Scared Monkeys Discussion Forum

Natalee Holloway => LCD Archive => Topic started by: klaasend on March 05, 2008, 02:11:13 AM



Title: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 - 3/7/08
Post by: klaasend on March 05, 2008, 02:11:13 AM
http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/Natalee2.swf


JUSTICE FOR NATALEE


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: klaasend on March 05, 2008, 02:19:33 PM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/KingKongJoran3.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 05, 2008, 02:45:37 PM
RESERVED FOR ROBOTS!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Tater on March 05, 2008, 02:56:17 PM
Hi Monkey's,
  I was just wondering something.Does the ship seen on the Aru-bay video and the picture of this helicopter have anything at all in common?

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?action=profile;u=3707;sa=showPosts


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Anna on March 05, 2008, 03:01:50 PM
I had one other comment/question I wanted to post on the way out the door to do errands but wanted monkey thought on this.

I do so wish that Patrick had asked Joran why he threw away his shoes.  Here you have someone walking home on a rock scrabble island full of cacti in the DARK no less so what does he do?  He removes his shoes and tosses them into some drainage area.

What could have been so urgent he could not even finish his walk home in those shoes?  Now Joran is back in denial mode and will say he left them on the beach again but I so wish Patrick had asked him why he threw them away before he reverted back to his I am a tremendous liar mode.

What could have been on those shoes that required him to toss them?  He didn't say he lost them in the surf or muck but that on the way home, he purposely removed them.

Wet shoes dry, I know from experience especially tennis shoes even leather ones.  Vomit?  Could say Natalee threw up on him, poor Joran.  Vomit with GHB?  He could say he had not idea she had given herself such a drug.

Blood is the only thing I can think of that would be so bad he would not want to even finish walking home wearing those shoes.  Blood and Natalee's blood is the only one thing I can come up with that would require the immediate removal of the shoes, fear of being seen or caught with that on them and must have been showing for him to be desperate enough to walk home barefoot if that happened.

Even if it never happened and Paulus took him home, it would have been telling to hear his explanation for why he couldn't keep those shoes even long enough to get home in them.

.

A lawyer and his son whose hobby is criminal justice/how to get away with crimes would know not to track that around or have the shoes found later.

Just saying again. . . .

Off on errands but no matter what I am doing, my mind always wanders back to what happened to Natalee.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Tater on March 05, 2008, 03:02:28 PM
Oh I forgot lol,
   Does anyone know if the average Joe would be able to get close enough to the helicopter posted to video tape it? Never been there so wouldn't know.Kept in a hanger?Launch pad? I don't know,do you?Thanks.. :2notworthy:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Spock on March 05, 2008, 03:04:23 PM
We need to get this right:

No matter what Mos says Joran is no longer a suspect.

Joran was released as a suspect in December and can not be watched, listened to, or surveiled.

Until Joran is rearrested under suspision of a crime, he can not legally be a suspect.

Joran can not be rearrested until physical evidence or a verifiable witness can be found.

Joran is free of judicial suspision and is in no way a legal suspect.

Joran has not been charged with a crime and there is not and may never be a trial date.

The only effect on Joran is that he is a "persona non grata"


I dont agree with it but thats how it is, under their system.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: caesu on March 05, 2008, 03:07:09 PM
I had one other comment/question I wanted to post on the way out the door to do errands but wanted monkey thought on this.

I do so wish that Patrick had asked Joran why he threw away his shoes.  Here you have someone walking home on a rock scrabble island full of cacti in the DARK no less so what does he do?  He removes his shoes and tosses them into some drainage area.

What could have been so urgent he could not even finish his walk home in those shoes?  Now Joran is back in denial mode and will say he left them on the beach again but I so wish Patrick had asked him why he threw them away before he reverted back to his I am a tremendous liar mode.

What could have been on those shoes that required him to toss them?  He didn't say he lost them in the surf or muck but that on the way home, he purposely removed them.

Wet shoes dry, I know from experience especially tennis shoes even leather ones.  Vomit?  Could say Natalee threw up on him, poor Joran.  Vomit with GHB?  He could say he had not idea she had given herself such a drug.

Blood is the only thing I can think of that would be so bad he would not want to even finish walking home wearing those shoes.  Blood and Natalee's blood is the only one thing I can come up with that would require the immediate removal of the shoes, fear of being seen or caught with that on them and must have been showing for him to be desperate enough to walk home barefoot if that happened.

Even if it never happened and Paulus took him home, it would have been telling to hear his explanation for why he couldn't keep those shoes even long enough to get home in them.

.

A lawyer and his son whose hobby is criminal justice/how to get away with crimes would know not to track that around or have the shoes found later.

Just saying again. . . .

Off on errands but no matter what I am doing, my mind always wanders back to what happened to Natalee.

.

yes there are so many things patrick could have asked.

also why joran didn't call ambulance or just dropped her of in front of the emergency entrance at the hospital.
why dump her in the ocean? joran doesn't explain that to patrick.
(of course it is obvious why)

peter r. said that they decided not the stay in contact with patrick while he was driving.
not to make joran suspicous that patrick was spoken to while talking to joran.
remember patrick is not a professional interrogator / spy.
but he did prety good. i still want to see the 20 hours.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 05, 2008, 03:11:11 PM
Thought you monkeys might like to see this:


State of the timeshare industry in Aruba — A call for research Authors: Hahm, Jeeyeon; Lasten, Earney; Upchurch, Randall S; Peterson, Ryan

Source: Journal of Retail and Leisure Property, Volume 6, Number 3, July 2007 , pp. 221-229(9)

Publisher: Palgrave Macmillan
 
Abstract:

This case study is based on secondary data gathered concerning the state of the timeshare industry in Aruba. The major findings of this study indicate that there is a strong and growing consumer interest in timeshare ownership as a viable recreational alternative. This interest suggests that considerable empirical research is needed to understand the factors associated with sustaining the financial and economic impacts of the timeshare industry upon Aruba's economy.Journal of Retail and Leisure Property (2007) 6, 221-229. doi:10.1057/palgrave.rlp.5100066
Document Type: Research article

DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.rlp.5100066



I haven't looked at the source document yet to see what this is all about, but when I can I will. A

 "call for papers" realting to the state of the Aruban timeshare industry.....hmmmm interesting research topic!

 ::MonkeyEek::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Anna on March 05, 2008, 03:12:05 PM
Yeah, and why would Daury/Daddy say Joran what have YOU done if she just died with no evidence of violence?

Wouldn't Darury/Daddy instead ask what happened?  Not what Joran had DONE?

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Anna on March 05, 2008, 03:13:50 PM
Well, I am sure not being critical of Patrick, either.  He did a great job and bet we all have questions we wished he had asked for us but under the circumstances, he handled it just right to get the information out of an already paranoid Joran.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Peaches on March 05, 2008, 03:15:15 PM
Well, I am sure not being critical of Patrick, either.  He did a great job and bet we all have questions we wished he had asked for us but under the circumstances, he handled it just right to get the information out of an already paranoid Joran.



I agree, Anna.  Patrick is totally a hero.  I bet he has questions he wished he had asked too.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: klaasend on March 05, 2008, 03:17:03 PM
For those that missed it yesterday - click on play   ::MonkeyHaHa::

http://llnw.jibjab.com/content/player.swf?content_url=http://www.jibjab.com/sendables/api/remote/gJV7RXtucHG09M0FjC93b39k.xml


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 05, 2008, 03:22:00 PM
One of the authors has an interesting website that has a survey about Aruba's parks, oh and low and behold he used to work for guess who????

http://earneylasten.com/


EXPERIENCE


Strategic Analyst Manager 2004-2005
Aruba Tourism Authority, Oranjestad, Aruba
Responsible for International Marketing Consultancy


Information System Manager 1997-2004
Aruba Tourism Authority, Oranjestad, Aruba
Responsible for network, web design, and other technology projects


Public Relations/Data Processor 1989-1996
Aruba Tourism Authority, Oranjestad, Aruba
Participated in tourism trade shows, global meetings


Accountant 1986-1989
Lasten Accounting Services, N.V., Oranjestad, Aruba
Worked with overall accounting activities


Food Service Manager 1985-1986
Alken Exploitatie N.V., Oranjestad, Aruba
Worked with overall management activities



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: klaasend on March 05, 2008, 03:27:39 PM
One of the authors has an interesting website that has a survey about Aruba's parks, oh and low and behold he used to work for guess who????

http://earneylasten.com/


EXPERIENCE


Strategic Analyst Manager 2004-2005
Aruba Tourism Authority, Oranjestad, Aruba
Responsible for International Marketing Consultancy


Information System Manager 1997-2004
Aruba Tourism Authority, Oranjestad, Aruba
Responsible for network, web design, and other technology projects


Public Relations/Data Processor 1989-1996
Aruba Tourism Authority, Oranjestad, Aruba
Participated in tourism trade shows, global meetings


Accountant 1986-1989
Lasten Accounting Services, N.V., Oranjestad, Aruba
Worked with overall accounting activities


Food Service Manager 1985-1986
Alken Exploitatie N.V., Oranjestad, Aruba
Worked with overall management activities



Contact info - why are they all tied to Florida?

In United States Home
Earney F. Lasten
8775 Sartori Street #203

Orlando, FL 32829



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: JE on March 05, 2008, 03:27:50 PM
I had one other comment/question I wanted to post on the way out the door to do errands but wanted monkey thought on this.

I do so wish that Patrick had asked Joran why he threw away his shoes.  Here you have someone walking home on a rock scrabble island full of cacti in the DARK no less so what does he do?  He removes his shoes and tosses them into some drainage area.

What could have been so urgent he could not even finish his walk home in those shoes?  Now Joran is back in denial mode and will say he left them on the beach again but I so wish Patrick had asked him why he threw them away before he reverted back to his I am a tremendous liar mode.

What could have been on those shoes that required him to toss them?  He didn't say he lost them in the surf or muck but that on the way home, he purposely removed them.

Wet shoes dry, I know from experience especially tennis shoes even leather ones.  Vomit?  Could say Natalee threw up on him, poor Joran.  Vomit with GHB?  He could say he had not idea she had given herself such a drug.

Blood is the only thing I can think of that would be so bad he would not want to even finish walking home wearing those shoes.  Blood and Natalee's blood is the only one thing I can come up with that would require the immediate removal of the shoes, fear of being seen or caught with that on them and must have been showing for him to be desperate enough to walk home barefoot if that happened.

Even if it never happened and Paulus took him home, it would have been telling to hear his explanation for why he couldn't keep those shoes even long enough to get home in them.

.

A lawyer and his son whose hobby is criminal justice/how to get away with crimes would know not to track that around or have the shoes found later.

Just saying again. . . .

Off on errands but no matter what I am doing, my mind always wanders back to what happened to Natalee.

.

What i never could figure out is why he started this story about the shoes in the first place. Leaving his shoes at the beach or dumping them in a sewer or whatever only makes him look suspicious. Why did he not just get ridd of the shoes and simply not mention em to anyone. What's the big deal with these shoes. There is also the size 14 versus size 10 issue. It would have been so much easier just not to mention the shoes. Also if there was blood on his shoes that wouldn t that be on his clothes to? Cant imagine he walked home naked


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Spock on March 05, 2008, 03:28:18 PM
We need to get this right:

No matter what Mos says Joran is no longer a suspect.

Joran was released as a suspect in December and can not be watched, listened to, or surveiled.

Until Joran is rearrested under suspision of a crime, he can not legally be a suspect.

Joran can not be rearrested until physical evidence or a verifiable witness can be found.

Joran is free of judicial suspision and is in no way a legal suspect.

Joran has not been charged with a crime and there is not and may never be a trial date.

The only effect on Joran is that he is a "persona non grata"


I dont agree with it but thats how it is, under their system.

I also need to add:

The Kalpoes were released as suspects and cleared of all suspision in December

The Police authorities are forbidden from requestioning Joran or his many friends without a judges approval

The investigation can only proceed if new evidence is found, until that time there is no investigation.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Jo-An on March 05, 2008, 03:28:26 PM
For those that missed it yesterday - click on play   ::MonkeyHaHa::

http://llnw.jibjab.com/content/player.swf?content_url=http://www.jibjab.com/sendables/api/remote/gJV7RXtucHG09M0FjC93b39k.xml

Thanks, Klaas!  ::MonkeyHaHa::

*wipes tea off computerscreen*


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: katrien on March 05, 2008, 03:36:19 PM
Yeah, and why would Daury/Daddy say Joran what have YOU done if she just died with no evidence of violence?

Wouldn't Darury/Daddy instead ask what happened?  Not what Joran had DONE?

.

I also wonder about the shoes and the black eye.

But what would you do if you were somewere and someone got very sick?
Maybe panic and call some one else?
But wat does the person you call normally do than? My friends and family would say: stay were you are, we call an ambulance. I think every normal person would do so.

I don not understand.

Why did this not happen?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on March 05, 2008, 03:37:47 PM
 ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: Klaas, loved ittttttt!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Peaches on March 05, 2008, 03:38:02 PM
Klaas, that may be the best Anita has ever looked right there.

Hysterical the second time around, yessiree. ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: klaasend on March 05, 2008, 03:42:57 PM
Klaas, that may be the best Anita has ever looked right there.

Hysterical the second time around, yessiree. ::MonkeyLaugh::

I think that's from her ISA photo and she really looks nothing like that.  I was sorry I chose that head when I put together the jibjab, LOL  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Observer on March 05, 2008, 03:46:31 PM

What i never could figure out is why he started this story about the shoes in the first place. Leaving his shoes at the beach or dumping them in a sewer or whatever only makes him look suspicious. Why did he not just get ridd of the shoes and simply not mention em to anyone. What's the big deal with these shoes. There is also the size 14 versus size 10 issue. It would have been so much easier just not to mention the shoes. Also if there was blood on his shoes that wouldn t that be on his clothes to? Cant imagine he walked home naked

The initial story is what I believe to be true. Remember that first night Paul Van Der Sloot told a group of people he picked Joran up at 4AM. Then Joran said it was Deepak,then he walked home and then it was Satish.

First they were looking for one shoe a size 14 because the other had mud or blood on it,then a pair of Shoes size 14 which they announced to the World..If he does where size 10.5 then its just another reason to haul in everyone that was involved in the Investigation because they are lying. Why lie to everyone for Months about his shoes? He can't wear both shoes sizes,so someone is lying!

If they are lying about the shoes then they are lying about other things as well,we could put quite a list together for that! If they really wanted to solve this case it could be done very easily! I think it was already solved within the first two weeks.IMO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Rob on March 05, 2008, 03:50:36 PM
I have to agree with Buckshot's terrific post in the last thread. Nice Post Buckshot!!!

In my heart of hearts I believe Joran will have to be dealt with in another fashion. The criminal justice system is not for Joran. He would continue to make a total mockery out of it with his corrupt father and crooked mother. Also, in my opinion, the case is too screwed up for an idiot like Hans Mos to arrive 2 years later and reel it all in. That will not happen. The people before him made sure of that. Even if Mos was on the up and up, he does not have the balls it takes to take down everyone. Without the "house of cards", it does not really matter. The stragglers will get away. We all know who the stragglers are.

I have held out hope that the case would be prosecuted and even to this day I still have a determination to justice served one way or the other. Justice is not always wrapped up nice and tight with a pretty bow and delivered by FTD. It's a down and dirty business that only some truly recognize and appreciate - i.e. Godfather Peter R. He knew what it took to bring in that wretched human debris. Godfather Peter R hand delivered Joran van der Sloot and Mos said "no thank you"...that should tell you a lot right there.

The whole of Aruba is bankrupt. Not just segments of it. That is why you see no outrage from anyone on Aruba. It takes time to get to that low level. Like decades. Aruba didn't just arrive where they are through a magic port-hole. No one was tele-ported through the ages like those on Aruba in recorded history.

We have all been following the case very intently for almost three years (pat yourselves on the back, Justice means something important to you and you're a good person to stand up for someone you most likely do not know) and we are no closer to seeing Joran behind bars than we were on day one. That's repulsive and challenges my belief system. AND I DON'T LIKE IT.

I would love to see one person stand up and do the right thing. One person beside Patrick. Someone with a set of nuts to slam the door on Paulus and Joran. It shouldn't be that hard to find someone in a position of Authority to do what's right.

Sure, we know a lot more than we did and we have seen it all. But there is one thing we have not seen or are likely to see, and that's Joran van der Sloot tried and convicted.

I'm going to pray extra hard tonight that Joran gets "dealt with".


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Tater on March 05, 2008, 03:51:30 PM
For those that missed it yesterday - click on play   ::MonkeyHaHa::

http://llnw.jibjab.com/content/player.swf?content_url=http://www.jibjab.com/sendables/api/remote/gJV7RXtucHG09M0FjC93b39k.xml

Such talent!!!!I'd like to wipe that **TA-DA** finished look right off their faces though... :ncool: Could you try one with Yoran ::MonkeyHaHa:: and Anita crying,Polly sweating,brothers hanging their head in shame?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: JE on March 05, 2008, 03:53:31 PM

What i never could figure out is why he started this story about the shoes in the first place. Leaving his shoes at the beach or dumping them in a sewer or whatever only makes him look suspicious. Why did he not just get ridd of the shoes and simply not mention em to anyone. What's the big deal with these shoes. There is also the size 14 versus size 10 issue. It would have been so much easier just not to mention the shoes. Also if there was blood on his shoes that wouldn t that be on his clothes to? Cant imagine he walked home naked

The initial story is what I believe to be true. Remember that first night Paul Van Der Sloot told a group of people he picked Joran up at 4AM. Then Joran said it was Deepak,then he walked home and then it was Satish.

First they were looking for one shoe a size 14 because the other had mud or blood on it,then a pair of Shoes size 14 which they announced to the World..If he does where size 10.5 then its just another reason to haul in everyone that was involved in the Investigation because they are lying. Why lie to everyone for Months about his shoes? He can't wear both shoes sizes,so someone is lying!

If they are lying about the shoes then they are lying about other things as well,we could put quite a list together for that! If they really wanted to solve this case it could be done very easily! I think it was already solved within the first two weeks.IMO

******* do you know the date when they were looking for it and where they found the bloody/muddy shoe?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 05, 2008, 03:56:02 PM
One of the authors has an interesting website that has a survey about Aruba's parks, oh and low and behold he used to work for guess who????

http://earneylasten.com/


EXPERIENCE


Strategic Analyst Manager 2004-2005
Aruba Tourism Authority, Oranjestad, Aruba
Responsible for International Marketing Consultancy


Information System Manager 1997-2004
Aruba Tourism Authority, Oranjestad, Aruba
Responsible for network, web design, and other technology projects


Public Relations/Data Processor 1989-1996
Aruba Tourism Authority, Oranjestad, Aruba
Participated in tourism trade shows, global meetings


Accountant 1986-1989
Lasten Accounting Services, N.V., Oranjestad, Aruba
Worked with overall accounting activities


Food Service Manager 1985-1986
Alken Exploitatie N.V., Oranjestad, Aruba
Worked with overall management activities



Contact info - why are they all tied to Florida?

In United States Home
Earney F. Lasten
8775 Sartori Street #203

Orlando, FL 32829




In United States Home
Earney F. Lasten
8775 Sartori Street #203

Orlando, FL 32829

Mobile Phone: 407-484-3237
Email: me@earneylasten.com

In Aruba
University of Aruba

Universiteit van Aruba
Irausquinplein 4
Oranjestad
Aruba

Phone: 5823901
Fax: 5884422
 
 
University

Rosen College of Hospitality Management
9907 Universal Blvd
Orlando, Florida 32819

Email: elasten@pegasus.cc.ucf.edu

 
It looks like he has an affiliation with Rosen and UoA, interesting that he left ATA in 2005, I wonder exactly when. He is not on the list of profs at Rosen:

http://www.hospitality.ucf.edu/faculty.html

Looks like he might be an adjunct at the University of Central Florida, teaching tourism.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Peaches on March 05, 2008, 04:00:16 PM
I have to agree with Buckshot's terrific post in the last thread. Nice Post Buckshot!!!

In my heart of hearts I believe Joran will have to be dealt with in another fashion. The criminal justice system is not for Joran. He would continue to make a total mockery out of it with his corrupt father and crooked mother. Also, in my opinion, the case is too screwed up for an idiot like Hans Mos to arrive 2 years later and reel it all in. That will not happen. The people before him made sure of that. Even if Mos was on the up and up, he does not have the balls it takes to take down everyone. Without the "house of cards", it does not really matter. The stragglers will get away. We all know who the stragglers are.

I have held out hope that the case would be prosecuted and even to this day I still have a determination to justice served one way or the other. Justice is not always wrapped up nice and tight with a pretty bow and delivered by FTD. It's a down and dirty business that only some truly recognize and appreciate - i.e. Godfather Peter R. He knew what it took to bring in that wretched human debris. Godfather Peter R hand delivered Joran van der Sloot and Mos said "no thank you"...that should tell you a lot right there.

The whole of Aruba is bankrupt. Not just segments of it. That is why you see no outrage from anyone on Aruba. It takes time to get to that low level. Like decades. Aruba didn't just arrive where they are through a magic port-hole. No one was tele-ported through the ages like those on Aruba in recorded history.

We have all been following the case very intently for almost three years (pat yourselves on the back, Justice means something important to you and you're a good person to stand up for someone you most likely do not know) and we are no closer to seeing Joran behind bars than we were on day one. That's repulsive and challenges my belief system. AND I DON'T LIKE IT.

I would love to see one person stand up and do the right thing. One person beside Patrick. Someone with a set of nuts to slam the door on Paulus and Joran. It shouldn't be that hard to find someone in a position of Authority to do what's right.

Sure, we know a lot more than we did and we have seen it all. But there is one thing we have not seen or are likely to see, and that's Joran van der Sloot tried and convicted.

I'm going to pray extra hard tonight that Joran gets "dealt with".

Post of the day, darlin'.  JMHO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Observer on March 05, 2008, 04:00:41 PM

******* do you know the date when they were looking for it and where they found the bloody/muddy shoe?
In the beginning of the case they were looking for one shoe only. They had another shoe with mud or blood on it,I forget which one it was. However when they did the pond search  in July,Dompig announced to everyone it was a pair of shoes they were looking for,so I did a double take and many others did at RWV as well. We never heard anything from the initial reports until the search at the Pond.

Somewhere deep in the archives you will see the initial reports of looking for one shoe,I am positive of that! They were trying to find the missing shoe is what we were told in the beginning.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: caesu on March 05, 2008, 04:07:02 PM
I have to agree with Buckshot's terrific post in the last thread. Nice Post Buckshot!!!

In my heart of hearts I believe Joran will have to be dealt with in another fashion. The criminal justice system is not for Joran. He would continue to make a total mockery out of it with his corrupt father and crooked mother. Also, in my opinion, the case is too screwed up for an idiot like Hans Mos to arrive 2 years later and reel it all in. That will not happen. The people before him made sure of that. Even if Mos was on the up and up, he does not have the balls it takes to take down everyone. Without the "house of cards", it does not really matter. The stragglers will get away. We all know who the stragglers are.

I have held out hope that the case would be prosecuted and even to this day I still have a determination to justice served one way or the other. Justice is not always wrapped up nice and tight with a pretty bow and delivered by FTD. It's a down and dirty business that only some truly recognize and appreciate - i.e. Godfather Peter R. He knew what it took to bring in that wretched human debris. Godfather Peter R hand delivered Joran van der Sloot and Mos said "no thank you"...that should tell you a lot right there.

The whole of Aruba is bankrupt. Not just segments of it. That is why you see no outrage from anyone on Aruba. It takes time to get to that low level. Like decades. Aruba didn't just arrive where they are through a magic port-hole. No one was tele-ported through the ages like those on Aruba in recorded history.

We have all been following the case very intently for almost three years (pat yourselves on the back, Justice means something important to you and you're a good person to stand up for someone you most likely do not know) and we are no closer to seeing Joran behind bars than we were on day one. That's repulsive and challenges my belief system. AND I DON'T LIKE IT.

I would love to see one person stand up and do the right thing. One person beside Patrick. Someone with a set of nuts to slam the door on Paulus and Joran. It shouldn't be that hard to find someone in a position of Authority to do what's right.

Sure, we know a lot more than we did and we have seen it all. But there is one thing we have not seen or are likely to see, and that's Joran van der Sloot tried and convicted.

I'm going to pray extra hard tonight that Joran gets "dealt with".

i think there is a good chance that if after the september 2009 aruba elections the AVP gets in the government and the MEP looses there will be whistle blowers and of scandals of the previous government (current Oduber) will come out.
or crown witnesess who testify to save their asses about other scandals.
still now there are court cases against officials from before 2001 (AVP).

in the meantime peter r., beth en bram mosko will keep the pressure on.
and the pressure will get higher when peter r. next broadcast comes out.

also the dutch political party bringing up the corruption (PVV) is bound to win in an next dutch election.
that election might be soon. that also puts pressure on aruba.

and the antilles (though specifically aruba) will be a lot in the news because of the upcoming changes regarding their status in the kingdom decemer 2008.

so a lot of factor at play. only to bring these together at the right time.

that's how i see things. and i don't think i am the only one.
it only the pace it goes is frustrating, but the ball is unstoppable i think.

mos is not important, he will be gone in 2009 anyway. he is playing a delaying game i think.
nobody wants to be there when the shit hits the fan.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: mojo on March 05, 2008, 04:11:51 PM
caesu, there's also a lot of crime in holland that is related to antilles' youths, no?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 05, 2008, 04:13:42 PM
Other than the Holiday Inn fabrication ... I believe that each of Joran's accounts regarding how he got home that fateful morning as well as the insertion of the missing shoes has everything to do with implicating Deepak/Satish as being the last person/s alone with Natalee Holloway.

If Deepak or Satish admitted to picking up Joran at the beach they would be furthering Joran's agenda of implicating themselves in what happened to Natalee Holloway.  However ... if they maintain that they only dropped Natalee and Joran off at the Marriot Beach ... then they are implicating Joran as the last person with Natalee.

In my opinion, when you consider the gardener's observation at 2:30 AM on the morning that Natalee disappearance ... Joran, Deepak and Satish are all lying.   

Janet

+++++++++++++++++


"I WALKED HOME".
Joran is implying that Deepak/Satish returned to beach after he  contacted Deepak and stated he was in the process of walking home after leaving Natalee at the beach sleeping.


"DEEPAK AND SATISH DROPPED ME OFF AT HOME AND LEFT WITH NATALEE".
Joran is implying that Deepak and Satish were the last persons observed with the missing 18 year old American citizen.


"DEEPAK PICKED ME UP AT THE BEACH AND THEN RETURNED TO LOOK FOR MY SHOES."
Joran is implying that Deepak could have encountered Natalee Holloway at the Marriot Beach where she had been left alone a short time previous


"SATISH PICKED ME UP AT THE BEACH AND THEN RETURNED TO LOOK FOR MY SHOES."
Joran is implying that Satish could have encountered Natalee Holloway at the Marriot Beach where she had been left alone a short time previous


+++++++++++++

THE GARDENER

Jossy Mansur
NANCY GRACE
July 26, 2005


MANSUR: Because they were trying to hide their faces at that the hour, because we have to remember that the two Kalpoe brothers and Joran held on to the statement that they dropped Joran off at the beach and then went home. But here we have someone that says categorically that they did not go home, they were in the car with Joran. Joran was sitting in the driver`s seat.


Jossy Mansur
NANCY GRACE
August 17, 2005


JOSSY MANSUR, MANAGING EDITOR, "DIARIO": I don`t know what`s happening, but the gardener, the witness, did stand by his story. He did confirm in front of the judge, in front of the defense attorneys, in front of the suspects, that he recognized, and he even recognized two of the three suspects that were there. He hasn`t changed his story one bit


Beth Twitty
CNN LARRY KING LIVE
February 23, 2006


BETH HOLLOWAY TWITTY: ... Deepak panicked. He panicked when the gardener gave that testimony. That very afternoon, he called an Aruban girl to help him establish an alibi. She, in turn, panicked. She called FBI. She dialed the 1-877-NATALEE number and told them that she did not want to be involved in this.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: JE on March 05, 2008, 04:17:14 PM

******* do you know the date when they were looking for it and where they found the bloody/muddy shoe?
In the beginning of the case they were looking for one shoe only. They had another shoe with mud or blood on it,I forget which one it was. However when they did the pond search  in July,Dompig announced to everyone it was a pair of shoes they were looking for,so I did a double take and many others did at RWV as well. We never heard anything from the initial reports until the search at the Pond.

Somewhere deep in the archives you will see the initial reports of looking for one shoe,I am positive of that! They were trying to find the missing shoe is what we were told in the beginning.

The date on wich they found the shoe and when they searched for it interests me beacuse he always as far as i know stuck to the leaving shoes on the beach story. What would be the point if the police had one of the shoes in their posession. Also in his june 9th statement he doesn t really know if he wore white shoes or creme coloured boots. Then on june 14th he has a brain wave (must have hurt) and says he wore kswiss white and blue coloured size 14 and bought in the USA. I d really like to know where the police found the shoe and when.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Rob on March 05, 2008, 04:19:20 PM
caesu, thanks for your opinion and to you too Elaine.

Personally, I have seen enough of small island politics to last a lifetime. What happens if the MEP does not lose? They won the last election even with all this going on. What then? kick it down the road for four more years? I agree, the next election is a make or break for the MEP and Aruba. But the AVP is hardly any better.

When the MEP was running against the AVP the last time they accused the AVP of being corrupt... imagine that!!!

Could any government be more corrupt than that of the MEP? wait don't answer that. LOL

The Whole of Aruba is less than 100,ooo people. Somewhere between 70k and 100k. No real stats to confirm this I'm afraid. And with the government jobs that skyrocketed, it's hard to imagine that the AVP would get enough votes, including from those likely to lose their jobs should the AVP take over.

So, right now, even though Aruba is in the can, the MEP still holds the voting base.

It can be reasonably argued that the MEP has gone after their political opponents and their families pretty harshly over the last four years... and I'm sure the MEP would say it is payback for the AVP going after the MEP when they lost power the last time.

it's a circle. And one not likely to change. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Magnolia on March 05, 2008, 04:19:41 PM

What i never could figure out is why he started this story about the shoes in the first place. Leaving his shoes at the beach or dumping them in a sewer or whatever only makes him look suspicious. Why did he not just get ridd of the shoes and simply not mention em to anyone. What's the big deal with these shoes. There is also the size 14 versus size 10 issue. It would have been so much easier just not to mention the shoes. Also if there was blood on his shoes that wouldn t that be on his clothes to? Cant imagine he walked home naked

The initial story is what I believe to be true. Remember that first night Paul Van Der Sloot told a group of people he picked Joran up at 4AM. Then Joran said it was Deepak,then he walked home and then it was Satish.

First they were looking for one shoe a size 14 because the other had mud or blood on it,then a pair of Shoes size 14 which they announced to the World..If he does where size 10.5 then its just another reason to haul in everyone that was involved in the Investigation because they are lying. Why lie to everyone for Months about his shoes? He can't wear both shoes sizes,so someone is lying!

If they are lying about the shoes then they are lying about other things as well,we could put quite a list together for that! If they really wanted to solve this case it could be done very easily! I think it was already solved within the first two weeks.IMO

******* do you know the date when they were looking for it and where they found the bloody/muddy shoe?

I think I remember Beth saying that they found the one shoe in Joran's closet
and it had blood on it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Observer on March 05, 2008, 04:20:44 PM
Early in the case Tito Lacle a reporter said during his interview with Greta that his sources tell him that authorities are looking for a shoe that Joran lost, possibly in the pond area, and that Joran tried to buy another one to match the shoe he lost. Greta commented that it would have been difficult for Joran to walk home the night of Natalee's disappearance with only one shoe


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Observer on March 05, 2008, 04:22:36 PM

******* do you know the date when they were looking for it and where they found the bloody/muddy shoe?

I think I remember Beth saying that they found the one shoe in Joran's closet
and it had blood on it.

She most definetly said that and Beth added she never knew if they tested it or not or any results.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: JE on March 05, 2008, 04:30:26 PM

******* do you know the date when they were looking for it and where they found the bloody/muddy shoe?

I think I remember Beth saying that they found the one shoe in Joran's closet
and it had blood on it.

She most definetly said that and Beth added she never knew if they tested it or not or any results.

******* magnolia thx for your answers. I d still like to know a date if anyone has one. Shoe in closet size 14....mmm
JVDS has size 10.5 You dont suppose it could be someone elses shoe do you?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Tater on March 05, 2008, 04:31:47 PM
Didn't someone claim Yoran passed their house covered in mud from waist down in the wee hours of the morning?Shoe stuck in the mud?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on March 05, 2008, 04:36:27 PM
One of the authors has an interesting website that has a survey about Aruba's parks, oh and low and behold he used to work for guess who????

http://earneylasten.com/


EXPERIENCE


Strategic Analyst Manager 2004-2005
Aruba Tourism Authority, Oranjestad, Aruba
Responsible for International Marketing Consultancy


Information System Manager 1997-2004
Aruba Tourism Authority, Oranjestad, Aruba
Responsible for network, web design, and other technology projects


Public Relations/Data Processor 1989-1996
Aruba Tourism Authority, Oranjestad, Aruba
Participated in tourism trade shows, global meetings


Accountant 1986-1989
Lasten Accounting Services, N.V., Oranjestad, Aruba
Worked with overall accounting activities


Food Service Manager 1985-1986
Alken Exploitatie N.V., Oranjestad, Aruba
Worked with overall management activities



Contact info - why are they all tied to Florida?

In United States Home
Earney F. Lasten
8775 Sartori Street #203

Orlando, FL 32829



Sorry, but I am always behind...(work is a bear)....but can someone tell me the significance of this person?  I'm just curious.  TIA


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Jo-An on March 05, 2008, 04:39:54 PM
Robert Jensen Show with Beth Holloway - Peter R de Vries - Patrick van der Eem - Bram Moszkowicz

-Beth: Patrick is a great man, a great father, he's my hero
-Patrick talking about how he wanted to frame Joran, that was his only goal
-Patrick says he has a criminal past but changed drastically after he was about 21 years old, he started selling heroin at the age of 15, he's been in jail twice, drugsrelated
-Patrick talking again about meeting Joran for the first time in the Dutch casino and working towards the confession tapes, getting Joran to trust him
-Patrick says Joran told him he didn't respect his parents, didn't listen to them but that's nothing special for a 20-year old

No new info so far.

Beth was just sitting there the hold time, Robert and Patrick only spoke Dutch.

*commercial break*


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: bleachedblack on March 05, 2008, 04:42:33 PM
This is an interesting bit of info I don't recall hearing about before. Sure hope ALE followed up on this.......
 
>>>>SNIP

Three weeks ago, a tourist from North Carolina called me to ask me how to get in touch with police. She and her husband had been out exploring the island, and they came across a sneaker.

They knew investigators were looking for a pair of sneakers that belonged to van der Sloot. And, they knew the sneaker they spotted probably was just something someone left behind, but they couldn't let it go. She wanted to let police know about it.

http://tinyurl.com/3bkhpb


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Jo-An on March 05, 2008, 04:43:17 PM
Robert Jensen Show with Beth Holloway - Peter R de Vries - Patrick van der Eem - Bram Moszkowicz

-Beth: Patrick is a great man, a great father, he's my hero
-Patrick talking about how he wanted to frame Joran, that was his only goal
-Patrick says he has a criminal past but changed drastically after he was about 21 years old, he started selling heroin at the age of 15, he's been in jail twice, drugsrelated
-Patrick talking again about meeting Joran for the first time in the Dutch casino and working towards the confession tapes, getting Joran to trust him
-Patrick says Joran told him he didn't respect his parents, didn't listen to them but that's nothing special for a 20-year old

No new info so far.

Beth was just sitting there the hold whole time, Robert and Patrick only spoke Dutch.

*commercial break*

Self-edit: whole


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 05, 2008, 04:44:03 PM
I have to agree with Buckshot's terrific post in the last thread. Nice Post Buckshot!!!

In my heart of hearts I believe Joran will have to be dealt with in another fashion. The criminal justice system is not for Joran. He would continue to make a total mockery out of it with his corrupt father and crooked mother. Also, in my opinion, the case is too screwed up for an idiot like Hans Mos to arrive 2 years later and reel it all in. That will not happen. The people before him made sure of that. Even if Mos was on the up and up, he does not have the balls it takes to take down everyone. Without the "house of cards", it does not really matter. The stragglers will get away. We all know who the stragglers are.

I have held out hope that the case would be prosecuted and even to this day I still have a determination to justice served one way or the other. Justice is not always wrapped up nice and tight with a pretty bow and delivered by FTD. It's a down and dirty business that only some truly recognize and appreciate - i.e. Godfather Peter R. He knew what it took to bring in that wretched human debris. Godfather Peter R hand delivered Joran van der Sloot and Mos said "no thank you"...that should tell you a lot right there.

The whole of Aruba is bankrupt. Not just segments of it. That is why you see no outrage from anyone on Aruba. It takes time to get to that low level. Like decades. Aruba didn't just arrive where they are through a magic port-hole. No one was tele-ported through the ages like those on Aruba in recorded history.

We have all been following the case very intently for almost three years (pat yourselves on the back, Justice means something important to you and you're a good person to stand up for someone you most likely do not know) and we are no closer to seeing Joran behind bars than we were on day one. That's repulsive and challenges my belief system. AND I DON'T LIKE IT.

I would love to see one person stand up and do the right thing. One person beside Patrick. Someone with a set of nuts to slam the door on Paulus and Joran. It shouldn't be that hard to find someone in a position of Authority to do what's right.

Sure, we know a lot more than we did and we have seen it all. But there is one thing we have not seen or are likely to see, and that's Joran van der Sloot tried and convicted.

I'm going to pray extra hard tonight that Joran gets "dealt with".


Superior post, Rob. You're right on about Hans Less having no balls. Those don't exist on Aruba. They are too low a form of life to have developed testicles.

Spot on about everyone down there being corrupt, and it doesn't take long for them to get that way. Any hammer that comes down will have to come from Holland and if they say they don't have the power to do it they have no balls either. They hold the purse strings on Aruba and as we well know that is all they have been concerned about in the first place, money.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Magnolia on March 05, 2008, 04:46:36 PM


The date on wich they found the shoe and when they searched for it interests me beacuse he always as far as i know stuck to the leaving shoes on the beach story. What would be the point if the police had one of the shoes in their posession. Also in his june 9th statement he doesn t really know if he wore white shoes or creme coloured boots. Then on june 14th he has a brain wave (must have hurt) and says he wore kswiss white and blue coloured size 14 and bought in the USA. I d really like to know where the police found the shoe and when.
[/quote]
=====================================================================

They found the shoe the day they had the search warrant to search the vd/Sloot
residence and only searched Joran's quarters.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 05, 2008, 04:50:11 PM

i think there is a good chance that if after the september 2009 aruba elections the AVP gets in the government and the MEP looses there will be whistle blowers and of scandals of the previous government (current Oduber) will come out.
or crown witnesess who testify to save their asses about other scandals.
still now there are court cases against officials from before 2001 (AVP).

in the meantime peter r., beth en bram mosko will keep the pressure on.
and the pressure will get higher when peter r. next broadcast comes out.

also the dutch political party bringing up the corruption (PVV) is bound to win in an next dutch election.
that election might be soon. that also puts pressure on aruba.

and the antilles (though specifically aruba) will be a lot in the news because of the upcoming changes regarding their status in the kingdom decemer 2008.

so a lot of factor at play. only to bring these together at the right time.

that's how i see things. and i don't think i am the only one.
it only the pace it goes is frustrating, but the ball is unstoppable i think.

mos is not important, he will be gone in 2009 anyway. he is playing a delaying game i think.
nobody wants to be there when the shit hits the fan.


Hope you are right about the politics changing Caesu because this has played a major role in the corruption. Karin Jannsen was owned lock stock and barrel by somebody higher than she was, somebody told her to put the case in reverse and she obliged. Like Van der Straten she fled the island after she had sufficiently botched the case and that's why we are where we are today.

Jannsen and Straten need to have their asses drug in and questioned.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Observer on March 05, 2008, 04:51:35 PM
Didn't someone claim Yoran passed their house covered in mud from waist down in the wee hours of the morning?Shoe stuck in the mud?

I have never seen a credible report that said that. Truth is the Gardner witness messes up most theories,as it was only a hour after C&C. He says that Joran was in the drivers seat,Deepak in the front and someone in the back leaned the other way across the seat. My question is where was Natalee? Was the person in back covering her or was she somewhere else?

I know when they searched the Pond area they would not allow the Family to be there. So much mis-information it's hard to tell what is true. Dompig wanted everyone to be on the lookout for these pair of K-Swiss shoes and thought they may find them in the Pond.
Many people's theories center around the FH area and the 500 yards to the Raquet Club/Pond area seen here.

(http://i198.photobucket.com/albums/aa118/Observer00000007/pond.jpg)



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on March 05, 2008, 04:54:16 PM
One of the authors has an interesting website that has a survey about Aruba's parks, oh and low and behold he used to work for guess who????

http://earneylasten.com/


EXPERIENCE


Strategic Analyst Manager 2004-2005
Aruba Tourism Authority, Oranjestad, Aruba
Responsible for International Marketing Consultancy


Information System Manager 1997-2004
Aruba Tourism Authority, Oranjestad, Aruba
Responsible for network, web design, and other technology projects


Public Relations/Data Processor 1989-1996
Aruba Tourism Authority, Oranjestad, Aruba
Participated in tourism trade shows, global meetings


Accountant 1986-1989
Lasten Accounting Services, N.V., Oranjestad, Aruba
Worked with overall accounting activities


Food Service Manager 1985-1986
Alken Exploitatie N.V., Oranjestad, Aruba
Worked with overall management activities



Contact info - why are they all tied to Florida?

In United States Home
Earney F. Lasten
8775 Sartori Street #203

Orlando, FL 32829



Keep your money diversified.They probably all have money in different countries due to the laundry everyone on Aruba does.Would love to know in which countries the VDS family has Bank Accounts and which banks????Who those banks are tied to and why???Would be telling i think.May have already been gone over but just a thought.What Businesses do the VDS family own and which countries.Yes.Aunts,Uncles,Parents,grandparents.Follow the money it leads somewhere.....Just thoughts...Beautiful sunny day in Seattle ::MonkeyDance::


Keepthefaith


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 05, 2008, 04:55:12 PM

What i never could figure out is why he started this story about the shoes in the first place. Leaving his shoes at the beach or dumping them in a sewer or whatever only makes him look suspicious. Why did he not just get ridd of the shoes and simply not mention em to anyone. What's the big deal with these shoes. There is also the size 14 versus size 10 issue. It would have been so much easier just not to mention the shoes. Also if there was blood on his shoes that wouldn t that be on his clothes to? Cant imagine he walked home naked


There is only one reason I can think of that he'd change shoe size, JE, and that is to frame someone else. I think his shoes had blood/vomit DNA evidence on them and he had to get rid of them, but to switch sizes would mean he needed to deflect suspicion to somebody else with a different shoe size in case his were found.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: jackb on March 05, 2008, 04:56:24 PM

******* do you know the date when they were looking for it and where they found the bloody/muddy shoe?
In the beginning of the case they were looking for one shoe only. They had another shoe with mud or blood on it,I forget which one it was. However when they did the pond search  in July,Dompig announced to everyone it was a pair of shoes they were looking for,so I did a double take and many others did at RWV as well. We never heard anything from the initial reports until the search at the Pond.

Somewhere deep in the archives you will see the initial reports of looking for one shoe,I am positive of that! They were trying to find the missing shoe is what we were told in the beginning.

He seems like is wanting to say:"someone stole my shoes so if you find them and find DNA on them, they stole them and then killed NH."  The ALE already reported finding one shoe at JVs home early in the case with blood, said it was JVs, etc.  They were not going to let that slip until they saw that the other shoe might be found and have DNA on it as well and could be found and turned over to FBI, etc.  They get rid of the one shoe and now Joran can say both his shoes are missing and in case one is found someone used them both and threw them away separately.  He has it "covered" since the ALE friends are disappearing evidence.  They took a ball bat out of that apartment as well.  Have not head mention of it since.  Some were trying to do their job, no knowing Vandderstratten and his flunkies were destroying evidence as fast as it was produced. Some of the evidence most likely is hidden and will be used over Joran and Palus and Vanderstrattens head as long as they live (and then some) if people who are using the justice system and ALE to further their criminal activities have an say over it.  Posner has videos and his bosses have them by now.  They will use this, at least, over Aruba's head until they clean out that nest of vipers so they can get fresh waters of Truth flowing into Aruba.  Those thugs certainly have bittered the waters of Aruba.  They need flushing out.  That little place has no business being an independent country, non of them do if they cannot control their LE and justice system.  It, at that size is too easy to corrupt.     Jack b


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: bleachedblack on March 05, 2008, 04:57:33 PM
Early in the case Tito Lacle a reporter said during his interview with Greta that his sources tell him that authorities are looking for a shoe that Joran lost, possibly in the pond area, and that Joran tried to buy another one to match the shoe he lost. Greta commented that it would have been difficult for Joran to walk home the night of Natalee's disappearance with only one shoe

This is exactly what I recall. There have been various reports though. One at RWV stated that the sneaker found in Jorans closet had mud on it. But what I remember is that ALE found one sneaker with a spot of blood on it in Jorans closet. Never did hear anything about DNA testing yhat might have been done.

++++++++++++++

Natalee Holloway Update: Missing Shoe
I've been informed that at a press conference today investigators have asked anyone that may have information as regards a sneaker - K-SWISS (White and Blue) size 14 possibly seen or found near the Marriott or the Fisherman's Hut area to please contact the Police.
Earlier reports have suggested that a search at the home of Joran Va der Sloot turned up a shoe which may have been covered with mud, or muck. The shoe had no match. The last bit of information hasn't been independently confirmed.
http://www.riehlworldview.com/carnivorous_conservative/2005/07/natalee_hollowa_91.html


On 12-6 BETH told “FoxNews” that early in the investigation, the family was told by the ARUBAN police investigators that blood was found inside a 5-29/30-worn “K-Swiss” brand, size 14, tennis shoe that is predominantly white with some blue trim that belongs to Principal Suspect J. SLOOT that was taken into evidence (the other 5-29/30-worn “K-Swiss” brand, size 14 tennis shoe has--according to the ARUBAN police authorities--has never been found). The ARUBAN police investigators told the family that the found blood inside the tennis shoe taken into evidence would be forensically tested, but, to date, BETH said she does not recall for sure if the ARUBAN police investigators have ever reported about the results of any blood tests, nor have the DUTCH nor the ARUBANS even said if the blood tests have ever been completed on the shoe.

http://members.aol.com/worldJOURNIER/NATALEE/NATALEEtimeline.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 05, 2008, 04:58:36 PM
Robert Jensen Show with Beth Holloway - Peter R de Vries - Patrick van der Eem - Bram Moszkowicz

-Beth: Patrick is a great man, a great father, he's my hero
-Patrick talking about how he wanted to frame Joran, that was his only goal
-Patrick says he has a criminal past but changed drastically after he was about 21 years old, he started selling heroin at the age of 15, he's been in jail twice, drugsrelated
-Patrick talking again about meeting Joran for the first time in the Dutch casino and working towards the confession tapes, getting Joran to trust him
-Patrick says Joran told him he didn't respect his parents, didn't listen to them but that's nothing special for a 20-year old

No new info so far.

Beth was just sitting there the hold whole time, Robert and Patrick only spoke Dutch.

*commercial break*

Self-edit: whole


Thank you, Jo-An. No telephone call from Jensen to the Pimp today? He may be saving that for when Peter is sitting there.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Observer on March 05, 2008, 05:00:00 PM

What i never could figure out is why he started this story about the shoes in the first place. Leaving his shoes at the beach or dumping them in a sewer or whatever only makes him look suspicious. Why did he not just get ridd of the shoes and simply not mention em to anyone. What's the big deal with these shoes. There is also the size 14 versus size 10 issue. It would have been so much easier just not to mention the shoes. Also if there was blood on his shoes that wouldn t that be on his clothes to? Cant imagine he walked home naked


There is only one reason I can think of that he'd change shoe size, JE, and that is to frame someone else. I think his shoes had blood/vomit DNA evidence on them and he had to get rid of them, but to switch sizes would mean he needed to deflect suspicion to somebody else with a different shoe size in case his were found.

But it wouldn't be Joran acting alone trying to frame someone else,because they knew darn well what size she he wears. As of right now they are caught in this lie as well.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Jo-An on March 05, 2008, 05:03:54 PM
Robert Jensen Show with Beth Holloway - Peter R de Vries - Patrick van der Eem - Bram Moszkowicz - Part 2

-Joran texted Patrick even after the confession tapes, Joran texted: "you're even sicker than I am"
-Patrick still has 126 text-messages left on his cell that Joran sent him, about 10 of them after the PRDV-show
-Patrick gives Robert his cellphone, Robert shows one of the messages, it was about drugs
-Robert asks, "can I call Joran?"
-Robert calls Joran, Joran answers but that's all he says, Patrick says Joran usually doesn't answer the phone, lets it go to voicemail
-Patrick doesn't know where Joran is, is not even interested in knowing where he is
-Robert applauding Beth for staying strong throughout this whole time
-enter Peter
-Beth is saying that she always felt that Peter had to be the one that could help her, and he did
-Robert asks what Peter thinks is the most important thing in the tapes: Peter says it's when Joran imitates Natalee's shaking, he did that more than once, in more than one recording,
Peter says that that was really real, that was not a lie
-Peter says Patrick's past is not important at all, what's important is what Joran said
-enter Bram
-Bram is here to talk to Beth after the show, he will be back on the show next week
-Patrick calls Beth a supermom

So no new info, no new developments.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 05, 2008, 05:04:02 PM

There is only one reason I can think of that he'd change shoe size, JE, and that is to frame someone else. I think his shoes had blood/vomit DNA evidence on them and he had to get rid of them, but to switch sizes would mean he needed to deflect suspicion to somebody else with a different shoe size in case his were found.

But it wouldn't be Joran acting alone trying to frame someone else,because they knew darn well what size she he wears. As of right now they are caught in this lie as well.


The shoes must mean something or Joran wouldn't have told Patrick he threw them in a gutter after months of having claimed he left them on the beach. It would have been a non-story, nothing to lie about, if they weren't pertinent to the story.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: mojo on March 05, 2008, 05:06:34 PM
Thanks Jo-An


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 05, 2008, 05:06:35 PM
Robert Jensen Show with Beth Holloway - Peter R de Vries - Patrick van der Eem - Bram Moszkowicz - Part 2

-Joran texted Patrick even after the confession tapes, Joran texted: "you're even sicker than I am"
-Patrick still has 126 text-messages left on his cell that Joran sent him, about 10 of them after the PRDV-show
-Patrick gives Robert his cellphone, Robert shows one of the messages, it was about drugs
-Robert asks, "can I call Joran?"
-Robert calls Joran, Joran answers but that's all he says, Patrick says Joran usually doesn't answer the phone, lets it go to voicemail
-Patrick doesn't know where Joran is, is not even interested in knowing where he is
-Robert applauding Beth for staying strong throughout this whole time
-enter Peter
-Beth is saying that she always felt that Peter had to be the one that could help her, and he did
-Robert asks what Peter thinks is the most important thing in the tapes: Peter says it's when Joran imitates Natalee's shaking, he did that more than once, in more than one recording,
Peter says that that was really real, that was not a lie
-Peter says Patrick's past is not important at all, what's important is what Joran said
-enter Bram
-Bram is here to talk to Beth after the show, he will be back on the show next week
-Patrick calls Beth a supermom

So no new info, no new developments.


Nothing new but I am glad they are keeping the story alive. It just reinforces what a criminal Joran is. Thanks Jo-An!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: jackb on March 05, 2008, 05:09:00 PM
Robert Jensen Show with Beth Holloway - Peter R de Vries - Patrick van der Eem - Bram Moszkowicz

-Beth: Patrick is a great man, a great father, he's my hero
-Patrick talking about how he wanted to frame Joran, that was his only goal
-Patrick says he has a criminal past but changed drastically after he was about 21 years old, he started selling heroin at the age of 15, he's been in jail twice, drugsrelated
-Patrick talking again about meeting Joran for the first time in the Dutch casino and working towards the confession tapes, getting Joran to trust him
-Patrick says Joran told him he didn't respect his parents, didn't listen to them but that's nothing special for a 20-year old

No new info so far.

Beth was just sitting there the hold whole time, Robert and Patrick only spoke Dutch.

*commercial break*

Self-edit: whole


Thank you, Jo-An. No telephone call from Jensen to the Pimp today? He may be saving that for when Peter is sitting there.


  FRAMING is not a word, I believe Patrick had in mind for Joran.  Tricking him into a confession of truth as to what happened would be what, in my estimation he was doing.  Whoever used the word FRAMING is either using the wrong word or they are trying to FRAME Patrick.     Jack blue


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: katrien on March 05, 2008, 05:09:18 PM
Bram Moszkowicz will be in the Jensen show next week again. He is going to be Mrs. Holloways laywer in the emotional damage.  ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

Oooow Rene Gielen. ::MonkeyCool::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: jackb on March 05, 2008, 05:11:44 PM
This is an interesting bit of info I don't recall hearing about before. Sure hope ALE followed up on this.......
 
>>>>SNIP

Three weeks ago, a tourist from North Carolina called me to ask me how to get in touch with police. She and her husband had been out exploring the island, and they came across a sneaker.

They knew investigators were looking for a pair of sneakers that belonged to van der Sloot. And, they knew the sneaker they spotted probably was just something someone left behind, but they couldn't let it go. She wanted to let police know about it.

http://tinyurl.com/3bkhpb

There was also a woman in North Carolina who started talking about Joran's mother saying NH hit her head and drowned and later recanted saying this.  If it is the same woman.  Arrest her.        jack b


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Jo-An on March 05, 2008, 05:12:22 PM
Robert Jensen Show with Beth Holloway - Peter R de Vries - Patrick van der Eem - Bram Moszkowicz

-Beth: Patrick is a great man, a great father, he's my hero
-Patrick talking about how he wanted to frame Joran, that was his only goal
-Patrick says he has a criminal past but changed drastically after he was about 21 years old, he started selling heroin at the age of 15, he's been in jail twice, drugsrelated
-Patrick talking again about meeting Joran for the first time in the Dutch casino and working towards the confession tapes, getting Joran to trust him
-Patrick says Joran told him he didn't respect his parents, didn't listen to them but that's nothing special for a 20-year old

No new info so far.

Beth was just sitting there the hold whole time, Robert and Patrick only spoke Dutch.

*commercial break*

Self-edit: whole


Thank you, Jo-An. No telephone call from Jensen to the Pimp today? He may be saving that for when Peter is sitting there.


  FRAMING is not a word, I believe Patrick had in mind for Joran.  Tricking him into a confession of truth as to what happened would be what, in my estimation he was doing.  Whoever used the word FRAMING is either using the wrong word or they are trying to FRAME Patrick.     Jack blue

You're probably right! English is not my 1st language and I was listening, translating and typing all at the same time!!  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: mojo on March 05, 2008, 05:12:52 PM
FRAMING is not a word, I believe Patrick had in mind for Joran.  Tricking him into a confession of truth as to what happened would be what, in my estimation he was doing.  Whoever used the word FRAMING is either using the wrong word or they are trying to FRAME Patrick.     Jack blue

perhaps more like putting him in the frame...gotta be one those translation problems!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: JE on March 05, 2008, 05:15:09 PM
Early in the case Tito Lacle a reporter said during his interview with Greta that his sources tell him that authorities are looking for a shoe that Joran lost, possibly in the pond area, and that Joran tried to buy another one to match the shoe he lost. Greta commented that it would have been difficult for Joran to walk home the night of Natalee's disappearance with only one shoe

This is exactly what I recall. There have been various reports though. One at RWV stated that the sneaker found in Jorans closet had mud on it. But what I remember is that ALE found one sneaker with a spot of blood on it in Jorans closet. Never did hear anything about DNA testing yhat might have been done.

++++++++++++++

Natalee Holloway Update: Missing Shoe
I've been informed that at a press conference today investigators have asked anyone that may have information as regards a sneaker - K-SWISS (White and Blue) size 14 possibly seen or found near the Marriott or the Fisherman's Hut area to please contact the Police.
Earlier reports have suggested that a search at the home of Joran Va der Sloot turned up a shoe which may have been covered with mud, or muck. The shoe had no match. The last bit of information hasn't been independently confirmed.
http://www.riehlworldview.com/carnivorous_conservative/2005/07/natalee_hollowa_91.html


On 12-6 BETH told “FoxNews” that early in the investigation, the family was told by the ARUBAN police investigators that blood was found inside a 5-29/30-worn “K-Swiss” brand, size 14, tennis shoe that is predominantly white with some blue trim that belongs to Principal Suspect J. SLOOT that was taken into evidence (the other 5-29/30-worn “K-Swiss” brand, size 14 tennis shoe has--according to the ARUBAN police authorities--has never been found). The ARUBAN police investigators told the family that the found blood inside the tennis shoe taken into evidence would be forensically tested, but, to date, BETH said she does not recall for sure if the ARUBAN police investigators have ever reported about the results of any blood tests, nor have the DUTCH nor the ARUBANS even said if the blood tests have ever been completed on the shoe.

http://members.aol.com/worldJOURNIER/NATALEE/NATALEEtimeline.html


Thanx all for answering my shoe questions this is what i wanted to know:
On 12-6 BETH told “FoxNews” that early in the investigation, the family was told by the ARUBAN police investigators that blood was found inside a 5-29/30-worn “K-Swiss” brand, size 14, tennis shoe that is predominantly white with some blue trim that belongs to Principal Suspect J. SLOOT that was taken into evidence

On jorans june 9th statement he doesnt know if he wore white shoes or creme boots

on june 12th see above beth tells fox about kswiss etc

on june 14th joran states:"I had left a pair of white and blue shoes of the make "K-Swiss", size "14" on the beach"

what's the point of his statement if they found one of the shoes in his home??

 ::MonkeyConfused:: ther's something weird about this shoe story


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: JE on March 05, 2008, 05:17:28 PM

What i never could figure out is why he started this story about the shoes in the first place. Leaving his shoes at the beach or dumping them in a sewer or whatever only makes him look suspicious. Why did he not just get ridd of the shoes and simply not mention em to anyone. What's the big deal with these shoes. There is also the size 14 versus size 10 issue. It would have been so much easier just not to mention the shoes. Also if there was blood on his shoes that wouldn t that be on his clothes to? Cant imagine he walked home naked


There is only one reason I can think of that he'd change shoe size, JE, and that is to frame someone else. I think his shoes had blood/vomit DNA evidence on them and he had to get rid of them, but to switch sizes would mean he needed to deflect suspicion to somebody else with a different shoe size in case his were found.

To frame or protect someone else. I wonder what size shoes the other suspects have


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: caesu on March 05, 2008, 05:21:58 PM
very good to watch patrick.

especially about how the tabloids are discrediting him.
but that doesn't bother him much. he expected that.

nice guy patrick. i really believe that.

also at the end when robert said to beth, nice to sit here with your hero's
patrick said and beth is a supermom.

now bram mosko is on pauw/witteman.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Rob on March 05, 2008, 05:24:00 PM
Thanks caesu, Jo-An, and JE. Hope I didn't miss anyone. ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: JE on March 05, 2008, 05:26:46 PM
Going on about the shoes (srry all) Lets assume he lost a shoe during whatever activity. Would he be so stupid as to take the one he has left, including the eventual forensic traces, home and put it in a closet for the police to find??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on March 05, 2008, 05:27:47 PM
Thanks caesu, Jo-An, and JE. Hope I didn't miss anyone. ::MonkeyWink::

I second that motion.It is very gracious of you to post this information.Others have thanked you but i haven't.So thank you for your posts and time.


Keepthefaith


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: JE on March 05, 2008, 05:28:06 PM
Thanks caesu, Jo-An, and JE. Hope I didn't miss anyone. ::MonkeyWink::

rob i didn't contribute to the translations i was busy with shoes LOL
all credit goes to Ceasu and Jo-An


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Rob on March 05, 2008, 05:30:50 PM
Thanks caesu, Jo-An, and JE. Hope I didn't miss anyone. ::MonkeyWink::

rob i didn't contribute to the translations i was busy with shoes LOL
all credit goes to Ceasu and Jo-An

duly noted JE.

I know others feel the same way, but it's a pleasure to have you all here with us and your help is immeasurable. Thank you again to the Dutch posters.

it's my pleasure to know you all...

And

Hi Dayhiker, my brother!!! ^5


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Jo-An on March 05, 2008, 05:31:05 PM
Thanks caesu, Jo-An, and JE. Hope I didn't miss anyone. ::MonkeyWink::

I second that motion.It is very gracious of you to post this information.Others have thanked you but i haven't.So thank you for your posts and time.


Keepthefaith

You're very welcome!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Observer on March 05, 2008, 05:33:29 PM
Going on about the shoes (srry all) Lets assume he lost a shoe during whatever activity. Would he be so stupid as to take the one he has left, including the eventual forensic traces, home and put it in a closet for the police to find??


Very stupid and that doesn't make sense either,his father would have made sure those shoes were nowhere near that house...Everyone knows you can't buy just one shoe! Which leads me to the next question..Why would Freddy feel obligated or volunteer to buy him a new pair of shoes?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Peaches on March 05, 2008, 05:35:55 PM
Thanks caesu, Jo-An, and JE. Hope I didn't miss anyone. ::MonkeyWink::

A big smoochie to y'all for recapping the shows we can't see over here.  I'm glad Beth is out there stirring the pot.  And she looks great doing it. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: bleachedblack on March 05, 2008, 05:38:29 PM
This is an interesting bit of info I don't recall hearing about before. Sure hope ALE followed up on this.......
 
>>>>SNIP

Three weeks ago, a tourist from North Carolina called me to ask me how to get in touch with police. She and her husband had been out exploring the island, and they came across a sneaker.

They knew investigators were looking for a pair of sneakers that belonged to van der Sloot. And, they knew the sneaker they spotted probably was just something someone left behind, but they couldn't let it go. She wanted to let police know about it.

http://tinyurl.com/3bkhpb

There was also a woman in North Carolina who started talking about Joran's mother saying NH hit her head and drowned and later recanted saying this.  If it is the same woman.  Arrest her.        jack b

I know which you are thinking about, the two sound different to me. The people you mention were supposedly friends/acquaintances of the sloots. PVDS allegedly called him and told him the story of Natalee drowning.......hmmmm one early overt attempt to establish a cover-up of what really happened.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Peaches on March 05, 2008, 05:41:14 PM
Going on about the shoes (srry all) Lets assume he lost a shoe during whatever activity. Would he be so stupid as to take the one he has left, including the eventual forensic traces, home and put it in a closet for the police to find??


Very stupid and that doesn't make sense either,his father would have made sure those shoes were nowhere near that house...Everyone knows you can't buy just one shoe! Which leads me to the next question..Why would Freddy feel obligated or volunteer to buy him a new pair of shoes?
(http://bestsmileys.com/oneofakind/1.gif)

We've been all over this one!  There is no good reason for Freddy to offer to buy Joran new shoes unless the shoes that were lost were actually Freddy's.  Freddy is too shrimpy looking to have size 14 feet even in his wildest dreams!

(I love that horse)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Finbar on March 05, 2008, 05:43:17 PM
Yea, yea.

I read where the headmaster of his school mentioned that he said NH hit her head swimming and drowned.

I think it was World Journier's posts.


CAPS, do you own a cat?


I must feed the credit cards.

Fin


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Peaches on March 05, 2008, 05:46:49 PM
Yea, yea.

I read where the headmaster of his school mentioned that he said NH hit her head swimming and drowned.

I think it was World Journier's posts.


CAPS, do you own a cat?


I must feed the credit cards.

Fin

Is that Shango for "I'm going to order Chinese tonight?" ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on March 05, 2008, 05:51:03 PM

******* do you know the date when they were looking for it and where they found the bloody/muddy shoe?
In the beginning of the case they were looking for one shoe only. They had another shoe with mud or blood on it,I forget which one it was. However when they did the pond search  in July,Dompig announced to everyone it was a pair of shoes they were looking for,so I did a double take and many others did at RWV as well. We never heard anything from the initial reports until the search at the Pond.

Somewhere deep in the archives you will see the initial reports of looking for one shoe,I am positive of that! They were trying to find the missing shoe is what we were told in the beginning.
Plus Beth has in her notes about a bloody shoe.I hope Beth writes another book and have it be ALL about aruba and all the run arounds and lies her and the family were told.I also hope she names names of all the ones who dicked them around....start with that total frizzy haired,corupted,lizard skinned,lie regugitating,sun dried skanky *ITCH renHO.I want Chavez to steal that witch from aruba.
 :smt091


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Peaches on March 05, 2008, 05:56:43 PM
Karma, I agree with ya totally.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: WhiskeyGirl on March 05, 2008, 05:56:58 PM
From Diario online today -

Political cartoon "Banana Republic Cu Cum Laude!!"

http://news.diario-aruba.com//images/stories/2008N/maart/3/car.jpg


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Rob on March 05, 2008, 06:03:36 PM
Screen capture from 3-4-2008 show. At least that's how Carpe has it dated.

(http://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p149/Morgan2112_2006/BethHolloway2.jpg)

genoeg is genoeg - enough is enough

Poor Beth, she was crying here.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Jo-An on March 05, 2008, 06:04:38 PM
Pauw & Witteman Show - Bram Moszkowicz is one of 3 guests

-Short clip of Beth talking about filing criminal and civil lawsuit against Joran (just a very short introduction video, recorded in Bram's office)
-(other guests... yaddayaddayadda... blahblahblah... ticktock ticktock...)
-a middleman contacted Bram on Beth's behalf, to investigate whether they can file a civil lawsuit
-Beth on tape, wants that Joran will be prosecuted, wants Joran behing bars, if that doesn't happen then civil action, there may be other young females on his path
-Bram says he's investigating civil suit: 85-90% chance that he will do it
-he needs to see if he has a true chance to win, Beth couldn't handle it if even the civil suit should be lost
-he says what Joran did in the tapes was confess, even if some people (OM Aruba) say he didn't, there's no doubt about it
-civil suit will be: 1)claim for shock damage 2)claim because of Joran's constant lying he was enabling others to put the blame on Beth (as in Beth was a "suspect" for a while)
-shock damage has to be confirmed by a psychiatrist, he has to determine that Beth suffered psychological damage
-What else do they want in Aruba? They have all they need!, says Bram
-They didn't have enough evidence without the confession tapes, and now even with the confession tapes they don't have enough evidence, Bram says that is simply unbelievable
-Beth on tape: imitating seizure, that's the part that's most difficult to watch
-Bram says he's extra motivated to do this case, he really feels for Beth
-Bram will file a complaint should the case be closed again in Aruba and Joran doesn't get arrested
-Bram promised Beth he will let her know whether he will file the civil suit within 2 weeks

My eyes and ears are spinning, this was a very hard conversation to follow even in Dutch, all these legal terms...

I'm off to bed now!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Rob on March 05, 2008, 06:08:27 PM
Good Night Jo-An and thank you for the summaries.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Observer on March 05, 2008, 06:09:28 PM
Thanks Jo-An..It is much Appreciated!

Bram sounds like da Man! All we need now is a Hero to step up in that Dutch Govt!  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Silverfox on March 05, 2008, 06:13:07 PM
We need to get this right:

No matter what Mos says Joran is no longer a suspect.

Joran was released as a suspect in December and can not be watched, listened to, or surveiled.

Until Joran is rearrested under suspision of a crime, he can not legally be a suspect.

Joran can not be rearrested until physical evidence or a verifiable witness can be found.

Joran is free of judicial suspision and is in no way a legal suspect.

Joran has not been charged with a crime and there is not and may never be a trial date.

The only effect on Joran is that he is a "persona non grata"


I dont agree with it but thats how it is, under their system.

That being the case then, Under Dutch law shouldn't Beth and her attorney be given full access to the investgative records and police reports?

Further, does this not make Joran a "public" (pubic) figure by his own doing and subject to full public scrutiny?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on March 05, 2008, 06:13:27 PM
Karma, I agree with ya totally.
Sorry for the rant but I do feel better now.
 ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: texasmom on March 05, 2008, 06:13:37 PM
thanks Jo-An! ::MonkeyDance::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: ciskebab on March 05, 2008, 06:14:37 PM
They didn't have enough evidence without the confession tapes, and now even with the confession tapes they don't have enough evidence, Bram says that is simply unbelievable

correction that has to be did


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Anna on March 05, 2008, 06:15:21 PM

******* do you know the date when they were looking for it and where they found the bloody/muddy shoe?

I think I remember Beth saying that they found the one shoe in Joran's closet
and it had blood on it.

She most definetly said that and Beth added she never knew if they tested it or not or any results.

******* magnolia thx for your answers. I d still like to know a date if anyone has one. Shoe in closet size 14....mmm
JVDS has size 10.5 You dont suppose it could be someone elses shoe do you?


JE,

I guess we each have our theories as to what was up with the shoes.  I think they could have served a variety of things for Joran.

For one, he could go back Monday evening when he walked the route they supposedly drove in the beach area (what was he looking for?  Evidence, something they threw out the window or what?) and planted shoes at the Fisherman's Huts to "prove" his beach story was true.  He had just come from the Racket Club where he could have found/stolen the shoes.  Right brand, wrong size but who's to know that?

Then after planting the shoes to "prove" his FHut story, he says he asked first Deepak then Satish to go back and get his shoes.  Claims they both agreed to do so.  This means he told them that night and that would also be telling them that Natalee was alone on the beach.  Meaning the Kalpoes were in fact the last to be with her and not Joran. 

So we have the shoes proving Joran was at the beach when he may or may not have been and also that the Kalpoes went back for the shoes meaning they were "really" the last with Natalee instead of Joran.

It was a Dutch juvenile interrogator who determined Joran was in jail wearing not a Size 14 shoe at all but a 10.5.  So did Joran find/steal size 14's to use for his ruse.  Poster Adoron came up with that theory that perhaps Joran "found" a pair, right brand wrong size at Racketclub.

So in the beginning the shoes served two functions for Joran.  Placed him at the FHuts and implicated Kalpoes as last with Natalee.

Now he seems to have had a change of heart concerning the Kalpoes being framed as last to be with Natalee.  So he has himself disposing of the shoes on the way home.

Evidently he is now hoping the Kalpoes win their suit and are generous.

But why bring them up again to Patrick?  Since no one found the shoes on the beach and he was not able to prove the Kalpoes went back for them placing them last with Natalee, why did he start over again with the shoes to Patrick?

Here is an article Jossy wrote on the shoes and the changing size:


Case of Natalee: report shows formal deceit
Joran van der Sloot’s feet grow and shrink almost 4 sizes from one day to the otherDIARIO Aruba
05/08/2006



ORANJESTAD (AAN) --- Those of a little advanced or respectable age can still remember the time where there was an alcoholic beverage that was called ‘foot sweller’.

This alcoholic beverage, it was said, that those who drank too much of it, their feet swelled and because of this they called the drink ‘foot sweller’, but who can believe that in the year 2005 there are people in Aruba whose feet really swell or grow almost 4 sizes from one day to the other?

This was the case of the suspect Joran van der Sloot, who is currently peacefully studying in Holland and Aruba itself is stuck with the case of Natalee, and in the US they are trying in every way to organize and implement all sorts of boycotts and acts that could harm Aruba in the wide sense of the word.



This is not an attempt to cast guilt on Joran van der Sloot in the case of Natalee, but the fact is that the majority of people in the community is very angry in regards to the case of Natalee causing a negative impact on the economic situation, the image of the people of Aruba and surely, for the island’s tourism.


Too many changing declarations, formal deceit by the suspects and the very strange way in which the authorities, who have to be competent, have proceeded have today stuck Aruba in a very bad situation in regards to Natalee’s case and those who know the truth remain quiet believing that in this way, they can evade guilt of any involvement or any violation of the law.

From the copies of different police reports, today readers themselves can read how Joran van der Sloot, who until today for inexplicable reasons ‘supposedly’ left his expensive brand name running shoes at the beach on the night he was with Natalee, according to the version he gave police.

Police came up with the matter of the running shoes or it was Joran himself who started talking about the running shoes of an expensive brand name, size 14? From the police report of June 14, 2005, readers can read how Joran himself declared that he took off his size 14 running shoes and left them on the beach.

On June 29, 2005, he again repeated to police that he left his size 14 running shoes on the beach. The strange thing is that on August 2, 2005, after so many interrogations had already taken place, Joran van der Sloot in a car heading back to KIA, told a Dutch police officer who came to Aruba especially to interrogate the suspects, that Joran had on some K-Swiss running shoes that he borrowed from a fellow prisoner.

At no moment did the Dutch police officer ask Joran something, it was Joran himself who started talking with the police officer, as can been seen from the police report.

Now, the question is: was Joran brought from the first day to KIA shoeless and had no shoes to wear that it was a fellow prisoner who had to lend Joran a pair of running shoes?

Van der Sloot’s parents couldn’t bring shoes for Joran to wear, and someone from the prison had to lend him some shoes, and to top it all off they were K-Swiss brand?

By the way, at KIA they have to register, as in the majority of prisons around the world, what shoes and other belongings each person comes in with, yes or no? On August 8, 2005, the same Dutch police officer asked Joran to take off his shoe, which was a K-Swiss brand running shoe.

Joran asked to see his lawyer and wanted to find his lawyer’s support, but his lawyer didn’t even look at Joran and started to write (in local dialect, you deal with your problems!) After the Dutch police officer insisted, Joran took off the running shoe and handed it over across the table.

The police officer asked Joran how in the supposed day that he was with Natalee on the beach, he had size 14 K-Swiss running shoes, then how was the one that Joran put on the table size 10.5?

After Joran put his running shoe back on, the police pressed on the tip of the running shoes, and observed that the shoes were a good fit on Joran, and Joran didn’t react!

The matter of the size 14 K-Swiss running shoes is ‘too good to be true’. Was it the shark that Natalee supposedly wanted to see at the North shore that left with Joran van der Sloot’s size 14 running shoes?


// posted by Getagrip @ 5/10/2006 04:17:00 PM

http://getagripmonkey.blogspot.com/2006_05_07_archive.html


Until proven otherwise, I will have to go with Jossy on this.

I hope certain posters are not lurking as I have been told I have to eat a bug if I ever mention the shoes again and Robots is not here to do it for me this time!

.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: WhiskeyGirl on March 05, 2008, 06:18:14 PM

******* do you know the date when they were looking for it and where they found the bloody/muddy shoe?
In the beginning of the case they were looking for one shoe only. They had another shoe with mud or blood on it,I forget which one it was. However when they did the pond search  in July,Dompig announced to everyone it was a pair of shoes they were looking for,so I did a double take and many others did at RWV as well. We never heard anything from the initial reports until the search at the Pond.

Somewhere deep in the archives you will see the initial reports of looking for one shoe,I am positive of that! They were trying to find the missing shoe is what we were told in the beginning.

This period on Aruba is known as the summer of "The Great Shoe Scare".  All shoes were suspect, none stepped forward.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Rob on March 05, 2008, 06:20:04 PM
They didn't have enough evidence without the confession tapes, and now even with the confession tapes they don't have enough evidence, Bram says that is simply unbelievable

correction that has to be did

Thanks ciskebab...

you know, the Sloots want Natalee on that beach for a reason and if she is ever found there will be some 'new' reason why Joran is not guilty.

I agree with Bram ~ unbelievable.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Rob on March 05, 2008, 06:31:28 PM
I hate to be so cynical, but at some point it almost seems as if Joran will say he was never on the beach with Natalee... and everyone will say WTF!!! ::MonkeyEek::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 05, 2008, 06:32:43 PM
Didn't someone claim Yoran passed their house covered in mud from waist down in the wee hours of the morning?Shoe stuck in the mud?

Dave Holloway's words support my theory ... my theory that contends that when Joran, Deepak and (?) realized that Natalee was most likely deceased ... left her hidden in the Mangrove bushes ... ran across the street to the Racquet Ball Club where Deepak had parked his vehicle.  A panicked discussion ensued.  Paulus was contacted.  The gardener made his observation.

Janet

+++++++++++

Dave Holloway
NANCY GRACE
August 1, 2005[


http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0508/01/ng.01.html

DAVE HOLLOWAY, NATALEE HOLLOWAY`S FATHER: Well, what they were doing, I think, was the pond that they drained, they feel like possibly he may have been cutting across the beach, back to the racquet club, and got stuck in the mud and lost his shoes.

That`s the only plausible explanation I could think of. The police have not told me specifically what the reasoning is, but, as you`re well aware, the gardener pinpointed them at the racquet club in her vehicle. So I think the shoes may have been lost, maybe cutting across the field from the beach area.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: caesu on March 05, 2008, 06:34:54 PM
i found pauw/witteman with bram mosko exceptionally interesting.

it is late here now so i haven't got time to type much.

if there is no full transcript by tomorrow i will give it a try.
some words are really important to get translated correctly because it is all 'law-talk'.
he chooses his words very carefully of course. that shouldn't get lost in translation


bram mosko is 85-90% sure that he is going to take up to case.
his team is looking at it if the civil case has a chance of succeeding, because a victory for joran would be a disaster for beth. that just can't happen.
in two weeks time he is going to say if he is taking the case.
but he feels for beth he said at the end.
also a few clips of beth were taped while she was at bram mosko law office in amtsterdam.
(so i doubt she will go in pauw/witteman the coming days)

also if the OM drops the case he is going to sue the aruban OM. or protest it in some way. i don't know if it is actually called suing.

important thing is if the confession is as such that joran can be blamed for the shock caused to beth by not telling all these years what happened to her daughter.
he made a few strong points why the confession crucial.

for example he said. they did arrest joran before but they didn't have enough on him, but then they arrested him again and again they had to let him ago. they must have had reasons to arrest him twice.
so why is a confession not enough to get him arrested?? that was exactly what they needed?

there is a lot more. he made three seperate points but i can't think how to put it down right now, i don't want to confuse.

very much worth watching imo overall. i think even more now that we've got a good one with bram mosko.

tomorrow you can watch the show here:
http://pauwenwitteman.vara.nl/uitzending.php?id=318
and in a few hours already here:
http://www.uitzendinggemist.nl/index.php/search?serID=1426&sq=pauw+witteman
05-03-2008 (third from the top probably)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: WhiskeyGirl on March 05, 2008, 06:35:23 PM
They didn't have enough evidence without the confession tapes, and now even with the confession tapes they don't have enough evidence, Bram says that is simply unbelievable

correction that has to be did

Thanks ciskebab...

you know, the Sloots want Natalee on that beach for a reason and if she is ever found there will be some 'new' reason why Joran is not guilty.

I agree with Bram ~ unbelievable.

I wonder if they thought to link the homeless, chollars, drug runners, or fishermen to the disappearance?

It would be a simple thing to do.  However, some fishermen stepped forward to indicate they did not see J2K or Natalee on the beach.

I wonder just what their PVs, witness statements, or testimony before the judge stated?  What did they see that morning?  Who did they see on the beach?  Perhaps their were others that did not see J2K?

Were the fishermen together as a group (2 or 3)?  Or, did one person step forward and implicate others that morning? 

Is it the statement of a group?  Is it two or three statements of individuals, each with a different perspective? 

Who are the fishermen?  Are they still on the island?  Still alive?

My other question, what did J2K argue about before the judge, as told by Dompig?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Observer on March 05, 2008, 06:37:36 PM
That`s the only plausible explanation I could think of. The police have not told me specifically what the reasoning is, but, as you`re well aware, the gardener pinpointed them at the racquet club in her vehicle. So I think the shoes may have been lost, maybe cutting across the field from the beach area.
(http://i198.photobucket.com/albums/aa118/Observer00000007/pond.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 05, 2008, 06:47:43 PM
Didn't someone claim Yoran passed their house covered in mud from waist down in the wee hours of the morning?Shoe stuck in the mud?

Dave Holloway's words support my theory ... my theory that contends that when Joran, Deepak and (?) realized that Natalee was most likely deceased ... left her hidden in the Mangrove bushes ... ran across the street to the Racquet Ball Club where Deepak had parked his vehicle.  A panicked discussion ensued.  Paulus was contacted.  The gardener made his observation.

Janet

+++++++++++

THE POND - THE MUD

Dave Holloway
NANCY GRACE
August 1, 2005[


http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0508/01/ng.01.html

DAVE HOLLOWAY, NATALEE HOLLOWAY`S FATHER: Well, what they were doing, I think, was the pond that they drained, they feel like possibly he may have been cutting across the beach, back to the racquet club, and got stuck in the mud and lost his shoes.

That`s the only plausible explanation I could think of. The police have not told me specifically what the reasoning is, but, as you`re well aware, the gardener pinpointed them at the racquet club in her vehicle. So I think the shoes may have been lost, maybe cutting across the field from the beach area.


THE POND - THE MUD (Continued)

Dave Holloway
'Rita Cosby Live & Direct'
February 23, 2006


COSBY: Dave, do you buy that, he couldn't go back to get his own sneakers because he was going home?

HOLLOWAY: No. You're not going to leave your sneakers on the beach, and you're not in that big of a hurry. So I don't buy that idea at all. If he got rid of his sneakers, it's two things. Either they were too muddy or he lost them somewhere in the mud or whatever, or they had blood on them.


Roy Tromp
CNN
August 2, 2005


http://edition.cnn.com/2005/LAW/08/01/aruba.missing/index.html

ORANJESTAD, Aruba (CNN) -- Aruban authorities investigating the disappearance of Alabama teenager Natalee Holloway are looking for a pair of size-14 tennis shoes that suspect Joran van der Sloot might have lost, a police official said.

"He says he might have lost a pair of sneakers on the beach the night Natalee disappeared," said lead police investigator Roy Tromp. "That's what he claims in one of his many statements."

Tromp said the 17-year-old suspect described the shoes as white and blue and brand new.

"He claimed he lost them in the area of Fisherman's Hut, but we [are] looking at other places, including the pond," he said.  

The pond was drained last week after a witness said he had seen Van der Sloot and two other named suspects -- brothers Satish and Deepak Kalpoe -- nearby. Authorities said Saturday they found nothing in the pond.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 05, 2008, 06:55:00 PM
Beth Twitty
On the Record w/ Greta
December 6, 2005


TWITTY: You know Greta now that you mention it I was looking through my journal and there was an update from an FBI official and also from our family liaison that in one of Joran Van der Sloot's tennis shoes there was blood. I had written that down. I wish that I had been able to obtain more information as to what happened to that one shoe if that was truly blood in his shoe. You know Greta like I said we are just so limited in any type of information we can get.

VAN SUSTEREN: : Are you suggesting that they did find one of the pair of shoes and that they seized that?

TWITTY: Yes, when I was looking back through my notes there was a date where we received this information either from the FBI or our family liaison that there was blood in Joran's tennis shoe.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: JE on March 05, 2008, 07:00:25 PM

******* do you know the date when they were looking for it and where they found the bloody/muddy shoe?

I think I remember Beth saying that they found the one shoe in Joran's closet
and it had blood on it.

She most definetly said that and Beth added she never knew if they tested it or not or any results.

******* magnolia thx for your answers. I d still like to know a date if anyone has one. Shoe in closet size 14....mmm
JVDS has size 10.5 You dont suppose it could be someone elses shoe do you?


JE,

I guess we each have our theories as to what was up with the shoes.  I think they could have served a variety of things for Joran.............................



Anna very elaborate wow thx a lot

Incriminating kalpoes could be a reason. But what would be the point. it would be his word against theirs unless they decided to get the shoes for him and not return em and the police would find em at their home.

It is strange that in his PV he asks deepak or satish after they drop him off to go get the shoes??????

Leaving the shoes there to prove he was at the beach could make sense but then why did they tell the HI story first. Surely he could not have expected them to be there when he changed his story days later.

And why bring it up again with Patrick? Im puzzeled here too.

I ve been searching for an article or anything that says the police found one of the shoes in his home but i cant find it if anyone has it plz let me know.

And about letting Kalpoes off the hook so they can go ahead with their claim and be "nice" to him would imply that he knew about being taped while in the car with patrick.

It is strange that what he says on tape is not enough for a conviction because it is all lies. But to Kalpoes lawyers it seems to prove that their clients are not guilty and can pursue their claim????



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: dennisintn on March 05, 2008, 07:02:49 PM
I hate to be so cynical, but at some point it almost seems as if Joran will say he was never on the beach with Natalee... and everyone will say WTF!!! ::MonkeyEek::
[/quote

everyone except the aruban judges.  they'll just write it off as another lie, shrug their shoulders and say to mos, "too bad, not enough to convict".
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Anna on March 05, 2008, 07:10:33 PM
Thanks to all for the terrofic translations.  We understand it is difficult and English is not your first language.

I wonder what we should write to Hero Brinkman concerning.  I have had excellent responses to emails sent to several high ranking officials in this investigation and want to be very careful in contacting him to impress him as a serious inquirer.

Has someone already directed him to our own Corruption and Collusion Thread?  How about the Murder and Crime thread?  Those might be good places to start?



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Lala'sMom on March 05, 2008, 07:12:51 PM
Why was Joran in the driver's seat when the gardener saw them in the car?

(Yes, a dumb question..humor me.)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Anna on March 05, 2008, 07:19:32 PM

Anna very elaborate wow thx a lot

Incriminating kalpoes could be a reason. But what would be the point. it would be his word against theirs unless they decided to get the shoes for him and not return em and the police would find em at their home.

It is strange that in his PV he asks deepak or satish after they drop him off to go get the shoes??????

Leaving the shoes there to prove he was at the beach could make sense but then why did they tell the HI story first. Surely he could not have expected them to be there when he changed his story days later.

And why bring it up again with Patrick? Im puzzeled here too.

I ve been searching for an article or anything that says the police found one of the shoes in his home but i cant find it if anyone has it plz let me know.

And about letting Kalpoes off the hook so they can go ahead with their claim and be "nice" to him would imply that he knew about being taped while in the car with patrick.

It is strange that what he says on tape is not enough for a conviction because it is all lies. But to Kalpoes lawyers it seems to prove that their clients are not guilty and can pursue their claim????



I think Joran was implying the Kalpoes went back to get the shoes and found Natalee alone and they were last with her and did "something bad to her."  Instead of Joran.

If you read the transcripts of the HI, even Deepak at that time mentions shoes then takes it back.  Said he shot off his mouth about them to one someone then said he was talking about something else.  This is because they were not yet telling the FH story.

Evidently Joran, when questioned alone for the very first time was already telling the FHut story because ALE asked the Kalpoes about dropping him off at the beach while Kalpoes were still saying HI.  Another attempt by Joran to frame them and appear that he, Joran, was the only one telling the truth.

Joran had to have already told the ALE about the FH beach story for them to be asking the Kalpoes immediately about it.  It seems the minute the Kalpoes were out of sight, Joran was telling ALE FHut story instead of HI, hanging the K2 out to dry, he hoped.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Anna on March 05, 2008, 07:23:56 PM
I think the family and media were told things in the beginning that may or may not have always been true.  There was the spot of blood on Joran's shoe that was either never tested or was and it was determined to be Joran's own blood.

And the rumor also that he had a sizable cut on his left foot still when he was finally arrested.

Things like this I don't think we will ever know for a fact what happened, only what a particular individual said at the time. 

In other words, I am now convinced that ALE lied and lied deliberately to this family.  Not all of them but certainly some in a position to know better.  Or maybe they were overwhelmed themselves at the amount of information and incapable of keeping fact from rumor themselves.

Sorry way to run an investigation.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Observer on March 05, 2008, 07:24:12 PM
(http://i198.photobucket.com/albums/aa118/Observer00000007/rudy1.jpg)

"The work of the Two Detectives(Castillo and Young) should be looked into seriously"..Dept of Justice Minister Rudy Croes..
(http://i198.photobucket.com/albums/aa118/Observer00000007/thbarf.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Blonde on March 05, 2008, 07:24:14 PM
This is an interesting bit of info I don't recall hearing about before. Sure hope ALE followed up on this.......
 
>>>>SNIP

Three weeks ago, a tourist from North Carolina called me to ask me how to get in touch with police. She and her husband had been out exploring the island, and they came across a sneaker.

They knew investigators were looking for a pair of sneakers that belonged to van der Sloot. And, they knew the sneaker they spotted probably was just something someone left behind, but they couldn't let it go. She wanted to let police know about it.

http://tinyurl.com/3bkhpb

They should have sealed it and took it to our FBI, Aruba will toss it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: WhiskeyGirl on March 05, 2008, 07:26:50 PM
From RWV - press conference about shoe -

Quote
Sunday, July 31, 2005
Natalee Holloway Update: Missing Shoe

I've been informed that at a press conference today investigators have asked anyone that may have information as regards a sneaker - K-SWISS (White and Blue) size 14 possibly seen or found near the Marriott or the Fisherman's Hut area to please contact the Police.
Earlier reports have suggested that a search at the home of Joran Va der Sloot turned up a shoe which may have been covered with mud, or muck. The shoe had no match. The last bit of information hasn't been independently confirmed.
Sunday, July 31, 2005 at 05:53 PM in Natalee Holloway | Permalink


http://www.riehlworldview.com/carnivorous_conservative/2005/07/natalee_hollowa_91.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Anna on March 05, 2008, 07:29:24 PM
Judge Wit is on record, I think in that same article where he said Dompig and Karen Janssen never asked for a full search of the Sloot compound, that now it would take a confession from Joran.

Well, he has it now and that's still not enough.

Oh, right!  Joran only confessed to disposal of a corpse because he is fully and legally a coroner now!

In Aruba 17 yo punks can declare you are dead and dump you in the drink and it's a misdemeanor.

And Hans doesn't seem to like the latest drug reports?  I wonder if he read the one from our DOJ saying one in five used cocaine in Aruba.  Remove the elderly and children and that's a high percentage of adults.

He wants to know of what that is based?  Tsk, tsk, Hans that goes to methods and sources and we don't tell those.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Observer on March 05, 2008, 07:29:58 PM
Why was Joran in the driver's seat when the gardener saw them in the car?

(Yes, a dumb question..humor me.)

My first guess would be they were taking turns with Natalee in the back seat,I doubt Deepak would let Joran drive so he was just sitting there temporarily. Second guess would be they saw lights from the gardners car coming and they all jumped in the Deepak's car,so they were not seen doing whatever outside of the vehicle. Third guess would be they were waiting for someone or killing time until whoever was done with Natalee if she was not in the vehicle.

If the Gardner is not lying,something Major was happening right when he went by them. If Natalee was safely somewhere else there would be no reason for them to be so paranoid when he drove by.IMO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: JE on March 05, 2008, 07:36:32 PM
I think the family and media were told things in the beginning that may or may not have always been true.  There was the spot of blood on Joran's shoe that was either never tested or was and it was determined to be Joran's own blood.

And the rumor also that he had a sizable cut on his left foot still when he was finally arrested.

Things like this I don't think we will ever know for a fact what happened, only what a particular individual said at the time. 

In other words, I am now convinced that ALE lied and lied deliberately to this family.  Not all of them but certainly some in a position to know better.  Or maybe they were overwhelmed themselves at the amount of information and incapable of keeping fact from rumor themselves.

Sorry way to run an investigation.

Anna thx again for the explanation. Im gonna let the shoe story simmer for a while there's something i just cant put my finger on. Oh and BTW if they make you eat a bug for bringing it on again just give half of it to me LOL


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: WhiskeyGirl on March 05, 2008, 07:38:14 PM
Shoe speculation here -

http://edition.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0508/01/ng.01.html

and

Quote
GRACE: To Jossy Mansur. What is it exactly, Jossy, they`re looking for in the pond? We know this pond had very little water in it at the time Natalee went missing, so it`s not a body.

MANSUR: I don`t know what they`re looking for. Some say a shoe. I don`t know what kind of a shoe. But from the information that we have from the police, they are looking for a body somewhere near there.

GRACE: OK. Very quickly, Susan Candiotti, please explain to us what is taking so long to drain the pond.

CANDIOTTI: Well, part of the problem, as I understand it, is that there`s ground water. I mean, we`re very close -- that pond is very close to the ocean here, I mean, a few hundred yards, let`s say. And so even though they`re draining, draining, draining, draining, I think that is part of the problem. That`s how Equusearch is explaining it. And so those pumps are going around the clock even as we speak, over my shoulder, but it`s too dark to tell. They`ve got some lights going on. So they`re trying the best they can to get it out.

Now, earlier today, they did bring in some equipment, including equipment that can determine methane gas, the presence of methane gas, which might indicate a body being present. But it turned up nothing. They`re going to try again tomorrow.

GRACE: Yes, when a body decomposes, it releases methane gas.

We`ll all be right back. We are live in Aruba.

http://edition.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0507/29/ng.01.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Anna on March 05, 2008, 07:39:24 PM
SAN ANTONIO, Venezuela, March 5 (Reuters) - Trade between Colombia and Venezuela was limited to bare necessities on Wednesday, with Venezuela only allowing in perishable goods as tensions remained high in the Andean region's worst diplomatic crisis in years.

Venezuela on Wednesday sent tanks to the Colombian border to protest a Colombian military raid that killed a rebel commander in Ecuadorean territory, sparking the outrage of Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez who says the move could lead to war.

Analysts say continued border restrictions could worsen Venezuela's nagging shortages of basic groceries and add to inflation that is already the highest on the continent.

http://uk.reuters.com/article/oilRpt/idUKN0536287320080305


And don't forget that the U. S. backed Colombian army is far superior in every regard to anything Hugo or his buddies have.  It would be an unmitigated disaster for him should actual combat break out.  That's the last thing he wants.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 05, 2008, 07:39:46 PM
Why was Joran in the driver's seat when the gardener saw them in the car?

(Yes, a dumb question..humor me.)

Just speculating.

Maybe ... upon arriving at Deepak's parked vehicle after leaving an apparently deceased Natalee at the beach ... Joran, Deepak and (?) noticed the lights of the gardener's vehicle approaching and ... scrambled to get inside Deepak's vehicle ... seating was not a priority.

Janet

+++++++++


Jossy Mansur
NANCY GRACE
July 27, 2005


http://edition.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0506/10/ng.01.htm

JOSSY MANSUR, MANAGING EDITOR, "DIARIO": Well, he spoke very clearly of what he saw. He left his home, a standard home, where he lives really. And he was on his way to a room that he has at the house that he works as a gardener because that room has air-conditioning and it was very hot. When he left his home, he had to pass on the dirt road close to that pond that`s being drained now. And there was a car parked smack in the middle of that road, so he had to pass it at a very slow pace, climbing a little mound, and brought him within a yard of view in sight of the other car.

And he claims to have seen Joran behind the wheel, one of the two Kalpoe brothers beside him and the other Kalpoe brother in the back. And when they saw him pass that close, Joran threw up his hands to hide his face, and the other two ducked on the seats.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 05, 2008, 07:41:18 PM

duly noted JE.

I know others feel the same way, but it's a pleasure to have you all here with us and your help is immeasurable. Thank you again to the Dutch posters.

it's my pleasure to know you all...

And

Hi Dayhiker, my brother!!! ^5


Good to see you brudder and ditto on the call out to our Dutch friends. It is great to have them here and a breath of fresh air to have a fine group who are all on the same page as opposed to some in the past who have tried to derail the case by taking up for corrupt Aruban officials.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: JE on March 05, 2008, 07:43:41 PM
From RWV - press conference about shoe -

Quote
Sunday, July 31, 2005
Natalee Holloway Update: Missing Shoe

I've been informed that at a press conference today investigators have asked anyone that may have information as regards a sneaker - K-SWISS (White and Blue) size 14 possibly seen or found near the Marriott or the Fisherman's Hut area to please contact the Police.
Earlier reports have suggested that a search at the home of Joran Va der Sloot turned up a shoe which may have been covered with mud, or muck. The shoe had no match. The last bit of information hasn't been independently confirmed.
Sunday, July 31, 2005 at 05:53 PM in Natalee Holloway | Permalink


http://www.riehlworldview.com/carnivorous_conservative/2005/07/natalee_hollowa_91.html

Thx WhiskeyGirl too bad it doesn't say who the I as in "I ve been informed is" it would be great to have an article where it says police found it at sloots home. The first sloot home search was on june 15th


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 05, 2008, 07:46:54 PM

What i never could figure out is why he started this story about the shoes in the first place. Leaving his shoes at the beach or dumping them in a sewer or whatever only makes him look suspicious. Why did he not just get ridd of the shoes and simply not mention em to anyone. What's the big deal with these shoes. There is also the size 14 versus size 10 issue. It would have been so much easier just not to mention the shoes. Also if there was blood on his shoes that wouldn t that be on his clothes to? Cant imagine he walked home naked


There is only one reason I can think of that he'd change shoe size, JE, and that is to frame someone else. I think his shoes had blood/vomit DNA evidence on them and he had to get rid of them, but to switch sizes would mean he needed to deflect suspicion to somebody else with a different shoe size in case his were found.

To frame or protect someone else. I wonder what size shoes the other suspects have


Joran most likely lied about his shoe size just in case they ever did find his shoes in the culvert or wherever he stashed them. I remember Peter really hammered this lie and thought it was very significant. Once again, I can't see Joran mentioning it to Patrick unless it had some real significance, otherwise why even bring it up?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: WhiskeyGirl on March 05, 2008, 07:49:12 PM
From RWV - press conference about shoe -

Quote
Sunday, July 31, 2005
Natalee Holloway Update: Missing Shoe

I've been informed that at a press conference today investigators have asked anyone that may have information as regards a sneaker - K-SWISS (White and Blue) size 14 possibly seen or found near the Marriott or the Fisherman's Hut area to please contact the Police.
Earlier reports have suggested that a search at the home of Joran Va der Sloot turned up a shoe which may have been covered with mud, or muck. The shoe had no match. The last bit of information hasn't been independently confirmed.
Sunday, July 31, 2005 at 05:53 PM in Natalee Holloway | Permalink


http://www.riehlworldview.com/carnivorous_conservative/2005/07/natalee_hollowa_91.html

Thx WhiskeyGirl too bad it doesn't say who the I as in "I ve been informed is" it would be great to have an article where it says police found it at sloots home. The first sloot home search was on june 15th

Would a press conference have been recorded?  Perhaps it was not in the English language? 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 05, 2008, 07:50:46 PM
SAN ANTONIO, Venezuela, March 5 (Reuters) - Trade between Colombia and Venezuela was limited to bare necessities on Wednesday, with Venezuela only allowing in perishable goods as tensions remained high in the Andean region's worst diplomatic crisis in years.

Venezuela on Wednesday sent tanks to the Colombian border to protest a Colombian military raid that killed a rebel commander in Ecuadorean territory, sparking the outrage of Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez who says the move could lead to war.

Analysts say continued border restrictions could worsen Venezuela's nagging shortages of basic groceries and add to inflation that is already the highest on the continent.

http://uk.reuters.com/article/oilRpt/idUKN0536287320080305


And don't forget that the U. S. backed Colombian army is far superior in every regard to anything Hugo or his buddies have.  It would be an unmitigated disaster for him should actual combat break out.  That's the last thing he wants.

.


Can't see many US travel agents wanting to book trips for their clients to an ISLAND WITHIN 30 MILES OF A POTENTIAL WAR ZONE.  Oduber can piss off his front porch and wave to Hugo. This can't be good for any of the ABCs.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 05, 2008, 07:53:51 PM
Pauw & Witteman Show - Bram Moszkowicz is one of 3 guests

-Short clip of Beth talking about filing criminal and civil lawsuit against Joran (just a very short introduction video, recorded in Bram's office)
-(other guests... yaddayaddayadda... blahblahblah... ticktock ticktock...)
-a middleman contacted Bram on Beth's behalf, to investigate whether they can file a civil lawsuit
-Beth on tape, wants that Joran will be prosecuted, wants Joran behing bars, if that doesn't happen then civil action, there may be other young females on his path
-Bram says he's investigating civil suit: 85-90% chance that he will do it
-he needs to see if he has a true chance to win, Beth couldn't handle it if even the civil suit should be lost
-he says what Joran did in the tapes was confess, even if some people (OM Aruba) say he didn't, there's no doubt about it
-civil suit will be: 1)claim for shock damage 2)claim because of Joran's constant lying he was enabling others to put the blame on Beth (as in Beth was a "suspect" for a while)
-shock damage has to be confirmed by a psychiatrist, he has to determine that Beth suffered psychological damage
-What else do they want in Aruba? They have all they need!, says Bram
-They didn't have enough evidence without the confession tapes, and now even with the confession tapes they don't have enough evidence, Bram says that is simply unbelievable
-Beth on tape: imitating seizure, that's the part that's most difficult to watch
-Bram says he's extra motivated to do this case, he really feels for Beth
-Bram will file a complaint should the case be closed again in Aruba and Joran doesn't get arrested
-Bram promised Beth he will let her know whether he will file the civil suit within 2 weeks

My eyes and ears are spinning, this was a very hard conversation to follow even in Dutch, all these legal terms...

I'm off to bed now!!



Thanks again Jo-An for your update. GOOD TO SEE BRAM TRASHING THE POS PROSECUTOR!!! Can Peter be far behind with an investigation of the whole sordid bunch? I am sure Beth has much to tell them both.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: dennisintn on March 05, 2008, 07:54:13 PM
(http://i198.photobucket.com/albums/aa118/Observer00000007/rudy1.jpg)

"The work of the Two Detectives(Castillo and Young) should be looked into seriously"..Dept of Justice Minister Rudy Croes..
(http://i198.photobucket.com/albums/aa118/Observer00000007/thbarf.gif)

roflmfao, rudy has elevated the status of the psycho psychics to detective?  why does that not surprise me at all.  sounds like he inhaled some of his tooth powder this morning before going to work.
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Anna on March 05, 2008, 07:57:35 PM
Maybe there was only one Swiss K in the Lost and Found at the Racquet Club was why Joran only had one shoe Size 14.

How hard is it to measure a kid's foot?

But I suppose first one would have to want to know and besides, it's easier to blame the American media for failure to perform at even the most minimal of universally accepted standards.

Things like that require bending over and stretching which interferes with the Frosted Flakes agenda.

moo


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Observer on March 05, 2008, 07:58:41 PM
I thought this post would interest some of you..lol I would imagine that Johan grabbed this from one of the posters at Rene'e Gielens blog that she post's at... I seriously doubt SandraK is Astrid VR but the part about Lorenzo's GF may be true as Glenda refused to answer that question from HannieC  ::MonkeyWink::


de moeder van Lorenzo

De moeder van Lorenzo, Astrid van Rijn, actief is als poster op een aantal websites (als SandraK en Keywest). Zij gaf onlangs aan dat ze op goede voet staat met Robin Holloway, de vrouw van Dave Holloway. Dit is natuurlijk pikant, nu de ex vriendin van Lorenzo van Rijn zijn alibi op 30 mei 2005 intrekt


(Translation)
The mother of Lorenzo, Astrid van Rijn, operates as a poster on a number of websites (as SandraK and Keywest). She said recently that she is on good footing with Robin Holloway, the wife of Dave Holloway. Of course, this is spicy, now that the former girlfriend of Lorenzo van Rijn withdrew his alibi on May 30, 2005

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2669.100


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 05, 2008, 08:00:10 PM

THE JOGGER

Jossy Mansur
NANCY GRACE
August 23, 2005


http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0508/23/ng.01.html

ANASTASIYA BOLTON, WBMA-TV: ... Also, the jogger, the latest witness that police are talking about -- this is supposedly the man who called police from a public phone several days after Natalee Holloway disappeared, saying that he saw the car with the Kalpoe brothers and Joran by the racquet club the night that she disappeared. Police are still looking for him. They`re not able to find him because the man, again, called from a public phone and did not leave his name -- Nancy.

GRACE: You know, that was a question we had last night, Jossy, as to why the Aruban police could not trace that phone call from a jogger, a jogger escaping the heat on the island of Aruba the night Natalee went missing. That`s the apparent explanation of why he was out jogging at that time of the night. Jossy, if this is true and he called from a public phone, true, police cannot trace who he is, but it would also give credence. Was that public phone near where Natalee Holloway disappeared?

JOSSY MANSUR, MANAGING EDITOR, "DIARIO": That`s what I understand, that this jogger also saw the same car parked at the same spot by the racquet club. However, he did call from a public telephone, and I don`t know whether the police can trace it or not. But according to information I have, they cannot.

GRACE: Well, they already know it`s from a public phone. They know where it was. Take a listen to this.

<snipped>

... Jossy, I want to get everything I can from you that you know about this jogger. Could you just tell me, what night is it the jogger calls police about what he saw?

MANSUR: I think it was two or three nights after Natalee disappeared. I don`t know. I don`t have any of the answers to that. I don`t know any of the facts involved. I know that the police have put out a call for him. They`ve requested us to publish it, where we did publish a request for this man to come forward. And they`ve been on the radio and everywhere else, asking for this jogger to show up, to give his testimony.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Shell on March 05, 2008, 08:02:31 PM
I hate to be so cynical, but at some point it almost seems as if Joran will say he was never on the beach with Natalee... and everyone will say WTF!!! ::MonkeyEek::

I hate to be cynical too, but I feel like Joran could confess over and over and tell as many lies and say anything he wants. He seems to be immune from prosecution.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: JE on March 05, 2008, 08:05:29 PM
I hate to be so cynical, but at some point it almost seems as if Joran will say he was never on the beach with Natalee... and everyone will say WTF!!! ::MonkeyEek::

I hate to be cynical too, but I feel like Joran could confess over and over and tell as many lies and say anything he wants. He seems to be immune from prosecution.

No one is immune from prosecution except maybe god i doubt that JVDS is god


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 05, 2008, 08:05:33 PM
Deepak Kalpoe attempts to get somebody to establish an alibi for him after the gardener testifies.

Janet

+++++++++++++++

Beth Twitty
CNN LARRY KING LIVE
February 23, 2007


http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0602/23/lkl.01.html

BETH HOLLOWAY TWITTY: I know one thing that Deepak Kalpoe did in August was, when the gardener came before the judge of instruction to give sworn testimony of witnessing those three suspects together in the Kalpoe brothers' car that night at the pond, across the street from the Marriott, it was in front of the prosecutor, in front of the defense, the judge of instruction, Deepak and Satish Kalpoe, Joran Van Der Sloot.

Deepak panicked. He panicked when the gardener gave that testimony. That very afternoon, he called an Aruban girl to help him establish an alibi. She, in turn, panicked. She called FBI. She dialed the 1-877-NATALEE number and told them that she did not want to be involved in this.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Observer on March 05, 2008, 08:15:40 PM
(http://i198.photobucket.com/albums/aa118/Observer00000007/rudy1.jpg)

roflmfao, rudy has elevated the status of the psycho psychics to detective?  why does that not surprise me at all.  sounds like he inhaled some of his tooth powder this morning before going to work.
dennisintn

Yup,He said that after they gave there press conference on TV and Radio,Probably so people would take them seriously and let them spread there BS all over Holland and Aruba. The next day he kind of backed off a bit after the whole shenanigan backfired and no one thought they were credible with anything.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on March 05, 2008, 08:28:22 PM

******* do you know the date when they were looking for it and where they found the bloody/muddy shoe?
In the beginning of the case they were looking for one shoe only. They had another shoe with mud or blood on it,I forget which one it was. However when they did the pond search  in July,Dompig announced to everyone it was a pair of shoes they were looking for,so I did a double take and many others did at RWV as well. We never heard anything from the initial reports until the search at the Pond.

Somewhere deep in the archives you will see the initial reports of looking for one shoe,I am positive of that! They were trying to find the missing shoe is what we were told in the beginning.

Someone correct me if I'm wrong (although I realize this is like asking a starving mouse to eat a piece of cheese if he sees one :wink: ),

In the tapes with Patrick, didn't Joran say something like the shoes were just a setup of some kind (I was thinking to send people chasing after nothing).  He really seems to get his jollies sending people off chasing clouds and screwing with the investigation, one day he may accidently tell the truth not recognizing it for what it is.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Blonde on March 05, 2008, 08:33:43 PM
This Picture of Beth brakes my heart
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/Beth%20%20Dave%20%20Family/beth08.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: jackb on March 05, 2008, 08:35:41 PM
FRAMING is not a word, I believe Patrick had in mind for Joran.  Tricking him into a confession of truth as to what happened would be what, in my estimation he was doing.  Whoever used the word FRAMING is either using the wrong word or they are trying to FRAME Patrick.     Jack blue

perhaps more like putting him in the frame...gotta be one those translation problems!

Why is the picture (avatar) showing its azz?   jackblue


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: bleachedblack on March 05, 2008, 08:40:48 PM
I thought this post would interest some of you..lol I would imagine that Johan grabbed this from one of the posters at Rene'e Gielens blog that she post's at... I seriously doubt SandraK is Astrid VR but the part about Lorenzo's GF may be true as Glenda refused to answer that question from HannieC  ::MonkeyWink::


de moeder van Lorenzo

De moeder van Lorenzo, Astrid van Rijn, actief is als poster op een aantal websites (als SandraK en Keywest). Zij gaf onlangs aan dat ze op goede voet staat met Robin Holloway, de vrouw van Dave Holloway. Dit is natuurlijk pikant, nu de ex vriendin van Lorenzo van Rijn zijn alibi op 30 mei 2005 intrekt


(Translation)
The mother of Lorenzo, Astrid van Rijn, operates as a poster on a number of websites (as SandraK and Keywest). She said recently that she is on good footing with Robin Holloway, the wife of Dave Holloway. Of course, this is spicy, now that the former girlfriend of Lorenzo van Rijn withdrew his alibi on May 30, 2005

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2669.100

That is very interesting. I do recall it being said early on that Lvr's alibi for that night was that he was having a small private party at his house and that he even had his girlfriend there. Sure wish she would come and chat.....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Anna on March 05, 2008, 08:46:44 PM
I hate to be so cynical, but at some point it almost seems as if Joran will say he was never on the beach with Natalee... and everyone will say WTF!!! ::MonkeyEek::

I hate to be cynical too, but I feel like Joran could confess over and over and tell as many lies and say anything he wants. He seems to be immune from prosecution.

We have said many times that even if they had Joran committing this crime itself on video, he would never go to trial.  There would be some excuse or other to prevent his ever being charged with anything.  After all, he has the power to declare people living or dead, ya know.  And at only 17 with no medical training whatsoever.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Observer on March 05, 2008, 08:47:19 PM

That is very interesting. I do recall it being said early on that Lvr's alibi for that night was that he was having a small private party at his house and that he even had his girlfriend there. Sure wish she would come and chat.....
Yup and Max Arendsz was questioned and provided him with the alibi,I guess for all night and obviously the morning.

If it's true she must have told someone or posted it on the Dutch Blogs somewhere. I wonder where that initial post is coming from?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Anna on March 05, 2008, 08:48:54 PM
Thanks again for all the translations of the Dutch programs.

I am going to try to think of something important enough to contact Hero Brinkman about and ask for his assistance if I can come up with anything.

Off to watch CSI. . . .


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Magnolia on March 05, 2008, 08:54:21 PM
Thanks again for all the translations of the Dutch programs.

I am going to try to think of something important enough to contact Hero Brinkman about and ask for his assistance if I can come up with anything.

Off to watch CSI. . . .

Send him the Freebirds information on the Corrupt Judges....that is as
good as it gets.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: jackb on March 05, 2008, 08:56:34 PM
Karma, I agree with ya totally.

RenHo has so many miles on her they call her retread rollback Renho.

She has had to have that thing retreaded after she got rolled back.    Jackb


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: ocgirl on March 05, 2008, 09:15:14 PM
Hey OE,

Anything new to report?

 ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: jackb on March 05, 2008, 09:24:20 PM
Hey OE,

Anything new to report?

 ::MonkeyWink::

Just that Aruba is going to go broke for giving RenHo the money to get a splif unlift.       jackb


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 05, 2008, 09:54:00 PM
Thank you Carpe.

+++++++++


JENSEN

BETH NATALEE HOLLOWAY ARUBA SEG 1 march 4 2008


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-R9XMu-aXro


2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pNqYvjZCNt0

3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=exh1VcZT6eQ

4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A1V8pMlevac

5
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Om4bQfbg0iw


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: suisse71 on March 05, 2008, 10:26:16 PM
Pauw & Witteman Show - Bram Moszkowicz is one of 3 guests

-Short clip of Beth talking about filing criminal and civil lawsuit against Joran (just a very short introduction video, recorded in Bram's office)
-(other guests... yaddayaddayadda... blahblahblah... ticktock ticktock...)
-a middleman contacted Bram on Beth's behalf, to investigate whether they can file a civil lawsuit
-Beth on tape, wants that Joran will be prosecuted, wants Joran behing bars, if that doesn't happen then civil action, there may be other young females on his path
-Bram says he's investigating civil suit: 85-90% chance that he will do it
-he needs to see if he has a true chance to win, Beth couldn't handle it if even the civil suit should be lost
-he says what Joran did in the tapes was confess, even if some people (OM Aruba) say he didn't, there's no doubt about it
-civil suit will be: 1)claim for shock damage 2)claim because of Joran's constant lying he was enabling others to put the blame on Beth (as in Beth was a "suspect" for a while)
-shock damage has to be confirmed by a psychiatrist, he has to determine that Beth suffered psychological damage
-What else do they want in Aruba? They have all they need!, says Bram
-They didn't have enough evidence without the confession tapes, and now even with the confession tapes they don't have enough evidence, Bram says that is simply unbelievable
-Beth on tape: imitating seizure, that's the part that's most difficult to watch
-Bram says he's extra motivated to do this case, he really feels for Beth
-Bram will file a complaint should the case be closed again in Aruba and Joran doesn't get arrested
-Bram promised Beth he will let her know whether he will file the civil suit within 2 weeks

My eyes and ears are spinning, this was a very hard conversation to follow even in Dutch, all these legal terms...

I'm off to bed now!!



Thanks again Jo-An for your update. GOOD TO SEE BRAM TRASHING THE POS PROSECUTOR!!! Can Peter be far behind with an investigation of the whole sordid bunch? I am sure Beth has much to tell them both.

Many thanks!  I so hope Bram can file the civil suit. Get Joran off the streets!!  I'm not a lawyer but I hope he will be able to delve into all of these missing statements, evidence, etc.  Where the hell is Joran's statement from May 31 '05? Was it actually Paulus making 2 ATM w/d  in the wee hours or was it Joran using daddy's card?  My questions are endless, I'll try not to drive you all nuts.  As for the shoes, why can't Joran answer this simple question?
Even in his Greta interview he made such a point about his KSwiss sneakers, "yes Greta these are the same ones.  Well not the exact same ones that are missing, but they look exactly like these ones..." something to that effect.     

Someone else here posted on an earlier thread, may have been Destiny or *******, so sorry I don't recall, about "Thou dost protest too much...."  Anybody help me here?  I thought that line of thinking was really interesting and made sense.  I agree, Joran had sex (raped) Natalee without a condom and he & Paulus had to get rid of the body.  Also, I do believe Beth that Natalee was a virgin and Joran realized that during the rape. So imagine evidence - Paulus being an attorney of course would say "What have you done?!" 

Forgive me for being graphic, but I'd like to peel the skin of his face too...
Joran raped a virgin & possibly K2 raped her as well
Natalee's blood w/ Joran's semem, vomit w/ GHB & Joran's semen, her DNA all over K2 car (Liquid Ecstasy is often cut w/ herion, which makes the person vomit while slipping in and out of consciousness & GHB causes victim to black out)
Natalee has seizures, overdosing, blacked out, or went into a coma. Paulus researching affects of drugs & alcohol. 
Joran DNA, his semem inside of her and on her person.  Even if they find my semen in her = rape w/ no condom
Joran said in the Dutch version of Devries tape, to Beth & Greta, to Jug & friends on that first night, in his June 24th statement [even here he decribes the same sexual acts in details about another girl & also that 12 year old girl] and Joran and Anita describe in detail her underwear and what Joran did sexuallly with Natalee, etc....(Sorry guys this makes me cringe to even write this.) "I fingered her, I wanted her to give me a blow job, I french kissed her, I f**cked her, I'll just f**ck her.... "
Natalee DNA under Joran's fingernails, on him, his clothes, on & in his shoes....
Natalee fought back, I have to believe that, bit him, scratched, hit him and Joran assaulted her to make her stop.  JK2 put too much emphasis on "her hitting her head..."
Natalee in coma or died or murder
All that evidence would get Joran 15 years to say the least. Obviously there was zero proof of consensual sex.   If all or any of the above is not motivation for Paulus & Joran to get rid of the body, "the body of evidence" then what is?
No body, no crime
I believe Beth, Natalee was at VDS home. 
Paulus w/ help of Van der Stratten buried the body and moved the body more than once.  VDS home, then landfill, then??? Pond?  or Ocean? 
Perhaps some evidence was thrown in the pond, just like Joran did with his dead dog. 
And some thrown in the ocean.
Find body, solve crime.
Solve numerous criminal acts.

Again sorry guys!! but I really want to see the POS behind bars forever along with Paulus who the locals refer to as a "womanizer & gambler".  Like father like son.  Joran is a sociopath to say the least.

With the Aruba follow up piece back on tomorrow, I am curious to know what Patrick said about the pond and review again what CAPS said in his summary. Any news from OE about the scan they did of the pond? 


j4n!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 05, 2008, 10:51:16 PM

Thanks again Jo-An for your update. GOOD TO SEE BRAM TRASHING THE POS PROSECUTOR!!! Can Peter be far behind with an investigation of the whole sordid bunch? I am sure Beth has much to tell them both.

Many thanks!  I so hope Bram can file the civil suit. Get Joran off the streets!!  I'm not a lawyer but I hope he will be able to delve into all of these missing statements, evidence, etc.  Where the hell is Joran's statement from May 31 '05? Was it actually Paulus making 2 ATM w/d  in the wee hours or was it Joran using daddy's card?  My questions are endless, I'll try not to drive you all nuts.  As for the shoes, why can't Joran answer this simple question?
Even in his Greta interview he made such a point about his KSwiss sneakers, "yes Greta these are the same ones.  Well not the exact same ones that are missing, but they look exactly like these ones..." something to that effect.     

Someone else here posted on an earlier thread, may have been Destiny or *******, so sorry I don't recall, about "Thou dost protest too much...."  Anybody help me here?  I thought that line of thinking was really interesting and made sense.  I agree, Joran had sex (raped) Natalee without a condom and he & Paulus had to get rid of the body.  Also, I do believe Beth that Natalee was a virgin and Joran realized that during the rape. So imagine evidence - Paulus being an attorney of course would say "What have you done?!" 

Forgive me for being graphic, but I'd like to peel the skin of his face too...
Joran raped a virgin & possibly K2 raped her as well
Natalee's blood w/ Joran's semem, vomit w/ GHB & Joran's semen, her DNA all over K2 car (Liquid Ecstasy is often cut w/ herion, which makes the person vomit while slipping in and out of consciousness & GHB causes victim to black out)
Natalee has seizures, overdosing, blacked out, or went into a coma. Paulus researching affects of drugs & alcohol. 
Joran DNA, his semem inside of her and on her person.  Even if they find my semen in her = rape w/ no condom
Joran said in the Dutch version of Devries tape, to Beth & Greta, to Jug & friends on that first night, in his June 24th statement [even here he decribes the same sexual acts in details about another girl & also that 12 year old girl] and Joran and Anita describe in detail her underwear and what Joran did sexuallly with Natalee, etc....(Sorry guys this makes me cringe to even write this.) "I fingered her, I wanted her to give me a blow job, I french kissed her, I f**cked her, I'll just f**ck her.... "
Natalee DNA under Joran's fingernails, on him, his clothes, on & in his shoes....
Natalee fought back, I have to believe that, bit him, scratched, hit him and Joran assaulted her to make her stop.  JK2 put too much emphasis on "her hitting her head..."
Natalee in coma or died or murder
All that evidence would get Joran 15 years to say the least. Obviously there was zero proof of consensual sex.   If all or any of the above is not motivation for Paulus & Joran to get rid of the body, "the body of evidence" then what is?
No body, no crime
I believe Beth, Natalee was at VDS home. 
Paulus w/ help of Van der Stratten buried the body and moved the body more than once.  VDS home, then landfill, then??? Pond?  or Ocean? 
Perhaps some evidence was thrown in the pond, just like Joran did with his dead dog. 
And some thrown in the ocean.
Find body, solve crime.
Solve numerous criminal acts.

Again sorry guys!! but I really want to see the POS behind bars forever along with Paulus who the locals refer to as a "womanizer & gambler".  Like father like son.  Joran is a sociopath to say the least.

With the Aruba follow up piece back on tomorrow, I am curious to know what Patrick said about the pond and review again what CAPS said in his summary. Any news from OE about the scan they did of the pond? 


j4n!!!



Hello Suisse and a belated welcome to Monkeyland. I am delighted to see you are well read on those missing statements of Joran's because they are one of the major keys to exposing the corruption.

I'm no expert on Dutch law and we have been told so many lies about it that I doubt I ever will be but from what I understand Bram is a hell of a good lawyer and would know how to demand all the case files.

Getting those files will open up a big old can of whupass on the Aruban officials involved in the corruption. I hope Bram pursues it and I also hopes he gets every dime the Van der Sloots have left. I am surprised they aren't bankrupt by now but assume the Mafia has been paying their legal bills since they have the best Mafia lawyer in the US working for them. Maybe Bram can find that out as discovery in the civil suit.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: sb on March 05, 2008, 10:59:05 PM
I have an impression that Astrid Van Rijn is somewhat educated (owns a business, etc.) SandraK strikes me as having crawled out from under a rock, just yesterday. I find it hard to believe that SandraK is really Lorenzo's mother unless she seriously "dumbs down" her Internet posting style.

I think Beth SHOULD take a shot at a Dutch-originated civil suit against Joran and VDS family. From what limited info I have heard, the burden of proof is even less for a civil suit in Holland than in the US, and certainly the higher burden of proof here still nailed orenthal. If the Fix truly is in from On High, the suit will fail, of course, but nothing ventured, nothing gained.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: BUCKSHOT on March 05, 2008, 11:03:06 PM
We need to get this right:

No matter what Mos says Joran is no longer a suspect.

Joran was released as a suspect in December and can not be watched, listened to, or surveiled.

Until Joran is rearrested under suspision of a crime, he can not legally be a suspect.

Joran can not be rearrested until physical evidence or a verifiable witness can be found.

Joran is free of judicial suspision and is in no way a legal suspect.

Joran has not been charged with a crime and there is not and may never be a trial date.

The only effect on Joran is that he is a "persona non grata"


I dont agree with it but thats how it is, under their system.

The prosecution could have a video tape, made by Freddy and timestamped, with Joran raping and murdering Natalee, given to them and still could not, nor would not, prosecute this case like it would be in any other civilized country in the world.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: BUCKSHOT on March 05, 2008, 11:10:42 PM
Early in the case Tito Lacle a reporter said during his interview with Greta that his sources tell him that authorities are looking for a shoe that Joran lost, possibly in the pond area, and that Joran tried to buy another one to match the shoe he lost. Greta commented that it would have been difficult for Joran to walk home the night of Natalee's disappearance with only one shoe

According to police, he would have hopped home like a bunny in the night, rushing home to take his final exams, but he just couldn't resist a little 'good night' porn with Daury over cookies and warm milk.  ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: BUCKSHOT on March 05, 2008, 11:14:02 PM
Didn't someone claim Yoran passed their house covered in mud from waist down in the wee hours of the morning?Shoe stuck in the mud?

This is the second time I have heard this story, for lack of a better word.

Wonder if there is any validity to it... It would not be out of the question.

Maybe he was searching for red herrings; they only seem to come out late at night.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Ono on March 05, 2008, 11:17:10 PM
Robert Jensen Show with Beth Holloway - Peter R de Vries - Patrick van der Eem - Bram Moszkowicz - Part 2

-Joran texted Patrick even after the confession tapes, Joran texted: "you're even sicker than I am"
-Patrick still has 126 text-messages left on his cell that Joran sent him, about 10 of them after the PRDV-show
-Patrick gives Robert his cellphone, Robert shows one of the messages, it was about drugs
-Robert asks, "can I call Joran?"
-Robert calls Joran, Joran answers but that's all he says, Patrick says Joran usually doesn't answer the phone, lets it go to voicemail
-Patrick doesn't know where Joran is, is not even interested in knowing where he is
-Robert applauding Beth for staying strong throughout this whole time
-enter Peter
-Beth is saying that she always felt that Peter had to be the one that could help her, and he did
-Robert asks what Peter thinks is the most important thing in the tapes: Peter says it's when Joran imitates Natalee's shaking, he did that more than once, in more than one recording,
Peter says that that was really real, that was not a lie
-Peter says Patrick's past is not important at all, what's important is what Joran said
-enter Bram
-Bram is here to talk to Beth after the show, he will be back on the show next week
-Patrick calls Beth a supermom

So no new info, no new developments.


Thanks to all for all the updates! 
All of those guys are heros;   I was so impressed with how kind Mr. Jensen was to Beth during Part One..... Thanks to all who are posting these.  Appreciate it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: BUCKSHOT on March 05, 2008, 11:19:19 PM


The date on wich they found the shoe and when they searched for it interests me beacuse he always as far as i know stuck to the leaving shoes on the beach story. What would be the point if the police had one of the shoes in their posession. Also in his june 9th statement he doesn t really know if he wore white shoes or creme coloured boots. Then on june 14th he has a brain wave (must have hurt) and says he wore kswiss white and blue coloured size 14 and bought in the USA. I d really like to know where the police found the shoe and when.
=====================================================================

They found the shoe the day they had the search warrant to search the vd/Sloot
residence and only searched Joran's quarters.
[/quote]

If they found a shoe, it surely had chocolate on it. Jacobs probably could tell visually, as opposed to employing forensic testing. After he deemed it to be chocolate, he licked it clean.
There must be a chocolate factory on the island. Everything is always covered in chocolate.

Does Willy Wonka live on the island somewhere ???  ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: wreck on March 05, 2008, 11:21:59 PM
Early in the case Tito Lacle a reporter said during his interview with Greta that his sources tell him that authorities are looking for a shoe that Joran lost, possibly in the pond area, and that Joran tried to buy another one to match the shoe he lost. Greta commented that it would have been difficult for Joran to walk home the night of Natalee's disappearance with only one shoe

According to police, he would have hopped home like a bunny in the night, rushing home to take his final exams, but he just couldn't resist a little 'good night' porn with Daury over cookies and warm milk.  ::MonkeyNoNo::
I remember this vividly -- only a complete moron would go to the store and try to buy "ONE" shoe!  ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Ono on March 05, 2008, 11:24:55 PM
Thanks caesu, Jo-An, and JE. Hope I didn't miss anyone. ::MonkeyWink::

Thanks again from me too!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Ono on March 05, 2008, 11:27:08 PM
Thanks caesu, Jo-An, and JE. Hope I didn't miss anyone. ::MonkeyWink::

rob i didn't contribute to the translations i was busy with shoes LOL
all credit goes to Ceasu and Jo-An

LOL! ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Observer on March 05, 2008, 11:30:26 PM
We saw how Mos promised the poor pimps he would release them as suspects by December 31st because it wasn't fair to be a suspect so long which he did. Well what about the victims,is it fair to be a victim for almost 3 years and not be told anything? Whats the big deal,since all the Suspects,Spokespeople and ATA have looked through the files? Are they still protecting the Van Der Sloots privacy like they did searching there property? Is that only there business that they raped and murdered the Holloways Daughter? What about his promise to JQK that he would be able to look at the Dossier? Mos said he has 24 Detectives on the case right now,What the hell are they doing? What have they investigated the last month? What did the 40 Detectives do in Nov/Dec 07?

This Island needs to be boycotted in the worst way since they have no intention on releasing the truth or prosecuting anyone. It's not just Joran Van Der Sloot who needs to be sued for every single cent he could earn in the next 70 years off of Natalee,but Aruba for what they did to this tourist and her Family.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Ono on March 05, 2008, 11:33:36 PM
Going on about the shoes (srry all) Lets assume he lost a shoe during whatever activity. Would he be so stupid as to take the one he has left, including the eventual forensic traces, home and put it in a closet for the police to find??


Very stupid and that doesn't make sense either,his father would have made sure those shoes were nowhere near that house...Everyone knows you can't buy just one shoe! Which leads me to the next question..Why would Freddy feel obligated or volunteer to buy him a new pair of shoes?

Good question. 
The entire shoe thing has been a puzzlement from Day One.  I keep asking myself :  How does Joran benefit from his various shoe stories?  1] They must have some evidence on them.   The rest is a misty cloud of "what ifs" !  I still say a large boned kid like that wears a very large shoe.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: hotping on March 05, 2008, 11:33:51 PM
We saw how Mos promised the poor pimps he would release them as suspects by December 31st because it wasn't fair to be a suspect so long which he did. Well what about the victims,is it fair they have had to wait 34 Months and haven't been told anything? Whats the big deal,since all the Suspects,Spokespeople and ATA have looked through the files? Are they still protecting the Van Der Sloots privacy like they did searching there property? Is that only there business that they raped and murdered the Holloways Daughter? What about his promise to JQK that he would be able to look at the Dossier? Mos said he has 24 Detectives on the case right now,What the hell are they doing? What have they investigated the last month? What did the 40 Detectives do in Nov/Dec 07?

This Island needs to be boycotted in the worst way since they have no intention on releasing the truth or prosecuting anyone. It's not just Joran Van Der Sloot who needs to be sued for every single cent he could earn in the next 70 years off of Natalee,but Aruba for what they did to this tourist and her Family.
All I Can Say is "DITTO"!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Ono on March 05, 2008, 11:38:47 PM
Thanks Jo-An..It is much Appreciated!

Bram sounds like da Man! All we need now is a Hero to step up in that Dutch Govt!  ::MonkeyWink::

Go Bram!! ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: BUCKSHOT on March 05, 2008, 11:38:57 PM
They didn't have enough evidence without the confession tapes, and now even with the confession tapes they don't have enough evidence, Bram says that is simply unbelievable

correction that has to be did

Thanks ciskebab...

you know, the Sloots want Natalee on that beach for a reason and if she is ever found there will be some 'new' reason why Joran is not guilty.

I agree with Bram ~ unbelievable.

I wonder if they thought to link the homeless, chollars, drug runners, or fishermen to the disappearance?

It would be a simple thing to do.  However, some fishermen stepped forward to indicate they did not see J2K or Natalee on the beach.

I wonder just what their PVs, witness statements, or testimony before the judge stated?  What did they see that morning?  Who did they see on the beach?  Perhaps their were others that did not see J2K?

Were the fishermen together as a group (2 or 3)?  Or, did one person step forward and implicate others that morning? 

Is it the statement of a group?  Is it two or three statements of individuals, each with a different perspective? 

Who are the fishermen?  Are they still on the island?  Still alive?

My other question, what did J2K argue about before the judge, as told by Dompig?

I thought it was said they argued when confronted by each other during interrogations.
Meaning, the three of them sat in front of an interrogator who had been told differing stories.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Ono on March 05, 2008, 11:41:03 PM

******* do you know the date when they were looking for it and where they found the bloody/muddy shoe?
In the beginning of the case they were looking for one shoe only. They had another shoe with mud or blood on it,I forget which one it was. However when they did the pond search  in July,Dompig announced to everyone it was a pair of shoes they were looking for,so I did a double take and many others did at RWV as well. We never heard anything from the initial reports until the search at the Pond.

Somewhere deep in the archives you will see the initial reports of looking for one shoe,I am positive of that! They were trying to find the missing shoe is what we were told in the beginning.

This period on Aruba is known as the summer of "The Great Shoe Scare".  All shoes were suspect, none stepped forward.

 ::MonkeyCool::LOL!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: wreck on March 05, 2008, 11:41:29 PM
Going on about the shoes (srry all) Lets assume he lost a shoe during whatever activity. Would he be so stupid as to take the one he has left, including the eventual forensic traces, home and put it in a closet for the police to find??


Very stupid and that doesn't make sense either,his father would have made sure those shoes were nowhere near that house...Everyone knows you can't buy just one shoe! Which leads me to the next question..Why would Freddy feel obligated or volunteer to buy him a new pair of shoes?

Good question. 
The entire shoe thing has been a puzzlement from Day One.  I keep asking myself :  How does Joran benefit from his various shoe stories?  1] They must have some evidence on them.   The rest is a misty cloud of "what ifs" !  I still say a large boned kid like that wears a very large shoe.
...depends on your definition of "big boned" ---- I'm doubting his masculinity.  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: hotping on March 05, 2008, 11:45:25 PM
Going on about the shoes (srry all) Lets assume he lost a shoe during whatever activity. Would he be so stupid as to take the one he has left, including the eventual forensic traces, home and put it in a closet for the police to find??


Very stupid and that doesn't make sense either,his father would have made sure those shoes were nowhere near that house...Everyone knows you can't buy just one shoe! Which leads me to the next question..Why would Freddy feel obligated or volunteer to buy him a new pair of shoes?

Good question. 
The entire shoe thing has been a puzzlement from Day One.  I keep asking myself :  How does Joran benefit from his various shoe stories?  1] They must have some evidence on them.   The rest is a misty cloud of "what ifs" !  I still say a large boned kid like that wears a very large shoe.
...depends on your definition of "big boned" ---- I'm doubting his masculinity.  ::MonkeyWink::
LMAO!  ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: BUCKSHOT on March 05, 2008, 11:47:51 PM
(http://i198.photobucket.com/albums/aa118/Observer00000007/rudy1.jpg)

"The work of the Two Detectives(Castillo and Young) should be looked into seriously"..Dept of Justice Minister Rudy Croes..
(http://i198.photobucket.com/albums/aa118/Observer00000007/thbarf.gif)

roflmfao, rudy has elevated the status of the psycho psychics to detective?  why does that not surprise me at all.  sounds like he inhaled some of his tooth powder this morning before going to work.
dennisintn

Caption: "Make that face again, you look just like a leprechaun. We sure could use you in the Saint Paddy's Day Parade."


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Finbar on March 05, 2008, 11:49:44 PM
Yea, yea.

I read where the headmaster of his school mentioned that he said NH hit her head swimming and drowned.

I think it was World Journier's posts.


CAPS, do you own a cat?


I must feed the credit cards.

Fin

Is that Shango for "I'm going to order Chinese tonight?" ::MonkeyCool::

Peaches,

Kinda, sorta, not really. That is Finbar for I have to go to work to feed the credit cards before Visa sends a hit man looking for me.

But a poo poo platter sounds kinda interesting.

Fin


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: BUCKSHOT on March 05, 2008, 11:52:28 PM
Why was Joran in the driver's seat when the gardener saw them in the car?

(Yes, a dumb question..humor me.)

Just speculating.

Maybe ... upon arriving at Deepak's parked vehicle after leaving an apparently deceased Natalee at the beach ... Joran, Deepak and (?) noticed the lights of the gardener's vehicle approaching and ... scrambled to get inside Deepak's vehicle ... seating was not a priority.

Janet

+++++++++


Jossy Mansur
NANCY GRACE
July 27, 2005


http://edition.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0506/10/ng.01.htm

JOSSY MANSUR, MANAGING EDITOR, "DIARIO": Well, he spoke very clearly of what he saw. He left his home, a standard home, where he lives really. And he was on his way to a room that he has at the house that he works as a gardener because that room has air-conditioning and it was very hot. When he left his home, he had to pass on the dirt road close to that pond that`s being drained now. And there was a car parked smack in the middle of that road, so he had to pass it at a very slow pace, climbing a little mound, and brought him within a yard of view in sight of the other car.

And he claims to have seen Joran behind the wheel, one of the two Kalpoe brothers beside him and the other Kalpoe brother in the back. And when they saw him pass that close, Joran threw up his hands to hide his face, and the other two ducked on the seats.

******* and TM: If gardener's story is true, this makes sense big time. They would have seen him coming, and scrambled into the car - seating would not have been a priority. Or...taking turns as suggested. Or...killing time, waiting for help, in panic mode.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Ono on March 05, 2008, 11:55:27 PM
Early in the case Tito Lacle a reporter said during his interview with Greta that his sources tell him that authorities are looking for a shoe that Joran lost, possibly in the pond area, and that Joran tried to buy another one to match the shoe he lost. Greta commented that it would have been difficult for Joran to walk home the night of Natalee's disappearance with only one shoe

According to police, he would have hopped home like a bunny in the night, rushing home to take his final exams, but he just couldn't resist a little 'good night' porn with Daury over cookies and warm milk.  ::MonkeyNoNo::
I remember this vividly -- only a complete moron would go to the store and try to buy "ONE" shoe!  ::MonkeyLaugh::


 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Observer on March 05, 2008, 11:55:38 PM
Aruba more and more important as transshipment location for drugs

A huge amount of cocaine was intercepted on sea in February of 2007.  One huge catch can influence the statistics, but is not necessarily an indication for a certain tendency.

ORANJESTAD – Aruba functions to an increasing extent as a transshipment location for drugs that find their way via airplane or cruise ship to the United States and to a smaller extent, to Europe, states the International Narcotics Control Strategy Report for 2007 of the International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs of the American State Department that was published last Saturday.   

Aruba was only mentioned as transshipment location in the 2006 report.  According to the Bureau’s available data in the first 10 months of 2007, 390 kilo cocaine and 10 kilo heroine was intercepted.

The 2005 report also mentioned the interception of marihuana and XTC-pills, but these are no longer mentioned in the 2006 and 2007 report.  An increasing use of xtc by the youth is observed in entertainment places.  The production of narcotics in Aruba is not enough to be mentioned in the report.  According to the 2007 report, the Aruban government is pursuing a ‘dynamic anti-drug policy’, in close cooperation with her regional and international partners.   

Aruban justice has arrested and convicted a number of middlemen that delivered drugs to couriers.  The report doesn’t mention details or numbers.  Neither does the report mention the number of American citizens that tried to smuggle kilograms of drugs to the United States.   

The 2006 and 2007 reports vaguely mentioned the expansion of the facilities for the Forward Operating Location (FOL) to use at the airport.  The FOL tries to locate drug transportation from the air with airplanes of the American Air Force and Customs Department.  The 2007 report doesn’t even mention that expansion or that it still exists.

According to American justice, drug smuggling and its related money laundering practices and criminal violence continue to be a threat for Aruba and the Neth.Antilles.
Extending the Judicial cooperation between the American, Dutch, Antillean, and Aruban governments can contribute to lowering that threat on the islands and also to a broader joint fight against the drug criminality in the Caribbean.

http://www.amigoe.com/english/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Ono on March 05, 2008, 11:58:09 PM
Going on about the shoes (srry all) Lets assume he lost a shoe during whatever activity. Would he be so stupid as to take the one he has left, including the eventual forensic traces, home and put it in a closet for the police to find??


Very stupid and that doesn't make sense either,his father would have made sure those shoes were nowhere near that house...Everyone knows you can't buy just one shoe! Which leads me to the next question..Why would Freddy feel obligated or volunteer to buy him a new pair of shoes?

Good question. 
The entire shoe thing has been a puzzlement from Day One.  I keep asking myself :  How does Joran benefit from his various shoe stories?  1] They must have some evidence on them.   The rest is a misty cloud of "what ifs" !  I still say a large boned kid like that wears a very large shoe.
...depends on your definition of "big boned" ---- I'm doubting his masculinity.  ::MonkeyWink::


 ::MonkeyHaHa::     I didn't meant that......


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: BUCKSHOT on March 06, 2008, 12:07:24 AM
Aruba will probably sue Natalee for causing a loss in tourism dollars. ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: BUCKSHOT on March 06, 2008, 12:10:34 AM
Two places on the island were heavily protected:
(1) The VanderSloot residence.
(2) The dump / landfill.
Therefore, these places equal crime scene(s).

Agree ??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Observer on March 06, 2008, 12:11:20 AM
Aruba will probably sue Natalee for causing a loss in tourism dollars. ::MonkeyConfused::

Thats probably what the 24 ATA members...I mean 24 Detectives are working on :(


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Observer on March 06, 2008, 12:16:30 AM
Two places on the island were heavily protected:
(1) The VanderSloot residence.
(2) The dump / landfill.
Therefore, these places equal crime scene(s).

Agree ??
It defintley was not the on the Beach after the Soul Beach Festival..Looking back on it I am suprised the Taxi Cab driver or Buuti didn't claim to see them at the beach.  ::MonkeyConfused::

No doubt in my mind the VDS property was a crime scene and later a White PU that was involved.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 06, 2008, 12:18:03 AM
I have been doing a little scholarly research you could say and came across this very insightful journal article. I don't know if many of you have read this or seen it before but I present it here in its entirety:


Title: A Media Circus in Paradise. By: Wolfson, Hannah, American Journalism Review, 10678654, Aug/Sep2005, Vol. 27, Issue 4
Database: Communication & Mass Media CompleteA Media Circus in Paradise
Contents
The Distressed Treatment
Section: DROP CAP
LETTER FROM ARUBA

An Alabama reporter discovers the press doesn't quite shine in the Caribbean sun

It's the first news conference, and the police superintendent can't find the keys. But no one's told TV. One by one, the camera crews push closer, reporters from CNN and Fox News squeezing onto the narrow sidewalk between a line of parked cars and the locked door of the police annex. Jan van der Straaten, the man in charge of Aruba's investigation into Natalee Holloway's disappearance, is stuck, and soon he's sweating in the Caribbean sun.

A few locals slow down as they drive by to see what's happening while uniformed officers smirk outside the main police station across the street. Finally the door opens and everyone tumbles inside, following van der Straaten up a narrow stairway.

Welcome to the media circus, Aruba style.

OK, I'm just a novice, a print reporter from Alabama covering what started out as a hometown story about a missing teen and mushroomed into nonstop national news. Maybe the crews that converge on events like the Michael Jackson trial and the Runaway Bride are always like this. Maybe it was just the bright tropical light and the strangeness of working in paradise that made things look so absurd. All I know is, after nine days in Aruba, I see what we in the media do--and I say we with great trepidation--in a whole new light.

In fact, looking at it from the Arubans' perspective, I'm a little confused about what we do. Most of the job seems to consist of waiting around in hotel lobbies and seeing who can shout the loudest at news conferences.

There were certainly plenty of us crammed into those daily sessions in the peaked attic room of the police annex. There were a handful of local teams from Birmingham and international crews shipped from Latin America. Then came the bookers and the producers, vying for exclusives with the cloistered mother. Then the shows with dramatic theme music, in crews as large as five. And of course, the Aruban print and radio reporters, who quickly became everyone's favorite sources of speculation.

In the early days, there was plenty to cover. The Royal Dutch Marines searched the beaches while helicopters scanned overhead. Hundreds of locals were herded onto tour buses to help with the hunt. Sources were willing to talk, suspects were arrested, and officials gave tempting hints like, "Hold your breath for 24 hours." The networks sent their satellites and set them up on the roofs of hotels, settling in for the long haul.

Then things started to get weird.

First, CNN ran a report on the island's crack dens and prostitution. Local tourism authorities were outraged. So were a couple of the local reporters, who accused the American press of sabotaging Aruba's economy. By the end of week two, it seemed half of each news conference was dedicated to berating the American press. Even the family's PR agent, who originally represented the tourism authority, was accused of a conflict of interest.

We Americans didn't do ourselves proud, either. Fed up with officials' choice to conduct the first half of each news conference in Papiamento, the local language, some crews took to shouting "English, English!" during the Q-and-A.

Along with Papiamento, Arubans speak English, Spanish and Dutch, but their legal system caused tricky translations. When the first two suspects were arrested (they were later released), the chief prosecutor said they'd been charged with a range of crimes, including murder. A day later, we found ourselves redefining the meaning of "charged" to say first "formally accused" and later "suspected." It turns out they can hold suspects for months without charging them. On July 1, more than a month after Holloway disappeared, the Associated Press had to clarify a story in which the same prosecutor was again quoted as saying three suspects had been charged.

Some of the mistakes were harder to explain. Late one Friday night, CNN reported that at least one of the suspects had confessed. AP quickly followed with a report that he was leading police to the evidence. Moments later, a half dozen news crews sped down a pitch-dark dirt road toward an abandoned beach where police were supposedly digging up a body. Nothing. Officials ranging from the original source right up to the prime minister quickly denied the initial reports.

As guiltily competitive as the rest, I crept out later that night with a Birmingham television crew that was filming distant, spotty footage of men digging in the dunes--probably just local bootleggers pulling up their stash of booze.

Theories abound as to why the media became obsessed with Natalee Holloway's story. It involved a beautiful, blond honor student with influential parents; it occurred in an exotic locale; it started while the jury was out on Jacko. Granted, much of the interest back home stemmed from honest concern about a family's loss. Natalee's mother, Beth Twitty, insisted her daughter represented something perfect and innocent that was lost, a fear that touches the heart of any parent. The outpourings of support in Natalee's hometown and on the island were real, even if they were on camera.

But it also seems the sheer lack of information also spurred the story, because it left plenty of room for speculation, especially as the case progressed. (Aruban officials said releasing details of the investigation could cause a judge to throw out their case.) Natalee had been sold into white slavery, the blogs said. Natalee had run away on a previous trip abroad, Aruban radio countered. Fellow graduates who were on the trip refused to talk: conspiracy! The lead suspect's dad is a judge: conspiracy! My favorite theory came from Aruban reporters who thought police staged the false leak about a confession to discredit American news sources.

Back home in the newsroom, I continued reporting the story by phone as my Aruba tan faded, trying to confirm information as it flashed on TV. Again and again, I heard sources on the other end sigh and say, "No, that's not right." I watched the same television personality who "broke" the news about bloodstains in a suspect's car--which turned out not to be bloodstains--criticize authorities for taking Holloway's family on an emotional rollercoaster. But who's really driving?

The Distressed Treatment
"A damsel must be white. This requirement is nonnegotiable. It helps if her frame is of dimensions that breathless cable television reporters can credibly describe as 'petite.'… She must be attractive--also nonnegotiable. Her economic status should be middle class or higher, but an exception can be made in the case of wartime (see: [Jessica] Lynch).

"Put all this together, and you get 24-7 coverage."

--Washington Post columnist Eugene
Robinson, writing on the media's
and the nation's obsession with
white damsels in distress

PHOTO (COLOR): One tiny piece of the media circus: A U.S. television news crew interviews Beth Twitty (center), mother of missing teen Natalee Holloway, in Oranjestad, Aruba. (In the background on this page is a poster released by the Holloway family.)

~~~~~~~~

By Hannah Wolfson


Wolfson covers the city of Mountain Brook, Alabama, Holloway's hometown, for the Birmingham News.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 06, 2008, 12:18:19 AM
Two places on the island were heavily protected:
(1) The VanderSloot residence.
(2) The dump / landfill.
Therefore, these places equal crime scene(s).

Agree ??

YES!!!

 ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 06, 2008, 12:19:43 AM
Good Night Monkeys.

Janet
9:20 PM


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: finngirl on March 06, 2008, 12:20:46 AM
I have an impression that Astrid Van Rijn is somewhat educated (owns a business, etc.) SandraK strikes me as having crawled out from under a rock, just yesterday. I find it hard to believe that SandraK is really Lorenzo's mother unless she seriously "dumbs down" her Internet posting style.

have noticed every once in awhile, not often,
that sK posts in a more literate manner

used to do the double-take when encountering it

the dumbing-down could account for the difference ...
or perhaps the nic is shared

 :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: suisse71 on March 06, 2008, 12:27:12 AM

Thanks again Jo-An for your update. GOOD TO SEE BRAM TRASHING THE POS PROSECUTOR!!! Can Peter be far behind with an investigation of the whole sordid bunch? I am sure Beth has much to tell them both.

Many thanks!  I so hope Bram can file the civil suit. Get Joran off the streets!!  I'm not a lawyer but I hope he will be able to delve into all of these missing statements, evidence, etc.  Where the hell is Joran's statement from May 31 '05? Was it actually Paulus making 2 ATM w/d  in the wee hours or was it Joran using daddy's card?  My questions are endless, I'll try not to drive you all nuts.  As for the shoes, why can't Joran answer this simple question?
Even in his Greta interview he made such a point about his KSwiss sneakers, "yes Greta these are the same ones.  Well not the exact same ones that are missing, but they look exactly like these ones..." something to that effect.     

Someone else here posted on an earlier thread, may have been Destiny or *******, so sorry I don't recall, about "Thou dost protest too much...."  Anybody help me here?  I thought that line of thinking was really interesting and made sense.  I agree, Joran had sex (raped) Natalee without a condom and he & Paulus had to get rid of the body.  Also, I do believe Beth that Natalee was a virgin and Joran realized that during the rape. So imagine evidence - Paulus being an attorney of course would say "What have you done?!" 

Forgive me for being graphic, but I'd like to peel the skin of his face too...
Joran raped a virgin & possibly K2 raped her as well
Natalee's blood w/ Joran's semem, vomit w/ GHB & Joran's semen, her DNA all over K2 car (Liquid Ecstasy is often cut w/ herion, which makes the person vomit while slipping in and out of consciousness & GHB causes victim to black out)
Natalee has seizures, overdosing, blacked out, or went into a coma. Paulus researching affects of drugs & alcohol. 
Joran DNA, his semem inside of her and on her person.  Even if they find my semen in her = rape w/ no condom
Joran said in the Dutch version of Devries tape, to Beth & Greta, to Jug & friends on that first night, in his June 24th statement [even here he decribes the same sexual acts in details about another girl & also that 12 year old girl] and Joran and Anita describe in detail her underwear and what Joran did sexuallly with Natalee, etc....(Sorry guys this makes me cringe to even write this.) "I fingered her, I wanted her to give me a blow job, I french kissed her, I f**cked her, I'll just f**ck her.... "
Natalee DNA under Joran's fingernails, on him, his clothes, on & in his shoes....
Natalee fought back, I have to believe that, bit him, scratched, hit him and Joran assaulted her to make her stop.  JK2 put too much emphasis on "her hitting her head..."
Natalee in coma or died or murder
All that evidence would get Joran 15 years to say the least. Obviously there was zero proof of consensual sex.   If all or any of the above is not motivation for Paulus & Joran to get rid of the body, "the body of evidence" then what is?
No body, no crime
I believe Beth, Natalee was at VDS home. 
Paulus w/ help of Van der Stratten buried the body and moved the body more than once.  VDS home, then landfill, then??? Pond?  or Ocean? 
Perhaps some evidence was thrown in the pond, just like Joran did with his dead dog. 
And some thrown in the ocean.
Find body, solve crime.
Solve numerous criminal acts.

Again sorry guys!! but I really want to see the POS behind bars forever along with Paulus who the locals refer to as a "womanizer & gambler".  Like father like son.  Joran is a sociopath to say the least.

With the Aruba follow up piece back on tomorrow, I am curious to know what Patrick said about the pond and review again what CAPS said in his summary. Any news from OE about the scan they did of the pond? 


j4n!!!



Hello Suisse and a belated welcome to Monkeyland. I am delighted to see you are well read on those missing statements of Joran's because they are one of the major keys to exposing the corruption.

I'm no expert on Dutch law and we have been told so many lies about it that I doubt I ever will be but from what I understand Bram is a hell of a good lawyer and would know how to demand all the case files.

Getting those files will open up a big old can of whupass on the Aruban officials involved in the corruption. I hope Bram pursues it and I also hopes he gets every dime the Van der Sloots have left. I am surprised they aren't bankrupt by now but assume the Mafia has been paying their legal bills since they have the best Mafia lawyer in the US working for them. Maybe Bram can find that out as discovery in the civil suit.



Thanks so much…  All of you are amazing.  The Freebird 411 on this site sums up my questions and then some.  Essential details and relevant questions.  I hope Bram and Hero Brinkman will study that information, in fact everything on SM. 

It’s unbelievable there is no evidence and they have not been charged with any criminal acts!  Rape & kidnapping – put the burden of proof on them. They have gone to extraordinary lengths to destroy/sanitize the evidence or not provide the most basic forms of evidence. This is beyond corruption and collusion to me. 

I don’t trust Mos – he made sure Joran could not be rearrested. I hope Hero and/or Bram will really look into everything.

Investigation into the investigation.
Investigation into the lack of/total absence of evidence.

“….understand Bram is a hell of a good lawyer and would know how to demand all the case files….” 

I agree with you!  I’m glad Beth & John Q. Kelly have him in their court.  Bram, his father and siblings are all lawyers, fine ones to boot. Agreed, no way does Paulus have the $$$$ to pay Taco and all. 

I care deeply about Natalee and her family.  I am very concerned about the past & next victim/s of Joran.  I will never forget when Patrick said and was visably upset, “He (Joran) has no soul man, he is not human, he is another form of species……”  IMO, Joran has no soul, empathy, remorse, nothing – he is a psychopath/sociopath/rapist etc…. He feels nothing. He has zero integrity. He talks about his victims the same way BTK did, or OJ, Dahmer, etc…

I hope Bram does open a big old can of whupass! I hope Devries has someone tailing Joran and Paulus.  Bring it guys, get the psychos behind bars.

God Bless Beth & Dave and family......

J4N!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Dihannah1 on March 06, 2008, 01:25:43 AM
Please forgive me, as I have been so busy, which will be the case for a little while.  So It would be so gracious if you can provide me with any quick updates I might have missed since yesterday.  It kills me to be away from here, but am dying to know if I've missed anything, especially with the news events and Venzuala vs Columbia.   So anybody willing to give me a snapshot or bullit points of anything new or interesting today?  I would me so much appreciative!  TIA  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Dihannah1 on March 06, 2008, 01:37:11 AM
Ok, well it's late and not many people on now, so I'm heading to the bunky.   I'll try again tomorrow.

G'night and sweet dreams all my monkey friends!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: klaasend on March 06, 2008, 01:42:16 AM
Please forgive me, as I have been so busy, which will be the case for a little while.  So It would be so gracious if you can provide me with any quick updates I might have missed since yesterday.  It kills me to be away from here, but am dying to know if I've missed anything, especially with the news events and Venzuala vs Columbia.   So anybody willing to give me a snapshot or bullit points of anything new or interesting today?  I would me so much appreciative!  TIA  ::MonkeyCool::

Hi Dihannah - nothing really new today except Beth on the Dutch programs.  Looks like that Dutch attorney may be representing her in some civil suits (he hasn't taken the case yet).  I haven't listed to the show but it sounds like everyone, including the audience were very sympathetic to Beth.

Nothing new on the Venezuela thing in relationship to Aruba.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: klaasend on March 06, 2008, 01:51:10 AM
http://www.telegraaf.nl/binnenland/3480899/_Onderzoekt_claim_Van_der_Sloot__.html?p=7,1

(http://www.telesport.nl/multimedia/archive/00157/bram_jpg_157876d.jpg)

Through google translator:

Moszkowicz investigates claim against Van der Sloot

HILVERSUM - Lawyer Bram Moszkowicz investigates whether he Joran van der Sloot through a civil procedure can tackle. In the TV program Pauw and Witteman he said Wednesday evening the odds "85 to 90 percent" believe that he on behalf of Beth Twitty, the mother of missing American teenager Natalee Holloway, a claim goes requirements.

According to Moszkowicz, Van der Sloot's mother harmed by the confessions about the disappearance that he did for the hidden camera of crime reporter Peter R. De Vries, concealment of the Aruban justice. According to the lawyer Natalees mother "psychic gedecompenseerd" and under treatment by a psychiatrist.

That is reason enough for him to recover compensation on the basis of so-called shockschade. Moszkowicz said the process only begin if a big chance of succeeding, because the losses of the case the mother even heavier in mental problems could bring. "This woman can not get much more," he said about Beth Twitty.

The famous lawyer said further curious to find that Van der Sloot still on free feet. "The court commissioner who previously vasthield him without confession, says too little now in the hands with a confession," says Moszkowicz. It is in his view "beyond dispute" that the ontboezemingen of Joran van der Sloot to be regarded as a confession.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Spock on March 06, 2008, 02:07:50 AM
What is that man doing with his mouth? lol


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Finbar on March 06, 2008, 02:14:34 AM
I have been doing a little scholarly research you could say and came across this very insightful journal article. I don't know if many of you have read this or seen it before but I present it here in its entirety:


Title: A Media Circus in Paradise. By: Wolfson, Hannah, American Journalism Review, 10678654, Aug/Sep2005, Vol. 27, Issue 4
Database: Communication & Mass Media CompleteA Media Circus in Paradise
Contents
The Distressed Treatment
Section: DROP CAP
LETTER FROM ARUBA

An Alabama reporter discovers the press doesn't quite shine in the Caribbean sun


Some of the mistakes were harder to explain. Late one Friday night, CNN reported that at least one of the suspects had confessed. AP quickly followed with a report that he was leading police to the evidence. Moments later, a half dozen news crews sped down a pitch-dark dirt road toward an abandoned beach where police were supposedly digging up a body. Nothing. Officials ranging from the original source right up to the prime minister quickly denied the initial reports.

As guiltily competitive as the rest, I crept out later that night with a Birmingham television crew that was filming distant, spotty footage of men digging in the dunes--probably just local bootleggers pulling up their stash of booze.


--Washington Post columnist Eugene
Robinson, writing on the media's
and the nation's obsession with
white damsels in distress

PHOTO (COLOR): One tiny piece of the media circus: A U.S. television news crew interviews Beth Twitty (center), mother of missing teen Natalee Holloway, in Oranjestad, Aruba. (In the background on this page is a poster released by the Holloway family.)

~~~~~~~~

By Hannah Wolfson


Wolfson covers the city of Mountain Brook, Alabama, Holloway's hometown, for the Birmingham News.




WTF?

Maybe someone from there can contact this reporter and see if we can get a clip.

The general area of the dunes would be interesting.

Fin


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on March 06, 2008, 03:56:43 AM

<snip>     

Someone else here posted on an earlier thread, may have been Destiny or *******, so sorry I don't recall, about "Thou dost protest too much...."  Anybody help me here?  I thought that line of thinking was really interesting and made sense.  I agree, Joran had sex (raped) Natalee without a condom and he & Paulus had to get rid of the body.  Also, I do believe Beth that Natalee was a virgin and Joran realized that during the rape. So imagine evidence - Paulus being an attorney of course would say "What have you done?!" 

<snip>

j4n!!!


Hi Suisse

You can blame me for that post.  I continue to be amazed at the number of my brother and sister monkeys who understood what I was trying to say.  I almost deleted it as I have done others that didn't appear to make sense. 

I should have known my fellow monkeys are smarter than the average bear.

~The Average Bear
        ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on March 06, 2008, 04:19:51 AM
FRAMING is not a word, I believe Patrick had in mind for Joran.  Tricking him into a confession of truth as to what happened would be what, in my estimation he was doing.  Whoever used the word FRAMING is either using the wrong word or they are trying to FRAME Patrick.     Jack blue

perhaps more like putting him in the frame...gotta be one those translation problems!

Why is the picture (avatar) showing its azz?   jackblue

She is applying for a job as a refrigerator repairman(person)?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on March 06, 2008, 04:24:42 AM
Jo-An

Thank you for translating the show for us.  I hope you have gotten enough rest for another day in the cage.

                                                               ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Jo-An on March 06, 2008, 05:03:45 AM
Jo-An

Thank you for translating the show for us.  I hope you have gotten enough rest for another day in the cage.

                                                               ::MonkeyWink::

Just 5 hrs of sleep so I'm feeling a bit  ::MonkeyConfused::!!!!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Peaches on March 06, 2008, 05:10:35 AM
Maybe there was only one Swiss K in the Lost and Found at the Racquet Club was why Joran only had one shoe Size 14.

How hard is it to measure a kid's foot?

But I suppose first one would have to want to know and besides, it's easier to blame the American media for failure to perform at even the most minimal of universally accepted standards.

Things like that require bending over and stretching which interferes with the Frosted Flakes agenda.

moo

Good morning.  I'm going to go out on a limb here and suggest Mr. Frosted Flakes has not been able to see him own feet for a long time.  IMO.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Jo-An on March 06, 2008, 05:13:27 AM
Anyone need one of these?  ::MonkeyHaHa::
I mean... after nearly 3 years of this mess...

(http://img179.imageshack.us/img179/2219/fukitolpb7.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Peaches on March 06, 2008, 05:40:50 AM
We saw how Mos promised the poor pimps he would release them as suspects by December 31st because it wasn't fair to be a suspect so long which he did. Well what about the victims,is it fair to be a victim for almost 3 years and not be told anything? Whats the big deal,since all the Suspects,Spokespeople and ATA have looked through the files? Are they still protecting the Van Der Sloots privacy like they did searching there property? Is that only there business that they raped and murdered the Holloways Daughter? What about his promise to JQK that he would be able to look at the Dossier? Mos said he has 24 Detectives on the case right now,What the hell are they doing? What have they investigated the last month? What did the 40 Detectives do in Nov/Dec 07?

This Island needs to be boycotted in the worst way since they have no intention on releasing the truth or prosecuting anyone. It's not just Joran Van Der Sloot who needs to be sued for every single cent he could earn in the next 70 years off of Natalee,but Aruba for what they did to this tourist and her Family.

I agree.  Where's a good volcano when you need it? 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: GBMW on March 06, 2008, 05:42:09 AM
Peter R. de Vries is working on some new, very promising, leads but doesn't know yet if there will a show about it.

I get this from an interview that the company I work for did with him...it hasn't been aired yet (and of course I don't if or when that will happen).

I did get an ok to do some more research for the corruptionlink with this case! Many thanks to Jo-An who gave me the link with the summary; it helped a lot!

I must emphasise this still doesn't mean an awful lot; checking 'a story' a bit more happens but at least the request / idea wasn't a no ;-)

There is so much corruption around this case so I think I need to focus on the most important ones. Because otherwise it could be overwhelming. So some feedback would be very much appreciated.....



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: mojo on March 06, 2008, 05:54:09 AM
FRAMING is not a word, I believe Patrick had in mind for Joran.  Tricking him into a confession of truth as to what happened would be what, in my estimation he was doing.  Whoever used the word FRAMING is either using the wrong word or they are trying to FRAME Patrick.     Jack blue

perhaps more like putting him in the frame...gotta be one those translation problems!

Why is the picture (avatar) showing its azz?   jackblue

She is applying for a job as a refrigerator repairman(person)?

it's a man ray photo, and i liked it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Buckeye on March 06, 2008, 06:03:18 AM
Peter R. de Vries is working on some new, very promising, leads but doesn't know yet if there will a show about it.

I get this from an interview that the company I work for did with him...it hasn't been aired yet (and of course I don't if or when that will happen).

I did get an ok to do some more research for the corruptionlink with this case! Many thanks to Jo-An who gave me the link with the summary; it helped a lot!

I must emphasise this still doesn't mean an awful lot; checking 'a story' a bit more happens but at least the request / idea wasn't a no ;-)

There is so much corruption around this case so I think I need to focus on the most important ones. Because otherwise it could be overwhelming. So some feedback would be very much appreciated.....



I am not quite sure what you are looking for.

I have always been fascinated at a couple times that Aruba has moved fast. 

Once, when MSNBC had been invited into KIA and ended up filming Joran........instant injunction.  Did parliament get called, in the night?  The prison board??  Madura apologizing to Paulus??  Who had the power to stop this that fast?

Slanderous statements by the psychics and Renee Gielen, backed by the Ministers, paid travel by the government (Ministers?).  Han Mos, on returning from vacation, issues a statement removing suspect status from Julia Renfro (no one else and several people are slandered).  Did he think that up himself?  Who issued that order?

Who decides what everybody does?  Rudy? (and the Ministers?)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Jo-An on March 06, 2008, 06:14:54 AM
Peter R. de Vries is working on some new, very promising, leads but doesn't know yet if there will a show about it.

I get this from an interview that the company I work for did with him...it hasn't been aired yet (and of course I don't if or when that will happen).

I did get an ok to do some more research for the corruptionlink with this case! Many thanks to Jo-An who gave me the link with the summary; it helped a lot!

I must emphasise this still doesn't mean an awful lot; checking 'a story' a bit more happens but at least the request / idea wasn't a no ;-)

There is so much corruption around this case so I think I need to focus on the most important ones. Because otherwise it could be overwhelming. So some feedback would be very much appreciated.....


First things that come to mind:
-why was v.d. Sloot property not searched entirely?
-why did v.d. Straten say that he knew that Natalee wouldn't be found alive because he "knew the investigation"?
-where are the missing statements from May 31st?
-where are the missing pages from Paul's statement?
-why was the press informed that Natalee's body had been found, but days later that announcement was withdrawn and a couple of days later one of the suspects said "something bad happened" to Natalee?



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: ldstlou on March 06, 2008, 06:41:31 AM
Anyone need one of these?  ::MonkeyHaHa::
I mean... after nearly 3 years of this mess...

(http://img179.imageshack.us/img179/2219/fukitolpb7.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)


I think we could market these!! lol


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Hotshot on March 06, 2008, 06:46:16 AM
Peter R. de Vries is working on some new, very promising, leads but doesn't know yet if there will a show about it.

I get this from an interview that the company I work for did with him...it hasn't been aired yet (and of course I don't if or when that will happen).

I did get an ok to do some more research for the corruptionlink with this case! Many thanks to Jo-An who gave me the link with the summary; it helped a lot!

I must emphasise this still doesn't mean an awful lot; checking 'a story' a bit more happens but at least the request / idea wasn't a no ;-)

There is so much corruption around this case so I think I need to focus on the most important ones. Because otherwise it could be overwhelming. So some feedback would be very much appreciated.....


First things that come to mind:
-why was v.d. Sloot property not searched entirely?
-why did v.d. Straten say that he knew that Natalee wouldn't be found alive because he "knew the investigation"? His words were "I know, because you haven't see what I have seen"
-where are the missing statements from May 31st?
-where are the missing pages from Paul's statement?
-why was the press informed that Natalee's body had been found, but days later that announcement was withdrawn and a couple of days later one of the suspects said "something bad happened" to Natalee?




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: mojo on March 06, 2008, 06:49:03 AM
GBMW -- van der Stratten and Jacobs have to be top of the list...those first few days.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Silverfox on March 06, 2008, 06:53:53 AM
Aruba more and more important as transshipment location for drugs

A huge amount of cocaine was intercepted on sea in February of 2007.  One huge catch can influence the statistics, but is not necessarily an indication for a certain tendency.

ORANJESTAD – Aruba functions to an increasing extent as a transshipment location for drugs that find their way via airplane or cruise ship to the United States and to a smaller extent, to Europe, states the International Narcotics Control Strategy Report for 2007 of the International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs of the American State Department that was published last Saturday.   

Aruba was only mentioned as transshipment location in the 2006 report.  According to the Bureau’s available data in the first 10 months of 2007, 390 kilo cocaine and 10 kilo heroine was intercepted.

The 2005 report also mentioned the interception of marihuana and XTC-pills, but these are no longer mentioned in the 2006 and 2007 report.  An increasing use of xtc by the youth is observed in entertainment places.  The production of narcotics in Aruba is not enough to be mentioned in the report.  According to the 2007 report, the Aruban government is pursuing a ‘dynamic anti-drug policy’, in close cooperation with her regional and international partners.   

Aruban justice has arrested and convicted a number of middlemen that delivered drugs to couriers.  The report doesn’t mention details or numbers.  Neither does the report mention the number of American citizens that tried to smuggle kilograms of drugs to the United States.   

The 2006 and 2007 reports vaguely mentioned the expansion of the facilities for the Forward Operating Location (FOL) to use at the airport.  The FOL tries to locate drug transportation from the air with airplanes of the American Air Force and Customs Department.  The 2007 report doesn’t even mention that expansion or that it still exists.

According to American justice, drug smuggling and its related money laundering practices and criminal violence continue to be a threat for Aruba and the Neth.Antilles.
Extending the Judicial cooperation between the American, Dutch, Antillean, and Aruban governments can contribute to lowering that threat on the islands and also to a broader joint fight against the drug criminality in the Caribbean.

http://www.amigoe.com/english/

Notice that this report mentions nothing about the "UNDERWATER" storage and retrieval system that might be in place... The bulk of drug shipments is always heavier by water as opposed by air. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Silverfox on March 06, 2008, 07:09:01 AM
Now here is an interesting Swiss article on hiding drugs in the sea and the connection to Chavez and the Drug Cartels with trafficking to Africa, North America and Europe -- just one more perspective as to the importance of Aruba to Chavez and the drug lords...

Does anyone out there really believe that certain Aruban officials are above the infectious corruption of the illicit drug trade? 

http://www.swissinfo.org/eng/international/ticker/detail/Venezuela_a_hot_spot_in_global_drugs_trade.html?siteSect=143&sid=8038341&cKey=1184857762000 (http://www.swissinfo.org/eng/international/ticker/detail/Venezuela_a_hot_spot_in_global_drugs_trade.html?siteSect=143&sid=8038341&cKey=1184857762000)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Silverfox on March 06, 2008, 07:13:48 AM
Of particular interest in the above url link I posted is a portion of the article that refers to "cowboys" -- American DEA agents -- take note Shango riddlers:

Quote
'COWBOYS'

While European experts agree smuggling volumes have jumped, some question the higher estimates of U.S. officials and say Venezuela cooperates with European navies in the Caribbean.

Some also say the DEA had ruffled feathers by conducting operations without informing Venezuelan authorities.

"The Americans were cowboys," said one European security source.

He said the operations included allowing consignments of drugs to leave the country in order to trap dealers at the port of delivery. This infuriated the Venezuelans and led to charges that the DEA was smuggling on its own account.

"Huge quantities of drugs would leave our country so that it could be monitored as it was handed over, but then we never got any more information on it," Carreno said.

British and Dutch navy vessels pay a key role in patrolling the Caribbean, particularly in intercepting Venezuelan fishing boats racing from coves along the coast to the Netherlands Antilles, a rich source of drug couriers with EU passports.

Although Chavez's government is clearly more interested in working with European governments than the United States, one security source said trafficking groups are very efficient at moving cocaine through the Caribbean.

"There is co-operation but these fishing boats have three outboard motors," he said. "They travel by night and they are quick."



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Jo-An on March 06, 2008, 07:19:58 AM

-why did v.d. Straten say that he knew that Natalee wouldn't be found alive because he "knew the investigation"? His words were "I know, because you haven't see what I have seen"


This is the original interview:

’Ik geloof niet meer dat ze nog leeft’
Door Dick Hofland/GPD

ORANJESTAD - Commissaris Jan van der Straten leidt op Aruba het onderzoek naar de verdwijning van de Amerikaanse puber Natalee Holloway. Hoop op een goede afloop voor het verdwenen meisje heeft hij niet meer. Aandachtig luistert hij naar iemand die hem telefonisch tipt over de verdwijning van de Amerikaanse puber Natalee Holloway. ,,O, jaja. Nou, aan helderzienden heb ik niks.''

Hij schudt het hoofd. ,,Ik heb alleen iets aan feiten.’’ Op zijn kantoor in de wijk Noord op Aruba hangt een tijdslijn, waar het verloop van de onderzoek te volgen is; wie was waar op welk moment, wie heeft wie waar, wanneer gezien. Dertien jaar werkt hij nu op Aruba en volgende maand gaat hij met pensioen. Af en toe was er een moord, meestal in de familiesfeer, soms had die te maken met drugs. Verder gebeurt er niet zo veel. ,,Arubanen zijn vriendelijke mensen, die geweld schuwen.’’ De laatste vijf jaar is hij belast met de reorganisatie van de politie op het tropische eiland.

- Een makkie?
,,Ha. Zo zou ik het niet willen noemen. Als je hier bent als Nederlander moet je niet zeggen: zó moet het. Je moet de mensen er altijd bij betrekken."

- Het is een hechte gemeenschap, ook het justitiewereldje. Is dat niet link?
,,Het is een klein eiland, iedereen kent iedereen. Rechters, advocaten, op recepties kom ik ze allemaal tegen.’’

- Dus ook Paul van der S., die een tijdje heeft vastgezeten op verdenking van betrokkenheid bij de verdwijning?
,,Ja, ik ken hem goed. Maar zoals ze hier zeggen: lei pa un, lei pa tur. De wet voor één is de wet voor allen. Als er redenen zijn om iemand te arresteren, dan doe je dat.’’

- Wat doet de verdwijning van Natalee Holloway u?
,,Ik vind het afschuwelijk voor de ouders, het is niet niks als je je kind kwijtraakt. Maar ik blijf zakelijk: dit is een onderzoek.’’

- Men begint ongeduldig te worden.
,,Een goed onderzoek vraagt tijd. Bij haast is niemand gebaat. Als je gaat forceren, is de kans op fouten te groot."

- Hebt u nog hoop op een goede afloop?

,,Hoop moet je altijd hebben, maar ik geloof niet dat we Natalee levend zullen terugvinden.’’

- Waarom niet?
,,Omdat ik het onderzoek ken.’’

Omdat ik het onderzoek ken = Because I know the investigation

Or do you maybe mean different interview??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Silverfox on March 06, 2008, 07:30:30 AM
Even more on the subject on underwater storage and trafficking of drugs by FARC:

Quote
The recent discovery in the Pacific Coast estuary about 25 miles south of the port city of Buenaventura reflects drug traffickers' growing use of such boats in the face of stepped-up operations by Colombian and U.S.  anti-drug forces, experts here say.

The subs were probably commissioned by the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, or FARC, in whose zone of influence the shipyard was situated, according to the officer, who asked not to be identified for security reasons.  The FARC is thought to be Colombia's most powerful drug-trafficking organization. 

http://www.mapinc.org/tlcnews/v07/n1283/a06.htm (http://www.mapinc.org/tlcnews/v07/n1283/a06.htm)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Silverfox on March 06, 2008, 07:49:18 AM
And even more interesting reading:

Quote
The soldiers and contract employees that the U.S. military deploys to bases in Latin America and the Caribbean far outnumber the staffs of U.S. civilian agencies in the region. The presence of more than 10,000 U.S. personnel on military missions abroad sends a message that the United States prefers force over diplomacy to settle the region’s problems, including problems that involve conflict with the United States. In addition to their role in facilitating military operations, U.S. bases are a symbol of Washington’s history of armed intervention and of its use of local armies to control the region’s people and resources. Several U.S. bases in the Caribbean were explicitly acquired, not by mutual agreement but through conquests in the 1898 Spanish-American-Cuban War.

Besides evoking the past, the bases are contracted into a future beyond any articulated military mission. Plan Colombia was originally envisioned as a two-year push into guerrilla-occupied southern territories, with vague plans for subsequent years. In contrast, the Pentagon has ten-year leases in Ecuador, Curacao, and Aruba and a presence in perpetuity at its naval base in Guantánamo.

http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/msg114662.html (http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/msg114662.html)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Silverfox on March 06, 2008, 07:58:35 AM
point and counterpoint:

Contention: The reason the Natalee Holloway case has been covered up and smeared by the toxins of corruption is directly linked to National Security issues of the United States visa vi the War on Drugs and the instable government of Venezuela with strong links to FARC and the Drug Cartels.

The "cowboys" of the DEA are somehow connected to the controversy.  Whether you like it or not Natalee will never see justice as long as this issue best serves the National Security of the United States.

Natalee was simply in the wrong place and the wrong time and this is why Paulus, in his sick and perverted mind, is so secure in his premise of "no body, no crime."

Paulus might even be a hero in the eyes of the "cowboys" if he has been supplying information or support in the "war against drugs"...

fact or fiction... you decide...

I'm not casting judgments here -- only observations and a study of the facts of the case.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on March 06, 2008, 08:03:29 AM
Maybe there was only one Swiss K in the Lost and Found at the Racquet Club was why Joran only had one shoe Size 14.

How hard is it to measure a kid's foot?

But I suppose first one would have to want to know and besides, it's easier to blame the American media for failure to perform at even the most minimal of universally accepted standards.

Things like that require bending over and stretching which interferes with the Frosted Flakes agenda.

moo

Good morning.  I'm going to go out on a limb here and suggest Mr. Frosted Flakes has not been able to see him own feet for a long time.  IMO.


He has DickyDoo Syndrome. That is when your belly sticks out further than your dicky do.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Silverfox on March 06, 2008, 08:06:47 AM
oh and PS...

I am so disappointed... ::MonkeyNoNo::

(http://i195.photobucket.com/albums/z215/kickradio/harryking.jpg)

I went out and bought NEW SUSPENDERS...

and nobody...but not notbody even noticed:

(http://i195.photobucket.com/albums/z215/kickradio/harryking2.gif)

Just goes to show everybody loves my loveable face and forgets about the rest of me...LOL  ::MonkeyTongue:: ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on March 06, 2008, 08:19:23 AM
LOL Silver ....I did notice!! LMAO!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Blonde on March 06, 2008, 08:21:34 AM
(Translation)
The mother of Lorenzo, Astrid van Rijn, operates as a poster on a number of websites (as SandraK and Keywest). She said recently that she is on good footing with Robin Holloway, the wife of Dave Holloway. Of course, this is spicy, now that the former girlfriend of Lorenzo van Rijn withdrew his alibi on May 30, 2005

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2669.100


I posted this somewhere yesterday, SandraK the nic anyway was posting with a group at (soda pop site)?

Robin was posting there and SandraK became changed, very  very nice


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: wreck on March 06, 2008, 08:40:04 AM
Maybe there was only one Swiss K in the Lost and Found at the Racquet Club was why Joran only had one shoe Size 14.

How hard is it to measure a kid's foot?

But I suppose first one would have to want to know and besides, it's easier to blame the American media for failure to perform at even the most minimal of universally accepted standards.

Things like that require bending over and stretching which interferes with the Frosted Flakes agenda.

moo

Good morning.  I'm going to go out on a limb here and suggest Mr. Frosted Flakes has not been able to see him own feet for a long time.  IMO.


He has DickyDoo Syndrome. That is when your belly sticks out further than your dicky do.

Very similar to "Dunlops" syndrome............................................



......... when "his belly done lopped over his belt"


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on March 06, 2008, 09:09:29 AM
FRAMING is not a word, I believe Patrick had in mind for Joran.  Tricking him into a confession of truth as to what happened would be what, in my estimation he was doing.  Whoever used the word FRAMING is either using the wrong word or they are trying to FRAME Patrick.     Jack blue

perhaps more like putting him in the frame...gotta be one those translation problems!

Why is the picture (avatar) showing its azz?   jackblue

She is applying for a job as a refrigerator repairman(person)?

it's a man ray photo, and i liked it.

Now for the next question (or at least my next question):

"I do not photograph nature. I photograph my visions."

Man Ray, the master of experimental and fashion photography was also a painter, a filmmaker, a poet, an essayist, a philosopher, and a leader of American modernism. Known for documenting the cultural elite living in France, Man Ray spent much of his time fighting the formal constraints of the visual arts. Ray’s life and art were always provocative, engaging, and challenging.

<snip>

He died on November 18, 1976 at the age of eighty-six. One the great artists and agitators of his time, Man Ray will be remembered not simply for the fascinating and experimental works he left behind, but for the crucial role he played in encouraging the revolutionary in art.

Man Ray: Prophet of the Avant-Garde 
 
http://www.pbs.org/wnet/americanmasters/database/ray_m.html

I love being a monkey, I learn something new every day!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: caesu on March 06, 2008, 09:16:22 AM
here is Hero Brinkman talking about corruption (mp3, in dutch):

http://download.omroep.nl/rnw/smac/cms/car_gevangenisst_maarten_20080305_44_1kHz.mp3

it is in dutch, but he says he has many sources from inside the antilles and outside.

also he has received hunderds of e-mails about corrupt politicians and state officials.

this news article in less detail than the mp3 is about the same subject:
http://antilliaans.caribiana.nl/bovenwinden/Car20080305_Gevangenis-NOVA

i translated it yesterday, it is mainly about corruption on st. maarten - this was brought up by NOVA current affairs program.

this article is about the new technical assistent taking over.
the previous assistent was sent home after he revealed a corruption scandal. the article however doesn't mention this.
(stealing a large sum of money from the prison with possible involvement of the prison director himself!)
http://news.caribseek.com/Sint_Maarten/The_Daily_Herald/article_62500.shtml
st. maarten is particulary bad as last month the police chief was transferred and arrested.
http://www.thedailyherald.com/news/daily/k239/holiday239.html
there is much to read about that. just unbelievable...
not directly related to aruba, but it shows to me the climate of corruption on the antilles/aruba.



as said before friday/saturday the remaining parts on NOVA about corruption.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on March 06, 2008, 09:24:34 AM
oh and PS...

I am so disappointed... ::MonkeyNoNo::

(http://i195.photobucket.com/albums/z215/kickradio/harryking.jpg)

I went out and bought NEW SUSPENDERS...

and nobody...but not notbody even noticed:

(http://i195.photobucket.com/albums/z215/kickradio/harryking2.gif)

Just goes to show everybody loves my loveable face and forgets about the rest of me...LOL  ::MonkeyTongue:: ::MonkeyHaHa::

I noticed, I even noticed you have hands now.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: caesu on March 06, 2008, 09:26:24 AM
here is Hero Brinkman talking about corruption (mp3, in dutch):

http://download.omroep.nl/rnw/smac/cms/car_gevangenisst_maarten_20080305_44_1kHz.mp3

it is in dutch, but he says he has many sources from inside the antilles and outside.

also he has received hunderds of e-mails about corrupt politicians and state officials.

this news article in less detail than the mp3 is about the same subject:
http://antilliaans.caribiana.nl/bovenwinden/Car20080305_Gevangenis-NOVA

i translated it yesterday, it is mainly about corruption on st. maarten - this was brought up by NOVA current affairs program.

this article is about the new technical assistent taking over.
the previous assistent was sent home after he revealed a corruption scandal. the article however doesn't mention this.
(stealing a large sum of money from the prison with possible involvement of the prison director himself!)
http://news.caribseek.com/Sint_Maarten/The_Daily_Herald/article_62500.shtml
st. maarten is particulary bad as last month the police chief was transferred and arrested.
http://www.thedailyherald.com/news/daily/k239/holiday239.html
there is much to read about that. just unbelievable...
not directly related to aruba, but it shows to me the climate of corruption on the antilles/aruba.



as said before friday/saturday the remaining parts on NOVA about corruption.


just to add to this. this brought the justice minister of the Antilles David Dick in a very awkward position.

to explain there are 3 countries: aruba, antilles, netherlands.
all have a justice minister.
Quote

Holiday’s lawyer calls for
probe into Dick’s motives


PHILIPSBURG--Justice Minister David Dick appointed Police Chief Commissioner Derrick Holiday as advisor to the Ministry of Justice while he knew Holiday was considered a suspect in an ongoing investigation.

Holiday’s lawyer Joeri Essed queried the Minister’s actions in a press statement on Monday.

Essed also raised questions about the minister’s decision to place Holiday on non-active duty as an advisor and not as Police Chief Commissioner.

“I cannot help but wonder whether there are ulterior motives at play in this entire course of events,” Essed said. He believes Dick’s actions should be thoroughly reviewed.

http://www.thedailyherald.com/news/daily/k239/holiday239.html

i think there is a good chance one remaining NOVA part is about this scandal.

as said before not related to aruba.
but overall attention to corruption on antilles/aruba is a good thing - it can set other things in motion.
and it backs up Hero Brinkman's allegation of the 'corrupt gangter's nest'. there is no denying anymore.

"Hero Brinkman was right after all"


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on March 06, 2008, 09:28:04 AM
Caesu

Thanks for translating the show last night.

                         ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: wreck on March 06, 2008, 09:28:44 AM
oh and PS...

I am so disappointed... ::MonkeyNoNo::

(http://i195.photobucket.com/albums/z215/kickradio/harryking.jpg)

I went out and bought NEW SUSPENDERS...

and nobody...but not notbody even noticed:

(http://i195.photobucket.com/albums/z215/kickradio/harryking2.gif)

Just goes to show everybody loves my loveable face and forgets about the rest of me...LOL  ::MonkeyTongue:: ::MonkeyHaHa::
I noticed!!! I always was reminded of Larry King. I think people forget just how big Larry was in radio before his CNN show. I had assumed LK was inspirational for "kickradio"!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: caesu on March 06, 2008, 09:33:29 AM
interesting reading to get the whole police chief replacement problem understood.
david dick is of course also justice minister for bonaire.

if the justice minister of the antilles is going down this is a huge scandal.


Mercelina said there was a situation in Bonaire similar to that in St. Maarten. The Netherlands will not extend the contract of Police Chief Commissioner Johan van der Straten and NAPB believes that again a Dutch replacement will be appointed.


http://www.thedailyherald.com/news/daily/k222/blow222.html

jan = short for johan


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on March 06, 2008, 09:33:36 AM
(Translation)
The mother of Lorenzo, Astrid van Rijn, operates as a poster on a number of websites (as SandraK and Keywest). She said recently that she is on good footing with Robin Holloway, the wife of Dave Holloway. Of course, this is spicy, now that the former girlfriend of Lorenzo van Rijn withdrew his alibi on May 30, 2005

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2669.100


I posted this somewhere yesterday, SandraK the nic anyway was posting with a group at (soda pop site)?

Robin was posting there and SandraK became changed, very  very nice


I do not think SandraK is Lorenzo's mum. Unless Lorenzo's Mum lives in Michigan.
Klaas??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: caesu on March 06, 2008, 09:38:34 AM
Caesu

Thanks for translating the show last night.

                         ::MonkeyCool::

i could do a full transcript translation because it was very interesting but difficult to with al the 'law terms'.

but the Telegraaf article already posted here gives a very good summary.

i hope bram mosko will go on one of the american networks like greta for example.
or JQK will go into details about what Bram Mosko is trying to do.

Bram Mosko is next week on Jensen.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: caesu on March 06, 2008, 09:47:17 AM
yesterday's Pauw/Witteman:

http://player.omroep.nl/?aflID=6626789 (Bram Mosko starts about 2 thirds on the show)

yesterday's Jensen:

click here (http://www.rtl.nl/(vm=/shows/jensen/home/)/system/video/html//components/shows/jensen/miMedia/2008/week10/wo_gasten_de_zaak_holloway.avi_plain.xml) (mostly in Dutch)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Rob on March 06, 2008, 09:58:18 AM
Hi and Good Morning all..

Hey, I'm thinking about this possible civil suit by Beth and Bram. I'm not sure what that would accomplish in terms of a monetary reward. The Sloots will certainly claim some sort of insolvency. I guess it could be a moral victory, but without the money to compensate for Beth's loss, I really don't think it would be totally worth it. The expense of such a suit would be pretty high. Beth would need to reside in Holland during the suit and that alone would be expensive. Then add in the costs of Bram. So, it's not worth it unless the Sloots can be squeezed.

But, it would also make them suffer which I'm all for. It would also possibly enter their banking records and I would love to see those. Especially any ATM transactions around 5-30-2005.

Another interesting fact would be revealed . . . and that would be who the heck is really paying for all these attorneys.
I am quite sure that a school teacher and a corrupt civil servant do not have the funds to pay these high priced attorneys and Taco is one of the highest paid around. So, I would look forward to that.

And the fact that Paulus is hiring attorneys for the Kalpoes would be revealed.

It would be interesting to see how the Sloots pay for all these expenses yet seem to have no real wealth.

I also realize that Jossy has said Paulus seems to have the money to pay these expenses and I am also aware that the Sloot family may have been compensated for the land that was used in the highway project in Holland. But, I just do not see the Sloots as wealthy. They drive old cars and their house looks to be only around 100K.

They just don't seem wealthy to me.

If they suffer, I'm happy. Funny how that works. LOL


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 06, 2008, 10:04:51 AM
Peter R. de Vries is working on some new, very promising, leads but doesn't know yet if there will a show about it.

I get this from an interview that the company I work for did with him...it hasn't been aired yet (and of course I don't if or when that will happen).

I did get an ok to do some more research for the corruptionlink with this case! Many thanks to Jo-An who gave me the link with the summary; it helped a lot!

I must emphasise this still doesn't mean an awful lot; checking 'a story' a bit more happens but at least the request / idea wasn't a no ;-)

There is so much corruption around this case so I think I need to focus on the most important ones. Because otherwise it could be overwhelming. So some feedback would be very much appreciated.....



Wow, that is great news!

I would focus on Van der Stratten and Jacobs.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Maggie on March 06, 2008, 10:06:21 AM

IMO, some (no, more than expected) of the wealthy hide their wealth. If you look at the Venture Capital people in California, a lot of them live in higher than modest homes, but not really extravagant, and drive $25,000 cars. I think as they accrue more money, it becomes a game to make more without the desire to spend.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Maggie on March 06, 2008, 10:08:42 AM

Klauss,
Can you fix my avi so it doesn't have the extra buttons? TIA


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: caesu on March 06, 2008, 10:16:41 AM
Quote
Sarah understands Aruba’s
position on Justice matters


PHILIPSBURG--Constitutional Affairs Commissioner Sarah Wescot-Williams understands Aruba’s not wanting to let go of acquired constitutional rights such as having its own Attorney General.

While the Dutch Government has negotiated one Attorney General for Curaçao, St. Maarten and the BES islands Bonaire, St. Eustatius and Saba in the constitutional change process, Dutch Justice Minister Ernst Hirsch Ballin announced on Monday that Aruba would have its own Attorney General and that the Dutch Justice Minister’s authority to give instructions to the Attorney General would not apply to that island.

“Aruba in its discussions with the Minister always stated that the process of the Netherlands Antilles should not change what it has today; that is, its own Attorney General. While Aruba is a necessary partner in the process, it is going to make sure that changes it does not want will not happen,” Wescot-Williams stated during Wednesday’s Executive Council press briefing.

Regarding the position of St. Maarten towards Aruba not having its own Attorney General, the Commissioner said St Maarten was party to several agreements in the context of November 2, 2006.

“In there it’s clear how we think and look at the Attorney General and how we look at the authority of instruction by the Dutch Minister. Let’s realise these particular issues have been issues of much discussion ever since the signing of the November 2006 accord.”

She said everyone was looking at the advice of the Council of State on the matter of instruction by the Dutch Justice Minister in his capacity as member of the Kingdom Council of Ministers.

“The crucial part is article 43 of the Charter of the Kingdom. That is a guarantee function of the Kingdom. Only when there is a total breakdown in the areas of Justice, good governance or financial government can a member of the Kingdom Council of Ministers intervene.”

http://www.thedailyherald.com/news/daily/k235/justice235.html

Attorney General = Procureur Generaal

this must be an article from 2 weeks ago.

i linked these things up and now i find an article doing the same thing.  ::MonkeyHaHa::

this english blog is very interesting about the antilles/st. maarten corruption:

http://sxmprivateeye.com/

(main language on st. maarten is english)

http://sxmprivateeye.com/node/12227
Quote
Nova, Nazi's and the Today Rag

The Today Editorial today is a remarkable piece of work of sophistry for a newspaper which would have trouble investigating itself out of a paper bag. It is a rambling mess of irrational outrage at the news a NOVA TV crew is planning to come here and do some investigative reporting on the island about corruption. According to the Today, the perception that St. Maarten is corrupt is 'erroneous', 'ludicrous' and 'malicious'. It attacks any locals who are planning to talk to NOVA about corruption as being on par with Nazi sympathizers of the second world war in Holland who cooperated with the occupation.

O M G

i wonder what happens if the NOVA crew went to aruba as well to look into corruption there.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 06, 2008, 10:19:54 AM
I have been doing a little scholarly research you could say and came across this very insightful journal article. I don't know if many of you have read this or seen it before but I present it here in its entirety:


Title: A Media Circus in Paradise. By: Wolfson, Hannah, American Journalism Review, 10678654, Aug/Sep2005, Vol. 27, Issue 4
Database: Communication & Mass Media CompleteA Media Circus in Paradise
Contents
The Distressed Treatment
Section: DROP CAP
LETTER FROM ARUBA

An Alabama reporter discovers the press doesn't quite shine in the Caribbean sun

It's the first news conference, and the police superintendent can't find the keys. But no one's told TV. One by one, the camera crews push closer, reporters from CNN and Fox News squeezing onto the narrow sidewalk between a line of parked cars and the locked door of the police annex. Jan van der Straaten, the man in charge of Aruba's investigation into Natalee Holloway's disappearance, is stuck, and soon he's sweating in the Caribbean sun.

A few locals slow down as they drive by to see what's happening while uniformed officers smirk outside the main police station across the street. Finally the door opens and everyone tumbles inside, following van der Straaten up a narrow stairway.

Welcome to the media circus, Aruba style.

OK, I'm just a novice, a print reporter from Alabama covering what started out as a hometown story about a missing teen and mushroomed into nonstop national news. Maybe the crews that converge on events like the Michael Jackson trial and the Runaway Bride are always like this. Maybe it was just the bright tropical light and the strangeness of working in paradise that made things look so absurd. All I know is, after nine days in Aruba, I see what we in the media do--and I say we with great trepidation--in a whole new light.

In fact, looking at it from the Arubans' perspective, I'm a little confused about what we do. Most of the job seems to consist of waiting around in hotel lobbies and seeing who can shout the loudest at news conferences.

There were certainly plenty of us crammed into those daily sessions in the peaked attic room of the police annex. There were a handful of local teams from Birmingham and international crews shipped from Latin America. Then came the bookers and the producers, vying for exclusives with the cloistered mother. Then the shows with dramatic theme music, in crews as large as five. And of course, the Aruban print and radio reporters, who quickly became everyone's favorite sources of speculation.
In the early days, there was plenty to cover. The Royal Dutch Marines searched the beaches while helicopters scanned overhead. Hundreds of locals were herded onto tour buses to help with the hunt. Sources were willing to talk, suspects were arrested, and officials gave tempting hints like, "Hold your breath for 24 hours."   The networks sent their satellites and set them up on the roofs of hotels, settling in for the long haul.

Then things started to get weird.

First, CNN ran a report on the island's crack dens and prostitution. Local tourism authorities were outraged. So were a couple of the local reporters, who accused the American press of sabotaging Aruba's economy. By the end of week two, it seemed half of each news conference was dedicated to berating the American press. Even the family's PR agent, who originally represented the tourism authority, was accused of a conflict of interest.

We Americans didn't do ourselves proud, either. Fed up with officials' choice to conduct the first half of each news conference in Papiamento, the local language, some crews took to shouting "English, English!" during the Q-and-A.

Along with Papiamento, Arubans speak English, Spanish and Dutch, but their legal system caused tricky translations. When the first two suspects were arrested (they were later released), the chief prosecutor said they'd been charged with a range of crimes, including murder. A day later, we found ourselves redefining the meaning of "charged" to say first "formally accused" and later "suspected." It turns out they can hold suspects for months without charging them. On July 1, more than a month after Holloway disappeared, the Associated Press had to clarify a story in which the same prosecutor was again quoted as saying three suspects had been charged.

Some of the mistakes were harder to explain. Late one Friday night, CNN reported that at least one of the suspects had confessed. AP quickly followed with a report that he was leading police to the evidence. Moments later, a half dozen news crews sped down a pitch-dark dirt road toward an abandoned beach where police were supposedly digging up a body. Nothing. Officials ranging from the original source right up to the prime minister quickly denied the initial reports.

As guiltily competitive as the rest, I crept out later that night with a Birmingham television crew that was filming distant, spotty footage of men digging in the dunes--probably just local bootleggers pulling up their stash of booze.

Theories abound as to why the media became obsessed with Natalee Holloway's story. It involved a beautiful, blond honor student with influential parents; it occurred in an exotic locale; it started while the jury was out on Jacko. Granted, much of the interest back home stemmed from honest concern about a family's loss. Natalee's mother, Beth Twitty, insisted her daughter represented something perfect and innocent that was lost, a fear that touches the heart of any parent. The outpourings of support in Natalee's hometown and on the island were real, even if they were on camera.

But it also seems the sheer lack of information also spurred the story, because it left plenty of room for speculation, especially as the case progressed. (Aruban officials said releasing details of the investigation could cause a judge to throw out their case.)   Natalee had been sold into white slavery, the blogs said. Natalee had run away on a previous trip abroad, Aruban radio countered. Fellow graduates who were on the trip refused to talk: conspiracy! The lead suspect's dad is a judge: conspiracy! My favorite theory came from Aruban reporters who thought police staged the false leak about a confession to discredit American news sources.
Back home in the newsroom, I continued reporting the story by phone as my Aruba tan faded, trying to confirm information as it flashed on TV. Again and again, I heard sources on the other end sigh and say, "No, that's not right."   I watched the same television personality who "broke" the news about bloodstains in a suspect's car--which turned out not to be bloodstains--criticize authorities for taking Holloway's family on an emotional rollercoaster. But who's really driving?

The Distressed Treatment
"A damsel must be white. This requirement is nonnegotiable. It helps if her frame is of dimensions that breathless cable television reporters can credibly describe as 'petite.'… She must be attractive--also nonnegotiable. Her economic status should be middle class or higher, but an exception can be made in the case of wartime (see: [Jessica] Lynch).

"Put all this together, and you get 24-7 coverage."

--Washington Post columnist Eugene
Robinson, writing on the media's
and the nation's obsession with
white damsels in distress

PHOTO (COLOR): One tiny piece of the media circus: A U.S. television news crew interviews Beth Twitty (center), mother of missing teen Natalee Holloway, in Oranjestad, Aruba. (In the background on this page is a poster released by the Holloway family.)

~~~~~~~~

By Hannah Wolfson


Wolfson covers the city of Mountain Brook, Alabama, Holloway's hometown, for the Birmingham News.



I forgot to highlight some key parts of this article.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: caesu on March 06, 2008, 10:22:37 AM
(http://sxmprivateeye.com/files/images/Today%20O%20and%20C%20-%20NOVA%20-%2027th%20February%202008.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: caesu on March 06, 2008, 10:30:18 AM
BREAKING NEWS
[/b][/color]

http://www.telegraaf.nl/binnenland/3487159/__Ik_weet_wie_Natalee_in_zee_gooide___.html

http://www.revu.nl/10865.Ook_Van_der_Eem_stiekem_gefilmd

"I know who dumped Natalee in the sea"

about the secret taping of Patrick on Telearuba program.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: GBMW on March 06, 2008, 10:30:42 AM
A very rough translation Poentje / Patrick van der Eem (sorry don't have time to really look into right now...I'm also working ;-) :

OPENING UN DIA PINE BIDA Father: ,.......zie you, however, you feel it.
PATRICK no, no, no, but that are it correctly, understand je... but look....
ANNOUNCER: But do you approach me differently than all other persons who you have spoken so far?
PATRICK yes!
PATRICK but actual well, get je....zoals I from the beginning had have been said... ANNOUNCER: If you give your e-mail address and phone number me, then take I contact with you and I by means of e-mail will let know how late it starts exactly and on which Internet site is possible you correct to examine it.
PATRICK my number is 0031....
ANNOUNCER: Under which name do have place I this sukkel? PATRICK closed black ditch.hahahaha..nee..eigen in the ditch.
PATRICK 0031,6107 209....
ANNOUNCER: How many minutes twist you already Riche? Riche: 17 minutes.. ANNOUNCER: Oh, I thought that I was already for 15 minutes to for talking, ah we can still much more chatter.hahaha...
PATRICK I found that, however, spirituously. A
NNOUNCER: If we have enough time still so much, then I like, however, a biertje, do you do want there also one? PATRICK no, no, thanks je... 209 **
ANNOUNCER: Do you do want then no orange juice or something else then?
PATRICK no, no.dank you, I must this way direct with the children there vandoor. ANNOUNCER: This is your number?
PATRICK yes, these are my number
ANNOUNCER: What is you e-mail?
PATRICK P******@planet.nl
ANNOUNCER: Okay.
PATRICK well, but the information exchange with the police force had gone well and they have much information to their beschikking...... (discontinuance)..
ANNOUNCER: takes along my biertje for me.
ANNOUNCER: Yes he..Patrick I you what to tell have rolled..ik in this matter, but the matter did not please me.....
ANNOUNCER: If you want, you can dry yourself face.. PATRICK no, no.ga your pace maar....ik leave this way directly..
ANNOUNCER: And uhm..van all information which they have to their arrangement, was scarcely used.
PATRICK From Joran?
ANNOUNCER: No....wat with Natalee have happened and where nobody makes himself very for.
ANNOUNCER: Information which therefore possibly useful is.....hoe long course this matter already? Three years? Nou dan... the certain about two and a half, perhaps almost three years old.
PATRICK Yes... in May are the three years hear.
ANNOUNCER: Thus, it is not this way that I say that nothing has happened, but as long as the lawsuit runs still, I do leave all options
PATRICK open but what finds you of it yourself? Has it happened on the range or at home? ANNOUNCER: Yes but..weet you what it is..ik have the feeling which if you are with someone for talking, all energy of that person is drawn to your. And you have lived with this boy. He is therefore still spiritual in your present and as a result, has I the feeling which I will doubt to mezelf if I am with your for talking. I feel therefore that you make me uncertain. A feeling which I have experienced never earlier. What I on television saw an incredibly role game was. He had you simply. He knew that you were in search of information and played then cunning to realise this way the closed deal. And the moment you think that you the some are the information gathered with, the contents have been elsewhere differently formulated already. Also if I now against your for talking am, I have the feeling that *** *** **, understand you what I mean?
PATRICK yes..maar look.. since I him knows already so many years, could not produce I it to live whereas with meself, I knew that he involved were and simply the feeling had that I had do something. Get you? He simply need its voice would have let hear and I has used there. For seven months. At the second time that they had looked up him I could gather most of the information.
ANNOUNCER: You then they means him had apprehended?
PATRICK no, them him had locked up keertje and had locked up, but I was in the Netherlands whereas I was for the matter for working. It was on Wednesday and we would start on Monday.
ANNOUNCER: Oh, yes, yes..
PATRICK I have considered even everything, how the surroundings had be arranged with microfoontjes and plants. Of verscholen mini-cameraatjes in plants to even the Internet - and tel. connection which products drawn off. But I you what to tell; he spends a lot of money.
ANNOUNCER: Which parties have been involved if it comes on disbursements. I you say to PATRICK that, however.. I give the same to both parties, but it is a large group. The press gets what but also the police constables concerned. Look, if there occurs a problem of such magnitude on Aruba, then people will get another representation of him, because what he says all ordinary incredibly is.
ANNOUNCER: Yes, it will continue himself repeat.

PATRICK yes, and the complete representation of him will become therefore still more terrible.
PATRICK I will say something you..er are something strange going with the tale concerning those other boys.
PATRICK but I know who threw the body in the ocean


TO BE CONTINUED Comment of Me leaves firstly next clarifying what sees you smoking Patrick in the film is no drugs, but simply a cigarette. And I did not smell also. This small film is concluded with "to be continued" because coming Thursday the whole film is transmitted. It is a film in which much obscene words are spoken, but were the only be able be felt manner Patrick at its ease and "or the record" a conversation to hold. Furthermore this small film has been taken purely incidental and the time further course will stipulate. But coming Thursday, for 21.00 the small film in its whole will be transmitted on Tele Aruba. But because we are still in negotiation with the Netherlands and America for obtaining the necessary uitzendrechten, in which the other side of the medal will be illuminated, in which Mr. had lured Van of the Joran in a car, for as such to information at to come which was zojuist shown. Coming Thursday it will be shown in 20 minutes lasting small film what Mr. Van of the Eem to information has been possible gather from Joran of the ditch.

Locking video fragment:

PATRICK one day he will fall on his face. Your weet not where the other family members are busy. I will ensure that their whole life is embittered. I have more than 120 sms-berichten to my arrangement.
ANNOUNCER: How do we know that this not a trap is between you, *** and Joran? PATRICK when you come to the Netherlands, then I you, however, what to show..haha END PRESENTATION TITLE: UN DIA PINE BIDA


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: klaasend on March 06, 2008, 10:40:25 AM
BREAKING NEWS
[/b][/color]

http://www.telegraaf.nl/binnenland/3487159/__Ik_weet_wie_Natalee_in_zee_gooide___.html

http://www.revu.nl/10865.Ook_Van_der_Eem_stiekem_gefilmd

"I know who dumped Natalee in the sea"

about the secret taping of Patrick on Telearuba program.


"I know who Natalee threw into the sea '
By our reporters
ORANJESTAD (Aruba) - Patrick van der Eem, Joran van der Sloot for hidden cameras in the fall attracted demonstrated himself to be filmed secretly.
   
 

After an interview on Aruba with a local television station showed Van der Eem a number of spicy statements ontlokken, because he thought that cameras had been stopped.

"I know who the body is thrown into the sea," says Van der Eem in Papiaments against the Aruban interviewer. "Joran asked me to 2000 euro for that man to be silent," said van der Eem during the secretly recorded discussion.

The undercover criminal claims that he has the whole operation itself organized. "I have even invented everything, how the environment had to be equipped with microphones and plants. From minicameraatjes hidden in plants to even the Internet and telephone that were drained. "

Van der Eem also says that he expects to be a millionaire by the whole thing. "And I will make sure that Joran and his entire family in their mouth. They can better emigrate to Africa, "Van der Eem threatening.

The interview took place at the end of last month in response to the book that Van der Eem by an American journalist late. The interviewer from the station Un Dia Den Bida face of this newspaper: "I had two cameras included. After the interview I had an off and the other doordraaien. Van der Eem knew that not only was it simply answer my questions. "

The complete interview will be broadcast tonight on the Aruban television. Patrick van der Eem is now back in the Netherlands yesterday and was not reachable for comment.

Nieuwe Revu Meanwhile showed the filpmjes translate. The transcription of the document can be found here. The key passages are shown in bold.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 06, 2008, 10:44:17 AM
Thnaks for that!  These comments are really intersting if I'm getting the translation right:

PATRICK yes, and the complete representation of him will become therefore still more terrible.
PATRICK I will say something you..er are something strange going with the tale concerning those other boys.   PATRICK but I know who threw the body in the ocean


TO BE CONTINUED Comment of Me leaves firstly next clarifying what sees you smoking Patrick in the film is no drugs, but simply a cigarette. And I did not smell also. This small film is concluded with "to be continued" because coming Thursday the whole film is transmitted. It is a film in which much obscene words are spoken, but were the only be able be felt manner Patrick at its ease and "or the record" a conversation to hold. Furthermore this small film has been taken purely incidental and the time further course will stipulate. But coming Thursday, for 21.00 the small film in its whole will be transmitted on Tele Aruba. But because we are still in negotiation with the Netherlands and America for obtaining the necessary uitzendrechten, in which the other side of the medal will be illuminated, in which Mr. had lured Van of the Joran in a car, for as such to information at to come which was zojuist shown. Coming Thursday it will be shown in 20 minutes lasting small film what Mr. Van of the Eem to information has been possible gather from Joran of the ditch.  Locking video fragment:

PATRICK one day he will fall on his face. Your weet not where the other family members are busy. I will ensure that their whole life is embittered. I have more than 120 sms-berichten to my arrangement.
ANNOUNCER: How do we know that this not a trap is between you, *** and Joran? PATRICK when you come to the Netherlands, then I you, however, what to show..haha END PRESENTATION TITLE: UN DIA PINE BIDA


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 06, 2008, 10:48:46 AM
BREAKING NEWS
[/b][/color]

http://www.telegraaf.nl/binnenland/3487159/__Ik_weet_wie_Natalee_in_zee_gooide___.html

http://www.revu.nl/10865.Ook_Van_der_Eem_stiekem_gefilmd

"I know who dumped Natalee in the sea"

about the secret taping of Patrick on Telearuba program.


"I know who Natalee threw into the sea '
By our reporters
ORANJESTAD (Aruba) - Patrick van der Eem, Joran van der Sloot for hidden cameras in the fall attracted demonstrated himself to be filmed secretly.
   
 

After an interview on Aruba with a local television station showed Van der Eem a number of spicy statements ontlokken, because he thought that cameras had been stopped.

"I know who the body is thrown into the sea," says Van der Eem in Papiaments against the Aruban interviewer. "Joran asked me to 2000 euro for that man to be silent," said van der Eem during the secretly recorded discussion.

The undercover criminal claims that he has the whole operation itself organized. "I have even invented everything, how the environment had to be equipped with microphones and plants. From minicameraatjes hidden in plants to even the Internet and telephone that were drained. "

Van der Eem also says that he expects to be a millionaire by the whole thing. "And I will make sure that Joran and his entire family in their mouth. They can better emigrate to Africa, "Van der Eem threatening.

The interview took place at the end of last month in response to the book that Van der Eem by an American journalist late. The interviewer from the station Un Dia Den Bida face of this newspaper: "I had two cameras included. After the interview I had an off and the other doordraaien. Van der Eem knew that not only was it simply answer my questions. "

The complete interview will be broadcast tonight on the Aruban television. Patrick van der Eem is now back in the Netherlands yesterday and was not reachable for comment.

Nieuwe Revu Meanwhile showed the filpmjes translate. The transcription of the document can be found here. The key passages are shown in bold.

So did Patrick say that Joran asked him for $2000 euros to pay off the person that helped him dispose of the body? This is confusing! Does it also say that he was going to record that transfer of money with hidden microphones?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: caesu on March 06, 2008, 10:56:51 AM
main points:

-patrick knew joran for years - they didn't meet in the casino for the first time
-it was patrick plan with the microphones between plants (as in indoor plants) and the micro-camera's. also the tapping of internet and phone connections.
-a lot of parties are involved. the press but also police-officers.
-patrick says there is something strange going on with the other boys (the kalpoe brothers???)
-patrick knows who threy the body in the sea

host asks: how do we know this is not all a trap set up by you and joran?

patrick says: when you come to the netherlands you will see, hahaha



---------------------
revu is a tabloid magazine.
and stan de jong who co-wrote this is an enemy of peter r. de vries.
stan de jong also writes on witheet, steve brown also writes there.

but this is quite bad. i am sure peter r. will write something on his site soon.
maybe patrick is also going to say that he lied all this to the aruban tv.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 06, 2008, 10:56:58 AM
ANYBODY HERE

 ::MonkeyEek::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 06, 2008, 11:03:30 AM
main points:

-patrick knew joran for years - they didn't meet in the casino for the first time
-it was patrick plan with the microphones between plants (as in indoor plants) and the micro-camera's. also the tapping of internet and phone connections.
-a lot of parties are involved. the press but also police-officers.
-patrick says there is something strange going on with the other boys (the kalpoe brothers???)
-patrick knows who threy the body in the sea

host asks: how do we know this is not all a trap set up by you and joran?

patrick says: when you come to the netherlands you will see, hahaha



---------------------
revu is a tabloid magazine.
and stan de jong who co-wrote this is an enemy of peter r. de vries.
stan de jong also writes on witheet, steve brown also writes there.

but this is quite bad. i am sure peter r. will write something on his site soon.
maybe patrick is also going to say that he lied all this to the aruban tv.

Is this a positive or a negative for the case?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Kimmy53 on March 06, 2008, 11:03:32 AM
I'm here,but my mind is going  ::MonkeyConfused::

Is this saying Patrick is playing everyone?  is he playing games?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 06, 2008, 11:05:05 AM
I'm here,but my mind is going  ::MonkeyConfused::

Is this saying Patrick is playing everyone?  is he playing games?


I can't follow this at all!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 06, 2008, 11:06:04 AM
ANYBODY HERE

 ::MonkeyEek::


I'm here BR, still trying to digest this with my morning grits:

"I know who dumped Natalee in the sea"

 ::MonkeyEek:: ::MonkeyEek:: ::MonkeyEek:: ::MonkeyEek:: ::MonkeyEek::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: GBMW on March 06, 2008, 11:07:25 AM
- maybe he meant he knew the case for years (instead of knowing Joran for years)....was familiar with it?
- Patrick probably tried to set up Joran himself and asked / paid a lot of people for help including police?
- the trap thing: there are some dots there also...so probably someone else involved too in that question?
- Patrick seems to know a bit more than he's letting on ;-)

This is all a bit weird....this case is  just getting more complicated...hopefully the full tape will be aired tonight and translated soon. And hopefully some reactions by Patrick / Peter R. de Vries in the Dutch media tonight!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Rob on March 06, 2008, 11:08:42 AM
ANYBODY HERE

 ::MonkeyEek::


I'm here BR, still trying to digest this with my morning grits:

"I know who dumped Natalee in the sea"

 ::MonkeyEek:: ::MonkeyEek:: ::MonkeyEek:: ::MonkeyEek:: ::MonkeyEek::



Hi Dayhiker,

Interesting - fer sure.

So, do I have this right? Patrick knows who did it, but has not said yet?

He better spill the boston beans or he might end up in a fish trap.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 06, 2008, 11:08:52 AM
main points:

-patrick knew joran for years - they didn't meet in the casino for the first time
-it was patrick plan with the microphones between plants (as in indoor plants) and the micro-camera's. also the tapping of internet and phone connections.
-a lot of parties are involved. the press but also police-officers.
-patrick says there is something strange going on with the other boys (the kalpoe brothers???)
-patrick knows who threy the body in the sea

host asks: how do we know this is not all a trap set up by you and joran?

patrick says: when you come to the netherlands you will see, hahaha



---------------------
revu is a tabloid magazine.
and stan de jong who co-wrote this is an enemy of peter r. de vries.
stan de jong also writes on witheet, steve brown also writes there.

but this is quite bad. i am sure peter r. will write something on his site soon.
maybe patrick is also going to say that he lied all this to the aruban tv.


Thanks caesu! To quote an old line, this case just gets "curiouser and curiouser."


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 06, 2008, 11:09:03 AM
- maybe he meant he knew the case for years (instead of knowing Joran for years)....was familiar with it?
- Patrick probably tried to set up Joran himself and asked / paid a lot of people for help including police?
- the trap thing: there are some dots there also...so probably someone else involved too in that question?
- Patrick seems to know a bit more than he's letting on ;-)

This is all a bit weird....this case is  just getting more complicated...hopefully the full tape will be aired tonight and translated soon. And hopefully some reactions by Patrick / Peter R. de Vries in the Dutch media tonight!



What about the 2,000 euros, what does that mean?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 06, 2008, 11:10:36 AM
ANYBODY HERE

 ::MonkeyEek::


I'm here BR, still trying to digest this with my morning grits:

"I know who dumped Natalee in the sea"

 ::MonkeyEek:: ::MonkeyEek:: ::MonkeyEek:: ::MonkeyEek:: ::MonkeyEek::



Hi Dayhiker,

Interesting - fer sure.

So, do I have this right? Patrick knows who did it, but has not said yet?

He better spill the boston beans or he might end up in a fish trap.


Morning Bro, yeppers he better be off the island or he'll end up with his head cut off like the furnace worker.  ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 06, 2008, 11:12:47 AM
This is either going to be the biggest break in this case to date, or, a textbook example of what is meant by the phrase "lost in translation!"

 ::MonkeyShocked::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: klaasend on March 06, 2008, 11:13:00 AM
ANYBODY HERE

 ::MonkeyEek::


I'm here BR, still trying to digest this with my morning grits:

"I know who dumped Natalee in the sea"

 ::MonkeyEek:: ::MonkeyEek:: ::MonkeyEek:: ::MonkeyEek:: ::MonkeyEek::



Hi Dayhiker,

Interesting - fer sure.

So, do I have this right? Patrick knows who did it, but has not said yet?

He better spill the boston beans or he might end up in a fish trap.


Morning Bro, yeppers he better be off the island or he'll end up with his head cut off like the furnace worker.  ::MonkeyConfused::

He's already off the island.  He was just on the DeVries show yesterday or the day before with Beth.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Rob on March 06, 2008, 11:13:03 AM
Dayhiker, I *think* one one the posts said he is back in the Netherlands.

This is getting quite ridiculous. Patrick met with Mos last week - did he disclose that info then?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 06, 2008, 11:13:58 AM
- maybe he meant he knew the case for years (instead of knowing Joran for years)....was familiar with it?
- Patrick probably tried to set up Joran himself and asked / paid a lot of people for help including police?
- the trap thing: there are some dots there also...so probably someone else involved too in that question?
- Patrick seems to know a bit more than he's letting on ;-)

This is all a bit weird....this case is  just getting more complicated...hopefully the full tape will be aired tonight and translated soon. And hopefully some reactions by Patrick / Peter R. de Vries in the Dutch media tonight!




GBMW, was delighted at your earlier post that you are looking into the corruption angle. That seems to be where the case is headed, especially if Bram (and Peter) can secure ALL of the case files, at least what hasn't been destroyed by Jannsen, Van der Straten and Jacobs, wink wink.

Complicated is putting it lightly, lol! Thanks for keeping us posted.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: caesu on March 06, 2008, 11:13:58 AM
main points:

-patrick knew joran for years - they didn't meet in the casino for the first time
-it was patrick plan with the microphones between plants (as in indoor plants) and the micro-camera's. also the tapping of internet and phone connections.
-a lot of parties are involved. the press but also police-officers.
-patrick says there is something strange going on with the other boys (the kalpoe brothers???)
-patrick knows who threy the body in the sea

host asks: how do we know this is not all a trap set up by you and joran?

patrick says: when you come to the netherlands you will see, hahaha



---------------------
revu is a tabloid magazine.
and stan de jong who co-wrote this is an enemy of peter r. de vries.
stan de jong also writes on witheet, steve brown also writes there.

but this is quite bad. i am sure peter r. will write something on his site soon.
maybe patrick is also going to say that he lied all this to the aruban tv.


Thanks caesu! To quote an old line, this case just gets "curiouser and curiouser."

very confusing what this al means.

microphones / camera's in between plants??
so that's not in the car because there are not plants of course.
or were they first trying to do the under cover operation in a home or restaurant.

have to keep in mind that this comes from Revu magazine.
this magazine came last week with the article about Patrick's past.

i am also waiting for a reaction from Peter R. about all this.

the actual broadcast on aruba tv is tonight.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Tater on March 06, 2008, 11:15:11 AM
Somehow I'm getting a real sinking feeling.. ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 06, 2008, 11:15:52 AM

Thanks caesu! To quote an old line, this case just gets "curiouser and curiouser."

very confusing what this al means.

microphones / camera's in between plants??
so that's not in the car because there are not plants of course.
or were they first trying to do the under cover operation in a home or restaurant.

have to keep in mind that this comes from Revu magazine.
this magazine came last week with the article about Patrick's past.

i am also waiting for a reaction from Peter R. about all this.

the actual broadcast on aruba tv is tonight.


Glad I don't have to wait til tonite our time, LOL!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Rob on March 06, 2008, 11:17:44 AM
caesu, weren't there cams between some plants with the Poentje interview the other night? After Patrick though the interview was over and the cameras removed the interviewed continued and Patrick was unaware he was video'd?

I have no idea....I'm confused.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 06, 2008, 11:17:46 AM
main points:

-patrick knew joran for years - they didn't meet in the casino for the first time
-it was patrick plan with the microphones between plants (as in indoor plants) and the micro-camera's. also the tapping of internet and phone connections.
-a lot of parties are involved. the press but also police-officers.
-patrick says there is something strange going on with the other boys (the kalpoe brothers???)
-patrick knows who threy the body in the sea

host asks: how do we know this is not all a trap set up by you and joran?

patrick says: when you come to the netherlands you will see, hahaha



---------------------
revu is a tabloid magazine.
and stan de jong who co-wrote this is an enemy of peter r. de vries.
stan de jong also writes on witheet, steve brown also writes there.

but this is quite bad. i am sure peter r. will write something on his site soon.
maybe patrick is also going to say that he lied all this to the aruban tv.


Thanks caesu! To quote an old line, this case just gets "curiouser and curiouser."

very confusing what this al means.

microphones / camera's in between plants??
so that's not in the car because there are not plants of course.
or were they first trying to do the under cover operation in a home or restaurant.

have to keep in mind that this comes from Revu magazine.
this magazine came last week with the article about Patrick's past.

i am also waiting for a reaction from Peter R. about all this.

the actual broadcast on aruba tv is tonight.

When I read "plants" I was thinking the same thing, does that mean there is other audio/video of conversations between Patrick and Joran in a location other than the car?




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 06, 2008, 11:19:54 AM
Dayhiker, I *think* one one the posts said he is back in the Netherlands.

This is getting quite ridiculous. Patrick met with Mos last week - did he disclose that info then?


Very crazy, much harder to untangle than the case itself. Changes the whole picture if the tapes go much deeper than what we already know. The word bizarre comes to mind.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Rob on March 06, 2008, 11:20:05 AM
When I read "plants" I was thinking the same thing, does that mean there is other audio/video of conversations between Patrick and Joran in a location other than the car?

That seems to be what is being said. What else could it imply?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: GBMW on March 06, 2008, 11:20:15 AM
- maybe he meant he knew the case for years (instead of knowing Joran for years)....was familiar with it?
- Patrick probably tried to set up Joran himself and asked / paid a lot of people for help including police?
- the trap thing: there are some dots there also...so probably someone else involved too in that question?
- Patrick seems to know a bit more than he's letting on ;-)

This is all a bit weird....this case is  just getting more complicated...hopefully the full tape will be aired tonight and translated soon. And hopefully some reactions by Patrick / Peter R. de Vries in the Dutch media tonight!



What about the 2,000 euros, what does that mean?
Ik weet wie het lichaam in zee heeft gegooid,” zegt Van der Eem in het Papiaments tegen de Arubaanse interviewer. „Joran vroeg me om 2000 euro om die man te laten zwijgen,”

I know who threw the body into the sea / ocean, says Van der Eem in Papiamento to the interviewer. Joran asked me for 2000 Euros to keep the man silent.

This quote is NOT in the transcript from the Nieuwe Revue so I don't know where it came from....but Patrick is officially quoted so maybe de Telegraaf (where this comes from) has more information.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 06, 2008, 11:20:49 AM
Or, does that he mean between the plants during the TeleAruba interview??

Who got paid 2,000 euro, seems like a paltry amount to dispose of a body, if that's correct??


HELP!!!!!   SOMEONE PLEASE EXPLAIN THIS MADNESS!!!


 ::MonkeyWaa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: JE on March 06, 2008, 11:21:25 AM
- maybe he meant he knew the case for years (instead of knowing Joran for years)....was familiar with it?
- Patrick probably tried to set up Joran himself and asked / paid a lot of people for help including police?
- the trap thing: there are some dots there also...so probably someone else involved too in that question?
- Patrick seems to know a bit more than he's letting on ;-)

This is all a bit weird....this case is  just getting more complicated...hopefully the full tape will be aired tonight and translated soon. And hopefully some reactions by Patrick / Peter R. de Vries in the Dutch media tonight!





What about the 2,000 euros, what does that mean?

the way i understood it: joran asked patrick for 2000 euros to give to the guy who helped him dump the body
Buying silence


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 06, 2008, 11:21:55 AM

When I read "plants" I was thinking the same thing, does that mean there is other audio/video of conversations between Patrick and Joran in a location other than the car?


Was Patrick doing his own investigation/taping of Joran before Peter got involved?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: caesu on March 06, 2008, 11:21:58 AM
caesu, weren't there cams between some plants with the Poentje interview the other night? After Patrick though the interview was over and the cameras removed the interviewed continued and Patrick was unaware he was video'd?

I have no idea....I'm confused.

no, he was talking about the under cover operation in the netherlands to get joran to confess.

but it is all very very confusing now.
i am sure the next few hours peter r. comes with a reaction.

keep refreshing his site i would suggest.
http://www.peterrdevries.nl/

the earlier column of peter was also about patrick, debunking last weeks article in Revu.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 06, 2008, 11:23:56 AM

What about the 2,000 euros, what does that mean?

the way i understood it: joran asked patrick for 2000 euros to give to the guy who helped him dump the body
Buying silence


Greetings JE. Raises the question as to whether Patrick paid the actual dumper or Joran was trying to bilk him.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Rob on March 06, 2008, 11:24:16 AM
- maybe he meant he knew the case for years (instead of knowing Joran for years)....was familiar with it?
- Patrick probably tried to set up Joran himself and asked / paid a lot of people for help including police?
- the trap thing: there are some dots there also...so probably someone else involved too in that question?
- Patrick seems to know a bit more than he's letting on ;-)

This is all a bit weird....this case is  just getting more complicated...hopefully the full tape will be aired tonight and translated soon. And hopefully some reactions by Patrick / Peter R. de Vries in the Dutch media tonight!



What about the 2,000 euros, what does that mean?
Ik weet wie het lichaam in zee heeft gegooid,” zegt Van der Eem in het Papiaments tegen de Arubaanse interviewer. „Joran vroeg me om 2000 euro om die man te laten zwijgen,”

I know who threw the body into the sea / ocean, says Van der Eem in Papiamento to the interviewer. Joran asked me for 2000 Euros to keep the man silent.

This quote is NOT in the transcript from the Nieuwe Revue so I don't know where it came from....but Patrick is officially quoted so maybe de Telegraaf (where this comes from) has more information.

translation - Joran is shaking Patrick down for 2000 euros. The only motivation the "person" who threw Natalee into the ocean needs to to keep quiet so he doesn't get charged with murder.

After 3 years, I doubt that person is all of a sudden shaking Joran down for 2000 euros. That makes no sense, but Joran never does either....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 06, 2008, 11:25:46 AM
- maybe he meant he knew the case for years (instead of knowing Joran for years)....was familiar with it?
- Patrick probably tried to set up Joran himself and asked / paid a lot of people for help including police?
- the trap thing: there are some dots there also...so probably someone else involved too in that question?
- Patrick seems to know a bit more than he's letting on ;-)

This is all a bit weird....this case is  just getting more complicated...hopefully the full tape will be aired tonight and translated soon. And hopefully some reactions by Patrick / Peter R. de Vries in the Dutch media tonight!



What about the 2,000 euros, what does that mean?
Ik weet wie het lichaam in zee heeft gegooid,” zegt Van der Eem in het Papiaments tegen de Arubaanse interviewer. „Joran vroeg me om 2000 euro om die man te laten zwijgen,”

I know who threw the body into the sea / ocean, says Van der Eem in Papiamento to the interviewer. Joran asked me for 2000 Euros to keep the man silent.

This quote is NOT in the transcript from the Nieuwe Revue so I don't know where it came from....but Patrick is officially quoted so maybe de Telegraaf (where this comes from) has more information.

Ok, that is what I thought but that begs the question how can the person who disposed of the body be in a position to threathen Joran into giving him $2,000?? That person would be turning himself and Joran in if that were the case!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: caesu on March 06, 2008, 11:26:33 AM
"joran gave patrick 2000 euro.
so patrick wouldn't say the name of the person how dumped her in the ocean.
patrick knows the name of this person."

http://www.nu.nl/news/1467475/10/Van_der_Eem_beweert_Joran_al_jaren_te_kennen.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 06, 2008, 11:26:59 AM

Morning Bro, yeppers he better be off the island or he'll end up with his head cut off like the furnace worker.  ::MonkeyConfused::

He's already off the island.  He was just on the DeVries show yesterday or the day before with Beth.


Pardon my pre-caffiene slowness this morning, haven't reached the Stage 4 Lucid threshhold yet LOL! Yes, makes sense!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 06, 2008, 11:27:57 AM
"joran gave patrick 2000 euro.
so patrick wouldn't say the name of the person how dumped her in the ocean.
patrick knows the name of this person."

http://www.nu.nl/news/1467475/10/Van_der_Eem_beweert_Joran_al_jaren_te_kennen.html


So now it's Joran paying Patrick?  ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Rob on March 06, 2008, 11:28:36 AM
"joran gave patrick 2000 euro.
so patrick wouldn't say the name of the person how dumped her in the ocean.
patrick knows the name of this person."

http://www.nu.nl/news/1467475/10/Van_der_Eem_beweert_Joran_al_jaren_te_kennen.html

ohhhh...

I hope Patrick makes that name known instantly so it can be investigated. And why the heck is he sitting there next to Beth and holding that info from her...

I better shut up about Patrick


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: JE on March 06, 2008, 11:29:25 AM

What about the 2,000 euros, what does that mean?

the way i understood it: joran asked patrick for 2000 euros to give to the guy who helped him dump the body
Buying silence


Greetings JE. Raises the question as to whether Patrick paid the actual dumper or Joran was trying to bilk him.

Hey dayhiker i am wondering where de Telegraaf got this info from it is not in the transcript This gets weirder all the time


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 06, 2008, 11:30:17 AM

translation - Joran is shaking Patrick down for 2000 euros. The only motivation the "person" who threw Natalee into the ocean needs to to keep quiet so he doesn't get charged with murder.

After 3 years, I doubt that person is all of a sudden shaking Joran down for 2000 euros. That makes no sense, but Joran never does either....


Interesting also is that 2000 euros ain't really that much money considering the extreme explosiveness of Natalee's case.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: BUCKSHOT on March 06, 2008, 11:31:37 AM
Remember that Hans Mos and Aruba has had a chance to poison talk to Patrick about everything.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 06, 2008, 11:31:39 AM
"joran gave patrick 2000 euro.
so patrick wouldn't say the name of the person how dumped her in the ocean.
patrick knows the name of this person."

http://www.nu.nl/news/1467475/10/Van_der_Eem_beweert_Joran_al_jaren_te_kennen.html


So now it's Joran paying Patrick?  ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyConfused::

Again, that makes no sense at all. What the hell is he going to do with a measley 2000 euro!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: caesu on March 06, 2008, 11:31:53 AM
"joran gave patrick 2000 euro.
so patrick wouldn't say the name of the person how dumped her in the ocean.
patrick knows the name of this person."

http://www.nu.nl/news/1467475/10/Van_der_Eem_beweert_Joran_al_jaren_te_kennen.html

that's what it is says there.
so confusing now. but this news just broke few hours ago.

i am going to give it a rest and wait for peter r. response.

So now it's Joran paying Patrick?  ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: BUCKSHOT on March 06, 2008, 11:32:48 AM
This case just can not get any stranger.......Or can it??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 06, 2008, 11:32:48 AM


Greetings JE. Raises the question as to whether Patrick paid the actual dumper or Joran was trying to bilk him.

Hey dayhiker i am wondering where de Telegraaf got this info from it is not in the transcript This gets weirder all the time


Like a Monty Python movie, lol! Thank you all for getting us the information so fast even if it is quite jumbled right now!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 06, 2008, 11:32:53 AM
I have been doing a little scholarly research you could say and came across this very insightful journal article. I don't know if many of you have read this or seen it before but I present it here in its entirety:


Title: A Media Circus in Paradise. By: Wolfson, Hannah, American Journalism Review, 10678654, Aug/Sep2005, Vol. 27, Issue 4
Database: Communication & Mass Media CompleteA Media Circus in Paradise
Contents
The Distressed Treatment
Section: DROP CAP
LETTER FROM ARUBA


An Alabama reporter discovers the press doesn't quite shine in the Caribbean sun

It's the first news conference, and the police superintendent can't find the keys. But no one's told TV. One by one, the camera crews push closer, reporters from CNN and Fox News squeezing onto the narrow sidewalk between a line of parked cars and the locked door of the police annex. Jan van der Straaten, the man in charge of Aruba's investigation into Natalee Holloway's disappearance, is stuck, and soon he's sweating in the Caribbean sun.

A few locals slow down as they drive by to see what's happening while uniformed officers smirk outside the main police station across the street. Finally the door opens and everyone tumbles inside, following van der Straaten up a narrow stairway.

Welcome to the media circus, Aruba style.

OK, I'm just a novice, a print reporter from Alabama covering what started out as a hometown story about a missing teen and mushroomed into nonstop national news. Maybe the crews that converge on events like the Michael Jackson trial and the Runaway Bride are always like this. Maybe it was just the bright tropical light and the strangeness of working in paradise that made things look so absurd. All I know is, after nine days in Aruba, I see what we in the media do--and I say we with great trepidation--in a whole new light.

In fact, looking at it from the Arubans' perspective, I'm a little confused about what we do. Most of the job seems to consist of waiting around in hotel lobbies and seeing who can shout the loudest at news conferences.

There were certainly plenty of us crammed into those daily sessions in the peaked attic room of the police annex. There were a handful of local teams from Birmingham and international crews shipped from Latin America. Then came the bookers and the producers, vying for exclusives with the cloistered mother. Then the shows with dramatic theme music, in crews as large as five. And of course, the Aruban print and radio reporters, who quickly became everyone's favorite sources of speculation.

In the early days, there was plenty to cover. The Royal Dutch Marines searched the beaches while helicopters scanned overhead. Hundreds of locals were herded onto tour buses to help with the hunt. Sources were willing to talk, suspects were arrested, and officials gave tempting hints like, "Hold your breath for 24 hours." The networks sent their satellites and set them up on the roofs of hotels, settling in for the long haul.

Then things started to get weird.

First, CNN ran a report on the island's crack dens and prostitution. Local tourism authorities were outraged. So were a couple of the local reporters, who accused the American press of sabotaging Aruba's economy. By the end of week two, it seemed half of each news conference was dedicated to berating the American press. Even the family's PR agent, who originally represented the tourism authority, was accused of a conflict of interest.

We Americans didn't do ourselves proud, either. Fed up with officials' choice to conduct the first half of each news conference in Papiamento, the local language, some crews took to shouting "English, English!" during the Q-and-A.

Along with Papiamento, Arubans speak English, Spanish and Dutch, but their legal system caused tricky translations. When the first two suspects were arrested (they were later released), the chief prosecutor said they'd been charged with a range of crimes, including murder. A day later, we found ourselves redefining the meaning of "charged" to say first "formally accused" and later "suspected." It turns out they can hold suspects for months without charging them. On July 1, more than a month after Holloway disappeared, the Associated Press had to clarify a story in which the same prosecutor was again quoted as saying three suspects had been charged.

Some of the mistakes were harder to explain. Late one Friday night, CNN reported that at least one of the suspects had confessed. AP quickly followed with a report that he was leading police to the evidence. Moments later, a half dozen news crews sped down a pitch-dark dirt road toward an abandoned beach where police were supposedly digging up a body. Nothing. Officials ranging from the original source right up to the prime minister quickly denied the initial reports.

As guiltily competitive as the rest, I crept out later that night with a Birmingham television crew that was filming distant, spotty footage of men digging in the dunes--probably just local bootleggers pulling up their stash of booze.

Theories abound as to why the media became obsessed with Natalee Holloway's story. It involved a beautiful, blond honor student with influential parents; it occurred in an exotic locale; it started while the jury was out on Jacko. Granted, much of the interest back home stemmed from honest concern about a family's loss. Natalee's mother, Beth Twitty, insisted her daughter represented something perfect and innocent that was lost, a fear that touches the heart of any parent. The outpourings of support in Natalee's hometown and on the island were real, even if they were on camera.

But it also seems the sheer lack of information also spurred the story, because it left plenty of room for speculation, especially as the case progressed. (Aruban officials said releasing details of the investigation could cause a judge to throw out their case.) Natalee had been sold into white slavery, the blogs said. Natalee had run away on a previous trip abroad, Aruban radio countered. Fellow graduates who were on the trip refused to talk: conspiracy! The lead suspect's dad is a judge: conspiracy! My favorite theory came from Aruban reporters who thought police staged the false leak about a confession to discredit American news sources.

Back home in the newsroom, I continued reporting the story by phone as my Aruba tan faded, trying to confirm information as it flashed on TV. Again and again, I heard sources on the other end sigh and say, "No, that's not right." I watched the same television personality who "broke" the news about bloodstains in a suspect's car--which turned out not to be bloodstains--criticize authorities for taking Holloway's family on an emotional rollercoaster. But who's really driving?

The Distressed Treatment
"A damsel must be white. This requirement is nonnegotiable. It helps if her frame is of dimensions that breathless cable television reporters can credibly describe as 'petite.'… She must be attractive--also nonnegotiable. Her economic status should be middle class or higher, but an exception can be made in the case of wartime (see: [Jessica] Lynch).

"Put all this together, and you get 24-7 coverage."

--Washington Post columnist Eugene
Robinson, writing on the media's
and the nation's obsession with
white damsels in distress

PHOTO (COLOR): One tiny piece of the media circus: A U.S. television news crew interviews Beth Twitty (center), mother of missing teen Natalee Holloway, in Oranjestad, Aruba. (In the background on this page is a poster released by the Holloway family.)

~~~~~~~~

By Hannah Wolfson


Wolfson covers the city of Mountain Brook, Alabama, Holloway's hometown, for the Birmingham News.



Thanks Blade

When I compare your post (above) and *******'s post (below) ... a picture emerges that implies that Joran or ... whoever confessed on June 10, 2005 ... knew where Natalee's remains had been originally buried but ... was unaware that she had been moved.

Janet

++++++++++++

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2668.msg360847;topicseen#msg360847

*******:

Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
« Reply #755 on: March 04, 2008, 10:33:01 PM »

I just posted this recently but I want to make sure we have this all in the same place.

More on white truck....from Fox's At Large Show - Sunday July 31st, 2005


Jossy states......

The latest information we have in the investigation is that the police are actively looking for a K-Swiss style shoe - size 14 that belongs to Joran van der Sloot.  Now the police have information that he lost either one or both of his shoes that early morning in which Natalee disappeared. That would be the 30th of May.

The witness by the landfill tells us that he was sitting in his car and he saw a white pick-up truck drive in, their were 3 occupants and 2 of them got out. Picked up a trash can plastic bag, the black ones, the big ones and they carried it over to where this whole bunch of other bags and rubble was. Now when they were doing that, he says that some blond hair fell out of the bag because the bag was not properly sealed and that he could see parts of human body and then he saw them dig a little among the rubble that was there already and then place this bag there then covered with some other near by lying bags and then put a small pool, plastic pool that babies swim in or bathe in on top of it and then put some more stuff and then walked away.  He also told us that there was another car outside of the cyclone fence, looking on. The man in that car stepped out, he stood by the fence and looked at the whole proceeding's.  We do believe him because from the beginning he has been reliable with his story and it does fit the description we got from another witness between the Holiday Inn and the Marriott Hotel.

The letter that we received is from the wife of the person with whom this guy was on the beach with between the Holiday Inn and Marriott wrote us because she was getting a annoyed that no one was paying attention to the declaration that this man gave to her husband at the hotel.

I will read it for you... The day after Natalee was missing a person called Barbeshe (Bar-Be-she) told a story that the night before he saw 3 people in front of the Holiday Inn with a girl's body. That they tried to take a towel from one the "walks fence's" (really hard to understand him here - sounds like he says "water sports dance or fence") to wrap the body and they could not get it down. Then one of them went to the garbage cans at the Holiday Inn and pulled the bags out and wrapped the body, then put her in the white pick-up and left. They went out and turned left towards the lighthouse and turned off on a dirt road and dug a hole and put her in it and threw out the shovel. He also said he told the police and they sent him on a 4 wheeler to try and find, locate the spot and he had been threatened by these people. This person has been seen on the beach everyday has no longer been seen after this and was known to be there daily.

http://www.riehlworldview.com/carnivorous_conservative/2005/08/fyi.html



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 06, 2008, 11:33:29 AM
"joran gave patrick 2000 euro.
so patrick wouldn't say the name of the person how dumped her in the ocean.
patrick knows the name of this person."

http://www.nu.nl/news/1467475/10/Van_der_Eem_beweert_Joran_al_jaren_te_kennen.html

ohhhh...

I hope Patrick makes that name known instantly so it can be investigated. And why the heck is he sitting there next to Beth and holding that info from her...

I better shut up about Patrick

Unless he was going to bribe the Van der Sloots to become a "millionaire."


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 06, 2008, 11:33:59 AM
"joran gave patrick 2000 euro.
so patrick wouldn't say the name of the person how dumped her in the ocean.
patrick knows the name of this person."

http://www.nu.nl/news/1467475/10/Van_der_Eem_beweert_Joran_al_jaren_te_kennen.html


So now it's Joran paying Patrick?  ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyConfused::

Again, that makes no sense at all. What the hell is he going to do with a measley 2000 euro!


That has stood out to me BR, such a small amount of money.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Destiny on March 06, 2008, 11:34:18 AM
Going on about the shoes (srry all) Lets assume he lost a shoe during whatever activity. Would he be so stupid as to take the one he has left, including the eventual forensic traces, home and put it in a closet for the police to find??


Very stupid and that doesn't make sense either,his father would have made sure those shoes were nowhere near that house...Everyone knows you can't buy just one shoe! Which leads me to the next question..Why would Freddy feel obligated or volunteer to buy him a new pair of shoes?

Good question. 
The entire shoe thing has been a puzzlement from Day One.  I keep asking myself :  How does Joran benefit from his various shoe stories?  1] They must have some evidence on them.   The rest is a misty cloud of "what ifs" !  I still say a large boned kid like that wears a very large shoe.

Paulus the Pervus looks like a pretty good sized man...wonder what size shoe he wears....Daurey and Urine like to *swing* in the same circles...wonder of Pervus had a pair of size 14 Kswiss tennies...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Rob on March 06, 2008, 11:35:57 AM
"joran gave patrick 2000 euro.
so patrick wouldn't say the name of the person how dumped her in the ocean.
patrick knows the name of this person."

http://www.nu.nl/news/1467475/10/Van_der_Eem_beweert_Joran_al_jaren_te_kennen.html

ohhhh...

I hope Patrick makes that name known instantly so it can be investigated. And why the heck is he sitting there next to Beth and holding that info from her...

I better shut up about Patrick

Unless he was going to bribe the Van der Sloots to become a "millionaire."

We need obi wan kenobi - he's our only hope LOL


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 06, 2008, 11:36:57 AM
"joran gave patrick 2000 euro.
so patrick wouldn't say the name of the person how dumped her in the ocean.
patrick knows the name of this person."

http://www.nu.nl/news/1467475/10/Van_der_Eem_beweert_Joran_al_jaren_te_kennen.html


So now it's Joran paying Patrick?  ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyConfused::

Again, that makes no sense at all. What the hell is he going to do with a measley 2000 euro!


That has stood out to me BR, such a small amount of money.

But maybe a lot of money to someone that works at an internet cafe or is not "well off!"


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on March 06, 2008, 11:38:36 AM
(http://i78.photobucket.com/albums/j120/Bearlyhere/disregard.jpg)

Dim the Avatars, it's full speed ahead!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Rob on March 06, 2008, 11:39:19 AM
So, Patrick has known this name for some time and has not disclosed it?

Did he tell Godfather Peter R?

Is the name caught on tape?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Rob on March 06, 2008, 11:41:07 AM
So, Patrick has known this name for some time and has not disclosed it?

Did he tell Godfather Peter R?

Is the name caught on tape?

this new 'episode' is just plain nuts.

did Mos threaten Patrick with the "arrest" last week because he knew Patrick knew the name?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on March 06, 2008, 11:43:23 AM
"joran gave patrick 2000 euro.
so patrick wouldn't say the name of the person how dumped her in the ocean.
patrick knows the name of this person."

http://www.nu.nl/news/1467475/10/Van_der_Eem_beweert_Joran_al_jaren_te_kennen.html

ohhhh...

I hope Patrick makes that name known instantly so it can be investigated. And why the heck is he sitting there next to Beth and holding that info from her...

I better shut up about Patrick

Unless he was going to bribe the Van der Sloots to become a "millionaire."

We need obi wan kenobi - he's our only hope LOL

 ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 06, 2008, 11:43:47 AM
So, Patrick has known this name for some time and has not disclosed it?

Did he tell Godfather Peter R?

Is the name caught on tape?

this new 'episode' is just plain nuts.

did Mos threaten Patrick with the "arrest" last week because he knew Patrick knew the name?
Great point, and also remember that Patrick said he can "be quiet also" or something to that effect. One other thing, if Patrick new Joran for a long time that might explain why Joran said he trusts him just like he does "Duary". At the time, people were questioning why if Joran only met Patrick would he become so attached to him to make such a statement. That statement now makes perfect sense, if the relationship goes back years.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: BUCKSHOT on March 06, 2008, 11:48:19 AM
How do you think Paulus' composure is these days?

(1) Scared, knowing that it may be a matter of time before the game is over...

OR

(2) Calm, cool, and collected knowing that nothing will happen in the end...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: JE on March 06, 2008, 11:49:57 AM
So, Patrick has known this name for some time and has not disclosed it?

Did he tell Godfather Peter R?

Is the name caught on tape?

this new 'episode' is just plain nuts.

did Mos threaten Patrick with the "arrest" last week because he knew Patrick knew the name?
Great point, and also remember that Patrick said he can "be quiet also" or something to that effect. One other thing, if Patrick new Joran for a long time that might explain why Joran said he trusts him just like he does "Duary". At the time, people were questioning why if Joran only met Patrick would he become so attached to him to make such a statement. That statement now makes perfect sense, if the relationship goes back years.

I dont think mos knew about the tele aruba recording then


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: sb on March 06, 2008, 11:50:15 AM
Still catching up from about 3 threads ago... but I haven't seen the point made yet...

1. The Persistence cannot remain in an area where there is a threat of impending hostilities.

2. The Vice-President of the United States does not often travel to Aruba, nor does he travel anywhere unless there are matters of great importance to be resolved.

What may be about to happen down there in Aruba and Venezuela is just what we have been hoping for... that retribution comes from a different quarter than where we think.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 06, 2008, 11:51:46 AM
How do you think Paulus' composure is these days?

(1) Scared, knowing that it may be a matter of time before the game is over...

OR

(2) Calm, cool, and collected knowing that nothing will happen in the end...

I for one beleive today is the tipping point in this case.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 06, 2008, 11:52:37 AM
BREAKING NEWS
[/b][/color]

http://www.telegraaf.nl/binnenland/3487159/__Ik_weet_wie_Natalee_in_zee_gooide___.html

http://www.revu.nl/10865.Ook_Van_der_Eem_stiekem_gefilmd

"I know who dumped Natalee in the sea"

about the secret taping of Patrick on Telearuba program.


"I know who Natalee threw into the sea '
By our reporters

ORANJESTAD (Aruba) - Patrick van der Eem, Joran van der Sloot for hidden cameras in the fall attracted demonstrated himself to be filmed secretly.
   

After an interview on Aruba with a local television station showed Van der Eem a number of spicy statements ontlokken, because he thought that cameras had been stopped.

"I know who the body is thrown into the sea," says Van der Eem in Papiaments against the Aruban interviewer. "Joran asked me to 2000 euro for that man to be silent," said van der Eem during the secretly recorded discussion.  

The undercover criminal claims that he has the whole operation itself organized. "I have even invented everything, how the environment had to be equipped with microphones and plants. From minicameraatjes hidden in plants to even the Internet and telephone that were drained. "

Van der Eem also says that he expects to be a millionaire by the whole thing. "And I will make sure that Joran and his entire family in their mouth. They can better emigrate to Africa, "Van der Eem threatening.  

The interview took place at the end of last month in response to the book that Van der Eem by an American journalist late. The interviewer from the station Un Dia Den Bida face of this newspaper: "I had two cameras included. After the interview I had an off and the other doordraaien. Van der Eem knew that not only was it simply answer my questions. "

The complete interview will be broadcast tonight on the Aruban television. Patrick van der Eem is now back in the Netherlands yesterday and was not reachable for comment.

Nieuwe Revu Meanwhile showed the filpmjes translate. The transcription of the document can be found here. The key passages are shown in bold.

 ::MonkeyShocked::

I believe if Patrick van der Eem is going to talk ... he should reveal the truth and ... refrain from insinuations.  His relationship with Joran van der Sloot should have taught him that the VDS' have ways of dealing with those who have the ability to implication them in the events of that morning when Natalee Holloway went missing.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 06, 2008, 11:52:57 AM
Still catching up from about 3 threads ago... but I haven't seen the point made yet...

1. The Persistence cannot remain in an area where there is a threat of impending hostilities.

2. The Vice-President of the United States does not often travel to Aruba, nor does he travel anywhere unless there are matters of great importance to be resolved.

What may be about to happen down there in Aruba and Venezuela is just what we have been hoping for... that retribution comes from a different quarter than where we think.


LOL. Have you read this thread yet???


 ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 06, 2008, 11:56:18 AM
So, Patrick has known this name for some time and has not disclosed it?

Did he tell Godfather Peter R?

Is the name caught on tape?

this new 'episode' is just plain nuts.

did Mos threaten Patrick with the "arrest" last week because he knew Patrick knew the name?
Great point, and also remember that Patrick said he can "be quiet also" or something to that effect. One other thing, if Patrick new Joran for a long time that might explain why Joran said he trusts him just like he does "Duary". At the time, people were questioning why if Joran only met Patrick would he become so attached to him to make such a statement. That statement now makes perfect sense, if the relationship goes back years.

I dont think mos knew about the tele aruba recording then

Mos could have found out before the recording.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Destiny on March 06, 2008, 11:57:05 AM
Peter R. de Vries is working on some new, very promising, leads but doesn't know yet if there will a show about it.

I get this from an interview that the company I work for did with him...it hasn't been aired yet (and of course I don't if or when that will happen).

I did get an ok to do some more research for the corruptionlink with this case! Many thanks to Jo-An who gave me the link with the summary; it helped a lot!

I must emphasise this still doesn't mean an awful lot; checking 'a story' a bit more happens but at least the request / idea wasn't a no ;-)

There is so much corruption around this case so I think I need to focus on the most important ones. Because otherwise it could be overwhelming. So some feedback would be very much appreciated.....



GB....Kudos to you for bringing this subject up at your Staff meeting!...and the Biggest Bunch of Monkey Bananas I can carry for getting the ok to follow up on some research!!!

((((((((((Hugs to GB))))))))))))))

Destiny


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on March 06, 2008, 11:57:23 AM
Didn't the taping happen after Mos was bellowing for Patrick and not before?

I am not ready to throw Patrick under the bus yet.  I'll wait until things are clearer and then decide.  If he does need to be thrown under the bus, I'm driving!

We will all just have to wait together, we've done it before.  Each time we get a little closer to the truth.

(http://i78.photobucket.com/albums/j120/Bearlyhere/br-38011.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 06, 2008, 12:04:13 PM
Didn't the taping happen after Mos was bellowing for Patrick and not before?

I am not ready to throw Patrick under the bus yet.  I'll wait until things are clearer and then decide.  If he does need to be thrown under the bus, I'm driving!

We will all just have to wait together, we've done it before.  Each time we get a little closer to the truth.

(http://i78.photobucket.com/albums/j120/Bearlyhere/br-38011.jpg)

Let's assume the worst, that Joran told Patrick who "disposed" of the body, this would have occured after the car taping and the "Daury" comment and that Patrick was going to use this information to bribe the VDS' and become a millionaire. If all this were true why would Patrick open his mouth to some interviewer he just met and say "I know who threw her in the ocean?" That would be stupid and doesn't make sense in this scenario, which means that another scenario is likely unfolding.

If he does know, I believe he is holding back that name in accordance with "some kind" of investigation going on here.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on March 06, 2008, 12:08:09 PM
Didn't the taping happen after Mos was bellowing for Patrick and not before?

I am not ready to throw Patrick under the bus yet.  I'll wait until things are clearer and then decide.  If he does need to be thrown under the bus, I'm driving!

We will all just have to wait together, we've done it before.  Each time we get a little closer to the truth.

(http://i78.photobucket.com/albums/j120/Bearlyhere/br-38011.jpg)

Let's assume the worst, that Joran told Patrick who "disposed" of the body, this would have occured after the car taping and the "Daury" comment and that Patrick was going to use this information to bribe the VDS' and become a millionaire. If all this were true why would Patrick open his mouth to some interviewer he just met and say "I know who threw her in the ocean?" That would be stupid and doesn't make sense in this scenario, which means that another scenario is likely unfolding.

If he does know, I believe he is holding back that name in accordance with "some kind" of investigation going on here.

I am not sure wbat is worse, him knowiing or not knowing.
                         ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Castaglance on March 06, 2008, 12:09:08 PM
I used to be a trusting, optimistic, naive american
and am not much for speculation but, what if....
When Patrick went to the authorities before Peter (I read that here right?) about Joran and we heard he was told no dice (but MOS said to take it to PDV and make it look undercover sans his knowledge) and this was an elaborate set-up with Joran ahead of time knowing his role to get off the hook (he said he wasn't mad at Patrick) , make Patrick $ (book deal and perhaps $$$ from Paulus income stream) and pacify the Americans so Aruba could get back to business, no harm no foul
no one is that evil are they?

I have no facts just unease over all this, I think Patrick & Peter are good guys...so far


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Kimmy53 on March 06, 2008, 12:11:17 PM
Does anyone know how much time lapsed between the last taping in the car and Peter's show?  Maybe Patrick did some taping of his own - I would imagine he had some kind of idea what kind of $$$$ he could make..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 06, 2008, 12:17:14 PM
There are three scenarios:

1. The quote is not correct and Patrick never said that.

2. He lied to the interviewer and it is not true.

3. He said it to the interviewer and it is true.

4. He said it to the interviewer and he believes it to be true,m but, it in fact is not true, meaning Joran lied to him.

One of these four scenarios is the truth of the matter. If Patrick lied the question then is why? What is the motive for doing so? If he is telling the truth and it is indeed true, why would you tell such crucial information to a reporter, regardless whether you knew you were being recorded or not?

Either way, Patrick has some explaining to do!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 06, 2008, 12:17:56 PM
Didn't the taping happen after Mos was bellowing for Patrick and not before?

I am not ready to throw Patrick under the bus yet.  I'll wait until things are clearer and then decide.  If he does need to be thrown under the bus, I'm driving!

We will all just have to wait together, we've done it before.  Each time we get a little closer to the truth.

(http://i78.photobucket.com/albums/j120/Bearlyhere/br-38011.jpg)


Waiting. We're good at that. Morning Bearly!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 06, 2008, 12:19:48 PM
Self edit: There are FOUR scenarios:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 06, 2008, 12:20:31 PM
I used to be a trusting, optimistic, naive american
and am not much for speculation but, what if....
When Patrick went to the authorities before Peter (I read that here right?) about Joran and we heard he was told no dice (but MOS said to take it to PDV and make it look undercover sans his knowledge) and this was an elaborate set-up with Joran ahead of time knowing his role to get off the hook (he said he wasn't mad at Patrick) , make Patrick $ (book deal and perhaps $$$ from Paulus income stream) and pacify the Americans so Aruba could get back to business, no harm no foul
no one is that evil are they?

I have no facts just unease over all this, I think Patrick & Peter are good guys...so far


Morning Castaglance! Where do the pacified Americans come in? I haven't been pacified yet.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 06, 2008, 12:21:13 PM
Self edit: There are FOUR scenarios:

I thought you were just being artistic, lol!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: caesu on March 06, 2008, 12:23:22 PM
I used to be a trusting, optimistic, naive american
and am not much for speculation but, what if....
When Patrick went to the authorities before Peter (I read that here right?) about Joran and we heard he was told no dice (but MOS said to take it to PDV and make it look undercover sans his knowledge) and this was an elaborate set-up with Joran ahead of time knowing his role to get off the hook (he said he wasn't mad at Patrick) , make Patrick $ (book deal and perhaps $$$ from Paulus income stream) and pacify the Americans so Aruba could get back to business, no harm no foul
no one is that evil are they?

I have no facts just unease over all this, I think Patrick & Peter are good guys...so far

Patrick went to dutch authorities, but they didn't not pass this on to Mos.
because Patrick 'made some demands' the dutch authorities couldn't work with.
dutch justice minister said errors were made in not passing Patrick on to aruban authorities.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Destiny on March 06, 2008, 12:24:48 PM
- maybe he meant he knew the case for years (instead of knowing Joran for years)....was familiar with it?
- Patrick probably tried to set up Joran himself and asked / paid a lot of people for help including police?
- the trap thing: there are some dots there also...so probably someone else involved too in that question?
- Patrick seems to know a bit more than he's letting on ;-)

This is all a bit weird....this case is  just getting more complicated...hopefully the full tape will be aired tonight and translated soon. And hopefully some reactions by Patrick / Peter R. de Vries in the Dutch media tonight!



What about the 2,000 euros, what does that mean?

Probably that Urine needed some gambling money...would say anything to obtain if from Peter....JMOO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Castaglance on March 06, 2008, 12:25:11 PM
I used to be a trusting, optimistic, naive american
and am not much for speculation but, what if....
When Patrick went to the authorities before Peter (I read that here right?) about Joran and we heard he was told no dice (but MOS said to take it to PDV and make it look undercover sans his knowledge) and this was an elaborate set-up with Joran ahead of time knowing his role to get off the hook (he said he wasn't mad at Patrick) , make Patrick $ (book deal and perhaps $$$ from Paulus income stream) and pacify the Americans so Aruba could get back to business, no harm no foul
no one is that evil are they?

I have no facts just unease over all this, I think Patrick & Peter are good guys...so far


Morning Castaglance! Where do the pacified Americans come in? I haven't been pacified yet.
Good morning... that's an oxymoron referring to this, I'm with you.  First we want Natalee back, answers would be a bonus.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 06, 2008, 12:25:32 PM
I have always thought that there would be ample opportunity to secret record Joran outside of the car. When the tape came out I believe Peter mentioned that the car was the place that Joran felt safe and would open up. Well, I can imagine a house would be far easier to setup than a car in terms of place to hide gear and that dicsussions between them would be no different whether they occured in a car or a home.

I always thought that comment from Peter was odd.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 06, 2008, 12:26:16 PM

Let's assume the worst, that Joran told Patrick who "disposed" of the body, this would have occured after the car taping and the "Daury" comment and that Patrick was going to use this information to bribe the VDS' and become a millionaire. If all this were true why would Patrick open his mouth to some interviewer he just met and say "I know who threw her in the ocean?" That would be stupid and doesn't make sense in this scenario, which means that another scenario is likely unfolding.

If he does know, I believe he is holding back that name in accordance with "some kind" of investigation going on here.


That's is what I am getting, a whole nother investigation but who is behind it besides Patrick I cannot figure.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Castaglance on March 06, 2008, 12:27:13 PM
I used to be a trusting, optimistic, naive american
and am not much for speculation but, what if....
When Patrick went to the authorities before Peter (I read that here right?) about Joran and we heard he was told no dice (but MOS said to take it to PDV and make it look undercover sans his knowledge) and this was an elaborate set-up with Joran ahead of time knowing his role to get off the hook (he said he wasn't mad at Patrick) , make Patrick $ (book deal and perhaps $$$ from Paulus income stream) and pacify the Americans so Aruba could get back to business, no harm no foul
no one is that evil are they?

I have no facts just unease over all this, I think Patrick & Peter are good guys...so far

Patrick went to dutch authorities, but they didn't not pass this on to Mos.
because Patrick 'made some demands' the dutch authorities couldn't work with.
dutch justice minister said errors were made in not passing Patrick on to aruban authorities.


thank you for the information... we have to keep questioning (even the "good guys")


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: caesu on March 06, 2008, 12:28:56 PM
i wonder how high the chances are Bram Mosko is doing the civil case now.
yesterday it was 90% chance.

but if all this Patrick stuff is true, he could also sue Patrick for shock damage.

Beth is getting therapy already Bram said yesterday.

also wonder if Beth is still in the netherlands, i hope she is back home.
few days ago they all sat on that sofa.
(http://i28.tinypic.com/2mruqfd.png)

again, i'll wait for peter r. response to this to make an opinion on this news.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Destiny on March 06, 2008, 12:31:40 PM
"joran gave patrick 2000 euro.
so patrick wouldn't say the name of the person how dumped her in the ocean.
patrick knows the name of this person."

http://www.nu.nl/news/1467475/10/Van_der_Eem_beweert_Joran_al_jaren_te_kennen.html


So now it's Joran paying Patrick?  ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyConfused::

I don't think so....not the way *they* operate...Patrick would just be made dead...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: jackb on March 06, 2008, 12:32:39 PM
We saw how Mos promised the poor pimps he would release them as suspects by December 31st because it wasn't fair to be a suspect so long which he did. Well what about the victims,is it fair to be a victim for almost 3 years and not be told anything? Whats the big deal,since all the Suspects,Spokespeople and ATA have looked through the files? Are they still protecting the Van Der Sloots privacy like they did searching there property? Is that only there business that they raped and murdered the Holloways Daughter? What about his promise to JQK that he would be able to look at the Dossier? Mos said he has 24 Detectives on the case right now,What the hell are they doing? What have they investigated the last month? What did the 40 Detectives do in Nov/Dec 07?

This Island needs to be boycotted in the worst way since they have no intention on releasing the truth or prosecuting anyone. It's not just Joran Van Der Sloot who needs to be sued for every single cent he could earn in the next 70 years off of Natalee,but Aruba for what they did to this tourist and her Family.

I agree.  Where's a good volcano when you need it? 

Am I supposed to say "naner, naner, naner, I waas fiiiirst?"  Was on page10.LOL  This page is so funny starting with the ones after mine.  I have been laughing.  You all are sooo funny.   I need to feel there is something funny in this world.  Yeah, where is a good volcano when you need one.  Every one of them so far is funny.       jackb


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 06, 2008, 12:33:31 PM

Let's assume the worst, that Joran told Patrick who "disposed" of the body, this would have occured after the car taping and the "Daury" comment and that Patrick was going to use this information to bribe the VDS' and become a millionaire. If all this were true why would Patrick open his mouth to some interviewer he just met and say "I know who threw her in the ocean?" That would be stupid and doesn't make sense in this scenario, which means that another scenario is likely unfolding.

If he does know, I believe he is holding back that name in accordance with "some kind" of investigation going on here.


That's is what I am getting, a whole nother investigation but who is behind it besides Patrick I cannot figure.

After piecing this together based on the limited information we haveit seems that another investigation is taking place. At this point, until we hear more, it is the most logical conclusion. It still doesn't explain why Patrick would leak such info to the Aruban interviewer.

The way this all is coming out does not fit into any of the scenarios very well.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Destiny on March 06, 2008, 12:34:47 PM
"joran gave patrick 2000 euro.
so patrick wouldn't say the name of the person how dumped her in the ocean.
patrick knows the name of this person."

http://www.nu.nl/news/1467475/10/Van_der_Eem_beweert_Joran_al_jaren_te_kennen.html

ohhhh...

I hope Patrick makes that name known instantly so it can be investigated. And why the heck is he sitting there next to Beth and holding that info from her...

I better shut up about Patrick

I think Patrick is trying to *make* solve the whole case to collect the reward....hence the *I'll be a millionaire* quote from the secret tape....JMOO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 06, 2008, 12:36:37 PM
i wonder how high the chances are Bram Mosko is doing the civil case now.
yesterday it was 90% chance.

but if all this Patrick stuff is true, he could also sue Patrick for shock damage.

Beth is getting therapy already Bram said yesterday.

also wonder if Beth is still in the netherlands, i hope she is back home.
few days ago they all sat on that sofa.
(http://i28.tinypic.com/2mruqfd.png)

again, i'll wait for peter r. response to this to make an opinion on this news.


If what is true?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on March 06, 2008, 12:37:34 PM
Didn't the taping happen after Mos was bellowing for Patrick and not before?

I am not ready to throw Patrick under the bus yet.  I'll wait until things are clearer and then decide.  If he does need to be thrown under the bus, I'm driving!

We will all just have to wait together, we've done it before.  Each time we get a little closer to the truth.

(http://i78.photobucket.com/albums/j120/Bearlyhere/br-38011.jpg)


Waiting. We're good at that. Morning Bearly!

Morning!
   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 06, 2008, 12:38:12 PM

So now it's Joran paying Patrick?  ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyConfused::

I don't think so....not the way *they* operate...Patrick would just be made dead...

 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: Ain't it so!




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: jackb on March 06, 2008, 12:39:42 PM
GBMW -- van der Stratten and Jacobs have to be top of the list...those first few days.

This avatar reminds me of the old saying:  "talk to my azz; I'm listening."
It seems that when I see this, someone is trying to say something.  It is a pretty azz, but a bit distracting.  LOL


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Peaches on March 06, 2008, 12:40:41 PM
"joran gave patrick 2000 euro.
so patrick wouldn't say the name of the person how dumped her in the ocean.
patrick knows the name of this person."

http://www.nu.nl/news/1467475/10/Van_der_Eem_beweert_Joran_al_jaren_te_kennen.html

Excuse me for not getting out much but how much is 2000 euro in USD? 
It doesn't sound like very much to keep someone quiet.
TY


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 06, 2008, 12:40:57 PM

That's is what I am getting, a whole nother investigation but who is behind it besides Patrick I cannot figure.

After piecing this together based on the limited information we haveit seems that another investigation is taking place. At this point, until we hear more, it is the most logical conclusion. It still doesn't explain why Patrick would leak such info to the Aruban interviewer.

The way this all is coming out does not fit into any of the scenarios very well.


All of a sudden the silence is deafening.  ::MonkeyLaugh:: I want to hear from DeVries.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on March 06, 2008, 12:41:50 PM
Sorry if this has been posted, I have a million things going on at once here.

Holloway guests fail to inspire talk show

Holloway guests fail to inspire talk show
Thursday 06 March 2008

Despite extensive publicity, Wednesday night’s Jensen television talk show delivered no new information in the affair surrounding the disappearance of US teenager Natalee Holloway.

Presenter Robert Jensen boasted repeatedly how amazing it was that four key players in the case were guests on the show but the content of their discussions were tame.

Holloway’s mother repeated several times that her co-guests - crime reporter Peter R de Vries and his accomplice Patrick van der Eem - were her ‘heroes’ for getting Joran van der Sloot to confess that that he had been with Natalee when she died.

The fourth guest, lawyer Bram Moszkowicz, appeared for no more than a few minutes to tell the audience he would be back next week.

The only exciting moment was when Jensen called Van der Sloot on Eem’s mobile phone - but the key player in the affair hung up on him.
http://www.dutchnews.nl/news/archives/2008/03/holloway_guests_fail_to_inspir.php


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 06, 2008, 12:42:07 PM
"joran gave patrick 2000 euro.
so patrick wouldn't say the name of the person how dumped her in the ocean.
patrick knows the name of this person."

http://www.nu.nl/news/1467475/10/Van_der_Eem_beweert_Joran_al_jaren_te_kennen.html

Excuse me for not getting out much but how much is 2000 euro in USD? 
It doesn't sound like very much to keep someone quiet.
TY



Ain't much of squat. What, maybe 4,000 dollars if they were trading 2 to 1?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: caesu on March 06, 2008, 12:42:27 PM
i wonder how high the chances are Bram Mosko is doing the civil case now.
yesterday it was 90% chance.

but if all this Patrick stuff is true, he could also sue Patrick for shock damage.

Beth is getting therapy already Bram said yesterday.

also wonder if Beth is still in the netherlands, i hope she is back home.
few days ago they all sat on that sofa.
(http://i28.tinypic.com/2mruqfd.png)

again, i'll wait for peter r. response to this to make an opinion on this news.


If what is true?

that patrick knows who threw natalee in the ocean and got money from joran to stay silent about that.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Dawntreader on March 06, 2008, 12:42:50 PM
Good Morning to you, Monkeys! I have to admit all of this about Patrick has taken me by surprise. Would love some kind of reaction from Peter.

Now, about the tennis shoe/s....
Who is the one bringing up the tennis shoes all the time?  Joran?
Who was the first to describe the shoes? Joran?
Who seems to lie all of the time? Could it be Joran?
Why would I think he was ever wearing KSwiss tennis shoes on the beach? Because Joran said so?
He was probably wearing flipflops or something else. JMO.  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 06, 2008, 12:44:42 PM
Sorry if this has been posted, I have a million things going on at once here.

Holloway guests fail to inspire talk show

Holloway guests fail to inspire talk show
Thursday 06 March 2008

Despite extensive publicity, Wednesday night’s Jensen television talk show delivered no new information in the affair surrounding the disappearance of US teenager Natalee Holloway.

Presenter Robert Jensen boasted repeatedly how amazing it was that four key players in the case were guests on the show but the content of their discussions were tame.

Holloway’s mother repeated several times that her co-guests - crime reporter Peter R de Vries and his accomplice Patrick van der Eem - were her ‘heroes’ for getting Joran van der Sloot to confess that that he had been with Natalee when she died.

The fourth guest, lawyer Bram Moszkowicz, appeared for no more than a few minutes to tell the audience he would be back next week.

The only exciting moment was when Jensen called Van der Sloot on Eem’s mobile phone - but the key player in the affair hung up on him.
http://www.dutchnews.nl/news/archives/2008/03/holloway_guests_fail_to_inspir.php


WTF, do they want them to get up there and do cartwheels and other stupid human tricks!  Geeeeze!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 06, 2008, 12:44:47 PM
TODAY'S EXCHANGE RATE: 1 Euro = 1.5201 U.S. dollars



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: jackb on March 06, 2008, 12:45:15 PM
oh and PS...

I am so disappointed... ::MonkeyNoNo::

(http://i195.photobucket.com/albums/z215/kickradio/harryking.jpg)

I went out and bought NEW SUSPENDERS...

and nobody...but not notbody even noticed:

(http://i195.photobucket.com/albums/z215/kickradio/harryking2.gif)

Just goes to show everybody loves my loveable face and forgets about the rest of me...LOL  ::MonkeyTongue:: ::MonkeyHaHa::
  You a ugly monkey.  But as long as you is a monkey, that be(s) ok.     jackb


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 06, 2008, 12:46:12 PM

that patrick knows who threw natalee in the ocean and got money from joran to stay silent about that.


That would be bribery on Joran's part, another offense to contend with.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Peaches on March 06, 2008, 12:46:41 PM
I have always thought that there would be ample opportunity to secret record Joran outside of the car. When the tape came out I believe Peter mentioned that the car was the place that Joran felt safe and would open up. Well, I can imagine a house would be far easier to setup than a car in terms of place to hide gear and that dicsussions between them would be no different whether they occured in a car or a home.

I always thought that comment from Peter was odd.

I believe his contention was that someone would expect to be bugged in a restaurant or home but not in a vehicle. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Destiny on March 06, 2008, 12:47:40 PM
How do you think Paulus' composure is these days?

(1) Scared, knowing that it may be a matter of time before the game is over...

OR

(2) Calm, cool, and collected knowing that nothing will happen in the end...

On a side note....he could be *binding* his feet is he wears a size 14 Kswiss ;-)....LOL


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: jackb on March 06, 2008, 12:48:21 PM
FRAMING is not a word, I believe Patrick had in mind for Joran.  Tricking him into a confession of truth as to what happened would be what, in my estimation he was doing.  Whoever used the word FRAMING is either using the wrong word or they are trying to FRAME Patrick.     Jack blue

perhaps more like putting him in the frame...gotta be one those translation problems!

Why is the picture (avatar) showing its azz?   jackblue

She is applying for a job as a refrigerator repairman(person)?

it's a man ray photo, and i liked it.

Now for the next question (or at least my next question):

"I do not photograph nature. I photograph my visions."

Man Ray, the master of experimental and fashion photography was also a painter, a filmmaker, a poet, an essayist, a philosopher, and a leader of American modernism. Known for documenting the cultural elite living in France, Man Ray spent much of his time fighting the formal constraints of the visual arts. Ray’s life and art were always provocative, engaging, and challenging.

<snip>

He died on November 18, 1976 at the age of eighty-six. One the great artists and agitators of his time, Man Ray will be remembered not simply for the fascinating and experimental works he left behind, but for the crucial role he played in encouraging the revolutionary in art.

Man Ray: Prophet of the Avant-Garde 
 
http://www.pbs.org/wnet/americanmasters/database/ray_m.html

I love being a monkey, I learn something new every day!

Some have visions of lilipops dancing; so I suppose some have visions of azzes prancing.  I don't put a lot of stock in things showing their azzes, but to each their own???   LOL  jackb


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on March 06, 2008, 12:49:10 PM
i wonder how high the chances are Bram Mosko is doing the civil case now.
yesterday it was 90% chance.

but if all this Patrick stuff is true, he could also sue Patrick for shock damage.

Beth is getting therapy already Bram said yesterday.

also wonder if Beth is still in the netherlands, i hope she is back home.
few days ago they all sat on that sofa.
(http://i28.tinypic.com/2mruqfd.png)

again, i'll wait for peter r. response to this to make an opinion on this news.


If what is true?

that patrick knows who threw natalee in the ocean and got money from joran to stay silent about that.

If it is true what would you bet that Joran will try to sue Patrick for breach of contract!   ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Rob on March 06, 2008, 12:49:54 PM
"joran gave patrick 2000 euro.
so patrick wouldn't say the name of the person how dumped her in the ocean.
patrick knows the name of this person."

http://www.nu.nl/news/1467475/10/Van_der_Eem_beweert_Joran_al_jaren_te_kennen.html

Excuse me for not getting out much but how much is 2000 euro in USD? 
It doesn't sound like very much to keep someone quiet.
TY



Ain't much of squat. What, maybe 4,000 dollars if they were trading 2 to 1?

I believe the Euro closed at an all time high against the dollar on Tuesday 1 to 1.5


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Flipper/Donnie29 on March 06, 2008, 12:51:21 PM
Hi All,

I was just looking at a program on television, and there was news about Patrick van der Eem.. he was an Aruban tv/radio last week, as everyone allready knew.. but the interviewer let another camera run and stopped the main one, so Patrick thought all cams were out. He was asked about the boat etc, and Patrick answered that he knows the name of the one that drove the boat..

Here is a link.. its in Dutch though: http://www.dakzoekje.nl/2008/03/patrick-van-der-eem-doet-pikante-uitspraken-in-verborgen-video-filmpje/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: klaasend on March 06, 2008, 12:52:03 PM
Posted on the front page of SM:

FL wrote:

#9 Katablog:
In short:

Patrick van der Eem, like Joran, was also filmed secretly.

After an interview witrh a local TV station Patrick said a few interesting things.

“I know who disposed the body of NH” said Patrick in Papiamento to the Aruban interviewer. “Joran asked me 2000 Euros to keep this man quiet” after the interview.

Patrick claimed this operation was his idea. I planned everything with the hidden mics and plants. Hidden mics in plants and even tapping the internet connection.

Patrick thinks he’ll become a millionair with his book. “I will make sure this whole family of Joran will fall very hard”. They can better move to Africa.

The interview took place at the end of February afer the book Patrick wrote with an American reporter. The reporter of “Un Dia Den Bida” said”I had two cameras. After the interview I switched off one camera, but not the other one. Patrick did not know this but still ansered my questions”.

The interview will be on air this evening on the Aruban TV. Patrick is back in the netherlands and was not available for an interview.

A Dutch magazine (Revu) translated the movies as seen on YouTube with an transcript. The most important parts in bold.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Rob on March 06, 2008, 12:52:44 PM
Hi All,

I was just looking at a program on television, and there was news about Patrick van der Eem.. he was an Aruban tv/radio last week, as everyone allready knew.. but the interviewer let another camera run and stopped the main one, so Patrick thought all cams were out. He was asked about the boat etc, and Patrick answered that he knows the name of the one that drove the boat..

Here is a link.. its in Dutch though: http://www.dakzoekje.nl/2008/03/patrick-van-der-eem-doet-pikante-uitspraken-in-verborgen-video-filmpje/

Flipper, so it was the TeleAruba broadcast?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Peaches on March 06, 2008, 12:53:57 PM
For jackb....somebody say dancing donkey?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LQ764QZo5N4

 ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Destiny on March 06, 2008, 12:54:31 PM
Still catching up from about 3 threads ago... but I haven't seen the point made yet...

1. The Persistence cannot remain in an area where there is a threat of impending hostilities.

2. The Vice-President of the United States does not often travel to Aruba, nor does he travel anywhere unless there are matters of great importance to be resolved.

What may be about to happen down there in Aruba and Venezuela is just what we have been hoping for... that retribution comes from a different quarter than where we think.

I'll take *KARMA* flakes...with, or without milk...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 06, 2008, 12:55:07 PM
i wonder how high the chances are Bram Mosko is doing the civil case now.
yesterday it was 90% chance.

but if all this Patrick stuff is true, he could also sue Patrick for shock damage.

Beth is getting therapy already Bram said yesterday.

also wonder if Beth is still in the netherlands, i hope she is back home.
few days ago they all sat on that sofa.
(http://i28.tinypic.com/2mruqfd.png)

again, i'll wait for peter r. response to this to make an opinion on this news.


If what is true?

that patrick knows who threw natalee in the ocean and got money from joran to stay silent about that.

Again, that scenario just does not make sense. If you got money from someone to keep quiet about a murder you don't go talking about it to someone you just met, let alone, a reporter. I guess we will have to wait for part #2 to come out to make sense of this.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: kkate on March 06, 2008, 12:55:21 PM
Live rates at 2008.03.06 17:52:30 UTC  
2,000.00 EUR = 3,073.42 USD
Euro    United States Dollars  
1 EUR = 1.53671 USD   1 USD = 0.650742 EUR


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: katrien on March 06, 2008, 12:55:55 PM
Peter R is in RTL Boulevard at the moment and he told that both Joran and Patrick said that they knew eachother for 7 months. ::MonkeyHaHa::

Peter says it's all nonsense.


One of the writers of the piece was Stan the Jong so I expected something like this already.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: GBMW on March 06, 2008, 12:57:14 PM
Peter R. de Vries was just on RTL Boulevard!

* Joran & Patrick only know each other a couple of months and NOT for years. (Peter also mentions this is also confirmed by Joran).
* Patrick doesn't know who 'dumped the body'; but he has his ideas...the translation is probably misinterpreted. That's probably what happened with the interview a lot of times.

In general Peter R. de Vries wasn't panicked / worried or shocked in any way. They didn't ask anything about the 2000 Euros/ brothers (Kalpoe?) / the set up with microphones...just a couple of questions about how long they knew each other and who dumped the body.

Peter did say he doesn't understand Papiamento so it's difficult for him to really know what has been said.....I think he heard about it; checked the script and called Patrick.

Hopefully more info in other shows later on!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: dennisintn on March 06, 2008, 12:57:58 PM

What about the 2,000 euros, what does that mean?

the way i understood it: joran asked patrick for 2000 euros to give to the guy who helped him dump the body
Buying silence


Greetings JE. Raises the question as to whether Patrick paid the actual dumper or Joran was trying to bilk him.

Hey dayhiker i am wondering where de Telegraaf got this info from it is not in the transcript This gets weirder all the time

i miss a lot with these translations, but i got the idea that this information came from the "hidden camera" stunt arubatv played on patrick.  i guess we'll find out tonight about that.
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: jackb on March 06, 2008, 12:58:09 PM
interesting reading to get the whole police chief replacement problem understood.
david dick is of course also justice minister for bonaire.

if the justice minister of the antilles is going down this is a huge scandal.


Mercelina said there was a situation in Bonaire similar to that in St. Maarten. The Netherlands will not extend the contract of Police Chief Commissioner Johan van der Straten and NAPB believes that again a Dutch replacement will be appointed.


http://www.thedailyherald.com/news/daily/k222/blow222.html

jan = short for johan
  So, that johan is pronounced YO han (is dirty.)  So we have a Dirtyhand....wonder if it isthe Dirty Hand? Someone knew his first name and may have dubbed him that.  He needs to be arrested for slandering the populace of Aruba and helping to cause a worse financial disaster than a major explosion in the region.  He needs to be placed in a cell where he can paint and photograph mocking images of the prison.  He is a terrorist to his own country and those who are trying to live the right way.    Jack b


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Flipper/Donnie29 on March 06, 2008, 01:01:22 PM
Hi All,

I was just looking at a program on television, and there was news about Patrick van der Eem.. he was an Aruban tv/radio last week, as everyone allready knew.. but the interviewer let another camera run and stopped the main one, so Patrick thought all cams were out. He was asked about the boat etc, and Patrick answered that he knows the name of the one that drove the boat..

Here is a link.. its in Dutch though: http://www.dakzoekje.nl/2008/03/patrick-van-der-eem-doet-pikante-uitspraken-in-verborgen-video-filmpje/

Flipper, so it was the TeleAruba broadcast?

Yep it will be broadcasted tonight..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: ala_gunslinger on March 06, 2008, 01:03:09 PM
Hey ya'll!

I must say, this is getting very interesting....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: jackb on March 06, 2008, 01:07:19 PM
I have been doing a little scholarly research you could say and came across this very insightful journal article. I don't know if many of you have read this or seen it before but I present it here in its entirety:


Title: A Media Circus in Paradise. By: Wolfson, Hannah, American Journalism Review, 10678654, Aug/Sep2005, Vol. 27, Issue 4
Database: Communication & Mass Media CompleteA Media Circus in Paradise
Contents
The Distressed Treatment
Section: DROP CAP
LETTER FROM ARUBA

An Alabama reporter discovers the press doesn't quite shine in the Caribbean sun

It's the first news conference, and the police superintendent can't find the keys. But no one's told TV. One by one, the camera crews push closer, reporters from CNN and Fox News squeezing onto the narrow sidewalk between a line of parked cars and the locked door of the police annex. Jan van der Straaten, the man in charge of Aruba's investigation into Natalee Holloway's disappearance, is stuck, and soon he's sweating in the Caribbean sun.

A few locals slow down as they drive by to see what's happening while uniformed officers smirk outside the main police station across the street. Finally the door opens and everyone tumbles inside, following van der Straaten up a narrow stairway.

Welcome to the media circus, Aruba style.

OK, I'm just a novice, a print reporter from Alabama covering what started out as a hometown story about a missing teen and mushroomed into nonstop national news. Maybe the crews that converge on events like the Michael Jackson trial and the Runaway Bride are always like this. Maybe it was just the bright tropical light and the strangeness of working in paradise that made things look so absurd. All I know is, after nine days in Aruba, I see what we in the media do--and I say we with great trepidation--in a whole new light.

In fact, looking at it from the Arubans' perspective, I'm a little confused about what we do. Most of the job seems to consist of waiting around in hotel lobbies and seeing who can shout the loudest at news conferences.

There were certainly plenty of us crammed into those daily sessions in the peaked attic room of the police annex. There were a handful of local teams from Birmingham and international crews shipped from Latin America. Then came the bookers and the producers, vying for exclusives with the cloistered mother. Then the shows with dramatic theme music, in crews as large as five. And of course, the Aruban print and radio reporters, who quickly became everyone's favorite sources of speculation.
In the early days, there was plenty to cover. The Royal Dutch Marines searched the beaches while helicopters scanned overhead. Hundreds of locals were herded onto tour buses to help with the hunt. Sources were willing to talk, suspects were arrested, and officials gave tempting hints like, "Hold your breath for 24 hours."   The networks sent their satellites and set them up on the roofs of hotels, settling in for the long haul.

Then things started to get weird.

First, CNN ran a report on the island's crack dens and prostitution. Local tourism authorities were outraged. So were a couple of the local reporters, who accused the American press of sabotaging Aruba's economy. By the end of week two, it seemed half of each news conference was dedicated to berating the American press. Even the family's PR agent, who originally represented the tourism authority, was accused of a conflict of interest.

We Americans didn't do ourselves proud, either. Fed up with officials' choice to conduct the first half of each news conference in Papiamento, the local language, some crews took to shouting "English, English!" during the Q-and-A.

Along with Papiamento, Arubans speak English, Spanish and Dutch, but their legal system caused tricky translations. When the first two suspects were arrested (they were later released), the chief prosecutor said they'd been charged with a range of crimes, including murder. A day later, we found ourselves redefining the meaning of "charged" to say first "formally accused" and later "suspected." It turns out they can hold suspects for months without charging them. On July 1, more than a month after Holloway disappeared, the Associated Press had to clarify a story in which the same prosecutor was again quoted as saying three suspects had been charged.

Some of the mistakes were harder to explain. Late one Friday night, CNN reported that at least one of the suspects had confessed. AP quickly followed with a report that he was leading police to the evidence. Moments later, a half dozen news crews sped down a pitch-dark dirt road toward an abandoned beach where police were supposedly digging up a body. Nothing. Officials ranging from the original source right up to the prime minister quickly denied the initial reports.

As guiltily competitive as the rest, I crept out later that night with a Birmingham television crew that was filming distant, spotty footage of men digging in the dunes--probably just local bootleggers pulling up their stash of booze.

Theories abound as to why the media became obsessed with Natalee Holloway's story. It involved a beautiful, blond honor student with influential parents; it occurred in an exotic locale; it started while the jury was out on Jacko. Granted, much of the interest back home stemmed from honest concern about a family's loss. Natalee's mother, Beth Twitty, insisted her daughter represented something perfect and innocent that was lost, a fear that touches the heart of any parent. The outpourings of support in Natalee's hometown and on the island were real, even if they were on camera.

But it also seems the sheer lack of information also spurred the story, because it left plenty of room for speculation, especially as the case progressed. (Aruban officials said releasing details of the investigation could cause a judge to throw out their case.)   Natalee had been sold into white slavery, the blogs said. Natalee had run away on a previous trip abroad, Aruban radio countered. Fellow graduates who were on the trip refused to talk: conspiracy! The lead suspect's dad is a judge: conspiracy! My favorite theory came from Aruban reporters who thought police staged the false leak about a confession to discredit American news sources.
Back home in the newsroom, I continued reporting the story by phone as my Aruba tan faded, trying to confirm information as it flashed on TV. Again and again, I heard sources on the other end sigh and say, "No, that's not right."   I watched the same television personality who "broke" the news about bloodstains in a suspect's car--which turned out not to be bloodstains--criticize authorities for taking Holloway's family on an emotional rollercoaster. But who's really driving?

The Distressed Treatment
"A damsel must be white. This requirement is nonnegotiable. It helps if her frame is of dimensions that breathless cable television reporters can credibly describe as 'petite.'… She must be attractive--also nonnegotiable. Her economic status should be middle class or higher, but an exception can be made in the case of wartime (see: [Jessica] Lynch).

"Put all this together, and you get 24-7 coverage."

--Washington Post columnist Eugene
Robinson, writing on the media's
and the nation's obsession with
white damsels in distress

PHOTO (COLOR): One tiny piece of the media circus: A U.S. television news crew interviews Beth Twitty (center), mother of missing teen Natalee Holloway, in Oranjestad, Aruba. (In the background on this page is a poster released by the Holloway family.)

~~~~~~~~

By Hannah Wolfson


Wolfson covers the city of Mountain Brook, Alabama, Holloway's hometown, for the Birmingham News.



I forgot to highlight some key parts of this article.
A DAMSAL MUST BE WHITE:  Seems the requirement to get her killed, that is along with being an American tourist.  You people down there amaze me.  You let these far leftist people come in and take over your communications, ie., your life and when it gets unbearable you first blame it on the US, then call on us to come rescue you after you finally see what the problem is.  It is getting so, that we are getting tired of rescuing people who turn on us.  If you want second class, and choose it, then don't try to get us to take you on after you have been turned into slime.  We cannot use you after you have become so dirty.  Stand tall and be who you are supposed to be and prove you deserve the help from the US.      jackb


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Peaches on March 06, 2008, 01:11:37 PM
OT  - Gotta run out for a chest CT... pray for me.

I am so impressed by all of our new Dutch friends.  Keeping up with the news is SO much easier now.  Thanks.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: ala_gunslinger on March 06, 2008, 01:15:41 PM
OT  - Gotta run out for a chest CT... pray for me.

I am so impressed by all of our new Dutch friends.  Keeping up with the news is SO much easier now.  Thanks.

Of course we will Peaches!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Tater on March 06, 2008, 01:16:03 PM
OT  - Gotta run out for a chest CT... pray for me.

I am so impressed by all of our new Dutch friends.  Keeping up with the news is SO much easier now.  Thanks.


Always praying for you Peaches,always...Big Hugs


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: jackb on March 06, 2008, 01:17:00 PM
BREAKING NEWS
[/b][/color]

http://www.telegraaf.nl/binnenland/3487159/__Ik_weet_wie_Natalee_in_zee_gooide___.html

http://www.revu.nl/10865.Ook_Van_der_Eem_stiekem_gefilmd

"I know who dumped Natalee in the sea"

about the secret taping of Patrick on Telearuba program.


"I know who Natalee threw into the sea '
By our reporters
ORANJESTAD (Aruba) - Patrick van der Eem, Joran van der Sloot for hidden cameras in the fall attracted demonstrated himself to be filmed secretly.
   
 

After an interview on Aruba with a local television station showed Van der Eem a number of spicy statements ontlokken, because he thought that cameras had been stopped.

"I know who the body is thrown into the sea," says Van der Eem in Papiaments against the Aruban interviewer. "Joran asked me to 2000 euro for that man to be silent," said van der Eem during the secretly recorded discussion.

The undercover criminal claims that he has the whole operation itself organized. "I have even invented everything, how the environment had to be equipped with microphones and plants. From minicameraatjes hidden in plants to even the Internet and telephone that were drained. "

Van der Eem also says that he expects to be a millionaire by the whole thing. "And I will make sure that Joran and his entire family in their mouth. They can better emigrate to Africa, "Van der Eem threatening.

The interview took place at the end of last month in response to the book that Van der Eem by an American journalist late. The interviewer from the station Un Dia Den Bida face of this newspaper: "I had two cameras included. After the interview I had an off and the other doordraaien. Van der Eem knew that not only was it simply answer my questions. "

The complete interview will be broadcast tonight on the Aruban television. Patrick van der Eem is now back in the Netherlands yesterday and was not reachable for comment.

Nieuwe Revu Meanwhile showed the filpmjes translate. The transcription of the document can be found here. The key passages are shown in bold.

So did Patrick say that Joran asked him for $2000 euros to pay off the person that helped him dispose of the body? This is confusing! Does it also say that he was going to record that transfer of money with hidden microphones?
  NO:  It is saying Joran gave the body thrower 2000 Euros to keep quiet.
They are trying to slander the work of Peter D. and Patrick.  The perps, as usual and their leftist cohorts are trying to confuse the issue.  Go with what you got.  The video confessions.  Concentrate on those only.  Patrick is no fool.  He would not say anything to anyone he does not want repeated on or off camera.  I believe this.   Jack b


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on March 06, 2008, 01:19:42 PM
Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 12:59 pm    BY Glenda at RU

According to those that have seen the full 20 minutes... Patrick says that even the Police made money...

We have to wait until tonight to see if that indeed was said or just someone's interpretation. 

~~~~~~~~~Can we please get the AVY's shut off? It is taking me 3 minutes or more to load a page and I am on high speed.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on March 06, 2008, 01:21:26 PM
OT  - Gotta run out for a chest CT... pray for me.

I am so impressed by all of our new Dutch friends.  Keeping up with the news is SO much easier now.  Thanks.

Prayers are on the way.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 06, 2008, 01:21:26 PM
I guess we will have to wait and see what EXACTLY Patrick says in the video.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: snoopy on March 06, 2008, 01:23:38 PM
OT  - Gotta run out for a chest CT... pray for me.

I am so impressed by all of our new Dutch friends.  Keeping up with the news is SO much easier now.  Thanks.

Absolutely!!  Always in my prayers Peaches.  {{{{{HUGS}}}}}


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on March 06, 2008, 01:29:03 PM
BY JOS at BFN

summary>>

Patrick claims to be friends with Joran for years.

patrick says he knows who dumped Natalee's body in the sea. Joran supposedly has paid him to keep his mouth shut

Patrick made those remarks on Aruba TV. He thought the camera's were out.

One of the camera was still rolling. His remarks are translated by a translating company at request of magazine De Nieuwe revu.

"Since i know Joran for years...". This is in contradiction what he said before.

Patrick say he intends to continue to bother the VDS family with the knowledge he has.

One day Joran will fall on his face. You don't know what the other family membets are doing. I will make them bitter.
 
Peter's show offered new openings but the judge decided Joran could not be arrested for fantasy telling.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 06, 2008, 01:30:20 PM
Sorry if this has been posted, I have a million things going on at once here.

Holloway guests fail to inspire talk show

Holloway guests fail to inspire talk show
Thursday 06 March 2008

Despite extensive publicity, Wednesday night’s Jensen television talk show delivered no new information in the affair surrounding the disappearance of US teenager Natalee Holloway.

Presenter Robert Jensen boasted repeatedly how amazing it was that four key players in the case were guests on the show but the content of their discussions were tame.

Holloway’s mother repeated several times that her co-guests - crime reporter Peter R de Vries and his accomplice Patrick van der Eem - were her ‘heroes’ for getting Joran van der Sloot to confess that that he had been with Natalee when she died.

The fourth guest, lawyer Bram Moszkowicz, appeared for no more than a few minutes to tell the audience he would be back next week.

The only exciting moment was when Jensen called Van der Sloot on Eem’s mobile phone - but the key player in the affair hung up on him.
http://www.dutchnews.nl/news/archives/2008/03/holloway_guests_fail_to_inspir.php


Thanks Nut.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Kimmy53 on March 06, 2008, 01:30:26 PM
OT  - Gotta run out for a chest CT... pray for me.

I am so impressed by all of our new Dutch friends.  Keeping up with the news is SO much easier now.  Thanks.

Prayers for you Peaches!!!!!!!!!!  (((((HUGS)))))


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on March 06, 2008, 01:31:02 PM
www.revu.nl


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Destiny on March 06, 2008, 01:31:26 PM
Hey ya'll!

I must say, this is getting very interesting....

Yep Ala...as Elmer Fudd would say....vewwy vewwy intwesting, you siwwy wabbit ;-)....can you tell my head is spinning too ;-)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Rob on March 06, 2008, 01:31:56 PM
Peaches, I'm thinking of you too.

Hang in there girl.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 06, 2008, 01:33:10 PM
BY JOS at BFN

summary>>

Patrick claims to be friends with Joran for years.

patrick says he knows who dumped Natalee's body in the sea. Joran supposedly has paid him to keep his mouth shut

Patrick made those remarks on Aruba TV. He thought the camera's were out.

One of the camera was still rolling. His remarks are translated by a translating company at request of magazine De Nieuwe revu.

"Since i know Joran for years...". This is in contradiction what he said before.

Patrick say he intends to continue to bother the VDS family with the knowledge he has.

One day Joran will fall on his face. You don't know what the other family membets are doing. I will make them bitter.
 
Peter's show offered new openings but the judge decided Joran could not be arrested for fantasy telling.

Who the heck pad who, that's what I want to know, since there are two translations apparently regarding this "small" detail.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Destiny on March 06, 2008, 01:35:02 PM
OT  - Gotta run out for a chest CT... pray for me.

I am so impressed by all of our new Dutch friends.  Keeping up with the news is SO much easier now.  Thanks.

Prayers for Health...Strength...and Miracles...lighting a white candle for Peaches.....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: jackb on March 06, 2008, 01:35:09 PM
- maybe he meant he knew the case for years (instead of knowing Joran for years)....was familiar with it?
- Patrick probably tried to set up Joran himself and asked / paid a lot of people for help including police?
- the trap thing: there are some dots there also...so probably someone else involved too in that question?
- Patrick seems to know a bit more than he's letting on ;-)

This is all a bit weird....this case is  just getting more complicated...hopefully the full tape will be aired tonight and translated soon. And hopefully some reactions by Patrick / Peter R. de Vries in the Dutch media tonight!





What about the 2,000 euros, what does that mean?

the way i understood it: joran asked patrick for 2000 euros to give to the guy who helped him dump the body
Buying silence

Body disposers would not have a "buy now, pay later plan."  2000 Euros would be a lot to a younger person or to someone who needed it.       j/b


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 06, 2008, 01:37:57 PM
Posted on the front page of SM:

FL wrote:

#9 Katablog:
In short:

Patrick van der Eem, like Joran, was also filmed secretly.

After an interview witrh a local TV station Patrick said a few interesting things.

“I know who disposed the body of NH” said Patrick in Papiamento to the Aruban interviewer. “Joran asked me 2000 Euros to keep this man quiet” after the interview.

Patrick claimed this operation was his idea. I planned everything with the hidden mics and plants. Hidden mics in plants and even tapping the internet connection.

Patrick thinks he’ll become a millionair with his book. “I will make sure this whole family of Joran will fall very hard”. They can better move to Africa.

The interview took place at the end of February afer the book Patrick wrote with an American reporter. The reporter of “Un Dia Den Bida” said”I had two cameras. After the interview I switched off one camera, but not the other one. Patrick did not know this but still ansered my questions”.

The interview will be on air this evening on the Aruban TV. Patrick is back in the netherlands and was not available for an interview.

A Dutch magazine (Revu) translated the movies as seen on YouTube with an transcript. The most important parts in bold.



 ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Anna on March 06, 2008, 01:38:58 PM
Good Afternoon, Monkeys,

Prayers and Hugs for Peaches!!!

Anyone else think Patrick might just be messing with that reporter?  Patrick's own version of a little jokey or two?  I think he suspected he was being taped and decided to take the reporter for a little ride.

Guess we shall see but then as always, we won't be able to understand the Pap in which the program is being broadcast.  Perhaps Peter R will explain on his site in English later?

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: ala_gunslinger on March 06, 2008, 01:43:15 PM
Hey ya'll!

I must say, this is getting very interesting....

Yep Ala...as Elmer Fudd would say....vewwy vewwy intwesting, you siwwy wabbit ;-)....can you tell my head is spinning too ;-)

Yep! 

There's something vewy scewwy going on here!!!

Kill da wabbit!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Anna on March 06, 2008, 01:45:24 PM
Hey ya'll!

I must say, this is getting very interesting....

Yep Ala...as Elmer Fudd would say....vewwy vewwy intwesting, you siwwy wabbit ;-)....can you tell my head is spinning too ;-)

Yep! 

There's something vewy scewwy going on here!!!

Kill da wabbit!


Gunslinger,

That's always good advice!

 ::MonkeyHaHa::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Observer on March 06, 2008, 01:46:10 PM
This is exactly what the other side wants is to not find Patrick credible and have him contradict himself. Also in order for him to sell many copies of his book he will need something juicy inside of it like who he thinks dumped Natalee in the ocean. If he already knows and was told another name besides Daury then he has some explaining to do.MO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: JE on March 06, 2008, 01:49:53 PM
BY JOS at BFN

summary>>

Patrick claims to be friends with Joran for years.

patrick says he knows who dumped Natalee's body in the sea. Joran supposedly has paid him to keep his mouth shut

Patrick made those remarks on Aruba TV. He thought the camera's were out.

One of the camera was still rolling. His remarks are translated by a translating company at request of magazine De Nieuwe revu.

"Since i know Joran for years...". This is in contradiction what he said before.

Patrick say he intends to continue to bother the VDS family with the knowledge he has.

One day Joran will fall on his face. You don't know what the other family membets are doing. I will make them bitter.
 
Peter's show offered new openings but the judge decided Joran could not be arrested for fantasy telling.

Who the heck pad who, that's what I want to know, since there are two translations apparently regarding this "small" detail.

It s not 2 translations. The one paper says it was money to give to the guy who dumped the body. The other says that joran paid patrick to not tell the name.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 06, 2008, 01:53:33 PM
BY JOS at BFN

summary>>

Patrick claims to be friends with Joran for years.

patrick says he knows who dumped Natalee's body in the sea. Joran supposedly has paid him to keep his mouth shut

Patrick made those remarks on Aruba TV. He thought the camera's were out.

One of the camera was still rolling. His remarks are translated by a translating company at request of magazine De Nieuwe revu.

"Since i know Joran for years...". This is in contradiction what he said before.

Patrick say he intends to continue to bother the VDS family with the knowledge he has.

One day Joran will fall on his face. You don't know what the other family membets are doing. I will make them bitter.
 
Peter's show offered new openings but the judge decided Joran could not be arrested for fantasy telling.

Who the heck pad who, that's what I want to know, since there are two translations apparently regarding this "small" detail.

It s not 2 translations. The one paper says it was money to give to the guy who dumped the body. The other says that joran paid patrick to not tell the name.

Ok, you just provided *two* different conclusions that came from Patricks interview. Your saying the translation is correct but that the papers are misinterpreting things? What am I missing here?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: katrien on March 06, 2008, 01:53:57 PM
NO:  It is saying Joran gave the body thrower 2000 Euros to keep quiet.
They are trying to slander the work of Peter D. and Patrick.  The perps, as usual and their leftist cohorts are trying to confuse the issue.  Go with what you got.  The video confessions.  Concentrate on those only.  Patrick is no fool.  He would not say anything to anyone he does not want repeated on or off camera.  I believe this.   Jack b

Exactly. There are two writers. From one of them Stan de Jong I found out he told pertinent lies in the past.
He hates Peter R. Peter R went to court to sue him ones. Stan de Jong obviously lost.

This Stan de Jong wrote last week also an article about Patrick and Peter. The whole article was based on anonymous sources. That's how this man works. He follows Peter R. everywere to see were he can trigger Peter R. If he has to tell lies to blame PeterR, no problem.

I have seen this man working before. If you go against him and his friends, they start to intimidate in a very sneaky way.
Not everybody likes it to be intimidated for having another opinion.
That's the reason I feel I need to tell this. I wrote about it in the last chapter already.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Destiny on March 06, 2008, 01:54:07 PM
This is exactly what the other side wants is to not find Patrick credible and have him contradict himself. Also in order for him to sell many copies of his book he will need something juicy inside of it like who he thinks dumped Natalee in the ocean. If he already knows and was told another name besides Daury then he has some explaining to do.MO

Yep...Lucy...you got some 'splainin to do....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: ala_gunslinger on March 06, 2008, 01:56:37 PM
This is exactly what the other side wants is to not find Patrick credible and have him contradict himself. Also in order for him to sell many copies of his book he will need something juicy inside of it like who he thinks dumped Natalee in the ocean. If he already knows and was told another name besides Daury then he has some explaining to do.MO

I smell a ruse!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 06, 2008, 02:02:02 PM
This is exactly what the other side wants is to not find Patrick credible and have him contradict himself. Also in order for him to sell many copies of his book he will need something juicy inside of it like who he thinks dumped Natalee in the ocean. If he already knows and was told another name besides Daury then he has some explaining to do.MO

Yep...Lucy...you got some 'splainin to do....

If new information comes out that helps solve the case I could give a rats azz about Patrick, I'm indifferent to him in the big scheme of things. I just can't imagine that he would be so stupid as to expose what he knows to this interviewer, even if he was planning on using this knowledge to "spice" up his book.

But maybe he is dumb as rocks and was hiding something, and slipped up trying to impress this guy, who knows.

They can try and deflect the spotlight to him, but it won't matter because we all know where the real stink is coming from.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: JE on March 06, 2008, 02:03:18 PM
BY JOS at BFN

summary>>

Patrick claims to be friends with Joran for years.

patrick says he knows who dumped Natalee's body in the sea. Joran supposedly has paid him to keep his mouth shut

Patrick made those remarks on Aruba TV. He thought the camera's were out.

One of the camera was still rolling. His remarks are translated by a translating company at request of magazine De Nieuwe revu.

"Since i know Joran for years...". This is in contradiction what he said before.

Patrick say he intends to continue to bother the VDS family with the knowledge he has.

One day Joran will fall on his face. You don't know what the other family membets are doing. I will make them bitter.
 
Peter's show offered new openings but the judge decided Joran could not be arrested for fantasy telling.

Who the heck pad who, that's what I want to know, since there are two translations apparently regarding this "small" detail.

It s not 2 translations. The one paper says it was money to give to the guy who dumped the body. The other says that joran paid patrick to not tell the name.

Ok, you just provided *two* different conclusions that came from Patricks interview. Your saying the translation is correct but that the papers are misinterpreting things? What am I missing here?

i m saying there s two versions in the papers. One paper says that the man who dumped the body was given money to keep his mouth shut
The other paper says that Joran gave patrick money to not reveal the name of the person who dumped the body


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Tater on March 06, 2008, 02:05:24 PM
This monkey ain't buying.. ::MonkeyNoNo:: No matter if Joran did tell Patrick a name,what's it good for? Nothing so far Patrick has done has brought about anything as far as getting Yoran prosecuted.Even if Yoran did spill a name,it isn't anything.Big Deal..Got any proof outside of Yorans word?Doubt it..He 's a liar,remember? I won't be buying Patrick's book until I see many locked up for good..I am so disgusted right now....:(


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 06, 2008, 02:07:15 PM
The following statement implies that the prosecutor's office played a role is have its own appeal turned down and ... the statement also  affirms that Joran van der Sloot is once again a suspect.

This official statement is very important.  It cites exactly what the reasoning was behind the behind the ruling of the Appeal's Court ... the ruling that determined that the Peter Devries' video recording was insufficient evidence to once again detain Joran van der Sloot.

Janet

+++++++++++++

February 15, 2008

Court of Appeal upholds lower judge’s decision not to detain J.v.d.S.

J.v.d.S remains prime suspect
Judicial investigation continues


The Court of Appeal announced by the end of yesterday, February 14th, 2008, its decision to uphold the refusal by the investigating judge to order pre-trial detention of J.v.d.S. in the case of the disappearance of Natalee Holloway. The Office of the Public Prosecutor had requested such an order after the “Peter R de Vries-tapes” had been received by the Office and had been evaluated. Last week the Office appealed the ruling of refusal by the judge.

The reasons underlying the Court’s decision are the following. The Court has seen the visual materials, has listened to the audio materials and has inspected the verbatim reports. Based on that, the Court is of the opinion that there is a lack of sufficient facts and circumstances substantiating serious grounds for the suspicion of the suspect’s involvement in the crimes for which he is being held responsible by the prosecution. The Court will generally be a bit more hesitant when it has to decide on a new request for pre-trial detention of a suspect, when that same suspect has been detained repeatedly before and there has been a considerable lapse of time.

J.v.d.S. has given extensive and detailed statements in Patrick van der Eem’s car, the undercover citizen who worked for Peter R. de Vries, on what happened during the night of the disappearance of Natalee Holloway. Nevertheless the Court sees various reasons not to accept the serious grounds of suspicion which are statutorily required for pre-trial detention. One of them is the history of contradictory statements by J.v.d.S., which were belied repeatedly by objective findings.

At this moment those parts of the statements made in Van der Eem’s car which contain new elements are not being underpinned by objective findings. Considering the possibility of a serious personality disorder – as voiced by the prosecution – combined with a personal history of untrue statements and remarks, which even according to the suspect himself are frequently false, the Court of Appeal has reasons for doubt regarding the incriminating character of the “car-statements.”

On the pre-trial detention issue the Code of criminal procedure does not provide for further appeals. The effect of the Court decision is that J.v.d.S. cannot be (re)arrested. The investigation of the Natalee Holloway case continues. J.v.d.S. is again the prime suspect.  

At the end of the investigation the Office of the Public Prosecution will decide whether to charge or not



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: caesu on March 06, 2008, 02:09:40 PM
i wonder how high the chances are Bram Mosko is doing the civil case now.
yesterday it was 90% chance.

but if all this Patrick stuff is true, he could also sue Patrick for shock damage.

Beth is getting therapy already Bram said yesterday.

also wonder if Beth is still in the netherlands, i hope she is back home.
few days ago they all sat on that sofa.
(http://i28.tinypic.com/2mruqfd.png)

again, i'll wait for peter r. response to this to make an opinion on this news.


If what is true?

that patrick knows who threw natalee in the ocean and got money from joran to stay silent about that.

Again, that scenario just does not make sense. If you got money from someone to keep quiet about a murder you don't go talking about it to someone you just met, let alone, a reporter. I guess we will have to wait for part #2 to come out to make sense of this.

yes this scenario doesn't make sense. we will have to wait where this goes.
maybe after tonights broadcast on aruba-tv more will become clear.

i haven't got a opinion on this yet, first i want to know more.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on March 06, 2008, 02:10:13 PM
 ::MonkeyEek:: ::MonkeyEek::

Post on Gretawire blog:

"Comment by maureen in CA
March 6th, 2008 at 2:01 pm
Just got off scaredmonkeys. Within the Natalee blog, there are comments on an article re transhipment of drugs from Aruba, and there are presently 15 comments talking about Patrick van eem being secretly taped after a TV interview telling he knows who disposed of Natalee at sea and Joran asking for 2,000 euros from Patrick to have the guy who took Natalee out to sea killed. All the reports are in Dutch, and you’re only able to pick up this breaking news from the comments in English. I think something important is breaking here."


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Anna on March 06, 2008, 02:14:02 PM
The following statement implies that the prosecutor's office played a role is have its own appeal turned down and ... the statement also  affirms that Joran van der Sloot is once again a suspect.

This official statement is very important.  It cites exactly what the reasoning was behind the behind the ruling of the Appeal's Court ... the ruling that determined that the Peter Devries' video recording was insufficient evidence to once again detain Joran van der Sloot.

Janet

+++++++++++++

February 15, 2008

Court of Appeal upholds lower judge’s decision not to detain J.v.d.S.

J.v.d.S remains prime suspect
Judicial investigation continues


The Court of Appeal announced by the end of yesterday, February 14th, 2008, its decision to uphold the refusal by the investigating judge to order pre-trial detention of J.v.d.S. in the case of the disappearance of Natalee Holloway. The Office of the Public Prosecutor had requested such an order after the “Peter R de Vries-tapes” had been received by the Office and had been evaluated. Last week the Office appealed the ruling of refusal by the judge.

The reasons underlying the Court’s decision are the following. The Court has seen the visual materials, has listened to the audio materials and has inspected the verbatim reports. Based on that, the Court is of the opinion that there is a lack of sufficient facts and circumstances substantiating serious grounds for the suspicion of the suspect’s involvement in the crimes for which he is being held responsible by the prosecution. The Court will generally be a bit more hesitant when it has to decide on a new request for pre-trial detention of a suspect, when that same suspect has been detained repeatedly before and there has been a considerable lapse of time.

J.v.d.S. has given extensive and detailed statements in Patrick van der Eem’s car, the undercover citizen who worked for Peter R. de Vries, on what happened during the night of the disappearance of Natalee Holloway. Nevertheless the Court sees various reasons not to accept the serious grounds of suspicion which are statutorily required for pre-trial detention. One of them is the history of contradictory statements by J.v.d.S., which were belied repeatedly by objective findings.

At this moment those parts of the statements made in Van der Eem’s car which contain new elements are not being underpinned by objective findings. Considering the possibility of a serious personality disorder – as voiced by the prosecution – combined with a personal history of untrue statements and remarks, which even according to the suspect himself are frequently false, the Court of Appeal has reasons for doubt regarding the incriminating character of the “car-statements.”

On the pre-trial detention issue the Code of criminal procedure does not provide for further appeals. The effect of the Court decision is that J.v.d.S. cannot be (re)arrested. The investigation of the Natalee Holloway case continues. J.v.d.S. is again the prime suspect.  

At the end of the investigation the Office of the Public Prosecution will decide whether to charge or not





Janet,
Do you know where this item was published?

TIA


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: hotping on March 06, 2008, 02:14:23 PM
The continuing saga in the "TWILIGHT ZONE"!  ::MonkeyShocked::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: suisse71 on March 06, 2008, 02:15:27 PM
BY JOS at BFN

summary>>

Patrick claims to be friends with Joran for years.

patrick says he knows who dumped Natalee's body in the sea. Joran supposedly has paid him to keep his mouth shut

Patrick made those remarks on Aruba TV. He thought the camera's were out.

One of the camera was still rolling. His remarks are translated by a translating company at request of magazine De Nieuwe revu.

"Since i know Joran for years...". This is in contradiction what he said before.

Patrick say he intends to continue to bother the VDS family with the knowledge he has.

One day Joran will fall on his face. You don't know what the other family membets are doing. I will make them bitter.
 
Peter's show offered new openings but the judge decided Joran could not be arrested for fantasy telling.

Who the heck pad who, that's what I want to know, since there are two translations apparently regarding this "small" detail.

It s not 2 translations. The one paper says it was money to give to the guy who dumped the body. The other says that joran paid patrick to not tell the name.


Hi all,

Wait a minute. In the Devries Dutch version, which is in the forum, Patrick & Joran talking about something to the effect -

Patrick "Joran we have to give that guy some money for what he did for you.  We are going to make alot of money Joran, we have to give him(Daury) some money"

Joran "Yeah, blah blah....."

Basically they are talking about Joran thinks he going to make some major $$$$ with Patrick selling drugs and Joran's is waiting for his big cash payout in 10 years, etc.  While, IMO, Patrick was trying to find out who this is guy is who "dumped the body in the ocean" and he thinks that guy needs to be "compensated" for "what he did for Joran"  I wonder if this is really what they are talking about, NOT that Patrick knows for sure who threw the body in the ocean, but more speculation. 

Sorry don't recall the exact words, but I imagine Klaasend can give us that link in the forum. 

Separate note, the 2000 euro may explain the ATM w/d in the wee hours.  Again did Paulus make those 2 ATM w/d or was it Joran using his Daddy's card???

ALSO - Patrick's agent Vigilano is a master at marketing, pure genuis - he would know what Patrick should say publicly to spike interest in his book and to drive the sales.  With Vig as his agent, he will make major $$$$.

j4n!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Anna on March 06, 2008, 02:16:42 PM
::MonkeyEek:: ::MonkeyEek::

Post on Gretawire blog:

"Comment by maureen in CA
March 6th, 2008 at 2:01 pm
Just got off scaredmonkeys. Within the Natalee blog, there are comments on an article re transhipment of drugs from Aruba, and there are presently 15 comments talking about Patrick van eem being secretly taped after a TV interview telling he knows who disposed of Natalee at sea and Joran asking for 2,000 euros from Patrick to have the guy who took Natalee out to sea killed. All the reports are in Dutch, and you’re only able to pick up this breaking news from the comments in English. I think something important is breaking here."


Killed???  Where did that come from?  I hope it was not Elmer Fudd!  Don't these people watch cartoons at all?


 ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyNoNo:: ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Observer on March 06, 2008, 02:16:54 PM
Just one thing in the back of my mind and that is that Joran wanted to help this "Daury" or person that helped him with Money. He mentioned this to Patrick in the tapes. Since Katrien explained that it is two people writing about one recording,I seriously doubt anything was paid to the person that helped dump Natalee and that writer is not telling the truth.

Patrick is no Dummy and I think is very street smart,he will definetly be saving interesting things so people will buy his book. Of course there are those that wish him harm and want to see him fail. I think Peter R is right,he does not know for sure who helped Joran but he has his suspicions. I will be shocked if he was told another name besides Daury but decided to keep that confidential,as that would destroy his trust with Beth,Peter and everyone else he said that he was helping. Since he mentioned he is going to bring down the VDS Family and they should move to Africa I think that is a strong hint who he thinks Daury is.MO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: jackb on March 06, 2008, 02:17:05 PM
Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 12:59 pm    BY Glenda at RU

According to those that have seen the full 20 minutes... Patrick says that even the Police made money...

We have to wait until tonight to see if that indeed was said or just someone's interpretation. 

~~~~~~~~~Can we please get the AVY's shut off? It is taking me 3 minutes or more to load a page and I am on high speed.

Keep your home page to bring up the I-net, then hit the "x" to send it back after your I-net is up and use FIREFOX browser on this to browse with.   jack b.  Sometimes if you have a popup killer in place it cannot get through.  Run the window cleaner at different times during the readings and/or postings to keep so many pop ups and clutter at bay.  You will get a rhythm with it.  Firefox works best it seems with this.  You can keep your other toobar and the firefox tool bar on the same pate.  Yahoo and firefox work good together.  Windows explorer needs to be turned off by the "x" as I said as soon as the I-net comes up.  Put you a firefox icon on your desktop and then use this to search and go into your places with.      Jack b


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Jo-An on March 06, 2008, 02:17:17 PM
Remember Patrick was saying to Joran in the tapes, that he would give Joran money to give to this guy (who dumped the body) because this guy is pure gold to have done something like that for Joran?
Apparantly "Daury" is not a very rich guy, if EUR 2000.- is enough to shut him up.
So maybe this is information that is in the remaining 19 hrs of tape.
God this is so confusing but exiting at the same time...
I think cameras hidden in the potted plants were maybe at Patricks house or at his company? Maybe they did some taping there as well, which we haven't seen yet (the other 19 hrs).



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Destiny on March 06, 2008, 02:17:40 PM
The following statement implies that the prosecutor's office played a role is have its own appeal turned down and ... the statement also  affirms that Joran van der Sloot is once again a suspect.

This official statement is very important.  It cites exactly what the reasoning was behind the behind the ruling of the Appeal's Court ... the ruling that determined that the Peter Devries' video recording was insufficient evidence to once again detain Joran van der Sloot.

Janet

+++++++++++++

February 15, 2008

Court of Appeal upholds lower judge’s decision not to detain J.v.d.S.

J.v.d.S remains prime suspect
Judicial investigation continues


The Court of Appeal announced by the end of yesterday, February 14th, 2008, its decision to uphold the refusal by the investigating judge to order pre-trial detention of J.v.d.S. in the case of the disappearance of Natalee Holloway. The Office of the Public Prosecutor had requested such an order after the “Peter R de Vries-tapes” had been received by the Office and had been evaluated. Last week the Office appealed the ruling of refusal by the judge.

The reasons underlying the Court’s decision are the following. The Court has seen the visual materials, has listened to the audio materials and has inspected the verbatim reports. Based on that, the Court is of the opinion that there is a lack of sufficient facts and circumstances substantiating serious grounds for the suspicion of the suspect’s involvement in the crimes for which he is being held responsible by the prosecution. The Court will generally be a bit more hesitant when it has to decide on a new request for pre-trial detention of a suspect, when that same suspect has been detained repeatedly before and there has been a considerable lapse of time.

J.v.d.S. has given extensive and detailed statements in Patrick van der Eem’s car, the undercover citizen who worked for Peter R. de Vries, on what happened during the night of the disappearance of Natalee Holloway. Nevertheless the Court sees various reasons not to accept the serious grounds of suspicion which are statutorily required for pre-trial detention. One of them is the history of contradictory statements by J.v.d.S., which were belied repeatedly by objective findings.

At this moment those parts of the statements made in Van der Eem’s car which contain new elements are not being underpinned by objective findings. Considering the possibility of a serious personality disorder – as voiced by the prosecution – combined with a personal history of untrue statements and remarks, which even according to the suspect himself are frequently false, the Court of Appeal has reasons for doubt regarding the incriminating character of the “car-statements.”

On the pre-trial detention issue the Code of criminal procedure does not provide for further appeals. The effect of the Court decision is that J.v.d.S. cannot be (re)arrested. The investigation of the Natalee Holloway case continues. J.v.d.S. is again the prime suspect.  

At the end of the investigation the Office of the Public Prosecution will decide whether to charge or not



Janet....what you wrote here, makes sense to me...as much as anything about this case makes sense....I only *Pray* that you are right on!

Tot...I have that *queasy* feeling too...I just hope the ball of rubber bands, each one being another lie, banded on top of each other...is getting so big that the new lies have to stretch so far, that they are reaching their breaking point....at least before I reach mine....head spinning faster.... ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on March 06, 2008, 02:21:33 PM
I use Windows ME...have been for many years. I cannot use FF, thanks anyway. This is the only site that I have trouble loading.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Anna on March 06, 2008, 02:22:38 PM
O/T

News Conference from Police on the Auburn student recently found dead from gunshot wounds.

1:30 on Fox News


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 06, 2008, 02:30:20 PM
Considering that Joran van der Sloot just found out he was caught on tape .... why is he not outraged ... why is he upholding Patrick van der Eem and Peter Devries.

Also ... Joran foretells that he will not be touched by authorities ... his lies will be verified ... his lies will save him.

Something is not right ... especially when you consider Joran's anger issues. 

Janet

++++++++++++++


Joran Van der Sloot
Pauw & Witteman
(Phone Interview/Grandma's house)
February 4, 2008


Question: How did this all happen, with this so called confession.

Joran: Yes, I did say something to someone I should not have said, it's a story to someone I have know for a while.

Question: How long have you known him?

Joran: about 6 months.

Question:  What did you tell him:

Joran:  Yes, well everyone will see it this Sunday, ha ha ha , but I can easily proof that what I said is not true, it's a whole lot about nothing, and it's kinda sad that they brought the mother over here and that they told her, but we'll see it all.

Question: Is it now not right to say right now what you said, and why it is that what you said is not true.

Joran: I talked to my parents and my lawyer and they told me how it is, and they said also , just don't say anything.

Question: The news said tonight that it's about the news that after you made out with Natalee that you , that she got sick, and became lifeless, and that you called a friend and he came with a boat and that you went on the boat with her and that you threw her in the water , you glide her in the water.

Joran, Yes, that's what I said.

Question: Is that not very dumb of you to say that?

Joran: Yes it is very dumb, but what I'm trying to say is that I have build up a relationship with someone for 6 months, and yes, that person, it's very difficult to explain, but that person did very brave (?), and I told him what he wanted to hear.  

Question: How did you know what he wanted to hear?

Joran: Well I had my suspicion a little bit, because he talked to other friends of mine, I did not have a super good feeling towards him,

Question: but then, Joran it is unbelievable dumb to just say this, if it's not true.

Joran: It's so dumb, it's so dumb, it's so dumb, it's really dumb.

Question: Do you think you will be arrested again?

JJoran:  No, I don't think so. Maybe it could be, they have arrested me before for less than this, but I have been tricked.

Question: Have you talked more to this friend who got this story from you?

Joran: I just had a conversation with him, for about 20 minutes.

Question: and did you (uitgekafferd) **** (lol) on him?

Joran: No, I still talk with him normal.

Question: But he betrayed you, or not?

Joran: Yes, but he does not want to talk, he says, what is coming is coming on sunday.

Question: but we've heard that he received money from peter van de vries, to get a confession from you.

Joran: Yes, I don't know, I think he has more than enough money himself, but, we'll see.

Question: what kind of boy is he?

Joran: You see, I don't know what they are going to show this sunday, but this is a boy, he's an older man, I met him, and we've met a lot, I found him to be fascinating, I was very interested in him, and I, ha ha ha, just told him what he wanted to hear,

Question: but how did you not know then that he was not honest, that you told him just what he wanted to hear?

Joran: Yes well, he did a lot of thing you should not do, things that I would never do myself, some of these things he did do,

Question: example?

Joran: I don't want to give an example, I don't want to talk someone down, but it now shows that he used me. (loose translation)

Question: yes with a hidden microphone and a hidden camera, you never noticed that, it would seem.

Joran: These days these things are so little, but it's just been unbelievable dumb, really really, not normal dumb, and I hope that will become more peaceful because it seems that all hell is breaking loose.

Question: Have you had contact with the boy that might have moved the body of Natalee?

Joran: Yes, no, that's just a boy I met on Aruba, just now, when I was there,

Question: Did you speak to him?

Joran: But now I just met him.

Question: Does the police have contact with this boy now?

Joran: Yes, well I don't know, I don't know it all. I have talked to my parents and my lawyer, and I just don't know what's happening now. I don't know what the OM is thinking. I think they are going to investigate it all, and it will show that it is not that way.

Question: you have contact with your dad, does your dad have contact with the OM?

Joran: I don't know, I think he had a conversation with Mr. Mos, but it's only about security.

Question: Oh so it was not about an new investigation?

Joran: No

Question: Because, Mr Mos has said, this is the missing part, your confession.

Joran: Yes, it's very (vervelend) nasty but what I said was not true, and they can found out if it's true or not.

Question: So you did not go with Natalee in a boat into the water and put her in the water?

Joran: No of course not.

Question: That did not happen for sure?

Joran: No,

Question: And how can we find out that that is not true, as you say?

Joran: Yes, I don't know, it has to do with that person, that after two and a half years with that person, that's not possible.  (Joran talks in half sentences here) No, I, it's just been very stupid.

Question: do you blame de Vries?  

Joran : NO, he does his job, I think that sunday night will bring very good tv night , but it's too bad that with this there are a lot of feelings for a lot of people involved here, and they will be hurt, and that's not a good tv program, but that's the way it is.

Question: Joran, but now for all the people that are now thinking, Joran vd Sloot has lied from the beginning , and we talked around this table with Peter de Vries, and now it seems like again he lied again to someone else, why should we believe Joran vd Sloot?

Joran: Yes, I ask myself the same thing, there is no reason to believe me.

Question: are you going to watch sunday evening?

Joran: I think I will watch sunday evening, I

Question: will you consider to come to our program the next day to give your reaction?

Joran: I don't know, I think for myself I don't want to react, I'm pretty sober about it, but we'll see.

We'll call on monday again.
Thank you very much.

Translation - Marco@RU

++++++++++++


Joran Van der Sloot
Pauw & Witteman
(Phone Interview/Grandma's house)
February 4, 2008


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pu0QWaD27y4



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: caesu on March 06, 2008, 02:31:04 PM
interesting reading to get the whole police chief replacement problem understood.
david dick is of course also justice minister for bonaire.

if the justice minister of the antilles is going down this is a huge scandal.


Mercelina said there was a situation in Bonaire similar to that in St. Maarten. The Netherlands will not extend the contract of Police Chief Commissioner Johan van der Straten and NAPB believes that again a Dutch replacement will be appointed.


http://www.thedailyherald.com/news/daily/k222/blow222.html

jan = short for johan
  So, that johan is pronounced YO han (is dirty.)  So we have a Dirtyhand....wonder if it isthe Dirty Hand? Someone knew his first name and may have dubbed him that.  He needs to be arrested for slandering the populace of Aruba and helping to cause a worse financial disaster than a major explosion in the region.  He needs to be placed in a cell where he can paint and photograph mocking images of the prison.  He is a terrorist to his own country and those who are trying to live the right way.    Jack b

now we have st. maarten and Bonaire without a police chief.
and antilles justice minister in very awkward position.

i keep following this st. maarten situation.
it could bring the justice minister down there. could have riple effect towards aruba.

very paranoia statement today by Economic Affairs Commissioner Maria Buncamper-Molanus.

Quote
“Perhaps this is a setup, because politicians in the Netherlands Antilles will do anything to opposing parties to get in government,” she said.

http://www.thedailyherald.com/news/daily/k247/maria247.html

very good english blog imo about corruption on st. maarten:
http://sxmprivateeye.com/node/215
many americans post there.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: JE on March 06, 2008, 02:32:17 PM
::MonkeyEek:: ::MonkeyEek::

Post on Gretawire blog:

"Comment by maureen in CA
March 6th, 2008 at 2:01 pm
Just got off scaredmonkeys. Within the Natalee blog, there are comments on an article re transhipment of drugs from Aruba, and there are presently 15 comments talking about Patrick van eem being secretly taped after a TV interview telling he knows who disposed of Natalee at sea and Joran asking for 2,000 euros from Patrick to have the guy who took Natalee out to sea killed. All the reports are in Dutch, and you’re only able to pick up this breaking news from the comments in English. I think something important is breaking here."


Killed???  Where did that come from?  I hope it was not Elmer Fudd!  Don't these people watch cartoons at all?


 ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyNoNo:: ::MonkeyConfused::


It never said killed anywhere LOL. Classic example of the telephone game.

Another rumour

http://misdaadjournalist.web-log.nl/misdaadjournalist/2008/02/patrick-van-d-1.html

Patrick has been in the american witness protection programm


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 06, 2008, 02:32:23 PM
An earlier post about the press release:


My comments in red:


Quote from: Nut44x4 on February 15, 2008, 12:06:13 PM
She provided no link.....
Here goes>>>>>
Glenda Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 12:38 pm   

Court of Appeal upholds lower judge’s decision not to detain J.v.d.S.

J.v.d.S remains prime suspect
Judicial investigation continues

The Court of Appeal announced by the end of yesterday, February 14th, 2008, its decision to uphold the refusal by the investigating judge to order pre-trial detention of J.v.d.S. in the case of the disappearance of Natalee Holloway. The Office of the Public Prosecutor had requested such an order after the “Peter R de Vries-tapes” had been received by the Office and had been evaluated. Last week the Office appealed the ruling of refusal by the judge.

The reasons underlying the Court’s decision are the following. The Court has seen the visual materials, has listened to the audio materials and has inspected the verbatim reports. Based on that, the Court is of the opinion that there is a lack of sufficient facts and circumstances substantiating serious grounds for the suspicion of the suspect’s involvement in the crimes for which he is being held responsible by the prosecution. The Court will generally be a bit more hesitant when it has to decide on a new request for pre-trial detention of a suspect, when that same suspect has been detained repeatedly before and there has been a considerable lapse of time.

How can what he said not be deemed serious? He watched her die and called to have her body disposed of, how the hell is that not serious? And why should the "lapse in time" matter, its new information, a confession, the timing of its release should be irrelevent? You're saying you're hesitant...hesitant, what the hell are you hesitating for? Please we all want to know what the friggin probelm is.  

Jv.d.S. has given extensive and detailed statements in Patrick van der Eem’s car, the undercover citizen who worked for Peter R. de Vries, on what happened during the night of the disappearance of Natalee Holloway. Nevertheless the Court sees various reasons not to accept the serious grounds of suspicion which are statutorily required for pre-trial detention. One of them is the history of contradictory statements by J.v.d.S., which were belied repeatedly by objective findings.

This paragraph really pisses me off. He gave "extensive and detailed statements" because he had intimate knowledge of what occured. Such statements of detail could only have been made by someone who was there. So they are saying they can't believe him because he is a liar and because of his lies related to the case he is believed not to be involved. If you are to follow this thinking all someone would have to do to be found innocent is change their story multiple times and be deemed a liar. I'm sorry, but this is the most fucked up line of reasoning I have ever heard of. How can they write this crap to the world? Oh, and there is no such thing as "objectiveness" in this investigation. Again, you can't possible claim objectiveness because the people that should have recused themselves in the beginning didn't and are complicit in the cover-up. One more time, this paragraph sucks.

At this moment those parts of the statements made in Van der Eem’s car which contain new elements are not being underpinned by objective findings. Considering the possibility of a serious personality disorder – as voiced by the prosecution – combined with a personal history of untrue statements and remarks, which even according to the suspect himself are frequently false, the Court of Appeal has reasons for doubt regarding the incriminating character of the “car-statements.”

Another claim that because Joran lies, he cannot be believed, but is to be believed he is not involved. And the phrase "according to the suspect himself are freqeuently false" also pisses me off. You just made the point in the previous paragraph that he cannot be believed and that is why you don't see sufficient evidence to re-arrest, yet, you now are backing up your assessment that he lies with his own words, "according to the suspect himself." This is plain stupid. And what is up with emphasizing that the prosecution brought up the personality disorder? Why would they do that and why would the court go out of its way to let us know that they did so? Again, this is fcking sickening.

On the pre-trial detention issue the Code of criminal procedure does not provide for further appeals. The effect of the Court decision is that J.v.d.S. cannot be (re)arrested. The investigation of the Natalee Holloway case continues. J.v.d.S. is again the prime suspect.

Well, let's throw a friggin party shall we!!

At the end of the investigation the Office of the Public Prosecution will decide whether to charge or not. 

May GOD have mercy on these people.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Observer on March 06, 2008, 02:34:09 PM
Remember Patrick was saying to Joran in the tapes, that he would give Joran money to give to this guy (who dumped the body) because this guy is pure gold to have done something like that for Joran?
Apparantly "Daury" is not a very rich guy, if EUR 2000.- is enough to shut him up.
So maybe this is information that is in the remaining 19 hrs of tape.
God this is so confusing but exiting at the same time...
I think cameras hidden in the potted plants were maybe at Patricks house or at his company? Maybe they did some taping there as well, which we haven't seen yet (the other 19 hrs).



Yes or that person was just having money problems at the time and Joran would like to help him. We saw even less then the Dutch viewers saw but your right many hours left on tape as Peter R says he confessed 10 times. I would be suprised if the camera and microphones were only used in the Range Rover and I would be equally suprised if Joran did not talk more about the Kalpoes and other people.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 06, 2008, 02:35:22 PM
The "rumor" about Patrick being hired for murder started on the front page of SM in the comment section:

It was posted by Dolf:

Dolf on March 6th, 2008 10:38 am
among other things he claims Joran offered him € 2.00,- to kill the guy who dumped miss. Holloway in the ocean.

this was said in an interview with Aruban tv after 1 of the camera’s was switched off, P. van der Eem was under the impression that both camera’s were switched off when he said this.



I don't think Dolf knows jack doodo about what he is talking about. Can you say "lost in translation". The funny thing is that this one comment was picked up by someone that posted over on Greta, which was in turn posted back here in the forums.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: jackb on March 06, 2008, 02:37:08 PM
This is exactly what the other side wants is to not find Patrick credible and have him contradict himself. Also in order for him to sell many copies of his book he will need something juicy inside of it like who he thinks dumped Natalee in the ocean. If he already knows and was told another name besides Daury then he has some explaining to do.MO

Joran is simply trying to pull the crime away from "Daury" (daddy) by making it look like it is someone who he has to pay to keep quiet.  He may have been a bit paranoid that day and realized he was talking too much.  As for Patrick knowing who threw the body into the ocean, he may be like us using his best information to form an opinion about who it is.    Jack b


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 06, 2008, 02:41:10 PM
The following statement implies that the prosecutor's office played a role is have its own appeal turned down and ... the statement also  affirms that Joran van der Sloot is once again a suspect.

This official statement is very important.  It cites exactly what the reasoning was behind the behind the ruling of the Appeal's Court ... the ruling that determined that the Peter Devries' video recording was insufficient evidence to once again detain Joran van der Sloot.

Janet

+++++++++++++

February 15, 2008

Court of Appeal upholds lower judge’s decision not to detain J.v.d.S.

J.v.d.S remains prime suspect
Judicial investigation continues


The Court of Appeal announced by the end of yesterday, February 14th, 2008, its decision to uphold the refusal by the investigating judge to order pre-trial detention of J.v.d.S. in the case of the disappearance of Natalee Holloway. The Office of the Public Prosecutor had requested such an order after the “Peter R de Vries-tapes” had been received by the Office and had been evaluated. Last week the Office appealed the ruling of refusal by the judge.

The reasons underlying the Court’s decision are the following. The Court has seen the visual materials, has listened to the audio materials and has inspected the verbatim reports. Based on that, the Court is of the opinion that there is a lack of sufficient facts and circumstances substantiating serious grounds for the suspicion of the suspect’s involvement in the crimes for which he is being held responsible by the prosecution. The Court will generally be a bit more hesitant when it has to decide on a new request for pre-trial detention of a suspect, when that same suspect has been detained repeatedly before and there has been a considerable lapse of time.

J.v.d.S. has given extensive and detailed statements in Patrick van der Eem’s car, the undercover citizen who worked for Peter R. de Vries, on what happened during the night of the disappearance of Natalee Holloway. Nevertheless the Court sees various reasons not to accept the serious grounds of suspicion which are statutorily required for pre-trial detention. One of them is the history of contradictory statements by J.v.d.S., which were belied repeatedly by objective findings.

At this moment those parts of the statements made in Van der Eem’s car which contain new elements are not being underpinned by objective findings. Considering the possibility of a serious personality disorder – as voiced by the prosecution – combined with a personal history of untrue statements and remarks, which even according to the suspect himself are frequently false, the Court of Appeal has reasons for doubt regarding the incriminating character of the “car-statements.”

On the pre-trial detention issue the Code of criminal procedure does not provide for further appeals. The effect of the Court decision is that J.v.d.S. cannot be (re)arrested. The investigation of the Natalee Holloway case continues. J.v.d.S. is again the prime suspect.  

At the end of the investigation the Office of the Public Prosecution will decide whether to charge or not





Janet,
Do you know where this item was published?

TIA


http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2605.msg350819;topicseen#msg350819

Klaasend:

Re: Natalee Case Discussion #731 2/14 -
« Reply #912 on: February 15, 2008, 09:08:47 PM »

Posted at RU by Glenda - no link of course:

Court of Appeal upholds lower judge’s decision not to detain J.v.d.S.

J.v.d.S remains prime suspect
Judicial investigation continues

The Court of Appeal announced by the end of yesterday, February 14th, 2008, its decision to uphold the refusal by the investigating judge to order pre-trial detention ...

<snipped>


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: caesu on March 06, 2008, 02:42:41 PM
BY JOS at BFN

summary>>

Patrick claims to be friends with Joran for years.

patrick says he knows who dumped Natalee's body in the sea. Joran supposedly has paid him to keep his mouth shut

Patrick made those remarks on Aruba TV. He thought the camera's were out.

One of the camera was still rolling. His remarks are translated by a translating company at request of magazine De Nieuwe revu.

"Since i know Joran for years...". This is in contradiction what he said before.

Patrick say he intends to continue to bother the VDS family with the knowledge he has.

One day Joran will fall on his face. You don't know what the other family membets are doing. I will make them bitter.
 
Peter's show offered new openings but the judge decided Joran could not be arrested for fantasy telling.

Who the heck pad who, that's what I want to know, since there are two translations apparently regarding this "small" detail.

yes there is confusion about that detail.
it's like different sources tried to translate the papiamentu transcript from aruba-tv and one got it wrong.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 06, 2008, 02:44:53 PM
BY JOS at BFN

summary>>

Patrick claims to be friends with Joran for years.

patrick says he knows who dumped Natalee's body in the sea. Joran supposedly has paid him to keep his mouth shut

Patrick made those remarks on Aruba TV. He thought the camera's were out.

One of the camera was still rolling. His remarks are translated by a translating company at request of magazine De Nieuwe revu.

"Since i know Joran for years...". This is in contradiction what he said before.

Patrick say he intends to continue to bother the VDS family with the knowledge he has.

One day Joran will fall on his face. You don't know what the other family membets are doing. I will make them bitter.
 
Peter's show offered new openings but the judge decided Joran could not be arrested for fantasy telling.

Who the heck pad who, that's what I want to know, since there are two translations apparently regarding this "small" detail.

yes there is confusion about that detail.
it's like different sources tried to translate the papiamentu transcript from aruba-tv and one got it wrong.

That is what I was trying to get across to JE, that there is/are translation issues on multiple levels here.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on March 06, 2008, 02:45:37 PM
luvslalom @ RU Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 2:40 pm   
Patrick/Poentje tapes translation

There are 2 different You tube translations done from Pap to English with THANKS to Reaver/Aruba.
The last part on which tonights show will be on was a translation from Dutch to English.


PvdE: (inaudible) ...... the Netherlands, he lied everything together, unbelievable

PC: You are telling me that there is too much lying, for it not to be true?

PvdE: see, he doesn't want to tell exactly what he did to the girl, you know, maybe she died of GHB or maybe they gang raped her or something like that must have happened. This girl didn't die of natural causes.

PC: One more time, do you think that you have asked all the questions you would've wanted to ask?

PvdE: see, now afterwards there are some questions you can.....look, the ambulance thing, why didn't he call an ambulance? That's a question that I regret not asking. (..)

PC: But if you get a second chance that is the additional question you will ask?

PvdE: ofcourse, sure! you understand?! to see his reaction on that. Since the beginning he told me about....... we have more than 10 auto rides, 20 something hours on tape I couldn't have cut in...... many times I ask the same questions, sometimes I go harder on him, you know...and he tells me "no way no way, don't you believe me?" then I had to back off a little bit again you understand?.

PC: Are you still in contact with him?

PvdE: No.

PC: Do you want to have contact with him?

PvdE: No, no, why must I have contact with a person like that? See, I want contact with him when he wants me to tell him what to do. He must go to a TBS clinic stay in there for 2 years to find out what is wrong with Joran van der Sloot, because there are many things wrong with this man, many many things, you understand? And ...Good friend? It was never my intention for him to be my friend. See, sometimes, there were times I laugh with him, you understand? But yeah, he's a 20 year old man, not everything Joran does is bad. But yeah, the thing he did, that’s where he went wrong. If the thing happened to me or you, I know what you would've done, you know what I would've done.. Aruba is small everything is close by; I would've call the ambulance immediately. Why not?!

PC: Pactrick van der Eem, is going for fame?

PvdE. That's correct.

*************************************************************



(inaudible)..
PvdE: ……no no no that’s the thing you understand?

PC: But do you see my show any different than all the other persons that talked to you?

PvdE: Yes, no but it good it the first in Aruba.

PC: Will you give me your telephone number and e-mail address and I can contact you and give you the information exactly what time it will begin and which site you can go to watch it.

PvdE: yes sure! My number is 0031………..

PC: wait I’ll write it down…. Look how I called this project…

PvdE: (Zwarte Sloot) Black Ditch.(they laugh): no, out of the (Sloot) ditch, IN the ditch…. 00316107209XX

PC: How minutes do you have Niche? 17? I calculated it good; I calculated 15 minutes good good good. We did talk a lot right?.......(laughter) I want a beer, you want something?

PvdE: no no thank you….209 (beep beep)

PC: you don’t want a juice or anything?

PvdE: No no thank you in a minute I’m going to for a swim with my children

PC: Ah. Ok.. this is your line?

PvdE: yes my line

PC: what is your e-mail address?

PvdE: p(beep beep)@planet.nl, that correct, but, no, see…. The police talked to them and they have a lot of things.. and I have a lot of things

PC: bring a towel for me.. Let me tell you something, I am involucrated in this thing but I never did like this (inaudible) I have information that the police have and never used. I will aired it in this show.

PvdE: what kind of information? About him, Joran?

PC:No, about what also could have happen to Natalee Holloway and nobody bother to use this information. And this will I show this day, information that is..,..how old is this situation 3 years? The information is 2.5 have nearly 3 years old. Not that I want….., I don’t say he didn’t (inaudible) ….until this case is closed every possibility must remain open.

PvdE: what do you think then? It happened at the beach, it happened at home…..

PC: well, yes, but I,… you know what happens? When I talk to you, I feel…. When you talk to somebody his energy goes in you. You lived with this guy…this guy is still in you my brother…

PvdE: NO….

PC: this guy of course! I feel somewhere you are making me doubt you. (beep) when I saw you on the tv I got a feeling I never got before. I saw an incredible acting. This guys had you through, this guy knew you were looking for information out of him, and he was going to give you the information for you to help him with the supposed deal. I didn’t want old facts that you talked about in other shows, I want new facts.. (inaudible, beeping), you know what I mean?

PvdE:But wait, I could have not lived with myself, if I knew him for many years and knowing that he did something like this . .But now I took it off like it was nothing. But this thing had to be this way man. When I heard that he was coming to Arnhem, I thought about it already, see when I meet you I will finish you off, I knew it then. I enter the casino (beep).. there I threw my fishingline, and I held him on a line for 7 months… (beep) the second time they picked him up……

PC. That they detained him you mean?

PvdE. No they picked him up one time they put him in jail, I was in the Netherlands

*************************************************************
Dutch to English

PvdE: It was on a Wednesday and we would start with it Monday.

PC: Ah, yes, yes.

PvdE: I had thought of some things myself, from hidden mini-camera's in plants till even an Internet and phone connection that were tapped. But I will tell you something, he spends a lot of money.

PC: Which parties are involved in this?

PvdE:The Press gets something, but also the police officers involved. Look, when a problem of this magnitude happens on Aruba people will get a different view, because all he says is just incredible!

PC: Yes, and it will be repeating itself.

PvdE: Yes, and the whole image of him will be getting worse.

PvdE: Let me tell you something, there is something strange about the story of the other boy.

PvdE: But I know who has dumped her into the sea.

TO BE CONTINUED.

Comment of PC:

Let me first make clear that what you see Patrick smoke is just a normal cigarette. I am not smoking either.

This film that was closed with "to be continues" is because this Thursday the entire movie will be broad casted. It is a movie in which many obscene words will be used.
That was the only way to have Patrick make feel at ease and have him talk "of the record".

But this Thursday, at 21:00 the movie will be broad casted in its entirety on Tele Aruba. But because we are still negotiating with Holland and the United States regarding the broadcasting rights, in which the other side of the medal will be shown, in which mr van der Eem has lured Joran into a car in order to obtain the information, which was just shown.

This Thursday it will be broad casted in a 20 minute during movie what information van der Eem was able to gather from Joran.

Finally, a video segment:

PvdE: One day he will fall on his face.
You have no idea what his other relatives are doing. I will make sure that their entire lives become bitter. I have more then 120 sms messages in my possession.

PC: How do we know that this is not a trick between you and Joran?

PvdE: When you come to Holland I will show you something, haha. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Observer on March 06, 2008, 02:45:53 PM
Amigoe.com, 20 julie 2005
Van der Straten sounded for police Bonaire(Translation)

Friday is the last working day of Commissioner Jan van der Straten. The Police confirmed that he was approached by the Antillean Justice Minister David Dick (PAR) to Bonaire to work. Or he addresses this request van der Straten not say. "I go to talk to him."

Van der Straten departs next week for a vacation to Ireland. Perhaps then the Commissioner of Police at the Bonaire are going to work.

Solving the Holloway case, Van der Straten, which until Friday still leads in this investigation, probably not. "Of course I prefer the matter resolved. The whole team had already resolved the better, I do not do it alone." According to Van der Straten take Roy Tromp Zoemers policeman and the leadership of the investigation. Van der Straten remain optimistic about solving the case of missing American. "I still assume that the matter is resolved."

http://bonaire.web-log.nl/bonaire/2005/07/van_der_straten.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: JE on March 06, 2008, 02:48:55 PM
BY JOS at BFN

summary>>

Patrick claims to be friends with Joran for years.

patrick says he knows who dumped Natalee's body in the sea. Joran supposedly has paid him to keep his mouth shut

Patrick made those remarks on Aruba TV. He thought the camera's were out.

One of the camera was still rolling. His remarks are translated by a translating company at request of magazine De Nieuwe revu.

"Since i know Joran for years...". This is in contradiction what he said before.

Patrick say he intends to continue to bother the VDS family with the knowledge he has.

One day Joran will fall on his face. You don't know what the other family membets are doing. I will make them bitter.
 
Peter's show offered new openings but the judge decided Joran could not be arrested for fantasy telling.

Who the heck pad who, that's what I want to know, since there are two translations apparently regarding this "small" detail.

yes there is confusion about that detail.
it's like different sources tried to translate the papiamentu transcript from aruba-tv and one got it wrong.

But where does this "detail" come from? it is not in the transcript of the short video that tele aruba aired.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: suisse71 on March 06, 2008, 02:50:47 PM
Just one thing in the back of my mind and that is that Joran wanted to help this "Daury" or person that helped him with Money. He mentioned this to Patrick in the tapes. Since Katrien explained that it is two people writing about one recording,I seriously doubt anything was paid to the person that helped dump Natalee and that writer is not telling the truth.

Patrick is no Dummy and I think is very street smart,he will definetly be saving interesting things so people will buy his book. Of course there are those that wish him harm and want to see him fail. I think Peter R is right,he does not know for sure who helped Joran but he has his suspicions. I will be shocked if he was told another name besides Daury but decided to keep that confidential,as that would destroy his trust with Beth,Peter and everyone else he said that he was helping. Since he mentioned he is going to bring down the VDS Family and they should move to Africa I think that is a strong hint who he thinks Daury is.MO

Hi *******,

I agree!  Think we are on the same page.  Above I asked if Klaas could post the link to that from the forum:

"Just one thing in the back of my mind and that is that Joran wanted to help this "Daury" or person that helped him with Money. He mentioned this to Patrick in the tapes."

But I feel bad asking Klaas for anything, she does so, so much as it is.  Maybe someone else here can help?

But that would be something if they actuallly had Joran on tape asking for 2000 euro to have "that guy" knocked off. Hmmmm

I am not getting my hopes up.  I  miss Arubanese - she could sure help with the Papimento, non?

j4n!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: klaasend on March 06, 2008, 02:53:00 PM
I use Windows ME...have been for many years. I cannot use FF, thanks anyway. This is the only site that I have trouble loading.

NUT - I've been having some intermittent problems the last couple days too.  I checked with Dugga and it appears to be some kind of IPS issue on my end in conjunction with this server.  If I see Dugga I'll ask him to turn off avatars again so it's faster loading.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: jackb on March 06, 2008, 02:53:56 PM
interesting reading to get the whole police chief replacement problem understood.
david dick is of course also justice minister for bonaire.

if the justice minister of the antilles is going down this is a huge scandal.


Mercelina said there was a situation in Bonaire similar to that in St. Maarten. The Netherlands will not extend the contract of Police Chief Commissioner Johan van der Straten and NAPB believes that again a Dutch replacement will be appointed.


http://www.thedailyherald.com/news/daily/k222/blow222.html

jan = short for johan
  So, that johan is pronounced YO han (is dirty.)  So we have a Dirtyhand....wonder if it isthe Dirty Hand? Someone knew his first name and may have dubbed him that.  He needs to be arrested for slandering the populace of Aruba and helping to cause a worse financial disaster than a major explosion in the region.  He needs to be placed in a cell where he can paint and photograph mocking images of the prison.  He is a terrorist to his own country and those who are trying to live the right way.    Jack b

now we have st. maarten and Bonaire without a police chief.
and antilles justice minister in very awkward position.

i keep following this st. maarten situation.
it could bring the justice minister down there. could have riple effect towards aruba.

very paranoia statement today by Economic Affairs Commissioner Maria Buncamper-Molanus.

Quote
“Perhaps this is a setup, because politicians in the Netherlands Antilles will do anything to opposing parties to get in government,” she said.

http://www.thedailyherald.com/news/daily/k247/maria247.html

very good english blog imo about corruption on st. maarten:
http://sxmprivateeye.com/node/215
many americans post there.

IF BIG MOUTH JORAN IS LUCID ENOUGH TO REMEMBER HE JUST SAID THINGS PATRICK WANTED TO HEAR, THEN HE WAS NOT DOPED UP TO WHERE HE WAS TALKING OFF THE WALL.  It makes sense he is lying now, NOT THEN.  He was not doped up enough to not remember he was "conning" Patrick.  He, the Son of a Ditch is lying, that is obvious.  The pot never affected him as he is doing it every day, and passing school, and doing the gambling game and winning at times.  The only thing it is affecting is his propensity for violence and his propensity for crime.  No one asked him to smoke dope and he should be held 100 percent liable for his choices. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: caesu on March 06, 2008, 02:56:23 PM
BY JOS at BFN

summary>>

Patrick claims to be friends with Joran for years.

patrick says he knows who dumped Natalee's body in the sea. Joran supposedly has paid him to keep his mouth shut

Patrick made those remarks on Aruba TV. He thought the camera's were out.

One of the camera was still rolling. His remarks are translated by a translating company at request of magazine De Nieuwe revu.

"Since i know Joran for years...". This is in contradiction what he said before.

Patrick say he intends to continue to bother the VDS family with the knowledge he has.

One day Joran will fall on his face. You don't know what the other family membets are doing. I will make them bitter.
 
Peter's show offered new openings but the judge decided Joran could not be arrested for fantasy telling.

Who the heck pad who, that's what I want to know, since there are two translations apparently regarding this "small" detail.

yes there is confusion about that detail.
it's like different sources tried to translate the papiamentu transcript from aruba-tv and one got it wrong.

That is what I was trying to get across to JE, that there is/are translation issues on multiple levels here.

the telegraaf article has carpe's (gensing7000) youtube links on their page by the way:

http://www.telegraaf.nl/binnenland/3487159/__Ik_weet_wie_Natalee_in_zee_gooide___.html?p=2,1

(scroll down to end of article)

seems like nieuwe revu also used those youtube clips?
those clips were put online sunday or monday??
and only now someone thinks about translating it. why didn't this news break on aruba already??

or does nieuwe revu has more transcripts additional to the youtube clips??

all this is so weird... or is nieuwe revu making the translation up and telegraad fell for that??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: klaasend on March 06, 2008, 02:56:50 PM
::MonkeyEek:: ::MonkeyEek::

Post on Gretawire blog:

"Comment by maureen in CA
March 6th, 2008 at 2:01 pm
Just got off scaredmonkeys. Within the Natalee blog, there are comments on an article re transhipment of drugs from Aruba, and there are presently 15 comments talking about Patrick van eem being secretly taped after a TV interview telling he knows who disposed of Natalee at sea and Joran asking for 2,000 euros from Patrick to have the guy who took Natalee out to sea killed. All the reports are in Dutch, and you’re only able to pick up this breaking news from the comments in English. I think something important is breaking here."


Killed???  Where did that come from?  I hope it was not Elmer Fudd!  Don't these people watch cartoons at all?


 ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyNoNo:: ::MonkeyConfused::


It never said killed anywhere LOL. Classic example of the telephone game.

Another rumour

http://misdaadjournalist.web-log.nl/misdaadjournalist/2008/02/patrick-van-d-1.html

Patrick has been in the american witness protection programm

Patrick van der Eem sat on witnesses protection program

Update 12.40 pm:

In the stories about Patrick van der Eem, Panorama and New Revu, I missed two things. One verklap I have not (is also less interesting), the other is that Patrick in a witness protection programme of America has been, but he has opened himself again. Of those 'boca grande' will have a lot to do, I do not know, my source close stores


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: katrien on March 06, 2008, 03:01:49 PM
Quote
http://www.revu.nl/10865.Ook_Van_der_Eem_stiekem_gefilmd

Dit staat in een ander draadje. Vanavond, mogelijk, want ik geloof niet helemaal zeker is de volledige uitzending. Nieuwe Revu heeft het laten vertalen, het eerste deel.

http://www.nu.nl/news/146(...)jaren_te_kennen.html

En hier op NU.nl


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Rob on March 06, 2008, 03:03:13 PM
I doubt Patrick is in any US witness protection program. He couldn't even get in to the country. Highly doubtful.

Joran is suspected of murder, and he was only briefly detained upon entry. Joran was not convicted of a crime that would prevent his entry. Patrick was.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: oceanexploration on March 06, 2008, 03:03:59 PM
We met with Patrick while in Aruba.  He said that he believed Paulus was Daury, but wouldn't come straight out and say it as if he were nervous about being recorded.  I'm uncertain why he's being cryptic about it.   


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on March 06, 2008, 03:04:36 PM
I use Windows ME...have been for many years. I cannot use FF, thanks anyway. This is the only site that I have trouble loading.

NUT - I've been having some intermittent problems the last couple days too.  I checked with Dugga and it appears to be some kind of IPS issue on my end in conjunction with this server.  If I see Dugga I'll ask him to turn off avatars again so it's faster loading.


Thank you.

Janet, I too wondered why Joran wasn't pissed off at Patrick or Peter...seemed quite unlike the Joran we know.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: JE on March 06, 2008, 03:06:43 PM
::MonkeyEek:: ::MonkeyEek::

Post on Gretawire blog:

"Comment by maureen in CA
March 6th, 2008 at 2:01 pm
Just got off scaredmonkeys. Within the Natalee blog, there are comments on an article re transhipment of drugs from Aruba, and there are presently 15 comments talking about Patrick van eem being secretly taped after a TV interview telling he knows who disposed of Natalee at sea and Joran asking for 2,000 euros from Patrick to have the guy who took Natalee out to sea killed. All the reports are in Dutch, and you’re only able to pick up this breaking news from the comments in English. I think something important is breaking here."


Killed???  Where did that come from?  I hope it was not Elmer Fudd!  Don't these people watch cartoons at all?


 ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyNoNo:: ::MonkeyConfused::


It never said killed anywhere LOL. Classic example of the telephone game.

Another rumour

http://misdaadjournalist.web-log.nl/misdaadjournalist/2008/02/patrick-van-d-1.html

Patrick has been in the american witness protection programm

Patrick van der Eem sat on witnesses protection program

Update 12.40 pm:

In the stories about Patrick van der Eem, Panorama and New Revu, I missed two things. One verklap I have not (is also less interesting), the other is that Patrick in a witness protection programme of America has been, but he has opened himself again. Of those 'boca grande' will have a lot to do, I do not know, my source close stores

In the stories about Patrick van der Eem, Panorama and New Revu, I missed two things. One i will not reveal (is also less interesting), the other is that Patrick was in the american witness protection programm, but he withdrew from the program himself. Wheter his "boca grande" has anything to do with it i dont know, my source wont say


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Rob on March 06, 2008, 03:07:44 PM
We met with Patrick while in Aruba.  He said that he believed Paulus was Daury, but wouldn't come straight out and say it as if he were nervous about being recorded.  I'm uncertain why he's being cryptic about it.   

HI OE, did you meet him to discuss the portion where Joran said he released the body into the ocean himself and the body could be located closer to shore?

If I remember correctly, the Persistence began a looksee closer to the shore after that statement.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on March 06, 2008, 03:08:00 PM
We met with Patrick while in Aruba.  He said that he believed Paulus was Daury, but wouldn't come straight out and say it as if he were nervous about being recorded.  I'm uncertain why he's being cryptic about it.   


Thanks. I figured when he said he KNEW who Daury was that he meant (like many of us) that he believes it is Paulus. Today's posts are very confusing, lol.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on March 06, 2008, 03:09:23 PM
If there was money exchanged, IMO it was between Paulus and the 'dumper'.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: katrien on March 06, 2008, 03:09:44 PM
 "
Quote
Ik vind het wel merkwaardig dat je zonder voorbehoud het verhaal van een anonieme bron als vaststaand feit meldt, terwijl daar een harde ontkenning tegenover staat. Patrick is sinds zijn 14de jaar niet meer in Amerika geweest. Hij heeft nu al jaren zijn bedrijf, zonder strafrechterlijke problemen, zonder schulden etc. Ik heb Patrick hierover gisteren gesproken en hij bezweert dat er nooit iets dergelijks heeft gespeeld. Het lijkt me ook niet goed met elkaar te rijmen dat je kennelijk een paar jaar geleden nog in een getuigenbeschermingsprogramma moet (omdat er anders voor je leven wordt gevreesd) en dat je een paar jaar later met je kop op televisie gaat en interviews aan alle media geeft, waar zelfs je woonadres in woord genoemd. Het lijkt wel of iedereen in deze zaak maar op anonieme bronnen afgaat. Wat is dat toch? Een uitvoerige bekentenis van Joran is niet genoeg, maar allerlei anonieme zegslieden worden prompt op hun woord geloofd."

Aldus Peter de Vries.


This is Peters reaction on the gossip on the website of H.J. Korterink.
He says that it does not make sence for someone who has been in a protectionprogram appearing on television and giving interviews. ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 06, 2008, 03:10:46 PM
::MonkeyEek:: ::MonkeyEek::

Post on Gretawire blog:

"Comment by maureen in CA
March 6th, 2008 at 2:01 pm
Just got off scaredmonkeys. Within the Natalee blog, there are comments on an article re transhipment of drugs from Aruba, and there are presently 15 comments talking about Patrick van eem being secretly taped after a TV interview telling he knows who disposed of Natalee at sea and Joran asking for 2,000 euros from Patrick to have the guy who took Natalee out to sea killed. All the reports are in Dutch, and you’re only able to pick up this breaking news from the comments in English. I think something important is breaking here."


Killed???  Where did that come from?  I hope it was not Elmer Fudd!  Don't these people watch cartoons at all?


 ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyNoNo:: ::MonkeyConfused::


It never said killed anywhere LOL. Classic example of the telephone game.

Another rumour

http://misdaadjournalist.web-log.nl/misdaadjournalist/2008/02/patrick-van-d-1.html

Patrick has been in the american witness protection programm

Patrick van der Eem sat on witnesses protection program

Update 12.40 pm:

In the stories about Patrick van der Eem, Panorama and New Revu, I missed two things. One verklap I have not (is also less interesting), the other is that Patrick in a witness protection programme of America has been, but he has opened himself again. Of those 'boca grande' will have a lot to do, I do not know, my source close stores

In the stories about Patrick van der Eem, Panorama and New Revu, I missed two things. One i will not reveal (is also less interesting), the other is that Patrick was in the american witness protection programm, but he withdrew from the program himself. Wheter his "boca grande" has anything to do with it i dont know, my source wont say

The fastest way to get people to ask you what you know is to tell them you won't "reveal" what you know! What did you miss that is so important that you can't share it with the cage?   ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: oceanexploration on March 06, 2008, 03:13:03 PM
By the time we began searching the shallow water (less than 70 ft) near the fisherman huts we had completed the sonar search most everywhere else.  It was only a timing issue.  Joran's taped confessions had no bearing on our search location to my understanding. 

As for Patricks recent remarks:  I could be wrong, but if he was telling the truth with us (which we believe he was) then it's nothing new that he believes Paulus is Daury.  The question becomes whether or not he can prove Paulus's connection with something court-admissable. This would perk my interest.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 06, 2008, 03:16:27 PM
By the time we began searching the shallow water (less than 70 ft) near the fisherman huts we had completed the sonar search most everywhere else.  It was only a timing issue.  Joran's taped confessions had no bearing on our search location to my understanding. 

As for Patricks recent remarks:  I could be wrong, but if he was telling the truth with us (which we believe he was) then it's nothing new that he believes Paulus is Daury.  The question becomes whether or not he can prove Paulus's connection with something court-admissable. This would perk my interest.

Those SM text messages are VERY interesting in this regard.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Observer on March 06, 2008, 03:17:46 PM
"
Quote

Aldus Peter de Vries.


This is Peters reaction on the gossip on the website of H.J. Korterink.
He says that it does not make sence for someone who has been in a protectionprogram appearing on television and giving interviews. ::MonkeyConfused::

THanks Ms. Katrien  ::MonkeyWink::


(Translation)   
I find it odd that you without reservation the story of an anonymous source as established fact replies, while a denial hard towards it. Patrick is since his 14th year no longer exists in America. He now has his company for years without criminal problems, without debts etc. I talked yesterday about Patrick and he bezweert that there never has played something similar. It seems to me also not be reconciled with each other that you apparently a few years ago in a getuigenbeschermingsprogramma must (because otherwise it is feared for your life) and that a few years later with your head on television, and interviews with all media shows, where even your home address in words. It seems as if everyone in this case but reliance on anonymous sources. What is the cause of it? A detailed confession of Joran is not enough, but all sorts of anonymous zegslieden be prompt on their word believed. "

Thus Peter de Vries.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 06, 2008, 03:19:25 PM
Amigoe.com, 20 julie 2005
Van der Straten sounded for police Bonaire(Translation)

Friday is the last working day of Commissioner Jan van der Straten. The Police confirmed that he was approached by the Antillean Justice Minister David Dick (PAR) to Bonaire to work. Or he addresses this request van der Straten not say. "I go to talk to him."

Van der Straten departs next week for a vacation to Ireland. Perhaps then the Commissioner of Police at the Bonaire are going to work.

Solving the Holloway case, Van der Straten, which until Friday still leads in this investigation, probably not. "Of course I prefer the matter resolved. The whole team had already resolved the better, I do not do it alone." According to Van der Straten take Roy Tromp Zoemers policeman and the leadership of the investigation. Van der Straten remain optimistic about solving the case of missing American. "I still assume that the matter is resolved."

http://bonaire.web-log.nl/bonaire/2005/07/van_der_straten.html

... and I have a bridge I want to sell.

Janet

+++++++++++

Jug Twitty
NANCY GRACE
October 4, 2005


JUG TWITTY: Nancy, what happened -- well, I think it was probably about 30 days after, or so, maybe the 1st of July or something. I had a meeting with Van Der Straaten, who was the police chief in charge at that time. And I went in and sat down with him and told him and Officer Sanboe (ph), who was going to take over for Van Der Straaten. He was there, too.

You know, I asked a question about, I understand that there was a statement made by Joran, where he talks about what he had done to Natalee and he described in very graphic detail, like, the stitching and embroidery and everything on Natalee`s underwear. And he goes, Oh, no, no, no. Absolutely not. Absolutely not. Well, little did he know I had just read the statements where Joran describes that to the "T," you know, two days before. But of course, I didn`t tell him that. But that`s just when I started to think something`s wrong here.


Joran van der Sloot
Suspect Statement
June 9, 2005


To your question as to what panty Natalee was wearing, I answer you the following. Natalee wore a dark blue panty. According to me they were embroidered panties and according to me these were flowers.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 06, 2008, 03:20:37 PM
What anonymous sources is he talking about?


Also, what does everyone think of this:

PC: what is your e-mail address?

PvdE: p(beep beep)@planet.nl, that correct, but, no, see…. The police talked to them and they have a lot of things.. and I have a lot of things

PC: bring a towel for me.. Let me tell you something, I am involucrated in this thing but I never did like this (inaudible) I have information that the police have and never used. I will aired it in this show.  

PvdE: what kind of information? About him, Joran?

PC:No, about what also could have happen to Natalee Holloway and nobody bother to use this information. And this will I show this day, information that is..,..how old is this situation 3 years? The information is 2.5 have nearly 3 years old. Not that I want….., I don’t say he didn’t (inaudible) ….until this case is closed every possibility must remain open.



Is this BS talk to try an get Patrick to talk?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 06, 2008, 03:24:59 PM
We met with Patrick while in Aruba.  He said that he believed Paulus was Daury, but wouldn't come straight out and say it as if he were nervous about being recorded.  I'm uncertain why he's being cryptic about it.   

 ::MonkeyShocked::

Patrick's mouth implies he had been be looking over his shoulder.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Observer on March 06, 2008, 03:25:56 PM
Tamikosmom:

Jug and Dave say the same thing about Johan Van Der Straten. We heard them both in the last couple of month's say they saw the same info/files as him but yet he denies it as true and was obviously protecting his good friend Paul Van Der Sloot and his Son. What is this guy going to do for work now? He thinks of himself as a protector for the Antilles,so this will be very interesting to see where he winds up.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Rob on March 06, 2008, 03:30:20 PM
In my opinion, Paulus Octavius Tiberius Augustus Petrus Caligula Van Der Sloot should be the number one person investigated. Always has been. No one seems to want to do it.

As John Edwards would say ~ Whhhhhyyyy?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: JE on March 06, 2008, 03:33:11 PM
What anonymous sources is he talking about?


Also, what does everyone think of this:

PC: what is your e-mail address?

PvdE: p(beep beep)@planet.nl, that correct, but, no, see…. The police talked to them and they have a lot of things.. and I have a lot of things
PC: bring a towel for me.. Let me tell you something, I am involucrated in this thing but I never did like this (inaudible) I have information that the police have and never used. I will aired it in this show.  

PvdE: what kind of information? About him, Joran?

PC:No, about what also could have happen to Natalee Holloway and nobody bother to use this information. And this will I show this day, information that is..,..how old is this situation 3 years? The information is 2.5 have nearly 3 years old. Not that I want….., I don’t say he didn’t (inaudible) ….until this case is closed every possibility must remain open.



Is this BS talk to try an get Patrick to talk?

That s not what s in the transcript

PRESENTATOR: Wat is je e-mail?
PATRICK P******@planet.nl
PRESENTATOR: Ok.

PATRICK Goed, maar de informatieuitwisseling met de politie was goed verlopen en ze
hebben veel informatie tot hun beschikking,……(onderbreking),..exchanging information with the police went well they have lots of information
PRESENTATOR: neem mijn biertje voor me mee.   bring me a beer
PRESENTATOR: Ja he,..Patrick ik zal je wat vertellen,..ik ben in deze zaak gerold, maar
de zaak beviel me niet.,….. Yes Patrick i sort of rolled into this case but i did not like it
PRESENTATOR: Als je wilt, kan je je gezicht hiermee afdrogen,.. If you want you can use this to dry your face
PATRICK Nee, nee,.ga je gang maar,….ik ga zo direct weg,.. No no go ahead i must be going soon
PRESENTATOR: En uhm,..van alle informatie die ze tot hun beschikking hebben, werd er
amper gebruik van gemaakt. They hardly used the information they had
PATRICK Van Joran? of joran?
PRESENTATOR: Nee, ….wat er met Natalee is gebeurd en waar niemand zich druk om
maakt. no about what happened to natalee and about which noone seems to care
PRESENTATOR: Informatie die dus wellicht nuttig is,…..hoe lang loop deze zaak al?
Drie jaar? Nou dan,…het zeker zo’n tweeënhalf, misschien bijna drie jaar oud. Information that may be useful... how long has this case been going on two and a half three years?
PATRICK Ja,…in mei is het drie jaar hoor. Yes in may its 3 years
PRESENTATOR: Dus, het is niet zo dat ik zeg dat er niets is gebeurd, maar zolang de
rechtszaak nog loopt, laat ik alle opties open Its not that im saying nothing happened but as long as the case is not closed i leave all options open


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 06, 2008, 03:38:47 PM
What anonymous sources is he talking about?


Also, what does everyone think of this:

PC: what is your e-mail address?

PvdE: p(beep beep)@planet.nl, that correct, but, no, see…. The police talked to them and they have a lot of things.. and I have a lot of things
PC: bring a towel for me.. Let me tell you something, I am involucrated in this thing but I never did like this (inaudible) I have information that the police have and never used. I will aired it in this show.  

PvdE: what kind of information? About him, Joran?

PC:No, about what also could have happen to Natalee Holloway and nobody bother to use this information. And this will I show this day, information that is..,..how old is this situation 3 years? The information is 2.5 have nearly 3 years old. Not that I want….., I don’t say he didn’t (inaudible) ….until this case is closed every possibility must remain open.



Is this BS talk to try an get Patrick to talk?

That s not what s in the transcript

PRESENTATOR: Wat is je e-mail?
PATRICK P******@planet.nl
PRESENTATOR: Ok.

PATRICK Goed, maar de informatieuitwisseling met de politie was goed verlopen en ze
hebben veel informatie tot hun beschikking,……(onderbreking),..exchanging information with the police went well they have lots of information
PRESENTATOR: neem mijn biertje voor me mee.   bring me a beer
PRESENTATOR: Ja he,..Patrick ik zal je wat vertellen,..ik ben in deze zaak gerold, maar
de zaak beviel me niet.,….. Yes Patrick i sort of rolled into this case but i did not like it
PRESENTATOR: Als je wilt, kan je je gezicht hiermee afdrogen,.. If you want you can use this to dry your face
PATRICK Nee, nee,.ga je gang maar,….ik ga zo direct weg,.. No no go ahead i must be going soon
PRESENTATOR: En uhm,..van alle informatie die ze tot hun beschikking hebben, werd er
amper gebruik van gemaakt. They hardly used the information they had
PATRICK Van Joran? of joran?
PRESENTATOR: Nee, ….wat er met Natalee is gebeurd en waar niemand zich druk om
maakt. no about what happened to natalee and about which noone seems to care
PRESENTATOR: Informatie die dus wellicht nuttig is,…..hoe lang loop deze zaak al?
Drie jaar? Nou dan,…het zeker zo’n tweeënhalf, misschien bijna drie jaar oud. Information that may be useful... how long has this case been going on two and a half three years?
PATRICK Ja,…in mei is het drie jaar hoor. Yes in may its 3 years
PRESENTATOR: Dus, het is niet zo dat ik zeg dat er niets is gebeurd, maar zolang de
rechtszaak nog loopt, laat ik alle opties open Its not that im saying nothing happened but as long as the case is not closed i leave all options open
Thanks JE that is much clearer? Thanks a lot.   


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Jo-An on March 06, 2008, 03:39:50 PM
Also very interesting from those transcripts:

Patrick asks Poentje: "So where do you think it happened: at the beach OR AT HOME?"


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: JE on March 06, 2008, 03:40:07 PM
@bladerunner

YW


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 06, 2008, 03:45:03 PM
What anonymous sources is he talking about?


Also, what does everyone think of this:

PC: what is your e-mail address?

PvdE: p(beep beep)@planet.nl, that correct, but, no, see…. The police talked to them and they have a lot of things.. and I have a lot of things

PC: bring a towel for me.. Let me tell you something, I am involucrated in this thing but I never did like this (inaudible) I have information that the police have and never used. I will aired it in this show.  

PvdE: what kind of information? About him, Joran?

PC:No, about what also could have happen to Natalee Holloway and nobody bother to use this information. And this will I show this day, information that is..,..how old is this situation 3 years? The information is 2.5 have nearly 3 years old. Not that I want….., I don’t say he didn’t (inaudible) ….until this case is closed every possibility must remain open.



Is this BS talk to try an get Patrick to talk?


It's working.  Patrick has some very serious issues in regards to discretion ... self-esteen.  He will reveal all to whoever asks and ... he is undoing all the good he has done in cause of justice for Natalee Holloway.

Patrick should be documenting everything ... accumulating all recorded evidence ... having it notarized and ... giving a copy to the FBI.

Janet

++++++++++

“Silence is a source of great strength.”
Lao Tzu

“Do not speak unless you can improve the silence”
Proverb

“There are times when silence has the loudest voice”[/b
]Leroy Brownlow


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: oceanexploration on March 06, 2008, 03:47:51 PM
Here's a theory:

Once this case is solved, Hans Mos will use the victory and the subsequent shift in power/government to make a run for Prime Minister.   


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Observer on March 06, 2008, 03:49:10 PM
In my opinion, Paulus Octavius Tiberius Augustus Petrus Caligula Van Der Sloot should be the number one person investigated. Always has been. No one seems to want to do it.

As John Edwards would say ~ Whhhhhyyyy?

Him and his son said they refuse to speak to the Police anymore,but yet they both say they will tell more at there choosing. PVDS says he would tell more but it would hurt too many people. I wonder what Peter R thinks of that since he was the one that PVDS told that to? Obviously the KLPD and ALE have no intentions on questioning any of the initial Investigators or PVDS no matter how many lies they are caught in. Why is a great question?



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Peaches on March 06, 2008, 03:52:59 PM
This is exactly what the other side wants is to not find Patrick credible and have him contradict himself. Also in order for him to sell many copies of his book he will need something juicy inside of it like who he thinks dumped Natalee in the ocean. If he already knows and was told another name besides Daury then he has some explaining to do.MO

Joran is simply trying to pull the crime away from "Daury" (daddy) by making it look like it is someone who he has to pay to keep quiet.  He may have been a bit paranoid that day and realized he was talking too much.  As for Patrick knowing who threw the body into the ocean, he may be like us using his best information to form an opinion about who it is.    Jack b

This is my impression as well.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: dennisintn on March 06, 2008, 03:53:02 PM
::MonkeyEek:: ::MonkeyEek::

Post on Gretawire blog:

"Comment by maureen in CA
March 6th, 2008 at 2:01 pm
Just got off scaredmonkeys. Within the Natalee blog, there are comments on an article re transhipment of drugs from Aruba, and there are presently 15 comments talking about Patrick van eem being secretly taped after a TV interview telling he knows who disposed of Natalee at sea and Joran asking for 2,000 euros from Patrick to have the guy who took Natalee out to sea killed. All the reports are in Dutch, and you’re only able to pick up this breaking news from the comments in English. I think something important is breaking here."


Killed???  Where did that come from?  I hope it was not Elmer Fudd!  Don't these people watch cartoons at all?


 ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyNoNo:: ::MonkeyConfused::


It never said killed anywhere LOL. Classic example of the telephone game.

Another rumour

http://misdaadjournalist.web-log.nl/misdaadjournalist/2008/02/patrick-van-d-1.html

Patrick has been in the american witness protection programm

roflmfao, i'll bet that american witness protection program was a little hard to arrange since the man can't even get a visitors visa to enter the country. 
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: hotping on March 06, 2008, 03:55:20 PM
Here's a theory:

Once this case is solved, Hans Mos will use the victory and the subsequent shift in power/government to make a run for Prime Minister.   
Do You believe that it will be solved? If Hans Mos can get this case solved He deserves to be PM....JMO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Observer on March 06, 2008, 03:56:01 PM
Here's a theory:

Once this case is solved, Hans Mos will use the victory and the subsequent shift in power/government to make a run for Prime Minister.   

 ::MonkeyEek:: PM of Holland? As far as Aruban politics the MEP is already planting seeds bashing the AVP in prep for next years elections. This was a AD run in Solo Di Pueblo this week.

(http://i198.photobucket.com/albums/aa118/Observer00000007/absolutecorr.jpg)





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: caesu on March 06, 2008, 03:56:37 PM
What anonymous sources is he talking about?


Also, what does everyone think of this:

PC: what is your e-mail address?

PvdE: p(beep beep)@planet.nl, that correct, but, no, see…. The police talked to them and they have a lot of things.. and I have a lot of things

PC: bring a towel for me.. Let me tell you something, I am involucrated in this thing but I never did like this (inaudible) I have information that the police have and never used. I will aired it in this show.  

PvdE: what kind of information? About him, Joran?

PC:No, about what also could have happen to Natalee Holloway and nobody bother to use this information. And this will I show this day, information that is..,..how old is this situation 3 years? The information is 2.5 have nearly 3 years old. Not that I want….., I don’t say he didn’t (inaudible) ….until this case is closed every possibility must remain open.



Is this BS talk to try an get Patrick to talk?

i am reading it here in dutch.
PC is not saying that he himself has information.

http://www.revu.nl/media/2176.pdf

in the revu there is nothing about 2000 euro.
i don't know where the telegraaf has this from. maybe directly from tele aruba?

revu also uses carpe's uploaded youtube clips.
this was broadcast on sunday. patrick must have known this was broadcast of course.
and still he goes on Jensen yesterday (was taped tuesday).

so i think this whole revu-thing is one big mistranslation out of context hoax.
other media like telegraaf copies revu and spices it up a bit more.

it also says tele aruba is in negotiation with dutch and american media about broadcasting rights.
but i doubt they will find a dutch tv channel to broadcast it. maybe a website like revu.

but we have to see what tonights broadcast brings.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: oceanexploration on March 06, 2008, 03:57:01 PM
Here's a theory:

Once this case is solved, Hans Mos will use the victory and the subsequent shift in power/government to make a run for Prime Minister.   
Do You believe that it will be solved? If Hans Mos can get this case solved He deserves to be PM....JMO

I believe it's a little better than a coin flip at this point.  If my opinion changes I will let you know. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: JE on March 06, 2008, 03:57:51 PM
another intriguing passage

PRESENTATOR: Ja maar,..weet je wat het is,..ik heb het gevoel dat als je met iemand aan
het praten bent, alle energie van die persoon naar je toe wordt getrokken. En jij hebt
met deze jongen gewoond. Hij is dus nog spiritueel in je aanwezig en daardoor heb ik
het gevoel dat ik aan mezelf ga twijfelen als ik met je aan het praten ben. Ik voel dus
dat jij mij onzeker maakt. Een gevoel dat ik nooit eerder heb ervaren. Wat ik op
televisie zag was een ongelooflijk rollenspel. Hij had je gewoon door. Hij wist dat je
op zoek was naar informatie en speelde daar listig op in om zo de afgesloten deal te
realiseren. En op het moment dat je denkt dat je de enige bent met de vergaarde
informatie, is de inhoud elders al anders verwoord. Ook als ik nu tegen je aan het
praten bent, heb ik het gevoel dat *** *** **, begrijp je wat ik bedoel?

Yes but,... you know what it is i feel that when you re talking to someone, all of that persons energy is drawn towards oneself. And you have lived with this boy. He is spiritualy still present in you and that makes me start doubting myself when i talk to you. I feel you make me uneasy. A feeling i ve never had before. What i saw on tv was unbelievable role playing. He was on to you. He knew you were looking for information and cleverly anticipated on that to realize the deal that was made. And the moment you think you re the only one with the information, the content of that information has already been voiced differently elsewhere. Even now as we speak i feel that *** *** ** Dou you get what i mean?



PATRICK Ja,..maar kijk,.. aangezien ik hem al zoveel jaren ken, kon ik het niet
opbrengen om met mezelf te leven, terwijl ik wist dat hij hierin betrokken was en
gewoon het gevoel had dat ik iets moest doen. Snap je? Hij had gewoon behoefte om
zijn stem te laten horen en daar heb ik gebruik van gemaakt. Zeven maanden lang.
Bij de tweede keer dat ze hem hadden opgezocht kon ik de meeste informatie
vergaren.

Yes... but look... since i have know him so many years i couldnt live with myself knowing he was involved and i felt i had to do something. you understand? He had a need to make his voice heard and i took advantage of that. For seven months. After the second time they looked him up* i got most of the information

* I think he means arrested here



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on March 06, 2008, 03:58:11 PM
2000 Euros = 3043.2 U.S. dollars



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Rob on March 06, 2008, 03:58:49 PM
Here's a theory:

Once this case is solved, Hans Mos will use the victory and the subsequent shift in power/government to make a run for Prime Minister.   

 ::MonkeyEek:: PM of Holland? As far as Aruban politics the MEP is already planting seeds bashing the AVP in prep for next years elections. This was a AD run in Solo Di Pueblo this week.

(http://i198.photobucket.com/albums/aa118/Observer00000007/absolutecorr.jpg)





Those idiots in the MEP need to step back from the Balashi. Kettle Black


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: hotping on March 06, 2008, 04:00:36 PM
Here's a theory:

Once this case is solved, Hans Mos will use the victory and the subsequent shift in power/government to make a run for Prime Minister.   
Do You believe that it will be solved? If Hans Mos can get this case solved He deserves to be PM....JMO

I believe it's a little better than a coin flip at this point.  If my opinion changes I will let you know. 
I respect Your Opinion...Thanks for letting Me know...  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Rob on March 06, 2008, 04:01:16 PM
OE, many here believe the case is SOLVED. It just has not been prosecuted. And the Aruban Prosecutors office keeps saying that they can do anything without a body even though we all know Joran has confessed now twice.

it's pathetic.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 06, 2008, 04:01:52 PM
What anonymous sources is he talking about?


Also, what does everyone think of this:

PC: what is your e-mail address?

PvdE: p(beep beep)@planet.nl, that correct, but, no, see…. The police talked to them and they have a lot of things.. and I have a lot of things

PC: bring a towel for me.. Let me tell you something, I am involucrated in this thing but I never did like this (inaudible) I have information that the police have and never used. I will aired it in this show.  

PvdE: what kind of information? About him, Joran?

PC:No, about what also could have happen to Natalee Holloway and nobody bother to use this information. And this will I show this day, information that is..,..how old is this situation 3 years? The information is 2.5 have nearly 3 years old. Not that I want….., I don’t say he didn’t (inaudible) ….until this case is closed every possibility must remain open.



Is this BS talk to try an get Patrick to talk?

i am reading it here in dutch.
PC is not saying that he himself has information.

http://www.revu.nl/media/2176.pdf

in the revu there is nothing about 2000 euro.
i don't know where the telegraaf has this from. maybe directly from tele aruba?

revu also uses carpe's uploaded youtube clips.
this was broadcast on sunday. patrick must have known this was broadcast of course.
and still he goes on Jensen yesterday (was taped tuesday).

so i think this whole revu-thing is one big mistranslation out of context hoax.
other media like telegraaf copies revu and spices it up a bit more.

it also says tele aruba is in negotiation with dutch and american media about broadcasting rights.
but i doubt they will find a dutch tv channel to broadcast it. maybe a website like revu.

but we have to see what tonights broadcast brings.

I think yo are exactly right, and all this BS will lead back to the same old place---Joran and Duary (Daddy).


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 06, 2008, 04:03:40 PM
another intriguing passage

PRESENTATOR: Ja maar,..weet je wat het is,..ik heb het gevoel dat als je met iemand aan
het praten bent, alle energie van die persoon naar je toe wordt getrokken. En jij hebt
met deze jongen gewoond. Hij is dus nog spiritueel in je aanwezig en daardoor heb ik
het gevoel dat ik aan mezelf ga twijfelen als ik met je aan het praten ben. Ik voel dus
dat jij mij onzeker maakt. Een gevoel dat ik nooit eerder heb ervaren. Wat ik op
televisie zag was een ongelooflijk rollenspel. Hij had je gewoon door. Hij wist dat je
op zoek was naar informatie en speelde daar listig op in om zo de afgesloten deal te
realiseren. En op het moment dat je denkt dat je de enige bent met de vergaarde
informatie, is de inhoud elders al anders verwoord. Ook als ik nu tegen je aan het
praten bent, heb ik het gevoel dat *** *** **, begrijp je wat ik bedoel?

Yes but,... you know what it is i feel that when you re talking to someone, all of that persons energy is drawn towards oneself. And you have lived with this boy. He is spiritualy still present in you and that makes me start doubting myself when i talk to you. I feel you make me uneasy. A feeling i ve never had before. What i saw on tv was unbelievable role playing. He was on to you. He knew you were looking for information and cleverly anticipated on that to realize the deal that was made. And the moment you think you re the only one with the information, the content of that information has already been voiced differently elsewhere. Even now as we speak i feel that *** *** ** Dou you get what i mean?



PATRICK Ja,..maar kijk,.. aangezien ik hem al zoveel jaren ken, kon ik het niet
opbrengen om met mezelf te leven, terwijl ik wist dat hij hierin betrokken was en
gewoon het gevoel had dat ik iets moest doen. Snap je? Hij had gewoon behoefte om
zijn stem te laten horen en daar heb ik gebruik van gemaakt. Zeven maanden lang.
Bij de tweede keer dat ze hem hadden opgezocht kon ik de meeste informatie
vergaren.

Yes... but look... since i have know him so many years i couldnt live with myself knowing he was involved and i felt i had to do something. you understand? He had a need to make his voice heard and i took advantage of that. For seven months. After the second time they looked him up* i got most of the information

* I think he means arrested here



Thanks JE.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: oceanexploration on March 06, 2008, 04:05:30 PM
OE, many here believe the case is SOLVED. It just has not been prosecuted. And the Aruban Prosecutors office keeps saying that they can do anything without a body even though we all know Joran has confessed now twice.

it's pathetic.

Yeah, but he only confessed twice.  Perhaps third time's the charm??   ::MonkeyNoNo::

You got my point.  I meant the successful prosecution of all involved.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Anna on March 06, 2008, 04:13:26 PM

I think yo are exactly right, and all this BS will lead back to the same old place---Joran and Duary (Daddy).


Never fails, Bladerunner, it always does.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: JE on March 06, 2008, 04:19:46 PM
PRESENTATOR: Je bedoelt toen ze hem hadden aangehouden?
You mean when they arrested him
PATRICK Nee, ze hadden hem een keertje opgezocht en opgesloten, maar ik was in
Nederland terwijl ik aan de zaak aan het werken was. Het was op een woensdag en we
zouden op maandag ermee beginnen.
No they visited him at a time and locked him up, but i was in the Neterlands while i was working on the case.
It was on a wednesday and we were to start on monday

PRESENTATOR: Oh, ja, ja,..
Oh yea yea
PATRICK Ik heb zelfs alles bedacht, hoe de omgeving moest worden ingericht met
microfoontjes en planten. Van verscholen mini-cameraatjes in planten tot zelfs de
internet- en telefoonverbinding die afgetapt waren. Maar ik zal je wat vertellen; hij
geeft heel veel geld uit.
I thought of it all myself, how to set up the surroundings with microphones and plants. From hidden mini cameras in plants up to the wire tap on the phone and the intenetconnection. But i ll tell you something he spends an awful lot of money
PRESENTATOR: Welke partijen zijn hierin betrokken als het komt op uitbetalingen.
which parties are involved when it comes to payements
PATRICK Dat zeg ik je wel,.. ik geef beide partijen hetzelfde, maar het is een grote
groep. De pers krijgt wat maar ook de betrokken politie-agenten. Kijk, als er zich
een probleem voordoet van een dergelijk magnitude op Aruba, dan gaan mensen een
andere beeldvorming van hem krijgen, omdat wat hij allemaal zegt gewoon
ongelooflijk is.
I ll tell you... I give both parties the same but it is a big group. The press gets some but also the police officers involved. Look if a problem of that magnitude happens in aruba people will get a different image of him, because all that he says is just unbelieveable
PRESENTATOR: Ja, het zal zich blijven herhalen.
yes it will repeat itself
PATRICK Ja, en de hele beeldvorming van hem zal dus nog erger worden.
yes and the whole image of him will get worse
PATRICK Ik zal je iets zeggen,..er is iets vreemds gaande met het verhaal over die
andere jongens.
I ll tell you something... there is something strange going on with the story about the other boys
PATRICK Maar ik weet wie het lichaam in zee heeft gegooid.
But i know who threw the body into the ocean

end of transcript


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Observer on March 06, 2008, 04:25:21 PM
Thanks JE!

I ll tell you something... there is something strange going on with the story about the other boys
PATRICK Maar ik weet wie het lichaam in zee heeft gegooid.
But i know who threw the body into the ocean

end of transcript

As we say here in America a cliffhanger  ::MonkeyNoNo:: Will this be continued in his book? Most likely if he wants to be a best seller and make his million!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: JE on March 06, 2008, 04:28:24 PM
Thanks JE!

I ll tell you something... there is something strange going on with the story about the other boys
PATRICK Maar ik weet wie het lichaam in zee heeft gegooid.
But i know who threw the body into the ocean

end of transcript

As we say here in America a cliffhanger  ::MonkeyNoNo:: Will this be continued in his book? Most likely if he wants to be a best seller!

they say that the rest will be shown today on tele aruba

i found the payement bit interesting.
Someone paying the media and the cops?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on March 06, 2008, 04:28:29 PM
Tamikosmom:

Jug and Dave say the same thing about Johan Van Der Straten. We heard them both in the last couple of month's say they saw the same info/files as him but yet he denies it as true and was obviously protecting his good friend Paul Van Der Sloot and his Son. What is this guy going to do for work now? He thinks of himself as a protector for the Antilles,so this will be very interesting to see where he winds up.



Hope he ends up in the garbage wherever that is for him.Underneath the kitchen sink probably!!! ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: jackb on March 06, 2008, 04:29:05 PM
In my opinion, Paulus Octavius Tiberius Augustus Petrus Caligula Van Der Sloot should be the number one person investigated. Always has been. No one seems to want to do it.

As John Edwards would say ~ Whhhhhyyyy?

Because Palus has sloot (chit) on the others.  It may or may not be related to the Holloway case.  This is not the first crimes the den has committed or their children I am sure.  Palus has stuff hidden away on them to be opened if something happens to him and/or his family.  They all have enough on each other to never see daylight again and it is not just crimes in Aruba.  They have sloot that is international to say the least and are blackmailing each other with their involvement in this or that.  I think they should all be exterminated like the vermin they are.  Van der Stratten in my book is the biggest hipocrit of all as he was supposed to represent law and order and uprightness.  When monsters like that are in power it drains the economy and moral of a town, county, state or country.  They should not stay on the job but for a 5 year or so period and be replaced by someone not of their choosing, but someone who could have no stake in serving criminals and/or the injust.  They are all thugs.  Nothing could help the Aruban country more than to have a thorough cleansing.  If not, then it will all mesh back together with the same crimes on different faces backed by the people who are not showing to be in power.      jackb


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Kiwi on March 06, 2008, 04:30:43 PM
Good afternoon all- I noticed something in the phone interview with Joran prior to the Sunday nite video release. About halfway down the interviewer caught Joran off guard with- did you call the boy who helped remove the body that night? At first he says Yes then no followed by a covering sentence. Too bad there wasn't a bug planted to find out who Joran actually called once he learned of the recordings. I guess he wasn't 100% clear if he had given up the actual name that moment while answering the question.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Rob on March 06, 2008, 04:33:10 PM
PATRICK Maar ik weet wie het lichaam in zee heeft gegooid.
But i know who threw the body into the ocean
.

I contend that IF this is correct and Patrick did say that, it's a huge development and he needs to be interrogated throughly and immediately.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Rob on March 06, 2008, 04:35:05 PM
Thanks JE!

I ll tell you something... there is something strange going on with the story about the other boys
PATRICK Maar ik weet wie het lichaam in zee heeft gegooid.
But i know who threw the body into the ocean

end of transcript

As we say here in America a cliffhanger  ::MonkeyNoNo:: Will this be continued in his book? Most likely if he wants to be a best seller!

they say that the rest will be shown today on tele aruba

i found the payement bit interesting.
Someone paying the media and the cops?

JE -
my guess would be AHATA and ATA. The usual suspects.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Flipper/Donnie29 on March 06, 2008, 04:37:02 PM
On sbs a Dutch channel.. there is news about Patrick, and they are now saying its all a misunderstanding.. the part about Patrick telling the interviewer that he knows who drove the boat.. So a wrong translation is what they say now..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Rob on March 06, 2008, 04:39:37 PM
In my opinion, Paulus Octavius Tiberius Augustus Petrus Caligula Van Der Sloot should be the number one person investigated. Always has been. No one seems to want to do it.

As John Edwards would say ~ Whhhhhyyyy?

Because Palus has sloot (chit) on the others.  It may or may not be related to the Holloway case.  This is not the first crimes the den has committed or their children I am sure.  Palus has stuff hidden away on them to be opened if something happens to him and/or his family.  They all have enough on each other to never see daylight again and it is not just crimes in Aruba.  They have sloot that is international to say the least and are blackmailing each other with their involvement in this or that.  I think they should all be exterminated like the vermin they are.  Van der Stratten in my book is the biggest hipocrit of all as he was supposed to represent law and order and uprightness.  When monsters like that are in power it drains the economy and moral of a town, county, state or country.  They should not stay on the job but for a 5 year or so period and be replaced by someone not of their choosing, but someone who could have no stake in serving criminals and/or the injust.  They are all thugs.  Nothing could help the Aruban country more than to have a thorough cleansing.  If not, then it will all mesh back together with the same crimes on different faces backed by the people who are not showing to be in power.      jackb

Jack, it's often said that Sloot has "stuff" on others. But who? Alex Mathews has stuff on him, not the other way around. Sloot locked away evidence that exonerated Mathews in his desk drawer. Sloot appears guilty of obstruction in that case.

But, seriously, who does Sloot have anything on?

Other than him being in the position to know that Oduber's kid was involved in a sexual assault of a maid or a former girlfriend, I really know of know instances where he really has anything on anyone.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Jo-An on March 06, 2008, 04:40:54 PM
PATRICK Maar ik weet wie het lichaam in zee heeft gegooid.
But i know who threw the body into the ocean
.

I contend that IF this is correct and Patrick did say that, it's a huge development and he needs to be interrogated throughly and immediately.

There was a little interview with PRDV on tv just now, he says it's not true. If it were true, Peter would have known about it (from the tapes) too and they would have done something with that information immediately.
He also said about Patrick and Joran knowing each other for years that that was either a translation error or Patrick doesn't speak fluent Papiamentu.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: hotping on March 06, 2008, 04:41:19 PM
PATRICK Maar ik weet wie het lichaam in zee heeft gegooid.
But i know who threw the body into the ocean
.

I contend that IF this is correct and Patrick did say that, it's a huge development and he needs to be interrogated throughly and immediately.
Who's to say that Patrick has not given a statement....We just don't know what He said in it .....seems like in the last week or so He went to see Mos.....correct me if I'm wrong ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: JE on March 06, 2008, 04:41:58 PM
PATRICK Maar ik weet wie het lichaam in zee heeft gegooid.
But i know who threw the body into the ocean
.

I contend that IF this is correct and Patrick did say that, it's a huge development and he needs to be interrogated throughly and immediately.

trust me it is the correct translation
But it could also mean that he is sure in his own mind that he knows who did it it does not necessarily mean he has proof


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Tater on March 06, 2008, 04:43:46 PM
In my opinion, Paulus Octavius Tiberius Augustus Petrus Caligula Van Der Sloot should be the number one person investigated. Always has been. No one seems to want to do it.

As John Edwards would say ~ Whhhhhyyyy?


Creeps me out reading all of his alter's names.. ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: GBMW on March 06, 2008, 04:44:31 PM
Peter R. de Vries was just in 'Hart van Nederland'. Again stating it's all nonsense. But again only about dumping the body & the time Patrick & Joran know each other.
Peter said that if Patrick knew who dumped the body; he would know also. In a way like: if he knew; why wouldn't he tell me & keep it to himself?
Peter also mentioned that it's probably about the translation.
And: 2 people at SBS6 know Papiamento and couldn't really make out what Patrick was saying...so they couldn't translate either...

Nieuwe Revu will check the translation again....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 06, 2008, 04:44:47 PM
PATRICK Maar ik weet wie het lichaam in zee heeft gegooid.
But i know who threw the body into the ocean
.

I contend that IF this is correct and Patrick did say that, it's a huge development and he needs to be interrogated throughly and immediately.

trust me it is the correct translation
But it could also mean that he is sure in his own mind that he knows who did it it does not necessarily mean he has proof

Precisely, and this is where body language, tone, context, etc. helps tell exactly what was communicated about this.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: JE on March 06, 2008, 04:47:23 PM
Good afternoon all- I noticed something in the phone interview with Joran prior to the Sunday nite video release. About halfway down the interviewer caught Joran off guard with- did you call the boy who helped remove the body that night? At first he says Yes then no followed by a covering sentence. Too bad there wasn't a bug planted to find out who Joran actually called once he learned of the recordings. I guess he wasn't 100% clear if he had given up the actual name that moment while answering the question.

I just listen to it again and he answers:
yes...euh...no, and the worst part is that it is a boy i met the last time i was in aruba....

This would be consistant with Daury rodriguez. except that he does not say daury rodriguez on the tape. If you look at his lips during the part that was beeped away he says something like Davis or Dewit (lipreaders help plz). Also patrick asks him "a dutch guy?" Not a question you would ask with a name like rodriguez


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: jackb on March 06, 2008, 04:48:35 PM
In my opinion, Paulus Octavius Tiberius Augustus Petrus Caligula Van Der Sloot should be the number one person investigated. Always has been. No one seems to want to do it.

As John Edwards would say ~ Whhhhhyyyy?

Because Palus has sloot (chit) on the others.  It may or may not be related to the Holloway case.  This is not the first crimes the den has committed or their children I am sure.  Palus has stuff hidden away on them to be opened if something happens to him and/or his family.  They all have enough on each other to never see daylight again and it is not just crimes in Aruba.  They have sloot that is international to say the least and are blackmailing each other with their involvement in this or that.  I think they should all be exterminated like the vermin they are.  Van der Stratten in my book is the biggest hipocrit of all as he was supposed to represent law and order and uprightness.  When monsters like that are in power it drains the economy and moral of a town, county, state or country.  They should not stay on the job but for a 5 year or so period and be replaced by someone not of their choosing, but someone who could have no stake in serving criminals and/or the injust.  They are all thugs.  Nothing could help the Aruban country more than to have a thorough cleansing.  If not, then it will all mesh back together with the same crimes on different faces backed by the people who are not showing to be in power.      jackb

Jack, it's often said that Sloot has "stuff" on others. But who? Alex Mathews has stuff on him, not the other way around. Sloot locked away evidence that exonerated Mathews in his desk drawer. Sloot appears guilty of obstruction in that case.

But, seriously, who does Sloot have anything on?

Other than him being in the position to know that Oduber's kid was involved in a sexual assault of a maid or a former girlfriend, I really know of know instances where he really has anything on anyone.

I do not believe those people have sould enough to love anyone enough to risk their jobs, lives and this international stink for.  No one would love the Sloots enough to cover for them without their own hides being at risk if they did otherwise.  Joran was not a lovable kid according to what I am hearing.  Now who, out of the love of Joran and Palus would go to such lengths to cover for them out of love?      Jackb


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: dennisintn on March 06, 2008, 04:49:25 PM
Thanks JE!

I ll tell you something... there is something strange going on with the story about the other boys
PATRICK Maar ik weet wie het lichaam in zee heeft gegooid.
But i know who threw the body into the ocean

end of transcript

As we say here in America a cliffhanger  ::MonkeyNoNo:: Will this be continued in his book? Most likely if he wants to be a best seller!

they say that the rest will be shown today on tele aruba

i found the payement bit interesting.
Someone paying the media and the cops?

to the cops and the press, i thought he meant information that patrick himself was giving.  jmo, and translations of translations are not my forte.
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Rob on March 06, 2008, 04:50:30 PM
PATRICK Maar ik weet wie het lichaam in zee heeft gegooid.
But i know who threw the body into the ocean
.

I contend that IF this is correct and Patrick did say that, it's a huge development and he needs to be interrogated throughly and immediately.

trust me it is the correct translation
But it could also mean that he is sure in his own mind that he knows who did it it does not necessarily mean he has proof

thanks JE
I trust you are correct. If Patrick has knowledge of what possibly occurred, he needs to explain himself. In my opinion, he has made a statement that he knows something. Now, he needs to explain it to the Authorities.

P.S. I expected someone to say it was a translation problem. We have heard that one before too...lmao ::MonkeyHaHa::

Hotping, right he did give a statement, but he might need to clarify his latest remarks. If Patrick gave a detailed statement to Mos regarding the confession and included information we are not privy to, it would have had to lead to the arrest of Joran and his accomplice. The accomplice has never even been interrogated according to Joran. So, that person, if identified to Mos last week, would have had to give a declaration. I see no arrests, so I can only conclude that Patrick has not told Mos the name of this person. He may need to clarify his earlier statement.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Observer on March 06, 2008, 04:53:16 PM
Thanks JE!

I ll tell you something... there is something strange going on with the story about the other boys
PATRICK Maar ik weet wie het lichaam in zee heeft gegooid.
But i know who threw the body into the ocean

end of transcript

As we say here in America a cliffhanger  ::MonkeyNoNo:: Will this be continued in his book? Most likely if he wants to be a best seller!

they say that the rest will be shown today on tele aruba

i found the payement bit interesting.
Someone paying the media and the cops?

This guy isn't a idiot though and certainly won't blab everything out in this Aruban interview. His ticket is his book and apparently there is some good stuff on his text messages and other recordings which I believe is how he made up his opinion who he knows dumped Natalee. If he had taped evidence of that I am sure that would be in the hands of the OM. Of course it is still possible Joran told him more that was never on any video,they had a relationship out of that Range Rover as well.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: hotping on March 06, 2008, 04:56:18 PM
PATRICK Maar ik weet wie het lichaam in zee heeft gegooid.
But i know who threw the body into the ocean
.

I contend that IF this is correct and Patrick did say that, it's a huge development and he needs to be interrogated throughly and immediately.

trust me it is the correct translation
But it could also mean that he is sure in his own mind that he knows who did it it does not necessarily mean he has proof

thanks JE
I trust you are correct. If Patrick has knowledge of what possibly occurred, he needs to explain himself. In my opinion, he has made a statement that he knows something. Now, he needs to explain it to the Authorities.

P.S. I expected someone to say it was a translation problem. We have heard that one before too...lmao ::MonkeyHaHa::

Hotping, right he did give a statement, but he might need to clarify his latest remarks. If Patrick gave a detailed statement to Mos regarding the confession and included information we are not privy to, it would have had to lead to the arrest of Joran and his accomplice. The accomplice has never even been interrogated according to Joran. So, that person, if identified to Mos last week, would have had to give a declaration. I see no arrests, so I can only conclude that Patrick has not told Mos the name of this person. He may need to clarify his earlier statement.
I Agree! But Just Maybe Mos and Staff are trying to locate the person that was named???   ::MonkeyWink:: MO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Jo-An on March 06, 2008, 04:57:55 PM
Thanks JE!

I ll tell you something... there is something strange going on with the story about the other boys
PATRICK Maar ik weet wie het lichaam in zee heeft gegooid.
But i know who threw the body into the ocean

end of transcript

As we say here in America a cliffhanger  ::MonkeyNoNo:: Will this be continued in his book? Most likely if he wants to be a best seller!

they say that the rest will be shown today on tele aruba

i found the payement bit interesting.
Someone paying the media and the cops?

to the cops and the press, i thought he meant information that patrick himself was giving.  jmo, and translations of translations are not my forte.
dennisintn

JE translated it correctly.
They are talking about payments.
Patrick says about the payments: "I'll tell you... I give both parties the same, but it's a big group. The press gets something and also the involved police-officers."


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Kiwi on March 06, 2008, 04:58:12 PM
Considering that Joran van der Sloot just found out he was caught on tape .... why is he not outraged ... why is he upholding Patrick van der Eem and Peter Devries.

Also ... Joran foretells that he will not be touched by authorities ... his lies will be verified ... his lies will save him.

Something is not right ... especially when you consider Joran's anger issues. 

Janet

++++++++++++++


Joran Van der Sloot
Pauw & Witteman
(Phone Interview/Grandma's house)
Februar



Joran: These days these things are so little, but it's just been unbelievable dumb, really really, not normal dumb, and I hope that will become more peaceful because it seems that all hell is breaking loose.

Question: Have you had contact with the boy that might have moved the body of Natalee?

Joran: Yes, no, that's just a boy I met on Aruba, just now, when I was there,

Question: Did you speak to him?

Joran: But now I just met him.

Question: Does the police have contact with this boy now?

Joran: Yes, well I don't know, I don't know it all. I have talked to my parents and my lawyer, and I just don't know what's happening now. I don't know what the OM is thinking. I think they are going to investigate it all, and it will show that it is not that way.

++++++++++++


Joran Van der Sloot
Pauw & Witteman
(Phone Interview/Grandma's house)
February 4, 2008


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pu0QWaD27y4


This is the area I'm looking at. At the time of the phone interview Joran was not so sure how much he had said at least for the moment that they asked the question. Maybe he was high during the interview at Grandma's house.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: JE on March 06, 2008, 05:03:39 PM
Thanks JE!

I ll tell you something... there is something strange going on with the story about the other boys
PATRICK Maar ik weet wie het lichaam in zee heeft gegooid.
But i know who threw the body into the ocean

end of transcript

As we say here in America a cliffhanger  ::MonkeyNoNo:: Will this be continued in his book? Most likely if he wants to be a best seller!

they say that the rest will be shown today on tele aruba

i found the payement bit interesting.
Someone paying the media and the cops?

to the cops and the press, i thought he meant information that patrick himself was giving.  jmo, and translations of translations are not my forte.
dennisintn

The way i read it was: interviewer asks which parties were involved where the payments are concerned
Patrick answers:(litteraly) i give both parties the same..... I interpreted this as him saying that both media and police
were receiving money. just my interpretation.

It could also mean him (patrick) giving information to both parties. But since it was an answer to the interviewers question i figured it was about payments.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: caesu on March 06, 2008, 05:07:15 PM
Here's a theory:

Once this case is solved, Hans Mos will use the victory and the subsequent shift in power/government to make a run for Prime Minister.   

PM of some swampy ditch if he is lucky.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: JE on March 06, 2008, 05:12:56 PM
Thanks JE!

I ll tell you something... there is something strange going on with the story about the other boys
PATRICK Maar ik weet wie het lichaam in zee heeft gegooid.
But i know who threw the body into the ocean

end of transcript

As we say here in America a cliffhanger  ::MonkeyNoNo:: Will this be continued in his book? Most likely if he wants to be a best seller!

they say that the rest will be shown today on tele aruba

i found the payement bit interesting.
Someone paying the media and the cops?

to the cops and the press, i thought he meant information that patrick himself was giving.  jmo, and translations of translations are not my forte.
dennisintn

The way i read it was: interviewer asks which parties were involved where the payments are concerned
Patrick answers:(litteraly) i give both parties the same..... I interpreted this as him saying that both media and police
were receiving money. just my interpretation.

It could also mean him (patrick) giving information to both parties. But since it was an answer to the interviewers question i figured it was about payments.


Also just before the question of who's involved where payments are concerned patrick says
he spends an awfull lot of money(meaning Joran presumably or could that be daddy)
suspicous mode on
daddy paying off police?
suspicious mode off

JMO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: caesu on March 06, 2008, 05:14:56 PM
PATRICK Maar ik weet wie het lichaam in zee heeft gegooid.
But i know who threw the body into the ocean
.

I contend that IF this is correct and Patrick did say that, it's a huge development and he needs to be interrogated throughly and immediately.

trust me it is the correct translation
But it could also mean that he is sure in his own mind that he knows who did it it does not necessarily mean he has proof

correct translation dutch > english yes
but also correct papiamentu > dutch?? i don't know. peter r. says no.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 06, 2008, 05:21:31 PM
Thanks JE!

I ll tell you something... there is something strange going on with the story about the other boys
PATRICK Maar ik weet wie het lichaam in zee heeft gegooid.
But i know who threw the body into the ocean

end of transcript

As we say here in America a cliffhanger  ::MonkeyNoNo:: Will this be continued in his book? Most likely if he wants to be a best seller!

they say that the rest will be shown today on tele aruba

i found the payement bit interesting.
Someone paying the media and the cops?

to the cops and the press, i thought he meant information that patrick himself was giving.  jmo, and translations of translations are not my forte.
dennisintn

JE translated it correctly.
They are talking about payments.
Patrick says about the payments: "I'll tell you... I give both parties the same, but it's a big group. The press gets something and also the involved police-officers."


Hopefully, he went into more detail about this on the video we haven't seen/heard. A US and Dutch broadcast of this entire interviewer/off-camera interview needs to happen.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: klaasend on March 06, 2008, 05:23:05 PM
Posted by Luvslalom at RU - translation of the first 7 minutes of the Telearuba broadcast last week:


There are 2 different You tube translations done from Pap to English with THANKS to Reaver/Aruba.

The last part on which tonights show will be on was a translation from Dutch to English.
According to MF/Aruba the following is 7 min of the broadcast. Not all segments have been translated, as I mentioned above.



PvdE: (inaudible) ...... the Netherlands, he lied everything together, unbelievable

PC: You are telling me that there is too much lying, for it not to be true?

PvdE: see, he doesn't want to tell exactly what he did to the girl, you know, maybe she died of GHB or maybe they gang raped her or something like that must have happened. This girl didn't die of natural causes.

PC: One more time, do you think that you have asked all the questions you would've wanted to ask?

PvdE: see, now afterwards there are some questions you can.....look, the ambulance thing, why didn't he call an ambulance? That's a question that I regret not asking. (..)

PC: But if you get a second chance that is the additional question you will ask?

PvdE: ofcourse, sure! you understand?! to see his reaction on that. Since the beginning he told me about....... we have more than 10 auto rides, 20 something hours on tape I couldn't have cut in...... many times I ask the same questions, sometimes I go harder on him, you know...and he tells me "no way no way, don't you believe me?" then I had to back off a little bit again you understand?.

PC: Are you still in contact with him?

PvdE: No.

PC: Do you want to have contact with him?

PvdE: No, no, why must I have contact with a person like that? See, I want contact with him when he wants me to tell him what to do. He must go to a TBS clinic stay in there for 2 years to find out what is wrong with Joran van der Sloot, because there are many things wrong with this man, many many things, you understand? And ...Good friend? It was never my intention for him to be my friend. See, sometimes, there were times I laugh with him, you understand? But yeah, he's a 20 year old man, not everything Joran does is bad. But yeah, the thing he did, that’s where he went wrong. If the thing happened to me or you, I know what you would've done, you know what I would've done.. Aruba is small everything is close by; I would've call the ambulance immediately. Why not?!

PC: Pactrick van der Eem, is going for fame?

PvdE. That's correct.

*************************************************************



(inaudible)..
PvdE: ……no no no that’s the thing you understand?

PC: But do you see my show any different than all the other persons that talked to you?

PvdE: Yes, no but it good it the first in Aruba.

PC: Will you give me your telephone number and e-mail address and I can contact you and give you the information exactly what time it will begin and which site you can go to watch it.

PvdE: yes sure! My number is 0031………..

PC: wait I’ll write it down…. Look how I called this project…

PvdE: (Zwarte Sloot) Black Ditch.(they laugh): no, out of the (Sloot) ditch, IN the ditch…. 00316107209XX

PC: How minutes do you have Niche? 17? I calculated it good; I calculated 15 minutes good good good. We did talk a lot right?.......(laughter) I want a beer, you want something?

PvdE: no no thank you….209 (beep beep)

PC: you don’t want a juice or anything?

PvdE: No no thank you in a minute I’m going to for a swim with my children

PC: Ah. Ok.. this is your line?

PvdE: yes my line

PC: what is your e-mail address?

PvdE: p(beep beep)@planet.nl, that correct, but, no, see…. The police talked to them and they have a lot of things.. and I have a lot of things

PC: bring a towel for me.. Let me tell you something, I am involucrated in this thing but I never did like this (inaudible) I have information that the police have and never used. I will aired it in this show.

PvdE: what kind of information? About him, Joran?

PC:No, about what also could have happen to Natalee Holloway and nobody bother to use this information. And this will I show this day, information that is..,..how old is this situation 3 years? The information is 2.5 have nearly 3 years old. Not that I want….., I don’t say he didn’t (inaudible) ….until this case is closed every possibility must remain open.

PvdE: what do you think then? It happened at the beach, it happened at home…..

PC: well, yes, but I,… you know what happens? When I talk to you, I feel…. When you talk to somebody his energy goes in you. You lived with this guy…this guy is still in you my brother…

PvdE: NO….

PC: this guy of course! I feel somewhere you are making me doubt you. (beep) when I saw you on the tv I got a feeling I never got before. I saw an incredible acting. This guys had you through, this guy knew you were looking for information out of him, and he was going to give you the information for you to help him with the supposed deal. I didn’t want old facts that you talked about in other shows, I want new facts.. (inaudible, beeping), you know what I mean?

PvdE:But wait, I could have not lived with myself, if I knew him for many years and knowing that he did something like this . .But now I took it off like it was nothing. But this thing had to be this way man. When I heard that he was coming to Arnhem, I thought about it already, see when I meet you I will finish you off, I knew it then. I enter the casino (beep).. there I threw my fishingline, and I held him on a line for 7 months… (beep) the second time they picked him up……

PC. That they detained him you mean?

PvdE. No they picked him up one time they put him in jail, I was in the Netherlands

*************************************************************
Dutch to English

PvdE: It was on a Wednesday and we would start with it Monday.

PC: Ah, yes, yes.

PvdE: I had thought of some things myself, from hidden mini-camera's in plants till even an Internet and phone connection that were tapped. But I will tell you something, he spends a lot of money.

PC: Which parties are involved in this?

PvdE:The Press gets something, but also the police officers involved. Look, when a problem of this magnitude happens on Aruba people will get a different view, because all he says is just incredible!

PC: Yes, and it will be repeating itself.

PvdE: Yes, and the whole image of him will be getting worse.

PvdE: Let me tell you something, there is something strange about the story of the other boy.

PvdE: But I know who has dumped her into the sea.

TO BE CONTINUED.

Comment of PC:

Let me first make clear that what you see Patrick smoke is just a normal cigarette. I am not smoking either.

This film that was closed with "to be continues" is because this Thursday the entire movie will be broad casted. It is a movie in which many obscene words will be used.
That was the only way to have Patrick make feel at ease and have him talk "of the record".

But this Thursday, at 21:00 the movie will be broad casted in its entirety on Tele Aruba. But because we are still negotiating with Holland and the United States regarding the broadcasting rights, in which the other side of the medal will be shown, in which mr van der Eem has lured Joran into a car in order to obtain the information, which was just shown.

This Thursday it will be broad casted in a 20 minute during movie what information van der Eem was able to gather from Joran.

Finally, a video segment:

PvdE: One day he will fall on his face.
You have no idea what his other relatives are doing. I will make sure that their entire lives become bitter. I have more then 120 sms messages in my possession.

PC: How do we know that this is not a trick between you and Joran?

PvdE: When you come to Holland I will show you something, haha.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 06, 2008, 05:29:38 PM
Finally, a video segment:

PvdE: One day he will fall on his face.
You have no idea what his other relatives are doing. I will make sure that their entire lives become bitter. I have more then 120 sms messages in my possession.

PC: How do we know that this is not a trick between you and Joran?

PvdE: When you come to Holland I will show you something, haha.




I wonder what he means by the last line "I will show you something? And what are his other relatives doing (I think he is implying something illegal perhaps?) 



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Observer on March 06, 2008, 05:29:51 PM
Also just before the question of who's involved where payments are concerned patrick says
he spends an awfull lot of money(meaning Joran presumably or could that be daddy)
suspicous mode on
daddy paying off police?
suspicious mode off

JMO

That sounds more like it,we saw his comments where he said "And I will make sure that Joran and his entire family in their mouth. They can better emigrate to Africa, "Van der Eem threatening. That was pretty bold so he must have something to back that up.

Also,I have not seen a translation saying he thinks Natalee was gangraped and Joran was trying to make her Death look natural. Again he's no idiot and he knows a 18 year old girl just doesnt go into seizures out of the blue and have her body dumped and everyone lie about it. There has to be much more conversation that we are missing,and what he meant that the other boys acted strange.IMO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: JE on March 06, 2008, 05:30:49 PM
I think this whole tele aruba thing is just another developement as there have been so many before. They claim there is big news but in the the end it will be another story open to interpretion and speculation by all of us. It may give an insight into the inner workings and motives of Patrick van der Eem but it will not, just like the PRDV tapes lead to a conviction. If it turns out that Patrick had knowledge that could have solved the case but witheld that information for fame or financial gain he should be up there with JVDS in a court room being questioned by Bram Mozcowitzs. I for now want to give him the benefit of the doubt and am willing to believe that the tele aruba reporter is just looking for his 15 minutes of dubious fame. BTW the show airs in aruba in 2 1/2 hours.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Rob on March 06, 2008, 05:37:20 PM
Finally, a video segment:

PvdE: One day he will fall on his face.
You have no idea what his other relatives are doing. I will make sure that their entire lives become bitter. I have more then 120 sms messages in my possession.

PC: How do we know that this is not a trick between you and Joran?

PvdE: When you come to Holland I will show you something, haha.




I wonder what he means by the last line "I will show you something? And what are his other relatives doing (I think he is implying something illegal perhaps?) 



nice catch Bladerunner.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 06, 2008, 05:38:26 PM
I think this whole tele aruba thing is just another developement as there have been so many before. They claim there is big news but in the the end it will be another story open to interpretion and speculation by all of us. It may give an insight into the inner workings and motives of Patrick van der Eem but it will not, just like the PRDV tapes lead to a conviction. If it turns out that Patrick had knowledge that could have solved the case but witheld that information for fame or financial gain he should be up there with JVDS in a court room being questioned by Bram Mozcowitzs. I for now want to give him the benefit of the doubt and am willing to believe that the tele aruba reporter is just looking for his 15 minutes of dubious fame. BTW the show airs in aruba in 2 1/2 hours.

If this keeps the attention of the media and general public on this case then whatever this whole things is about is a positive in my opinion. Didn't I read something about negotiating network rights to these videos in the US and Holland?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: JE on March 06, 2008, 05:40:18 PM
Posted by Luvslalom at RU - translation of the first 7 minutes of the Telearuba broadcast last week:


There are 2 different You tube translations done from Pap to English with THANKS to Reaver/Aruba.

The last part on which tonights show will be on was a translation from Dutch to English.
According to MF/Aruba the following is 7 min of the broadcast. Not all segments have been translated, as I mentioned above.



Klaas the one i translated is from the Nieuwe Revu. They claim to have the video translated by a proffesional translator into dutch.

Since the nieuwe revu's translation contains more text than the one on RU i am inclined to believe that theirs is closer to the truth. a translator would not make up text that is not there

but then i can be wrong LOL


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: caesu on March 06, 2008, 05:41:45 PM
Quote
PvdE:But wait, I could have not lived with myself, if I knew him for many years and knowing that he did something like this . .But now I took it off like it was nothing. But this thing had to be this way man. When I heard that he was coming to Arnhem, I thought about it already, see when I meet you I will finish you off, I knew it then. I enter the casino (beep).. there I threw my fishingline, and I held him on a line for 7 months… (beep) the second time they picked him up……

if i read this it is not like Patrick knew Joran for many years.
but it is like when he met Joran at the casino he couldn't have lived with himself (for years) without trying to get Joran to confess.

this could be a better papiamentu translation than the Revu did.

the last part is just the Revu translation with the line the police and press getting money.
and that he knows who dumped her in the sea.

i very much doubt this translation (if Patrick even said it) because Revu had it apparently wrong in the translation about how long Patrick knew Joran.

add to that Peter R. saying they got the translation wrong.
add to that Patrick coming on Jensen's show after knowing the was secretly taped on tele aruba (he must have known that because the broadcast was on sunday).
add to that Stan de Jong co-wrote the Revu article.
Stan de Jong is together with Steve Brown archenemy of Peter R. de Vries.

i conclude the Revu played up a big hoax.

very well done Revu. more misinformation floating around popping up everywhere.  ::MonkeyNoNo::
as if there is not enough of that already.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 06, 2008, 05:41:59 PM
Finally, a video segment:

PvdE: One day he will fall on his face.
You have no idea what his other relatives are doing. I will make sure that their entire lives become bitter. I have more then 120 sms messages in my possession.

PC: How do we know that this is not a trick between you and Joran?

PvdE: When you come to Holland I will show you something, haha.




I wonder what he means by the last line "I will show you something? And what are his other relatives doing (I think he is implying something illegal perhaps?) 



nice catch Bladerunner.
Again, body language, etc. here would be very helpful, as you could interpret those statement several different ways. Although this one seems pretty clear to me and I am on board with it 100%:


I will make sure that their entire lives become bitter.  


 ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: klaasend on March 06, 2008, 05:42:27 PM
Posted by Luvslalom at RU - translation of the first 7 minutes of the Telearuba broadcast last week:


There are 2 different You tube translations done from Pap to English with THANKS to Reaver/Aruba.

The last part on which tonights show will be on was a translation from Dutch to English.
According to MF/Aruba the following is 7 min of the broadcast. Not all segments have been translated, as I mentioned above.



Klaas the one i translated is from the Nieuwe Revu. They claim to have the video translated by a proffesional translator into dutch.

Since the nieuwe revu's translation contains more text than the one on RU i am inclined to believe that theirs is closer to the truth. a translator would not make up text that is not there

but then i can be wrong LOL

JE - thanks, you are probably correct


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Blue Moon on March 06, 2008, 05:43:51 PM
Here's a theory:

Once this case is solved, Hans Mos will use the victory and the subsequent shift in power/government to make a run for Prime Minister.   

Which party do you think Mos belongs to-the same one in control now (MEP I think)? Does make sense except you are more optimistic than I am that Mos will solve this in our lifetime.  Thanks again for all you and the crew did for Natalee.  I have enjoyed reading your website and would love to see a documentary on the ocean scenes and what when on those over 2 months time.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: caesu on March 06, 2008, 05:44:30 PM
Finally, a video segment:

PvdE: One day he will fall on his face.
You have no idea what his other relatives are doing. I will make sure that their entire lives become bitter. I have more then 120 sms messages in my possession.

PC: How do we know that this is not a trick between you and Joran?

PvdE: When you come to Holland I will show you something, haha.




I wonder what he means by the last line "I will show you something? And what are his other relatives doing (I think he is implying something illegal perhaps?) 



nice catch Bladerunner.

i think it means "i'll show you the text messages".
to show that it is NOT a trick between Patrick and Joran.
he also showed Jensen text messages.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 06, 2008, 05:46:37 PM
Quote
PvdE:But wait, I could have not lived with myself, if I knew him for many years and knowing that he did something like this . .But now I took it off like it was nothing. But this thing had to be this way man. When I heard that he was coming to Arnhem, I thought about it already, see when I meet you I will finish you off, I knew it then. I enter the casino (beep).. there I threw my fishingline, and I held him on a line for 7 months… (beep) the second time they picked him up……

if i read this it is not like Patrick knew Joran for many years.
but it is like when he met Joran at the casino he couldn't have lived with himself (for years) without trying to get Joran to confess.

this could be a better papiamentu translation than the Revu did.

the last part is just the Revu translation with the line the police and press getting money.
and that he knows who dumped her in the sea.

i very much doubt this translation (if Patrick even said it) because Revu had it apparently wrong in the translation about how long Patrick knew Joran.

add to that Peter R. saying they got the translation wrong.
add to that Patrick coming on Jensen's show after knowing the was secretly taped on tele aruba (he must have known that because the broadcast was on sunday).
add to that Stan de Jong co-wrote the Revu article.
Stan de Jong is together with Steve Brown archenemy of Peter R. de Vries.

i conclude the Revu played up a big hoax.

very well done Revu. more misinformation floating around popping up everywhere.  ::MonkeyNoNo::
as if there is not enough of that already.

I think it could also be interpreted to mean that Patrick is saying IF he was someone who DID know Joran for years and heard him say these things and did nothing about it then he could not live with himself knowing he did nothing. Kind of like if your old friend told you he killed someone and you don't go to the police.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: texasmom on March 06, 2008, 05:48:49 PM
Thanks for bringing the translations over Klaas!

I've got some catching up to do, but I'll be back. 

I'm looking forward to reports from the remaining portion of the teleruba show!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: JE on March 06, 2008, 05:49:15 PM
Haven't we got any aruban/papiamentu speaking posters who can take the guesswork out of these translations?
I just went with what revu wrote I'm quite sure my translation was quite accurate but like Ceasu said who knows if revu's translation is correct in the first place?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 06, 2008, 05:50:32 PM
Finally, a video segment:

PvdE: One day he will fall on his face.
You have no idea what his other relatives are doing. I will make sure that their entire lives become bitter. I have more then 120 sms messages in my possession.

PC: How do we know that this is not a trick between you and Joran?

PvdE: When you come to Holland I will show you something, haha.




I wonder what he means by the last line "I will show you something? And what are his other relatives doing (I think he is implying something illegal perhaps?) 



nice catch Bladerunner.

i think it means "i'll show you the text messages".
to show that it is NOT a trick between Patrick and Joran.
he also showed Jensen text messages.

So these text messages are what Patrick plans to become famous and rich for, by releasing them to the public in another book? What else does he have I wonder!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: klaasend on March 06, 2008, 05:52:27 PM
Haven't we got any aruban/papiamentu speaking posters who can take the guesswork out of these translations?
I just went with what revu wrote I'm quite sure my translation was quite accurate but like Ceasu said who knows if revu's translation is correct in the first place?

I haven't seen Capslock around today but he can translate Pap to English.  Hopefully he'll watch tonights show and at least give us a summary.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: caesu on March 06, 2008, 05:53:05 PM
Here's a theory:

Once this case is solved, Hans Mos will use the victory and the subsequent shift in power/government to make a run for Prime Minister.   

Which party do you think Mos belongs to-the same one in control now (MEP I think)? Does make sense except you are more optimistic than I am that Mos will solve this in our lifetime.  Thanks again for all you and the crew did for Natalee.  I have enjoyed reading your website and would love to see a documentary on the ocean scenes and what when on those over 2 months time.

no Mos is dutch. doesn't belong to any aruban party. he is going home 2009.
just a contract for 3 years. Mos doesn't mean anything.
he will go back to the netherlands and get a low profile justice job somewhere far away in the country side.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: caesu on March 06, 2008, 05:56:09 PM
Quote
PvdE:But wait, I could have not lived with myself, if I knew him for many years and knowing that he did something like this . .But now I took it off like it was nothing. But this thing had to be this way man. When I heard that he was coming to Arnhem, I thought about it already, see when I meet you I will finish you off, I knew it then. I enter the casino (beep).. there I threw my fishingline, and I held him on a line for 7 months… (beep) the second time they picked him up……

if i read this it is not like Patrick knew Joran for many years.
but it is like when he met Joran at the casino he couldn't have lived with himself (for years) without trying to get Joran to confess.

this could be a better papiamentu translation than the Revu did.

the last part is just the Revu translation with the line the police and press getting money.
and that he knows who dumped her in the sea.

i very much doubt this translation (if Patrick even said it) because Revu had it apparently wrong in the translation about how long Patrick knew Joran.

add to that Peter R. saying they got the translation wrong.
add to that Patrick coming on Jensen's show after knowing the was secretly taped on tele aruba (he must have known that because the broadcast was on sunday).
add to that Stan de Jong co-wrote the Revu article.
Stan de Jong is together with Steve Brown archenemy of Peter R. de Vries.

i conclude the Revu played up a big hoax.

very well done Revu. more misinformation floating around popping up everywhere.  ::MonkeyNoNo::
as if there is not enough of that already.

I think it could also be interpreted to mean that Patrick is saying IF he was someone who DID know Joran for years and heard him say these things and did nothing about it then he could not live with himself knowing he did nothing. Kind of like if your old friend told you he killed someone and you don't go to the police.

yes that is a simular interpretation more likely than the Revu misinterpretation.

but the misinformation is out there. tomorrow it is in the papers.
it will be quoted numerous times over and over again.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: dennisintn on March 06, 2008, 05:58:30 PM
I think this whole tele aruba thing is just another developement as there have been so many before. They claim there is big news but in the the end it will be another story open to interpretion and speculation by all of us. It may give an insight into the inner workings and motives of Patrick van der Eem but it will not, just like the PRDV tapes lead to a conviction. If it turns out that Patrick had knowledge that could have solved the case but witheld that information for fame or financial gain he should be up there with JVDS in a court room being questioned by Bram Mozcowitzs. I for now want to give him the benefit of the doubt and am willing to believe that the tele aruba reporter is just looking for his 15 minutes of dubious fame. BTW the show airs in aruba in 2 1/2 hours.

i guess we'll get the gielen/renfro garbage tonight, this should be interesting.
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: LoRain on March 06, 2008, 05:59:13 PM
PATRICK Maar ik weet wie het lichaam in zee heeft gegooid.
But i know who threw the body into the ocean
.

I contend that IF this is correct and Patrick did say that, it's a huge development and he needs to be interrogated throughly and immediately.

trust me it is the correct translation
But it could also mean that he is sure in his own mind that he knows who did it it does not necessarily mean he has proof

thanks JE
I trust you are correct. If Patrick has knowledge of what possibly occurred, he needs to explain himself. In my opinion, he has made a statement that he knows something. Now, he needs to explain it to the Authorities.

P.S. I expected someone to say it was a translation problem. We have heard that one before too...lmao ::MonkeyHaHa::

Hotping, right he did give a statement, but he might need to clarify his latest remarks. If Patrick gave a detailed statement to Mos regarding the confession and included information we are not privy to, it would have had to lead to the arrest of Joran and his accomplice. The accomplice has never even been interrogated according to Joran. So, that person, if identified to Mos last week, would have had to give a declaration. I see no arrests, so I can only conclude that Patrick has not told Mos the name of this person. He may need to clarify his earlier statement.

So what?  He "knows" who threw the body....Joran says he "knows" stuff too but there was nothing done about him so why is Patrick any different?  Heck...from what I have learned all you have to do is say "I was stoned and lying" and go on about one's business....I'm starting to think that all this taped business doesn't mean JACK SH>>....MO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: ala_gunslinger on March 06, 2008, 05:59:26 PM
Haven't we got any aruban/papiamentu speaking posters who can take the guesswork out of these translations?
I just went with what revu wrote I'm quite sure my translation was quite accurate but like Ceasu said who knows if revu's translation is correct in the first place?

Where is Hoshe and that Universal Translator!!! - Captain Archer


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 06, 2008, 05:59:30 PM
Quote
PvdE:But wait, I could have not lived with myself, if I knew him for many years and knowing that he did something like this . .But now I took it off like it was nothing. But this thing had to be this way man. When I heard that he was coming to Arnhem, I thought about it already, see when I meet you I will finish you off, I knew it then. I enter the casino (beep).. there I threw my fishingline, and I held him on a line for 7 months… (beep) the second time they picked him up……

if i read this it is not like Patrick knew Joran for many years.
but it is like when he met Joran at the casino he couldn't have lived with himself (for years) without trying to get Joran to confess.

this could be a better papiamentu translation than the Revu did.

the last part is just the Revu translation with the line the police and press getting money.
and that he knows who dumped her in the sea.

i very much doubt this translation (if Patrick even said it) because Revu had it apparently wrong in the translation about how long Patrick knew Joran.

add to that Peter R. saying they got the translation wrong.
add to that Patrick coming on Jensen's show after knowing the was secretly taped on tele aruba (he must have known that because the broadcast was on sunday).
add to that Stan de Jong co-wrote the Revu article.
Stan de Jong is together with Steve Brown archenemy of Peter R. de Vries.

i conclude the Revu played up a big hoax.

very well done Revu. more misinformation floating around popping up everywhere.  ::MonkeyNoNo::
as if there is not enough of that already.

I think it could also be interpreted to mean that Patrick is saying IF he was someone who DID know Joran for years and heard him say these things and did nothing about it then he could not live with himself knowing he did nothing. Kind of like if your old friend told you he killed someone and you don't go to the police.

yes that is a simular interpretation more likely than the Revu misinterpretation.

but the misinformation is out there. tomorrow it is in the papers.
it will be quoted numerous times over and over again.

Any press is good press as far as I'm concerned. People aren't stupid, they will figure out what is REALLY going on. Especially, if the monetary payoff angle is featured, hopefully it will be.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: caesu on March 06, 2008, 06:15:46 PM
Quote
PvdE:But wait, I could have not lived with myself, if I knew him for many years and knowing that he did something like this . .But now I took it off like it was nothing. But this thing had to be this way man. When I heard that he was coming to Arnhem, I thought about it already, see when I meet you I will finish you off, I knew it then. I enter the casino (beep).. there I threw my fishingline, and I held him on a line for 7 months… (beep) the second time they picked him up……

if i read this it is not like Patrick knew Joran for many years.
but it is like when he met Joran at the casino he couldn't have lived with himself (for years) without trying to get Joran to confess.

this could be a better papiamentu translation than the Revu did.

the last part is just the Revu translation with the line the police and press getting money.
and that he knows who dumped her in the sea.

i very much doubt this translation (if Patrick even said it) because Revu had it apparently wrong in the translation about how long Patrick knew Joran.

add to that Peter R. saying they got the translation wrong.
add to that Patrick coming on Jensen's show after knowing the was secretly taped on tele aruba (he must have known that because the broadcast was on sunday).
add to that Stan de Jong co-wrote the Revu article.
Stan de Jong is together with Steve Brown archenemy of Peter R. de Vries.

i conclude the Revu played up a big hoax.

very well done Revu. more misinformation floating around popping up everywhere.  ::MonkeyNoNo::
as if there is not enough of that already.

I think it could also be interpreted to mean that Patrick is saying IF he was someone who DID know Joran for years and heard him say these things and did nothing about it then he could not live with himself knowing he did nothing. Kind of like if your old friend told you he killed someone and you don't go to the police.

yes that is a simular interpretation more likely than the Revu misinterpretation.

but the misinformation is out there. tomorrow it is in the papers.
it will be quoted numerous times over and over again.

Any press is good press as far as I'm concerned. People aren't stupid, they will figure out what is REALLY going on. Especially, if the monetary payoff angle is featured, hopefully it will be.

i totally agree. media attention is good. because peter r. was today in two tv-shows to debunk revu.
now revu has to come up with something to proof their translation is correct. and on and on.

the ditch just keeps on smelling worse.
patrick lifted the lid. and many ditch-people don't like that.

i am sure peter r. has a lot more. like GMBW said. peter r. has leads for his next program.
but peter r. stays quiet about those leads as magazine like Revu go spreading misinfo about those leads beforehand.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: caesu on March 06, 2008, 06:26:36 PM
Quote
SERIE: DE ANTILLEN, DEEL 2: ANTILLEN CORRUPT BOEVENNEST?

PVV-Kamerlid Brinkman noemde de Antillen een corrupt boevennest en vanaf dat moment bleven de deuren op het eiland voor Nederlandse Kamerleden gesloten.     
     NOVA ging op onderzoek en sprak met de eilandbewoners. Bewoners die niet op het lijstje staan van een officiële Kamerdelegatie. Zijn de Antillen echt een corrupt boevennest?

http://www.novatv.nl/index.cfm?ln=nl&fuseaction=videoaudio.details&reportage_id=5867&CFID=38449871&CFTOKEN=39632687

Quote
SERIES: THE ANTILLES, PART 2: ANTILLES CORRUPT GANGSTER NEST?

Pvv-MP Brinkman called the Antilles a corrupt gangster nest and as from that moment the doors on the island for Dutch Member of Parliament remained closed. NOVA went on research and spoke with the islanders. Citizen are not on the list of an official parliamentary delegation. Are the Antilles really a corrupt gangster nest?


this was on last night.
totally missed it due to the revu-hoax. but i'll watch it tomorrow.


this is quite offending article in St. Maarten Today newspaper:
comparing people who speak to NOVA to NAZI-traitors!!!!
(http://sxmprivateeye.com/files/images/Today%20Editorial%20-%20NOVA%20and%20Nazi%20collaborators%20-%2019th%20February%202008.JPG)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: klaasend on March 06, 2008, 06:30:55 PM
Posted by Glenda at RU:

Patrick threatens Poentje. TeleAruba canx tonight's show!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: klaasend on March 06, 2008, 06:32:01 PM
Posted by Glenda at RU:

Patrick threatens Poentje. TeleAruba canx tonight's show!

So Glenda wants us to believe Patrick has some kind of power to get Poentje to cancel the show?   ::MonkeyRoll::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: caesu on March 06, 2008, 06:34:29 PM
Posted by Glenda at RU:

Patrick threatens Poentje. TeleAruba canx tonight's show!

i hope Patrick goes public on one of the dutch talkshows tomorrow.
those guys who wrote that Revu-BS-article better keep an eye open tonight.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 06, 2008, 06:37:26 PM
Finally, a video segment:

PvdE: One day he will fall on his face.
You have no idea what his other relatives are doing. I will make sure that their entire lives become bitter. I have more then 120 sms messages in my possession.

PC: How do we know that this is not a trick between you and Joran?

PvdE: When you come to Holland I will show you something, haha.

I wonder what he means by the last line "I will show you something? And what are his other relatives doing (I think he is implying something illegal perhaps?) 


nice catch Bladerunner.
Again, body language, etc. here would be very helpful, as you could interpret those statement several different ways. Although this one seems pretty clear to me and I am on board with it 100%:

I will make sure that their entire lives become bitter.  


 ::MonkeyDance::


Patrick van der Eem is so naive ... he lacks common sense.  If he continues down the same unwise path that is paved with underlying public threats against the VDS' ....

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Logic dictates that the VDS' hold the power in regards to making lives "bitter".  Natalee Holloway's family can attest to it.  Paulus and Joran are untouchable.

Think about it ... Where is Mickey John?  Where is Barbeshe?  Where is Junior?  Patrick can only hope that these persons where compensated for their silence.

Janet

++++++++++++

Mickey John
On the Record w/ Greta
June 29, 2005


JOHN:.......He (Deepak) said a story being made up about dropping the girl of at a Holiday Inn, was all something being made up. He, and the Dutch guy, and the Dutch guy's father, they sit and made up the story.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,161044,00.html


Jossy Mansur
Geraldo At Large
July 31, 2005


... The letter that we received is from the wife of the person with whom this guy was on the beach with between the Holiday Inn and Marriott wrote us because she was getting a annoyed that no one was paying attention to the declaration that this man gave to her husband at the hotel.

I will read it for you... The day after Natalee was missing a person called Barbeshe (Bar-Be-she) told a story that the night before he saw 3 people in front of the Holiday Inn with a girl's body. That they tried to take a towel from one the "walks fence's" (really hard to understand him here - sounds like he says "water sports dance or fence") to wrap the body and they could not get it down. Then one of them went to the garbage cans at the Holiday Inn and pulled the bags out and wrapped the body, then put her in the white pick-up and left. They went out and turned left towards the lighthouse and turned off on a dirt road and dug a hole and put her in it and threw out the shovel. He also said he told the police and they sent him on a 4 wheeler to try and find, locate the spot and he had been threatened by these people. This person has been seen on the beach everyday has no longer been seen after this and was known to be there daily.


Junior - The Landfill Witness
On the Record w/ Greta
August 4, 2005


JUNIOR: Am I certain?  Yes, I am really sure.  That is why I think, today, “I’m sure, I’m sure. I have no doubt in my mind.” Yes. Also the father, I believe, yes, yes. Also him. I was even more sure it was this girl because now there were two cars. The Police have two cars--the red Jeep, which… I saw that. I saw that because the red Jeep was fine, but that came later, that was the next day. I was near the place where she was buried--may she rest in peace. I was there, maybe, nine days later.

VAN SUSTEREN: What is his level of certainty?
 
JUNIOR: Am I certain?  Yes, I am really sure.  That is why I think, today, “I’m sure, I’m sure. I have no doubt in my mind.” Yes. Also the father, I believe, yes, yes. Also him. I was even more sure it was this girl because now there were two cars. The Police have two cars--the red Jeep, which… I saw that. I saw that because the red Jeep was fine, but that came later, that was the next day. I was near the place where she was buried--may she rest in peace. I was there, maybe, nine days later.

VAN SUSTEREN: If there were three, does the father make four, or, is the father one of the three?
 
JUNIOR: The father came in the Jeep. He got out of the car. He was standing there and he was pointing and asking things. I was working, you know, but he was far and he was talking. I was just working and looking. He kept asking if everything was okay. Yes, they asked him. I thought that they were asking him, that is what I thought they were doing, asking him, “Where? Where?”


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: anidac on March 06, 2008, 06:47:18 PM
Finally, a video segment:

PvdE: One day he will fall on his face.
You have no idea what his other relatives are doing. I will make sure that their entire lives become bitter. I have more then 120 sms messages in my possession.

PC: How do we know that this is not a trick between you and Joran?

PvdE: When you come to Holland I will show you something, haha.




I wonder what he means by the last line "I will show you something? And what are his other relatives doing (I think he is implying something illegal perhaps?) 



nice catch Bladerunner.

i think it means "i'll show you the text messages".
to show that it is NOT a trick between Patrick and Joran.
he also showed Jensen text messages.


 ::MonkeyEek::What is this all about ::MonkeyEek::

I am just getting in from work and haven't started reading back in the thread but this caught my eye and I can't wait to know where this is coming from ::MonkeyShocked::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: JE on March 06, 2008, 06:53:23 PM
Finally, a video segment:

PvdE: One day he will fall on his face.
You have no idea what his other relatives are doing. I will make sure that their entire lives become bitter. I have more then 120 sms messages in my possession.

PC: How do we know that this is not a trick between you and Joran?

PvdE: When you come to Holland I will show you something, haha.




I wonder what he means by the last line "I will show you something? And what are his other relatives doing (I think he is implying something illegal perhaps?) 



nice catch Bladerunner.

i think it means "i'll show you the text messages".
to show that it is NOT a trick between Patrick and Joran.
he also showed Jensen text messages.


 ::MonkeyEek::What is this all about ::MonkeyEek::

I am just getting in from work and haven't started reading back in the thread but this caught my eye and I can't wait to know where this is coming from ::MonkeyShocked::

Lots of rumours
Patrick knows who dumped body in ocean
2000 euro's paid for silence from boat driver etc

go back a few pages interesting stuff


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: AZSunny on March 06, 2008, 06:57:43 PM
PATRICK Maar ik weet wie het lichaam in zee heeft gegooid.
But i know who threw the body into the ocean
.

I contend that IF this is correct and Patrick did say that, it's a huge development and he needs to be interrogated throughly and immediately.

trust me it is the correct translation
But it could also mean that he is sure in his own mind that he knows who did it it does not necessarily mean he has proof

thanks JE
I trust you are correct. If Patrick has knowledge of what possibly occurred, he needs to explain himself. In my opinion, he has made a statement that he knows something. Now, he needs to explain it to the Authorities.

P.S. I expected someone to say it was a translation problem. We have heard that one before too...lmao ::MonkeyHaHa::

Hotping, right he did give a statement, but he might need to clarify his latest remarks. If Patrick gave a detailed statement to Mos regarding the confession and included information we are not privy to, it would have had to lead to the arrest of Joran and his accomplice. The accomplice has never even been interrogated according to Joran. So, that person, if identified to Mos last week, would have had to give a declaration. I see no arrests, so I can only conclude that Patrick has not told Mos the name of this person. He may need to clarify his earlier statement.

Don't you think Patrick said, " oh, I know who did it" just like we say, we 'know' Paulus was the accomplice. Not that it has been confirmed, but it just makes sense, therefore, we 'know'  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: oceanexploration on March 06, 2008, 07:13:02 PM
Klaasend... you have mail.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: klaasend on March 06, 2008, 07:20:23 PM
Klaasend... you have mail.

Thanks Kyle - please check your email now as I have a question for you before I post it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 06, 2008, 07:23:18 PM
Klaasend... you have mail.

Thanks Kyle - please check your email now as I have a question for you before I post it.
::MonkeyEek::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: klaasend on March 06, 2008, 07:24:35 PM
Klaasend... you have mail.

Thanks Kyle - please check your email now as I have a question for you before I post it.

Need to reboot, BRB


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Observer on March 06, 2008, 07:24:47 PM
(Translation)
"I know who Holloway threw into the sea '
By MAAIKE RUEPERT

ALMELO - Patrick van der Eem, Joran van der Sloot led a confession about the disappearance of Natalee Holloway, is himself secretly filmed.
During the recordings he says: 'I know who the body is thrown into the sea.''

In a response zwakt Van der Eem its ruling. ,, It was tough talk,''says the Almelose entrepreneur. ,, I am not sure who has thrown her into the sea. We had to speculate. If I certainly had known who it was, do you think Joran than I would have followed so long?''

Moreover, the Van der Eem, who does not want to talk about who he is, the tension there: 'I know more than you all.''

The Aruban TV show Un Dia den Bida left after an interview with Van der Eem a camera passed without him informed. The images cover a rather cryptic conversation in the Papiaments between the presenter of the programme and Van der Eem.

In the discussion that he tells the Almeloër Van der Sloot 'al so many years' kent, while this week on the Dutch TV told him seven months. Also he says that he has undercoveroperatie thought that the environment had to be equipped with microphones and miniature cameras in plants and that internet and telephone links are drained. It continues with over payouts to the press and policemen.

Van der Eem getergd yesterday responded to questions about the recordings. ,, I have no idea what you are talking about it. That can not be,''he said first. Then he suggested that there may be cut and pasted into it. ,, It could be anything. I do really nothing. I am a simple boy. It is not at all about me. I have done nothing wrong. All I am saying all things, it was for me just a gesprekje. I can negate everything.''

The interview was broadcast yesterday on the Aruban television.

http://www.ad.nl/binnenland/2113719/Ik_weet_wie_Holloway_in_zee_gooide.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Blonde on March 06, 2008, 07:33:26 PM
Klaasend... you have mail.

Klaas can you give kyle my email I want him to see something


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: oceanexploration on March 06, 2008, 07:35:45 PM
Klaasend... you've got the goods.  Thanks


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: JE on March 06, 2008, 07:36:42 PM
srry messed up last post

in a reaction patrick says im not sue who threw her into the sea it was just tough talk we were speculating
He says I know more than you all do

Van der Eem reageerde gisteren getergd op vragen over de opnamen. ,,Ik heb geen idee waar u het over hebt. Dat kan niet,’’ zei hij eerst. Vervolgens stelde hij dat er wel in geknipt en geplakt zou zijn. ,,Ze kunnen van alles doen. Ik snap er echt helemaal niets van. Ik ben een simpele jongen. Het gaat helemaal niet om mij. Ik heb niets fout gedaan. Al zeg ik allemaal dingen, het was voor mij gewoon een gesprekje. Ik kan alles ontkrachten.’’

Van der eem reacted in a provoked manner to questions about the taping: I have no idea what you re talking about It's not possible he first said Then he said they must have cut and edited the tape. They can do anything, i dont get it. I am a simple guy. This is not about me. I did nothing wrong. Even if i say all these things, it was just a conversation to me. I can disprove anything.

sound familiar?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Observer on March 06, 2008, 07:37:30 PM
Welcome back to the cold weather OE!  ::MonkeyWink::

I see the Persistence has nice calm seas on there journey home and should be in Mexico in 36 hours!  ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: klaasend on March 06, 2008, 07:42:38 PM
From Kyle:

This is a picture taken right next to the fisherman's hut that was allegedly broken into.  The picture shows the cut-away spot in the brush where we believe the trap was stored.  There are branches cut off and rub marks on other branches indicating a trap of at least 6-7' wide may have been in the spot.  The cut-away was symmetrical.   The trap we found was too large to fit inside the fish hut door (see attached picture of the fish hut door that was replaced after the break-in).  



(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/new_door_fishing_hut.jpg)


The trap is drawn in here to give you an idea.

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/trap_model_fishhuts.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: oceanexploration on March 06, 2008, 07:43:32 PM
Welcome back to the cold weather OE!  ::MonkeyWink::

I see the Persistence has nice calm seas on there journey home and should be in Mexico in 36 hours!  ::MonkeyDance::

It's good to be back home, although the change in climate gave me a wicked head cold.  I was told today that the Persistence was already in Mexico, well ahead of schedule. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Observer on March 06, 2008, 07:50:33 PM
Welcome back to the cold weather OE!  ::MonkeyWink::

I see the Persistence has nice calm seas on there journey home and should be in Mexico in 36 hours!  ::MonkeyDance::

It's good to be back home, although the change in climate gave me a wicked head cold.  I was told today that the Persistence was already in Mexico, well ahead of schedule. 

Thanks for sharing kyle..Thats great news! :) Those good size traps with reinforced steel look mighty heavy..Must have been a few helpers to get that off of that area and into a truck or boat to launch to the sea.

Not sure how true this is..But interesting as the story came out about the same time as his arrest in 2005.

RWV Archive

The Vigilante news paper from Curacao Reports that the Croes guy might have been involved in breaking and entering on of the fishersman's huts, where appearently a fisherman reported that ropes, ankers, and tape have been stolen.


Posted by: Chris | Saturday, June 18, 2005 at 01:11 PM



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: vms on March 06, 2008, 07:51:47 PM
Lazlo Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 6:49 pm    

Poentje Castro in contact with Hans Mos.

Van der Eem noemt naam
'Justitie verbiedt uitzenden fragment door Arubaanse zender'

Van der Eem mentiones name.
"LE on Aruba forbids broadcasting segment by Aruban channel"

Van der Eem werd, nadat hij zelf met de verborgen camera een bekentenis aan Joran van der Sloot ontfutselde, zelf ook stiekem gefilmd. Dat gebeurde na een interview met Castro voor de zender Tele Aruba. Afgelopen nacht tijd zijn delen van dit off-the-record gesprek op Aruba uitgezonden. Nieuwe Revu publiceerde gisteren op haar website een transcriptie van het in het Papiaments gevoerde gesprek.

Van der Eem was, after he himself managed to have Joran confess, also filmed secretly himself.
That took place after an interview with (Poentje) Castro for the channel Tele Aruba.
Last night parts of this off-the-records conversation were broadcasted in Aruba. Nieuwe Revu published on their website a transcript of the conversation which was in Papiamento.

De op Aruba bekende presentator Castro wil niets loslaten over het deel van het gesprek waarin Van der Eem inging op wat er met het lichaam van Holloway is gebeurd. "Dat heb ik afgesproken met officier van justitie Hans Mos." Het zou in ieder geval niet gaan om Daury, de naam die Van der Sloot begin februari in het programma van Peter R. de Vries noemde.

The on Aruba known host Castro does not want to let out anything about the part in which van der Eem goes into what happened with the body of Natalee Holloway. "That I have agreed upon with chief prosecutor Hans Mos".
It would at any rate not be Daury, the name that van der Sloot mentioned early February in the show of Peter R de Vries.

http://spitsnet.nl/nieuws.php/1/12572/online 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: JE on March 06, 2008, 07:51:58 PM
From Kyle:

This is a picture taken right next to the fisherman's hut that was allegedly broken into.  The picture shows the cut-away spot in the brush where we believe the trap was stored.  There are branches cut off and rub marks on other branches indicating a trap of at least 6-7' wide may have been in the spot.  The cut-away was symmetrical.   The trap we found was too large to fit inside the fish hut door (see attached picture of the fish hut door that was replaced after the break-in).  



(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/new_door_fishing_hut.jpg)


The trap is drawn in here to give you an idea.

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/trap_model_fishhuts.jpg)

no one ever said the trap was inside the huts

from hodges site:

 The fisherman also noticed that a large fishing cage stored behind the first of the three Fisherman's Huts at the southern-most corner was missing. The cage had been there approximately a month since about Good Friday, March 25, 2005. The cage belonged to another fisherman who kept his boat next to these four huts. The boat was still there. But the cage was missing.

The fisherman described the cage as made of 3/8-inch iron (such as that used in concrete reinforcing—"rebar") with a frame size approximately 5 ½ feet by 4 feet by 17 inches. He described it as a large fishing cage with its frame wrapped in chicken wire with its familiar hexagonal openings but with an opening in one panel which allowed them to trap fish. He believed that, given its size and weight, it would take two men to manage the cage. Once aboard, it would lay low on the floor of the nearby fishing boat.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Silverfox on March 06, 2008, 07:55:50 PM
oh and PS...

I am so disappointed... ::MonkeyNoNo::

(http://i195.photobucket.com/albums/z215/kickradio/harryking.jpg)

I went out and bought NEW SUSPENDERS...

and nobody...but not notbody even noticed:

(http://i195.photobucket.com/albums/z215/kickradio/harryking2.gif)

Just goes to show everybody loves my loveable face and forgets about the rest of me...LOL  ::MonkeyTongue:: ::MonkeyHaHa::
  You a ugly monkey.  But as long as you is a monkey, that be(s) ok.     jackb

It's the nose holes, right?  I have considered a nose job but hey, then I worry if I will still smell things the same way LOLL...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Rob on March 06, 2008, 08:02:12 PM
Klaas, Grande is saying there is going to be an arrest in the Brianna Denison case.

http://helpfindthemissing.org/forum/showthread.php?t=3199


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Blue Moon on March 06, 2008, 08:02:44 PM
oh and PS...

I am so disappointed... ::MonkeyNoNo::

(http://i195.photobucket.com/albums/z215/kickradio/harryking.jpg)

I went out and bought NEW SUSPENDERS...

and nobody...but not notbody even noticed:

(http://i195.photobucket.com/albums/z215/kickradio/harryking2.gif)

Just goes to show everybody loves my loveable face and forgets about the rest of me...LOL  ::MonkeyTongue:: ::MonkeyHaHa::
  You a ugly monkey.  But as long as you is a monkey, that be(s) ok.     jackb

It's the nose holes, right?  I have considered a nose job but hey, then I worry if I will still smell things the same way LOLL...

Silverfox, I love "Larry's" suspenders.  Amazing how much this monkey looks like Larry King.  I laugh every time I see your avatar. ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: texasmom on March 06, 2008, 08:03:04 PM
Welcome back to the cold weather OE!  ::MonkeyWink::

I see the Persistence has nice calm seas on there journey home and should be in Mexico in 36 hours!  ::MonkeyDance::

It's good to be back home, although the change in climate gave me a wicked head cold.  I was told today that the Persistence was already in Mexico, well ahead of schedule. 

Hope you feel better soon Kyle!  Great to hear that the Persistence is ahead of schedule on the trip home, I know they are anxious to be with their families.  Try some chicken noodle soup for that cold.  The climate here in Texas changes about every 12 hours these days.  Spring flowers and trees are blooming and they are predicting freezing temperatures, sleet and snow for tonight and tomorrow.  I had the air conditioner on last night! 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: klaasend on March 06, 2008, 08:07:18 PM
Klaas, Grande is saying there is going to be an arrest in the Brianna Denison case.

http://helpfindthemissing.org/forum/showthread.php?t=3199

Thanks for the info Rob


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: ala_gunslinger on March 06, 2008, 08:17:01 PM
Welcome back to the cold weather OE!  ::MonkeyWink::

I see the Persistence has nice calm seas on there journey home and should be in Mexico in 36 hours!  ::MonkeyDance::

It's good to be back home, although the change in climate gave me a wicked head cold.  I was told today that the Persistence was already in Mexico, well ahead of schedule. 

Hope you feel better soon Kyle!  Great to hear that the Persistence is ahead of schedule on the trip home, I know they are anxious to be with their families.  Try some chicken noodle soup for that cold.  The climate here in Texas changes about every 12 hours these days.  Spring flowers and trees are blooming and they are predicting freezing temperatures, sleet and snow for tonight and tomorrow.  I had the air conditioner on last night! 

Yeah Kyle, but dump about 3 tablespoons of Texas Pete into it before you eat it!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: JE on March 06, 2008, 08:20:32 PM
Klaas if anyone would know it would be you

Is there any official document or an article that says police have found a single one of jorans shoes with blood/mud and if so when?

plz humour me i know this has been discussed and i have done some research but i cant find anything but rumours


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: klaasend on March 06, 2008, 08:22:25 PM
Klaas if anyone would know it would be you

Is there any official document or an article that says police have found a single one of jorans shoes with blood/mud and if so when?

plz humour me i know this has been discussed and i have done some research but i cant find anything but rumours

I don't think there is anything official, at least not that I've seen.  The only thing I remember is postings in forums and blogs.  They did officially SEARCH for one or two shoes, they even had a "missing shoes" poster.  I'll try and find that.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: klaasend on March 06, 2008, 08:25:09 PM
Klaas if anyone would know it would be you

Is there any official document or an article that says police have found a single one of jorans shoes with blood/mud and if so when?

plz humour me i know this has been discussed and i have done some research but i cant find anything but rumours

I don't think there is anything official, at least not that I've seen.  The only thing I remember is postings in forums and blogs.  They did officially SEARCH for one or two shoes, they even had a "missing shoes" poster.  I'll try and find that.

http://www.riehlworldview.com/carnivorous_conservative/2005/07/natalee_hollowa_91.html

Natalee Holloway Update: Missing Shoe
I've been informed that at a press conference today investigators have asked anyone that may have information as regards a sneaker - K-SWISS (White and Blue) size 14 possibly seen or found near the Marriott or the Fisherman's Hut area to please contact the Police.
Earlier reports have suggested that a search at the home of Joran Va der Sloot turned up a shoe which may have been covered with mud, or muck. The shoe had no match. The last bit of information hasn't been independently confirmed.
Sunday, July 31, 2005 at 05:53 PM


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: JE on March 06, 2008, 08:26:59 PM
Klaas if anyone would know it would be you

Is there any official document or an article that says police have found a single one of jorans shoes with blood/mud and if so when?

plz humour me i know this has been discussed and i have done some research but i cant find anything but rumours

I don't think there is anything official, at least not that I've seen.  The only thing I remember is postings in forums and blogs.  They did officially SEARCH for one or two shoes, they even had a "missing shoes" poster.  I'll try and find that.

There was talk about police findig one in jorans closet but i cant find anything about it. I read the rumours and the hearsay etc i am trying to put a timeline on these shoes and need some details. any help appreciated thx


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 06, 2008, 08:27:39 PM
From Kyle:

This is a picture taken right next to the fisherman's hut that was allegedly broken into.  The picture shows the cut-away spot in the brush where we believe the trap was stored.  There are branches cut off and rub marks on other branches indicating a trap of at least 6-7' wide may have been in the spot.  The cut-away was symmetrical.   The trap we found was too large to fit inside the fish hut door (see attached picture of the fish hut door that was replaced after the break-in).  



(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/new_door_fishing_hut.jpg)


The trap is drawn in here to give you an idea.

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/trap_model_fishhuts.jpg)


Tim Miller
On the Record w/ Greta
February 27, 2008


MILLER: The report we got is the DNA that came back did not match Natalee's DNA and when we located that it looked like more than just a piece of cloth and I mean we, we felt as though we seen a skull in there. We got the Aruba authorities involved, they felt there was something in there, we dove on it and the thing is that's only 1 of over 170 targets out there we still have to investigate, so we've got a lot of work ahead of us.  

VAN SUSTEREN: Alright you said DNA, this was found in a crab trap below the surface in the water right?

MILLER:  It was in the water and Greta we was looking for a crab trap because we got reports that the night Natalee disappeared one of the fishermen's huts was broken into and a crab trap was stolen and I actually talked to a man there at the fishermen's huts, he verified about the hut being broken into and the crab trap being taken so it was really one of the things we was looking for.  In fact Chief Dompig told me 2-1/2 years ago in October when we was at the landfill that we needed to be out in the water, and he felt as though Natalee was put in a crab trap or some type of container ...


Quote from: oceanexploration on March 03, 2008, 06:35:58 PM
The trap was symmetrical in width and length at approximately 7.5 ft. It was approximately 2.25-2.5 ft high.  You're correct about the ROV video lens distorting perspective due to the paralax view lens.


Quote from: Tamikosmom on March 03, 2008, 08:20:24 PM
Dr. Hodges:

The fisherman described the cage as made of 3/8-inch iron (such as that used in concrete reinforcing—"rebar") with a frame size approximately 5 ½ feet by 4 feet by 17 inches. He described it as a large fishing cage with its frame wrapped in chicken wire with its familiar hexagonal openings but with an opening in one panel which allowed them to trap fish. He believed that, given its size and weight, it would take two men to manage the cage. Once aboard, it would lay low on the floor of the nearby fishing boat.
http://forensicthoughtprints.com/aruba/default.html
 

Gerold Dompig
'Scarborough Country'
October 25, 2005


DOMPIG: Well, that‘s basically the reason why we are looking at the ocean right now, because, although we don‘t have an official statement or declaration that a fishing trap has been missing, there are enough rumors out there that we—lead us to believe that maybe that is the case.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9827906/
 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: klaasend on March 06, 2008, 08:29:52 PM
Klaas if anyone would know it would be you

Is there any official document or an article that says police have found a single one of jorans shoes with blood/mud and if so when?

plz humour me i know this has been discussed and i have done some research but i cant find anything but rumours

I don't think there is anything official, at least not that I've seen.  The only thing I remember is postings in forums and blogs.  They did officially SEARCH for one or two shoes, they even had a "missing shoes" poster.  I'll try and find that.

http://www.riehlworldview.com/carnivorous_conservative/2005/07/natalee_hollowa_91.html

Natalee Holloway Update: Missing Shoe
I've been informed that at a press conference today investigators have asked anyone that may have information as regards a sneaker - K-SWISS (White and Blue) size 14 possibly seen or found near the Marriott or the Fisherman's Hut area to please contact the Police.
Earlier reports have suggested that a search at the home of Joran Va der Sloot turned up a shoe which may have been covered with mud, or muck. The shoe had no match. The last bit of information hasn't been independently confirmed.
Sunday, July 31, 2005 at 05:53 PM


http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0508/01/ng.01.html

SUSAN CANDIOTTI, CNN CORRESPONDENT: Well, I don`t think authorities want it to go cold. They`re really trying, they said, everything do to try to get to the bottom of this.

The latest information we have in that regard is that they`re putting out a public plea to look for -- remember all that talk about a shoe or a pair of shoes?

GRACE: Yes.

CANDIOTTI: Well, finally, confirmation that authorities are putting out a public request to be on the lookout, if you will, for a pair of sneakers that Joran, according to law enforcement authorities, claims that he might have lost the night that Natalee went missing, when he was on the beach with her, he said, at that fisherman`s hut area, which is near the Marriott and the Holiday Inn hotels.

Described as size 14, a pair of brand new sneakers. The brand is K- Swiss.

GRACE: Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, wait. Size 14, K-Swiss, are those...

CANDIOTTI: White and blue in color, that`s right. And they`re looking for this pair of brand new sneakers that he told police, as they stressed to me, in one of his many statements, that he might have lost this pair of shoes.

Again, they don`t know how much credence to put into this. And they said they have looking for this pair of shoes since the beginning, looked in his home, looked around the pond area that they`ve finished searching, looked around, and now they`re saying, all right, well, we`re putting out a public request now, if anyone possibly stumbles upon this pair of shoes.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Observer on March 06, 2008, 08:29:52 PM
Klaas if anyone would know it would be you

Is there any official document or an article that says police have found a single one of jorans shoes with blood/mud and if so when?

plz humour me i know this has been discussed and i have done some research but i cant find anything but rumours

The most credible report you will see is from Beth what she wrote in her Diary. Unfortunately much of the older News Videos are no longer available on the net when they were looking for one Shoe,as that would also be a good source of Info. Recently Fox made youtube take down all the older vids that were on youtube for copyright infringement so we don't even have those anymore. Greta also edited out a good portion of what was important on her website and at Fox News as well.  I seriously doubt there is a single document on the net that states they found one shoe with blood or mud on it. So much of what you will find is hearsay or what was told to Beth.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: dennisintn on March 06, 2008, 08:34:28 PM
Lazlo Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 6:49 pm    

Poentje Castro in contact with Hans Mos.

Van der Eem noemt naam
'Justitie verbiedt uitzenden fragment door Arubaanse zender'

Van der Eem mentiones name.
"LE on Aruba forbids broadcasting segment by Aruban channel"

Van der Eem werd, nadat hij zelf met de verborgen camera een bekentenis aan Joran van der Sloot ontfutselde, zelf ook stiekem gefilmd. Dat gebeurde na een interview met Castro voor de zender Tele Aruba. Afgelopen nacht tijd zijn delen van dit off-the-record gesprek op Aruba uitgezonden. Nieuwe Revu publiceerde gisteren op haar website een transcriptie van het in het Papiaments gevoerde gesprek.

Van der Eem was, after he himself managed to have Joran confess, also filmed secretly himself.
That took place after an interview with (Poentje) Castro for the channel Tele Aruba.
Last night parts of this off-the-records conversation were broadcasted in Aruba. Nieuwe Revu published on their website a transcript of the conversation which was in Papiamento.

De op Aruba bekende presentator Castro wil niets loslaten over het deel van het gesprek waarin Van der Eem inging op wat er met het lichaam van Holloway is gebeurd. "Dat heb ik afgesproken met officier van justitie Hans Mos." Het zou in ieder geval niet gaan om Daury, de naam die Van der Sloot begin februari in het programma van Peter R. de Vries noemde.

The on Aruba known host Castro does not want to let out anything about the part in which van der Eem goes into what happened with the body of Natalee Holloway. "That I have agreed upon with chief prosecutor Hans Mos".
It would at any rate not be Daury, the name that van der Sloot mentioned early February in the show of Peter R de Vries.

http://spitsnet.nl/nieuws.php/1/12572/online 


well, julia screwed up again.  mos stopped the broadcast and here old julia blames peter and patrick of threatening lives.  does she ever get anything right?  particularly where natalee is concerned.
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: JE on March 06, 2008, 08:37:59 PM
From Kyle:

This is a picture taken right next to the fisherman's hut that was allegedly broken into.  The picture shows the cut-away spot in the brush where we believe the trap was stored.  There are branches cut off and rub marks on other branches indicating a trap of at least 6-7' wide may have been in the spot.  The cut-away was symmetrical.   The trap we found was too large to fit inside the fish hut door (see attached picture of the fish hut door that was replaced after the break-in).  



(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/new_door_fishing_hut.jpg)


The trap is drawn in here to give you an idea.

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/trap_model_fishhuts.jpg)


Tim Miller
On the Record w/ Greta
February 27, 2008


MILLER: The report we got is the DNA that came back did not match Natalee's DNA and when we located that it looked like more than just a piece of cloth and I mean we, we felt as though we seen a skull in there. We got the Aruba authorities involved, they felt there was something in there, we dove on it and the thing is that's only 1 of over 170 targets out there we still have to investigate, so we've got a lot of work ahead of us.  

VAN SUSTEREN: Alright you said DNA, this was found in a crab trap below the surface in the water right?

MILLER:  It was in the water and Greta we was looking for a crab trap because we got reports that the night Natalee disappeared one of the fishermen's huts was broken into and a crab trap was stolen and I actually talked to a man there at the fishermen's huts, he verified about the hut being broken into and the crab trap being taken so it was really one of the things we was looking for.  In fact Chief Dompig told me 2-1/2 years ago in October when we was at the landfill that we needed to be out in the water, and he felt as though Natalee was put in a crab trap or some type of container ...


Quote from: oceanexploration on March 03, 2008, 06:35:58 PM
The trap was symmetrical in width and length at approximately 7.5 ft. It was approximately 2.25-2.5 ft high.  You're correct about the ROV video lens distorting perspective due to the paralax view lens.


Quote from: Tamikosmom on March 03, 2008, 08:20:24 PM
Dr. Hodges:

The fisherman described the cage as made of 3/8-inch iron (such as that used in concrete reinforcing—"rebar") with a frame size approximately 5 ½ feet by 4 feet by 17 inches. He described it as a large fishing cage with its frame wrapped in chicken wire with its familiar hexagonal openings but with an opening in one panel which allowed them to trap fish. He believed that, given its size and weight, it would take two men to manage the cage. Once aboard, it would lay low on the floor of the nearby fishing boat.
http://forensicthoughtprints.com/aruba/default.html
 

Gerold Dompig
'Scarborough Country'
October 25, 2005


DOMPIG: Well, that‘s basically the reason why we are looking at the ocean right now, because, although we don‘t have an official statement or declaration that a fishing trap has been missing, there are enough rumors out there that we—lead us to believe that maybe that is the case.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9827906/
 


In fact Chief Dompig told me 2-1/2 years ago in October when we was at the landfill that we needed to be out in the water, and he felt as though Natalee was put in a crab trap or some type of container ...

now he knows

DOMPIG: Well, that‘s basically the reason why we are looking at the ocean right now, because, although we don‘t have an official statement or declaration that a fishing trap has been missing, there are enough rumors out there that we—lead us to believe that maybe that is the case

now he dont know for sure


The fisherman also noticed that a large fishing cage stored behind the first of the three Fisherman's Huts at the southern-most corner was missing. The cage had been there approximately a month since about Good Friday, March 25, 2005. The cage belonged to another fisherman who kept his boat next to these four huts. The boat was still there. But the cage was missing


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: klaasend on March 06, 2008, 08:42:05 PM
More on the missing shoe (s):

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8798488/

SCARBOROUGH:  Explain to us about Joran van der Sloot‘s shoes and how that actually is now a part of this investigation. 

KOSINSKI:  Police have been pretty tightlipped about this.  There have been rumors about them looking for a shoe in various places.  Today, we know from police they‘re actually looking for a pair of sneakers, K-Swiss blue and white striped sneaker.  We even know the size, size 14.  So, they put out some detail there. 

We know that, when they drained that field and pond, we‘d been told that they were looking for something like that, some evidence.  They won‘t go so far as to tell us that they think these were lost on the night Natalee disappeared.  But obviously they see them as having some potential evidentiary value because they‘ve been looking for them, they tell us, along beaches, other locations on this island.  And they want those sneakers found.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: ala_gunslinger on March 06, 2008, 08:42:25 PM
From Kyle:

This is a picture taken right next to the fisherman's hut that was allegedly broken into.  The picture shows the cut-away spot in the brush where we believe the trap was stored.  There are branches cut off and rub marks on other branches indicating a trap of at least 6-7' wide may have been in the spot.  The cut-away was symmetrical.   The trap we found was too large to fit inside the fish hut door (see attached picture of the fish hut door that was replaced after the break-in).  



(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/new_door_fishing_hut.jpg)


The trap is drawn in here to give you an idea.

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/trap_model_fishhuts.jpg)


Tim Miller
On the Record w/ Greta
February 27, 2008


MILLER: The report we got is the DNA that came back did not match Natalee's DNA and when we located that it looked like more than just a piece of cloth and I mean we, we felt as though we seen a skull in there. We got the Aruba authorities involved, they felt there was something in there, we dove on it and the thing is that's only 1 of over 170 targets out there we still have to investigate, so we've got a lot of work ahead of us.  

VAN SUSTEREN: Alright you said DNA, this was found in a crab trap below the surface in the water right?

MILLER:  It was in the water and Greta we was looking for a crab trap because we got reports that the night Natalee disappeared one of the fishermen's huts was broken into and a crab trap was stolen and I actually talked to a man there at the fishermen's huts, he verified about the hut being broken into and the crab trap being taken so it was really one of the things we was looking for.  In fact Chief Dompig told me 2-1/2 years ago in October when we was at the landfill that we needed to be out in the water, and he felt as though Natalee was put in a crab trap or some type of container ...


Quote from: oceanexploration on March 03, 2008, 06:35:58 PM
The trap was symmetrical in width and length at approximately 7.5 ft. It was approximately 2.25-2.5 ft high.  You're correct about the ROV video lens distorting perspective due to the paralax view lens.


Quote from: Tamikosmom on March 03, 2008, 08:20:24 PM
Dr. Hodges:

The fisherman described the cage as made of 3/8-inch iron (such as that used in concrete reinforcing—"rebar") with a frame size approximately 5 ½ feet by 4 feet by 17 inches. He described it as a large fishing cage with its frame wrapped in chicken wire with its familiar hexagonal openings but with an opening in one panel which allowed them to trap fish. He believed that, given its size and weight, it would take two men to manage the cage. Once aboard, it would lay low on the floor of the nearby fishing boat.
http://forensicthoughtprints.com/aruba/default.html
 

Gerold Dompig
'Scarborough Country'
October 25, 2005


DOMPIG: Well, that‘s basically the reason why we are looking at the ocean right now, because, although we don‘t have an official statement or declaration that a fishing trap has been missing, there are enough rumors out there that we—lead us to believe that maybe that is the case.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9827906/
 


I hate to quote such a long post...

But ain't this a kick in the pants?!!!

Klaas, you have email at cox.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 06, 2008, 08:45:47 PM
Klaas if anyone would know it would be you

Is there any official document or an article that says police have found a single one of jorans shoes with blood/mud and if so when?

plz humour me i know this has been discussed and i have done some research but i cant find anything but rumours

The most credible report you will see is from Beth what she wrote in her Diary. Unfortunately much of the older News Videos are no longer available on the net when they were looking for one Shoe,as that would also be a good source of Info. Recently Fox made youtube take down all the older vids that were on youtube for copyright infringement so we don't even have those anymore. Greta also edited out a good portion of what was important on her website and at Fox News as well.  I seriously doubt there is a single document on the net that states they found one shoe with blood or mud on it. So much of what you will find is hearsay or what was told to Beth.

Beth Twitty
On the Record w/ Greta
December 6, 2005


TWITTY: You know Greta now that you mention it I was looking through my journal and there was an update from an FBI official and also from our family liaison that in one of Joran Van der Sloot's tennis shoes there was blood. I had written that down. I wish that I had been able to obtain more information as to what happened to that one shoe if that was truly blood in his shoe. You know Greta like I said we are just so limited in any type of information we can get.

VAN SUSTEREN: : Are you suggesting that they did find one of the pair of shoes and that they seized that?

TWITTY: Yes, when I was looking back through my notes there was a date where we received this information either from the FBI or our family liason that there was blood in Joran's tennis shoe.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: hotping on March 06, 2008, 08:48:30 PM
Kyle...I have a head cold also.....So maybe that is why I can't think straight right now .... Could You please tell Us why this picture of the Trap and Hut were posted tonight...What is the significance? Thank You In Advance!  ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Frijole on March 06, 2008, 08:49:45 PM
Klaas if anyone would know it would be you

Is there any official document or an article that says police have found a single one of jorans shoes with blood/mud and if so when?

plz humour me i know this has been discussed and i have done some research but i cant find anything but rumours


I don't think there is anything official, at least not that I've seen.  The only thing I remember is postings in forums and blogs.  They did officially SEARCH for one or two shoes, they even had a "missing shoes" poster.  I'll try and find that.

There was talk about police findig one in jorans closet but i cant find anything about it. I read the rumours and the hearsay etc i am trying to put a timeline on these shoes and need some details. any help appreciated thx
Hi! I'm sorry I can't link you to the transcript or video but I KNOW I heard this on TV and it was a quote from DOMPIG.  I heard it on either N Grace, Greta or Rita Cosby's show.  Any of you guys remember it?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Kat_Gram on March 06, 2008, 08:57:15 PM
I know that Patrick is not an innocent in the ways of the world, but he is playing with fire on Aruba. IMO ... There are too many people there who do have the power to do something to him and derail his life. If Greta etc could make millions in ratings dollars ( for the Joran lies interview ) and further their careers, I have no problem with someone who delivered the goods via the media writing a book and getting paid.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: ala_gunslinger on March 06, 2008, 09:00:52 PM
Kyle...I have a head cold also.....So maybe that is why I can't think straight right now .... Could You please tell Us why this picture of the Trap and Hut were posted tonight...What is the significance? Thank You In Advance!  ::MonkeyConfused::

Hot, I mean no disrespect.  Sometimes you just need to ask yourself....

WTF?

And consider what you know.

Did you see my suggested prescription posted for Kyle?

If not I would be more than happy to post it again, along with some preventative measures we can all take to avoid one during the upcoming ragweed season.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: ala_gunslinger on March 06, 2008, 09:03:04 PM
Klaas if anyone would know it would be you

Is there any official document or an article that says police have found a single one of jorans shoes with blood/mud and if so when?

plz humour me i know this has been discussed and i have done some research but i cant find anything but rumours


I don't think there is anything official, at least not that I've seen.  The only thing I remember is postings in forums and blogs.  They did officially SEARCH for one or two shoes, they even had a "missing shoes" poster.  I'll try and find that.

There was talk about police findig one in jorans closet but i cant find anything about it. I read the rumours and the hearsay etc i am trying to put a timeline on these shoes and need some details. any help appreciated thx
Hi! I'm sorry I can't link you to the transcript or video but I KNOW I heard this on TV and it was a quote from DOMPIG.  I heard it on either N Grace, Greta or Rita Cosby's show.  Any of you guys remember it?

I do my old friend!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: jackb on March 06, 2008, 09:13:11 PM
From Kyle:

This is a picture taken right next to the fisherman's hut that was allegedly broken into.  The picture shows the cut-away spot in the brush where we believe the trap was stored.  There are branches cut off and rub marks on other branches indicating a trap of at least 6-7' wide may have been in the spot.  The cut-away was symmetrical.   The trap we found was too large to fit inside the fish hut door (see attached picture of the fish hut door that was replaced after the break-in).  





(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/new_door_fishing_hut.jpg)


The trap is drawn in here to give you an idea.

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/trap_model_fishhuts.jpg)

Nothing is showing like a pictureon my screen here.     jack


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: jackb on March 06, 2008, 09:14:34 PM
From Kyle:

This is a picture taken right next to the fisherman's hut that was allegedly broken into.  The picture shows the cut-away spot in the brush where we believe the trap was stored.  There are branches cut off and rub marks on other branches indicating a trap of at least 6-7' wide may have been in the spot.  The cut-away was symmetrical.   The trap we found was too large to fit inside the fish hut door (see attached picture of the fish hut door that was replaced after the break-in).  





(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/new_door_fishing_hut.jpg)


The trap is drawn in here to give you an idea.

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/trap_model_fishhuts.jpg)

Nothing is showing like a pictureon my screen here.     jack

Where is the picture?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: hotping on March 06, 2008, 09:15:02 PM
Kyle...I have a head cold also.....So maybe that is why I can't think straight right now .... Could You please tell Us why this picture of the Trap and Hut were posted tonight...What is the significance? Thank You In Advance!  ::MonkeyConfused::

Hot, I mean no disrespect.  Sometimes you just need to ask yourself....

WTF?

And consider what you know.

Did you see my suggested prescription posted for Kyle?

If not I would be more than happy to post it again, along with some preventative measures we can all take to avoid one during the upcoming ragweed season.
Thanks  Gunslinger.....No You did not offend Me... I'm tougher than that...LOL....I'm just going to go with My first instincts... and Yes I saw Your suggested prescription...Thanks  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Observer on March 06, 2008, 09:15:37 PM

There was talk about police findig one in jorans closet but i cant find anything about it. I read the rumours and the hearsay etc i am trying to put a timeline on these shoes and need some details. any help appreciated thx
Hi! I'm sorry I can't link you to the transcript or video but I KNOW I heard this on TV and it was a quote from DOMPIG.  I heard it on either N Grace, Greta or Rita Cosby's show.  Any of you guys remember it?

I remember most of it because it what was being reported before the search of the pond. Someone posted a transcript last night about Nance joking about Joran hopping home with one shoe and that was a good report. Dompig most definetly said they were looking for one shoe and then later said it was a pair of shoes in late July/Aug. I searched a year ago for better information or something more substantial,but was unable to find anything more than what we have about one shoe with blood/mud on it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Buckeye on March 06, 2008, 09:23:45 PM
Kyle

I know you can't tell, but......did you, by any chance, notice any Honda carpeting or headliner in that cage??

I could see the pimps putting the cage in the fishermen's boat (that was right there) and taking it out Monday night before Beth got there.  They could have returned the boat before the fishermen came to work.

As for teleruba and Poncho or whatever his name is......there has been whining and moaning at some dark sites because the BIG medias won't give the time of day to the Gielen/Renfro/ Munzenhoffer propaganda. It is telling that Mos canceled his appearance and so did Jansen....and that was before the first nights show. The aim of the whole show was very clear.  I hope Poncho doesn't hold his breath for the big bucks.

PC (Poncho): bring a towel for me.. Let me tell you something, I am involucrated in this thing but I never did like this (inaudible) I have information that the police have and never used. I will aired it in this show.

PvdE: what kind of information? About him, Joran?

PC:No, about what also could have happen to Natalee Holloway and nobody bother to use this information. And this will I show this day, information that is..,..how old is this situation 3 years? The information is 2.5 have nearly 3 years old. Not that I want….., I don’t say he didn’t (inaudible) ….until this case is closed every possibility must remain open.


Now if that doesn't sound like the Rudy/Briesen story line....sheesh....

I think Patrick meant he's known about the story for several years (and Joran's part)...not that he's known Joran.

Thanks to caesu, EuRobert, katrien, JE, Jo-An and ciskebob for translations, summaries and interesting input.

Silverfox, interesting posts on drugs.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Buckeye on March 06, 2008, 09:30:24 PM
*******

I think jack means he can't see the picture on his monitor   :smt102


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: ala_gunslinger on March 06, 2008, 09:33:05 PM
Kyle...I have a head cold also.....So maybe that is why I can't think straight right now .... Could You please tell Us why this picture of the Trap and Hut were posted tonight...What is the significance? Thank You In Advance!  ::MonkeyConfused::

Hot, I mean no disrespect.  Sometimes you just need to ask yourself....

WTF?

And consider what you know.

Did you see my suggested prescription posted for Kyle?

If not I would be more than happy to post it again, along with some preventative measures we can all take to avoid one during the upcoming ragweed season.
Thanks  Gunslinger.....No You did not offend Me... I'm tougher than that...LOL....I'm just going to go with My first instincts... and Yes I saw Your suggested prescription...Thanks  ::MonkeyWink::

Very well, thank you for the reply!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: klaasend on March 06, 2008, 09:33:30 PM
Jackb - the picture shows up you may need to refresh your browser.  Here are the photobucket links..see if you can see them here:

http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/trap_model_fishhuts.jpg

http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/new_door_fishing_hut.jpg


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Observer on March 06, 2008, 09:34:53 PM
Yup..Shame they had to yank the program tonight..God forbid that Patrick would tell more about who dumped Natalee in the ocean like a old rag. I hope Patrick is paying attention what Julia Renfro is saying about him at RU.

==============================
Glenda  PostPosted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 7:00 pm         

woebedamned wrote:
IIRC Dugo said that is why Joran is responsible for what Peter aired...because he did not take legal action to stop the show from being broadcast. I assume Patrick did as much.


Dugo is right!

Joran did not try to stop the airing of his secretly taped conversation. He actually prior to the airing he said something about how he had just spoken to Patrick and that they were still friends, and let's wait and see what will be on the show.

Joran didn't threaten Patrick's life or threaten De Vries with a lawsuit.

Patrick on the other hand has threatened to kill Poentje if it is aired in Holland and De Vries has threatened to take legal action against TeleAruba if it is aired.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: JE on March 06, 2008, 09:36:16 PM
thx to all who replied to my shoe posts

i am aware that beth was told early on that blood/mud was found on one of jorans shoes. But since his house was searched on the 15th of june for the first time and there is no mention of a shoe being found during the search. Where oh where did this shoe with blood or mud come from. Joran claimed up to the 14th of june pv that he left em at the beach. Where did the cops get that one shoe or pair of shoes? PV june 9th he doesn t know for sure if he was wearing creme coloured boots or white shoes. PV june 14th i left kswiss size 14 blue and white shoes at the beach. i bought them in USA. To much detail for my taste. How could beth have known early on in the investigation that the kswiss were the shoes. Who told her? Size 14 is a very big shoe and as it turned out his shoe size was 10.5. I am curious to know if beth or ALE had this information about kswiss size 14 etc before june 14th. if so where did that info come from. Not from JVDS since he only remembered it so vividly only on june 14th. I m sorry if this post is hard to follow but its late and i ve been racking my brain on this. The only time that police could have found a shoe would be during the house search, but if this was the case why would JVDS have remembered these same details just one day before?

One more thing a friend of mine who is a police officer was over tonight. I asked him if asking about seizures or heart attacks was standard procedure in a missing person case. He said no we ask about the use of prescription medice but not specificaly about seizures or heart attacks.

In aruba your mileage may vary


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Observer on March 06, 2008, 09:36:24 PM
*******

I think jack means he can't see the picture on his monitor   :smt102
::MonkeyEek:: Yup,I caught that and erased my post! But you saw it before I did it  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: ala_gunslinger on March 06, 2008, 09:37:07 PM
Kyle

I know you can't tell, but......did you, by any chance, notice any Honda carpeting or headliner in that cage??

I could see the pimps putting the cage in the fishermen's boat (that was right there) and taking it out Monday night before Beth got there.  They could have returned the boat before the fishermen came to work.

As for teleruba and Poncho or whatever his name is......there has been whining and moaning at some dark sites because the BIG medias won't give the time of day to the Gielen/Renfro/ Munzenhoffer propaganda. It is telling that Mos canceled his appearance and so did Jansen....and that was before the first nights show. The aim of the whole show was very clear.  I hope Poncho doesn't hold his breath for the big bucks.

PC (Poncho): bring a towel for me.. Let me tell you something, I am involucrated in this thing but I never did like this (inaudible) I have information that the police have and never used. I will aired it in this show.

PvdE: what kind of information? About him, Joran?

PC:No, about what also could have happen to Natalee Holloway and nobody bother to use this information. And this will I show this day, information that is..,..how old is this situation 3 years? The information is 2.5 have nearly 3 years old. Not that I want….., I don’t say he didn’t (inaudible) ….until this case is closed every possibility must remain open.


Now if that doesn't sound like the Rudy/Briesen story line....sheesh....

I think Patrick meant he's known about the story for several years (and Joran's part)...not that he's known Joran.

Thanks to caesu, EuRobert, katrien, JE, Jo-An and ciskebob for translations, summaries and interesting input.

Silverfox, interesting posts on drugs.

Post of the day alert!!!!!


These should be saved to a separate folder.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: ala_gunslinger on March 06, 2008, 09:39:20 PM
Yup..Shame they had to yank the program tonight..God forbid that Patrick would tell more about who dumped Natalee in the ocean like a old rag. I hope Patrick is paying attention what they are saying about him at RU.

==============================
Glenda  PostPosted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 7:00 pm         

woebedamned wrote:
IIRC Dugo said that is why Joran is responsible for what Peter aired...because he did not take legal action to stop the show from being broadcast. I assume Patrick did as much.


Dugo is right!

Joran did not try to stop the airing of his secretly taped conversation. He actually prior to the airing he said something about how he had just spoken to Patrick and that they were still friends, and let's wait and see what will be on the show.

Joran didn't threaten Patrick's life or threaten De Vries with a lawsuit.

Patrick on the other hand has threatened to kill Poentje if it is aired in Holland and De Vries has threatened to take legal action against TeleAruba if it is aired.

I believe someone may have actually found a clue!!!!!

OMG!!!


ARMAGEDDON!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: ala_gunslinger on March 06, 2008, 09:41:28 PM
Good night ya'll.

Remember, think outside the bun!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 06, 2008, 09:48:21 PM
If those pictures don't serve as a powerful catalyst to get the money flowing to help get a search team back to Aruba, I don't know what will.

How much would it take to get back there and finish the target assesment? With 15-20 targets aquired visually each day it will only take a few weeks to go through the rest of the list.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: billb's daughter on March 06, 2008, 09:48:59 PM
From Kyle:

This is a picture taken right next to the fisherman's hut that was allegedly broken into.  The picture shows the cut-away spot in the brush where we believe the trap was stored.  There are branches cut off and rub marks on other branches indicating a trap of at least 6-7' wide may have been in the spot.  The cut-away was symmetrical.   The trap we found was too large to fit inside the fish hut door (see attached picture of the fish hut door that was replaced after the break-in).  



(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/new_door_fishing_hut.jpg)


The trap is drawn in here to give you an idea.

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/trap_model_fishhuts.jpg)

So, if I understand this right, it IS possible that the trap in the Dateline video MAY have been the trap stolen from the fish hut??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: jackb on March 06, 2008, 09:50:32 PM
From Kyle:

This is a picture taken right next to the fisherman's hut that was allegedly broken into.  The picture shows the cut-away spot in the brush where we believe the trap was stored.  There are branches cut off and rub marks on other branches indicating a trap of at least 6-7' wide may have been in the spot.  The cut-away was symmetrical.   The trap we found was too large to fit inside the fish hut door (see attached picture of the fish hut door that was replaced after the break-in).  





(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/new_door_fishing_hut.jpg)


The trap is drawn in here to give you an idea.

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/trap_model_fishhuts.jpg)

Nothing is showing like a pictureon my screen here.     jack

Where is the picture?
  Why is a hunk out of my picture on the right (my right) top?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Observer on March 06, 2008, 09:54:13 PM
From Kyle:

So, if I understand this right, it IS possible that the trap in the Dateline video MAY have been the trap stolen from the fish hut??

I think it's possible,but the trap that was reported stolen was a bit smaller.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: texasmom on March 06, 2008, 09:55:13 PM
Good night ya'll.

Remember, think outside the bun!

goodnight 'gunslinger!   ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 06, 2008, 09:59:06 PM
The trap still intrigues me. It is possible that the one found could have been the one that was stolen, but based on what we know thus far, it likely did not contain remains related to this case. However, I think its possible it COULD have contained other items of evidence.

Then again, if that is true, one has to ask the question why go through so much trouble to dispose of clothes, shoes, etc., in such a manner.

THe bottom lines is I don't think the cage we are looking for has been found yet.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: klaasend on March 06, 2008, 10:02:42 PM
Jackb - that is how Kyle sent it to me.  I have no idea why the white square in the upper right hand corner.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: hotping on March 06, 2008, 10:22:31 PM
Klaas When You have time Could You please give TexasMom My email please....TIA  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: billb's daughter on March 06, 2008, 10:23:54 PM
The trap still intrigues me. It is possible that the one found could have been the one that was stolen, but based on what we know thus far, it likely did not contain remains related to this case. However, I think its possible it COULD have contained other items of evidence.

Then again, if that is true, one has to ask the question why go through so much trouble to dispose of clothes, shoes, etc., in such a manner.

THe bottom lines is I don't think the cage we are looking for has been found yet.
Bladerunner...what you say makes sense, but I can't stop thinking the knife/machete rope, etc and maybe other evidence (tennis shoe(s) any other evidence) may have been hastily disposed of in the trap and taken out that night. Natalee may have also been buried near the fish hut and later moved (landfill, water, incinerated??). I guess in this order: they buried Natalee first, then realized they needed to dispose of evidence-thats where the trap comes into play. They probably wouldn't think to take it too far out that night, thus the 90 ft depth. JMO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 06, 2008, 10:23:58 PM
thx to all who replied to my shoe posts

i am aware that beth was told early on that blood/mud was found on one of jorans shoes. But since his house was searched on the 15th of june for the first time and there is no mention of a shoe being found during the search. Where oh where did this shoe with blood or mud come from. Joran claimed up to the 14th of june pv that he left em at the beach. Where did the cops get that one shoe or pair of shoes? PV june 9th he doesn t know for sure if he was wearing creme coloured boots or white shoes. PV june 14th i left kswiss size 14 blue and white shoes at the beach. i bought them in USA. To much detail for my taste. How could beth have known early on in the investigation that the kswiss were the shoes. Who told her? Size 14 is a very big shoe and as it turned out his shoe size was 10.5. I am curious to know if beth or ALE had this information about kswiss size 14 etc before june 14th. if so where did that info come from. Not from JVDS since he only remembered it so vividly only on june 14th. I m sorry if this post is hard to follow but its late and i ve been racking my brain on this. The only time that police could have found a shoe would be during the house search, but if this was the case why would JVDS have remembered these same details just one day before?

One more thing a friend of mine who is a police officer was over tonight. I asked him if asking about seizures or heart attacks was standard procedure in a missing person case. He said no we ask about the use of prescription medice but not specificaly about seizures or heart attacks.

In aruba your mileage may vary


What your cop friend says makes a heck of a lot more sense, JE.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 06, 2008, 10:29:38 PM

well, julia screwed up again.  mos stopped the broadcast and here old julia blames peter and patrick of threatening lives.  does she ever get anything right?  particularly where natalee is concerned.
dennisintn


There is a reason the major media is avoiding Renfro and Gielen.

They now all know every time they open their mouths shit comes out.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: klaasend on March 06, 2008, 10:30:22 PM
Klaas When You have time Could You please give TexasMom My email please....TIA  ::MonkeyWink::

Done!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Sea Searcher on March 06, 2008, 10:30:45 PM
Hi All...

I'm trying to catch up and could use a little help..

The tele-aruba show was cancelled because
a. The ALE won't allow the show to air (MOS)
b. Patrick has threatened to kill the host if it airs.
c. Peter DeVries has threatened legal action if it airs
d All of the above

I'm not the sharpest knife in the drawer and am very confused  ::MonkeyConfused::

Also Kyle has posted a picture of some trees with a sketch
of the cage shown in the unimportant pictures sent to the FBI then put on the
internet by Robin? For what reason?

I'm really lost here...anyone?

Thanks


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: klaasend on March 06, 2008, 10:31:19 PM

well, julia screwed up again.  mos stopped the broadcast and here old julia blames peter and patrick of threatening lives.  does she ever get anything right?  particularly where natalee is concerned.
dennisintn


There is a reason the major media is avoiding Renfro and Gielen.

They now all know every time they open their mouths shit comes out.



Very true   ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Buckeye on March 06, 2008, 10:31:33 PM
JE

I do remember seeing Dave, being interviewed during the draining of the pond.  I think it was Soemers (ALE) interviewed, with him, that mentioned a "pair" of shoes.  I know that doesn't help with the single shoe and Beth's statement.   Welcome to the real world of "the shoe/shoes" investigation.  The big question is why did they make an issue out of it?  Shoe prints?  A comment by a maid that she saw blood?  a comment he was kicking Natalee??  Just speculating....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: hotping on March 06, 2008, 10:33:12 PM
Klaas When You have time Could You please give TexasMom My email please....TIA  ::MonkeyWink::

Done!
Thank You!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: klaasend on March 06, 2008, 10:33:36 PM
Hi All...

I'm trying to catch up and could use a little help..

The tele-aruba show was cancelled because
a. The ALE won't allow the show to air (MOS)
b. Patrick has threatened to kill the host if it airs.
c. Peter DeVries has threatened legal action if it airs
d All of the above

I'm not the sharpest knife in the drawer and am very confused  ::MonkeyConfused::

Also Kyle has posted a picture of some trees with a sketch
of the cage shown in the unimportant pictures sent to the FBI then put on the
internet by Robin? For what reason?

I'm really lost here...anyone?

Thanks

Not sure, maybe all of the above.

I think Kyle just wanted to show us where the trap would have been behind the FH.  You should ask Kyle why he wanted them posted though  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Observer on March 06, 2008, 10:34:30 PM
Hi All...

I'm trying to catch up and could use a little help..

The tele-aruba show was cancelled because
a. The ALE won't allow the show to air (MOS)
b. Patrick has threatened to kill the host if it airs.
c. Peter DeVries has threatened legal action if it airs
d All of the above


B and C were said by Julia Renfro so I wouldnt trust it at all.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 06, 2008, 10:35:38 PM

It's good to be back home, although the change in climate gave me a wicked head cold.  I was told today that the Persistence was already in Mexico, well ahead of schedule. 

Hope you feel better soon Kyle!  Great to hear that the Persistence is ahead of schedule on the trip home, I know they are anxious to be with their families.  Try some chicken noodle soup for that cold.  The climate here in Texas changes about every 12 hours these days.  Spring flowers and trees are blooming and they are predicting freezing temperatures, sleet and snow for tonight and tomorrow.  I had the air conditioner on last night! 


Zinc, Stinging Nettles and Golden Seal will clear that head cold right up, Kyle.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Buckeye on March 06, 2008, 10:36:35 PM
Still thinking shoes...

If Joran told Freddy what happened early Monday am, or Freddy was involved.  Maybe Freddy told Joran he needed to get rid of his shoes because they would see his prints by the mangroves/racquet club/bird sanctuary/wherever (because Natalee was hidden).  Joran whines but they are my good shoes...from the states....Freddy says, I'll buy you a new pair...get rid of them...and stretch your feet.... ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Buckeye on March 06, 2008, 10:38:21 PM
Jackb - that is how Kyle sent it to me.  I have no idea why the white square in the upper right hand corner.

Watermark..removed???   :smt102


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 06, 2008, 10:38:36 PM
Hi All...

I'm trying to catch up and could use a little help..

The tele-aruba show was cancelled because
a. The ALE won't allow the show to air (MOS)
b. Patrick has threatened to kill the host if it airs.
c. Peter DeVries has threatened legal action if it airs
d All of the above


B and C were said by Julia Renfro so I wouldnt trust it at all.


And that rules D out as well. Hans must have the hammer down on this for what reason we can only guess because he is about as effective as a one legged man in a butt kickin' contest.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Buckeye on March 06, 2008, 10:42:54 PM
Hi All...

I'm trying to catch up and could use a little help..

The tele-aruba show was cancelled because
a. The ALE won't allow the show to air (MOS)
b. Patrick has threatened to kill the host if it airs.
c. Peter DeVries has threatened legal action if it airs
d All of the above


B and C were said by Julia Renfro so I wouldnt trust it at all.


And that rules D out as well. Hans must have the hammer down on this for what reason we can only guess because he is about as effective as a one legged man in a butt kickin' contest.

 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 06, 2008, 10:44:07 PM
The trap still intrigues me. It is possible that the one found could have been the one that was stolen, but based on what we know thus far, it likely did not contain remains related to this case. However, I think its possible it COULD have contained other items of evidence.

Then again, if that is true, one has to ask the question why go through so much trouble to dispose of clothes, shoes, etc., in such a manner.

THe bottom lines is I don't think the cage we are looking for has been found yet.
Bladerunner...what you say makes sense, but I can't stop thinking the knife/machete rope, etc and maybe other evidence (tennis shoe(s) any other evidence) may have been hastily disposed of in the trap and taken out that night. Natalee may have also been buried near the fish hut and later moved (landfill, water, incinerated??). I guess in this order: they buried Natalee first, then realized they needed to dispose of evidence-thats where the trap comes into play. They probably wouldn't think to take it too far out that night, thus the 90 ft depth. JMO


I'm liking it. But have to wonder why such a large trap for such a few items. Why not bury them, too? Just playing the devil's advocate here, Billb, anything is possible in this case.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Kiwi on March 06, 2008, 10:47:11 PM
Hi all- Here is something that may be important. Did Ale actually check the fishermans boat to see if any of Natalee's DNA could be found or blood. Its possible the boat that could transport a trap was sitting there all along. Next question did they keep the keys in the hut?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 06, 2008, 10:48:49 PM
The trap still intrigues me. It is possible that the one found could have been the one that was stolen, but based on what we know thus far, it likely did not contain remains related to this case. However, I think its possible it COULD have contained other items of evidence.

Then again, if that is true, one has to ask the question why go through so much trouble to dispose of clothes, shoes, etc., in such a manner.

THe bottom lines is I don't think the cage we are looking for has been found yet.
Bladerunner...what you say makes sense, but I can't stop thinking the knife/machete rope, etc and maybe other evidence (tennis shoe(s) any other evidence) may have been hastily disposed of in the trap and taken out that night. Natalee may have also been buried near the fish hut and later moved (landfill, water, incinerated??). I guess in this order: they buried Natalee first, then realized they needed to dispose of evidence-thats where the trap comes into play. They probably wouldn't think to take it too far out that night, thus the 90 ft depth. JMO

That scenario could very well have happened. If your pressed for time you might not think to go out too far either. Are you thinking that a fisherman's boat was involved or a "freinds boat?"


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: texasmom on March 06, 2008, 10:50:11 PM
From Kyle:

This is a picture taken right next to the fisherman's hut that was allegedly broken into.  The picture shows the cut-away spot in the brush where we believe the trap was stored.  There are branches cut off and rub marks on other branches indicating a trap of at least 6-7' wide may have been in the spot.  The cut-away was symmetrical.   The trap we found was too large to fit inside the fish hut door (see attached picture of the fish hut door that was replaced after the break-in).  



(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/new_door_fishing_hut.jpg)


The trap is drawn in here to give you an idea.

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/trap_model_fishhuts.jpg)

no one ever said the trap was inside the huts

from hodges site:

 The fisherman also noticed that a large fishing cage stored behind the first of the three Fisherman's Huts at the southern-most corner was missing. The cage had been there approximately a month since about Good Friday, March 25, 2005. The cage belonged to another fisherman who kept his boat next to these four huts. The boat was still there. But the cage was missing.

The fisherman described the cage as made of 3/8-inch iron (such as that used in concrete reinforcing—"rebar") with a frame size approximately 5 ½ feet by 4 feet by 17 inches. He described it as a large fishing cage with its frame wrapped in chicken wire with its familiar hexagonal openings but with an opening in one panel which allowed them to trap fish. He believed that, given its size and weight, it would take two men to manage the cage. Once aboard, it would lay low on the floor of the nearby fishing boat.

JE, OE was here when the cage was being discussed on 3/1.  The opinion of one or more monkeys was that the cage that was taken was inside the fisherman's huts.  I remember because I posted a portion from the Hodges site in response.  I don't know if that was the purpose of his posting the pictures and explanation this evening or not.  Just thought you might have missed that discussion.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 06, 2008, 10:50:58 PM
JE

I do remember seeing Dave, being interviewed during the draining of the pond.  I think it was Soemers (ALE) interviewed, with him, that mentioned a "pair" of shoes.  I know that doesn't help with the single shoe and Beth's statement.   Welcome to the real world of "the shoe/shoes" investigation.  The big question is why did they make an issue out of it?  Shoe prints?  A comment by a maid that she saw blood?  a comment he was kicking Natalee??  Just speculating....


If it was just shoe prints I don't think Joran would have been worried about it. After all, he said they went to the beach. IMO there had to be some incriminating evidence on those shoes. Kicking or choking her would cause bleeding or vomiting, he is known to be an agressive individual and to have killed animals. In fact, he is an animal.

The shoes have been the Ground Hog's Day of this investigation for sure, Buckeye.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Kiwi on March 06, 2008, 10:55:16 PM
From Kyle:

This is a picture taken right next to the fisherman's hut that was allegedly broken into.  The picture shows the cut-away spot in the brush where we believe the trap was stored.  There are branches cut off and rub marks on other branches indicating a trap of at least 6-7' wide may have been in the spot.  The cut-away was symmetrical.   The trap we found was too large to fit inside the fish hut door (see attached picture of the fish hut door that was replaced after the break-in).  



(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/new_door_fishing_hut.jpg)


The trap is drawn in here to give you an idea.

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/trap_model_fishhuts.jpg)

no one ever said the trap was inside the huts

from hodges site:

 The fisherman also noticed that a large fishing cage stored behind the first of the three Fisherman's Huts at the southern-most corner was missing. The cage had been there approximately a month since about Good Friday, March 25, 2005. The cage belonged to another fisherman who kept his boat next to these four huts. The boat was still there. But the cage was missing.

The fisherman described the cage as made of 3/8-inch iron (such as that used in concrete reinforcing—"rebar") with a frame size approximately 5 ½ feet by 4 feet by 17 inches. He described it as a large fishing cage with its frame wrapped in chicken wire with its familiar hexagonal openings but with an opening in one panel which allowed them to trap fish. He believed that, given its size and weight, it would take two men to manage the cage. Once aboard, it would lay low on the floor of the nearby fishing boat.

JE, OE was here when the cage was being discussed on 3/1.  The opinion of one or more monkeys was that the cage that was taken was inside the fisherman's huts.  I remember because I posted a portion from the Hodges site in response.  I don't know if that was the purpose of his posting the pictures and explanation this evening or not.  Just thought you might have missed that discussion.
If who ever Joran called could have broke into the hut looking for the key to the fishing boat parked by the hut. If they returned it back to its mooring it would appear that it was never moved. Plus no need to find a boat that could hold the trap.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 06, 2008, 10:55:57 PM
Hi all- Here is something that may be important. Did Ale actually check the fishermans boat to see if any of Natalee's DNA could be found or blood. Its possible the boat that could transport a trap was sitting there all along. Next question did they keep the keys in the hut?


That begs the question, did ALE check anything? There are lots of boats not far away at the moorings in front of the hotels and rumor has it Koen Gottenbos had his boat parked there. There are very few put-in points where he lives on the north end of the island.

ALE and Karin Jannsen refused to interview him causing Asst. Prosecutor Amylin Flanigan to quit the investigation.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Sea Searcher on March 06, 2008, 10:59:30 PM
Hi All...

I'm trying to catch up and could use a little help..

The tele-aruba show was cancelled because
a. The ALE won't allow the show to air (MOS)
b. Patrick has threatened to kill the host if it airs.
c. Peter DeVries has threatened legal action if it airs
d All of the above


B and C were said by Julia Renfro so I wouldnt trust it at all.


And that rules D out as well. Hans must have the hammer down on this for what reason we can only guess because he is about as effective as a one legged man in a butt kickin' contest.

Thank to All who responded...

I never trusted MOS since I hear (read) him say "we have proof she's dead and
everyday that passes is more proof" something like that..duh

but my a. came from a good source? I will never understand their (so called) system but
I take it that there's no freedom of the press...govt. controlled TV... one of the thousands
of reasons I love America...

Kyle can't answer questions about the search so asking him is more frustrating..what
he and the whole team did was incredible but I'm lost as to why they would pack and
go home just as they were getting so close to the end...it would seem more costly
to leave and come back later if funding was needed but that's their choice to make. I
can't begin to imagine the whole cost of what they've done already.
Did anyone call Bill Gates  ::MonkeyWink:: a million or two is pocket change for him..

Thanks again for the help..



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 06, 2008, 11:04:19 PM
The trap still intrigues me. It is possible that the one found could have been the one that was stolen, but based on what we know thus far, it likely did not contain remains related to this case. However, I think its possible it COULD have contained other items of evidence.

Then again, if that is true, one has to ask the question why go through so much trouble to dispose of clothes, shoes, etc., in such a manner.

THe bottom lines is I don't think the cage we are looking for has been found yet.
Bladerunner...what you say makes sense, but I can't stop thinking the knife/machete rope, etc and maybe other evidence (tennis shoe(s) any other evidence) may have been hastily disposed of in the trap and taken out that night. Natalee may have also been buried near the fish hut and later moved (landfill, water, incinerated??). I guess in this order: they buried Natalee first, then realized they needed to dispose of evidence-thats where the trap comes into play. They probably wouldn't think to take it too far out that night, thus the 90 ft depth. JMO


I'm liking it. But have to wonder why such a large trap for such a few items. Why not bury them, too? Just playing the devil's advocate here, Billb, anything is possible in this case.

The size of the cage leads one to believe that the cage--and whatever might have been inside--most likely went into the sea that night, since transporting it around the island would have be ackward and risky.

If it didn't go into the sea that night that would mean they would have had to have secured a vehicle capable of transporting it and a place to hide it out of view.

If they did stash it first somehwere--xtc house maybe--then they would also have had to of transported it once again in order to bring it to a boat. And at that time it would be full of "evidence." This double move scenario seems highly unlikely and since we know the trap has not turned up, it has to be in the ocean. If it is within the search grid, we know the rover will find it.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Buckeye on March 06, 2008, 11:04:43 PM
Sea Searcher

I think I saw Bill Gate's name, on another site, as being contacted.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Kiwi on March 06, 2008, 11:08:17 PM
Hi all- Here is something that may be important. Did Ale actually check the fishermans boat to see if any of Natalee's DNA could be found or blood. Its possible the boat that could transport a trap was sitting there all along. Next question did they keep the keys in the hut?


That begs the question, did ALE check anything? There are lots of boats not far away at the moorings in front of the hotels and rumor has it Koen Gottenbos had his boat parked there. There are very few put-in points where he lives on the north end of the island.

ALE and Karin Jannsen refused to interview him causing Asst. Prosecutor Amylin Flanigan to quit the investigation.

It would be interesting if the keys were kept inside the hut.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Buckeye on March 06, 2008, 11:08:17 PM
Bladerunner

If they only his Natalee the first night....maybe in bushes with thorns or branches (causing scratches on Guido and Joran...or Joran's sore legs), they could have come back Monday evening...the night he purposely wanted to be seen on the casino camera...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Buckeye on March 06, 2008, 11:10:29 PM
If it happened Sunday night, the fishermen were there and would have seen them.....must have been the next night...or after fishermen went home.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: jackb on March 06, 2008, 11:11:52 PM

well, julia screwed up again.  mos stopped the broadcast and here old julia blames peter and patrick of threatening lives.  does she ever get anything right?  particularly where natalee is concerned.
dennisintn


There is a reason the major media is avoiding Renfro and Gielen.

They now all know every time they open their mouths shit comes out.



'Cause they are talking out of their azzes (donkeys.)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Observer on March 06, 2008, 11:12:12 PM
   
Van der Eem mentions name
(Traslation)
'Justice prohibits broadcasting fragment by Aruban transmitter'
Thursday, March 6, 2008 at 22:31

AMSTERDAM - Patrick van der Eem claims to know who Natalee Holloway has been thrown into the sea. That he said after a interviewprogramma the Aruban television, not knowing that there was a camera. According presenter Poentje Castro asked the public prosecutor in Aruba is not the fragment to broadcast, in which Van der Eem this name called.

By Jan Willem Navis


Van der Eem was after he himself with a hidden camera confession to Joran van der Sloot ontfutselde, also secretly filmed. That happened after an interview with Castro for the channel Tele Aruba. Last night time parts of this off-the-record interview broadcast on Aruba. Nieuwe Revu published yesterday on its website a transcript of the interview in the Papiaments implemented.

The Aruba known presenter Castro wants nothing release on the part of the interview in which Van der Eem procedure on how to handle the body of Holloway has happened."I have agreed with prosecutor Hans Mos." It would in any case not be Daury, the name Van der Sloot early February in the programme of Peter R. De Vries said.

Already circulating on the Internet a few days after the regular excerpts broadcast in the geniep with a small camera. The programme put the images on YouTube as prior to the broadcast of tonight.

"Van der Eem told that off-the-record portion a totally different story than when ordinary camera aanstond" says Castro. "In the broadcast did he pretended he did this for the Arubans, then he said that he did it for the money. He would be one million euro will earn." Van der Eem is working on a book about the affair, and got De Vries 25 thousand euros for his cooperation in the program.

The transcription of New Revu sounds by that Joran and Van der Eem each other for years. According to Castro is that a wrong interpretation, and it was Van der Eem precisely with Peter R. De Vries friends. The misdaadjournalist denies this. "If he knows me a long time is that of the television."

Patrick van der Eem wanted last night not respond. "Just what is broadcast tonight." Justice in Aruba wants nothing more than say that there are still investigation into what happened on the night that Holloway disappeared.

http://spitsnet.nl/nieuws.php/1/12572/online/van_der_eem_noemt_naam.html?p=rubriek1


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 06, 2008, 11:12:37 PM
Bladerunner

If they only his Natalee the first night....maybe in bushes with thorns or branches (causing scratches on Guido and Joran...or Joran's sore legs), they could have come back Monday evening...the night he purposely wanted to be seen on the casino camera...

Ok, I'm forgetting the timeline here, when is the cage supposed to have been stolen and when was it reported stolen?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: jackb on March 06, 2008, 11:13:15 PM
Hi All...

I'm trying to catch up and could use a little help..

The tele-aruba show was cancelled because
a. The ALE won't allow the show to air (MOS)
b. Patrick has threatened to kill the host if it airs.
c. Peter DeVries has threatened legal action if it airs
d All of the above

I'm not the sharpest knife in the drawer and am very confused  ::MonkeyConfused::

Also Kyle has posted a picture of some trees with a sketch
of the cage shown in the unimportant pictures sent to the FBI then put on the
internet by Robin? For what reason?

I'm really lost here...anyone?

Thanks

Robin wanted me to see them and analyze them.  LOL  Jackb


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: hotping on March 06, 2008, 11:13:16 PM
If it happened Sunday night, the fishermen were there and would have seen them.....must have been the next night...or after fishermen went home.
So Monday night would have been when Beth arrived and saw Joran and Deepak and they were not dressed like they had been to the casino...right?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: jackb on March 06, 2008, 11:17:07 PM
Hi All...

I'm trying to catch up and could use a little help..

The tele-aruba show was cancelled because
a. The ALE won't allow the show to air (MOS)
b. Patrick has threatened to kill the host if it airs.
c. Peter DeVries has threatened legal action if it airs
d All of the above

I'm not the sharpest knife in the drawer and am very confused  ::MonkeyConfused::

Also Kyle has posted a picture of some trees with a sketch
of the cage shown in the unimportant pictures sent to the FBI then put on the
internet by Robin? For what reason?

I'm really lost here...anyone?

Thanks

Robin wanted me to see them and analyze them.  LOL  Jackb
  I am worse after pics than a dog after a frisbie.  j/b


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 06, 2008, 11:19:06 PM

The size of the cage leads one to believe that the cage--and whatever might have been inside--most likely went into the sea that night, since transporting it around the island would have be ackward and risky.

If it didn't go into the sea that night that would mean they would have had to have secured a vehicle capable of transporting it and a place to hide it out of view.

If they did stash it first somehwere--xtc house maybe--then they would also have had to of transported it once again in order to bring it to a boat. And at that time it would be full of "evidence." This double move scenario seems highly unlikely and since we know the trap has not turned up, it has to be in the ocean. If it is within the search grid, we know the rover will find it.




Agree with you here wholeheartedly, no way they are toting a trap like that around the island. Steve Croes would have a lot of knowledge about the huts, traps, and how to move them and if ALE haven't disappeared it there is supposed to be a call to him from a Van der Sloot phone around 6:30 am that morning. That would be the call that Paulus told Greta he can't remember whether he made or not.

I find it amazing that Paulus' memories fail him so much on what happens to the the most monumentally significant day of he and his son's lives.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: billb's daughter on March 06, 2008, 11:20:17 PM
The trap still intrigues me. It is possible that the one found could have been the one that was stolen, but based on what we know thus far, it likely did not contain remains related to this case. However, I think its possible it COULD have contained other items of evidence.

Then again, if that is true, one has to ask the question why go through so much trouble to dispose of clothes, shoes, etc., in such a manner.

THe bottom lines is I don't think the cage we are looking for has been found yet.
Bladerunner...what you say makes sense, but I can't stop thinking the knife/machete rope, etc and maybe other evidence (tennis shoe(s) any other evidence) may have been hastily disposed of in the trap and taken out that night. Natalee may have also been buried near the fish hut and later moved (landfill, water, incinerated??). I guess in this order: they buried Natalee first, then realized they needed to dispose of evidence-thats where the trap comes into play. They probably wouldn't think to take it too far out that night, thus the 90 ft depth. JMO


I'm liking it. But have to wonder why such a large trap for such a few items. Why not bury them, too? Just playing the devil's advocate here, Billb, anything is possible in this case.
Burying evidence is also plausible, but I think they were in panic mode when "something bad happened" They buried Natalee in haste, then thought of evidence. The trap was there (and a fishing boat), maybe called for help (koen, K2, SC??) to handle trap. I have heard alot about possible Koen and his boat used for disposal, and that may have been the case. But if Koen's boat was too small, they more than likely use the fishing boat moored, since it was probably better suited to handle the trap. They used the boat to move the trap, then placed it back at its mooring. The purpose of using the trap for the evidence is to distance the evidence from the body. Could have been Paulus idea to do that initially, with Paulus then planning to move her body later, with or without letting the others know of his plan.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Buckeye on March 06, 2008, 11:20:52 PM
Bladerunner

If they only his Natalee the first night....maybe in bushes with thorns or branches (causing scratches on Guido and Joran...or Joran's sore legs), they could have come back Monday evening...the night he purposely wanted to be seen on the casino camera...

Ok, I'm forgetting the timeline here, when is the cage supposed to have been stolen and when was it reported stolen?

I don't think we have an exact day....and Renfro would tell you that since there was no police report (because she knows everything) that there is no missing cage.  Guess the fishermen know when reporting thefts just isn't worth the phone call.    ::MonkeyConfused::::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 06, 2008, 11:21:28 PM
"Justice in Aruba wants nothing more than say that there are still investigation into what happened on the night that Holloway disappeared."



Yeah, sure, for nearly 3 friggin years!!!




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 06, 2008, 11:21:52 PM

Robin wanted me to see them and analyze them.  LOL  Jackb


 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Buckeye on March 06, 2008, 11:22:57 PM
If it happened Sunday night, the fishermen were there and would have seen them.....must have been the next night...or after fishermen went home.
So Monday night would have been when Beth arrived and saw Joran and Deepak and they were not dressed like they had been to the casino...right?

 :smt045 :smt045 :smt045


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Kiwi on March 06, 2008, 11:23:43 PM
Another link could be reason for the ATM nite trip for a few hundred dollars. To pay to borrow the boat from the fisherman. Possibly not knowing why until after its use, which would keep them quiet. Just speculation only. Hopefully they were not involved at all.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: billb's daughter on March 06, 2008, 11:24:05 PM
The trap still intrigues me. It is possible that the one found could have been the one that was stolen, but based on what we know thus far, it likely did not contain remains related to this case. However, I think its possible it COULD have contained other items of evidence.

Then again, if that is true, one has to ask the question why go through so much trouble to dispose of clothes, shoes, etc., in such a manner.

THe bottom lines is I don't think the cage we are looking for has been found yet.
Bladerunner...what you say makes sense, but I can't stop thinking the knife/machete rope, etc and maybe other evidence (tennis shoe(s) any other evidence) may have been hastily disposed of in the trap and taken out that night. Natalee may have also been buried near the fish hut and later moved (landfill, water, incinerated??). I guess in this order: they buried Natalee first, then realized they needed to dispose of evidence-thats where the trap comes into play. They probably wouldn't think to take it too far out that night, thus the 90 ft depth. JMO

That scenario could very well have happened. If your pressed for time you might not think to go out too far either. Are you thinking that a fisherman's boat was involved or a "freinds boat?"
I would suspect fishermen boat already moored near the huts, as it would probably be better suited to handle the trap...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 06, 2008, 11:25:20 PM
If it happened Sunday night, the fishermen were there and would have seen them.....must have been the next night...or after fishermen went home.
So Monday night would have been when Beth arrived and saw Joran and Deepak and they were not dressed like they had been to the casino...right?

So the "kiddies" get the easy assignment, all they have to do is put the evidence in the trap and take it out to sea on Monday night while the adults were busy with the business end of things, trying to figure out what to do with the dead body of Natalee Holloway.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Buckeye on March 06, 2008, 11:26:22 PM



If who ever Joran called could have broke into the hut looking for the key to the fishing boat parked by the hut. If they returned it back to its mooring it would appear that it was never moved. Plus no need to find a boat that could hold the trap.
[/quote]

 :smt045 :smt045 :smt045


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 06, 2008, 11:26:30 PM

Burying evidence is also plausible, but I think they were in panic mode when "something bad happened" They buried Natalee in haste, then thought of evidence. The trap was there (and a fishing boat), maybe called for help (koen, K2, SC??) to handle trap. I have heard alot about possible Koen and his boat used for disposal, and that may have been the case. But if Koen's boat was too small, they more than likely use the fishing boat moored, since it was probably better suited to handle the trap. They used the boat to move the trap, then placed it back at its mooring. The purpose of using the trap for the evidence is to distance the evidence from the body. Could have been Paulus idea to do that initially, with Paulus then planning to move her body later, with or without letting the others know of his plan.


I'm thinking Steve Croes. In fact he could have used that party boat to drag the trap out that short a distance if his little boat couldn't.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Observer on March 06, 2008, 11:27:51 PM
Soooooooooo what name did Patrick give as the person who helped dump Natalee into the ocean? We know it wasn't Daury! I think it's a name we all know and thats why they didn't air tonights program!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: billb's daughter on March 06, 2008, 11:27:53 PM
Hi all- Here is something that may be important. Did Ale actually check the fishermans boat to see if any of Natalee's DNA could be found or blood. Its possible the boat that could transport a trap was sitting there all along. Next question did they keep the keys in the hut?


That begs the question, did ALE check anything? There are lots of boats not far away at the moorings in front of the hotels and rumor has it Koen Gottenbos had his boat parked there. There are very few put-in points where he lives on the north end of the island.

ALE and Karin Jannsen refused to interview him causing Asst. Prosecutor Amylin Flanigan to quit the investigation.

Just maybe, Koen's boat was used to transport Natalee/evidence from painted rocks area to fishing hut? Then fishing hut/trap/fishermen boat comes into play??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 06, 2008, 11:28:08 PM
If it happened Sunday night, the fishermen were there and would have seen them.....must have been the next night...or after fishermen went home.
So Monday night would have been when Beth arrived and saw Joran and Deepak and they were not dressed like they had been to the casino...right?

So the "kiddies" get the easy assignment, all they have to do is put the evidence in the trap and take it out to sea on Monday night while the adults were busy with the business end of things, trying to figure out what to do with the dead body of Natalee Holloway.


I like it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Buckeye on March 06, 2008, 11:28:58 PM
If it happened Sunday night, the fishermen were there and would have seen them.....must have been the next night...or after fishermen went home.
So Monday night would have been when Beth arrived and saw Joran and Deepak and they were not dressed like they had been to the casino...right?

So the "kiddies" get the easy assignment, all they have to do is put the evidence in the trap and take it out to sea on Monday night while the adults were busy with the business end of things, trying to figure out what to do with the dead body of Natalee Holloway.

The kiddies and adults put Natalee in the cage with the other evidence, Monday night or early morning, when fishermen left.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 06, 2008, 11:30:03 PM

Burying evidence is also plausible, but I think they were in panic mode when "something bad happened" They buried Natalee in haste, then thought of evidence. The trap was there (and a fishing boat), maybe called for help (koen, K2, SC??) to handle trap. I have heard alot about possible Koen and his boat used for disposal, and that may have been the case. But if Koen's boat was too small, they more than likely use the fishing boat moored, since it was probably better suited to handle the trap. They used the boat to move the trap, then placed it back at its mooring. The purpose of using the trap for the evidence is to distance the evidence from the body. Could have been Paulus idea to do that initially, with Paulus then planning to move her body later, with or without letting the others know of his plan.


I'm thinking Steve Croes. In fact he could have used that party boat to drag the trap out that short a distance if his little boat couldn't.

How does the duffle bag fit into this timeline with the cage?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 06, 2008, 11:30:45 PM
Hi all- Here is something that may be important. Did Ale actually check the fishermans boat to see if any of Natalee's DNA could be found or blood. Its possible the boat that could transport a trap was sitting there all along. Next question did they keep the keys in the hut?


That begs the question, did ALE check anything? There are lots of boats not far away at the moorings in front of the hotels and rumor has it Koen Gottenbos had his boat parked there. There are very few put-in points where he lives on the north end of the island.

ALE and Karin Jannsen refused to interview him causing Asst. Prosecutor Amylin Flanigan to quit the investigation.

Just maybe, Koen's boat was used to transport Natalee/evidence from painted rocks area to fishing hut? Then fishing hut/trap/fishermen boat comes into play??



I like it. I think Steve Croes would be more adept and knowledgeable than Koen but would not rule either of them out. Just moving a trap may be no great shakes for either.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: hotping on March 06, 2008, 11:31:10 PM
If it happened Sunday night, the fishermen were there and would have seen them.....must have been the next night...or after fishermen went home.
So Monday night would have been when Beth arrived and saw Joran and Deepak and they were not dressed like they had been to the casino...right?

So the "kiddies" get the easy assignment, all they have to do is put the evidence in the trap and take it out to sea on Monday night while the adults were busy with the business end of things, trying to figure out what to do with the dead body of Natalee Holloway.
My thinking is that Natalee was probably at the Vandersloot House when Beth and Jug arrived there on Monday Night...I don't know if I believe Natalee was still alive or not but I believe She was on the property that night....Paulus refused to let them inside the gates or in the house so that tells Me that he had something to hide if not why not gladly let them look. JMO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Buckeye on March 06, 2008, 11:31:38 PM
Soooooooooo what name did Patrick give as the person who helped dump Natalee into the ocean? We know it wasn't Daury!

Didn't Mos say the name was not Daury?? and didn't Peter R. say something about that not being the name Joran said?  I'm thinking everybody knows the name, but us...and it is a "power" person...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 06, 2008, 11:31:39 PM

Burying evidence is also plausible, but I think they were in panic mode when "something bad happened" They buried Natalee in haste, then thought of evidence. The trap was there (and a fishing boat), maybe called for help (koen, K2, SC??) to handle trap. I have heard alot about possible Koen and his boat used for disposal, and that may have been the case. But if Koen's boat was too small, they more than likely use the fishing boat moored, since it was probably better suited to handle the trap. They used the boat to move the trap, then placed it back at its mooring. The purpose of using the trap for the evidence is to distance the evidence from the body. Could have been Paulus idea to do that initially, with Paulus then planning to move her body later, with or without letting the others know of his plan.


I'm thinking Steve Croes. In fact he could have used that party boat to drag the trap out that short a distance if his little boat couldn't.

How does the duffle bag fit into this timeline with the cage?


It definitely pushes it back a day.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: billb's daughter on March 06, 2008, 11:34:08 PM
Another link could be reason for the ATM nite trip for a few hundred dollars. To pay to borrow the boat from the fisherman. Possibly not knowing why until after its use, which would keep them quiet. Just speculation only. Hopefully they were not involved at all.
Probably ATM cash was used to try and replace used fuel, so the fishermen would not become suspicious seeing low fuel? 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Observer on March 06, 2008, 11:34:10 PM
Soooooooooo what name did Patrick give as the person who helped dump Natalee into the ocean? We know it wasn't Daury!

Didn't Mos say the name was not Daury?? and didn't Peter R. say something about that not being the name Joran said?  I'm thinking everybody knows the name, but us...and it is a "power" person...

Patrick said the name on that recording for Aruban TV and it is not Daury! No wonder why they cancelled the show so they can protect him..Eh Um I mean investigate him!  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 06, 2008, 11:34:24 PM
If it happened Sunday night, the fishermen were there and would have seen them.....must have been the next night...or after fishermen went home.
So Monday night would have been when Beth arrived and saw Joran and Deepak and they were not dressed like they had been to the casino...right?

So the "kiddies" get the easy assignment, all they have to do is put the evidence in the trap and take it out to sea on Monday night while the adults were busy with the business end of things, trying to figure out what to do with the dead body of Natalee Holloway.

The kiddies and adults put Natalee in the cage with the other evidence, Monday night or early morning, when fishermen left.

If one was really cover all bases then the collateral evidence would NOT be disposed of with the body. I would assume Paulus would not take that chance. However, since Joran is so unflinching in his comfort that "they will never find her" then an all-in disposal of the body and evidence might have occured.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Buckeye on March 06, 2008, 11:36:23 PM
If it happened Sunday night, the fishermen were there and would have seen them.....must have been the next night...or after fishermen went home.
So Monday night would have been when Beth arrived and saw Joran and Deepak and they were not dressed like they had been to the casino...right?

So the "kiddies" get the easy assignment, all they have to do is put the evidence in the trap and take it out to sea on Monday night while the adults were busy with the business end of things, trying to figure out what to do with the dead body of Natalee Holloway.
My thinking is that Natalee was probably at the Vandersloot House when Beth and Jug arrived there on Monday Night...I don't know if I believe Natalee was still alive or not but I believe She was on the property that night....Paulus refused to let them inside the gates or in the house so that tells Me that he had something to hide if not why not gladly let them look. JMO

or she was there when Alberto jumped the gate and got the license plate and then they left with her. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 06, 2008, 11:37:49 PM
Soooooooooo what name did Patrick give as the person who helped dump Natalee into the ocean? We know it wasn't Daury! I think it's a name we all know and thats why they didn't air tonights program!


Another fire drill to make sure all us Monkeys were awake.  ::MonkeyHaHa:: If I had to guess they are trying to factor Paulus into it. Joran's lingo on the Patrick tapes is a dead giveaway.   


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 06, 2008, 11:39:21 PM
Soooooooooo what name did Patrick give as the person who helped dump Natalee into the ocean? We know it wasn't Daury!

Didn't Mos say the name was not Daury?? and didn't Peter R. say something about that not being the name Joran said?  I'm thinking everybody knows the name, but us...and it is a "power" person...

Patrick said the name on that recording for Aruban TV and it is not Daury! No wonder why they cancelled the show so they can protect him..Eh Um I mean investigate him!  ::MonkeyWink::

Well, if all of this is true then that name WILL come out sooner or later. But you're right, why let the facts out now, that would be totally off-script for these A-holes.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 06, 2008, 11:39:35 PM
Another link could be reason for the ATM nite trip for a few hundred dollars. To pay to borrow the boat from the fisherman. Possibly not knowing why until after its use, which would keep them quiet. Just speculation only. Hopefully they were not involved at all.


That also suggests Steve Croes being the boatman. They wouldn't be paying Koan, he would do it out of kinship.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 06, 2008, 11:41:19 PM

Well, if all of this is true then that name WILL come out sooner or later. But you're right, why let the facts out now, that would be totally off-script for these A-holes.


Investigate or protect? You never know on Aruba.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Kiwi on March 06, 2008, 11:42:13 PM
Another link could be reason for the ATM nite trip for a few hundred dollars. To pay to borrow the boat from the fisherman. Possibly not knowing why until after its use, which would keep them quiet. Just speculation only. Hopefully they were not involved at all.
Probably ATM cash was used to try and replace used fuel, so the fishermen would not become suspicious seeing low fuel? 
That sounds better. Less loose ends. I would suspect the gym bag was used to remove anything loose in the area, such as shoes and clothing.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 06, 2008, 11:43:01 PM

If one was really cover all bases then the collateral evidence would NOT be disposed of with the body. I would assume Paulus would not take that chance. However, since Joran is so unflinching in his comfort that "they will never find her" then an all-in disposal of the body and evidence might have occured.


So comforted in his own words he went home and slept like a baby.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Buckeye on March 06, 2008, 11:43:31 PM
Another link could be reason for the ATM nite trip for a few hundred dollars. To pay to borrow the boat from the fisherman. Possibly not knowing why until after its use, which would keep them quiet. Just speculation only. Hopefully they were not involved at all.


That also suggests Steve Croes being the boatman. They wouldn't be paying Koan, he would do it out of kinship.

Maybe the boat didn't have gas and they needed cash to get some.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: billb's daughter on March 06, 2008, 11:45:01 PM

Burying evidence is also plausible, but I think they were in panic mode when "something bad happened" They buried Natalee in haste, then thought of evidence. The trap was there (and a fishing boat), maybe called for help (koen, K2, SC??) to handle trap. I have heard alot about possible Koen and his boat used for disposal, and that may have been the case. But if Koen's boat was too small, they more than likely use the fishing boat moored, since it was probably better suited to handle the trap. They used the boat to move the trap, then placed it back at its mooring. The purpose of using the trap for the evidence is to distance the evidence from the body. Could have been Paulus idea to do that initially, with Paulus then planning to move her body later, with or without letting the others know of his plan.


I'm thinking Steve Croes. In fact he could have used that party boat to drag the trap out that short a distance if his little boat couldn't.

How does the duffle bag fit into this timeline with the cage?


It definitely pushes it back a day.
True, but what if the trap was put out to sea in 90' depth the first night? Then the duffel bag contains evidence (Bloody shoes/clothes of perps, Natalee's clothes, etc) discovered by Paulus at the VDslootbag home. A scuba diver could easily take the bag/contents out and place in trap. JVDS younger brother is a scuba diver (I think I read this).....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Buckeye on March 06, 2008, 11:47:32 PM
Soooooooooo what name did Patrick give as the person who helped dump Natalee into the ocean? We know it wasn't Daury! I think it's a name we all know and thats why they didn't air tonights program!


Another fire drill to make sure all us Monkeys were awake.  ::MonkeyHaHa:: If I had to guess they are trying to factor Paulus into it. Joran's lingo on the Patrick tapes is a dead giveaway.   


Maybe the plan was to dub in "Pitbull" and even Mos said, "not again....Julia will need another letter"...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 06, 2008, 11:49:17 PM

Burying evidence is also plausible, but I think they were in panic mode when "something bad happened" They buried Natalee in haste, then thought of evidence. The trap was there (and a fishing boat), maybe called for help (koen, K2, SC??) to handle trap. I have heard alot about possible Koen and his boat used for disposal, and that may have been the case. But if Koen's boat was too small, they more than likely use the fishing boat moored, since it was probably better suited to handle the trap. They used the boat to move the trap, then placed it back at its mooring. The purpose of using the trap for the evidence is to distance the evidence from the body. Could have been Paulus idea to do that initially, with Paulus then planning to move her body later, with or without letting the others know of his plan.


I'm thinking Steve Croes. In fact he could have used that party boat to drag the trap out that short a distance if his little boat couldn't.

How does the duffle bag fit into this timeline with the cage?


It definitely pushes it back a day.
True, but what if the trap was put out to sea in 90' depth the first night? Then the duffel bag contains evidence (Bloody shoes/clothes of perps, Natalee's clothes, etc) discovered by Paulus at the VDslootbag home. A scuba diver could easily take the bag/contents out and place in trap. JVDS younger brother is a scuba diver (I think I read this).....

Perhaps, THAT, set of evidence made its way to the incinerator. Either way I can't wait for the rover to go back into that water.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Buckeye on March 06, 2008, 11:50:54 PM
I bet, if we hold our breath, for the next 24 hours, all will be revealed.   ::MonkeyRoll::


Hmmm...do you think that's how 24ora got it's name???


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Observer on March 06, 2008, 11:51:43 PM
Breaking News!

March 6th Diario

The Police in Aruba led by Dennis Jacobs will not budge on there demands,they will not stop protesting until they get more Frosted Flakes and Donut's in their contract! They are also angry about the recent drug busts of the dealers as it is hurting there income from kickbacks! They are asking for the tourists to leave the islands crackhouses and whores alone! You are safe as long as you do not have a ATM card! ::MonkeyWink::

(http://i198.photobucket.com/albums/aa118/Observer00000007/donuts.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: klaasend on March 06, 2008, 11:58:20 PM
OMG is that Jacobs?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Observer on March 07, 2008, 12:00:13 AM
OMG is that Jacobs?
Of course it is!  ::MonkeyTongue::  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: hotping on March 07, 2008, 12:01:09 AM
Breaking News!

March 6th Diario

The Police in Aruba led by Dennis Jacobs will not budge on there demands,they will not stop protesting until they get more Frosted Flakes and Donut's in their contract! They are also angry about the recent drug busts of the dealers as it is hurting there income from kickbacks! They are asking for the tourists to leave the islands crackhouses and whores alone! You are safe as long as you do not have a ATM card! ::MonkeyWink::

(http://i198.photobucket.com/albums/aa118/Observer00000007/donuts.jpg)
Thank You *******...I really really needed a good laugh!  ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 07, 2008, 12:01:11 AM
 ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: hotping on March 07, 2008, 12:03:10 AM
I bet, if we hold our breath, for the next 24 hours, all will be revealed.   ::MonkeyRoll::


Hmmm...do you think that's how 24ora got it's name???
::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 07, 2008, 12:05:35 AM
I bet, if we hold our breath, for the next 24 hours, all will be revealed.   ::MonkeyRoll::


Hmmm...do you think that's how 24ora got it's name???
::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::

How many more swings of that hour pendulum until the S**T hits the fan??

 ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Kiwi on March 07, 2008, 12:06:03 AM
gota go to nite, thanks for knocking that idea around. Hopefully thats been long ago ruled out by Ale. Then again maybe Klassend can pass that along to the family to find out. Breaking in to hut for keys to the moored fishing boat to move the trap and just return the key back to the hut. Nite all!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: klaasend on March 07, 2008, 12:09:51 AM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/alestrike.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: wreck on March 07, 2008, 12:10:15 AM
Breaking News!

March 6th Diario

The Police in Aruba led by Dennis Jacobs will not budge on there demands,they will not stop protesting until they get more Frosted Flakes and Donut's in their contract! They are also angry about the recent drug busts of the dealers as it is hurting there income from kickbacks! They are asking for the tourists to leave the islands crackhouses and whores alone! You are safe as long as you do not have a ATM card! ::MonkeyWink::

(http://i198.photobucket.com/albums/aa118/Observer00000007/donuts.jpg)
Why do I get the feeling all them have the same first name ....... "Barney"????


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: LoRain on March 07, 2008, 12:11:25 AM



I have had a thought.....concerning the size of the trap....size of boat...the rope....WHAT IF they knew it wouldn't fit into a buddy's boat....and knew it would fit into the fisherman's boat.....so they took the rope and pulled the fisherman's boat with the trap in it using the buddy's boat and walaa...out to sea they go.....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Observer on March 07, 2008, 12:13:52 AM
 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyHaHa::  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: LoRain on March 07, 2008, 12:17:09 AM



So....a good thought or just surprize that I had one....lol....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: hotping on March 07, 2008, 12:22:04 AM



I have had a thought.....concerning the size of the trap....size of boat...the rope....WHAT IF they knew it wouldn't fit into a buddy's boat....and knew it would fit into the fisherman's boat.....so they took the rope and pulled the fisherman's boat with the trap in it using the buddy's boat and walaa...out to sea they go.....
Makes Sense to Me....It is quite possible..... ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Observer on March 07, 2008, 12:25:20 AM



I have had a thought.....concerning the size of the trap....size of boat...the rope....WHAT IF they knew it wouldn't fit into a buddy's boat....and knew it would fit into the fisherman's boat.....so they took the rope and pulled the fisherman's boat with the trap in it using the buddy's boat and walaa...out to sea they go.....
I think the trap found and the one stolen as being a big handfull for Koens boat unless they pulled it. With reinforced iron/steel it does not look like it would fold and would weigh quite a bit,it would also snag easily to the ocean bottom. Taking the Fishermans boat is a possibility as others here will agree with you.

My theory is she was buried temporarily and possibly moved like dompig said and then out to sea. At this point anything is possible  ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: wreck on March 07, 2008, 12:27:31 AM



I have had a thought.....concerning the size of the trap....size of boat...the rope....WHAT IF they knew it wouldn't fit into a buddy's boat....and knew it would fit into the fisherman's boat.....so they took the rope and pulled the fisherman's boat with the trap in it using the buddy's boat and walaa...out to sea they go.....
Makes Sense to Me....It is quite possible..... ::MonkeyWink::
Possible, but it seems a little too "clever" for these punks. It would explain however, why the fishermen would not be raising holy hell that their boat had a lot of fuel missing.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: wreck on March 07, 2008, 12:31:30 AM



I have had a thought.....concerning the size of the trap....size of boat...the rope....WHAT IF they knew it wouldn't fit into a buddy's boat....and knew it would fit into the fisherman's boat.....so they took the rope and pulled the fisherman's boat with the trap in it using the buddy's boat and walaa...out to sea they go.....
I think the trap found and the one stolen as being a big handfull for Koens boat unless they pulled it. With reinforced iron/steel it does not look like it would fold and would weigh quite a bit,it would also snag easily to the ocean bottom. Taking the Fishermans boat is a possibility as others here will agree with you.

My theory is she was buried temporarily and possibly moved like dompig said and then out to sea. At this point anything is possible  ::MonkeyConfused::
Yes, I still think she was buried first and then disposed of at sea later -- possibly Monday, maybe even later. I still contend that Joran was leading them to where HE thought she was buried on June 10th. I don't think Daury Daddy actually told Joran what he did with her.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Observer on March 07, 2008, 12:33:42 AM
Solo Di Pueblo March 6th 2008(Run through Papi and Portuguese translator)

advocate of patrick van der eem owing to prohibit poentje castro of forward grabacion scondi imagesta.

Sun of people owing to comprende cu the situation is currently tense for her declaration of policy one day in life because, also his producer poentje castro and tele aruba. Advocate of patrick van der eem owing to write one letter for poentje castro where the place is responsible because, also tele aruba over at bay if they pass one video cu owing to wordo graba scondi of patrick. Was diadomingo week cu happen in the declaration of policy one day in life, the producer poentje castro owing to happen 7 minuut of one grabacion scondi cu el'a haci of patrick van der eem.

In the grabacion scondi here, patrick van der eem owing to tell cu el'a give joran van der sloot 2000 euro for send for his accomplice, it is he cu yude owing to dump the body of natalee in mud. Patrick according van der eem, if cu police at bay such company at the netherlands, they will know exactly achieve that is for the coin owing to wordo transfer. The complice here, which joran owing to give fictional name of "daury," apparently is bibando at rotterdam. Also patrick van der eem owing to lie cu el'a ricibi only 25 thousand euro for her trabao, but genuinely el'a ricibi 1 miyon euro for the haci for trabao of de vries. The grabacion here not owing to happen in his totality, already cu castro owing to tell the cu wanted sell the grabacion here cu cu market and the netherlands.

Of another near sun of people owing to comprende cu joran van der sloot owing to cuminza one case against patrick van der eem for owing to haci grabacion intentional and scondi of his person without his autorizacion. Motibo for her here, looking cu patrick have one case against dje now at the netherlands, el'a using self strategia one of joran against poentje castro. Poentje castro owing to priminti his televidentenan cu today, diahuebs the bay will air the declaration of policy here. Kico will happen today? Poentje and telearuba will bay door cu the transmision of the grabacion scondi? Or will prefera for avoids problem? Come across


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on March 07, 2008, 12:43:04 AM
Klaas if anyone would know it would be you

Is there any official document or an article that says police have found a single one of jorans shoes with blood/mud and if so when?

plz humour me i know this has been discussed and i have done some research but i cant find anything but rumours

The most credible report you will see is from Beth what she wrote in her Diary. Unfortunately much of the older News Videos are no longer available on the net when they were looking for one Shoe,as that would also be a good source of Info. Recently Fox made youtube take down all the older vids that were on youtube for copyright infringement so we don't even have those anymore. Greta also edited out a good portion of what was important on her website and at Fox News as well.  I seriously doubt there is a single document on the net that states they found one shoe with blood or mud on it. So much of what you will find is hearsay or what was told to Beth.

I'm thinking this is way out there but I want to put it out anyway.

Do you think the reason they keep asking about a brand new pair of KSwiss is because ALE found a receipt for them while 'investigating' but no one could come up with the shoes so ALE was trying to find them hoping it would lead to evidence?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: wreck on March 07, 2008, 12:49:23 AM
Klaas if anyone would know it would be you

Is there any official document or an article that says police have found a single one of jorans shoes with blood/mud and if so when?

plz humour me i know this has been discussed and i have done some research but i cant find anything but rumours

The most credible report you will see is from Beth what she wrote in her Diary. Unfortunately much of the older News Videos are no longer available on the net when they were looking for one Shoe,as that would also be a good source of Info. Recently Fox made youtube take down all the older vids that were on youtube for copyright infringement so we don't even have those anymore. Greta also edited out a good portion of what was important on her website and at Fox News as well.  I seriously doubt there is a single document on the net that states they found one shoe with blood or mud on it. So much of what you will find is hearsay or what was told to Beth.

I'm thinking this is way out there but I want to put it out anyway.

Do you think the reason they keep asking about a brand new pair of KSwiss is because ALE found a receipt for them while 'investigating' but no one could come up with the shoes so ALE was trying to find them hoping it would lead to evidence?
I think you are giving the ALE too much credit. I think there were 2-3 "honest" ALE and the actual evidence found had to be "lost" or "discredited" by the crooked ones.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on March 07, 2008, 12:50:34 AM
More on the missing shoe (s):

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8798488/

SCARBOROUGH:  Explain to us about Joran van der Sloot‘s shoes and how that actually is now a part of this investigation. 

KOSINSKI:  Police have been pretty tightlipped about this.  There have been rumors about them looking for a shoe in various places.  Today, we know from police they‘re actually looking for a pair of sneakers, K-Swiss blue and white striped sneaker.  We even know the size, size 14.  So, they put out some detail there. 

We know that, when they drained that field and pond, we‘d been told that they were looking for something like that, some evidence.  They won‘t go so far as to tell us that they think these were lost on the night Natalee disappeared.  But obviously they see them as having some potential evidentiary value because they‘ve been looking for them, they tell us, along beaches, other locations on this island.  And they want those sneakers found.



...or maybe they found an empty shoe box.  How would you actually know that something is missing unless there is some proof that it actually existed in the first place?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Observer on March 07, 2008, 12:53:24 AM
Dan young y kelly castillo are of person y mediumnan have to owing to have to stop! have much Black Magic in the case of natalee holloway and beth holloway also is matter here.

Solo Di Pueblo March 6th 2008

(http://img98.imageshack.us/img98/1974/youngcastillogm8.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: texasmom on March 07, 2008, 01:02:06 AM


Goodnight everyone!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: jackb on March 07, 2008, 01:02:48 AM
Klaas if anyone would know it would be you

Is there any official document or an article that says police have found a single one of jorans shoes with blood/mud and if so when?

plz humour me i know this has been discussed and i have done some research but i cant find anything but rumours


I don't think there is anything official, at least not that I've seen.  The only thing I remember is postings in forums and blogs.  They did officially SEARCH for one or two shoes, they even had a "missing shoes" poster.  I'll try and find that.

There was talk about police findig one in jorans closet but i cant find anything about it. I read the rumours and the hearsay etc i am trying to put a timeline on these shoes and need some details. any help appreciated thx
Hi! I'm sorry I can't link you to the transcript or video but I KNOW I heard this on TV and it was a quote from DOMPIG.  I heard it on either N Grace, Greta or Rita Cosby's show.  Any of you guys remember it?
  I remember it and they, as well took a baseball bat out of the house as well we never heard any more about.  The shoe was mentioned around the same time.      Jackb


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: hotping on March 07, 2008, 01:04:28 AM
Good Night TM and Thank You! Check Your Email When You Can!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: jackb on March 07, 2008, 01:07:51 AM
Klaas if anyone would know it would be you

Is there any official document or an article that says police have found a single one of jorans shoes with blood/mud and if so when?

plz humour me i know this has been discussed and i have done some research but i cant find anything but rumours


I don't think there is anything official, at least not that I've seen.  The only thing I remember is postings in forums and blogs.  They did officially SEARCH for one or two shoes, they even had a "missing shoes" poster.  I'll try and find that.

There was talk about police findig one in jorans closet but i cant find anything about it. I read the rumours and the hearsay etc i am trying to put a timeline on these shoes and need some details. any help appreciated thx
Hi! I'm sorry I can't link you to the transcript or video but I KNOW I heard this on TV and it was a quote from DOMPIG.  I heard it on either N Grace, Greta or Rita Cosby's show.  Any of you guys remember it?
  I remember it and they, as well took a baseball bat out of the house as well we never heard any more about.  The shoe was mentioned around the same time.      Jackb
  Also it is mentioned in Beth's journal as quoted in RWV around March 3.......jackb


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Observer on March 07, 2008, 01:09:22 AM
Two very long articles accusing the AVP of Fraud,Extortion/Assortment of crimes and being a Mafia Organization..But I won't bore you with that..Time for a quick advertisement by Subway  ::MonkeyEek::

(http://img443.imageshack.us/img443/6031/michaelzr4.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: klaasend on March 07, 2008, 01:10:49 AM
Michael Dompig makes the big time, lol  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: jackb on March 07, 2008, 01:13:10 AM
Good Night TM and Thank You! Check Your Email When You Can!
  this below came from RWV:

whats the story with Vandersloots shoes? Did they actually find them on the beach.

Posted by: bamakell | Thursday, March 02, 2006 at 11:34 PM

He says he left them on the beach. However, Beth Twitty's so-called journal says one sneaker had blood in it. Really? I'll believe Joran.

Posted by: sensible | Thursday, March 02, 2006 at 11:42 PM
As quoted from RWV.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: hotping on March 07, 2008, 01:13:29 AM
Michael Dompig makes the big time, lol  ::MonkeyHaHa::
Well You Gotta Admit He's Better Looking than Joraaan!  ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Observer on March 07, 2008, 01:15:07 AM
Michael Dompig makes the big time, lol  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Yup..He beat out his Buddy Kawish..Who's model pose looked like this  ::MonkeyEek::

That Ad only runs in Solo Di Pueblo so far that I have seen..Obviously a MEP controlled paper as they are blasting the hell out of the AVP this week..Not one article but two accusing them of being the Mafia yesterday..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: hotping on March 07, 2008, 01:19:14 AM
Michael Dompig makes the big time, lol  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Yup..He beat out his Buddy Kawish..Who's model pose looked like this  ::MonkeyEek::

That Ad only runs in Solo Di Pueblo so far that I have seen..Obviously a MEP controlled paper as they are blasting the hell out of the AVP this week..Not one article but two accusing them of being the Mafia yesterday..
::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Anna on March 07, 2008, 01:22:31 AM
Trying to read all the way back and get caught up.

Patrick has already said he thinks Daury = Daddy so I don't think the program was cancelled because he said that again but do think it might be Paulus as the one threatening to sue.

Also Mos might have warned that program host that he could also be sued for airing the statements of the psycho psychics which is what I was fearful was his intent for this cancelled program.  Was dreading that all day.

Now it's all "poof" but I think that is the reason the psycho psychic stuff and this host is trying to blame it on Patrick some way or other.

jmo


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: hotping on March 07, 2008, 01:26:38 AM
More on the missing shoe (s):

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8798488/

SCARBOROUGH:  Explain to us about Joran van der Sloot‘s shoes and how that actually is now a part of this investigation. 

KOSINSKI:  Police have been pretty tightlipped about this.  There have been rumors about them looking for a shoe in various places.  Today, we know from police they‘re actually looking for a pair of sneakers, K-Swiss blue and white striped sneaker.  We even know the size, size 14.  So, they put out some detail there. 

We know that, when they drained that field and pond, we‘d been told that they were looking for something like that, some evidence.  They won‘t go so far as to tell us that they think these were lost on the night Natalee disappeared.  But obviously they see them as having some potential evidentiary value because they‘ve been looking for them, they tell us, along beaches, other locations on this island.  And they want those sneakers found.



...or maybe they found an empty shoe box.  How would you actually know that something is missing unless there is some proof that it actually existed in the first place?
Hi BH...I've been wondering about those shoes also....in the car tapes with Patrick....Just why would Joran have even mentioned that He threw them in the ditch or whatever....I think that He is very worried about the shoes because He doesn't know what happened to them and He's trying to distance himself from them just like when He mentions that the person that helped Him dispose of Natalee wasn't his parents...I mean why even bring them up...that is the shoes and his parents...makes you go HMMMMM  ::MonkeyWink:: ::MonkeyConfused:: 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: jackb on March 07, 2008, 01:29:20 AM
Two very long articles accusing the AVP of Fraud,Extortion/Assortment of crimes and being a Mafia Organization..But I won't bore you with that..Time for a quick advertisement by Subway  ::MonkeyEek::

(http://img443.imageshack.us/img443/6031/michaelzr4.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)



  That appears to be Michael Dompeeg modeling for Subway.  Jackb


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Observer on March 07, 2008, 01:33:08 AM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/alestrike.jpg)

I sure hope they give in to his demands..He may start shaking people down even the Dutch Tourists..How Much guilders do you have?  ::MonkeyEek:: ::MonkeyShocked::  ::MonkeyWaa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on March 07, 2008, 01:37:40 AM
Another link could be reason for the ATM nite trip for a few hundred dollars. To pay to borrow the boat from the fisherman. Possibly not knowing why until after its use, which would keep them quiet. Just speculation only. Hopefully they were not involved at all.
Probably ATM cash was used to try and replace used fuel, so the fishermen would not become suspicious seeing low fuel? 

I once mentioned the ATM money going to buy fuel.  Let's just say it wasn't received well.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: jackb on March 07, 2008, 01:39:02 AM

The size of the cage leads one to believe that the cage--and whatever might have been inside--most likely went into the sea that night, since transporting it around the island would have be ackward and risky.

If it didn't go into the sea that night that would mean they would have had to have secured a vehicle capable of transporting it and a place to hide it out of view.

If they did stash it first somehwere--xtc house maybe--then they would also have had to of transported it once again in order to bring it to a boat. And at that time it would be full of "evidence." This double move scenario seems highly unlikely and since we know the trap has not turned up, it has to be in the ocean. If it is within the search grid, we know the rover will find it.




Agree with you here wholeheartedly, no way they are toting a trap like that around the island. Steve Croes would have a lot of knowledge about the huts, traps, and how to move them and if ALE haven't disappeared it there is supposed to be a call to him from a Van der Sloot phone around 6:30 am that morning. That would be the call that Paulus told Greta he can't remember whether he made or not.

I find it amazing that Paulus' memories fail him so much on what happens to the the most monumentally significant day of he and his son's lives.


Risky?  It was most likely the ALE and/or Beach Patrol who would have transported it.  Who is going to stop the PO LICE?   jackb


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Anna on March 07, 2008, 01:43:59 AM
More on the shoes--it never ends.

Note I believe it was Tromp saying the shoes were new which Joran also said and that he, Joran, wanted them back because of this.

Then later he was reported saying on Aruban Radio I think Chanel 90 that they were old so he didn't mind that they were lost, just forget about shoes, etc.

The SHOES are in the Twilight Zone as well!  The things that will make you go crazy if you think about them too long.

 ::MonkeyConfused::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: jackb on March 07, 2008, 01:44:32 AM
Michael Dompig makes the big time, lol  ::MonkeyHaHa::

I hope he has more than the one "face pose."  They are bout to wear that one out. Surely they taught him more than the one.  It is beginning to look silly.    j/b


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on March 07, 2008, 01:46:05 AM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/alestrike.jpg)

                        ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::

I'll tell you what, those Frosted Flake must be fortified with extra carb!

                         ::MonkeyShocked:: ::MonkeyShocked::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Anna on March 07, 2008, 01:50:25 AM
Aruba might want to consider height/weight requirement for LE the way most countries have but looks a though that might entail replacing the entire force.

Perhaps Jacobs might consider a diet of those low fat subway sandwiches Michael Dompig seems to be promoting.

 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Anna on March 07, 2008, 01:52:44 AM
I once posted that Kawish had "those Charlie Manson eyes" and was a bit taken aback when a short time later he started posting and asked me just what I meant by that!!!   ::MonkeyShocked::

Nothing like having the charlie take offense--was sort of scary for a bit.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on March 07, 2008, 01:56:26 AM
Michael Dompig makes the big time, lol  ::MonkeyHaHa::

At least they toned down the eyes.  ::MonkeyEek::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Anna on March 07, 2008, 01:56:40 AM
Was out earlier and am disappointed the program was canceled but not surprised that Julia would try to take advantage of a legal cancellation to promote her sensationalism.

But I do think it was fear of multiple lawsuits that likely caused this to not be aired.  Paulus if Patrick actually said his name and Beth and Jug and others if they aired the psycho psychics.

I am thinking with the new attorney for Beth in The Netherlands, Renee is going to find it much more difficult to get her fabrication aired there as well as any network would be advised by their legal department not to do that.

jmo


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: jackb on March 07, 2008, 01:57:07 AM
More on the shoes--it never ends.

Note I believe it was Tromp saying the shoes were new which Joran also said and that he, Joran, wanted them back because of this.

Then later he was reported saying on Aruban Radio I think Chanel 90 that they were old so he didn't mind that they were lost, just forget about shoes, etc.

The SHOES are in the Twilight Zone as well!  The things that will make you go crazy if you think about them too long.

 ::MonkeyConfused::



What he wants, he really, really wants is the one in the cage, but we got it (maybe.)  They had one and disposed of it, along with the other evidence that is now in the cage.  They were afraid the other one would turn up  so in order to make sure it does not get into the hands of honest lab techs, they they want first dubbs on it. They never  had the other shoe, just the one they thought they disposed of that is most likely in the cage where they put other evidence.  They were collecting evidence to hide and/or destroy the whole time and finding out through the tiplines who knew what and dealt with them.  That is a no-win situation for justice and the people who are under the false idea the police are to protect and serve them.  It is downright dangerous.   Jack B.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on March 07, 2008, 02:00:51 AM
More on the missing shoe (s):

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8798488/

SCARBOROUGH:  Explain to us about Joran van der Sloot‘s shoes and how that actually is now a part of this investigation. 

KOSINSKI:  Police have been pretty tightlipped about this.  There have been rumors about them looking for a shoe in various places.  Today, we know from police they‘re actually looking for a pair of sneakers, K-Swiss blue and white striped sneaker.  We even know the size, size 14.  So, they put out some detail there. 

We know that, when they drained that field and pond, we‘d been told that they were looking for something like that, some evidence.  They won‘t go so far as to tell us that they think these were lost on the night Natalee disappeared.  But obviously they see them as having some potential evidentiary value because they‘ve been looking for them, they tell us, along beaches, other locations on this island.  And they want those sneakers found.



...or maybe they found an empty shoe box.  How would you actually know that something is missing unless there is some proof that it actually existed in the first place?
Hi BH...I've been wondering about those shoes also....in the car tapes with Patrick....Just why would Joran have even mentioned that He threw them in the ditch or whatever....I think that He is very worried about the shoes because He doesn't know what happened to them and He's trying to distance himself from them just like when He mentions that the person that helped Him dispose of Natalee wasn't his parents...I mean why even bring them up...that is the shoes and his parents...makes you go HMMMMM  ::MonkeyWink:: ::MonkeyConfused:: 

When he said he threw them 'in the ditch' maybe he meant he shoved them, um, down Paulus' throat.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on March 07, 2008, 02:04:10 AM
Two very long articles accusing the AVP of Fraud,Extortion/Assortment of crimes and being a Mafia Organization..But I won't bore you with that..Time for a quick advertisement by Subway  ::MonkeyEek::

(http://img443.imageshack.us/img443/6031/michaelzr4.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)



  That appears to be Michael Dompeeg modeling for Subway.  Jackb

Looks like he is watching a cockroach crawl across the floor. 

I wonder if this is his reward for keeping quiet?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: hotping on March 07, 2008, 02:06:09 AM
More on the missing shoe (s):

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8798488/

SCARBOROUGH:  Explain to us about Joran van der Sloot‘s shoes and how that actually is now a part of this investigation. 

KOSINSKI:  Police have been pretty tightlipped about this.  There have been rumors about them looking for a shoe in various places.  Today, we know from police they‘re actually looking for a pair of sneakers, K-Swiss blue and white striped sneaker.  We even know the size, size 14.  So, they put out some detail there. 

We know that, when they drained that field and pond, we‘d been told that they were looking for something like that, some evidence.  They won‘t go so far as to tell us that they think these were lost on the night Natalee disappeared.  But obviously they see them as having some potential evidentiary value because they‘ve been looking for them, they tell us, along beaches, other locations on this island.  And they want those sneakers found.



...or maybe they found an empty shoe box.  How would you actually know that something is missing unless there is some proof that it actually existed in the first place?
Hi BH...I've been wondering about those shoes also....in the car tapes with Patrick....Just why would Joran have even mentioned that He threw them in the ditch or whatever....I think that He is very worried about the shoes because He doesn't know what happened to them and He's trying to distance himself from them just like when He mentions that the person that helped Him dispose of Natalee wasn't his parents...I mean why even bring them up...that is the shoes and his parents...makes you go HMMMMM  ::MonkeyWink:: ::MonkeyConfused:: 

When he said he threw them 'in the ditch' maybe he meant he shoved them, um, down Paulus' throat.
Possibly....To Funny!  ::MonkeyHaHa::  ::MonkeyShocked:: ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Anna on March 07, 2008, 02:06:26 AM
Remember when something embarrassing was found on Joran's computer by FOBers and they said it had nothing to do with this but would just embarrass the Sloots?

I think blabby Joran has also shared this with Patrick, things he should not be telling about his own family and it is in the text messages, etc. 

I would much rather see Patrick make $ from a book than Joran for sure.  I have no problem with people getting ratings in exchange for news coverage.  That's how that works and all media coverage as long as it is reasonably accurate to that rough journalistic approximate standard, it keeps the story alive and the pressure on to resolve it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: katrien on March 07, 2008, 02:06:40 AM
Trying to read all the way back and get caught up.

Patrick has already said he thinks Daury = Daddy so I don't think the program was cancelled because he said that again but do think it might be Paulus as the one threatening to sue.

Also Mos might have warned that program host that he could also be sued for airing the statements of the psycho psychics which is what I was fearful was his intent for this cancelled program.  Was dreading that all day.

Now it's all "poof" but I think that is the reason the psycho psychic stuff and this host is trying to blame it on Patrick some way or other.

jmo

I read on Fok that the program was cancelled. This was to be expected, because on of the trolls on Fok (Rosita, the same troll who linked to the article) told a few days ago already that the show might not be on television after all.

Now on Fok it is written that the program is cancelled because of the programmaker was threatened bij this Patrick. ::MonkeyHaHa::

Is Rosita, as Johan555 asked her on Fok, indeed Renee Gielen?
Does this mean that Aruba TV is in the plot? What is the real reason they cancelled the show?

A while ago I read an open letter to Beth (one of the trolls on Fok showed us the letter). This letter contained terrible accusings toward Beth.

In the other case I was telling about, once there appeared an open letter to the innocent man on Internet. The letters a look alikes.
Besides that, from one of the posters I recognise the style of writing (Mr. B. himself) but this can be a coincidence of course.

Are Stan de Jong and Renee Gielen working together in this?




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on March 07, 2008, 02:07:10 AM
More on the shoes--it never ends.

Note I believe it was Tromp saying the shoes were new which Joran also said and that he, Joran, wanted them back because of this.

Then later he was reported saying on Aruban Radio I think Chanel 90 that they were old so he didn't mind that they were lost, just forget about shoes, etc.

The SHOES are in the Twilight Zone as well!  The things that will make you go crazy if you think about them too long.

 ::MonkeyConfused::



Once in a while those shoes go walking through my head.

Is that the name of a song?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: jackb on March 07, 2008, 02:07:40 AM

If one was really cover all bases then the collateral evidence would NOT be disposed of with the body. I would assume Paulus would not take that chance. However, since Joran is so unflinching in his comfort that "they will never find her" then an all-in disposal of the body and evidence might have occured.


So comforted in his own words he went home and slept like a baby.

The material that appears to be in the cage looks as though someone tried to burn it and parts were scorched.  They probably figured if it was all together it would less likely to be found and if any of it was found it all might as well be found.    Jackb


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: hotping on March 07, 2008, 02:12:03 AM

If one was really cover all bases then the collateral evidence would NOT be disposed of with the body. I would assume Paulus would not take that chance. However, since Joran is so unflinching in his comfort that "they will never find her" then an all-in disposal of the body and evidence might have occured.


So comforted in his own words he went home and slept like a baby.

The material that appears to be in the cage looks as though someone tried to burn it and parts were scorched.  They probably figured if it was all together it would less likely to be found and if any of it was found it all might as well be found.    Jackb
::MonkeyShocked:: ::MonkeyEek::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Anna on March 07, 2008, 02:13:57 AM
Katrien,

Yes, that is why many of us are still here, the horrible manner in which Beth has been treated by the supporters of the Sloots and Aruba in this.

I was new to crime forums and I do understand your shock and outrage that people would do this to the family of a crime vicim.

One of the most shocking aspects of all of this and one I never expected either.  It is hurtful to read those things and when it gets to be too much, I do what Beth does and just ignore them all.

In the long run, there are people who cheer for the germs in sewer commercials in this old world of ours, sadly.  People are attracted to their own kind, I do believe, however, and those of good will see the truth despite all the lies told.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on March 07, 2008, 02:14:12 AM
More on the shoes--it never ends.

Note I believe it was Tromp saying the shoes were new which Joran also said and that he, Joran, wanted them back because of this.

Then later he was reported saying on Aruban Radio I think Chanel 90 that they were old so he didn't mind that they were lost, just forget about shoes, etc.

The SHOES are in the Twilight Zone as well!  The things that will make you go crazy if you think about them too long.

 ::MonkeyConfused::



What he wants, he really, really wants is the one in the cage, but we got it (maybe.)  They had one and disposed of it, along with the other evidence that is now in the cage.  They were afraid the other one would turn up  so in order to make sure it does not get into the hands of honest lab techs, they they want first dubbs on it. They never  had the other shoe, just the one they thought they disposed of that is most likely in the cage where they put other evidence.  They were collecting evidence to hide and/or destroy the whole time and finding out through the tiplines who knew what and dealt with them.  That is a no-win situation for justice and the people who are under the false idea the police are to protect and serve them.  It is downright dangerous.   Jack B.

I got it! :2thinky:

They put Natalee in one of those size 14s and took her out to sea.  The evidence went in the other PT14.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: hotping on March 07, 2008, 02:18:07 AM
More on the shoes--it never ends.

Note I believe it was Tromp saying the shoes were new which Joran also said and that he, Joran, wanted them back because of this.

Then later he was reported saying on Aruban Radio I think Chanel 90 that they were old so he didn't mind that they were lost, just forget about shoes, etc.

The SHOES are in the Twilight Zone as well!  The things that will make you go crazy if you think about them too long.

 ::MonkeyConfused::



Once in a while those shoes go walking through my head.

Is that the name of a song?
Pretty Darn Close! These Boots Were Made for Walking! Nancy Sinatra....That Makes Me wonder maybe He did where the cream colored boots that night and Daury had the KSwiss...either way I bet both pairs are missing.... ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Anna on March 07, 2008, 02:20:23 AM

I read on Fok that the program was cancelled. This was to be expected, because on of the trolls on Fok (Rosita, the same troll who linked to the article) told a few days ago already that the show might not be on television after all.

Now on Fok it is written that the program is cancelled because of the programmaker was threatened bij this Patrick. ::MonkeyHaHa::

Is Rosita, as Johan555 asked her on Fok, indeed Renee Gielen?
Does this mean that Aruba TV is in the plot? What is the real reason they cancelled the show?

A while ago I read an open letter to Beth (one of the trolls on Fok showed us the letter). This letter contained terrible accusings toward Beth.

In the other case I was telling about, once there appeared an open letter to the innocent man on Internet. The letters a look alikes.
Besides that, from one of the posters I recognise the style of writing (Mr. B. himself) but this can be a coincidence of course.

Are Stan de Jong and Renee Gielen working together in this?





I think they all work loosely together, probably independent of each other but all acting in the best interest so they wrongly think of the tourism of Aruba.

That, for me, is the source of all the evil that has come from all this, the Aruban tourism industry paying people to say and do these things to discredit this victim and her family.  They formed a Strategic Command Force of sorts within two weeks of Natalee disappearing, for example, and began their counters smears and propaganda.

It is too bad that effort did not go into resolving this in a just and honorable manner for that was all anyone ever asked in this regard.

So that is why I am still here and even at this late hour for I got home late tonight, I am here for Beth now as Natalee is beyond my help.  The more they attack Beth, the more I want to defend and sustain her and her efforts to find justice for her child.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Anna on March 07, 2008, 02:24:53 AM
More on the shoes--it never ends.

Note I believe it was Tromp saying the shoes were new which Joran also said and that he, Joran, wanted them back because of this.

Then later he was reported saying on Aruban Radio I think Chanel 90 that they were old so he didn't mind that they were lost, just forget about shoes, etc.

The SHOES are in the Twilight Zone as well!  The things that will make you go crazy if you think about them too long.

 ::MonkeyConfused::



Once in a while those shoes go walking through my head.

Is that the name of a song?


(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/thththsneakersblack1.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on March 07, 2008, 02:26:22 AM
More on the shoes--it never ends.

Note I believe it was Tromp saying the shoes were new which Joran also said and that he, Joran, wanted them back because of this.

Then later he was reported saying on Aruban Radio I think Chanel 90 that they were old so he didn't mind that they were lost, just forget about shoes, etc.

The SHOES are in the Twilight Zone as well!  The things that will make you go crazy if you think about them too long.

 ::MonkeyConfused::



Once in a while those shoes go walking through my head.

Is that the name of a song?
Pretty Darn Close! These Boots Were Made for Walking! Nancy Sinatra....That Makes Me wonder maybe He did where the cream colored boots that night and Daury had the KSwiss...either way I bet both pairs are missing.... ::MonkeyWink::

Yes, or maybe the light was shined on the KSwiss in order to keep the focus off the boots.

I think the song is a combination of Those Boots Were Made for Walking and Raindrops Keep Falling on My Head.
                                   ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on March 07, 2008, 02:29:55 AM

I read on Fok that the program was cancelled. This was to be expected, because on of the trolls on Fok (Rosita, the same troll who linked to the article) told a few days ago already that the show might not be on television after all.

Now on Fok it is written that the program is cancelled because of the programmaker was threatened bij this Patrick. ::MonkeyHaHa::

Is Rosita, as Johan555 asked her on Fok, indeed Renee Gielen?
Does this mean that Aruba TV is in the plot? What is the real reason they cancelled the show?

A while ago I read an open letter to Beth (one of the trolls on Fok showed us the letter). This letter contained terrible accusings toward Beth.

In the other case I was telling about, once there appeared an open letter to the innocent man on Internet. The letters a look alikes.
Besides that, from one of the posters I recognise the style of writing (Mr. B. himself) but this can be a coincidence of course.

Are Stan de Jong and Renee Gielen working together in this?





I think they all work loosely together, probably independent of each other but all acting in the best interest so they wrongly think of the tourism of Aruba.

That, for me, is the source of all the evil that has come from all this, the Aruban tourism industry paying people to say and do these things to discredit this victim and her family.  They formed a Strategic Command Force of sorts within two weeks of Natalee disappearing, for example, and began their counters smears and propaganda.

It is too bad that effort did not go into resolving this in a just and honorable manner for that was all anyone ever asked in this regard.

So that is why I am still here and even at this late hour for I got home late tonight, I am here for Beth now as Natalee is beyond my help.  The more they attack Beth, the more I want to defend and sustain her and her efforts to find justice for her child.

.

  :thumleft: :thumleft:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Anna on March 07, 2008, 02:30:07 AM
When ALE are not having their Frosted Flakes, I understand this is their cereal of choice:

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/th568qr.jpg)

Could account for the level of their investigative skills.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: hotping on March 07, 2008, 02:30:51 AM
More on the shoes--it never ends.

Note I believe it was Tromp saying the shoes were new which Joran also said and that he, Joran, wanted them back because of this.

Then later he was reported saying on Aruban Radio I think Chanel 90 that they were old so he didn't mind that they were lost, just forget about shoes, etc.

The SHOES are in the Twilight Zone as well!  The things that will make you go crazy if you think about them too long.

 ::MonkeyConfused::



Once in a while those shoes go walking through my head.

Is that the name of a song?
Pretty Darn Close! These Boots Were Made for Walking! Nancy Sinatra....That Makes Me wonder maybe He did where the cream colored boots that night and Daury had the KSwiss...either way I bet both pairs are missing.... ::MonkeyWink::

Yes, or maybe the light was shined on the KSwiss in order to keep the focus off the boots.

I think the song is a combination of Those Boots Were Made for Walking and Raindrops Keep Falling on My Head.
                                   ::MonkeyWink::
Yep!  ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyWink::  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: hotping on March 07, 2008, 02:32:20 AM
When ALE are not having their Frosted Flakes, I understand this is their cereal of choice:

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/th568qr.jpg)

Could account for the level of their investigative skills.

.
::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on March 07, 2008, 02:32:53 AM
More on the shoes--it never ends.

Note I believe it was Tromp saying the shoes were new which Joran also said and that he, Joran, wanted them back because of this.

Then later he was reported saying on Aruban Radio I think Chanel 90 that they were old so he didn't mind that they were lost, just forget about shoes, etc.

The SHOES are in the Twilight Zone as well!  The things that will make you go crazy if you think about them too long.

 ::MonkeyConfused::



Once in a while those shoes go walking through my head.

Is that the name of a song?


(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/thththsneakersblack1.gif)

 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::

Every time that poster comes on, I think of those shoes.  Maybe that's why we have been talking about it in here so much.  Subliminal posting!!

  ::MonkeyShocked:: ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on March 07, 2008, 02:35:45 AM
When ALE are not having their Frosted Flakes, I understand this is their cereal of choice:

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/th568qr.jpg)

Could account for the level of their investigative skills.

.

 :smt045 :smt045 :smt045


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Anna on March 07, 2008, 02:37:13 AM
Dompig's own personal favorite was always

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/25zjuh0_th.jpg)

I see Spooky out there.  Big HI THERE to SPOOKY!


This was found on the wall of Aruban Modeling School for Males as example of the desired look with regard to the eyes so I am told

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/2vwsl15_th.png)

And with that bit of silliness I will head for the ole Monkey Bunkey.  Been a long day and a bit of a disappointing one for was hoping Patrick was going to be on just blasting them out of the water but I think the host was scared by the prospect of lawsuits from all parties and just plain chickened out.

He prolly asked Mos if suits were possible and Mos said yes so he is saying Mos said he couldn't show the program.  That's how they roll, lying all the way!

G'nite all.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: hotping on March 07, 2008, 02:39:07 AM
Good Night Anna!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on March 07, 2008, 02:39:19 AM
Nite, Anna.
   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: suisse71 on March 07, 2008, 03:07:51 AM
OMG is that Jacobs?
Of course it is!  ::MonkeyTongue::  ::MonkeyWink::

OMG that IS Dennis Jacobs.  Clearly he is not the 1 in 4 with the cocaine problem. Kids this is why you do not eat food with High Fructose Corn Syrup ie. Frosted Flakes. Sorry guys, but that guy could not outrun a turtle much less catch a criminal. Between Jacobs and Rudy and Joran, they are all just frightening.

j4n!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: suisse71 on March 07, 2008, 03:31:21 AM
Two very long articles accusing the AVP of Fraud,Extortion/Assortment of crimes and being a Mafia Organization..But I won't bore you with that..Time for a quick advertisement by Subway  ::MonkeyEek::

(http://img443.imageshack.us/img443/6031/michaelzr4.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)



  That appears to be Michael Dompeeg modeling for Subway.  Jackb
[/quote}

Looks like he is watching a cockroach crawl across the floor. 

I wonder if this is his reward for keeping quiet?


ZOOLANDER    ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: redheadedgal on March 07, 2008, 03:49:51 AM
LOL re: the cereal boxes!!

i know it's been said that the cage and it's contents are not related to natalee but something i think i see makes me ask:

how does material fair when submerged in water for almost 3 years? does it shred? does it fade? does it dissolve? or does it remain intact?

the reason i ask is b/c (and i know my eyes must be playing tricks on me or i'm seeing what i want to see) just underneath and to the left of the number 12 in the bottom picture, it looks like there are stripes in the exact two colors and in the pattern of the halter top natalee was wearing in her last photos...


http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2641.480 (http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2641.480)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: katrien on March 07, 2008, 06:43:50 AM
Aruba TV claims Patrick v.d. Eem threatened to kill the TV maker by phone.
The trolls claim there are loads of witnesses. How do these witnesses know?
Was this phonecall recorded?

Can the phonecall be broadcasted?  Not? I quessed so. ::MonkeyNoNo::

Aruba TV recorded v.d. Eem secretly. Why don't they have a tape of this phonecall? ::MonkeyConfused::

Why are they too afraid to broadcast because they were threatened and at the same time are not too afraid to tell that they were threatened. Does this make sence?

But coincidental this specific phonecall was not recorded? ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: KatzHome on March 07, 2008, 07:17:16 AM
Good morning!

I just heard the news from my mechanic ~ that Joran has talked!!! ~ I'm so glad I needed a new radiator in my car and that the car got fixed yesterday & Eric came over my house with the breaking news!

His basic summary was this:

Joran got friendly with the local drug dealer and started making vague references to what happened, saying stuff like "man, you just don't know the secrets that I have, and the drug dealer just listened and acted like he didn't know what Joarn was talking about. Then the drug dealer go in touch with America's Most Wanted (or someone like that who the Monkeys know) and it was arranged that the drug dealer would just let Joran talk... his every word and mannerism recorded. The drug dealer got a new truck ~ all outfitted with various recording devices, both audio and video ~ cameras everywhere aimed at the passengers seat where Joran would be sitting ~ and eventually blabbing ~ which he did.

Joran got called back to Aruba for something ~ one last investigation or whatever ~ and he came back telling the drug dealer basically that he got away with it again... The drug dealer told him that he had some great deals going down, that he got a new truck out of all of it, and urged Joran to hurry on over, that they had some "business" to attend to.

And now the investigators have about a years worth of Joran's talking about what happened that night ~ that Joran, Deepak and Satish have all been arrested again ~ and there are divers in Aruba once again looking for Natalie's body ~ because Joran even told where her body was dumped ~ about 5 miles off shore in the ocean.

Is all this, that my mechanic told me, about right?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on March 07, 2008, 07:34:19 AM
Trying to read all the way back and get caught up.

Patrick has already said he thinks Daury = Daddy so I don't think the program was cancelled because he said that again but do think it might be Paulus as the one threatening to sue.

Also Mos might have warned that program host that he could also be sued for airing the statements of the psycho psychics which is what I was fearful was his intent for this cancelled program.  Was dreading that all day.

Now it's all "poof" but I think that is the reason the psycho psychic stuff and this host is trying to blame it on Patrick some way or other.

jmo


Hi Anna..... Last week when all the mystery was spouted re: Patrick being on Telearuba I figured the host was going to pull out the psycho psychics too.
Whenever someone says 'look at other options or new ideas' it seems the psycho psychics or Renee Gielen or some other Beth/Family hater gets to have their say on it. I was sure this would happen on the now cancelled program. So I agree with you :)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on March 07, 2008, 07:36:45 AM
I feel like I am having a flashback.......

KatzHome ..... all this has already played out over the past several months. I am not sure why you are posting it. As a review?? Or did you really just hear about all of it?

I am lost....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: KatzHome on March 07, 2008, 07:42:00 AM
Good morning, Peaches!  How are you? Are things going well ~ I like your new picture! ::MonkeyWink::

And yes ~ I'm gathering that the drug dealer that my mechanic told me about, who helped so very much, name is Patrick.

Very cool of him ~ very cool.


I agree, Anna.  Patrick is totally a hero.  I bet he has questions he wished he had asked too.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: KatzHome on March 07, 2008, 07:53:38 AM
Yes, it's exactly like I just posted ~ I just heard, on Thursday, March 6th at about 2:30 in the afternoon, that because of the help of a drug dealer, that Joran, Deepack and Satish have all been arrested again.

That Joran admitted to this guy, who's name I think is Patrick, that Natalie's body was dumped in the ocean by a friend who has a boat ~ was it that guy who is a friend of theirs who it was said crawled into bed with his parents because of having nightmares?

My mechanic spoke as if they had just been arrested yesterday morning ~ or within the last couple of days.

I'm sorry, you're not having flashbacks ~ I just found out yesterday ~ I'm sorry for not knowing anything ~ but I've been involved in drawing and graphics work and I just don't turn on the television, I gave up the Dish network again ~ and I'm just not up on any of this...

I feel like I am having a flashback.......

KatzHome ..... all this has already played out over the past several months. I am not sure why you are posting it. As a review?? Or did you really just hear about all of it?

I am lost....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Jo-An on March 07, 2008, 07:57:27 AM
Yes, it's exactly like I just posted ~ I just heard, on Thursday, March 6th at about 2:30 in the afternoon, that because of the help of a drug dealer, that Joran, Deepack and Satish have all been arrested again.

That Joran admitted to this guy, who's name I think is Patrick, that Natalie's body was dumped in the ocean by a friend who has a boat ~ was it that guy who is a friend of theirs who it was said crawled into bed with his parents because of having nightmares?

My mechanic spoke as if they had just been arrested yesterday morning ~ or within the last couple of days.

I'm sorry, you're not having flashbacks ~ I just found out yesterday ~ I'm sorry for not knowing anything ~ but I've been involved in drawing and graphics work and I just don't turn on the television, I gave up the Dish network again ~ and I'm just not up on any of this...

I feel like I am having a flashback.......

KatzHome ..... all this has already played out over the past several months. I am not sure why you are posting it. As a review?? Or did you really just hear about all of it?

I am lost....

Joran did confess to Patrick but this was months/weeks ago.
The tapes were broadcasted in the Netherlands on Feb 3rd and the day after that on 20/20 in the US.
I knew the investigation was re-opened but I don't know about the guys being arrested again though...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: KatzHome on March 07, 2008, 07:59:25 AM
Very cute, Klaas ~ I'm gathering from this that it's come out that Joran's parents had full knowledge of what happened that night ~ is this right?

For those that missed it yesterday - click on play   ::MonkeyHaHa::

http://llnw.jibjab.com/content/player.swf?content_url=http://www.jibjab.com/sendables/api/remote/gJV7RXtucHG09M0FjC93b39k.xml


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 07, 2008, 08:00:55 AM
Yes, it's exactly like I just posted ~ I just heard, on Thursday, March 6th at about 2:30 in the afternoon, that because of the help of a drug dealer, that Joran, Deepack and Satish have all been arrested again.

That Joran admitted to this guy, who's name I think is Patrick, that Natalie's body was dumped in the ocean by a friend who has a boat ~ was it that guy who is a friend of theirs who it was said crawled into bed with his parents because of having nightmares?

My mechanic spoke as if they had just been arrested yesterday morning ~ or within the last couple of days.

I'm sorry, you're not having flashbacks ~ I just found out yesterday ~ I'm sorry for not knowing anything ~ but I've been involved in drawing and graphics work and I just don't turn on the television, I gave up the Dish network again ~ and I'm just not up on any of this...

I feel like I am having a flashback.......

KatzHome ..... all this has already played out over the past several months. I am not sure why you are posting it. As a review?? Or did you really just hear about all of it?

I am lost....

 ::MonkeyEek:: ::MonkeyEek:: ::MonkeyEek:: ::MonkeyEek::
 ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: KatzHome on March 07, 2008, 08:05:21 AM
Thanks Jo-An! I didn't know it was so long ago that this happened...

I'm gonna have to find out what's going on.

I saw on page 1 of this thread that it was posted that nothing is happening still and yet to Joran ~ even though he admitted everything ~ I don't see how this can be ~ but I guess it's just Aruba... I don't know...



Joran did confess to Patrick but this was months/weeks ago.
The tapes were broadcasted in the Netherlands on Feb 3rd and the day after that on 20/20 in the US.
I knew the investigation was re-opened but I don't know about the guys being arrested again though...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Jo-An on March 07, 2008, 08:11:56 AM
Thanks Jo-An! I didn't know it was so long ago that this happened...

I'm gonna have to find out what's going on.

I saw on page 1 of this thread that it was posted that nothing is happening still and yet to Joran ~ even though he admitted everything ~ I don't see how this can be ~ but I guess it's just Aruba... I don't know...



Joran did confess to Patrick but this was months/weeks ago.
The tapes were broadcasted in the Netherlands on Feb 3rd and the day after that on 20/20 in the US.
I knew the investigation was re-opened but I don't know about the guys being arrested again though...

OMG, You have a lot of catching up to do!!  ::MonkeyWink::
Summary:
Patrick and Dutch crime reporter Peter R de Vries set up this hidden camera thing in order to get Joran to confess.
He did.
Peter showed the tapes to Hans Mos in Aruba.
Mos said that this was enough to have Joran arrested again.
But the judges said it wasn't enough: all Joran did was confess to disposing of a body and you can't be arrested for that without real proof.
So now Joran is hiding somewhere (probably in Germany) and the case is re-opened and Joran is a murdersuspect.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: KatzHome on March 07, 2008, 08:14:16 AM
We need to get this right:

No matter what Mos says Joran is no longer a suspect.

Joran was released as a suspect in December and can not be watched, listened to, or surveiled.

Until Joran is rearrested under suspision of a crime, he can not legally be a suspect.

Joran can not be rearrested until physical evidence or a verifiable witness can be found.

Joran is free of judicial suspision and is in no way a legal suspect.

Joran has not been charged with a crime and there is not and may never be a trial date.

The only effect on Joran is that he is a "persona non grata"


I dont agree with it but thats how it is, under their system.

I also need to add:

The Kalpoes were released as suspects and cleared of all suspision in December

The Police authorities are forbidden from requestioning Joran or his many friends without a judges approval

The investigation can only proceed if new evidence is found, until that time there is no investigation.

::sigh:: And I'm gathering that that's where things stand today ~ that even though Joran admitted what happened to Natalie ~ that legally, nothing can be done yet...

I guess I have it right now... maybe...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: KatzHome on March 07, 2008, 08:19:26 AM
Thanks so very much, Jo-An for bringing me up to date...

The judge wants real proof ~ are we back again to needing her body to be found?

Have any of our divers gone there to search for her body ~ like divers from Texas EquaSearch or anything like that?

Thanks Jo-An! I didn't know it was so long ago that this happened...

I'm gonna have to find out what's going on.

I saw on page 1 of this thread that it was posted that nothing is happening still and yet to Joran ~ even though he admitted everything ~ I don't see how this can be ~ but I guess it's just Aruba... I don't know...



Joran did confess to Patrick but this was months/weeks ago.
The tapes were broadcasted in the Netherlands on Feb 3rd and the day after that on 20/20 in the US.
I knew the investigation was re-opened but I don't know about the guys being arrested again though...

OMG, You have a lot of catching up to do!!  ::MonkeyWink::
Summary:
Patrick and Dutch crime reporter Peter R de Vries set up this hidden camera thing in order to get Joran to confess.
He did.
Peter showed the tapes to Hans Mos in Aruba.
Mos said that this was enough to have Joran arrested again.
But the judges said it wasn't enough: all Joran did was confess to disposing of a body and you can't be arrested for that without real proof.
So now Joran is hiding somewhere (probably in Germany) and the case is re-opened and Joran is a murdersuspect.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Jo-An on March 07, 2008, 08:23:49 AM
There is a separate thread about the ocean search!

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2438.0


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: KatzHome on March 07, 2008, 08:43:24 AM
Once again, Jo-An, thank you ~ I just popped that link open in a new tab ~ I'll read through it a bit and then head off to bed or a nap.

One thing about Joran finally admitting to their disposing of Natalie's body ~ at least it dispels the talk that was going on over a year ago about Natalie being kidnapped and held in another country...

I prayed so much back then for Beth and Dave to find out what really happened to Natalee.

I know that if my child was missing, and there was any thought of her being held captive somewhere ~ that that thought would be the one to have me wake up at night screaming...

I still don't know if there will be justice dealt to any of them here on earth ~ but I do know that, in the end, that they'll all meet their Maker, and that with God, there will be justice ~ ALL of them will pay for whatever part each of them played in Natalee's death, disappearance and the subsequent cover-up which caused so much pain ~ and for everything else that was done to Natalee's family in the weeks and months afterwards.

There is a separate thread about the ocean search!

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2438.0


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on March 07, 2008, 08:46:25 AM
Purple Roses at BFN posted:

Poentje Castro

http://www.zorpia.com/onedayin


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: snoopy on March 07, 2008, 08:46:50 AM


Good Morning Everybody!!

Subway is never going to be the same agaim.

Somebody bring out the barf box.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: BUCKSHOT on March 07, 2008, 08:57:00 AM
PATRICK Maar ik weet wie het lichaam in zee heeft gegooid.
But i know who threw the body into the ocean
.

I contend that IF this is correct and Patrick did say that, it's a huge development and he needs to be interrogated throughly and immediately.
Who's to say that Patrick has not given a statement....We just don't know what He said in it .....seems like in the last week or so He went to see Mos.....correct me if I'm wrong ::MonkeyConfused::

Are we able to obtain / read Patrick's PV ?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: BUCKSHOT on March 07, 2008, 08:57:41 AM
PATRICK Maar ik weet wie het lichaam in zee heeft gegooid.
But i know who threw the body into the ocean
.

I contend that IF this is correct and Patrick did say that, it's a huge development and he needs to be interrogated throughly and immediately.
Who's to say that Patrick has not given a statement....We just don't know what He said in it .....seems like in the last week or so He went to see Mos.....correct me if I'm wrong ::MonkeyConfused::

Are we able to obtain / read Patrick's PV ?

Patrick should have a copy, correct ?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: oceanexploration on March 07, 2008, 09:08:42 AM
From Kyle:

So, if I understand this right, it IS possible that the trap in the Dateline video MAY have been the trap stolen from the fish hut??

I think it's possible,but the trap that was reported stolen was a bit smaller.

As you already know, the trap dimensions you are familiar with came from Dr. Hodges.  To my knowledge, he did not speak with the fisherman who owned the hut which was broken into.  He spoke with the owner of the fishermans huts. 
Not that it is of any consequence, because the fisherman who leases the hut which was broken into 1) doesn't speak a lick of English 2) likely fishes mainly at night and 3) the trap likely didn't belong to the fisherman who's hut was broken into.  I walked by the huts about 5-6 times a day for 4 straight days during the time of day Hodges went to the Huts to learn as much as possible. I didn't encounter that fisherman once.  However, I spoke to the fisherman next to the one that was broken into who was often sitting out front of his hut.  He could only say hello in English. 

Regardless of the questionable applicability of the information, we decided to use the dimensions Dr. Hodges provided to serve as a baseline or minimum sonar target.

As for the trap being the one that was reportedly next to the fisherman's huts...I honestly don't know and can't prove that it is or isn't at this point.  I believe early on Dompig referred to the fish trap as being HUGE at one point.  A 5'x 4' trap hardly qualifies as huge. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: BUCKSHOT on March 07, 2008, 09:09:38 AM
If you want Joran's missing shoe(s), just ask Dennis Jacobs; he probably has them locked in his desk drawer.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: oceanexploration on March 07, 2008, 09:12:22 AM
Jackb - that is how Kyle sent it to me.  I have no idea why the white square in the upper right hand corner.

I cut a thumbnail image of the actual sonar target of the trap out of the picture.  I didn't want it posted because I don't have rights over the sonar data.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: wreck on March 07, 2008, 09:17:19 AM
If you want Joran's missing shoe(s), just ask Dennis Jacobs; he probably has them locked in his desk drawer.

....uhhhh.... I think they were "digested" years ago.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on March 07, 2008, 09:24:58 AM
more of the same ole'
Today's Dutch News in English (they are always a day behind :roll: )

'Friend' knows who dumped Natalee
Friday 07 March 2008

Patrick van der Eem, the man who helped secretly record Joran van der Sloot confessing to being with Natalee Holloway when she died, has himself been secretly recorded by an Aruban tv company, Dutch media report on Friday.

After an interview on a local television station, Van der Eem carried on talking, thinking the cameras had been switched off.

But instead he was recorded saying that he knew who had dumped Natalee’s body at sea and that Van der Sloot had asked him for €2,000 to buy the man’s silence, the Telegraaf reports.

Van der Eem was also heard saying he had known Van der Sloot for several years. On Peter R de Vries’ tv programme, he claimed he befriended the Dutch student in a Nijmegen casino in 2007.

According to the Telegraaf, Van der Eem expects to become a millionaire because of his role in the Holloway affair. ‘And I will make sure that Joran and his entire family fall flat on their face. They had better emigrate to Africa,’ the paper quoted Van der Eem as saying.

Parts of the interview, which was recorded in Papiamento two weeks ago, have already been aired by TeleAruba. The interview was made following the news that Van der Eem has signed a US book deal.

News agency ANP reports that Van der Eem was furious after the partial broadcasts and has threatened interviewer Poentje Castro. Castro is seeking legal advice, ANP said.


http://www.dutchnews.nl/news/archives/2008/03/friend_knows_who_dumped_natale.php


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: BUCKSHOT on March 07, 2008, 09:27:29 AM
Is Patrick beginning to flip to the other side? Or are speculations just misinformation?

Patrick knowing Joran for years...
Patrick withholding info about body disposal person(s)...
Patrick doing everything for money, instead of doing everything to help sovle case...

He did, after all, meet with Hans Mos in Aruba, the spin machine.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on March 07, 2008, 09:27:56 AM
Good morning!

I just heard the news from my mechanic ~ that Joran has talked!!! ~ I'm so glad I needed a new radiator in my car and that the car got fixed yesterday & Eric came over my house with the breaking news!

His basic summary was this:

Joran got friendly with the local drug dealer and started making vague references to what happened, saying stuff like "man, you just don't know the secrets that I have, and the drug dealer just listened and acted like he didn't know what Joarn was talking about. Then the drug dealer go in touch with America's Most Wanted (or someone like that who the Monkeys know) and it was arranged that the drug dealer would just let Joran talk... his every word and mannerism recorded. The drug dealer got a new truck ~ all outfitted with various recording devices, both audio and video ~ cameras everywhere aimed at the passengers seat where Joran would be sitting ~ and eventually blabbing ~ which he did.

Joran got called back to Aruba for something ~ one last investigation or whatever ~ and he came back telling the drug dealer basically that he got away with it again... The drug dealer told him that he had some great deals going down, that he got a new truck out of all of it, and urged Joran to hurry on over, that they had some "business" to attend to.

And now the investigators have about a years worth of Joran's talking about what happened that night ~ that Joran, Deepak and Satish have all been arrested again ~ and there are divers in Aruba once again looking for Natalie's body ~ because Joran even told where her body was dumped ~ about 5 miles off shore in the ocean.

Is all this, that my mechanic told me, about right?

In short, No.  I am sure by now another monkey has set you straight.

Katz, I have been missing my other bear-pal in the cage.  Come back and visit.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on March 07, 2008, 09:35:53 AM
Thanks Jo-An! I didn't know it was so long ago that this happened...

I'm gonna have to find out what's going on.

I saw on page 1 of this thread that it was posted that nothing is happening still and yet to Joran ~ even though he admitted everything ~ I don't see how this can be ~ but I guess it's just Aruba... I don't know...



Joran did confess to Patrick but this was months/weeks ago.
The tapes were broadcasted in the Netherlands on Feb 3rd and the day after that on 20/20 in the US.
I knew the investigation was re-opened but I don't know about the guys being arrested again though...

OMG, You have a lot of catching up to do!!  ::MonkeyWink::
Summary:
Patrick and Dutch crime reporter Peter R de Vries set up this hidden camera thing in order to get Joran to confess.
He did.
Peter showed the tapes to Hans Mos in Aruba.
Mos said that this was enough to have Joran arrested again.
But the judges said it wasn't enough: all Joran did was confess to disposing of a body and you can't be arrested for that without real proof.
So now Joran is hiding somewhere (probably in Germany) and the case is re-opened and Joran is a murdersuspect.


I knew one of the smart monkeys would beat me to it.  Hi Jo-An.   :smt039


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: caesu on March 07, 2008, 09:39:15 AM
http://antilliaans.caribiana.nl/aruba/car20080307_vandereem

-telearuba did not allow the broadcast in which patrick supposedly said who dumped natalee in the ocean.
-telearuba says to taping might be illegal and is afraid for judicial consequences.
-poentjes lawyer thinks differently about that.
-poentje respects telearuba's decision but is trying to broadcast it elsewhe -  he is in talks with another aruba channel and a channel on curaçao and two broadcasters in the netherlands.
-patrick threatened to poentje with death. 15 collegeas of poentje were witness of that. poentje is going to report this to the police.
-peter r. de vries says all this is not a big deal. poentje only tried to play a trick on patrick just like patrick himself did (on joran). peter r. says no threats were made.

interview with poentje (mp3)
http://download.omroep.nl/rnw/smac/cms/car_uitzendverbod_20080307_44_1kHz.mp3


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on March 07, 2008, 09:43:03 AM
Purple Roses at BFN posted:

Poentje Castro

http://www.zorpia.com/onedayin

His favorite movie is One Flew Over the Cuckoos Nest, It;s de ja vu all over again.

           ::MonkeyEek:: ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Magnolia on March 07, 2008, 09:45:28 AM
Purple Roses at BFN posted:

Poentje Castro

http://www.zorpia.com/onedayin

He looked like an old man on the TeleAruba Show.
He must have dug really deep in the family photo album
to come up with those shots.
Wonder if he ever worked for Alexander Gottenbos.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Rob on March 07, 2008, 09:46:10 AM
Good Morning, I was reading about the possibility of the fisherman's boat being used. That was very intriguing and I had not considered it. So, kudos to who ever thought of that.

Here is a picture from ArubaGirl's website.

http://arubagirl.typepad.com/photos/aruba/dsc_0027.html

These are the boats shown. I also have a ton of my own beach photos and will look to see if I have any that show any boats in that area that look larger.

(http://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p149/Morgan2112_2006/FISHERMANHUTS1.jpg)

cropped and blown to 200%
(http://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p149/Morgan2112_2006/FISHERMANHUTS2.jpg)

This image is from Jan. 11 - 19, 2005, so it would be before Natalee went to Aruba and this is how I remember the boats.
(http://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p149/Morgan2112_2006/fishermanhutsboats2.jpg)

http://www.hammocktree.us/ms/Aruba05/Aruba05.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: vms on March 07, 2008, 09:46:32 AM
Purple Roses at BFN posted:

Poentje Castro

http://www.zorpia.com/onedayin



Poentje's Interests

<snipped>

Television Larry King (exluding the Nathalie Halloway show)

 http://www.myspace.com/undiadenbida 





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on March 07, 2008, 09:47:00 AM
XxX Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2008 9:41 am @ RU
Patrick didn't pay Joran, Joran paid Patrick so Patrick would keep his mouth shut about the name. That's how rumours started in the first place: no correct translation etc.


+++++++++++++++
Something Julia said at RU this morning coincides with something I had thought of when 'Daury' was first mentioned. I pondered it over in my head, but decided it was moot...what do you all think>> It almost makes me sick to think she and I think alike on this one, lol.  ::MonkeyEek::


Glenda Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2008 8:39 am
When I first heard the Name on De Vries show I googled it:
 
Payment of a Dowry, gift — often financial, has a long history in many parts of the world.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on March 07, 2008, 09:47:01 AM
If you want Joran's missing shoe(s), just ask Dennis Jacobs; he probably has them locked in his desk drawer.

Or he covered them with the chocolate that seems to flow so freely on the island and ate them.

                ::MonkeyShocked:: ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Jo-An on March 07, 2008, 09:50:22 AM
Is Patrick beginning to flip to the other side? Or are speculations just misinformation?

Patrick knowing Joran for years...
Patrick withholding info about body disposal person(s)...
Patrick doing everything for money, instead of doing everything to help sovle case...

He did, after all, meet with Hans Mos in Aruba, the spin machine.

Patrick and Joran knowing eachother for years - this was a mistranslation.

Withholding information about disposal - also somewhat of a mistranslation, Peter confirmed yesterday that Patrick doesn't know "who did it" but is highly suspicious of a certain person. Patrick knows Joran lied about the beach. He asked Poentje: "So where do you think it happened, at THE BEACH or AT HOME?"

Patrick is in it for the money - may be true, maybe the fame and all the compliments he got made him aware of the fact that he could  make a lot of money out of this (re. the book).

I'm very curious how this Patrick-thing will develop.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on March 07, 2008, 09:53:25 AM
Purple Roses at BFN posted:

Poentje Castro

http://www.zorpia.com/onedayin



Poentje's Interests

<snipped>

Television Larry King (exluding the Nathalie Halloway show)

 http://www.myspace.com/undiadenbida 





Which contradicts his General interest which is:  In people who are willing to help the ones in need.

I smell a hypocrite.

    ::MonkeyShocked::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Destiny on March 07, 2008, 09:54:00 AM
"Justice in Aruba wants nothing more than say that there are still investigation into what happened on the night that Holloway disappeared."



Yeah, sure, for nearly 3 friggin years!!!




I can see it now...5 generations down the line...case still being *investigated*...passed through the blood lines involved from the beginning...like some piece of heirloom furniture....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Jo-An on March 07, 2008, 09:54:16 AM
XxX Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2008 9:41 am @ RU
Patrick didn't pay Joran, Joran paid Patrick so Patrick would keep his mouth shut about the name. That's how rumours started in the first place: no correct translation etc.


+++++++++++++++
Something Julia said at RU this morning coincides with something I had thought of when 'Daury' was first mentioned. I pondered it over in my head, but decided it was moot...what do you all think>> It almost makes me sick to think she and I think alike on this one, lol.  ::MonkeyEek::


Glenda Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2008 8:39 am
When I first heard the Name on De Vries show I googled it:
 
Payment of a Dowry, gift — often financial, has a long history in many parts of the world.

I'm not sure if Joran would know the word "dowry".  ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: BUCKSHOT on March 07, 2008, 09:54:31 AM
Is Patrick beginning to flip to the other side? Or are speculations just misinformation?

Patrick knowing Joran for years...
Patrick withholding info about body disposal person(s)...
Patrick doing everything for money, instead of doing everything to help sovle case...

He did, after all, meet with Hans Mos in Aruba, the spin machine.

Patrick and Joran knowing eachother for years - this was a mistranslation.

Withholding information about disposal - also somewhat of a mistranslation, Peter confirmed yesterday that Patrick doesn't know "who did it" but is highly suspicious of a certain person. Patrick knows Joran lied about the beach. He asked Poentje: "So where do you think it happened, at THE BEACH or AT HOME?"

Patrick is in it for the money - may be true, maybe the fame and all the compliments he got made him aware of the fact that he could  make a lot of money out of this (re. the book).

I'm very curious how this Patrick-thing will develop.

Jo-An,
Thanks for clarification.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: vms on March 07, 2008, 09:55:10 AM
Purple Roses at BFN posted:

Poentje Castro

http://www.zorpia.com/onedayin



Poentje's Interests

<snipped>

Television Larry King (exluding the Nathalie Halloway show)

 http://www.myspace.com/undiadenbida 





Which contradicts his General interest which is:  In people who are willing to help the ones in need.

I smell a hypocrite.

    ::MonkeyShocked::


Agenda came to my mind also...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: BUCKSHOT on March 07, 2008, 09:58:43 AM
If you want Joran's missing shoe(s), just ask Dennis Jacobs; he probably has them locked in his desk drawer.

Or he covered them with the chocolate that seems to flow so freely on the island and ate them.

                ::MonkeyShocked:: ::MonkeyHaHa::

In America, we have "Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory"

In Aruba, they have "Dennis Jacobs and the Chocolate Factory"

Evidence is always dipped in chocolate, then licked off by Jacobs...

 ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Destiny on March 07, 2008, 10:11:12 AM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/alestrike.jpg)

I sure hope they give in to his demands..He may start shaking people down even the Dutch Tourists..How Much guilders do you have?  ::MonkeyEek:: ::MonkeyShocked::  ::MonkeyWaa::

Not enough to fill that belly...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: caesu on March 07, 2008, 10:11:40 AM
about the NOVA corruption series:

yesterday is was about curaçao.
about corruption, nepotism, conflicts of interest.

http://www.novatv.nl/index.cfm?ln=nl&fuseaction=videoaudio.details&reportage_id=5867&selectArchiveDay=5

saturday part 3, about st. maarten and bonaire.
obvious where that's about.

of course about the transferred and arrested police chief Derrick Holiday.
and the fact that there is no police chief on Bonaire after Jan van der Straten left.
and all the involvements of antilles justice minister David Dick.
he is in a very awkward situation now.

i don't know if there is a part 4 about aruba.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Jo-An on March 07, 2008, 10:16:59 AM
Ok guys, my working day is done, was alone in office all day so...

(http://img180.imageshack.us/img180/4223/iistiredwurktoohardhw0.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)


See ya later!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on March 07, 2008, 10:31:35 AM
Glenda Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2008 9:36 am   

Patrick also tells Poentje:

Joran's buddy/helper is currently hiding out with Joran in _______. 


~~~~~~~
She also says the halted broadcast will be shown on Sunday.

XxX wrote:
I will only believe it when I hear it from him on broadcast, there are to many rumours already in this case. You have no back up for so far, I do have a back up for my story. The truth will be in the middle at this point.
-----------------------
Glenda Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2008 10:09 am
Believe what you'd like. it will be aired on you Island on Sunday. ;)


~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I am getting dizzy :( THis is all so ridiculous. :(


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Destiny on March 07, 2008, 10:37:42 AM
More on the shoes--it never ends.

Note I believe it was Tromp saying the shoes were new which Joran also said and that he, Joran, wanted them back because of this.

Then later he was reported saying on Aruban Radio I think Chanel 90 that they were old so he didn't mind that they were lost, just forget about shoes, etc.

The SHOES are in the Twilight Zone as well!  The things that will make you go crazy if you think about them too long.

 ::MonkeyConfused::



Once in a while those shoes go walking through my head.

Is that the name of a song?
Pretty Darn Close! These Boots Were Made for Walking! Nancy Sinatra....That Makes Me wonder maybe He did where the cream colored boots that night and Daury had the KSwiss...either way I bet both pairs are missing.... ::MonkeyWink::

Hotping...my thinking exactly!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Peaches on March 07, 2008, 10:38:27 AM
Hi all- Here is something that may be important. Did Ale actually check the fishermans boat to see if any of Natalee's DNA could be found or blood. Its possible the boat that could transport a trap was sitting there all along. Next question did they keep the keys in the hut?


That begs the question, did ALE check anything? There are lots of boats not far away at the moorings in front of the hotels and rumor has it Koen Gottenbos had his boat parked there. There are very few put-in points where he lives on the north end of the island.

ALE and Karin Jannsen refused to interview him causing Asst. Prosecutor Amylin Flanigan to quit the investigation.

Just maybe, Koen's boat was used to transport Natalee/evidence from painted rocks area to fishing hut? Then fishing hut/trap/fishermen boat comes into play??



I like it. I think Steve Croes would be more adept and knowledgeable than Koen but would not rule either of them out. Just moving a trap may be no great shakes for either.

Croes maybe.  Koen doesn't look like he's lifted anything more than his fork to his mouth for a couple years now.  jmo


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: oceanexploration on March 07, 2008, 10:41:07 AM
From Kyle:

So, if I understand this right, it IS possible that the trap in the Dateline video MAY have been the trap stolen from the fish hut??

I think it's possible,but the trap that was reported stolen was a bit smaller.

As you already know, the trap dimensions you are familiar with came from Dr. Hodges.  To my knowledge, he did not speak with the fisherman who owned the hut which was broken into.  He spoke with the owner of the fishermans huts. 
Not that it is of any consequence, because the fisherman who leases the hut which was broken into 1) doesn't speak a lick of English 2) likely fishes mainly at night and 3) the trap likely didn't belong to the fisherman who's hut was broken into.  I walked by the huts about 5-6 times a day for 4 straight days during the time of day Hodges went to the Huts to learn as much as possible. I didn't encounter that fisherman once.  However, I spoke to the fisherman next to the one that was broken into who was often sitting out front of his hut.  He could only say hello in English. 

Regardless of the questionable applicability of the information, we decided to use the dimensions Dr. Hodges provided to serve as a baseline or minimum sonar target.

As for the trap being the one that was reportedly next to the fisherman's huts...I honestly don't know and can't prove that it is or isn't at this point.  I believe early on Dompig referred to the fish trap as being HUGE at one point.  A 5'x 4' trap hardly qualifies as huge. 

BTW, Good morning Monkeys


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Lala'sMom on March 07, 2008, 10:42:33 AM
Which source can provide the most money?  Book deals that may or may not happen or the PTB controlling everything with what seems to be unlimited resources? 

Morning Monkeys...just thinking out loud again.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 07, 2008, 10:53:05 AM
more of the same ole'
Today's Dutch News in English (they are always a day behind :roll: )

'Friend' knows who dumped Natalee
Friday 07 March 2008

Patrick van der Eem, the man who helped secretly record Joran van der Sloot confessing to being with Natalee Holloway when she died, has himself been secretly recorded by an Aruban tv company, Dutch media report on Friday.

After an interview on a local television station, Van der Eem carried on talking, thinking the cameras had been switched off.

But instead he was recorded saying that he knew who had dumped Natalee’s body at sea and that Van der Sloot had asked him for €2,000 to buy the man’s silence, the Telegraaf reports.

Van der Eem was also heard saying he had known Van der Sloot for several years. On Peter R de Vries’ tv programme, he claimed he befriended the Dutch student in a Nijmegen casino in 2007.

According to the Telegraaf, Van der Eem expects to become a millionaire because of his role in the Holloway affair. ‘And I will make sure that Joran and his entire family fall flat on their face. They had better emigrate to Africa,’ the paper quoted Van der Eem as saying.

Parts of the interview, which was recorded in Papiamento two weeks ago, have already been aired by TeleAruba. The interview was made following the news that Van der Eem has signed a US book deal.

News agency ANP reports that Van der Eem was furious after the partial broadcasts and has threatened interviewer Poentje Castro. Castro is seeking legal advice, ANP said.


http://www.dutchnews.nl/news/archives/2008/03/friend_knows_who_dumped_natale.php

Thank you Nut.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Blonde on March 07, 2008, 10:58:20 AM
Good Morning, I was reading about the possibility of the fisherman's boat being used. That was very intriguing and I had not considered it. So, kudos to who ever thought of that.

Here is a picture from ArubaGirl's website.

http://arubagirl.typepad.com/photos/aruba/dsc_0027.html

These are the boats shown. I also have a ton of my own beach photos and will look to see if I have any that show any boats in that area that look larger.

(http://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p149/Morgan2112_2006/FISHERMANHUTS1.jpg)

cropped and blown to 200%
(http://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p149/Morgan2112_2006/FISHERMANHUTS2.jpg)

This image is from Jan. 11 - 19, 2005, so it would be before Natalee went to Aruba and this is how I remember the boats.
(http://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p149/Morgan2112_2006/fishermanhutsboats2.jpg)

http://www.hammocktree.us/ms/Aruba05/Aruba05.html

Rob doesn't this boat look like this one that's from Aruba- Bay Video 24 body in the bag
video hmmm.

(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/Video%2024/24330sec.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Anna on March 07, 2008, 11:01:16 AM
Glenda Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2008 9:36 am   

Patrick also tells Poentje:

Joran's buddy/helper is currently hiding out with Joran in _______. 


~~~~~~~
She also says the halted broadcast will be shown on Sunday.

XxX wrote:
I will only believe it when I hear it from him on broadcast, there are to many rumours already in this case. You have no back up for so far, I do have a back up for my story. The truth will be in the middle at this point.
-----------------------
Glenda Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2008 10:09 am
Believe what you'd like. it will be aired on you Island on Sunday. ;)


~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I am getting dizzy :( THis is all so ridiculous. :(



Hiding out with Joran???

Patrick mentions Joran's relatives.  Has anyone ever wondered about Little Val, Koren's younger brother who was apparently awake and on the computer around three a.m. the night Natalee disappeared?

He's a pretty good sized kid and was not questioned at all until recently.

Huummm. . . .Again, just thinking out loud about things that would embarrass the Sloots and Joran's relatives and someone hiding out with Joran, etc.  Could Joran have called his brother for assistance when things went bad?

I have always wondered why no statement was taken from Val despite his logging onto the computer during the time in question on the night Natalee disappeared.

Well, we have looked everywhere else, just thinking out loud also.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Peaches on March 07, 2008, 11:03:20 AM
More on the shoes--it never ends.

Note I believe it was Tromp saying the shoes were new which Joran also said and that he, Joran, wanted them back because of this.

Then later he was reported saying on Aruban Radio I think Chanel 90 that they were old so he didn't mind that they were lost, just forget about shoes, etc.

The SHOES are in the Twilight Zone as well!  The things that will make you go crazy if you think about them too long.

 ::MonkeyConfused::



Once in a while those shoes go walking through my head.

Is that the name of a song?

No, but this is...

http://www.songofatlanta.com/media/clips/OurDayWillCome/02-TheseBootsAreMade.mp3


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Rob on March 07, 2008, 11:05:48 AM
Blonde

Hi, yes it does look like the exact same boat. Nice catch. You da Girl!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Blonde on March 07, 2008, 11:07:46 AM
Sander GOTTENBOS Statement

On your question if I had contact with Joran on May 29, 2005, I tell you the following;
I had telephone contact with Joran on May 29, 2005, this was around 11.00.

On your question about how the conversation went, I will tell you the following;
The conversation went that I asked him if he wanted to go out on my fathers boat.

He said that he could not go because he was going to play poker at the Holiday Inn. There is tournament each Sunday in aforementioned hotel and Joran participates almost each week in that tournament.

On your question what kind of boat my father has, I will explain to you the following:
It is a speedboat, of the make "Sea Pro".

On your question if Joran had been on our boat before, I will explain to you the following:
Joran has never been on our boat and has also never with our dangers. (?)
It should read:

"Joran has never been on our boat and also has never been boating with us".
On your question if I had spoken on May 29, 2005 with Joran by means of the computer, I will explain you the following:
I do not remember myself if I had spoken to him by means of the computer. If he had been online then it would be possible.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Rob on March 07, 2008, 11:13:51 AM
(http://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p149/Morgan2112_2006/fishermanhutsboats5.jpg)

OK, I took the original photo from January 05 and cropped it to blew it to 200 %, then I flipped it. Then I took Blonde's photo from Aru-Bay video #24 and selected all and blew that to 150% and combined both.

They are the same boat in my opinion.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Anna on March 07, 2008, 11:16:25 AM
Also recall Paulus shouting to the parents and folks from Alabama who came to his home on Monday night looking for Natalee.

"You have no jurisdiction, you have no jurisdiction!"

Was he more afraid of a SEARCH of his property than their questioning Joran?  And once again it is claimed that VAL was the one to awaken Paulus.  Once again we have the younger brother awake at a very odd hour.

Just saying. . . . .

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: klaasend on March 07, 2008, 11:19:12 AM
(http://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p149/Morgan2112_2006/fishermanhutsboats5.jpg)

OK, I took the original photo from January 05 and cropped it to blew it to 200 %, then I flipped it. Then I took Blonde's photo from Aru-Bay video #24 and selected all and blew that to 150% and combined both.

They are the same boat in my opinion.

If that boat is always there, wouldn't it make sense that it would be in the video?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: ala_gunslinger on March 07, 2008, 11:21:25 AM
(http://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p149/Morgan2112_2006/fishermanhutsboats5.jpg)

OK, I took the original photo from January 05 and cropped it to blew it to 200 %, then I flipped it. Then I took Blonde's photo from Aru-Bay video #24 and selected all and blew that to 150% and combined both.

They are the same boat in my opinion.

Man, you can almost make out the hull number!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Destiny on March 07, 2008, 11:21:52 AM
WARNING:  *Speculation Alert*...

Walking out to the *tip* of the limb here....this is my main cliff notes theory of how things went down...Natalee was the victim of a larger group than J2K...Natalee was taken to the Sloot house...this being the *last* place she was taken that evening....something *very bad* did happen to Natalee there...a lot of evidence in the Sloot house...including Natalee, when Beth and parties arrived at the Sloot house...the Sloots did not expect Beth to arrive...and especially not so soon....Beth denied access to Sloot house...Paulus the Perv sweating buckets...Joran and friends arrive not dressed for Casino....

Trap from 6 Robin photos *does* contain items pertaining to this case....Natalee is under the new concrete at Sloot house...as now that Beth and media is on Aruba...attemps to dispose of Natalee at dump...and a possible few other places...puts the perps in too much spotlight....Natalee returned to Sloot house...as it is the only place that Perps *know* cannot be investigated in full....Natalee moved to several locations on the Sloot Property....final resting place under concrete....the Sloots cannot leave the house now...too much speculation about the new concrete out there in the public ....BTW....when was the last time that the *whole* Sloot family has been away from the house...all at the same time...since all this shit has happened...

OK...so there....I'm teetering on the tip of the limb....but just had to get this off my chest...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 07, 2008, 11:24:38 AM
The words of Tim Miller, Dave Holloway, Beth Holloway, Tim Trahan and Louis Schafer imply that the contents of the cage which the crew of the Persistance located had no connection to Natalee Holloway and ... as the end of February there were more targets to search.

Janet

++++++++++++

Tim Miller
On the Record w/ Greta
February 27, 2008


Greta: Tim are they absolutely certain that this is not a piece of clothing belonging to Natalee Holloway?

MILLER: The report we got is the DNA that came back did not match Natalee's DNA and when we located that it looked like more than just a piece of cloth and I mean we, we felt as though we seen a skull in there. We got the Aruba authorities involved, they felt there was something in there, we dove on it and the thing is that's only 1 of over 170 targets out there we still have to investigate, so we've got a lot of work ahead of us.


Tim Miller/Tim Trahan
Dateline
February 22, 2008


(On the boat) Tim Miller: Divers coming up right now. I don't know it looked as promising today as it did last night or before.

Miller: Nothing?

Trahan: No.

Chris Hansen: That had to be a crushing blow.

Tim Miller: It was a crushing blow.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23301056/page/5/


Tim Miller/Dave Holloway/Beth Holloway
Dateline
February 22, 2008


Chris Hansen: How hard is it for you to dial their numbers and tell them that this in fact is not the break in the case we-- we hoped for?

Tim Miller: Probably one of the hardest calls I ever made. Probably one of the hardest … probably should have never made the first one. But everything looked right at the time.

Natalee’s father was at home in Mississippi when the call came.

Chris Hansen: What was it like for you to, once again, have a setback?

Dave Holloway: That's probably about the time that-- the chest pains intensified to an extreme. I mean, how many times can I take this?  

Beth Holloway: You know, it's a disappointment. But, you have to look at the magnitude and the sacrifices being made even to get to that point.  

Chris Hansen: You didn't know these folks before this happened. What do they represent to you now?
 
Dave Holloway: They represent heroes to me.
 
To be sure there was no relevant evidence, material from the trap was given to the FBI.
 
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23301056/page/5/


Postbus 1163, Oranjestad, Aruba
Havenstraat 2
Oranjestad
Aruba

To All media
From The Public Prosecutor’s Office
Date February 26, 2008

Pages 1


The Aruban Police requested the FBI Laboratory to process the cloth, because the Laboratory already had a sample of the exact match of the type of material of Natalee Holloway’s blouse. The FBI Laboratory received that material on the 22nd of January 2008.

On the 25th of February 2008, the Prosecutors’ Office received the official report from the FBI Laboratory that showed that the two materials were not a match.


Tim Miller
On the Record w/ Greta
February 27, 2008


Greta: Tim are they absolutely certain that this is not a piece of clothing belonging to Natalee Holloway?

Tim: The report we got is the DNA that came back did not match Natalee's DNA ...


Tim Trahan
ABC - Eyewitness News
February 28, 2008


"And we all feel, I'm speaking from everybody on the team, that she's in one of the targets we have not looked at yet," Tim Trahan of Underwater Expeditions said. "We can't stop. I go to sleep at night thinking we've located it, we just need to get to it."
http://abclocal.go.com/ktrk/story?section=news/local&id=5988951


Louis Schafer
ABC - Eyewitness News
February 28, 2008


"By Friday, we will have surveyed the entire 50-square mile off Aruba," Schafer said. "We have identified at least 60 of the targets. we have about 150 more targets to inspect."  

<snipped>

"So we have completely mapped the ocean floor, we know every object that's there, we know every object that could be a container holding her in the sea," he said.

http://abclocal.go.com/ktrk/story?section=news/local&id=5988951


Hans Mos
Dutch Television
February 28, 2008


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jxrrK53GOOA

Quote from: JE on February 28, 2008, 07:47:39 AM
He talks about the persistence search says they re looking for a needle in a haystack. He says its a difficult search assuming the needle and haystack even exist.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Rob on March 07, 2008, 11:24:38 AM
yes Klaas, it's always there unless it's being used to fish or possibly being used for body disposal.

Now, answer me this ->

Kyle says the trap missing was located behind the hut, and not inside. We heard that the hut was broken into and a knife was missing. But, what if that is where the keys to the boat were also kept. Breaking into the hut makes no sense unless there was something in the hut that was also needed.

Hodges says that the trap is much smaller and I made the point a few weeks ago that the trap found by the Persistence was too large to fit through the door. Kyle has cleared that up.

So, why break into the hut if the trap is readily available?

I suggest that could be where the keys were located.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Rob on March 07, 2008, 11:26:48 AM
(http://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p149/Morgan2112_2006/fishermanhutsboats5.jpg)

OK, I took the original photo from January 05 and cropped it to blew it to 200 %, then I flipped it. Then I took Blonde's photo from Aru-Bay video #24 and selected all and blew that to 150% and combined both.

They are the same boat in my opinion.

Man, you can almost make out the hull number!

Hi GS and good morning,

I believe that is the name of the boat and not a number. I have seen names on the side of those boats.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: katrien on March 07, 2008, 11:31:18 AM
The trolls show very often a little tape containing a couple with big sunglases telling Beth: "Beth you know, bla,bla,bla,bla.
The trolls tell the woman of this couple is an ex-friend of Natalee's mother.

Other stories say that this couple are detectives. ::MonkeyConfused::

One of the posters give a link to their? site. Fortunetellers? ::MonkeyHaHa::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: klaasend on March 07, 2008, 11:35:30 AM
The trolls show very often a little tape containing a couple with big sunglases telling Beth: "Beth you know, bla,bla,bla,bla.
The trolls tell the woman of this couple is an ex-friend of Natalee's mother.

Other stories say that this couple are detectives. ::MonkeyConfused::

One of the posters give a link to their? site. Fortunetellers? ::MonkeyHaHa::



Kelly & Young are psychics and they are FOS

http://www.guidedlight.com/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: ala_gunslinger on March 07, 2008, 11:38:38 AM
yes Klaas, it's always there unless it's being used to fish or possibly being used for body disposal.

Now, answer me this ->

Kyle says the trap missing was located behind the hut, and not inside. We heard that the hut was broken into and a knife was missing. But, what if that is where the keys to the boat were also kept. Breaking into the hut makes no sense unless there was something in the hut that was also needed.

Hodges says that the trap is much smaller and I made the point a few weeks ago that the trap found by the Persistence was too large to fit through the door. Kyle has cleared that up.

So, why break into the hut if the trap is readily available?

I suggest that could be where the keys were located.

Not all boats require keys.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Anna on March 07, 2008, 11:39:05 AM
Yes, it is true that the Aruban Minister of Justice puts his faith in psychics instead of his own OM and investigators.

But then what can one expect of someone caught with two or three sex slaves being held against their will?  Where are the charges for his doing that?

Perhaps that would be something to send to Hero Brinkman?  Anyone have detailed information on Rudy and the sex slaves?  Maybe we should send that to Mr. Brinkman.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: oceanexploration on March 07, 2008, 11:40:46 AM
As far as the beak-in at the huts:
As I see it there are two possibilities.  First, the fish huts were actually broken into and therefore likely related to the case. Alternatively, the door was kicked in by the Police during the search within a couple days of Natalee's dissapearance and a lovely new knife taken in the process. 
In either case, a trap, a sneaker, and a girl went missing. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: ala_gunslinger on March 07, 2008, 11:41:07 AM
(http://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p149/Morgan2112_2006/fishermanhutsboats5.jpg)

OK, I took the original photo from January 05 and cropped it to blew it to 200 %, then I flipped it. Then I took Blonde's photo from Aru-Bay video #24 and selected all and blew that to 150% and combined both.

They are the same boat in my opinion.

Man, you can almost make out the hull number!

Hi GS and good morning,

I believe that is the name of the boat and not a number. I have seen names on the side of those boats.

Name on the bow?  OK, I'll take your word for it!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Rob on March 07, 2008, 11:41:15 AM
Not all boats require keys.

True.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: KatzHome on March 07, 2008, 11:44:34 AM
Good morning, Bearly{{{hugs}}}  ::MonkeyWink::that makes Bear Hugs!

Wish you were still here to say hello to... and yeah ~ I'm slowly figuring out that things aren't as good as Eric told me...

::sigh:: well, as I've said before ~ there will be justice in the end, if not before...

And yeah ~ I'll pop in here in the mornings before Mass ~ that when you're usually around? just to say hi!



In short, No.  I am sure by now another monkey has set you straight.

Katz, I have been missing my other bear-pal in the cage.  Come back and visit.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Anna on March 07, 2008, 11:44:40 AM
The trolls show very often a little tape containing a couple with big sunglases telling Beth: "Beth you know, bla,bla,bla,bla.
The trolls tell the woman of this couple is an ex-friend of Natalee's mother.

Other stories say that this couple are detectives. ::MonkeyConfused::

One of the posters give a link to their? site. Fortunetellers? ::MonkeyHaHa::




I don't understand why the trolls continue with this line when we have Joran on tape confessing.  I suppose they just attribute his whole ten or so confessions as idle pratter and yet take the word of just anybody when it come to bashing Beth?

Maybe those in the sunglasses are the friends of Julia who were working for AHATA from the start.  One real friend of Beth's was contacted and she said she never said what those two psychics claim they have her on tape that no one has ever actually hears.

They lie. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Buckeye on March 07, 2008, 11:44:54 AM
Anna

I've always kept the book open about Val.  Would make mom and dad REALLY defend Joran.  He, atleast knows if he was on the computer and if it was him, why up so late, on a school night.

Poncho (teleruba) is also a spiritualist/yogo whatever.  Renee and the psychics probably sleep at his house.  Someone needs to tell him that if he wants the US to take him seriously, he needs to spell the name (first and last) of the VICTIM, accurately.  When he does that, I'll figure out his real name.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: KatzHome on March 07, 2008, 11:50:47 AM
Ok guys, my working day is done, was alone in office all day so...

(http://img180.imageshack.us/img180/4223/iistiredwurktoohardhw0.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)


See ya later!

Jo-An ~ you are so cool ~ thanks again and sweet dreams.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Destiny on March 07, 2008, 11:51:44 AM
O/T   LOL...just cracked open a furtune cooky from Chinese din-din from the other night...fortune reads:

*investige new possibilities with friends, now is the time*

What a hoot!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: ala_gunslinger on March 07, 2008, 11:55:12 AM
O/T   LOL...just cracked open a furtune cooky from Chinese din-din from the other night...fortune reads:

*investige new possibilities with friends, now is the time*

What a hoot!

Now THAT IS funny!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Destiny on March 07, 2008, 11:58:49 AM
O/T   LOL...just cracked open a furtune cooky from Chinese din-din from the other night...fortune reads:

*investige new possibilities with friends, now is the time*

What a hoot!

Now THAT IS funny!

Yep...'tis funny ;-)...just taped it to my monitor...LOL


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Anna on March 07, 2008, 12:00:40 PM
Meanwhile, just twenty miles off the coast of Aruba. . . .


If Venezuela halts imports of Colombian foods, "chaos and hunger could come" to western Venezuela, which depends on Colombian meat, eggs, milk, chickens and vegetables, Mendez said.


Trade Slows on Colombia-Venezuela Border

http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5giSrRJll06jW1Tk4Yhr8RAnTOj0gD8V8FL501


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: JE on March 07, 2008, 12:05:56 PM
about the break in at the huts:

 Rather quickly it emerged that he was The Fisherman who had discovered the break-in to the units on the morning of May 30, 2005. He related the following story.

He had been at this hut at 6 am that Monday morning May 30, 2005. Before long, he noticed that someone had broken into the first three of the four units in this particular group, from north to south, prying off the padlocks with something like a tire iron or a crowbar. He showed me the still-visible marks of the break-in on each unit. He described in detail the contents of each unit and the nature of the break-in.

Facing the first of the Fisherman's Huts from left to right (north to south): unit 1 contained a valuable stove, cooler and other equipment but nothing went missing; unit 2 had the lock pried off but was seemingly unopened because the door was stuck (and nothing was later reported missing); unit 3 also had its lock pried off with the only missing item being a brand new, large fishing knife (no rope was taken as had originally been reported, he said); finally unit 4 remained untouched. Clearly it seemed the perpetrator(s) had broken into the units in an orderly fashion until they found the specific item they were seeking—the knife. Indeed it struck the fisherman as odd that nothing else of value was taken.

Of the three Fisherman's Hut buildings, only one was accessible to break-in. The units in the closest nearby building were going mostly unused with sand covering the entrance doors up to a couple of feet. The outermost building was seemingly abandoned and virtually in the water.

http://forensicthoughtprints.com/aruba/default.html



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: katrien on March 07, 2008, 12:06:53 PM
The trolls show very often a little tape containing a couple with big sunglases telling Beth: "Beth you know, bla,bla,bla,bla.
The trolls tell the woman of this couple is an ex-friend of Natalee's mother.

Other stories say that this couple are detectives. ::MonkeyConfused::

One of the posters give a link to their? site. Fortunetellers? ::MonkeyHaHa::




I don't understand why the trolls continue with this line when we have Joran on tape confessing.  I suppose they just attribute his whole ten or so confessions as idle pratter and yet take the word of just anybody when it come to bashing Beth?

Maybe those in the sunglasses are the friends of Julia who were working for AHATA from the start.  One real friend of Beth's was contacted and she said she never said what those two psychics claim they have her on tape that no one has ever actually hears.

They lie. 

It's obvious they tell lies. They told Natalee has been in rehab before she went to Aruba.  Well, this is impossible because she is 18 years old and finished school successfully. Besides that, she was after her holiday going to live by herself. So why runaway?
She was 18 years old. There is no reason for an 18 years old girl to run away from home.
What they claims does not make any sense at all. ::MonkeyNoNo::

They have this information from an    ...................anonymous
............................taxidriver. He heard a familymember telling this.
 

The medical plane was very, very, very, very suspicious. ::MonkeyCool::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: ala_gunslinger on March 07, 2008, 12:10:28 PM
The trolls show very often a little tape containing a couple with big sunglases telling Beth: "Beth you know, bla,bla,bla,bla.
The trolls tell the woman of this couple is an ex-friend of Natalee's mother.

Other stories say that this couple are detectives. ::MonkeyConfused::

One of the posters give a link to their? site. Fortunetellers? ::MonkeyHaHa::




I don't understand why the trolls continue with this line when we have Joran on tape confessing.  I suppose they just attribute his whole ten or so confessions as idle pratter and yet take the word of just anybody when it come to bashing Beth?

Maybe those in the sunglasses are the friends of Julia who were working for AHATA from the start.  One real friend of Beth's was contacted and she said she never said what those two psychics claim they have her on tape that no one has ever actually hears.

They lie. 

It's obvious they tell lies. They told Natalee has been in rehab before she went to Aruba.  Well, this is impossible because she is 18 years old and finished school successfully. Besides that, she was after her holiday going to live by herself. So why runaway?
She was 18 years old. There is no reason for an 18 years old girl to run away from home.
What they claims does not make any sense at all. ::MonkeyNoNo::

They have this information from an    ...................anonymous
............................taxidriver. He heard a familymember telling this.
 

The medical plane was very, very, very, very suspicious. ::MonkeyCool::



I respect your opinion, however, I could see where the med jet was a well planned precaution.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: caesu on March 07, 2008, 12:20:38 PM
http://www.telegraaf.nl/binnenland/3498985/_Aruba_wil_gesprek_Van_der_Eem__.html

aruban OM wants the tapes from Poentje to determine what Patrick exactly said and if it is relevant to the case.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: JE on March 07, 2008, 12:21:10 PM
http://www.telegraaf.nl/binnenland/3498985/_Aruba_wil_gesprek_Van_der_Eem__.html

OM requested copy of the Poentje tape They want to investigate if there is any information relevant to the case and if so they will add the video to the case files


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: JE on March 07, 2008, 12:21:51 PM
http://www.telegraaf.nl/binnenland/3498985/_Aruba_wil_gesprek_Van_der_Eem__.html

aruban OM wants the tapes from Poentje to determine what Patrick exactly said and if it is relevant to the case.

LOL nearly at the same time ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Anna on March 07, 2008, 12:22:09 PM
Gunslinger, the psycho psychics claim Natalee was in fact removed from the island on the Medjet or that Beth had it there to sneak her away without telling anyone she was found.  Hard to keep up with their lies but some of them involve the MedJet.

I agree with you that it was an excellent precaution had they been able to find Natalee alive but that never happened unlike the psychos stories.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Rob on March 07, 2008, 12:22:27 PM
http://www.telegraaf.nl/binnenland/3498985/_Aruba_wil_gesprek_Van_der_Eem__.html

aruban OM wants the tapes from Poentje to determine what Patrick exactly said and if it is relevant to the case.

Thanks caesu...so Mos is taking this seriously. I wonder what Mos will claim was said or not said. Interesting none the less.

As I suspected, Patrick must not have told Mos all he knows in his declaration.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Rob on March 07, 2008, 12:26:24 PM
Gunslinger, the psycho psychics claim Natalee was in fact removed from the island on the Medjet or that Beth had it there to sneak her away without telling anyone she was found.  Hard to keep up with their lies but some of them involve the MedJet.

I agree with you that it was an excellent precaution had they been able to find Natalee alive but that never happened unlike the psychos stories.

.

right Anna and GS, what were they supposed to do? The nutballs on Aruba are telling them that Natalee is in a crack house and what are they supposed to do?

As Beth related, the Med-Jet cost about $25,100 in contrast to insurance that would have paid that for around 100 dollars if I remember correctly.

I guess saying that your daughter is in a crack house and being sexually abused is a better slogan for the island than she has been raped and murdered by one of our island pimps.

The NERVE!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: caesu on March 07, 2008, 12:30:50 PM
http://www.revu.nl/10871.Advocaat_reageert_op_uitspraken_Van_der_Eem

"Joran's dutch lawyer, Bert de Rooij, is interested in what Patrick had to say.

De Rooij could imagine that the OM in Aruba is not happy with all this.
it is not bad for Joran."

note: source of this is Revu (Stan de Jong)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Anna on March 07, 2008, 12:31:16 PM
But Aruba has allowed the "I am a Tremendous Liar" Defense for Joran so all anyone ever has to say now is that they lie a lot and anything they say no longer counts!!!

Also, one may now say somebody was deceased and dump them in the drink all on their own and only be expected to be charges with some sort of misdemeanor mishandling of a corpse for all citizens have the legal ability to declare others as dead.

If these things apply to Joran, they apply to all, do they not? 

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Destiny on March 07, 2008, 12:32:48 PM
http://www.telegraaf.nl/binnenland/3498985/_Aruba_wil_gesprek_Van_der_Eem__.html

aruban OM wants the tapes from Poentje to determine what Patrick exactly said and if it is relevant to the case.

Thanks caesu...so Mos is taking this seriously. I wonder what Mos will claim was said or not said. Interesting none the less.

As I suspected, Patrick must not have told Mos all he knows in his declaration.

Or...they need to fugure out what needs to be put in the Aruba *lie blender* to turn any new evidence away from the perps...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: ala_gunslinger on March 07, 2008, 12:35:38 PM
Gunslinger, the psycho psychics claim Natalee was in fact removed from the island on the Medjet or that Beth had it there to sneak her away without telling anyone she was found.  Hard to keep up with their lies but some of them involve the MedJet.

I agree with you that it was an excellent precaution had they been able to find Natalee alive but that never happened unlike the psychos stories.

.

Just one of the many mis-information plants.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Rob on March 07, 2008, 12:37:17 PM
Des - lie blender - That's funny!!! ::MonkeyHaHa::

Throw in a heaping helping of Sloot.

Stir in some Kalpuke.

Twist in a little bit of cruddy Croes.

Hit purée - repeatedly!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 07, 2008, 12:37:32 PM
http://www.telegraaf.nl/binnenland/3498985/_Aruba_wil_gesprek_Van_der_Eem__.html

aruban OM wants the tapes from Poentje to determine what Patrick exactly said and if it is relevant to the case.

LOL nearly at the same time ::MonkeyWink::


Of course Mos wants the tape! He is going to determine that it's "evidence", thus, forbidding it to be released to anyone. It's all about damage control related to the first undercover taping of Joran. This tape is now the number one priority for Mos.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: billb's daughter on March 07, 2008, 12:39:32 PM
As far as the beak-in at the huts:
As I see it there are two possibilities.  First, the fish huts were actually broken into and therefore likely related to the case. Alternatively, the door was kicked in by the Police during the search within a couple days of Natalee's dissapearance and a lovely new knife taken in the process. 
In either case, a trap, a sneaker, and a girl went missing. 
My postings from last night fwiw:


Posts: 28


View Profile
   
   
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
« Reply #627 on: March 06, 2008, 10:45:01 PM »
   Reply with quoteQuote
Quote from: Dayhiker on March 06, 2008, 10:31:39 PM
Quote from: Bladerunner on March 06, 2008, 10:30:03 PM
Quote from: Dayhiker on March 06, 2008, 10:26:30 PM
Quote from: billb on March 06, 2008, 10:20:17 PM

Burying evidence is also plausible, but I think they were in panic mode when "something bad happened" They buried Natalee in haste, then thought of evidence. The trap was there (and a fishing boat), maybe called for help (koen, K2, SC??) to handle trap. I have heard alot about possible Koen and his boat used for disposal, and that may have been the case. But if Koen's boat was too small, they more than likely use the fishing boat moored, since it was probably better suited to handle the trap. They used the boat to move the trap, then placed it back at its mooring. The purpose of using the trap for the evidence is to distance the evidence from the body. Could have been Paulus idea to do that initially, with Paulus then planning to move her body later, with or without letting the others know of his plan.


I'm thinking Steve Croes. In fact he could have used that party boat to drag the trap out that short a distance if his little boat couldn't.

How does the duffle bag fit into this timeline with the cage?


It definitely pushes it back a day.
True, but what if the trap was put out to sea in 90' depth the first night? Then the duffel bag contains evidence (Bloody shoes/clothes of perps, Natalee's clothes, etc) discovered by Paulus at the VDslootbag home. A scuba diver could easily take the bag/contents out and place in trap. JVDS younger brother is a scuba diver (I think I read this).....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Magnolia on March 07, 2008, 12:40:02 PM

And even I know how to hot wire a boat. ::MonkeyTongue::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 07, 2008, 12:41:36 PM
Who wants to take the bet that if Patrick witheld information from Mos during his declaration and now something shows up on the tape showing this, that Mos is going to charge him with a crime.

Watch out, it could happen!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Destiny on March 07, 2008, 12:42:54 PM
Des - lie blender - That's funny!!! ::MonkeyHaHa::

Throw in a heaping helping of Sloot.

Stir in some Kalpuke.

Twist in a little bit of cruddy Croes.

Hit purée - repeatedly!
::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: katrien on March 07, 2008, 12:44:23 PM
[I respect your opinion, however, I could see where the med jet was a well planned precaution.

Yes of course, it was. What if Natalee was found and needed specialistic care?


By the plane Natalee could have been taken to the right place as soon as possible.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Buckeye on March 07, 2008, 12:47:24 PM
The trolls show very often a little tape containing a couple with big sunglases telling Beth: "Beth you know, bla,bla,bla,bla.
The trolls tell the woman of this couple is an ex-friend of Natalee's mother.

Other stories say that this couple are detectives. ::MonkeyConfused::

One of the posters give a link to their? site. Fortunetellers? ::MonkeyHaHa::




I don't understand why the trolls continue with this line when we have Joran on tape confessing.  I suppose they just attribute his whole ten or so confessions as idle pratter and yet take the word of just anybody when it come to bashing Beth?

Maybe those in the sunglasses are the friends of Julia who were working for AHATA from the start.  One real friend of Beth's was contacted and she said she never said what those two psychics claim they have her on tape that no one has ever actually hears.

They lie. 

It's obvious they tell lies. They told Natalee has been in rehab before she went to Aruba.  Well, this is impossible because she is 18 years old and finished school successfully. Besides that, she was after her holiday going to live by herself. So why runaway?
She was 18 years old. There is no reason for an 18 years old girl to run away from home.
What they claims does not make any sense at all. ::MonkeyNoNo::

They have this information from an    ...................anonymous
............................taxidriver. He heard a familymember telling this.
 

The medical plane was very, very, very, very suspicious. ::MonkeyCool::



The medjet (which arrived after the private plane arrival) and McWane jet were broadcast early on. Fox news October 2005 has Beth talking about it.  It was no secret. How would Aruba not know about a plane landing?   The $37,000 medjet cost was even published. There is no revealing secret there. The medjet was sent because the family was told Natalee was in a choller house and there was the belief that she had left with a local drug dealer (which would explain the money to drink and gamble when one has no job). Americans are a bit funny about healthcare.  Had this been my daughter, I would have called every flight physician I knew to get her back to the states ASAP. She couldn't have been doing drugs for days.  She was sitting fine in the casino video (with a bottle of water in front of her) and dancing at C&Cs.  Her friends never saw her drugged, drunk, yes, not drugged.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Buckeye on March 07, 2008, 12:49:59 PM
about the break in at the huts:

 Rather quickly it emerged that he was The Fisherman who had discovered the break-in to the units on the morning of May 30, 2005. He related the following story.

He had been at this hut at 6 am that Monday morning May 30, 2005. Before long, he noticed that someone had broken into the first three of the four units in this particular group, from north to south, prying off the padlocks with something like a tire iron or a crowbar. He showed me the still-visible marks of the break-in on each unit. He described in detail the contents of each unit and the nature of the break-in.

Facing the first of the Fisherman's Huts from left to right (north to south): unit 1 contained a valuable stove, cooler and other equipment but nothing went missing; unit 2 had the lock pried off but was seemingly unopened because the door was stuck (and nothing was later reported missing); unit 3 also had its lock pried off with the only missing item being a brand new, large fishing knife (no rope was taken as had originally been reported, he said); finally unit 4 remained untouched. Clearly it seemed the perpetrator(s) had broken into the units in an orderly fashion until they found the specific item they were seeking—the knife. Indeed it struck the fisherman as odd that nothing else of value was taken.

Of the three Fisherman's Hut buildings, only one was accessible to break-in. The units in the closest nearby building were going mostly unused with sand covering the entrance doors up to a couple of feet. The outermost building was seemingly abandoned and virtually in the water.

http://forensicthoughtprints.com/aruba/default.html



So when did the fishermen, that were fishing that night, actually leave...if this owner saw this at 6am??  hmmmmm


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Buckeye on March 07, 2008, 12:56:12 PM
Who wants to take the bet that if Patrick witheld information from Mos during his declaration and now something shows up on the tape showing this, that Mos is going to charge him with a crime.

Watch out, it could happen!

Maybe Mos didn't ask Patrick any questions.  The Joran tape speaks for itself.  Mos and Peter R. both said that Daury was not the name mentioned...I think.  If Patrick said Joran told him something in private, then it becomes hearsay, anyhow.  There are plenty of Joran's own words to investigate.  It doesn't matter what Patrick thinks...unless of course he or a friend can get another perp on tape...or SMS...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Destiny on March 07, 2008, 12:58:18 PM
As OE said...he *never* said there were no *human* remains in the trap...what I would like to know is...what chollor /beach bum has been missing since that night...someone who might have seen/helped with *some thing bad*...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: katrien on March 07, 2008, 01:01:38 PM
Every sensible thinking person can tell Natalee was not a drugs user.

She obviously drank on her holiday. Why not?
For the first time on Aruba with your schoolfriends.

Finished school successfully. Five days to Aruba. Partytime.   ::MonkeyCool::
I do not believe she was taken drugs. She did not have time to use drugs. Besides that, she does not look like a drugs user. ::MonkeyWink::

Before I read the book of Beth I was thinking that the plane was there to bring Natalee, in case she was found badly hurt, to a specialistic hospital.

Well, there was another reason.

So what's the problem?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Anna on March 07, 2008, 01:03:21 PM
They have some strange ideas in Aruba.  Seem to think if someone had the misfortune to be related to Hitler, it should mean they no longer are deserving of justice?  Also if a person has been in rehab which Natalee NEVER WAS that the local pimps might be entitled to make them disappear?

You can't get a large payout from an insurance company without law enforcement knowing all about it.  It is impossible in this country.

And yet they persist with the lies, often inventing and adding new ones as though if they come up with just the right ones, we will all turn on Natalee and Beth and no longer support them???

We are a nation of laws and not men.   It is the concept of equal justice and justice for all and all the rest that keeps us here.  We don't care what lies they tell or come up with.  Those are totally futile as we believe in justice for all without regard to those things they think will turn us against Natalee's memory and her mother. 
Not gonna happen.  Just makes them look worse and worse and worse.

Never have I in my entire life heard of cops pretending they couldn't do their jobs because of the media or something the victim's mother said or did.  They would be laughed off the force in this country for making such claims.

We don't buy the concept that some people are deserving of justice and others are not so they might as well stop with the lies and do the right thing.

JMO



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on March 07, 2008, 01:06:34 PM
O/T  Klaas.......can you mark the thread please?

Natalie Nicole Powell, 22 has been found safe in South Carolina


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: katrien on March 07, 2008, 01:06:35 PM
How would Aruba not know about a plane landing?   

May be Beth did not ask permission.
May she was afraid Aruba would not give permisson, so she did not ask. ::MonkeyCool::

Very well possible. ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: katrien on March 07, 2008, 01:07:53 PM
First land, then ask permission. ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Kiwi on March 07, 2008, 01:13:12 PM
Good afternoon all- Klaasend is it possible to pass that idea along to the family about the keys to the fishermans boat being inside one of the huts. Then returned back to its mooring minus the trap.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 07, 2008, 01:13:14 PM
Here is a good photo showing the simple padlock on the door at the huts:

It is from this site, apparently 2003:

http://www.island-temptations.com/old/summer03/story4/

I believe the green doors are on the back of the huts, but someone can confirm this.

(http://i27.tinypic.com/20zah6r.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: klaasend on March 07, 2008, 01:15:07 PM
Good afternoon all- Klaasend is it possible to pass that idea along to the family about the keys to the fishermans boat being inside one of the huts. Then returned back to its mooring minus the trap.

Sure, we can do that  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Anna on March 07, 2008, 01:17:33 PM
First land, then ask permission. ::MonkeyHaHa::


Those Medically Equipped planes are VERY expensive.  No one is going to risk one being fired on by hostile authorities or confiscated or seized for not having permission to land. 

I am quite certain the apporpriate flight plans were in order including permission to land.  Not many physicians are willing to risk their lives as well as the pilot to make a landing without permission.  For one thing, I don't think the company that owned the plane would allow it to do so.  Could be confiscated by the offended government, etc.

No, it had full permission to land as it always has when making a flight to retrieve a patient.

These flights act fully within the law and have no reason to do otherwise.  It wasn't a daring rescue mission by the military or special forces but a routine MedFlight being used as it normally and lawfully is used.
.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Buckeye on March 07, 2008, 01:17:37 PM
World Journier..medjet

On October 31, 2005 BETH HOLLOWAY-TWITTY stated she will be in ARUBA for 3 days. BETH HOLLOWAY-TWITTY stated to FOX News that during the first weeks after NATALEE vanished in ARUBA, they had arranged for and rented a plane to be waiting in ARUBA for 2 days to pick up NATALEE and take her off ARUBA after, apparently, someone had told NATALEE’s Loved Ones that NATALEE was alive and in an ARUBA crack house. NATALEE was not in the crack house, so the plane the family had rented returned back to the UNITED STATES, and the plane rental had cost NATALEE‘s Loved Ones $37,000. BETH stated, “I would hope that Deputy Dompig realizes that we’re not flying family, friends and searchers in and out on brooms to Aruba. You know, we pay air fares. We pay hotel bills. We pay the exorbitant attorney fees, private Investigators. You know, one sample of a bill was $37,000 to “Medjet” because we had the jet sitting on the tarmac for two days because that’s when we thought we were pulling Natalee out alive of one of their crack houses, being held by a crack addict against her will. So you know, there have been some expenses that we have incurred during this investigation.”

On November 1, 2006 “Blogs For Natalee” reported about the October 28, 2006 meeting:

<QUOTE>

Was a medjet ever in Aruba and if so what were the reasons for it being there? They did have a medjet available due to the possibility that Natalee was being held in a crack house and would not know her condition when they found her.

Personal note: the family was told over and over by the ALE to check the crackhouses in the first few days of the investigation.


http://members.aol.com/WorldJOURNIER/NATALEE/2005_06_01_thru_june08.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: klaasend on March 07, 2008, 01:19:17 PM
Running to a couple of stores, be back in a bit   ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Buckeye on March 07, 2008, 01:20:40 PM
How would Aruba not know about a plane landing?   

May be Beth did not ask permission.
May she was afraid Aruba would not give permisson, so she did not ask. ::MonkeyCool::

Very well possible. ::MonkeyWink::

There is radar....and I seriously do not think that anyone lands a plane without the control tower knowing they are coming in.  Commercial planes arrive also.  The plane would be the one with "permission".  A plane can't sneak anywhere.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on March 07, 2008, 01:23:48 PM
WARNING:  *Speculation Alert*...

Walking out to the *tip* of the limb here....this is my main cliff notes theory of how things went down...Natalee was the victim of a larger group than J2K...Natalee was taken to the Sloot house...this being the *last* place she was taken that evening....something *very bad* did happen to Natalee there...a lot of evidence in the Sloot house...including Natalee, when Beth and parties arrived at the Sloot house...the Sloots did not expect Beth to arrive...and especially not so soon....Beth denied access to Sloot house...Paulus the Perv sweating buckets...Joran and friends arrive not dressed for Casino....

Trap from 6 Robin photos *does* contain items pertaining to this case....Natalee is under the new concrete at Sloot house...as now that Beth and media is on Aruba...attemps to dispose of Natalee at dump...and a possible few other places...puts the perps in too much spotlight....Natalee returned to Sloot house...as it is the only place that Perps *know* cannot be investigated in full....Natalee moved to several locations on the Sloot Property....final resting place under concrete....the Sloots cannot leave the house now...too much speculation about the new concrete out there in the public ....BTW....when was the last time that the *whole* Sloot family has been away from the house...all at the same time...since all this shit has happened...

OK...so there....I'm teetering on the tip of the limb....but just had to get this off my chest...
[/quote

Sounds plausible.If they have nothing to hide they should be begging for them to search the house,dig up the new concrete,etc,etc...The VDS family.What a bunch of Hooligans...

Keepthefaith


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Anna on March 07, 2008, 01:24:47 PM
Bladerunner, It says right beside that photo on the link:

Shot on location at Charlie's Bar in Savaneta,
the mangroves of Savaneta, Fisherman's Huts,
and poolside at Wacamaya Residence.
(Left) Heidi Munzenhoffer modeling her own design
 

 

And in the article:

Heidi custom designs and tailors her suits for each individual client, but has plans to develop and market her creations to the general public soon. The designer also runs couture shop Creations Aimee with her mother, Rosa. Heidi is currently working on a swimsuit calendar for 2004, combining both her talents as a designer and beauty as a model.

----------

So Heidi is a Munzenhoffer as is Angela?  Could the Rosa that is her mother be Rosalie Klein who was previously also a Munzenhoffer and the big connection between these trolls revealed at last?

Does anyone know if scubajap and Angela Munzenhoffer are sisters by any chance?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 07, 2008, 01:27:32 PM
Bladerunner, It says right beside that photo on the link:

Shot on location at Charlie's Bar in Savaneta,
the mangroves of Savaneta, Fisherman's Huts,
and poolside at Wacamaya Residence.
(Left) Heidi Munzenhoffer modeling her own design
 

 

And in the article:

Heidi custom designs and tailors her suits for each individual client, but has plans to develop and market her creations to the general public soon. The designer also runs couture shop Creations Aimee with her mother, Rosa. Heidi is currently working on a swimsuit calendar for 2004, combining both her talents as a designer and beauty as a model.

----------

So Heidi is a Munzenhoffer as is Angela?  Could the Rosa that is her mother be Rosalie Klein who was previously also a Munzenhoffer and the big connection between these trolls revealed at last?

Does anyone know if scubajap and Angela Munzenhoffer are sisters by any chance?

I can't follow all that but I'm sure you veteran monkeys will make the connections--if there are any!!    ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Rob on March 07, 2008, 01:32:34 PM
Here is a good photo showing the simple padlock on the door at the huts:

It is from this site, apparently 2003:

http://www.island-temptations.com/old/summer03/story4/

I believe the green doors are on the back of the huts, but someone can confirm this.

(http://i27.tinypic.com/20zah6r.jpg)


and there is this caption ~ (Left) Heidi Munzenhoffer modeling her own design


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: katrien on March 07, 2008, 01:33:50 PM
No, it had full permission to land as it always has when making a flight to retrieve a patient.

These flights act fully within the law and have no reason to do otherwise.  It wasn't a daring rescue mission by the military or special forces but a routine MedFlight being used as it normally and lawfully is used.
.

So, this is another gossip?
Howmany gossips do the trolls invent? Today they started tot alk about the microphones in the car.

It is all about misinformation. They try to take the attention away to what really is important.
Would they do that if there was no reason?

Johan555 was talking about the sewerage on Aruba. ::MonkeyCool::




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: JE on March 07, 2008, 01:34:39 PM
Here is a good photo showing the simple padlock on the door at the huts:

It is from this site, apparently 2003:

http://www.island-temptations.com/old/summer03/story4/

I believe the green doors are on the back of the huts, but someone can confirm this.

(http://i27.tinypic.com/20zah6r.jpg)


blade look here ther's lots of pictures of the huts (click on em for slide show)
http://forensicthoughtprints.com/aruba/default.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: vms on March 07, 2008, 01:35:06 PM
Anna,

Rosalie formerly a Munzenhoffer? Wasn't it Gesterkamp or did I miss something?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Buckeye on March 07, 2008, 01:35:57 PM
Bladerunner, It says right beside that photo on the link:

Shot on location at Charlie's Bar in Savaneta,
the mangroves of Savaneta, Fisherman's Huts,
and poolside at Wacamaya Residence.
(Left) Heidi Munzenhoffer modeling her own design
 

 

And in the article:

Heidi custom designs and tailors her suits for each individual client, but has plans to develop and market her creations to the general public soon. The designer also runs couture shop Creations Aimee with her mother, Rosa. Heidi is currently working on a swimsuit calendar for 2004, combining both her talents as a designer and beauty as a model.

----------

So Heidi is a Munzenhoffer as is Angela?  Could the Rosa that is her mother be Rosalie Klein who was previously also a Munzenhoffer and the big connection between these trolls revealed at last?

Does anyone know if scubajap and Angela Munzenhoffer are sisters by any chance?

There was some picture when Rosalie's sister came to island for birthday and I think a picture with ?godfather? Berndina ?  I'm trying to remember...but I think there was some connection...or picture in a group setting..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Buckeye on March 07, 2008, 01:38:10 PM
Anna,

Rosalie formerly a Munzenhoffer? Wasn't it Gesterkamp or did I miss something?

Now, I think that's correct...but maybe her married (?X) name and Klein her maiden name?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Rob on March 07, 2008, 01:38:56 PM
here's a boat from the though print site.

Machibo - name on the side. I enlarged it and it may not be clear.

(http://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p149/Morgan2112_2006/Machibo2.png)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Flipper/Donnie29 on March 07, 2008, 01:40:04 PM
No, it had full permission to land as it always has when making a flight to retrieve a patient.

These flights act fully within the law and have no reason to do otherwise.  It wasn't a daring rescue mission by the military or special forces but a routine MedFlight being used as it normally and lawfully is used.
.

So, this is another gossip?
Howmany gossips do the trolls invent? Today they started tot alk about the microphones in the car.

It is all about misinformation. They try to take the attention away to what really is important.
Would they do that if there was no reason?

Johan555 was talking about the sewerage on Aruba. ::MonkeyCool::




Yeah thats right Katrien.. they only do that to get the focus of of the big picture.. thats the only thing there doing.. So obviously they know alot more, and are just being actively spreading lies etc etc.. It really makes me irritated..

Im also curious about why the Aruban OM, canceled the show in being aired.. What was on it that was so important..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Anna on March 07, 2008, 01:40:05 PM
Latrien,

The trolls started lying almost immeidately from the time Beth arrived.  One of them made up a bogus missing poster trying to make it appear Beth only thought Natalee had run away when nothing could have been further from the truth.  By two weeks, AHATA had formed their Strategic Command Force to start churning out the lies to "counter" what they thought was sure to be a public relations disaster for the island.

They have been at this for almost three long years.  It just makes us realize that Beth does need protection and support more because of this.

The government and tourism are intertwined with the government owning the actual beaches and many of the hotel buildings that they lease to the big hotel operators.  Huge conflict of interest when the government has an interest in protecting tourism and puts that over justice and enforcing the laws.

Also the government recently built a new huge cruise ship dock and now cruise ship arrival declines by 40 percent meaning they are in financial trouble on many of these ventures, etc. and so they work to subvert justice in order to protect tourism.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Anna on March 07, 2008, 01:41:10 PM
Latrien,

The trolls started lying almost immeidately from the time Beth arrived.  One of them made up a bogus missing poster trying to make it appear Beth only thought Natalee had run away when nothing could have been further from the truth.  By two weeks, AHATA had formed their Strategic Command Force to start churning out the lies to "counter" what they thought was sure to be a public relations disaster for the island.

They have been at this for almost three long years.  It just makes us realize that Beth does need protection and support more because of this.

The government and tourism are intertwined with the government owning the actual beaches and many of the hotel buildings that they lease to the big hotel operators.  Huge conflict of interest when the government has an interest in protecting tourism and puts that over justice and enforcing the laws.

Also the government recently built a new huge cruise ship dock and now cruise ship arrival declines by 40 percent meaning they are in financial trouble on many of these ventures, etc. and so they work to subvert justice in order to protect tourism.

.

Edit to correct spelling of name Katrien, sorry.  No edit button  (grumble, grumble).


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: katrien on March 07, 2008, 01:45:19 PM

A plane can't sneak anywhere. ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Anna on March 07, 2008, 01:48:28 PM
Anna,

Rosalie formerly a Munzenhoffer? Wasn't it Gesterkamp or did I miss something?

Now, I think that's correct...but maybe her married (?X) name and Klein her maiden name?

I thought Klein was her married name now and she was previously married to that Jethro Gesterkamp guy, the one with the tour boat Octupus?  But I am wondering if Munzenhofer is not the maiden name of both of them as scubajap was known to have the parents with the Bucaneer restaurant.  Isn't that the same parents as Angela?

But I am pretty sure Gesterkamp was one of the husbands and not her maiden name.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Lala'sMom on March 07, 2008, 01:53:36 PM
Isn't that Ronchi de Cuba person the big guy/girl in those Hiram photos?  This is the designer? Now, that connects some dots...for me.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: vms on March 07, 2008, 01:53:59 PM
Anna,

Rosalie formerly a Munzenhoffer? Wasn't it Gesterkamp or did I miss something?

Now, I think that's correct...but maybe her married (?X) name and Klein her maiden name?

I thought Klein was her married name now and she was previously married to that Jethro Gesterkamp guy, the one with the tour boat Octupus?  But I am wondering if Munzenhofer is not the maiden name of both of them as scubajap was known to have the parents with the Bucaneer restaurant.  Isn't that the same parents as Angela?

But I am pretty sure Gesterkamp was one of the husbands and not her maiden name.



Yes, Gesterkamp was a husband.
Munzenhoffer is Angela's married name. I don't know about scuba being connected to the Buccaneer also.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Hotshot on March 07, 2008, 01:54:54 PM
Here is a good photo showing the simple padlock on the door at the huts:

It is from this site, apparently 2003:

http://www.island-temptations.com/old/summer03/story4/

I believe the green doors are on the back of the huts, but someone can confirm this.

(http://i27.tinypic.com/20zah6r.jpg)

There are no doors on the back of the huts.  I can vouch for that.  All doors on the front.   http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h294/gummy_2006/hutcollage.jpg   Kyle has taken some of the same pictures I took while over there.  The new wood door, is the hut that was broken into.  


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Buckeye on March 07, 2008, 01:56:30 PM
Anna,

Rosalie formerly a Munzenhoffer? Wasn't it Gesterkamp or did I miss something?

Now, I think that's correct...but maybe her married (?X) name and Klein her maiden name?

I thought Klein was her married name now and she was previously married to that Jethro Gesterkamp guy, the one with the tour boat Octupus?  But I am wondering if Munzenhofer is not the maiden name of both of them as scubajap was known to have the parents with the Bucaneer restaurant.  Isn't that the same parents as Angela?

But I am pretty sure Gesterkamp was one of the husbands and not her maiden name.



I just can't remember it all.... ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Rob on March 07, 2008, 02:00:55 PM
I'd like one mystery cleared up - Is Ronchi de Cuba a guy or a girl?

I literally have no idea.  ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Kiwi on March 07, 2008, 02:03:21 PM
Rob I may have started the key-hut break-in line last night. The thought came up with the fishermans recount of the break-in at the huts but that its a good thing that the boat was still there. Of course the idea could have been presented years ago or hours prior. Sometimes simple and quick works better in the time line.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Rob on March 07, 2008, 02:05:36 PM
Rob I may have started the key-hut break-in line last night. The thought came up with the fishermans recount of the break-in at the huts but that its a good thing that the boat was still there. Of course the idea could have been presented years ago or hours prior. Sometimes simple and quick works better in the time line.

I think you are right Kiwi, it was you...and it's good thinking. I had not thought of it before. So, again, kudos to you.

I don't remember anyone else talking about it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: private eye on March 07, 2008, 02:07:40 PM
Yes, it is true that the Aruban Minister of Justice puts his faith in psychics instead of his own OM and investigators.

But then what can one expect of someone caught with two or three sex slaves being held against their will?  Where are the charges for his doing that?

Perhaps that would be something to send to Hero Brinkman?  Anyone have detailed information on Rudy and the sex slaves?  Maybe we should send that to Mr. Brinkman.

.

Rudy knows the quality of his staff better than we do:)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Anna on March 07, 2008, 02:08:00 PM
O/T

THE NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE IN BIRMINGHAM HAS ISSUED A HEAVY
SNOW WARNING...WHICH IS IN EFFECT FROM 6 PM THIS EVENING TO 10 AM
CST SATURDAY. THE WINTER STORM WATCH IS NO LONGER IN EFFECT.

http://www.srh.noaa.gov/bmx/cgi-bin/wxs1.php?sid=BMX&pil=WSW&version=0&max=13



It does say the expected snowfall to be about 2.5 inches only but subject to change. 


Yikes!    ::MonkeyShocked::   This sort of information causes us southern monkeys to behave very strangely doing things like stocking up on groceries and driving erratically.

Must immediately go do same!   ::MonkeyHaHa::




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Buckeye on March 07, 2008, 02:09:33 PM
Rob I may have started the key-hut break-in line last night. The thought came up with the fishermans recount of the break-in at the huts but that its a good thing that the boat was still there. Of course the idea could have been presented years ago or hours prior. Sometimes simple and quick works better in the time line.

I think you are right Kiwi, it was you...and it's good thinking. I had not thought of it before. So, again, kudos to you.

I don't remember anyone else talking about it.

I don't remember any talk about the boat, until Kyle mentioned it, in the same post as the comment about the trap.  Kyle is probably not going to like being the start of speculation...hee, hee, hee...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Buckeye on March 07, 2008, 02:11:37 PM
O/T

THE NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE IN BIRMINGHAM HAS ISSUED A HEAVY
SNOW WARNING...WHICH IS IN EFFECT FROM 6 PM THIS EVENING TO 10 AM
CST SATURDAY. THE WINTER STORM WATCH IS NO LONGER IN EFFECT.

http://www.srh.noaa.gov/bmx/cgi-bin/wxs1.php?sid=BMX&pil=WSW&version=0&max=13



It does say the expected snowfall to be about 2.5 inches only but subject to change. 


Yikes!    ::MonkeyShocked::   This sort of information causes us southern monkeys to behave very strangely doing things like stocking up on groceries and driving erratically.

Must immediately go do same!   ::MonkeyHaHa::




Unhook the hoses...before they freeze....again.... ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: private eye on March 07, 2008, 02:12:11 PM
It would take at leat 4 fairly strong males to carry the crab cage to the boat, lift it in the boat, and 3 to dump it. I think if they did use the ocean, they used a smaller cage and took it as least out to the 1000 ft drop off. That is assuming the cage weighs 700lbs as reported.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: klaasend on March 07, 2008, 02:19:27 PM
Running to a couple of stores, be back in a bit   ::MonkeyWink::

I know you all are saying, isn't Klaas taking a long time at the store? ::MonkeyHaHa::  Not really, since I went to Walmart and purchased a 32" LCD TV, then went to the grocery store and put away the groceries  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on March 07, 2008, 02:23:24 PM
I'd like one mystery cleared up - Is Ronchi de Cuba a guy or a girl?

I literally have no idea.  ::MonkeyConfused::


Kinda like>>>>  ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: hotping on March 07, 2008, 02:23:52 PM
Running to a couple of stores, be back in a bit   ::MonkeyWink::

I know you all are saying, isn't Klaas taking a long time at the store? ::MonkeyHaHa::  Not really, since I went to Walmart and purchased a 32" LCD TV, then went to the grocery store and put away the groceries  ::MonkeyHaHa::
Darn You Are Good...Glad You're Back!  ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Kiwi on March 07, 2008, 02:24:13 PM
Ya thats the post with the mention of the boat. So lets say Joran calls for help 2:30-3:00am help arrives they access the situation he either leaves or helps. Its possible the help breaks into the hut. Finds the keys eventually and loads up the trap and Natalee. Its also possible J2K go to the racket club to pickup the  bag to return back to the beach and clean up anything that remained clothing and shoes or they got the bag out of Paulus's car when he arrived to help.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: private eye on March 07, 2008, 02:24:25 PM
here's a boat from the though print site.

Machibo - name on the side. I enlarged it and it may not be clear.

(http://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p149/Morgan2112_2006/Machibo2.png)

Where is the engine?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Buckeye on March 07, 2008, 02:27:56 PM
Ya thats the post with the mention of the boat. So lets say Joran calls for help 2:30-3:00am help arrives they access the situation he either leaves or helps. Its possible the help breaks into the hut. Finds the keys eventually and loads up the trap and Natalee. Its also possible J2K go to the racket club to pickup the  bag to return back to the beach and clean up anything that remained clothing and shoes or they got the bag out of Paulus's car when he arrived to help.

So is the story about the three fishermen there that night, that only saw a jeep-like vehicle, not accurate?   ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Pita on March 07, 2008, 02:30:06 PM
I'd like one mystery cleared up - Is Ronchi de Cuba a guy or a girl?

I literally have no idea.  ::MonkeyConfused::

LOL....Ronchi is a guy!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Kiwi on March 07, 2008, 02:37:31 PM
Ya thats the post with the mention of the boat. So lets say Joran calls for help 2:30-3:00am help arrives they access the situation he either leaves or helps. Its possible the help breaks into the hut. Finds the keys eventually and loads up the trap and Natalee. Its also possible J2K go to the racket club to pickup the  bag to return back to the beach and clean up anything that remained clothing and shoes or they got the bag out of Paulus's car when he arrived to help.

So is the story about the three fishermen there that night, that only saw a jeep-like vehicle, not accurate?   ::MonkeyConfused::
It sure means the ALE has got to go a lot deeper into this. So how do you steal the trap and break-into the huts with the fisherman present. Is this where the ATM cash comes into play?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Rob on March 07, 2008, 02:38:21 PM
I'd like one mystery cleared up - Is Ronchi de Cuba a guy or a girl?

I literally have no idea.  ::MonkeyConfused::


Kinda like>>>>  ::MonkeyLaugh::

right Nut...It's like with Julia and Angela. You can just tell those two are men. Julia's man hands and Angela's mustache.  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Buckeye on March 07, 2008, 02:38:21 PM
Two fishermen??

CNN July 5, 2005

M. O'BRIEN: In Aruba, Natalee Holloway's father says the FBI told the family two weeks ago it's likely she's not alive.

Meanwhile, CNN has learned two fishermen allegedly told investigators they did not see a couple matching Holloway and Joran Van Der Sloot's description at the beach the night she disappeared.

Chris Lawrence live now in Palm Beach, Aruba.

Chris, give us the latest.

CHRIS LAWRENCE, CNN CORRESPONDENT: Miles, we've been waiting to hear what convinced a judge to detain Joran Van Der Sloot in jail while letting his two friends go free. Now a defense attorney claims it may have had something to do with what these two fishermen said. They were on the beach on the night Natalee Holloway disappeared.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

LAWRENCE (voice-over): A defense attorney tells CNN that two fishermen say they were on the same beach, on the same night, when Joran Van Der Sloot says he spent time with Natalee Holloway. But the fishermen say they never saw a couple matching their description.

DAVID KOCK, SATISH KALPOE'S ATTORNEY: They are so convinced that on that date during, if I'm not mistaken, 12:00 at night and 5:00 in the morning, there was no person, no girl, no other person on that -- on that beach.

LAWRENCE: Attorney David Kock says the fishermen did see one vehicle in the area.

KOCK: They had seen a Jeep type of car during -- in that time frame that stayed for about 30 to 40 minutes.


http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0507/06/ltm.05.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Rob on March 07, 2008, 02:41:51 PM
here's a boat from the though print site.

Machibo - name on the side. I enlarged it and it may not be clear.

(http://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p149/Morgan2112_2006/Machibo2.png)

Where is the engine?

Private Eye,
Probably locked in a hut. It probably has a small outboard that is clipped on. That is just a representation to show there are names on the side of the boats and not numbers.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Rob on March 07, 2008, 02:43:21 PM
I'd like one mystery cleared up - Is Ronchi de Cuba a guy or a girl?

I literally have no idea.  ::MonkeyConfused::

LOL....Ronchi is a guy!!

ooooooooohhhhhhhh :smt102 I saw an alphabet of chromosomes. LOL


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: dennisintn on March 07, 2008, 02:47:46 PM
Running to a couple of stores, be back in a bit   ::MonkeyWink::

I know you all are saying, isn't Klaas taking a long time at the store? ::MonkeyHaHa::  Not really, since I went to Walmart and purchased a 32" LCD TV, then went to the grocery store and put away the groceries  ::MonkeyHaHa::

yeah, but you took your car.  according to klaas., she was going to run to the store.  sure hope she didn't buy a 32" lcd tv.  it'll be tomorrow before she gets back.
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Kiwi on March 07, 2008, 02:48:59 PM
Buckeye if thats the case then all the kids staying at he Holiday Inn that went down to the beach after the bar really don't count or anyone staying at the Mariott. Maybe the beach was closed from 12-5am. I would agree with 3-5am but not 12-3am on that beach.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Rob on March 07, 2008, 02:55:26 PM
I have been meaning to say this, but I keep forgetting. I know I have said I believe the case is solved and I really believe that. I also believe the Arubans have twisted their version of Dutch law into a pretzel. No legal system is set-up to operate like this. If Joran would have committed this crime in Saudi Arabia his head would have been lopped off on day three.

I believe the case is going to be prosecuted at some point. I don't know if it will be today or tomorrow, but it will at some point. I haven't said that before. I have been hopeful, but I believe Joran and his crew are about finished.

There are too many investigators involved and they all want to see Joran in jail. Joran can not keep his mouth shut. He's an idiot and the FBI is not interested in him from a "study" standpoint - like with the fictional character Hannibal Lecter. They believe he is just a lying sack of crap and there is nothing unique about him. He's only out of jail because there are people protecting him.

Too many people are not letting this go. So it will be prosecuted at some point.

Now, my worries.

I am worried about Beth. All of this unnecessary suffering is bound to have long term effects and I hope she is getting treatment. There is no reason Beth should have to suffer like she is. That is the fault of everyone in the prosecutors office. Beth is a great lady and a true role model for mothers and daughters everywhere. And for fathers and sons too.

Beth is an inspiration to me, and I hope she lives a long healthy life full of dreams that come true.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on March 07, 2008, 02:55:38 PM
Per MF @ RU today>>>>>>>>>...
MF Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2008 11:20 am   

Let's hope Patrick does not threaten any fellow Antillean, because he will have some problems in Holland, bo mes sa, swa!! LOL.

Anyway, he said on tape that he helped Joran with money to pay off the person/help the person that "helped" him with the boat. Maybe Patrick's papiamento was not that good, because during the interview he says a few things that were literally translated from Dutch and are not perfect sentences in papiamento.... swa.

Conjo, no? Mi lo caba cu e famia ey!

Last edited by MF on Fri Mar 07, 2008 11:06 am; edited 1 time in total
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Peter acted illegally, but Joran has not taken him and Patrick to court yet.

In Castro's case, Patrick agreed to an interview on camera, but since the last part according to Patrick he did not agree to be on film, they are saying it's illegally obtained. Castro says it's accidental and Peters was planned.

And once again Mos is acting based on the media. In the beginning he did not want the tape, because he said that it was not relevant. Castro called him tunnelvision on tv, and after the airing and articles in the media has asked for a copy.... :roll:

Last edited by MF on Fri Mar 07, 2008 11:50 am; edited 2 times in total 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~



Oh.......and Glenda had a slip of the fingers....hehe--just as I have always believed!!!!
"You'll have to wait for MF, I just translated what he posted."


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: private eye on March 07, 2008, 03:03:54 PM
here's a boat from the though print site.

Machibo - name on the side. I enlarged it and it may not be clear.

(http://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p149/Morgan2112_2006/Machibo2.png)

Where is the engine?

Private Eye,
Probably locked in a hut. It probably has a small outboard that is clipped on. That is just a representation to show there are names on the side of the boats and not numbers.

But no engine was reported stolen


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Rob on March 07, 2008, 03:06:41 PM
FOX NEWS - VENEZUELA CROSSES INTO COLOMBIA AND FIRES SHOTS.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Destiny on March 07, 2008, 03:12:27 PM
O/T

THE NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE IN BIRMINGHAM HAS ISSUED A HEAVY
SNOW WARNING...WHICH IS IN EFFECT FROM 6 PM THIS EVENING TO 10 AM
CST SATURDAY. THE WINTER STORM WATCH IS NO LONGER IN EFFECT.

http://www.srh.noaa.gov/bmx/cgi-bin/wxs1.php?sid=BMX&pil=WSW&version=0&max=13



It does say the expected snowfall to be about 2.5 inches only but subject to change. 


Yikes!    ::MonkeyShocked::   This sort of information causes us southern monkeys to behave very strangely doing things like stocking up on groceries and driving erratically.

Must immediately go do same!   ::MonkeyHaHa::




LOL Anna...I also stock up on...cat/dog food...kitty litter...crystal ice melter...and Chocolate!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Observer on March 07, 2008, 03:15:42 PM
FOX NEWS - VENEZUELA CROSSES INTO COLOMBIA AND FIRES SHOTS.

That would be a very stupid move!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Destiny on March 07, 2008, 03:16:10 PM
Running to a couple of stores, be back in a bit   ::MonkeyWink::

I know you all are saying, isn't Klaas taking a long time at the store? ::MonkeyHaHa::  Not really, since I went to Walmart and purchased a 32" LCD TV, then went to the grocery store and put away the groceries  ::MonkeyHaHa::

LOL Klaas...we all know you get it all done so fast, because you have....wings....Angels come in many forms ;-)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on March 07, 2008, 03:17:29 PM
FOX NEWS - VENEZUELA CROSSES INTO COLOMBIA AND FIRES SHOTS.


Well, well, well, interesting.....just yesterday this was reported>
Not much to Venezuelan buildup, say US defence officials
Published on Thursday, March 6, 2008
http://www.caribbeannetnews.com/venezuela/venezuela.php?news_id=6488&start=0&category_id=12


Then today>>
Chavez's support for FARC is a time-bomb, says Colombia's vice president
Published on Friday, March 7, 2008
http://www.caribbeannetnews.com/venezuela/venezuela.php?news_id=6515&start=0&category_id=12


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: vms on March 07, 2008, 03:20:19 PM
Per MF @ RU today>>>>>>>>>...
MF Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2008 11:20 am   

Let's hope Patrick does not threaten any fellow Antillean, because he will have some problems in Holland, bo mes sa, swa!! LOL.

Anyway, he said on tape that he helped Joran with money to pay off the person/help the person that "helped" him with the boat. Maybe Patrick's papiamento was not that good, because during the interview he says a few things that were literally translated from Dutch and are not perfect sentences in papiamento.... swa.

Conjo, no? Mi lo caba cu e famia ey!

Last edited by MF on Fri Mar 07, 2008 11:06 am; edited 1 time in total
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Peter acted illegally, but Joran has not taken him and Patrick to court yet.

In Castro's case, Patrick agreed to an interview on camera, but since the last part according to Patrick he did not agree to be on film, they are saying it's illegally obtained. Castro says it's accidental and Peters was planned.

And once again Mos is acting based on the media. In the beginning he did not want the tape, because he said that it was not relevant. Castro called him tunnelvision on tv, and after the airing and articles in the media has asked for a copy.... :roll:

Last edited by MF on Fri Mar 07, 2008 11:50 am; edited 2 times in total 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~



Oh.......and Glenda had a slip of the fingers....hehe--just as I have always believed!!!!
"You'll have to wait for MF, I just translated what he posted."


Pronoun confusion or more than one behind that nic?

From MF @ FOB:


MF
Posted: Fri Jan 26th, 2007 09:57 pm


My husband's dog is sick.

He has an American Terrier.

But has been diagnosed with the virus of Distemper.

He took the dog to the vet again this afternoon, and got a lot of medicines and shot. Thank God he get his yearly shots, but apparently there is an epidemic right now.

My parents told me to use Aloe (liquified it) and it will help.

I read online that is incurable and often fatal.... can someone help me out with more info?


MF
Posted: Sat Jan 27th, 2007 11:09 am


Thanks for your help.

We will go to the vet again this afternoon.

Yes, we have isolated the dog, since the vet told us that he might infect others (neighbors). We only have one dog....

Thanks, will let you know what the vet tell us today.


MF
Posted: Tue Jan 30th, 2007 07:28 am


Thanks Ruby and all for the information...

But yesterday morning, it was decided to put Oliver to sleep.

He was suffering, and we didn't want to see him in that situation.

I am in a kinda mourning and my husband ... well you can imagine someone

who loves his pet so much.



Thank you all.

MF


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Buckeye on March 07, 2008, 03:24:05 PM
Buckeye if thats the case then all the kids staying at he Holiday Inn that went down to the beach after the bar really don't count or anyone staying at the Mariott. Maybe the beach was closed from 12-5am. I would agree with 3-5am but not 12-3am on that beach.

Maybe there was no one down by fisherman huts, like Joran claimed.  Fishermen didn't say anything about by the hotels, just by the huts.   :smt102


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: klaasend on March 07, 2008, 03:28:16 PM
Maybe MF = Ronchi  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Buckeye on March 07, 2008, 03:31:00 PM
Per MF @ RU today>>>>>>>>>...
MF Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2008 11:20 am   

Let's hope Patrick does not threaten any fellow Antillean, because he will have some problems in Holland, bo mes sa, swa!! LOL.

Anyway, he said on tape that he helped Joran with money to pay off the person/help the person that "helped" him with the boat. Maybe Patrick's papiamento was not that good, because during the interview he says a few things that were literally translated from Dutch and are not perfect sentences in papiamento.... swa.

Conjo, no? Mi lo caba cu e famia ey!

Last edited by MF on Fri Mar 07, 2008 11:06 am; edited 1 time in total
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Peter acted illegally, but Joran has not taken him and Patrick to court yet.

In Castro's case, Patrick agreed to an interview on camera, but since the last part according to Patrick he did not agree to be on film, they are saying it's illegally obtained. Castro says it's accidental and Peters was planned.

And once again Mos is acting based on the media. In the beginning he did not want the tape, because he said that it was not relevant. Castro called him tunnelvision on tv, and after the airing and articles in the media has asked for a copy.... :roll:

Last edited by MF on Fri Mar 07, 2008 11:50 am; edited 2 times in total 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~



Oh.......and Glenda had a slip of the fingers....hehe--just as I have always believed!!!!
"You'll have to wait for MF, I just translated what he posted."


Pronoun confusion or more than one behind that nic?

From MF @ FOB:


MF
Posted: Fri Jan 26th, 2007 09:57 pm


My husband's dog is sick.

He has an American Terrier.

But has been diagnosed with the virus of Distemper.

He took the dog to the vet again this afternoon, and got a lot of medicines and shot. Thank God he get his yearly shots, but apparently there is an epidemic right now.

My parents told me to use Aloe (liquified it) and it will help.

I read online that is incurable and often fatal.... can someone help me out with more info?


MF
Posted: Sat Jan 27th, 2007 11:09 am


Thanks for your help.

We will go to the vet again this afternoon.

Yes, we have isolated the dog, since the vet told us that he might infect others (neighbors). We only have one dog....

Thanks, will let you know what the vet tell us today.


MF
Posted: Tue Jan 30th, 2007 07:28 am


Thanks Ruby and all for the information...

But yesterday morning, it was decided to put Oliver to sleep.

He was suffering, and we didn't want to see him in that situation.

I am in a kinda mourning and my husband ... well you can imagine someone

who loves his pet so much.



Thank you all.

MF

vms

You are very, very good.

Do you think MF is Ana Gesterkamp (sp?), daughter of Rosalie Klein?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Tater on March 07, 2008, 03:36:26 PM
Destiny,
   I was reading around yesterday in different places here and believe I read that one of the black security gaurds was talking about a guy that was always on the beach every single day and then suddenly gone...Maybe someone else is familiar with this story?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: klaasend on March 07, 2008, 03:38:25 PM
Reminder - there is a travel awareness/boycott group that will be in St. Louis this weekend.  Sunny and Ldstlou are doing a great job of bringing people to gether for this event.  Ldstlou has contacted all the local media.

http://vacation07.info/index.php



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: vms on March 07, 2008, 03:39:09 PM
Buckeye,

TY but I'm just nosey.  :lol:

That's what I have been told but I still think there may be more than one person posting. The attitude and style changes at times, IMO.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Observer on March 07, 2008, 03:42:08 PM
Destiny,
   I was reading around yesterday in different places here and believe I read that one of the black security gaurds was talking about a guy that was always on the beach every single day and then suddenly gone...Maybe someone else is familiar with this story?

Yes it is from the PV of Solvert Reneska talking about the thug "M" and the slim white guy.

http://homepage.mac.com/mcgraw.kalpoe.docs/.Public/Statements/reneskajuly8.pdf


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Buckeye on March 07, 2008, 03:47:30 PM
Buckeye,

TY but I'm just nosey.  :lol:

That's what I have been told but I still think there may be more than one person posting. The attitude and style changes at times, IMO.

No, you're very accurate...not just nosey.. ::MonkeyCool::

I agree on changing styles...at times, a real page from AHATA, at other times a scorned woman.... ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Tater on March 07, 2008, 03:52:20 PM
Destiny,
   I was reading around yesterday in different places here and believe I read that one of the black security gaurds was talking about a guy that was always on the beach every single day and then suddenly gone...Maybe someone else is familiar with this story?

Yes it is from the PV of Solvert Reneska talking about the thug "M" and the slim white guy.

http://homepage.mac.com/mcgraw.kalpoe.docs/.Public/Statements/reneskajuly8.pdf

Thankyou *******,
  I get to floating around on pages here sometimes until my head is swimming.Thanks for paying such great attention.It helps immensly..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Observer on March 07, 2008, 04:11:06 PM

Yes it is from the PV of Solvert Reneska talking about the thug "M" and the slim white guy.

http://homepage.mac.com/mcgraw.kalpoe.docs/.Public/Statements/reneskajuly8.pdf

Thankyou *******,
  I get to floating around on pages here sometimes until my head is swimming.Thanks for paying such great attention.It helps immensly..

I know what you mean and your welcome! Also that Thug didn't dissapear off the face of the earth as I did see he was questioned somewhere in the case files. I don't think anyone knows who the slim white guy was/is.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 07, 2008, 04:11:23 PM
http://www.dutchnews.nl/news/archives/2008/03/friend_knows_who_dumped_natale.php

'Friend' knows who dumped Natalee
Friday 07 March 2008

Patrick van der Eem, the man who helped secretly record Joran van der Sloot confessing to being with Natalee Holloway when she died, has himself been secretly recorded by an Aruban tv company, Dutch media report on Friday.

After an interview on a local television station, Van der Eem carried on talking, thinking the cameras had been switched off.

But instead he was recorded saying that he knew who had dumped Natalee’s body at sea and that Van der Sloot had asked him for €2,000 to buy the man’s silence, the Telegraaf reports.

Van der Eem was also heard saying he had known Van der Sloot for several years. On Peter R de Vries’ tv programme, he claimed he befriended the Dutch student in a Nijmegen casino in 2007.

According to the Telegraaf, Van der Eem expects to become a millionaire because of his role in the Holloway affair. ‘And I will make sure that Joran and his entire family fall flat on their face. They had better emigrate to Africa,’ the paper quoted Van der Eem as saying.

Parts of the interview, which was recorded in Papiamento two weeks ago, have already been aired by TeleAruba. The interview was made following the news that Van der Eem has signed a US book deal.

News agency ANP reports that Van der Eem was furious after the partial broadcasts and has threatened interviewer Poentje Castro. Castro is seeking legal advice, ANP said.


© DutchNews.nl


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on March 07, 2008, 04:14:52 PM
Glenda Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2008 3:18 pm   
Exclusive secret tape on Dutch TV Friday

Supposedly 5 unseen minutes is being aired right now on a Dutch Channel. 

resigned wrote:
What Dutch Channel?

Glenda:
The one that starts with an S

~~~~~
SBS6


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on March 07, 2008, 04:16:27 PM
Pronkjewail wrote:


So, according to this tvpresenter Patrick has claimed to know who dumped Natalees body in the ocean. This person lives in Holland AND is hiding with Joran at the moment?

Geez, this case really gets freakier by the minute. Who needs the Bold& the Beautiful when you can follow this case????


http://www.hartvannederland.nl/item/6525/Van_der_Eem_bedreigt_tv_presentator

link via resigned


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 07, 2008, 04:17:59 PM
The involvement of the prosecutor implies that "lost in translation" is not where it is at as far as Patrick's words regarding who assisted in disposing of Natalee Holloways remains.

Janet

+++++++++++++



http://www.telegraaf.nl/binnenland/3498985/_Aruba_wil_gesprek_Van_der_Eem__.html

binnenland

vr 07 mrt 2008, 17:46
Justitie Aruba wil kopie gesprek Van der Eem

ARUBA -  Het Openbaar Ministerie op Aruba heeft een kopie gevraagd van het gesprek dat een lokale tv-presentator met Patrick van der Eem heeft gevoerd. Van der Eem, de Arubaanse Nederlander die Joran van der Sloot uitspraken wist te ontlokken over de verdwijing van Natalee Holloway, zou in het programma Un Dia den Bida hebben gezegd dat hij Van der Sloot al jaren kende voordat Peter R. de Vries hem vroeg undercover te gaan.

Het OM wil vaststellen wat er precies is gezegd door Van der Eem. Als het gesprek relevant is voor een eventuele rechterlijke beslissing in de strafzaak tegen Van der Sloot, dan zal het OM de beelden toevoegen aan het strafdossier, liet justitie vrijdag weten. „Naar die relevantie doen wij nu onderzoek.”

Tv-presentator Poentje Castro zei vrijdag dat Van der Eem hem met de dood heeft bedreigd naar aanleiding van het heimelijk opgenomen gesprek. De beelden zijn nog niet op de Arubaanse televisie getoond, maar waren wel deels te zien op YouTube.

Het OM liet vrijdag weten dat de gefilmde gesprekken tussen Joran van der Sloot en Van der Eem in diens auto op zich zelf staan. „De recente uitlatingen van Van der Eem op Aruba doen daar niets aan af”, aldus justitie.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Observer on March 07, 2008, 04:18:49 PM
But instead he was recorded saying that he knew who had dumped Natalee’s body at sea and that Van der Sloot had asked him for €2,000 to buy the man’s silence, the Telegraaf reports.

Why would Patrick buy this persons silence who dumped Natalee's body? That doesn't make any sense!

Van der Eem was also heard saying he had known Van der Sloot for several years. On Peter R de Vries’ tv programme, he claimed he befriended the Dutch student in a Nijmegen casino in 2007.

This reporting can't get any worse! The interviewer already said there was a mistake in translation and that Patrick never said he knew Joran for years!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on March 07, 2008, 04:21:09 PM
Glenda wrote:


According to people trying to call Patrick, he is no where to be found. He is not taking calls.... Not even Greta can find him. 

PATRICK IS MISSING!
~~~~~~~~~



:roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 07, 2008, 04:22:07 PM
Pronkjewail wrote:


So, according to this tvpresenter Patrick has claimed to know who dumped Natalees body in the ocean. This person lives in Holland AND is hiding with Joran at the moment?

Geez, this case really gets freakier by the minute. Who needs the Bold& the Beautiful when you can follow this case????


http://www.hartvannederland.nl/item/6525/Van_der_Eem_bedreigt_tv_presentator

link via resigned

Thanks Nut.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Observer on March 07, 2008, 04:22:33 PM
Pronkjewail wrote:


So, according to this tvpresenter Patrick has claimed to know who dumped Natalees body in the ocean. This person lives in Holland AND is hiding with Joran at the moment?

Geez, this case really gets freakier by the minute. Who needs the Bold& the Beautiful when you can follow this case????


http://www.hartvannederland.nl/item/6525/Van_der_Eem_bedreigt_tv_presentator

link via resigned

Hmm...Anyone seen Koen Gottenbos lately?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: caesu on March 07, 2008, 04:22:49 PM
http://www.hartvannederland.nl/item/6525/Van_der_Eem_bedreigt_tv_presentator

Poentje says that Patrick has said that Joran is in hiding in the netherlands together with the person who dumped Natalee in ocean.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Dihannah1 on March 07, 2008, 04:32:18 PM
FOX NEWS - VENEZUELA CROSSES INTO COLOMBIA AND FIRES SHOTS.

LOL,  sorry THAT's not funny, but FOX just reported and showed video of Columbian President getting up and walking over to the other presidents (Chavez and Ecuador) shaking hands and even hugging other top aides.  It's supposedly over now, as Columbians Prez, just did that and then said it's "over".    So, all is well now.  ::MonkeyEek::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: caesu on March 07, 2008, 04:33:05 PM
also SBS6 had a certified translator confirm the Revu's translation.

this was in the early edition of Hart van Nederland.
the follow up program starts in a minute.
i expect more about this or a reaction from Peter R. / Patrick

SBS6 is the same channel Peter R. has his program on.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: blah on March 07, 2008, 04:35:25 PM
http://www.hartvannederland.nl/item/6525/Van_der_Eem_bedreigt_tv_presentator

Poentje says that Patrick has said that Joran is in hiding in the netherlands together with the person who dumped Natalee in ocean.

so Paulus is in the Netherlands?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: JE on March 07, 2008, 04:36:31 PM
Pronkjewail wrote:


So, according to this tvpresenter Patrick has claimed to know who dumped Natalees body in the ocean. This person lives in Holland AND is hiding with Joran at the moment?

Geez, this case really gets freakier by the minute. Who needs the Bold& the Beautiful when you can follow this case????


http://www.hartvannederland.nl/item/6525/Van_der_Eem_bedreigt_tv_presentator

link via resigned

Hmm...Anyone seen Koen Gottenbos lately?

or guido wever? i thought gottenbos was in the US?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: JE on March 07, 2008, 04:37:42 PM
Destiny,
   I was reading around yesterday in different places here and believe I read that one of the black security gaurds was talking about a guy that was always on the beach every single day and then suddenly gone...Maybe someone else is familiar with this story?

Yes it is from the PV of Solvert Reneska talking about the thug "M" and the slim white guy.

http://homepage.mac.com/mcgraw.kalpoe.docs/.Public/Statements/reneskajuly8.pdf

His name is Marlon Celaire


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: private eye on March 07, 2008, 04:39:40 PM
Julia is one of the hardest working members of the coverup and misinformation task force. Her primary mission is to ensure that Beth is sentenced to a living hell for the rest of her life.

Why Julia? What's in it for you? Why do you think you can act so reprehensibly, so brazenly, so callously?

I hope one day, that I find a photo of you, hung up by the neck, with your hand in your pocket. I'll say I knew who that bitch. She finally did the right thing. And I won't lose one minutes sleep over it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: klaasend on March 07, 2008, 04:39:54 PM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/1LOCK.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Observer on March 07, 2008, 04:42:08 PM
Pronkjewail wrote:


So, according to this tvpresenter Patrick has claimed to know who dumped Natalees body in the ocean. This person lives in Holland AND is hiding with Joran at the moment?

Geez, this case really gets freakier by the minute. Who needs the Bold& the Beautiful when you can follow this case????


http://www.hartvannederland.nl/item/6525/Van_der_Eem_bedreigt_tv_presentator

link via resigned

Hmm...Anyone seen Koen Gottenbos lately?

or guido wever? i thought gottenbos was in the US?

Sander and Koen are most likely in the Eindhoven area. Sander plays for FC-Eindhoven

http://www.fc-eindhoven.nl/html/Jeugdopleiding/nl-NL/pages/teamg/index.html?idd=59&s=1&team=3


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Blonde on March 07, 2008, 04:44:17 PM
If this is the same link Klaas please delete it , I have the flu and i'm a little nuts today TY
http://www.hartvannederland.nl/item/6525/Van_der_Eem_bedreigt_tv_presentator


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Observer on March 07, 2008, 04:54:55 PM
Julia is one of the hardest working members of the coverup and misinformation task force. Her primary mission is to ensure that Beth is sentenced to a living hell for the rest of her life.

Why Julia? What's in it for you? Why do you think you can act so reprehensibly, so brazenly, so callously?

I hope one day, that I find a photo of you, hung up by the neck, with your hand in your pocket. I'll say I knew who that bitch. She finally did the right thing. And I won't lose one minutes sleep over it.

She will get her's in good time and no one will lose any sleep over it,not even the Arubans.... ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: klaasend on March 07, 2008, 05:03:56 PM
If this is the same link Klaas please delete it , I have the flu and i'm a little nuts today TY
http://www.hartvannederland.nl/item/6525/Van_der_Eem_bedreigt_tv_presentator

Carpe's youtubes are very popular  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Frijole on March 07, 2008, 05:04:08 PM
Glenda wrote:


According to people trying to call Patrick, he is no where to be found. He is not taking calls.... Not even Greta can find him. 

PATRICK IS MISSING!
~~~~~~~~~



:roll:

LOL  Well hell, Aruba will never be able to find him.  They couldn't find Natalee.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: JE on March 07, 2008, 05:05:56 PM
Pronkjewail wrote:


So, according to this tvpresenter Patrick has claimed to know who dumped Natalees body in the ocean. This person lives in Holland AND is hiding with Joran at the moment?

Geez, this case really gets freakier by the minute. Who needs the Bold& the Beautiful when you can follow this case????


http://www.hartvannederland.nl/item/6525/Van_der_Eem_bedreigt_tv_presentator

link via resigned

Hmm...Anyone seen Koen Gottenbos lately?

or guido wever? i thought gottenbos was in the US?

Sander and Koen are most likely in the Eindhoven area. Sander plays for FC-Eindhoven

http://www.fc-eindhoven.nl/html/Jeugdopleiding/nl-NL/pages/teamg/index.html?idd=59&s=1&team=3

Sander Gottenbos heeft tijdens het seizoen de Jeugdopleiding van FC Eindhoven verlaten.

Sander Gottenbos has left the youth training programme of FC Eindhoven during the season


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Blonde on March 07, 2008, 05:14:50 PM
Here is a good photo showing the simple padlock on the door at the huts:

It is from this site, apparently 2003:

http://www.island-temptations.com/old/summer03/story4/

I believe the green doors are on the back of the huts, but someone can confirm this.

(http://i27.tinypic.com/20zah6r.jpg)



ARUBA TODAY
Julia Renfro….Editor

ISLAND TEMPTATIONS Magazine
Julia Renfro….Photography
Heleen Bongers…..Editor

WATERSPORT Co. Owners
Julia Renfro
Heleen & Erik Bongers

Based on the collaboration between Renfro and Renée Gielen in the recent Amigoe articles, it looks like Julia might be trying out her hand at tabloid reporting, in preparation for her reputed new job with The Globe magazine.





and there is this caption ~ (Left) Heidi Munzenhoffer modeling her own design


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: katrien on March 07, 2008, 05:17:41 PM
Poentje said that v.d. Eem called Poentje and threatened him.

Is the phonecall on tape so Poentje can prove this? ::MonkeyCool::


According to Poentje the phonecall was last sunday and according to Poentje  Patrick is hiding since.

How come Patrick appeared in the show of Jensen after sunday?
He was hiding wasn't he?  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Patrick came on the phone tonight and told he did not want to give any comment.

So we have to wait and see. ::MonkeyWink::




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: JE on March 07, 2008, 05:20:12 PM
If this is the same link Klaas please delete it , I have the flu and i'm a little nuts today TY
http://www.hartvannederland.nl/item/6525/Van_der_Eem_bedreigt_tv_presentator

Just listend to it apparently patrick called poentje castro and said
"Aruba is small you know, you could dissapear just like Natalee Holloway did"" Poentje says it was a direct threat against his life and that he will press charges. He also says that Patrick stated he knows the name of the guy who threw Natalee into the ocean. He knows his first and last name and where he lives in Holland. Joran and the mystery man are hiding together.

The transcript that i translated yesterday from nieuwe revu has been verified by an official translator hired by SBS6.
Translator says thet nieuwe revu's version is correct


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Observer on March 07, 2008, 05:21:57 PM
Pronkjewail wrote:


So, according to this tvpresenter Patrick has claimed to know who dumped Natalees body in the ocean. This person lives in Holland AND is hiding with Joran at the moment?

Geez, this case really gets freakier by the minute. Who needs the Bold& the Beautiful when you can follow this case????


http://www.hartvannederland.nl/item/6525/Van_der_Eem_bedreigt_tv_presentator

link via resigned

Hmm...Anyone seen Koen Gottenbos lately?

or guido wever? i thought gottenbos was in the US?

Sander and Koen are most likely in the Eindhoven area. Sander plays for FC-Eindhoven

http://www.fc-eindhoven.nl/html/Jeugdopleiding/nl-NL/pages/teamg/index.html?idd=59&s=1&team=3

Sander Gottenbos heeft tijdens het seizoen de Jeugdopleiding van FC Eindhoven verlaten.

Sander Gottenbos has left the youth training programme of FC Eindhoven during the season
(http://i103.photobucket.com/albums/m153/CMPM/koen.jpg)

They were both in Holland late last summer..Hard to say for sure where they are now..Sander is still pretty young but his Family seems to have plenty of money so he could be anywhere right now..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 07, 2008, 05:22:28 PM
From the getgo ... in their quest to further an Aruban agenda to distance Paulus and Joran from implication in the Natalee Holloway case ... the trolls have despicably undermine an anguished mother's every word and action.

Janet

+++++++++

DOCUMENTARY

July 3, 2007
The other side of the Holloway-case
‘Police Aruba hindered by FBI’
By Michael Willemse


<snipped>

MEDPLANE

They revealed that already one day after Holloway was declared missing, a medplane (medical plane or ambulance-plane) from the US arrived on Reina Beatrix airport and was stationed for a few days in the area of the airport where private jets park. Nothing strange about that on the surface, except that the crew (two pilots, a doctor and a nurse) knew nothing about why they were there. Gielen and Van Stapele also discovered that the plane landed without authorization and was also not registered by the Aruban authorities, while the mysterious landing – even though it was reported to the police in an official unsigned written testimony –was subjugated by the corps to the investigation only months later. This is also the case for other testimonies.

SECRET EXIT

The ambulance plane needed to be used as a secret exit for Natalee to the US . Secret, for the local authorities weren’t allowed to get wind of this – if they succeeded in ‘liberating’ the girl from a drug warehouse in Oranjestad and secretly leave the island.

Angela Dilorenzo, an American living on Aruba and close the Natalee’s family in those first days, talks about the special task she was given by Beth Twitty, Natalee’s mother: “Please do me a favor, after you find Natalee, please cover her up and bring her to the medjet. We’ll take good care of you and they are already awaiting her at the airport.” Angela, who’s married to a restaurant owner on the island, has her voice recorded on the video, but does not appear on screen.

<snipped>

++++++++++++++++

Beth Twitty
On the Record w/ Greta
October 31, 2005


VAN SUSTEREN: Beth, Chief Deputy Dompig is making some accusations about you, says you’re scamming money. What do you say about that?

TWITTY: Well, you know, Greta, it’s hard for me to even respond to that, but if I must, I would hope that Deputy Dompig realizes that we’re not flying family, friends and searchers in and out on brooms to Aruba. You know, we pay air fares. We pay hotel bills. We pay the exorbitant attorney fees, private investigators. You know, one sample of a bill was $37,000 to Medjet because we had the jet sitting on the tarmac for two days because that’s when we thought we were pulling Natalee out alive of one of their crackhouses, being held by a crack addict against her will. So you know, there have been some expenses that we have incurred during this investigation.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: redheadedgal on March 07, 2008, 05:22:33 PM
ok - going back to only lurking... sorry to have wasted your bandwidth.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: caesu on March 07, 2008, 05:22:50 PM
Poentje said that v.d. Eem called Poentje and threatened him.

Is the phonecall on tape so Poentje can prove this? ::MonkeyCool::


According to Poentje the phonecall was last sunday and according to Poentje  Patrick is hiding since.

How come Patrick appeared in the show of Jensen after sunday?
He was hiding wasn't he?  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Patrick came on the phone tonight and told he did not want to give any comment.

So we have to wait and see. ::MonkeyWink::




i understand it as joran is in hiding together with 'daury' somewhere in the netherlands.
patricks knows where.
all this patrick told to poentje.

somewhere else poentje says there are 15 witnesses who heard the threathening phone call.
http://antilliaans.caribiana.nl/aruba/car20080307_vandereem


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 07, 2008, 05:23:11 PM
If this is the same link Klaas please delete it , I have the flu and i'm a little nuts today TY
http://www.hartvannederland.nl/item/6525/Van_der_Eem_bedreigt_tv_presentator

Just listend to it apparently patrick called poentje castro and said
"Aruba is small you know, you could dissapear just like Natalee Holloway did"" Poentje says it was a direct threat against his life and that he will press charges. He also says that Patrick stated he knows the name of the guy who threw Natalee into the ocean. He knows his first and last name and where he lives in Holland. Joran and the mystery man are hiding together.

The transcript that i translated yesterday from nieuwe revu has been verified by an official translator hired by SBS6.
Translator says thet nieuwe revu's version is correct

You just listened to what, the recorded phone conversation or something else?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Rob on March 07, 2008, 05:25:04 PM
If this is the same link Klaas please delete it , I have the flu and i'm a little nuts today TY
http://www.hartvannederland.nl/item/6525/Van_der_Eem_bedreigt_tv_presentator
GET WELL SOON Blonde!!!

Seems everyone had it this year..



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: JE on March 07, 2008, 05:27:55 PM
If this is the same link Klaas please delete it , I have the flu and i'm a little nuts today TY
http://www.hartvannederland.nl/item/6525/Van_der_Eem_bedreigt_tv_presentator

Just listend to it apparently patrick called poentje castro and said
"Aruba is small you know, you could dissapear just like Natalee Holloway did"" Poentje says it was a direct threat against his life and that he will press charges. He also says that Patrick stated he knows the name of the guy who threw Natalee into the ocean. He knows his first and last name and where he lives in Holland. Joran and the mystery man are hiding together.

The transcript that i translated yesterday from nieuwe revu has been verified by an official translator hired by SBS6.
Translator says thet nieuwe revu's version is correct

adding: Poentje says Patrick said on his tape where the mystery man lives in Holland. SBS6 reporter then asks IN THE NETHERLANDS? Poentje says:  eeeuh... i won't comment on that, van der eem says the guy is hiding with joran so he has to be in the netherlands

Apparently the show airs on sunday in aruba


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: JE on March 07, 2008, 05:28:57 PM
If this is the same link Klaas please delete it , I have the flu and i'm a little nuts today TY
http://www.hartvannederland.nl/item/6525/Van_der_Eem_bedreigt_tv_presentator

Just listend to it apparently patrick called poentje castro and said
"Aruba is small you know, you could dissapear just like Natalee Holloway did"" Poentje says it was a direct threat against his life and that he will press charges. He also says that Patrick stated he knows the name of the guy who threw Natalee into the ocean. He knows his first and last name and where he lives in Holland. Joran and the mystery man are hiding together.

The transcript that i translated yesterday from nieuwe revu has been verified by an official translator hired by SBS6.
Translator says thet nieuwe revu's version is correct

You just listened to what, the recorded phone conversation or something else?

the conversation in the link by blonde


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on March 07, 2008, 05:29:36 PM
From BFN:

LegallyLex
   
« Reply #135 on: Today at 04:14:42 PM »   

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The RV Persistence is fueling up in Mexico right now.  They should be home Tuesday morning! 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: JE on March 07, 2008, 05:30:56 PM
Poentje said that v.d. Eem called Poentje and threatened him.

Is the phonecall on tape so Poentje can prove this? ::MonkeyCool::


According to Poentje the phonecall was last sunday and according to Poentje  Patrick is hiding since.

How come Patrick appeared in the show of Jensen after sunday?
He was hiding wasn't he?  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Patrick came on the phone tonight and told he did not want to give any comment.

So we have to wait and see. ::MonkeyWink::




i understand it as joran is in hiding together with 'daury' somewhere in the netherlands.
patricks knows where.
all this patrick told to poentje.

somewhere else poentje says there are 15 witnesses who heard the threathening phone call.
http://antilliaans.caribiana.nl/aruba/car20080307_vandereem

Ceasu you got it right


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on March 07, 2008, 05:34:23 PM
Well Patrick probably will be arrested. Arrest someone for a verbal threat but not for confessing to having a young woman who was most likely in a coma thrown into the ocean.

Sounds about right.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: klaasend on March 07, 2008, 05:35:30 PM
ok - going back to only lurking... sorry to have wasted your bandwidth.

I'm sorry nobody responded to your earlier post but it happens sometimes.  Please don't take it personal as it happens all the time to me too.   ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: caesu on March 07, 2008, 05:35:58 PM
keeping in mind who this poentje castro is.
his dream is to get on dutch tv.

for now he managed to do this via carpe's youtube clips > tabloid revu magazine website > sbs6 tabloid tv program.
and a phone call to sbs6 tabloid tv program.

http://www.zorpia.com/onedayin
Quote
This same concept I started broadcasting two years ago on the islands Curacao, Bonaire and Sint Maarten. One of my biggest future plans is to reach the national TV in Holland.

now we have to wait till sunday's program. he learned that from peter r. to build up excitement for a program.
or maybe it gets cancelled again.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Buckeye on March 07, 2008, 05:39:08 PM
http://www.hartvannederland.nl/item/6525/Van_der_Eem_bedreigt_tv_presentator

Poentje says that Patrick has said that Joran is in hiding in the netherlands together with the person who dumped Natalee in ocean.

Is Val in school somewhere?  He graduated last year...I think...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: JE on March 07, 2008, 05:39:30 PM
Well Patrick probably will be arrested. Arrest someone for a verbal threat but not for confessing to having a young woman who was most likely in a coma thrown into the ocean.

Sounds about right.

This poentje character also said: if van der eem knows who that person is why in the name of god did he not go to the authorities? He wants to slove this case doesn't he?

he's got a point there IMO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on March 07, 2008, 05:41:13 PM
Sorry redhead...I see it too. Very clearly, but I just don't think it is her shirt...or what would be left of her shirt. I agree it does look like it though.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: CapsLockWizard on March 07, 2008, 05:43:43 PM
Klaasend: Mbox


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Observer on March 07, 2008, 05:46:12 PM
http://www.hartvannederland.nl/item/6525/Van_der_Eem_bedreigt_tv_presentator

Poentje says that Patrick has said that Joran is in hiding in the netherlands together with the person who dumped Natalee in ocean.

Is Val in school somewhere?  He graduated last year...I think...
I think he is in Aruba in his senior year as his pictures are on the ISA website.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Anna on March 07, 2008, 05:46:56 PM
Well Patrick probably will be arrested. Arrest someone for a verbal threat but not for confessing to having a young woman who was most likely in a coma thrown into the ocean.

Sounds about right.


I'd have to say Patrick stopped just short of a threat.  A threat is stating the intent to do something such as "I am going to kill you and I have the ways and means to do so, etc."  Just stating that something COULD happen is merely a cautionary and short of a threat.

But besides that, Aruba claims Joran only bought Natalee a drink and left her on the beach so perhaps that's what Patrick meant might happen to Poncho, lol!

I mean otherwise, Joran would have been in jail long ago, right?  So what possible threat could Patrick be making saying the same thing could happen to his buddy Poncho?

Besides, it's legal in Aruba to declare anybody as dead any citizen wants to so maybe Poncho looks sort of sick or dead to Patrick.  In that case, it would be perfectly legal for Patrick to dispose of him and only be charged with disposal of a corpse, a misdemeanor with very little jail time.

Or Patrick can always claim the "I am a Tremendous Liar" excuse.

When they allow all these things and more for Joran, they open them up to everybody.  Patrick might have even been smoking pot at the time he made the call, meaning all responsibility goes out the window and he is allowed to say or do anything.

Aruba has opened itself up to more ridicule with their handling of this case than even they can imagine.  If they think the press has been harsh so far, they haven't seen anything yet if they keep up this duel legality business.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: caesu on March 07, 2008, 05:49:59 PM
this poentje person doesn't bother me very much.

but that sbs6 has had a certified translator confirm the revu-translation.
that means the revu-transcript is correct.


patrick really has to explain his statements now.

or patrick was trying to impress poentje.
and lied about everything.

in the revu-transcript poentje is also quoted saying that what patrick was smoking wasn't drugs.
and there were a lot of profanities to make patrick feel comfortable so he would talk.

deja-vu.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: JE on March 07, 2008, 05:50:24 PM
Well Patrick probably will be arrested. Arrest someone for a verbal threat but not for confessing to having a young woman who was most likely in a coma thrown into the ocean.

Sounds about right.


I'd have to say Patrick stopped just short of a threat.  A threat is stating the intent to do something such as "I am going to kill you and I have the ways and means to do so, etc."  Just stating that something COULD happen is merely a cautionary and short of a threat.

But besides that, Aruba claims Joran only bought Natalee a drink and left her on the beach so perhaps that's what Patrick meant might happen to Poncho, lol!

I mean otherwise, Joran would have been in jail long ago, right?  So what possible threat could Patrick be making saying the same thing could happen to his buddy Poncho?

Besides, it's legal in Aruba to declare anybody as dead any citizen wants to so maybe Poncho looks sort of sick or dead to Patrick.  In that case, it would be perfectly legal for Patrick to dispose of him and only be charged with disposal of a corpse, a misdemeanor with very little jail time.

Or Patrick can always claim the "I am a Tremendous Liar" excuse.

When they allow all these things and more for Joran, they open them up to everybody.  Patrick might have even been smoking pot at the time he made the call, meaning all responsibility goes out the window and he is allowed to say or do anything.

Aruba has opened itself up to more ridicule with their handling of this case than even they can imagine.  If they think the press has been harsh so far, they haven't seen anything yet if they keep up this duel legality business.

.

i like sarcasm ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 07, 2008, 05:52:14 PM
Perhaps they don't think Patrick has a perosnality disorder, therefore, its OK to arrest him....LOL!

Either way I want to hear the name of the person hiding out with Joran! I'm sure the OM already has a draft of the press relase explaining it away.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: CapsLockWizard on March 07, 2008, 05:53:57 PM
Glenda wrote:


According to people trying to call Patrick, he is no where to be found. He is not taking calls.... Not even Greta can find him. 

PATRICK IS MISSING!
~~~~~~~~~



:roll:

LOL  Well hell, Aruba will never be able to find him.  They couldn't find Natalee.

He is in Aruba in ...I think he likes the exotic aruban food and there is now the mistery


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Anna on March 07, 2008, 05:55:52 PM
LOL re: the cereal boxes!!

i know it's been said that the cage and it's contents are not related to natalee but something i think i see makes me ask:

how does material fair when submerged in water for almost 3 years? does it shred? does it fade? does it dissolve? or does it remain intact?

the reason i ask is b/c (and i know my eyes must be playing tricks on me or i'm seeing what i want to see) just underneath and to the left of the number 12 in the bottom picture, it looks like there are stripes in the exact two colors and in the pattern of the halter top natalee was wearing in her last photos...


http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2641.480 (http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2641.480)


Redheadedgal,

I went back and found your post because didn't mean to ignore you.  I have been out but am sorry, I have no talent for seeing things in photos unless glaringly obvious.

I do see the last photo and what appears to be stripes and of the correct color which is very odd to me.

However we have been told by Tim Miller and more or less by Kyle that there is nothing in that particular trap that relates to Natalee.

So I don't know what to think but I do recognize and agree that there is a section of that photo that appears to my untraine eye as you stated, like the stripes and colors of her top.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: JE on March 07, 2008, 05:56:02 PM
Perhaps they don't think Patrick has a perosnality disorder, therefore, its OK to arrest him....LOL!

Either way I want to hear the name of the person hiding out with Joran! I'm sure the OM already has a draft of the press relase explaining it away.

Plus that poentje stated clearly that what he was smoking was not marihuanna but a cigarette. That should be enough to arrest him. Patrick did it case closed


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: JE on March 07, 2008, 05:58:26 PM
Glenda wrote:


According to people trying to call Patrick, he is no where to be found. He is not taking calls.... Not even Greta can find him. 

PATRICK IS MISSING!
~~~~~~~~~



:roll:

LOL  Well hell, Aruba will never be able to find him.  They couldn't find Natalee.

He is in Aruba in ...I think he likes the exotic aruban food and there is now the mistery
as in XTC?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Anna on March 07, 2008, 06:01:45 PM
i like sarcasm ::MonkeyDance::


Then I'm your girl!  I offer it as a service, free of charge!

Well, how can anyone be charged with anything after this???

How many should now be filing to have their own cases reinvestigated using the "I am a Tremendous Liar" or "I was smoking pot at the time" defense?

Should I commit a crime there, I feel a tremendous personality disorder would develop immediately, as you say.

I am still wondering how I can get EvilX to go to Aruba so I can declare him dead and toss him in the drink legally.  I wonder if free tickets for a cruise in his mailbox would do the trick.

What a country!

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: caesu on March 07, 2008, 06:04:08 PM
http://www.hartvannederland.nl/item/6539/Nieuwe_onthullingen_Van_der_Eem_in_zaak_Holloway

exclusive footage - not from youtube

-Joran hiding in Germany together with his buddy (who is from Rotterdam).

-Patrick won't comment, reverts to mr. Schouten - his spokesperson.

-Peter R. calls Poentje a nutcase

-OM want's a copy of the tape


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Anna on March 07, 2008, 06:04:19 PM
Perhaps they don't think Patrick has a perosnality disorder, therefore, its OK to arrest him....LOL!

Either way I want to hear the name of the person hiding out with Joran! I'm sure the OM already has a draft of the press relase explaining it away.

Where has Val been since graduation last year? 

Not many people could stand Joran long enough to be in hiding with him I suspect.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: caesu on March 07, 2008, 06:05:18 PM
http://www.hartvannederland.nl/item/6539/Nieuwe_onthullingen_Van_der_Eem_in_zaak_Holloway

exclusive footage - not from youtube

-Joran hiding in Germany together with his buddy (who is from Rotterdam). < Patrick said this to Poentje

-Patrick won't comment, reverts to mr. Schouten - his spokesperson.

-Peter R. calls Poentje a nutcase

-OM want's a copy of the tape


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Lala'sMom on March 07, 2008, 06:08:28 PM
Glenda wrote:


According to people trying to call Patrick, he is no where to be found. He is not taking calls.... Not even Greta can find him. 

PATRICK IS MISSING!
~~~~~~~~~



:roll:

LOL  Well hell, Aruba will never be able to find him.  They couldn't find Natalee.

He is in Aruba in ...I think he likes the exotic aruban food and there is now the mistery
as in XTC?

Just exactly what's in those exotic dinners?  Wonder if I would want to eat any of it?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Anna on March 07, 2008, 06:10:54 PM
But Patrick is back in The Netherlands as he was just there live on TV, right?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: JE on March 07, 2008, 06:12:52 PM
But Patrick is back in The Netherlands as he was just there live on TV, right?

he was on the phone


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Anna on March 07, 2008, 06:17:17 PM
threat       (thrět)  Pronunciation Key 
n.   
An expression of an intention to inflict pain, injury, evil, or punishment.
An indication of impending danger or harm.
One that is regarded as a possible danger; a menace.



Patrick did none of the above.   He merely stated what COULD happen.  That or even saying that one WISHES something to happen is not the same as stating that one is going to do thus and so.

Some people don't seem to understand the nature of that word very well.  To be considered legally, the person making the threat has to also be capable of carrying it out.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Anna on March 07, 2008, 06:19:14 PM
But Patrick is back in The Netherlands as he was just there live on TV, right?

he was on the phone


And Poncho just happened to have fifteen people in the room and put the phone on SPEAKER so they could ALL hear?

But then how is Patrick having exotic Aruban dinnas is what I was really wondering.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: caesu on March 07, 2008, 06:22:00 PM
http://www.hartvannederland.nl/item/6539/Nieuwe_onthullingen_Van_der_Eem_in_zaak_Holloway

exclusive footage - not from youtube

-Joran hiding in Germany together with his buddy (who is from Rotterdam). < Patrick said this to Poentje

-Patrick won't comment, reverts to mr. Schouten - his spokesperson.

-Peter R. calls Poentje a nutcase

-OM want's a copy of the tape

Poentjes's broadcast is sunday on tele curaçao


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: JE on March 07, 2008, 06:23:07 PM
But Patrick is back in The Netherlands as he was just there live on TV, right?

he was on the phone


And Poncho just happened to have fifteen people in the room and put the phone on SPEAKER so they could ALL hear?

But then how is Patrick having exotic Aruban dinnas is what I was really wondering.



Poncho claims that they were 15 people in the audience. I think he doesn't draw big crowds yet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: caesu on March 07, 2008, 06:24:49 PM
But Patrick is back in The Netherlands as he was just there live on TV, right?

he was on the phone


And Poncho just happened to have fifteen people in the room and put the phone on SPEAKER so they could ALL hear?

But then how is Patrick having exotic Aruban dinnas is what I was really wondering.



Poncho claims that they were 15 people in the audience. I think he doesn't draw big crowds yet

 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: dennisintn on March 07, 2008, 06:35:31 PM
Well Patrick probably will be arrested. Arrest someone for a verbal threat but not for confessing to having a young woman who was most likely in a coma thrown into the ocean.

Sounds about right.


I'd have to say Patrick stopped just short of a threat.  A threat is stating the intent to do something such as "I am going to kill you and I have the ways and means to do so, etc."  Just stating that something COULD happen is merely a cautionary and short of a threat.

But besides that, Aruba claims Joran only bought Natalee a drink and left her on the beach so perhaps that's what Patrick meant might happen to Poncho, lol!

I mean otherwise, Joran would have been in jail long ago, right?  So what possible threat could Patrick be making saying the same thing could happen to his buddy Poncho?

Besides, it's legal in Aruba to declare anybody as dead any citizen wants to so maybe Poncho looks sort of sick or dead to Patrick.  In that case, it would be perfectly legal for Patrick to dispose of him and only be charged with disposal of a corpse, a misdemeanor with very little jail time.

Or Patrick can always claim the "I am a Tremendous Liar" excuse.

When they allow all these things and more for Joran, they open them up to everybody.  Patrick might have even been smoking pot at the time he made the call, meaning all responsibility goes out the window and he is allowed to say or do anything.

Aruba has opened itself up to more ridicule with their handling of this case than even they can imagine.  If they think the press has been harsh so far, they haven't seen anything yet if they keep up this duel legality business.

.

i like sarcasm ::MonkeyDance::

i like sarcasm like this even more cause it's the irrefutable truth.
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Observer on March 07, 2008, 06:40:34 PM

Dennis being sarcastic? Tell me this isn't true!  ::MonkeyWink::

This whole Patrick thing is giving me a enormous headache! I hope he isn't playing both sides for his own personal gains! Why the hell would he pay the person who disposed of Natalee 2,000 euros to stay silent? Did he pay Joran anything?  ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: katrien on March 07, 2008, 06:43:42 PM
Quote
Poentje said that v.d. Eem called Poentje and threatened him.

Is the phonecall on tape so Poentje can prove this? ::MonkeyCool::


According to Poentje the phonecall was last sunday and according to Poentje  Patrick is hiding since.

How come Patrick appeared in the show of Jensen after sunday?
He was hiding wasn't he?  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Patrick came on the phone tonight and told he did not want to give any comment.

So we have to wait and see. ::MonkeyWink::



i understand it as joran is in hiding together with 'daury' somewhere in the netherlands.
patricks knows where.
all this patrick told to poentje.

somewhere else poentje says there are 15 witnesses who heard the threathening phone call.
http://antilliaans.caribiana.nl/aruba/car20080307_vandereem

Poentjes last words of the interview are:
"en buiten dit eheh zegt Patrick dat eh zegt hij dat hij nu samen met Joran verscholen zit, dus dan moet hij inderdaad in Nederland zitten ja".

"and besides this eheh Patrick says that eh, he says that he now together with Joran is hiding, so he indeed has to be hiding in Holland yes".

So "he" is the one who dropped Natalee in the sea? 
 
How does Patrick know?
Why would Patrick threaten Poentje?
Can Poentje prove this?

Does that mean that the phonecall from last sunday came in by loudspeakers? If the call did not come in by loudspeakers there can't be any witnesses or?
Was the phonecall, besides coming in by loudspeakers, also taped?
 
But if it is true that Patrick (and maybe also Peter) know who the person is, the truth will come out very soon.

Patrick v.d. Eem told SBS that he could not give comment, because all his words are being twisted.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 - 3/7/08
Post by: Anna on March 07, 2008, 06:45:42 PM
When I go to Aruba to declare people legally dead and pitch them in the drink, I want to be sure I get the Joran Laws applied to me and certainly not those that applied to the hapless Security Guards.  Don't want hustled out of bed and have all my things confiscated as happened to them.

I want the same treatment as Joran received but then I am even more white than he (Dutch/blonde/blue) is so I guess that is just a given that I would receive the Joran set of Laws instead of those that applied to the SG's.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: dennisintn on March 07, 2008, 06:47:53 PM
[

[/quote]

Poncho claims that they were 15 people in the audience. I think he doesn't draw big crowds yet
[/quote]

after watching him last week, i can understand the small crowds.  i wouldn't give up my day job if i were him.
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Observer on March 07, 2008, 06:48:37 PM
Quote

Poentjes last words of the interview are:
"en buiten dit eheh zegt Patrick dat eh zegt hij dat hij nu samen met Joran verscholen zit, dus dan moet hij inderdaad in Nederland zitten ja".

"and besides this eheh Patrick says that eh, he says that he now together with Joran is hiding, so he indeed has to be hiding in Holland yes".

So "he" is the one who dropped Natalee in the sea? 

How does Patrick know?

Why would Patrick threaten Poentje?
Can Poentje prove this?

Does that mean that the phonecall from last sunday came in by loudspeakers? If the call did not come in by loudspeakers there can't be any witnesses or?
Was the phonecall, besides coming in by loudspeakers, also taped?
 
But if it is true that Patrick (and maybe also Peter) know who the person is, the truth will come out very soon.

Patrick v.d. Eem told SBS that he could not give comment, because all his words are being twisted.



I think Patrick and Joran are still in contact with each other and still playing games. For the life of me I can't understand why that is..If he did really know who disposed of Natalee,why didn't he say anything weeks ago when they were accusing these Daury's? Did he promise the OM that he would not mention this person? His words are being twisted but something stinks about his current relationship with Joran!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 - 3/7/08
Post by: dennisintn on March 07, 2008, 06:50:34 PM
When I go to Aruba to declare people legally dead and pitch them in the drink, I want to be sure I get the Joran Laws applied to me and certainly not those that applied to the hapless Security Guards.  Don't want hustled out of bed and have all my things confiscated as happened to them.

I want the same treatment as Joran received but then I am even more white than he (Dutch/blonde/blue) is so I guess that is just a given that I would receive the Joran set of Laws instead of those that applied to the SG's.

.

that's easy enough to get.  just add "van der" to your last name, you'll have it made. 
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 - 3/7/08
Post by: Anna on March 07, 2008, 06:51:10 PM
I was trying to figure out how fifteen people heard Patrick threaten Poentje especially if by phone.  How could they do so unless he had it on speaker and they were present?

I don't think Patrick is hiding or missing as he was just on TV and is in The Netherlands, not Aruba.  Not taking phone calls from pests who want to hype their program with false statements is not the same as hiding.  Betcha Peter R could find him in a heartbeat.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 - 3/7/08
Post by: Rob on March 07, 2008, 06:55:45 PM
Katrien, could it be possible that Godfather Peter R was working on this new info and Patrick has put it all in a bad light. In a sense he has exposed Peter R's next chapter and now Mos knows?

I believe caesu stated the other day that Peter R was working on new leads.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 - 3/7/08
Post by: Anna on March 07, 2008, 06:57:17 PM
[


Poncho claims that they were 15 people in the audience. I think he doesn't draw big crowds yet
[/quote]

after watching him last week, i can understand the small crowds.  i wouldn't give up my day job if i were him.
dennisintn
[/quote]


And there is something about guys his age with grey hair trying to pick up chicks on MySpace that is somewhat untoward as well.  Can't quite put my finger on what that is but I just find that most unattractive.

Just my personal opinion and not meant to offend.

Also personally, I think he is making up every bit of what he is claiming Patrick said as Patrick himself has indicated that he thinks Paulus involved much more than has been stated.

I guess we will find out Sunday when he airs the conclusion of his big expose from Curacao.  Unless of course he then claims Hans Mos kept the only copy of the tape or some other equally unbelievable excuse.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 - 3/7/08
Post by: caesu on March 07, 2008, 06:58:50 PM
http://www.hartvannederland.nl/item/6525/Van_der_Eem_bedreigt_tv_presentator

at the end here Poentje says to SBS6 about Patricks statements :
"Patrick says he (Daury) is in hiding together with Joran. so he (Daury) must be in the netherlands"

but here:

http://www.hartvannederland.nl/item/6539/Nieuwe_onthullingen_Van_der_Eem_in_zaak_Holloway

Patrick:
"i know who dumped her in the ocean"
"i know where he lives, the man lives in rotterdam"
"but i didn't want to say his name"
"this man is in hiding together with him (Joran)"
Poentje:
"are they in Germany?"
Patrick:
"Yes..."

so Poentje is contradicting himself about what he heard from Patrick about where they are in hiding.

note: i use the name daury but poentje or patrick never said the name daury.
i just use this to name the mystery helper of joran.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 - 3/7/08
Post by: Anna on March 07, 2008, 06:59:15 PM
O/T

Arrest made in Auburn student's slaying
WSB-TV reports there has been an arrest in connection with Auburn freshman Lauren Burk of Marietta. The arrest was reportedly made in Phenix City, Ala., after a high-speed chase. WSB did not identify the man who was arrested, but reported that a Phenix City investigator said that the man was found with evidence that could link him to the Burk case. Phenix City police wouldn't immediately confirm the report. Go to ajc.com for updates.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 - 3/7/08
Post by: private eye on March 07, 2008, 06:59:19 PM
I was reading RU, in particular the Natalee is crazy thread. One idiot said that he needs more than Joran's words to convict him of a crime. I have heard that until I am PO. I say charge him with the most serious crime possible, based upon his own words, prosecute him, and convict him. I bet his personality disorder disappears and HE STARTS WORKING HARD TO CONVINCE US WHICH OF HIS WORDS ARE TRUE. I AM TIRED OF PLACATING THE MORON.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: JE on March 07, 2008, 06:59:26 PM
My favorite subject the shoes

Someone mentioned this cant remember who but thx it got me thinking.

All the confusion, one shoe found in closet, shoe with blood or mud, the sizes 10.5 or 14 etc etc

Joran june 9th PV: He says i could have wore creme coloured boots or white shoes.

Joran june  14th PV: I wore k-swiss size 14 blue and white shoes bought in USA

Now that last one is suspicious: Too much detail. I know that when i try to get my kids to tell the truth about something they did that the one who provides the most detailed story of what happened is usually the one that is not telling the whole truth.

The shoes be it one or two that the police had or had not in their posession with or without blood/mud on them seems to be rumours only. There is nothing i have found that substantiates this story. The only place they could have gotten hold of one or two shoes would be during the sloot house search on june 15th.

If this were the case then why would JVDS so conveniently have remembered on june 14th that he had lost kswiss size 14 etc. And why would he be so stupid to keep it in his house?

The only thing that this june 14th statement could achieve is incriminate him if police found a similar shoe the next day during the search.

The only way i can make the shoe story make any sense in my mind is that he mentioned the creme coloured boots or white shoes on june 9th. (I am assuming now that he really did dump his shoes for all obvious reasons forensic traces etc) He then realized he made a mistake and decided to focus attention on white kswiss of a very unusual size that he bought in USA. The USA detail would prevent anyone from going to the shop aroud the corner to ask the store keeper about this purchase and if questioned about the shop no one would think it odd that he would not remember.

So what i am saying is that maybe he was wearing the creme colored boots on may 30th and by stating in his june 14th PV the IMO much too detailed story of the Kswiss he made sure that if any creme colored boots were ever found in whatever location nobody would think twice about em.

I officially declare that this was my last post on the shoes


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: private eye on March 07, 2008, 07:02:20 PM
My favorite subject the shoes

Someone mentioned this cant remember who but thx it got me thinking.

All the confusion, one shoe found in closet, shoe with blood or mud, the sizes 10.5 or 14 etc etc

Joran june 9th PV: He says i could have wore creme coloured boots or white shoes.

Joran june  14th PV: I wore k-swiss size 14 blue and white shoes bought in USA

Now that last one is suspicious: Too much detail. I know that when i try to get my kids to tell the truth about something they did that the one who provides the most detailed story of what happened is usually the one that is not telling the whole truth.

The shoes be it one or two that the police had or had not in their posession with or without blood/mud on them seems to be rumours only. There is nothing i have found that substantiates this story. The only place they could have gotten hold of one or two shoes would be during the sloot house search on june 15th.

If this were the case then why would JVDS so conveniently have remembered on june 14th that he had lost kswiss size 14 etc. And why would he be so stupid to keep it in his house?

The only thing that this june 14th statement could achieve is incriminate him if police found a similar shoe the next day during the search.

The only way i can make the shoe story make any sense in my mind is that he mentioned the creme coloured boots or white shoes on june 9th. (I am assuming now that he really did dump his shoes for all obvious reasons forensic traces etc) He then realized he made a mistake and decided to focus attention on white kswiss of a very unusual size that he bought in USA. The USA detail would prevent anyone from going to the shop aroud the corner to ask the store keeper about this purchase and if questioned about the shop no one would think it odd that he would not remember.

So what i am saying is that maybe he was wearing the creme colored boots on may 30th and by stating in his june 14th PV the IMO much too detailed story of the Kswiss he made sure that if any creme colored boots were ever found in whatever location nobody would think twice about em.

I officially declare that this was my last post on the shoes

The ale thru one shoe away after they gathered it as evidence and Joran lied about the other lost shoe stating the incorrect size so that nobody would find it and think it was his, since Natalee's DNA was on it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 - 3/7/08
Post by: Rob on March 07, 2008, 07:04:22 PM
And another thing about Valentijn.

How could he be on Aruba when Anita was in Holland? Paulus was in Holland and are we to believe that Joran was watching Valentijn while he was gambling and drinking all over the Holiday Inn and downtown Oranjestad? Paulus came back before Anita. He has never declared, to my knowledge, that he return with either kid.

He came back by himself.

Think about it. Where was Valentijn? He magically appears on the computer.

So either Valentijn is on Aruba and being watched by the part-time maid and Joran, or he is in Holland with Anita.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 - 3/7/08
Post by: caesu on March 07, 2008, 07:04:46 PM
Katrien, could it be possible that Godfather Peter R was working on this new info and Patrick has put it all in a bad light. In a sense he has exposed Peter R's next chapter and now Mos knows?

I believe caesu stated the other day that Peter R was working on new leads.

that was GMBW, it got that nick right.
he is connected to a dutch current affairs program.
they were in contact with Peter R. and that's how he knows about the new leads.

but i am sure Peter R. is working on his new broadcast.
only with all this BS popping up everywhere the first hour of the new broadcast probably will be debunking all the BS.
after that if there is time left he can start about the new leads.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 - 3/7/08
Post by: Nut44x4 on March 07, 2008, 07:10:16 PM
For what it's worth>>

Hannie C. at RU is saying she just got word that the person w/ Joran is 'Jules D.' ...used to call himself Julian and always wears black and Spanish Flamenco boots.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 07, 2008, 07:10:54 PM

Dennis being sarcastic? Tell me this isn't true!  ::MonkeyWink::

This whole Patrick thing is giving me a enormous headache! I hope he isn't playing both sides for his own personal gains! Why the hell would he pay the person who disposed of Natalee 2,000 euros to stay silent? Did he pay Joran anything?  ::MonkeyConfused::

I agree, a headache indeed. Really, he had one job and one job only and that was to keep his friggin mouth shut and let things play out.

I still don't know if any of this is positive or if its just more noise.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 - 3/7/08
Post by: Observer on March 07, 2008, 07:11:48 PM
And another thing about Valentijn.

How could he be on Aruba when Anita was in Holland? Paulus was in Holland and are we to believe that Joran was watching Valentijn while he was gambling and drinking all over the Holiday Inn and downtown Oranjestad? Paulus came back before Anita. He has never declared, to my knowledge, that he return with either kid.

He came back by himself.

Think about it. Where was Valentijn? He magically appears on the computer.

So either Valentijn is on Aruba and being watched by the part-time maid and Joran, or he is in Holland with Anita.
Yes but Sebastian was only 10 years old at the time! Do the Van Der Sloots say they were staying with friends in Aruba? Everything points to them being in Holland with Anita,especially the 10 year old!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: katrien on March 07, 2008, 07:12:02 PM
Quote

Poentjes last words of the interview are:
"en buiten dit eheh zegt Patrick dat eh zegt hij dat hij nu samen met Joran verscholen zit, dus dan moet hij inderdaad in Nederland zitten ja".

"and besides this eheh Patrick says that eh, he says that he now together with Joran is hiding, so he indeed has to be hiding in Holland yes".

So "he" is the one who dropped Natalee in the sea? 

How does Patrick know?

Why would Patrick threaten Poentje?
Can Poentje prove this?

Does that mean that the phonecall from last sunday came in by loudspeakers? If the call did not come in by loudspeakers there can't be any witnesses or?
Was the phonecall, besides coming in by loudspeakers, also taped?
 
But if it is true that Patrick (and maybe also Peter) know who the person is, the truth will come out very soon.

Patrick v.d. Eem told SBS that he could not give comment, because all his words are being twisted.



I think Patrick and Joran are still in contact with each other and still playing games. For the life of me I can't understand why that is..If he did really know who disposed of Natalee,why didn't he say anything weeks ago when they were accusing these Daury's? Did he promise the OM that he would not mention this person? His words are being twisted but something stinks about his current relationship with Joran!

We'll find out soon. I do not believe Patrick is playing games.
But, I can be wrong.

I know one of the writers/translators of the interview is a cheater. I discovered his was involved only a few weeks ago.
He told lies in the past about an innocent person.
The same kind of lies the American couple, the fortunetellers do tell about Beth.

So, till we do not know exactly what has been told in the interview, it is not reliable at all to me.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 - 3/7/08
Post by: Rob on March 07, 2008, 07:12:02 PM
JE, Klaas has a picture of him in the creme colored boots from the Diario.

Jossy, at first, stated that this photo was from the nite in question and then later retracted that and said it was from a nite in March of the same year. Looks like he is wearing the same shirt IIRC, but the shirt are actually slightly different.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Magnolia on March 07, 2008, 07:13:02 PM
My favorite subject the shoes

Someone mentioned this cant remember who but thx it got me thinking.

All the confusion, one shoe found in closet, shoe with blood or mud, the sizes 10.5 or 14 etc etc

Joran june 9th PV: He says i could have wore creme coloured boots or white shoes.

Joran june  14th PV: I wore k-swiss size 14 blue and white shoes bought in USA

Now that last one is suspicious: Too much detail. I know that when i try to get my kids to tell the truth about something they did that the one who provides the most detailed story of what happened is usually the one that is not telling the whole truth.

The shoes be it one or two that the police had or had not in their posession with or without blood/mud on them seems to be rumours only. There is nothing i have found that substantiates this story. The only place they could have gotten hold of one or two shoes would be during the sloot house search on june 15th.

If this were the case then why would JVDS so conveniently have remembered on june 14th that he had lost kswiss size 14 etc. And why would he be so stupid to keep it in his house?

The only thing that this june 14th statement could achieve is incriminate him if police found a similar shoe the next day during the search.

The only way i can make the shoe story make any sense in my mind is that he mentioned the creme coloured boots or white shoes on june 9th. (I am assuming now that he really did dump his shoes for all obvious reasons forensic traces etc) He then realized he made a mistake and decided to focus attention on white kswiss of a very unusual size that he bought in USA. The USA detail would prevent anyone from going to the shop aroud the corner to ask the store keeper about this purchase and if questioned about the shop no one would think it odd that he would not remember.

So what i am saying is that maybe he was wearing the creme colored boots on may 30th and by stating in his june 14th PV the IMO much too detailed story of the Kswiss he made sure that if any creme colored boots were ever found in whatever location nobody would think twice about em.

I officially declare that this was my last post on the shoes

Why did the police even inquire about his shoes?  I don't remember them
asking Deepak and Satish about their shoes.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 - 3/7/08
Post by: Rob on March 07, 2008, 07:14:31 PM
Katrien, could it be possible that Godfather Peter R was working on this new info and Patrick has put it all in a bad light. In a sense he has exposed Peter R's next chapter and now Mos knows?

I believe caesu stated the other day that Peter R was working on new leads.

that was GMBW, it got that nick right.
he is connected to a dutch current affairs program.
they were in contact with Peter R. and that's how he knows about the new leads.

but i am sure Peter R. is working on his new broadcast.
only with all this BS popping up everywhere the first hour of the new broadcast probably will be debunking all the BS.
after that if there is time left he can start about the new leads.

thanks fer setting the record straight.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 - 3/7/08
Post by: CapsLockWizard on March 07, 2008, 07:15:53 PM
Klassend Mbox


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 - 3/7/08
Post by: JE on March 07, 2008, 07:16:58 PM
When I go to Aruba to declare people legally dead and pitch them in the drink, I want to be sure I get the Joran Laws applied to me and certainly not those that applied to the hapless Security Guards.  Don't want hustled out of bed and have all my things confiscated as happened to them.

I want the same treatment as Joran received but then I am even more white than he (Dutch/blonde/blue) is so I guess that is just a given that I would receive the Joran set of Laws instead of those that applied to the SG's.

.
sarcasm mode on

Maybe "drink dropping in aruba" is the slogan the new advertising agency could use to make tourism in aruba attractive to a very select group of people. Most of them probably of the personality disorder kind. Throw in a few free joints to make sure their stay is as pleasant as their personality. Have a welcomming evening where they are introduced to their victims and where an ex judge serves spiked drinks and gives legal tips in case you ever get into any real trouble.

sarcasm mode off


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 - 3/7/08
Post by: San on March 07, 2008, 07:18:07 PM
Who is going to help me get to 50.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 - 3/7/08
Post by: klaasend on March 07, 2008, 07:19:12 PM
JE, Klaas has a picture of him in the creme colored boots from the Diario.

Jossy, at first, stated that this photo was from the nite in question and then later retracted that and said it was from a nite in March of the same year. Looks like he is wearing the same shirt IIRC, but the shirt are actually slightly different.

Right, that photo was from March and not from May, the one of Joran dancing on the CnC dance floor.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 - 3/7/08
Post by: Nut44x4 on March 07, 2008, 07:20:26 PM
For what it's worth>>

Hannie C. at RU is saying she just got word that the person w/ Joran is 'Jules D.' ...used to call himself Julian and always wears black and Spanish Flamenco boots.


ME SAN! BUMPPPPPPPPPPP to 50


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 - 3/7/08
Post by: Rob on March 07, 2008, 07:21:15 PM
And another thing about Valentijn.

How could he be on Aruba when Anita was in Holland? Paulus was in Holland and are we to believe that Joran was watching Valentijn while he was gambling and drinking all over the Holiday Inn and downtown Oranjestad? Paulus came back before Anita. He has never declared, to my knowledge, that he return with either kid.

He came back by himself.

Think about it. Where was Valentijn? He magically appears on the computer.

So either Valentijn is on Aruba and being watched by the part-time maid and Joran, or he is in Holland with Anita.
Yes but Sebastian was only 10 years old at the time! Do the Van Der Sloots say they were staying with friends in Aruba? Everything points to them being in Holland with Anita,especially the 10 year old!

*******, this one is easy to clear up. The next time Jug or Beth are on Dana's show, some one should just ask if they saw either of the other kids before Anita got back on Wednesday.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 - 3/7/08
Post by: Bladerunner on March 07, 2008, 07:22:03 PM
For what it's worth>>

Hannie C. at RU is saying she just got word that the person w/ Joran is 'Jules D.' ...used to call himself Julian and always wears black and Spanish Flamenco boots.

How soon do you think we get a press release along the lines of..."the prosecutors office feels many people are being harrassed and that this must stop...we will protect anoyone close to Joran."

 ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 - 3/7/08
Post by: Anna on March 07, 2008, 07:22:30 PM
When I go to Aruba to declare people legally dead and pitch them in the drink, I want to be sure I get the Joran Laws applied to me and certainly not those that applied to the hapless Security Guards.  Don't want hustled out of bed and have all my things confiscated as happened to them.

I want the same treatment as Joran received but then I am even more white than he (Dutch/blonde/blue) is so I guess that is just a given that I would receive the Joran set of Laws instead of those that applied to the SG's.

.
sarcasm mode on

Maybe "drink dropping in aruba" is the slogan the new advertising agency could use to make tourism in aruba attractive to a very select group of people. Most of them probably of the personality disorder kind. Throw in a few free joints to make sure their stay is as pleasant as their personality. Have a welcomming evening where they are introduced to their victims and where an ex judge serves spiked drinks and gives legal tips in case you ever get into any real trouble.

sarcasm mode off


I think that is what has been going on there for some time now and the big fear that all the world is going to find out.

If Joran is convicted, he is sure to say, Well everybody else was doing it.

Even Dennis Jacobs told Dave Holloway all about how this is routinely done to tourists at Carlos and Charlies and warned Dave to watch his own drink there.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 - 3/7/08
Post by: San on March 07, 2008, 07:22:44 PM
For what it's worth>>

Hannie C. at RU is saying she just got word that the person w/ Joran is 'Jules D.' ...used to call himself Julian and always wears black and Spanish Flamenco boots.


ME SAN! BUMPPPPPPPPPPP to 50

Thanks   ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: JE on March 07, 2008, 07:22:52 PM
My favorite subject the shoes

Someone mentioned this cant remember who but thx it got me thinking.

All the confusion, one shoe found in closet, shoe with blood or mud, the sizes 10.5 or 14 etc etc

Joran june 9th PV: He says i could have wore creme coloured boots or white shoes.

Joran june  14th PV: I wore k-swiss size 14 blue and white shoes bought in USA

Now that last one is suspicious: Too much detail. I know that when i try to get my kids to tell the truth about something they did that the one who provides the most detailed story of what happened is usually the one that is not telling the whole truth.

The shoes be it one or two that the police had or had not in their posession with or without blood/mud on them seems to be rumours only. There is nothing i have found that substantiates this story. The only place they could have gotten hold of one or two shoes would be during the sloot house search on june 15th.

If this were the case then why would JVDS so conveniently have remembered on june 14th that he had lost kswiss size 14 etc. And why would he be so stupid to keep it in his house?

The only thing that this june 14th statement could achieve is incriminate him if police found a similar shoe the next day during the search.

The only way i can make the shoe story make any sense in my mind is that he mentioned the creme coloured boots or white shoes on june 9th. (I am assuming now that he really did dump his shoes for all obvious reasons forensic traces etc) He then realized he made a mistake and decided to focus attention on white kswiss of a very unusual size that he bought in USA. The USA detail would prevent anyone from going to the shop aroud the corner to ask the store keeper about this purchase and if questioned about the shop no one would think it odd that he would not remember.

So what i am saying is that maybe he was wearing the creme colored boots on may 30th and by stating in his june 14th PV the IMO much too detailed story of the Kswiss he made sure that if any creme colored boots were ever found in whatever location nobody would think twice about em.

I officially declare that this was my last post on the shoes

Why did the police even inquire about his shoes?  I don't remember them
asking Deepak and Satish about their shoes.

Because in the last version of the story he said he was on the beach and took em off?
Or maybe he said that in the missing PV of june 1st


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 - 3/7/08
Post by: Anna on March 07, 2008, 07:24:03 PM
OK, getting to Page 50 and Cage change.

I don't think anyone went to The Netherlands other than Anita.  She must have mistakenly thought Paulus could handle things for a week.  Wrongo Bongo!

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 - 3/7/08
Post by: katrien on March 07, 2008, 07:24:05 PM
Katrien, could it be possible that Godfather Peter R was working on this new info and Patrick has put it all in a bad light. In a sense he has exposed Peter R's next chapter and now Mos knows?

I believe caesu stated the other day that Peter R was working on new leads.

Peter R mentioned in interviews sereval times he is still working on the case.
And I have seen the interviews at Jensen. This was after the commotion about the Aruban show.

They were very relaxed. I just do not believe anything till I have seen prove.
We will have to wait and see, I guess.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 - 3/7/08
Post by: Anna on March 07, 2008, 07:25:06 PM
For what it's worth>>

Hannie C. at RU is saying she just got word that the person w/ Joran is 'Jules D.' ...used to call himself Julian and always wears black and Spanish Flamenco boots.


ME SAN! BUMPPPPPPPPPPP to 50

Thanks   ::MonkeyDance::


Like that Dude in the Stephen King movie?  Does he have taps on those boots as well????

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: JE on March 07, 2008, 07:26:46 PM


The ale thru one shoe away after they gathered it as evidence and Joran lied about the other lost shoe stating the incorrect size so that nobody would find it and think it was his, since Natalee's DNA was on it.
[/quote]

Is there any documents that say ALE found a shoe or shoes in the first place?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 - 3/7/08
Post by: klaasend on March 07, 2008, 07:26:58 PM
Katrien, could it be possible that Godfather Peter R was working on this new info and Patrick has put it all in a bad light. In a sense he has exposed Peter R's next chapter and now Mos knows?

I believe caesu stated the other day that Peter R was working on new leads.

Peter R mentioned in interviews sereval times he is still working on the case.
And I have seen the interviews at Jensen. This was after the commotion about the Aruban show.

They were very relaxed. I just do not believe anything till I have seen prove.
We will have to wait and see, I guess.

I agree, Peter and Patrick looked very relaxed on Jensen.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 - 3/7/08
Post by: San on March 07, 2008, 07:27:27 PM
OK, getting to Page 50 and Cage change.

I don't think anyone went to The Netherlands other than Anita.  She must have mistakenly thought Paulus could handle things for a week.  Wrongo Bongo!
.

I think she took the other two boys with her because she knew how violent Joran was towards them and she didn't trust Paulus (the drunk, coke head) with her two youngest.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 - 3/7/08
Post by: Anna on March 07, 2008, 07:27:48 PM
So Joran is hiding in Rotterdam or Germany with a Flamenco dancer named Jules???


 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 - 3/7/08
Post by: Observer on March 07, 2008, 07:28:04 PM

*******, this one is easy to clear up. The next time Jug or Beth are on Dana's show, some one should just ask if they saw either of the other kids before Anita got back on Wednesday.
You already know the answer to that question  ::MonkeyWink:: The question should be did anyone in Aruba see either one of these kids before wednesday! ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 - 3/7/08
Post by: Rob on March 07, 2008, 07:29:00 PM
So Joran is hiding in Rotterdam or Germany with a Flamenco dancer named Jules???


 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::



jib jab


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 - 3/7/08
Post by: San on March 07, 2008, 07:29:18 PM
OK, getting to Page 50 and Cage change.

I don't think anyone went to The Netherlands other than Anita.  She must have mistakenly thought Paulus could handle things for a week.  Wrongo Bongo!
.

I think she took the other two boys with her because she knew how violent Joran was towards them and she didn't trust Paulus (the drunk, coke head) with her two youngest.

PAULUS = MURDERER.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 - 3/7/08
Post by: JE on March 07, 2008, 07:30:18 PM
Who is Jules D. The only Jules D i know of is Jules Deelder a well know public figure in Holland. Always dresses in black and has the unofficial title of Night Mayor of Rotterdam. He is a writer poet tv personality etc.
I think this is a joke


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 - 3/7/08
Post by: klaasend on March 07, 2008, 07:31:03 PM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/1LOCKED.gif)

Please move to NCD# 741


http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2680.0


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 - 3/7/08
Post by: texasmom on March 07, 2008, 07:31:08 PM
Hi Everyone!

Has Jossy made any comment about the first part of the show?  If he has would someone direct me to it, please.  I've read some of the pieces of translations, I would really like to see a complete translation that is reliable.  Does one exist?  TIA


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 -
Post by: Observer on March 07, 2008, 07:31:11 PM


The ale thru one shoe away after they gathered it as evidence and Joran lied about the other lost shoe stating the incorrect size so that nobody would find it and think it was his, since Natalee's DNA was on it.

Is there any documents that say ALE found a shoe or shoes in the first place?
[/quote]
You can't trust any of the work Dennis Jacobs and Van Der Straten did! The best friend was running the investigation and the other was collecting all the evidence..Both of them are crooked as hell!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #740 3/5 - 3/7/08
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 07, 2008, 07:32:08 PM
VALENTIJN AND SEBASTIAN VAN DER SLOOT

Paulus Van der Sloot
Witness Statement
June 18, 2005


On May 29th 2005, at approximately 16.00 hours, I went with Joran to the “Free Carribean Stud Tournament” in the Holiday Inn. During the break, at approximately 18.30 hours, I went back home.  My youngest son Sebastian who was playing at a friends house was due to be dropped off at home around that time. Joran, with my permission, took over my seat because he had been eliminated earlier.


Paulus van der Sloot
Suspect Statement
June 23, 2005


I woke up Valentijn and Sebastian and I also said to Joran that he
had to go to school even though he wasn't in the mood to go.


Paulus Van der Sloot
Witness Statement
June 18, 2005


On May 30th in the hours of the morning, I did not notice anything different/out of the ordinary with Joran. According to me he got onto the bus of the I.S.A. with his brothers Sebastian and Valentijn just like he always does. I am not absolutely sure about that because I didn't notice it and because Joran didn't have to be at school every day during that period. He was busy with his final exams and sometimes he stayed home.


Paulus van der Sloot
Suspect Statement
June 23, 2005


To your question whether Sebastian and Valentijn went to school that Monday, I can state the following. Yes, they got onto the bus and went to school because in the period that Anita was away they took the bus every day.


Paulus van der Sloot
Witness Statement
June 18, 2005


At some point during the night I was awoken by the barking of the dogs. My son Valentijn came to me and asked me what was happening. There were a lot of people at the door and there was also a police-patrol.


Paulus van der Sloot
Suspect Statement
June 23, 2005


To your question how it then is possible that I had not seen Joran
get onto the bus, I can state the following. Of course I see the children get onto the bus and that also is true for Joran. But unlike Valentijn and Sebastian who went with the bus everyday Joran didn't go with the bus once or twice during that period.


Paulus van der Sloot
Suspect Statement
June 25, 2005


We spoke last time about that Monday night when Joran was at the "Raquet Club", that I only took the bag with me. I am remembering that it was around 08:00pm when I took the bag to Joran at the “Raquet Club”, this was when Joran was walking in the direction of the Marriott and made the announcement that he was going to participate in the “Free Tournament” at the Wyndham that this came up. In my view I even grumbled (expressed concern) on Joran and then went on to pick up Sebastian at the ZEOLA family.


Joran van der Sloot
Suspect Statement
June 9, 2005


When it was half time of the game my father wanted to go home to go and babysit my ten year old brother.


Anita van der Sloot
On the Record w/ Greta
June 23, 2005


ANITA VAN DER SLOOT: He's very quiet. He's very shy. He doesn't like media coverage at all. And he's very much hurt by things that are happening. And as I look back — I mean, I came back from Holland Wednesday, and I was so surprised at seeing three young men — one kid, two men — involved, maybe, in the disappearance of a girl ...