.  she really needs to back off those drug and alcohol mixtures she's evidently pouring down every day.  imho, trash like what comes out of her mind do not come from a sound mind.  particularly since she expects everyone else to believe it like gospel.
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 13, 2008, 04:12:51 PM
From a few combined posts of Glendas/Julias at RU yesterday and today

Here is what she thinks happened to Natalee >>>

Glenda says:
They knew that they'd never have to pay the reward.

The first reward of $10,000 was to be announced at Sunrise the day after the medjet arrived, you know, the jet that was supposed to be waiting on the tarmac after pulling her out of the drug house. Why would they post a reward after the rescue? Because they knew they'd never have to pay it.

Nail on the head...

I believe they rescued her from a bad situation. It cost a pretty penny and that would be the reason for posting the reward after her recovery. They knew it would never have to be paid and Reward = Airtime = More donations to cover the original amount. Beth had to pay back the Fab 7 for coming up with the cash for the return of her wayward daughter.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 :roll:

That woman has been spewing her lies from the beginning.  It makes no difference
that she has been proven to be a liar over and over again.  Only the Refugees believe
her and many of them have started to question her.  She just invents and bashes
Beth and Natalee.  It has to be more than the agenda of the AHATA. :-x

The United States took a huge collective bowel movement expelling Julia from her bowels to Aruba, and never looked back!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

PI,  I think you just said Julia Renfro is a POS. :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 13, 2008, 04:13:40 PM
A bit graphic?

 :lol: Maybe but true  :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 13, 2008, 04:15:25 PM
A bit graphic?

 :lol: Maybe but true  :lol:

My fingers just typed the words with no prompting from my brain, so it must have come from my heart, which is why I just can't apologize for it:((((((((


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 13, 2008, 04:18:23 PM
Yes PI and I like it, lol  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Kiwi on January 13, 2008, 04:18:39 PM
Well there's a chance for the Investigative Psychologist from Holland to review the tape to see where  he was lying to specific questions. At least they will have close ups of his eyes instead of asking questions while he was sleeping during the interrogations. Now you can judge his posture and expressions to the questions. Still a lie detector test on the 2K's would work better than on Joran. You would have to protect the machine from water or wine.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Observer on January 13, 2008, 04:21:36 PM
PI!!  :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 13, 2008, 04:31:58 PM
I think I better watch the Arl vs Al game!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Dayhiker on January 13, 2008, 04:44:31 PM

That woman has been spewing her lies from the beginning.  It makes no difference
that she has been proven to be a liar over and over again.  Only the Refugees believe
her and many of them have started to question her.  She just invents and bashes
Beth and Natalee.  It has to be more than the agenda of the AHATA. :-x


Her audience has gone from a huge national television here in the States to a small blog. Even the Arubans aren't buying:

From the Portia post:


I asked our driver, Richard, a native of Aruba, what was the local buzz with regards to the Natalee Holloway disappearance exactly two years ago. He echoed the popular stateside belief that (excuse my spelling) van der Sloot, knows exactly what happened to her and that his judge wanna-be father, had the necessary legal connections to put in the fix with the local authorities.  Aruba now has its own O.J. celebrity. He has changed his story on the evening’s events at least eight times. Book him Danno… murder one!!! Richard drove us past the beach next to Natalee’s hotel where he supposedly left her relaxing on the beach at 3 a.m. Gag me with a Smurf, somebody get a rope for this guy, his father and the Kalpo brother accomplices!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: crazybabyborg on January 13, 2008, 04:47:19 PM
A bit graphic?

 :lol: :lol: :lol:
Right on the money, PI!  :wink:

As long as we don't have smell-a-vision, you go right ahead and paint a pic with words!  :D

I'll even join you............

(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/JoranToilet.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 13, 2008, 04:49:48 PM
A bit graphic?

 :lol: :lol: :lol:
Right on the money, PI!  :wink:

As long as we don't have smell-a-vision, you go right ahead and paint a pic with words!  :D

I'll even join you............

(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/JoranToilet.jpg)

The birth of Julia Renfroe?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: crazybabyborg on January 13, 2008, 04:51:53 PM
You're killing me, PI! I can't get ahead of you!  :lol: :smt046


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Dayhiker on January 13, 2008, 04:55:58 PM
Greta now has it on her blog:  http://gretawire.foxnews.com/2008/01/13/trouble-in-holland-for-joran/#comments

The Greta who reiterated that she was inclined to believe him?


Judging from the comments at Greta's blog, nobody is "inclined to believe her." Not even a Sloot lover can defend his actions on that Dutch television show. The Joran faithful are conspicuous in their absence.

I one short second he has confirmed to the world that he is the beligerent out-of-control maniac that he's always been suspected of.

I want to see Taco spin this. He can't say Joran is just a kid anymore. He can't say he recommends public assaults. What's a liar-yer to do?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Anna on January 13, 2008, 04:59:13 PM
Has anyone posted Clint van Zandt on this wine throwing episode?

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/22635615#22635615


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: crazybabyborg on January 13, 2008, 04:59:54 PM
Greta now has it on her blog:  http://gretawire.foxnews.com/2008/01/13/trouble-in-holland-for-joran/#comments

The Greta who reiterated that she was inclined to believe him?


Judging from the comments at Greta's blog, nobody is "inclined to believe her." Not even a Sloot lover can defend his actions on that Dutch television show. The Joran faithful are conspicuous in their absence.

I one short second he has confirmed to the world that he is the beligerent out-of-control maniac that he's always been suspected of.

I want to see Taco spin this. He can't say Joran is just a kid anymore. He can't say he recommends public assaults. What's a liar-yer to do?


Oh, Dayhiker, I can already hear it in my ears:

"Well, you know Greta, this boy has lived with these false accusations, been jailed and interrogated over and over again with absolutely no evidence. The frustration level is just unbearable. Frankly, I don't know how he's held up this long .........yada, yada, yada."   :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Dayhiker on January 13, 2008, 05:03:17 PM
Well there's a chance for the Investigative Psychologist from Holland to review the tape to see where  he was lying to specific questions. At least they will have close ups of his eyes instead of asking questions while he was sleeping during the interrogations. Now you can judge his posture and expressions to the questions. Still a lie detector test on the 2K's would work better than on Joran. You would have to protect the machine from water or wine.


Who's left to believe him except Greta, Taco, a few bloggers and a short handful Aruban media types with an agenda? The Dutch are buying, the Arubans aren't buying, the U.S. citizens aren't buying. Paulus ain't buying because he was in on the cover-up (and probably the murder) and Anita knows exactly what happened.

Joran's world is getting smaller and smaller. He must be a pariah on campus. Sooner or later some kook in Holland is going to flip out and put him out of his misery if he doesn't do it to himself first.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Dayhiker on January 13, 2008, 05:06:44 PM

Oh, Dayhiker, I can already hear it in my ears:

"Well, you know Greta, this boy has lived with these false accusations, been jailed and interrogated over and over again with absolutely no evidence. The frustration level is just unbearable. Frankly, I don't know how he's held up this long .........yada, yada, yada."   :roll:


If the Mafia money is still rolling in, CBB. It will be interesting to see if Joe is going to get paid any more now that the case has been dismissed. They must owe him a pile of dough. I would love to see them default on him, lol!

If Joe doesn't show up we'll know the spigot has been shut off.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 13, 2008, 05:08:35 PM
Greta now has it on her blog:  http://gretawire.foxnews.com/2008/01/13/trouble-in-holland-for-joran/#comments

The Greta who reiterated that she was inclined to believe him?


Judging from the comments at Greta's blog, nobody is "inclined to believe her." Not even a Sloot lover can defend his actions on that Dutch television show. The Joran faithful are conspicuous in their absence.

I one short second he has confirmed to the world that he is the beligerent out-of-control maniac that he's always been suspected of.

I want to see Taco spin this. He can't say Joran is just a kid anymore. He can't say he recommends public assaults. What's a liar-yer to do?


I would suggest he crawl back under that rock from whence he came!! He needs to save his credibility for the mob he works for and leave the street punks to fend for themselves. This kid can't even remember his own lies, coordinate his lies with his accomplices, or control himself for an hour long television appearance that was arranged for his benefit to perform a preemptive strike repairing his reputation in anticipation of the Oprah show.

If that big name laywer, a New York Public Relations Firm, Steve Cohen, the Aruban Tourism Authority, one of Aruba's largest newspapers, th Aruban Society of Dirty Dutchmen commonly called frieds of Paulus, the Aruban cleanup crew, organized crime, South American drug lords, and the government of Aruba can't make Joran look good collectively, I suggest they all retire from his service, give him up, and go find some ethical criminal who will appreciate their efforts to protect him. Even a crime boss would lose respect for Joran simply because he is soooooooooo stupid. You can't save a fool from himself.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 13, 2008, 05:10:09 PM
Has anyone posted Clint van Zandt on this wine throwing episode?

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/22635615#22635615

Thanks Anna - I hadn't seen it.  Good interview.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 13, 2008, 05:26:08 PM
Has anyone posted Clint van Zandt on this wine throwing episode?

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/22635615#22635615

Thanks Anna - I hadn't seen it.  Good interview.

I double thank you Anna. That video is certainly making the rounds and bringing at the least unfavorable commentary about Joran. I guess it is a late Christmas present to Beth. Merry Christmas to you to Joran. Thank you very much.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: San on January 13, 2008, 05:28:00 PM
Has anyone posted Clint van Zandt on this wine throwing episode?

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/22635615#22635615

Thanks Anna - I hadn't seen it.  Good interview.

Yes thank you Anna.  I thought you were asking a question if anyone posted to Clint about the incident and didn't realize it was Clint talking about the wine throwing.

I love hearing Clint talk about the case.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: private eye on January 13, 2008, 05:30:22 PM
A bit graphic?

 :lol: :lol: :lol:
Right on the money, PI!  :wink:

As long as we don't have smell-a-vision, you go right ahead and paint a pic with words!  :D

I'll even join you............

(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/JoranToilet.jpg)

The birth of Julia Renfroe?

Oh and that must be Sidalee sitting there looking like Joran!!! You whooo! You hussy, have you no modesty???????????


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: sb on January 13, 2008, 06:04:53 PM
Hi everyone,

When did we first hear of the Joran incident w/DeVries? I looked back in previous pages a little but haven't found that yet.

Also, KLAAS... if you are here... do we have ANY news at all about the LA Dr. Phil/K2 case lately? Still trying to find the "milestones" over the last couple of weeks for posterity's sake  :wink:

I have MISSED you guys! Been VERY busy and had a lot of other computer stuff to do for a while since before Christmas... But I am never far from our Cage!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 13, 2008, 06:05:02 PM
Posted by EURobert on the front page of SM:

Okay, here are some responses to the show, from these pages ( http://pauwenwitteman.vara.nl/uitzending.php?page=1&limit=8&id=274#pagerHeader )

Tribute to Peter
By anonymous
Tribute / Homage to Peter.
I hope very much that Peter will look at this case again, because the story just isn’t right! He has allready proven himself often, if there is someone who can do it than it’s Peter!
(Link to wine-incident)
That kid is outrageous, ‘very good upbringing’. No suprise with such parents.

JvdS3
By Rob
And thank God this man eventually will not be a judge!
Greetings

JvdS
By Rob
Don’t be fooled with this father.
He knows exactly how things go in the judicial system. Look at lawyers, in the end their language is very confusing. And everything is about twisting words; and they can be endlessly twisted.
Peter R de Vries’s intuition may well be the right one.

Truth
By Naatje
Isn’t it the most important to bring the truth to the surface before we accuse someone so heavilly?

Murdered
By Peter Beater
He just murdered that girl

Mr
By d.a.
What a bad performance by the mr’s Pauw & Witteman
What do you mean making agreements/rules
I’m afraid mr. P R de Vries is right
Missed opportunity

Joran
By Luigi
I watched the show of Joran, I have to say don’t let us point a finger to someone else; we are not judges in that sense
And should it ever come out that he knows more about what happened even than we still are no judges.
And I know there are natural laws that punnish even harder. And never has a lie escaped from the truth. It’s sad enough as it is.
And maybe Joran’s grin is insecurity.

Outrageous
By Angelica
I think it’s outrageous that Witteman starts to laugh after the moment Joran threw that wine. That proofs little respect!
Besides that the faces of the VdS-family during the show spoke for themselves.

Unfresh
By p.
The conversation of the VdS-family was done at a exceptional sensational tone. This is no topic to laugh about.
Unsensitive of Pauw & Witteman; in this way they are just a slick popular/peoples-tribunal.

This is not possible
By RobHond
I can’t believee that a 16/17 year old boy can make a girl disappear in such a way that even the most modern equipment can’t find her.
I think from the start that she’s just still alive, maybe in captivity, but she’s not dead.

Spoiled little man
By Gerhard
Look good in his eyes than you can see that he’s bad, his father is a judge-in-training.
That could mean that it’s a spoiled little man that always gets his way.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: JA on January 13, 2008, 06:16:07 PM
As annoying as it is to hear Joran open his mouth, I hope he continues to do interviews and stay in the spotlight.  Sooner or later I see him losing it ( but hopefully not at anyone else's expense)and saying something to further incriminate himself. I want to slap im sill when I see that smug look of his, thinking he is beyond reproach.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Anna on January 13, 2008, 06:22:19 PM
Very nice photo of Peter deVries and his wife Jacqueline someone sent to me.  I do hope she helps Peter remember this incident.  I never find anything involving the eyes amusing at all as they are very fragile and Joran could have cost this man his sight.

She says to Anita something to the effect that I see you have reared him well, being sarcastic in her tone.  I can't translate any better than that for what she said but it was addressed to the mother of the perpetrator of this crime against deVries.  I hope he does press charges just to annoy Joran for this could have been very seriously  Maybe deVries should also sue the hosts of the show for inadequate security when having a dangerous guest like Joran for an interview.

Aren't they a handsome couple unlike some I can think of who were present.

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Holloway/PeterandJacquelinedeVries.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Kat_Gram on January 13, 2008, 06:38:06 PM
Here is a thought :
Did DeVries ever have any contact with the ppl who are on the boat ?
I cannot remember what DeVries thought had happened to Natalee.. he had access to things we never saw nor will ever see.
..
From what I gather, Joran did not incriminate himself, he just showed what a temper he had. And what a fool he is.   


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Anna on January 13, 2008, 06:47:34 PM
KatGram, I would think it would be some sort of assault to douse alcohol into somebody's eyes like that, a crime in and of itself.  But then again, it's The Netherlands so maybe it's legal to do that there?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Hotshot on January 13, 2008, 07:03:30 PM
OK, What does Joran say after he throws the wine, and throws his hands up?  Looks like the last word is bastard.  Could it be poor ole bastard?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Anna on January 13, 2008, 07:05:31 PM
Carpe posted this in the Media Thread, the Fox coverage calling Joran a Jerk.  Can't say I agree with the comments about Greta and what she would have done, however.  I'm not at all sure what she would have done because why should Joran douse Greta since she is inclined to believe him?  He only douses those who contradict him, apparently.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KUkxQlMdo-k


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: WhiskeyGirl on January 13, 2008, 07:07:04 PM
I wonder if Joran misses the limelight?  I wonder if there will be more public episodes that make the news?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: kkate on January 13, 2008, 07:08:36 PM
This story has been played several times today on Toronto's local news station 680 News.
http://www.680news.com/news/international/article.jsp?content=w011323A
It really getting a lot of attention. Not the kind the the VDS's were looking for I'm sure.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: LouiseVargas on January 13, 2008, 07:10:31 PM
From an objective point of view, the pic of Paulus and Anita with baby Joran shows that they are joyous and filled with hope for the future. This pic got me as I have the same pic of myself and my husband and baby Kristi and we were filled with hope, too, not knowing what the future would bring.

Just a thought.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Anna on January 13, 2008, 07:12:25 PM
Saw this at YouTube.  Not sure I even believe in Reverse Speech but the person who made this video evidently does.  It's sort of interesting for those who are into this.  Nothing to do with Coffeepot Ghost, either, but seems to be someone who really believes this is a legitimate method to investigate.  I put it in the same category as Thoughtprints, the Maybe File.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BkE9Qbcw9e8&feature=related


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 13, 2008, 07:13:10 PM
OK, What does Joran say after he throws the wine, and throws his hands up?  Looks like the last word is bastard.  Could it be poor ole bastard?

that is what I read his lips to say "bastard".  Is it pronounced the same in Dutch as in English?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 13, 2008, 07:25:31 PM
Has anyone posted Clint van Zandt on this wine throwing episode?

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/22635615#22635615

Thank you Anna


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 13, 2008, 07:30:02 PM
OK, What does Joran say after he throws the wine, and throws his hands up?  Looks like the last word is bastard.  Could it be poor ole bastard?


I would like to know as well...someone must be able to read lips!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 13, 2008, 07:34:27 PM
A bit graphic?

 :lol: :lol: :lol:
Right on the money, PI!  :wink:

As long as we don't have smell-a-vision, you go right ahead and paint a pic with words!  :D

I'll even join you............

(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/JoranToilet.jpg)

good one CBB!! Man that smirk really irks me!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 13, 2008, 07:35:31 PM
A bit graphic?

 :lol: :lol: :lol:
Right on the money, PI!  :wink:

As long as we don't have smell-a-vision, you go right ahead and paint a pic with words!  :D

I'll even join you............

(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/JoranToilet.jpg)

The birth of Julia Renfroe?

Oh and that must be Sidalee sitting there looking like Joran!!! You whooo! You hussy, have you no modesty???????????

rofl


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 13, 2008, 07:43:05 PM
This story has been played several times today on Toronto's local news station 680 News.
http://www.680news.com/news/international/article.jsp?content=w011323A
It really getting a lot of attention. Not the kind the the VDS's were looking for I'm sure.


I agree.

There is no way that Anita can continue to openly uphold her son in regards to his anger issues.  Joran's total lack of self control ... total lack of a conscience ... was exposed for the world to see.  Maybe ... just maybe ... this event will be the catalyst which will cause this woman to face reality in regards to the path that her son is travelling ... a path that is both a danger to him and ... a danger to others.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 13, 2008, 07:43:08 PM
This is not real  :lol: :lol: :lol:


(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/JoranSlapNew.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 13, 2008, 07:44:39 PM
Has anyone posted Clint van Zandt on this wine throwing episode?

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/22635615#22635615

Thanks Anna - I hadn't seen it.  Good interview.

thanks Anna, great interview,
AAAHHH did anyone notice Anita stuck her hand up her shirt in front of God and everyone to get her microphone off? Could she have just pulled UP on it and then removed it???!!!  Holy crap..this family doesn't have an ounce of class or dignity!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: dennisintn on January 13, 2008, 07:48:03 PM
This story has been played several times today on Toronto's local news station 680 News.
http://www.680news.com/news/international/article.jsp?content=w011323A
It really getting a lot of attention. Not the kind the the VDS's were looking for I'm sure.


I agree.

There is no way that Anita can continue to openly uphold her son in regards to his anger issues.  Joran's total lack of self control ... total lack of a conscience ... was exposed for the world to see.  Maybe ... just maybe ... this event will be the catalyst which will cause this woman to face reality in regards to the path that her son is travelling ... a path that is both a danger to him and ... a danger to others.

Janet
and do not forget what fred maduro said when he was doing the tour of the k.i.a.  he was telling about jvds having a fight with another prisoner, another time having to be subdued by guards because he didn't want to go back down to the police station to be interrogated again, and fred tops it off by saying he'd known jvds all his life and always thought he'd end up where he was(in prison), because of his anger management problems.  just imagine what he'd do to a l00 lb. little girl who refused his alcohol driven sexual advances.
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 13, 2008, 07:52:00 PM
This is not real  :lol: :lol: :lol:


(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/JoranSlapNew.gif)

kinda wish it was..lol


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tylergal on January 13, 2008, 07:58:47 PM
here ya go

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mLyW8zoNU5I

Thanks Hotshot. I could only get audio with the Nova link. I took the video second by second and paused it. I don't see anyone laughing, Sloots or studio staff.
Your Welcome.  I don't think I see them laughing either, but Anita is pretty upset for sure.

Yes, she is and she's turned toward Joran with it. Paulus, too, turns toward Joran. I don't think anyone thought it was funny judging from what I can see in the video.

imo, this was another video from another angle...this is not the same one viewed earlier....Paulus & the one host definitely were smiling when it occurred in the first film.


I agree with you.  I saw it too.  I think someone cleaned it up before they put it "out there."


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tylergal on January 13, 2008, 08:02:35 PM
From a few combined posts of Glendas/Julias at RU yesterday and today

Here is what she thinks happened to Natalee >>>

Glenda says:
They knew that they'd never have to pay the reward.

The first reward of $10,000 was to be announced at Sunrise the day after the medjet arrived, you know, the jet that was supposed to be waiting on the tarmac after pulling her out of the drug house. Why would they post a reward after the rescue? Because they knew they'd never have to pay it.

Nail on the head...

I believe they rescued her from a bad situation. It cost a pretty penny and that would be the reason for posting the reward after her recovery. They knew it would never have to be paid and Reward = Airtime = More donations to cover the original amount. Beth had to pay back the Fab 7 for coming up with the cash for the return of her wayward daughter.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 :roll:

yes, but we have seen what those RUs are doing and we know there are smoke and a pot involved.
2 the WITCH. Fillet of a fenny snake,
In the caldron boil and bake;
EYE OF NEWT, and toe of hog,
Wool of bat, and tongue of dog,
Adder's fork, and blind-worm's sting,
Lizard's leg, and owlet's wing,—
For a charm of powerful trouble,
Like a hell-broth boil and bubble.
ALL. Double, double toil and trouble;
Fire burn, and caldron bubble


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: AZSunny on January 13, 2008, 08:09:25 PM
Has anyone posted Clint van Zandt on this wine throwing episode?

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/22635615#22635615

Thanks Anna - I hadn't seen it.  Good interview.

I agree, great interview, and I am way behind here is this has already been discussed, just ignore me, but what the Hell is Anita doing with her hands up her top???  Hot flash, or boobie flash??  It looks very strange in front of people she does not know personally in a "professional" setting! 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tylergal on January 13, 2008, 08:10:53 PM
OK, What does Joran say after he throws the wine, and throws his hands up?  Looks like the last word is bastard.  Could it be poor ole bastard?

that is what I read his lips to say "bastard".  Is it pronounced the same in Dutch as in English?

are you sure about that?  I thought bastard in English equal joran in Dutch.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Observer on January 13, 2008, 08:21:09 PM
OT

24ora has a article on the the new drive through service at Aruba Bank  :wink:
http://www.24ora.com/content/view/3471/8/
(http://img265.imageshack.us/img265/6259/1storiesnews2008januariac7.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: AZSunny on January 13, 2008, 08:28:27 PM
Has anyone posted Clint van Zandt on this wine throwing episode?

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/22635615#22635615

Thanks Anna - I hadn't seen it.  Good interview.

I agree, great interview, and I am way behind here is this has already been discussed, just ignore me, but what the Hell is Anita doing with her hands up her top???  Hot flash, or boobie flash??  It looks very strange in front of people she does not know personally in a "professional" setting! 

Oh, I see lou said Microphone removal... that is weird, there must be a better way!  She looks like she is fanning her boobies to me!! I thought she was hot under the lights!  LOL


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: LilPuma on January 13, 2008, 08:29:29 PM
This is not real  :lol: :lol: :lol:


(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/JoranSlapNew.gif)

kinda wish it was..lol

Figuratively speaking, it is.  I would sort of like to see Red or Robots or a few of the Monkey Boys and Girls actually walking behind him somewhere, saying and doing nothing except wearing their monkey shirts.  Throw in Dana with his handcuffs and a monkey shirt.   :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 13, 2008, 08:34:47 PM
OT

24ora has a article on the the new drive through service at Aruba Bank  :wink:
http://www.24ora.com/content/view/3471/8/
(http://img265.imageshack.us/img265/6259/1storiesnews2008januariac7.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)


 :lol: :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: LilPuma on January 13, 2008, 08:35:15 PM
Looking at some of the still shots of Joran, he looks like he had too much to drink or didn't sleep well.  I doubt he was studying too hard.  I think he might be saying this in that last frame: 

Ik doodde de hond. Ik doodde het meisje.

Translation:  I killed the dog.  I killed the girl. 

I, for one, would hang him for the dog.  After Natalee, I'd put his hand in his pocket too. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 13, 2008, 08:37:33 PM
OK, What does Joran say after he throws the wine, and throws his hands up?  Looks like the last word is bastard.  Could it be poor ole bastard?

that is what I read his lips to say "bastard".  Is it pronounced the same in Dutch as in English?

are you sure about that?  I thought bastard in English equal joran in Dutch.

You are correct. I forgot Joran=bastard :lol: :lol: :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 13, 2008, 08:38:43 PM
From a few combined posts of Glendas/Julias at RU yesterday and today

Here is what she thinks happened to Natalee >>>

Glenda says:
They knew that they'd never have to pay the reward.

The first reward of $10,000 was to be announced at Sunrise the day after the medjet arrived, you know, the jet that was supposed to be waiting on the tarmac after pulling her out of the drug house. Why would they post a reward after the rescue? Because they knew they'd never have to pay it.

Nail on the head...

I believe they rescued her from a bad situation. It cost a pretty penny and that would be the reason for posting the reward after her recovery. They knew it would never have to be paid and Reward = Airtime = More donations to cover the original amount. Beth had to pay back the Fab 7 for coming up with the cash for the return of her wayward daughter.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 :roll:

yes, but we have seen what those RUs are doing and we know there are smoke and a pot involved.
2 the WITCH. Fillet of a fenny snake,
In the caldron boil and bake;
EYE OF NEWT, and toe of hog,
Wool of bat, and tongue of dog, Siddalee?
Adder's fork, and blind-worm's sting,
Lizard's leg, and owlet's wing,—
For a charm of powerful trouble,
Like a hell-broth boil and bubble.
ALL. Double, double toil and trouble;
Fire burn, and caldron bubble


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 13, 2008, 08:42:42 PM
Can't wait for Jossy'ds response to the wine episode  :D


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 13, 2008, 08:49:55 PM
50  :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 13, 2008, 08:51:04 PM
This is not real  :lol: :lol: :lol:


(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/JoranSlapNew.gif)

kinda wish it was..lol


Looks real to me  :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Kat_Gram on January 13, 2008, 08:52:05 PM
KatGram, I would think it would be some sort of assault to douse alcohol into somebody's eyes like that, a crime in and of itself.  But then again, it's The Netherlands so maybe it's legal to do that there?
Oh, I think it is a crime anywhere, but P DeVries would have to make a complaint.
I for one would like Joran to be found guilty of anything. In a court room.
If DeVries had done that, the Sloots would sue. 
Civil suit ? I don't think they are as prone as we are in NA to do so.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 13, 2008, 08:52:12 PM
I think that monkey is hitting below the belt  :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: San on January 13, 2008, 08:52:31 PM
50  :cool:

 :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 13, 2008, 08:55:01 PM
I think that monkey is hitting below the belt  :lol:

GOOD! I hope he kicks him too!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tylergal on January 13, 2008, 08:56:32 PM
Thanks for bringing the MSNBC/Cliff VanZ video over.   Now, tell me Paulus was not laughing along with the host, Anita appearing surprised while no one rushed to this poor man's aide.  It makes one wonder who are the real troglodytes.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: AZSunny on January 13, 2008, 08:57:50 PM
I think that monkey is hitting below the belt  :lol:

Klaas,  I think you are missing the great opportunity to screen capture that picture with Anita pulling out and up her shirt.  it is bizarre in my mind.  By the way,  I have worn microphones, and that is not needed to remove one that has been hidden in your clothes.  I think she was trying to cool herself.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 13, 2008, 08:58:19 PM
I wish that one would play for me.....but it won't  :sad:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 13, 2008, 08:59:10 PM
Has anyone posted Clint van Zandt on this wine throwing episode?

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/22635615#22635615

Thanks Anna - I hadn't seen it.  Good interview.

I agree, great interview, and I am way behind here is this has already been discussed, just ignore me, but what the Hell is Anita doing with her hands up her top???  Hot flash, or boobie flash??  It looks very strange in front of people she does not know personally in a "professional" setting! 

Oh, I see lou said Microphone removal... that is weird, there must be a better way!  She looks like she is fanning her boobies to me!! I thought she was hot under the lights!  LOL

I think that Anita actions in regards to the top of her outfit implies that she must have gotten splashed with some of that wine that Joran threw at Devries.

IMO

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: AZSunny on January 13, 2008, 08:59:21 PM
I wish that one would play for me.....but it won't  :sad:

I wish you could see it...are we at 50 yet?????????


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #711 1/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 13, 2008, 08:59:33 PM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/1LOCKED.gif)

Please move to NCD# 712

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2523.0