Scared Monkeys Discussion Forum

Natalee Holloway => LCD Archive => Topic started by: klaasend on March 03, 2008, 02:15:38 AM



Title: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 - 3/5/08
Post by: klaasend on March 03, 2008, 02:15:38 AM
http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/Natalee2.swf


JUSTICE FOR NATALEE


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: AZLady on March 03, 2008, 12:17:10 PM
Good morning, Monkeys!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Anna on March 03, 2008, 12:32:28 PM
Old Fart...the Persistence has left Aruba as of this morning at 8:20AM according to LegallyLex at BFN.... there are pictures of the boat leaving but they asked for them not to be moved off the site...  ::MonkeyShocked::


Yes, I just read that over there. Well, it won't be long before those photos will be all over...starting with RU, I'll bet. Hell, 1/2 of RU are members at BFN and BNH. How do they expect those photos to stay there :roll: . I won't take them, but we all know MANY from RU and BNH sure will!!

What a way to promote a DONATION. This is ridiculous, like BFN are the only ones that cared, supported and have donated?


So Kyle is sort of a cabin boy?


I was catching up this morning and came across the above post and found it odd that it was asked the pics not leave BFN as IF  no one but BFN members are the only ones that care, have supported, donated, spent endless hours..etc ..on and on.

It's just odd to me that the pics of the Persistence photos leaving Aruba have been requested to stay on BFN.



Sounds like of like a deliberate snub, doesn't it?

Well, I'm just not going to be offended anyway.  Their frustration level had to be off the chart.  Maybe Kyle will give us some explanation when he gets home and rested up.  Will withhold judgment until then.

And even if he doesn't, we are all on the same team.  And Tim Miller was a part of that search and I know he would never want to do anything to snub the Monkeys.

They all still have my gratitude and prayers and wishes for a return to finish the search if it is deemed likely to find Natalee.

We have to be uniters and not dividers and all the supporters of Natalee's family must pull together even if we don't always agree on things and I mean the search crew and BFN as well as any supporters anywhere.

It's still about Natalee for me, egos be damned no matter whose they are.  I'm here now basically for Beth, to be perfectly candid.  I don't really care what games they play with pictures anyway.  They gave months of their lives and I love them for that no matter what else they may do.


jmoo


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Anna on March 03, 2008, 12:35:46 PM
Oh, WoW!

I just learned how to bring a post from one thread to another!  Usually I just lose my whole post and get caught in the cage door when it changes.

First time I was ever successful at doing this.  Of course, it has to be so simple if I can do it, just copy and paste basically but I didn't know it could be done before.


Now I have to work so can watch the second part of the program tonight if it is still on schedule.

Working and lurking

. . . .


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: martini on March 03, 2008, 12:45:46 PM
(http://i235.photobucket.com/albums/ee69/buxtehudeoma/SMILEY/police/ball-chain.gif)   ::MonkeyShocked::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Destiny on March 03, 2008, 12:49:31 PM
Last 2 posts from previous thread...

Destiny   
Scared Monkey
*
Online

Posts: 967


View Profile
   
   
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #738 3/1 - 3/3/08
« Reply #980 on: Today at 12:12:35 PM »
   Reply with quote
Quote from: Rob on Today at 11:05:34 AM
The killing of a terrorist is not a reason to go to war, and it's quite obvious Chavez is hankerin' for a fight. This excursion to kill the terrorist has nothing to do with Venezuela.

Now whether Chavez wants to try out his new hardware or he has other ideas about the region will be known shortly. He will either follow through on his proclamations or he will back down and lose face among the socialist that are his supporters.

I think he will lose his new hardware in prompt fashion should he engage one of our allies. Chavez is reckless and he's going to put the people in Venezuela in a very very bad position.

No matter how you slice and dice this situation, it doesn't look good.

Morning Rob..and all Monkeys!

Couldn't agree with you more...I also see this a a bid Karma nail in Aruba's coffin...who would even want to vacation, much less buy property in a beach front *war* zone....I can see it now...next to the Holiday Inn...a nice big tent city of refugees.

Tourism has taken a *huge* blow with the current state of affaires....too bad Aruba...you are reaping what you have sown...
   Report to moderator   71.28.41.49
I Stand With The Girl *NATALEE HOLLOWAY*

Aruba Beware *AN ANGEL LIKE NO OTHER* has fallen amongst you....may you know the fury of HEAVEN!
AZLady
Scared Monkey
*
Online

Posts: 3283


View Profile
   
   
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #738 3/1 - 3/3/08
« Reply #981 on: Today at 12:15:19 PM »
   Reply with quote
You are so right, Destiny.  As if the Holloway case didn't turn their tourism downwards, now it appears that Chavez might just finish the job and flush it.  Who would go to an island so close to a war zone?  This will finish them and they'll be opening all those hotel rooms to South American refugees.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Destiny on March 03, 2008, 12:53:26 PM
Guess I'll need Anna to show me how to properly bring a post forward from the last thread...I always screw it up  ::MonkeyWaa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 03, 2008, 12:54:58 PM
"Field Project Manager, Geophysical Engineer and Marine Geologist on board the R/V Persistence. Responsible for side scan sonar acquisition, digital processing, analysis, and target identification and location. I will assist in side scan sonar operation and guide the ROV (remotely operated vehicle) team to each sonar target after I pick and analyse each sonar target."

http://geosolutions.blogspot.com/

Hardly a cabin boy.

I do not doubt for one minute that Kyle is very qualified in his profession ... I do not doubt for one minute that Kyle motives in locating the remains of Natalee Hollway were very sincere.

However ... somewhere along the way Kyle was influenced to believe that those within the Aruban investigation were the "good guys" and ... the media which was the sole reason that the Natalee Holloway case did not become a faded memory was the "bad guy".

The following post spoke volumes to me in regards to Kyle naïveté in regards to the dynamics encompassing the "powers that be" in the Aruban investigation who have been behind the coverup which has been denying Natalee Holloway justice.

I cannot comprehend that Kyle would have posted the following words if he had done his homework.  If only he had read Dave Holloway's ... Corruption in Paradise or ... Beth Holloway's ... Loving Natalee.

In November, 2005 ... Dave Holloway conceded that his cooperation with the enemy had not worked.  Dave learned that his goal for justice to prevail for his precious daughter did not reflect ... the Aruban goal to distance Joran and Paulus from implication.

Janet

++++++++

oceanexploration
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #715 1/25 -
« Reply #103 on: January 26, 2008, 12:38:25 PM »


Thought you all may find this interesting if you're willing to accept it-

To date, the Aruban police and dive team has been a tremendous help.  They've honestly done a great job. Over the last month we've established a very good working relationship based on openness and trust.  Most of the relationship success was due to getting the media out of the way and working together shoulder to shoulder over time.  We've helped each other however and whenever we can.  They've treated us with decency and respect and we have treated them as friends and allies, which they are. Most of the police and divers are new since this case started and both eager and careful to do things right.  I wish we had a month ahead of the project just to establish the relationships and trust. I know many of you would likely doubt this view, but it's based on the experiences in the field of the entire search team. I too was extremely worried, paranoid, and suspecting in the beginning.  Now, it's clear we're all working towards a common goal.


Dave Holloway
On the Record w/ Greta
November 17, 2005


HOLLOWAY: ... I made sure that the prime minister understood our position. You know, I had been holding off on this boycott as long as I could, and I told him, I said, you know, The big wave is coming, and if you guys are not going to listen, I can't help you anymore.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,175925,00.html


Dave Holloway
On the Record w/ Greta
April 11, 2006


HOLLOWAY: Oh, the media was our best friend. If it hadn't been for the media this thing would have been swept under the table the very first day and we'd have been calling back to Aruba "Have you heard anything? Have you heard anything?" I truly believe that.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,191377,00.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: private eye on March 03, 2008, 12:56:05 PM
Old Fart...the Persistence has left Aruba as of this morning at 8:20AM according to LegallyLex at BFN.... there are pictures of the boat leaving but they asked for them not to be moved off the site...  ::MonkeyShocked::


Yes, I just read that over there. Well, it won't be long before those photos will be all over...starting with RU, I'll bet. Hell, 1/2 of RU are members at BFN and BNH. How do they expect those photos to stay there :roll: . I won't take them, but we all know MANY from RU and BNH sure will!!

What a way to promote a DONATION. This is ridiculous, like BFN are the only ones that cared, supported and have donated?


So Kyle is sort of a cabin boy?


I was catching up this morning and came across the above post and found it odd that it was asked the pics not leave BFN as IF  no one but BFN members are the only ones that care, have supported, donated, spent endless hours..etc ..on and on.

It's just odd to me that the pics of the Persistence photos leaving Aruba have been requested to stay on BFN.



Sounds like of like a deliberate snub, doesn't it?

Well, I'm just not going to be offended anyway.  Their frustration level had to be off the chart.  Maybe Kyle will give us some explanation when he gets home and rested up.  Will withhold judgment until then.

And even if he doesn't, we are all on the same team.  And Tim Miller was a part of that search and I know he would never want to do anything to snub the Monkeys.

They all still have my gratitude and prayers and wishes for a return to finish the search if it is deemed likely to find Natalee.

We have to be uniters and not dividers and all the supporters of Natalee's family must pull together even if we don't always agree on things and I mean the search crew and BFN as well as any supporters anywhere.

It's still about Natalee for me, egos be damned no matter whose they are.  I'm here now basically for Beth, to be perfectly candid.  I don't really care what games they play with pictures anyway.  They gave months of their lives and I love them for that no matter what else they may do.


jmoo

I am with you 100%. I do hope they get out of there before any hostility breaks out. The boat did have some amazing capabilities and the owner was extremely generous.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: AZLady on March 03, 2008, 01:01:30 PM
Tamikosmom, I agree.  Kyle was shocked at the information in the TNI report that we all digested 3 years ago.  He is a scientist and takes things at face value. The Arubans are quite good at presenting one attitude to your face and another behind your back.  We have also learned that over the past 3 years.  I think his youth and lack of experience with people like the ALE and the internet bloggers caused him to misinterpret motivations and actions.  Youth and inexperience are easily cured with time.  He was a valuable member of the search team, and I forgive him his assumptions.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: SunnyinTX on March 03, 2008, 01:07:12 PM
O/T BREAKING NEWS

REPORT: SEVEN SHOT AT WENDY'S NEAR WEST PALM BEACH, FLA.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: cubbeegirl on March 03, 2008, 01:10:01 PM
O/T BREAKING NEWS

REPORT: SEVEN SHOT AT WENDY'S NEAR WEST PALM BEACH, FLA.



Dear Lord, is there no end to the madness?

Hey Sunny!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: SunnyinTX on March 03, 2008, 01:14:21 PM
O/T BREAKING NEWS

REPORT: SEVEN SHOT AT WENDY'S NEAR WEST PALM BEACH, FLA.



Dear Lord, is there no end to the madness?

Hey Sunny!

Hi Cubbee.....madness is correct!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 03, 2008, 01:14:22 PM
I speculate that furor over the internet images taken by the crew of the  Persistance of the contents of that enormous cage/trap has everything to do with those images NOT having anything to do with the Natalee Holloway case.

Maybe ... just maybe ... those images should never have been released by the Persistance ... as they would become part of a new Aruban investigation.

I suspect that these images were shared with Robin H. but ... were never expected to surface on the internet.

IMO

Janet

++++++++++++

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2654.msg357200#msg357200

Oceanexploration
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #736 2/27 -
« Reply #525 on: February 29, 2008, 02:58:40 AM »


I really didn't want to respond to all this but I feel I must. 

Please stop...and carefully think things through here.  You know who I mean.

WHAT do you think you are doing?  What do you seriously think you are going to accomplish with the pics?  Don't you even think to consider for a second that we the search team, who found the trap, supervised it's sampling, recorded that video and others... are ensuring the situation is in proper hands and being taken care of appropriately and completely?   

You are not helping anything by interfering with what you do not fully understand.  Please let the authorities do their jobs without interference.   

Robin should never have posted those pics because of the stir they would cause.  She trusted (mistakenly) people's ethics on a private forum.  One of the reasons (among many) that this case has taken so long to solve is because of the Internet, media, and well intended partially-informed people's ambitions and agendas.  Stay out of business you don't belong in.  You all know I am an ally both in the field and on the net.  I have done my best to both bring success to this case and to keep people informed and updated with what information should be provided.  We the search team have worked extremely hard over a long time.  Many of you have as well.  Let's not let our frustrations get the best of us.  Let us not let our emotions interfere with what we know to be true, and let us not forget who we are and what jobs we have to do.  Let those who are responsible do their jobs.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Peaches on March 03, 2008, 01:17:57 PM
Tamikosmom, I agree.  Kyle was shocked at the information in the TNI report that we all digested 3 years ago.  He is a scientist and takes things at face value. The Arubans are quite good at presenting one attitude to your face and another behind your back.  We have also learned that over the past 3 years.  I think his youth and lack of experience with people like the ALE and the internet bloggers caused him to misinterpret motivations and actions.  Youth and inexperience are easily cured with time.  He was a valuable member of the search team, and I forgive him his assumptions.

Bless his heart.  He can't help it he hasn't been on this earth as long as some of the rest of us.  I'd like to read some of his other blogs in my spare time.  I found Kyle to be very interesting.  I believe he will do well in his chosen field. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: cubbeegirl on March 03, 2008, 01:21:12 PM
Tamikosmom, I agree.  Kyle was shocked at the information in the TNI report that we all digested 3 years ago.  He is a scientist and takes things at face value. The Arubans are quite good at presenting one attitude to your face and another behind your back.  We have also learned that over the past 3 years.  I think his youth and lack of experience with people like the ALE and the internet bloggers caused him to misinterpret motivations and actions.  Youth and inexperience are easily cured with time.  He was a valuable member of the search team, and I forgive him his assumptions.

Bless his heart.  He can't help it he hasn't been on this earth as long as some of the rest of us.  I'd like to read some of his other blogs in my spare time.  I found Kyle to be very interesting.  I believe he will do well in his chosen field. 


HEy Peaches! I agree!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: private eye on March 03, 2008, 01:26:56 PM
Peaches

I didn't mean to offend you with my teasing of Kyle. I know he is a professional who is well educated, accomplished, and skilled. I have thanked him profusely and sincerely. I simply thought a little good natured teasing was in order. I am sorry if it offended you and or Kyle. My words weren't designed to reprimand, belittle, blame, or hurt him, and if they did I sincerely apologize. He is a great guy in my book.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: AZLady on March 03, 2008, 01:27:20 PM
I agree, also.  Kyle did a wonderful job keeping us updated on the search and educating all of us about the equipment used in the search. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Anna on March 03, 2008, 01:28:16 PM
Well, here's certainly some wonderful news.  Bet Carpe can capture it for us, too!



http://www.telegraaf.nl/binnenland/3456742/_Moeder_Natalee__te_gast_bij_Jensen__.html?p=1,2
 
Moeder Natalee Holloway te gast bij Jensen

HILVERSUM - Beth Twitty, de moeder van op de Aruba verdwenen tiener Natalee Holloway, is dinsdagavond te gast in het televisieprogramma Jensen!. Voor het eerst na de spraakmakende uitzending van Peter R. de Vries geeft ze op de Nederlandse televisie haar reactie op de bekentenissen van Joran van der Sloot, aldus RTL maandag.

Beth Twitty the mother of missing teenager Natalee Holloway. will be Tuesday as guest in TV show Jensen. For the first time after the show from Peter R. de Vries she gives to  Dutch TV a reaction to the confession from Joran van der Sloot, said RTL monday.


Tegen presentator Robert Jensen vertelt ze over de schadeclaim die ze gaat indien bij Joran van der Sloot wegens de emotionele schade die ze heeft geleden. Ook gaat ze in op de gebeurtenissen nadat de mediagekte losbarstte en de zoektocht naar haar dochter, die op 30 mei 2005 verdween.

She wukk talk to announcer Robert Jensen about the civil lawsuit against Joran van der Sloot, what he has done emotionally to her. Also she will be talking about the media that is following the case and about the search to her daughter, that was missing on May 30, 2005.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Het beste van Windows, nu ook online. Deel jouw wereld met Windows Live. Download nu.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: flyer33716 on March 03, 2008, 01:28:59 PM
ok I may be tarred and feathered for this. The USA spends billions on a fight against drugs that can not be won. We have overflowing prisons, mass murders and a missing Natalie which is in some way related to Illegal narcotics. The simple and easiest way to control these substances are to legalize them and tax the crap out of it. Spend the tax dollars on rehabilitaion. Take the glamour away from using illegal narcotics. This would clean this country and all of the corrupt governments up. Just my opinion. I am sorry that I posted this here. Ok heat up the tar and I have the feathers


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: private eye on March 03, 2008, 01:29:19 PM
Tamikosmom, I agree.  Kyle was shocked at the information in the TNI report that we all digested 3 years ago.  He is a scientist and takes things at face value. The Arubans are quite good at presenting one attitude to your face and another behind your back.  We have also learned that over the past 3 years.  I think his youth and lack of experience with people like the ALE and the internet bloggers caused him to misinterpret motivations and actions.  Youth and inexperience are easily cured with time.  He was a valuable member of the search team, and I forgive him his assumptions.

Bless his heart.  He can't help it he hasn't been on this earth as long as some of the rest of us.  I'd like to read some of his other blogs in my spare time.  I found Kyle to be very interesting.  I believe he will do well in his chosen field. 


HEy Peaches! I agree!!!!

He already is excelling in his field.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: AZLady on March 03, 2008, 01:30:10 PM
PI, I do think knowing some background helps to understand the posts Kyle made.  As you said before, you had assumed he was the owner of the boat.  Knowing who made the posts helps us to better interpret his meaning and intentions.  I usually always ascribe good intentions unless I'm shown otherwise.  I'll miss the regular updates.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: AZLady on March 03, 2008, 01:32:07 PM
So, I guess we are back to waiting and watching and wondering, again. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: NM on March 03, 2008, 01:35:52 PM
CAPS  Thank you for the info and summary of the telearuba program last night.  thank you also for all info, translations, etc.  I am really glad you are here and a Monkey. Thank you!!!!

JackB I think you ask what is "bogart a spliff"  bogart is when you either take a really long, hard drag of a tobacco like product and/or you hang onto the tobaaco like product for a long time, not allowing others to share.  Spliff or blunt is a part tobacco, part weed cigarrette.

Jo-ann I think you posted about friends of jurin's currently posting that his 2 younger brothers where in Netherlands with avds.  THANK YOU FOR THAT INFO!!!!!!  Many of us here were given that same info in June 2005 by people in aruba and not friends of the people of the ditch (love that name!).  Also a Monkey found out that 3 people of the ditch (3 van der sloots) flew from nl to aruba the day avds said she came home around June 1.  IMO, pvds needed his younger sons home for an alibi and that is when that story change.  Thanks again for posting that info.


Welcome all new and newish Monkeys.  It is so great to have you all here.


******* sorry for the loss of you 2 beloved pets.  PS I don't have the ability to differentiate between animal types. So the loss of a dog, cat is a much as a human to me.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Destiny on March 03, 2008, 01:36:41 PM
I speculate that furor over the internet images taken by the crew of the  Persistance of the contents of that enormous cage/trap has everything to do with those images NOT having anything to do with the Natalee Holloway case.

Maybe ... just maybe ... those images should never have been released by the Persistance ... as they would become part of a new Aruban investigation.

I suspect that these images were shared with Robin H. but ... were never expected to surface on the internet.

IMO

Janet

++++++++++++

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2654.msg357200#msg357200

Oceanexploration
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #736 2/27 -
« Reply #525 on: February 29, 2008, 02:58:40 AM »


I really didn't want to respond to all this but I feel I must. 

Please stop...and carefully think things through here.  You know who I mean.

WHAT do you think you are doing?  What do you seriously think you are going to accomplish with the pics?  Don't you even think to consider for a second that we the search team, who found the trap, supervised it's sampling, recorded that video and others... are ensuring the situation is in proper hands and being taken care of appropriately and completely?   

You are not helping anything by interfering with what you do not fully understand.  Please let the authorities do their jobs without interference.   

Robin should never have posted those pics because of the stir they would cause.  She trusted (mistakenly) people's ethics on a private forum.  One of the reasons (among many) that this case has taken so long to solve is because of the Internet, media, and well intended partially-informed people's ambitions and agendas.  Stay out of business you don't belong in.  You all know I am an ally both in the field and on the net.  I have done my best to both bring success to this case and to keep people informed and updated with what information should be provided.  We the search team have worked extremely hard over a long time.  Many of you have as well.  Let's not let our frustrations get the best of us.  Let us not let our emotions interfere with what we know to be true, and let us not forget who we are and what jobs we have to do.  Let those who are responsible do their jobs.

Janet...

When OE posted this...I did...and still wonder if it was directed at me.  It was during the heated conversations over the photos...and if one could be used for info gathering...then a certain long term Monkey racked me over the coals in her rant fest about the photo issue...it really struck a raw nerve with me...due to the fact, that everytime I had any *personal* dealings with anyone in Aruba...they always trotted out the *mantra* about the iinvestigation being hampered by the media..and the Holloway Family...

I almost felt betrayed by OE...and I had to take a big step backwards to reevaluate my involvement as a Monkey...wondering if I *did* do something wrong in forging ahead...as is my fashion...

But, in stepping back...I was able to see the frustration of OE...how hard it must be for him too...everyone wanting answers *now*...when he was basically a new kid on the block in a 3 year debacle.  It must have been such a strain on him...Bless him and the rest of the crew for what they did manage to do...with so many looking over their shoulders...some looking with hope...some looking with fear...what a quagmire for OE to deal with...JMOO rambles..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: klaasend on March 03, 2008, 01:38:02 PM
Posted by HannieC at RU:

BTW, just read in the paper that Beth is on the Jensen show tomorrow again, pffff........   

She is going to tell Jensen how she is going to sue Joran for emotional suffering..............

I thought that wasn't true??? 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: private eye on March 03, 2008, 01:41:01 PM
Posted by HannieC at RU:

BTW, just read in the paper that Beth is on the Jensen show tomorrow again, pffff........   

She is going to tell Jensen how she is going to sue Joran for emotional suffering..............

I thought that wasn't true??? 


I knew she was going to go there for a late night talk show, and I imagine she is trying  to get into a position whereby if Joran successfully sues Peter, then she will try and take whatever he gets. JMO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: AZLady on March 03, 2008, 01:43:49 PM
Posted by HannieC at RU:

BTW, just read in the paper that Beth is on the Jensen show tomorrow again, pffff........   

She is going to tell Jensen how she is going to sue Joran for emotional suffering..............

I thought that wasn't true??? 

I read something similar at BFN--that Beth would be on Jensen in Netherlands tomorrow.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Jo-An on March 03, 2008, 01:43:59 PM
Jo-ann I think you posted about friends of jurin's currently posting that his 2 younger brothers where in Netherlands with avds.  THANK YOU FOR THAT INFO!!!!!!  Many of us here were given that same info in June 2005 by people in aruba and not friends of the people of the ditch (love that name!).  Also a Monkey found out that 3 people of the ditch (3 van der sloots) flew from nl to aruba the day avds said she came home around June 1.  IMO, pvds needed his younger sons home for an alibi and that is when that story change.  Thanks again for posting that info.

Nope, that wasn't me!  ::MonkeyNoNo::
Don't know who it was though...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Destiny on March 03, 2008, 01:44:51 PM
ok I may be tarred and feathered for this. The USA spends billions on a fight against drugs that can not be won. We have overflowing prisons, mass murders and a missing Natalie which is in some way related to Illegal narcotics. The simple and easiest way to control these substances are to legalize them and tax the crap out of it. Spend the tax dollars on rehabilitaion. Take the glamour away from using illegal narcotics. This would clean this country and all of the corrupt governments up. Just my opinion. I am sorry that I posted this here. Ok heat up the tar and I have the feathers

Well...give me those feathers...I'll make a pillow for you ;-)

I tend to agree with what you have posted...*if*..and that's a pretty big if...it were done properly...with out the Drug Lords involved...it would solve many social issues...

The way things are now is a lose..lose..situation.  Time has proven, that trying to empty an ocean with a straw doesn't work...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: private eye on March 03, 2008, 01:45:06 PM
PI, I do think knowing some background helps to understand the posts Kyle made.  As you said before, you had assumed he was the owner of the boat.  Knowing who made the posts helps us to better interpret his meaning and intentions.  I usually always ascribe good intentions unless I'm shown otherwise.  I'll miss the regular updates.

I will too. The search was fascinating


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Anna on March 03, 2008, 01:46:38 PM
Well, here's certainly some wonderful news.  Bet Carpe can capture it for us, too!



http://www.telegraaf.nl/binnenland/3456742/_Moeder_Natalee__te_gast_bij_Jensen__.html?p=1,2
 
Moeder Natalee Holloway te gast bij Jensen

HILVERSUM - Beth Twitty, de moeder van op de Aruba verdwenen tiener Natalee Holloway, is dinsdagavond te gast in het televisieprogramma Jensen!. Voor het eerst na de spraakmakende uitzending van Peter R. de Vries geeft ze op de Nederlandse televisie haar reactie op de bekentenissen van Joran van der Sloot, aldus RTL maandag.

Beth Twitty the mother of missing teenager Natalee Holloway. will be Tuesday as guest in TV show Jensen. For the first time after the show from Peter R. de Vries she gives to  Dutch TV a reaction to the confession from Joran van der Sloot, said RTL monday.


Tegen presentator Robert Jensen vertelt ze over de schadeclaim die ze gaat indien bij Joran van der Sloot wegens de emotionele schade die ze heeft geleden. Ook gaat ze in op de gebeurtenissen nadat de mediagekte losbarstte en de zoektocht naar haar dochter, die op 30 mei 2005 verdween.

She wukk talk to announcer Robert Jensen about the civil lawsuit against Joran van der Sloot, what he has done emotionally to her. Also she will be talking about the media that is following the case and about the search to her daughter, that was missing on May 30, 2005.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Het beste van Windows, nu ook online. Deel jouw wereld met Windows Live. Download nu.



Well!!!  Didn't any of you read my post???  I was very proud of my little find.

 ::MonkeyShocked:: ::MonkeyNoNo:: ::MonkeyShocked::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: AZLady on March 03, 2008, 01:48:19 PM
oops.  Anna, I have to confess I missed your post.  I'm sorry.  I've been working and lurking, no excuse.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: AZLady on March 03, 2008, 01:49:51 PM
I'm so glad Beth is keeping the case in the Dutch media.  I think perhaps the only justice, if any, will come from the Dutch.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: klaasend on March 03, 2008, 01:50:12 PM
Well, here's certainly some wonderful news.  Bet Carpe can capture it for us, too!



http://www.telegraaf.nl/binnenland/3456742/_Moeder_Natalee__te_gast_bij_Jensen__.html?p=1,2
 
Moeder Natalee Holloway te gast bij Jensen

HILVERSUM - Beth Twitty, de moeder van op de Aruba verdwenen tiener Natalee Holloway, is dinsdagavond te gast in het televisieprogramma Jensen!. Voor het eerst na de spraakmakende uitzending van Peter R. de Vries geeft ze op de Nederlandse televisie haar reactie op de bekentenissen van Joran van der Sloot, aldus RTL maandag.

Beth Twitty the mother of missing teenager Natalee Holloway. will be Tuesday as guest in TV show Jensen. For the first time after the show from Peter R. de Vries she gives to  Dutch TV a reaction to the confession from Joran van der Sloot, said RTL monday.


Tegen presentator Robert Jensen vertelt ze over de schadeclaim die ze gaat indien bij Joran van der Sloot wegens de emotionele schade die ze heeft geleden. Ook gaat ze in op de gebeurtenissen nadat de mediagekte losbarstte en de zoektocht naar haar dochter, die op 30 mei 2005 verdween.

She wukk talk to announcer Robert Jensen about the civil lawsuit against Joran van der Sloot, what he has done emotionally to her. Also she will be talking about the media that is following the case and about the search to her daughter, that was missing on May 30, 2005.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Het beste van Windows, nu ook online. Deel jouw wereld met Windows Live. Download nu.



Well!!!  Didn't any of you read my post???  I was very proud of my little find.

 ::MonkeyShocked:: ::MonkeyNoNo:: ::MonkeyShocked::

Anna - sorry, I did miss your post, I was working and must have skipped by it.  Great find.  Here's the google translation:

{{edit because I'm trying to do too many things at once, LOL  ::MonkeyHaHa::}}


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: klaasend on March 03, 2008, 01:53:26 PM
OK...that proves it...I need to go back to work  ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: AZLady on March 03, 2008, 01:54:47 PM
Destiny, I hope I was not the Monkey who offended you during the photo talks.  If I did, I sincerely apologize.  I did not mean to offend but only meant to explain what I thought was an angle that may not have been realized.  I know I sometimes write rather abrupt posts that could be misconstrued.  I need to learn to explain myself better.  If I offended, I apologize. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Anna on March 03, 2008, 01:55:04 PM
KYLE,

Come sit by me.  The things I can tell you. . . . . .


 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::


Good deeds cancel out minor transgressions.  He and the whole crew are heroes for Natalee and Beth.  The photos don't matter that much anyway.  It's test results that count.

They all gave up even Christmas with their families for this effort.  Just like Joran's tape, nothing changes that.

And nothng changes the search by Dave and Red and Tim Miller in that awful dump, MORE heroes.

Young Kyle does have a flair with writing.  Perhaps he will incorporate that with his nautical adventures in some way.

Blessings from God on all these people.

.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: AZLady on March 03, 2008, 01:56:21 PM
I need to go back to work, too.  Talk to all of you later.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 03, 2008, 01:57:29 PM
Tamikosmom, I agree.  Kyle was shocked at the information in the TNI report that we all digested 3 years ago.  He is a scientist and takes things at face value. The Arubans are quite good at presenting one attitude to your face and another behind your back.  We have also learned that over the past 3 years.  I think his youth and lack of experience with people like the ALE and the internet bloggers caused him to misinterpret motivations and actions.  Youth and inexperience are easily cured with time.  He was a valuable member of the search team, and I forgive him his assumptions.

Thank you AZLady.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 03, 2008, 02:00:06 PM
OE post excerpt:

"WHAT do you think you are doing?  What do you seriously think you are going to accomplish with the pics?  Don't you even think to consider for a second that we the search team, who found the trap, supervised it's sampling, recorded that video and others... are ensuring the situation is in proper hands and being taken care of appropriately and completely?  "


I think I missed this the first time, I wonder how many other videos they shot that they have "ensured are in proper hands?" 

Also, what else did they find and film?   



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 03, 2008, 02:00:20 PM
Well, here's certainly some wonderful news.  Bet Carpe can capture it for us, too!



http://www.telegraaf.nl/binnenland/3456742/_Moeder_Natalee__te_gast_bij_Jensen__.html?p=1,2
 
Moeder Natalee Holloway te gast bij Jensen

HILVERSUM - Beth Twitty, de moeder van op de Aruba verdwenen tiener Natalee Holloway, is dinsdagavond te gast in het televisieprogramma Jensen!. Voor het eerst na de spraakmakende uitzending van Peter R. de Vries geeft ze op de Nederlandse televisie haar reactie op de bekentenissen van Joran van der Sloot, aldus RTL maandag.

Beth Twitty the mother of missing teenager Natalee Holloway. will be Tuesday as guest in TV show Jensen. For the first time after the show from Peter R. de Vries she gives to  Dutch TV a reaction to the confession from Joran van der Sloot, said RTL monday.


Tegen presentator Robert Jensen vertelt ze over de schadeclaim die ze gaat indien bij Joran van der Sloot wegens de emotionele schade die ze heeft geleden. Ook gaat ze in op de gebeurtenissen nadat de mediagekte losbarstte en de zoektocht naar haar dochter, die op 30 mei 2005 verdween.

She wukk talk to announcer Robert Jensen about the civil lawsuit against Joran van der Sloot, what he has done emotionally to her. Also she will be talking about the media that is following the case and about the search to her daughter, that was missing on May 30, 2005.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Het beste van Windows, nu ook online. Deel jouw wereld met Windows Live. Download nu.

 ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: AZLady on March 03, 2008, 02:02:15 PM
I'm a bit foggy on this, but I thought John Silvetti, in his request for donations, said they had investigated and filmed about 60 targets and over 100 more were yet to be investigated.  Let me see if I can find it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Destiny on March 03, 2008, 02:02:21 PM
Destiny, I hope I was not the Monkey who offended you during the photo talks.  If I did, I sincerely apologize.  I did not mean to offend but only meant to explain what I thought was an angle that may not have been realized.  I know I sometimes write rather abrupt posts that could be misconstrued.  I need to learn to explain myself better.  If I offended, I apologize. 

No Sweet Pea...wasn't you...it was someone that ******* finally had enough of...come to the cage and rushed her off to bed...and tucked her in niceley...she *needed* her rest... ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: AZLady on March 03, 2008, 02:06:17 PM
Destiny, I hope I was not the Monkey who offended you during the photo talks.  If I did, I sincerely apologize.  I did not mean to offend but only meant to explain what I thought was an angle that may not have been realized.  I know I sometimes write rather abrupt posts that could be misconstrued.  I need to learn to explain myself better.  If I offended, I apologize. 

No Sweet Pea...wasn't you...it was someone that ******* finally had enough of...come to the cage and rushed her off to bed...and tucked her in niceley...she *needed* her rest... ::MonkeyConfused::
whew!   ::MonkeyWink::
I gotcha!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Jo-An on March 03, 2008, 02:07:11 PM
Good thing Beth will be on the Jensen show tomorrow.
A lot of people watch that show.
Personally, I've never watched it before because I cannot stánd that guy!  ::MonkeyHaHa::
I did watch the show where he interviewed Joran however, and I must say that he did a pretty good job.
Usually Robert is a bully and a brat but when Joran was on the show he said things like: "I sense you're holding something back. Some things in your story just don't add up." Joran left the same part of the story out as he did with Patrick - the part on the beach. Robert Jensen was on to him but Joran wouldn't tell.
The main idea will probably be promoting Beth's (translated) book and I certainly hope a lot of people will buy it after tomorrow's show. People deserve to know the other side of the story.
The main focus in Holland has always been Joran so it's about time Beth's side was heard!
My guess is people will be shocked.

Top 60 bestseller list will be published here weekly.
http://www.cpnb.nl/bs/index.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: AZLady on March 03, 2008, 02:08:30 PM
Hello oceanexploration.  Did you have a good flight home?  Any news for us?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Rob on March 03, 2008, 02:08:45 PM
I like to *think* I pick up stuff pretty quickly. But for the life of me, I still don't understand the problems with posting those pictures. Will someone please inform me?

And since no one knows for sure, I'll accept all the conjecture in the world. TIA

I'm not sure what is in that trap. I do not see anything that rules
Natalee in or out of that trap. What am I missing here?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: NM on March 03, 2008, 02:09:34 PM
Jo-ann I think you posted about friends of jurin's currently posting that his 2 younger brothers where in Netherlands with avds.  THANK YOU FOR THAT INFO!!!!!!  Many of us here were given that same info in June 2005 by people in aruba and not friends of the people of the ditch (love that name!).  Also a Monkey found out that 3 people of the ditch (3 van der sloots) flew from nl to aruba the day avds said she came home around June 1.  IMO, pvds needed his younger sons home for an alibi and that is when that story change.  Thanks again for posting that info.

Nope, that wasn't me!  ::MonkeyNoNo::
Don't know who it was though...
RATS!  Sorry about that. Oh no, I hope my mind isn't going. Who am I kidding, ::MonkeyRoll:: it's been gone for some time!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Lala'sMom on March 03, 2008, 02:11:07 PM
Hello monkeys!  Does anyone know if Deepak played tennis?  Has anyone ever seen anything written concerning him taking tennis lessons? TIA


BTW, let's cut Caps some slack here...he is trying to help as best he can.  This fellow is a smart guy and is not intending to sound cryptic at all...he just talks that way sometimes.  Until he proves otherwise to me...I am trusting him as he has me on occasion.  Thanks Monkeys.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Anna on March 03, 2008, 02:12:25 PM
Jo-An

Last time Beth was on his program, we were uneasy because we heard he could be quite rude.  However, he was wonderful to her, a true gentleman and a scholar for the entire program!

She wouldn't go back if he had been mean to her.  I am thankful to him for giving her this opportunity.  Also for letting the people of The Netherlands know what really happened.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: oceanexploration on March 03, 2008, 02:12:57 PM
"Field Project Manager, Geophysical Engineer and Marine Geologist on board the R/V Persistence. Responsible for side scan sonar acquisition, digital processing, analysis, and target identification and location. I will assist in side scan sonar operation and guide the ROV (remotely operated vehicle) team to each sonar target after I pick and analyse each sonar target."

http://geosolutions.blogspot.com/

Hardly a cabin boy.

I do not doubt for one minute that Kyle is very qualified in his profession ... I do not doubt for one minute that Kyle motives in locating the remains of Natalee Hollway were very sincere.

However ... somewhere along the way Kyle was influenced to believe that those within the Aruban investigation were the "good guys" and ... the media which was the sole reason that the Natalee Holloway case did not become a faded memory was the "bad guy".

The following post spoke volumes to me in regards to Kyle naïveté in regards to the dynamics encompassing the "powers that be" in the Aruban investigation who have been behind the coverup which has been denying Natalee Holloway justice.

I cannot comprehend that Kyle would have posted the following words if he had done his homework.  If only he had read Dave Holloway's ... Corruption in Paradise or ... Beth Holloway's ... Loving Natalee.

In November, 2005 ... Dave Holloway conceded that his cooperation with the enemy had not worked.  Dave learned that his goal for justice to prevail for his precious daughter did not reflect ... the Aruban goal to distance Joran and Paulus from implication.

Janet

++++++++

oceanexploration
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #715 1/25 -
« Reply #103 on: January 26, 2008, 12:38:25 PM »


Thought you all may find this interesting if you're willing to accept it-

To date, the Aruban police and dive team has been a tremendous help.  They've honestly done a great job. Over the last month we've established a very good working relationship based on openness and trust.  Most of the relationship success was due to getting the media out of the way and working together shoulder to shoulder over time.  We've helped each other however and whenever we can.  They've treated us with decency and respect and we have treated them as friends and allies, which they are. Most of the police and divers are new since this case started and both eager and careful to do things right.  I wish we had a month ahead of the project just to establish the relationships and trust. I know many of you would likely doubt this view, but it's based on the experiences in the field of the entire search team. I too was extremely worried, paranoid, and suspecting in the beginning.  Now, it's clear we're all working towards a common goal.


Dave Holloway
On the Record w/ Greta
November 17, 2005


HOLLOWAY: ... I made sure that the prime minister understood our position. You know, I had been holding off on this boycott as long as I could, and I told him, I said, you know, The big wave is coming, and if you guys are not going to listen, I can't help you anymore.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,175925,00.html


Dave Holloway
On the Record w/ Greta
April 11, 2006


HOLLOWAY: Oh, the media was our best friend. If it hadn't been for the media this thing would have been swept under the table the very first day and we'd have been calling back to Aruba "Have you heard anything? Have you heard anything?" I truly believe that.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,191377,00.html


I have done my homework. Not all that I posted is geared journalistically.  Some things I had written were specifically geared to send a message.  At times, this message was for only a few people.  This post at SM "praising Aruban authorities" was done with contextual purpose. Eveything I write ends up being read by people who are extremely interested and close to the case.  In context, we (the search team) needed to rapidly gain the trust and cooperation of the Aruban authorities.  Before we arrived, here was no trust, little cooperation, and no sharing of information. Take this for what it's worth:  Keep your friends close and your enemies closer.  Also, don't make assumptions about what I have or have not read.

Not all that I write is my true feelings but is aimed at true purpose. Not everything is clear or should be taken just at face value.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: MumInOhio on March 03, 2008, 02:13:18 PM
NM…I believe it may have been one of our new Dutch Monkeys…Flipper or Katrian(sp) and by the way Welcome!…and sorry if it was not!

 I too would like some further clarification on this…

This is Paulus’ alibi for that evening…he had to pick up Sebastian from I believe the Ziola’s house.(Not sure on the spelling on that either, but it is the only name I can recall Paulus mentioning picking him up from)

If they were in the Netherlands, Paulus has no alibi for the time he was ‘not’ in the casino sitting right next to Natalee or for the rest of the night.

I was reading back then and do remember it being confirmed that there was indeed three ditches on the flight to Aruba.

Anna…I saw it, but am supposed to be busy…maybe I should just logout and I’ll get more done…LOL


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on March 03, 2008, 02:16:38 PM
"Field Project Manager, Geophysical Engineer and Marine Geologist on board the R/V Persistence. Responsible for side scan sonar acquisition, digital processing, analysis, and target identification and location. I will assist in side scan sonar operation and guide the ROV (remotely operated vehicle) team to each sonar target after I pick and analyse each sonar target."

http://geosolutions.blogspot.com/

Hardly a cabin boy.

I do not doubt for one minute that Kyle is very qualified in his profession ... I do not doubt for one minute that Kyle motives in locating the remains of Natalee Hollway were very sincere.

However ... somewhere along the way Kyle was influenced to believe that those within the Aruban investigation were the "good guys" and ... the media which was the sole reason that the Natalee Holloway case did not become a faded memory was the "bad guy".

The following post spoke volumes to me in regards to Kyle naïveté in regards to the dynamics encompassing the "powers that be" in the Aruban investigation who have been behind the coverup which has been denying Natalee Holloway justice.

I cannot comprehend that Kyle would have posted the following words if he had done his homework.  If only he had read Dave Holloway's ... Corruption in Paradise or ... Beth Holloway's ... Loving Natalee.

In November, 2005 ... Dave Holloway conceded that his cooperation with the enemy had not worked.  Dave learned that his goal for justice to prevail for his precious daughter did not reflect ... the Aruban goal to distance Joran and Paulus from implication.

Janet

++++++++

oceanexploration
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #715 1/25 -
« Reply #103 on: January 26, 2008, 12:38:25 PM »


Thought you all may find this interesting if you're willing to accept it-

To date, the Aruban police and dive team has been a tremendous help.  They've honestly done a great job. Over the last month we've established a very good working relationship based on openness and trust.  Most of the relationship success was due to getting the media out of the way and working together shoulder to shoulder over time.  We've helped each other however and whenever we can.  They've treated us with decency and respect and we have treated them as friends and allies, which they are. Most of the police and divers are new since this case started and both eager and careful to do things right.  I wish we had a month ahead of the project just to establish the relationships and trust. I know many of you would likely doubt this view, but it's based on the experiences in the field of the entire search team. I too was extremely worried, paranoid, and suspecting in the beginning.  Now, it's clear we're all working towards a common goal.


Dave Holloway
On the Record w/ Greta
November 17, 2005


HOLLOWAY: ... I made sure that the prime minister understood our position. You know, I had been holding off on this boycott as long as I could, and I told him, I said, you know, The big wave is coming, and if you guys are not going to listen, I can't help you anymore.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,175925,00.html


Dave Holloway
On the Record w/ Greta
April 11, 2006


HOLLOWAY: Oh, the media was our best friend. If it hadn't been for the media this thing would have been swept under the table the very first day and we'd have been calling back to Aruba "Have you heard anything? Have you heard anything?" I truly believe that.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,191377,00.html


I have done my homework. Not all that I posted is geared journalistically.  Some things I had written were specifically geared to send a message.  At times, this message was for only a few people.  This post at SM "praising Aruban authorities" was done with contextual purpose. Eveything I write ends up being read by people who are extremely interested and close to the case.  In context, we (the search team) needed to rapidly gain the trust and cooperation of the Aruban authorities.  Before we arrived, here was no trust, little cooperation, and no sharing of information. Take this for what it's worth:  Keep your friends close and your enemies closer.  Also, don't make assumptions about what I have or have not read.

Not all that I write is my true feelings but is aimed at true purpose. Not everything is clear or should be taken just at face value.

Thank you for your work.Keepthefaith.... ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: AZLady on March 03, 2008, 02:17:26 PM
I like to *think* I pick up stuff pretty quickly. But for the life of me, I still don't understand the problems with posting those pictures. Will someone please inform me?

And since no one knows for sure, I'll accept all the conjecture in the world. TIA

I'm not sure what is in that trap. I do not see anything that rules
Natalee in or out of that trap. What am I missing here?
Rob, I can give you a few guesses off the top of my head, but I don't know for sure.  In academia, of which the scientific community is included, there is a strong belief in integrity of work.  This includes support for the ownership of materials, copyright and other such laws.  Academics carefully and minutely credit the source of their work and related work, ad infinitum.  So, that's the prevailing attitude amongst these folks.  The type of sharing and copying we do on the internet is so foreign to them that I know some who find it shocking.  I think they would have found it shocking that someone took the pictures from a private site and put them in the public domain anonymously.  Especially if the pictures portrayed the remains of a dead person--not Natalee, but any dead person.  I think the request not to repost the pics of Persistence leaving Aruba was a knee jerk reaction to the previous copying of pics. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: oceanexploration on March 03, 2008, 02:17:56 PM
Hello oceanexploration.  Did you have a good flight home?  Any news for us?

Yes thank you.  I have a lot to catch up on. 

News:  As far as the pics of the Persistence leaving goes on BFN..  This was done without my knowledge.  It wasn't meant that anyone should feel slighted. I think the move was thoughtless, but done without malice.  John's sister posts at BFN and requested info and pics from John who merely complied with her request.  It was between those two and does not reflect the thoughts, feelings, or agenda of the search team.  Does this help?  It's the truth.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Anna on March 03, 2008, 02:18:02 PM
Ocean,

I trust you are safely home?  Were you aware of the actions of Chavez and the government of Ecuador before leaving?  The massing of troops on the Colombian border, troops with tanks? 

Is there concern in Aruba about this?

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 03, 2008, 02:19:27 PM
I like to *think* I pick up stuff pretty quickly. But for the life of me, I still don't understand the problems with posting those pictures. Will someone please inform me?

And since no one knows for sure, I'll accept all the conjecture in the world. TIA

I'm not sure what is in that trap. I do not see anything that rules
Natalee in or out of that trap. What am I missing here?

Louis Schafer and Tim Trahan words that were quoted in this February 28, 2008 article/video implies to me that Natalee Holloway's remains have yet to be located.

IMO

Janet

++++++++++++++

http://abclocal.go.com/ktrk/story?section=news/local&id=5988951

Holloway searchers need helpThursday, February 28, 2008 | 8:21 PM

By Cynthia Cisneros


KEMAH, TX (KTRK) -- It's been almost three years since Natalee Holloway disappeared in Aruba on a class trip.  But searchers have not given up hope.

A Kemah businessman has been on the front lines of the search for Natalee, spending over a million dollars of his own money. Over the past four months, he's paid for an underwater search.

The morning we were there, Louis Schafer was signing a wire transfer for $250,000. The money used to operate a sophisticated, deep sea survey boat, named the Persistence.

"I've dedicated a million dollars, I've gone way above that," said Louis Schafer of Underwater Expeditions. "I feel like it's time to ask for help from the American people that want to see this case solved."

The Persistence has been used every day since November to survey the ocean floor near Aruba. It uses remote operated vehicles, called ROVs, to sweep the ocean depths. What they've been able to accomplish is astounding.

"By Friday, we will have surveyed the entire 50-square mile off Aruba," Schafer said. "We have identified at least 60 of the targets. we have about 150 more targets to inspect."

Natalee Holloway traveled to Aruba two years ago to celebrate her high school graduation and disappeared. Natalee was last seen with Joran Van der Sloot who says he does not know what happened to her.

Schafer made a fortune in the deep sea diving business for oil rig removal and installation. He had access to unique technology and a team of experts that could find just about anything.
 
"So we have completely mapped the ocean floor, we know every object that's there, we know every object that could be a container holding her in the sea," he said.  

A relentless search Schafer and his team say will stop, if they don't get more funding.

"And we all feel, I'm speaking from everybody on the team, that she's in one of the targets we have not looked at yet," Tim Trahan of Underwater Expeditions said. "We can't stop. I go to sleep at night thinking we've located it, we just need to get to it."  

The search of the rest of those targets will stop this week. For more information on how you can help,

http://abclocal.go.com/ktrk/story?section=news/local&id=5988951



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 03, 2008, 02:20:28 PM
"Field Project Manager, Geophysical Engineer and Marine Geologist on board the R/V Persistence. Responsible for side scan sonar acquisition, digital processing, analysis, and target identification and location. I will assist in side scan sonar operation and guide the ROV (remotely operated vehicle) team to each sonar target after I pick and analyse each sonar target."

http://geosolutions.blogspot.com/

Hardly a cabin boy.
I for one think people need to read your posts VERY CAREFULLY, especially this one!    ::MonkeyWink::
I do not doubt for one minute that Kyle is very qualified in his profession ... I do not doubt for one minute that Kyle motives in locating the remains of Natalee Hollway were very sincere.

However ... somewhere along the way Kyle was influenced to believe that those within the Aruban investigation were the "good guys" and ... the media which was the sole reason that the Natalee Holloway case did not become a faded memory was the "bad guy".

The following post spoke volumes to me in regards to Kyle naïveté in regards to the dynamics encompassing the "powers that be" in the Aruban investigation who have been behind the coverup which has been denying Natalee Holloway justice.

I cannot comprehend that Kyle would have posted the following words if he had done his homework.  If only he had read Dave Holloway's ... Corruption in Paradise or ... Beth Holloway's ... Loving Natalee.

In November, 2005 ... Dave Holloway conceded that his cooperation with the enemy had not worked.  Dave learned that his goal for justice to prevail for his precious daughter did not reflect ... the Aruban goal to distance Joran and Paulus from implication.

Janet

++++++++

oceanexploration
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #715 1/25 -
« Reply #103 on: January 26, 2008, 12:38:25 PM »


Thought you all may find this interesting if you're willing to accept it-

To date, the Aruban police and dive team has been a tremendous help.  They've honestly done a great job. Over the last month we've established a very good working relationship based on openness and trust.  Most of the relationship success was due to getting the media out of the way and working together shoulder to shoulder over time.  We've helped each other however and whenever we can.  They've treated us with decency and respect and we have treated them as friends and allies, which they are. Most of the police and divers are new since this case started and both eager and careful to do things right.  I wish we had a month ahead of the project just to establish the relationships and trust. I know many of you would likely doubt this view, but it's based on the experiences in the field of the entire search team. I too was extremely worried, paranoid, and suspecting in the beginning.  Now, it's clear we're all working towards a common goal.


Dave Holloway
On the Record w/ Greta
November 17, 2005


HOLLOWAY: ... I made sure that the prime minister understood our position. You know, I had been holding off on this boycott as long as I could, and I told him, I said, you know, The big wave is coming, and if you guys are not going to listen, I can't help you anymore.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,175925,00.html


Dave Holloway
On the Record w/ Greta
April 11, 2006


HOLLOWAY: Oh, the media was our best friend. If it hadn't been for the media this thing would have been swept under the table the very first day and we'd have been calling back to Aruba "Have you heard anything? Have you heard anything?" I truly believe that.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,191377,00.html


I have done my homework. Not all that I posted is geared journalistically.  Some things I had written were specifically geared to send a message.  At times, this message was for only a few people.  This post at SM "praising Aruban authorities" was done with contextual purpose. Eveything I write ends up being read by people who are extremely interested and close to the case.  In context, we (the search team) needed to rapidly gain the trust and cooperation of the Aruban authorities.  Before we arrived, here was no trust, little cooperation, and no sharing of information. Take this for what it's worth:  Keep your friends close and your enemies closer.  Also, don't make assumptions about what I have or have not read.

Not all that I write is my true feelings but is aimed at true purpose. Not everything is clear or should be taken just at face value.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: oceanexploration on March 03, 2008, 02:21:24 PM
btw, I ran into Deepak and Satish outside of Mambo Jambo on Saturday night.  It looked like the bouncers didn't let them in the club. I would have loved to have bought them both a Balashi and had a chat.  No dice.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: AZLady on March 03, 2008, 02:23:04 PM


I have done my homework. Not all that I posted is geared journalistically.  Some things I had written were specifically geared to send a message.  At times, this message was for only a few people.  This post at SM "praising Aruban authorities" was done with contextual purpose. Eveything I write ends up being read by people who are extremely interested and close to the case.  In context, we (the search team) needed to rapidly gain the trust and cooperation of the Aruban authorities.  Before we arrived, here was no trust, little cooperation, and no sharing of information. Take this for what it's worth:  Keep your friends close and your enemies closer.  Also, don't make assumptions about what I have or have not read.

Not all that I write is my true feelings but is aimed at true purpose. Not everything is clear or should be taken just at face value.
Ya know, I knew that.  You are one smart cookie.  I've been rereading your posts.  For one so young (and I know that is relative...), your accomplishments are noteworthy.  Thank you for being who you are and giving of yourself to Beth and Dave and their families.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 03, 2008, 02:26:01 PM
My comment didn't come though.... ::MonkeyConfused::

I for one think people just need to read your posts VERY CAREFULLY, including this one!!   ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Destiny on March 03, 2008, 02:26:11 PM
I like to *think* I pick up stuff pretty quickly. But for the life of me, I still don't understand the problems with posting those pictures. Will someone please inform me?

And since no one knows for sure, I'll accept all the conjecture in the world. TIA

I'm not sure what is in that trap. I do not see anything that rules
Natalee in or out of that trap. What am I missing here?

Rob..I think what we are all missing here...is someone...*anyone*...telling us the truth.

For whatever reason(s)...they feel they can't...or wont...I'm just as stymied as you..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Rob on March 03, 2008, 02:27:02 PM
I like to *think* I pick up stuff pretty quickly. But for the life of me, I still don't understand the problems with posting those pictures. Will someone please inform me?

And since no one knows for sure, I'll accept all the conjecture in the world. TIA

I'm not sure what is in that trap. I do not see anything that rules
Natalee in or out of that trap. What am I missing here?
Rob, I can give you a few guesses off the top of my head, but I don't know for sure.  In academia, of which the scientific community is included, there is a strong belief in integrity of work.  This includes support for the ownership of materials, copyright and other such laws.  Academics carefully and minutely credit the source of their work and related work, ad infinitum.  So, that's the prevailing attitude amongst these folks.  The type of sharing and copying we do on the internet is so foreign to them that I know some who find it shocking.  I think they would have found it shocking that someone took the pictures from a private site and put them in the public domain anonymously.  Especially if the pictures portrayed the remains of a dead person--not Natalee, but any dead person.  I think the request not to repost the pics of Persistence leaving Aruba was a knee jerk reaction to the previous copying of pics. 

Thanks AZ - I think we are thinking on the same lines here.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 03, 2008, 02:27:29 PM
I like to *think* I pick up stuff pretty quickly. But for the life of me, I still don't understand the problems with posting those pictures. Will someone please inform me?

And since no one knows for sure, I'll accept all the conjecture in the world. TIA

I'm not sure what is in that trap. I do not see anything that rules
Natalee in or out of that trap. What am I missing here?


I give Tim ... Dave and ... Beth the benefit of the doubt.  They were all speaking the truth ... there was nothing connected to Natalee Holloway in that enormous cage/trap.

I cried when I read Dave Holloways words.

Janet

+++++++++++++


The search for Natalee Holloway
It's the story you haven't heard: the tale of two parents who, even now, willgo anywhere -- and endure anything -- to find answers.

TRANSCRIPT
By Chris Hansen
Correspondent
NBC News
updated 5:20 p.m. PT, Fri., Feb. 22, 2008  

On Dec. 30, off the coast of Aruba, divers from the Aruban police force and the research vessel Persistence were about to make a crucial dive on a promising target in the search for Natalee Holloway.
 
The researchers had discovered a fish trap about 90 feet below the surface in almost the exact spot search expert Tim Miller had theorized Natalee’s body might be.

Team leader Tim Trahan suited up to join the Aruban police divers. As Tim Miller wished him well, the divers hit the water and the ROV was sent down to capture what would happen for everyone watching on board.

(On the boat) Brandon: We have visual on divers and target.

Slowly the divers worked their way down to the trap. They had been instructed to give a thumbs up or thumbs down.  The atmosphere in the survey room was tense, and nerves were raw as Miller, the Aruban authorities and the crew of the Persistence waited for word of what exactly was in the trap. The divers approached the target and signaled above. And then...

(On the boat) No it's thumbs down. Negative, not it.

Crushing disappointment.

(On the boat) Tim Miller: Divers coming up right now. I don't know it looked as promising today as it did last night or before.

Miller: Nothing?

Trahan: No.

Chris Hansen: That had to be a crushing blow.

Tim Miller: It was a crushing blow.
 
Now Tim Miller had to deliver that same crushing blow to Natalee’s parents.

Chris Hansen: How hard is it for you to dial their numbers and tell them that this in fact is not the break in the case we-- we hoped for?

Tim Miller: Probably one of the hardest calls I ever made. Probably one of the hardest … probably should have never made the first one. But everything looked right at the time.  

Natalee’s father was at home in Mississippi when the call came.

Chris Hansen: What was it like for you to, once again, have a setback?

Dave Holloway: That's probably about the time that-- the chest pains intensified to an extreme. I mean, how many times can I take this?  

Beth Holloway: You know, it's a disappointment. But, you have to look at the magnitude and the sacrifices being made even to get to that point.  

Chris Hansen: You didn't know these folks before this happened. What do they represent to you now?
 
Dave Holloway: They represent heroes to me.
 
To be sure there was no relevant evidence, material from the trap was given to the FBI.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23301056/page/5/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: AZLady on March 03, 2008, 02:27:54 PM
btw, I ran into Deepak and Satish outside of Mambo Jambo on Saturday night.  It looked like the bouncers didn't let them in the club. I would have loved to have bought them both a Balashi and had a chat.  No dice.
Those two...out on Saturday night.  Without Joran, they don't get VIP passes to get into clubs.  That's how it works on Aruba.  Yes, I would have liked to have chatted with them, too.  But, I think they are streetwise and would not have talked to the likes of you or me, unless we were handing them cash, of course.  And then we should not believe a word they say.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: NM on March 03, 2008, 02:28:57 PM
NM…I believe it may have been one of our new Dutch Monkeys…Flipper or Katrian(sp) and by the way Welcome!…and sorry if it was not!

 I too would like some further clarification on this…

This is Paulus’ alibi for that evening…he had to pick up Sebastian from I believe the Ziola’s house.(Not sure on the spelling on that either, but it is the only name I can recall Paulus mentioning picking him up from)

If they were in the Netherlands, Paulus has no alibi for the time he was ‘not’ in the casino sitting right next to Natalee or for the rest of the night.

I was reading back then and do remember it being confirmed that there was indeed three ditches on the flight to Aruba.

Anna…I saw it, but am supposed to be busy…maybe I should just logout and I’ll get more done…LOL

Thanks MuminOhio!!!!  I picked the wrong new poster.  I think you are right is was Katrian.
We are on the same page and believe the same as many Monkeys.
To me the 2 younger ditches were in nl with avds.  That was the info we got when info was reliable. It only changed to the 2 younger ditches being in aruba when pvds used them as an alibi.  Then a Monkey made some calls and confirmed that 3 ditches flew nl to aruba June 1 ( I think that was the date).

Destiny I just want to say that I admire the way you handled things.

Klaas you are always great in battle .  She "blowed-up real good" (to quote second city t.v.)


Great to see you OC. I hope you had a nice trip home.

Belated THANK YOU TO NYC boycott Monkeys


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Anna on March 03, 2008, 02:30:54 PM
btw, I ran into Deepak and Satish outside of Mambo Jambo on Saturday night.  It looked like the bouncers didn't let them in the club. I would have loved to have bought them both a Balashi and had a chat.  No dice.
Those two...out on Saturday night.  Without Joran, they don't get VIP passes to get into clubs.  That's how it works on Aruba.  Yes, I would have liked to have chatted with them, too.  But, I think they are streetwise and would not have talked to the likes of you or me, unless we were handing them cash, of course.  And then we should not believe a word they say.

I'd like to buy them a drink, too, except at Carlos and Charlies.  One from the second bar.  And one from the bottle with the big "X" on it!

 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyCool:: ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Rob on March 03, 2008, 02:31:05 PM
I like to *think* I pick up stuff pretty quickly. But for the life of me, I still don't understand the problems with posting those pictures. Will someone please inform me?

And since no one knows for sure, I'll accept all the conjecture in the world. TIA

I'm not sure what is in that trap. I do not see anything that rules
Natalee in or out of that trap. What am I missing here?

Rob..I think what we are all missing here...is someone...*anyone*...telling us the truth.

For whatever reason(s)...they feel they can't...or wont...I'm just as stymied as you..

Hi Des, you know, all I want is the truth. I know there are many others that want that also, no matter what it is. And after three years, I think we should know the truth by now.

And I don't mean taking someone with no connection to the case and making him /  her fit an agenda.

All I want is the truth.

What is the truth?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: AZLady on March 03, 2008, 02:31:55 PM
oceanexplorer, were the clubs busy on Saturday night?  Did it look like mostly locals or tourists? 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Destiny on March 03, 2008, 02:32:55 PM
btw, I ran into Deepak and Satish outside of Mambo Jambo on Saturday night.  It looked like the bouncers didn't let them in the club. I would have loved to have bought them both a Balashi and had a chat.  No dice.

Thanks OE!...sounds like those 2 Bros really are joined at the hip...to insure tight lips?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: AZLady on March 03, 2008, 02:33:21 PM
Rob, someone with authority (?) needs to focus on Paulus.  That's the key.  He holds the truth.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Lala'sMom on March 03, 2008, 02:34:40 PM
It would be interstring to know if ALE even asked if the younger Sloots were in school the next day, wouldn't it?  Did they even ask the bus driver if they were on the bus?  Did they ask the teachers?  Of course not!  There were no frosted flakes at the school cafeteria that morning.  :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: AZLady on March 03, 2008, 02:35:28 PM
Now, I really HAVE to get some work done today.  Carry on Monkey friends.  I'll join you later.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: private eye on March 03, 2008, 02:35:47 PM
Well, here's certainly some wonderful news.  Bet Carpe can capture it for us, too!



http://www.telegraaf.nl/binnenland/3456742/_Moeder_Natalee__te_gast_bij_Jensen__.html?p=1,2
 
Moeder Natalee Holloway te gast bij Jensen

HILVERSUM - Beth Twitty, de moeder van op de Aruba verdwenen tiener Natalee Holloway, is dinsdagavond te gast in het televisieprogramma Jensen!. Voor het eerst na de spraakmakende uitzending van Peter R. de Vries geeft ze op de Nederlandse televisie haar reactie op de bekentenissen van Joran van der Sloot, aldus RTL maandag.

Beth Twitty the mother of missing teenager Natalee Holloway. will be Tuesday as guest in TV show Jensen. For the first time after the show from Peter R. de Vries she gives to  Dutch TV a reaction to the confession from Joran van der Sloot, said RTL monday.


Tegen presentator Robert Jensen vertelt ze over de schadeclaim die ze gaat indien bij Joran van der Sloot wegens de emotionele schade die ze heeft geleden. Ook gaat ze in op de gebeurtenissen nadat de mediagekte losbarstte en de zoektocht naar haar dochter, die op 30 mei 2005 verdween.

She wukk talk to announcer Robert Jensen about the civil lawsuit against Joran van der Sloot, what he has done emotionally to her. Also she will be talking about the media that is following the case and about the search to her daughter, that was missing on May 30, 2005.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Het beste van Windows, nu ook online. Deel jouw wereld met Windows Live. Download nu.



Well!!!  Didn't any of you read my post???  I was very proud of my little find.

 ::MonkeyShocked:: ::MonkeyNoNo:: ::MonkeyShocked::
I am proud of it and appreciate it Good work:)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Rob on March 03, 2008, 02:36:00 PM
Rob, someone with authority (?) needs to focus on Paulus.  That's the key.  He holds the truth.

I agree, Twan Huys* got the truth. And then that was the end of it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: MumInOhio on March 03, 2008, 02:39:55 PM
btw, I ran into Deepak and Satish outside of Mambo Jambo on Saturday night.  It looked like the bouncers didn't let them in the club. I would have loved to have bought them both a Balashi and had a chat.  No dice.

LOl...I don't suppose that Freddy was with them....He is the one I would like for you to buy a drink or two!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: private eye on March 03, 2008, 02:40:52 PM
btw, I ran into Deepak and Satish outside of Mambo Jambo on Saturday night.  It looked like the bouncers didn't let them in the club. I would have loved to have bought them both a Balashi and had a chat.  No dice.

Thanks OE!...sounds like those 2 Bros really are joined at the hip...to insure tight lips?

In more ways than one ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: oceanexploration on March 03, 2008, 02:43:02 PM
OE post excerpt:

"WHAT do you think you are doing?  What do you seriously think you are going to accomplish with the pics?  Don't you even think to consider for a second that we the search team, who found the trap, supervised it's sampling, recorded that video and others... are ensuring the situation is in proper hands and being taken care of appropriately and completely?  "


I think I missed this the first time, I wonder how many other videos they shot that they have "ensured are in proper hands?" 

Also, what else did they find and film?   


[/quote

There were three ROV dive videos of the trap.  Video 1 : 29th Dec - ROV visual inspection of the trap.  (very small clip of this video on Dateline).  Remember, the Dateline footage was taken over our shoulders by filming the ROV monitor.  The footage is not the recorded ROV footage.
Video 2: Dec 30th - ROV and Diver visual-only inspection of trap.  This is the dive Dateline and Tim Miller witnessed, also the dive footage the screen captures I made came from that were posted by Robin at BNH.  I sent these 6 screen shots to the FBI and the FBI only. I was shocked to see them posted.  I thought we had a security breach on the boat from my workstation or a leak from the FBI.  Turns out the FBI gave them to Dave H. after he couldn't get them from me.  After Tim Miller told Dave that we found her in a trap with 99.9% certainty (this is pre-diver inspection), Dave very reasonably requested them from me.  I badly wanted to send them to him, but couldn't.  Apparently, shortly therafter the FBI send the screen shots to Dave anyway, and therefore Robin had them. 

What you all really didn't know (nor Tim Miller when he said his statements to the press, neither Dateline NBC when they broadcasted their lovely special):

Video 3:  Jan 7th - ROV monitoring diver tactile inspection of the trap with sampling of items inside and outside of trap.  The trap was not recovered.  Recovered samples sent for forensic analysis.  Neither Tim Miller nor the media were on board.

The trap in Video 1-3 was found from the first conducted ROV dive.  I found the target at 1:46 am on Christmas morning.  It was my #1 ranked priority target and therefore the first of the ROV dive series. 

Several hours of footage were of other dives on other targets.  None were of any relevance. Most targets were of peculiar coral pinnacles, man-made debris, and ship wrecks.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: oceanexploration on March 03, 2008, 02:47:47 PM
There were three ROV dive videos of the trap.  Video 1 : 29th Dec - ROV visual inspection of the trap.  (very small clip of this video on Dateline).  Remember, the Dateline footage was taken over our shoulders by filming the ROV monitor.  The footage is not the recorded ROV footage.
Video 2: Dec 30th - ROV and Diver visual-only inspection of trap.  This is the dive Dateline and Tim Miller witnessed, also the dive footage the screen captures I made came from that were posted by Robin at BNH.  I sent these 6 screen shots to the FBI and the FBI only. I was shocked to see them posted.  I thought we had a security breach on the boat from my workstation or a leak from the FBI.  Turns out the FBI gave them to Dave H. after he couldn't get them from me.  After Tim Miller told Dave that we found her in a trap with 99.9% certainty (this is pre-diver inspection), Dave very reasonably requested them from me.  I badly wanted to send them to him, but couldn't.  Apparently, shortly therafter the FBI send the screen shots to Dave anyway, and therefore Robin had them. 

What you all really didn't know (nor Tim Miller when he said his statements to the press, neither Dateline NBC when they broadcasted their lovely special):

Video 3:  Jan 7th - ROV monitoring diver tactile inspection of the trap with sampling of items inside and outside of trap.  The trap was not recovered.  Recovered samples sent for forensic analysis.  Neither Tim Miller nor the media were on board.

The trap in Video 1-3 was found from the first conducted ROV dive.  I found the target at 1:46 am on Christmas morning.  It was my #1 ranked priority target and therefore the first of the ROV dive series. 

Several hours of footage were of other dives on other targets.  None were of any relevance. Most targets were of peculiar coral pinnacles, man-made debris, and ship wrecks.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Rob on March 03, 2008, 02:50:11 PM
Kyle thanks for the explanation. Can you tell us who was in the trap? or is it an unknown?

Apparently there is DNA, so that indicates a body.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 03, 2008, 02:50:58 PM


There were three ROV dive videos of the trap.  Video 1 : 29th Dec - ROV visual inspection of the trap.  (very small clip of this video on Dateline).  Remember, the Dateline footage was taken over our shoulders by filming the ROV monitor.  The footage is not the recorded ROV footage.

Video 2: Dec 30th - ROV and Diver visual-only inspection of trap.  This is the dive Dateline and Tim Miller witnessed, also the dive footage the screen captures I made came from that were posted by Robin at BNH.  I sent these 6 screen shots to the FBI and the FBI only. I was shocked to see them posted.  I thought we had a security breach on the boat from my workstation or a leak from the FBI.  Turns out the FBI gave them to Dave H. after he couldn't get them from me.  After Tim Miller told Dave that we found her in a trap with 99.9% certainty (this is pre-diver inspection), Dave very reasonably requested them from me.  I badly wanted to send them to him, but couldn't.  Apparently, shortly therafter the FBI send the screen shots to Dave anyway, and therefore Robin had them.  

What you all really didn't know (nor Tim Miller when he said his statements to the press, neither Dateline NBC when they broadcasted their lovely special):

Video 3:  Jan 7th - ROV monitoring diver tactile inspection of the trap with sampling of items inside and outside of trap.  The trap was not recovered.  Recovered samples sent for forensic analysis.  Neither Tim Miller nor the media were on board.

The trap in Video 1-3 was found from the first conducted ROV dive.  I found the target at 1:46 am on Christmas morning.  It was my #1 ranked priority target and therefore the first of the ROV dive series. 

Several hours of footage were of other dives on other targets.  None were of any relevance. Most targets were of peculiar coral pinnacles, man-made debris, and ship wrecks.


Thank you.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: private eye on March 03, 2008, 02:54:21 PM
There were three ROV dive videos of the trap.  Video 1 : 29th Dec - ROV visual inspection of the trap.  (very small clip of this video on Dateline).  Remember, the Dateline footage was taken over our shoulders by filming the ROV monitor.  The footage is not the recorded ROV footage.
Video 2: Dec 30th - ROV and Diver visual-only inspection of trap.  This is the dive Dateline and Tim Miller witnessed, also the dive footage the screen captures I made came from that were posted by Robin at BNH.  I sent these 6 screen shots to the FBI and the FBI only. I was shocked to see them posted.  I thought we had a security breach on the boat from my workstation or a leak from the FBI.  Turns out the FBI gave them to Dave H. after he couldn't get them from me.  After Tim Miller told Dave that we found her in a trap with 99.9% certainty (this is pre-diver inspection), Dave very reasonably requested them from me.  I badly wanted to send them to him, but couldn't.  Apparently, shortly therafter the FBI send the screen shots to Dave anyway, and therefore Robin had them. 

What you all really didn't know (nor Tim Miller when he said his statements to the press, neither Dateline NBC when they broadcasted their lovely special):

Video 3:  Jan 7th - ROV monitoring diver tactile inspection of the trap with sampling of items inside and outside of trap.  The trap was not recovered.  Recovered samples sent for forensic analysis.  Neither Tim Miller nor the media were on board.

The trap in Video 1-3 was found from the first conducted ROV dive.  I found the target at 1:46 am on Christmas morning.  It was my #1 ranked priority target and therefore the first of the ROV dive series. 

Several hours of footage were of other dives on other targets.  None were of any relevance. Most targets were of peculiar coral pinnacles, man-made debris, and ship wrecks.

Why did the Persistence not get more TV time on the Dateline. I was expecting an hour long special on the workings of the boat, and I assume there were literally hundreds of hours of film footage that would have made fascinating television viewing?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 03, 2008, 02:55:42 PM
OE post excerpt:

"WHAT do you think you are doing?  What do you seriously think you are going to accomplish with the pics?  Don't you even think to consider for a second that we the search team, who found the trap, supervised it's sampling, recorded that video and others... are ensuring the situation is in proper hands and being taken care of appropriately and completely?  "


I think I missed this the first time, I wonder how many other videos they shot that they have "ensured are in proper hands?" 

Also, what else did they find and film?   


[/quote

There were three ROV dive videos of the trap.  Video 1 : 29th Dec - ROV visual inspection of the trap.  (very small clip of this video on Dateline).  Remember, the Dateline footage was taken over our shoulders by filming the ROV monitor.  The footage is not the recorded ROV footage.
Video 2: Dec 30th - ROV and Diver visual-only inspection of trap.  This is the dive Dateline and Tim Miller witnessed, also the dive footage the screen captures I made came from that were posted by Robin at BNH.  I sent these 6 screen shots to the FBI and the FBI only. I was shocked to see them posted.  I thought we had a security breach on the boat from my workstation or a leak from the FBI.  Turns out the FBI gave them to Dave H. after he couldn't get them from me.  After Tim Miller told Dave that we found her in a trap with 99.9% certainty (this is pre-diver inspection), Dave very reasonably requested them from me.  I badly wanted to send them to him, but couldn't.  Apparently, shortly therafter the FBI send the screen shots to Dave anyway, and therefore Robin had them. 

What you all really didn't know (nor Tim Miller when he said his statements to the press, neither Dateline NBC when they broadcasted their lovely special):

Video 3:  Jan 7th - ROV monitoring diver tactile inspection of the trap with sampling of items inside and outside of trap.  The trap was not recovered.  Recovered samples sent for forensic analysis.  Neither Tim Miller nor the media were on board.

The trap in Video 1-3 was found from the first conducted ROV dive.  I found the target at 1:46 am on Christmas morning.  It was my #1 ranked priority target and therefore the first of the ROV dive series. 

Several hours of footage were of other dives on other targets.  None were of any relevance. Most targets were of peculiar coral pinnacles, man-made debris, and ship wrecks.


Wow, that was one hell of a first target! Reaffirms the methodical process you and others implemented.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: jackb on March 03, 2008, 02:56:28 PM
CAPS  Thank you for the info and summary of the telearuba program last night.  thank you also for all info, translations, etc.  I am really glad you are here and a Monkey. Thank you!!!!

JackB I think you ask what is "bogart a spliff"  bogart is when you either take a really long, hard drag of a tobacco like product and/or you hang onto the tobaaco like product for a long time, not allowing others to share.  Spliff or blunt is a part tobacco, part weed cigarrette.

Jo-ann I think you posted about friends of jurin's currently posting that his 2 younger brothers where in Netherlands with avds.  THANK YOU FOR THAT INFO!!!!!!  Many of us here were given that same info in June 2005 by people in aruba and not friends of the people of the ditch (love that name!).  Also a Monkey found out that 3 people of the ditch (3 van der sloots) flew from nl to aruba the day avds said she came home around June 1.  IMO, pvds needed his younger sons home for an alibi and that is when that story change.  Thanks again for posting that info.


Welcome all new and newish Monkeys.  It is so great to have you all here.


******* sorry for the loss of you 2 beloved pets.  PS I don't have the ability to differentiate between animal types. So the loss of a dog, cat is a much as a human to me.

Thanks (you sound like a dh to me) old friend of the family.  Anyway that, I thought was part of the female anatomy from the way he was talking.  Trying to keep up with the old and new sayings.  Not too good at either.   Thanks, Jack


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Anna on March 03, 2008, 03:01:26 PM
Thanks (you sound like a dh to me) old friend of the family.  Anyway that, I thought was part of the female anatomy from the way he was talking.  Trying to keep up with the old and new sayings.  Not too good at either.   Thanks, Jack


I think this comes from the way Humphrey Bogart would have a cigarette dangling out of his mouth while talking, etc. his movies in essence wasting a joint.  Years ago there was a song "Don't Bogart that Joint, My Friend, Pass It On to Me."


.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: jackb on March 03, 2008, 03:16:41 PM
Kyle thanks for the explanation. Can you tell us who was in the trap? or is it an unknown?

Apparently there is DNA, so that indicates a body.

Common sense goes a long way.  You sound like you got plenty.    jackb


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: jackb on March 03, 2008, 03:20:15 PM


There were three ROV dive videos of the trap.  Video 1 : 29th Dec - ROV visual inspection of the trap.  (very small clip of this video on Dateline).  Remember, the Dateline footage was taken over our shoulders by filming the ROV monitor.  The footage is not the recorded ROV footage.

Video 2: Dec 30th - ROV and Diver visual-only inspection of trap.  This is the dive Dateline and Tim Miller witnessed, also the dive footage the screen captures I made came from that were posted by Robin at BNH.  I sent these 6 screen shots to the FBI and the FBI only. I was shocked to see them posted.  I thought we had a security breach on the boat from my workstation or a leak from the FBI.  Turns out the FBI gave them to Dave H. after he couldn't get them from me.  After Tim Miller told Dave that we found her in a trap with 99.9% certainty (this is pre-diver inspection), Dave very reasonably requested them from me.  I badly wanted to send them to him, but couldn't.  Apparently, shortly therafter the FBI send the screen shots to Dave anyway, and therefore Robin had them.  

What you all really didn't know (nor Tim Miller when he said his statements to the press, neither Dateline NBC when they broadcasted their lovely special):

Video 3:  Jan 7th - ROV monitoring diver tactile inspection of the trap with sampling of items inside and outside of trap.  The trap was not recovered.  Recovered samples sent for forensic analysis.  Neither Tim Miller nor the media were on board.

The trap in Video 1-3 was found from the first conducted ROV dive.  I found the target at 1:46 am on Christmas morning.  It was my #1 ranked priority target and therefore the first of the ROV dive series. 

Several hours of footage were of other dives on other targets.  None were of any relevance. Most targets were of peculiar coral pinnacles, man-made debris, and ship wrecks.


Thank you.

But......your dive pics were different is what you are saying?  I agree.  jack blue.  They were.     

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: private eye on March 03, 2008, 03:25:13 PM
Any estimations as to the dimensions and weight of the cage, or based upon the general conditions of the cage, coral build up, rust, etc. how long the cage had been submersed? It looked awfully large, but water can distort sizes to a certain extent. It looked a lot larger than the cages that would have been at the fishermans hut.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: jackb on March 03, 2008, 03:29:05 PM
Old Fart...the Persistence has left Aruba as of this morning at 8:20AM according to LegallyLex at BFN.... there are pictures of the boat leaving but they asked for them not to be moved off the site...  ::MonkeyShocked::


Yes, I just read that over there. Well, it won't be long before those photos will be all over...starting with RU, I'll bet. Hell, 1/2 of RU are members at BFN and BNH. How do they expect those photos to stay there :roll: . I won't take them, but we all know MANY from RU and BNH sure will!!

What a way to promote a DONATION. This is ridiculous, like BFN are the only ones that cared, supported and have donated?


So Kyle is sort of a cabin boy?


I was catching up this morning and came across the above post and found it odd that it was asked the pics not leave BFN as IF  no one but BFN members are the only ones that care, have supported, donated, spent endless hours..etc ..on and on.

It's just odd to me that the pics of the Persistence photos leaving Aruba have been requested to stay on BFN.



Sounds like of like a deliberate snub, doesn't it?

Well, I'm just not going to be offended anyway.  Their frustration level had to be off the chart.  Maybe Kyle will give us some explanation when he gets home and rested up.  Will withhold judgment until then.

And even if he doesn't, we are all on the same team.  And Tim Miller was a part of that search and I know he would never want to do anything to snub the Monkeys.

They all still have my gratitude and prayers and wishes for a return to finish the search if it is deemed likely to find Natalee.

We have to be uniters and not dividers and all the supporters of Natalee's family must pull together even if we don't always agree on things and I mean the search crew and BFN as well as any supporters anywhere.

It's still about Natalee for me, egos be damned no matter whose they are.  I'm here now basically for Beth, to be perfectly candid.  I don't really care what games they play with pictures anyway.  They gave months of their lives and I love them for that no matter what else they may do.


jmoo

They (the authorities) can still maintain the chain of evidence; their chain.  Perhaps they (those appearing to snub) are not realizing that.  Again, there are most likely reasons other than the "snub."  However some people do tend to be thinking themselves "special."  It is their whole life to be on the inside of a circle.  There are many circles, but one life.  These same people will suck the sap out of each other and move on and try to do the same thing in as many "circles" as they can until they are convinced they are the circle. What I am comparing this to is a street scene murder where there is a yellow tape, but still onlookers can see a lot, but not know the circumstances and cannot see as well as those inside the tape.  Yes, they are being over cautious for either lack of knowledge or maybe even   financial gain,   LOL   Jackb


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Peaches on March 03, 2008, 03:29:41 PM
One more time. You cannot call an airline and ask who WAS on a plane.  They will not tell you because 1) they aren't allowed to 2) it's none of your business 3) the person you talk to does not have that information anyway.  If you fly on Monday, 24 hours later, flight information is now past date....all of it.  You can't even tell if it was on time or not once 24hours passes. 

If you call the airline, they don't know you from Adam's housecat.  They are not and cannot say with 100% certainty that someone is on an airplane.  They can tell you whether or not someone is "checked in" which is not the same as whose butt in the seat, assuming there is a butt in the seat.  They can tell you who has a reservation (but they're not really supposed to and you best have a good story if you think you're going to get that information.) 

Since 9/11, I would imagine things have changed somewhat.   Rules about passenger information and privacy are probably tighter than they used to be. 

My point is we really don't know if the two younger Sloots were with Anita in Holland or not.  Calling KLM a couple weeks later is not going to net you that information because the records are long gone by then.  I'm sure a subpoena would be necessary to obtain the information from microfiche (this is where the info used to go).   


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: katrien on March 03, 2008, 03:35:22 PM
Jo-ann I think you posted about friends of jurin's currently posting that his 2 younger brothers where in Netherlands with avds.  THANK YOU FOR THAT INFO!!!!!!  Many of us here were given that same info in June 2005 by people in aruba and not friends of the people of the ditch (love that name!).  Also a Monkey found out that 3 people of the ditch (3 van der sloots) flew from nl to aruba the day avds said she came home around June 1.  IMO, pvds needed his younger sons home for an alibi and that is when that story change.  Thanks again for posting that info.

Here are the posts from Fok.

Beth Holloway in Jensen tomorrow? I'll have a look.

Quote
kinkajoe
donderdag 28 februari 2008 @ 18:12 (#27)   
         
Op zaterdag 23 februari 2008 15:56 schreef mrBhimself het volgende:
En overigens Anita van der Sloot was helemaal niet in Amerika, maar was samen met haar jongste twee kinderen in Nederland op bezoek bij haar moeder. Je bent wederom eens slecht geinformeerd!

Volgens deze poster was Mw. v.d. Sloot met twee kinderen in Nederland.

 mrBhimself
donderdag 28 februari 2008 @ 18:56 (#28)   
                 
Inderdaad
Don't follow leaders, watch the parking meters

Mr B says: "and by the way, Anita van der Sloot was not at all in America, but with her youngest two children in Holland to visit her mother. You are again very bad informed"

Kinkajoe quotes this sentence in a thread about the brothers and says: "according to this poster Mrs. v.d. Sloot was with two children in Holland".

Mr B came to the thread about the brothers to say: "Indeed, don't follow leaders, watch the parking meters".


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: oceanexploration on March 03, 2008, 03:35:58 PM
Any estimations as to the dimensions and weight of the cage, or based upon the general conditions of the cage, coral build up, rust, etc. how long the cage had been submersed? It looked awfully large, but water can distort sizes to a certain extent. It looked a lot larger than the cages that would have been at the fishermans hut.

The trap was symmetrical in width and length at approximately 7.5 ft. It was approximately 2.25-2.5 ft high.  You're correct about the ROV video lens distorting perspective due to the paralax view lens. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: private eye on March 03, 2008, 03:36:54 PM
One more time. You cannot call an airline and ask who WAS on a plane.  They will not tell you because 1) they aren't allowed to 2) it's none of your business 3) the person you talk to does not have that information anyway.  If you fly on Monday, 24 hours later, flight information is now past date....all of it.  You can't even tell if it was on time or not once 24hours passes. 

If you call the airline, they don't know you from Adam's housecat.  They are not and cannot say with 100% certainty that someone is on an airplane.  They can tell you whether or not someone is "checked in" which is not the same as whose butt in the seat, assuming there is a butt in the seat.  They can tell you who has a reservation (but they're not really supposed to and you best have a good story if you think you're going to get that information.) 

Since 9/11, I would imagine things have changed somewhat.   Rules about passenger information and privacy are probably tighter than they used to be. 

My point is we really don't know if the two younger Sloots were with Anita in Holland or not.  Calling KLM a couple weeks later is not going to net you that information because the records are long gone by then.  I'm sure a subpoena would be necessary to obtain the information from microfiche (this is where the info used to go).   

Didn't Paulus give a sworn statement that he watched at least one of the smaller boys get on the bus the next day?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Kermit on March 03, 2008, 03:37:32 PM
(http://img218.imageshack.us/img218/7236/image449bt0.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: private eye on March 03, 2008, 03:39:58 PM
Any estimations as to the dimensions and weight of the cage, or based upon the general conditions of the cage, coral build up, rust, etc. how long the cage had been submersed? It looked awfully large, but water can distort sizes to a certain extent. It looked a lot larger than the cages that would have been at the fishermans hut.

The trap was symmetrical in width and length at approximately 7.5 ft. It was approximately 2.25-2.5 ft high.  You're correct about the ROV video lens distorting perspective due to the paralax view lens. 

It may distort sizes but I was amazed at the clarity and resolution of the photo's. Thats why I wish sometime I get to see the film footage on television. I would think you got to view some spectacular sights in general. And the technology involved would make great viewing


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Peaches on March 03, 2008, 03:40:44 PM
Yes, PI, he did.  Early on, we were told the two youngest boys were in Anita.  Someone said they checked with the airline.  BS. 

The whereabouts of the boys is questionable.  First, they were with Anita.  Later, when Paulus needed them for an alibi, suddenly Anita was in Holland alone.

That's my story and I'm sticking to it. 



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Peaches on March 03, 2008, 03:42:35 PM
Any estimations as to the dimensions and weight of the cage, or based upon the general conditions of the cage, coral build up, rust, etc. how long the cage had been submersed? It looked awfully large, but water can distort sizes to a certain extent. It looked a lot larger than the cages that would have been at the fishermans hut.

The trap was symmetrical in width and length at approximately 7.5 ft. It was approximately 2.25-2.5 ft high.  You're correct about the ROV video lens distorting perspective due to the paralax view lens. 

So could two adults pick it up and move it without a crane?  As in, to move it from the area near the Fisherman's Huts to the water....not too far.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: private eye on March 03, 2008, 03:42:56 PM
At your age and at the pace the technology is developing, you will get to discover the last frontier on earth, the ocean floor. That should make for a very exciting and rewarding career.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Kat_Gram on March 03, 2008, 03:43:20 PM
I am happy with the explanation from OE. I did read Kyle's CV when I first learned his name. This was not a haphazard search by amateurs. Certainly is alot of mis communication on these blogs.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Spock on March 03, 2008, 03:43:21 PM
Any estimations as to the dimensions and weight of the cage, or based upon the general conditions of the cage, coral build up, rust, etc. how long the cage had been submersed? It looked awfully large, but water can distort sizes to a certain extent. It looked a lot larger than the cages that would have been at the fishermans hut.

The trap was symmetrical in width and length at approximately 7.5 ft. It was approximately 2.25-2.5 ft high.  You're correct about the ROV video lens distorting perspective due to the paralax view lens. 

OE, the question everyone wants answered is:

Were there human remains and clothing remnants in the trap?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: oceanexploration on March 03, 2008, 03:43:26 PM
Allow me to reiterate in case you missed my previous posting about our leaving and the pics at BFN:

John sent the pics to his sister who is an active poster at BFN.  I had nothing to due with it, I was traveling.  It wasn't intended to snub anyone, nor was there any harm intended by anyone.  I am not involved in the fund raising, nor do I wish to be. 
The views posted by anyone other than the search team does not reflect the views or opinions of the search team.  I've done my best to keep the blog updated and reflective of our views.  Recently, (past several weeks) my plate was overflowing and the blog suffered as a result in terms of content.  However, it is still carefully constructed and every word is in it's proper purposeful context. 
I will continue to keep it updated with news and updates as they unfold and as things develop. 



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 03, 2008, 03:43:42 PM
OE how long does it take to locate a given target with the rover-on average, assuming the boat is relatively close to it. How fast can it descend into the depths? And what about the density of the remaining targets, are they close, scattered, clustered, radom?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Peaches on March 03, 2008, 03:45:04 PM
I am happy with the explanation from OE. I did read Kyle's CV when I first learned his name. This was not a haphazard search by amateurs. Certainly is alot of mis communication on these blogs.

Me, too. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: oceanexploration on March 03, 2008, 03:46:22 PM
I have to run out for the evening.  I'm not commenting more at this time about the trap or it's contents. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: private eye on March 03, 2008, 03:46:24 PM
Underwater construction, discovering lost worlds, fortunes on shipwrecks, and or recovering victims. You'll be part of the generations that robs the oceans of her secrets, with a direct involvement and a front row seat:)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: JE on March 03, 2008, 03:46:55 PM
One more time. You cannot call an airline and ask who WAS on a plane.  They will not tell you because 1) they aren't allowed to 2) it's none of your business 3) the person you talk to does not have that information anyway.  If you fly on Monday, 24 hours later, flight information is now past date....all of it.  You can't even tell if it was on time or not once 24hours passes. 

If you call the airline, they don't know you from Adam's housecat.  They are not and cannot say with 100% certainty that someone is on an airplane.  They can tell you whether or not someone is "checked in" which is not the same as whose butt in the seat, assuming there is a butt in the seat.  They can tell you who has a reservation (but they're not really supposed to and you best have a good story if you think you're going to get that information.) 

Since 9/11, I would imagine things have changed somewhat.   Rules about passenger information and privacy are probably tighter than they used to be. 

My point is we really don't know if the two younger Sloots were with Anita in Holland or not.  Calling KLM a couple weeks later is not going to net you that information because the records are long gone by then.  I'm sure a subpoena would be necessary to obtain the information from microfiche (this is where the info used to go).   

Didn't Paulus give a sworn statement that he watched at least one of the smaller boys get on the bus the next day?

from june 23 PV

 To your question whether Sebastian and Valentijn went to school
that Monday, I can state the following. Yes, they got onto the bus
and went to school because in the period that Anita was away they
took the bus every day.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Peaches on March 03, 2008, 03:47:18 PM
I have to run out for the evening.  I'm not commenting more at this time about the trap or it's contents. 

Thank you, Kyle.  Have a great evening. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: private eye on March 03, 2008, 03:48:52 PM
Ocean Ex

I think you already know how I feel, but I think you did a great job, sincerely.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 03, 2008, 03:48:52 PM
(http://img218.imageshack.us/img218/7236/image449bt0.jpg)

Yes, and on the off-ship interview he says "it looked like a skull, still looks like a skull."  Did they interview him before or after video #3 of the tactile recovery that was shot on Jan 7th?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Magnolia on March 03, 2008, 03:48:56 PM
There were three ROV dive videos of the trap.  Video 1 : 29th Dec - ROV visual inspection of the trap.  (very small clip of this video on Dateline).  Remember, the Dateline footage was taken over our shoulders by filming the ROV monitor.  The footage is not the recorded ROV footage.
Video 2: Dec 30th - ROV and Diver visual-only inspection of trap.  This is the dive Dateline and Tim Miller witnessed, also the dive footage the screen captures I made came from that were posted by Robin at BNH.  I sent these 6 screen shots to the FBI and the FBI only. I was shocked to see them posted.  I thought we had a security breach on the boat from my workstation or a leak from the FBI.  Turns out the FBI gave them to Dave H. after he couldn't get them from me.  After Tim Miller told Dave that we found her in a trap with 99.9% certainty (this is pre-diver inspection), Dave very reasonably requested them from me.  I badly wanted to send them to him, but couldn't.  Apparently, shortly therafter the FBI send the screen shots to Dave anyway, and therefore Robin had them. 

What you all really didn't know (nor Tim Miller when he said his statements to the press, neither Dateline NBC when they broadcasted their lovely special):

Video 3:  Jan 7th - ROV monitoring diver tactile inspection of the trap with sampling of items inside and outside of trap.  The trap was not recovered.  Recovered samples sent for forensic analysis.  Neither Tim Miller nor the media were on board.

The trap in Video 1-3 was found from the first conducted ROV dive.  I found the target at 1:46 am on Christmas morning.  It was my #1 ranked priority target and therefore the first of the ROV dive series. 

Several hours of footage were of other dives on other targets.  None were of any relevance. Most targets were of peculiar coral pinnacles, man-made debris, and ship wrecks.

Why did the Persistence not get more TV time on the Dateline. I was expecting an hour long special on the workings of the boat, and I assume there were literally hundreds of hours of film footage that would have made fascinating television viewing?


Were it not for Ocean we would have not known a thing going on in the waters
of Aruba, except what Legally Lex chose to post at BFN.
He did his best to give us some insight.  I am grateful.
 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Kermit on March 03, 2008, 03:52:01 PM
(http://img223.imageshack.us/img223/5150/kyleze7.jpg)

Kyle is this you?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Spock on March 03, 2008, 03:52:46 PM
I have to run out for the evening.  I'm not commenting more at this time about the trap or it's contents. 

1. Why not? You must be aware there is more speculation than facts in these forums.

2. If you refuse to comment on the contents we will have to assume, remains were found and your response is a legalistic "no comment"


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on March 03, 2008, 03:52:56 PM
Guess I'll need Anna to show me how to properly bring a post forward from the last thread...I always screw it up  ::MonkeyWaa::

Destiny
If it is near page 50, before you click 'post,' copy the whole thing. 
If we have moved on to the new thread, simply click reply, then "paste' it into the box and hit post.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 03, 2008, 03:57:37 PM
There were three ROV dive videos of the trap.  Video 1 : 29th Dec - ROV visual inspection of the trap.  (very small clip of this video on Dateline).  Remember, the Dateline footage was taken over our shoulders by filming the ROV monitor.  The footage is not the recorded ROV footage.
Video 2: Dec 30th - ROV and Diver visual-only inspection of trap.  This is the dive Dateline and Tim Miller witnessed, also the dive footage the screen captures I made came from that were posted by Robin at BNH.  I sent these 6 screen shots to the FBI and the FBI only. I was shocked to see them posted.  I thought we had a security breach on the boat from my workstation or a leak from the FBI.  Turns out the FBI gave them to Dave H. after he couldn't get them from me.  After Tim Miller told Dave that we found her in a trap with 99.9% certainty (this is pre-diver inspection), Dave very reasonably requested them from me.  I badly wanted to send them to him, but couldn't.  Apparently, shortly therafter the FBI send the screen shots to Dave anyway, and therefore Robin had them. 

What you all really didn't know (nor Tim Miller when he said his statements to the press, neither Dateline NBC when they broadcasted their lovely special):

Video 3:  Jan 7th - ROV monitoring diver tactile inspection of the trap with sampling of items inside and outside of trap.  The trap was not recovered.  Recovered samples sent for forensic analysis.  Neither Tim Miller nor the media were on board.

The trap in Video 1-3 was found from the first conducted ROV dive.  I found the target at 1:46 am on Christmas morning.  It was my #1 ranked priority target and therefore the first of the ROV dive series. 

Several hours of footage were of other dives on other targets.  None were of any relevance. Most targets were of peculiar coral pinnacles, man-made debris, and ship wrecks.

Why did the Persistence not get more TV time on the Dateline. I was expecting an hour long special on the workings of the boat, and I assume there were literally hundreds of hours of film footage that would have made fascinating television viewing?


Were it not for Ocean we would have not known a thing going on in the waters
of Aruba, except what Legally Lex chose to post at BFN.
He did his best to give us some insight.  I am grateful.
 

Does anyone have those press statements made by Tim Miller that OE is refering to above??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: private eye on March 03, 2008, 03:57:53 PM
I have to run out for the evening.  I'm not commenting more at this time about the trap or it's contents. 

1. Why not? You must be aware there is more speculation than facts in these forums.

2. If you refuse to comment on the contents we will have to assume, remains were found and your response is a legalistic "no comment"

He has told us what he could, and we really shouldn't pressure him to disclose more. He wants to be friendly and helpful, but he has boundaries imposed on him. I say we just enjoy his conversation when he feels free to talk to us.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Tater on March 03, 2008, 04:02:32 PM
I have to run out for the evening.  I'm not commenting more at this time about the trap or it's contents. 

1. Why not? You must be aware there is more speculation than facts in these forums.

2. If you refuse to comment on the contents we will have to assume, remains were found and your response is a legalistic "no comment"

I would think not talking about this might just be a way to increase their safety and keep open the invitation of returning back to Aruba if and when they continue the search?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Peaches on March 03, 2008, 04:02:33 PM
I have to run out for the evening.  I'm not commenting more at this time about the trap or it's contents. 

1. Why not? You must be aware there is more speculation than facts in these forums.

2. If you refuse to comment on the contents we will have to assume, remains were found and your response is a legalistic "no comment"

He has told us what he could, and we really shouldn't pressure him to disclose more. He wants to be friendly and helpful, but he has boundaries imposed on him. I say we just enjoy his conversation when he feels free to talk to us.

Thank you.

Don't make me drag out the dead horse.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Kermit on March 03, 2008, 04:02:35 PM
(http://img225.imageshack.us/img225/9199/skullxf5.jpg)

looks like a skull to moi



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: cubbeegirl on March 03, 2008, 04:05:16 PM
"Field Project Manager, Geophysical Engineer and Marine Geologist on board the R/V Persistence. Responsible for side scan sonar acquisition, digital processing, analysis, and target identification and location. I will assist in side scan sonar operation and guide the ROV (remotely operated vehicle) team to each sonar target after I pick and analyse each sonar target."

http://geosolutions.blogspot.com/

Hardly a cabin boy.

I do not doubt for one minute that Kyle is very qualified in his profession ... I do not doubt for one minute that Kyle motives in locating the remains of Natalee Hollway were very sincere.

However ... somewhere along the way Kyle was influenced to believe that those within the Aruban investigation were the "good guys" and ... the media which was the sole reason that the Natalee Holloway case did not become a faded memory was the "bad guy".

The following post spoke volumes to me in regards to Kyle naïveté in regards to the dynamics encompassing the "powers that be" in the Aruban investigation who have been behind the coverup which has been denying Natalee Holloway justice.

I cannot comprehend that Kyle would have posted the following words if he had done his homework.  If only he had read Dave Holloway's ... Corruption in Paradise or ... Beth Holloway's ... Loving Natalee.

In November, 2005 ... Dave Holloway conceded that his cooperation with the enemy had not worked.  Dave learned that his goal for justice to prevail for his precious daughter did not reflect ... the Aruban goal to distance Joran and Paulus from implication.

Janet

++++++++

oceanexploration
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #715 1/25 -
« Reply #103 on: January 26, 2008, 12:38:25 PM »


Thought you all may find this interesting if you're willing to accept it-

To date, the Aruban police and dive team has been a tremendous help.  They've honestly done a great job. Over the last month we've established a very good working relationship based on openness and trust.  Most of the relationship success was due to getting the media out of the way and working together shoulder to shoulder over time.  We've helped each other however and whenever we can.  They've treated us with decency and respect and we have treated them as friends and allies, which they are. Most of the police and divers are new since this case started and both eager and careful to do things right.  I wish we had a month ahead of the project just to establish the relationships and trust. I know many of you would likely doubt this view, but it's based on the experiences in the field of the entire search team. I too was extremely worried, paranoid, and suspecting in the beginning.  Now, it's clear we're all working towards a common goal.


Dave Holloway
On the Record w/ Greta
November 17, 2005


HOLLOWAY: ... I made sure that the prime minister understood our position. You know, I had been holding off on this boycott as long as I could, and I told him, I said, you know, The big wave is coming, and if you guys are not going to listen, I can't help you anymore.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,175925,00.html


Dave Holloway
On the Record w/ Greta
April 11, 2006


HOLLOWAY: Oh, the media was our best friend. If it hadn't been for the media this thing would have been swept under the table the very first day and we'd have been calling back to Aruba "Have you heard anything? Have you heard anything?" I truly believe that.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,191377,00.html


I have done my homework. Not all that I posted is geared journalistically.  Some things I had written were specifically geared to send a message.  At times, this message was for only a few people.  This post at SM "praising Aruban authorities" was done with contextual purpose. Eveything I write ends up being read by people who are extremely interested and close to the case.  In context, we (the search team) needed to rapidly gain the trust and cooperation of the Aruban authorities.  Before we arrived, here was no trust, little cooperation, and no sharing of information. Take this for what it's worth:  Keep your friends close and your enemies closer.  Also, don't make assumptions about what I have or have not read.

Not all that I write is my true feelings but is aimed at true purpose. Not everything is clear or should be taken just at face value.


God Bless you Kyle and the rest of the crew for all you have done....
My granny always used that little ditty, "keep your friends close and your enemies closer"...
It has served me well many times in life.....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Flipper/Donnie29 on March 03, 2008, 04:05:47 PM
(http://img225.imageshack.us/img225/9199/skullxf5.jpg)

looks like a skull to moi



Creepy picture..

Do you know when it was taken?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 03, 2008, 04:05:53 PM
(http://img225.imageshack.us/img225/9199/skullxf5.jpg)

looks like a skull to moi


To the left or right?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Kermit on March 03, 2008, 04:06:10 PM
I have to run out for the evening.  I'm not commenting more at this time about the trap or it's contents. 

1. Why not? You must be aware there is more speculation than facts in these forums.

2. If you refuse to comment on the contents we will have to assume, remains were found and your response is a legalistic "no comment"

He has told us what he could, and we really shouldn't pressure him to disclose more. He wants to be friendly and helpful, but he has boundaries imposed on him. I say we just enjoy his conversation when he feels free to talk to us.

Thank you.

Don't make me drag out the dead horse.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zxGejqxN2WY


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Magnolia on March 03, 2008, 04:06:34 PM
Wow...Mr. Frog!

Sure looks like a skull.
Is that from one of the fab 6 pictures?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: cubbeegirl on March 03, 2008, 04:06:35 PM
I have to run out for the evening.  I'm not commenting more at this time about the trap or it's contents. 

1. Why not? You must be aware there is more speculation than facts in these forums.

2. If you refuse to comment on the contents we will have to assume, remains were found and your response is a legalistic "no comment"

He has told us what he could, and we really shouldn't pressure him to disclose more. He wants to be friendly and helpful, but he has boundaries imposed on him. I say we just enjoy his conversation when he feels free to talk to us.

Thank you.

Don't make me drag out the dead horse.


Peaches and PI......YUP!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: NM on March 03, 2008, 04:07:06 PM
Thanks (you sound like a dh  to me) old friend of the family.  Anyway that, I thought was part of the female anatomy from the way he was talking.  Trying to keep up with the old and new sayings.  Not too good at either.   Thanks, Jack
Hi Jackb,
Eww. I'm glad I got you on the right track.

dh?  is that a designated hitter ::MonkeyLaugh::
I'm always giving my bf a tough time, he likes an American league baseball team, I like National league where the pitchers go to bat, and stike out, but at least it makes them think twice about throwing a bean ball!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Kermit on March 03, 2008, 04:07:31 PM
Flipper,

It was taken Dec 29, 2007.


Welcome to the Scared Monkeys forum.

ribbit



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Kermit on March 03, 2008, 04:09:40 PM
Wow...Mr. Frog!

Sure looks like a skull.
Is that from one of the fab 6 pictures?

Yes.

And Miss Magnolia, my condolences on the loss of your beloved Henry, but being able to have resolution is good.  I had a special cocker spaniel that looked exactly like the lady in the film 'Lady and the Tramp' once. One day, I'll get another one.





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Spock on March 03, 2008, 04:10:26 PM
Any estimations as to the dimensions and weight of the cage, or based upon the general conditions of the cage, coral build up, rust, etc. how long the cage had been submersed? It looked awfully large, but water can distort sizes to a certain extent. It looked a lot larger than the cages that would have been at the fishermans hut.

The trap was symmetrical in width and length at approximately 7.5 ft. It was approximately 2.25-2.5 ft high.  You're correct about the ROV video lens distorting perspective due to the paralax view lens. 

OE, the question everyone wants answered is:

Were there human remains and clothing remnants in the trap?

If no remains were found, why doesnt he just say that?

The "thumbs down" signal did come very fast.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Peaches on March 03, 2008, 04:11:48 PM
(http://bestsmileys.com/oneofakind/1.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Kermit on March 03, 2008, 04:13:00 PM
(http://img227.imageshack.us/img227/70/image451zs5.jpg)

Original - I just cropped out the skull looking area and blew it up


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Kermit on March 03, 2008, 04:13:33 PM
(http://bestsmileys.com/oneofakind/1.gif)

ROFLMAO! ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Blonde on March 03, 2008, 04:13:48 PM
Quote from faithMS

I was catching up this morning and came across the above post and found it odd that it was asked the pics not leave BFN as IF  no one but BFN members are the only ones that care, have supported, donated, spent endless hours..etc ..on and on.

It's just odd to me that the pics of the Persistence photos leaving Aruba have been requested to stay on BFN.


 ::MonkeyEek::

That was so Debbie could post them on youtube


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Magnolia on March 03, 2008, 04:14:36 PM
Wow...Mr. Frog!

Sure looks like a skull.
Is that from one of the fab 6 pictures?

Yes.

And Miss Magnolia, my condolences on the loss of your beloved Henry, but being able to have resolution is good.  I had a special cocker spaniel that looked exactly like the lady in the film 'Lady and the Tramp' once. One day, I'll get another one.



That is how my boy looked too.  He was so smart and very refined.
One of the best people I have had in my life.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Spock on March 03, 2008, 04:14:38 PM
(http://bestsmileys.com/oneofakind/1.gif)
The horse isnt dead until we get some answers.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Destiny on March 03, 2008, 04:15:54 PM
Guess I'll need Anna to show me how to properly bring a post forward from the last thread...I always screw it up  ::MonkeyWaa::

Destiny
If it is near page 50, before you click 'post,' copy the whole thing. 
If we have moved on to the new thread, simply click reply, then "paste' it into the box and hit post.

Thank You!... ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Kermit on March 03, 2008, 04:17:37 PM
Wow...Mr. Frog!

Sure looks like a skull.
Is that from one of the fab 6 pictures?

Yes.

And Miss Magnolia, my condolences on the loss of your beloved Henry, but being able to have resolution is good.  I had a special cocker spaniel that looked exactly like the lady in the film 'Lady and the Tramp' once. One day, I'll get another one.



That is how my boy looked too.  He was so smart and very refined.
One of the best people I have had in my life.

And they are smart aren't they?

Mine could sniff out a chocolate candy bar a mile away and find a way to unwrap it.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Kermit on March 03, 2008, 04:18:27 PM
(http://bestsmileys.com/oneofakind/1.gif)
The horse isnt dead until we get some answers.

Perhaps there is a reason the answers are not yet forthcoming eh?

ribbit


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Spock on March 03, 2008, 04:18:31 PM
(http://img227.imageshack.us/img227/70/image451zs5.jpg)

Original - I just cropped out the skull looking area and blew it up
Could be a rock, I understand thats comment practice to add weights to the traps.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: AZSunny on March 03, 2008, 04:20:25 PM
Any estimations as to the dimensions and weight of the cage, or based upon the general conditions of the cage, coral build up, rust, etc. how long the cage had been submersed? It looked awfully large, but water can distort sizes to a certain extent. It looked a lot larger than the cages that would have been at the fishermans hut.

The trap was symmetrical in width and length at approximately 7.5 ft. It was approximately 2.25-2.5 ft high.  You're correct about the ROV video lens distorting perspective due to the paralax view lens. 

OE, the question everyone wants answered is:

Were there human remains and clothing remnants in the trap?

If no remains were found, why doesnt he just say that?

The "thumbs down" signal did come very fast.

Spock,  this is not within his authority.  He was upset the pictures were sent to the internet. I am sure he signed an agreement.  He is not the 'official spokesman' for the FBI or for the ALE or MOS!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Tater on March 03, 2008, 04:21:49 PM
Speaking of youtube here.I found a couple of disturbing videos of a man and woman claiming to have all this information that Beth isn't telling the truth concerning her flight time into Aruba,Natalee being pregnant with Jugs baby,just bunches of balony.I wonder why Beth or Jug can't sue the pants off of them for malicious slander and the like.Seems pretty much like it would be in the bag as far as winning.Why let someone like that get away with this? It made me so mad I had to shut the thing off... :evil:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Destiny on March 03, 2008, 04:22:06 PM
Allow me to reiterate in case you missed my previous posting about our leaving and the pics at BFN:

John sent the pics to his sister who is an active poster at BFN.  I had nothing to due with it, I was traveling.  It wasn't intended to snub anyone, nor was there any harm intended by anyone.  I am not involved in the fund raising, nor do I wish to be. 
The views posted by anyone other than the search team does not reflect the views or opinions of the search team.  I've done my best to keep the blog updated and reflective of our views.  Recently, (past several weeks) my plate was overflowing and the blog suffered as a result in terms of content.  However, it is still carefully constructed and every word is in it's proper purposeful context. 
I will continue to keep it updated with news and updates as they unfold and as things develop. 



These few words speak * volumes * to me...OE is one crafty Monkey...I respect that...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: AZSunny on March 03, 2008, 04:22:09 PM
(http://bestsmileys.com/oneofakind/1.gif)

ROFLMAO! ::MonkeyLaugh::

Peaches, it has been awhile..I kind of missed that horse!  LOL


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Jo-An on March 03, 2008, 04:22:37 PM
Beth will be on Jensen show tomorrow but..... tonite Peter R de Vries will be on!!!
Starts in 10 mins!!!!!!  ::MonkeyDance::
Will keep you updated.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: klaasend on March 03, 2008, 04:25:26 PM
Speaking of youtube here.I found a couple of disturbing videos of a man and woman claiming to have all this information that Beth isn't telling the truth concerning her flight time into Aruba,Natalee being pregnant with Jugs baby,just bunches of balony.I wonder why Beth or Jug can't sue the pants off of them for malicious slander and the like.Seems pretty much like it would be in the bag as far as winning.Why let someone like that get away with this? It made me so mad I had to shut the thing off... :evil:

Yes we are well aware of those two and the video.  All total fabrications.  FYI, Beth and Jug are well aware of it too  ::MonkeyWink:: ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: klaasend on March 03, 2008, 04:26:28 PM
Beth will be on Jensen show tomorrow but..... tonite Peter R de Vries will be on!!!
Starts in 10 mins!!!!!!  ::MonkeyDance::
Will keep you updated.

Jo-An  - Thanks!  I heard Beth will also be on Paul & Wittman (sp) tomorrow.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Spock on March 03, 2008, 04:26:31 PM
Any estimations as to the dimensions and weight of the cage, or based upon the general conditions of the cage, coral build up, rust, etc. how long the cage had been submersed? It looked awfully large, but water can distort sizes to a certain extent. It looked a lot larger than the cages that would have been at the fishermans hut.

The trap was symmetrical in width and length at approximately 7.5 ft. It was approximately 2.25-2.5 ft high.  You're correct about the ROV video lens distorting perspective due to the paralax view lens. 

OE, the question everyone wants answered is:

Were there human remains and clothing remnants in the trap?

If no remains were found, why doesnt he just say that?

The "thumbs down" signal did come very fast.

Spock,  this is not within his authority.  He was upset the pictures were sent to the internet. I am sure he signed an agreement.  He is not the 'official spokesman' for the FBI or for the ALE or MOS!

I think you are right, nothing found. All photos and info the property of the exploration team. Enough said. No skull, no body, no remnants. He signed a privacy agrrement with intellectual property rights.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: dsmith on March 03, 2008, 04:26:32 PM
well I had a really nice talk with my brother  I have mentioned before that he is a commerical fisherman from way up the northeast coast  He knows alot about crab pots as they are called  I hope no one minds that I sent them to him and waiting to see what he thinks of it  But so far what he has told me is this:   

crab pots are made of cold rolled steel, mesh, framed door and funnels for what ever you are wanting to catch can get in.  They put zinc on them to keep them from rusting.  They have different sizes;  7ft x 8ft weighs about 1000lbs,  7ft x 7ft weighs about 800lbs, the old timers had ones that were 4ft x 5ft about 300lbs and did push them off the boat by hand.  If you wanted to take one and put it on the ocean bottom you would need a commerical fishing boat at least 25ft with a wench so you can pick it up.   He also said that if you wanted young strong guys to do it, it would take about 5 or 6 and you would have to bait them with something to get them to do it. LOL  They are very hard to move from say a beach or boat with out the right equipment.  If you wanted to put something say in a pot on the bottom and did not have a big boat or the right equipment you could just get a diver with scuba dive gear to go say 90ft


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Magnolia on March 03, 2008, 04:27:03 PM
Allow me to reiterate in case you missed my previous posting about our leaving and the pics at BFN:

John sent the pics to his sister who is an active poster at BFN.  I had nothing to due with it, I was traveling.  It wasn't intended to snub anyone, nor was there any harm intended by anyone.  I am not involved in the fund raising, nor do I wish to be. 
The views posted by anyone other than the search team does not reflect the views or opinions of the search team.  I've done my best to keep the blog updated and reflective of our views.  Recently, (past several weeks) my plate was overflowing and the blog suffered as a result in terms of content.  However, it is still carefully constructed and every word is in it's proper purposeful context. 
I will continue to keep it updated with news and updates as they unfold and as things develop. 



These few words speak * volumes * to me...OE is one crafty Monkey...I respect that...

I agree, Destiny.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: AZSunny on March 03, 2008, 04:29:39 PM
Any estimations as to the dimensions and weight of the cage, or based upon the general conditions of the cage, coral build up, rust, etc. how long the cage had been submersed? It looked awfully large, but water can distort sizes to a certain extent. It looked a lot larger than the cages that would have been at the fishermans hut.

The trap was symmetrical in width and length at approximately 7.5 ft. It was approximately 2.25-2.5 ft high.  You're correct about the ROV video lens distorting perspective due to the paralax view lens. 

OE, the question everyone wants answered is:

Were there human remains and clothing remnants in the trap?

If no remains were found, why doesnt he just say that?

The "thumbs down" signal did come very fast.

Spock,  this is not within his authority.  He was upset the pictures were sent to the internet. I am sure he signed an agreement.  He is not the 'official spokesman' for the FBI or for the ALE or MOS!

I think you are right, nothing found. All photos and info the property of the exploration team. Enough said. No skull, no body, no remnants. He signed a privacy agrrement with intellectual property rights.

Yes, except Spock...I think remains were found.  I am just not sure whose remains they were.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: klaasend on March 03, 2008, 04:30:09 PM
well I had a really nice talk with my brother  I have mentioned before that he is a commerical fisherman from way up the northeast coast  He knows alot about crab pots as they are called  I hope no one minds that I sent them to him and waiting to see what he thinks of it  But so far what he has told me is this:   

crab pots are made of cold rolled steel, mesh, framed door and funnels for what ever you are wanting to catch can get in.  They put zinc on them to keep them from rusting.  They have different sizes;  7ft x 8ft weighs about 1000lbs,  7ft x 7ft weighs about 800lbs, the old timers had ones that were 4ft x 5ft about 300lbs and did push them off the boat by hand.  If you wanted to take one and put it on the ocean bottom you would need a commerical fishing boat at least 25ft with a wench so you can pick it up.   He also said that if you wanted young strong guys to do it, it would take about 5 or 6 and you would have to bait them with something to get them to do it. LOL  They are very hard to move from say a beach or boat with out the right equipment.  If you wanted to put something say in a pot on the bottom and did not have a big boat or the right equipment you could just get a diver with scuba dive gear to go say 90ft

Thanks, makes sense.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: SunnyinTX on March 03, 2008, 04:30:09 PM
I have to run out for the evening.  I'm not commenting more at this time about the trap or it's contents. 

1. Why not? You must be aware there is more speculation than facts in these forums.

2. If you refuse to comment on the contents we will have to assume, remains were found and your response is a legalistic "no comment"

He has told us what he could, and we really shouldn't pressure him to disclose more. He wants to be friendly and helpful, but he has boundaries imposed on him. I say we just enjoy his conversation when he feels free to talk to us.

I agree.....and it might be a good idea to go back read  a couple of his posts today...he really gave us LOTS of info in those posts ::MonkeyWink::  OE God Bless you and everyone connected with this venture...y'all really are heroes!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Rob on March 03, 2008, 04:30:33 PM
(http://bestsmileys.com/oneofakind/1.gif)
The horse isnt dead until we get some answers.

Perhaps there is a reason the answers are not yet forthcoming eh?

ribbit

Hi Kerm, I can only hope along with everyone else.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Tater on March 03, 2008, 04:31:10 PM
Speaking of youtube here.I found a couple of disturbing videos of a man and woman claiming to have all this information that Beth isn't telling the truth concerning her flight time into Aruba,Natalee being pregnant with Jugs baby,just bunches of balony.I wonder why Beth or Jug can't sue the pants off of them for malicious slander and the like.Seems pretty much like it would be in the bag as far as winning.Why let someone like that get away with this? It made me so mad I had to shut the thing off... :evil:

Yes we are well aware of those two and the video.  All total fabrications.  FYI, Beth and Jug are well aware of it too  ::MonkeyWink:: ::MonkeyWink::


Good then...Seems like obstruction of justice could be thrown in there as well..I just can't get over some of the things people will do to create pain for someone else..I'm so angry now I have heartburn!!! Geesh,it's pure unadulterated evil... :smt096


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 03, 2008, 04:31:12 PM
Any estimations as to the dimensions and weight of the cage, or based upon the general conditions of the cage, coral build up, rust, etc. how long the cage had been submersed? It looked awfully large, but water can distort sizes to a certain extent. It looked a lot larger than the cages that would have been at the fishermans hut.

The trap was symmetrical in width and length at approximately 7.5 ft. It was approximately 2.25-2.5 ft high.  You're correct about the ROV video lens distorting perspective due to the paralax view lens. 

OE, the question everyone wants answered is:

Were there human remains and clothing remnants in the trap?

If no remains were found, why doesnt he just say that?

The "thumbs down" signal did come very fast.

What I do know is that I am 100% confident there is a conch shell in that cage (pic #2 to the right)    ::MonkeyWink::

(http://i27.tinypic.com/anyfco.jpg)

(http://i29.tinypic.com/35ksmdc.jpg)

(http://i31.tinypic.com/ngolxy.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Jo-An on March 03, 2008, 04:31:55 PM
Beth will be on Jensen show tomorrow but..... tonite Peter R de Vries will be on!!!
Starts in 10 mins!!!!!!  ::MonkeyDance::
Will keep you updated.

Jo-An  - Thanks!  I heard Beth will also be on Paul & Wittman (sp) tomorrow.

They will overlap somewhat.
Jensen is on at 10.30-11.15 pm and Pauw & Witteman at 11.00-11.55 pm.
I won't be able to watch both shows. Play rehearsals...  Bummer...




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: AZSunny on March 03, 2008, 04:33:10 PM
well I had a really nice talk with my brother  I have mentioned before that he is a commerical fisherman from way up the northeast coast  He knows alot about crab pots as they are called  I hope no one minds that I sent them to him and waiting to see what he thinks of it  But so far what he has told me is this:   

crab pots are made of cold rolled steel, mesh, framed door and funnels for what ever you are wanting to catch can get in.  They put zinc on them to keep them from rusting.  They have different sizes;  7ft x 8ft weighs about 1000lbs,  7ft x 7ft weighs about 800lbs, the old timers had ones that were 4ft x 5ft about 300lbs and did push them off the boat by hand.  If you wanted to take one and put it on the ocean bottom you would need a commerical fishing boat at least 25ft with a wench so you can pick it up.   He also said that if you wanted young strong guys to do it, it would take about 5 or 6 and you would have to bait them with something to get them to do it. LOL  They are very hard to move from say a beach or boat with out the right equipment.  If you wanted to put something say in a pot on the bottom and did not have a big boat or the right equipment you could just get a diver with scuba dive gear to go say 90ft

Very interesting info...thanks!  So it 'takes a village' to move it, or a scuba diver to access it. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Kermit on March 03, 2008, 04:33:57 PM
Hi Rob



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: private eye on March 03, 2008, 04:34:58 PM
Beth will be on Jensen show tomorrow but..... tonite Peter R de Vries will be on!!!
Starts in 10 mins!!!!!!  ::MonkeyDance::
Will keep you updated.

Please do I hope he mentions the show in Aruba


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: SunnyinTX on March 03, 2008, 04:35:03 PM
Allow me to reiterate in case you missed my previous posting about our leaving and the pics at BFN:

John sent the pics to his sister who is an active poster at BFN.  I had nothing to due with it, I was traveling.  It wasn't intended to snub anyone, nor was there any harm intended by anyone.  I am not involved in the fund raising, nor do I wish to be. 
The views posted by anyone other than the search team does not reflect the views or opinions of the search team.  I've done my best to keep the blog updated and reflective of our views.  Recently, (past several weeks) my plate was overflowing and the blog suffered as a result in terms of content.  However, it is still carefully constructed and every word is in it's proper purposeful context. 
I will continue to keep it updated with news and updates as they unfold and as things develop. 



These few words speak * volumes * to me...OE is one crafty Monkey...I respect that...

Ditto Destiny.....our OE is no dummy ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: AZSunny on March 03, 2008, 04:36:08 PM
Any estimations as to the dimensions and weight of the cage, or based upon the general conditions of the cage, coral build up, rust, etc. how long the cage had been submersed? It looked awfully large, but water can distort sizes to a certain extent. It looked a lot larger than the cages that would have been at the fishermans hut.

The trap was symmetrical in width and length at approximately 7.5 ft. It was approximately 2.25-2.5 ft high.  You're correct about the ROV video lens distorting perspective due to the paralax view lens. 

OE, the question everyone wants answered is:

Were there human remains and clothing remnants in the trap?

If no remains were found, why doesnt he just say that?

The "thumbs down" signal did come very fast.

What I do know is that I am 100% confident there is a conch shell in that cage (pic #2 to the right)    ::MonkeyWink::

(http://i27.tinypic.com/anyfco.jpg)

(http://i29.tinypic.com/35ksmdc.jpg)

(http://i31.tinypic.com/ngolxy.jpg)

 and I see what looks like a carnival mask in picture 3.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: SunnyinTX on March 03, 2008, 04:36:16 PM
Beth will be on Jensen show tomorrow but..... tonite Peter R de Vries will be on!!!
Starts in 10 mins!!!!!!  ::MonkeyDance::
Will keep you updated.

 ::MonkeyDance:: thank you Jo-An.....love Peter!!! 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Jo-An on March 03, 2008, 04:40:42 PM
Beth will be on Jensen show tomorrow but..... tonite Peter R de Vries will be on!!!
Starts in 10 mins!!!!!!  ::MonkeyDance::
Will keep you updated.

 ::MonkeyDance:: thank you Jo-An.....love Peter!!! 

We need a little patience... first up is winner of Idols (Dutch version of American Idol)...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: private eye on March 03, 2008, 04:41:19 PM
Kyle does have a fascinating career in front of him.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: JE on March 03, 2008, 04:42:06 PM
Why i think it s not a skull

Kyle said that the cage was about 2,25-2,5 ft high assuming its 2.5 ft that would make the skull 3.5 inches

(http://i26.tinypic.com/9huu8p.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: SunnyinTX on March 03, 2008, 04:43:34 PM
Beth will be on Jensen show tomorrow but..... tonite Peter R de Vries will be on!!!
Starts in 10 mins!!!!!!  ::MonkeyDance::
Will keep you updated.

 ::MonkeyDance:: thank you Jo-An.....love Peter!!! 

We need a little patience... first up is winner of Idols (Dutch version of American Idol)...


LOL...no problem re: patience...some of us have been here for the pat 2 yr/10 mons....patience we have....it's the answers we are missing@#$%^&&*)%&#&^&*%^*&*&*(^&*(


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: caesu on March 03, 2008, 04:48:15 PM
Beth will be on Jensen show tomorrow but..... tonite Peter R de Vries will be on!!!
Starts in 10 mins!!!!!!  ::MonkeyDance::
Will keep you updated.

 ::MonkeyDance:: thank you Jo-An.....love Peter!!! 

i can't stand jensen but of course i will watch this and tomorrow beth!
i hope peter r. will give a hint of what he is up to next.
but i doubt that, i think he won't show his cards too early.

i am almost sure it will be uploaded to usenet same as all previous jensen shows.
so i watch it from there tomorrow so i can skip the idols appearance.
i might upload it then to youtube if it is not there yet.
mabe i try to add subtitles but i have too study how to do this with a tool like vobsub.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: private eye on March 03, 2008, 04:48:42 PM
Why i think it s not a skull

Kyle said that the cage was about 2,25-2,5 ft high assuming its 2.5 ft that would make the skull 3.5 inches

(http://i26.tinypic.com/9huu8p.jpg)

There would be DNA in it regardless of whether it is a creature of the sea or a human


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: JE on March 03, 2008, 04:53:56 PM
Why i think it s not a skull

Kyle said that the cage was about 2,25-2,5 ft high assuming its 2.5 ft that would make the skull 3.5 inches

(http://i26.tinypic.com/9huu8p.jpg)

There would be DNA in it regardless of whether it is a creature of the sea or a human

If its not a rock


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Magnolia on March 03, 2008, 04:56:36 PM
Can you just imagine the shock?....you send pictures
to the FBI and the next thing you know the pictures
are on the internet.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Shell on March 03, 2008, 04:57:17 PM
(http://bestsmileys.com/oneofakind/1.gif)

ROFLMAO! ::MonkeyLaugh::

Keep that handy Peaches  ::MonkeyLaugh::
Kermit  ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Puzzler on March 03, 2008, 04:58:12 PM
The green close-up picture looks like a skull in the foreground and a tennis shoe in the background, to the right.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Observer on March 03, 2008, 04:58:12 PM
Why i think it s not a skull

Kyle said that the cage was about 2,25-2,5 ft high assuming its 2.5 ft that would make the skull 3.5 inches

(http://i26.tinypic.com/9huu8p.jpg)

Nice job and I agree! That is why they gave a thumbs down when the divers got a closer look I think,although more of that object could be under that white. Like Capslock told us that kind of trap has really no use in the Aruban waters,it was probably discarded on the ocean floor because of that. Possibly even used for other purposes like he stated as well like drug trafficking. However something is still very odd about this trap and its contents!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: FaithMS on March 03, 2008, 04:58:33 PM
Why i think it s not a skull

Kyle said that the cage was about 2,25-2,5 ft high assuming its 2.5 ft that would make the skull 3.5 inches

(http://i26.tinypic.com/9huu8p.jpg)

There would be DNA in it regardless of whether it is a creature of the sea or a human

If its not a rock


Wasn't it reported to be coral?

I cannot see anything that looks like a skull to me.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: caesu on March 03, 2008, 04:58:34 PM
some dutch news to follow in the meantime:

Quote
Nato fears over Dutch Islam film

The film has been condemned by several Muslim countries
Nato's secretary general says he fears the airing of a Dutch film criticising Islam will have repercussions for troops in Afghanistan.

Jaap de Hoop Scheffer's comments came after Afghans protested on Sunday against the film being made by far-right Dutch MP Geert Wilders.

The Dutch government has warned Mr Wilders that the film will damage Dutch political and economic interests.

Mr Wilders says the film is about the Koran but has given few details.

In the past, he has called for the Koran to be banned and likened it to Adolf Hitler's Mein Kampf.

The project has already been condemned by several Muslim countries, including Iran and Pakistan.

Nato's secretary general said he was concerned about his troops after the protests against the film in Afghanistan.

"If the [troops] find themselves in the line of fire because of the film, then I am worried about it and I am expressing that concern," he said in a television interview.

'Kick out forces'

On Sunday, hundreds of Afghans took to the streets in the northern city of Mazar-i-Sharif to protest against the film.

Demonstrators burned Dutch flags, and called for the withdrawal of Dutch troops from the Nato force.

The demonstrators say they will step up their protests unless the Afghan government expels the troops.

The protesters also criticised the recent republication of caricatures of the Prophet Mohammad in several Danish newspapers, and called for the withdrawal of Danish troops.

"We don't want our government to have any diplomatic relations with these two countries," Maulawi Abdul Hadi, one of the protesters, told the Associated Press news agency.

"We don't want Danish and Dutch troops in Afghanistan. They should be kicked out of the Nato forces here."

Mr Wilders has said he expects his 15-minute work will be shown in the Netherlands in March and released on the internet.

Dutch authorities have told him he may have to leave the country for his own safety amid reports of death threats.

Submission

Mr Wilders' film is called Fitna, an Arabic word used to describe strife or discord.

He has said his film will show how the Koran is "an inspiration for intolerance, murder and terror".

Mr Wilders leads the Freedom Party, which has nine seats in the Dutch parliament.

He has had police protection since Dutch director Theo Van Gogh was killed by a radical Islamist in 2004.

Van Gogh's film Submission included verses from the Koran shown against a naked female body.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/7274259.stm

The Dutch government fears a lot of trouble at home and abroad as soon as this film gets released this month.

Geert Wilders is leader of the PVV.

Hero Brinkman is of the same political party.

Brinkman called the Antilles and Aruba "a largely corrupt gangsters' nest' and Jan van der Straten, then police chief of Bonaire, threatened to arrest him after the parlaimentary working trip got aborted after Brinkmans comments.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Pita on March 03, 2008, 05:05:48 PM
Can you just imagine the shock?....you send pictures
to the FBI and the next thing you know the pictures
are on the internet.

Just unbelievable is all I can say!!      ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Observer on March 03, 2008, 05:06:08 PM
Brinkman called the Antilles and Aruba "a largely corrupt gangsters' nest' and Jan van der Straten, then police chief of Bonaire, threatened to arrest him after the parlaimentary working trip got aborted after Brinkmans comments.

Not sure if you saw this Caesu? It makes me wonder if that had anything to do with them not extending Van Der Stratens contract in Bonaire?

www.amigoe.com/english/ on February 24


Bonaire still without corps leader

KRALENDIJK – Since Jan van Straten left late January, Bonaire is still without a chief of police.  His contract ran out per February 1.  Justice-minister David Dick (PAR) regrets the fact that the Netherlands didn’t cooperate and let Van der Straten stay a little longer until a new chief of police was appointed.

Van der Straten works for the Dutch police and they decided that he had to go back.
The council of ministers would decide on a new chief of police this month in anticipation of the application committee.  The corps of police is currently led by chief inspector Oscar Obispo.  Minister Dick confirmed this morning that no decision was made yet on the chief of police.  He said two weeks ago:  “We will make sure that Bonaire gets a good chief of police.”


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Magnolia on March 03, 2008, 05:06:33 PM
Hero Brinkman is such a great name for a politician.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Observer on March 03, 2008, 05:12:54 PM
Hero Brinkman is such a great name for a politician.

He looks and talks like a Hero as well..So far anyway.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Peaches on March 03, 2008, 05:14:44 PM
(http://bestsmileys.com/oneofakind/1.gif)

ROFLMAO! ::MonkeyLaugh::

Peaches, it has been awhile..I kind of missed that horse!  LOL

It's a personal favorite of mine...... ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Jo-An on March 03, 2008, 05:15:29 PM
Peter R de Vries on Robert Jensen Show

-talking about the book-incident on DWDD, they show the clip
-tomorrow Beth will be on, pre-recorded, Beth told Robert that she's very grateful to Peter
-behind the scenes a lot going on, investigation re-opened
-Joran still murder-suspect
-cannot be solved within one week, takes time
-Robert could tell that when Joran was on his show, that he was holding back, 99% of the audience felt that too, not that he was lying but he was holding back information, he knew more than he was letting on
-Peter's investigation in 2006, was clear to Peter then that Joran was involved, it's strange that Joran wanted to remain silent, if you're innocent all you want to do is tell the truth, not remain silent. Joran couldn't answer the simplest questions
-Peter asked questions on P&W-show (wine incident) Joran couldn't or wouldn't answer
-Peter's wife said to Anita on P&W-show, while she was helping Peter getting wine out of his eyes: "You educated your son well" in a very sarcastic way
-Peter still talks to Beth on a regular basis


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: caesu on March 03, 2008, 05:16:29 PM
Brinkman called the Antilles and Aruba "a largely corrupt gangsters' nest' and Jan van der Straten, then police chief of Bonaire, threatened to arrest him after the parlaimentary working trip got aborted after Brinkmans comments.

Not sure if you saw this Caesu? It makes me wonder if that had anything to do with them not extending Van Der Stratens contract in Bonaire?

www.amigoe.com/english/ on February 24


Bonaire still without corps leader

KRALENDIJK – Since Jan van Straten left late January, Bonaire is still without a chief of police.  His contract ran out per February 1.  Justice-minister David Dick (PAR) regrets the fact that the Netherlands didn’t cooperate and let Van der Straten stay a little longer until a new chief of police was appointed.

Van der Straten works for the Dutch police and they decided that he had to go back.
The council of ministers would decide on a new chief of police this month in anticipation of the application committee.  The corps of police is currently led by chief inspector Oscar Obispo.  Minister Dick confirmed this morning that no decision was made yet on the chief of police.  He said two weeks ago:  “We will make sure that Bonaire gets a good chief of police.”

yes, i heard that they usually get 3 years contract with possible extension.
that's also why it is very probable that Hans Mos and Dop Kruimel go back to The Netherlands in 2009 and get replaced by new prosecutors (from The Netherlands).
Karin Janssen also had 3 year contract.

so Mos and Kruimel just have to sit their island adventure out. and never come back on the island afterwards.
that's one reason why i find those contract periods so bad. colonial attitude.
but there are not enough qualified arubans to do that job.
or arubans who studied law rather work in the netherlands maybe.

i doubt one is really committed i they have a safe exit strategy anyway.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Peaches on March 03, 2008, 05:18:40 PM
well I had a really nice talk with my brother  I have mentioned before that he is a commerical fisherman from way up the northeast coast  He knows alot about crab pots as they are called  I hope no one minds that I sent them to him and waiting to see what he thinks of it  But so far what he has told me is this:   

crab pots are made of cold rolled steel, mesh, framed door and funnels for what ever you are wanting to catch can get in.  They put zinc on them to keep them from rusting.  They have different sizes;  7ft x 8ft weighs about 1000lbs,  7ft x 7ft weighs about 800lbs, the old timers had ones that were 4ft x 5ft about 300lbs and did push them off the boat by hand.  If you wanted to take one and put it on the ocean bottom you would need a commerical fishing boat at least 25ft with a wench so you can pick it up.   He also said that if you wanted young strong guys to do it, it would take about 5 or 6 and you would have to bait them with something to get them to do it. LOL  They are very hard to move from say a beach or boat with out the right equipment.  If you wanted to put something say in a pot on the bottom and did not have a big boat or the right equipment you could just get a diver with scuba dive gear to go say 90ft

My BIL would be one of the "old timers" and he'd pop ya right in the mouth for saying that!  I think his cage was about  4 x 5.  He did have a winch onboard.  We put overboard to drag for interesting stuff in Cape Cod Bay just for grins. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 03, 2008, 05:20:24 PM
Any estimations as to the dimensions and weight of the cage, or based upon the general conditions of the cage, coral build up, rust, etc. how long the cage had been submersed? It looked awfully large, but water can distort sizes to a certain extent. It looked a lot larger than the cages that would have been at the fishermans hut.

The trap was symmetrical in width and length at approximately 7.5 ft. It was approximately 2.25-2.5 ft high.  You're correct about the ROV video lens distorting perspective due to the paralax view lens. 

Thank you Kyle.

The size of the trap/cage did appear so much larger in the image on Dateline.  The divers appeared very small in comparison.

Janet

+++++++++

Dr. Hodges:

The fisherman described the cage as made of 3/8-inch iron (such as that used in concrete reinforcing—"rebar") with a frame size approximately 5 ½ feet by 4 feet by 17 inches. He described it as a large fishing cage with its frame wrapped in chicken wire with its familiar hexagonal openings but with an opening in one panel which allowed them to trap fish. He believed that, given its size and weight, it would take two men to manage the cage. Once aboard, it would lay low on the floor of the nearby fishing boat.

http://forensicthoughtprints.com/aruba/default.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: JE on March 03, 2008, 05:21:00 PM
Brinkman called the Antilles and Aruba "a largely corrupt gangsters' nest' and Jan van der Straten, then police chief of Bonaire, threatened to arrest him after the parlaimentary working trip got aborted after Brinkmans comments.

Not sure if you saw this Caesu? It makes me wonder if that had anything to do with them not extending Van Der Stratens contract in Bonaire?

www.amigoe.com/english/ on February 24


Bonaire still without corps leader

KRALENDIJK – Since Jan van Straten left late January, Bonaire is still without a chief of police.  His contract ran out per February 1.  Justice-minister David Dick (PAR) regrets the fact that the Netherlands didn’t cooperate and let Van der Straten stay a little longer until a new chief of police was appointed.

Van der Straten works for the Dutch police and they decided that he had to go back.
The council of ministers would decide on a new chief of police this month in anticipation of the application committee.  The corps of police is currently led by chief inspector Oscar Obispo.  Minister Dick confirmed this morning that no decision was made yet on the chief of police.  He said two weeks ago:  “We will make sure that Bonaire gets a good chief of police.”

The reason van der straten wanted to arresr brinkman was for the remarks about them being corrupt. On top of that Brinkman has said something along the lines of: Why havent we sold these islands on marktplaats.nl yet(Marktplaats=something like ebay). Straten said he would arrest him if he made that kind of comments while in Bonaire


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: suisse71 on March 03, 2008, 05:22:24 PM
I have to run out for the evening.  I'm not commenting more at this time about the trap or it's contents. 

1. Why not? You must be aware there is more speculation than facts in these forums.

2. If you refuse to comment on the contents we will have to assume, remains were found and your response is a legalistic "no comment"

He has told us what he could, and we really shouldn't pressure him to disclose more. He wants to be friendly and helpful, but he has boundaries imposed on him. I say we just enjoy his conversation when he feels free to talk to us.

Exactly!   ::MonkeyCool::

Kyle, thank you so much to you and the team.  I really appreciate all that you guys have done and continue to do.  God Bless you and The Persistence team.

j4n!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: JE on March 03, 2008, 05:26:58 PM
Peter R de Vries on Robert Jensen Show

-talking about the book-incident on DWDD, they show the clip
-tomorrow Beth will be on, pre-recorded, Beth told Robert that she's very grateful to Peter
-behind the scenes a lot going on, investigation re-opened
-Joran still murder-suspect
-cannot be solved within one week, takes time
-Robert could tell that when Joran was on his show, that he was holding back, 99% of the audience felt that too, not that he was lying but he was holding back information, he knew more than he was letting on
-Peter's investigation in 2006, was clear to Peter then that Joran was involved, it's strange that Joran wanted to remain silent, if you're innocent all you want to do is tell the truth, not remain silent. Joran couldn't answer the simplest questions
-Peter asked questions on P&W-show (wine incident) Joran couldn't or wouldn't answer
-Peter's wife said to Anita on P&W-show, while she was helping Peter getting wine out of his eyes: "You educated your son well" in a very sarcastic way
-Peter still talks to Beth on a regular basis

At the end he said something about anita and pauls attitude. During the show (P&W) they were defending their son, good boy, nice to people, respectful to girls, etc and that if they had any reason to believe that he was involved they would take him to the police themselves. He then added that this would be a good moment to go see the authorities and have a serious talk.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Observer on March 03, 2008, 05:27:38 PM
Brinkman called the Antilles and Aruba "a largely corrupt gangsters' nest' and Jan van der Straten, then police chief of Bonaire, threatened to arrest him after the parlaimentary working trip got aborted after Brinkmans comments.

The reason van der straten wanted to arresr brinkman was for the remarks about them being corrupt. On top of that Brinkman has said something along the lines of: Why havent we sold these islands on marktplaats.nl yet(Marktplaats=something like ebay). Straten said he would arrest him if he made that kind of comments while in Bonaire

TY! It was said that years ago he worked for Paul Van Der Sloot and that is most likely where they became good friends. We know that Rudy Croes was very upset with wire tapping in June 2005 and we suspect that was between JANVDS and PVDS,We know just from Jorans book that they were probably in contact on a regular basis but I guess that is obvious.

I wonder what Van Der Stratens next assignment will be? We heard last night from Jossy he is in Aruba but not involved in this case.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 03, 2008, 05:30:03 PM
Brinkman called the Antilles and Aruba "a largely corrupt gangsters' nest' and Jan van der Straten, then police chief of Bonaire, threatened to arrest him after the parlaimentary working trip got aborted after Brinkmans comments.

The reason van der straten wanted to arresr brinkman was for the remarks about them being corrupt. On top of that Brinkman has said something along the lines of: Why havent we sold these islands on marktplaats.nl yet(Marktplaats=something like ebay). Straten said he would arrest him if he made that kind of comments while in Bonaire

TY! It was said that years ago he worked for Paul Van Der Sloot and that is most likely where they became good friends. We know that Rudy Croes was very upset with wire tapping in June 2005 and we suspect that was between JANVDS and PVDS,We know just from Jorans book that they were probably in contact on a regular basis but I guess that is obvious.

I wonder what Van Der Stratens next assignment will be? We heard last night from Jossy he is in Aruba but not involved in this case.
Not in any "official capacity" at least!    ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Peaches on March 03, 2008, 05:30:52 PM
Great synopsis, Jo Ann!  Thank you so much.

PS...My tulips are popping up!  Daffodils too. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: dsmith on March 03, 2008, 05:30:59 PM
well I had a really nice talk with my brother  I have mentioned before that he is a commerical fisherman from way up the northeast coast  He knows alot about crab pots as they are called  I hope no one minds that I sent them to him and waiting to see what he thinks of it  But so far what he has told me is this:   

crab pots are made of cold rolled steel, mesh, framed door and funnels for what ever you are wanting to catch can get in.  They put zinc on them to keep them from rusting.  They have different sizes;  7ft x 8ft weighs about 1000lbs,  7ft x 7ft weighs about 800lbs, the old timers had ones that were 4ft x 5ft about 300lbs and did push them off the boat by hand.  If you wanted to take one and put it on the ocean bottom you would need a commerical fishing boat at least 25ft with a wench so you can pick it up.   He also said that if you wanted young strong guys to do it, it would take about 5 or 6 and you would have to bait them with something to get them to do it. LOL  They are very hard to move from say a beach or boat with out the right equipment.  If you wanted to put something say in a pot on the bottom and did not have a big boat or the right equipment you could just get a diver with scuba dive gear to go say 90ft

My BIL would be one of the "old timers" and he'd pop ya right in the mouth for saying that!  I think his cage was about  4 x 5.  He did have a winch onboard.  We put overboard to drag for interesting stuff in Cape Cod Bay just for grins. 

yes I have been popped a few times for saying things out of turn or just speaking my mind  when you drag you never know what you might find maybe some treasure of some sort


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 03, 2008, 05:33:31 PM

Wanted to shout out to our Dutch Monkeys and tell you how much I enjoy reading your posts and appreciate your updates from the media in Holland. Wish we'd had you here from the start and didn't have to get our information from the Dutch trolls who were in the Van der Sloot camp. Welcome!
 

 ::MonkeyWink:: ::MonkeyWink:: ::MonkeyWink::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: GBMW on March 03, 2008, 05:35:02 PM
Beth will be on Jensen show tomorrow but..... tonite Peter R de Vries will be on!!!
Starts in 10 mins!!!!!!  ::MonkeyDance::
Will keep you updated.

 ::MonkeyDance:: thank you Jo-An.....love Peter!!! 

i can't stand jensen but of course i will watch this and tomorrow beth!
i hope peter r. will give a hint of what he is up to next.
but i doubt that, i think he won't show his cards too early.

i am almost sure it will be uploaded to usenet same as all previous jensen shows.
so i watch it from there tomorrow so i can skip the idols appearance.
i might upload it then to youtube if it is not there yet.
mabe i try to add subtitles but i have too study how to do this with a tool like vobsub.

Short summary:
He was just on..nice interview. No real news / scoops; just a conversation about De Wereld Draait Door (not related to Natalee) - wine throwing incident - the Pauw & Witteman interview and that he has regular contact with Beth.

Robert Jensen made the comment that after the confession nothing seemed to have happened. Peter said that before the case was closed, Joran wanted to claim money etc and now the investigation is open again; he is a murdersuspect & that they're working very hard on the case (and the way he said it made it look like he is in contact with people who are doing the investigation...but that's not really a surprise...) but results aren't there overnight.
Peter also stated that after he went to Aruba to investigate, talk to people, see the surroundings were it all happened he was sure that Joran knew more...if you've got nothing to hide / are innocent you don't keep your mouth shut...

They also talked about Jorans' parents...they claimed in the Pauw & Witteman interview they would have brought Joran to the police if they thought that he had something to do with it or knew more...Peter joked: Well they still have to go!




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 03, 2008, 05:35:43 PM
Peter R de Vries on Robert Jensen Show

-talking about the book-incident on DWDD, they show the clip
-tomorrow Beth will be on, pre-recorded, Beth told Robert that she's very grateful to Peter
-behind the scenes a lot going on, investigation re-opened
-Joran still murder-suspect
-cannot be solved within one week, takes time
-Robert could tell that when Joran was on his show, that he was holding back, 99% of the audience felt that too, not that he was lying but he was holding back information, he knew more than he was letting on
-Peter's investigation in 2006, was clear to Peter then that Joran was involved, it's strange that Joran wanted to remain silent, if you're innocent all you want to do is tell the truth, not remain silent. Joran couldn't answer the simplest questions
-Peter asked questions on P&W-show (wine incident) Joran couldn't or wouldn't answer
-Peter's wife said to Anita on P&W-show, while she was helping Peter getting wine out of his eyes: "You educated your son well" in a very sarcastic way
-Peter still talks to Beth on a regular basis


Thanks Jo-An, a lot of good nuggets in there! Love this one:

-Peter's investigation in 2006, was clear to Peter then that Joran was involved, it's strange that Joran wanted to remain silent, if you're innocent all you want to do is tell the truth, not remain silent. Joran couldn't answer the simplest questions


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: ala_gunslinger on March 03, 2008, 05:36:38 PM
Peter R de Vries on Robert Jensen Show

-talking about the book-incident on DWDD, they show the clip
-tomorrow Beth will be on, pre-recorded, Beth told Robert that she's very grateful to Peter
-behind the scenes a lot going on, investigation re-opened
-Joran still murder-suspect
-cannot be solved within one week, takes time
-Robert could tell that when Joran was on his show, that he was holding back, 99% of the audience felt that too, not that he was lying but he was holding back information, he knew more than he was letting on
-Peter's investigation in 2006, was clear to Peter then that Joran was involved, it's strange that Joran wanted to remain silent, if you're innocent all you want to do is tell the truth, not remain silent. Joran couldn't answer the simplest questions
-Peter asked questions on P&W-show (wine incident) Joran couldn't or wouldn't answer
-Peter's wife said to Anita on P&W-show, while she was helping Peter getting wine out of his eyes: "You educated your son well" in a very sarcastic way
-Peter still talks to Beth on a regular basis

At the end he said something about anita and pauls attitude. During the show (P&W) they were defending their son, good boy, nice to people, respectful to girls, etc and that if they had any reason to believe that he was involved they would take him to the police themselves. He then added that this would be a good moment to go see the authorities and have a serious talk.

Good Shot!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Observer on March 03, 2008, 05:36:41 PM
Jo-ann I think you posted about friends of jurin's currently posting that his 2 younger brothers where in Netherlands with avds.  THANK YOU FOR THAT INFO!!!!!!  Many of us here were given that same info in June 2005 by people in aruba and not friends of the people of the ditch (love that name!).  Also a Monkey found out that 3 people of the ditch (3 van der sloots) flew from nl to aruba the day avds said she came home around June 1.  IMO, pvds needed his younger sons home for an alibi and that is when that story change.  Thanks again for posting that info.

Here are the posts from Fok.

Beth Holloway in Jensen tomorrow? I'll have a look.

Quote
kinkajoe
donderdag 28 februari 2008 @ 18:12 (#27)   
         
Op zaterdag 23 februari 2008 15:56 schreef mrBhimself het volgende:
En overigens Anita van der Sloot was helemaal niet in Amerika, maar was samen met haar jongste twee kinderen in Nederland op bezoek bij haar moeder. Je bent wederom eens slecht geinformeerd!

Volgens deze poster was Mw. v.d. Sloot met twee kinderen in Nederland.

 mrBhimself
donderdag 28 februari 2008 @ 18:56 (#28)   
                 
Inderdaad
Don't follow leaders, watch the parking meters

Mr B says: "and by the way, Anita van der Sloot was not at all in America, but with her youngest two children in Holland to visit her mother. You are again very bad informed"

Kinkajoe quotes this sentence in a thread about the brothers and says: "according to this poster Mrs. v.d. Sloot was with two children in Holland".

Mr B came to the thread about the brothers to say: "Indeed, don't follow leaders, watch the parking meters".

Very interesting and that is what many believe that Anita was not in Holland alone. Kind of ridiculous to think she would leave a 10 year old home alone with Joran,especially after the things he does to the middle sibling. I suspect that it wasnt just Joran who was at play while Anita was away!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: JE on March 03, 2008, 05:37:10 PM
Maybe a stupid question but can anyone tell me who Rita is

From PVDS PB june 23

After depositing the money I went home. I cannot exactly remember
what time it was when I got home. I think it was 16.15 hours. According
to me both Rita and Joran where at home.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Observer on March 03, 2008, 05:39:26 PM
Maybe a stupid question but can anyone tell me who Rita is

From PVDS PB june 23

After depositing the money I went home. I cannot exactly remember
what time it was when I got home. I think it was 16.15 hours. According
to me both Rita and Joran where at home.

The Maid


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 03, 2008, 05:39:33 PM

Short summary:
He was just on..nice interview. No real news / scoops; just a conversation about De Wereld Draait Door (not related to Natalee) - wine throwing incident - the Pauw & Witteman interview and that he has regular contact with Beth.

Robert Jensen made the comment that after the confession nothing seemed to have happened. Peter said that before the case was closed, Joran wanted to claim money etc and now the investigation is open again; he is a murdersuspect & that they're working very hard on the case (and the way he said it made it look like he is in contact with people who are doing the investigation...but that's not really a surprise...) but results aren't there overnight.
Peter also stated that after he went to Aruba to investigate, talk to people, see the surroundings were it all happened he was sure that Joran knew more...if you've got nothing to hide / are innocent you don't keep your mouth shut...

They also talked about Jorans' parents...they claimed in the Pauw & Witteman interview they would have brought Joran to the police if they thought that he had something to do with it or knew more...Peter joked: Well they still have to go!



Thanks GMBW and a belated welcome to the board. One thing that has been persistently missing in the Dutch media is the corruption angle in Aruba. It's so damn obvious. I wish they would jump on that more. I hope this is something Peter is working on behind the scenes.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: JE on March 03, 2008, 05:40:32 PM
Maybe a stupid question but can anyone tell me who Rita is

From PVDS PB june 23

After depositing the money I went home. I cannot exactly remember
what time it was when I got home. I think it was 16.15 hours. According
to me both Rita and Joran where at home.

Nevermind the maid srry i asked lol ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: klaasend on March 03, 2008, 05:42:13 PM
Peter R de Vries on Robert Jensen Show

-talking about the book-incident on DWDD, they show the clip
-tomorrow Beth will be on, pre-recorded, Beth told Robert that she's very grateful to Peter
-behind the scenes a lot going on, investigation re-opened
-Joran still murder-suspect
-cannot be solved within one week, takes time
-Robert could tell that when Joran was on his show, that he was holding back, 99% of the audience felt that too, not that he was lying but he was holding back information, he knew more than he was letting on
-Peter's investigation in 2006, was clear to Peter then that Joran was involved, it's strange that Joran wanted to remain silent, if you're innocent all you want to do is tell the truth, not remain silent. Joran couldn't answer the simplest questions
-Peter asked questions on P&W-show (wine incident) Joran couldn't or wouldn't answer
-Peter's wife said to Anita on P&W-show, while she was helping Peter getting wine out of his eyes: "You educated your son well" in a very sarcastic way
-Peter still talks to Beth on a regular basis

At the end he said something about anita and pauls attitude. During the show (P&W) they were defending their son, good boy, nice to people, respectful to girls, etc and that if they had any reason to believe that he was involved they would take him to the police themselves. He then added that this would be a good moment to go see the authorities and have a serious talk.

Thank you Jo-An and JE!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Peaches on March 03, 2008, 05:42:55 PM
Maybe the Dutch media has their hands full over there without bothering with what's going on in Aruba?  Maybe they just don't care?  Is Aruba the black sheep of the family?

I don't know.   


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 03, 2008, 05:43:02 PM

TY! It was said that years ago he worked for Paul Van Der Sloot and that is most likely where they became good friends. We know that Rudy Croes was very upset with wire tapping in June 2005 and we suspect that was between JANVDS and PVDS,We know just from Jorans book that they were probably in contact on a regular basis but I guess that is obvious.

I wonder what Van Der Stratens next assignment will be? We heard last night from Jossy he is in Aruba but not involved in this case.


Any chance they drug Van der Straten's ass back to Holland to allow him to bail himself out of the cover-up? He's an obvious target.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
Post by: Observer on March 03, 2008, 05:44:31 PM
      Maybe a stupid question but can anyone tell me who Rita is

      From PVDS PB june 23

      After depositing the money I went home. I cannot exactly remember
      what time it was when I got home. I think it was 16.15 hours. According
      to me both Rita and Joran where at home.

      The Maid

      However we have this statement as well..Apparently they had 2 maids.


      Amanda PORTOCARRERO (maid) 7/28/2005 Statement:

      born at Narino in Columbia on August 5,1976, of profession living maid (servant) and living Monserat xxxxxxxxx on Aruba. The woman A.Y.GRUESO PORTOCARRERO aforementioned explained:

      - that she knows nothing of an illegal Colombian maid (servant) working at the VDS house.

      - that nobody told her that a maid said that she saw, in the early morning hours of Monday, May 30, 2005 clothing of Joran Van Der Sloot’s with white sand on/under them. [/list]

      MARGARITHA WERLEMAN e.v. DIJKHOFF (MAID) 08/11/05 Statement:

            I have worked ( 8 ) years at family Van Der Sloot. I work as from Monday up to and including Friday for them. I do not work on Saturday and Sunday at family Van Der Sloot. I work daily four (4) hours at family Van Der Sloot. With family VDS, I mean the parents of the detained man "Joran Van Der Sloot". (meaning the suspect "Joran Van Der Sloot"; observation JACOBS).

            On your question if I can tell you specifically when I worked from Monday up to and including Friday at the family Van Der Sloot, I answer the following:
             
            I work on Monday from

      08.00 till 12.00.
      I work on Tuesday from 13.30 till 17.30.
      I work on Wednesday from 13.30 till 17.30.
      I work on Thursday from 13.30 till 15.30
      and I work on Friday from 13.30 till 17.30 at family Van Der Sloot
      As you can see I work daily four (4) hours at family Van Der Sloot with exception of Thursday because then I work only two (2) hours. [/list]


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Ono on March 03, 2008, 05:44:37 PM
      There were three ROV dive videos of the trap.  Video 1 : 29th Dec - ROV visual inspection of the trap.  (very small clip of this video on Dateline).  Remember, the Dateline footage was taken over our shoulders by filming the ROV monitor.  The footage is not the recorded ROV footage.
      Video 2: Dec 30th - ROV and Diver visual-only inspection of trap.  This is the dive Dateline and Tim Miller witnessed, also the dive footage the screen captures I made came from that were posted by Robin at BNH.  I sent these 6 screen shots to the FBI and the FBI only. I was shocked to see them posted.  I thought we had a security breach on the boat from my workstation or a leak from the FBI.  Turns out the FBI gave them to Dave H. after he couldn't get them from me.  After Tim Miller told Dave that we found her in a trap with 99.9% certainty (this is pre-diver inspection), Dave very reasonably requested them from me.  I badly wanted to send them to him, but couldn't.  Apparently, shortly therafter the FBI send the screen shots to Dave anyway, and therefore Robin had them. 

      What you all really didn't know (nor Tim Miller when he said his statements to the press, neither Dateline NBC when they broadcasted their lovely special):

      Video 3:  Jan 7th - ROV monitoring diver tactile inspection of the trap with sampling of items inside and outside of trap.  The trap was not recovered.  Recovered samples sent for forensic analysis.  Neither Tim Miller nor the media were on board.

      The trap in Video 1-3 was found from the first conducted ROV dive.  I found the target at 1:46 am on Christmas morning.  It was my #1 ranked priority target and therefore the first of the ROV dive series. 

      Several hours of footage were of other dives on other targets.  None were of any relevance. Most targets were of peculiar coral pinnacles, man-made debris, and ship wrecks.


      Thank you for taking the time to explain and also thanks, again for all of your work.  I've enjoyed reading your posts.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: AZSunny on March 03, 2008, 05:45:24 PM
      Brinkman called the Antilles and Aruba "a largely corrupt gangsters' nest' and Jan van der Straten, then police chief of Bonaire, threatened to arrest him after the parlaimentary working trip got aborted after Brinkmans comments.

      The reason van der straten wanted to arresr brinkman was for the remarks about them being corrupt. On top of that Brinkman has said something along the lines of: Why havent we sold these islands on marktplaats.nl yet(Marktplaats=something like ebay). Straten said he would arrest him if he made that kind of comments while in Bonaire

      TY! It was said that years ago he worked for Paul Van Der Sloot and that is most likely where they became good friends. We know that Rudy Croes was very upset with wire tapping in June 2005 and we suspect that was between JANVDS and PVDS,We know just from Jorans book that they were probably in contact on a regular basis but I guess that is obvious.

      I wonder what Van Der Stratens next assignment will be? We heard last night from Jossy he is in Aruba but not involved in this case.

      I believe he will be PVDS personal bodyguard.   ::MonkeyHaHa::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: JE on March 03, 2008, 05:46:15 PM
      They showed the whine incident again on the Jensen show and if i were Paulus and my son threw a glass of wine in somebody's without the other person having said or done anything to justify such an act i would have slapped him so hard that he'd be looking like this  ::MonkeyConfused:: three days later. So i doubt they ll take him to talk to the cops anytime soon.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Dayhiker on March 03, 2008, 05:48:57 PM

      so Mos and Kruimel just have to sit their island adventure out. and never come back on the island afterwards.
      that's one reason why i find those contract periods so bad. colonial attitude.
      but there are not enough qualified arubans to do that job.
      or arubans who studied law rather work in the netherlands maybe.

      i doubt one is really committed i they have a safe exit strategy anyway.


      So far everybody that they have sent to Aruba is a dud, Caesu. None of them have done jack. I have no faith in Mos, hope he proves me wrong but he definitely got pimp slapped last two times he tried something down there. three strikes you're out.

      The losers list is getting longer: Karin Jannsen, Jan Van der Straten, Bob Wit, Ric Smid, Hans Less, Dop Kruimel, all have either hindered the case or gotten stomped on.

      What's odd is that the case is so simple and has been from the beginning.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Peaches on March 03, 2008, 05:49:10 PM
      They showed the whine incident again on the Jensen show and if i were Paulus and my son threw a glass of wine in somebody's without the other person having said or done anything to justify such an act i would have slapped him so hard that he'd be looking like this  ::MonkeyConfused:: three days later. So i doubt they ll take him to talk to the cops anytime soon.


      I agree.  He should have been backhanded right then and right there.

      Of course, it would probably be the first time he got what he had coming.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Observer on March 03, 2008, 05:51:19 PM

      According to Dave and Art Wood thats how he acted in June 2005. We know he showed up with Dennis Jacobs on his day off flashing his gun around,they took at as a obvious sign to back off from the Van Der Sloots.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Dayhiker on March 03, 2008, 05:51:42 PM
      They showed the whine incident again on the Jensen show and if i were Paulus and my son threw a glass of wine in somebody's without the other person having said or done anything to justify such an act i would have slapped him so hard that he'd be looking like this  ::MonkeyConfused:: three days later. So i doubt they ll take him to talk to the cops anytime soon.

       ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: I think Joran is the one that does the slapping in that family.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: caesu on March 03, 2008, 05:52:42 PM
      current affairs program NOVA is doing a series about The Antilles (and Aruba i suppose - some name them together)

      haven't watched it yet, but i will.

      http://www.novatv.nl/index.cfm?ln=nl&fuseaction=videoaudio.details&reportage_id=5853&CFID=38346573&CFTOKEN=55476033

      Quote
      SERIE: DE ANTILLEN, DEEL 1: DE DIENSTREIS

      Om de dag vertrekt er vanaf Schiphol een delegatie Haagse ambtenaren naar de Nederlandse Antillen: 180 keer per jaar. 
           
      De ambtenaren blijven daar gemiddeld een week. Ze geven er steun aan de ambtenaren ter plekke of nemen deel aan allerlei werkgroepen. Soms gaan ze alleen om zich aan de Antilliaanse collega' s voor te stellen.

      De Nederlandse delegaties komen van verschillende ministeries en de kans is groot dat ze elkaar onverwachts tegenkomen. De dienstreizen worden in Den Haag namelijk niet gecoördineerd. Dat blijkt uit onderzoek van NOVA.

      In de studio reageert staatssecretaris van Binnenlandse Zaken en Koninkrijksrelaties Ank Bijleveld.


      the first segment was about government/state delegations travelling every other day to the Antilles for al kinds of workgroups or support roles on the islands. or just to introduce themselves to their Antilles colleague.
      they stay on islands a week on average.

      these trips are not co-ordinated by The Hague. so it happend that those delegations unexpectedly bump into eachother.
      Ank Bijleveld, cabinet secretary for Kingdom affairs reacts in the studio.

      i don't know what the real issue is here but i suspect wasting money on easy holidays in the sun.
      but i go watch it this week and report back.

      maybe the other segments in this series will cover more interesting subjects.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Dayhiker on March 03, 2008, 05:54:50 PM

      The reason van der straten wanted to arresr brinkman was for the remarks about them being corrupt. On top of that Brinkman has said something along the lines of: Why havent we sold these islands on marktplaats.nl yet(Marktplaats=something like ebay). Straten said he would arrest him if he made that kind of comments while in Bonaire


      Interesting that Van der Straten wants to arrest somebody for free speech but protects a murderer.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: JE on March 03, 2008, 05:55:51 PM
      They showed the whine incident again on the Jensen show and if i were Paulus and my son threw a glass of wine in somebody's without the other person having said or done anything to justify such an act i would have slapped him so hard that he'd be looking like this  ::MonkeyConfused:: three days later. So i doubt they ll take him to talk to the cops anytime soon.

       ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: I think Joran is the one that does the slapping in that family.

      Probably LOL in his case it would be the other way round

      Before slap  ::MonkeyConfused:: after slap  ::MonkeyWink::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Observer on March 03, 2008, 05:56:27 PM

      TY! It was said that years ago he worked for Paul Van Der Sloot and that is most likely where they became good friends. We know that Rudy Croes was very upset with wire tapping in June 2005 and we suspect that was between JANVDS and PVDS,We know just from Jorans book that they were probably in contact on a regular basis but I guess that is obvious.

      I wonder what Van Der Stratens next assignment will be? We heard last night from Jossy he is in Aruba but not involved in this case.


      Any chance they drug Van der Straten's ass back to Holland to allow him to bail himself out of the cover-up? He's an obvious target.

      According to Jan himself he has political aspirations in the Antilles. I think Dompig's Shieldgroup is no longer in business as well so they both may be out of work. Dompig is currently in the running for a high level position with the ALE.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: GBMW on March 03, 2008, 06:01:19 PM

      Short summary:
      He was just on..nice interview. No real news / scoops; just a conversation about De Wereld Draait Door (not related to Natalee) - wine throwing incident - the Pauw & Witteman interview and that he has regular contact with Beth.

      Robert Jensen made the comment that after the confession nothing seemed to have happened. Peter said that before the case was closed, Joran wanted to claim money etc and now the investigation is open again; he is a murdersuspect & that they're working very hard on the case (and the way he said it made it look like he is in contact with people who are doing the investigation...but that's not really a surprise...) but results aren't there overnight.
      Peter also stated that after he went to Aruba to investigate, talk to people, see the surroundings were it all happened he was sure that Joran knew more...if you've got nothing to hide / are innocent you don't keep your mouth shut...

      They also talked about Jorans' parents...they claimed in the Pauw & Witteman interview they would have brought Joran to the police if they thought that he had something to do with it or knew more...Peter joked: Well they still have to go!



      Thanks GMBW and a belated welcome to the board. One thing that has been persistently missing in the Dutch media is the corruption angle in Aruba. It's so damn obvious. I wish they would jump on that more. I hope this is something Peter is working on behind the scenes.

      I think he's trying very hard to do so...he did it in his first special when the angle of  'the friend of the family' opening the door at the Van der Sloots house when the housesearch was going to happen was very important in the show...and with the cellphone - prison thing in his latest special.
      He has said  that he's got 'his own ideas' about Paul van der Sloot (and we all know what that means ;-)...). But he won't say it out loud if he doesn't have stuff to back it up. In his position credibility means just about everything & because of that he can't say things without proof. But he is aware of Paul van der Sloot & his buddies helping out Joran and ???; the rest of the media seem to have focused on Joran.

      Maybe it's also because the media can't really bring it up since it's mostly news / talkshows that bring the case. News: you need prove / Talkshow: not too much detail & difficulty concerning the subject...10 / 15 minutes max. for an item.
      Newspapers should have picked it up though; it's weird they haven't really done that.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: oceanexploration on March 03, 2008, 06:07:35 PM
      OE how long does it take to locate a given target with the rover-on average, assuming the boat is relatively close to it. How fast can it descend into the depths? And what about the density of the remaining targets, are they close, scattered, clustered, radom?

      The time it takes to dive and locate a target depends largely on sea conditions and water depth.  In water depth of 400 ft with moderate seas it was consistently taking 5 minutes to locate the target with the ROV based on the side scan data.  The coordinates I was giving the ROV pilot were consistently within a few feet of the actual target and often fell within the actual target.  This precision is only possible with perfect USBL (ultra-short baseline) acoustic navigation and very diligent working.  10 years ago this precision and resolution was not possible.  To answer your question it would take about a day, with daylight operations only, to dive on about 15-25 targets.  We would often "bounce dive" targets of little interest.  The dives are conducted in a combination of priority and distribution.  When targets are widely-spaced, location takes more control on operations.  When targets are close together, highest priority wins.  In any case, the top priority targets are done first regardless.   Basically, we had three levels of priority. 
      P1 targets were targets interpreted to likely be a fish trap.  P2 targets were interpreted to be possible containers or a possible fish trap, but less clear.  P3 targets were targets of little interest, but deemed worthy of inspection. 


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: caesu on March 03, 2008, 06:07:47 PM
      Maybe the Dutch media has their hands full over there without bothering with what's going on in Aruba?  Maybe they just don't care?  Is Aruba the black sheep of the family?

      I don't know.   

      true, together with St. Maarten another island.
      maye already posted but report came out today about heroïne/cocaïne smuggling via aruba.
      about the heroïne i was surprised actually. i thought that came from afghanistan and south-east-asia mainly.

      report from us state departement reported to congress friday 29th feb.:
      http://www.state.gov/p/inl/rls/nrcrpt/2008/vol1/html/100778.htm

      Quote
      Dutch Caribbean

      I. Summary

      Aruba, the Netherlands Antilles, and the Netherlands together form the Kingdom of the Netherlands. The two Caribbean parts of the Kingdom have autonomy over their internal affairs, with the right to exercise independent decision making in a number of counter narcotics areas. The Government of the Netherlands (GON) is responsible for the defense and foreign affairs of all three of the Kingdom and assists the Government of Aruba (GOA) and the Government of the Netherlands Antilles (GONA) in their efforts to combat narcotics trafficking. Negotiations are underway that are expected to result in the dissolution of the Netherlands Antilles in 2008, with Curacao and Sint Maarten to attain autonomous status similar to Aruba’s, while the islands of Bonaire and Saint Eustatius would become municipalities within the Kingdom of the Netherlands. Both Aruba and the Netherlands Antilles are active members of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) and Caribbean Financial Action Task Force (CFATF) and are subject to the 1988 UN Drug Convention as part of the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

      II. Status

      Netherlands Antilles. The islands of the Netherlands Antilles (NA) (Curacao and Bonaire off Venezuela and Saba, Saint Eustatius, and Sint Maarten east of the U.S. Virgin Islands) continue to serve as northbound transshipment points for cocaine and increasing amounts of heroin coming from South America; chiefly Colombia, Venezuela, and to a much lesser extent, Suriname. Go-fast boats are typically used to transport drugs to U.S. territory in the Caribbean, although the use of fishing boats, freighters, and cruise ships is becoming more common. Direct transport to Europe, and at times to the U.S., is sometimes carried-out by “mules” (drug couriers) using commercial flights. The DEA and local law enforcement saw continued go-fast boat traffic this year with some load sizes reduced because of a potential exposure to law enforcement. This shift was attributed to successful investigations along with investments by the Antilles in border security like the new ground-based radar system capable of identifying inbound vessels. These shipments were generally en route to Puerto Rico or the U.S. Virgin Islands, but Sint Maarten continued to hold some measurable popularity among couriers as a gateway to Europe. In addition to go-fast boat activity and smuggling via commercial airlines, large quantities of narcotics continued to be moved through in cargo containers.

      Sint Maarten’s geographic location and its multi-national population make it an ideal transshipment point between South America and the United States, for drugs and human smuggling. Dutch Sint Maarten is considered a “Free Zone”, which means there are limited controls placed on import and export of goods. This situation also applies to financial crimes. The absence of rigorous checks into monetary flows means that money laundering and proceeds from illegal activities are relatively easy to conceal. Sint Maarten announced draft legislation to be presented to Parliament in 2008 that would extend the requirement to report suspicious financial transactions to include not only banks and casinos but car dealers, jewelers, insurance companies, lawyers and accountants as well. In preparation for its expected autonomous status, Sint Maarten established a Crime Action Task Force to enhance law enforcement efforts against drug trafficking, human smuggling and money laundering.

      In Curacao, the crackdown at Curacao’s Hato International Airport on “mules”—who either ingest or conceal on their bodies illegal drugs — continued during 2007. Detentions of mules declined from a high of 80 to 100 per day, to approximately 10 per month in 2007, according to local court statistics. The decline can be directly attributed to aggressive law enforcement tactics employed by Antillean authorities, in conjunction with their Dutch partners, coupled with innovative legislative tactics like the confiscation of the passports of Antillean couriers.

      During 2007, the newly appointed Police Chief in conjunction with the Minister of Justice made a concentrated effort to improve Criminal Intelligence by creating a new Operational Intelligence Unit within the Curacao Police Corps. This specialized Intel Unit improved the investigative effectiveness of the police and successful joint Antillean/Dutch investigations conducted by the Hit and Run Money Laundering Team (HARM) have become commonplace during 2007.

      The specialized Dutch police units (RSTs) that support law enforcement in the NA continued to be effective in 2007. RST Curacao had its biggest success in a joint international money laundering operation named Operation Kings Cross, which focused on illegal activities within the Curacao Free Zone. This operation resulted in the seizure of $120,000 in Euros and $130,000 in U.S. Currency and the arrest of the principal target in the investigation. In another joint RST investigation named Operation Pick Pocket results included the seizure of 542 kilograms of cocaine, 10 kilograms of heroin, and the arrest of 61 individuals.

      The Netherlands Antilles and Aruba Coast Guard (CGNAA) was responsible for several seizures of cocaine, heroin, and marijuana during 2007. In October, the CGNAA, in coordination with the RST Curacao seized approximately 35 kilograms and a go-fast vessel. The CGNAA’s three cutters, outfitted with rigid-hull inflatable boats (RHIBs) and new ‘super’ RHIBs designed especially for counter narcotics work in the Caribbean, demonstrated their utility against go-fast boats and other targets.

      The CGNAA has developed an effective counternarcotics intelligence service and is considered by the U.S. Coast Guard and DEA to be an invaluable international law enforcement partner. Under the continued leadership of the Attorney General, the GONA continued to strengthen its cooperation with U.S. law enforcement authorities throughout 2007. This cooperation extended to Sint Maarten, where the United States and the GONA continued joint efforts against international organized crime and drug trafficking.

      The Dutch Navy also operates in the Netherlands Antilles under the auspices of Component Task Group 4.4 (CTG 4.4), which operates in international waters under the oversight of the Joint Inter Agency Task Force South (JIATF-S). Over the past two years, CTG 4.4 has become a close and essential ally of the DEA and other U.S. agencies. Their continual efforts to thwart drugs trafficking from the region have been noted at the highest levels of the DEA and U.S. government. Several notable seizures occurred during 2007. The most impressive effort was the tracking of a maritime vessel from Colombia, which culminated with the seizure of approximately 153 kilograms of heroin.

      The GONA demonstrated its commitment to the counternarcotics effort by continued support for a U.S. Forward Operating Location (FOL) at the Curacao Hato International Airport. Under a ten-year use agreement, signed in March 2000 and ratified in October 2001 by the Dutch Parliament, U.S. military aircraft conduct counternarcotics detection and monitoring flights over both the source and transit zones from commercial ramp space provided free of charge.

      Aruba. Aruba is a transshipment point for increasing quantities of heroin, and to a lesser extent cocaine that move north via cruise ships and the multiple daily flights to the U.S. and Europe. The island attracts drug traffickers because of its good infrastructure, excellent flight connections, and relatively light sentences for drug-related crimes served in prisons with relatively good living conditions.

      While Aruba enjoys a low crime rate, crime reporting during 2007 indicates that prominent drug traffickers are established on the island. Drug abuse in Aruba, including among tourists, remains a cause for concern. Cruise lines that visit Aruba have strict boarding/search policies for employees in order to thwart efforts of the traffickers to establish regular courier routes back to the United States. The expanding use of MDMA in clubs by young people attracts increasing attention. Private foundations on the island work on drug education and prevention and the Aruba government’s top counter narcotics official actively reaches out to U.S. sources for materials to use in prevention programs. The police also work in demand reduction programs among local schools and visit them regularly. The GOA has established an interagency commission to develop plans and programs to discourage youth from trafficking between the Netherlands and the U.S. The GOA has been very clear that it intends to pursue a dynamic counternarcotics strategy in close cooperation with its regional and international partners.

      In 2007, Aruba law enforcement officials continued to investigate and prosecute mid-level drug traffickers who supply drugs to “mules.” During 2007, there were several instances where Aruban authorities cooperated with U.S. authorities to carry out U.S. prosecutions of American citizens arrested in Aruba who were attempting to carry multi-kilogram quantities of drugs to the United States. Aruba also devotes substantial time and effort to the identification of the person’s responsible for the importation of drugs to Aruba.

      The GOA hosts the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) Bureau of Customs and Border Protection (CBP) pre-inspection and pre-clearance personnel at Reina Beatrix airport. These officers occupy facilities financed and built by the GOA. DHS seizures of cocaine and heroin were frequent in 2007. Aruba officials regularly explore ways to capitalize on the presence of the FOL and pre-clearance personnel, seeking to use resident U.S. law enforcement expertise to improve local law enforcement capabilities. In September, CBP’s Office of International Affairs and Trade Relations provided training on the implementation of border enforcement best practices and the proper use of inspection tool kits in the examination of aircraft, containers, vehicles and cargo.

      III. Actions Against Drugs in 2007

      Accomplishments. Available drug seizure statistics for calendar year 2007, as of October 31, 2007, were: Aruba seized 390 kilograms of cocaine and 13 kilograms of heroin. The Netherlands Antilles seized 638 kilograms of cocaine and 10 kilograms of heroin.

      Corruption. As a matter of policy, the NA does not encourage or facilitate the illicit production or distribution of narcotic or psychotropic drugs or other controlled substances, or the laundering of proceeds from illegal drug transactions. During 2007, the NA continued an aggressive and successful program to identify certain links from prominent traffickers in the region to law enforcement officials, which prompted additional investigation in the region. The NA has been quick to address these issues through criminal investigations, internal investigations, new hiring practices, and continued monitoring of law enforcement officials that hold sensitive positions. Aruba’s judiciary enjoys a well-deserved reputation for integrity. It has close ties with the Dutch legal system, including extensive seconding of Dutch prosecutors and judges to fill positions for which there are no qualified candidates among the small Antillean and Aruban populations.

      Agreements and Treaties. The Netherlands extended the 1988 UN Drug Convention to the NA and Aruba in March 1999, with the reservation that its obligations under certain provisions would only be applicable in so far as they were in accordance with NA and Aruba criminal legislation and policy on criminal matters. The NA and Aruba subsequently enacted revised, uniform legislation to resolve a lack of uniformity between the asset forfeiture laws of the NA and Aruba. The obligations of the Netherlands as a party to the 1961 UN Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, as amended by the 1972 Protocol, the Inter-American Convention against Corruption, and the UN Convention against Transnational Organized Crime and its three protocols apply to the NA and Aruba. The obligations of the Netherlands under the 1971 UN Convention on Psychotropic Substances have applied to the NA since March 10, 1999. The Netherlands’s Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty (MLAT) with the United States applies to the NA and Aruba. Both Aruba and the NA routinely honor requests made under the MLAT and cooperate extensively with the United States on law enforcement matters at less formal levels.

      Cultivation/Production. Cultivation and production of illicit drugs are not issues.

      Domestic Programs (Demand Reduction). Both the NA and Aruba have ongoing demand reduction programs, but need additional resources. In 2007, the Curacao Police Corps, in conjunction with Drug Abuse Resistance Education program (D.A.R.E.), opened a new D.A.R.E. facility in Willemstad, Curacao to aid in youth Demand Reduction activities.

      IV. U.S. Policy Initiatives and Programs

      The United States encourages Aruba and NA law enforcement officials to participate in INL-funded regional training courses provided by U.S. agencies at the GOA and GONA’s expense. Chiefly through the DEA and DHS/Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the United States is able to provide assistance to enhance technical capabilities as well as some targeted training. The U.S. continues to search for ways in which locally assigned U.S. law enforcement personnel can share their expertise with host country counterparts.

      Appreciation of the importance of intelligence to effective law enforcement has grown in the Dutch Caribbean. The USG is expanding intelligence sharing with GOA and GONA officials as they realize the mutual benefits that result from such sharing. As U.S.-provided intelligence must meet the strict requirements of local law, sharing of intelligence and law enforcement information requires ongoing, extensive liaison work to bridge the difference between U.S. and Dutch-based law.

      Road Ahead. Drug trafficking and related money laundering and criminal violence continue to threaten the Dutch Caribbean. The expansion of law enforcement cooperation between the U.S., Dutch, and Aruba and Netherlands Antilles will serve to protect the Dutch Caribbean from these threats and contribute to broader counternarcotics efforts in the Caribbean as well.


      reported in dutch media:
      http://www.nu.nl/news/1461794/20/%27Aruba_doorvoerhaven_van_hero%EFne%27.html


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: SunnyinTX on March 03, 2008, 06:08:06 PM
      Peter R de Vries on Robert Jensen Show

      -talking about the book-incident on DWDD, they show the clip
      -tomorrow Beth will be on, pre-recorded, Beth told Robert that she's very grateful to Peter
      -behind the scenes a lot going on, investigation re-opened
      -Joran still murder-suspect
      -cannot be solved within one week, takes time
      -Robert could tell that when Joran was on his show, that he was holding back, 99% of the audience felt that too, not that he was lying but he was holding back information, he knew more than he was letting on
      -Peter's investigation in 2006, was clear to Peter then that Joran was involved, it's strange that Joran wanted to remain silent, if you're innocent all you want to do is tell the truth, not remain silent. Joran couldn't answer the simplest questions
      -Peter asked questions on P&W-show (wine incident) Joran couldn't or wouldn't answer
      -Peter's wife said to Anita on P&W-show, while she was helping Peter getting wine out of his eyes: "You educated your son well" in a very sarcastic way
      -Peter still talks to Beth on a regular basis

      Jo-An thans so very much!! ::MonkeyDance::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: texasmom on March 03, 2008, 06:09:03 PM

      Wanted to shout out to our Dutch Monkeys and tell you how much I enjoy reading your posts and appreciate your updates from the media in Holland. Wish we'd had you here from the start and didn't have to get our information from the Dutch trolls who were in the Van der Sloot camp. Welcome!
       

       ::MonkeyWink:: ::MonkeyWink:: ::MonkeyWink::


      I'll add an AMEN to that!

      ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: WELCOME DUTCH MONKEYS!!!! WE'RE GLAD YOU'RE HERE WITH US, STANDING WITH THE GIRL!!!  ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: private eye on March 03, 2008, 06:10:33 PM
      Jo-ann I think you posted about friends of jurin's currently posting that his 2 younger brothers where in Netherlands with avds.  THANK YOU FOR THAT INFO!!!!!!  Many of us here were given that same info in June 2005 by people in aruba and not friends of the people of the ditch (love that name!).  Also a Monkey found out that 3 people of the ditch (3 van der sloots) flew from nl to aruba the day avds said she came home around June 1.  IMO, pvds needed his younger sons home for an alibi and that is when that story change.  Thanks again for posting that info.

      Here are the posts from Fok.

      Beth Holloway in Jensen tomorrow? I'll have a look.

      Quote
      kinkajoe
      donderdag 28 februari 2008 @ 18:12 (#27)   
               
      Op zaterdag 23 februari 2008 15:56 schreef mrBhimself het volgende:
      En overigens Anita van der Sloot was helemaal niet in Amerika, maar was samen met haar jongste twee kinderen in Nederland op bezoek bij haar moeder. Je bent wederom eens slecht geinformeerd!

      Volgens deze poster was Mw. v.d. Sloot met twee kinderen in Nederland.

       mrBhimself
      donderdag 28 februari 2008 @ 18:56 (#28)   
                       
      Inderdaad
      Don't follow leaders, watch the parking meters

      Mr B says: "and by the way, Anita van der Sloot was not at all in America, but with her youngest two children in Holland to visit her mother. You are again very bad informed"

      Kinkajoe quotes this sentence in a thread about the brothers and says: "according to this poster Mrs. v.d. Sloot was with two children in Holland".

      Mr B came to the thread about the brothers to say: "Indeed, don't follow leaders, watch the parking meters".

      Very interesting and that is what many believe that Anita was not in Holland alone. Kind of ridiculous to think she would leave a 10 year old home alone with Joran,especially after the things he does to the middle sibling. I suspect that it wasnt just Joran who was at play while Anita was away!

      So why did Paulus lie under oath?


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Tamikosmom on March 03, 2008, 06:11:06 PM
      Any estimations as to the dimensions and weight of the cage, or based upon the general conditions of the cage, coral build up, rust, etc. how long the cage had been submersed? It looked awfully large, but water can distort sizes to a certain extent. It looked a lot larger than the cages that would have been at the fishermans hut.

      The trap was symmetrical in width and length at approximately 7.5 ft. It was approximately 2.25-2.5 ft high.  You're correct about the ROV video lens distorting perspective due to the paralax view lens. 

      Thank you Kyle.

      The size of the trap/cage did appear so much larger in the image on Dateline.  The divers appeared very small in comparison.

      Janet

      +++++++++

      Dr. Hodges:

      The fisherman described the cage as made of 3/8-inch iron (such as that used in concrete reinforcing—"rebar") with a frame size approximately 5 ½ feet by 4 feet by 17 inches. He described it as a large fishing cage with its frame wrapped in chicken wire with its familiar hexagonal openings but with an opening in one panel which allowed them to trap fish. He believed that, given its size and weight, it would take two men to manage the cage. Once aboard, it would lay low on the floor of the nearby fishing boat.

      http://forensicthoughtprints.com/aruba/default.html

      Part 4 of the following YouTube download of the Dateline program pertains to the dive.  Although shared today that the trap/cage is larger than the cage/trap that was apparently stolen from the Fisherman's Hut ... the underwater image is very deceiving ... the size appears enormous.

      Janet

      +++++++++++++
       
      DATELINE - FEBRUARY 22, 2008

      http://youtube.com/watch?v=qPcVNZOp4tI&feature=related
      Part 1

      http://youtube.com/watch?v=D-uzUb1SxKA&feature=related
      Part 2

      http://youtube.com/watch?v=WkQ10zKh4S0&feature=related
      Part 3

      http://youtube.com/watch?v=z5B0t2cyGzs&feature=related
      Part 4



      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: private eye on March 03, 2008, 06:13:45 PM

      According to Dave and Art Wood thats how he acted in June 2005. We know he showed up with Dennis Jacobs on his day off flashing his gun around,they took at as a obvious sign to back off from the Van Der Sloots.

      Maybe Paulus is the big drug dealer and he hides behind his son Lorenzo


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: GBMW on March 03, 2008, 06:14:28 PM
      Beth will be on Jensen show tomorrow but..... tonite Peter R de Vries will be on!!!
      Starts in 10 mins!!!!!!  ::MonkeyDance::
      Will keep you updated.

      Jo-An  - Thanks!  I heard Beth will also be on Paul & Wittman (sp) tomorrow.

      Do you happen to know if she will be the only guest? Uhmm...well that hasn't happened yet on that show so probably that's just wishfull thinking...perhaps with Peter R. de Vries & Patrick van der Eem (or is he still in Aruba)? Then they will really have some time to talk about the case / the corruption.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Anna on March 03, 2008, 06:14:43 PM
      I haven't read all the way back yet but has this been posted:

      http://www.nu.nl/news/1461794/20/'Aruba_doorvoerhaven_van_hero%efne'.html

      Little bit translated:

       Aruba transit port of heroin '
      ORANJESTAD - Aruba is a transit port for heroin and to a lesser degree of cocaine. Drug use on the island, also under tourists, remains a point of care. That stands in a report which The international Narcotics Strategy Friday to the American congress in America to report (INSCR) have offered. The report over the year 2007 has been made Monday public.
       
      Cruising ships
      The drugs would further be transported as from the island by means of cruising ships which put on Aruba and the daily flights as from the island to America and Europe. According to the report Aruba is interesting for smugglers by the ' good infrastructure, excellent flight connections and relatively light punish for drug trafficking in relatively good circumstances '. The report communicates that Aruba has crime indeed little, but that becomes clear that from crime research in 2007, ' prominent on the island has established drug traffickers '.
      ------------


      Sounds like business as usual in Aruba.



      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: SunnyinTX on March 03, 2008, 06:15:36 PM
      They showed the whine incident again on the Jensen show and if i were Paulus and my son threw a glass of wine in somebody's without the other person having said or done anything to justify such an act i would have slapped him so hard that he'd be looking like this  ::MonkeyConfused:: three days later. So i doubt they ll take him to talk to the cops anytime soon.


      I agree.  He should have been backhanded right then and right there.

      Of course, it would probably be the first time he got what he had coming.

      JE and Peaches...AMEN...my son would still be reeling!!


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Ono on March 03, 2008, 06:17:12 PM
      Can you just imagine the shock?....you send pictures
      to the FBI and the next thing you know the pictures
      are on the internet.


      So foolish and so careless.   Stunning.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: caesu on March 03, 2008, 06:17:15 PM

      so Mos and Kruimel just have to sit their island adventure out. and never come back on the island afterwards.
      that's one reason why i find those contract periods so bad. colonial attitude.
      but there are not enough qualified arubans to do that job.
      or arubans who studied law rather work in the netherlands maybe.

      i doubt one is really committed i they have a safe exit strategy anyway.


      So far everybody that they have sent to Aruba is a dud, Caesu. None of them have done jack. I have no faith in Mos, hope he proves me wrong but he definitely got pimp slapped last two times he tried something down there. three strikes you're out.

      The losers list is getting longer: Karin Jannsen, Jan Van der Straten, Bob Wit, Ric Smid, Hans Less, Dop Kruimel, all have either hindered the case or gotten stomped on.

      What's odd is that the case is so simple and has been from the beginning.


      i did have high hopes in nico jörg, the procureur general. that's is something like the one person down from rudy croes.
      i read some good articles about him.
      but he is the care taker procureur general since fernandez-croes announce stepping down by january 2008 but already went on leave juli 2007.
      so i think very soon rudy croes will replace nico jörg with one of his cronies.
      which is a shame because nico jörg seems to be a good one. but he got frustrated by rudy croes, that's what i read between the lines.
      maybe he will speak out after he get replaced...


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: caesu on March 03, 2008, 06:20:18 PM
      I haven't read all the way back yet but has this been posted:

      http://www.nu.nl/news/1461794/20/'Aruba_doorvoerhaven_van_hero%efne'.html

      Little bit translated:

       Aruba transit port of heroin '
      ORANJESTAD - Aruba is a transit port for heroin and to a lesser degree of cocaine. Drug use on the island, also under tourists, remains a point of care. That stands in a report which The international Narcotics Strategy Friday to the American congress in America to report (INSCR) have offered. The report over the year 2007 has been made Monday public.
       
      Cruising ships
      The drugs would further be transported as from the island by means of cruising ships which put on Aruba and the daily flights as from the island to America and Europe. According to the report Aruba is interesting for smugglers by the ' good infrastructure, excellent flight connections and relatively light punish for drug trafficking in relatively good circumstances '. The report communicates that Aruba has crime indeed little, but that becomes clear that from crime research in 2007, ' prominent on the island has established drug traffickers '.
      ------------


      Sounds like business as usual in Aruba.



      yes that's the report a posted a page back.
      report from united states department of state to the congress.
      quite good reading imo.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: JE on March 03, 2008, 06:22:57 PM

      Short summary:
      He was just on..nice interview. No real news / scoops; just a conversation about De Wereld Draait Door (not related to Natalee) - wine throwing incident - the Pauw & Witteman interview and that he has regular contact with Beth.

      Robert Jensen made the comment that after the confession nothing seemed to have happened. Peter said that before the case was closed, Joran wanted to claim money etc and now the investigation is open again; he is a murdersuspect & that they're working very hard on the case (and the way he said it made it look like he is in contact with people who are doing the investigation...but that's not really a surprise...) but results aren't there overnight.
      Peter also stated that after he went to Aruba to investigate, talk to people, see the surroundings were it all happened he was sure that Joran knew more...if you've got nothing to hide / are innocent you don't keep your mouth shut...

      They also talked about Jorans' parents...they claimed in the Pauw & Witteman interview they would have brought Joran to the police if they thought that he had something to do with it or knew more...Peter joked: Well they still have to go!



      Thanks GMBW and a belated welcome to the board. One thing that has been persistently missing in the Dutch media is the corruption angle in Aruba. It's so damn obvious. I wish they would jump on that more. I hope this is something Peter is working on behind the scenes.

      I think the problem with "western" democracies is that the powers that rule want everyone to believe that corruption is a problem of third world countries. It only happens in the "bananna republics " of this planet. In our civilized societies, Europe, the US etc there is no such thing. WRONG it happens everywhere at all levels. Most people in power have a personal agenda. Be it money, a need for power, status, whatever. We just seem to have a notion that it is better, so that no one is embarrassed, to promote people that are under suspicion of corruption away to another job or position. I firmly believe that the corruption angle is visible to the guy on the street but he or she simply does not have the means to do anything about it. The people in power if pressured enough will switch a few pawns around until the general public seems to be pleased with the solution they came up with, and then it's bussiness as usual.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Peaches on March 03, 2008, 06:23:29 PM
      Caesu, that was fascinating.  Thank you.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: bluwaters on March 03, 2008, 06:25:06 PM
      Allow me to reiterate in case you missed my previous posting about our leaving and the pics at BFN:

      John sent the pics to his sister who is an active poster at BFN.  I had nothing to due with it, I was traveling.  It wasn't intended to snub anyone, nor was there any harm intended by anyone.  I am not involved in the fund raising, nor do I wish to be. 
      The views posted by anyone other than the search team does not reflect the views or opinions of the search team.  I've done my best to keep the blog updated and reflective of our views.  Recently, (past several weeks) my plate was overflowing and the blog suffered as a result in terms of content.  However, it is still carefully constructed and every word is in it's proper purposeful context. 
      I will continue to keep it updated with news and updates as they unfold and as things develop. 



      These few words speak * volumes * to me...OE is one crafty Monkey...I respect that...

      I agree, Destiny.
      Spot on. I don't believe for a minute that OE is naive about the internet either. At 25, he most likely cut his teeth on it. My teenagers were toddlers when I first got a PC and discovered the net. They are now the official techies in the household. DH and I call on them frequently to fix computer glitches. The young are incredibly sophisticated about computers and the internet, especially those of a scientific nature.

      I really appreciate OE's explanation of how the photos got posted. Who would have guessed that the FBI released them?(http://i92.photobucket.com/albums/l28/TallyAnna/smilies/sekret.gif)




      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: blah on March 03, 2008, 06:25:14 PM
      OE how long does it take to locate a given target with the rover-on average, assuming the boat is relatively close to it. How fast can it descend into the depths? And what about the density of the remaining targets, are they close, scattered, clustered, radom?

      The time it takes to dive and locate a target depends largely on sea conditions and water depth.  In water depth of 400 ft with moderate seas it was consistently taking 5 minutes to locate the target with the ROV based on the side scan data.  The coordinates I was giving the ROV pilot were consistently within a few feet of the actual target and often fell within the actual target.  This precision is only possible with perfect USBL (ultra-short baseline) acoustic navigation and very diligent working.  10 years ago this precision and resolution was not possible.  To answer your question it would take about a day, with daylight operations only, to dive on about 15-25 targets.  We would often "bounce dive" targets of little interest.  The dives are conducted in a combination of priority and distribution.  When targets are widely-spaced, location takes more control on operations.  When targets are close together, highest priority wins.  In any case, the top priority targets are done first regardless.   Basically, we had three levels of priority. 
      P1 targets were targets interpreted to likely be a fish trap.  P2 targets were interpreted to be possible containers or a possible fish trap, but less clear.  P3 targets were targets of little interest, but deemed worthy of inspection. 

      can you tell us how many P1 targets you guys have identified and not yet checked out?  Same with P2?
      What do you feel the odds are that you folks will get the chance to go back and check them out?


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Observer on March 03, 2008, 06:26:15 PM
      Jo-ann I think you posted about friends of jurin's currently posting that his 2 younger brothers where in Netherlands with avds.  THANK YOU FOR THAT INFO!!!!!!  Many of us here were given that same info in June 2005 by people in aruba and not friends of the people of the ditch (love that name!).  Also a Monkey found out that 3 people of the ditch (3 van der sloots) flew from nl to aruba the day avds said she came home around June 1.  IMO, pvds needed his younger sons home for an alibi and that is when that story change.  Thanks again for posting that info.

      Here are the posts from Fok.

      Beth Holloway in Jensen tomorrow? I'll have a look.

      Quote
      kinkajoe
      donderdag 28 februari 2008 @ 18:12 (#27)   
               
      Op zaterdag 23 februari 2008 15:56 schreef mrBhimself het volgende:
      En overigens Anita van der Sloot was helemaal niet in Amerika, maar was samen met haar jongste twee kinderen in Nederland op bezoek bij haar moeder. Je bent wederom eens slecht geinformeerd!

      Volgens deze poster was Mw. v.d. Sloot met twee kinderen in Nederland.

       mrBhimself
      donderdag 28 februari 2008 @ 18:56 (#28)   
                       
      Inderdaad
      Don't follow leaders, watch the parking meters

      Mr B says: "and by the way, Anita van der Sloot was not at all in America, but with her youngest two children in Holland to visit her mother. You are again very bad informed"

      Kinkajoe quotes this sentence in a thread about the brothers and says: "according to this poster Mrs. v.d. Sloot was with two children in Holland".

      Mr B came to the thread about the brothers to say: "Indeed, don't follow leaders, watch the parking meters".

      Very interesting and that is what many believe that Anita was not in Holland alone. Kind of ridiculous to think she would leave a 10 year old home alone with Joran,especially after the things he does to the middle sibling. I suspect that it wasnt just Joran who was at play while Anita was away!

      So why did Paulus lie under oath?
      Well that lie was for himself as Deepak would say. No reason to lie about meeting Natalee and sitting next to her at the Black Jack table unless he had something to hide. I would suspect that is where the Premediated suspicions on his arrest were about,clearly he was trying to distance himself. If it is true the two younger brothers were in Holland that would be remarkeable that they were allowed to lie to the world about him and Joran being home alone.

      Out of all the Interviews PVDS has done why hasn't anyone questioned him about the Supreme Courts ruling why he was denied his money? I think everyone would like to hear why he is on wiretaps,witnesses and from his own mouth that he picked up Natalee at 4AM and had two contacts with her.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: hotping on March 03, 2008, 06:33:03 PM
      Hi Kyle....Have You talked to Anyone on the Persistence today? I'm just wondering how Their trip is going so far and Praying that They get back to Louisiana safely....TIA


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: GBMW on March 03, 2008, 06:33:03 PM
      Jo-ann I think you posted about friends of jurin's currently posting that his 2 younger brothers where in Netherlands with avds.  THANK YOU FOR THAT INFO!!!!!!  Many of us here were given that same info in June 2005 by people in aruba and not friends of the people of the ditch (love that name!).  Also a Monkey found out that 3 people of the ditch (3 van der sloots) flew from nl to aruba the day avds said she came home around June 1.  IMO, pvds needed his younger sons home for an alibi and that is when that story change.  Thanks again for posting that info.

      Here are the posts from Fok.

      Beth Holloway in Jensen tomorrow? I'll have a look.

      Quote
      kinkajoe
      donderdag 28 februari 2008 @ 18:12 (#27)   
               
      Op zaterdag 23 februari 2008 15:56 schreef mrBhimself het volgende:
      En overigens Anita van der Sloot was helemaal niet in Amerika, maar was samen met haar jongste twee kinderen in Nederland op bezoek bij haar moeder. Je bent wederom eens slecht geinformeerd!

      Volgens deze poster was Mw. v.d. Sloot met twee kinderen in Nederland.

       mrBhimself
      donderdag 28 februari 2008 @ 18:56 (#28)   
                       
      Inderdaad
      Don't follow leaders, watch the parking meters

      Mr B says: "and by the way, Anita van der Sloot was not at all in America, but with her youngest two children in Holland to visit her mother. You are again very bad informed"

      Kinkajoe quotes this sentence in a thread about the brothers and says: "according to this poster Mrs. v.d. Sloot was with two children in Holland".

      Mr B came to the thread about the brothers to say: "Indeed, don't follow leaders, watch the parking meters".

      Very interesting and that is what many believe that Anita was not in Holland alone. Kind of ridiculous to think she would leave a 10 year old home alone with Joran,especially after the things he does to the middle sibling. I suspect that it wasnt just Joran who was at play while Anita was away!

      So why did Paulus lie under oath?

      Uhmmm I don't know about this...a friend of someone I know was living in Aruba at the time (and knows Joran & his family...they're not in contact anymore...no wonder why). She told the person I know only his mother was in the Netherlands at the time.
      All three of them had school etc. so it would make sense for them not to go along on this trip......and if they weren't home....who was online as 'Valentijn' - hotmail that night?


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: oldfart on March 03, 2008, 06:35:52 PM
      I have to run out for the evening.  I'm not commenting more at this time about the trap or it's contents. 

      1. Why not? You must be aware there is more speculation than facts in these forums.

      2. If you refuse to comment on the contents we will have to assume, remains were found and your response is a legalistic "no comment"

      Oh come on Gang... give OE   a break... He has a job to do with certain rules in place!

      Why keep asking him to break the rules?   Hell I bet he wants to talk about it but has enough integertiy NOT to.
      JMO of course


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Kermit on March 03, 2008, 06:36:42 PM
      (http://img136.imageshack.us/img136/1057/skullnocolorur2.jpg)

      Same object that appears to be a skull with color removed and flipped the pic around



      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: caesu on March 03, 2008, 06:36:46 PM

      Short summary:
      He was just on..nice interview. No real news / scoops; just a conversation about De Wereld Draait Door (not related to Natalee) - wine throwing incident - the Pauw & Witteman interview and that he has regular contact with Beth.

      Robert Jensen made the comment that after the confession nothing seemed to have happened. Peter said that before the case was closed, Joran wanted to claim money etc and now the investigation is open again; he is a murdersuspect & that they're working very hard on the case (and the way he said it made it look like he is in contact with people who are doing the investigation...but that's not really a surprise...) but results aren't there overnight.
      Peter also stated that after he went to Aruba to investigate, talk to people, see the surroundings were it all happened he was sure that Joran knew more...if you've got nothing to hide / are innocent you don't keep your mouth shut...

      They also talked about Jorans' parents...they claimed in the Pauw & Witteman interview they would have brought Joran to the police if they thought that he had something to do with it or knew more...Peter joked: Well they still have to go!



      Thanks GMBW and a belated welcome to the board. One thing that has been persistently missing in the Dutch media is the corruption angle in Aruba. It's so damn obvious. I wish they would jump on that more. I hope this is something Peter is working on behind the scenes.

      I think the problem with "western" democracies is that the powers that rule want everyone to believe that corruption is a problem of third world countries. It only happens in the "bananna republics " of this planet. In our civilized societies, Europe, the US etc there is no such thing. WRONG it happens everywhere at all levels. Most people in power have a personal agenda. Be it money, a need for power, status, whatever. We just seem to have a notion that it is better, so that no one is embarrassed, to promote people that are under suspicion of corruption away to another job or position. I firmly believe that the corruption angle is visible to the guy on the street but he or she simply does not have the means to do anything about it. The people in power if pressured enough will switch a few pawns around until the general public seems to be pleased with the solution they came up with, and then it's bussiness as usual.


      http://www.transparency.org/policy_research/surveys_indices/cpi/2007

      and then on the corruption preception index aruba is put together with the netherlands and all is fine.
      but all countries surrounding aruba are bright red.

      and i think the justice system on aruba is very different from the netherlands for quite a few reasons so they shouldn't put it together with the netherlands. there's a different book of law and a independent OM.
      they share the same queen and the same supreme court, but the supreme court reverts back to lower court, doesn't handle cases themselves.
      and also the colonial contract judges and prosecutors make things different.
      they don't send aruba judges of prosecutors to the netherlands for 3 years or do they?


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Kermit on March 03, 2008, 06:38:03 PM
      ribbit kyle

      great work

      I enjoy your posts etc.



      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Kermit on March 03, 2008, 06:41:11 PM
      The justices on the Aruban bench:

      mw. mr. E. Angela august 1st 2000
      mw. mr. P. de Bruin august 1st 2000
      mr. J.S. Kuiperdal
      mr. P.A.H. Lemaire august 1st 2002
      mr. C. Slothouber august 1st 2001
      ## mr. F.J.F. Gerard march 1st 2005
      ## mr. H.E. de Boer august 1st 2005
      ## mr. J.A. van Voorthuizen august 1st 2005



      The justices on the Curacao bench

      mw. mr. M.K. Asscheman-Versluis (since august 1st 1999)
      mr. J. de Boer august 1st 1998
      @ mr. R.A. Th. M. Dekkers after 2004 because at that time he was judge in The Hague
      mr. W. Foppen (since august 1st 1999)
      mr. L. van Gijn august 1st 2000
      @ mr. L. Groefsema after 2004 because mr. L. Groefsema was a judge in Assen in 2004
      @ mw. mr. L.C. Hoefdraad after 2004 because mw. mr. L.C. Hoefdraad at that time was a judge in the Hague
      @ mr. S.M. Lieshout after 2004 because mr. S.M. Lieshout was a judge in Utrecht
      mr. B.M. Mezas

      @ mr. R.F.B. van Zutphen after 2004 because mr. R.F.B. van Zutphen was a judge in Amsterdam
      mr. M.W. Zandbergen since may 1st 2000
      @ mr. J.Th. Wit after 2004 because in 2004 he was DA in Dordrecht
      mr. P. Wagemakers august 1st 2000
      @ mr. R.W.J. van Veen after 2004 because in 2004 he was still a judge in Breda
      mw. mr. M.M.M. Tillema september 1st 2000
      @ mr. J.R. Sijmonsma after 2004
      mw. mr. E.A. Saleh since august 1st 1999
      mr. G.E.M. Polkamp november 1st 2000
      @ mw. mr. M.H.H.A. Moes 2004 or later because in 2004 she was a judge in Almelo
      mr. M.L.A. Angela since march 1st 2000
      mr. A.N.G.N.E. Mijnssen since 1996, from november 2000 onwards part-time judge
      mr. F.P. Wiel re-appointed for 3 more years on august 1st 1999
      @ mr. H.A.C. Smid (since march 1st 2005)
      ## mr. J.M.P. Drijkoningen (since august 1st 2005)
      ## mw. mr. A.M.P. Geelhoed (since august 1st 2005)
      ## mr. K.J. Haarhuis (since august 1st 2005)
      ## mw. mr. L. de Kerpel-van de Poel (since august 1st 2005)
      ## mw. mr. A.S. Gratama (since august 1st 2005)
      ## mr. H.L. Wattel (since september 1st 2005)
      Mr. P. W. van Schendel re-appointed for 3 more years on august 1st 2005

      ## mr. E.M. van der Bunt february 1st 2005
      ## mr. dr. J.P. de Haan february 1st 2005
      @ mr. J.H. Bosch august 1st 2004
      @ mr. E.P. van Unen august 1st 2004
      @ mr. drs. G.C.C. Lewin august 1st 2004
      @ mr W.J. Noordhuizen august 1st 2004
      @ mr J.Th. Drop september 1st 2004

      From the 45 justices working for the Court of Aruba and the Antilles:

      11 started working there after Paul van der Sloot became a suspect
      15 started working there much later than Paul van der Sloot

      Only 19 might be friends of Paul van der Sloot and of them 14 were Curacao justices.








      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Observer on March 03, 2008, 06:44:28 PM
      Jo-ann I think you posted about friends of jurin's currently posting that his 2

      Here are the posts from Fok.

      Beth Holloway in Jensen tomorrow? I'll have a look.

      Quote
      kinkajoe
      donderdag 28 februari 2008 @ 18:12 (#27)   
               
      Op zaterdag 23 februari 2008 15:56 schreef mrBhimself het volgende:
      En overigens Anita van der Sloot was helemaal niet in Amerika, maar was samen met haar jongste twee kinderen in Nederland op bezoek bij haar moeder. Je bent wederom eens slecht geinformeerd!

      Volgens deze poster was Mw. v.d. Sloot met twee kinderen in Nederland.

       mrBhimself
      donderdag 28 februari 2008 @ 18:56 (#28)   
                       
      Inderdaad
      Don't follow leaders, watch the parking meters

      Mr B says: "and by the way, Anita van der Sloot was not at all in America, but with her youngest two children in Holland to visit her mother. You are again very bad informed"

      Kinkajoe quotes this sentence in a thread about the brothers and says: "according to this poster Mrs. v.d. Sloot was with two children in Holland".

      Mr B came to the thread about the brothers to say: "Indeed, don't follow leaders, watch the parking meters".

      Very interesting and that is what many believe that Anita was not in Holland alone. Kind of ridiculous to think she would leave a 10 year old home alone with Joran,especially after the things he does to the middle sibling. I suspect that it wasnt just Joran who was at play while Anita was away!

      So why did Paulus lie under oath?

      Uhmmm I don't know about this...a friend of someone I know was living in Aruba at the time (and knows Joran & his family...they're not in contact anymore...no wonder why). She told the person I know only his mother was in the Netherlands at the time.
      All three of them had school etc. so it would make sense for them not to go along on this trip......and if they weren't home....who was online as 'Valentijn' - hotmail that night?
      I don't know either but who was watching the 10 year old if PVDS just arrived home on the 29th? Maybe Joran had some friends over that night? Possibly Freddy A? Maybe VAl was home but the youngest was in Holland? Also why was Val up till almost 3AM on a school night? Try to put yourself in PVDS shoes if  it is true he just found out he failed his tests to be a full fledged Judge in the Antilles. It appears to many people that is him drinking and gambling on video 2 hours after he said he left to go home. If you read all the PV'S it is quite clear that Joran did not take his place in a poker tournament and place 4th winning money. Which sets up the next day when PVDS had to make these bank transaction with the deceased Bank Employee who died just a few weeks later.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Spock on March 03, 2008, 06:45:42 PM
      No comment on the contents of the cage is still odd, after describing in detail the gae size and dimensions. The quick "thumbs down" signal from the dive team tells me it was nothing. Likely OE has signed a privacy and intelluctual rights agreement. All photos and information property of the company. I would expect a book deal, with detailed photos and a daily log outlining the search. This will allow a portion of the search expenses to be recovered.

      Yes, we owe the search team our gratitute, However, if they wont comment, there is nothing preventing them from explaning why no comment. Thats a reasonable expectation.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Blue Moon on March 03, 2008, 06:46:17 PM
      (http://img136.imageshack.us/img136/1057/skullnocolorur2.jpg)

      Same object that appears to be a skull with color removed and flipped the pic around



      Kermit, I am one who believes that is a skull.  You are creeping me out with those enhancements.  I see eyes and mouth.  It is spooky. ::MonkeyEek::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: JE on March 03, 2008, 06:46:22 PM

      Short summary:
      He was just on..nice interview. No real news / scoops; just a conversation about De Wereld Draait Door (not related to Natalee) - wine throwing incident - the Pauw & Witteman interview and that he has regular contact with Beth.

      Robert Jensen made the comment that after the confession nothing seemed to have happened. Peter said that before the case was closed, Joran wanted to claim money etc and now the investigation is open again; he is a murdersuspect & that they're working very hard on the case (and the way he said it made it look like he is in contact with people who are doing the investigation...but that's not really a surprise...) but results aren't there overnight.
      Peter also stated that after he went to Aruba to investigate, talk to people, see the surroundings were it all happened he was sure that Joran knew more...if you've got nothing to hide / are innocent you don't keep your mouth shut...

      They also talked about Jorans' parents...they claimed in the Pauw & Witteman interview they would have brought Joran to the police if they thought that he had something to do with it or knew more...Peter joked: Well they still have to go!



      Thanks GMBW and a belated welcome to the board. One thing that has been persistently missing in the Dutch media is the corruption angle in Aruba. It's so damn obvious. I wish they would jump on that more. I hope this is something Peter is working on behind the scenes.

      I think the problem with "western" democracies is that the powers that rule want everyone to believe that corruption is a problem of third world countries. It only happens in the "bananna republics " of this planet. In our civilized societies, Europe, the US etc there is no such thing. WRONG it happens everywhere at all levels. Most people in power have a personal agenda. Be it money, a need for power, status, whatever. We just seem to have a notion that it is better, so that no one is embarrassed, to promote people that are under suspicion of corruption away to another job or position. I firmly believe that the corruption angle is visible to the guy on the street but he or she simply does not have the means to do anything about it. The people in power if pressured enough will switch a few pawns around until the general public seems to be pleased with the solution they came up with, and then it's bussiness as usual.


      http://www.transparency.org/policy_research/surveys_indices/cpi/2007

      and then on the corruption preception index aruba is put together with the netherlands and all is fine.
      but all countries surrounding aruba are bright red.

      and i think the justice system on aruba is very different from the netherlands for quite a few reasons so they shouldn't put it together with the netherlands. there's a different book of law and a independent OM.
      they share the same queen and the same supreme court, but the supreme court reverts back to lower court, doesn't handle cases themselves.
      and also the colonial contract judges and prosecutors make things different.
      they don't send aruba judges of prosecutors to the netherlands for 3 years or do they?

      I posted this a while back and i m not saying that's why she went to aruba but ......

      http://www.blikopdewereld.nl/economie/de_zaak_koch.htm

      Officier van Justitie Janssen en onderzoeksrechter W.-Bruinsma zijn in het voortraject volgens Moszkowicz opmerkelijk vriendelijk voor Koch geweest. ,,Wat weten we van zijn ziekte? Alleen wat hij zelf zegt. Ik heb nooit een medische onderbouwing gezien. De indruk zou kunnen ontstaan dat er tussen de verdachte en het Openbaar Ministerie een overeenkomst is gesloten, om Koch zo ver te krijgen hen op een andere manier van informatie te voorzien,'' stelde de raadsman. Officier van Justitie K. Janssen reageerde niet op deze aantijging.

      Karin Janssen and Moszkowicz have been om opposite sides in court before....

      This was in the biggest investement scam (about 145mil guilders +/- 65mil Euros)  in Holland to date
      It involves a german guy named Koch

      Short Translation of the above:

      Karin Jansen "officer of justice" (srry don t know the english term) and judge Bruinsma have according to Moszkowicz been remarkably friendly to Koch (Janssen and Bruinsma claimed he was to sick to be interrogated)
      Moszkowicz: What do we know about this illness? Only what Kock himself says. I have never seen any medical evidence of illness. The impression could arise that the suspect and the Openbaar Ministerie have made some sort of deal. Karen Janssen chose not to react to this accusation of Moszkowicz

      Oh and... Karen Jansen never witnessed the end of this case cuse she was sent to Aruba.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Castaglance on March 03, 2008, 06:50:14 PM
      First, Monkeys rock!  Thanks Kyle, great commentary.
      Rob... I liked the Pirate reference are you from that slippy area?


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: sirensong on March 03, 2008, 06:52:52 PM
      "Field Project Manager, Geophysical Engineer and Marine Geologist on board the R/V Persistence. Responsible for side scan sonar acquisition, digital processing, analysis, and target identification and location. I will assist in side scan sonar operation and guide the ROV (remotely operated vehicle) team to each sonar target after I pick and analyse each sonar target."

      http://geosolutions.blogspot.com/

      Hardly a cabin boy.

      I do not doubt for one minute that Kyle is very qualified in his profession ... I do not doubt for one minute that Kyle motives in locating the remains of Natalee Hollway were very sincere.

      However ... somewhere along the way Kyle was influenced to believe that those within the Aruban investigation were the "good guys" and ... the media which was the sole reason that the Natalee Holloway case did not become a faded memory was the "bad guy".

      The following post spoke volumes to me in regards to Kyle naïveté in regards to the dynamics encompassing the "powers that be" in the Aruban investigation who have been behind the coverup which has been denying Natalee Holloway justice.

      I cannot comprehend that Kyle would have posted the following words if he had done his homework.  If only he had read Dave Holloway's ... Corruption in Paradise or ... Beth Holloway's ... Loving Natalee.

      In November, 2005 ... Dave Holloway conceded that his cooperation with the enemy had not worked.  Dave learned that his goal for justice to prevail for his precious daughter did not reflect ... the Aruban goal to distance Joran and Paulus from implication.

      Janet

      ++++++++

      oceanexploration
      Re: Natalee Case Discussion #715 1/25 -
      « Reply #103 on: January 26, 2008, 12:38:25 PM »


      Thought you all may find this interesting if you're willing to accept it-

      To date, the Aruban police and dive team has been a tremendous help.  They've honestly done a great job. Over the last month we've established a very good working relationship based on openness and trust.  Most of the relationship success was due to getting the media out of the way and working together shoulder to shoulder over time.  We've helped each other however and whenever we can.  They've treated us with decency and respect and we have treated them as friends and allies, which they are. Most of the police and divers are new since this case started and both eager and careful to do things right.  I wish we had a month ahead of the project just to establish the relationships and trust. I know many of you would likely doubt this view, but it's based on the experiences in the field of the entire search team. I too was extremely worried, paranoid, and suspecting in the beginning.  Now, it's clear we're all working towards a common goal.


      Dave Holloway
      On the Record w/ Greta
      November 17, 2005


      HOLLOWAY: ... I made sure that the prime minister understood our position. You know, I had been holding off on this boycott as long as I could, and I told him, I said, you know, The big wave is coming, and if you guys are not going to listen, I can't help you anymore.

      http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,175925,00.html


      Dave Holloway
      On the Record w/ Greta
      April 11, 2006


      HOLLOWAY: Oh, the media was our best friend. If it hadn't been for the media this thing would have been swept under the table the very first day and we'd have been calling back to Aruba "Have you heard anything? Have you heard anything?" I truly believe that.

      http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,191377,00.html


      I have done my homework. Not all that I posted is geared journalistically.  Some things I had written were specifically geared to send a message.  At times, this message was for only a few people.  This post at SM "praising Aruban authorities" was done with contextual purpose. Eveything I write ends up being read by people who are extremely interested and close to the case.  In context, we (the search team) needed to rapidly gain the trust and cooperation of the Aruban authorities.  Before we arrived, here was no trust, little cooperation, and no sharing of information. Take this for what it's worth:  Keep your friends close and your enemies closer.  Also, don't make assumptions about what I have or have not read.

      Not all that I write is my true feelings but is aimed at true purpose. Not everything is clear or should be taken just at face value.

      OE, I just want to say I think the world of you.  I see who you are through your postings.  I never doubted you know exactly what you are doing, and who you are doing it for.   I also know you could care less about any negative speculations about you; it is clear who you serve.  Please let the crew, the owners and the search teams know that we are humbled by their generosity of time, money, expertise and the spirit in which they have given them.  I can't even put into words  my appreciation and deep sense of love and respect I have for you all.  God bless.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: cubbeegirl on March 03, 2008, 06:54:25 PM
      I have to run out for the evening.  I'm not commenting more at this time about the trap or it's contents. 

      1. Why not? You must be aware there is more speculation than facts in these forums.

      2. If you refuse to comment on the contents we will have to assume, remains were found and your response is a legalistic "no comment"

      Oh come on Gang... give OE   a break... He has a job to do with certain rules in place!

      Why keep asking him to break the rules?   Hell I bet he wants to talk about it but has enough integertiy NOT to.
      JMO of course



      Ummm.... I am totally with you on this one old fart... I don't think that OE is playing any,"I know something you don't know" games. He plain and simply cannot tell everything at this point in time....
      I am a very patient girl, I have been here almost 3 years and am willing to wait until the time is right to hear more.... I am sure that at that point in time OE will fill us in JMO


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: KarmaRoundUp on March 03, 2008, 06:54:48 PM
      Peter R de Vries on Robert Jensen Show

      -talking about the book-incident on DWDD, they show the clip
      -tomorrow Beth will be on, pre-recorded, Beth told Robert that she's very grateful to Peter
      -behind the scenes a lot going on, investigation re-opened
      -Joran still murder-suspect
      -cannot be solved within one week, takes time
      -Robert could tell that when Joran was on his show, that he was holding back, 99% of the audience felt that too, not that he was lying but he was holding back information, he knew more than he was letting on
      -Peter's investigation in 2006, was clear to Peter then that Joran was involved, it's strange that Joran wanted to remain silent, if you're innocent all you want to do is tell the truth, not remain silent. Joran couldn't answer the simplest questions
      -Peter asked questions on P&W-show (wine incident) Joran couldn't or wouldn't answer
      -Peter's wife said to Anita on P&W-show, while she was helping Peter getting wine out of his eyes: "You educated your son well" in a very sarcastic way
      -Peter still talks to Beth on a regular basis
      HAHAHA!
      I knew Peter's wife said something sarcastic to anita,thank you Jo-An ::MonkeyHaHa::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: BTgirl on March 03, 2008, 06:56:05 PM
      Can you just imagine the shock?....you send pictures
      to the FBI and the next thing you know the pictures
      are on the internet.


      So foolish and so careless.   Stunning.

      Where I work (and it's not a particularly exotic place), EVERYTHING is on a need-to-know basis. I can only imagine the shock I would feel if I gave something to someone in confidentiality and had it show up on the internet later. My first thought would be that I was in for an internal investigation and possibly the loss of my job. I'm not saying this to be ugly about anyone, just saying I can understand Kyle's reaction at seeing the photos on the web.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: JE on March 03, 2008, 06:56:51 PM
      Peter R de Vries on Robert Jensen Show

      -talking about the book-incident on DWDD, they show the clip
      -tomorrow Beth will be on, pre-recorded, Beth told Robert that she's very grateful to Peter
      -behind the scenes a lot going on, investigation re-opened
      -Joran still murder-suspect
      -cannot be solved within one week, takes time
      -Robert could tell that when Joran was on his show, that he was holding back, 99% of the audience felt that too, not that he was lying but he was holding back information, he knew more than he was letting on
      -Peter's investigation in 2006, was clear to Peter then that Joran was involved, it's strange that Joran wanted to remain silent, if you're innocent all you want to do is tell the truth, not remain silent. Joran couldn't answer the simplest questions
      -Peter asked questions on P&W-show (wine incident) Joran couldn't or wouldn't answer
      -Peter's wife said to Anita on P&W-show, while she was helping Peter getting wine out of his eyes: "You educated your son well" in a very sarcastic way
      -Peter still talks to Beth on a regular basis
      HAHAHA!
      I knew Peter's wife said something sarcastic to anita,thank you Jo-An ::MonkeyHaHa::

      Anita's reply was: it seems like i didn't


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Tater on March 03, 2008, 06:57:43 PM
      (http://img136.imageshack.us/img136/1057/skullnocolorur2.jpg)

      Same object that appears to be a skull with color removed and flipped the pic around



      This reminds me of the book by Iris Johansen called Face of Deception..Creepy indeed..


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Anna on March 03, 2008, 06:57:45 PM
      Still keeping an eye on Hugo

      Colombia: Documents Show Growing Relations Between Ecuador's Government and Rebels


      BOGOTA, Colombia —  Colombia's police chief said Monday that documents recovered from a slain rebel leader's computer reveal financial ties between Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez and Colombia's largest guerrilla group, including a recent message that mentions US$300 million in Venezuelan support for the rebels. . . . .

      Chavez has called Colombia's President Alvaro Uribe a "mob boss" and a "liar." In return the Colombian government has expressed its concern at links between Venezuela and the FARC.

      http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,334673,00.html


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Miss Scarlet on March 03, 2008, 07:02:00 PM
      (http://img136.imageshack.us/img136/1057/skullnocolorur2.jpg)

      Same object that appears to be a skull with color removed and flipped the pic around



      This reminds me of the book by Iris Johansen called Face of Deception..Creepy indeed..

      I too think it is a skull.  If it is in fact a skull and DNA proves it not to be Natalee, I hope they let one of those talented people recreate the face.  There is a woman in the US who is particularly excellent at this skill and has worked with many in law enforcement on especially difficult and mysterious cases, but her name escapes me at the moment.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: bluwaters on March 03, 2008, 07:02:19 PM

      I posted this a while back and i m not saying that's why she went to aruba but ......

      http://www.blikopdewereld.nl/economie/de_zaak_koch.htm

      Officier van Justitie Janssen en onderzoeksrechter W.-Bruinsma zijn in het voortraject volgens Moszkowicz opmerkelijk vriendelijk voor Koch geweest. ,,Wat weten we van zijn ziekte? Alleen wat hij zelf zegt. Ik heb nooit een medische onderbouwing gezien. De indruk zou kunnen ontstaan dat er tussen de verdachte en het Openbaar Ministerie een overeenkomst is gesloten, om Koch zo ver te krijgen hen op een andere manier van informatie te voorzien,'' stelde de raadsman. Officier van Justitie K. Janssen reageerde niet op deze aantijging.

      Karin Janssen and Moszkowicz have been om opposite sides in court before....

      This was in the biggest investement scam (about 145mil guilders +/- 65mil Euros)  in Holland to date
      It involves a german guy named Koch

      Short Translation of the above:

      Karin Jansen "officer of justice" (srry don t know the english term) and judge Bruinsma have according to Moszkowicz been remarkably friendly to Koch (Janssen and Bruinsma claimed he was to sick to be interrogated)
      Moszkowicz: What do we know about this illness? Only what Kock himself says. I have never seen any medical evidence of illness. The impression could arise that the suspect and the Openbaar Ministerie have made some sort of deal. Karen Janssen chose not to react to this accusation of Moszkowicz

      Oh and... Karen Jansen never witnessed the end of this case cuse she was sent to Aruba.

      Why does this remind me a bit of Joran's last judicial review, before the case was (briefly) closed? Remember how Hans Mos, the prosecutor, suggested to the court that Joran is mentally ill? The judges evidently considered Mos statement in their decision to release Joran. This was done without the opinion of a qualified mental health professional.

      Why did Mos, the prosecutor, suggest something that favours the defence argument? Why did the judges consider this suggestion with no evidence from a qualified professional to back it up?


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: KarmaRoundUp on March 03, 2008, 07:02:46 PM
      Welcome to all the new Monkey's!
      Good to read you all here.Do any of you know about what kinda salary a person in paulus's position makes?How about anita's position(teacher).....


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Bladerunner on March 03, 2008, 07:03:54 PM
      OE how long does it take to locate a given target with the rover-on average, assuming the boat is relatively close to it. How fast can it descend into the depths? And what about the density of the remaining targets, are they close, scattered, clustered, radom?

      The time it takes to dive and locate a target depends largely on sea conditions and water depth.  In water depth of 400 ft with moderate seas it was consistently taking 5 minutes to locate the target with the ROV based on the side scan data.  The coordinates I was giving the ROV pilot were consistently within a few feet of the actual target and often fell within the actual target.  This precision is only possible with perfect USBL (ultra-short baseline) acoustic navigation and very diligent working.  10 years ago this precision and resolution was not possible.  To answer your question it would take about a day, with daylight operations only, to dive on about 15-25 targets.  We would often "bounce dive" targets of little interest.  The dives are conducted in a combination of priority and distribution.  When targets are widely-spaced, location takes more control on operations.  When targets are close together, highest priority wins.  In any case, the top priority targets are done first regardless.   Basically, we had three levels of priority. 
      P1 targets were targets interpreted to likely be a fish trap.  P2 targets were interpreted to be possible containers or a possible fish trap, but less clear.  P3 targets were targets of little interest, but deemed worthy of inspection. 

      Thanks, I was guessing more like 12 - 15 per day.  That is encouraging from a budgetary perspective in that in should not take an innordinate amount of time to visually inspect the remaining targets. And is it "had" or "have?"   
       ::MonkeyRoll::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Tater on March 03, 2008, 07:04:08 PM
      (http://img136.imageshack.us/img136/1057/skullnocolorur2.jpg)

      Same object that appears to be a skull with color removed and flipped the pic around



      This reminds me of the book by Iris Johansen called Face of Deception..Creepy indeed..

      I too think it is a skull.  If it is in fact a skull and DNA proves it not to be Natalee, I hope they let one of those talented people recreate the face.  There is a woman in the US who is particularly excellent at this skill and has worked with many in law enforcement on especially difficult and mysterious cases, but her name escapes me at the moment.

      How weird that that subject is what this book is about...Very scarey read..


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: bluwaters on March 03, 2008, 07:08:34 PM
      Peter R de Vries on Robert Jensen Show

      -talking about the book-incident on DWDD, they show the clip
      -tomorrow Beth will be on, pre-recorded, Beth told Robert that she's very grateful to Peter
      -behind the scenes a lot going on, investigation re-opened
      -Joran still murder-suspect
      -cannot be solved within one week, takes time
      -Robert could tell that when Joran was on his show, that he was holding back, 99% of the audience felt that too, not that he was lying but he was holding back information, he knew more than he was letting on
      -Peter's investigation in 2006, was clear to Peter then that Joran was involved, it's strange that Joran wanted to remain silent, if you're innocent all you want to do is tell the truth, not remain silent. Joran couldn't answer the simplest questions
      -Peter asked questions on P&W-show (wine incident) Joran couldn't or wouldn't answer
      -Peter's wife said to Anita on P&W-show, while she was helping Peter getting wine out of his eyes: "You educated your son well" in a very sarcastic way
      -Peter still talks to Beth on a regular basis
      HAHAHA!
      I knew Peter's wife said something sarcastic to anita,thank you Jo-An ::MonkeyHaHa::

      Anita's reply was: it seems like i didn't

      JE   ::MonkeyEek::
      Did Anita really say that? Are you making a joke?
      If she really gave that answer, it sounds like she may be finally beginning to get a clue!
      Wow! Anita - snap out of it 

      (http://i92.photobucket.com/albums/l28/TallyAnna/smilies/snapoutofit.gif)


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: caesu on March 03, 2008, 07:09:10 PM
      talking about Karin Janssen:
      (http://i31.tinypic.com/281rh2f.png)

      just click here, the article it is still here.
      http://www.telegraaf.nl/binnenland/article9234541.ece < still online
      http://www.telegraaf.nl/binnenland/923454/_Fraudeofficier_verdacht_van_illegale_bouw_huis__.html < pulled off line

      it was also on another url and it got pulled off the internet a few weeks ago.

      Telegraaf url have also url with the headline, for example this one:
      http://www.telegraaf.nl/binnenland/3456543/_Drugssmokkel_bedreiging__Antillen__.html
      http://www.telegraaf.nl/binnenland/article3456543.ece

      Karin Janssen forgot to ask De Telegraaf to pull the second url as well.  ::MonkeyHaHa::

      i bet this url will be gone soon.
      or maybe not because then it will be too obvious (Karin Janssen are you reading this?)


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Tater on March 03, 2008, 07:10:28 PM
      Assassinated or missing in Venezuela

      Carlos Augusto Aumatrie (assassinated)
      Juan Carlos Urbano Lugo (assassinated)
      Jose Manuel Vilas Liñera (assassinated)
      Omar Arturo Morales
      Juan Jose Perez
      Juan Ernesto Sanchez
      Andres Bastidas Guedes
      Jose Luis Rodriguez
      Eduardo Jose Miranda
      Julio Cesar Gomez
      Rafael Tomas Pulido Marcano (APPEARED BADLY TORTURED)
      Pedro Jose Sanchez Robles (assassinated)
      William Alvarez Morales (assassinated)
      Yormy Rafael Suarez Riveros (assassinated)
      Evangelina Carrizo (assassinated)
      Dictor Damas (assassinated)
      Bruno Biella (assassinated)
      Marvin Carrasco
      Nelly Rodriguez Martinez (assassinated)
      Jose Guevara Reyes (assassinated)
      Juan Carlos Zambrano (assassinated)
      Argenis Dugarte (assassinated)
      Jose Guevara Reyes (assassinated)
      Jose Sanchez Robles (assassinated)
      Jose Luis Ricaurte (assassinated)
      José Antonio Quero
      Carlos Armando López Martínez
      Nelson Alexander Batista
      Orlando Antonio Bustamante, (soldier: severely burnt whilst under military arrest)
      Ángel Ciro Pedreáñez, (soldier: severely burnt whilst under military arrest)
      Maritza Ron, assassinated in Altamira Square on August 16th 2004
      Silvino Bustillos. Gone missing on October 31 2004. Has not been seen since. Allegedly tortured and assassinated by a Military Intelligence squad commanded by National Guard Lieutenant Danny Alfredo Daniels Perez.
      Antonio Lopez Castillo, assassinated by the State police
      Juan Carlos Sanchez, assassinated by the State police
      Romer Luján, (soldier: severely burnt whilst under military arrest)
      Raúl Royett Gutiérrez, (soldier: severely burnt whilst under military arrest)
      Leonardo González Lárez (student), assassinated by a military police death squad on June 27th 2005
      Edgar Quintero Torrealba (student), assassinated by a military police death squad on June 27th 2005
      Erick Miguel Montenegro Sánchez (student), assassinated by a military police death squad on June 27th 2005

      http://www.vcrisis.com/index.php?content=letters/200403020624

      Just no telling who it is in that trap down there if it's human...


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Flipper/Donnie29 on March 03, 2008, 07:11:50 PM
      Peter R de Vries on Robert Jensen Show

      -talking about the book-incident on DWDD, they show the clip
      -tomorrow Beth will be on, pre-recorded, Beth told Robert that she's very grateful to Peter
      -behind the scenes a lot going on, investigation re-opened
      -Joran still murder-suspect
      -cannot be solved within one week, takes time
      -Robert could tell that when Joran was on his show, that he was holding back, 99% of the audience felt that too, not that he was lying but he was holding back information, he knew more than he was letting on
      -Peter's investigation in 2006, was clear to Peter then that Joran was involved, it's strange that Joran wanted to remain silent, if you're innocent all you want to do is tell the truth, not remain silent. Joran couldn't answer the simplest questions
      -Peter asked questions on P&W-show (wine incident) Joran couldn't or wouldn't answer
      -Peter's wife said to Anita on P&W-show, while she was helping Peter getting wine out of his eyes: "You educated your son well" in a very sarcastic way
      -Peter still talks to Beth on a regular basis
      HAHAHA!
      I knew Peter's wife said something sarcastic to anita,thank you Jo-An ::MonkeyHaHa::

      Anita's reply was: it seems like i didn't

      I also watched it tonight, what i didnt saw at pauw en witteman with the wine throwing incident is that Peters wife immediately throw water in Jorans face.. quick reaction  ::MonkeyCool::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Miss Scarlet on March 03, 2008, 07:19:15 PM
      (http://img136.imageshack.us/img136/1057/skullnocolorur2.jpg)

      Same object that appears to be a skull with color removed and flipped the pic around



      This reminds me of the book by Iris Johansen called Face of Deception..Creepy indeed..

      I too think it is a skull.  If it is in fact a skull and DNA proves it not to be Natalee, I hope they let one of those talented people recreate the face.  There is a woman in the US who is particularly excellent at this skill and has worked with many in law enforcement on especially difficult and mysterious cases, but her name escapes me at the moment.

      How weird that that subject is what this book is about...Very scarey read..

      That might be her - not sure.  The woman I was referring to has worked with John Walsh on several high profile cases.  One that comes to mind is the one in south Florida where a hiker stumbled upon eight (I think) skeletal remains.  She recreated all their faces and was so accurate they were almost all immediately identified by their families.  The reconstructions side by side by the persons photographs were remarkable.  Absolutely amazing.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: caesu on March 03, 2008, 07:26:56 PM
      Assassinated or missing in Venezuela

      Carlos Augusto Aumatrie (assassinated)
      Juan Carlos Urbano Lugo (assassinated)
      Jose Manuel Vilas Liñera (assassinated)
      Omar Arturo Morales
      Juan Jose Perez
      Juan Ernesto Sanchez
      Andres Bastidas Guedes
      Jose Luis Rodriguez
      Eduardo Jose Miranda
      Julio Cesar Gomez
      Rafael Tomas Pulido Marcano (APPEARED BADLY TORTURED)
      Pedro Jose Sanchez Robles (assassinated)
      William Alvarez Morales (assassinated)
      Yormy Rafael Suarez Riveros (assassinated)
      Evangelina Carrizo (assassinated)
      Dictor Damas (assassinated)
      Bruno Biella (assassinated)
      Marvin Carrasco
      Nelly Rodriguez Martinez (assassinated)
      Jose Guevara Reyes (assassinated)
      Juan Carlos Zambrano (assassinated)
      Argenis Dugarte (assassinated)
      Jose Guevara Reyes (assassinated)
      Jose Sanchez Robles (assassinated)
      Jose Luis Ricaurte (assassinated)
      José Antonio Quero
      Carlos Armando López Martínez
      Nelson Alexander Batista
      Orlando Antonio Bustamante, (soldier: severely burnt whilst under military arrest)
      Ángel Ciro Pedreáñez, (soldier: severely burnt whilst under military arrest)
      Maritza Ron, assassinated in Altamira Square on August 16th 2004
      Silvino Bustillos. Gone missing on October 31 2004. Has not been seen since. Allegedly tortured and assassinated by a Military Intelligence squad commanded by National Guard Lieutenant Danny Alfredo Daniels Perez.
      Antonio Lopez Castillo, assassinated by the State police
      Juan Carlos Sanchez, assassinated by the State police
      Romer Luján, (soldier: severely burnt whilst under military arrest)
      Raúl Royett Gutiérrez, (soldier: severely burnt whilst under military arrest)
      Leonardo González Lárez (student), assassinated by a military police death squad on June 27th 2005
      Edgar Quintero Torrealba (student), assassinated by a military police death squad on June 27th 2005
      Erick Miguel Montenegro Sánchez (student), assassinated by a military police death squad on June 27th 2005

      http://www.vcrisis.com/index.php?content=letters/200403020624

      Just no telling who it is in that trap down there if it's human...


      yes it is said that venezuela is the most dangerous country in s-america and caracas the most dangerous city.
      of course this is disputable, but dangerous it is for a fact.
      coming week a dutch travel program starts and they hitchhike from mexico to venezuela.
      i am sure they've got a lot of bodyguards with them in venezuela. must have.
      as a tourist you can't go for a walk in venezuelan city. as a local it is fine.
      if a money transport has to visit a bank they've got half an army battalion surroundig the bank and blocking a streets with huge automatic machine guns ready to fire pointing in all directions. i thought wtf is happening here. it was just a regular money transport.

      colombia has their coast protected in some way so drugs can go to venezuela and then cariben and of to the us and europa.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Ono on March 03, 2008, 07:44:10 PM
      Can you just imagine the shock?....you send pictures
      to the FBI and the next thing you know the pictures
      are on the internet.


      So foolish and so careless.   Stunning.

      Where I work (and it's not a particularly exotic place), EVERYTHING is on a need-to-know basis. I can only imagine the shock I would feel if I gave something to someone in confidentiality and had it show up on the internet later. My first thought would be that I was in for an internal investigation and possibly the loss of my job. I'm not saying this to be ugly about anyone, just saying I can understand Kyle's reaction at seeing the photos on the web.


      Most likely, the person so close to the case was tired and acted in reckless abandon before thinking.  [ I bet the FBI was surprised. ]


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: martini on March 03, 2008, 07:46:03 PM
      (http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/4176/skullcm4.jpg)

      nice necktie  ::MonkeyNoNo::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Dayhiker on March 03, 2008, 07:46:49 PM

      Thanks GMBW and a belated welcome to the board. One thing that has been persistently missing in the Dutch media is the corruption angle in Aruba. It's so damn obvious. I wish they would jump on that more. I hope this is something Peter is working on behind the scenes.

      I think the problem with "western" democracies is that the powers that rule want everyone to believe that corruption is a problem of third world countries. It only happens in the "bananna republics " of this planet. In our civilized societies, Europe, the US etc there is no such thing. WRONG it happens everywhere at all levels. Most people in power have a personal agenda. Be it money, a need for power, status, whatever. We just seem to have a notion that it is better, so that no one is embarrassed, to promote people that are under suspicion of corruption away to another job or position. I firmly believe that the corruption angle is visible to the guy on the street but he or she simply does not have the means to do anything about it. The people in power if pressured enough will switch a few pawns around until the general public seems to be pleased with the solution they came up with, and then it's bussiness as usual.



      I see corruption everywhere JE, just not as blatant and obvious as it was in Natalee's case. Typically there's nothing Americans relish more than stringing one of their own up who are caught with their hand in the till. Aruba is different for several reasons. First off we are talking about a person's life being taken and people in a wide variety of the government participating in covering it up, from ALE to the prosecutor to the judges to the tourism authority and most likely all the top with Rudy and Nelson. No county or municipality in the US could get away with that. Those officials would be on trial in a heartbeat.

      Secondly, they were so bad at it. The officials in Aruba must have known the first week they were under the microscope of the US media but they just kept covering it up and covering it up until it was too late to turn it around and get justice. A very stupid bunch of mothertruckers and they deserve to be boycotted until they get justice for Natalee and her family.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Ono on March 03, 2008, 07:53:57 PM
      Can you just imagine the shock?....you send pictures
      to the FBI and the next thing you know the pictures
      are on the internet.


      So foolish and so careless.   Stunning.

      Where I work (and it's not a particularly exotic place), EVERYTHING is on a need-to-know basis. I can only imagine the shock I would feel if I gave something to someone in confidentiality and had it show up on the internet later. My first thought would be that I was in for an internal investigation and possibly the loss of my job. I'm not saying this to be ugly about anyone, just saying I can understand Kyle's reaction at seeing the photos on the web.


      Most likely, the person so close to the case was tired and acted in reckless abandon before thinking.  [ I bet the FBI was surprised. ]

      Edited to add:.......and before sharing with someone who then turned around and posted them on the internet. 


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: KarmaRoundUp on March 03, 2008, 07:56:50 PM
      Peter R de Vries on Robert Jensen Show

      -talking about the book-incident on DWDD, they show the clip
      -tomorrow Beth will be on, pre-recorded, Beth told Robert that she's very grateful to Peter
      -behind the scenes a lot going on, investigation re-opened
      -Joran still murder-suspect
      -cannot be solved within one week, takes time
      -Robert could tell that when Joran was on his show, that he was holding back, 99% of the audience felt that too, not that he was lying but he was holding back information, he knew more than he was letting on
      -Peter's investigation in 2006, was clear to Peter then that Joran was involved, it's strange that Joran wanted to remain silent, if you're innocent all you want to do is tell the truth, not remain silent. Joran couldn't answer the simplest questions
      -Peter asked questions on P&W-show (wine incident) Joran couldn't or wouldn't answer
      -Peter's wife said to Anita on P&W-show, while she was helping Peter getting wine out of his eyes: "You educated your son well" in a very sarcastic way
      -Peter still talks to Beth on a regular basis
      HAHAHA!
      I knew Peter's wife said something sarcastic to anita,thank you Jo-An ::MonkeyHaHa::

      Anita's reply was: it seems like i didn't
      LOL....anita is in her self imposed"blind as a bat"mode.
      :)


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Dayhiker on March 03, 2008, 07:59:00 PM

      Why does this remind me a bit of Joran's last judicial review, before the case was (briefly) closed? Remember how Hans Mos, the prosecutor, suggested to the court that Joran is mentally ill? The judges evidently considered Mos statement in their decision to release Joran. This was done without the opinion of a qualified mental health professional.

      Why did Mos, the prosecutor, suggest something that favours the defence argument? Why did the judges consider this suggestion with no evidence from a qualified professional to back it up?


      This is the reason I do not trust Hans Less. He really appears to be just going through the motions and intentionally not trying which is, and you hit the nail on the head here Bluwaters, exactly what Karin Jannsen did. Hiding behind the ruse of Dutch law being highly secretive, which we found out later was a lie, she carried out her end of the cover-up without the public scrutiny Van der Straten abd Jacobs got but in the end it has been proven she was every bit as responsible. Certainly she saw Joran's early statements, the ones about the seizures, and colludeed with VDS and DJ to suppress them.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Dayhiker on March 03, 2008, 08:01:13 PM
      Beth will be on Jensen show tomorrow but..... tonite Peter R de Vries will be on!!!
      Starts in 10 mins!!!!!!  ::MonkeyDance::
      Will keep you updated.

      Jo-An  - Thanks!  I heard Beth will also be on Paul & Wittman (sp) tomorrow.

      Do you happen to know if she will be the only guest? Uhmm...well that hasn't happened yet on that show so probably that's just wishfull thinking...perhaps with Peter R. de Vries & Patrick van der Eem (or is he still in Aruba)? Then they will really have some time to talk about the case / the corruption.


      She will talk openly about the corruption GMBW, has done so in US media, I hope they get into it with her.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: KarmaRoundUp on March 03, 2008, 08:03:00 PM
      Peter R de Vries on Robert Jensen Show

      -talking about the book-incident on DWDD, they show the clip
      -tomorrow Beth will be on, pre-recorded, Beth told Robert that she's very grateful to Peter
      -behind the scenes a lot going on, investigation re-opened
      -Joran still murder-suspect
      -cannot be solved within one week, takes time
      -Robert could tell that when Joran was on his show, that he was holding back, 99% of the audience felt that too, not that he was lying but he was holding back information, he knew more than he was letting on
      -Peter's investigation in 2006, was clear to Peter then that Joran was involved, it's strange that Joran wanted to remain silent, if you're innocent all you want to do is tell the truth, not remain silent. Joran couldn't answer the simplest questions
      -Peter asked questions on P&W-show (wine incident) Joran couldn't or wouldn't answer
      -Peter's wife said to Anita on P&W-show, while she was helping Peter getting wine out of his eyes: "You educated your son well" in a very sarcastic way
      -Peter still talks to Beth on a regular basis
      HAHAHA!
      I knew Peter's wife said something sarcastic to anita,thank you Jo-An ::MonkeyHaHa::

      Anita's reply was: it seems like i didn't

      JE   ::MonkeyEek::
      Did Anita really say that? Are you making a joke?
      If she really gave that answer, it sounds like she may be finally beginning to get a clue!
      Wow! Anita - snap out of it 

      (http://i92.photobucket.com/albums/l28/TallyAnna/smilies/snapoutofit.gif)
      LOL....I'm really enjoying your little smileys BluWaters ::MonkeyWink::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Dayhiker on March 03, 2008, 08:03:17 PM

      i did have high hopes in nico jörg, the procureur general. that's is something like the one person down from rudy croes.
      i read some good articles about him.
      but he is the care taker procureur general since fernandez-croes announce stepping down by january 2008 but already went on leave juli 2007.
      so i think very soon rudy croes will replace nico jörg with one of his cronies.
      which is a shame because nico jörg seems to be a good one. but he got frustrated by rudy croes, that's what i read between the lines.
      maybe he will speak out after he get replaced...


      Nico did have the balls to castigate Paulus Van der Sloot in public, Caesu, will give him that. He is the only one down there working with the government who has had the cahones to do so.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Tater on March 03, 2008, 08:05:06 PM
      Assassinated or missing in Venezuela

      Carlos Augusto Aumatrie (assassinated)
      Juan Carlos Urbano Lugo (assassinated)
      Jose Manuel Vilas Liñera (assassinated)
      Omar Arturo Morales
      Juan Jose Perez
      Juan Ernesto Sanchez
      Andres Bastidas Guedes
      Jose Luis Rodriguez
      Eduardo Jose Miranda
      Julio Cesar Gomez
      Rafael Tomas Pulido Marcano (APPEARED BADLY TORTURED)
      Pedro Jose Sanchez Robles (assassinated)
      William Alvarez Morales (assassinated)
      Yormy Rafael Suarez Riveros (assassinated)
      Evangelina Carrizo (assassinated)
      Dictor Damas (assassinated)
      Bruno Biella (assassinated)
      Marvin Carrasco
      Nelly Rodriguez Martinez (assassinated)
      Jose Guevara Reyes (assassinated)
      Juan Carlos Zambrano (assassinated)
      Argenis Dugarte (assassinated)
      Jose Guevara Reyes (assassinated)
      Jose Sanchez Robles (assassinated)
      Jose Luis Ricaurte (assassinated)
      José Antonio Quero
      Carlos Armando López Martínez
      Nelson Alexander Batista
      Orlando Antonio Bustamante, (soldier: severely burnt whilst under military arrest)
      Ángel Ciro Pedreáñez, (soldier: severely burnt whilst under military arrest)
      Maritza Ron, assassinated in Altamira Square on August 16th 2004
      Silvino Bustillos. Gone missing on October 31 2004. Has not been seen since. Allegedly tortured and assassinated by a Military Intelligence squad commanded by National Guard Lieutenant Danny Alfredo Daniels Perez.
      Antonio Lopez Castillo, assassinated by the State police
      Juan Carlos Sanchez, assassinated by the State police
      Romer Luján, (soldier: severely burnt whilst under military arrest)
      Raúl Royett Gutiérrez, (soldier: severely burnt whilst under military arrest)
      Leonardo González Lárez (student), assassinated by a military police death squad on June 27th 2005
      Edgar Quintero Torrealba (student), assassinated by a military police death squad on June 27th 2005
      Erick Miguel Montenegro Sánchez (student), assassinated by a military police death squad on June 27th 2005

      http://www.vcrisis.com/index.php?content=letters/200403020624

      Just no telling who it is in that trap down there if it's human...


      yes it is said that venezuela is the most dangerous country in s-america and caracas the most dangerous city.
      of course this is disputable, but dangerous it is for a fact.
      coming week a dutch travel program starts and they hitchhike from mexico to venezuela.
      i am sure they've got a lot of bodyguards with them in venezuela. must have.
      as a tourist you can't go for a walk in venezuelan city. as a local it is fine.
      if a money transport has to visit a bank they've got half an army battalion surroundig the bank and blocking a streets with huge automatic machine guns ready to fire pointing in all directions. i thought wtf is happening here. it was just a regular money transport.

      colombia has their coast protected in some way so drugs can go to venezuela and then cariben and of to the us and europa.
      [/quote


      I don't guess I'll be going there anytime soon.I do wish I could see this program you are talking about.It would be interesting to watch..
      It could even be Amy Bradley in that cage.She wasn't ever found either...


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Dayhiker on March 03, 2008, 08:06:36 PM

      Thanks GMBW and a belated welcome to the board. One thing that has been persistently missing in the Dutch media is the corruption angle in Aruba. It's so damn obvious. I wish they would jump on that more. I hope this is something Peter is working on behind the scenes.

      I think he's trying very hard to do so...he did it in his first special when the angle of  'the friend of the family' opening the door at the Van der Sloots house when the housesearch was going to happen was very important in the show...and with the cellphone - prison thing in his latest special.
      He has said  that he's got 'his own ideas' about Paul van der Sloot (and we all know what that means ;-)...). But he won't say it out loud if he doesn't have stuff to back it up. In his position credibility means just about everything & because of that he can't say things without proof. But he is aware of Paul van der Sloot & his buddies helping out Joran and ???; the rest of the media seem to have focused on Joran.

      Maybe it's also because the media can't really bring it up since it's mostly news / talkshows that bring the case. News: you need prove / Talkshow: not too much detail & difficulty concerning the subject...10 / 15 minutes max. for an item.
      Newspapers should have picked it up though; it's weird they haven't really done that.


      You know Peter much better than we do being in Holland, but we have heard that he not only investigates murders with vigor but like to bust the occasional corrupt politician as well. Is this true?


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: KarmaRoundUp on March 03, 2008, 08:06:41 PM
      Peter R de Vries on Robert Jensen Show

      -talking about the book-incident on DWDD, they show the clip
      -tomorrow Beth will be on, pre-recorded, Beth told Robert that she's very grateful to Peter
      -behind the scenes a lot going on, investigation re-opened
      -Joran still murder-suspect
      -cannot be solved within one week, takes time
      -Robert could tell that when Joran was on his show, that he was holding back, 99% of the audience felt that too, not that he was lying but he was holding back information, he knew more than he was letting on
      -Peter's investigation in 2006, was clear to Peter then that Joran was involved, it's strange that Joran wanted to remain silent, if you're innocent all you want to do is tell the truth, not remain silent. Joran couldn't answer the simplest questions
      -Peter asked questions on P&W-show (wine incident) Joran couldn't or wouldn't answer
      -Peter's wife said to Anita on P&W-show, while she was helping Peter getting wine out of his eyes: "You educated your son well" in a very sarcastic way
      -Peter still talks to Beth on a regular basis
      HAHAHA!
      I knew Peter's wife said something sarcastic to anita,thank you Jo-An ::MonkeyHaHa::

      Anita's reply was: it seems like i didn't

      I also watched it tonight, what i didnt saw at pauw en witteman with the wine throwing incident is that Peters wife immediately throw water in Jorans face.. quick reaction  ::MonkeyCool::
      Aha!
      Thanks Flipper,I thought I saw the same thing when watching UTube. ::MonkeyLaugh::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Dayhiker on March 03, 2008, 08:09:49 PM

      Any chance they drug Van der Straten's ass back to Holland to allow him to bail himself out of the cover-up? He's an obvious target.

      According to Jan himself he has political aspirations in the Antilles. I think Dompig's Shieldgroup is no longer in business as well so they both may be out of work. Dompig is currently in the running for a high level position with the ALE.


      Hope they have forums we can use to show people the REAL Van der Straten. I'd love to help sink the bastard.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: private eye on March 03, 2008, 08:10:27 PM
      No comment on the contents of the cage is still odd, after describing in detail the gae size and dimensions. The quick "thumbs down" signal from the dive team tells me it was nothing. Likely OE has signed a privacy and intelluctual rights agreement. All photos and information property of the company. I would expect a book deal, with detailed photos and a daily log outlining the search. This will allow a portion of the search expenses to be recovered.

      Yes, we owe the search team our gratitute, However, if they wont comment, there is nothing preventing them from explaning why no comment. Thats a reasonable expectation.


      That cage did not hold Natalee.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Tater on March 03, 2008, 08:12:27 PM
      No comment on the contents of the cage is still odd, after describing in detail the gae size and dimensions. The quick "thumbs down" signal from the dive team tells me it was nothing. Likely OE has signed a privacy and intelluctual rights agreement. All photos and information property of the company. I would expect a book deal, with detailed photos and a daily log outlining the search. This will allow a portion of the search expenses to be recovered.

      Yes, we owe the search team our gratitute, However, if they wont comment, there is nothing preventing them from explaning why no comment. Thats a reasonable expectation.


      That cage did not hold Natalee.

      You say that with such conviction..I believe you...:(


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: hotping on March 03, 2008, 08:17:20 PM
      Me Too Tot! I Believe Him!  ::MonkeyNoNo::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Dayhiker on March 03, 2008, 08:20:53 PM

      From the 45 justices working for the Court of Aruba and the Antilles:

      11 started working there after Paul van der Sloot became a suspect
      15 started working there much later than Paul van der Sloot

      Only 19 might be friends of Paul van der Sloot and of them 14 were Curacao justices.



      Didn't Paulus work for a year in Curacao with those justices? That would make the whole thing about bringing in judges from Curacao so there would be no "conflict of interest" a total sham. I have no doubt he knew these judges every bit as well as the ones in Aruba. 45 judges total on both islands, that's a small group of peers.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: private eye on March 03, 2008, 08:26:16 PM
      Kyle should be allowed to post here without being hounded to release information he cannot release, and when in doubt he should decline. But I feel that he should be welcomed here as a poster with no expectations of him to provide or disclose information, just as the rest of us do. I thought he kind of popped off once, but looking back, I have certainly done that myself, many times. The rest of the time he has posted pertinent, well written considerate posts, and he has spent 3 months looking for Natalee on a boat, so surely we can forget the one post that hurt our feelings, move on, and make him feel welcomed. He is young, and will bring the perspective of youth, knowledgeable about water and underwater searches, and directly invovled in this search.

      So for myself, I want to apologize to Kyle if anything I said hurt his feelings or pissed him off, remind him of all of the glowing comments I have tossed his way, and welcome him here without any harrassment to disclose that which he is uncomfortable disclosing. If we make it so unpleasant for him to post he will simply avoid the cage, and his tour of duty is up for now so he should be encouraged to post as a friend of Natalee's and Beth. He has certainly earned that right and in  my opinion he has stood for the girl in a great big way.

      But I want him to know that Red has certainly earned his stripes and deserves to be respected as well. I know Beth would hate to have to choose between two modern day heros:) This is a big cage:))))))


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Anna on March 03, 2008, 08:28:39 PM
      Venezuela's Chavez May Have Given $300 Million to Colombia's Leftist Rebels, Police Say

      http://www.theledger.com/article/20080303/BREAKING/581926771

      Nuggets:

      “When they mention negotiations for 50 kilos of uranium this means that the FARC are taking big steps in the world of terrorism to become a global aggressor. We’re not talking of domestic guerrilla but transnational terrorism,” said Naranjo, without giving more details.


       ::MonkeyShocked::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Tater on March 03, 2008, 08:31:19 PM
      Me Too Tot! I Believe Him!  ::MonkeyNoNo::



       :smt022


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: oceanexploration on March 03, 2008, 08:34:25 PM
      To clarify the thumb down issue:

      -It was agreed immediately before the 30-Dec dive that 2 thumbs up (by Tim Trahan) meant positive ID on Natalee from something conclusive.
      -One thumb up was to indicate human remains

      -There was no set signal pre-dive for anything but the above scenarios.
       
      By Tim's own admission, his observation of the inside of the trap (lasting a few seconds) was inconclusive. His signal indicated an inconclusive observation referring to the object said by some to be a skull, a hardened sponge by others...
      What you can't see is immediately before Tim approached the trap opening, a large skate stirred up sediment reducing visibility.
      The quick signal came because the dive time was nearly up .


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: hotping on March 03, 2008, 08:34:58 PM
      Me Too Tot! I Believe Him!  ::MonkeyNoNo::



       :smt022
      Angels sometimes block our path because we are heading in the wrong direction.

      -Ann Spangler,
      "An Angel a Day"


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: klaasend on March 03, 2008, 08:35:56 PM
      http://nholloway.blogspot.com/2008/02/xviii-sonar-search-complete.html

      Update: Mon 03-March 1345 hrs

      With the sonar search completed, the RV Persistence sets sail heading to its home port in Louisiana. With mixed emotions, the search team returns home. When we arrived in Aruba in mid-December we were mentally prepared to return home either having found Natalee, or after having exhausted all possibilities in the quest to find her. It is difficult going home with many questions left unanswered and so many sonar targets remaining to be explored. Our comfort lies in knowledge that we have done the best job we could, that we can return to dive on the remaining targets when funded, and that answers may come in time. We feel that the search is not over but rather entering a new phase. We are thankful for the outpouring of generosity, love, support, and prayers throughout the entire search effort.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: private eye on March 03, 2008, 08:37:39 PM
      To clarify the thumb down issue:

      -It was agreed immediately before the 30-Dec dive that 2 thumbs up (by Tim Trahan) meant positive ID on Natalee from something conclusive.
      -One thumb up was to indicate human remains

      -There was no set signal pre-dive for anything but the above scenarios.
       
      By Tim's own admission, his observation of the inside of the trap (lasting a few seconds) was inconclusive. His signal indicated an inconclusive observation referring to the object said by some to be a skull, a hardened sponge by others...
      What you can't see is immediately before Tim approached the trap opening, a large skate stirred up sediment reducing visibility.
      The quick signal came because the dive time was nearly up .

      Ocean Ex, don't feel obligated to answer anything your even the least bit uncomfortable answering. I think eveyone just wants you to be able to relax, enjoy the group, offer what you can, with no expectations from us of you.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: hotping on March 03, 2008, 08:37:59 PM
      Thank You Klaas!


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: klaasend on March 03, 2008, 08:38:10 PM
      Probably already posted but anyway:

      A response out of Aruba to this report:

       03 mrt 2008, 18.14  ' Aruba transit port of heroin '

      ORANJESTAD - Aruba is a transit port for heroin and to a lesser degree of cocaine. Drug use on the island, also under tourists, remains a point of care. Stands in a report which The international Narcotics Strategy Friday to the American congress in America to report (INSCR) have offered. The report over the year 2007 has been made Monday public.

      The drugs would further be transported as from the island by means of cruising ships which put on Aruba and the daily flights as from the island to America and Europe. According to the report Aruba is interesting for smugglers by the ' good infrastructure, excellent flight connections and relatively light punish for drug trafficking in relatively good circumstances '.

      The report communicates that Aruba has crime indeed little, but that becomes clear that from crime research in 2007, ' prominent on the island has established drug traffickers '.

       The Public Prosecution Service on Aruba "does not understand" on which the US base their conclusion concerning Aruba. According to head officier Hans mos there was previous year on the island one capture of thirteen kilos heroin. That is no large quantity. By remainder are talk of a decreasing recent development, in 2000, 78 kilos were intercepted there there. Both in heroin and in cocaine and ecstasy considerably less is acted by the stricter supervision, among which the hundred percent controls in the Netherlands.

      http://www.telegraaf.nl/binnenland/3457453/__Aruba_doorvoerhaven_van_herone___.html?p=1,1


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: jackb on March 03, 2008, 08:41:36 PM
      (http://img136.imageshack.us/img136/1057/skullnocolorur2.jpg)

      Same object that appears to be a skull with color removed and flipped the pic around



      This reminds me of the book by Iris Johansen called Face of Deception..Creepy indeed..

      I too think it is a skull.  If it is in fact a skull and DNA proves it not to be Natalee, I hope they let one of those talented people recreate the face.  There is a woman in the US who is particularly excellent at this skill and has worked with many in law enforcement on especially difficult and mysterious cases, but her name escapes me at the moment.

      How weird that that subject is what this book is about...Very scarey read..

      That might be her - not sure.  The woman I was referring to has worked with John Walsh on several high profile cases.  One that comes to mind is the one in south Florida where a hiker stumbled upon eight (I think) skeletal remains.  She recreated all their faces and was so accurate they were almost all immediately identified by their families.  The reconstructions side by side by the persons photographs were remarkable.  Absolutely amazing.

      Kermit and friends:  Just sent Klass a more visable version of what you posted.  Naner, naner, nanter (as the lady said,)  you will see something most of the other people on the other blogs have not.  What you will be seeing is a top and side view where you are looking down into the skull.  It appears the eye socket holder is in the (my)  left lower corner of the pic I sent.  It is your picture I messed with this time Kermit, the one you posted.
      Just made it a bit more visable.  If Klass will send it it is in her e-mail.  LOL
       blue the strange. 


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: private eye on March 03, 2008, 08:43:22 PM
      To clarify the thumb down issue:

      -It was agreed immediately before the 30-Dec dive that 2 thumbs up (by Tim Trahan) meant positive ID on Natalee from something conclusive.
      -One thumb up was to indicate human remains

      -There was no set signal pre-dive for anything but the above scenarios.
       
      By Tim's own admission, his observation of the inside of the trap (lasting a few seconds) was inconclusive. His signal indicated an inconclusive observation referring to the object said by some to be a skull, a hardened sponge by others...
      What you can't see is immediately before Tim approached the trap opening, a large skate stirred up sediment reducing visibility.
      The quick signal came because the dive time was nearly up .

      Ocean Ex, don't feel obligated to answer anything your even the least bit uncomfortable answering. I think eveyone just wants you to be able to relax, enjoy the group, offer what you can, with no expectations from us of you.

      Of course anything you can offer is appreciated: And don't worry about posting some stupid because I already have all of those records:)


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: klaasend on March 03, 2008, 08:44:42 PM
      http://www.amigoe.com/artman/publish/artikel_40252.php

      Translated through google:

      Suspect miljoenenfraude at Lands laboratory arrested
      March 3, 2008, 18:42 (GMT -04:00)

        Email this article
        Print this article
         
         ORANJESTAD - The American authorities have Aruba at the request of a 53-year-old man arrested is suspected to have 5 million florin darkened laboratory at the Lands for which he worked. The arrest took place last Saturday in Miami at the request of the Public Prosecutor's Office (OM).

      The Landslaboratorium did at the end of last year declaration of the massive fraud. The ex-employee M.M.F. Was at that time already fled to Colombia. The OM issued an international opsporingbevel, with success. When the man last Thursday traveled to the United States, it was for by the American authorities getipt. "We have a Friday request for a provisional arrest and Saturday he was arrested," says Chief Hans Mos who are very satisfied with the good cooperation with the American authorities.

      F. Is suspected of embezzlement in employment, forgery, fraud and money laundering. He would Landslaboratorium the millions afhandig made by placing orders to non-existent companies in the United States. While local media reported that there are 10 million florin is darkened, according Mos far florin to five million in a period of 2002 to 2007. F. Is now in Florida for which Aruba has filed the request for his extradition. Is the suspect agrees to the extradition, the PPS that he expects within two weeks in Aruba.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: jackb on March 03, 2008, 08:44:52 PM
      Old Fart...the Persistence has left Aruba as of this morning at 8:20AM according to LegallyLex at BFN.... there are pictures of the boat leaving but they asked for them not to be moved off the site...  ::MonkeyShocked::


      Yes, I just read that over there. Well, it won't be long before those photos will be all over...starting with RU, I'll bet. Hell, 1/2 of RU are members at BFN and BNH. How do they expect those photos to stay there :roll: . I won't take them, but we all know MANY from RU and BNH sure will!!

      What a way to promote a DONATION. This is ridiculous, like BFN are the only ones that cared, supported and have donated?


      So Kyle is sort of a cabin boy?


      I was catching up this morning and came across the above post and found it odd that it was asked the pics not leave BFN as IF  no one but BFN members are the only ones that care, have supported, donated, spent endless hours..etc ..on and on.

      It's just odd to me that the pics of the Persistence photos leaving Aruba have been requested to stay on BFN.



      Sounds like of like a deliberate snub, doesn't it?

      Well, I'm just not going to be offended anyway.  Their frustration level had to be off the chart.  Maybe Kyle will give us some explanation when he gets home and rested up.  Will withhold judgment until then.

      And even if he doesn't, we are all on the same team.  And Tim Miller was a part of that search and I know he would never want to do anything to snub the Monkeys.

      They all still have my gratitude and prayers and wishes for a return to finish the search if it is deemed likely to find Natalee.

      We have to be uniters and not dividers and all the supporters of Natalee's family must pull together even if we don't always agree on things and I mean the search crew and BFN as well as any supporters anywhere.

      It's still about Natalee for me, egos be damned no matter whose they are.  I'm here now basically for Beth, to be perfectly candid.  I don't really care what games they play with pictures anyway.  They gave months of their lives and I love them for that no matter what else they may do.


      jmoo

      They (the authorities) can still maintain the chain of evidence; their chain.  Perhaps they (those appearing to snub) are not realizing that.  Again, there are most likely reasons other than the "snub."  However some people do tend to be thinking themselves "special."  It is their whole life to be on the inside of a circle.  There are many circles, but one life.  These same people will suck the sap out of each other and move on and try to do the same thing in as many "circles" as they can until they are convinced they are the circle. What I am comparing this to is a street scene murder where there is a yellow tape, but still onlookers can see a lot, but not know the circumstances and cannot see as well as those inside the tape.  Yes, they are being over cautious for either lack of knowledge or maybe even   financial gain,   LOL   Jackb

      Just lets say:  Elvis has left the building.  LOL  Jack the snake


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: texasmom on March 03, 2008, 08:45:19 PM
      To clarify the thumb down issue:

      -It was agreed immediately before the 30-Dec dive that 2 thumbs up (by Tim Trahan) meant positive ID on Natalee from something conclusive.
      -One thumb up was to indicate human remains

      -There was no set signal pre-dive for anything but the above scenarios.
       
      By Tim's own admission, his observation of the inside of the trap (lasting a few seconds) was inconclusive. His signal indicated an inconclusive observation referring to the object said by some to be a skull, a hardened sponge by others...
      What you can't see is immediately before Tim approached the trap opening, a large skate stirred up sediment reducing visibility.
      The quick signal came because the dive time was nearly up .

      Thanks for the clarification, OE!  ::MonkeyCool::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: klaasend on March 03, 2008, 08:50:22 PM
      Kermit's pic:

      (http://img136.imageshack.us/img136/1057/skullnocolorur2.jpg)

      Jackb's adjustment/enhancement of Kermit's pic:

      (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/cid_000701c87d97d74339e09299a83fcom.jpg)



      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: private eye on March 03, 2008, 08:51:30 PM
      What I want to know Ocean Ex is did you see any sunken treasures?


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: jackb on March 03, 2008, 08:51:44 PM
      Underwater construction, discovering lost worlds, fortunes on shipwrecks, and or recovering victims. You'll be part of the generations that robs the oceans of her secrets, with a direct involvement and a front row seat:)

      Uh.....maybe not so PI.  jb


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: oceanexploration on March 03, 2008, 08:52:45 PM
      To clarify the thumb down issue:

      -It was agreed immediately before the 30-Dec dive that 2 thumbs up (by Tim Trahan) meant positive ID on Natalee from something conclusive.
      -One thumb up was to indicate human remains

      -There was no set signal pre-dive for anything but the above scenarios.
       
      By Tim's own admission, his observation of the inside of the trap (lasting a few seconds) was inconclusive. His signal indicated an inconclusive observation referring to the object said by some to be a skull, a hardened sponge by others...
      What you can't see is immediately before Tim approached the trap opening, a large skate stirred up sediment reducing visibility.
      The quick signal came because the dive time was nearly up .

      Ocean Ex, don't feel obligated to answer anything your even the least bit uncomfortable answering. I think eveyone just wants you to be able to relax, enjoy the group, offer what you can, with no expectations from us of you.

      I appreciate the offer, I accept.  I will not talk about what I shouldn't, let alone what I can't.  However, I believe what is already out in the open is better off made clear and accurate, rather than thrown out in the open and left for passionate people to decifer (based on 6 screen shots, a few comments by people who weren't present the entire time, and some fuzzy Dateline footage).   


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: oceanexploration on March 03, 2008, 08:54:08 PM
      Kermit's pic:

      (http://img136.imageshack.us/img136/1057/skullnocolorur2.jpg)

      Jackb's adjustment/enhancement of Kermit's pic:

      (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/cid_000701c87d97d74339e09299a83fcom.jpg)



      Yikes Klaas... That's really creepy.. ::MonkeyEek::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: private eye on March 03, 2008, 08:55:53 PM
      Underwater construction, discovering lost worlds, fortunes on shipwrecks, and or recovering victims. You'll be part of the generations that robs the oceans of her secrets, with a direct involvement and a front row seat:)

      Uh.....maybe not so PI.  jb

      How come?


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Observer on March 03, 2008, 08:56:11 PM
      What I want to know Ocean Ex is did you see any sunken treasures?

      Don't be holding out on us now OE! Answer the question!  ::MonkeyWink::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: private eye on March 03, 2008, 08:58:42 PM
      To clarify the thumb down issue:

      -It was agreed immediately before the 30-Dec dive that 2 thumbs up (by Tim Trahan) meant positive ID on Natalee from something conclusive.
      -One thumb up was to indicate human remains

      -There was no set signal pre-dive for anything but the above scenarios.
       
      By Tim's own admission, his observation of the inside of the trap (lasting a few seconds) was inconclusive. His signal indicated an inconclusive observation referring to the object said by some to be a skull, a hardened sponge by others...
      What you can't see is immediately before Tim approached the trap opening, a large skate stirred up sediment reducing visibility.
      The quick signal came because the dive time was nearly up .

      Ocean Ex, don't feel obligated to answer anything your even the least bit uncomfortable answering. I think everyone just wants you to be able to relax, enjoy the group, offer what you can, with no expectations from us of you.

      I appreciate the offer, I accept.  I will not talk about what I shouldn't, let alone what I can't.  However, I believe what is already out in the open is better off made clear and accurate, rather than thrown out in the open and left for passionate people to decifer (based on 6 screen shots, a few comments by people who weren't present the entire time, and some fuzzy Dateline footage).   

      This group attacks words like a school of hungry piranhas


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: jackb on March 03, 2008, 08:58:46 PM
      Kermit's pic:

      (http://img136.imageshack.us/img136/1057/skullnocolorur2.jpg)

      Jackb's adjustment/enhancement of Kermit's pic:

      (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/cid_000701c87d97d74339e09299a83fcom.jpg)


        This appears to be a top side (not direct view but behind the ear up and down (that I have here.)  You are looking down into the skull from the (person made) cavities on top.  Down in the left (your left) is the eye socket bone most likely.  There are other views here and there.  The darkened areas are where skull once was.     j/b


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: klaasend on March 03, 2008, 08:59:20 PM
      OE - we are used to creepy after a year of this.  You'ld be surprised the things we have actually uncovered simply by lightening up a dark photograph.  I'm not referring to the trap pictures, but others in the case.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: AZSunny on March 03, 2008, 09:00:19 PM
      What I want to know Ocean Ex is did you see any sunken treasures?

      Don't be holding out on us now OE! Answer the question!  ::MonkeyWink::

      I think perhaps he is waiting for your definition of hidden treasures.  Gold bullion?  Is so, where would that be exactly??  Just among friends of course.  ::MonkeyHaHa::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Ono on March 03, 2008, 09:00:38 PM
      Venezuela's Chavez May Have Given $300 Million to Colombia's Leftist Rebels, Police Say

      http://www.theledger.com/article/20080303/BREAKING/581926771

      Nuggets:

      “When they mention negotiations for 50 kilos of uranium this means that the FARC are taking big steps in the world of terrorism to become a global aggressor. We’re not talking of domestic guerrilla but transnational terrorism,” said Naranjo, without giving more details.


       ::MonkeyShocked::


      It's not looking good;  Wonder if Cindy Sheehan will visit her pal Hugo anytime soon.  She's been stirring the pot in Egypt lately. 

      Should we be stocking up on coffee?


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: caesu on March 03, 2008, 09:02:01 PM
      current affairs program NOVA is doing a series about The Antilles (and Aruba i suppose - some name them together)

      haven't watched it yet, but i will.

      http://www.novatv.nl/index.cfm?ln=nl&fuseaction=videoaudio.details&reportage_id=5853&CFID=38346573&CFTOKEN=55476033

      Quote
      SERIE: DE ANTILLEN, DEEL 1: DE DIENSTREIS

      Om de dag vertrekt er vanaf Schiphol een delegatie Haagse ambtenaren naar de Nederlandse Antillen: 180 keer per jaar. 
           
      De ambtenaren blijven daar gemiddeld een week. Ze geven er steun aan de ambtenaren ter plekke of nemen deel aan allerlei werkgroepen. Soms gaan ze alleen om zich aan de Antilliaanse collega' s voor te stellen.

      De Nederlandse delegaties komen van verschillende ministeries en de kans is groot dat ze elkaar onverwachts tegenkomen. De dienstreizen worden in Den Haag namelijk niet gecoördineerd. Dat blijkt uit onderzoek van NOVA.

      In de studio reageert staatssecretaris van Binnenlandse Zaken en Koninkrijksrelaties Ank Bijleveld.


      the first segment was about government/state delegations travelling every other day to the Antilles for al kinds of workgroups or support roles on the islands. or just to introduce themselves to their Antilles colleague.
      they stay on islands a week on average.

      these trips are not co-ordinated by The Hague. so it happend that those delegations unexpectedly bump into eachother.
      Ank Bijleveld, cabinet secretary for Kingdom affairs reacts in the studio.

      i don't know what the real issue is here but i suspect wasting money on easy holidays in the sun.
      but i go watch it this week and report back.

      maybe the other segments in this series will cover more interesting subjects.

      http://cgi.omroep.nl/cgi-bin/streams?/id/NPS/serie/NPS_1093696/NPS_1093849/bb.20080303.asf (windows media player)

      just watched this.
      mostly about dutch officials making a ridiculous amount of paid holiday trips to the antilles.
      islanders asking why the money wasn't spend on the island instead and why video-conferencing wasn't used.

      also about corruption on st. maarten.
      a dutch official was a whistle blower about a prison official who stole 200.000 euro (150.000 dollars?)
      in return the dutch official got send back to the netherlands by the prison director.

      cabinet secretary for kingdom affairs Ank Bijleveld, had a hard time explaining all this.

      "friday and saturday the remaining parts about corruption"


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: oceanexploration on March 03, 2008, 09:02:03 PM
      What I want to know Ocean Ex is did you see any sunken treasures?

      That would fall into the category: "Not telling". 

      We did come across about 8 obvious wrecks and a few others which may be ballast piles and/or wreck related debris, but I'm not certain.  We only dove on the Catamaran wreckage. Several wrecks were known as wrecks in the area, but their locations unknown.  The remaining are complete unknowns. In my opinion none will enable me to retire, not that I would.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: CapsLockWizard on March 03, 2008, 09:03:43 PM
      Hi all,

      Well it is not over till Natalee is send home.

      XTC DNA area may hold many mystery...
      The parked Hour Pendulum is now set in motion.
      Several Guillotine are being sharpen.
      when the Hour Pendulum reach 240 swing the auto Guillotine will fall.
      the foundation of babylon will be shake.

      To be continue...


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: klaasend on March 03, 2008, 09:04:47 PM
      OE - we are used to creepy after a year of this.  You'ld be surprised the things we have actually uncovered simply by lightening up a dark photograph.  I'm not referring to the trap pictures, but others in the case.

      Oceanexplorer - example:

      Here you see a dark photo, taken at night of Freddy Arambatzis and Satish Kalpoe:

      (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/fs.jpg)

      By simply brightening it up a bit we can see it's Freddy and Satish in JORAN's backyard by his pool:

      (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/fs2.jpg)


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: jackb on March 03, 2008, 09:05:07 PM
      Kermit's pic:

      (http://img136.imageshack.us/img136/1057/skullnocolorur2.jpg)

      Jackb's adjustment/enhancement of Kermit's pic:

      (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/cid_000701c87d97d74339e09299a83fcom.jpg)



      Keep in mind their computers are very powerful and the screens make images from them to our computers so close up as not to be as visible as we need.  That has to be compensated for.  Their objects are not possible to make out if they are not adjusted in such a way as to be able to see them.   jack blue


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: klaasend on March 03, 2008, 09:06:03 PM
      Hi all,

      Well it is not over till Natalee is send home.

      XTC DNA area may hold many mystery...
      The parked Hour Pendulum is now set in motion.
      Several Guillotine are being sharpen.
      when the Hour Pendulum reach 240 swing the auto Guillotine will fall.
      the foundation of babylon will be shake.

      To be continue...


      OK, good I think??


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Castaglance on March 03, 2008, 09:06:41 PM
      paraphrasing....

      just the highlights of Oceanexplorers posts

      Remember, the Dateline footage was taken over our shoulders by filming the ROV monitor.  The footage is not the recorded ROV footage.
      These 6 screen captures were sent to the FBI. (nothing else)
      I was shocked to see them posted.
      99.9% certainty
      Dave very reasonably requested them from me. 
      I badly wanted to send them to him, but couldn't.
      Recovered samples sent for forensic analysis.
      #1 ranked priority target
      hours of footage were of other dives on other targets.  None were of any relevance
      NO mention of what was in the 1st target what-so-ever, and rightly so...
      but, all that he doesn't say speaks volumes.
      Then he goes on to add:


      To clarify the thumb down issue:

      -One thumb up was to indicate human remains

      -There was no set signal pre-dive for anything but the above scenarios.
       
      By Tim's own admission, His signal indicated an inconclusive observation referring to the object said by some to be a skull, a hardened sponge by others...
      What you can't see is a large skate stirred up sediment reducing visibility.
      The quick signal came because the dive time was nearly up .
      And HE feels the need to justify this...

      Kyle, no questions here, just patience. (minor ability to read betwixt the lines) TY

      this being a newly posting monkey is hard work... I probably did this wrong as well

      p.s. Kyle_ I have a daughter named... Kyle


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: caesu on March 03, 2008, 09:06:48 PM
      Probably already posted but anyway:

      A response out of Aruba to this report:

       03 mrt 2008, 18.14  ' Aruba transit port of heroin '

      ORANJESTAD - Aruba is a transit port for heroin and to a lesser degree of cocaine. Drug use on the island, also under tourists, remains a point of care. Stands in a report which The international Narcotics Strategy Friday to the American congress in America to report (INSCR) have offered. The report over the year 2007 has been made Monday public.

      The drugs would further be transported as from the island by means of cruising ships which put on Aruba and the daily flights as from the island to America and Europe. According to the report Aruba is interesting for smugglers by the ' good infrastructure, excellent flight connections and relatively light punish for drug trafficking in relatively good circumstances '.

      The report communicates that Aruba has crime indeed little, but that becomes clear that from crime research in 2007, ' prominent on the island has established drug traffickers '.

       The Public Prosecution Service on Aruba "does not understand" on which the US base their conclusion concerning Aruba. According to head officier Hans mos there was previous year on the island one capture of thirteen kilos heroin. That is no large quantity. By remainder are talk of a decreasing recent development, in 2000, 78 kilos were intercepted there there. Both in heroin and in cocaine and ecstasy considerably less is acted by the stricter supervision, among which the hundred percent controls in the Netherlands.

      http://www.telegraaf.nl/binnenland/3457453/__Aruba_doorvoerhaven_van_herone___.html?p=1,1

      i hope this news gets much coverage.
      maybe in combination with above mentioned NOVA current affairs series about antilles/aruba.
      i find the us state department report quite shocking.
      although it also mentions steps being taken to stop the smuggling.

      http://www.state.gov/p/inl/rls/nrcrpt/2008/vol1/html/100778.htm (Dutch Caribbean paragraph)


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: oceanexploration on March 03, 2008, 09:07:42 PM
      What I want to know Ocean Ex is did you see any sunken treasures?

      Don't be holding out on us now OE! Answer the question!  ::MonkeyWink::

      I think perhaps he is waiting for your definition of hidden treasures.  Gold bullion?  Is so, where would that be exactly??  Just among friends of course.  ::MonkeyHaHa::

      Well, if I sent the sunken treasure information to the FBI it would be posted somewhere on the Internet already lol.   ::MonkeyNoNo::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Serenity on March 03, 2008, 09:08:03 PM

      Klass

      I'm appalled that the alleged photos of a skull are even on this site. Kyle has already told you there was NO human remains. It's time to stop with the nasty photos. I'm sure if Beth or Dave saw what SM was doing to try to disprove OE they would not be happy.l


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Observer on March 03, 2008, 09:08:21 PM
      Hi all,

      Well it is not over till Natalee is send home.

      XTC DNA area may hold many mystery...
      The parked Hour Pendulum is now set in motion.
      Several Guillotine are being sharpen.
      when the Hour Pendulum reach 240 swing the auto Guillotine will fall.
      the foundation of babylon will be shake.

      To be continue...


      Ok,We will have the cigars ready! Let those heads roll!!  ::MonkeyCool::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Rob on March 03, 2008, 09:08:21 PM
      What I want to know Ocean Ex is did you see any sunken treasures?

      That would fall into the category: "Not telling". 

      We did come across about 8 obvious wrecks and a few others which may be ballast piles and/or wreck related debris, but I'm not certain.  We only dove on the Catamaran wreckage. Several wrecks were known as wrecks in the area, but their locations unknown.  The remaining are complete unknowns. In my opinion none will enable me to retire, not that I would.

      any numbers that might ID this as the Lubouovic Family boat?


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: texasmom on March 03, 2008, 09:09:17 PM
      Probably already posted but anyway:

      A response out of Aruba to this report:

       03 mrt 2008, 18.14  ' Aruba transit port of heroin '

      ORANJESTAD - Aruba is a transit port for heroin and to a lesser degree of cocaine. Drug use on the island, also under tourists, remains a point of care. Stands in a report which The international Narcotics Strategy Friday to the American congress in America to report (INSCR) have offered. The report over the year 2007 has been made Monday public.

      The drugs would further be transported as from the island by means of cruising ships which put on Aruba and the daily flights as from the island to America and Europe. According to the report Aruba is interesting for smugglers by the ' good infrastructure, excellent flight connections and relatively light punish for drug trafficking in relatively good circumstances '.

      The report communicates that Aruba has crime indeed little, but that becomes clear that from crime research in 2007, ' prominent on the island has established drug traffickers '.

       The Public Prosecution Service on Aruba "does not understand" on which the US base their conclusion concerning Aruba. According to head officier Hans mos there was previous year on the island one capture of thirteen kilos heroin. That is no large quantity. By remainder are talk of a decreasing recent development, in 2000, 78 kilos were intercepted there there. Both in heroin and in cocaine and ecstasy considerably less is acted by the stricter supervision, among which the hundred percent controls in the Netherlands.

      http://www.telegraaf.nl/binnenland/3457453/__Aruba_doorvoerhaven_van_herone___.html?p=1,1

      Thanks, Klaas!

      Thirteen kilos, no large quantity!   ::MonkeyEek::
      That's a lot of freakin' heroin in my book...

      And if you consider what they didn't capture......or didn't CHOOSE to capture!   ::MonkeyRoll::



      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: private eye on March 03, 2008, 09:09:33 PM
      What I want to know Ocean Ex is did you see any sunken treasures?

      That would fall into the category: "Not telling". 

      We did come across about 8 obvious wrecks and a few others which may be ballast piles and/or wreck related debris, but I'm not certain.  We only dove on the Catamaran wreckage. Several wrecks were known as wrecks in the area, but their locations unknown.  The remaining are complete unknowns. In my opinion none will enable me to retire, not that I would.

      I think you are going to have a very reqarding career. I gather you don't get sea sick:)


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: klaasend on March 03, 2008, 09:13:37 PM

      Klass

      I'm appalled that the alleged photos of a skull are even on this site. Kyle has already told you there was NO human remains. It's time to stop with the nasty photos. I'm sure if Beth or Dave saw what SM was doing to try to disprove OE they would not be happy.l

      Serenity - we aren't trying to disprove OE.  I think Beth and Dave would be very disappointed in us if we didn't investigate and look at everything inside out.

      How can it be a nasty photo if it's nothing but coral or a rock?


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: private eye on March 03, 2008, 09:13:59 PM
      OE - we are used to creepy after a year of this.  You'ld be surprised the things we have actually uncovered simply by lightening up a dark photograph.  I'm not referring to the trap pictures, but others in the case.

      Oceanexplorer - example:

      Here you see a dark photo, taken at night of Freddy Arambatzis and Satish Kalpoe:

      (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/fs.jpg)

      By simply brightening it up a bit we can see it's Freddy and Satish in JORAN's backyard by his pool:

      (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/fs2.jpg)

      Thats a Kodak moment I wish I could have been at:)


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Serenity on March 03, 2008, 09:16:03 PM

      Kyle has already said that there were no human remains, and I believe him


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: AZSunny on March 03, 2008, 09:17:18 PM
      What I want to know Ocean Ex is did you see any sunken treasures?

      Don't be holding out on us now OE! Answer the question!  ::MonkeyWink::

      I think perhaps he is waiting for your definition of hidden treasures.  Gold bullion?  Is so, where would that be exactly??  Just among friends of course.  ::MonkeyHaHa::

      Well, if I sent the sunken treasure information to the FBI it would be posted somewhere on the Internet already lol.   ::MonkeyNoNo::

      Well, you are right about that!!! ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Bladerunner on March 03, 2008, 09:17:20 PM
      paraphrasing....

      just the highlights of Oceanexplorers posts

      Remember, the Dateline footage was taken over our shoulders by filming the ROV monitor.  The footage is not the recorded ROV footage.
      These 6 screen captures were sent to the FBI. (nothing else)
      I was shocked to see them posted.
      99.9% certainty
      Dave very reasonably requested them from me. 
      I badly wanted to send them to him, but couldn't.
      Recovered samples sent for forensic analysis.
      #1 ranked priority target
      hours of footage were of other dives on other targets.  None were of any relevance
      NO mention of what was in the 1st target what-so-ever, and rightly so...
      but, all that he doesn't say speaks volumes.
      Then he goes on to add:


      To clarify the thumb down issue:

      -One thumb up was to indicate human remains

      -There was no set signal pre-dive for anything but the above scenarios.
       
      By Tim's own admission, His signal indicated an inconclusive observation referring to the object said by some to be a skull, a hardened sponge by others...
      What you can't see is a large skate stirred up sediment reducing visibility.
      The quick signal came because the dive time was nearly up .
      And HE feels the need to justify this...

      Kyle, no questions here, just patience. (minor ability to read betwixt the lines) TY

      this being a newly posting monkey is hard work... I probably did this wrong as well

      p.s. Kyle_ I have a daughter named... Kyle


      hmmm... I wonder what signal was given when video #3 was recorded??     ::MonkeyEek::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: oceanexploration on March 03, 2008, 09:17:41 PM
      Klaas,

      Processing imagery is a wonderful science.  I spent a good deal of time during grad school working in an advanced remote sensing and spatial analysis lab working mainly with multi-band satelite imagery. If you want some good software to do some powerful analysis, check out Erdas Imagine.   


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: bluwaters on March 03, 2008, 09:18:01 PM
      Sorry for the long post, but this is very interesting. This was released today by the US Dept of State. Some have posted the link to this report in Dutch newspapers translated back to English. This is the original report. I have highlighted the sections most pertinent to Aruba, but the entire document is worth reading, IMHO.
      I believe that another monkey posted this link earlier today, but now I cannot find it.
      Klaas  Please feel free to edit if this is too big to place on the forum.      (http://i92.photobucket.com/albums/l28/TallyAnna/smilies/tsktsk.gif)
      US Department of State
      International Narcotics Control Strategy Report    -2008
      Released by the Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs
      March 2008

      The Caribbean
      http://www.state.gov/p/inl/rls/nrcrpt/2008/vol1/html/100778.htm

      Dutch Caribbean

      I. Summary

      Aruba, the Netherlands Antilles, and the Netherlands together form the Kingdom of the Netherlands.
      The two Caribbean parts of the Kingdom have autonomy over their internal affairs, with the right to exercise independent decision making in a number of counter narcotics areas. The Government of the Netherlands (GON) is responsible for the defense and foreign affairs of all three of the Kingdom and assists the Government of Aruba (GOA) and the Government of the Netherlands Antilles (GONA) in their efforts to combat narcotics trafficking. Negotiations are underway that are expected to result in the dissolution of the Netherlands Antilles in 2008, with Curacao and Sint Maarten to attain autonomous status similar to Aruba’s, while the islands of Bonaire and Saint Eustatius would become municipalities within the Kingdom of the Netherlands. Both Aruba and the Netherlands Antilles are active members of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) and Caribbean Financial Action Task Force (CFATF) and are subject to the 1988 UN Drug Convention as part of the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

      II. Status

      Netherlands Antilles. The islands of the Netherlands Antilles (NA) (Curacao and Bonaire off Venezuela and Saba, Saint Eustatius, and Sint Maarten east of the U.S. Virgin Islands) continue to serve as northbound transshipment points for cocaine and increasing amounts of heroin coming from South America; chiefly Colombia, Venezuela, and to a much lesser extent, Suriname. Go-fast boats are typically used to transport drugs to U.S. territory in the Caribbean, although the use of fishing boats, freighters, and cruise ships is becoming more common. Direct transport to Europe, and at times to the U.S., is sometimes carried-out by “mules” (drug couriers) using commercial flights. The DEA and local law enforcement saw continued go-fast boat traffic this year with some load sizes reduced because of a potential exposure to law enforcement. This shift was attributed to successful investigations along with investments by the Antilles in border security like the new ground-based radar system capable of identifying inbound vessels. These shipments were generally en route to Puerto Rico or the U.S. Virgin Islands, but Sint Maarten continued to hold some measurable popularity among couriers as a gateway to Europe. In addition to go-fast boat activity and smuggling via commercial airlines, large quantities of narcotics continued to be moved through in cargo containers.

      Sint Maarten’s geographic location and its multi-national population make it an ideal transshipment point between South America and the United States, for drugs and human smuggling. Dutch Sint Maarten is considered a “Free Zone”, which means there are limited controls placed on import and export of goods. This situation also applies to financial crimes. The absence of rigorous checks into monetary flows means that money laundering and proceeds from illegal activities are relatively easy to conceal. Sint Maarten announced draft legislation to be presented to Parliament in 2008 that would extend the requirement to report suspicious financial transactions to include not only banks and casinos but car dealers, jewelers, insurance companies, lawyers and accountants as well. In preparation for its expected autonomous status, Sint Maarten established a Crime Action Task Force to enhance law enforcement efforts against drug trafficking, human smuggling and money laundering.

      In Curacao, the crackdown at Curacao’s Hato International Airport on “mules”—who either ingest or conceal on their bodies illegal drugs — continued during 2007. Detentions of mules declined from a high of 80 to 100 per day, to approximately 10 per month in 2007, according to local court statistics. The decline can be directly attributed to aggressive law enforcement tactics employed by Antillean authorities, in conjunction with their Dutch partners, coupled with innovative legislative tactics like the confiscation of the passports of Antillean couriers.

      During 2007, the newly appointed Police Chief in conjunction with the Minister of Justice made a concentrated effort to improve Criminal Intelligence by creating a new Operational Intelligence Unit within the Curacao Police Corps. This specialized Intel Unit improved the investigative effectiveness of the police and successful joint Antillean/Dutch investigations conducted by the Hit and Run Money Laundering Team (HARM) have become commonplace during 2007.

      The specialized Dutch police units (RSTs) that support law enforcement in the NA continued to be effective in 2007. RST Curacao had its biggest success in a joint international money laundering operation named Operation Kings Cross, which focused on illegal activities within the Curacao Free Zone. This operation resulted in the seizure of $120,000 in Euros and $130,000 in U.S. Currency and the arrest of the principal target in the investigation. In another joint RST investigation named Operation Pick Pocket results included the seizure of 542 kilograms of cocaine, 10 kilograms of heroin, and the arrest of 61 individuals.

      The Netherlands Antilles and Aruba Coast Guard (CGNAA) was responsible for several seizures of cocaine, heroin, and marijuana during 2007. In October, the CGNAA, in coordination with the RST Curacao seized approximately 35 kilograms and a go-fast vessel. The CGNAA’s three cutters, outfitted with rigid-hull inflatable boats (RHIBs) and new ‘super’ RHIBs designed especially for counter narcotics work in the Caribbean, demonstrated their utility against go-fast boats and other targets.

      The CGNAA has developed an effective counternarcotics intelligence service and is considered by the U.S. Coast Guard and DEA to be an invaluable international law enforcement partner. Under the continued leadership of the Attorney General, the GONA continued to strengthen its cooperation with U.S. law enforcement authorities throughout 2007. This cooperation extended to Sint Maarten, where the United States and the GONA continued joint efforts against international organized crime and drug trafficking.

      The Dutch Navy also operates in the Netherlands Antilles under the auspices of Component Task Group 4.4 (CTG 4.4), which operates in international waters under the oversight of the Joint Inter Agency Task Force South (JIATF-S). Over the past two years, CTG 4.4 has become a close and essential ally of the DEA and other U.S. agencies. Their continual efforts to thwart drugs trafficking from the region have been noted at the highest levels of the DEA and U.S. government. Several notable seizures occurred during 2007. The most impressive effort was the tracking of a maritime vessel from Colombia, which culminated with the seizure of approximately 153 kilograms of heroin.

      The GONA demonstrated its commitment to the counternarcotics effort by continued support for a U.S. Forward Operating Location (FOL) at the Curacao Hato International Airport. Under a ten-year use agreement, signed in March 2000 and ratified in October 2001 by the Dutch Parliament, U.S. military aircraft conduct counternarcotics detection and monitoring flights over both the source and transit zones from commercial ramp space provided free of charge.

      Aruba. Aruba is a transshipment point for increasing quantities of heroin, and to a lesser extent cocaine that move north via cruise ships and the multiple daily flights to the U.S. and Europe. The island attracts drug traffickers because of its good infrastructure, excellent flight connections, and relatively light sentences for drug-related crimes served in prisons with relatively good living conditions.

      While Aruba enjoys a low crime rate, crime reporting during 2007 indicates that prominent drug traffickers are established on the island. Drug abuse in Aruba, including among tourists, remains a cause for concern. Cruise lines that visit Aruba have strict boarding/search policies for employees in order to thwart efforts of the traffickers to establish regular courier routes back to the United States. The expanding use of MDMA in clubs by young people attracts increasing attention. Private foundations on the island work on drug education and prevention and the Aruba government’s top counter narcotics official actively reaches out to U.S. sources for materials to use in prevention programs. The police also work in demand reduction programs among local schools and visit them regularly. The GOA has established an interagency commission to develop plans and programs to discourage youth from trafficking between the Netherlands and the U.S. The GOA has been very clear that it intends to pursue a dynamic counternarcotics strategy in close cooperation with its regional and international partners.

      In 2007, Aruba law enforcement officials continued to investigate and prosecute mid-level drug traffickers who supply drugs to “mules.” During 2007, there were several instances where Aruban authorities cooperated with U.S. authorities to carry out U.S. prosecutions of American citizens arrested in Aruba who were attempting to carry multi-kilogram quantities of drugs to the United States. Aruba also devotes substantial time and effort to the identification of the person’s responsible for the importation of drugs to Aruba.

      The GOA hosts the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) Bureau of Customs and Border Protection (CBP) pre-inspection and pre-clearance personnel at Reina Beatrix airport. These officers occupy facilities financed and built by the GOA. DHS seizures of cocaine and heroin were frequent in 2007. Aruba officials regularly explore ways to capitalize on the presence of the FOL and pre-clearance personnel, seeking to use resident U.S. law enforcement expertise to improve local law enforcement capabilities. In September, CBP’s Office of International Affairs and Trade Relations provided training on the implementation of border enforcement best practices and the proper use of inspection tool kits in the examination of aircraft, containers, vehicles and cargo.

      III. Actions Against Drugs in 2007


      Accomplishments. Available drug seizure statistics for calendar year 2007, as of October 31, 2007, were: Aruba seized 390 kilograms of cocaine and 13 kilograms of heroin. The Netherlands Antilles seized 638 kilograms of cocaine and 10 kilograms of heroin.

      Corruption. As a matter of policy, the NA does not encourage or facilitate the illicit production or distribution of narcotic or psychotropic drugs or other controlled substances, or the laundering of proceeds from illegal drug transactions. During 2007, the NA continued an aggressive and successful program to identify certain links from prominent traffickers in the region to law enforcement officials, which prompted additional investigation in the region. The NA has been quick to address these issues through criminal investigations, internal investigations, new hiring practices, and continued monitoring of law enforcement officials that hold sensitive positions. Aruba’s judiciary enjoys a well-deserved reputation for integrity. It has close ties with the Dutch legal system, including extensive seconding of Dutch prosecutors and judges to fill positions for which there are no qualified candidates among the small Antillean and Aruban populations.

      Agreements and Treaties. The Netherlands extended the 1988 UN Drug Convention to the NA and Aruba in March 1999, with the reservation that its obligations under certain provisions would only be applicable in so far as they were in accordance with NA and Aruba criminal legislation and policy on criminal matters. The NA and Aruba subsequently enacted revised, uniform legislation to resolve a lack of uniformity between the asset forfeiture laws of the NA and Aruba. The obligations of the Netherlands as a party to the 1961 UN Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, as amended by the 1972 Protocol, the Inter-American Convention against Corruption, and the UN Convention against Transnational Organized Crime and its three protocols apply to the NA and Aruba. The obligations of the Netherlands under the 1971 UN Convention on Psychotropic Substances have applied to the NA since March 10, 1999. The Netherlands’s Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty (MLAT) with the United States applies to the NA and Aruba. Both Aruba and the NA routinely honor requests made under the MLAT and cooperate extensively with the United States on law enforcement matters at less formal levels.

      Cultivation/Production. Cultivation and production of illicit drugs are not issues.

      Domestic Programs (Demand Reduction). Both the NA and Aruba have ongoing demand reduction programs, but need additional resources. In 2007, the Curacao Police Corps, in conjunction with Drug Abuse Resistance Education program (D.A.R.E.), opened a new D.A.R.E. facility in Willemstad, Curacao to aid in youth Demand Reduction activities.

      IV. U.S. Policy Initiatives and Programs

      The United States encourages Aruba and NA law enforcement officials to participate in INL-funded regional training courses provided by U.S. agencies at the GOA and GONA’s expense. Chiefly through the DEA and DHS/Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the United States is able to provide assistance to enhance technical capabilities as well as some targeted training. The U.S. continues to search for ways in which locally assigned U.S. law enforcement personnel can share their expertise with host country counterparts.

      Appreciation of the importance of intelligence to effective law enforcement has grown in the Dutch Caribbean. The USG is expanding intelligence sharing with GOA and GONA officials as they realize the mutual benefits that result from such sharing. As U.S.-provided intelligence must meet the strict requirements of local law, sharing of intelligence and law enforcement information requires ongoing, extensive liaison work to bridge the difference between U.S. and Dutch-based law.

      Road Ahead. Drug trafficking and related money laundering and criminal violence continue to threaten the Dutch Caribbean. The expansion of law enforcement cooperation between the U.S., Dutch, and Aruba and Netherlands Antilles will serve to protect the Dutch Caribbean from these threats and contribute to broader counternarcotics efforts in the Caribbean as well.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Observer on March 03, 2008, 09:18:34 PM
      What I want to know Ocean Ex is did you see any sunken treasures?

      Don't be holding out on us now OE! Answer the question!  ::MonkeyWink::

      I think perhaps he is waiting for your definition of hidden treasures.  Gold bullion?  Is so, where would that be exactly??  Just among friends of course.  ::MonkeyHaHa::

      Well, if I sent the sunken treasure information to the FBI it would be posted somewhere on the Internet already lol.   ::MonkeyNoNo::

      That wasn't the FBI that posted them on the internet  :wink: Fascinating stuff OE but that part of the ocean probably holds more cocaine then gold bullion..


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: private eye on March 03, 2008, 09:18:40 PM
      What I want to know Ocean Ex is did you see any sunken treasures?

      Don't be holding out on us now OE! Answer the question!  ::MonkeyWink::

      I think perhaps he is waiting for your definition of hidden treasures.  Gold bullion?  Is so, where would that be exactly??  Just among friends of course.  ::MonkeyHaHa::

      Well, if I sent the sunken treasure information to the FBI it would be posted somewhere on the Internet already lol.   ::MonkeyNoNo::

      I'll bet that was a shock


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: klaasend on March 03, 2008, 09:19:51 PM
      Klaas,

      Processing imagery is a wonderful science.  I spent a good deal of time during grad school working in an advanced remote sensing and spatial analysis lab working mainly with multi-band satelite imagery. If you want some good software to do some powerful analysis, check out Erdas Imagine.   

      Thanks Kyle, I will check out Erdas Imagine!


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Tamikosmom on March 03, 2008, 09:21:16 PM
      If Natalee's remains were recovered from the trap/cage ... why are Tim Miller, Dave Holloway, Beth Holloway, Tim Trahan and ... the Aruban Prosecutor's Office denying the find?

      Tim Miller
      Dateline Program
      February 22, 2008


      Slowly the divers worked their way down to the trap. They had been instructed to give a thumbs up or thumbs down.  The atmosphere in the survey room was tense, and nerves were raw as Miller, the Aruban authorities and the crew of the Persistence waited for word of what exactly was in the trap. The divers approached the target and signaled above. And then...

      (On the boat) No it's thumbs down. Negative, not it.

      Crushing disappointment.

      (On the boat) Tim Miller: Divers coming up right now. I don't know it looked as promising today as it did last night or before.

      Miller: Nothing?

      Trahan: No.

      Chris Hansen: That had to be a crushing blow.

      Tim Miller: It was a crushing blow.

      http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23301056/page/5/


      Tim Miller/Tim Trahan
      Dateline
      February 22, 2008


      (On the boat) Tim Miller: Divers coming up right now. I don't know it looked as promising today as it did last night or before.

      Miller: Nothing?

      Trahan: No.

      Chris Hansen: That had to be a crushing blow.

      Tim Miller: It was a crushing blow.

      http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23301056/page/5/


      Tim Miller/Dave Holloway/Beth Holloway
      Dateline
      February 22, 2008


      Chris Hansen: How hard is it for you to dial their numbers and tell them that this in fact is not the break in the case we-- we hoped for?

      Tim Miller: Probably one of the hardest calls I ever made. Probably one of the hardest … probably should have never made the first one. But everything looked right at the time.

      Natalee’s father was at home in Mississippi when the call came.

      Chris Hansen: What was it like for you to, once again, have a setback?

      Dave Holloway: That's probably about the time that-- the chest pains intensified to an extreme. I mean, how many times can I take this?

      Beth Holloway: You know, it's a disappointment. But, you have to look at the magnitude and the sacrifices being made even to get to that point.

      Chris Hansen: You didn't know these folks before this happened. What do they represent to you now?
       
      Dave Holloway: They represent heroes to me.
       
      To be sure there was no relevant evidence, material from the trap was given to the FBI.
       
      http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23301056/page/5/


      Postbus 1163, Oranjestad, Aruba
      Havenstraat 2
      Oranjestad
      Aruba

      To All media
      From The Public Prosecutor’s Office
      Date February 26, 2008

      Pages 1


      The Aruban Police requested the FBI Laboratory to process the cloth, because the Laboratory already had a sample of the exact match of the type of material of Natalee Holloway’s blouse. The FBI Laboratory received that material on the 22nd of January 2008.

      On the 25th of February 2008, the Prosecutors’ Office received the official report from the FBI Laboratory that showed that the two materials were not a match.


      Statement from the Prosecutor's Office
      Birmingham News
      February 26, 2008


      Fabric found in a crab trap off the Aruban coast doesn't match a blouse worn by Natalee Holloway when she disappeared, officials said today.

      The fabric was recovered by a dive crew last month and tested by the FBI, which was holding fabric samples matching Holloway's top, according to a release from the Aruban prosecutor's office.

      http://blog.al.com/spotnews/2008/02/fabric_found_in_aruban_crab_tr.html


      Statement from the Prosecutor's Office
      Associated Press
      February 26, 2008


      ORANJESTAD, Aruba  —  An FBI analysis of fabric collected from a crab trap off Aruba showed the material did not match clothing worn by missing American Natalee Holloway, prosecutors said Tuesday.

      The fabric was recovered in January by divers in about 90 feet of water as they searched for the body of the missing woman, the Aruban public prosecutor's office said in a statement.

      The FBI compared the material to a blouse worn by Holloway, who was 18 when she disappeared on the final night of a high school graduation trip to the Dutch Caribbean island in May 2005. The results "showed that the two materials were not a match," the statement said.

      Special Agent Ann Todd, a spokeswoman for the FBI Laboratory in Quantico, Va., said the lab could not comment on the case.

      http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,332848,00.html


      Tim Miller
      On the Record w/ Greta
      February 27, 2008


      Greta: Tim are they absolutely certain that this is not a piece of clothing belonging to Natalee Holloway?

      Tim: The report we got is the DNA that came back did not match Natalee's DNA ...

      Unofficial Transcript - Heli (RU)


      ++++++++++++++++


      If Natalee's remains were recovered from the crab/trap ... why  was the search of targets still planned as of February 28, 2008?

      Tim Trahan
      ABC - Eyewitness News
      February 28, 2008


      "And we all feel, I'm speaking from everybody on the team, that she's in one of the targets we have not looked at yet," Tim Trahan of Underwater Expeditions said. "We can't stop. I go to sleep at night thinking we've located it, we just need to get to it."

      http://abclocal.go.com/ktrk/story?section=news/local&id=5988951


      Tim Trahan
      ABC - Eyewitness News
      February 28, 2008


      "By Friday, we will have surveyed the entire 50-square mile off Aruba," Schafer said. "We have identified at least 60 of the targets. we have about 150 more targets to inspect."

      <snipped>

      "So we have completely mapped the ocean floor, we know every object that's there, we know every object that could be a container holding her in the sea," he said.

      http://abclocal.go.com/ktrk/story?section=news/local&id=5988951


      Hans Mos
      Dutch Television
      February 28, 2008


      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jxrrK53GOOA

      Quote from: JE on February 28, 2008, 07:47:39 AM
      He talks about the persistence search says they they re looking for a needle in a haystack. He says its a difficult search assuming the needle and haystack even exist.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: oceanexploration on March 03, 2008, 09:21:17 PM

      Kyle has already said that there were no human remains, and I believe him

      If you quote me, please include the quote for accuracy.  I never said there were no human remains.  I woudn't comment to that effect.  I have neither confirmed nor denied the issue.  The only comment I said was quoting Tim Trahan.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Observer on March 03, 2008, 09:21:28 PM
      What I want to know Ocean Ex is did you see any sunken treasures?

      That would fall into the category: "Not telling". 

      We did come across about 8 obvious wrecks and a few others which may be ballast piles and/or wreck related debris, but I'm not certain.  We only dove on the Catamaran wreckage. Several wrecks were known as wrecks in the area, but their locations unknown.  The remaining are complete unknowns. In my opinion none will enable me to retire, not that I would.

      I think you are going to have a very reqarding career. I gather you don't get sea sick:)

      After his targets hopefully find Natalee it will be exciting to see what he does next. The lost city of Atlantis would be a nice find  ::MonkeyWink::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Tater on March 03, 2008, 09:22:02 PM
      Hi all,

      Well it is not over till Natalee is send home.

      XTC DNA area may hold many mystery...
      The parked Hour Pendulum is now set in motion.
      Several Guillotine are being sharpen.
      when the Hour Pendulum reach 240 swing the auto Guillotine will fall.
      the foundation of babylon will be shake.

      To be continue...


      Ok,We will have the cigars ready! Let those heads roll!!  ::MonkeyCool::


      What does this mean?


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: private eye on March 03, 2008, 09:22:04 PM
      I've got to do my taxes, I'll be lurking though. Thanks Kyle for everything. Beth and Natalee mean a lot to me and I appreciate you doing what I certainly couldn't do for them. Hope to see you here a lot.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Castaglance on March 03, 2008, 09:22:20 PM

      Kyle has already said that there were no human remains, and I believe him

      I get this...
      Several hours of footage were of other dives on other targets.  None were of any relevance. Most targets were of peculiar coral pinnacles, man-made debris, and ship wrecks.
      Where is the no human remains?


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Bladerunner on March 03, 2008, 09:22:57 PM
      Probably already posted but anyway:

      A response out of Aruba to this report:

       03 mrt 2008, 18.14  ' Aruba transit port of heroin '

      ORANJESTAD - Aruba is a transit port for heroin and to a lesser degree of cocaine. Drug use on the island, also under tourists, remains a point of care. Stands in a report which The international Narcotics Strategy Friday to the American congress in America to report (INSCR) have offered. The report over the year 2007 has been made Monday public.

      The drugs would further be transported as from the island by means of cruising ships which put on Aruba and the daily flights as from the island to America and Europe. According to the report Aruba is interesting for smugglers by the ' good infrastructure, excellent flight connections and relatively light punish for drug trafficking in relatively good circumstances '.

      The report communicates that Aruba has crime indeed little, but that becomes clear that from crime research in 2007, ' prominent on the island has established drug traffickers '.

       The Public Prosecution Service on Aruba "does not understand" on which the US base their conclusion concerning Aruba. According to head officier Hans mos there was previous year on the island one capture of thirteen kilos heroin. That is no large quantity. By remainder are talk of a decreasing recent development, in 2000, 78 kilos were intercepted there there. Both in heroin and in cocaine and ecstasy considerably less is acted by the stricter supervision, among which the hundred percent controls in the Netherlands.

      http://www.telegraaf.nl/binnenland/3457453/__Aruba_doorvoerhaven_van_herone___.html?p=1,1

      Thanks, Klaas!

      Thirteen kilos, no large quantity!   ::MonkeyEek::
      That's a lot of freakin' heroin in my book...

      And if you consider what they didn't capture......or didn't CHOOSE to capture!   ::MonkeyRoll::



      Yeah what a typical bush league response from Hans Most. These people are truely idiots. "Does not understand" sounds like a pretty good tag line for their new branding strategy.

      A  R  U  B  A

      Does Not Understand!


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Observer on March 03, 2008, 09:23:29 PM

      Kyle has already said that there were no human remains, and I believe him

      If you quote me, please include the quote for accuracy.  I never said there were no human remains.  I woudn't comment to that effect.  I have neither confirmed nor denied the issue.  The only comment I said was quoting Tim Trahan.

      We know that OE..But rest assured if you make a comment it will be in Tamikosmoms database  ::MonkeyHaHa::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: texasmom on March 03, 2008, 09:23:50 PM
      Hi all,

      Well it is not over till Natalee is send home.

      XTC DNA area may hold many mystery...
      The parked Hour Pendulum is now set in motion.
      Several Guillotine are being sharpen.
      when the Hour Pendulum reach 240 swing the auto Guillotine will fall.
      the foundation of babylon will be shake.

      To be continue...


      Hi Caps!   :smt006

      Thanks for the update!   ::MonkeyCool::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Castaglance on March 03, 2008, 09:26:27 PM

      Kyle has already said that there were no human remains, and I believe him

      If you quote me, please include the quote for accuracy.  I never said there were no human remains.  I woudn't comment to that effect.  I have neither confirmed nor denied the issue.  The only comment I said was quoting Tim Trahan.
      thanks Kyle for the verification...I am so glad I am blonde by choice


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: oceanexploration on March 03, 2008, 09:27:19 PM
      Private Eye... I do not get sea sick, thank the good Lord.

      I'm glad you understand my shock in seeing the pics posted on the Internet.

      Good night all, signing off.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Observer on March 03, 2008, 09:27:29 PM
      Hi all,

      Well it is not over till Natalee is send home.

      XTC DNA area may hold many mystery...
      The parked Hour Pendulum is now set in motion.
      Several Guillotine are being sharpen.
      when the Hour Pendulum reach 240 swing the auto Guillotine will fall.
      the foundation of babylon will be shake.

      To be continue...


      Ok,We will have the cigars ready! Let those heads roll!!  ::MonkeyCool::


      What does this mean?

      It means that Caps thinks the Babylon is starting to fall. Meaning the cover up and the corrupt officials.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: caesu on March 03, 2008, 09:28:12 PM

      Thanks GMBW and a belated welcome to the board. One thing that has been persistently missing in the Dutch media is the corruption angle in Aruba. It's so damn obvious. I wish they would jump on that more. I hope this is something Peter is working on behind the scenes.

      I think he's trying very hard to do so...he did it in his first special when the angle of  'the friend of the family' opening the door at the Van der Sloots house when the housesearch was going to happen was very important in the show...and with the cellphone - prison thing in his latest special.
      He has said  that he's got 'his own ideas' about Paul van der Sloot (and we all know what that means ;-)...). But he won't say it out loud if he doesn't have stuff to back it up. In his position credibility means just about everything & because of that he can't say things without proof. But he is aware of Paul van der Sloot & his buddies helping out Joran and ???; the rest of the media seem to have focused on Joran.

      Maybe it's also because the media can't really bring it up since it's mostly news / talkshows that bring the case. News: you need prove / Talkshow: not too much detail & difficulty concerning the subject...10 / 15 minutes max. for an item.
      Newspapers should have picked it up though; it's weird they haven't really done that.


      You know Peter much better than we do being in Holland, but we have heard that he not only investigates murders with vigor but like to bust the occasional corrupt politician as well. Is this true?

      he did so many cases.
      http://www.peterrdevries.nl/tekst/dossierindextot.htm

      about corrupt officials, right out of my head:

      1. exposed a public prosecutor (Tonino) with child porn on his computer. Tonino put his computer with the garbage, that's how peter r. got hold of the computer. the public prosecutor got suspended.

      2. exposed the upcoming reserve queen (mabel wisse smit) as having a relationship with dutch biggest gangster Klaas Bruinsma in the 80s. mabel wisse smit lied about this to the prime minister Balkenende. prince johan-friso (son of queen beatrix) lost his right to the dutch throne because of this.

      3. exposed dutch secret service (AIVD) trying to frame the later assassinated pim fortuyn as if he had sex with underage drugs addicted moroccan boys.
      (pim fortuyn got assassinated a week before the elections as he was leading the polls)

      4. exposed dutch board of procureurs generaal violating parking rules right outside the dutch OM headoffice.

      5. exposed officials of the dutch police national headquarters violating parking rules outside the hq's.
      head of police promised change. year later the violating was still going on.

      6. exposed a police officer (possible drugging and) changing the will (testament) of multiple old, dying people so he inherited their money / real estate.

      i am sure i forgot something.

      most of these involved hidden camera.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: private eye on March 03, 2008, 09:28:35 PM

      Kyle has already said that there were no human remains, and I believe him

      If you quote me, please include the quote for accuracy.  I never said there were no human remains.  I woudn't comment to that effect.  I have neither confirmed nor denied the issue.  The only comment I said was quoting Tim Trahan.

      We know that OE..But rest assured if you make a comment it will be in Tamikosmoms database  ::MonkeyHaHa::

      Before I leave I have 3 suggestions for Kyle. Don't let them pin you down and don't take any crap:)


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: bluwaters on March 03, 2008, 09:28:41 PM

      Ocean Ex, don't feel obligated to answer anything your even the least bit uncomfortable answering. I think eveyone just wants you to be able to relax, enjoy the group, offer what you can, with no expectations from us of you.

      I appreciate the offer, I accept.  I will not talk about what I shouldn't, let alone what I can't.  However, I believe what is already out in the open is better off made clear and accurate, rather than thrown out in the open and left for passionate people to decifer (based on 6 screen shots, a few comments by people who weren't present the entire time, and some fuzzy Dateline footage).   
      *clears throat*
      Well, OE, what do you expect from a bunch of monkeys?
      This monkey is feels honored that you come here and post with us.
      Of course you know what this means -



      now you're a monkey too!
      ::MonkeyDance::
      (http://i92.photobucket.com/albums/l28/TallyAnna/smilies/celebrate.gif)


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: private eye on March 03, 2008, 09:29:50 PM
      I'm getting old, I forgot the 3rd:) Oh yea, remind them of our promise:)


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Castaglance on March 03, 2008, 09:32:30 PM
      I'm getting old, I forgot the 3rd:) Oh yea, remind them of our promise:)
      old?  when this started I was here before the crash... I read for hours on end.. now I need reading glasses


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: texasmom on March 03, 2008, 09:34:50 PM

      Thanks GMBW and a belated welcome to the board. One thing that has been persistently missing in the Dutch media is the corruption angle in Aruba. It's so damn obvious. I wish they would jump on that more. I hope this is something Peter is working on behind the scenes.

      I think he's trying very hard to do so...he did it in his first special when the angle of  'the friend of the family' opening the door at the Van der Sloots house when the housesearch was going to happen was very important in the show...and with the cellphone - prison thing in his latest special.
      He has said  that he's got 'his own ideas' about Paul van der Sloot (and we all know what that means ;-)...). But he won't say it out loud if he doesn't have stuff to back it up. In his position credibility means just about everything & because of that he can't say things without proof. But he is aware of Paul van der Sloot & his buddies helping out Joran and ???; the rest of the media seem to have focused on Joran.

      Maybe it's also because the media can't really bring it up since it's mostly news / talkshows that bring the case. News: you need prove / Talkshow: not too much detail & difficulty concerning the subject...10 / 15 minutes max. for an item.
      Newspapers should have picked it up though; it's weird they haven't really done that.


      You know Peter much better than we do being in Holland, but we have heard that he not only investigates murders with vigor but like to bust the occasional corrupt politician as well. Is this true?

      he did so many cases.
      http://www.peterrdevries.nl/tekst/dossierindextot.htm

      about corrupt officials, right out of my head:

      1. exposed a public prosecutor (Tonino) with child porn on his computer. Tonino put his computer with the garbage, that's how peter r. got hold of the computer. the public prosecutor got suspended.

      2. exposed the upcoming reserve queen (mabel wisse smit) as having a relationship with dutch biggest gangster Klaas Bruinsma in the 80s. mabel wisse smit lied about this to the prime minister Balkenende. prince johan-friso (son of queen beatrix) lost his right to the dutch throne because of this.

      3. exposed dutch secret service (AIVD) trying to frame the later assassinated pim fortuyn as if he had sex with underage drugs addicted moroccan boys.
      (pim fortuyn got assassinated a week before the elections as he was leading the polls)

      4. exposed dutch board of procureurs generaal violating parking rules right outside the dutch OM headoffice.

      5. exposed officials of the dutch police national headquarters violating parking rules outside the hq's.
      head of police promised change. year later the violating was still going on.

      6. exposed a police officer (possible drugging and) changing the will (testament) of multiple old, dying people so he inherited their money / real estate.

      i am sure i forgot something.

      most of these involved hidden camera.

      Ribbit, sorry about the quote stack Kermit, but

      I think I love this man......this Peter R. Devries.., ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Serenity on March 03, 2008, 09:35:45 PM
      Thank you Kyle


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: klaasend on March 03, 2008, 09:36:24 PM
      Posted by MF at RU:

      Beth Reynolds, de moeder van de verdwenen Amerikaanse tiener Natalee Holloway, is dinsdag te gast in de talkshow van Robert Jensen. Dat heeft RTL maandag bekendgemaakt. Ze doet voor het eerst haar verhaal op de Nederlandse televisie na de uitzending van misdaadverslaggever Peter R. de Vries vorige maand over de verdwijningszaak.

      In die uitzending waren met een verborgen camera opgenomen beelden te zien waarin verdachte Joran van der Sloot bekent te weten waar Holloway is gebleven. Ze zou onwel zijn geworden tijdens een vrijpartij, waarna Van der Sloot een vriend zou hebben gebeld die hem hielp Natalee te dumpen in zee.

      Reynolds was al eerder te gast bij Jensen. In september vertelde ze voor het eerst in een Nederlandse talkshow over de verdwijning van haar dochter.



      Through google translator:

      Beth Reynolds, the mother of missing American teenager Natalee Holloway, Tuesday is a guest in the talk by Robert Jensen. That has RTL Monday. She does for the first time her story on the Dutch television after the broadcast of crime reporter Peter R. De Vries last month on the verdwijningszaak.

      In the broadcast with a hidden camera recorded images to see where suspect Joran van der Sloot known to know where Holloway stayed. She would have become unwell during a vrijpartij, after which Van der Sloot would have called a friend who helped him Natalee to dump at sea.

      Reynolds was previously the guest of Jensen. In September she told for the first time in a Dutch talk about the disappearance of her daughter.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Observer on March 03, 2008, 09:36:27 PM
      I'm getting old, I forgot the 3rd:) Oh yea, remind them of our promise:)
      LOL! Night old man! j/k It's a Monday and you have no edit button  ::MonkeyWink::

      You too OE..It will be a great story some day when you tell your daughter how she got her name.. ::MonkeyCool::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Destiny on March 03, 2008, 09:38:26 PM
      Kermit's pic:

      (http://img136.imageshack.us/img136/1057/skullnocolorur2.jpg)

      Jackb's adjustment/enhancement of Kermit's pic:

      (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/cid_000701c87d97d74339e09299a83fcom.jpg)


        This appears to be a top side (not direct view but behind the ear up and down (that I have here.)  You are looking down into the skull from the (person made) cavities on top.  Down in the left (your left) is the eye socket bone most likely.  There are other views here and there.  The darkened areas are where skull once was.     j/b

      Yep...extreme head trauma...*she hit her head*...guess a lot of people from those parts hit their heads....could be anyone whacked on the head with a big rock...


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Tamikosmom on March 03, 2008, 09:40:39 PM

      Kyle has already said that there were no human remains, and I believe him

      If you quote me, please include the quote for accuracy.  I never said there were no human remains.  I woudn't comment to that effect.  I have neither confirmed nor denied the issue.  The only comment I said was quoting Tim Trahan.

      We know that OE..But rest assured if you make a comment it will be in Tamikosmoms database  ::MonkeyHaHa::

      You bet!!

       ::MonkeyHaHa::

      Lively Case Discussion #647 6/25 - 6/26/2007
      « Reply #10 on: June 25, 2007, 08:32:08 PM »
      JANET IS A CHEATER  

      Janet

      ++++++++++++

      Hey ... where is Robots?  It has been a while.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Kermit on March 03, 2008, 09:41:00 PM
      (http://img136.imageshack.us/img136/1057/skullnocolorur2.jpg)

      Same object that appears to be a skull with color removed and flipped the pic around



      This reminds me of the book by Iris Johansen called Face of Deception..Creepy indeed..

      I too think it is a skull.  If it is in fact a skull and DNA proves it not to be Natalee, I hope they let one of those talented people recreate the face.  There is a woman in the US who is particularly excellent at this skill and has worked with many in law enforcement on especially difficult and mysterious cases, but her name escapes me at the moment.

      How weird that that subject is what this book is about...Very scarey read..

      That might be her - not sure.  The woman I was referring to has worked with John Walsh on several high profile cases.  One that comes to mind is the one in south Florida where a hiker stumbled upon eight (I think) skeletal remains.  She recreated all their faces and was so accurate they were almost all immediately identified by their families.  The reconstructions side by side by the persons photographs were remarkable.  Absolutely amazing.

      Kermit and friends:  Just sent Klass a more visable version of what you posted.  Naner, naner, nanter (as the lady said,)  you will see something most of the other people on the other blogs have not.  What you will be seeing is a top and side view where you are looking down into the skull.  It appears the eye socket holder is in the (my)  left lower corner of the pic I sent.  It is your picture I messed with this time Kermit, the one you posted.
      Just made it a bit more visable.  If Klass will send it it is in her e-mail.  LOL
       blue the strange. 

      Good job jack.
      Sure looks like a skull to me.



      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: CapsLockWizard on March 03, 2008, 09:41:29 PM
      Hi all,

      Well it is not over till Natalee is send home.

      XTC DNA area may hold many mystery...
      The parked Hour Pendulum is now set in motion.
      Several Guillotine are being sharpen.
      when the Hour Pendulum reach 240 swing the auto Guillotine will fall.
      the foundation of babylon will be shake.

      To be continue...


      Ok,We will have the cigars ready! Let those heads roll!!  ::MonkeyCool::


      What does this mean?

      It means that Caps thinks the Babylon is starting to fall. Meaning the cover up and the corrupt officials.
      Will be in the new.

      He was arrested in the USA Aruba Government (big time MEP Supported) for oney laundering and falsification...


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Kermit on March 03, 2008, 09:42:37 PM
      Heh Heh
      ribbit Miss Texasmom



      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Castaglance on March 03, 2008, 09:43:00 PM
      Private Eye... I do not get sea sick, thank the good Lord.

      I'm glad you understand my shock in seeing the pics posted on the Internet.

      Good night all, signing off.

      klaas...is this a random middle thought or what, hmmmm


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: CapsLockWizard on March 03, 2008, 09:44:33 PM
      *** 5,000000.00 **** LABORATORY (RC, WEVER) washing machine

      LOL

       ::MonkeyCool::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Kermit on March 03, 2008, 09:45:38 PM
      (http://img136.imageshack.us/img136/1057/skullnocolorur2.jpg)

      Same object that appears to be a skull with color removed and flipped the pic around



      Kermit, I am one who believes that is a skull.  You are creeping me out with those enhancements.  I see eyes and mouth.  It is spooky. ::MonkeyEek::

      I agree Blue Moon of KY

      It's almost like you can see a face on that. And alls I did was remove the color and turn the picture.



      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Observer on March 03, 2008, 09:46:11 PM
      Hi all,

      Well it is not over till Natalee is send home.

      XTC DNA area may hold many mystery...
      The parked Hour Pendulum is now set in motion.
      Several Guillotine are being sharpen.
      when the Hour Pendulum reach 240 swing the auto Guillotine will fall.
      the foundation of babylon will be shake.

      To be continue...


      Ok,We will have the cigars ready! Let those heads roll!!  ::MonkeyCool::


      What does this mean?

      It means that Caps thinks the Babylon is starting to fall. Meaning the cover up and the corrupt officials.
      Will be in the new.

      He was arrested in the USA Aruba Government (big time MEP Supported) for oney laundering and falsification...


      Same age as Paul Van Der Sloot I see..I wonder who exactly he was connected to?


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Kermit on March 03, 2008, 09:47:24 PM

      According to Dave and Art Wood thats how he acted in June 2005. We know he showed up with Dennis Jacobs on his day off flashing his gun around,they took at as a obvious sign to back off from the Van Der Sloots.

      Maybe Paulus is the big drug dealer and he hides behind his son Lorenzo

      Maybe Paulus helps move money that comes into the casinos for Columbia and Venezuela.
      Set's up offshore accounts.
      And has a fetish for young girls
      Maybe Joran is covering up for "your own father!"


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Kermit on March 03, 2008, 09:48:40 PM

      Kyle has already said that there were no human remains, and I believe him

      If you quote me, please include the quote for accuracy.  I never said there were no human remains.  I woudn't comment to that effect.  I have neither confirmed nor denied the issue.  The only comment I said was quoting Tim Trahan.
      thanks Kyle for the verification...I am so glad I am blonde by choice

      I'm green by choice - does that count?
      Heh Heh




      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Bladerunner on March 03, 2008, 09:49:45 PM
      Hi all,

      Well it is not over till Natalee is send home.

      XTC DNA area may hold many mystery...
      The parked Hour Pendulum is now set in motion.
      Several Guillotine are being sharpen.
      when the Hour Pendulum reach 240 swing the auto Guillotine will fall.
      the foundation of babylon will be shake.

      To be continue...


      Ok,We will have the cigars ready! Let those heads roll!!  ::MonkeyCool::


      What does this mean?

      It means that Caps thinks the Babylon is starting to fall. Meaning the cover up and the corrupt officials.
      Will be in the new.

      He was arrested in the USA Aruba Government (big time MEP Supported) for oney laundering and falsification...


      Say that again.  ::MonkeyConfused::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Castaglance on March 03, 2008, 09:51:04 PM

      Kyle has already said that there were no human remains, and I believe him

      If you quote me, please include the quote for accuracy.  I never said there were no human remains.  I woudn't comment to that effect.  I have neither confirmed nor denied the issue.  The only comment I said was quoting Tim Trahan.
      thanks Kyle for the verification...I am so glad I am blonde by choice

      I'm green by choice - does that count?
      Heh Heh




      me thinks that saves us both IQ points...adorable green you


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: AZSunny on March 03, 2008, 09:54:14 PM
      Hi all,

      Well it is not over till Natalee is send home.

      XTC DNA area may hold many mystery...
      The parked Hour Pendulum is now set in motion.
      Several Guillotine are being sharpen.
      when the Hour Pendulum reach 240 swing the auto Guillotine will fall.
      the foundation of babylon will be shake.

      To be continue...


      Ok,We will have the cigars ready! Let those heads roll!!  ::MonkeyCool::


      What does this mean?

      It means that Caps thinks the Babylon is starting to fall. Meaning the cover up and the corrupt officials.
      Will be in the new.

      He was arrested in the USA Aruba Government (big time MEP Supported) for oney laundering and falsification...


      Say that again.  ::MonkeyConfused::

      so the arrest has already happened???  ******* help!  who??  (sandrak all over again)


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Kermit on March 03, 2008, 09:55:00 PM

      Kyle has already said that there were no human remains, and I believe him

      If you quote me, please include the quote for accuracy.  I never said there were no human remains.  I woudn't comment to that effect.  I have neither confirmed nor denied the issue.  The only comment I said was quoting Tim Trahan.
      thanks Kyle for the verification...I am so glad I am blonde by choice

      I'm green by choice - does that count?
      Heh Heh




      me thinks that saves us both IQ points...adorable green you

      I need all the IQ I can get Miss Serenity
      ribbit


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Magnolia on March 03, 2008, 09:55:54 PM

      [/quote]  This appears to be a top side (not direct view but behind the ear up and down (that I have here.)  You are looking down into the skull from the (person made) cavities on top.  Down in the left (your left) is the eye socket bone most likely.  There are other views here and there.  The darkened areas are where skull once was.     j/b
      [/quote]

      Yep...extreme head trauma...*she hit her head*...guess a lot of people from those parts hit their heads....could be anyone whacked on the head with a big rock...
      [/quote]

      Didn't Val say something about Joran knocking her head off right above the eyebrow?


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Castaglance on March 03, 2008, 09:57:32 PM

      Kyle has already said that there were no human remains, and I believe him

      If you quote me, please include the quote for accuracy.  I never said there were no human remains.  I woudn't comment to that effect.  I have neither confirmed nor denied the issue.  The only comment I said was quoting Tim Trahan.
      thanks Kyle for the verification...I am so glad I am blonde by choice

      I'm green by choice - does that count?
      Heh Heh




      me thinks that saves us both IQ points...adorable green you

      I need all the IQ I can get Miss Serenity
      ribbit

      I'd be more considered Ms. Scarlet


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: klaasend on March 03, 2008, 09:58:21 PM
      http://www.amigoe.com/artman/publish/artikel_40252.php

      Translated through google:

      Suspect miljoenenfraude at Lands laboratory arrested
      March 3, 2008, 18:42 (GMT -04:00)

        Email this article
        Print this article
         
         ORANJESTAD - The American authorities have Aruba at the request of a 53-year-old man arrested is suspected to have 5 million florin darkened laboratory at the Lands for which he worked. The arrest took place last Saturday in Miami at the request of the Public Prosecutor's Office (OM).

      The Landslaboratorium did at the end of last year declaration of the massive fraud. The ex-employee M.M.F. Was at that time already fled to Colombia. The OM issued an international opsporingbevel, with success. When the man last Thursday traveled to the United States, it was for by the American authorities getipt. "We have a Friday request for a provisional arrest and Saturday he was arrested," says Chief Hans Mos who are very satisfied with the good cooperation with the American authorities.

      F. Is suspected of embezzlement in employment, forgery, fraud and money laundering. He would Landslaboratorium the millions afhandig made by placing orders to non-existent companies in the United States. While local media reported that there are 10 million florin is darkened, according Mos far florin to five million in a period of 2002 to 2007. F. Is now in Florida for which Aruba has filed the request for his extradition. Is the suspect agrees to the extradition, the PPS that he expects within two weeks in Aruba.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: bluwaters on March 03, 2008, 09:58:26 PM

      Kyle has already said that there were no human remains, and I believe him

      If you quote me, please include the quote for accuracy.  I never said there were no human remains.  I woudn't comment to that effect.  I have neither confirmed nor denied the issue.  The only comment I said was quoting Tim Trahan.
      Kyle, thank you for the clarification. I could not find a statement from you anywhere that said "no human remains." Of course, I also didn't find a statement from you saying that there were human remains... ::MonkeyConfused::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Observer on March 03, 2008, 09:58:40 PM

      According to Dave and Art Wood thats how he acted in June 2005. We know he showed up with Dennis Jacobs on his day off flashing his gun around,they took at as a obvious sign to back off from the Van Der Sloots.

      Maybe Paulus is the big drug dealer and he hides behind his son Lorenzo

      Maybe Paulus helps move money that comes into the casinos for Columbia and Venezuela.
      Set's up offshore accounts.
      And has a fetish for young girls
      Maybe Joran is covering up for "your own father!"

      I watched something on the Excelsior casino the other day and over 30% of there revenue comes from South American's. I thought that was quite a large number considering Aruba is known to be visited mostly from Americans,the real figure is probably double that through money laundering. I still think Posner advised the powers that be who to hire in the U.S as far as Attorneys and PI'S.

      Last night they said
      77% of the Tourists are from the U.S.A
      & 5% from Canada

      Over 50% of the tourists return back to Aruba
      70% of those are time share owners


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Castaglance on March 03, 2008, 10:02:47 PM
      Last night they said
      77% of the Tourists are from the U.S.A
      & 5% from Canada

      Over 50% of the tourists return back to Aruba
      70% of those are time share owners
      [/quote]
      you mean before they started selling off thier shares


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Tamikosmom on March 03, 2008, 10:03:06 PM
      If Natalee's remains have been recovered ... somebody need to tell Tim Miller.  As of February 27, 2008 ... Tim's impression was that there were 169 targets which still needed to be searched.

      Janet

      +++++++++++


      Tim Miller
      On the Record w/ Greta
      February 27, 2008


      MILLER: The report we got is the DNA that came back did not match Natalee's DNA and when we located that it looked like more than just a piece of cloth and I mean we, we felt as though we seen a skull in there. We got the Aruba authorities involved, they felt there was something in there, we dove on it and the thing is that's only 1 of over 170 targets out there we still have to investigate, so we've got a lot of work ahead of us.

      Transcript - Heli (RU)


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Castaglance on March 03, 2008, 10:04:21 PM
      Last night they said
      77% of the Tourists are from the U.S.A
      & 5% from Canada

      Over 50% of the tourists return back to Aruba
      70% of those are time share owners
      you mean before they started selling off thier shares
      [/quote]

      their*, sorry for the typoneese, typing in the dark


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Observer on March 03, 2008, 10:07:51 PM
      Last night they said
      77% of the Tourists are from the U.S.A
      & 5% from Canada

      Over 50% of the tourists return back to Aruba
      70% of those are time share owners
      you mean before they started selling off thier shares
      [/quote]
      Thats what they were claiming in english on last nights show. Not sure where they pulled the data from or if it was true or not. I also read the other day that 80% of everyone in Aruba works in the Tourism Industry in some way. Isn't that amazing?


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Kermit on March 03, 2008, 10:08:08 PM

      Kyle has already said that there were no human remains, and I believe him

      If you quote me, please include the quote for accuracy.  I never said there were no human remains.  I woudn't comment to that effect.  I have neither confirmed nor denied the issue.  The only comment I said was quoting Tim Trahan.
      thanks Kyle for the verification...I am so glad I am blonde by choice

      I'm green by choice - does that count?
      Heh Heh




      me thinks that saves us both IQ points...adorable green you

      I need all the IQ I can get Miss Serenity
      ribbit

      I'd be more considered Ms. Scarlet

      Just like Ms. Klassend yee haw!


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: texasmom on March 03, 2008, 10:08:23 PM
      Heh Heh
      ribbit Miss Texasmom



      ribbit  ::MonkeyHaHa:: ribbit, Kermit
      I was skeeerd when I posted that last quote stack that you were gonna call me on it and then look what you did....ribbit
       ::MonkeyWink::   ::MonkeyCool::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Castaglance on March 03, 2008, 10:09:55 PM
      Last night they said
      77% of the Tourists are from the U.S.A
      & 5% from Canada

      Over 50% of the tourists return back to Aruba
      70% of those are time share owners
      you mean before they started selling off thier shares
      Thats what they were claiming in english on last nights show. Not sure where they pulled the data from or if it was true or not. I also read the other day that 80% of everyone in Aruba works in the Tourism Industry in some way. Isn't that amazing?
      [/quote]

      they have to redistribute that soiled money somehow


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Magnolia on March 03, 2008, 10:11:16 PM
      If Natalee's remains have been recovered ... somebody need to tell Tim Miller.  As of February 27, 2008 ... Tim's impression was that there were 169 targets which still needed to be searched.

      Janet

      +++++++++++


      Tim Miller
      On the Record w/ Greta
      February 27, 2008


      MILLER: The report we got is the DNA that came back did not match Natalee's DNA and when we located that it looked like more than just a piece of cloth and I mean we, we felt as though we seen a skull in there. We got the Aruba authorities involved, they felt there was something in there, we dove on it and the thing is that's only 1 of over 170 targets out there we still have to investigate, so we've got a lot of work ahead of us.

      Transcript - Heli (RU)

      Maybe we aren't allowed to know just yet.  Maybe they need more confirmation.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Castaglance on March 03, 2008, 10:11:47 PM
      Heh Heh
      ribbit Miss Texasmom



      ribbit  ::MonkeyHaHa:: ribbit, Kermit
      I was skeeerd when I posted that last quote stack that you were gonna call me on it and then look what you did....ribbit
       ::MonkeyWink::   ::MonkeyCool::


      sorry...I didn't know ALL the rules, my fault for the stacks


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: AZSunny on March 03, 2008, 10:14:54 PM
      http://www.amigoe.com/artman/publish/artikel_40252.php

      Translated through google:

      Suspect miljoenenfraude at Lands laboratory arrested
      March 3, 2008, 18:42 (GMT -04:00)

        Email this article
        Print this article
         
         ORANJESTAD - The American authorities have Aruba at the request of a 53-year-old man arrested is suspected to have 5 million florin darkened laboratory at the Lands for which he worked. The arrest took place last Saturday in Miami at the request of the Public Prosecutor's Office (OM).

      The Landslaboratorium did at the end of last year declaration of the massive fraud. The ex-employee M.M.F. Was at that time already fled to Colombia. The OM issued an international opsporingbevel, with success. When the man last Thursday traveled to the United States, it was for by the American authorities getipt. "We have a Friday request for a provisional arrest and Saturday he was arrested," says Chief Hans Mos who are very satisfied with the good cooperation with the American authorities.

      F. Is suspected of embezzlement in employment, forgery, fraud and money laundering. He would Landslaboratorium the millions afhandig made by placing orders to non-existent companies in the United States. While local media reported that there are 10 million florin is darkened, according Mos far florin to five million in a period of 2002 to 2007. F. Is now in Florida for which Aruba has filed the request for his extradition. Is the suspect agrees to the extradition, the PPS that he expects within two weeks in Aruba.

      Klaas is this who Capslock was talking about?  any idea who this guy is? 


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: private eye on March 03, 2008, 10:16:37 PM
      If Natalee's remains have been recovered ... somebody need to tell Tim Miller.  As of February 27, 2008 ... Tim's impression was that there were 169 targets which still needed to be searched.

      Janet

      +++++++++++


      Tim Miller
      On the Record w/ Greta
      February 27, 2008


      MILLER: The report we got is the DNA that came back did not match Natalee's DNA and when we located that it looked like more than just a piece of cloth and I mean we, we felt as though we seen a skull in there. We got the Aruba authorities involved, they felt there was something in there, we dove on it and the thing is that's only 1 of over 170 targets out there we still have to investigate, so we've got a lot of work ahead of us.

      Transcript - Heli (RU)

      Maybe we aren't allowed to know just yet.  Maybe they need more confirmation.

      I don't believe they have found Natalee's remains. I see and visit with Beth's Mom at least once a week, usually more, and she could not keep that secret. There are plenty or real mysteries with which to deal. It would be great though. I have a feeling that Beth would be with her Mom if that had happened as well.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: AZSunny on March 03, 2008, 10:17:06 PM

        This appears to be a top side (not direct view but behind the ear up and down (that I have here.)  You are looking down into the skull from the (person made) cavities on top.  Down in the left (your left) is the eye socket bone most likely.  There are other views here and there.  The darkened areas are where skull once was.     j/b
      [/quote]

      Yep...extreme head trauma...*she hit her head*...guess a lot of people from those parts hit their heads....could be anyone whacked on the head with a big rock...
      [/quote]

      Didn't Val say something about Joran knocking her head off right above the eyebrow?
      [/quote]

      Magnolia, when did he say this??..missed this one too!


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: jackb on March 03, 2008, 10:17:10 PM

        This appears to be a top side (not direct view but behind the ear up and down (that I have here.)  You are looking down into the skull from the (person made) cavities on top.  Down in the left (your left) is the eye socket bone most likely.  There are other views here and there.  The darkened areas are where skull once was.     j/b
      [/quote]

      Yep...extreme head trauma...*she hit her head*...guess a lot of people from those parts hit their heads....could be anyone whacked on the head with a big rock...
      [/quote]

      Didn't Val say something about Joran knocking her head off right above the eyebrow?
      [/quote]

      Appears to me to be a size 14 rock, followed up by a (at least one) GSW.
             Jack blue


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: AZSunny on March 03, 2008, 10:19:16 PM
      If Natalee's remains have been recovered ... somebody need to tell Tim Miller.  As of February 27, 2008 ... Tim's impression was that there were 169 targets which still needed to be searched.

      Janet

      +++++++++++


      Tim Miller
      On the Record w/ Greta
      February 27, 2008


      MILLER: The report we got is the DNA that came back did not match Natalee's DNA and when we located that it looked like more than just a piece of cloth and I mean we, we felt as though we seen a skull in there. We got the Aruba authorities involved, they felt there was something in there, we dove on it and the thing is that's only 1 of over 170 targets out there we still have to investigate, so we've got a lot of work ahead of us.

      Transcript - Heli (RU)

      Maybe we aren't allowed to know just yet.  Maybe they need more confirmation.

      I don't believe they have found Natalee's remains. I see and visit with Beth's Mom at least once a week, usually more, and she could not keep that secret. There are plenty or real mysteries with which to deal. It would be great though. I have a feeling that Beth would be with her Mom if that had happened as well.

      Is it possible that the testing is not complete, and Beth doesn't know anything to share yet??


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: private eye on March 03, 2008, 10:19:49 PM

        This appears to be a top side (not direct view but behind the ear up and down (that I have here.)  You are looking down into the skull from the (person made) cavities on top.  Down in the left (your left) is the eye socket bone most likely.  There are other views here and there.  The darkened areas are where skull once was.     j/b

      Yep...extreme head trauma...*she hit her head*...guess a lot of people from those parts hit their heads....could be anyone whacked on the head with a big rock...
      [/quote]

      Didn't Val say something about Joran knocking her head off right above the eyebrow?
      [/quote]

      Appears to me to be a size 14 rock, followed up by a (at least one) GSW.
             Jack blue
      [/quote]

      I wonder if that is why Joran's head is so big? Either that or Anita did the Monstor Mash:)


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: jackb on March 03, 2008, 10:19:53 PM

        This appears to be a top side (not direct view but behind the ear up and down (that I have here.)  You are looking down into the skull from the (person made) cavities on top.  Down in the left (your left) is the eye socket bone most likely.  There are other views here and there.  The darkened areas are where skull once was.     j/b

      Yep...extreme head trauma...*she hit her head*...guess a lot of people from those parts hit their heads....could be anyone whacked on the head with a big rock...
      [/quote]

      Didn't Val say something about Joran knocking her head off right above the eyebrow?
      [/quote]

      Appears to me to be a size 14 rock, followed up by a (at least one) GSW.
             Jack blue
      [/quote]
      Also other face trauma could be the result of pounding.  That Piece os S*** needs to let a man get ahold of him.  I really detest all of those involved in their violence, filth and greed at the expence of weaker vessels.       


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Blonde on March 03, 2008, 10:20:18 PM
      (http://img136.imageshack.us/img136/1057/skullnocolorur2.jpg)

      Same object that appears to be a skull with color removed and flipped the pic around



      (http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/skullnocolorur2.jpg)

      black and white then negitive

      This reminds me of the book by Iris Johansen called Face of Deception..Creepy indeed..

      I too think it is a skull.  If it is in fact a skull and DNA proves it not to be Natalee, I hope they let one of those talented people recreate the face.  There is a woman in the US who is particularly excellent at this skill and has worked with many in law enforcement on especially difficult and mysterious cases, but her name escapes me at the moment.

      How weird that that subject is what this book is about...Very scarey read..

      That might be her - not sure.  The woman I was referring to has worked with John Walsh on several high profile cases.  One that comes to mind is the one in south Florida where a hiker stumbled upon eight (I think) skeletal remains.  She recreated all their faces and was so accurate they were almost all immediately identified by their families.  The reconstructions side by side by the persons photographs were remarkable.  Absolutely amazing.

      Kermit and friends:  Just sent Klass a more visable version of what you posted.  Naner, naner, nanter (as the lady said,)  you will see something most of the other people on the other blogs have not.  What you will be seeing is a top and side view where you are looking down into the skull.  It appears the eye socket holder is in the (my)  left lower corner of the pic I sent.  It is your picture I messed with this time Kermit, the one you posted.
      Just made it a bit more visable.  If Klass will send it it is in her e-mail.  LOL
       blue the strange. 


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: private eye on March 03, 2008, 10:20:47 PM
      Monstor is a Latin Monster


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Blonde on March 03, 2008, 10:21:36 PM
      I don't know how my picture got in there
      (http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/skullnocolorur2.jpg)


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: jackb on March 03, 2008, 10:22:06 PM

        This appears to be a top side (not direct view but behind the ear up and down (that I have here.)  You are looking down into the skull from the (person made) cavities on top.  Down in the left (your left) is the eye socket bone most likely.  There are other views here and there.  The darkened areas are where skull once was.     j/b

      Yep...extreme head trauma...*she hit her head*...guess a lot of people from those parts hit their heads....could be anyone whacked on the head with a big rock...
      [/quote]

      Didn't Val say something about Joran knocking her head off right above the eyebrow?
      [/quote]

      Appears to me to be a size 14 rock, followed up by a (at least one) GSW.
             Jack blue
      [/quote] Never heard of anyone in his family saying anything neg. about the POS, but that seems to be the case, because in what I have the top is missing.  j/b


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: klaasend on March 03, 2008, 10:25:20 PM
      http://www.amigoe.com/artman/publish/artikel_40252.php

      Translated through google:

      Suspect miljoenenfraude at Lands laboratory arrested
      March 3, 2008, 18:42 (GMT -04:00)

        Email this article
        Print this article
         
         ORANJESTAD - The American authorities have Aruba at the request of a 53-year-old man arrested is suspected to have 5 million florin darkened laboratory at the Lands for which he worked. The arrest took place last Saturday in Miami at the request of the Public Prosecutor's Office (OM).

      The Landslaboratorium did at the end of last year declaration of the massive fraud. The ex-employee M.M.F. Was at that time already fled to Colombia. The OM issued an international opsporingbevel, with success. When the man last Thursday traveled to the United States, it was for by the American authorities getipt. "We have a Friday request for a provisional arrest and Saturday he was arrested," says Chief Hans Mos who are very satisfied with the good cooperation with the American authorities.

      F. Is suspected of embezzlement in employment, forgery, fraud and money laundering. He would Landslaboratorium the millions afhandig made by placing orders to non-existent companies in the United States. While local media reported that there are 10 million florin is darkened, according Mos far florin to five million in a period of 2002 to 2007. F. Is now in Florida for which Aruba has filed the request for his extradition. Is the suspect agrees to the extradition, the PPS that he expects within two weeks in Aruba.


      AZLady - I think Caplock is referring to this although I could be mistaken


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Castaglance on March 03, 2008, 10:26:06 PM
      k, this is my limit here today, nite
      sweet ornery monkey dreams all...


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: jackb on March 03, 2008, 10:26:59 PM
      I don't know how my picture got in there
      (http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/skullnocolorur2.jpg)

      Honey, if that is you, maybe you have nervosa anorexia.  Now maybe a few milkshakes would help.  Big 'ol fat cheezeburger.....anything.   j/b


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Destiny on March 03, 2008, 10:28:35 PM
      k, this is my limit here today, nite
      sweet ornery monkey dreams all...


      Sweet Dreams in the Monkey bunky...


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Magnolia on March 03, 2008, 10:28:43 PM
      I wish I were organized like Janet....but I am not.
      I think it was on his my space or the one with the bloody
      bathtub pictures.  I'll bet Klaas remembers.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Observer on March 03, 2008, 10:28:59 PM

      I don't believe they have found Natalee's remains. I see and visit with Beth's Mom at least once a week, usually more, and she could not keep that secret. There are plenty or real mysteries with which to deal. It would be great though. I have a feeling that Beth would be with her Mom if that had happened as well.

      Is it possible that the testing is not complete, and Beth doesn't know anything to share yet??
      I listened to Dr.Baden very closely when he spoke and If Natalee was found wrapped in something in very deep waters,DNA testing would be very easy to do as the body would be well preserved. However a body found in only 90 feet of water totally exposed after several years,my guess would be that it would be quite difficult and take a great deal of time. Like some were talking earlier they can reconstruct the skull to determine what the face looked like,they have a couple of experts that do a amazing job at that.

      P.S. I am not saying she was found or wasnt. My thought is something is obviously fishy with that cage and there is more to it.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: klaasend on March 03, 2008, 10:30:25 PM
      k, this is my limit here today, nite
      sweet ornery monkey dreams all...

      Nite Castaglance


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Destiny on March 03, 2008, 10:31:49 PM
      I don't know how my picture got in there
      (http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/skullnocolorur2.jpg)

      Honey, if that is you, maybe you have nervosa anorexia.  Now maybe a few milkshakes would help.  Big 'ol fat cheezeburger.....anything.   j/b

       ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: klaasend on March 03, 2008, 10:32:08 PM
      I wish I were organized like Janet....but I am not.
      I think it was on his my space or the one with the bloody
      bathtub pictures.  I'll bet Klaas remembers.

      It was on Val's myspace.  The bloody bathtub pic was on one of Joran's friends sites I think (not Vals).


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Destiny on March 03, 2008, 10:37:18 PM

      I don't believe they have found Natalee's remains. I see and visit with Beth's Mom at least once a week, usually more, and she could not keep that secret. There are plenty or real mysteries with which to deal. It would be great though. I have a feeling that Beth would be with her Mom if that had happened as well.

      Is it possible that the testing is not complete, and Beth doesn't know anything to share yet??
      I listened to Dr.Baden very closely when he spoke and If Natalee was found wrapped in something in very deep waters,DNA testing would be very easy to do as the body would be well preserved. However a body found in only 90 feet of water totally exposed after several years,my guess would be that it would be quite difficult and take a great deal of time. Like some were talking earlier they can reconstruct the skull to determine what the face looked like,they have a couple of experts that do a amazing job at that.

      P.S. I am not saying she was found or wasnt. My thought is something is obviously fishy with that cage and there is more to it.

      Astute Observation....

      KLASS...OE obviously doesn't have a problem with us *speculating* amongst ourselves...how do you feel about posting the 6 original photos sent to the front page...just to help us keep our skills honed...and to keep us out of trouble ;-)


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Magnolia on March 03, 2008, 10:37:32 PM
      I wish I were organized like Janet....but I am not.
      I think it was on his my space or the one with the bloody
      bathtub pictures.  I'll bet Klaas remembers.

      It was on Val's myspace.  The bloody bathtub pic was on one of Joran's friends sites I think (not Vals).

      Thank you, Klaas.....I thought it was one of the two.
      That is what always made me think of the baseball bat.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Tamikosmom on March 03, 2008, 10:42:31 PM
      Good Night Monkeys.

      A game serious game of Scrabble with hubby tonight.  The stakes are high ... I hope I win.

      Janet
      7:45 PM


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: klaasend on March 03, 2008, 10:42:51 PM
      Destiny - I'm not going to repost them again, they've been brought forward several times by others. 


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Observer on March 03, 2008, 10:43:11 PM
      Ok here is the guy that was busted in Miami...Who is he connected to CAPS?

      Awemainta March 4th 2008
      Maiky Farro (53 yrs old)
      (http://i198.photobucket.com/albums/aa118/Observer00000007/laundering.jpg)


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Dayhiker on March 03, 2008, 10:43:13 PM

      You know Peter much better than we do being in Holland, but we have heard that he not only investigates murders with vigor but like to bust the occasional corrupt politician as well. Is this true?

      he did so many cases.
      http://www.peterrdevries.nl/tekst/dossierindextot.htm

      about corrupt officials, right out of my head:

      1. exposed a public prosecutor (Tonino) with child porn on his computer. Tonino put his computer with the garbage, that's how peter r. got hold of the computer. the public prosecutor got suspended.

      2. exposed the upcoming reserve queen (mabel wisse smit) as having a relationship with dutch biggest gangster Klaas Bruinsma in the 80s. mabel wisse smit lied about this to the prime minister Balkenende. prince johan-friso (son of queen beatrix) lost his right to the dutch throne because of this.

      3. exposed dutch secret service (AIVD) trying to frame the later assassinated pim fortuyn as if he had sex with underage drugs addicted moroccan boys.
      (pim fortuyn got assassinated a week before the elections as he was leading the polls)

      4. exposed dutch board of procureurs generaal violating parking rules right outside the dutch OM headoffice.

      5. exposed officials of the dutch police national headquarters violating parking rules outside the hq's.
      head of police promised change. year later the violating was still going on.

      6. exposed a police officer (possible drugging and) changing the will (testament) of multiple old, dying people so he inherited their money / real estate.

      i am sure i forgot something.

      most of these involved hidden camera.


      Thanks caesu! It looks like Peter does have a knack for bring down corrupt public officials. Aruba would be heaven for such an investigation.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: klaasend on March 03, 2008, 10:43:32 PM
      Good Night Monkeys.

      A game serious game of Scrabble with hubby tonight.  The stakes are high ... I hope I win.

      Janet
      7:45 PM

      Nite Janet - you'll win..I'm sure of it  ::MonkeyWink::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: jackb on March 03, 2008, 10:43:37 PM
      I wish I were organized like Janet....but I am not.
      I think it was on his my space or the one with the bloody
      bathtub pictures.  I'll bet Klaas remembers.

      It was on Val's myspace.  The bloody bathtub pic was on one of Joran's friends sites I think (not Vals).

      Thank you, Klaas.....I thought it was one of the two.
      That is what always made me think of the baseball bat.
        That would be interesting to have.  Anyone got it?  The Val's my space thing and saying.      j/b


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: private eye on March 03, 2008, 10:43:52 PM

      I don't believe they have found Natalee's remains. I see and visit with Beth's Mom at least once a week, usually more, and she could not keep that secret. There are plenty or real mysteries with which to deal. It would be great though. I have a feeling that Beth would be with her Mom if that had happened as well.

      Is it possible that the testing is not complete, and Beth doesn't know anything to share yet??
      I listened to Dr.Baden very closely when he spoke and If Natalee was found wrapped in something in very deep waters,DNA testing would be very easy to do as the body would be well preserved. However a body found in only 90 feet of water totally exposed after several years,my guess would be that it would be quite difficult and take a great deal of time. Like some were talking earlier they can reconstruct the skull to determine what the face looked like,they have a couple of experts that do a amazing job at that.

      P.S. I am not saying she was found or wasnt. My thought is something is obviously fishy with that cage and there is more to it.

      I guess nothing is impossible, and I would be thrilled to be wrong, but I don't think so.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Destiny on March 03, 2008, 10:44:29 PM
      Destiny - I'm not going to repost them again, they've been brought forward several times by others. 

      Sorry Klaas...was not aware...Thank You.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: klaasend on March 03, 2008, 10:46:59 PM
      http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.individual&videoid=28677295

      Description:  We went to chill in a local bar in Noord, Aruba. This old man came to talk to us about a maiky farro that had stole something somewhere.

       ::MonkeyCool::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: klaasend on March 03, 2008, 10:50:17 PM
      Destiny - I'm not going to repost them again, they've been brought forward several times by others. 

      Sorry Klaas...was not aware...Thank You.

      I'm pretty sure they were posted in this thread earlier today.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: klaasend on March 03, 2008, 10:52:06 PM
      I wish I were organized like Janet....but I am not.
      I think it was on his my space or the one with the bloody
      bathtub pictures.  I'll bet Klaas remembers.

      It was on Val's myspace.  The bloody bathtub pic was on one of Joran's friends sites I think (not Vals).

      Thank you, Klaas.....I thought it was one of the two.
      That is what always made me think of the baseball bat.
        That would be interesting to have.  Anyone got it?  The Val's my space thing and saying.      j/b

      Jackb - it was so early in the case most of us (me in particular) didn't even think to save it.  Since then of course that Myspace is long gone and he's started a new one.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: martini on March 03, 2008, 10:53:00 PM
      thumbs-down: an act, instance, or sign of disapproval, a hand signal, interpreted to be negative, which consists of a fist, sideways, with the thumb pointing to the ground, below satisfactory or unacceptable.

      When Roman gladiators received the thumbs down signal, it meant that a he was to live. It signified that the guards were to put their swords into the ground.

      PERSISTENCE: This is the companion word to "patience." Both are firm requirements in dealing with people from other societies around the world. http://www.csupomona.edu/~tassi/gestures.htm

      By their fruits (and hand gestures) ye shall know them...

      Note to K~ you are one cool dude...if only I was 20 years younger.
      Please take my post with a grain of salt. Thanks for all you do, Martini


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Observer on March 03, 2008, 10:54:19 PM
      http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.individual&videoid=28677295

      Description:  We went to chill in a local bar in Noord, Aruba. This old man came to talk to us about a maiky farro that had stole something somewhere.

       ::MonkeyCool::
      ::MonkeyShocked:: I posted that after you..Sounds like a local guy from the Noord/Orajanstead area.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: texasmom on March 03, 2008, 10:57:28 PM
      Heh Heh
      ribbit Miss Texasmom



      ribbit  ::MonkeyHaHa:: ribbit, Kermit
      I was skeeerd when I posted that last quote stack that you were gonna call me on it and then look what you did....ribbit
       ::MonkeyWink::   ::MonkeyCool::


      sorry...I didn't know ALL the rules, my fault for the stacks

      Not a problem at all for me Castaglance, I was just "ribbing" Kermit regarding a comment he made the other day.

      By the way, I'm not sure I've said; WELCOME TO SCARED MONKEYS!!! ::MonkeyDance::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Bladerunner on March 03, 2008, 11:00:21 PM
      http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.individual&videoid=28677295

      Description:  We went to chill in a local bar in Noord, Aruba. This old man came to talk to us about a maiky farro that had stole something somewhere.

       ::MonkeyCool::
      ::MonkeyShocked:: I posted that after you..Sounds like a local guy from the Noord/Orajanstead area.

      Surname Farro in Aruba, Dutch Caribbean
      Posted by: Errol Farro (ID *****8571) Date: January 20, 2007 at 08:54:38
         of 33 


      My name is Errol Farro born in Aruba in 1961. I'm married and am the father of 3 sons. Farro family in Aruba is very large. I'm not sure when the first Farro came to Aruba but I suspect in the 19th century and from Italy. I'm still looking for this information. Any help with this or additional information is appreciated.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Sea Searcher on March 03, 2008, 11:00:30 PM

      I don't believe they have found Natalee's remains. I see and visit with Beth's Mom at least once a week, usually more, and she could not keep that secret. There are plenty or real mysteries with which to deal. It would be great though. I have a feeling that Beth would be with her Mom if that had happened as well.

      Is it possible that the testing is not complete, and Beth doesn't know anything to share yet??
      I listened to Dr.Baden very closely when he spoke and If Natalee was found wrapped in something in very deep waters,DNA testing would be very easy to do as the body would be well preserved. However a body found in only 90 feet of water totally exposed after several years,my guess would be that it would be quite difficult and take a great deal of time. Like some were talking earlier they can reconstruct the skull to determine what the face looked like,they have a couple of experts that do a amazing job at that.

      P.S. I am not saying she was found or wasnt. My thought is something is obviously fishy with that cage and there is more to it.

      There were three ROV dive videos of the trap.  Video 1 : 29th Dec - ROV visual inspection of the trap.  (very small clip of this video on Dateline).  Remember, the Dateline footage was taken over our shoulders by filming the ROV monitor.  The footage is not the recorded ROV footage.
      Video 2: Dec 30th - ROV and Diver visual-only inspection of trap.  This is the dive Dateline and Tim Miller witnessed, also the dive footage the screen captures I made came from that were posted by Robin at BNH.  I sent these 6 screen shots to the FBI and the FBI only. I was shocked to see them posted.  I thought we had a security breach on the boat from my workstation or a leak from the FBI.  Turns out the FBI gave them to Dave H. after he couldn't get them from me.    After Tim Miller told Dave that we found her in a trap with 99.9% certainty (this is pre-diver inspection), Dave very reasonably requested them from me.  I badly wanted to send them to him, but couldn't.  Apparently, shortly therafter the FBI send the screen shots to Dave anyway, and therefore Robin had them.
      (quote from OE above)

      Gosh...I hope I did this right..

      I agree with your statement *******...when OE posted this, my first thoughts were..
      Why send pictures of a cage that wasn't important, to the FBI ????? and one step further,
      Why would the FBI send them to Dave H ????? certainly not for identification purposes..

      perhaps OE has to send ALL pics to FBI no matter what's in them..I don't know and he's
      not here to explain (not that he has to) but I'm really confused by this..and I also
      believe that cage is important.

      Forgive me if I screwed this post up...I'm new to this and a lousy typist to boot..

      but I love the monkey emoticons and want to send this to my boss  ::MonkeyTongue:: all in fun...


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: texasmom on March 03, 2008, 11:02:55 PM
      Good Night Monkeys.

      A game serious game of Scrabble with hubby tonight.  The stakes are high ... I hope I win.

      Janet
      7:45 PM

      Goodnight Janet, and Good Luck!


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Bladerunner on March 03, 2008, 11:04:39 PM
      http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.individual&videoid=28677295

      Description:  We went to chill in a local bar in Noord, Aruba. This old man came to talk to us about a maiky farro that had stole something somewhere.

       ::MonkeyCool::
      ::MonkeyShocked:: I posted that after you..Sounds like a local guy from the Noord/Orajanstead area.

      Surname Farro in Aruba, Dutch Caribbean
      Posted by: Errol Farro (ID *****8571) Date: January 20, 2007 at 08:54:38
         of 33 


      My name is Errol Farro born in Aruba in 1961. I'm married and am the father of 3 sons. Farro family in Aruba is very large. I'm not sure when the first Farro came to Aruba but I suspect in the 19th century and from Italy. I'm still looking for this information. Any help with this or additional information is appreciated.


      Who is Daniel Farro?


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: private eye on March 03, 2008, 11:04:59 PM
      But Beth has been known to keep secrets. But she was elated and crushed already by one find, and I assumed it was this one. Not because of any misdeed, just the process.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Silverfox on March 03, 2008, 11:05:13 PM
      (http://i195.photobucket.com/albums/z215/kickradio/harryking.jpg)

      Well.... Here is my take, for whatever it is worth and means.

      1. Rumor that AF2 was/is on the island of Aruba, backed up by an alleged photo of the jet (has this photo really been confirmed?).

      2. Quick departure of the Persistence (Thank God).

      3. Assassination (or military strike) of/on a high-ranking FARC revolutionary official allegedly in Ecuador by the government of Columbia (with alleged U.S. Backing).

      4. Some rumors (suggestions, logical conclusions, educated guesses, etc.) that the Persistence may have identified much more than just possible crab traps with questionable contents -- but perhaps and entire underwater "drop" system (post office) of a network for smuggling drugs in the vicinity of Aruba.

      5. Is so the potential of an extensive money laundering system (drug payoffs and proceeds) through casinos, banks, businesses, etc. -- potentially an entire economy based upon this system -- with alleged connections back to FARC, Hugo, etc... etc...

      --------

      With those things in mind I can take a little historical perspective that dates back to 1983.

      In 1983 I, personally, was a participant in a small select group of people who were in Washington, D.C. for a conference on government leadership.

      As a group we were supposed to meet Then President Ronald Regan for a photo session at the White House.

      That meeting was abruptly canceled due to a crisis brewing in the Caribbean.  In order to pacify us the White House dispatched to one of our meetings a replacement -- The Secretary of Defense, Dick Cheney.

      Secretary Cheney then briefed us on what was going on.  An expected coup on the island of Grenada by leftist hardliners.  He explained that should such an event be successful that the U.S. was prepared to invade the island in order to protect American medical students who were attending college there.  As a side note he also explained in great detail the  New "Star Wars" Strategy that was going to be released to the Congress.

      Now... to me this is all interesting in perspective with recent developments.

      Vice President Cheney, of course, is an expert on the Caribbean due to hard core first hand experience.

      I am not saying he was/is in Aruba, but if the jet pic is authenic and "if" it's official clearance to land was based upon the id of Air Force 2.  This id is only used by the Vice President and pertains to any plane or air transport vehicle the President might be on (even a piper cub).  It could be part of a strategy to worry Chavez that the Veep is monitoring and preparing (remember, if there is a nexus between an elaborate network of underwater drug post offices, Chavez, Drug Cartels and FARC -- then the "Noriega" factor could surface).

      I do not believe it is coincidence that this Jet (and whomever might be on board) just happens to be there when such an important Military operation (by an allied country) is going on.  I also feel that the Persistence was warned to clear out of the area for their own safety.  In addition, if the above premises are correct then the data they carry could very well bring Chavez down.  I do not feel their mission there was to intentionally gather intelligence data about drug trafficking -- but certainly if they have discovered what would be considered documented hard core evidence and subject them to possible attack.

      Do not underestimate the image of Cheney in the Caribbean and South America.  With the recent development of the U.S. Navy shooting down a satellite brings back to me memories of that briefing back in 1983 by Cheney when he showed us an elaborate film which  showed how the system would conceivably work.  As you might recall the former USSR feared that possibility that the U.S. could even think of developing such a defense system.

      I believe that the references by the Aruban Prosecutor that the Holloway family, the Mass Media and the DEA agent actions made prosecution difficult were a "masked" reference and warning in an attempt to let us know that there was much more going on behind the scenes.

      Many of us in the past at RWV and other sites in the early days felt there was much more involved here than meets the eye. 

      What is sad is that the "cover-up" that we all know now that exists is probably somehow linked to all of the political and economic upheaval in the region on both sides of the conflict and that Natalee really did find herself in the middle of all of this.  Why else would a judge rule that Joran should continue to stay incarcerated and then abruptly, on the same day, reverse that ruling upon returning to the safety of his own island?  Why else do prosecutors suddenly get sent on vacation during critical times except perhaps in the interest of National Security?

      I would venture to guess that the protection Paulus et. al. gets is because of his knowledge of such things for either side.

      We can only pray that whatever keeps justice from prevailing for Natalee is uncovered in the right way properly dealt with.  Those responsible for her disappearance and presumed death should be prosecuted and those responsible for the cover-up should, at best, be admonished and publicly exposed for the sad humanitarian effort that has been accorded to Natalee, her family and friends.

      Just my humble opinion.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Observer on March 03, 2008, 11:08:44 PM
      The Awemainta article last paragraph says that Maiky is supected of the crimes from 2002-2007. He is a Patronisa-dor  of the MEP and friends of one of the ministers.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Lala'sMom on March 03, 2008, 11:10:16 PM
      Hi all,

      Well it is not over till Natalee is send home.

      XTC DNA area may hold many mystery...
      The parked Hour Pendulum is now set in motion.
      Several Guillotine are being sharpen.
      when the Hour Pendulum reach 240 swing the auto Guillotine will fall.
      the foundation of babylon will be shake.

      To be continue...


      I knew it!!  Caps is really Shango! LOL  Just kidding.  What is really scary is I actually think I understand him.  ::MonkeyShocked::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: bluwaters on March 03, 2008, 11:14:06 PM
      Silverfox
      What an interesting and thought provoking post.
      I well remember Reagan's "Star Wars" defence plan.
      Monkey brains are churning and turning tonight!


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: wreck on March 03, 2008, 11:14:18 PM
      (http://i195.photobucket.com/albums/z215/kickradio/harryking.jpg)

      Well.... Here is my take, for whatever it is worth and means.

      1. Rumor that AF2 was/is on the island of Aruba, backed up by an alleged photo of the jet (has this photo really been confirmed?).

      2. Quick departure of the Persistence (Thank God).

      3. Assassination (or military strike) of/on a high-ranking FARC revolutionary official allegedly in Ecuador by the government of Columbia (with alleged U.S. Backing).

      4. Some rumors (suggestions, logical conclusions, educated guesses, etc.) that the Persistence may have identified much more than just possible crab traps with questionable contents -- but perhaps and entire underwater "drop" system (post office) of a network for smuggling drugs in the vicinity of Aruba.

      5. Is so the potential of an extensive money laundering system (drug payoffs and proceeds) through casinos, banks, businesses, etc. -- potentially an entire economy based upon this system -- with alleged connections back to FARC, Hugo, etc... etc...

      --------

      With those things in mind I can take a little historical perspective that dates back to 1983.

      In 1983 I, personally, was a participant in a small select group of people who were in Washington, D.C. for a conference on government leadership.

      As a group we were supposed to meet Then President Ronald Regan for a photo session at the White House.

      That meeting was abruptly canceled due to a crisis brewing in the Caribbean.  In order to pacify us the White House dispatched to one of our meetings a replacement -- The Secretary of Defense, Dick Cheney.

      Secretary Cheney then briefed us on what was going on.  An expected coup on the island of Grenada by leftist hardliners.  He explained that should such an event be successful that the U.S. was prepared to invade the island in order to protect American medical students who were attending college there.  As a side note he also explained in great detail the  New "Star Wars" Strategy that was going to be released to the Congress.

      Now... to me this is all interesting in perspective with recent developments.

      Vice President Cheney, of course, is an expert on the Caribbean due to hard core first hand experience.

      I am not saying he was/is in Aruba, but if the jet pic is authenic and "if" it's official clearance to land was based upon the id of Air Force 2.  This id is only used by the Vice President and pertains to any plane or air transport vehicle the President might be on (even a piper cub).  It could be part of a strategy to worry Chavez that the Veep is monitoring and preparing (remember, if there is a nexus between an elaborate network of underwater drug post offices, Chavez, Drug Cartels and FARC -- then the "Noriega" factor could surface).

      I do not believe it is coincidence that this Jet (and whomever might be on board) just happens to be there when such an important Military operation (by an allied country) is going on.  I also feel that the Persistence was warned to clear out of the area for their own safety.  In addition, if the above premises are correct then the data they carry could very well bring Chavez down.  I do not feel their mission there was to intentionally gather intelligence data about drug trafficking -- but certainly if they have discovered what would be considered documented hard core evidence and subject them to possible attack.

      Do not underestimate the image of Cheney in the Caribbean and South America.  With the recent development of the U.S. Navy shooting down a satellite brings back to me memories of that briefing back in 1983 by Cheney when he showed us an elaborate film which  showed how the system would conceivably work.  As you might recall the former USSR feared that possibility that the U.S. could even think of developing such a defense system.

      I believe that the references by the Aruban Prosecutor that the Holloway family, the Mass Media and the DEA agent actions made prosecution difficult were a "masked" reference and warning in an attempt to let us know that there was much more going on behind the scenes.

      Many of us in the past at RWV and other sites in the early days felt there was much more involved here than meets the eye. 

      What is sad is that the "cover-up" that we all know now that exists is probably somehow linked to all of the political and economic upheaval in the region on both sides of the conflict and that Natalee really did find herself in the middle of all of this.  Why else would a judge rule that Joran should continue to stay incarcerated and then abruptly, on the same day, reverse that ruling upon returning to the safety of his own island?  Why else do prosecutors suddenly get sent on vacation during critical times except perhaps in the interest of National Security?

      I would venture to guess that the protection Paulus et. al. gets is because of his knowledge of such things for either side.

      We can only pray that whatever keeps justice from prevailing for Natalee is uncovered in the right way properly dealt with.  Those responsible for her disappearance and presumed death should be prosecuted and those responsible for the cover-up should, at best, be admonished and publicly exposed for the sad humanitarian effort that has been accorded to Natalee, her family and friends.

      Just my humble opinion.
      Good thoughts! I have thought for a very long time that the Natalee "case" had very large "global" ties. I have always believed our perceived notion that our own U.S. government was not doing anything stemmed from the whole South America/world scene. There has been so much at stake in the region that our own government could not make public on what they "knew."


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Bladerunner on March 03, 2008, 11:21:38 PM
      Silverfox

      Post of the Day


      Just one thing though related to the premise that Persistence had accidently mapped a post office network: Given your hypothesis that this post office network could help bring down Chavez, and the fact that it was well known the ship was using sophisticated sonar off Aruba, don't you think that the ship would have been "intercepted" in some way in order for that information to never be collected?


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: texasmom on March 03, 2008, 11:31:03 PM
      Hi all,

      Well it is not over till Natalee is send home.

      XTC DNA area may hold many mystery...
      The parked Hour Pendulum is now set in motion.
      Several Guillotine are being sharpen.
      when the Hour Pendulum reach 240 swing the auto Guillotine will fall.
      the foundation of babylon will be shake.

      To be continue...


      I knew it!!  Caps is really Shango! LOL  Just kidding.  What is really scary is I actually think I understand him.  ::MonkeyShocked::

      Me too Lala's!  I love it, that Shango unleashed is finally paying off... ::MonkeyHaHa::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Silverfox on March 03, 2008, 11:31:14 PM
      Silverfox

      Post of the Day


      Just one thing though related to the premise that Persistence had accidently mapped a post office network: Given your hypothesis that this post office network could help bring down Chavez, and the fact that it was well known the ship was using sophisticated sonar off Aruba, don't you think that the ship would have been "intercepted" in some way in order for that information to never be collected?

      Actually I believe that certain "parties" were probably scared to death.



      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Bladerunner on March 03, 2008, 11:33:53 PM
      Silverfox

      Post of the Day


      Just one thing though related to the premise that Persistence had accidently mapped a post office network: Given your hypothesis that this post office network could help bring down Chavez, and the fact that it was well known the ship was using sophisticated sonar off Aruba, don't you think that the ship would have been "intercepted" in some way in order for that information to never be collected?

      Actually I believe that certain "parties" were probably scared to death.



      Clear and present danger indeed!


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Spock on March 03, 2008, 11:34:05 PM
      Anything new or more speculation?


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Magnolia on March 03, 2008, 11:36:28 PM
      Hi all,

      Well it is not over till Natalee is send home.

      XTC DNA area may hold many mystery...
      The parked Hour Pendulum is now set in motion.
      Several Guillotine are being sharpen.
      when the Hour Pendulum reach 240 swing the auto Guillotine will fall.
      the foundation of babylon will be shake.

      To be continue..

      Lala, What is 240 swings of the Hour Pendalum?.


      I knew it!!  Caps is really Shango! LOL  Just kidding.  What is really scary is I actually think I understand him.  ::MonkeyShocked::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Silverfox on March 03, 2008, 11:39:14 PM
      Silverfox
      What an interesting and thought provoking post.
      I well remember Reagan's "Star Wars" defence plan.
      Monkey brains are churning and turning tonight!

      To me it is thought-provoking to consider that this operation by the Columbian Government was well planned in advance -- and, that the U.S. Government may actually have been monitoring Venzuela's response from Aruba.  (This is Cheney's style)

      I would also guess that there may well be a U.S. Navy presence in the vicinity by the time of the Columbian military strike took place.  This is another reason I feel the Persistence was relatively safe (like having armed guards within shouting distance).


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Observer on March 03, 2008, 11:39:18 PM
      Anything new or more speculation?
      Beth is Holland and will be on a TV show tommorow(Jensen and maybee Pauw and Witteman).

      Maiky Farro a supporter of the MEP and a friend of one of the ministers was just arrested in Miami by Aruban request for suspicion of Money Laundering and Fraude. He is awaiting extradition.

      Caps says to sharpen the guillotines in preperation for the fall of babylon  ::MonkeyCool::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: texasmom on March 03, 2008, 11:41:15 PM
      Silverfox,
      I agree with bladerunner, POST OF THE DAY!

      Good Work!   ::MonkeyDance::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Bladerunner on March 03, 2008, 11:42:06 PM
      Posted on Sun, Feb. 10, 2008


      Underground drug trade is going underwater, too
      By Juan Forero

      Washington Post

      BAHIA MALAGA, Colombia - In the annals of the drug trade, traffickers have swallowed cocaine pellets, dissolved the powder into ceramics, and flown the drug as far as Africa on flimsy planes - anything to elude detection and get a lucrative product to market.
      Now, the cartels seem to be increasingly going beneath the waves, relying on submarines built in clandestine jungle shipyards to move tons of cocaine.

      Last year, 13 of the vessels were seized on dry land or stopped at sea by Colombian or U.S. patrol boats, more than in the previous 14 years combined, according to the Pacific fleet of the Colombian navy, which is responsible for interdiction efforts across 130,000 square miles.

      Naval officials say they are concerned that many more submarines may have gotten past patrols, especially now that the newest models are faster and feature more seaworthy designs than the first such vessels that Colombian officials discovered in 1993.

      "This enemy is supremely intelligent and has lots of money," explained Adm. Edgar Cely, the navy's chief of operations. "It shows that the narco-traffickers are betting on this method."


      Traffickers' idyll
      This sparsely inhabited sliver of Pacific coastline, where muddy rivers loop into the ocean, has long been a smugglers' paradise. Behind the jagged cliffs that jut into the ocean is a vast jungle, laced with mangrove-fringed coves and virtually thousands of miles of waterways.
      The topography is nearly ideal for transporting the cocaine produced in clandestine laboratories in nearby Narino state, where leftist guerrillas, the remnants of a paramilitary army, and drug traffickers try to outmuscle one another for control.

      In recent years, traffickers have used speedboats, called "go-fasts," that are custom-made from fiberglass and mounted with powerful motors that can take them to nearly 60 m.p.h. But the speedboats create long wakes, easy to spot from the air.

      The new vessels are tougher to pin down. While popularly called submarines, they are, strictly speaking, submersibles. They cannot dive like true submarines. Still, the hull of such boats glides beneath the waves, with only the cockpit and exhaust tubes visible from above.

      Some of the new vessels, with whimsically shaped fins, and ducts and pipes sticking out, bring to mind Capt. Nemo's Nautilus from Jules Verne's imagination. Others are cigar-shaped, narrow and hydrodynamic, not unlike the World War I German U-boats.


      Pricey projects
      Built under the jungle canopy, in camps outfitted with sleeping quarters for workers, the Colombian versions can cost $2 million and take nearly a year to build, said Capt. Gustavo Angel, commander of the 18-vessel flotilla that operates out of the naval base in Bahia Malaga, Colombia's most important on the Pacific.
      "What's most striking is the logistical capacity of these criminals to take all this material into the heart of the jungle, including heavy equipment like propulsion gear and generators,"   said Angel, who has spent years fighting drug traffickers.

      For traffickers, the payoff - reaching Central America, the first stage in a circuitous route to the United States - is well worth the trouble. A 10-ton load can fetch nearly $200 million wholesale on American streets.

      One of the seized vessels on display here has a 450-horsepower diesel engine that could power the craft to North America. At 60 feet in length, it is designed to reach speeds of 111/2 m.p.h. and carry up to 10 tons of cocaine, five times as much as a "go-fast."

      Because it was sheathed in fiberglass, it is virtually impossible to detect via sonar. It also has ballast tanks for balance and a global positioning system for navigation. Officials here have grudging admiration for the engineers who designed the vessels, saying they were built to cut through water seamlessly while withstanding long voyages.

      Still, the submersible, one of three on display, is no Red October. There's no bathroom, no private sleeping quarters - let alone a galley or torpedo room.

      The idea, officials say, was to beach the vessel, unload the cocaine, and split. "The question that is up in the air is how many have gotten out," said Angel.



      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: bluwaters on March 03, 2008, 11:44:19 PM
      Silverfox
      What an interesting and thought provoking post.
      I well remember Reagan's "Star Wars" defence plan.
      Monkey brains are churning and turning tonight!

      To me it is thought-provoking to consider that this operation by the Columbian Government was well planned in advance -- and, that the U.S. Government may actually have been monitoring Venzuela's response from Aruba.  (This is Cheney's style)

      I would also guess that there may well be a U.S. Navy presence in the vicinity by the time of the Columbian military strike took place.  This is another reason I feel the Persistence was relatively safe (like having armed guards within shouting distance).
      I would also guess that this is how Persistence knew when to book it out of there, right as Chavez was sending troops to the border of Columbia.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: AZLady on March 03, 2008, 11:44:47 PM
      Would 240 swings equal 10 days (24 hours x 10 = 10 days)?


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Silverfox on March 03, 2008, 11:45:58 PM
      Silverfox
      What an interesting and thought provoking post.
      I well remember Reagan's "Star Wars" defence plan.
      Monkey brains are churning and turning tonight!

      To me it is thought-provoking to consider that this operation by the Columbian Government was well planned in advance -- and, that the U.S. Government may actually have been monitoring Venzuela's response from Aruba.  (This is Cheney's style)

      I would also guess that there may well be a U.S. Navy presence in the vicinity by the time of the Columbian military strike took place.  This is another reason I feel the Persistence was relatively safe (like having armed guards within shouting distance).
      I would also guess that this is how Persistence knew when to book it out of there, right as Chavez was sending troops to the border of Columbia.


       ::MonkeyCool::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Bladerunner on March 03, 2008, 11:47:45 PM
      Last Updated: Friday, 3 October, 2003, 15:25 GMT 16:25 UK 

      Cocaine washes ashore in Portugal
       
       
      Police have recovered hundreds of kilos of cocaine lying in watertight bags along beaches south of Lisbon.
      The bags began washing ashore on Wednesday evening and more than 400 kilos of the drug have now been found by police and coast guards.

      It may have been jettisoned at sea by smugglers fearing detection or broken loose from underwater moorings.  

      The cocaine, thought to be worth millions of euros, was packed in green bags carrying a Christmas Tree symbol.

      Each bag contained 1.2 kilograms of pure cocaine.

      It was found along beaches stretching some 60 kilometres around the town of Sines.

      The area lies in Alentejo, the country's most sparsely populated province.

      The authorities stepped up patrols in the area in September after noticing suspicious movements of ships.

      Illegal shipments of hashish and tobacco have washed up on local beaches in the past.

      Police with sniffer dogs were still searching the beaches on Friday.



       


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Silverfox on March 03, 2008, 11:50:47 PM
      Last Updated: Friday, 3 October, 2003, 15:25 GMT 16:25 UK 

      Cocaine washes ashore in Portugal
       
       
      Police have recovered hundreds of kilos of cocaine lying in watertight bags along beaches south of Lisbon.
      The bags began washing ashore on Wednesday evening and more than 400 kilos of the drug have now been found by police and coast guards.

      It may have been jettisoned at sea by smugglers fearing detection or broken loose from underwater moorings.  

      The cocaine, thought to be worth millions of euros, was packed in green bags carrying a Christmas Tree symbol.

      Each bag contained 1.2 kilograms of pure cocaine.

      It was found along beaches stretching some 60 kilometres around the town of Sines.

      The area lies in Alentejo, the country's most sparsely populated province.

      The authorities stepped up patrols in the area in September after noticing suspicious movements of ships.

      Illegal shipments of hashish and tobacco have washed up on local beaches in the past.

      Police with sniffer dogs were still searching the beaches on Friday.



       


      Imagine that... ::MonkeyCool::



      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Observer on March 03, 2008, 11:51:24 PM
      Would 240 swings equal 10 days (240 hours divided by 24= 10 days)?
      That would be my guess since he said hour pendelum. He probably speaks 3-4 languages but still talks in code  ::MonkeyConfused:: ..I guess you have to think like shango to break shango  ::MonkeyTongue::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: bluwaters on March 03, 2008, 11:51:32 PM
      Growing up on the coast of Florida, I do remember that every so often "square grouper" would wash up on the beach.  ::MonkeyCool::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Bladerunner on March 03, 2008, 11:52:40 PM
      I remember there was some speculation that utilizing underwater methods to traffic drugs was impractical, however, this appears to not be the case at all. The logistical capabilites of the smugglers is very sophisticated, particularly if you realize they are using semi-submersibles, GPS, etc, to move their product. Couple that with the fact that the money involved is mind boggling, and one can only conclude that if you are told to dive down and secure the cocaine, then that is what one indeed does!


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: jackb on March 03, 2008, 11:53:29 PM
      I wish I were organized like Janet....but I am not.
      I think it was on his my space or the one with the bloody
      bathtub pictures.  I'll bet Klaas remembers.

      It was on Val's myspace.  The bloody bathtub pic was on one of Joran's friends sites I think (not Vals).

      Thank you, Klaas.....I thought it was one of the two.
      That is what always made me think of the baseball bat.
        That would be interesting to have.  Anyone got it?  The Val's my space thing and saying.      j/b

      Jackb - it was so early in the case most of us (me in particular) didn't even think to save it.  Since then of course that Myspace is long gone and he's started a new one.

      I have a pic of what looked like a short-haired dark headed girl in the one I have that appears to have blood in it, but it is on outside storage.  Never studied it much at the time.  Just holding it.  May get back to that later, but as for Val saying that, now that would be interesting.   j/b


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: texasmom on March 03, 2008, 11:53:31 PM
      Hi all,

      Well it is not over till Natalee is send home.

      XTC DNA area may hold many mystery...
      The parked Hour Pendulum is now set in motion.
      Several Guillotine are being sharpen.
      when the Hour Pendulum reach 240 swing the auto Guillotine will fall.
      the foundation of babylon will be shake.

      To be continue..

      Lala, What is 240 swings of the Hour Pendalum?.

      I knew it!!  Caps is really Shango! LOL  Just kidding.  What is really scary is I actually think I understand him.  ::MonkeyShocked::

      I'm not sure Lala's saw this Magnolia, my thoughts are that it means 10 days.  I've not had as much Shango unleashed as Lala's has though, so I will bow to her interpretation if she does not agree.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Bladerunner on March 03, 2008, 11:55:00 PM
      Last Updated: Friday, 3 October, 2003, 15:25 GMT 16:25 UK 

      Cocaine washes ashore in Portugal
       
       
      Police have recovered hundreds of kilos of cocaine lying in watertight bags along beaches south of Lisbon.
      The bags began washing ashore on Wednesday evening and more than 400 kilos of the drug have now been found by police and coast guards.

      It may have been jettisoned at sea by smugglers fearing detection or broken loose from underwater moorings.  

      The cocaine, thought to be worth millions of euros, was packed in green bags carrying a Christmas Tree symbol.
      .
      .
      .



      Imagine that... ::MonkeyCool::



      Merry Friggin Xmas!! ::MonkeyDance::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: bluwaters on March 03, 2008, 11:55:11 PM
      Bladerunner

      A+ for research tonight!
      I never heard of those fast submersibles before.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: martini on March 03, 2008, 11:58:42 PM
      BEIJING, China (Reuters)-China could be the near monopoly buyer of Venezuelan fuel oil after Beijing stepped up financial aid to cash-strapped Caracas, but it will be years before higher volumes of crude from the OPEC member begins flowing East.

       
      Venezuela is struggling with multiple problems including a cash crunch caused by President Hugo Chavez's use of oil money to fund socialist projects, surplus fuel oil due to refinery outages and must seek alternative buyers for the crude it stopped shipping to Exxon Mobil Corp (XOM.N: Quote, Profile, Research) due to a legal row.

       
      In an unprecedented move to ease its cash squeeze, state-run PDVSA had asked for $1 billion upfront payment in a tender to sell eight fuel oil cargoes of 1.8 million barrels each. The tender was scrapped when potential buyers balked, but PDVSA is still holding talks with PetroChina (0857.HK: Quote, Profile, Research), traders said.

       
      If a deal comes through, it would mean China soaking up nearly all the Venezuelan fuel oil exports to Asia and raise term imports by the world's second-largest oil consumer by a further 20 percent over a year, traders said.

       
      "If prices are really attractive, yes, we do have the appetite to take more fuel oil. But that also means PDVSA cutting back supplies to other buyers as that is about all they can export," said a PetroChina trading manager, who declined to be named.

       
      China, which is keen to secure long-term supplies to meet its surging demand, has more than doubled liftings of Venezuelan fuel oil, a heavy residue used to power ships and make road-paving bitumen, since fourth-quarter 2007.

       
      The increased supply, now at 5.5-7.3 million barrels a month, started around the same time as Beijing-backed China Development Bank granted Caracas a $4 billion loan for which PDVSA said it would repay in fuel oil.

       
      PetroChina, China's main proxy in energy deals with the Latin American nation, also aims to raise crude oil imports from Venezuela by a quarter or more this year to at least 100,000 bpd.

       
      The combined supply of fuel oil and crude would be near Chavez's promise to supply China 350,000 bpd by the end of this year, roughly 5 percent of China's total oil demand.

       
      Victor Shum, of Purvin & Gertz, said it would be economic suicide if Caracas were to significantly shift away its crude supply from the United States now, as China did not yet have the capability to refine its highly acidic and high-metal oil.

       
      The US buys most of Venezuela's exports to meet around 11 percent of its daily imports, but relations have been prickly and Chavez early this month halted oil sales to Exxon Mobil. The top US firm recently won court orders freezing up to $12 billion in Venezuelan assets to ensure compensation for an oil project Chavez nationalized last year.

       
      But Beijing and Caracas have the political and commercial drive to push forward Chavez's pledge in November to boost supply to China to 1 million bpd by around 2011, or 13 percent of current Chinese oil demand.

       
      "China wants to diversify sources of supply. Venezuela is a partner with open arms," Shum said.

       
      "We are going to see more investments in the coming years, such as a joint venture refinery in China, for Venezuela to increase crude exports significantly," he added



      http://www.avsnewsonline.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1699&Itemid=82


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Magnolia on March 03, 2008, 11:58:52 PM
      Hi all,

      Well it is not over till Natalee is send home.

      XTC DNA area may hold many mystery...
      The parked Hour Pendulum is now set in motion.
      Several Guillotine are being sharpen.
      when the Hour Pendulum reach 240 swing the auto Guillotine will fall.
      the foundation of babylon will be shake.

      To be continue..

      Lala, What is 240 swings of the Hour Pendalum?.

      I knew it!!  Caps is really Shango! LOL  Just kidding.  What is really scary is I actually think I understand him.  ::MonkeyShocked::

      I'm not sure Lala's saw this Magnolia, my thoughts are that it means 10 days.  I've not had as much Shango unleashed as Lala's has though, so I will bow to her interpretation if she does not agree.

      It scared me....I thought it meant 240 days and that seems so long.
      I like 10 days much better.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: jackb on March 04, 2008, 12:02:04 AM
      thumbs-down: an act, instance, or sign of disapproval, a hand signal, interpreted to be negative, which consists of a fist, sideways, with the thumb pointing to the ground, below satisfactory or unacceptable.

      When Roman gladiators received the thumbs down signal, it meant that a he was to live. It signified that the guards were to put their swords into the ground.

      PERSISTENCE: This is the companion word to "patience." Both are firm requirements in dealing with people from other societies around the world. http://www.csupomona.edu/~tassi/gestures.htm

      By their fruits (and hand gestures) ye shall know them...

      Note to K~ you are one cool dude...if only I was 20 years younger.
      Please take my post with a grain of salt. Thanks for all you do, Martini

        Wouldn't that depend if the divers were downside up or upside down giving the signal meaning the picture was not flipped.   j/b


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Observer on March 04, 2008, 12:02:05 AM
      Growing up on the coast of Florida, I do remember that every so often "square grouper" would wash up on the beach.  ::MonkeyCool::
      I once ran into a very large Grouper while diving and he showed me his teeth. I then swam the other way  ::MonkeyCool::

      As far as China and Venezuela goes..Of Course!!! They are trying to play monopoly wherever they can in the world... We have got to find a new fuel source and fast! :(



      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: bluwaters on March 04, 2008, 12:06:12 AM
      Sweet monkey dreams to all.
      May visions of square grouper dance in monkey heads.
      (http://i92.photobucket.com/albums/l28/TallyAnna/smilies/smiliehippy.gif)


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Magnolia on March 04, 2008, 12:07:56 AM
      I think a Wever is the other man involved in the
      arrest with Farro in Florida.
      Wever, the minister of health, was arrested in a house of prostitution in Venezuela.

      Isn't it Booshi or David who is the Health Minister.
      That is who was at the Ho house and got into a fight
      and left without paying his bill.

      Rules in Aruba say that you can't be a minister if you carry
      on like a wayward son.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: texasmom on March 04, 2008, 12:09:53 AM
      Would 240 swings equal 10 days (240 hours divided by 24= 10 days)?
      That would be my guess since he said hour pendelum. He probably speaks 3-4 languages but still talks in code  ::MonkeyConfused:: ..I guess you have to think like shango to break shango  ::MonkeyTongue::
      That was my guess too, I didn't see this before...whew..I'm relieved!!!  I used the same reasoning based on "hour" pendulum.   


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Observer on March 04, 2008, 12:12:09 AM
      I think a Wever is the other man involved in the
      arrest with Farro in Florida.
      Wever, the minister of health, was arrested in a house of prostitution in Venezuela.

      Isn't it Booshi or David who is the Health Minister.
      That is who was at the Ho house and got into a fight
      and left without paying his bill.

      Rules in Aruba say that you can't be a minister if you carry
      on like a wayward son.

      I have never heard anything about Booshi or a David being in trouble but there are a ton of Wevers in Aruba...I know Candelerio Wever got popped in Venezuela with a large amount of coke and 250k in cash which he used to buy his Freedom. I believe Robert Wever chairman of the ISA and into politics in Aruba is Guido's Father. I noticed Caps said RC as well...To me those initials are the evil one  :wink:


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: texasmom on March 04, 2008, 12:13:47 AM
      Sweet monkey dreams to all.
      May visions of square grouper dance in monkey heads.
      (http://i92.photobucket.com/albums/l28/TallyAnna/smilies/smiliehippy.gif)

      goodnight bluwaters!  love your smileys!  ::MonkeyHaHa::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Bladerunner on March 04, 2008, 12:15:39 AM
      Last Updated: Friday, 3 October, 2003, 15:25 GMT 16:25 UK 

      Cocaine washes ashore in Portugal
       
       
      Police have recovered hundreds of kilos of cocaine lying in watertight bags along beaches south of Lisbon.
      The bags began washing ashore on Wednesday evening and more than 400 kilos of the drug have now been found by police and coast guards.

      It may have been jettisoned at sea by smugglers fearing detection or broken loose from underwater moorings.  

      The cocaine, thought to be worth millions of euros, was packed in green bags carrying a Christmas Tree symbol.

      Each bag contained 1.2 kilograms of pure cocaine.

      It was found along beaches stretching some 60 kilometres around the town of Sines.

      The area lies in Alentejo, the country's most sparsely populated province.

      The authorities stepped up patrols in the area in September after noticing suspicious movements of ships.

      Illegal shipments of hashish and tobacco have washed up on local beaches in the past.

      Police with sniffer dogs were still searching the beaches on Friday.



       


      YouTube video on sub-marine drug trafficing out of Colombia--shows a $250M drug bust!!
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KdI1y4sdPZE


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: jackb on March 04, 2008, 12:16:15 AM
      Silverfox

      Post of the Day


      Just one thing though related to the premise that Persistence had accidently mapped a post office network: Given your hypothesis that this post office network could help bring down Chavez, and the fact that it was well known the ship was using sophisticated sonar off Aruba, don't you think that the ship would have been "intercepted" in some way in order for that information to never be collected?

      That is why it is good to have the best operatives in these places, because they can inform the WH about what is going to go down and it would have to be proven to Persist.,they were in danger,  ie the VP plane around, etc.  Don't you recon?
      J/b



      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: klaasend on March 04, 2008, 12:16:23 AM
      I think a Wever is the other man involved in the
      arrest with Farro in Florida.
      Wever, the minister of health, was arrested in a house of prostitution in Venezuela.

      Isn't it Booshi or David who is the Health Minister.
      That is who was at the Ho house and got into a fight
      and left without paying his bill.

      Rules in Aruba say that you can't be a minister if you carry
      on like a wayward son.

      Booshi Wever

      (http://antilliaans.caribiana.nl/images/assets/11882717)


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: texasmom on March 04, 2008, 12:20:27 AM
      Hi all,

      Well it is not over till Natalee is send home.

      XTC DNA area may hold many mystery...
      The parked Hour Pendulum is now set in motion.
      Several Guillotine are being sharpen.
      when the Hour Pendulum reach 240 swing the auto Guillotine will fall.
      the foundation of babylon will be shake.

      To be continue..

      Lala, What is 240 swings of the Hour Pendalum?.

      I knew it!!  Caps is really Shango! LOL  Just kidding.  What is really scary is I actually think I understand him.  ::MonkeyShocked::

      I'm not sure Lala's saw this Magnolia, my thoughts are that it means 10 days.  I've not had as much Shango unleashed as Lala's has though, so I will bow to her interpretation if she does not agree.

      It scared me....I thought it meant 240 days and that seems so long.
      I like 10 days much better.
      me too, I hope we're right!  ::MonkeyCool::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: klaasend on March 04, 2008, 12:21:04 AM
      Bladerunner - nice find!


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: AZLady on March 04, 2008, 12:24:18 AM
      Candelaria "Booshi" Wever is the Minister of Immigration, MEP.  Apparently, he and Rudy Croes do not get along well.  http://scaredmonkeys.com/2006/06/16/amigoe-rudy-croes-angry-with-wever-due-to-dimas-the-discontent-in-aruba-continues/

      Candelaria "Booshi" Wever has been accused of being drunk and fighting in a strip club in Punto Fijo, Venezuela.  Diario published an article exposing this and was promptly sued by Minister Wever.  http://scaredmonkeys.com/2006/08/31/aruba-minister-booshi-wever-%E2%80%98if-i-loose-the-case-i-will-step-down%E2%80%99-minister-wever-denies-having-been-in-a-strip-club-that-night/

      Another Diario article:

      Diario 01/09/2007:

      http://www.diario-aruba.com/2007/1/9/

      He reportedly paid 250 thousand dollars for his liberty in Venezuela. CANDELARIO WEVER CAUGHT WITH 3 AND A HALF KILO’S OF COCAINE AND 250 THOUSAND DOLLARS.

      ORANJESTAD (AAN) — For a few months now there have been strong rumors circulating that a person from Aruba would have been arrested in the exterior / a foreign country where he would have been found with lots of thousands of dollars and also a few kilo’s of an illegal substance, drugs.

      Because this information kept circulating and ”persisting” and there was a lot of speculation regarding who would be involved, some figuring out and investigations had to have been done to find out in which country of the region the Aruban in question had been detained and what he had in his possesion that got him in trouble with the law.

      After a few months a name began circulating and that’s also why questions were asked regarding a certain Candelario Wever of Aruba who would’ve been involved.

      This is about a Candelario Wever who had been caught with a few hundred thousands dollars and a few kilo’s of cocaine, but how many Candelario Wever’s are there on Aruba and who was this Candelario Wever who supposedly works as an adviser or assistant at a certain government department?

      After intense investigation, foreign documents arrived on which reads a serious case of bribery in which this Candelario Wever of Aruba was involved.

      Like the readers can read today on these foreign documents, it is apparent on October 15th 2006 in Venezuela, two police officers caught three people, Macho, Hector and a Candelario Wever whom were in possesion of 3 and a half kilo’s of cocaine.

      According to these documents, the Candelario Wever of Dutch nationality, identified himself with documents, as Assistant Adviser of the Minister of Health in Aruba (in this document it says ”Araba” but this must be ”Aruba”).

      The two other persons would’ve remained in custody while the Candelario Wever would have managed to free himself with 250,000 Dollars!!!

      A criminal investigation is reportedly being done against the two police officers in Venezuela for accusations of bribery, violation of rules of the deparment of justice and also they are reportedly under investigation for extortion.

      This is a very serious case and the moment has come when light must be shed on who this certain Candelario Wever is who has identified himself in Venezuela as Assistant Adviser of the Minister of Health of Aruba, when he was caught together with the other two persons with three and a half kilo’s of cocaine and 250,000 dollars.

      In Aruba everybody knows a Candelario Wever, whom is Booshi Wever, but as minister and not as any kind of assistand to the Ministry of Health and that’s also why this deal must be clarified, whether there are people misusing names of government employees or officials of Aruba and so putting both the government of Aruba as the minister in charge of the ministry of health in a negative light.

      Because the case took place in a country outside the kingdom of the netherlands where a dutch citizen was detained related to three and a half kilo’s of cocaine and also 250,000 US dollars, the department of external relations of The Netherlands will have to do an investigation to figure out whom this Dutchman carrying the name Candelario Wever is and how he could’ve gotten his liberty with 250,000 dollars and where this money could’ve come from.

      It is not known whether authorities in Venezuela alerted Dutch Authorities about this case or if they are going to seek the arrest of this Candelario Wever, who presented himself as a government official of Aruba, via Interpol.



      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: klaasend on March 04, 2008, 12:25:53 AM
      http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/915059.stm

      Thursday, 7 September, 2000, 18:40 GMT 19:40 UK
      Drug submarine found in Colombia



      Police say the workmanship is of high quality

      Police in Colombia say they have found a half-built submarine in a warehouse in a suburb of the capital Bogota.
      Police chief General Luis Ernesto Gilibert said Russian documents were found alongside the partially-completed vessel.



      This is huge - we're talking about being able to load up to 200 tonnes of cocaine in this submarine
       
      US Drug Enforcement Agency 
      He said the 30 metre (100ft) vessel would have been capable of carrying huge quantities of cocaine or heroin.

      He speculated that, once completed, the submarine would have been disassembled and taken by lorry to to Colombia's Pacific or Caribbean coast.

      When police raided the warehouse in the suburb of Facatativa they found the building equipped with closed-circuit cameras but devoid of people.

      High quality

      Instead there was the startling sight of a sophisticated submarine under construction.

      "It was between 30% and 40% complete and had its engine room ready," General Gilibert said.

      "The technology is advanced and the workmanship of high quality."



      The sub was nearly half complete
       
      The Russian documents at the site led police to speculate that the Russian mafia or Russian technicians were involved in its construction.

      Bogota is landlocked and lies 2,250 metres (7,500 ft) above sea level, but is a source of high-quality building materials - which may explain why it was chosen as a submarine boatyard.

      Submarines have been used by Columbian drug smugglers before - in 1997 two mini-subs were seized off the Caribbean port of Santa Marta.

      Huge

      But this submarine is a much bigger vessel.

      "In 32 years I've never seen anything like this," said Leo Arreguin, the US Drug Enforcement Administration director in Colombia.

      "This is huge. We're talking about being able to load up to 200 tonnes of cocaine in this submarine."

      Mr Arreguin said documents discovered at the site showed that two Americans may also have been involved, but did not elaborate.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Observer on March 04, 2008, 12:28:04 AM
      Silverfox

      Post of the Day

      That is why it is good to have the best operatives in these places, because they can inform the WH about what is going to go down and it would have to be proven to Persist.,they were in danger,  ie the VP plane around, etc.  Don't you recon?
      J/b



      We have spent enormous amounts of money in the fight against drugs in colombia and our intelligence is excellent. They are even more of a Allie now because of the emergence of this madman Chavez. However if the Persistence was in danger of any kind AF2 wouldn't be landing in Aruba but a f16 would. AF2 landing has to be for diplomatic reasons and precautionary measures if something did happen.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: CapsLockWizard on March 04, 2008, 12:29:29 AM
      Silverfox

      Post of the Day


      Just one thing though related to the premise that Persistence had accidently mapped a post office network: Given your hypothesis that this post office network could help bring down Chavez, and the fact that it was well known the ship was using sophisticated sonar off Aruba, don't you think that the ship would have been "intercepted" in some way in order for that information to never be collected?

      That traget is where the panter also park. Handiscap sign says no parking. The parking spot was left open.

      The scanner boat parket in a handicap space and thats what happend.

      Also the VIP plane is in AUA Driveway but VIP took normal plane to COL. plane safe in Garage AUA



      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: carpe noctem on March 04, 2008, 12:32:23 AM
      Well, here's certainly some wonderful news.  Bet Carpe can capture it for us, too!



      http://www.telegraaf.nl/binnenland/3456742/_Moeder_Natalee__te_gast_bij_Jensen__.html?p=1,2
       
      Moeder Natalee Holloway te gast bij Jensen

      HILVERSUM - Beth Twitty, de moeder van op de Aruba verdwenen tiener Natalee Holloway, is dinsdagavond te gast in het televisieprogramma Jensen!. Voor het eerst na de spraakmakende uitzending van Peter R. de Vries geeft ze op de Nederlandse televisie haar reactie op de bekentenissen van Joran van der Sloot, aldus RTL maandag.

      Beth Twitty the mother of missing teenager Natalee Holloway. will be Tuesday as guest in TV show Jensen. For the first time after the show from Peter R. de Vries she gives to  Dutch TV a reaction to the confession from Joran van der Sloot, said RTL monday.


      Tegen presentator Robert Jensen vertelt ze over de schadeclaim die ze gaat indien bij Joran van der Sloot wegens de emotionele schade die ze heeft geleden. Ook gaat ze in op de gebeurtenissen nadat de mediagekte losbarstte en de zoektocht naar haar dochter, die op 30 mei 2005 verdween.

      She wukk talk to announcer Robert Jensen about the civil lawsuit against Joran van der Sloot, what he has done emotionally to her. Also she will be talking about the media that is following the case and about the search to her daughter, that was missing on May 30, 2005.


      --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Het beste van Windows, nu ook online. Deel jouw wereld met Windows Live. Download nu.



      I have my eyeball on it, Anna. Thanks for the heads up!

      > Coming soon to a YOU TUBE screen near you!


       ::MonkeyEek::
       ::MonkeyConfused::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: CapsLockWizard on March 04, 2008, 12:35:04 AM
      Last Updated: Friday, 3 October, 2003, 15:25 GMT 16:25 UK 

      Cocaine washes ashore in Portugal
       
       
      Police have recovered hundreds of kilos of cocaine lying in watertight bags along beaches south of Lisbon.
      The bags began washing ashore on Wednesday evening and more than 400 kilos of the drug have now been found by police and coast guards.

      It may have been jettisoned at sea by smugglers fearing detection or broken loose from underwater moorings.  

      The cocaine, thought to be worth millions of euros, was packed in green bags carrying a Christmas Tree symbol.

      Each bag contained 1.2 kilograms of pure cocaine.

      It was found along beaches stretching some 60 kilometres around the town of Sines.

      The area lies in Alentejo, the country's most sparsely populated province.

      The authorities stepped up patrols in the area in September after noticing suspicious movements of ships.

      Illegal shipments of hashish and tobacco have washed up on local beaches in the past.

      Police with sniffer dogs were still searching the beaches on Friday.



       


      Imagine that... ::MonkeyCool::


      Now they have to put a hold on the investment plans...A new Key is needed


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Silverfox on March 04, 2008, 12:35:34 AM
      Silverfox

      Post of the Day


      Just one thing though related to the premise that Persistence had accidently mapped a post office network: Given your hypothesis that this post office network could help bring down Chavez, and the fact that it was well known the ship was using sophisticated sonar off Aruba, don't you think that the ship would have been "intercepted" in some way in order for that information to never be collected?

      That traget is where the panter also park. Handiscap sign says no parking. The parking spot was left open.

      The scanner boat parket in a handicap space and thats what happend.

      Also the VIP plane is in AUA Driveway but VIP took normal plane to COL. plane safe in Garage AUA



      What was once a fuzzy picture of these events now becomes so much more focused.  Obviously lots of "top level" operations going on... ::MonkeyCool::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: hotping on March 04, 2008, 12:35:34 AM
      Thanks Carpe You're the Best!  ::MonkeyWink:: ::MonkeyDance::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: cubbeegirl on March 04, 2008, 12:37:57 AM
      Thanks Carpe You're the Best!  ::MonkeyWink:: ::MonkeyDance::


      Ain't that the truth.... I don't even worry about dvr anymore cause I know Carpe is gonna post it ....

      Thanks Carpe!


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Bearlyhere on March 04, 2008, 12:42:06 AM
      Last Updated: Friday, 3 October, 2003, 15:25 GMT 16:25 UK 

      Cocaine washes ashore in Portugal
       
       
      Police have recovered hundreds of kilos of cocaine lying in watertight bags along beaches south of Lisbon.
      The bags began washing ashore on Wednesday evening and more than 400 kilos of the drug have now been found by police and coast guards.

      It may have been jettisoned at sea by smugglers fearing detection or broken loose from underwater moorings.  

      The cocaine, thought to be worth millions of euros, was packed in green bags carrying a Christmas Tree symbol.

      Each bag contained 1.2 kilograms of pure cocaine.

      It was found along beaches stretching some 60 kilometres around the town of Sines.

      The area lies in Alentejo, the country's most sparsely populated province.

      The authorities stepped up patrols in the area in September after noticing suspicious movements of ships.

      Illegal shipments of hashish and tobacco have washed up on local beaches in the past.

      Police with sniffer dogs were still searching the beaches on Friday.



       


      Imagine that... ::MonkeyCool::



      Hell, I better watch myself the next time I'm thirsty and ask for some Coke on the beach.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Observer on March 04, 2008, 12:42:46 AM
      Even people with just a tiny part of the action are millionaires and live like Kings in Aruba and elsewhere from the Cocaine trade. It is enormous and the cocaine primarily comes from one part of the World. Remember in the 80's one of the richest guys in the World was Pablo Escobar.

      (http://i198.photobucket.com/albums/aa118/Observer00000007/DrugLordHouse.jpg)



      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: cubbeegirl on March 04, 2008, 12:43:28 AM
      Last Updated: Friday, 3 October, 2003, 15:25 GMT 16:25 UK 

      Cocaine washes ashore in Portugal
       
       
      Police have recovered hundreds of kilos of cocaine lying in watertight bags along beaches south of Lisbon.
      The bags began washing ashore on Wednesday evening and more than 400 kilos of the drug have now been found by police and coast guards.

      It may have been jettisoned at sea by smugglers fearing detection or broken loose from underwater moorings.  

      The cocaine, thought to be worth millions of euros, was packed in green bags carrying a Christmas Tree symbol.

      Each bag contained 1.2 kilograms of pure cocaine.

      It was found along beaches stretching some 60 kilometres around the town of Sines.

      The area lies in Alentejo, the country's most sparsely populated province.

      The authorities stepped up patrols in the area in September after noticing suspicious movements of ships.

      Illegal shipments of hashish and tobacco have washed up on local beaches in the past.

      Police with sniffer dogs were still searching the beaches on Friday.



       


      Imagine that... ::MonkeyCool::



      Hell, I better watch myself the next time I'm thirsty and ask for some Coke on the beach.


      LMAO.... ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: pinkbanana on March 04, 2008, 12:43:59 AM
      Finally caught up and now I need a break ::MonkeyConfused::...nite Monkeys!!

      d


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: texasmom on March 04, 2008, 12:45:38 AM


      Goodnight everyone!


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: hotping on March 04, 2008, 12:47:26 AM
      Good Night TM and Pinkbanana!


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Lala'sMom on March 04, 2008, 12:47:30 AM
      Hi all,

      Well it is not over till Natalee is send home.

      XTC DNA area may hold many mystery...
      The parked Hour Pendulum is now set in motion.
      Several Guillotine are being sharpen.
      when the Hour Pendulum reach 240 swing the auto Guillotine will fall.
      the foundation of babylon will be shake.

      To be continue..

      Lala, What is 240 swings of the Hour Pendalum?.

      I knew it!!  Caps is really Shango! LOL  Just kidding.  What is really scary is I actually think I understand him.  ::MonkeyShocked::

      I'm not sure Lala's saw this Magnolia, my thoughts are that it means 10 days.  I've not had as much Shango unleashed as Lala's has though, so I will bow to her interpretation if she does not agree.

      Yes, I think 10 days for things to play out is how I understand it...we will just have to be patient and wait and see what happens.  I am doing graduate studies now in Shango.  It is really hard but I am sure I can ace my exams.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: hotping on March 04, 2008, 12:50:01 AM
      I bet You Can Lala's!  ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyWink:: ::MonkeyDance::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: martini on March 04, 2008, 12:50:42 AM
      Silverfox

      Post of the Day


      Just one thing though related to the premise that Persistence had accidently mapped a post office network: Given your hypothesis that this post office network could help bring down Chavez, and the fact that it was well known the ship was using sophisticated sonar off Aruba, don't you think that the ship would have been "intercepted" in some way in order for that information to never be collected?

      That traget is where the panter also park. Handiscap sign says no parking. The parking spot was left open.

      The scanner boat parket in a handicap space and thats what happend.

      Also the VIP plane is in AUA Driveway but VIP took normal plane to COL. plane safe in Garage AUA



      I will agree...
      There was one time I parked in a handicap space and there was No sign saying no parking.
      Well, I went to court and said "look judge I got myself some pics here of this so called handicap parking space and there ain't no sign saying no parking here, and beside that it was snowing that day and no one could see the markins on the ground, either."
      I got myself out of that ticket, but there are much higher stakes here, my friend. this is out of our hands. All we can do now is pray and wait.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Lala'sMom on March 04, 2008, 12:53:46 AM
      Silverfox

      Post of the Day


      Just one thing though related to the premise that Persistence had accidently mapped a post office network: Given your hypothesis that this post office network could help bring down Chavez, and the fact that it was well known the ship was using sophisticated sonar off Aruba, don't you think that the ship would have been "intercepted" in some way in order for that information to never be collected?

      That traget is where the panter also park. Handiscap sign says no parking. The parking spot was left open.

      The scanner boat parket in a handicap space and thats what happend.

      Also the VIP plane is in AUA Driveway but VIP took normal plane to COL. plane safe in Garage AUA



      Just an aside for all you tangoers...Checkme loved to use the term AUA in his/her posts.  We finally determined that be the term for Aruba's airport several weeks ago and then concluded that Checkme was most likely a worker at the airport.  Just a little FYI to those that do not venture to the Shango thread very often.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Observer on March 04, 2008, 12:54:06 AM
      Despite the three leaders' brinkmanship and the risk of military missteps, political analysts said a conflict was unlikely on borders that stretch from parched desert through Andean mountains and jungles to the Pacific Ocean.

      Chavez, the leader of a growing bloc of Latin American leftist leaders, may win points with supporters by challenging Uribe. But experts say he can ill afford to lose food imports from Colombia just as he tries to combat chronic food shortages in his OPEC nation.

      http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080304/ts_nm/venezuela_colombia_dc


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Bearlyhere on March 04, 2008, 12:55:13 AM
      I think a Wever is the other man involved in the
      arrest with Farro in Florida.
      Wever, the minister of health, was arrested in a house of prostitution in Venezuela.
      Isn't it Booshi or David who is the Health Minister.
      That is who was at the Ho house and got into a fight
      and left without paying his bill.

      Rules in Aruba say that you can't be a minister if you carry
      on like a wayward son.

      Unbelievable.  Now we know why Joran couldn't find a condom around.  The minister of health knows better than to visit the ho house without them.

      I have an idea.  Instead of making a list of all those who are corrupt in Aruba, let's make a list of those that aren't.  This way we can save trees and space on the blog.

       :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Bearlyhere on March 04, 2008, 01:34:41 AM
      Two things occurred to me at the same time after my last post.

      One thing everyone agrees on is that Joran is a liar.  As far as I know there isn't anyone, including his attorney that believes otherwise.

      I follow the 'I think thou doth protest too much' in combination with the 'TMI' (too much information) theory.  When Joran lies, one of the things he does is goes on a tangent to tell us why he did a certain thing in the process trying to make himself out as the one wronged or the good guy, the other thing he does (as do his parents) is he does not say yes or no, he starts giving out all this (most times too personal) information.

      Following along those lines, Joran said he didn't have sex that night because he didn't have a condom.  The way I translate that is:

      Joran did not have sex with her (look like a good guy) because he didn't have a condom (TMI-you did or you didn't).  This flags this for me.  Using this theory this tells me he is saying:

      I had sex with her that night and I didn't use a condom.

      He also says he put her in the ocean because he panicked.

      If I think of both of those things at the same time, Joran backs up his reason for disposing of her body in a way that does not give too much information.

      In my theory, it means that Joran not only says it, but he backs it up.  What he actually is saying is:

      I had to dispose of her body because I had sex with her and did not use a condom.
      I'm sorry if this sounds confusing but it makes sense when following my theory and I just can't explain it any better.  For me this is an outright confession if I follow Joran's pattern of talking.

      I hope no one got a headache reading this.  I can't find the right words to explain, but it makes sense in my head and I am not BUI, although after that, I just might need to.







      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Anna on March 04, 2008, 01:40:32 AM
      What am I missing here? 

       ::MonkeyConfused::
      High speed submersibles/submarines/go-fast boats have long been used for transportation of cocaine and would seem much more efficient than putting it in a trap weighing hundreds of pounds in a hundred feet of water. 

      Not the same thing at all to me but what also does drug trade have to do with finding Natalee?  Have to actually see anything done about drug trafficking in the area to believe it.

      Is the idea that Natalee was disposed of by drug traffickers?   ::MonkeyShocked::

      What about Daury/Daddy?

      Not following the relevance of any of this but nothing about this disappearance has ever made sense anyway.


       ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyConfused::

      Guess I'll just have to wait 240 pendulum swings and see.

      Why do I find myself in the Twilight Zone all the time lately?

       ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyNoNo:: ::MonkeyConfused::



      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: hotping on March 04, 2008, 01:43:33 AM
      You're Not Alone Anna I'm right There with Ya....In The Twilight Zone!  ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyShocked::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: klaasend on March 04, 2008, 01:45:18 AM
      What am I missing here? 

       ::MonkeyConfused::
      High speed submersibles/submarines/go-fast boats have long been used for transportation of cocaine and would seem much more efficient than putting it in a trap weighing hundreds of pounds in a hundred feet of water. 

      Not the same thing at all to me but what also does drug trade have to do with finding Natalee?  Have to actually see anything done about drug trafficking in the area to believe it.

      Is the idea that Natalee was disposed of by drug traffickers?   ::MonkeyShocked::

      What about Daury/Daddy?

      Not following the relevance of any of this but nothing about this disappearance has ever made sense anyway.


       ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyConfused::

      Guess I'll just have to wait 240 pendulum swings and see.

      Why do I find myself in the Twilight Zone all the time lately?

       ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyNoNo:: ::MonkeyConfused::



      Trap is in fairly shallow waters.  Trap is a "post office" of sorts for drug drops offs from Columbia or wherever.  Boat or sub with drugs, diver puts drugs in trap...another boat, when it's safe retrieves the drugs. 

      The relivence is the corruption in Aruba.  This could be what makes the walls of Babylon tumble.  Once that happens we may know what happened to Natalee.. 


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Anna on March 04, 2008, 01:48:36 AM
      Bearly,
      Makes as much sense as anything else has lately.  I agree that Joran gets personal and graphic in an attempt to make himself believable, at least it does in his own mind.  He also parrots things his parents have told him like not to have sex without a condom in an further attempt to convince them he is telling the truth.  Plays them like a violin.

      jmo

      I guess I'm just not one for the grand conspiracies involving everybody on the island.  For me, it's still a very simple crime committed by a garden variety punk.  Joran and Paulus did it.

      As Frank used to say No Sloot, No Justice.  I still adhere to that line of thought.

      Getting a headache, too.  Maybe BUI is the way to go after all.

       ::MonkeyHaHa::



      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: hotping on March 04, 2008, 01:55:37 AM
      What am I missing here? 

       ::MonkeyConfused::
      High speed submersibles/submarines/go-fast boats have long been used for transportation of cocaine and would seem much more efficient than putting it in a trap weighing hundreds of pounds in a hundred feet of water. 

      Not the same thing at all to me but what also does drug trade have to do with finding Natalee?  Have to actually see anything done about drug trafficking in the area to believe it.

      Is the idea that Natalee was disposed of by drug traffickers?   ::MonkeyShocked::

      What about Daury/Daddy?

      Not following the relevance of any of this but nothing about this disappearance has ever made sense anyway.


       ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyConfused::

      Guess I'll just have to wait 240 pendulum swings and see.

      Why do I find myself in the Twilight Zone all the time lately?

       ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyNoNo:: ::MonkeyConfused::



      Trap is in fairly shallow waters.  Trap is a "post office" of sorts for drug drops offs from Columbia or wherever.  Boat or sub with drugs, diver puts drugs in trap...another boat, when it's safe retrieves the drugs. 

      The relivence is the corruption in Aruba.  This could be what makes the walls of Babylon tumble.  Once that happens we may know what happened to Natalee.. 
      OK....I'll Buy that! Thanks Klaas!  ::MonkeyWink::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: klaasend on March 04, 2008, 01:56:47 AM
      Bearly,
      Makes as much sense as anything else has lately.  I agree that Joran gets personal and graphic in an attempt to make himself believable, at least it does in his own mind.  He also parrots things his parents have told him like not to have sex without a condom in an further attempt to convince them he is telling the truth.  Plays them like a violin.

      jmo

      I guess I'm just not one for the grand conspiracies involving everybody on the island.  For me, it's still a very simple crime committed by a garden variety punk.  Joran and Paulus did it.

      As Frank used to say No Sloot, No Justice.  I still adhere to that line of thought.

      Getting a headache, too.  Maybe BUI is the way to go after all.

       ::MonkeyHaHa::



      Anna - I agree the initial crime itself was simple.  It's the ensuing coverup and the reasons for it that are complicated. 


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: martini on March 04, 2008, 01:57:18 AM
      What am I missing here? 

       ::MonkeyConfused::
      High speed submersibles/submarines/go-fast boats have long been used for transportation of cocaine and would seem much more efficient than putting it in a trap weighing hundreds of pounds in a hundred feet of water. 

      Not the same thing at all to me but what also does drug trade have to do with finding Natalee?  Have to actually see anything done about drug trafficking in the area to believe it.

      Is the idea that Natalee was disposed of by drug traffickers?   ::MonkeyShocked::

      What about Daury/Daddy?

      Not following the relevance of any of this but nothing about this disappearance has ever made sense anyway.


       ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyConfused::

      Guess I'll just have to wait 240 pendulum swings and see.

      Why do I find myself in the Twilight Zone all the time lately?

       ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyNoNo:: ::MonkeyConfused::



      I agree...

      The recent findings have nothing to do with the Holloway case.

      There is drug trafficing in the Caribbean and what I believe is that the Natalee Case
      interfered with it. IMO.

      I also believe if Beth did not arrive on the Island when she did, Natalee's body would have been handled differently.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Destiny on March 04, 2008, 02:01:17 AM
      Two things occurred to me at the same time after my last post.

      One thing everyone agrees on is that Joran is a liar.  As far as I know there isn't anyone, including his attorney that believes otherwise.

      I follow the 'I think thou doth protest too much' in combination with the 'TMI' (too much information) theory.  When Joran lies, one of the things he does is goes on a tangent to tell us why he did a certain thing in the process trying to make himself out as the one wronged or the good guy, the other thing he does (as do his parents) is he does not say yes or no, he starts giving out all this (most times too personal) information.

      Following along those lines, Joran said he didn't have sex that night because he didn't have a condom.  The way I translate that is:

      Joran did not have sex with her (look like a good guy) because he didn't have a condom (TMI-you did or you didn't).  This flags this for me.  Using this theory this tells me he is saying:

      I had sex with her that night and I didn't use a condom.

      He also says he put her in the ocean because he panicked.

      If I think of both of those things at the same time, Joran backs up his reason for disposing of her body in a way that does not give too much information.

      In my theory, it means that Joran not only says it, but he backs it up.  What he actually is saying is:

      I had to dispose of her body because I had sex with her and did not use a condom.
      I'm sorry if this sounds confusing but it makes sense when following my theory and I just can't explain it any better.  For me this is an outright confession if I follow Joran's pattern of talking.

      I hope no one got a headache reading this.  I can't find the right words to explain, but it makes sense in my head and I am not BUI, although after that, I just might need to.

      Mr brains are just scrambled enough, that this makes total sense to me  ::MonkeyEek::



      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Anna on March 04, 2008, 02:02:41 AM
      What am I missing here? 

       ::MonkeyConfused::
      High speed submersibles/submarines/go-fast boats have long been used for transportation of cocaine and would seem much more efficient than putting it in a trap weighing hundreds of pounds in a hundred feet of water. 

      Not the same thing at all to me but what also does drug trade have to do with finding Natalee?  Have to actually see anything done about drug trafficking in the area to believe it.

      Is the idea that Natalee was disposed of by drug traffickers?   ::MonkeyShocked::

      What about Daury/Daddy?

      Not following the relevance of any of this but nothing about this disappearance has ever made sense anyway.


       ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyConfused::

      Guess I'll just have to wait 240 pendulum swings and see.

      Why do I find myself in the Twilight Zone all the time lately?

       ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyNoNo:: ::MonkeyConfused::



      Trap is in fairly shallow waters.  Trap is a "post office" of sorts for drug drops offs from Columbia or wherever.  Boat or sub with drugs, diver puts drugs in trap...another boat, when it's safe retrieves the drugs. 

      The relivence is the corruption in Aruba.  This could be what makes the walls of Babylon tumble.  Once that happens we may know what happened to Natalee.. 


      Yeah, leave $200 million or so in cocaine unattended in the middle of the ocean is a great idea!    ::MonkeyEek:: Should have thought of that. 

      And if this is uncovered, someone is going to break and just start telling what they did with Natalee?  Just out of the goodness of their heart since there are no deals in their "system"?  Guess it's the leap from Paulus to the drug dealers that gives me a problem.  And why they would be so inclined as to dispose of her in one of their regular drops with a whole vast ocean out there but like everything else, guess will just have to wait and see.

      I've never been totally convinced Natalee was disposed of at sea anyway so maybe that is part of my problem.

      I stay in the Twilight Zone more time than not these days as far as information we are gathering.

       ::MonkeyConfused::

      G'night!

      .



      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: klaasend on March 04, 2008, 02:04:31 AM
      Anna - I didn't say anything about Natalee being disposed of in that trap or any other trap.  Personally, I don't think she's in the ocean. 


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Anna on March 04, 2008, 02:06:39 AM
      O/T  Oh, no, NOT AGAIN!!!

      THE NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE IN BIRMINGHAM HAS ISSUED A TORNADO WARNING FOR WEST CENTRAL WALKER COUNTY IN CENTRAL ALABAMA EASTERN FAYETTE COUNTY IN WEST CENTRAL ALABAMA NORTH CENTRAL TUSCALOOSA COUNTY IN WEST CENTRAL ALABAMA.


      Note this is a warning and not a watch.  That means there is one or more actually on the ground.

      Signing off and battening down the hatches!  All Alabama monkeys, be safe!

      .


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: klaasend on March 04, 2008, 02:08:23 AM
      Geez - stay safe Anna


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: hotping on March 04, 2008, 02:09:52 AM
      Sending Prayers out for the Tornado Warning Area! Please Dear Lord Keep Everyone in the Storm Area Safe....Amen...


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: martini on March 04, 2008, 02:16:07 AM
      O/T  Oh, no, NOT AGAIN!!!

      THE NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE IN BIRMINGHAM HAS ISSUED A TORNADO WARNING FOR WEST CENTRAL WALKER COUNTY IN CENTRAL ALABAMA EASTERN FAYETTE COUNTY IN WEST CENTRAL ALABAMA NORTH CENTRAL TUSCALOOSA COUNTY IN WEST CENTRAL ALABAMA.


      Note this is a warning and not a watch.  That means there is one or more actually on the ground.

      Signing off and battening down the hatches!  All Alabama monkeys, be safe!

      .


      Take cover and be safe...

      Martini  :2doh:


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Bearlyhere on March 04, 2008, 03:00:57 AM
      What am I missing here? 

       ::MonkeyConfused::
      High speed submersibles/submarines/go-fast boats have long been used for transportation of cocaine and would seem much more efficient than putting it in a trap weighing hundreds of pounds in a hundred feet of water. 

      Not the same thing at all to me but what also does drug trade have to do with finding Natalee?  Have to actually see anything done about drug trafficking in the area to believe it.

      Is the idea that Natalee was disposed of by drug traffickers?   ::MonkeyShocked::

      What about Daury/Daddy?

      Not following the relevance of any of this but nothing about this disappearance has ever made sense anyway.


       ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyConfused::

      Guess I'll just have to wait 240 pendulum swings and see.

      Why do I find myself in the Twilight Zone all the time lately?

       ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyNoNo:: ::MonkeyConfused::



      Unless, Daury is the one who picks up the mail and Joran knows who this is, by hook or by crook, he got Daury to deposit Natalee's body somewhere.  Joran says he has something on Daury.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Bearlyhere on March 04, 2008, 03:07:15 AM
      O/T  Oh, no, NOT AGAIN!!!

      THE NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE IN BIRMINGHAM HAS ISSUED A TORNADO WARNING FOR WEST CENTRAL WALKER COUNTY IN CENTRAL ALABAMA EASTERN FAYETTE COUNTY IN WEST CENTRAL ALABAMA NORTH CENTRAL TUSCALOOSA COUNTY IN WEST CENTRAL ALABAMA.


      Note this is a warning and not a watch.  That means there is one or more actually on the ground.

      Signing off and battening down the hatches!  All Alabama monkeys, be safe!

      .


      Oh no!  I am sorry to see this.  I will send out prayers right away.  Please let us know you are safe.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Shell on March 04, 2008, 04:14:38 AM
      OT~Has someone already spoken for the mermaid avi (ariel). I am using it until I hear otherwise.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: GBMW on March 04, 2008, 04:41:16 AM
      You know Peter much better than we do being in Holland, but we have heard that he not only investigates murders with vigor but like to bust the occasional corrupt politician as well. Is this true?
      [/quote]

      he did so many cases.
      http://www.peterrdevries.nl/tekst/dossierindextot.htm

      about corrupt officials, right out of my head:

      1. exposed a public prosecutor (Tonino) with child porn on his computer. Tonino put his computer with the garbage, that's how peter r. got hold of the computer. the public prosecutor got suspended.

      2. exposed the upcoming reserve queen (mabel wisse smit) as having a relationship with dutch biggest gangster Klaas Bruinsma in the 80s. mabel wisse smit lied about this to the prime minister Balkenende. prince johan-friso (son of queen beatrix) lost his right to the dutch throne because of this.

      3. exposed dutch secret service (AIVD) trying to frame the later assassinated pim fortuyn as if he had sex with underage drugs addicted moroccan boys.
      (pim fortuyn got assassinated a week before the elections as he was leading the polls)

      4. exposed dutch board of procureurs generaal violating parking rules right outside the dutch OM headoffice.

      5. exposed officials of the dutch police national headquarters violating parking rules outside the hq's.
      head of police promised change. year later the violating was still going on.

      6. exposed a police officer (possible drugging and) changing the will (testament) of multiple old, dying people so he inherited their money / real estate.

      i am sure i forgot something.

      most of these involved hidden camera.
      [/quote]

      caesu: good summary!  I think Peter R. de Vries is one of the few in the media that's doing his own research in this case. And doing a good job!
      From Jorans' point of view: in the club Manhattan he said of Peter R. de Vries (the night when the 'confessionshow' was anounced he went to a party in Arnhem) "he's trying to ruin my life"


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: KarmaRoundUp on March 04, 2008, 05:10:46 AM
      If Natalee's remains have been recovered ... somebody need to tell Tim Miller.  As of February 27, 2008 ... Tim's impression was that there were 169 targets which still needed to be searched.

      Janet

      +++++++++++


      Tim Miller
      On the Record w/ Greta
      February 27, 2008


      MILLER: The report we got is the DNA that came back did not match Natalee's DNA and when we located that it looked like more than just a piece of cloth and I mean we, we felt as though we seen a skull in there. We got the Aruba authorities involved, they felt there was something in there, we dove on it and the thing is that's only 1 of over 170 targets out there we still have to investigate, so we've got a lot of work ahead of us.

      Transcript - Heli (RU)

      Maybe we aren't allowed to know just yet.  Maybe they need more confirmation.

      I don't believe they have found Natalee's remains. I see and visit with Beth's Mom at least once a week, usually more, and she could not keep that secret. There are plenty or real mysteries with which to deal. It would be great though. I have a feeling that Beth would be with her Mom if that had happened as well.
      I also don't think they found Natalee's remains but why would they even bother sending those 6 images to the FBI unless something was found?


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: GBMW on March 04, 2008, 05:13:50 AM
      Peter R de Vries on Robert Jensen Show

      -talking about the book-incident on DWDD, they show the clip
      -tomorrow Beth will be on, pre-recorded, Beth told Robert that she's very grateful to Peter
      -behind the scenes a lot going on, investigation re-opened
      -Joran still murder-suspect
      -cannot be solved within one week, takes time
      -Robert could tell that when Joran was on his show, that he was holding back, 99% of the audience felt that too, not that he was lying but he was holding back information, he knew more than he was letting on
      -Peter's investigation in 2006, was clear to Peter then that Joran was involved, it's strange that Joran wanted to remain silent, if you're innocent all you want to do is tell the truth, not remain silent. Joran couldn't answer the simplest questions
      -Peter asked questions on P&W-show (wine incident) Joran couldn't or wouldn't answer
      -Peter's wife said to Anita on P&W-show, while she was helping Peter getting wine out of his eyes: "You educated your son well" in a very sarcastic way
      -Peter still talks to Beth on a regular basis
      HAHAHA!
      I knew Peter's wife said something sarcastic to anita,thank you Jo-An ::MonkeyHaHa::

      Anita's reply was: it seems like i didn't

      JE   ::MonkeyEek::
      Did Anita really say that? Are you making a joke?
      If she really gave that answer, it sounds like she may be finally beginning to get a clue!
      Wow! Anita - snap out of it 

      (http://i92.photobucket.com/albums/l28/TallyAnna/smilies/snapoutofit.gif)

      I think she's slowly getting it...she's even quoted saying (after the Peter R. de Vries show) that they will try to continue living their lives the best way they can.."We have 2 other sons you know". And the fact his parents didn't come to Holland after the show to visit him and hardly spoke with Jorans lawyers...that's also telling.
      Jorans grandfather did have some weird comments on a radio-interview on BNR Radio after the show though....he was defending Joran. When the interviewer was talking about the wine incident: When Joran threw a glass of wine: his grandfather interrupted and said something like: Well don't exaggerate; it was only a little bit....and talking of his confession he said something like: well he's just a 20 year old kid...nothing special about the way he's talking etc. Sorry; don't know the exact words anymore but it was quite despicable in words and tone of voice...I turned the radio off...


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Jo-An on March 04, 2008, 05:14:18 AM

      caesu: good summary!  I think Peter R. de Vries is one of the few in the media that's doing his own research in this case. And doing a good job!
      From Jorans' point of view: in the club Manhattan he said of Peter R. de Vries (the night when the 'confessionshow' was anounced he went to a party in Arnhem) "he's trying to ruin my life"

      Well duh... how many lifes has Joran ruined so far?!  ::MonkeyEek::
      Djeez... making himself to be the victim... so typical...


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Silverfox on March 04, 2008, 05:29:16 AM
      Someone asked about "relevance" ...

      This is as close as I can come to relevance...

      This region of South America is unstable.  It has been for a long time.

      The Island of Aruba has a longstanding and documented history with the Mafia and with drug trafficking, money laundering and human trafficking.

      The island is a mere (13 miles?) from the coast of Venezuela and Columbia, making it a hub for illegal activities.

      This group at SM basically feels that Natalee was drugged with a date rape drug.

      Where do drugs of this sort come from?  The candy man.  Who is the candy man?  Drug dealers.

      The same group feels she may have died from a reaction from this drug.  Who had the most to lose if this were true?  The perp as well as anyone who might have sold it.

      This group also feels that there has been an enormous coverup extending not only among LE but also to the judiciary and indeed, to high elected officials.  Why would there be a cover-up?  Because there is corruption.  Why is there corruption?  Because there are probably "bribed" officials as well as officials who might be in the "business" as well.

      It is rumored that Chavez and or his cronies/allies are also into drug trafficking.  just because he is the elected head of Venezuela does not mean he is beyond side "money-making" ventures, i.e. corruption, payoffs and trafficking, laundering activities...Sure he nationalized "petroleum" but what if he could take his "illicit activities funds" and use these to fund "covert" operations to take over an entire continent.  Remember, many of the Columbian drug cartels escaped U.S. and Columbian arrests by seeking refuge in Venezuela under the protective arm of it's leader.

      There is undoubtedly a "nexus" (connection) between the people who fuel Chavez also fuel FARC and also tie in with trafficking in this region.  This is what we are learning from the Columbian government now -- that they can tie in this connection because of seized computer records from the headquarters of the recently killed FARC official.  This is also why Chavez rattles the saber of war by calling for 10 battalions of troops along the V & C border.

      This "corruption" obviously also spreads to the Island of Aruba -- well known and identified by Interpol, the US and other organizations to indeed be the hub for such illicit activities, especially considering it's dark past.

      This means that certain high placed law enforcement and governmental officials may be "on the take" so to speak.

      If we hypothesize that Paulus, as a high ranking official and former assistant to RC, the highest government official on the island, might possibly be "dirty" then it stands to reason that this man "called in some favors" to protect his son -- hence the cover-up.

      Many people had something to lose if it failed -- including the possibility of a a threat to expose all if the help was not granted (bribery, extortion, whatever).  Methinks Aruba is a paradise of "owemes" ...You scratch my back and I will scratch yours...Anyone who is anybody there has something on somebody else, hence the silence on the reward.  The big guys have the money -- anyone who might want to expose the truth is eliminated (certain reporters and cameramen committing "sucicide" -- bank tellers dying -- people disappearing or suddenly retiring, etc....

      (http://i195.photobucket.com/albums/z215/kickradio/harryking.jpg)
      It all adds up.

      If you consider the idea that the US has been working with certian Dutch and possibly Aruban authorities to bring down the drug trafficking and as a result found high placed connections to Chavez, the cartels, and political instability then it becomes apparent that Natalee may have been caught at the wrong place at the wrong time and in the interest of National Security the U.S. and certain high placed investigators from the Netherlands and Aruba just want to not pursue her situation because the real target is and has been Chavez and the drug cartels all along.

      Chavez apparently inherited Noriega's business and power base. 

      But, due to the work of SM, the Persistence and the Holloway family this chapter just will not go away.

      Now there is the possibility that the Persistence may have document evidence of drug drop-off locations.  All because of a search for a missing 18 year old girl from Alabama, USA.

      The video tapes of all those targets is a gold mine of information, undoubtedly, for the good guys.

      So yes, there is relevance...

      It just took the crossed timing events of the Persistence and it's discoveries to be linked with the killing of a highly place revolutionary to expose this incredible unfolding of events.  Remember, Columbia claims it can now prove through this documentation that FARC was getting it's funding via Chavez via the drug cartels.  The long arm of those cartels obviously has had an influence on the Island of Aruba and indeed, in influencing the investigation of the disappearance of Natalee Holloway.

      I would venture to guess that most of this the family already knows and has had to keep under their hats.  Why else would a U.S. Senator suddenly drop  his query into her disappearance after meeting with the Aruban delegation were it not National Security related.

      That is why it might be relevant.

      Just my Humble Opinion. 




      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Tater on March 04, 2008, 06:20:57 AM
      Bearly,
      Makes as much sense as anything else has lately.  I agree that Joran gets personal and graphic in an attempt to make himself believable, at least it does in his own mind.  He also parrots things his parents have told him like not to have sex without a condom in an further attempt to convince them he is telling the truth.  Plays them like a violin.

      jmo

      I guess I'm just not one for the grand conspiracies involving everybody on the island.  For me, it's still a very simple crime committed by a garden variety punk.  Joran and Paulus did it.

      As Frank used to say No Sloot, No Justice.  I still adhere to that line of thought.

      Getting a headache, too.  Maybe BUI is the way to go after all.

       ::MonkeyHaHa::




      I agree with this only I include the Kalpoe brothers.Sometimes it seem's they are diminishing from the crime by laying low and I'd like to see them front and center where they ought to be.Joran,Kalpoe's, and Paulas,the major players..I also don't believe Natalee is in the water.It's my opinion she was in the dump and probably what's left of her,still is....All this drug business is just side tracking.Like my Dad used to say,making mountains out of mole hills,,JMO of course..


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Bearlyhere on March 04, 2008, 06:22:39 AM
      Someone asked about "relevance" ...

      This is as close as I can come to relevance...

      This region of South America is unstable.  It has been for a long time.

      The Island of Aruba has a longstanding and documented history with the Mafia and with drug trafficking, money laundering and human trafficking.

      The island is a mere (13 miles?) from the coast of Venezuela and Columbia, making it a hub for illegal activities.

      This group at SM basically feels that Natalee was drugged with a date rape drug.

      Where do drugs of this sort come from?  The candy man.  Who is the candy man?  Drug dealers.

      The same group feels she may have died from a reaction from this drug.  Who had the most to lose if this were true?  The perp as well as anyone who might have sold it.

      This group also feels that there has been an enormous coverup extending not only among LE but also to the judiciary and indeed, to high elected officials.  Why would there be a cover-up?  Because there is corruption.  Why is there corruption?  Because there are probably "bribed" officials as well as officials who might be in the "business" as well.

      It is rumored that Chavez and or his cronies/allies are also into drug trafficking.  just because he is the elected head of Venezuela does not mean he is beyond side "money-making" ventures, i.e. corruption, payoffs and trafficking, laundering activities...Sure he nationalized "petroleum" but what if he could take his "illicit activities funds" and use these to fund "covert" operations to take over an entire continent.  Remember, many of the Columbian drug cartels escaped U.S. and Columbian arrests by seeking refuge in Venezuela under the protective arm of it's leader.

      There is undoubtedly a "nexus" (connection) between the people who fuel Chavez also fuel FARC and also tie in with trafficking in this region.  This is what we are learning from the Columbian government now -- that they can tie in this connection because of seized computer records from the headquarters of the recently killed FARC official.  This is also why Chavez rattles the saber of war by calling for 10 battalions of troops along the V & C border.

      This "corruption" obviously also spreads to the Island of Aruba -- well known and identified by Interpol, the US and other organizations to indeed be the hub for such illicit activities, especially considering it's dark past.

      This means that certain high placed law enforcement and governmental officials may be "on the take" so to speak.

      If we hypothesize that Paulus, as a high ranking official and former assistant to RC, the highest government official on the island, might possibly be "dirty" then it stands to reason that this man "called in some favors" to protect his son -- hence the cover-up.

      Many people had something to lose if it failed -- including the possibility of a a threat to expose all if the help was not granted (bribery, extortion, whatever).  Methinks Aruba is a paradise of "owemes" ...You scratch my back and I will scratch yours...Anyone who is anybody there has something on somebody else, hence the silence on the reward.  The big guys have the money -- anyone who might want to expose the truth is eliminated (certain reporters and cameramen committing "sucicide" -- bank tellers dying -- people disappearing or suddenly retiring, etc....

      (http://i195.photobucket.com/albums/z215/kickradio/harryking.jpg)
      It all adds up.

      If you consider the idea that the US has been working with certian Dutch and possibly Aruban authorities to bring down the drug trafficking and as a result found high placed connections to Chavez, the cartels, and political instability then it becomes apparent that Natalee may have been caught at the wrong place at the wrong time and in the interest of National Security the U.S. and certain high placed investigators from the Netherlands and Aruba just want to not pursue her situation because the real target is and has been Chavez and the drug cartels all along.

      Chavez apparently inherited Noriega's business and power base. 

      But, due to the work of SM, the Persistence and the Holloway family this chapter just will not go away.

      Now there is the possibility that the Persistence may have document evidence of drug drop-off locations.  All because of a search for a missing 18 year old girl from Alabama, USA.

      The video tapes of all those targets is a gold mine of information, undoubtedly, for the good guys.

      So yes, there is relevance...

      It just took the crossed timing events of the Persistence and it's discoveries to be linked with the killing of a highly place revolutionary to expose this incredible unfolding of events.  Remember, Columbia claims it can now prove through this documentation that FARC was getting it's funding via Chavez via the drug cartels.  The long arm of those cartels obviously has had an influence on the Island of Aruba and indeed, in influencing the investigation of the disappearance of Natalee Holloway.

      I would venture to guess that most of this the family already knows and has had to keep under their hats.  Why else would a U.S. Senator suddenly drop  his query into her disappearance after meeting with the Aruban delegation were it not National Security related.

      That is why it might be relevant.

      Just my Humble Opinion. 




      It wasn't me, but thank you for taking the time to post this and clarify things.   :salut:

      Things that make you go:

       ::MonkeyShocked:: ::MonkeyShocked:: ::MonkeyShocked::

      ...and make my heart ache more for Natalee and her family.  [broken heart emoticon]


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Silverfox on March 04, 2008, 06:48:41 AM
      ...  For me, it's still a very simple crime committed by a garden variety punk.  Joran and Paulus did it...I also don't believe Natalee is in the water.It's my opinion she was in the dump and probably what's left of her,still is....All this drug business is just side tracking.Like my Dad used to say,making mountains out of mole hills,,JMO of course..


      (http://i195.photobucket.com/albums/z215/kickradio/harryking2.gif)

      You are entitled to your opinion of course.  Actually I agree with you but you know what?  There is and has been a cover-up to protect these two and one has to wonder why, right?

      From the very beginning an alleged US DEA was involved -- doors were closed on fact-finding -- and more than once it has been leaked by Mos and others that the deadly triangle of that DEA agent, Nat's family and the publicity caused by mass media have hindered the investigation and prosecution.

      One has to ask why?  for such a simple situation involving father and son and (others?)....

      There are reasons why people don't want people to find out things -- and that has to be because it is perceived by someone or someones very high up that there is a higher priority than justice for natalee at this point.  National Security would be the only thing that I can think of that keeps this powder keg hot.  Paulus used to be in a position under the Justice Minister to find out things -- or actually be involved in things that might involve turning your head the other way so that certain activities can take place -- hence now he needs a favor to protect his wayward and troubled son -- so he calls in the favor.

      just as simple but ugly in the face of justice.  For now that happens to be my opinion and yes -- it is like dominoes and certainly if one falls many will fall, perhaps a couple of governments in the process.  All because of the 'persistence" to keep the heat up on a missing girl from Alabama.
      (http://i195.photobucket.com/albums/z215/kickradio/harryking.jpg)
      I predict that this "simple" crime will make the history books. ::MonkeyCool::


      (http://i195.photobucket.com/albums/z215/kickradio/justicefornatalee4.jpg)


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: MumInOhio on March 04, 2008, 06:58:54 AM
      Siverfox...Lala's and I have discussed this in the Shango thread...somewhere...Both Paulus and Joran refer to Williams as fbi, Beth and Dave as dea, Joran has mentions in his book of US customs, twice, and even found a reference to an Agent Smitt from the Embassy...that one baffled me.

      Things that make you go hmmmm!!!


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Silverfox on March 04, 2008, 07:04:31 AM
      Siverfox...Lala's and I have discussed this in the Shango thread...somewhere...Both Paulus and Joran refer to Williams as fbi, Beth and Dave as dea, Joran has mentions in his book of US customs, twice, and even found a reference to an Agent Smitt from the Embassy...that one baffled me.

      Things that make you go hmmmm!!!

      Yep, and don't forget the alleged phone taps that cost Paulus his judgment monies on appeal..who would have been tapping into the system on the night Natalee disappeared?  That could have also explained why the early and sudden appearance by the "DEA agent on vacation" (wasn't that convenient?) to greet the Holloways when they arrived and then even help escort them around? 


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: mojo on March 04, 2008, 07:13:15 AM
      good analysis silverfox. would also explain paulus' apparent belief that he could game the system.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: MumInOhio on March 04, 2008, 07:24:48 AM
      Siverfox...Lala's and I have discussed this in the Shango thread...somewhere...Both Paulus and Joran refer to Williams as fbi, Beth and Dave as dea, Joran has mentions in his book of US customs, twice, and even found a reference to an Agent Smitt from the Embassy...that one baffled me.

      Things that make you go hmmmm!!!

      Yep, and don't forget the alleged phone taps that cost Paulus his judgment monies on appeal..who would have been tapping into the system on the night Natalee disappeared?  That could have also explained why the early and sudden appearance by the "DEA agent on vacation" (wasn't that convenient?) to greet the Holloways when they arrived and then even help escort them around? 

      And Joran on some sort of 'Watch List' when he landed in New York.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Rob on March 04, 2008, 07:54:44 AM
      Good Morning,

      My *feelings* on this Mr. Farro are ~ he is a straggler from the North Valle Cartel. When the major round up occurred last summer and fall it was divulged that the Cartel had over 1500 business entities. Many in Miami and Oranjestad.

      Someone was running the nuts and bolts of that operation, maybe that was Mr. Farro. jmo

      Grande did a lot of research on the North Valle Cartel and "Plain View". This is not new for most of us, but since we have new members, I'm posting it again.

      (http://i66.photobucket.com/albums/h254/chicagoutfit/Renteriaassociatessaiehjassirmuvdij.jpg)

      (http://i66.photobucket.com/albums/h254/chicagoutfit/PlainviewFloridaInc.jpg)

      (http://i66.photobucket.com/albums/h254/chicagoutfit/FloridaRegisteredPlainviewincandNV.jpg)

      Luis Mansur - not sure if this is Jossy's brother. We all know of his troubles.
      (http://i66.photobucket.com/albums/h254/chicagoutfit/LuisMansurFelonyDadeCOunty.jpg)

      There is more located here.
      http://s66.photobucket.com/albums/h254/chicagoutfit/?start=all

      An interesting side note to the Cartel, is when the round-up occurred, it paved the way for the FARC to take over completely. They had no competition.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Bearlyhere on March 04, 2008, 08:06:15 AM
      Bearly,
      Makes as much sense as anything else has lately.  I agree that Joran gets personal and graphic in an attempt to make himself believable, at least it does in his own mind.  He also parrots things his parents have told him like not to have sex without a condom in an further attempt to convince them he is telling the truth.  Plays them like a violin.

      jmo

      I guess I'm just not one for the grand conspiracies involving everybody on the island.  For me, it's still a very simple crime committed by a garden variety punk.  Joran and Paulus did it.

      As Frank used to say No Sloot, No Justice.  I still adhere to that line of thought.

      Getting a headache, too.  Maybe BUI is the way to go after all.

       ::MonkeyHaHa::




      I agree with this only I include the Kalpoe brothers.Sometimes it seem's they are diminishing from the crime by laying low and I'd like to see them front and center where they ought to be.Joran,Kalpoe's, and Paulas,the major players..I also don't believe Natalee is in the water.It's my opinion she was in the dump and probably what's left of her,still is....All this drug business is just side tracking.Like my Dad used to say,making mountains out of mole hills,,JMO of course..

      That's amazing so many understood that.  I think we've been in this cage together too long.

       ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyHaHa::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Tater on March 04, 2008, 08:07:26 AM
      I think most of us for most of our lives have always known about the Columbian drug cartels and the movement of drugs from there.We have spent billions of dollars trying to stop it but to no avail.It seems to me if Paulas called in a favor which is very likely he did,finding the remains of Natalee would be a lost cause.Why take her out into 90 feet of water when they have full capability of taking her out so deep  it would be impossible to ever find her.Why stop at 90 when they could go further out into the thousands depth?This is what makes no sense to me..At 90 she could be found,deeper,not so..Yoran in the confession tapes say's Dumped her,*dump,dump,dump*..Sometimes the obvious stays right under our noses.I think it all went South here..

      Dave: That’s coming from Chief Dompig himself.

      Abrams: So the chief is telling you to look in a particular area.
      Do you want to tell us where generally or how he is coming up with these areas?


      Dave: Well, of course it’s no secret now. He indicated we needed to center our effort and time in the ocean and that’s what we are doing.

      Abrams: Why haven’t the Aruba authorities looked in these areas?

      Dave: Well, I don’t think they have the capabilities of doing what we’re trying to do. We’ve got some people from the Unites States in that have sonar search capabilities and the Aruba authorities don’t. So, that’s what we’re doing.

      Abrams: How long are you going to stay there Dave?

      Dave: Well, I’m scheduled to go back Thursday. In fact, Tim Miller and I came over here to plan a search for the dump area. After we met with the police authorities, we were redirected to search out in the ocean. I’ve extended my trip now by seven more days. I intend to come back possibly by Thursday, who knows? I think Texas Equusearch is going to stay to the end.

      Abrams: Dave good luck, it sounds like chief Dompig certainly hasn’t given up on this. He sounds like he’s ready to haul Deepak right back in there.

      Dave: I don’t believe any of us are going to give up. So, it’s a matter of we’re going to see it to the end.

      http://scaredmonkeys.com/2005/10/25/dave-holloway-yes-for-the-first-time-we-have-gotten-some-guidance-on-what-areas-to-focus-our-search-efforts-on/


      We all know for sure Dompig has had the best intentions from the start,right? ::MonkeyNoNo:: Redirect,redirect,redirect..That's exactly what happened.Dave was way to close to finding Natalee way back then..:(  Just my opinion of course..



      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Tater on March 04, 2008, 08:08:51 AM
      Bearly,
      Makes as much sense as anything else has lately.  I agree that Joran gets personal and graphic in an attempt to make himself believable, at least it does in his own mind.  He also parrots things his parents have told him like not to have sex without a condom in an further attempt to convince them he is telling the truth.  Plays them like a violin.

      jmo

      I guess I'm just not one for the grand conspiracies involving everybody on the island.  For me, it's still a very simple crime committed by a garden variety punk.  Joran and Paulus did it.

      As Frank used to say No Sloot, No Justice.  I still adhere to that line of thought.

      Getting a headache, too.  Maybe BUI is the way to go after all.

       ::MonkeyHaHa::




      I agree with this only I include the Kalpoe brothers.Sometimes it seem's they are diminishing from the crime by laying low and I'd like to see them front and center where they ought to be.Joran,Kalpoe's, and Paulas,the major players..I also don't believe Natalee is in the water.It's my opinion she was in the dump and probably what's left of her,still is....All this drug business is just side tracking.Like my Dad used to say,making mountains out of mole hills,,JMO of course..

      That's amazing so many understood that.  I think we've been in this cage together too long.

       ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyHaHa::

       ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: mojo on March 04, 2008, 08:12:07 AM
      was the guy producing drugs or just money laundering?? or both.

      http://www.visitaruba.com/facts/community/health.html (http://www.visitaruba.com/facts/community/health.html)

      ..... Landslaboratorium Aruba

      Landslaboratorium Aruba or the Public Health Laboratory (PHL) of Aruba has three main departments; Clinical Chemistry & Hematology-, Microbiology & Infection Serology and Pathology. The Clinical Chemistry & Hematology department is located in the Horacio Oduber Hospital and gives a 24-hour service to inpatients.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Bearlyhere on March 04, 2008, 08:19:18 AM
      Bearly,
      Makes as much sense as anything else has lately.  I agree that Joran gets personal and graphic in an attempt to make himself believable, at least it does in his own mind.  He also parrots things his parents have told him like not to have sex without a condom in an further attempt to convince them he is telling the truth.  Plays them like a violin.

      jmo

      I guess I'm just not one for the grand conspiracies involving everybody on the island.  For me, it's still a very simple crime committed by a garden variety punk.  Joran and Paulus did it.

      As Frank used to say No Sloot, No Justice.  I still adhere to that line of thought.

      Getting a headache, too.  Maybe BUI is the way to go after all.

       ::MonkeyHaHa::




      I agree with this only I include the Kalpoe brothers.Sometimes it seem's they are diminishing from the crime by laying low and I'd like to see them front and center where they ought to be.Joran,Kalpoe's, and Paulas,the major players..I also don't believe Natalee is in the water.It's my opinion she was in the dump and probably what's left of her,still is....All this drug business is just side tracking.Like my Dad used to say,making mountains out of mole hills,,JMO of course..

      I haven't forgotten about K2 or Paulie the Perve. 

      The reason the dump keeps coming back to me is because , IIRC, when Patrick asks where she is, Joran doesn't say-in the ocean.  He says the ocean is big.  That sent off so many alarms for me, I thought the fire department would show up.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: MumInOhio on March 04, 2008, 08:21:42 AM
      Rob......Thanks for posting that...an interesting side note...Ernesto Arambatzis appears to have fallen off of the radar...a domestic violence case on 2007....I wonder where he is if not in Miami?


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Bearlyhere on March 04, 2008, 08:22:43 AM
      good analysis silverfox. would also explain paulus' apparent belief that he could game the system.

      Welcome to the cage where we start the day like this:   ::MonkeyCool:: and end the day like

      this:   ::MonkeyConfused::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Tater on March 04, 2008, 08:23:24 AM
      Bearly,
      Makes as much sense as anything else has lately.  I agree that Joran gets personal and graphic in an attempt to make himself believable, at least it does in his own mind.  He also parrots things his parents have told him like not to have sex without a condom in an further attempt to convince them he is telling the truth.  Plays them like a violin.

      jmo

      I guess I'm just not one for the grand conspiracies involving everybody on the island.  For me, it's still a very simple crime committed by a garden variety punk.  Joran and Paulus did it.

      As Frank used to say No Sloot, No Justice.  I still adhere to that line of thought.

      Getting a headache, too.  Maybe BUI is the way to go after all.

       ::MonkeyHaHa::




      I agree with this only I include the Kalpoe brothers.Sometimes it seem's they are diminishing from the crime by laying low and I'd like to see them front and center where they ought to be.Joran,Kalpoe's, and Paulas,the major players..I also don't believe Natalee is in the water.It's my opinion she was in the dump and probably what's left of her,still is....All this drug business is just side tracking.Like my Dad used to say,making mountains out of mole hills,,JMO of course..

      I haven't forgotten about K2 or Paulie the Perve. 

      The reason the dump keeps coming back to me is because , IIRC, when Patrick asks where she is, Joran doesn't say-in the ocean.  He says the ocean is big.  That sent off so many alarms for me, I thought the fire department would show up.

      Oh my gosh what a hoot you are.. ::MonkeyHaHa:: Paulie the perve..What a fantastic name for him..I'd laugh if it wasn't so dog gone profound.Paulie the perve..Oh my gosh!!! ::MonkeyCool::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Rob on March 04, 2008, 08:27:11 AM
      Rob......Thanks for posting that...an interesting side note...Ernesto Arambatzis appears to have fallen off of the radar...a domestic violence case on 2007....I wonder where he is if not in Miami?

      Morning Mum, I guess I'm one of those nuts that believes Mos when he says it's just the main suspects and no one else. LOL.

      I don't think Ernesto is involved in any way... but I could certainly be wrong and I'm just speculating.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: private eye on March 04, 2008, 08:30:56 AM
      If Natalee's remains have been recovered ... somebody need to tell Tim Miller.  As of February 27, 2008 ... Tim's impression was that there were 169 targets which still needed to be searched.

      Janet

      +++++++++++


      Tim Miller
      On the Record w/ Greta
      February 27, 2008


      MILLER: The report we got is the DNA that came back did not match Natalee's DNA and when we located that it looked like more than just a piece of cloth and I mean we, we felt as though we seen a skull in there. We got the Aruba authorities involved, they felt there was something in there, we dove on it and the thing is that's only 1 of over 170 targets out there we still have to investigate, so we've got a lot of work ahead of us.

      Transcript - Heli (RU)

      Maybe we aren't allowed to know just yet.  Maybe they need more confirmation.

      I don't believe they have found Natalee's remains. I see and visit with Beth's Mom at least once a week, usually more, and she could not keep that secret. There are plenty or real mysteries with which to deal. It would be great though. I have a feeling that Beth would be with her Mom if that had happened as well.
      I also don't think they found Natalee's remains but why would they even bother sending those 6 images to the FBI unless something was found?

      I thought they sent them to verify if the findings could be related in anyway to Natalee


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Bearlyhere on March 04, 2008, 08:31:03 AM
      Good Morning,

      My *feelings* on this Mr. Farro are ~ he is a straggler from the North Valle Cartel. When the major round up occurred last summer and fall it was divulged that the Cartel had over 1500 business entities. Many in Miami and Oranjestad.

      Someone was running the nuts and bolts of that operation, maybe that was Mr. Farro. jmo

      Grande did a lot of research on the North Valle Cartel and "Plain View". This is not new for most of us, but since we have new members, I'm posting it again.

      <snip>

      I hope this isn't what is meant by Joran being hidden in plain view or did he mean hidden through the efforts of those in Plain View.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: mojo on March 04, 2008, 08:32:32 AM
      good analysis silverfox. would also explain paulus' apparent belief that he could game the system.

      Welcome to the cage where we start the day like this:   ::MonkeyCool:: and end the day like

      this:   ::MonkeyConfused::

      barely, thanks for the welcome, but i never really left. i was here in the pre-barfdoll days.  ::MonkeyCool:: just way under the radar.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Bearlyhere on March 04, 2008, 08:44:26 AM
      I think most of us for most of our lives have always known about the Columbian drug cartels and the movement of drugs from there.We have spent billions of dollars trying to stop it but to no avail.It seems to me if Paulas called in a favor which is very likely he did,finding the remains of Natalee would be a lost cause.Why take her out into 90 feet of water when they have full capability of taking her out so deep  it would be impossible to ever find her.Why stop at 90 when they could go further out into the thousands depth?This is what makes no sense to me..At 90 she could be found,deeper,not so..Yoran in the confession tapes say's Dumped her,*dump,dump,dump*..Sometimes the obvious stays right under our noses.I think it all went South here..

      Dave: That’s coming from Chief Dompig himself.

      Abrams: So the chief is telling you to look in a particular area.
      Do you want to tell us where generally or how he is coming up with these areas?


      Dave: Well, of course it’s no secret now. He indicated we needed to center our effort and time in the ocean and that’s what we are doing.

      Abrams: Why haven’t the Aruba authorities looked in these areas?

      Dave: Well, I don’t think they have the capabilities of doing what we’re trying to do. We’ve got some people from the Unites States in that have sonar search capabilities and the Aruba authorities don’t. So, that’s what we’re doing.

      Abrams: How long are you going to stay there Dave?

      Dave: Well, I’m scheduled to go back Thursday. In fact, Tim Miller and I came over here to plan a search for the dump area. After we met with the police authorities, we were redirected to search out in the ocean. I’ve extended my trip now by seven more days. I intend to come back possibly by Thursday, who knows? I think Texas Equusearch is going to stay to the end.

      Abrams: Dave good luck, it sounds like chief Dompig certainly hasn’t given up on this. He sounds like he’s ready to haul Deepak right back in there.

      Dave: I don’t believe any of us are going to give up. So, it’s a matter of we’re going to see it to the end.

      http://scaredmonkeys.com/2005/10/25/dave-holloway-yes-for-the-first-time-we-have-gotten-some-guidance-on-what-areas-to-focus-our-search-efforts-on/


      We all know for sure Dompig has had the best intentions from the start,right? ::MonkeyNoNo:: Redirect,redirect,redirect..That's exactly what happened.Dave was way to close to finding Natalee way back then..:(  Just my opinion of course..



      Part of me agrees with you.  On the other hand, when Beth feels something strongly in her gut about her daughter, I want to go with that, too.  I haven't known her to be wrong--I am not talking about what she thinks happened, but her gut feelings. 

      I wouldn't throw efforts in either place away. 

      You are absolutely right, those guys couldn't give a direction that would help Beth to save their lives.  If it was green, they would tell her it was red, they have to continually mess with her head.  It's a good thing they make them tough in Alabama.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Castaglance on March 04, 2008, 08:45:35 AM
      good analysis silverfox. would also explain paulus' apparent belief that he could game the system.

      Welcome to the cage where we start the day like this:   ::MonkeyCool:: and end the day like

      this:   ::MonkeyConfused::

      remember the Klaas's bus picture?

      barely, thanks for the welcome, but i never really left. i was here in the pre-barfdoll days.  ::MonkeyCool:: just way under the radar.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Bearlyhere on March 04, 2008, 08:45:58 AM
      good analysis silverfox. would also explain paulus' apparent belief that he could game the system.

      Welcome to the cage where we start the day like this:   ::MonkeyCool:: and end the day like

      this:   ::MonkeyConfused::

      barely, thanks for the welcome, but i never really left. i was here in the pre-barfdoll days.  ::MonkeyCool:: just way under the radar.

      An original barf doll member?  I am honored to be in your presence.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Blonde on March 04, 2008, 08:47:18 AM
      What am I missing here? 

       ::MonkeyConfused::
      High speed submersibles/submarines/go-fast boats have long been used for transportation of cocaine and would seem much more efficient than putting it in a trap weighing hundreds of pounds in a hundred feet of water. 

      Not the same thing at all to me but what also does drug trade have to do with finding Natalee?  Have to actually see anything done about drug trafficking in the area to believe it.

      Is the idea that Natalee was disposed of by drug traffickers?   ::MonkeyShocked::

      What about Daury/Daddy?

      Not following the relevance of any of this but nothing about this disappearance has ever made sense anyway.


       ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyConfused::

      Guess I'll just have to wait 240 pendulum swings and see.

      Why do I find myself in the Twilight Zone all the time lately?

       ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyNoNo:: ::MonkeyConfused::



      Unless, Daury is the one who picks up the mail and Joran knows who this is, by hook or by crook, he got Daury to deposit Natalee's body somewhere.  Joran says he has something on Daury.

      Hmm that's a thought, Joran did say that, but that would be stupid of Daury to put a body so close to the post office


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: private eye on March 04, 2008, 08:47:35 AM
      Has anyone heard anymore about the Patrick television appearance in Aruba?


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Bearlyhere on March 04, 2008, 08:51:45 AM
      good analysis silverfox. would also explain paulus' apparent belief that he could game the system.

      Welcome to the cage where we start the day like this:   ::MonkeyCool:: and end the day like

      this:   ::MonkeyConfused::

      remember the Klaas's bus picture?

      barely, thanks for the welcome, but i never really left. i was here in the pre-barfdoll days.  ::MonkeyCool:: just way under the radar.

      Yes, I remember that bus.  I never forget anything made by the paws of the amazing Klaas.

      Were you on it?


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: martini on March 04, 2008, 08:52:39 AM
      Good Morning Monkeys

      Holloway mother on Dutch tv chat show
      Tuesday 04 March 2008

      Beth Twitty, the mother of the missing American teenager Natalee Holloway, is due to appear on the Jensen tv talk show on Tuesday night.

      Broadcaster RTL says it will be her first appearance on Dutch tv since crime reporter Peter R de Vries claimed to have solved the mystery of her daughter´s disappearance on the holiday island of Aruba in 2005.

      RTL says she will tell talk show host Robert Jensen about the claim for emotional damages she plans to launch against Dutch student Joran van der Sloot.

      Van der Sloot was heard on De Vries´ programme admitting he had been with Holloway when she died and saying that a friend disposed of her body.


      © DutchNews.nl  ::MonkeyWink::



      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Bearlyhere on March 04, 2008, 08:58:08 AM
      What am I missing here? 

       ::MonkeyConfused::
      High speed submersibles/submarines/go-fast boats have long been used for transportation of cocaine and would seem much more efficient than putting it in a trap weighing hundreds of pounds in a hundred feet of water. 

      Not the same thing at all to me but what also does drug trade have to do with finding Natalee?  Have to actually see anything done about drug trafficking in the area to believe it.

      Is the idea that Natalee was disposed of by drug traffickers?   ::MonkeyShocked::

      What about Daury/Daddy?

      Not following the relevance of any of this but nothing about this disappearance has ever made sense anyway.


       ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyConfused::

      Guess I'll just have to wait 240 pendulum swings and see.

      Why do I find myself in the Twilight Zone all the time lately?

       ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyNoNo:: ::MonkeyConfused::



      Unless, Daury is the one who picks up the mail and Joran knows who this is, by hook or by crook, he got Daury to deposit Natalee's body somewhere.  Joran says he has something on Daury.

      Hmm that's a thought, Joran did say that, but that would be stupid of Daury to put a body so close to the post office

      Not in the real post office, but it could have given him the idea to put her in a trap not on the route.

      Another way they could be involved is she was then attached to the submersible to be dumped in deeper waters.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Bearlyhere on March 04, 2008, 09:00:39 AM
      Has anyone heard anymore about the Patrick television appearance in Aruba?

      Not ignoring you, I just don't know.

      I didn't see anyone answer this yet and I just wanted you to know you are not invisible.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Rob on March 04, 2008, 09:04:01 AM
      I have to admit I'm curious as to what Mos' theory really is.

      The latest round of confessions does not met the evidence. So what exactly does Mos think happened to Natalee?

      He said she is not alive, and as Frank would say - How does he know? and if he knows, what is his working theory and why is he unable to prove it?

      Something is not right here.

      If he has a theory, and after almost three years, wouldn't it be better to release that theory in hopes that it will bring someone forward that has knowledge of said theory?


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Bearlyhere on March 04, 2008, 09:05:51 AM
      Does anyone know how deep the party boat that Croes inhabited goes out in the Ocean?  Roughly?  Over or under the 90 foot mark?


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Castaglance on March 04, 2008, 09:06:00 AM
      good analysis silverfox. would also explain paulus' apparent belief that he could game the system.

      Welcome to the cage where we start the day like this:   ::MonkeyCool:: and end the day like

      this:   ::MonkeyConfused::

      remember the Klaas's bus picture?

      barely, thanks for the welcome, but i never really left. i was here in the pre-barfdoll days.  ::MonkeyCool:: just way under the radar.

      Yes, I remember that bus.  I never forget anything made by the paws of the amazing Klaas.

      Were you on it?
      oops I messed that reply up, I wasn't on the bus, yet I was here from the getgo as well I am not very techie with pictures etc.
      I'll stick with being a voracious reader, supporter and semi lurker...
      I am Thankful for ALL THE MONKEYS and all that they do to keep Natalee in our thoughts and prayers each and every day.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Rob on March 04, 2008, 09:08:44 AM
      Does anyone know how deep the party boat that Croes inhabited goes out in the Ocean?  Roughly?  Over or under the 90 foot mark?

      I've been on the Tattoo twice. It kind of hugs the coast and goes to the downtown area and returns to the pier area. The whole trip is about 2 1/2 hours and the Tattoo moves pretty slowly.

      The flying fish are kind of interesting though.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Bearlyhere on March 04, 2008, 09:12:52 AM
      I have to admit I'm curious as to what Mos' theory really is.

      The latest round of confessions does not met the evidence. So what exactly does Mos think happened to Natalee?

      He said she is not alive, and as Frank would say - How does he know? and if he knows, what is his working theory and why is he unable to prove it?

      Something is not right here.

      If he has a theory, and after almost three years, wouldn't it be better to release that theory in hopes that it will bring someone forward that has knowledge of said theory?

      His working theory is CYAA.  (Cover your Aruban ass)

      If you were not the guy spouting off about protecting the suspect and tourism dollars, you might put it out there.  But if you are not allowed to have a theory and if you don't want to be a chandelier, you don't.



      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Rob on March 04, 2008, 09:19:06 AM

      His working theory is CYAA.  (Cover your Aruban ass)

      If you were not the guy spouting off about protecting the suspect and tourism dollars, you might put it out there.  But if you are not allowed to have a theory and if you don't want to be a chandelier, you don't.

      Hi Bearlyhere, right, I get that part. But doesn't he own it to Beth and Dave and the people of Aruba (who are suffering according to some) to at some point explain how he knows Natalee is not alive. I would think that is the least he could do. Whether he tells us or not is one thing, but doesn't the family have a right to know what happened to Natalee. Those are her family members and they have a right to know and a vested interest... as I think they will find out when a civil suit turns that island upside down and inside out.

      And if Mos is never going to charge anyone, what difference does it make anyway?


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Bearlyhere on March 04, 2008, 09:19:55 AM
      good analysis silverfox. would also explain paulus' apparent belief that he could game the system.

      Welcome to the cage where we start the day like this:   ::MonkeyCool:: and end the day like

      this:   ::MonkeyConfused::

      remember the Klaas's bus picture?

      barely, thanks for the welcome, but i never really left. i was here in the pre-barfdoll days.  ::MonkeyCool:: just way under the radar.

      Yes, I remember that bus.  I never forget anything made by the paws of the amazing Klaas.

      Were you on it?
      oops I messed that reply up, I wasn't on the bus, yet I was here from the getgo as well I am not very techie with pictures etc.
      I'll stick with being a voracious reader, supporter and semi lurker...
      I am Thankful for ALL THE MONKEYS and all that they do to keep Natalee in our thoughts and prayers each and every day.

      Please don't stop posting.  Everyone messes posts up.  It's a requirement to be allowed to continue in the cage.  I got your message anyway.  I answered it didn't I?  We can all read monkey!

      Did you see the post to you the other night?  It was right after you left.



      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: mojo on March 04, 2008, 09:24:09 AM
      good analysis silverfox. would also explain paulus' apparent belief that he could game the system.

      Welcome to the cage where we start the day like this:   ::MonkeyCool:: and end the day like

      this:   ::MonkeyConfused::

      barely, thanks for the welcome, but i never really left. i was here in the pre-barfdoll days.  ::MonkeyCool:: just way under the radar.

      An original barf doll member?  I am honored to be in your presence.

      thx...if we knew then...where this would go?! when beth speaks of a journey, she's not wrong.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: caesu on March 04, 2008, 09:26:01 AM
      tonight Beth Holloway:

      (http://www.rtl.nl/shows/jensen/components/images/jensen-holloway.jpg)

      Peter R. de Vries appearance last night:

      this link should work in windows media player (http://www.rtl.nl/(channel=rtl5,progid=jensen,zone=rtlgemist.rtl.nl/jensen,vm=/shows/jensen/home/,ord=1204640457953)/system/video/wvx/components/shows/jensen/miMedia/2008/week10/ma_peter_r_de_vries.avi_plain.xml/796.wvx)

      if not link is also here:
      http://www.rtl.nl/shows/jensen/home/index.xml


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Tater on March 04, 2008, 09:28:02 AM

      His working theory is CYAA.  (Cover your Aruban ass)

      If you were not the guy spouting off about protecting the suspect and tourism dollars, you might put it out there.  But if you are not allowed to have a theory and if you don't want to be a chandelier, you don't.

      Hi Bearlyhere, right, I get that part. But doesn't he own it to Beth and Dave and the people of Aruba (who are suffering according to some) to at some point explain how he knows Natalee is not alive. I would think that is the least he could do. Whether he tells us or not is one thing, but doesn't the family have a right to know what happened to Natalee. Those are her family members and they have a right to know and a vested interest... as I think they will find out when a civil suit turns that island upside down and inside out.

      And if Mos is never going to charge anyone, what difference does it make anyway?

      Hi Rob,
        I was under the assumption that Beth is confident she already knows what happened to Natalee.She even said she is at peace knowing now.I haven't seen that reply from Dave so don't know what he thinks.You're right,Mos owes them an explanation but then again,so did all the others before him and yet here we are today.Just out of curiosity,how will a civil suit turn the island upside down and inside out?


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: martini on March 04, 2008, 09:28:10 AM
      update~
      Colombia accused Ecuador and Venezuela of having ties with the Farc and said the rebels had tried to buy uranium.
      The Colombian authorities said the information had come from documents found during Saturday's raid on the rebel camp in Ecuador.

      "When they mention negotiations for 50 kilos of uranium, this means that the Farc are taking big steps in the world of terrorism to become a global aggressor. We're not talking of domestic guerrilla but transnational terrorism," said Colombian national police chief Oscar Naranjo at a news conference in Bogota.

      Meanwhile, French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner said the death of rebel leader Reyes was "bad news", as he had been France's contact in its efforts to free Ms Betancourt.

      BBC


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Bearlyhere on March 04, 2008, 09:28:13 AM

      His working theory is CYAA.  (Cover your Aruban ass)

      If you were not the guy spouting off about protecting the suspect and tourism dollars, you might put it out there.  But if you are not allowed to have a theory and if you don't want to be a chandelier, you don't.

      Hi Bearlyhere, right, I get that part. But doesn't he own it to Beth and Dave and the people of Aruba (who are suffering according to some) to at some point explain how he knows Natalee is not alive. I would think that is the least he could do. Whether he tells us or not is one thing, but doesn't the family have a right to know what happened to Natalee. Those are her family members and they have a right to know and a vested interest... as I think they will find out when a civil suit turns that island upside down and inside out.

      And if Mos is never going to charge anyone, what difference does it make anyway?

      You are 100% right.  You have no argument from me about that.

      He chooses to spin it to be everyone else's fault.  Do you know why?  Because he hasn't got the three things that Dorothy took her 3 friends to Oz to get.  That's why.  It's wrong, but it's why.

      Spin, spin, spin, spin, spin.
       :compress: :compress: :compress: :compress: :compress: :compress: :compress: :compress: :compress:


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Bearlyhere on March 04, 2008, 09:31:56 AM
      good analysis silverfox. would also explain paulus' apparent belief that he could game the system.

      Welcome to the cage where we start the day like this:   ::MonkeyCool:: and end the day like

      this:   ::MonkeyConfused::

      barely, thanks for the welcome, but i never really left. i was here in the pre-barfdoll days.  ::MonkeyCool:: just way under the radar.

      An original barf doll member?  I am honored to be in your presence.

      thx...if we knew then...where this would go?! when beth speaks of a journey, she's not wrong.

      She is unbelievable. 

      Even lent is only 40 days. 


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Rob on March 04, 2008, 09:38:02 AM

      His working theory is CYAA.  (Cover your Aruban ass)

      If you were not the guy spouting off about protecting the suspect and tourism dollars, you might put it out there.  But if you are not allowed to have a theory and if you don't want to be a chandelier, you don't.

      Hi Bearlyhere, right, I get that part. But doesn't he own it to Beth and Dave and the people of Aruba (who are suffering according to some) to at some point explain how he knows Natalee is not alive. I would think that is the least he could do. Whether he tells us or not is one thing, but doesn't the family have a right to know what happened to Natalee. Those are her family members and they have a right to know and a vested interest... as I think they will find out when a civil suit turns that island upside down and inside out.

      And if Mos is never going to charge anyone, what difference does it make anyway?

      Hi Rob,
        I was under the assumption that Beth is confident she already knows what happened to Natalee.She even said she is at peace knowing now.I haven't seen that reply from Dave so don't know what he thinks.You're right,Mos owes them an explanation but then again,so did all the others before him and yet here we are today.Just out of curiosity,how will a civil suit turn the island upside down and inside out?

      Morning Tot,

      A civil suit would have a discovery phase that would introduce evidence uncovered by Beth and Dave's investigators. It might be in direct conflict with what the Aruba Prosecutors office has discovered and if there is new info there, it could logically be asked why that was not investigated by the ALE and Prosecutor. That would lead to the obvious charges of corruption and the ALE protecting some and never giving the legal system a chance to work.

      Not to be a thorn in anyone's side, but how can Beth know what happened to Natalee if it was based on the confession and that is not in line with the evidence according to Mos? Something is missing in my opinion.

      I watched the Godfather Peter R shows too and I saw Beth's reaction, I believe it is genuine. However, if Mos implies that is not the correct version, how can Beth truly know?

      I'm just asking and not looking to start an argument. ::MonkeyWink::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Tater on March 04, 2008, 09:38:05 AM
      tonight Beth Holloway:

      (http://www.rtl.nl/shows/jensen/components/images/jensen-holloway.jpg)

      Peter R. de Vries appearance last night:

      this link should work in windows media player (http://www.rtl.nl/(channel=rtl5,progid=jensen,zone=rtlgemist.rtl.nl/jensen,vm=/shows/jensen/home/,ord=1204640457953)/system/video/wvx/components/shows/jensen/miMedia/2008/week10/ma_peter_r_de_vries.avi_plain.xml/796.wvx)

      if not link is also here:
      http://www.rtl.nl/shows/jensen/home/index.xml


      I sure wish I could understand what they are saying...:(


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Bearlyhere on March 04, 2008, 09:39:10 AM
      Has anyone heard from our Alabama monkeys?  Are they safe?


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: caesu on March 04, 2008, 09:40:21 AM
      other news media picked the NOVA item up about money wasting on government/state holiday trips to the antilles.

      http://www.elsevier.nl/nieuws/nederland/artikel/asp/artnr/195558/index.html
      http://www.elsevier.nl/opinie/commentaren/asp/artnr/195597/index.html
      http://www.trouw.nl/laatstenieuws/laatstenieuws/article931709.ece/Honderden_ambtenaren_naar_Antillen
      http://www.ad.nl/binnenland/2103828/Elke_twee_dagen_delegatie_naar_Antillen.html
      http://www.nieuws.nl/501318
      http://www.dag.nl/1062328/NIEUWS/Artikelpagina-Nieuws/Honderden-ambtenaren-naar-Antillen.htm
      http://www.telegraaf.nl/binnenland/3462254/_Ambtenaren_vliegen_zich_suf__.html?p=8,1

      friday/saturday the other items about corruption

      i hope it is about aruban justice department too.

      http://www.novatv.nl/


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: sb on March 04, 2008, 09:42:15 AM
      Jumping in quickly this morning to say that I have always felt like the deeper water was more likely. These folks are PROS, when they want someone to disappear, they DISAPPEAR.

      They have boats capable of reaching the REALLY deep water beyond any continental shelf.

      And I have no doubt that PVDS had access to connections that would avail him of such resources.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Rob on March 04, 2008, 09:43:11 AM
      update~
      Colombia accused Ecuador and Venezuela of having ties with the Farc and said the rebels had tried to buy uranium.
      The Colombian authorities said the information had come from documents found during Saturday's raid on the rebel camp in Ecuador.

      "When they mention negotiations for 50 kilos of uranium, this means that the Farc are taking big steps in the world of terrorism to become a global aggressor. We're not talking of domestic guerrilla but transnational terrorism," said Colombian national police chief Oscar Naranjo at a news conference in Bogota.

      Meanwhile, French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner said the death of rebel leader Reyes was "bad news", as he had been France's contact in its efforts to free Ms Betancourt.

      BBC


      Ms. Betancourt was freed last month IIRC. She was the former Vice Presidential candidate. If I remember all this correctly. She was the mother of the boy found in the orphanage and was thought to be also held captive. Seems Ms. Betancourt had a child with a rebel while in detainment.

      Again, If I remember this all correctly.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: caesu on March 04, 2008, 09:47:12 AM
      no Beth Holloway tonight at Pauw/Witteman.
      possibly later in the week.

      i would have been at the same time as Jensen anyway.
      so not convenient.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Destiny on March 04, 2008, 09:47:45 AM
      Has anyone heard from our Alabama monkeys?  Are they safe?

      Not in Alabama...but...*real* close...weather is bad...bad here...tornado boxes....need the rain tho...power still on...thank God/Goddess for UPS backup ;-)  Front yard looks like a lake!


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Castaglance on March 04, 2008, 09:48:04 AM
      snip: (is this how we shorten stacks?)

      Please don't stop posting.  Everyone messes posts up.  It's a requirement to be allowed to continue in the cage.  I got your message anyway.  I answered it didn't I?  We can all read monkey!

      Did you see the post to you the other night?  It was right after you left.


      [/quote]
      I try to pick up where I left off every night but, I must have missed that
      Thanks for responding Bearly.
      Rob:  were you waving your towel this week?


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Tater on March 04, 2008, 09:49:59 AM

      His working theory is CYAA.  (Cover your Aruban ass)

      If you were not the guy spouting off about protecting the suspect and tourism dollars, you might put it out there.  But if you are not allowed to have a theory and if you don't want to be a chandelier, you don't.

      Hi Bearlyhere, right, I get that part. But doesn't he own it to Beth and Dave and the people of Aruba (who are suffering according to some) to at some point explain how he knows Natalee is not alive. I would think that is the least he could do. Whether he tells us or not is one thing, but doesn't the family have a right to know what happened to Natalee. Those are her family members and they have a right to know and a vested interest... as I think they will find out when a civil suit turns that island upside down and inside out.

      And if Mos is never going to charge anyone, what difference does it make anyway?

      Hi Rob,
        I was under the assumption that Beth is confident she already knows what happened to Natalee.She even said she is at peace knowing now.I haven't seen that reply from Dave so don't know what he thinks.You're right,Mos owes them an explanation but then again,so did all the others before him and yet here we are today.Just out of curiosity,how will a civil suit turn the island upside down and inside out?

      Morning Tot,

      A civil suit would have a discovery phase that would introduce evidence uncovered by Beth and Dave's investigators. It might be in direct conflict with what the Aruba Prosecutors office has discovered and if there is new info there, it could logically be asked why that was not investigated by the ALE and Prosecutor. That would lead to the obvious charges of corruption and the ALE protecting some and never giving the legal system a chance to work.

      Not to be a thorn in anyone's side, but how can Beth know what happened to Natalee if it was based on the confession and that is not in line with the evidence according to Mos? Something is missing in my opinion.

      I watched the Godfather Peter R shows too and I saw Beth's reaction, I believe it is genuine. However, if Mos implies that is not the correct version, how can Beth truly know?

      I'm just asking and not looking to start an argument. ::MonkeyWink::

      Thankyou Rob for the answer.You have always been so kind on this forum and I for one appreciate that.I see what you are saying and I agree.It seem's to me that a civil suit could be brought against many and not just Yoran but I'm not an attorney so I don't know..You make alot of sense so thanks again for your response..Monkey Hugs


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Tater on March 04, 2008, 09:51:12 AM
      Jumping in quickly this morning to say that I have always felt like the deeper water was more likely. These folks are PROS, when they want someone to disappear, they DISAPPEAR.

      They have boats capable of reaching the REALLY deep water beyond any continental shelf.

      And I have no doubt that PVDS had access to connections that would avail him of such resources.

      Nodding my head... ::MonkeyWink::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: bleachedblack on March 04, 2008, 09:52:21 AM
      update~
      Colombia accused Ecuador and Venezuela of having ties with the Farc and said the rebels had tried to buy uranium.
      The Colombian authorities said the information had come from documents found during Saturday's raid on the rebel camp in Ecuador.

      "When they mention negotiations for 50 kilos of uranium, this means that the Farc are taking big steps in the world of terrorism to become a global aggressor. We're not talking of domestic guerrilla but transnational terrorism," said Colombian national police chief Oscar Naranjo at a news conference in Bogota.

      Meanwhile, French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner said the death of rebel leader Reyes was "bad news", as he had been France's contact in its efforts to free Ms Betancourt.

      BBC


      Ms. Betancourt was freed last month IIRC. She was the former Vice Presidential candidate. If I remember all this correctly. She was the mother of the boy found in the orphanage and was thought to be also held captive. Seems Ms. Betancourt had a child with a rebel while in detainment.

      Again, If I remember this all correctly.

      Carla Rojas is the woman you are thinking of I believe. She is a Columbian politician held captive by FARC who has since been freed. She had a child by one of her captors. As far as I know Betancourt is still held captive.

      http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5hiSN1WvBs9Hoc30lmsV3s1k1UOfg


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: caesu on March 04, 2008, 09:52:38 AM
      update~
      Colombia accused Ecuador and Venezuela of having ties with the Farc and said the rebels had tried to buy uranium.
      The Colombian authorities said the information had come from documents found during Saturday's raid on the rebel camp in Ecuador.

      "When they mention negotiations for 50 kilos of uranium, this means that the Farc are taking big steps in the world of terrorism to become a global aggressor. We're not talking of domestic guerrilla but transnational terrorism," said Colombian national police chief Oscar Naranjo at a news conference in Bogota.

      Meanwhile, French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner said the death of rebel leader Reyes was "bad news", as he had been France's contact in its efforts to free Ms Betancourt.

      BBC


      Ms. Betancourt was freed last month IIRC. She was the former Vice Presidential candidate. If I remember all this correctly. She was the mother of the boy found in the orphanage and was thought to be also held captive. Seems Ms. Betancourt had a child with a rebel while in detainment.

      Again, If I remember this all correctly.

      no Betancourt is still captive!
      last week others were freed and said she was very ill.
      but still captive.
      other releases are more unlikely after all the tension.

      Quote
      In January 2008, the Farc freed Clara Rojas and former congresswoman Consuelo Gonzalez.

      Another four hostages, who were released on 27 February, warned that Ms Betacnourt's health was fading fast and that they feared for her life.
      http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7266587.stm

      just few minutes ago:

      Colombia says wants Venezuela's president Chavez to be prosecuted by the International Criminal Court, The Hague. More soon.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Rob on March 04, 2008, 09:52:55 AM
      snip: (is this how we shorten stacks?)

      Please don't stop posting.  Everyone messes posts up.  It's a requirement to be allowed to continue in the cage.  I got your message anyway.  I answered it didn't I?  We can all read monkey!

      Did you see the post to you the other night?  It was right after you left.


      I try to pick up where I left off every night but, I must have missed that
      Thanks for responding Bearly.
      Rob:  were you waving your towel this week?
      [/quote]

      I saw your post Castaglance asking if I am from Pittsburgh and I am. Sorry I didn't reply. I apologize.

      I don't go into downtown unless I have to... and I don't usually participate in that kind of stuff. LOL

      Frank knew Myron died before I did and sent me an email with his condolences. Are you from the area too?

      I do have a few original Terrible towels around here somewhere.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Blonde on March 04, 2008, 09:53:19 AM
      If Natalee's remains have been recovered ... somebody need to tell Tim Miller.  As of February 27, 2008 ... Tim's impression was that there were 169 targets which still needed to be searched.

      Janet

      +++++++++++


      Tim Miller
      On the Record w/ Greta
      February 27, 2008


      MILLER: The report we got is the DNA that came back did not match Natalee's DNA and when we located that it looked like more than just a piece of cloth and I mean we, we felt as though we seen a skull in there. We got the Aruba authorities involved, they felt there was something in there, we dove on it and the thing is that's only 1 of over 170 targets out there we still have to investigate, so we've got a lot of work ahead of us.

      Transcript - Heli (RU)

      Maybe we aren't allowed to know just yet.  Maybe they need more confirmation.

      I don't believe they have found Natalee's remains. I see and visit with Beth's Mom at least once a week, usually more, and she could not keep that secret. There are plenty or real mysteries with which to deal. It would be great though. I have a feeling that Beth would be with her Mom if that had happened as well.
      I also don't think they found Natalee's remains but why would they even bother sending those 6 images to the FBI unless something was found?


      Sorry I must have missed this "those 6 images to the FBI " what got sent to the FBI


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Rob on March 04, 2008, 09:54:27 AM
      BB and caesu, that you for the correction.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: mojo on March 04, 2008, 09:56:50 AM
      update~
      Colombia accused Ecuador and Venezuela of having ties with the Farc and said the rebels had tried to buy uranium.
      The Colombian authorities said the information had come from documents found during Saturday's raid on the rebel camp in Ecuador.

      "When they mention negotiations for 50 kilos of uranium, this means that the Farc are taking big steps in the world of terrorism to become a global aggressor. We're not talking of domestic guerrilla but transnational terrorism," said Colombian national police chief Oscar Naranjo at a news conference in Bogota.

      Meanwhile, French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner said the death of rebel leader Reyes was "bad news", as he had been France's contact in its efforts to free Ms Betancourt.

      BBC


      Ms. Betancourt was freed last month IIRC. She was the former Vice Presidential candidate. If I remember all this correctly. She was the mother of the boy found in the orphanage and was thought to be also held captive. Seems Ms. Betancourt had a child with a rebel while in detainment.

      Again, If I remember this all correctly.

      Carla Rojas is the woman you are thinking of I believe. She is a Columbian politician held captive by FARC who has since been freed. She had a child by one of her captors. As far as I know Betancourt is still held captive.

      http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5hiSN1WvBs9Hoc30lmsV3s1k1UOfg

      no, betancourt is high profile. she ran for president.

      http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7276228.stm (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7276228.stm)

      .....Ecuador said the raid had scuppered a possible deal to free French-Colombian Farc hostage Ingrid Betancourt.

      President Rafael Correa said his government had been in "very advanced" talks to release the ex-Colombian presidential candidate, who has been held for six years, and other hostages.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Blonde on March 04, 2008, 09:57:07 AM

      His working theory is CYAA.  (Cover your Aruban ass)

      If you were not the guy spouting off about protecting the suspect and tourism dollars, you might put it out there.  But if you are not allowed to have a theory and if you don't want to be a chandelier, you don't.

      Hi Bearlyhere, right, I get that part. But doesn't he own it to Beth and Dave and the people of Aruba (who are suffering according to some) to at some point explain how he knows Natalee is not alive. I would think that is the least he could do. Whether he tells us or not is one thing, but doesn't the family have a right to know what happened to Natalee. Those are her family members and they have a right to know and a vested interest... as I think they will find out when a civil suit turns that island upside down and inside out.

      And if Mos is never going to charge anyone, what difference does it make anyway?

      Hi Rob,
        I was under the assumption that Beth is confident she already knows what happened to Natalee.She even said she is at peace knowing now.I haven't seen that reply from Dave so don't know what he thinks.You're right,Mos owes them an explanation but then again,so did all the others before him and yet here we are today.Just out of curiosity,how will a civil suit turn the island upside down and inside out?

      I think she said this after hearing Joran confess because she believed at least half of his story.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Castaglance on March 04, 2008, 09:57:30 AM
      snip: (is this how we shorten stacks?)

      Please don't stop posting.  Everyone messes posts up.  It's a requirement to be allowed to continue in the cage.  I got your message anyway.  I answered it didn't I?  We can all read monkey!

      Did you see the post to you the other night?  It was right after you left.


      I try to pick up where I left off every night but, I must have missed that
      Thanks for responding Bearly.
      Rob:  were you waving your towel this week?

      I saw your post Castaglance asking if I am from Pittsburgh and I am. Sorry I didn't reply. I apologize.

      I don't go into downtown unless I have to... and I don't usually participate in that kind of stuff. LOL

      Frank knew Myron died before I did and sent me an email with his condolences. Are you from the area too?

      I do have a few original Terrible towels around here somewhere.
      [/quote]

      Yes, just east... I checked for a travel show and we don't have one scheduled here (pout)
      You know the other job to have here? Weatherman, they never get it right either, lol.
      Nice to know such a smart cookie resides close-by. TY


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: caesu on March 04, 2008, 10:00:45 AM
      Quote
      Colombia says Venezuela`s Chavez helped leftisit rebels commit genocide (Reuters)

      very strong words from one country to another.
      wonder what Chaves response is. usually strong words too.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: private eye on March 04, 2008, 10:02:25 AM
      Has anyone heard anymore about the Patrick television appearance in Aruba?

      Not ignoring you, I just don't know.

      I didn't see anyone answer this yet and I just wanted you to know you are not invisible.

      Dads don't even know it is unusual to be invisible. I never take it like that:)


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Rob on March 04, 2008, 10:12:38 AM
      Thankyou Rob for the answer.You have always been so kind on this forum and I for one appreciate that.I see what you are saying and I agree.It seem's to me that a civil suit could be brought against many and not just Yoran but I'm not an attorney so I don't know..You make alot of sense so thanks again for your response..Monkey Hugs

      Tot, thanks you for the kind words, they mean a lot to me. Hugs back at ya!!!

      You know, there is one giant problem here and I have been very very reluctant to discuss it or broach it. But maybe now would be a good time.

      I have discussed this privately with a few friends and it's not a pleasant subject.

      It's the corruption angle.

      If the main suspects are ever charged they may claim that they told the truth and the Aruban Authorities have told them to keep their mouths shut and they would cover it up to protect tourism.

      Tacopina has said the Aruba Government is corrupt and so has everyone else.

      This is so Slootish and a built in excuse. There will be many that believe the Aruban Authorities are to blame and not Joran and Paulus.

      again, just my opinion, but anything is possible in the world of 'Rooba.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: ala_gunslinger on March 04, 2008, 10:13:14 AM
      Has anyone heard from our Alabama monkeys?  Are they safe?

      Not in Alabama...but...*real* close...weather is bad...bad here...tornado boxes....need the rain tho...power still on...thank God/Goddess for UPS backup ;-)  Front yard looks like a lake!

      Good morning all ya'll!

      In the 'north of Ham' here.  Just a few trees down, bass pond is now full!

      Destiny, you are right!  I love my full house UPS!!!!


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Kimmy53 on March 04, 2008, 10:15:31 AM
      Good Morning Monkeys!

      In the line of civil suits.....I'm wondering, Who ALL could be called to testify or give statements....  I would assume anyone the lawyers decided may have information.  It would be a virtual who's who - I'd love to see the likes of Dennis Jacobs, KJ, Steve Croes, Vanderstraten, etc, etc. be REALLY questioned - by REAL attorneys - asking REAL questions - They'd HAVE to answer too... I am sure they'd lie - but my thing is, they ALL wouldn't have their stories practiced, and they could be picked apart in short order. 


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: mojo on March 04, 2008, 10:16:04 AM
      Quote
      Colombia says Venezuela`s Chavez helped leftisit rebels commit genocide (Reuters)

      very strong words from one country to another.
      wonder what Chaves response is. usually strong words too.

      true enough, but it's gonna take evidence to get this ball rolling.

      http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7277313.stm (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7277313.stm)


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Castaglance on March 04, 2008, 10:19:15 AM
      Table I. Share of Responsibility for Non-Combatant Deaths and Forced Disappearances

                                     1993   1995  1996   1997   1998    1999     2000

      Guerrillas               28%    38%     36%     23.5%    21.3%  19.6%   16.3%

      Security Forces     54%   16%   18%     7.4%       2.7%     2.4%     4.6%

      Paramilitary          18%   46%   46%      69%        76%      78%    79.2%

      Source: William Avilés. 2003. "Paramilitarism and Colombia’s Low Intensity Democracy," Journal of Latin American Studies 38: 403. Derived from the Colombian Commission of Jurists.

      64 percent of the population lives below the poverty line, 23 percent in absolute poverty. Just under 2 percent of the population owns roughly 53 percent of the land. 11 million of the country’s 43,593,000 citizens do not meet their basic food requirements. Adequate health care, education, and employment are the exclusive perks of the privileged elite.
      http://upsidedownworld.org/main/content/view/607/61/

      wow, Forced Disappearances just like Aruba


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Tater on March 04, 2008, 10:21:33 AM
      Thankyou Rob for the answer.You have always been so kind on this forum and I for one appreciate that.I see what you are saying and I agree.It seem's to me that a civil suit could be brought against many and not just Yoran but I'm not an attorney so I don't know..You make alot of sense so thanks again for your response..Monkey Hugs

      Tot, thanks you for the kind words, they mean a lot to me. Hugs back at ya!!!

      You know, there is one giant problem here and I have been very very reluctant to discuss it or broach it. But maybe now would be a good time.

      I have discussed this privately with a few friends and it's not a pleasant subject.

      It's the corruption angle.

      If the main suspects are ever charged they may claim that they told the truth and the Aruban Authorities have told them to keep their mouths shut and they would cover it up to protect tourism.

      Tacopina has said the Aruba Government is corrupt and so has everyone else.

      This is so Slootish and a built in excuse. There will be many that believe the Aruban Authorities are to blame and not Joran and Paulus.

      again, just my opinion, but anything is possible in the world of 'Rooba.

      Hoo-boy!!! I have never thought about this from this angle.If true and this did happen,wouldn't the killers still be convicted and the rest of them just go down too?Would they be exhonerated just because they say they told the truth after we've seen Yoran on television lying over and over again?I could see this working for the Kalpoe's maybe, but not the Sloots?


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Rob on March 04, 2008, 10:24:41 AM
      Pinochet was charged with forced disappearances. Roughly 3000 political opponents. I would imagine that would be an issue the Hague would be interesting in if Chavez has committed the same crimes.

      Pinochet was charged with the disappearances of people that were thrown out of helicopters into the sea.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: private eye on March 04, 2008, 10:26:11 AM

      His working theory is CYAA.  (Cover your Aruban ass)

      If you were not the guy spouting off about protecting the suspect and tourism dollars, you might put it out there.  But if you are not allowed to have a theory and if you don't want to be a chandelier, you don't.

      Hi Bearlyhere, right, I get that part. But doesn't he own it to Beth and Dave and the people of Aruba (who are suffering according to some) to at some point explain how he knows Natalee is not alive. I would think that is the least he could do. Whether he tells us or not is one thing, but doesn't the family have a right to know what happened to Natalee. Those are her family members and they have a right to know and a vested interest... as I think they will find out when a civil suit turns that island upside down and inside out.

      And if Mos is never going to charge anyone, what difference does it make anyway?

      Hi Rob,
        I was under the assumption that Beth is confident she already knows what happened to Natalee.She even said she is at peace knowing now.I haven't seen that reply from Dave so don't know what he thinks.You're right,Mos owes them an explanation but then again,so did all the others before him and yet here we are today.Just out of curiosity,how will a civil suit turn the island upside down and inside out?

      I think she said this after hearing Joran confess because she believed at least half of his story.

      From what I understand, and women men have known since they were born are still hard for them to accurately understand, Beth now knows that Natalee died as a result of being in a coma in the presence of Joran, that Joran was responsible for her being disposed of because she was in a coma and he didn't want to be bothered with her, that as a result of being disposed of she is indeed dead, that Joran had sexual relations with Natalee while she was not capable of giving consent, that Joran has absolutely no remorse over his actions, that he does have remorse about his guilt becoming public knowledge, that Joran's parents have to be aware of all of this at the least, that they are assholes, bastards, heartless perverts, and that she can't understand what jollies that Anita gets off of Natalee's panties. That if she ever thought she had Joran's underwear, she would call a hazardous wasted disposal company to come remove them and not save them as Anita did to sniff and enjoy them, or to use them as a sexual stimulus to arouse her limp d*ck husband.

      Beth no longer has the nagging worry, yet ray of hope, that Natalee is alive and being held against her wishes as a sex slave. That Natalee is indeed in God's house, with absolutely no complaints.

      Beth knows that Aruba and the Dirty Dutch Locals accomplished the cover up, and that barring Arubagate, she is asking people to boycott all travel to Aruba. And she feels if the US is really going to have a war on drugs, then lets actually fight it, and help the native Arubians take their country back from the drug lords. Our covert needs, the needs of Europe, and the needs of South America shouldn't be met at the expense of the man on the street in Aruba. This is their life, and Human Rights are just as important as covert actions. In fact, if we addressed the human rights of the area, maybe, just maybe, we would not need all of the covert actions in the world.

      Last thought, over the top no doubt, as a nation we are sophisticated enough to know that the government has secrets that they cannot divulge to us. Why not fund these covert actions thru tax revenues instead of forcing our operatives to deal in cocaine or arms or whatever means of funding their own missions is profitable at the time. Tax revenues that they do not have to account to the public.

      I am sure Beth would articulate her feelings much gentler, articulate, and politically "corrector" than I, but I think this represents the gist of her thoughts about the filming and the sense of peace that they gave her. But this is JMO.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Tater on March 04, 2008, 10:26:27 AM
      Good Morning Monkeys!

      In the line of civil suits.....I'm wondering, Who ALL could be called to testify or give statements....  I would assume anyone the lawyers decided may have information.  It would be a virtual who's who - I'd love to see the likes of Dennis Jacobs, KJ, Steve Croes, Vanderstraten, etc, etc. be REALLY questioned - by REAL attorneys - asking REAL questions - They'd HAVE to answer too... I am sure they'd lie - but my thing is, they ALL wouldn't have their stories practiced, and they could be picked apart in short order. 


      And KOEN GOTTENBOS!!! I for one would like to see him on the stand answering a few questions!


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Destiny on March 04, 2008, 10:29:15 AM
      Has anyone heard from our Alabama monkeys?  Are they safe?

      Not in Alabama...but...*real* close...weather is bad...bad here...tornado boxes....need the rain tho...power still on...thank God/Goddess for UPS backup ;-)  Front yard looks like a lake!

      Good morning all ya'll!

      In the 'north of Ham' here.  Just a few trees down, bass pond is now full!

      Destiny, you are right!  I love my full house UPS!!!!

      Mornin' Ala...and all the Fine Fine Monkeys!

      Yeppers...UPS...only way to go on top of the mountain here....my pond never goes dry...it's fed by 5 artesian wells...have an overflow pipe that routes it back to the creek...

      Tot...got your flippers on yet..LOL..

      Back on topic...what I can't toss out of my mind...I was always under the assumption that the 6 photos had been sent to Dave by the Persistence...now we *know* that was not the case...the FBI sent the pix to Dave...what I want to know is this...WHY did the FBI do what the persistence was forbidden to do...we all *know* the pix were never meant to be posted...sh*t happens and they were....and we all *know* they caused quite a stir on multiple levels when they made their debut on the internet.....hmmmmmmm

      Is it just me...*why* did the FBI send the pix to Dave...when I thought it was the Persistence...I even had the idea that they were sent to Dave just to show him how clear/sharp photos, any photos taken could be...but them being sent to FBI *only*...well that blew that idea out of the water for me...more hmmmmmmm...


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Rob on March 04, 2008, 10:33:58 AM
      PI, thank you for your thoughts and feeling on Beth. With every post you make, We (I) get a better understanding of some of the dynamics and I truly appreciate that.

      One area I am confused about - That would be Natalee's underwear. Are you saying that Anita actually held (had) that garment in her possession?

      To me that would be off the charts!!!

      Can you please clarify that?


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: mrskub on March 04, 2008, 10:37:27 AM
      There is an article in Bon Dia today about Air Force 2. It's on page 3 of the i-paper. Can't understand any of it. LOL!

      http://www.bondia.com/index.php?option=com_flippingbook&book_id=2


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: private eye on March 04, 2008, 10:37:35 AM
      PI, thank you for your thoughts and feeling on Beth. With every post you make, We (I) get a better understanding of some of the dynamics and I truly appreciate that.

      One area I am confused about - That would be Natalee's underwear. Are you saying that Anita actually held (had) that garment in her possession?

      To me that would be off the charts!!!

      Can you please clarify that?

      I am sure someone on here can credential that better than I , but I THINK I have heard beth say that Anita described Natalee's underwear accurately, or at least one pair, and I am almost positive that I have read that on this site. I am sure Klaas or Janet can verify or correct.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Tater on March 04, 2008, 10:39:06 AM
      PI, thank you for your thoughts and feeling on Beth. With every post you make, We (I) get a better understanding of some of the dynamics and I truly appreciate that.

      One area I am confused about - That would be Natalee's underwear. Are you saying that Anita actually held (had) that garment in her possession?

      To me that would be off the charts!!!

      Can you please clarify that?

      Ditto!!!! How could she possibly have possession of them without that very thing being evidence against her unruly son and perverted husband?


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Rob on March 04, 2008, 10:40:27 AM
      PI, thank you for your thoughts and feeling on Beth. With every post you make, We (I) get a better understanding of some of the dynamics and I truly appreciate that.

      One area I am confused about - That would be Natalee's underwear. Are you saying that Anita actually held (had) that garment in her possession?

      To me that would be off the charts!!!

      Can you please clarify that?

      I am sure someone on here can credential that better than I , but I THINK I have heard beth say that Anita described Natalee's underwear accurately, or at least one pair, and I am almost positive that I have read that on this site. I am sure Klaas or Janet can verify or correct.

      as I recall, that was from when Beth and Greta went to the Sloot house of Horrors and Anita described the underwear, but I am unaware that she actually saw them or had them in her possession. It seems that Joran described them to her and she related the color and embroidery.

      Someone correct me if this is not correct.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Lala'sMom on March 04, 2008, 10:42:23 AM
      Has anyone heard from our Alabama monkeys?  Are they safe?

      Not in Alabama...but...*real* close...weather is bad...bad here...tornado boxes....need the rain tho...power still on...thank God/Goddess for UPS backup ;-)  Front yard looks like a lake!

      Good morning all ya'll!

      In the 'north of Ham' here.  Just a few trees down, bass pond is now full!

      Destiny, you are right!  I love my full house UPS!!!!

      Mornin' Ala...and all the Fine Fine Monkeys!

      Yeppers...UPS...only way to go on top of the mountain here....my pond never goes dry...it's fed by 5 artesian wells...have an overflow pipe that routes it back to the creek...

      Tot...got your flippers on yet..LOL..

      Back on topic...what I can't toss out of my mind...I was always under the assumption that the 6 photos had been sent to Dave by the Persistence...now we *know* that was not the case...the FBI sent the pix to Dave...what I want to know is this...WHY did the FBI do what the persistence was forbidden to do...we all *know* the pix were never meant to be posted...sh*t happens and they were....and we all *know* they caused quite a stir on multiple levels when they made their debut on the internet.....hmmmmmmm

      Is it just me...*why* did the FBI send the pix to Dave...when I thought it was the Persistence...I even had the idea that they were sent to Dave just to show him how clear/sharp photos, any photos taken could be...but them being sent to FBI *only*...well that blew that idea out of the water for me...more hmmmmmmm...

      Hi Destiny! Morning to the monkeys! 

      Maybe the FBI sent those pics to Dave to prove that Natalee was not in that cage.  Once they determined there was nothing there of any relevance to Natalee, they knew it would be necessary to tell Dave the truth...she was not there.  If that cage is indeed a "post office" for illegal activity I doubt the FBI cares.  That would not be their jurisdiction if you get my drift?


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: private eye on March 04, 2008, 10:44:15 AM
      I called a fellow Monkey and friend of Beth's and it was her understanding that it came up during the interview with Beth and Greta at the VDS off camera. I have never understood how that came up, and if it did, why Anita's teeth weren't slapped slam out of her mouth and the sweat slapped clean off the face and body of Paulus on the spot, but apparently cooler heads prevailed.


      And no doubt a big reason that porker who can't work his own fly was sweating like a pig.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Castaglance on March 04, 2008, 10:45:35 AM
      But the highlight was when Rodriguez Chacin pulled out a computer form a manila envelope (I kid you not) and said it was the one from 'Jabon', the infamous narco killed a few weeks ago in Merida. He said that in this computer he got as many convenient proofs against Colombian officials than what they were saying they found in the Reyes lap top. To a stunned audience he told that he did not reveal anything before, because of his "ethics", leaving the audience even more stunned. I mean, what ethics are we discussing here, those between two narco groups supporting each other and having rules of engagement, or the ethics that a chief security officer should have about the Venezuelan populace? Because if Rodriguez did really had such evidence for quite a while, it was his duty to warn Uribe of his staff dealing in drug trafficking. Unless Rodriguez was collabrating with the US or something in order to expose a major drug cartel. Of such a possibility he said nothing, just "ethics", even when a Colombian reporter asked him again why he did not reveal such crucial information. Yeah, right, the ethics of the mafia mob.....

      Perhaps the amusing detail of today was the admission by Kouchner that France was in direct contact with Reyes.
      http://daniel-venezuela.blogspot.com/2008/03/lady-does-protest-too-much-venezuela.html
      *the more I read the deeper the quicksand



      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Destiny on March 04, 2008, 10:47:17 AM
      Has anyone heard from our Alabama monkeys?  Are they safe?

      Not in Alabama...but...*real* close...weather is bad...bad here...tornado boxes....need the rain tho...power still on...thank God/Goddess for UPS backup ;-)  Front yard looks like a lake!

      Good morning all ya'll!

      In the 'north of Ham' here.  Just a few trees down, bass pond is now full!

      Destiny, you are right!  I love my full house UPS!!!!

      Mornin' Ala...and all the Fine Fine Monkeys!

      Yeppers...UPS...only way to go on top of the mountain here....my pond never goes dry...it's fed by 5 artesian wells...have an overflow pipe that routes it back to the creek...

      Tot...got your flippers on yet..LOL..

      Back on topic...what I can't toss out of my mind...I was always under the assumption that the 6 photos had been sent to Dave by the Persistence...now we *know* that was not the case...the FBI sent the pix to Dave...what I want to know is this...WHY did the FBI do what the persistence was forbidden to do...we all *know* the pix were never meant to be posted...sh*t happens and they were....and we all *know* they caused quite a stir on multiple levels when they made their debut on the internet.....hmmmmmmm

      Is it just me...*why* did the FBI send the pix to Dave...when I thought it was the Persistence...I even had the idea that they were sent to Dave just to show him how clear/sharp photos, any photos taken could be...but them being sent to FBI *only*...well that blew that idea out of the water for me...more hmmmmmmm...

      Hi Destiny! Morning to the monkeys! 

      Maybe the FBI sent those pics to Dave to prove that Natalee was not in that cage.  Once they determined there was nothing there of any relevance to Natalee, they knew it would be necessary to tell Dave the truth...she was not there.  If that cage is indeed a "post office" for illegal activity I doubt the FBI cares.  That would not be their jurisdiction if you get my drift?

      Slaps own forhead...duh....Thanks Lala's!


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Rob on March 04, 2008, 10:47:35 AM
      I called a fellow Monkey and friend of Beth's and it was her understanding that it came up during the interview with Beth and Greta at the VDS off camera. I have never understood how that came up, and if it did, why Anita's teeth weren't slapped slam out of her mouth and the sweat slapped clean off the face and body of Paulus on the spot, but apparently cooler heads prevailed.


      And no doubt a big reason that porker who can't work his own fly was sweating like a pig.

      also PI, if I recall correctly, Beth said after that meeting ~ she got what she came for. That was kind of vague and could imply that the she knew Natalee was at the house or that Anita or Paulus knew more than they disclosed.

      it's confusing.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Destiny on March 04, 2008, 10:49:17 AM
      I called a fellow Monkey and friend of Beth's and it was her understanding that it came up during the interview with Beth and Greta at the VDS off camera. I have never understood how that came up, and if it did, why Anita's teeth weren't slapped slam out of her mouth and the sweat slapped clean off the face and body of Paulus on the spot, but apparently cooler heads prevailed.


      And no doubt a big reason that porker who can't work his own fly was sweating like a pig.

       ::MonkeyHaHa::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: private eye on March 04, 2008, 10:49:39 AM
      PI, thank you for your thoughts and feeling on Beth. With every post you make, We (I) get a better understanding of some of the dynamics and I truly appreciate that.

      One area I am confused about - That would be Natalee's underwear. Are you saying that Anita actually held (had) that garment in her possession?

      To me that would be off the charts!!!

      Can you please clarify that?

      I am sure someone on here can credential that better than I , but I THINK I have heard beth say that Anita described Natalee's underwear accurately, or at least one pair, and I am almost positive that I have read that on this site. I am sure Klaas or Janet can verify or correct.

      as I recall, that was from when Beth and Greta went to the Sloot house of Horrors and Anita described the underwear, but I am unaware that she actually saw them or had them in her possession. It seems that Joran described them to her and she related the color and embroidery.

      Someone correct me if this is not correct.

      Now that may be more detail than I have or that we will ever know, whether she actually saw them or they were described to her by her son. It is even more perverse if Joran described the panties to his momma. What kind of conversation would result in such a declaration. It would be much more, don't laugh, logical, for Anita to have found the underwear. I do my daughter's laundry and those things don't take up a lot of space. In fact, you should try folding them:) I thought Joran claimed to collect them as trophies. So I assumed they were on his wall next to Guido's, Paulus, Depaak, Satish, and God knows who elses.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Rob on March 04, 2008, 10:53:53 AM

      Now that may be more detail than I have or that we will ever know, whether she actually saw them or they were described to her by her son. It is even more perverse if Joran described the panties to his momma. What kind of conversation would result in such a declaration. It would be much more, don't laugh, logical, for Anita to have found the underwear. I do my daughter's laundry and those things don't take up a lot of space. In fact, you should try folding them:) I thought Joran claimed to collect them as trophies. So I assumed they were on his wall next to Guido's, Paulus, Depaak, Satish, and God knows who elses.

      Well, Greta said she wanted to crawl under the table, so whatever happened it made even Greta uncomfortable.

      Anita and her new age hippism makes most uncomfortable. I can only imagine what the gerbils in her brain cavity really think of her.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: private eye on March 04, 2008, 10:54:02 AM
      I called a fellow Monkey and friend of Beth's and it was her understanding that it came up during the interview with Beth and Greta at the VDS off camera. I have never understood how that came up, and if it did, why Anita's teeth weren't slapped slam out of her mouth and the sweat slapped clean off the face and body of Paulus on the spot, but apparently cooler heads prevailed.


      And no doubt a big reason that porker who can't work his own fly was sweating like a pig.

      also PI, if I recall correctly, Beth said after that meeting ~ she got what she came for. That was kind of vague and could imply that the she knew Natalee was at the house or that Anita or Paulus knew more than they disclosed.

      it's confusing.

      I took that comment that she was looking at the guilty, maybe not all of the guilty, but she was on the right track, and her suspicions were verified. But I am a little uncomfortable speaking too much to what Beth felt or defining ambiguous statements, especially those made early on. Face it men and women look at the same film, hear the same words, and walk away with 2 completely different takes on the scene. Well , really, any 2 people for that matter.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Tater on March 04, 2008, 10:55:43 AM
      PI, thank you for your thoughts and feeling on Beth. With every post you make, We (I) get a better understanding of some of the dynamics and I truly appreciate that.

      One area I am confused about - That would be Natalee's underwear. Are you saying that Anita actually held (had) that garment in her possession?

      To me that would be off the charts!!!

      Can you please clarify that?

      I am sure someone on here can credential that better than I , but I THINK I have heard beth say that Anita described Natalee's underwear accurately, or at least one pair, and I am almost positive that I have read that on this site. I am sure Klaas or Janet can verify or correct.

      as I recall, that was from when Beth and Greta went to the Sloot house of Horrors and Anita described the underwear, but I am unaware that she actually saw them or had them in her possession. It seems that Joran described them to her and she related the color and embroidery.

      Someone correct me if this is not correct.

      Now that may be more detail than I have or that we will ever know, whether she actually saw them or they were described to her by her son. It is even more perverse if Joran described the panties to his momma. What kind of conversation would result in such a declaration. It would be much more, don't laugh, logical, for Anita to have found the underwear. I do my daughter's laundry and those things don't take up a lot of space. In fact, you should try folding them:) I thought Joran claimed to collect them as trophies. So I assumed they were on his wall next to Guido's, Paulus, Depaak, Satish, and God knows who elses.

      I've had these same thoughts too.What kind of mother sits and allows her son to even speak such things to her.My daughter is 24 years old yet to speak about sex or anything even close to it is forbidden because she just turns pale... :pale:


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: private eye on March 04, 2008, 10:56:37 AM
      For a guy, for me.  someone talking about someone I loved who is missing, a young girl's panties would be all I would need to have felt justified for ALMOST killing them. The red flag would have been waved and my thought process would have just shut down.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Ono on March 04, 2008, 10:57:56 AM
      From today's Wall Street Journal:

      "Chavez' 'War' Drums ":

      http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120459178078409043.html?mod=opinion_main_review_and_outlooks


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Rob on March 04, 2008, 10:59:51 AM
      For a guy, for me.  someone talking about someone I loved who is missing, a young girl's panties would be all I would need to have felt justified for ALMOST killing them. The red flag would have been waved and my thought process would have just shut down.

      The rage would have certainly been justified. I have no idea how Beth kept from killing Paulus on the spot. She's a cooler cookie than I. Paulus would be dead if Natalee was my daughter.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Tater on March 04, 2008, 11:00:01 AM

      Now that may be more detail than I have or that we will ever know, whether she actually saw them or they were described to her by her son. It is even more perverse if Joran described the panties to his momma. What kind of conversation would result in such a declaration. It would be much more, don't laugh, logical, for Anita to have found the underwear. I do my daughter's laundry and those things don't take up a lot of space. In fact, you should try folding them:) I thought Joran claimed to collect them as trophies. So I assumed they were on his wall next to Guido's, Paulus, Depaak, Satish, and God knows who elses.

      Well, Greta said she wanted to crawl under the table, so whatever happened it made even Greta uncomfortable.

      Anita and her new age hippism makes most uncomfortable. I can only imagine what the gerbils in her brain cavity really think of her.

      Who says those gerbils are in her brain cavity and not another?Ugh,this woman need therapy...I am so grossed out and horrified for Beth that had to sit within a couple of feet of her... :pukel: :puker:


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Castaglance on March 04, 2008, 11:02:22 AM
       aptly named site...
      The Devil's Excrement
      Observations focused on the problems of an underdeveloped country, Venezuela, with some serendipity about the world (orchids, techs, science, investments, politics) at large. A famous Venezuelan, Juan Pablo Perez Alfonzo, referred to oil as the devil's excrement. For countries, easy wealth appears indeed to be the sure path to failure. Venezuela might be a clear example of that.
      http://blogs.salon.com/0001330/
      3/4/08

      War of words escalates between Venezuela and Colombia, no bullets or guns, just hot air for now!

      Well, charges and countercharges flew tonight from all sides and things are getting to be almost funny, just hot air, no bullets, no guns, that is something we can not afford to have shortages of:

      --- The Government of Ecuador admitted that its Minister of Security had met with the dead guerrilla member Raul Reyes, which happens to be in the documents which they are calling fake.

      --- Now the President of Ecuador claims that he was negotiating the liberation of Ingrid Betancourt in Ecuador. Likely story given that he would not steal Chavez' thunder and that Chavez had asked last weekend for Marulanda to send her to a place where she would eb under good care. In any case, reyez clearly did not think much of her.

      ---And after the Colombian police charged that Chavez had paid US$ 300 million to the FARC for which they found evidence in a computer at the camp, the Venezuelan Government first says that it is all fabricated but then they come up with their own computer and accuse the Head of the Colombian police of being involved with drug trafficking. (His brother is in jail in Germany for drug trafficking). Of course they have had that computer since they detained drug lord "Jabon", but today was the first time they ever mentioned this computer. Weird, no?

      ---And the "small" camp in which Reyes lived with "small" weapons, according to Ecuador's Ambassador to Venezuela, occupied a full four hectares and had been in place for only three years. The Ecuadorian military was ordered off the area.

      ---Venezuela expelled Colombia's Ambassador to our country and Ecuador broke relationships with Colombia. Of course, Chavez does not dare brake commercial relations with Colombia as shortages will simply intensify to intolerable levels.

      ---And why did Chavez tell Uribe not to "dare do the same thing in Venezuela" that he did in Ecuador. The "same thing" would imply that there are camps here (of course there are, in Barinas and Apure state!) and the Colombian military knows where they are, which I am sure they do, as Chavez has called various leaders of the FARC over time and the Colombians know exactly where.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Rob on March 04, 2008, 11:05:07 AM

      Now that may be more detail than I have or that we will ever know, whether she actually saw them or they were described to her by her son. It is even more perverse if Joran described the panties to his momma. What kind of conversation would result in such a declaration. It would be much more, don't laugh, logical, for Anita to have found the underwear. I do my daughter's laundry and those things don't take up a lot of space. In fact, you should try folding them:) I thought Joran claimed to collect them as trophies. So I assumed they were on his wall next to Guido's, Paulus, Depaak, Satish, and God knows who elses.

      Well, Greta said she wanted to crawl under the table, so whatever happened it made even Greta uncomfortable.

      Anita and her new age hippism makes most uncomfortable. I can only imagine what the gerbils in her brain cavity really think of her.

      Who says those gerbils are in her brain cavity and not another?Ugh,this woman need therapy...I am so grossed out and horrified for Beth that had to sit within a couple of feet of her... :pukel: :puker:

      Tot, I grew up with a lot of that type of thinking. And it was hoorrrrible. Food co-ops, Helen Ready, NOW, yada yada yada. Hippies all over the house. Everyone protesting something...

      thank God it's over... and I do not look back on those times fondly LOLLOLOL


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: private eye on March 04, 2008, 11:07:02 AM
      I've got to run some errands, but I wanted to warn Kyle yesterday that when you post to such an interested, informed, and broadly experienced and skilled group as this, you never have any idea which word, which phrase, which though, or which sentence the posters are going to lock in on, and when they do, the poster is going to be amazed at the accuracy and breadth of the cage. When he was explaining the image enhancing courses he had taken, and I truly believe him, I value the formal edcuational process, and I am so hoping he will stay with us as a regualar poster, sometime he is going to throw something out and before he can blink, the image is already going to be enhanced by someone who may not know what course he was talking about, but by God they know where to turn to get the job done. It is humbling. I'll never forget my first few days on here.

       I was run out of dodge for an off the wall comment I thought no one would even notice. I made it because I was uncomfortable with the discussion of the day and my mind just wanted to retreat. But I was certainly wrong. EVERYBODY NOTICED IT AND DISAPPROVED BIG TIME:) This can be a scary cage:)


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Bladerunner on March 04, 2008, 11:09:11 AM
      I called a fellow Monkey and friend of Beth's and it was her understanding that it came up during the interview with Beth and Greta at the VDS off camera. I have never understood how that came up, and if it did, why Anita's teeth weren't slapped slam out of her mouth and the sweat slapped clean off the face and body of Paulus on the spot, but apparently cooler heads prevailed.


      And no doubt a big reason that porker who can't work his own fly was sweating like a pig.

      also PI, if I recall correctly, Beth said after that meeting ~ she got what she came for. That was kind of vague and could imply that the she knew Natalee was at the house or that Anita or Paulus knew more than they disclosed.

      it's confusing.

      Also, from that segment Greta and Beth are on the beach and are talking about how shocked and bewildered they were that Anita and maybe Paulus had gone into very graphic detail of what I'm assuming was Joran's story about what he did with Natalee in the backseat of the K2 car. "Very disturbing" was a comment that sticks in my head. If someone could pull that transcpript that would be helpful.

      Either way, I can't understand how you can be so restrained as to sit down and talk with the person that disposed of your daughter, in their home, which is very likely THE crime scene. Wow, amazing courage and fortitude!


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: SunnyinTX on March 04, 2008, 11:21:19 AM
      from Loving Natalee...pg 149

      the meeting in the sloots house with grata and Beth

      Now it's my turn. I have no intentions of a matching her good-boy remarks with good-girl comments. And cut to the chase. Graphically repeating the very words said by their son a couple of weeks ago in his statements made on June 9, 10 and 13.  The vile account that was read to me in the attorney gemeral's office. the sexually explicit words used by Joran to describe what he did to Natale. Calmer than I have ever been in my whole life and without blinking, I tell them which fingers he said he used.  Where he said he put them. How their son described my daughtes' public area, her underwear.  How Joran said she was falling asleep and waking up, falling asleep and waking up. I tell them of his conflicting stories of what happened, the different places he said it happened. Little beads of sweat form across Paulus' brow and forehead.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Tater on March 04, 2008, 11:30:06 AM
      from Loving Natalee...pg 149

      the meeting in the sloots house with grata and Beth

      Now it's my turn. I have no intentions of a matching her good-boy remarks with good-girl comments. And cut to the chase. Graphically repeating the very words said by their son a couple of weeks ago in his statements made on June 9, 10 and 13.  The vile account that was read to me in the attorney gemeral's office. the sexually explicit words used by Joran to describe what he did to Natale. Calmer than I have ever been in my whole life and without blinking, I tell them which fingers he said he used.  Where he said he put them. How their son described my daughtes' public area, her underwear.  How Joran said she was falling asleep and waking up, falling asleep and waking up. I tell them of his conflicting stories of what happened, the different places he said it happened. Little beads of sweat form across Paulus' brow and forehead.


      I am so getting into full blown heartburn again.Everytime I get angry this is what happens.I think I'll go figure out what's on the menu tonight for dinner after I reach for the Pepcid and do some praying.See ya'll in awhile..Monkey Hugs...


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Jerry from Ohio on March 04, 2008, 11:30:45 AM
       This only goes to show what type on mental mind set that the Van Der Slut family has for an operating system, being supposedly adults and educated professionals at that this shows just how mental illness and personality disorders not only RUN in this family  they are on a full fledged STAMPEDE !
        Be ware Aruba keep your children away from any of these sociopath persons .


      I called a fellow Monkey and friend of Beth's and it was her understanding that it came up during the interview with Beth and Greta at the VDS off camera. I have never understood how that came up, and if it did, why Anita's teeth weren't slapped slam out of her mouth and the sweat slapped clean off the face and body of Paulus on the spot, but apparently cooler heads prevailed.


      And no doubt a big reason that porker who can't work his own fly was sweating like a pig.

      also PI, if I recall correctly, Beth said after that meeting ~ she got what she came for. That was kind of vague and could imply that the she knew Natalee was at the house or that Anita or Paulus knew more than they disclosed.

      it's confusing.

      Also, from that segment Greta and Beth are on the beach and are talking about how shocked and bewildered they were that Anita and maybe Paulus had gone into very graphic detail of what I'm assuming was Joran's story about what he did with Natalee in the backseat of the K2 car. "Very disturbing" was a comment that sticks in my head. If someone could pull that transcpript that would be helpful.

      Either way, I can't understand how you can be so restrained as to sit down and talk with the person that disposed of your daughter, in their home, which is very likely THE crime scene. Wow, amazing courage and fortitude!


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: martini on March 04, 2008, 11:42:13 AM
      from Loving Natalee...pg 149

      the meeting in the sloots house with grata and Beth

      Now it's my turn. I have no intentions of a matching her good-boy remarks with good-girl comments. And cut to the chase. Graphically repeating the very words said by their son a couple of weeks ago in his statements made on June 9, 10 and 13.  The vile account that was read to me in the attorney gemeral's office. the sexually explicit words used by Joran to describe what he did to Natale. Calmer than I have ever been in my whole life and without blinking, I tell them which fingers he said he used.  Where he said he put them. How their son described my daughtes' public area, her underwear.  How Joran said she was falling asleep and waking up, falling asleep and waking up. I tell them of his conflicting stories of what happened, the different places he said it happened. Little beads of sweat form across Paulus' brow and forehead.


      I am so getting into full blown heartburn again.Everytime I get angry this is what happens.I think I'll go figure out what's on the menu tonight for dinner after I reach for the Pepcid and do some praying.See ya'll in awhile..Monkey Hugs...



      The underpants thing makes me sick too.

      Hang in there, when I get mad or angry I think of something silly just to release the steam.
      Here is a silly example~
      Joran's new name is Poopsie Picklesniffer~

      http://apps.scholastic.com/captainunderpants/NameGame/play.htm




      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Castaglance on March 04, 2008, 11:59:46 AM

      Snip:
      Hang in there, when I get mad or angry I think of something silly just to release the steam.
      Here is a silly example~
      Joran's new name is Poopsie Picklesniffer~

      http://apps.scholastic.com/captainunderpants/NameGame/play.htm



      [/quote]

      son of Paulie Pervdripper  *compliments of the paulie perv creator this morning


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: SunnyinTX on March 04, 2008, 12:05:59 PM
      from Loving Natalee...pg 149

      the meeting in the sloots house with Greta and Beth

      Now it's my turn. I have no intentions of a matching her good-boy remarks with good-girl comments. And cut to the chase. Graphically repeating the very words said by their son a couple of weeks ago in his statements made on June 9, 10 and 13.  The vile account that was read to me in the attorney general's office. the sexually explicit words used by Joran to describe what he did to Natalee. Calmer than I have ever been in my whole life and without blinking, I tell them which fingers he said he used.  Where he said he put them. How their son described my daughter's' pubic area, her underwear.  How Joran said she was falling asleep and waking up, falling asleep and waking up. I tell them of his conflicting stories of what happened, the different places he said it happened. Little beads of sweat form across Paulus' brow and forehead.

      oooppssss sorry for the typos...I think I  correct them all


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Tamikosmom on March 04, 2008, 12:06:18 PM
      http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/915059.stm

      Thursday, 7 September, 2000, 18:40 GMT 19:40 UK
      Drug submarine found in Colombia

      <snipped>


      Thank you Klaas.

      The protection of the tourist dollar that feeds an underground economy throughout the Carribean appears to have always been the motivation behind the coverup in the Natalee Holloway case.

      Justice for Natalee Holloway would have demanded ... not just accountability from Joran or Paulus for their roles but ... also the the Excelsior Casino and Carlos and Charlies where ...  as John Q. Kelly stated ... the entire chain of events that resulted in the demise of an 18 year old American citizen would never have happened if an underage Joran van der Sloot had not been allowed on the premises to gamble and drink.

      At 17 years of age ... could it be that Joran van der Sloot was  already an active contributor to that underground economy ... the underground economy that encompasses gambling ... drugs ... pornography ...

      Janet

      ++++++++++++


      CARLOS 'N CHARLIES

      Joran van der Sloot
      Suspect Statement
      June 9, 2005


      After that we drove straight to Carlos & Charlies. Deepak was the driver but I cannot remember now who was sitting beside him. I do not remember now if it was Satish or me. I estimate that we arrived at Carlos & Charlies between 00.15 and 00.30 hours. Deepak parked his car on the parking lot behind Carlos & Charlies and after that we walked into the building of Carlos & Charlies. I don't have to pay because I have a VIP pass. With my VIP pass Deepak and Satish were also allowed in.  

      To your question as to who gave me the VIP pass to Carlos & Charlies, I answer you that I got it through the office of Carlos & Charlies. I do not remember with the help of who I got the VIP pass. I got to Carlos & Charlies about one to three times a week.


      EXCELSIOR CASINO

      Beth Holloway
      LOVING NATALEE


      Page 39 - Following our brief conversation, we all walk immediately to the fron desk to ask about someone named Joran who is staying in the hotel and plays in the casino here.  The Holiday Inn night manager, Brenda, knows him by name.  "Oh! yes ... yes ... Joran.  He gambles in the Excelsior Casino here.  He likes to prey on young female tourists.  Especially the blonds.  He is tall.  Good-looking boy.  Like a Dutch marine."  My mouth drops wide open.  "Where is he from?" I ask her.  She replies.  "He lives in Aruba."  I stutter.  "He's ... he's not a tourist just here for the summer?"  "Non, non," she says.

      It takes a few moments to absorb this information.  The supposed tourist who befriended some of Natalee's classmates and who told them he was staying at their hotel lied tothem.  He isn't a tourist.  He isn't styaing here.


      RADISSON CASINO

      Deepak Kalpoe
      Suspect Statement
      June 13, 2005


      Andre asked me to come inside. I did go inside. I did not play, but did look at the cards of Joran and Guido.

      At some given moment in time a tourist who was sitting at Joran's table got angry. The tourist thought that we were looking at the cards of other players and signaling/deciding for Joran when he should play or not. It lead to a disagreement between Joran and the tourist. The manager of the Radisson Casino came over and everything calmed down. I drank about four "whisky coke" gedronken in the Radisson Casino. I now that Joran drank more because the waiters were constantly bringing him drinks.   I am not sure .what he was drinking. His drinks were of a yellow colour. I think it was “whisky soda" or 'Whisky water".


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Castaglance on March 04, 2008, 12:10:21 PM
      Looked it up...credit Bearly, love the new name you bestowed
      What new key needed do you think Caps refers to?


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Tamikosmom on March 04, 2008, 12:27:20 PM
      Dave Holloway/Tim Miller
      'The Abrams Report'
      October 24, 2005


      ABRAMS:  Dave, you are in Aruba searching for Natalee, but you‘re not just searching in random areas, right?  You‘re getting guidance as to where you should look? 

      D. HOLLOWAY:  Yes, for the first time we have gotten some guidance on what areas to focus our search efforts on. 

      ABRAMS:  And where is that coming from? 

      D. HOLLOWAY:  That‘s coming from Chief Dompig himself.

      ABRAMS:  So the chief is telling you, you know, look in a particular area.  Do you want to tell us where generally or how he‘s coming up with these areas? 

      D. HOLLOWAY:  Well, I know it‘s—of course, it‘s no secret now, he had indicated that we needed to center our efforts out in the ocean and that‘s what we‘re doing. 

      ABRAMS:  And why haven‘t the Aruban authorities looked in these areas? 

      D. HOLLOWAY:  Well, I don‘t think they have the capabilities of doing what we‘re trying to do.  We‘ve got some people from United States in that has sonar search capabilities and the Aruban authorities do not.  So that‘s what we‘re doing. 

      ABRAMS:  And how long are you going to stay there, Dave?

      D. HOLLOWAY:  Well I‘m scheduled to go back Thursday.  In fact, we—

      Tim Miller and I came over here to plan a search for the dump area and then after we met with the police authorities, we were redirected to search out in the ocean and I‘ve extended my trip now by seven more days, so I intend to come back possibly by Thursday.  Who knows?  So I think EquuSearch is going to stay to the end, so...

      http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9813142/


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: SunnyinTX on March 04, 2008, 12:27:40 PM
      Loving Natalee - pg. 148 - Greta, Beth at the sloots house.

      'Anita tells us all about Joran and what a good by he is. How smart he is. I let her go on and on, as this gives me time to listen, look, assess. As she continues, she begins to share with us what a difficult time they have had with him recently.  How he exhibits oppositional defiance and is disrespectful to his mother. How they are beginning to lose control of him as he sneaks out at night and comes and goes as he pleases. After about 30 minutes she concludes by telling us Joran is seeing a psychologist for his defiant behaviour.'

      Many parts of the books...both Beth's and Dave's have haunted me...but this in particular....Prelude to a Killer  I call it...these parents know their son is spiraling downwards and do what..other than send him to a psychologist? Who knows if he even went? How long? They give him his own apartment?  Sure get him out of your way!!  The father takes him to the casino and buys him porn..instead of controlling him..what kind of people are they...one hides her head in the sand and the other gives him the tools he needs to continue on the path to murder


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Rob on March 04, 2008, 12:34:22 PM
      Janet, if Dompig intentionally steered everyone away from the dump and to the sea all the while knowing Natalee was not in the sea - that would have to be the worst thing anyone has done yet. I can't think of too many things that would equal that.

      Wasting resources, placing lives in danger, raising the hopes of Natalee's family and friends.... it would be unconscionable. Beyond the pale.

      However, his own son tells the story of the sea also.

      As we know, Jamie Skeeters polygraphed Junior and he couldn't even get his name right. And I agree with your earlier statements that drug addicts are not precluded from the truth.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: caesu on March 04, 2008, 12:34:50 PM
      week before the attack resulting in the death of Raúl Reyes it was revealed that the Colombian government, with assistance of the U.S. federal government's FBI and DEA, had wiretapped several satellite phones purchased in Miami and then delivered to FARC forces in Southern Colombia.

      http://www.eltiempo.com/justicia/2008-02-20/ARTICULO-WEB-NOTA_INTERIOR-3964744.html
      http://www.elnuevoherald.com/noticias/septimo_dia/story/169043.html



      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Tater on March 04, 2008, 12:49:41 PM
      from Loving Natalee...pg 149

      the meeting in the sloots house with grata and Beth

      Now it's my turn. I have no intentions of a matching her good-boy remarks with good-girl comments. And cut to the chase. Graphically repeating the very words said by their son a couple of weeks ago in his statements made on June 9, 10 and 13.  The vile account that was read to me in the attorney gemeral's office. the sexually explicit words used by Joran to describe what he did to Natale. Calmer than I have ever been in my whole life and without blinking, I tell them which fingers he said he used.  Where he said he put them. How their son described my daughtes' public area, her underwear.  How Joran said she was falling asleep and waking up, falling asleep and waking up. I tell them of his conflicting stories of what happened, the different places he said it happened. Little beads of sweat form across Paulus' brow and forehead.


      I am so getting into full blown heartburn again.Everytime I get angry this is what happens.I think I'll go figure out what's on the menu tonight for dinner after I reach for the Pepcid and do some praying.See ya'll in awhile..Monkey Hugs...



      The underpants thing makes me sick too.

      Hang in there, when I get mad or angry I think of something silly just to release the steam.
      Here is a silly example~
      Joran's new name is Poopsie Picklesniffer~

      http://apps.scholastic.com/captainunderpants/NameGame/play.htm




      Lol...That makes me Flunky BananaFanny...I think I'm offended but I still think Paulas the Pervie is the hoot of the day... ::MonkeyLaugh::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Finbar on March 04, 2008, 01:01:51 PM
      Yes. Misdirection away from the landfill.

      How many of Aruba's investigators were at the dump helping Dave dig?

      Didn't they make him get permits or something?

      Covered up the holes that they had dug.

      Maybe the witness did not see them burying a body, but digging it back up to be moved. I think CAPS posted that. Insightful.

      The ocean makes sense, being on finite island land, but if willing conspirators kept moving and reburying the body - makes it difficult to find.

      Dompig gave many conflicting opinions on the case. Related to Kalpoe?


      Fin


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: dennisintn on March 04, 2008, 01:29:21 PM
      PI, thank you for your thoughts and feeling on Beth. With every post you make, We (I) get a better understanding of some of the dynamics and I truly appreciate that.

      One area I am confused about - That would be Natalee's underwear. Are you saying that Anita actually held (had) that garment in her possession?

      To me that would be off the charts!!!

      Can you please clarify that?

      I am sure someone on here can credential that better than I , but I THINK I have heard beth say that Anita described Natalee's underwear accurately, or at least one pair, and I am almost positive that I have read that on this site. I am sure Klaas or Janet can verify or correct.

      as I recall, that was from when Beth and Greta went to the Sloot house of Horrors and Anita described the underwear, but I am unaware that she actually saw them or had them in her possession. It seems that Joran described them to her and she related the color and embroidery.

      Someone correct me if this is not correct.

      rob, you're correct.  anita also described "points of interest" about natalee's body that jvds had "shared" with her.  greta said she felt like crawling under the table while anita was talking about this.  it makes my skin crawl just thinking about mothers and sons having that kind of conversation. 
      dennisintn


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Tamikosmom on March 04, 2008, 01:31:53 PM
      Janet, if Dompig intentionally steered everyone away from the dump and to the sea all the while knowing Natalee was not in the sea - that would have to be the worst thing anyone has done yet. I can't think of too many things that would equal that.
      Wasting resources, placing lives in danger, raising the hopes of Natalee's family and friends.... it would be unconscionable. Beyond the pale.

      However, his own son tells the story of the sea also.

      As we know, Jamie Skeeters polygraphed Junior and he couldn't even get his name right. And I agree with your earlier statements that drug addicts are not precluded from the truth.

      Rob ...

      Think about it ... if you were part of the Aruban coverup to protect Joran and Paulus van der Sloot ... would you steer Natalee Holloway's family in the direction that would expose the truth.

      Either you believe that Gerald Dompig and ... the Aruban police under Jan van der Straaten/Dennis Jacobs ... who were instrumental is directing Tim and Dave's attention away from the landfill and to the sea on the west side of the island ... are part of the the coverup that has denied Natalee Holloway justice or ... you do not.

      You know where I stand.

      Janet

      +++++++++++++

      http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2600.msg349370;topicseen#msg349370

      Quote from: klaasend on February 14, 2008, 01:11:08 AM

      Scared Monkeys Radio
      Dana Pretzer
      February 13, 2008


      <snipped>

      Dana: I'm going to throw out some names to you, I'm curious what you have to say .. Jossy Mansur

      Beth:  Absolutely heroic, what a man, my goodness, what a businessman he is, full of integrity, I stand by Jossy b/c he's an individual who stands for human rights and justice, gosh, what he did for me is take such a burden off of me going after these perpetrators, I felt like I had no other ally, he went out on a limb for no reason except doing the right thing, he has integrity and respect for human life,

      Dana: van der Stratten  

      Beth: He's corrupt to the core of his existence.  He just doesn't deserve any more words.


      Dave Holloway
      'The Abrams Report'
      October 24, 2005


      ABRAMS:  Dave, you are in Aruba searching for Natalee, but you‘re not just searching in random areas, right?  You‘re getting guidance as to where you should look? 

      D. HOLLOWAY:  Yes, for the first time we have gotten some guidance on what areas to focus our search efforts on. 

      ABRAMS:  And where is that coming from? 

      D. HOLLOWAY:  That‘s coming from Chief Dompig himself.

      ABRAMS:  So the chief is telling you, you know, look in a particular area.  Do you want to tell us where generally or how he‘s coming up with these areas? 

      D. HOLLOWAY:  Well, I know it‘s—of course, it‘s no secret now, the had indicated that we needed to center our efforts out in the ocean and that‘s what we‘re doing.
       
      <snipped>

      D. HOLLOWAY:  Tim Miller and I came over here to plan a search for the dump area and then after we met with the police authorities, we were redirected to search out in the ocean.

      http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9813142/


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Rob on March 04, 2008, 01:38:22 PM
      Janet, I'm not sure it matters what I believe. Just what Dave believes. He believes that Dompigs hands were tied by "higher ups"...

      I do not know if he gave Dave the info he needed or was jerking him around... I just don't know. I'm sorry.



      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: SunnyinTX on March 04, 2008, 01:39:46 PM
      PI, thank you for your thoughts and feeling on Beth. With every post you make, We (I) get a better understanding of some of the dynamics and I truly appreciate that.

      One area I am confused about - That would be Natalee's underwear. Are you saying that Anita actually held (had) that garment in her possession?

      To me that would be off the charts!!!

      Can you please clarify that?

      I am sure someone on here can credential that better than I , but I THINK I have heard beth say that Anita described Natalee's underwear accurately, or at least one pair, and I am almost positive that I have read that on this site. I am sure Klaas or Janet can verify or correct.

      as I recall, that was from when Beth and Greta went to the Sloot house of Horrors and Anita described the underwear, but I am unaware that she actually saw them or had them in her possession. It seems that Joran described them to her and she related the color and embroidery.

      Someone correct me if this is not correct.

      rob, you're correct.  anita also described "points of interest" about natalee's body that jvds had "shared" with her.  greta said she felt like crawling under the table while anita was talking about this.  it makes my skin crawl just thinking about mothers and sons having that kind of conversation. 
      dennisintn

      According to Beths book pg 149.......Beth described to the sloot what joran had said in his statements on June 9, 10 and 13 and read to her in the attorney general's office...Greta was shocked about things she heard in that meeting but has not talked about what it was in particular to the best of my knowledge


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Blonde on March 04, 2008, 01:40:46 PM
      I called a fellow Monkey and friend of Beth's and it was her understanding that it came up during the interview with Beth and Greta at the VDS off camera. I have never understood how that came up, and if it did, why Anita's teeth weren't slapped slam out of her mouth and the sweat slapped clean off the face and body of Paulus on the spot, but apparently cooler heads prevailed.


      And no doubt a big reason that porker who can't work his own fly was sweating like a pig.

      also PI, if I recall correctly, Beth said after that meeting ~ she got what she came for. That was kind of vague and could imply that the she knew Natalee was at the house or that Anita or Paulus knew more than they disclosed.

      it's confusing.
      \


      pg 148 Beth’s book:
      Now it’s my turn. I have no intention of matching her good-boy remarks with good-girl comments. And cut to the chase. Graphically repeating the very words said by their son a couple of weeks ago in his statements made on June 9, 10, and 13. The vile account that was read to me in the attorney general’s office. The sexually explicit words used by Joran to describe what he did to Natalee. Calmer than I have ever been in my whole life and without blinking, I tell them which fingers he said he used. Where he said he put them. How their son described my daughter’s pubic area, her underwear. How Joran said she was falling asleep and waking up, falling asleep and waking up. I tell them of his conflicting stories of what happened, the different places he said it happened. Little beads of sweat form across Paulus’s brow and forehead.



      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Tamikosmom on March 04, 2008, 01:41:41 PM
      I adhere to the theory that Natalee Holloway was placed in the landfill.

      The account of Junior ... the landfill witness ... is consistent and …. with much detail was conveyed by his brother to the ALE in the first week of the investigation.  Almost two month later the same story was related to Natalee's family.  Junior provided a description of the vehicle and … he recorded a licence (tag) number. Junior identifies the location where he observed Natalee was placed and .. he described the child’s plastic pool which was used as a covering and ... the plastic pool was recovered in that location by TES/Dave Holloway almost two months later.
       
      I comprehend that Junior failed the polygraph test administered by Jamie Skeeter. However … it should be noted that Junior had volunteered to take that test and … it is known that those who are afflicted with mental disorders/addictions are often very poor candidates for lie detector tests. Also … if Junior feared intimidation by the “powers that be” in Aruba … again the outcome of the polygraph would be considered inconclusive when the stress factor is considered.
       
      I believe it is possible that Natalee was moved from the landfill following Junior's observation.
       
      Junior's brother came forward to authorities on June 3, 2005 … two days after Junior's observation at the landfill on June 1, 2005.  When Junior came forward to Beth Twitty two months later with the same story .... ALE claimed that authorities had gone to the landfill and checked out Junior's original story and .... found nothing. I contend that .... knowing the exact location and .... after only two days had passed since the observation ... the "powers that be" would have had no difficulty locating Natalee.. I suspect that on June 3, 2005 … Natalee could have been moved as a result of Junior's observation.

      I find it highly suspicious that Junior's brother came forward to authorities on June 3, 2005 regarding the happening which Junior had observed at the landfill on June 1, 2005 and ..... the Holloway and Twitty's did not find out about this witness until Junior personally contacted them two months later.
       
      Inquiring minds want to know ... WHY?

      Janet


      +++++++++++

      Edwin Comenencia
      Associated Press
      August 1, 2005


      Police spokesman Edwin Comenencia said police searched the landfill after receiving the tip days after Holloway's disappearance May 30th, but found nothing.
      http://www.wtvynews4.com/home/headlines/1756907.html


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Rob on March 04, 2008, 01:46:06 PM
      I was also wondering how much money will need to be raised to get another ship to Aruba to complete the target search.

      Maybe OE will have some info when he returns.

      And once the money is raised, will the new ship depart immediately? Will all targets be searched? and would there be any reason to abandon a future search? (of course - should no unforeseen circumstances).

      If the next search will not take place until summer, that leaves a substantial amount of time to raise the needed funds.

      I can do a turkey bake... maybe!!!


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Tamikosmom on March 04, 2008, 01:46:38 PM
      Janet, I'm not sure it matters what I believe. Just what Dave believes. He believes that Dompigs hands were tied by "higher ups"...

      I do not know if he gave Dave the info he needed or was jerking him around... I just don't know. I'm sorry.



      Rob ... we are all speculating.

      My theory in no way undermines the sacrificial efforts of the crew of the Persistance.  I trust that this huge undertaking must be deriving from a foundation ... a foundation that implies that Natalee was taken out to sea in this particular area ... a foundation of info that we are not prvy too.

      If Natalee's remains are recovered ... returned to her loving family ... returned to her country ... I will gladly concede that my theory was focused in the wrong direction.

      However ... until then ...

      Janet


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Rob on March 04, 2008, 01:47:43 PM
      Thank you Blonde  ::MonkeyWink::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Rob on March 04, 2008, 01:56:50 PM
      I adhere to the theory that Natalee Holloway was placed in the landfill.

      The account of Junior ... the landfill witness ... is consistent and …. with much detail was conveyed by his brother to the ALE in the first week of the investigation.  Almost two month later the same story was related to Natalee's family.  Junior provided a description of the vehicle and … he recorded a licence (tag) number. Junior identifies the location where he observed Natalee was placed and .. he described the child’s plastic pool which was used as a covering and ... the plastic pool was recovered in that location by TES/Dave Holloway almost two months later.
       
      I comprehend that Junior failed the polygraph test administered by Jamie Skeeter. However … it should be noted that Junior had volunteered to take that test and … it is known that those who are afflicted with mental disorders/addictions are often very poor candidates for lie detector tests. Also … if Junior feared intimidation by the “powers that be” in Aruba … again the outcome of the polygraph would be considered inconclusive when the stress factor is considered.
       
      I believe it is possible that Natalee was moved from the landfill following Junior's observation.
       
      Junior's brother came forward to authorities on June 3, 2005 … two days after Junior's observation at the landfill on June 1, 2005.  When Junior came forward to Beth Twitty two months later with the same story .... ALE claimed that authorities had gone to the landfill and checked out Junior's original story and .... found nothing. I contend that .... knowing the exact location and .... after only two days had passed since the observation ... the "powers that be" would have had no difficulty locating Natalee.. I suspect that on June 3, 2005 … Natalee could have been moved as a result of Junior's observation.

      I find it highly suspicious that Junior's brother came forward to authorities on June 3, 2005 regarding the happening which Junior had observed at the landfill on June 1, 2005 and ..... the Holloway and Twitty's did not find out about this witness until Junior personally contacted them two months later.
       
      Inquiring minds want to know ... WHY?

      Janet


      +++++++++++

      Edwin Comenencia
      Associated Press
      August 1, 2005


      Police spokesman Edwin Comenencia said police searched the landfill after receiving the tip days after Holloway's disappearance May 30th, but found nothing.
      http://www.wtvynews4.com/home/headlines/1756907.html


      Janet, I DO agree on some areas... and you are my favorite speculator of all time. The license plate number was registered to VD Straaten. And a bloody towel was found in the area behind the seat if I recall that correctly.

      I concede that Junior took the polygraph willingly, he just couldn't get one answer right and Jamie discounted him. I know this because he shared that with me before he died. And I am sure I have told you that also... LOL.

      The one thing that has me discounting the landfill is the fact that Aruba is an island and she could be found in a landfill and I just don't see Paulus taking that chance. To this day - he seems confidant she is gone and not likely to be recovered. That worries me, greatly.

      If Dompig, VD Straaten and et al really did do all that - I say line em up and shoot them. I'll buy the bullets and send the bill to their families Chinese style.

      I wonder why Junior's brother was not polygraphed? or if he was - Jamie never mentioned it.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Rob on March 04, 2008, 02:02:13 PM
      Seems Bush made a statement - He has spoken to Uribe and is concerned about the incursions and narco-terrorists. That seems to be all he said...

      All paraphrased.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Tater on March 04, 2008, 02:04:16 PM
      Rob,
         Maybe she was in the landfill until Tim and Dave had been successfully redirected to the sea? Just following along here...


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Rob on March 04, 2008, 02:10:17 PM
      Rob,
         Maybe she was in the landfill until Tim and Dave had been successfully redirected to the sea? Just following along here...

      could be Tot, could be. No one really knows. We all just want Natalee found. If that's the case, all that is needed is one person to make that declaration and the case would be solved.

      It boggles my mind that not one person will come forward and tell the truth.

      The Mansur Brothers donated equipment to search the landfill and they probably wouldn't have done that if they didn't believe she was in there and they sincerely tried to help in my opinion.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: BUCKSHOT on March 04, 2008, 02:18:04 PM
      I adhere to the theory that Natalee Holloway was placed in the landfill.

      The account of Junior ... the landfill witness ... is consistent and …. with much detail was conveyed by his brother to the ALE in the first week of the investigation.  Almost two month later the same story was related to Natalee's family.  Junior provided a description of the vehicle and … he recorded a licence (tag) number. Junior identifies the location where he observed Natalee was placed and .. he described the child’s plastic pool which was used as a covering and ... the plastic pool was recovered in that location by TES/Dave Holloway almost two months later.
       
      I comprehend that Junior failed the polygraph test administered by Jamie Skeeter. However … it should be noted that Junior had volunteered to take that test and … it is known that those who are afflicted with mental disorders/addictions are often very poor candidates for lie detector tests. Also … if Junior feared intimidation by the “powers that be” in Aruba … again the outcome of the polygraph would be considered inconclusive when the stress factor is considered.
       
      I believe it is possible that Natalee was moved from the landfill following Junior's observation.
       
      Junior's brother came forward to authorities on June 3, 2005 … two days after Junior's observation at the landfill on June 1, 2005.  When Junior came forward to Beth Twitty two months later with the same story .... ALE claimed that authorities had gone to the landfill and checked out Junior's original story and .... found nothing. I contend that .... knowing the exact location and .... after only two days had passed since the observation ... the "powers that be" would have had no difficulty locating Natalee.. I suspect that on June 3, 2005 … Natalee could have been moved as a result of Junior's observation.

      I find it highly suspicious that Junior's brother came forward to authorities on June 3, 2005 regarding the happening which Junior had observed at the landfill on June 1, 2005 and ..... the Holloway and Twitty's did not find out about this witness until Junior personally contacted them two months later.
       
      Inquiring minds want to know ... WHY?

      Janet


      +++++++++++

      Edwin Comenencia
      Associated Press
      August 1, 2005


      Police spokesman Edwin Comenencia said police searched the landfill after receiving the tip days after Holloway's disappearance May 30th, but found nothing.
      http://www.wtvynews4.com/home/headlines/1756907.html


      Janet, I DO agree on some areas... and you are my favorite speculator of all time. The license plate number was registered to VD Straaten. And a bloody towel was found in the area behind the seat if I recall that correctly.

      I concede that Junior took the polygraph willingly, he just couldn't get one answer right and Jamie discounted him. I know this because he shared that with me before he died. And I am sure I have told you that also... LOL.

      The one thing that has me discounting the landfill is the fact that Aruba is an island and she could be found in a landfill and I just don't see Paulus taking that chance. To this day - he seems confidant she is gone and not likely to be recovered. That worries me, greatly.

      If Dompig, VD Straaten and et al really did do all that - I say line em up and shoot them. I'll buy the bullets and send the bill to their families Chinese style.

      I wonder why Junior's brother was not polygraphed? or if he was - Jamie never mentioned it.

      The license plate number was registered to VD Straaten. And a bloody towel was found in the area behind the seat if I recall that correctly.

      Rob --

      Is this fact ??

      BUCKSHOT


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Kimmy53 on March 04, 2008, 02:22:08 PM
      Rob,
         Maybe she was in the landfill until Tim and Dave had been successfully redirected to the sea? Just following along here...

      could be Tot, could be. No one really knows. We all just want Natalee found. If that's the case, all that is needed is one person to make that declaration and the case would be solved.

      It boggles my mind that not one person will come forward and tell the truth.

      The Mansur Brothers donated equipment to search the landfill and they probably wouldn't have done that if they didn't believe she was in there and they sincerely tried to help in my opinion.

      I have always thought that in the very least, some of Natalee's personal affects were in the landfill.  I believe that is what was delivered by Paulus to Joran at the Raquet Club (In his duffle) was her clothes/shoes or whatever else she may have had.

      IIRC, Paulus & Joran can't agree whether Paulus did or didn't bring Joran that bag. 

      The tiny descrepancies are very telling to me.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Rob on March 04, 2008, 02:25:35 PM
      Buckshot, it's around somewhere. That's the way I remember it. It was a small white pick-up (possibly a Toyota) and the license plate was registered to the ALE and it was the truck assigned to Van Der Straaten. That's a little bit clearer.

      Maybe someone has that info stored.

      that's the way I remember it anyway... and around the same time, someone came forward and said that someone stole a white trash bag from the Hyatt beach area.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: ala_gunslinger on March 04, 2008, 02:30:52 PM
      Rob, no need to buy those bullets!  I already have them made!


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Rob on March 04, 2008, 02:32:28 PM
      Buckshot, a bloody towel could be anything. We all see how they drive on Aruba and the towel could have nothing to so with Natalee.

      I just remember it being talked about all the way back when.

      The towel, IIRC, was found behind the bench seat in the front of the cab.

      what is intriguing about this is there was another witness that places a white pick-up at the side of the Holiday Inn or Marriott and there is a white pick-up seen at the dump.

      The person described by Junior was a partially naked *blonde* woman and he recalled seeing her breast as the fabric / sheet moved away from her body.

      It was later reported by someone that Junior saw a potted palm tree and it was not Natalee. >>>shrugs shoulders<<<

      Again, this is just the way I remember it and please forgive me if I have gotten some of the details wrong.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Rob on March 04, 2008, 02:33:44 PM
      Rob, no need to buy those bullets!  I already have them made!

      sh*t I almost forgot!!! ::MonkeyHaHa::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Bladerunner on March 04, 2008, 02:39:35 PM
      When does part 2 of the Telearuba show air, is it tomorrow or Friday??   


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: klaasend on March 04, 2008, 02:48:32 PM
      When does part 2 of the Telearuba show air, is it tomorrow or Friday??   

      Thursday  ::MonkeyHaHa::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Windsor on March 04, 2008, 02:51:22 PM

      snip

      I can do a turkey bake... maybe!!!

      Rob -- I just had to log in.  I'm a huge lurker, not a poster, but I seem to remember the funniest story ever about a turkey.  Am I right???


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Rob on March 04, 2008, 02:55:49 PM

      snip

      I can do a turkey bake... maybe!!!

      Rob -- I just had to log in.  I'm a huge lurker, not a poster, but I seem to remember the funniest story ever about a turkey.  Am I right???

      yes, you are right Windsor... and you should post more.  :joker:


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Bladerunner on March 04, 2008, 02:58:05 PM
      When does part 2 of the Telearuba show air, is it tomorrow or Friday??   

      Thursday  ::MonkeyHaHa::

      Right....because it's only....Tuesday!!      ::MonkeyConfused::



      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Shell on March 04, 2008, 03:17:45 PM
      Buckshot, it's around somewhere. That's the way I remember it. It was a small white pick-up (possibly a Toyota) and the license plate was registered to the ALE and it was the truck assigned to Van Der Straaten. That's a little bit clearer.

      Maybe someone has that info stored.

      that's the way I remember it anyway... and around the same time, someone came forward and said that someone stole a white trash bag from the Hyatt beach area.

      It must have been a special kind of white trash bag for someone to even notice it was missing.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Windsor on March 04, 2008, 03:20:01 PM

      snip

      I can do a turkey bake... maybe!!!

      Rob -- I just had to log in.  I'm a huge lurker, not a poster, but I seem to remember the funniest story ever about a turkey.  Am I right???

      yes, you are right Windsor... and you should post more.  :joker:

      I'm really a Shango/Simianhead.  I love reading that thread.  It's starting to make sense! 

      Whenever I can, I bring up Natalee's name.  I recently met a travel agent, and joked, "Oh, you don't book trips to Aruba, do you?"  She asked, "Why not?"  "Because of what happened to Natalee Holloway and the corruption on that island."  She tried to tell me it's a safe and pretty island.  I said, "Nah-uh, I've been there."  Well, I won't get into the words we exchanged, but she eventually said, "Oh, I see so and so, I need to go talk to her."  Well, I tried.  My friends always ask me what's going on in the case whenever they hear something in the media about it.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: martini on March 04, 2008, 03:21:04 PM
      Hi Monkeys~
      I have a question about the prisons in Aruba and Curacao. I seem to recall a prison you tube video of a rap song done in the Curacao prison. I tried to find the video, no luck. In researching it, there was something about removing the lap tops from the prisoners?
      My question is..Are the prisons in the Netherland Antilles different from the USA?

      A little off topic but this was e-mailed to me today~
      Sheriff Joe Arpaio (In Arizona) who created the 'Tent City Jail':

       

      He has jail meals down to 40 cents a serving and charges the inmates for them.
      He stopped smoking and porno magazines in the jails.
      Took away their weights Cut off all but 'G' movies.
      He started chain gangs so the inmates could do free work on county and city projects.
      Then He Started Chain Gangs For Women So He
      Wouldn't Get Sued For Discrimination.
      He took away cable TV Until he found out there was a Federal Court Order that Required Cable TV For Jails so He Hooked Up The Cable TV Again Only Let In the Disney Channel And The Weather Channel. When asked why the weather channel He Replied, so They Will Know How Hot Its Gonna Be While they Are Working ON My Chain Gangs.
      He Cut Off Coffee Since It Has Zero Nutritional Value as well.  ::MonkeyTongue::



      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: martini on March 04, 2008, 03:35:31 PM
       found it~
      38 Laptops confiscated in Bon Futuro

      WILLEMSTAD – Bon Futuro-prison management confiscated 38 laptops yesterday. Reason for this action was the publication of a videoclip inside the prison walls of- and by the prisoners on several websites.

      http://www.dumpert.nl/mediabase/12128/e7498cc9/index.html



      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Shell on March 04, 2008, 03:38:28 PM

      It creeps me out that Joran has shown no emotion about any of this, except anger. He has not shed a tear during all his interviews that I have seen. No remorse for leaving Natalee on the beach (if that were true). I think there was a report of him crying in jail. Other than that, he is eerily unfeeling about the situation, except as it pertains to himself. I know I am repeating the thoughts that have been expressed by others here before. I can only conclude an innocent person, a normal person, would show some feelings of regret and remorse.
       ::MonkeyNoNo::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: private eye on March 04, 2008, 03:43:40 PM
      How do you reconcile the first few days of the case, with Anita having such accurate knowledge of Natalee's panties and pubic area, with his confession to Patrick?


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: private eye on March 04, 2008, 03:45:26 PM
      He spent a lot of time around her pubic area, including really studying her panties to have been on the beach and then to have her start shaking and having seizures, and the moon had to be exceptionally bright.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: private eye on March 04, 2008, 03:49:27 PM
      And when Paulus was sweating, shaking, and squirming, was he actually doing anything to defend the boy, Joran, or was he sitting there a spectator? Was he nervous from covering up for the boy or was he guilty as sin and overwhelmed by fear of the consequences of getting caught and the shame of his own actions? Anita doesn't sweat or squirm when she is covering for Joran. She has absolutely no shame or guilt, because she is protecting her son. She is not ashamed of her own actions or worried about her own guilt.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Windsor on March 04, 2008, 03:51:42 PM
      He spent a lot of time around her pubic area, including really studying her panties to have been on the beach and then to have her start shaking and having seizures, and the moon had to be exceptionally bright.

      I don't believe they were on the beach.  If they were on the beach, they were in a beachfront hotel room.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: private eye on March 04, 2008, 03:53:15 PM
      Anita, you know Paulus better than any of us. Was his the behaviour of a fathert protecting his son, or was his the behavior of a guilty and embarrassed man? Or do you allow him to be with young women if recants the escapades to you as part of your sex life? Are you OK with him having sex with Joran? Do you have sex with Joran as well? Stop all of these rumors and just explain the dynamics of your family to us.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Nut44x4 on March 04, 2008, 03:54:18 PM
      http://www.coolaruba.com/component/option,com_gallery2/Itemid,28/?g2_itemId=293547


      photos from the Teleruba Show with Patrick


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: AZSunny on March 04, 2008, 03:54:53 PM
      Hi Monkeys~
      I have a question about the prisons in Aruba and Curacao. I seem to recall a prison you tube video of a rap song done in the Curacao prison. I tried to find the video, no luck. In researching it, there was something about removing the lap tops from the prisoners?
      My question is..Are the prisons in the Netherland Antilles different from the USA?

      A little off topic but this was e-mailed to me today~
      Sheriff Joe Arpaio (In Arizona) who created the 'Tent City Jail':

       

      He has jail meals down to 40 cents a serving and charges the inmates for them.
      He stopped smoking and porno magazines in the jails.
      Took away their weights Cut off all but 'G' movies.
      He started chain gangs so the inmates could do free work on county and city projects.
      Then He Started Chain Gangs For Women So He
      Wouldn't Get Sued For Discrimination.
      He took away cable TV Until he found out there was a Federal Court Order that Required Cable TV For Jails so He Hooked Up The Cable TV Again Only Let In the Disney Channel And The Weather Channel. When asked why the weather channel He Replied, so They Will Know How Hot Its Gonna Be While they Are Working ON My Chain Gangs.
      He Cut Off Coffee Since It Has Zero Nutritional Value as well.  ::MonkeyTongue::



      Martini...it is all true!!  Huge ego, but he gets things done!


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Shell on March 04, 2008, 03:55:58 PM
      How do you reconcile the first few days of the case, with Anita having such accurate knowledge of Natalee's panties and pubic area, with his confession to Patrick?

      Anita knows what went down that night.
      She probably saw the panties. I have always felt like Natalee was on the Sloot property at some point that evening.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Windsor on March 04, 2008, 03:56:01 PM
      back to workin' and lurkin'


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: private eye on March 04, 2008, 03:56:37 PM
      What say you Anita? That is personal and private? I would imagine it is if that is true. Let's see, Paulus, Joran, Depaak, and Satish that we know of in one bed possibly. How cozy a picture is that. And tell us about Guido? How do Guido and Paulus get along?


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Magnolia on March 04, 2008, 03:56:59 PM
      Buckshot, it's around somewhere. That's the way I remember it. It was a small white pick-up (possibly a Toyota) and the license plate was registered to the ALE and it was the truck assigned to Van Der Straaten. That's a little bit clearer.

      Maybe someone has that info stored.

      that's the way I remember it anyway... and around the same time, someone came forward and said that someone stole a white trash bag from the Hyatt beach area.

      It must have been a special kind of white trash bag for someone to even notice it was missing.

      A witness saw it being grabbed from one of the large trash cans.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: JE on March 04, 2008, 03:58:02 PM
      He spent a lot of time around her pubic area, including really studying her panties to have been on the beach and then to have her start shaking and having seizures, and the moon had to be exceptionally bright.

      I doubt that there was a bright moon. Joran said somewhere that there were no stars maybe it was clouded. Also in one of satishe's PV's they asked him about the light level in the car and about weather conditions.

      from june 30

      On your question of when Deepak, Joran and I were with Natalee on, May 30, 2005, in the nighttime hours, wasn’t it too dark in the car for Joran to see the color of the missing girl’s panties, I can only answer this:
      There was enough light in the car of Deepak. Joran must have taken off the clothing of the girl so that he could see the color of the panties she wore.

      from june 3

      On your question of what it was like on Monday, May 30, 2005, in the nighttime hours, when Deepak and I dropped off Joran and the missing American girl north of the Marriott, I can answer you the following:
      I cannot you say what it was like because I sat in my brother Deepak’s car.  I also didn’t look up to see if there were clouds.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: private eye on March 04, 2008, 04:00:13 PM
      I am with you. The first days of the case it was probably almost broken, and the most truth was probably spoken.

      Didn't Mos re-arrest the boys the day the car was delivered to Patrick? Before filming could begin?


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Kat_Gram on March 04, 2008, 04:00:22 PM
      What was the sum / slant of the Teleruba program ?
      Was it to trash anyone but Joran ? ie Patrick ?
      My gut feeling is that if Mother Theresa were alive and made a comment favoring the family or Natalee, she would have " something"  in her background to disrespect and the answers would lie in Calcutta.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: jackb on March 04, 2008, 04:01:30 PM
      snip: (is this how we shorten stacks?)

      Please don't stop posting.  Everyone messes posts up.  It's a requirement to be allowed to continue in the cage.  I got your message anyway.  I answered it didn't I?  We can all read monkey!

      Did you see the post to you the other night?  It was right after you left.


      I try to pick up where I left off every night but, I must have missed that
      Thanks for responding Bearly.
      Rob:  were you waving your towel this week?

      I saw your post Castaglance asking if I am from Pittsburgh and I am. Sorry I didn't reply. I apologize.

      I don't go into downtown unless I have to... and I don't usually participate in that kind of stuff. LOL

      Frank knew Myron died before I did and sent me an email with his condolences. Are you from the area too?

      I do have a few original Terrible towels around here somewhere.

      Yes, just east... I checked for a travel show and we don't have one scheduled here (pout)
      You know the other job to have here? Weatherman, they never get it right either, lol.
      Nice to know such a smart cookie resides close-by. TY
      [/quote]  Er....did you say someone died before you did and he sent condolences?  Wow.  That is strange.       j/b


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: private eye on March 04, 2008, 04:01:38 PM
      Mighty coincidental.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Observer on March 04, 2008, 04:09:33 PM
      I am with you. The first days of the case it was probably almost broken, and the most truth was probably spoken.

      Didn't Mos re-arrest the boys the day the car was delivered to Patrick? Before filming could begin?

      Mighty coincidental is correct since they arrested them on bogus new major evidence. He gets released then confesses to her going into seizures and having her body dumped in the ocean but then isn't arrested. Also the mentioining of another infiltrater in Nov/Dec with recordings,who was the other Infiltrater in Holland?  ::MonkeyRoll::  Something stinks!~


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Shell on March 04, 2008, 04:11:30 PM
      Buckshot, it's around somewhere. That's the way I remember it. It was a small white pick-up (possibly a Toyota) and the license plate was registered to the ALE and it was the truck assigned to Van Der Straaten. That's a little bit clearer.

      Maybe someone has that info stored.

      that's the way I remember it anyway... and around the same time, someone came forward and said that someone stole a white trash bag from the Hyatt beach area.

      It must have been a special kind of white trash bag for someone to even notice it was missing.

      A witness saw it being grabbed from one of the large trash cans.

      Well that is more understandable. Thanks for explaining.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: private eye on March 04, 2008, 04:19:18 PM
      I am supposed to be working on the house and my wife is monitoring the site so I am having to hit and run:)


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: private eye on March 04, 2008, 04:20:09 PM
      Can you tell who THINKS they wear the pants in the family:)


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Shell on March 04, 2008, 04:20:43 PM
      What was the sum / slant of the Teleruba program ?
      Was it to trash anyone but Joran ? ie Patrick ?
      My gut feeling is that if Mother Theresa were alive and made a comment favoring the family or Natalee, she would have " something"  in her background to disrespect and the answers would lie in Calcutta.

      Kat, that is so true.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: mojo on March 04, 2008, 04:27:24 PM
      What was the sum / slant of the Teleruba program ?
      Was it to trash anyone but Joran ? ie Patrick ?
      My gut feeling is that if Mother Theresa were alive and made a comment favoring the family or Natalee, she would have " something"  in her background to disrespect and the answers would lie in Calcutta.

      poor ole mother teresa was taken to task by christopher hitchens - so that ship has sailed too!!  ::MonkeyCool::

      http://www.slate.com/id/2090083/ (http://www.slate.com/id/2090083/)


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Nut44x4 on March 04, 2008, 04:27:54 PM
      Suriname rejects corruption claims in US drug report
      Published on Tuesday, March 4, 2008
      http://www.caribbeannetnews.com/news-6430--36-36--.html


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: jackb on March 04, 2008, 04:29:37 PM
      from Loving Natalee...pg 149

      the meeting in the sloots house with grata and Beth

      Now it's my turn. I have no intentions of a matching her good-boy remarks with good-girl comments. And cut to the chase. Graphically repeating the very words said by their son a couple of weeks ago in his statements made on June 9, 10 and 13.  The vile account that was read to me in the attorney gemeral's office. the sexually explicit words used by Joran to describe what he did to Natale. Calmer than I have ever been in my whole life and without blinking, I tell them which fingers he said he used.  Where he said he put them. How their son described my daughtes' public area, her underwear.  How Joran said she was falling asleep and waking up, falling asleep and waking up. I tell them of his conflicting stories of what happened, the different places he said it happened. Little beads of sweat form across Paulus' brow and forehead.


      I am so getting into full blown heartburn again.Everytime I get angry this is what happens.I think I'll go figure out what's on the menu tonight for dinner after I reach for the Pepcid and do some praying.See ya'll in awhile..Monkey Hugs...



      The underpants thing makes me sick too.

      Hang in there, when I get mad or angry I think of something silly just to release the steam.
      Here is a silly example~
      Joran's new name is Poopsie Picklesniffer~

      http://apps.scholastic.com/captainunderpants/NameGame/play.htm




      It really works.  I was sitting here thinking what I would like to do to that father and son, getting boiling mad all over again, and here comes the words Poopsie Picklesniffer.  I am getting leveled out.  LOL  Poopsie is crazy enough, but pickelsniffer just makes it ring.   LOL.  Jack the cracked. 


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Kat_Gram on March 04, 2008, 04:35:27 PM
      Well, it would not surprise me if Patrick went to Prison.
      IMO His chances of such are increased relative to the amount of time he spends in Aruba. I am a cynic.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: ala_gunslinger on March 04, 2008, 04:37:56 PM
      I am supposed to be working on the house and my wife is monitoring the site so I am having to hit and run:)

      LOL! 

      Been there, do that!


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: jackb on March 04, 2008, 04:45:23 PM
      I adhere to the theory that Natalee Holloway was placed in the landfill.

      The account of Junior ... the landfill witness ... is consistent and …. with much detail was conveyed by his brother to the ALE in the first week of the investigation.  Almost two month later the same story was related to Natalee's family.  Junior provided a description of the vehicle and … he recorded a licence (tag) number. Junior identifies the location where he observed Natalee was placed and .. he described the child’s plastic pool which was used as a covering and ... the plastic pool was recovered in that location by TES/Dave Holloway almost two months later.
       
      I comprehend that Junior failed the polygraph test administered by Jamie Skeeter. However … it should be noted that Junior had volunteered to take that test and … it is known that those who are afflicted with mental disorders/addictions are often very poor candidates for lie detector tests. Also … if Junior feared intimidation by the “powers that be” in Aruba … again the outcome of the polygraph would be considered inconclusive when the stress factor is considered.
       
      I believe it is possible that Natalee was moved from the landfill following Junior's observation.
       
      Junior's brother came forward to authorities on June 3, 2005 … two days after Junior's observation at the landfill on June 1, 2005.  When Junior came forward to Beth Twitty two months later with the same story .... ALE claimed that authorities had gone to the landfill and checked out Junior's original story and .... found nothing. I contend that .... knowing the exact location and .... after only two days had passed since the observation ... the "powers that be" would have had no difficulty locating Natalee.. I suspect that on June 3, 2005 … Natalee could have been moved as a result of Junior's observation.

      I find it highly suspicious that Junior's brother came forward to authorities on June 3, 2005 regarding the happening which Junior had observed at the landfill on June 1, 2005 and ..... the Holloway and Twitty's did not find out about this witness until Junior personally contacted them two months later.
       
      Inquiring minds want to know ... WHY?

      Janet


      +++++++++++

      Edwin Comenencia
      Associated Press
      August 1, 2005


      Police spokesman Edwin Comenencia said police searched the landfill after receiving the tip days after Holloway's disappearance May 30th, but found nothing.
      http://www.wtvynews4.com/home/headlines/1756907.html

        Correct me if I am wront, but the tag number turned out to be a police tag number.  A public official tag number or some thing of the nature.  Those POS(s) better be praying and thanking God they have remained alive.     jack blue


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: JE on March 04, 2008, 04:47:43 PM
      from Loving Natalee...pg 149

      the meeting in the sloots house with grata and Beth

      Now it's my turn. I have no intentions of a matching her good-boy remarks with good-girl comments. And cut to the chase. Graphically repeating the very words said by their son a couple of weeks ago in his statements made on June 9, 10 and 13.  The vile account that was read to me in the attorney gemeral's office. the sexually explicit words used by Joran to describe what he did to Natale. Calmer than I have ever been in my whole life and without blinking, I tell them which fingers he said he used.  Where he said he put them. How their son described my daughtes' public area, her underwear.  How Joran said she was falling asleep and waking up, falling asleep and waking up. I tell them of his conflicting stories of what happened, the different places he said it happened. Little beads of sweat form across Paulus' brow and forehead.


      I am so getting into full blown heartburn again.Everytime I get angry this is what happens.I think I'll go figure out what's on the menu tonight for dinner after I reach for the Pepcid and do some praying.See ya'll in awhile..Monkey Hugs...



      The underpants thing makes me sick too.

      Hang in there, when I get mad or angry I think of something silly just to release the steam.
      Here is a silly example~
      Joran's new name is Poopsie Picklesniffer~

      http://apps.scholastic.com/captainunderpants/NameGame/play.htm




      It really works.  I was sitting here thinking what I would like to do to that father and son, getting boiling mad all over again, and here comes the words Poopsie Picklesniffer.  I am getting leveled out.  LOL  Poopsie is crazy enough, but pickelsniffer just makes it ring.   LOL.  Jack the cracked. 

      according to cptnunderpants site: Freddy Arambatzis= Greasy Diaperfanny  ::MonkeyLaugh::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: ciskebab on March 04, 2008, 04:51:54 PM
      Beth is talking about the seizure qeustion within 48 hours  ::MonkeyDance::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Peaches on March 04, 2008, 04:55:48 PM
      Hi Monkeys~
      I have a question about the prisons in Aruba and Curacao. I seem to recall a prison you tube video of a rap song done in the Curacao prison. I tried to find the video, no luck. In researching it, there was something about removing the lap tops from the prisoners?
      My question is..Are the prisons in the Netherland Antilles different from the USA?

      A little off topic but this was e-mailed to me today~
      Sheriff Joe Arpaio (In Arizona) who created the 'Tent City Jail':

       

      He has jail meals down to 40 cents a serving and charges the inmates for them.
      He stopped smoking and porno magazines in the jails.
      Took away their weights Cut off all but 'G' movies.
      He started chain gangs so the inmates could do free work on county and city projects.
      Then He Started Chain Gangs For Women So He
      Wouldn't Get Sued For Discrimination.
      He took away cable TV Until he found out there was a Federal Court Order that Required Cable TV For Jails so He Hooked Up The Cable TV Again Only Let In the Disney Channel And The Weather Channel. When asked why the weather channel He Replied, so They Will Know How Hot Its Gonna Be While they Are Working ON My Chain Gangs.
      He Cut Off Coffee Since It Has Zero Nutritional Value as well.  ::MonkeyTongue::

      He's a great guy.  He seems to have common sense concerning what prison is and what it's for.  Took a lotta balls to do what he did.  I don't think AZ residents are griping about it...unless they're in his jail.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Observer on March 04, 2008, 04:56:10 PM
      Beth is talking about the seizure qeustion within 48 hours  ::MonkeyDance::

      Good! I hope they ask her more about those first few weeks!


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: JE on March 04, 2008, 04:56:46 PM
      For those who wanna watch the Jenssen show with Beth they ll probably add it here by tomorrow

      http://www.rtl.nl/shows/jensen/home/index.xml


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: ciskebab on March 04, 2008, 04:58:29 PM
      Tomorrow there is another jensen show with peter patrick beth and bram (beth's lawyer) and i saw a clip of it they are going to call joran on his cell lol and he did pick up


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Observer on March 04, 2008, 04:58:47 PM

        Correct me if I am wront, but the tag number turned out to be a police tag number.  A public official tag number or some thing of the nature.  Those POS(s) better be praying and thanking God they have remained alive.     jack blue

      I remember they traced the tag number and said that vehicle could not have been at the Landfill on that day.  ::MonkeyRoll:: I think first they said it was a Maverick or something and then said it was a Govt vehicle.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Observer on March 04, 2008, 04:59:37 PM
      Tomorrow there is another jensen show with peter patrick beth and bram (beth's lawyer) and i saw a clip of it they are going to call joran on his cell lol and he did pick up
      WOW! Thanks for the updates!


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: jackb on March 04, 2008, 05:01:47 PM
      How do you reconcile the first few days of the case, with Anita having such accurate knowledge of Natalee's panties and pubic area, with his confession to Patrick?

      Anita knows what went down that night.
      She probably saw the panties. I have always felt like Natalee was on the Sloot property at some point that evening.
        I am not convinced that Anita was not there the whole time.  She may have been right in the middle of the violence.  Why would Joran protect Palus that much.  He probably would come nearer calling his mama.  Perve Palus was probably caught in the act by Anita and she went bananas too.      jack b



      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: ciskebab on March 04, 2008, 05:05:18 PM
      We get the latest updates from peter and bram tommorow i wonder if something interesting will come up


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: klaasend on March 04, 2008, 05:07:33 PM
      Tomorrow there is another jensen show with peter patrick beth and bram (beth's lawyer) and i saw a clip of it they are going to call joran on his cell lol and he did pick up
      WOW! Thanks for the updates!

       ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyEek::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: klaasend on March 04, 2008, 05:09:51 PM
      Posted by Lazlo at RU:   ::MonkeyHaHa::

      Patrick, de Vries, Beth, Bram and Joran tomorrow on Jensen.
       
      Joran not in the studio but by phone

      Joran is not going to be a guest, Jensen is going to call him, in the preview he was having him on the phone. Not sure if there will be a (long) conversation with him, if any.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: jackb on March 04, 2008, 05:13:26 PM

        Correct me if I am wront, but the tag number turned out to be a police tag number.  A public official tag number or some thing of the nature.  Those POS(s) better be praying and thanking God they have remained alive.     jack blue

      I remember they traced the tag number and said that vehicle could not have been at the Landfill on that day.  ::MonkeyRoll:: I think first they said it was a Maverick or something and then said it was a Govt vehicle.
        It couldof, wouldof and didof as far as I believe.  That gov. official includes the ALE Vanderstratten.  If the had a bloody towell in his car, his car needs to be gone over.  He is a police perv.  There is no telling if he even took NH to the police station and hid her.  I dislike him as much as I do Palus.  That POS is the nearest nothing human being I can imagine besides the sons of ditches who are involved in this.  Anymore instead of saying SH**, I say sloot.  They are that green stuff on slime.        Jack


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: ciskebab on March 04, 2008, 05:14:34 PM
      I wonder if he talked to jensen he problably diddn't know that he was on the show at that moment(i hope) and jensen problaby said to the audience to be very quiet.

      Beth said that if Urine is within here armreach she will problably kill him  ::MonkeyLaugh::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: katrien on March 04, 2008, 05:15:49 PM
      Jensen is fantastic. ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

      Tomorrow as your already know: Beth, Patrick, PeterR and my favourite lawyer: Bram Moszkowicz ::MonkeyCool::

      I consider Moszko as one of the best Dutch lawyers.

      I hope someone will put the show on you tube.

      Tomorrow they are going to phone Joran. ::MonkeyShocked::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: caesu on March 04, 2008, 05:20:34 PM
      Tomorrow there is another jensen show with peter patrick beth and bram (beth's lawyer) and i saw a clip of it they are going to call joran on his cell lol and he did pick up

      so it is true after all that bram mosko is beth's lawyer doing the civil claim.
      very good. i'll watch it afterwards.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: klaasend on March 04, 2008, 05:22:14 PM
      Jensen is fantastic. ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

      Tomorrow as your already know: Beth, Patrick, PeterR and my favourite lawyer: Bram Moszkowicz ::MonkeyCool::

      I consider Moszko as one of the best Dutch lawyers.

      I hope someone will put the show on you tube.

      Tomorrow they are going to phone Joran. ::MonkeyShocked::


      Oh, I'm sure it will be on Youtube


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Bladerunner on March 04, 2008, 05:22:39 PM
      Jensen is fantastic. ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

      Tomorrow as your already know: Beth, Patrick, PeterR and my favourite lawyer: Bram Moszkowicz ::MonkeyCool::

      I consider Moszko as one of the best Dutch lawyers.

      I hope someone will put the show on you tube.

      Tomorrow they are going to phone Joran. ::MonkeyShocked::


      I would think Tacopecker would be smart enough to take all his phones away from him.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Peaches on March 04, 2008, 05:22:54 PM
      According to me, "that green stuff on slime" is Mos.

      See, I know Jack. ::MonkeyCool::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: klaasend on March 04, 2008, 05:24:31 PM
      Posted by Heli at RU:   ::MonkeyHaHa::

      Quote
      GMAFB - hasn't Joran learned yet to keep his pie hole SHUT !!!!!!

      Is he determined to screw himself completely in the eyes of the public?
      If I was his mother, I'd be reading him the riot act; adult or no adult
      he'd be making some hard choices because his sorry ass is in no position
      to get himself through this without the help of his parents and his family.
      Is he not thinking about what this is doing to his younger brothers?



      Quote
      Bram????

      WTF, John Kelly told Greta, absolutely there was no truth to the rumours
      that Bram was going to be pursuing a suit against Joran on Beth's
      behalf for emotional distress.

       These people give me GERD


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: JE on March 04, 2008, 05:26:25 PM
      Jensen is fantastic. ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

      Tomorrow as your already know: Beth, Patrick, PeterR and my favourite lawyer: Bram Moszkowicz ::MonkeyCool::

      I consider Moszko as one of the best Dutch lawyers.

      I hope someone will put the show on you tube.

      Tomorrow they are going to phone Joran. ::MonkeyShocked::


      you can watch it here tomorrow

      http://www.rtl.nl/shows/jensen/home/index.xml

      Oh, I'm sure it will be on Youtube


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Observer on March 04, 2008, 05:27:35 PM
      I wonder if he talked to jensen he problably diddn't know that he was on the show at that moment(i hope) and jensen problaby said to the audience to be very quiet.

      Beth said that if Urine is within here armreach she will problably kill him  ::MonkeyLaugh::

       ::MonkeyEek:: Sounds like some very exciting TV for the Dutch viewers.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: caesu on March 04, 2008, 05:28:55 PM
      i hated jensen before but i might change my mind on him.

      i only watched yesterday with peter r., i thought it was quite good.
      those pauw/witteman and de wereld draait door guy on the other channel are such vinegar pissers. jealous of peter's succes.

      didn't watch today with beth yet.
      calling joran is a good one. not that any of his lies make any sense.

      but it will get press coverage and then the attention can go to the seizures / cover-up and the rest.
      three nights in a row on jensen about the case.
      must be something substantial tomorrow else they wouldn't do that i guess.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Bladerunner on March 04, 2008, 05:29:03 PM
      Posted by Heli at RU:   ::MonkeyHaHa::

      Quote
      GMAFB - hasn't Joran learned yet to keep his pie hole SHUT !!!!!!

      Is he determined to screw himself completely in the eyes of the public?
      If I was his mother, I'd be reading him the riot act; adult or no adult
      he'd be making some hard choices because his sorry ass is in no position
      to get himself through this without the help of his parents and his family.
      Is he not thinking about what this is doing to his younger brothers?



      Quote
      Bram????

      WTF, John Kelly told Greta, absolutely there was no truth to the rumours
      that Bram was going to be pursuing a suit against Joran on Beth's
      behalf for emotional distress.

       These people give me GERD

      What's funny is the use of the word "completely", which is intended to imply that Joran is somehow jeopardizing the goodwill he has with the people by talking on the phone. 

      WAFJ

       ::MonkeyHaHa::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Finbar on March 04, 2008, 05:29:54 PM
      I adhere to the theory that Natalee Holloway was placed in the landfill.

      The account of Junior ... the landfill witness ... is consistent and …. with much detail was conveyed by his brother to the ALE in the first week of the investigation.  Almost two month later the same story was related to Natalee's family.  Junior provided a description of the vehicle and … he recorded a licence (tag) number. Junior identifies the location where he observed Natalee was placed and .. he described the child’s plastic pool which was used as a covering and ... the plastic pool was recovered in that location by TES/Dave Holloway almost two months later.
       
      I comprehend that Junior failed the polygraph test administered by Jamie Skeeter. However … it should be noted that Junior had volunteered to take that test and … it is known that those who are afflicted with mental disorders/addictions are often very poor candidates for lie detector tests. Also … if Junior feared intimidation by the “powers that be” in Aruba … again the outcome of the polygraph would be considered inconclusive when the stress factor is considered.
       
      I believe it is possible that Natalee was moved from the landfill following Junior's observation.
       
      Junior's brother came forward to authorities on June 3, 2005 … two days after Junior's observation at the landfill on June 1, 2005.  When Junior came forward to Beth Twitty two months later with the same story .... ALE claimed that authorities had gone to the landfill and checked out Junior's original story and .... found nothing. I contend that .... knowing the exact location and .... after only two days had passed since the observation ... the "powers that be" would have had no difficulty locating Natalee.. I suspect that on June 3, 2005 … Natalee could have been moved as a result of Junior's observation.
       Or two days to tell those who did know that they need to move the body - fast.
      I find it highly suspicious that Junior's brother came forward to authorities on June 3, 2005 regarding the happening which Junior had observed at the landfill on June 1, 2005 and ..... the Holloway and Twitty's did not find out about this witness until Junior personally contacted them two months later.
       
      Inquiring minds want to know ... WHY?

      Janet


      +++++++++++

      Edwin Comenencia
      Associated Press
      August 1, 2005


      Police spokesman Edwin Comenencia said police searched the landfill after receiving the tip days after Holloway's disappearance May 30th, but found nothing.
      http://www.wtvynews4.com/home/headlines/1756907.html



      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Kermit on March 04, 2008, 05:30:25 PM
      Buckshot, it's around somewhere. That's the way I remember it. It was a small white pick-up (possibly a Toyota) and the license plate was registered to the ALE and it was the truck assigned to Van Der Straaten. That's a little bit clearer.

      Maybe someone has that info stored.

      that's the way I remember it anyway... and around the same time, someone came forward and said that someone stole a white trash bag from the Hyatt beach area.

      MANSUR: Yes, ma`am, because there`s another witness that, before that, told someone that works at the hotels that he saw a white pick-up over there by the Holiday Inn, in which three persons were also in, all of them male, carrying what looked like the body of a girl, putting it in the back of the white pick-up and driving away with it.
      http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0507/29/ng.01.html
      ________________________________________________________


      JUNIOR - the landfill witness

      The witness, an Aruban man who claimed to be dropping off trash at the time of the incident, has been questioned by the FBI and Aruban police, Miller said. "He said he saw a face, blond hair and a woman's chest, and that the body was dumped and covered," Miller said. "His story has been consistent."
      The witness could not identify the men but said they were driving a LIGHT-COLORED JEEP, Miller said.
      http://tinyurl.com/2acpu8
      _________________________________


      BLOODY TOWELS & CARD KEY:


      Two bloody towels and a key card. Don't know who they belong to.
      Thats the "word".

      Are those being tested? What about the rumored condo that JVDS supposedly has access to in the racquet club area?
      http://www.nataleeholloway.net/forum_posts.asp?TID=1482&PN=1&get=last



      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: katrien on March 04, 2008, 05:31:34 PM
      Jensen told he had Joran in his show a while ago.
       
      Today he showed parts from what Joran said when he was in the Jensen show, and compared it with parts from the car interview.  ::MonkeyCool::

      He showed parts when Joran was telling about the shoes and about what happened on the beach.

      Tomorrow at 17.45 (Dutch time) at RTL 5 the same show is repeated.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: ala_gunslinger on March 04, 2008, 05:35:52 PM
      Posted by Heli at RU:   ::MonkeyHaHa::

      Quote
      GMAFB - hasn't Joran learned yet to keep his pie hole SHUT !!!!!!

      Is he determined to screw himself completely in the eyes of the public?
      If I was his mother, I'd be reading him the riot act; adult or no adult
      he'd be making some hard choices because his sorry ass is in no position
      to get himself through this without the help of his parents and his family.
      Is he not thinking about what this is doing to his younger brothers?



      Quote
      Bram????

      WTF, John Kelly told Greta, absolutely there was no truth to the rumours
      that Bram was going to be pursuing a suit against Joran on Beth's
      behalf for emotional distress.

       These people give me GERD

      Dayum!  What planet are they living on!!!????

      He is already FUBAR!  His parents got him where he is today!!!!!

      back to calm!


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: klaasend on March 04, 2008, 05:38:49 PM
      This is pretty funny, Heli didn't know Beth was in the NL right now  ::MonkeyHaHa::

      (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/Lazlo030408.jpg)


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Tamikosmom on March 04, 2008, 05:40:09 PM
      THE LANDFILL WITNESS

      Junior - The Landfill Witness
      On the Record w/ Greta
      August 4, 2005

       
      GRETA VAN VAN SUSTEREN: What did you see?

      JUNIOR: There were three who came before in a pickup truck. Then one was already there on the field. Then this other man and a woman along with two gentlemen in the back came. Yes, there was a woman--a woman who was brunette. There were two men in the back on the Jeep; also, there was a yellow car there.
       
      VAN SUSTEREN: What time of day?
       
      JUNIOR: This happened, well, at the time I saw them bury her it turns out that was the body of Natalee, the girl. At that time I thought it was just a tree--a coconut tree. That is what I thought. She was wrapped in plastic--covered in plastic--but there was a breeze and the bag sort of fell half way off and I saw half the body naked. It was a black plastic bag, and the woman was wearing no clothes. She had no clothes on. She was naked, just half her body I saw. I was by myself at that time at the place where we dump the garbage. How far? I was approximately seventy-five to eighty meters away. This was afternoon--4:30, 5:30--between 4:30 and 5:30. I, I felt there was something wrong, but more people kept coming from nearby. There was another car with a woman. The yellow car had a woman there, too, so, I thought there was nothing… Total, there were three cars; the pickup with the small trailer in the back, then there was a Jeep, and a yellow station wagon.
       
      VAN SUSTEREN: When did he first call anybody about it?
       
      JUNIOR: I called the Police, …that was… that happened on Monday or Sunday because at that time the picture of the guys they were looking for had not been published in the paper yet. That is right. And then I recognized them immediately when I saw the picture. I felt--one day later I called the Police. I was saying, you know, you just want to call, and call, and call, and call--day and night--I kept calling but I kept getting a tape.
       
      VAN SUSTEREN: What is his level of certainty?
       
      JUNIOR: Am I certain?  Yes, I am really sure.  That is why I think, today, “I’m sure, I’m sure. I have no doubt in my mind.” Yes. Also the father, I believe, yes, yes. Also him. I was even more sure it was this girl because now there were two cars. The Police have two cars--the red Jeep, which… I saw that. I saw that because the red Jeep was fine, but that came later, that was the next day. I was near the place where she was buried--may she rest in peace. I was there, maybe, nine days later.
      VAN SUSTEREN: If there were three, does the father make four, or, is the father one of the three?
       
      JUNIOR: The father came in the Jeep. He got out of the car. He was standing there and he was pointing and asking things. I was working, you know, but he was far and he was talking. I was just working and looking. He kept asking if everything was okay. Yes, they asked him. I thought that they were asking him, that is what I thought they were doing, asking him, “Where? Where?”
      VAN SUSTEREN: Have the Police interviewed him [JUNIOR; my insertion] yet?
       
      JUNIOR: The Police they have come to me and I pointed them to the place and they went for my message but never got it. They did not come back. This was in my mind and kept bothering me. I said this all to a friend of mine who lives nearby. I told her what happened and I said, "No one believes me."
       
      VAN SUSTEREN: What, exactly, did he see of the body?
      JUNIOR: Half body. I saw half the body and the hair flying in the wind--blowing in the wind. Then I was for sure because had it have been a coconut tree, then we would have seen the roots of it. You could see that, you know, it would move, but her hair was blowing. I saw half her body and it was naked. She was like this (demonstrating posture), with her legs like this.
       
      http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2596.msg348591;topicseen#msg348591


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: katrien on March 04, 2008, 05:46:01 PM
      i hated jensen before but i might change my mind on him.

      i only watched yesterday with peter r., i thought it was quite good.
      those pauw/witteman and de wereld draait door guy on the other channel are such vinegar pissers. jealous of peter's succes.

      didn't watch today with beth yet.
      calling joran is a good one. not that any of his lies make any sense.

      but it will get press coverage and then the attention can go to the seizures / cover-up and the rest.
      three nights in a row on jensen about the case.
      must be something substantial tomorrow else they wouldn't do that i guess.

      Jensen was on the radio years ago. I wanted to know who he was because he was so funny.  ::MonkeyHaHa::
      Later he started making TV-shows and in the last years he sometimes was very rude. He can make a complete fool of people sometimes.
      But yes, I like him.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Kat_Gram on March 04, 2008, 05:46:30 PM
      I like the Jensen show. More attention in the NL is good. Peter, Robert Jensen,
      Patrick, Beth. Should be good.   


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: martini on March 04, 2008, 05:47:26 PM
      Deepak Sharma Kalpoe = Gidget Pottytush

      Satish Shanaa Kalpoe = Snotty Pottytush

      Paulus Antonius Petrus Johanna van der SLOOT  = Doofus Picklesniffer

      Geoffry van Cromvoirt = Fluffy Picklesniffer

      Guido Wever = Fluffy Chucklebuns

      Seferino “Steve”  Gregory Croes = Snotty Gigglefanny

      Anita Hugen van der Sloot = Stinky Picklesniffer

      note; mods I promise this is my last post on this silliness~ ::MonkeyLaugh::

      http://apps.scholastic.com/captainunderpants/NameGame/play.htm


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Tamikosmom on March 04, 2008, 05:47:58 PM
      Junior described a child's plastic pool which had been used to cover Natalee's body.  Two months later ... the search in the the landfill by Dave Holloway and TEA reveal a child's plastic pool in the area which Junior claims that Natalee had been placed.

      Janet

      ++++++++++

      Jossy Mansur
      NANCY GRACE
      August 3, 2005


      GRACE: And Jossy, have you heard any information regarding a search for one of those little kiddie pools?

      MANSUR: They have been searching for that. They have found one, and they`re concentrating on that area where this witness says that when they dumped the body, they covered it with some other bags and then put this little pool on it.

      GRACE: OK, I`m sorry. I didn`t hear that. Repeat, Jossy.
       
      MANSUR: They are searching where -- they did find this -- one of these pools, this pool, and they have been searching in that specific area because we have to remember that this garbage has been moved about quite a bit from that day on by big tractors and front-end loaders and whatever.
       
      http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0508/03/ng.01.html


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Bladerunner on March 04, 2008, 05:51:31 PM
      Junior described a child's plastic pool which had been used to cover Natalee's body.  Two months later ... the search in the the landfill by Dave Holloway and TEA reveal a child's plastic pool in the area which Junior claims that Natalee had been placed.

      Janet

      ++++++++++

      Jossy Mansur
      NANCY GRACE
      August 3, 2005


      GRACE: And Jossy, have you heard any information regarding a search for one of those little kiddie pools?

      MANSUR: They have been searching for that. They have found one, and they`re concentrating on that area where this witness says that when they dumped the body, they covered it with some other bags and then put this little pool on it.

      GRACE: OK, I`m sorry. I didn`t hear that. Repeat, Jossy.
       
      MANSUR: They are searching where -- they did find this -- one of these pools, this pool, and they have been searching in that specific area because we have to remember that this garbage has been moved about quite a bit from that day on by big tractors and front-end loaders and whatever.
       
      http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0508/03/ng.01.html

      The question then becomes what happened to her body when it was removed from the landfill?


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: caesu on March 04, 2008, 05:51:58 PM
      I like the Jensen show. More attention in the NL is good. Peter, Robert Jensen,
      Patrick, Beth. Should be good.   

      and don't forget Bram Mosko.
      he does appearances on RTL Boulevard. very well watched show i believe.
      very good that the dutch media attention is picking up again.
      i hope Beth will make more appearances, maybe pauw/witteman or RTL Boulevard.

      and then the NOVA special about corruption on the antilles/aruba on friday/saturday.
      from different angles attention.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: JE on March 04, 2008, 05:52:04 PM
      THE LANDFILL WITNESS

      Junior - The Landfill Witness
      On the Record w/ Greta
      August 4, 2005

       
      GRETA VAN VAN SUSTEREN: What did you see?

      JUNIOR: There were three who came before in a pickup truck. Then one was already there on the field. Then this other man and a woman along with two gentlemen in the back came. Yes, there was a woman--a woman who was brunette. There were two men in the back on the Jeep; also, there was a yellow car there.
       
      VAN SUSTEREN: What time of day?
       
      JUNIOR: This happened, well, at the time I saw them bury her it turns out that was the body of Natalee, the girl. At that time I thought it was just a tree--a coconut tree. That is what I thought. She was wrapped in plastic--covered in plastic--but there was a breeze and the bag sort of fell half way off and I saw half the body naked. It was a black plastic bag, and the woman was wearing no clothes. She had no clothes on. She was naked, just half her body I saw. I was by myself at that time at the place where we dump the garbage. How far? I was approximately seventy-five to eighty meters away. This was afternoon--4:30, 5:30--between 4:30 and 5:30. I, I felt there was something wrong, but more people kept coming from nearby. There was another car with a woman. The yellow car had a woman there, too, so, I thought there was nothing… Total, there were three cars; the pickup with the small trailer in the back, then there was a Jeep, and a yellow station wagon.
       
      VAN SUSTEREN: When did he first call anybody about it?
       
      JUNIOR: I called the Police, …that was… that happened on Monday or Sunday because at that time the picture of the guys they were looking for had not been published in the paper yet. That is right. And then I recognized them immediately when I saw the picture. I felt--one day later I called the Police. I was saying, you know, you just want to call, and call, and call, and call--day and night--I kept calling but I kept getting a tape.
       
      VAN SUSTEREN: What is his level of certainty?
       
      JUNIOR: Am I certain?  Yes, I am really sure.  That is why I think, today, “I’m sure, I’m sure. I have no doubt in my mind.” Yes. Also the father, I believe, yes, yes. Also him. I was even more sure it was this girl because now there were two cars. The Police have two cars--the red Jeep, which… I saw that. I saw that because the red Jeep was fine, but that came later, that was the next day. I was near the place where she was buried--may she rest in peace. I was there, maybe, nine days later.
      VAN SUSTEREN: If there were three, does the father make four, or, is the father one of the three?
       
      JUNIOR: The father came in the Jeep.
      He got out of the car. He was standing there and he was pointing and asking things. I was working, you know, but he was far and he was talking. I was just working and looking. He kept asking if everything was okay. Yes, they asked him. I thought that they were asking him, that is what I thought they were doing, asking him, “Where? Where?”
      VAN SUSTEREN: Have the Police interviewed him [JUNIOR; my insertion] yet?
       
      JUNIOR: The Police they have come to me and I pointed them to the place and they went for my message but never got it. They did not come back. This was in my mind and kept bothering me. I said this all to a friend of mine who lives nearby. I told her what happened and I said, "No one believes me."
       
      VAN SUSTEREN: What, exactly, did he see of the body?
      JUNIOR: Half body. I saw half the body and the hair flying in the wind--blowing in the wind. Then I was for sure because had it have been a coconut tree, then we would have seen the roots of it. You could see that, you know, it would move, but her hair was blowing. I saw half her body and it was naked. She was like this (demonstrating posture), with her legs like this.
       
      http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2596.msg348591;topicseen#msg348591


      House Searched

      Two police officers walked through the Van Der Sloot family's one-story, yellow-beige home, while others guarded the entranceway. A blue sport utility vehicle and a red Jeep were also towed from the property


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Kermit on March 04, 2008, 05:54:52 PM
      Heh Heh
      ribbit Miss Texasmom



      ribbit  ::MonkeyHaHa:: ribbit, Kermit
      I was skeeerd when I posted that last quote stack that you were gonna call me on it and then look what you did....ribbit
       ::MonkeyWink::   ::MonkeyCool::

      I like stacked!
       ::MonkeyDance::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Rob on March 04, 2008, 05:55:24 PM
      Janet, do we know what day Junior is referencing when he says the father came in the red jeep? The reason I ask, is because that jeep was confiscated. It might be easy to see if it's even possible.

      Date of jeep confiscation vs date Junior says he is in the dump with the red jeep.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Kermit on March 04, 2008, 05:57:15 PM
      THE LANDFILL WITNESS

      Junior - The Landfill Witness
      On the Record w/ Greta
      August 4, 2005

       
      GRETA VAN VAN SUSTEREN: What did you see?

      JUNIOR: There were three who came before in a pickup truck. Then one was already there on the field. Then this other man and a woman along with two gentlemen in the back came. Yes, there was a woman--a woman who was brunette. There were two men in the back on the Jeep; also, there was a yellow car there.
       
      VAN SUSTEREN: What time of day?
       
      JUNIOR: This happened, well, at the time I saw them bury her it turns out that was the body of Natalee, the girl. At that time I thought it was just a tree--a coconut tree. That is what I thought. She was wrapped in plastic--covered in plastic--but there was a breeze and the bag sort of fell half way off and I saw half the body naked. It was a black plastic bag, and the woman was wearing no clothes. She had no clothes on. She was naked, just half her body I saw. I was by myself at that time at the place where we dump the garbage. How far? I was approximately seventy-five to eighty meters away. This was afternoon--4:30, 5:30--between 4:30 and 5:30. I, I felt there was something wrong, but more people kept coming from nearby. There was another car with a woman. The yellow car had a woman there, too, so, I thought there was nothing… Total, there were three cars; the pickup with the small trailer in the back, then there was a Jeep, and a yellow station wagon.
       
      VAN SUSTEREN: When did he first call anybody about it?
       
      JUNIOR: I called the Police, …that was… that happened on Monday or Sunday because at that time the picture of the guys they were looking for had not been published in the paper yet. That is right. And then I recognized them immediately when I saw the picture. I felt--one day later I called the Police. I was saying, you know, you just want to call, and call, and call, and call--day and night--I kept calling but I kept getting a tape.
       
      VAN SUSTEREN: What is his level of certainty?
       
      JUNIOR: Am I certain?  Yes, I am really sure.  That is why I think, today, “I’m sure, I’m sure. I have no doubt in my mind.” Yes. Also the father, I believe, yes, yes. Also him. I was even more sure it was this girl because now there were two cars. The Police have two cars--the red Jeep, which… I saw that. I saw that because the red Jeep was fine, but that came later, that was the next day. I was near the place where she was buried--may she rest in peace. I was there, maybe, nine days later.
      VAN SUSTEREN: If there were three, does the father make four, or, is the father one of the three?
       
      JUNIOR: The father came in the Jeep.
      He got out of the car. He was standing there and he was pointing and asking things. I was working, you know, but he was far and he was talking. I was just working and looking. He kept asking if everything was okay. Yes, they asked him. I thought that they were asking him, that is what I thought they were doing, asking him, “Where? Where?”
      VAN SUSTEREN: Have the Police interviewed him [JUNIOR; my insertion] yet?
       
      JUNIOR: The Police they have come to me and I pointed them to the place and they went for my message but never got it. They did not come back. This was in my mind and kept bothering me. I said this all to a friend of mine who lives nearby. I told her what happened and I said, "No one believes me."
       
      VAN SUSTEREN: What, exactly, did he see of the body?
      JUNIOR: Half body. I saw half the body and the hair flying in the wind--blowing in the wind. Then I was for sure because had it have been a coconut tree, then we would have seen the roots of it. You could see that, you know, it would move, but her hair was blowing. I saw half her body and it was naked. She was like this (demonstrating posture), with her legs like this.
       
      http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2596.msg348591;topicseen#msg348591


      House Searched

      Two police officers walked through the Van Der Sloot family's one-story, yellow-beige home, while others guarded the entranceway. A blue sport utility vehicle and a red Jeep were also towed from the property


      but they conveniently did not confiscate the Silver HONDA.



      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Kermit on March 04, 2008, 06:00:38 PM
      Buckshot, it's around somewhere. That's the way I remember it. It was a small white pick-up (possibly a Toyota) and the license plate was registered to the ALE and it was the truck assigned to Van Der Straaten. That's a little bit clearer.

      Maybe someone has that info stored.

      that's the way I remember it anyway... and around the same time, someone came forward and said that someone stole a white trash bag from the Hyatt beach area.

      MANSUR: Yes, ma`am, because there`s another witness that, before that, told someone that works at the hotels that he saw a white pick-up over there by the Holiday Inn, in which three persons were also in, all of them male, carrying what looked like the body of a girl, putting it in the back of the white pick-up and driving away with it.
      http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0507/29/ng.01.html
      ________________________________________________________


      JUNIOR - the landfill witness

      The witness, an Aruban man who claimed to be dropping off trash at the time of the incident, has been questioned by the FBI and Aruban police, Miller said. "He said he saw a face, blond hair and a woman's chest, and that the body was dumped and covered," Miller said. "His story has been consistent."
      The witness could not identify the men but said they were driving a LIGHT-COLORED JEEP, Miller said.
      http://tinyurl.com/2acpu8
      _________________________________


      BLOODY TOWELS & CARD KEY:


      Two bloody towels and a key card. Don't know who they belong to.
      Thats the "word".

      Are those being tested? What about the rumored condo that JVDS supposedly has access to in the racquet club area?
      http://www.nataleeholloway.net/forum_posts.asp?TID=1482&PN=1&get=last



      Rob,

      Jun 15, 2005 - cars were brought into custody, not the silver honda though.



      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: klaasend on March 04, 2008, 06:00:44 PM
      Janet, do we know what day Junior is referencing when he says the father came in the red jeep? The reason I ask, is because that jeep was confiscated. It might be easy to see if it's even possible.

      Date of jeep confiscation vs date Junior says he is in the dump with the red jeep.

      From Natalee's Freebirds - June 3rd, so before the Sloot cars were impounded:
      07. POLICE REPORT CONTAININGTAG (LICENCE) NUMBER OF PICKUP OBSERVED AT THE LANDFILL

      The landfill witness, Junior, came forward to Aruban authorities on June 3, 2005 and claimed to have observed a body being placed in the landfill on June 1, 2005. He also recorded the licence (tag) number of the white pickup vehicle involved. ALE claims that the landfill was searched in the area specified to no avail. Two months later Junior approached Natalee's family with the same story. Are both of Junior's statements and the recorded tag number in the Natalee Holloway case file? Whose white pickup truck was this? Was it the same truck seen near the Holiday Inn


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: JE on March 04, 2008, 06:05:38 PM
      sloots red jeep was impounded i believe june 15th

      http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,159601,00.html


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Rob on March 04, 2008, 06:06:00 PM
      Thanks Kerm and Klaas...

      So it is possible. Could that be the reason they were confiscated and not because the ALE thought they were used on the night in question? Of course. So, it adds another question to the list.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Observer on March 04, 2008, 06:10:36 PM

      Rob,

      Jun 15, 2005 - cars were brought into custody, not the silver honda though.



      Deepak's car was impounded on June 9th it's on video.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: jackb on March 04, 2008, 06:11:50 PM
      According to me, "that green stuff on slime" is Mos.

      See, I know Jack. ::MonkeyCool::

      I am thinking someone may be forcing Mos (Moss, A good one peaches) to talk the talk, but he may be working for the good guys.  Those people are dangerous and would not be above threatening his and his family's life.  That place needs to get the good people (person?) off the island and quarantine it for years.   jack b


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Kat_Gram on March 04, 2008, 06:11:59 PM
      I like the Jensen show. More attention in the NL is good. Peter, Robert Jensen,
      Patrick, Beth. Should be good.   

      and don't forget Bram Mosko.
      he does appearances on RTL Boulevard. very well watched show i believe.
      very good that the dutch media attention is picking up again.
      i hope Beth will make more appearances, maybe pauw/witteman or RTL Boulevard.

      and then the NOVA special about corruption on the antilles/aruba on friday/saturday.
      from different angles attention.
      The lawyer is an added bonus and I hope that he speaks to any legal avenues that Beth might follow. Or comment on the "investigation " in Aruba. I believe Jensen is Canadian or has some connection here.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: jackb on March 04, 2008, 06:14:40 PM
      Posted by Heli at RU:   ::MonkeyHaHa::

      Quote
      GMAFB - hasn't Joran learned yet to keep his pie hole SHUT !!!!!!

      Is he determined to screw himself completely in the eyes of the public?
      If I was his mother, I'd be reading him the riot act; adult or no adult
      he'd be making some hard choices because his sorry ass is in no position
      to get himself through this without the help of his parents and his family.
      Is he not thinking about what this is doing to his younger brothers?



      Quote
      Bram????

      WTF, John Kelly told Greta, absolutely there was no truth to the rumours
      that Bram was going to be pursuing a suit against Joran on Beth's
      behalf for emotional distress.

       These people give me GERD

      Dayum!  What planet are they living on!!!????

      He is already FUBAR!  His parents got him where he is today!!!!!

      back to calm!
      They are GERD.  I am not really sure if that is Gas or whatever, but they have earned the name GERD.     j/b


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: klaasend on March 04, 2008, 06:14:49 PM
      Posted at RU - you can download the audio file of todays Jensen with Beth (the titles of Part 1 & 2 were chosen by Abarth at RU):

      Quote from: Abarth
      Part 1: I only want to kill him, what a sick son of a bitch (http://www.sendspace.com/file/r23zb8)
      Part 2: I was never about justice,  revenge ... (http://www.sendspace.com/file/5514qt)


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Blonde on March 04, 2008, 06:15:19 PM
      Anyone know who Darwin Duberto is? TY

      Who is forcing you to play?
      (http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/The%20pimps/normal_Sasha_s15thB-DayPartyPart202.jpg)
      We can hate both when people turn the judicial system into a game. Simply put, it is not a game! Television and legal pundits sit on both sides and commentate as if it were a spectator sport. Attornies hire professional cheerleaders to sway public opinion in their favor. The tiny island of Aruba is no exception. The players start a bit younger and seek a little different thrill. These are the self called "Pimps" of the island. Identified from left to right back row are Giliam Van Der Straaten, Joran Van Der Sloot, Darwin Duberto?, ???, Deepak Kalpoe, Jaime Carrasquilla, ??? Valentjin Van Der Sloot.
      The Pimps are the sons of the current power side of Aruba's political spectrum. These boys has been lucky in the past. Partly due to the leniency of having fathers in positions to help them out and partly because they were seen by the general public as above suspician.
      Several of the mothers taught at the International School of Aruba (ISA) where the boys attend. ISA is a small private pre-k through high school with approximately 120 students total or 7-8 per grade level. If we really explore the situation, we might find that it is some home schooled children that are recieving grants and international aid to build a new school and for travel to foreign countries etc..


      http://arubansecrets.blogspot.com/2005/07/dont-hate-player-hate-game.html


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Ono on March 04, 2008, 06:16:47 PM
      Janet, I'm not sure it matters what I believe. Just what Dave believes. He believes that Dompigs hands were tied by "higher ups"...

      I do not know if he gave Dave the info he needed or was jerking him around... I just don't know. I'm sorry.



      Just a note here, but I remember a very long time ago [ I have no data- only memory ] Jossy said that regularly & periodically the contents of the Aruban dump is taken to the ocean and disposed of - that since Aruba is such a small island this is the only way to handle the waste buildup.  So, was she ever placed in the dump randomly or was she disposed of privately in the ocean ?


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Tamikosmom on March 04, 2008, 06:17:09 PM
      I do not believe that Natalee is still in the landfill.  Junior's brother came forward to authorities two days after Junior's observation at the landfill on June 1, 2005.  When Junior came forward to Beth Twitty two months later with the same story .... investigators claimed that authorities had gone to the landfill and checked out Junior's orginal story but .... found nothing.

      Keep in mind .... within two days .... knowing the exact location .... the "powers that be" would have had no difficulty locating Natalee. I believe that on June 3, 2005 Natalee was again moved as a result of Junior's observation.

      I find it highly suspicous that Junior's brother came forward to authorities on June 3, 2005 regarding what Junior had observed at the landfill on June 1, 2005 and ..... the Holloway and Twitty's did not find out about this witness until Junior contacted them personally two months later.  Inquiring minds want to know ... WHY?

      Also ... there is the issue of the child's plastic pool that Junior claimed was used to cover Natalee and ... lo and behold ... Tim and TEA locate this pool in the area specified by Junior.

      Janet

      +++++++++++


      Tim Miller
      Associated Press
      July 30, 2005


      The witness claimed he saw the men dumping the body on the afternoon of June 1, said Tim Miller, director of Texas EquuSearch, which is coordinating the landfill search.

      The FBI and Aruban police have questioned the witness, an Aruban man who claimed to be dropping off trash at the time, Miller said.

      "He said he saw a face, blond hair and a woman's chest, and that the body was dumped and covered," Miller said. "His story has been consistent."

      The witness could not identify the men but said they were driving a light colored jeep, Miller said. The witness told his brother what he saw soon afterward, and the brother told police, he said.

      http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/07/31/world/main712950.shtml?source=search_story


      Edwin Comenencia - Police Spokesman
      NBC NEWS
      July 31, 2005


      Police spokesman Edwin Comenencia said police searched the landfill after receiving the tip in days following Holloway’s disappearance, but found nothing. He said the witness recently approached Holloway’s family, who asked for another search.

      http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8745217/


      Gerold Dompig
      48 Hours Mystery
      March 25, 2006


      The Aruban authorities’ new theory is that someone, someone possibly very close to the young suspects, took the time to carefully hide the body, not once but maybe twice, literally re-burying her.

      http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/03/22/48hours/main1430644_page4.shtml


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Observer on March 04, 2008, 06:18:35 PM
      Jossy is also on video saying that the two witnesses describe details about a white pu and other things that match up but its even more credible because they have no connection to each other.

      How many people is that now that talked of a white PU that night or 3 days later? 1.Junior who claims he saw a burial 3 days later at the landfill.2.Francisco who says he helped bury a lady the night NH vanished.3 Barbeshe witness4.Tourist wintness.5.Report of a screaming lady and a white PU

      Listen to the end of this clip (Dave talking about the Landfill witness)

      http://tinyurl.com/2bnqyq


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Ono on March 04, 2008, 06:22:20 PM
      Hi Janet:

      Per my post above - the landfill contents are regualry disposed of in the ocean, so if she had been ever there, she surely would not have been for very long because of their disposal method.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Tamikosmom on March 04, 2008, 06:23:46 PM

      Jossy is also on video saying that the two witnesses describe details about a white pu and other things and its remarkeable because they have no connection to each other.  

      How many people is that now that talked of a white PU that night or 3 days later? 1.Junior who claims he saw a burial 3 days later at the landfill.2.Francisco who says he helped bury a lady the night NH vanished.3 Barbeshe witness4.Tourist wintness.5.Report of a screaming lady and a white PU

      Listen to the end of this clip (Dave talking about the Landfill witness)

      http://tinyurl.com/2bnqyq


      Jossy Mansur
      NANCY GRACE
      July 29, 2005


      GRACE: OK. Jossy, is there any way to tie in a white pick-up to this scenario?

      MANSUR: Yes, ma`am, because there`s another witness that, before that, told someone that works at the hotels that he saw a white pick-up over there by the Holiday Inn, in which three persons were also in, all of them male, carrying what looked like the body of a girl, putting it in the back of the white pick-up and driving away with it.
       
      GRACE: OK. So you`ve got a white pick-up at the Holiday Inn, where Natalee was staying. You`ve got a white pick-up at the landfill. Both eyewitnesses state that there were three individuals, I`m assuming male. But can they give an identification of Joran Van Der Sloot or the Kalpoe brothers?
       
      MANSUR: None of them have given that kind of a description. They haven`t identified the three males. But it`s very important to note that the witness on the beach by the Holiday Inn has absolutely no knowledge of the witness over there to the east side of the island by the landfill or dump. They don't know each other, but still they give the same description of the same white pick-up.
       
      http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0507/29/ng.01.html


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: jackb on March 04, 2008, 06:30:29 PM
      THE LANDFILL WITNESS

      Junior - The Landfill Witness
      On the Record w/ Greta
      August 4, 2005

       
      GRETA VAN VAN SUSTEREN: What did you see?

      JUNIOR: There were three who came before in a pickup truck. Then one was already there on the field. Then this other man and a woman along with two gentlemen in the back came. Yes, there was a woman--a woman who was brunette. There were two men in the back on the Jeep; also, there was a yellow car there.
       
      VAN SUSTEREN: What time of day?
       
      JUNIOR: This happened, well, at the time I saw them bury her it turns out that was the body of Natalee, the girl. At that time I thought it was just a tree--a coconut tree. That is what I thought. She was wrapped in plastic--covered in plastic--but there was a breeze and the bag sort of fell half way off and I saw half the body naked. It was a black plastic bag, and the woman was wearing no clothes. She had no clothes on. She was naked, just half her body I saw. I was by myself at that time at the place where we dump the garbage. How far? I was approximately seventy-five to eighty meters away. This was afternoon--4:30, 5:30--between 4:30 and 5:30. I, I felt there was something wrong, but more people kept coming from nearby. There was another car with a woman. The yellow car had a woman there, too, so, I thought there was nothing… Total, there were three cars; the pickup with the small trailer in the back, then there was a Jeep, and a yellow station wagon.
       
      VAN SUSTEREN: When did he first call anybody about it?
       
      JUNIOR: I called the Police, …that was… that happened on Monday or Sunday because at that time the picture of the guys they were looking for had not been published in the paper yet. That is right. And then I recognized them immediately when I saw the picture. I felt--one day later I called the Police. I was saying, you know, you just want to call, and call, and call, and call--day and night--I kept calling but I kept getting a tape.
       
      VAN SUSTEREN: What is his level of certainty?
       
      JUNIOR: Am I certain?  Yes, I am really sure.  That is why I think, today, “I’m sure, I’m sure. I have no doubt in my mind.” Yes. Also the father, I believe, yes, yes. Also him. I was even more sure it was this girl because now there were two cars. The Police have two cars--the red Jeep, which… I saw that. I saw that because the red Jeep was fine, but that came later, that was the next day. I was near the place where she was buried--may she rest in peace. I was there, maybe, nine days later.
      VAN SUSTEREN: If there were three, does the father make four, or, is the father one of the three?
       
      JUNIOR: The father came in the Jeep. He got out of the car. He was standing there and he was pointing and asking things. I was working, you know, but he was far and he was talking. I was just working and looking. He kept asking if everything was okay. Yes, they asked him. I thought that they were asking him, that is what I thought they were doing, asking him, “Where? Where?”
      VAN SUSTEREN: Have the Police interviewed him [JUNIOR; my insertion] yet?
       
      JUNIOR: The Police they have come to me and I pointed them to the place and they went for my message but never got it. They did not come back. This was in my mind and kept bothering me. I said this all to a friend of mine who lives nearby. I told her what happened and I said, "No one believes me."
       
      VAN SUSTEREN: What, exactly, did he see of the body?
      JUNIOR: Half body. I saw half the body and the hair flying in the wind--blowing in the wind. Then I was for sure because had it have been a coconut tree, then we would have seen the roots of it. You could see that, you know, it would move, but her hair was blowing. I saw half her body and it was naked. She was like this (demonstrating posture), with her legs like this.
       
      http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2596.msg348591;topicseen#msg348591

        It would be good to see how Junior is faring.  Hope they have not offed him.  The thugs need to be exterminated, as they are spreading disease.
              jack b


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: klaasend on March 04, 2008, 06:31:05 PM
      CLICK ON PLAY  ::MonkeyHaHa::


      http://llnw.jibjab.com/content/player.swf?content_url=http://www.jibjab.com/sendables/api/remote/gJV7RXtucHG09M0FjC93b39k.xml


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Destiny on March 04, 2008, 06:31:11 PM
      THE LANDFILL WITNESS

      Junior - The Landfill Witness
      On the Record w/ Greta
      August 4, 2005

       
      GRETA VAN VAN SUSTEREN: What did you see?

      JUNIOR: There were three who came before in a pickup truck. Then one was already there on the field. Then this other man and a woman along with two gentlemen in the back came. Yes, there was a woman--a woman who was brunette. There were two men in the back on the Jeep; also, there was a yellow car there.
       
      VAN SUSTEREN: What time of day?
       
      JUNIOR: This happened, well, at the time I saw them bury her it turns out that was the body of Natalee, the girl. At that time I thought it was just a tree--a coconut tree. That is what I thought. She was wrapped in plastic--covered in plastic--but there was a breeze and the bag sort of fell half way off and I saw half the body naked. It was a black plastic bag, and the woman was wearing no clothes. She had no clothes on. She was naked, just half her body I saw. I was by myself at that time at the place where we dump the garbage. How far? I was approximately seventy-five to eighty meters away. This was afternoon--4:30, 5:30--between 4:30 and 5:30. I, I felt there was something wrong, but more people kept coming from nearby. There was another car with a woman. The yellow car had a woman there, too, so, I thought there was nothing… Total, there were three cars; the pickup with the small trailer in the back, then there was a Jeep, and a yellow station wagon.
       
      VAN SUSTEREN: When did he first call anybody about it?
       
      JUNIOR: I called the Police, …that was… that happened on Monday or Sunday because at that time the picture of the guys they were looking for had not been published in the paper yet. That is right. And then I recognized them immediately when I saw the picture. I felt--one day later I called the Police. I was saying, you know, you just want to call, and call, and call, and call--day and night--I kept calling but I kept getting a tape.
       
      VAN SUSTEREN: What is his level of certainty?
       
      JUNIOR: Am I certain?  Yes, I am really sure.  That is why I think, today, “I’m sure, I’m sure. I have no doubt in my mind.” Yes. Also the father, I believe, yes, yes. Also him. I was even more sure it was this girl because now there were two cars. The Police have two cars--the red Jeep, which… I saw that. I saw that because the red Jeep was fine, but that came later, that was the next day. I was near the place where she was buried--may she rest in peace. I was there, maybe, nine days later.
      VAN SUSTEREN: If there were three, does the father make four, or, is the father one of the three?
       
      JUNIOR: The father came in the Jeep.
      He got out of the car. He was standing there and he was pointing and asking things. I was working, you know, but he was far and he was talking. I was just working and looking. He kept asking if everything was okay. Yes, they asked him. I thought that they were asking him, that is what I thought they were doing, asking him, “Where? Where?”
      VAN SUSTEREN: Have the Police interviewed him [JUNIOR; my insertion] yet?
       
      JUNIOR: The Police they have come to me and I pointed them to the place and they went for my message but never got it. They did not come back. This was in my mind and kept bothering me. I said this all to a friend of mine who lives nearby. I told her what happened and I said, "No one believes me."
       
      VAN SUSTEREN: What, exactly, did he see of the body?
      JUNIOR: Half body. I saw half the body and the hair flying in the wind--blowing in the wind. Then I was for sure because had it have been a coconut tree, then we would have seen the roots of it. You could see that, you know, it would move, but her hair was blowing. I saw half her body and it was naked. She was like this (demonstrating posture), with her legs like this.
       
      http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2596.msg348591;topicseen#msg348591


      House Searched

      Two police officers walked through the Van Der Sloot family's one-story, yellow-beige home, while others guarded the entranceway. A blue sport utility vehicle and a red Jeep were also towed from the property

      And taken directly in for a complete detail job...compliments of the ALE....then, returned nice and clean...gotta get those *chocolate* stains out Ya know...


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Peaches on March 04, 2008, 06:32:32 PM
      Klaas, that's a riot. ::MonkeyLaugh::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: bluwaters on March 04, 2008, 06:34:35 PM
       ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

      Good one Klaas!

      That cheered me up! Thanks for the laugh.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Bearlyhere on March 04, 2008, 06:34:46 PM
      And when Paulus was sweating, shaking, and squirming, was he actually doing anything to defend the boy, Joran, or was he sitting there a spectator? Was he nervous from covering up for the boy or was he guilty as sin and overwhelmed by fear of the consequences of getting caught and the shame of his own actions? Anita doesn't sweat or squirm when she is covering for Joran. She has absolutely no shame or guilt, because she is protecting her son. She is not ashamed of her own actions or worried about her own guilt.

      Paulie the Perve is either is guilty as hell or he gets all worked up thinking about panties.

      Pervie Paulie picked a peck of perfumed panties.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: klaasend on March 04, 2008, 06:37:18 PM
      Blonde - I'm pretty sure this is Darwin

      (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/normal_Sasha_s15thB-DayPartyPart202.jpg)


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Destiny on March 04, 2008, 06:40:13 PM
      CLICK ON PLAY  ::MonkeyHaHa::


      http://llnw.jibjab.com/content/player.swf?content_url=http://www.jibjab.com/sendables/api/remote/gJV7RXtucHG09M0FjC93b39k.xml

      Klaasend....You are an absolute RIOT!!!!


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Tamikosmom on March 04, 2008, 06:41:36 PM
      Hi Janet:

      Per my post above - the landfill contents are regualry disposed of in the ocean, so if she had been ever there, she surely would not have been for very long because of their disposal method.

      The discovery by TEA of the child's pool under tons of garbage in the area that Junior claimed Natalee was placed implies to me that Natalee had been there but ... was taken from the landfill.

      I contend that the original report of June 3, 2005 of Junior's observation on June 1, 2005 dictated that the "powers that be" in the coverup were forced to move Natalee from the landfill and ... it was a wise decision.  Two months later Junior came foreward to the Twittys with the same account of what he had observed on June 1, 2005.

      Janet
       


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: caesu on March 04, 2008, 06:41:43 PM
      wednesday (or thursday?) Bram Mosko at Pauw/Witteman.
      seems like a co-ordinated effort to bring the case to the attention.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Bearlyhere on March 04, 2008, 06:44:48 PM
      http://www.coolaruba.com/component/option,com_gallery2/Itemid,28/?g2_itemId=293547


      photos from the Teleruba Show with Patrick

      Is this another example of how they have spent their money looking for Natalee?  Or did they use all the money for the cover up?


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Destiny on March 04, 2008, 06:47:20 PM
      CLICK ON PLAY  ::MonkeyHaHa::


      http://llnw.jibjab.com/content/player.swf?content_url=http://www.jibjab.com/sendables/api/remote/gJV7RXtucHG09M0FjC93b39k.xml

      Klaasend....You are an absolute RIOT!!!!
      wednesday (or thursday?) Bram Mosko at Pauw/Witteman.
      seems like a co-ordinated effort to bring the case to the attention.

      Great...'bout time!  And, of course, Urine I'm sure is jonesing for an attention *fix*...so hopefully..when he is called...he babbles on and on...

      One thing I've discovered about Urine...He thinks he sh*ts ice cream, and we should all grab a cone, and fight to get in line behind him...

      Should be some interesting shows ;-)


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Tamikosmom on March 04, 2008, 06:48:50 PM
      Junior provided a tag (license) number to Aruban authorities and ... two months later ... he provided the same tag number to the Twittys.

      Who was that tag number registered to?

      Janet

      +++++++++++

      Susan Candiotti - Cnn Correspondent
      NANCY GRACE
      July 29, 2005

       
      CANDIOTTI: Well, according to sources familiar with the investigation, at least one witness has come forward who claims to have seen more than one person dumping what the witness says could have been a body. The body was, I am told, covered in some fashion, and that this happened at a public landfill not long before closing time.  Now, when this happened, sources close to the investigation would not tell me exactly when this happened. But again, it was close to closing time. And this is a landfill where the public can go and dispose of waste. Now, this same witness claims to have told police that he saw a vehicle and was able to provide a tag number to police. I am told that this is a registered car in Aruba, but I can`t tell you more than that.
      http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0507/29/ng.01.html


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: AZSunny on March 04, 2008, 06:51:19 PM
      Jossy is also on video saying that the two witnesses describe details about a white pu and other things that match up but its even more credible because they have no connection to each other.

      How many people is that now that talked of a white PU that night or 3 days later? 1.Junior who claims he saw a burial 3 days later at the landfill.2.Francisco who says he helped bury a lady the night NH vanished.3 Barbeshe witness4.Tourist wintness.5.Report of a screaming lady and a white PU

      Listen to the end of this clip (Dave talking about the Landfill witness)

      http://tinyurl.com/
      2bnqyq

      With all the talk of the white truck, I am trying to search my memory for a white car or truck that was seen by two women that worked at a radio station.  They said it was 'hidden' behind  bushes in the desert, and when they approached someone with a machette appeared and warned them off.  It as at the time that the arubans were searching, the marines, etc. or earlier, perhaps was shortly after Natalee went missing.

      Does anyone know if any of that was true or was it not considered reliable.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Ono on March 04, 2008, 06:55:01 PM
      Hi Janet:

      Per my post above - the landfill contents are regualry disposed of in the ocean, so if she had been ever there, she surely would not have been for very long because of their disposal method.

      The discovery by TEA of the child's pool under tons of garbage in the area that Junior claimed Natalee was placed implies to me that Natalee had been there but ... was taken from the landfill.

      I contend that the original report of June 3, 2005 of Junior's observation on June 1, 2005 dictated that the "powers that be" in the coverup were forced to move Natalee from the landfill and ... it was a wise decision.  Two months later Junior came foreward to the Twittys with the same account of what he had observed on June 1, 2005.

      Janet
       


      Yes, all quite possible....or maybe her clothes/shoes were put in the landfill under the kiddie pool?    Everything seems to have been so professionally done  that placing her body in the landfill seems pretty risky to me.   Maybe so.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: KarmaRoundUp on March 04, 2008, 06:56:24 PM
      If Natalee's remains have been recovered ... somebody need to tell Tim Miller.  As of February 27, 2008 ... Tim's impression was that there were 169 targets which still needed to be searched.

      Janet

      +++++++++++


      Tim Miller
      On the Record w/ Greta
      February 27, 2008


      MILLER: The report we got is the DNA that came back did not match Natalee's DNA and when we located that it looked like more than just a piece of cloth and I mean we, we felt as though we seen a skull in there. We got the Aruba authorities involved, they felt there was something in there, we dove on it and the thing is that's only 1 of over 170 targets out there we still have to investigate, so we've got a lot of work ahead of us.

      Transcript - Heli (RU)

      Maybe we aren't allowed to know just yet.  Maybe they need more confirmation.

      I don't believe they have found Natalee's remains. I see and visit with Beth's Mom at least once a week, usually more, and she could not keep that secret. There are plenty or real mysteries with which to deal. It would be great though. I have a feeling that Beth would be with her Mom if that had happened as well.
      I also don't think they found Natalee's remains but why would they even bother sending those 6 images to the FBI unless something was found?

      I thought they sent them to verify if the findings could be related in anyway to Natalee
      I don't know,would the FBI be able to determine or verify much from just 6 images?


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Bearlyhere on March 04, 2008, 06:58:54 PM
      He spent a lot of time around her pubic area, including really studying her panties to have been on the beach and then to have her start shaking and having seizures, and the moon had to be exceptionally bright.

      I doubt that there was a bright moon. Joran said somewhere that there were no stars maybe it was clouded. Also in one of satishe's PV's they asked him about the light level in the car and about weather conditions.

      from june 30

      On your question of when Deepak, Joran and I were with Natalee on, May 30, 2005, in the nighttime hours, wasn’t it too dark in the car for Joran to see the color of the missing girl’s panties, I can only answer this:
      There was enough light in the car of Deepak. Joran must have taken off the clothing of the girl so that he could see the color of the panties she wore.

      from june 3

      On your question of what it was like on Monday, May 30, 2005, in the nighttime hours, when Deepak and I dropped off Joran and the missing American girl north of the Marriott, I can answer you the following:
      I cannot you say what it was like because I sat in my brother Deepak’s car.  I also didn’t look up to see if there were clouds.

      This is another of those areas of too much information, and as personal as it is, everyone knows it.  must have put it on the news, possible made an emergency broadcasting.  There are too many people who know this and too much detail about it, I'm surprised no one checked the tag for her size.

      Do you mean to tell me, there was a girl in the back seat of the car with no underwear on, and everyone was memorizing her panties, they didn't gawk at her naked body?  You'll never sell me on that.  The underwear is part of a much more sinister story, imo.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Tamikosmom on March 04, 2008, 06:59:03 PM
      Junior provided a tag (license) number to Aruban authorities and ... two months later ... he provided the same tag number to the Twittys.

      Who was that tag number registered to?

      Janet

      +++++++++++

      Susan Candiotti - Cnn Correspondent
      NANCY GRACE
      July 29, 2005

       
      CANDIOTTI: Well, according to sources familiar with the investigation, at least one witness has come forward who claims to have seen more than one person dumping what the witness says could have been a body. The body was, I am told, covered in some fashion, and that this happened at a public landfill not long before closing time.  Now, when this happened, sources close to the investigation would not tell me exactly when this happened. But again, it was close to closing time. And this is a landfill where the public can go and dispose of waste. Now, this same witness claims to have told police that he saw a vehicle and was able to provide a tag number to police. I am told that this is a registered car in Aruba, but I can`t tell you more than that.
      http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0507/29/ng.01.html


      Roy Tromp
      CNN NEWS
      July 30, 2005


      In addition to the pond, Trump said authorities are searching a landfill for the third time since a witness came forward shortly after Holloway disappeared. Trump said that authorities did not want to leave any stone unturned.

      The witness claimed he saw more than one person dump into the landfill something he believes could have been a covered body, CNN has learned from sources briefed on the investigation. The witness also gave police a license tag number that reportedly belonged to a white pickup truck.

      Police tell CNN that a tag check found that the vehicle was not at the landfill at or around the time the witness claimed.

      http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/07/30/aruba.missing/index.html


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Bearlyhere on March 04, 2008, 07:04:17 PM
      I am with you. The first days of the case it was probably almost broken, and the most truth was probably spoken.

      Didn't Mos re-arrest the boys the day the car was delivered to Patrick? Before filming could begin?

      Mighty coincidental is correct since they arrested them on bogus new major evidence. He gets released then confesses to her going into seizures and having her body dumped in the ocean but then isn't arrested. Also the mentioining of another infiltrater in Nov/Dec with recordings,who was the other Infiltrater in Holland?  ::MonkeyRoll::  Something stinks!~

      I always thought they were talking about Patrick.  Didn't Patrick go to ALE and offer to go under cover for them first and when they could not do it, he offered himself to Patrick?


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: klaasend on March 04, 2008, 07:12:26 PM
      Jossy is also on video saying that the two witnesses describe details about a white pu and other things that match up but its even more credible because they have no connection to each other.

      How many people is that now that talked of a white PU that night or 3 days later? 1.Junior who claims he saw a burial 3 days later at the landfill.2.Francisco who says he helped bury a lady the night NH vanished.3 Barbeshe witness4.Tourist wintness.5.Report of a screaming lady and a white PU

      Listen to the end of this clip (Dave talking about the Landfill witness)

      http://tinyurl.com/
      2bnqyq

      With all the talk of the white truck, I am trying to search my memory for a white car or truck that was seen by two women that worked at a radio station.  They said it was 'hidden' behind  bushes in the desert, and when they approached someone with a machette appeared and warned them off.  It as at the time that the arubans were searching, the marines, etc. or earlier, perhaps was shortly after Natalee went missing.

      Does anyone know if any of that was true or was it not considered reliable.

      The following post was made by Red (not our RED) in the Prophecies forum:

      A local young person was the one who tipped regarding the body in the landfill. This person saw that on 2 days after Natalee was reported missing he saw some guys take out a large garbage with a stiff body.

      As they took the body out, the wind blew the bag open and in it he
      saw that a body was laying stiff on a blue beach bed and the legs were crossed on to the other and he saw long blond hair.

      This car was a light coloured truck, he took the number plate and reported this to the authorities. They found out that this car belonged to a POLICE auth. He was driving around with a towel with the blood on it,
      but they never cared for his story!!.


      He said that yesterday US media went to his house, but he refused to give any reports. He said tomorrow he will give an interv. with Canal 90
      local radio, afterwards to US media..
      will keep U posted.
      red.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Bearlyhere on March 04, 2008, 07:14:48 PM
      i hated jensen before but i might change my mind on him.

      i only watched yesterday with peter r., i thought it was quite good.
      those pauw/witteman and de wereld draait door guy on the other channel are such vinegar pissers. jealous of peter's succes.

      didn't watch today with beth yet.
      calling joran is a good one. not that any of his lies make any sense.

      but it will get press coverage and then the attention can go to the seizures / cover-up and the rest.
      three nights in a row on jensen about the case.
      must be something substantial tomorrow else they wouldn't do that i guess.

      I wonder how he answers the phone?

      Pimp headquarters, Gabby speaking...


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: KarmaRoundUp on March 04, 2008, 07:20:00 PM
      There is an article in Bon Dia today about Air Force 2. It's on page 3 of the i-paper. Can't understand any of it. LOL!

      http://www.bondia.com/index.php?option=com_flippingbook&book_id=2

      There is also something about New York and tourism and a image of Myrna Jannsen(sp)on page #6.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Blue Moon on March 04, 2008, 07:20:44 PM
      CLICK ON PLAY  ::MonkeyHaHa::


      http://llnw.jibjab.com/content/player.swf?content_url=http://www.jibjab.com/sendables/api/remote/gJV7RXtucHG09M0FjC93b39k.xml

      Priceless-Your best yet.  But Happy St Patty's day NOT. ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Shell on March 04, 2008, 07:26:44 PM
      And when Paulus was sweating, shaking, and squirming, was he actually doing anything to defend the boy, Joran, or was he sitting there a spectator? Was he nervous from covering up for the boy or was he guilty as sin and overwhelmed by fear of the consequences of getting caught and the shame of his own actions? Anita doesn't sweat or squirm when she is covering for Joran. She has absolutely no shame or guilt, because she is protecting her son. She is not ashamed of her own actions or worried about her own guilt.

      Paulie the Perve is either is guilty as hell or he gets all worked up thinking about panties.

      Pervie Paulie picked a peck of perfumed panties.

      Between Klaas' latest creation and this comment, I am seriously ROFLLLL


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: JE on March 04, 2008, 07:27:29 PM
      I am with you. The first days of the case it was probably almost broken, and the most truth was probably spoken.

      Didn't Mos re-arrest the boys the day the car was delivered to Patrick? Before filming could begin?

      Mighty coincidental is correct since they arrested them on bogus new major evidence. He gets released then confesses to her going into seizures and having her body dumped in the ocean but then isn't arrested. Also the mentioining of another infiltrater in Nov/Dec with recordings,who was the other Infiltrater in Holland?  ::MonkeyRoll::  Something stinks!~

      I always thought they were talking about Patrick.  Didn't Patrick go to ALE and offer to go under cover for them first and when they could not do it, he offered himself to Patrick?

      Patrick went to the police in holland but they wouldn't work with him because of some demands he had that the did not agree with. He talked to the police in the eastern part of holland (where he has his company) but they turned it down. They did however tell this to the police in rotterdam because some of their force were involved in the investigation. One thing that stuck with me is that after the PRDV show aired in holland JVDS was on the phone with Pauw&Witteman. He said that he did say all those things to Patrick but that it would be easy to prove that he lied. They asked him to give an example and he said "the phone outside the marriott can only be used to make international calls"  That detail made me wonder if he had a hunch that he was being taped. What i mean is: if he suspected the car was bugged he could have thrown in details that he could disprove. He could also expect a move by the OM to arrest him again. By telling obvious and easy to check lies, Daury comes to mind, the bar for the next arrest would so high that he may be off the hook forever.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: dennisintn on March 04, 2008, 07:29:23 PM
      I am with you. The first days of the case it was probably almost broken, and the most truth was probably spoken.

      Didn't Mos re-arrest the boys the day the car was delivered to Patrick? Before filming could begin?

      Mighty coincidental is correct since they arrested them on bogus new major evidence. He gets released then confesses to her going into seizures and having her body dumped in the ocean but then isn't arrested. Also the mentioining of another infiltrater in Nov/Dec with recordings,who was the other Infiltrater in Holland?  ::MonkeyRoll::  Something stinks!~

      I always thought they were talking about Patrick.  Didn't Patrick go to ALE and offer to go under cover for them first and when they could not do it, he offered himself to Patrick?

      i thought patrick had approached the police in holland.  they refused and didn't even carry it to the prosecutors there.  aruba never knew of patrick.  just guessing, but i think if a.l.e. had heard about it, paulus would have heard about it. 
      dennisintn


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: anidac on March 04, 2008, 07:30:35 PM
      Anything exciting I should scan for when i start with yesterday's thread to catch up to you folks tonight?


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Observer on March 04, 2008, 07:33:01 PM
      I just posted this recently but I want to make sure we have this all in the same place.

      More on white truck....from Fox's At Large Show - Sunday July 31st, 2005

      Jossy states......

      The latest information we have in the investigation is that the police are actively looking for a K-Swiss style shoe - size 14 that belongs to Joran van der Sloot.  Now the police have information that he lost either one or both of his shoes that early morning in which Natalee disappeared. That would be the 30th of May.

      The witness by the landfill tells us that he was sitting in his car and he saw a white pick-up truck drive in, their were 3 occupants and 2 of them got out. Picked up a trash can plastic bag, the black ones, the big ones and they carried it over to where this whole bunch of other bags and rubble was. Now when they were doing that, he says that some blond hair fell out of the bag because the bag was not properly sealed and that he could see parts of human body and then he saw them dig a little among the rubble that was there already and then place this bag there then covered with some other near by lying bags and then put a small pool, plastic pool that babies swim in or bathe in on top of it and then put some more stuff and then walked away.  He also told us that there was another car outside of the cyclone fence, looking on. The man in that car stepped out, he stood by the fence and looked at the whole proceeding's.  We do believe him because from the beginning he has been reliable with his story and it does fit the description we got from another witness between the Holiday Inn and the Marriott Hotel.

      The letter that we received is from the wife of the person with whom this guy was on the beach with between the Holiday Inn and Marriott wrote us because she was getting a annoyed that no one was paying attention to the declaration that this man gave to her husband at the hotel.

      I will read it for you... The day after Natalee was missing a person called Barbeshe (Bar-Be-she) told a story that the night before he saw 3 people in front of the Holiday Inn with a girl's body. That they tried to take a towel from one the "walks fence's" (really hard to understand him here - sounds like he says "water sports dance or fence") to wrap the body and they could not get it down. Then one of them went to the garbage cans at the Holiday Inn and pulled the bags out and wrapped the body, then put her in the white pick-up and left. They went out and turned left towards the lighthouse and turned off on a dirt road and dug a hole and put her in it and threw out the shovel. He also said he told the police and they sent him on a 4 wheeler to try and find, locate the spot and he had been threatened by these people. This person has been seen on the beach everyday has no longer been seen after this and was known to be there daily.

      http://www.riehlworldview.com/carnivorous_conservative/2005/08/fyi.html


      eleye
      Scared Monkey

      Joined: 31 Jul 2005

      PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2005 9:14 am Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote
      "The day after NH was missing, a person called 'Barbishi' told the story that the night before, he saw three people in front of the HI, with the girls body, and that they tried to take a tarp from one of the water-sport tents to wrap the body, and could not get it down.

      Then, that one of them went to the garbage cans at the Hyatt [?] [unclear perhaps' Holiday?], and took the bags out and wrapped the body, put her in a white PU and left. They went out and turned left, towards the light house, and turned off on a dirt road, and dug a hole and put her in it, and threw out the shovel. He also said he told the police, and they send [sic] him on a four wheeler to try and locate the spot.

      And he also said he had been threatened by these people. This person who has been seen on the beach every day, has no longer been seen after this, and he was known to be there daily." [end of letter]


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: bleachedblack on March 04, 2008, 07:43:56 PM
      ******* quoted;

      Quote
      More on white truck....from Fox's At Large Show - Sunday July 31st, 2005

      Jossy states......

      The latest information we have in the investigation is that the police are actively looking for a K-Swiss style shoe - size 14 that belongs to Joran van der Sloot.

      Sorry for being slightly OT, but I find this reference to "a" "single" shoe once again very interesting, and an often cited point of discrepancy. 2 missing shoes would IMO be more likely someone forgot or misplaced them, 1 missing shoe IMO would possibly be someone who dropped/lost perhaps due to rushed activity or carrying to much and being unaware of dropping it. Initially it was reported ALE was looking for 1 sneaker.......then it became 2.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Lala'sMom on March 04, 2008, 07:44:53 PM
      I just posted this recently but I want to make sure we have this all in the same place.

      More on white truck....from Fox's At Large Show - Sunday July 31st, 2005

      Jossy states......

      The latest information we have in the investigation is that the police are actively looking for a K-Swiss style shoe - size 14 that belongs to Joran van der Sloot.  Now the police have information that he lost either one or both of his shoes that early morning in which Natalee disappeared. That would be the 30th of May.

      The witness by the landfill tells us that he was sitting in his car and he saw a white pick-up truck drive in, their were 3 occupants and 2 of them got out. Picked up a trash can plastic bag, the black ones, the big ones and they carried it over to where this whole bunch of other bags and rubble was. Now when they were doing that, he says that some blond hair fell out of the bag because the bag was not properly sealed and that he could see parts of human body and then he saw them dig a little among the rubble that was there already and then place this bag there then covered with some other near by lying bags and then put a small pool, plastic pool that babies swim in or bathe in on top of it and then put some more stuff and then walked away.  He also told us that there was another car outside of the cyclone fence, looking on. The man in that car stepped out, he stood by the fence and looked at the whole proceeding's.  We do believe him because from the beginning he has been reliable with his story and it does fit the description we got from another witness between the Holiday Inn and the Marriott Hotel.

      The letter that we received is from the wife of the person with whom this guy was on the beach with between the Holiday Inn and Marriott wrote us because she was getting a annoyed that no one was paying attention to the declaration that this man gave to her husband at the hotel.

      I will read it for you... The day after Natalee was missing a person called Barbeshe (Bar-Be-she) told a story that the night before he saw 3 people in front of the Holiday Inn with a girl's body. That they tried to take a towel from one the "walks fence's" (really hard to understand him here - sounds like he says "water sports dance or fence") to wrap the body and they could not get it down. Then one of them went to the garbage cans at the Holiday Inn and pulled the bags out and wrapped the body, then put her in the white pick-up and left. They went out and turned left towards the lighthouse and turned off on a dirt road and dug a hole and put her in it and threw out the shovel. He also said he told the police and they sent him on a 4 wheeler to try and find, locate the spot and he had been threatened by these people. This person has been seen on the beach everyday has no longer been seen after this and was known to be there daily.

      http://www.riehlworldview.com/carnivorous_conservative/2005/08/fyi.html


      eleye
      Scared Monkey

      Joined: 31 Jul 2005

      PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2005 9:14 am Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote
      "The day after NH was missing, a person called 'Barbishi' told the story that the night before, he saw three people in front of the HI, with the girls body, and that they tried to take a tarp from one of the water-sport tents to wrap the body, and could not get it down.

      Then, that one of them went to the garbage cans at the Hyatt [?] [unclear perhaps' Holiday?], and took the bags out and wrapped the body, put her in a white PU and left. They went out and turned left, towards the light house, and turned off on a dirt road, and dug a hole and put her in it, and threw out the shovel. He also said he told the police, and they send [sic] him on a four wheeler to try and locate the spot.

      And he also said he had been threatened by these people. This person who has been seen on the beach every day, has no longer been seen after this, and he was known to be there daily." [end of letter]

      Well, we know this wasn't Boeti. Who was it?   In front of the HI?  Who is Barbishi?  Is this Barbishi the missing person on the beach? A body???  And yet no one asks any questions.  :roll: :roll:


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: JE on March 04, 2008, 07:46:12 PM
      I am with you. The first days of the case it was probably almost broken, and the most truth was probably spoken.

      Didn't Mos re-arrest the boys the day the car was delivered to Patrick? Before filming could begin?

      Mighty coincidental is correct since they arrested them on bogus new major evidence. He gets released then confesses to her going into seizures and having her body dumped in the ocean but then isn't arrested. Also the mentioining of another infiltrater in Nov/Dec with recordings,who was the other Infiltrater in Holland?  ::MonkeyRoll::  Something stinks!~

      I always thought they were talking about Patrick.  Didn't Patrick go to ALE and offer to go under cover for them first and when they could not do it, he offered himself to Patrick?

      Patrick went to the police in holland but they wouldn't work with him because of some demands he had that the did not agree with. He talked to the police in the eastern part of holland (where he has his company) but they turned it down. They did however tell this to the police in rotterdam because some of their force were involved in the investigation. One thing that stuck with me is that after the PRDV show aired in holland JVDS was on the phone with Pauw&Witteman. He said that he did say all those things to Patrick but that it would be easy to prove that he lied. They asked him to give an example and he said "the phone outside the marriott can only be used to make international calls"  That detail made me wonder if he had a hunch that he was being taped. What i mean is: if he suspected the car was bugged he could have thrown in details that he could disprove. He could also expect a move by the OM to arrest him again. By telling obvious and easy to check lies, Daury comes to mind, the bar for the next arrest would so high that he may be off the hook forever.

      Also hans mos had the PRDV tapes one week before they aired. assuming mos aint totally stupid the only way to make this stick would be to find the daury person check some phone records etc. Yet he goes to the judges on curacao, without doing his homework, and they refuse his request. What better way to blow your case? Then he does a 180 and starts blaming the media and PRDV for obstructing the investigation, making it impossible for the OM to setup an undercover operation and going into cry baby mode about how unfair it is to Aruba that tourism suffers because of this only case they havent solved in the last 3 to 4 years


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Kat_Gram on March 04, 2008, 07:47:32 PM
      "the phone outside the marriott can only be used to make international calls" 
      What a memory he has. Why would he know that and remember it and use it as a defense ? Is there only one phone booth outside the Marriott ? Or in the vicinity ? Maybe he called his Mumma ...  she was in the NL


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: JE on March 04, 2008, 07:49:21 PM
      I just posted this recently but I want to make sure we have this all in the same place.

      More on white truck....from Fox's At Large Show - Sunday July 31st, 2005

      Jossy states......

      The latest information we have in the investigation is that the police are actively looking for a K-Swiss style shoe - size 14 that belongs to Joran van der Sloot.  Now the police have information that he lost either one or both of his shoes that early morning in which Natalee disappeared. That would be the 30th of May.

      The witness by the landfill tells us that he was sitting in his car and he saw a white pick-up truck drive in, their were 3 occupants and 2 of them got out. Picked up a trash can plastic bag, the black ones, the big ones and they carried it over to where this whole bunch of other bags and rubble was. Now when they were doing that, he says that some blond hair fell out of the bag because the bag was not properly sealed and that he could see parts of human body and then he saw them dig a little among the rubble that was there already and then place this bag there then covered with some other near by lying bags and then put a small pool, plastic pool that babies swim in or bathe in on top of it and then put some more stuff and then walked away.  He also told us that there was another car outside of the cyclone fence, looking on. The man in that car stepped out, he stood by the fence and looked at the whole proceeding's.  We do believe him because from the beginning he has been reliable with his story and it does fit the description we got from another witness between the Holiday Inn and the Marriott Hotel.

      The letter that we received is from the wife of the person with whom this guy was on the beach with between the Holiday Inn and Marriott wrote us because she was getting a annoyed that no one was paying attention to the declaration that this man gave to her husband at the hotel.

      I will read it for you... The day after Natalee was missing a person called Barbeshe (Bar-Be-she) told a story that the night before he saw 3 people in front of the Holiday Inn with a girl's body. That they tried to take a towel from one the "walks fence's" (really hard to understand him here - sounds like he says "water sports dance or fence") to wrap the body and they could not get it down. Then one of them went to the garbage cans at the Holiday Inn and pulled the bags out and wrapped the body, then put her in the white pick-up and left. They went out and turned left towards the lighthouse and turned off on a dirt road and dug a hole and put her in it and threw out the shovel. He also said he told the police and they sent him on a 4 wheeler to try and find, locate the spot and he had been threatened by these people. This person has been seen on the beach everyday has no longer been seen after this and was known to be there daily.

      http://www.riehlworldview.com/carnivorous_conservative/2005/08/fyi.html


      eleye
      Scared Monkey

      Joined: 31 Jul 2005

      PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2005 9:14 am Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote
      "The day after NH was missing, a person called 'Barbishi' told the story that the night before, he saw three people in front of the HI, with the girls body, and that they tried to take a tarp from one of the water-sport tents to wrap the body, and could not get it down.

      Then, that one of them went to the garbage cans at the Hyatt [?] [unclear perhaps' Holiday?], and took the bags out and wrapped the body, put her in a white PU and left. They went out and turned left, towards the light house, and turned off on a dirt road, and dug a hole and put her in it, and threw out the shovel. He also said he told the police, and they send [sic] him on a four wheeler to try and locate the spot.

      And he also said he had been threatened by these people. This person who has been seen on the beach every day, has no longer been seen after this, and he was known to be there daily." [end of letter]

      Well, we know this wasn't Boeti. Who was it?   In front of the HI?  Who is Barbishi?  Is this Barbishi the missing person on the beach? A body???  And yet no one asks any questions.  :roll: :roll:

      There was this Marlon Celaire character a reputed thief or someting that used to hang out at the beaches all the time. It's in one of the security guards PV's he wasn t seen there afterwards again. I also read a story about him havung a white van or pickup


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Rob on March 04, 2008, 07:52:35 PM

      Patrick went to the police in holland but they wouldn't work with him because of some demands he had that the did not agree with. He talked to the police in the eastern part of holland (where he has his company) but they turned it down. They did however tell this to the police in rotterdam because some of their force were involved in the investigation. One thing that stuck with me is that after the PRDV show aired in holland JVDS was on the phone with Pauw&Witteman. He said that he did say all those things to Patrick but that it would be easy to prove that he lied. They asked him to give an example and he said "the phone outside the marriott can only be used to make international calls"  That detail made me wonder if he had a hunch that he was being taped. What i mean is: if he suspected the car was bugged he could have thrown in details that he could disprove. He could also expect a move by the OM to arrest him again. By telling obvious and easy to check lies, Daury comes to mind, the bar for the next arrest would so high that he may be off the hook forever.

      Well, it's been said that he lied. It has yet to be proven. And it's near impossible to prove a negative. He's not impressing me.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: anidac on March 04, 2008, 07:53:55 PM
      I just posted this recently but I want to make sure we have this all in the same place.

      More on white truck....from Fox's At Large Show - Sunday July 31st, 2005

      Jossy states......

      The latest information we have in the investigation is that the police are actively looking for a K-Swiss style shoe - size 14 that belongs to Joran van der Sloot.  Now the police have information that he lost either one or both of his shoes that early morning in which Natalee disappeared. That would be the 30th of May.

      The witness by the landfill tells us that he was sitting in his car and he saw a white pick-up truck drive in, their were 3 occupants and 2 of them got out. Picked up a trash can plastic bag, the black ones, the big ones and they carried it over to where this whole bunch of other bags and rubble was. Now when they were doing that, he says that some blond hair fell out of the bag because the bag was not properly sealed and that he could see parts of human body and then he saw them dig a little among the rubble that was there already and then place this bag there then covered with some other near by lying bags and then put a small pool, plastic pool that babies swim in or bathe in on top of it and then put some more stuff and then walked away.  He also told us that there was another car outside of the cyclone fence, looking on. The man in that car stepped out, he stood by the fence and looked at the whole proceeding's.  We do believe him because from the beginning he has been reliable with his story and it does fit the description we got from another witness between the Holiday Inn and the Marriott Hotel.

      The letter that we received is from the wife of the person with whom this guy was on the beach with between the Holiday Inn and Marriott wrote us because she was getting a annoyed that no one was paying attention to the declaration that this man gave to her husband at the hotel.

      I will read it for you... The day after Natalee was missing a person called Barbeshe (Bar-Be-she) told a story that the night before he saw 3 people in front of the Holiday Inn with a girl's body. That they tried to take a towel from one the "walks fence's" (really hard to understand him here - sounds like he says "water sports dance or fence") to wrap the body and they could not get it down. Then one of them went to the garbage cans at the Holiday Inn and pulled the bags out and wrapped the body, then put her in the white pick-up and left. They went out and turned left towards the lighthouse and turned off on a dirt road and dug a hole and put her in it and threw out the shovel. He also said he told the police and they sent him on a 4 wheeler to try and find, locate the spot and he had been threatened by these people. This person has been seen on the beach everyday has no longer been seen after this and was known to be there daily.

      http://www.riehlworldview.com/carnivorous_conservative/2005/08/fyi.html


      eleye
      Scared Monkey

      Joined: 31 Jul 2005

      PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2005 9:14 am Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote
      "The day after NH was missing, a person called 'Barbishi' told the story that the night before, he saw three people in front of the HI, with the girls body, and that they tried to take a tarp from one of the water-sport tents to wrap the body, and could not get it down.

      Then, that one of them went to the garbage cans at the Hyatt [?] [unclear perhaps' Holiday?], and took the bags out and wrapped the body, put her in a white PU and left. They went out and turned left, towards the light house, and turned off on a dirt road, and dug a hole and put her in it, and threw out the shovel. He also said he told the police, and they send [sic] him on a four wheeler to try and locate the spot.

      And he also said he had been threatened by these people. This person who has been seen on the beach every day, has no longer been seen after this, and he was known to be there daily." [end of letter]

      Well, we know this wasn't Boeti. Who was it?   In front of the HI?  Who is Barbishi?  Is this Barbishi the missing person on the beach? A body???  And yet no one asks any questions.  :roll: :roll:

      This probably adds nothing to the discussion but I just found the following text on a page I used google toolbar to translate the page after viewing the doc as html instead of doc:

      http://tinyurl.com/3crrvj (http://tinyurl.com/3crrvj)


      "The fish that are most at Aruba caught by the fishermen are: Pargo, Mero, Jampau, Conovis, Mulato, Balahu, Rabi'gay, Tuna, Ronda blanca, Barbishi, Fototo, Kekki, Maulo, Glingfish, Hudui, Pishi porco, Cabicushi Seco and Candelchi. Natuurlijk worden er ook andere vissoorten hier gevangen. Of course there are also other fish caught here."


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: JE on March 04, 2008, 07:55:45 PM
      "the phone outside the marriott can only be used to make international calls" 
      What a memory he has. Why would he know that and remember it and use it as a defense ? Is there only one phone booth outside the Marriott ? Or in the vicinity ? Maybe he called his Mumma ...  she was in the NL

      My point exactly why the calculated response in the P&W show, why throw in daury unless at somepoint he knew that info would be checked and would probably clear him. He volunteered the information about daury without thinking twice.whereas in the days before he swore to take it to his grave.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: anidac on March 04, 2008, 07:56:06 PM
      I just posted this recently but I want to make sure we have this all in the same place.

      More on white truck....from Fox's At Large Show - Sunday July 31st, 2005

      Jossy states......

      The latest information we have in the investigation is that the police are actively looking for a K-Swiss style shoe - size 14 that belongs to Joran van der Sloot.  Now the police have information that he lost either one or both of his shoes that early morning in which Natalee disappeared. That would be the 30th of May.

      The witness by the landfill tells us that he was sitting in his car and he saw a white pick-up truck drive in, their were 3 occupants and 2 of them got out. Picked up a trash can plastic bag, the black ones, the big ones and they carried it over to where this whole bunch of other bags and rubble was. Now when they were doing that, he says that some blond hair fell out of the bag because the bag was not properly sealed and that he could see parts of human body and then he saw them dig a little among the rubble that was there already and then place this bag there then covered with some other near by lying bags and then put a small pool, plastic pool that babies swim in or bathe in on top of it and then put some more stuff and then walked away.  He also told us that there was another car outside of the cyclone fence, looking on. The man in that car stepped out, he stood by the fence and looked at the whole proceeding's.  We do believe him because from the beginning he has been reliable with his story and it does fit the description we got from another witness between the Holiday Inn and the Marriott Hotel.

      The letter that we received is from the wife of the person with whom this guy was on the beach with between the Holiday Inn and Marriott wrote us because she was getting a annoyed that no one was paying attention to the declaration that this man gave to her husband at the hotel.

      I will read it for you... The day after Natalee was missing a person called Barbeshe (Bar-Be-she) told a story that the night before he saw 3 people in front of the Holiday Inn with a girl's body. That they tried to take a towel from one the "walks fence's" (really hard to understand him here - sounds like he says "water sports dance or fence") to wrap the body and they could not get it down. Then one of them went to the garbage cans at the Holiday Inn and pulled the bags out and wrapped the body, then put her in the white pick-up and left. They went out and turned left towards the lighthouse and turned off on a dirt road and dug a hole and put her in it and threw out the shovel. He also said he told the police and they sent him on a 4 wheeler to try and find, locate the spot and he had been threatened by these people. This person has been seen on the beach everyday has no longer been seen after this and was known to be there daily.

      http://www.riehlworldview.com/carnivorous_conservative/2005/08/fyi.html


      eleye
      Scared Monkey

      Joined: 31 Jul 2005

      PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2005 9:14 am Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote
      "The day after NH was missing, a person called 'Barbishi' told the story that the night before, he saw three people in front of the HI, with the girls body, and that they tried to take a tarp from one of the water-sport tents to wrap the body, and could not get it down.

      Then, that one of them went to the garbage cans at the Hyatt [?] [unclear perhaps' Holiday?], and took the bags out and wrapped the body, put her in a white PU and left. They went out and turned left, towards the light house, and turned off on a dirt road, and dug a hole and put her in it, and threw out the shovel. He also said he told the police, and they send [sic] him on a four wheeler to try and locate the spot.

      And he also said he had been threatened by these people. This person who has been seen on the beach every day, has no longer been seen after this, and he was known to be there daily." [end of letter]

      Well, we know this wasn't Boeti. Who was it?   In front of the HI?  Who is Barbishi?  Is this Barbishi the missing person on the beach? A body???  And yet no one asks any questions.  :roll: :roll:

      This probably adds nothing to the discussion but I just found the following text on a page I used google toolbar to translate the page after viewing the doc as html instead of doc:

      http://tinyurl.com/3crrvj (http://tinyurl.com/3crrvj)


      "The fish that are most at Aruba caught by the fishermen are: Pargo, Mero, Jampau, Conovis, Mulato, Balahu, Rabi'gay, Tuna, Ronda blanca, Barbishi, Fototo, Kekki, Maulo, Glingfish, Hudui, Pishi porco, Cabicushi Seco and Candelchi. Natuurlijk worden er ook andere vissoorten hier gevangen. Of course there are also other fish caught here."


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Buckeye on March 04, 2008, 07:57:43 PM
      Rob

      If you are back with that "self cleaning" turkey girl, please order the precooked meal.

      Nut

      Thanks for all the links.  Long day today and it was nice to have the search done.  We seem to frequent the same sites. LOL

      Ono

      I remember the dump being emptied into ocean, the same as you described, but can't find info now.  Here is a link to interesting landfill info:

      http://scaredmonkeys.com/2005/07/28/background-information-on-arubas-landfill/#more-1335



      I seem to recall a comment, I think by Jossy, about blood trace in a Sloot vehicle.  Does anyone remember that? TIA


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: bluwaters on March 04, 2008, 07:58:28 PM
      "the phone outside the marriott can only be used to make international calls" 
      What a memory he has. Why would he know that and remember it and use it as a defense ? Is there only one phone booth outside the Marriott ? Or in the vicinity ? Maybe he called his Mumma ...  she was in the NL

       ::MonkeyShocked::



      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Rob on March 04, 2008, 07:58:54 PM
      <snip> He also said he told the police and they sent him on a 4 wheeler to try and find, locate the spot and he had been threatened by these people. This person has been seen on the beach everyday has no longer been seen after this and was known to be there daily.


      van cromvoirt?


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Kat_Gram on March 04, 2008, 08:00:44 PM
      The most incriminating statements from Joran came after he was released from jail in Aruba and he felt confident he would never be charged. That was in January this year. DeVries had said that this release worked in their favor.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Observer on March 04, 2008, 08:01:03 PM

      Well, we know this wasn't Boeti. Who was it?   In front of the HI?  Who is Barbishi?  Is this Barbishi the missing person on the beach? A body???  And yet no one asks any questions.  :roll: :roll:

      There was this Marlon Celaire character a reputed thief or someting that used to hang out at the beaches all the time. It's in one of the security guards PV's he wasn t seen there afterwards again. I also read a story about him havung a white van or pickup

      Too many things here are similar in detail. Fransisco the witness says he helped two others bury a body in a White PU using a blue tarp by the Marriott,This FIsherman person he says he see's 3 people with a body,white PU and tarp. This event was also witnessed by a a guest at one of the Hotels. Then you have the Landfill witness,I think Ill start a thread as too many things are coincidental.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: anidac on March 04, 2008, 08:01:46 PM
      <snip> He also said he told the police and they sent him on a 4 wheeler to try and find, locate the spot and he had been threatened by these people. This person has been seen on the beach everyday has no longer been seen after this and was known to be there daily.


      van cromvoirt?

      rOB,  CAN YOU REMIND ME WHO van cromvoirt IS?


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: JE on March 04, 2008, 08:02:44 PM
      "the phone outside the marriott can only be used to make international calls" 
      What a memory he has. Why would he know that and remember it and use it as a defense ? Is there only one phone booth outside the Marriott ? Or in the vicinity ? Maybe he called his Mumma ...  she was in the NL

       ::MonkeyShocked::



      PRDV who was at the P&W show also said he could have called someone with a dutch cell phone, meaning he had to make an intenational call for some reason. But IMO that could have easily been checked


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Buckeye on March 04, 2008, 08:02:45 PM

      Patrick went to the police in holland but they wouldn't work with him because of some demands he had that the did not agree with. He talked to the police in the eastern part of holland (where he has his company) but they turned it down. They did however tell this to the police in rotterdam because some of their force were involved in the investigation. One thing that stuck with me is that after the PRDV show aired in holland JVDS was on the phone with Pauw&Witteman. He said that he did say all those things to Patrick but that it would be easy to prove that he lied. They asked him to give an example and he said "the phone outside the marriott can only be used to make international calls"  That detail made me wonder if he had a hunch that he was being taped. What i mean is: if he suspected the car was bugged he could have thrown in details that he could disprove. He could also expect a move by the OM to arrest him again. By telling obvious and easy to check lies, Daury comes to mind, the bar for the next arrest would so high that he may be off the hook forever.

      Well, it's been said that he lied. It has yet to be proven. And it's near impossible to prove a negative. He's not impressing me.

      And Renfro was already hard at work posting about phone etc....so I'm sure he was updated.  He also said he talked to his parents etc.  The guy had help....to cover his a** again.

      Well, if he does talk to Jensen....let's vote....will we blame grandma.....the uncle in Germany???.....the aunt we haven't heard from???  Who will be to blame for Joran talking on the phone??  He chats to everyone but the authorities...amazing that the system can't/refuses to nail him!!!


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Buckeye on March 04, 2008, 08:05:48 PM
      The most incriminating statements from Joran came after he was released from jail in Aruba and he felt confident he would never be charged. That was in January this year. DeVries had said that this release worked in their favor.


       :smt045 :smt045 :smt045

      and I don't care about Patrick's motivation or background.  The words are Joran's.  Right down to the 10 year family compensation plan....ya he was too drugged to make sense....sheesh...


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Rob on March 04, 2008, 08:09:29 PM
      <snip> He also said he told the police and they sent him on a 4 wheeler to try and find, locate the spot and he had been threatened by these people. This person has been seen on the beach everyday has no longer been seen after this and was known to be there daily.


      van cromvoirt?

      rOB,  CAN YOU REMIND ME WHO van cromvoirt IS?

      Geoffrey van Cromvoirt. His father owned VCB secruity and he was a former Visibility team member. I believe he was fired from the VT.

      He was arrested in March of 06 if I remember correctly. Went to jail with his blankey and pillows. Was released when he said nothing.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: anidac on March 04, 2008, 08:10:58 PM
      <snip> He also said he told the police and they sent him on a 4 wheeler to try and find, locate the spot and he had been threatened by these people. This person has been seen on the beach everyday has no longer been seen after this and was known to be there daily.


      van cromvoirt?

      rOB,  CAN YOU REMIND ME WHO van cromvoirt IS?

      Geoffrey van Cromvoirt. His father owned VCB secruity and he was a former Visibility team member. I believe he was fired from the VT.

      He was arrested in March of 06 if I remember correctly. Went to jail with his blankey and pillows. Was released when he said nothing.

      Thank you.  I remember him now.  Please forgive my recent typos.  I was juggling the little ones. 


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Rob on March 04, 2008, 08:12:57 PM

      Patrick went to the police in holland but they wouldn't work with him because of some demands he had that the did not agree with. He talked to the police in the eastern part of holland (where he has his company) but they turned it down. They did however tell this to the police in rotterdam because some of their force were involved in the investigation. One thing that stuck with me is that after the PRDV show aired in holland JVDS was on the phone with Pauw&Witteman. He said that he did say all those things to Patrick but that it would be easy to prove that he lied. They asked him to give an example and he said "the phone outside the marriott can only be used to make international calls"  That detail made me wonder if he had a hunch that he was being taped. What i mean is: if he suspected the car was bugged he could have thrown in details that he could disprove. He could also expect a move by the OM to arrest him again. By telling obvious and easy to check lies, Daury comes to mind, the bar for the next arrest would so high that he may be off the hook forever.

      Well, it's been said that he lied. It has yet to be proven. And it's near impossible to prove a negative. He's not impressing me.

      And Renfro was already hard at work posting about phone etc....so I'm sure he was updated.  He also said he talked to his parents etc.  The guy had help....to cover his a** again.

      Well, if he does talk to Jensen....let's vote....will we blame grandma.....the uncle in Germany???.....the aunt we haven't heard from???  Who will be to blame for Joran talking on the phone??  He chats to everyone but the authorities...amazing that the system can't/refuses to nail him!!!

      Hi Buckeye, what about blaming that wacked out grandfather of his? That guy is insane.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: JusticeforNatalee on March 04, 2008, 08:13:06 PM
      Posted by Heli at RU:   ::MonkeyHaHa::

      Quote
      GMAFB - hasn't Joran learned yet to keep his pie hole SHUT !!!!!!

      Is he determined to screw himself completely in the eyes of the public?
      If I was his mother, I'd be reading him the riot act; adult or no adult
      he'd be making some hard choices because his sorry ass is in no position
      to get himself through this without the help of his parents and his family.
      Is he not thinking about what this is doing to his younger brothers?


      What exactly is Joran getting himself through?

      More like: getting away with!



       


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: JE on March 04, 2008, 08:13:54 PM
      <snip> He also said he told the police and they sent him on a 4 wheeler to try and find, locate the spot and he had been threatened by these people. This person has been seen on the beach everyday has no longer been seen after this and was known to be there daily.


      van cromvoirt?

      rOB,  CAN YOU REMIND ME WHO van cromvoirt IS?

      Geoffrey van Cromvoirt. His father owned VCB secruity and he was a former Visibility team member. I believe he was fired from the VT.

      He was arrested in March of 06 if I remember correctly. Went to jail with his blankey and pillows. Was released when he said nothing.

      Thank you.  I remember him now.  Please forgive my recent typos.  I was juggling the little ones. 

      Amigoe; April 21, 2006: ‘The families Van Cromvoirt and Van der Sloot not friends’

          ARUBA — “The Van Cromvoirt family dissociate herself expressly from all the statements that associate Geoffrey van Cromvoirt to the disappearance of Natalee Holloway”, stated Eline Lotter Homan, lawyer of family Van Cromvoirt in a written press release. “Due to persistent speculations, it is advisable to rectify the many completely untrue propositions put forward”, was her reaction on the many questions she gets from the different media.

          Lotter Homan says that it is impossible to react on all possible propositions that are going around. She also didn’t want to react as regards content on the current judicial preliminary investigation. She states furthermore in her press release that “the facts that are being described in this are not meant for a restrictive refutation.”

          In May and June of last year, Van Cromvoirt hadn’t worked for the Visibility Team or VCB Video Camera Security Systems & Consultancy. The lawyer confirmed that the family Van Cromvoirt had not at all been interrogated in connection with the investigation on the disappearance of the American girl. Rumors about Joran van der Sloot and Van Cromvoirt being friends are heavily denied. “Geoffrey is not a friend of any of the earlier arrested persons in the disappearance of Natalee Holloway and has also no other relationship with any of them.”


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: anidac on March 04, 2008, 08:15:42 PM
      Babishi = "Goatfish"  (Yellow or Spotted)

      Used as luar or bait in traps and found in Aruba's waters.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Buckeye on March 04, 2008, 08:17:33 PM
      Yes Rob

      That apple not falling far from the tree business.  Seems the Hugen's have an orchard. 


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: JE on March 04, 2008, 08:19:50 PM
      The most incriminating statements from Joran came after he was released from jail in Aruba and he felt confident he would never be charged. That was in January this year. DeVries had said that this release worked in their favor.


       :smt045 :smt045 :smt045

      and I don't care about Patrick's motivation or background.  The words are Joran's.  Right down to the 10 year family compensation plan....ya he was too drugged to make sense....sheesh...

      buckeye i feel in my gut that JVDS and associates are as guilty as the place where the proverbial snowball melts,
      but what puzzles me is how a person can incriminate himself to such a degree (in the taped conversations with patrick) while at the same time slipping in some crucial details that let him off the hook. And that could have been so easily checked by the OM before the put in their request to have him arrested again?


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: KarmaRoundUp on March 04, 2008, 08:25:44 PM
      Rob

      If you are back with that "self cleaning" turkey girl, please order the precooked meal.

      Nut

      Thanks for all the links.  Long day today and it was nice to have the search done.  We seem to frequent the same sites. LOL

      Ono

      I remember the dump being emptied into ocean, the same as you described, but can't find info now.  Here is a link to interesting landfill info:

      http://scaredmonkeys.com/2005/07/28/background-information-on-arubas-landfill/#more-1335



      I seem to recall a comment, I think by Jossy, about blood trace in a Sloot vehicle.  Does anyone remember that? TIA
      I remember that,it was stated by Jossy in a Greta interview I believe.Right around the time they took the van der ditches autos....middle of june 05?


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Bladerunner on March 04, 2008, 08:39:47 PM
      Yes Rob

      That apple not falling far from the tree business.  Seems the Hugen's have an orchard. 

      No doubt about that:


      I just saw this in the comment section on GW--posted by MDJ_NL

       was just reading this…

      According to grandpa Van der Sloot it is, because of his age, not that foolish what his grandson did. His grandfather said so in an interview with BNR.nl. I tried my best to translate it as correct as possible.

      grandfather: Well, we told them (his parents) some things, but yes.. ofcourse it is eh… their son…
      reporter: Does it frighten you when you see your grandson like that, on tv?
      grandfather: Well, I’ve seen him before on tv, as well with a (small) glass of wine.
      reporter: Yes that’s true ofcourse, that wine incident when he tosses that glass of red wine at Pieter R de Vries..
      grandfather: Now, let’s not exaggerate, a glass of wine… there was just a little bit of wine left in that glass. Such a b####rd (he means Peter R de Vries) should have been fooled more often, but well, that’s my opinion.
      reporter: Didn’t it frighten you what your grandson says in that episode of Peter R de Vries?
      grandfather: What is frighting, what is frightening… it’s a boy of 20 years old… well… there are more commiting other foolery.

      My guess?
      It runs in the family.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Ono on March 04, 2008, 08:41:23 PM
      Rob

      If you are back with that "self cleaning" turkey girl, please order the precooked meal.

      Nut

      Thanks for all the links.  Long day today and it was nice to have the search done.  We seem to frequent the same sites. LOL

      Ono

      I remember the dump being emptied into ocean, the same as you described, but can't find info now.  Here is a link to interesting landfill info:

      http://scaredmonkeys.com/2005/07/28/background-information-on-arubas-landfill/#more-1335



      I seem to recall a comment, I think by Jossy, about blood trace in a Sloot vehicle.  Does anyone remember that? TIA


      Thanks Buckeye!    ::MonkeyCool::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Buckeye on March 04, 2008, 08:45:53 PM
      The most incriminating statements from Joran came after he was released from jail in Aruba and he felt confident he would never be charged. That was in January this year. DeVries had said that this release worked in their favor.


       :smt045 :smt045 :smt045

      and I don't care about Patrick's motivation or background.  The words are Joran's.  Right down to the 10 year family compensation plan....ya he was too drugged to make sense....sheesh...

      buckeye i feel in my gut that JVDS and associates are as guilty as the place where the proverbial snowball melts,
      but what puzzles me is how a person can incriminate himself to such a degree (in the taped conversations with patrick) while at the same time slipping in some crucial details that let him off the hook. And that could have been so easily checked by the OM before the put in their request to have him arrested again?

      He may have been getting suspicious, at the end. Personally, I think, like many that lie....the jest is accurate, but liars have a tendency to add specifics, like the description of the security guards, etc.  He believes he is clever so he needs to tell a full story.  I think he was at a house (why did he text flo and call her at midnight, also?) or the Racquet Club...I think he made a call....I just think he lucked out about the Marriott phone helping him....geesh...he probably has a phone card in someone elses name...right next to his VIP cards....or his dad's VIP cards....


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Observer on March 04, 2008, 08:47:55 PM
      Rob

      If you are back with that "self cleaning" turkey girl, please order the precooked meal.

      Nut

      Thanks for all the links.  Long day today and it was nice to have the search done.  We seem to frequent the same sites. LOL

      Ono

      I remember the dump being emptied into ocean, the same as you described, but can't find info now.  Here is a link to interesting landfill info:

      http://scaredmonkeys.com/2005/07/28/background-information-on-arubas-landfill/#more-1335



      I seem to recall a comment, I think by Jossy, about blood trace in a Sloot vehicle.  Does anyone remember that? TIA


      Thanks Buckeye!    ::MonkeyCool::
      Newspaper reports said there was blood in one of the suspects vehicles,his father was a judge on the island..etc..Not sure if that was a mistake or not and getting the vehicle confused with Deepak's..Besides the intentional mis-information there have been idiot reporters that never cared to research what they were talking about.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Observer on March 04, 2008, 08:57:22 PM
        Suspect multi-million fraud at National Lab arrested

      ORANJESTAD – Upon request of the Aruban Public Prosecutor (OM), the American authorities have arrested a 53-year old man, who is suspected of embezzling 5 million florins at the National Lab, where he used to work.  The arrest took place in Miami last Saturday.

      The National Lab reported a large-scale fraud late last year.  However, the former employee M.M.F. has already fled to Colombia at that time.  The OM issued an international warrant for the suspect’s arrest, and with success.  The American authorities tipped the OM when the suspect traveled to the US last Thursday.  “We issued a request for provisional arrest, which took place on Saturday”, said chief district attorney Hans Mos, who is very pleased with the good cooperation with the American authorities.

      F. is suspected of embezzlement, forgery, fraud, and money laundering.  He was placing orders with non-existing suppliers in the US.  The media reported embezzlement of 10 million florins, but according to Mos, the amount is 5 million florins in five-year time.  F. was brought up in Florida today, whereby Aruba has submitted a request for his extradition.  If the suspect agrees with the extradition request, he will be sent to Aruba in two weeks.

      http://www.amigoe.com/english/


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Buckeye on March 04, 2008, 09:03:10 PM
      From Frank's site.  Do we have the original transcript?


      09. SNEAKER WITH BLOOD STAIN – FORENSIC REPORT

      Early in the investigation Beth Twitty was informed by Aruban police investigators that blood was found inside one of Joran's tennis shoes that he had worn on the morning of May 30, 2005. Beth was assured by investigators that the blood would be forensically tested. However, the findings have not been revealed.


      http://arubadirtypolice.blogspot.com/2006/12/dompig-they-did-have-sex-with-natalee.html


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Buckeye on March 04, 2008, 09:05:07 PM
      Suspect multi-million fraud at National Lab arrested

      ORANJESTAD – Upon request of the Aruban Public Prosecutor (OM), the American authorities have arrested a 53-year old man, who is suspected of embezzling 5 million florins at the National Lab, where he used to work.  The arrest took place in Miami last Saturday.

      The National Lab reported a large-scale fraud late last year.  However, the former employee M.M.F. has already fled to Colombia at that time.  The OM issued an international warrant for the suspect’s arrest, and with success.  The American authorities tipped the OM when the suspect traveled to the US last Thursday.  “We issued a request for provisional arrest, which took place on Saturday”, said chief district attorney Hans Mos, who is very pleased with the good cooperation with the American authorities.

      F. is suspected of embezzlement, forgery, fraud, and money laundering.  He was placing orders with non-existing suppliers in the US.  The media reported embezzlement of 10 million florins, but according to Mos, the amount is 5 million florins in five-year time.  F. was brought up in Florida today, whereby Aruba has submitted a request for his extradition.  If the suspect agrees with the extradition request, he will be sent to Aruba in two weeks.

      http://www.amigoe.com/english/

      Don't know about The National Lab, but Guido's dad is a biggy in a lab.  He had been giving lectures.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Tater on March 04, 2008, 09:07:19 PM
      Junior described a child's plastic pool which had been used to cover Natalee's body.  Two months later ... the search in the the landfill by Dave Holloway and TEA reveal a child's plastic pool in the area which Junior claims that Natalee had been placed.

      Janet

      ++++++++++

      Jossy Mansur
      NANCY GRACE
      August 3, 2005


      GRACE: And Jossy, have you heard any information regarding a search for one of those little kiddie pools?

      MANSUR: They have been searching for that. They have found one, and they`re concentrating on that area where this witness says that when they dumped the body, they covered it with some other bags and then put this little pool on it.

      GRACE: OK, I`m sorry. I didn`t hear that. Repeat, Jossy.
       
      MANSUR: They are searching where -- they did find this -- one of these pools, this pool, and they have been searching in that specific area because we have to remember that this garbage has been moved about quite a bit from that day on by big tractors and front-end loaders and whatever.
       
      http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0508/03/ng.01.html

      The question then becomes what happened to her body when it was removed from the landfill?

      I say she was then put in the trap and carried by helicopter out 40 miles past the continental shelf under the cover of darkness and dropped....My second theory,one of the deep sea fishing charters did Paulas the pervie a favor....High winds knocked out my cable today and it just now came back on.....


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Observer on March 04, 2008, 09:08:16 PM

      Don't know about The National Lab, but Guido's dad is a biggy in a lab.  He had been giving lectures.

      This guy? Robert Wever/politician and the chairman of the Aliansa / MSA.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Rob on March 04, 2008, 09:10:37 PM
      Suspect multi-million fraud at National Lab arrested

      ORANJESTAD – Upon request of the Aruban Public Prosecutor (OM), the American authorities have arrested a 53-year old man, who is suspected of embezzling 5 million florins at the National Lab, where he used to work.  The arrest took place in Miami last Saturday.

      The National Lab reported a large-scale fraud late last year.  However, the former employee M.M.F. has already fled to Colombia at that time.  The OM issued an international warrant for the suspect’s arrest, and with success.  The American authorities tipped the OM when the suspect traveled to the US last Thursday.  “We issued a request for provisional arrest, which took place on Saturday”, said chief district attorney Hans Mos, who is very pleased with the good cooperation with the American authorities.

      F. is suspected of embezzlement, forgery, fraud, and money laundering.  He was placing orders with non-existing suppliers in the US.  The media reported embezzlement of 10 million florins, but according to Mos, the amount is 5 million florins in five-year time.  F. was brought up in Florida today, whereby Aruba has submitted a request for his extradition.  If the suspect agrees with the extradition request, he will be sent to Aruba in two weeks.

      http://www.amigoe.com/english/

      Don't know about The National Lab, but Guido's dad is a biggy in a lab.  He had been giving lectures.

      Rudy Croes was a lab tech at one time.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Buckeye on March 04, 2008, 09:12:10 PM
      Dec 15, 2005.....Beth Twitty:

      ...But as far as the letter goes, I just think that is something that really just—they could have addressed that personally.  I mean, I think we need to stay focused on the bloody tennis shoe that was found, the blood on the vehicle that was found and keep our focus on those types of criminal evidence and looking forward to a prosecuting attorney coming in, whoever this is from Curacao.  And I hope whoever this is will be received by the authorities there on the island well and also by the attorney general‘s office. ...

      http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10439299/


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Observer on March 04, 2008, 09:12:11 PM

      The question then becomes what happened to her body when it was removed from the landfill?

      I say she was then put in the trap and carried by helicopter out 40 miles past the continental shelf under the cover of darkness and dropped....My second theory,one of the deep sea fishing charters did Paulas the pervie a favor....High winds knocked out my cable today and it just now came back on.....

      If a helicopter was used she will never be found. We know the evil one has plenty of Helicopters at his disposal.

      (http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/observer0000007/rudyagain.jpg)

      (http://img521.imageshack.us/img521/240/0725kustwachtqz1.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Buckeye on March 04, 2008, 09:12:39 PM

      Don't know about The National Lab, but Guido's dad is a biggy in a lab.  He had been giving lectures.

      This guy? Robert Wever/politician and the chairman of the Aliansa / MSA.

      Yep


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: JE on March 04, 2008, 09:14:02 PM
      Suspect multi-million fraud at National Lab arrested

      ORANJESTAD – Upon request of the Aruban Public Prosecutor (OM), the American authorities have arrested a 53-year old man, who is suspected of embezzling 5 million florins at the National Lab, where he used to work.  The arrest took place in Miami last Saturday.

      The National Lab reported a large-scale fraud late last year.  However, the former employee M.M.F. has already fled to Colombia at that time.  The OM issued an international warrant for the suspect’s arrest, and with success.  The American authorities tipped the OM when the suspect traveled to the US last Thursday.  “We issued a request for provisional arrest, which took place on Saturday”, said chief district attorney Hans Mos, who is very pleased with the good cooperation with the American authorities.

      F. is suspected of embezzlement, forgery, fraud, and money laundering.  He was placing orders with non-existing suppliers in the US.  The media reported embezzlement of 10 million florins, but according to Mos, the amount is 5 million florins in five-year time.  F. was brought up in Florida today, whereby Aruba has submitted a request for his extradition.  If the suspect agrees with the extradition request, he will be sent to Aruba in two weeks.

      http://www.amigoe.com/english/

      Don't know about The National Lab, but Guido's dad is a biggy in a lab.  He had been giving lectures.

      Rudy Croes was a lab tech at one time.

      M.M.F = Maiky Farro


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Tamikosmom on March 04, 2008, 09:14:04 PM
      WITNESS CLAIMS HE HELPED BURY NATALEE HOLLOWAY ON THE MORNING SHE WENT MISSING.

      WITNESS CLAIMS VEHICLES USED WERE SIMILAR TO VEHICLES IDENTIFIED BY THE LANDFILL WITNESS.

      WITNESS IS IN A PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITAL.


      http://video.msn.com/video.aspx?mkt=en-US&brand=msnbc&vid=08117149-1e27-4191-8c4c-4fe37b86cba8


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Tamikosmom on March 04, 2008, 09:17:34 PM
      Dec 15, 2005.....Beth Twitty:

      ...But as far as the letter goes, I just think that is something that really just—they could have addressed that personally.  I mean, I think we need to stay focused on the bloody tennis shoe that was found, the blood on the vehicle that was found and keep our focus on those types of criminal evidence and looking forward to a prosecuting attorney coming in, whoever this is from Curacao.  And I hope whoever this is will be received by the authorities there on the island well and also by the attorney general‘s office. ...

      http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10439299/

      Thank you Buckeye.

      Janet


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Observer on March 04, 2008, 09:21:24 PM
      Rob

      If you are back with that "self cleaning" turkey girl, please order the precooked meal.

      Nut

      Thanks for all the links.  Long day today and it was nice to have the search done.  We seem to frequent the same sites. LOL

      Ono


      I remember the dump being emptied into ocean, the same as you described, but can't find info now.  Here is a link to interesting landfill info:

      http://scaredmonkeys.com/2005/07/28/background-information-on-arubas-landfill/#more-1335



      I seem to recall a comment, I think by Jossy, about blood trace in a Sloot vehicle.  Does anyone remember that? TIA


      Thanks Buckeye!    ::MonkeyCool::

      We know they cut squares out of one of those cars on the seat and headliner. We also saw the Aruban Newspaper article that blood was found in one of the sloot vehicles. Not sure if the article was a typo or not.
      The "Diario," a local daily newspaper, is reporting that a human blood sample found in a car at the residence of one of the teens in custody — the 17-year-old son of a high-ranking island judicuary official — is now being sent to the U.S. and will be tested for a possible match to Natalee, whose mother gave a blood sample to investigators.

      http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,159252,00.html


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Observer on March 04, 2008, 09:26:20 PM
      Dec 15, 2005.....Beth Twitty:

      ...But as far as the letter goes, I just think that is something that really just—they could have addressed that personally.  I mean, I think we need to stay focused on the bloody tennis shoe that was found, the blood on the vehicle that was found

      http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10439299/
      Yeh well then it went from having a bloody tennis shoe to searching for one missing shoe..To a pair of missing shoes size 14..Then a KLPD measures Jorans feet he doesnt even wear size 14 but a size 10.5   ::MonkeyConfused::

      The Blood in the vehicle turned out to be chocolate and cleaning fluids..If you look at the PV there is no name on it!!!!!!! All the other documents have a name but one of them at the NFI does not!!


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Buckeye on March 04, 2008, 09:30:55 PM
      Can't get it to open now...weird...but....it is The National Lab!!!

      Google search...but won't open...

      [PDF]
      STEPS Aruba 2006
      File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - View as HTML
      Robert Wever, PhD. from the National. Laboratory coordinated all the biochemical analyses. We thank all the abovementioned individuals and all the other ...
      www.overheid.aw/index.asp?nmoduleid=4&wgid=6&spagetype=6&docid=1522 - Similar pages


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Observer on March 04, 2008, 09:37:52 PM
      Can't get it to open now...weird...but....it is The National Lab!!!

      Google search...but won't open...

      [PDF]
      STEPS Aruba 2006
      File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - View as HTML
      Robert Wever, PhD. from the National. Laboratory coordinated all the biochemical analyses. We thank all the abovementioned individuals and all the other ...
      www.overheid.aw/index.asp?nmoduleid=4&wgid=6&spagetype=6&docid=1522 - Similar pages

      Hmmm Thats quite interesting! I have always wondered if Booshi was connected to Robert and Guido and I believe they are. Would not suprise me at all if that is Guido's Uncle Booshi!


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Buckeye on March 04, 2008, 09:39:29 PM
      Can't get it to open now...weird...but....it is The National Lab!!!

      Google search...but won't open...

      [PDF]
      STEPS Aruba 2006
      File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - View as HTML
      Robert Wever, PhD. from the National. Laboratory coordinated all the biochemical analyses. We thank all the abovementioned individuals and all the other ...
      www.overheid.aw/index.asp?nmoduleid=4&wgid=6&spagetype=6&docid=1522 - Similar pages

      Hmmm Thats quite interesting! I have always wondered if Booshi was connected to Robert and Guido and I believe they are. Would not suprise me at all if that is Uncle Booshi!

      I gave up on trying to figure out island connections when they all had three+ names and then "street" names.   ::MonkeyConfused::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Buckeye on March 04, 2008, 09:42:36 PM
      I still contend there is something BIG with Guido.

      The Dutch posters can correct me, but I think it is major to leave the school year, before it ends.  I think the whole year must be completed, not just the missed classes.  Guido was so close to graduating and left before completion.  I still think that is why they waited to arrest Joran until the day after he graduated.  Guido would have never left Dodge that fast without a BIG reason.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Observer on March 04, 2008, 09:45:31 PM
      Can't get it to open now...weird...but....it is The National Lab!!!

      Google search...but won't open...

      [PDF]
      STEPS Aruba 2006
      File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - View as HTML
      Robert Wever, PhD. from the National. Laboratory coordinated all the biochemical analyses. We thank all the abovementioned individuals and all the other ...
      www.overheid.aw/index.asp?nmoduleid=4&wgid=6&spagetype=6&docid=1522 - Similar pages

      Hmmm Thats quite interesting! I have always wondered if Booshi was connected to Robert and Guido and I believe they are. Would not suprise me at all if that is Uncle Booshi!

      I gave up on trying to figure out island connections when they all had three+ names and then "street" names.   ::MonkeyConfused::

      LOL! But then they change there name just slightly as well like Van Gijn,Van Rien,Van Der Straaten..Etc..I found the witness Sanches the other day from the Raquetball Club because his real last name is Sanchez.. :( Then you have two Candelerio Wevers or is it just one? Then we have names that are possibly just a coincidence like Max Arends and Max Arendsz  ::MonkeyWink::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Buckeye on March 04, 2008, 09:47:39 PM
      Thank God for the turncoats: Renfro, Purcell....easy to remember and find........... ::MonkeyHaHa::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Observer on March 04, 2008, 09:55:05 PM
      I still contend there is something BIG with Guido.

      The Dutch posters can correct me, but I think it is major to leave the school year, before it ends.  I think the whole year must be completed, not just the missed classes.  Guido was so close to graduating and left before completion.  I still think that is why they waited to arrest Joran until the day after he graduated.  Guido would have never left Dodge that fast without a BIG reason.

      Of Course..He also left his internship at the Excelsior plenty short as well..Just bought a brand new car which I think the ALE lied and said they were looking for a White rented Toyota...Of course they never found it because it was probably Guido's White Nissan..

      But the Family will tell you he fled I mean had it all planned out that way..

      We have these Dutch reports that say he fled to Canada and not Holland which I believe are true..If you read all the big arrests in Ontario that is where the sicilian Mob is..I think Guido went there until the smoked cleared then went to Holland for school. I bet there is no record of any college in Canada for Guido Wever.
      ==============================================

      I noticed the closing remarks on this video.."One report out of Aruba is Guido is considered a alibi witness for Joran"...

      May 21, 2006
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0iUKXXFreaY
      -------------------------------------------------

      The arrested boy is hot Guido Wever, he has been detained and interrogated in the Netherlands. He is Aruba moved to Canada 14 days after Natalee disappeared. He was a croupier at the Holliday Inn and Casino has previously interrogated by the Aruban police. According to his lawyer Spong, the boy suspected of "complicity in murder, grievous bodily injury and deprivation of liberty of Natalee Holloway.

            The boy lived in Aruba and went to the Mon Plaisir School. The boy is also seen in the company of Natalee. He came to school with a lot of scratches on his body. The boy was almost done with school and would continue studying in the Netherlands. He asked his parents if he was allowed to Canada earlier. He was on two weeks after finished school when he heard of his possible arrest and then fled to the Netherlands.

            The boy, according to witness testimony on May 30, 2005 have been at school with scratches and injuries on his face. He would also be part of the group who were arrested earlier.

            He was previously interrogated as a witness, 3x by the Aruban police and twice by the Dutch police.

            Gerard Spong, the boy's lawyer, told the NOS news that the suspect is a friend of Joran van der Sloot - those are certain that he Natalee was last seen. Van der Sloot says he left Holloway alone on the beach after her gezoend to have.

            (Source: Awemainta & arubadirtypolice)
      ---------------------------------------------------
      The Algemeen Dagblad will publish this morning:

            Quote:
            The Utrecht police last week a former croupier arrested on suspicion of kidnapping and murder of Natalee Holloway on Aruba. Gerard Spong, lawyer of the suspect, a span today interim measures to prevent extradition to Aruba.

            The suspect, Guido W., is a Dutchman who lived in Aruba at the time of the loss of Holloway. W. Is a tennismaatje of Joran van der Sloot and worked three months as a trainee croupier at the casino in the hotel where Holloway stayed. On May 30, when Holloway was missing only a few hours, was W. Also work. "He looked strange,''recalls a member of the Aruban casino itself.,, He came within worrisome.''

            W. Worked a few days in the casino, but was previously on a dangepland. He departed in June to Canada to study.
      After Holloway's disappearance is W. Several times in Aruba and the Netherlands, heard as a witness.

            Holloway came during her vacation on Aruba often in the casino. Even on the last evening that she was seen alive, she was there. They with when Van der Sloot, who still is suspected of involvement in Holloway's disappearance. But he is due to a lack of evidence on free feet. The arrest of Guido W. Took place at the request of the Public Prosecutor's Office (OM) in Aruba. The suspect is stuck in Utrecht.
      ---------------------------
      http://forum.fok.nl/topic/837319/6/50 (translated)


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: klaasend on March 04, 2008, 09:55:51 PM
      Can't get it to open now...weird...but....it is The National Lab!!!

      Google search...but won't open...

      [PDF]
      STEPS Aruba 2006
      File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - View as HTML
      Robert Wever, PhD. from the National. Laboratory coordinated all the biochemical analyses. We thank all the abovementioned individuals and all the other ...
      www.overheid.aw/index.asp?nmoduleid=4&wgid=6&spagetype=6&docid=1522 - Similar pages

      Buckeye - GREAT FIND!

      (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/NatLab2copy.jpg)

      Suspect multi-million fraud at National Lab arrested

      ORANJESTAD – Upon request of the Aruban Public Prosecutor (OM), the American authorities have arrested a 53-year old man, who is suspected of embezzling 5 million florins at the National Lab, where he used to work.  The arrest took place in Miami last Saturday.

      The National Lab reported a large-scale fraud late last year.  However, the former employee M.M.F. has already fled to Colombia at that time.  The OM issued an international warrant for the suspect’s arrest, and with success.  The American authorities tipped the OM when the suspect traveled to the US last Thursday.  “We issued a request for provisional arrest, which took place on Saturday”, said chief district attorney Hans Mos, who is very pleased with the good cooperation with the American authorities.

      F. is suspected of embezzlement, forgery, fraud, and money laundering.  He was placing orders with non-existing suppliers in the US.  The media reported embezzlement of 10 million florins, but according to Mos, the amount is 5 million florins in five-year time.  F. was brought up in Florida today, whereby Aruba has submitted a request for his extradition.  If the suspect agrees with the extradition request, he will be sent to Aruba in two weeks.



      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Castaglance on March 04, 2008, 10:04:35 PM
      Rob

      If you are back with that "self cleaning" turkey girl, please order the precooked meal.

      Nut

      Rob has a turkey girl??? I am so confused...




      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Buckeye on March 04, 2008, 10:15:45 PM
      Castaglance

      Had to sign back on for this.

      Your quote looks like Nut was confused, but I know it was you.

      Rob had a girlfriend that cooked a turkey on the self cleaning oven setting.  Needless to say, there wasn't much to eat.  It was an early, funny, story.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Observer on March 04, 2008, 10:18:07 PM
      Castaglance

      Had to sign back on for this.

      Your quote looks like Nut was confused, but I know it was you.

      Rob had a girlfriend that cooked a turkey on the self cleaning oven setting.  Needless to say, there wasn't much to eat.  It was an early, funny, story.

      Beef Jerkey Turkey?  ::MonkeyLaugh::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: ala_gunslinger on March 04, 2008, 10:20:36 PM
      Rob

      If you are back with that "self cleaning" turkey girl, please order the precooked meal.

      Nut

      Thanks for all the links.  Long day today and it was nice to have the search done.  We seem to frequent the same sites. LOL

      Ono


      I remember the dump being emptied into ocean, the same as you described, but can't find info now.  Here is a link to interesting landfill info:

      http://scaredmonkeys.com/2005/07/28/background-information-on-arubas-landfill/#more-1335



      I seem to recall a comment, I think by Jossy, about blood trace in a Sloot vehicle.  Does anyone remember that? TIA


      Thanks Buckeye!    ::MonkeyCool::

      We know they cut squares out of one of those cars on the seat and headliner. We also saw the Aruban Newspaper article that blood was found in one of the sloot vehicles. Not sure if the article was a typo or not.
      The "Diario," a local daily newspaper, is reporting that a human blood sample found in a car at the residence of one of the teens in custody — the 17-year-old son of a high-ranking island judicuary official — is now being sent to the U.S. and will be tested for a possible match to Natalee, whose mother gave a blood sample to investigators.

      http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,159252,00.html


      and so the cover-up began!!!



      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Buckeye on March 04, 2008, 10:20:43 PM
      Castaglance

      Had to sign back on for this.

      Your quote looks like Nut was confused, but I know it was you.

      Rob had a girlfriend that cooked a turkey on the self cleaning oven setting.  Needless to say, there wasn't much to eat.  It was an early, funny, story.

      Beef Jerkey Turkey?  ::MonkeyLaugh::




       ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Lala'sMom on March 04, 2008, 10:21:41 PM
      Can't get it to open now...weird...but....it is The National Lab!!!

      Google search...but won't open...

      [PDF]
      STEPS Aruba 2006
      File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - View as HTML
      Robert Wever, PhD. from the National. Laboratory coordinated all the biochemical analyses. We thank all the abovementioned individuals and all the other ...
      www.overheid.aw/index.asp?nmoduleid=4&wgid=6&spagetype=6&docid=1522 - Similar pages

      Hmmm Thats quite interesting! I have always wondered if Booshi was connected to Robert and Guido and I believe they are. Would not suprise me at all if that is Uncle Booshi!

      I gave up on trying to figure out island connections when they all had three+ names and then "street" names.   ::MonkeyConfused::

      LOL! But then they change there name just slightly as well like Van Gijn,Van Rien,Van Der Straaten..Etc..I found the witness Sanches the other day from the Raquetball Club because his real last name is Sanchez.. :( Then you have two Candelerio Wevers or is it just one? Then we have names that are possibly just a coincidence like Max Arends and Max Arendsz  ::MonkeyWink::

      I bet you didn't know there is/was a Freddy Arends that is/was the supervisor of the San Nicolas Section of the Public Health Laboratory.  (Info courtesy of MuminOhio)


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: ala_gunslinger on March 04, 2008, 10:21:55 PM
      Dec 15, 2005.....Beth Twitty:

      ...But as far as the letter goes, I just think that is something that really just—they could have addressed that personally.  I mean, I think we need to stay focused on the bloody tennis shoe that was found, the blood on the vehicle that was found

      http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10439299/
      Yeh well then it went from having a bloody tennis shoe to searching for one missing shoe..To a pair of missing shoes size 14..Then a KLPD measures Jorans feet he doesnt even wear size 14 but a size 10.5   ::MonkeyConfused::

      The Blood in the vehicle turned out to be chocolate and cleaning fluids..If you look at the PV there is no name on it!!!!!!! All the other documents have a name but one of them at the NFI does not!!

      Ah hah!  *******, wrong vehicle.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: ala_gunslinger on March 04, 2008, 10:23:47 PM
      Castaglance

      Had to sign back on for this.

      Your quote looks like Nut was confused, but I know it was you.

      Rob had a girlfriend that cooked a turkey on the self cleaning oven setting.  Needless to say, there wasn't much to eat.  It was an early, funny, story.

      Beef Jerkey Turkey?  ::MonkeyLaugh::

      Uh Rob...

      When we go fishin down here, we throw those back!


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: sb on March 04, 2008, 10:39:49 PM
      Am I correct that that article quoted above said that GUIDO showed up for school the next day with scratches on his face?

      WHY HAVE WE NOT HEARD THIS BEFORE>

      That is HUGE in my book, if it really is saying that. That's the kind of item that solves cases, because it puts people together doing common activities. It indicates of course that Guido was with Joran and Natalee... wherever... doing whatever... We have always wondered about what role Guido played in this, Valentine Youtube clips aside LOL.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Observer on March 04, 2008, 10:40:54 PM

      I bet you didn't know there is/was a Freddy Arends that is/was the supervisor of the San Nicolas Section of the Public Health Laboratory.  (Info courtesy of MuminOhio)

      Correct,I didn't know that. Whats Freddy doin for work nowadays anyways? Does he still have the hobby of filming underage girls and having sex with them when they are unconscious?

      There is also a Deepak and Satish Daryanani in Aruba,
      owner of the Aruba Internet Cafe. Also Web Designer of the Lions club. Similar to Kalpoes eh?

      Speaking of the Lions Den we heard it was moved to Bonaire after Natalee dissapeared..I wonder if there is a connection with Van Der Straten since he also re-located to Bonaire about the same time?


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Observer on March 04, 2008, 10:44:21 PM
      Am I correct that that article quoted above said that GUIDO showed up for school the next day with scratches on his face?

      WHY HAVE WE NOT HEARD THIS BEFORE>

      That is HUGE in my book, if it really is saying that. That's the kind of item that solves cases, because it puts people together doing common activities. It indicates of course that Guido was with Joran and Natalee... wherever... doing whatever... We have always wondered about what role Guido played in this, Valentine Youtube clips aside LOL.

      Correct that was translated from PAPI/Awemainta newspaper and we know for a fact that 5 witnesses said he had long scratches on his face when he showed up for work at the Excelsior. His lawyer Spong even mentions it when he was arrested,but adds its easy to dispute. Well when you wait over a year to arrest someone,scratches heal and judging by the job the ALE did they probably never even took there names ::MonkeyNoNo::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: ala_gunslinger on March 04, 2008, 10:46:04 PM
      Am I correct that that article quoted above said that GUIDO showed up for school the next day with scratches on his face?

      WHY HAVE WE NOT HEARD THIS BEFORE>

      That is HUGE in my book, if it really is saying that. That's the kind of item that solves cases, because it puts people together doing common activities. It indicates of course that Guido was with Joran and Natalee... wherever... doing whatever... We have always wondered about what role Guido played in this, Valentine Youtube clips aside LOL.

      You are correct.

      Wanna guess who ELSE is on joraaaan TV?


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: ala_gunslinger on March 04, 2008, 10:47:07 PM
      Am I correct that that article quoted above said that GUIDO showed up for school the next day with scratches on his face?

      WHY HAVE WE NOT HEARD THIS BEFORE>

      That is HUGE in my book, if it really is saying that. That's the kind of item that solves cases, because it puts people together doing common activities. It indicates of course that Guido was with Joran and Natalee... wherever... doing whatever... We have always wondered about what role Guido played in this, Valentine Youtube clips aside LOL.

      We have.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Anna on March 04, 2008, 10:47:19 PM
      This National Laboratory where Robert Wever, PhD, works appears to deal with public health issues.

      Could it also contain the Forensic Lab for the island?  I mean the one that determined it was canine blood on the mattress as opposed to human??

      Not saying anything, just asking. . ..

      .


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: ala_gunslinger on March 04, 2008, 10:52:10 PM
      This National Laboratory where Robert Wever, PhD, works appears to deal with public health issues.

      Could it also contain the Forensic Lab for the island?  I mean the one that determined it was canine blood on the mattress as opposed to human??

      Not saying anything, just asking. . ..

      .

      IF it actually made it that far!

      ...follow the money....


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: klaasend on March 04, 2008, 10:54:10 PM
      This National Laboratory where Robert Wever, PhD, works appears to deal with public health issues.

      Could it also contain the Forensic Lab for the island?  I mean the one that determined it was canine blood on the mattress as opposed to human??

      Not saying anything, just asking. . ..

      .

      Good thinking Anna


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: ala_gunslinger on March 04, 2008, 10:54:41 PM
      Ah right, I'm out.

      Good bye all ya'll


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Anna on March 04, 2008, 10:55:49 PM
      I don't mean just the mattress or the mattress per se.  I guess what I am asking is if this would be where testing would be conducted for any forensics not sent to NFI in The Netherlands?

      Could this be the "magic drawer" into which all the evidence disappeared all along?

      But I am sure he would have recused himself and never be involved in anything to do with a case in which his own son was a suspect, right?  I mean we know how sentitive they are to the appearance of conflict of interest and all.

      .

      .


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Observer on March 04, 2008, 11:03:55 PM
      Hmm..I wonder what a horrible thing would be to say about someone if you were German? Perhaps being related to Hitler?

      Top Places of Origin for Hugen
      Place of
      Origin   Hugen Immigrants

      Germany   35
      Ireland   9
      England   5
      Norway   4
      Bavaria   2
      Great Britain   2

      Ancestry.com


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: AZLady on March 04, 2008, 11:07:24 PM
      Think Joran joked to his friends that his mother was "Hitler's sister" when she tried to tell him to behave?


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: anidac on March 04, 2008, 11:12:41 PM
      This is very interesting reading:

      http://tinyurl.com/3xwrwp (http://tinyurl.com/3xwrwp)


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Observer on March 04, 2008, 11:19:21 PM
      Think Joran joked to his friends that his mother was "Hitler's sister" when she tried to tell him to behave?
      The possibility of Joran saying that instead of Natalee is much more likely. IMO

      I think Anita is of German descent. I realize Germany is very close to Holland and so is Belgium and other countries but I have the feeling she was raised by Germans. I may be wrong but that last name is certainly not Dutch.

      We heard Jossy say that he heard Joran is staying with a uncle in Germany..I wonder if that is Anita's brother or Paul's?


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Silverfox on March 04, 2008, 11:21:01 PM
      This National Laboratory where Robert Wever, PhD, works appears to deal with public health issues.

      Could it also contain the Forensic Lab for the island?  I mean the one that determined it was canine blood on the mattress as opposed to human??

      Not saying anything, just asking. . ..

      .

      Anna, Anna, Anna...

      Kinda sounds like you might have answered your own question... ::MonkeyCool::

      Of course it would be interesting to learn the real truth, right? 


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Silverfox on March 04, 2008, 11:24:42 PM
      I don't mean just the mattress or the mattress per se.  I guess what I am asking is if this would be where testing would be conducted for any forensics not sent to NFI in The Netherlands?

      Could this be the "magic drawer" into which all the evidence disappeared all along?

      But I am sure he would have recused himself and never be involved in anything to do with a case in which his own son was a suspect, right?  I mean we know how sentitive they are to the appearance of conflict of interest and all.

      .

      .

      But... If this is a possibility perhaps the U.S. should immediately stop the extradition process and hold him as a material witness...

      Anyone ever consider this might me a "trumped up" charge from Aruba and they just want him back because he really knows too much -- not only about Natalee but other evidence?

      I believe this should be a serious research project6 for someone...And credit Anna  ::MonkeyTongue:: if it turns out to be so (forensic lab in the National Lab)...


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Anna on March 04, 2008, 11:35:15 PM
      Silver,
      I believe Buckeye found the National Lab.  For 2.5 years, I have tried to find the forensic lab in the hospital.  Such a small place, I never think of anything as being "National" as to me everything would be so local.

      No wonder I couldn't find the hospital dept of forensics if they have an actual laboratory.

      .


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Anna on March 04, 2008, 11:37:06 PM
      And doesn't that just gum up everything even worse!!!  I mean how much more twisted could things be then we find Guido's daddy at the lab that might have been testing things.

      .


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: vms on March 04, 2008, 11:37:53 PM
      IIRC, this is Guido's father:

      R & G CORPORATE CONSULTANCY INC. N.V. 

      http://www.arubachamber.com/registry/registry_result.afp?KeyValue=13486


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Anna on March 04, 2008, 11:48:22 PM
      IIRC, this is Guido's father:

      R & G CORPORATE CONSULTANCY INC. N.V. 

      http://www.arubachamber.com/registry/registry_result.afp?KeyValue=13486

      So would this mean there are two R Wevers or could this one have two jobs?  The one above sounds like some kind of money laundering or something not quite up to a real corporation.  Like offering to be a front for other companies or something like that.  Odd and very broad reason for business, IMO.

      Could be either way.  Did anyone verify which Robert Wever was Guido's father and if they did, I wonder how they were able to do that.

      We also thought at one time that his father was political but now I wonder as there may be two Robert Wevers.  Are there at least two of every name on that island?  Except for Croes, Wevers and a few other names of which I am certain there must be a dozen with the same name.





      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Bladerunner on March 04, 2008, 11:48:38 PM
      Sounds like a monkey challenge!

       ::MonkeyHaHa::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: vms on March 04, 2008, 11:57:41 PM
      IIRC, this is Guido's father:

      R & G CORPORATE CONSULTANCY INC. N.V. 

      http://www.arubachamber.com/registry/registry_result.afp?KeyValue=13486

      So would this mean there are two R Wevers or could this one have two jobs?  The one above sounds like some kind of money laundering or something not quite up to a real corporation.  Like offering to be a front for other companies or something like that.  Odd and very broad reason for business, IMO.

      Could be either way.  Did anyone verify which Robert Wever was Guido's father and if they did, I wonder how they were able to do that.

      We also thought at one time that his father was political but now I wonder as there may be two Robert Wevers.  Are there at least two of every name on that island?  Except for Croes, Wevers and a few other names of which I am certain there must be a dozen with the same name.







      http://www.rgcorporateconsultancy.com/index.php




      (http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/Page20lista20aliansa.jpg)


      (http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/Guidosfather.jpg)


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: anidac on March 05, 2008, 12:11:12 AM
      This has most likely been posted already but I just ran across this Aruba bloggers site.  Is this "The" Gabrial we all know?  Visit his blog if you haven't been there yet. You need to scroll down some to get past the ads.


      http://www.arubabeaches.net/

      Author

      My name is Gabriel and work daily with visitors from all over the world. Due to the nature of my work I interact with visitors constantly, consequently I get asked plenty of questions and therefore have a good idea what kind of information to share with you. As a native to Aruba and a tourism and real estate professional I think I’m well qualified share some insider information with you. Occasionally I invite guest-authors to post their thoughts on several topics as well.


      RECENT BLOG ENTRY:

      United States of America on Aruba
      posted on February 29th, 2008 ·

      (http://tinyurl.com/3xucll)


      (http://tinyurl.com/3y3wqm)


      US Government Aircraft On Aruba

      Today at the airport I noticed an unusual visitor to Aruba. It is a United States government aircraft, serial number 90003. Generally these aircraft make a technical stop in Aruba, before continuing their journey down south.

      Rarely does it stay long on the island. But this aircraft is scheduled to stay in Aruba for two days, meaning a high US government or military official or delegation is on the island on business.

      I remember a case last year where United States Secretary of State, Dr. Rice was en route to Brazil and made a refueling stop on the island. This time around there is no word (not to me at least) who is visiting. Welcome, nonetheless.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Anna on March 05, 2008, 12:17:30 AM
      Does that article say what Guido's father does for a living?

      I remember that the parents of Guido wrote that public letter/statement expressing very anti-American sentiments.

      Also must have considerable finances to hire Spong for Guido.

      Along with John Merriweather, very outspoken in their disdain for America and Americans.

      .


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: klaasend on March 05, 2008, 12:17:43 AM
      This has most likely been posted already but I just ran across this Aruba bloggers site.  Is this "The" Gabrial we all know?  Visit his blog if you haven't been there yet. You need to scroll down some to get past the ads.


      http://www.arubabeaches.net/

      Author

      My name is Gabriel and work daily with visitors from all over the world. Due to the nature of my work I interact with visitors constantly, consequently I get asked plenty of questions and therefore have a good idea what kind of information to share with you. As a native to Aruba and a tourism and real estate professional I think I’m well qualified share some insider information with you. Occasionally I invite guest-authors to post their thoughts on several topics as well.


      RECENT BLOG ENTRY:

      United States of America on Aruba
      posted on February 29th, 2008 ·

      (http://tinyurl.com/3xucll)


      (http://tinyurl.com/3y3wqm)


      US Government Aircraft On Aruba

      Today at the airport I noticed an unusual visitor to Aruba. It is a United States government aircraft, serial number 90003. Generally these aircraft make a technical stop in Aruba, before continuing their journey down south.

      Rarely does it stay long on the island. But this aircraft is scheduled to stay in Aruba for two days, meaning a high US government or military official or delegation is on the island on business.

      I remember a case last year where United States Secretary of State, Dr. Rice was en route to Brazil and made a refueling stop on the island. This time around there is no word (not to me at least) who is visiting. Welcome, nonetheless.


      Nope, don't think so:

      Registrant:
         Gabe Reggie

         Registered through: GoDaddy.com, Inc. (http://www.godaddy.com)
         Domain Name: ARUBABEACHES.NET

         Domain servers in listed order:
            NS49.DOMAINCONTROL.COM
            NS50.DOMAINCONTROL.COM



      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Noly on March 05, 2008, 12:27:41 AM
      Re: Guido

      i've NEVER believed that Guido had makeup on because he was gay (according to Spong)

      he had that makeup on to try to cover those scratches, IMO


      any of you know any 'gays' that wear makeup? 


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: jackb on March 05, 2008, 12:29:20 AM
      Anyone know who Darwin Duberto is? TY

      Who is forcing you to play?
      (http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/The%20pimps/normal_Sasha_s15thB-DayPartyPart202.jpg)
      We can hate both when people turn the judicial system into a game. Simply put, it is not a game! Television and legal pundits sit on both sides and commentate as if it were a spectator sport. Attornies hire professional cheerleaders to sway public opinion in their favor. The tiny island of Aruba is no exception. The players start a bit younger and seek a little different thrill. These are the self called "Pimps" of the island. Identified from left to right back row are Giliam Van Der Straaten, Joran Van Der Sloot, Darwin Duberto?, ???, Deepak Kalpoe, Jaime Carrasquilla, ??? Valentjin Van Der Sloot.
      The Pimps are the sons of the current power side of Aruba's political spectrum. These boys has been lucky in the past. Partly due to the leniency of having fathers in positions to help them out and partly because they were seen by the general public as above suspician.
      Several of the mothers taught at the International School of Aruba (ISA) where the boys attend. ISA is a small private pre-k through high school with approximately 120 students total or 7-8 per grade level. If we really explore the situation, we might find that it is some home schooled children that are recieving grants and international aid to build a new school and for travel to foreign countries etc..


      http://arubansecrets.blogspot.com/2005/07/dont-hate-player-hate-game.html

      I thought that first dude was Koen Gottenbos, then Joran, then gillium.  Koen is on a plane with his dad, Alex and his younger brother.  He does look like a Van der Stratten more than Alex, however.  They probably don't know who their daddy is. 


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: klaasend on March 05, 2008, 12:38:38 AM
      Jackb - in case you missed it.  I believe this is correct.  That Arubansecrets site had alot of people misidentified:

      (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/normal_Sasha_s15thB-DayPartyPart202.jpg)


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Observer on March 05, 2008, 12:41:39 AM
      Re: Guido

      i've NEVER believed that Guido had makeup on because he was gay (according to Spong)

      he had that makeup on to try to cover those scratches, IMO


      any of you know any 'gays' that wear makeup? 
      I don't believe so either and judging by what we heard he not only had long scratches on his face but also his body. Would be great to hear the fricken witnesses and what they really said,as it would be interesting if they said he had long scratches and was wearing makeup also.

      Joran had a bruise on his face,which he said he got from a fight at the bar that same night or the night before. Probably another reason why they waited 10 days to arrest him as it gave him time for the bruise to heal from around his eye. We know it was at the minimum a teacher and a student who reported that. Wouldn't suprise me if Guido his love buddy shared concealer with him.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Noly on March 05, 2008, 12:51:02 AM
      do we know for sure that he is even gay?

      i always thought that's something Spong threw out there, because Guido was wearing makeup



      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: jackb on March 05, 2008, 12:53:21 AM
      He spent a lot of time around her pubic area, including really studying her panties to have been on the beach and then to have her start shaking and having seizures, and the moon had to be exceptionally bright.

      I doubt that there was a bright moon. Joran said somewhere that there were no stars maybe it was clouded. Also in one of satishe's PV's they asked him about the light level in the car and about weather conditions.

      from june 30

      On your question of when Deepak, Joran and I were with Natalee on, May 30, 2005, in the nighttime hours, wasn’t it too dark in the car for Joran to see the color of the missing girl’s panties, I can only answer this:
      There was enough light in the car of Deepak. Joran must have taken off the clothing of the girl so that he could see the color of the panties she wore.

      from june 3

      On your question of what it was like on Monday, May 30, 2005, in the nighttime hours, when Deepak and I dropped off Joran and the missing American girl north of the Marriott, I can answer you the following:
      I cannot you say what it was like because I sat in my brother Deepak’s car.  I also didn’t look up to see if there were clouds.

      This is another of those areas of too much information, and as personal as it is, everyone knows it.  must have put it on the news, possible made an emergency broadcasting.  There are too many people who know this and too much detail about it, I'm surprised no one checked the tag for her size.

      Do you mean to tell me, there was a girl in the back seat of the car with no underwear on, and everyone was memorizing her panties, they didn't gawk at her naked body?  You'll never sell me on that.  The underwear is part of a much more sinister story, imo.

      Anita may have seen them first hand.  She TCB in that household.                                                                   I am not so sure Joran would protect his dad to that extent.  Of course they are all protecting themselves and their lifestyles.     jack blue


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Observer on March 05, 2008, 12:59:48 AM
      do we know for sure that he is even gay?

      i always thought that's something Spong threw out there, because Guido was wearing makeup



      No we don't..We know Spong claims that he's gay and therefore can't be involved in Natalee's dissapearance and because he's gay he can't be extradited to prison either because of the treatment gay people receive in prison. Jaime says he talks funny like a homosexual in the PV,But in Joran's book he claims Marco(Guido)had girlfriends.

      His friend in his hyve picture sure looks gay though as well as his other friends on his list ::MonkeyWink::


      http://wever2.hyves.nl/photos/19453304/0/8kQV/
      (http://img155.imageshack.us/img155/3852/guidoal2.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Noly on March 05, 2008, 01:09:00 AM
      do we know for sure that he is even gay?

      i always thought that's something Spong threw out there, because Guido was wearing makeup



      No we don't..We know Spong claims that he's gay and therefore can't be involved in Natalee's dissapearance and because he's gay he can't be extradited to prison either because of the treatment gay people receive in prison. Jaime says he talks funny like a homosexual in the PV,But in Joran's book he claims Marco(Guido)had girlfriends.

      His friend in his hyve picture sure looks gay though as well as his other friends on his list ::MonkeyWink::


      http://wever2.hyves.nl/photos/19453304/0/8kQV/
      (http://img155.imageshack.us/img155/3852/guidoal2.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)

       ::MonkeyHaHa::  why yes!!  he does!  thanks *******!


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: jackb on March 05, 2008, 01:18:55 AM
      <snip> He also said he told the police and they sent him on a 4 wheeler to try and find, locate the spot and he had been threatened by these people. This person has been seen on the beach everyday has no longer been seen after this and was known to be there daily.


      van cromvoirt?

      rOB,  CAN YOU REMIND ME WHO van cromvoirt IS?

      Geoffrey van Cromvoirt. His father owned VCB secruity and he was a former Visibility team member. I believe he was fired from the VT.

      He was arrested in March of 06 if I remember correctly. Went to jail with his blankey and pillows. Was released when he said nothing.

      Thank you.  I remember him now.  Please forgive my recent typos.  I was juggling the little ones. 


      Joran = Arrested 6-9-05, released 9-3-05 by Judge R Smid , under “reasonable suspicion of murder, manslaughter or intentional containment with the dead as consequence”

      Deepak = Arrested 6-9-05, released 7-4-05, under “reasonable suspicion of murder, manslaughter or intentional containment with the dead as consequence” Re-arrested on 8-26-05 under suspicion of the primary criminal act of committing premeditated murder, alternately together with other people murdering somebody, more alternately, rob a person of her liberty with fatal consequences, and even more alternately, raping somebody

      Satish = Arrested 6-9-05 along with his brother Deepak, & Joran. Seemingly unemployed 18 year old citizen of Suriname under “reasonable suspicion of murder, manslaughter or intentional containment with the dead as consequence.”

      Paulus = Arrested 6-23-2005 around 2:15 pm, released 6-26-05. Suspicion of complicity to premeditated murder, complicity to murder and complicity to kidnapping

      GVC ROMVOIRT, Geoffry van - 19 years old, resident of Aruba, who was detained by ALE on 4-15-2006 in an unannounced connection to the Natalee Holloway case. He is the son of the owner of an island security company that supplies equipment and personnel to beach patrol and hotels. For more information see Who’s Who - Victim, Suspects, Witnesses & Families.

      Guido = Arrested on 5-20-06, released on 5-23-06, under suspicion of accessory to murder, kidnapping and heavy battery.




      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: jackb on March 05, 2008, 01:24:38 AM
      <snip> He also said he told the police and they sent him on a 4 wheeler to try and find, locate the spot and he had been threatened by these people. This person has been seen on the beach everyday has no longer been seen after this and was known to be there daily.


      van cromvoirt?

      rOB,  CAN YOU REMIND ME WHO van cromvoirt IS?

      Geoffrey van Cromvoirt. His father owned VCB secruity and he was a former Visibility team member. I believe he was fired from the VT.

      He was arrested in March of 06 if I remember correctly. Went to jail with his blankey and pillows. Was released when he said nothing.

      Thank you.  I remember him now.  Please forgive my recent typos.  I was juggling the little ones. 

      Amigoe; April 21, 2006: ‘The families Van Cromvoirt and Van der Sloot not friends’

          ARUBA — “The Van Cromvoirt family dissociate herself expressly from all the statements that associate Geoffrey van Cromvoirt to the disappearance of Natalee Holloway”, stated Eline Lotter Homan, lawyer of family Van Cromvoirt in a written press release. “Due to persistent speculations, it is advisable to rectify the many completely untrue propositions put forward”, was her reaction on the many questions she gets from the different media.

          Lotter Homan says that it is impossible to react on all possible propositions that are going around. She also didn’t want to react as regards content on the current judicial preliminary investigation. She states furthermore in her press release that “the facts that are being described in this are not meant for a restrictive refutation.”

          In May and June of last year, Van Cromvoirt hadn’t worked for the Visibility Team or VCB Video Camera Security Systems & Consultancy. The lawyer confirmed that the family Van Cromvoirt had not at all been interrogated in connection with the investigation on the disappearance of the American girl. Rumors about Joran van der Sloot and Van Cromvoirt being friends are heavily denied. “Geoffrey is not a friend of any of the earlier arrested persons in the disappearance of Natalee Holloway and has also no other relationship with any of them.”

      I personally believe  GVC did the final to make sure of her not witnessing against them with a bullet.    blue


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: jackb on March 05, 2008, 01:31:07 AM
      Suspect multi-million fraud at National Lab arrested

      ORANJESTAD – Upon request of the Aruban Public Prosecutor (OM), the American authorities have arrested a 53-year old man, who is suspected of embezzling 5 million florins at the National Lab, where he used to work.  The arrest took place in Miami last Saturday.

      The National Lab reported a large-scale fraud late last year.  However, the former employee M.M.F. has already fled to Colombia at that time.  The OM issued an international warrant for the suspect’s arrest, and with success.  The American authorities tipped the OM when the suspect traveled to the US last Thursday.  “We issued a request for provisional arrest, which took place on Saturday”, said chief district attorney Hans Mos, who is very pleased with the good cooperation with the American authorities.

      F. is suspected of embezzlement, forgery, fraud, and money laundering.  He was placing orders with non-existing suppliers in the US.  The media reported embezzlement of 10 million florins, but according to Mos, the amount is 5 million florins in five-year time.  F. was brought up in Florida today, whereby Aruba has submitted a request for his extradition.  If the suspect agrees with the extradition request, he will be sent to Aruba in two weeks.

      http://www.amigoe.com/english/

      Don't know about The National Lab, but Guido's dad is a biggy in a lab.  He had been giving lectures.

      So does that mean Guids's old man could have done the XTC/DNA testing to make sure it didn't match?   Just wondering.    jack blue


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Anna on March 05, 2008, 01:35:00 AM
      Not sure how much bearing this will have on Aruba but the International Criminal Court in the Hague is apparently going to be asked to try Hugo on charges of financing genocide.

      Colombia to bring genocide charges against Chavez
      http://www.mercopress.com/vernoticia.do?id=12803&formato=HTML

      And Oduber did call Chavez Aruba's "other friend" on whom he might have to depend in the event of loss of American tourism.



      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Observer on March 05, 2008, 01:37:30 AM
      (http://img145.imageshack.us/img145/315/guido1eo4.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)


      Actually his friend Michael has Guido in a few videos with him and they look really Gay..Hard to see because it's from a camera phone(Guido in black).. ::MonkeyShocked::

      http://tinyurl.com/2kuyyy
      http://tinyurl.com/yrc7jl
      http://giggity79.hyves.nl/



      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: jackb on March 05, 2008, 01:44:26 AM
      Rob

      If you are back with that "self cleaning" turkey girl, please order the precooked meal.

      Nut

      Thanks for all the links.  Long day today and it was nice to have the search done.  We seem to frequent the same sites. LOL

      Ono


      I remember the dump being emptied into ocean, the same as you described, but can't find info now.  Here is a link to interesting landfill info:

      http://scaredmonkeys.com/2005/07/28/background-information-on-arubas-landfill/#more-1335



      I seem to recall a comment, I think by Jossy, about blood trace in a Sloot vehicle.  Does anyone remember that? TIA


      Thanks Buckeye!    ::MonkeyCool::

      We know they cut squares out of one of those cars on the seat and headliner. We also saw the Aruban Newspaper article that blood was found in one of the sloot vehicles. Not sure if the article was a typo or not.
      The "Diario," a local daily newspaper, is reporting that a human blood sample found in a car at the residence of one of the teens in custody — the 17-year-old son of a high-ranking island judicuary official — is now being sent to the U.S. and will be tested for a possible match to Natalee, whose mother gave a blood sample to investigators.

      http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,159252,00.html


      and so the cover-up began!!!



      Sloots car had a hunk cut out of the steering wheel.  New looking cut out. So that was another "coincidence."  to rack up.     j/b


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: jackb on March 05, 2008, 01:50:33 AM
      This National Laboratory where Robert Wever, PhD, works appears to deal with public health issues.

      Could it also contain the Forensic Lab for the island?  I mean the one that determined it was canine blood on the mattress as opposed to human??

      Not saying anything, just asking. . ..

      .

      IF it actually made it that far!

      ...follow the money....

      Wonder what else he was cooking in that lab?  They all need to be exposed.  j/b


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: jackb on March 05, 2008, 02:01:00 AM
      do we know for sure that he is even gay?

      i always thought that's something Spong threw out there, because Guido was wearing makeup


        His parents supposed to have said this.  He has that "gay" look about him.  If you want to send him a valentine, you might find out for sure  LOL  Jack.  PS:  Don't go to spouting off and asking what that "gay" look is because if you don't know, then there is no use for me to explain it.



      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Observer on March 05, 2008, 02:04:40 AM
      Suspect multi-million fraud at National Lab arrested

      Don't know about The National Lab, but Guido's dad is a biggy in a lab.  He had been giving lectures.

      So does that mean Guids's old man could have done the XTC/DNA testing to make sure it didn't match?   Just wondering.    jack blue

      That would depend if he also has a PHD and is the same Robert Wever that worked in National Lab. All we know for sure is he is a politician. Whoever did the testing on the bloody mattress did it in 3 hours and announced it in the same press conference as when they were framing the two innocent security guards.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Observer on March 05, 2008, 02:11:42 AM
      I think there are two Robert Wever's on the island. The one with the PHD is not Guido's Father. Unless he is a doctor and a lawyer..lol

      R&G - Corporate Consultancy Inc. N.V.

      Owner & Managing Director:
      Robert F. Wever, LL.M.
      Corporate Lawyer & Former (Development) Banker


      Real Estate & Property Management     
      R&Gcc provides real estate services e.g rental, sale & purchase of houses, commercial buildings, time share weeks, property management. Also seek finance for investment in real estate.

      R&G Corporate Consultancy Inc. N.V.
      P.O. Box 1160
      Oranjestad, Aruba

      Telephone: +297 5826512
      Fax:            +297 5826512

      http://www.rgcorporateconsultancy.com/


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Jo-An on March 05, 2008, 02:29:23 AM
      Corruption can't be wiped out from higher-up

      Today in Dutch newspaper "De Pers" (the Press) there is an interview with Hans de Doelder, professor criminal law in Rotterdam and he's revising the penal code in the Antilles and he is a replacement judge over there.
      He is criticizing Hero Brinkman for judging the corruption-situation in the Antilles, because Brinkman has never even been over there.

      Main points that de Doelder is talking about:
      -of course there's corruption in the Antilles, like there is everywhere
      -corruption is less wide spread than for instance Italy, Dominican Republic and Haiti
      -politicians in the Antilles are "nice" to people who vote for them
      -because of all the nepotism "bad" and unqualified people end up having the wrong jobs (o really???   ::MonkeyRoll::)
      -he notices that Antillian papers are becoming more and more critical of the crooked job appointments
      -Antillians who feel disadvantaged by all the political job appointments are speaking out more now. That's a sign, says de Doelder, that people want get rid of the nepotism and corruption

      The whole piece can be found here:
      http://www.depers.nl/binnenland/178733/Corruptie-niet-van-boven-uit-te-roeien.html


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Observer on March 05, 2008, 02:38:09 AM
      What I think about Joran van der sloot (From a Dutchie)

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oLpRl-OuAsY&feature=related


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Observer on March 05, 2008, 02:44:59 AM
      Hmm..This picture and article says Hero Brinkman was in Curacao and Aruba in January  ::MonkeyWink::

      Fellow Monkeys!

      This Dutch Member of Parliament may help!
      His name: Hero Brinkman

      You can contact him via this link:

      http://www.pvv.nl/index.php?option=com_facileforms&Itemid=114

      He went on a important parlemantairy working visit to the Antilles and Aruba in january.
      But the working visit got aborted because he wouldn't take back his remarks he made about the islands.
      He called the Antilles and Aruba "a corrupt gangsters' nest".
      Because that visit got aborted the current visit of prime-minister Balkenende is somewhat of a joke because nothing can get done.

      Jan van der Straten is police chief on Bonaire now apparently.
      He treathened to arrest him if he would say nasty things about the island.

      Quote

      Police chief wants to arrest PVV-MP

      AMSTERDAM - The politie chief of Bonaire wanted PVV-member of parliament Brinkman to have arrested if he would say unpleasant things about the Antilles on the island. "Brinkman is not impeded by knowledge of the Antilles, this man knows nothing about the Antilles," police chief Jan van der Straten said to the newspaper Amigoe. "If he made his comments on Bonaire, I would have a least attempted to arrest him for slandering the population", says police chief Van der Straten in the newspaper.

      http://www.telegraaf.nl/binnenland/3010706/_Politiechef_wilde_PVVer_arresteren__.html?pageNumber=3
      Quote

      (http://xs224.xs.to/xs224/08074/herobrinkman_jpg_146644i724.jpg)
      PVV-MP Hero Brinkman is protected by two bodyguards at arrival on Curaçao

      Political consultation Antilles can not continue

      WILLEMSTAD - The parliamentary consultation Kingdom relations (POK) on Curaçao does not continue in its whole, after PVV-member of parliament Hero Brinkman has been denied the access to the states. As long as Brinkman has offered no excuses for its description of the Netherlands Antilles and Aruba as a "corrupt gangster' nest", the Antillian police force had the authorisation to remove the politician if needed from the building

      http://www.telegraaf.nl/binnenland/2970152/_Politiek_overleg_Antillen_afgelast__.html

      He never took his comments back.
      Last year he said he wanted to sell the islands on e-bay.
      This also caused outrage by other MP's.
      On his webpage on the right it says "The Antilles out of the Kingdom".
      It is really his issue this corruption problem.

      You can contact him via this link:

      http://www.pvv.nl/index.php?option=com_facileforms&Itemid=114

      I think the Dutch are for a large part responsible for the mess by sending incompetent prosecutors, judges to the islands.
      They used the island for the scum of the Dutch officials, like Karin Janssen.
      To prevent a scandal in The Netherlands they got send over there.

      Really, if all Dutchies knew what you guys have been doing the last few years I am sure things start moving forward.

      Like Peter R. de Vries said: 'case solved'.
      Now it is time for the next chapter in my opinion.

      To uncover the cover-up.

      I doubt ALE is going to do this by themselves.


      Of course I am e-mailing him to explain as good as I can what's going on.
      But maybe some if you are better at that.

      You can contact him via this link:

      http://www.pvv.nl/index.php?option=com_facileforms&Itemid=114


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: jackb on March 05, 2008, 03:02:06 AM
      Re: Guido

      i've NEVER believed that Guido had makeup on because he was gay (according to Spong)

      he had that makeup on to try to cover those scratches, IMO


      any of you know any 'gays' that wear makeup? 

      Koen, Joran, and Guido supposed to have had marks on them.  Who knows they waited for everyone to heal before arresting them.   Also I have the picture of Koen on a plane with his dad and younger brother if anyone wants to see it.  I may have sent it to Klass, I meant to.  Anyway she has the one where Koen is dressed a bit ladylike.   jack b


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Jo-An on March 05, 2008, 03:05:17 AM
      Hmm..This picture and article says Hero Brinkman was in Curacao and Aruba in January  ::MonkeyWink::

      I think de Doelder was talking more about Brinkman not knowing the situation over there.
      And Brinkman's visit was aborted so technically he wás on the island but the visit was then aborted.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: jackb on March 05, 2008, 03:12:52 AM
      IIRC, this is Guido's father:

      R & G CORPORATE CONSULTANCY INC. N.V. 

      http://www.arubachamber.com/registry/registry_result.afp?KeyValue=13486

      So would this mean there are two R Wevers or could this one have two jobs?  The one above sounds like some kind of money laundering or something not quite up to a real corporation.  Like offering to be a front for other companies or something like that.  Odd and very broad reason for business, IMO.

      Could be either way.  Did anyone verify which Robert Wever was Guido's father and if they did, I wonder how they were able to do that.

      We also thought at one time that his father was political but now I wonder as there may be two Robert Wevers.  Are there at least two of every name on that island?  Except for Croes, Wevers and a few other names of which I am certain there must be a dozen with the same name.




      [



      http://www.rgcorporateconsultancy.com/index.php




      (http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/Page20lista20aliansa.jpg)


      (http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/Guidosfather.jpg)

      I am sure all those people double dip and do more than one job.  Down there "conflict of interest" does not seem to matter all that much.  He could be in politics and be the chief honcho at a lab, give lectures, and even make X-tacy, meth, and process the horse.  Of course he may not too.
      Just seem like a bunch working hard to get out of working honestly.
              jack b


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: jackb on March 05, 2008, 03:24:07 AM

      I bet you didn't know there is/was a Freddy Arends that is/was the supervisor of the San Nicolas Section of the Public Health Laboratory.  (Info courtesy of MuminOhio)

      Correct,I didn't know that. Whats Freddy doin for work nowadays anyways? Does he still have the hobby of filming underage girls and having sex with them when they are unconscious?

      There is also a Deepak and Satish Daryanani in Aruba,
      owner of the Aruba Internet Cafe. Also Web Designer of the Lions club. Similar to Kalpoes eh?

      Speaking of the Lions Den we heard it was moved to Bonaire after Natalee dissapeared..I wonder if there is a connection with Van Der Straten since he also re-located to Bonaire about the same time?

      Steve Croes dad bought the computer place where Depak Kalpoe worked the following August after that May is what I heard and Steve Croes went to work in there.  I really do not know.  Just may be scuttlebutt.  Guess he wanted a job after the Tattoo let him go.  That is one way to get one.  I wonder if Depak still works there?   j/b


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: mojo on March 05, 2008, 03:48:35 AM
      "the phone outside the marriott can only be used to make international calls" 
      What a memory he has. Why would he know that and remember it and use it as a defense ? Is there only one phone booth outside the Marriott ? Or in the vicinity ? Maybe he called his Mumma ...  she was in the NL

      or his dad if he had a dutch cell phone. my husband has several sim cards and phones that he uses when travelling. so even if it is for international calls only, he could have called daddy-o.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: jackb on March 05, 2008, 03:50:00 AM

      I bet you didn't know there is/was a Freddy Arends that is/was the supervisor of the San Nicolas Section of the Public Health Laboratory.  (Info courtesy of MuminOhio)

      Correct,I didn't know that. Whats Freddy doin for work nowadays anyways? Does he still have the hobby of filming underage girls and having sex with them when they are unconscious?

      There is also a Deepak and Satish Daryanani in Aruba,
      owner of the Aruba Internet Cafe. Also Web Designer of the Lions club. Similar to Kalpoes eh?

      Speaking of the Lions Den we heard it was moved to Bonaire after Natalee dissapeared..I wonder if there is a connection with Van Der Straten since he also re-located to Bonaire about the same time?

      I believe Jan Vanderstratten is as bad or worse than Palus Vandersloot.  Who is he to say he would arrest someone for "slandering" the population when he is about as criminal as anyone could get in more ways than one.  He needs to be behind bars with someone like Matthews.  That piece of gargbage thinks he is a dicataor over a whole country.  THERE IS NO GREATER EVIL IN THE LAND THAN INJUSTICE STANDING BEHIND THE BADGE OF THE LAW (a quote of Thurgood Marshall, I believe)  Jack


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: mojo on March 05, 2008, 03:54:36 AM
      "the phone outside the marriott can only be used to make international calls" 
      What a memory he has. Why would he know that and remember it and use it as a defense ? Is there only one phone booth outside the Marriott ? Or in the vicinity ? Maybe he called his Mumma ...  she was in the NL

      My point exactly why the calculated response in the P&W show, why throw in daury unless at somepoint he knew that info would be checked and would probably clear him. He volunteered the information about daury without thinking twice.whereas in the days before he swore to take it to his grave.

      didn't peter say that after he had shown the tapes to mos that mos had said they needed more. (think this came out last week?) so that was when they went for the final "ride" with patrick and when daury's name came into play?

      it would be very interesting to see how the dates and info came out. i think joran did figure something was up. there were five rides with taped info regarding what happened with natalee. the question is at what point he became suspicious. personally, i think he's a bit dim, arrogant but dim and that he wouldn't have figured it out til perhaps after the third or even as late as the fourth, but the fifth....well, that may be where he inserted details to cover himself.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: mojo on March 05, 2008, 03:57:52 AM
      I believe Jan Vanderstratten is as bad or worse than Palus Vandersloot.  Who is he to say he would arrest someone for "slandering" the population when he is about as criminal as anyone could get in more ways than one.  He needs to be behind bars with someone like Matthews.  That piece of gargbage thinks he is a dicataor over a whole country.  THERE IS NO GREATER EVIL IN THE LAND THAN INJUSTICE STANDING BEHIND THE BADGE OF THE LAW (a quote of Thurgood Marshall, I believe)  Jack

      i would like to think that mos has been sitting on both jacobs and van der stratten after devries and beth and jug's info about the seizure questions....seems to me, this whole thing needs to go straight back to the beginning of this so-called investigation and it starts with those two. 


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Peaches on March 05, 2008, 04:10:48 AM
      Re: Guido

      i've NEVER believed that Guido had makeup on because he was gay (according to Spong)

      he had that makeup on to try to cover those scratches, IMO


      any of you know any 'gays' that wear makeup? 

      yes


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Peaches on March 05, 2008, 04:25:24 AM
      "the phone outside the marriott can only be used to make international calls" 
      What a memory he has. Why would he know that and remember it and use it as a defense ? Is there only one phone booth outside the Marriott ? Or in the vicinity ? Maybe he called his Mumma ...  she was in the NL

      or his dad if he had a dutch cell phone. my husband has several sim cards and phones that he uses when travelling. so even if it is for international calls only, he could have called daddy-o.

      Nice catch.  I would not have thought of that as my experience with sim cards is limited to the one I have in my one phone.   I could see if one traveled internationally or even in the continental US that more than one cell phone might come in handy. 


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Observer on March 05, 2008, 04:30:51 AM
      Search crew continues to hold out hope

      Sometimes, it is just time to ask for help. Those of us who have devoted the past "almost" three years to finding and returning Natalee Holloway to American soil have reached that time. We need you. We need your help, your hope, your prayers... and yes... we need you to make a donation to allow us to finish the search and bring Natalee home.

      Natalee Holloway, a then-recent American High School graduate, traveled to Aruba to celebrate what should have been a wonderful milestone on her way to a fulfilling education and eventual career in medicine. The night before she should have returned home, she instead, disappeared off the face of the earth. Natalee was last seen with an island resident named Joran Van der Sloot who said he didn't know what happened to her. He has since made the horrific admission that he dumped Natalee's seemingly-lifeless body into the cold ocean depths offshore from the beach where he'd taken her.

      Kemah businessman, Louis Schafer, has personally spent in excess of a million dollars over the last four months funding a sophisticated, deep sea survey boat, named the Persistence. This aptly named ship, and her wonderful crew, have surveyed the entire 50-square miles area off Aruba. Schafer says, "We have identified at least 60 of the targets. We have about 150 more targets to inspect." Any one of those remaining 150 "targets" could be the remains of our missing American teenager. He went on to say, "We have completely mapped the ocean floor, we know every object that's there, we know every object that could be a container holding her in the sea."

      Unfortunately, right now... with the recovery of Natalee within our grasp, the money has run out.

      With just 150 objects remaining to be inspected, we are at the brink of finding Natalee or... incredible as it sounds to our hearts... abandoning the effort, coming home empty-handed... and never knowing, never knowing... did we have her right there amongst those targets. Tragically too... not finding Natalee and whatever evidence may be submerged with her... will almost certainly allow the perpetrator of this terrible crime to forever escape the justice deserved.

      Texas Equusearch is the non-profit organization. Words can't express how desperately we hope they will hear from you. They can be contacted at: 281-309-9500 (www.texasequusearch.org)

      We need you. Can you help?

      http://www.meridianstar.com/opinion/local_story_062005533.html


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: JE on March 05, 2008, 06:18:25 AM
      Re: Guido

      i've NEVER believed that Guido had makeup on because he was gay (according to Spong)

      he had that makeup on to try to cover those scratches, IMO


      any of you know any 'gays' that wear makeup? 

      Koen, Joran, and Guido supposed to have had marks on them.  Who knows they waited for everyone to heal before arresting them.   Also I have the picture of Koen on a plane with his dad and younger brother if anyone wants to see it.  I may have sent it to Klass, I meant to.  Anyway she has the one where Koen is dressed a bit ladylike.   jack b

      If spong claimed that guido was gay it may be true. Spong being a homosexual himself should be able to tell


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Bearlyhere on March 05, 2008, 06:37:34 AM
      Think Joran joked to his friends that his mother was "Hitler's sister" when she tried to tell him to behave?
      The possibility of Joran saying that instead of Natalee is much more likely. IMO

      I think Anita is of German descent. I realize Germany is very close to Holland and so is Belgium and other countries but I have the feeling she was raised by Germans. I may be wrong but that last name is certainly not Dutch.

      We heard Jossy say that he heard Joran is staying with a uncle in Germany..I wonder if that is Anita's brother or Paul's?

      I agree with you that that statement seems out of character.  It in the very least was taken out of context.  So many of the things that happened in the car seem off to me.  I have not seen one tad of evidence to support Natalee's being a bigot or a loose woman.

      Another thing that seems out of character to me is that Natalee was dancing suggestively that last night on Aruba.  I can't see this happening.  During this whole thing I have watched literally hours of this lovely girl dancing.  That is what she loved.  As I watch her dance, it seems to me that she is naive in her movements, not in the furthest stretch of my imagination does it seem that she has the movements of a provocative dancer.  Even if I compare her to others in the group, none of which seem out of line, I can't see anything in her movements that are sexually suggestive or set off an alarm that I could be watching a person who has been sexually abused.

      One of the things that attracts me to this family and this case is Natalee herself.  She is everything you could want in a daughter and more.  Beth has been so kind in letting us get to know and love Natalee for who she was and what she was like and believed in.  It seems rather cliche to say she is everyone's daughter but I can understand that statement.

      The statement is made because she is the type of person that results from a kind loving home.  Both her parents and her stepparents love her.  Dave has not left the picture as have many children's fathers, who have divorced their mothers.  If there was a how-to manual written, these people would be found between the pages.  I am in no way insinuating that they are perfect, please don't take that away from reading this.

      She had good grades, good friends, good health--mentally, physically, and emotionally.  She had a scholarship to college, was persuing a worthwhile profession/career, and was close to her parents.  She had outside interests she enjoyed and was a valuable asset to our society.  I grieve not only for the person she was, the people that are her parents, friends, and family, but also for the world that is worse off for having lost her.  Society is the big loser here and the evil that has taken her away, still remains free in this world.

      It has been both a curse and a privilege to watch this case unfold.  A curse because I have never seen such hostility, jealousy, meanness, and discrimination against a girl, her family, and her supporters.  I cannot see the reason for it.  I have witnessed a number of people, hopefully small, reacting to the demise of her character with  glee, unwarranted animosity and hatred.  I cannot imagine how these same people would act towards the family, friends, and advocates of someone who is missing/deceased with even a slightly different character, who through no fault of their own, had been the victim of a heinous crime.

      A privilege because I am a member of Scared Monkeys, the product of very giving men and their families.  Their families have given up plenty of time with these men and I appreciate it as do so many others.  They have given us a place to keep this and many other cases active, find out all the latest information, and wade through the misinformation out there.  They have enabled us to find friends, commiserate about the case, share in the joys and grief of each other's lives, etc.  We have also learned about heroes like Tim Miller and his organization,  We have learned the true meaning of Persistence and that it is not just word in the dictionary.  We have seen the magic of Klaas Paws and other monkeys amazingly appear before our eyes.  We receive answers, sometimes almost before the questions or thoughts are out of our mouses.  There is way too much to put in this category, including the bravery and werewithall of Natalee's family, friends, and our fellow monkeys.

      I do not have a daughter.  Natalee is the daughter any Mom would be proud to have.  Not only as an offspring, but as a friend as she continues to mature.  Her family was robbed of the fruits of their labor and love.  They will never see her college and med school graduations.  They will never witness her steady relationship that results in marriage, children, and all the perks that go with that.

      That is what attracts me to her case, not her physical attributes, but her personhood.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Bearlyhere on March 05, 2008, 06:47:12 AM
      I don't mean just the mattress or the mattress per se.  I guess what I am asking is if this would be where testing would be conducted for any forensics not sent to NFI in The Netherlands?

      Could this be the "magic drawer" into which all the evidence disappeared all along?

      But I am sure he would have recused himself and never be involved in anything to do with a case in which his own son was a suspect, right?  I mean we know how sentitive they are to the appearance of conflict of interest and all.

      .

      .

      I thought about this too, Anna.  If not that, he could instruct on how to destroy/taint the evidence at hand before it got to the real lab.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: BettyLynn on March 05, 2008, 07:09:43 AM
      Aruba phone book

      http://www.numberway.com/phone-numbers/53/

      Sorry, I don't know how to link.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Rob on March 05, 2008, 07:19:16 AM
      Bearlyhere said ~
      Quote
      During this whole thing I have watched literally hours of this lovely girl dancing.  That is what she loved.  As I watch her dance, it seems to me that she is naive in her movements, not in the furthest stretch of my imagination does it seem that she has the movements of a provocative dancer.

      Chris Cuomo ~ "What kind of girl was Natalee?"

      Beth ~ "she was a dancer Chris."


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Rob on March 05, 2008, 07:21:51 AM
      Good Morning All,



      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Bearlyhere on March 05, 2008, 07:37:11 AM
      Am I correct that that article quoted above said that GUIDO showed up for school the next day with scratches on his face?

      WHY HAVE WE NOT HEARD THIS BEFORE>

      That is HUGE in my book, if it really is saying that. That's the kind of item that solves cases, because it puts people together doing common activities. It indicates of course that Guido was with Joran and Natalee... wherever... doing whatever... We have always wondered about what role Guido played in this, Valentine Youtube clips aside LOL.

      SB

      I also found this:
      http://scaredmonkeys.com/2006/05/21/guido-weaver-name-of-new-arrested-suspect-in-natalee-holloway-case-in-aruba/

      ...Jossy says he will have to come back to Aruba and the case will go forward in court. Guido Wever is his name. He did not have scratches or bruises on him last June. He was interrogated last June. Good friend of Joran. Played Tennis with him and gambles with Joran. Jossy believes Guido is in bigger trouble than GVC ever was. GVC never knew Joran.



      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: caesu on March 05, 2008, 08:06:35 AM
      Beth Holloway at Robert Jensen last night:

      link opens in windows media player (http://www.rtl.nl/(channel=rtl5,progid=jensen,zone=rtlgemist.rtl.nl/jensen,vm=/shows/jensen/home/,ord=1204721993449)/system/video/wvx/components/shows/jensen/miMedia/2008/week10/di_beth_holloway_4mrt.avi_plain.xml/796.wvx)

      link also here:
      http://www.rtl.nl/shows/jensen/home/index.xml

      tonight Patrick, Peter R. de Vries, Beth Holloway (and Bram Moszkowicz?).

      also a phonecall to Joran.

      (http://www.rtl.nl/shows/jensen/components/images/jensen-patrick.jpg)

      Bram Moszkowicz also tonight at Pauw/Witteman.
      http://pauwenwitteman.vara.nl/uitzending.php?id=318


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Bearlyhere on March 05, 2008, 08:18:40 AM
      Does that article say what Guido's father does for a living?

      I remember that the parents of Guido wrote that public letter/statement expressing very anti-American sentiments.

      Also must have considerable finances to hire Spong for Guido.

      Along with John Merriweather, very outspoken in their disdain for America and Americans.

      .

      Hi Anna:

      I have been trying to find this for you.  I am still looking.  One thing I have found is that Guido's dad's middle initial is F,  The other thing, the Wever from the lab would be Dr. Wever and I have not seen his dad called that anywhere (Robert Wever, Ph.D). 


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Rob on March 05, 2008, 08:23:34 AM
      Hi caesu, hey is the phone call to Joran pre-recorded or will it happen live?

      I hope he keeps on talkin'.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: caesu on March 05, 2008, 08:27:27 AM
      Hi caesu, hey is the phone call to Joran pre-recorded or will it happen live?

      I hope he keeps on talkin'.

      pre-recorded. they showed him answering the phone yesterday.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: BUCKSHOT on March 05, 2008, 08:29:14 AM
      Jossy is also on video saying that the two witnesses describe details about a white pu and other things that match up but its even more credible because they have no connection to each other.

      How many people is that now that talked of a white PU that night or 3 days later? 1.Junior who claims he saw a burial 3 days later at the landfill.2.Francisco who says he helped bury a lady the night NH vanished.3 Barbeshe witness4.Tourist wintness.5.Report of a screaming lady and a white PU

      Listen to the end of this clip (Dave talking about the Landfill witness)

      http://tinyurl.com/2bnqyq

      (2) Francisco - Who/Where is this person? Have they been interviewed/arrested?
      (3) ??? What did this person witness?
      (4) ??? What did this person witness?


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Rob on March 05, 2008, 08:31:41 AM
      Hi caesu, hey is the phone call to Joran pre-recorded or will it happen live?

      I hope he keeps on talkin'.

      pre-recorded. they showed him answering the phone yesterday.

      so, he does answer and take some questions?


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Tater on March 05, 2008, 08:33:42 AM

      The question then becomes what happened to her body when it was removed from the landfill?

      I say she was then put in the trap and carried by helicopter out 40 miles past the continental shelf under the cover of darkness and dropped....My second theory,one of the deep sea fishing charters did Paulas the pervie a favor....High winds knocked out my cable today and it just now came back on.....

      If a helicopter was used she will never be found. We know the evil one has plenty of Helicopters at his disposal.

      (http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/observer0000007/rudyagain.jpg)

      (http://img521.imageshack.us/img521/240/0725kustwachtqz1.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)

      *******,
         Exactly!!!! This was their intention from the very beginning,was it not?Thankyou for the pictures..After I read about the helicopter following Dave around the island,it just makes perfect sense to me that this could be done in a very small amount of time.Flying 40 miles out would take a very short amount of time and the job would simply be done and over.It just makes no sense they would put her in shallower water where she would be found...Deep sea fishing charters also go way out into very deep waters..Just food for thought here..As for me,I'm really leaning towards the helicopter theory,especially now that you posted those pictures.Too easy and the one to do it had perfect oppertunity...Good morning monkey's by the way..


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: BUCKSHOT on March 05, 2008, 08:33:49 AM
      Junior provided a tag (license) number to Aruban authorities and ... two months later ... he provided the same tag number to the Twittys.

      Who was that tag number registered to?

      Janet

      +++++++++++

      Susan Candiotti - Cnn Correspondent
      NANCY GRACE
      July 29, 2005

       
      CANDIOTTI: Well, according to sources familiar with the investigation, at least one witness has come forward who claims to have seen more than one person dumping what the witness says could have been a body. The body was, I am told, covered in some fashion, and that this happened at a public landfill not long before closing time.  Now, when this happened, sources close to the investigation would not tell me exactly when this happened. But again, it was close to closing time. And this is a landfill where the public can go and dispose of waste. Now, this same witness claims to have told police that he saw a vehicle and was able to provide a tag number to police. I am told that this is a registered car in Aruba, but I can`t tell you more than that.
      http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0507/29/ng.01.html


      Roy Tromp
      CNN NEWS
      July 30, 2005


      In addition to the pond, Trump said authorities are searching a landfill for the third time since a witness came forward shortly after Holloway disappeared. Trump said that authorities did not want to leave any stone unturned.

      The witness claimed he saw more than one person dump into the landfill something he believes could have been a covered body, CNN has learned from sources briefed on the investigation. The witness also gave police a license tag number that reportedly belonged to a white pickup truck.

      Police tell CNN that a tag check found that the vehicle was not at the landfill at or around the time the witness claimed.

      http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/07/30/aruba.missing/index.html


      Police tell CNN that a tag check found that the vehicle was not at the landfill at or around the time the witness claimed.

      The police force of Aruba would never lie, would they??

      Nadira: Big people lie every now and then. It is normal in Aruba....


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: caesu on March 05, 2008, 08:41:28 AM
      Hi caesu, hey is the phone call to Joran pre-recorded or will it happen live?

      I hope he keeps on talkin'.

      pre-recorded. they showed him answering the phone yesterday.

      so, he does answer and take some questions?

      i don't know. all they showed is that he answered the phone.
      (http://i27.tinypic.com/t0qoft.png)
      (http://i26.tinypic.com/2ly3cjc.png)
      (http://i28.tinypic.com/2mruqfd.png)
      Beth, Patrick, Bram, Peter.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: pinkbanana on March 05, 2008, 09:07:49 AM
      Beth Holloway at Robert Jensen last night:

      link opens in windows media player (http://www.rtl.nl/(channel=rtl5,progid=jensen,zone=rtlgemist.rtl.nl/jensen,vm=/shows/jensen/home/,ord=1204721993449)/system/video/wvx/components/shows/jensen/miMedia/2008/week10/di_beth_holloway_4mrt.avi_plain.xml/796.wvx)

      link also here:
      http://www.rtl.nl/shows/jensen/home/index.xml

      tonight Patrick, Peter R. de Vries, Beth Holloway (and Bram Moszkowicz?).

      also a phonecall to Joran.

      (http://www.rtl.nl/shows/jensen/components/images/jensen-patrick.jpg)

      Bram Moszkowicz also tonight at Pauw/Witteman.
      http://pauwenwitteman.vara.nl/uitzending.php?id=318


      Good Morning!


      I just came on to say, thank you to caesu for the link.

      d


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: BUCKSHOT on March 05, 2008, 09:11:17 AM
      Missing shoe was definitely mentioned very early in case.
      Blood evidence in shoe, possibly.
      Freddy was reported to be replacing shoes for Joran.


      Landfill may have been disposal area for Natalee.
      Landfill caught on fire.
      Dave needed permits to search landfill.
      Search of landfill was sabotaged - garbage piled over search area in dump.


      NH was probably moved from landfill, professionally, to never be found again.

      Witness, who observed landfill disposal, is probably dead or institutionalized.

      Men, in dune area as Dave approached, slamming trunk and taking off.

      Lots of coincidences occur in Aruba.................


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: caesu on March 05, 2008, 09:16:00 AM
      Quote
      Possible irregularities in prison Sint Maarten.

      05-03-2008

      The current affairs program NOVA showed beginning these week a reportage concerning possible irregularities in the prison on Sint Maarten. A Dutch civil servant who provided technical support in the prison returned early to the Netherlands. He reported about fraud but that resulted in a disagreement with the prison Executive Board.
       
      For the parlaiment this reason was ask clarification to minister of justice Hirsch Balin and State Secretary Ank Bijleveld. Hero Brinkman of the PVV asked in vain for an emergency debate with the minister. He sees, however, this as a confirmation for corruption allegation on the islands.

      Mess

      Brinkman works at present for an initiative motion concerning corruption by antillian rulers and politicians. Pvv-politician want submit these in May. I have come behind that it is a terrible mess at the prison on Sint Maarten. 200.000 guilder has disappeared, where the director is possibly even involved, Brinkman claims. Also he has discovered that prisoners stay sometimes as much as two years too long in the prison. This is within a rule of law a disgrace, thinks Brinkman. Former-policeman Brinkman bases this on sources within and outside the Antilles.Also he has received numerous e-mails.

      John Leerdam, Antillen-woordvoerder of the PVDA, does not want react to the allegations made in NOVA. He waits firstly a letter of State Secretary Bijleveld of kingdom relations and of minister Hirsch Balin van Justitie. We want be informed firstly. We must know the facts firstly.

      http://antilliaans.caribiana.nl/bovenwinden/Car20080305_Gevangenis-NOVA

      http://antilliaans.caribiana.nl/politiek/Car20080305_Dienstreizen

      friday/saturday part two and three on NOVA about corruption on antilles/aruba.

      e-mail Hero Brinkman:

      http://www.pvv.nl/index.php?option=com_facileforms&Itemid=114



      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: wreck on March 05, 2008, 09:22:53 AM
      Missing shoe was definitely mentioned very early in case.
      Blood evidence in shoe, possibly.
      Freddy was reported to be replacing shoes for Joran.


      Landfill may have been disposal area for Natalee.
      Landfill caught on fire.
      Dave needed permits to search landfill.
      Search of landfill was sabotaged - garbage piled over search area in dump.


      NH was probably moved from landfill, professionally, to never be found again.

      Witness, who observed landfill disposal, is probably dead or institutionalized.

      Men, in dune area as Dave approached, slamming trunk and taking off.

      Lots of coincidences occur in Aruba.................
      I'm kind of the mind that Natalee wasn't disposed of into the sea for at least a few days. I think she was buried and moved a few times (perhaps the landfill figured in here.) I also think Joran confessed on June 10th and actually believed he was going to take them to her body. It wasn't there because somene (Paulus) had arranged to have it disposed of professionally.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Tater on March 05, 2008, 09:22:54 AM
      Missing shoe was definitely mentioned very early in case.
      Blood evidence in shoe, possibly.
      Freddy was reported to be replacing shoes for Joran.


      Landfill may have been disposal area for Natalee.
      Landfill caught on fire.
      Dave needed permits to search landfill.
      Search of landfill was sabotaged - garbage piled over search area in dump.


      NH was probably moved from landfill, professionally, to never be found again.

      Witness, who observed landfill disposal, is probably dead or institutionalized.

      Men, in dune area as Dave approached, slamming trunk and taking off.

      Lots of coincidences occur in Aruba.................


      That's the thing for me.They kept moving her over and over because of all the tips coming out.Finally they were in so deep they simply just finished the job taking her out so deep she'd never be found.I at this point do not believe that Natalee will ever be found and our only hope is to somehow bring the perpetraters to justice,all of them..Even if  Mos wanted to produce her remains,he can't because of her final resting location..Just my opinion...


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Destiny on March 05, 2008, 09:41:43 AM
      This has most likely been posted already but I just ran across this Aruba bloggers site.  Is this "The" Gabrial we all know?  Visit his blog if you haven't been there yet. You need to scroll down some to get past the ads.


      http://www.arubabeaches.net/

      Author

      My name is Gabriel and work daily with visitors from all over the world. Due to the nature of my work I interact with visitors constantly, consequently I get asked plenty of questions and therefore have a good idea what kind of information to share with you. As a native to Aruba and a tourism and real estate professional I think I’m well qualified share some insider information with you. Occasionally I invite guest-authors to post their thoughts on several topics as well.


      RECENT BLOG ENTRY:

      United States of America on Aruba
      posted on February 29th, 2008 ·

      (http://tinyurl.com/3xucll)


      (http://tinyurl.com/3y3wqm)


      US Government Aircraft On Aruba

      Today at the airport I noticed an unusual visitor to Aruba. It is a United States government aircraft, serial number 90003. Generally these aircraft make a technical stop in Aruba, before continuing their journey down south.

      Rarely does it stay long on the island. But this aircraft is scheduled to stay in Aruba for two days, meaning a high US government or military official or delegation is on the island on business.

      I remember a case last year where United States Secretary of State, Dr. Rice was en route to Brazil and made a refueling stop on the island. This time around there is no word (not to me at least) who is visiting. Welcome, nonetheless.


      Yes we know they are there...but unfortunatly, Aruban Beech Patrol doesn't...as I was told...there are NO US Government planes on Aruba!...why do they think they can spout rubbage...and that anyone they tell it to is supposed to believe them...sheesh!  I guess they are so used to telling lies...must just be a way of life with them...


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Rob on March 05, 2008, 09:52:04 AM
      DEVELOPING

      Developing Story (Click refresh for updates): Venezuela moves 10 tank battalions to Colombian border, according to Reuters report.

      http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,335116,00.html

      Also, Apple is running commercials here every 30 minutes or so and has been for the last two weeks. No Aruba.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Destiny on March 05, 2008, 09:56:50 AM
      Aruba phone book

      http://www.numberway.com/phone-numbers/53/

      Sorry, I don't know how to link.

      Thank You Betty Lynn!!!

      Destiny ;-)


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Blonde on March 05, 2008, 10:04:37 AM
      I found old Transcripts from May-June 2005 that I had posted. this might help you guys.
      http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2580.msg343607#msg343607


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Destiny on March 05, 2008, 10:06:55 AM

      Developing Story (Click refresh for updates): Venezuela moves 10 tank battalions to Colombian border, according to Reuters report.

      A top general said Wednesday that Venezuela has nearly completed its deployment of thousands of troops to states along the border with Colombia.

      "Between 85 and 90 percent of the troops are situated," Gen. Jesus Gonzalez Gonzalez told reporters at a news conference, saying soldiers were largely sent to the border states of Zulia, Tachira and Apure.

      Venezuela's military mobilization includes air, land and sea forces in Colombia dispute, Reuters reports.

      The Associated Press contributed to this report.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: mlspdq on March 05, 2008, 10:11:57 AM
       ::MonkeyDance::

      Country code # 297
      Sloot Paulus A Van Der    Montanja 19  587-2711

      http://arubayp.com/communityinfo.html?PageNumber=3
       


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Bladerunner on March 05, 2008, 10:16:33 AM
      I believe a helicopter drop is a plausible scenario, however, I think we need to keep in mind that the more people that would have needed to be involved in the disposal the less likely that scenario actually happened.

      What has stunned me--and others have stated the same--is that we know this was a cover-up from the beginning, yet, there have been no leaks from anyone about it. This leads me to believe the cover-up was orchestrated by only a handful of people. So with a helicopter scenario the pilot would have to be in on it too. Chasing someone around is a lot different then helping dispose of a body. Just some thoughts.

      Who knows how to fly choppers in Aruba?


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Lala'sMom on March 05, 2008, 10:27:17 AM
      I believe a helicopter drop is a plausible scenario, however, I think we need to keep in mind that the more people that would have needed to be involved in the disposal the less likely that scenario actually happened.

      What has stunned me--and others have stated the same--is that we know this was a cover-up from the beginning, yet, there have been no leaks from anyone about it. This leads me to believe the cover-up was orchestrated by only a handful of people. So with a helicopter scenario the pilot would have to be in on it too. Chasing someone around is a lot different then helping dispose of a body. Just some thoughts.

      Who knows how to fly choppers in Aruba?

      The only connection to aviation that I have seen so far that is yet to be explained is Andres Meneses.   He was questioned numerous times.  I doubt he flies helicopters...but maybe he knows someone that does/did.  Still waiting for that story to play out. Of course, this was in 2006 and not in 2005.  Probably no connection.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: AZSunny on March 05, 2008, 10:27:40 AM

      [\Quote]
      Steve Croes dad bought the computer place where Depak Kalpoe worked the following August after that May is what I heard and Steve Croes went to work in there.  I really do not know.  Just may be scuttlebutt.  Guess he wanted a job after the Tattoo let him go.  That is one way to get one.  I wonder if Depak still works there?   j/b
      [/quote]

      Jack, I believe it was Depaks father that bought the internet cafe that Depak worked in, not Steve Croes dad.  Croes took the job as a DJ at Carlos and Charlies.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: GBMW on March 05, 2008, 10:30:01 AM
      Hi caesu, hey is the phone call to Joran pre-recorded or will it happen live?

      I hope he keeps on talkin'.

      pre-recorded. they showed him answering the phone yesterday.

      so, he does answer and take some questions?

      i don't know. all they showed is that he answered the phone.
      (http://i27.tinypic.com/t0qoft.png)
      (http://i26.tinypic.com/2ly3cjc.png)
      (http://i28.tinypic.com/2mruqfd.png)
      Beth, Patrick, Bram, Peter.

      I didn't hear Jorans voice; did you? I do think Joran would pick up the phone (because I think they used Patricks phone & of course he has his number in his memory) but would probably hang up the moment he would hear Robert Jensens voice. So hopefully Patrick is the one who does the talking ;-). There is also a possibility he didn't pick up though...since a couple of Jorans cellphone numbers have been online (although I haven't seen the number we have of him online as of yet) he probably got a lot of calls and got a new number ;-)

      And (maybe old info; sorry!): Bram Moszkowicz will be on Pauw & Witteman tonight; concerning the possible civil case against Joran.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Rob on March 05, 2008, 10:30:51 AM
      I believe a helicopter drop is a plausible scenario, however, I think we need to keep in mind that the more people that would have needed to be involved in the disposal the less likely that scenario actually happened.

      What has stunned me--and others have stated the same--is that we know this was a cover-up from the beginning, yet, there have been no leaks from anyone about it. This leads me to believe the cover-up was orchestrated by only a handful of people. So with a helicopter scenario the pilot would have to be in on it too. Chasing someone around is a lot different then helping dispose of a body. Just some thoughts.

      Who knows how to fly choppers in Aruba?

      Bladerunner, there were / are only 4 registered helicopters on Aruba, or were when Natalee became a crime victim.

      One would obviously be the copter with the Aruba flag (ALE and the one that searched the Marriott pond in a grid pattern, also this is the copter that almost slammed in to Dave in his copter), another would be the black tourist tour copter... and I am not sure who possessed the other two.

      We found that info when looking at Roman Abramovich and his helicopter - XTC with was on-board the Ecstasea .


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Rob on March 05, 2008, 10:34:19 AM
      I believe a helicopter drop is a plausible scenario, however, I think we need to keep in mind that the more people that would have needed to be involved in the disposal the less likely that scenario actually happened.

      What has stunned me--and others have stated the same--is that we know this was a cover-up from the beginning, yet, there have been no leaks from anyone about it. This leads me to believe the cover-up was orchestrated by only a handful of people. So with a helicopter scenario the pilot would have to be in on it too. Chasing someone around is a lot different then helping dispose of a body. Just some thoughts.

      Who knows how to fly choppers in Aruba?

      Bladerunner, there were / are only 4 registered helicopters on Aruba, or were when Natalee became a crime victim.

      One would obviously be the copter with the Aruba flag (ALE and the one that searched the Marriott pond in a grid pattern, also this is the copter that almost slammed in to Dave in his copter), another would be the black tourist tour copter... and I am not sure who possessed the other two.

      We found that info when looking at Roman Abramovich and his helicopter - XTC4 with was on-board the Ecstasea .

      self edit to add the number 4


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Blonde on March 05, 2008, 10:50:35 AM
      I believe a helicopter drop is a plausible scenario, however, I think we need to keep in mind that the more people that would have needed to be involved in the disposal the less likely that scenario actually happened.

      What has stunned me--and others have stated the same--is that we know this was a cover-up from the beginning, yet, there have been no leaks from anyone about it. This leads me to believe the cover-up was orchestrated by only a handful of people. So with a helicopter scenario the pilot would have to be in on it too. Chasing someone around is a lot different then helping dispose of a body. Just some thoughts.

      Who knows how to fly choppers in Aruba?



      Doesn't the PM have access to one


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Lala'sMom on March 05, 2008, 10:53:51 AM
      Bladerunner
      By keeping all your dirty deeds within the confines of only a few people one can accomplish much.  Paulus and Straten could keep the big secrets and then the others are left floundering in the sun trying to catch up.  When Beth was at the police station to give her first statement...remember there was Jan van der Straten and Dennis Jacobs in the same building.  They kept her waiting for 2 hours and then told her they didn't need her statement.  I think the Kalpoes vehicle was in there in the yard and who knows who was there also. Keep the truth within a handful of people (PVDS, Straten, Jacobs) and remove the rest from the equation.  If none of those three say anything, it's all speculation as to what really happened. Gives you time to hide and destroy any evidence that may have existed. Jacobs was in on most all the important interrogations and questioning.  We now know that Joran has mostly likely already told the story of her dying in his presence and that she had a seizure...so daddy goes to his dear friend with the same story that Joran told Patrick...minus the body disposal at sea...and the cover up begins.  "How can I arrest my best friend's son?" 


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: private eye on March 05, 2008, 11:10:45 AM
      Good morning, hitting and running but still thinking about Anita's diatribe as to the description of Natalee's panties and other specifics, accurate I think from Beth's comments in the press, or at least having seen the subject of the diatribe.

      Anita was trying to shame Beth off of the island, using what she thinks is discretion. She purposely wanted Beth to know that Natalee was sexually active and to do so she had to accurately describe Natalee's privates. She did it off camera but in front of Greta, and as Greta claimed, the conversation made her want to crawl under the table. Anita felt Beth would cave and runa back home in shame or to prevent the discussion from becoming public. This was the start of Anita's involvement of the coverup. There is no earthly other reason for that conversation to have occurred. And she has been bashing Natalee every since.



      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: private eye on March 05, 2008, 11:12:49 AM
      and by sexually active I don't mean to imply voluntary


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: klaasend on March 05, 2008, 11:17:16 AM
      Posted on the front page of SM:

      EURobert wrote:

      Summary of the most important parts of the Jensen interview with PRdeVries from 03-03.

      http://tinyurl.com/326nc9

      PRdeVries (edited): When we started the show (with Patrick) the case actually was closed and Joran thought ‘he was off the hook’, and he was about to claim a damage-compensation. Now the investigation is reopened and behind the screen people work VERY hard on it ‘I know that from sources close to the case’. JORAN NOW OFFICIALLY IS SUSPECTED OF MURDER!

      Jensen about interview with Joran (edited): I went into that interview unprepared, as if I was talking to someone in a bar. But I clearly noticed when he started to hesitate and turn, starting at the question: how did you get from the beach to your home. I told him straight forward: you know more of this case. Then Joran looked at me with his ’stone-hard’ eyes, ‘glass-hard’-eyes and said: No Jensen, that’s really not so, that’s really not so’. After the show I asked the public: ‘What do you think?’. And 99% of the audience thought he knew more of what happened.

      Peter (edited): A year and a half ago I’d done a show on this subject. And already then I thought: Joran vd Sloot you know more of this thing, you don’t tell the truth, you hide things. And you can’t give answers to the most simple questions. And an innocent person doesn’t have to call for his right to remain silent. And when you’re innocent you want to say the truth ten times over!

      Jensen (edited): At Pauw en Witteman you constantly looked at him and thought ‘you’re a liar, you’re a liar’. And he felt that constantly because of which he snapped. You know with the wine and so on… And your wife made that clever remark about Joran to Anita: “Well, you brought that up right!” (Fragment of wine incident.) And she right away threw a glass of water at Joran, didn’t she?

      Peter (ed.): Yes off course… What he can, she can do as well. LOL It all was a reaction on the fact that Anita throughout the show claimed ‘Joran was a d-e-c-e-n-t guy’ (…).

      Jensen(ed.): I have the feeling those people absolutely don’t have any control over this guy anymore.

      Peter (ed.): I have the impression that the parents don’t know half of what he’s all into. And it’s odd that they claim they would bring him to the police if they only had the smallest idea of him having something to do with it. Well, untill today I haven’t seen anything of that! LOL Even after my sting operation they don’t tell him to finally tell the truth.



      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: klaasend on March 05, 2008, 11:20:52 AM
      Posted by Heli at RU:

      The Jensen Show
      RTL - The Netherlands
      March 5, 2008

      Guest: Beth Holloway

      Transcribed from audio files provided by Abarth

      Part I

      Beth:

      If I have to look at everything about that interview with Joran and when he's talking to Patrick, the part where I really want to come through and I really just want to kill him Robert and I mean when he imitates her, when he imitates her, when he imitates her actions as she's suffering. I'm thinking 'what, what a sick sonofabitch'. I'm sorry but I mean you know, how could, I mean, I mean, I think that's what really brings it all to the truth for me is, it's just not him, it's just his verbalization of what she's doing but he imitates her with this body action.

      Jensen:

      I understand because I mean those are kind of rough words, I mean what you're saying about wanting to kill him but I understand. I mean it's a natural way, a natural anger in a way, because I also because, I want to show you something because I had the Goldman family on the show, you know the parents of the guy O.J. Simpson killed

      Beth:

      Yeah, yeah

      Jensen:

      They are exactly, well they're in a similar position as you are

      Beth:

      Right

      Jensen:

      I don't know if you've ever met them?

      Beth:

      I've spoken with Denise, Nicole Brown Simpson's sister and I'll be honest Robert, I think about them a lot when I think about Natalee's case because I think here they're having to do the same thing.

      Jensen:

      I mean O.J., he got away and we all know it's obvious that he killed their son and I want to show you something because the way they go about life nowadays, and I respect that I applaud that; I mean some people will say it's vindictive but it's not, it's just you know, you don't want the killer as they call O.J. or the person who perpetrated this

      Beth:

      Yes, yes

      Jensen:

      you don't want them to get away; even if he's not in jail, you want to make his life a living hell when he's still walking amongst us and I want to show you just this clip of the Goldmans.

      (play videoclip)

      There are similarities aren't there Beth?

      Beth:

      Yeah there are and I think about them a lot Robert, everyday that I've tried to, because some days you really struggle with the bitterness and it's you know, it's hard to remain, as far as optimistic about the future and reaching out to thers and that's really what I'm trying to do. I'm really trying to continue that mission of reaching out to others and making a difference but you know, it's hard some days and you just want to give in to that but when I think about people like you know, I think about them and I draw a lot of strength from them that if they can continue this and knowing full well who their loved one's perpetrator was, then I can too.

      Jensen:

      Yeah, I understand that. Another thing that's happened since you were last on, I couldn't believe it but actually Joran came on my show. He had put out this book and he wanted to promote it but he still, to come on my show. I know a lot about the case knowing you and so he came on my show and I went in, you know I said this to Peter R. de Vries last night, he was on the show, I said I just went in like you know, let's just start and talk; I wanted to talk to the guy like we were in a bar you know and I just waited for the moment I felt 'oh now he's being evasive, now he's dodging my questions, now he's starting to ' and that happened pretty quickly, I mean the whole incident, I mean 'how did you get from the beach to your house?' that's where it all started to become 'I don't know' he became like a magician, he pulled every string available to him, it sort of, it didn't make sense anymore but I want to show you a few things, but especially, we mixed it up with the tape from Peter R. de Vries, so his real confession

      Beth:

      Okay

      Jensen:

      If you look at this, we subtitled it for you so you understand what he said in Dutch. It's just horrible; I leaned on him pretty hard, I leaned on him pretty hard. You can see in his body language he's leaning forward because I felt 'you're hiding something' Let's just start here with the incident on the beach, what he said on my show and then what he said to Patrick.

      (play videotape)

      I'll put this out to everybody: where do you think he was telling the truth?

      Beth:

      Oh exactly, right there

      Jensen:

      Yeah

      Beth:

      Exactly at that moment and what's so, what's so really completely frustrating about this whole deal is when he says epileptic seizures, I can't tell you how many times we were asked that Robert, within 48 hours.

      Jensen:

      That is true, I've heard that, you have to elaborate on that

      Beth:

      Yeah

      Jensen:

      The prosecutor asked you about that or he asked you about that?

      Beth:

      No, the prosecutor did not but a lead detective asked me within 48 hours of her disappearance, he asked me when I entered the Bubali police station, he said, he asked only one medical question, now I could see, I mean just one, he says 'does Natalee have a history of epilepsy or seizures?' and I was like 'no' and then let's move on

      Jensen:

      Right, so the question is where did that come from?

      Beth:

      Where did that come from? It's hard not to tie those two things togther. It's really hard not to put those two pieces together.

      Jensen:

      It's interesting because what I've followed from you and also what you've put out in the american press, this is something that really caught your eye from this whole experience, this Peter R. de Vries undercover sting

      Beth:

      That's it

      Jensen:

      That's it huh? This is a major thing

      Beth:

      Yes

      Jensen:

      You were asked within 48 hours about that seizure and seizures, seizures, it almost sounds like this guy brings that up, so I mean, I'm just (inaudbile) he must have just mentioned that to somebody over there

      Beth:

      Somebody because I was only asked that once but my husband at the time, Jug was asked at least, at least a dozen times by four different persons (inaudible) but we never really thought to much about it becuase we were just like 'please get them off that and get back on

      Jensen

      the case

      Beth:

      (inaudible) so it didn't make any, it didn't really, we didn't really have any red flags

      Jensen:

      So perhaps Joran confessed to somebody there. Let me show you another clip because it's just so obvious where, that he's lying, that he's lying but it says so much about the person, it's so weird. This is about the shoe incident, that's a big thing. How many stories did he tell about this, about 22 or something? Leaving the shoes on the beach

      Beth:

      Yeah, yeah, the shoe was, yeah

      Jensen:

      Take a look at this Beth, this is unbelievable

      (play videoclip)

      Bet this drove you absolutely crazy didn't it during the investigation?

      Beth:

      Yes

      Jensen:

      Him just changing his story and lying, knowing that he lies all the time, and not getting to the truth, not owning up to anything

      Beth:

      God, don't you know the interrogators want to get hold of him, I mean the things he did to them by just toying with them, he would stick his fingers in his ears during the interrogation and just smile, don't you know they just wanted to just grab him and

      Jensen:

      Just think of the psyche of the person I mean, knowing all that, knowing you did all that and then writing a book about it

      Beth:

      I know

      Jensen:

      So I want to show you what he told me about why he wrote the book, I couldn't understand why he would do it, but this is what he told me an the real reason follows

      (play videoclip)

      * long sigh from Jensen *

      Beth:

      Yeah, yeah

      Jensen:

      What do you make of that?

      Beth:

      He just wants to see how he can benefit from it or what he can profit from, golly I tell you what, he is truly just taking anyone he could for a ride

      Jensen:

      Yeah, he has

      Beth:

      He really did, yeah

      Jensen:

      It's unbelievable. Finally my final clip and I want to show this. I think this was the worse thing for me, the way I interpreted it he doesn't feel guilty at all

      Beth:

      Yeah

      Jensen:

      After he went to bed that night, didn't lose a minute of sleep over it, can you believe that Beth? Let's take a look

      (play videoclip)

      He really doesn't care, he really doesn't care

      Beth:

      No, he doesn't


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: sirensong on March 05, 2008, 11:24:54 AM
      Good morning, hitting and running but still thinking about Anita's diatribe as to the description of Natalee's panties and other specifics, accurate I think from Beth's comments in the press, or at least having seen the subject of the diatribe.

      Anita was trying to shame Beth off of the island, using what she thinks is discretion. She purposely wanted Beth to know that Natalee was sexually active and to do so she had to accurately describe Natalee's privates. She did it off camera but in front of Greta, and as Greta claimed, the conversation made her want to crawl under the table. Anita felt Beth would cave and runa back home in shame or to prevent the discussion from becoming public. This was the start of Anita's involvement of the coverup. There is no earthly other reason for that conversation to have occurred. And she has been bashing Natalee every since.



      Absolutely, Private eye!  Good post.  I believe Joran was doing the same thing.   I never thought about Anita doing the same, but  she did.  This part of the whole case makes me maddest of all.  Joran and Anita talking about what Joran did to  Natalee.  What  kind of monsters would tell the  parents these things, then the public.  It was only to slander this  beautiful girl that they knew was dead.   I hate them all.  ROBOTS  COME BACK!!


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Rob on March 05, 2008, 11:29:01 AM
      Thank you EURobert and Heli for that.

      I know some of the Dutch posters are not fond of Mr. Jensen, but he sounds pretty fair minded and was truly compassionate toward Beth. I appreciated that.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Tamikosmom on March 05, 2008, 11:30:28 AM
      I found old Transcripts from May-June 2005 that I had posted. this might help you guys.
      http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2580.msg343607#msg343607


      Thanks Blonde.  Those articles/transcripts were a very interesting read.

      I wonder why the three judge panel ruled that that there was sufficient evidence to further detain Joran when Deepak and Satish were released.

      Janet

      ++++++++++++

      Jug Twitty
      NANCY GRACE
      July 14, 2005


      GEORGE "JUG" TWITTY, STEPFATHER OF NATALEE HOLLOWAY: ...  But today, there actually wasn`t one judge. I think there was a three-judge panel that came in and made the decision. And you know, at least they did keep Joran in there. I think, if they would have let him out, it would have been devastating to Beth and I, actually probably to the whole world.

      GRACE: You know what? You`re right, Jug. You`re right. At least they kept Joran Van Der Sloot behind bars.

      http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0507/14/ng.01.html



      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Anna on March 05, 2008, 11:37:17 AM
      Thank you EURobert and Heli for that.

      I know some of the Dutch posters are not fond of Mr. Jensen, but he sounds pretty fair minded and was truly compassionate toward Beth. I appreciated that.


      Just finished watching/listening and I, too, was very impressed with how he interviews Beth.  One couldn't ask for more of a gentleman in his dealings with her in both this interview and his previous one.

      Now am I to understand that tonight, he will do the second part with Beth, Peter R and Patrick all together?

      .


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Anna on March 05, 2008, 11:41:26 AM
      Posted by Debbie at BlogsForNatalee.com

       on: March 04, 2008, 10:41:29 PM »   

      --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      http://www.peterrdevries.nl/

      DE PERS EN PATRICK

      HOE DE MEDIA MET EEN WERELDSCOOP OMGAAN…

      Met dertig jaar ervaring als misdaadverslaggever heb ik een aardig beeld gekregen van de journalistieke mechanismen die in werking treden als je toevallig een keer een echte scoop hebt, zoals de bekentenissen van Joran van der Sloot. De manier waarop de pers daarover bericht voltrekt zich meestal volgens een vast, herkenbaar patroon.

      ‘EEN BOTJE, EEN KLUIFJE, ALSJEBLIEFT!’

      Op het moment dat je zulk nieuws aankondigt – maar de uitzending zelf moet nog komen - beginnen de collega’s van andere media, die dus eigenlijk je concurrenten zijn, te bellen, alsof je altijd hun beste vriend bent geweest. Het is het startschot voor het gebedel om nieuws. Of je alsjeblieft vast een tipje van de sluier kan oplichten, hen misschien een ‘klein primeurtje’ kan geven. Collega Ton van Dijk verwoordde dat proces onlangs in een email naar mij treffend: ‘Het gehengel der collegae om een snippertje nieuws, om een botje, een kluifje, alsjeblieft!’. Zo is het ook exact gegaan.

      Als de uitzending dan is geweest loopt men de deur plat en word je ook nog steeds ‘van harte’ gefeliciteerd met het succes, maar in het interview zelf is de vraagstelling ineens kritisch(er), om na afloop met een vriendschappelijke schouderklop te zeggen: ‘Ja, je begrijpt wel dat ik voor de vorm ook even tegenwicht moest bieden, toch?’.

      Maar dan komt de fase dat je niet overal kunt zitten, niet aan elk verzoek kunt voldoen en niet iedereen te woord kunt staan. Dat is het moment waarop de reporter zich wendt tot de zogenaamde deskundigen, balorige advocaten en allerhande al dan niet verstrooide strafrechtdeskundigen, die vaak feitelijk verbijsterend slecht geïnformeerd zijn, maar dat door ferme – lees: vaak onjuiste – uitspraken goed weten te camoufleren. Ze weten intuïtief dat er pittige quotes worden verwacht, want voor hen natuurlijk tien anderen.

      AFGUNST EN GEMAKZUCHT

      Na een dag of twee, drie braaf achter de affaire te hebben aangelopen worden de meeste journalisten dat zat en beginnen om zich heen te kijken of zij niet zelf wat nieuws kunnen maken in de affaire, waarmee ze toch even in de warme gloed van de scoop kunnen staan. Dat is in de praktijk bijna altijd iets wat afbreuk doet aan het verhaal. Per slot van rekening is afgunst – naast gemakzucht - de best ontwikkelde karaktereigenschap van de meeste journalisten.

      Gevolg is dat hoofdverdachte Joran van der Sloot, de man die op tape bekent dat Natalee in zijn armen is doodgegaan, waarna hij haar in de oceaan heeft laten dumpen, een soort van underdog wordt, terwijl undercover Patrick van der Eem door een aantal media op de grill wordt gelegd.

      KOORKNAAP OF MAN VAN DE STRAAT (TRANSLATION BELOW BEGINS HERE)

      De Panorama en de Nieuwe Revu komen deze week met coverstory’s over ‘het verleden’ van Patrick van der Eem. Nu had Van der Eem daar zelf al helemaal niet zo geheimzinnig over gedaan. In mijn programma, maar ook in andere media (bijvoorbeeld Pauw & Witteman) heeft hij toegegeven in het verleden veroordeeld te zijn voor drugsbezit (heroïne) en alle randverschijnselen die daarbij horen. Inmiddels heeft hij al jaren een eigen bedrijf en dateert zijn laatste veroordeling van lang geleden, maar Van der Eem zal nu niet van zichzelf zeggen dat hij een koorknaap is. Sterker nog, hij noemt zich ‘een man van de straat’ en dat was nu juist één van de redenen waarom Joran graag in zijn gezelschap vertoefde. De legendarische Amsterdamse oud-commissaris Gerard Toorenaar zei mij al toen ik zijn memoires schreef: ‘Boeven vang je niet met de dominee of de pastoor’. Met zijn verleden kon Patrick die rol goed spelen.

      Niettemin doen de bladen nu alsof zij een spectaculaire onthulling doen met dit verleden. Panorama op de cover: ‘Het drugsverleden van Patrick van der Eem - ‘Hij dealde heroïne en snoof coke’) . Nieuwe Revu op de cover: ‘Het viessse verleden van Patrick van der Eem. Drugshandel, vechtpartijen, inbraken’. Terwijl uit het verhaal blijkt dat hij voor die inbraken nooit is aangeklaagd, laat staan veroordeeld, maar dat terzijde.

      PATRICK OP DE GRILL, JORAN VRIJUIT?

      De vraag is: doet het verleden van Patrick er iets toe of zouden de media zich beter eens op het verleden van Joran kunnen richten? Waarom wordt Patrick op de grill gelegd en slikt men alle smoezen van Joran over zijn bekentenissen? Het lijkt een beetje de omgekeerde wereld. Patrick wordt niet gezocht. Hij is niet voortvluchtig. Er staat geen straf tegen hem open. Hij wordt niet van misdaden verdacht. Hij heeft slechts geprobeerd – en met succes! – de verdwijning van Natalee Holloway op te helderen door Joran zijn aandeel te laten bekennen.

      Is het verleden dan misschien belangrijk om de betrouwbaarheid van Van der Eem te toetsen? Dat zou kunnen spelen als Van der Eem alleen maar een verklaring-van-horen-zeggen tegen Joran van der Sloot had afgelegd. Dan wil je natuurlijk weten: spreekt deze man wel de waarheid of liegt of overdrijft hij misschien? Maar ja, dat is in deze zaak niet aan de orde, nu drie camera’s precies hebben vastgelegd wat Joran zélf heeft gezegd. Al was Van der Eem de grootste cokesnuiver van het westelijk halfrond, een oplichter van het kaliber van Heer Olivier, een grotere fantast dan de Baron von Münchhausen of een beruchtere brandkastenkraker dan Aage M., dan nog is het Joran die zélf zegt dat Natalee in zijn armen is doodgegaan en dat hij vervolgens de halve wereld daarover heeft voorgelogen.
       
      JOURNALISTIEK UIT DUCKSTAD

      Wie vervolgens de moeite neemt om de verhalen in Panorama en Nieuwe Revu te lezen, stuit op onderzoeksjournalistiek uit Duckstad. In hun haast Van der Eem af te branden kon kennelijk niemand worden gevonden die daar met naam en toenaam over wilde verklaren. Meestal is dat een veeg teken, wat veel zegt over het waarheidsgehalte, maar de bladen hebben zich daar in hun verkoopverlangen niet door laten weerhouden. In het hele Panorama-verhaal worden uitsluitend anonieme bronnen opgevoerd: Een ‘voormalig onderwereldfiguur’ en ‘zegslieden die anoniem willen blijven’ vormen de enige sprekers in het verhaal. Het is waarschijnlijk de voormalige onderwereldfiguur die in al de verhalen van deze verslaggever wordt opgevoerd en waarvan we maar moeten geloven dat hij werkelijk bestaat.   

      TEMEIERS EN GEWONE WIJVEN

      En wat zeggen deze anonieme bronnen onder meer? Houdt u vast: ‘Patrick was ook een liefhebber van orgies op hotelkamers, waar temeiers en gewone wijven werden uitgewoond door hem en zijn vriendjes’. Ik zie het de investigative reporter van Panorama gretig opschrijven, terwijl het kwijl hem uit de mond loopt. Wat er trouwens precies bedoeld wordt met ‘gewone wijven’ mag Joost weten, of is dat hoe mannenblad Panorama vrouwen pleegt te betitelen? Opvallend is ook dat de liefde bedrijven in zo’n verhaal, dat Van der Eem als een onbetrouwbare schurk moet neerzetten dan meteen uitwonen heet. En dit alles uiteraard zonder één regel wederhoor. Want stel je voor dat Van der Eem iets tegenspreekt of ontkracht. Maar de kernvraag is en blijft natuurlijk: zegt het feit dat Patrick in het verleden wel eens voor drugsbezit/handel is veroordeeld en kennelijk een vrouwenliefhebber is iets over de bekentenissen van Joran?

      13 ANONIEME BRONNEN

      Nieuwe Revu maakt het zo mogelijk nog bonter (maar biedt wel een kadertje wederhoor). De reporters hebben er eens flink aan getrokken en brouwen een verhaal van in totaal zes pagina’s. Zeg niet dat ze bij dit blad over één nacht ijs gaan. En wie zijn daar de betrouwbare bronnen? Ik som ze even voor u op:


      - Een ‘vroegere buurman’
      - Een ‘heer die een ommetje maakt’
      - Een ‘echtpaar dat ons in de deuropening te woord staat’
      - De voormalige ‘overbuurman’
      - Een ‘andere wijkbewoner’
      - Een ‘vrouw die haar hondje uitlaat’
      - Een ‘voormalig uitsmijter’
      - Een ‘buurvrouw’
      - Een ‘andere voormalige zakenrelatie’
      - Een ‘intimus van de familie’
      - Een ‘jeugdvriend’
      - ‘Iemand die slechts op basis van anonimiteit wil praten’
      - Een ‘informant’

      Nou, dat is Nieuwe Revu journalistiek in optima forma! En dan heeft men de ‘altijd goed ingevoerde taxichauffeur’ en de ‘immer welingelichte dorpskapper’ waarschijnlijk nog achter de hand gehouden.

      Nee, geef mij dan maar Patrick Van der Eem, die gewoon open en bloot staat voor wat hij in deze zaak heeft gedaan.
       
      SLOTVRAAG

      Tot slot nog dit. Wat denkt u dat deze bladen zouden hebben gedaan als Patrick van der Eem met het hele verhaal over Joran niet naar ons maar naar hen was gekomen en zij het hadden kunnen publiceren? Denkt u dat ze dan verontwaardigd hadden gezegd: Néé, daar kunnen we niet aan beginnen, want volgens ‘een heer die een ommetje maakt’ en een ‘voormalige uitsmijter’ heb je wel eens in drugs gedaan en heb je in een hotelkamer wel eens ‘gewone wijven’ uitgewoond!

      Gelooft u het? Maar goed, zo werkt de journalistiek dus.

      Peter R. de Vries


      TRANSLATION:

      Choirboy or Man of the Streets?

      The Panorama and the Nieuwe Revu this week came with cover-story's concerning 'the past of Patrick of of the Eem'.  Van der Eem himself has not been secretive about this, in my programme, but also in other media (for example Pauw & Witteman) he has admitted to have been convicted for drugs (heroine) possession and all phenomena that go with that.  Meanwhile he has owned his own company for many years and his last conviction is from a long time ago, but van der Eem will not claim to be a choirboy. More so, he calls himself 'a man of the street' and that has been one of the reasons why Joran liked to be in his company. The legendary old chief commissioner Gerard Toorenaar told me when I was writing his me-moires: 'you do not catch gangsters with the dominee or the pastoor'. With his past Patrick could play that role well.

      Nevertheless the magazines now pretend to do a spectacular revelation with his past. On the cover of Panorama: "The drugs past of Patrick of of the Eem" - "he dealt heroin and sniffed coke". New Revu on the cover: "The dirty past of Patrick van der Eem". Drug trafficking, scuffles, burglaries. Whereas from the stories it becomes clear that he was never prosecuted nor convicted for burglaries, but that on a side note.

      The question is: does the past of Patrick matter, or should the media focus on the past of Joran?
      Why is Patrick being grilled, and does one swallow the inventions of Joran concerning his confessions? It seems a little the world in reverse. Patrick is not being looked out for. He is not a fugitive. There are no open punishments against him. He is not being suspected of crimes. He has only tried - and successfully! - to clear up the disappearance of Natalee Holloway by letting Joran confess his role.

      Is the past then perhaps important to review the reliability of van der Eem? That could be the case if van der Eem only had given a hear-say statement against Joran van der Sloot. Then you want know of course: does this man tell the truth or does he lies or does exaggerates perhaps? But that is not the case, since 3 cameras have captured exactly what Joran himself has said. Even if van der Eeem were the biggest coke sniffer of the western hemisphere, a swindler of the caliber "Heer Olvier" or a bigger fantast than the baron von Münchhausen or a more notorious bank robber then "Age M" then still it is Joran himself who says that Natalee has died in his arms and that he after that has lied to half of the world about that.

      And what do the anonymous sources claim about Patrick? Take a chair: "Patrick also was someone who loved orgies in hotel rooms, where hookers and ordinary bitches became run-down by him and his friends".  I see the investigative reporter of Panorama writing down it down impatiently, whereas the dribble him runs from the mouth. What exactly does he mean with "ordinary bitches"?  Is that how man's magazine Panorama labels women? It is also striking that "making love" in this story, in which van der Eem is being describes as a first class criminal, has to be called "run down".  And all this of course without one line of having asked the person in question. Because imagine that van der Eem would say this did not occur or takes the edge off it. But the main question is and remains: does the fact that Patrick in the past has been condemned for drug possession/trade and allegedly loves woman say anything about the admissions of Joran?

      He who wants to take the effort to read the tales in Panorama and Nieuwe Revu, encounters journalism from Duck-town. In their rush to burn down van der Eem apparently they could not find anyone who wanted to state anything with their name. Generally that is a sign that says much concerning truth quality, but the magazines did not seem to care about that in their lust for sales. In the complete Panorama-story exclusively anonymous sources are intensified: 'former underworld figure' and 'speakers who want to remain anonymous' are the only participants in the tale. It is probably the former underworld figure who is brought up in all these tales and of which we are to believe that he truly exists.

      New Revu makes it even more colorful. The reports have made huge effort to blow up the story to no less then 6 pages. Do not say they went over one night of ice!  And who there are the reliable sources? Let me sum them up for you:

      - a former neighbour man
      - a man who walks around
      - a couple standing in the door-opening
      - the former 'neighbor'
      - person 'living in the neighborhood'
      - woman who takes her dog for a walk
      - a former bouncer
      - neighbour
      - ex business related person
      - inti-mus of the family
      - 'old friend'
      - someone who wants talk only on the basis of anonymity
      - 'informant'

      Well, that is Nieuwe Revu journalism in optima forma! They probably have the always 'well introduced taxi driver ' and the 'always well-informed rural hairdresser ' just in case.  No, then I prefer but Patrick van der Eem, who simply openly stands for what he has done in this matter.

      Finally still this. What do you think you that these magazines would have done if Patrick van der Eem instead of coming to us had went to them, and they could have it published?

      You think that they had said then have said: No!, no way we will do that, because according to 'a woman who walks her dog' or 'a former bouncer' you have done drugs and have run down 'ordinary bitches' in a hotelroom!

      Do you think that would be their answer?

      Well, this is how journalism works.

      Peter R. de Vries.   


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: caesu on March 05, 2008, 11:46:37 AM
      Thank you EURobert and Heli for that.

      I know some of the Dutch posters are not fond of Mr. Jensen, but he sounds pretty fair minded and was truly compassionate toward Beth. I appreciated that.


      Just finished watching/listening and I, too, was very impressed with how he interviews Beth.  One couldn't ask for more of a gentleman in his dealings with her in both this interview and his previous one.

      Now am I to understand that tonight, he will do the second part with Beth, Peter R and Patrick all together?

      .

      yes, tonight beth, peter, patrick en bram mosko - the lawyer.
      (http://www.rtl.nl/shows/jensen/components/images/jensen-de4.jpg)
      both shows taped on tuesday.

      i don't like jensen too much.
      that's why i never watch him or listen to him on the radio.

      but i agree that he does this well. apparently he has a serious side too.
      i didn't know that.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: caesu on March 05, 2008, 11:51:56 AM
      Hi caesu, hey is the phone call to Joran pre-recorded or will it happen live?

      I hope he keeps on talkin'.

      pre-recorded. they showed him answering the phone yesterday.

      so, he does answer and take some questions?

      i don't know. all they showed is that he answered the phone.
      (http://i27.tinypic.com/t0qoft.png)
      (http://i26.tinypic.com/2ly3cjc.png)
      (http://i28.tinypic.com/2mruqfd.png)
      Beth, Patrick, Bram, Peter.

      I didn't hear Jorans voice; did you? I do think Joran would pick up the phone (because I think they used Patricks phone & of course he has his number in his memory) but would probably hang up the moment he would hear Robert Jensens voice. So hopefully Patrick is the one who does the talking ;-). There is also a possibility he didn't pick up though...since a couple of Jorans cellphone numbers have been online (although I haven't seen the number we have of him online as of yet) he probably got a lot of calls and got a new number ;-)

      And (maybe old info; sorry!): Bram Moszkowicz will be on Pauw & Witteman tonight; concerning the possible civil case against Joran.

      i hear joran say: "ja, met joran" ("yes, this is joran")


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Bladerunner on March 05, 2008, 11:53:18 AM
      Jensen:

      The prosecutor asked you about that or he asked you about that?

      Beth:

      No, the prosecutor did not but a lead detective asked me within 48 hours of her disappearance, he asked me when I entered the Bubali police station, he said, he asked only one medical question, now I could see, I mean just one, he says 'does Natalee have a history of epilepsy or seizures?' and I was like 'no' and then let's move on

      Jensen:

      Right, so the question is where did that come from?  

      Beth:

      Where did that come from? It's hard not to tie those two things togther. It's really hard not to put those two pieces together.  
      Jensen:

      It's interesting because what I've followed from you and also what you've put out in the american press, this is something that really caught your eye from this whole experience, this Peter R. de Vries undercover sting  
      Beth:

      That's it

      Jensen:

      That's it huh? This is a major thing  

      Beth:

      Yes

      Jensen:

      You were asked within 48 hours about that seizure and seizures, seizures, it almost sounds like this guy brings that up, so I mean, I'm just (inaudbile) he must have just mentioned that to somebody over there  
      Beth:

      Somebody because I was only asked that once but my husband at the time, Jug was asked at least, at least a dozen times by four different persons (inaudible) but we never really thought to much about it becuase we were just like 'please get them off that and get back on

      Jensen

      the case

      Beth:

      (inaudible) so it didn't make any, it didn't really, we didn't really have any red flags

      Jensen:

      So perhaps Joran confessed to somebody there. Let me show you another clip because it's just so obvious where, that he's lying, that he's lying but it says so much about the person, it's so weird. This is about the shoe incident, that's a big thing. How many stories did he tell about this, about 22 or something? Leaving the shoes on the beach

      WAKE UP ARUBA

      THE TRUTH IS OUT

      LET'S GO MOS WHERE ARE THE CHARGES?


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Tamikosmom on March 05, 2008, 11:56:21 AM
      Posted by Heli at RU:

      The Jensen Show
      RTL - The Netherlands
      March 5, 2008

      Guest: Beth Holloway

      Transcribed from audio files provided by Abarth

      Part I

      Beth:

      If I have to look at everything about that interview with Joran and when he's talking to Patrick, the part where I really want to come through and I really just want to kill him Robert and I mean when he imitates her, when he imitates her, when he imitates her actions as she's suffering. I'm thinking 'what, what a sick sonofabitch'. I'm sorry but I mean you know, how could, I mean, I mean, I think that's what really brings it all to the truth for me is, it's just not him, it's just his verbalization of what she's doing but he imitates her with this body action.

      Jensen:

      I understand because I mean those are kind of rough words, I mean what you're saying about wanting to kill him but I understand. I mean it's a natural way, a natural anger in a way, because I also because, I want to show you something because I had the Goldman family on the show, you know the parents of the guy O.J. Simpson killed

      Beth:

      Yeah, yeah

      Jensen:

      They are exactly, well they're in a similar position as you are

      Beth:

      Right

      Jensen:

      I don't know if you've ever met them?

      Beth:

      I've spoken with Denise, Nicole Brown Simpson's sister and I'll be honest Robert, I think about them a lot when I think about Natalee's case because I think here they're having to do the same thing.

      Jensen:

      I mean O.J., he got away and we all know it's obvious that he killed their son and I want to show you something because the way they go about life nowadays, and I respect that I applaud that; I mean some people will say it's vindictive but it's not, it's just you know, you don't want the killer as they call O.J. or the person who perpetrated this

      Beth:

      Yes, yes

      Jensen:

      you don't want them to get away; even if he's not in jail, you want to make his life a living hell when he's still walking amongst us and I want to show you just this clip of the Goldmans.

      (play videoclip)

      There are similarities aren't there Beth?

      Beth:

      Yeah there are and I think about them a lot Robert, everyday that I've tried to, because some days you really struggle with the bitterness and it's you know, it's hard to remain, as far as optimistic about the future and reaching out to thers and that's really what I'm trying to do. I'm really trying to continue that mission of reaching out to others and making a difference but you know, it's hard some days and you just want to give in to that but when I think about people like you know, I think about them and I draw a lot of strength from them that if they can continue this and knowing full well who their loved one's perpetrator was, then I can too.

      Jensen:

      Yeah, I understand that. Another thing that's happened since you were last on, I couldn't believe it but actually Joran came on my show. He had put out this book and he wanted to promote it but he still, to come on my show. I know a lot about the case knowing you and so he came on my show and I went in, you know I said this to Peter R. de Vries last night, he was on the show, I said I just went in like you know, let's just start and talk; I wanted to talk to the guy like we were in a bar you know and I just waited for the moment I felt 'oh now he's being evasive, now he's dodging my questions, now he's starting to ' and that happened pretty quickly, I mean the whole incident, I mean 'how did you get from the beach to your house?' that's where it all started to become 'I don't know' he became like a magician, he pulled every string available to him, it sort of, it didn't make sense anymore but I want to show you a few things, but especially, we mixed it up with the tape from Peter R. de Vries, so his real confession

      Beth:

      Okay

      Jensen:

      If you look at this, we subtitled it for you so you understand what he said in Dutch. It's just horrible; I leaned on him pretty hard, I leaned on him pretty hard. You can see in his body language he's leaning forward because I felt 'you're hiding something' Let's just start here with the incident on the beach, what he said on my show and then what he said to Patrick.

      (play videotape)

      I'll put this out to everybody: where do you think he was telling the truth?

      Beth:

      Oh exactly, right there

      Jensen:

      Yeah

      Beth:

      Exactly at that moment and what's so, what's so really completely frustrating about this whole deal is when he says epileptic seizures, I can't tell you how many times we were asked that Robert, within 48 hours.

      Jensen:

      That is true, I've heard that, you have to elaborate on that

      Beth:

      Yeah

      Jensen:

      The prosecutor asked you about that or he asked you about that?  

      Beth:

      No, the prosecutor did not but a lead detective asked me within 48 hours of her disappearance, he asked me when I entered the Bubali police station, he said, he asked only one medical question, now I could see, I mean just one, he says 'does Natalee have a history of epilepsy or seizures?' and I was like 'no' and then let's move on

      Jensen:

      Right, so the question is where did that come from?

      Beth:

      Where did that come from? It's hard not to tie those two things togther. It's really hard not to put those two pieces together.

      Jensen:

      It's interesting because what I've followed from you and also what you've put out in the american press, this is something that really caught your eye from this whole experience, this Peter R. de Vries undercover sting

      Beth:

      That's it

      Jensen:

      That's it huh? This is a major thing

      Beth:

      Yes  

      Jensen:

      You were asked within 48 hours about that seizure and seizures, seizures, it almost sounds like this guy brings that up, so I mean, I'm just (inaudbile) he must have just mentioned that to somebody over there  

      Beth:

      Somebody because I was only asked that once but my husband at the time, Jug was asked at least, at least a dozen times by four different persons (inaudible) but we never really thought to much about it becuase we were just like 'please get them off that and get back on  

      Jensen

      the case

      Beth:

      (inaudible) so it didn't make any, it didn't really, we didn't really have any red flags

      Jensen:

      So perhaps Joran confessed to somebody there. Let me show you another clip because it's just so obvious where, that he's lying, that he's lying but it says so much about the person, it's so weird. This is about the shoe incident, that's a big thing. How many stories did he tell about this, about 22 or something? Leaving the shoes on the beach

      Beth:

      Yeah, yeah, the shoe was, yeah

      Jensen:

      Take a look at this Beth, this is unbelievable

      (play videoclip)

      Bet this drove you absolutely crazy didn't it during the investigation?

      Beth:

      Yes

      Jensen:

      Him just changing his story and lying, knowing that he lies all the time, and not getting to the truth, not owning up to anything

      Beth:

      God, don't you know the interrogators want to get hold of him, I mean the things he did to them by just toying with them, he would stick his fingers in his ears during the interrogation and just smile, don't you know they just wanted to just grab him and

      Jensen:

      Just think of the psyche of the person I mean, knowing all that, knowing you did all that and then writing a book about it

      Beth:

      I know

      Jensen:

      So I want to show you what he told me about why he wrote the book, I couldn't understand why he would do it, but this is what he told me an the real reason follows

      (play videoclip)

      * long sigh from Jensen *

      Beth:

      Yeah, yeah

      Jensen:

      What do you make of that?

      Beth:

      He just wants to see how he can benefit from it or what he can profit from, golly I tell you what, he is truly just taking anyone he could for a ride

      Jensen:

      Yeah, he has

      Beth:

      He really did, yeah

      Jensen:

      It's unbelievable. Finally my final clip and I want to show this. I think this was the worse thing for me, the way I interpreted it he doesn't feel guilty at all

      Beth:

      Yeah

      Jensen:

      After he went to bed that night, didn't lose a minute of sleep over it, can you believe that Beth? Let's take a look

      (play videoclip)

      He really doesn't care, he really doesn't care

      Beth:

      No, he doesn't


      Thank you Klaas for bringing over the translated transcript.  Thank you Heli.

      Obviously ... Joran must have revealed that Natalee had "seizures" in his May 31, 2005 statement.  However ... Hans Mos once again comes to Joran's defence.

      Janet

      +++++++++++

      John Kelly
      On the Record w/ Greta
      February 20, 2008


      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Twi7-8OqS4
       
      KELLY:  Let me throw one more thing in on that Greta.  On May 31st, Joran was the first person interviewed by Jacobs when he's taking statements. Every police report subsequent to that, the statements made by Deepak, made by Satish, made by Beth that day, we have them all, there is no statement from Joran until June 9th.
      Transcript: Heli (RU)


      Beth Holloway
      DATELINE
      February 23, 2008


      http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23301056/page/6/

      Beth Holloway: The facts are within 48 hours of Natalee's disappearance, a lead detective asked me if she had a history of epilepsy or seizures. Two and a half years later, the main suspect himself, admits that Natalee -- he felt as if she suffered an epilepsy or seizure. And he even indicates how she's shaking. So, if we look at just that one-- just that one piece, that's one thread out of a lot. Then, I have to say yes, there definitely was some collusion and corruption going on in the early days of Natalee's disappearance. Absolutely.
       
      However, according to the prosecutor's office it's standard procedure to ask if a missing person might have a seizure disorder.  

      Police and prosecution officials declined on-camera interviews, but have consistently denied that there was any corruption, collusion or mishandling of the investigation.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Bladerunner on March 05, 2008, 12:03:46 PM
      I thought at the time when the "standard" quesion response came from Mos that he was full of crap. It's nonsensical to think that question would be asked. Maybe, just maybe you ask that question once and you get an answer of no and then you don't ask it ever again, but not a dozen or so times. The only reason you ask that so many times is that you are hoping, praying, that the answer is YES, so that you can find a way out of having to proceed with the unthinkable--which is disposing of a young girls body to protect the guilty!

      WE KNOW ARUBA


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: caesu on March 05, 2008, 12:04:17 PM
      it is good that this seizure thing is finally getting dutch attention.
      i hope peter r. can comment on this tonight at the jensen show.

      but maybe he won't, and use it in his next broadcast in detail together with all other things.

      telegraaf newspaper reported on this on feb 7th already:

      http://www.telegraaf.nl/binnenland/3238629/_Verdwijning_Natalee_cover-up_politie__.html?pageNumber=2

      228 comments on this article.

      (http://www.telegraaf.nl/multimedia/archive/00155/natauntitled1_155973i.jpg)
      Stiefvader Natalee vermoedt een cover-up van de Arubaanse politie
      Foto: Fox


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: GBMW on March 05, 2008, 12:11:19 PM


      I didn't hear Jorans voice; did you? I do think Joran would pick up the phone (because I think they used Patricks phone & of course he has his number in his memory) but would probably hang up the moment he would hear Robert Jensens voice. So hopefully Patrick is the one who does the talking ;-). There is also a possibility he didn't pick up though...since a couple of Jorans cellphone numbers have been online (although I haven't seen the number we have of him online as of yet) he probably got a lot of calls and got a new number ;-)

      And (maybe old info; sorry!): Bram Moszkowicz will be on Pauw & Witteman tonight; concerning the possible civil case against Joran.
      [/quote]

      i hear joran say: "ja, met joran" ("yes, this is joran")
      [/quote]

      Listened to it again; and I heard it now....thanks! It would have been interesting if Patrick would have called Joran without Jensen in between....


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: klaasend on March 05, 2008, 12:16:24 PM
      "ja, met joran" ("yes, this is joran and I am guilty") ::MonkeyHaHa::


      (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/JoranBobbleHead2.gif)


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Tamikosmom on March 05, 2008, 12:20:42 PM
      Posted on the front page of SM:

      EURobert wrote:

      Summary of the most important parts of the Jensen interview with PRdeVries from 03-03.

      http://tinyurl.com/326nc9

      PRdeVries (edited): When we started the show (with Patrick) the case actually was closed and Joran thought ‘he was off the hook’, and he was about to claim a damage-compensation. Now the investigation is reopened and behind the screen people work VERY hard on it ‘I know that from sources close to the case’. JORAN NOW OFFICIALLY IS SUSPECTED OF MURDER!

      Jensen about interview with Joran (edited): I went into that interview unprepared, as if I was talking to someone in a bar. But I clearly noticed when he started to hesitate and turn, starting at the question: how did you get from the beach to your home. I told him straight forward: you know more of this case. Then Joran looked at me with his ’stone-hard’ eyes, ‘glass-hard’-eyes and said: No Jensen, that’s really not so, that’s really not so’. After the show I asked the public: ‘What do you think?’. And 99% of the audience thought he knew more of what happened.

      Peter (edited): A year and a half ago I’d done a show on this subject. And already then I thought: Joran vd Sloot you know more of this thing, you don’t tell the truth, you hide things. And you can’t give answers to the most simple questions. And an innocent person doesn’t have to call for his right to remain silent. And when you’re innocent you want to say the truth ten times over!

      Jensen (edited): At Pauw en Witteman you constantly looked at him and thought ‘you’re a liar, you’re a liar’. And he felt that constantly because of which he snapped. You know with the wine and so on… And your wife made that clever remark about Joran to Anita: “Well, you brought that up right!” (Fragment of wine incident.) And she right away threw a glass of water at Joran, didn’t she?

      Peter (ed.): Yes off course… What he can, she can do as well. LOL It all was a reaction on the fact that Anita throughout the show claimed ‘Joran was a d-e-c-e-n-t guy’ (…).

      Jensen(ed.): I have the feeling those people absolutely don’t have any control over this guy anymore.

      Peter (ed.): I have the impression that the parents don’t know half of what he’s all into. And it’s odd that they claim they would bring him to the police if they only had the smallest idea of him having something to do with it. Well, untill today I haven’t seen anything of that! LOL Even after my sting operation they don’t tell him to finally tell the truth.



      Thank you Klaas.  Thank you Robert.

      I missed where Joran was once again declared a suspect.  At the end of December, 2007 ... Joran, Deepak and Satish were released from suspect status and ... the recent statement from the Prosecutor's Office following the Peter Devries video recording eludes to Joran NOT being a suspect.  That is my understanding.

      Would somebody please help me out?  When was Joran again declared a suspect?

      Thank you.

      Janet

      ++++++++++

      http://gretawire.foxnews.com/2008/02/08/press-release-from-prosecutor-in-aruba-question-to-you/

      press release
      Postbus 1163, Oranjestad, Aruba ,
      Havenstraat 2

      Oranjestad, Aruba
      To all media
      From the Public Prosecutor’s Office
      Date February 8, 2008
      Pages 1

      J.v.d.S. interrogated at Police Station in Rotterdam


      This morning, between 10:00 – 12:30 hours (Netherlands time) the police interrogated J.v.d.S. at a police station in Rotterdam. J.v.d.S. was interrogated by police officers of the Aruban Police Department and the Netherlands National Police Department. His lawyer was present during the interrogation, which lasted about two hours.

      During the interrogation J.v.d.S. indicated that during the conversations he had in the car he was under the influence of marihuana. Furthermore, he sticks to his statements made earlier during the investigation. He denies to have anything to do with the disappearance of Natalee Holloway.

      The decision of the Court of Appeal of the Netherlands Antilles and Aruba is crucial to the possibility of further interrogations of J.v.d.S.

      As already stated on February 5, 2008, the Public Prosecutor’s Office lodged an appeal against the decision of the investigating judge to deny the re-detention of J.v.d.S.. The decision of the Court of Appeal is not expected until after the weekend.

      Under the direction of the Public Prosecutor’s Office, the Aruban Police Department is still investigating this case. In the interest of the investigation, the Public Prosecutor’s Office appeals to the press to please refrain from a witch-hunt or private investigations or fishing expeditions (all this in the broadest sense of the word),

      The Public Prosecutor’s Office doesn’t fail to notice that the investigation into the disappearance of Natalee Holloway draws a lot of interest from media and general public. However, this interest seems to be turning into a witch-hunt in which several persons are being harassed.

      The Public Prosecutor’s Office regards this as not acceptable. In the first place, without any confirmation persons are being labeled as a suspect, and harassed as such. In the second place, journalistic investigations and the subsequent reporting thereof, at a time the investigative team is still busy trying to get an answer to many questions, can seriously harm the criminal investigation. Not only does it cause a lot of unrest, or may generate misinformation, it may also harm the outcome of the investigation itself, e.g. when witnesses questioned by the judge at trial can’t be sure if they witnessed something themselves or they know a fact from the media.

      Without questioning the value of freedom of the press, it would be desirable if the press would act a little distantly for aforementioned reasons.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: private eye on March 05, 2008, 12:24:47 PM
      Hey Anita, when is Paulus going to play sex with the dead with your other 2 boys. I am sure they want a turn. Have you ever thought about just buying them a blow up doll. they just lay there as well and you don't even have to buy them any drugs or drinks:) Of course you also have rentahoe so


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: GBMW on March 05, 2008, 12:27:46 PM


      Thank you Klaas.  Thank you Robert.

      I missed where Joran was once again declared a suspect.  At the end of December, 2007 ... Joran, Deepak and Satish were released from suspect status and ... the recent statement from the Prosecutor's Office following the Peter Devries video recording eludes to Joran NOT being a suspect.  That is my understanding.

      Would somebody please help me out?  When was Joran again declared a suspect?

      Thank you.

      Janet

      A small part from an ANP-message from the 4th of February:

            Uit het beeldmateriaal heeft justitie opgemaakt dat verdachte
      Van der Sloot niet weet of het meisje nog leefde, toen ze overboord
      werd gezet. Mos: ,,Daardoor beschouwen we hem ook als
      moordverdachte.


      From the footage it was made clear for the justicedepartment that Van der Sloot didn't know if the girl was alive, when she was thrown overboard. Mos: "Because of that we do look at him as a murdersuspect"




      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Jo-An on March 05, 2008, 12:28:19 PM

      **snippitysnip**

      Would somebody please help me out?  When was Joran again declared a suspect?

      Thank you.

      Janet


      After PRDV's confession tapes the case was reopened and Joran was a murdersuspect again.
      They are still working very hard behind the scenes, as Peter also confirmed during Jensen's show last Monday.
      Peter is very convinced this will go to trial.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: private eye on March 05, 2008, 12:28:57 PM
      "ja, met joran" ("yes, this is joran and I am guilty") ::MonkeyHaHa::


      (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/JoranBobbleHead2.gif)



      He is a pos:)


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: private eye on March 05, 2008, 12:31:23 PM
      Posted on the front page of SM:

      EURobert wrote:

      Summary of the most important parts of the Jensen interview with PRdeVries from 03-03.

      http://tinyurl.com/326nc9

      PRdeVries (edited): When we started the show (with Patrick) the case actually was closed and Joran thought ‘he was off the hook’, and he was about to claim a damage-compensation. Now the investigation is reopened and behind the screen people work VERY hard on it ‘I know that from sources close to the case’. JORAN NOW OFFICIALLY IS SUSPECTED OF MURDER!

      Jensen about interview with Joran (edited): I went into that interview unprepared, as if I was talking to someone in a bar. But I clearly noticed when he started to hesitate and turn, starting at the question: how did you get from the beach to your home. I told him straight forward: you know more of this case. Then Joran looked at me with his ’stone-hard’ eyes, ‘glass-hard’-eyes and said: No Jensen, that’s really not so, that’s really not so’. After the show I asked the public: ‘What do you think?’. And 99% of the audience thought he knew more of what happened.

      Peter (edited): A year and a half ago I’d done a show on this subject. And already then I thought: Joran vd Sloot you know more of this thing, you don’t tell the truth, you hide things. And you can’t give answers to the most simple questions. And an innocent person doesn’t have to call for his right to remain silent. And when you’re innocent you want to say the truth ten times over!

      Jensen (edited): At Pauw en Witteman you constantly looked at him and thought ‘you’re a liar, you’re a liar’. And he felt that constantly because of which he snapped. You know with the wine and so on… And your wife made that clever remark about Joran to Anita: “Well, you brought that up right!” (Fragment of wine incident.) And she right away threw a glass of water at Joran, didn’t she?

      Peter (ed.): Yes off course… What he can, she can do as well. LOL It all was a reaction on the fact that Anita throughout the show claimed ‘Joran was a d-e-c-e-n-t guy’ (…).

      Jensen(ed.): I have the feeling those people absolutely don’t have any control over this guy anymore.

      Peter (ed.): I have the impression that the parents don’t know half of what he’s all into. And it’s odd that they claim they would bring him to the police if they only had the smallest idea of him having something to do with it. Well, untill today I haven’t seen anything of that! LOL Even after my sting operation they don’t tell him to finally tell the truth.



      Thank you Klaas.  Thank you Robert.

      I missed where Joran was once again declared a suspect.  At the end of December, 2007 ... Joran, Deepak and Satish were released from suspect status and ... the recent statement from the Prosecutor's Office following the Peter Devries video recording eludes to Joran NOT being a suspect.  That is my understanding.

      Would somebody please help me out?  When was Joran again declared a suspect?

      Thank you.

      Janet

      ++++++++++

      http://gretawire.foxnews.com/2008/02/08/press-release-from-prosecutor-in-aruba-question-to-you/

      press release
      Postbus 1163, Oranjestad, Aruba ,
      Havenstraat 2

      Oranjestad, Aruba
      To all media
      From the Public Prosecutor’s Office
      Date February 8, 2008
      Pages 1

      J.v.d.S. interrogated at Police Station in Rotterdam


      This morning, between 10:00 – 12:30 hours (Netherlands time) the police interrogated J.v.d.S. at a police station in Rotterdam. J.v.d.S. was interrogated by police officers of the Aruban Police Department and the Netherlands National Police Department. His lawyer was present during the interrogation, which lasted about two hours.

      During the interrogation J.v.d.S. indicated that during the conversations he had in the car he was under the influence of marihuana. Furthermore, he sticks to his statements made earlier during the investigation. He denies to have anything to do with the disappearance of Natalee Holloway.

      The decision of the Court of Appeal of the Netherlands Antilles and Aruba is crucial to the possibility of further interrogations of J.v.d.S.

      As already stated on February 5, 2008, the Public Prosecutor’s Office lodged an appeal against the decision of the investigating judge to deny the re-detention of J.v.d.S.. The decision of the Court of Appeal is not expected until after the weekend.

      Under the direction of the Public Prosecutor’s Office, the Aruban Police Department is still investigating this case. In the interest of the investigation, the Public Prosecutor’s Office appeals to the press to please refrain from a witch-hunt or private investigations or fishing expeditions (all this in the broadest sense of the word),

      The Public Prosecutor’s Office doesn’t fail to notice that the investigation into the disappearance of Natalee Holloway draws a lot of interest from media and general public. However, this interest seems to be turning into a witch-hunt in which several persons are being harassed.

      The Public Prosecutor’s Office regards this as not acceptable. In the first place, without any confirmation persons are being labeled as a suspect, and harassed as such. In the second place, journalistic investigations and the subsequent reporting thereof, at a time the investigative team is still busy trying to get an answer to many questions, can seriously harm the criminal investigation. Not only does it cause a lot of unrest, or may generate misinformation, it may also harm the outcome of the investigation itself, e.g. when witnesses questioned by the judge at trial can’t be sure if they witnessed something themselves or they know a fact from the media.

      Without questioning the value of freedom of the press, it would be desirable if the press would act a little distantly for aforementioned reasons.

      Mos why don't you quit bitching and moaning and get up off of your sorry ass and investigate this cae. Use the findings of the media, you sure haven't been able to find anything on your own.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: private eye on March 05, 2008, 12:32:18 PM
      My way of saying Janet is right:)


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: private eye on March 05, 2008, 12:33:32 PM
      "ja, met joran" ("yes, this is joran and I am guilty") ::MonkeyHaHa::


      (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/JoranBobbleHead2.gif)



      He is a pos:)

      but i love him as a bobble head:)


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Tamikosmom on March 05, 2008, 12:33:34 PM
      "ja, met joran" ("yes, this is joran and I am guilty") ::MonkeyHaHa::


      (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/JoranBobbleHead2.gif)


      JUDGE:  Joran ... your confession ... "I AM GUILTY" ... cannot be believed.  You are a liar and ... liars with connections are given a free pass through the manipulation of Dutch law.

      +++++++++++

      Gerold Dompig
      'Rita Cosby Live & Direct'
      October 14, 2005


      http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9727957/

      COSBY: Now, did Joran—we‘ve heard from the family, Chief, that—you know, that Joran was claiming in some statement that she was going in and out of consciousness. Have you seen that anywhere?

      DOMPIG: Yes. That’s definitely in the statements, and that‘s why we were kind of disappointed when the judge didn‘t accept that because that‘s basically a Felony in Aruba. We think that what happened was that the judge just didn‘t buy it the way—because Joran went back and forth with his statements, and he withdrew two statements which he had already given to us. So basically, none of his statements were really trustworthy.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Anna on March 05, 2008, 12:37:39 PM
      Private Eye,

      Has your Evil Twin been posting on your computer again this morning?

      j/k

       ::MonkeyHaHa::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Tamikosmom on March 05, 2008, 12:38:25 PM


      Thank you Klaas.  Thank you Robert.

      I missed where Joran was once again declared a suspect.  At the end of December, 2007 ... Joran, Deepak and Satish were released from suspect status and ... the recent statement from the Prosecutor's Office following the Peter Devries video recording eludes to Joran NOT being a suspect.  That is my understanding.

      Would somebody please help me out?  When was Joran again declared a suspect?

      Thank you.

      Janet

      A small part from an ANP-message from the 4th of February:

            Uit het beeldmateriaal heeft justitie opgemaakt dat verdachte
      Van der Sloot niet weet of het meisje nog leefde, toen ze overboord
      werd gezet. Mos: ,,Daardoor beschouwen we hem ook als
      moordverdachte.


      From the footage it was made clear for the justicedepartment that Van der Sloot didn't know if the girl was alive, when she was thrown overboard. Mos: "Because of that we do look at him as a murdersuspect"


      Thank you GBMW.

      Janet


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Nut44x4 on March 05, 2008, 12:38:35 PM
      Glenda Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2008 9:34 am   
      I'm under the impression that Patrick called Joran with caller ID'd blocked. Joran answered, once he knew who it was, he hung up.

      I don't really have a source for this... I'm just making it up. 


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Tamikosmom on March 05, 2008, 12:57:26 PM
      I thought at the time when the "standard" quesion response came from Mos that he was full of crap. It's nonsensical to think that question would be asked. Maybe, just maybe you ask that question once and you get an answer of no and then you don't ask it ever again, but not a dozen or so times. The only reason you ask that so many times is that you are hoping, praying, that the answer is YES, so that you can find a way out of having to proceed with the unthinkable--which is disposing of a young girls body to protect the guilty!

      WE KNOW ARUBA

      Blade ... your words should reflect the words that the prosecutor.  After all .. he is suppose to be an advocate for the victim.

      However ... Hans Mos overlooks that the issue of "seizures" was presented to Jug and Beth several times in their intitial respective interrogations and ... defends the actions of the ALE.

      It is only Jug, Beth and America that recognizes the connection between Joran's May 31, 2005 statement and ... the questions by interrogators to Natalee's mother and stepfather in regards to "seizures".

      Janet

      ++++++++++

      Beth Holloway
      On the Record w/ Greta
      February 7, 2008


      http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,329348,00.html
       
      HOLLOWAY: I couldn't believe it because, I mean, it was so stunning, it was so stunning that I was hearing these words that Joran was saying because two- and-a-half years ago, gosh, Greta, within 48 hours of Natalee's disappearance — 48 hours — the lead detective, Dennis Jacobs, came to me in the Bubali (ph) police station and says, Does Natalee have a history of epilepsy or seizures? And I thought, No, why are you asking that? And he did it — they did it repeatedly to Jug. And when I was hearing that, it just — it just felt like it brought everything full circle of what we had been fighting for.
       
       
      Beth Holloway
      CNN - LARRY KING LIVE
      February 7, 2008


      http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0802/07/lkl.01.html
       
      HOLLOWAY: Well, Larry, I think that a lot of people have kind of stepped into this tangled web, into Joran's web, well into this journey, and we -- we have a lot of thing that were transpiring early on in the island of Aruba, within the first 48 hours of Natalee's disappearance, and had a stunning revelation when I was watching the taped admissions of Joran to Patrick. And, when he imitates how Natalee was suffering through the seizures, well, Larry, within 48 hours of Natalee's disappearance on the island of Aruba, a lead detective, Dennis Jacobs (ph), first and only medical question he asked me was, does Natalee have a history of epilepsy or seizures. And I said, no, why would you ask that?

      And he only asked me that once, and from there forward, three other detectives asked Natalee's step father probably a dozen times, Larry. Jug had to come to me six times and ask me if Natalee had a history of epilepsy or seizure. And I kept saying no, why do you keep asking us that? Why? So, it brought it full circle for us.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: mojo on March 05, 2008, 01:00:57 PM
      Glenda Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2008 9:34 am   
      I'm under the impression that Patrick called Joran with caller ID'd blocked. Joran answered, once he knew who it was, he hung up.

      I don't really have a source for this... I'm just making it up. 


      so what else is new?


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: caesu on March 05, 2008, 01:07:37 PM
      Quote
      'De Beth die ik was, is er niet meer'

      door Jacqueline Steenwijk

      Woensdag 5 maart 2008 - De manier waarop Joran van der Sloot op band imiteerde hoe Natalee Holloway lag te schokken in zijn armen, staat in het geheugen van moeder Beth Holloway gegrift. 'Hoe gruwelijk het ook was, het is dankzij dat beeld, dat ik eindelijk rust kan vinden. Natalee is dood.'

      "Toen ik dat zag, wist ik dat hij de waarheid vertelde. Je kunt met woorden liegen, maar niet tegelijkertijd met je lichaam. En het maakte één ding duidelijk: Dit had hij al eerder tegen iemand verteld. Waarom vroeg de politie van Aruba anders na 48 uur al aan mij of Natalee aan epilepsie leed?"

      http://www.bndestem.nl/algemeen/binnenland/2761893/De-Beth-die-ik-was-is-er-niet-meer.ece

      the seizures are also mentioned in this interview with Beth.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Keepthefaith on March 05, 2008, 01:07:39 PM
      "ja, met joran" ("yes, this is joran and I am guilty") ::MonkeyHaHa::


      (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/JoranBobbleHead2.gif)


      One day i hope to see Paulus(Chief) helping Joran(Mcmurphy after the labotomy from Ratched)Escaping from the Psych Ward photo displayed on the front page.Bet you could sell some posters.Ohh.That's copywrited.that sucks...Go Klass.... ::MonkeyDance::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Anna on March 05, 2008, 01:14:32 PM
      Ditch Posters, help me out here.  I was told early on that the role of Prosecutor is to represent JUSTICE and that the Prosecutor is to remain neutral, neither an advocate for the victim nor the defendant but only justice.

      The law itself is supposed to represent the victim.  The suspect has defense attorneys and the Prosecutor interprets if a crime was committed applying the principles of the law in a neutral manner.

      This could be why it is so difficult to get a conviction under this system if this is true.

      .


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Tamikosmom on March 05, 2008, 01:15:31 PM
      My way of saying Janet is right:)

       ::MonkeyShocked::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Anna on March 05, 2008, 01:17:37 PM
      Ditch Posters, help me out here.  I was told early on that the role of Prosecutor is to represent JUSTICE and that the Prosecutor is to remain neutral, neither an advocate for the victim nor the defendant but only justice.

      The law itself is supposed to represent the victim.  The suspect has defense attorneys and the Prosecutor interprets if a crime was committed applying the principles of the law in a neutral manner.

      This could be why it is so difficult to get a conviction under this system if this is true.

      .


      Edit Ditch to DUTCH, lol, sorry guys!  Guess who I am thinking about this morning!



      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: katrien on March 05, 2008, 01:25:03 PM
       
        "5 maart 2008
       Vanavond in Pauw & Witteman: Bram Moszkowicz, Sanderijn Cels en Jan Pronk".

      So Bram Moszkowicz will be present toning at 22.05 (RTL5) in the Jensen show (together with Beth Holloway, Peter R de Vries and Patrick v.d. Eem) and in the Pauw and Witteman show at 23.05 (Ned. 1). 




      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: klaasend on March 05, 2008, 01:29:15 PM
      NEW FRONT PAGE POST:

      http://scaredmonkeys.com/2008/03/05/natalee-holloway-missing-in-aruba-jvds-caption-contest-this-one-is-a-softball-go-at-it/

      Natalee Holloway Missing in Aruba … JVDS Caption Contest: This One is a Softball … Go at It


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: caesu on March 05, 2008, 01:30:02 PM
      Ditch Posters, help me out here.  I was told early on that the role of Prosecutor is to represent JUSTICE and that the Prosecutor is to remain neutral, neither an advocate for the victim nor the defendant but only justice.

      The law itself is supposed to represent the victim.  The suspect has defense attorneys and the Prosecutor interprets if a crime was committed applying the principles of the law in a neutral manner.

      This could be why it is so difficult to get a conviction under this system if this is true.

      .

      A public prosecutor is in the Netherlands a representative of the Public Prosecution Service (OM)
      The OM is responsible for tracing and continuing indictable offences.

      The most important roles of the public prosecutor are:
      * conduct the authority concerning investigations of the police force
      * directly give control at heavy indictable offences to investigations of the police force
      * act as public indicter in a lawsuit (criminal law)
      * ask for a certain sentence, which is not always imposed by the judge during a lawsuit.

      Both the police force and the public prosecutor can apply coercion resources.
      Often used coercion resources are for example a body search or detainment at the police station.

      The public prosecutor ascertains whether he wants present a matter to a judge or not.
      He must also ensure that judgements of the sentence judge are carried out.

      The public prosecutor must stick to strict rules in the law. The judge checks if the rules are, however, well applied.

      http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Officier_van_justitie


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: BUCKSHOT on March 05, 2008, 01:30:11 PM

      **snippitysnip**

      Would somebody please help me out?  When was Joran again declared a suspect?

      Thank you.

      Janet


      After PRDV's confession tapes the case was reopened and Joran was a murdersuspect again.
      They are still working very hard behind the scenes, as Peter also confirmed during Jensen's show last Monday.
      Peter is very convinced this will go to trial.

      They are still working very hard behind the scenes

      I bet they are..........................


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: EURobert on March 05, 2008, 01:31:35 PM
      Ditch Posters, help me out here.  I was told early on that the role of Prosecutor is to represent JUSTICE and that the Prosecutor is to remain neutral, neither an advocate for the victim nor the defendant but only justice.

      The law itself is supposed to represent the victim.  The suspect has defense attorneys and the Prosecutor interprets if a crime was committed applying the principles of the law in a neutral manner.

      This could be why it is so difficult to get a conviction under this system if this is true.

      .


      Edit Ditch to DUTCH, lol, sorry guys!  Guess who I am thinking about this morning!




      Hi Anna,

      In the Dutch system there are three parties:

      First: the judge/judges/court
      Next the prosecutor: who is has the police and forensic institute etc. to gather and present the evidence
      Third: the defendant and his (team of) lawyer(s)


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Anna on March 05, 2008, 01:34:51 PM
      Another thought I am having today is about things we have found, heard, seen in the news over the last two years and nine months.

      I love our archives and they explain why we might think what we think but they do not always represent facts.  They are what that person may or may not have believed at that point in time and are subject to revision, more information coming to light and interpretation.

      We know even sworn statements may contain incorrect information.  Just because was written somewhere at some time does not translate into being a fact.  It is just what it is, a statement by someone or something reported by someone at that time.

      I say this recalling an interview with a member of ALE very early.  I can't recall where I could find this written down but I suspect that it is or was at one time.

      Anyway, he said and I paraphrase:  At first we thought the American media were morons.  They couldn't get anything wrong and then I decided to give him (meaning Geraldo from memory) some false information so as to discredit him.  I thought that then no one would listen to him and he would go away.

      We are not accustomed to this tactic in this country and would expect, unless part of a sting operation, LE to either tell the truth or use the no comment option.

      That evidently was not always the case in the disappearance of Natalee.  We have to take everything with the proverbial grain of salt and in context of what someone said at the time.

      That's why we can't make a timeline or list of known facts.  Becomes subjective almost immediately on to whom does one believe.  Multiple sources, witnesses all saying the same thing are always good but how often do we have that?

      Goes back to Natalee seen leaving in the car with the suspects as the only well-established fact.  After that, it is all fuzzy because of even official sources, or what should have been official, giving wrong information.

      jmo and something we might want to keep in mind throughout this.



      .


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: caesu on March 05, 2008, 01:38:22 PM
      Ditch Posters, help me out here.  I was told early on that the role of Prosecutor is to represent JUSTICE and that the Prosecutor is to remain neutral, neither an advocate for the victim nor the defendant but only justice.

      The law itself is supposed to represent the victim.  The suspect has defense attorneys and the Prosecutor interprets if a crime was committed applying the principles of the law in a neutral manner.

      This could be why it is so difficult to get a conviction under this system if this is true.

      .

      A public prosecutor is in the Netherlands a representative of the Public Prosecution Service (OM)
      The OM is responsible for tracing and continuing prosecuting indictable offences.

      The most important roles of the public prosecutor are:
      * conduct the authority concerning investigations of the police force
      * directly give control at heavy indictable offences to investigations of the police force
      * act as public indicter in a lawsuit (criminal law)
      * ask for a certain sentence, which is not always imposed by the judge during a lawsuit.

      Both the police force and the public prosecutor can apply coercion resources.
      Often used coercion resources are for example a body search or detainment at the police station.

      The public prosecutor ascertains whether he wants present a matter to a judge or not.
      He must also ensure that judgements of the sentence judge are carried out.

      The public prosecutor must stick to strict rules in the law. The judge checks if the rules are, however, well applied.

      http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Officier_van_justitie

      correction:
      'continuing' must be 'prosecuting'


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: BUCKSHOT on March 05, 2008, 01:39:52 PM
      Hans Mos was hired to handle the media.
      Han Mos was not hired to solve and/or prosecute the case.

      Joran VanderSloot has been declared a murder suspect, indefinitely.

      They will investigate the crime for the rest of their lives, to no avail.

      The case files can never be shared with anyone, because it would compromise the ongoing investigation.

      The case will never be strong enough to prosecute.

      There will never be enough evidence to re-arrest Joran VanderSloot.

      Dennis Jacobs, JanVanderSraaten, PaulusVanderSloot, JudgeWit had a meeting. They re-wrote Aruban law so as to accomodate this case.

      THE END !!!!  ::MonkeyConfused::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Anna on March 05, 2008, 01:40:33 PM
      But would you say the Prosecutor is an advocate for the victim or a neutral party.

      Point of concern, why would the Prosecutor say he would protect Joran from the mob if necessary if he is advocate for the victim only?

      This is confusing.  Does he represent justice or does he speak for the victim only under this systyem?

      .


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: klaasend on March 05, 2008, 01:42:44 PM
      Holloway key players on tv chat show
      Wednesday 05 March 2008

      A number of key players in the Natalee Holloway disappearance are set to appear on tv chat show Jensen on Wednesday night, broadcasting company RTL5 said.

      Dutch lawyer Bram Moszkowicz, tv crime reporter Peter R de Vries, Holloway's mother Beth Twitty and Patrick van der Eem are all booked as guests. Twitty also appeared on Tuesday evening.

      According to the Volkskrant, Van der Eem, who befriended suspect Joran van der Sloot and helped secretly record him confessing to his role in Natalee's disappearance, will telephone the Dutch student live on air.

      http://www.dutchnews.nl/news/archives/2008/03/holloway_key_players_on_tv_cha.php


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Peaches on March 05, 2008, 01:43:29 PM
      My way of saying Janet is right:)

      You catch on quick, PI.  Janet is very often right and can show you the link to boot!

      Janet is a wealth of knowledge and documentation.  I am envious of her organizational skills.  Thank you Janet for keeping all this stuff together for those of us who can't.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Anna on March 05, 2008, 01:45:03 PM
      Does Joran actually talk to Patrick I wonder or does he just hang up on him?


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Anna on March 05, 2008, 01:46:43 PM
      My way of saying Janet is right:)

      You catch on quick, PI.  Janet is very often right and can show you the link to boot!

      Janet is a wealth of knowledge and documentation.  I am envious of her organizational skills.  Thank you Janet for keeping all this stuff together for those of us who can't.


      Yes, I designate Janet and PITA and vms Official Historians.  I am sure there are some others I have left out but their wealth of archival history is just fantastic.

      .


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: caesu on March 05, 2008, 01:52:24 PM
      But would you say the Prosecutor is an advocate for the victim or a neutral party.

      Point of concern, why would the Prosecutor say he would protect Joran from the mob if necessary if he is advocate for the victim only?

      This is confusing.  Does he represent justice or does he speak for the victim only under this systyem?

      .

      yes, that's shouldn't really be his concern, the security of joran.
      only after a mob targets joran he has to prosecute the mob.

      the security of joran is more the concern of the minister of the interior who heads the national police imo.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Tamikosmom on March 05, 2008, 01:52:49 PM
      Hans Mos was hired to handle the media.
      Han Mos was not hired to solve and/or prosecute the case.

      Joran VanderSloot has been declared a murder suspect, indefinitely.

      They will investigate the crime for the rest of their lives, to no avail.

      The case files can never be shared with anyone, because it would compromise the ongoing investigation.

      The case will never be strong enough to prosecute.

      There will never be enough evidence to re-arrest Joran VanderSloot.

      Dennis Jacobs, JanVanderSraaten, PaulusVanderSloot, JudgeWit had a meeting. They re-wrote Aruban law so as to accomodate this case.

      THE END !!!!  ::MonkeyConfused::

      I agree with everything you said Buckeye except "THE END!!!"  I believe with all my heart that justice will prevail for Natalee Holloway.

      Janet

      +++++++++++

      The best laid plans of mice and men go oft astray.
      Robert Burns


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Bladerunner on March 05, 2008, 01:53:10 PM
      Another thought I am having today is about things we have found, heard, seen in the news over the last two years and nine months.

      I love our archives and they explain why we might think what we think but they do not always represent facts.  They are what that person may or may not have believed at that point in time and are subject to revision, more information coming to light and interpretation.

      We know even sworn statements may contain incorrect information.  Just because was written somewhere at some time does not translate into being a fact.  It is just what it is, a statement by someone or something reported by someone at that time.

      I say this recalling an interview with a member of ALE very early.  I can't recall where I could find this written down but I suspect that it is or was at one time.

      Anyway, he said and I paraphrase:  At first we thought the American media were morons.  They couldn't get anything wrong and then I decided to give him (meaning Geraldo from memory) some false information so as to discredit him.  I thought that then no one would listen to him and he would go away.

      We are not accustomed to this tactic in this country and would expect, unless part of a sting operation, LE to either tell the truth or use the no comment option.

      That evidently was not always the case in the disappearance of Natalee.  We have to take everything with the proverbial grain of salt and in context of what someone said at the time.

      That's why we can't make a timeline or list of known facts.  Becomes subjective almost immediately on to whom does one believe.  Multiple sources, witnesses all saying the same thing are always good but how often do we have that?

      Goes back to Natalee seen leaving in the car with the suspects as the only well-established fact.  After that, it is all fuzzy because of even official sources, or what should have been official, giving wrong information.

      jmo and something we might want to keep in mind throughout this.



      .

      Yes, but there is a path of least resistance when it comes to the mountain of circumstantical evidence in this case. The goal is to navigate that path and fill in the blanks given our convictions of belief that somethings could or could not have happened. I surmise that the scenarios laid out here involving what happened have almost crystalized to the point that we have a relatively complete picture of events. There are gaps for sure, but any half azzed prosecutor could take what is here and build a very strong case to present to a judge--and I'm talking about both the initial crime and the cover-up that ensued.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Peaches on March 05, 2008, 01:55:54 PM
      "ja, met joran" ("yes, this is joran and I am guilty") ::MonkeyHaHa::


      (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/JoranBobbleHead2.gif)



      He is a pos:)

      but i love him as a bobble head:)

      I'd love him as a target but the neighbors would frown on my taking target practice with a pump shotgun....bummer....


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: klaasend on March 05, 2008, 02:04:08 PM
      http://www.amigoe.com/english/

      Unions give the government till Friday

      Police union SPA decided yesterday during a special meeting that they will also take part in the actions of SDU. 

      ORANJESTAD – The cooperating unions in the SDU have rejected the government’s new proposal to meet on March 10.  They have given the government more time though.  The government has till March 7 instead of March 4 to plan a deliberation.  If they don’t, there will be actions, said SDU.

      The employees of the National Lab, IPA, and Cadastre walked out today and other than the park rangers of the national part Arikok, also the personnel of Dak Riba Cabez and Traimerdia walked out yesterday.

      Simar announced actions for Friday, Monday, and Tuesday if the government does not meet SDU’s deadline.  Also SADA (customs personnel) received the mandate to joint in the actions.

      Premier Nelson Oduber (MEP), who at first said that the unions cannot just like that decide when to meet with the government, had sent SDU a new proposal for a meeting: Monday, March 10 at 11:30.  Moving the meeting date further up is not possible because the government does not have all the necessary data.  Oduber also calls on the unions to assume their social responsibility.



      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: klaasend on March 05, 2008, 02:06:41 PM
      http://www.amigoe.com/english/

      (http://www.amigoe.com/english/images/03-04-Drugs-op-schip.jpg)

      Aruba more and more important as transshipment location for drugs

      A huge amount of cocaine was intercepted on sea in February of 2007.  One huge catch can influence the statistics, but is not necessarily an indication for a certain tendency.

      ORANJESTAD – Aruba functions to an increasing extent as a transshipment location for drugs that find their way via airplane or cruise ship to the United States and to a smaller extent, to Europe, states the International Narcotics Control Strategy Report for 2007 of the International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs of the American State Department that was published last Saturday.   

      Aruba was only mentioned as transshipment location in the 2006 report.  According to the Bureau’s available data in the first 10 months of 2007, 390 kilo cocaine and 10 kilo heroine was intercepted.

      The 2005 report also mentioned the interception of marihuana and XTC-pills, but these are no longer mentioned in the 2006 and 2007 report.  An increasing use of xtc by the youth is observed in entertainment places.  The production of narcotics in Aruba is not enough to be mentioned in the report.  According to the 2007 report, the Aruban government is pursuing a ‘dynamic anti-drug policy’, in close cooperation with her regional and international partners.   

      Aruban justice has arrested and convicted a number of middlemen that delivered drugs to couriers.  The report doesn’t mention details or numbers.  Neither does the report mention the number of American citizens that tried to smuggle kilograms of drugs to the United States.   

      The 2006 and 2007 reports vaguely mentioned the expansion of the facilities for the Forward Operating Location (FOL) to use at the airport.  The FOL tries to locate drug transportation from the air with airplanes of the American Air Force and Customs Department.  The 2007 report doesn’t even mention that expansion or that it still exists.

      According to American justice, drug smuggling and its related money laundering practices and criminal violence continue to be a threat for Aruba and the Neth.Antilles.

      Extending the Judicial cooperation between the American, Dutch, Antillean, and Aruban governments can contribute to lowering that threat on the islands and also to a broader joint fight against the drug criminality in the Caribbean.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: bleachedblack on March 05, 2008, 02:09:29 PM

        "5 maart 2008
       Vanavond in Pauw & Witteman: Bram Moszkowicz, Sanderijn Cels en Jan Pronk".

      So Bram Moszkowicz will be present toning at 22.05 (RTL5) in the Jensen show (together with Beth Holloway, Peter R de Vries and Patrick v.d. Eem) and in the Pauw and Witteman show at 23.05 (Ned. 1). 




      Are there 2 famous lawyers last name Moszkowicz in the Netherlands? I notice
      A. Moszkowicz defended Eduardo Mathews, Bram Moszkowicz is retained by Beth?
      Just curious if anyone knows....TIA

      >>>SNIP
      Mr. Mathew has appealed his case and is currently awaiting the trial in the Supreme Court in the Netherlands and he is being represented by one of the best Attorneys in Europe Mr. A. Moszkowicz. Mr. Mathew also has a case against the Netherlands and Aruba in the European court of human rights and is being represented by Ms. J. Serrarens

      http://tinyurl.com/3cw3t8


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Tamikosmom on March 05, 2008, 02:11:22 PM
      My way of saying Janet is right:)

      You catch on quick, PI.  Janet is very often right and can show you the link to boot!

      Janet is a wealth of knowledge and documentation.  I am envious of her organizational skills.  Thank you Janet for keeping all this stuff together for those of us who can't.

      Peaches ... you are welcome and ... thank you!

      However ... I concede that that the massive backup quotes/links/articles that I have accumulated which are related to the Natalee Holloway case did not materialize out of a vacuum.  I have done hours of reading but ... much of my research has been derived from the research posts submitted by Natalee supporters to the Monkey cage and various Natalee forums that I have been associated with.  Along with the assistance of my Dutch American daughter-in-law ... I have attempted to organize the accumulated research and ... her husband (my youngest son) backs up my desktop files weekly. (I knew that God had a special purpose for this surprise package who came along when his siblings where in their mid and late teens.)

      Janet


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Anna on March 05, 2008, 02:11:24 PM
      BB,
      Could Bram be short for Abraham?


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Anna on March 05, 2008, 02:14:34 PM
      I thought Beth was tremendous in the Janssen Program and am looking forward to the second part.  Also the other talk show and then tomorrow the continuation of that assault on Patrick's character from Aruba.

      I think Beth is a stellar contrast for the Dutch people to see and would suggest they compare and contrast with Joran's performance on tape to Patrick.

      Off to work again. . . .


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: bleachedblack on March 05, 2008, 02:18:11 PM
      BB,
      Could Bram be short for Abraham?

      Could be, good thought.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: JE on March 05, 2008, 02:20:34 PM
      Moszkowicz is a lawyer family
      father: Max
      Sons: Abraham (Bram) there is also David, Max jr., and Robert


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: JE on March 05, 2008, 02:24:08 PM
      Moszkowicz is a lawyer family
      father: Max
      Sons: Abraham (Bram) there is also David, Max jr., and Robert

      forgot to add they re all lawyers


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Nut44x4 on March 05, 2008, 02:24:54 PM
      just trying to get to 50 :P


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: Nut44x4 on March 05, 2008, 02:25:34 PM
      oops, lmaoooo. Seeing double anyone?  ::MonkeyLaugh::


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: bleachedblack on March 05, 2008, 02:25:44 PM
      Moszkowicz is a lawyer family
      father: Max
      Sons: Abraham (Bram) there is also David, Max jr., and Robert

      forgot to add they re all lawyers

      Thank-you


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: katrien on March 05, 2008, 02:36:13 PM
      Beth Holloway is a victim of Renee Gielen, a reporter who writes terrible things about Beth. Of course it is not normal if someone starts a Mediacircus to tell lies about an innocent woman. Beth does not have to accept all the terrible things this Renee Gielen tells about her Natalee. On Witheet she placed one of her articles and on Geenstijl you can read other horrible things she writes about Natalee. I don't want to copy it here but there is enough reason to claim the people who write this, for it emotional damage done to Beth and her family.

      In Holland it happened before in a murdercase. The end is still not there.
      There was a woman murdered in a little town in Holland in 1999. From the guy who went to prison for it, loads of DNA was found on the blouse of the victim and there were also Y-chromosomes found under the nails of the victim.
      There was no DNA from someone else found, nothing, but the man kept blaming an innocent man.
      The police found much, much more evidence against the man who went to prison, but this is the Natalee forum and it is a  very long and complicated story. It was a setup.

      Anyway, the guy kept telling he was innocent and pointed to another man who was totally innocent.
      The guy who went to prison finally contacted a journalist and a mediaman.
      These people started a mediacampagne to blame the innocent guy and later also his girlfriend.

      I followed the case and the innocent man and his girlfriend went to horrible situations. People starting to behave terrible to this innocent man like trying to poison their dogs.
      They started to ask the mediaman to stop accusing him. The mediaman did not stop.

      The mediaman has to pay a lot of money now. But now he blames the police, the media, the politics, and the forensic institute (everybody) from fraud. This man is sick in the head.
      People who asked critical questions on his website were intimidated and computers were hacked.

      The journalist I am talking about in the above mentioned story, (he was one of the founders of the media-setup)  is the same journalist who wrote a terrible article about Patrick v.d. Eem and Peter R. de Vries. Besides that, I see the name of Renee Gielen turn up on the same sites this journalist is writing.

      Coincidence?

      If this Renee Gielen does not stop blaming the mother of Natalee, people will really start thinking that Natalee's mother and her family have something to do with the disappearance of Natalee.
      This woman is accusing and blaming Natalee, her mother and her familie without any evidence and besides that, what this woman is claiming is total crap.


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: klaasend on March 05, 2008, 02:41:07 PM
      Need to run out real quick - have to lock thread a bit early!


      (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/1LOCKED.gif)

      Please move to NCD# 740

      http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2673.0


      Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
      Post by: jackb on March 05, 2008, 02:41:49 PM
      I believe Jan Vanderstratten is as bad or worse than Palus Vandersloot.  Who is he to say he would arrest someone for "slandering" the population when he is about as criminal as anyone could get in more ways than one.  He needs to be behind bars with someone like Matthews.  That piece of gargbage thinks he is a dicataor over a whole country.  THERE IS NO GREATER EVIL IN THE LAND THAN INJUSTICE STANDING BEHIND THE BADGE OF THE LAW (a quote of Thurgood Marshall, I believe)  Jack

      i would like to think that mos has been sitting on both jacobs and van der stratten after devries and beth and jug's info about the seizure questions....seems to me, this whole thing needs to go straight back to the beginning of this so-called investigation and it starts with those two. 

      Word could have gotten back to the Vs from that PD where Patrick offered to do this. It is possible, but as someone just mentioned not on all the tape.  Palus probably found out about Joran's new friend and had him checked out.  It would not be unreasonable to think Palus had Joran followed or watched.  Joran did seem like he wanted to go into the dope business big time, so it stands to reason he may not be "big time" that way on the island anymore because of his mouth.  He probably thought he would set up shop in the NL were he was living.  Trying to get connections, etc.  It would be my guess he did think he had found him a "new best friend" at least for most of the tape and when Palus' watchdogs reported his new "best friend" Joran would not believe Palus until it started ringing true in about the last couple of sentences of what was shown on tv as to WHERE he had NH placed in the ocean.  I believe Joran almost told ALL of it to Patrick and then at the last decided to hedge on WHERE because he may not have known exactly or it hit him Patrick may have been gleaning infor from him and just in case decided not to mention the person's real name.  Their system is run by thugs and it is easier for the wicked to believe a lie than the truth. If that system goes down and the people are freed from the tyrrany of those "mob" like characters, I believe, as bad as this is NH would have been glad she helped free the decent people.  It will take years for the system to purge there even if it starts now.  That corruption runs deep, I am sure.       Jack blue