Scared Monkeys Discussion Forum

Natalee Holloway => LCD Archive => Topic started by: klaasend on March 10, 2008, 01:42:46 AM



Title: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: klaasend on March 10, 2008, 01:42:46 AM
http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/Natalee2.swf


JUSTICE FOR NATALEE


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: bleachedblack on March 10, 2008, 03:39:45 PM
 ::MonkeyTongue::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: hotping on March 10, 2008, 03:49:50 PM
 ::MonkeyTongue:: ::MonkeyTongue::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Observer on March 10, 2008, 03:50:22 PM
Sure would be nice if we could confirm this is fact and this is the same reality at BNH!

posts from the Major Wager forum:

07-16-2005, 01:31 AM
shoebox
Two Star General Join Date: Aug 2000


Clev, I was offered a job there in 1999, the guy is from Chicago and his 1st name is Mike, I wont put the last name on here.
I thought he was a decent guy but I never took the offer, I believe Reality knows him well. He owns the casino itself which is totally seperate from the Holiday Inn(Excelsior Casino), it has a walk up sportsbook and racebook, Poker Room and all the table games, I always stay there when i go.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by Clevfan at the Major Wager forum:

07-03-2005, 03:30 AM
clevfan
Staff Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 17,627


these are suspect sites:

www.mrpinkproductions.com

www.guide2paradise.com


both are run by a guy orginally from michigan by the name of paul brough. he is good friends with lorenzo van rijn

old sites are: www.getlegalhookers.com and www.metronightlife.com


http://tinyurl.com/29uuob
======================================
glad you brought up the majorwager forum again. i was looking through that this afternoon and saw that acw posted that paulus and the judge were golfing buddies. i don't remember that ever coming out.

http://www.majorwager.com/forums/mess-hall/44196-anyone-else-following-natalee-holloway-case-6.html (http://www.majorwager.com/forums/mess-hall/44196-anyone-else-following-natalee-holloway-case-6.html)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: bleachedblack on March 10, 2008, 03:58:07 PM
Sure would be nice if we could confirm this is fact and this is the same reality at BNH!

posts from the Major Wager forum:

07-16-2005, 01:31 AM
shoebox
Two Star General Join Date: Aug 2000


Clev, I was offered a job there in 1999, the guy is from Chicago and his 1st name is Mike, I wont put the last name on here.
I thought he was a decent guy but I never took the offer, I believe Reality knows him well. He owns the casino itself which is totally seperate from the Holiday Inn(Excelsior Casino), it has a walk up sportsbook and racebook, Poker Room and all the table games, I always stay there when i go.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by Clevfan at the Major Wager forum:

07-03-2005, 03:30 AM
clevfan
Staff Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 17,627


these are suspect sites:

www.mrpinkproductions.com

www.guide2paradise.com


both are run by a guy orginally from michigan by the name of paul brough. he is good friends with lorenzo van rijn

old sites are: www.getlegalhookers.com and www.metronightlife.com


http://tinyurl.com/29uuob
======================================
glad you brought up the majorwager forum again. i was looking through that this afternoon and saw that acw posted that paulus and the judge were golfing buddies. i don't remember that ever coming out.

http://www.majorwager.com/forums/mess-hall/44196-anyone-else-following-natalee-holloway-case-6.html (http://www.majorwager.com/forums/mess-hall/44196-anyone-else-following-natalee-holloway-case-6.html)

I recall that poster clevfan, typepad appeareded with their name on it at majorwajor site and they were an early poster her at SM.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Observer on March 10, 2008, 04:02:07 PM
That doesn't suprise me Mojo..I bet PVDS knew Nit Wit and Smit fairly well. PVDS was a replacement Judge and his connections are pretty deep in the OM and the Govt of Aruba.

What is curious to me was if he just learned he was a failure on May 29th 2005 after returning from Holland. Anita was away and he appears to be getting hammered and gambling at the casino. Just how deep is his involvement? Why would Michael Posner be so angry releasing the casino tapes? Joran told that reporter in Holland that he and Natalee went inside the house for a while after the bar and Deepak stated that PVDS was not sleeping in his bedroom..Are they clues to what happened? Did they spend a hour at the VDS house and leave?

Was the plan to drop her off at the beach at 3AM when something horrible happened? Just what is Mr.Pinks and Lorenzo Van Rijn's involvement if any? That would be quite interesting if it was true they are good friends. Also interesting if this Reality is the same one at BNH and is connected to Michael Posner.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Peaches on March 10, 2008, 04:02:19 PM
Present and accounted for. 

Some of those clevfan posts looked familiar..... interesting stuff.....BBL


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 10, 2008, 04:03:51 PM
vms ... I see you lurking.

"The Last Boleyn Girl" was an excellent movie.  IMO.

 ::MonkeyDance::

Thanks for forewarning me regarding the title.  I had anticipated a spy thriller with a German location when I had misunderstood from my friend with a Scotish accent that the title of the movie was "The Berlin Girl".

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Anyways the lesson in British history ... my heritage ... was very interesting.

Janet







Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: katrien on March 10, 2008, 04:10:50 PM
That doesn't suprise me Mojo..I bet PVDS knew Nit Wit and Smit fairly well. PVDS was a replacement Judge and his connections are pretty deep in the OM and the Govt of Aruba.

What is curious to me was if he just learned he was a failure on May 29th 2005 after returning from Holland. Anita was away and he appears to be getting hammered and gambling at the casino. Just how deep is his involvement? Why would Michael Posner be so angry releasing the casino tapes? Joran told that reporter in Holland that he and Natalee went inside the house for a while after the bar and Deepak stated that PVDS was not sleeping in his bedroom..Are they clues to what happened? Did they spend a hour at the VDS house and leave?

Was the plan to drop her off at the beach at 3AM when something horrible happened? Just what is Mr.Pinks and Lorenzo Van Rijn's involvement if any? That would be quite interesting if it was true they are good friends. Also interesting if this Reality is the same one at BNH and is connected to Michael Posner.

Did Deepak stated that PvdS was not sleeping in his bedroom?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: vms on March 10, 2008, 04:18:30 PM
vms ... I see you lurking.

"The Last Boleyn Girl" was an excellent movie.  IMO.

 ::MonkeyDance::

Thanks for forewarning me regarding the title.  I had anticipated a spy thriller with a German location when I had misunderstood from my friend with a Scotish accent that the title of the movie was "The Berlin Girl".

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Anyways the lesson in British history ... my heritage ... was very interesting.

Janet







Thanks, Janet! I am glad you enjoyed it.

Now I have to decide theater or DVD.  :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 10, 2008, 04:25:36 PM
vms ... I see you lurking.

"The Last Boleyn Girl" was an excellent movie.  IMO.

 ::MonkeyDance::

Thanks for forewarning me regarding the title.  I had anticipated a spy thriller with a German location when I had misunderstood from my friend with a Scotish accent that the title of the movie was "The Berlin Girl".

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Anyways the lesson in British history ... my heritage ... was very interesting.

Janet


Thanks, Janet! I am glad you enjoyed it.

Now I have to decide theater or DVD.  :lol:

The spactaculor scenery along dictates that viewing at least once at the theater is where it is at.

Janet.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 10, 2008, 04:26:34 PM
If it had not been for Paulus' influencial connections in Holland and Aruba ... justice would have prevailed for Natalee Holloway from the getgo ... the family would have been spared almost three years of a H--- on Earth and ... except in the hearts of her family and friends ... a missing 18 year old American citizen who did not return home from an Aruban vacation would now be a distance memory.

Janet

+++++++++++++++
 
Jossy Mansur
NANCY GRACE
October 4, 2005


GRACE: … Jossy, regarding the connection, what I perceived to be a close connection between the judge, Paulus Van Der Sloot and the retired chief of police who initially handled Natalee`s case, Van Der Stratten, were they friends?

MANSUR: Of course, they were friends. It stands to reason they were friends because Paul Van Der Sloot had many friends within the police department; he had many friends within the Department of Justice. And he had many friends with -- and he was friendly with all the judges in Aruba. He worked out of the same office as they did and did the same work.

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0510/04/ng.01.html


Paulus van der Sloot
NOVA (Twan Huys)
June 28, 2005


JUDICIARY

Reporter (Twan Huys): Which function do you have here at the island? Because many stories go around about that. What is your function?
 
Paulus van der Sloot: I am a replacing member of the joint court of justice of the Netherlands Antilles and Aruba [1] and I am appointed for a period of three years, from January the first, 2003, until January the first, 2006.
 
Reporter (Twan Huys): So, you are replacement judge?
 
Paulus van der Sloot: Yes.


PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE
 
Reporter (Twan Huys): Do you know the people very well, for example, the people here from the public prosecutors' office that ordered your detention?

Paulus van der Sloot: Yes, for sure, because, before that, I have worked for eight years as chief of the cabinet of the prosecutor general [2].

Reporter (Twan Huys): So, you also know the current prosecutor general?
 
Paulus van der Sloot: Yes.
 
Reporter (Twan Huys): Mrs. Croes.
 
Paulus van der Sloot: Yes.


ARUBAN LAW ENFORCEMENT

Reporter (Twan Huys): Yes, and what does that mean when your colleagues stop by to arrest you?

Paulus van der Sloot: That gives a feeling of absurdity. It is indeed almost unimaginable that by someone you actually know very well, where you worked together with for a long time, that that one comes to tell you that you are suspected of complicity to murder.

Reporter (Twan Huys): Who was that in your case?

Paulus van der Sloot: That was, in this case, that was the leader of the team of police commissioners.
 
Reporter (Twan Huys): Jan van der Straaten.

Paulus van der Sloot: That was Jan van der Straaten, yes.
 
Reporter (Twan Huys): And you know each other very well?

Paulus van der Sloot: Yes.

Translation Credit: Dugo - Riehl Worldview


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: vms on March 10, 2008, 04:32:30 PM
vms ... I see you lurking.

"The Last Boleyn Girl" was an excellent movie.  IMO.

 ::MonkeyDance::

Thanks for forewarning me regarding the title.  I had anticipated a spy thriller with a German location when I had misunderstood from my friend with a Scotish accent that the title of the movie was "The Berlin Girl".

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Anyways the lesson in British history ... my heritage ... was very interesting.

Janet


Thanks, Janet! I am glad you enjoyed it.

Now I have to decide theater or DVD.  :lol:

The spactaculor scenery along dictates that viewing at least once at the theater is where it is at.

Janet.

OK, TY!

I waited for the Elizabeth: The Golden Age DVD and regretted that I did not see it in the theater for that exact reason.
Sorry for the O/T everyone.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Observer on March 10, 2008, 04:39:23 PM

Did Deepak stated that PvdS was not sleeping in his bedroom?
Can't find it at the moment but I thought I read that PVDS was sleeping in the main house or somewhere where he normally did not sleep.

Satish statement

6/11/05
The father of Joran at that moment was sleeping inside the house


Deepak Statements
6/11/05
To your question whether Joran could have been involved with a rape some time before, I can say the following. I do not know. My brother told me once that a girl had said that she had been impregnated by Joran. I do not know what happened after that.

6/13/05

We then went to Joran's room because Joran's dad wanted to talk to us so we sat down on the floor, because Joran's mattresses were on the floor in his room. Joran's father said to us, see boys what kind of problems this had caused. Then he asked us what we had learned from this. I answered, never offer someone a ride. Joran agreed with me.

6/16/05

To your question whether I can state anything about the case of the missing girl, I can say the following. Joran had made up the story that there were traces of blood in my car. My car was ripped open by the police and one could see that was this was a lie. Now he is telling a story about how the police should look into it that I always have money. I have a job and get an allowance from my parents. I am not Joran who steals money from his parents. And I am of the opinion that, that this is not the issue at this moment. If you want to find out what happened to the girl and where she is, you have to be with Joran van der SLOOT Joran van der SLOOT is a sick person, he has admitted that he is in the care of a psychologist and that he hits his brother. If the police want more information about Natalee, then you have to be with Joran. He was the last person with the girl, that I can guarantee.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Tater on March 10, 2008, 04:47:11 PM
Hi Monkey's,
  Just got caught up reading.Watched the video link and listened to Dave and Beth.Seem's Dave thinks it all went down at the Sloots house..Bless his heart and Beth's heart too..One thing I've always wondered about and that is why Dave had to find out from his son that Natalee was missing.I wonder why Beth or Jug didn't call him immediatly..I don't know,just sad...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Magnolia on March 10, 2008, 04:52:17 PM
*******,
I do believe that Walter Brentt Posner is Michael's son.
I think the article that you posted states that he
has no children with his current wife..though not clearly stated.

Michael Posner is a businessman and casino owner in Aruba. Posner is the owner of the Excelsior, Holiday Inn and Grand Holiday Casinos.

On September 20 2005, MSNBCtelevision news journalist Rita Cosby interviewed an FBI agent who identified Posner as a convicted felon with alleged organized crime ties. Posner's casino, the Excelsior, has been implicated in the Natalee Holloway disappearance. He is currently married with no children to Robin Abergel.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 10, 2008, 04:55:57 PM
Hi Monkey's,
  Just got caught up reading.Watched the video link and listened to Dave and Beth.Seem's Dave thinks it all went down at the Sloots house..Bless his heart and Beth's heart too..One thing I've always wondered about and that is why Dave had to find out from his son that Natalee was missing.I wonder why Beth or Jug didn't call him immediatly..I don't know,just sad...

Tot ... at this point Beth knew NOTHING

Dave Holloway
Corruption in Paradise

Page 6
On Money, May 30, Natalee's trip came to an end, and she was due to fly home to Alabama.  But late in the afternoon, I received a call from Matt telling me that Ntalee had missed her flight and that Beth wasgetting on a plane to Aruba.  She had told him to call me, but had no details yet.  I attempted to get in touch with Beth.  No answer.  I googled hotels in Aruba and found a number for the Holiday Inn where the kids had been styaying. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 10, 2008, 05:01:56 PM
Hi Monkey's,
  Just got caught up reading.Watched the video link and listened to Dave and Beth.Seem's Dave thinks it all went down at the Sloots house..Bless his heart and Beth's heart too..One thing I've always wondered about and that is why Dave had to find out from his son that Natalee was missing.I wonder why Beth or Jug didn't call him immediatly..I don't know,just sad...


Tot ... at this point Beth knew NOTHING other than what her mother's instinct told her ... SOMETHING WAS TERRIBLY WRONG ... HER DAUGHTER HAD MISSED THE FLIGHT HOME!

Janet.

++++++++++

Dave Holloway
Corruption in Paradise

Page 6

On Monday, May 30, Natalee's trip came to an end, and she was due to fly home to Alabama.  But late in the afternoon, I received a call from Matt telling me that Natalee had missed her flight and that Beth was getting on a plane to Aruba.  She had told him to call me, but had no details yet.   I attempted to get in touch with Beth.  No answer.  I googled hotels in Aruba and found a number for the Holiday Inn where the kids had been staying.  I called and was able to talk to one of the trip chaperones who had stayed behind in Natalee's room.  He filled me in about Natalee missing her flight.  At the time, there was not much to go on.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: katrien on March 10, 2008, 05:04:36 PM
Quote
6/16/05

To your question whether I can state anything about the case of the missing girl, I can say the following. Joran had made up the story that there were traces of blood in my car. My car was ripped open by the police and one could see that was this was a lie. Now he is telling a story about how the police should look into it that I always have money. I have a job and get an allowance from my parents. I am not Joran who steals money from his parents. And I am of the opinion that, that this is not the issue at this moment. If you want to find out what happened to the girl and where she is, you have to be with Joran van der SLOOT Joran van der SLOOT is a sick person, he has admitted that he is in the care of a psychologist and that he hits his brother. If the police want more information about Natalee, then you have to be with Joran. He was the last person with the girl, that I can guarantee
.

Weird. Johan555 writes strange things on Fok in the first Nathalee rebound chapter.::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Observer on March 10, 2008, 05:07:34 PM
*******,
I do believe that Walter Brentt Posner is Michael's son.
I think the article that you posted states that he
has no children with his current wife..though not clearly stated.

Michael Posner is a businessman and casino owner in Aruba. Posner is the owner of the Excelsior, Holiday Inn and Grand Holiday Casinos.

On September 20 2005, MSNBCtelevision news journalist Rita Cosby interviewed an FBI agent who identified Posner as a convicted felon with alleged organized crime ties. Posner's casino, the Excelsior, has been implicated in the Natalee Holloway disappearance. He is currently married with no children to Robin Abergel.


I think your right as I see his name is listed as Michael William Posner: It say's he is 67 years old


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: dennisintn on March 10, 2008, 05:11:27 PM
Quote
6/16/05

To your question whether I can state anything about the case of the missing girl, I can say the following. Joran had made up the story that there were traces of blood in my car. My car was ripped open by the police and one could see that was this was a lie. Now he is telling a story about how the police should look into it that I always have money. I have a job and get an allowance from my parents. I am not Joran who steals money from his parents. And I am of the opinion that, that this is not the issue at this moment. If you want to find out what happened to the girl and where she is, you have to be with Joran van der SLOOT Joran van der SLOOT is a sick person, he has admitted that he is in the care of a psychologist and that he hits his brother. If the police want more information about Natalee, then you have to be with Joran. He was the last person with the girl, that I can guarantee
.

Weird. Johan555 writes strange things on Fok in the first Nathalee rebound chapter.::MonkeyCool::


katrien, what kind of strange things?  or give us a link.  lol, don't make us come over there, child.
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: mojo on March 10, 2008, 05:17:45 PM
That doesn't suprise me Mojo..I bet PVDS knew Nit Wit and Smit fairly well. PVDS was a replacement Judge and his connections are pretty deep in the OM and the Govt of Aruba.

What is curious to me was if he just learned he was a failure on May 29th 2005 after returning from Holland. Anita was away and he appears to be getting hammered and gambling at the casino. Just how deep is his involvement? Why would Michael Posner be so angry releasing the casino tapes? Joran told that reporter in Holland that he and Natalee went inside the house for a while after the bar and Deepak stated that PVDS was not sleeping in his bedroom..Are they clues to what happened? Did they spend a hour at the VDS house and leave?

Was the plan to drop her off at the beach at 3AM when something horrible happened? Just what is Mr.Pinks and Lorenzo Van Rijn's involvement if any? That would be quite interesting if it was true they are good friends. Also interesting if this Reality is the same one at BNH and is connected to Michael Posner.

i didn't surprise me on the one hand, but i was surprised it never really came out. also, earlier you posted something about the dog incident and it mentioned a merryweather. i suspect this may be sidney merryweather. similar age, wonder if we can somehow verify the dog thing.

http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=107036794 (http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=107036794)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on March 10, 2008, 05:21:07 PM
Monday, March 10, 2008 14:15
Netherlands gets first book Van der Eem

translated link....

http://64.233.179.104/translate_c?hl=en&u=http://www.elsevier.nl/nieuws/laatste_24_uur/artikel/asp/artnr/196514/index.html&prev=/search%3Fq%3DPoentje%2BCastro%2B-Fidel%26start%3D30%26num%3D30%26hl%3Den%26newwindow%3D1%26sa%3DN



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 10, 2008, 05:25:07 PM
Quote
6/16/05

To your question whether I can state anything about the case of the missing girl, I can say the following. Joran had made up the story that there were traces of blood in my car. My car was ripped open by the police and one could see that was this was a lie. Now he is telling a story about how the police should look into it that I always have money. I have a job and get an allowance from my parents. I am not Joran who steals money from his parents. And I am of the opinion that, that this is not the issue at this moment. If you want to find out what happened to the girl and where she is, you have to be with Joran van der SLOOT Joran van der SLOOT is a sick person, he has admitted that he is in the care of a psychologist and that he hits his brother. If the police want more information about Natalee, then you have to be with Joran. He was the last person with the girl, that I can guarantee
.

Weird. Johan555 writes strange things on Fok in the first Nathalee rebound chapter.::MonkeyCool::


The above quote comprises part of Deepak's suspect statement of June 16, 2005.

Janet

++++++++++


Klaasend

DEEPAK - 6/16/2005 STATEMENT
« on: August 10, 2006, 04:05:20 AM »


http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=185.msg32326;topicseen#msg32326


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: katrien on March 10, 2008, 05:31:40 PM
Quote
6/16/05

To your question whether I can state anything about the case of the missing girl, I can say the following. Joran had made up the story that there were traces of blood in my car. My car was ripped open by the police and one could see that was this was a lie. Now he is telling a story about how the police should look into it that I always have money. I have a job and get an allowance from my parents. I am not Joran who steals money from his parents. And I am of the opinion that, that this is not the issue at this moment. If you want to find out what happened to the girl and where she is, you have to be with Joran van der SLOOT Joran van der SLOOT is a sick person, he has admitted that he is in the care of a psychologist and that he hits his brother. If the police want more information about Natalee, then you have to be with Joran. He was the last person with the girl, that I can guarantee
.

Weird. Johan555 writes strange things on Fok in the first Nathalee rebound chapter.::MonkeyCool::


katrien, what kind of strange things?  or give us a link.  lol, don't make us come over there, child.
dennisintn

I'll give a link tomorrow evening.
******* knows all about it, I will link (or copy) the posts in the Dutch thread. I think it is old news for you people anyway.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Tater on March 10, 2008, 05:31:45 PM
Hi Monkey's,
  Just got caught up reading.Watched the video link and listened to Dave and Beth.Seem's Dave thinks it all went down at the Sloots house..Bless his heart and Beth's heart too..One thing I've always wondered about and that is why Dave had to find out from his son that Natalee was missing.I wonder why Beth or Jug didn't call him immediatly..I don't know,just sad...


Tot ... at this point Beth knew NOTHING other than what her mother's instinct told her ... SOMETHING WAS TERRIBLY WRONG ... HER DAUGHTER HAD MISSED THE FLIGHT HOME!

Janet.

++++++++++

Dave Holloway
Corruption in Paradise

Page 6

On Monday, May 30, Natalee's trip came to an end, and she was due to fly home to Alabama.  But late in the afternoon, I received a call from Matt telling me that Natalee had missed her flight and that Beth was getting on a plane to Aruba.  She had told him to call me, but had no details yet.   I attempted to get in touch with Beth.  No answer.  I googled hotels in Aruba and found a number for the Holiday Inn where the kids had been staying.  I called and was able to talk to one of the trip chaperones who had stayed behind in Natalee's room.  He filled me in about Natalee missing her flight.  At the time, there was not much to go on.


Thankyou Janet for the answer..Beth's instinct told her something was wrong with Natalee in Aruba.Dave's instinct told him it wasn't a good idea for Natalee to go to Aruba to begin with..It's very obvious that these two parents loved that child deeply as we see now,they were both right..God Bless them...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on March 10, 2008, 05:33:55 PM
Monday, March 10, 2008 14:15
Netherlands gets first book Van der Eem

translated link....

http://64.233.179.104/translate_c?hl=en&u=http://www.elsevier.nl/nieuws/laatste_24_uur/artikel/asp/artnr/196514/index.html&prev=/search%3Fq%3DPoentje%2BCastro%2B-Fidel%26start%3D30%26num%3D30%26hl%3Den%26newwindow%3D1%26sa%3DN



or dutch
http://www.elsevier.nl/nieuws/laatste_24_uur/artikel/asp/artnr/196514/index.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Observer on March 10, 2008, 05:34:04 PM

i didn't surprise me on the one hand, but i was surprised it never really came out. also, earlier you posted something about the dog incident and it mentioned a merryweather. i suspect this may be sidney merryweather. similar age, wonder if we can somehow verify the dog thing.

http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=107036794 (http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=107036794)
Well the entire Van Der Sloot and Hugen Family has been quiet,we don't even know which ones are paul's brothers or why him and his son are so protected. They know the names of all of Dave's kids,every MB student and everything about Natalee and her Family. Very little has come out for obvious reasons as we know years ago Van Der Straten use to work for PVDS,the more thats unraveled the more disgusted we will all be by how well he knows everyone that was involved. It is probably true with the two Judges Wit and Smit as well. It would not suprise me if other Fathers of the pimps influenced the Investigation in Aruba also.

Peter De Vries also reported about Joran killing his own dog in his first show and I take it as a fact. He killed his own pet dumped it in the Moko pond and tried to blame it on this kid. However there probably is no police record of that thanks to Van Der Straten and Pauls friends in the ALE. We saw a similar thing from the reports of the 3 girls who said they were drugged and assaulted by Joran,they went to the police and nothing was done. They came forward again after Natalee dissapeared but then  stepped back after Dennis Jacobs talked to them. When the KLPD looked into this,her Psychiatrist said that she was drugged and abused by Joran,but Dennis Jacobs said she was not willing to come forward because she was still in love with Joran  ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: mojo on March 10, 2008, 05:40:13 PM
she was still in love with Joran  ::MonkeyNoNo::

on drugs maybe, otherwise...  ::MonkeyNoNo:: in love with joran....who is she lilly munster? i wish devries would dig around on jacobs and van der stratten.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 10, 2008, 05:56:46 PM
AMERICAN WRITER - E.E. BYARS

Writer Byars (33) helped with some translation for Peter R. de Vries's broadcast on the Holloway case, which is how she met Van der Eem. Until now she has only written fiction but expects that the book on the Holloway case, entitled Disposed, should be in American bookstores in September.

http://www.expatica.com/nl/articles/news/Aruban-justice-authorities-want-to-question-Van-der-Eem-.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Magnolia on March 10, 2008, 06:00:06 PM

i didn't surprise me on the one hand, but i was surprised it never really came out. also, earlier you posted something about the dog incident and it mentioned a merryweather. i suspect this may be sidney merryweather. similar age, wonder if we can somehow verify the dog thing.

http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=107036794 (http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=107036794)
Well the entire Van Der Sloot and Hugen Family has been quiet,we don't even know which ones are paul's brothers or why him and his son are so protected. They know the names of all of Dave's kids,every MB student and everything about Natalee and her Family. Very little has come out for obvious reasons as we know years ago Van Der Straten use to work for PVDS,the more thats unraveled the more disgusted we will all be by how well he knows everyone that was involved. It is probably true with the two Judges Wit and Smit as well. It would not suprise me if other Fathers of the pimps influenced the Investigation in Aruba also.

Peter De Vries also reported about Joran killing his own dog in his first show and I take it as a fact. He killed his own pet dumped it in the Moko pond and tried to blame it on this kid. However there probably is no police record of that thanks to Van Der Straten and Pauls friends in the ALE. We saw a similar thing from the reports of the 3 girls who said they were drugged and assaulted by Joran,they went to the police and nothing was done. They came forward again after Natalee dissapeared but then  stepped back after Dennis Jacobs talked to them. When the KLPD looked into this,her Psychiatrist said that she was drugged and abused by Joran,but Dennis Jacobs said she was not willing to come forward because she was still in love with Joran  ::MonkeyNoNo::

Arubagirl first told us about Joran killing his dog.  The Merrywether mother had told
Arubagirl's mother the story.  Some sort of relative as I recall.  Hubie Merrywether was
the father of the boy.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 10, 2008, 06:40:45 PM
Posted by Lazlo at RU:

Uitgeverij Foreign Media Books laat maandag weten dat 'Overboord. Hoe ik Joran van der Sloot aan het praten kreeg' rond 25 juni verschijnt.

Publisher Foreign Media Books announced Monday that 'Overboard. How I got Joran van der Sloot to talk' will be published June 25.

http://www.planet.nl/planet/show/id=62967/contentid=917917/sc=5e16df


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Tater on March 10, 2008, 06:52:44 PM
Posted by Lazlo at RU:

Uitgeverij Foreign Media Books laat maandag weten dat 'Overboord. Hoe ik Joran van der Sloot aan het praten kreeg' rond 25 juni verschijnt.

Publisher Foreign Media Books announced Monday that 'Overboard. How I got Joran van der Sloot to talk' will be published June 25.

http://www.planet.nl/planet/show/id=62967/contentid=917917/sc=5e16df

I won't be buying...Until it reads,"How I brought down the corruption in Aruba and made the guilty pay", I want none of it....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 10, 2008, 06:59:00 PM
Monday, March 10, 2008 14:15
Netherlands gets first book Van der Eem

translated link....

http://64.233.179.104/translate_c?hl=en&u=http://www.elsevier.nl/nieuws/laatste_24_uur/artikel/asp/artnr/196514/index.html&prev=/search%3Fq%3DPoentje%2BCastro%2B-Fidel%26start%3D30%26num%3D30%26hl%3Den%26newwindow%3D1%26sa%3DN


or dutch
http://www.elsevier.nl/nieuws/laatste_24_uur/artikel/asp/artnr/196514/index.html

Thanks Nut.

The Dutch are privy to Patrick van der Eem's book at the end of June while ... it appears that the English version will not be be released until September.

Janet



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: hotping on March 10, 2008, 07:22:06 PM
I thought I understood that there will be 2 books by Patrick one is Disposed and the other is Overboard....please correct Me if I'm wrong... ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 10, 2008, 07:24:23 PM
Posted by Lazlo at RU:

Uitgeverij Foreign Media Books laat maandag weten dat 'Overboord. Hoe ik Joran van der Sloot aan het praten kreeg' rond 25 juni verschijnt.

Publisher Foreign Media Books announced Monday that 'Overboard. How I got Joran van der Sloot to talk' will be published June 25.

http://www.planet.nl/planet/show/id=62967/contentid=917917/sc=5e16df

I won't be buying...Until it reads,"How I brought down the corruption in Aruba and made the guilty pay", I want none of it....

Tot ... you and I have the same mindset.

I cannot comprehend how Peter Devries and Patrick van der Eem can claim that they solved the case.  I do not believe that the Devries/van der Eem investigation alluded to the specific participation of Paulus van der Sloot ... Deepak and Satish Kalpoe ... the sons of the elite (pimps).  I do not believe that the Devries/van der Eem investigation alluded to those within the Aruban and Dutch administrations/judiciary who were involved in/aware of the coverup that has been denying Natalee Holloway justice from the getgo.

All the video recording did was adhere to an Aruban agenda to pacify the family of Natalee Holloway by implicating ONLY Joran in being present at the demise of Natalee Holloway but not ... implicate him in her death.  However ... the encompassing lies which could be affirmed would dictate that Joran van der Sloot would not be detained.

Janet

++++++++++++++++++++


February 15, 2008

Court of Appeal upholds lower judge’s decision not to detain J.v.d.S.

J.v.d.S remains prime suspect
Judicial investigation continues


The Court of Appeal announced by the end of yesterday, February 14th, 2008, its decision to uphold the refusal by the investigating judge to order pre-trial detention of J.v.d.S. in the case of the disappearance of Natalee Holloway. The Office of the Public Prosecutor had requested such an order after the “Peter R de Vries-tapes” had been received by the Office and had been evaluated. Last week the Office appealed the ruling of refusal by the judge.

The reasons underlying the Court’s decision are the following. The Court has seen the visual materials, has listened to the audio materials and has inspected the verbatim reports. Based on that, the Court is of the opinion that there is a lack of sufficient facts and circumstances substantiating serious grounds for the suspicion of the suspect’s involvement in the crimes for which he is being held responsible by the prosecution. The Court will generally be a bit more hesitant when it has to decide on a new request for pre-trial detention of a suspect, when that same suspect has been detained repeatedly before and there has been a considerable lapse of time.

J.v.d.S. has given extensive and detailed statements in Patrick van der Eem’s car, the undercover citizen who worked for Peter R. de Vries, on what happened during the night of the disappearance of Natalee Holloway. Nevertheless the Court sees various reasons not to accept the serious grounds of suspicion which are statutorily required for pre-trial detention. One of them is the history of contradictory statements by J.v.d.S., which were belied repeatedly by objective findings.

At this moment those parts of the statements made in Van der Eem’s car which contain new elements are not being underpinned by objective findings. Considering the possibility of a serious personality disorder – as voiced by the prosecution – combined with a personal history of untrue statements and remarks, which even according to the suspect himself are frequently false, the Court of Appeal has reasons for doubt regarding the incriminating character of the “car-statements.”

On the pre-trial detention issue the Code of criminal procedure does not provide for further appeals. The effect of the Court decision is that J.v.d.S. cannot be (re)arrested. The investigation of the Natalee Holloway case continues. J.v.d.S. is again the prime suspect.

At the end of the investigation the Office of the Public Prosecution will decide whether to charge or not



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: oceanexploration on March 10, 2008, 07:30:04 PM
I must with Dave that the Sloot residence played an important role.  What's the consensus here...

To what extent was the VDS residence used in NH's dissapearance?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Observer on March 10, 2008, 07:31:32 PM
Interesting to look at the islands yearbooks..Such a small class but yet so many with the same last name..Kock,Arendsz,Arends,Maduro..Croes..and yes Wever  ::MonkeyWink::

(http://i198.photobucket.com/albums/aa118/Observer00000007/1983-v21.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Observer on March 10, 2008, 07:33:46 PM
I must with Dave that the Sloot residence played an important role.  What's the consensus here...

To what extent was the VDS residence used in NH's dissapearance?
Hard to say as to what extent OE..But since Karin Janssen,Judge Wit and Gerald Dompig are all caught lying why they blocked the search of the home and refused to let it be searched..One has to wonder why? They had a full search warrant 16 days after Natalee dissapeared but still blocked the search the day of the search..Why would they do that? Why would the Judge say they never asked to search that property anymore then Jorans Apt but the Chief Prosecuter and Deputy commissioner say they were denied,they said they were also denied when Paul Van Der Sloot was arrested for Pre-Meditated Murder and Kidnapping..Why would the Judge say Dompig obstructed Justice and didn't want that house searched so PVDS could have his privacy? Since when do Murder and Kidnapping suspects get immunity from having there house searched? We know they tried to frame two innocent men and they immediately searched there house! What was Peter R reporting that something happened in the garden in 2006? Yet in 2007 that is exactly where the KLPD forensic team focused there search on.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: oceanexploration on March 10, 2008, 07:34:25 PM
The Persistence is completing its last leg of the journey home.  It should arrive some time on Wed.  Incredibly, the Persistence never saw anything over 4ft seas the entire way from Aruba to Mexico with 2kt currents and the wind at its stern - it made awesome time.  It had to spend a few days in Mexico where it refueled until the Gulf calmed down, but it's good to go now.  Thanks for all the prayers. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: San on March 10, 2008, 07:35:32 PM
I must with Dave that the Sloot residence played an important role.  What's the consensus here...

To what extent was the VDS residence used in NH's dissapearance?

Short and to the point.  Natalee was raped and murdered at the Sloots.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Pita on March 10, 2008, 07:35:32 PM

i didn't surprise me on the one hand, but i was surprised it never really came out. also, earlier you posted something about the dog incident and it mentioned a merryweather. i suspect this may be sidney merryweather. similar age, wonder if we can somehow verify the dog thing.

http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=107036794 (http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=107036794)
Well the entire Van Der Sloot and Hugen Family has been quiet,we don't even know which ones are paul's brothers or why him and his son are so protected. They know the names of all of Dave's kids,every MB student and everything about Natalee and her Family. Very little has come out for obvious reasons as we know years ago Van Der Straten use to work for PVDS,the more thats unraveled the more disgusted we will all be by how well he knows everyone that was involved. It is probably true with the two Judges Wit and Smit as well. It would not suprise me if other Fathers of the pimps influenced the Investigation in Aruba also.

Peter De Vries also reported about Joran killing his own dog in his first show and I take it as a fact. He killed his own pet dumped it in the Moko pond and tried to blame it on this kid. However there probably is no police record of that thanks to Van Der Straten and Pauls friends in the ALE. We saw a similar thing from the reports of the 3 girls who said they were drugged and assaulted by Joran,they went to the police and nothing was done. They came forward again after Natalee dissapeared but then  stepped back after Dennis Jacobs talked to them. When the KLPD looked into this,her Psychiatrist said that she was drugged and abused by Joran,but Dennis Jacobs said she was not willing to come forward because she was still in love with Joran  ::MonkeyNoNo::

Arubagirl first told us about Joran killing his dog.  The Merrywether mother had told
Arubagirl's mother the story.  Some sort of relative as I recall.  Hubie Merrywether was
the father of the boy.

On July 12, 2005 identity “clevfan” of “Major Wager.com” reported: I know this is hearsay, but interesting story from a girl in Aruba regarding Joran:

Anyway, remember John Merryweather, evil incarnate and my mom's cousin? He has a son, named Herbert (Herbie) Merryweather. Herbert is married and has a son, but I don't know his name.

The mother of this son came to talk to my mom day before yesterday and it turns out that her son is a classmate of Joran's. So, got it, grandson Merryweather is Joran's classmate.

Turns out that that grandson and mom had a major clash with Joran some time before, because Joran accused grandson of killing Joran's dog and throwing it in Moko Dam (place where TX ES also searched), however, the mother threatened to go the cops to make a complaint against Joran,

and the Joran confessed to killing his own dog.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=188.20


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Blue Moon on March 10, 2008, 07:38:28 PM
I must with Dave that the Sloot residence played an important role.  What's the consensus here...

To what extent was the VDS residence used in NH's dissapearance?

The newly poured concrete right at the height of the disappearance is extremely suspect. I cannot imagine ANYONE suspected of murder, kidnapping, rape etc. in the U.S. being allowed to pour new concrete or having new furniture delivered to their home without being investigated and having the concrete dug up or the old furniture inspected and tested.  Guess I believe this is where it all started and it ended up at the beach with disposal in the ocean.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: bleachedblack on March 10, 2008, 07:39:17 PM
Dutchlady wrote:
If a person who takes someone has a home he takes that person to be isolated for his intentions. In all the cases of abductions of persons at nightclubs and at open places there is a foreplay of games as bait.

It also makes sense as sex is not an off- on switch with two in tow, it is a game set out before hand with more than one.

It is also the case that the beach was a later alibi as was the lighthouse one, as distancing from the home of Joran who had unlimited access. No kids shits on the beach if he has a bog at home. To graphic, then listen to kids of that age in school. No man or boy of over 16 would think of peeing in a gutter or laying in a tourism place as an alternative to his own drink parlour and bog. Yes, the words come as easily as other predators I have listened too, and what they do is tell a good story in their mind and regurtitate it. It takes a snake to catch a snake. The snake is not Joran, yes he has in my opinion lashed out at Natalee for some reason, but the duality of this is the repetition and stage management so that has to be a more older adult. He is procuring for someone else and simple bragging because he joins in on the action as a forensic cue from his own photos on the web.

I would like the person who dangles the web picture on Jorans site to again contact me, he is not wanting money, so it must be revenge. That person is trying to be a friend of the Holloways but is not. I urge that person to send me the website before Paulus took it down. That is the key to all this and why it had to be taken down as the pictures were going to be uploaded there untill something went drastically wrong in this roleplay is my making on the content and conditions of the actors behaviours exposed.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: bleachedblack on March 10, 2008, 07:41:03 PM
Maritza wrote 6/21;
I am a behavioural profiler who has and is tracing five missing persons, and in the past with language codes found the keys in television interviews of persons. These relayed to authorities may have, and were found to be accurate in the persons having these set patterns in conflict to the words stated.

In the case of Joran Van Der Sloot and what has been written. The following is revealed.

Joran Van Der Sloot at an age before 17, made a tape of a 14 year old girl being gang raped on the island with other members of this 'club on the island - that island was Aruba. The circulation is unknown, and not known if free circulation via his internet site, or the site of the internet cafe. Investigative agencies have a copy of those and that edition one would suppose, and the name of the victim.

Joran Van Der Sloot is credited with having anger management therapy. He is quoted by mothers as being a bully. He shows little respect for those lesser than him in size, parental wealth/status and more academic progress. He is not an 'arts' person, but a game player. His adrenalin high is on winning, and competative sports. He has to win, and having the parentage he has he is set to win at any cost. His money for gambling in casino's therefore is from 'where'?

His 'friends' on weblogs say he had sold the film of the gang rape, not given it. This if true is a crime, and one that if the parents knew is a crime he can be charged with as the hardcopy is on the drive of his computer, but more likely the internet cafe computer as parents can 'look down' at email messages on their computer as can police. Erased messages also can be taken by internet security consultants and also photographs.

Joran Van Der Sloot, his age is nearer to 18 as he says he is a LEO. So he will be 18 soon.Most of his male friends seem older than him, and not a racial bias. He has older friends with the same assets and lifestyle. His webpage shows many spelling errors as in ARNHEM, and wonder of his lucidity in making this page. Common words in neurological function of language can be affected by Wernicke-Korsakoffe confabulation, that is half truth/half fiction. Something that is prevalent in most deviants and sadists found who have personality disorders. It is also a condition in severe alcohol ingestion over time, and of course stroke, brain injury persons in the non alcoholic kind.

Joran Van Der Sloot's home page is his identity. The pages of the photos selected as his own cognitive state show how he wants to be seen. The devils horns and bar behind are scenes above his own age of 17 and status those he wishes to impress. These are girls, and he has to impress those older than him, not younger. Therefore in behavioural traits he is being narcissistic, egotistical, AOD and other drugs dependant in some form, and has to be central to all images of him as the 'sensation seeker' in his own mind. I wonder then of the phenomena of 'folie a deux' as in more than one as Master and apprentice, and if one is ellevated past this?

In the homepages in Holland it is said they think he is being framed. Rubbish, serial killers who have been sent the image of Joran with the neckstrap round the puny boys neck will comment if allowed on the mind of the person doing this. But without that reply I am saying that the photograph shows in body language his full frame as covering the photo and his shirt chosen for its association and his neural firing of AOD pupil reaction. The boy in this is acutely victimised shown by the eyes screwed up, palour and side view as sadism is shown, not playful sex bondage. He exhibits strangulation signs. Of all else, Joran shows no gay attributes, this shown is a victim, not a play act. The facial expression and loss of shirt expose the punyness and lack of identity in contrast to Joran's.

This person will and can be a witness, and I would speculate is from a none skilled, low socio economic family where he takes his bullying tendancies and anger pool from.

I would say abandonment rage is a symptom he displays and he has a rage in the home that is known as outbursts. He engages with his dad, and tests him to the limits. His mother is the least aggressive and passive of the whole lot. She is the calmer of the unit. Joran's own statements as to Natalee have been dissociative. He has sought to distance as has his father from the outside media. Natalee's parents on speaking to the father in the early days may as reported have found him to be condescending, arrogant - as stated and above the law. He is however a trainee judge on the island. The judge in the case is an impartial highly qualified judge who is from another island. He is above Joran's father and most people on the island. He will use behavioral assessments, medical records, and all past behaviour to form an opinion on what Joran and the family have as issues on deviant behaviour already exhibited.

Locals are invaluable in message boards as both devils advocate and as insights into the island and of the person in both supporting and non supporting roles to a behavioural profiler.

The issue of the lighthouse as distancing, there is one other near the International School at the extreme south of the Island.

I do not think this was an impromtu event, due to the fight with the lads of Natalees school and the planning element of cognitive minds in three predators shown to be so by locals on the island and his mode of humiliating girls in groups. He is most likely to have taken her in equal matches of power between the two brothers using the safety key of his fathers position. This is a tool for his authority and credibility.

I have to assume to implicate the guards at her hotel he had to have passed in the car and seen this walkie talkie at some time, or that evening to be able to finger these as suspects to allow his release and those of the other two. Hence he, or the two brothers passed that hotel around that time. I would therefore say for the plan to work, if she is dead, she will have been there in some construction area site to make this stick.

In later retractions and distancing she is now said to be in a lighthouse, which one? Why this lead to the extreme North, she is then said to be on a beach, all of which is past her hotel. She is said to be left on that or a beach with Joran. No it does not cognitively fit. They were all together for some period of time, what time we do not know. It is therefore imperative that the findings are in secret from media in order for the search of what looks like her remains to happen, or cloths/DNA. If she is alive, the reward will allow that person to post on messages that will lead to her finding, for she is still on the land on the island. Not in my view off the island, in the sea, and would look inland as behavioural environmental psychology at the familiarity of the suspects and easy access in a car. My professional insights follow this process.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 10, 2008, 07:44:06 PM
I must with Dave that the Sloot residence played an important role.  What's the consensus here...

To what extent was the VDS residence used in NH's dissapearance?
Hard to say as to what extent OE..But since Karin Janssen,Judge Wit and Gerald Dompig are all caught lying why they blocked the search of the home and refused to let it be searched..One has to wonder why? They had a full search warrant 16 days after Natalee dissapeared but still blocked the search the day of the search..Why would they do that? Why would the Judge say they never asked to search that property anymore then Jorans Apt but the Chief Prosecuter and Deputy commissioner say they were denied,they said they were also denied when Paul Van Der Sloot was arrested for Pre-Meditated Murder and Kidnapping..Why would the Judge say Dompig obstructed Justice and didn't want that house searched so PVDS could have his privacy? Since when do Murder and Kidnapping suspects get immunity from having there house searched? We know they tried to frame two innocent men and they immediately searched there house! What was Peter R reporting that something happened in the garden in 2006? Yet in 2007 that is exactly where the KLPD forensic team focused there search on.


They didn't search the Van der Sloot house after Paulus was arrested for conspiracy to commit murder either. I believe Jannsen, Van der Straten, Jacobs, Vocking and Judge Wit knew damn well Natalee was murdered at the Van der Sloot house and that's why it was never searched the residence until two years later.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Observer on March 10, 2008, 07:44:53 PM
The Persistence is completing its last leg of the journey home.  It should arrive some time on Wed.  Incredibly, the Persistence never saw anything over 4ft seas the entire way from Aruba to Mexico with 2kt currents and the wind at its stern - it made awesome time.  It had to spend a few days in Mexico where it refueled until the Gulf calmed down, but it's good to go now.  Thanks for all the prayers. 
Thats great news OE  ::MonkeyDance:: I hope someone gets the chance to check out those targets that you all worked so hard to locate! It would be terrible to always wonder if you found her but just never got the chance to make that dive to locate her and bring her home....Where she belongs...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: JE on March 10, 2008, 07:48:04 PM
Anyone else think its weird that in the PRDV tapes joran says as to why he called Daury:

Then I panicked.
I think, nobody even knows I am out of the house, I just left the house,
you know, so I'm thinking, what do I have to do? What do I have to do?

But the next day as Beth and company went to the Sloot house at 2.00 or 3.00 am, he was not in his appartement again but gambling at the Windham

Hard to believe that seemingly structural behaviour would make him panic


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: oceanexploration on March 10, 2008, 07:53:40 PM
Question:
Why would multiple legal professionals jeopardize their careers, livelihood, and freedom to cover for the VDSs?

-All very close friends?
- PvdS has dirt on them all and willing to use it as leverage?
- Blackmail?
 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: blah on March 10, 2008, 07:54:01 PM
This is WAY off topic but I just received this in an e-mail and just have to share it with all of you monkeys.

If you have the time, watch the whole thing, it is really something....

http://video.stumbleupon.com/#p=ithct48cqw



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 10, 2008, 07:54:57 PM
The Persistence is completing its last leg of the journey home.  It should arrive some time on Wed.  Incredibly, the Persistence never saw anything over 4ft seas the entire way from Aruba to Mexico with 2kt currents and the wind at its stern - it made awesome time.  It had to spend a few days in Mexico where it refueled until the Gulf calmed down, but it's good to go now.  Thanks for all the prayers. 
Thats great news OE  ::MonkeyDance:: I hope someone gets the chance to check out those targets that you all worked so hard to locate! It would be terrible to always wonder if you found her but just never got the chance to make that dive to locate her and bring her home....Where she belongs...


Glad Persistence is having a safe voyage back. Something evil about the waters of Aruba, very reflective of the government, law enforcement. tourism authority and judicial system, pure evil.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on March 10, 2008, 07:55:12 PM
Interesting to look at the islands yearbooks..Such a small class but yet so many with the same last name..Kock,Arendsz,Arends,Maduro..Croes..and yes Wever  ::MonkeyWink::

(http://i198.photobucket.com/albums/aa118/Observer00000007/1983-v21.jpg)
That is interesting.Lot of them look unhappy,mainly the girls.Wonder if we can find one with Lorenzo in it?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 10, 2008, 08:00:17 PM
Question:
Why would multiple legal professionals jeopardize their careers, livelihood, and freedom to cover for the VDSs?

-All very close friends?
- PvdS has dirt on them all and willing to use it as leverage?
- Blackmail?
 


ALL OF THE ABOVE and probably a few more. Add The Mafia and its storefront tourism organizations ATA/AHATA in there. Paulus probably has some connections there, his business partner Antonio Carlo, Joran's lawyer, sits on the board of AHATA and they are the ones who attacked Natalee and Beth in the media.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on March 10, 2008, 08:02:14 PM
I must with Dave that the Sloot residence played an important role.  What's the consensus here...

To what extent was the VDS residence used in NH's dissapearance?
Hi Ocean,good to see you all made it back home safe.

Considering that the van der sloots decided it was a GOOD thing to give their wayward,sicko,out of control son a line of credit at the casinos and carlos&Charlies bar,and his own little private party pad at the age of 15.....I'd say joran used his little apartment for sex parties,and that he took Natalee there(like he took all of his girls there,with his parents approval),Natalee was raped and over drugged and died there.Then they possibly moved her around the dirty little island a couple of times then out to sea.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Observer on March 10, 2008, 08:03:57 PM
Anyone else think its weird that in the PRDV tapes joran says as to why he called Daury:

Then I panicked.
I think, nobody even knows I am out of the house, I just left the house,
you know, so I'm thinking, what do I have to do? What do I have to do?

But the next day as Beth and company went to the Sloot house at 2.00 or 3.00 am, he was not in his appartement again but gambling at the Windham

Hard to believe that seemingly structural behaviour would make him panic


Yes and even harder to believe that Patrick left it the way it was without answering any questions..She goes into convulsions and he calls for help and they dump her in the ocean not knowing if she was alive or dead..Certainly Patrick knew that was all BS,He is way to street smart and after months with Joran surely knew what the motive was that night.Even after 10 confessions with him he asked nothing really important like why the hell she was dying just 1 hours after getting in that car,or why she was unconscious..etc. I will not be buying his book either as something is very fishy!

Remember Joran was home when the Family arrived on the island,as Deepak's car was spotted but when they arrived at the house it was gone and so was Joran. Plus he was sweaty,not wearing the right clothes and lied where he was gambling at. They were not out gambling on the night of the 30th..

When he was speaking of Daury,I am absolutely convinced he was speaking of his Father and his friend/half brother who helped. Also convinced they immediately dumped her in the ocean..It all seemed staged and 95% of it was BS!..IMO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: oceanexploration on March 10, 2008, 08:04:41 PM
The Persistence is completing its last leg of the journey home.  It should arrive some time on Wed.  Incredibly, the Persistence never saw anything over 4ft seas the entire way from Aruba to Mexico with 2kt currents and the wind at its stern - it made awesome time.  It had to spend a few days in Mexico where it refueled until the Gulf calmed down, but it's good to go now.  Thanks for all the prayers. 
Thats great news OE  ::MonkeyDance:: I hope someone gets the chance to check out those targets that you all worked so hard to locate! It would be terrible to always wonder if you found her but just never got the chance to make that dive to locate her and bring her home....Where she belongs...
Perhaps I can clarify things a bit.  The press always seems to word things so they sound worse than they are. 

The search was not flat out "called-off".  The side scan sonar search is complete.  We covered all of the planned area (and other non-planned areas) with 200% coverage.  This means every inch of seabed was covered twice on average over about 50 sq miles. Many sonar targets were identified and explored with the first round of ROV dives between Dec 29th to about the 7th of January.  What has not been completed is the ROV dives on sonar targets found after about the 2nd week of January through the end of the sonar search.  These targets (as well as the first dive series picks) were picked under the assumption that any type of containment of human remains should be explored, rather than just fish traps.  This method makes no guesses as to what we "know" or "don't know" about the case, rather it leaves no stone unturned. Once adequate funding is procured a dedicated ROV vessel and crew will complete the dives.  A ROV boat is more efficient and economical at conducting the ROV dives than the Persistence with it's extra equipment and personnel.
In this case it's best to return to the site with exactly the right equipment to do the job.  The remotely operated vehicle (ROV) that is eventually sent to Aruba will be better suited for the deepest dive sites.  It will also come equipped with better recovery capabilities if necessary.  For working in the deepest portions of the search area, the SeaEye Falcon ROV had potentially insufficient tether and therefore may not have been able to reach the deepest targets. 
I look at this as a retreat.  By retreat, I mean a temporary strategic withdrawal from battle, work, or operations. It is best to return home to re-tool, plan, and procure funding rather than pressing forward beyond financial, technical, and physical limits.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: bleachedblack on March 10, 2008, 08:04:53 PM
Question:
Why would multiple legal professionals jeopardize their careers, livelihood, and freedom to cover for the VDSs?

-All very close friends?
- PvdS has dirt on them all and willing to use it as leverage?
- Blackmail?
 


ALL OF THE ABOVE and probably a few more. Add The Mafia and its storefront tourism organizations ATA/AHATA in there. Paulus probably has some connections there, his business partner Antonio Carlo, Joran's lawyer, sits on the board of AHATA and they are the ones who attacked Natalee and Beth in the media.

...add to the mix the credo that NOTHING should mar the reputation of Aruba as an "idyllic" tourist destination......and you have legals, politicos, and common folks alike willing to do anything it takes to maintain that image.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 10, 2008, 08:09:40 PM
I must with Dave that the Sloot residence played an important role.  What's the consensus here...

To what extent was the VDS residence used in NH's dissapearance?
Hi Ocean,good to see you all made it back home safe.

Considering that the van der sloots decided it was a GOOD thing to give their wayward,sicko,out of control son a line of credit at the casinos and carlos&Charlies bar,and his own little private party pad at the age of 15.....I'd say joran used his little apartment for sex parties,and that he took Natalee there(like he took all of his girls there,with his parents approval),Natalee was raped and over drugged and died there.Then they possibly moved her around the dirty little island a couple of times then out to sea.


Yep.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 10, 2008, 08:12:31 PM
Question:
Why would multiple legal professionals jeopardize their careers, livelihood, and freedom to cover for the VDSs?

-All very close friends?
- PvdS has dirt on them all and willing to use it as leverage?
- Blackmail?
 


ALL OF THE ABOVE and probably a few more. Add The Mafia and its storefront tourism organizations ATA/AHATA in there. Paulus probably has some connections there, his business partner Antonio Carlo, Joran's lawyer, sits on the board of AHATA and they are the ones who attacked Natalee and Beth in the media.

...add to the mix the credo that NOTHING should mar the reputation of Aruba as an "idyllic" tourist destination......and you have legals, politicos, and common folks alike willing to do anything it takes to maintain that image.


Add to that the Aruba journalists who deliberately put lies out in the media and on internet sites to try to sway the investigation away from the Van der Sloots.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: JE on March 10, 2008, 08:13:43 PM
This is WAY off topic but I just received this in an e-mail and just have to share it with all of you monkeys.

If you have the time, watch the whole thing, it is really something....

http://video.stumbleupon.com/#p=ithct48cqw



Wow amazing man, very impressive, very true


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 10, 2008, 08:16:12 PM
I must with Dave that the Sloot residence played an important role.  What's the consensus here...

To what extent was the VDS residence used in NH's dissapearance?
Hi Ocean,good to see you all made it back home safe.

Considering that the van der sloots decided it was a GOOD thing to give their wayward,sicko,out of control son a line of credit at the casinos and carlos&Charlies bar,and his own little private party pad at the age of 15.....I'd say joran used his little apartment for sex parties,and that he took Natalee there(like he took all of his girls there,with his parents approval),Natalee was raped and over drugged and died there.Then they possibly moved her around the dirty little island a couple of times then out to sea.

Karma ... the following segment was taken from the New York lawsuit brought again Paulus and Joran van der Sloot by Beth Twitty and Dave Holloway. 

Janet

++++++++++++

HELEN LEJUEZ - ARUBAN FAMILY ATTORNEY

Affidavid of C. Helen Lejuez

<snipped>

5. ... Miss Doe told me that she was coming forward at that time because she had had an experience that might be similar to Natalee's experience.

6. Miss Doe informed me that, one evening during early in 2005, she met Joran van der Sloot at Carlos'n Charlie's nightclub in Aruba.

7. Miss Doe told me that, over the course of the night, Joran van der Sloot gave her several alcoholic beverages. Miss Doe further stated that she believes that Joran van der Sloot placed some kind of narcotic substance in one of her drinks. The reason she believes she was drugged is that her level of intoxication was greatly disportionate to the amount of alcohol that she consumed.

8. Later that night, according to Miss Doe, Joran Van der Sloot brought Miss Doe back to his apartment, adjacent to his parent's house.

9. Miss Doe then told me that she was sexually assaulted by Joran van der Sloot as she faded in and out of conciousness, At no time did Miss Doe consent to any sexual contact with Joran van der Sloot.

10. Miss Doe advised me that, shortly after she was sexually assaulted by Joran van der Sloot, she learned that two other young women, ages 16 and 17, suffered attacks by Joran van der Sloot under similar circumstances.  
11. Miss Doe told me that, in the aftermath of Joran van der Sloot's attack on Miss Doe, she was threatened and intimidated by Joran van der Sloot, his friends and others. She had been terrified to come forward and tell her story in Aruba.


Jossy Mansur
'Scarborough Country'
August 26, 2005


DANIELS:  It definitely smells that way.  You know, if you take the prosecution‘s statement at its face, we are talking on a whole new level, the charges here.  We are talking about drugs.  We are talking about rape and we are talking about rape of many different people.  There are four guys now in custody, four best friends.  What does that tell you?
 
MANSUR:  Well, what it tells me is that, really, these four guys are friends.  They belong to the same group, these party boys that go out and prey on young, unsuspected girls or other kinds of girls also that are out to have a good time, not suspecting what they‘re in for with these predators around.

And they are—they not only appear in photographs together, but I understand that Freddy lives very near to the Joran house.  So, there is a bond between them.  There is a group that they call themselves the pimps, in which all of these participate.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Observer on March 10, 2008, 08:16:42 PM
Question:
Why would multiple legal professionals jeopardize their careers, livelihood, and freedom to cover for the VDSs?

-All very close friends?
- PvdS has dirt on them all and willing to use it as leverage?
- Blackmail?
 

Good question! We know Jan VDS was a very close friend,We know Dompig is related to the Kalpoes and we know he worked many years with the people in the Prosecuters office and as a lawyer for the Govt,plus he was a replacement Judge. Two weeks after Natalee dissapears and Joran's Attorney relieves his conscious and tells the Chief Prosecuter that Joran plays a major role in Natalee's dissapearance..What does she do? Nothing! The Judge says the OM never asked to search anything more than his Apt. They say they were denied? Who is lying and Why?

My guess is they thought it would all go away and his friends helped him cover everything up..Problem is it never went away and they couldn't go back and re-do the damage they already did..Not exactly sure why on June 10th and 11th they reported a confession,natalee confirmed dead and were retreaving her body..It all changed in a heartbeat and it was the closest we have seen to this being solved. Van Der Sloots,Wevers and whoever else probably blackmailed Rudy Croes and he did a complete 180 and announced that it was all mis-information.

If you look at the recent history of Aruba there hasnt been a murder in 13 years of a American as they all have dissapeared or killed themselves. We also the report of the gangrape/filming of the 16 year old as she was forced to move elsewhere and received no justice..I think it's part of the mentality of the island,blackmail and a cover up that went to deep and involved too many.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: JE on March 10, 2008, 08:21:08 PM
Question:
Why would multiple legal professionals jeopardize their careers, livelihood, and freedom to cover for the VDSs?

-All very close friends?
- PvdS has dirt on them all and willing to use it as leverage?
- Blackmail?
 


ALL OF THE ABOVE and probably a few more. Add The Mafia and its storefront tourism organizations ATA/AHATA in there. Paulus probably has some connections there, his business partner Antonio Carlo, Joran's lawyer, sits on the board of AHATA and they are the ones who attacked Natalee and Beth in the media.

Once you start lying its hard to go back and lose face. This is probably even more true for people in higher positions.
So what other choice ist there but to maintain that the lies are the truth


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 10, 2008, 08:22:24 PM
Perhaps I can clarify things a bit.  The press always seems to word things so they sound worse than they are. 

The search was not flat out "called-off".  The side scan sonar search is complete.  We covered all of the planned area (and other non-planned areas) with 200% coverage.  This means every inch of seabed was covered twice on average over about 50 sq miles. Many sonar targets were identified and explored with the first round of ROV dives between Dec 29th to about the 7th of January.  What has not been completed is the ROV dives on sonar targets found after about the 2nd week of January through the end of the sonar search.  These targets (as well as the first dive series picks) were picked under the assumption that any type of containment of human remains should be explored, rather than just fish traps.  This method makes no guesses as to what we "know" or "don't know" about the case, rather it leaves no stone unturned. Once adequate funding is procured a dedicated ROV vessel and crew will complete the dives.  A ROV boat is more efficient and economical at conducting the ROV dives than the Persistence with it's extra equipment and personnel.
In this case it's best to return to the site with exactly the right equipment to do the job.  The remotely operated vehicle (ROV) that is eventually sent to Aruba will be better suited for the deepest dive sites.  It will also come equipped with better recovery capabilities if necessary.  For working in the deepest portions of the search area, the SeaEye Falcon ROV had potentially insufficient tether and therefore may not have been able to reach the deepest targets. 
I look at this as a retreat.  By retreat, I mean a temporary strategic withdrawal from battle, work, or operations. It is best to return home to re-tool, plan, and procure funding rather than pressing forward beyond financial, technical, and physical limits.


I am amazed at the patience and thoroughness you folks have. I pray the funding will come availlable to finish the ROV dives that will lead to answers OE.

Any off the wall stuff you can to tell us about the whole experience?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 10, 2008, 08:23:33 PM
Posted by Lazlo at RU:

Uitgeverij Foreign Media Books laat maandag weten dat 'Overboord. Hoe ik Joran van der Sloot aan het praten kreeg' rond 25 juni verschijnt.

Publisher Foreign Media Books announced Monday that 'Overboard. How I got Joran van der Sloot to talk' will be published June 25.

http://www.planet.nl/planet/show/id=62967/contentid=917917/sc=5e16df

I won't be buying...Until it reads,"How I brought down the corruption in Aruba and made the guilty pay", I want none of it....

Tot ... I am with ya.

The implication of Peter Devries' words dictates that you and I will not be buying Patrick van der Eem's book any time soon.  Devries uphold Hans Mos and ... the Natalee Holloway investigative team.

Janet

++++++++++++


Peter Devries
On the Record w/ Greta
February 8, 2008


DE VRIES: Well, the Dutch police is very busy with the investigation. That's what I understood. And they are looking for this guy, whoever it may be.

VAN SUSTEREN: Now, do you have confidence in the Dutch police and the Aruba police in terms of this investigation?

DE VRIES: Yes. I met several guys from the team. I spoke to Hans Mos, the head prosecutor, and I'm confident, quite confident, that they will solve this case finally.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,329847,00.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Peaches on March 10, 2008, 08:26:41 PM
I must with Dave that the Sloot residence played an important role.  What's the consensus here...

To what extent was the VDS residence used in NH's dissapearance?

Short and to the point.  Natalee was raped and murdered at the Sloots.

I'd go so far as to say she was in the Kalpoe trunk during the confrontation at the Sloot residence.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Observer on March 10, 2008, 08:27:16 PM
Interesting to look at the islands yearbooks..Such a small class but yet so many with the same last name..Kock,Arendsz,Arends,Maduro..Croes..and yes Wever  ::MonkeyWink::
That is interesting.Lot of them look unhappy,mainly the girls.Wonder if we can find one with Lorenzo in it?
I stumbled onto a couple of years at that school but well before Lorenzo's time  ::MonkeyWink:: No one real important in the yearbooks except Robert Wever,you may see a couple of ministers..But no one tied into this case that I know of.

http://www.colegiopariba.freeservers.com/index.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Blue Moon on March 10, 2008, 08:28:02 PM
Question:
Why would multiple legal professionals jeopardize their careers, livelihood, and freedom to cover for the VDSs?

-All very close friends?
- PvdS has dirt on them all and willing to use it as leverage?
- Blackmail?
 

All very close friends.  Dutch elitists. Cannot associate with anyone beneath them. Must believe whatever comes from their mouths.  Mind-set of the Dutch/Aruban.  Must never go against one of your own when it is an American involved.  Nothing more than the U.S. has had thrown at us for years.  We are the Cowboys, they are the wronged party.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on March 10, 2008, 08:32:23 PM
I wonder if this is Val van der sloot......

http://www.aruba.com/forum/f7/i-born-aruba-1954-a-27399/index2.html


 08-28-2007, 08:15 AM    post #12 (permalink)   

Valentijn
Junior Member
 

Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1  Lago > Isa

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

What a surprise to see so many former Lago High student posts! I am currently a senior at the International School of Aruba, which as some of you may know was, 75 years ago, known at the Lago Hights Community High School. I'm sitting here looking at yearbooks from as far back as 1948, all the way up to the present. I am a member of the yearbook staff and in this year's book we want to include a look back at the past section. I was wondering if there were any old Lago High and/or ISA alumni that wanted to contact me with any fun facts and any stories about the school in general. I am AMAZED when I look back at the pictures of the activities and events that used to take place in the Colony and although the school has since moved into a brand new building Lago Hights (now Valero refinary) is where it all started.
     




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on March 10, 2008, 08:33:43 PM
I must with Dave that the Sloot residence played an important role.  What's the consensus here...

To what extent was the VDS residence used in NH's dissapearance?

I believe they were there.  In Greta's interview with Joran he told her they stopped by his house, but did not get out of the car.  Deepak and Satish have never stated this to be true.  Both Kalpoes said they drove by the lighthouse, not Joran's house.

It is during this point where Joran claims they sat in the car and talked outside of the Van Der Sloot property. This is the place where Joran claims that Natalee made negative comments about the Kalpoes and her own mother.  Since Deepak told ALE that he never heard Natalee make any of those comments you have to figure this is something Joran made up in his own mind.  Sitting 'outside' his home talking to Natalee??  This is the place where Joran wants to think of Natalee as a bad person.  imo


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Tater on March 10, 2008, 08:35:43 PM
Posted by Lazlo at RU:

Uitgeverij Foreign Media Books laat maandag weten dat 'Overboord. Hoe ik Joran van der Sloot aan het praten kreeg' rond 25 juni verschijnt.

Publisher Foreign Media Books announced Monday that 'Overboard. How I got Joran van der Sloot to talk' will be published June 25.

http://www.planet.nl/planet/show/id=62967/contentid=917917/sc=5e16df

I won't be buying...Until it reads,"How I brought down the corruption in Aruba and made the guilty pay", I want none of it....

Tot ... I am with ya.

The implication of Peter Devries' words dictates that you and I will not be buying Patrick van der Eem's book any time soon.  Devries uphold Hans Mos and ... the Natalee Holloway investigative team.

Janet

++++++++++++


Peter Devries
On the Record w/ Greta
February 8, 2008


DE VRIES: Well, the Dutch police is very busy with the investigation. That's what I understood. And they are looking for this guy, whoever it may be.

VAN SUSTEREN: Now, do you have confidence in the Dutch police and the Aruba police in terms of this investigation?

DE VRIES: Yes. I met several guys from the team. I spoke to Hans Mos, the head prosecutor, and I'm confident, quite confident, that they will solve this case finally.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,329847,00.html

I know..:(  It sickens me to think of people making money off of an 18 year old girl who was murdered in Aruba.Patrick gave us nothing.As far as I'm concerned,they could all be in *cahoots* to make millions.I definitly won't be contributing to their efforts. I'll contribute to having the blade on the guillotine sharpened when it's off with a few heads but as for now,I'm keeping my pennies...Hugs Janet,it's good to not be alone in my way of thinking...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 10, 2008, 08:36:09 PM
Question:
Why would multiple legal professionals jeopardize their careers, livelihood, and freedom to cover for the VDSs?

-All very close friends?
- PvdS has dirt on them all and willing to use it as leverage?
- Blackmail?
 

All very close friends.  Dutch elitists. Cannot associate with anyone beneath them. Must believe whatever comes from their mouths.  Mind-set of the Dutch/Aruban.  Must never go against one of your own when it is an American involved.  Nothing more than the U.S. has had thrown at us for years.  We are the Cowboys, they are the wronged party.

Literally everything thing they could do wrong, they did it. There is no logic to any of it from the investigation to the disastrous PR campaign they ran against Natalee and the family.

They will pay for this for a long time. Their greed and egos overwhelmed their integrity, common sense and decency.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on March 10, 2008, 08:36:50 PM
The Persistence is completing its last leg of the journey home.  It should arrive some time on Wed.  Incredibly, the Persistence never saw anything over 4ft seas the entire way from Aruba to Mexico with 2kt currents and the wind at its stern - it made awesome time.  It had to spend a few days in Mexico where it refueled until the Gulf calmed down, but it's good to go now.  Thanks for all the prayers. 

What good fortune you had on the return trip!  I know you can't wait to dock in the good ole U.S. of A.!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: oceanexploration on March 10, 2008, 08:38:38 PM
It's interesting to me how the water offshore Aruba is rather allegorical of the Island's condition. 

Near the beach the ocean is shallow, full of life, vibrant - so full of color and character, quiescent, and safe.  It's absolutely beautiful, promising, and inviting.  The water is refreshing, clean, and good.

Offshore, the water becomes suddenly deep, dark and cold.  You get out of the lee of the island and the sea becomes volatile and unforgiving.  It'll be calm one minute, and a torrent the next.  It is a deceptive environment which looks inviting but only seeks to devour.  A large portion of the area literally means "don't go there".  If you are unfamiliar with the nature of the environment, you won't realize the 4kt current silently whisking you farther into the open ocean. The hidden dangers are evident in the wrecks which have fallen as victims of the turmoil.

If only these conditions were unique to Aruba. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: texasmom on March 10, 2008, 08:39:00 PM
I must with Dave that the Sloot residence played an important role.  What's the consensus here...

To what extent was the VDS residence used in NH's dissapearance?

I agree with Dave and you, OE.  I believe the VDS residence played an important role in this case.  The MB kids that interacted with JVDS before the fateful evening ALL said that he claimed to be a college student from Holland on holiday in Aruba.  I believe that Natalee was only taken to the house after she'd been drugged, BUT WAS AT THE VDS RESIDENCE at some point during the night in question.  I believe that is why he includes a visit to his house during his interview with Greta Van Sustern.  I believe he felt there could have been witnesses to the Kalpoe car being there during that night.  He says that Natalee wanted to go there, but Natalee didn't know he had a house in Aruba, she thought as the other MB students that he was staying at the Holiday Inn as they were.  It's amazing how he mixes a little truth into a lot of lies in all of his statements.  I've snipped portions of his interview with Greta Van Sustern.

Greta Interview with JVDS part 1 snip

 VAN DER SLOOT: No, it was just, yes, it was just they turn off the music and they turn off everything and it was just time to go, yes.
VAN SUSTEREN: Had you made any agreement or arrangement with Natalee at that point to leave with her or anything?
VAN DER SLOOT: No, not at all. That came very spontaneously. She's like, "OK, you want me to go with you?" And I was like "OK." And I saw her go up to some of her friends. I don't know what she said to them. And then, yes, then we — then we ended up leaving. The plan was to go to my house.


VAN DER SLOOT: I told her I was 19, when I was actually 17 but, yes.


VAN SUSTEREN: Did you say where, you know, your plans or anything like that what you wanted to do? I mean was there that much of a dialog between you?
VAN DER SLOOT: Not really. I mean I never really got to actually know her. I really didn't actually ever get, you know, to know her like you know a friend or you know someone like that. It was just casual talking. You know a little about each other and that's all it was.

VAN DER SLOOT: No, just between me and Natalee. We were speaking English to each other and I asked her if she wanted to go back to her hotel and that's when she said that she wanted to — she asked me if I -- if I had a big house or not and then — then she said — I said to her "Do you want to see my house?" And she's like "Yes, I want to go to your house."

VAN SUSTEREN: So you leave Carlos 'nCharlie's and your intention was to head to your house. Did you actually head to your house?
VAN DER SLOOT: Yes, we did. We actually did end up heading to my house because that's what she was — that's what she wanted to, so I was fine with it. And then during the car ride she was — she had her hand on my — on my leg and I had my hand on her leg and we were both in the back. We were kissing each other and so I took (INAUDIBLE) in a — in a positive not in a bad way.
VAN SUSTEREN: Did you ever actually make it to your house?
VAN DER SLOOT: Yes, we did. We actually did stop in front of my house. We got to my house and then, yes then I — then she said she wanted to go see sharks.
VAN SUSTEREN: Did you actually go into your house with her?
VAN DER SLOOT: No, no, no. We never even got out of the car there.
VAN SUSTEREN: She had no interest in going into your house? She didn't say anything?
VAN DER SLOOT: No, at that point she wanted — she wanted to go see sharks is what she said
and then she came with a strange story that her mom was Hitler's sister or Hitler's sister's daughter and she was sorry to me for that because — because I don't know if she thought I was German or something and I'm like "I'm Dutch, so I don't really care about anything like that." And I asked, "You're joking right?" And she said, "No, no, no, no, I'm serious. I'm serious."
Just another example of that is, you know, that's a strange story. That makes absolutely no sense. Why would you say something like that if it's not true? But there's actually police reports of one of her friends that says she told her the same thing.

(on the beach conv per JVDS)
VAN DER SLOOT: Yes, I told her that — I lied to her that I was 19. I said that I was going to go study in the states at St. Leo (ph) University and, you know, I was just — we were just having casual talk talking about stuff.

JVDS says that Natalee wanted to go to his house and that it was his intention from the beginning to take her to his house.  (If you read the interview with Greta it was his intention to have sex with her.  I don't believe he took her to the beach to have sex with her.)  But then the minute they pull up in front of his house, she wants to see sharks.  He says "WE NEVER EVEN GOT OUT OF THE CAR THERE."  When Greta presses him and he senses that she's not buying the story he starts the crapola about Natalee saying her mother was related to Hitler.
 
If Natalee was NEVER in the house, why have the extreme measures been taken to prevent a search of the house?  What could they possibly have found that would have related to the case if she'd never been there.  Why did PVDS sweat gallons during the interview with his wife by Greta and Beth.  Beth sensed that she'd been there.   I think AVDS knew she had been too.  I think she was too.  I know there's more that I've left out but I hope this makes sense! 
 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Observer on March 10, 2008, 08:40:29 PM
I wonder if this is Val van der sloot......

http://www.aruba.com/forum/f7/i-born-aruba-1954-a-27399/index2.html
It's probably him..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: San on March 10, 2008, 08:42:20 PM
I must with Dave that the Sloot residence played an important role.  What's the consensus here...

To what extent was the VDS residence used in NH's dissapearance?

Short and to the point.  Natalee was raped and murdered at the Sloots.

I'd go so far as to say she was in the Kalpoe trunk during the confrontation at the Sloot residence.

I agree Peaches.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 10, 2008, 08:43:21 PM
I must with Dave that the Sloot residence played an important role.  What's the consensus here...

To what extent was the VDS residence used in NH's dissapearance?

I believe they were there.  In Greta's interview with Joran he told her they stopped by his house, but did not get out of the car.  Deepak and Satish have never stated this to be true.  Both Kalpoes said they drove by the lighthouse, not Joran's house.

It is during this point where Joran claims they sat in the car and talked outside of the Van Der Sloot property. This is the place where Joran claims that Natalee made negative comments about the Kalpoes and her own mother.  Since Deepak told ALE that he never heard Natalee make any of those comments you have to figure this is something Joran made up in his own mind.  Sitting 'outside' his home talking to Natalee??  This is the place where Joran wants to think of Natalee as a bad person.  imo


One of the few times we have heard Chief Dolf Richardson say jack he said that he believed they never were at the beach but very well could have been at the Van der Sloot house. Of course that was almost two years ago and Dolf still hasn't done jack.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on March 10, 2008, 08:45:56 PM
I must with Dave that the Sloot residence played an important role.  What's the consensus here...

To what extent was the VDS residence used in NH's dissapearance?
Hi Ocean,good to see you all made it back home safe.

Considering that the van der sloots decided it was a GOOD thing to give their wayward,sicko,out of control son a line of credit at the casinos and carlos&Charlies bar,and his own little private party pad at the age of 15.....I'd say joran used his little apartment for sex parties,and that he took Natalee there(like he took all of his girls there,with his parents approval),Natalee was raped and over drugged and died there.Then they possibly moved her around the dirty little island a couple of times then out to sea.

Karma ... the following segment was taken from the New York lawsuit brought again Paulus and Joran van der Sloot by Beth Twitty and Dave Holloway. 

Janet

++++++++++++

HELEN LEJUEZ - ARUBAN FAMILY ATTORNEY

Affidavid of C. Helen Lejuez

<snipped>

5. ... Miss Doe told me that she was coming forward at that time because she had had an experience that might be similar to Natalee's experience.

6. Miss Doe informed me that, one evening during early in 2005, she met Joran van der Sloot at Carlos'n Charlie's nightclub in Aruba.

7. Miss Doe told me that, over the course of the night, Joran van der Sloot gave her several alcoholic beverages. Miss Doe further stated that she believes that Joran van der Sloot placed some kind of narcotic substance in one of her drinks. The reason she believes she was drugged is that her level of intoxication was greatly disportionate to the amount of alcohol that she consumed.

8. Later that night, according to Miss Doe, Joran Van der Sloot brought Miss Doe back to his apartment, adjacent to his parent's house.

9. Miss Doe then told me that she was sexually assaulted by Joran van der Sloot as she faded in and out of conciousness, At no time did Miss Doe consent to any sexual contact with Joran van der Sloot.

10. Miss Doe advised me that, shortly after she was sexually assaulted by Joran van der Sloot, she learned that two other young women, ages 16 and 17, suffered attacks by Joran van der Sloot under similar circumstances.  
11. Miss Doe told me that, in the aftermath of Joran van der Sloot's attack on Miss Doe, she was threatened and intimidated by Joran van der Sloot, his friends and others. She had been terrified to come forward and tell her story in Aruba.


Jossy Mansur
'Scarborough Country'
August 26, 2005


DANIELS:  It definitely smells that way.  You know, if you take the prosecution‘s statement at its face, we are talking on a whole new level, the charges here.  We are talking about drugs.  We are talking about rape and we are talking about rape of many different people.  There are four guys now in custody, four best friends.  What does that tell you?
 
MANSUR:  Well, what it tells me is that, really, these four guys are friends.  They belong to the same group, these party boys that go out and prey on young, unsuspected girls or other kinds of girls also that are out to have a good time, not suspecting what they‘re in for with these predators around.

And they are—they not only appear in photographs together, but I understand that Freddy lives very near to the Joran house.  So, there is a bond between them.  There is a group that they call themselves the pimps, in which all of these participate.
Thank you Janet.
The pimps of aruba live on it seems,I wonder if they were taught this game by their Daddy's.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 10, 2008, 08:47:59 PM
I must with Dave that the Sloot residence played an important role.  What's the consensus here...

To what extent was the VDS residence used in NH's dissapearance?

Short and to the point.  Natalee was raped and murdered at the Sloots.

I'd go so far as to say she was in the Kalpoe trunk during the confrontation at the Sloot residence.

Peaches ... Jug Twitty's words implies that he believe that Natalee could have been in Deepak's trunk at the encounter at the VDS' residence on the morning of May 31, 2005.

At that point in time ... Jug never entertained the thought that a coverup to distance Joran and Paulus van der Sloot and ... deny his precious stepdaughter justice had already begun.

Janet

++++++++++++++


Jug Twitty
On the Record w/ Greta
July 19, 2005


TWITTY: I think he's going to get down there and start asking questions. I mean, there are so many things that went wrong in the beginning. And probably people know by now, Beth said the other night, we had an agent there on the ground when we got there with a chaperone, and we didn't find out until two days ago that this is an American — I think he was a DEA agent. I think he was just there vacationing, though. But anyway, he helped us that night, and he also waited and said, Wait before you go to the judge's house. I want to go with you.

And I find out two days ago that the Aruban authorities never took this man's statement. Beth and I are going, It's unbelievable. But you know what? They didn't take my statement until 30 days later, and I sat there and talked to the man for two hours, and his son. And they didn't take any of the statements from the people that were there. I probably had seven people in my so-called search party that night that we hit the ground, and it took them 19 days to take their statements.

So you know, if I had it all to do over again, Greta, when we got to that judge's house that night, we would have taken — we had three vans. I would have blocked that car in, and if I didn't think, you know, that the police were going to do anything the next morning, I would have parked those cars there and let them tow them away until I could open that  car, open that trunk and look in that silver car the next morning.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,162966,00.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Observer on March 10, 2008, 08:49:22 PM


One of the few times we have heard Chief Dolf Richardson say jack he said that he believed they never were at the beach but very well could have been at the Van der Sloot house. Of course that was almost two years ago and Dolf still hasn't done jack.

De Vries said his ALE sources told him the same thing in 2006,he said then that they don't think they ever went to the Beach but went to the VDS house and something happened by the garden. If you look at all the early NE articles they say there ALE source thinks she was drugged and taken back to the house. Here we are in 2008,they have 24 detectives on the case,Mos is blaming Natalee's Family and the American Media but yet we were closer to solving this on June 10th 2005  ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on March 10, 2008, 08:51:35 PM
Interesting to look at the islands yearbooks..Such a small class but yet so many with the same last name..Kock,Arendsz,Arends,Maduro..Croes..and yes Wever  ::MonkeyWink::
That is interesting.Lot of them look unhappy,mainly the girls.Wonder if we can find one with Lorenzo in it?
I stumbled onto a couple of years at that school but well before Lorenzo's time  ::MonkeyWink:: No one real important in the yearbooks except Robert Wever,you may see a couple of ministers..But no one tied into this case that I know of.

http://www.colegiopariba.freeservers.com/index.html
Thank you *******.
While it's slow around here I'm going to see if I can find out more info on Lorenzo.Also,does anyone know what Freddy's parents names are?What they do on aruba?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Blue Moon on March 10, 2008, 08:54:30 PM
It's interesting to me how the water offshore Aruba is rather allegorical of the Island's condition. 

Near the beach the ocean is shallow, full of life, vibrant - so full of color and character, quiescent, and safe.  It's absolutely beautiful, promising, and inviting.  The water is refreshing, clean, and good.

Offshore, the water becomes suddenly deep, dark and cold.  You get out of the lee of the island and the sea becomes volatile and unforgiving.  It'll be calm one minute, and a torrent the next.  It is a deceptive environment which looks inviting but only seeks to devour.  A large portion of the area literally means "don't go there". If you are unfamiliar with the nature of the environment, you won't realize the 4kt current silently whisking you farther into the open ocean. The hidden dangers are evident in the wrecks which have fallen as victims of the turmoil.

If only these conditions were unique to Aruba. 

To me you are describing Aruba and the merry-go-round this has been for Beth and Dave.  ::MonkeyWaa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 10, 2008, 08:55:13 PM

One of the few times we have heard Chief Dolf Richardson say jack he said that he believed they never were at the beach but very well could have been at the Van der Sloot house. Of course that was almost two years ago and Dolf still hasn't done jack.

De Vries said his ALE sources told him the same thing in 2006,he said then that they don't think they ever went to the Beach but went to the VDS house and something happened by the garden. If you look at all the early NE articles they say there ALE source thinks she was drugged and taken back to the house. Here we are in 2008,they have 24 detectives on the case,Mos is blaming Natalee's Family and the American Media but yet we were closer to solving this on June 10th 2005  ::MonkeyConfused::


I get the impression that Joran's confession was a real thorn in Hans' side. He had successfully closed the case without having to go to trial. Life was good for Hans. Then Joran congesses and makes him have to look like he's busy again.

Poor Hans.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Observer on March 10, 2008, 08:57:00 PM
Thank you *******.
While it's slow around here I'm going to see if I can find out more info on Lorenzo.Also,does anyone know what Freddy's parents names are?What they do on aruba?
YW..But I don't think you will find Freddy's,Kalpoes,GVC,SGC parents in any yearbook in Aruba as they are from other countries..I have done a lot of research on Lorenzo and have spoken to a classmate so I know he went to H.S. in Aruba for sure..No clue if it's uploaded online though..I would imagine LVR graduated about 1998  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Blue Moon on March 10, 2008, 08:59:15 PM
I must with Dave that the Sloot residence played an important role.  What's the consensus here...

To what extent was the VDS residence used in NH's dissapearance?
Hi Ocean,good to see you all made it back home safe.

Considering that the van der sloots decided it was a GOOD thing to give their wayward,sicko,out of control son a line of credit at the casinos and carlos&Charlies bar,and his own little private party pad at the age of 15.....I'd say joran used his little apartment for sex parties,and that he took Natalee there(like he took all of his girls there,with his parents approval),Natalee was raped and over drugged and died there.Then they possibly moved her around the dirty little island a couple of times then out to sea.

Karma ... the following segment was taken from the New York lawsuit brought again Paulus and Joran van der Sloot by Beth Twitty and Dave Holloway. 

Janet

++++++++++++

HELEN LEJUEZ - ARUBAN FAMILY ATTORNEY

Affidavid of C. Helen Lejuez

<snipped>

5. ... Miss Doe told me that she was coming forward at that time because she had had an experience that might be similar to Natalee's experience.

6. Miss Doe informed me that, one evening during early in 2005, she met Joran van der Sloot at Carlos'n Charlie's nightclub in Aruba.

7. Miss Doe told me that, over the course of the night, Joran van der Sloot gave her several alcoholic beverages. Miss Doe further stated that she believes that Joran van der Sloot placed some kind of narcotic substance in one of her drinks. The reason she believes she was drugged is that her level of intoxication was greatly disportionate to the amount of alcohol that she consumed.

8. Later that night, according to Miss Doe, Joran Van der Sloot brought Miss Doe back to his apartment, adjacent to his parent's house.

9. Miss Doe then told me that she was sexually assaulted by Joran van der Sloot as she faded in and out of conciousness, At no time did Miss Doe consent to any sexual contact with Joran van der Sloot.

10. Miss Doe advised me that, shortly after she was sexually assaulted by Joran van der Sloot, she learned that two other young women, ages 16 and 17, suffered attacks by Joran van der Sloot under similar circumstances.  
11. Miss Doe told me that, in the aftermath of Joran van der Sloot's attack on Miss Doe, she was threatened and intimidated by Joran van der Sloot, his friends and others. She had been terrified to come forward and tell her story in Aruba.


Jossy Mansur
'Scarborough Country'
August 26, 2005


DANIELS:  It definitely smells that way.  You know, if you take the prosecution‘s statement at its face, we are talking on a whole new level, the charges here.  We are talking about drugs.  We are talking about rape and we are talking about rape of many different people.  There are four guys now in custody, four best friends.  What does that tell you?
 
MANSUR:  Well, what it tells me is that, really, these four guys are friends.  They belong to the same group, these party boys that go out and prey on young, unsuspected girls or other kinds of girls also that are out to have a good time, not suspecting what they‘re in for with these predators around.

And they are—they not only appear in photographs together, but I understand that Freddy lives very near to the Joran house.  So, there is a bond between them.  There is a group that they call themselves the pimps, in which all of these participate.
Thank you Janet.
The pimps of aruba live on it seems,I wonder if they were taught this game by their Daddy's.

I said this the other night (i am like Klaas "Nobody ever listens to me") but I believe this could have been an initiation into the pimps for the younger boys as this group would be moving on (except Satish who stil hasn't graduated from high school). 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 10, 2008, 09:05:17 PM
It's interesting to me how the water offshore Aruba is rather allegorical of the Island's condition. 

Near the beach the ocean is shallow, full of life, vibrant - so full of color and character, quiescent, and safe.  It's absolutely beautiful, promising, and inviting.  The water is refreshing, clean, and good.

Offshore, the water becomes suddenly deep, dark and cold.  You get out of the lee of the island and the sea becomes volatile and unforgiving.  It'll be calm one minute, and a torrent the next.  It is a deceptive environment which looks inviting but only seeks to devour.  A large portion of the area literally means "don't go there". If you are unfamiliar with the nature of the environment, you won't realize the 4kt current silently whisking you farther into the open ocean. The hidden dangers are evident in the wrecks which have fallen as victims of the turmoil.

If only these conditions were unique to Aruba. 

To me you are describing Aruba and the merry-go-round this has been for Beth and Dave.  ::MonkeyWaa::


 ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Observer on March 10, 2008, 09:11:58 PM


I get the impression that Joran's confession was a real thorn in Hans' side. He had successfully closed the case without having to go to trial. Life was good for Hans. Then Joran congesses and makes him have to look like he's busy again.

Poor Hans.


You got that right! Not only Hans but Rudy Croes,Wit and everyone else! They went on record as happy as could be..Don't feel bad Americans..Even though the case is closed and they are released as suspects..It can still be reopened if in the next 12 years if Major new evidence is found like Natalee's body,forensic evidence that we destroyed or if the ocean suddenly goes dry..The only ones they are Mad at is Joran for screwing up and anyone that tries to get the truth out of him.

Heck even Judge Wit came out of his closet after the case closed to defend himself,he said about the same thing that there is major suspicions,and some evidence,all you need is something major like forensic evidence or her body..Good luck with that! However he made the situation worse when he tried to point fingers at the OM for never asking to search more than Jorans little Apt and accused Dompig of Obstruction of Justice when defending his unbelievable rulings.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: texasmom on March 10, 2008, 09:17:03 PM
The Persistence is completing its last leg of the journey home.  It should arrive some time on Wed.  Incredibly, the Persistence never saw anything over 4ft seas the entire way from Aruba to Mexico with 2kt currents and the wind at its stern - it made awesome time.  It had to spend a few days in Mexico where it refueled until the Gulf calmed down, but it's good to go now.  Thanks for all the prayers. 
Thats great news OE  ::MonkeyDance:: I hope someone gets the chance to check out those targets that you all worked so hard to locate! It would be terrible to always wonder if you found her but just never got the chance to make that dive to locate her and bring her home....Where she belongs...
Perhaps I can clarify things a bit.  The press always seems to word things so they sound worse than they are. 

The search was not flat out "called-off".  The side scan sonar search is complete.  We covered all of the planned area (and other non-planned areas) with 200% coverage.  This means every inch of seabed was covered twice on average over about 50 sq miles. Many sonar targets were identified and explored with the first round of ROV dives between Dec 29th to about the 7th of January.  What has not been completed is the ROV dives on sonar targets found after about the 2nd week of January through the end of the sonar search.  These targets (as well as the first dive series picks) were picked under the assumption that any type of containment of human remains should be explored, rather than just fish traps.  This method makes no guesses as to what we "know" or "don't know" about the case, rather it leaves no stone unturned. Once adequate funding is procured a dedicated ROV vessel and crew will complete the dives.  A ROV boat is more efficient and economical at conducting the ROV dives than the Persistence with it's extra equipment and personnel.
In this case it's best to return to the site with exactly the right equipment to do the job.  The remotely operated vehicle (ROV) that is eventually sent to Aruba will be better suited for the deepest dive sites.  It will also come equipped with better recovery capabilities if necessary.  For working in the deepest portions of the search area, the SeaEye Falcon ROV had potentially insufficient tether and therefore may not have been able to reach the deepest targets. 
I look at this as a retreat.  By retreat, I mean a temporary strategic withdrawal from battle, work, or operations. It is best to return home to re-tool, plan, and procure funding rather than pressing forward beyond financial, technical, and physical limits.

Sounds like a good plan Kyle.  I hope your "retreat" is all that you need it to be.  I know you all had to be physically and mentally exhausted.  Do you have any idea on the status of the funding?  If we need to try to do more, we need to know.  I know there are many creative people that come to this forum and some had even started planning a concert to fund the effort.  Please try to get us an update as to where the donations stand, and what more is needed.  Thanks in advance!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Observer on March 10, 2008, 09:20:10 PM
I think Michael Posner is related to these other Posner's like Harry,Oiky and Luis..They go back over 40 years in Aruba and somehow they are connected through blood or business..Oiky made his fortune in the Liquor business so it could be that..All I know is you have a proud Family with the name Posner for 40 years in this tiny island of Aruba and all of a sudden a convicted Mobster changes his name to yours and moves on the island..If I was them I wouldn't be to happy about it but I get the feeling they know each other..IMO


Facing the camera on the left are the Posner's (Oiky and Greta).  We have known them for more than fourty years. They are very good friends of our family.
http://www.edcheung.com/album/album.htm

(http://img392.imageshack.us/img392/1453/aruba05062ja4.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: JE on March 10, 2008, 09:22:31 PM
wasn't it stated somewhere that joran introduced himself to natalee as a dutch student on vacation in aruba?
beth went to the holiday inn asking about a dutch man on vacation and was told that he was a local hanging out at the excelsior casino all the time

From greta's interview with him

VAN DER SLOOT: No, just between me and Natalee. We were speaking English to each other and I asked her if she wanted to go back to her hotel and that's when she said that she wanted to — she asked me if I -- if I had a big house or not and then — then she said — I said to her "Do you want to see my house?" And she's like "Yes, I want to go to your house."

how does this fit in if he first introduced himself as a tourist ?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Observer on March 10, 2008, 09:31:08 PM
wasn't it stated somewhere that joran introduced himself to natalee as a dutch student on vacation in aruba?
beth went to the holiday inn asking about a dutch man on vacation and was told that he was a local hanging out at the excelsior casino all the time

From greta's interview with him

VAN DER SLOOT: No, just between me and Natalee. We were speaking English to each other and I asked her if she wanted to go back to her hotel and that's when she said that she wanted to — she asked me if I -- if I had a big house or not and then — then she said — I said to her "Do you want to see my house?" And she's like "Yes, I want to go to your house."

how does this fit in if he first introduced himself as a tourist ?

It doesn't JE! He told all the MB kids he was 19 from Holland and he was staying at there hotel. He was lying to Greta about what was said and done..If they did talk about anyones house she was too drugged to realize what was going on. There are witnesses in this case that saw them go back into the bar 10 minutes later and escort her out by the elbow,theres even a bartender that says she could barely walk and two of the suspects basicly dragged her out of the bar. I don't think Natalee was even conscious longer then 10 minutes in that car and he made up most everything. As soon as she started going unconscious they put on a porno and from that point on the pimp games began :(


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: dennisintn on March 10, 2008, 09:42:35 PM
wasn't it stated somewhere that joran introduced himself to natalee as a dutch student on vacation in aruba?
beth went to the holiday inn asking about a dutch man on vacation and was told that he was a local hanging out at the excelsior casino all the time

From greta's interview with him

VAN DER SLOOT: No, just between me and Natalee. We were speaking English to each other and I asked her if she wanted to go back to her hotel and that's when she said that she wanted to — she asked me if I -- if I had a big house or not and then — then she said — I said to her "Do you want to see my house?" And she's like "Yes, I want to go to your house."

how does this fit in if he first introduced himself as a tourist ?

according to several mb students, he introduced himself as a student on vacation staying at the holiday inn.  he was also supposed to be l9 yrs. old and a soccer player.  i don't think natalee had any intentions of going anywhere else except back to the hotel in a cab along with jvds.  i also think she was drugged by that time by jvds and wasn't clear headed enough to do what she normally would have done.  i do remember reading that at least one of her friends said natalee asked her if she wanted to ride back with them but she all ready had plans to ride with someone else.
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: jackb on March 10, 2008, 09:47:30 PM
Hi Monkey's,
  Just got caught up reading.Watched the video link and listened to Dave and Beth.Seem's Dave thinks it all went down at the Sloots house..Bless his heart and Beth's heart too..One thing I've always wondered about and that is why Dave had to find out from his son that Natalee was missing.I wonder why Beth or Jug didn't call him immediatly..I don't know,just sad...
And you are trying to do what with your question.  Read the books.  Good try.  Not working.     Jack blue


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Observer on March 10, 2008, 09:58:03 PM
Scared Monkeys Protests Aruba at the St. Louis Travel Show in St. Charles, MO and a Show of Unity for Justice…for Natalee Holloway

Travel Blogs, Travel Journals, Travelogues, Travel Diaries - TravelPod since 1997 wrote an interesting post today on
Here’s a quick excerpt
Once again there was a travel show, this time the St Louis Travel Show 2008, in St Charles, MO. Once again Scared Monkeys was present protesting Aruba and providing a show of Unity for Justice … for Natalee Holloway and all US citizens missing/murdered in foreign countries. Concerned individuals showed at the 2008 St. Louis Travel Show to provide a voice for Natalee Holloway and remind all travelers that Aruba has still done nothing to provide … Justice for Natalee. It would appear from report

http://tinyurl.com/2syno9


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: jackb on March 10, 2008, 09:59:31 PM

i didn't surprise me on the one hand, but i was surprised it never really came out. also, earlier you posted something about the dog incident and it mentioned a merryweather. i suspect this may be sidney merryweather. similar age, wonder if we can somehow verify the dog thing.

http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=107036794 (http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=107036794)
[/quote
Well the entire Van Der Sloot and Hugen Family has been quiet,we don't even know which ones are paul's brothers or why him and his son are so protected. They know the names of all of Dave's kids,every MB student and everything about Natalee and her Family. Very little has come out for obvious reasons as we know years ago Van Der Straten use to work for PVDS,the more thats unraveled the more disgusted we will all be by how well he knows everyone that was involved. It is probably true with the two Judges Wit and Smit as well. It would not suprise me if other Fathers of the pimps influenced the Investigation in Aruba also.

Peter De Vries also reported about Joran killing his own dog in his first show and I take it as a fact. He killed his own pet dumped it in the Moko pond and tried to blame it on this kid. However there probably is no police record of that thanks to Van Der Straten and Pauls friends in the ALE. We saw a similar thingnder from the reports of the 3 girls who said they were drugged and assaulted by Joran,they went to the police and nothing was done. They came forward again after Natalee dissapeared but then  stepped back after Dennis Jacobs talked to them. When the KLPD looked into this,her Psychiatrist said that she was drugged and abused by Joran,but Dennis Jacobs said she was not willing to come forward because she was still in love with Joran  ::MonkeyNoNo::
Johan Va nderstratten should be arrested and put UNDER the jail.  Had he been doing the job he was supposed to do, that island would not be the mess it is.  As well many people, including NH would  be alive and many would not have been robbed, raped and abused.
    Jack Blue


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 10, 2008, 10:05:21 PM

Beth and Dave learn from the MB students that Joran had introduced himself as a student from Holland.  Why would Natalee be inquiring if Joran lived in a "big house".

As Art Wood implies ... all the Aruban authorities have to do is pay attention to Joran's lies.  Lies are created to cover the truth.  Inquiring minds ask ... what truth is Joran attempting to cover.

Janet

++++++++++

Beth Holloway
LOVING NATALEE


Page 30 - The last information communicated from the students before they boad their plane is that this Joran guy is a tourist from Holland.  An he is taying at the Holiday Inn.

Page 39 - Following our brief conversation, we all walk immediately to the fron desk to ask about someone named Joran who is staying in the hotel and plays in the casino here.  The Holiday Inn night manager, Brenda, knows him by name.  "Oh! yes ... yes ... Joran.  He gambles in the Excelsior Casino here.  He likes to prey on young female tourists.  Especially the blonds.  He is tall.  Good-looking boy.  Like a Dutch marine."  My mouth drops wide open.  "Where is he from?" I ask her.  She replies.  "He lives in Aruba."  I stutter.  "He's ... he's not a tourist just here for the summer?"  "Non, non," she says.

It takes a few moments to absorb this information.  The supposed tourist who befriended some of Natalee's classmates and who told them he was staying at their hotel lied tothem.  He isn't a tourist.  He isn't styaing here.


Dave Holloway
NANCY GRACE
June 27, 2005


DAVE HOLLOWAY, NATALEE`S FATHER: I did not have the opportunity to speak with her friends, but later on, I did find out that Joran had indicated to the group that he was a student visiting here from Holland. And the group thought he was a guest at the Holiday Inn.

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0507/27/ng.01.html


Joran van der Sloot
On the Record w/ Greta
March 6, 2006


VAN SUSTEREN: Any discussion between Carlos 'nCharlie's and the car between you and Satish or you and Natalee?

VAN DER SLOOT: No, just between me and Natalee. We were speaking English to each other and I asked her if she wanted to go back to her hotel and that's when she said that she wanted to — she asked me if I -- if I had a big house or not and then — then she said — I said to her "Do you want to see my house?" And she's like "Yes, I want to go to your house."

VAN SUSTEREN: All right, so the plan I assume was that, I mean you were interested in her at least I assume, correct me if I'm wrong, that you would take her back and have some sort of relationship with her at that point?

VAN DER SLOOT: Yes.

VAN SUSTEREN: Ever talk about it, about whether you were going to have sex or anything like that?

VAN DER SLOOT: No, not actually talk about it, no, but not like she said no. "Do you want to have sex?" No, it wasn't anything like that.

VAN SUSTEREN: That was your intention and you were hopeful that was her intention?

VAN DER SLOOT: Yes.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,186581,00.html


Art Wood
'Rita Cosby Live & Direct'
December 1, 2005


WOOD: ... To solve this case, just follow the lies, Rita.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10295536/




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: texasmom on March 10, 2008, 10:06:18 PM
The Persistence is completing its last leg of the journey home.  It should arrive some time on Wed.  Incredibly, the Persistence never saw anything over 4ft seas the entire way from Aruba to Mexico with 2kt currents and the wind at its stern - it made awesome time.  It had to spend a few days in Mexico where it refueled until the Gulf calmed down, but it's good to go now.  Thanks for all the prayers. 


Glad Persistence is having a safe voyage back. Something evil about the waters of Aruba, very reflective of the government, law enforcement. tourism authority and judicial system, pure evil.
:smt045  I agree, PURE EVIL!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Observer on March 10, 2008, 10:07:08 PM
Natalee Holloway Underwater Search Crew Headed Home

The crew of the "Persistence" left Louisiana in November...headed to Aruba. They've been using sonar and underwater robots to search Aruba's ocean floor for Natalee Holloway since mid -December.

It's been an expensive process - a search like this costs about $50,000 a day, according to search supervisor Tim Trahan. After three months of searching - the search party is simply out of money, but they're not out of places to look for Natalee. Trahan says the crew has used sonar to photograph almost 1000 miles of Aruba's ocean floor. Underwater robots have dove down and inspected hundreds of suspicious objects. The crew still has 150 objects left to inspect.

The "Persistence" is due home around Wednesday, but the crew says their search isn't over - just delayed. They'll now concentrate on looking for money and trying to work their way back to Aruba and what they hope will be answers.

http://tinyurl.com/ynoxqd


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: jackb on March 10, 2008, 10:08:46 PM
I must with Dave that the Sloot residence played an important role.  What's the consensus here...

To what extent was the VDS residence used in NH's dissapearance?
Hi Ocean,good to see you all made it back home safe.

Considering that the van der sloots decided it was a GOOD thing to give their wayward,sicko,out of control son a line of credit at the casinos and carlos&Charlies bar,and his own little private party pad at the age of 15.....I'd say joran used his little apartment for sex parties,and that he took Natalee there(like he took all of his girls there,with his parents approval),Natalee was raped and over drugged and died there.Then they possibly moved her around the dirty little island a couple of times then out to sea.

Karma ... the following segment was taken from the New York lawsuit brought again Paulus and Joran van der Sloot by Beth Twitty and Dave Holloway. 

Janet

++++++++++++

HELEN LEJUEZ - ARUBAN FAMILY ATTORNEY

Affidavid of C. Helen Lejuez

<snipped>

5. ... Miss Doe told me that she was coming forward at that time because she had had an experience that might be similar to Natalee's experience.

6. Miss Doe informed me that, one evening during early in 2005, she met Joran van der Sloot at Carlos'n Charlie's nightclub in Aruba.

7. Miss Doe told me that, over the course of the night, Joran van der Sloot gave her several alcoholic beverages. Miss Doe further stated that she believes that Joran van der Sloot placed some kind of narcotic substance in one of her drinks. The reason she believes she was drugged is that her level of intoxication was greatly disportionate to the amount of alcohol that she consumed.

8. Later that night, according to Miss Doe, Joran Van der Sloot brought Miss Doe back to his apartment, adjacent to his parent's house.

9. Miss Doe then told me that she was sexually assaulted by Joran van der Sloot as she faded in and out of conciousness, At no time did Miss Doe consent to any sexual contact with Joran van der Sloot.

10. Miss Doe advised me that, shortly after she was sexually assaulted by Joran van der Sloot, she learned that two other young women, ages 16 and 17, suffered attacks by Joran van der Sloot under similar circumstances.  
11. Miss Doe told me that, in the aftermath of Joran van der Sloot's attack on Miss Doe, she was threatened and intimidated by Joran van der Sloot, his friends and others. She had been terrified to come forward and tell her story in Aruba.


Jossy Mansur
'Scarborough Country'
August 26, 2005


DANIELS:  It definitely smells that way.  You know, if you take the prosecution‘s statement at its face, we are talking on a whole new level, the charges here.  We are talking about drugs.  We are talking about rape and we are talking about rape of many different people.  There are four guys now in custody, four best friends.  What does that tell you?
 
MANSUR:  Well, what it tells me is that, really, these four guys are friends.  They belong to the same group, these party boys that go out and prey on young, unsuspected girls or other kinds of girls also that are out to have a good time, not suspecting what they‘re in for with these predators around.

And they are—they not only appear in photographs together, but I understand that Freddy lives very near to the Joran house.  So, there is a bond between them.  There is a group that they call themselves the pimps, in which all of these participate.
Thank you Janet.
The pimps of aruba live on it seems,I wonder if they were taught this game by their Daddy's.

I said this the other night (i am like Klaas "Nobody ever listens to me") but I believe this could have been an initiation into the pimps for the younger boys as this group would be moving on (except Satish who stil hasn't graduated from high school).

 
   Actually I somewhat do to and the Lamb was Valentijn who ran away.  Joran is no lamb.  NH probably was a virgin until they took her first.  Someone may have let it slip out of the MB group that she was and Joran and friends took that as a cue to kidnap her and teach her a lesson.  I have always thought that Joran's younger brother knows about this and was maybe even disgusted by it all, and the father is more trying to protect him than that sorry azzed (as is Palus) son of hisj. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: jackb on March 10, 2008, 10:13:41 PM
she was still in love with Joran  ::MonkeyNoNo::

on drugs maybe, otherwise...  ::MonkeyNoNo:: in love with joran....who is she lilly munster? i wish devries would dig around on jacobs and van der stratten.
       

Why is this avatar showing it's azz?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Observer on March 10, 2008, 10:16:18 PM
The MOB involved in Casino's..Say it isn't so!!!!!!!!!  ::MonkeyNoNo:: I guess paying off people like Rudy Croes and the Aruban Govt was worth every penny for the Chicago Outfit..They don't have to worry about Gaming Commissions like the Mobsters out of Pennsylvania have to deal with.

Priest arrested on perjury charges in alleged mob case

# Story Highlights
# The Rev. Joseph Sica, 52, was arrested outside his home Wednesday
# He is an adviser to a resort owner who is subject of the grand jury probe
# Probe centers on whether owner gave false information about his alleged mob ties
# The priest told a grand jury that he had no relationship with the resort owner

http://www.cnn.com/2008/CRIME/01/02/grandjury.slots.ap/index.html?eref=rss_law


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: texasmom on March 10, 2008, 10:17:02 PM

[/quote
Well the entire Van Der Sloot and Hugen Family has been quiet,we don't even know which ones are paul's brothers or why him and his son are so protected. They know the names of all of Dave's kids,every MB student and everything about Natalee and her Family. Very little has come out for obvious reasons as we know years ago Van Der Straten use to work for PVDS,the more thats unraveled the more disgusted we will all be by how well he knows everyone that was involved. It is probably true with the two Judges Wit and Smit as well. It would not suprise me if other Fathers of the pimps influenced the Investigation in Aruba also.

Peter De Vries also reported about Joran killing his own dog in his first show and I take it as a fact. He killed his own pet dumped it in the Moko pond and tried to blame it on this kid. However there probably is no police record of that thanks to Van Der Straten and Pauls friends in the ALE. We saw a similar thingnder from the reports of the 3 girls who said they were drugged and assaulted by Joran,they went to the police and nothing was done. They came forward again after Natalee dissapeared but then  stepped back after Dennis Jacobs talked to them. When the KLPD looked into this,her Psychiatrist said that she was drugged and abused by Joran,but Dennis Jacobs said she was not willing to come forward because she was still in love with Joran  ::MonkeyNoNo::
Johan Va nderstratten should be arrested and put UNDER the jail.  Had he been doing the job he was supposed to do, that island would not be the mess it is.  As well many people, including NH would  be alive and many would not have been robbed, raped and abused.
    Jack Blue
I agree Jack Blue, except I would add that Dennis Jacobs fat ass should be right on top of Vanderstraaten, with BOTH OF THEIR "disgrace to the field of law enforcement" asses UNDER THE JAIL!  I'm trying not to picture that, but that is what should be done.
 ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: hotping on March 10, 2008, 10:24:38 PM

[/quote
Well the entire Van Der Sloot and Hugen Family has been quiet,we don't even know which ones are paul's brothers or why him and his son are so protected. They know the names of all of Dave's kids,every MB student and everything about Natalee and her Family. Very little has come out for obvious reasons as we know years ago Van Der Straten use to work for PVDS,the more thats unraveled the more disgusted we will all be by how well he knows everyone that was involved. It is probably true with the two Judges Wit and Smit as well. It would not suprise me if other Fathers of the pimps influenced the Investigation in Aruba also.

Peter De Vries also reported about Joran killing his own dog in his first show and I take it as a fact. He killed his own pet dumped it in the Moko pond and tried to blame it on this kid. However there probably is no police record of that thanks to Van Der Straten and Pauls friends in the ALE. We saw a similar thingnder from the reports of the 3 girls who said they were drugged and assaulted by Joran,they went to the police and nothing was done. They came forward again after Natalee dissapeared but then  stepped back after Dennis Jacobs talked to them. When the KLPD looked into this,her Psychiatrist said that she was drugged and abused by Joran,but Dennis Jacobs said she was not willing to come forward because she was still in love with Joran  ::MonkeyNoNo::
Johan Va nderstratten should be arrested and put UNDER the jail.  Had he been doing the job he was supposed to do, that island would not be the mess it is.  As well many people, including NH would  be alive and many would not have been robbed, raped and abused.
    Jack Blue
I agree Jack Blue, except I would add that Dennis Jacobs fat ass should be right on top of Vanderstraaten, with BOTH OF THEIR "disgrace to the field of law enforcement" asses UNDER THE JAIL!  I'm trying not to picture that, but that is what should be done.
 ::MonkeyCool::
Yep! You Got It!  ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Observer on March 10, 2008, 10:26:49 PM
Bill O'Reilly Tries To Entertain Orlando Bankers


Maybe O'Reilly was trying to compete with his pal Dennis Miller when he stood in front of an audience of bankers in Orlando and made some mean spirited and tasteless comments that he thought would get a laugh. 10/10/08

In an effort to put down Obama he joked that the Senator would probably want to talk to Chavez.

"If Obama and Chavez meet in Aruba, maybe it would lead to something, maybe something would get done. Maybe they'll find Natalee Holloway, or something."


Claiming as always he's an Independent, BOR told his audience that he was sure Bin Laden wouldn't vote for John McCain. Sounds pretty Republican to me. Guess the Orlando bankers are in sync with Bill because he was a big hit.

http://tinyurl.com/2v4zdj


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Red on March 10, 2008, 10:34:51 PM
SCARED MONKEYS MEDIA ALERT ... MEDIA ALERT ... SCARED MONKEYS MEDIA ALERT ... MEDIA ALERT ...

This is a bit off topic but I wanted to give everyone a heads up on one of Dana's guests tomorrow night on Scared Monkeys radio:

In an exclusive internet/satellite radio interview Dana Pretzer will have on The Dana Pretzer Show, Former Bolingbrook Police Sgt Drew Peterson. Joining Drew Peterson will be his his attorney Joel Brodsky.

This should be interesting. Don't miss this interview. One wife dead by what coroners are saying is drowning by homicide and another wife missing, Drew Peterson ... will be on Scared Monkeys radio ... tune in at 8pm EDT tomorrow night.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 10, 2008, 10:38:34 PM
SCARED MONKEYS MEDIA ALERT ... MEDIA ALERT ... SCARED MONKEYS MEDIA ALERT ... MEDIA ALERT ...

This is a bit off topic but I wanted to give everyone a heads up on one of Dana's guests tomorrow night on Scared Monkeys radio:

In an exclusive internet/satellite radio interview Dana Pretzer will have on The Dana Pretzer Show, Former Bolingbrook Police Sgt Drew Peterson. Joining Drew Peterson will be his his attorney Joel Brodsky.

This should be interesting. Don't miss this interview. One wife dead by what coroners are saying is drowning by homicide and another wife missing, Drew Peterson ... will be on Scared Monkeys radio ... tune in at 8pm EDT tomorrow night.



Can we call him with questions?  LOLOL   ::MonkeyHaHa:: 

VERY COOL!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 10, 2008, 10:39:17 PM


I get the impression that Joran's confession was a real thorn in Hans' side. He had successfully closed the case without having to go to trial. Life was good for Hans. Then Joran congesses and makes him have to look like he's busy again.

Poor Hans.


You got that right! Not only Hans but Rudy Croes,Wit and everyone else! They went on record as happy as could be..Don't feel bad Americans..Even though the case is closed and they are released as suspects..It can still be reopened if in the next 12 years if Major new evidence is found like Natalee's body,forensic evidence that we destroyed or if the ocean suddenly goes dry..The only ones they are Mad at is Joran for screwing up and anyone that tries to get the truth out of him.

Heck even Judge Wit came out of his closet after the case closed to defend himself,he said about the same thing that there is major suspicions,and some evidence,all you need is something major like forensic evidence or her body..Good luck with that! However he made the situation worse when he tried to point fingers at the OM for never asking to search more than Jorans little Apt and accused Dompig of Obstruction of Justice when defending his unbelievable rulings.


Yep, here you have a clear case of the Prosecutor/Police Chief lying to the media or the Dutch Judge lying to the media. There is no gray area here, one or more are lying and Hans Mos sits on his ass.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 10, 2008, 10:41:23 PM
Natalee Holloway Underwater Search Crew Headed Home

The crew of the "Persistence" left Louisiana in November...headed to Aruba. They've been using sonar and underwater robots to search Aruba's ocean floor for Natalee Holloway since mid -December.

It's been an expensive process - a search like this costs about $50,000 a day, according to search supervisor Tim Trahan. After three months of searching - the search party is simply out of money, but they're not out of places to look for Natalee. Trahan says the crew has used sonar to photograph almost 1000 miles of Aruba's ocean floor. Underwater robots have dove down and inspected hundreds of suspicious objects. The crew still has 150 objects left to inspect.

The "Persistence" is due home around Wednesday, but the crew says their search isn't over - just delayed. They'll now concentrate on looking for money and trying to work their way back to Aruba and what they hope will be answers.

http://tinyurl.com/ynoxqd

Thanks *******.

I hope with all my heart that when the crew of the Persistence returns ... the search will be conducted independently and ... not under the "guidance" of the Aruban police ... Aruban authorities ... Aruban prosecutor or ... an Aruban dive team.  In other words ... I hope the search will exclude the "powers that be" who have been behind the Aruban coverup ... the Aruban coverup that has denied Natalee Holloway justice by distancing Paulus and Joran van der Sloot from implication ... the Aruban coverup that has put a family throught a H--- on Earth for almost three years.

Think about it.  The enemy is not about to assist in furthering a quest to find Natalee's remains ... a guest that does not adhere to the coverup agenda.

IMO

Sincerely, Janet

++++++++++++


Jug Twitty
NANCY GRACE
October 4, 2005


JUG TWITTY: Nancy, what happened -- well, I think it was probably about 30 days after, or so, maybe the 1st of July or something. I had a meeting with Van Der Straaten, who was the police chief in charge at that time. And I went in and sat down with him and told him and Officer Sanboe (ph), who was going to take over for Van Der Straaten. He was there, too.

You know, I asked a question about, I understand that there was a statement made by Joran, where he talks about what he had done to Natalee and he described in very graphic detail, like, the stitching and embroidery and everything on Natalee`s underwear. And he goes, Oh, no, no, no. Absolutely not. Absolutely not. Well, little did he know I had just read the statements where Joran describes that to the "T," you know, two days before. But of course, I didn`t tell him that. But that`s just when I started to think something`s wrong here.

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0510/04/ng.01.html


Beth Twitty
'Scarborough Country'
October 21, 2005


HOLLOWAY TWITTY: They never—they never wanted to implicate these three young men.  They never wanted to implicate them from the beginning. And there is a list of reasons, you know, why we know that is true.

http://msnbc.msn.com/id/9796403/from/RL.2/


Beth Twitty
The Sun
January 29, 2007


Twitty recalled the first days after her daughter's disappearance and the actions of the Aruban government.

"We did everything we could in looking for her.  There was a government coverup, and it has been documented," Twitty contended. "Yet we have remained respectful and have done the right thing."

http://www.jonesborosun.com/story.php?ID=25809


Jug Twitty
'Scarborough Country'
August 11, 2005


TWITTY: ... but when they take my statement 33 days later, and they take the other guys‘ statements that were with me and ladies that were with me, you know, like 19 days later, it‘s like they didn‘t want to find the truth.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8925176/


Beth Twitty
'Rita Cosby Live & Direct'
December 5, 2005


TWITTY: ... Remember, within the first 24 hours, we knew who the suspects were. We knew the persons that Natalee were taken from Carlos and Charlie‘s. We knew the license plate of the gray Honda they placed her in. We knew the condition that Natalee was in. We knew the behavior or the conduct in which they engaged in with Natalee.

And then not only that, Jane, within 72 hours, we knew that their first story was totally fabricated, that within the first 72 hours, I faced a room of 12 -- at least 12 detectives, Aruban and Dutch detectives, and a lead detective, Dennis Jacobs (ph), and they knew after we reviewed video footage from the Holiday Inn casino lobby that my daughter had never been brought back to the Holiday Inn. They knew that those suspects were fabricating a story from day one.

<snipped>

TWITTY: Well, Jane, something that the family knew—and we have to keep reminding everyone—after 72 hours -- 72 hours—we knew definitively that these suspects were not telling the truth. We knew that my daughter had never been brought back to the Holiday Inn. Of course we were becoming frustrated. Who wouldn‘t, at this point? You know, we—and what was so unbelievable about this, is they knew this information and still chose to pursue the two security guards on June the 5th.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10348437/


Beth Twitty
DR. PHIL SHOW
January 29, 2006


BETH: There are times when we're thinking that we need to continue, and of course we're still searching for answers, but it's this rollercoaster ride. And it makes me so angry, Dr. Phil, when I let myself fall for information coming out of an official who represents the island of Aruba. If somebody presents you with false hope and false information, it's devastating.

http://www.drphil.com/slideshows/slideshow/3041/?id=1&slide=3&null=null


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: jackb on March 10, 2008, 10:49:15 PM
Question:
Why would multiple legal professionals jeopardize their careers, livelihood, and freedom to cover for the VDSs?

-All very close friends?
- PvdS has dirt on them all and willing to use it as leverage?
- Blackmail?
 

Most likely bound together by their sorriness and bad habits and knowing scud on each other and appear more to be elite just for staying within the sorriness of the clan.  Sorry people seek their own level.  It probably has little to do with social standing.  It is just that most of the ones who know dirt on each other showed their habits within their own clubs and organizations and bind together out of fear of blackmail of each other.   Jack Blue

All very close friends.  Dutch elitists. Cannot associate with anyone beneath them. Must believe whatever comes from their mouths.  Mind-set of the Dutch/Aruban.  Must never go against one of your own when it is an American involved.  Nothing more than the U.S. has had thrown at us for years.  We are the Cowboys, they are the wronged party.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Observer on March 10, 2008, 10:52:22 PM
SCARED MONKEYS MEDIA ALERT ... MEDIA ALERT ... SCARED MONKEYS MEDIA ALERT ... MEDIA ALERT ...

This is a bit off topic but I wanted to give everyone a heads up on one of Dana's guests tomorrow night on Scared Monkeys radio:

In an exclusive internet/satellite radio interview Dana Pretzer will have on The Dana Pretzer Show, Former Bolingbrook Police Sgt Drew Peterson. Joining Drew Peterson will be his his attorney Joel Brodsky.

This should be interesting. Don't miss this interview. One wife dead by what coroners are saying is drowning by homicide and another wife missing, Drew Peterson ... will be on Scared Monkeys radio ... tune in at 8pm EDT tomorrow night.



Can we call him with questions?  LOLOL   ::MonkeyHaHa:: 

VERY COOL!

 ::MonkeyEek:: AT the guests on Dana's show

 ::MonkeyEek:: At Klaas's post being edited  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 10, 2008, 10:55:57 PM
SCARED MONKEYS MEDIA ALERT ... MEDIA ALERT ... SCARED MONKEYS MEDIA ALERT ... MEDIA ALERT ...

This is a bit off topic but I wanted to give everyone a heads up on one of Dana's guests tomorrow night on Scared Monkeys radio:

In an exclusive internet/satellite radio interview Dana Pretzer will have on The Dana Pretzer Show, Former Bolingbrook Police Sgt Drew Peterson. Joining Drew Peterson will be his his attorney Joel Brodsky.

This should be interesting. Don't miss this interview. One wife dead by what coroners are saying is drowning by homicide and another wife missing, Drew Peterson ... will be on Scared Monkeys radio ... tune in at 8pm EDT tomorrow night.


 ::MonkeyShocked::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: hotping on March 10, 2008, 10:57:35 PM
SCARED MONKEYS MEDIA ALERT ... MEDIA ALERT ... SCARED MONKEYS MEDIA ALERT ... MEDIA ALERT ...

This is a bit off topic but I wanted to give everyone a heads up on one of Dana's guests tomorrow night on Scared Monkeys radio:

In an exclusive internet/satellite radio interview Dana Pretzer will have on The Dana Pretzer Show, Former Bolingbrook Police Sgt Drew Peterson. Joining Drew Peterson will be his his attorney Joel Brodsky.

This should be interesting. Don't miss this interview. One wife dead by what coroners are saying is drowning by homicide and another wife missing, Drew Peterson ... will be on Scared Monkeys radio ... tune in at 8pm EDT tomorrow night.


  ::MonkeyEek:: ::MonkeyNoNo:: ::MonkeyEek::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 10, 2008, 11:01:44 PM
wasn't it stated somewhere that joran introduced himself to natalee as a dutch student on vacation in aruba?
beth went to the holiday inn asking about a dutch man on vacation and was told that he was a local hanging out at the excelsior casino all the time

From greta's interview with him

VAN DER SLOOT: No, just between me and Natalee. We were speaking English to each other and I asked her if she wanted to go back to her hotel and that's when she said that she wanted to — she asked me if I -- if I had a big house or not and then — then she said — I said to her "Do you want to see my house?" And she's like "Yes, I want to go to your house."

how does this fit in if he first introduced himself as a tourist ?


JE, first you have to understand that before Greta interviewed him he had already told the police at least 35 lies. By the time Greta talked to him he had already told at least five versions of how he got home that night. It is on the FBI record and numerous other places that he posed as a tourist and lied about his age to the Mountain Brook kids.

Joran was stalking them. He lied to conceal his true identity. By saying he was a Dutch tourist staying at the Holiday Inn he was able to convince Natalee he was just giving her a cab ride back to the hotel she was staying at. That's how he was able to carve her out of the crowd.

He's a predator.

If Joran's statements don't add up it's because you can't put a square peg in a round hole. He has found a way to beat the Dutch system however. Just lie your ass off and and the police, prosecutor and judges get so confused they can't do their job.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 10, 2008, 11:03:17 PM
SCARED MONKEYS MEDIA ALERT ... MEDIA ALERT ... SCARED MONKEYS MEDIA ALERT ... MEDIA ALERT ...

This is a bit off topic but I wanted to give everyone a heads up on one of Dana's guests tomorrow night on Scared Monkeys radio:

In an exclusive internet/satellite radio interview Dana Pretzer will have on The Dana Pretzer Show, Former Bolingbrook Police Sgt Drew Peterson. Joining Drew Peterson will be his his attorney Joel Brodsky.

This should be interesting. Don't miss this interview. One wife dead by what coroners are saying is drowning by homicide and another wife missing, Drew Peterson ... will be on Scared Monkeys radio ... tune in at 8pm EDT tomorrow night.



Can we call him with questions?  LOLOL   ::MonkeyHaHa:: 

VERY COOL!

 ::MonkeyEek:: AT the guests on Dana's show

 ::MonkeyEek:: At Klaas's post being edited  ::MonkeyWink::

We were editing the time, it's 8PM and not the usual 9PM.  Actually Red and I were both trying to edit at the same time, Red won...LOL  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: dennisintn on March 10, 2008, 11:05:23 PM

rudy croes and ed briesen were all for mos and a.l.e. listening to the psychotic psychics and their lies and anyone else who blamed natalee's disappearance on natalee or her family and friends.  he was quite happy with the situation until jvds blew his own reputation as well as that of aruba out of the water. when rudy got mad and unofficially declared jvds persona non grata, it wasn't because of what everyone knows he did to natalee, but for how bad jvds made the island govt. look and the bad publicity he brought to the island. 
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Observer on March 10, 2008, 11:15:58 PM
Looks like 2 murders today in Aruba  ::MonkeyEek::

The other article mentions the show in Aruba being canceled..The Persistence leaving to Louisiana and the Millions they spent with no results on Natalees case..I think  ::MonkeyHaHa::

(http://img352.imageshack.us/img352/3527/asisinojk7.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Shell on March 10, 2008, 11:16:01 PM


One of the few times we have heard Chief Dolf Richardson say jack he said that he believed they never were at the beach but very well could have been at the Van der Sloot house. Of course that was almost two years ago and Dolf still hasn't done jack.

De Vries said his ALE sources told him the same thing in 2006,he said then that they don't think they ever went to the Beach but went to the VDS house and something happened by the garden. If you look at all the early NE articles they say there ALE source thinks she was drugged and taken back to the house. Here we are in 2008,they have 24 detectives on the case,Mos is blaming Natalee's Family and the American Media but yet we were closer to solving this on June 10th 2005  ::MonkeyConfused::

I think that the Sloots laid back attitude towards their eldest came back to bite them in the buttocks. Party at Sloots got out of hand. MHO but I could be wrong.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: jackb on March 10, 2008, 11:25:34 PM
Question:
Why would multiple legal professionals jeopardize their careers, livelihood, and freedom to cover for the VDSs?

-All very close friends?
- PvdS has dirt on them all and willing to use it as leverage?
- Blackmail?
 
Most likely bound together by their sorriness and bad habits and knowing scud on each other and appear more to be elite just for staying within the sorriness of the clan.  Sorry people seek their own level.  It probably has little to do with social standing.  It is just that most of the ones who know dirt on each other showed their habits within their own clubs and organizations and bind together out of fear of blackmail of each other.   Jack Blue
   

Most likely bound together by their sorriness and bad habits and knowing scud on each other and appear more to be elite just for staying within the sorriness of the clan.  Sorry people seek their own level.  It probably has little to do with social standing.  It is just that most of the ones who know dirt on each other showed their habits within their own clubs and organizations and bind together out of fear of blackmail of each other.   Jack Blue

All very close friends.  Dutch elitists. Cannot associate with anyone beneath them. Must believe whatever comes from their mouths.  Mind-set of the Dutch/Aruban.  Must never go against one of your own when it is an American involved.  Nothing more than the U.S. has had thrown at us for years.  We are the Cowboys, they are the wronged party.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: jackb on March 10, 2008, 11:28:55 PM
The MOB involved in Casino's..Say it isn't so!!!!!!!!!  ::MonkeyNoNo:: I guess paying off people like Rudy Croes and the Aruban Govt was worth every penny for the Chicago Outfit..They don't have to worry about Gaming Commissions like the Mobsters out of Pennsylvania have to deal with.

Priest arrested on perjury charges in alleged mob case

# Story Highlights
# The Rev. Joseph Sica, 52, was arrested outside his home Wednesday
# He is an adviser to a resort owner who is subject of the grand jury probe
# Probe centers on whether owner gave false information about his alleged mob ties
# The priest told a grand jury that he had no relationship with the resort owner

http://www.cnn.com/2008/CRIME/01/02/grandjury.slots.ap/index.html?eref=rss_law

Most likely bound together by their sorriness and bad habits and knowing scud on each other and appear more to be elite just for staying within the sorriness of the clan.  Sorry people seek their own level.  It probably has little to do with social standing.  It is just that most of the ones who know dirt on each other showed their habits within their own clubs and organizations and bind together out of fear of blackmail of each other.   Jack Blue


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Shell on March 10, 2008, 11:29:26 PM

i didn't surprise me on the one hand, but i was surprised it never really came out. also, earlier you posted something about the dog incident and it mentioned a merryweather. i suspect this may be sidney merryweather. similar age, wonder if we can somehow verify the dog thing.

http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=107036794 (http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=107036794)
[/quote
Well the entire Van Der Sloot and Hugen Family has been quiet,we don't even know which ones are paul's brothers or why him and his son are so protected. They know the names of all of Dave's kids,every MB student and everything about Natalee and her Family. Very little has come out for obvious reasons as we know years ago Van Der Straten use to work for PVDS,the more thats unraveled the more disgusted we will all be by how well he knows everyone that was involved. It is probably true with the two Judges Wit and Smit as well. It would not suprise me if other Fathers of the pimps influenced the Investigation in Aruba also.

Peter De Vries also reported about Joran killing his own dog in his first show and I take it as a fact. He killed his own pet dumped it in the Moko pond and tried to blame it on this kid. However there probably is no police record of that thanks to Van Der Straten and Pauls friends in the ALE. We saw a similar thingnder from the reports of the 3 girls who said they were drugged and assaulted by Joran,they went to the police and nothing was done. They came forward again after Natalee dissapeared but then  stepped back after Dennis Jacobs talked to them. When the KLPD looked into this,her Psychiatrist said that she was drugged and abused by Joran,but Dennis Jacobs said she was not willing to come forward because she was still in love with Joran  ::MonkeyNoNo::
Johan Va nderstratten should be arrested and put UNDER the jail.  Had he been doing the job he was supposed to do, that island would not be the mess it is.  As well many people, including NH would  be alive and many would not have been robbed, raped and abused.
    Jack Blue

I think so too Jack. And to think one of the Aruban posters was adamant that VdS was so dedicated to justice. That was a bunch of BS, in my opinion.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: jackb on March 10, 2008, 11:32:30 PM


One of the few times we have heard Chief Dolf Richardson say jack he said that he believed they never were at the beach but very well could have been at the Van der Sloot house. Of course that was almost two years ago and Dolf still hasn't done jack.

De Vries said his ALE sources told him the same thing in 2006,he said then that they don't think they ever went to the Beach but went to the VDS house and something happened by the garden. If you look at all the early NE articles they say there ALE source thinks she was drugged and taken back to the house. Here we are in 2008,they have 24 detectives on the case,Mos is blaming Natalee's Family and the American Media but yet we were closer to solving this on June 10th 2005  ::MonkeyConfused::

I think that the Sloots laid back attitude towards their eldest came back to bite them in the buttocks. Party at Sloots got out of hand. MHO but I could be wrong.

Joran may have gone to sleep, Palus came over and started his thing which enraged Joran when he awakened and went babanas.  Anita could have been home and caught Palus.  They are distancing Anita from the scene too.  I believe she was at that house when bad things happened.    Jack blue


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Shell on March 10, 2008, 11:34:37 PM
My apologies for messing up the quotes JackB  ::MonkeyConfused:: I do that sometimes.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Observer on March 10, 2008, 11:46:28 PM
Camera 2 of Pontje and Patrick

http://www.revu.nl/nieuws_varchief


==========================================
Netherlands gets first book Van der Eem

The book which Patrick van der Eem his story about Joran van der Sloot has record is located in the Netherlands earlier in the store than in the United States. Initially, it would be only in the US. Last month it was announced that the infiltrator of crime reporter Peter R. De Vries to Aruba on a book worked.

Foreign Media Books Publishing House late Monday that "Overboord. How I Joran van der Sloot to the talk got around June 25 appears. The English title of the by E.E. Byars written book reads' Disposed '(' Weggewerkt '). The first chapter can be done from Monday already in the house met via mobile phone. Downloading the so-called 'movel "with a text message must be requested.

The Aruban entrepreneur from Almelo was early last month worldwide. In his car with hidden cameras Joran van der Sloot told him several times how he has contracted to Natalee Holloway in the sea to dump. Those images were broadcast in a special broadcast of De Vries by more than seven million people was followed.

Last week, the man who Van der Sloot in his car was still emptying discredited. Following an interview for a television channel claimed Aruban Van der Eem that he knew Joran for years, while he had against De Vries said that they are back in a half an Nijmegen casino for the first time to bump had walked. Also he said they know who the body of Holloway has dumped into the sea. Joran would have offered him money to the name of this man not to reveal. The Aruban presenter was then threatened by Van der Eem when he came out that his words had a camera.


http://www.depers.nl/Binnenland/?ID=180585&ref=rss


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Observer on March 10, 2008, 11:51:43 PM
Something just isn't right about Patrick and this book,I feel like he isn't 100% honest about Joran and these 10 confessions..I sure hope this isn't some type of scam so Joran can buy that house in spain :(


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Observer on March 11, 2008, 12:00:33 AM
   
public ministry wanted one copy of the conversacion of poentje castro cu van der eem email monday, 10 march 2008

public ministry owing to ask send one copy of the conversacion cu one presentador place of television owing to the bottom patrick van der eem.
Van der eem, the dutch aruban cu previously know of draws for joran of van der sloot some afirmacion on desaparicion of natalee holloway, in one declaration of policy in 'a day in bida' will tell cu owing to the fact van der sloot is enough end first time cu peter r. Vries, owing to pidi'e for undercover bay. Ministerio public wanted determines locual being owing to tell precisely door of van der eem. If the conversacion is relevant for one judicial decision in the case against van der sloot, the hour public ministry is the place imagennan also cu together the 'dossier' of punishment of joran van der sloot, according ministerio audience. Now we will investigate locual is the relevance ey! Presentador of television, poentje castro diabierna owing to let know cu van der eem owing to menaz'e cu dead because el'a grab'e scondi! The imagennan still not owing to being present at television of aruba but on youtube if can see this part. Diabierna public ministry owing to the lga know cu conversacionnan filmed among joran van der sloot and van der eem in his car is stop on his self. "The expresionnan recien of van der eem of not less nothing of esaki," according husticia.

http://solodipueblo.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=270&Itemid=1


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: texasmom on March 11, 2008, 12:00:39 AM

Well the entire Van Der Sloot and Hugen Family has been quiet,we don't even know which ones are paul's brothers or why him and his son are so protected. They know the names of all of Dave's kids,every MB student and everything about Natalee and her Family. Very little has come out for obvious reasons as we know years ago Van Der Straten use to work for PVDS,the more thats unraveled the more disgusted we will all be by how well he knows everyone that was involved. It is probably true with the two Judges Wit and Smit as well. It would not suprise me if other Fathers of the pimps influenced the Investigation in Aruba also.

Peter De Vries also reported about Joran killing his own dog in his first show and I take it as a fact. He killed his own pet dumped it in the Moko pond and tried to blame it on this kid. However there probably is no police record of that thanks to Van Der Straten and Pauls friends in the ALE. We saw a similar thingnder from the reports of the 3 girls who said they were drugged and assaulted by Joran,they went to the police and nothing was done. They came forward again after Natalee dissapeared but then  stepped back after Dennis Jacobs talked to them. When the KLPD looked into this,her Psychiatrist said that she was drugged and abused by Joran,but Dennis Jacobs said she was not willing to come forward because she was still in love with Joran  ::MonkeyNoNo::
Johan Va nderstratten should be arrested and put UNDER the jail.  Had he been doing the job he was supposed to do, that island would not be the mess it is.  As well many people, including NH would  be alive and many would not have been robbed, raped and abused.
    Jack Blue
I agree Jack Blue, except I would add that Dennis Jacobs fat ass should be right on top of Vanderstraaten, with BOTH OF THEIR "disgrace to the field of law enforcement" asses UNDER THE JAIL!  I'm trying not to picture that, but that is what should be done.
 ::MonkeyCool::
I "think" I straightened out the quote stack...and I apologize for being mean, I've tried to teach my boys not to be that way so I should try to set a good example.  :oops:



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 11, 2008, 12:06:09 AM
Good Night Monkeys

Janet
9:00 PM


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: hotping on March 11, 2008, 12:16:47 AM
Nite Janet!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 11, 2008, 12:17:39 AM
Nite Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: hotping on March 11, 2008, 12:30:33 AM
Something just isn't right about Patrick and this book,I feel like he isn't 100% honest about Joran and these 10 confessions..I sure hope this isn't some type of scam so Joran can buy that house in spain :(
You know OB I've had the same thoughts about this book deal...but...I'm going to give Patrick the benefit of the doubt only because it appears that Beth trust Him.  ::MonkeyWink:: I Just Pray that its All on the Up and Up!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on March 11, 2008, 12:49:45 AM
I love the shirts, the monkeys, and the girl!

 ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 11, 2008, 12:51:34 AM
I love the shirts, the monkeys, and the girl!

 ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

 ::MonkeyWink:: I see you found them!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Shell on March 11, 2008, 01:07:33 AM
Something just isn't right about Patrick and this book,I feel like he isn't 100% honest about Joran and these 10 confessions..I sure hope this isn't some type of scam so Joran can buy that house in spain :(

That would suck. Lets hope that is not the case.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Shell on March 11, 2008, 01:11:32 AM
Oh my, I meant to say that would stink. A lot about this case reeks. Where is the embarrassed monkey?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: texasmom on March 11, 2008, 01:17:24 AM
For now I am give Patrick Van der Eem the benefit of the doubt.  All information that discredits him that I'm aware of has come from Poentje Castro's show on Aruban television, and sketchy translations of it. 

Peter R. Devries has a very good reputation in his field as a crime reporter and as far as I know he has supported Patrick to this point.   Last week Peter, Patrick, Beth, and Bram Moszkowicz, all appeared on the Robert Jensen show. There was no indication of a problem with Patrick's status as a contributor attempting to resolve this case.  At this point I don't believe that Patrick has known Joran for years, or that his work with Peter was a set-up by him and Joran.  I don't believe that the whole story of what happened to Natalee was shown in the Dutch or the US showings of the recordings of Joran's conversations with Patrick.  However I do believe that many eyes were opened to the true nature of Joran Vandersloot through his words, his tone, and his body language.  In almost three years this had not been accomplished by anyone.  I know that Patrick has a criminal past, he's admitted that.  And frankly, that doesn't matter to me.  If indeed more was learned than was revealed and Devries was not aware of it, I think we will hear about it eventually.  Peter and Patrick had both met with Hans Mos before the airing of Castro's show, and as far as I know Patrick has not been requested to return for another interview since.  Mos may have already had the information revealed in the secret recording of Patrick by Castro. 

I am suspicious of Castro's motives in producing the show to begin with.  Has he done anything in an effort for justice in this case before he felt inclined to discredit the man who helped show the world Joran Vandersloot's true colors? 

With more information, my opinion may change regarding Patrick Van der Eem, but for now I still appreciate what he's done.  Just my opinion. 
 ::MonkeyCool::
 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 11, 2008, 01:17:38 AM
Shell  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: hotping on March 11, 2008, 01:27:36 AM
For now I am give Patrick Van der Eem the benefit of the doubt.  All information that discredits him that I'm aware of has come from Poentje Castro's show on Aruban television, and sketchy translations of it. 

Peter R. Devries has a very good reputation in his field as a crime reporter and as far as I know he has supported Patrick to this point.   Last week Peter, Patrick, Beth, and Bram Moszkowicz, all appeared on the Robert Jensen show. There was no indication of a problem with Patrick's status as a contributor attempting to resolve this case.  At this point I don't believe that Patrick has known Joran for years, or that his work with Peter was a set-up by him and Joran.  I don't believe that the whole story of what happened to Natalee was shown in the Dutch or the US showings of the recordings of Joran's conversations with Patrick.  However I do believe that many eyes were opened to the true nature of Joran Vandersloot through his words, his tone, and his body language.  In almost three years this had not been accomplished by anyone.  I know that Patrick has a criminal past, he's admitted that.  And frankly, that doesn't matter to me.  If indeed more was learned than was revealed and Devries was not aware of it, I think we will hear about it eventually.  Peter and Patrick had both met with Hans Mos before the airing of Castro's show, and as far as I know Patrick has not been requested to return for another interview since.  Mos may have already had the information revealed in the secret recording of Patrick by Castro. 

I am suspicious of Castro's motives in producing the show to begin with.  Has he done anything in an effort for justice in this case before he felt inclined to discredit the man who helped show the world Joran Vandersloot's true colors? 

With more information, my opinion may change regarding Patrick Van der Eem, but for now I still appreciate what he's done.  Just my opinion. 
 ::MonkeyCool::
 

Very Thoughtful Post TM! I Agree!  ::MonkeyWink:: ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: hotping on March 11, 2008, 01:29:22 AM
Oh my, I meant to say that would stink. A lot about this case reeks. Where is the embarrassed monkey?
  ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 11, 2008, 01:32:01 AM
Someone just posted an observation at RU.  Moonshadows aka K Hemmingway hasn't posted at RU since Joran's confession.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Observer on March 11, 2008, 01:39:52 AM
Someone just posted an observation at RU.  Moonshadows aka K Hemmingway hasn't posted at RU since Joran's confession.

I hear she's been busy banning people at the private hate site FOB2 ;)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: greeneyedlady on March 11, 2008, 01:50:01 AM
Someone just posted an observation at RU.  Moonshadows aka K Hemmingway hasn't posted at RU since Joran's confession.

I hear she's been busy banning people at the private hate site FOB2 ;)

Yeah me too. I also hear this Rene person that's writing this documertary about Beth is posting at FOB2 also, cause it's a private board. :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 11, 2008, 01:55:30 AM
Someone just posted an observation at RU.  Moonshadows aka K Hemmingway hasn't posted at RU since Joran's confession.

I hear she's been busy banning people at the private hate site FOB2 ;)

Yeah me too. I also hear this Rene person that's writing this documertary about Beth is posting at FOB2 also, cause it's a private board. :wink:

No surprise there, lol  ::MonkeyHaHa::  They are regrouping to figure out their next campaign.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: greeneyedlady on March 11, 2008, 01:58:03 AM
Someone just posted an observation at RU.  Moonshadows aka K Hemmingway hasn't posted at RU since Joran's confession.

I hear she's been busy banning people at the private hate site FOB2 ;)

Yeah me too. I also hear this Rene person that's writing this documertary about Beth is posting at FOB2 also, cause it's a private board. :wink:

No surprise there, lol  ::MonkeyHaHa::  They are regrouping to figure out their next campaign.

I do believe you're spot on about that Klaas. ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 11, 2008, 02:02:02 AM
Think I'm going to go play some games then watch the news.

GOODNIGHT ALL!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: hotping on March 11, 2008, 02:06:07 AM
Good Night Klaas!

I found them to BH...The T-Shirts are Really Kool! Thanks for posting about Them! I had not seen them before Your post... ::MonkeyWink::  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: texasmom on March 11, 2008, 02:33:36 AM
 

Very Thoughtful Post TM! I Agree!  ::MonkeyWink:: ::MonkeyCool::

Thanks PC!  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: texasmom on March 11, 2008, 02:36:39 AM
Think I'm going to go play some games then watch the news.

GOODNIGHT ALL!

Goodnight Klaas!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Observer on March 11, 2008, 02:41:26 AM
Dutch Bloggers:

Just curious but why do people at FOK call RU the the blog in Ann Arbor Michigan? I have seen 3 times posters at FOK call it that...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: texasmom on March 11, 2008, 02:42:57 AM
I love the shirts, the monkeys, and the girl!

 ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

Me too! ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: hotping on March 11, 2008, 02:48:03 AM
 

Very Thoughtful Post TM! I Agree!  ::MonkeyWink:: ::MonkeyCool::

Thanks PC!  ::MonkeyCool::
YW TM! I ordered a Yellow Tee for Me and Hubby got a Khaki Cap! They are Really KOOL!  ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: texasmom on March 11, 2008, 02:55:31 AM
 

Very Thoughtful Post TM! I Agree!  ::MonkeyWink:: ::MonkeyCool::

Thanks PC!  ::MonkeyCool::
YW TM! I ordered a Yellow Tee for Me and Hubby got a Khaki Cap! They are Really KOOL!  ::MonkeyDance::
I got a white t-shirt, Khaki cap  ::MonkeyHaHa:: , couldn't resist the tote, and added a SCARED MONKEYS MUG to take to work!!!!!  It's all Monkey Cool that's true!   ::MonkeyCool::  Yep, broke now!  ::MonkeyNoNo::  When's payday???? ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: hotping on March 11, 2008, 03:01:36 AM
 

Very Thoughtful Post TM! I Agree!  ::MonkeyWink:: ::MonkeyCool::

Thanks PC!  ::MonkeyCool::
YW TM! I ordered a Yellow Tee for Me and Hubby got a Khaki Cap! They are Really KOOL!  ::MonkeyDance::
I got a white t-shirt, Khaki cap  ::MonkeyHaHa:: , couldn't resist the tote, and added a SCARED MONKEYS MUG to take to work!!!!!  It's all Monkey Cool that's true!   ::MonkeyCool::  Yep, broke now!  ::MonkeyNoNo::  When's payday???? ::MonkeyHaHa::

LOL! I've Got the Mug! My DIL is in Vegas on a Business trip and I will order Her one when she gets back...but only if She returns Dave's Book First...LOL!  ::MonkeyTongue:: ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: texasmom on March 11, 2008, 03:08:55 AM
PC,  That will motivate her to return it, I bet! ::MonkeyWink::  ::MonkeyDance::


I'm calling it a night,

Goodnight everyone!

 ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: hotping on March 11, 2008, 03:10:46 AM
Good Night All!  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: hotping on March 11, 2008, 03:12:52 AM
Good Night TM!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Jo-An on March 11, 2008, 04:22:53 AM
Dutch Bloggers:

Just curious but why do people at FOK call RU the the blog in Ann Arbor Michigan? I have seen 3 times posters at FOK call it that...

In which topic? I searched a couple of topics but can't find it...
I'll have a look at it then.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on March 11, 2008, 04:32:51 AM
I must with Dave that the Sloot residence played an important role.  What's the consensus here...

To what extent was the VDS residence used in NH's dissapearance?
Hi Ocean,good to see you all made it back home safe.

Considering that the van der sloots decided it was a GOOD thing to give their wayward,sicko,out of control son a line of credit at the casinos and carlos&Charlies bar,and his own little private party pad at the age of 15.....I'd say joran used his little apartment for sex parties,and that he took Natalee there(like he took all of his girls there,with his parents approval),Natalee was raped and over drugged and died there.Then they possibly moved her around the dirty little island a couple of times then out to sea.

Karma ... the following segment was taken from the New York lawsuit brought again Paulus and Joran van der Sloot by Beth Twitty and Dave Holloway. 

Janet

++++++++++++

HELEN LEJUEZ - ARUBAN FAMILY ATTORNEY

Affidavid of C. Helen Lejuez

<snipped>

5. ... Miss Doe told me that she was coming forward at that time because she had had an experience that might be similar to Natalee's experience.

6. Miss Doe informed me that, one evening during early in 2005, she met Joran van der Sloot at Carlos'n Charlie's nightclub in Aruba.

7. Miss Doe told me that, over the course of the night, Joran van der Sloot gave her several alcoholic beverages. Miss Doe further stated that she believes that Joran van der Sloot placed some kind of narcotic substance in one of her drinks. The reason she believes she was drugged is that her level of intoxication was greatly disportionate to the amount of alcohol that she consumed.

8. Later that night, according to Miss Doe, Joran Van der Sloot brought Miss Doe back to his apartment, adjacent to his parent's house.

9. Miss Doe then told me that she was sexually assaulted by Joran van der Sloot as she faded in and out of conciousness, At no time did Miss Doe consent to any sexual contact with Joran van der Sloot.

10. Miss Doe advised me that, shortly after she was sexually assaulted by Joran van der Sloot, she learned that two other young women, ages 16 and 17, suffered attacks by Joran van der Sloot under similar circumstances.  
11. Miss Doe told me that, in the aftermath of Joran van der Sloot's attack on Miss Doe, she was threatened and intimidated by Joran van der Sloot, his friends and others. She had been terrified to come forward and tell her story in Aruba.


Jossy Mansur
'Scarborough Country'
August 26, 2005


DANIELS:  It definitely smells that way.  You know, if you take the prosecution‘s statement at its face, we are talking on a whole new level, the charges here.  We are talking about drugs.  We are talking about rape and we are talking about rape of many different people.  There are four guys now in custody, four best friends.  What does that tell you?
 
MANSUR:  Well, what it tells me is that, really, these four guys are friends.  They belong to the same group, these party boys that go out and prey on young, unsuspected girls or other kinds of girls also that are out to have a good time, not suspecting what they‘re in for with these predators around.

And they are—they not only appear in photographs together, but I understand that Freddy lives very near to the Joran house.  So, there is a bond between them.  There is a group that they call themselves the pimps, in which all of these participate.
Thank you Janet.
The pimps of aruba live on it seems,I wonder if they were taught this game by their Daddy's.

I said this the other night (i am like Klaas "Nobody ever listens to me") but I believe this could have been an initiation into the pimps for the younger boys as this group would be moving on (except Satish who stil hasn't graduated from high school). 
I agree Blue Moon
I think Sander was initiated early and(IMO)Val was too.I've seen a few images with Val along side of the older pimps.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Observer on March 11, 2008, 04:33:22 AM
Dutch Bloggers:

Just curious but why do people at FOK call RU the the blog in Ann Arbor Michigan? I have seen 3 times posters at FOK call it that...

In which topic? I searched a couple of topics but can't find it...
I'll have a look at it then.
MadMaster
Live from Amsterdam
maandag 10 maart 2008 @ 19:58

Ik heb af en toe de blog van NWO gevolgd en ik vond de meningen daar redelijk genuanceerd, tot voor kort.
Tsja, iemand dook daar op en acteerde als een olifant in een porseleinkast, dat gaat natuurlijk ook niet goed...

Ik heb vandaag diverse posts daar gelezen die ik van hier herken en waarvan ik zeg:
Het gevolg is nu, indirekt maar toch, dat de boel daar dicht gaat en er naar hier wordt verwezen voor het vervolg.

Eén citaat van de moderator daar:

http://forum.fok.nl/topic/1133186/8/25


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Jo-An on March 11, 2008, 04:40:18 AM
Dutch Bloggers:

Just curious but why do people at FOK call RU the the blog in Ann Arbor Michigan? I have seen 3 times posters at FOK call it that...

In which topic? I searched a couple of topics but can't find it...
I'll have a look at it then.
MadMaster
Live from Amsterdam
maandag 10 maart 2008 @ 19:58

Ik heb af en toe de blog van NWO gevolgd en ik vond de meningen daar redelijk genuanceerd, tot voor kort.
Tsja, iemand dook daar op en acteerde als een olifant in een porseleinkast, dat gaat natuurlijk ook niet goed...

Ik heb vandaag diverse posts daar gelezen die ik van hier herken en waarvan ik zeg:
Het gevolg is nu, indirekt maar toch, dat de boel daar dicht gaat en er naar hier wordt verwezen voor het vervolg.

Eén citaat van de moderator daar:

http://forum.fok.nl/topic/1133186/8/25

I'm afraid I don't understand...  ::MonkeyConfused::
I can't see anything about "Ann Arbor Michigan" in there.
They talk about Dutch blog NWO which is this one: http://www.nwo-info.nl/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: katrien on March 11, 2008, 05:05:21 AM
Something just isn't right about Patrick and this book,I feel like he isn't 100% honest about Joran and these 10 confessions..I sure hope this isn't some type of scam so Joran can buy that house in spain :(

All the tapes were given to Peter R. As far I understood the book is about how Patrick came in touch with Joran and all this.
There is no reason to doubt Patrick. He has a criminal past but went to prison for it. This is a long time ago.

Let him have his book. It is thanks to him that Joran made his confessions and Peter could broadcast it.






Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: mojo on March 11, 2008, 05:07:59 AM
Why is this avatar showing it's azz?

jack, why are you blue?  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: GBMW on March 11, 2008, 05:22:21 AM
Something just isn't right about Patrick and this book,I feel like he isn't 100% honest about Joran and these 10 confessions..I sure hope this isn't some type of scam so Joran can buy that house in spain :(

All the tapes were given to Peter R. As far I understood the book is about how Patrick came in touch with Joran and all this.
There is no reason to doubt Patrick. He has a criminal past but went to prison for it. This is a long time ago.

Let him have his book. It is thanks to him that Joran made his confessions and Peter could broadcast it.

The book of Patrick van der Eem will be released in the Netherlands at the end of June & in the US it will be released in September.

I also don't doubt Patrick. The person he is helped him to get close to Joran and to get his confession. He does have a criminal past but has paid a price for it & seems to have learned from it (which is even more important I think).
And as far as the interview with Poentje goes; I think his quotes were taken out of context. Patrick is crucial for credibility in the confession. And if something was really up Peter R. de Vries would have been in every talkshow talking about it / defending him / would have written a column  etc. And he just gave a couple of quotes and that's it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: San on March 11, 2008, 05:58:14 AM
Something just isn't right about Patrick and this book,I feel like he isn't 100% honest about Joran and these 10 confessions..I sure hope this isn't some type of scam so Joran can buy that house in spain :(

All the tapes were given to Peter R. As far I understood the book is about how Patrick came in touch with Joran and all this.
There is no reason to doubt Patrick. He has a criminal past but went to prison for it. This is a long time ago.

Let him have his book. It is thanks to him that Joran made his confessions and Peter could broadcast it.

The book of Patrick van der Eem will be released in the Netherlands at the end of June & in the US it will be released in September.

I also don't doubt Patrick. The person he is helped him to get close to Joran and to get his confession. He does have a criminal past but has paid a price for it & seems to have learned from it (which is even more important I think).
And as far as the interview with Poentje goes; I think his quotes were taken out of context. Patrick is crucial for credibility in the confession. And if something was really up Peter R. de Vries would have been in every talkshow talking about it / defending him / would have written a column  etc. And he just gave a couple of quotes and that's it.

GBMW I believe it was you who asked for the link to the Enquire article the other day.  If you look below you will see the link where little paperclip is in my post.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Observer on March 11, 2008, 06:11:01 AM
Dutch Bloggers:

Just curious but why do people at FOK call RU the the blog in Ann Arbor Michigan? I have seen 3 times posters at FOK call it that...

In which topic? I searched a couple of topics but can't find it...
I'll have a look at it then.
MadMaster
Live from Amsterdam
maandag 10 maart 2008 @ 19:58

Ik heb af en toe de blog van NWO gevolgd en ik vond de meningen daar redelijk genuanceerd, tot voor kort.
Tsja, iemand dook daar op en acteerde als een olifant in een porseleinkast, dat gaat natuurlijk ook niet goed...

Ik heb vandaag diverse posts daar gelezen die ik van hier herken en waarvan ik zeg:
Het gevolg is nu, indirekt maar toch, dat de boel daar dicht gaat en er naar hier wordt verwezen voor het vervolg.

Eén citaat van de moderator daar:

http://forum.fok.nl/topic/1133186/8/25

I'm afraid I don't understand...  ::MonkeyConfused::
I can't see anything about "Ann Arbor Michigan" in there.
They talk about Dutch blog NWO which is this one: http://www.nwo-info.nl/

Haha Ok the translator was way off on that one.. I knew something was weird.. ::MonkeyHaHa::

Ik heb af en toe de blog van NWO gevolgd en ik vond de meningen daar redelijk genuanceerd, tot voor kort.

(Google Translator)   
I have occasionally followed the blog in Ann Arbor, Michigan, and I found it fairly nuanced opinions, until recently.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: mojo on March 11, 2008, 06:40:26 AM
i agree katrien and GMBW -- in the earliest days of this case all the dutch posters were saying peter de vries was the man to find an answer in this case. his first show came out and it was clear his thinking was along the lines of many of us, but no one seemed to be happy. the anti-holloway contingent poo poo'ed what he said and the anti-aruban contingent didn't think he went far enough.

with his latest show many have also been negative saying he said he'd solve the case. that's not what i read. he was very careful with his wording. he said he would solve the MYSTERY. i feel that he and patrick have done that. joran may have lied at some point in the confessions but i believe that he did not in the earlier ones and in fact, the MYSTERY was solved. the case is another matter. de vries himself has been very careful with what he has said and specificially the most recent statements that he had ideas about paulus' involvement but would not comment because he had no proof.  i think devries is still on the case and working albeit independently to support the aruba police bring this case to trial. he and patrick and the team did a great job, surely they got a scoop, but part of the reason it was a scoop was because it was so well executed and they were able to keep a lid on it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: GBMW on March 11, 2008, 06:48:02 AM
Something just isn't right about Patrick and this book,I feel like he isn't 100% honest about Joran and these 10 confessions..I sure hope this isn't some type of scam so Joran can buy that house in spain :(

All the tapes were given to Peter R. As far I understood the book is about how Patrick came in touch with Joran and all this.
There is no reason to doubt Patrick. He has a criminal past but went to prison for it. This is a long time ago.

Let him have his book. It is thanks to him that Joran made his confessions and Peter could broadcast it.

The book of Patrick van der Eem will be released in the Netherlands at the end of June & in the US it will be released in September.

I also don't doubt Patrick. The person he is helped him to get close to Joran and to get his confession. He does have a criminal past but has paid a price for it & seems to have learned from it (which is even more important I think).
And as far as the interview with Poentje goes; I think his quotes were taken out of context. Patrick is crucial for credibility in the confession. And if something was really up Peter R. de Vries would have been in every talkshow talking about it / defending him / would have written a column  etc. And he just gave a couple of quotes and that's it.

GBMW I believe it was you who asked for the link to the Enquire article the other day.  If you look below you will see the link where little paperclip is in my post.

Thanks! I thought I saw your earlier post with the article yesterday but then I got some problems with my computer....so I wanted to check it today; thanks for being so helpfull!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Tater on March 11, 2008, 07:15:57 AM
Hi Monkey's,
  Just got caught up reading.Watched the video link and listened to Dave and Beth.Seem's Dave thinks it all went down at the Sloots house..Bless his heart and Beth's heart too..One thing I've always wondered about and that is why Dave had to find out from his son that Natalee was missing.I wonder why Beth or Jug didn't call him immediatly..I don't know,just sad...
And you are trying to do what with your question.  Read the books.  Good try.  Not working.     Jack blue


You're way out of line jackb..It was a fair question and it's one that's asked by many people that don't care to go out and buy books to get the answer.This question was answered very nicely which you would have seen had you of scrolled down to see.Do not ever and I mean ever accuse me of anything,especially the act of manipulation.That is an evil accusation and I do not appreciate it one bit.When your pointing your finger at someone else,you've got three pointing right back at you.You might want to remember that!Like I said,it was a fair question and a fair answer followed..God Bless


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 11, 2008, 08:27:33 AM
i agree katrien and GMBW -- in the earliest days of this case all the dutch posters were saying peter de vries was the man to find an answer in this case. his first show came out and it was clear his thinking was along the lines of many of us, but no one seemed to be happy. the anti-holloway contingent poo poo'ed what he said and the anti-aruban contingent didn't think he went far enough.

with his latest show many have also been negative saying he said he'd solve the case. that's not what i read. he was very careful with his wording. he said he would solve the MYSTERY. i feel that he and patrick have done that. joran may have lied at some point in the confessions but i believe that he did not in the earlier ones and in fact, the MYSTERY was solved. the case is another matter. de vries himself has been very careful with what he has said and specificially the most recent statements that he had ideas about paulus' involvement but would not comment because he had no proof.  i think devries is still on the case and working albeit independently to support the aruba police bring this case to trial. he and patrick and the team did a great job, surely they got a scoop, but part of the reason it was a scoop was because it was so well executed and they were able to keep a lid on it.


I agree with you all, if it weren't for Peter DeVries the case would have been buried a long time ago. He has done more than all the prosecutors, investigators, police and judges the "system" enlisted in the entire history of the investigation into Natalee's disappearance. I firmly trust him and if he believes in Patrick I will go with that.

Holland needs to question the cover-up, that's where they are going to get the answers. Tha Van der Sloots are buttoned up and will never tell the truth. By unraveling the cover-up the Dutch investigators and prosecutors can go in through the back door to expose them. This is elementary investigative technique, they should realize it it and pursue it vigorously.

I have no faith in Hans Mos. He has ignored the cover-up to date and failed at every task he has performed. I believe he is conducting a low level cover-up of his own with Dop Kruimel in tow. Something about Aruba turns all of the asshole into criminals. Clean investigative, prosecutorial and judicial leadership from Holland is the only way we will get a prosecution in Natalee's case.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Observer on March 11, 2008, 08:43:11 AM
Something just isn't right about Patrick and this book,I feel like he isn't 100% honest about Joran and these 10 confessions..I sure hope this isn't some type of scam so Joran can buy that house in spain :(

All the tapes were given to Peter R. As far I understood the book is about how Patrick came in touch with Joran and all this.
There is no reason to doubt Patrick. He has a criminal past but went to prison for it. This is a long time ago.

Let him have his book. It is thanks to him that Joran made his confessions and Peter could broadcast it.
Patrick and De Vries did something no one else even came close to and I am very grateful for trying to help,I am just a little frustrated right now. I think it's awful what Pontje Castro and others are trying to do him and his past shouldn't be held against him. I see Patrick as a very street smart person and I am just a little stunned he didn't question Joran on some things and is so quick for this book to come out. If he has any contact with Joran right now I think that is somewhat suspicious,I guess I am worried he is playing both sides is all. He did say the below quote..So we will have to wait and see what he says..

"And I will make sure that Joran and his entire family fall flat on their face. They had better emigrate to Africa" the paper quoted Van der Eem as saying


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Tater on March 11, 2008, 08:51:14 AM
i agree katrien and GMBW -- in the earliest days of this case all the dutch posters were saying peter de vries was the man to find an answer in this case. his first show came out and it was clear his thinking was along the lines of many of us, but no one seemed to be happy. the anti-holloway contingent poo poo'ed what he said and the anti-aruban contingent didn't think he went far enough.

with his latest show many have also been negative saying he said he'd solve the case. that's not what i read. he was very careful with his wording. he said he would solve the MYSTERY. i feel that he and patrick have done that. joran may have lied at some point in the confessions but i believe that he did not in the earlier ones and in fact, the MYSTERY was solved. the case is another matter. de vries himself has been very careful with what he has said and specificially the most recent statements that he had ideas about paulus' involvement but would not comment because he had no proof.  i think devries is still on the case and working albeit independently to support the aruba police bring this case to trial. he and patrick and the team did a great job, surely they got a scoop, but part of the reason it was a scoop was because it was so well executed and they were able to keep a lid on it.

What mystery did Peter DeVries solve other than Natalee had a seizure while being with Yoran? Do we have the answers to the rest of the mysteries like why Natalee had a seizure?Was it because of a date rape drug or possibly a blow to the head or maybe both? Did he solve the whereabouts of the murder scene? Was it at the lighthouse,rocks,Sloots,beach,etc...Did he solve the mystery as to all the culprits involved?Does he have a list of names? Personally,I think it's going to take way more than what DeVries or Patrick has to finally get to the bottom of all this. I myself am praying that someone who participated will simply come clean and confess the truth,the whole truth,and nothing but the truth....Does feeling like this make me part of the anti-holloway contingent or the anti-aruban contingent ? I just want to be on the side of truth and that for me is that Natalee Holloway deserves justice and I pray she get's it here in this world because I know for sure she will in the next..One way or another,it's coming and there is no escaping it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: GBMW on March 11, 2008, 08:58:34 AM

[/quote]


I have no faith in Hans Mos. He has ignored the cover-up to date and failed at every task he has performed. I believe he is conducting a low level cover-up of his own with Dop Kruimel in tow. Something about Aruba turns all of the asshole into criminals. Clean investigative, prosecutorial and judicial leadership from Holland is the only way we will get a prosecution in Natalee's case.

[/quote]

Dayhiker, I don't know a lot what Hans Mos has been stating / doing so I can't really give an opinion but from what I've seen and heard of Hans Mos I don't get that impression of him. At least I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt. Especially after I read an article in 'de Volkskrant'.

Hans Mos had a meeting with Peter R. de Vries (when Peter thought he had enough evidence); Peter showed him the confession. Hans Mos suggested to Peter R. de Vries the quotes of Joran weren't good enough for murder because it wasn't clear if Joran knew for certain that Natalee was dead. Peter went back to Holland and did another taping with a lot of questions whether Joran knew for certain if she was dead. He got the quotes Hans Mos needed so Joran is now a suspect of murder.
You can look at this as Hans Mos trying to cover up (OM Aruba knew of the undercover operation before the last taping occured so maybe that could cause trouble in a trial).

But if it was likely to cause a lot of trouble for the case Peter R. de Vries wouldn't have done another taping...the confession was already there and for his televisionshow he didn't need more material. So I'm thinking Hans Mos probably asked Peter R. de Vries to help him...and he did.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on March 11, 2008, 08:59:53 AM
Interesting to look at the islands yearbooks..Such a small class but yet so many with the same last name..Kock,Arendsz,Arends,Maduro..Croes..and yes Wever  ::MonkeyWink::

(http://i198.photobucket.com/albums/aa118/Observer00000007/1983-v21.jpg)

Ah yes, and Roland Peterson sticks out like a sore thumb in the pix. Now there is a familiar name ...wasn't he an Interrogator? He looks kinda 'sneaky' in the photo. Not to be trusted, even then ...imo...lol.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on March 11, 2008, 09:11:14 AM
she was still in love with Joran  ::MonkeyNoNo::

on drugs maybe, otherwise...  ::MonkeyNoNo:: in love with joran....who is she lilly munster? i wish devries would dig around on jacobs and van der stratten.
       

Why is this avatar showing it's azz?


Because she can??  ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: nimrod on March 11, 2008, 09:14:54 AM
i agree katrien and GMBW -- in the earliest days of this case all the dutch posters were saying peter de vries was the man to find an answer in this case. his first show came out and it was clear his thinking was along the lines of many of us, but no one seemed to be happy. the anti-holloway contingent poo poo'ed what he said and the anti-aruban contingent didn't think he went far enough.

with his latest show many have also been negative saying he said he'd solve the case. that's not what i read. he was very careful with his wording. he said he would solve the MYSTERY. i feel that he and patrick have done that. joran may have lied at some point in the confessions but i believe that he did not in the earlier ones and in fact, the MYSTERY was solved. the case is another matter. de vries himself has been very careful with what he has said and specificially the most recent statements that he had ideas about paulus' involvement but would not comment because he had no proof.  i think devries is still on the case and working albeit independently to support the aruba police bring this case to trial. he and patrick and the team did a great job, surely they got a scoop, but part of the reason it was a scoop was because it was so well executed and they were able to keep a lid on it.


I agree with you all, if it weren't for Peter DeVries the case would have been buried a long time ago. He has done more than all the prosecutors, investigators, police and judges the "system" enlisted in the entire history of the investigation into Natalee's disappearance. I firmly trust him and if he believes in Patrick I will go with that.

Holland needs to question the cover-up, that's where they are going to get the answers. Tha Van der Sloots are buttoned up and will never tell the truth. By unraveling the cover-up the Dutch investigators and prosecutors can go in through the back door to expose them. This is elementary investigative technique, they should realize it it and pursue it vigorously.

I have no faith in Hans Mos. He has ignored the cover-up to date and failed at every task he has performed. I believe he is conducting a low level cover-up of his own with Dop Kruimel in tow. Something about Aruba turns all of the asshole into criminals. Clean investigative, prosecutorial and judicial leadership from Holland is the only way we will get a prosecution in Natalee's case.


I agree dayhiker.  I don't know where Hans Mos is coming from, but he has accomplished NOTHING since he arrived on the scene.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: GBMW on March 11, 2008, 09:17:15 AM

Patrick and De Vries did something no one else even came close to and I am very grateful for trying to help,I am just a little frustrated right now. I think it's awful what Pontje Castro and others are trying to do him and his past shouldn't be held against him. I see Patrick as a very street smart person and I am just a little stunned he didn't question Joran on some things and is so quick for this book to come out. If he has any contact with Joran right now I think that is somewhat suspicious,I guess I am worried he is playing both sides is all. He did say the below quote..So we will have to wait and see what he says..

"And I will make sure that Joran and his entire family fall flat on their face. They had better emigrate to Africa" the paper quoted Van der Eem as saying

[/quote]

For the record: Patrick didn't say that quote; it was a very wrong translation / interpretation of something he said during that Poentje interview.....

Patrick might be streetsmart but no journalist or investigator. I think he did the best he could. The book coming out, the media-attention....I'm sure he loves the attention & money coming from this. But he started this thing not knowing if anything at all would come out of it....and in the beginning spending a lot of money trying to impress Joran and gambling away money with Poker (he's not that good at it). Maybe in some way he is playing both sides; it wouldn't surprise me either.

But to be honest; I really could care less him getting all the attention & money he wants as long as the truth comes out in the meantime ;-)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on March 11, 2008, 09:19:28 AM
Something just isn't right about Patrick and this book,I feel like he isn't 100% honest about Joran and these 10 confessions..I sure hope this isn't some type of scam so Joran can buy that house in spain :(


I am up and down with what is going on too...
(http://bestsmileys.com/playing/23.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on March 11, 2008, 09:25:21 AM
Good morning, Spunky Monkeys and Gawking Guests (sorry, couldn't think of the appropriate word this AM--what I mean is get in here and join us, I know you have something important to say, unless you are at work then continue to W&L).

Good morning, All!

 ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Destiny on March 11, 2008, 09:26:42 AM
I must with Dave that the Sloot residence played an important role.  What's the consensus here...

To what extent was the VDS residence used in NH's dissapearance?

The newly poured concrete right at the height of the disappearance is extremely suspect. I cannot imagine ANYONE suspected of murder, kidnapping, rape etc. in the U.S. being allowed to pour new concrete or having new furniture delivered to their home without being investigated and having the concrete dug up or the old furniture inspected and tested.  Guess I believe this is where it all started and it ended up at the beach with disposal in the ocean.

Hello OE...good to see you water Monkey ;-)

A few days back I posted my *gut* Speculations on the Sloot home...I still believe that Natalee was still there, when Beth and Dave arrived at the home....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: mojo on March 11, 2008, 09:43:49 AM
btw, nut...thanks for that!  ;)

i also wonder why mos went to aruba in the first place. he has a good record from what i've read in the dutch press etc.

looking from his perspective at the events of december 2007 -- he took a bold gamble that did not pay off. if anything it backfired and with the  luxury of 20/20 hindsight, if he had know what de vries was up to and held off a few weeks or so, he might have had things fall into place. but i wonder if he's not over there also digging around into who did what, who are the good cops and who are the dirty cops. just an intuition, but he came across as a very straight shooter, perhaps he just had no idea of what he was up against.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on March 11, 2008, 09:45:48 AM
Question:
Why would multiple legal professionals jeopardize their careers, livelihood, and freedom to cover for the VDSs?

-All very close friends?
- PvdS has dirt on them all and willing to use it as leverage?
- Blackmail?
 


ALL OF THE ABOVE and probably a few more. Add The Mafia and its storefront tourism organizations ATA/AHATA in there. Paulus probably has some connections there, his business partner Antonio Carlo, Joran's lawyer, sits on the board of AHATA and they are the ones who attacked Natalee and Beth in the media.

Once you start lying its hard to go back and lose face. This is probably even more true for people in higher positions.
So what other choice ist there but to maintain that the lies are the truth

JE, I agree with you.  I also think that at least some of the ALE did not know exactly what was being covered up.  I think they believe they were covering up a naughty boy who snuck out, hung out with the guys, and then snuck in late.  Once the die was cast, to go back would start to unravel a ball of string that has been accumulating since there was an ALE on this island.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on March 11, 2008, 09:58:50 AM
Something just isn't right about Patrick and this book,I feel like he isn't 100% honest about Joran and these 10 confessions..I sure hope this isn't some type of scam so Joran can buy that house in spain :(

All the tapes were given to Peter R. As far I understood the book is about how Patrick came in touch with Joran and all this.
There is no reason to doubt Patrick. He has a criminal past but went to prison for it. This is a long time ago.

Let him have his book. It is thanks to him that Joran made his confessions and Peter could broadcast it.

The book of Patrick van der Eem will be released in the Netherlands at the end of June & in the US it will be released in September.

I also don't doubt Patrick. The person he is helped him to get close to Joran and to get his confession. He does have a criminal past but has paid a price for it & seems to have learned from it (which is even more important I think).
And as far as the interview with Poentje goes; I think his quotes were taken out of context. Patrick is crucial for credibility in the confession. And if something was really up Peter R. de Vries would have been in every talkshow talking about it / defending him / would have written a column  etc. And he just gave a couple of quotes and that's it.

I agree Katrien and GBMW.  The tapes of Patrick and Joran left no doubt in the average mind of what kind of Joran's persona.  He was exposed for all to see, nothing that occurs after this point will ever place Joran in a positive light again if he continues the way he is (I mean without confessing and doing time). 

Patrick also placed himself in danger doing this.  We know there is at least some negative influence in the justice system there (understated, no?), so what he did places him at risk.

I have not seen anything to make me think otherwise, based on the information available to me to date.  The only thing that is out there to say otherwise. is a man who openly admits a bias against the case and someone who wants to make a big name for himself.

I believe Patrick is a man who loves his family deeply and would not jeopardize that.  He declined drinks to go swimming with them.  IMO, the fear of jailtime or punishment dished out would be nominal compared to missing time with his children, while imprisoned.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: ldstlou on March 11, 2008, 10:21:21 AM
Good Morning Monkeys!!!

I am sending out my thank you notes to those who participated with us on Sunday. I think most of you know I invited some of my scouts out. I wanted you to know why. Here is the thank you note I am sending the boys and why it meant so much to me that they participated:



What brave young men you are to come out as you did on Sunday and take a stand and let your voices be heard, I am so proud of you all. You took a stand for a girl who you know of, but never actually knew, that is even more incredible to me. There are people all across America that have also taken a stand for Natalee, and most of us never knew her personally either. You are now part of a very special group of people who have given their voices to a very important cause; Justice for Natalee.

At the beginning of every Cub Scout meeting, we stand and say the Pledge of Allegiance together. We state:

I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America,
And to the Republic for which it stands:
One Nation under God, indivisible,
With Liberty and Justice for all.

I just want to take a minute and tell you why I am so grateful for what you did Sunday, and why I feel it is so important. I think you understand most of the words of the Pledge of Allegiance, but there are three very important words at the end that we are pledging, that we are making a commitment to, and they are; Indivisible, Liberty, and Justice. So I looked those words up in the dictionary and here is what I found:

Indivisible: incapable of being divided.

Liberty: the power of choice. The right to live one’s life without threats, fear, or some kind of retaliation.

Justice: the right to be treated justly, fairly, and according to proper laws and principle.

Our Pledge of Allegiance ends with; for All. These principles we pledge to belong to EVERY AMERICAN regardless of race, religion, color, creed or any other criteria. So my understand is that essentially, we are saying that as Americans, we stand together and can not be divided, and that we are committed to Liberty, to live our lives without fear or threats, but if our Liberty is taken away, then we also are committed to Justice. That those who took away our Liberties must be held responsible according to the Law. If you break the law, then you must be held responsible for your actions.

Unfortunately, Aruba has not given Natalee Justice. Natalee's Liberties were taken away from her when she visited Aruba, and now as Americans, we are standing up to say, Natalee deserves Justice. The bad guys need to go to court and if found guilty, then they should be put in jail. This is what you stood up and said on Sunday when you were passing out the fliers. You were true to your Pledge of Allegiance, and for this, I am so very proud of you. You may be young men, but your voices are strong and you made a difference on Sunday and stood up for our beliefs, as Americans, and as Cub Scouts who Pledge Allegiance to our Flag.

Thank you so much my brave heroes!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: MumInOhio on March 11, 2008, 10:21:47 AM
Interesting to look at the islands yearbooks..Such a small class but yet so many with the same last name..Kock,Arendsz,Arends,Maduro..Croes..and yes Wever  ::MonkeyWink::
That is interesting.Lot of them look unhappy,mainly the girls.Wonder if we can find one with Lorenzo in it?
I stumbled onto a couple of years at that school but well before Lorenzo's time  ::MonkeyWink:: No one real important in the yearbooks except Robert Wever,you may see a couple of ministers..But no one tied into this case that I know of.

http://www.colegiopariba.freeservers.com/index.html
Thank you *******.
While it's slow around here I'm going to see if I can find out more info on Lorenzo.Also,does anyone know what Freddy's parents names are?What they do on aruba?

Karma…this is some of what I have found…keep coming to dead ends…anything you can find would be appreciated…

FREDDY ZEDAN ARAMBATZIS/ARENDS…VENEZUELAN…Around 24 now and according to Joran only speaks Pap.

Father…Melody posted that he was on his death bed in Venezuela, with a smile! JE did find a 52 year old male in Venezuela…named Arambatzis.

Caps found…Zedan=0….Arambatzis=2…need to check back with him on that!

Mother.. ARAMBATZIS-RODRIGUEZ ALBERT   LILIAN REGINA
62 MONTANJA  NOORD  from Chamber records
Also have 39 F or G…not sure which right now. Also read that she was Dutch.

Kermit has an address of 7A Catiri….I followed this to a Frederick Arends on the Chamber list.

Here’s some posts I found...

Freddy's mom is a "Supervisory Director" for the Bubali Sports Club located in Noord. Bubali is also the location of the Bird Sanctuary which has 2 ponds.Here is the complete name of Freddy's mom: Freddy's mom is a "Supervisory Director" for the Bubali Sports Club located in Noord. Bubali is also the location of the Bird Sanctuary which has 2 ponds.Here is the complete name of Freddy's mom:
LILIAN REGINA ARAMBATZIS-RODRIGUEZ ALBERTIt appears that she has been married twice. I don't know if Rodriguez or Albert is her maiden name. Since she is listed as being "Dutch" I would think that "Albert" was probably her maiden name....but, I am not sure. Can anybody help me out on this? I have always thought "Zedan" was Freddy's last name until I found this other info. Could it be his middle name? You can find this information at: http://206.48.100.138/registry/registry_search.afpType in: S.C. BUBALI where it says TRADE NAME & then click search.
Posted by: Shelly | Monday, August 29, 2005
++++
 Do you remember Freddy Zedan and the house on Montana Street? His family’s name was Arambatzis-Rodriguez. There were several half- and/or step-siblings, all with different surnames.

I’m wondering if Daury could be one of them - perhaps innocent of this accusation, but related to the real person who did it.

In your post # 2,315 on previous thread, the link to picture of Freddy Zedan, code named "badboy_956", picture dated 7-13-04, shows the same guy "Freddy" as in the pictures posted earlier today.
 
He is flashing that awful gang sign, this time with both hands. There is a middle-aged woman in the background, who can't see the gang signs, and probably wouldn't know what they mean, anyway
++++
Brother … from Sharon, vms and Kermit...Ernesto Arambatzis…Miami Fl from around 1999…seems to disappeared of off the radar other than court documents from late 2007 and 2007. Graduated college in Venezuela…found that on line.

Is related to Sasha Rodriguez, maybe a half or stepsister. A couple of other Rodriguez pop up on the Dr Phil documents…not sure if they are related. Post above mentions different names.

Seems some what protected as he was let out the back door very quietly on his release and reportedly, per Harry Tho, left the country immediately.

According to a taped recording of the Kalpoes on 6/22/2005, he is the reason they were arrested!




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Destiny on March 11, 2008, 10:53:22 AM
Good Morning Monkeys!!!

I am sending out my thank you notes to those who participated with us on Sunday. I think most of you know I invited some of my scouts out. I wanted you to know why. Here is the thank you note I am sending the boys and why it meant so much to me that they participated:



What brave young men you are to come out as you did on Sunday and take a stand and let your voices be heard, I am so proud of you all. You took a stand for a girl who you know of, but never actually knew, that is even more incredible to me. There are people all across America that have also taken a stand for Natalee, and most of us never knew her personally either. You are now part of a very special group of people who have given their voices to a very important cause; Justice for Natalee.

At the beginning of every Cub Scout meeting, we stand and say the Pledge of Allegiance together. We state:

I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America,
And to the Republic for which it stands:
One Nation under God, indivisible,
With Liberty and Justice for all.

I just want to take a minute and tell you why I am so grateful for what you did Sunday, and why I feel it is so important. I think you understand most of the words of the Pledge of Allegiance, but there are three very important words at the end that we are pledging, that we are making a commitment to, and they are; Indivisible, Liberty, and Justice. So I looked those words up in the dictionary and here is what I found:

Indivisible: incapable of being divided.

Liberty: the power of choice. The right to live one’s life without threats, fear, or some kind of retaliation.

Justice: the right to be treated justly, fairly, and according to proper laws and principle.

Our Pledge of Allegiance ends with; for All. These principles we pledge to belong to EVERY AMERICAN regardless of race, religion, color, creed or any other criteria. So my understand is that essentially, we are saying that as Americans, we stand together and can not be divided, and that we are committed to Liberty, to live our lives without fear or threats, but if our Liberty is taken away, then we also are committed to Justice. That those who took away our Liberties must be held responsible according to the Law. If you break the law, then you must be held responsible for your actions.

Unfortunately, Aruba has not given Natalee Justice. Natalee's Liberties were taken away from her when she visited Aruba, and now as Americans, we are standing up to say, Natalee deserves Justice. The bad guys need to go to court and if found guilty, then they should be put in jail. This is what you stood up and said on Sunday when you were passing out the fliers. You were true to your Pledge of Allegiance, and for this, I am so very proud of you. You may be young men, but your voices are strong and you made a difference on Sunday and stood up for our beliefs, as Americans, and as Cub Scouts who Pledge Allegiance to our Flag.

Thank you so much my brave heroes!!!


Incredible Letter!!!

I'm sure that these Young Men...the Scouts, will have this day forever inscribed in their minds.  What a beautiful real life lesson for them in the true meaning of FREEDOM.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on March 11, 2008, 10:55:41 AM
Wow!  I had to do a double take:

The Dana Pretzer Show On Scared Monkeys Radio - Listen Live TONIGHT At A Special Time, 8PM Eastern, 7PM Central, 5PM Pacific - Guests Include Drew Peterson, Joel Brodsky, Vanessa Leggett, Robin Sax, Pat Brown and Scared Monkey “Lisa”

Go Dana!

Go Lisa!

 ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: ldstlou on March 11, 2008, 10:56:39 AM
Good Morning Monkeys!!!

I am sending out my thank you notes to those who participated with us on Sunday. I think most of you know I invited some of my scouts out. I wanted you to know why. Here is the thank you note I am sending the boys and why it meant so much to me that they participated:



What brave young men you are to come out as you did on Sunday and take a stand and let your voices be heard, I am so proud of you all. You took a stand for a girl who you know of, but never actually knew, that is even more incredible to me. There are people all across America that have also taken a stand for Natalee, and most of us never knew her personally either. You are now part of a very special group of people who have given their voices to a very important cause; Justice for Natalee.

At the beginning of every Cub Scout meeting, we stand and say the Pledge of Allegiance together. We state:

I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America,
And to the Republic for which it stands:
One Nation under God, indivisible,
With Liberty and Justice for all.

I just want to take a minute and tell you why I am so grateful for what you did Sunday, and why I feel it is so important. I think you understand most of the words of the Pledge of Allegiance, but there are three very important words at the end that we are pledging, that we are making a commitment to, and they are; Indivisible, Liberty, and Justice. So I looked those words up in the dictionary and here is what I found:

Indivisible: incapable of being divided.

Liberty: the power of choice. The right to live one’s life without threats, fear, or some kind of retaliation.

Justice: the right to be treated justly, fairly, and according to proper laws and principle.

Our Pledge of Allegiance ends with; for All. These principles we pledge to belong to EVERY AMERICAN regardless of race, religion, color, creed or any other criteria. So my understand is that essentially, we are saying that as Americans, we stand together and can not be divided, and that we are committed to Liberty, to live our lives without fear or threats, but if our Liberty is taken away, then we also are committed to Justice. That those who took away our Liberties must be held responsible according to the Law. If you break the law, then you must be held responsible for your actions.

Unfortunately, Aruba has not given Natalee Justice. Natalee's Liberties were taken away from her when she visited Aruba, and now as Americans, we are standing up to say, Natalee deserves Justice. The bad guys need to go to court and if found guilty, then they should be put in jail. This is what you stood up and said on Sunday when you were passing out the fliers. You were true to your Pledge of Allegiance, and for this, I am so very proud of you. You may be young men, but your voices are strong and you made a difference on Sunday and stood up for our beliefs, as Americans, and as Cub Scouts who Pledge Allegiance to our Flag.

Thank you so much my brave heroes!!!


Incredible Letter!!!

I'm sure that these Young Men...the Scouts, will have this day forever inscribed in their minds.  What a beautiful real life lesson for them in the true meaning of FREEDOM.

Thank you. I thought it was a great lesson for them also. You just know these little guys who stood out all day for Natalee are going to be great leaders one day!! They made me so darned proud!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: ldstlou on March 11, 2008, 10:58:00 AM
Wow!  I had to do a double take:

The Dana Pretzer Show On Scared Monkeys Radio - Listen Live TONIGHT At A Special Time, 8PM Eastern, 7PM Central, 5PM Pacific - Guests Include Drew Peterson, Joel Brodsky, Vanessa Leggett, Robin Sax, Pat Brown and Scared Monkey “Lisa”

Go Dana!

Go Lisa!

 ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


oh crap!!! I just did a double take too!!! lol
Don't laugh at my voice you guys!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on March 11, 2008, 11:16:30 AM
Wow!  I had to do a double take:

The Dana Pretzer Show On Scared Monkeys Radio - Listen Live TONIGHT At A Special Time, 8PM Eastern, 7PM Central, 5PM Pacific - Guests Include Drew Peterson, Joel Brodsky, Vanessa Leggett, Robin Sax, Pat Brown and Scared Monkey “Lisa”

Go Dana!

Go Lisa!

 ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


oh crap!!! I just did a double take too!!! lol
Don't laugh at my voice you guys!!!

Monkey voices are nothing to laugh at!  The only bad voice is a silent one in the face of injustice.
Go Lisa!  Go Lisa!  Go Lisa!  Go Lisa!  She's a Monkey!  Go Lisa!

There's a monkey in the house!!!!

 ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: snoopy on March 11, 2008, 11:31:22 AM


Way to go Lisa!!  And don't let her kid you guys.  She is an amazing young woman.  Smart funny pretty, and I was told by several gentleman at the wedding reception that she was "hot" lol  And coming from an ole lady myself she is "hot" lol. lol.  I'll tell ya sumpin else....she's a great momma!!  Her son is so sweet.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: ldstlou on March 11, 2008, 12:00:19 PM


Way to go Lisa!!  And don't let her kid you guys.  She is an amazing young woman.  Smart funny pretty, and I was told by several gentleman at the wedding reception that she was "hot" lol  And coming from an ole lady myself she is "hot" lol. lol.  I'll tell ya sumpin else....she's a great momma!!  Her son is so sweet.

I luv ya snoopy!!! BUT CUT IT OUT!!! lol you are embarrassing me!!!!
I do have a great son though!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: BUCKSHOT on March 11, 2008, 12:06:27 PM
It makes perfect sense that Joran had a small party back at his home.

Stopping in front of his home, per PV's, was in case someone saw them there.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Peaches on March 11, 2008, 12:09:14 PM


Way to go Lisa!!  And don't let her kid you guys.  She is an amazing young woman.  Smart funny pretty, and I was told by several gentleman at the wedding reception that she was "hot" lol  And coming from an ole lady myself she is "hot" lol. lol.  I'll tell ya sumpin else....she's a great momma!!  Her son is so sweet.

I luv ya snoopy!!! BUT CUT IT OUT!!! lol you are embarrassing me!!!!
I do have a great son though!!!

Thank you for doing an outstanding job at the St. Louis Show.  Great job everyone. 



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: ldstlou on March 11, 2008, 12:10:14 PM



I have no faith in Hans Mos. He has ignored the cover-up to date and failed at every task he has performed. I believe he is conducting a low level cover-up of his own with Dop Kruimel in tow. Something about Aruba turns all of the asshole into criminals. Clean investigative, prosecutorial and judicial leadership from Holland is the only way we will get a prosecution in Natalee's case.

[/quote]

Dayhiker, I don't know a lot what Hans Mos has been stating / doing so I can't really give an opinion but from what I've seen and heard of Hans Mos I don't get that impression of him. At least I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt. Especially after I read an article in 'de Volkskrant'.

Hans Mos had a meeting with Peter R. de Vries (when Peter thought he had enough evidence); Peter showed him the confession. Hans Mos suggested to Peter R. de Vries the quotes of Joran weren't good enough for murder because it wasn't clear if Joran knew for certain that Natalee was dead. Peter went back to Holland and did another taping with a lot of questions whether Joran knew for certain if she was dead. He got the quotes Hans Mos needed so Joran is now a suspect of murder.
You can look at this as Hans Mos trying to cover up (OM Aruba knew of the undercover operation before the last taping occured so maybe that could cause trouble in a trial).

But if it was likely to cause a lot of trouble for the case Peter R. de Vries wouldn't have done another taping...the confession was already there and for his televisionshow he didn't need more material. So I'm thinking Hans Mos probably asked Peter R. de Vries to help him...and he did.

[/quote]

I have to agree with dayhiker. I think he started with good intentions but allowed himself to become just another puppet of Aruba's.
What he did to Beth and Dave in inexcuseable. To call them over Thanksgiving and lure them to Aruba with "new evidence" and once again "false hopes" only to sit and interogate them for hours about Natalee's "habits", now how is that representing Justice?
And what did John Q. Kelly say after, there is no new evidence. He is playing the same game now as the rest of them imho. He has been bought and payed for.
And lets face it, for Aruba to prosecute now, they would also have to admit to the cover up by the police and officials from day 1...I don't think they will le that happen.
My hope lies in Beth and a civil case. Sending my prayers to her!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: ldstlou on March 11, 2008, 12:11:49 PM


Way to go Lisa!!  And don't let her kid you guys.  She is an amazing young woman.  Smart funny pretty, and I was told by several gentleman at the wedding reception that she was "hot" lol  And coming from an ole lady myself she is "hot" lol. lol.  I'll tell ya sumpin else....she's a great momma!!  Her son is so sweet.

I luv ya snoopy!!! BUT CUT IT OUT!!! lol you are embarrassing me!!!!
I do have a great son though!!!

Thank you for doing an outstanding job at the St. Louis Show.  Great job everyone. 



Thank you Peaches. hope you are feeling well!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: jackb on March 11, 2008, 12:14:04 PM
Think I'm going to go play some games then watch the news.

GOODNIGHT ALL!

do you play backgammon?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: jackb on March 11, 2008, 12:23:56 PM
Why is this avatar showing it's azz?

jack, why are you blue?  ::MonkeyCool::

because I am stone cold and try to avoid plummer's cracks as they have no real value except to disconbobulate.    lol


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: jackb on March 11, 2008, 12:27:43 PM
My apologies for messing up the quotes JackB  ::MonkeyConfused:: I do that sometimes.


No thing shell. Keep on shelling.  lol  jackb


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: jackb on March 11, 2008, 12:30:56 PM
Hi Monkey's,
  Just got caught up reading.Watched the video link and listened to Dave and Beth.Seem's Dave thinks it all went down at the Sloots house..Bless his heart and Beth's heart too..One thing I've always wondered about and that is why Dave had to find out from his son that Natalee was missing.I wonder why Beth or Jug didn't call him immediatly..I don't know,just sad...
And you are trying to do what with your question.  Read the books.  Good try.  Not working.     Jack blue

or you will?.....If the shoe fits.....also there are other questions that does not involve family business I am sure. 


You're way out of line jackb..It was a fair question and it's one that's asked by many people that don't care to go out and buy books to get the answer.This question was answered very nicely which you would have seen had you of scrolled down to see.Do not ever and I mean ever accuse me of anything,especially the act of manipulation.That is an evil accusation and I do not appreciate it one bit.When your pointing your finger at someone else,you've got three pointing right back at you.You might want to remember that!Like I said,it was a fair question and a fair answer followed..God Bless


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: jackb on March 11, 2008, 12:38:12 PM
Hi Monkey's,
  Just got caught up reading.Watched the video link and listened to Dave and Beth.Seem's Dave thinks it all went down at the Sloots house..Bless his heart and Beth's heart too..One thing I've always wondered about and that is why Dave had to find out from his son that Natalee was missing.I wonder why Beth or Jug didn't call him immediatly..I don't know,just sad...
And you are trying to do what with your question.  Read the books.  Good try.  Not working.     Jack blue



You're way out of line jackb..It was a fair question and it's one that's asked by many people that don't care to go out and buy books to get the answer.This question was answered very nicely which you would have seen had you of scrolled down to see.Do not ever and I mean ever accuse me of anything,especially the act of manipulation.That is an evil accusation and I do not appreciate it one bit.When your pointing your finger at someone else,you've got three pointing right back at you.You might want to remember that!Like I said,it was a fair question and a fair answer followed..God Bless
  If the shoe fits....er bless your heart.  Also there are many questions that does no involve family business that needs to be answered.  jack b



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: crazybabyborg on March 11, 2008, 12:49:22 PM
Hi Guys! My internet's back and I just couldn't resist saying hello! I'll be lurking a while, because I'm WAY behind, but I hope it's ok if I mention this: Please check the Lounge (link in my signature line) for your Easter avatar, and leave a post if you aren't in the list. I'll get to you asap!  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Destiny on March 11, 2008, 12:56:10 PM
Hi Guys! My internet's back and I just couldn't resist saying hello! I'll be lurking a while, because I'm WAY behind, but I hope it's ok if I mention this: Please check the Lounge (link in my signature line) for your Easter avatar, and leave a post if you aren't in the list. I'll get to you asap!  ::MonkeyWink::

CBB...Missed Ya!!!!  Love my Easter AVI...YOU ROCK!!!  ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: SunnyinTX on March 11, 2008, 12:56:14 PM
Hi Guys! My internet's back and I just couldn't resist saying hello! I'll be lurking a while, because I'm WAY behind, but I hope it's ok if I mention this: Please check the Lounge (link in my signature line) for your Easter avatar, and leave a post if you aren't in the list. I'll get to you asap!  ::MonkeyWink::
CBB So glad you are back...you were missed!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: hotping on March 11, 2008, 01:28:42 PM
Welcome Back CBB You Were Missed Very Much! I Have Been Over and Found My Easter Avitar and Its Perfect but I will wait until after St Patty's Day to change. Thank You!  ::MonkeyDance::  ::MonkeyCool:: 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 11, 2008, 01:33:10 PM
Hi Guys! My internet's back and I just couldn't resist saying hello! I'll be lurking a while, because I'm WAY behind, but I hope it's ok if I mention this: Please check the Lounge (link in my signature line) for your Easter avatar, and leave a post if you aren't in the list. I'll get to you asap!  ::MonkeyWink::

Hi cbb.  Welcome back ... you were missed.

Hey ... I may be without internet without a moment's notice.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Yesterday hubby informed our daughter that he was tempted to sabotage my computer.  He did laugh after making the comment but ... this wannabe detective speculates that she had better adhere to the underlying message and ... spend more time outside the computer room.

cbb ... Ducky and I would appreciate if ... at your convenience ... the red Valentine flower could be replaced with a small Easter Lily.

Thank you.

Janet



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: katrien on March 11, 2008, 01:36:48 PM
Look who's that:

http://www.rtl.nl/shows/jensen/home/index.xml




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: mojo on March 11, 2008, 01:40:05 PM
Look who's that:

http://www.rtl.nl/shows/jensen/home/index.xml




katrien, i am guessing you're pointing out that bram moskowicz is on jensen.... ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Flipper/Donnie29 on March 11, 2008, 01:50:47 PM
Look who's that:

http://www.rtl.nl/shows/jensen/home/index.xml




Hi Katrien.. when is Bram coming on then?? I guess thursday.. tonight 2 farmers:P wednesday.. dr alban and then thursday Bram??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: katrien on March 11, 2008, 01:58:40 PM
Look who's that:

http://www.rtl.nl/shows/jensen/home/index.xml




Hi Katrien.. when is Bram coming on then?? I guess thursday.. tonight 2 farmers:P wednesday.. dr alban and then thursday Bram??

It seems to be this week, most likely not tonight. The show is also broadcasted on Fridaynight.

 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Jerry from Ohio on March 11, 2008, 02:10:35 PM
 To IDSTLOU:
   Dear sweet Lady you are such a wonderful woman as well as a teacher of the young and as a leader in the Scouting program you have shown these young men that a community that is served by upstanding young men will continue to thrive and prosper , I am not just speaking of financial wealth but wealth in regards in our youth that will grow and be able to stand up responsibly for good verses evil .
  A very heartfelt thank you to you IDSTLOU and may I say again that I am proud to say that you are my friend as well as a fellow SM . (((( idstlou)))
  Jerry from Ohio



Good Morning Monkeys!!!

I am sending out my thank you notes to those who participated with us on Sunday. I think most of you know I invited some of my scouts out. I wanted you to know why. Here is the thank you note I am sending the boys and why it meant so much to me that they participated:



What brave young men you are to come out as you did on Sunday and take a stand and let your voices be heard, I am so proud of you all. You took a stand for a girl who you know of, but never actually knew, that is even more incredible to me. There are people all across America that have also taken a stand for Natalee, and most of us never knew her personally either. You are now part of a very special group of people who have given their voices to a very important cause; Justice for Natalee.

At the beginning of every Cub Scout meeting, we stand and say the Pledge of Allegiance together. We state:

I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America,
And to the Republic for which it stands:
One Nation under God, indivisible,
With Liberty and Justice for all.

I just want to take a minute and tell you why I am so grateful for what you did Sunday, and why I feel it is so important. I think you understand most of the words of the Pledge of Allegiance, but there are three very important words at the end that we are pledging, that we are making a commitment to, and they are; Indivisible, Liberty, and Justice. So I looked those words up in the dictionary and here is what I found:

Indivisible: incapable of being divided.

Liberty: the power of choice. The right to live one’s life without threats, fear, or some kind of retaliation.

Justice: the right to be treated justly, fairly, and according to proper laws and principle.

Our Pledge of Allegiance ends with; for All. These principles we pledge to belong to EVERY AMERICAN regardless of race, religion, color, creed or any other criteria. So my understand is that essentially, we are saying that as Americans, we stand together and can not be divided, and that we are committed to Liberty, to live our lives without fear or threats, but if our Liberty is taken away, then we also are committed to Justice. That those who took away our Liberties must be held responsible according to the Law. If you break the law, then you must be held responsible for your actions.

Unfortunately, Aruba has not given Natalee Justice. Natalee's Liberties were taken away from her when she visited Aruba, and now as Americans, we are standing up to say, Natalee deserves Justice. The bad guys need to go to court and if found guilty, then they should be put in jail. This is what you stood up and said on Sunday when you were passing out the fliers. You were true to your Pledge of Allegiance, and for this, I am so very proud of you. You may be young men, but your voices are strong and you made a difference on Sunday and stood up for our beliefs, as Americans, and as Cub Scouts who Pledge Allegiance to our Flag.

Thank you so much my brave heroes!!!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 11, 2008, 02:13:35 PM
Could it be that the November, 2007 detentions were a ruse ... an opportunity for getting stories straight in regards to the impending fifth video recording?

The planned outcome would distance:

1.  Paulus.
2.  the Kalpoes ... the Kalpoes who have the ability to implicate Paulus.
3.  those who assisted Paulus in moving Natalee from the beach ... those who have the ability to implicate Paulus.
4.  the sons of the elite (pimps).
5.  the gardener's observation and Junior's observation.
6.  those in the Aruban/Dutch administrations who were involved in or aware of the coverup.
7.  the owners of the Exelcior and Carlos 'N Charles from liability ... the establishments where an underage Joran drank and gambled on the evening of May 29, 2005 and the morning of May 30, 2005.

The planned outcome would appease Natalee's family ... provide a measure of closure ... silence a mother who demanded answers ...
 
The planned outcome would assure that a known liar would not be held legally accountable ... the video recording would be ruled inadmissible as evidence.

Janet
 
++++++++++

http://www.dutchnews.nl/news/archives/2008/02/arubans_wary_of_fifth_car_trip.php

Arubans wary of fifth car trip in Holloway case
Monday 25 February 2008

 
Dutch tv crime reporter Peter R de Vries set up a fifth car trip to try and get Joran van der Sloot to confess to murdering US teenager Natalee Holloway after the Aruban public prosecution department said the original four recordings did not contain enough evidence, the Volkskrant reported on Saturday.
 
Aruban officials told De Vries and his team at a secret hotel meeting that the tapes did not contain enough new evidence, the paper says in a reconstruction of events surrounding the tv programme which claimed to solve the mystery of her disappearance.
 
Aruban public prosecutor Hans Mos told the paper he did not want to have anything to do with the extra car trip because he was afraid it could be construed as entrapment and blow the case.
 
The final car trip with Van der Sloot and his 'friend' Patrick van der Eem took place on January 29 in a borrowed car which had been hastily kitted out with recording equipment, the paper said. The original had already been sold.
 
During that trip, Van der Sloot said he was not sure if Natalee had been dead when a friend dumped her body at sea.
 
After the press release was issued claiming the case had been solved but without giving any further details, De Vries told the paper he hoped that Van der Sloot would again phone his 'friend'.
 
But website VKMag picked up a page on De Vries' website which identified Van der Sloot. The page had been prepared for release after the programme was aired on Sunday but had gone live by mistake.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 11, 2008, 02:15:53 PM
Klaas ... would you please fix the link in my post.

Thank you.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 11, 2008, 02:23:41 PM
Klaas ... would you please fix the link in my post.

Thank you.

Janet

Looks like it's fine to me?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: ldstlou on March 11, 2008, 02:30:25 PM
To IDSTLOU:
   Dear sweet Lady you are such a wonderful woman as well as a teacher of the young and as a leader in the Scouting program you have shown these young men that a community that is served by upstanding young men will continue to thrive and prosper , I am not just speaking of financial wealth but wealth in regards in our youth that will grow and be able to stand up responsibly for good verses evil .
  A very heartfelt thank you to you IDSTLOU and may I say again that I am proud to say that you are my friend as well as a fellow SM . (((( idstlou)))
  Jerry from Ohio



Good Morning Monkeys!!!

I am sending out my thank you notes to those who participated with us on Sunday. I think most of you know I invited some of my scouts out. I wanted you to know why. Here is the thank you note I am sending the boys and why it meant so much to me that they participated:



What brave young men you are to come out as you did on Sunday and take a stand and let your voices be heard, I am so proud of you all. You took a stand for a girl who you know of, but never actually knew, that is even more incredible to me. There are people all across America that have also taken a stand for Natalee, and most of us never knew her personally either. You are now part of a very special group of people who have given their voices to a very important cause; Justice for Natalee.

At the beginning of every Cub Scout meeting, we stand and say the Pledge of Allegiance together. We state:

I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America,
And to the Republic for which it stands:
One Nation under God, indivisible,
With Liberty and Justice for all.

I just want to take a minute and tell you why I am so grateful for what you did Sunday, and why I feel it is so important. I think you understand most of the words of the Pledge of Allegiance, but there are three very important words at the end that we are pledging, that we are making a commitment to, and they are; Indivisible, Liberty, and Justice. So I looked those words up in the dictionary and here is what I found:

Indivisible: incapable of being divided.

Liberty: the power of choice. The right to live one’s life without threats, fear, or some kind of retaliation.

Justice: the right to be treated justly, fairly, and according to proper laws and principle.

Our Pledge of Allegiance ends with; for All. These principles we pledge to belong to EVERY AMERICAN regardless of race, religion, color, creed or any other criteria. So my understand is that essentially, we are saying that as Americans, we stand together and can not be divided, and that we are committed to Liberty, to live our lives without fear or threats, but if our Liberty is taken away, then we also are committed to Justice. That those who took away our Liberties must be held responsible according to the Law. If you break the law, then you must be held responsible for your actions.

Unfortunately, Aruba has not given Natalee Justice. Natalee's Liberties were taken away from her when she visited Aruba, and now as Americans, we are standing up to say, Natalee deserves Justice. The bad guys need to go to court and if found guilty, then they should be put in jail. This is what you stood up and said on Sunday when you were passing out the fliers. You were true to your Pledge of Allegiance, and for this, I am so very proud of you. You may be young men, but your voices are strong and you made a difference on Sunday and stood up for our beliefs, as Americans, and as Cub Scouts who Pledge Allegiance to our Flag.

Thank you so much my brave heroes!!!


Oh Jerry, you made me cry, thank you so much!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 11, 2008, 02:45:57 PM
Posted by Marco at RU:

03-05-08 P&W Bram Moszkowics on the show, De Vries or Joran?

Quote from: marco
De Vries or Joran, who's responsible?

Q: Good now were' going to talk about Beth Twitty, Bram Moszkowics, you have contact with her, she's in Holland now to investigate with you if Joran vd Sloot can be juridisch , is it only about Joran or also other family members"

B: At the moment we're only concentrating on Mr. Joran vd Sloot.

Q: How did you get in contact with Mrs. Twitty?

B: Today or yesterday?

Q: No no, back then....Did you contact her?

B: No, that's a misconception, I never call people and ask them if they want to be my client.
I was called by a middleman, she then called me and asked me if I want to represent her, in the beginning she has asked around how she can find someone.

Q: And in the end, somehow she came in contact with you?

B: Yes, that's how it goes.

Q: Does she have an American lawyer?

B: Yes, there was talk about that.......but that's been blown away.

Q: Which judicial system is going to deal with Joran?

B: Either in Holland or Aruba. But that's the same.

Q: Why not in America? Is that not the country of the "claim culture"?

B: That I don't know for sure, I have still not talked to her American Lawyer, but I think that it has to do with the fact where all these awful things happened, and the law enforcement.

Q: We asked Mrs.Twitty what her motivation is, at you office, and this is what she said:

(Beth talking on tape):
We have to hope that the judicial system will kick in and that he will be prosecuted and put behind bars, but you know,  but if that does not happen, you know, we're looking at a civil action, I mean it's too late for Natalee and for us, but it's not too late for other young females that might be in his path.

Q: Lets talk about the different paths you might take. How big of a change, what's the percentage, that you can win, do you have if you begin the procedure?

B: If I confine myself with the civil procedure, I think a 85 - 90% chance that I will do it, but you have to be careful, you understand that also, look this lady can not take much more, so at the moment that you start investigating, as a lawyer you have to be sure, that there is a realistic change is,more than that, that it will succeed, because what's worse for her, if I start a civil case, and Mr. vd Sloot will win, we don't want that.

Q: So a civil case, we're talking about money........

B: No, it's not about money, this woman....................has.....................a civil case, it's that.......I will represent my client and .........we will take legal civil action, not criminal but a civil action.......against vd Sloot.
That means that I am investigating, with other people around me, also on Aruba, if it makes sense that we sue the man for an unlawful act.
Unlawful act, that means  that you did something that in society you should not have been done.
There are two anchors then, I will throw those out, one what we call "shock damage", it's a form of damage, if you experienced something terrible word speaks for itself, and if you have psychological damage, my client has that also, you can demand "shock damage".
That's one way, the other possibility I am looking at, which is also interesting,  is also based on an unlawful act,  if you take someone civil lawful, keep in mind that the man made a confession, because for me there's no question in my mind, that he made the confession a whole lot of different times in that car, and because he kept silent all this time, he committed an unlawful act against my client, because, as an example, my client has been pointed out as a material suspect, and because of this she's suffering.

Q: Because now she's a suspect herself in the disappearance of her daughter?

B: Yes! Just to say something.

Q: But how can Joran vd Sloot help this?

B: Can help what?

Q: How can Joran vd Sloot help, is it his fault that Mrs Twitty has been a suspect herself, for a little while at least?

B: Well that I can tell you, it's because he consistently has denied, until the moment he did confess, has it been possible that the eyes have been pointed towards my client......

Q: But it's his right, loose from the fact IF he did it, it is your right as a suspect, to say you are innocent.

B: That's why I am talking about a civil action with you, than he does not have the right to deny the charges.

Q: That's the difference, that's what you're talking about?

B: Well, in the civil........well lets say in the criminal case the man is a suspect he can keep still, in the civil case, because he's not talking, he has caused her (Mrs Twitty) damage. So here the obligation to keep quiet does not apply here.

Q: And does that only work if can start from the point......if the judge....that  the confessions that he made in the car to Patrick  v d Eem the right confessions are

B: Well look the whole premises, and there will stand or fall the whole case with, how do you appreciate the confession, what Joran said in the car, I, myself have no doubt about that, you can argue about that, I have colleagues they do not agree with me at all, they don't see a confession what so ever, I find that ridiculous,

That was Gerard Sprong, or Mrs Riet (?)

B: I'm not sure, but you can not persevere with dry eyes that vd Sloot 5 times in the car, yes shark, no shark,  he never took one word back, not the day after he had said it, that he never confessed, that's just nonsense.
Whatever this guy has said in the car, that's going to make an impression on the judge.

Q: Shock effect, I want to.......shock effect, damage, what's the shock?

B: That she, my client physiologically has been GEDEKOMPSEERD (I can't translate that word)     (HELP PLEASE)
and she now seeing a psychologist.......

Q: And then how can you say: That's because of you, Joran?

B: Well do you have someone else in mind? You have to connect the dots, and that's what my team and I are investigating right now, to begin with, how did she get "the shock"that can be diagnosed by a psychiatrist, that she's suffering,, I think that's possible, there's a connection, you don't have to be an Einstein to make the connection between the misery this woman has now, and the fact that her daughter has disappeared.

Q: That has to do with the fact, well the confession from Joran in Patric's car, and that's one of the things that will be seen as a confession......

B: That's very important .....

Q: because there is the suggestion that one of the things......this boy is a pathological liar, he just makes stuff up, 

B: I know that, I have heard that, but that's nonsense, because the man has never been investigated by a judge, leave alone a psychiatrist, that people are now screaming that he now, let's say, a habitual liar is, you can't take that serious.

Q: But then, how is it possible, you yourself say: it's a confession, but you can't take it serious, how is it possible then that this boy is still walking around free?

B: It's a very good question, and why that is, is because ....what was said after the De Vries's show?
We do not have enough to rearrest him, I find that remarkable, because if, in the past you had enough to lock him up, what they did on Aruba, WITHOUT  the confession, then I ask myself: What more do you want if they have what they had then, they said them self it's enough to lock him up, then you get a fantastic TV show, where they show the man made 5 confessions, that he said he did it, I think then if you count 1 + 1, that also on Aruba that's 2,

Q: But I think the judge-COMMESARIS, who back then questioned Joran vd Sloot, he came to the conclusion that Joran a big fat liar is, so you can't classify the confession in a car with a lot of camera's as a confession.

B: The  judge-COMMESARIS, should not hide behind that, because if that's the fact because that's not his job, he has to determine if there's enough evidence to pick the man up again, and the same judge found there was enough to pick him up without the confession, that's important what I say now, now he's saying that with the confession there's NOT enough evidence to pick him up again.
Now it's your turn again.......... ha ha

Q: My turn, but you can also say that the "shock damage" that Mrs. Twitty has now, is not because of Joran vd Sloot but De Vries.

B: That's a different question....

Q: It might be a different question, but it's an important one.

B: Look, at the moment my client knows what Peter de Vries got from this man, is it above being a human for he to not look at it, I think, you can't set that  after what she heard from Peter de Vries, you can't say: I don't have to see this.
She wants to know this, I think as a mother, you want to know this. What happened, coming from the mouth of Joran .......

Q: So there's no responsebility for Peter R de Vries?
The question is: who caused the shock damage?
And then you have to take a step back, and say it's the one who's responsible for the show.

B: No, of course not, the shock damage has been caused because of the fact that, and I believe that, that you have to take the confession very serious, and the shock damage has happened because of what the man said he did, he said it himself.
So you can't say: The messenger has caused the shock damage, No it's Mr vd Sloot of course. Because of his actions and what he left behind.

Q: All the confession, let's call them what you call them, all the facts has been checked and they were not happy on Aruba, the boy has not been found, the boat has not been found.

B: That's true what you are saying now, but what you see often in a lawsuit is that a judge will believe a witness even though it's been proven that he lied.
So to judge to believe the witness is not the point, if you can believe him, or catch him in a lie, the judge can think: I can trust him, it makes sense what he says, or a suspect who lies, you can disconnect the two.

Q: Believability is in question, how can you bring the believability in front of a judge?

B: First of all don't forget the criminal case is still ongoing on Aruba, also my client has given me the orders, that as soon as Aruba makes the decision to not prosecute, we're going to MAKEN EEN KLACHT BY HET HOF. (Twitty, even though if the case gets dropped she's going to complain to the court on Aruba)

Lets look again at Mrs. Twitty, what she thought was the most difficult for her to watch during the show.

(Beth on tape)
When he imitated her when she's having a seizure, or is suffering or whatever, that's when......I mean............that's the part that's the most difficult for me to watch, that's this the day, or today .......I just said: I want to come through the Tv and I just want to kill him right there, I mean now I know the answer to what happened to Natalee, and I don't have to constanlty have to spearhead and manage and gosh you know I mean it's just like it's finaly put to rest I guess,

Q: Are you being motivated because of this reason or is it a client that.....?

B: No, I have to tell you that I am more motivated in this case because I can put myself in this woman shoes.

If the case is dropped I can myself bring a complain (by the courts).

Q: When are you yourself sure of the case, When are you going to start?

B: I told my client I will tell her within two weeks.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Tater on March 11, 2008, 03:01:30 PM
Does anyone know anything about this complaining to the court? I've never heard of such a thing.Just curious as to what that means..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 11, 2008, 03:30:43 PM
Anna - I have moved your post to it's own thread.  It has not been deleted nor has it been modified, simply moved so we don't disrupt this new NH discussion thread again.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2694.0


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Tater on March 11, 2008, 03:37:45 PM
Does anyone know anything about this complaining to the court? I've never heard of such a thing.Just curious as to what that means..

yucatexan, snoopy, Bearlyhere, Peaches, truthseeker2, BUCKSHOT, private eye, Ree, spec_ed, trimmonthelake, WhiskeyGirl..Anyone? ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Peaches on March 11, 2008, 03:45:31 PM
Klaas, speaking of moving some posts.....  Could you please move the posts on page 81 of the Prayer Thread to the Peaches Rally Thread?  From pdh3 at the top down to Lala's will do nicely.  Shoulda been there to start with.  TY


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Peaches on March 11, 2008, 03:46:33 PM
Does anyone know anything about this complaining to the court? I've never heard of such a thing.Just curious as to what that means..

Who's complaining to the court?  I just got home so I may be a little behind.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: katrien on March 11, 2008, 03:53:28 PM
Is it possible that Mr. Moszkowicz means this?


http://www.echr.coe.int/echr/







Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 11, 2008, 03:53:29 PM
Klaas, speaking of moving some posts.....  Could you please move the posts on page 81 of the Prayer Thread to the Peaches Rally Thread?  From pdh3 at the top down to Lala's will do nicely.  Shoulda been there to start with.  TY

Will do  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Tater on March 11, 2008, 03:53:42 PM
Posted by Marco at RU:

03-05-08 P&W Bram Moszkowics on the show, De Vries or Joran?

Quote from: marco
De Vries or Joran, who's responsible?

Q: Good now were' going to talk about Beth Twitty, Bram Moszkowics, you have contact with her, she's in Holland now to investigate with you if Joran vd Sloot can be juridisch , is it only about Joran or also other family members"

B: At the moment we're only concentrating on Mr. Joran vd Sloot.

Q: How did you get in contact with Mrs. Twitty?

B: Today or yesterday?

Q: No no, back then....Did you contact her?

B: No, that's a misconception, I never call people and ask them if they want to be my client.
I was called by a middleman, she then called me and asked me if I want to represent her, in the beginning she has asked around how she can find someone.

Q: And in the end, somehow she came in contact with you?

B: Yes, that's how it goes.

Q: Does she have an American lawyer?

B: Yes, there was talk about that.......but that's been blown away.

Q: Which judicial system is going to deal with Joran?

B: Either in Holland or Aruba. But that's the same.

Q: Why not in America? Is that not the country of the "claim culture"?

B: That I don't know for sure, I have still not talked to her American Lawyer, but I think that it has to do with the fact where all these awful things happened, and the law enforcement.

Q: We asked Mrs.Twitty what her motivation is, at you office, and this is what she said:

(Beth talking on tape):
We have to hope that the judicial system will kick in and that he will be prosecuted and put behind bars, but you know,  but if that does not happen, you know, we're looking at a civil action, I mean it's too late for Natalee and for us, but it's not too late for other young females that might be in his path.

Q: Lets talk about the different paths you might take. How big of a change, what's the percentage, that you can win, do you have if you begin the procedure?

B: If I confine myself with the civil procedure, I think a 85 - 90% chance that I will do it, but you have to be careful, you understand that also, look this lady can not take much more, so at the moment that you start investigating, as a lawyer you have to be sure, that there is a realistic change is,more than that, that it will succeed, because what's worse for her, if I start a civil case, and Mr. vd Sloot will win, we don't want that.

Q: So a civil case, we're talking about money........

B: No, it's not about money, this woman....................has.....................a civil case, it's that.......I will represent my client and .........we will take legal civil action, not criminal but a civil action.......against vd Sloot.
That means that I am investigating, with other people around me, also on Aruba, if it makes sense that we sue the man for an unlawful act.
Unlawful act, that means  that you did something that in society you should not have been done.
There are two anchors then, I will throw those out, one what we call "shock damage", it's a form of damage, if you experienced something terrible word speaks for itself, and if you have psychological damage, my client has that also, you can demand "shock damage".
That's one way, the other possibility I am looking at, which is also interesting,  is also based on an unlawful act,  if you take someone civil lawful, keep in mind that the man made a confession, because for me there's no question in my mind, that he made the confession a whole lot of different times in that car, and because he kept silent all this time, he committed an unlawful act against my client, because, as an example, my client has been pointed out as a material suspect, and because of this she's suffering.

Q: Because now she's a suspect herself in the disappearance of her daughter?

B: Yes! Just to say something.

Q: But how can Joran vd Sloot help this?

B: Can help what?

Q: How can Joran vd Sloot help, is it his fault that Mrs Twitty has been a suspect herself, for a little while at least?

B: Well that I can tell you, it's because he consistently has denied, until the moment he did confess, has it been possible that the eyes have been pointed towards my client......

Q: But it's his right, loose from the fact IF he did it, it is your right as a suspect, to say you are innocent.

B: That's why I am talking about a civil action with you, than he does not have the right to deny the charges.

Q: That's the difference, that's what you're talking about?

B: Well, in the civil........well lets say in the criminal case the man is a suspect he can keep still, in the civil case, because he's not talking, he has caused her (Mrs Twitty) damage. So here the obligation to keep quiet does not apply here.

Q: And does that only work if can start from the point......if the judge....that  the confessions that he made in the car to Patrick  v d Eem the right confessions are

B: Well look the whole premises, and there will stand or fall the whole case with, how do you appreciate the confession, what Joran said in the car, I, myself have no doubt about that, you can argue about that, I have colleagues they do not agree with me at all, they don't see a confession what so ever, I find that ridiculous,

That was Gerard Sprong, or Mrs Riet (?)

B: I'm not sure, but you can not persevere with dry eyes that vd Sloot 5 times in the car, yes shark, no shark,  he never took one word back, not the day after he had said it, that he never confessed, that's just nonsense.
Whatever this guy has said in the car, that's going to make an impression on the judge.

Q: Shock effect, I want to.......shock effect, damage, what's the shock?

B: That she, my client physiologically has been GEDEKOMPSEERD (I can't translate that word)     (HELP PLEASE)
and she now seeing a psychologist.......

Q: And then how can you say: That's because of you, Joran?

B: Well do you have someone else in mind? You have to connect the dots, and that's what my team and I are investigating right now, to begin with, how did she get "the shock"that can be diagnosed by a psychiatrist, that she's suffering,, I think that's possible, there's a connection, you don't have to be an Einstein to make the connection between the misery this woman has now, and the fact that her daughter has disappeared.

Q: That has to do with the fact, well the confession from Joran in Patric's car, and that's one of the things that will be seen as a confession......

B: That's very important .....

Q: because there is the suggestion that one of the things......this boy is a pathological liar, he just makes stuff up, 

B: I know that, I have heard that, but that's nonsense, because the man has never been investigated by a judge, leave alone a psychiatrist, that people are now screaming that he now, let's say, a habitual liar is, you can't take that serious.

Q: But then, how is it possible, you yourself say: it's a confession, but you can't take it serious, how is it possible then that this boy is still walking around free?

B: It's a very good question, and why that is, is because ....what was said after the De Vries's show?
We do not have enough to rearrest him, I find that remarkable, because if, in the past you had enough to lock him up, what they did on Aruba, WITHOUT  the confession, then I ask myself: What more do you want if they have what they had then, they said them self it's enough to lock him up, then you get a fantastic TV show, where they show the man made 5 confessions, that he said he did it, I think then if you count 1 + 1, that also on Aruba that's 2,

Q: But I think the judge-COMMESARIS, who back then questioned Joran vd Sloot, he came to the conclusion that Joran a big fat liar is, so you can't classify the confession in a car with a lot of camera's as a confession.

B: The  judge-COMMESARIS, should not hide behind that, because if that's the fact because that's not his job, he has to determine if there's enough evidence to pick the man up again, and the same judge found there was enough to pick him up without the confession, that's important what I say now, now he's saying that with the confession there's NOT enough evidence to pick him up again.
Now it's your turn again.......... ha ha

Q: My turn, but you can also say that the "shock damage" that Mrs. Twitty has now, is not because of Joran vd Sloot but De Vries.

B: That's a different question....

Q: It might be a different question, but it's an important one.

B: Look, at the moment my client knows what Peter de Vries got from this man, is it above being a human for he to not look at it, I think, you can't set that  after what she heard from Peter de Vries, you can't say: I don't have to see this.
She wants to know this, I think as a mother, you want to know this. What happened, coming from the mouth of Joran .......

Q: So there's no responsebility for Peter R de Vries?
The question is: who caused the shock damage?
And then you have to take a step back, and say it's the one who's responsible for the show.

B: No, of course not, the shock damage has been caused because of the fact that, and I believe that, that you have to take the confession very serious, and the shock damage has happened because of what the man said he did, he said it himself.
So you can't say: The messenger has caused the shock damage, No it's Mr vd Sloot of course. Because of his actions and what he left behind.

Q: All the confession, let's call them what you call them, all the facts has been checked and they were not happy on Aruba, the boy has not been found, the boat has not been found.

B: That's true what you are saying now, but what you see often in a lawsuit is that a judge will believe a witness even though it's been proven that he lied.
So to judge to believe the witness is not the point, if you can believe him, or catch him in a lie, the judge can think: I can trust him, it makes sense what he says, or a suspect who lies, you can disconnect the two.

Q: Believability is in question, how can you bring the believability in front of a judge?

B: First of all don't forget the criminal case is still ongoing on Aruba, also my client has given me the orders, that as soon as Aruba makes the decision to not prosecute, we're going to MAKEN EEN KLACHT BY HET HOF. (Twitty, even though if the case gets dropped she's going to complain to the court on Aruba)

Lets look again at Mrs. Twitty, what she thought was the most difficult for her to watch during the show.

(Beth on tape)
When he imitated her when she's having a seizure, or is suffering or whatever, that's when......I mean............that's the part that's the most difficult for me to watch, that's this the day, or today .......I just said: I want to come through the Tv and I just want to kill him right there, I mean now I know the answer to what happened to Natalee, and I don't have to constanlty have to spearhead and manage and gosh you know I mean it's just like it's finaly put to rest I guess,

Q: Are you being motivated because of this reason or is it a client that.....?

B: No, I have to tell you that I am more motivated in this case because I can put myself in this woman shoes.

If the case is dropped I can myself bring a complain (by the courts).

Q: When are you yourself sure of the case, When are you going to start?

B: I told my client I will tell her within two weeks.


Here Peaches..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Tater on March 11, 2008, 03:56:52 PM
Is it possible that Mr. Moszkowicz means this?


http://www.echr.coe.int/echr/


 :smt102








Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: suisse71 on March 11, 2008, 04:04:33 PM
Posted by Marco at RU:

03-05-08 P&W Bram Moszkowics on the show, De Vries or Joran?

Quote from: marco
De Vries or Joran, who's responsible?

Q: Good now were' going to talk about Beth Twitty, Bram Moszkowics, you have contact with her, she's in Holland now to investigate with you if Joran vd Sloot can be juridisch , is it only about Joran or also other family members"

B: At the moment we're only concentrating on Mr. Joran vd Sloot.

Q: How did you get in contact with Mrs. Twitty?

B: Today or yesterday?

Q: No no, back then....Did you contact her?

B: No, that's a misconception, I never call people and ask them if they want to be my client.
I was called by a middleman, she then called me and asked me if I want to represent her, in the beginning she has asked around how she can find someone.

Q: And in the end, somehow she came in contact with you?

B: Yes, that's how it goes.

Q: Does she have an American lawyer?

B: Yes, there was talk about that.......but that's been blown away.

Q: Which judicial system is going to deal with Joran?

B: Either in Holland or Aruba. But that's the same.

Q: Why not in America? Is that not the country of the "claim culture"?

B: That I don't know for sure, I have still not talked to her American Lawyer, but I think that it has to do with the fact where all these awful things happened, and the law enforcement.

Q: We asked Mrs.Twitty what her motivation is, at you office, and this is what she said:

(Beth talking on tape):
We have to hope that the judicial system will kick in and that he will be prosecuted and put behind bars, but you know,  but if that does not happen, you know, we're looking at a civil action, I mean it's too late for Natalee and for us, but it's not too late for other young females that might be in his path.

Q: Lets talk about the different paths you might take. How big of a change, what's the percentage, that you can win, do you have if you begin the procedure?

B: If I confine myself with the civil procedure, I think a 85 - 90% chance that I will do it, but you have to be careful, you understand that also, look this lady can not take much more, so at the moment that you start investigating, as a lawyer you have to be sure, that there is a realistic change is,more than that, that it will succeed, because what's worse for her, if I start a civil case, and Mr. vd Sloot will win, we don't want that.

Q: So a civil case, we're talking about money........

B: No, it's not about money, this woman....................has.....................a civil case, it's that.......I will represent my client and .........we will take legal civil action, not criminal but a civil action.......against vd Sloot.
That means that I am investigating, with other people around me, also on Aruba, if it makes sense that we sue the man for an unlawful act.
Unlawful act, that means  that you did something that in society you should not have been done.
There are two anchors then, I will throw those out, one what we call "shock damage", it's a form of damage, if you experienced something terrible word speaks for itself, and if you have psychological damage, my client has that also, you can demand "shock damage".
That's one way, the other possibility I am looking at, which is also interesting,  is also based on an unlawful act,  if you take someone civil lawful, keep in mind that the man made a confession, because for me there's no question in my mind, that he made the confession a whole lot of different times in that car, and because he kept silent all this time, he committed an unlawful act against my client, because, as an example, my client has been pointed out as a material suspect, and because of this she's suffering.

Q: Because now she's a suspect herself in the disappearance of her daughter?

B: Yes! Just to say something.

Q: But how can Joran vd Sloot help this?

B: Can help what?

Q: How can Joran vd Sloot help, is it his fault that Mrs Twitty has been a suspect herself, for a little while at least?

B: Well that I can tell you, it's because he consistently has denied, until the moment he did confess, has it been possible that the eyes have been pointed towards my client......

Q: But it's his right, loose from the fact IF he did it, it is your right as a suspect, to say you are innocent.

B: That's why I am talking about a civil action with you, than he does not have the right to deny the charges.

Q: That's the difference, that's what you're talking about?

B: Well, in the civil........well lets say in the criminal case the man is a suspect he can keep still, in the civil case, because he's not talking, he has caused her (Mrs Twitty) damage. So here the obligation to keep quiet does not apply here.

Q: And does that only work if can start from the point......if the judge....that  the confessions that he made in the car to Patrick  v d Eem the right confessions are

B: Well look the whole premises, and there will stand or fall the whole case with, how do you appreciate the confession, what Joran said in the car, I, myself have no doubt about that, you can argue about that, I have colleagues they do not agree with me at all, they don't see a confession what so ever, I find that ridiculous,

That was Gerard Sprong, or Mrs Riet (?)

B: I'm not sure, but you can not persevere with dry eyes that vd Sloot 5 times in the car, yes shark, no shark,  he never took one word back, not the day after he had said it, that he never confessed, that's just nonsense.
Whatever this guy has said in the car, that's going to make an impression on the judge.

Q: Shock effect, I want to.......shock effect, damage, what's the shock?

B: That she, my client physiologically has been GEDEKOMPSEERD (I can't translate that word)     (HELP PLEASE)
and she now seeing a psychologist.......

Q: And then how can you say: That's because of you, Joran?

B: Well do you have someone else in mind? You have to connect the dots, and that's what my team and I are investigating right now, to begin with, how did she get "the shock"that can be diagnosed by a psychiatrist, that she's suffering,, I think that's possible, there's a connection, you don't have to be an Einstein to make the connection between the misery this woman has now, and the fact that her daughter has disappeared.

Q: That has to do with the fact, well the confession from Joran in Patric's car, and that's one of the things that will be seen as a confession......

B: That's very important .....

Q: because there is the suggestion that one of the things......this boy is a pathological liar, he just makes stuff up, 

B: I know that, I have heard that, but that's nonsense, because the man has never been investigated by a judge, leave alone a psychiatrist, that people are now screaming that he now, let's say, a habitual liar is, you can't take that serious.

Q: But then, how is it possible, you yourself say: it's a confession, but you can't take it serious, how is it possible then that this boy is still walking around free?

B: It's a very good question, and why that is, is because ....what was said after the De Vries's show?
We do not have enough to rearrest him, I find that remarkable, because if, in the past you had enough to lock him up, what they did on Aruba, WITHOUT  the confession, then I ask myself: What more do you want if they have what they had then, they said them self it's enough to lock him up, then you get a fantastic TV show, where they show the man made 5 confessions, that he said he did it, I think then if you count 1 + 1, that also on Aruba that's 2,

Q: But I think the judge-COMMESARIS, who back then questioned Joran vd Sloot, he came to the conclusion that Joran a big fat liar is, so you can't classify the confession in a car with a lot of camera's as a confession.

B: The  judge-COMMESARIS, should not hide behind that, because if that's the fact because that's not his job, he has to determine if there's enough evidence to pick the man up again, and the same judge found there was enough to pick him up without the confession, that's important what I say now, now he's saying that with the confession there's NOT enough evidence to pick him up again.
Now it's your turn again.......... ha ha

Q: My turn, but you can also say that the "shock damage" that Mrs. Twitty has now, is not because of Joran vd Sloot but De Vries.

B: That's a different question....

Q: It might be a different question, but it's an important one.

B: Look, at the moment my client knows what Peter de Vries got from this man, is it above being a human for he to not look at it, I think, you can't set that  after what she heard from Peter de Vries, you can't say: I don't have to see this.
She wants to know this, I think as a mother, you want to know this. What happened, coming from the mouth of Joran .......

Q: So there's no responsebility for Peter R de Vries?
The question is: who caused the shock damage?
And then you have to take a step back, and say it's the one who's responsible for the show.

B: No, of course not, the shock damage has been caused because of the fact that, and I believe that, that you have to take the confession very serious, and the shock damage has happened because of what the man said he did, he said it himself.
So you can't say: The messenger has caused the shock damage, No it's Mr vd Sloot of course. Because of his actions and what he left behind.

Q: All the confession, let's call them what you call them, all the facts has been checked and they were not happy on Aruba, the boy has not been found, the boat has not been found.

B: That's true what you are saying now, but what you see often in a lawsuit is that a judge will believe a witness even though it's been proven that he lied.
So to judge to believe the witness is not the point, if you can believe him, or catch him in a lie, the judge can think: I can trust him, it makes sense what he says, or a suspect who lies, you can disconnect the two.

Q: Believability is in question, how can you bring the believability in front of a judge?

B: First of all don't forget the criminal case is still ongoing on Aruba, also my client has given me the orders, that as soon as Aruba makes the decision to not prosecute, we're going to MAKEN EEN KLACHT BY HET HOF. (Twitty, even though if the case gets dropped she's going to complain to the court on Aruba)

Lets look again at Mrs. Twitty, what she thought was the most difficult for her to watch during the show.

(Beth on tape)
When he imitated her when she's having a seizure, or is suffering or whatever, that's when......I mean............that's the part that's the most difficult for me to watch, that's this the day, or today .......I just said: I want to come through the Tv and I just want to kill him right there, I mean now I know the answer to what happened to Natalee, and I don't have to constanlty have to spearhead and manage and gosh you know I mean it's just like it's finaly put to rest I guess,

Q: Are you being motivated because of this reason or is it a client that.....?

B: No, I have to tell you that I am more motivated in this case because I can put myself in this woman shoes.

If the case is dropped I can myself bring a complain (by the courts).

Q: When are you yourself sure of the case, When are you going to start?

B: I told my client I will tell her within two weeks.


Here Peaches..


Hi Tot,

I have not heard of this either.  Maybe our new Dutch friends can help us to understand this type of civil suit.
I do hope Bram seriously believes he can win this for Beth, otherwise why even mention it?

BTW, do you have the link to that zorpia site mentioned in earlier thread.  Not had a chance to look into it.

Also, back in Feb. Art Wood was on Dana's show and he said he found the Gottenbos boat and gave that 411 to Mos.  Any updates on that?

j4n!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: private eye on March 11, 2008, 04:07:51 PM
To IDSTLOU:
   Dear sweet Lady you are such a wonderful woman as well as a teacher of the young and as a leader in the Scouting program you have shown these young men that a community that is served by upstanding young men will continue to thrive and prosper , I am not just speaking of financial wealth but wealth in regards in our youth that will grow and be able to stand up responsibly for good verses evil .
  A very heartfelt thank you to you IDSTLOU and may I say again that I am proud to say that you are my friend as well as a fellow SM . (((( idstlou)))
  Jerry from Ohio



Good Morning Monkeys!!!

I am sending out my thank you notes to those who participated with us on Sunday. I think most of you know I invited some of my scouts out. I wanted you to know why. Here is the thank you note I am sending the boys and why it meant so much to me that they participated:



What brave young men you are to come out as you did on Sunday and take a stand and let your voices be heard, I am so proud of you all. You took a stand for a girl who you know of, but never actually knew, that is even more incredible to me. There are people all across America that have also taken a stand for Natalee, and most of us never knew her personally either. You are now part of a very special group of people who have given their voices to a very important cause; Justice for Natalee.

At the beginning of every Cub Scout meeting, we stand and say the Pledge of Allegiance together. We state:

I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America,
And to the Republic for which it stands:
One Nation under God, indivisible,
With Liberty and Justice for all.

I just want to take a minute and tell you why I am so grateful for what you did Sunday, and why I feel it is so important. I think you understand most of the words of the Pledge of Allegiance, but there are three very important words at the end that we are pledging, that we are making a commitment to, and they are; Indivisible, Liberty, and Justice. So I looked those words up in the dictionary and here is what I found:

Indivisible: incapable of being divided.

Liberty: the power of choice. The right to live one’s life without threats, fear, or some kind of retaliation.

Justice: the right to be treated justly, fairly, and according to proper laws and principle.

Our Pledge of Allegiance ends with; for All. These principles we pledge to belong to EVERY AMERICAN regardless of race, religion, color, creed or any other criteria. So my understand is that essentially, we are saying that as Americans, we stand together and can not be divided, and that we are committed to Liberty, to live our lives without fear or threats, but if our Liberty is taken away, then we also are committed to Justice. That those who took away our Liberties must be held responsible according to the Law. If you break the law, then you must be held responsible for your actions.

Unfortunately, Aruba has not given Natalee Justice. Natalee's Liberties were taken away from her when she visited Aruba, and now as Americans, we are standing up to say, Natalee deserves Justice. The bad guys need to go to court and if found guilty, then they should be put in jail. This is what you stood up and said on Sunday when you were passing out the fliers. You were true to your Pledge of Allegiance, and for this, I am so very proud of you. You may be young men, but your voices are strong and you made a difference on Sunday and stood up for our beliefs, as Americans, and as Cub Scouts who Pledge Allegiance to our Flag.

Thank you so much my brave heroes!!!


Oh Jerry, you made me cry, thank you so much!!!

Those boys are defintely standing with the girl and "Modern Day Heroes!" Their leader is pretty great as well:))))))))) Good work men! Why is there always a woman standing behind a good man????????????????????????????????????????/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: private eye on March 11, 2008, 04:10:56 PM
Posted by Marco at RU:

03-05-08 P&W Bram Moszkowics on the show, De Vries or Joran?

Quote from: marco
De Vries or Joran, who's responsible?

Q: Good now were' going to talk about Beth Twitty, Bram Moszkowics, you have contact with her, she's in Holland now to investigate with you if Joran vd Sloot can be juridisch , is it only about Joran or also other family members"

B: At the moment we're only concentrating on Mr. Joran vd Sloot.

Q: How did you get in contact with Mrs. Twitty?

B: Today or yesterday?

Q: No no, back then....Did you contact her?

B: No, that's a misconception, I never call people and ask them if they want to be my client.
I was called by a middleman, she then called me and asked me if I want to represent her, in the beginning she has asked around how she can find someone.

Q: And in the end, somehow she came in contact with you?

B: Yes, that's how it goes.

Q: Does she have an American lawyer?

B: Yes, there was talk about that.......but that's been blown away.

Q: Which judicial system is going to deal with Joran?

B: Either in Holland or Aruba. But that's the same.

Q: Why not in America? Is that not the country of the "claim culture"?

B: That I don't know for sure, I have still not talked to her American Lawyer, but I think that it has to do with the fact where all these awful things happened, and the law enforcement.

Q: We asked Mrs.Twitty what her motivation is, at you office, and this is what she said:

(Beth talking on tape):
We have to hope that the judicial system will kick in and that he will be prosecuted and put behind bars, but you know,  but if that does not happen, you know, we're looking at a civil action, I mean it's too late for Natalee and for us, but it's not too late for other young females that might be in his path.

Q: Lets talk about the different paths you might take. How big of a change, what's the percentage, that you can win, do you have if you begin the procedure?

B: If I confine myself with the civil procedure, I think a 85 - 90% chance that I will do it, but you have to be careful, you understand that also, look this lady can not take much more, so at the moment that you start investigating, as a lawyer you have to be sure, that there is a realistic change is,more than that, that it will succeed, because what's worse for her, if I start a civil case, and Mr. vd Sloot will win, we don't want that.

Q: So a civil case, we're talking about money........

B: No, it's not about money, this woman....................has.....................a civil case, it's that.......I will represent my client and .........we will take legal civil action, not criminal but a civil action.......against vd Sloot.
That means that I am investigating, with other people around me, also on Aruba, if it makes sense that we sue the man for an unlawful act.
Unlawful act, that means  that you did something that in society you should not have been done.
There are two anchors then, I will throw those out, one what we call "shock damage", it's a form of damage, if you experienced something terrible word speaks for itself, and if you have psychological damage, my client has that also, you can demand "shock damage".
That's one way, the other possibility I am looking at, which is also interesting,  is also based on an unlawful act,  if you take someone civil lawful, keep in mind that the man made a confession, because for me there's no question in my mind, that he made the confession a whole lot of different times in that car, and because he kept silent all this time, he committed an unlawful act against my client, because, as an example, my client has been pointed out as a material suspect, and because of this she's suffering.

Q: Because now she's a suspect herself in the disappearance of her daughter?

B: Yes! Just to say something.

Q: But how can Joran vd Sloot help this?

B: Can help what?

Q: How can Joran vd Sloot help, is it his fault that Mrs Twitty has been a suspect herself, for a little while at least?

B: Well that I can tell you, it's because he consistently has denied, until the moment he did confess, has it been possible that the eyes have been pointed towards my client......

Q: But it's his right, loose from the fact IF he did it, it is your right as a suspect, to say you are innocent.

B: That's why I am talking about a civil action with you, than he does not have the right to deny the charges.

Q: That's the difference, that's what you're talking about?

B: Well, in the civil........well lets say in the criminal case the man is a suspect he can keep still, in the civil case, because he's not talking, he has caused her (Mrs Twitty) damage. So here the obligation to keep quiet does not apply here.

Q: And does that only work if can start from the point......if the judge....that  the confessions that he made in the car to Patrick  v d Eem the right confessions are

B: Well look the whole premises, and there will stand or fall the whole case with, how do you appreciate the confession, what Joran said in the car, I, myself have no doubt about that, you can argue about that, I have colleagues they do not agree with me at all, they don't see a confession what so ever, I find that ridiculous,

That was Gerard Sprong, or Mrs Riet (?)

B: I'm not sure, but you can not persevere with dry eyes that vd Sloot 5 times in the car, yes shark, no shark,  he never took one word back, not the day after he had said it, that he never confessed, that's just nonsense.
Whatever this guy has said in the car, that's going to make an impression on the judge.

Q: Shock effect, I want to.......shock effect, damage, what's the shock?

B: That she, my client physiologically has been GEDEKOMPSEERD (I can't translate that word)     (HELP PLEASE)
and she now seeing a psychologist.......

Q: And then how can you say: That's because of you, Joran?

B: Well do you have someone else in mind? You have to connect the dots, and that's what my team and I are investigating right now, to begin with, how did she get "the shock"that can be diagnosed by a psychiatrist, that she's suffering,, I think that's possible, there's a connection, you don't have to be an Einstein to make the connection between the misery this woman has now, and the fact that her daughter has disappeared.

Q: That has to do with the fact, well the confession from Joran in Patric's car, and that's one of the things that will be seen as a confession......

B: That's very important .....

Q: because there is the suggestion that one of the things......this boy is a pathological liar, he just makes stuff up, 

B: I know that, I have heard that, but that's nonsense, because the man has never been investigated by a judge, leave alone a psychiatrist, that people are now screaming that he now, let's say, a habitual liar is, you can't take that serious.

Q: But then, how is it possible, you yourself say: it's a confession, but you can't take it serious, how is it possible then that this boy is still walking around free?

B: It's a very good question, and why that is, is because ....what was said after the De Vries's show?
We do not have enough to rearrest him, I find that remarkable, because if, in the past you had enough to lock him up, what they did on Aruba, WITHOUT  the confession, then I ask myself: What more do you want if they have what they had then, they said them self it's enough to lock him up, then you get a fantastic TV show, where they show the man made 5 confessions, that he said he did it, I think then if you count 1 + 1, that also on Aruba that's 2,

Q: But I think the judge-COMMESARIS, who back then questioned Joran vd Sloot, he came to the conclusion that Joran a big fat liar is, so you can't classify the confession in a car with a lot of camera's as a confession.

B: The  judge-COMMESARIS, should not hide behind that, because if that's the fact because that's not his job, he has to determine if there's enough evidence to pick the man up again, and the same judge found there was enough to pick him up without the confession, that's important what I say now, now he's saying that with the confession there's NOT enough evidence to pick him up again.
Now it's your turn again.......... ha ha

Q: My turn, but you can also say that the "shock damage" that Mrs. Twitty has now, is not because of Joran vd Sloot but De Vries.

B: That's a different question....

Q: It might be a different question, but it's an important one.

B: Look, at the moment my client knows what Peter de Vries got from this man, is it above being a human for he to not look at it, I think, you can't set that  after what she heard from Peter de Vries, you can't say: I don't have to see this.
She wants to know this, I think as a mother, you want to know this. What happened, coming from the mouth of Joran .......

Q: So there's no responsebility for Peter R de Vries?
The question is: who caused the shock damage?
And then you have to take a step back, and say it's the one who's responsible for the show.

B: No, of course not, the shock damage has been caused because of the fact that, and I believe that, that you have to take the confession very serious, and the shock damage has happened because of what the man said he did, he said it himself.
So you can't say: The messenger has caused the shock damage, No it's Mr vd Sloot of course. Because of his actions and what he left behind.

Q: All the confession, let's call them what you call them, all the facts has been checked and they were not happy on Aruba, the boy has not been found, the boat has not been found.

B: That's true what you are saying now, but what you see often in a lawsuit is that a judge will believe a witness even though it's been proven that he lied.
So to judge to believe the witness is not the point, if you can believe him, or catch him in a lie, the judge can think: I can trust him, it makes sense what he says, or a suspect who lies, you can disconnect the two.

Q: Believability is in question, how can you bring the believability in front of a judge?

B: First of all don't forget the criminal case is still ongoing on Aruba, also my client has given me the orders, that as soon as Aruba makes the decision to not prosecute, we're going to MAKEN EEN KLACHT BY HET HOF. (Twitty, even though if the case gets dropped she's going to complain to the court on Aruba)

Lets look again at Mrs. Twitty, what she thought was the most difficult for her to watch during the show.

(Beth on tape)
When he imitated her when she's having a seizure, or is suffering or whatever, that's when......I mean............that's the part that's the most difficult for me to watch, that's this the day, or today .......I just said: I want to come through the Tv and I just want to kill him right there, I mean now I know the answer to what happened to Natalee, and I don't have to constanlty have to spearhead and manage and gosh you know I mean it's just like it's finaly put to rest I guess,

Q: Are you being motivated because of this reason or is it a client that.....?

B: No, I have to tell you that I am more motivated in this case because I can put myself in this woman shoes.

If the case is dropped I can myself bring a complain (by the courts).

Q: When are you yourself sure of the case, When are you going to start?

B: I told my client I will tell her within two weeks.


Here Peaches..


Hi Tot,

I have not heard of this either.  Maybe our new Dutch friends can help us to understand this type of civil suit.
I do hope Bram seriously believes he can win this for Beth, otherwise why even mention it?

BTW, do you have the link to that zorpia site mentioned in earlier thread.  Not had a chance to look into it.

Also, back in Feb. Art Wood was on Dana's show and he said he found the Gottenbos boat and gave that 411 to Mos.  Any updates on that?

j4n!!

I am not an attorney, in the US or Holland, but I think it goes like this. If the prosecutor decides to not prosecute a case, and formally drops the case, then the victim can hire an attorney and prosecute the case themself. They get the complete file.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Anna on March 11, 2008, 04:17:57 PM
Private Eye,

Please contact me at email Anna.bama.bama@gmail.com.

Yes, I know that is a corny address to use and no offense to Auburn fans but it was hard to find a username not already taken!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: private eye on March 11, 2008, 04:18:11 PM
Hi Monkey's,
  Just got caught up reading.Watched the video link and listened to Dave and Beth.Seem's Dave thinks it all went down at the Sloots house..Bless his heart and Beth's heart too..One thing I've always wondered about and that is why Dave had to find out from his son that Natalee was missing.I wonder why Beth or Jug didn't call him immediatly..I don't know,just sad...
And you are trying to do what with your question.  Read the books.  Good try.  Not working.     Jack blue


You're way out of line jackb..It was a fair question and it's one that's asked by many people that don't care to go out and buy books to get the answer.This question was answered very nicely which you would have seen had you of scrolled down to see.Do not ever and I mean ever accuse me of anything,especially the act of manipulation.That is an evil accusation and I do not appreciate it one bit.When your pointing your finger at someone else,you've got three pointing right back at you.You might want to remember that!Like I said,it was a fair question and a fair answer followed..God Bless

This is the second time in the last week or so that I have seen this very same question, almost word for word, so it must be on everyone's mind. What was the fair answer and did it get answered fairly both times? I missed both answers but I definetly remember the question. Just curious.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Anna on March 11, 2008, 04:21:59 PM
Anna - I have moved your post to it's own thread.  It has not been deleted nor has it been modified, simply moved so we don't disrupt this new NH discussion thread again.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2694.0


Thank you, Klaas,

Not my intention to disrupt.  Yes, the new discussion if far more interesting.  I find it very offensive that Beth is referred to as a suspect, however. 

Since when?  Does this go back to Dompig and his bogus insurance claim or since the last time they were in Aruba and were questioned possibly in relation to the Psycho Psychics?

Perhaps more will be forthcoming on this.  I could see her being called a WITNESS but never a suspect.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 11, 2008, 04:25:22 PM
Anna - my guess is Beth being called a suspect comes from the Kelly & Young and Renee Gielen documetary (I could be wrong).


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Tater on March 11, 2008, 04:27:43 PM
Posted by Marco at RU:

03-05-08 P&W Bram Moszkowics on the show, De Vries or Joran?

Quote from: marco
De Vries or Joran, who's responsible?

Q: Good now were' going to talk about Beth Twitty, Bram Moszkowics, you have contact with her, she's in Holland now to investigate with you if Joran vd Sloot can be juridisch , is it only about Joran or also other family members"

B: At the moment we're only concentrating on Mr. Joran vd Sloot.

Q: How did you get in contact with Mrs. Twitty?

B: Today or yesterday?

Q: No no, back then....Did you contact her?

B: No, that's a misconception, I never call people and ask them if they want to be my client.
I was called by a middleman, she then called me and asked me if I want to represent her, in the beginning she has asked around how she can find someone.

Q: And in the end, somehow she came in contact with you?

B: Yes, that's how it goes.

Q: Does she have an American lawyer?

B: Yes, there was talk about that.......but that's been blown away.

Q: Which judicial system is going to deal with Joran?

B: Either in Holland or Aruba. But that's the same.

Q: Why not in America? Is that not the country of the "claim culture"?

B: That I don't know for sure, I have still not talked to her American Lawyer, but I think that it has to do with the fact where all these awful things happened, and the law enforcement.

Q: We asked Mrs.Twitty what her motivation is, at you office, and this is what she said:

(Beth talking on tape):
We have to hope that the judicial system will kick in and that he will be prosecuted and put behind bars, but you know,  but if that does not happen, you know, we're looking at a civil action, I mean it's too late for Natalee and for us, but it's not too late for other young females that might be in his path.

Q: Lets talk about the different paths you might take. How big of a change, what's the percentage, that you can win, do you have if you begin the procedure?

B: If I confine myself with the civil procedure, I think a 85 - 90% chance that I will do it, but you have to be careful, you understand that also, look this lady can not take much more, so at the moment that you start investigating, as a lawyer you have to be sure, that there is a realistic change is,more than that, that it will succeed, because what's worse for her, if I start a civil case, and Mr. vd Sloot will win, we don't want that.

Q: So a civil case, we're talking about money........

B: No, it's not about money, this woman....................has.....................a civil case, it's that.......I will represent my client and .........we will take legal civil action, not criminal but a civil action.......against vd Sloot.
That means that I am investigating, with other people around me, also on Aruba, if it makes sense that we sue the man for an unlawful act.
Unlawful act, that means  that you did something that in society you should not have been done.
There are two anchors then, I will throw those out, one what we call "shock damage", it's a form of damage, if you experienced something terrible word speaks for itself, and if you have psychological damage, my client has that also, you can demand "shock damage".
That's one way, the other possibility I am looking at, which is also interesting,  is also based on an unlawful act,  if you take someone civil lawful, keep in mind that the man made a confession, because for me there's no question in my mind, that he made the confession a whole lot of different times in that car, and because he kept silent all this time, he committed an unlawful act against my client, because, as an example, my client has been pointed out as a material suspect, and because of this she's suffering.

Q: Because now she's a suspect herself in the disappearance of her daughter?

B: Yes! Just to say something.

Q: But how can Joran vd Sloot help this?

B: Can help what?

Q: How can Joran vd Sloot help, is it his fault that Mrs Twitty has been a suspect herself, for a little while at least?

B: Well that I can tell you, it's because he consistently has denied, until the moment he did confess, has it been possible that the eyes have been pointed towards my client......

Q: But it's his right, loose from the fact IF he did it, it is your right as a suspect, to say you are innocent.

B: That's why I am talking about a civil action with you, than he does not have the right to deny the charges.

Q: That's the difference, that's what you're talking about?

B: Well, in the civil........well lets say in the criminal case the man is a suspect he can keep still, in the civil case, because he's not talking, he has caused her (Mrs Twitty) damage. So here the obligation to keep quiet does not apply here.

Q: And does that only work if can start from the point......if the judge....that  the confessions that he made in the car to Patrick  v d Eem the right confessions are

B: Well look the whole premises, and there will stand or fall the whole case with, how do you appreciate the confession, what Joran said in the car, I, myself have no doubt about that, you can argue about that, I have colleagues they do not agree with me at all, they don't see a confession what so ever, I find that ridiculous,

That was Gerard Sprong, or Mrs Riet (?)

B: I'm not sure, but you can not persevere with dry eyes that vd Sloot 5 times in the car, yes shark, no shark,  he never took one word back, not the day after he had said it, that he never confessed, that's just nonsense.
Whatever this guy has said in the car, that's going to make an impression on the judge.

Q: Shock effect, I want to.......shock effect, damage, what's the shock?

B: That she, my client physiologically has been GEDEKOMPSEERD (I can't translate that word)     (HELP PLEASE)
and she now seeing a psychologist.......

Q: And then how can you say: That's because of you, Joran?

B: Well do you have someone else in mind? You have to connect the dots, and that's what my team and I are investigating right now, to begin with, how did she get "the shock"that can be diagnosed by a psychiatrist, that she's suffering,, I think that's possible, there's a connection, you don't have to be an Einstein to make the connection between the misery this woman has now, and the fact that her daughter has disappeared.

Q: That has to do with the fact, well the confession from Joran in Patric's car, and that's one of the things that will be seen as a confession......

B: That's very important .....

Q: because there is the suggestion that one of the things......this boy is a pathological liar, he just makes stuff up, 

B: I know that, I have heard that, but that's nonsense, because the man has never been investigated by a judge, leave alone a psychiatrist, that people are now screaming that he now, let's say, a habitual liar is, you can't take that serious.

Q: But then, how is it possible, you yourself say: it's a confession, but you can't take it serious, how is it possible then that this boy is still walking around free?

B: It's a very good question, and why that is, is because ....what was said after the De Vries's show?
We do not have enough to rearrest him, I find that remarkable, because if, in the past you had enough to lock him up, what they did on Aruba, WITHOUT  the confession, then I ask myself: What more do you want if they have what they had then, they said them self it's enough to lock him up, then you get a fantastic TV show, where they show the man made 5 confessions, that he said he did it, I think then if you count 1 + 1, that also on Aruba that's 2,

Q: But I think the judge-COMMESARIS, who back then questioned Joran vd Sloot, he came to the conclusion that Joran a big fat liar is, so you can't classify the confession in a car with a lot of camera's as a confession.

B: The  judge-COMMESARIS, should not hide behind that, because if that's the fact because that's not his job, he has to determine if there's enough evidence to pick the man up again, and the same judge found there was enough to pick him up without the confession, that's important what I say now, now he's saying that with the confession there's NOT enough evidence to pick him up again.
Now it's your turn again.......... ha ha

Q: My turn, but you can also say that the "shock damage" that Mrs. Twitty has now, is not because of Joran vd Sloot but De Vries.

B: That's a different question....

Q: It might be a different question, but it's an important one.

B: Look, at the moment my client knows what Peter de Vries got from this man, is it above being a human for he to not look at it, I think, you can't set that  after what she heard from Peter de Vries, you can't say: I don't have to see this.
She wants to know this, I think as a mother, you want to know this. What happened, coming from the mouth of Joran .......

Q: So there's no responsebility for Peter R de Vries?
The question is: who caused the shock damage?
And then you have to take a step back, and say it's the one who's responsible for the show.

B: No, of course not, the shock damage has been caused because of the fact that, and I believe that, that you have to take the confession very serious, and the shock damage has happened because of what the man said he did, he said it himself.
So you can't say: The messenger has caused the shock damage, No it's Mr vd Sloot of course. Because of his actions and what he left behind.

Q: All the confession, let's call them what you call them, all the facts has been checked and they were not happy on Aruba, the boy has not been found, the boat has not been found.

B: That's true what you are saying now, but what you see often in a lawsuit is that a judge will believe a witness even though it's been proven that he lied.
So to judge to believe the witness is not the point, if you can believe him, or catch him in a lie, the judge can think: I can trust him, it makes sense what he says, or a suspect who lies, you can disconnect the two.

Q: Believability is in question, how can you bring the believability in front of a judge?

B: First of all don't forget the criminal case is still ongoing on Aruba, also my client has given me the orders, that as soon as Aruba makes the decision to not prosecute, we're going to MAKEN EEN KLACHT BY HET HOF. (Twitty, even though if the case gets dropped she's going to complain to the court on Aruba)

Lets look again at Mrs. Twitty, what she thought was the most difficult for her to watch during the show.

(Beth on tape)
When he imitated her when she's having a seizure, or is suffering or whatever, that's when......I mean............that's the part that's the most difficult for me to watch, that's this the day, or today .......I just said: I want to come through the Tv and I just want to kill him right there, I mean now I know the answer to what happened to Natalee, and I don't have to constanlty have to spearhead and manage and gosh you know I mean it's just like it's finaly put to rest I guess,

Q: Are you being motivated because of this reason or is it a client that.....?

B: No, I have to tell you that I am more motivated in this case because I can put myself in this woman shoes.

If the case is dropped I can myself bring a complain (by the courts).

Q: When are you yourself sure of the case, When are you going to start?

B: I told my client I will tell her within two weeks.


Here Peaches..


Hi Tot,

I have not heard of this either.  Maybe our new Dutch friends can help us to understand this type of civil suit.
I do hope Bram seriously believes he can win this for Beth, otherwise why even mention it?

BTW, do you have the link to that zorpia site mentioned in earlier thread.  Not had a chance to look into it.

Also, back in Feb. Art Wood was on Dana's show and he said he found the Gottenbos boat and gave that 411 to Mos.  Any updates on that?

j4n!!

I am not an attorney, in the US or Holland, but I think it goes like this. If the prosecutor decides to not prosecute a case, and formally drops the case, then the victim can hire an attorney and prosecute the case themself. They get the complete file.


Thankyou PE,
   Wow!Wow!Wow! Getting the complete file would be great if they had one eh? Seem's things go missing in Aruba.People,evidence,etc...If it happened in Aruba,it would be in front of the same judges,right?

suisse71 ,
  I don't know a thing about the Zorpia site or that boat..Sorry..I'm sure someone else here could find it for you though...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 11, 2008, 04:28:32 PM
Private Eye - yes, Janet explained it very well in a couple posts in response to Tot's original post:

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2689.msg363689#msg363689


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Ree on March 11, 2008, 04:31:16 PM
Posted by Marco at RU:

03-05-08 P&W Bram Moszkowics on the show, De Vries or Joran?

Quote from: marco
De Vries or Joran, who's responsible?

Q: Good now were' going to talk about Beth Twitty, Bram Moszkowics, you have contact with her, she's in Holland now to investigate with you if Joran vd Sloot can be juridisch , is it only about Joran or also other family members"

B: At the moment we're only concentrating on Mr. Joran vd Sloot.

Q: How did you get in contact with Mrs. Twitty?

B: Today or yesterday?

Q: No no, back then....Did you contact her?

B: No, that's a misconception, I never call people and ask them if they want to be my client.
I was called by a middleman, she then called me and asked me if I want to represent her, in the beginning she has asked around how she can find someone.

Q: And in the end, somehow she came in contact with you?

B: Yes, that's how it goes.

Q: Does she have an American lawyer?

B: Yes, there was talk about that.......but that's been blown away.

Q: Which judicial system is going to deal with Joran?

B: Either in Holland or Aruba. But that's the same.

Q: Why not in America? Is that not the country of the "claim culture"?

B: That I don't know for sure, I have still not talked to her American Lawyer, but I think that it has to do with the fact where all these awful things happened, and the law enforcement.

Q: We asked Mrs.Twitty what her motivation is, at you office, and this is what she said:

(Beth talking on tape):
We have to hope that the judicial system will kick in and that he will be prosecuted and put behind bars, but you know,  but if that does not happen, you know, we're looking at a civil action, I mean it's too late for Natalee and for us, but it's not too late for other young females that might be in his path.

Q: Lets talk about the different paths you might take. How big of a change, what's the percentage, that you can win, do you have if you begin the procedure?

B: If I confine myself with the civil procedure, I think a 85 - 90% chance that I will do it, but you have to be careful, you understand that also, look this lady can not take much more, so at the moment that you start investigating, as a lawyer you have to be sure, that there is a realistic change is,more than that, that it will succeed, because what's worse for her, if I start a civil case, and Mr. vd Sloot will win, we don't want that.

Q: So a civil case, we're talking about money........

B: No, it's not about money, this woman....................has.....................a civil case, it's that.......I will represent my client and .........we will take legal civil action, not criminal but a civil action.......against vd Sloot.
That means that I am investigating, with other people around me, also on Aruba, if it makes sense that we sue the man for an unlawful act.
Unlawful act, that means  that you did something that in society you should not have been done.
There are two anchors then, I will throw those out, one what we call "shock damage", it's a form of damage, if you experienced something terrible word speaks for itself, and if you have psychological damage, my client has that also, you can demand "shock damage".
That's one way, the other possibility I am looking at, which is also interesting,  is also based on an unlawful act,  if you take someone civil lawful, keep in mind that the man made a confession, because for me there's no question in my mind, that he made the confession a whole lot of different times in that car, and because he kept silent all this time, he committed an unlawful act against my client, because, as an example, my client has been pointed out as a material suspect, and because of this she's suffering.

Q: Because now she's a suspect herself in the disappearance of her daughter?

B: Yes! Just to say something.

Q: But how can Joran vd Sloot help this?

B: Can help what?

Q: How can Joran vd Sloot help, is it his fault that Mrs Twitty has been a suspect herself, for a little while at least?

B: Well that I can tell you, it's because he consistently has denied, until the moment he did confess, has it been possible that the eyes have been pointed towards my client......

Q: But it's his right, loose from the fact IF he did it, it is your right as a suspect, to say you are innocent.

B: That's why I am talking about a civil action with you, than he does not have the right to deny the charges.

Q: That's the difference, that's what you're talking about?

B: Well, in the civil........well lets say in the criminal case the man is a suspect he can keep still, in the civil case, because he's not talking, he has caused her (Mrs Twitty) damage. So here the obligation to keep quiet does not apply here.

Q: And does that only work if can start from the point......if the judge....that  the confessions that he made in the car to Patrick  v d Eem the right confessions are

B: Well look the whole premises, and there will stand or fall the whole case with, how do you appreciate the confession, what Joran said in the car, I, myself have no doubt about that, you can argue about that, I have colleagues they do not agree with me at all, they don't see a confession what so ever, I find that ridiculous,

That was Gerard Sprong, or Mrs Riet (?)

B: I'm not sure, but you can not persevere with dry eyes that vd Sloot 5 times in the car, yes shark, no shark,  he never took one word back, not the day after he had said it, that he never confessed, that's just nonsense.
Whatever this guy has said in the car, that's going to make an impression on the judge.

Q: Shock effect, I want to.......shock effect, damage, what's the shock?

B: That she, my client physiologically has been GEDEKOMPSEERD (I can't translate that word)     (HELP PLEASE)
and she now seeing a psychologist.......

Q: And then how can you say: That's because of you, Joran?

B: Well do you have someone else in mind? You have to connect the dots, and that's what my team and I are investigating right now, to begin with, how did she get "the shock"that can be diagnosed by a psychiatrist, that she's suffering,, I think that's possible, there's a connection, you don't have to be an Einstein to make the connection between the misery this woman has now, and the fact that her daughter has disappeared.

Q: That has to do with the fact, well the confession from Joran in Patric's car, and that's one of the things that will be seen as a confession......

B: That's very important .....

Q: because there is the suggestion that one of the things......this boy is a pathological liar, he just makes stuff up, 

B: I know that, I have heard that, but that's nonsense, because the man has never been investigated by a judge, leave alone a psychiatrist, that people are now screaming that he now, let's say, a habitual liar is, you can't take that serious.

Q: But then, how is it possible, you yourself say: it's a confession, but you can't take it serious, how is it possible then that this boy is still walking around free?

B: It's a very good question, and why that is, is because ....what was said after the De Vries's show?
We do not have enough to rearrest him, I find that remarkable, because if, in the past you had enough to lock him up, what they did on Aruba, WITHOUT  the confession, then I ask myself: What more do you want if they have what they had then, they said them self it's enough to lock him up, then you get a fantastic TV show, where they show the man made 5 confessions, that he said he did it, I think then if you count 1 + 1, that also on Aruba that's 2,

Q: But I think the judge-COMMESARIS, who back then questioned Joran vd Sloot, he came to the conclusion that Joran a big fat liar is, so you can't classify the confession in a car with a lot of camera's as a confession.

B: The  judge-COMMESARIS, should not hide behind that, because if that's the fact because that's not his job, he has to determine if there's enough evidence to pick the man up again, and the same judge found there was enough to pick him up without the confession, that's important what I say now, now he's saying that with the confession there's NOT enough evidence to pick him up again.
Now it's your turn again.......... ha ha

Q: My turn, but you can also say that the "shock damage" that Mrs. Twitty has now, is not because of Joran vd Sloot but De Vries.

B: That's a different question....

Q: It might be a different question, but it's an important one.

B: Look, at the moment my client knows what Peter de Vries got from this man, is it above being a human for he to not look at it, I think, you can't set that  after what she heard from Peter de Vries, you can't say: I don't have to see this.
She wants to know this, I think as a mother, you want to know this. What happened, coming from the mouth of Joran .......

Q: So there's no responsebility for Peter R de Vries?
The question is: who caused the shock damage?
And then you have to take a step back, and say it's the one who's responsible for the show.

B: No, of course not, the shock damage has been caused because of the fact that, and I believe that, that you have to take the confession very serious, and the shock damage has happened because of what the man said he did, he said it himself.
So you can't say: The messenger has caused the shock damage, No it's Mr vd Sloot of course. Because of his actions and what he left behind.

Q: All the confession, let's call them what you call them, all the facts has been checked and they were not happy on Aruba, the boy has not been found, the boat has not been found.

B: That's true what you are saying now, but what you see often in a lawsuit is that a judge will believe a witness even though it's been proven that he lied.
So to judge to believe the witness is not the point, if you can believe him, or catch him in a lie, the judge can think: I can trust him, it makes sense what he says, or a suspect who lies, you can disconnect the two.

Q: Believability is in question, how can you bring the believability in front of a judge?

B: First of all don't forget the criminal case is still ongoing on Aruba, also my client has given me the orders, that as soon as Aruba makes the decision to not prosecute, we're going to MAKEN EEN KLACHT BY HET HOF. (Twitty, even though if the case gets dropped she's going to complain to the court on Aruba)

Lets look again at Mrs. Twitty, what she thought was the most difficult for her to watch during the show.

(Beth on tape)
When he imitated her when she's having a seizure, or is suffering or whatever, that's when......I mean............that's the part that's the most difficult for me to watch, that's this the day, or today .......I just said: I want to come through the Tv and I just want to kill him right there, I mean now I know the answer to what happened to Natalee, and I don't have to constanlty have to spearhead and manage and gosh you know I mean it's just like it's finaly put to rest I guess,

Q: Are you being motivated because of this reason or is it a client that.....?

B: No, I have to tell you that I am more motivated in this case because I can put myself in this woman shoes.

If the case is dropped I can myself bring a complain (by the courts).

Q: When are you yourself sure of the case, When are you going to start?

B: I told my client I will tell her within two weeks.


Here Peaches..


Hi Tot,

I have not heard of this either.  Maybe our new Dutch friends can help us to understand this type of civil suit.
I do hope Bram seriously believes he can win this for Beth, otherwise why even mention it?

BTW, do you have the link to that zorpia site mentioned in earlier thread.  Not had a chance to look into it.

Also, back in Feb. Art Wood was on Dana's show and he said he found the Gottenbos boat and gave that 411 to Mos.  Any updates on that?

j4n!!

Sorry Tot.  I'm not ignoring, just working (or trying to pretend to at least).  It's my understanding that if the prosecutor fails to bring charges, the victem can file an appeal to the court to try and have that decision overruled.  I don't know if it's ever done and if so, how successful it is.  I would imagine it works well in Holland, but in a corrupt environment like Aruba, I doubt it's very useful.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Tater on March 11, 2008, 04:31:34 PM
Hi Monkey's,
  Just got caught up reading.Watched the video link and listened to Dave and Beth.Seem's Dave thinks it all went down at the Sloots house..Bless his heart and Beth's heart too..One thing I've always wondered about and that is why Dave had to find out from his son that Natalee was missing.I wonder why Beth or Jug didn't call him immediatly..I don't know,just sad...
And you are trying to do what with your question.  Read the books.  Good try.  Not working.     Jack blue


You're way out of line jackb..It was a fair question and it's one that's asked by many people that don't care to go out and buy books to get the answer.This question was answered very nicely which you would have seen had you of scrolled down to see.Do not ever and I mean ever accuse me of anything,especially the act of manipulation.That is an evil accusation and I do not appreciate it one bit.When your pointing your finger at someone else,you've got three pointing right back at you.You might want to remember that!Like I said,it was a fair question and a fair answer followed..God Bless

This is the second time in the last week or so that I have seen this very same question, almost word for word, so it must be on everyone's mind. What was the fair answer and did it get answered fairly both times? I missed both answers but I definetly remember the question. Just curious.

I only asked it once and was told that Beth told her son to call Dave.I thought it to be a simple and well rounded answer. It seem's like a fair answer to me.I don't know about another question and answer and if there was one,I missed it...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Ree on March 11, 2008, 04:38:34 PM
Anna - my guess is Beth being called a suspect comes from the Kelly & Young and Renee Gielen documetary (I could be wrong).

Too bad Beth can't include all the Fobbers in the suit.  After all they started the accusations without any of the evidence that they demanded to believe in Joran's guilt.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Tater on March 11, 2008, 04:38:52 PM
Posted by Marco at RU:

03-05-08 P&W Bram Moszkowics on the show, De Vries or Joran?

Quote from: marco
De Vries or Joran, who's responsible?

Q: Good now were' going to talk about Beth Twitty, Bram Moszkowics, you have contact with her, she's in Holland now to investigate with you if Joran vd Sloot can be juridisch , is it only about Joran or also other family members"

B: At the moment we're only concentrating on Mr. Joran vd Sloot.

Q: How did you get in contact with Mrs. Twitty?

B: Today or yesterday?

Q: No no, back then....Did you contact her?

B: No, that's a misconception, I never call people and ask them if they want to be my client.
I was called by a middleman, she then called me and asked me if I want to represent her, in the beginning she has asked around how she can find someone.

Q: And in the end, somehow she came in contact with you?

B: Yes, that's how it goes.

Q: Does she have an American lawyer?

B: Yes, there was talk about that.......but that's been blown away.

Q: Which judicial system is going to deal with Joran?

B: Either in Holland or Aruba. But that's the same.

Q: Why not in America? Is that not the country of the "claim culture"?

B: That I don't know for sure, I have still not talked to her American Lawyer, but I think that it has to do with the fact where all these awful things happened, and the law enforcement.

Q: We asked Mrs.Twitty what her motivation is, at you office, and this is what she said:

(Beth talking on tape):
We have to hope that the judicial system will kick in and that he will be prosecuted and put behind bars, but you know,  but if that does not happen, you know, we're looking at a civil action, I mean it's too late for Natalee and for us, but it's not too late for other young females that might be in his path.

Q: Lets talk about the different paths you might take. How big of a change, what's the percentage, that you can win, do you have if you begin the procedure?

B: If I confine myself with the civil procedure, I think a 85 - 90% chance that I will do it, but you have to be careful, you understand that also, look this lady can not take much more, so at the moment that you start investigating, as a lawyer you have to be sure, that there is a realistic change is,more than that, that it will succeed, because what's worse for her, if I start a civil case, and Mr. vd Sloot will win, we don't want that.

Q: So a civil case, we're talking about money........

B: No, it's not about money, this woman....................has.....................a civil case, it's that.......I will represent my client and .........we will take legal civil action, not criminal but a civil action.......against vd Sloot.
That means that I am investigating, with other people around me, also on Aruba, if it makes sense that we sue the man for an unlawful act.
Unlawful act, that means  that you did something that in society you should not have been done.
There are two anchors then, I will throw those out, one what we call "shock damage", it's a form of damage, if you experienced something terrible word speaks for itself, and if you have psychological damage, my client has that also, you can demand "shock damage".
That's one way, the other possibility I am looking at, which is also interesting,  is also based on an unlawful act,  if you take someone civil lawful, keep in mind that the man made a confession, because for me there's no question in my mind, that he made the confession a whole lot of different times in that car, and because he kept silent all this time, he committed an unlawful act against my client, because, as an example, my client has been pointed out as a material suspect, and because of this she's suffering.

Q: Because now she's a suspect herself in the disappearance of her daughter?

B: Yes! Just to say something.

Q: But how can Joran vd Sloot help this?

B: Can help what?

Q: How can Joran vd Sloot help, is it his fault that Mrs Twitty has been a suspect herself, for a little while at least?

B: Well that I can tell you, it's because he consistently has denied, until the moment he did confess, has it been possible that the eyes have been pointed towards my client......

Q: But it's his right, loose from the fact IF he did it, it is your right as a suspect, to say you are innocent.

B: That's why I am talking about a civil action with you, than he does not have the right to deny the charges.

Q: That's the difference, that's what you're talking about?

B: Well, in the civil........well lets say in the criminal case the man is a suspect he can keep still, in the civil case, because he's not talking, he has caused her (Mrs Twitty) damage. So here the obligation to keep quiet does not apply here.

Q: And does that only work if can start from the point......if the judge....that  the confessions that he made in the car to Patrick  v d Eem the right confessions are

B: Well look the whole premises, and there will stand or fall the whole case with, how do you appreciate the confession, what Joran said in the car, I, myself have no doubt about that, you can argue about that, I have colleagues they do not agree with me at all, they don't see a confession what so ever, I find that ridiculous,

That was Gerard Sprong, or Mrs Riet (?)

B: I'm not sure, but you can not persevere with dry eyes that vd Sloot 5 times in the car, yes shark, no shark,  he never took one word back, not the day after he had said it, that he never confessed, that's just nonsense.
Whatever this guy has said in the car, that's going to make an impression on the judge.

Q: Shock effect, I want to.......shock effect, damage, what's the shock?

B: That she, my client physiologically has been GEDEKOMPSEERD (I can't translate that word)     (HELP PLEASE)
and she now seeing a psychologist.......

Q: And then how can you say: That's because of you, Joran?

B: Well do you have someone else in mind? You have to connect the dots, and that's what my team and I are investigating right now, to begin with, how did she get "the shock"that can be diagnosed by a psychiatrist, that she's suffering,, I think that's possible, there's a connection, you don't have to be an Einstein to make the connection between the misery this woman has now, and the fact that her daughter has disappeared.

Q: That has to do with the fact, well the confession from Joran in Patric's car, and that's one of the things that will be seen as a confession......

B: That's very important .....

Q: because there is the suggestion that one of the things......this boy is a pathological liar, he just makes stuff up, 

B: I know that, I have heard that, but that's nonsense, because the man has never been investigated by a judge, leave alone a psychiatrist, that people are now screaming that he now, let's say, a habitual liar is, you can't take that serious.

Q: But then, how is it possible, you yourself say: it's a confession, but you can't take it serious, how is it possible then that this boy is still walking around free?

B: It's a very good question, and why that is, is because ....what was said after the De Vries's show?
We do not have enough to rearrest him, I find that remarkable, because if, in the past you had enough to lock him up, what they did on Aruba, WITHOUT  the confession, then I ask myself: What more do you want if they have what they had then, they said them self it's enough to lock him up, then you get a fantastic TV show, where they show the man made 5 confessions, that he said he did it, I think then if you count 1 + 1, that also on Aruba that's 2,

Q: But I think the judge-COMMESARIS, who back then questioned Joran vd Sloot, he came to the conclusion that Joran a big fat liar is, so you can't classify the confession in a car with a lot of camera's as a confession.

B: The  judge-COMMESARIS, should not hide behind that, because if that's the fact because that's not his job, he has to determine if there's enough evidence to pick the man up again, and the same judge found there was enough to pick him up without the confession, that's important what I say now, now he's saying that with the confession there's NOT enough evidence to pick him up again.
Now it's your turn again.......... ha ha

Q: My turn, but you can also say that the "shock damage" that Mrs. Twitty has now, is not because of Joran vd Sloot but De Vries.

B: That's a different question....

Q: It might be a different question, but it's an important one.

B: Look, at the moment my client knows what Peter de Vries got from this man, is it above being a human for he to not look at it, I think, you can't set that  after what she heard from Peter de Vries, you can't say: I don't have to see this.
She wants to know this, I think as a mother, you want to know this. What happened, coming from the mouth of Joran .......

Q: So there's no responsebility for Peter R de Vries?
The question is: who caused the shock damage?
And then you have to take a step back, and say it's the one who's responsible for the show.

B: No, of course not, the shock damage has been caused because of the fact that, and I believe that, that you have to take the confession very serious, and the shock damage has happened because of what the man said he did, he said it himself.
So you can't say: The messenger has caused the shock damage, No it's Mr vd Sloot of course. Because of his actions and what he left behind.

Q: All the confession, let's call them what you call them, all the facts has been checked and they were not happy on Aruba, the boy has not been found, the boat has not been found.

B: That's true what you are saying now, but what you see often in a lawsuit is that a judge will believe a witness even though it's been proven that he lied.
So to judge to believe the witness is not the point, if you can believe him, or catch him in a lie, the judge can think: I can trust him, it makes sense what he says, or a suspect who lies, you can disconnect the two.

Q: Believability is in question, how can you bring the believability in front of a judge?

B: First of all don't forget the criminal case is still ongoing on Aruba, also my client has given me the orders, that as soon as Aruba makes the decision to not prosecute, we're going to MAKEN EEN KLACHT BY HET HOF. (Twitty, even though if the case gets dropped she's going to complain to the court on Aruba)

Lets look again at Mrs. Twitty, what she thought was the most difficult for her to watch during the show.

(Beth on tape)
When he imitated her when she's having a seizure, or is suffering or whatever, that's when......I mean............that's the part that's the most difficult for me to watch, that's this the day, or today .......I just said: I want to come through the Tv and I just want to kill him right there, I mean now I know the answer to what happened to Natalee, and I don't have to constanlty have to spearhead and manage and gosh you know I mean it's just like it's finaly put to rest I guess,

Q: Are you being motivated because of this reason or is it a client that.....?

B: No, I have to tell you that I am more motivated in this case because I can put myself in this woman shoes.

If the case is dropped I can myself bring a complain (by the courts).

Q: When are you yourself sure of the case, When are you going to start?

B: I told my client I will tell her within two weeks.


Here Peaches..


Hi Tot,

I have not heard of this either.  Maybe our new Dutch friends can help us to understand this type of civil suit.
I do hope Bram seriously believes he can win this for Beth, otherwise why even mention it?

BTW, do you have the link to that zorpia site mentioned in earlier thread.  Not had a chance to look into it.

Also, back in Feb. Art Wood was on Dana's show and he said he found the Gottenbos boat and gave that 411 to Mos.  Any updates on that?

j4n!!

Sorry Tot.  I'm not ignoring, just working (or trying to pretend to at least).  It's my understanding that if the prosecutor fails to bring charges, the victem can file an appeal to the court to try and have that decision overruled.  I don't know if it's ever done and if so, how successful it is.  I would imagine it works well in Holland, but in a corrupt environment like Aruba, I doubt it's very useful.

Hi Ree,
   Thankyou for answering..:) I do believe you're right about corrupt Aruba and doubt too that it would be useful..:(


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: private eye on March 11, 2008, 04:41:06 PM
Private Eye - yes, Janet explained it very well in a couple posts in response to Tot's original post:

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2689.msg363689#msg363689

The whole situation is sad, but personally I think Beth and Dave have worked together better than 98% of all other people similiar situated. When it has counted they have both been there for each other, supporting each other. I would hate for either of them to start questioning their response to this, their behavior as parents, or their treatment of each other. They did and are doing a great job.They still have a child alive that needs them to function as parents who both financially and emotionally contribute to Matts life and to support him while he is in college, and it takes BOTH parents to support a child in college today.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: suisse71 on March 11, 2008, 04:42:42 PM
Posted by Marco at RU:

03-05-08 P&W Bram Moszkowics on the show, De Vries or Joran?

Quote from: marco
De Vries or Joran, who's responsible?

Q: Good now were' going to talk about Beth Twitty, Bram Moszkowics, you have contact with her, she's in Holland now to investigate with you if Joran vd Sloot can be juridisch , is it only about Joran or also other family members"

B: At the moment we're only concentrating on Mr. Joran vd Sloot.

Q: How did you get in contact with Mrs. Twitty?

B: Today or yesterday?

Q: No no, back then....Did you contact her?

B: No, that's a misconception, I never call people and ask them if they want to be my client.
I was called by a middleman, she then called me and asked me if I want to represent her, in the beginning she has asked around how she can find someone.

Q: And in the end, somehow she came in contact with you?

B: Yes, that's how it goes.

Q: Does she have an American lawyer?

B: Yes, there was talk about that.......but that's been blown away.

Q: Which judicial system is going to deal with Joran?

B: Either in Holland or Aruba. But that's the same.

Q: Why not in America? Is that not the country of the "claim culture"?

B: That I don't know for sure, I have still not talked to her American Lawyer, but I think that it has to do with the fact where all these awful things happened, and the law enforcement.

Q: We asked Mrs.Twitty what her motivation is, at you office, and this is what she said:

(Beth talking on tape):
We have to hope that the judicial system will kick in and that he will be prosecuted and put behind bars, but you know,  but if that does not happen, you know, we're looking at a civil action, I mean it's too late for Natalee and for us, but it's not too late for other young females that might be in his path.

Q: Lets talk about the different paths you might take. How big of a change, what's the percentage, that you can win, do you have if you begin the procedure?

B: If I confine myself with the civil procedure, I think a 85 - 90% chance that I will do it, but you have to be careful, you understand that also, look this lady can not take much more, so at the moment that you start investigating, as a lawyer you have to be sure, that there is a realistic change is,more than that, that it will succeed, because what's worse for her, if I start a civil case, and Mr. vd Sloot will win, we don't want that.

Q: So a civil case, we're talking about money........

B: No, it's not about money, this woman....................has.....................a civil case, it's that.......I will represent my client and .........we will take legal civil action, not criminal but a civil action.......against vd Sloot.
That means that I am investigating, with other people around me, also on Aruba, if it makes sense that we sue the man for an unlawful act.
Unlawful act, that means  that you did something that in society you should not have been done.
There are two anchors then, I will throw those out, one what we call "shock damage", it's a form of damage, if you experienced something terrible word speaks for itself, and if you have psychological damage, my client has that also, you can demand "shock damage".
That's one way, the other possibility I am looking at, which is also interesting,  is also based on an unlawful act,  if you take someone civil lawful, keep in mind that the man made a confession, because for me there's no question in my mind, that he made the confession a whole lot of different times in that car, and because he kept silent all this time, he committed an unlawful act against my client, because, as an example, my client has been pointed out as a material suspect, and because of this she's suffering.

Q: Because now she's a suspect herself in the disappearance of her daughter?

B: Yes! Just to say something.

Q: But how can Joran vd Sloot help this?

B: Can help what?

Q: How can Joran vd Sloot help, is it his fault that Mrs Twitty has been a suspect herself, for a little while at least?

B: Well that I can tell you, it's because he consistently has denied, until the moment he did confess, has it been possible that the eyes have been pointed towards my client......

Q: But it's his right, loose from the fact IF he did it, it is your right as a suspect, to say you are innocent.

B: That's why I am talking about a civil action with you, than he does not have the right to deny the charges.

Q: That's the difference, that's what you're talking about?

B: Well, in the civil........well lets say in the criminal case the man is a suspect he can keep still, in the civil case, because he's not talking, he has caused her (Mrs Twitty) damage. So here the obligation to keep quiet does not apply here.

Q: And does that only work if can start from the point......if the judge....that  the confessions that he made in the car to Patrick  v d Eem the right confessions are

B: Well look the whole premises, and there will stand or fall the whole case with, how do you appreciate the confession, what Joran said in the car, I, myself have no doubt about that, you can argue about that, I have colleagues they do not agree with me at all, they don't see a confession what so ever, I find that ridiculous,

That was Gerard Sprong, or Mrs Riet (?)

B: I'm not sure, but you can not persevere with dry eyes that vd Sloot 5 times in the car, yes shark, no shark,  he never took one word back, not the day after he had said it, that he never confessed, that's just nonsense.
Whatever this guy has said in the car, that's going to make an impression on the judge.

Q: Shock effect, I want to.......shock effect, damage, what's the shock?

B: That she, my client physiologically has been GEDEKOMPSEERD (I can't translate that word)     (HELP PLEASE)
and she now seeing a psychologist.......

Q: And then how can you say: That's because of you, Joran?

B: Well do you have someone else in mind? You have to connect the dots, and that's what my team and I are investigating right now, to begin with, how did she get "the shock"that can be diagnosed by a psychiatrist, that she's suffering,, I think that's possible, there's a connection, you don't have to be an Einstein to make the connection between the misery this woman has now, and the fact that her daughter has disappeared.

Q: That has to do with the fact, well the confession from Joran in Patric's car, and that's one of the things that will be seen as a confession......

B: That's very important .....

Q: because there is the suggestion that one of the things......this boy is a pathological liar, he just makes stuff up, 

B: I know that, I have heard that, but that's nonsense, because the man has never been investigated by a judge, leave alone a psychiatrist, that people are now screaming that he now, let's say, a habitual liar is, you can't take that serious.

Q: But then, how is it possible, you yourself say: it's a confession, but you can't take it serious, how is it possible then that this boy is still walking around free?

B: It's a very good question, and why that is, is because ....what was said after the De Vries's show?
We do not have enough to rearrest him, I find that remarkable, because if, in the past you had enough to lock him up, what they did on Aruba, WITHOUT  the confession, then I ask myself: What more do you want if they have what they had then, they said them self it's enough to lock him up, then you get a fantastic TV show, where they show the man made 5 confessions, that he said he did it, I think then if you count 1 + 1, that also on Aruba that's 2,

Q: But I think the judge-COMMESARIS, who back then questioned Joran vd Sloot, he came to the conclusion that Joran a big fat liar is, so you can't classify the confession in a car with a lot of camera's as a confession.

B: The  judge-COMMESARIS, should not hide behind that, because if that's the fact because that's not his job, he has to determine if there's enough evidence to pick the man up again, and the same judge found there was enough to pick him up without the confession, that's important what I say now, now he's saying that with the confession there's NOT enough evidence to pick him up again.
Now it's your turn again.......... ha ha

Q: My turn, but you can also say that the "shock damage" that Mrs. Twitty has now, is not because of Joran vd Sloot but De Vries.

B: That's a different question....

Q: It might be a different question, but it's an important one.

B: Look, at the moment my client knows what Peter de Vries got from this man, is it above being a human for he to not look at it, I think, you can't set that  after what she heard from Peter de Vries, you can't say: I don't have to see this.
She wants to know this, I think as a mother, you want to know this. What happened, coming from the mouth of Joran .......

Q: So there's no responsebility for Peter R de Vries?
The question is: who caused the shock damage?
And then you have to take a step back, and say it's the one who's responsible for the show.

B: No, of course not, the shock damage has been caused because of the fact that, and I believe that, that you have to take the confession very serious, and the shock damage has happened because of what the man said he did, he said it himself.
So you can't say: The messenger has caused the shock damage, No it's Mr vd Sloot of course. Because of his actions and what he left behind.

Q: All the confession, let's call them what you call them, all the facts has been checked and they were not happy on Aruba, the boy has not been found, the boat has not been found.

B: That's true what you are saying now, but what you see often in a lawsuit is that a judge will believe a witness even though it's been proven that he lied.
So to judge to believe the witness is not the point, if you can believe him, or catch him in a lie, the judge can think: I can trust him, it makes sense what he says, or a suspect who lies, you can disconnect the two.

Q: Believability is in question, how can you bring the believability in front of a judge?

B: First of all don't forget the criminal case is still ongoing on Aruba, also my client has given me the orders, that as soon as Aruba makes the decision to not prosecute, we're going to MAKEN EEN KLACHT BY HET HOF. (Twitty, even though if the case gets dropped she's going to complain to the court on Aruba)

Lets look again at Mrs. Twitty, what she thought was the most difficult for her to watch during the show.

(Beth on tape)
When he imitated her when she's having a seizure, or is suffering or whatever, that's when......I mean............that's the part that's the most difficult for me to watch, that's this the day, or today .......I just said: I want to come through the Tv and I just want to kill him right there, I mean now I know the answer to what happened to Natalee, and I don't have to constanlty have to spearhead and manage and gosh you know I mean it's just like it's finaly put to rest I guess,

Q: Are you being motivated because of this reason or is it a client that.....?

B: No, I have to tell you that I am more motivated in this case because I can put myself in this woman shoes.

If the case is dropped I can myself bring a complain (by the courts).

Q: When are you yourself sure of the case, When are you going to start?

B: I told my client I will tell her within two weeks.


Here Peaches..


Hi Tot,

I have not heard of this either.  Maybe our new Dutch friends can help us to understand this type of civil suit.
I do hope Bram seriously believes he can win this for Beth, otherwise why even mention it?

BTW, do you have the link to that zorpia site mentioned in earlier thread.  Not had a chance to look into it.

Also, back in Feb. Art Wood was on Dana's show and he said he found the Gottenbos boat and gave that 411 to Mos.  Any updates on that?

j4n!!

I am not an attorney, in the US or Holland, but I think it goes like this. If the prosecutor decides to not prosecute a case, and formally drops the case, then the victim can hire an attorney and prosecute the case themself. They get the complete file.


Thankyou PE,
   Wow!Wow!Wow! Getting the complete file would be great if they had one eh? Seem's things go missing in Aruba.People,evidence,etc...If it happened in Aruba,it would be in front of the same judges,right?

suisse71 ,
  I don't know a thing about the Zorpia site or that boat..Sorry..I'm sure someone else here could find it for you though...


Thanks PE!

The complete file.  Doesn't John Q Kelly have that, and we know it is incomplete - ie Joran's statement from May 31, 05 etc. 

Thanks Tot!

Probably CAPS may know the lastest on Gottenbos boat and other  follow up questions.

BTW everyone did such a great job @ St. Louis travel show - Bravo!!!  It speaks miles that the Aruba booth at every travel show is empty. 

j4n!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 11, 2008, 04:42:47 PM
Anna - my guess is Beth being called a suspect comes from the Kelly & Young and Renee Gielen documetary (I could be wrong).

Too bad Beth can't include all the Fobbers in the suit.  After all they started the accusations without any of the evidence that they demanded to believe in Joran's guilt.

Not sure about the Fobber's but I'm sure Kelly/Young/Gielen could be on her list  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Tater on March 11, 2008, 04:47:47 PM
Private Eye - yes, Janet explained it very well in a couple posts in response to Tot's original post:

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2689.msg363689#msg363689

The whole situation is sad, but personally I think Beth and Dave have worked together better than 98% of all other people similiar situated. When it has counted they have both been there for each other, supporting each other. I would hate for either of them to start questioning their response to this, their behavior as parents, or their treatment of each other. They did and are doing a great job.They still have a child alive that needs them to function as parents who both financially and emotionally contribute to Matts life and to support him while he is in college, and it takes BOTH parents to support a child in college today.


Very well said PE and I agree with you 100 percent..They both love Natalee the same and I believe that alone outweighs anything else...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: katrien on March 11, 2008, 04:48:42 PM
I listened to the interview.

Moszkowicz said article 12.

He means this:

Quote
Laatste artikelen: 12 Sv
Wetboek van Strafvordering (Sv)

Artikel 12 | Sv, Boek 1, Titel 1, Afdeling 4
   
1.
    Wordt een strafbaar feit niet vervolgd of de vervolging niet voortgezet, dan kan de rechtstreeks belanghebbende daarover schriftelijk beklag doen bij het gerechtshof, binnen het rechtsgebied waarvan de beslissing tot niet vervolging of niet verdere vervolging is genomen. Indien de beslissing tot niet vervolging is genomen door de officier van justitie bij het landelijk parket, is bevoegd het gerechtshof te 's-Gravenhage.


By the way, I have my doubts whether the interview is reproduced very complete and correct.
Moszkowicz said that the one who courses the shock is the one who did the confession.

I don't have time to listen to it carefully at the moment.

One thing I noticed was that Moszkowicz mentioned the Hof (article 12).

Note: The European Hof is probably the last possibility.







Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: bleachedblack on March 11, 2008, 04:48:54 PM
Private Eye - yes, Janet explained it very well in a couple posts in response to Tot's original post:

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2689.msg363689#msg363689

The whole situation is sad, but personally I think Beth and Dave have worked together better than 98% of all other people similiar situated. When it has counted they have both been there for each other, supporting each other. I would hate for either of them to start questioning their response to this, their behavior as parents, or their treatment of each other. They did and are doing a great job.They still have a child alive that needs them to function as parents who both financially and emotionally contribute to Matts life and to support him while he is in college, and it takes BOTH parents to support a child in college today.

Excellent post PE. How true.......It serves no purpose to second guess at this time why a mother in a state of understandable emotional distress choose to make a particular call.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Tater on March 11, 2008, 04:59:45 PM
Does anyone think the insinuation of attorney Bram Moszkowicz into this mix will possibly cause the big documentary expose by Renee Geilen to be cancelled faster than appearances on that other program from TeleAruba with Host Castro by any chance?

I think there is a very good possibility that they may think twice now about what they say if they know they can be held accountable.  Bram does seem to have quite a rep in this regard.


Off to the ole working and lurking. . . . .

Bram hasn't agreed to take the case yet right? I would imagine that it's all in limbo so to speak.Sounds plausible to me though that they would cancel..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: mojo on March 11, 2008, 05:05:25 PM
Does anyone think the insinuation of attorney Bram Moszkowicz into this mix will possibly cause the big documentary expose by Renee Geilen to be cancelled faster than appearances on that other program from TeleAruba with Host Castro by any chance?

I think there is a very good possibility that they may think twice now about what they say if they know they can be held accountable.  Bram does seem to have quite a rep in this regard.


Off to the ole working and lurking. . . . .

Bram hasn't agreed to take the case yet right? I would imagine that it's all in limbo so to speak.Sounds plausible to me though that they would cancel..

sounds to me as though he wants to be pretty sure he can win, he doesn't want to get beth's hopes up and then another disappointment. he said as much.

also anna, sounds as if the complaint would be against the aruban court for failure to proceed -- some sort of misconduct or malfeasance??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: private eye on March 11, 2008, 05:09:51 PM
Private Eye - yes, Janet explained it very well in a couple posts in response to Tot's original post:

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2689.msg363689#msg363689

The whole situation is sad, but personally I think Beth and Dave have worked together better than 98% of all other people similiar situated. When it has counted they have both been there for each other, supporting each other. I would hate for either of them to start questioning their response to this, their behavior as parents, or their treatment of each other. They did and are doing a great job.They still have a child alive that needs them to function as parents who both financially and emotionally contribute to Matts life and to support him while he is in college, and it takes BOTH parents to support a child in college today.

Excellent post PE. How true.......It serves no purpose to second guess at this time why a mother in a state of understandable emotional distress choose to make a particular call.

Of course if Beth had it to do over, she wishes she would have managed to call him, but it wasn't an intentional slight. They really have done as good a job as I have seen on being divorced yet raising their children.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: katrien on March 11, 2008, 05:11:22 PM
Look who's that:

http://www.rtl.nl/shows/jensen/home/index.xml




Bram told last week in the Jensen show that he will come back next week (this week) in the Jensen show to tell what he decided.

It would surprise me if he comes to tell that he does not take the case. ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Tater on March 11, 2008, 05:12:02 PM
Does anyone think the insinuation of attorney Bram Moszkowicz into this mix will possibly cause the big documentary expose by Renee Geilen to be cancelled faster than appearances on that other program from TeleAruba with Host Castro by any chance?

I think there is a very good possibility that they may think twice now about what they say if they know they can be held accountable.  Bram does seem to have quite a rep in this regard.


Off to the ole working and lurking. . . . .

Bram hasn't agreed to take the case yet right? I would imagine that it's all in limbo so to speak.Sounds plausible to me though that they would cancel..

sounds to me as though he wants to be pretty sure he can win, he doesn't want to get beth's hopes up and then another disappointment. he said as much.

also anna, sounds as if the complaint would be against the aruban court for failure to proceed -- some sort of misconduct or malfeasance??

You're right!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Tater on March 11, 2008, 05:13:54 PM
Look who's that:

http://www.rtl.nl/shows/jensen/home/index.xml




Bram told last week in the Jensen show that he will come back next week (this week) in the Jensen show to tell what he decided.

It would surprise me if he comes to tell that he does not take the case. ::MonkeyConfused::

It would suprise me too but let's face it,stranger things have happened involving this case..You're so sweet katrien!! I'm glad you're here..:)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 11, 2008, 05:14:34 PM
******* - I have moved your post the the appropriate thread.  Please do not start up in this thread.  Next time anyone starts up here on this subject the post will be deleted.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: private eye on March 11, 2008, 05:15:08 PM
Hi Monkey's,
  Just got caught up reading.Watched the video link and listened to Dave and Beth.Seem's Dave thinks it all went down at the Sloots house..Bless his heart and Beth's heart too..One thing I've always wondered about and that is why Dave had to find out from his son that Natalee was missing.I wonder why Beth or Jug didn't call him immediatly..I don't know,just sad...
And you are trying to do what with your question.  Read the books.  Good try.  Not working.     Jack blue


You're way out of line jackb..It was a fair question and it's one that's asked by many people that don't care to go out and buy books to get the answer.This question was answered very nicely which you would have seen had you of scrolled down to see.Do not ever and I mean ever accuse me of anything,especially the act of manipulation.That is an evil accusation and I do not appreciate it one bit.When your pointing your finger at someone else,you've got three pointing right back at you.You might want to remember that!Like I said,it was a fair question and a fair answer followed..God Bless

This is the second time in the last week or so that I have seen this very same question, almost word for word, so it must be on everyone's mind. What was the fair answer and did it get answered fairly both times? I missed both answers but I definetly remember the question. Just curious.

I only asked it once and was told that Beth told her son to call Dave.I thought it to be a simple and well rounded answer. It seem's like a fair answer to me.I don't know about another question and answer and if there was one,I missed it...

I am sorry, I didn't mean you asked it twice, but I do remember seeing the question before, and I never saw that answer either. I don't think it is a "bad" question:)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Anna on March 11, 2008, 05:15:36 PM
{{edit}}.


There is a thread for addressing this:

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2694.new#new




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: katrien on March 11, 2008, 05:17:44 PM
The "open letter to Beth" were Rosita referred to on Fok. ::MonkeyHaHa::

The article from Renee Gielen.

Do you think they are stupid? They probably also read what has been written about Beth.
Probably copied everything.:MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Tater on March 11, 2008, 05:21:57 PM
Hi Monkey's,
  Just got caught up reading.Watched the video link and listened to Dave and Beth.Seem's Dave thinks it all went down at the Sloots house..Bless his heart and Beth's heart too..One thing I've always wondered about and that is why Dave had to find out from his son that Natalee was missing.I wonder why Beth or Jug didn't call him immediatly..I don't know,just sad...
And you are trying to do what with your question.  Read the books.  Good try.  Not working.     Jack blue


You're way out of line jackb..It was a fair question and it's one that's asked by many people that don't care to go out and buy books to get the answer.This question was answered very nicely which you would have seen had you of scrolled down to see.Do not ever and I mean ever accuse me of anything,especially the act of manipulation.That is an evil accusation and I do not appreciate it one bit.When your pointing your finger at someone else,you've got three pointing right back at you.You might want to remember that!Like I said,it was a fair question and a fair answer followed..God Bless

This is the second time in the last week or so that I have seen this very same question, almost word for word, so it must be on everyone's mind. What was the fair answer and did it get answered fairly both times? I missed both answers but I definetly remember the question. Just curious.

I only asked it once and was told that Beth told her son to call Dave.I thought it to be a simple and well rounded answer. It seem's like a fair answer to me.I don't know about another question and answer and if there was one,I missed it...

I am sorry, I didn't mean you asked it twice, but I do remember seeing the question before, and I never saw that answer either. I don't think it is a "bad" question:)

Thankyou PE..Big Hugs..That means alot to me coming from you. I would never stab at either parent for their actions. Hind-sight is always 20/20 and I feel sure if it could all be done over again, not one Mt.Brook student would have gone to Aruba..I pray for Dave and Beth so much.Geesh,I feel like I'm part of the family and I really am,the spiritual one..:)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 11, 2008, 05:24:18 PM
Posted by Marco at RU:

03-05-08 P&W Bram Moszkowics on the show, De Vries or Joran?

Quote from: marco
De Vries or Joran, who's responsible?

Q: Good now were' going to talk about Beth Twitty, Bram Moszkowics, you have contact with her, she's in Holland now to investigate with you if Joran vd Sloot can be juridisch , is it only about Joran or also other family members"

B: At the moment we're only concentrating on Mr. Joran vd Sloot.

Q: How did you get in contact with Mrs. Twitty?

B: Today or yesterday?

Q: No no, back then....Did you contact her?

B: No, that's a misconception, I never call people and ask them if they want to be my client.
I was called by a middleman, she then called me and asked me if I want to represent her, in the beginning she has asked around how she can find someone.

Q: And in the end, somehow she came in contact with you?

B: Yes, that's how it goes.

Q: Does she have an American lawyer?

B: Yes, there was talk about that.......but that's been blown away.

Q: Which judicial system is going to deal with Joran?

B: Either in Holland or Aruba. But that's the same.

Q: Why not in America? Is that not the country of the "claim culture"?

B: That I don't know for sure, I have still not talked to her American Lawyer, but I think that it has to do with the fact where all these awful things happened, and the law enforcement.

Q: We asked Mrs.Twitty what her motivation is, at you office, and this is what she said:

(Beth talking on tape):

We have to hope that the judicial system will kick in and that he will be prosecuted and put behind bars, but you know,  but if that does not happen, you know, we're looking at a civil action, I mean it's too late for Natalee and for us, but it's not too late for other young females that might be in his path.

Q: Lets talk about the different paths you might take. How big of a change, what's the percentage, that you can win, do you have if you begin the procedure?

B: If I confine myself with the civil procedure, I think a 85 - 90% chance that I will do it, but you have to be careful, you understand that also, look this lady can not take much more, so at the moment that you start investigating, as a lawyer you have to be sure, that there is a realistic change is,more than that, that it will succeed, because what's worse for her, if I start a civil case, and Mr. vd Sloot will win, we don't want that.

Q: So a civil case, we're talking about money........

B: No, it's not about money, this woman....................has.....................a civil case, it's that.......I will represent my client and .........we will take legal civil action, not criminal but a civil action.......against vd Sloot.

That means that I am investigating, with other people around me, also on Aruba, if it makes sense that we sue the man for an unlawful act.

Unlawful act, that means  that you did something that in society you should not have been done.

There are two anchors then, I will throw those out, one what we call "shock damage", it's a form of damage, if you experienced something terrible word speaks for itself, and if you have psychological damage, my client has that also, you can demand "shock damage".

That's one way, the other possibility I am looking at, which is also interesting,  is also based on an unlawful act,  if you take someone civil lawful, keep in mind that the man made a confession, because for me there's no question in my mind, that he made the confession a whole lot of different times in that car, and because he kept silent all this time, he committed an unlawful act against my client, because, as an example, my client has been pointed out as a material suspect, and because of this she's suffering.

Q: Because now she's a suspect herself in the disappearance of her daughter?
B: Yes! Just to say something.

Q: But how can Joran vd Sloot help this?

B: Can help what?

Q: How can Joran vd Sloot help, is it his fault that Mrs Twitty has been a suspect herself, for a little while at least?

B: Well that I can tell you, it's because he consistently has denied, until the moment he did confess, has it been possible that the eyes have been pointed towards my client......

Q: But it's his right, loose from the fact IF he did it, it is your right as a suspect, to say you are innocent.

B: That's why I am talking about a civil action with you, than he does not have the right to deny the charges.

Q: That's the difference, that's what you're talking about?

B: Well, in the civil........well lets say in the criminal case the man is a suspect he can keep still, in the civil case, because he's not talking, he has caused her (Mrs Twitty) damage. So here the obligation to keep quiet does not apply here.

Q: And does that only work if can start from the point......if the judge....that  the confessions that he made in the car to Patrick  v d Eem the right confessions are

B: Well look the whole premises, and there will stand or fall the whole case with, how do you appreciate the confession, what Joran said in the car, I, myself have no doubt about that, you can argue about that, I have colleagues they do not agree with me at all, they don't see a confession what so ever, I find that ridiculous,

That was Gerard Sprong, or Mrs Riet (?)

B: I'm not sure, but you can not persevere with dry eyes that vd Sloot 5 times in the car, yes shark, no shark,  he never took one word back, not the day after he had said it, that he never confessed, that's just nonsense.
Whatever this guy has said in the car, that's going to make an impression on the judge.

Q: Shock effect, I want to.......shock effect, damage, what's the shock?

B: That she, my client physiologically has been GEDEKOMPSEERD (I can't translate that word)     (HELP PLEASE)
and she now seeing a psychologist.......

Q: And then how can you say: That's because of you, Joran?

B: Well do you have someone else in mind? You have to connect the dots, and that's what my team and I are investigating right now, to begin with, how did she get "the shock"that can be diagnosed by a psychiatrist, that she's suffering,, I think that's possible, there's a connection, you don't have to be an Einstein to make the connection between the misery this woman has now, and the fact that her daughter has disappeared.

Q: That has to do with the fact, well the confession from Joran in Patric's car, and that's one of the things that will be seen as a confession......

B: That's very important .....

Q: because there is the suggestion that one of the things......this boy is a pathological liar, he just makes stuff up, 

B: I know that, I have heard that, but that's nonsense, because the man has never been investigated by a judge, leave alone a psychiatrist, that people are now screaming that he now, let's say, a habitual liar is, you can't take that serious.

Q: But then, how is it possible, you yourself say: it's a confession, but you can't take it serious, how is it possible then that this boy is still walking around free?

B: It's a very good question, and why that is, is because ....what was said after the De Vries's show?
We do not have enough to rearrest him, I find that remarkable, because if, in the past you had enough to lock him up, what they did on Aruba, WITHOUT  the confession, then I ask myself: What more do you want if they have what they had then, they said them self it's enough to lock him up, then you get a fantastic TV show, where they show the man made 5 confessions, that he said he did it, I think then if you count 1 + 1, that also on Aruba that's 2,

Q: But I think the judge-COMMESARIS, who back then questioned Joran vd Sloot, he came to the conclusion that Joran a big fat liar is, so you can't classify the confession in a car with a lot of camera's as a confession.

B: The  judge-COMMESARIS, should not hide behind that, because if that's the fact because that's not his job, he has to determine if there's enough evidence to pick the man up again, and the same judge found there was enough to pick him up without the confession, that's important what I say now, now he's saying that with the confession there's NOT enough evidence to pick him up again.
Now it's your turn again.......... ha ha

Q: My turn, but you can also say that the "shock damage" that Mrs. Twitty has now, is not because of Joran vd Sloot but De Vries.

B: That's a different question....

Q: It might be a different question, but it's an important one.

B: Look, at the moment my client knows what Peter de Vries got from this man, is it above being a human for he to not look at it, I think, you can't set that  after what she heard from Peter de Vries, you can't say: I don't have to see this.
She wants to know this, I think as a mother, you want to know this. What happened, coming from the mouth of Joran .......

Q: So there's no responsebility for Peter R de Vries?
The question is: who caused the shock damage?
And then you have to take a step back, and say it's the one who's responsible for the show.

B: No, of course not, the shock damage has been caused because of the fact that, and I believe that, that you have to take the confession very serious, and the shock damage has happened because of what the man said he did, he said it himself.
So you can't say: The messenger has caused the shock damage, No it's Mr vd Sloot of course. Because of his actions and what he left behind.

Q: All the confession, let's call them what you call them, all the facts has been checked and they were not happy on Aruba, the boy has not been found, the boat has not been found.

B: That's true what you are saying now, but what you see often in a lawsuit is that a judge will believe a witness even though it's been proven that he lied.
So to judge to believe the witness is not the point, if you can believe him, or catch him in a lie, the judge can think: I can trust him, it makes sense what he says, or a suspect who lies, you can disconnect the two.

Q: Believability is in question, how can you bring the believability in front of a judge?

B: First of all don't forget the criminal case is still ongoing on Aruba, also my client has given me the orders, that as soon as Aruba makes the decision to not prosecute, we're going to MAKEN EEN KLACHT BY HET HOF. (Twitty, even though if the case gets dropped she's going to complain to the court on Aruba)

Lets look again at Mrs. Twitty, what she thought was the most difficult for her to watch during the show.

(Beth on tape)
When he imitated her when she's having a seizure, or is suffering or whatever, that's when......I mean............that's the part that's the most difficult for me to watch, that's this the day, or today .......I just said: I want to come through the Tv and I just want to kill him right there, I mean now I know the answer to what happened to Natalee, and I don't have to constanlty have to spearhead and manage and gosh you know I mean it's just like it's finaly put to rest I guess,

Q: Are you being motivated because of this reason or is it a client that.....?

B: No, I have to tell you that I am more motivated in this case because I can put myself in this woman shoes.

If the case is dropped I can myself bring a complain (by the courts).

Q: When are you yourself sure of the case, When are you going to start?

B: I told my client I will tell her within two weeks.

Beth is a suspect!!!

 ::MonkeyShocked::

The "powers that be" within the investigation know beyond a doubt that the mother of Natalee Holloway had NOTHING to do with her daughter's disappearance.

Why anybody or any organization that is on a quest for the truth encompassing the disappearance of Natalee could honestly believe that cooperating with Aruban authorities is going to further that quest?

Janet

+++++++++++

Gerold Dompig
CBS NEWS
June 20, 2005

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/06/10/national/main700829.shtml

Holloway's family rushed late Friday to an old stone lighthouse beside Arisha beach after Deputy Police Commissioner Gerold Dompig told The Associated Press that one of three young men in custody admitted that "something bad happened" to Holloway  and was leading police to the scene of the alleged crime.


Gerold Dompig
FOX NEWS/ASSOCIATED PRESS
June 11, 2005

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,159252,00.html

One of the young men detained admitted "something bad happened" to the woman after they took her to the beach, a police officer said, while prosecutors said the investigation was at a crucial point. But prosecutors refused to comment on the statement by Deputy Police Commissioner Gerold Dompig (search), who told The Associated Press that the man who made that admission was leading police to the scene. He refused to identify which of the three young men who took Holloway to a northern beach the night she went missing made the statement.


Spokesperson - Aruban Minister of Justice
FOX NEWS/ASSOCIATED PRESS
June 11, 2005

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,159252,00.html

David Cruz, a spokesman for the Aruban Minister of Justice (search) told FOX News Natalee Holloway (search), who was on vacation with friends with a graduation trip when she disappeared, was confirmed dead and that authorities knew the location of her body.


Rick Leventhal
FOX Fan Central
June 15, 2005

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,159664,00.html

The next day, another official spoke to one of our producers. Edward Croues, a spokesman for the minister of justice, told Craig Rivera he had "official information" that Natalee was "confirmed dead," and told Craig her father had asked police to take him to the body and to do it before the press found out where it was. We reconfirmed the information with Croues before going on-air with it.


Karin Janssen
DECATUR DAILY/ASSOCIATED PRESS
June 12, 2005

http://www.decaturdaily.com/decaturdaily/news/050612/officials.shtml

A statement from the office of Attorney General Caren Janssen late Saturday said, "Information given by non-official sources jeopardizes the ongoing investigation and creates expectations and situations that are not based on fact."  Police refused to say Saturday whether they discovered anything that would lead to Holloway, who was last seen in the early hours of May 30.


Dave Holloway
The Meridian Star
May 28, 2006

http://www.meridianstar.com/local/local_story_148205455.html

At some point into this investigation, as time goes on and you don’t find her, you start realizing that things are not looking good. We got that confirmation pretty much from the FBI on June 10. They came to us and said the investigation appears to be heading toward a homicide case.  


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: private eye on March 11, 2008, 05:41:16 PM
Hi Monkey's,
  Just got caught up reading.Watched the video link and listened to Dave and Beth.Seem's Dave thinks it all went down at the Sloots house..Bless his heart and Beth's heart too..One thing I've always wondered about and that is why Dave had to find out from his son that Natalee was missing.I wonder why Beth or Jug didn't call him immediatly..I don't know,just sad...
And you are trying to do what with your question.  Read the books.  Good try.  Not working.     Jack blue


You're way out of line jackb..It was a fair question and it's one that's asked by many people that don't care to go out and buy books to get the answer.This question was answered very nicely which you would have seen had you of scrolled down to see.Do not ever and I mean ever accuse me of anything,especially the act of manipulation.That is an evil accusation and I do not appreciate it one bit.When your pointing your finger at someone else,you've got three pointing right back at you.You might want to remember that!Like I said,it was a fair question and a fair answer followed..God Bless

This is the second time in the last week or so that I have seen this very same question, almost word for word, so it must be on everyone's mind. What was the fair answer and did it get answered fairly both times? I missed both answers but I definetly remember the question. Just curious.

I only asked it once and was told that Beth told her son to call Dave.I thought it to be a simple and well rounded answer. It seem's like a fair answer to me.I don't know about another question and answer and if there was one,I missed it...

I am sorry, I didn't mean you asked it twice, but I do remember seeing the question before, and I never saw that answer either. I don't think it is a "bad" question:)

Thankyou PE..Big Hugs..That means alot to me coming from you. I would never stab at either parent for their actions. Hind-sight is always 20/20 and I feel sure if it could all be done over again, not one Mt.Brook student would have gone to Aruba..I pray for Dave and Beth so much.Geesh,I feel like I'm part of the family and I really am,the spiritual one..:)

To tell you the truth you all have become a part of Natalee's family


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: private eye on March 11, 2008, 05:44:18 PM
I THINk that there is a possibility for tow types of suit. One is the civil suit that recently has been discussed. The second case is a criminal case after the prosecutor formally declines to prosecute and Natalee's estate would then be allowed to hire a private attorney and prosecute the case instead of the prosecutor


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: the big hammer on March 11, 2008, 05:52:49 PM
Beth is a "SUSPECT" ?!?

Q: Because now she's a suspect herself in the disappearance of her daughter?
B: Yes! Just to say something.


I can think of a lot of avenues for redress here.

Wrongful prosecution
Criminal Abuse of prosecutorial powers
Intentionally false prosecution
Defamation
Intentional misuse of taxpayer funds
Fraud

Is this just a poor translation?  This is preposterous and if true, is as damaging to Aruba, as jvds' own on-air confession remains damaging to him.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: JE on March 11, 2008, 05:54:26 PM
I THINk that there is a possibility for tow types of suit. One is the civil suit that recently has been discussed. The second case is a criminal case after the prosecutor formally declines to prosecute and Natalee's estate would then be allowed to hire a private attorney and prosecute the case instead of the prosecutor

Katrien mentioned this:

Laatste artikelen: 12 Sv
Wetboek van Strafvordering (Sv)

Artikel 12 | Sv, Boek 1, Titel 1, Afdeling 4
   
1.
    Wordt een strafbaar feit niet vervolgd of de vervolging niet voortgezet, dan kan de rechtstreeks belanghebbende daarover schriftelijk beklag doen bij het gerechtshof, binnen het rechtsgebied waarvan de beslissing tot niet vervolging of niet verdere vervolging is genomen. Indien de beslissing tot niet vervolging is genomen door de officier van justitie bij het landelijk parket, is bevoegd het gerechtshof te 's-Gravenhage.

If a criminal offence is not prosecuted or the prosecution is not continued the party directly involved can complain in writing to the court, within whose jurisdiction the decison not to prosecute or to not continue prosecution was taken.  If the decision not to prosecute was taken by an national court then the complaint can be addressed to the court in The Hague.

I am not a lawyer and certainly not a legal translator but i hope you get the meaning LOL


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Tater on March 11, 2008, 05:54:39 PM
I THINk that there is a possibility for tow types of suit. One is the civil suit that recently has been discussed. The second case is a criminal case after the prosecutor formally declines to prosecute and Natalee's estate would then be allowed to hire a private attorney and prosecute the case instead of the prosecutor

Would the criminal case be tried in the states or Aruba?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: private eye on March 11, 2008, 05:54:50 PM
Beth is a "SUSPECT" ?!?

Q: Because now she's a suspect herself in the disappearance of her daughter?
B: Yes! Just to say something.


I can think of a lot of avenues for redress here.

Wrongful prosecution
Criminal Abuse of prosecutorial powers
Intentionally false prosecution
Defamation
Intentional misuse of taxpayer funds
Fraud

Is this just a poor translation?  This is preposterous and if true, is as damaging to Aruba, as jvds' own on-air confession remains damaging to him.

.

Everything and everybody in or connected to Aruba is SUSPECT:)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: WhiskeyGirl on March 11, 2008, 06:13:31 PM
Here are some youtubes about Joran that I just noticed.  Perhaps these are related to the "witch hunt"?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=psVbTBbpUwA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=93SrrQT-KEE

It seems like driving by his place was a tourist attraction, much like the home of Drew Peterson.  imho


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 11, 2008, 06:26:40 PM
I THINk that there is a possibility for tow types of suit. One is the civil suit that recently has been discussed. The second case is a criminal case after the prosecutor formally declines to prosecute and Natalee's estate would then be allowed to hire a private attorney and prosecute the case instead of the prosecutor

Hi PI.

To avoid having to turn over documents/statements/evidence to any outside party/agency ... I fear that Aruba will NEVER officially close the Natalee Holloway case.  It will be deemed an on-going investigation and ... be allowed to become a cold case.

I concur with Art Wood's contention that the Aruban house of cards will collapse on the day when one of those who played a role in the "something bad" that happened to Natalee Holloway or ... one of those who help dispose of her remains or ... one of those who was aware of or involved in the coverup which has prevented justice from prevailing comes to a place where he/she is ready to accept the consequences of his/her actions ... bows and reaches up ... reveals the truth through "genuine" repentance ... pleads for God's forgiveness and ... please the family's forgiveness.

Accountability in the justice system ordained by men may always be ellusive for many involved but ... the truth will have been revealed.

I pray that in God's perfect timing ... Natalee's family will experience the freedom that only the revealed truth can afford.  I pray that Natalee's family will be given the opportunity to forgive at least one of those ... who has contributed to the family's ongoing H--- on Earth ... when he/she repents.

1 John 1:9
If we confess our sins, He is faithful and just and will forgive us our sins and purify us from all unrighteousness.


Sincerely, Janet

+++++++++++

Art Wood
‘Rita Cosby Live & Direct’
December 2, 2005

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10295536/

WOOD: … The reason this case could still be solved is because there are so many people involved in Natalee’s disappearance and in the disposal of her body. When somebody talks, they’re going to all go down. This is like a house of cards.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Anna on March 11, 2008, 06:32:09 PM
Well, I just find even referring to Beth as a suspect very offensive.

I thought the burden of proof for being labeled a suspect was, according to the lovely and gracious Arleen, STRONG suspicion or reason to suspect thus and so.

Thinking it was an insurance scam because that was the false claim  they told before about Max DeVries would not qualify as reason for strong suspicion since that turned out not to be true at all.

That leaves the psychics and I do have a very hard time believing that anyone really takes them seriously.  One word against another.  But it did come from two of the government Ministers that this should be investigated so perhaps that is where this comes from?

Just more for Bram to work with, I think.  Reflects more on the mindset of the Ministers than on Beth, imo.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: WhiskeyGirl on March 11, 2008, 06:33:10 PM
Someone (or perhaps more than one) posted about the VDS home as the crime scene. 

I recall early in the case, the blogs had a number of individuals (they also suggested "There is no evidence.") that claimed J2K and Natalee were never at the VDS home.  There was an individual that claimed witnesses had seen the Kalpoe vehicle driving in that direction.

Later, when some of the PVs were published, one of the suspects indicated that they had indeed stopped at the VDS home, but did not go in.  Perhaps they didn't go into the main family unit, but could they have gone into another building?  The neighbors house?  Who were they afraid they would wake up?  Weren't the youngsters at home and on the computer?

The story seems to fall apart after the 'visit'.  imho  Jump to the confession of Joran.  What happened in between?

Isn't it possible that 2K left one behind at the VDS place and took the car home?

The fishermen did not see them on the beach.  Someone saw a boat launched, perhaps the fisherman's?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: blah on March 11, 2008, 06:34:50 PM
{{edit - Blah I've already stated I won't allow this to continue in this thread.  I'm sure you know how to start a new thread}}


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: ldstlou on March 11, 2008, 06:36:38 PM
thank you PI for the compliment on my little men, it is greatly aprreciated. They were so terrific!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: ldstlou on March 11, 2008, 06:37:33 PM
Well, I just find even referring to Beth as a suspect very offensive.

I thought the burden of proof for being labeled a suspect was, according to the lovely and gracious Arleen, STRONG suspicion or reason to suspect thus and so.

Thinking it was an insurance scam because that was the false claim  they told before about Max DeVries would not qualify as reason for strong suspicion since that turned out not to be true at all.

That leaves the psychics and I do have a very hard time believing that anyone really takes them seriously.  One word against another.  But it did come from two of the government Ministers that this should be investigated so perhaps that is where this comes from?

Just more for Bram to work with, I think.  Reflects more on the mindset of the Ministers than on Beth, imo.

.

lawsuit #1 jorine,
I hope lawsuit # 2 is renho!!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: blah on March 11, 2008, 06:40:50 PM
{{edit - Blah I've already stated I won't allow this to continue in this thread.  I'm sure you know how to start a new thread}}

{{what part of the above didn't you understand?}}


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on March 11, 2008, 06:41:00 PM
Interesting to look at the islands yearbooks..Such a small class but yet so many with the same last name..Kock,Arendsz,Arends,Maduro..Croes..and yes Wever  ::MonkeyWink::
That is interesting.Lot of them look unhappy,mainly the girls.Wonder if we can find one with Lorenzo in it?
I stumbled onto a couple of years at that school but well before Lorenzo's time  ::MonkeyWink:: No one real important in the yearbooks except Robert Wever,you may see a couple of ministers..But no one tied into this case that I know of.

http://www.colegiopariba.freeservers.com/index.html
Thank you *******.
While it's slow around here I'm going to see if I can find out more info on Lorenzo.Also,does anyone know what Freddy's parents names are?What they do on aruba?

Karma…this is some of what I have found…keep coming to dead ends…anything you can find would be appreciated…

FREDDY ZEDAN ARAMBATZIS/ARENDS…VENEZUELAN…Around 24 now and according to Joran only speaks Pap.

Father…Melody posted that he was on his death bed in Venezuela, with a smile! JE did find a 52 year old male in Venezuela…named Arambatzis.

Caps found…Zedan=0….Arambatzis=2…need to check back with him on that!

Mother.. ARAMBATZIS-RODRIGUEZ ALBERT   LILIAN REGINA
62 MONTANJA  NOORD  from Chamber records
Also have 39 F or G…not sure which right now. Also read that she was Dutch.

Kermit has an address of 7A Catiri….I followed this to a Frederick Arends on the Chamber list.

Here’s some posts I found...

Freddy's mom is a "Supervisory Director" for the Bubali Sports Club located in Noord. Bubali is also the location of the Bird Sanctuary which has 2 ponds.Here is the complete name of Freddy's mom: Freddy's mom is a "Supervisory Director" for the Bubali Sports Club located in Noord. Bubali is also the location of the Bird Sanctuary which has 2 ponds.Here is the complete name of Freddy's mom:
LILIAN REGINA ARAMBATZIS-RODRIGUEZ ALBERTIt appears that she has been married twice. I don't know if Rodriguez or Albert is her maiden name. Since she is listed as being "Dutch" I would think that "Albert" was probably her maiden name....but, I am not sure. Can anybody help me out on this? I have always thought "Zedan" was Freddy's last name until I found this other info. Could it be his middle name? You can find this information at: http://206.48.100.138/registry/registry_search.afpType in: S.C. BUBALI where it says TRADE NAME & then click search.
Posted by: Shelly | Monday, August 29, 2005
++++
 Do you remember Freddy Zedan and the house on Montana Street? His family’s name was Arambatzis-Rodriguez. There were several half- and/or step-siblings, all with different surnames.

I’m wondering if Daury could be one of them - perhaps innocent of this accusation, but related to the real person who did it.

In your post # 2,315 on previous thread, the link to picture of Freddy Zedan, code named "badboy_956", picture dated 7-13-04, shows the same guy "Freddy" as in the pictures posted earlier today.
 
He is flashing that awful gang sign, this time with both hands. There is a middle-aged woman in the background, who can't see the gang signs, and probably wouldn't know what they mean, anyway
++++
Brother … from Sharon, vms and Kermit...Ernesto Arambatzis…Miami Fl from around 1999…seems to disappeared of off the radar other than court documents from late 2007 and 2007. Graduated college in Venezuela…found that on line.

Is related to Sasha Rodriguez, maybe a half or stepsister. A couple of other Rodriguez pop up on the Dr Phil documents…not sure if they are related. Post above mentions different names.

Seems some what protected as he was let out the back door very quietly on his release and reportedly, per Harry Tho, left the country immediately.

According to a taped recording of the Kalpoes on 6/22/2005, he is the reason they were arrested!



Wow!Thank you Mum.That's a lot of info above....Sasha....joran has a Sasha listed as a family member(?)on his zorpia site I think.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on March 11, 2008, 06:42:17 PM
Does anyone know anything about this complaining to the court? I've never heard of such a thing.Just curious as to what that means..

yucatexan, snoopy, Bearlyhere, Peaches, truthseeker2, BUCKSHOT, private eye, Ree, spec_ed, trimmonthelake, WhiskeyGirl..Anyone? ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::

Sorry, Tot, I was reading through the thread.

Isn't the first thing you do is file a complaint with the court?  How else would they know what the problem is?  I don't know Aruban or Dutch law.  I think it would be the same, no?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: WhiskeyGirl on March 11, 2008, 06:44:10 PM
I haven't see Frank or Robots posting lately.  I think the SM site will become suspect if Frank returns and starts saying things like "I have the utmost faith and trust in Jossy Mansur" and Robots comes back and says that Greta and Joe T. are among the finest humans in the news.  imho


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: SunnyinTX on March 11, 2008, 06:44:34 PM
Here are some youtubes about Joran that I just noticed.  Perhaps these are related to the "witch hunt"?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=psVbTBbpUwA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=93SrrQT-KEE

It seems like driving by his place was a tourist attraction, much like the home of Drew Peterson.  imho

sure wish I could understand Dutch....thanks for psoting these...hopefully one of our Dutch posters will tell us what it's about


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on March 11, 2008, 06:46:57 PM
To IDSTLOU:
   Dear sweet Lady you are such a wonderful woman as well as a teacher of the young and as a leader in the Scouting program you have shown these young men that a community that is served by upstanding young men will continue to thrive and prosper , I am not just speaking of financial wealth but wealth in regards in our youth that will grow and be able to stand up responsibly for good verses evil .
  A very heartfelt thank you to you IDSTLOU and may I say again that I am proud to say that you are my friend as well as a fellow SM . (((( idstlou)))
  Jerry from Ohio



Good Morning Monkeys!!!

I am sending out my thank you notes to those who participated with us on Sunday. I think most of you know I invited some of my scouts out. I wanted you to know why. Here is the thank you note I am sending the boys and why it meant so much to me that they participated:



What brave young men you are to come out as you did on Sunday and take a stand and let your voices be heard, I am so proud of you all. You took a stand for a girl who you know of, but never actually knew, that is even more incredible to me. There are people all across America that have also taken a stand for Natalee, and most of us never knew her personally either. You are now part of a very special group of people who have given their voices to a very important cause; Justice for Natalee.

At the beginning of every Cub Scout meeting, we stand and say the Pledge of Allegiance together. We state:

I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America,
And to the Republic for which it stands:
One Nation under God, indivisible,
With Liberty and Justice for all.

I just want to take a minute and tell you why I am so grateful for what you did Sunday, and why I feel it is so important. I think you understand most of the words of the Pledge of Allegiance, but there are three very important words at the end that we are pledging, that we are making a commitment to, and they are; Indivisible, Liberty, and Justice. So I looked those words up in the dictionary and here is what I found:

Indivisible: incapable of being divided.

Liberty: the power of choice. The right to live one’s life without threats, fear, or some kind of retaliation.

Justice: the right to be treated justly, fairly, and according to proper laws and principle.

Our Pledge of Allegiance ends with; for All. These principles we pledge to belong to EVERY AMERICAN regardless of race, religion, color, creed or any other criteria. So my understand is that essentially, we are saying that as Americans, we stand together and can not be divided, and that we are committed to Liberty, to live our lives without fear or threats, but if our Liberty is taken away, then we also are committed to Justice. That those who took away our Liberties must be held responsible according to the Law. If you break the law, then you must be held responsible for your actions.

Unfortunately, Aruba has not given Natalee Justice. Natalee's Liberties were taken away from her when she visited Aruba, and now as Americans, we are standing up to say, Natalee deserves Justice. The bad guys need to go to court and if found guilty, then they should be put in jail. This is what you stood up and said on Sunday when you were passing out the fliers. You were true to your Pledge of Allegiance, and for this, I am so very proud of you. You may be young men, but your voices are strong and you made a difference on Sunday and stood up for our beliefs, as Americans, and as Cub Scouts who Pledge Allegiance to our Flag.

Thank you so much my brave heroes!!!


Oh Jerry, you made me cry, thank you so much!!!

Those boys are defintely standing with the girl and "Modern Day Heroes!" Their leader is pretty great as well:))))))))) Good work men! Why is there always a woman standing behind a good man????????????????????????????????????????/

And behind every good woman stands herself!

 ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: SunnyinTX on March 11, 2008, 06:48:09 PM
Well, I just find even referring to Beth as a suspect very offensive.

I thought the burden of proof for being labeled a suspect was, according to the lovely and gracious Arleen, STRONG suspicion or reason to suspect thus and so.

Thinking it was an insurance scam because that was the false claim  they told before about Max DeVries would not qualify as reason for strong suspicion since that turned out not to be true at all.

That leaves the psychics and I do have a very hard time believing that anyone really takes them seriously.  One word against another.  But it did come from two of the government Ministers that this should be investigated so perhaps that is where this comes from?

Just more for Bram to work with, I think.  Reflects more on the mindset of the Ministers than on Beth, imo..

Anna, I think there is a lot of ammunition for Bram to take on and win a civil suit.... ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: kkate on March 11, 2008, 06:48:26 PM
klaasend - As someone who does not say too much, but sees most everything, I just want to say you are such a "class act" and do such a great job.
 :smt038


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 11, 2008, 06:50:02 PM
klaasend - As someone who does not say too much, but sees most everything, I just want to say you are such a "class act" and do such a great job.
 :smt038


kkate - thanks, some days are more trying than others  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: SunnyinTX on March 11, 2008, 06:53:02 PM
klaasend - As someone who does not say too much, but sees most everything, I just want to say you are such a "class act" and do such a great job.
 :smt038


I'll second that.....Bless your heart!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on March 11, 2008, 07:11:16 PM
Posted by Marco at RU:

03-05-08 P&W Bram Moszkowics on the show, De Vries or Joran?

Quote from: marco
De Vries or Joran, who's responsible?

Q: Good now were' going to talk about Beth Twitty, Bram Moszkowics, you have contact with her, she's in Holland now to investigate with you if Joran vd Sloot can be juridisch , is it only about Joran or also other family members"

B: At the moment we're only concentrating on Mr. Joran vd Sloot.

Q: How did you get in contact with Mrs. Twitty?

B: Today or yesterday?

Q: No no, back then....Did you contact her?

B: No, that's a misconception, I never call people and ask them if they want to be my client.
I was called by a middleman, she then called me and asked me if I want to represent her, in the beginning she has asked around how she can find someone.

Q: And in the end, somehow she came in contact with you?

B: Yes, that's how it goes.

Q: Does she have an American lawyer?

B: Yes, there was talk about that.......but that's been blown away.

Q: Which judicial system is going to deal with Joran?

B: Either in Holland or Aruba. But that's the same.

Q: Why not in America? Is that not the country of the "claim culture"?

B: That I don't know for sure, I have still not talked to her American Lawyer, but I think that it has to do with the fact where all these awful things happened, and the law enforcement.

Q: We asked Mrs.Twitty what her motivation is, at you office, and this is what she said:

(Beth talking on tape):
We have to hope that the judicial system will kick in and that he will be prosecuted and put behind bars, but you know,  but if that does not happen, you know, we're looking at a civil action, I mean it's too late for Natalee and for us, but it's not too late for other young females that might be in his path.

Q: Lets talk about the different paths you might take. How big of a change, what's the percentage, that you can win, do you have if you begin the procedure?

B: If I confine myself with the civil procedure, I think a 85 - 90% chance that I will do it, but you have to be careful, you understand that also, look this lady can not take much more, so at the moment that you start investigating, as a lawyer you have to be sure, that there is a realistic change is,more than that, that it will succeed, because what's worse for her, if I start a civil case, and Mr. vd Sloot will win, we don't want that.

Q: So a civil case, we're talking about money........

B: No, it's not about money, this woman....................has.....................a civil case, it's that.......I will represent my client and .........we will take legal civil action, not criminal but a civil action.......against vd Sloot.
That means that I am investigating, with other people around me, also on Aruba, if it makes sense that we sue the man for an unlawful act.
Unlawful act, that means  that you did something that in society you should not have been done.
There are two anchors then, I will throw those out, one what we call "shock damage", it's a form of damage, if you experienced something terrible word speaks for itself, and if you have psychological damage, my client has that also, you can demand "shock damage".
That's one way, the other possibility I am looking at, which is also interesting,  is also based on an unlawful act,  if you take someone civil lawful, keep in mind that the man made a confession, because for me there's no question in my mind, that he made the confession a whole lot of different times in that car, and because he kept silent all this time, he committed an unlawful act against my client, because, as an example, my client has been pointed out as a material suspect, and because of this she's suffering.

Q: Because now she's a suspect herself in the disappearance of her daughter?

B: Yes! Just to say something.

Q: But how can Joran vd Sloot help this?

B: Can help what?

Q: How can Joran vd Sloot help, is it his fault that Mrs Twitty has been a suspect herself, for a little while at least?

B: Well that I can tell you, it's because he consistently has denied, until the moment he did confess, has it been possible that the eyes have been pointed towards my client......

Q: But it's his right, loose from the fact IF he did it, it is your right as a suspect, to say you are innocent.

B: That's why I am talking about a civil action with you, than he does not have the right to deny the charges.

Q: That's the difference, that's what you're talking about?

B: Well, in the civil........well lets say in the criminal case the man is a suspect he can keep still, in the civil case, because he's not talking, he has caused her (Mrs Twitty) damage. So here the obligation to keep quiet does not apply here.

Q: And does that only work if can start from the point......if the judge....that  the confessions that he made in the car to Patrick  v d Eem the right confessions are

B: Well look the whole premises, and there will stand or fall the whole case with, how do you appreciate the confession, what Joran said in the car, I, myself have no doubt about that, you can argue about that, I have colleagues they do not agree with me at all, they don't see a confession what so ever, I find that ridiculous,

That was Gerard Sprong, or Mrs Riet (?)

B: I'm not sure, but you can not persevere with dry eyes that vd Sloot 5 times in the car, yes shark, no shark,  he never took one word back, not the day after he had said it, that he never confessed, that's just nonsense.
Whatever this guy has said in the car, that's going to make an impression on the judge.

Q: Shock effect, I want to.......shock effect, damage, what's the shock?

B: That she, my client physiologically has been GEDEKOMPSEERD (I can't translate that word)     (HELP PLEASE)
and she now seeing a psychologist.......

Q: And then how can you say: That's because of you, Joran?

B: Well do you have someone else in mind? You have to connect the dots, and that's what my team and I are investigating right now, to begin with, how did she get "the shock"that can be diagnosed by a psychiatrist, that she's suffering,, I think that's possible, there's a connection, you don't have to be an Einstein to make the connection between the misery this woman has now, and the fact that her daughter has disappeared.

Q: That has to do with the fact, well the confession from Joran in Patric's car, and that's one of the things that will be seen as a confession......

B: That's very important .....

Q: because there is the suggestion that one of the things......this boy is a pathological liar, he just makes stuff up, 

B: I know that, I have heard that, but that's nonsense, because the man has never been investigated by a judge, leave alone a psychiatrist, that people are now screaming that he now, let's say, a habitual liar is, you can't take that serious.

Q: But then, how is it possible, you yourself say: it's a confession, but you can't take it serious, how is it possible then that this boy is still walking around free?

B: It's a very good question, and why that is, is because ....what was said after the De Vries's show?
We do not have enough to rearrest him, I find that remarkable, because if, in the past you had enough to lock him up, what they did on Aruba, WITHOUT  the confession, then I ask myself: What more do you want if they have what they had then, they said them self it's enough to lock him up, then you get a fantastic TV show, where they show the man made 5 confessions, that he said he did it, I think then if you count 1 + 1, that also on Aruba that's 2,

Q: But I think the judge-COMMESARIS, who back then questioned Joran vd Sloot, he came to the conclusion that Joran a big fat liar is, so you can't classify the confession in a car with a lot of camera's as a confession.

B: The  judge-COMMESARIS, should not hide behind that, because if that's the fact because that's not his job, he has to determine if there's enough evidence to pick the man up again, and the same judge found there was enough to pick him up without the confession, that's important what I say now, now he's saying that with the confession there's NOT enough evidence to pick him up again.
Now it's your turn again.......... ha ha

Q: My turn, but you can also say that the "shock damage" that Mrs. Twitty has now, is not because of Joran vd Sloot but De Vries.

B: That's a different question....

Q: It might be a different question, but it's an important one.

B: Look, at the moment my client knows what Peter de Vries got from this man, is it above being a human for he to not look at it, I think, you can't set that  after what she heard from Peter de Vries, you can't say: I don't have to see this.
She wants to know this, I think as a mother, you want to know this. What happened, coming from the mouth of Joran .......

Q: So there's no responsebility for Peter R de Vries?
The question is: who caused the shock damage?
And then you have to take a step back, and say it's the one who's responsible for the show.

B: No, of course not, the shock damage has been caused because of the fact that, and I believe that, that you have to take the confession very serious, and the shock damage has happened because of what the man said he did, he said it himself.
So you can't say: The messenger has caused the shock damage, No it's Mr vd Sloot of course. Because of his actions and what he left behind.

Q: All the confession, let's call them what you call them, all the facts has been checked and they were not happy on Aruba, the boy has not been found, the boat has not been found.

B: That's true what you are saying now, but what you see often in a lawsuit is that a judge will believe a witness even though it's been proven that he lied.
So to judge to believe the witness is not the point, if you can believe him, or catch him in a lie, the judge can think: I can trust him, it makes sense what he says, or a suspect who lies, you can disconnect the two.

Q: Believability is in question, how can you bring the believability in front of a judge?

B: First of all don't forget the criminal case is still ongoing on Aruba, also my client has given me the orders, that as soon as Aruba makes the decision to not prosecute, we're going to MAKEN EEN KLACHT BY HET HOF. (Twitty, even though if the case gets dropped she's going to complain to the court on Aruba)

Lets look again at Mrs. Twitty, what she thought was the most difficult for her to watch during the show.

(Beth on tape)
When he imitated her when she's having a seizure, or is suffering or whatever, that's when......I mean............that's the part that's the most difficult for me to watch, that's this the day, or today .......I just said: I want to come through the Tv and I just want to kill him right there, I mean now I know the answer to what happened to Natalee, and I don't have to constanlty have to spearhead and manage and gosh you know I mean it's just like it's finaly put to rest I guess,

Q: Are you being motivated because of this reason or is it a client that.....?

B: No, I have to tell you that I am more motivated in this case because I can put myself in this woman shoes.

If the case is dropped I can myself bring a complain (by the courts).

Q: When are you yourself sure of the case, When are you going to start?

B: I told my client I will tell her within two weeks.

The  judge-COMMESARIS
Does this"Commesaris"mean judge or justice or is it the name of the judge?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 11, 2008, 07:12:12 PM
Someone (or perhaps more than one) posted about the VDS home as the crime scene. 

I recall early in the case, the blogs had a number of individuals (they also suggested "There is no evidence.") that claimed J2K and Natalee were never at the VDS home.  There was an individual that claimed witnesses had seen the Kalpoe vehicle driving in that direction.

Later, when some of the PVs were published, one of the suspects indicated that they had indeed stopped at the VDS home, but did not go in.  Perhaps they didn't go into the main family unit, but could they have gone into another building?  The neighbors house?  Who were they afraid they would wake up?  Weren't the youngsters at home and on the computer?

The story seems to fall apart after the 'visit'.  imho  Jump to the confession of Joran.  What happened in between?

Isn't it possible that 2K left one behind at the VDS place and took the car home?

The fishermen did not see them on the beach.  Someone saw a boat launched, perhaps the fisherman's?

Obviously ... Jug, Dave and Beth were privy to Joran's June 13, 2005 suspect statement ... a statement that has yet to be revealed.

Janet

++++++++++

Beth Holloway
Loving Natalee

Page 136

Jug, Dave, and I go with Vinda to attorney general Theresa Croes' office.  There, prosecuting attorney Karin Janssen comes in and lays a stack of statements on the conference table in from of us.  Vinda's assistant rifles through them and begins to read one given by Joran van der Sloot, translating from Dutch to English.  Prosecutor Janssen leaves the room.  We are not told what the interrogator asks, but these are Joran's words, his responses, of June 9, 2005. We are not allowed to have copies, so I write it all down.

<snipped>

Page 141
The prime suspect, Joran, is question again on June 11, 2005.  When asked to cooperate with the police on this date he simply says, "No statement.  This is the whole truth. No more."  Then two days later, on June 13, 2005, Joran declares that his previous statements are not true and offers this account:

"My third statement is not true.  Now the truth.  We drove to my house at 1:40 a.m. on May 30.  I want her to come in.  I have sex with her.  Next, we go to the beach and walk to the fishermen's huts ... "


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: JE on March 11, 2008, 07:16:05 PM
Someone (or perhaps more than one) posted about the VDS home as the crime scene. 

I recall early in the case, the blogs had a number of individuals (they also suggested "There is no evidence.") that claimed J2K and Natalee were never at the VDS home.  There was an individual that claimed witnesses had seen the Kalpoe vehicle driving in that direction.

Later, when some of the PVs were published, one of the suspects indicated that they had indeed stopped at the VDS home, but did not go in.  Perhaps they didn't go into the main family unit, but could they have gone into another building?  The neighbors house?  Who were they afraid they would wake up?  Weren't the youngsters at home and on the computer?

The story seems to fall apart after the 'visit'.  imho  Jump to the confession of Joran.  What happened in between?

Isn't it possible that 2K left one behind at the VDS place and took the car home?

The fishermen did not see them on the beach.  Someone saw a boat launched, perhaps the fisherman's?

Obviously ... Jug, Dave and Beth were privy to Joran's June 13, 2005 suspect statement ... a statement that has yet to be revealed.

Janet

++++++++++

Beth Holloway
Loving Natalee

Page 136

Jug, Dave, and I go with Vinda to attorney general Theresa Croes' office.  There, prosecuting attorney Karin Janssen comes in and lays a stack of statements on the conference table in from of us.  Vinda's assistant rifles through them and begins to read one given by Joran van der Sloot, translating from Dutch to English.  Prosecutor Janssen leaves the room.  We are not told what the interrogator asks, but these are Joran's words, his responses, of June 9, 2005. We are not allowed to have copies, so I write it all down.

<snipped>

Page 141
The prime suspect, Joran, is question again on June 11, 2005.  When asked to cooperate with the police on this date he simply says, "No statement.  This is the whole truth. No more."  Then two days later, on June 13, 2005, Joran declares that his previous statements are not true and offers this account:

"My third statement is not true.  Now the truth.  We drove to my house at 1:40 a.m. on May 30.  I want her to come in.  I have sex with her.  Next, we go to the beach and walk to the fishermen's huts ... "

(http://i25.tinypic.com/2lbcat.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: private eye on March 11, 2008, 07:16:13 PM
I THINk that there is a possibility for tow types of suit. One is the civil suit that recently has been discussed. The second case is a criminal case after the prosecutor formally declines to prosecute and Natalee's estate would then be allowed to hire a private attorney and prosecute the case instead of the prosecutor

Hi PI.

To avoid having to turn over documents/statements/evidence to any outside party/agency ... I fear that Aruba will NEVER officially close the Natalee Holloway case.  It will be deemed an on-going investigation and ... be allowed to become a cold case.

I concur with Art Wood's contention that the Aruban house of cards will collapse on the day when one of those who played a role in the "something bad" that happened to Natalee Holloway or ... one of those who help dispose of her remains or ... one of those who was aware of or involved in the coverup which has prevented justice from prevailing comes to a place where he/she is ready to accept the consequences of his/her actions ... bows and reaches up ... reveals the truth through "genuine" repentance ... pleads for God's forgiveness and ... please the family's forgiveness.

Accountability in the justice system ordained by men may always be ellusive for many involved but ... the truth will have been revealed.

I pray that in God's perfect timing ... Natalee's family will experience the freedom that only the revealed truth can afford.  I pray that Natalee's family will be given the opportunity to forgive at least one of those ... who has contributed to the family's ongoing H--- on Earth ... when he/she repents.

1 John 1:9
If we confess our sins, He is faithful and just and will forgive us our sins and purify us from all unrighteousness.


Sincerely, Janet

+++++++++++

Art Wood
‘Rita Cosby Live & Direct’
December 2, 2005

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10295536/

WOOD: … The reason this case could still be solved is because there are so many people involved in Natalee’s disappearance and in the disposal of her body. When somebody talks, they’re going to all go down. This is like a house of cards.


They appreciate the kind words, especially from someone as knowledgeable as you are about the case. It is indeed a gift to be strong enough as a person to forgive someone, as the forgiver is rewarded far greater than the forgiven I believe. I hope that Beth and Dave in particular prove strong enough to one day be able to forgive Joran, even while insisting that justice be accomplished. A heart full of hatred has no room for love,enjoyment, contentment, and happiness. A heart full of hatred is a heavy heart to bear.

The trick is to be able to grant forgiveness, but still be able to focus on pushing for justice. At this point, I feel as if the people allegedly attacking Joran, are actually the people who represent hope and a future for Joran. If he isn't allowed to confess and repent, he will have no chance for a productive rewarding life. It is his parents and their friends, the forces from the dark, who are holding on to Joran steadfastly trying to keep him from the love of God.

Some people will say that it doesn't seem that my behavior for example is reflective of Christian teachings, and I honestly don't know the answer to that. I feel that the court of public opinion is the only viable means to seeing that justice is served and that Joran is driven into the arms of his Father. For me, to a certain degree, it means playing this out in the public arena, and to do that sometimes I make mean spirited remarks about Joran. But I can forgive Joran and still feel compelled to make sure he is not content in his life absent repentance and confession, and that is what I try and do. I don't have to feel he goes unpunished, and I honestly would punish him myself if ever given the opportunity, to be able to forgive him.

I believe as I am spanking his butt I will be saying that this is going to hurt me more than it does you:), but you deserve and need this, and of course I feel obligated to give it to you. Usually that kind of love comes at the hands of your father, at a much earlier age. To that all I can say is Joran, better late than never, and I am truly sorry your father did such a miserable job raising you.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: private eye on March 11, 2008, 07:21:58 PM
I also agree with you on them closing the case. A couple of times they have said it was closed only to scramble and say no it is not closed. I am curious though if a private attorney prosecutes the case, do they have the same powers that the prosecutor has?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on March 11, 2008, 07:28:59 PM
I haven't see Frank or Robots posting lately.  I think the SM site will become suspect if Frank returns and starts saying things like "I have the utmost faith and trust in Jossy Mansur" and Robots comes back and says that Greta and Joe T. are among the finest humans in the news.  imho
LOL!WhiskeyGirl....I think you are right :)
I do miss both Robots and Frank.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on March 11, 2008, 07:31:22 PM
Private Eye - yes, Janet explained it very well in a couple posts in response to Tot's original post:

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2689.msg363689#msg363689

The whole situation is sad, but personally I think Beth and Dave have worked together better than 98% of all other people similiar situated. When it has counted they have both been there for each other, supporting each other. I would hate for either of them to start questioning their response to this, their behavior as parents, or their treatment of each other. They did and are doing a great job.They still have a child alive that needs them to function as parents who both financially and emotionally contribute to Matts life and to support him while he is in college, and it takes BOTH parents to support a child in college today.

Excellent post PE. How true.......It serves no purpose to second guess at this time why a mother in a state of understandable emotional distress choose to make a particular call.

The first thing that happens when you are told your child is missing, that (s)he is not where (s)he is supposed to be and you know that child well enough to know (s)he always follows the rules, is you go into panic mode.  You are so focused on getting to the place where you think your child is, your mind goes on auto pilot and you get from the starting point where you heard about it, to the ending point without your feet ever touching the ground or your tires ever touching the road. 

If it was possible to travel through space, this is the point where it I believe it would happen.  The intensity of your focus in addition to the fight and flight combination almost puts you into orbit.  Nothing else exists, I am not sure you even breathe. 

I think Beth's motherly instincts also included her son.  She had to tell him she was not going to be home, after all, she is his mother too.  She would want to keep him safe at this time.  The rest of the world does not even exist during this response, imo.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on March 11, 2008, 07:33:10 PM
Does anyone think the insinuation of attorney Bram Moszkowicz into this mix will possibly cause the big documentary expose by Renee Geilen to be cancelled faster than appearances on that other program from TeleAruba with Host Castro by any chance?

I think there is a very good possibility that they may think twice now about what they say if they know they can be held accountable.  Bram does seem to have quite a rep in this regard.


Off to the ole working and lurking. . . . .

Bram hasn't agreed to take the case yet right? I would imagine that it's all in limbo so to speak.Sounds plausible to me though that they would cancel..

Notice by the end of the transcript, he calls her "my client."   ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 11, 2008, 07:33:40 PM
I haven't see Frank or Robots posting lately.  I think the SM site will become suspect if Frank returns and starts saying things like "I have the utmost faith and trust in Jossy Mansur" and Robots comes back and says that Greta and Joe T. are among the finest humans in the news.  imho
LOL!WhiskeyGirl....I think you are right :)
I do miss both Robots and Frank.

Not sure where Frank is but I know Robots is till working "under cover" and sometimes posting on the front page of SM  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Tater on March 11, 2008, 07:35:57 PM
Does anyone think the insinuation of attorney Bram Moszkowicz into this mix will possibly cause the big documentary expose by Renee Geilen to be cancelled faster than appearances on that other program from TeleAruba with Host Castro by any chance?

I think there is a very good possibility that they may think twice now about what they say if they know they can be held accountable.  Bram does seem to have quite a rep in this regard.


Off to the ole working and lurking. . . . .

Bram hasn't agreed to take the case yet right? I would imagine that it's all in limbo so to speak.Sounds plausible to me though that they would cancel..

Notice by the end of the transcript, he calls her "my client."   ::MonkeyWink::

Why you little smarty pants!!! ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: BTgirl on March 11, 2008, 07:37:33 PM
I haven't see Frank or Robots posting lately.  I think the SM site will become suspect if Frank returns and starts saying things like "I have the utmost faith and trust in Jossy Mansur" and Robots comes back and says that Greta and Joe T. are among the finest humans in the news.  imho
LOL!WhiskeyGirl....I think you are right :)
I do miss both Robots and Frank.

Not sure where Frank is but I know Robots is till working "under cover" and sometimes posting on the front page of SM  ::MonkeyWink::

I miss our Robots' cheerfulness and positive attitude. He needs to get his behind back in here and post once in a while.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on March 11, 2008, 07:37:47 PM
I haven't see Frank or Robots posting lately.  I think the SM site will become suspect if Frank returns and starts saying things like "I have the utmost faith and trust in Jossy Mansur" and Robots comes back and says that Greta and Joe T. are among the finest humans in the news.  imho
LOL!WhiskeyGirl....I think you are right :)
I do miss both Robots and Frank.

Not sure where Frank is but I know Robots is till working "under cover" and sometimes posting on the front page of SM  ::MonkeyWink::
:) I read and see him there but still miss his optimisim here in the cage. ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: ldstlou on March 11, 2008, 07:38:50 PM
I haven't see Frank or Robots posting lately.  I think the SM site will become suspect if Frank returns and starts saying things like "I have the utmost faith and trust in Jossy Mansur" and Robots comes back and says that Greta and Joe T. are among the finest humans in the news.  imho
LOL!WhiskeyGirl....I think you are right :)
I do miss both Robots and Frank.

Not sure where Frank is but I know Robots is till working "under cover" and sometimes posting on the front page of SM  ::MonkeyWink::

I miss our Robots' cheerfulness and positive attitude. He needs to get his behind back in here and post once in a while.

I agree!!! Roooobots...wheeere aaaare yooou? ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 11, 2008, 07:39:48 PM
O/T REMINDER

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/Pretzer031108.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: ldstlou on March 11, 2008, 07:39:55 PM
Does anyone think the insinuation of attorney Bram Moszkowicz into this mix will possibly cause the big documentary expose by Renee Geilen to be cancelled faster than appearances on that other program from TeleAruba with Host Castro by any chance?

I think there is a very good possibility that they may think twice now about what they say if they know they can be held accountable.  Bram does seem to have quite a rep in this regard.


Off to the ole working and lurking. . . . .

Bram hasn't agreed to take the case yet right? I would imagine that it's all in limbo so to speak.Sounds plausible to me though that they would cancel..

Notice by the end of the transcript, he calls her "my client."   ::MonkeyWink::

great eye!! I didn't notice that!! That is a good sign I would think!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Destiny on March 11, 2008, 07:46:07 PM
I haven't see Frank or Robots posting lately.  I think the SM site will become suspect if Frank returns and starts saying things like "I have the utmost faith and trust in Jossy Mansur" and Robots comes back and says that Greta and Joe T. are among the finest humans in the news.  imho
LOL!WhiskeyGirl....I think you are right :)
I do miss both Robots and Frank.

Not sure where Frank is but I know Robots is till working "under cover" and sometimes posting on the front page of SM  ::MonkeyWink::

Klaas...tell Robots he's been under the sheets long enough!  Time for him to get his rusty butt back *here*...undercover my arse....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 11, 2008, 07:55:04 PM
O/T REMINDER

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/Pretzer031108.jpg)

Show starts in 5 minutes - tune in now!

http://scaredmonkeysradio.com/radio.m3u


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 11, 2008, 08:01:38 PM
ON NOW!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 11, 2008, 08:01:40 PM
I THINk that there is a possibility for tow types of suit. One is the civil suit that recently has been discussed. The second case is a criminal case after the prosecutor formally declines to prosecute and Natalee's estate would then be allowed to hire a private attorney and prosecute the case instead of the prosecutor

Hi PI.

To avoid having to turn over documents/statements/evidence to any outside party/agency ... I fear that Aruba will NEVER officially close the Natalee Holloway case.  It will be deemed an on-going investigation and ... be allowed to become a cold case.

I concur with Art Wood's contention that the Aruban house of cards will collapse on the day when one of those who played a role in the "something bad" that happened to Natalee Holloway or ... one of those who help dispose of her remains or ... one of those who was aware of or involved in the coverup which has prevented justice from prevailing comes to a place where he/she is ready to accept the consequences of his/her actions ... bows and reaches up ... reveals the truth through "genuine" repentance ... pleads for God's forgiveness and ... please the family's forgiveness.

Accountability in the justice system ordained by men may always be ellusive for many involved but ... the truth will have been revealed.

I pray that in God's perfect timing ... Natalee's family will experience the freedom that only the revealed truth can afford.  I pray that Natalee's family will be given the opportunity to forgive at least one of those ... who has contributed to the family's ongoing H--- on Earth ... when he/she repents.

1 John 1:9
If we confess our sins, He is faithful and just and will forgive us our sins and purify us from all unrighteousness.


Sincerely, Janet

+++++++++++

Art Wood
‘Rita Cosby Live & Direct’
December 2, 2005

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10295536/

WOOD: … The reason this case could still be solved is because there are so many people involved in Natalee’s disappearance and in the disposal of her body. When somebody talks, they’re going to all go down. This is like a house of cards.


They appreciate the kind words, especially from someone as knowledgeable as you are about the case. It is indeed a gift to be strong enough as a person to forgive someone, as the forgiver is rewarded far greater than the forgiven I believe. I hope that Beth and Dave in particular prove strong enough to one day be able to forgive Joran, even while insisting that justice be accomplished. A heart full of hatred has no room for love,enjoyment, contentment, and happiness. A heart full of hatred is a heavy heart to bear.

The trick is to be able to grant forgiveness, but still be able to focus on pushing for justice. At this point, I feel as if the people allegedly attacking Joran, are actually the people who represent hope and a future for Joran. If he isn't allowed to confess and repent, he will have no chance for a productive rewarding life. It is his parents and their friends, the forces from the dark, who are holding on to Joran steadfastly trying to keep him from the love of God.

Some people will say that it doesn't seem that my behavior for example is reflective of Christian teachings, and I honestly don't know the answer to that. I feel that the court of public opinion is the only viable means to seeing that justice is served and that Joran is driven into the arms of his Father. For me, to a certain degree, it means playing this out in the public arena, and to do that sometimes I make mean spirited remarks about Joran. But I can forgive Joran and still feel compelled to make sure he is not content in his life absent repentance and confession, and that is what I try and do. I don't have to feel he goes unpunished, and I honestly would punish him myself if ever given the opportunity, to be able to forgive him.

I believe as I am spanking his butt I will be saying that this is going to hurt me more than it does you:), but you deserve and need this, and of course I feel obligated to give it to you. Usually that kind of love comes at the hands of your father, at a much earlier age. To that all I can say is Joran, better late than never, and I am truly sorry your father did such a miserable job raising you.

PI ... I agree with you 100%.

The line was drawn in the sand over 2000 years ago ... repentence and forgiveness is a package deal.

1 John 1:9
If we confess our sins, He is faithful and just and will forgive us our sins and purify us from all unrighteousness.


However ... a person who has repented and ... has been forgiven by those he wronged is not spared from accepting personal responsibility for his actions.  His new heart should dictate that he would willingly take responsibility.

Example:  Eldest son who humbled his Dad and me as a teenager and ... believe me ... prior to coloring each month ... I have a head full of grey hairs to prove it.

When this guy was 17 years old and ... was given the priviledge to drive the family car ... the rule was clearly understood ... a driving infraction implied the return of the keys and ... length of time ... our call.

Well ... first speeding ticket ... return of keys was demanded.  This 17 year old in tears (not a pretty sight) begged our forgiveness ... it would never happend again.  Dad and Mom forgave repentant son.

 ::MonkeyCool::

However ... repentant and forgiven son could not understand why  repentance and forgiveness did not imply the return of those keys.

 ::MonkeyShocked::

Whether eldest son understood that day or not ... a lesson was learned ... in the learning process consequences for wrong choices must be applied ... not spared. 

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: ldstlou on March 11, 2008, 08:03:04 PM
I am so darned nervous!! I have a terrible voice...don't laugh at me!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: mrs. red on March 11, 2008, 08:04:11 PM
i have  a HUGE headache after reading my emails....

going to make soup for Church for Lenten Services


Keep the faith....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 11, 2008, 08:08:05 PM
I am so darned nervous!! I have a terrible voice...don't laugh at me!!!

I'll try not to laugh, LOL  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 11, 2008, 08:08:39 PM
i have  a HUGE headache after reading my emails....

going to make soup for Church for Lenten Services


Keep the faith....

Try being in my shoes


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: ldstlou on March 11, 2008, 08:09:13 PM
I am so darned nervous!! I have a terrible voice...don't laugh at me!!!

I'll try not to laugh, LOL  ::MonkeyHaHa::

STOP!!!! now I am doubly nervous!!!!! ::MonkeyConfused::  lol


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: jackb on March 11, 2008, 08:12:36 PM
I also agree with you on them closing the case. A couple of times they have said it was closed only to scramble and say no it is not closed. I am curious though if a private attorney prosecutes the case, do they have the same powers that the prosecutor has?

Was that my kid I would forgive him after I nailed his balls to a tree and shot him stone cold dead.   Jack b


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: SunnyinTX on March 11, 2008, 08:22:15 PM
O/T REMINDER

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/Pretzer031108.jpg)

Show starts in 5 minutes - tune in now!

http://scaredmonkeysradio.com/radio.m3u

I HATE Drew Peterson....slime bucket asswipe!!  I have to keep Dana muted til he is finished...would someone pelase let me know when he is finished!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 11, 2008, 08:23:06 PM
The Drew Peterson segment is almost over.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: ldstlou on March 11, 2008, 08:23:40 PM
O/T REMINDER

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/Pretzer031108.jpg)

Show starts in 5 minutes - tune in now!

http://scaredmonkeysradio.com/radio.m3u

I HATE Drew Peterson....slime bucket asswipe!!  I have to keep Dana muted til he is finished...would someone pelase let me know when he is finished!!

you are always so shy about your feelings sunny!!! lol


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: SunnyinTX on March 11, 2008, 08:24:51 PM
I am so darned nervous!! I have a terrible voice...don't laugh at me!!!

Now stop that...you will do great!! ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: SunnyinTX on March 11, 2008, 08:25:44 PM
i have  a HUGE headache after reading my emails....

going to make soup for Church for Lenten Services


Keep the faith....

hugs to you and Red....and Klass!!  


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: ldstlou on March 11, 2008, 08:26:42 PM
I am so darned nervous!! I have a terrible voice...don't laugh at me!!!

Now stop that...you will do great!! ::MonkeyDance::

here's me:
 :smt078

lol


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 11, 2008, 08:27:17 PM
Segment with Drew Peterson is over.  Dana mostly just had a conversation with Drew Peterson, Dana did not interrogate him. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: SunnyinTX on March 11, 2008, 08:27:34 PM
The Drew Peterson segment is almost over.
Whew...Dana is going to have to disinfect!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: SunnyinTX on March 11, 2008, 08:30:35 PM
O/T REMINDER

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/Pretzer031108.jpg)

Show starts in 5 minutes - tune in now!

http://scaredmonkeysradio.com/radio.m3u

I HATE Drew Peterson....slime bucket asswipe!!  I have to keep Dana muted til he is finished...would someone pelase let me know when he is finished!!

you are always so shy about your feelings sunny!!! lol

LOL...well you know what a shy, quiet wall flower I am ::MonkeyWink::  C is coming into my inner sanctum to hear you on Dana's show....should we call in and ask you questions????  JUST KIDDING!!!! ::MonkeyTongue::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: SunnyinTX on March 11, 2008, 08:32:24 PM
Segment with Drew Peterson is over.  Dana mostly just had a conversation with Drew Peterson, Dana did not interrogate him. 

thanks Klaas...I can't even stand to hear his voice....I'd love to cut his bxlls off!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: ldstlou on March 11, 2008, 08:33:22 PM
O/T REMINDER

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/Pretzer031108.jpg)

Show starts in 5 minutes - tune in now!

http://scaredmonkeysradio.com/radio.m3u

I HATE Drew Peterson....slime bucket asswipe!!  I have to keep Dana muted til he is finished...would someone pelase let me know when he is finished!!

you are always so shy about your feelings sunny!!! lol

LOL...well you know what a shy, quiet wall flower I am ::MonkeyWink::  C is coming into my inner sanctum to hear you on Dana's show....should we call in and ask you questions????  JUST KIDDING!!!! ::MonkeyTongue::

lol...tell him behave or I will tell what a great dancer he is!! lol


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: JE on March 11, 2008, 08:34:18 PM
Put yourselves in jorans place

No matter what other people may or may not wish upon you
it can never be worse than what you have done to yourself
No one will ever believe a word you say
indifference at the least and hatred at the most is your fate
and the worst part is that nothing you can do will change this
if you confess to clear your conscience you will need proof to support it
but just as there is no proof that you are responsible there is neither proof that you re not
In the eyes of the world you re guilty and all you say beyond this point will be perceived as a lie
in other words do not worry about what others wish upon you
there is no hell worse than the one you ve created for yourself


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: SunnyinTX on March 11, 2008, 08:36:40 PM


I HATE Drew Peterson....slime bucket asswipe!!  I have to keep Dana muted til he is finished...would someone pelase let me know when he is finished!!

you are always so shy about your feelings sunny!!! lol

LOL...well you know what a shy, quiet wall flower I am ::MonkeyWink::  C is coming into my inner sanctum to hear you on Dana's show....should we call in and ask you questions????  JUST KIDDING!!!! ::MonkeyTongue::

lol...tell him behave or I will tell what a great dancer he is!! lol

ROTFLMAO......now that's FUNNY!!!! ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::  wouldn't ya know I'd marry someone who can't dance!  LOL


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 11, 2008, 08:37:36 PM
Now on - Women in Crime Inc


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: ldstlou on March 11, 2008, 08:37:50 PM


I HATE Drew Peterson....slime bucket asswipe!!  I have to keep Dana muted til he is finished...would someone pelase let me know when he is finished!!

you are always so shy about your feelings sunny!!! lol

LOL...well you know what a shy, quiet wall flower I am ::MonkeyWink::  C is coming into my inner sanctum to hear you on Dana's show....should we call in and ask you questions????  JUST KIDDING!!!! ::MonkeyTongue::

lol...tell him behave or I will tell what a great dancer he is!! lol

ROTFLMAO......now that's FUNNY!!!! ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::  wouldn't ya know I'd marry someone who can't dance!  LOL

is C laughing? tell him to keep his fingers off the phone and all will be well!!! hahahahaha


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: ldstlou on March 11, 2008, 08:38:22 PM
Now on - Women in Crime Inc

now this is cool!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Blue Moon on March 11, 2008, 08:39:54 PM
Put yourselves in jorans place

No matter what other people may or may not wish upon you
it can never be worse than what you have done to yourself
No one will ever believe a word you say
indifference at the least and hatred at the most is your fate
and the worst part is that nothing you can do will change this
if you confess to clear your conscience you will need proof to support it
but just as there is no proof that you are responsible there is neither proof that you re not
In the eyes of the world you re guilty and all you say beyond this point will be perceived as a lie
in other words do not worry about what others wish upon you
there is no hell worse than the one you ve created for yourself

This is a great post.  I have said in the past Don't rush the triall, Joran's hell is right here on earth and he will never be able to run from it.  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: SunnyinTX on March 11, 2008, 08:48:34 PM
Put yourselves in jorans place

No matter what other people may or may not wish upon you
it can never be worse than what you have done to yourself
No one will ever believe a word you say
indifference at the least and hatred at the most is your fate
and the worst part is that nothing you can do will change this
if you confess to clear your conscience you will need proof to support it
but just as there is no proof that you are responsible there is neither proof that you re not
In the eyes of the world you re guilty and all you say beyond this point will be perceived as a lie
in other words do not worry about what others wish upon you
there is no hell worse than the one you ve created for yourself

JE...that's true ...if you are normal...there is nothing normal about jvds.......he has no soul.....how many normal 17yo's have there own apartment, where they, with the approval of their parents, are allowed to have young women come and spend the night,...how old are these young women?? how many are allowed to drink and gamble and even have VIP passes to bars (C&C), how many have father's who accompany them to casino's to gamble and buy them porno, how many normal 17yo's have unlimited amounts of money??...the list goes on and on.....no, there is nothing normal about jvds.......he will harm another young woman....it will happen...unless he is STOPPED


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Destiny on March 11, 2008, 08:53:19 PM
Segment with Drew Peterson is over.  Dana mostly just had a conversation with Drew Peterson, Dana did not interrogate him. 

thanks Klaas...I can't even stand to hear his voice....I'd love to cut his bxlls off!!!

Oh geeze...I'll trade you 4 marbles... a twinkie from my lunch...and, my roller skates..if...if... if you let me cut just one off...puleeezzzzze...huh...wouldja...huh????


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: JE on March 11, 2008, 08:53:32 PM
unless he s stopped or..... self destructs


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 11, 2008, 08:53:55 PM
Hope you guys are listening to this interview on Dana Pretzer, great interview with these women.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 11, 2008, 08:55:01 PM
Hope you guys are listening to this interview on Dana Pretzer, great interview with these women.

Link to their website:

http://www.womenincrimeink.blogspot.com/



Lisa up next! ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 11, 2008, 09:00:35 PM
Lisa - you sound wonderful!   ::MonkeyDance::

Aruba didn't like them being there.  One of the most exciting things that happened was after the show, everyone who went supporting Sunny and Lisa came away supporting Natalee and the cause.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: vms on March 11, 2008, 09:01:56 PM
It was a waste of energy for her to be worried, she's doing great!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: SunnyinTX on March 11, 2008, 09:02:22 PM
Segment with Drew Peterson is over.  Dana mostly just had a conversation with Drew Peterson, Dana did not interrogate him. 

thanks Klaas...I can't even stand to hear his voice....I'd love to cut his bxlls off!!!

Oh geeze...I'll trade you 4 marbles... a twinkie from my lunch...and, my roller skates..if...if... if you let me cut just one off...puleeezzzzze...huh...wouldja...huh????

Oh you push a hard bargain....OK...you got one ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: SunnyinTX on March 11, 2008, 09:03:45 PM
GO LISA....you are doing GREAT!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 11, 2008, 09:03:55 PM
NO JUSTICE FOR NATALEE - NO TOURISTS FOR ARUBA

WE STAND WITH THE GIRL!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 11, 2008, 09:04:46 PM
GO LISA....you are doing GREAT!!!

GREAT INTERVIEW LISA!  You sound wonderful!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: SunnyinTX on March 11, 2008, 09:05:34 PM
GO LISA....you are doing GREAT!!!

Lisa as Dana said YOU KICKED ASS!!!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 11, 2008, 09:05:34 PM
GREAT SHOW DANA!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: snoopy on March 11, 2008, 09:06:47 PM


Lisa you were awesome.  I'm proud to call you my friend.  All of you should be very proud of yourselves.

No justice for Natalee - No tourist for Aruba.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: SunnyinTX on March 11, 2008, 09:07:03 PM
GREAT SHOW DANA!

did anyone get those ladies website????


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: ldstlou on March 11, 2008, 09:07:07 PM
thank you Dana, thanks Monkeys!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: snoopy on March 11, 2008, 09:07:27 PM
GO LISA....you are doing GREAT!!!

Lisa as Dana said YOU KICKED ASS!!!!!!

Absolutely!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Kat_Gram on March 11, 2008, 09:07:43 PM
It was on early !!!! Next time, call me at 1-800-Get-a-Clue, ask for Kat.
Heard Lisa who sounded very good, nice, intelligent, caring and articulate.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: ldstlou on March 11, 2008, 09:07:56 PM


Lisa you were awesome.  I'm proud to call you my friend.  All of you should be very proud of yourselves.

No justice for Natalee - No tourist for Aruba.

thanks Snoopy, you make me so proud too!!!! All of you do!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: SunnyinTX on March 11, 2008, 09:10:47 PM
GREAT SHOW DANA!

did anyone get those ladies website????

thanks Anna for emailing it to me!!   ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: ldstlou on March 11, 2008, 09:11:33 PM
ok...going to put my little scout to bed and then go puke!!! lol

Thanks all!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 11, 2008, 09:11:45 PM
Hope you guys are listening to this interview on Dana Pretzer, great interview with these women.

Link to their website:

http://www.womenincrimeink.blogspot.com/






Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 11, 2008, 09:12:32 PM
ok...going to put my little scout to bed and then go puke!!! lol

Thanks all!!

LDSTLOU - Great job on Pretzer, you were wonderful! 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: SunnyinTX on March 11, 2008, 09:14:12 PM
ok...going to put my little scout to bed and then go puke!!! lol

Thanks all!!

hahahaha...sssshhhhhh she is really going to get a beer!! ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: SunnyinTX on March 11, 2008, 09:16:08 PM
Hope you guys are listening to this interview on Dana Pretzer, great interview with these women.

Link to their website:

http://www.womenincrimeink.blogspot.com/

thanks Klaas ::MonkeyDance::  can I beg you a favor ? please change my avatar to the one CBB made for Easter when you get a chance...you know I will screw it up if I try...and then you'll still have to fix it for me ::MonkeyTongue::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: ldstlou on March 11, 2008, 09:19:45 PM
ok...going to put my little scout to bed and then go puke!!! lol

Thanks all!!

hahahaha...sssshhhhhh she is really going to get a beer!! ::MonkeyDance::

lol...wish I had one!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: ldstlou on March 11, 2008, 09:20:29 PM
ok...going to put my little scout to bed and then go puke!!! lol

Thanks all!!

LDSTLOU - Great job on Pretzer, you were wonderful! 

thanks klaas, is my Easter outfit ready too?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Dana on March 11, 2008, 09:21:43 PM
ok...going to put my little scout to bed and then go puke!!! lol

Thanks all!!

you did great, hope everyone enjoyed the show


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: SunnyinTX on March 11, 2008, 09:21:49 PM
ok...going to put my little scout to bed and then go puke!!! lol

Thanks all!!

hahahaha...sssshhhhhh she is really going to get a beer!! ::MonkeyDance::

lol...wish I had one!!!!

I'll buy ya one at our next lunch!!   

Good night to all....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: SunnyinTX on March 11, 2008, 09:22:48 PM
ok...going to put my little scout to bed and then go puke!!! lol

Thanks all!!

you did great, hope everyone enjoyed the show

GOOD SHOW DANA...thanks!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: ldstlou on March 11, 2008, 09:23:24 PM
ok...going to put my little scout to bed and then go puke!!! lol

Thanks all!!

you did great, hope everyone enjoyed the show

loved the Women of Crime Inc!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: SunnyinTX on March 11, 2008, 09:26:59 PM
thanks Klass...... ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 11, 2008, 09:28:37 PM
ok...going to put my little scout to bed and then go puke!!! lol

Thanks all!!

you did great, hope everyone enjoyed the show

Drew Peterson?  Klaas where is my barf icon.  I will save it this time ... I promise.

Lisa ...  ::MonkeyDance::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 11, 2008, 09:29:15 PM
ldstlou - I don't see your Easter outfit yet.  I'm sure CBB will be working on yours next!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Destiny on March 11, 2008, 09:29:32 PM
Segment with Drew Peterson is over.  Dana mostly just had a conversation with Drew Peterson, Dana did not interrogate him. 

thanks Klaas...I can't even stand to hear his voice....I'd love to cut his bxlls off!!!

Oh geeze...I'll trade you 4 marbles... a twinkie from my lunch...and, my roller skates..if...if... if you let me cut just one off...puleeezzzzze...huh...wouldja...huh????

Oh you push a hard bargain....OK...you got one ::MonkeyLaugh::

Awright...hands Sunny 4 chipped marbles...1 stale twinkie...pair old rusty roller skates...and a can of WD40....now, gimme the dull knife!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: ldstlou on March 11, 2008, 09:34:23 PM
Segment with Drew Peterson is over.  Dana mostly just had a conversation with Drew Peterson, Dana did not interrogate him. 

thanks Klaas...I can't even stand to hear his voice....I'd love to cut his bxlls off!!!

Oh geeze...I'll trade you 4 marbles... a twinkie from my lunch...and, my roller skates..if...if... if you let me cut just one off...puleeezzzzze...huh...wouldja...huh????

Oh you push a hard bargain....OK...you got one ::MonkeyLaugh::

Awright...hands Sunny 4 chipped marbles...1 stale twinkie...pair old rusty roller skates...and a can of WD40....now, gimme the dull knife!

roflmao!!!

I'll just wait for my Easter outfit. I know it will be puuurty!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 11, 2008, 09:34:42 PM
Put yourselves in jorans place

No matter what other people may or may not wish upon you
it can never be worse than what you have done to yourself
No one will ever believe a word you say
indifference at the least and hatred at the most is your fate
and the worst part is that nothing you can do will change this
if you confess to clear your conscience you will need proof to support it
but just as there is no proof that you are responsible there is neither proof that you re not
In the eyes of the world you re guilty and all you say beyond this point will be perceived as a lie
in other words do not worry about what others wish upon you
there is no hell worse than the one you ve created for yourself

JE...that's true ...if you are normal...there is nothing normal about jvds.......he has no soul.....how many normal 17yo's have there own apartment, where they, with the approval of their parents, are allowed to have young women come and spend the night,...how old are these young women?? how many are allowed to drink and gamble and even have VIP passes to bars (C&C), how many have father's who accompany them to casino's to gamble and buy them porno, how many normal 17yo's have unlimited amounts of money??...the list goes on and on.....no, there is nothing normal about jvds.......he will harm another young woman....it will happen...unless he is STOPPED


I agree with you both. Joran has created his own hell on Earth. While I am sure he feels no guilt for his crime, his life as it exists has to be miserable. He is a pariah as long as he walks on the face of this planet. He has a big red "M" tatooed on his forehead and will forever be looking over his shoulder because there are always going to be people out there that will want to take him out.

It was said earlier by that psychiatrist person that Joran likes to win. So far he has won the battle of staying out of prison, but he has lost every bit of respect he ever had in the eyes of the world and, as JE so eloquently put it, that is a battle he will never win.

Sunny, he is a died in the wool criminal, he will always be a career criminal, and hopefully the Dutch will see to it that he ends up in prison like a criminal.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 11, 2008, 09:35:34 PM
NO JUSTICE FOR NATALEE - NO TOURISTS FOR ARUBA

WE STAND WITH THE GIRL!


 ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Destiny on March 11, 2008, 09:40:44 PM
Segment with Drew Peterson is over.  Dana mostly just had a conversation with Drew Peterson, Dana did not interrogate him. 

thanks Klaas...I can't even stand to hear his voice....I'd love to cut his bxlls off!!!

Oh geeze...I'll trade you 4 marbles... a twinkie from my lunch...and, my roller skates..if...if... if you let me cut just one off...puleeezzzzze...huh...wouldja...huh????

Oh you push a hard bargain....OK...you got one ::MonkeyLaugh::

Awright...hands Sunny 4 chipped marbles...1 stale twinkie...pair old rusty roller skates...and a can of WD40....now, gimme the dull knife!

roflmao!!!

I'll just wait for my Easter outfit. I know it will be puuurty!!!

Well Ma'am...Yo Sho wuz puuuurty on that thar radio t'nite ...

Hugs to Ya!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: jackb on March 11, 2008, 09:43:06 PM
Hope you guys are listening to this interview on Dana Pretzer, great interview with these women.
 

I listened to it a few.  If it an't monkey business I don't have much time for it.  I will be glad when NH is home and justice is served.  I am going on a real vacation where nothing is on my mind.   j/b


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: jackb on March 11, 2008, 09:44:28 PM
i have  a HUGE headache after reading my emails....

going to make soup for Church for Lenten Services


Keep the faith....

Try being in my shoes

As long as they are not size 14.   LOL   j/b


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: ldstlou on March 11, 2008, 09:44:56 PM
Segment with Drew Peterson is over.  Dana mostly just had a conversation with Drew Peterson, Dana did not interrogate him. 

thanks Klaas...I can't even stand to hear his voice....I'd love to cut his bxlls off!!!

Oh geeze...I'll trade you 4 marbles... a twinkie from my lunch...and, my roller skates..if...if... if you let me cut just one off...puleeezzzzze...huh...wouldja...huh????

Oh you push a hard bargain....OK...you got one ::MonkeyLaugh::

Awright...hands Sunny 4 chipped marbles...1 stale twinkie...pair old rusty roller skates...and a can of WD40....now, gimme the dull knife!

roflmao!!!

I'll just wait for my Easter outfit. I know it will be puuurty!!!

Well Ma'am...Yo Sho wuz puuuurty on that thar radio t'nite ...

Hugs to Ya!!!

thanks so much...I am not kidding when I tell you how nervous I was!!! lol
Glad I couldn't hear myself!! I'll take your word for it!! lol


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: ldstlou on March 11, 2008, 09:45:46 PM
i have  a HUGE headache after reading my emails....

going to make soup for Church for Lenten Services


Keep the faith....

Try being in my shoes

As long as they are not size 14.   LOL   j/b

that was too funny!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: jackb on March 11, 2008, 09:48:50 PM
GREAT SHOW DANA!

did anyone get those ladies website????
?

women in crime?




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 11, 2008, 09:50:26 PM
I also agree with you on them closing the case. A couple of times they have said it was closed only to scramble and say no it is not closed. I am curious though if a private attorney prosecutes the case, do they have the same powers that the prosecutor has?


I think they will do anything not to have to turn over the documents in the case because there is so much that is missing and has been tampered with by the prosecutor and police that they will certainly be exposed.

We are not dealing with rocket scientists here. Bloggers spotted the cover-up the first week. The Arubans just thought they were omnipotent and they are in their own little suburb-sized island but they are nothing but a speck of fly shit on the world stage and have proven themselves to be just that over and over again.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 11, 2008, 10:03:59 PM



I have no faith in Hans Mos. He has ignored the cover-up to date and failed at every task he has performed. I believe he is conducting a low level cover-up of his own with Dop Kruimel in tow. Something about Aruba turns all of the asshole into criminals. Clean investigative, prosecutorial and judicial leadership from Holland is the only way we will get a prosecution in Natalee's case.


Dayhiker, I don't know a lot what Hans Mos has been stating / doing so I can't really give an opinion but from what I've seen and heard of Hans Mos I don't get that impression of him. At least I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt. Especially after I read an article in 'de Volkskrant'.

Hans Mos had a meeting with Peter R. de Vries (when Peter thought he had enough evidence); Peter showed him the confession. Hans Mos suggested to Peter R. de Vries the quotes of Joran weren't good enough for murder because it wasn't clear if Joran knew for certain that Natalee was dead. Peter went back to Holland and did another taping with a lot of questions whether Joran knew for certain if she was dead. He got the quotes Hans Mos needed so Joran is now a suspect of murder.
You can look at this as Hans Mos trying to cover up (OM Aruba knew of the undercover operation before the last taping occured so maybe that could cause trouble in a trial).

But if it was likely to cause a lot of trouble for the case Peter R. de Vries wouldn't have done another taping...the confession was already there and for his televisionshow he didn't need more material. So I'm thinking Hans Mos probably asked Peter R. de Vries to help him...and he did.

[/quote]

I have to agree with dayhiker. I think he started with good intentions but allowed himself to become just another puppet of Aruba's.
What he did to Beth and Dave in inexcuseable. To call them over Thanksgiving and lure them to Aruba with "new evidence" and once again "false hopes" only to sit and interogate them for hours about Natalee's "habits", now how is that representing Justice?
And what did John Q. Kelly say after, there is no new evidence. He is playing the same game now as the rest of them imho. He has been bought and payed for.
And lets face it, for Aruba to prosecute now, they would also have to admit to the cover up by the police and officials from day 1...I don't think they will le that happen.
My hope lies in Beth and a civil case. Sending my prayers to her!!!
[/quote]


Sorry I'm working backwards here. Hell yeah Ldstlou, that stunt by Hans Mos reminded me very much of Karin Jannsen writing our State Department asking if Beth was related to Hitler. Just when you think you've got a Dutch prosecutor with his or her head  together they shit and fall back in it.

What has Hans Mos accomplished so far? Nothing. Where was Hans Mos before Peter and Patrick handed him a confession on a silver platter? Nowhere. What has Hans done with the confession? Not a damn thing.

Hans Mos is struggling with how he can close the case with the hot potato Peter and Patrick handed him. He makes excuses for everything, he has no intention of prosecuting the case. He is a bag of hot air hired to be a bag of hot air.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: private eye on March 11, 2008, 10:06:23 PM
Put yourselves in jorans place

No matter what other people may or may not wish upon you
it can never be worse than what you have done to yourself
No one will ever believe a word you say
indifference at the least and hatred at the most is your fate
and the worst part is that nothing you can do will change this
if you confess to clear your conscience you will need proof to support it
but just as there is no proof that you are responsible there is neither proof that you re not
In the eyes of the world you re guilty and all you say beyond this point will be perceived as a lie
in other words do not worry about what others wish upon you
there is no hell worse than the one you ve created for yourself

JE...that's true ...if you are normal...there is nothing normal about jvds.......he has no soul.....how many normal 17yo's have there own apartment, where they, with the approval of their parents, are allowed to have young women come and spend the night,...how old are these young women?? how many are allowed to drink and gamble and even have VIP passes to bars (C&C), how many have father's who accompany them to casino's to gamble and buy them porno, how many normal 17yo's have unlimited amounts of money??...the list goes on and on.....no, there is nothing normal about jvds.......he will harm another young woman....it will happen...unless he is STOPPED


I agree with you both. Joran has created his own hell on Earth. While I am sure he feels no guilt for his crime, his life as it exists has to be miserable. He is a pariah as long as he walks on the face of this planet. He has a big red "M" tatooed on his forehead and will forever be looking over his shoulder because there are always going to be people out there that will want to take him out.

It was said earlier by that psychiatrist person that Joran likes to win. So far he has won the battle of staying out of prison, but he has lost every bit of respect he ever had in the eyes of the world and, as JE so eloquently put it, that is a battle he will never win.

Sunny, he is a died in the wool criminal, he will always be a career criminal, and hopefully the Dutch will see to it that he ends up in prison like a criminal.


He is a product of his parents, and he will be stopped. One way or another.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Kat_Gram on March 11, 2008, 10:08:28 PM
Hope you guys are listening to this interview on Dana Pretzer, great interview with these women.
 

I listened to it a few.  If it an't monkey business I don't have much time for it.  I will be glad when NH is home and justice is served.  I am going on a real vacation where nothing is on my mind.   j/b
You have a good one ! !  I go to work where nothing is on my mind LOL..  ( Feds 'ya know, we just sit on our ample azzes all day and do nada, except brush our blonde hair ! )
Seriously, I am taking some time off later into the spring also.
This case has been tough on alot of people. So much bs from Aruba, Holland and Joran. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: mrs. red on March 11, 2008, 10:20:39 PM
i have  a HUGE headache after reading my emails....

going to make soup for Church for Lenten Services


Keep the faith....


OMG... Klaas, are you kidding?  i could never fill your shoes... I don't have the patience you do.... Lord, we would all be banned if I knew how.... there would be like 3 monkeys.

Try being in my shoes

As long as they are not size 14.   LOL   j/b

that was too funny!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: mrs. red on March 11, 2008, 10:22:38 PM
I messed that up big time...

and I am only kidding about 3 monkeys... it was a pun


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 11, 2008, 10:24:42 PM
I messed that up big time...

and I am only kidding about 3 monkeys... it was a pun

You need your Easter outfit.  Want me to help you with it?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: mrs. red on March 11, 2008, 10:27:15 PM
I messed that up big time...

and I am only kidding about 3 monkeys... it was a pun

You need your Easter outfit.  Want me to help you with it?

yes please!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: mrs. red on March 11, 2008, 10:31:09 PM
Thanks!  I didn't mean to stop the conversation.... I save Dana's shows for when I am at work... with my headphones and then I really get to focus!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 11, 2008, 10:34:53 PM
Mrs. Red - you didn't stop the conversation, there's just no news in the case today.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: mrs. red on March 11, 2008, 10:36:35 PM
Mrs. Red - you didn't stop the conversation, there's just no news in the case today.

I see... unfortunately they don't seem like they get it yet in Aruba and refuse to do the right thing....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: mrs. red on March 11, 2008, 10:38:22 PM
I am out of here...

still standing with the girl and keeping the faith...but I have a book to finish for Chruch group... and the dang soup!

Nite y'all....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Destiny on March 11, 2008, 10:41:25 PM
I am out of here...

still standing with the girl and keeping the faith...but I have a book to finish for Chruch group... and the dang soup!

Nite y'all....

Nite Mrs. Red...you go stir your pot...we'll keep stirring this one...Fetching Easter Outfit!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: San on March 11, 2008, 10:47:41 PM
I am out of here...

still standing with the girl and keeping the faith...but I have a book to finish for Chruch group... and the dang soup!

Nite y'all....

Nite mrs. red.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Red on March 11, 2008, 10:58:04 PM
One thing is for certain. Aruba knows it is in a catch 22.

They are damned if they do and damed if they don't. They are even damned if they do and the suspects are not convicted.

They know that they are going to have to do something regarding prosecuting the Natalee case as they have all but admitted their tourism is floundering and has not hit rock bottom yet.

As the the famous line from the Maltese Falcon goes ... someone must take the fall.

Eventually there will be justice or Aruba will have no tourism ... they can pick their poison.

As we have always wanted answers for this family and justice ... hmm ... maybe that's my agenda.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: wreck on March 11, 2008, 11:15:03 PM
One thing is for certain. Aruba knows it is in a catch 22.

They are damned if they do and damed if they don't. They are even damned if they do and the suspects are not convicted.

They know that they are going to have to do something regarding prosecuting the Natalee case as they have all but admitted their tourism is floundering and has not hit rock bottom yet.

As the the famous line from the Maltese Falcon goes ... someone must take the fall.

Eventually there will be justice or Aruba will have no tourism ... they can pick their poison.

As we have always wanted answers for this family and justice ... hmm ... maybe that's my agenda.
To me -- the biggest puzzler has always been that Aruba would rather "win" the the skirmish and prove they are "safe" than to actually do what is moral and right. I can only surmize this is true because those with the power to do what is "right and moral" are so far deep in it themselves -- they have no choice.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on March 11, 2008, 11:20:28 PM

I'll try not to laugh, LOL  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Klaas, I like your new avatar.  It begs the question, what came first, the monkey or the egg?   \                                                              ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 11, 2008, 11:22:31 PM

I'll try not to laugh, LOL  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Klaas, I like your new avatar.  It begs the question, what came first, the monkey or the egg?   \                                                              ::MonkeyWink::

 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Red on March 11, 2008, 11:35:06 PM
One thing is for certain. Aruba knows it is in a catch 22.

They are damned if they do and damed if they don't. They are even damned if they do and the suspects are not convicted.

They know that they are going to have to do something regarding prosecuting the Natalee case as they have all but admitted their tourism is floundering and has not hit rock bottom yet.

As the the famous line from the Maltese Falcon goes ... someone must take the fall.

Eventually there will be justice or Aruba will have no tourism ... they can pick their poison.

As we have always wanted answers for this family and justice ... hmm ... maybe that's my agenda.
To me -- the biggest puzzler has always been that Aruba would rather "win" the the skirmish and prove they are "safe" than to actually do what is moral and right. I can only surmize this is true because those with the power to do what is "right and moral" are so far deep in it themselves -- they have no choice.

I have long given up that they would ever do what was morally right or correct. Actually that went by the board pretty soon into Natalee's disappearance. Anything thing  that Aruba does for this case and prosecution will be because they have to for their tourism sake.

What meager increases they have shown in tourism that still are way below pre-Natalee missing numbers are disastrous when one factors in the fact that Aruba had to slash their rates by some 50-60% to even get any one to go. No one has to belong to the math club to figure out the $'s are way down.

Ultimately they will have no choice. Every idea they have had has been wrong. They thought the case would go away, it did not. They thought we would go away ... we did not.

To those that have asked about an "agenda" and you know exactly who I am referring to ... maybe that's been our agenda here ... answers for Dave & Beth and Justice for Natalee.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: hotping on March 11, 2008, 11:35:25 PM

I'll try not to laugh, LOL  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Klaas, I like your new avatar.  It begs the question, what came first, the monkey or the egg?   \                                                              ::MonkeyWink::
BH You have a Great Sense of Humor! LOL!  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on March 11, 2008, 11:36:13 PM
i have  a HUGE headache after reading my emails....

going to make soup for Church for Lenten Services


Keep the faith....

Try being in my shoes

There is no one who could fill your shoes!!!

                 (http://i78.photobucket.com/albums/j120/Bearlyhere/monkeyshoes.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 11, 2008, 11:36:39 PM
Dana Pretzer show with Lisa talking about the St. Louis Travel Show boycott - thanks to Carpe:


http://www.youtube.com/v/RUZjhn1zsBs&hl=en


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: hotping on March 11, 2008, 11:48:54 PM
Thank You Everyone for bringing this portion of Dana's Show forward for easy listening....I actually missed part of it due to bad timing by My Son who called....but I just want to say that Lisa You did a Fantastic job and Dana and You both Kidded Ass...Thanks Carpe and Klaas.....All Your Work is Very Much Appreciated!  ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on March 11, 2008, 11:49:06 PM
Hope you guys are listening to this interview on Dana Pretzer, great interview with these women.

Link to their website:

http://www.womenincrimeink.blogspot.com/



Lisa up next! ::MonkeyHaHa::

Nice sight!  Thanks, Klaas!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 11, 2008, 11:49:17 PM
i have  a HUGE headache after reading my emails....

going to make soup for Church for Lenten Services


Keep the faith....

Try being in my shoes

There is no one who could fill your shoes!!!

                 (http://i78.photobucket.com/albums/j120/Bearlyhere/monkeyshoes.jpg)

Those are similar to mine  ::MonkeyHaHa::

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/monkeyslip1.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Magnolia on March 11, 2008, 11:50:43 PM
Great job Lisa! ::MonkeyDance::

You sound like a professional spokesperson.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 11, 2008, 11:52:47 PM
Great job Lisa! ::MonkeyDance::

You sound like a professional spokesperson.

She sounded wonderful didn't she?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Destiny on March 12, 2008, 12:01:06 AM
Klaas...if you have time...would you please send my email addy to *******?  TIA....Destiny


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Magnolia on March 12, 2008, 12:02:24 AM
Glenda aka Renfro is such a load.

She posted at RU:

Glenda Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 10:34 pm   
Gov't Inspectors at the Entrance of every Casino

This is an absolute fact. Everyone who says it is not true has an agenda to discredit all information that comes from Aruba.

The question is why? 
========================================================
So, how did Joran get in to gamble so often?
Isn't there another rule that says a redident of Aruba can only
frequent a casino so many days per month.  That rule doesn't seem to
be enforced either.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Destiny on March 12, 2008, 12:03:46 AM
Great job Lisa! ::MonkeyDance::

You sound like a professional spokesperson.

She sounded wonderful didn't she?

Yes She did!  I've done a lot of radio/TV work in my past...I know that queasy feeling you get before a broadcast...She was Spectacular!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 12, 2008, 12:04:42 AM
Klaas...if you have time...would you please send my email addy to *******?  TIA....Destiny

Done  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Destiny on March 12, 2008, 12:08:31 AM
Glenda aka Renfro is such a load.

She posted at RU:

Glenda Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 10:34 pm   
Gov't Inspectors at the Entrance of every Casino

This is an absolute fact. Everyone who says it is not true has an agenda to discredit all information that comes from Aruba.

The question is why? 
========================================================
So, how did Joran get in to gamble so often?
Isn't there another rule that says a redident of Aruba can only
frequent a casino so many days per month.  That rule doesn't seem to
be enforced either.


Glenda...You are worn out...used up...worthless...your flapping gums must be bleeding by now...just give it up.  How afraid you must be...your paycheck is drying up...just like you...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Destiny on March 12, 2008, 12:09:42 AM
Klaas...if you have time...would you please send my email addy to *******?  TIA....Destiny

Done  ::MonkeyWink::

TY Sweetums...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on March 12, 2008, 12:09:55 AM
Dana Pretzer show with Lisa talking about the St. Louis Travel Show boycott - thanks to Carpe:


http://www.youtube.com/v/RUZjhn1zsBs&hl=en

Great job, Lisa.  If that is what you are like when you are nervous, God help the person who picks a battle of the wits with you when you are completely calm.

 ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on March 12, 2008, 12:12:31 AM
i have  a HUGE headache after reading my emails....

going to make soup for Church for Lenten Services


Keep the faith....

Try being in my shoes

There is no one who could fill your shoes!!!

                 (http://i78.photobucket.com/albums/j120/Bearlyhere/monkeyshoes.jpg)

Those are similar to mine  ::MonkeyHaHa::

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/monkeyslip1.gif)

 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::

Don't look now, but I think your shoes are flirting with mine!   ::MonkeyShocked::

 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyTongue::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 12, 2008, 12:13:05 AM
Glenda aka Renfro is such a load.

She posted at RU:

Glenda Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 10:34 pm   
Gov't Inspectors at the Entrance of every Casino

This is an absolute fact. Everyone who says it is not true has an agenda to discredit all information that comes from Aruba.

The question is why? 
========================================================
So, how did Joran get in to gamble so often?
Isn't there another rule that says a redident of Aruba can only
frequent a casino so many days per month.  That rule doesn't seem to
be enforced either.



The protection of the tourist dollar that feeds an underground economy throughout the Carribean appears to have been the motivation behind the coverup in the Natalee Holloway case from the getgo.

Justice for Natalee Holloway would have demanded ... not just accountability from Joran or Paulus for their roles but ... also the the Excelsior Casino and Carlos and Charlies where ...  as John Q. Kelly stated ... the entire chain of events that resulted in the demise of an 18 year old American citizen would never have happened if an underage Joran van der Sloot had not been allowed on the premises to gamble and drink.

At 17 years of age ... could it be that Joran van der Sloot was already an active contributor to that underground economy ... the underground economy that encompasses gambling ... drugs ... pornography.  Could it be that this is the reason that those "government inspectors" who Julia Renfro refers to turned a blind eye.

Janet

++++++++++++


CARLOS 'N CHARLIES

Joran van der Sloot
Suspect Statement
June 9, 2005


After that we drove straight to Carlos & Charlies. Deepak was the driver but I cannot remember now who was sitting beside him. I do not remember now if it was Satish or me. I estimate that we arrived at Carlos & Charlies between 00.15 and 00.30 hours. Deepak parked his car on the parking lot behind Carlos & Charlies and after that we walked into the building of Carlos & Charlies. I don't have to pay because I have a VIP pass. With my VIP pass Deepak and Satish were also allowed in.

To your question as to who gave me the VIP pass to Carlos & Charlies, I answer you that I got it through the office of Carlos & Charlies. I do not remember with the help of who I got the VIP pass. I got to Carlos & Charlies about one to three times a week.


EXCELSIOR CASINO

Beth Holloway
LOVING NATALEE


Page 39 - Following our brief conversation, we all walk immediately to the fron desk to ask about someone named Joran who is staying in the hotel and plays in the casino here.  The Holiday Inn night manager, Brenda, knows him by name.  "Oh! yes ... yes ... Joran.  He gambles in the Excelsior Casino here.  He likes to prey on young female tourists.  Especially the blonds.  He is tall.  Good-looking boy.  Like a Dutch marine."  My mouth drops wide open.  "Where is he from?" I ask her.  She replies.  "He lives in Aruba."  I stutter.  "He's ... he's not a tourist just here for the summer?"  "Non, non," she says.

It takes a few moments to absorb this information.  The supposed tourist who befriended some of Natalee's classmates and who told them he was staying at their hotel lied tothem.  He isn't a tourist.  He isn't staying here.


RADISSON CASINO

Deepak Kalpoe
Suspect Statement
June 13, 2005


Andre asked me to come inside. I did go inside. I did not play, but did look at the cards of Joran and Guido.

At some given moment in time a tourist who was sitting at Joran's table got angry. The tourist thought that we were looking at the cards of other players and signaling/deciding for Joran when he should play or not. It lead to a disagreement between Joran and the tourist. The manager of the Radisson Casino came over and everything calmed down. I drank about four "whisky coke" gedronken in the Radisson Casino. I now that Joran drank more because the waiters were constantly bringing him drinks.   I am not sure .what he was drinking. His drinks were of a yellow colour. I think it was “whisky soda" or 'Whisky water".


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on March 12, 2008, 12:18:56 AM
Glenda aka Renfro is such a load.

She posted at RU:

Glenda Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 10:34 pm   
Gov't Inspectors at the Entrance of every Casino

This is an absolute fact. Everyone who says it is not true has an agenda to discredit all information that comes from Aruba.

The question is why? 
========================================================
So, how did Joran get in to gamble so often?
Isn't there another rule that says a redident of Aruba can only
frequent a casino so many days per month.  That rule doesn't seem to
be enforced either.


Glenda,

Thanks for the clarification.  It was a pleasant surprise to see that you are viewing things the same as the monkeys.  In other words, the government inspectors at the entrance of every casino are not doing their jobs.  They let children in to drink and gamble.  What else of importance are they missing?  Maybe you will pass that on next.  Looking forward to hearing from you. 

Thanks,
BH


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 12, 2008, 12:24:20 AM
Good Night Monkeys

Janet
9:30 PM


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 12, 2008, 12:25:28 AM
Glenda aka Renfro is such a load.

She posted at RU:

Glenda Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 10:34 pm   
Gov't Inspectors at the Entrance of every Casino

This is an absolute fact. Everyone who says it is not true has an agenda to discredit all information that comes from Aruba.

The question is why? 
========================================================
So, how did Joran get in to gamble so often?
Isn't there another rule that says a redident of Aruba can only
frequent a casino so many days per month.  That rule doesn't seem to
be enforced either.


Sure Glenda, just like these inspectors at this entrance.  Maybe they are "invisible inspectors"  ::MonkeyWink::

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/ABC11-1.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 12, 2008, 12:26:03 AM
Good Night Monkeys

Janet
9:30 PM

Nite Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Destiny on March 12, 2008, 12:26:46 AM
Glenda aka Renfro is such a load.

She posted at RU:

Glenda Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 10:34 pm   
Gov't Inspectors at the Entrance of every Casino

This is an absolute fact. Everyone who says it is not true has an agenda to discredit all information that comes from Aruba.

The question is why? 
========================================================
So, how did Joran get in to gamble so often?
Isn't there another rule that says a redident of Aruba can only
frequent a casino so many days per month.  That rule doesn't seem to
be enforced either.



The protection of the tourist dollar that feeds an underground economy throughout the Carribean appears to have been the motivation behind the coverup in the Natalee Holloway case from the getgo.

Justice for Natalee Holloway would have demanded ... not just accountability from Joran or Paulus for their roles but ... also the the Excelsior Casino and Carlos and Charlies where ...  as John Q. Kelly stated ... the entire chain of events that resulted in the demise of an 18 year old American citizen would never have happened if an underage Joran van der Sloot had not been allowed on the premises to gamble and drink.

At 17 years of age ... could it be that Joran van der Sloot was already an active contributor to that underground economy ... the underground economy that encompasses gambling ... drugs ... pornography.  Could it be that this is the reason that those "government inspectors" who Julia Renfro refers to turned a blind eye.

Janet

++++++++++++


CARLOS 'N CHARLIES

Joran van der Sloot
Suspect Statement
June 9, 2005


After that we drove straight to Carlos & Charlies. Deepak was the driver but I cannot remember now who was sitting beside him. I do not remember now if it was Satish or me. I estimate that we arrived at Carlos & Charlies between 00.15 and 00.30 hours. Deepak parked his car on the parking lot behind Carlos & Charlies and after that we walked into the building of Carlos & Charlies. I don't have to pay because I have a VIP pass. With my VIP pass Deepak and Satish were also allowed in.

To your question as to who gave me the VIP pass to Carlos & Charlies, I answer you that I got it through the office of Carlos & Charlies. I do not remember with the help of who I got the VIP pass. I got to Carlos & Charlies about one to three times a week.


EXCELSIOR CASINO

Beth Holloway
LOVING NATALEE


Page 39 - Following our brief conversation, we all walk immediately to the fron desk to ask about someone named Joran who is staying in the hotel and plays in the casino here.  The Holiday Inn night manager, Brenda, knows him by name.  "Oh! yes ... yes ... Joran.  He gambles in the Excelsior Casino here.  He likes to prey on young female tourists.  Especially the blonds.  He is tall.  Good-looking boy.  Like a Dutch marine."  My mouth drops wide open.  "Where is he from?" I ask her.  She replies.  "He lives in Aruba."  I stutter.  "He's ... he's not a tourist just here for the summer?"  "Non, non," she says.

It takes a few moments to absorb this information.  The supposed tourist who befriended some of Natalee's classmates and who told them he was staying at their hotel lied tothem.  He isn't a tourist.  He isn't staying here.


RADISSON CASINO

Deepak Kalpoe
Suspect Statement
June 13, 2005


Andre asked me to come inside. I did go inside. I did not play, but did look at the cards of Joran and Guido.

At some given moment in time a tourist who was sitting at Joran's table got angry. The tourist thought that we were looking at the cards of other players and signaling/deciding for Joran when he should play or not. It lead to a disagreement between Joran and the tourist. The manager of the Radisson Casino came over and everything calmed down. I drank about four "whisky coke" gedronken in the Radisson Casino. I now that Joran drank more because the waiters were constantly bringing him drinks.   I am not sure .what he was drinking. His drinks were of a yellow colour. I think it was “whisky soda" or 'Whisky water".

Janet How very right you are....when there are no morals to pass down...none are passed down...a total infrastructure of gain, based on the concept of...*no* morals....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on March 12, 2008, 12:31:19 AM
Good Night Monkeys

Janet
9:30 PM

Nite, Janet!

    ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: texasmom on March 12, 2008, 12:32:35 AM
Good Night Monkeys

Janet
9:30 PM

Goodnight, Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Destiny on March 12, 2008, 12:34:47 AM
Good Night Monkeys

Janet
9:30 PM

Goodnight, Janet

Piggy-backing on TM...Nite Janet...pawn to Q4....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Magnolia on March 12, 2008, 12:38:17 AM
Good Night Monkeys

Janet
9:30 PM

Good Night, Janet.
The information that you come up with at a moments notice
never ceases to amaze me.  Thank you.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Destiny on March 12, 2008, 12:42:02 AM
Glenda aka Renfro is such a load.

She posted at RU:

Glenda Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 10:34 pm   
Gov't Inspectors at the Entrance of every Casino

This is an absolute fact. Everyone who says it is not true has an agenda to discredit all information that comes from Aruba.

The question is why? 
========================================================
So, how did Joran get in to gamble so often?
Isn't there another rule that says a redident of Aruba can only
frequent a casino so many days per month.  That rule doesn't seem to
be enforced either.


Sure Glenda, just like these inspectors at this entrance.  Maybe they are "invisible inspectors"  ::MonkeyWink::

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/ABC11-1.jpg)

Wow Klaas...haven't seen that one in awhile...thanks for refreshing my memory...and Glenda's...LOL


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Magnolia on March 12, 2008, 12:46:34 AM
What kind of shoes does Joran have on as he is coming through
the door of the casino?  (I know it has probably been checked before)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 12, 2008, 12:47:30 AM
What kind of shoes does Joran have on as he is coming through
the door of the casino?  (I know it has probably been checked before)

Really hard to tell when you enlarge it but it looks like just plain white tennis shoes.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Magnolia on March 12, 2008, 12:50:57 AM
What kind of shoes does Joran have on as he is coming through
the door of the casino?  (I know it has probably been checked before)

Really hard to tell when you enlarge it but it looks like just plain white tennis shoes.

Well, they look like size 10 1/2 to me. ::MonkeyTongue::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: hotping on March 12, 2008, 12:52:23 AM
What kind of shoes does Joran have on as he is coming through
the door of the casino?  (I know it has probably been checked before)
K Swiss..One size 10 the other size 14..klip klop klip klop!  ::MonkeyShocked::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 12, 2008, 12:59:15 AM
Looks like Joran was wearing this or something very similar when he was at the Casino that night (I used this pic to test the size of his shoe to his forearm, lol )


(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/joranshoeforearm.jpg)

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/ABC11-1.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Destiny on March 12, 2008, 01:07:32 AM
Looks like Joran was wearing this or something very similar when he was at the Casino that night (I used this pic to test the size of his shoe to his forearm, lol )


(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/joranshoeforearm.jpg)

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/ABC11-1.jpg)

Glenda...Yoo-Hooo...see what Klaas has posted?...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: texasmom on March 12, 2008, 01:15:05 AM
Glenda aka Renfro is such a load.

She posted at RU:

Glenda Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 10:34 pm   
Gov't Inspectors at the Entrance of every Casino

This is an absolute fact. Everyone who says it is not true has an agenda to discredit all information that comes from Aruba.

The question is why? 
========================================================
So, how did Joran get in to gamble so often?
Isn't there another rule that says a redident of Aruba can only
frequent a casino so many days per month.  That rule doesn't seem to
be enforced either.


Sure Glenda, just like these inspectors at this entrance.  Maybe they are "invisible inspectors"   ::MonkeyWink::

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/ABC11-1.jpg)

Wow Klaas...haven't seen that one in awhile...thanks for refreshing my memory...and Glenda's...LOL

You're right Glenda Julia, WE HAVE AN AGENDA; IT'S CALLED TRUTH, AND JUSTICE.. ::MonkeyDance:: ..DO YOU FEEL THE WALLS OF BABYLON SHAKING GLENDA JULIA?  THEY'RE GOING DOWN, ALL OF THEM.....NO MORE INFORMATION LIES FROM ARUBA ARE NECESSARY!. ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 12, 2008, 01:25:24 AM
 ::MonkeyHaHa:: TM


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: hotping on March 12, 2008, 01:29:02 AM
Great Post TM!  ::MonkeyWink:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Finbar on March 12, 2008, 01:29:47 AM
Well, I just find even referring to Beth as a suspect very offensive.

I thought the burden of proof for being labeled a suspect was, according to the lovely and gracious Arleen, STRONG suspicion or reason to suspect thus and so.

Thinking it was an insurance scam because that was the false claim  they told before about Max DeVries would not qualify as reason for strong suspicion since that turned out not to be true at all.

That leaves the psychics and I do have a very hard time believing that anyone really takes them seriously.  One word against another.  But it did come from two of the government Ministers that this should be investigated so perhaps that is where this comes from?

Just more for Bram to work with, I think.  Reflects more on the mindset of the Ministers than on Beth, imo.

.

ag & simian were the two I remember posting about insurance scams.
 ::MonkeyCool::

Fin



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 12, 2008, 01:33:16 AM
Well, I just find even referring to Beth as a suspect very offensive.

I thought the burden of proof for being labeled a suspect was, according to the lovely and gracious Arleen, STRONG suspicion or reason to suspect thus and so.

Thinking it was an insurance scam because that was the false claim  they told before about Max DeVries would not qualify as reason for strong suspicion since that turned out not to be true at all.

That leaves the psychics and I do have a very hard time believing that anyone really takes them seriously.  One word against another.  But it did come from two of the government Ministers that this should be investigated so perhaps that is where this comes from?

Just more for Bram to work with, I think.  Reflects more on the mindset of the Ministers than on Beth, imo.

.

ag & simian were the two I remember posting about insurance scams.
 ::MonkeyCool::

Fin



I'm sure the insurance scam was the first disinformation they thought of, afterall they had already used it on Max Devries.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Finbar on March 12, 2008, 01:57:55 AM
Yes. And the poster at RWV stating this was... scubajap.

http://www.riehlworldview.com/carnivorous_conservative/2005/08/willard_bud_lar.html

And also reports of sightings of him in Brazil.



Odd. All this pointing away from J2K by certain posters....

Now, all we have to decipher is if they are helping or misleading.


Fin


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: texasmom on March 12, 2008, 02:22:29 AM
Goodnight everyone!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Finbar on March 12, 2008, 02:22:45 AM
Something else odd. All these posters stating that a body thrown in the ocean would either wash back upon the shores or S.A..

Max never washed up.


Fin


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: hotping on March 12, 2008, 02:28:07 AM
Good Night TM!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: texasmom on March 12, 2008, 02:43:30 AM
Something else odd. All these posters stating that a body thrown in the ocean would either wash back upon the shores or S.A..

Max never washed up.


Fin

I found that odd too, Fin.
That story just didn't wash with me, felt like there's more to it.  JMO

goodnight for real this time!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on March 12, 2008, 04:55:51 AM
Glenda aka Renfro is such a load.

She posted at RU:

Glenda Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 10:34 pm   
Gov't Inspectors at the Entrance of every Casino

This is an absolute fact. Everyone who says it is not true has an agenda to discredit all information that comes from Aruba.

The question is why? 
========================================================
So, how did Joran get in to gamble so often?
Isn't there another rule that says a redident of Aruba can only
frequent a casino so many days per month.  That rule doesn't seem to
be enforced either.


Sure Glenda, just like these inspectors at this entrance.  Maybe they are "invisible inspectors"  ::MonkeyWink::

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/ABC11-1.jpg)
I have always wondered why joran is shown walking into the casino alone.....didn't paulus go to the casino with joran that night?Of course this could be a video clip from ANY night on aruba.Lord knows joran went there a lot and waiters scrambled to serve non stop drinks to the underaged goon.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on March 12, 2008, 07:22:05 AM
Good morning, Monkeys and Guests.

Walking out on tiptoes as not to wake up sleeping monkeys.....shhh...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Tater on March 12, 2008, 07:48:38 AM
Good morning, Monkeys and Guests.

Walking out on tiptoes as not to wake up sleeping monkeys.....shhh...

Sneaks quietly behind you hoping we are headed for the toaster.. :smt115


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 12, 2008, 08:26:28 AM
Dana Pretzer show with Lisa talking about the St. Louis Travel Show boycott - thanks to Carpe:


http://www.youtube.com/v/RUZjhn1zsBs&hl=en


GREAT INTERVIEW AND LISA YOU DID KICK ASS!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on March 12, 2008, 08:28:20 AM
Good morning, Monkeys and Guests.

Walking out on tiptoes as not to wake up sleeping monkeys.....shhh...

Sneaks quietly behind you hoping we are headed for the toaster.. :smt115

 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::

Do you want jam with that?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 12, 2008, 08:28:35 AM

You're right Glenda Julia, WE HAVE AN AGENDA; IT'S CALLED TRUTH, AND JUSTICE.. ::MonkeyDance:: ..DO YOU FEEL THE WALLS OF BABYLON SHAKING GLENDA JULIA?  THEY'RE GOING DOWN, ALL OF THEM.....NO MORE INFORMATION LIES FROM ARUBA ARE NECESSARY!. ::MonkeyCool::


GREAT POST TM!   ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 12, 2008, 08:35:27 AM
Glenda aka Renfro is such a load.

She posted at RU:

Glenda Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 10:34 pm   
Gov't Inspectors at the Entrance of every Casino

This is an absolute fact. Everyone who says it is not true has an agenda to discredit all information that comes from Aruba.

The question is why? 
========================================================
So, how did Joran get in to gamble so often?
Isn't there another rule that says a redident of Aruba can only
frequent a casino so many days per month.  That rule doesn't seem to
be enforced either.



What kind of excuse is this anyway? Even if there are Inspectors at the door they aren't enforcing the laws of Aruba so that makes them just as corrupt as the rest of the government. If they were doing their job Joran would never have been in the casinos in the first place.

He bounced from one casino to the next like a kid in a sandpile with no one from the Aruba government ever stopping him. What good are laws if they are not enforced or totally ignored by the Dutch elite on Aruba?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Tater on March 12, 2008, 08:44:30 AM
Good morning, Monkeys and Guests.

Walking out on tiptoes as not to wake up sleeping monkeys.....shhh...

Sneaks quietly behind you hoping we are headed for the toaster.. :smt115

 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::

Do you want jam with that?

 :chef: Yes please....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on March 12, 2008, 08:58:23 AM
Quote from: Dayhiker
snipped...
I think they will do anything not to have to turn over the documents in the case because there is so much that is missing and has been tampered with by the prosecutor and police that they will certainly be exposed.~~~~~~~~~

BINGO--Day!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on March 12, 2008, 09:11:00 AM
Great job Lisa! ::MonkeyDance::

You sound like a professional spokesperson.

She sounded wonderful didn't she?


Couldn't listen last night, thanks for the replay! SHE DID!! I thought I was listening to Wendy Murphy there for a minute! LOL! GO LISA!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Lala'sMom on March 12, 2008, 09:44:44 AM
SHHHHH!  Let's let Klaas sleep in this morning... ::MonkeyWink::


Coffee anyone?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on March 12, 2008, 09:56:38 AM
Great job Lisa! ::MonkeyDance::

You sound like a professional spokesperson.

She sounded wonderful didn't she?


Couldn't listen last night, thanks for the replay! SHE DID!! I thought I was listening to Wendy Murphy there for a minute! LOL! GO LISA!

I wasn't able to listen last night, either.  My thoughts, exactly....Lisa did a wonderful job...so well spoken..... :smt038 :smt038 :smt038  Dana said it all...she kicked azz.  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 12, 2008, 11:21:07 AM
Glenda aka Renfro is such a load.

She posted at RU:

Glenda Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 10:34 pm   
Gov't Inspectors at the Entrance of every Casino

This is an absolute fact. Everyone who says it is not true has an agenda to discredit all information that comes from Aruba.

<snipped>


You're right Glenda Julia, WE HAVE AN AGENDA; IT'S CALLED TRUTH, AND JUSTICE.. ::MonkeyDance:: ..DO YOU FEEL THE WALLS OF BABYLON SHAKING GLENDA JULIA?  THEY'RE GOING DOWN, ALL OF THEM.....NO MORE INFORMATION LIES FROM ARUBA ARE NECESSARY!. ::MonkeyCool::

Way to go Texasmom!!

 ::MonkeyDance::


Good Morning Monkeys.

Janet
8:30 AM


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: snoopy on March 12, 2008, 11:21:15 AM

Klaas HELP 

Could you please edit my post in monkey musing?  Could you take out the tbaker email address?  I have no idea where that came from. lol

 ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

 ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: GabbyG on March 12, 2008, 11:23:54 AM
Hey Monkeys, Hi!!
One of our posters has had a line across the bottom of her posts that said something like...
Avoid Aruba as if your life depends on it....it Does!!

I would like to ask that poster if I could use her comment on a sign I want to make for the Houston Travel Show. I think it was Sharon but Im not sure about that. Please email me at njackson1245@neto.com and let me know if it's ok to use that, whoever had it.
Thanks much!
Wishing a great day for all our Monkeys!

I Stand With The Girl


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 12, 2008, 11:24:46 AM
SHHHHH!  Let's let Klaas sleep in this morning... ::MonkeyWink::


Coffee anyone?

That would be very nice.  Strong black caffeinated please.  The sleepytime cobwebs need to clear and ... that anticipated buzz ... then Tamikosmom is ready to go.

 ::MonkeyDance::

KLAAS ... WAKE UP!!

 ::MonkeyShocked::

Janet




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: snoopy on March 12, 2008, 11:27:25 AM

Thank you Klaas!!   ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on March 12, 2008, 11:32:29 AM
Interesting Court News in 24ora today.
http://www.24ora.com/content/blogcategory/24/29/

The first 3 dated 3-11 ...all have comments in their respective places and some comments seem to compare OJ and Joran to these cases....

I have not done a full rough tranny yet, but it is interesting, indeed.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: GabbyG on March 12, 2008, 11:33:05 AM
Just a reminder that we need Monkeys for the Houston Travel Show, if interested please post in the Houston Travel Show thread!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 12, 2008, 11:45:42 AM
http://news.yahoo.com:80/s/nm/20080311/bs_nm/valero_npra_dc_4

Valero may sell U.S. plants in hard refinery times By Bernie Woodall and Rebekah Kebede
Tue Mar 11, 7:07 PM ET
 

Top U.S. refining company Valero Energy Corp (VLO.N) said on Tuesday it is considering selling nearly a third of its North American refineries amid a U.S. economic slowdown that is crimping fuel demand, and that it is exploring new projects in the Middle East and Asia.

The outlook marks a major shift in Valero's strategy after a decade of sterling profits, acquisitions and expansions transformed the San Antonio-based company from small independent refiner into a behemoth.

Valero Chief Executive Bill Klesse, speaking at the National Petrochemical and Refiners Association meeting, said the company is close to selling refineries in Aruba, Memphis, Tennessee, and Krotz Springs, Louisiana, and has received interest from potential buyers for two other plants.

Klesse did not say what companies were vying for the plants, which account for 840,000 barrels per day of the company's 3.1 million bpd capacity.

But Zurich-listed Petroplus (PPHH.VX) announced in late February it partnered with two private equity firms to buy U.S. refineries, raising some speculation in the oil industry that it could be one of the bidders.

Brazilian state oil company Petrobras (PETR4.SA)(PBR.N) has also said it is eyeing opportunities to buy refineries.

Klesse said that at the same time, Valero is exploring potential growth in the Middle East and Asia, where demand for fuel has been robust.

"We have looked in the last six months at opportunities in the Middle East and we looked at a situation in Asia," said Klesse. "Nothing is imminent."

Subsidized prices and a weakening U.S. dollar have helped keep fuel demand high in many consuming nations, he said.

U.S. 'GOLDEN AGE' OVER

After a stretch of soaring profits that Valero once dubbed "the golden age" of refining, the sector in the United States has faced a sharp downturn.

Surging crude oil prices, softening demand growth, tough environmental regulations and rising costs for materials and labor have cut into margins and led U.S. refiners to slow fuel production and scrap more than a half a million barrels per day in expansion plans in recent months.

Klesse said he expects prices of crude oil, the primary feedstock in fuel production, to continue to hold strong despite weaker U.S. demand growth for gasoline. Crude oil hit a new peak near $110 a barrel on Tuesday.

He added that poor margins, particularly in the Midwest, had led the company to slow some gasoline production even as pump prices hit new peaks.

"Oil prices are going to stay high," Klesse said. "I'd like to think not $110. The world economy has shown it can handle these high prices."

Klesse said the United States may need to raise tariffs on imported gasoline to protect domestic refiners against "dumping" from foreign suppliers.

Average regular gasoline prices hit an all-time high of $3.227 per gallon Tuesday, according to travel group AAA.

OFF THE BOOKS

When Valero began a buying spree in 1997, it had only one refinery. That number ballooned to 18 until the middle of last year when it sold off a plant in Ohio. If it sells the five plants Klesse indicated were on the block, it will have cut the number of its plants by nearly a third.

Klesse said it would likely sell its plants in Aruba, Memphis and Krotz Springs by the end of 2008.

"There is no question that I know the values are good for these (three) refineries for our shareholders," Klesse said. "It's more driven by the fact that Valero is not going to invest in these plants and take them to the next level."

He added Valero was also entertaining interest in two other plants in Ardmore, Oklahoma and Paulsboro, New Jersey.

"Paulsboro is not on the market, but I have said it is on the bubble," he told reporters. "In other words, it is a plant we are looking at and trying to decide is it in fact worth more to another company than it is to Valero."

Klesse, 61, has been CEO since January 2006. He said Valero is still interested in buying plants, but added it is in an "enviable" selective position.

"We are still interested in acquisitions," he said. "But we do not need to make any and they have to be extremely strategic because of the (high) price of them."

Klesse reiterated that Valero will spend about $4 billion to $5 billon on capital expenditures this year and about $5 billon in 2009.

Valero two weeks ago announced it will spend $2.4 billion to expand its Port Arthur, Texas refinery by the mid-2011. The expansion of the refinery will boost throughput to 415,000 bpd from the current capacity of 325,000 bpd.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 12, 2008, 11:49:14 AM
http://www.amigoe.com/english/

(http://www.amigoe.com/english/images/03-11-Staking-Protestloop.jpg)

Civil servants walked out for more salary

The police say that between 2000 and 3000 civil servants started to gather in front of the Tax-collection Office at Paardenbaai around 08:00 this morning.

ORANJESTAD – A big group of civil servants answered the protesting unions’ call to walk out and protest for more salary.  According to the police, about 2000 to 3000 civil servants, including police officers, teachers, custom personnel, retired civil servants, and employees of government institutions gathered on the property in front of the Tax-collection Office at Paardenbaai this morning.  The group left for the Government Office via Caya Betico Croes around 09:30.

The unions decided to go on strike after the government didn’t come up with a new proposal.  After a long preliminary talk yesterday morning, Premier Nelson Oduber sent a 4-page letter to SDA and Bloke Sindical, explaining to them why the government does not want to index the salaries.  Oduber also reacted on the 5.2 percent catch up that the SDU has demanded.  Initially, the government didn’t want to compensate in 2002.  “The unions then left the negotiations and came back three years later.”  In 2005, after arbitration, the government came with 4 percent, said Oduber.   “The balance due is not 5.2 but 1.2 percent.”

So the government sticks to her first proposal to give each civil servant 950 florins every year for as long as the cost of living remains high.  To Oduber it is strange that the unions reject the compensation proposal.  “They were willing to accept this in 2002 and 2001.”  According to the government, the unions can continue with their actions for indexation.  “There is no money for this.  If they really think that they have the right on indexation, they should go to court.”

The government also invited the unions for a deliberation at 14:30 yesterday.  Only Bloke Sindical showed up.  The civil servants’ union considers the deliberations as ‘exchange of thoughts’, because as long as the government does not accede to her demand for 13.5 percent salary increase, a lawsuit remains unavoidable, said spokesperson Rene Bernabela.  The protesting unions refused to talk with the council of ministers again yesterday.  They each called on their members to meet and discuss the actions for today.  How long these are going to last is not known yet.  According to SDA-spokesperson Magaly Brito, they will continue until the government comes with a serious counterproposal. 

SCHOOLS

Hugo van Varsseveld of Simar indicated this morning that at least half of her 700 members are taking part in the protest action.  The teachers of Colegio Arubano hardly answered Simar’s call to walk out. 

Dean Armand Hessels indicated that because the school management is busy introducing a new computer system, he cannot say exactly how many have walked out.

“Perhaps a small amount of teachers at Colegio EPI walked out”, said director Arturo Oduber.  He needs to wait for the reports of the sector managers to know how many.  He suspects that especially the teachers of the sectors Technique and Healthcare have answered Simar’s call, but he doesn’t know how many.

SKOA, the Catholic Education Foundation of Aruba that manages 48 elementary and secondary schools doesn’t know either how many teachers answered Simar’s call.  Director Haime Mata says that he has to wait for the monthly reports of the 48 schools, but he did say that all the exams and re-exams planned for today took place as usual.   

Chief of police Peter de Witte indicated that the police department is running with minimum staffing.  “We made good arrangements with the union and there is sufficient personnel present on the vital departments and to maintain the public order.”  He doesn’t know though how many police officers are on strike and for how long.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: greeneyedlady on March 12, 2008, 11:56:11 AM
Krotz Springs, La.? ::MonkeyShocked::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on March 12, 2008, 12:04:48 PM
Segment with Drew Peterson is over.  Dana mostly just had a conversation with Drew Peterson, Dana did not interrogate him. 

thanks Klaas...I can't even stand to hear his voice....I'd love to cut his bxlls off!!!

Oh geeze...I'll trade you 4 marbles... a twinkie from my lunch...and, my roller skates..if...if... if you let me cut just one off...puleeezzzzze...huh...wouldja...huh????

Oh you push a hard bargain....OK...you got one ::MonkeyLaugh::

Awright...hands Sunny 4 chipped marbles...1 stale twinkie...pair old rusty roller skates...and a can of WD40....now, gimme the dull knife!


I do lurk a lot and just wanted to say thanx for what everyone does on a daily basis here on scared monkeys.There isn't a day that goes by that someone doesn't make me smile and laugh.For that i'm thankful today!!! ::MonkeyWink::

Keepthefaith


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on March 12, 2008, 12:04:52 PM
Human trafficking increasing
Wednesday 12 March 2008

The number of reports of people trafficking in the Netherlands rose to 716 last year from 579 in 2006, according to figures by the organisation that coordinates statistics on people smuggling.

Of the 667 female victims about 50% had been forced into prostitution. The organisation says actual figures could be higher as many people are afraid to report cases.


http://www.dutchnews.nl/news/archives/2008/03/human_trafficking_increasing.php


Why don't they legalize it :roll:...like everything else :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Destiny on March 12, 2008, 12:05:15 PM
Chief of police Peter de Witte indicated that the police department is running with minimum staffing.  “We made good arrangements with the union and there is sufficient personnel present on the vital departments and to maintain the public order.”  He doesn’t know though how many police officers are on strike and for how long.

Sounds like they might need to call in the ...ta-daaaaaaaa...Beach Patrol  ::MonkeyLaugh::   The wheels on the Bus go round and round...kkkkkKarma...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on March 12, 2008, 12:08:12 PM
http://www.amigoe.com/english/

(http://www.amigoe.com/english/images/03-11-Staking-Protestloop.jpg)

Civil servants walked out for more salary

The police say that between 2000 and 3000 civil servants started to gather in front of the Tax-collection Office at Paardenbaai around 08:00 this morning.

ORANJESTAD – A big group of civil servants answered the protesting unions’ call to walk out and protest for more salary.  According to the police, about 2000 to 3000 civil servants, including police officers, teachers, custom personnel, retired civil servants, and employees of government institutions gathered on the property in front of the Tax-collection Office at Paardenbaai this morning.  The group left for the Government Office via Caya Betico Croes around 09:30.

The unions decided to go on strike after the government didn’t come up with a new proposal.  After a long preliminary talk yesterday morning, Premier Nelson Oduber sent a 4-page letter to SDA and Bloke Sindical, explaining to them why the government does not want to index the salaries.  Oduber also reacted on the 5.2 percent catch up that the SDU has demanded.  Initially, the government didn’t want to compensate in 2002.  “The unions then left the negotiations and came back three years later.”  In 2005, after arbitration, the government came with 4 percent, said Oduber.   “The balance due is not 5.2 but 1.2 percent.”

So the government sticks to her first proposal to give each civil servant 950 florins every year for as long as the cost of living remains high.  To Oduber it is strange that the unions reject the compensation proposal.  “They were willing to accept this in 2002 and 2001.”  According to the government, the unions can continue with their actions for indexation.  “There is no money for this.  If they really think that they have the right on indexation, they should go to court.”

The government also invited the unions for a deliberation at 14:30 yesterday.  Only Bloke Sindical showed up.  The civil servants’ union considers the deliberations as ‘exchange of thoughts’, because as long as the government does not accede to her demand for 13.5 percent salary increase, a lawsuit remains unavoidable, said spokesperson Rene Bernabela.  The protesting unions refused to talk with the council of ministers again yesterday.  They each called on their members to meet and discuss the actions for today.  How long these are going to last is not known yet.  According to SDA-spokesperson Magaly Brito, they will continue until the government comes with a serious counterproposal. 

SCHOOLS

Hugo van Varsseveld of Simar indicated this morning that at least half of her 700 members are taking part in the protest action.  The teachers of Colegio Arubano hardly answered Simar’s call to walk out. 

Dean Armand Hessels indicated that because the school management is busy introducing a new computer system, he cannot say exactly how many have walked out.

“Perhaps a small amount of teachers at Colegio EPI walked out”, said director Arturo Oduber.  He needs to wait for the reports of the sector managers to know how many.  He suspects that especially the teachers of the sectors Technique and Healthcare have answered Simar’s call, but he doesn’t know how many.

SKOA, the Catholic Education Foundation of Aruba that manages 48 elementary and secondary schools doesn’t know either how many teachers answered Simar’s call.  Director Haime Mata says that he has to wait for the monthly reports of the 48 schools, but he did say that all the exams and re-exams planned for today took place as usual.   

Chief of police Peter de Witte indicated that the police department is running with minimum staffing.  “We made good arrangements with the union and there is sufficient personnel present on the vital departments and to maintain the public order.”  He doesn’t know though how many police officers are on strike and for how long.


Aruba Boycotts Aruba!  Good move!

                  ::MonkeyShocked::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on March 12, 2008, 12:12:43 PM
Segment with Drew Peterson is over.  Dana mostly just had a conversation with Drew Peterson, Dana did not interrogate him. 

thanks Klaas...I can't even stand to hear his voice....I'd love to cut his bxlls off!!!

Oh geeze...I'll trade you 4 marbles... a twinkie from my lunch...and, my roller skates..if...if... if you let me cut just one off...puleeezzzzze...huh...wouldja...huh????

Oh you push a hard bargain....OK...you got one ::MonkeyLaugh::

Awright...hands Sunny 4 chipped marbles...1 stale twinkie...pair old rusty roller skates...and a can of WD40....now, gimme the dull knife!


I do lurk a lot and just wanted to say thanx for what everyone does on a daily basis here on scared monkeys.There isn't a day that goes by that someone doesn't make me smile and laugh.For that i'm thankful today!!! ::MonkeyWink::

Keepthefaith

Every Monkey has their own unique contribution to the cage.  Come in and post more on Danger Island.  It's a little less dangerous now, the police are on strike.  They had to tell us or we would never know.  How can they tell?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Destiny on March 12, 2008, 12:22:02 PM
http://www.amigoe.com/english/

(http://www.amigoe.com/english/images/03-11-Staking-Protestloop.jpg)

Civil servants walked out for more salary

The police say that between 2000 and 3000 civil servants started to gather in front of the Tax-collection Office at Paardenbaai around 08:00 this morning.

ORANJESTAD – A big group of civil servants answered the protesting unions’ call to walk out and protest for more salary.  According to the police, about 2000 to 3000 civil servants, including police officers, teachers, custom personnel, retired civil servants, and employees of government institutions gathered on the property in front of the Tax-collection Office at Paardenbaai this morning.  The group left for the Government Office via Caya Betico Croes around 09:30.

The unions decided to go on strike after the government didn’t come up with a new proposal.  After a long preliminary talk yesterday morning, Premier Nelson Oduber sent a 4-page letter to SDA and Bloke Sindical, explaining to them why the government does not want to index the salaries.  Oduber also reacted on the 5.2 percent catch up that the SDU has demanded.  Initially, the government didn’t want to compensate in 2002.  “The unions then left the negotiations and came back three years later.”  In 2005, after arbitration, the government came with 4 percent, said Oduber.   “The balance due is not 5.2 but 1.2 percent.”

So the government sticks to her first proposal to give each civil servant 950 florins every year for as long as the cost of living remains high.  To Oduber it is strange that the unions reject the compensation proposal.  “They were willing to accept this in 2002 and 2001.”  According to the government, the unions can continue with their actions for indexation.  “There is no money for this.  If they really think that they have the right on indexation, they should go to court.”

The government also invited the unions for a deliberation at 14:30 yesterday.  Only Bloke Sindical showed up.  The civil servants’ union considers the deliberations as ‘exchange of thoughts’, because as long as the government does not accede to her demand for 13.5 percent salary increase, a lawsuit remains unavoidable, said spokesperson Rene Bernabela.  The protesting unions refused to talk with the council of ministers again yesterday.  They each called on their members to meet and discuss the actions for today.  How long these are going to last is not known yet.  According to SDA-spokesperson Magaly Brito, they will continue until the government comes with a serious counterproposal. 

SCHOOLS

Hugo van Varsseveld of Simar indicated this morning that at least half of her 700 members are taking part in the protest action.  The teachers of Colegio Arubano hardly answered Simar’s call to walk out. 

Dean Armand Hessels indicated that because the school management is busy introducing a new computer system, he cannot say exactly how many have walked out.

“Perhaps a small amount of teachers at Colegio EPI walked out”, said director Arturo Oduber.  He needs to wait for the reports of the sector managers to know how many.  He suspects that especially the teachers of the sectors Technique and Healthcare have answered Simar’s call, but he doesn’t know how many.

SKOA, the Catholic Education Foundation of Aruba that manages 48 elementary and secondary schools doesn’t know either how many teachers answered Simar’s call.  Director Haime Mata says that he has to wait for the monthly reports of the 48 schools, but he did say that all the exams and re-exams planned for today took place as usual.   

Chief of police Peter de Witte indicated that the police department is running with minimum staffing.  “We made good arrangements with the union and there is sufficient personnel present on the vital departments and to maintain the public order.”  He doesn’t know though how many police officers are on strike and for how long.


Aruba Boycotts Aruba!  Good move!

                  ::MonkeyShocked::

Yep Bearly....we should send them a bunch of *I Stand with the Girl* T's....it would give that protest some *real* meaning...

I love reading articles like this...Thanks Klaas...feel that slight breeze?...it's the flappin' gums of disgruntled, underpaid minions...yeppers...I feel a storm abrewin'...as my Dear Old Grannie use to say..."loose lips, sink ships"...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on March 12, 2008, 12:34:07 PM
I ordered my Tote-bag yesterday and I can't wait to get it!!  ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on March 12, 2008, 12:41:12 PM
Segment with Drew Peterson is over.  Dana mostly just had a conversation with Drew Peterson, Dana did not interrogate him. 

thanks Klaas...I can't even stand to hear his voice....I'd love to cut his bxlls off!!!

Oh geeze...I'll trade you 4 marbles... a twinkie from my lunch...and, my roller skates..if...if... if you let me cut just one off...puleeezzzzze...huh...wouldja...huh????

Oh you push a hard bargain....OK...you got one ::MonkeyLaugh::

Awright...hands Sunny 4 chipped marbles...1 stale twinkie...pair old rusty roller skates...and a can of WD40....now, gimme the dull knife!


I do lurk a lot and just wanted to say thanx for what everyone does on a daily basis here on scared monkeys.There isn't a day that goes by that someone doesn't make me smile and laugh.For that i'm thankful today!!! ::MonkeyWink::

Keepthefaith

Every Monkey has their own unique contribution to the cage.  Come in and post more on Danger Island.  It's a little less dangerous now, the police are on strike.  They had to tell us or we would never know.  How can they tell?


It seems many are taking advantage of the opportunity that Natalee has afforded them.Kinda ironic for those people who bashed Natalee.Seems she's changing a nation,and or Danger Island.Many people on aruba should be thankful for the positive change she has,and will bring to so many lives.While she's changing lives for the better.The VDS family is still trying to get theres.Them are some real sick people.


Keepthefaith


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 12, 2008, 12:47:18 PM
Chief of police Peter de Witte indicated that the police department is running with minimum staffing.  “We made good arrangements with the union and there is sufficient personnel present on the vital departments and to maintain the public order.”  He doesn’t know though how many police officers are on strike and for how long.

Sounds like they might need to call in the ...ta-daaaaaaaa...Beach Patrol  ::MonkeyLaugh::   The wheels on the Bus go round and round...kkkkkKarma...


IIRC it was the Police Union that demanded that Jan van der Straten be re-instated as the Police Commissioner in charge of Natalee's case.

The Aruba police can thank themselves for their hard times. Tough shit.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on March 12, 2008, 12:51:25 PM
 ::MonkeyEek::  someone from Czech Republic searching google for 'Flor' ...weird....
the search took them to SM Shango thread, lol.

Domain Name   iol.cz ? (Czech Republic)
IP Address   85.70.53.# (XDSL NETWORK-ADSL)
ISP   Cesky Telecom, A.S.
Location   Continent  :  Europe
Country  :  Czech Republic  (Facts)
State/Region  :  Stredocesky Kraj
City  :  Beroun
Lat/Long  :  49.95, 14.0833 (Map)
 
Language   English (U.S.)
en-us
Operating System   Microsoft WinXP
Browser   Firefox
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080201 Firefox/2.0.0.12
Javascript   version 1.5
Monitor   Resolution  :  1024 x 768
Color Depth  :  32 bits 
 
Time of Visit   Mar 12 2008 12:38:27 pm
Last Page View   Mar 12 2008 12:38:27 pm
Visit Length   0 seconds
Page Views   1
Referring URL  http://www.google.co...la%20Firefox&start=0
Search Engine  google.co.uk
Search Words  florencia metz
Visit Entry Page   http://scaredmonkeys....php?topic=1952.1000
Visit Exit Page   http://scaredmonkeys....php?topic=1952.1000
Out Click     
Time Zone   UTC+1:00
Visitor's Time   Mar 12 2008 6:38:27 pm
Visit Number   11,424,427


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: private eye on March 12, 2008, 12:55:20 PM
Could it be the beginning of a little civil unrest? Maybe Rudy will cough up part of the $65,000,000 he has made off the backs of the Arubian shoulders, or PVDS will cough up $1,000,000 to pay a small portion of the money he has forced Aruba to spend defending his guilty ass. Arubians, please note, your leaders and their pets are living the good life. Are you?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Bladerunner on March 12, 2008, 12:55:46 PM
Chief of police Peter de Witte indicated that the police department is running with minimum staffing.  “We made good arrangements with the union and there is sufficient personnel present on the vital departments and to maintain the public order.”  He doesn’t know though how many police officers are on strike and for how long.

Sounds like they might need to call in the ...ta-daaaaaaaa...Beach Patrol  ::MonkeyLaugh::   The wheels on the Bus go round and round...kkkkkKarma...


IIRC it was the Police Union that demanded that Jan van der Straten be re-instated as the Police Commissioner in charge of Natalee's case.

The Aruba police can thank themselves for their hard times. Tough shit.


Yeah, tough shit indeed, these people deserve no less and I truly hope the economic collapse of that island continues unabated. If the people of Aruba want to take back their island they could do it in a heartbeat through a coordinated uprising against the corrupt officials that got them into this mess. Until they take action--hint, you could start by advocating for the family of Natalee Holloway and stop with the BS--I'm not sheading a tear for anyone over there, period!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: bleachedblack on March 12, 2008, 12:56:14 PM
...another pic of the demonstration in
aruba.

(http://www.24ora.com/images/stories/news/2008/maart2008/maart11/accion/front.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: private eye on March 12, 2008, 12:56:22 PM
I wish we had the funds and expertise to do a direct mail to the citizens of Aruba:)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: bleachedblack on March 12, 2008, 12:57:49 PM
...another pic of the demonstration in
aruba.

(http://www.24ora.com/images/stories/news/2008/maart2008/maart11/accion/front.jpg)

Here is a link to more...
http://www.24ora.com/content/view/4116/5/#jc_allComments


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Destiny on March 12, 2008, 01:02:41 PM
Could it be the beginning of a little civil unrest? Maybe Rudy will cough up part of the $65,000,000 he has made off the backs of the Arubian shoulders, or PVDS will cough up $1,000,000 to pay a small portion of the money he has forced Aruba to spend defending his guilty ass. Arubians, please note, your leaders and their pets are living the good life. Are you?

PE...this may sound very *dumb*..but it's been on my mind for about an hour...so, tossing it out there...

Can anyone who lives on/near Aruba, set up an internet chat board for the *poor disgruntled minions* to post/vent about the current unrest in Aruba?  I would be more than glad to help fund it!   Just imagine what kinds of things folks could/would post....especially if they are *mad as hell* and want to get back at *the powers that be*....yup...*hungry* folks will complain....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: private eye on March 12, 2008, 01:19:11 PM
Could it be the beginning of a little civil unrest? Maybe Rudy will cough up part of the $65,000,000 he has made off the backs of the Arubian shoulders, or PVDS will cough up $1,000,000 to pay a small portion of the money he has forced Aruba to spend defending his guilty ass. Arubians, please note, your leaders and their pets are living the good life. Are you?

PE...this may sound very *dumb*..but it's been on my mind for about an hour...so, tossing it out there...

Can anyone who lives on/near Aruba, set up an internet chat board for the *poor disgruntled minions* to post/vent about the current unrest in Aruba?  I would be more than glad to help fund it!   Just imagine what kinds of things folks could/would post....especially if they are *mad as hell* and want to get back at *the powers that be*....yup...*hungry* folks will complain....

I've got to get back to work, I hope we can continue this later:)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Jo-An on March 12, 2008, 01:24:25 PM
Hi guys!
I've been checking the usual sites today for news about the case but all I could find this morning was a poll in one of our newspapers here in Holland (Metro).

The question was:

will you buy Patrick van der Eem's book when it comes out?
12% said yes
88% said no
 ::MonkeyConfused::

Beth's book isn't doing too well either.
She didn't make this weeks Top 60 Bestsellers list.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on March 12, 2008, 01:44:00 PM
I wish we had the funds and expertise to do a direct mail to the citizens of Aruba:)

I do direct mail with my company.Very effective.We use a company called Valpak.It usually is around $450 per zone.Get two Zones get third free.Each zone would probably hit estimated 15'000 homes.Three zones maybe around 45'000.Great advertising.Not to expensive and very effective.Here's alink i found.Question is.Would they let the monkey's do it??

http://www.postaruba.com/214.aspx


Keepthefaith


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: jackb on March 12, 2008, 01:51:06 PM
Great job Lisa! ::MonkeyDance::

You sound like a professional spokesperson.

She sounded wonderful didn't she?

heck yes, she sounded good.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: jackb on March 12, 2008, 01:55:13 PM
i have  a HUGE headache after reading my emails....

going to make soup for Church for Lenten Services


Keep the faith....

Try being in my shoes

There is no one who could fill your shoes!!!

                 (http://i78.photobucket.com/albums/j120/Bearlyhere/monkeyshoes.jpg)

Those are similar to mine  ::MonkeyHaHa::

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/monkeyslip1.gif)
 

Better watch them shoes, that monkey shoe got eyes and can see up yo dress.  jack blue


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 12, 2008, 01:56:36 PM
Chief of police Peter de Witte indicated that the police department is running with minimum staffing.  “We made good arrangements with the union and there is sufficient personnel present on the vital departments and to maintain the public order.”  He doesn’t know though how many police officers are on strike and for how long.

Sounds like they might need to call in the ...ta-daaaaaaaa...Beach Patrol  ::MonkeyLaugh::   The wheels on the Bus go round and round...kkkkkKarma...


IIRC it was the Police Union that demanded that Jan van der Straten be re-instated as the Police Commissioner in charge of Natalee's case.

The Aruba police can thank themselves for their hard times. Tough shit.


Yeah, tough shit indeed, these people deserve no less and I truly hope the economic collapse of that island continues unabated. If the people of Aruba want to take back their island they could do it in a heartbeat through a coordinated uprising against the corrupt officials that got them into this mess. Until they take action--hint, you could start by advocating for the family of Natalee Holloway and stop with the BS--I'm not sheading a tear for anyone over there, period!

 ::MonkeyDance::


The Aruban people where so quick to defend the rights of those who had lied and obstructed the investigation into the disappearance of 18 year old American citizen.  They had no empathy ... no understanding ... no compassion ... regarding the outrage of an anguished mother who could not comprehend the release of Deepak and Satish.  They lack the insight that  Beth Twitty possessed ... the insight that told her that conflicts of interest abound ... that a corrupt investigation was denying her daughter justice.

Janet

+++++++++++++++++++

AN ANGUISHED MOTHER'S PLEA

Beth Holloway Twitty
CNN LIVE TODAY
July 5, 2005

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0507/05/lt.03.html

BETH HOLLOWAY TWITTY, NATALEE HOLLOWAY'S MOTHER: It is now that I ask the world to help me. Two suspects were released yesterday who were involved in a violent crime against my daughter. These criminals are not only allowed to walk freely among the tourists and citizens of Aruba, but there are no limits where they may choose to travel.

I am asking all mothers and fathers and all nations to hear my plea. I implore you, do not allow these two suspects, the Kalpoe brothers, to enter your country until this case is solved. Do not allow these criminals to walk among your citizens. Help me by not allowing these two to get away with this crime.

It is my greatest fear today that the Kalpoe brothers will leave Aruba. I am asking the Aruban officials to notify the United States State Department in the event these suspects try to leave this island. I am asking all nations not to offer them a safe haven. I am asking this in the name of my beautiful, intelligent and outstanding daughter who I haven't seen for 36 days and for whom I will continue to search until I find her.


THE ARUBAN PEOPLE NEGATE AN ANQUISHED MOTHER'S PLEA.

Beth Holloway
LOVING NATALEE

Page 157/158

No one is breathing.  Or Moving.  Reporters and camera people are crying.  The media hve been here more than a month, and they've seen firthand what we've experienced.  They are moved by this plea.  But some of the Arubans are not.  Calling their local sons "criminals" offends them.  Having just heard the prosecuting attorney tell us at least one of the Kalpoes could be involved in whatever happened to my daughter.  Ifelt the term seemed appropriate.  But it led to an abrupt change in the tide of support.

<snipped:

Not long after the "criminals speech," some Arubans back off their prayer vigils for Natalee.  A few protest in the streets against the barage of negative media.  We've worn out our welcom at the Holiday Inn.  And they let us know they've had it.  The Arub Tourism Authority (ATA), the Aruba Hotel and Tourism Association (AHATA), the Aruba Trad and Industry Association and a scattering of island officials establish the Strategic Communications Task Force to combat the negative media.  And to combat us.


John Merryweather
'Scarborough Country'
July 6, 2005

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8498049/

SCARBOROUGH:  It sounds like things are really heating up in Aruba.  Give us the very latest. 

RON BLOME, NBC CORRESPONDENT: Well, they like to call this their slogan, one happy island.  But this fabric of politeness is what being frayed here.  There was a rally scheduled for last night for justice.  But after Beth Holloway came on the air yesterday and was very direct in calling the Kalpoe brothers criminals who had been left to walk the island, well, this protest last night turned into something else.  It was a protest against the media, and also against the very sharp language that Beth Twitty had used yesterday.

SCARBOROUGH:  One man who does understand it, though, is our next guest.  He is John Merryweather.  He's a former Aruban minister and was a participant in yesterday's protest.  Mr. Merryweather, thank you so much for being with us tonight.  Tell us, why were you involved in that protest?  What do you think that Natalee's mother did wrong?
 
JOHN MERRYWEATHER, FORMER ARUBA DIPLOMAT:  Well, first—no, no, first of all, I'd like to answer why I was at the—not protest.  It was a gathering in support of our justice system.  It was not a protest.  It never started out as a protest either.  I would like that to be very, very clear.  When I was there, I hadn't heard what the comments of Natalee's mother either of the day.  I was asked that after I was there.  I went there.  I was not part of the organization, but I went there in support of our justice system.

<snipped?

SCARBOROUGH:  No, what did Natalee's mother say that offended so many people in Aruba?  

MERRYWEATHER:  Well, you know, it—it—it offended me, also.  You cannot—these two boys, I don't know them.  I don't know the parents.  I don't know anyone involved in this personally. 

But our justice system, as yours in the states, you are innocent until proven guilty.


AN ANQUISHED MOTHER'S INTIMIDATED APOLOGY

Beth Holloway Twitty
CNN - LAW CENTER
July 8, 2005

http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/07/08/missing.aruba/index.html

ORANJESTAD, Aruba (CNN) -- The mother of Natalee Holloway apologized Friday for saying two released suspects were involved in her daughter's disappearance.

"The statements I made on July 5th were fueled by despair and frustration because of still not knowing where my daughter is," Beth Holloway Twitty said in a statement to the media. "I think everyone, everyone can sympathize with that."


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: jackb on March 12, 2008, 01:57:36 PM
Glenda aka Renfro is such a load.

She posted at RU:

Glenda Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 10:34 pm   
Gov't Inspectors at the Entrance of every Casino

This is an absolute fact. Everyone who says it is not true has an agenda to discredit all information that comes from Aruba.

The question is why? 
========================================================
So, how did Joran get in to gamble so often?
Isn't there another rule that says a redident of Aruba can only
frequent a casino so many days per month.  That rule doesn't seem to
be enforced either.


Sure Glenda, just like these inspectors at this entrance.  Maybe they are "invisible inspectors"  ::MonkeyWink::

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/ABC11-1.jpg)
 
Could be Joran, could be val.  It is so blurry it could be anyone in Joran clothes, even Palus.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: katrien on March 12, 2008, 02:00:14 PM
This was on  the Dutch Crimesite:

Quote
Joran vroeg Van der Eem om het zwijggeld

Daury, de man die volgens Joran van der Sloot het lichaam van Natalee Holloway heeft weggewerkt, wilde 2000 euro zwijggeld hebben. Joran vroeg dat geld, tijdens de vermaarde Range Rover-rit, aan Patrick van der Eem. ‘Maar die heeft dat nooit gegeven’, zegt Van der Eems woordvoerder.
In Revu van deze week gaat Van der Eems perschref Peter Schouten uitgebreid in op de opmerkelijke uitspraken die Patrick deed in het stiekem opgenomen Arubaanse tv-programma Un dia den Bida. Daarin liet Van der Eem zich tegenover de presentator Poentje Castro onder meer ontvallen dat hij ‘weet wie Natalee in zee heeft gegooid’. ‘Patrick zegt het op een wijze die duidelijk maakt dat het om een opinie gaat, geen wetenschap.’

Volgens Schouten is er geen sprake van dat presentator Poentje Castro door Van der Eem zou zijn bedreigd. Hij zegt dat Castro een slaatje wilde slaan uit de geheime opnamen. ‘Het was verbijsterend om te horen dat Castro deze banden aan Patrick wilde verkopen.’

In het gesprek had Van der Eem het over ‘minicamera’s’ in planten. ‘Dat was een idee van Patrick voordat hij in contact kwam met Peter R. de Vries, waarna het echte plan met de Range Rover ontstond.’

Stan de Jong & Koen Voskuil

This is what I read:

Quote
Joran asked v.d. Eem  hush-money.

Daury, the man which according to Joran v.d. S.  got rid of the body of Natalee Holloway, wanted 2000 euro hush-money.  Joran asked the money during the famous drive in the Range-Rover from Patrick v.d. Eem. “But he never gave the money” says the spokesman of Van der Eem.
In the Revu of this week, Peter Schouten, the spokesman of v.d. Eem, talks extensively about the remarkable pronunciations done by Patrick in the underhand recorded Aruban TV show Un dia den Bida. In this program v.d. Eem supposed to have told Poentje Castro that he “knows who Natalee dropped in the sea”. “Patrick told it in a way which makes clear this is an opinion, not a knowledge.
According to Schouten Poentje is not threatened by Van der Eem. He says Castro will make a profit by the secret recording. “It was bewildering to hear that Castro wanted to sell these tapes to Patrick”.
In the conversation v.d. Eem talked about minicamera’s in plants. That was an idea of Patrick before he contacted Peter R de Vries.  After the contact with Peter R de Vries the plan with the Range Rover was born.

Stan de Jong en Koen Voskuil.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 12, 2008, 02:01:07 PM
Chief of police Peter de Witte indicated that the police department is running with minimum staffing.  “We made good arrangements with the union and there is sufficient personnel present on the vital departments and to maintain the public order.”  He doesn’t know though how many police officers are on strike and for how long.

Sounds like they might need to call in the ...ta-daaaaaaaa...Beach Patrol  ::MonkeyLaugh::   The wheels on the Bus go round and round...kkkkkKarma...


IIRC it was the Police Union that demanded that Jan van der Straten be re-instated as the Police Commissioner in charge of Natalee's case.

The Aruba police can thank themselves for their hard times. Tough shit.


Yeah, tough shit indeed, these people deserve no less and I truly hope the economic collapse of that island continues unabated. If the people of Aruba want to take back their island they could do it in a heartbeat through a coordinated uprising against the corrupt officials that got them into this mess. Until they take action--hint, you could start by advocating for the family of Natalee Holloway and stop with the BS--I'm not sheading a tear for anyone over there, period!


Nor will I shed a tear Bladerunner. I don't see an end in sight for the people of Aruba until their government provides justice for Natalee. The boycott is picking up steam and will continue to do so as more corruption is exposed. Their tourism numbers continue to slide as their cost of living rises, hence the protests by the unions.

Silent in all this are their fearless leaders Nelson Oduber and Rudy Croes. I haven't heard a peep out of either since Joran's confession short of that little neener neener outburst by Little Balls Rudy about Joran being persona non grata in Aruba. That's really bringing the hammer down isn't it?

We can only assume Aruba has no leaders, they are all taking cover from the outrage at Joran's confession and the failure of their prosecutor and judges to do anything about it. A nation's economy is a helluva price to pay for two Dutch scumbags.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: jackb on March 12, 2008, 02:02:20 PM
What kind of shoes does Joran have on as he is coming through
the door of the casino?  (I know it has probably been checked before)

Really hard to tell when you enlarge it but it looks like just plain white tennis shoes.

Well, they look like size 10 1/2 to me. ::MonkeyTongue::
 

Yeah, the picture is so clear it is showing guido hair.  Bet you could see that shoe size right inside his shoe.  This picture is not worth anything the way it is.  A young man that size would almost have to have a 14 shoe to keep his hulking frame from toppling over.  The picture is not clear because they do not want anyone to be able to prove who it is.      jack b


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 12, 2008, 02:03:45 PM
Could it be the beginning of a little civil unrest? Maybe Rudy will cough up part of the $65,000,000 he has made off the backs of the Arubian shoulders, or PVDS will cough up $1,000,000 to pay a small portion of the money he has forced Aruba to spend defending his guilty ass. Arubians, please note, your leaders and their pets are living the good life. Are you?

PE...this may sound very *dumb*..but it's been on my mind for about an hour...so, tossing it out there...

Can anyone who lives on/near Aruba, set up an internet chat board for the *poor disgruntled minions* to post/vent about the current unrest in Aruba?  I would be more than glad to help fund it!   Just imagine what kinds of things folks could/would post....especially if they are *mad as hell* and want to get back at *the powers that be*....yup...*hungry* folks will complain....


One heck of a great idea Destiny. If the blog/forum were US based there is jack the Arubans could do about it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 12, 2008, 02:05:34 PM
Could it be the beginning of a little civil unrest? Maybe Rudy will cough up part of the $65,000,000 he has made off the backs of the Arubian shoulders, or PVDS will cough up $1,000,000 to pay a small portion of the money he has forced Aruba to spend defending his guilty ass. Arubians, please note, your leaders and their pets are living the good life. Are you?


The only coughing those two will do is at the proctologist. They need to take it from them at gunpoint with a subpoena.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 12, 2008, 02:06:54 PM
http://www.amigoe.com/english/

(http://www.amigoe.com/english/images/03-11-Staking-Protestloop.jpg)

Civil servants walked out for more salary



I got news for these people, Aruba ain't got no money.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: jackb on March 12, 2008, 02:20:47 PM
Chief of police Peter de Witte indicated that the police department is running with minimum staffing.  “We made good arrangements with the union and there is sufficient personnel present on the vital departments and to maintain the public order.”  He doesn’t know though how many police officers are on strike and for how long.

Sounds like they might need to call in the ...ta-daaaaaaaa...Beach Patrol  ::MonkeyLaugh::   The wheels on the Bus go round and round...kkkkkKarma...
 

From the looks of it "minimum" personel or no, what would be the difference.  They don't do anything but screw the good guys and allow the thugs to run the place.  They are a disgrace to the world.   Jack blue


IIRC it was the Police Union that demanded that Jan van der Straten be re-instated as the Police Commissioner in charge of Natalee's case.

The Aruba police can thank themselves for their hard times. Tough shit.


Yeah, tough shit indeed, these people deserve no less and I truly hope the economic collapse of that island continues unabated. If the people of Aruba want to take back their island they could do it in a heartbeat through a coordinated uprising against the corrupt officials that got them into this mess. Until they take action--hint, you could start by advocating for the family of Natalee Holloway and stop with the BS--I'm not sheading a tear for anyone over there, period!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: jackb on March 12, 2008, 02:39:51 PM
Chief of police Peter de Witte indicated that the police department is running with minimum staffing.  “We made good arrangements with the union and there is sufficient personnel present on the vital departments and to maintain the public order.”  He doesn’t know though how many police officers are on strike and for how long.

Sounds like they might need to call in the ...ta-daaaaaaaa...Beach Patrol  ::MonkeyLaugh::   The wheels on the Bus go round and round...kkkkkKarma...
 

From the looks of it "minimum" personel or no, what would be the difference.  They don't do anything but screw the good guys and allow the thugs to run the place.  They are a disgrace to the world.   Jack blue



IIRC it was the Police Union that demanded that Jan van der Straten be re-instated as the Police Commissioner in charge of Natalee's case.

The Aruba police can thank themselves for their hard times. Tough shit.


Yeah, tough shit indeed, these people deserve no less and I truly hope the economic collapse of that island continues unabated. If the people of Aruba want to take back their island they could do it in a heartbeat through a coordinated uprising against the corrupt officials that got them into this mess. Until they take action--hint, you could start by advocating for the family of Natalee Holloway and stop with the BS--I'm not sheading a tear for anyone over there, period!


Nor will I shed a tear Bladerunner. I don't see an end in sight for the people of Aruba until their government provides justice for Natalee. The boycott is picking up steam and will continue to do so as more corruption is exposed. Their tourism numbers continue to slide as their cost of living rises, hence the protests by the unions.

Silent in all this are their fearless leaders Nelson Oduber and Rudy Croes. I haven't heard a peep out of either since Joran's confession short of that little neener neener outburst by Little Balls Rudy about Joran being persona non grata in Aruba. That's really bringing the hammer down isn't it?

We can only assume Aruba has no leaders, they are all taking cover from the outrage at Joran's confession and the failure of their prosecutor and judges to do anything about it. A nation's economy is a helluva price to pay for two Dutch scumbags.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: jackb on March 12, 2008, 02:44:32 PM
http://www.amigoe.com/english/

(http://www.amigoe.com/english/images/03-11-Staking-Protestloop.jpg)

Civil servants walked out for more salary



I got news for these people, Aruba ain't got no money.
  They aren't worth a hoot even if they had money.  Money cannot buy Truth.
Money cannot buy integrity.  They have none, it seems and are a disgrace to the World.   Jack blue


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Destiny on March 12, 2008, 03:02:02 PM
Could it be the beginning of a little civil unrest? Maybe Rudy will cough up part of the $65,000,000 he has made off the backs of the Arubian shoulders, or PVDS will cough up $1,000,000 to pay a small portion of the money he has forced Aruba to spend defending his guilty ass. Arubians, please note, your leaders and their pets are living the good life. Are you?

PE...this may sound very *dumb*..but it's been on my mind for about an hour...so, tossing it out there...

Can anyone who lives on/near Aruba, set up an internet chat board for the *poor disgruntled minions* to post/vent about the current unrest in Aruba?  I would be more than glad to help fund it!   Just imagine what kinds of things folks could/would post....especially if they are *mad as hell* and want to get back at *the powers that be*....yup...*hungry* folks will complain....


One heck of a great idea Destiny. If the blog/forum were US based there is jack the Arubans could do about it.

Well...I do have an open account with Monster.com...I have 2 websites...with all the bells and whistles I'm not using...I just don't have the time to manage it with my Business...whatcha think...eh?  I'll keep paying for the site...if someone *trustworthy* manages it...and it is *dedicated* to the issues mentioned above... we need tick out a domain name for the site...I'll procure it....just thinking here....

Arubaiwantmymoney.com

Also...need to find out how much Jossy would charge for a nice display ad to promote it in Aruba...hahahhaha...I'm a mean Monkey...NOT!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Peaches on March 12, 2008, 03:13:51 PM
I ordered my Tote-bag yesterday and I can't wait to get it!!  ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

I LOVE tote bags.  I'll have to do some shopping.  Thanks for the reminder.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 12, 2008, 03:29:56 PM
I ordered my Tote-bag yesterday and I can't wait to get it!!  ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

I LOVE tote bags.  I'll have to do some shopping.  Thanks for the reminder.

NOTE - looks like Cafepress has removed any items with Natalee's photo on them.  I'll see if Red can email them and straighten it out but WAIT to order.  If you have already ordered the Tote or Shirt with Natalee's photo you might get it but as on now they aren't available.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 12, 2008, 03:34:25 PM
I ordered my Tote-bag yesterday and I can't wait to get it!!  ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

I LOVE tote bags.  I'll have to do some shopping.  Thanks for the reminder.

NOTE - looks like Cafepress has removed any items with Natalee's photo on them.  I'll see if Red can email them and straighten it out but WAIT to order.  If you have already ordered the Tote or Shirt with Natalee's photo you might get it but as on now they aren't available.

Peaches - I'm so sorry.  Looks like Cafepress just removed them today.  Hopefully Red can get them to reconsider. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Magnolia on March 12, 2008, 03:39:31 PM

[/quote]

Those are similar to mine  ::MonkeyHaHa::

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/monkeyslip1.gif)
[/quote] 

Better watch them shoes, that monkey shoe got eyes and can see up yo dress.  jack blue
[/quote]

 ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 12, 2008, 03:41:42 PM
http://www.amigoe.com/english/

<snipped>

Civil servants walked out for more salary


I got news for these people, Aruba ain't got no money.

They aren't worth a hoot even if they had money.  Money cannot buy Truth.
Money cannot buy integrity.  They have none, it seems and are a disgrace to the World.   Jack blue

Does the average Aruban not comprehend that he/she or his/her loved ones are at risk of false implication in a crime everytime the "Dutch elite" in Aruba" take it upon themselves to protect their own from accountability in regards to illegal activies.

In June, 2005 there was an obvious attempt to frame the security guards.  Their social/economic status dictated they could be the sacrifice lambs who would take the place of Joran and Paulus.  The tactic may have worked if it were not for a voice that refused to be silent ... the voice that demanded the truth ... the voice of Beth Holloway Twitty.

Janet

++++++++

Beth Twitty
'Rita Cosby Live & Direct'
December 5, 2005

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10348437/

TWITTY: ... Remember, within the first 24 hours, we knew who the suspects were. We knew the persons that Natalee were taken from Carlos and Charlie‘s. We knew the license plate of the gray Honda they placed her in. We knew the condition that Natalee was in. We knew the behavior or the conduct in which they engaged in with Natalee.

And then not only that, Jane, within 72 hours, we knew that their first story was totally fabricated, that within the first 72 hours, I faced a room of 12 -- at least 12 detectives, Aruban and Dutch detectives, and a lead detective, Dennis Jacobs (ph), and they knew after we reviewed video footage from the Holiday Inn casino lobby that my daughter had never been brought back to the Holiday Inn. They knew that those suspects were fabricating a story from day one.

<snipped>

TWITTY: Well, Jane, something that the family knew—and we have to keep reminding everyone—after 72 hours -- 72 hours—we knew definitively that these suspects were not telling the truth. We knew that my daughter had never been brought back to the Holiday Inn. Of course we were becoming frustrated. Who wouldn‘t, at this point? You know, we—and what was so unbelievable about this, is they knew this information and still chose to pursue the two security guards on June the 5th.


Arubans Agree: Race Not an Issue
Tuesday, June 14, 2005

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,159481,00.html

Some Arubans say that while race may not have played a role in the detentions, class could have. The Dutch man in police custody is the privileged son of a Justice Ministry official, and his two Surinamese friends are from a middle-class family.

The two blacks, meanwhile, live in a poor town of oil refinery workers.


First they came ....

"In Germany, they came first for the Communists, And I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a Communist;
 
And then they came for the trade unionists, And I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a trade unionist;
 
And then they came for the Jews, And I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a Jew;

And then . . . they came for me . . . And by that time there was no one left to speak up."

Pastor Martin Niemöller (1892–1984)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Destiny on March 12, 2008, 03:41:58 PM
I ordered my Tote-bag yesterday and I can't wait to get it!!  ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

I LOVE tote bags.  I'll have to do some shopping.  Thanks for the reminder.

NOTE - looks like Cafepress has removed any items with Natalee's photo on them.  I'll see if Red can email them and straighten it out but WAIT to order.  If you have already ordered the Tote or Shirt with Natalee's photo you might get it but as on now they aren't available.

Thanks Klaas...I went there early this AM to order some items...noticed there were NO pix...thought it was my computer....what a shame...wonder *who* gave them the heebie-jeebies.....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 12, 2008, 03:47:32 PM
I ordered my Tote-bag yesterday and I can't wait to get it!!  ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

I LOVE tote bags.  I'll have to do some shopping.  Thanks for the reminder.

NOTE - looks like Cafepress has removed any items with Natalee's photo on them.  I'll see if Red can email them and straighten it out but WAIT to order.  If you have already ordered the Tote or Shirt with Natalee's photo you might get it but as on now they aren't available.

Thanks Klaas...I went there early this AM to order some items...noticed there were NO pix...thought it was my computer....what a shame...wonder *who* gave them the heebie-jeebies.....

Cafepress has done this to us before, even with recognizable cartoon images that are copywrited.  I'm hoping Red can get them to allow Natalee's pic.  I do believe Beth would send Cafepress an email and approve if necessary. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: bluwaters on March 12, 2008, 03:52:48 PM
Hi Monkeys!
What's up with Cafepress? Why would they remove Natalee's pho   ::MonkeyEek::to?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on March 12, 2008, 03:56:15 PM
Are there any leftover from the travel shows that Peaches could get one??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Miss Scarlet on March 12, 2008, 05:01:58 PM
Looks like Joran was wearing this or something very similar when he was at the Casino that night (I used this pic to test the size of his shoe to his forearm, lol )


(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/joranshoeforearm.jpg)

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/ABC11-1.jpg)

I realize the shoe size has been over analyzed, but . . . if that is a folded up newspaper Joran is holding, it basically solves the riddle.  That would be a 10 1/2 ish, but could NEVER be construed as a 14!

CBB, Thank you for my beautiful Easter frock.   ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: mojo on March 12, 2008, 05:02:11 PM
This was on  the Dutch Crimesite:

Quote
Joran vroeg Van der Eem om het zwijggeld

Daury, de man die volgens Joran van der Sloot het lichaam van Natalee Holloway heeft weggewerkt, wilde 2000 euro zwijggeld hebben. Joran vroeg dat geld, tijdens de vermaarde Range Rover-rit, aan Patrick van der Eem. ‘Maar die heeft dat nooit gegeven’, zegt Van der Eems woordvoerder.
In Revu van deze week gaat Van der Eems perschref Peter Schouten uitgebreid in op de opmerkelijke uitspraken die Patrick deed in het stiekem opgenomen Arubaanse tv-programma Un dia den Bida. Daarin liet Van der Eem zich tegenover de presentator Poentje Castro onder meer ontvallen dat hij ‘weet wie Natalee in zee heeft gegooid’. ‘Patrick zegt het op een wijze die duidelijk maakt dat het om een opinie gaat, geen wetenschap.’

Volgens Schouten is er geen sprake van dat presentator Poentje Castro door Van der Eem zou zijn bedreigd. Hij zegt dat Castro een slaatje wilde slaan uit de geheime opnamen. ‘Het was verbijsterend om te horen dat Castro deze banden aan Patrick wilde verkopen.’

In het gesprek had Van der Eem het over ‘minicamera’s’ in planten. ‘Dat was een idee van Patrick voordat hij in contact kwam met Peter R. de Vries, waarna het echte plan met de Range Rover ontstond.’

Stan de Jong & Koen Voskuil

This is what I read:

Quote
Joran asked v.d. Eem  hush-money.

Daury, the man which according to Joran v.d. S.  got rid of the body of Natalee Holloway, wanted 2000 euro hush-money.  Joran asked the money during the famous drive in the Range-Rover from Patrick v.d. Eem. “But he never gave the money” says the spokesman of Van der Eem.
In the Revu of this week, Peter Schouten, the spokesman of v.d. Eem, talks extensively about the remarkable pronunciations done by Patrick in the underhand recorded Aruban TV show Un dia den Bida. In this program v.d. Eem supposed to have told Poentje Castro that he “knows who Natalee dropped in the sea”. “Patrick told it in a way which makes clear this is an opinion, not a knowledge.
According to Schouten Poentje is not threatened by Van der Eem. He says Castro will make a profit by the secret recording. “It was bewildering to hear that Castro wanted to sell these tapes to Patrick”.
In the conversation v.d. Eem talked about minicamera’s in plants. That was an idea of Patrick before he contacted Peter R de Vries.  After the contact with Peter R de Vries the plan with the Range Rover was born.

Stan de Jong en Koen Voskuil.



interesting. well we saw patrick talk about getting some money for this guy, so i wonder when joran's request came...before or after patrick mentioned it and in what context. i'm wondering why no one is calling poentje out on this. did jossy have anything to add about this?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: ocgirl on March 12, 2008, 05:29:25 PM
http://www.amigoe.com/english/

(http://www.amigoe.com/english/images/03-11-Staking-Protestloop.jpg)

Civil servants walked out for more salary


I got news for these people, Aruba ain't got no money.



Sounds like a VERY good time to remind Aruba's "common folk" about any uncollected Reward Monies....as long as their feeling the pinch in their wallets from the lack of tourism....don't ya think?    ::MonkeyCool::

ocgirl
(signing off and going back to work!)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Peaches on March 12, 2008, 05:34:36 PM
I ordered my Tote-bag yesterday and I can't wait to get it!!  ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

I LOVE tote bags.  I'll have to do some shopping.  Thanks for the reminder.

NOTE - looks like Cafepress has removed any items with Natalee's photo on them.  I'll see if Red can email them and straighten it out but WAIT to order.  If you have already ordered the Tote or Shirt with Natalee's photo you might get it but as on now they aren't available.

You know that's what I was looking for, don't ya??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Blonde on March 12, 2008, 05:40:35 PM
Two Suspects Charged in UNC Killing
HILLSBOROUGH, N.C. (March 12) - Authorities charged two suspects Wednesday with first-degree murder in the killing of the University of North Carolina's student body president.
Police charged two suspects Wednesday with first-degree murder in the killing of University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill student body president Eve Carson, above. Demario James Atwater, 21, of Durham, was arrested and held without bond. Police are still looking for 17-year-old Lawrence Alvin Lovett Jr.

Demario James Atwater, 21, of Durham, was arrested and ordered held without bond. Shackled at the ankle and waist and with a public defender at his side, Atwater whispered "yes" when asked whether he understood the charge against him. His next court appearance was scheduled for March 24.

Police said they are still searching for 17-year-old Lawrence Alvin Lovett Jr.

Chapel Hill Police Chief Brian Curran declined to say which of the suspects shot and killed Carson, a 22-year-old from Athens, Ga., found lying on a street a week ago about a mile from campus.

The biology and political science major had been shot several times, including once in the right temple. Her body was positively identified the next day, leading to an outpouring of grief at North Carolina.

"I hope the arrest can ease the minds of some in the community," District Attorney Jim Woodall said.

In the day after Carson's death, police focused their investigation on a suspect pictured in several surveillance photos using her ATM card.

The Board of Trustees at North Carolina offered a $25,000 reward for information leading to an arrest in her death, and police received hundreds of tips after the first two photos were released over the weekend.

Carson was a prestigious Morehead-Cain scholar at North Carolina, where she was remembered by thousands who gathered Thursday at two campus memorial services. Hundreds of mourners filled the First United Methodist Church in Athens on Sunday at a memorial service in her hometown.

The university said Wednesday a third memorial service will be held next week at the campus basketball arena.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on March 12, 2008, 05:47:16 PM
Well.....looks like things are at a standstill once again :(
Will there ever be truth, justice and Natalee's remains given back to her family...

:(


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: caesu on March 12, 2008, 06:01:33 PM
tabloid gossip magazine Privé reporting Joran is in a mental clinic near Dutch city of Utrecht.
also interview with Beth in their upcoming issue.

http://www.prive.nl/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: mojo on March 12, 2008, 06:05:31 PM
tabloid gossip magazine Privé reporting Joran is in a mental clinic near Dutch city of Utrecht.
also interview with Beth in their upcoming issue.

http://www.prive.nl/

didn't svetlana or whatever her name was (joran's ghostwriter that he was MSM'ing with during the days of the devries brouhaha) write for that rag?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 12, 2008, 06:08:07 PM
I ordered my Tote-bag yesterday and I can't wait to get it!!  ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

I LOVE tote bags.  I'll have to do some shopping.  Thanks for the reminder.

NOTE - looks like Cafepress has removed any items with Natalee's photo on them.  I'll see if Red can email them and straighten it out but WAIT to order.  If you have already ordered the Tote or Shirt with Natalee's photo you might get it but as on now they aren't available.

You know that's what I was looking for, don't ya??

Peaches - I was going to get one of those Tote bags too...hopefully we can get Natalee's pic back, if not I'll add a tote with "I Stand With The Girl" on both sides. ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: caesu on March 12, 2008, 06:10:19 PM
tabloid gossip magazine Privé reporting Joran is in a mental clinic near Dutch city of Utrecht.
also interview with Beth in their upcoming issue.

http://www.prive.nl/

didn't svetlana or whatever her name was (joran's ghostwriter that he was MSM'ing with during the days of the devries brouhaha) write for that rag?

no, Zvezdana Vukojevic writes for newspaper DAG.
http://www.dag.nl/Nieuws/Artikelpagina-Nieuws/Ik-ben-ergens-waar-niemand-het-weet.htm


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 12, 2008, 06:13:44 PM
tabloid gossip magazine Privé reporting Joran is in a mental clinic near Dutch city of Utrecht.
also interview with Beth in their upcoming issue.

http://www.prive.nl/

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/JoranCuckoo-1.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: mojo on March 12, 2008, 06:15:38 PM
thanks caesu...i can handle the dutch names but the russian/slavic ones throw me. there is a big university hospital in utrecht, so it would be an obvious guess, i suppose??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: caesu on March 12, 2008, 06:28:18 PM
thanks caesu...i can handle the dutch names but the russian/slavic ones throw me. there is a big university hospital in utrecht, so it would be an obvious guess, i suppose??

yes but i think a public hospital would be to much exposed.
there are dozens of little mental clinic rehab private kind of places all over the country.

but i repeat that Privé is a very crappy gossip magazine. worse than Revu.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: bleachedblack on March 12, 2008, 06:32:31 PM
tabloid gossip magazine Privé reporting Joran is in a mental clinic near Dutch city of Utrecht.
also interview with Beth in their upcoming issue.

http://www.prive.nl/

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/JoranCuckoo-1.jpg)

 ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::
....one of my favorite movies!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Kiwi on March 12, 2008, 06:40:23 PM
tabloid gossip magazine Privé reporting Joran is in a mental clinic near Dutch city of Utrecht.
also interview with Beth in their upcoming issue.

http://www.prive.nl/

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/JoranCuckoo-1.jpg)
Klaasend I have to tell you my staff is still laughing over this photo! Made our day.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Jo-An on March 12, 2008, 06:42:22 PM

tabloid gossip magazine Privé reporting Joran is in a mental clinic near Dutch city of Utrecht.
also interview with Beth in their upcoming issue.

http://www.prive.nl/

Den Dolder is quite "famous" for its mental institution, mainly because of the railroad nearby; a lot of suicides/attempts.
Close to Utrecht.

<iframe width="425" height="350" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0" src="http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&amp;hl=nl&amp;geocode=&amp;q=den+dolder&amp;sll=37.0625,-95.677068&amp;sspn=33.352165,81.738281&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;ll=52.165509,5.258331&amp;spn=0.100989,0.31929&amp;z=12&amp;output=embed&amp;s=AARTsJqUNAyL-IEEpN5sdO-ik-PEhpbWLQ"></iframe><br /><small><a href="http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&amp;hl=nl&amp;geocode=&amp;q=den+dolder&amp;sll=37.0625,-95.677068&amp;sspn=33.352165,81.738281&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;ll=52.165509,5.258331&amp;spn=0.100989,0.31929&amp;z=12&amp;source=embed" style="color:#0000FF;text-align:left">Grotere kaart weergeven</a></small>


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Jo-An on March 12, 2008, 06:44:19 PM

tabloid gossip magazine Privé reporting Joran is in a mental clinic near Dutch city of Utrecht.
also interview with Beth in their upcoming issue.

http://www.prive.nl/

Den Dolder is quite "famous" for its mental institution, mainly because of the railroad nearby; a lot of suicides/attempts.
Close to Utrecht.

<iframe width="425" height="350" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0" src="http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&amp;hl=nl&amp;geocode=&amp;q=den+dolder&amp;sll=37.0625,-95.677068&amp;sspn=33.352165,81.738281&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;ll=52.165509,5.258331&amp;spn=0.100989,0.31929&amp;z=12&amp;output=embed&amp;s=AARTsJqUNAyL-IEEpN5sdO-ik-PEhpbWLQ"></iframe><br /><small><a href="http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&amp;hl=nl&amp;geocode=&amp;q=den+dolder&amp;sll=37.0625,-95.677068&amp;sspn=33.352165,81.738281&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;ll=52.165509,5.258331&amp;spn=0.100989,0.31929&amp;z=12&amp;source=embed" style="color:#0000FF;text-align:left">Grotere kaart weergeven</a></small>

Messed up the link!
Don't know what happened here...
Aaaanyway: Den Dolder is pretty close to Utrecht.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: cubbeegirl on March 12, 2008, 06:44:57 PM
I ordered my Tote-bag yesterday and I can't wait to get it!!  ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

I LOVE tote bags.  I'll have to do some shopping.  Thanks for the reminder.

NOTE - looks like Cafepress has removed any items with Natalee's photo on them.  I'll see if Red can email them and straighten it out but WAIT to order.  If you have already ordered the Tote or Shirt with Natalee's photo you might get it but as on now they aren't available.

You know that's what I was looking for, don't ya??

Well poopy! That's what I was looking for too Peaches!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Bearlyhere on March 12, 2008, 06:49:03 PM
Segment with Drew Peterson is over.  Dana mostly just had a conversation with Drew Peterson, Dana did not interrogate him. 

thanks Klaas...I can't even stand to hear his voice....I'd love to cut his bxlls off!!!

Oh geeze...I'll trade you 4 marbles... a twinkie from my lunch...and, my roller skates..if...if... if you let me cut just one off...puleeezzzzze...huh...wouldja...huh????

Oh you push a hard bargain....OK...you got one ::MonkeyLaugh::

Awright...hands Sunny 4 chipped marbles...1 stale twinkie...pair old rusty roller skates...and a can of WD40....now, gimme the dull knife!


I do lurk a lot and just wanted to say thanx for what everyone does on a daily basis here on scared monkeys.There isn't a day that goes by that someone doesn't make me smile and laugh.For that i'm thankful today!!! ::MonkeyWink::

Keepthefaith

Every Monkey has their own unique contribution to the cage.  Come in and post more on Danger Island.  It's a little less dangerous now, the police are on strike.  They had to tell us or we would never know.  How can they tell?


It seems many are taking advantage of the opportunity that Natalee has afforded them.Kinda ironic for those people who bashed Natalee.Seems she's changing a nation,and or Danger Island.Many people on aruba should be thankful for the positive change she has,and will bring to so many lives.While she's changing lives for the better.The VDS family is still trying to get theres.Them are some real sick people.


Keepthefaith

You got that right.  Did you mean sick or slick?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: oldfart on March 12, 2008, 06:52:04 PM
LDStLou

Sorry I'm running late with this    (http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c314/OldF/f4289d09.gif) 
I just now listened to Dana's show... and at about 48 min. into it  your segment starts.
BTW  you have an excellent Radio voice  and seemed very calm and ::MonkeyCool::

You did an excellent job explaining how your and Sunny's supporters came away as Natalee supporters and the thoughts of local law enforcement that had to do their job and move you around a bit ... The anaology for the scouts was a great idea..I hope you continue to explore that concept with them.

And as Dana stated  you (http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c314/OldF/kickass.gif)




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: SunnyinTX on March 12, 2008, 06:53:34 PM
tabloid gossip magazine Privé reporting Joran is in a mental clinic near Dutch city of Utrecht.
also interview with Beth in their upcoming issue.

http://www.prive.nl/

thanks.....someone has to know where that piece of slime is.....he can't hide out forever.....has anyone checked to see of he ahs been on his facebook or whatever recently


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 12, 2008, 06:54:45 PM
I believe that between Joran's June 9, 2005 suspect statement and ... his June 14, 2005 suspect statement ... Joran made the decision for some reason conceal that fact that he actually wore white shoes on the morning of May 30, 2005.

Janet

++++++++++

“NO MAN HAS A GOOD ENOUGH MEMORY TO MAKE A SUCCESSFUL LIAR.”
Abraham Lincoln

Joran van der Sloot
Suspect Statement
June 9, 2005


To your question as to what clothes I was wearing when I was picked up by Deepak and Satish, I can answer the following. I wore a white/blue shirt, a blue/white jeans trouser or a three-quart black trouser and a couple of white shoes or crème coloured boots.


Joran van der Sloot
Suspect Statement
June 14, 2005


I told Deepak that I left my shoes at the Marriot Hotel. Deepak told me not to worry that he would go back the next day and pick them up for me. I had left a pair of white and blue shoes of the make "K-Swiss", size "14" on the beach. These shoes I bought in the USA.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: SunnyinTX on March 12, 2008, 06:56:07 PM
tabloid gossip magazine Privé reporting Joran is in a mental clinic near Dutch city of Utrecht.
also interview with Beth in their upcoming issue.

http://www.prive.nl/

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/JoranCuckoo-1.jpg)

 ::MonkeyLaugh:: thanks Klaas I neeed a good laugh this afternoon!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on March 12, 2008, 07:02:49 PM
Segment with Drew Peterson is over.  Dana mostly just had a conversation with Drew Peterson, Dana did not interrogate him. 

thanks Klaas...I can't even stand to hear his voice....I'd love to cut his bxlls off!!!

Oh geeze...I'll trade you 4 marbles... a twinkie from my lunch...and, my roller skates..if...if... if you let me cut just one off...puleeezzzzze...huh...wouldja...huh????

Oh you push a hard bargain....OK...you got one ::MonkeyLaugh::

Awright...hands Sunny 4 chipped marbles...1 stale twinkie...pair old rusty roller skates...and a can of WD40....now, gimme the dull knife!


I do lurk a lot and just wanted to say thanx for what everyone does on a daily basis here on scared monkeys.There isn't a day that goes by that someone doesn't make me smile and laugh.For that i'm thankful today!!! ::MonkeyWink::

Keepthefaith

Every Monkey has their own unique contribution to the cage.  Come in and post more on Danger Island.  It's a little less dangerous now, the police are on strike.  They had to tell us or we would never know.  How can they tell?


It seems many are taking advantage of the opportunity that Natalee has afforded them.Kinda ironic for those people who bashed Natalee.Seems she's changing a nation,and or Danger Island.Many people on aruba should be thankful for the positive change she has,and will bring to so many lives.While she's changing lives for the better.The VDS family is still trying to get theres.Them are some real sick people.


Keepthefaith

You got that right.  Did you mean sick or slick?


Definitly sick... ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on March 12, 2008, 07:30:36 PM
tabloid gossip magazine Privé reporting Joran is in a mental clinic near Dutch city of Utrecht.
also interview with Beth in their upcoming issue.

http://www.prive.nl/

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/JoranCuckoo-1.jpg)

 ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Maggie on March 12, 2008, 07:40:44 PM

I don't understand why CafePress will no longer sell items with Natalee's picture. Did they mention why?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 12, 2008, 07:55:21 PM

I don't understand why CafePress will no longer sell items with Natalee's picture. Did they mention why?

They have never allowed us to use Natalee's photo.  It's possible that early in the case they might have allowed it but her face is well known now.  This is from the Cafepress website:

Examples of Prohibited Content

In accordance with intellectual property laws, CafePress has certain rules regarding the types of merchandise that you can make and sell through its service. For example:

NO UNOFFICIAL MERCHANDISE, such as professional sports teams, videogame or Olympics merchandise.
NO use of names, logos, pictures or other intellectual property of musical groups or musical artists. For example, you cannot make Britney Spears merchandise simply because you run a fan-based Britney Spears website or just because you downloaded her image from an internet website. You also cannot modify the name or other intellectual property of a musical group and avoid infringement, (e.g., using Metalika instead of Metallica).
NO use of names, logos, pictures, or other intellectual property of sports teams, colleges/universities, clubs, or organizations such as the Los Angeles Lakers, Harvard University, or The Boy Scouts. Modifications may not avoid infringement.
NO photos, logos, caricatures, or other artwork depicting celebrities, such as Michael Jackson or Madonna, or other third parties. Just because you take a photograph of a celebrity does not give you the right to use that photograph on merchandise, even if you digitally manipulate the photograph. Political figures are permissible because there is an exception to the general rule for political figures.
NO use of trademarks, names, or logos of companies. For example, you cannot use the name of a company such as Nike or company logo such as the Nike "swoosh" trademark.
NO pictures or photographs of products (such as toys). Even if you own a product, trademark laws may still prohibit you from selling merchandise that features pictures of it. For example, you cannot take a picture of your Barbie and sell Barbie merchandise with that picture.


http://www.cafepress.com/cp/info/help/cup.aspx#prohibit


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 12, 2008, 08:17:03 PM
JUNIOR - "THE FATHER CAME IN THE JEEP."

Aruba Cops Search Dutch Suspect's Home
Wednesday, June 15, 2005
FOX NEWS

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,159601,00.html

Two police officers walked through the Van Der Sloot family's one-story, yellow-beige home, while others guarded the entranceway. A blue sport utility vehicle and a red Jeep were also towed from the property.


Junior - The Landfill Witness
On the Record w/ Greta
August 4, 2005


VAN SUSTEREN: What is his level of certainty?
 
JUNIOR: Am I certain?  Yes, I am really sure.  That is why I think, today, “I’m sure, I’m sure. I have no doubt in my mind.” Yes. Also the father, I believe, yes, yes. Also him. I was even more sure it was this girl because now there were two cars. The Police have two cars--the red Jeep, which… I saw that. I saw that because the red Jeep was fine, but that came later, that was the next day. I was near the place where she was buried--may she rest in peace. I was there, maybe, nine days later.

VAN SUSTEREN: If there were three, does the father make four, or, is the father one of the three?
 
JUNIOR: The father came in the Jeep. He got out of the car. He was standing there and he was pointing and asking things. I was working, you know, but he was far and he was talking. I was just working and looking. He kept asking if everything was okay. Yes, they asked him. I thought that they were asking him, that is what I thought they were doing, asking him, “Where? Where?”


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Magnolia on March 12, 2008, 08:21:45 PM
I'm not trying to be rude....but where is our *******?
I miss him and I am worried about him.
Just asking.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 12, 2008, 08:25:06 PM
Was the suspect who made the June 10, 2000 confession ... the confession that was retracted ... unaware that Natalee Holloway's remains had been moved.

Janet

++++++++++

Jossy Mansur
Geraldo At Large
July 31, 2005


... The letter that we received is from the wife of the person with whom this guy was on the beach with between the Holiday Inn and Marriott wrote us because she was getting a annoyed that no one was paying attention to the declaration that this man gave to her husband at the hotel.

I will read it for you... The day after Natalee was missing a person called Barbeshe (Bar-Be-she) told a story that the night before he saw 3 people in front of the Holiday Inn with a girl's body. That they tried to take a towel from one the "walks fence's" (really hard to understand him here - sounds like he says "water sports dance or fence") to wrap the body and they could not get it down. Then one of them went to the garbage cans at the Holiday Inn and pulled the bags out and wrapped the body, then put her in the white pick-up and left. They went out and turned left towards the lighthouse and turned off on a dirt road and dug a hole and put her in it and threw out the shovel. He also said he told the police and they sent him on a 4 wheeler to try and find, locate the spot and he had been threatened by these people. This person has been seen on the beach everyday has no longer been seen after this and was known to be there daily.


Gerold Dompig
CBS NEWS
June 20, 2005

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/06/10/national/main700829.shtml

Holloway's family rushed late Friday to an old stone lighthouse beside Arisha beach after Deputy Police Commissioner Gerold Dompig told The Associated Press that one of three young men in custody admitted that "something bad happened" to Holloway and was leading police to the scene of the alleged crime.


Spokesperson - Aruban Minister of Justice
FOX NEWS/ASSOCIATED PRESS
June 11, 2005

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,159252,00.html

David Cruz, a spokesman for the Aruban Minister of Justice (search) told FOX News Natalee Holloway (search), who was on vacation with friends with a graduation trip when she disappeared, was confirmed dead and that authorities knew the location of her body.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 12, 2008, 08:26:42 PM
I'm not trying to be rude....but where is our *******?
I miss him and I am worried about him.
Just asking.

Me too Magnolia.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: hotping on March 12, 2008, 08:34:12 PM
I'm not trying to be rude....but where is our *******?
I miss him and I am worried about him.
Just asking.

Me too Magnolia.

Janet
I Miss Him Too Janet and Magnolia!  ::MonkeyWaa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 12, 2008, 08:36:38 PM
I miss him too


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 12, 2008, 08:55:37 PM
“NO MAN HAS A GOOD ENOUGH MEMORY TO MAKE A SUCCESSFUL LIAR.”Abraham Lincoln


Paulus van der Sloot
Witness Statement
June 18, 2005


Between 17.00 hours and 18.30 hours, I dropped off Joran in front of the entrance of the Aruba Raquet Club with my Suzuki so that he could take tennis lessons and go to the gym. He probably had his carrying bag with tennis necessities with him. I saw him enter the building. He had told me that he would afterwards be going to the Wyndham Hotel because a “Free Carribean Stud Tournament” would be held. I immediately went home, had dinner with the other boys and after that I went to bed.


Paulus van der Sloot
Suspect Statement
June 25, 2005


We spoke last time about that Monday night when Joran was at the "Raquet Club", that I only took the bag with me. I am remembering that it was around 08:00pm when I took the bag to Joran at the “Raquet Club”, this was when Joran was walking in the direction of the Marriott and made the announcement that he was going to participate in the “Free Tournament” at the Wyndham that this came up. In my view I even grumbled (expressed concern) on Joran and then went on to pick up Sebastian at the ZEOLA family.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on March 12, 2008, 09:06:36 PM
“NO MAN HAS A GOOD ENOUGH MEMORY TO MAKE A SUCCESSFUL LIAR.”Abraham Lincoln


Paulus van der Sloot
Witness Statement
June 18, 2005


Between 17.00 hours and 18.30  hours, I dropped off Joran in front of the entrance of the Aruba Raquet Club with my Suzuki so that he could take tennis lessons and go to the gym. He probably had his carrying bag with tennis necessities with him.  I saw him enter the building. He had told me that he would afterwards be going to the Wyndham Hotel because a “Free Carribean Stud Tournament” would be held. I immediately went home, had dinner with the other boys and after that I went to bed.


Paulus van der Sloot
Suspect Statement
June 25, 2005


We spoke last time about that Monday night when Joran was at the "Raquet Club", that I only took the bag with me. I am remembering that it was around 08:00pm when I took the bag to Joran at the “Raquet Club”, this was when Joran was walking in the direction of the Marriott and made the announcement that he was going to participate in the “Free Tournament” at the Wyndham that this came up. In my view I even grumbled (expressed concern) on Joran and then went on to pick up Sebastian at the ZEOLA family.

He just can't keep his lies straight.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Blue Moon on March 12, 2008, 09:18:25 PM
I miss him too

I miss him also.  Very kind to me, always comments on my comments, I do appreciate him.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: sharon on March 12, 2008, 09:28:46 PM
Hey Monkeys, Hi!!
One of our posters has had a line across the bottom of her posts that said something like...
Avoid Aruba as if your life depends on it....it Does!!

I would like to ask that poster if I could use her comment on a sign I want to make for the Houston Travel Show. I think it was Sharon but Im not sure about that. Please email me at njackson1245@neto.com and let me know if it's ok to use that, whoever had it.
Thanks much!
Wishing a great day for all our Monkeys!

I Stand With The Girl


It would be my privilege. Please use it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 12, 2008, 09:34:23 PM
I miss him too

I miss him also.  Very kind to me, always comments on my comments, I do appreciate him.

Just to make it clear, ******* is not banned. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: hotping on March 12, 2008, 09:38:29 PM
I miss him too

I miss him also.  Very kind to me, always comments on my comments, I do appreciate him.

Just to make it clear, ******* is not banned. 
Thank You..Klaas for letting Us Know!  ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Linda in MD on March 12, 2008, 09:40:56 PM
Klaas,
Have you seen the political cartoon in Diario?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 12, 2008, 09:44:18 PM
I miss him too

I miss him also.  Very kind to me, always comments on my comments, I do appreciate him.

Just to make it clear, ******* is not banned. 

It is very discouraging when you give your all to the cause of justice for Natalee and ... then your integrity is negated through accusations.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2694.new#new


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 12, 2008, 09:48:15 PM
Klaas,
Have you seen the political cartoon in Diario?


This one?

(http://news.diario-aruba.com//images/stories/2008N/maart/12/car.jpg)

A little info from Amigoe:

Henny Eman acquitted

A heavy emotional Henny Eman (right) embracing his brother Mike (AVP-leader) after he was acquitted in the Fondo Desaroyo Nobo criminal case.

ORANJESTAD – The former Prime Minister Henny Eman (AVP) is acquitted from violating the Compatibility Ordinance (budget law).  The judge gave verdict this morning in the huge corruption case Fondo Desaroyo Nobo (FDN).  Former-minister Tico Croes, also AVP, got 10 months unconditional imprisonment, which was turned into a conditional punishment with 240 hours community service.

“Finally peace for my family; they have been attacked and harassed for seven long years.  There is still justice”, said Henny.  Mike Eman wants to have the Public Prosecutor and acting procurator general Nico Jörg investigated.  “They should have never allowed this case to be brought up.”  He mentioned the OM’s course of actions in this case to the Representation of the Netherlands.  “They must send a Dutch committee to look into this.”  The family Eman was always convinced that this was a political persecution of the former premier of Aruba.  The OM demanded four months conditional imprisonment and 120 hours community service.  The judge gave verdict in all the 16 criminal cases today.  The verdicts were not out yet at the time this paper went to press.


(http://www.amigoe.com/english/images/03-11-Rechtszaak-Eman.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Magnolia on March 12, 2008, 09:48:26 PM
I miss him too

I miss him also.  Very kind to me, always comments on my comments, I do appreciate him.

Just to make it clear, ******* is not banned. 

Thank you, Klass.  Maybe he will come back soon.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 12, 2008, 09:50:14 PM
Janet - I agree


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Blue Moon on March 12, 2008, 09:53:27 PM
I miss him too

I miss him also.  Very kind to me, always comments on my comments, I do appreciate him.

Just to make it clear, ******* is not banned. 

Thanks, good to know.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: private eye on March 12, 2008, 10:01:59 PM
I miss him too

I miss him also.  Very kind to me, always comments on my comments, I do appreciate him.

Just to make it clear, ******* is not banned. 

It is very discouraging when you give your all to the cause of justice for Natalee and ... then your integrity is negated through accusations.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2694.new#new


Observers integrety and support for Natalee is above reproach in my opinion. He "Stands Tall With The Girl" day in and day out, from dusk to dawn, 110%. He makes me feel like I am not enthusiastic enough in my support for Natalee:) Who in the hell questioned his integrity?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Linda in MD on March 12, 2008, 10:02:36 PM
Klaas,
Oh, I thought the cartoon showed Nel trying to stay out of prison.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 12, 2008, 10:07:41 PM
Klaas,
Oh, I thought the cartoon showed Nel trying to stay out of prison.

I think it's implying now that Henny is free, he will go after Nel


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Linda in MD on March 12, 2008, 10:09:03 PM
HeHeHe


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: anidac on March 12, 2008, 10:14:04 PM
Did yesterday scare everyone out of the cage tonight or what?  I finaly have the house to myself and time to hang out in here and POOF!  It is a slow night. LOL ::MonkeyTongue::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Shell on March 12, 2008, 10:17:53 PM
I miss him too

I miss him also.  Very kind to me, always comments on my comments, I do appreciate him.

Always kind to me as well and an important part of this forum. I hope all is okay with him.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 12, 2008, 10:19:35 PM
PE...this may sound very *dumb*..but it's been on my mind for about an hour...so, tossing it out there...

Can anyone who lives on/near Aruba, set up an internet chat board for the *poor disgruntled minions* to post/vent about the current unrest in Aruba?  I would be more than glad to help fund it!   Just imagine what kinds of things folks could/would post....especially if they are *mad as hell* and want to get back at *the powers that be*....yup...*hungry* folks will complain....

One heck of a great idea Destiny. If the blog/forum were US based there is jack the Arubans could do about it.

Well...I do have an open account with Monster.com...I have 2 websites...with all the bells and whistles I'm not using...I just don't have the time to manage it with my Business...whatcha think...eh?  I'll keep paying for the site...if someone *trustworthy* manages it...and it is *dedicated* to the issues mentioned above... we need tick out a domain name for the site...I'll procure it....just thinking here....

Arubaiwantmymoney.com

Also...need to find out how much Jossy would charge for a nice display ad to promote it in Aruba...hahahhaha...I'm a mean Monkey...NOT!


Destiny, the trick would be making it accessible to Arubans and making sure they were comfortable posting. Heck, they could post here if they felt comfortable but they harbor a lot of fear I am sure. Another problem is the language barrier, I would bet most of the oppressed people on the island speak Papi or some other non-English language.

One last challenge would be to create awareness of the forum, would have to figure out a way to let them know.

I do not want to step on anybody's toes, Red may have some thoughts on how to reach the oppressed people of Aruba and give them a voice here on SM.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 12, 2008, 10:21:07 PM
Did yesterday scare everyone out of the cage tonight or what?  I finaly have the house to myself and time to hang out in here and POOF!  It is a slow night. LOL ::MonkeyTongue::

anidac ... hubby is getting out the deck of cards for a game of 500 Rummy right this moment.

Last night we went down memory lane with Daniel O'Donnell on the Public Broadcasting channel.

A few slow nights in the Monkey Cage may prove to be good thing ... kind of reconnecting.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet
7:20 PM


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 12, 2008, 10:23:19 PM
“NO MAN HAS A GOOD ENOUGH MEMORY TO MAKE A SUCCESSFUL LIAR.”Abraham Lincoln


Paulus van der Sloot
Witness Statement
June 18, 2005


Between 17.00 hours and 18.30  hours, I dropped off Joran in front of the entrance of the Aruba Raquet Club with my Suzuki so that he could take tennis lessons and go to the gym. He probably had his carrying bag with tennis necessities with him.  I saw him enter the building. He had told me that he would afterwards be going to the Wyndham Hotel because a “Free Carribean Stud Tournament” would be held. I immediately went home, had dinner with the other boys and after that I went to bed.


Paulus van der Sloot
Suspect Statement
June 25, 2005


We spoke last time about that Monday night when Joran was at the "Raquet Club", that I only took the bag with me. I am remembering that it was around 08:00pm when I took the bag to Joran at the “Raquet Club”, this was when Joran was walking in the direction of the Marriott and made the announcement that he was going to participate in the “Free Tournament” at the Wyndham that this came up. In my view I even grumbled (expressed concern) on Joran and then went on to pick up Sebastian at the ZEOLA family.

He just can't keep his lies straight.


And of course the Dutch judges don't give a crap whether they lie or not. Joran got a get out of jail free card and a trip to Holland for lying. Holland needs to give their judicial system in Aruba and Curacao an enema, they are making the mother country look bad.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: anidac on March 12, 2008, 10:25:46 PM
Did yesterday scare everyone out of the cage tonight or what?  I finaly have the house to myself and time to hang out in here and POOF!  It is a slow night. LOL ::MonkeyTongue::

anidac ... hubby is getting out the deck of cards for a game of 500 Rummy right this moment.

Last night we went down memory lane with Daniel O'Donnell on the Public Broadcasting channel.

A few slow nights in the Monkey Cage may prove to be good thing ... kind of reconnecting.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet
7:20 PM


I remember back when I couldn't be torn away from the Cage day or night.  You are very right in our comment.  My problem tonight is I have worked hard to find time to "Disconnet" if you know what I mean.  Work...Family...all that....  Enjoy the evening.  I will be lurking between GuildWar battles tonight. ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 12, 2008, 10:26:04 PM
LDStLou

Sorry I'm running late with this    (http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c314/OldF/f4289d09.gif) 
I just now listened to Dana's show... and at about 48 min. into it  your segment starts.
BTW  you have an excellent Radio voice  and seemed very calm and ::MonkeyCool::

You did an excellent job explaining how your and Sunny's supporters came away as Natalee supporters and the thoughts of local law enforcement that had to do their job and move you around a bit ... The anaology for the scouts was a great idea..I hope you continue to explore that concept with them.

And as Dana stated  you (http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c314/OldF/kickass.gif)



I agree with OldFart here Lisa, great voice and very articulate you were. You Monks did a fabulous job!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 12, 2008, 10:27:17 PM
******* ... COME BACK!!!

NOBODY ELSE IN THIS CAGE OPENly SUPPORTS ME IN THE LANDFILL THEORY!!!

PLEASE DO NOT LEAVE ME ALONE!!!

 ::MonkeyWaa::

Janet

P.S> I promise not to preach for a whole week.

 ::MonkeyWink::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Blue Moon on March 12, 2008, 10:30:16 PM
Did yesterday scare everyone out of the cage tonight or what?  I finaly have the house to myself and time to hang out in here and POOF!  It is a slow night. LOL ::MonkeyTongue::

It is slow tonight for sure.  Has there been much info from our Dutch monkeys today?  I am reading here and have my genealogy research page open on another tab.  BUT I do stand with the girl ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: MuffyBee on March 12, 2008, 10:31:51 PM
Call out to ******* from MuffyBee:   Please come back to the cage.  


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 12, 2008, 10:32:39 PM

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/JoranCuckoo-1.jpg)
[/quote]


There is something eerily natural about this pic class. Joran just seems to fit in seamlessly.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 12, 2008, 10:37:06 PM
http://www.amigoe.com/english/

(http://www.amigoe.com/english/images/03-11-Staking-Protestloop.jpg)

Civil servants walked out for more salary


I got news for these people, Aruba ain't got no money.



Sounds like a VERY good time to remind Aruba's "common folk" about any uncollected Reward Monies....as long as their feeling the pinch in their wallets from the lack of tourism....don't ya think?    ::MonkeyCool::

ocgirl
(signing off and going back to work!)



Better yet OCgirl, get the ALE cops to spill their guts and they can use the reward money to pay for their raises. Am sure at least one of them knows where Van der Straten helped Paulus with the disposal.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Shell on March 12, 2008, 10:42:11 PM
As Dompig says, everyone knows everyone and nobody can do things on that island without people knowing. (or something like that)

I am not sure who all knows, but plenty of people know (IMHO) and are not telling. Maybe they don't want to end up with their hand in their packet and their feet dangling in the air.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: jackb on March 12, 2008, 10:47:08 PM
Looks like Joran was wearing this or something very similar when he was at the Casino that night (I used this pic to test the size of his shoe to his forearm, lol )


(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/joranshoeforearm.jpg)

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/ABC11-1.jpg)

I realize the shoe size has been over analyzed, but . . . if that is a folded up newspaper Joran is holding, it basically solves the riddle.  That would be a 10 1/2 ish, but could NEVER be construed as a 14!

CBB, Thank you for my beautiful Easter frock.   ::MonkeyWink::
 

He wears at least a 14 unless he has midget arms.  Jack Blue


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 12, 2008, 10:50:06 PM
Jackb - I agree with you on Joran's shoe size, he wears a 14.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Blue Moon on March 12, 2008, 10:51:46 PM
I think (my opinion only) that the Kalpoes are getting a free pass here.  THEY were involved (I think) to a certain degree here and Joran's convenient confession failed to implicate anyone except himself.  I still feel like that confession was for the benefit of the Kalpoe's lawsuit so they in turn could pay Joran, his father, Aruba etc. for all the money problems they have incurred in this disaster.  AHATA orchestrated this whole lawsuit (MO) so everyone could make a few bucks. ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: jackb on March 12, 2008, 10:54:29 PM
Looks like Joran was wearing this or something very similar when he was at the Casino that night (I used this pic to test the size of his shoe to his forearm, lol ), ,


(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/joranshoeforearm.jpg)

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/ABC11-1.jpg)
 



I realize the shoe size has been over analyzed, but . . . if that is a folded up newspaper Joran is holding, it basically solves the riddle.  That would be a 10 1/2 ish, but could NEVER be construed as a 14!

CBB, Thank you for my beautiful Easter frock.   ::MonkeyWink::
 

He wears at least a 14 unless he has midget arms.  Jack Blue
 
That is a sign behind Joran, Sherlock, not a "folded newspaper"  There is another such sign to the other side of Joran.  It is highly unlikely Joran ever sees a newspaper as it is hard to read anything for such people that is why they watch a lot of videos.  In his case unless the newspapers have pron in them, he wouldn't bother.  Jack Blue


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 12, 2008, 10:55:43 PM
Good Night Monkeys

Janet
8:00 PM


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 12, 2008, 10:57:44 PM
Nite Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: hotping on March 12, 2008, 10:58:31 PM
Good Night Janet!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 12, 2008, 11:01:14 PM
Looks like Joran was wearing this or something very similar when he was at the Casino that night (I used this pic to test the size of his shoe to his forearm, lol ), ,


(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/joranshoeforearm.jpg)

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/ABC11-1.jpg)
 



I realize the shoe size has been over analyzed, but . . . if that is a folded up newspaper Joran is holding, it basically solves the riddle.  That would be a 10 1/2 ish, but could NEVER be construed as a 14!

CBB, Thank you for my beautiful Easter frock.   ::MonkeyWink::
 

He wears at least a 14 unless he has midget arms.  Jack Blue
 
That is a sign behind Joran, Sherlock, not a "folded newspaper"  There is another such sign to the other side of Joran.  It is highly unlikely Joran ever sees a newspaper as it is hard to read anything for such people that is why they watch a lot of videos.  In his case unless the newspapers have pron in them, he wouldn't bother.  Jack Blue


Jackb - yes that is a sign, not a paper.  The red square area is where I took the shoe from that picture and rotated and placed it on his forearm.  We were trying to figure out the size shoes.

If someone lives near that mall in Florida they could check the height of those metal poles and we could get a pretty good idea then the lenght of Joran's shoes.  I still say he has to wear a 14 or so, no way a 10 1/2.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on March 12, 2008, 11:02:04 PM
I miss him too

I miss him also.  Very kind to me, always comments on my comments, I do appreciate him.

Just to make it clear, ******* is not banned. 

It is very discouraging when you give your all to the cause of justice for Natalee and ... then your integrity is negated through accusations.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2694.new#new


Observers integrety and support for Natalee is above reproach in my opinion. He "Stands Tall With The Girl" day in and day out, from dusk to dawn, 110%. He makes me feel like I am not enthusiastic enough in my support for Natalee:) Who in the hell questioned his integrity?

Don't know if you saw private eye.Few pages back i gave you a link for direct mail in Aruba.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: jackb on March 12, 2008, 11:02:20 PM
tabloid gossip magazine Privé reporting Joran is in a mental clinic near Dutch city of Utrecht.
also interview with Beth in their upcoming issue.

http://www.prive.nl/

didn't svetlana or whatever her name was (joran's ghostwriter that he was MSM'ing with during the days of the devries brouhaha) write for that rag?
 

Somebody get this girl a "stand with the girl" shirt, quick, she 'bout got her mojo working.
  Jack blue (blushing)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Blue Moon on March 12, 2008, 11:04:09 PM
Good nite all. Hang in there.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 12, 2008, 11:07:08 PM
I think (my opinion only) that the Kalpoes are getting a free pass here.  THEY were involved (I think) to a certain degree here and Joran's convenient confession failed to implicate anyone except himself.  I still feel like that confession was for the benefit of the Kalpoe's lawsuit so they in turn could pay Joran, his father, Aruba etc. for all the money problems they have incurred in this disaster.  AHATA orchestrated this whole lawsuit (MO) so everyone could make a few bucks. ::MonkeyNoNo::

No free pass from me  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: anidac on March 12, 2008, 11:11:37 PM
Winking out for the night.  Stay safe!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on March 12, 2008, 11:16:18 PM
I think (my opinion only) that the Kalpoes are getting a free pass here.  THEY were involved (I think) to a certain degree here and Joran's convenient confession failed to implicate anyone except himself.  I still feel like that confession was for the benefit of the Kalpoe's lawsuit so they in turn could pay Joran, his father, Aruba etc. for all the money problems they have incurred in this disaster.  AHATA orchestrated this whole lawsuit (MO) so everyone could make a few bucks. ::MonkeyNoNo::

No free pass from me  ::MonkeyWink::

Second that Klaas.They need hip-waders cause the s**t is waist deep and gettin deeper. ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 12, 2008, 11:17:10 PM
Winking out for the night.  Stay safe!

Nite Anidac


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: jackb on March 12, 2008, 11:26:36 PM
Jackb - I agree with you on Joran's shoe size, he wears a 14.
Scarlet thought the sign behind Joran was a folded newspaper under his arem.
Yes, the shoe extends beyond the bend of his elbow almost to his hand.  He has some arms on him too.  Yes, at least a 14.  The LE know it.  They simply refuse to prosecute that murdering scumbag and friends and families.    Jack blue 



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: bluwaters on March 12, 2008, 11:38:00 PM
does anyone know which mall in Florida is the location of the photo of Joran?
I am in FL. It's a big state with many malls! Was it in Orlando? That would narrow it down some.


I have no idea what the accusations are about between some of our monkeys. I miss ******* too. I have also really appreciated Anna's posts.
It's really a shame that something bad went down.  ::MonkeyNoNo::
I don't even want to know...but it sure is different here now.

We need some news!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 12, 2008, 11:39:54 PM
does anyone know which mall in Florida is the location of the photo of Joran?
I am in FL. It's a big state with many malls! Was it in Orlando? That would narrow it down some.


I have no idea what the accusations are about between some of our monkeys. I miss ******* too. I have also really appreciated Anna's posts.
It's really a shame that something bad went down.  ::MonkeyNoNo::
I don't even want to know...but it sure is different here now.

We need some news!!!

Someone said they knew but I can't remember the name.  I think I can get a pretty good fix on the location.  Hold on a sec, let me search for something.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: texasmom on March 12, 2008, 11:43:48 PM
I miss him too

I miss him also.  Very kind to me, always comments on my comments, I do appreciate him.

Just to make it clear, ******* is not banned. 

It is very discouraging when you give your all to the cause of justice for Natalee and ... then your integrity is negated through accusations.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2694.new#new


Observers integrety and support for Natalee is above reproach in my opinion. He "Stands Tall With The Girl" day in and day out, from dusk to dawn, 110%. He makes me feel like I am not enthusiastic enough in my support for Natalee:) Who in the hell questioned his integrity?

Private Eye,
I agree with every word of your post.  ******* is truly a Warrior in the fight for Justice for Natalee and her family. 

Every Moderator in this forum has dedicated more of their lives to this cause than any of us will ever know.  You cannot spend the time and energy here day in day out, night in and night out without it becoming a part of your soul.   

I have written and erased a book as to what to say about all of this and could probably do so all night long.....this is just NOT RIGHT! :gaah:

Although ******* is not "banned" from the forum I understand why he's not here, and I would probably feel the same if I were in his position.  That doesn't stop me from missing him though........
 :smt090 :smt009 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: hotping on March 12, 2008, 11:45:57 PM
I STAND WITH *******!  ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Destiny on March 12, 2008, 11:49:40 PM
I'm not trying to be rude....but where is our *******?
I miss him and I am worried about him.
Just asking.

DITTO!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 12, 2008, 11:50:23 PM
does anyone know which mall in Florida is the location of the photo of Joran?
I am in FL. It's a big state with many malls! Was it in Orlando? That would narrow it down some.


I have no idea what the accusations are about between some of our monkeys. I miss ******* too. I have also really appreciated Anna's posts.
It's really a shame that something bad went down.  ::MonkeyNoNo::
I don't even want to know...but it sure is different here now.

We need some news!!!

Someone said they knew but I can't remember the name.  I think I can get a pretty good fix on the location.  Hold on a sec, let me search for something.


I'm pretty sure on that trip he went to Busch Gardens in Tampa:

http://www.buschgardens.com/BGT/



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: texasmom on March 12, 2008, 11:55:08 PM
I STAND WITH *******!  ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

 ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::  MONKEYS STAND WITH THEIR MODS!!!!!  ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: hotping on March 12, 2008, 11:57:17 PM
I STAND WITH *******!  ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

 ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::  MONKEYS STAND WITH THEIR MODS!!!!!  ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::
YOU BET WE DO!  ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyWink:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Destiny on March 13, 2008, 12:00:19 AM
******* ... COME BACK!!!

NOBODY ELSE IN THIS CAGE OPENly SUPPORTS ME IN THE LANDFILL THEORY!!!

PLEASE DO NOT LEAVE ME ALONE!!!

 ::MonkeyWaa::

Janet

P.S> I promise not to preach for a whole week.

 ::MonkeyWink::



JANET...I second that motion!!! *******......COME BACK!!!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Magnolia on March 13, 2008, 12:01:41 AM
I know this is crazy....but I got out my measuring tape  ::MonkeyLaugh::

I measured the height of Joran on the picture which was 6 1/4 inches
Then I measured the shoe which was 3/4 inch;  then divided
6.25 by .75
Then took Joran's actual height which is 6'5", I think and converted that
to inches which is 77"

Then I went to the international conversion chart for shoes to get the
length of the different sizes and I think he wears a 10.5 ::MonkeyTongue::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 13, 2008, 12:08:09 AM
Magnolia - I know it's possible but it would be unusual for Joran to wear size 10.5 at his height. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: GabbyG on March 13, 2008, 12:08:18 AM
Hey Monkeys, Hi!!
One of our posters has had a line across the bottom of her posts that said something like...
Avoid Aruba as if your life depends on it....it Does!!

I would like to ask that poster if I could use her comment on a sign I want to make for the Houston Travel Show. I think it was Sharon but Im not sure about that. Please email me at njackson1245@neto.com and let me know if it's ok to use that, whoever had it.
Thanks much!
Wishing a great day for all our Monkeys!

I Stand With The Girl


It would be my privilege. Please use it.

Thanks so much sharon! Your comment makes a very important and profound statement. My idea for the sign is to use the name ARUBA with the red circle around it and line through it, like the No Smoking signs, (like what we have seen on the T shirts at the Monkey store), and then put your comment below that. It's a message people need to hear, and think about.
Thanks again!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Destiny on March 13, 2008, 12:13:46 AM
I STAND WITH *******!  ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

Hotping...YOU and *******....ROCK!!!!! ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Magnolia on March 13, 2008, 12:16:08 AM
Magnolia - I know it's possible but it would be unusual for Joran to wear size 10.5 at his height. 

Well now Klaas, I have a friend who's husband is 6'4" and he wears a
size 10.  You know what they say about foot sizes.  That could be one of
Joran's problems
 ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 13, 2008, 12:17:07 AM
Magnolia - I know it's possible but it would be unusual for Joran to wear size 10.5 at his height. 

Well now Klaas, I have a friend who's husband is 6'4" and he wears a
size 10.  You know what they say about foot sizes.  That could be one of
Joran's problems
 ::MonkeyLaugh::

 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Destiny on March 13, 2008, 12:21:47 AM
Klaas..I'm sure this is an awkward question on my part...please delete if so...but, why was the tread you opened for the ********/Anna* issue locked...

TIA....not trying to cause problems...just trying to figure them out....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: hotping on March 13, 2008, 12:21:47 AM
I STAND WITH *******!  ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

Hotping...YOU and *******....ROCK!!!!! ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

Thank You Destiny! I Bet You "STAND WE *******" Also..Right! Then let's let Him Know...******* ******* *******!!!!!  ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: bluwaters on March 13, 2008, 12:22:40 AM

I'm pretty sure on that trip he went to Busch Gardens in Tampa:

http://www.buschgardens.com/BGT/


Thanks Klaas!
Hmm, that narrows it down to... 50 or so possibilities...

Magnolia said:

Quote
I measured the height of Joran on the picture which was 6 1/4 inches
Then I measured the shoe which was 3/4 inch;  then divided
6.25 by .75
Then took Joran's actual height which is 6'5", I think and converted that
to inches which is 77"

Then I went to the international conversion chart for shoes to get the
length of the different sizes and I think he wears a 10.5

Magnolia, this sounds very logical to me! The only thing that doesn't make sense to me is that Joran's feet look big. DH is not nearly as tall as Joran and he wears a size 10, as does DS, also under 6'...

But the measuring technique seems more scientific...

I feel really  bad that I never told ******* how much appreciation I had for him and his dedication for justice for Natalee   ::MonkeyWaa::
I hope that he is just taking a break to refresh and will soon be back, rarin' to go!!!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 13, 2008, 12:24:09 AM
Klaas..I'm sure this is an awkward question on my part...please delete if so...but, why was the tread you opened for the ********/Anna* issue locked...

TIA....not trying to cause problems...just trying to figure them out....

******* locked both of those threads.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: texasmom on March 13, 2008, 12:26:01 AM
I STAND WITH *******!  ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

Hotping...YOU and *******....ROCK!!!!! ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: DITTO!!! ::MonkeyDance::  ::MonkeyDance::  ::MonkeyDance:: uh oh I feel a shout out coming!!!!! ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: hotping on March 13, 2008, 12:28:41 AM
I STAND WITH *******!  ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

Hotping...YOU and *******....ROCK!!!!! ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

Ready and Waiting TM...Let Er Rip!  ::MonkeyWink::
 ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: DITTO!!! ::MonkeyDance::  ::MonkeyDance::  ::MonkeyDance:: uh oh I feel a shout out coming!!!!! ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: bluwaters on March 13, 2008, 12:32:15 AM
Magnolia - I know it's possible but it would be unusual for Joran to wear size 10.5 at his height. 

Well now Klaas, I have a friend who's husband is 6'4" and he wears a
size 10.  You know what they say about foot sizes.  That could be one of
Joran's problems
 ::MonkeyLaugh::
::MonkeyShocked:: ::MonkeyShocked:: ::MonkeyShocked::

Magnolia! Joran has many problems, but the size of his feet isn't one of them. Missing shoes, that's another story.
You know what they say -  it's all in how you use what you've got!!! ::MonkeyCool::

 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: hotping on March 13, 2008, 12:32:26 AM
Well I Screwed That One Up....But I'll try Again...Let Er Rip TM!  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Magnolia on March 13, 2008, 12:36:43 AM
Magnolia - I know it's possible but it would be unusual for Joran to wear size 10.5 at his height. 

Well now Klaas, I have a friend who's husband is 6'4" and he wears a
size 10.  You know what they say about foot sizes.  That could be one of
Joran's problems
 ::MonkeyLaugh::
::MonkeyShocked:: ::MonkeyShocked:: ::MonkeyShocked::

Magnolia! Joran has many problems, but the size of his feet isn't one of them. Missing shoes, that's another story.
You know what they say -  it's all in how you use what you've got!!! ::MonkeyCool::

 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::

So true!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: texasmom on March 13, 2008, 12:41:05 AM
::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: *******, *******, HE'S THE MAN!!!  STANDS WITH THE GIRL, LIKE NO ONE CAN!!!!  GET HIM BACK HERE PRONTO, PLEASE!!!! PUT THESE MONKEYS MINDS AT EASE!!!!! ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: texasmom on March 13, 2008, 12:44:47 AM
Well I Screwed That One Up....But I'll try Again...Let Er Rip TM!  ::MonkeyHaHa::

That's o.k. HP, I saw it and you still inspired me! ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 13, 2008, 12:46:19 AM
I appreciate everyone's support for ******* but let's not turn this thread into the ******* thread please.  We need to remember this is the Natalee Holloway thread.  Maybe someone should start an "******* we want you back" thread?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: hotping on March 13, 2008, 12:47:46 AM
YOU ROCK TM!  ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyWink:: ::MonkeyDance::



Come On ******* You Don't Want to See A Bunch of Grown Women Cry Do Ya!  ::MonkeyNoNo:: ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Destiny on March 13, 2008, 12:48:16 AM
I STAND WITH *******!  ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

Hotping...YOU and *******....ROCK!!!!! ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

Thank You Destiny! I Bet You "STAND WE *******" Also..Right! Then let's let Him Know...******* ******* *******!!!!!  ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

Look *******...You got a whole tribe of Monkeys dancin' for YA!!!!   ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: hotping on March 13, 2008, 12:49:48 AM
OK KLaas...I get the message..but just remember I would be doing the same if it was You... ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Destiny on March 13, 2008, 12:55:39 AM
OK KLaas...I get the message..but just remember I would be doing the same if it was You... ::MonkeyWink::

Me too Klaas...Mrs. Red...what is your opinion.....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Destiny on March 13, 2008, 01:06:23 AM
Klaas..I'm sure this is an awkward question on my part...please delete if so...but, why was the tread you opened for the ********/Anna* issue locked...

TIA....not trying to cause problems...just trying to figure them out....

******* locked both of those threads.

LAST post in thread....

View Profile
   
   
Re: Anna's complaint about ******* - please hash it out here
« Reply #7 on: March 11, 2008, 06:01:47 PM »
   
Klaas you should tell people the truth about Anna as this is ridiculous and I don't have time for it.
   Report to moderator   Logged
"I lied and thats the truth"--Joran Van Der Sloot
klaasend
Administrator
Monkey All Star
*
Online Online

Posts: 33503



View Profile
   
   
Re: Anna's complaint about ******* - please hash it out here
« Reply #8 on: March 11, 2008, 06:36:34 PM »
   
I'm going to leave this thread locked for now until I can speak to RED about this situation.

It is unacceptable for many reasons.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Destiny on March 13, 2008, 01:09:44 AM
Night Monkeys...gonna bow out on my own...before I get banned...

I Stand WithThe Girl....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 13, 2008, 01:12:10 AM
Night Monkeys...gonna bow out on my own...before I get banned...

I Stand WithThe Girl....

Nite Destiny - LOL...no you won't be banned, you've done nothing wrong!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: texasmom on March 13, 2008, 01:14:38 AM
I appreciate everyone's support for ******* but let's not turn this thread into the ******* thread please.  We need to remember this is the Natalee Holloway thread.  Maybe someone should start an "******* we want you back" thread?

Sorry Klaas, I certainly didn't mean to disrupt in any way.  It just seemed to me that there's a "big elephant" in this thread tonight, and a major contributor missing.  The majority of the contributions I'm speaking of were here in this thread and most always concerning what we're all here for; Justice for Natalee Holloway. I didn't think to separate the two. 
Please move my posts anywhere you would like, or remove them completely.   


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Dihannah1 on March 13, 2008, 01:17:27 AM
I'm not trying to be rude....but where is our *******?
I miss him and I am worried about him.
Just asking.

Me too Magnolia.

Janet

 ::MonkeyEek::  What'd I miss? 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: texasmom on March 13, 2008, 01:18:02 AM

Goodnight everyone


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: hotping on March 13, 2008, 01:26:37 AM
Good Night Destiny and TM!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Dihannah1 on March 13, 2008, 01:35:26 AM
Not sure what happened and just HATE when there is friction in here.  ******* does contribute alot of time here and other areas for Natale and I give him Kudos for that.   But not knowing the facts,   what happened to Anna?  I enjoyed and learned from her posts too.

Please tell me they are at the most, on time out, as they are both needed for Natalee, being this is the Natalee thread. They both contribute.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 13, 2008, 01:45:34 AM
Please don't take this wrong, but I'm not going to spend another evening going over this issue.

I'm going to call it a night.

GOODNIGHT ALL!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: caesu on March 13, 2008, 02:00:43 AM
(http://www.revu.nl/pix/artikel/10944_main.jpg)

http://www.revu.nl/10944.Joran_vroeg_Van_der_Eem_om_het_zwijggeld

in this weeks Revu magazine Peter Schouten, the spokesman for Peter R. and Patrick, is responding to the Poentje Castro allegations.

important points:

-Joran wanted 2000 euro from Patrick to give to Daury so Daury wouldn't talk. Patrick refused.

-Patrick didn't KNOW who dumped Natalee in the ocean. he was just voicing his OPINION. (iow speculating)

-Patrick never threatened Poentje. Poentje wanted to make money from the secret tapings. Poentje wanted to sell the secret tapes to Patrick. Patrick was asthonished by this.

-Before Patrick went to Peter R., he had an IDEA to put minicamera between room plants. This was before he went to Peter R. Only then the real plan with the Range Rover was put together.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 13, 2008, 02:04:09 AM
caesu - thanks.  Is that publication normally accurate?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: caesu on March 13, 2008, 02:17:49 AM
caesu - thanks.  Is that publication normally accurate?

no it is not. that's why i wasn't surprised that they fell for the Poentje hoax last week.
also the writer Stan de Jong is an enemy of Peter R.

but now they say Peter Schouten (spokesman / press officer of Peter R. and Patrick) goes into to details about Poentje's statements.
i think to make up for last weeks mistake. only they won't acknowledge that.

i don't think they dare to quote Peter Schouten wrong.

i only hope this get picked up by all the media who reported about Poentje last week.
but i doubt it... damage been done to Patrick is difficult to repair.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Dihannah1 on March 13, 2008, 02:22:59 AM
Please don't take this wrong, but I'm not going to spend another evening going over this issue.

I'm going to call it a night.

GOODNIGHT ALL!


Klaas,  I understand.  You've been dealing with alot lately and have your plate full.   I'm saddened by some of the friction taking place here recently.  We all just need to get along.   I support ******* for all he does, but Anna has done alot too, so I want to show my support for her as well.  She has been here for just as long and has been a huge supporter for Natalee.  We may disagree at times, but it would be boring if we all had the same opinions and would get nowhere in our discussions.  Lordy!  Can't we ALL just AGREE to DISAGREE, without accusations??????

Good night all!  Sweet Dreams!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: caesu on March 13, 2008, 02:32:15 AM
friday night Bram Mosko (lawyer for Beth in civil case) at Jensen.

http://www.rtl.nl/shows/jensen/home/gastendezeweek.xml


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: katrien on March 13, 2008, 03:31:11 AM
On The Refugeesunleashed is the following discussion. The same discussion was earlier on FOK with the same poster named Nickhs.

Quote
nickhs wrote:
"J: So I told him, but if the police come, Deepak and Satish have dropped me of at the beach there, so I will have to talk with them also. Then he said, "Yes, that is true."

What he said on the tape was a loud and clear:
Then SHE said, "Yes, that is true."

As if he was talking to a WOMAN. Now would you make that mistake telling a story to someone else, if it was really a man you were talking to?
Looks like a freudian slip of the tongue.

Also, how could HE know that was true, HE wasn't there when he first said that to Deepak/Satish? But SHE obviously was.


Nickhs claims that Joran said "then SHE said".
 
It is very well possible that Joran said: (en toen zeiden ze) spoken as: "en toen seie se"
which means: "and than THEY SAID".

Every Dutch speaking person can hear that.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: mojo on March 13, 2008, 06:31:52 AM
i went over and read there, katrien.  but i fail to see his point. what is he "taking" from that. if it was just a slip of the tongue (and i still have not seen verification, if it is indeed true) OR if there's more to it and there was a SHE there with whom joran is conversing??

do you have any thoughts on it?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Tater on March 13, 2008, 07:01:52 AM
Please don't take this wrong, but I'm not going to spend another evening going over this issue.

I'm going to call it a night.

GOODNIGHT ALL!


Klaas,  I understand.  You've been dealing with alot lately and have your plate full.   I'm saddened by some of the friction taking place here recently.  We all just need to get along.   I support ******* for all he does, but Anna has done alot too, so I want to show my support for her as well.  She has been here for just as long and has been a huge supporter for Natalee.  We may disagree at times, but it would be boring if we all had the same opinions and would get nowhere in our discussions.  Lordy!  Can't we ALL just AGREE to DISAGREE, without accusations??????

Good night all!  Sweet Dreams!

Very well said and I agree 100 percent! I'm going back to bed because it's a  safer place to be right now..Snoring instead of ranting..
 
(http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2004-10/867511/43goingtobed.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: katrien on March 13, 2008, 07:34:20 AM
i went over and read there, katrien.  but i fail to see his point. what is he "taking" from that. if it was just a slip of the tongue (and i still have not seen verification, if it is indeed true) OR if there's more to it and there was a SHE there with whom joran is conversing??

do you have any thoughts on it?

Mojo,

This discussion was already on Fok before. I went over and listen the part of the tape.
It is very well possible that Joran said on the tape "en toen seiese" which means: "and then they said".
My thoughts are that there was no she, but I was not there.
Besides that, I can not think of any woman involved.

(By the way: 80% of my job is listening to tapes from very many different people and different nationalities. I do that for more than 15 years. This does of couse not mean that I know things better or that I defenitely can tell what Joran said, but I am quite experienced in listening to tapes) ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 13, 2008, 08:00:12 AM

http://www.revu.nl/10944.Joran_vroeg_Van_der_Eem_om_het_zwijggeld

in this weeks Revu magazine Peter Schouten, the spokesman for Peter R. and Patrick, is responding to the Poentje Castro allegations.

important points:

-Joran wanted 2000 euro from Patrick to give to Daury so Daury wouldn't talk. Patrick refused.

-Patrick didn't KNOW who dumped Natalee in the ocean. he was just voicing his OPINION. (iow speculating)

-Patrick never threatened Poentje. Poentje wanted to make money from the secret tapings. Poentje wanted to sell the secret tapes to Patrick. Patrick was asthonished by this.

-Before Patrick went to Peter R., he had an IDEA to put minicamera between room plants. This was before he went to Peter R. Only then the real plan with the Range Rover was put together.


Thanks Caesu! It appears Poentje tried to twist everything Patrick said in order to sensationalize his broadcast to try to make more money off it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 13, 2008, 08:04:34 AM
i went over and read there, katrien.  but i fail to see his point. what is he "taking" from that. if it was just a slip of the tongue (and i still have not seen verification, if it is indeed true) OR if there's more to it and there was a SHE there with whom joran is conversing??

do you have any thoughts on it?

Mojo,

This discussion was already on Fok before. I went over and listen the part of the tape.
It is very well possible that Joran said on the tape "en toen seiese" which means: "and then they said".
My thoughts are that there was no she, but I was not there.
Besides that, I can not think of any woman involved.

(By the way: 80% of my job is listening to tapes from very many different people and different nationalities. I do that for more than 15 years. This does of couse not mean that I know things better or that I defenitely can tell what Joran said, but I am quite experienced in listening to tapes) ::MonkeyHaHa::


Not sure about the "she" part but the "they" could very well include Deepak. This would explain why he hasn't come forward even though Joran says he wasn't involved. I can see them sending Satish home to get on the computer while "they" did the dirty work.

Deepak must have something he can hang over Joran's head. He implicated DK in one of his statements and detracted it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 13, 2008, 08:05:48 AM
Please don't take this wrong, but I'm not going to spend another evening going over this issue.

I'm going to call it a night.

GOODNIGHT ALL!


Klaas,  I understand.  You've been dealing with alot lately and have your plate full.   I'm saddened by some of the friction taking place here recently.  We all just need to get along.   I support ******* for all he does, but Anna has done alot too, so I want to show my support for her as well.  She has been here for just as long and has been a huge supporter for Natalee.  We may disagree at times, but it would be boring if we all had the same opinions and would get nowhere in our discussions.  Lordy!  Can't we ALL just AGREE to DISAGREE, without accusations??????

Good night all!  Sweet Dreams!


 :smt023 :smt023 :smt023 :smt023 :smt023


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 13, 2008, 08:13:47 AM
I think (my opinion only) that the Kalpoes are getting a free pass here.  THEY were involved (I think) to a certain degree here and Joran's convenient confession failed to implicate anyone except himself.  I still feel like that confession was for the benefit of the Kalpoe's lawsuit so they in turn could pay Joran, his father, Aruba etc. for all the money problems they have incurred in this disaster.  AHATA orchestrated this whole lawsuit (MO) so everyone could make a few bucks. ::MonkeyNoNo::


BMK, I agree. If those two had nothing to do with it they would have never told the HI story to begin with. At the very least they are involved in kidnapping or why would Deepak said he went home that first night and got on the computer in order create an alibi? I believe that was Satish on the computer early on and Deepak later after he had helped Joran out. Satish said, "How is the girl". All of this and a lot more will be brought up in the Dr. Phil case, they are far from getting a dime out of it and have still NOT provided discovery.

AHATA may very well be behind the K2 lawsuit, it was merchants who brought up the idea of suing Dr. Phil in the first place. IMO this would be ATA/AHATA railing at the US for a little victory in the case.

AHATA has been very anti-American and has recruited Americans to do some of their dirty work.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: flyer33716 on March 13, 2008, 08:23:37 AM
if anyone is interested, pleas go to bbc.com and read story about girl given drugs, raped and murdwered in goa india. they found her body and arrested 2 low lifes but authorities at first stated it was a drowning. Her bother is screaming of a coverup. Just interesting reading


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on March 13, 2008, 08:33:10 AM
Magnolia - I know it's possible but it would be unusual for Joran to wear size 10.5 at his height. 

Well now Klaas, I have a friend who's husband is 6'4" and he wears a
size 10.  You know what they say about foot sizes.  That could be one of
Joran's problems
 ::MonkeyLaugh::


My Son is 6'2" and wears a 10.5


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: crazybabyborg on March 13, 2008, 09:21:52 AM
Nut, your son sounds like mine, and I'd love to see the "dynamic duo" take care of this!  ::MonkeyWink::

K2 are involved in some way, I don't know the degree, but I'd bet on it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: crazybabyborg on March 13, 2008, 09:30:04 AM
Whoever is behind the Dr. Phil suit, it's just the epitome of skank to pursue money for your own crime. Interestingly, Joran and family did the same thing. I assume that Joran's tape kicked that in the head.

NUT: (http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/Easter/ent.gif)     ::MonkeyWink::   PI:(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/Easter/epe.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: mojo on March 13, 2008, 10:04:05 AM
i went over and read there, katrien.  but i fail to see his point. what is he "taking" from that. if it was just a slip of the tongue (and i still have not seen verification, if it is indeed true) OR if there's more to it and there was a SHE there with whom joran is conversing??

do you have any thoughts on it?

Mojo,

This discussion was already on Fok before. I went over and listen the part of the tape.
It is very well possible that Joran said on the tape "en toen seiese" which means: "and then they said".
My thoughts are that there was no she, but I was not there.
Besides that, I can not think of any woman involved.

(By the way: 80% of my job is listening to tapes from very many different people and different nationalities. I do that for more than 15 years. This does of couse not mean that I know things better or that I defenitely can tell what Joran said, but I am quite experienced in listening to tapes) ::MonkeyHaHa::

katrien, so another red herring, it seems! there are so many red herrings from joran's apologists that it's no wonder it stinks. thanks for your professional opinion!  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: mojo on March 13, 2008, 10:08:38 AM
Whoever is behind the Dr. Phil suit, it's just the epitome of skank to pursue money for your own crime. Interestingly, Joran and family did the same thing. I assume that Joran's tape kicked that in the head.

NUT: (http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/Easter/ent.gif)     ::MonkeyWink::   PI:(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/Easter/epe.gif)

hardly, after it came out the kalpoe's lawyer was stating he was taking dr. phil down (although he's doing well enough on that score himself) and that it "cleared" his client since joran said they were dumb and didn't know anything....the real issue is whether or not the judge actually forces the kalpoes to produce the documents or accepts the defenses arguments for a dismissal. in any event the behavior of dr phil and his cohorts lacks integrity IMO.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: BTgirl on March 13, 2008, 10:15:50 AM
if anyone is interested, pleas go to bbc.com and read story about girl given drugs, raped and murdwered in goa india. they found her body and arrested 2 low lifes but authorities at first stated it was a drowning. Her bother is screaming of a coverup. Just interesting reading

Someone sent me this article yesterday showing that there has been a huge increase in British tourists visiting Aruba.

http://www.eturbonews.com/1672/record-number-visitors-2007-controversial-aru

My response was that I think they're going to Aruba because they have found spots they've traditionally visited to be unsafe.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/worldnews.html?in_article_id=523707&in_page_id=1811

Do we have any British posters who could help spread the word that Aruba has some of the same issues?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: crazybabyborg on March 13, 2008, 10:35:00 AM
hmmm. I would think that with the Madeline McCann case so public that British tourists would be cautious of traveling to spots that are known to be dangerous. I'm scratching my head over the increase in tourism from the UK.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: ldstlou on March 13, 2008, 10:59:43 AM
CBB...I am so cute!!!! Oh my gosh!!!! Thank you for the Easter outfit!!!
LOOOOOVVVVEEEE IIIIITTTTT!!!!!
 ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: ldstlou on March 13, 2008, 11:03:17 AM
Klass,
funny story!!
My brother came into the forum to read up and saw my fat mip6 and chuckie rat and said maybe you should delete them since you have invited so many people to come read. I explained the story about the two and he said, well...it still looks bad. Got a lecture from my little brother!!! lol
So since we have so many new readers who don't know the history...I am deleting my fat bast--d and chuckie rat.  ::MonkeyNoNo:: 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 13, 2008, 11:05:12 AM
Klass,
funny story!!
My brother came into the forum to read up and saw my fat mip6 and chuckie rat and said maybe you should delete them since you have invited so many people to come read. I explained the story about the two and he said, well...it still looks bad. Got a lecture from my little brother!!! lol
So since we have so many new readers who don't know the history...I am deleting my fat bast--d and chuckie rat.  ::MonkeyNoNo:: 

 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: ldstlou on March 13, 2008, 11:05:49 AM
AAAHHHHH...ok...I was GOING to delete them...but you know me!!!  ::MonkeyConfused::
Can you remove them Klaas?  ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: dennisintn on March 13, 2008, 11:07:47 AM

[/quote]

hardly, after it came out the kalpoe's lawyer was stating he was taking dr. phil down (although he's doing well enough on that score himself) and that it "cleared" his client since joran said they were dumb and didn't know anything....the real issue is whether or not the judge actually forces the kalpoes to produce the documents or accepts the defenses arguments for a dismissal. in any event the behavior of dr phil and his cohorts lacks integrity IMO.
[/quote]

how has dr. phil and his cohorts acted with less than integrity?
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: GBMW on March 13, 2008, 11:08:23 AM
Site of Patrick van de Eem:

http://patrickvandereem.nl/

Babelvista needs some help but I don't have time to adjust the translation at the moment...maybe another Dutch poster can help out...otherwise I will do it as soon as possible!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 13, 2008, 11:13:29 AM
Site of Patrick van de Eem:

http://patrickvandereem.nl/

Babelvista needs some help but I don't have time to adjust the translation at the moment...maybe another Dutch poster can help out...otherwise I will do it as soon as possible!

GBMW  - thanks for the link to his website.  Is there anything new or interresting written on it?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: ldstlou on March 13, 2008, 11:17:56 AM
AAAHHHHH...ok...I was GOING to delete them...but you know me!!!  ::MonkeyConfused::
Can you remove them Klaas?  ::MonkeyLaugh::

thanks Klaas...I feel naked...lol...but I did feel silly telling my brother.."Well they said bad things about us!!" lol
And soon as it came out of my mouth,....I knew I had to delete them!!! hahahaha


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: GBMW on March 13, 2008, 11:22:51 AM
Site of Patrick van de Eem:

http://patrickvandereem.nl/

Babelvista needs some help but I don't have time to adjust the translation at the moment...maybe another Dutch poster can help out...otherwise I will do it as soon as possible!

GBMW  - thanks for the link to his website.  Is there anything new or interresting written on it?

Yes; it clarifies some things. I will try to translate the latest article asap...but I need to do it in between work...so it might take some time. Sorry!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: ldstlou on March 13, 2008, 11:23:13 AM
I think (my opinion only) that the Kalpoes are getting a free pass here.  THEY were involved (I think) to a certain degree here and Joran's convenient confession failed to implicate anyone except himself.  I still feel like that confession was for the benefit of the Kalpoe's lawsuit so they in turn could pay Joran, his father, Aruba etc. for all the money problems they have incurred in this disaster.  AHATA orchestrated this whole lawsuit (MO) so everyone could make a few bucks. ::MonkeyNoNo::


BMK, I agree. If those two had nothing to do with it they would have never told the HI story to begin with. At the very least they are involved in kidnapping or why would Deepak said he went home that first night and got on the computer in order create an alibi? I believe that was Satish on the computer early on and Deepak later after he had helped Joran out. Satish said, "How is the girl". All of this and a lot more will be brought up in the Dr. Phil case, they are far from getting a dime out of it and have still NOT provided discovery.

AHATA may very well be behind the K2 lawsuit, it was merchants who brought up the idea of suing Dr. Phil in the first place. IMO this would be ATA/AHATA railing at the US for a little victory in the case.

AHATA has been very anti-American and has recruited Americans to do some of their dirty work.


absolutely they were involved. I agree too. But we have to take them down one at a time it appears. The truth will come out, I have to keep faith in that.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 13, 2008, 11:29:31 AM
Site of Patrick van de Eem:

http://patrickvandereem.nl/

Babelvista needs some help but I don't have time to adjust the translation at the moment...maybe another Dutch poster can help out...otherwise I will do it as soon as possible!

GBMW  - thanks for the link to his website.  Is there anything new or interresting written on it?

Yes; it clarifies some things. I will try to translate the latest article asap...but I need to do it in between work...so it might take some time. Sorry!

I'll run the most recent article through the google translator then you can correct it when you have time if that helps!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 13, 2008, 11:33:11 AM
From Patrick van der Eem's website - the most current article/post roughly translated through google:

http://patrickvandereem.nl/



Wednesday, March 12th, 2008

PATRICK AND THE PRESS
The press is sick, people. Over the last few weeks so much nonsense written, that is you do not know. It started almost on Aruba. I do what interviewtjes for the American TV program Nightline and the local press. Is all good, though I best off because my bags are lost at the airport. Anyway, I am doing a interviewtje for De Volkskrant. Very nice grey man. A Belgian with rigorous questions. I do not find a problem. He is honest, you know, he looks just right with you. This reporter had ordered a photographer, but they came too late. So which Jean Mentens sitting with his butt to the chair barns because they must interview with a minister Hirsch Ballin. That was just in Aruba with the Prime Minister. I say: Go it. I collect photographer who ends. Put to him the greetings and thank them for the nice words. Nice anyway, because the prime minister had just said Friday that he "did a good job of that man in that car" or something. Personally, I have not heard.

That Jean Mentens is gone and last minute comes photographer who incitement. I poseer. He takes pictures. Ready. I want a shower, because by that missing bags course I have two days in the same clothes. Obtains a opschrijfboekje from his pocket. I think still, will be for the photo caption. Then suddenly ie asks what I think that for me involuntarily questioning and that I would like there may be temporarily frozen. My spokesman says even that may not be completely in the Dutch criminal law. I say that I am sarcastic or 9 days go sit in my mouth can also good, but seriously that I am completely on the side of the PPS and that they need to call and I will.

That hobbyjournalist put a press release on its website and hup the next day all the newspapers reported that the PPS Patrick is involuntarily wants interrogations. Lariekoek. Hoofdofficier Hans Mos has never said that. Just everything together invented by the photographer. Nice message yet… Because where smoke is fire snap you. That Patrick has to be a wrong boy, because it wants him involuntarily for questioning. What a puta. And all those newspapers that it immediately. Have a rechtenstudentje doing nothing in the offices that a explains that the responsibility for such a disagreement?

And what was really the truth? That I am writing on Friday, February 15 Mr Mos be aware that I have asked to come and Aruba during this trip that I am ready to bring witnesses.

THE NEW AND PANORAMA REVU

I come back after this involuntary experience with the press and see on the Schiphol New Revu which lie on the cover says that I "intrusion" have committed. In the story itself that is suddenly only "a burglary in the house of my parents". Furthermore riedeltje a rare gossip, all with supposed zegslieden anonymous, which I recognize as one the biggest crackverslaafde and fantasist of the neighborhood. Let me be brief. I have never in the house of my parents compromised, and I have also never cat or my sister in the dark geknepen (the latter first researchen good for you takes over). I have done worse things past. For clarity since Saturday never to violence against animals, because I find that despicable.

Peter R. De Vries and my woorvoerder Peter Schouten I realise my criminal history so that they know exactly what I uitgespookt.

THE PRESS AND WEDERHOOR

When I wrote yesterday that John van de Heuvel of De Telegraaf all over the head saw in the difference between justice and a 'mediavonnisje' was still not in a court of law will have the right to suspect interviews and the last word. Hear process: it is the most important principle of our law. But many magazines and newspapers can be increasingly guided by sensationalism and prefer to avoid interviews because they feel that it all again less interesting.

Koen van de Nieuwe Revu Voskuil last week immediately contacted spokesman for interviews with my visa. There is a story today in the Revu and again has asked Koen Voskuil interviews. It is about this time that hassle with Poentje Castro. My spokesman has said that interviews when it is only fair if there is a point by point rebuttal to be included. So not only as "Patrick denies everything" or that I get 10 lines and 10 columns to lay out their views. And again showed Koen Voskuil a professional reporter.

That is something different than those other Koen (Scharrenberg) by Panorama. They simply write anonymous allegations about offences down, told by "zegslieden", which - who is ever check - perhaps only in his head to talk to him. No letter interviews. No phone call. And who knows my Scharrenberg spokesman notabene! You might think that only the press in a dictatorship schofterige behaves itself.

And now ga not mean that Joran received no interviews of De Vries, because that does not make sense. Joran explained in his own words a confession. Then he said before the broadcast of Sunday at Pauw & Witteman that he only known to impress me. That was his reply.

NEW REVU THIS WEEK

Below the questions that the New Revu about it - ultimately rejected by the Aruban television broadcast - nagesprek that I had Poentje Castro and the written answers that my spokesman said after consultation with me:

CONFIRMS PATRICK OF DENIES THAT HE PRESENTATOR OF THE UN DIA BIDA DEN HAS THREATENED?

Patrick Poentje Castro denies that he has threatened with death. Castro sounded in his interview with Radio 1 also quite confused. That's something on his answering machine, but is it suddenly not so bad. Then there are 15 people meegeluisterd, but it is suddenly back "half meegeluisterd". Castro is in this case already caught in a lie. In his announcement he says Patrick accidentally to have and even offers his apologies. Later he says again that he had deliberately let the camera doordraaien. Patrick awaiting the declaration to the police also quiet. "

CONFIRMS PATRICK OF DENIES THAT HE CONCLUDED OF THE FAMILY OF THE PHONE HAS THREATENED? OMSTREEKS HE HAS THE HIDDEN CAMERA-BROADCAST OF THE FAMILY OF CONCLUDED OPGEBELD? HE HAS SOMETHING IN THE WORDS OF TRANT: 'JULLIE NOW HAVE TO TURN. JULLIE BUT WERE NOT BE FUCKEN WITH MY ISLAND?

Patrick has indeed with the father of Joran van der Sloot called just before his interview with ABC was broadcast. The report of that conversation comes word for word in his book. It was not a threat.

CONFIRMS PATRICK DENIES THAT HE OR AFTER THE END OF THE INTERVIEW WITH UN DIA BIDA DEN HAS SOMETHING IN THE WORDS OF TRANT: 'YOU DO NOT KNOW WHERE THE OTHER DRUŽINSKE MEE BEZIG HIS. IKZAL ERVOOR ENSURE THAT THEIR WHOLE LIFE IS VERBITTERD. "AS IF THIS IS DOELDE HE ON THE FAMILY VAN DER CONCLUDED?

Patrick is the best angry family Van Der Sloot Aruba and the family of Natalee Holloway has affected. The confession of Joran revealed that the father of Joran had hypocrisy that his son has never unauthorized assisted, as he has before him a mobile phone to call the cell ingesmokkeld. Whether there is more to the hand has been the police but. Patrick is certainly believe that if the life of the family Van Der Sloot is just as bitter as the lives of the Holloway family after her disappearance, that this is a particular form of justice.

AFTER THE END OF UN DIA DEN BIDA PATRICK HAS OVER THE CAMERAATJES IN PLANTS AND AN INTERNET AND TELEFOONTAP. PLANTS AS WE ARE NOT IN THE RANGE ROVER HAVE FOUND, WE ARE ASKING OUR AF, THERE ARE SEVERAL AFLUISTEROPERATIES BEEN? JULLIE HAVE AN TELEFOONTAP OR INTERNETTAP PLACED?

In the clip on the miniature cameras in the plants Patrick Saturday to talk about how he is at the beginning voornam itself talks with Joran you. When he then came into contact with Peter R. De Vries made it with his colleagues the real plan with the Range Rover. The 'telefoontap' Patrick refers to the map for his interview with Joran to take after the announcement of the program was broadcast on Thursday without the name of Joran called (already told by De Vries in De Volkskrant). Patrick was also curious or Joran would email him then and this is verhaspeld "internettap" that there never has been (if you receive an email called).

IS THERE IN THE INVESTIGATION TO JORAN COOPERATION WITH POLITIEMENSEN BEEN? PATRICK PRAAT UITBETALINGEN OVER AND SAYS: 'I SUGGEST THE TWO PARTIES SAME, BUT IT'S A LARGE GROUP. BUT WHAT THE PRESS IS ALSO THE POLITIEAGENTEN. "HE ADMITS THAT HE HAS THIS PLACE? PATRICK HAS MONEY PAID TO PRESS OR POLICE?

This knullige and deliberately misleading question, which the TV reporter tried to find out how much was paid to Patrick, is misunderstood by Patrick, who thinks that he is asked to whom he has told his story. With the reply "The press gets what, but also the police officers" is nothing more said than that he as concerned information to the press and as a witness to the police. Of course, he refers here not to make payments to the press or the police. That would be absolutely ridiculous. Patrick Why would the press or the police a "payment" to do?

HE ADMITS THAT HE HAS PLACE I KNOW ABOUT THE BODY IN SEA HAS GEGOOID? HOW WAS THIS? HE WHO HAS SHARED WITH PUBLIC INFORMATION MINISTRY?

According to the translation Patrick says: "But I know who the body is thrown into the sea." That was big news immediately, while from intonation and vocabulary show that Patrick says if someone calls: "But I know that Ajax this year is champion . "Patrick says in a way that makes clear that he is only an opinion, not science, Joran, who has helped with the removal of the corpse. Already in the program by Peter R. De Vries is clear that the crime reporter Joran not believe that this is the truth.

HE ALSO HAS ANYTHING TO WORDS: 'JORAN ASKED ME TO 2000 EURO FOR THAT MAN TO ZWIJGEN' AS DE TELEGRAAF CLAIMS? PATRICK WHO HAS GIVEN TO JORAN EURO 2000?

Patrick, in its witnesses to the police all the important details from the period explained that he Joran optrok and from the non-broadcast conversations in the car (about 19 hours). It is true that Joran at a given moment in the Range Rover said that "Daury '2000 euros needed. Patrick has that money never to Joran. As part of Joran's pokerverslaving there are geadministreerde Money in his book with the full proof will be provided. These operations are not relevant to the criminal investigation into Joran van der Sloot.

PATRICK SAYS IN A FRAGMENT THAT HEART OF NETHERLANDS UITZOND THAT HE VERMOEDT THAT DAURY WITH JORAN IN GERMANY IS. KLOPT KNOW? KNOW THIS JUSTICE?

That Joran was hiding in Germany has been reported by his own lawyer. There was a rumour that this together with a friend would be Rotterdam. Patrick has no idea whether this is the man who has helped Joran with the discharging of Natalee.

MORE IS ALSO STILL THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION PROVIDED

Another quote that the news was controlled that Patrick would have said "since I him (Joran) already know so many years", while quite clear that Patrick indicating it is the 'thing' Joran as long as millions of others know. In the same clip shows immediately that he Joran only "seven months" in flesh and blood know. But that got the headers.

For his broadcast, I Poentje Castro called to the call the shots from start-to eindseconde available, so that can be determined exactly whether and how the assembly is manipulated (like De Vries Joran all tapes available to Justice claimed ). It was astonishing to hear that Castro then these bands Patrick wanted to sell and certainly not referring to a reimbursement for the cost of DVD tje and dispatch. Of course I denied that.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 13, 2008, 11:36:26 AM
Site of Patrick van de Eem:

http://patrickvandereem.nl/

Babelvista needs some help but I don't have time to adjust the translation at the moment...maybe another Dutch poster can help out...otherwise I will do it as soon as possible!

Good Morning Monkeys - 8:30 AM

Thanks GBMW.

Youngest son's Dutch American inlaws are hopping across the border today ... picking up hubby and I up and ... we are off to world famous Stanley Park for a walk around the sea wall.

I know if I ask nice ... FIL will give me a quick translation.

If the cause of justice is Patrick's genuine objective ... I contend that he should really consider his words very carefully prior to publicly writing and speaking in regards to his conversations/ relationship with Joran.  Everything he knows should be documented ... notarized and ... copies given to Aruban authorities and ... the FBI.

I fear Patrick may commit suicide with his hands in his pocket.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 13, 2008, 11:39:52 AM
 ::MonkeyShocked::

Thanks for the translation Klaas.

Have a good day.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Flipper/Donnie29 on March 13, 2008, 11:44:21 AM
Site of Patrick van de Eem:

http://patrickvandereem.nl/

Babelvista needs some help but I don't have time to adjust the translation at the moment...maybe another Dutch poster can help out...otherwise I will do it as soon as possible!

GBMW  - thanks for the link to his website.  Is there anything new or interresting written on it?

Hi all,

Im going to read it now, if there is something interesting in it, i will tell it asap!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 13, 2008, 11:44:53 AM
::MonkeyShocked::

Thanks for the translation Klaas.

Have a good day.

Janet

It's a very rough google translation so any help cleaning it up would be much appreciated  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Flipper/Donnie29 on March 13, 2008, 11:45:17 AM
Site of Patrick van de Eem:

http://patrickvandereem.nl/

Babelvista needs some help but I don't have time to adjust the translation at the moment...maybe another Dutch poster can help out...otherwise I will do it as soon as possible!

GBMW  - thanks for the link to his website.  Is there anything new or interresting written on it?

Im too slow today, i see Klaas has allready translated it lol..  ::MonkeyCool::

Hi all,

Im going to read it now, if there is something interesting in it, i will tell it asap!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: 3doglady on March 13, 2008, 11:45:18 AM
Magnolia - I know it's possible but it would be unusual for Joran to wear size 10.5 at his height. 

Well now Klaas, I have a friend who's husband is 6'4" and he wears a
size 10.  You know what they say about foot sizes.  That could be one of
Joran's problems
 ::MonkeyLaugh::


My Son is 6'2" and wears a 10.5

Hi Monkeys, I have been lurking hear forever but rarely comment.  I'm an artist.  The picture of the shoe posted is foreshortened, (shot front to back)  You need a photo with a straight shot from the side and then compare it with other items in the photo to get an accurate size for the shoe.  Good luck!  I think you guys are great.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: ldstlou on March 13, 2008, 11:45:19 AM
Site of Patrick van de Eem:

http://patrickvandereem.nl/

Babelvista needs some help but I don't have time to adjust the translation at the moment...maybe another Dutch poster can help out...otherwise I will do it as soon as possible!

GBMW  - thanks for the link to his website.  Is there anything new or interresting written on it?

Hi all,

Im going to read it now, if there is something interesting in it, i will tell it asap!!

thanks flipper, and thank you Klaas.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 13, 2008, 11:45:57 AM
Thanks Flipper


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: ldstlou on March 13, 2008, 11:46:12 AM
Magnolia - I know it's possible but it would be unusual for Joran to wear size 10.5 at his height. 

Well now Klaas, I have a friend who's husband is 6'4" and he wears a
size 10.  You know what they say about foot sizes.  That could be one of
Joran's problems
 ::MonkeyLaugh::




My Son is 6'2" and wears a 10.5

Hi Monkeys, I have been lurking hear forever but rarely comment.  I'm an artist.  The picture of the shoe posted is foreshortened, (shot front to back)  You need a photo with a straight shot from the side and then compare it with other items in the photo to get an accurate size for the shoe.  Good luck!  I think you guys are great.

welcome 3doglady!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 13, 2008, 11:48:40 AM
Magnolia - I know it's possible but it would be unusual for Joran to wear size 10.5 at his height. 

Well now Klaas, I have a friend who's husband is 6'4" and he wears a
size 10.  You know what they say about foot sizes.  That could be one of
Joran's problems
 ::MonkeyLaugh::


My Son is 6'2" and wears a 10.5

Hi Monkeys, I have been lurking hear forever but rarely comment.  I'm an artist.  The picture of the shoe posted is foreshortened, (shot front to back)  You need a photo with a straight shot from the side and then compare it with other items in the photo to get an accurate size for the shoe.  Good luck!  I think you guys are great.

Welcome 3Dog - please don't lurk!

Yes I know the "shoe shot" is far from accurate.  If I see a photo of Joran that works better I'll try it again.   ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: ldstlou on March 13, 2008, 12:01:16 PM
Hey Monkeys, Hi!!
One of our posters has had a line across the bottom of her posts that said something like...
Avoid Aruba as if your life depends on it....it Does!!

I would like to ask that poster if I could use her comment on a sign I want to make for the Houston Travel Show. I think it was Sharon but Im not sure about that. Please email me at njackson1245@neto.com and let me know if it's ok to use that, whoever had it.
Thanks much!
Wishing a great day for all our Monkeys!

I Stand With The Girl


Great idea!!!
Go Houston Monkeys!!!!
and Go Monkeys who will be in Houston!!! lol


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 13, 2008, 12:02:22 PM
if anyone is interested, pleas go to bbc.com and read story about girl given drugs, raped and murdwered in goa india. they found her body and arrested 2 low lifes but authorities at first stated it was a drowning. Her bother is screaming of a coverup. Just interesting reading

 ::MonkeyShocked::

Thanks Flyer.

Another regime fails to anticipate a mother's determination that the truth be revealed.

Janet

++++++++++


http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/devon/7294277.stm

Second man in court over Goa girl

A second man arrested over the death of British teenager Scarlett Keeling in Goa has appeared in court accused of involvement in her murder.

Placido Carvalho is being investigated over the drugging, rape and murder of Miss Keeling, but has not been charged.

He was remanded in custody for 14 days to give police more time to quiz him.

Police say they now believe Miss Keeling, 15, of Bideford, Devon, was drugged and raped before being left for dead on a beach in the Indian resort.

Mr Carvalho was detained on Wednesday after giving himself up voluntarily.

His detention came two days after another man, Samson D'Souza, 28, had been charged with raping Miss Keeling.

Police allege Mr Carvalho intentionally supplied ecstasy and possibly other drugs to Miss Keeling before she was raped.

Mr D'Souza appeared in court in Mapusa, Goa, on Monday and was remanded into custody for 14 days.

Chief inspector Kishan Kumar said on Thursday that he was now clear about the events leading up to Miss Keeling's death.

He said Mr Carvalho had given her a cocktail of drugs, including cocaine, ecstasy and LSD, when she stumbled into a beach bar late one night.

He said Mr D'Souza, a bar tender, had taken her out of the bar and had sexually assaulted and raped her repeatedly before dragging her to the edge of the sea.

Mr Kumar said Miss Keeling was drifting in and out of unconscious and was "half dead" when Mr D'Souza saw someone coming along the beach.

He dumped the body in the sea and fled, Mr Kumar said.

He said Miss Keeling had died from "homicidal drowning".

Her death was caused by a combination of the drugs, the assault and being dumped in the water, police believe.

The two arrests came after police had said initially that Miss Keeling drowned.

Miss Keeling's mother, Fiona MacKeown, has criticised the police handling of the case, which she says remains unsolved, despite the two arrests.

Further arrests

In a statement released through her lawyer, the 43-year-old said: "The arrest of two low-level persons, to my mind, is certainly not a completion of the investigations."

Her lawyer, Vikram Varma, said on Thursday that he expected further arrests in connection with the rape and murder.

He said: "I have been told the police will be arresting more people."

Miss Keeling's naked and battered body was found on a beach in Anjuna three weeks ago.

Mr Kumar denied any cover up over the cause of death, but said one of his officers had been suspended and an inquiry was under way into his actions in the case.

'Hushed up' death

Ms MacKeown is waiting for a response from India's prime minister to her claims there was a police cover-up.  

In a letter to Manmohan Singh, Ms MacKeown said: "I have no faith in the leadership of the Goa police.  

"The administration tried its best to hush up the death as a simple case of drowning."

Mr Kumar said once the police investigation had come to a conclusion about the rape and murder "we will look into other aspects".

That could include the possible neglect of the teenager, said Mr Kumar.

Ms MacKeown had left her daughter at the resort with a friend while the rest of the family travelled further afield.

Ms MacKeown, who has denied neglecting her daughter, said: "I think I was probably naive and too trusting of the people around her that claimed to be her friends, but that was probably the worst thing I have done."  

Ms MacKeown was on a six-month holiday with her boyfriend, Scarlett and six other younger children.

'Missing money'

In a separate development another British woman has accused police in Goa of covering up the death of her boyfriend.

Rosalind Sheherlis, from London, said she believed her partner Martin Neighbour was murdered in a dispute over card game winnings.

Mr Neighbour, 39, was found on 3 February on the beach at Arambol, about eight miles from Anjuna. He had been due to marry Ms Sheherlis on 8 March.

The official cause of his death was given as drowning, but Ms Sheherlis said cuts and bruises on Mr Neighbour's body, and the fact that some of his money was missing, suggests that he was attacked.

She claims local police pressured her into signing a coroner's report describing the death as "not homicide" and made numerous errors in the investigation.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Silverfox on March 13, 2008, 12:14:03 PM
I think (my opinion only) that the Kalpoes are getting a free pass here.  THEY were involved (I think) to a certain degree here and Joran's convenient confession failed to implicate anyone except himself.  I still feel like that confession was for the benefit of the Kalpoe's lawsuit so they in turn could pay Joran, his father, Aruba etc. for all the money problems they have incurred in this disaster.  AHATA orchestrated this whole lawsuit (MO) so everyone could make a few bucks. ::MonkeyNoNo::


BMK, I agree. If those two had nothing to do with it they would have never told the HI story to begin with. At the very least they are involved in kidnapping or why would Deepak said he went home that first night and got on the computer in order create an alibi? I believe that was Satish on the computer early on and Deepak later after he had helped Joran out. Satish said, "How is the girl". All of this and a lot more will be brought up in the Dr. Phil case, they are far from getting a dime out of it and have still NOT provided discovery.

AHATA may very well be behind the K2 lawsuit, it was merchants who brought up the idea of suing Dr. Phil in the first place. IMO this would be ATA/AHATA railing at the US for a little victory in the case.

AHATA has been very anti-American and has recruited Americans to do some of their dirty work.


I agree with both of you...just mention the word lawsuit and everybody wants to hide their heads in the sand...

I am ready to file suit against them... personal damages for pain and suffering due to the coverup of what happened to Nat... I have a daughter around her age and I have not slept one good night since this happened because I feel this might have happened to her since Nat disappeared...Every parent's nightmare this is and Deepaks taped confession says a lot... put it in front of an American jury of moms and pops of teenagers and see how long he is free of the gallows... hang the sob... he is a liar and so is his bro for letting Joran get away... we will expose all of you for what you are and let us convict you on American soil and see how you like the prison system here (so don't drop the soap in the shower unless you want to feel like Nat did before her life was gone).


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: GBMW on March 13, 2008, 12:27:51 PM
Site of Patrick van de Eem:

http://patrickvandereem.nl/

Babelvista needs some help but I don't have time to adjust the translation at the moment...maybe another Dutch poster can help out...otherwise I will do it as soon as possible!

GBMW  - thanks for the link to his website.  Is there anything new or interresting written on it?

Hi all,

Im going to read it now, if there is something interesting in it, i will tell it asap!!

thanks flipper, and thank you Klaas.

Almost done with the (rough) translation!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Tater on March 13, 2008, 12:32:37 PM
Magnolia - I know it's possible but it would be unusual for Joran to wear size 10.5 at his height. 

Well now Klaas, I have a friend who's husband is 6'4" and he wears a
size 10.  You know what they say about foot sizes.  That could be one of
Joran's problems
 ::MonkeyLaugh::


My Son is 6'2" and wears a 10.5

Hi Monkeys, I have been lurking hear forever but rarely comment.  I'm an artist.  The picture of the shoe posted is foreshortened, (shot front to back)  You need a photo with a straight shot from the side and then compare it with other items in the photo to get an accurate size for the shoe.  Good luck!  I think you guys are great.

(http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2004-10/867511/WelcomeBanner.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 13, 2008, 12:38:24 PM
Bottom Line ...

Joran, Deepak, Satish and Paulus knew that Natalee Holloway was deceased when the Holiday Inn fabrication was relayed to Jug, Beth and friends within 24 hours of Natalee Holloway's disappearance.

Think about it ... why create a lie that Natalee Holloway had the ability to refute if she should turn up.

Janet

++++++++++

Mickey John
On the Record w/ Greta
June 29, 2005

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,161044,00.html

JOHN: ... He (Deepak) said a story being made up about dropping the girl of at a Holiday Inn, was all something being made up. He, and the Dutch guy, and the Dutch guy's father, they sit and made up the story.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: katrien on March 13, 2008, 12:50:41 PM
Site of Patrick van de Eem:

http://patrickvandereem.nl/

Babelvista needs some help but I don't have time to adjust the translation at the moment...maybe another Dutch poster can help out...otherwise I will do it as soon as possible!

GBMW  - thanks for the link to his website.  Is there anything new or interresting written on it?

Hi all,

Im going to read it now, if there is something interesting in it, i will tell it asap!!

I read it quickly too.
Must be a shock for the Peter R, Patrick, Mrs. Holloway and Natalee bashers.
But well, if you knew already who some of the writers of the articles are, it is not so difficult to quess that what they write about Patrick with all the "so called witnesses" are lies.. :wink:
Besides that, Renee Gielen is also telling loads of lies about Mrs. Holloway and Natalee and they are operating on the same sites, so ::MonkeyHaHa::

I wonder if Moszkowicz is going to talk about these things tomorrow.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Sea Searcher on March 13, 2008, 01:09:26 PM
I think (my opinion only) that the Kalpoes are getting a free pass here.  THEY were involved (I think) to a certain degree here and Joran's convenient confession failed to implicate anyone except himself.  I still feel like that confession was for the benefit of the Kalpoe's lawsuit so they in turn could pay Joran, his father, Aruba etc. for all the money problems they have incurred in this disaster.  AHATA orchestrated this whole lawsuit (MO) so everyone could make a few bucks. ::MonkeyNoNo::

Good Afternoon Monkeys

Wouldn't these statements imply that Joran (and perhaps others) have staged this so called
confession and knew from the start that Joran was at least being taped...that would make this
more of a carefully planned statement rather than a confession to a trusted friend?

 just a thought


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Dihannah1 on March 13, 2008, 01:20:53 PM
if anyone is interested, pleas go to bbc.com and read story about girl given drugs, raped and murdwered in goa india. they found her body and arrested 2 low lifes but authorities at first stated it was a drowning. Her bother is screaming of a coverup. Just interesting reading

Someone sent me this article yesterday showing that there has been a huge increase in British tourists visiting Aruba.

http://www.eturbonews.com/1672/record-number-visitors-2007-controversial-aru

My response was that I think they're going to Aruba because they have found spots they've traditionally visited to be unsafe.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/worldnews.html?in_article_id=523707&in_page_id=1811

Do we have any British posters who could help spread the word that Aruba has some of the same issues?


Hi BT!  I'm not sure about Brit posters, but on occasion, when I look at the site meter, I see a few, I assume lurkers.  We need to call them in to join!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Dihannah1 on March 13, 2008, 01:25:05 PM
Magnolia - I know it's possible but it would be unusual for Joran to wear size 10.5 at his height. 

Well now Klaas, I have a friend who's husband is 6'4" and he wears a
size 10.  You know what they say about foot sizes.  That could be one of
Joran's problems
 ::MonkeyLaugh::


My Son is 6'2" and wears a 10.5

Hi Monkeys, I have been lurking hear forever but rarely comment.  I'm an artist.  The picture of the shoe posted is foreshortened, (shot front to back)  You need a photo with a straight shot from the side and then compare it with other items in the photo to get an accurate size for the shoe.  Good luck!  I think you guys are great.

Welcome! Please stop lurking and join the monkeys!  We now have another 'expert' in a something different!  Especially with trying to view and review all the pics posted here!  Especially bag in water.   I just love all the smart and diverse monkeys here!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: jackb on March 13, 2008, 01:37:06 PM
Magnolia - I know it's possible but it would be unusual for Joran to wear size 10.5 at his height. 

Well now Klaas, I have a friend who's husband is 6'4" and he wears a
size 10.  You know what they say about foot sizes.  That could be one of
Joran's problems
 ::MonkeyLaugh::
::MonkeyShocked:: ::MonkeyShocked:: ::MonkeyShocked::

Magnolia! Joran has many problems, but the size of his feet isn't one of them. Missing shoes, that's another story.
You know what they say -  it's all in how you use what you've got!!! ::MonkeyCool::

 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::

So true!
 

Well, maybe he wore his "feet" out walking on them.  LOL or even got STDs of the feet and they shrunk.  Maybe he really is a girl who wants to be..........well, just thought I would throw that in there.  But a 6 ft 5 in person with size 10-and-a-half foot sounds like his "ring size wouldn't be much."   Jack b.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: katrien on March 13, 2008, 01:38:15 PM
A few quotes from Patrick:

Quote
Het is menselijk, Patrick, dat iedereen dan alles wat slecht is het snelst gelooft.”
Hij citeerde Graham Greene: “That everyone everywhere believes what is bad.”


Quote
”Het is beter dat ik mijn kaken stijf op elkaar hou tot de rechtzaak”.

"It is better that I don't say anything till the lawsuit".

Does that mean? ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Dihannah1 on March 13, 2008, 01:39:02 PM
I think (my opinion only) that the Kalpoes are getting a free pass here.  THEY were involved (I think) to a certain degree here and Joran's convenient confession failed to implicate anyone except himself.  I still feel like that confession was for the benefit of the Kalpoe's lawsuit so they in turn could pay Joran, his father, Aruba etc. for all the money problems they have incurred in this disaster.  AHATA orchestrated this whole lawsuit (MO) so everyone could make a few bucks. ::MonkeyNoNo::

Good Afternoon Monkeys

Wouldn't these statements imply that Joran (and perhaps others) have staged this so called
confession and knew from the start that Joran was at least being taped...that would make this
more of a carefully planned statement rather than a confession to a trusted friend?

 just a thought

Welcome SeaSearcher!   Anything is possible anymore, so your though is not totally out of line here.  My personal opinion, mainly comes from our Ducth posters who watched and understood his language, so could understand the inflections in his voice along with his physical actions, sort of putting it in a better perspective for me watching, not understanding a word he said.   So I tend to believe he did not know he was being taped.  Also explains his apology to Daury when he found out he was caught and his idiotic call to P&W making himself look like even more of a fool.   Not to say, I believe every word he said, it's just hard know the "entire real" truth.    As mentioned before, not the best writer in the world could write a mystery book better than this! 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Dihannah1 on March 13, 2008, 01:41:25 PM
A few quotes from Patrick:

Quote
Het is menselijk, Patrick, dat iedereen dan alles wat slecht is het snelst gelooft.”
Hij citeerde Graham Greene: “That everyone everywhere believes what is bad.”


Quote
”Het is beter dat ik mijn kaken stijf op elkaar hou tot de rechtzaak”.

"It is better that I don't say anything till the lawsuit".

Does that mean? ::MonkeyCool::

 ::MonkeyWink::  Thanks Katrien!   Do you know if Patrick knows English?  Wouldn't it be awesome  if we could get him here to provide us some inside info. or just to discuss what we have learned over the years.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: GBMW on March 13, 2008, 01:41:58 PM
Site of Patrick van de Eem:

http://patrickvandereem.nl/

Babelvista needs some help but I don't have time to adjust the translation at the moment...maybe another Dutch poster can help out...otherwise I will do it as soon as possible!

GBMW  - thanks for the link to his website.  Is there anything new or interresting written on it?

Hi all,

Im going to read it now, if there is something interesting in it, i will tell it asap!!

I read it quickly too.
Must be a shock for the Peter R, Patrick, Mrs. Holloway and Natalee bashers.
But well, if you knew already who some of the writers of the articles are, it is not so difficult to quess that what they write about Patrick with all the "so called witnesses" are lies.. :wink:
Besides that, Renee Gielen is also telling loads of lies about Mrs. Holloway and Natalee and they are operating on the same sites, so ::MonkeyHaHa::

I wonder if Moszkowicz is going to talk about these things tomorrow.

NOT FINISHED YET & IT'S A ROUGH TRANSLATION, THERE MIGHT BE A FEW MISTAKES!....HAVE TO GO NOW; BUT I'LL POST THE REST ASAP

The press is sick, people. The last weeks there has been written a lot of nonsense, you don’t want to know. It started a bit on Aruba. I did a few interviews for the American tv-programme Nightline and the local press. Everything goes well although I’m a bit cranky because my luggage was lost at the airport. But anyway, I do an interview with the Volkskrant. A very  nice grey man. A Belgian with strict questions. I don’t mind. He is honest, you know, he looks you straight in the eye. That reporter had asked for a fotographer, but he was late. Therefore that Jean Mentens is impatient because he has an interview with with minister Hirsch Ballin. He was on Aruba with the prime minister. I said: You go. I’ll meet with the photographer. Tell him hi and thank him for the kind words. It was the decent thing to do because the prime minister had just said on Friday that he found “the work of the man in that car a good job” or something like that. I haven’t heard it myself.

Jean Mentens is gone & at the last minute that photographer shows up. I pose. He takes photos. Done.   I want to shower, because of the missing luggage I’ve been walking in the same clothes for two days. He gets a notebook out of his pocket. I’m thinking: this must be for the phototext. Then he asks suddenly what I think of the fact that the OM of Aruba wants to interrogate me on involuntary basis and that I can be temporary jailed. My spokesman says that this is impossible according to Dutch criminal law. I say sarcastically that I will sit for 9 days and can also keep my mouth shut but in a serious way I tell him that I’m entirely on the side of the OM and that they will only have to call & I’ll be there.

That hobbyjournalist (means a not so professional reporter / journalist) puts a press bulletin on its Internet site and the next day all newspapers are covering the fact that the OM of Aruba wants to interrogate Patrick involuntary.

Bullshit. Prosecutor Hans Mos never said this. That photographer simply invented everything. Nice thing to report right? Because where there is smoke, there must be a fire. That Patrick must be a wrong guy, because the OM wants to interrogate Patrick involuntary. What a puta, not? And all those newspapers that copy this immediately. Don’t they have some law intern to explain that the OM doesn’t have the right to do this?

And what is the truth? On Friday the 15th of February I informed mr. Mos in writing that I will come to Aruba & that I’m more than willing to testify.

THE NIEUWE REVU AND PANORAMA
I return after this involuntary experience with the press and see on Schiphol the Nieuwe  Revu lying in the stands; on the cover that I “burgled”. In the story itself this becomes only "a burgling in the house of my parents". Furthermore a lot of gossip, all by so-called anonymous people, one I recognise as a crackaddict & the fantast of the neighbourhood. Let me keep this short. I have never burgled in the house of my parents and I have also never gripped the cat or my sister in obscurity (research this very well before you copy this). I have done worse things in the past. For all clarity: there was never any violence against animals involved, because I find that despicable.

Peter R. de Vries and my spokesman Peter Schouten have seen my police record so they know exactly what I’ve been up to.

THE PRESS AND WEDERHOOR
When I wrote yesterday what John van de Heuvel of de Telegraaf overlooked in the difference between jurisdiction and `mediavonnisje’ I forgot the following: in court there is such a thing as hoor en wederhoor (hearing both sides); it is the most important principle of our right. But a lot of magazines and newspapers are more interested in sensational stories and avoid this because they sense that it becomes less interesting.

Last week Koen Voskuil of the Nieuwe Revu contacted my spokesman immediately to apply   wederhoor. There is another story in de Nieuwe Revu today and again Koen Voskuil applied the rule of hearing both sides again. This time it’s about the stuff concerning Poentje Castro. My spokesman did state that hearing both sides is only honest if every point can be discussed. So not just: "Patrick denies everything" or that I get 10 lines to explain myself and they get 10 columns to give their view. And again Koen Voskuil showed himself to be a good reporter.

That is something different compared to that other Koen (Scharrenberg) of the Panorama. He writes down anonymous accusations about offences, told by "zegslieden" / people, who – if it’s ever checked – might only talk to him in his own head. No character wederhoor. Absolutely no phone call. And that Scharrenberg even knows my spokesman! You would think that only the press in an coarse dictatorship would behaves this way.

And don’t say that Joran didn’t get a chance to give his side of the story, because that doesn’t make sense. Joran made his confession in his own words. Subsequently he stated before the airing of the show on Sunday at Pauw & Witteman that he only confessed to impress me. And that was his side of the story.

NIEUWE REVU THIS WEEK

Below the questions of the Nieuwe Revu concerning - eventually not transmitted by the Aruban Television - the ‘aftertalk’ that I had with Poentje Castro and the written answers which my spokesman gave after consultation with me:

DOES PATRICK CONFIRM OR DENY THAT HE THREATENED THE PRESENTER OF UN DIA PINE?
Patrick denies that he threatened Poentje with death. Castro sounded considerably confused in his interview with radio1. Then there something on its answering machine, but suddenly that’s not so terrible after all. Then 15 people have listened, suddenly it’s "heard it vaguely – (heard half)". Castro has been caught lying in this matter earlier on. In its announcement he says he has taped Patrick accidentally and offers even an apology for this. Later he says he kept the camera rolling on purpose. Patrick awaits the declaration quietly.

DOES PATRICK CONFIRM OR DENY THAT HE THREATENED THE VAN DER SLOOT FAMILY BY TELEPHONE? HAS HE CALLED THE VAN DER SLOOT FAMILY AROUND THE HIDDEN-CAMERA TELEVISIONSHOW? HAS HE SAID ANYTHING LIKE: “NOW IT’S YOUR TURN. YOU SHOULDN’T HAVE FUCKED WITH MY ISLAND?”
Patrick has indeed called the father of Joran; just before his interview with ABC was aired. The report of this conversation will be in the book, word for word. There was no threat.

DOES PATRICK CONFIRM OR DENY THAT HE HAS SAID SOMETHING AFTER THE INTERVIEW WITH UN DIA PINE BIDA LIKE:`YOU DON’T KNOW WHAT THE OTHER FAMILY MEMBERS ARE UP TO, I WILL MAKE SURE THEIR WHOLE LIFES WILL BE EMBITTERED. IF THIS IS SO, DOES HE MEAN THE VAN DER SLOOT FAMILY?
Patrick is quite angry at the van der Sloot family for what they have done to Aruba & the family of Natalee Holloway. From the confession of Joran it became clear that the father of Joran has been a hypocrite when he said he never helped his son in an unlawful way, because he helped him to smuggle a cell phone into the prison. It is up to the police to determine if anything more happened. Patrick does believe that it would be some way of justice if the lives of the van der Sloots would be just as embittered as the lives of the family Holloway has been after her disappearance.





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: jackb on March 13, 2008, 01:42:39 PM
I think (my opinion only) that the Kalpoes are getting a free pass here.  THEY were involved (I think) to a certain degree here and Joran's convenient confession failed to implicate anyone except himself.  I still feel like that confession was for the benefit of the Kalpoe's lawsuit so they in turn could pay Joran, his father, Aruba etc. for all the money problems they have incurred in this disaster.  AHATA orchestrated this whole lawsuit (MO) so everyone could make a few bucks. ::MonkeyNoNo::

No free pass from me  ::MonkeyWink::

Second that Klaas.They need hip-waders cause the s**t is waist deep and gettin deeper. ::MonkeyDance::

They were, in all probability there except for the final send off.   Jack b.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: dsmith on March 13, 2008, 01:47:49 PM
my son is 6'2 and size 13 shoe go figure


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: private eye on March 13, 2008, 02:09:13 PM
Magnolia - I know it's possible but it would be unusual for Joran to wear size 10.5 at his height. 

Well now Klaas, I have a friend who's husband is 6'4" and he wears a
size 10.  You know what they say about foot sizes.  That could be one of
Joran's problems
 ::MonkeyLaugh::

It's not:)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 13, 2008, 02:09:17 PM

Could it be that the November, 2007 detentions were a ruse ... an opportunity for getting stories straight in regards to the impending fifth video recording?

The planned outcome would distance:

1.  Paulus.
2.  the Kalpoes ... the Kalpoes who have the ability to implicate Paulus.
3.  those who assisted Paulus in moving Natalee from the beach ... those who have the ability to implicate Paulus.
4.  the sons of the elite (pimps).
5.  the gardener's observation and Junior's observation.
6.  those in the Aruban/Dutch administrations who were involved in or aware of the coverup.
7.  the owners of the Exelcior and Carlos 'N Charles from liability ... the establishments where an underage Joran drank and gambled on the evening of May 29, 2005 and the morning of May 30, 2005.

The planned outcome would appease Natalee's family ... provide a measure of closure ... silence a mother who demanded answers ...
 
The planned outcome would assure that a known liar would not be held legally accountable ... the video recording would be ruled inadmissible as evidence.

Janet
 
++++++++++

http://www.dutchnews.nl/news/archives/2008/02/arubans_wary_of_fifth_car_trip.php

Arubans wary of fifth car trip in Holloway case
Monday 25 February 2008

 
Dutch tv crime reporter Peter R de Vries set up a fifth car trip to try and get Joran van der Sloot to confess to murdering US teenager Natalee Holloway after the Aruban public prosecution department said the original four recordings did not contain enough evidence, the Volkskrant reported on Saturday.
 
Aruban officials told De Vries and his team at a secret hotel meeting that the tapes did not contain enough new evidence, the paper says in a reconstruction of events surrounding the tv programme which claimed to solve the mystery of her disappearance.
 
Aruban public prosecutor Hans Mos told the paper he did not want to have anything to do with the extra car trip because he was afraid it could be construed as entrapment and blow the case.
 
The final car trip with Van der Sloot and his 'friend' Patrick van der Eem took place on January 29 in a borrowed car which had been hastily kitted out with recording equipment, the paper said. The original had already been sold.
 
During that trip, Van der Sloot said he was not sure if Natalee had been dead when a friend dumped her body at sea.
 
After the press release was issued claiming the case had been solved but without giving any further details, De Vries told the paper he hoped that Van der Sloot would again phone his 'friend'.
 
But website VKMag picked up a page on De Vries' website which identified Van der Sloot. The page had been prepared for release after the programme was aired on Sunday but had gone live by mistake.



For now I am giving Peter Devries and Patrick van der Eem the benefit of the doubt that their motives in regard to video recording was all about justice for Natalee.  However ... I believe with all my heart that ... at the very least ... the "powers that be" in the investigation ... Paulus van der Sloot ... Joran and ... the Kalpoes all took advantage of the knowledge of the "fifth video recording segment".

Janet

+++++++++++


Joran Van der Sloot
Pauw & Witteman
(Phone Interview/Grandma's house)
February 4, 2008


Question:  What did you tell him:

Joran:  Yes, well everyone will see it this Sunday, ha ha ha , but I can easily proof that what I said is not true, it's a whole lot about nothing ...

Translation - Marco@RU


February 15, 2008
Court of Appeal upholds lower judge’s decision not to detain J.v.d.S.
J.v.d.S remains prime suspect
Judicial investigation continues


The Court of Appeal announced by the end of yesterday, February 14th, 2008, its decision to uphold the refusal by the investigating judge to order pre-trial detention of J.v.d.S. in the case of the disappearance of Natalee Holloway. The Office of the Public Prosecutor had requested such an order after the “Peter R de Vries-tapes” had been received by the Office and had been evaluated. Last week the Office appealed the ruling of refusal by the judge.

The reasons underlying the Court’s decision are the following. The Court has seen the visual materials, has listened to the audio materials and has inspected the verbatim reports. Based on that, the Court is of the opinion that there is a lack of sufficient facts and circumstances substantiating serious grounds for the suspicion of the suspect’s involvement in the crimes for which he is being held responsible by the prosecution. The Court will generally be a bit more hesitant when it has to decide on a new request for pre-trial detention of a suspect, when that same suspect has been detained repeatedly before and there has been a considerable lapse of time.

J.v.d.S. has given extensive and detailed statements in Patrick van der Eem’s car, the undercover citizen who worked for Peter R. de Vries, on what happened during the night of the disappearance of Natalee Holloway. Nevertheless the Court sees various reasons not to accept the serious grounds of suspicion which are statutorily required for pre-trial detention. One of them is the history of contradictory statements by J.v.d.S., which were belied repeatedly by objective findings.

At this moment those parts of the statements made in Van der Eem’s car which contain new elements are not being underpinned by objective findings. Considering the possibility of a serious personality disorder – as voiced by the prosecution – combined with a personal history of untrue statements and remarks, which even according to the suspect himself are frequently false, the Court of Appeal has reasons for doubt regarding the incriminating character of the “car-statements.”  

On the pre-trial detention issue the Code of criminal procedure does not provide for further appeals. The effect of the Court decision is that J.v.d.S. cannot be (re)arrested. The investigation of the Natalee Holloway case continues. J.v.d.S. is again the prime suspect.

At the end of the investigation the Office of the Public Prosecution will decide whether to charge or not/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: private eye on March 13, 2008, 02:12:25 PM

Could it be that the November, 2007 detentions were a ruse ... an opportunity for getting stories straight in regards to the impending fifth video recording?

The planned outcome would distance:

1.  Paulus.
2.  the Kalpoes ... the Kalpoes who have the ability to implicate Paulus.
3.  those who assisted Paulus in moving Natalee from the beach ... those who have the ability to implicate Paulus.
4.  the sons of the elite (pimps).
5.  the gardener's observation and Junior's observation.
6.  those in the Aruban/Dutch administrations who were involved in or aware of the coverup.
7.  the owners of the Exelcior and Carlos 'N Charles from liability ... the establishments where an underage Joran drank and gambled on the evening of May 29, 2005 and the morning of May 30, 2005.

The planned outcome would appease Natalee's family ... provide a measure of closure ... silence a mother who demanded answers ...
 
The planned outcome would assure that a known liar would not be held legally accountable ... the video recording would be ruled inadmissible as evidence.

Janet
 
++++++++++

http://www.dutchnews.nl/news/archives/2008/02/arubans_wary_of_fifth_car_trip.php

Arubans wary of fifth car trip in Holloway case
Monday 25 February 2008

 
Dutch tv crime reporter Peter R de Vries set up a fifth car trip to try and get Joran van der Sloot to confess to murdering US teenager Natalee Holloway after the Aruban public prosecution department said the original four recordings did not contain enough evidence, the Volkskrant reported on Saturday.
 
Aruban officials told De Vries and his team at a secret hotel meeting that the tapes did not contain enough new evidence, the paper says in a reconstruction of events surrounding the tv programme which claimed to solve the mystery of her disappearance.
 
Aruban public prosecutor Hans Mos told the paper he did not want to have anything to do with the extra car trip because he was afraid it could be construed as entrapment and blow the case.
 
The final car trip with Van der Sloot and his 'friend' Patrick van der Eem took place on January 29 in a borrowed car which had been hastily kitted out with recording equipment, the paper said. The original had already been sold.
 
During that trip, Van der Sloot said he was not sure if Natalee had been dead when a friend dumped her body at sea.
 
After the press release was issued claiming the case had been solved but without giving any further details, De Vries told the paper he hoped that Van der Sloot would again phone his 'friend'.
 
But website VKMag picked up a page on De Vries' website which identified Van der Sloot. The page had been prepared for release after the programme was aired on Sunday but had gone live by mistake.



For now I am giving Peter Devries and Patrick van der Eem the benefit of the doubt that their motives in regard to video recording was all about justice for Natalee.  However ... I believe with all my heart that ... at the very least ... the "powers that be" in the investigation ... Paulus van der Sloot ... Joran and ... the Kalpoes all took advantage of the knowledge of the "fifth video recording segment".

Janet

+++++++++++


Joran Van der Sloot
Pauw & Witteman
(Phone Interview/Grandma's house)
February 4, 2008


Question:  What did you tell him:

Joran:  Yes, well everyone will see it this Sunday, ha ha ha , but I can easily proof that what I said is not true, it's a whole lot about nothing ...

Translation - Marco@RU


February 15, 2008
Court of Appeal upholds lower judge’s decision not to detain J.v.d.S.
J.v.d.S remains prime suspect
Judicial investigation continues


The Court of Appeal announced by the end of yesterday, February 14th, 2008, its decision to uphold the refusal by the investigating judge to order pre-trial detention of J.v.d.S. in the case of the disappearance of Natalee Holloway. The Office of the Public Prosecutor had requested such an order after the “Peter R de Vries-tapes” had been received by the Office and had been evaluated. Last week the Office appealed the ruling of refusal by the judge.

The reasons underlying the Court’s decision are the following. The Court has seen the visual materials, has listened to the audio materials and has inspected the verbatim reports. Based on that, the Court is of the opinion that there is a lack of sufficient facts and circumstances substantiating serious grounds for the suspicion of the suspect’s involvement in the crimes for which he is being held responsible by the prosecution. The Court will generally be a bit more hesitant when it has to decide on a new request for pre-trial detention of a suspect, when that same suspect has been detained repeatedly before and there has been a considerable lapse of time.

J.v.d.S. has given extensive and detailed statements in Patrick van der Eem’s car, the undercover citizen who worked for Peter R. de Vries, on what happened during the night of the disappearance of Natalee Holloway. Nevertheless the Court sees various reasons not to accept the serious grounds of suspicion which are statutorily required for pre-trial detention. One of them is the history of contradictory statements by J.v.d.S., which were belied repeatedly by objective findings.

At this moment those parts of the statements made in Van der Eem’s car which contain new elements are not being underpinned by objective findings. Considering the possibility of a serious personality disorder – as voiced by the prosecution – combined with a personal history of untrue statements and remarks, which even according to the suspect himself are frequently false, the Court of Appeal has reasons for doubt regarding the incriminating character of the “car-statements.”  

On the pre-trial detention issue the Code of criminal procedure does not provide for further appeals. The effect of the Court decision is that J.v.d.S. cannot be (re)arrested. The investigation of the Natalee Holloway case continues. J.v.d.S. is again the prime suspect.

At the end of the investigation the Office of the Public Prosecution will decide whether to charge or not/

Can I ask you a semi personal question? What jobs have you worked in your past?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: katrien on March 13, 2008, 02:12:56 PM
A few quotes from Patrick:

Quote
Het is menselijk, Patrick, dat iedereen dan alles wat slecht is het snelst gelooft.”
Hij citeerde Graham Greene: “That everyone everywhere believes what is bad.”


Quote
”Het is beter dat ik mijn kaken stijf op elkaar hou tot de rechtzaak”.

"It is better that I don't say anything till the lawsuit".

Does that mean? ::MonkeyCool::

 ::MonkeyWink::  Thanks Katrien!   Do you know if Patrick knows English?  Wouldn't it be awesome  if we could get him here to provide us some inside info. or just to discuss what we have learned over the years.

I don't know. But the article tells:

Quote
Mondain, Marga 10Th, 2008
Uw Webspecialist brengt logste van Patrick van der Heem online
Patrick van der Heem heeft zijn eigen website geopend op deze domeinnaam. Hij heeft gekozen voor de dienstverlening van Uw Webspecialist, een bedrijf in Almelo, dat websites en webapplicaties ontwikkelt voor de zakelijk en particuliere markt.
Patrick zal op zijn website gaan belogen en reageren op nieuwsberichten in de media als dat nodig is.

The last sentence tells that Patrick will blog and react on the news in the media if necessary.

By the way: You might think I am a Patrick-friend: I do not know Patrick but I have seen all the interviews in the last few months and I knew it were all lies, because, as I told before, I have seen what one of journalists, writing about Patrick, did to a total innocent man. I could not believe journalists could be so cruel.

Patrick tells in the interview he would never harm animals.
In one of the TV interviews Patrick told that even among criminals it is "not done" to kill and rape an 18 year old girl.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: private eye on March 13, 2008, 02:20:18 PM
Tomikosmom? Janet,

You have an amazing command of all of the information of the case, and I am trying to figure out how you do do it? I realize that you can search SM and pull up the appropriate info and cut and paste, but you seem to do it a lot quicker than the SM site works, and you always select the most relevant articles to post, so quickly.

I always feel sorry for who I guess is your husband when you say you are getting ready to play him in a board game or cards. I always think he must be a glutton for punishment:) If he wines then either he is a genuis too, or you are smart enough to make him feel like one:)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on March 13, 2008, 02:21:47 PM
Magnolia - I know it's possible but it would be unusual for Joran to wear size 10.5 at his height. 

Well now Klaas, I have a friend who's husband is 6'4" and he wears a
size 10.  You know what they say about foot sizes.  That could be one of
Joran's problems
 ::MonkeyLaugh::

It's not:)


Posted a link for Direct mail in Aruba Private eye.Own businesses and use direct mail.Very effective.Little expensive but not to bad...Few pages back.Don't know if you saw it???


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 13, 2008, 02:25:06 PM
Private Eye

I worked for the Provincial Telecommunication Company ... right out of high school (17 years old) and ... took a retirement package 40 years later.  I took a 10 year break in between to be at home with my two eldest.  I held several positions within the company over the years but ... my final position was this wannabe detective's dream job.  Using a locator system ... I traced missing/stolen equipment of VERY high value.

Sometimes I wish I had not been so anxious to take that retirement package ... I really miss my job and ... the people.

Thank you for asking.

Have a good day Monkeys ... I am off.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 13, 2008, 02:26:44 PM
Tomikosmom? Janet,

You have an amazing command of all of the information of the case, and I am trying to figure out how you do do it? I realize that you can search SM and pull up the appropriate info and cut and paste, but you seem to do it a lot quicker than the SM site works, and you always select the most relevant articles to post, so quickly.

I always feel sorry for who I guess is your husband when you say you are getting ready to play him in a board game or cards. I always think he must be a glutton for punishment:) If he wines then either he is a genuis too, or you are smart enough to make him feel like one:)

She is absolutely amazing!  My guess is she is so organized she has folders labeled with important information and knows right where to go for everything! 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Flipper/Donnie29 on March 13, 2008, 02:27:25 PM
A few quotes from Patrick:

Quote
Het is menselijk, Patrick, dat iedereen dan alles wat slecht is het snelst gelooft.”
Hij citeerde Graham Greene: “That everyone everywhere believes what is bad.”


Quote
”Het is beter dat ik mijn kaken stijf op elkaar hou tot de rechtzaak”.

"It is better that I don't say anything till the lawsuit".

Does that mean? ::MonkeyCool::

 ::MonkeyWink::  Thanks Katrien!   Do you know if Patrick knows English?  Wouldn't it be awesome  if we could get him here to provide us some inside info. or just to discuss what we have learned over the years.

I don't know. But the article tells:

Quote
Mondain, Marga 10Th, 2008
Uw Webspecialist brengt logste van Patrick van der Heem online
Patrick van der Heem heeft zijn eigen website geopend op deze domeinnaam. Hij heeft gekozen voor de dienstverlening van Uw Webspecialist, een bedrijf in Almelo, dat websites en webapplicaties ontwikkelt voor de zakelijk en particuliere markt.
Patrick zal op zijn website gaan belogen en reageren op nieuwsberichten in de media als dat nodig is.

The last sentence tells that Patrick will blog and react on the news in the media if necessary.

By the way: You might think I am a Patrick-friend: I do not know Patrick but I have seen all the interviews in the last few months and I knew it were all lies, because, as I told before, I have seen what one of journalists, writing about Patrick, did to a total innocent man. I could not believe journalists could be so cruel.

Patrick tells in the interview he would never harm animals.
In one of the TV interviews Patrick told that even among criminals it is "not done" to kill and rape an 18 year old girl.




Yeah he seems genuine and caring as far as one can see and judge through a tv but that just my opinion.. i also saw all his interviews etc.. What he says about that its not done to kill and rape among criminals is really a sort of law amongst criminals, rape young women.. children etc, all the convicts stay in seperate parts of a jail, cause when you mix them, the chances that there being killed or molested is very high.. A sort of "moral" code..

And the media just picks out every story available, and Patrick is big now so alot of people are trying to bring him down.. Well in the panorama and nieuwe revu etc.. sickening journalism imo..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: katrien on March 13, 2008, 02:34:43 PM
Patrick asked in one of the interview "higher power" and Joran answered "higher powers".

I do not have the impression Joran meant the Kalpoe brothers with "higher powers".


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 13, 2008, 02:36:52 PM
Tomikosmom? Janet,

You have an amazing command of all of the information of the case, and I am trying to figure out how you do do it? I realize that you can search SM and pull up the appropriate info and cut and paste, but you seem to do it a lot quicker than the SM site works, and you always select the most relevant articles to post, so quickly.

I always feel sorry for who I guess is your husband when you say you are getting ready to play him in a board game or cards. I always think he must be a glutton for punishment:) If he wines then either he is a genuis too, or you are smart enough to make him feel like one:)

1.  I save every post I submit to the SM forum and file in my desktop folds according to topic.  My darling DIL (youngest son's wife) has cleaned up my files three times in the past two years.  My files are badly in need of another clean up.  She promised me that she would do it as a Christmas present ... never happened.  Maybe she meant next Christmas.

2.  My hubby.  PI ... we both love board/card games and ... so does our grown kids ... grandkids and ... some friends.  A board game is hubby's way of inticing me away from this computer.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 13, 2008, 02:45:27 PM
Patrick asked in one of the interview "higher power" and Joran answered "higher powers".

I do not have the impression Joran meant the Kalpoe brothers with "higher powers".

Nope, I wouldn't think the Kalpoes and "higher powers" equate  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: private eye on March 13, 2008, 02:46:28 PM
Tomikosmom? Janet,

You have an amazing command of all of the information of the case, and I am trying to figure out how you do do it? I realize that you can search SM and pull up the appropriate info and cut and paste, but you seem to do it a lot quicker than the SM site works, and you always select the most relevant articles to post, so quickly.

I always feel sorry for who I guess is your husband when you say you are getting ready to play him in a board game or cards. I always think he must be a glutton for punishment:) If he wines then either he is a genuis too, or you are smart enough to make him feel like one:)

1.  I save every post I submit to the SM forum and file in my desktop folds according to topic.  My darling DIL (youngest son's wife) has cleaned up my files three times in the past two years.  My files are badly in need of another clean up.  She promised me that she would do it as a Christmas present ... never happened.  Maybe she meant next Christmas.

2.  My hubby.  PI ... we both love board/card games and ... so does our grown kids ... grandkids and ... some friends.  A board game is hubby's way of inticing me away from this computer.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet

I remember not what I was going to disagree with you about, good naturedly, but I vividly remembert the scope and depth of your response, and pardon my French, but I thought to myself, WTF have I gotten myself into????????????????? You have great organizational skills and a good heart:)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Flipper/Donnie29 on March 13, 2008, 02:49:17 PM
Patrick asked in one of the interview "higher power" and Joran answered "higher powers".

I do not have the impression Joran meant the Kalpoe brothers with "higher powers".

Nope, I wouldn't think the Kalpoes and "higher powers" equate  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Indeed! For me high powers mean just what it says, people with more power then the average John Doe.. like someone at Justice, or someone with a big influence in Aruba etc..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 13, 2008, 02:55:31 PM
Posted by Kyle at BFN when someone posted about Psychics:

I hope you don't find this deflating.  Many of you probably won't want to hear this, but it's what we've observed in the field. 
The Aruban police had on file a 9" thick stack of psychic "revelations" ranging from the absolutely absurd to the plausible, to the down right convincing.  These statements came from literally hundreds of opportunist psychics from around the world coming out of woodwork.  The only thing all each of these statements had in common is that they all had remarkable inconsistencies in them which made them provably bogus based on case information not made public.  In short, I believe some people are truly gifted with fantastic imaginations and passions but we as humans are not made to know the future. If a psychic nailed every detail of this case retrospectively, they should be arrested for their involvement. The statements which were very convincing could be replicated based on a solid handle on the publicly available case information with gaps imaginatively filled in.  The problem in putting too much faith in these people is that it inevitably leads to wasting a lot of time and resources and will frustrate the team tremendously.  While in the field, we received literally hundreds of leads from psychics who knew with "absolute certainty" where Natalee's body was.  The danger in a case like this is losing hope.  When we lose hope, we cling on to anything we've got.  This makes us very susceptible to being deceived.  We want to believe someone has the answers and is capable of handing those answers over to us on a silver platter.  The problem is this just isn't reality.  It never will be.  It's a cruel realization but the sooner it's accepted the faster one can sort through the deception to find the answers based on evidence which will hold up in court.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Dihannah1 on March 13, 2008, 02:58:43 PM
A few quotes from Patrick:

Quote
Het is menselijk, Patrick, dat iedereen dan alles wat slecht is het snelst gelooft.”
Hij citeerde Graham Greene: “That everyone everywhere believes what is bad.”


Quote
”Het is beter dat ik mijn kaken stijf op elkaar hou tot de rechtzaak”.

"It is better that I don't say anything till the lawsuit".

Does that mean? ::MonkeyCool::

 ::MonkeyWink::  Thanks Katrien!   Do you know if Patrick knows English?  Wouldn't it be awesome  if we could get him here to provide us some inside info. or just to discuss what we have learned over the years.

I don't know. But the article tells:

Quote
Mondain, Marga 10Th, 2008
Uw Webspecialist brengt logste van Patrick van der Heem online
Patrick van der Heem heeft zijn eigen website geopend op deze domeinnaam. Hij heeft gekozen voor de dienstverlening van Uw Webspecialist, een bedrijf in Almelo, dat websites en webapplicaties ontwikkelt voor de zakelijk en particuliere markt.
Patrick zal op zijn website gaan belogen en reageren op nieuwsberichten in de media als dat nodig is.

The last sentence tells that Patrick will blog and react on the news in the media if necessary.

By the way: You might think I am a Patrick-friend: I do not know Patrick but I have seen all the interviews in the last few months and I knew it were all lies, because, as I told before, I have seen what one of journalists, writing about Patrick, did to a total innocent man. I could not believe journalists could be so cruel.

Patrick tells in the interview he would never harm animals.
In one of the TV interviews Patrick told that even among criminals it is "not done" to kill and rape an 18 year old girl.




Oh, I never suspected you knew him personally.   ::MonkeyWink:: I was just wondering if he spoke/wrote English as well as all the Dutch posters do so well here.  If he does, I would just love to somebody make contact with him somehow and get him over here.    I do so much appreciate what you all bring here and helping with translations and what's going on in the media!  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: private eye on March 13, 2008, 03:21:21 PM
Patrick asked in one of the interview "higher power" and Joran answered "higher powers".

I do not have the impression Joran meant the Kalpoe brothers with "higher powers".

Nope, I wouldn't think the Kalpoes and "higher powers" equate  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Indeed! For me high powers mean just what it says, people with more power then the average John Doe.. like someone at Justice, or someone with a big influence in Aruba etc..

I think the coverup is simply the key dutch who were close friends of PVDS, mostly dutch, coupled with their trump card of black mailing Rudy. I am not even sure the judges are apart of it other than knowing full well how this is being played, maybe not proof per se, but knowledge of the relationships. If someone is truly a close friend, one will do a lot to protect a man and his son. I think there are only a few directly involved, but many who are aware generally of the coverup JMO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: GBMW on March 13, 2008, 03:36:32 PM
A few quotes from Patrick:

Quote
Het is menselijk, Patrick, dat iedereen dan alles wat slecht is het snelst gelooft.”
Hij citeerde Graham Greene: “That everyone everywhere believes what is bad.”


Quote
”Het is beter dat ik mijn kaken stijf op elkaar hou tot de rechtzaak”.

"It is better that I don't say anything till the lawsuit".

Does that mean? ::MonkeyCool::

 ::MonkeyWink::  Thanks Katrien!   Do you know if Patrick knows English?  Wouldn't it be awesome  if we could get him here to provide us some inside info. or just to discuss what we have learned over the years.

I don't know. But the article tells:

Quote
Mondain, Marga 10Th, 2008
Uw Webspecialist brengt logste van Patrick van der Heem online
Patrick van der Heem heeft zijn eigen website geopend op deze domeinnaam. Hij heeft gekozen voor de dienstverlening van Uw Webspecialist, een bedrijf in Almelo, dat websites en webapplicaties ontwikkelt voor de zakelijk en particuliere markt.
Patrick zal op zijn website gaan belogen en reageren op nieuwsberichten in de media als dat nodig is.

The last sentence tells that Patrick will blog and react on the news in the media if necessary.

By the way: You might think I am a Patrick-friend: I do not know Patrick but I have seen all the interviews in the last few months and I knew it were all lies, because, as I told before, I have seen what one of journalists, writing about Patrick, did to a total innocent man. I could not believe journalists could be so cruel.

Patrick tells in the interview he would never harm animals.
In one of the TV interviews Patrick told that even among criminals it is "not done" to kill and rape an 18 year old girl.




Oh, I never suspected you knew him personally.   ::MonkeyWink:: I was just wondering if he spoke/wrote English as well as all the Dutch posters do so well here.  If he does, I would just love to somebody make contact with him somehow and get him over here.    I do so much appreciate what you all bring here and helping with translations and what's going on in the media!  ::MonkeyCool::

Hereby the complete rough translation of his latest blog:

The press is sick, people. The last weeks there has been written a lot of nonsense, you don’t want to know. It started a bit on Aruba. I did a few interviews for the American tv-programme Nightline and the local press. Everything goes well although I’m a bit cranky because my luggage was lost at the airport. But anyway, I do an interview with the Volkskrant. A very  nice grey man. A Belgian with strict questions. I don’t mind. He is honest, you know, he looks you straight in the eye. That reporter had asked for a fotographer, but he was late. Therefore that Jean Mentens is impatient because he has an interview with with minister Hirsch Ballin. He was on Aruba with the prime minister. I said: You go. I’ll meet with the photographer. Tell him hi and thank him for the kind words. It was the decent thing to do because the prime minister had just said on Friday that he found “the work of the man in that car a good job” or something like that. I haven’t heard it myself.

Jean Mentens is gone & at the last minute that photographer shows up. I pose. He takes photos. Done.   I want to shower, because of the missing luggage I’ve been walking in the same clothes for two days. He gets a notebook out of his pocket. I’m thinking: this must be for the phototext. Then he asks suddenly what I think of the fact that the OM of Aruba wants to interrogate me on involuntary basis and that I can be temporary jailed. My spokesman says that this is impossible according to Dutch criminal law. I say sarcastically that I will sit for 9 days and can also keep my mouth shut but in a serious way I tell him that I’m entirely on the side of the OM and that they will only have to call & I’ll be there.

That hobbyjournalist (means a not so professional reporter / journalist) puts a press bulletin on its Internet site and the next day all newspapers are covering the fact that the OM of Aruba wants to interrogate Patrick involuntary.

Bullshit. Prosecutor Hans Mos never said this. That photographer simply invented everything. Nice thing to report right? Because where there is smoke, there must be a fire. That Patrick must be a wrong guy, because the OM wants to interrogate Patrick involuntary. What a puta, not? And all those newspapers that copy this immediately. Don’t they have some law intern to explain that the OM doesn’t have the right to do this?

And what is the truth? On Friday the 15th of February I informed mr. Mos in writing that I will come to Aruba & that I’m more than willing to testify.

THE NIEUWE REVU AND PANORAMA
I return after this involuntary experience with the press and see on Schiphol the Nieuwe  Revu lying in the stands; on the cover that I “burgled”. In the story itself this becomes only "a burgling in the house of my parents". Furthermore a lot of gossip, all by so-called anonymous people, one I recognise as a crack addict & the fantast of the neighbourhood. Let me keep this short. I have never burgled in the house of my parents and I have also never gripped the cat or my sister in obscurity (research this very well before you copy this). I have done worse things in the past. For all clarity: there was never any violence against animals involved, because I find that despicable.

Peter R. de Vries and my spokesman Peter Schouten have seen my police record so they know exactly what I’ve been up to.

THE PRESS AND HEARING BOTH SIDES
When I wrote yesterday what John van de Heuvel of de Telegraaf overlooked in the difference between jurisdiction and `mediavonnisje’ I forgot the following: in court there is such a thing as hoor en wederhoor (hearing both sides); it is the most important principle of our right. But a lot of magazines and newspapers are more interested in sensational stories and avoid this because they sense that it becomes less interesting.

Last week Koen Voskuil of the Nieuwe Revu contacted my spokesman immediately to apply   wederhoor. There is another story in de Nieuwe Revu today and again Koen Voskuil applied the rule of hearing both sides again. This time it’s about the stuff concerning Poentje Castro. My spokesman did state that hearing both sides is only honest if every point can be discussed. So not just: "Patrick denies everything" or that I get 10 lines to explain myself and they get 10 columns to give their view. And again Koen Voskuil showed himself to be a good reporter.

That is something different compared to that other Koen (Scharrenberg) of the Panorama. He writes down anonymous accusations about offences, told by "zegslieden" / people, who – if it’s ever checked – might only talk to him in his own head. No character wederhoor. Absolutely no phone call. And that Scharrenberg even knows my spokesman! You would think that only the press in an coarse dictatorship would behaves this way.

And don’t say that Joran didn’t get a chance to give his side of the story, because that doesn’t make sense. Joran made his confession in his own words. Subsequently he stated before the airing of the show on Sunday at Pauw & Witteman that he only confessed to impress me. And that was his side of the story.

NIEUWE REVU THIS WEEK

Below the questions of the Nieuwe Revu concerning - eventually not transmitted by the Aruban Television - the ‘aftertalk’ that I had with Poentje Castro and the written answers which my spokesman gave after consultation with me:

DOES PATRICK CONFIRM OR DENY THAT HE THREATENED THE PRESENTER OF UN DIA PINE?
Patrick denies that he threatened Poentje with death. Castro sounded considerably confused in his interview with radio1. Then there something on its answering machine, but suddenly that’s not so terrible after all. Then 15 people have listened, suddenly it’s "heard it vaguely – (heard half)". Castro has been caught lying in this matter earlier on. In its announcement he says he has taped Patrick accidentally and offers even an apology for this. Later he says he kept the camera rolling on purpose. Patrick awaits the declaration quietly.

DOES PATRICK CONFIRM OR DENY THAT HE THREATENED THE VAN DER SLOOT FAMILY BY TELEPHONE? HAS HE CALLED THE VAN DER SLOOT FAMILY AROUND THE HIDDEN-CAMERA TELEVISIONSHOW? HAS HE SAID ANYTHING LIKE: “NOW IT’S YOUR TURN. YOU SHOULDN’T HAVE FUCKED WITH MY ISLAND?”
Patrick has indeed called the father of Joran; just before his interview with ABC was aired. The report of this conversation will be in the book, word for word (every word). There was no threat.

DOES PATRICK CONFIRM OR DENY THAT HE HAS SAID SOMETHING AFTER THE INTERVIEW WITH UN DIA PINE BIDA LIKE:`YOU DON’T KNOW WHAT THE OTHER FAMILY MEMBERS ARE UP TO, I WILL MAKE SURE THEIR WHOLE LIFES WILL BE EMBITTERED. IF THIS IS SO, DOES HE MEAN THE VAN DER SLOOT FAMILY?
Patrick is quite angry at the van der Sloot family for what they have done to Aruba & the family of Natalee Holloway. From the confession of Joran it became clear that the father of Joran has been a hypocrite when he said he never helped his son in an unlawful way, because he helped him to smuggle a cell phone into the prison. It is up to the police to determine if anything more happened. Patrick does believe that it would be some way of justice if the lives of the van der Sloots would be just as embittered as the lives of the family Holloway has been after her disappearance.

AFTER UN DIA PINE BIDA PATRICK HAS TALKED ABOUT CAMERA’S IN PLANTS AND A INTERNET – PHONETAP. SINCE WE HAVEN’T OBSERVED ANY PLANTS IN THE RANGE ROVER, WE WONDER, HAVE THERE BEEN MORE EAVESDROPPING OPERATIONS? HAVE YOU PLACED A PHONETAP OR INTERNETTAP?
In the fragment concerning the minicameras in the plants Patrick was talking about how he was planning to record his conversations with Joran. When he got in contact with Peter R. de Vries; Peter & his team came up with the idea of the Range Rover.  With the ‘phone tap’ Patrick refers to the plan to record the conversation with Joran after the announcement for the Peter R. de Vriesshow; which was on Thursday without mentioning Joran. (this was already told by de Vries in De Volkskrant). Patrick was also curious if Joran would e-mail him something and this remark was changed to ‘an Internet tap’ that has never been there (you can receive an e-mail without it).

HAS THERE BEEN A CORPORATION WITH THE POLICE WHEN IT COMES TO THE OPERATION? PATRICK TALKS ABOUT PAYMENTS EN SAYS: “I GIVE THE SAME TO BOTH PARTIES, BUT IT IS A LARGE GROUP. THE PRESS GETS SOMETHING BUT ALSO THE POLICE CONCERNED. DOES HE RECOGNISE THAT HE HAS SAID THIS? HAS PATRICK PAID MONEY TO PRESS OR THE POLICE?
These consciously misleading presentation of questions, with which tv-reporter tried to invent how much money has been paid to Patrick, are misinterpreted by Patrick, which makes him think he is being asked to whom he has already told his story. With the answer "the press gets something but also the police concerned" says nothing more than that he gave the press information and as a witness to the police. Of course he isn’t referring to giving payments to the press or police. That would be simply ridiculous. Why would Patrick give the press or the police a "disbursement"?

DOES PATRICK RECOGNISES THAT HE HAS SAID: I KNOW WHO THREW THE BODY IN THE SEA? HOW WAS THAT MEANT? HAS HE SHARED THAT INFORMATION WITH THE OM?
According to the translation Patrick says: "but I know who has thrown the body in sea." This became immediately big news, whereas with Patricks intonation and use of words it appears that Patrick said this as someone who says "but I know that Ajax will be the champion this year." Patrick says it in a manner which makes it clear that he is only giving an opinion, not as a matter of fact / certainty, whom has helped Joran getting rid of the body. Even if in the programme of Peter R. de Vries it is clear that Peter doesn’t believe that Joran spoke the truth concerning this.
 
DID HE SAY SOMETHING LIKE: JORAN ASKED ME FOR 2000 FOR THAT MAN TO BE SILENT LIKE DE TELEGRAAF CLAIMS? DID PATRICK GAVE THOSE 2000 EUROS TO JORAN?
Patrick has commented on all the important details in his statement to the police; concerning the time he spent with Joran and about the conversations in the car that hasn’t aired (about 19 hours).
It is correct that Joran stated in the Range Rover that ‘Daury’ needed 2000 Euro. Patrick never gave that money to Joran though. Concerning Jorans’ poker addiction there have been administered money transfers who will be supplied in Patricks book (with the full evidence). These transactions are of no importance to the criminal case against Joran van der Sloot.

PATRICK SAYS IN AN ITEM OF ‘HART VAN NEDERLAND’ THAT HE SUSPECTS THAT DAURY IS IN GERMANY WITH JORAN. IS THIS CORRECT? DOES THE POLICE KNOW THIS?
That Joran is hiding in Germany has been mentioned by Jorans own lawyer. There was a rumour that this was with a friend from Rotterdam. Patrick has no idea whether this is the friend that helped Joran with dumping the body of Natalee.

FURTHERMORE THE NEXT INFORMATION HAS ALSO BEEN SUPPLIED
Another famous quote that Patrick appears to have said "since I’ve known him (Joran) for so many years", while it is very clear that Patrick indicates that he knows ‘the case’ Joran just as long as millions of other people. In the same clip it appears almost immediately that he has known Joran just for seven months but that didn’t make the headlines.

Before the airing of his show I have rung Poentje Castro with the request for the tapes; from the beginning to the end so it can be determined if there has been some kind of manipulation concerning the montage (just like Peter R. de Vries gave all the Joran tapes to the police). Surprisingly I heard that Castro wanted to sell these tapes and he didn’t mean a compensation for the costs of a dvd & sending it. Of course I refused.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: private eye on March 13, 2008, 03:38:07 PM
Posted by Kyle at BFN when someone posted about Psychics:

I hope you don't find this deflating.  Many of you probably won't want to hear this, but it's what we've observed in the field. 
The Aruban police had on file a 9" thick stack of psychic "revelations" ranging from the absolutely absurd to the plausible, to the down right convincing.  These statements came from literally hundreds of opportunist psychics from around the world coming out of woodwork.  The only thing all each of these statements had in common is that they all had remarkable inconsistencies in them which made them provably bogus based on case information not made public.  In short, I believe some people are truly gifted with fantastic imaginations and passions but we as humans are not made to know the future. If a psychic nailed every detail of this case retrospectively, they should be arrested for their involvement. The statements which were very convincing could be replicated based on a solid handle on the publicly available case information with gaps imaginatively filled in.  The problem in putting too much faith in these people is that it inevitably leads to wasting a lot of time and resources and will frustrate the team tremendously.  While in the field, we received literally hundreds of leads from psychics who knew with "absolute certainty" where Natalee's body was.  The danger in a case like this is losing hope.  When we lose hope, we cling on to anything we've got.  This makes us very susceptible to being deceived.  We want to believe someone has the answers and is capable of handing those answers over to us on a silver platter.  The problem is this just isn't reality.  It never will be.  It's a cruel realization but the sooner it's accepted the faster one can sort through the deception to find the answers based on evidence which will hold up in court.

Unfortunately, those trusted with the evidence of the investigation were not good stewards of the evidence. Evidence has been destroyed, search activities delayed with no site protection accomplished by the authorities, and interrogations have been stopped at key points and the person being interrogated allowed to be counseled by parents and attorneys, and interrogations have been stopped just short of key questions being asked when the flow of good information was beginning to come out.

Prisoners being isolated have been furnished cell phones and communication has been allowed to occur between locked up and the free.

Do I think psychics are the answer? No.

But sharing information with people who work for people who are directly orchestrating the cover up, Rudy, or the Dutch, is the most irresponsible investigating I can imagine. What kills this investigation is people having to come into it, wanting to apply basic investigatory protocols into place, and then having those channels sabotage the new evidence that the new players discover. Of course, as is happened everytime in this case, the new people eventually come to a point where the manipulation of the evidence is undeniable, but by then the fruits of their work are gone, and there is simply another member of the believers of the cover up group. What I pray that Kyle and the crew of the Persistence will determine, is that  regardless of how hard working the man that they are working with appears to work, his work belongs to Rudy, and Rudy belongs to the local dutch.

We are not hysterical, ignorant, paranoid people. We have seen the cover up in action, in broad daylight, with impunity, and if you disregard our warnings, you will become the next chump in a series of chumps, no matter how sophisticated your equipment, the level of your educational achievement, or the extent of your job skills and work history.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: katrien on March 13, 2008, 03:42:18 PM
Thanks for the translation GMBW.  :)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: katrien on March 13, 2008, 03:44:53 PM
If someone is truly a close friend, one will do a lot to protect a man and his son.

Depending on what it is about, I think. ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: GBMW on March 13, 2008, 03:46:10 PM


 ::MonkeyWink::  Thanks Katrien!   Do you know if Patrick knows English?  Wouldn't it be awesome  if we could get him here to provide us some inside info. or just to discuss what we have learned over the years.
[/quote]

I don't know. But the article tells:

Quote
Mondain, Marga 10Th, 2008
Uw Webspecialist brengt logste van Patrick van der Heem online
Patrick van der Heem heeft zijn eigen website geopend op deze domeinnaam. Hij heeft gekozen voor de dienstverlening van Uw Webspecialist, een bedrijf in Almelo, dat websites en webapplicaties ontwikkelt voor de zakelijk en particuliere markt.
Patrick zal op zijn website gaan belogen en reageren op nieuwsberichten in de media als dat nodig is.

The last sentence tells that Patrick will blog and react on the news in the media if necessary.

By the way: You might think I am a Patrick-friend: I do not know Patrick but I have seen all the interviews in the last few months and I knew it were all lies, because, as I told before, I have seen what one of journalists, writing about Patrick, did to a total innocent man. I could not believe journalists could be so cruel.

Patrick tells in the interview he would never harm animals.
In one of the TV interviews Patrick told that even among criminals it is "not done" to kill and rape an 18 year old girl.



[/quote]

Oh, I never suspected you knew him personally.   ::MonkeyWink:: I was just wondering if he spoke/wrote English as well as all the Dutch posters do so well here.  If he does, I would just love to somebody make contact with him somehow and get him over here.    I do so much appreciate what you all bring here and helping with translations and what's going on in the media!  ::MonkeyCool::
[/quote]

It is possible to leave comments on his site; so you can leave a suggestion / request there. I already asked if it could be possible to have an english version (just like Peter R. de Vries) of his site. Didn't he give interviews in English already? For some American shows? Thought so; but I might be mistaken.
I've heard a couple of conversations that people I work with had with him (we tape those conversations so they can be broadcasted...but only a few sentences are being broadcast) and he seems like a really nice guy. He was very polite and friendly every time.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: private eye on March 13, 2008, 03:56:18 PM
Posted by Kyle at BFN when someone posted about Psychics:

I hope you don't find this deflating.  Many of you probably won't want to hear this, but it's what we've observed in the field. 
The Aruban police had on file a 9" thick stack of psychic "revelations" ranging from the absolutely absurd to the plausible, to the down right convincing.  These statements came from literally hundreds of opportunist psychics from around the world coming out of woodwork.  The only thing all each of these statements had in common is that they all had remarkable inconsistencies in them which made them provably bogus based on case information not made public.  In short, I believe some people are truly gifted with fantastic imaginations and passions but we as humans are not made to know the future. If a psychic nailed every detail of this case retrospectively, they should be arrested for their involvement. The statements which were very convincing could be replicated based on a solid handle on the publicly available case information with gaps imaginatively filled in.  The problem in putting too much faith in these people is that it inevitably leads to wasting a lot of time and resources and will frustrate the team tremendously.  While in the field, we received literally hundreds of leads from psychics who knew with "absolute certainty" where Natalee's body was.  The danger in a case like this is losing hope.  When we lose hope, we cling on to anything we've got.  This makes us very susceptible to being deceived.  We want to believe someone has the answers and is capable of handing those answers over to us on a silver platter.  The problem is this just isn't reality.  It never will be.  It's a cruel realization but the sooner it's accepted the faster one can sort through the deception to find the answers based on evidence which will hold up in court.

I don't believe that Kyle or anyone else is allowed to review the case documents, according to the policy of the prosecutors office. I thought the beauty of the Persistence is that they were to do a true grid seach mission which depends not on psychics or even tips from the authorities, and as such their work would be independent of the investigation. They were there simply to attempt to search a predefined area for Natalee's remains. So I am not sure why they have been lured into defending the work of the Aruban authorities or a discussion of the validity of the investigation as they are not knowledgeable as to the investigation, other than what they have been told by these Arubans. There are an awful lot of highly educated people who have been chumped by people of far less formal education. A well trained police force is not thwarted by a grieving mother and the media.

And Kyle, I by no means am being disrespectful, I think you are brilliant, sincerely. But I don't think your education or work experience has prepared you for a cover up by these types of people. And I think you may be severely underestimating the education, experience, and wisdom of the monkeys and other coverup believers. Don't let them make a fool of you. We need you.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 13, 2008, 03:57:34 PM
GBMW - yes it's possible to leave comments at the end of the posts on Patricks website:

http://patrickvandereem.nl/?p=10#respond


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Flipper/Donnie29 on March 13, 2008, 03:57:58 PM
If someone is truly a close friend, one will do a lot to protect a man and his son.

Depending on what it is about, I think. ::MonkeyConfused::

Well i would do alot for my best friend, almost everything, but i would never consider to help him with a body or a crime or whatever.. No way i would help my best friend with such a thing.. People that will help like that, are also as bad as the perpetrator..

Btw Patrick talks English, ive heard him talk a couple of times in English.. no problem for him.. dont know if he as any grammatical talents though  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Dihannah1 on March 13, 2008, 03:58:22 PM


 ::MonkeyWink::  Thanks Katrien!   Do you know if Patrick knows English?  Wouldn't it be awesome  if we could get him here to provide us some inside info. or just to discuss what we have learned over the years.

I don't know. But the article tells:

Quote
Mondain, Marga 10Th, 2008
Uw Webspecialist brengt logste van Patrick van der Heem online
Patrick van der Heem heeft zijn eigen website geopend op deze domeinnaam. Hij heeft gekozen voor de dienstverlening van Uw Webspecialist, een bedrijf in Almelo, dat websites en webapplicaties ontwikkelt voor de zakelijk en particuliere markt.
Patrick zal op zijn website gaan belogen en reageren op nieuwsberichten in de media als dat nodig is.

The last sentence tells that Patrick will blog and react on the news in the media if necessary.

By the way: You might think I am a Patrick-friend: I do not know Patrick but I have seen all the interviews in the last few months and I knew it were all lies, because, as I told before, I have seen what one of journalists, writing about Patrick, did to a total innocent man. I could not believe journalists could be so cruel.

Patrick tells in the interview he would never harm animals.
In one of the TV interviews Patrick told that even among criminals it is "not done" to kill and rape an 18 year old girl.



[/quote]

Oh, I never suspected you knew him personally.   ::MonkeyWink:: I was just wondering if he spoke/wrote English as well as all the Dutch posters do so well here.  If he does, I would just love to somebody make contact with him somehow and get him over here.    I do so much appreciate what you all bring here and helping with translations and what's going on in the media!  ::MonkeyCool::
[/quote]

It is possible to leave comments on his site; so you can leave a suggestion / request there. I already asked if it could be possible to have an english version (just like Peter R. de Vries) of his site. Didn't he give interviews in English already? For some American shows? Thought so; but I might be mistaken.
I've heard a couple of conversations that people I work with had with him (we tape those conversations so they can be broadcasted...but only a few sentences are being broadcast) and he seems like a really nice guy. He was very polite and friendly every time.
[/quote]

I missed any interviews here in the US, as I've been very busy, so missing alot here on the forum and news lately (it's driving me crazy trying to get caught up!).  But good point.  And good idea about his blog, I believe i will leave a message about SM, and anybody that hasn't yet, may do so too?

Thanks all and forgive my being behind.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Dihannah1 on March 13, 2008, 04:01:52 PM
If someone is truly a close friend, one will do a lot to protect a man and his son.

Depending on what it is about, I think. ::MonkeyConfused::

Well i would do alot for my best friend, almost everything, but i would never consider to help him with a body or a crime or whatever.. No way i would help my best friend with such a thing.. People that will help like that, are also as bad as the perpetrator..

Btw Patrick talks English, ive heard him talk a couple of times in English.. no problem for him.. dont know if he as any grammatical talents though  ::MonkeyWink::

EXACTLY!  I cherish my friends and am very loyal and also would do "almost" anything for them and my family.  However, THERE ARE limits!  I would never condone anything illegal, let alone protect them form illegal wrongdoing, ESPECIALLY MURDER or RAPE!   Nobody is worth that much and who needs friends like that anyways! ???


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: private eye on March 13, 2008, 04:21:14 PM
If someone is truly a close friend, one will do a lot to protect a man and his son.

Depending on what it is about, I think. ::MonkeyConfused::

Well i would do alot for my best friend, almost everything, but i would never consider to help him with a body or a crime or whatever.. No way i would help my best friend with such a thing.. People that will help like that, are also as bad as the perpetrator..

Btw Patrick talks English, ive heard him talk a couple of times in English.. no problem for him.. dont know if he as any grammatical talents though  ::MonkeyWink::

Because that is totally foreign to your life experiences. But would it be to a police chief?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: katrien on March 13, 2008, 04:36:15 PM
[Because that is totally foreign to your life experiences. But would it be to a police chief?


Maybe I don not understand what you mean.

Is a police chief different than other human beings?



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: mojo on March 13, 2008, 04:53:17 PM


hardly, after it came out the kalpoe's lawyer was stating he was taking dr. phil down (although he's doing well enough on that score himself) and that it "cleared" his client since joran said they were dumb and didn't know anything....the real issue is whether or not the judge actually forces the kalpoes to produce the documents or accepts the defenses arguments for a dismissal. in any event the behavior of dr phil and his cohorts lacks integrity IMO.
[/quote]

how has dr. phil and his cohorts acted with less than integrity?
dennisintn
[/quote]

dennis, they misrepresent themselves. he's as bad as geraldo as far as i'm concerned. if you disagree, let's just agree to disagree, it's really not worth getting into a long drawn out discussion and frankly irrelevant as far as i'm concerned. i'd love to have his lawyers wipe the floor with the kalpoes, but i suspect the most we can hope for is that the case is dismissed.

i don't see them producing the documents or ever going on the stand. sadly.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: private eye on March 13, 2008, 05:12:41 PM
[Because that is totally foreign to your life experiences. But would it be to a police chief?


Maybe I don not understand what you mean.

Is a police chief different than other human beings?



I think in general they are a little more acclimated to these situations, yes, but I think this one is just crooked:)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: WhiskeyGirl on March 13, 2008, 06:35:32 PM
~ Spring Break Advisory ~

Quote
Spring break is time for fun, not stupidity; stay safe on vacation following these tips

Use buddy system wherever you go

By Lynda Shrager
Albany Times Union

Published on Thursday, Mar 13, 2008

Every time my daughter gets up the courage to broach the subject of going away for spring break with her friends, I look at her and say two words: Natalee Holloway. This year, she is a 21-year-old college junior, so I have finally weakened and said yes to Florida this month. But don't for a moment think she'll be leaving without a lengthy tutorial plus a list of tips to pack next to her suntan lotion.
snip
A recent University of Wisconsin study reported that 75 percent of college males and 45 percent of females were intoxicated daily during spring break (I'm beginning to change my mind).
snip
Date rape drugs such as Rohypnol or ''GHB'' are odorless, colorless, and tasteless and have been implicated in many spring break incidents. (Maybe I'll just check into the room next door.)
Just remember Holloway, 18, who disappeared in 2005 while on spring break in Aruba.

Tips for students

Organize these safety tips so all you have is fun:

• Don't go anywhere without using the buddy system. Three is best because if someone gets into trouble, one can stay while the other goes for help. If someone seems is missing for more than a few minutes, start a search.

• Don't leave drinks unattended; don't take drinks from strangers; and try to watch your drink being poured.

• If someone ''passes out'' from drinking, position him or her on the side to prevent choking and call 911 if he or she is not easily roused.

• Don't let anyone in your group leave with someone he or she just met, no matter how hard he or she might try to convince you.

• Someone at home should have a copy of your itinerary, including hotels and cell phone numbers of people in your group.

• Carry identification, enter emergency contacts in your cell phone address book under the name ''ICE'' (in case of emergency) and have pertinent medical information in your wallet.

Read more here (http://www.ohio.com/lifestyle/16634876.html?page=all&c=y)



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: WhiskeyGirl on March 13, 2008, 06:51:48 PM
Quote
"Liar, Liar"  Submitted: 03/13/2008
snip
Lynn Garner-Robbins, owner and President of Voice Analysis Technologies in Madison, says, "People lie because they're emotionally attached to something, People will lie because they're trying to cover up for someone they love."
snip
She helped create a program that can detect if you're lying...even if you don't know you're doing it.

Garner-Robbins says, "If I asked you where you lived and you said Rhinelander, Wisconsin and you really lived in Eagle River, you may not have meant to deceive me but you didn't think I knew where Eagle River was and thought I knew where Rhinelander was so you used Rhinelander which showed inaccuracy."

It's called layered voice analysis and it can not only tell if you're lying through a real-time interview but it can also tell if you're lying through a previously recorded statement such as the statement made by Bill Clinton about Monica Lewinsky and the interview of Joran Van der Sloot about Natalie Holloway.

The computer software is based on the frequency in our voice and can detect almost anything.

Garner-Robbins says, "So when you're speaking I see deception, truthfulness, inaccuracy, probable false, high excitement, stress."

The technology can also point out embarassment, drug usage or mental illness.

And it's not limited to English.

While hundreds of Law Enforcement agencies around the state and the country use this software, Garner-Robbins is hoping her program will soon be used for insurance fraud, law enforcement on sex offenders and military intelligence.

Garner-Robbins adds, "It's a means of getting information without the impositions of doing some of the things that we hear about in the news like waterboarding and other tactics."

And while everyone lies, she hopes her tactics will make sure no one gets away with it.

Lynn Garner-Robbins says her software isn't admissible in court right now, but she believes that will change in the future.

Written By: Chad Silber


http://www.wjfw.com/email_story.html?SKU=20080313155051

Where have I heard about voice analysis before?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Kermit on March 13, 2008, 06:53:32 PM
I miss him too

I miss him also.  Very kind to me, always comments on my comments, I do appreciate him.

Just to make it clear, ******* is not banned. 


Exodus 8:28-32 Integrity is giving your word and keeping it.

From what I read, ******* appears to have integrity.
I hope he comes back.







It is very discouraging when you give your all to the cause of justice for Natalee and ... then your integrity is negated through accusations.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2694.new#new



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: ldstlou on March 13, 2008, 06:57:10 PM
Posted by Kyle at BFN when someone posted about Psychics:

I hope you don't find this deflating.  Many of you probably won't want to hear this, but it's what we've observed in the field. 
The Aruban police had on file a 9" thick stack of psychic "revelations" ranging from the absolutely absurd to the plausible, to the down right convincing.  These statements came from literally hundreds of opportunist psychics from around the world coming out of woodwork.  The only thing all each of these statements had in common is that they all had remarkable inconsistencies in them which made them provably bogus based on case information not made public.  In short, I believe some people are truly gifted with fantastic imaginations and passions but we as humans are not made to know the future. If a psychic nailed every detail of this case retrospectively, they should be arrested for their involvement. The statements which were very convincing could be replicated based on a solid handle on the publicly available case information with gaps imaginatively filled in.  The problem in putting too much faith in these people is that it inevitably leads to wasting a lot of time and resources and will frustrate the team tremendously.  While in the field, we received literally hundreds of leads from psychics who knew with "absolute certainty" where Natalee's body was.  The danger in a case like this is losing hope.  When we lose hope, we cling on to anything we've got.  This makes us very susceptible to being deceived.  We want to believe someone has the answers and is capable of handing those answers over to us on a silver platter.  The problem is this just isn't reality.  It never will be.  It's a cruel realization but the sooner it's accepted the faster one can sort through the deception to find the answers based on evidence which will hold up in court.

What a great post. And the danger in this case IS losing hope. None of us have lost hope or we would stop coming here. So many keep the faith, I learned that in doing my small part at the St Louis Travel Show. My part was small, taking a Sunday off,  making calls and e-mails and yet there were moments I wanted to quit, there really were. So many people are so willing to send you their blessings, but to get people to actually take a stand, take a Sunday off, it's not easy!!! But there are so many people dedicated to finding Justice for Natalee, that the Spirit of Natalee and Justice just picks you up and keeps you going!!! It is a miraculous thing to me.

You see the miracle working right here, Klaas, is a miracle to me!!! How do you do what Klaas does day in and day out without seeing results? How do you do that? I don't have the answer other than she is just an exceptional woman. And Koolkat and Justice for Natalee, how do you keep giving every month, travel show after travel show, spending money and time that really must have an affect on your life and your family after 3 years. And I am sorry for those I haven't mentioned, the list just goes on and on!!!!

And how does Beth do it? How do you go to Aruba expecting "new evidence" and instead get interrogated for 5 hours and yet still have enough faith to get a call from Peter DeVries saying "I think I've got something", and not knowing whether it is "something" or not, just blindly jump on a plane and go?
And how do you watch the man you know ended your daughter's life admit he was there and watched Natalee in distress and instead of calling for help say I threw her into the ocean and never lost a night of sleep and be able to get out of bed each day and fight back? How do you do that??!!!
The answer as Beth so eloquently explains, is Faith and Hope.

Faith is something the Monkeys have an abundance of. Faith and hope is what draws me back day in and day out to Scared Monkeys. Faith and Hope is what makes me so damned proud to say I am a part of this special group of people. And like with every "family" we have our squabbles. But just remember as we agree and disagree in our discussions, that yes we are family, and we will over look our squabbles, but with every TV show, with every show Dana has on, with every travel show we work, we invite new members into our world of Faith and Hope, and we just have to be careful how we treat each other and careful of the message we send out.
I learned this the hard way!!! lol My own brother was shocked and appalled by my Fat Bastard MIP6 and my Chuckierat. lol Never for a moment did I stop and think of how it looked to people who did not know the story. So, I just want to say, be gentle with each other, be aware of our new visitors, keep the Faith and the Hope...AND KLAAS SO ROCKS!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Destiny on March 13, 2008, 07:01:42 PM
Since it is slow...thought I'd share this...enjoy!

Sent to me by a friend....had to share..Destiny ;-)

WAX is Not your Friend

All hair removal methods have tricked women with their promises of easy, painless removal - The epilady, scissors, razors, Nair and now...the wax.

My night began as any other normal weeknight. Come home, fix dinner, play with the kids. I then had the thought that would ring painfully in my mind for the next few hours: "Maybe I should pull the waxing kit out of the medicine cabinet." So I headed to the site of my demise: the bathroom.

It was one of those "cold wax" kits. No melting a clump of hot wax, you just rub the strips together in your hand, they get warm and you peel them apart and press them to your leg (or wherever else) and you pull the hair right off. No muss, no fuss. How hard can it be? I mean, I'm not a genius, but I am mechanically inclined enough to figure this out. (YA THINK!?!)

So I pull one of the thin strips out. Its two strips facing each other stuck together. Instead of rubbing them together, my genius kicks in so I get out the hair dryer and heat it to 1000 degrees. ("Cold wax," yeah...right! ) I lay the strip across my thigh. Hold the skin around it tight and pull. It works!

OK, so it wasn't the best feeling, but it wasn't too bad. I can do this! Hair removal no longer eludes me! I am She-rah, fighter of all wayward body hair and maker of smooth skin extraordinaire.

With my next wax strip I move north. After checking on the kids, I sneak back into the bathroom, for the ultimate hair fighting championship. I drop my panties and place one foot on the toilet. Using the same procedure, I apply! the one strip across the right side of my bikini line, covering the right half of my *hoo-hoo* and stretching down to the inside of my butt cheek (Yes, it was a long strip) I inhale deeply and brace myself....RRRRIIIPP P!!!!

I'm blind!!! Blinded from pain!!!!.... OH MY GOD!!!!!!!!! Vision returning, I notice that I've only managed to pull off half the strip. CRAP!!!

Another deep breath and RRIIPP!! Everything is swirly and spotted. I think I may pass out...must stay conscious... Do I hear crashing drums??? Breathe, breathe...OK, back to normal.

I want to see my trophy - a wax covered strip, the one that has caused me so much pain, with my hairy pelt sticking to it. I want to revel in the glory that is my triumph over body hair. I hold up the strip! There's no hair on it. Where is the hair??? WHERE IS THE WAX???

Slowly I ease my head down, foot still perched on the toilet. I see the hair. The hair that should be on the strip. I touch. I am touching wax.

CRAP! I run my fingers over the most sensitive part of my body, which is now covered in cold wax and matted hair. Then I make the next BIG mistake...remember my foot is still propped up
on the toilet? I know I need to do something. So I put my foot down.

DANG!!!!!!!! I hear the slamming of a cell door. *hoo-hoo*? Sealed shut!

Butt?? Sealed shut!

I penguin walk around the bathroom trying to figure out what to do and think to myself "Please don't let me get the urge to poop. My head may pop off!" What can I do to melt the wax? Hot water!! Hot water melts wax!!!

I'll run the hottest water I can stand into the bathtub, get in, immerse the wax-covered bits and the wax should melt and I can gently wipe it off, right??? WRONG!!!!!!!

I get in the tub - the water is slightly hotter than that used to torture prisoners of war or sterilize surgical equipment - I sit.

Now, the only thing worse than having your nether regions glued together is having them glued together and then glued to the bottom of the tub...in scalding hot water Which, by the way, doesn't melt cold wax.

So, now I'm stuck to the bottom of the tub as though I had cement-epoxied myself to the porcelain!!

God bless the man who had convinced me a few months ago to have a phone put in the bathroom!!!! !

I call my friend, thinking surely she has waxed before and has some secret of how to get me undone. It's a very good conversation starter - "So, my butt and who-ha are glued together to the bottom of the tub!"

There is a slight pause. She doesn't know any secret tricks for removal but she does try to hide her laughter from me. She wants to know exactly where the wax is located, "Are we talking cheeks or who-ha?"

She's laughing out loud by now...I can hear her. I give her the rundown and she suggests I call the number on the side of the box YEAH!!!!! Right!! I should be the joke of someone else's night.

While we go through various solutions. I resort to scraping the wax off with a razor. Nothing feels better then to have your girlie goodies covered in hot wax, glued shut, stuck to the tub in super hot water and then dry-shaving the sticky wax off!!

By now the brain is not working, dignity has taken a major hike and I'm pretty sure I'm going to need Post-Traumatic Stress counseling for this event.

My friend is still talking with me when I finally see my saving grace....the lotion they give you to remove the excess wax. What do I really have to lose at this point? I rub some on and OH MY GOD!!!!!!! The scream probably woke the kids and scared the dickens out of my friend.

It's sooo painful, but I really don't care. "IT WORKS!! It works!!" I get a hearty congratulation from my friend and she hangs up.

I successfully remove the remainder of the wax and then notice to my grief and despair....! THE HAIR IS STILL THERE....... ALL OF IT!!!!!!!!!! So I recklessly shave it off. Heck, I'm numb by now. Nothing hurts. I could have amputated my own leg at this point.

Next week I'm going to try hair color...... Now that's funny ........
Notttttttttt


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Pita on March 13, 2008, 07:13:20 PM
I miss him too

I miss him also.  Very kind to me, always comments on my comments, I do appreciate him.

Just to make it clear, ******* is not banned. 


Exodus 8:28-32 Integrity is giving your word and keeping it.

From what I read, ******* appears to have integrity.
I hope he comes back.







It is very discouraging when you give your all to the cause of justice for Natalee and ... then your integrity is negated through accusations.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2694.new#new


******* needs to come back.  It's not the same here without him.  


~~COME BACK *******~~


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: ldstlou on March 13, 2008, 07:19:26 PM
Posted by Kyle at BFN when someone posted about Psychics:

I hope you don't find this deflating.  Many of you probably won't want to hear this, but it's what we've observed in the field. 
The Aruban police had on file a 9" thick stack of psychic "revelations" ranging from the absolutely absurd to the plausible, to the down right convincing.  These statements came from literally hundreds of opportunist psychics from around the world coming out of woodwork.  The only thing all each of these statements had in common is that they all had remarkable inconsistencies in them which made them provably bogus based on case information not made public.  In short, I believe some people are truly gifted with fantastic imaginations and passions but we as humans are not made to know the future. If a psychic nailed every detail of this case retrospectively, they should be arrested for their involvement. The statements which were very convincing could be replicated based on a solid handle on the publicly available case information with gaps imaginatively filled in.  The problem in putting too much faith in these people is that it inevitably leads to wasting a lot of time and resources and will frustrate the team tremendously.  While in the field, we received literally hundreds of leads from psychics who knew with "absolute certainty" where Natalee's body was.  The danger in a case like this is losing hope.  When we lose hope, we cling on to anything we've got.  This makes us very susceptible to being deceived.  We want to believe someone has the answers and is capable of handing those answers over to us on a silver platter.  The problem is this just isn't reality.  It never will be.  It's a cruel realization but the sooner it's accepted the faster one can sort through the deception to find the answers based on evidence which will hold up in court.

What a great post. And the danger in this case IS losing hope. None of us have lost hope or we would stop coming here. So many keep the faith, I learned that in doing my small part at the St Louis Travel Show. My part was small, taking a Sunday off,  making calls and e-mails and yet there were moments I wanted to quit, there really were. So many people are so willing to send you their blessings, but to get people to actually take a stand, take a Sunday off, it's not easy!!! But there are so many people dedicated to finding Justice for Natalee, that the Spirit of Natalee and Justice just picks you up and keeps you going!!! It is a miraculous thing to me.

You see the miracle working right here, Klaas, is a miracle to me!!! How do you do what Klaas does day in and day out without seeing results? How do you do that? I don't have the answer other than she is just an exceptional woman. And Koolkat and Justice for Natalee, how do you keep giving every month, travel show after travel show, spending money and time that really must have an affect on your life and your family after 3 years. And I am sorry for those I haven't mentioned, the list just goes on and on!!!!

And how does Beth do it? How do you go to Aruba expecting "new evidence" and instead get interrogated for 5 hours and yet still have enough faith to get a call from Peter DeVries saying "I think I've got something", and not knowing whether it is "something" or not, just blindly jump on a plane and go?
And how do you watch the man you know ended your daughter's life admit he was there and watched Natalee in distress and instead of calling for help say I threw her into the ocean and never lost a night of sleep and be able to get out of bed each day and fight back? How do you do that??!!!
The answer as Beth so eloquently explains, is Faith and Hope.

Faith is something the Monkeys have an abundance of. Faith and hope is what draws me back day in and day out to Scared Monkeys. Faith and Hope is what makes me so damned proud to say I am a part of this special group of people. And like with every "family" we have our squabbles. But just remember as we agree and disagree in our discussions, that yes we are family, and we will over look our squabbles, but with every TV show, with every show Dana has on, with every travel show we work, we invite new members into our world of Faith and Hope, and we just have to be careful how we treat each other and careful of the message we send out.
I learned this the hard way!!! lol My own brother was shocked and appalled by my Fat Bastard MIP6 and my Chuckierat. lol Never for a moment did I stop and think of how it looked to people who did not know the story. So, I just want to say, be gentle with each other, be aware of our new visitors, keep the Faith and the Hope...AND KLAAS SO ROCKS!!!!

******* and Anna, we need you BOTH back!!! You are both part of this "disfunctional family" we call Scared Monkeys!!! lol

We Stand for the Girl!!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: bluwaters on March 13, 2008, 07:28:09 PM
Private Eye

I worked for the Provincial Telecommunication Company ... right out of high school (17 years old) and ... took a retirement package 40 years later.  I took a 10 year break in between to be at home with my two eldest.  I held several positions within the company over the years but ... my final position was this wannabe detective's dream job.  Using a locator system ... I traced missing/stolen equipment of VERY high value.

Sometimes I wish I had not been so anxious to take that retirement package ... I really miss my job and ... the people.

Thank you for asking.

Have a good day Monkeys ... I am off.

Janet


Janet

No doubt they miss you too! I am in awe of your lightning speed posts of relevant documents. You are always spot on!

SeaSearcher  (http://i92.photobucket.com/albums/l28/TallyAnna/smilies/welcome2.gif)

I am missing ******* and Anna.  ::MonkeyWaa:: I hope that they will return soon.

A big shout out to the Dutch posters and the great work on translations! (http://i92.photobucket.com/albums/l28/TallyAnna/smilies/wavecrowd.gif)

**********

I do believe that the arrest on J2K in Nov 07 was simply trumped up to make it appear that Aruba had done everything possible before closing the case. It also served to raise the bar higher on any subsequent request for arrest. It looks to me that the tactic worked, as we know the claim of "new evidence" was a lie and even led to further harassment of Beth and Dave by the "investigators" on Aruba.

Did Joran know that Patrick was taping him? I doubt it, especially as the case was officially closed and, due to the taped conversations, is now open again. Even if Joran thought that he could help 2K's case with Dr. Phil and be rewarded with lots of $$$, it seems that reopening the investigation would be too much of risk. On the other hand, Joran is a risk taker and greedy too. He may be smart, but the boy's got no sense, IMO.  ::MonkeyConfused::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: JE on March 13, 2008, 07:37:09 PM
Quote
"Liar, Liar"  Submitted: 03/13/2008
snip
Lynn Garner-Robbins, owner and President of Voice Analysis Technologies in Madison, says, "People lie because they're emotionally attached to something, People will lie because they're trying to cover up for someone they love."
snip
She helped create a program that can detect if you're lying...even if you don't know you're doing it.

Garner-Robbins says, "If I asked you where you lived and you said Rhinelander, Wisconsin and you really lived in Eagle River, you may not have meant to deceive me but you didn't think I knew where Eagle River was and thought I knew where Rhinelander was so you used Rhinelander which showed inaccuracy."

It's called layered voice analysis and it can not only tell if you're lying through a real-time interview but it can also tell if you're lying through a previously recorded statement such as the statement made by Bill Clinton about Monica Lewinsky and the interview of Joran Van der Sloot about Natalie Holloway.

The computer software is based on the frequency in our voice and can detect almost anything.

Garner-Robbins says, "So when you're speaking I see deception, truthfulness, inaccuracy, probable false, high excitement, stress."

The technology can also point out embarassment, drug usage or mental illness.

And it's not limited to English.

While hundreds of Law Enforcement agencies around the state and the country use this software, Garner-Robbins is hoping her program will soon be used for insurance fraud, law enforcement on sex offenders and military intelligence.

Garner-Robbins adds, "It's a means of getting information without the impositions of doing some of the things that we hear about in the news like waterboarding and other tactics."

And while everyone lies, she hopes her tactics will make sure no one gets away with it.

Lynn Garner-Robbins says her software isn't admissible in court right now, but she believes that will change in the future.

Written By: Chad Silber


http://www.wjfw.com/email_story.html?SKU=20080313155051

Where have I heard about voice analysis before?

http://scaredmonkeys.com/2006/03/10/joran-van-der-sloot-so-the-media-thinks-he-is-suddenly-telling-the-truth-huh/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: LilPuma on March 13, 2008, 07:38:20 PM
My monthly fly-by before dinner or bed or whatever.  I just want to keep my name in the Stand with the Girl roster and let those of you holding down the fort know that while I don't post here, I'm still with you.  I stopped trying to keep up with all the threads and posts a long time ago, but I wanted to comment on the few I just read. 

I like Anna and *******'s posts.  Hopefully they'll both come back after a cooling off period.  Don't really know what all that was about. 

I only use gentle depilatories for said bikini waxing.  Have aloe lotion or leaf ready afterward is my advice.  Funny post. 

I've been "in love" with DeVries and I think maybe EURobert and now Patrick, since I've read he said he has never hurt an animal and never would.  I liked hearing that even the bad guys think that drugging, raping and killing an 18 year old woman makes you scum. 

The only way a psychic is going to help in this case is if they had a reliable one (proven track record with police work) working with an investigator.  Psychics aren't omniscient, but they can help.  If you have a chance to watch psychic detectives on Court TV, do it.  You'll see how they work.  No hocus pocus about it.  Just people with a gift adding bits and pieces to the investigation. 

I wish there was news.  But as someone said, we have an abundance of faith. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: WhiskeyGirl on March 13, 2008, 07:49:28 PM
Voice Analysis - I wonder how many people have made use of Joran's many public interviews?  I wonder how many would make a study of his recorded ALE interrogations?

Zoltan Zion had a piece on his site about voice analsys and it pointed to National Geographic of all places!   ::MonkeyWink::

Quote
Nothing but the Truth

A couple of months ago, a number of major news outlets got all fired up about a planned security measure at Moscow's Domodedovo International Airport. The source of their excitement? The GK1 voice analysis system, which Moscow expects to implement by July. The reports described the device as a lie detector, which the airport was quick to deny. Thankfully, IT has come along to set the record straight.

The airport is right in saying that the device (which poses questions on a screen that travelers answer out loud) is not technically a lie detector, as standard-issue polygraphs measure physiological phenomena like blood pressure and sweat production, not voice. (The "deception detection" community questions the validity of voice as a stress measurement tool.) Still, the lady doth appear to protest a little too much. After all, the avowed purpose of the device is to detect the "psychological and emotional state" of passengers to determine whether they are "about to commit a crime."
http://www.nationalgeographic.com/traveler/extras/blog/blog0605_5.html

and

Rise of the Machines: Surveillance Software Gets Smart
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2006/02/0222_060222_wiretapping.html



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: WhiskeyGirl on March 13, 2008, 07:57:41 PM
My monthly fly-by before dinner or bed or whatever.  I just want to keep my name in the Stand with the Girl roster and let those of you holding down the fort know that while I don't post here, I'm still with you.  I stopped trying to keep up with all the threads and posts a long time ago, but I wanted to comment on the few I just read. 

I like Anna and *******'s posts.  Hopefully they'll both come back after a cooling off period.  Don't really know what all that was about. 

I only use gentle depilatories for said bikini waxing.  Have aloe lotion or leaf ready afterward is my advice.  Funny post. 

I've been "in love" with DeVries and I think maybe EURobert and now Patrick, since I've read he said he has never hurt an animal and never would.  I liked hearing that even the bad guys think that drugging, raping and killing an 18 year old woman makes you scum. 

The only way a psychic is going to help in this case is if they had a reliable one (proven track record with police work) working with an investigator.  Psychics aren't omniscient, but they can help.  If you have a chance to watch psychic detectives on Court TV, do it.  You'll see how they work.  No hocus pocus about it.  Just people with a gift adding bits and pieces to the investigation. 

I wish there was news.  But as someone said, we have an abundance of faith. 

Anna and ******* have certainly left behind a mystery.   :2saywhaa:

I hope they find their way back.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: LilPuma on March 13, 2008, 08:09:39 PM
It's a shame that anything or anyone from One Crappy Island could cause a rift between monkeys.  Shouldn't happen. 

The bigger mystery is why no one from The Hague (or whoever ALE answers to), has handed out any reprimands or anything in this case in spite of the ridiculous way the whole thing was handled. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: private eye on March 13, 2008, 08:16:49 PM
Posted by Kyle at BFN when someone posted about Psychics:

I hope you don't find this deflating.  Many of you probably won't want to hear this, but it's what we've observed in the field. 
The Aruban police had on file a 9" thick stack of psychic "revelations" ranging from the absolutely absurd to the plausible, to the down right convincing.  These statements came from literally hundreds of opportunist psychics from around the world coming out of woodwork.  The only thing all each of these statements had in common is that they all had remarkable inconsistencies in them which made them provably bogus based on case information not made public.  In short, I believe some people are truly gifted with fantastic imaginations and passions but we as humans are not made to know the future. If a psychic nailed every detail of this case retrospectively, they should be arrested for their involvement. The statements which were very convincing could be replicated based on a solid handle on the publicly available case information with gaps imaginatively filled in.  The problem in putting too much faith in these people is that it inevitably leads to wasting a lot of time and resources and will frustrate the team tremendously.  While in the field, we received literally hundreds of leads from psychics who knew with "absolute certainty" where Natalee's body was.  The danger in a case like this is losing hope.  When we lose hope, we cling on to anything we've got.  This makes us very susceptible to being deceived.  We want to believe someone has the answers and is capable of handing those answers over to us on a silver platter.  The problem is this just isn't reality.  It never will be.  It's a cruel realization but the sooner it's accepted the faster one can sort through the deception to find the answers based on evidence which will hold up in court.

What a great post. And the danger in this case IS losing hope. None of us have lost hope or we would stop coming here. So many keep the faith, I learned that in doing my small part at the St Louis Travel Show. My part was small, taking a Sunday off,  making calls and e-mails and yet there were moments I wanted to quit, there really were. So many people are so willing to send you their blessings, but to get people to actually take a stand, take a Sunday off, it's not easy!!! But there are so many people dedicated to finding Justice for Natalee, that the Spirit of Natalee and Justice just picks you up and keeps you going!!! It is a miraculous thing to me.

You see the miracle working right here, Klaas, is a miracle to me!!! How do you do what Klaas does day in and day out without seeing results? How do you do that? I don't have the answer other than she is just an exceptional woman. And Koolkat and Justice for Natalee, how do you keep giving every month, travel show after travel show, spending money and time that really must have an affect on your life and your family after 3 years. And I am sorry for those I haven't mentioned, the list just goes on and on!!!!

And how does Beth do it? How do you go to Aruba expecting "new evidence" and instead get interrogated for 5 hours and yet still have enough faith to get a call from Peter DeVries saying "I think I've got something", and not knowing whether it is "something" or not, just blindly jump on a plane and go?
And how do you watch the man you know ended your daughter's life admit he was there and watched Natalee in distress and instead of calling for help say I threw her into the ocean and never lost a night of sleep and be able to get out of bed each day and fight back? How do you do that??!!!
The answer as Beth so eloquently explains, is Faith and Hope.

Faith is something the Monkeys have an abundance of. Faith and hope is what draws me back day in and day out to Scared Monkeys. Faith and Hope is what makes me so damned proud to say I am a part of this special group of people. And like with every "family" we have our squabbles. But just remember as we agree and disagree in our discussions, that yes we are family, and we will over look our squabbles, but with every TV show, with every show Dana has on, with every travel show we work, we invite new members into our world of Faith and Hope, and we just have to be careful how we treat each other and careful of the message we send out.
I learned this the hard way!!! lol My own brother was shocked and appalled by my Fat Bastard MIP6 and my Chuckierat. lol Never for a moment did I stop and think of how it looked to people who did not know the story. So, I just want to say, be gentle with each other, be aware of our new visitors, keep the Faith and the Hope...AND KLAAS SO ROCKS!!!!

I think we needed your spirit right about now:) Klaas is the rock of the place, the momma sometimes, and when she has to she can kick ass like the daddy:) But regardless, she shows up every day, ready to deal with whatever behavior we have decided to bring to the cage that day. And despite the trials and tribulations of her day, she always has a kind word for those who need it, or that little fact that we are trying to remember:) Thank you Klaas.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: private eye on March 13, 2008, 08:21:44 PM
Since it is slow...thought I'd share this...enjoy!

Sent to me by a friend....had to share..Destiny ;-)

WAX is Not your Friend

All hair removal methods have tricked women with their promises of easy, painless removal - The epilady, scissors, razors, Nair and now...the wax.

My night began as any other normal weeknight. Come home, fix dinner, play with the kids. I then had the thought that would ring painfully in my mind for the next few hours: "Maybe I should pull the waxing kit out of the medicine cabinet." So I headed to the site of my demise: the bathroom.

It was one of those "cold wax" kits. No melting a clump of hot wax, you just rub the strips together in your hand, they get warm and you peel them apart and press them to your leg (or wherever else) and you pull the hair right off. No muss, no fuss. How hard can it be? I mean, I'm not a genius, but I am mechanically inclined enough to figure this out. (YA THINK!?!)

So I pull one of the thin strips out. Its two strips facing each other stuck together. Instead of rubbing them together, my genius kicks in so I get out the hair dryer and heat it to 1000 degrees. ("Cold wax," yeah...right! ) I lay the strip across my thigh. Hold the skin around it tight and pull. It works!

OK, so it wasn't the best feeling, but it wasn't too bad. I can do this! Hair removal no longer eludes me! I am She-rah, fighter of all wayward body hair and maker of smooth skin extraordinaire.

With my next wax strip I move north. After checking on the kids, I sneak back into the bathroom, for the ultimate hair fighting championship. I drop my panties and place one foot on the toilet. Using the same procedure, I apply! the one strip across the right side of my bikini line, covering the right half of my *hoo-hoo* and stretching down to the inside of my butt cheek (Yes, it was a long strip) I inhale deeply and brace myself....RRRRIIIPP P!!!!

I'm blind!!! Blinded from pain!!!!.... OH MY GOD!!!!!!!!! Vision returning, I notice that I've only managed to pull off half the strip. CRAP!!!

Another deep breath and RRIIPP!! Everything is swirly and spotted. I think I may pass out...must stay conscious... Do I hear crashing drums??? Breathe, breathe...OK, back to normal.

I want to see my trophy - a wax covered strip, the one that has caused me so much pain, with my hairy pelt sticking to it. I want to revel in the glory that is my triumph over body hair. I hold up the strip! There's no hair on it. Where is the hair??? WHERE IS THE WAX???

Slowly I ease my head down, foot still perched on the toilet. I see the hair. The hair that should be on the strip. I touch. I am touching wax.

CRAP! I run my fingers over the most sensitive part of my body, which is now covered in cold wax and matted hair. Then I make the next BIG mistake...remember my foot is still propped up
on the toilet? I know I need to do something. So I put my foot down.

DANG!!!!!!!! I hear the slamming of a cell door. *hoo-hoo*? Sealed shut!

Butt?? Sealed shut!

I penguin walk around the bathroom trying to figure out what to do and think to myself "Please don't let me get the urge to poop. My head may pop off!" What can I do to melt the wax? Hot water!! Hot water melts wax!!!

I'll run the hottest water I can stand into the bathtub, get in, immerse the wax-covered bits and the wax should melt and I can gently wipe it off, right??? WRONG!!!!!!!

I get in the tub - the water is slightly hotter than that used to torture prisoners of war or sterilize surgical equipment - I sit.

Now, the only thing worse than having your nether regions glued together is having them glued together and then glued to the bottom of the tub...in scalding hot water Which, by the way, doesn't melt cold wax.

So, now I'm stuck to the bottom of the tub as though I had cement-epoxied myself to the porcelain!!

God bless the man who had convinced me a few months ago to have a phone put in the bathroom!!!! !

I call my friend, thinking surely she has waxed before and has some secret of how to get me undone. It's a very good conversation starter - "So, my butt and who-ha are glued together to the bottom of the tub!"

There is a slight pause. She doesn't know any secret tricks for removal but she does try to hide her laughter from me. She wants to know exactly where the wax is located, "Are we talking cheeks or who-ha?"

She's laughing out loud by now...I can hear her. I give her the rundown and she suggests I call the number on the side of the box YEAH!!!!! Right!! I should be the joke of someone else's night.

While we go through various solutions. I resort to scraping the wax off with a razor. Nothing feels better then to have your girlie goodies covered in hot wax, glued shut, stuck to the tub in super hot water and then dry-shaving the sticky wax off!!

By now the brain is not working, dignity has taken a major hike and I'm pretty sure I'm going to need Post-Traumatic Stress counseling for this event.

My friend is still talking with me when I finally see my saving grace....the lotion they give you to remove the excess wax. What do I really have to lose at this point? I rub some on and OH MY GOD!!!!!!! The scream probably woke the kids and scared the dickens out of my friend.

It's sooo painful, but I really don't care. "IT WORKS!! It works!!" I get a hearty congratulation from my friend and she hangs up.

I successfully remove the remainder of the wax and then notice to my grief and despair....! THE HAIR IS STILL THERE....... ALL OF IT!!!!!!!!!! So I recklessly shave it off. Heck, I'm numb by now. Nothing hurts. I could have amputated my own leg at this point.

Next week I'm going to try hair color...... Now that's funny ........
Notttttttttt


And girls use to ask themselves. "And I shaved my legs for this?" Waxing brings a whole different level of questioning for women:)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: LilPuma on March 13, 2008, 08:22:42 PM
"...she shows up every day, ready to deal with whatever behavior we have decided to bring to the cage that day..."

This is code for party later tonight in the cage when Klaas leaves for a few minutes, right? 
 ::MonkeyDance::
bbl
 ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 13, 2008, 08:23:13 PM
ldstlou and Private Eye - thank you!

Completely O/T
  ::MonkeyCool::

Click on play  ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::

http://llnw.jibjab.com/content/player.swf?content_url=http://www.jibjab.com/sendables/api/remote/LY1C5FPXqaOgCqi9IbaxWNre.xml



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Dihannah1 on March 13, 2008, 08:27:24 PM
I miss him too

I miss him also.  Very kind to me, always comments on my comments, I do appreciate him.

Just to make it clear, ******* is not banned. 


Exodus 8:28-32 Integrity is giving your word and keeping it.

From what I read, ******* appears to have integrity.
I hope he comes back.







It is very discouraging when you give your all to the cause of justice for Natalee and ... then your integrity is negated through accusations.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2694.new#new


******* needs to come back.  It's not the same here without him.  


~~COME BACK *******~~

Well since it has been brought up again....   ******* is definately a good supporter of Natalee and has provided valuable info. as well as Anna! 

My only problem is, if wer'e talking about integrity, why did Anna's posts get removed and not his?  Wouldn't the situation be better served to see both sides?  Just because he is a mod. and has the ability to remove/move and lock threads, leaves Anna at a disadvantage.   I've been here along time and I happen to like Obs AND Anna.   But let's be fair here.   Do people not have the intelligence to figure things out for themselves, other than what the mods. CHOOSE for us to see and know?   I do agree there are times where things are so unacceptable, and Klaas uses her best judgement and moves them because they don't belong here, as it should be,  but it involves other posters, not a mod who can change things to there own benefit.  We ALL contribute in some way.  Why give one the benefit over the other?  I personally know things about certain people here that I find unacceptable, but it's none of my business and those things are better left out of an open forum, ESPECIALLY by mods.  I have seen Anna attacked on a couple occassions too, but does she have the benefit of removing and leaving parts that appear in her favor only? No, she doesn't have that capability!

I'm sorry for the rant.  But it's hard for me to stay quiet when I see something that 'appears' unfair to me.

Obs,  I really do enjoy all you do here and for Natalee and I don't mean to sound like I'm attacking you.  I'm just upset how this was handled.  You as a mod. do have certain responsibilities and one of them should never be to move a thread and leave your own posts only.   It's just not fair.   I personally want to see Anna back here too!

Ok, off my rant now.  My apologies...
    I love you both,  let's just act like civil mature adults!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 13, 2008, 08:36:38 PM
Dihannah - what happened happened.  I can't put back posts that have been deleted.  The only thing I can possibly do now is delete the threads entirely after copying them. 

This is the last post I want to see in this thread on the subject.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Destiny on March 13, 2008, 08:37:42 PM
"...she shows up every day, ready to deal with whatever behavior we have decided to bring to the cage that day..."

This is code for party later tonight in the cage when Klaas leaves for a few minutes, right? 
 ::MonkeyDance::
bbl
 ::MonkeyLaugh::

Bar is open...shake...shake...shake that shaker....one olive or two?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Destiny on March 13, 2008, 08:39:06 PM
Quick question...has any Monkey located where Urine *really* is?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Destiny on March 13, 2008, 08:45:09 PM
Dana...have you tried to get Urine on your Radio Show?   If we could find him...I could try to *dance* with his ego....anyone have a phone# for Urine...I'm so *ready* to call someone....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Dihannah1 on March 13, 2008, 08:45:18 PM
Dihannah - what happened happened.  I can't put back posts that have been deleted.  The only thing I can possibly do now is delete the threads entirely after copying them. 

This is the last post I want to see in this thread on the subject.

That's why YOU should be the only mod who can move/remove.  Just like if you were attacked and you found something inaprpriate that you were 'involved' in, then Red should make that call.  It's sort of like conflict of interest.

But thank God for You and what you do here!  I know YOU have your hands full, God Bless ya!   ::MonkeyWink:: 
What we we do with you!


Sorry, had to tell you I wubbed you! :2redman:  I'm done   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 13, 2008, 08:46:06 PM
Quick question...has any Monkey located where Urine *really* is?

Nope.  We have heard Germany or a mental institution in Urecht.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: hotping on March 13, 2008, 08:47:46 PM
"...she shows up every day, ready to deal with whatever behavior we have decided to bring to the cage that day..."

This is code for party later tonight in the cage when Klaas leaves for a few minutes, right? 
 ::MonkeyDance::
bbl
 ::MonkeyLaugh::

Bar is open...shake...shake...shake that shaker....one olive or two?
TWO PLEASE!  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 13, 2008, 08:47:53 PM
Dihannah - what happened happened.  I can't put back posts that have been deleted.  The only thing I can possibly do now is delete the threads entirely after copying them. 

This is the last post I want to see in this thread on the subject.

That's why YOU should be the only mod who can move/remove.  Just like if you were attacked and you found something inaprpriate that you were 'involved' in, then Red should make that call.  It's sort of like conflict of interest.

But thank God for You and what you do here!  I know YOU have your hands full, God Bless ya!   ::MonkeyWink:: 
What we we do with you!


Sorry, had to tell you I wubbed you! :2redman:  I'm done   ::MonkeyCool::

Dihannah - you have got to be kidding?  We don't have enough moderators right now.  What good is it to have moderators without any abilities?  People are human and make mistakes. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Destiny on March 13, 2008, 08:50:58 PM
"...she shows up every day, ready to deal with whatever behavior we have decided to bring to the cage that day..."

This is code for party later tonight in the cage when Klaas leaves for a few minutes, right? 
 ::MonkeyDance::
bbl
 ::MonkeyLaugh::

Bar is open...shake...shake...shake that shaker....one olive or two?
TWO PLEASE!  ::MonkeyWink::

Stuffed with Blue Cheese?   My fav ;-)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: bluwaters on March 13, 2008, 08:52:38 PM
Dihannah - what happened happened.  I can't put back posts that have been deleted.  The only thing I can possibly do now is delete the threads entirely after copying them. 

This is the last post I want to see in this thread on the subject.

That's why YOU should be the only mod who can move/remove.  Just like if you were attacked and you found something inaprpriate that you were 'involved' in, then Red should make that call.  It's sort of like conflict of interest.

But thank God for You and what you do here!  I know YOU have your hands full, God Bless ya!   ::MonkeyWink:: 
What we we do with you!


Sorry, had to tell you I wubbed you! :2redman:  I'm done   ::MonkeyCool::

Dihannah - you have got to be kidding?  We don't have enough moderators right now.  What good is it to have moderators without any abilities?  People are human and make mistakes. 
Truer words were never spoken. Klaas, you deserve help! Perhaps it would be a good idea for mods to refrain from editing their own posts/threads?



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Dihannah1 on March 13, 2008, 08:52:53 PM
Speaking of Mods.  How is CBB doing?  I hope she's feeling better. I see alot of new avi's, better go check for an Easter Tink.

My next adventure is to try and get Patrick here.  Who's with me?  We need to get him on his blog.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Destiny on March 13, 2008, 08:52:57 PM
Quick question...has any Monkey located where Urine *really* is?

Nope.  We have heard Germany or a mental institution in Urecht.

Thanks Klaas...guess I'll try some excavating on my own....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Dihannah1 on March 13, 2008, 08:57:36 PM
Speaking of Mods.  How is CBB doing?  I hope she's feeling better. I see alot of new avi's, better go check for an Easter Tink.

I think we just need to clone 10 more of you!  We'll be fine then!  ::MonkeyHaHa::   I understand we need more and I hope Obs comes back, but with some 'rules'.  I love our mods.  either way.   Just wanted to stick up for Anna too.

SOOO, if I can't clone 10 of you (at least one for me personally,  I need SOMEBODY organized in my life :) ) My next adventure is to try and get Patrick here.  Who's with me?  We need to get him on his blog.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Destiny on March 13, 2008, 08:57:40 PM
Speaking of Mods.  How is CBB doing?  I hope she's feeling better. I see alot of new avi's, better go check for an Easter Tink.

My next adventure is to try and get Patrick here.  Who's with me?  We need to get him on his blog.

I'm in!  I offer free lodging at my Lodge...outside of Atlanta area...I could network with a couple of nationally syndicated radio hosts to get him on the air here....they frequent my business...good friends....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Dihannah1 on March 13, 2008, 09:01:15 PM
Speaking of Mods.  How is CBB doing?  I hope she's feeling better. I see alot of new avi's, better go check for an Easter Tink.

My next adventure is to try and get Patrick here.  Who's with me?  We need to get him on his blog.

I'm in!  I offer free lodging at my Lodge...outside of Atlanta area...I could network with a couple of nationally syndicated radio hosts to get him on the air here....they frequent my business...good friends....

Destiny! That's a great idea, but not what I was speaking of.  Though we should do that too!  So we can add that to our list of items.... ::MonkeyDance::

I would like to get Patrick to start posting here at SM.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: texasmom on March 13, 2008, 09:02:17 PM
Dana...have you tried to get Urine on your Radio Show?   If we could find him...I could try to *dance* with his ego....anyone have a phone# for Urine...I'm so *ready* to call someone....

YOOO HOOOO JORRAANN.....WHERE ARE YOU??? DESTINY'S CALLING......NEEDS TO TALK TO YOU........ARE YOU SKEEEEERRRRDD???  YOU CAN'T HIDE FROM DESTINY, JORAN, SHE WILL FIND YOU!!!   ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Dihannah1 on March 13, 2008, 09:04:34 PM
I mentioned this earlier and some Dutch posters recommended we add some posts to his blog.  Maybe if we have enough people ask him, we could get him to do a show AND start posting here....  So a bunch of need to hit his blog up about it.   And I'm sure he would appreciate a place to stay then next visit to the US ;)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 13, 2008, 09:07:05 PM
I mentioned this earlier and some Dutch posters recommended we add some posts to his blog.  Maybe if we have enough people ask him, we could get him to do a show AND start posting here....  So a bunch of need to hit his blog up about it.   And I'm sure he would appreciate a place to stay then next visit to the US ;)

He's not allowed in the US due to his criminal background/time in jail.  Remember, immigration sent him back to the NL when he tried to enter with DeVries.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Destiny on March 13, 2008, 09:08:25 PM
Speaking of Mods.  How is CBB doing?  I hope she's feeling better. I see alot of new avi's, better go check for an Easter Tink.

My next adventure is to try and get Patrick here.  Who's with me?  We need to get him on his blog.

I'm in!  I offer free lodging at my Lodge...outside of Atlanta area...I could network with a couple of nationally syndicated radio hosts to get him on the air here....they frequent my business...good friends....

Destiny! That's a great idea, but not what I was speaking of.  Though we should do that too!  So we can add that to our list of items.... ::MonkeyDance::

I would like to get Patrick to start posting here at SM.

Neil Boorst is a *regular* guest at my business....also many Atl based television programs...if you really want Patrick here...I can do it...I just didn't ever think it would come to this point of *getting the word out*...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Destiny on March 13, 2008, 09:12:02 PM
Dana...have you tried to get Urine on your Radio Show?   If we could find him...I could try to *dance* with his ego....anyone have a phone# for Urine...I'm so *ready* to call someone....

YOOO HOOOO JORRAANN.....WHERE ARE YOU??? DESTINY'S CALLING......NEEDS TO TALK TO YOU........ARE YOU SKEEEEERRRRDD???  YOU CAN'T HIDE FROM DESTINY, JORAN, SHE WILL FIND YOU!!!   ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyCool::

OMG/Goddess....just wet me panties....ROFLMFAO!!!!!!!!!

TM...You are my long lost Sista!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: private eye on March 13, 2008, 09:13:26 PM
ldstlou and Private Eye - thank you!

Completely O/T
  ::MonkeyCool::

Click on play  ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::

http://llnw.jibjab.com/content/player.swf?content_url=http://www.jibjab.com/sendables/api/remote/LY1C5FPXqaOgCqi9IbaxWNre.xml



Excellent idea, maybe we should have a drunk monkey night and everybody has to have drank so much by a certain time:) For some of us meeting the minimum won't be a problems. A play night:)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Destiny on March 13, 2008, 09:15:03 PM
I mentioned this earlier and some Dutch posters recommended we add some posts to his blog.  Maybe if we have enough people ask him, we could get him to do a show AND start posting here....  So a bunch of need to hit his blog up about it.   And I'm sure he would appreciate a place to stay then next visit to the US ;)

He's not allowed in the US due to his criminal background/time in jail.  Remember, immigration sent him back to the NL when he tried to enter with DeVries.

Klaas...you would not believe how many ways there are around this *issue*....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: vms on March 13, 2008, 09:15:32 PM
Hey Destiny,

It is driving me nuts trying to figure out where you are.
I live in GA. I have asked Klaas to forward my email addy to you. We may be neighbors.  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: private eye on March 13, 2008, 09:16:53 PM
Dana...have you tried to get Urine on your Radio Show?   If we could find him...I could try to *dance* with his ego....anyone have a phone# for Urine...I'm so *ready* to call someone....

YOOO HOOOO JORRAANN.....WHERE ARE YOU??? DESTINY'S CALLING......NEEDS TO TALK TO YOU........ARE YOU SKEEEEERRRRDD???  YOU CAN'T HIDE FROM DESTINY, JORAN, SHE WILL FIND YOU!!!   ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyCool::

OMG/Goddess....just wet me panties....ROFLMFAO!!!!!!!!!

TM...You are my long lost Sista!

I heard he is skeeerrrrd of a real woman:) Performance anxieties, fear of failure, inadequacies, the teeny wienie syndrome I believe is its medical label:)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Destiny on March 13, 2008, 09:20:24 PM
Hey Destiny,

It is driving me nuts trying to figure out where you are.
I live in GA. I have asked Klaas to forward my email addy to you. We may be neighbors.  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Klaas...send my email addy to anyone *YOU* want to...TY..Destiney.

VMS....I hope we are neighbors!!!!!...Lord *knows* we are family ;-)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: hotping on March 13, 2008, 09:20:45 PM
Dana...have you tried to get Urine on your Radio Show?   If we could find him...I could try to *dance* with his ego....anyone have a phone# for Urine...I'm so *ready* to call someone....

YOOO HOOOO JORRAANN.....WHERE ARE YOU??? DESTINY'S CALLING......NEEDS TO TALK TO YOU........ARE YOU SKEEEEERRRRDD???  YOU CAN'T HIDE FROM DESTINY, JORAN, SHE WILL FIND YOU!!!   ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyCool::
You are SOOOO GOOD at this TM! LMAO!  ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::

By the way Check Your Mail....I got Yours!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: vms on March 13, 2008, 09:22:17 PM
Hey Destiny,

It is driving me nuts trying to figure out where you are.
I live in GA. I have asked Klaas to forward my email addy to you. We may be neighbors.  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Klaas...send my email addy to anyone *YOU* want to...TY..Destiney.

VMS....I hope we are neighbors!!!!!...Lord *knows* we are family ;-)

A big yes to that!  ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: texasmom on March 13, 2008, 09:22:19 PM
Dana...have you tried to get Urine on your Radio Show?   If we could find him...I could try to *dance* with his ego....anyone have a phone# for Urine...I'm so *ready* to call someone....

YOOO HOOOO JORRAANN.....WHERE ARE YOU??? DESTINY'S CALLING......NEEDS TO TALK TO YOU........ARE YOU SKEEEEERRRRDD???  YOU CAN'T HIDE FROM DESTINY, JORAN, SHE WILL FIND YOU!!!   ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyCool::

OMG/Goddess....just wet me panties....ROFLMFAO!!!!!!!!!

TM...You are my long lost Sista!

 ::MonkeyHaHa::  a girl can never have too many sista's it's true!!!!  :smt052




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 13, 2008, 09:26:10 PM
Hey Destiny,

It is driving me nuts trying to figure out where you are.
I live in GA. I have asked Klaas to forward my email addy to you. We may be neighbors.  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Klaas...send my email addy to anyone *YOU* want to...TY..Destiney.

VMS....I hope we are neighbors!!!!!...Lord *knows* we are family ;-)

A big yes to that!  ::MonkeyDance::

Destiny - I just sent you VMS's email addy now it's up to you  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Destiny on March 13, 2008, 09:27:06 PM
Dana...have you tried to get Urine on your Radio Show?   If we could find him...I could try to *dance* with his ego....anyone have a phone# for Urine...I'm so *ready* to call someone....

YOOO HOOOO JORRAANN.....WHERE ARE YOU??? DESTINY'S CALLING......NEEDS TO TALK TO YOU........ARE YOU SKEEEEERRRRDD???  YOU CAN'T HIDE FROM DESTINY, JORAN, SHE WILL FIND YOU!!!   ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyCool::

OMG/Goddess....just wet me panties....ROFLMFAO!!!!!!!!!

TM...You are my long lost Sista!

I heard he is skeeerrrrd of a real woman:) Performance anxieties, fear of failure, inadequacies, the teeny wienie syndrome I believe is its medical label:)

Sung to the tune of an old song...*Yellow Polka Dot Bikini*

It's an ittsy bittsy teeney weenie...very very tiny weenie...
That they saw for the first time today...

An Ittsy bittsy teeney weenie....very very small weenie...oh how how small... is all the could say....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: texasmom on March 13, 2008, 09:30:16 PM
Dana...have you tried to get Urine on your Radio Show?   If we could find him...I could try to *dance* with his ego....anyone have a phone# for Urine...I'm so *ready* to call someone....

YOOO HOOOO JORRAANN.....WHERE ARE YOU??? DESTINY'S CALLING......NEEDS TO TALK TO YOU........ARE YOU SKEEEEERRRRDD???  YOU CAN'T HIDE FROM DESTINY, JORAN, SHE WILL FIND YOU!!!   ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyCool::
You are SOOOO GOOD at this TM! LMAO!  ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::

By the way Check Your Mail....I got Yours!
Thanks PC!   ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: private eye on March 13, 2008, 09:34:19 PM
Dana...have you tried to get Urine on your Radio Show?   If we could find him...I could try to *dance* with his ego....anyone have a phone# for Urine...I'm so *ready* to call someone....

YOOO HOOOO JORRAANN.....WHERE ARE YOU??? DESTINY'S CALLING......NEEDS TO TALK TO YOU........ARE YOU SKEEEEERRRRDD???  YOU CAN'T HIDE FROM DESTINY, JORAN, SHE WILL FIND YOU!!!   ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyCool::

OMG/Goddess....just wet me panties....ROFLMFAO!!!!!!!!!

TM...You are my long lost Sista!

I heard he is skeeerrrrd of a real woman:) Performance anxieties, fear of failure, inadequacies, the teeny wienie syndrome I believe is its medical label:)

Sung to the tune of an old song...*Yellow Polka Dot Bikini*

It's an ittsy bittsy teeney weenie...very very tiny weenie...
That they saw for the first time today...

An Ittsy bittsy teeney weenie....very very small weenie...oh how how small... is all the could say....

If you really want to get a guys goat,look at it and tell him, oh how cute:)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: private eye on March 13, 2008, 09:35:47 PM
Dana...have you tried to get Urine on your Radio Show?   If we could find him...I could try to *dance* with his ego....anyone have a phone# for Urine...I'm so *ready* to call someone....

YOOO HOOOO JORRAANN.....WHERE ARE YOU??? DESTINY'S CALLING......NEEDS TO TALK TO YOU........ARE YOU SKEEEEERRRRDD???  YOU CAN'T HIDE FROM DESTINY, JORAN, SHE WILL FIND YOU!!!   ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyCool::

OMG/Goddess....just wet me panties....ROFLMFAO!!!!!!!!!

TM...You are my long lost Sista!

 ::MonkeyHaHa::  a girl can never have too many sista's it's true!!!!  :smt052




I've got 2 daughters and the youngest one might dispute that:)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: hotping on March 13, 2008, 09:39:46 PM
Dana...have you tried to get Urine on your Radio Show?   If we could find him...I could try to *dance* with his ego....anyone have a phone# for Urine...I'm so *ready* to call someone....

YOOO HOOOO JORRAANN.....WHERE ARE YOU??? DESTINY'S CALLING......NEEDS TO TALK TO YOU........ARE YOU SKEEEEERRRRDD???  YOU CAN'T HIDE FROM DESTINY, JORAN, SHE WILL FIND YOU!!!   ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyCool::

OMG/Goddess....just wet me panties....ROFLMFAO!!!!!!!!!

TM...You are my long lost Sista!

I heard he is skeeerrrrd of a real woman:) Performance anxieties, fear of failure, inadequacies, the teeny wienie syndrome I believe is its medical label:)

Sung to the tune of an old song...*Yellow Polka Dot Bikini*

It's an ittsy bittsy teeney weenie...very very tiny weenie...
That they saw for the first time today...

An Ittsy bittsy teeney weenie....very very small weenie...oh how how small... is all the could say....
Destiny You are Sooo Precious....LMAO Again!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: hotping on March 13, 2008, 09:40:52 PM
Dana...have you tried to get Urine on your Radio Show?   If we could find him...I could try to *dance* with his ego....anyone have a phone# for Urine...I'm so *ready* to call someone....

YOOO HOOOO JORRAANN.....WHERE ARE YOU??? DESTINY'S CALLING......NEEDS TO TALK TO YOU........ARE YOU SKEEEEERRRRDD???  YOU CAN'T HIDE FROM DESTINY, JORAN, SHE WILL FIND YOU!!!   ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyCool::

OMG/Goddess....just wet me panties....ROFLMFAO!!!!!!!!!

TM...You are my long lost Sista!

I heard he is skeeerrrrd of a real woman:) Performance anxieties, fear of failure, inadequacies, the teeny wienie syndrome I believe is its medical label:)

Sung to the tune of an old song...*Yellow Polka Dot Bikini*

It's an ittsy bittsy teeney weenie...very very tiny weenie...
That they saw for the first time today...

An Ittsy bittsy teeney weenie....very very small weenie...oh how how small... is all the could say....

If you really want to get a guys goat,look at it and tell him, oh how cute:)
::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyShocked:: ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Dihannah1 on March 13, 2008, 09:41:08 PM
I mentioned this earlier and some Dutch posters recommended we add some posts to his blog.  Maybe if we have enough people ask him, we could get him to do a show AND start posting here....  So a bunch of need to hit his blog up about it.   And I'm sure he would appreciate a place to stay then next visit to the US ;)

He's not allowed in the US due to his criminal background/time in jail.  Remember, immigration sent him back to the NL when he tried to enter with DeVries.

Crap, that's right.  You know, it's a shame.  We all have skeleton's in our closets, some maybe worse than others, but he has redeemed himself and it was years aog.  He did the US a big favor and I don't see him being a threat to anybody.  Oh well,  I would still love to get him to post here.  It's worth a shot to try.... ;)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: hotping on March 13, 2008, 09:42:01 PM
Dana...have you tried to get Urine on your Radio Show?   If we could find him...I could try to *dance* with his ego....anyone have a phone# for Urine...I'm so *ready* to call someone....

YOOO HOOOO JORRAANN.....WHERE ARE YOU??? DESTINY'S CALLING......NEEDS TO TALK TO YOU........ARE YOU SKEEEEERRRRDD???  YOU CAN'T HIDE FROM DESTINY, JORAN, SHE WILL FIND YOU!!!   ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyCool::

OMG/Goddess....just wet me panties....ROFLMFAO!!!!!!!!!

TM...You are my long lost Sista!

 ::MonkeyHaHa::  a girl can never have too many sista's it's true!!!!  :smt052



Yep!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Destiny on March 13, 2008, 09:43:04 PM
Hey Destiny,

It is driving me nuts trying to figure out where you are.
I live in GA. I have asked Klaas to forward my email addy to you. We may be neighbors.  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Klaas...send my email addy to anyone *YOU* want to...TY..Destiney.

VMS....I hope we are neighbors!!!!!...Lord *knows* we are family ;-)

A big yes to that!  ::MonkeyDance::

Destiny - I just sent you VMS's email addy now it's up to you  ::MonkeyWink::

Thank You Klaas!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: texasmom on March 13, 2008, 09:46:03 PM
Dana...have you tried to get Urine on your Radio Show?   If we could find him...I could try to *dance* with his ego....anyone have a phone# for Urine...I'm so *ready* to call someone....

YOOO HOOOO JORRAANN.....WHERE ARE YOU??? DESTINY'S CALLING......NEEDS TO TALK TO YOU........ARE YOU SKEEEEERRRRDD???  YOU CAN'T HIDE FROM DESTINY, JORAN, SHE WILL FIND YOU!!!   ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyCool::

OMG/Goddess....just wet me panties....ROFLMFAO!!!!!!!!!

TM...You are my long lost Sista!

I heard he is skeeerrrrd of a real woman:) Performance anxieties, fear of failure, inadequacies, the teeny wienie syndrome I believe is its medical label:)

Sung to the tune of an old song...*Yellow Polka Dot Bikini*

It's an ittsy bittsy teeney weenie...very very tiny weenie...
That they saw for the first time today...

An Ittsy bittsy teeney weenie....very very small weenie...oh how how small... is all the could say....

If you really want to get a guys goat,look at it and tell him, oh how cute:)
::MonkeyLaugh:: 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Blue Moon on March 13, 2008, 09:46:11 PM
Dana...have you tried to get Urine on your Radio Show?   If we could find him...I could try to *dance* with his ego....anyone have a phone# for Urine...I'm so *ready* to call someone....

YOOO HOOOO JORRAANN.....WHERE ARE YOU??? DESTINY'S CALLING......NEEDS TO TALK TO YOU........ARE YOU SKEEEEERRRRDD???  YOU CAN'T HIDE FROM DESTINY, JORAN, SHE WILL FIND YOU!!!   ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyCool::

OMG/Goddess....just wet me panties....ROFLMFAO!!!!!!!!!

TM...You are my long lost Sista!

I heard he is skeeerrrrd of a real woman:) Performance anxieties, fear of failure, inadequacies, the teeny wienie syndrome I believe is its medical label:)

Sung to the tune of an old song...*Yellow Polka Dot Bikini*

It's an ittsy bittsy teeney weenie...very very tiny weenie...
That they saw for the first time today...

An Ittsy bittsy teeney weenie....very very small weenie...oh how how small... is all the could say....

Ittsy Bittsy Teeney Weenie----------I am sitting here right now watching public tv's 60's music.  It is GREAT.  Those old songs bring back memories from middle school up to high school. I better shut up now before I give away my age. (Luving Spoonful's "Do you Believe in Magic")


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 13, 2008, 09:48:26 PM

I don't believe that Kyle or anyone else is allowed to review the case documents, according to the policy of the prosecutors office. I thought the beauty of the Persistence is that they were to do a true grid seach mission which depends not on psychics or even tips from the authorities, and as such their work would be independent of the investigation. They were there simply to attempt to search a predefined area for Natalee's remains. So I am not sure why they have been lured into defending the work of the Aruban authorities or a discussion of the validity of the investigation as they are not knowledgeable as to the investigation, other than what they have been told by these Arubans. There are an awful lot of highly educated people who have been chumped by people of far less formal education. A well trained police force is not thwarted by a grieving mother and the media.

And Kyle, I by no means am being disrespectful, I think you are brilliant, sincerely. But I don't think your education or work experience has prepared you for a cover up by these types of people. And I think you may be severely underestimating the education, experience, and wisdom of the monkeys and other coverup believers. Don't let them make a fool of you. We need you.

Thank you Private Eye.

I hope with all my heart that when the crew of the Persistence returns in search of Natalee's remains ... the search will be conducted independently and ... not under the "guidance" of the Aruban police ... Aruban authorities ... Aruban prosecutor or ... an Aruban dive team.  In other words ... I hope the search will exclude the "powers that be" who have been behind the Aruban coverup ... the Aruban coverup that has denied Natalee Holloway justice by distancing Paulus and Joran van der Sloot from implication ... the Aruban coverup that has put a family throught a H--- on Earth for almost three years.

Think about it.  The enemy is not about to assist in furthering a quest to find Natalee's remains ... a guest that does not adhere to the coverup agenda.

IMO

Sincerely, Janet

++++++++++++


Jug Twitty
NANCY GRACE
October 4, 2005


JUG TWITTY: Nancy, what happened -- well, I think it was probably about 30 days after, or so, maybe the 1st of July or something. I had a meeting with Van Der Straaten, who was the police chief in charge at that time. And I went in and sat down with him and told him and Officer Sanboe (ph), who was going to take over for Van Der Straaten. He was there, too.

You know, I asked a question about, I understand that there was a statement made by Joran, where he talks about what he had done to Natalee and he described in very graphic detail, like, the stitching and embroidery and everything on Natalee`s underwear. And he goes, Oh, no, no, no. Absolutely not. Absolutely not. Well, little did he know I had just read the statements where Joran describes that to the "T," you know, two days before. But of course, I didn`t tell him that. But that`s just when I started to think something`s wrong here.

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0510/04/ng.01.html


Beth Twitty
'Scarborough Country'
October 21, 2005


HOLLOWAY TWITTY: They never—they never wanted to implicate these three young men.  They never wanted to implicate them from the beginning. And there is a list of reasons, you know, why we know that is true.

http://msnbc.msn.com/id/9796403/from/RL.2/


Beth Twitty
The Sun
January 29, 2007


Twitty recalled the first days after her daughter's disappearance and the actions of the Aruban government.

"We did everything we could in looking for her.  There was a government coverup, and it has been documented," Twitty contended. "Yet we have remained respectful and have done the right thing."

http://www.jonesborosun.com/story.php?ID=25809


Jug Twitty
'Scarborough Country'
August 11, 2005


TWITTY: ... but when they take my statement 33 days later, and they take the other guys‘ statements that were with me and ladies that were with me, you know, like 19 days later, it‘s like they didn‘t want to find the truth.  

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8925176/


Beth Twitty
'Rita Cosby Live & Direct'
December 5, 2005


TWITTY: ... Remember, within the first 24 hours, we knew who the suspects were. We knew the persons that Natalee were taken from Carlos and Charlie‘s. We knew the license plate of the gray Honda they placed her in. We knew the condition that Natalee was in. We knew the behavior or the conduct in which they engaged in with Natalee.

And then not only that, Jane, within 72 hours, we knew that their first story was totally fabricated, that within the first 72 hours, I faced a room of 12 -- at least 12 detectives, Aruban and Dutch detectives, and a lead detective, Dennis Jacobs (ph), and they knew after we reviewed video footage from the Holiday Inn casino lobby that my daughter had never been brought back to the Holiday Inn. They knew that those suspects were fabricating a story from day one.

<snipped>

TWITTY: Well, Jane, something that the family knew—and we have to keep reminding everyone—after 72 hours -- 72 hours—we knew definitively that these suspects were not telling the truth. We knew that my daughter had never been brought back to the Holiday Inn. Of course we were becoming frustrated. Who wouldn‘t, at this point? You know, we—and what was so unbelievable about this, is they knew this information and still chose to pursue the two security guards on June the 5th.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10348437/


Beth Twitty
DR. PHIL SHOW
January 29, 2006


BETH: There are times when we're thinking that we need to continue, and of course we're still searching for answers, but it's this rollercoaster ride. And it makes me so angry, Dr. Phil, when I let myself fall for information coming out of an official who represents the island of Aruba. If somebody presents you with false hope and false information, it's devastating.

http://www.drphil.com/slideshows/slideshow/3041/?id=1&slide=3&null=null


Dave Holloway
Corruption in Paradise

Page 183

I commented to Jacobs about how short my statement was. He said that I could add anything I wanted to it. Also, I noticed that Eric Soemers's name was on it, but that detective was not even present during the interview. Now I wondered if Jacobs was making up everyone's statement and getting Eric to sign on to them. If that were the case, he could state anything he wanted, and it would look like an official statement made in front of a witness.


Dave Holloway
On the Record w/ Greta
April 11, 2006


HOLLOWAY: Oh, the media was our best friend. If it hadn't been for the media this thing would have been swept under the table the very first day and we'd have been calling back to Aruba "Have you heard anything? Have you heard anything?" I truly believe that.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,191377,00.html


oceanexploration
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #715 1/25 -
« Reply #103 on: January 26, 2008, 12:38:25 PM »


Thought you all may find this interesting if you're willing to accept it-

To date, the Aruban police and dive team has been a tremendous help.  They've honestly done a great job. Over the last month we've established a very good working relationship based on openness and trust.  Most of the relationship success was due to getting the media out of the way and working together shoulder to shoulder over time.  We've helped each other however and whenever we can.  They've treated us with decency and respect and we have treated them as friends and allies, which they are. Most of the police and divers are new since this case started and both eager and careful to do things right.  I wish we had a month ahead of the project just to establish the relationships and trust. I know many of you would likely doubt this view, but it's based on the experiences in the field of the entire search team. I too was extremely worried, paranoid, and suspecting in the beginning.  Now, it's clear we're all working towards a common goal.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: private eye on March 13, 2008, 09:56:35 PM

I don't believe that Kyle or anyone else is allowed to review the case documents, according to the policy of the prosecutors office. I thought the beauty of the Persistence is that they were to do a true grid seach mission which depends not on psychics or even tips from the authorities, and as such their work would be independent of the investigation. They were there simply to attempt to search a predefined area for Natalee's remains. So I am not sure why they have been lured into defending the work of the Aruban authorities or a discussion of the validity of the investigation as they are not knowledgeable as to the investigation, other than what they have been told by these Arubans. There are an awful lot of highly educated people who have been chumped by people of far less formal education. A well trained police force is not thwarted by a grieving mother and the media.

And Kyle, I by no means am being disrespectful, I think you are brilliant, sincerely. But I don't think your education or work experience has prepared you for a cover up by these types of people. And I think you may be severely underestimating the education, experience, and wisdom of the monkeys and other coverup believers. Don't let them make a fool of you. We need you.

Thank you Private Eye.

I hope with all my heart that when the crew of the Persistence returns in search of Natalee's remains ... the search will be conducted independently and ... not under the "guidance" of the Aruban police ... Aruban authorities ... Aruban prosecutor or ... an Aruban dive team.  In other words ... I hope the search will exclude the "powers that be" who have been behind the Aruban coverup ... the Aruban coverup that has denied Natalee Holloway justice by distancing Paulus and Joran van der Sloot from implication ... the Aruban coverup that has put a family throught a H--- on Earth for almost three years.

Think about it.  The enemy is not about to assist in furthering a quest to find Natalee's remains ... a guest that does not adhere to the coverup agenda.

IMO

Sincerely, Janet

++++++++++++


Jug Twitty
NANCY GRACE
October 4, 2005


JUG TWITTY: Nancy, what happened -- well, I think it was probably about 30 days after, or so, maybe the 1st of July or something. I had a meeting with Van Der Straaten, who was the police chief in charge at that time. And I went in and sat down with him and told him and Officer Sanboe (ph), who was going to take over for Van Der Straaten. He was there, too.

You know, I asked a question about, I understand that there was a statement made by Joran, where he talks about what he had done to Natalee and he described in very graphic detail, like, the stitching and embroidery and everything on Natalee`s underwear. And he goes, Oh, no, no, no. Absolutely not. Absolutely not. Well, little did he know I had just read the statements where Joran describes that to the "T," you know, two days before. But of course, I didn`t tell him that. But that`s just when I started to think something`s wrong here.

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0510/04/ng.01.html


Beth Twitty
'Scarborough Country'
October 21, 2005


HOLLOWAY TWITTY: They never—they never wanted to implicate these three young men.  They never wanted to implicate them from the beginning. And there is a list of reasons, you know, why we know that is true.

http://msnbc.msn.com/id/9796403/from/RL.2/


Beth Twitty
The Sun
January 29, 2007


Twitty recalled the first days after her daughter's disappearance and the actions of the Aruban government.

"We did everything we could in looking for her.  There was a government coverup, and it has been documented," Twitty contended. "Yet we have remained respectful and have done the right thing."

http://www.jonesborosun.com/story.php?ID=25809


Jug Twitty
'Scarborough Country'
August 11, 2005


TWITTY: ... but when they take my statement 33 days later, and they take the other guys‘ statements that were with me and ladies that were with me, you know, like 19 days later, it‘s like they didn‘t want to find the truth.  

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8925176/


Beth Twitty
'Rita Cosby Live & Direct'
December 5, 2005


TWITTY: ... Remember, within the first 24 hours, we knew who the suspects were. We knew the persons that Natalee were taken from Carlos and Charlie‘s. We knew the license plate of the gray Honda they placed her in. We knew the condition that Natalee was in. We knew the behavior or the conduct in which they engaged in with Natalee.

And then not only that, Jane, within 72 hours, we knew that their first story was totally fabricated, that within the first 72 hours, I faced a room of 12 -- at least 12 detectives, Aruban and Dutch detectives, and a lead detective, Dennis Jacobs (ph), and they knew after we reviewed video footage from the Holiday Inn casino lobby that my daughter had never been brought back to the Holiday Inn. They knew that those suspects were fabricating a story from day one.

<snipped>

TWITTY: Well, Jane, something that the family knew—and we have to keep reminding everyone—after 72 hours -- 72 hours—we knew definitively that these suspects were not telling the truth. We knew that my daughter had never been brought back to the Holiday Inn. Of course we were becoming frustrated. Who wouldn‘t, at this point? You know, we—and what was so unbelievable about this, is they knew this information and still chose to pursue the two security guards on June the 5th.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10348437/


Beth Twitty
DR. PHIL SHOW
January 29, 2006


BETH: There are times when we're thinking that we need to continue, and of course we're still searching for answers, but it's this rollercoaster ride. And it makes me so angry, Dr. Phil, when I let myself fall for information coming out of an official who represents the island of Aruba. If somebody presents you with false hope and false information, it's devastating.

http://www.drphil.com/slideshows/slideshow/3041/?id=1&slide=3&null=null


Dave Holloway
Corruption in Paradise

Page 183

I commented to Jacobs about how short my statement was. He said that I could add anything I wanted to it. Also, I noticed that Eric Soemers's name was on it, but that detective was not even present during the interview. Now I wondered if Jacobs was making up everyone's statement and getting Eric to sign on to them. If that were the case, he could state anything he wanted, and it would look like an official statement made in front of a witness.


Dave Holloway
On the Record w/ Greta
April 11, 2006


HOLLOWAY: Oh, the media was our best friend. If it hadn't been for the media this thing would have been swept under the table the very first day and we'd have been calling back to Aruba "Have you heard anything? Have you heard anything?" I truly believe that.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,191377,00.html


oceanexploration
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #715 1/25 -
« Reply #103 on: January 26, 2008, 12:38:25 PM »


Thought you all may find this interesting if you're willing to accept it-

To date, the Aruban police and dive team has been a tremendous help.  They've honestly done a great job. Over the last month we've established a very good working relationship based on openness and trust.  Most of the relationship success was due to getting the media out of the way and working together shoulder to shoulder over time.  We've helped each other however and whenever we can.  They've treated us with decency and respect and we have treated them as friends and allies, which they are. Most of the police and divers are new since this case started and both eager and careful to do things right.  I wish we had a month ahead of the project just to establish the relationships and trust. I know many of you would likely doubt this view, but it's based on the experiences in the field of the entire search team. I too was extremely worried, paranoid, and suspecting in the beginning.  Now, it's clear we're all working towards a common goal.

I forgot to add that I loved the message from Kyle that it is a requirement to maintain hope. I would give anything to have to eat a great big plate of crow with Kyle watching me choke on it, meaning that the Arubans are sincerely his partner. And I want him to come to his own conclusion. But I really like him, he has definitely proven his worth, and for some dumb reason I feel like he needs my protection, which is a joke. Just keep your guard up Kyle is all I am saying. There have been some very strange happenings in this case.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Observer on March 13, 2008, 09:56:37 PM
Hello :)

I am very humbled and at a loss for words over a few people asking about me and showing there concerns. From the bottom of my heart I thank you! There are so many special people on this forum and I am very proud to be standing along side of you all in this fight for Justice.

Please do not think of me of doing anything wrong or to judge me without knowing the facts first. I know if you were in my shoes you would understand completely. If you have concerns or question me in anyway,please do not hesitate to ask for the truth. Like many of you I have poured my heart and soul into helping and I would never do anything that wasn't in Natalee's best interest's. Everyone has a breaking point and I reached mine,I am the type of person where we do it with 100% honesty or I don't do it at all. I needed to take a break for a few days and I truly appreciate the support given to me from people that know me.

I became interested in helping Natalee and her Family on June 2nd 2005,I have used the name ******* in every post that I have ever made and I have never ever lied about anything. I hope you all know that.

Thank you,

*******


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: texasmom on March 13, 2008, 10:01:01 PM

 ::MonkeyHaHa::  a girl can never have too many sista's it's true!!!!  :smt052


I've got 2 daughters and the youngest one might dispute that:)
PI, As the oldest of four girls (with one bathroom!) growing up, it wasn't pretty...constant drama......I thought my momma was CRAZY to have had so many kids...I would NEVER have kids!!!!  Now that I'm grown, I'm so thankful to have my sisters....they all live in Mississippi...but we are all close.  If I needed them, they would load up and hit I-20 in a moments notice, same for me if they need me.  I have two sons and I know what you're talking about, but I remind them all the time how thankful they will be to have each other one day! 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: bluwaters on March 13, 2008, 10:01:01 PM
Hello :)

I am very humbled and at a loss for words over a few people asking about me and showing there concerns. From the bottom of my heart I thank you! There are so many special people on this forum and I am very proud to be standing along side of you all in this fight for Justice.

Please do not think of me of doing anything wrong or to judge me without knowing the facts first. I know if you were in my shoes you would understand completely. If you have concerns or question me in anyway,please do not hesitate to ask for the truth. Like many of you I have poured my heart and soul into helping and I would never do anything that wasn't in Natalee's best interest's. Everyone has a breaking point and I reached mine,I am the type of person where we do it with 100% honesty or I don't do it at all. I needed to take a break for a few days and I truly appreciate the support given to me from people that know me.

I became interested in helping Natalee and her Family on June 2nd 2005,I have used the name ******* in every post and I have ever made and I have never ever lied about anything. I hope you all know that.

Thank you,

*******
Yay! ******* - thanks for the post!!! (http://i92.photobucket.com/albums/l28/TallyAnna/smilies/multistars.gif)
I don't really have a clue what the trouble is about, but you are needed here! Everyone deserves a break, so do what you need to do for yourself. Just make sure you come back home!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Blue Moon on March 13, 2008, 10:01:27 PM
Hello :)

I am very humbled and at a loss for words over a few people asking about me and showing there concerns. From the bottom of my heart I thank you! There are so many special people on this forum and I am very proud to be standing along side of you all in this fight for Justice.

Please do not think of me of doing anything wrong or to judge me without knowing the facts first. I know if you were in my shoes you would understand completely. If you have concerns or question me in anyway,please do not hesitate to ask for the truth. Like many of you I have poured my heart and soul into helping and I would never do anything that wasn't in Natalee's best interest's. Everyone has a breaking point and I reached mine,I am the type of person where we do it with 100% honesty or I don't do it at all. I needed to take a break for a few days and I truly appreciate the support given to me from people that know me.

I became interested in helping Natalee and her Family on June 2nd 2005,I have used the name ******* in every post that I have ever made and I have never ever lied about anything. I hope you all know that.

Thank you,

*******

Now, get back here. ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Kermit on March 13, 2008, 10:02:13 PM
Hello :)

I am very humbled and at a loss for words over a few people asking about me and showing there concerns. From the bottom of my heart I thank you! There are so many special people on this forum and I am very proud to be standing along side of you all in this fight for Justice.

Please do not think of me of doing anything wrong or to judge me without knowing the facts first. I know if you were in my shoes you would understand completely. If you have concerns or question me in anyway,please do not hesitate to ask for the truth. Like many of you I have poured my heart and soul into helping and I would never do anything that wasn't in Natalee's best interest's. Everyone has a breaking point and I reached mine,I am the type of person where we do it with 100% honesty or I don't do it at all. I needed to take a break for a few days and I truly appreciate the support given to me from people that know me.

I became interested in helping Natalee and her Family on June 2nd 2005,I have used the name ******* in every post that I have ever made and I have never ever lied about anything. I hope you all know that.

Thank you,

*******

ribbit

Hang in there.
Don't ever change.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 13, 2008, 10:02:19 PM
******* - good to see you back!

Had a small problem today.  I approved some new members and one happened to be a well known Dutch troll.  oops, lol  ::MonkeyHaHa::

They were posting in this thread  - page 9 and 10:

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2669.0


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Kermit on March 13, 2008, 10:05:03 PM
Hey Destiny,

It is driving me nuts trying to figure out where you are.
I live in GA. I have asked Klaas to forward my email addy to you. We may be neighbors.  ::MonkeyHaHa::

I've been to GA does that count?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: private eye on March 13, 2008, 10:06:13 PM
Hello :)

I am very humbled and at a loss for words over a few people asking about me and showing there concerns. From the bottom of my heart I thank you! There are so many special people on this forum and I am very proud to be standing along side of you all in this fight for Justice.

Please do not think of me of doing anything wrong or to judge me without knowing the facts first. I know if you were in my shoes you would understand completely. If you have concerns or question me in anyway,please do not hesitate to ask for the truth. Like many of you I have poured my heart and soul into helping and I would never do anything that wasn't in Natalee's best interest's. Everyone has a breaking point and I reached mine,I am the type of person where we do it with 100% honesty or I don't do it at all. I needed to take a break for a few days and I truly appreciate the support given to me from people that know me.

I became interested in helping Natalee and her Family on June 2nd 2005,I have used the name ******* in every post that I have ever made and I have never ever lied about anything. I hope you all know that.

Thank you,

*******

Now, get back here. ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::

*******, there is no need to take days what you can accomplish by just saying oh fock it, and start back like nothing happened:) Nobody knows what you mean when you talk about wanting people to trust you because they already do and always have:)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 13, 2008, 10:07:35 PM
Posted by Kyle at BFN when someone posted about Psychics:

I hope you don't find this deflating.  Many of you probably won't want to hear this, but it's what we've observed in the field. 
The Aruban police had on file a 9" thick stack of psychic "revelations" ranging from the absolutely absurd to the plausible, to the down right convincing.  These statements came from literally hundreds of opportunist psychics from around the world coming out of woodwork.  The only thing all each of these statements had in common is that they all had remarkable inconsistencies in them which made them provably bogus based on case information not made public.  In short, I believe some people are truly gifted with fantastic imaginations and passions but we as humans are not made to know the future. If a psychic nailed every detail of this case retrospectively, they should be arrested for their involvement. The statements which were very convincing could be replicated based on a solid handle on the publicly available case information with gaps imaginatively filled in.  The problem in putting too much faith in these people is that it inevitably leads to wasting a lot of time and resources and will frustrate the team tremendously.  While in the field, we received literally hundreds of leads from psychics who knew with "absolute certainty" where Natalee's body was.  The danger in a case like this is losing hope.  When we lose hope, we cling on to anything we've got.  This makes us very susceptible to being deceived.  We want to believe someone has the answers and is capable of handing those answers over to us on a silver platter.  The problem is this just isn't reality.  It never will be.  It's a cruel realization but the sooner it's accepted the faster one can sort through the deception to find the answers based on evidence which will hold up in court.

Unfortunately, those trusted with the evidence of the investigation were not good stewards of the evidence. Evidence has been destroyed, search activities delayed with no site protection accomplished by the authorities, and interrogations have been stopped at key points and the person being interrogated allowed to be counseled by parents and attorneys, and interrogations have been stopped just short of key questions being asked when the flow of good information was beginning to come out.

Prisoners being isolated have been furnished cell phones and communication has been allowed to occur between locked up and the free.

Do I think psychics are the answer? No.

But sharing information with people who work for people who are directly orchestrating the cover up, Rudy, or the Dutch, is the most irresponsible investigating I can imagine. What kills this investigation is people having to come into it, wanting to apply basic investigatory protocols into place, and then having those channels sabotage the new evidence that the new players discover. Of course, as is happened everytime in this case, the new people eventually come to a point where the manipulation of the evidence is undeniable, but by then the fruits of their work are gone, and there is simply another member of the believers of the cover up group. What I pray that Kyle and the crew of the Persistence will determine, is that  regardless of how hard working the man that they are working with appears to work, his work belongs to Rudy, and Rudy belongs to the local dutch.  

We are not hysterical, ignorant, paranoid people. We have seen the cover up in action, in broad daylight, with impunity, and if you disregard our warnings, you will become the next chump in a series of chumps, no matter how sophisticated your equipment, the level of your educational achievement, or the extent of your job skills and work history.


PI ... those who are on a quest for the truth regarding what happened to Natalee Holloway should read Dave Holloway's book "Corruption in Paradise" and Beth Holloway's book "Loving Natalee" prior to being deceived that "Aruban authories" are about to assist them in their quest.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Kermit on March 13, 2008, 10:08:20 PM
Quick question...has any Monkey located where Urine *really* is?

Nope.  We have heard Germany or a mental institution in Urecht.

(http://img228.imageshack.us/img228/5191/jpeekar2.jpg)

Joran is in his own prison



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 13, 2008, 10:08:26 PM
Hey Destiny,

It is driving me nuts trying to figure out where you are.
I live in GA. I have asked Klaas to forward my email addy to you. We may be neighbors.  ::MonkeyHaHa::

I've been to GA does that count?


I've been to GA 3 times, does that count  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: hotping on March 13, 2008, 10:08:47 PM
WELCOME BACK *******! WE MISSED YA!  ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

And Truly I Do Stand with You!  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: private eye on March 13, 2008, 10:08:58 PM

 ::MonkeyHaHa::  a girl can never have too many sista's it's true!!!!  :smt052


I've got 2 daughters and the youngest one might dispute that:)
PI, As the oldest of four girls (with one bathroom!) growing up, it wasn't pretty...constant drama......I thought my momma was CRAZY to have had so many kids...I would NEVER have kids!!!!  Now that I'm grown, I'm so thankful to have my sisters....they all live in Mississippi...but we are all close.  If I needed them, they would load up and hit I-20 in a moments notice, same for me if they need me.  I have two sons and I know what you're talking about, but I remind them all the time how thankful they will be to have each other one day! 

My oldest is either real mean or my youngest real wimpy:) They are in their early 20's:)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Observer on March 13, 2008, 10:09:03 PM
******* - good to see you back!

Had a small problem today.  I approved some new members and one happened to be a well known Dutch troll.  oops, lol  ::MonkeyHaHa::

They were posting in this thread  - page 9 and 10:

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2669.0

Thanks! I just wanted to agree with the last few posts about Klaas..She is a very special lady who I admire a great deal!

Johan,Katrien and Flipper know the Dutch Trolls pretty well  ::MonkeyWink:: Caesu does as well but he is quite the politician and deals with them in a unique way  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on March 13, 2008, 10:09:14 PM
******* - good to see you back!

Had a small problem today.  I approved some new members and one happened to be a well known Dutch troll.  oops, lol  ::MonkeyHaHa::

They were posting in this thread  - page 9 and 10:

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2669.0

LOL@ Dutch Troll, lol.
Welcome back *******, we need you.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Kermit on March 13, 2008, 10:09:34 PM
Hello :)

I am very humbled and at a loss for words over a few people asking about me and showing there concerns. From the bottom of my heart I thank you! There are so many special people on this forum and I am very proud to be standing along side of you all in this fight for Justice.

Please do not think of me of doing anything wrong or to judge me without knowing the facts first. I know if you were in my shoes you would understand completely. If you have concerns or question me in anyway,please do not hesitate to ask for the truth. Like many of you I have poured my heart and soul into helping and I would never do anything that wasn't in Natalee's best interest's. Everyone has a breaking point and I reached mine,I am the type of person where we do it with 100% honesty or I don't do it at all. I needed to take a break for a few days and I truly appreciate the support given to me from people that know me.

I became interested in helping Natalee and her Family on June 2nd 2005,I have used the name ******* in every post that I have ever made and I have never ever lied about anything. I hope you all know that.

Thank you,

*******

Now, get back here. ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::

*******, there is no need to take days what you can accomplish by just saying oh fock it, and start back like nothing happened:) Nobody knows what you mean when you talk about wanting people to trust you because they already do and always have:)


potty mouth

ribbit



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: vms on March 13, 2008, 10:09:46 PM
Hello :)

I am very humbled and at a loss for words over a few people asking about me and showing there concerns. From the bottom of my heart I thank you! There are so many special people on this forum and I am very proud to be standing along side of you all in this fight for Justice.

Please do not think of me of doing anything wrong or to judge me without knowing the facts first. I know if you were in my shoes you would understand completely. If you have concerns or question me in anyway,please do not hesitate to ask for the truth. Like many of you I have poured my heart and soul into helping and I would never do anything that wasn't in Natalee's best interest's. Everyone has a breaking point and I reached mine,I am the type of person where we do it with 100% honesty or I don't do it at all. I needed to take a break for a few days and I truly appreciate the support given to me from people that know me.

I became interested in helping Natalee and her Family on June 2nd 2005,I have used the name ******* in every post that I have ever made and I have never ever lied about anything. I hope you all know that.

Thank you,

*******

Now, get back here. ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::

Ditto!  ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 13, 2008, 10:10:53 PM
Hello :)

I am very humbled and at a loss for words over a few people asking about me and showing there concerns. From the bottom of my heart I thank you! There are so many special people on this forum and I am very proud to be standing along side of you all in this fight for Justice.

Please do not think of me of doing anything wrong or to judge me without knowing the facts first. I know if you were in my shoes you would understand completely. If you have concerns or question me in anyway,please do not hesitate to ask for the truth. Like many of you I have poured my heart and soul into helping and I would never do anything that wasn't in Natalee's best interest's. Everyone has a breaking point and I reached mine,I am the type of person where we do it with 100% honesty or I don't do it at all. I needed to take a break for a few days and I truly appreciate the support given to me from people that know me.

I became interested in helping Natalee and her Family on June 2nd 2005,I have used the name ******* in every post that I have ever made and I have never ever lied about anything. I hope you all know that.

Thank you,

*******

******* ... we know your heart and ... it is good.

 ::MonkeyCool::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: private eye on March 13, 2008, 10:12:56 PM
Posted by Kyle at BFN when someone posted about Psychics:

I hope you don't find this deflating.  Many of you probably won't want to hear this, but it's what we've observed in the field. 
The Aruban police had on file a 9" thick stack of psychic "revelations" ranging from the absolutely absurd to the plausible, to the down right convincing.  These statements came from literally hundreds of opportunist psychics from around the world coming out of woodwork.  The only thing all each of these statements had in common is that they all had remarkable inconsistencies in them which made them provably bogus based on case information not made public.  In short, I believe some people are truly gifted with fantastic imaginations and passions but we as humans are not made to know the future. If a psychic nailed every detail of this case retrospectively, they should be arrested for their involvement. The statements which were very convincing could be replicated based on a solid handle on the publicly available case information with gaps imaginatively filled in.  The problem in putting too much faith in these people is that it inevitably leads to wasting a lot of time and resources and will frustrate the team tremendously.  While in the field, we received literally hundreds of leads from psychics who knew with "absolute certainty" where Natalee's body was.  The danger in a case like this is losing hope.  When we lose hope, we cling on to anything we've got.  This makes us very susceptible to being deceived.  We want to believe someone has the answers and is capable of handing those answers over to us on a silver platter.  The problem is this just isn't reality.  It never will be.  It's a cruel realization but the sooner it's accepted the faster one can sort through the deception to find the answers based on evidence which will hold up in court.

Unfortunately, those trusted with the evidence of the investigation were not good stewards of the evidence. Evidence has been destroyed, search activities delayed with no site protection accomplished by the authorities, and interrogations have been stopped at key points and the person being interrogated allowed to be counseled by parents and attorneys, and interrogations have been stopped just short of key questions being asked when the flow of good information was beginning to come out.

Prisoners being isolated have been furnished cell phones and communication has been allowed to occur between locked up and the free.

Do I think psychics are the answer? No.

But sharing information with people who work for people who are directly orchestrating the cover up, Rudy, or the Dutch, is the most irresponsible investigating I can imagine. What kills this investigation is people having to come into it, wanting to apply basic investigatory protocols into place, and then having those channels sabotage the new evidence that the new players discover. Of course, as is happened everytime in this case, the new people eventually come to a point where the manipulation of the evidence is undeniable, but by then the fruits of their work are gone, and there is simply another member of the believers of the cover up group. What I pray that Kyle and the crew of the Persistence will determine, is that  regardless of how hard working the man that they are working with appears to work, his work belongs to Rudy, and Rudy belongs to the local dutch.  

We are not hysterical, ignorant, paranoid people. We have seen the cover up in action, in broad daylight, with impunity, and if you disregard our warnings, you will become the next chump in a series of chumps, no matter how sophisticated your equipment, the level of your educational achievement, or the extent of your job skills and work history.


PI ... those who are on a quest for the truth regarding what happened to Natalee Holloway should read Dave Holloway's book "Corruption in Paradise" and Beth Holloway's book "Loving Natalee" prior to being deceived that "Aruban authories" are about to assist them in their quest.

Janet

Kyle has a great attitude, disposition, and optimism about him that makes him extremely likeable and most likely a lot of fun to work with. He also is really bright, and if something is fishy, they might fool him once but I bet they don't the second time. He also seems like just a good guy, and good guys at his age haven't hung out with a lot of shady characters:)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Kermit on March 13, 2008, 10:13:19 PM
Hey Destiny,

It is driving me nuts trying to figure out where you are.
I live in GA. I have asked Klaas to forward my email addy to you. We may be neighbors.  ::MonkeyHaHa::

I've been to GA does that count?


I've been to GA 3 times, does that count  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Three beats my one.

Got any pictures?





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: private eye on March 13, 2008, 10:14:36 PM
I'll be back. I need to stop and have a couple of drinks:) The sec tournament is on:)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Kermit on March 13, 2008, 10:17:12 PM
(http://img228.imageshack.us/img228/5191/jpeekar2.jpg)

I heard even Joran WAS LOOKING FOR *******/b]


Don't worry big guy we got ya covered.
 ::MonkeyLaugh::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 13, 2008, 10:17:49 PM
Hey Destiny,

It is driving me nuts trying to figure out where you are.
I live in GA. I have asked Klaas to forward my email addy to you. We may be neighbors.  ::MonkeyHaHa::

I've been to GA does that count?


I've been to GA 3 times, does that count  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Three beats my one.

Got any pictures?





Yes but mostly with me in them and from many years ago.  One was from 1969 when I went to go visit my then boyfriend in boot camp.

One time was on business - no pictures

The last time was when my son was in boot camp but that was about 12 years ago now  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: private eye on March 13, 2008, 10:18:16 PM
Hello :)

I am very humbled and at a loss for words over a few people asking about me and showing there concerns. From the bottom of my heart I thank you! There are so many special people on this forum and I am very proud to be standing along side of you all in this fight for Justice.

Please do not think of me of doing anything wrong or to judge me without knowing the facts first. I know if you were in my shoes you would understand completely. If you have concerns or question me in anyway,please do not hesitate to ask for the truth. Like many of you I have poured my heart and soul into helping and I would never do anything that wasn't in Natalee's best interest's. Everyone has a breaking point and I reached mine,I am the type of person where we do it with 100% honesty or I don't do it at all. I needed to take a break for a few days and I truly appreciate the support given to me from people that know me.

I became interested in helping Natalee and her Family on June 2nd 2005,I have used the name ******* in every post that I have ever made and I have never ever lied about anything. I hope you all know that.

Thank you,

*******

Now, get back here. ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::

*******, there is no need to take days what you can accomplish by just saying oh fock it, and start back like nothing happened:) Nobody knows what you mean when you talk about wanting people to trust you because they already do and always have:)


potty mouth

ribbit



I was just trying to speed up his down time:)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: vms on March 13, 2008, 10:19:03 PM
Hey Destiny,

It is driving me nuts trying to figure out where you are.
I live in GA. I have asked Klaas to forward my email addy to you. We may be neighbors.  ::MonkeyHaHa::

I've been to GA does that count?


Yes! You are now an Honorary Georgia Frog!

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/frog.jpg)

Klaas, you now have citizenship. :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: kkate on March 13, 2008, 10:24:04 PM
Glad to see you *******.....Cheers


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Observer on March 13, 2008, 10:25:18 PM
Thanks everyone! Friendships and support mean a great deal to me and I am truly thankful! It is very humbling..

Anything I missed the last few days?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: texasmom on March 13, 2008, 10:26:05 PM
Hello :)

I am very humbled and at a loss for words over a few people asking about me and showing there concerns. From the bottom of my heart I thank you! There are so many special people on this forum and I am very proud to be standing along side of you all in this fight for Justice.

Please do not think of me of doing anything wrong or to judge me without knowing the facts first. I know if you were in my shoes you would understand completely. If you have concerns or question me in anyway,please do not hesitate to ask for the truth. Like many of you I have poured my heart and soul into helping and I would never do anything that wasn't in Natalee's best interest's. Everyone has a breaking point and I reached mine,I am the type of person where we do it with 100% honesty or I don't do it at all. I needed to take a break for a few days and I truly appreciate the support given to me from people that know me.

I became interested in helping Natalee and her Family on June 2nd 2005,I have used the name ******* in every post that I have ever made and I have never ever lied about anything. I hope you all know that.

Thank you,

*******

******* ... we know your heart and ... it is good.
 ::MonkeyCool::

Janet
So very true!  I'm delighted to see you back, *******!  ::MonkeyDance::

I also agree with Kermit, Don't ever change!  ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Blue Moon on March 13, 2008, 10:29:48 PM
OMG, Iron Butterfly is on now. The lead singer is wearing a wig, in fact most of them are. No way men their age is sporting their own hair ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: SS on March 13, 2008, 10:32:43 PM
I've been following all of you for a very long time.  I was approved today, and I'm not the Troll from pages 9 and 10.  I'm very happy to be here. ::MonkeyWink::  I'm glad that ******* didn't go away.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: texasmom on March 13, 2008, 10:35:25 PM
I've been following all of you for a very long time.  I was approved today, and I'm not the Troll from pages 9 and 10.  I'm very happy to be here. ::MonkeyWink::  I'm glad that ******* didn't go away.

Welcome SS!   ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 13, 2008, 10:36:59 PM
I've been following all of you for a very long time.  I was approved today, and I'm not the Troll from pages 9 and 10.  I'm very happy to be here. ::MonkeyWink::  I'm glad that ******* didn't go away.

OMG how funny, poor thing!  NO, this is not the troll!  SS has been a long time front page poster  ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::

Welcome to the forum SS  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: bleachedblack on March 13, 2008, 10:39:14 PM
OT but wanted to post.......... ::MonkeyNoNo::

++++++++++++++++++++

BREAKING NEWS: Body found in GHT could be missing Grand Rapids woman


Thu, Mar 13, 2008
GRAND HAVEN TOWNSHIP — A body was found late this morning that investigators believe could be that of a Grand Rapids woman missing since early December 2007.

The body, identified as female, was found about one quarter mile south off Pierce Street on wooded property just east of a home at 16160 Pierce St., near 160th Avenue. A surveyor discovered the body around 11:30 this morning on the property, recently purchased by Reenders Blueberry Farm.

The Ottawa County Sheriff's Department is not saying whether the body is that of Janna Kelly, 60, who was last seen Dec. 4.

However, Lt. Mark Bennett said the Kelly family has been contacted and the Grand Rapids Police Department was on scene during the Sheriff's Department's investigation.

The body was taken to Spectrum Blodgett Hospital in Grand Rapids, where an autopsy is scheduled Friday morning. Bennett said the autopsy should help determine a cause of death and how long the body may have been decomposing.

Bennett did not expect a positive identification to be made right away. He declined to comment on the details of the scene, pending further investigation.

Kelly was reported missing Dec. 5 after failing to show up for work at the Burr Insurance Agency in Grand Rapids.

On Dec. 13, 2007, police searched Olive Township , about 10 miles south of where today's discovery was made. Grand Rapids Police Capt. Curt VanderKooi previously declined to comment on how investigators were led to Olive Township.

Thirty-five officers and volunteers from the Grand Rapids Police Department, Ottawa County Sheriff's Department and a search-and-rescue team combed an area near 136th Avenue and New Holland Street from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. Dec. 13. A helicopter and K-9 units also took part in the search, which failed to yield any clues.

Kelly's car was found the day after she was reported missing in the Ottawa Hills neighborhood near Plymouth Avenue and Louise Street in Grand Rapids, police said. Her purse and wallet were found about a mile away from her home.

http://www.grandhaventribune.com/paid/291213772991966.bsp


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Observer on March 13, 2008, 10:40:20 PM
I've been following all of you for a very long time.  I was approved today, and I'm not the Troll from pages 9 and 10.  I'm very happy to be here. ::MonkeyWink::  I'm glad that ******* didn't go away.

I also lurked for a long time,it almost felt like I was eavesdropping  ::MonkeyHaHa::
Glad to have you here SS! What do you think happened to Natalee?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: SS on March 13, 2008, 10:48:05 PM
I've been following all of you for a very long time.  I was approved today, and I'm not the Troll from pages 9 and 10.  I'm very happy to be here. ::MonkeyWink::  I'm glad that ******* didn't go away.

I also lurked for a long time,it almost felt like I was eavesdropping  ::MonkeyHaHa::
Glad to have you here SS! What do you think happened to Natalee?


Thanks *******, Urine and Paulass did her wrong and we need to fix that situation.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: hotping on March 13, 2008, 10:49:12 PM
I've been following all of you for a very long time.  I was approved today, and I'm not the Troll from pages 9 and 10.  I'm very happy to be here. ::MonkeyWink::  I'm glad that ******* didn't go away.
Welcome SS!  ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Magnolia on March 13, 2008, 10:50:48 PM
Hot Diggidy Dog!  Our ******* has come home. ::MonkeyDance::

The cage was might empty without you, *******.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: SS on March 13, 2008, 10:51:17 PM
I've been following all of you for a very long time.  I was approved today, and I'm not the Troll from pages 9 and 10.  I'm very happy to be here. ::MonkeyWink::  I'm glad that ******* didn't go away.

OMG how funny, poor thing!  NO, this is not the troll!  SS has been a long time front page poster  ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::

Welcome to the forum SS  ::MonkeyWink::


I absolutely couldn't resist jumping in at this moment ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Kat_Gram on March 13, 2008, 10:51:48 PM
I am glad to see ******* back. Don't know what the story is. Don't much want to know either, just glad that you are back ! Taking a break is a good thing. Keep up the good work.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 13, 2008, 11:06:51 PM
******* - did you see Patrick's website?

http://patrickvandereem.nl/

(http://criminal.prodgprojects.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/movel-ad_layout_01-half.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Observer on March 13, 2008, 11:07:05 PM
I am glad to see ******* back. Don't know what the story is. Don't much want to know either, just glad that you are back ! Taking a break is a good thing. Keep up the good work.

Thanks again everyone! I am really at a loss for words and blown away! It is a great feeling that people see the good in me as I see the same in them! All this attention is a bit suprising but very much appreciated!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Blue Moon on March 13, 2008, 11:11:27 PM
I am glad to see ******* back. Don't know what the story is. Don't much want to know either, just glad that you are back ! Taking a break is a good thing. Keep up the good work.

Thanks again everyone! I am really at a loss for words and blown away! It is a great feeling that people see the good in me as I see the same in them! All this attention is a bit suprising but very much appreciated!

I'm calling it a night. But glad you are back and "We Stand With the Girl" always.
bluemoon


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 13, 2008, 11:11:30 PM
Thanks everyone! Friendships and support mean a great deal to me and I am truly thankful! It is very humbling..

Anything I missed the last few days?

******* ... you have proven your dedication to the cause of justice for Natalee Holloway over and over again in both your words and actions.  You are worthy of being upheld.

Good Night Monkeys and ... have a good weekend.  I will be away for a few days.

 ::MonkeyCool::

Janet
8:10 PM


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Observer on March 13, 2008, 11:11:43 PM
******* - did you see Patrick's website?

http://patrickvandereem.nl/


Nope not yet! I'll have to check it out..Thanks!  ::MonkeyCool::

I am also seeing this bit of unrest in Aruba? Look's like quite a few civil workers want a raise in Aruba? I actually thought it was a parade or something at first but it's not  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Observer on March 13, 2008, 11:16:08 PM
Thanks everyone! Friendships and support mean a great deal to me and I am truly thankful! It is very humbling..

Anything I missed the last few days?

******* ... you have proven your dedication to the cause of justice for Natalee Holloway over and over again in both your words and actions.  You are worthy of being upheld.

Good Night Monkeys and ... have a good weekend.  I will be away for a few days.

 ::MonkeyCool::

Janet
8:10 PM

Night BMOK and Janet!

We will miss you Janet! You are a very special person,not only do we share the same interests but also the same ancestry  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 13, 2008, 11:16:27 PM
http://www.prive.nl/evert/

Translation from the tabloid magazine (posted by Debbie at BFN):

Employer institute confirms: This is where Joran is!

The past weeks no one has seen him anymore. He would be in an institute but that was denied by his family. Even though "Privé" found out that Joran for sure is staying in the forest of Utrecht, hidden behind a high fence.

His father denied all he could, but that is a good habit for the van der Sloot family. Even though Joran, to whom everyone points in the Natalee Holloway case, for sure is institutionalized.

That explains why of the 7 million people who watched the sensational broadcasting of Peter de Vries on February 3, no one has seen him publicly since.

An employer of the Willem Arntzhoeve in Den Dolder, Utrecht: "Yes, he is staying with us. Kept away from the outside world and almost no one is in contact with him".

Kept away from the outside world, behind the high fence's and in between countless trees Joran again is the center of a big investigation. This time not by police or justice or reporters, but by well educated psychiatrists who try to find out which behavior disorders make Joran the young men he is.

The treatment is happening with a lot of secrecy, no one besides the Privé source wants to confirm that Joran indeed is committed in this institution that has a very good reputation.

In the center 24 people are being hospitalized, in the age ranging from 18-60. At the Roosenberg department there are people with behavior problems in combination with an addiction.

There are two units. At one one can commit themselves when there is a need for it, at the other one enters because a court follows up on the advise of the forensic psychiatric unit.

It cannot be anything other then that Joran, after the broadcast voluntarily has presented himself at help institutions.

Probably the police in Rotterdam, where he was questioned shortly after the broadcast, has pointed out that option to him.  Joran would have realised the necessity of undergoing profound psychiatric treatment/investigation.

For the police him being committed meant rest. The groups of people who gathered at Drachten after a channel had reported that Joran was staying in an apartment there, promised no good. Such a "volksgericht" could have taken place any moment at any place, could have repeated itself when the real Joran had showed his face somewhere.

The moods in the country were out of control after the broadcast.

Some satisfaction for Natalee's mother Beth Holloway must be that Joran's current home is very similar to a prison cell.

Documentation of the Willem Arntzhoeve shows that the rooms of the patients are not bigger then 2,5 by 3,5 meters, and contains no more then a bed, a chair, a small locker and a shelve that can be used as a table.

The commitment would be for a period of 1 or 2 years. Unless of course on Aruba new indications are discovered that would lead to Joran changing his Dutch "cell" for an Aruban one.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 13, 2008, 11:17:20 PM
Thanks everyone! Friendships and support mean a great deal to me and I am truly thankful! It is very humbling..

Anything I missed the last few days?

******* ... you have proven your dedication to the cause of justice for Natalee Holloway over and over again in both your words and actions.  You are worthy of being upheld.

Good Night Monkeys and ... have a good weekend.  I will be away for a few days.

 ::MonkeyCool::

Janet
8:10 PM

Nite Janet - hope you are going to be away having some fun!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 13, 2008, 11:17:57 PM
Nite BlueMoon


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: SS on March 13, 2008, 11:20:32 PM
I have a question and I'd like to know what the rest of you think.  I am about 75% of the way through the Andrew Hodges book, Into the Deep, and my brain is starting to feel like Swiss cheese.  Do any of you understand how this man deciphers the statements? Everytime that I think I'm starting to get a clue, he seems to go off in another direction.  I agree with a lot of his theories, I just don't  comprehend his process and new rules seem to be added with every sentence that he deciphers.  Is it just me???  ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: texasmom on March 13, 2008, 11:22:51 PM
Thanks everyone! Friendships and support mean a great deal to me and I am truly thankful! It is very humbling..

Anything I missed the last few days?

******* ... you have proven your dedication to the cause of justice for Natalee Holloway over and over again in both your words and actions.  You are worthy of being upheld.

Good Night Monkeys and ... have a good weekend.  I will be away for a few days.

 ::MonkeyCool::

Janet
8:10 PM
Goodnight Janet! Have a safe trip!  and hurry back! ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Destiny on March 13, 2008, 11:27:56 PM
Hey Destiny,

It is driving me nuts trying to figure out where you are.
I live in GA. I have asked Klaas to forward my email addy to you. We may be neighbors.  ::MonkeyHaHa::

I've been to GA does that count?


I've been to GA 3 times, does that count  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Well Dang Klaas...that makes you and honorary *BUBBETTE*...LOL!...the dudes are bubbas...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: dennisintn on March 13, 2008, 11:29:29 PM
OMG, Iron Butterfly is on now. The lead singer is wearing a wig, in fact most of them are. No way men their age is sporting their own hair ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::

smartass, i resemble that.  a lot.
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: texasmom on March 13, 2008, 11:31:39 PM
Hey Destiny,

It is driving me nuts trying to figure out where you are.
I live in GA. I have asked Klaas to forward my email addy to you. We may be neighbors.  ::MonkeyHaHa::

I've been to GA does that count?


I've been to GA 3 times, does that count  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Well Dang Klaas...that makes you and honorary *BUBBETTE*...LOL!...the dudes are bubbas...
::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Dihannah1 on March 13, 2008, 11:33:47 PM
******* - did you see Patrick's website?

http://patrickvandereem.nl/

(http://criminal.prodgprojects.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/movel-ad_layout_01-half.jpg)

Welcome back *******!   Now we just need to get Anna back and build a  bridge over the water!

Ok, Klaas, I am confused.  Earlier you and some Dutchies were posting translations from Patricks blog and now this one is in English? Is it new?   I tried clicking on his email to send an Invite to SM, but didn't work.  Guess I'll need to leave comments...   Monkeys,  help me try and get Patrick to come post at SM!!!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: hotping on March 13, 2008, 11:34:10 PM
http://www.prive.nl/evert/

Translation from the tabloid magazine (posted by Debbie at BFN):

Employer institute confirms: This is where Joran is!

The past weeks no one has seen him anymore. He would be in an institute but that was denied by his family. Even though "Privé" found out that Joran for sure is staying in the forest of Utrecht, hidden behind a high fence.

His father denied all he could, but that is a good habit for the van der Sloot family. Even though Joran, to whom everyone points in the Natalee Holloway case, for sure is institutionalized.

That explains why of the 7 million people who watched the sensational broadcasting of Peter de Vries on February 3, no one has seen him publicly since.

An employer of the Willem Arntzhoeve in Den Dolder, Utrecht: "Yes, he is staying with us. Kept away from the outside world and almost no one is in contact with him".

Kept away from the outside world, behind the high fence's and in between countless trees Joran again is the center of a big investigation. This time not by police or justice or reporters, but by well educated psychiatrists who try to find out which behavior disorders make Joran the young men he is.

The treatment is happening with a lot of secrecy, no one besides the Privé source wants to confirm that Joran indeed is committed in this institution that has a very good reputation.

In the center 24 people are being hospitalized, in the age ranging from 18-60. At the Roosenberg department there are people with behavior problems in combination with an addiction.

There are two units. At one one can commit themselves when there is a need for it, at the other one enters because a court follows up on the advise of the forensic psychiatric unit.

It cannot be anything other then that Joran, after the broadcast voluntarily has presented himself at help institutions.

Probably the police in Rotterdam, where he was questioned shortly after the broadcast, has pointed out that option to him.  Joran would have realised the necessity of undergoing profound psychiatric treatment/investigation.

For the police him being committed meant rest. The groups of people who gathered at Drachten after a channel had reported that Joran was staying in an apartment there, promised no good. Such a "volksgericht" could have taken place any moment at any place, could have repeated itself when the real Joran had showed his face somewhere.

The moods in the country were out of control after the broadcast.

Some satisfaction for Natalee's mother Beth Holloway must be that Joran's current home is very similar to a prison cell.

Documentation of the Willem Arntzhoeve shows that the rooms of the patients are not bigger then 2,5 by 3,5 meters, and contains no more then a bed, a chair, a small locker and a shelve that can be used as a table.

The commitment would be for a period of 1 or 2 years. Unless of course on Aruba new indications are discovered that would lead to Joran changing his Dutch "cell" for an Aruban one.



Oh Only if it were true....but If it is He probably has a cellphone and a laptop and all the porn he wants....Yep!  ::MonkeyEek::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: texasmom on March 13, 2008, 11:34:52 PM
OMG, Iron Butterfly is on now. The lead singer is wearing a wig, in fact most of them are. No way men their age is sporting their own hair ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::

smartass, i resemble that.  a lot.
dennisintn
::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: hotping on March 13, 2008, 11:36:17 PM
Hey Destiny,

It is driving me nuts trying to figure out where you are.
I live in GA. I have asked Klaas to forward my email addy to you. We may be neighbors.  ::MonkeyHaHa::

I've been to GA does that count?


I've been to GA 3 times, does that count  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Well Dang Klaas...that makes you and honorary *BUBBETTE*...LOL!...the dudes are bubbas...
Well Heck I've never been to GA...I feel left out...LOL  ::MonkeyWaa:: ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Destiny on March 13, 2008, 11:36:24 PM
Thanks everyone! Friendships and support mean a great deal to me and I am truly thankful! It is very humbling..

Anything I missed the last few days?

Oh...You will have to work your *widdle* arse off to catch up Bubba...((((((((((((((((*******))))))))))))))))))    Wubs Ja...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Observer on March 13, 2008, 11:36:37 PM
I have a question and I'd like to know what the rest of you think.  I am about 75% of the way through the Andrew Hodges book, Into the Deep, and my brain is starting to feel like Swiss cheese.  Do any of you understand how this man deciphers the statements? Everytime that I think I'm starting to get a clue, he seems to go off in another direction.  I agree with a lot of his theories, I just don't  comprehend his process and new rules seem to be added with every sentence that he deciphers.  Is it just me???  ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyConfused::

 ::MonkeyLaugh:: Can't help you SS as I haven't read his book yet! He certainly analyzes Deepak's emails like no one else :) Much of what he says I agree with but I don't think Natalee was given XTC as that wouldn't make her unconscious. I also think there are some deceptions and parts of this case that the good Dr is not aware of to draw a final conclusion. He was on SM radio a few months ago and I thought he did a excellent Job describing thoughtprints and the unconscious mind,he says his research was put into the the case files by the Aruban Authorities.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 13, 2008, 11:39:49 PM
******* - did you see Patrick's website?

http://patrickvandereem.nl/

(http://criminal.prodgprojects.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/movel-ad_layout_01-half.jpg)

Welcome back *******!   Now we just need to get Anna back and build a  bridge over the water!

Ok, Klaas, I am confused.  Earlier you and some Dutchies were posting translations from Patricks blog and now this one is in English? Is it new?   I tried clicking on his email to send an Invite to SM, but didn't work.  Guess I'll need to leave comments...   Monkeys,  help me try and get Patrick to come post at SM!!!



Wow Dihannah - Yes I see it's in English now so Patrick must have done that.  It was in Dutch before.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 13, 2008, 11:41:29 PM
http://patrickvandereem.nl/

Friday, March 14th, 2008

Message for my American readers

Poentje Castro, a television reporter in Aruba, made a sneak recording of a private conversation with Patrick van der Eem, the insider in the Natalee Holloway case who recorded the confession of Joran van der Sloot during an undercover camera operation. The temptation to slyly record a private conversation with the man who is now famous in Holland and the USA for recording a criminal confession must have been just too much to resist.

However, his enthusiasm was to get the better of him. Keeping one camera rolling after the granted interview, the reporter forgot that you have to ask clear questions, and the answers – as the reporter now claims – should throw a different light on the case. In that sense the reporter failed. This was aggravated by biased editing of his material.

Both the aired preview and Castro himself were already facing heavy criticism on the front pages of Aruba’s newspapers. Due to the leading questioning and “clumsy” edits, the Aruban broadcaster decided not to air the complete interview, but rather fade the channel to black. Over the years, Castro has become known for his firm belief that Joran van der Sloot is not guilty, and currently fosters the speculative opinion that Joran must have made his confession up.

Due to the ongoing hype of the Natalee Holloway case in the Netherlands, the Dutch press unfortunately reported several of these suggestive statements, under the misconception that they represented hard news.

According to the Dutch translation from the original Papiamento (Aruba’s native tongue), Patrick says: “But I know who dumped the body in the sea…” in one fragment of the private conversation. While this hit the headlines, it is clear that Van der Eem was speculating, in a similar way to someone who says: “But I know that the New York Yankees will win the Superbowl this year”. Van Der Eem has a private opinion about who assisted Joran van der Sloot, but not the actual knowledge.

In another fragment that made headlines as hard news, Van der Eem is reported to have said: “because I already know him (Joran) for so many years”. However, at the end of the same sentence, he states that he knows Joran in flesh and blood only “for seven months” for the duration of the undercover operation plus aftermath. What he in fact says in the first part is that “he had already heard of him (Joran) for so many years”, as have so many of us since Natalee’s disappearance.

When Van der Eem tries to explain to the reporter that he gave the media the same information as he gave the police as a witness, the reporter edits the fragment in such a way that suggests Van der Eem paid the media and the police, which is patently complete nonsense, but has nevertheless been reported as a scoop by some Dutch media.

The above gives a clear impression of the lack of editorial and translational integrity of the recording of the private conversation, of the interview and of those fragments that have been broadcast. The clumsy translation from the Papiemento added further to this canard.

Castro has been attempting to sell his TV interview to numerous networks, both in the Netherlands and the USA. Before the broadcast, he also made an offer for Van Der Eem to buy the tapes, which was declined outright by his spokesman. Mr. Schouten: “He didn’t mean the costs to copy a DVD or for stamps. Mr. Castro wanted to receive a fee for the tapes. That’s like giving candy to a child that misbehaves. I have requested his lawyer now formally to send me these recordings from the first to the last second without any editing or cuts.”



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Dihannah1 on March 13, 2008, 11:46:27 PM
Ok, I copied/pasted his email address and sent him a nice email thanking him for what he did and informing him of who we are, what we have done, about SM Radio and the forum.   I also mentioned Peter was interviewed here.  I asked him to check the site out and welcomed him to join, as he is a hero here.

So, we'll see. I'll let you know if/what he responds.   I encourage others to do the same.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Destiny on March 13, 2008, 11:47:14 PM
Hello :)

I am very humbled and at a loss for words over a few people asking about me and showing there concerns. From the bottom of my heart I thank you! There are so many special people on this forum and I am very proud to be standing along side of you all in this fight for Justice.

Please do not think of me of doing anything wrong or to judge me without knowing the facts first. I know if you were in my shoes you would understand completely. If you have concerns or question me in anyway,please do not hesitate to ask for the truth. Like many of you I have poured my heart and soul into helping and I would never do anything that wasn't in Natalee's best interest's. Everyone has a breaking point and I reached mine,I am the type of person where we do it with 100% honesty or I don't do it at all. I needed to take a break for a few days and I truly appreciate the support given to me from people that know me.

I became interested in helping Natalee and her Family on June 2nd 2005,I have used the name ******* in every post that I have ever made and I have never ever lied about anything. I hope you all know that.

Thank you,

*******

******* ... we know your heart and ... it is good.
 ::MonkeyCool::

Janet
So very true!  I'm delighted to see you back, *******!  ::MonkeyDance::

I also agree with Kermit, Don't ever change!  ::MonkeyDance::


Oh Crap!  I'm sooooooooooo dang happy...I jes gotta do da Monkey Dance for *******.... ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::...wow...I feel better....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 13, 2008, 11:49:32 PM
Ok, I copied/pasted his email address and sent him a nice email thanking him for what he did and informing him of who we are, what we have done, about SM Radio and the forum.   I also mentioned Peter was interviewed here.  I asked him to check the site out and welcomed him to join, as he is a hero here.

So, we'll see. I'll let you know if/what he responds.   I encourage others to do the same.

Thanks Dihannah - that would be great!  I hope when he registers I can figure out who he is  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Destiny on March 13, 2008, 11:51:12 PM
I've been following all of you for a very long time.  I was approved today, and I'm not the Troll from pages 9 and 10.  I'm very happy to be here. ::MonkeyWink::  I'm glad that ******* didn't go away.
Welcome SS!  ::MonkeyDance::

Welcome to the Cage SS....hope you like bananas....;-)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: SS on March 13, 2008, 11:52:11 PM
I have a question and I'd like to know what the rest of you think.  I am about 75% of the way through the Andrew Hodges book, Into the Deep, and my brain is starting to feel like Swiss cheese.  Do any of you understand how this man deciphers the statements? Everytime that I think I'm starting to get a clue, he seems to go off in another direction.  I agree with a lot of his theories, I just don't  comprehend his process and new rules seem to be added with every sentence that he deciphers.  Is it just me???  ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyConfused::

 ::MonkeyLaugh:: Can't help you SS as I haven't read his book yet! He certainly analyzes Deepak's emails like no one else :) Much of what he says I agree with but I don't think Natalee was given XTC as that wouldn't make her unconscious. I also think there are some deceptions and parts of this case that the good Dr is not aware of to draw a final conclusion. He was on SM radio a few months ago and I thought he did a excellent Job describing thoughtprints and the unconscious mind,he says his research was put into the the case files by the Aruban Authorities.

I do agree with much that he says.  I'm not in complete agreement with everything that he says.  Until about six months ago, I didn't even think that Natalee was in the water.  For some reason, I changed my mind.  Hodges really gets into a lot of detail that he says he is deciphering from Deepak's email.  Some of the things that he gets from the email make a lot of sense, but then out of the blue he comes up with the basis for other theories from clusters of words and it makes no sense at all.  Some phrases in the email have double and triple meanings.  I understand the basis for the guilty subconcious mind wanting to be heard, but some of the correlations he makes don't seem to make any sense at all.  Others seem to fit. I wonder if it was just me who has had this reaction to the book.
 ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: A's Fever on March 13, 2008, 11:52:53 PM
I'm delighted you are back in the cage, *******!  You were missed.   ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Dihannah1 on March 13, 2008, 11:54:52 PM
Ok, I copied/pasted his email address and sent him a nice email thanking him for what he did and informing him of who we are, what we have done, about SM Radio and the forum.   I also mentioned Peter was interviewed here.  I asked him to check the site out and welcomed him to join, as he is a hero here.

So, we'll see. I'll let you know if/what he responds.   I encourage others to do the same.

Thanks Dihannah - that would be great!  I hope when he registers I can figure out who he is  ::MonkeyWink::

I was afraid of that too!   I asked him to get in touch with me for more info. if he needed it, just in case!  I can at least send him to the right place and how to do it, plus give you a heads up.  Fingers crossed!  I do hope he responds or just joins!  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Destiny on March 13, 2008, 11:58:32 PM
http://www.prive.nl/evert/

Translation from the tabloid magazine (posted by Debbie at BFN):

Employer institute confirms: This is where Joran is!

The past weeks no one has seen him anymore. He would be in an institute but that was denied by his family. Even though "Privé" found out that Joran for sure is staying in the forest of Utrecht, hidden behind a high fence.

His father denied all he could, but that is a good habit for the van der Sloot family. Even though Joran, to whom everyone points in the Natalee Holloway case, for sure is institutionalized.

That explains why of the 7 million people who watched the sensational broadcasting of Peter de Vries on February 3, no one has seen him publicly since.

An employer of the Willem Arntzhoeve in Den Dolder, Utrecht: "Yes, he is staying with us. Kept away from the outside world and almost no one is in contact with him".

Kept away from the outside world, behind the high fence's and in between countless trees Joran again is the center of a big investigation. This time not by police or justice or reporters, but by well educated psychiatrists who try to find out which behavior disorders make Joran the young men he is.

The treatment is happening with a lot of secrecy, no one besides the Privé source wants to confirm that Joran indeed is committed in this institution that has a very good reputation.

In the center 24 people are being hospitalized, in the age ranging from 18-60. At the Roosenberg department there are people with behavior problems in combination with an addiction.

There are two units. At one one can commit themselves when there is a need for it, at the other one enters because a court follows up on the advise of the forensic psychiatric unit.

It cannot be anything other then that Joran, after the broadcast voluntarily has presented himself at help institutions.

Probably the police in Rotterdam, where he was questioned shortly after the broadcast, has pointed out that option to him.  Joran would have realised the necessity of undergoing profound psychiatric treatment/investigation.

For the police him being committed meant rest. The groups of people who gathered at Drachten after a channel had reported that Joran was staying in an apartment there, promised no good. Such a "volksgericht" could have taken place any moment at any place, could have repeated itself when the real Joran had showed his face somewhere.

The moods in the country were out of control after the broadcast.

Some satisfaction for Natalee's mother Beth Holloway must be that Joran's current home is very similar to a prison cell.

Documentation of the Willem Arntzhoeve shows that the rooms of the patients are not bigger then 2,5 by 3,5 meters, and contains no more then a bed, a chair, a small locker and a shelve that can be used as a table.

The commitment would be for a period of 1 or 2 years. Unless of course on Aruba new indications are discovered that would lead to Joran changing his Dutch "cell" for an Aruban one.




Woo-hoo Klaas...tabloid or not...it is a start.....Thanks!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Observer on March 14, 2008, 12:00:11 AM
Ok, I copied/pasted his email address and sent him a nice email thanking him for what he did and informing him of who we are, what we have done, about SM Radio and the forum.   I also mentioned Peter was interviewed here.  I asked him to check the site out and welcomed him to join, as he is a hero here.

So, we'll see. I'll let you know if/what he responds.   I encourage others to do the same.

Thats a great idea Dihannah1! I would love to see him interviewed by Dana!  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 14, 2008, 12:00:38 AM
Ok, I copied/pasted his email address and sent him a nice email thanking him for what he did and informing him of who we are, what we have done, about SM Radio and the forum.   I also mentioned Peter was interviewed here.  I asked him to check the site out and welcomed him to join, as he is a hero here.

So, we'll see. I'll let you know if/what he responds.   I encourage others to do the same.

Thanks Dihannah - that would be great!  I hope when he registers I can figure out who he is  ::MonkeyWink::

I was afraid of that too!   I asked him to get in touch with me for more info. if he needed it, just in case!  I can at least send him to the right place and how to do it, plus give you a heads up.  Fingers crossed!  I do hope he responds or just joins!  ::MonkeyWink::

Very cool.  If he decides to register see if you can find out what nickname he's using so I can approve him right away.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 14, 2008, 12:01:22 AM
Yes Destiny - it's a start and it might be true!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 14, 2008, 12:03:35 AM
Thanks everyone! Friendships and support mean a great deal to me and I am truly thankful! It is very humbling..

Anything I missed the last few days?

******* ... you have proven your dedication to the cause of justice for Natalee Holloway over and over again in both your words and actions.  You are worthy of being upheld.

Good Night Monkeys and ... have a good weekend.  I will be away for a few days.

 ::MonkeyCool::

Janet
8:10 PM

Nite Janet - hope you are going to be away having some fun!

You bet!

In the morning hubby ... six year old grandaughter and ... I are catching a ferry and crossing the Georgia Strait to Vancouver Island to visit eldest son, DIL and 18 month old grandson.  They will be over on the mainland next weekend for Easter but ... little Miss Muffet talked us into taking her away for special alone time ... special alone time away from her three brothers.  Her little cousin is where it is at.

Good Night again Monkeys ... this time for real.

Special thanks to Klaas and ALL the mods.

Janet
9:00 PM


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on March 14, 2008, 12:06:24 AM
http://patrickvandereem.nl/

Friday, March 14th, 2008

Message for my American readers

Poentje Castro, a television reporter in Aruba, made a sneak recording of a private conversation with Patrick van der Eem, the insider in the Natalee Holloway case who recorded the confession of Joran van der Sloot during an undercover camera operation. The temptation to slyly record a private conversation with the man who is now famous in Holland and the USA for recording a criminal confession must have been just too much to resist.

However, his enthusiasm was to get the better of him. Keeping one camera rolling after the granted interview, the reporter forgot that you have to ask clear questions, and the answers – as the reporter now claims – should throw a different light on the case. In that sense the reporter failed. This was aggravated by biased editing of his material.

Both the aired preview and Castro himself were already facing heavy criticism on the front pages of Aruba’s newspapers. Due to the leading questioning and “clumsy” edits, the Aruban broadcaster decided not to air the complete interview, but rather fade the channel to black. Over the years, Castro has become known for his firm belief that Joran van der Sloot is not guilty, and currently fosters the speculative opinion that Joran must have made his confession up.

Due to the ongoing hype of the Natalee Holloway case in the Netherlands, the Dutch press unfortunately reported several of these suggestive statements, under the misconception that they represented hard news.

According to the Dutch translation from the original Papiamento (Aruba’s native tongue), Patrick says: “But I know who dumped the body in the sea…” in one fragment of the private conversation. While this hit the headlines, it is clear that Van der Eem was speculating, in a similar way to someone who says: “But I know that the New York Yankees will win the Superbowl this year”. Van Der Eem has a private opinion about who assisted Joran van der Sloot, but not the actual knowledge.

In another fragment that made headlines as hard news, Van der Eem is reported to have said: “because I already know him (Joran) for so many years”. However, at the end of the same sentence, he states that he knows Joran in flesh and blood only “for seven months” for the duration of the undercover operation plus aftermath. What he in fact says in the first part is that “he had already heard of him (Joran) for so many years”, as have so many of us since Natalee’s disappearance.

When Van der Eem tries to explain to the reporter that he gave the media the same information as he gave the police as a witness, the reporter edits the fragment in such a way that suggests Van der Eem paid the media and the police, which is patently complete nonsense, but has nevertheless been reported as a scoop by some Dutch media.

The above gives a clear impression of the lack of editorial and translational integrity of the recording of the private conversation, of the interview and of those fragments that have been broadcast. The clumsy translation from the Papiemento added further to this canard.

Castro has been attempting to sell his TV interview to numerous networks, both in the Netherlands and the USA. Before the broadcast, he also made an offer for Van Der Eem to buy the tapes, which was declined outright by his spokesman. Mr. Schouten: “He didn’t mean the costs to copy a DVD or for stamps. Mr. Castro wanted to receive a fee for the tapes. That’s like giving candy to a child that misbehaves. I have requested his lawyer now formally to send me these recordings from the first to the last second without any editing or cuts.”



Thanks Klaas.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Observer on March 14, 2008, 12:16:27 AM
So very true!  I'm delighted to see you back, *******!  ::MonkeyDance::

I also agree with Kermit, Don't ever change!  ::MonkeyDance::


Oh Crap!  I'm sooooooooooo dang happy...I jes gotta do da Monkey Dance for *******.... ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::...wow...I feel better....
Thanks Destiny! :) and A's Fever,TM,Hotping,Magnolia,PI,Janet,Klaas,Vms,Pita,Kat,Dihannah,Kkate,Bmok and everyone else I missed..I am very overwhelmed and I am blown away with your support,It is very much appreciated! Havent seen anything like this since High School  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Kat_Gram on March 14, 2008, 12:18:09 AM
People check into treatment places and because they were not forced in, they can walk away anytime. Once he is feeling better ( detox and food  )  he'll be back out. Probably 30 days.
 
Given what he disclosed about himself and what others have found out, he was heading in that direction anyway. Pre 2005. The process might have been sped up because of the pressure.
If any of that was true. Usually, I have sympathy for people who have serious mental issues or addictions, but not for him for some odd reason. LOL Self inflicted and the parents protecting him his entire life is my guess is the main cause.   


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Dihannah1 on March 14, 2008, 12:20:22 AM
Ok, I copied/pasted his email address and sent him a nice email thanking him for what he did and informing him of who we are, what we have done, about SM Radio and the forum.   I also mentioned Peter was interviewed here.  I asked him to check the site out and welcomed him to join, as he is a hero here.

So, we'll see. I'll let you know if/what he responds.   I encourage others to do the same.

Thats a great idea Dihannah1! I would love to see him interviewed by Dana!  ::MonkeyWink::

I hope so!  I would love to see him join too!

Calling out to all Monkeys!   Send a nice invite to Patrick at petercschouten@planet.nl   to join SM!

Klaas, if I hear back, I will most definately let you know and try to get his Userid so you can approve him asap! 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Destiny on March 14, 2008, 12:21:01 AM
Hey Destiny,

It is driving me nuts trying to figure out where you are.
I live in GA. I have asked Klaas to forward my email addy to you. We may be neighbors.  ::MonkeyHaHa::

I've been to GA does that count?


I've been to GA 3 times, does that count  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Well Dang Klaas...that makes you and honorary *BUBBETTE*...LOL!...the dudes are bubbas...
Well Heck I've never been to GA...I feel left out...LOL  ::MonkeyWaa:: ::MonkeyWink::

Strokes widdle Bubbette Hotping, on her fuwwy widdle Monkey head....You'll get over it.....LOL!!!!!!  Wubs Ja too HP!...AKA... Bubbette HP


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 14, 2008, 12:30:33 AM
I found a photo of me from 1969-70 at Fort Banning, GA  ::MonkeyHaHa:: 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Dihannah1 on March 14, 2008, 12:34:37 AM
I found a photo of me from 1969-70 at Fort Banning, GA  ::MonkeyHaHa:: 

Post it!  We want to see how cute you were!   ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Destiny on March 14, 2008, 12:35:35 AM
I found a photo of me from 1969-70 at Fort Banning, GA  ::MonkeyHaHa:: 


Ooohhhhhhhhhhhhh...bribery fodder...LOL...jes kidding Klaas...care to share Bubbette?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 14, 2008, 12:37:19 AM
I found a photo of me from 1969-70 at Fort Banning, GA  ::MonkeyHaHa:: 

Post it!  We want to see how cute you were!   ::MonkeyWink::
I'm going to go take a quick bath.  I'll think about posting it but not sure if I want to do that, lol  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: hotping on March 14, 2008, 12:38:08 AM
Hey Destiny,

It is driving me nuts trying to figure out where you are.
I live in GA. I have asked Klaas to forward my email addy to you. We may be neighbors.  ::MonkeyHaHa::

I've been to GA does that count?


I've been to GA 3 times, does that count  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Well Dang Klaas...that makes you and honorary *BUBBETTE*...LOL!...the dudes are bubbas...
Well Heck I've never been to GA...I feel left out...LOL  ::MonkeyWaa:: ::MonkeyWink::

Strokes widdle Bubbette Hotping, on her fuwwy widdle Monkey head....You'll get over it.....LOL!!!!!!  Wubs Ja too HP!...AKA... Bubbette HP
Thank You Destiny...I feel SOOOO Much Better Now! LOL!  ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: hotping on March 14, 2008, 12:54:19 AM
So very true!  I'm delighted to see you back, *******!  ::MonkeyDance::

I also agree with Kermit, Don't ever change!  ::MonkeyDance::


Oh Crap!  I'm sooooooooooo dang happy...I jes gotta do da Monkey Dance for *******.... ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::...wow...I feel better....
Thanks Destiny! :) and A's Fever,TM,Hotping,Magnolia,PI,Janet,Klaas,Vms,Pita,Kat,Dihannah,Kkate,Bmok and everyone else I missed..I am very overwhelmed and I am blown away with your support,It is very much appreciated! Havent seen anything like this since High School  ::MonkeyCool::
YW *******!  ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 14, 2008, 12:57:02 AM
Vintage 1969 Fort Banning, GA - look now because I'm going to delete in about 5 minutes:  ::MonkeyWink:: ::MonkeyHaHa::

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?board=24.0


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Observer on March 14, 2008, 12:57:06 AM
I found a photo of me from 1969-70 at Fort Banning, GA  ::MonkeyHaHa:: 

Post it!  We want to see how cute you were!   ::MonkeyWink::
I'm going to go take a quick bath.  I'll think about posting it but not sure if I want to do that, lol  ::MonkeyHaHa::
I would like to see that picture :) I understand if you don't want to show it though  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Lala'sMom on March 14, 2008, 01:00:42 AM
Vintage 1969 Fort Banning, GA - look now because I'm going to delete in about 5 minutes:  ::MonkeyWink:: ::MonkeyHaHa::

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?board=24.0


I always knew there was a valley girl in there. LOL



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 14, 2008, 01:01:58 AM
Vintage 1969 Fort Banning, GA - look now because I'm going to delete in about 5 minutes:  ::MonkeyWink:: ::MonkeyHaHa::

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?board=24.0

Going to delete it 2 minutes


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Dihannah1 on March 14, 2008, 01:03:40 AM
Vintage 1969 Fort Banning, GA - look now because I'm going to delete in about 5 minutes:  ::MonkeyWink:: ::MonkeyHaHa::

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?board=24.0

Oh!  Not fair!  Of all the times I'm having lappy problems!  I can't open it and do other things on it tonight.   You'll have to email it to me.   I may not have time to reboot and then it will be gone ::MonkeyWaa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 14, 2008, 01:05:13 AM
Deleted now  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: hotping on March 14, 2008, 01:05:44 AM
I missed it Too...Klaas You're 2 minutes must be different from mine...LOL!  ::MonkeyWaa::  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 14, 2008, 01:07:12 AM
Vintage 1969 Fort Banning, GA - look now because I'm going to delete in about 5 minutes:  ::MonkeyWink:: ::MonkeyHaHa::

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?board=24.0


I always knew there was a valley girl in there. LOL



LOL, I just loved that outfit it was one of my favorites.  Wash and wear!  My hair is actually longer now than it was then  ::MonkeyEek::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 14, 2008, 01:07:52 AM
I missed it Too...Klaas You're 2 minutes must be different from mine...LOL!  ::MonkeyWaa::  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Sorry Hotping, I saw a guest lurking so decided to delete it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Dihannah1 on March 14, 2008, 01:08:41 AM
KLAAS!!!!   I finally got here and it's deleted!  Give me another chance!!!!  Pleeaaassee!!!!! ::MonkeyWaa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: hotping on March 14, 2008, 01:10:36 AM
I missed it Too...Klaas You're 2 minutes must be different from mine...LOL!  ::MonkeyWaa::  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Sorry Hotping, I saw a guest lurking so decided to delete it.
That's OK....Maybe Next Time!  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: CapsLockWizard on March 14, 2008, 01:10:56 AM
Hi klassend:

see email:

CAPS


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Dihannah1 on March 14, 2008, 01:12:21 AM
Hi klassend:

see email:

CAPS

Well HI Caps!  Anything interesting to share tonight?

How are you doing?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: hotping on March 14, 2008, 01:12:29 AM
Hi Caps....I was Just thinking about You...Hope All is Well!  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 14, 2008, 01:14:13 AM
Back up for a couple minutes


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Observer on March 14, 2008, 01:14:20 AM
I missed it also!!  ::MonkeyWaa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 14, 2008, 01:14:49 AM
Hi klassend:

see email:

CAPS

OK, I'll check now


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 14, 2008, 01:18:17 AM
Back up for a couple minutes

60 seconds and I'm deleting it again

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2704.msg364967#msg364967


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: hotping on March 14, 2008, 01:18:19 AM
Back up for a couple minutes
My Hubby Says Good Looking Lady and I Agree! Thanks Klaas!  ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Observer on March 14, 2008, 01:20:09 AM
Back up for a couple minutes
My Hubby Says Good Looking Lady and I Agree! Thanks Klaas!  ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyCool::
She's like a angel  ::MonkeyWink:: Thanks for sharing!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 14, 2008, 01:20:15 AM
Back up for a couple minutes
My Hubby Says Good Looking Lady and I Agree! Thanks Klaas!  ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyCool::

Remind your husband that photo was taken 39 years ago  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: A's Fever on March 14, 2008, 01:20:41 AM
Vintage 1969 Fort Banning, GA - look now because I'm going to delete in about 5 minutes:  ::MonkeyWink:: ::MonkeyHaHa::

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?board=24.0


Awwwww. . . . exactly the way I pictured you, Klaas!   ::MonkeyHaHa::  ::MonkeyHaHa::  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: hotping on March 14, 2008, 01:22:07 AM
Back up for a couple minutes
My Hubby Says Good Looking Lady and I Agree! Thanks Klaas!  ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyCool::
She's like a angel  ::MonkeyWink:: Thanks for sharing!
Yes...She is Indeed!  ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Dihannah1 on March 14, 2008, 01:23:47 AM
 ::MonkeyWaa:: ::MonkeyWaa:: ::MonkeyWaa::  I go to the bathroom to wash my face and get ready for bed, then you decide to post it!   I missed it again! 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 14, 2008, 01:24:15 AM
Look at the picture there now, LOL  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: hotping on March 14, 2008, 01:25:46 AM
Back up for a couple minutes
My Hubby Says Good Looking Lady and I Agree! Thanks Klaas!  ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyCool::

Remind you husband that photo was taken 39 years ago  ::MonkeyWink::
Well...Don't You know the saying...We Women Improve With Age! My hair is long also I will be 52 this month and I just can't bring Myself to cut it...I just like it that way...LOL!  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Dihannah1 on March 14, 2008, 01:27:12 AM
Look at the picture there now, LOL  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Not fair!  ((crawling into corner pouting like my 4 yr old grandson))  ::MonkeyWaa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: texasmom on March 14, 2008, 01:27:49 AM
Back up for a couple minutes
My Hubby Says Good Looking Lady and I Agree! Thanks Klaas!  ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyCool::
She's like a angel  ::MonkeyWink:: Thanks for sharing!

I missed it!   ::MonkeyWaa::  But I won't ask you to show it again...I'm sure you were and are beautiful!  I'm always on the wrong page at the wrong time! ugghh


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: hotping on March 14, 2008, 01:28:49 AM
Look at the picture there now, LOL  ::MonkeyHaHa::
That is just to Cute! I want One!  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Dihannah1 on March 14, 2008, 01:30:20 AM
Well like a child stomping off pouting, I'm tired now and going to hit the bunky.  Pouting is tiresome ya know......


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Dihannah1 on March 14, 2008, 01:32:09 AM
And my plan is to wake up from the nightmare of this case and it being solved!  So with that said (prayer), I'm gone for the night.   Klaas,,,,, make it so!   ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 14, 2008, 01:32:46 AM
Well like a child stomping off pouting, I'm tired now and going to hit the bunky.  Pouting is tiresome ya know......

LOOK NOW


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Dihannah1 on March 14, 2008, 01:35:37 AM
YES!!!!  I saw it this time!    ::MonkeyDance::   You WERE a lil cutie!  And as stated above,  women get better with age, so would love to see a current one.  But I won't ask too much!   ::MonkeyHaHa::

Ok, I'll sleep better now.    ::MonkeyWink::

Thanks!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Dihannah1 on March 14, 2008, 01:40:15 AM
G'night Monkey family!   Sweet Dreams!

Glad our back *******!

Anna?  If your lurking out there,  please come back too!   We need you both!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 14, 2008, 01:42:46 AM
Nite Dihannah


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: pinkbanana on March 14, 2008, 01:50:19 AM
So NICE to see ******* back!!  ::MonkeyWink::

d


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: hotping on March 14, 2008, 01:55:21 AM
Good Night All!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: caesu on March 14, 2008, 01:56:56 AM
if the Privé article is right, and i highly doubt this because it is one of the most crappy tabloids.

if this is correct jvds is in one of these buildings:

click (http://maps.google.nl/maps?f=q&hl=nl&geocode=sll=52.469397,6.685181&sspn=2.365899,5.141602&ie=UTF8&ll=52.148856,5.246937&spn=0.009309,0.020084&t=h&z=16)

about Roosenberg - Willem Arntz Hoeve:
http://www.altrecht.nl/www/site/32/180/330

(http://www.volkskrant.nl/multimedia/archive/00026/DD_Graphics_26366b.jpg)
(http://www.hugenholtz.net/wahoeve.jpg)

Roosenberg A DD-unit:
http://www.altrecht.nl/www/site/32/180/332

location directions:
http://www.altrecht.nl/www/site/32/211/384

information brochure about Altrecht W.A. Hoeve:
http://www.noormens.nl/psychiatrie_onderdak/boekjes_altrecht/wa_hoeve_den_dolder.pdf

translation request are welcome.
but basically Roosenberg is a rehab clinic for people who are mentally disordered.
DD = double diagnosed (severe addiction / mentally disordered).

(there is some history regarding W.A. Hoeve / Dennendal. with the head psychiatrist gone a little mad himself - going against the managment - and the police had to come in and evict everybody, but that's all off-topic http://www.nieuw-dennendal.nl/hist-beel-16.html)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 14, 2008, 01:57:57 AM
Nite Hotping


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 14, 2008, 02:01:44 AM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/1LOCK.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 14, 2008, 02:07:44 AM
Wow caesu - I think I see him leaning out of one of the windows  ::MonkeyHaHa::

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/wahoeveJoran.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Observer on March 14, 2008, 02:11:09 AM
So NICE to see ******* back!!  ::MonkeyWink::

d

Nice to see you also D :) I wish we could have met in NYC as I would have liked to been a part of your group.. I really like the people you spent that day with!

Night Hotping!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Observer on March 14, 2008, 02:13:55 AM
Wow caesu - I think I see him leaning out of one of the windows  ::MonkeyHaHa::

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/wahoeveJoran.jpg)

I dIdn't realize that was  a rehab clinic for people who are mentally disordered. ::MonkeyShocked::

I wonder if it's true?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: texasmom on March 14, 2008, 02:19:40 AM
Wow caesu - I think I see him leaning out of one of the windows  ::MonkeyHaHa::

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/wahoeveJoran.jpg)

I think he is close to Guido,I wonder if they are sharing a suite?  ::MonkeyWink::

 ::MonkeyHaHa::  ::MonkeyTongue::  ::MonkeyHaHa::   ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: pinkbanana on March 14, 2008, 02:25:09 AM
So NICE to see ******* back!!  ::MonkeyWink::

d

Nice to see you also D :) I wish we could have met in NYC as I would have liked to been a part of your group.. I really like the people you spent that day with!

Night Hotping!

I so wish too...I heard GOOD things about you.  ::MonkeyWink::
I like them too. They where ALL very WARM and SWEET! I felt like I knew them for a very long time.

d


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: klaasend on March 14, 2008, 02:25:52 AM
******* - I think you're right!  ::MonkeyHaHa::

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/wahoeveJoranG.jpg)


GOODNIGHT ALL!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: pinkbanana on March 14, 2008, 02:26:31 AM
So NICE to see ******* back!!  ::MonkeyWink::

d

Nice to see you also D :) I wish we could have met in NYC as I would have liked to been a part of your group.. I really like the people you spent that day with!

Night Hotping!

I so wish too...I heard GOOD things about you.  ::MonkeyWink::
I like them too. They were ALL very WARM and SWEET! I felt like I knew them for a very long time.

d

should be were not where...sorry


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: pinkbanana on March 14, 2008, 02:28:09 AM
Nite Klaas.

d


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: texasmom on March 14, 2008, 02:30:07 AM
 ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::Klaas, I did finally get to see the picture earlier!  As I thought beautiful then and I'm sure beautiful now!  Thanks for putting it back up for those like me with snail paced internet!  And I loved the cute little monkey in the peach dress! awwwww

I thought I'd posted this right after I saw the picture but storms are interfering and I guess it didn't go through. 

Thanks for all you do Klaas, I know I don't say it enough, but I mean it from the heart!  You are a blessing to all of us here, and I truly appreciate you!

TM   :smt060


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Observer on March 14, 2008, 02:39:47 AM
So NICE to see ******* back!!  ::MonkeyWink::

d

Nice to see you also D :) I wish we could have met in NYC as I would have liked to been a part of your group.. I really like the people you spent that day with!

Night Hotping!

I so wish too...I heard GOOD things about you.  ::MonkeyWink::
I like them too. They where ALL very WARM and SWEET! I felt like I knew them for a very long time.

d

I know I missed out bigtime :( I really wanted to see J4N and her husband again..She really needs to come to SM more  :wink: Yes I asked all about you and Bob and I heard nothing but great things! Sure wish they did these shows when it wasn't so darn cold!  ::MonkeyCool::

Night pinkbanana, downloadingdaddy, ocgirl, IBE, texasmom, klaasend, CapsLockWizard and iris44  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: caesu on March 14, 2008, 03:11:12 AM
it doesn't really matter. but this it the Roosenburg building:

click (http://maps.google.nl/maps?f=q&hl=nl&geocode=sll=52.469397,6.685181&sspn=2.365899,5.141602&ie=UTF8&ll=52.148856,5.246937&spn=0.009309,0.020084&t=h&z=16)

(http://i25.tinypic.com/34fcp06.png)

i figured that out from this contractor-site:
http://www.lagerwaardarchitect.nl/project.php?id=18&image=6&category=1
they planned to build something on top of the existing building. for long-stay patients.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: caesu on March 14, 2008, 03:17:33 AM
it doesn't really matter. but this it the Roosenburg building:

(http://i25.tinypic.com/34fcp06.png)

i figured that out from this contractor-site:
http://www.lagerwaardarchitect.nl/project.php?id=18&image=6&category=1
they planned to build something on top of the existing building. for long-stay patients.

better google earth link (http://maps.google.nl/maps?f=q&hl=nl&geocode=sll%3D52.469397,6.685181&ie=UTF8&t=h&ll=52.145525,5.243847&spn=0.001164,0.002511&z=19)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: texasmom on March 14, 2008, 03:17:38 AM
 ::MonkeyConfused:: I knew the minute I pressed post that my last post should have been in musings, I'm very sorry!  Please, first mod to see my error move it over to musings for me.  I should have gone to bed a few hours ago is my only excuse...

Goodnight everyone!
TM


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: ocgirl on March 14, 2008, 03:46:38 AM
So NICE to see ******* back!!  ::MonkeyWink::

d

Nice to see you also D :) I wish we could have met in NYC as I would have liked to been a part of your group.. I really like the people you spent that day with!

Night Hotping!

I so wish too...I heard GOOD things about you.  ::MonkeyWink::
I like them too. They where ALL very WARM and SWEET! I felt like I knew them for a very long time.

d

I know I missed out bigtime :( I really wanted to see J4N and her husband again..She really needs to come to SM more  :wink: Yes I asked all about you and Bob and I heard nothing but great things! Sure wish they did these shows when it wasn't so darn cold!  ::MonkeyCool::

Night pinkbanana, downloadingdaddy, ocgirl, IBE, texasmom, klaasend, CapsLockWizard and iris44  ::MonkeyWink::

Nighty Night back to you *******....its truly wonderful to see ya....(Klass, I missed both your postings of the pix....boohoo...).  Everybody play nice in the cage and I'll see you again tomorrow....(waving over my shoulder....padding off to my bunk).


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Observer on March 14, 2008, 05:04:34 AM
Ok, I copied/pasted his email address and sent him a nice email thanking him for what he did and informing him of who we are, what we have done, about SM Radio and the forum.   I also mentioned Peter was interviewed here.  I asked him to check the site out and welcomed him to join, as he is a hero here.

So, we'll see. I'll let you know if/what he responds.   I encourage others to do the same.

Thats a great idea Dihannah1! I would love to see him interviewed by Dana!  ::MonkeyWink::

I hope so!  I would love to see him join too!

Calling out to all Monkeys!   Send a nice invite to Patrick at petercschouten@planet.nl   to join SM!

Klaas, if I hear back, I will most definately let you know and try to get his Userid so you can approve him asap! 

Thanks Dihanna!


I just heard back from Patricks spokesperson in Holland and he will soon register here at SM. He said Patrick is heavily involved in writing together with E.E. Byars, but of course will one day come to Scaredmonkeys. He is thinking of a nice campaign for all of us here at SM to get a exclusive read of Patrick’s first chapter, but he need's to solve a few legal details. He is also in contact with Dana Pretzer to do a interview on the Radio!  ::MonkeyDance::

I mentioned to him the great Dutch people we have on our forum that told us about Stan De Jong,because he said the the last two weeks the press attacks in Holland were stupid, mean and fierce but he managed to counter them. Of course I also told him about all the fantastic people here at SM that would love it if Patrick could say hello some time soon. I think he would appreciate it if we would leave nice comments on Patricks Blog.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: JE on March 14, 2008, 05:09:08 AM
Hey ******* good to see you're back ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on March 14, 2008, 05:17:05 AM
http://www.prive.nl/evert/

Translation from the tabloid magazine (posted by Debbie at BFN):

Employer institute confirms: This is where Joran is!

The past weeks no one has seen him anymore. He would be in an institute but that was denied by his family. Even though "Privé" found out that Joran for sure is staying in the forest of Utrecht, hidden behind a high fence.

His father denied all he could, but that is a good habit for the van der Sloot family. Even though Joran, to whom everyone points in the Natalee Holloway case, for sure is institutionalized.

That explains why of the 7 million people who watched the sensational broadcasting of Peter de Vries on February 3, no one has seen him publicly since.

An employer of the Willem Arntzhoeve in Den Dolder, Utrecht: "Yes, he is staying with us. Kept away from the outside world and almost no one is in contact with him".

Kept away from the outside world, behind the high fence's and in between countless trees Joran again is the center of a big investigation. This time not by police or justice or reporters, but by well educated psychiatrists who try to find out which behavior disorders make Joran the young men he is.

The treatment is happening with a lot of secrecy, no one besides the Privé source wants to confirm that Joran indeed is committed in this institution that has a very good reputation.

In the center 24 people are being hospitalized, in the age ranging from 18-60. At the Roosenberg department there are people with behavior problems in combination with an addiction.

There are two units. At one one can commit themselves when there is a need for it, at the other one enters because a court follows up on the advise of the forensic psychiatric unit.

It cannot be anything other then that Joran, after the broadcast voluntarily has presented himself at help institutions.

Probably the police in Rotterdam, where he was questioned shortly after the broadcast, has pointed out that option to him.  Joran would have realised the necessity of undergoing profound psychiatric treatment/investigation.

For the police him being committed meant rest. The groups of people who gathered at Drachten after a channel had reported that Joran was staying in an apartment there, promised no good. Such a "volksgericht" could have taken place any moment at any place, could have repeated itself when the real Joran had showed his face somewhere.

The moods in the country were out of control after the broadcast.

Some satisfaction for Natalee's mother Beth Holloway must be that Joran's current home is very similar to a prison cell.

Documentation of the Willem Arntzhoeve shows that the rooms of the patients are not bigger then 2,5 by 3,5 meters, and contains no more then a bed, a chair, a small locker and a shelve that can be used as a table.

The commitment would be for a period of 1 or 2 years. Unless of course on Aruba new indications are discovered that would lead to Joran changing his Dutch "cell" for an Aruban one.



Oh bull caca.IF joran is in there then I would have to say that this is the only way the arubans can possibly go forward and end this case without bringing out the obvious coverup and corruption in this case.I think we all know dang well joran would never volunteer to go into a mental hospital(HE doesn't think there's anything wrong with HIM)so if he is there it was a deal worked out between his parents and the aruban so called justice department.Maybe they gave the van der ditches a choice"put your monster son in a mental ward(when he gets out we will try him in court and he can claim the insanity defense,time served,and our precious tourism and corruptions will go on) or we will be forced to take care of him and his big mouth". ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: Observer on March 14, 2008, 05:17:29 AM
Hey ******* good to see you're back ::MonkeyWink::
Thank you very much..We need a Elvis Monkey  ::MonkeyHaHa::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Shell on March 14, 2008, 05:28:15 AM
I miss him too

I miss him also.  Very kind to me, always comments on my comments, I do appreciate him.

Always kind to me as well and an important part of this forum. I hope all is okay with him.

Welcome back!!!!!!  It wasn't the same without you  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: GBMW on March 14, 2008, 05:31:37 AM
tabloid gossip magazine Privé reporting Joran is in a mental clinic near Dutch city of Utrecht.
also interview with Beth in their upcoming issue.

http://www.prive.nl/

thanks.....someone has to know where that piece of slime is.....he can't hide out forever.....has anyone checked to see of he ahs been on his facebook or whatever recently

Joran has been logging into his myspace a lot of times.

The treatment is supposed to be for 1 or 2 years? No way Joran would do such a thing if he wasn't obliged to do so. As he has stated several times Joran doesn't believe in psychiatrics or any form of treatment like this.
His lawyer said that he was at the same place he was since that monday after the show. He wouldn't go into such a facility just one day after the show if he didn't really have to. I can't believe he would do this voluntarily.

He's probably in some kind of treatment but not for 1 or 2 years and only because it would look good for the case not because he is convinced he needs it ;-)
And Prive is a tabloid; writing an article based on one quote? I haven't read the article yet; I'll get the magazine this afternoon...

According to Patrick van der Eem / Peter Schouten Jorans lawyer has stated that Joran is in Germany. Arnhem is near the German - Dutch border and people don't really know Joran there; he could hide there and still go out from time to time without people knowing. And get visits from friends & family.....that does make more sense to me....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Observer on March 14, 2008, 05:41:35 AM

Hi Shell and TY! I hope everything is well with you :)

I agree GBMW,I think Joran is probably in Germany as Jossy Mansur told us that also..He can be there anonymously and live with little fear of being hassled. Do they do border checks for Drugs? He will run out of his pot sooner or later  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: GBMW on March 14, 2008, 05:43:30 AM
http://www.prive.nl/evert/

For the police him being committed meant rest. The groups of people who gathered at Drachten after a channel had reported that Joran was staying in an apartment there, promised no good. Such a "volksgericht" could have taken place any moment at any place, could have repeated itself when the real Joran had showed his face somewhere.

Quote

For the record: I've seen footage from a mobile phone; Joran was there! We couldn't air it because the person who made the footage didn't want us to...but no doubt it was him. And he wasn't staying in the house 'Hart van Nederland' showed but in another flat in this apartmentbuilding.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: GBMW on March 14, 2008, 06:03:53 AM

Hi Shell and TY! I hope everything is well with you :)

I agree GBMW,I think Joran is probably in Germany as Jossy Mansur told us that also..He can be there anonymously and live with little fear of being hassled. Do they do border checks for Drugs? He will run out of his pot sooner or later  ::MonkeyWink::

No not really. My parents live near the border & we've got family living in Germany; so we go there quite often. On a rare (really rare) occasion there is a check near the border.

But that indeed is another thing; in such a facility I doubt there would be a computer waiting for him with acces to gambling sites & pot...I doubt it. And no daddy to smuggle the stuff inside hahaha.
Can you see the picture: a day after the show...the whole night of discussing and talking with lawyers / chatting with people...tired, annoyed, pissed off...Joran would go come with us to a facility for ....treatment? Oh and you will have no acces to a computer or pot in any way....will you pack your bags and come with us? Joran: yeah, sure! That's a good idea! Somehow I can't see that this has happened.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Peaches on March 14, 2008, 06:07:31 AM
I have a question and I'd like to know what the rest of you think.  I am about 75% of the way through the Andrew Hodges book, Into the Deep, and my brain is starting to feel like Swiss cheese.  Do any of you understand how this man deciphers the statements? Everytime that I think I'm starting to get a clue, he seems to go off in another direction.  I agree with a lot of his theories, I just don't  comprehend his process and new rules seem to be added with every sentence that he deciphers.  Is it just me???  ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyConfused::

Welcome to the Cage.  I was hoping a couple people who DON'T have chemo brain would get thru it first before I tried it.  I read over his website and I understand kinda where he's going sometimes.  It does sound like an interesting book but others who have attempted it say it's slow to get going........


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: mojo on March 14, 2008, 06:09:42 AM

Joran has been logging into his myspace a lot of times.

The treatment is supposed to be for 1 or 2 years? No way Joran would do such a thing if he wasn't obliged to do so. As he has stated several times Joran doesn't believe in psychiatrics or any form of treatment like this.
His lawyer said that he was at the same place he was since that monday after the show. He wouldn't go into such a facility just one day after the show if he didn't really have to. I can't believe he would do this voluntarily.

He's probably in some kind of treatment but not for 1 or 2 years and only because it would look good for the case not because he is convinced he needs it ;-)
And Prive is a tabloid; writing an article based on one quote? I haven't read the article yet; I'll get the magazine this afternoon...

According to Patrick van der Eem / Peter Schouten Jorans lawyer has stated that Joran is in Germany. Arnhem is near the German - Dutch border and people don't really know Joran there; he could hide there and still go out from time to time without people knowing. And get visits from friends & family.....that does make more sense to me....

i'm in agreement that he would not go here voluntarily -- it would have been presented as his only option. now, we find that even joran's lawyer may be a liar  ::MonkeyConfused:: or perhaps that was an option that was floated at the time the lawyer said it, but you're right, GBMW -- this is a tactic or some sort of manouver -- this is not an honest attempt to get help. no doubt, the vd sloots are planning their next move. and perhaps seeing this as a way to foil any civil suit. dishonest at so many levels.  ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: Observer on March 14, 2008, 06:52:58 AM
User since     10/14/2006 11:42:43 AM
Last login    3/4/2008 9:22:11 AM
Real name    Joran

http://www.pocketfives.com/profiles/joran_sloot

============================================
He likes to play at partypoker with the name AANOTILTKK with a sharks fin as his logo

Username     Games Played     Av. Profit     Av. Stake     Av. ROI     Total
AANOTILTKK   131games   $20               $61                 17%            $2,560     -   
Party Poker   


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: bluwaters on March 14, 2008, 07:48:10 AM
Deleted now  ::MonkeyCool::

Well, this teaches me not to go to bed early!!!

Welcome SS and 3doglady!  (http://i92.photobucket.com/albums/l28/TallyAnna/smilies/welcome2.gif)

If Joran is indeed in a psychiatric hospital, he will only stay as long as he feels it is safe to go out again.

I love Patrick's website! He links to SM and BFN!  ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 14, 2008, 07:51:08 AM

Joran has been logging into his myspace a lot of times.

The treatment is supposed to be for 1 or 2 years? No way Joran would do such a thing if he wasn't obliged to do so. As he has stated several times Joran doesn't believe in psychiatrics or any form of treatment like this.
His lawyer said that he was at the same place he was since that monday after the show. He wouldn't go into such a facility just one day after the show if he didn't really have to. I can't believe he would do this voluntarily.

He's probably in some kind of treatment but not for 1 or 2 years and only because it would look good for the case not because he is convinced he needs it ;-)
And Prive is a tabloid; writing an article based on one quote? I haven't read the article yet; I'll get the magazine this afternoon...

According to Patrick van der Eem / Peter Schouten Jorans lawyer has stated that Joran is in Germany. Arnhem is near the German - Dutch border and people don't really know Joran there; he could hide there and still go out from time to time without people knowing. And get visits from friends & family.....that does make more sense to me....


Agree GMBW. If he's in there it's a public relations thing. Joran is a cold, hardened psychopath. This reminds me of them throwing him in KIA for three months with his lappy and cell phone. Just another way of protecting him and an attempt to gain sympathy, if true at all.

Paulus is involved, no way he is going to put Joran somewhere that he could spill the beans.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 14, 2008, 07:58:24 AM


The commitment would be for a period of 1 or 2 years. Unless of course on Aruba new indications are discovered that would lead to Joran changing his Dutch "cell" for an Aruban one.

Oh bull caca.IF joran is in there then I would have to say that this is the only way the arubans can possibly go forward and end this case without bringing out the obvious coverup and corruption in this case.I think we all know dang well joran would never volunteer to go into a mental hospital(HE doesn't think there's anything wrong with HIM)so if he is there it was a deal worked out between his parents and the aruban so called justice department.Maybe they gave the van der ditches a choice"put your monster son in a mental ward(when he gets out we will try him in court and he can claim the insanity defense,time served,and our precious tourism and corruptions will go on) or we will be forced to take care of him and his big mouth". ::MonkeyNoNo::


I suspect the same Karma. This (if true) gets hims out of Hans Mos' hair, gives him an insanity defense so they won't have to prosecute him. Pinhead Hans had the case all buttoned up and closed until Joran's confession. He and Dop were ready for holiday but Joran made them re-open the case.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: bluwaters on March 14, 2008, 08:02:20 AM


The commitment would be for a period of 1 or 2 years. Unless of course on Aruba new indications are discovered that would lead to Joran changing his Dutch "cell" for an Aruban one.

Oh bull caca.IF joran is in there then I would have to say that this is the only way the arubans can possibly go forward and end this case without bringing out the obvious coverup and corruption in this case.I think we all know dang well joran would never volunteer to go into a mental hospital(HE doesn't think there's anything wrong with HIM)so if he is there it was a deal worked out between his parents and the aruban so called justice department.Maybe they gave the van der ditches a choice"put your monster son in a mental ward(when he gets out we will try him in court and he can claim the insanity defense,time served,and our precious tourism and corruptions will go on) or we will be forced to take care of him and his big mouth". ::MonkeyNoNo::


I suspect the same Karma. This (if true) gets hims out of Hans Mos' hair, gives him an insanity defense so they won't have to prosecute him. Pinhead Hans had the case all buttoned up and closed until Joran's confession. He and Dop were ready for holiday but Joran made them re-open the case.
This is why I don't believe that Joran was aware that he was being taped. It just makes no sense to reopen the case after it was all wrapped up and handed to him like a shiny Christmas present!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 14, 2008, 08:06:38 AM

I suspect the same Karma. This (if true) gets hims out of Hans Mos' hair, gives him an insanity defense so they won't have to prosecute him. Pinhead Hans had the case all buttoned up and closed until Joran's confession. He and Dop were ready for holiday but Joran made them re-open the case.
This is why I don't believe that Joran was aware that he was being taped. It just makes no sense to reopen the case after it was all wrapped up and handed to him like a shiny Christmas present!


Great point, Blu!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Dayhiker on March 14, 2008, 08:08:45 AM

Hi Shell and TY! I hope everything is well with you :)

I agree GBMW,I think Joran is probably in Germany as Jossy Mansur told us that also..He can be there anonymously and live with little fear of being hassled. Do they do border checks for Drugs? He will run out of his pot sooner or later  ::MonkeyWink::


 ::MonkeyDance:: He's not going any place where he can't have his pot, lol! Good to see you back *******!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: bluwaters on March 14, 2008, 08:29:12 AM
Mea Culpa - if this has been addressed....but...

In Patrick's tapes of Joran that we have seen, is it possible to ID which session a segment is from?
As in 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5?
I am wondering if Joran's demeanour changes from session to session, particularly session #5.
Are there any signs in #5 that Joran knew Patrick was taping him? Any clue that shows Hans Mos may have tipped him off?
TIA
 
Off to work...TTYL!  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: anidac on March 14, 2008, 08:35:22 AM
Mea Culpa - if this has been addressed....but...

In Patrick's tapes of Joran that we have seen, is it possible to ID which session a segment is from?
As in 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5?
I am wondering if Joran's demeanour changes from session to session, particularly session #5.
Are there any signs in #5 that Joran knew Patrick was taping him? Any clue that shows Hans Mos may have tipped him off?
TIA
 
Off to work...TTYL!  ::MonkeyCool::

Very good question.  One I have asked myself and wish there wasn't a language issue.  I really want to hear the entire series in order with my own ears and watch with my own eyes.  I donot trust that everything comes through in quite the same way even with a good honest translation.

I am right behind you on my way out the door to work.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on March 14, 2008, 08:48:12 AM
I have a question and I'd like to know what the rest of you think.  I am about 75% of the way through the Andrew Hodges book, Into the Deep, and my brain is starting to feel like Swiss cheese.  Do any of you understand how this man deciphers the statements? Everytime that I think I'm starting to get a clue, he seems to go off in another direction.  I agree with a lot of his theories, I just don't  comprehend his process and new rules seem to be added with every sentence that he deciphers.  Is it just me???  ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyConfused::

Welcome SS. It is not 'just you', lol. The book is very difficult to read.
I understand how he deciphers statements, the thoughtprinting process, in general. However, I cannot totally agree with everything he says regarding Deepak's involvement. I simply do not believe that Natalee died while Deepak was raping her. Some of what was 'thoughtprinted' does make sense and fits into the story...but not that.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: Tater on March 14, 2008, 08:59:06 AM
I found this earlier.I find it disturbing and sure wish our people could find her and have alittle talk..Read her comments on page 4..

http://youtube.com/watch?v=yc9j1kGxyoo


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on March 14, 2008, 09:07:01 AM
Vintage 1969 Fort Banning, GA - look now because I'm going to delete in about 5 minutes:  ::MonkeyWink:: ::MonkeyHaHa::

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?board=24.0


 ::MonkeyWaa:: NOT FAIR....I was drooling on my pillow when you posted it!  :smt091


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: Nut44x4 on March 14, 2008, 09:34:51 AM
I found this earlier.I find it disturbing and sure wish our people could find her and have alittle talk..Read her comments on page 4..

http://youtube.com/watch?v=yc9j1kGxyoo

BelleVK (1 month ago)
i didn't have a crush on him, TheHardProblem, imma hates his gutz. he did something to a girl friend of mine, weeks before natalee.

it's him and that satish and deepak.. they did stuff to natalee, later they cleaned the car like mad monkeys and a boat dropped the body in da ocean.

police knows it, says it cannot be confirmed by other sources..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Tater on March 14, 2008, 09:50:39 AM
I have a question and I'd like to know what the rest of you think.  I am about 75% of the way through the Andrew Hodges book, Into the Deep, and my brain is starting to feel like Swiss cheese.  Do any of you understand how this man deciphers the statements? Everytime that I think I'm starting to get a clue, he seems to go off in another direction.  I agree with a lot of his theories, I just don't  comprehend his process and new rules seem to be added with every sentence that he deciphers.  Is it just me???  ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyConfused::


I'm not reading the book but after watching his youtube videos,I just might.I think he makes perfect sense for the most part and don't seem to have much trouble following his thought pattern.How scarey is that,lol...I've always thought she was in deep water and it seem's he agrees.I wonder if the Persistence ever went out to that trench and looked? I didn't even know there was a trench..How deep can a diver dive in scuba gear?Just curious..One thing that does disturb me is that he put this information out before that area was searched.I can see the rats now scurrying to check it out and make it disappear if it is true... :ncool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: Tater on March 14, 2008, 09:56:32 AM
This is the one where he is talking about the trench!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FOmLSRQJ2PA


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: oceanexploration on March 14, 2008, 10:23:03 AM
Dr. Hodges and I hung out on the back deck of the Persistence where he took me through the thought-print process and how the human mind works in those regards.  After several hours, my mind felt like "swiss-cheese" (Tot - I like that, I may have to use it).  I had to cut him off midway (after several hours) because I was dehydrated and getting severely sun burnt lol.  We finished inside the cool galley of the Persistence. Dr. Hodges never skipped a beat.  His theories are far outside of my expertise, so I'm in no position to judge them as valid or not.  I hope they're valid for their potential application to other future cases and current cold cases.  As far as the search goes, the theories played no part in the planning or execution of the search.  Regardless, I enjoyed talking with him particularly in terms of our mutual faith in Jesus Christ.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: Tater on March 14, 2008, 10:40:42 AM
Dr. Hodges and I hung out on the back deck of the Persistence where he took me through the thought-print process and how the human mind works in those regards.  After several hours, my mind felt like "swiss-cheese" (Tot - I like that, I may have to use it).  I had to cut him off midway (after several hours) because I was dehydrated and getting severely sun burnt lol.  We finished inside the cool galley of the Persistence. Dr. Hodges never skipped a beat.  His theories are far outside of my expertise, so I'm in no position to judge them as valid or not.  I hope they're valid for their potential application to other future cases and current cold cases.  As far as the search goes, the theories played no part in the planning or execution of the search.  Regardless, I enjoyed talking with him particularly in terms of our mutual faith in Jesus Christ.

Hi Ocean,(http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2004-10/867511/icon_hi.gif)
I would have liked to have heard that talk.I'm there anytime,anywhere,anyone,wants to talk about my Jesus...So Ocean,did you search that trench?How far down(deep) can a diver with gear on go? It wouldn't make sense to me that the trench would not be explored unless the Persistence didn't have the capability of doing so?Just curious..

(http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2004-10/867511/GodBlessYou.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: Peaches on March 14, 2008, 10:47:44 AM
Kyle, nice to see you.  Thank you again for all you have done for Natalee.  I bet you took some fabulous photgraphs.  I'd like to see you do something with that.  Surely with your background in ocean explorations, you have some great shots.  You are such a talented writer you could caption and explain the photos no problem.  It would make a great coffee table book for somebody like me who is interested but not very brave.  Or a not too technical book that would inspire kids to learn more about geology or oceanography.  Or you could just tell me to get busy cleaning my house and not worry about you.  Anyway, I think you are talented young man and I will be watching you.  I know you will exceed at whatever you do because you do it for the glory of God.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: Peaches on March 14, 2008, 10:51:38 AM
Pardon my manners, Good morning.  I stayed home from work because my foot hurts.  I think I'm having a relapse of plantar fasciitis.  Good grief.  The fun just never stops.

Destiny, you have mail.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: snoopy on March 14, 2008, 11:01:23 AM
Dr. Hodges and I hung out on the back deck of the Persistence where he took me through the thought-print process and how the human mind works in those regards.  After several hours, my mind felt like "swiss-cheese" (Tot - I like that, I may have to use it).  I had to cut him off midway (after several hours) because I was dehydrated and getting severely sun burnt lol.  We finished inside the cool galley of the Persistence. Dr. Hodges never skipped a beat.  His theories are far outside of my expertise, so I'm in no position to judge them as valid or not.  I hope they're valid for their potential application to other future cases and current cold cases.  As far as the search goes, the theories played no part in the planning or execution of the search.  Regardless, I enjoyed talking with him particularly in terms of our mutual faith in Jesus Christ.

Awesome!!

Good Morning Everybody!!

Klaas I missed the picture.  Darn it.

Standing with the girl

Rock On!!  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: ldstlou on March 14, 2008, 11:11:50 AM
ldstlou and Private Eye - thank you!

Completely O/T
  ::MonkeyCool::

Click on play  ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::

http://llnw.jibjab.com/content/player.swf?content_url=http://www.jibjab.com/sendables/api/remote/LY1C5FPXqaOgCqi9IbaxWNre.xml



too cute!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: Lala'sMom on March 14, 2008, 11:53:55 AM
I have been on you tube watching all the Hodges videos.  Unfortunately, I see lots of things that make little sense to me...then again I am trying to think with my conscious mind and not my unconscious one. LOL   I don't pretend to understand Hodges at all...I think he even goes even more out of the box than most people. That is perfectly fine with me if it helps us find Natalee.  I have always thought it would take some 'out of the box" thinking to solve this crime anyway. This coming from one of the your more "out there" thinkers...whatever gets us there is fine with me.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: A's Fever on March 14, 2008, 11:58:46 AM
Pardon my manners, Good morning.  I stayed home from work because my foot hurts.  I think I'm having a relapse of plantar fasciitis.  Good grief.  The fun just never stops.

Destiny, you have mail.

Oh Peaches I struggle with Plantar, and it's no picnic.  So sorry about your foot pain.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: Peaches on March 14, 2008, 12:25:44 PM
Pardon my manners, Good morning.  I stayed home from work because my foot hurts.  I think I'm having a relapse of plantar fasciitis.  Good grief.  The fun just never stops.

Destiny, you have mail.

Oh Peaches I struggle with Plantar, and it's no picnic.  So sorry about your foot pain.

Well, if you have any great hints or anything that's worked for ya, I'd be a willing ear.  It's my right foot too.  My driving foot.  I have pretty good luck with pain meds and rolling a bottle of frozen water with my foot.  But then my foot gets cold and that pisses me off so what's a girl to do.  Great hints to my Peaches rally thread in the Lounge if you please lest I be accused of hijacking this particularly slow thread. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: Keepthefaith on March 14, 2008, 12:26:39 PM
I agree, I think the thing that sustained them was the the fact that Beth made some many enemies in Aruba and the Aruban public turned against her, so they were the "heroes" of the story, the poor, 'innocent until proven guilty' Dutch family terrorized by the evil, lying, gunslinging, crazy Americans.

In Holland, nobody really followed the case and Europe is more more easy on criminals than here, so the same thing....the crazy American media firestorm terrorized the poor family and their son, who there was 'no evidence' against him

And then, it all fell apart. The DeVries tape sealed the deal and no matter what any internet nuts think, a normal person who watched the tape, especially a Dutch speaker, knows 100% that Joran is guilty, and that Joran is not and never was a nice boy.

The Van der Sloots victim card has now expired.


This is a post from another person.Just thought in the context of the statement this last line fits the VDS family perfect....


Keepthefaith


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: kkate on March 14, 2008, 12:35:55 PM
Pardon my manners, Good morning.  I stayed home from work because my foot hurts.  I think I'm having a relapse of plantar fasciitis.  Good grief.  The fun just never stops.

Destiny, you have mail.

Oh Peaches I struggle with Plantar, and it's no picnic.  So sorry about your foot pain.

I had cortisone injected in my foot that helped a great deal.

Well, if you have any great hints or anything that's worked for ya, I'd be a willing ear.  It's my right foot too.  My driving foot.  I have pretty good luck with pain meds and rolling a bottle of frozen water with my foot.  But then my foot gets cold and that pisses me off so what's a girl to do.  Great hints to my Peaches rally thread in the Lounge if you please lest I be accused of hijacking this particularly slow thread. 



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: kkate on March 14, 2008, 12:38:27 PM
Pardon my manners, Good morning.  I stayed home from work because my foot hurts.  I think I'm having a relapse of plantar fasciitis.  Good grief.  The fun just never stops.

Destiny, you have mail.

Oh Peaches I struggle with Plantar, and it's no picnic.  So sorry about your foot pain.



Well, if you have any great hints or anything that's worked for ya, I'd be a willing ear.  It's my right foot too.  My driving foot.  I have pretty good luck with pain meds and rolling a bottle of frozen water with my foot.  But then my foot gets cold and that pisses me off so what's a girl to do.  Great hints to my Peaches rally thread in the Lounge if you please lest I be accused of hijacking this particularly slow thread. 

I had cortisone injected in my foot that helped a great deal.
(Sorry...messed up quote & off topic)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: Destiny on March 14, 2008, 12:41:53 PM
Pardon my manners, Good morning.  I stayed home from work because my foot hurts.  I think I'm having a relapse of plantar fasciitis.  Good grief.  The fun just never stops.

Destiny, you have mail.

Just got here Peaches...will check...Thanks!  Soak and elevate that foot Girl...sending healing energy your way...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: Kermit on March 14, 2008, 12:57:46 PM
Hey Destiny,

It is driving me nuts trying to figure out where you are.
I live in GA. I have asked Klaas to forward my email addy to you. We may be neighbors.  ::MonkeyHaHa::

I've been to GA does that count?


Yes! You are now an Honorary Georgia Frog!

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/frog.jpg)

Klaas, you now have citizenship. :lol:


Why thank you Miss Scarlet.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: Kermit on March 14, 2008, 01:02:48 PM
Peaches

IT'S A SIGN!

You're suppose to learn to hop!

 ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: Kermit on March 14, 2008, 01:03:28 PM
Welcome SS

You're probably asleep right now, but I'm posting this welcome message as a subliminal message

 ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: Kermit on March 14, 2008, 01:06:35 PM
Klassend,

NO FAIR! I missed out on the picture of you in GA.

(http://onlineathens.com/images/082706/16279_512.jpg)
Here's my pic in GA, a close up look down a cannon!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: Kermit on March 14, 2008, 01:07:33 PM
Texasmom,

Just wanted to say - That is the way families ALL should be.
Love it!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: Jerry from Ohio on March 14, 2008, 01:08:22 PM
 Howdy Peaches  am sorry about your foot  am sending up prayers for it to just be a small pain that will go away rapidly  .
                   your friend  Jerry   ::MonkeyWink::




Pardon my manners, Good morning.  I stayed home from work because my foot hurts.  I think I'm having a relapse of plantar fasciitis.  Good grief.  The fun just never stops.

Destiny, you have mail.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: Kermit on March 14, 2008, 01:11:02 PM
(http://www.alumni.uga.edu/alumni/images/enews/enews0906/e_kermit4.jpg)

Another pic of me in GA



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: cubbeegirl on March 14, 2008, 01:12:19 PM
Klassend,

NO FAIR! I missed out on the picture of you in GA.

(http://onlineathens.com/images/082706/16279_512.jpg)
Here's my pic in GA, a close up look down a cannon!




Hahahaha!  I missed it too kermit, always lurking, haven't been posting much, just not had much to say.
*******, glad to see that you are back!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: klaasend on March 14, 2008, 01:12:37 PM
Klassend,

NO FAIR! I missed out on the picture of you in GA.

(http://onlineathens.com/images/082706/16279_512.jpg)
Here's my pic in GA, a close up look down a cannon!



ROFLMAO - where did you get that picture, lol  ::MonkeyHaHa::  Took me a couple minutes to figure out what the green part was...ha ha ha


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: Kermit on March 14, 2008, 01:14:40 PM
(http://spf.fotologs.net/photo/15/62/32/iansummers/1146626204_f.jpg)

PrivateEye and I went drinking last night heh heh - He left me in the gutter!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: cubbeegirl on March 14, 2008, 01:15:21 PM
Klassend,

NO FAIR! I missed out on the picture of you in GA.

(http://onlineathens.com/images/082706/16279_512.jpg)
Here's my pic in GA, a close up look down a cannon!



ROFLMAO - where did you get that picture, lol  ::MonkeyHaHa::  Took me a couple minutes to figure out what the green part was...ha ha ha


I thought it was a big, lime green easter egg or something...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: Kermit on March 14, 2008, 01:15:30 PM
Klassend,

NO FAIR! I missed out on the picture of you in GA.

(http://onlineathens.com/images/082706/16279_512.jpg)
Here's my pic in GA, a close up look down a cannon!



ROFLMAO - where did you get that picture, lol  ::MonkeyHaHa::  Took me a couple minutes to figure out what the green part was...ha ha ha


It's me EYES looking down the barrel.

 ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: Kermit on March 14, 2008, 01:16:02 PM
Klassend,

NO FAIR! I missed out on the picture of you in GA.

(http://onlineathens.com/images/082706/16279_512.jpg)
Here's my pic in GA, a close up look down a cannon!



ROFLMAO - where did you get that picture, lol  ::MonkeyHaHa::  Took me a couple minutes to figure out what the green part was...ha ha ha


I thought it was a big, lime green easter egg or something...

LOL - an Easter Egg for a head ROFLMAO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: Kermit on March 14, 2008, 01:17:24 PM
(http://i29.photobucket.com/albums/c260/reynalddelacruz/kermit.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: Peaches on March 14, 2008, 01:18:46 PM
Howdy Peaches  am sorry about your foot  am sending up prayers for it to just be a small pain that will go away rapidly  .
                   your friend  Jerry   ::MonkeyWink::




Pardon my manners, Good morning.  I stayed home from work because my foot hurts.  I think I'm having a relapse of plantar fasciitis.  Good grief.  The fun just never stops.

Destiny, you have mail.

Thank you, Cowboy.  Hope things are going well for you and Miss Jessica.  Always thinking about you two.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: bluwaters on March 14, 2008, 01:20:49 PM
Dr. Hodges and I hung out on the back deck of the Persistence where he took me through the thought-print process and how the human mind works in those regards.  After several hours, my mind felt like "swiss-cheese" (Tot - I like that, I may have to use it).  I had to cut him off midway (after several hours) because I was dehydrated and getting severely sun burnt lol.  We finished inside the cool galley of the Persistence. Dr. Hodges never skipped a beat.  His theories are far outside of my expertise, so I'm in no position to judge them as valid or not.  I hope they're valid for their potential application to other future cases and current cold cases.  As far as the search goes, the theories played no part in the planning or execution of the search.  Regardless, I enjoyed talking with him particularly in terms of our mutual faith in Jesus Christ.
Hi Kyle!
It must have been interesting to talk with Dr. Hodges. I have not read his book, but have read his website. Whew! Outside the box - for sure.
One of the questions that nags at me about his "thought-print" process is if it could possibly be that he can use the words of a suspect and "fit" them to match the crime? I don't know if that makes sense? (http://i92.photobucket.com/albums/l28/TallyAnna/smilies/purplexed.gif)
Anyway, it is really interesting stuff. I can't decide if I should buy the book.
Here's the website:
http://forensicthoughtprints.com/default.aspx

Kyle, have you read either Beth or Dave's books? I have ordered them both and look forward to reading them, although they will be heartbreaking.
I haven't seem a monkey post yet that doesn't highly recommend both books.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: Kermit on March 14, 2008, 01:21:10 PM
(http://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i122/bgecproductions/Kermit/kermit-weekend.jpg)



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: A's Fever on March 14, 2008, 01:28:44 PM
Howdy Peaches  am sorry about your foot  am sending up prayers for it to just be a small pain that will go away rapidly  .
                   your friend  Jerry   ::MonkeyWink::




Pardon my manners, Good morning.  I stayed home from work because my foot hurts.  I think I'm having a relapse of plantar fasciitis.  Good grief.  The fun just never stops.

Destiny, you have mail.

Thank you, Cowboy.  Hope things are going well for you and Miss Jessica.  Always thinking about you two.

Peaches, I just posted a hint for you in your rally thread.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: ldstlou on March 14, 2008, 02:03:03 PM
Howdy Peaches  am sorry about your foot  am sending up prayers for it to just be a small pain that will go away rapidly  .
                   your friend  Jerry   ::MonkeyWink::




Pardon my manners, Good morning.  I stayed home from work because my foot hurts.  I think I'm having a relapse of plantar fasciitis.  Good grief.  The fun just never stops.

Destiny, you have mail.

our prayers go out to you also Peaches. Hope you are feeling better soon!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: ldstlou on March 14, 2008, 02:06:04 PM
(http://spf.fotologs.net/photo/15/62/32/iansummers/1146626204_f.jpg)

PrivateEye and I went drinking last night heh heh - He left me in the gutter!



that is too darned funny!!!
Shame on you PI!!!! Could have at least gotten Kermi off of the street!!! lol


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: jackb on March 14, 2008, 02:34:56 PM
I mentioned this earlier and some Dutch posters recommended we add some posts to his blog.  Maybe if we have enough people ask him, we could get him to do a show AND start posting here....  So a bunch of need to hit his blog up about it.   And I'm sure he would appreciate a place to stay then next visit to the US ;)

He's not allowed in the US due to his criminal background/time in jail.  Remember, immigration sent him back to the NL when he tried to enter with DeVries.

Crap, that's right.  You know, it's a shame.  We all have skeleton's in our closets, some maybe worse than others, but he has redeemed himself and it was years aog.  He did the US a big favor and I don't see him being a threat to anybody.  Oh well,  I would still love to get him to post here.  It's worth a shot to try.... ;)
::MonkeyShocked::   

Wonder why they won't let him in Posner goes and comes at will.  Who said, that is a position too, that he cannot?  Probably some skank temp who works when no one else will.  In fact, he should move here to the US.  He is better than some of the politicals leftists in integrity and even some of the rightest extremes.  Patrick has guts and integrity, it seems.   I could be wrong, but he might make a good American citizen.   Jack blue


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: Dihannah1 on March 14, 2008, 02:50:58 PM
I found this earlier.I find it disturbing and sure wish our people could find her and have alittle talk..Read her comments on page 4..

http://youtube.com/watch?v=yc9j1kGxyoo

BelleVK (1 month ago)
i didn't have a crush on him, TheHardProblem, imma hates his gutz. he did something to a girl friend of mine, weeks before natalee.

it's him and that satish and deepak.. they did stuff to natalee, later they cleaned the car like mad monkeys and a boat dropped the body in da ocean.

police knows it, says it cannot be confirmed by other sources..

Oh my!  That is truly eery!  I hope somebody can translate some of those comments,  if they haven't yet.  I guess I should read ahead....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: Blue Moon on March 14, 2008, 02:57:14 PM
(http://spf.fotologs.net/photo/15/62/32/iansummers/1146626204_f.jpg)

PrivateEye and I went drinking last night heh heh - He left me in the gutter!



You don't look too good there my little green friend ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyHaHa::
This is a RIOT.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: Dihannah1 on March 14, 2008, 03:03:40 PM
Somebody supposedly recording a phone call with Joran!   ::MonkeyShocked:: Sounds like him too. Has this been posted?   Need some translations here!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fBdzhkNhzIE&NR=1

All comments appear to be dutch too.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: klaasend on March 14, 2008, 03:06:44 PM
NEW FRONT PAGE POST:

http://scaredmonkeys.com/2008/03/14/dutch-to-legalize-gay-sex-in-public-park-but-fine-dog-owners-with-unleashed-pets-%e2%80%a6-what-are-they-thinking-in-the-netherlands/

Dutch to Legalize Gay Sex in Public Park but Fine Dog Owners with Unleashed Pets … What are they thinking in The Netherlands?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: klaasend on March 14, 2008, 03:10:17 PM
Somebody supposedly recording a phone call with Joran!   ::MonkeyShocked:: Sounds like him too. Has this been posted?   Need some translations here!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fBdzhkNhzIE&NR=1

All comments appear to be dutch too.


Yes, that probably was Joran right after the DeVries show aired but it's over a month ago.  I suspect the conversation was probably translated back then. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: Jerry from Ohio on March 14, 2008, 03:24:15 PM

  Oh my good Lord Klaas this cannot be a real law can it ?
  I find it very hard to believe that the WHOLE flipping is totally whacked out ?  ::MonkeyConfused::
  The island of Aruba and the NL are a Psychologist's dream or nightmare if you prefer.
   Jerry from Ohio    ::MonkeyLaugh::



NEW FRONT PAGE POST:

http://scaredmonkeys.com/2008/03/14/dutch-to-legalize-gay-sex-in-public-park-but-fine-dog-owners-with-unleashed-pets-%e2%80%a6-what-are-they-thinking-in-the-netherlands/

Dutch to Legalize Gay Sex in Public Park but Fine Dog Owners with Unleashed Pets … What are they thinking in The Netherlands?



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: klaasend on March 14, 2008, 03:30:28 PM

  Oh my good Lord Klaas this cannot be a real law can it ?
  I find it very hard to believe that the WHOLE flipping is totally whacked out ?  ::MonkeyConfused::
  The island of Aruba and the NL are a Psychologist's dream or nightmare if you prefer.
   Jerry from Ohio    ::MonkeyLaugh::



NEW FRONT PAGE POST:

http://scaredmonkeys.com/2008/03/14/dutch-to-legalize-gay-sex-in-public-park-but-fine-dog-owners-with-unleashed-pets-%e2%80%a6-what-are-they-thinking-in-the-netherlands/

Dutch to Legalize Gay Sex in Public Park but Fine Dog Owners with Unleashed Pets … What are they thinking in The Netherlands?


Personally I don't want to see ANY sex in a public park gay or otherwise.  I'd much rather watch a dog roam free although I understand leash laws.  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: Magnolia on March 14, 2008, 03:41:39 PM
(http://spf.fotologs.net/photo/15/62/32/iansummers/1146626204_f.jpg)

PrivateEye and I went drinking last night heh heh - He left me in the gutter!



My dog, Harry, had a Kermit that he loved and played with all the time.
Unfortunately it looked about like Kermit in the gutter.
My oldest grandson went for a preschool interview.  They had a Kermit
at the preschool.  Grandson said:  Hey, look it has eyes.
Teacher said:  What do you mean they all have eyes.
Grandson said:  Not at my Granny's they don't.
We had to search for another preschool.
 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: LoRain on March 14, 2008, 03:49:31 PM
 anyone remember not to long ago there was a post on the FP or somewhere's that told a story of how Deepak and Joran waded out to the boat with Natalee and put her in the boat and the poster even said something like they had to cut her some to get Her to fit in the crab trap....sorry I can't remember the exact details...but it seems to fit the story now......   


Was that the same post that claimed to be related to the Kalpoes and they mentioned buoy numbers?
 
 Report to moderator    Logged 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Character is doing the right thing even when no one is watching."
 
 
Dayhiker
Scared Monkey

 Offline

Posts: 2586



   Re: Natalee Case Discussion #719 2/02
« Reply #393 on: February 02, 2008, 10:12:26 PM » 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote from: hotping on February 02, 2008, 10:10:20 PM
Does anyone remember not to long ago there was a post on the FP or somewhere's that told a story of how Deepak and Joran waded out to the boat with Natalee and put her in the boat and the poster even said something like they had to cut her some to get Her to fit in the crab trap....sorry I can't remember the exact details...but it seems to fit the story now......   



Was that the guy who called out the bouy numbers? I do remember that post, Ping.
 
 Report to moderator    Logged 
 
 
 ****I'm sure this isn't the topic being discussed at the moment but I would like to know if anyone ever remembered anything about the above posts...I am very interested in buoy numbers and need to get all the info I can so I can put it to rest...anyone that can help....please and thank you in advance....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: klaasend on March 14, 2008, 03:55:51 PM
LoRain - here is the front page post I believe you are referring to.  FYI this person is posting from the USA northeast area:

Guest wrote:

They went for a romantic stroll on the moon lit beach, he in a drunken panic, her in a drugged out, passed out state. She fell and hit her head on ‘the floor’ (on the floor of the car perhaps as opposed to ‘the ground’?)He carried her in his arms, he took off his shoes and they both went into the water - not for a swim, they just “went into the water” so he could wash off her DNA from him, and his DNA from her. Was this water the ocean water by the sandy hotel strip, or by the lighthouse, or by the shark feeding area, or some murky pond water? Did ‘going into the water’ cause her to drown? He left her somewhere to ’sleep’ - he says on the beach which is near the water, but MARY NEVER HEARD THE BOUY TOLL…she never woke up from where ever he left her. He walked home barefoot. Either his shoes got stuck in the sludgy, murky waters, or they were used with his brown square holed belt together with the missing trap…How could such evil live inside of him.

Make it right K2bros - YOU KNOW WHAT HAPPENED IN THE BACK SEAT OF YOUR CAR THAT NIGHT. You know where you dropped Joran off with a passed out Natalee that night. YOU KNOW WHY YOU WERE CLEANING YOUR CAR THAT NIGHT! YOU KNOW WHY PAULUS RESEARCHED DRUGS AND ALCOHOL THAT NIGHT!

SATISH - 6/11/2005 STATEMENT
“…When I woke up I asked my brother if he knew how Joran had made it to his house. My brother told me that he had been called during the night hours by Joran. My brother told me that when he was talking to Joran, he could hear that Joran was breathing heavily. My brother told me that had asked Joran what he was doing at the time. Joran had told my brother that he was at that time walking home towards his house. My brother told me that he had asked Joran about the girl and that Joran had told him that he had left the girl at the beach. According to my brother Joran had told him that he had taken off his shoes and that he and the girl had gone into the water. Joran had then told my brother that after that he and the girl had gotten out of the water and that the girl had fallen asleep on the beach (DID HE DROWN HER IN THE WATER?). Joran told my brother that he had then tried to wake up the girl but that she had not awakened. Joran told my brother that he had looked to find his shoes but that he couldn’t find them. Joran told my brother that he had left the girl on the beach and that he had walked home barefoot…”



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: klaasend on March 14, 2008, 03:58:36 PM
I think the post that Hotping is referring to was posted either on Michelle's boycott site or the JoranBlog site.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: hotping on March 14, 2008, 04:04:31 PM
I think the post that Hotping is referring to was posted either on Michelle's boycott site or the JoranBlog site.
This is the one I was referring to....

Left on a blog called    Joranvandersloot.com, in the comments........................

8:41 pm  anonymous said...
It was high tide and sea water covering the beach slope, Koen's boat stayed out at a distance in the water and he didn't want the boat got stuck in the beach sand dunes. Joran didn't want his shoes get wet and he took them off. He and Deepak together carried Natalee's body and walking through the water towards Koen's boat where Koen kept the boat's motor running and positioning, it was high tide and high wind, the sea waves were strong and rough. For some unknown reasons Joran got some blood into his shoes when the suspects were trying to fit Natalee's body into the
crap cage. They might have to do some cuttings of the body in order to get all the body parts into the cage. The cage was not a coffin shape, it was square in shape, not long enough to fit a body of 5'4. So Joran put his bloody shoes into the square crab cage as well. Together the suspects dropped cage to the deepsea bottom and got rid of the forensic evidence.[b/] If Tim Miller can locate the crab cage, Joran's shoes are there. Joran is the murderer.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: wreck on March 14, 2008, 04:05:05 PM
(http://spf.fotologs.net/photo/15/62/32/iansummers/1146626204_f.jpg)

PrivateEye and I went drinking last night heh heh - He left me in the gutter!



My dog, Harry, had a Kermit that he loved and played with all the time.
Unfortunately it looked about like Kermit in the gutter.
My oldest grandson went for a preschool interview.  They had a Kermit
at the preschool.  Grandson said:  Hey, look it has eyes.
Teacher said:  What do you mean they all have eyes.
Grandson said:  Not at my Granny's they don't.
We had to search for another preschool.
 ::MonkeyHaHa::
So they are all for Joran being in the park -- he just has to remain on a leash.  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: wreck on March 14, 2008, 04:06:37 PM
NEW FRONT PAGE POST:

http://scaredmonkeys.com/2008/03/14/dutch-to-legalize-gay-sex-in-public-park-but-fine-dog-owners-with-unleashed-pets-%e2%80%a6-what-are-they-thinking-in-the-netherlands/

Dutch to Legalize Gay Sex in Public Park but Fine Dog Owners with Unleashed Pets … What are they thinking in The Netherlands?

oops -- wrong post referred to !! (sorry Kermit!!)

So they are all for Joran being in the park -- he just has to remain on a leash.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: LoRain on March 14, 2008, 04:10:47 PM


THANK YOU very much for the posts....if you remember or know of anything else please let me know...again thank you!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: hotping on March 14, 2008, 04:19:56 PM


THANK YOU very much for the posts....if you remember or know of anything else please let me know...again thank you!!
YW!  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: Tater on March 14, 2008, 04:23:35 PM
I think the post that Hotping is referring to was posted either on Michelle's boycott site or the JoranBlog site.
This is the one I was referring to....

Left on a blog called    Joranvandersloot.com, in the comments........................

8:41 pm  anonymous said...
It was high tide and sea water covering the beach slope, Koen's boat stayed out at a distance in the water and he didn't want the boat got stuck in the beach sand dunes. Joran didn't want his shoes get wet and he took them off. He and Deepak together carried Natalee's body and walking through the water towards Koen's boat where Koen kept the boat's motor running and positioning, it was high tide and high wind, the sea waves were strong and rough. For some unknown reasons Joran got some blood into his shoes when the suspects were trying to fit Natalee's body into the
crap cage. They might have to do some cuttings of the body in order to get all the body parts into the cage. The cage was not a coffin shape, it was square in shape, not long enough to fit a body of 5'4. So Joran put his bloody shoes into the square crab cage as well. Together the suspects dropped cage to the deepsea bottom and got rid of the forensic evidence.[b/] If Tim Miller can locate the crab cage, Joran's shoes are there. Joran is the murderer.

Weird how this sounds like the truth to me...I think Koen has always been the ticking time bomb..  :smt073


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: caesu on March 14, 2008, 04:32:42 PM
http://patrickvandereem.nl/

you probably already seen this but patrick put a link to SM on his blog


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: katrien on March 14, 2008, 04:33:58 PM

  Oh my good Lord Klaas this cannot be a real law can it ?
  I find it very hard to believe that the WHOLE flipping is totally whacked out ?  ::MonkeyConfused::
  The island of Aruba and the NL are a Psychologist's dream or nightmare if you prefer.
   Jerry from Ohio    ::MonkeyLaugh::



NEW FRONT PAGE POST:

http://scaredmonkeys.com/2008/03/14/dutch-to-legalize-gay-sex-in-public-park-but-fine-dog-owners-with-unleashed-pets-%e2%80%a6-what-are-they-thinking-in-the-netherlands/

Dutch to Legalize Gay Sex in Public Park but Fine Dog Owners with Unleashed Pets … What are they thinking in The Netherlands?


I is not a very bad idea to find out more about his first before making a fool of the Dutch.

I personnaly think it is rather silly to dissolve riddle sent bij anonymous posters.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: hotping on March 14, 2008, 04:37:00 PM
I think the post that Hotping is referring to was posted either on Michelle's boycott site or the JoranBlog site.
This is the one I was referring to....

Left on a blog called    Joranvandersloot.com, in the comments........................

8:41 pm  anonymous said...
It was high tide and sea water covering the beach slope, Koen's boat stayed out at a distance in the water and he didn't want the boat got stuck in the beach sand dunes. Joran didn't want his shoes get wet and he took them off. He and Deepak together carried Natalee's body and walking through the water towards Koen's boat where Koen kept the boat's motor running and positioning, it was high tide and high wind, the sea waves were strong and rough. For some unknown reasons Joran got some blood into his shoes when the suspects were trying to fit Natalee's body into the
crap cage. They might have to do some cuttings of the body in order to get all the body parts into the cage. The cage was not a coffin shape, it was square in shape, not long enough to fit a body of 5'4. So Joran put his bloody shoes into the square crab cage as well. Together the suspects dropped cage to the deepsea bottom and got rid of the forensic evidence.[b/] If Tim Miller can locate the crab cage, Joran's shoes are there. Joran is the murderer.

Weird how this sounds like the truth to me...I think Koen has always been the ticking time bomb..  :smt073
It certainly could be very close to the truth....I just wonder when they did it...of course if it is the truth....I don't have Dave's book right now..DIL borrowed it and I haven't gotten it back yet....Does anyone remember the date that Dave first saw the boat being cleaned at Koen's house?  ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: Tater on March 14, 2008, 04:42:11 PM

  Oh my good Lord Klaas this cannot be a real law can it ?
  I find it very hard to believe that the WHOLE flipping is totally whacked out ?  ::MonkeyConfused::
  The island of Aruba and the NL are a Psychologist's dream or nightmare if you prefer.
   Jerry from Ohio    ::MonkeyLaugh::



NEW FRONT PAGE POST:

http://scaredmonkeys.com/2008/03/14/dutch-to-legalize-gay-sex-in-public-park-but-fine-dog-owners-with-unleashed-pets-%e2%80%a6-what-are-they-thinking-in-the-netherlands/

Dutch to Legalize Gay Sex in Public Park but Fine Dog Owners with Unleashed Pets … What are they thinking in The Netherlands?


I is not a very bad idea to find out more about his first before making a fool of the Dutch.

I personnaly think it is rather silly to dissolve riddle sent bij anonymous posters.


Be assured sweet katrien that I wasn't going to say a word about it in consideration of our Dutch friends here..
(http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2004-10/867511/calin.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: Tater on March 14, 2008, 04:52:59 PM
For Kermit..

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v17/onlyndreams/Smilies/sar-frog3.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: caesu on March 14, 2008, 04:54:38 PM

  Oh my good Lord Klaas this cannot be a real law can it ?
  I find it very hard to believe that the WHOLE flipping is totally whacked out ?  ::MonkeyConfused::
  The island of Aruba and the NL are a Psychologist's dream or nightmare if you prefer.
   Jerry from Ohio    ::MonkeyLaugh::



NEW FRONT PAGE POST:

http://scaredmonkeys.com/2008/03/14/dutch-to-legalize-gay-sex-in-public-park-but-fine-dog-owners-with-unleashed-pets-%e2%80%a6-what-are-they-thinking-in-the-netherlands/

Dutch to Legalize Gay Sex in Public Park but Fine Dog Owners with Unleashed Pets … What are they thinking in The Netherlands?


I is not a very bad idea to find out more about his first before making a fool of the Dutch.

I personnaly think it is rather silly to dissolve riddle sent bij anonymous posters.

i personally hate dog shit more.
if they stay hidden in the bushes, not on the walkpaths and don't leave condoms lying around it is fine by me.

funny how this local amsterdam news gets international attention.
it fits nicely into to the caricature made of the dutch so not really surprising.
if some news doesn't fit into that it won't be picked up.  ::MonkeyHaHa::

http://www.volkskrant.nl/binnenland/article512871.ece/Politie_grijpt_in_bij_klachten_cruisen_in_Vondelpark
the police will act of they get complaints or laws are violated.
but media is too lazy too report this if it doesn't fit in the caricature.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: jackb on March 14, 2008, 05:06:23 PM
Hey Destiny,

It is driving me nuts trying to figure out where you are.
I live in GA. I have asked Klaas to forward my email addy to you. We may be neighbors.  ::MonkeyHaHa::

I've been to GA does that count?


I've been to GA 3 times, does that count  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Well Dang Klaas...that makes you and honorary *BUBBETTE*...LOL!...the dudes are bubbas...

Been to Georgia a few times.  Right now in NC, in SC for 8 mos.  Guess I am somewhat a bubba too.  Lived in CA (Anaheim, Santa Ana, and Orange.  Anaheim about 3 yrs.)  That really makes me Southern.  A surfin' Bubba.  Of course there is Missouri, Kansas, Tennessee, MD, Washington and Virginia to consider.  Got a good cross breeding.  This was in my adult years.  LOL  Jack blue


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: jackb on March 14, 2008, 05:10:53 PM
Back up for a couple minutes
My Hubby Says Good Looking Lady and I Agree! Thanks Klaas!  ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyCool::

Remind your husband that photo was taken 39 years ago  ::MonkeyWink::
  I want to see your photo, Klass.  jack b


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: Nut44x4 on March 14, 2008, 05:12:20 PM
anyone remember not to long ago there was a post on the FP or somewhere's that told a story of how Deepak and Joran waded out to the boat with Natalee and put her in the boat and the poster even said something like they had to cut her some to get Her to fit in the crab trap....sorry I can't remember the exact details...but it seems to fit the story now......   


Was that the same post that claimed to be related to the Kalpoes and they mentioned buoy numbers?
 
 Report to moderator    Logged 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Character is doing the right thing even when no one is watching."
 
 
Dayhiker
Scared Monkey

 Offline

Posts: 2586



   Re: Natalee Case Discussion #719 2/02
« Reply #393 on: February 02, 2008, 10:12:26 PM » 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote from: hotping on February 02, 2008, 10:10:20 PM
Does anyone remember not to long ago there was a post on the FP or somewhere's that told a story of how Deepak and Joran waded out to the boat with Natalee and put her in the boat and the poster even said something like they had to cut her some to get Her to fit in the crab trap....sorry I can't remember the exact details...but it seems to fit the story now......   



Was that the guy who called out the bouy numbers? I do remember that post, Ping.
 
 Report to moderator    Logged 
 
 
 ****I'm sure this isn't the topic being discussed at the moment but I would like to know if anyone ever remembered anything about the above posts...I am very interested in buoy numbers and need to get all the info I can so I can put it to rest...anyone that can help....please and thank you in advance....



I remember it around August of last year...a specific buoy# was mentioned. Looking for it now. Will post it in the new thread when I locate.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: jackb on March 14, 2008, 05:17:25 PM
it doesn't really matter. but this it the Roosenburg building:

click (http://maps.google.nl/maps?f=q&hl=nl&geocode=sll=52.469397,6.685181&sspn=2.365899,5.141602&ie=UTF8&ll=52.148856,5.246937&spn=0.009309,0.020084&t=h&z=16)

(http://i25.tinypic.com/34fcp06.png)

i figured that out from this contractor-site:
http://www.lagerwaardarchitect.nl/project.php?id=18&image=6&category=1
they planned to build something on top of the existing building. for long-stay patients.
 

Anyone got a turd bomb from a terraydactyl laying around they don't need.  Got an ideal.  Jack b


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: Nut44x4 on March 14, 2008, 05:17:58 PM
anyone remember not to long ago there was a post on the FP or somewhere's that told a story of how Deepak and Joran waded out to the boat with Natalee and put her in the boat and the poster even said something like they had to cut her some to get Her to fit in the crab trap....sorry I can't remember the exact details...but it seems to fit the story now......   


Was that the same post that claimed to be related to the Kalpoes and they mentioned buoy numbers?
 
 Report to moderator    Logged 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Character is doing the right thing even when no one is watching."
 
 
Dayhiker
Scared Monkey

 Offline

Posts: 2586



   Re: Natalee Case Discussion #719 2/02
« Reply #393 on: February 02, 2008, 10:12:26 PM » 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote from: hotping on February 02, 2008, 10:10:20 PM
Does anyone remember not to long ago there was a post on the FP or somewhere's that told a story of how Deepak and Joran waded out to the boat with Natalee and put her in the boat and the poster even said something like they had to cut her some to get Her to fit in the crab trap....sorry I can't remember the exact details...but it seems to fit the story now......   



Was that the guy who called out the bouy numbers? I do remember that post, Ping.
 
 Report to moderator    Logged 
 
 
 ****I'm sure this isn't the topic being discussed at the moment but I would like to know if anyone ever remembered anything about the above posts...I am very interested in buoy numbers and need to get all the info I can so I can put it to rest...anyone that can help....please and thank you in advance....



Are we going to the next thread?? I can't get in....grrrrrr.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: hotping on March 14, 2008, 05:19:22 PM
Looks like our mods are absent at the moment....I'm sure they'll be here soon...  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: jackb on March 14, 2008, 05:21:25 PM
it doesn't really matter. but this it the Roosenburg building:

click (http://maps.google.nl/maps?f=q&hl=nl&geocode=sll=52.469397,6.685181&sspn=2.365899,5.141602&ie=UTF8&ll=52.148856,5.246937&spn=0.009309,0.020084&t=h&z=16)

(http://i25.tinypic.com/34fcp06.png)

i figured that out from this contractor-site:
http://www.lagerwaardarchitect.nl/project.php?id=18&image=6&category=1
they planned to build something on top of the existing building. for long-stay patients.
 

Maybe they will build another C&C for Joran pickups and a gambling casino.  Jack b


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: Tater on March 14, 2008, 05:21:33 PM
Looks like our mods are absent at the moment....I'm sure they'll be here soon...  ::MonkeyWink::

Let's Party!!!!

(http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2004-10/867511/bootsdance-2.gif)     


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: hotping on March 14, 2008, 05:25:58 PM
TOT That is just to cute! Usually We don't get to party until late at night....I wonder where the mods are.....Oh Well....Let's Party... :smt035 :smt041


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: downloadingdaddy on March 14, 2008, 05:26:39 PM
Looks like our mods are absent at the moment....I'm sure they'll be here soon...  ::MonkeyWink::

Let's Party!!!!

(http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2004-10/867511/bootsdance-2.gif)     
Monkeydance time!  ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: jackb on March 14, 2008, 05:29:04 PM
Deleted now  ::MonkeyCool::

Well, this teaches me not to go to bed early!!!

Welcome SS and 3doglady!  (http://i92.photobucket.com/albums/l28/TallyAnna/smilies/welcome2.gif)

If Joran is indeed in a psychiatric hospital, he will only stay as long as he feels it is safe to go out again.

I love Patrick's website! He links to SM and BFN!  ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

They better keep him forever or he will get out and repeat, perhaps kill some of his family members or their children one day.  I bet he made life a living hell for the ones in his family who are not evil as he is.  What about going to school with a bully who is 6 ft. 5 inches whose mother teaches there and his father a judge.  I bet he terrorized both teachers and students.  He needs to be kept away from people who are not willing to kill him to defend themselves, and it is rare a parent will do that before getting killed.  For all I know, his parents need to go themselves.  The children in that family were probably terrified living in the house and so close to him.  He is a menace to society.        Jack blue


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: caesu on March 14, 2008, 05:30:27 PM
http://antilliaans.caribiana.nl/aruba/car20080314_uitspraak-eman

(about AVP corruption case)

Quote
Prosecution not a political process.

OM is considering an appeal.

Hans Mos is glad the judge made clear the OM didn't prosecute because of pressure from justice minister Rudy Croes (MEP), a political opponent of the suspected AVP-politicians.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: hotping on March 14, 2008, 05:30:28 PM
Well I'm out of here for a while....so...party hardy....IBBL... ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: Tater on March 14, 2008, 05:30:40 PM
TOT That is just to cute! Usually We don't get to party until late at night....I wonder where the mods are.....Oh Well....Let's Party... :smt035 :smt041

(http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2004-10/867511/SmileyDancer.gif)  (http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2004-10/867511/bootsdance-2.gif)

 Let's go!!!! ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on March 14, 2008, 05:34:53 PM


The commitment would be for a period of 1 or 2 years. Unless of course on Aruba new indications are discovered that would lead to Joran changing his Dutch "cell" for an Aruban one.

Oh bull caca.IF joran is in there then I would have to say that this is the only way the arubans can possibly go forward and end this case without bringing out the obvious coverup and corruption in this case.I think we all know dang well joran would never volunteer to go into a mental hospital(HE doesn't think there's anything wrong with HIM)so if he is there it was a deal worked out between his parents and the aruban so called justice department.Maybe they gave the van der ditches a choice"put your monster son in a mental ward(when he gets out we will try him in court and he can claim the insanity defense,time served,and our precious tourism and corruptions will go on) or we will be forced to take care of him and his big mouth". ::MonkeyNoNo::


I suspect the same Karma. This (if true) gets hims out of Hans Mos' hair, gives him an insanity defense so they won't have to prosecute him. Pinhead Hans had the case all buttoned up and closed until Joran's confession. He and Dop were ready for holiday but Joran made them re-open the case.
It's just dang sickening DayHiker.....they think we are all idiots.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
Post by: klaasend on March 14, 2008, 05:35:50 PM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/1LOCKED.gif)

Please move to NCD# 743


http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2705.0