Scared Monkeys Discussion Forum

Natalee Holloway => Natalee Holloway => Topic started by: jackb on May 18, 2008, 07:31:11 PM



Title: Picture Dispute
Post by: jackb on May 18, 2008, 07:31:11 PM
Thank You Rob, your right.

You would have no "fox news" pictures showing material if it was not for me.  As for whomever is taking credit.  Time will show you are wrong.  Fox news or whoever sent the originals to this outfit had the goodies blocked out until they were deal with by me.  How?  That will be revealed in time, as well.  I do have the proof.  The first pic, and only picture out was given to someone on the blog as a test to see where it would go and it went straight to the Enquirer paper, for a fee I am sure.  I wanted that particular picture out or I would never have sent it.  Things were dragging.  It lit a small spark.  There is a "private investigator," a woman, who tried to take credit for the work, but still does not know how it was done, as I never included that because I am sure had I done so, it would have been circumvented by those who have an interest (for whatever reason) for doing so.  No, I do not need anyone's approval for what I do.  I do this for the reason that I choose to.  That is the only reason.  I have not made a big play out of it because it would not serve any purpose other than (at this time) hurt others.  My work.  My timing.    Jack blue 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #752 5-15-08
Post by: Blonde on May 18, 2008, 07:43:04 PM
You would have no "fox news" pictures showing material if it was not for me.  As for whomever is taking credit.  Time will show you are wrong.  Fox news or whoever sent the originals to this outfit had the goodies blocked out until they were deal with by me.  How?  That will be revealed in time, as well.  I do have the proof.  The first pic, and only picture out was given to someone on the blog as a test to see where it would go and it went straight to the Enquirer paper, for a fee I am sure.  I wanted that particular picture out or I would never have sent it.  Things were dragging.  It lit a small spark.  There is a "private investigator," a woman, who tried to take credit for the work, but still does not know how it was done, as I never included that because I am sure had I done so, it would have been circumvented by those who have an interest (for whatever reason) for doing so.  No, I do not need anyone's approval for what I do.  I do this for the reason that I choose to.  That is the only reason.  I have not made a big play out of it because it would not serve any purpose other than (at this time) hurt others.  My work.  My timing.    Jack blue 


JackB I never saw your so called pictures.
I worked on my own pictures and sent them to the FBI two years ago.I HAVE BACK UP as to what posters were with me when this all went down .  Thabt was my picture in the NE I have the proof.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #752 5-15-08
Post by: finngirl on May 18, 2008, 07:51:24 PM

ah, but your ego is still fully inflated, little man  :wink:



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #752 5-15-08
Post by: hotping on May 18, 2008, 07:53:28 PM
Thank You San...I'm really  tired of hearing about the pics...They definitely need Their on Thread to post in....No offense guys but I'm sure there are alot of Monkeys that are tired of hearing it.....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #752 5-15-08
Post by: finngirl on May 18, 2008, 07:57:30 PM
I see that there is a dispute over certain picture/pictures.  And I could see the tension is getting high.  I don't usually say anything but could we take the disagreement out of the NH thread.  Could you start a new thread and continue your dispute.

If you need me to start the new thread I will gladly do so.  TIA.


yes, please! :::w/ glee:::
could we call it the "shooting fish in a barrel" thread ... ?

cuz getting the best of JB is soooooo easy  :cool:

San: TIA





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #752 5-15-08
Post by: friend of monkeys on May 18, 2008, 07:59:38 PM
Thank You San...I'm really  tired of hearing about the pics...They definitely need Their on Thread to post in....No offense guys but I'm sure there are alot of Monkeys that are tired of hearing it.....

i agree.   the arguing and anger should be placed elsewhere for those who choose to participate in it.  Or set aside entirely.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #752 5-15-08
Post by: finngirl on May 18, 2008, 08:01:06 PM
hey JB:

have to leave for a few hours
but will surely be back to play later

  :salut:



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #752 5-15-08
Post by: jackb on May 18, 2008, 08:03:48 PM
You would have no "fox news" pictures showing material if it was not for me.  As for whomever is taking credit.  Time will show you are wrong.  Fox news or whoever sent the originals to this outfit had the goodies blocked out until they were deal with by me.  How?  That will be revealed in time, as well.  I do have the proof.  The first pic, and only picture out was given to someone on the blog as a test to see where it would go and it went straight to the Enquirer paper, for a fee I am sure.  I wanted that particular picture out or I would never have sent it.  Things were dragging.  It lit a small spark.  There is a "private investigator," a woman, who tried to take credit for the work, but still does not know how it was done, as I never included that because I am sure had I done so, it would have been circumvented by those who have an interest (for whatever reason) for doing so.  No, I do not need anyone's approval for what I do.  I do this for the reason that I choose to.  That is the only reason.  I have not made a big play out of it because it would not serve any purpose other than (at this time) hurt others.  My work.  My timing.    Jack blue 


JackB I never saw your so called pictures.
I worked on my own pictures and sent them to the FBI two years ago.I HAVE BACK UP as to what posters were with me when this all went down .  Thabt was my picture in the NE I have the proof.


You sold out.  I knew it was you.  You got the pic from someone I sent it to and I can prove that.  There is a blog administrator who knows who fixed that picture to seeable long before you sold it.  That is the only picture I gave to anyone outside of a blog Admin., so I do not care what you all did with it, as it was a test and only a test and used to keep the spark going.  Funny, you have not produced any more, nor do you know how it is done.  Also it served the purpose I wanted it too.  As for the rest, you will never get your little paws on them until the evidence calls for it.  If they cannot put it together enough to need this, then I guess they will just stay where they are.   You have been goading me with the help of your alter ego here so you can cop some more and get a few bucks out of them.  No, girlie, you wont.  My time; my dime.    jackb


Title: Re: Picture Dispute
Post by: Rob on May 18, 2008, 10:09:48 PM
>>>...:::yawn:::...<<<

this thread blows



Title: Re: Picture Dispute
Post by: hotping on May 19, 2008, 02:42:36 AM
ROB....LMAO!  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Picture Dispute
Post by: finngirl on May 19, 2008, 02:46:11 AM

what's become tiresome for many is repeatedly reading:
I see this/you can't and I know this/you don't

and when posters IN ALL SINCERITY have said:
wow, that sounds interesting ...
I'd like to see more/know more, please share ...
what they get are rambling non-justifications,
along w/ personal insults and veiled/sometimes direct threats

ie: I can destroy your operating system so don't mess w/ me
(in shango/simian thread)

if someone can't/won't share what they "have" ...
THEN WHY MENTION IT again and again?


attention?

well, you're getting attention now, LOL

what's amusing is that the underlying anger/bitterness,
the efforts to intimidate others while presenting oneself
as possessing superior power/knowledge
come off as laughable

small people stand on others,
thinking that it makes them larger

BTW: finn = finnish extraction/finland ...
not associated w/ wooden shoes AFAIK

that was a fairly weak attempt
so back to psychology class for you, JB,
and pay attention next time!



Title: Re: Picture Dispute
Post by: jackb on May 19, 2008, 03:09:58 AM

what's become tiresome for many is repeatedly reading:
I see this/you can't and I know this/you don't

and when posters IN ALL SINCERITY have said:
wow, that sounds interesting ...
I'd like to see more/know more, please share ...
what they get are rambling non-justifications,
along w/ personal insults and veiled/sometimes direct threats

ie: I can destroy your operating system so don't mess w/ me
(in shango/simian thread)

if someone can't/won't share what they "have" ...
THEN WHY MENTION IT again and again?


attention?

well, you're getting attention now, LOL

what's amusing is that the underlying anger/bitterness,
the efforts to intimidate others while presenting oneself
as possessing superior power/knowledge
come off as laughable

small people stand on others,
thinking that it makes them larger

BTW: finn = finnish extraction/finland ...
not associated w/ wooden shoes AFAIK

that was a fairly weak attempt
so back to psychology class for you, JB,
and pay attention next time!



Doncha just wish you was an American?  Just about kills ya don't it?
Just eats at cha don't it?  Well, live with it.  You know.  Get used to it.  You have lived with it this long.  Keep on with it and be the best you can be at what you are.  LOL  As for my posts.  Seems like you keep with with a few of us "loyals" pretty well, and then make up the rest.  Just remember:  The big ol eye in the sky is on you and yours.  Just think, you are rubbing shoulders with Americans.  LOL

Jack, (an AMERICAN) 


Title: Re: Picture Dispute
Post by: finngirl on May 19, 2008, 03:28:17 AM

when/where did I say I was not an american?

you can't possibly be US Navy ...
they have standards, intelligence-wise

finnish extraction =
heritage/lineage/family tree

2nd generation american on one side,
since before the Civil War on the other side

LOL

"As for my posts. Seems like you keep with with a few of us "loyals" pretty well, and then make up the rest."

there is no need to make up anything re your posts ...
the anger/bitterness is online for all to see

"Just remember: The big ol eye in the sky is on you and yours."

ah, good, the threats are beginning

"Just think, you are rubbing shoulders with Americans."

and you are rubbing shoulders w/ normal/sane people
   
how's your blood pressure?
just checked mine: 106/64



Title: Re: Picture Dispute
Post by: finngirl on May 19, 2008, 03:59:07 AM

forgot this in my last post:

Doncha just wish you was an American? Just about kills ya don't it? Just eats at cha don't it? Well, live with it. You know. Get used to it. You have lived with it this long. Keep on with it and be the best you can be at what you are.  LOL ... Just think, you are rubbing shoulders with Americans.  LOL

Jack, (an AMERICAN)

I'm proud to be an american but I'm not arrogant about it ...
I am humbled by the blessing of my birthright
which is nothing more than the luck of the draw

another difference between us  :wink:




Title: Re: Picture Dispute
Post by: jackb on May 19, 2008, 06:23:22 AM

forgot this in my last post:

Doncha just wish you was an American? Just about kills ya don't it? Just eats at cha don't it? Well, live with it. You know. Get used to it. You have lived with it this long. Keep on with it and be the best you can be at what you are.  LOL ... Just think, you are rubbing shoulders with Americans.  LOL

Jack, (an AMERICAN)

I'm proud to be an american but I'm not arrogant about it ...
I am humbled by the blessing of my birthright
which is nothing more than the luck of the draw

another difference between us  :wink:




No, you are not American.  Of course you cannot help it.  No one holds that against you, but those videos you do on the side????
Now that is pure FinGal.  Just pure unadultrated gar baage.   


Title: Re: Picture Dispute
Post by: Blonde on May 19, 2008, 08:50:21 AM
You sold out.  I knew it was you.  You got the pic from someone I sent it to and I can prove that.  There is a blog administrator who knows who fixed that picture to seeable long before you sold it.  That is the only picture I gave to anyone outside of a blog Admin., so I do not care what you all did with it, as it was a test and only a test and used to keep the spark going.  Funny, you have not produced any more, nor do you know how it is done.  Also it served the purpose I wanted it too.  As for the rest, you will never get your little paws on them until the evidence calls for it.  If they cannot put it together enough to need this, then I guess they will just stay where they are.   You have been goading me with the help of your alter ego here so you can cop some more and get a few bucks out of them.  No, girlie, you wont.  My time; my dime.    jackb
________________________
First of all Jack, I don't go to BFN Debbie would never share anything with me.
 She wouldn't defend my picture untill ART WOOD told her I was working with him and the family.
I found my own pictures from aruba bay video 24.
I was in a private site, many  posters here were with me when I did, what I did to see Natalee's face, and can back me up.

I didn't take your so called work if you had any.
 
I do have many more, all sent to the FBI with 2 return calls from them.
I got emails from other posters showing me how BFN posters were bashing me and I kept all of them.  So BITE ME

___________________________________________
Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 4:35 PM
Subject: Photo's in Enquirer


Debbie,

Please feel free to share this mail with anyone. I received an email from Blonde today with her concerns over the National Enquirer Article. She advised me that some of the members of your forum have been bashing her regarding the article and that the criticism is not justified. Please advise the members of your blog to target me with the criticism.

I received a telephone call from David Wright of the Enquirer. David who has been an ally and friend thru-out this entire ordeal involving Natalee said that a rival publication was about to break a story on the Chicago 24 Video and asked me if I knew anything about it. I told him that I do not have high speed Internet and was unable to view the entire video but that I had received photo's that were enhanced thru photo shop from Blonde. I advised David that I had arranged for professional examination of these pictures and the Video and that the early results of this examination were not promising. A Professor at the University of Florida who examined the data advised me that he believes the images which some people believe to be of Natalee are "Artifact" shadows of the plastic. I made it very to clear to everyone that Dave Holloway and I are very skeptical of the video and photo's because of the fact that Dave searched the area repeatedly during the first few days of June and also because of the fact that whoever posted the video has never come forward.

As you may or may not know this video was posted by the same person who posted the painting of the rocks video. This is important in that I felt that a news story regarding these photo's may well help us identify this individual. In other words someone might well come forward with information.

Not everyone is going to agree with my decision to allow David Wright to run with the story, but, I trust him and he has always written his Natalee Holloway stories with great truth and accuracy. I challenge anyone to find a lie on any of David Wright's stories regarding this case. Please remember that we need friends like David Wright to keep the pressure on in Aruba. And for all of your participant's information I want to make this very clear, NO One, and that includes me, has profited from these stories. Thanks, Art

_________________


Title: Re: Picture Dispute
Post by: Blonde on May 19, 2008, 02:14:33 PM
Also I posted some of my work here.
 Where is your work Jack OHHH I forgot you gave it to the blog administrator.

You got the pic from someone I sent it to and I can prove that
So now are you implying that Debbie gave it to me lol.
You crack me up
 

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=1066.msg156278#msg156278


Title: Re: Picture Dispute
Post by: finngirl on May 19, 2008, 04:42:12 PM

OK, jb: this thread is about picture dispute

I've allowed you some leeway
but all that has accomplished is more diversion from you

if you want threads about who is/is not american
or any other side issues to divert attention from your lies ...
ask the admin to set them up for you

since your mind is disorganized and mine is not ...
it appears that I must be the one to maintain focus here

why do you keep avoiding the central question?

IF YOU CAN'T/WON'T SHARE WHAT YOU CLAIM TO HAVE
WHY KEEP MENTIONING IT?

I was in constant/sometimes daily contact w/ blonde via PM/email/phone
when she was working her photo angle ...
it was a very lengthy process and you were not part of that

IF YOU CAN'T/WON'T BACK UP CLAIMS THAT OTHERS
ARE STEALING YOUR WORK WHY KEEP MENTIONING IT?

 :wink:



Title: Re: Picture Dispute
Post by: klaasend on May 19, 2008, 06:18:39 PM
>>>...:::yawn:::...<<<

this thread blows



I agree with Rob  ::MonkeyWink::

Also, my motto is put up or shut up.  I would like to point out too that you cannot determine a persons nationality based upon their forum nickname...just saying  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Picture Dispute
Post by: finngirl on May 19, 2008, 07:41:23 PM

a voice of reason! TY!  :cool:



Title: Re: Picture Dispute
Post by: Blonde on May 21, 2008, 06:11:06 PM
JACKB
Wrong picture.  For someone who thinks I am such a dunce, you seem to value my opinion.
Why?  I guess the first picture brought you in some bread???? Just to give you something to do, it is the picture that just shows an arm and part of a bathing suit top that is supposed to be NH.  There is is stupid face pastie "starting up at the bar" supposing to be interested in the "dancer."  The picture is a mockery.   jackb

 "I guess the first picture brought you in some bread" YOU ARE WRONG

I will skip by your posts from now on.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #756 6/5 -
Post by: carpe noctem on June 07, 2008, 02:43:43 PM
Jack B. = TOOL


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #756 6/5 -
Post by: Destiny on June 07, 2008, 02:57:56 PM
Thanks for the REALITY CHECK, Blonde. ;)

Carpe...please...REALITY CHECK ME.....I've been having puter problems the last 45 mins or so...haven't been able to access the NH site...Carpe...give the down and dirty...OK???

Destiny


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #756 6/5 -
Post by: jackb on June 07, 2008, 02:59:09 PM
Jack B. = TOOL

Maybe you better effing explain yourself.  I did as you asked and now you are saying this without explaining?   Jackb


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #756 6/5 -
Post by: SS on June 07, 2008, 03:01:14 PM
Thanks for the REALITY CHECK, Blonde. ;)

Carpe...please...REALITY CHECK ME.....I've been having puter problems the last 45 mins or so...haven't been able to access the NH site...Carpe...give the down and dirty...OK???

Destiny


Carpe, please chew it again because I don't understand what has just happened.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #756 6/5 -
Post by: carpe noctem on June 07, 2008, 03:04:17 PM
Hi Des,

This pic says it all, please inspect it carefully.

http://i83.photobucket.com/albums/j305/binwhack1/r5454eterer.png


I will just simply say, I'm not a jackb., anymore.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #756 6/5 -
Post by: carpe noctem on June 07, 2008, 03:04:59 PM
jack b. fan, rather.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #756 6/5 -
Post by: carpe noctem on June 07, 2008, 03:07:31 PM
Jack B.

 Photoshopped the Diario sneaker pic.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #756 6/5 -
Post by: jackb on June 07, 2008, 03:12:21 PM
Hi Des,

This pic says it all, please inspect it carefully.

http://i83.photobucket.com/albums/j305/binwhack1/r5454eterer.png


I will just simply say, I'm not a jackb., anymore.

If you want to say something, spit it out.  I never asked you to be a "Jackb."  Now if you are man enough to explain yourself, then do it, if not quit trying to implicate I have done something wrong.  Jackb


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #756 6/5 -
Post by: Blonde on June 07, 2008, 03:13:54 PM
Jack B.

 Photoshopped the Diario sneaker pic.

Do you mean he changed the color Balance


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #756 6/5 -
Post by: jackb on June 07, 2008, 03:17:08 PM
Jack B.

 Photoshopped the Diario sneaker pic.

You are a l***.  I have not "photoshopped" anything.  That is some of Blondie's ****.  She is behind you saying this.  The different areas are showing different lighting backgrounds in order to pick up the colors.  As far as me removing or placing anything I have not.  Anyone that says I would do this, I hope you rot in your tracks.
That is why I never posted anything because there is always someone on the net who does not understand my work and ignorantly tries to make me look like a freaking liar.   Jackb

ENOUGH!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #756 6/5 -
Post by: carpe noctem on June 07, 2008, 03:23:11 PM
Hi Des,

This pic says it all, please inspect it carefully.

http://i83.photobucket.com/albums/j305/binwhack1/r5454eterer.png


I will just simply say, I'm not a jackb., anymore.

If you want to say something, spit it out.  I never asked you to be a "Jackb."  Now if you are man enough to explain yourself, then do it, if not quit trying to implicate I have done something wrong.  Jackb


Hey Jack,


You let me do the worrying about where I do my spittin', buddy.

How about dem apples, okay?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #756 6/5 -
Post by: jackb on June 07, 2008, 03:24:38 PM
Jack B.

 Photoshopped the Diario sneaker pic.

Do you mean he changed the color Balance

Listen, you ignorant tool:  I never changed ANY colors.  I used different lighting techniques in different ares to bring out the scars, blood and colors depending on the lighting on the shoe. NO FREAKING colors have been applied.  The shoe is not finished.  All I did was bring out the colors and scars.  I thought someone on there would know why I was doing what.  I am not the least interested in the color of the shoe, just the sole of the shoe color.  I do not have that.  Now someday, you are going to freaking owe me an apology, but you know what??? You can kiss my azz.  I will not give you the time of day.  I do not need any ones approval or "love." or attention.  I do not need bragging on, because if I did the rest of what I have would have been presented almost 3 years ago.  Now when you want something else, you better know what you are talking about before you come at me with your ignorance.  Jackb


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #756 6/5 -
Post by: Observer on June 07, 2008, 03:28:55 PM
Ok thats Enough!!!!!!!! Take it to the Picture dispute thread and argue over there! Insults towards members will not be tolerated..

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2851.20


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #756 6/5 -
Post by: carpe noctem on June 07, 2008, 03:31:32 PM
Ok thats Enough!!!!!!!! Take it to the Picture dispute thread and argue over there! Insults towards members will not be tolerated..

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2851.20


Not even a problem, *******. I said my beliefs.

 I am done with it.

End of topic

from this end.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #756 6/5 -
Post by: jackb on June 07, 2008, 03:32:38 PM
I am saying he painted red spots where none exist

with the Diario front page picture

of the sneaker.



I am saying you are an ixxx  Place the spots side by sid and see if any of them are different except in size. xxx  No one could do that.  The light is bringing out the colors, but you not knowing (and xxx) what you are speaking of need to be hog-tied and horsewhipped for lying about that.  It would take forever to do that and keep it perfect.  You have not the slightes idea of what you are speaking. Blondie is wanting me to write a book so she can ge back in the Enquirer and sell some more of my work.  xxxxxx Jackb

Edited Personal attacks and insults against any members will not be tolerated! Knock it off!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #756 6/5 -
Post by: Rob on June 07, 2008, 03:39:05 PM
I use paint to crop and blow-up pictures. It's the only way to make sure that whatever you are doing is not inadvertently changed. Pixels are not filled in" in this application - they are instantly left out and the picture may be come blurry due to the missing pixels in an enlargement. Yes, there are millions of minor differences in a picture that the naked eye will not recognize... well, unless you're the next Picasso anyway.  ::MonkeyHaHa::

When you change the contrast, brightness, sharpness or tint - etc.. it will sometime even make a "ghost image".

I don't claim to have the best eyes on this board - those belong to my bro bro... - Carpe.

When any image is changed in a computer environment, you will always "find" things that are not there. Computers are a valuable tool for what we do, but in a computer program that is designed for entertainment - you will ask it to preform an application that is was never designed for. That's what the stuff the FBI uses is not available to us. Those programs are tested to make sure evidence is not created and someone goes to jail though innocent.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #756 6/5 -
Post by: Blonde on June 07, 2008, 03:39:07 PM
Jack B.

 Photoshopped the Diario sneaker pic.

You are a liar.  I have not "photoshopped" anything.  That is some of Blondie's lies.  She is behind you saying this.  The different areas are showing different lighting backgrounds in order to pick up the colors.  As far as me removing or placing anything I have not.  Anyone that says I would do this, I hope you rot in your tracks.
That is why I never posted anything because there is always someone on the net who does not understand my work and ignorantly tries to make me look like a freaking liar.   Jackb

 HOW DARE YOU SAY "That is some of Blondie's lies.  She is behind you saying this. " I DID NOT TELL CARPE TO SAY ANYTHING. HE HAS A MIND OF HIS OWN AND IS IN TITLED TO HIS OWN OPINION.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #756 6/5 -
Post by: jackb on June 07, 2008, 03:41:38 PM
Jack B.

 Photoshopped the Diario sneaker pic.

Do you mean he changed the color Balance
A computer will let you "change" colors or "enhance" colors -- it won't put something there that is not already visable. I'm with carpe.

Visable?  You and te computer disagree on what is visable.  You see limited colors, the computer does not.  The picture you see on the one I sent is what the computer sees.  If you knew what you were talking about that would make me mader, but since you do not, then I have to chalk it up to ignorance.  I don't need to cast my pearls to the swine among you for this is the reward I get for trying to share that is why I waited.  You tell this to the airport when they are looking at your underward and stuff in your pockets.  They are not using simply x-rays any longer.   Jackb


Title: Re: Picture Dispute
Post by: Blonde on June 07, 2008, 04:50:44 PM
Picture Dispute

(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/Evidence/23d77abf4856cb468e66a3ada3a2b54f.jpg)


(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/Evidence/2.png)


Title: Re: Picture Dispute
Post by: Blonde on June 07, 2008, 05:06:41 PM
Blondie is wanting me to write a book so she can ge back in the Enquirer and sell some more of my work.  xxxxxx Jackb

This is the first time I ever saw your work and believe me,I would never use your work.

I do all my work and also I give instructions on how you can do what I did yourself, you don't.
OK I'm done now  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Picture Dispute
Post by: MsVada on June 12, 2008, 09:31:30 PM
Don't know Jack B, but Finngirl has been here since DAY ONE, just like many of US. 

It is MY opinion, but the picture below the original has been altered with red. 

If I didn't know any better, Id swear susan was among us ::MonkeyEek::